Table of Contents                                Index to Financial Statements

 
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-K
þANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
 
For the Fiscal Year Ended December 31, 20172018
 
OR
¨TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
 For the Transition Period from              to             
Commission
File Number
 
Registrant, State of Incorporation,
Address and Telephone Number
 
I.R.S. Employer
Identification No.
1-3526 The Southern Company 58-0690070
  (A Delaware Corporation)  
  30 Ivan Allen Jr. Boulevard, N.W.  
  Atlanta, Georgia 30308  
  (404) 506-5000  
     
1-3164 Alabama Power Company 63-0004250
  (An Alabama Corporation)  
  600 North 18th Street  
  Birmingham, Alabama 35291  
  (205) 257-1000  
     
1-6468 Georgia Power Company 58-0257110
  (A Georgia Corporation)  
  241 Ralph McGill Boulevard, N.E.  
  Atlanta, Georgia 30308  
  (404) 506-6526
001-31737Gulf Power Company59-0276810
(A Florida Corporation)
One Energy Place
Pensacola, Florida 32520
(850) 444-6111  
     
001-11229 Mississippi Power Company 64-0205820
  (A Mississippi Corporation)  
  2992 West Beach Boulevard  
  Gulfport, Mississippi 39501  
  (228) 864-1211  
     
001-37803 Southern Power Company 58-2598670
  (A Delaware Corporation)  
  30 Ivan Allen Jr. Boulevard, N.W.  
  Atlanta, Georgia 30308  
  (404) 506-5000  
     
1-14174 Southern Company Gas 58-2210952
  (A Georgia Corporation)  
  Ten Peachtree Place, N.E.  
  Atlanta, Georgia 30309  
  (404) 584-4000  
     


    Table of Contents                                Index to Financial Statements

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:(1) 
Each of the following classes or series of securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act is listed on the New York Stock Exchange.
Title of each class   Registrant
Common Stock, $5 par value   The Southern Company
     
Junior Subordinated Notes, $25 denominations    
6.25% Series 2015A due 2075    
5.25% Series 2016A due 2076    
5.25% Series 2017B due 2077    
     
     
Class A preferred stock, cumulative, $25 stated capital   Alabama Power Company
5.00% Series    
     
     
Junior Subordinated Notes, $25 denominations   Georgia Power Company
5.00% Series 2017A due 2077    
     
     
Depositary preferred shares, each representing one-fourth of a share of preferred stock, cumulative, $100 par valueMississippi Power Company
5.25% Series
��
Senior Notes   Southern Power Company
1.000% Series 2016A due 2022    
1.850% Series 2016B due 2026
    
     
     
  
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act:(1)
  
     
Title of each class   Registrant
Preferred stock, cumulative, $100 par value   Alabama Power Company
4.20% Series                                      4.60% Series 4.72% Series          
4.52% Series                                      4.64% Series 4.92% Series          
     
Preferred stock, cumulative, $100 par valueMississippi Power Company
4.40% Series                                      4.60% Series
4.72% Series
(1)As ofAt December 31, 2017.2018.


    Table of Contents                                Index to Financial Statements

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act.

RegistrantYesNo
The Southern CompanyX 
Alabama Power CompanyX 
Georgia Power CompanyX 
Gulf Power CompanyX
Mississippi Power Company X
Southern Power CompanyX 
Southern Company GasX 
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act. Yes ¨ No x (Response applicable to all registrants.)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrants (1) have filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrants were required to file such reports), and (2) have been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes x No ¨
Indicate by check mark whether the registrants have submitted electronically and posted on their corporate web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrants were required to submit and post such files). Yes x No ¨
Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrants' knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K. ¨
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, a smaller reporting company, or an emerging growth company. See the definitions of "large accelerated filer," "accelerated filer," "smaller reporting company," and "emerging growth company" in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.
 
Registrant
Large
Accelerated
Filer
Accelerated
Filer
Non-accelerated
Filer
Smaller
Reporting
Company
Emerging Growth Company
The Southern CompanyX    
Alabama Power Company  X  
Georgia Power Company  X  
Gulf Power CompanyX
Mississippi Power Company  X  
Southern Power Company  X  
Southern Company Gas  X  
If an emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with any new or revised financial accounting standards provided pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act. ¨
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes ¨ No x (Response applicable to all registrants.)


    Table of Contents                                Index to Financial Statements

Aggregate market value of The Southern Company's common stock held by non-affiliates of The Southern Company at June 30, 2017: $47.929, 2018: $47.0 billion. All of the common stock of the other registrants is held by The Southern Company. A description of each registrant's common stock follows:

Registrant 
Description of
Common Stock
 Shares Outstanding at January 31, 20182019
The Southern Company Par Value $5 Per Share 1,008,159,4821,034,564,279
Alabama Power Company Par Value $40 Per Share 30,537,500
Georgia Power Company Without Par Value 9,261,500
Gulf Power CompanyWithout Par Value7,392,717
Mississippi Power Company Without Par Value 1,121,000
Southern Power Company Par Value $0.01 Per Share 1,000
Southern Company Gas Par Value $0.01 Per Share 100
Documents incorporated by reference: specified portions of The Southern Company's Definitive Proxy Statement on Schedule 14A relating to the 20182019 Annual Meeting of Stockholders are incorporated by reference into PART III. In addition, specified portions of the Definitive Information StatementsStatement on Schedule 14C of Alabama Power Company and Mississippi Power Company relating to each of their respective 2018its 2019 Annual MeetingsMeeting of Shareholders are incorporated by reference into PART III.
Each of Georgia Power Company, GulfMississippi Power Company, Southern Power Company, and Southern Company Gas meets the conditions set forth in General Instructions I(1)(a) and (b) of Form 10-K and is therefore filing this Form 10-K with the reduced disclosure format specified in General Instructions I(2)(b), (c), and (d) of Form 10-K.
This combined Form 10-K is separately filed by The Southern Company, Alabama Power Company, Georgia Power Company, Gulf Power Company, Mississippi Power Company, Southern Power Company, and Southern Company Gas. Information contained herein relating to any individual company is filed by such company on its own behalf. Each company makes no representation as to information relating to the other companies.


    Table of Contents                                Index to Financial Statements

Table of Contents

  Page
  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  
  
  

i

    Table of Contents                                Index to Financial Statements
DEFINITIONS

DEFINITIONS
When used in Items 1 through 5 and Items 9A through 15,this Form 10-K, the following terms will have the meanings indicated.
TermMeaning
2013 ARPAlternative Rate Plan approved by the Georgia PSC in 2013 for Georgia Power for the years 2014 through 2016 and subsequently extended through 2019
AFUDCAllowance for funds used during construction
Alabama PowerAlabama Power Company
AMEAAlabama Municipal Electric Authority
AOCIAccumulated other comprehensive income
AROAsset retirement obligation
ASCAccounting Standards Codification
ASUAccounting Standards Update
Atlanta Gas LightAtlanta Gas Light Company, a wholly-owned subsidiary of Southern Company Gas
Atlantic Coast PipelineAtlantic Coast Pipeline, LLC, a joint venture to construct and operate a natural gas pipeline in which Southern Company Gas has a 5% ownership interest
BcfBillion cubic feet
BechtelBechtel Power Corporation, the primary contractor for the remaining construction activities for Plant Vogtle Units 3 and 4
Bechtel AgreementThe October 23, 2017 construction completion agreement between the Vogtle Owners and Bechtel
CCRCoal combustion residuals
CCR RuleDisposal of Coal Combustion Residuals from Electric Utilities final rule published by the EPA in 2015
Chattanooga GasChattanooga Gas Company, a wholly-owned subsidiary of Southern Company Gas
Clean Air ActClean Air Act Amendments of 1990
CO2
Carbon dioxide
CODCommercial operation date
Contractor Settlement AgreementThe December 31, 2015 agreement between Westinghouse and the Vogtle Owners resolving disputes between the Vogtle Owners and the EPC Contractor under the Vogtle 3 and 4 Agreement
Cooperative EnergyElectric cooperative in Mississippi
CPCNCertificate of public convenience and necessity
Customer RefundsRefunds issued to Georgia Power customers in 2018 as ordered by the Georgia PSC related to the Guarantee Settlement Agreement
CWIPConstruction work in progress
DaltonCity of Dalton, Georgia, an incorporated municipality in the State of Georgia, acting by and through its Board of Water, Light, and Sinking Fund Commissioners
Dalton PipelineA pipeline facility in Georgia in which Southern Company Gas has a 50% undivided ownership interest
DOEU.S. Department of Energy
Duke Energy FloridaDuke Energy Florida, LLC
EBITEarnings before interest and taxes
ECMMississippi Power's energy cost management clause
ECO PlanMississippi Power's environmental compliance overview plan
Eligible Project CostsCertain costs of construction relating to Plant Vogtle Units 3 and 4 that are eligible for financing under the loan guarantee program established under Title XVII of the Energy Policy Act of 2005
EMCElectric membership corporation
EPAU.S. Environmental Protection Agency
EPC ContractorWestinghouse and its affiliate, WECTEC Global Project Services Inc.; the former engineering, procurement, and construction contractor for Plant Vogtle Units 3 and 4

ii

Table of ContentsIndex to Financial Statements
DEFINITIONS
(continued)


TermMeaning
FASBFinancial Accounting Standards Board
FERCFederal Energy Regulatory Commission
FFBFederal Financing Bank
FitchFitch Ratings, Inc.
FMPAFlorida Municipal Power Agency
GAAPU.S. generally accepted accounting principles
Georgia PowerGeorgia Power Company
Georgia Power 2019 Base Rate CaseGeorgia Power's base rate case scheduled to be filed by July 1, 2019
Georgia Power Tax Reform Settlement AgreementA settlement agreement between Georgia Power and the staff of the Georgia PSC regarding the retail rate impact of the Tax Reform Legislation, as approved by the Georgia PSC on April 3, 2018
GHGGreenhouse gas
Guarantee Settlement AgreementThe June 9, 2017 settlement agreement between the Vogtle Owners and Toshiba related to certain payment obligations of the EPC Contractor guaranteed by Toshiba
Gulf PowerGulf Power Company
Heating Degree DaysA measure of weather, calculated when the average daily temperatures are less than 65 degrees Fahrenheit
Heating SeasonThe period from November through March when Southern Company Gas' natural gas usage and operating revenues are generally higher
HLBVHypothetical liquidation at book value
Horizon PipelineHorizon Pipeline Company, LLC
IBEWInternational Brotherhood of Electrical Workers
IGCCIntegrated coal gasification combined cycle, the technology originally approved for Mississippi Power's Kemper County energy facility (Plant Ratcliffe)
IICIntercompany Interchange Contract
Illinois CommissionIllinois Commerce Commission
Interim Assessment AgreementAgreement entered into by the Vogtle Owners and the EPC Contractor to allow construction to continue after the EPC Contractor's bankruptcy filing
Internal Revenue CodeInternal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended
IPPIndependent Power Producer
IRPIntegrated Resource Plan
IRSInternal Revenue Service
ITAACInspections, Tests, Analyses, and Acceptance Criteria, standards established by the NRC
ITCInvestment tax credit
JEAJacksonville Electric Authority
KUAKissimmee Utility Authority
KWKilowatt
KWHKilowatt-hour
LIBORLondon Interbank Offered Rate
LIFOLast-in, first-out
LNGLiquefied natural gas
Loan Guarantee AgreementLoan guarantee agreement entered into by Georgia Power with the DOE in 2014, under which the proceeds of borrowings may be used to reimburse Georgia Power for Eligible Project Costs incurred in connection with its construction of Plant Vogtle Units 3 and 4
LOCOMLower of weighted average cost or current market price
LTSALong-term service agreement
MarketersMarketers selling retail natural gas in Georgia and certificated by the Georgia PSC

iii

Table of ContentsIndex to Financial Statements
DEFINITIONS
(continued)


TermMeaning
MEAG PowerMunicipal Electric Authority of Georgia
MergerThe merger, effective July 1, 2016, of a wholly-owned, direct subsidiary of Southern Company with and into Southern Company Gas, with Southern Company Gas continuing as the surviving corporation and a wholly-owned, direct subsidiary of Southern Company
MGPManufactured gas plant
Mississippi PowerMississippi Power Company
mmBtuMillion British thermal units
Moody'sMoody's Investors Service, Inc.
MPUSMississippi Public Utilities Staff
MRAMunicipal and Rural Associations
MWMegawatt
MWHMegawatt hour
natural gas distribution utilitiesSouthern Company Gas' seven natural gas distribution utilities (Nicor Gas, Atlanta Gas Light, Company, Virginia Natural Gas, Elizabethtown Gas, Florida City Gas, Chattanooga Gas, Company, and Elkton Gas)Gas as of June 30, 2018) (Nicor Gas, Atlanta Gas Light, Virginia Natural Gas, and Chattanooga Gas as of July 29, 2018)
NCCRGeorgia Power's Nuclear Construction Cost Recovery
NDRAlabama Power's Natural Disaster Reserve
NextEra EnergyNextEra Energy, Inc.
Nicor GasNorthern Illinois Gas Company, a wholly-owned subsidiary of Southern Company Gas
NOX
Nitrogen oxide
NRCU.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission
NYMEXNew York Mercantile Exchange, Inc.
NYSENew York Stock Exchange
OCIOther comprehensive income
OPCOglethorpe Power Corporation (an Electric Membership Corporation)
OTCOver-the-counter
OUCOrlando Utilities Commission


ii

Table of ContentsIndex to Financial Statements

DEFINITIONS
(continued)

TermMeaning
PATH ActProtecting Americans from Tax Hikes Act
Plant Vogtle Units 3PennEast PipelinePennEast Pipeline Company, LLC, a joint venture to construct and 4operate a natural gas pipeline in which Southern Company Gas has a 20% ownership interest
PEPTwo new nuclear generating units under construction at GeorgiaMississippi Power's Plant VogtlePerformance Evaluation Plan
PiedmontPiedmont Natural Gas Company, Inc.
Pivotal Home SolutionsNicor Energy Services Company, until June 4, 2018 a wholly-owned subsidiary of Southern Company Gas, doing business as Pivotal Home Solutions
Pivotal Utility HoldingsPivotal Utility Holdings, Inc., until July 29, 2018 a wholly-owned subsidiary of Southern Company Gas, doing business as Elizabethtown Gas (until July 1, 2018), Elkton Gas (until July 1, 2018), and Florida City Gas
power poolThe operating arrangement whereby the integrated generating resources of the traditional electric operating companies and Southern Power (excluding subsidiaries) are subject to joint commitment and dispatch in order to serve their combined load obligations
PowerSecurePowerSecure Inc.
PowerSouthPowerSouth Energy Cooperative
PPAPower purchase agreements, as well as, for Southern Power, contracts for differences that provide the owner of a renewable facility a certain fixed price for the electricity sold to the grid
PRPPipeline Replacement Program, Atlanta Gas Light's 15-year infrastructure replacement program, which ended in December 2013
PSCPublic Service Commission
PTCProduction tax credit

iv

Table of ContentsIndex to Financial Statements
DEFINITIONS
(continued)


TermMeaning
Rate CNPAlabama Power's Rate Certificated New Plant
Rate CNP ComplianceAlabama Power's Rate Certificated New Plant Compliance
Rate CNP PPAAlabama Power's Rate Certificated New Plant Power Purchase Agreement
Rate ECRAlabama Power's Rate Energy Cost Recovery
Rate NDRAlabama Power's Rate Natural Disaster Reserve
Rate RSEAlabama Power's Rate Stabilization and Equalization
registrantsSouthern Company, Alabama Power, Georgia Power, Gulf Power, Mississippi Power, Southern Power Company, and Southern Company Gas
revenue from contracts with customersRevenue from contracts accounted for under the guidance of ASC 606, Revenue from Contracts with Customers
ROEReturn on equity
RUSRural Utilities Service
S&PS&P Global Ratings, a division of S&P Global Inc.
SCSSouthern Company Services, Inc. (the Southern Company system service company)
SECU.S. Securities and Exchange Commission
SEGCOSouthern Electric Generating Company
SEPASoutheastern Power Administration
SequentSequent Energy Management, L.P.
SERCSoutheastern Electric Reliability Council
SNGSouthern Natural Gas Company, L.L.C.
SO2
Sulfur dioxide
Southern CompanyThe Southern Company
Southern Company GasSouthern Company Gas and its subsidiaries
Southern Company Gas CapitalSouthern Company Gas Capital Corporation, a 100%-owned subsidiary of Southern Company Gas
Southern Company Gas DispositionsSouthern Company Gas' disposition of Pivotal Home Solutions, Pivotal Utility Holdings' disposition of Elizabethtown Gas and Elkton Gas, and NUI Corporation's disposition of Pivotal Utility Holdings, which primarily consisted of Florida City Gas
Southern Company systemSouthern Company, the traditional electric operating companies, Southern Power, Southern Company Gas (as of July 1, 2016), SEGCO, Southern Nuclear, SCS, Southern Linc, PowerSecure (as of May 9, 2016), and other subsidiaries
Southern HoldingsSouthern Company Holdings, Inc.
Southern LincSouthern Communications Services, Inc.
Southern NuclearSouthern Nuclear Operating Company, Inc.
Southern PowerSouthern Power Company and its subsidiaries
SouthStarSouthStar Energy Services, LLC
SP SolarSP Solar Holdings I, LP
SP WindSP Wind Holdings II, LLC
SRRMississippi Power's System Restoration Rider, a tariff for retail property damage reserve
STRIDEAtlanta Gas Light's Strategic Infrastructure Development and Enhancement program
Subsidiary RegistrantsAlabama Power, Georgia Power, Mississippi Power, Southern Power, and Southern Company Gas
Tax Reform LegislationThe Tax Cuts and Jobs Act, which was signed into law on December 22, 2017 and became effective on January 1, 2018
ToshibaToshiba Corporation, parent company of Westinghouse
traditional electric operating companiesAlabama Power, Georgia Power, Gulf Power, and Mississippi Power through December 31, 2018; Alabama Power, Georgia Power, and Mississippi Power as of January 1, 2019
TritonTriton Container Investments, LLC

v

Table of ContentsIndex to Financial Statements
DEFINITIONS
(continued)


TermMeaning
VCMVogtle Construction Monitoring
VIEVariable interest entity
Virginia CommissionVirginia State Corporation Commission
Virginia Natural GasVirginia Natural Gas, Inc., a wholly-owned subsidiary of Southern Company Gas
Vogtle 3 and 4 AgreementAgreement entered into with the EPC Contractor in 2008 by Georgia Power, acting for itself and as agent for the Vogtle Owners, and rejected in bankruptcy in July 2017, pursuant to which the EPC Contractor agreed to design, engineer, procure, construct, and test Plant Vogtle Units 3 and 4
Vogtle OwnersGeorgia Power, OPC,Oglethorpe Power Corporation, MEAG, Power, and Dalton
Vogtle Services AgreementThe June 9, 2017 services agreement between the Vogtle Owners and the EPC Contractor, as amended and restated on July 20, 2017, for the EPC Contractor to transition construction management of Plant Vogtle Units 3 and 4 to Southern Nuclear and to provide ongoing design, engineering, and procurement services to Southern Nuclear
WACOGWeighted average cost of gas
WestinghouseWestinghouse Electric Company LLC

iiivi

    Table of Contents                                Index to Financial Statements

CAUTIONARY STATEMENT REGARDING
FORWARD-LOOKING INFORMATION
This Annual Report on Form 10-K contains forward-looking statements. Forward-looking statements include, among other things, statements concerning regulated rates, the strategic goals for the wholesale business, customer and sales growth, economic conditions, fuel and environmental cost recovery and other rate actions, projected equity ratios, current and proposed environmental regulations and related compliance plans and estimated expenditures, pending or potential litigation matters, access to sources of capital, projections for the qualified pension plans, postretirement benefit plans, and nuclear decommissioning trust fund contributions, financing activities, completion dates of construction projects, completion of announced acquisitions or dispositions, filings with state and federal regulatory authorities, impacts of the Tax Reform Legislation, federal and state income tax benefits, estimated sales and purchases under power sale and purchase agreements, and estimated construction and other plans and expenditures. In some cases, forward-looking statements can be identified by terminology such as "may," "will," "could," "would," "should," "expects," "plans," "anticipates," "believes," "estimates," "projects," "predicts," "potential," or "continue" or the negative of these terms or other similar terminology. There are various factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from those suggested by the forward-looking statements; accordingly, there can be no assurance that such indicated results will be realized. These factors include:

the impact of recent and future federal and state regulatory changes, including environmental laws and regulations, governing air, water, land, and protection of other natural resources, and also changes in tax (including the Tax Reform Legislation) and other laws and regulations to which Southern Company and its subsidiaries are subject, as well as changes in application of existing laws and regulations;
the uncertainty surrounding the recently enacted Tax Reform Legislation, including implementingextent and timing of costs and liabilities to comply with federal and state laws, regulations, and IRS interpretations, actions that may be taken in response by regulatory authorities,legal requirements related to CCR, including amounts for required closure of ash ponds and its impact, if any, on the credit ratings of Southern Company and its subsidiaries;ground water monitoring;
current and future litigation or regulatory investigations, proceedings, or inquiries;inquiries, including litigation and other disputes related to the Kemper County energy facility;
the effects, extent, and timing of the entry of additional competition in the markets in which Southern Company's subsidiaries operate;
variations in demand for electricity and natural gas, including those relating to weather, the general economy, population and business growth (and declines), the effects of energy conservation and efficiency measures,operate, including from the development and deployment of alternative energy sources such as self-generationsources;
variations in demand for electricity and distributed generation technologies, and any potential economic impacts resulting from federal fiscal decisions;natural gas;
available sources and costs of natural gas and other fuels;
the ability to complete necessary or desirable pipeline expansion or infrastructure projects, limits on pipeline capacity;capacity, and operational interruptions to natural gas distribution and transmission activities;
transmission constraints;
effects of inflation;
the ability to control costs and avoid cost and schedule overruns during the development, construction, and operation of facilities, including Plant Vogtle Units 3 and 4 which includeincludes components based on new technology that only recently began initial operation in the development and construction of generating facilities with designs that have not been previously constructed,global nuclear industry at this scale, including changes in labor costs, availability, and productivity,productivity; challenges with management of contractors, subcontractors, or vendors; adverse weather conditions,conditions; shortages, andincreased costs, or inconsistent quality of equipment, materials, and labor,labor; contractor or supplier delay,delay; non-performance under construction, operating, or other agreements,agreements; operational readiness, including specialized operator training and required site safety programs, unforeseenprograms; engineering or design problems,problems; design and other licensing-based compliance matters, including the timely resolution of ITAAC and the related approvals by the NRC; challenges with start-up activities, (includingincluding major equipment failure and system integration),integration; and/or operational performance;
the ability to construct facilities in accordance with the requirements of permits and licenses (including satisfaction of NRC requirements), to satisfy any environmental performance standards and the requirements of tax credits and other incentives, and to integrate facilities into the Southern Company system upon completion of construction;
investment performance of the Southern Company system's employee and retiree benefit plans and nuclear decommissioning trust funds;
advances in technology;
the ability to control operating and maintenance costs;
ongoing renewable energy partnerships and development agreements;
state and federal rate regulations and the impact of pending and future rate cases and negotiations, including rate actions relating to ROE, equity ratios, and fuel and other cost recovery mechanisms;

ivvii

    Table of Contents                                Index to Financial Statements

CAUTIONARY STATEMENT REGARDING FORWARD-LOOKING INFORMATION
(continued)
the ability to successfully operate the electric utilities' generating, transmission, and distribution facilities and Southern Company Gas' natural gas distribution and storage facilities and the successful performance of necessary corporate functions;
legal proceedings and regulatory approvals and actions related to Plant Vogtle Units 3 and 4, including Georgia PSC approvals and NRC actions;
litigation relatedunder certain specified circumstances, a decision by holders of more than 10% of the ownership interests of Plant Vogtle Units 3 and 4 not to proceed with construction and the ability of other Vogtle Owners to tender a portion of their ownership interests to Georgia Power following certain construction cost increases;
in the event Georgia Power becomes obligated to provide funding to MEAG with respect to the Kemper County energy facility;portion of MEAG's ownership interest in Plant Vogtle Units 3 and 4 involving JEA, any inability of Georgia Power to receive repayment of such funding;
the inherent risks involved in operating and constructing nuclear generating facilities, including environmental, health, regulatory, natural disaster, terrorism, and financial risks;facilities;
the inherent risks involved in transporting and storing natural gas;
the performance of projects undertaken by the non-utility businesses and the success of efforts to invest in and develop new opportunities;
internal restructuring or other restructuring options that may be pursued;
potential business strategies, including acquisitions or dispositions of assets or businesses, including the proposed disposition by a wholly-owned subsidiary of Southern Company Gas of Elizabethtown Gas and Elkton Gas and the potential sale of a 33% equity interest in substantially all of Southern Power's solar assets,Plant Mankato, which cannot be assured to be completed or beneficial to Southern Company or its subsidiaries;
the possibility that the anticipated benefits from the Merger cannot be fully realized or may take longer to realize than expected and the possibility that costs related to the integration of Southern Company and Southern Company Gas will be greater than expected;
the ability of counterparties of Southern Company and its subsidiaries to make payments as and when due and to perform as required;
the ability to obtain new short- and long-term contracts with wholesale customers;
the direct or indirect effect on the Southern Company system's business resulting from cyber intrusion or physical attack and the threat of physical attacks;
interest rate fluctuations and financial market conditions and the results of financing efforts;
access to capital markets and other financing sources;
changes in Southern Company's and any of its subsidiaries' credit ratings, including impacts on interest rates, access to capital markets, and collateral requirements;
the impacts of any sovereign financial issues, including impacts on interest rates, access to capital markets, impacts on foreign currency exchange rates, counterparty performance, and the economy in general, as well as potential impacts on the benefits of the DOE loan guarantees;ratings;
the ability of Southern Company's electric utilities to obtain additional generating capacity (or sell excess generating capacity) at competitive prices;
catastrophic events such as fires, earthquakes, explosions, floods, tornadoes, hurricanes and other storms, droughts, pandemic health events, such as influenzas, or other similar occurrences;
the direct or indirect effects on the Southern Company system's business resulting from incidents affecting the U.S. electric grid, natural gas pipeline infrastructure, or operation of generating or storage resources;
impairments of goodwill or long-lived assets;
the effect of accounting pronouncements issued periodically by standard-setting bodies; and
other factors discussed elsewhere herein and in other reports filed by the registrants from time to time with the SEC.
The registrants expressly disclaim any obligation to update any forward-looking statements.

vviii

    Table of Contents                                Index to Financial Statements

PART I
Item 1.BUSINESS
Southern Company was incorporated under the laws of Delaware on November 9, 1945. Southern Company owns all of the outstanding common stock of Alabama Power, Georgia Power, Gulf Power, and Mississippi Power, each of which is an operating public utility company. The traditional electric operating companies supply electric service in the states of Alabama, Georgia, Florida, and Mississippi. More particular information relating to each of the traditional electric operating companies is as follows:
Alabama Power is a corporation organized under the laws of the State of Alabama on November 10, 1927, by the consolidation of a predecessor Alabama Power Company, Gulf Electric Company, and Houston Power Company. The predecessor Alabama Power Company had been in continuous existence since its incorporation in 1906.
Georgia Power was incorporated under the laws of the State of Georgia on June 26, 1930.
Gulf Power is a Florida corporation that has had a continuous existence since it was originally organized under the laws of the State of Maine on November 2, 1925. Gulf Power became a Florida corporation after being domesticated under the laws of the State of Florida on November 2, 2005.
Mississippi Power was incorporated under the laws of the State of Mississippi on July 12, 1972 and effective December 21, 1972, by the merger into it of the predecessor Mississippi Power Company, succeeded to the business and properties of the latter company. The predecessor Mississippi Power Company was incorporated under the laws of the State of Maine on November 24, 1924.
On January 1, 2019, Southern Company completed its sale of Gulf Power to NextEra Energy for an aggregate cash purchase price of approximately $5.8 billion (less $1.3 billion of indebtedness assumed), subject to customary working capital adjustments. Gulf Power is an electric utility serving retail customers in the northwestern portion of Florida. See Note 15 to the financial statements under "Southern Company's Sale of Gulf Power" in Item 8 herein for additional information.
In addition, Southern Company owns all of the common stock of Southern Power Company, which is also an operating public utility company. The term "Southern Power" when used herein refers to Southern Power Company and its subsidiaries, while the term "Southern Power Company" when used herein refers only to the Southern Power parent company. Southern Power develops, constructs, acquires, owns, and manages power generation assets, including renewable energy projects, and sells electricity at market-based rates in the wholesale market. Southern Power Company is a corporation organized under the laws of Delaware on January 8, 2001. The term "Southern Power" when used herein refers toOn May 22, 2018, Southern Power sold a noncontrolling 33% equity interest in SP Solar, a limited partnership indirectly owning substantially all of Southern Power's solar facilities, for approximately $1.2 billion and, on December 11, 2018, Southern Power sold a noncontrolling tax equity interest in SP Wind, a holding company owning a portfolio of eight operating wind facilities, for approximately $1.2 billion. Southern Power also sold all of its equity interests in Plant Oleander and Plant Stanton Unit A (together, the Florida Plants) to NextEra Energy on December 4, 2018 for $203 million. On November 5, 2018, Southern Power entered into an agreement to sell all of its equity interests in Plant Mankato (including the 385-MW expansion currently under construction) for approximately $650 million. The transaction is subject to FERC and state commission approvals and is expected to close mid-2019. The ultimate outcome of this matter cannot be determined at this time. See "The Southern Company System – Southern Power" herein and its subsidiaries while the term "Southern Power Company" when used herein refers onlyNote 15 to the parent company.financial statements in Item 8 herein for additional information.
Southern Company Gas, which was acquired byall of the common stock of Southern Company Gas in July 2016,2016. Southern Company Gas is an energy services holding company whose primary business is the distribution of natural gas in sevenfour states - Illinois, Georgia, Virginia, New Jersey, Florida,and Tennessee and Maryland - through the natural gas distribution utilities. Southern Company Gas is also involved in several other businesses that are complementary to the distribution of natural gas. Southern Company Gas was incorporated under the laws of the State of Georgia on November 27, 1995 for the primary purpose of becoming the holding company for Atlanta Gas Light, Company, which was founded in 1856. In July 2018, Southern Company Gas completed sales of three of its natural gas distribution utilities (Elizabethtown Gas, Florida City Gas, and Elkton Gas). In June 2018, Southern Company Gas also completed the sale of Pivotal Home Solutions, which provided home equipment protection products and services. See "The Southern Company System – Southern Company Gas" herein and Note 15 to the financial statements in Item 8 herein for additional information regarding agreements entered into by a wholly-owned subsidiary of Southern Company Gas to sell two of its natural gas distribution utilities.information.
Southern Company also owns all of the outstanding common stock or membership interests of SCS, Southern Linc, Southern Holdings, Southern Nuclear, PowerSecure, and other direct and indirect subsidiaries. SCS, the system service company, has contracted with Southern Company, each traditional electric operating company, Southern Power, Southern Company Gas, Southern Nuclear, SEGCO, and other subsidiaries to furnish, at direct or allocated cost and upon request, the following services: general executive and advisory, general and design engineering, operations, purchasing, accounting, finance, and treasury, legal, tax, information technology, marketing, auditing, insurance and pension administration, human resources, systems and procedures, digital wireless communication,communications, cellular tower space, and other services with respect to business and operations, construction management, and power pool transactions. Southern Linc provides digital wireless communications for use by Southern Company and its subsidiary companies and also markets these services to the public and provides fiber optics services within the Southeast. Southern Holdings is an intermediate holding company subsidiary, primarily for Southern Company's investments in leveraged leases and energy-related funds and companies, and for other electric and natural gas products and

I-1

Table of ContentsIndex to Financial Statements

services. Southern Nuclear operates and provides services to the Southern Company system's nuclear power plants and is currently managing construction of and developing Plant Vogtle Units 3 and 4, which are co-owned by Georgia Power. PowerSecure is a provider of energy solutions, including distributed energy infrastructure, energy efficiency products and services, in the areas of distributed generation infrastructure, energy efficiency, and utility infrastructure.infrastructure services, to customers.
Alabama Power and Georgia Power each own 50% of the outstanding common stock of SEGCO. SEGCO is an operating public utility company that owns electric generating units with an aggregate capacity of 1,020 MWs at Plant Gaston on the Coosa River near Wilsonville, Alabama. Alabama Power and Georgia Power are each entitled to one-half of SEGCO's capacity and energy. Alabama Power acts as SEGCO's agent in the operation of SEGCO's units and furnishes fuel to SEGCO for its units.

I-1

Table of ContentsIndex See Note 7 to Financial Statements

the financial statements in Item 8 herein for additional information.
Segment information for Southern Company and Southern Company Gas is included in Note 1316 to the financial statements of Southern Company and Note 12 to the financial statements of Southern Company Gas in Item 8 herein.
The registrants' Annual Reports on Form 10-K, Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q, Current Reports on Form 8-K, and any amendments to those reports are made available on Southern Company's website, free of charge, as soon as reasonably practicable after such material is electronically filed with or furnished to the SEC. Southern Company's internet address is www.southerncompany.com.
The Southern Company System
Traditional Electric Operating Companies
The traditional electric operating companies are vertically integrated utilities that own generation, transmission, and distribution facilities. See PROPERTIES in Item 2 herein for additional information on the traditional electric operating companies' generating facilities. Each company's transmission facilities are connected to the respective company's own generating plants and other sources of power (including certain generating plants owned by Southern Power) and are interconnected with the transmission facilities of the other traditional electric operating companies and SEGCO. For information on the State of Georgia's integrated transmission system, see "Territory Served by the Southern Company System – Traditional Electric Operating Companies and Southern Power" herein.
Agreements in effect with principal neighboring utility systems provide for capacity and energy transactions that may be entered into from time to time for reasons related to reliability or economics. Additionally, the traditional electric operating companies have entered into voluntaryvarious reliability agreements with the subsidiaries of Entergy Corporation, Florida Electric Power Coordinating Group, and Tennessee Valley Authority and with Duke Energy Progress, LLC, Duke Energy Carolinas, LLC, South Carolina Electric & Gas Company, and Virginia Electric and Power Company,certain neighboring utilities, each of which provides for the establishment and periodic review of principles and procedures for planning and operation of generation and transmission facilities, maintenance schedules, load retention programs, emergency operations, and other matters affecting the reliability of bulk power supply. The traditional electric operating companies have joined with other utilities in the Southeast (including some of those referred to above) to form the SERC to augment further the reliability and adequacy of bulk power supply. Through the SERC, the traditional electric operating companies are represented on the NationalNorth American Electric Reliability Council.
The utility assets of the traditional electric operating companies and certain utility assets of Southern Power Company are operated as a single integrated electric system, or power pool, pursuant to the IIC. Activities under the IIC are administered by SCS, which acts as agent for the traditional electric operating companies and Southern Power Company. The fundamental purpose of the power pool is to provide for the coordinated operation of the electric facilities in an effort to achieve the maximum possible economies consistent with the highest practicable reliability of service. Subject to service requirements and other operating limitations, system resources are committed and controlled through the application of centralized economic dispatch. Under the IIC, each traditional electric operating company and Southern Power Company retains its lowest cost energy resources for the benefit of its own customers and delivers any excess energy to the power pool for use in serving customers of other traditional electric operating companies or Southern Power Company or for sale by the power pool to third parties. The IIC provides for the recovery of specified costs associated with the affiliated operations thereunder, as well as the proportionate sharing of costs and revenues resulting from power pool transactions with third parties. In connection with the sale of Gulf Power, an appendix was added to the IIC setting forth terms and conditions governing Gulf Power's continued participation in the IIC for a defined transition period that, subject to certain potential adjustments, is scheduled to end on January 1, 2024.
Southern Power and Southern Linc have secured from the traditional electric operating companies certain services which are furnished at cost in compliance with FERC regulations.
Alabama Power and Georgia Power each have agreements with Southern Nuclear to operate the Southern Company system's existing nuclear plants, Plants Farley, Hatch, and Vogtle. In addition, Georgia Power has an agreement with Southern Nuclear to develop, license, construct, and operate Plant Vogtle Units 3 and 4. See "Regulation – Nuclear Regulation" herein for additional information.

I-2

    Table of Contents                                Index to Financial Statements

Southern Power
Southern Power develops, constructs, acquires, owns, and manages power generation assets, including renewable energy facilities, and sells electricity at market-based rates (under authority from the FERC) in the wholesale market. Southern Power continually seeks opportunities to execute its strategy to create value through various transactions including acquisitions, dispositions, and sales of assets,partnership interests, development and construction of new generating facilities, and entry into PPAs primarily with investor-owned utilities, IPPs, municipalities, electric cooperatives, and other load-serving entities, as well as commercial and industrial customers. Southern Power's business activities are not subject to traditional state regulation like the traditional electric operating companies, but the majority of its business activities are subject to regulation by the FERC. Southern Power has attempted to insulate itself from significant fuel supply, fuel transportation, and electric transmission risks by generally making such risks the responsibility of the counterparties to its PPAs. However, Southern Power's future earnings will depend on the parameters of the wholesale market and the efficient operation of its wholesale generating assets, as well as Southern Power's ability to execute its growth strategy and to develop and construct generating facilities. For additional information on Southern Power's business activities, see MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS – OVERVIEW – "Business Activities" of Southern Power in Item 7 herein.
Southern Power Company directly owns and manages generation assets primarily in the Southeast, which are included in the power pool, and has various subsidiaries, which were created to own and operate natural gas and renewable generation facilities either wholly or in partnership with various third parties. As ofAt December 31, 2017,2018, Southern Power's generation fleet, which is owned in part with its various partners, totaled 12,94011,888 MWs of nameplate capacity in commercial operation (including 5,1524,508 MWs of nameplate capacity owned by its subsidiaries)subsidiaries and including Plant Mankato, which is classified as held for sale in the financial statements). In addition, Southern Power Company has other subsidiaries that are pursuing additional natural gas generation and other renewable generation development opportunities. The generation assets of Southern Power Company's subsidiaries are not included in the power pool.
SomeOn May 22, 2018, Southern Power sold a noncontrolling 33% equity interest in SP Solar, a limited partnership indirectly owning substantially all of Southern Power's solar facilities. On December 11, 2018, Southern Power sold a noncontrolling tax equity interest in SP Wind, a holding company which owns a portfolio of eight operating wind farms.
In addition, on December 4, 2018, Southern Power sold all of its equity interests in the Florida Plants and, in November 2018, entered into an agreement to sell Plant Mankato. The completion of the disposition of Plant Mankato is subject to the expansion unit reaching commercial operation as well as various other customary conditions to closing, including FERC and state commission approvals, and is expected to close mid-2019. The ultimate outcome of this matter cannot be determined at this time.
A majority of Southern Power's partnerships in renewable facilities allow for the sharing of cash distributions and tax benefits at differing percentages.percentages, with Southern Power isbeing the controlling member and thus consolidating the assets and operations of the partnerships. At December 31, 2018, Southern Power has three tax-equity partnership arrangements where the tax-equity investors receive substantially all of the tax benefits, including ITCs and PTCs. In addition, Southern Power holds controlling interests in eight partnerships in solar facilities through SP Solar. For seven of these solar partnerships, Southern Power and its new 33% partner, Global Atlantic, are entitled to 51% of all cash distributions from eight of the partnership entities and the respective partner whothat holds the classClass B membership interests is entitled to 49% of all cash distributions. For the Desert Stateline partnership, Southern Power isand Global Atlantic are entitled to 66% of all cash distributions and the classClass B member is entitled to 34% of all cash distributions. In addition, Southern Power isand Global Atlantic are entitled to substantially all of the federal tax benefits with respect to these nineeight partnership entities.
In September 2017, Finally, for the Roserock partnership, Southern Power began a legal entity reorganizationis entitled to 51% of various directall cash distributions and indirect subsidiaries that own and operate substantially all of the solar facilities, including certain subsidiaries owned in partnershipfederal tax benefits, with various third parties. The reorganization is expectedthe Class B member entitled to be substantially completed in the first quarter 2018. Southern Power is pursuing the sale49% of a 33% equity interest in the newly-formed holding company owning these solar assets, which, if successful, is expected to close in the middle of 2018. The ultimate outcome of this matter cannot be determined at this time.all cash distributions.
See PROPERTIES in Item 2 herein and Note 1115 to the financial statements of Southern Power in Item 8 herein, and Note 12 to the financial statements of Southern Company under "Southern Power" in Item 8 herein for additional information regarding Southern Power's acquisitions, dispositions, construction, and development projects.
Southern Power calculates an investment coverage ratio for its generating assets based on the ratio of investment under contract to total investment using the respective generation facilities' net book value (or expected in-service value for facilities under construction or being acquired) as the investment amount. With the inclusion of the PPAs and investments associated with the wind and natural-gas firednatural gas facilities currently under construction, and the Gaskell West 1 solar project, which was acquired subsequent to December 31, 2017, as well as other capacity and energy contracts, Southern Power has an average investment coverage ratio, at December 31, 2018, of 93% through 2023 and 91% through 2022 and 89% through 2027,2028, with an average remaining contract duration of approximately 15 years.14 years (including Plant Mankato, which is classified as held for sale in the financial statements).
Southern Power's natural gas and biomass sales are primarily through long-term PPAs that consist of two types of agreements. The first type, referred to as a unit or block sale, is a customer purchase from a dedicated plant unit where all or a portion of the generation from that unit is reserved for that customer. Southern Power typically has the ability to serve the unit or block sale customer from an alternate resource. The second type, referred to as requirements service, provides that Southern Power serves

I-3

Table of ContentsIndex to Financial Statements

the customer's capacity and energy requirements from a combination of the customer's own generating units and from Southern Power resources not dedicated to serve unit or block sales. Southern Power has rights to purchase power provided by the requirements customers' resources when economically viable. Capacity charges that form part of the PPA payments are designed to recover fixed and variable operations and maintenance costs based on dollars-per-kilowatt year and to provide a return on investment.
Southern Power's electricity sales from solar and wind generating facilities are predominantly through long-term PPAs; however, these solar and wind PPAs do not have a capacity charge and customers either purchase the energy output of a dedicated renewable facility through an energy charge or provide Southern Power a certain fixed price for the electricity sold

I-3

Table of ContentsIndex to Financial Statements

to the grid. As a result, Southern Power's ability to recover fixed and variable operations and maintenance expenses is dependent upon the level of energy generated from these facilities, which can be impacted by weather conditions, equipment performance, transmission constraints, and other factors.
The following tables set forth Southern Power's PPAs as of December 31, 2017:2018:
Block Sales PPAs
Facility/Source Counterparty 
MWs(1)

   Contract Term
Addison Units 1 and 3 Georgia Power 297
   through May 2030
Addison Unit 2 MEAG Power 149
   through April 2029
Addison Unit 4 Georgia Energy Cooperative 146
   through May 2030
Cleveland County Unit 1 North Carolina Electric Membership CorporationEMC (NCEMC) 45-18090-180
   through Dec. 2036
Cleveland County Unit 2 NCEMC 183
   through Dec. 2036
Cleveland County Unit 3 North Carolina Municipal Power Agency 1 183
   through Dec. 2031
Cleveland County Unit 4
PJM Interconnection LLC(2)
183
June 2020 – May 2021
Dahlberg Units 1, 3, and 5 Cobb EMC 224
   through Dec. 20262027
Dahlberg Units 2, 6, 8, and 10 Georgia Power 298
   through May 2025
Dahlberg Unit 4 Georgia Power 74
   through May 2030
Franklin Unit 1 Duke Energy Florida 434
   through May 2021
Franklin Unit 2 Morgan Stanley Capital Group 250
   through Dec. 2025
Franklin Unit 2 Jackson EMC 60-65
   through Dec. 2035
Franklin Unit 2 GreyStone Power Corporation 35-4035
   through Dec. 2035
Franklin Unit 2 Cobb EMC 100
   through Dec. 20262027
Franklin Unit 3 Morgan Stanley Capital Group 200200-300
through Dec. 2033
Franklin Unit 3Dalton70
   through Dec. 2027
Franklin Unit 3 City of Dalton Georgia 7016
   through Dec. 20272019
Harris Unit 1 Georgia Power 628640
   through May 2030
Harris Unit 2 Georgia Power 657
   through May 2019
Harris Unit 2 
Alabama Municipal Electric AuthorityAMEA(3)(2)
 25
   Jan. 2020 –through Dec. 2025
Mankato(3)
 Northern States Power Company 375
   through JuneJuly 2026
Mankato(3)
 Northern States Power Company 345
   
June 2019 – May 2039(4)
Nacogdoches City of Austin, Texas 100
   through May 2032
NCEMC PPA(5)
 EnergyUnited 100
   through Dec. 2021
Oleander Units 2, 3, and 4Seminole Electric Cooperative466
through Dec. 2021
Oleander Unit 5FMPA157
through Dec. 2027
Rowan CT Unit 1 North Carolina Municipal Power Agency 1 150
   through Dec. 2030
Rowan CT Unit 2
PJM Interconnection LLC(2)
154
June 2020 – May 2021
Rowan CT Units 2 and 3 EnergyUnited 100-175
   Jan. 2022 – Dec. 2025
Rowan CT Unit 3 EnergyUnited 113
   through Dec. 2023
Rowan CC Unit 4 EnergyUnited 23-328
   through Dec. 2025

I-4

    Table of Contents                                Index to Financial Statements

Block Sales PPAs (continued)
Facility/Source Counterparty 
MWs(1)

   Contract Term
Rowan CC Unit 4 Duke Energy Progress, LLC 150
   through Dec. 2019
Rowan CC Unit 4 
Macquarie
150-250
Jan. 2019 – Nov. 2020
Wansley Unit 6Century Aluminum(6) 158
   throughJan. 2019 – Dec. 2018
Stanton Unit AOUC342
through Sept. 2033
Stanton Unit AFMPA85
through Sept. 20332020
Wansley Unit 7 Jacksonville Electric Authority
JEA(6)
 200
   through Dec. 2019
(1)The MWs and related facility units may change due to unit rating changes or assignment of units to contracts.
(2)Amount sold into PJM capacity market.
(3)Alabama Municipal Electric AuthorityAMEA will also be served by Plant Franklin Unit 1 through December 2019.
(3)On November 5, 2018, Southern Power entered into an agreement with Northern States Power to sell all of its equity interests in Plant Mankato (including the 385-MW expansion currently under construction). The ultimate outcome of this matter cannot be determined at this time. See Note 15 to the financial statements under "Southern Power – Sales of Natural Gas Plants" in Item 8 herein for additional information.
(4)Subject to commercial operation of the 345-MW385-MW expansion project.
(5)Represents sale of power purchased from NCEMC under a PPA.
(6)Century Aluminum PPA is partiallyJEA will also be served by Plant FranklinWansley Unit 3.6 during 2019.
Requirements Services PPAs
Counterparty 
MWs(1)

 Contract Term
Nine Georgia EMCs 294-376
 through Dec. 2024
Sawnee EMC 267-639
 through Dec. 2027
Cobb EMC 0-170
0-145
 through Dec. 20262027
Flint EMC 136-360
135-194
 through Dec. 2024
City of Dalton Georgia 92
53-92
 through Dec. 2027
EnergyUnited 78-159
 through Dec. 2025
City of Blountstown, Florida 10
 through April 2022

(1)Represents forecasted incremental capacity needs over the contract term.
Solar/Wind PPAs
FacilityCounterparty
MWs(1)

Contract Term
Solar(2)
   
AdobeSouthern California Edison Company20
through June 2034
ApexNevada Power Company20
through Dec. 2037
Boulder 1(2)
Nevada Power Company100
through Dec. 2036
ButlerGeorgia Power100
through Dec. 2046
Butler Solar FarmGeorgia Power20
through Feb. 2036
CalipatriaSan Diego Gas & Electric Company20
through Feb. 2036
Campo VerdeSan Diego Gas & Electric Company139
through Oct. 2033
CimarronTri-State Generation and Transmission Association, Inc.30
through Dec. 2035
Decatur CountyGeorgia Power19
through Dec. 2035
Decatur ParkwayGeorgia Power80
through Dec. 2040
Desert Stateline(2)
Southern California Edison Company300
through Sept. 2036
East PecosAustin Energy119
through April 2032
Garland A(2)
Southern California Edison Company20
through Sept. 2036
Garland(2)
Southern California Edison Company180
through Oct. 2031
Gaskell West 1Southern California Edison Company20
through March 2038
GranvilleDuke Energy Progress, LLC23
through Oct. 2032
Henrietta
Henrietta(2)
Pacific Gas & Electric Company(3)100
through Sept. 2036
Imperial Valley(2)
San Diego Gas & Electric Company150
through Nov. 2039

I-5

    Table of Contents                                Index to Financial Statements


Solar/Wind PPAs (continued)
FacilityCounterparty
MWs(1)

Contract Term
LamesaCity of Garland, Texas102
through April 2032
Lost Hills Blackwell(2)
City of Roseville, California &
99% to Pacific Gas & Electric Company(3) and 1% to City of Roseville, California
32
through Dec. 2043
Macho SpringsEl Paso Electric Company50
through May 2034
Morelos
Pacific Gas & Electric Company(3)
15
through Feb. 2036
North Star(2)
Pacific Gas & Electric Company(3)
60
through June 2035
PawpawGeorgia Power30
through March 2046
Roserock(2)
Austin Energy157
through Nov. 2036
RutherfordDuke Energy Carolinas, LLC75
through Dec. 2031
SandhillsCobb EMC111
through Oct. 2041
SandhillsFlint EMC15
through Oct. 2041
SandhillsSawnee EMC15
through Oct. 2041
SandhillsMiddle Georgia and Irwin EMC2
through Oct. 2041
SpectrumNevada Power Company30
through Dec. 2038
Tranquillity(2)
Shell Energy North America (US), LP204
through Nov. 2019
Tranquillity(2)
Southern California Edison Company204
Dec. 2019 – Nov. 2034
Wind(4)
   
BethelGoogle Inc.225
through Jan. 2029
Cactus Flats(3)
General Mills, Inc.98
Aug. 2018 –through July 20342033
Cactus Flats(3)
General Motors Company50
Aug. 2018 –through July 20312030
Grant PlainsOklahoma Municipal Power Authority41
Jan. 2020 – Dec. 2039
Grant PlainsSteelcase Inc.25
through Dec. 2028
Grant PlainsAllianz Risk Transfer (Bermuda) Ltd.81-122
through March 2027
Grant WindEast Texas Electric Cooperative50
through MarchApril 2036
Grant WindNortheast Texas Electric Cooperative50
through MarchApril 2036
Grant WindWestern Farmers Electric Cooperative50
through MarchApril 2036
Kay WindWestar Energy Inc.200
through Dec. 2035
Kay WindGrand River Dam Authority99
through Dec. 2035
PassadumkeagWestern Massachusetts Electric Company40
through June 2031
Reading(5)
Royal Caribbean Cruises Ltd.200
April 2020 – March 2032
Salt Fork WindCity of Garland, Texas150
through Nov. 2030
Salt Fork WindSalesforce.com, Inc.24
through Nov. 2028
Tyler Bluff WindThe Proctor & Gamble Company96
through Dec. 2028
Wake Wind(2)
Equinix Enterprises, Inc.100
through Oct. 2028
Wake Wind(2)
Owens Corning125
through Oct. 2028
Wildhorse(5)
Arkansas Electric Cooperative Corporation100
Oct. 2019 – Sept. 2039
________________________
(1) MWs shown are for 100% of the PPA, which is based on demonstrated capacity of the facility.
(2) FacilityIn May 2018, Southern Power sold a noncontrolling 33% equity interest in SP Solar (a limited partnership indirectly owning all of Southern Power's solar facilities, except the Roserock and Gaskell West facilities). SP Solar is the subject51% majority owner of a partnership whereBoulder 1, Garland, Henrietta, Imperial Valley, Lost Hills Blackwell, North Star, and Tranquillity; the 66% majority owner of Desert Stateline; and the sole owner of the remaining SP Solar facilities. Southern Power is the 51% majority member.owner of Roserock and also the controlling partner in a tax equity partnership owning Gaskell West. All of these entities are consolidated subsidiaries of Southern Power.
(3) See PROPERTIESNote 1 to the financial statements under "RevenuesConcentration of Revenue" in Item 28 herein for additional information.information on Pacific Gas & Electric Company's bankruptcy filing.
(3)(4) In December 2018, Southern Power sold a noncontrolling tax equity interest in SP Wind (which owns all of Southern Power's wind facilities, except Cactus Flats and the two wind projects under construction, Reading and Wildhorse). SP Wind is the 90.1% majority owner of Wake Wind and owns 100% of the remaining SP Wind facilities. Southern Power owns 100% of Reading and Wildhorse and is the controlling partner in a tax equity partnership owning Cactus Flats. All of these entities are consolidated subsidiaries of Southern Power.
(5) Subject to commercial operation.
Purchased Power
Facility/SourceCounterpartyMWs
Contract Term
NCEMCNCEMC100
through Dec. 2021

I-6

    Table of Contents                                Index to Financial Statements

See MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS – FUTURE EARNINGS POTENTIAL – "Power Sales Agreements" and "Acquisitions" of Southern Power in Item 7 herein and Note 11 to the financial statements of Southern Power in Item 8 herein for additional information.
For the year ended December 31, 2017,2018, approximately 11.3%9.8% of Southern Power's revenues were derived from Georgia Power. Southern Power actively pursues replacement PPAs prior to the expiration of its current PPAs and anticipates that the revenues attributable to one customer may be replaced by revenues from a new customer; however, the expiration of any of Southern Power's current PPAs without the successful remarketing of a replacement PPA could have a material negative impact on Southern Power's earnings but is not expected to have a material impact on Southern Company's earnings.
Southern Company Gas
Southern Company Gas is an energy services holding company whose primary business is the distribution of natural gas through the natural gas distribution utilities. Southern Company Gas is also involved in several other businesses that are complementary to the distribution of natural gas, including gas marketing services,pipeline investments, wholesale gas services, and gas marketing services. During the fourth quarter 2018, Southern Company Gas changed its reportable segments to further align with the way its new Chief Operating Decision Maker reviews operating results and has reclassified prior years' data to conform to the new reportable segment presentation. This change resulted in a new reportable segment, gas pipeline investments, which was formerly included in gas midstream operations. Gas pipeline investments consists primarily of joint ventures in natural gas pipeline investments including a 50% interest in SNG, two significant pipeline construction projects, and a 50% joint ownership interest in the Dalton Pipeline. Gas distribution operations, wholesale gas services, and gas marketing services continue to remain as separate reportable segments and reflect the impact of the Southern Company Gas Dispositions. The all other non-reportable segment includes segments below the quantitative threshold for separate disclosure, including the storage and fuels operations that were formerly included in gas midstream operations, and other subsidiaries that fall below the quantitative threshold for separate disclosure.
Gas distribution operations, the largest segment of Southern Company Gas' business, operates, constructs, and maintains 82,000approximately 75,200 miles of natural gas pipelines and 14 storage facilities, with total capacity of 158 Bcf, to provide natural gas to residential, commercial, and industrial customers. Gas distribution operations serves approximately 4.64.2 million customers across seven states and has rates of return that are regulated by each individual state in return for exclusive franchises.four states.
On October 15, 2017,July 1, 2018, a Southern Company Gas subsidiary, Pivotal Utility Holdings, Inc., entered into agreements forcompleted the salesales of the assets of two of its natural gas distribution utilities, Elizabethtown Gas and Elkton Gas, to South Jersey Industries, Inc. for a total cash purchase price of $1.7 billion. As of December 31, 2017, the net book value of the assets to be disposed of in the sale was approximately $1.3 billion, which includes approximately $0.5 billion of goodwill. The goodwill is not deductible for tax purposes and, as a result, a deferred tax liability has not yet been provided. Through the completion of the asset sales, Southern Company Gas intends to invest less than $0.1 billion in capital additions required for ordinary business operations of these assets. The completion of each asset sale is subject to the satisfaction or waiver of certain conditions, including, among other customary closing conditions, the receipt of required regulatory approvals, including the FERC, the Federal Communications Commission, the New Jersey Board of Public Utilities, and, with respect to the sale of Elkton Gas, the Maryland PSC.On July 29, 2018, Southern Company Gas and South Jersey Industries, Inc. made joint filings on December 22, 2017 and January 16, 2018 withits wholly-owned direct subsidiary, NUI Corporation, completed the New Jersey Boardstock sale of Public Utilities andPivotal Utility Holdings, which then primarily consisted of Florida City Gas, to NextEra Energy. The transactions raised approximately $2.3 billion in proceeds. See Note 15 to the Maryland PSC, respectively, requesting regulatory approval. The asset sales are expected to be completed by the end of the third quarter 2018. The ultimate outcome of these matters cannot be determined at this time.financial statements under "Southern Company Gas" in Item 8 herein for additional information.
Gas marketing services is comprised of SouthStar Energy Services, LLC (SouthStar) and Nicor Energy Services Company (doing business as Pivotal Home Solutions) and providespipeline investments includes joint ventures in natural gas commodity and related services to customers in competitive markets or marketspipeline investments that provide for customer choice. SouthStar, serving approximately 774,000enable the provision of diverse sources of natural gas commoditysupplies to the customers markets gas to residential, commercial, and industrial customers and offers energy-related products that provideof Southern Company Gas. SNG, the largest natural gas price stabilitypipeline investment, is the owner of a 7,000-mile pipeline connecting natural gas supply basins in Texas, Louisiana, Mississippi, and utility bill management. Pivotal Home Solutions, serving approximately 1.2 million service contracts, provides a suite of home protection productsAlabama to markets in Louisiana, Mississippi, Alabama, Florida, Georgia, South Carolina, and services that offers homeowners predictability regarding their energy service delivery, systems, and appliances.Tennessee.
Wholesale gas services consists of Sequent Energy Management, L.P. and engages in natural gas storage and gas pipeline arbitrage and provides natural gas asset management and related logistical services to most of the natural gas distribution utilities as well as non-affiliate companies.
Gas midstream operations includes joint ventures in pipeline investments (including a 50% ownership interest in Southern Natural Gas Company, L.L.C.marketing services is comprised of SouthStar and two significant pipeline construction projects) as well as a 50% joint ownership in a significant pipeline project and wholly-ownedprovides natural gas storage facilitiescommodity and related services to customers in competitive markets or markets that enable the provision of diverse sources ofprovide for customer choice. SouthStar, serving approximately 697,000 natural gas suppliescommodity customers, markets gas to theresidential, commercial, and industrial customers of Southern Company Gas. Southern Natural Gas Company, L.L.C. is the owner of a 7,000-mile pipeline connectingand offers energy-related products that provide natural gas supply basins in Texas, Louisiana, Mississippi,price stability and Alabama to markets in Louisiana, Mississippi, Alabama, Florida, Georgia, South Carolina, and Tennessee.utility bill management.
For additional information on Southern Company Gas' business activities, see MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS – OVERVIEW – "Business Activities" and – FUTURE EARNINGS POTENTIAL ofOn June 4, 2018, Southern Company Gas completed the stock sale of Pivotal Home Solutions to American Water Enterprises LLC for $365 million. See Note 15 to the financial statements under "Southern Company Gas" in Item 7 herein.8 herein for additional information.
Other Businesses
PowerSecure, which was acquired by Southern Company in May 2016, provides products and services in the areas ofenergy solutions, including distributed energy infrastructure, energy efficiency products and services, and utility infrastructure.

I-7

Table of ContentsIndexinfrastructure services, to Financial Statements

customers.
Southern Holdings is an intermediate holding subsidiary, primarily for Southern Company's investments in leveraged leases and energy-related funds and companies, and also for other electric and natural gas products and services.
Southern Linc provides digital wireless communications for use by Southern Company and its subsidiary companies and also markets these services to the public. Southern Linc delivers multiple wireless communication options including push to talk, cellular service, text messaging, wireless internet access, and wireless data. Its system covers approximately 127,000 square

I-7

Table of ContentsIndex to Financial Statements

miles in the Southeast. Southern Linc also provides fiber optics services within the Southeast through its subsidiary, Southern Telecom, Inc.
These efforts to invest in and develop new business opportunities may offer potential returns exceeding those of rate-regulated operations. However, these activities often involve a higher degree of risk.
Construction Programs
The subsidiary companies of Southern Company are engaged in continuous construction programs to accommodate existing and estimated future loads on their respective systems. For estimated construction and environmental expenditures for the periods 20182019 through 2022,2023, see MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS – FINANCIAL CONDITION AND LIQUIDITY – "Capital Requirements and Contractual Obligations" of Southern Company, each traditional electric operating company, Southern Power, and Southern Company Gasregistrant in Item 7 herein. The Southern Company system's construction program consists of capital investment and capital expenditures to comply with environmental laws and regulations. The traditional electric operating companies also anticipate expenditures associated with ash pond closure and ground water monitoring under the Disposal of Coal Combustion Residuals from Electric Utilities rule (CCR Rule), which are reflected in the Southern Company system's asset retirement obligation liabilities. In 2018,2019, the construction program is expected to be apportioned approximately as follows:
Southern
Company
system(a)(b)
Alabama
Power
Georgia
Power(a)
Gulf
Power
Mississippi
Power
Southern
Company
    system(a)(b)
Alabama
Power(a)
Georgia
Power(a)
Mississippi
Power
(in billions)(in billions)
New generation$1.3
$
$1.3
$
$
$1.6
$
$1.6
$
Environmental compliance(c)
1.1
0.6
0.5
0.1

0.5
0.2
0.2

Generation maintenance0.9
0.5
0.2
0.1
0.1
0.9
0.4
0.4
0.1
Transmission0.9
0.3
0.5


1.0
0.3
0.6

Distribution1.2
0.5
0.5
0.1
0.1
1.1
0.5
0.5
0.1
Nuclear fuel0.3
0.1
0.2


0.2
0.1
0.1

General plant0.5
0.2
0.2


0.5
0.2
0.2

6.0
2.2
3.3
0.3
0.2
5.8
1.8
3.7
0.2
Southern Power(d)
1.3
 0.3
 
Southern Company Gas(e)
1.7
 1.6
 
Other subsidiaries0.4
 0.3
 
Total(a)
$9.4
$2.2
$3.3
$0.3
$0.2
$8.0
$1.8
$3.7
$0.2
(a)Totals may not add due to rounding.
(b)Includes the traditional electric operating companies, Southern Power, and Southern Company Gas,Subsidiary Registrants, as well as the other subsidiaries. See "Other Businesses" herein for additional information.
(c)
Reflects cost estimates for environmental regulations. These estimated expenditures do not include any potential compliance costs associated with thepending regulation of CO2 emissions from fossil-fuel-fired electric generating units or costs associated with ash pond closure and groundwater monitoring under the CCR Rule.Rule and the related state rules. See MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS – FUTURE EARNINGS POTENTIAL – "Environmental Matters – Environmental Laws and Regulations" and FINANCIAL CONDITION AND LIQUIDITY – "Capital Requirements and Contractual Obligations" of Southern Company and each traditional electric operating company in Item 7 herein for additional information.
(d)IncludesExcludes up to approximately $0.9$0.5 billion for planned expenditures for plant acquisitions and placeholder growth, which may vary materially due to market opportunities and Southern Power's ability to execute its growth strategy.
(e)
Includes costs for ongoing capital projects associated with infrastructure improvement programs for certain natural gas distribution utilities that have been previously approved by their applicable state regulatory agencies. See MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS – FUTURE EARNINGS POTENTIAL – "Infrastructure"Infrastructure Replacement Programs and Capital Projects"Projects" of Southern Company Gas in Item 7 herein for additional information. See

I-8

Table of ContentsIndex to Financial Statements

"The Southern Company System – Southern Company Gas" herein for additional information regarding agreements entered into by a wholly-owned subsidiary of Southern Company Gas to sell two of its natural gas distribution utilities. Projected capital expenditures of $0.1 billion related to these two natural gas distribution utilities are excluded from the amounts above.
The construction programs are subject to periodic review and revision, and actual construction costs may vary from these estimates because of numerous factors. These factors include: changes in business conditions; changes in load projections; changes in environmental laws and regulations; the outcome of any legal challenges to the environmental rules; changes in electric generating plants, including unit retirements and replacements and adding or changing fuel sources at existing electric generating units, to meet regulatory requirements; changes in FERC rules and regulations; state regulatory agency approvals; changes in the expected environmental compliance program; changes in legislation; the cost and efficiency of construction labor, equipment, and materials; project scope and design changes; storm impacts; and the cost of capital. In addition, there can

I-8

Table of ContentsIndex to Financial Statements

be no assurance that costs related to capital expenditures will be fully recovered. Additionally, planned expenditures for plant acquisitions may vary due to market opportunities and Southern Power's ability to execute its growth strategy.
In addition, theThe construction program also includes Plant Vogtle Units 3 and 4, which includes components based on new technology that only recently began initial operation in the developmentglobal nuclear industry at this scale and construction of new electric generating facilities with designs that have not been previously constructed, which may result inbe subject to additional revised cost estimates during construction. The ability to control costs and avoid cost and schedule overruns during the development, construction, and operation of new facilities is subject to a number of factors, including, but not limited to, changes in labor costs, availability, and productivity; challenges with management of contractors, subcontractors, or vendors; adverse weather conditions; shortages, increased costs, or inconsistent quality of equipment, materials, and labor; contractor or supplier delay; non-performance under construction, operating, or other agreements; operational readiness, including specialized operator training and required site safety programs; engineering or design problems; design and other licensing-based compliance matters, including the timely resolution of ITAAC and the related approvals by the NRC; challenges with start-up activities, including major equipment failure and system integration; and/or operational performance. See Note 32 to the financial statements of Southern Company and under "Georgia Power under "Nuclear Construction" and "Retail Regulatory MattersNuclear Construction" respectively, in Item 8 herein for additional information regarding Georgia Power's construction of Plant Vogtle Units 3 and 4.
Also see "Regulation – Environmental Laws and Regulations" herein for additional information with respect to certain existing and proposed environmental requirements and PROPERTIES – "Electric – Jointly-Owned Facilities" and – "Natural Gas – Jointly-Owned Facilities" in Item 2 herein and Note 5 to the financial statements under "Joint Ownership Agreements" in Item 8 herein for additional information concerning Alabama Power's, Georgia Power's, and Southern Power's joint ownership of certain generating units and related facilities with certain non-affiliated utilities and Southern Company Gas' joint ownership of a pipeline facility.
Financing Programs
See each of the registrant's MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS – FINANCIAL CONDITION AND LIQUIDITY in Item 7 herein and Note 68 to the financial statements of each registrant in Item 8 herein for information concerning financing programs.
Fuel Supply
Electric
The traditional electric operating companies' and SEGCO's supply of electricity is primarily fueled by natural gas and coal. Southern Power's supply of electricity is primarily fueled by natural gas. See MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS – RESULTS OF OPERATION – "Electricity Business – Fuel and Purchased Power Expenses" of Southern Company and MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS – RESULTS OF OPERATION – "Fuel and Purchased Power Expenses" of each traditional electric operating company in Item 7 herein for information regarding the electricity generated and the average cost of fuel in cents per net KWH generated for the years 20152016 through 2017.2018.
The traditional electric operating companies have agreements in place from which they expect to receive substantially all of their 20182019 coal burn requirements. These agreements have terms ranging between one and four years. In 2017,2018, the weighted average sulfur content of all coal burned by the traditional electric operating companies was 1.12%1.06%. This sulfur level, along with banked and purchased sulfur dioxideSO2 allowances, allowed the traditional electric operating companies to remain within limits set by Phase I of the Cross-State Air Pollution Rule (CSAPR) under the Clean Air Act. In 2017,2018, the Southern Company system did not purchase any sulfur dioxideSO2 allowances, annual nitrogen oxideNOx emission allowances, or seasonal nitrogen oxideNOx emission allowances from the market. As any additional environmental regulations are proposed that impact the utilization of coal, the traditional electric operating companies' fuel mix will be monitored to help ensure that the traditional electric operating companies remain in compliance with applicable laws and regulations. Additionally, Southern Company and the traditional electric operating companies will continue to evaluate the need to purchase additional emissions allowances, the timing of capital expenditures for emissions control equipment, and potential unit retirements and replacements. See MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS – FUTURE EARNINGS POTENTIAL – "Environmental Matters" of Southern Company, each traditional electric operating company, and Southern Power in Item 7 herein for additional information on environmental matters.
SCS, acting on behalf of the traditional electric operating companies and Southern Power Company, has agreements in place for the natural gas burn requirements of the Southern Company system. For 2018,2019, SCS has contracted for 510557 Bcf of natural gas supply under agreements with remaining terms up to 15 years. In addition to natural gas supply, SCS has contracts in place

I-9

Table of ContentsIndex to Financial Statements

for both firm natural gas transportation and storage. Management believes these contracts provide sufficient natural gas supplies, transportation, and storage to ensure normal operations of the Southern Company system's natural gas generating units.
Alabama Power and Georgia Power have multiple contracts covering their nuclear fuel needs for uranium, conversion services, enrichment services, and fuel fabrication. The uranium, conversion services, and fuel fabrication contracts are for have remaining

I-9

Table of ContentsIndex to Financial Statements

terms of less than 10 years with varying expiration dates.ranging from one to 17 years. The remaining term lengths for the enrichment services contracts are for less than 15 years with varying expiration dates.range from five to 10 years. Management believes suppliers have sufficient nuclear fuel production capability to permit the normal operation of the Southern Company system's nuclear generating units.
Changes in fuel prices to the traditional electric operating companies are generally reflected in fuel adjustment clauses contained in rate schedules. See "Rate Matters – Rate Structure and Cost Recovery Plans" herein for additional information. Southern Power's natural gas and biomass PPAs generally provide that the counterparty is responsible for substantially all of the cost of fuel.
Alabama Power and Georgia Power have contracts with the United States, acting through the DOE, that provide for the permanent disposal of spent nuclear fuel. The DOE failed to begin disposing of spent fuel in 1998, as required by the contracts, and Alabama Power and Georgia Power have pursued and are pursuing legal remedies against the government for breach of contract. See Note 3 to the financial statements of Southern Company, Alabama Power, and Georgia Power under "Nuclear"Nuclear Fuel Disposal Costs"Costs" in Item 8 herein for additional information.
Natural Gas
Recent advancesAdvances in natural gas drilling in shale producing regions of the United States have resulted in historically high supplies of natural gas and relatively low prices for natural gas. Procurement plans for natural gas supply and transportation to serve regulated utility customers are reviewed and approved by the state regulatory agencies in whichthe states where Southern Company Gas operates. Southern Company Gas purchases natural gas supplies in the open market by contracting with producers and marketers and, for the natural gas distribution utilities except Nicor Gas, from its wholly-owned subsidiary, Sequent, Energy Management, L.P., under asset management agreements in states where such agreements are approved by the applicable state regulatory agency. Southern Company Gas also contracts for transportation and storage services from interstate pipelines that are regulated by the FERC. When firm pipeline services are temporarily not needed, Southern Company Gas may release the services in the secondary market under FERC-approved capacity release provisions or utilize asset management arrangements, thereby reducing the net cost of natural gas charged to customers for most of the natural gas distribution utilities. Peak-use requirements are met through utilization of company-owned storage facilities, pipeline transportation capacity, purchased storage services, peaking facilities, and other supply sources, arranged by either transportation customers or Southern Company Gas.
Territory Served by the Southern Company System
Traditional Electric Operating Companies and Southern Power
TheAs of January 1, 2019, the territory in which the traditional electric operating companies provide retail electric service comprises most of the states of Alabama and Georgia, together with the northwestern portion of Florida and southeastern Mississippi. See Note 15 to the financial statements under "Southern Company's Sale of Gulf Power" in Item 8 herein for information on the sale of Gulf Power. In this territory there are non-affiliated electric distribution systems that obtain some or all of their power requirements either directly or indirectly from the traditional electric operating companies. As of December 31, 2017,January 1, 2019, the territory had an area of approximately 120,000114,000 square miles and an estimated population of approximately 1716 million. Southern Power sells electricity at market-based rates in the wholesale market, primarily to investor-owned utilities, IPPs, municipalities, and other load-serving entities, as well as commercial and industrial customers.
Alabama Power is engaged, within the State of Alabama, in the generation, transmission, distribution, and purchase of electricity and the sale of electric service, at retail in approximately 400 cities and towns (including Anniston, Birmingham, Gadsden, Mobile, Montgomery, and Tuscaloosa), as well as in rural areas, and at wholesale to 1411 municipally-owned electric distribution systems, 11all of which are served indirectly through sales to the Alabama Municipal Electric Authority,AMEA, and two rural distributing cooperative associations. The sales contract with AMEA is scheduled to expire on December 31, 2025. Alabama Power owns coal reserves near its Plant Gorgas and uses the output of coal from the reserves in its generating plants. Alabama Power also sells, and cooperates with dealers in promoting the sale of, electric appliances and products and markets and sells outdoor lighting services.
Georgia Power is engaged in the generation, transmission, distribution, and purchase of electricity and the sale of electric service within the State of Georgia, at retail in over 600 communities (including Athens, Atlanta, Augusta, Columbus, Macon, Rome, and Savannah), as well as in rural areas, and at wholesale to OPC, MEAG Power, Dalton, various EMCs, and non-affiliated utilities. Georgia Power also markets and sells outdoor lighting services.

I-10

Table of ContentsIndex to Financial Statements

Gulf Power is engaged, within the northwestern portion of Florida, in the generation, transmission, distribution, and purchase of electricity and the sale of electric service, at retail in 71 communities (including Pensacola, Panama City, and Fort Walton Beach), as well as in rural areas, and at wholesale to a non-affiliated utility.
Mississippi Power is engaged in the generation, transmission, distribution, and purchase of electricity and the sale of electric service within 23 counties in southeastern Mississippi, at retail in 123 communities (including Biloxi, Gulfport, Hattiesburg, Laurel, Meridian, and Pascagoula), as well as in rural areas, and at wholesale to one municipality, six rural electric distribution cooperative associations, and one generating and transmitting cooperative.

I-10

Table of ContentsIndex to Financial Statements

For information relating to KWH sales by customer classification for the traditional electric operating companies, see MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS – RESULTS OF OPERATIONS of Southern Company and each traditional electric operating company in Item 7 herein. For information relating to the number of retail customers served by customer classification for the traditional electric operating companies, see SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA of Southern Company and each traditional electric operating company in Item 6 herein. Also, for information relating to the sources of revenues for Southern Company, each traditional electric operating company, and Southern Power, reference is made to Item 7 herein.
The RUS has authority to make loans to cooperative associations or corporations to enable them to provide electric service to customers in rural sections of the country. As of December 31, 2017,January 1, 2019, there were approximately 6258 electric cooperative distribution systems operating in the territory in which the traditional electric operating companies provide electric service at retail or wholesale.
One of these organizations, PowerSouth, is a generating and transmitting cooperative selling power to several distributing cooperatives, municipal systems, and other customers in south Alabama and northwest Florida.Alabama. As of December 31, 2017,2018, PowerSouth owned generating units with approximately 2,100 MWs of nameplate capacity, including an undivided 8.16% ownership interest in Alabama Power's Plant Miller Units 1 and 2. PowerSouth's facilities were financed with RUS loans secured by long-term contracts requiring distributing cooperatives to take their requirements from PowerSouth to the extent such energy is available. See PROPERTIES – "Jointly-Owned Facilities" in Item 2 herein and Note 5 to the financial statements under "Joint Ownership Agreements" in Item 8 herein for details of Alabama Power's joint-ownership with PowerSouth of a portion of Plant Miller. Alabama Power has a system supply agreement with PowerSouth to provide 200 MWs of capacity service through December 31, 2030 with an option to extend and renegotiate in the event Alabama Power builds new generation or contracts for new capacity.
Alabama Power and Gulf Power havehas entered into a separate agreementsagreement with PowerSouth involving interconnection between their respective systems. The delivery of capacity and energy from PowerSouth to certain distributing cooperatives in the service territoriesterritory of Alabama Power and Gulf Power is governed by the Southern Company/PowerSouth Network Transmission Service Agreement. The rates for this service to PowerSouth are on file with the FERC.
OPC is an EMC owned by its 38 retail electric distribution cooperatives, which provide retail electric service to customers in Georgia. OPC provides wholesale electric power to its members through its generation assets, some of which are jointly owned with Georgia Power, and power purchased from other suppliers.
Four OPC and the 38 retail electric cooperative associations, financed bydistribution cooperatives are members of Georgia Transmission Corporation, an EMC (GTC), which provides transmission services to its members and third parties. See PROPERTIES – "Electric – Jointly-Owned Facilities" in Item 2 herein and Note 5 to the RUS, operate within Gulffinancial statements under "Joint Ownership Agreements" in Item 8 herein for additional information regarding Georgia Power's service territory. These cooperatives purchase their full requirements from PowerSouth and SEPA (a federal power marketing agency). A non-affiliated utility also operates within Gulf Power's service territory and purchases its full requirements from Gulf Power.jointly-owned facilities.
Mississippi Power has an interchange agreement with Cooperative Energy, a generating and transmitting cooperative, pursuant to which various services are provided.
As of December 31, 2017,January 1, 2019, there were approximately 7271 municipally-owned electric distribution systems operating in the territory in which the traditional electric operating companies provide electric service at retail or wholesale.
As of December 31, 2017,2018, 48 municipally-owned electric distribution systems and one county-owned system received their requirements through MEAG Power, which was established by a Georgia state statute in 1975. MEAG Power serves these requirements from self-owned generation facilities, some of which are jointly-owned with Georgia Power, and purchases from other resources. MEAG Power also has a pseudo scheduling and services agreement with Georgia Power. Dalton serves its requirements from self-owned generation facilities, some of which are jointly-owned with Georgia Power, and through purchases from Georgia Power and Southern Power through a service agreement. See PROPERTIES – "Jointly-Owned Facilities" in Item 2 herein and Note 5 to the financial statements under "Joint Ownership Agreements" in Item 8 herein for additional information.
Georgia Power has entered into substantially similar agreements with Georgia Transmission Corporation,GTC, MEAG Power, and Dalton providing for the establishment of an integrated transmission system to carry the power and energy of all parties. The agreements require an investment by each party in the integrated transmission system in proportion to its respective share of the aggregate system load. See PROPERTIES – "Jointly-Owned Facilities" in Item 2 herein for additional information.

I-11

Table of ContentsIndex to Financial Statements

Southern Power assumed or entered into PPAs with some of the traditional electric operating companies,Georgia Power, investor-owned utilities, IPPs, municipalities, electric cooperatives, and other load-serving entities, as well as commercial and industrial customers. See "The Southern Company System – Southern Power" above and MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS – FUTURE EARNINGS POTENTIAL – "Power Sales Agreements" of Southern Power in Item 7 herein for additional information concerning Southern Power's PPAs.
SCS, acting on behalf of the traditional electric operating companies, also has a contract with SEPA providing for the use of the traditional electric operating companies' facilities at government expense to deliver to certain cooperatives and municipalities,

I-11

Table of ContentsIndex to Financial Statements

entitled by federal statute to preference in the purchase of power from SEPA, quantities of power equivalent to the amounts of power allocated to them by SEPA from certain U.S. government hydroelectric projects.
Southern Company Gas
Southern Company Gas is engaged in the distribution of natural gas in sevenfour states through the natural gas distribution utilities. The natural gas distribution utilities construct, manage, and maintain intrastate natural gas pipelines and distribution facilities. Details of the natural gas distribution utilities at December 31, 20172018 are as follows:
UtilityStateNumber of customers
Approximate miles of pipe
  (in thousands) 
Nicor GasIllinois2,228
34,300
Atlanta Gas Light CompanyGeorgia1,622
33,500
Virginia Natural GasVirginia299
5,600
Elizabethtown Gas(*)
New Jersey292
3,200
Florida City GasFlorida109
3,700
Chattanooga Gas CompanyTennessee66
1,600
Elkton Gas(*)
Maryland7
100
Total 4,623
82,000
UtilityStateNumber of customers
Approximate miles of pipe
  (in thousands) 
Nicor GasIllinois2,237
34,285
Atlanta Gas LightGeorgia1,643
33,610
Virginia Natural GasVirginia301
5,650
Chattanooga GasTennessee67
1,655
Total 4,248
75,200
(*)For information relating to the pending asset sales of Elizabethtown Gas and Elkton Gas, see MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS – OVERVIEW – "Merger, Acquisition, and Disposition Activities" of Southern Company Gas in Item 7 herein and Note 11 to the financial statements of Southern Company Gas under "Proposed Sale of Elizabethtown Gas and Elkton Gas" in Item 8 herein.
For information relating to the sources of revenue for Southern Company Gas, see MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS – RESULTS OF OPERATIONS and – FUTURE EARNINGS POTENTIAL of Southern Company Gas in Item 7 herein.
Competition
Electric
The electric utility industry in the U.S. is continuing to evolve as a result of regulatory and competitive factors. Among the early primary agents of change was the Energy Policy Act of 1992, which allowed IPPs to access a utility's transmission network in order to sell electricity to other utilities.
The competition for retail energy sales among competing suppliers of energy is influenced by various factors, including price, availability, technological advancements, service, and reliability. These factors are, in turn, affected by, among other influences, regulatory, political, and environmental considerations, taxation, and supply.
The retail service rights of all electric suppliers in the State of Georgia are regulated by the Territorial Electric Service Act of 1973. Pursuant to the provisions of this Act, all areas within existing municipal limits were assigned to the primary electric supplier therein. Areas outside of such municipal limits were either to be assigned or to be declared open for customer choice of supplier by action of the Georgia PSC pursuant to standards set forth in this Act. Consistent with such standards, the Georgia PSC has assigned substantially all of the land area in the state to a supplier. Notwithstanding such assignments, this Act provides that any new customer locating outside of 1973 municipal limits and having a connected load of at least 900 KWs may exercise a one-time choice for the life of the premises to receive electric service from the supplier of its choice.
Pursuant to the 1956 Utility Act, the Mississippi PSC issued "Grandfather Certificates" of public convenience and necessity to Mississippi Power and to six distribution rural cooperatives operating in southeastern Mississippi, then served in whole or in part by Mississippi Power, authorizing them to distribute electricity in certain specified geographically described areas of the state. The six cooperatives serve approximately 325,000 retail customers in a certificated area of approximately 10,300 square miles. In areas included in a "Grandfather Certificate," the utility holding such certificate may extend or maintain its electric

I-12

Table of ContentsIndex to Financial Statements

system subject to certain regulatory approvals; extensions of facilities by such utility, or extensions of facilities into that area by other utilities, may not be made except upon a showing of, and a grant of a certificate of, public convenience and necessity. Areas included in such a certificateCPCN that are subsequently annexed to municipalities may continue to be served by the holder of the certificate,CPCN, irrespective of whether it has a franchise in the annexing municipality. On the other hand, the holder of the municipal franchise may not extend service into such newly annexed area without authorization by the Mississippi PSC.
Generally, the traditional electric operating companies have experienced, and expect to continue to experience, competition in their respective retail service territories in varying degrees from the development and deployment of alternative energy sources such as self-generation (as described below) and distributed generation technologies, as well as other factors.
Southern Power competes with investor-owned utilities, IPPs, and others for wholesale energy sales across various U.S. utility markets. The needs of these markets are driven by the demands of end users and the generation available. Southern Power's success in wholesale energy sales is influenced by various factors including reliability and availability of Southern Power's plants, availability of transmission to serve the demand, price, and Southern Power's ability to contain costs.

I-12

Table of ContentsIndex to Financial Statements

As of December 31, 2017,2018, Alabama Power had cogeneration contracts in effect with eightnine industrial customers. Under the terms of these contracts, Alabama Power purchases excess energy generated by such companies. During 2017,2018, Alabama Power purchased approximately 9899 million KWHs from such companies at a cost of $3 million.
As of December 31, 2017,2018, Georgia Power had contracts in effect with 2728 small power producers whereby Georgia Power purchases their excess generation. During 2017,2018, Georgia Power purchased 1.62.1 billion KWHs from such companies at a cost of $114$140 million. Georgia Power also has PPAs for electricity with four cogeneration facilities. Payments are subject to reductions for failure to meet minimum capacity output. During 2017,2018, Georgia Power purchased 26 million KWHs at a cost of $0.7$0.8 million from these facilities.
Also during 2017,2018, Georgia Power purchased energy from three customer-owned generating facilities. These customers provide only energy to Georgia Power, makewith no capacity commitment and are not dispatched by Georgia Power. During 2017,2018, Georgia Power purchased a total of 317341 million KWHs from the three customers at a cost of approximately $25$28 million.
As of December 31, 2017, Gulf Power had agreements in effect with various industrial, commercial, and qualifying facilities pursuant to which Gulf Power purchases "as available" energy from customer-owned generation. During 2017, Gulf Power purchased 277 million KWHs from such companies for approximately $7 million.
As of December 31, 2017,2018, Mississippi Power had a cogeneration agreement in effect with one of its industrial customers. Under the terms of this contract, Mississippi Power purchases any excess generation. During 2017,2018, Mississippi Power did not purchase any excess generation from this customer.
Natural Gas
Southern Company Gas' natural gas distribution utilities do not compete with other distributors of natural gas in their exclusive franchise territories but face competition from other energy products. Their principal competitors are electric utilities and fuel oil and propane providers serving the residential, commercial, and industrial markets in their service areas for customers who are considering switching to or from a natural gas appliance.
Competition for heating as well as general household and small commercial energy needs generally occurs at the initial installation phase when the customer or builder makes decisions as to which types of equipment to install. Customers generally use the chosen energy source for the life of the equipment.
Customer demand for natural gas could be affected by numerous factors, including:
changes in the availability or price of natural gas and other forms of energy;
general economic conditions;
energy conservation, including state-supported energy efficiency programs;
legislation and regulations;
the cost and capability to convert from natural gas to alternative energy products; and
technological changes resulting in displacement or replacement of natural gas appliances.
The natural gas-related programs generally emphasize natural gas as the fuel of choice for customers and seek to expand the use of natural gas through a variety of promotional activities. In addition, Southern Company Gas partners with third-party entities to market the benefits of natural gas appliances.
The availability and affordability of natural gas have provided cost advantages and further opportunity for growth of the businesses.

I-13

Table of ContentsIndex to Financial Statements

Seasonality
The demand for electric power and natural gas supply is affected by seasonal differences in the weather. In mostWhile the electric power sales of the areassome of the traditional electric operating companies serve,peak in the summer, others peak in the winter. In the aggregate, electric power sales peak during the summer with a smaller peak during the winter, while inwinter. In most of the areas Southern Company Gas serves, natural gas demand peaks during the winter. As a result, the overall operating results of Southern Company, the traditional electric operating companies, Southern Power, and Southern Company Gas in the future may fluctuate substantially on a seasonal basis. In addition, Southern Company, the traditional electric operating companies, Southern Power, and Southern Company Gas have historically sold less power and natural gas when weather conditions are milder.
Regulation
State CommissionsStates
The traditional electric operating companies and the natural gas distribution utilities are subject to the jurisdiction of their respective state PSCs or applicable state regulatory agencies. These regulatory bodies have broad powers of supervision and regulation over public utilities operating in the respective states, including their rates, service regulations, sales of securities (except for the Mississippi PSC), and, in the cases of the Georgia PSC and the Mississippi PSC, in part, retail service territories. See "Territory Served by the Southern Company System" and "Rate Matters" herein for additional information.

I-13

Table of ContentsIndex to Financial Statements

Federal Power Act
The traditional electric operating companies, Southern Power Company and certain of its generation subsidiaries, and SEGCO are all public utilities engaged in wholesale sales of energy in interstate commerce and, therefore, are subject to the rate, financial, and accounting jurisdiction of the FERC under the Federal Power Act. The FERC must approve certain financings and allows an "at cost standard" for services rendered by system service companies such as SCS and Southern Nuclear. The FERC is also authorized to establish regional reliability organizations which enforce reliability standards, address impediments to the construction of transmission, and prohibit manipulative energy trading practices.
Alabama Power and Georgia Power are also subject to the provisions of the Federal Power Act or the earlier Federal Water Power Act applicable to licensees with respect to their hydroelectric developments. As of December 31, 2017,2018, among the hydroelectric projects subject to licensing by the FERC are 14 existing Alabama Power generating stations having an aggregate installed capacity of 1,670,000 KWs and 17 existing Georgia Power generating stations and one generating station partially owned by Georgia Power, with a combined aggregate installed capacity of 1,087,2961,101,402 KWs.
In 2013, the FERC issued a new 30-year license to Alabama Power for Alabama Power's seven hydroelectric developments on the Coosa River (Weiss, Henry, Logan Martin, Lay, Mitchell, Jordan, and Bouldin). Alabama Power filed a petition requesting rehearing of the FERC order granting the relicense seeking revisions to several conditions of the license. Alabama Rivers Alliance, American Rivers, the Georgia Environmental Protection Division, and the Atlanta Regional Commission also filed petitions for rehearing of the FERC order. In April 2016, the FERC issued an order granting in part and denying in part Alabama Power's rehearing request. The order also denied all of the other rehearing requests. In MayAlso in 2016, Alabama Rivers Alliance and American Rivers filed a second rehearing request and in June 2016, also filed a petition with the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit for review of the license and the rehearing denial order. The FERC issued an order in September 2016 denying the second rehearing request, and American Rivers and Alabama Rivers Alliance subsequently filed an appeal of that order at the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit. The U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit consolidated the two appeals into one proceeding.proceeding and, on July 6, 2018, vacated the FERC's 2013 order for the new 30-year license and remanded the proceeding to the FERC. Alabama Power continues to operate the Coosa River developments under annual licenses issued by the FERC. The ultimate outcome of this matter cannot be determined at this time.
In 2017,2018, Alabama Power continued the process of developing an application to relicense the Harris Dam project on the Tallapoosa River, which is expected to be filed with the FERC by November 30, 2021. The current Harris Dam project license will expire on November 30, 2023.
In 2017,On May 31, 2018, Georgia Power continued the process of developingfiled an application to relicense the Wallace Dam project on the Oconee River. The current Wallace Dam project license will expire on June 1, 2020. On July 3, 2018, Georgia Power's hydro electric licenses expiring in 2023 includePower filed a Notice of Intent to relicense the Lloyd Shoals project on the RiverviewOcmulgee River. The application to relicense the Lloyd Shoals project andis expected to be filed with the FERC by December 31, 2021. The current Lloyd Shoals project license will expire on December 31, 2023. On December 18, 2018, Georgia Power filed applications to surrender the Langdale project. The FERC relicensing proceedings for these threeand Riverview hydroelectric projects are expected to begin in 2018.on the Chattahoochee River upon their license expirations on December 31, 2023. Both projects together represent 1,520 KWs of Georgia Power's hydro fleet capacity.
Georgia Power and OPC also have a license, expiring in 2027, for the Rocky Mountain Plant,project, a pure pumped storage facility of 847,800903,000 KW installed capacity. See PROPERTIES – "Jointly-Owned Facilities" in Item 2 herein for additional information.
Licenses for all projects, excluding those discussed above, expire in the years 2023-20662034-2066 in the case of Alabama Power's projects and in the years 2035-2044 in the case of Georgia Power's projects.
Upon or after the expiration of each license, the U.S. Government, by act of Congress, may take over the project or the FERC may relicense the project either to the original licensee or to a new licensee. In the event of takeover or relicensing to another,

I-14

Table of ContentsIndex to Financial Statements

the original licensee is to be compensated in accordance with the provisions of the Federal Power Act, such compensation to reflect the net investment of the licensee in the project, not in excess of the fair value of the property, plus reasonable damages to other property of the licensee resulting from the severance therefrom of the property. The FERC may grant relicenses subject to certain requirements that could result in additional costs.
The ultimate outcome of these matters cannot be determined at this time.
Nuclear Regulation
Alabama Power, Georgia Power, and Southern Nuclear are subject to regulation by the NRC. The NRC is responsible for licensing and regulating nuclear facilities and materials and for conducting research in support of the licensing and regulatory process, as mandated by the Atomic Energy Act of 1954, as amended; the Energy Reorganization Act of 1974, as amended; and the Nuclear Nonproliferation Act of 1978, as amended; and in accordance with the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969, as amended, and other applicable statutes. These responsibilities also include protecting public health and safety, protecting the

I-14

Table of ContentsIndex to Financial Statements

environment, protecting and safeguarding nuclear materials and nuclear power plants in the interest of national security, and assuring conformity with antitrust laws.
The NRC licenses for Georgia Power's Plant Hatch Units 1 and 2 expire in 2034 and 2038, respectively. The NRC licenses for Alabama Power's Plant Farley Units 1 and 2 expire in 2037 and 2041, respectively. The NRC licenses for Plant Vogtle Units 1 and 2 expire in 2047 and 2049, respectively.
In 2012, the NRC issued combined construction and operating licenses (COLs) for Plant Vogtle Units 3 and 4. Receipt of the COLs allowed full construction to begin. See MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS – FUTURE EARNINGS POTENTIAL – "Retail Regulatory Matters – Nuclear Construction" of Georgia Power in Item 7 herein and Note 32 to the financial statements of Southern Company under "Nuclear Construction" and "Georgia Power under "Retail Regulatory MattersNuclear Construction"Construction" in Item 8 herein for additional information.
See Notes 13 and 96 to the financial statements of Southern Company, Alabama Power,under "Nuclear Insurance" and Georgia Power"Nuclear Decommissioning," respectively, in Item 8 herein for information on nuclear decommissioning costsinsurance and nuclear insurance.decommissioning costs.
Environmental Laws and Regulations
The Southern Company system's operations are regulated by state and federal environmental agencies through a variety of laws and regulations governing air, water, land, and protection of other natural resources. Compliance with these existing environmental requirements involves significant capital and operating costs, a major portion of which is expected to be recovered through existing ratemaking provisions or through market-based contracts. There is no assurance, however, that all such costs will be recovered.
For Southern Company Gas, substantially all of these costs are related to former manufactured gas plantsMGP sites, which are primarilygenerally recovered through existing ratemaking provisions. See Note 3 to the financial statements of Southern Company Gas under "Environmental Matters" in Item 8 herein for additional information.
Compliance with federal environmental laws and resulting regulations, including, but not limited to, proposed and existing regulations related to air quality, water quality, CCR, and global climate issues, has been, and will continue to be, a significant focus for Southern Company, each traditional electric operating company, Southern Power, SEGCO,of the registrants and Southern Company Gas. NewSEGCO. Compliance with any new or revised environmental laws and regulations could affect many areas of the traditional electric operating companies', Southern Power's, SEGCO's, and the natural gas distribution utilities'Southern Company Gas' operations. See MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS – FUTURE EARNINGS POTENTIAL – "Environmental Matters" of Southern Company and each of the traditional electric operating companiesregistrants in Item 7 herein for additional information about environmental issues, including, but not limited to, proposed and final regulations related to air quality, water quality, CCRs, and global climate issues. See MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS – FUTURE EARNINGS POTENTIAL – "Environmental Matters" of Southern Power in Item 7 herein for additional information about environmental issues and global climate issues. See MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS – FUTURE EARNINGS POTENTIAL – "Environmental Matters" of Southern Company Gas in Item 7 herein for additional information about environmental remediation liabilities.
The Southern Company system's ultimate environmental compliance strategy including potential electric generating unit retirement and replacement decisions, and future environmental capital expenditures will depend on various factors, such as state-levelstate adoption and implementation of requirements, the availability and cost of any deployed control technology, fuel prices, and the outcome of pending and/or future legal challenges. Compliance costs may result from the installation of additional environmental controls, closure and monitoring of CCR facilities, unit retirements, and adding or changing fuel sources for certain existing units, as well as related upgrades to the transmission system.and distribution (electric and natural gas) systems. Environmental compliance spending over the next several years may differ materially from the amounts estimated. Such expenditures could affect results of operations, cash flows, andand/or financial condition if such costs are not recovered on a timely basis through regulated rates for the traditional electric operating companies and the natural gas distribution utilities or through long-term wholesale agreements for the traditional electric operating companies and Southern Power. Further, higher costs that are recovered through regulated rates

I-15

Table of ContentsIndex to Financial Statements

could contribute to reduced demand for energy, which could negatively affect results of operations, cash flows, and financial condition. Additionally, many commercial and industrial customers may also be affected by existing and future environmental requirements, which for some may have the potential to ultimately affect their demand for electricity and natural gas. See "Construction Program" herein and MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS – FUTURE EARNINGS POTENTIAL – "Environmental Matters" of Southern Company, each of the traditional electric operating companies, Southern Power, and Southern Company Gasregistrants in Item 7 herein for additional information. The ultimate outcome of these matters cannot be determined at this time.
Rate Matters
Rate Structure and Cost Recovery Plans
Electric
The rates and service regulations of the traditional electric operating companies are uniform for each class of service throughout their respective retail service territories. Rates for residential electric service are generally of the block type based upon KWHs used and include minimum charges. Residential and other rates contain separate customer charges. Rates for commercial service are presently of the block type and, for large customers, the billing demand is generally used to determine capacity and minimum bill charges. These large customers' rates are generally based upon usage by the customer and include rates with special features to encourage off-peak usage. Additionally, Alabama Power Gulf Power, and Mississippi Power are generally allowed by

I-15

Table of ContentsIndex to Financial Statements

their respective state PSCs to negotiate the terms and cost of service to large customers. Such terms and cost of service, however, are subject to final state PSC approval.
The traditional electric operating companies recover certain costs through a variety of forward-looking, cost-based rate mechanisms. Fuel and net purchased energy costs are recovered through specific fuel cost recovery provisions. These fuel cost recovery provisions are adjusted to reflect increases or decreases in such costs as needed or on schedules as required by the respective PSCs. Approved compliance, storm damage, and certain other costs are recovered at Alabama Power Gulf Power, and Mississippi Power through specific cost recovery mechanisms approved by their respective PSCs. Certain similar costs at Georgia Power are recovered through various base rate tariffs as approved by the Georgia PSC. Costs not recovered through specific cost recovery mechanisms are recovered at Alabama Power and Mississippi Power through annual, formulaic cost recovery proceedings and at Georgia Power and Gulf Power through periodic base rate proceedings.
See MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS – FUTURE EARNINGS POTENTIAL – "Regulatory Matters" of Southern Company and each of the traditional electric operating companies in Item 7 herein and Note 32 to the financial statements of Southern Company and each of the traditional electric operating companies under "Retail Regulatory Matters" in Item 8 herein for a discussion of rate matters and certain cost recovery mechanisms. Also, see Note 1 to the financial statements of Southern Company and each of the traditional electric operating companies in Item 8 herein for a discussion of recovery of fuel costs, storm damage costs, and compliance costs through rate mechanisms.
See "Integrated Resource Planning" herein and Note 2 to the financial statements under "Georgia PowerIntegrated Resource Plan" in Item 8 herein for a discussion of Georgia PSC certification of new demand-side or supply-side resources for Georgia Power. In addition, see MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS – FUTURE EARNINGS POTENTIAL – "Retail Regulatory Matters – Nuclear Construction" of Georgia Power in Item 7 herein and Note 32 to the financial statements of Southern Company under "Nuclear Construction" and "Georgia Power under "Retail Regulatory MattersNuclear Construction"Construction" in Item 8 herein for a discussion of the Georgia Nuclear Energy Financing Act and the Georgia PSC certification of Plant Vogtle Units 3 and 4, which have allowed Georgia Power to recover financing costs for construction of Plant Vogtle Units 3 and 4 during the construction period beginning insince 2011.
See Note 32 to the financial statements of Southern Company and Mississippi Power under "Kemper County Energy Facility" in Item 8 herein and MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS – FUTURE EARNINGS POTENTIAL – "Kemper County Energy Facility – Rate Recovery" of Mississippi Power in Item 7 herein for information on cost recovery plans with respect tofor the Kemper County energy facility.
The traditional electric operating companies and Southern Power Company and certain of its generation subsidiaries are authorized by the FERC to sell power to non-affiliates, including short-term opportunity sales, at market-based prices. Specific FERC approval must be obtained with respect to a market-based contract with an affiliate. See MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS – FUTURE EARNINGS POTENTIAL – "FERC Matters" of each of the registrants in Item 7 herein for information on the traditional electric operating companies' and Southern Power Company's market-based rate authority and pending FERC proceedings relating to this authority.
Mississippi Power serves long-term contracts with rural electric cooperative associations and a municipality located in southeastern Mississippi under cost-based electric tariffs which are subject to regulation by the FERC. The contracts with these wholesale customers represented 19.3%17.3% of Mississippi Power's total operating revenues in 20172018 and are largelygenerally subject to 10-year rolling 10-

I-16

Table of ContentsIndex to Financial Statements

year cancellation notices. Historically, these wholesale customers have acted as a group and any changes in contractual relationships for one customer are likely to be followed by the other wholesale customers.
Natural Gas
Southern Company Gas' seven natural gas distribution utilities are subject to regulation and oversight by their respective state regulatory agencies with respect to rates charged to their customers, maintenance of accounting records, and various service and safety matters.agencies. Rates charged to these customers vary according to customer class (residential, commercial, or industrial) and rate jurisdiction. These agencies approve rates designed to provide each natural gas distribution utility the opportunity to generate revenues to recover all prudently-incurred costs, including a return on rate base sufficient to pay interest on debt, and provide a reasonable return. Rate base generally consists of the original cost of the utility plant in service, working capital, and certain other assets, less accumulated depreciation on the utility plant in service and net deferred income tax liabilities, and may include certain other additions or deductions.
With the exception of Atlanta Gas Light, Company, which operates in a deregulated environment in which gas marketersMarketers rather than a traditional utility sell natural gas to end-use customers and earns revenue by charging rates to its customers based primarily on monthly fixed charges that are set by the Georgia PSC, the earnings of the natural gas distribution utilities can be affected by customer consumption patterns that are largely a function of weather conditions and price levels for natural gas.
The natural gas distribution utilities, excluding Atlanta Gas Light, Company, are authorized to use natural gas cost recovery mechanisms that allow them to adjust their rates to reflect changes in the wholesale cost of natural gas and to ensure they recoverrecovery of all of the costs prudently incurred in purchasing natural gas for their customers. In addition to natural gas cost recovery mechanisms, the natural gas distribution utilities have other cost recovery mechanisms, such as regulatory riders, which vary by utility but allow recovery of certain costs, such as those related to infrastructure replacement programs as well as environmental remediation and energy efficiency plans.
See MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS – FUTURE EARNINGS POTENTIAL – "Regulatory Matters – Utility Regulation and Rate Design" of Southern Company Gas in Item 7 herein and Note 32 to the financial statements of Southernunder "Southern Company Gas under "Regulatory Matters"Gas" in Item 8 herein for a discussion of rate matters and certain cost recovery mechanisms.

I-16

Table of ContentsIndex to Financial Statements

Integrated Resource Planning
Each of the traditional electric operating companies continually evaluates its electric generating resources in order to ensure that it maintains a cost-effective and reliable mix of resources to meet the existing and future demand requirements of its customers. See "Environmental Laws and Regulations" above for a discussion of existing and potential environmental regulations that may impact the future generating resource needs of the traditional electric operating companies.
CertainAlabama Power
Triennially, Alabama Power provides an IRP report to the Alabama PSC. This report overviews Alabama Power's resource planning process and contains information that serves as the foundation for certain decisions affecting Alabama Power's portfolio of supply-side and demand-side resources. The IRP report facilitates Alabama Power's ability to provide reliable and cost-effective electric service to customers, while accounting for the traditional electric operating companies are requiredrisks and uncertainties inherent in planning for resources sufficient to file IRPs with their respective statemeet expected customer demand. Under State of Alabama law, a CPCN must be obtained from the Alabama PSC as discussed below.before Alabama Power constructs any new generating facility, unless such construction is deemed an ordinary extension in the usual course of business.
Georgia Power
Triennially, Georgia Power must file an IRP with the Georgia PSC that specifies how it intends to meet the future electric service needs of its customers through a combination of demand-side and supply-side resources. The Georgia PSC, under state law, must certify any new demand-side or supply-side resources for Georgia Power to receive cost recovery. Once certified, the lesser of actual or certified construction costs and purchased power costs is recoverable through rates. Certified costs may be excluded from recovery only on the basis of fraud, concealment, failure to disclose a material fact, imprudence, or criminal misconduct.
See Note 32 to the financial statements of Southern Company under "Regulatory Matters – Georgia"Georgia Power – Rate Plans" andPlans," " – Integrated Resource Plan" and "Nuclear Construction" and Note 3 to the financial statements of Georgia Power under "Retail Regulatory Matters – Rate Plans," "– Integrated Resource Plan," and "– " – Nuclear Construction"Construction" in Item 8 herein for additional information.
Gulf Power
Annually by April 1, Gulf Power must file a 10-year site plan with the Florida PSC containing Gulf Power's estimate of its power-generating needs in the period and the general location of its proposed power plant sites. The 10-year site plans submitted by the state's electric utilities are reviewed by the Florida PSC and subsequently classified as either "suitable" or "unsuitable." The Florida PSC then reports its findings along with any suggested revisions to the Florida Department of Environmental Protection for its consideration at any subsequent electrical power plant site certification proceedings. Under

I-17

Table of ContentsIndex to Financial Statements

Florida law, any 10-year site plans submitted by an electric utility are considered tentative information for planning purposes only and may be amended at any time at the discretion of the utility with written notification to the Florida PSC.
Gulf Power's most recent 10-year site plan was classified by the Florida PSC as "suitable" in November 2017. The plan identifies environmental regulations and potential legislation or regulation that would impose mandatory restrictions on greenhouse gas emissions. See MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS – FUTURE EARNINGS POTENTIAL – "Environmental Matters – Environmental Laws and Regulations – Air Quality," "– Environmental Laws and Regulations – Coal Combustion Residuals," and "– Global Climate Issues" of Gulf Power in Item 7 herein.
As a result of the cost to comply with environmental regulations imposed by the EPA, Gulf Power retired its coal-fired generation at Plant Smith Units 1 and 2 (357 MWs) in March 2016. In August 2016, the Florida PSC approved Gulf Power's request to reclassify the remaining net book value of Plant Smith Units 1 and 2 and the remaining materials and supplies associated with these units as of the retirement date, totaling approximately $63 million, to a regulatory asset. Gulf Power began amortizing the investment balances over 15 years effective January 1, 2018 as determined in a rate case settlement agreement approved by the Florida PSC on April 4, 2017.
Mississippi Power
Mississippi Power's 2010 IRP indicated that, among other things, Mississippi Power planned to construct the Kemper County energy facility as an IGCC to meet its identified needs, to add environmental controls at Plant Daniel Units 1 and 2, to defer environmental controls at Plant Watson Units 4 and 5, and to continue operation of the combined cycle Plant Daniel Units 3 and 4. See MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS – FUTURE EARNINGS POTENTIAL – "Environmental Matters – Environmental Laws and Regulations – Air Quality" and "– Global Climate Issues" of Mississippi Power in Item 7 herein.
On February 6, 2018, the Mississippi PSC approved a settlement agreement related to cost recovery for the Kemper County energy facility, pursuant to which Mississippi Power agreed to filefiled a Reserve Margin Plan (RMP) byon August 6, 2018. The RMP will includeincludes many of the same aspects of a traditional IRP, but the RMP will also containcontains alternatives proposed by Mississippi Power to address its currentexisting reserve capacity, which is in excess ofgreater than the level required to meet Mississippi Power's long-term targeted reserve margin.projected summer peak demand. Mississippi Power developed the alternatives by evaluating the economics of each unit in Mississippi Power's fleet, the opportunities currently available in the wholesale market, and the operational constraints of the Southern Company system. The ultimate outcome of this matter cannot be determined at this time.
For additional information, regarding the Kemper County energy facility, see MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS – FUTURE EARNINGS POTENTIAL – "Kemper County Energy Facility" of Mississippi Power in Item 7 herein and Note 32 to the financial statements of Southern Company and Mississippi Power under "Kemper County Energy Facility" in Item 8 herein.
Employee Relations
The Southern Company system had a total of 31,34429,192 employees on its payroll at December 31, 2017.January 1, 2019.
 
Employees at December 31, 2017
January 1, 2019
Alabama Power6,6136,650
Georgia Power6,986
Gulf Power1,2886,967
Mississippi Power1,2421,053
PowerSecure1,4481,743
SCS3,7403,799
Southern Company Gas5,3184,389
Southern Nuclear3,9363,870
Southern Power541491
Other232230
Total31,34429,192
The traditional electric operating companies and the natural gas distribution utilities have separate agreements with local unions of the IBEW and the Utilities Workers Union of America generally covering wages, working conditions, and procedures for handling grievances and arbitration. These agreements apply with certain exceptions to operating, maintenance, and construction employees.

I-17

Table of ContentsIndex to Financial Statements

Alabama Power has agreements with the IBEW in effect through August 15, 2019. Upon notice given at least 60 days prior to that date, negotiations may be initiated with respect to agreement terms to be effective after such date.

I-18

Table of ContentsIndex to Financial Statements

Georgia Power has an agreement with the IBEW covering wages and working conditions, which is in effect through June 30, 2021.
Gulf Power has an agreement with the IBEW covering wages and working conditions, which is in effect through April 15, 2019. Upon notice given at least 60 days prior to that date, negotiations may be initiated with respect to agreement terms to be effective after such date.
Mississippi Power has an agreement with the IBEW covering wages and working conditions, which is in effect through May 1, 2019. In 2015, Mississippi Power signed a separate agreement with the IBEW related solely to the Kemper County energy facility; that current agreement is in effect through March 15, 2021. In August 2017, Mississippi Power signed an agreement with the IBEW that added several job classifications and provided guidelines related to the reorganization at the Kemper County energy facility.
Southern Nuclear has a five-year agreement with the IBEW covering certain employees at Plants Hatch and Plant Vogtle Units 1 and 2, which is in effect through June 30, 2021. A five-year agreement between Southern Nuclear and the IBEW representing certain employees at Plant Farley is in effect through August 15, 2019. Upon notice given at least 60 days prior to that date, negotiations may be initiated with respect to agreement terms to be effective after such date.
The agreements also make the terms of the pension plans for the companies discussed above subject to collective bargaining with the unions at either a five-year or a 10-year cycle, depending upon union and company actions.
The natural gas distribution utilities have separate agreements with local unions of the IBEW and Utilities Workers Union of America covering wages, working conditions, and procedures for handling grievances and arbitration. Nicor Gas' agreement with the IBEW is effective through February 29, 2020. Virginia Natural Gas' agreement with the IBEW is effective through May 16,15, 2020. Elizabethtown Gas' agreement with the Utility Workers Union of America is effective through November 21, 2019. The agreements also make the terms of the Southern Company Gas pension plan subject to collective bargaining with the unions when significant changes to the benefit accruals are considered by Southern Company Gas.
Effective in December 2017, 538 employees transferred from SCS to Southern Power. Southern Power became obligated for related employee costs including pension, other postretirement benefits, and stock-based compensation and has recognized the respective balance sheet assets and liabilities, including accumulated other comprehensive income impacts, in its balance sheet at December 31, 2017. Prior to the transfer of employees, Southern Power's agreements with SCS provided for employee services rendered at amounts in compliance with FERC regulations.


I-19I-18

    Table of Contents                                Index to Financial Statements

Item 1A. RISK FACTORS
In addition to the other information in this Form 10-K, including MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS – FUTURE EARNINGS POTENTIAL in Item 7 of each registrant, and other documents filed by Southern Company and/or its subsidiaries with the SEC from time to time, the following factors should be carefully considered in evaluating Southern Company and its subsidiaries. Such factors could affect actual results and cause results to differ materially from those expressed in any forward-looking statements made by, or on behalf of, Southern Company and/or its subsidiaries.
UTILITY REGULATORY, LEGISLATIVE, AND LITIGATION RISKS
Southern Company and its subsidiaries are subject to substantial state and federal governmental regulation. Compliance with current and future regulatory requirements and procurement of necessary approvals, permits, and certificates may result in substantial costs to Southern Company and its subsidiaries.
Southern Company and its subsidiaries including the traditional electric operating companies, Southern Power, and Southern Company Gas, are subject to substantial regulation from federal, state, and local regulatory agencies. Southern Companyagencies and its subsidiaries are required to comply with numerous laws and regulations and to obtain numerous permits, approvals, and certificates from the governmental agencies that regulate various aspects of their businesses. Jointly-owned facilities may be subject to regulation by governmental agencies of more than one state and those state's governmental agencies may have different policies with respect to such jointly-owned facilities.agencies. The traditional electric operating companies and the natural gas distribution utilities seek to recover their costs (including a reasonable return on invested capital) through their retail rates, which must be approved by the applicable state PSC or other applicable state regulatory agency. A state PSC or other applicable state regulatory agency, in a future rate proceeding, may alter the timing or amount of certain costs for which recovery is allowed or modify the current authorized rate of return. Rate refunds may also be required. Additionally, the rates charged to wholesale customers by the traditional electric operating companies and by Southern Power and the rates charged to natural gas transportation customers by Southern Company Gas' pipeline investments and for some of its storage assets must be approved by the FERC. These wholesale rates could be affected by changes to Southern Power's and the traditional electric operating companies' ability to conduct business pursuant to FERC market-based rate authority. TheRetaining this authority from the FERC rules relatedis important to retaining the authority to sell electricity at market-based rates in the wholesale markets are important for the traditional electric operating companiescompanies' and Southern Power if they arePower's ability to remain competitive in the wholesale markets in which they operate.electric markets.
The impact of any future revision or changes in interpretations of existing regulations or the adoption of new laws and regulations applicable to Southern Company or any of its subsidiaries is uncertain. Changes in regulation or the imposition of additional regulations could influence the operating environment of Southern Company and its subsidiaries and may result in substantial costs or otherwise negatively affect their results of operations.
The Southern Company system's costs of compliance with environmental laws and satisfying related AROs are significant. The costs of compliance with current and future environmental laws and related AROs and the incurrence of environmental liabilities could negatively impact the net income, cash flows, and financial condition of the registrants.
The Southern Company system's operations are subject to extensive regulation by state and federal environmental agencies through a variety of laws and regulations governing air, water, land, and the protection of other natural resources.regulations. Compliance with these existing environmental requirements involves significant capital and operating costs including the settlement of AROs, a major portion of which is expected to be recovered through existing ratemaking provisions or through market-based contracts. There is no assurance, however, that all such costs will be recovered. The registrants expect that thesefuture compliance expenditures will continue to be significant in the future.significant.
The EPA has adopted and is implementing regulations governing air and water quality including the emission of nitrogen oxide, sulfur dioxide, fine particulate matter, ozone, mercury, and other air pollutants under the Clean Air Act and regulations governing cooling water intake structures and effluent guidelines for steam electric generating plants under the Clean Water Act. The EPA has also is reconsideringadopted regulations governing the disposal of CCR, including coal ash and gypsum, in landfills and surface impoundments at active generating power generation plants. The cost estimates for AROs related to the disposal of CCR are based on information using various assumptions related to closure and post-closure costs, timing of future cash outlays, inflation and discount rates, and the potential methods for complying with the CCR Rule. The traditional electric operating companies will continue to periodically update their ARO cost estimates.
Additionally, environmental laws and regulations covering the handling and disposal of waste and release of hazardous substances could require the Southern Company system to incur substantial costs to clean up affected sites, including certain current and former operating sites, and locations affected by historical operations or subject to contractual obligations.
Existing environmental laws and regulations may be revised or new environmental laws and regulations related to air, water, land, and the protection of other natural resources may be adopted or become applicable to the traditional electric operating companies, Southern Power, and/or Southern Company Gas.

I-20

Table of ContentsIndex to Financial Statements

system. In addition, existing environmental laws and regulations may be impacted by related legal challenges.
Litigation over environmental issues and claims of various types, including property damage, personal injury, common law nuisance, and citizen enforcement of environmental requirements such as standards for air, water, land, and protection of other natural resources, has occurred throughout the U.S. This litigation has included claims for damages alleged to have been caused by CO2 and other emissions, CCR, releases of regulated substances, and alleged exposure to regulated substances, and/or requests for injunctive relief in connection with such matters.

I-19

Table of ContentsIndex to Financial Statements

Compliance with any new or revised environmental laws or regulations could affect many areas of the Southern Company system's operations. The Southern Company system's ultimate environmental compliance strategy including potential electric generating unit retirement and replacement decisions, and future environmental capital expenditures will depend on various factors, such as state adoption and implementation of requirements, the availability and cost of any deployed control technology, and the outcome of pending and/or future legal challenges. Compliance costs may result from the installation of additional environmental controls, closure and monitoring of CCR facilities, unit retirements, and adding or changing fuel sources for certain existing units, as well as related upgrades to the Southern Company system's transmission system.and distribution (electric and natural gas) systems. Environmental compliance spending over the next several years may differ materially from the amounts estimated. Such expenditures could affect results of operations, cash flows, andand/or financial condition if such costs are not recovered on a timely basis through regulated rates for the traditional electric operating companies and the natural gas distribution utilities or through long-term wholesale agreements for the traditional electric operating companies and Southern Power. Further, higher costs that are recovered through regulated rates could contribute to reduced demand for energy, which could negatively affect results of operations, cash flows, and financial condition. Additionally, many commercial and industrial customers may also be affected by existing and future environmental requirements, which for some may have the potential to ultimately affect their demand for electricity or natural gas.
Compliance with any new or revised environmental laws or regulations could affect many areas of the traditional electric operating companies', Southern Power's, and the natural gas distribution utilities' operations. The ultimate impact will depend on various factors, such as state adoption and implementation of requirements, the availability and cost of any deployed control technology, and the outcome of pending and/or future legal challenges. Additionally, many commercial and industrial customers may also be affected by existing and future environmental requirements, which may affect their demand for electricity and natural gas.
The Southern Company system may be exposed to regulatory and financial risks related to the impact of greenhouse gas (GHG)GHG legislation, regulation, and regulation.emission reduction goals.
In 2015, theThe EPA has published final rules limiting CO2 emissions from new, modified, and reconstructed fossil fuel-fired electric generating units and guidelines for states to develop plans to meet EPA-mandated CO2 emission performance standards for existing units (known as the Clean Power Plan or CPP). In February 2016, the U.S. Supreme Court granted a stay of the CPP, which will remain in effect through the resolution of the litigation in the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia challenging the legality of the CPP and any review by the U.S. Supreme Court. On March 28, 2017, the U.S. President signed an executive order directing agencies to review actions that potentially burden the development or use of domestically produced energy resources, including review of the CPP and other CO2 emissions rules. On October 10, 2017,August 31, 2018, the EPA published a proposed rule known as the Affordable Clean Energy (ACE) Rule, which is intended to repealreplace a regulation enacted in 2015 known as the Clean Power Plan (CPP), that would limit CO2 emissions from existing fossil fuel-fired electric generating units. The CPP and, on December 28, 2017, published an advanced notice of proposed rulemaking regarding a CPP replacement rule.
In 2015, partieshas been stayed by the U.S. Supreme Court since 2016. The ACE Rule would require states to the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change, including the United States, adopted the Paris Agreement, which established a non-binding universal framework for addressingdevelop GHG emissionsunit-specific emission rate standards based on nationally determined contributions. On Juneheat-rate efficiency improvements for existing fossil fuel-fired steam units. As proposed, combustion turbines, including natural gas combined cycles, are not affected sources. As of January 1, 2017,2019, the U.S. President announced thatSouthern Company system has ownership interests in 40 fossil fuel-fired steam units to which the United States would withdraw from the Paris Agreement and begin renegotiating its terms.proposed ACE Rule is applicable. The ultimate impact of this agreement orrule to the Southern Company system is currently unknown and will depend on changes between the proposal and the final rule, subsequent state plan developments and requirements, and any renegotiated agreement dependsassociated legal challenges.
The EPA also has proposed a review of final rules adopted in 2015 to establish performance standards for new, modified, and reconstructed electric utility generating units. The impact of any changes will depend on the content of any final rule adopted by the EPA and the outcome of any related legal challenges.
In April 2018, Southern Company established an intermediate goal of a 50% reduction in carbon emissions from 2007 levels by 2030 and a long-term goal of low- to no-carbon operations by 2050. To achieve these goals, the Southern Company system expects to continue growing its implementation by participating countries.renewable energy portfolio, optimize technology advancements to modernize its transmission and distribution systems, increase the use of natural gas for generation, complete ongoing construction projects, including Georgia Power's interest in Plant Vogtle Units 3 and 4, invest in energy efficiency, and continue research and development efforts focused on technologies to lower GHG emissions. The Southern Company system's ability to achieve these goals also will be dependent on many external factors, including supportive national energy policies, low natural gas prices, and the development, deployment, and advancement of relevant energy technologies.
Costs associated with these actionsGHG legislation, regulation, and emission reduction goals could be significant to the utility industry and the Southern Company system.significant. However, the ultimate impact of these environmental laws and regulations will depend on various factors, such as state adoption and implementation of requirements, low natural gas prices, the availabilitydevelopment, deployment, and costadvancement of any deployed control technology,relevant energy technologies, the ability to recover costs through existing ratemaking provisions, and the outcome of pending and/or future legal challenges.
Because natural gas is a fossil fuel with lower carbon content relative to other fossil fuels, future GHG constraints, including, but not limited to, the imposition of a carbon tax, may create additional demand for natural gas, both for production of electricity and direct use in homes and businesses. The impact is already being seen in the power production sector due to both environmental regulations and low natural gas costs. Future GHG constraints focused on minimizingdesigned to minimize emissions from natural gas albeit lower than other fossil fuels, could likewise result in increased costs to the Southern Company system and affect the demand for natural gas as well as the prices charged to customers and the competitive position of natural gas.

I-21I-20

    Table of Contents                                Index to Financial Statements

The net income of Southern Company, the traditional electric operating companies, and Southern Power could be negatively impacted by changes in regulations related to transmission planning processes and competition in the wholesale electric markets.
The traditional electric operating companies currently own and operate transmission facilities as part of a vertically integrated utility. A small percentage of transmission revenues are collected through the wholesale electric tariff but the majority of transmission revenues are collected through retail rates. FERC rules pertaining to regional transmission planning and cost allocation present challenges to transmission planning and the wholesale market structure in the Southeast.structure. The key impacts of these rules include:
possible disruption of the integrated resource planning processes within the states in the Southern Company system's service territory;
delays and additional processes for developing transmission plans; and
possible impacts on state jurisdiction of approving, certifying, and pricing new transmission facilities.
The FERC rules related to transmission are intended to spur the development of new transmission infrastructure to promote and encourage the integration of renewable sources of supply as well as facilitate competition in the wholesale market by providing more choices to wholesale power customers. Technology changes in the power and fuel industries continue to create significant impacts to wholesale transaction cost structures. The impact of these and other such developments and the effect of changes in levels of wholesale supply and demand are uncertain. The financial condition, net income, and cash flows of Southern Company, the traditional electric operating companies, and Southern Power could be adversely affected by these and other changes.
The traditional electric operating companies and Southern Power could be subject to higher costs as a result of implementing and maintaining compliance with the North American Electric Reliability Corporation mandatory reliability standards along with possible associated penalties for non-compliance.
Owners and operators of bulk power systems, including the traditional electric operating companies, are subject to mandatory reliability standards enacted by the North American Electric Reliability Corporation and enforced by the FERC. Compliance with or changes in the mandatory reliability standards may subject the traditional electric operating companies and Southern Power to higher operating costs and/or increased capital expenditures. If any traditional electric operating company or Southern Power is found to be in noncompliance with these standards, such traditional electric operating company or Southern Power could be subject to sanctions, including substantial monetary penalties.
Southern Company and its subsidiaries are continuing to review the Tax Reform Legislation, which has and could have a further material impact on the results of operations, financial condition, and cash flows of the registrants.
On December 22, 2017, the Tax Reform Legislation was signed into law and became effective on January 1, 2018. The Tax Reform Legislation significantly changes the U.S. Internal Revenue Code by, among other things, reducing the federal corporate income tax rate to 21% and repealing the corporate alternative minimum tax. As a result of the tax rate reduction, Southern Company recorded net, non-cash federal income tax benefits of $264 million in the fourth quarter 2017, comprised primarily of a $743 million tax benefit resulting from reductions in deferred tax liabilities at Southern Power, partially offset by tax expenses of $372 million and $93 million resulting from reductions in deferred tax assets at Mississippi Power and Southern Company Gas, respectively.
The tax rate reduction also resulted in a $6.9 billion increase in regulatory liabilities and a $0.4 billion decrease in regulatory assets across the traditional electric operating companies and the natural gas distribution utilities. The regulatory treatment of certain impacts of the Tax Reform Legislation is subject to the discretion of the FERC and the relevant state regulatory bodies.
For businesses other than regulated utility businesses, the Tax Reform Legislation allows 100% bonus depreciation of qualified property through 2022, which phases down through 2027, and limits interest expense deductions. Regulated utility businesses, including the majority of the operations of the traditional electric operating companies and the natural gas distribution companies, can continue deducting all business interest expense and are not eligible for bonus depreciation on capital assets acquired and placed in service after September 27, 2017. The Tax Reform Legislation retains normalization provisions for public utility property and existing renewable energy incentives. However, the tax rate reduction delays the utilization of renewable tax credit carryforwards as described in Note 5 to the financial statements of Southern Company, Alabama Power, Georgia Power, and Southern Power under "Federal Tax Reform Legislation" in Item 8 herein.
The Tax Reform Legislation also includes provisions that limit the utilization of future net operating losses and limit the deductibility of certain executive compensation and other expenses. Further, while it is unclear how the credit rating agencies, the FERC, and relevant state regulatory bodies may respond to the Tax Reform Legislation, certain financial metrics, such as funds from operations to debt percentage, used by the credit rating agencies to assess the registrants, Southern Company Gas Capital, and Nicor Gas may be negatively impacted.

I-22

Table of ContentsIndex to Financial Statements

The Tax Reform Legislation is unclear in certain respects and will require interpretations, guidance, and implementing regulations by the IRS, as well as each respective state's adoption. In addition, the regulatory treatment of certain impacts of the Tax Reform Legislation is subject to the discretion of the FERC and relevant state regulatory bodies. Southern Company and its subsidiaries are continuing to review the Tax Reform Legislation and are assessing whether any potential actions are available to mitigate adverse impacts of the legislation. Southern Company and its subsidiaries may identify additional impacts as they further assess the Tax Reform Legislation and as the IRS issues interpretations and implements regulations. Southern Company will continue to monitor the actions of state legislatures and state taxing authorities to see how the states may adopt and implement the Tax Reform Legislation. While the ultimate impact of the Tax Reform Legislation, future interpretations and implementation of regulations by the IRS and state tax authorities, and any mitigating actions Southern Company and its subsidiaries may take cannot be determined at this time, the Tax Reform Legislation had and could have a further material impact on the results of operations, financial condition and cash flows of the registrants.
OPERATIONAL RISKS
The financial performance of Southern Company and its subsidiaries may be adversely affected if the subsidiaries are unable to successfully operate their facilities or perform certain corporate functions.
The financial performance of Southern Company and its subsidiaries depends on the successful operation of the electric utilities' generating,generation, transmission, and distribution facilities and Southern Company Gas' natural gas distribution and storage facilities and the successful performance of necessary corporate functions. There are many risks that could affect these operations and performance of corporate functions, including:
operator error or failure of equipment or processes;
accidents or explosions;accidents;
operating limitations that may be imposed by environmental or other regulatory requirements;requirements or in connection with joint owner arrangements;
labor disputes;
terrorist attacks (physical and/or cyber);physical attacks;
fuel or material supply interruptions;interruptions and/or shortages;
transmission disruption or capacity constraints, including with respect to the Southern Company system's and third parties' transmission, storage, and transportation facilities;
compliance with mandatory reliability standards, including mandatory cyber security standards;
implementation of new technologies;
information technology system failure;failures;
cyber intrusion;intrusions;
an environmental event,events, such as a spillspills or release;releases; and
catastrophic events such as fires, earthquakes, explosions, floods, droughts,tornadoes, hurricanes tornadoes, and other storms, droughts, pandemic health events, such as influenzas, or other similar occurrences.
A decrease or elimination of revenues from the electric generation, transmission, or distribution facilities or natural gas distribution or storage facilities or an increase in the cost of operating the facilities would reduce the net income and cash flows and could adversely impact the financial condition of the affected traditional electric operating company, Southern Power, or Southern Company Gas andregistrant.

I-21

Table of Southern Company.ContentsIndex to Financial Statements

Operation of nuclear facilities involves inherent risks, including environmental, safety, health, regulatory, natural disasters, terrorism,cyber intrusions or physical attacks, and financial risks, that could result in fines or the closure of the nuclear units owned by Alabama Power or Georgia Power and which may present potential exposures in excess of insurance coverage.
Alabama Power owns, and contracts for the operation of, two nuclear units and Georgia Power holds undivided interests in, and contracts for the operation of, four existing nuclear units. The six existing units are operated by Southern Nuclear and represent approximately 3,680 MWs, or 8% of the Southern Company system's electric generation capacity as of December 31, 2017.at January 1, 2019. In addition, these units generated approximately 25% of the total KWHs generated by each of Alabama Power and Georgia Power in the year ended December 31, 2017.2018. In addition, Southern Nuclear, on behalf of Georgia Power and the other Vogtle Owners, is managing the construction of Plant Vogtle Units 3 and 4. Due solely to the increase in nuclear generating capacity, the below risks are expected to increase incrementally once Plant Vogtle Units 3 and 4 are operational. Nuclear facilities are subject to environmental, safety, health, operational, and financial risks such as:
the potential harmful effects on the environment and human health and safety resulting from a release of radioactive materials in connection with the operation of nuclear facilities and the storage, handling, and disposal of radioactive material, including spent nuclear fuel;
uncertainties with respect to the ability to dispose of spent nuclear fuel and the need for longer term on-site storage;
uncertainties with respect to the technological and financial aspects of decommissioning nuclear plants at the end of licensed lives and the ability to maintain and anticipate adequate capital reserves for decommissioning;

I-23

Table of ContentsIndex to Financial Statements

limitations on the amounts and types of insurance commercially available to cover losses that might arise in connection with the nuclear operations of Alabama Power and Georgia Power or those of other commercial nuclear facility owners in the U.S.;
potential liabilities arising out of the operation of these facilities;
significant capital expenditures relating to maintenance, operation, security, and repair of these facilities, including repairs and upgrades required by the NRC;
the threat of a possible terrorist attack, including a potentialactual or threatened cyber security attack;intrusions or physical attacks; and
the potential impact of an accident or natural disaster.
It is possible that damages, decommissioning, or other costs could exceed the amount of decommissioning trusts or external insurance coverage, including statutorily required nuclear incident insurance.
The NRC has broad authority under federal law to impose licensing and safety-related requirements for the operation of nuclear generation facilities. In the event of non-compliance, the NRC has the authority to impose fines and/or shut down any unit, depending upon its assessment of the severity of the situation, until compliance is achieved. NRC orders or regulations related to increased security measures and any future safety requirements promulgated by the NRC could require Alabama Power and Georgia Power to make substantial operating and capital expenditures at their nuclear plants. In addition, if a serious nuclear incident were to occur, it could result in substantial costs to Alabama Power or Georgia Power and Southern Company. A major incident at a nuclear facility anywhere in the world could cause the NRC to delay or prohibit construction of new nuclear units or require additional safety measures at new and existing units. Moreover, a major incident at any nuclear facility in the U.S., including facilities owned and operated by third parties, could require Alabama Power and Georgia Power to make material contributory payments.
In addition, actual or potential terrorist threats of cyber intrusions or physical attacks could result in increased nuclear licensing or compliance costs that are difficult to predict.
Transporting and storing natural gas involves risks that may result in accidents and other operating risks and costs.
Southern Company Gas' natural gas distribution and storage activities involve a variety of inherent hazards and operating risks, such as leaks, accidents, explosions, and mechanical problems, which could result in serious injury to employees and non-employees, loss of human life, significant damage to property, environmental pollution, and impairment of its operations. The location of pipelines and storage facilities near populated areas could increase the level of damage resulting from these risks. Additionally, these pipeline and storage facilities are subject to various state and other regulatory requirements. Failure to comply with these regulatory requirements could result in substantial monetary penalties or potential early retirement of storage facilities, which could trigger an associated impairment. The occurrence of any of these events not fully covered by insurance or otherwise could adversely affect Southern Company Gas' and Southern Company's financial condition and results of operations.
Physical attacks, both threatened and actual, could impact the ability of the traditional electric operating companies, Southern Power, and Southern Company GasSubsidiary Registrants to operate and could adversely affect financial results and liquidity.
The traditional electric operating companies, Southern Power, and Southern Company GasSubsidiary Registrants face the risk of physical attacks, both threatened and actual, against their respective generation and storage facilities and the transmission and distribution infrastructure used to transport energy, which could negatively impact

I-22

Table of ContentsIndex to Financial Statements

their ability to generate, transport, and deliver power, or otherwise operate their respective facilities, or, with respect to Southern Company Gas, its ability to distribute or store natural gas, or otherwise operate its facilities, in the most efficient manner or at all. In addition, physical attacks against key suppliers or servicethird-party providers could have a similar effect on Southern Company and its subsidiaries.
Despite the implementation of robust security measures, all assets are potentially vulnerable to disability, failures, or unauthorized access due to human error, natural disasters, technological failure, or internal or external physical attacks. If assets were to fail, be physically damaged, or be breached and were not recoveredrestored in a timely way,manner, the traditional electric operating companies, Southern Power, or Southern Company Gas, as applicable,affected Subsidiary Registrant may be unable to fulfill critical business functions. Moreover, the amount and scope of insurance maintained against losses resulting from any such events or physical security breaches may not be sufficient to cover losses or otherwise adequately compensate for any disruptions to business that could result.
These events could harm the reputation of and negatively affect the financial results of the registrants through lost revenues and costs to repair damage, if such costs cannot be recovered.
An information security incident, including a cybersecurity breach, or the failure of one or more key information technology systems, networks, or processes could impact the ability of the registrants to operate and could adversely affect financial results and liquidity.
Information security risks have generally increased in recent years as a result of the proliferation of new technology and increased sophistication and frequency of cyber attacks and data security breaches. The traditional electric operating

I-24

Table of ContentsIndex to Financial Statements

companies, Southern Power, and Southern Company GasSubsidiary Registrants operate in highly regulated industries that require the continued operation of sophisticated information technology systems and network infrastructure, which are part of interconnected distribution systems. Because of the critical nature of the infrastructure, increased connectivity to the internet, and technology systems' inherent vulnerability to disability or failures due to hacking, viruses, acts of war or terrorism, or other types of data security breaches, Southern Company and its subsidiaries face a heightened risk of cyberattack. Parties that wish to disrupt the U.S. bulk power system or Southern Company system operations could view these computer systems, software, or networks as targets. The registrants and their third-party vendors have been subject, and will likely continue to be subject, to attempts to gain unauthorized access to their information technology systems and confidential data or to attempts to disrupt utility operations. As a result, Southern Company and its subsidiaries face on-going threats to their assets, including assets deemed critical infrastructure, where databases and systems have been, and will likely continue to be, subject to advanced computer viruses or other malicious codes, unauthorized access attempts, phishing, and other cyber attacks. While there have been immaterial incidents of phishing and attempted financial fraud across the Southern Company system, there has been no material impact on business or operations from these attacks,attacks. However, the registrants cannot guarantee that security efforts will prevent breaches, operational incidents, or other breakdowns of information technology systems and network infrastructure.infrastructure and cannot provide any assurance that such incidents will not have a material adverse effect in the future.
In addition, in the ordinary course of business, Southern Company and its subsidiaries collect and retain sensitive information, including personally identifiable information about customers, employees, and stockholders, and other confidential information. In some cases, administration of certain functions may be outsourced to third partythird-party service providers that could also be targets of cyber attacks. Generally, Southern Company and its subsidiaries enter certain contractual security guarantees and assurances with these third parties to help ensure the security and safety of this information.
Despite the implementation of robust security measures, all assets are potentially vulnerable to disability, failures, or unauthorized access due to human error, natural disasters, technological failure, or internal or external cyber attacks. If assets were to fail or be breached and were not recoveredrestored in a timely way,manner, the affected registrant may be unable to fulfill critical business functions, and sensitive and other data could be compromised. Any cyber breach or theft, damage, or improper disclosure of sensitive electronic data may also subject the affected registrant to penalties and claims from regulators or other third parties. Moreover, the amount and scope of insurance maintained against losses resulting from any such events or security breaches may not be sufficient to cover losses or otherwise adequately compensate for any disruptions to business that could result. In addition, as cybercriminals become more sophisticated, the cost of proactive defensive measures may increase.
These events could negatively affect the financial results of the registrants through lost revenues, costs to recover and repair damage, and costs associated with governmental actions in response to such attacks, and litigation and reputational damagecosts if such costs cannot be recovered through insurance or otherwise.
The Southern Company system may not be able to obtain adequate natural gas, fuel supplies, and other fuel suppliesresources required to operate the traditional electric operating companies' and Southern Power's electric generating plants or serve Southern Company Gas' natural gas customers.
The traditional electric operating companies and Southern Power purchase fuel, including coal, natural gas, uranium, fuel oil, and biomass, as applicable, from a number of suppliers. Additionally, the traditional electric operating companies and Southern

I-23

Table of ContentsIndex to Financial Statements

Power need adequate access to water, which is drawn from nearby sources to aid in the production of electricity and, once it is used, returned to its source. Disruption in the delivery of fuel, including disruptions as a result of, among other things, transportation delays, weather, labor relations, force majeure events, or environmental regulations affecting any of these fuel suppliers, or the availability of water, could limit the ability of the traditional electric operating companies and Southern Power to operate certain facilities, which could result in higher fuel and operating costs and potentially reduce the net income of the affected traditional electric operating company or Southern Power and Southern Company.
Southern Company Gas' primary business is the distribution and sale of natural gas through its regulated and unregulated subsidiaries. Natural gas supplies can be subject to disruption in the event production or distribution is curtailed, such as in the event of a hurricane or a pipeline failure. Southern Company Gas also relies on natural gas pipelines and other storage and transportation facilities owned and operated by third parties to deliver natural gas to wholesale markets and to Southern Company Gas' distribution systems. The availability of shale gas and potential regulations affecting its accessibility may have a material impact on the supply and cost of natural gas. Disruption in natural gas supplies could limit the ability to fulfill these contractual obligations.
The traditional electric operating companies and Southern Power have become more dependent on natural gas for a portion of their electric generating capacity.capacity and expect to continue to increase such dependence. In many instances, the cost of purchased power for the traditional electric operating companies and Southern Power is influenced by natural gas prices. Historically, natural gas prices have been more volatile than prices of other fuels. In recent years, domestic natural gas prices have been depressed by robust supplies, including production from shale gas. These market conditions, together with additional regulation of coal-fired generating units, have increased the traditional electric operating companies' reliance on natural gas-fired generating units.
The traditional electric operating companies are also dependent on coal for a portion of their electric generating capacity. The traditional electric operating companies depend on coal supply contracts, and the counterparties to these agreements may not fulfill their obligations to supply coal to the traditional electric operating companies. The suppliers may experience financial or

I-25

Table of ContentsIndex to Financial Statements

technical problems that inhibit their ability to fulfill their obligations. In addition, the suppliers may not be required to supply coal under certain circumstances, such as in the event of a natural disaster. If the traditional electric operating companies are unable to obtain their coal requirements under these contracts, they may be required to purchase their coal requirements at higher prices, which may not be recoverable through rates.
The revenues of Southern Company, the traditional electric operating companies, and Southern Power depend in part on sales under PPAs. The failure of a counterparty to one of these PPAs to perform its obligations, the failure of the traditional electric operating companies or Southern Power to satisfy minimum requirements under the PPAs, or the failure to renew the PPAs or successfully remarket the related generating capacity could have a negative impact on the net income and cash flows of the affected traditional electric operating company or Southern Power and of Southern Company.
Most of Southern Power's generating capacity has been sold to purchasers under PPAs. Southern Power's top three customers, Georgia Power, Duke Energy Corporation, and Morgan Stanley Capital GroupSouthern California Edison accounted for 11.3%9.8%, 6.7%6.8%, and 4.5%6.2%, respectively, of Southern Power's total revenues for the year ended December 31, 2017.2018. In addition, the traditional electric operating companies enter into PPAs with non-affiliated parties. Revenues are dependent on the continued performance by the purchasers of their obligations under these PPAs. The failure of one of the purchasers to perform its obligations, including as a result of a general default or bankruptcy, could have a negative impact on the net income and cash flows of the affected traditional electric operating company or Southern Power and of Southern Company. Although the credit evaluations undertaken and contractual protections implemented by Southern Power and the traditional electric operating companies take into account the possibility of default by a purchaser, actual exposure to a default by a purchaser may be greater than predicted or specified in the applicable contract. See Note 1 to the financial statements under "RevenuesConcentration of Revenue" in Item 8 herein for additional information on Pacific Gas & Electric Company's bankruptcy filing.
Additionally, neither Southern Power nor any traditional electric operating company can predict whether the PPAs will be renewed at the end of their respective terms or on what terms any renewals may be made. The failure of the traditional electric operating companies or Southern Power to satisfy minimum operational or availability requirements under these PPAs could result in payment of damages or termination of the PPAs.
The asset management arrangements between Southern Company Gas' wholesale gas services and its customers, including the natural gas distribution utilities, may not be renewed or may be renewed at lower levels, which could have a significant impact on Southern Company Gas' financial results.
Southern Company Gas' wholesale gas services currently manages the storage and transportation assets of the natural gas distribution utilities except(except Nicor Gas. Gas) as well as certain non-affiliated customers. Southern Company Gas' wholesale gas

I-24

Table of ContentsIndex to Financial Statements

services has a concentration of credit risk for services it provides to its counterparties, which is generally concentrated in 20 of its counterparties.
The profits earned from the management of these affiliate assets are shared with the respective affiliate's customers (and for Atlanta Gas Light Company with the Georgia PSC's Universal Service Fund), except for Chattanooga Gas Company and Elkton Gas where wholesale gas services are provided under annual fixed-fee agreements. These asset management agreements are subject to regulatory approval and such agreements may not be renewed or may be renewed with less favorable terms.
The financial results of Southern Company Gas' wholesale gas services also has asset management agreements with certain non-affiliated customers and its financial results could be significantly impacted if theseany of its agreements with its affiliated or non-affiliated customers are not renewed or are amended or renewed with less favorable terms. Sustained low natural gas prices could reduce the demand for these types of asset management arrangements.
Increased competition could negatively impact Southern Company's and its subsidiaries' revenues, results of operations, and financial condition.
The Southern Company system faces increasing competition from other companies that supply energy or generation and storage technologies. Changes in technology may make the Southern Company system's electric generating facilities owned by the traditional electric operating companies and Southern Power less competitive. Southern Company Gas' business is dependent on natural gas prices remaining competitive as compared to other forms of energy. Southern Company Gas also faces competition in its unregulated markets.
A key element of the business models of the traditional electric operating companies and Southern Power is that generating power at central station power plants achieves economies of scale and produces power at a competitive cost. There are distributed generation and storage technologies that produce and store power, including fuel cells, microturbines, wind turbines, solar cells, and batteries. Advances in technology or changes in laws or regulations could reduce the cost of these or other alternative methods of producing power to a level that is competitive with that of most central station power electric production or result in smaller-scale, more fuel efficient, and/or more cost effective distributed generation that allows for increased self-generation by customers. Broader use of distributed generation by retail energy customers may also result from customers' changing perceptions of the merits of utilizing existing generation technology or tax or other economic incentives. Additionally, a state PSC or legislature may modify certain aspects of the traditional electric operating companies' business as a result of these advances in technology.

I-26

Table of ContentsIndex to Financial Statements

It is also possible that rapid advances in central station power generation technology could reduce the value of the current electric generating facilities owned by the traditional electric operating companies and Southern Power. Changes in technology could also alter the channels through which electric customers buy or utilize power, which could reduce the revenues or increase the expenses of Southern Company, the traditional electric operating companies, or Southern Power.
Southern Company Gas' gas marketing services is affected by competition from other energy marketers providing similar services in Southern Company Gas' service territories, most notably in Illinois and Georgia. Southern Company Gas' wholesale gas services competes for sales with national and regional full-service energy providers, energy merchants and producers, and pipelines based on the ability to aggregate competitively-priced commodities with transportation and storage capacity. Southern Company Gas competes with natural gas facilities in the Gulf Coast region of the U.S., as the majority of the existing and proposed high deliverability salt-dome natural gas storage facilities in North America are located in the Gulf Coast region.
If new technologies become cost competitive and achieve sufficient scale, the market share of the traditional electric operating companies, Southern Power, and Southern Company GasSubsidiary Registrants could be eroded, and the value of their respective electric generating facilities or natural gas distribution and storage facilities could be reduced. Additionally, Southern Company Gas' market share could be reduced if Southern Company Gas cannot remain price competitive in its unregulated markets. If state PSCs or other applicable state regulatory agencies fail to adjust rates to reflect the impact of any changes in loads, increasing self-generation, and the growth of distributed generation, the financial condition, results of operations, and cash flows of Southern Company and the affected traditional electric operating company or Southern Company Gas could be materially adversely affected.
Failure to attract and retain an appropriately qualified workforce could negatively impact Southern Company's and its subsidiaries' results of operations.
Events such as an aging workforce without appropriate replacements, mismatch of skill sets to future needs, or unavailability of contract resources may lead to operating challenges such as lack of resources, loss of knowledge, and a lengthy time period associated with skill development, including with the workforce needs associated with major construction projects and ongoing operations. The Southern Company system's costs, including costs for contractors to replace employees, productivity costs, and safety costs, may rise. Failure to hire and adequately obtain replacement employees, including the ability to transfer significant internal historical knowledge and expertise to the new employees, or the future availability and cost of contract labor may adversely affect Southern Company and its subsidiaries' ability to manage and operate their businesses. If Southern Company

I-25

Table of ContentsIndex to Financial Statements

and its subsidiaries are unable to successfully attract and retain an appropriately qualified workforce, results of operations could be negatively impacted.
CONSTRUCTION RISKS
The registrants may incur additional costs or delays in the construction of new plants or other facilities and may not be able to recover their investments. Also, existing facilities of the traditional electric operating companies, Southern Power, and Southern Company GasSubsidiary Registrants require ongoing capital expenditures, including those to meet AROs and other environmental standards.standards and goals.
General
The businesses of the registrants require substantial capital expenditures for investments in new facilities and, for the traditional electric operating companies, capital improvements to transmission, distribution, and generation facilities, for Southern Power, capital improvements to generation facilities, and, for Southern Company Gas, capital improvements to natural gas distribution and storage facilities, includingfacilities. These expenditures also include those to meet AROs and environmental standards.standards and goals. Certain of the traditional electric operating companies and Southern Power are in the process of constructing new generating facilities and adding environmental controls equipment at existing generating facilities. Southern Company Gas is replacing certain pipelines in its natural gas distribution system and is involved in two new gas pipeline construction projects. The Southern Company system intends to continue its strategy of developing and constructing other new facilities, expanding or updating existing facilities, and adding environmental control equipment. These types of projects are long term in nature and in some cases may include the development and construction of facilities with designs that have not been finalized or previously constructed. The completion of these types of projects without delays or significant cost overruns is subject to substantial risks, including:
shortages, andincreased costs, or inconsistent quality of equipment, materials, and labor;
changes in labor costs, availability, and productivity;
challenges related to management of contractors, subcontractors, or vendors;
work stoppages;
contractor or supplier delay or delay;
non-performance under construction, operating, or other agreements or non-performance by other major participants in construction projects;agreements;
delays in or failure to receive necessary permits, approvals, tax credits, and other regulatory authorizations;
delays associated within start-up activities including(including major equipment failure and system integration,integration) and/or operational performance (including additional costs to satisfy any operational parameters ultimately adopted by any PSC or other applicable state regulatory agency);

I-27

Table of ContentsIndex to Financial Statements

performance;
operational readiness, including specialized operator training and required site safety programs;
impacts of new and existing laws and regulations, including environmental laws and regulations;
the outcome of any legal challenges to projects, including legal challenges to regulatory approvals;
failure to construct in accordance with permitting and licensing requirements;requirements (including satisfaction of NRC requirements);
failure to satisfy any environmental performance standards and the requirements of tax credits and other incentives;
continued public and policymaker support for such projects;
adverse weather conditions or natural disasters;
other unforeseen engineering or design problems;
changes in project design or scope;
environmental and geological conditions;
delays or increased costs to interconnect facilities to transmission grids; and
unanticipated cost increases, including materials and labor, and increased financing costs as a result of changes in market interest rates or as a result of construction scheduleproject delays.
If a traditional electric operating company, Southern Power, or Southern Company GasSubsidiary Registrant is unable to complete the development or construction of a project or decides to delay or cancel construction of a project, it may not be able to recover its investment in that project and may incur substantial cancellation payments under equipment purchase orders or construction contracts. contracts, as well as other costs associated with the closure and/or abandonment of the construction project. See Note 2 to the financial statements under "Kemper County Energy Facility" for information related to the abandonment of and related closure activities and costs for the mine and gasifier-related assets at the Kemper County energy facility.
Additionally, each Southern Company Gas pipeline construction project involves separate joint venture participants, Southern Power participates in partnership agreements with respect to renewable energy projects, and Georgia Power jointly owns Plant Vogtle Units 3 and 4 with other co-owners. Any failure by a partner or co-owner to perform its obligations under the applicable agreements could have a material negative impact on the applicable project under construction. In addition, partnership and joint ownership agreements may provide partners or co-owners with certain decision-making authority in connection with projects under construction.construction, including rights to cause the cancellation of a construction project under certain circumstances.
Even if a construction project (including a joint venture construction project) is completed, the total costs may be higher than estimated and may not be recoverable through regulated rates, if applicable. In addition, construction delays and contractor

I-26

Table of ContentsIndex to Financial Statements

performance shortfalls can result in the loss of revenues and may, in turn, adversely affect the net income and financial position of the affected registrant. See Note 2 to the financial statements under "FERC Matters – Southern Company Gas" for information regarding the Atlantic Coast Pipeline construction delays and the associated cost increase.
Construction delays could result in the loss of otherwise available investment tax credits PTCs, and other tax incentives. Furthermore, if construction projects are not completed according to specification, a traditional electric operating company, Southern Power, or Southern Company Gas and Southern Companyregistrant may incur liabilities and suffer reduced plant efficiency, higher operating costs, and reduced net income.
Once facilities become operational, ongoing capital expenditures are required to maintain reliable levels of operation. Significant portions of the traditional electric operating companies' existing facilities were constructed many years ago. Older equipment, even if maintained in accordance with good engineering practices, may require significant capital expenditures to maintain efficiency, to comply with changing environmental requirements, or to provide safe and reliable operations.operations, and/or to meet related retirement obligations.
The largest construction project currently underway in the Southern Company system is Plant Vogtle Units 3 and 4.
Plant Vogtle Units 3 and 4 construction and rate recovery
Background
In 2009, the Georgia PSC certified construction of Plant Vogtle Units 3 and 4. Georgia Power holds a 45.7% ownership interest in Plant Vogtle Units 3 and 4. In 2012, the NRC issued the related combined construction and operating licenses, which allowed full construction of the two AP1000 nuclear units (with electric generating capacity of approximately 1,100 MWs each) and related facilities to begin. Until March 2017, construction on Plant Vogtle Units 3 and 4 continued under the Vogtle 3 and 4 Agreement, which was a substantially fixed price engineering, procurement, and construction agreement, pursuant to which the EPC Contractor agreed to design, engineer, procure, construct, and test Plant Vogtle Units 3 and 4. Onagreement. In March 29, 2017, the EPC Contractor filed for bankruptcy protection under Chapter 11 of the U.S. Bankruptcy Code.
In connection with the EPC Contractor's bankruptcy filing, Georgia Power, acting for itself and as agent for the Vogtle Owners, entered into an agreementthe Interim Assessment Agreement with the EPC Contractor to allow construction to continue (Interim Assessment Agreement).continue. The Interim Assessment Agreement expired onin July 27, 2017 upon the effectiveness of a services agreement between the Vogtle Owners and the EPC Contractor for the EPC Contractor to transition construction management of Plant Vogtle Units 3 and 4 to Southern Nuclear and to provide ongoing design, engineering, and procurement services to Southern Nuclear (Vogtle Services Agreement). In August 2017, following completion of comprehensive cost to complete and cancellation cost assessments,when Georgia Power, filed its seventeenth Vogtle Construction Monitoring (VCM) report with the Georgia PSC, which included a recommendation to continue construction of Plant Vogtle Units 3 and 4, with Southern Nuclear serving as project manager and Bechtel Power Corporation (Bechtel) serving as the primary construction contractor. Facility design and engineering remains the responsibility of the EPC Contractor under the Vogtle Services Agreement. The construction completion agreement between Georgia Power,acting for itself and as agent for the other Vogtle Owners, and the EPC Contractor entered into the Vogtle Services Agreement. Under the Vogtle Services Agreement, Westinghouse provides facility design and engineering services, procurement and technical support, and staff augmentation on a time and materials cost basis.
In October 2017, Georgia Power, acting for itself and as agent for the other Vogtle Owners, executed the Bechtel (Bechtel Agreement) isAgreement, a cost reimbursable plus

I-28

Table of ContentsIndex to Financial Statements

fee arrangement, whereby Bechtel will beis reimbursed for actual costs plus a base fee and an at-risk fee, which is subject to adjustment based on Bechtel's performance against cost and schedule targets.
On November 2, 2017,Cost and Schedule
Georgia Power's approximate proportionate share of the Vogtle Owners entered into an amendmentremaining estimated capital cost to their joint ownership agreements forcomplete Plant Vogtle Units 3 and 4 (as amended, Vogtle Joint Ownership Agreements) to provide for, among other conditions, additional Vogtle Owner approval requirements. Pursuant toby the Vogtle Joint Ownership Agreements, the holdersexpected in-service dates of at least 90% of the ownership interests in Plant Vogtle Units 3 and 4 must vote to continue construction if certain adverse events occur, including (i) the bankruptcy of Toshiba Corporation; (ii) termination or rejection in bankruptcy of certain agreements, including the Vogtle Services Agreement or the Bechtel Agreement; (iii) the Georgia PSC or Georgia Power determines that any of Georgia Power's costs relating to the construction of Plant Vogtle Units 3 and 4 will not be recovered in retail rates because such costs are deemed unreasonable or imprudent; or (iv) an increase in the construction budget contained in the seventeenth VCM report of more than $1 billion or extension of the project schedule contained in the seventeenth VCM report of more than one year. In addition, pursuant to the Vogtle Joint Ownership Agreements, the required approval of holders of ownership interests in Plant Vogtle Units 3 and 4 is at least (i) 90% for a change of the primary construction contractor and (ii) 67% for material amendments to the Vogtle Services Agreement or agreements with Southern Nuclear or the primary construction contractor, including the Bechtel Agreement.
On December 21, 2017, the Georgia PSC voted to approve (and issued its related order on January 11, 2018) Georgia Power's recommendation to continue construction and resolved the following regulatory matters related to Plant Vogtle Units 3 and 4: (i) none of the $3.3 billion of costs incurred through December 31, 2015 and reflected in the fourteenth VCM report should be disallowed from rate base on the basis of imprudence; (ii) the December 31, 2015 agreement between Westinghouse and the Vogtle Owners resolving disputes between the Vogtle Owners and the EPC Contractor under the original engineering, procurement, and construction agreement for Plant Vogtle Units 3 and 4 (Contractor Settlement Agreement) was reasonable and prudent and none of the amounts paid pursuant to the Contractor Settlement Agreement should be disallowed from rate base on the basis of imprudence; (iii) (a) capital costs incurred up to $5.680 billion would be presumed to be reasonable and prudent with the burden of proof on any party challenging such costs, (b) Georgia Power would have the burden to show that any capital costs above $5.680 billion were prudent, and (c) a revised capital cost forecast of $7.3 billion (after reflecting the impact of payments received under the Guarantee Settlement Agreement and the Customer Refunds, each as defined below) is found reasonable; (iv) construction of Plant Vogtle Units 3 and 4 should be completed, with Southern Nuclear serving as project manager and Bechtel as primary contractor; (v) approved and deemed reasonable Georgia Power's revised schedule placing Plant Vogtle Units 3 and 4 in service in November 2021 and November 2022, respectively; (vi) confirmed that the revised cost forecast does not represent a cost cap and that prudence decisions on cost recovery will be made at a later date, consistent with applicable Georgia law; (vii) reduced the return on equity (ROE) used to calculate the Nuclear Construction Cost Recovery (NCCR) tariff (a) from 10.95% (the ROE rate setting point authorized by the Georgia PSC in the 2013 Alternative Rate Plan) to 10.00% effective January 1, 2016, (b) from 10.00% to 8.30%, effective January 1, 2020, and (c) from 8.30% to 5.30%, effective January 1, 2021 (provided that the ROE in no case will be less than Georgia Power's average cost of long-term debt); (viii) reduced the ROE used for allowance for funds used during construction equity for Plant Vogtle Units 3 and 4 from 10.00% to Georgia Power's average cost of long-term debt, effective January 1, 2018; and (ix) agreed that upon Unit 3 reaching commercial operation, retail base rates would be adjusted to include carrying costs on those capital costs deemed prudent in the settlement agreement approved by the Georgia PSC on December 20, 2016. The January 11, 2018 order also stated that if Plant Vogtle Units 3 and 4 are not commercially operational by June 1, 2021 and June 1, 2022, respectively, the ROE used to calculate the NCCR tariff will be further reduced by 10 basis points each month (but not lower than Georgia Power's average cost of long-term debt) until the respective unit is commercially operational. In its January 11, 2018 order, the Georgia PSC stated if other certain conditions and assumptions upon which Georgia Power's seventeenth VCM report are based do not materialize, both Georgia Power and the Georgia PSC reserve the right to reconsider the decision to continue construction.as follows:
On February 12, 2018, Georgia Interfaith Power & Light, Inc. and Partnership for Southern Equity, Inc. filed a petition appealing the Georgia PSC's January 11, 2018 order with the Fulton County Superior Court. Georgia Power believes the appeal has no merit; however, an adverse outcome in this appeal could have a material impact on Southern Company's and Georgia Power's results of operations, financial condition, and liquidity.
Georgia Power expects Plant Vogtle Units 3 and 4 to be placed in service by November 2021 and November 2022, respectively. Georgia Power's revised capital cost forecast for its 45.7% proportionate share of Plant Vogtle Units 3 and 4 is $8.8 billion ($7.3 billion after reflecting the impact of payments received under a settlement agreement regarding Toshiba's guarantee of certain obligations of the EPC Contractor (Guarantee Settlement Agreement) and certain refunds to customers ordered by the Georgia PSC (Customer Refunds)). Georgia Power's construction work in progress balance for Plant Vogtle Units 3 and 4 was $3.3 billion at December 31, 2017, which is net of the Guarantee Settlement Agreement payments less the Customer Refunds.
 (in billions)
Base project capital cost forecast(a)(b)
$8.0
Construction contingency estimate0.4
Total project capital cost forecast(a)(b)
8.4
Net investment as of December 31, 2018(b)
(4.6)
Remaining estimate to complete(a)
$3.8
(a)Excludes financing costs expected to be capitalized through AFUDC of approximately $315 million.
(b)Net of $1.7 billion received from Toshiba under the Guarantee Settlement Agreement and approximately $188 million in related Customer Refunds.
Georgia Power estimates that its financing costs for construction of Plant Vogtle Units 3 and 4 will total approximately $3.1 billion, of which $1.6$1.9 billion had been incurred through December 31, 2017.2018.
As construction continues, challenges with management of contractors, subcontractors, and vendors; labor productivity, availability, and/or cost escalation; procurement, fabrication, delivery, assembly, and/or installation and testing, including any required engineering changes, of plant systems, structures, and components (some of which are based on new technology that only recently began initial operation in the global nuclear industry at this scale); or other issues could arise and change the projected schedule and estimated cost. Monthly construction production targets required to maintain the current project schedule will continue to increase significantly throughout 2019. To meet these increasing monthly targets, existing craft construction productivity must improve and additional craft laborers must be retained and deployed.

I-29I-27

    Table of Contents                                Index to Financial Statements

AsGeorgia Power and Southern Nuclear believe it is a leading practice in connection with a construction continues, challenges with managementproject of contractors, subcontractors,this size and vendors, labor productivity and availability, fabrication, delivery, assembly, and installation of plant systems, structures, and components (some of which are based on new technology and have not yet operatedcomplexity to periodically validate recent construction progress in the global nuclear industry at this scale), or other issues could arise and changecomparison to the projected schedule and to verify and update quantities of commodities remaining to install, labor productivity, and forecasted staffing needs. This verification process, led by Southern Nuclear, was underway as of December 31, 2018 and is expected to be completed during the second quarter 2019. Georgia Power currently does not anticipate any material changes to the total estimated cost.project capital cost forecast for Plant Vogtle Units 3 and 4 or the expected in-service dates of November 2021 and November 2022, respectively, resulting from this verification process. However, the ultimate impact on cost and schedule, if any, will not be known until the verification process is completed. Georgia Power is required to report the results and any project impacts to the Georgia PSC by May 15, 2019.
There have been technical and procedural challenges to the construction and licensing of Plant Vogtle Units 3 and 4 at the federal and state level and additional challenges may arise. Processes are in place that are designed to assure compliance with the requirements specified in the Westinghouse Design Control Document and the combined construction and operating licenses, including inspections by Southern Nuclear and the NRC that occur throughout construction. As a result of such compliance processes, certain license amendment requests have been filed and approved or are pending before the NRC. Various design and other licensing-based compliance matters, including the timely resolution of Inspections, Tests, Analyses, and Acceptance CriteriaITAAC and the related approvals by the NRC, may arise, which may result in additional license amendments or require other resolution. If any license amendment requests or other licensing-based compliance issues are not resolved in a timely manner, there may be delays in the project schedule that could result in increased costs.
The ultimate outcome of these matters cannot be determined at this time. However, any extension of the project schedule is currently estimated to result in additional base capital costs of approximately $50 million per month, based on Georgia Power's ownership interests, and AFUDC of approximately $12 million per month. While Georgia Power is not precluded from seeking recovery of any future capital cost forecast increase, management will ultimately determine whether or not to seek recovery. Any further changes to the capital cost forecast that are not expected to be recoverable through regulated rates will be required to be charged to income and such charges could be material.
Joint Owner Contracts
In November 2017, the Vogtle Owners entered into an amendment to their joint ownership agreements for Plant Vogtle Units 3 and 4 to provide for, among other conditions, additional Vogtle Owner approval requirements. Effective August 31, 2018, the Vogtle Owners further amended the joint ownership agreements to clarify and provide procedures for certain provisions of the joint ownership agreements related to adverse events that require the vote of the holders of at least 90% of the ownership interests in Plant Vogtle Units 3 and 4 to continue construction (as amended, and together with the November 2017 amendment, the Vogtle Joint Ownership Agreements).
As a result of the increase in the total project capital cost forecast and Georgia Power's decision not to seek rate recovery of the increase in the base capital costs as described below, the holders of at least 90% of the ownership interests in Plant Vogtle Units 3 and 4 were required to vote to continue construction. On September 26, 2018, the Vogtle Owners unanimously voted to continue construction of Plant Vogtle Units 3 and 4.
Amendments to the Vogtle Joint Ownership Agreements
In connection with the vote to continue construction, Georgia Power entered into (i) a binding term sheet (Vogtle Owner Term Sheet) with the other Vogtle Owners and MEAG's wholly-owned subsidiaries MEAG Power SPVJ, LLC (MEAG SPVJ), MEAG Power SPVM, LLC (MEAG SPVM), and MEAG Power SPVP, LLC (MEAG SPVP) to take certain actions which partially mitigate potential financial exposure for the other Vogtle Owners, including additional amendments to the Vogtle Joint Ownership Agreements and the purchase of PTCs from the other Vogtle Owners, and (ii) a term sheet (MEAG Term Sheet) with MEAG and MEAG SPVJ to provide funding with respect to MEAG SPVJ's ownership interest in Plant Vogtle Units 3 and 4 (Project J) under certain circumstances. On January 14, 2019, Georgia Power, MEAG, and MEAG SPVJ entered into an agreement to implement the provisions of the MEAG Term Sheet (MEAG Funding Agreement). On February 18, 2019, Georgia Power, the other Vogtle Owners, and MEAG's wholly-owned subsidiaries MEAG SPVJ, MEAG SPVM, and MEAG SPVP entered into certain amendments to the Vogtle Joint Ownership Agreements to implement the provisions of the Vogtle Owner Term Sheet (Global Amendments).
Pursuant to the Global Amendments, and consistent with the Vogtle Owner Term Sheet, the Vogtle Joint Ownership Agreements were modified as follows: (i) each Vogtle Owner must pay its proportionate share of qualifying construction costs for Plant Vogtle Units 3 and 4 based on its ownership percentage up to the estimated cost at completion (EAC) for Plant Vogtle Units 3 and 4 which formed the basis of Georgia Power's forecast of $8.4 billion in the nineteenth VCM plus $800 million; (ii) Georgia Power will be responsible for 55.7% of actual qualifying construction costs between $800 million and $1.6 billion over the EAC in the nineteenth VCM (resulting in $80 million of potential additional costs to Georgia Power), with the remaining Vogtle Owners responsible for 44.3% of such costs pro rata in accordance with their respective ownership interests; and (iii) Georgia

I-28

Table of ContentsIndex to Financial Statements

Power will be responsible for 65.7% of qualifying construction costs between $1.6 billion and $2.1 billion over the EAC in the nineteenth VCM (resulting in a further $100 million of potential additional costs to Georgia Power), with the remaining Vogtle Owners responsible for 34.3% of such costs pro rata in accordance with their respective ownership interests.
If the EAC is revised and exceeds the EAC in the nineteenth VCM by more than $2.1 billion, each of the other Vogtle Owners will have a one-time option at the time the project budget forecast is so revised to tender a portion of its ownership interest to Georgia Power in exchange for Georgia Power's agreement to pay 100% of such Vogtle Owner's remaining share of total construction costs in excess of the EAC in the nineteenth VCM plus $2.1 billion. In this event, Georgia Power will have the option of cancelling the project in lieu of purchasing a portion of the ownership interest of any other Vogtle Owner. If Georgia Power accepts the offer to purchase a portion of another Vogtle Owner's ownership interest in Plant Vogtle Units 3 and 4, the ownership interest(s) to be conveyed from the tendering Vogtle Owner(s) to Georgia Power will be calculated based on the proportion of the cumulative amount of construction costs paid by each such tendering Vogtle Owner(s) and by Georgia Power as of the COD of Plant Vogtle Unit 4. For purposes of this calculation, payments made by Georgia Power on behalf of another Vogtle Owner in accordance with the second and third items described in the paragraph above will be treated as payments made by the applicable Vogtle Owner.
In the event the actual costs of construction at completion of a Unit are less than the EAC reflected in the nineteenth VCM report and such Unit is placed in service in accordance with the schedule projected in the nineteenth VCM report (i.e., Plant Vogtle Unit 3 is placed in service by November 2021 or Plant Vogtle Unit 4 is placed in service by November 2022), Georgia Power will be entitled to 60.7% of the cost savings with respect to the relevant Unit and the remaining Vogtle Owners will be entitled to 39.3% of such savings on a pro rata basis in accordance with their respective ownership interests.
For purposes of the foregoing provisions, qualifying construction costs will not include costs (i) resulting from force majeure events, including governmental actions or inactions (or significant delays associated with issuance of such actions) that affect the licensing, completion, start-up, operations, or financing of Plant Vogtle Units 3 and 4, administrative proceedings or litigation regarding ITAAC or other regulatory challenges to commencement of operation of Plant Vogtle Units 3 and 4, and changes in laws or regulations governing Plant Vogtle Units 3 and 4, (ii) legal fees and legal expenses incurred due to litigation with contractors or subcontractors that are not subsidiaries or affiliates of Southern Company, and (iii) additional costs caused by requests from the Vogtle Owners other than Georgia Power, except for the exercise of a right to vote granted under the Vogtle Joint Ownership Agreements, that increase costs by $100,000 or more.
Pursuant to the Global Amendments, and consistent with the Vogtle Owner Term Sheet, the provisions of the Vogtle Joint Ownership Agreements requiring that Vogtle Owners holding 90% of the ownership interests in Plant Vogtle Units 3 and 4 vote to continue construction following certain adverse events (Project Adverse Events) were modified. Pursuant to the Global Amendments, the holders of at least 90% of the ownership interests in Plant Vogtle Units 3 and 4 must vote to continue construction if certain Project Adverse Events occur, including: (i) the bankruptcy of Toshiba; (ii) the termination or rejection in bankruptcy of certain agreements, including the Vogtle Services Agreement, the Bechtel Agreement, or the agency agreement with Southern Nuclear; (iii) Georgia Power publicly announces its intention not to submit for rate recovery any portion of its investment in Plant Vogtle Units 3 and 4 or the Georgia PSC determines that any of Georgia Power's costs relating to the construction of Plant Vogtle Units 3 and 4 will not be recovered in retail rates, excluding any additional amounts paid by Georgia Power on behalf of the other Vogtle Owners pursuant to the Global Amendments described above and the first 6% of costs during any six-month VCM reporting period that are disallowed by the Georgia PSC for recovery, or for which Georgia Power elects not to seek cost recovery, through retail rates; and (iv) an incremental extension of one year or more over the most recently approved schedule. Under the Global Amendments, Georgia Power may cancel the project at any time in its sole discretion.
In addition, pursuant to the Vogtle Joint Ownership Agreements, the required approval of holders of ownership interests in Plant Vogtle Units 3 and 4 is at least (i) 90% for a change of the primary construction contractor and (ii) 67% for material amendments to the Vogtle Services Agreement or agreements with Southern Nuclear or the primary construction contractor, including the Bechtel Agreement.
The Global Amendments provide that if the holders of at least 90% of the ownership interests fail to vote in favor of continuing the project following any future Project Adverse Event, work on Plant Vogtle Units 3 and 4 will continue for a period of 30 days if the holders of more than 50% of the ownership interests vote in favor of continuing construction (Majority Voting Owners). In such a case, the Vogtle Owners (i) have agreed to negotiate in good faith towards the resumption of the project, (ii) if no agreement is reached during such 30-day period, the project will be cancelled, and (iii) in the event of such a cancellation, the Majority Voting Owners will be obligated to reimburse any other Vogtle Owner for the incremental costs it incurred during such 30-day negotiation period.

I-29

Table of ContentsIndex to Financial Statements

Purchase of PTCs During Commercial Operation
Pursuant to the Global Amendments, and consistent with the Vogtle Owner Term Sheet, Georgia Power has agreed to purchase additional PTCs from OPC, Dalton, MEAG SPVM, MEAG SPVP, and MEAG SPVJ (to the extent any MEAG SPVJ PTC rights remain after any purchases required under the MEAG Funding Agreement as described below) at varying purchase prices dependent upon the actual cost to complete construction of Plant Vogtle Units 3 and 4 as compared to the EAC reflected in the nineteenth VCM report. The purchases are at the option of the applicable Vogtle Owner.
Potential Funding to MEAG Project J
Pursuant to the MEAG Funding Agreement, and consistent with the MEAG Term Sheet, if MEAG SPVJ is unable to make its payments due under the Vogtle Joint Ownership Agreements solely as a result of the occurrence of one of the following situations that materially impedes access to capital markets for MEAG for Project J: (i) the conduct of JEA or the City of Jacksonville, such as JEA's legal challenges of its obligations under a PPA with MEAG (PPA-J), or (ii) PPA-J is declared void by a court of competent jurisdiction or rejected by JEA under the applicable provisions of the U.S. Bankruptcy Code (each of (i) and (ii), a JEA Default), at MEAG's request, Georgia Power will purchase from MEAG SPVJ the rights to PTCs attributable to MEAG SPVJ's share of Plant Vogtle Units 3 and 4 (approximately 206 MWs) within 30 days of such request at varying prices dependent upon the stage of construction of Plant Vogtle Units 3 and 4. The aggregate purchase price of the PTCs, together with any advances made as described in the next paragraph, shall not exceed $300 million.
At the option of MEAG, as an alternative or supplement to Georgia Power's purchase of PTCs as described above, Georgia Power has agreed to provide up to $250 million in funding to MEAG for Project J in the form of advances (either advances under the Vogtle Joint Ownership Agreements or the purchase of MEAG Project J bonds, at the discretion of Georgia Power), subject to any required approvals of the Georgia PSC and the DOE.
In the event MEAG SPVJ certifies to Georgia Power that it is unable to fund its obligations under the Vogtle Joint Ownership Agreements as a result of a JEA Default and Georgia Power becomes obligated to provide funding as described above, MEAG is required to (i) assign to Georgia Power its right to vote on any future Project Adverse Event and (ii) diligently pursue JEA for its breach of PPA-J. In addition, Georgia Power agreed that it will not sue MEAG for any amounts due from MEAG SPVJ under MEAG's guarantee of MEAG SPVJ's obligations so long as MEAG SPVJ complies with the terms of the MEAG Funding Agreement as to its payment obligations and the other non-payment provisions of the Vogtle Joint Ownership Agreements.
Under the terms of the MEAG Funding Agreement, Georgia Power may cancel the project in lieu of providing funding in the form of advances or PTC purchases.
Regulatory Matters
In December 2017, the Georgia PSC voted to approve (and issued its related order on January 11, 2018) Georgia Power's recommendation to continue construction and resolved the following regulatory matters related to Plant Vogtle Units 3 and 4: (i) none of the $3.3 billion of costs incurred through December 31, 2015 and reflected in the fourteenth VCM report should be disallowed from rate base on the basis of imprudence; (ii) the Contractor Settlement Agreement was reasonable and prudent and none of the amounts paid pursuant to the Contractor Settlement Agreement should be disallowed from rate base on the basis of imprudence; (iii) (a) capital costs incurred up to $5.68 billion would be presumed to be reasonable and prudent with the burden of proof on any party challenging such costs, (b) Georgia Power would have the burden to show that any capital costs above $5.68 billion were prudent, and (c) a revised capital cost forecast of $7.3 billion (after reflecting the impact of payments received under the Guarantee Settlement Agreement and related Customer Refunds) was found reasonable; (iv) construction of Plant Vogtle Units 3 and 4 should be completed, with Southern Nuclear serving as project manager and Bechtel as primary contractor; (v) approved and deemed reasonable Georgia Power's revised schedule placing Plant Vogtle Units 3 and 4 in service in November 2021 and November 2022, respectively; (vi) confirmed that the revised cost forecast does not represent a cost cap and that prudence decisions on cost recovery will be made at a later date, consistent with applicable Georgia law; (vii) reduced the ROE used to calculate the NCCR tariff (a) from 10.95% (the ROE rate setting point authorized by the Georgia PSC in the 2013 ARP) to 10.00% effective January 1, 2016, (b) from 10.00% to 8.30%, effective January 1, 2020, and (c) from 8.30% to 5.30%, effective January 1, 2021 (provided that the ROE in no case will be less than Georgia Power's average cost of long-term debt); (viii) reduced the ROE used for AFUDC equity for Plant Vogtle Units 3 and 4 from 10.00% to Georgia Power's average cost of long-term debt, effective January 1, 2018; and (ix) agreed that upon Unit 3 reaching commercial operation, retail base rates would be adjusted to include carrying costs on those capital costs deemed prudent in the Vogtle Cost Settlement Agreement. The January 11, 2018 order also stated that if Plant Vogtle Units 3 and 4 are not commercially operational by June 1, 2021 and June 1, 2022, respectively, the ROE used to calculate the NCCR tariff will be further reduced by 10 basis points each month (but not lower than Georgia Power's average cost of long-term debt) until the respective Unit is commercially operational. The ROE reductions negatively impacted earnings by approximately $100 million, $25 million, and $20 million in 2018, 2017, and 2016, respectively, and are estimated to have negative earnings impacts of approximately $75 million in 2019 and an aggregate of approximately $615 million from 2020 to 2022.

I-30

Table of ContentsIndex to Financial Statements

In its January 11, 2018 order, the Georgia PSC also stated if other conditions change and assumptions upon which Georgia Power's seventeenth VCM report are based do not materialize, the Georgia PSC reserved the right to reconsider the decision to continue construction.
On February 12, 2018, Georgia Interfaith Power & Light, Inc. (GIPL) and Partnership for Southern Equity, Inc. (PSE) filed a petition appealing the Georgia PSC's January 11, 2018 order with the Fulton County Superior Court. On March 8, 2018, Georgia Watch filed a similar appeal to the Fulton County Superior Court for judicial review of the Georgia PSC's decision and denial of Georgia Watch's motion for reconsideration. On December 21, 2018, the Fulton County Superior Court granted Georgia Power's motion to dismiss the two appeals. On January 9, 2019, GIPL, PSE, and Georgia Watch filed an appeal of this decision with the Georgia Court of Appeals. Georgia Power believes the appeal has no merit; however, an adverse outcome in the appeal combined with subsequent adverse action by the Georgia PSC could have a material impact on Southern Company's and Georgia Power's results of operations, financial condition, and liquidity.
In preparation for its nineteenth VCM filing, Georgia Power requested Southern Nuclear to perform a full cost reforecast for the project. This reforecast, performed prior to the nineteenth VCM filing, resulted in a $0.7 billion increase to the base capital cost forecast reported in the second quarter 2018. This base cost increase primarily resulted from changed assumptions related to the finalization of contract scopes and management responsibilities for Bechtel and over 60 subcontractors, labor productivity rates, and craft labor incentives, as well as the related levels of project management, oversight, and support, including field supervision and engineering support.
Although Georgia Power believes these incremental costs are reasonable and necessary to complete the project and the Georgia PSC's order in the seventeenth VCM proceeding specifically states that the construction of Plant Vogtle Units 3 and 4 is not subject to a cost cap, Georgia Power did not seek rate recovery for these cost increases included in the current base capital cost forecast (or any related financing costs) in the nineteenth VCM report. In connection with future VCM filings, Georgia Power may request the Georgia PSC to evaluate costs currently included in the construction contingency estimate for rate recovery as and when they are appropriately included in the base capital cost forecast. After considering the significant level of uncertainty that exists regarding the future recoverability of costs included in the construction contingency estimate since the ultimate outcome of these matters is subject to the outcome of future assessments by management, as well as Georgia PSC decisions in these future regulatory proceedings, Georgia Power recorded a total pre-tax charge to income of $1.1 billion ($0.8 billion after tax) in the second quarter 2018, which includes the total increase in the base capital cost forecast and construction contingency estimate.
The ultimate outcome of these matters cannot be determined at this time.
See Note 32 to the financial statements of Southern Company under "Nuclear Construction" and of Georgia"Georgia Power under "Retail Regulatory Matters - Nuclear Construction"Construction" in Item 8 herein for additional information regarding Plant Vogtle Units 3 and 4.
Southern Company Gas' significant investments in pipelines and pipeline development projects involve financial and execution risks.
Southern Company Gas has made significant investments in existing pipelines and pipeline development projects. Many of the existing pipelines are, and when completed many of the pipeline development projects will be, operated by third parties. If one of these agents fails to perform in a proper manner, the value of the investment could decline and Southern Company Gas could lose part or all of theits investment. In addition, from time to time, Southern Company Gas may be required to contribute additional capital to a pipeline joint venture or guarantee the obligations of such joint venture.
With respect to certain pipeline development projects, Southern Company Gas will rely on its joint venture partners for construction management and will not exercise direct control over the process. All of the pipeline development projects are dependent on contractors for the successful and timely completion of the projects. Further, the development of pipeline projects involves numerous regulatory, environmental, construction, safety, political, and legal uncertainties and may require the expenditure of significant amounts of capital. These projects may not be completed on schedule, at the budgeted cost, or at all. There may be cost overruns and construction difficulties that cause Southern Company Gas' capital expenditures to exceed its initial expectations. Moreover, Southern Company Gas' revenuesincome will not increase immediately upon the expenditure of funds on a pipeline project. Pipeline construction occurs over an extended period of time and Southern Company Gas will not receive material increases in revenuesincome until the project is placed in service.
Work continues with state and federal agencies to obtain the required permits to begin construction on the PennEast Pipeline. Any material delays may impact forecasted capital expenditures and the expected in-service date.
The Atlantic Coast Pipeline has experienced challenges to its permits since construction began in 2018. During the third and fourth quarters 2018, a FERC stop work order, together with delays in obtaining permits necessary for construction and construction delays due to judicial actions, impacted the cost and schedule for the project. As a result, total project cost estimates have increased and the operator of the joint venture currently expects to achieve a late 2020 in-service date for at least

I-31

Table of ContentsIndex to Financial Statements

key segments of the Atlantic Coast Pipeline, while the remainder may extend into early 2021. Abnormal weather, work delays (including due to judicial or regulatory action), and other conditions may result in additional cost or schedule modifications, which could result in an impairment of Southern Company Gas' investment and could have a material impact on Southern Company's and Southern Company Gas' financial statements.
The ultimate outcome of these matters cannot be determined at this time and the occurrence of these or any other of the foregoing events could adversely affect the results of operations, cash flows, and financial condition of Southern Company Gas and Southern Company.
FINANCIAL, ECONOMIC, AND MARKET RISKS
The electric generation and energy marketing operations of the traditional electric operating companies and Southern Power and the natural gas operations of Southern Company Gas are subject to risks, many of which are beyond their control, including changes in energy prices and fuel costs, which may reduce revenues and increase costs.
The generation, energy marketing, and natural gas operations of the Southern Company system are subject to changes in energy prices and fuel costs, which could increase the cost of producing power, decrease the amount received from the sale of energy, and/or make electric generating facilities less competitive. The market prices for these commodities may fluctuate significantly over relatively short periods of time. Among the factors that could influence energy prices and fuel costs are:
prevailing market prices for coal, natural gas, uranium, fuel oil, biomass, and other fuels, as applicable, used in the generation facilities of the traditional electric operating companies and Southern Power and, in the case of natural gas, distributed by Southern Company Gas, including associated transportation costs, and supplies of such commodities;
demand for energy and the extent of additional supplies of energy available from current or new competitors;
liquidity in the general wholesale electricity and natural gas markets;
weather conditions impacting demand for electricity and natural gas;
seasonality;
transmission or transportation constraints, disruptions, or inefficiencies;
availability of competitively priced alternative energy sources;
forced or unscheduled plant outages for the Southern Company system, its competitors, or third party providers;
the financial condition of market participants;

I-30

Table of ContentsIndex to Financial Statements

the economy in the Southern Company system's service territory, the nation, and worldwide, including the impact of economic conditions on demand for electricity and the demand for fuels, including natural gas;
natural disasters, wars, embargos, acts of terrorism,physical or cyber attacks, and other catastrophic events; and
federal, state, and foreign energy and environmental regulation and legislation.
Certain of theseThese factors could increase the expenses and/or reduce the revenues of the traditional electric operating companies, Southern Power, or Southern Company Gas and Southern Company.registrants. For the traditional electric operating companies and Southern Company Gas' regulated gas distribution operations, such increasesimpacts may not be fully recoverable through rates. Other of these factors could reduce the revenues of the traditional electric operating companies, Southern Power, or Southern Company Gas and Southern Company.
Historically, the traditional electric operating companies and Southern Company Gas from time to time have experienced underrecovered fuel and/or purchased gas cost balances and may experience such balances in the future. While the traditional electric operating companies and Southern Company Gas are generally authorized to recover fuel and/or purchased gas costs through cost recovery clauses, recovery may be denied if costs are deemed to be imprudently incurred, and delays in the authorization of such recovery, both of which could negatively impact the cash flows of the affected traditional electric operating company or Southern Company Gas and of Southern Company.
The registrants are subject to risks associated with a changing economic environment, customer behaviors, including increased energy conservation, and adoption patterns of technologies by the customers of the traditional electric operating companies, Southern Power, and Southern Company Gas.Subsidiary Registrants.
The consumption and use of energy are fundamentally linked to economic activity. This relationship is affected over time by changes in the economy, customer behaviors, and technologies. Any economic downturn could negatively impact customer growth and usage per customer, thus reducing the sales of energy and revenues. Additionally, any economic downturn or disruption of financial markets, both nationally and internationally, could negatively affect the financial stability of customers and counterparties of the traditional electric operating companies, Southern Power, and Southern Company Gas.Subsidiary Registrants.
Outside of economic disruptions, changes in customer behaviors in response to energy efficiency programs, changing conditions and preferences, or changes in the adoption of technologies could affect the relationship of economic activity to the consumption of energy.
Both federal and state programs exist to influence how customers use energy, and several of the traditional electric operating companies and Southern Company Gas have PSC or other applicable state regulatory agency mandates to promote energy efficiency. Conservation programs could impact the financial results of the registrants in different ways. For example, if any traditional electric operating company or Southern Company Gas is required to invest in conservation measures that result in

I-32

Table of ContentsIndex to Financial Statements

reduced sales from effective conservation, regulatory lag in adjusting rates for the impact of these measures could have a negative financial impact on such traditional electric operating company or Southern Company Gas and Southern Company. Customers could also voluntarily reduce their consumption of energy in response to decreases in their disposable income, increases in energy prices, or individual conservation efforts.
In addition, the adoption of technology by customers can have both positive and negative impacts on sales. Many new technologies utilize less energy than in the past. However, new electric and natural gas technologies such as electric and natural gas vehicles can create additional demand. The Southern Company system uses best available methods and experience to incorporate the effects of changes in customer behavior, state and federal programs, PSC or other applicable state regulatory agency mandates, and technology, but the Southern Company system's planning processes may not appropriately estimate and incorporate these effects.
All of the factors discussed above could adversely affect Southern Company's, the traditional electric operating companies', Southern Power's, and/or Southern Company Gas'a registrant's results of operations, financial condition, and liquidity.
The operating results of the registrants are affected by weather conditions and may fluctuate on a seasonal and quarterly basis. In addition, catastrophic events, such as fires, earthquakes, hurricanes, tornadoes, floods, droughts, and storms, could result in substantial damage to or limit the operation of the properties of the traditional electric operating companies, Southern Power, and/or Southern Company Gasa Subsidiary Registrant and could negatively impact results of operation, financial condition, and liquidity.
Electric power and natural gas supply are generally seasonal businesses. In many parts of the country, demand for power peaks during the summer months, with market prices also peaking at that time. In other areas, power demand peaks during the winter months. In mostWhile the electric power sales of the areassome of the traditional electric operating companies serve,peak in the summer, others peak in the winter. In the aggregate, electric power sales peak during the summer with a smaller peak during the winter, whilewinter. Additionally, Southern Power has variability in its revenues from renewable generation facilities due to seasonal weather patterns primarily from wind and sun. In most of the areas Southern Company Gas serves, natural gas demand peaks during the winter. As a result, the overall operating results of the registrants may fluctuate substantially on a seasonal basis. In addition, the traditional electric operating companies, Southern Power, and Southern Company GasSubsidiary Registrants have historically sold less

I-31

Table of ContentsIndex to Financial Statements

power and natural gas when weather conditions are milder. Unusually mild weather in the future could reduce the revenues, net income, and available cash of the affected registrant.
Further, volatile or significant weather events could result in substantial damage to the transmission and distribution lines of the traditional electric operating companies, the generating facilities of the traditional electric operating companies and Southern Power, and the natural gas distribution and storage facilities of Southern Company Gas. The traditional electric operating companies, Southern Power, and Southern Company GasSubsidiary Registrants have significant investments in the Atlantic and Gulf Coast regions and Southern Power has wind and natural gasSouthern Company Gas have investments in various states which could be subject to severe weather as well as solar investments in various states which could be subject toand natural disasters.disasters, including wildfires. Further, severe drought conditions can reduce the availability of water and restrict or prevent the operation of certain generating facilities. There have been multiple significant hurricanes in the Southern Company system service territory in recent years.
In the event a traditional electric operating company or Southern Company Gas experiences any of these weather events or any natural disaster or other catastrophic event, recovery of costs in excess of reserves and insurance coverage is subject to the approval of its state PSC or other applicable state regulatory agency. Historically, the traditional electric operating companies from time to time have experienced deficits in their storm cost recovery reserve balances and may experience such deficits in the future. For example, at December 31, 2018, Georgia Power had a substantial underrecovered balance in its storm cost recovery balance as a result of multiple recent significant hurricanes in its service territory. Any denial by the applicable state PSC or other applicable state regulatory agency or delay in recovery of any portion of such costs could have a material negative impact on a traditional electric operating company's or Southern Company Gas' and on Southern Company's results of operations, financial condition, and liquidity.
In addition, damages resulting from significant weather events within the service territory of any traditional electric operating company or Southern Company Gas or affecting Southern Power's customers may result in the loss of customers and reduced demand for energy for extended periods.periods and may impact customers' ability to perform under existing PPAs. See Note 1 to the financial statements under "RevenuesConcentration of Revenue" in Item 8 herein for additional information on Pacific Gas & Electric Company's bankruptcy filing. Any significant loss of customers or reduction in demand for energy could have a material negative impact on a traditional electric operating company's, Southern Power's, or Southern Company Gas' and Southern Company'sregistrant's results of operations, financial condition, and liquidity.
Acquisitions, dispositions, or other strategic ventures or investments may not result in anticipated benefits and may present risks not originally contemplated, which may have a material adverse effect on the liquidity, results of operations, and financial condition of Southern Company and its subsidiaries.
Southern Company and its subsidiaries have made significant acquisitions and investments in the past, as well as recent dispositions, and may in the future make additional acquisitions, dispositions, or other strategic ventures or investments, including the proposed sale by Pivotal Utility Holdings, a wholly-owned subsidiary of Southern Company Gas, of the assets of its natural gas distribution utilities, Elizabethtown Gas and Elkton Gas, and the potential salepending disposition by Southern Power of a 33% equity interest in a newly-formed holding company that owns substantially all ofPlant Mankato, which cannot be assured to be completed or beneficial to Southern Power's solar assets.Company or its subsidiaries. Southern Company and its subsidiaries continually seek opportunities to create value

I-33

Table of ContentsIndex to Financial Statements

through various transactions, including acquisitions or sales of assets. Specifically, Southern Power continually seeks opportunities to execute its strategy to create value through various transactions, including acquisitions, dispositions, and sales of assets,partnership interests, development and construction of new generating facilities, and entry into PPAs primarily with investor-owned utilities, independent power producers,IPPs, municipalities, and other load-serving entities, as well as commercial and industrial customers.
Southern Company and its subsidiaries may face significant competition for transactional opportunities and anticipated transactions may not be completed on acceptable terms or at all. In addition, these transactions are intended to, but may not, result in the generation of cash or income, the realization of savings, the creation of efficiencies, or the reduction of risk. These transactions may also affect the liquidity, results of operations, and financial condition of Southern Company and its subsidiaries.
These transactions also involve risks, including:
they may not result in an increase in income or provide an adequate or expected funds or return on capital or other anticipated benefits;
they may result in Southern Company or its subsidiaries entering into new or additional lines of business, which may have new or different business or operational risks;
they may not be successfully integrated into the acquiring company's operations and/or internal control processes;
the due diligence conducted prior to a transaction may not uncover situations that could result in financial or legal exposure or the acquiring company may not appropriately evaluate the likelihood or quantify the exposure from identified risks;
they may result in decreased earnings, revenues, or cash flow;
Southern Company, Southern Company Gas, and certain of their subsidiaries have retained obligations in connection with transitional agreements related to dispositions that subject these companies to additional risk;
Southern Company or the applicable subsidiary may not be able to achieve the expected financial benefits from the use of funds generated by any dispositions;
expected benefits of a transaction may be dependent on the cooperation or performance of a counterparty; or
for the traditional electric operating companies and Southern Company Gas, costs associated with such investments that were expected to be recovered through regulated rates may not be recoverable.

I-32

Table of ContentsIndex to Financial Statements

Southern Company and Southern Company Gas are holding companies and areSouthern Power owns many of its assets indirectly through subsidiaries. Each of these companies is dependent on cash flows from their respective subsidiaries to meet their ongoing and future financial obligations, including making interest and principal payments on outstanding indebtedness and, for Southern Company, to pay dividends on its common stock.
Southern Company and Southern Company Gas are holding companies and, as such, they have no operations of their own. Substantially all of Southern Company's and Southern Company Gas' and many of Southern Power's respective consolidated assets are held by subsidiaries. A significant portion of Southern Company Gas' debt is issued by its 100%-owned subsidiary, Southern Company Gas Capital, and is fully and unconditionally guaranteed by Southern Company Gas. Southern Company's, and Southern Company Gas' and, to a certain extent, Southern Power's ability to meet their respective financial obligations, including making interest and principal payments on outstanding indebtedness, and, for Southern Company, to pay dividends on its common stock, is primarily dependent on the net income and cash flows of their respective subsidiaries and the ability of those subsidiaries to pay upstream dividends or to repay borrowed funds. Prior to funding Southern Company, or Southern Company Gas, or Southern Power, the respective subsidiaries have financial obligations and, with respect to Southern Company and Southern Company Gas, regulatory restrictions and financial obligations that must be satisfied, including among others, debt service and preferred stock dividends. These subsidiaries are separate legal entities and, except as described below, have no obligation to provide Southern Company, or Southern Company Gas, or Southern Power with funds. Certain of Southern Power's assets are held through controlling interests in subsidiaries. In certain cases, distributions without partner consent are limited to available cash, and the subsidiaries are obligated to distribute all available cash to their owners each quarter. In addition, Southern Company, and Southern Company Gas, and Southern Power may provide capital contributions or debt financing to subsidiaries under certain circumstances, which would reduce the funds available to meet their respective financial obligations, including making interest and principal payments on outstanding indebtedness, and to pay dividends on Southern Company's common stock.
A downgrade in the credit ratings of any of the registrants, Southern Company Gas Capital, or Nicor Gas could negatively affect their ability to access capital at reasonable costs and/or could require posting of collateral or replacing certain indebtedness.
There are a number of factors that rating agencies evaluate to arrive at credit ratings for the registrants, Southern Company Gas Capital, and Nicor Gas, including capital structure, regulatory environment, the ability to cover liquidity requirements, and other commitments for capital. The registrants, Southern Company Gas Capital, and Nicor Gas could experience a downgrade in their ratings if any rating agency concludes that the level of business or financial risk of the industry or the applicable company has deteriorated. Changes in ratings methodologies by the agencies could also have a negative impact on credit ratings. If one or more rating agencies downgrade any registrant, Southern Company Gas Capital, or Nicor Gas, borrowing

I-34

Table of ContentsIndex to Financial Statements

costs likely would increase, including automatic increases in interest rates under applicable term loans and credit facilities, the pool of investors and funding sources would likely decrease, and, particularly for any downgrade to below investment grade, significant collateral requirements may be triggered in a number of contracts. Any credit rating downgrades could require altering the mix of debt financing currently used, and could require the issuance of secured indebtedness and/or indebtedness with additional restrictive covenants binding the applicable company.
Uncertainty in demand for energy can result in lower earnings or higher costs. If demand for energy falls short of expectations, it could result in potentially stranded assets. If demand for energy exceeds expectations, it could result in increased costs for purchasing capacity in the open market or building additional electric generation and transmission facilities or natural gas distribution and storage facilities.
Southern Company, the traditional electric operating companies, and Southern Power each engage in a long-term planning process to estimate the optimal mix and timing of new generation assets required to serve future load obligations. Southern Company Gas engages in a long-term planning process to estimate the optimal mix and timing of building new pipelines and storage facilities, replacing existing pipelines, rewatering storage facilities, and entering new markets and/or expanding in existing markets. These planning processes must look many years into the future in order to accommodate the long lead times associated with the permitting and construction of new generation and associated transmission facilities and natural gas distribution and storage facilities. Inherent risk exists in predicting demand this far into the future as these future loads are dependent on many uncertain factors, including economic conditions, customer usage patterns, efficiency programs, and customer technology adoption. Because regulators may not permit the traditional electric operating companies or Southern Company Gas' regulated operating companies to adjust rates to recover the costs of new generation and associated transmission assets and/or new pipelines and related infrastructure in a timely manner or at all, Southern Company and its subsidiaries may not be able to fully recover these costs or may have exposure to regulatory lag associated with the time between the incurrence of costs and the recovery in customers' rates. In addition, under Southern Power's model of selling capacity and energy at negotiated market-based rates under long-term PPAs, Southern Power might not be able to fully execute its business plan if market prices drop below original forecasts. Southern Power and/or the traditional electric operating companies may not be able to extend existing PPAs or find new buyers for existing generation assets as existing PPAs expire, or they may be forced to market these assets at prices lower than originally intended. These situations could have negative impacts on net income and cash flows for the affected registrant.
The traditional electric operating companies are currently obligated to supply power to retail customers and wholesale customers under long-term PPAs. Southern Power is currently obligated to supply power to wholesale customers under long-

I-33

Table of ContentsIndex to Financial Statements

termlong-term PPAs. At peak times, the demand for power required to meet this obligation could exceed the Southern Company system's available generation capacity. Market or competitive forces may require that the traditional electric operating companies purchase capacity on the open market or build additional generation and transmission facilities and forthat Southern Power to purchase energy or capacity on the open market. Because regulators may not permit the traditional electric operating companies to pass all of these purchase or construction costs on to their customers, the traditional electric operating companies may not be able to recover some or all of these costs or may have exposure to regulatory lag associated with the time between the incurrence of costs of purchased or constructed capacity and the traditional electric operating companies' recovery in customers' rates. Under Southern Power's long-term fixed price PPAs, Southern Power may not be able to recover all of these costs. These situations could have negative impacts on net income and cash flows for the affected registrant.
The businesses of the registrants, SEGCO, and Nicor Gas are dependent on their ability to successfully access funds through capital markets and financial institutions. The inability of any of the registrants, SEGCO, or Nicor Gas to access funds may limit its ability to execute its business plan by impacting its ability to fund capital investments or acquisitions that it may otherwise rely on to achieve future earnings and cash flows.
The registrants, SEGCO, and Nicor Gas rely on access to both short-term money markets and longer-term capital markets as a significant source of liquidity for capital requirements not satisfied by the cash flow from their respective operations. If any of the registrants, SEGCO, or Nicor Gas is not able to access capital at competitive rates or on favorable terms, its ability to implement its business plan will be limited by impacting its ability to fund capital investments or acquisitions that it may otherwise rely on to achieve future earnings and cash flows. In addition, the registrants, SEGCO, and Nicor Gas rely on committed bank lending agreements as back-up liquidity which allows them to access low cost money markets. Each of the registrants, SEGCO, and Nicor Gas believes that it will maintain sufficient access to these financial markets based upon current credit ratings. However, certain events or market disruptions may increase the cost of borrowing or adversely affect the ability to raise capital through the issuance of securities or other borrowing arrangements or the ability to secure committed bank lending agreements used as back-up sources of capital. Such disruptions could include:
an economic downturn or uncertainty;
bankruptcy or financial distress at an unrelated energy company, financial institution, or sovereign entity;
capital markets volatility and disruption, either nationally or internationally;
changes in tax policy;policy, including further interpretation and guidance on tax reform;

I-35

Table of ContentsIndex to Financial Statements

volatility in market prices for electricity and natural gas;
terrorist attacksactual or threatened cyber or physical attacks on the Southern Company system's facilities or unrelated energy companies' facilities;
war or threat of war; or
the overall health of the utility and financial institution industries.
As of December 31, 2017, Mississippi Power's current liabilities exceeded current assets by approximately $911 million primarily due to a $900 million unsecured term loan that matures on March 31, 2018. Mississippi Power expects to refinance the unsecured term loan with external security issuances and/or borrowings from financial institutions or Southern Company. Mississippi Power has been informed by Southern Company that in the event sufficient funds are not available from external sources, Southern Company intends to provide Mississippi Power with loans and/or equity to fund the remaining indebtedness to mature and other cash needs over the next 12 months.
Georgia Power's ability to make future borrowings through its term loan credit facility with the Federal Financing BankFFB is subject to the satisfaction of customary conditions, as well as certification of compliance with the requirements of the loan guarantee program under Title XVII of the Energy Policy Act of 2005, including accuracy of project-related representations and warranties, delivery of updated project-related information and evidence of compliance with the prevailing wage requirements of the Davis-Bacon Act of 1931, as amended, and certification from the DOE's consulting engineer that proceeds of the advances are used to reimburse certain costs of construction relating to Plant Vogtle Units 3 and 4 that are eligible for financing under the Title XVII Loan Guarantee Program. Prior to obtaining any further advances under Georgia Power's loan guarantee agreement with the DOE, Georgia Power is required to obtain the DOE's approval of the Bechtel Agreement.
Failure to comply with debt covenants or conditions could adversely affect the ability of the registrants, SEGCO, Southern Company Gas Capital, or Nicor Gas to execute future borrowings.
The debt and credit agreements of the registrants, SEGCO, Southern Company Gas Capital, and Nicor Gas contain various financial and other covenants. Georgia Power's loan guarantee agreement with the DOE contains additional covenants, events of default, and mandatory prepayment events relating to the construction of Plant Vogtle Units 3 and 4. Failure to meet those covenants beyond applicable grace periods could result in accelerated due dates and/or termination of the agreements, which would negatively affect the applicable company's financial condition and liquidity.

I-34

Table of ContentsIndex to Financial Statements

Volatility in the securities markets, interest rates, and other factors could substantially increase defined benefit pension and other postretirement plan costs and the costs offunding available for nuclear decommissioning.
The costs of providing pension and other postretirement benefit plans are dependent on a number of factors, such as the rates of return on plan assets, discount rates, the level of interest rates used to measure the required minimum funding levels of the plan, changes in actuarial assumptions, future government regulation, changes inregulations, and/or life expectancy, and the frequency and amount of the Southern Company system's required or voluntary contributions made to the plans. Changes in actuarial assumptions and differences between the assumptions and actual values, as well as a significant decline in the value of investments that fund the pension and other postretirement plans, if not offset or mitigated by a decline in plan liabilities, could increase pension and other postretirement expense, and the Southern Company system could be required from time to time to fund the pension plans with significant amounts of cash. Such cash funding obligations could have a material impact on liquidity by reducing cash flows and could negatively affect results of operations. Additionally, Alabama Power and Georgia Power each hold significant assets in their nuclear decommissioning trusts to satisfy obligations to decommission Alabama Power's and Georgia Power's nuclear plants. The rate of return on assets held in those trusts can significantly impact both the costs offunding available for decommissioning and the funding requirements for the trusts.
The registrants are subject to risks associated with their ability to obtain adequate insurance at acceptable costs.
The financial condition of some insurance companies, the threat of terrorism,actual or threatened physical or cyber attacks, and natural disasters, among other things, could have disruptive effects on insurance markets. The availability of insurance covering risks that the registrants and their respective competitors typically insure against may decrease, and the insurance that the registrants are able to obtain may have higher deductibles, higher premiums, and more restrictive policy terms. Further, the insurance policies may not cover all of the potential exposures or the actual amount of loss incurred.
Any losses not covered by insurance, or any increases in the cost of applicable insurance, could adversely affect the results of operations, cash flows, or financial condition of the affected registrant.
The use of derivative contracts by Southern Company and its subsidiaries in the normal course of business could result in financial losses that negatively impact the net income of the registrants or in reported net income volatility.
Southern Company and its subsidiaries including the traditional electric operating companies, Southern Power, and Southern Company Gas, use derivative instruments, such as swaps, options, futures, and forwards, to manage their commodity and interest rate exposures and, to a lesser extent, manage foreign currency exchange rate exposure and engage in limited trading activities. The registrants could recognize financial losses as a result of volatility in the market values of these contracts or if a counterparty fails to perform. These risks are managed through risk management policies, limits, and procedures, which might not work as planned and cannot entirely eliminate the risks associated with these activities. In addition, derivative contracts entered into for hedging purposes might not offset the underlying exposure being hedged as expected, resulting in financial losses. In the absence of actively quoted market prices and pricing information from external sources, the valuation of these financial instruments can involve management's judgment or use of estimates. The factors used in the valuation of these instruments become more difficult to predict and the calculations become less reliable the further into the future these estimates are made.

I-36

Table of ContentsIndex to Financial Statements

future. As a result, changes in the underlying assumptions or use of alternative valuation methods could affect the reported fair value of these contracts.
In addition, Southern Company Gas utilizes derivative instruments to lock in economic value in wholesale gas services, which may not qualify as, or aremay not be designated as, hedges for accounting purposes. The difference in accounting treatment for the underlying position and the financial instrument used to hedge the value of the contract can cause volatility in reported net income of Southern Company and Southern Company Gas while the positions are open due to mark-to-market accounting.
Future impairments of goodwill or long-lived assets could have a material adverse effect on the registrants' results of operations.
Goodwill is assessed for impairment at least annually and more frequently if events or circumstances occur that would more likely than not reduce the fair value of a reporting unit below its carrying value and long-lived assets are assessed for impairment whenever events or circumstances indicate that an asset's carrying amount may not be recoverable. In connection with the completion of the Merger, the application of the acquisition method of accounting was pushed down to Southern Company Gas. The excess of the purchase price over the fair values of Southern Company Gas' assets and liabilities was recorded as goodwill. This resulted in a significant increase in the goodwill recorded on Southern Company's and Southern Company Gas' consolidated balance sheets. At December 31, 2017,2018, goodwill was $6.3$5.3 billion and $6.0$5.0 billion for Southern Company and Southern Company Gas, respectively.
In addition, Southern Company and its subsidiaries have long-lived assets recorded on their balance sheets. To the extent the value of goodwill or long-lived assets become impaired, the affected registrant may be required to incur impairment charges that could have a material impact on their results of operations. For example, a wholly-owned subsidiary of Southern Company

I-35

Table of ContentsIndex to Financial Statements

Gas owns and operates a natural gas storage facility consisting of two salt dome caverns where recent seismic mapping indicates that proximity of one of the caverns to the edge of the salt dome may be less than the required minimum and could result in Southern Company Gas retiring the cavern early. Early retirement of the cavern could trigger impairment of other long-lived assets associated with the natural gas storage facility. In addition, a subsidiary of Southern Company has several leveraged lease agreements, with terms ranging up to 45 years, which relate to international and domestic energy generation, distribution, and transportation assets. Southern Company receives federal income tax deductions for depreciation and amortization, as well as interest on long-term debt related to these investments. Southern Company reviews all important lease assumptions at least annually, or more frequently if events or changes in circumstances indicate that a change in assumptions has occurred or may occur. With respect to Southern Company's subsidiary's investments in leveraged leases, the recovery of its investment is dependent on the profitable operation of the leased assets by the respective lessees. A significant deterioration in the performance of the leased asset could result in the impairment of the related lease receivable.

I-36

Table of ContentsIndex to Financial Statements

Item 1B.UNRESOLVED STAFF COMMENTS.
None.

I-37

    Table of Contents                                Index to Financial Statements

Item 2. PROPERTIES
Electric
Electric Properties
The traditional electric operating companies, Southern Power, and SEGCO, at December 31, 2017,January 1, 2019, owned and/or operated 33 hydroelectric generating stations, 2926 fossil fuel generating stations, three nuclear generating stations, 1513 combined cycle/cogeneration stations, 3540 solar facilities, eightnine wind facilities, one biomass facility, and one landfill gasbiomass facility. The amounts of capacity for each company, as of December 31, 2017,at January 1, 2019, are shown in the table below.
Generating StationLocation
Nameplate
Capacity (1)

 Location
Nameplate
Capacity (1)

 
 (KWs)
  (KWs)
 
FOSSIL STEAM    
GadsdenGadsden, AL120,000
 Gadsden, AL120,000
 
GorgasJasper, AL1,021,250
 Jasper, AL1,021,250
(2)
BarryMobile, AL1,300,000
 Mobile, AL1,300,000
 
Greene CountyDemopolis, AL300,000
(2)Demopolis, AL300,000
(3)
Gaston Unit 5Wilsonville, AL880,000
 Wilsonville, AL880,000
 
MillerBirmingham, AL2,532,288
(3)Birmingham, AL2,532,288
(4)
Alabama Power Total 6,153,538
  6,153,538
 
BowenCartersville, GA3,160,000
 Cartersville, GA3,160,000
 
HammondRome, GA800,000
 Rome, GA800,000
(5)
McIntoshEffingham County, GA163,117
 Effingham County, GA163,117
(5)
SchererMacon, GA750,924
(4)Macon, GA750,924
(6)
WansleyCarrollton, GA925,550
(5)Carrollton, GA925,550
(7)
YatesNewnan, GA700,000
 Newnan, GA700,000
 
Georgia Power Total 6,499,591
  6,499,591
 
CristPensacola, FL970,000
 
DanielPascagoula, MS500,000
(6)
Scherer Unit 3Macon, GA204,500
(4)
Gulf Power Total 1,674,500
 
DanielPascagoula, MS500,000
(6)Pascagoula, MS500,000
(8)
Greene CountyDemopolis, AL200,000
(2)Demopolis, AL200,000
(3)
WatsonGulfport, MS862,000
 Gulfport, MS750,000
 
Mississippi Power Total 1,562,000
  1,450,000
 
Gaston Units 1-4Wilsonville, AL Wilsonville, AL 
SEGCO Total 1,000,000
(7) 1,000,000
(9)
Total Fossil Steam 16,889,629
  15,103,129
 
NUCLEAR STEAM    
FarleyDothan, AL Dothan, AL 
Alabama Power Total 1,720,000
  1,720,000
 
HatchBaxley, GA899,612
(8)Baxley, GA899,612
(10)
Vogtle Units 1 and 2Augusta, GA1,060,240
(9)Augusta, GA1,060,240
(11)
Georgia Power Total 1,959,852
  1,959,852
 
Total Nuclear Steam 3,679,852
  3,679,852
 
COMBUSTION TURBINES  
Greene CountyDemopolis, AL 
Alabama Power Total 720,000
 
BoulevardSavannah, GA19,700
 

I-38

    Table of Contents                                Index to Financial Statements

Generating StationLocation
Nameplate
Capacity (1)

 Location
Nameplate
Capacity (1)

 
COMBUSTION TURBINES  
Greene CountyDemopolis, AL 
Alabama Power Total 720,000
 
BoulevardSavannah, GA19,700
 
McDonough Unit 3Atlanta, GA78,800
 Atlanta, GA78,800
 
McIntosh Units 1 through 8Effingham County, GA640,000
 Effingham County, GA640,000
 
McManusBrunswick, GA481,700
 Brunswick, GA481,700
 
RobinsWarner Robins, GA158,400
 Warner Robins, GA158,400
 
WansleyCarrollton, GA26,322
(5)Carrollton, GA26,322
(7)
WilsonAugusta, GA354,100
 Augusta, GA354,100
 
Georgia Power Total 1,759,022
  1,759,022
 
Lansing Smith Unit ASouthport, FL39,400
 
Pea Ridge Units 1 through 3Pea Ridge, FL15,000
 
Gulf Power Total 54,400
 
Chevron Cogenerating StationPascagoula, MS147,292
(10)Pascagoula, MS147,292
(12)
SweattMeridian, MS39,400
 Meridian, MS39,400
 
WatsonGulfport, MS39,360
 Gulfport, MS39,360
 
Mississippi Power Total 226,052
  226,052
 
AddisonThomaston, GA668,800
 Thomaston, GA668,800
 
Cleveland CountyCleveland County, NC720,000
 Cleveland County, NC720,000
 
DahlbergJackson County, GA756,000
 Jackson County, GA756,000
 
OleanderCocoa, FL791,301
 
RowanSalisbury, NC455,250
 Salisbury, NC455,250
 
Southern Power Total 3,391,351
  2,600,050
 
Gaston (SEGCO)
Wilsonville, AL19,680
(7)Wilsonville, AL19,680
(9)
Total Combustion Turbines 6,170,505
  5,324,804
 
COGENERATION    
Washington CountyWashington County, AL123,428
 Washington County, AL123,428
 
Lowndes CountyBurkeville, AL104,800
 Burkeville, AL104,800
 
TheodoreTheodore, AL236,418
 Theodore, AL236,418
 
Alabama Power Total 464,646
  464,646
 
COMBINED CYCLE    
BarryMobile, AL Mobile, AL 
Alabama Power Total 1,070,424
  1,070,424
 
McIntosh Units 10&11Effingham County, GA1,318,920
 
McIntosh Units 10 and 11Effingham County, GA1,318,920
 
McDonough-Atkinson Units 4 through 6Atlanta, GA2,520,000
 Atlanta, GA2,520,000
 
Georgia Power Total 3,838,920
  3,838,920
 
Lansing Smith Unit 3Southport, FL 
Gulf Power Total 545,500
 
DanielPascagoula, MS1,070,424
 
RatcliffeKemper County, MS769,898
(13)
Mississippi Power Total 1,840,322
 
FranklinSmiths, AL1,857,820
 
HarrisAutaugaville, AL1,318,920
 
MankatoMankato, MN375,000
(14)
RowanSalisbury, NC530,550
 
Wansley Units 6 and 7Carrollton, GA1,073,000
 
Southern Power Total 5,155,290
 
Total Combined Cycle 11,904,956
 

I-39

    Table of Contents                                Index to Financial Statements

Generating StationLocation
Nameplate
Capacity (1)

 Location
Nameplate
Capacity (1)

 
DanielPascagoula, MS1,070,424
 
Kemper County/RatcliffeKemper County, MS769,898
(11)
Mississippi Power Total 1,840,322
 
FranklinSmiths, AL1,857,820
 
HarrisAutaugaville, AL1,318,920
 
MankatoMankato, MN375,000
 
RowanSalisbury, NC530,550
 
Stanton Unit AOrlando, FL428,649
(12)
WansleyCarrollton, GA1,073,000
 
Southern Power Total 5,583,939
 
Total Combined Cycle 12,879,105
 
HYDROELECTRIC FACILITIES    
BankheadHolt, AL53,985
 Holt, AL53,985
 
BouldinWetumpka, AL225,000
 Wetumpka, AL225,000
 
HarrisWedowee, AL132,000
 Wedowee, AL132,000
 
HenryOhatchee, AL72,900
 Ohatchee, AL72,900
 
HoltHolt, AL46,944
 Holt, AL46,944
 
JordanWetumpka, AL100,000
 Wetumpka, AL100,000
 
LayClanton, AL177,000
 Clanton, AL177,000
 
Lewis SmithJasper, AL157,500
 Jasper, AL157,500
 
Logan MartinVincent, AL135,000
 Vincent, AL135,000
 
MartinDadeville, AL182,000
 Dadeville, AL182,000
 
MitchellVerbena, AL170,000
 Verbena, AL170,000
 
ThurlowTallassee, AL81,000
 Tallassee, AL81,000
 
WeissLeesburg, AL87,750
 Leesburg, AL87,750
 
YatesTallassee, AL47,000
 Tallassee, AL47,000
 
Alabama Power Total 1,668,079
  1,668,079
 
Bartletts FerryColumbus, GA173,000
 Columbus, GA173,000
 
Goat RockColumbus, GA38,600
 Columbus, GA38,600
 
Lloyd ShoalsJackson, GA14,400
 Jackson, GA14,400
 
Morgan FallsAtlanta, GA16,800
 Atlanta, GA16,800
 
North HighlandsColumbus, GA29,600
 Columbus, GA29,600
 
Oliver DamColumbus, GA60,000
 Columbus, GA60,000
 
Rocky MountainRome, GA215,256
(13)Rome, GA215,256
(15)
Sinclair DamMilledgeville, GA45,000
 Milledgeville, GA45,000
 
Tallulah FallsClayton, GA72,000
 Clayton, GA72,000
 
TerroraClayton, GA16,000
 Clayton, GA16,000
 
TugaloClayton, GA45,000
 Clayton, GA45,000
 
Wallace DamEatonton, GA321,300
 Eatonton, GA321,300
 
YonahToccoa, GA22,500
 Toccoa, GA22,500
 
6 Other PlantsVarious Georgia locations18,080
 Various Georgia locations18,080
 
Georgia Power Total 1,087,536
  1,087,536
 
Total Hydroelectric Facilities 2,755,615
  2,755,615
 

I-40

    Table of Contents                                Index to Financial Statements

Generating StationLocation
Nameplate
Capacity (1)

 Location
Nameplate
Capacity (1)

 
RENEWABLE SOURCES:    
SOLAR FACILITIES    
Fort RuckerCalhoun County, AL10,560
 
Anniston Army DepotDale County, AL7,380
 
Alabama Power Total 17,940
 
Fort BenningColumbus, GA30,000
 Columbus, GA30,005
 
Fort GordonAugusta, GA30,000
 Augusta, GA30,000
 
Fort StewartFort Stewart, GA30,000
 Fort Stewart, GA30,000
 
Kings BayCamden County, GA30,000
 Camden County, GA30,161
 
DaltonDalton, GA6,012
 Dalton, GA6,508
 
3 Other PlantsVarious Georgia locations2,984
 
Marine Corps Logistics BaseAlbany, GA31,161
 
4 Other PlantsVarious Georgia locations5,171
 
Georgia Power Total 128,996
  163,006
 
AdobeKern County, CA20,000
 Kern County, CA20,000
 
ApexNorth Las Vegas, NV20,000
 North Las Vegas, NV20,000
 
Boulder IClark County, NV100,000
(14)Clark County, NV100,000
 
ButlerTaylor County, GA103,700
 Taylor County, GA103,700
 
Butler Solar FarmTaylor County, GA22,000
 Taylor County, GA22,000
 
CalipatriaImperial County, CA20,000
 Imperial County, CA20,000
 
Campo VerdeImperial County, CA147,420
 Imperial County, CA147,420
 
CimarronSpringer, NM30,640
 Springer, NM30,640
 
Decatur CountyDecatur County, GA20,000
 Decatur County, GA20,000
 
Decatur ParkwayDecatur County, GA84,000
 Decatur County, GA84,000
 
Desert StatelineSan Bernadino County, CA299,900
(14)San Bernadino County, CA299,900
 
East PecosPecos County, TX120,000
 Pecos County, TX120,000
 
GarlandKern County, CA205,130
(14)Kern County, CA205,130
 
Gaskell West IKern County, CA20,000
 
GranvilleOxford, NC2,500
 Oxford, NC2,500
 
HenriettaKings County, CA102,000
(14)Kings County, CA102,000
 
Imperial ValleyImperial County, CA163,200
(14)Imperial County, CA163,200
 
LamesaDawson County, TX102,000
 Dawson County, TX102,000
 
Lost Hills - BlackwellKern County, CA33,440
(14)Kern County, CA33,440
 
Macho SpringsLuna County, NM55,000
 Luna County, NM55,000
 
Morelos del SolKern County, CA15,000
 Kern County, CA15,000
 
North StarFresno County, CA61,600
(14)Fresno County, CA61,600
 
PawpawTaylor County, GA30,480
 Taylor County, GA30,480
 
RoserockPecos County, TX160,000
(14)Pecos County, TX160,000
 
RutherfordRutherford County, NC74,800
 Rutherford County, NC74,800
 
SandhillsTaylor County, GA146,890
 Taylor County, GA146,890
 
SpectrumClark County, NV30,240
 Clark County, NV30,240
 
TranquillityFresno County, CA205,300
(14)Fresno County, CA205,300
 
Southern Power Total 2,375,240
(15) 2,395,240
(16)
Total Solar 2,504,236
  2,576,186
 

I-41

    Table of Contents                                Index to Financial Statements

Generating StationLocation
Nameplate
Capacity (1)

 Location
Nameplate
Capacity (1)

 
WIND FACILITIES    
BethelCastro County, TX276,000
 Castro County, TX276,000
 
Cactus FlatsConcho County, TX148,350
 
Grant PlainsGrant County, OK147,200
 Grant County, OK147,200
 
Grant WindGrant County, OK151,800
 Grant County, OK151,800
 
Kay WindKay County, OK299,000
 Kay County, OK299,000
 
PassadumkeagPenobscot County, ME42,900
 Penobscot County, ME42,900
 
Salt ForkDonley & Gray Counties TX174,000
 Donley & Gray Counties TX174,000
 
Tyler BluffCooke County, TX125,580
 Cooke County, TX125,580
 
Wake WindCrosby & Floyd Counties, TX257,250
(14)Crosby & Floyd Counties, TX257,250
 
Southern Power Total 1,473,730
  1,622,080
(17)
LANDFILL GAS FACILITY  
PerdidoEscambia County, FL 
Gulf Power Total 3,200
 
BIOMASS FACILITY    
NacogdochesSacul, TX Sacul, TX 
Southern Power Total 115,500
  115,500
 
   
Total Alabama Power Generating Capacity 11,814,627
 
Total Georgia Power Generating Capacity 15,307,927
 
Total Mississippi Power Generating Capacity 3,516,374
 
Total Southern Power Generating Capacity 11,888,160
 
Total Generating Capacity 46,936,018
  43,546,768
 
Notes:
(1)See "Jointly-Owned Facilities" herein and Note 5 to the financial statements under "Joint Ownership Agreements" in Item 8 herein for additional information.
(2)As part of its environmental compliance strategy, Alabama Power plans to retire Plant Gorgas Units 8, 9, and 10 by April 15, 2019. See Note 2 to the financial statements under "Alabama Power – Environmental Accounting Order" in Item 8 herein for additional information.
(3)Owned by Alabama Power and Mississippi Power as tenants in common in the proportions of 60% and 40%, respectively. Capacity shown for each company represents its portion of total plant capacity.
(3)(4)Capacity shown is Alabama Power's portion (95.92%) of total plant capacity.
(4)(5)Georgia Power has requested to decertify and retire Plant Hammond Units 1 through 4 and Plant McIntosh Unit 1 upon approval of its 2019 IRP filing. See Note 2 to the financial statements under "Georgia Power – Integrated Resource Plan" in Item 8 herein for additional information.
(6)Capacity shown for Georgia Power is 8.4% of Units 1 and 2 and 75% of Unit 3. Capacity shown for Gulf Power is 25% of Unit 3.
(5)(7)Capacity shown is Georgia Power's portion (53.5%) of total plant capacity.
(6)(8)Represents 50%Capacity shown is Mississippi Power's portion (50%) of Plant Daniel Units 1 and 2, which are owned as tenants in common by Gulf Power and Mississippi Power.total plant capacity.
(7)(9)SEGCO is jointly-owned by Alabama Power and Georgia Power. See BUSINESS in Item 1 herein for additional information. Also see Note 7 to the financial statements under "SEGCO" in Item 8 herein.
(8)(10)Capacity shown is Georgia Power's portion (50.1%) of total plant capacity.
(9)(11)Capacity shown is Georgia Power's portion (45.7%) of total plant capacity.
(10)(12)Generation is dedicated to a single industrial customer. See MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS – FINANCIAL CONDITION AND LIQUIDITY – "Credit Rating Risk" of Mississippi Power in Item 7 herein.
(11)(13)The capacity shown is the gross capacity using natural gas fuel without supplemental firing.
(12)(14)Capacity shown isOn November 5, 2018, Southern Power's portion (65%)Power entered into an agreement with Northern States Power to sell all of total plant capacity.its equity interests in Plant Mankato (including the 385-MW expansion currently under construction). The ultimate outcome of this matter cannot be determined at this time. See Note 15 to the financial statements under "Southern Power – Sales of Natural Gas Plants" in Item 8 herein for additional information.
(13)(15)Capacity shown is Georgia Power's portion (25.4%) of total plant capacity. OPC operates the plant.
(14)(16)Each facility is owned byIn May 2018, Southern Power throughsold a majority-owned subsidiary (90.1% Wake Wind, 66% Desert Stateline,noncontrolling 33% equity interest in SP Solar (a limited partnership indirectly owning all of Southern Power's solar facilities, except the Roserock and Gaskell West facilities). SP Solar is the 51% for eachmajority owner of the following facilities: Boulder 1, Garland, Henrietta, Imperial Valley, Lost Hills-Blackwell,Hills Blackwell, North Star, and Tranquillity; the 66% majority owner of Desert Stateline; and the sole owner of the remaining SP Solar facilities. Southern Power is the 51% majority owner of Roserock and Tranquillity). Thealso the controlling partner in a tax equity partnership owning Gaskell West. All of these entities are consolidated subsidiaries of Southern Power and the capacity shown in the table is 100% of the nameplate capacity for the respective facility.
(15)(17)In December 2018, Southern Power is pursuing the sale ofsold a 33%noncontrolling tax equity interest in a newly-formed holding company thatSP Wind (which owns substantially all of Southern Power's solar assets, which, if successful,wind facilities, except Cactus Flats). SP Wind is expected to closethe 90.1% majority owner of Wake Wind and owns 100% of the remaining SP Wind facilities. Southern Power is the controlling partner in a tax equity partnership owning Cactus Flats. All of these entities are consolidated subsidiaries of Southern Power and the capacity shown in the middletable is 100% of 2018.the nameplate capacity for the respective facility.

I-42

Table of ContentsIndex to Financial Statements

Except as discussed below under "Titles to Property," the principal plants and other important units of the traditional electric operating companies, Southern Power, and SEGCO are owned in fee by the respective companies. It is the opinion of management of each such company that its operating properties are adequately maintained and are substantially in good operating condition, and suitable for their intended purpose.
Mississippi Power owns a 79-mile length of 500-kilovolt transmission line which is leased to Entergy Gulf States Louisiana, LLC. The line completed in 1984, extends from Plant Daniel to the Louisiana state line. Entergy Gulf States Louisiana, LLC is

I-42

Table of ContentsIndex to Financial Statements

paying a use fee over a 40-year period through 2024 covering all expenses and the amortization of the original $57 million cost of the line.cost. At December 31, 2017,2018, the unamortized portion of this cost was approximately $13$12 million.
Mississippi Power owns a lignite mine and equipment that were intended to provide fuel for the Kemper IGCC. Mississippi Power also has acquired mineral reserves located around the Kemper County energy facility. The mine, operated by North American Coal Corporation, started commercial operation in 2013. Liberty Fuels Company, LLC, the operator of the mine, has a legal obligation to perform mine reclamation and Mississippi Power has a contractual obligation to fund all reclamation activities. As a result of the abandonment of the Kemper IGCC, final mine reclamation began in 2018 and is expected to be substantially completed in 2020, with monitoring expected to continue through 2027. Mississippi Power expects mine reclamation activitiesis currently evaluating its options regarding the final disposition of the CO2 pipeline, including removal of the pipeline. This evaluation is expected to beginbe complete later in 2018.2019. The ultimate outcome of these matters cannot be determined at this time. See MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSISNote 2 to the financial statements under "Mississippi PowerFUTURE EARNINGS POTENTIAL – "KemperKemper County Energy Facility – Lignite Mine and CO2 Pipeline Facilities" of Mississippi Power in Item 7 herein and Note 3 to the financial statements of Southern Company and Mississippi Power under "Kemper County Energy Facility – Lignite Mine and COFacilities2 Pipeline Facilities"" in Item 8 herein for additional information on the lignite mine.mine and CO2 pipeline.
In August 2018, Mississippi Power will filefiled a reserve margin planRMP which identified alternatives that, if implemented, could impact Mississippi Power's generating stations as well as the generating stationsPlant Greene County, jointly owned by Mississippi Power and other traditional electric operating companies.Alabama Power. See BUSINESS in Item 1 herein under "Rate Matters – Integrated Resource Planning – Mississippi Power" for additional information.
In 2017,conjunction with Southern Company's sale of Gulf Power, Mississippi Power and Gulf Power have committed to seek a restructuring of their 50% undivided ownership interests in Plant Daniel such that each of them would, after the restructuring, own 100% of a generating unit. On January 15, 2019, Gulf Power provided notice to Mississippi Power that Gulf Power will retire its share of the generating capacity of Plant Daniel on January 15, 2024. Mississippi Power has the option to purchase Gulf Power's ownership interest for $1 on January 15, 2024, provided that Mississippi Power exercises the option no later than 120 days prior to that date. Mississippi Power is assessing the potential operational and economic effects of Gulf Power's notice. The ultimate outcome of these matters remains subject to completion of Mississippi Power's evaluations and applicable regulatory approvals, including the FERC and the Mississippi PSC, and cannot now be determined. See Note 15 to the financial statements under "Southern Company's Sale of Gulf Power" in Item 8 herein for information regarding the sale of Gulf Power.
In 2018, the maximum demand on the traditional electric operating companies, Southern Power Company, and SEGCO was 34,874,00036,429,000 KWs and occurred on August 17, 2017.January 18, 2018. The all-time maximum demand of 38,777,000 KWs on the traditional electric operating companies, Southern Power Company, and SEGCO occurred on August 22, 2007. These amounts exclude demand served by capacity retained by MEAG Power, OPC, and SEPA. The reserve margin for the traditional electric operating companies, Southern Power Company, and SEGCO in 20172018 was 30.8%29.8%. See SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA in Item 6 herein for additional information.
Jointly-Owned Facilities
Alabama Power, Georgia Power, and SouthernMississippi Power at December 31, 2017January 1, 2019 had undivided interests in certain generating plants and other related facilities with non-affiliated parties. The percentages of ownership of the total plant or facility are as follows:
    Percentage Ownership
  
Total
Capacity
 
Alabama
Power
 
Power
South
 
Georgia
Power
 OPC 
MEAG
Power
 Dalton  
Southern
Power
 OUC FMPA KUA
  (MWs)                     
Plant Miller
Units 1 and 2
 1,320
 91.8% 8.2% % % % %  % % % %
Plant Hatch 1,796
 
 
 50.1
 30.0
 17.7
 2.2
  
 
 
 
Plant Vogtle
Units 1 and 2
 2,320
 
 
 45.7
 30.0
 22.7
 1.6
  
 
 
 
Plant Scherer
Units 1 and 2
 1,636
 
 
 8.4
 60.0
 30.2
 1.4
  
 
 
 
Plant Wansley 1,779
 
 
 53.5
 30.0
 15.1
 1.4
  
 
 
 
Rocky Mountain 848
 
 
 25.4
 74.6
 
 
  
 
 
 
Plant Stanton A 660
 
 
 
 
 
 
  65.0
 28.0
 3.5
 3.5
    Percentage Ownership  
  
Total
Capacity
 
Alabama
Power
 
Power
South
 
Georgia
Power
 
Mississippi
Power
 OPC 
MEAG
Power
 Dalton 
Gulf
Power
  (MWs)                
Plant Miller Units 1 and 2 1,320
 91.8% 8.2% % % % % % %
Plant Hatch 1,796
 
 
 50.1
 
 30.0
 17.7
 2.2
 
Plant Vogtle Units 1 and 2 2,320
 
 
 45.7
 
 30.0
 22.7
 1.6
 
Plant Scherer Units 1 and 2 1,636
 
 
 8.4
 
 60.0
 30.2
 1.4
 
Plant Scherer Unit 3 818
 
 
 75.0
 
 
 
 
 25.0
Plant Wansley 1,779
 
 
 53.5
 
 30.0
 15.1
 1.4
 
Rocky Mountain 903
 
 
 25.4
 
 74.6
 
 
 
Plant Daniel Units 1 and 2 1,000
 
 
 
 50.0
 
 
 
 50.0

I-43

Table of ContentsIndex to Financial Statements

Alabama Power, Georgia Power, and GeorgiaMississippi Power have contracted to operate and maintain the respective units in which each has an interest (other than Rocky Mountain) as agent for the joint owners. SCS provides operation and maintenance services for Plant Stanton A. Southern Nuclear operates and provides services to Alabama Power's and Georgia Power's nuclear plants.
In addition, Georgia Power has commitments regarding a portion of a 5% interest in Plant Vogtle Units 1 and 2 owned by MEAG Power that are in effect until the later of retirement of the plant or the latest stated maturity date of MEAG Power's bonds issued to finance such ownership interest. The payments for capacity are required whether any capacity is available. The energy cost is a function of each unit's variable operating costs. Except for the portion of the capacity payments related to the Georgia PSC's disallowances of Plant Vogtle Units 1 and 2 costs, the cost of such capacity and energy is included in purchased power from non-affiliates in Georgia Power's statements of income in Item 8 herein. Also see Note 79 to the financial statements of Georgia Power under "Commitments – "Fuel and Purchased Power Agreements"Purchase Agreements" in Item 8 herein for additional information.

I-43

Table of ContentsIndex to Financial Statements

Construction continues on Plant Vogtle Units 3 and 4, which are jointly owned by the Vogtle Owners (with each owner holding the same undivided ownership interest as shown in the table above with respect to Plant Vogtle Units 1 and 2). See Note 32 to the financial statements of Southern Company and under "Georgia Power under "Nuclear Construction" and "Retail Regulatory MattersNuclear Construction" respectively, in Item 8 herein.
On December 4, 2018, Southern Power completed the sale of its 65% ownership interest in Plant Stanton Unit A, which Southern Power previously jointly-owned with OUC, FMPA, and KUA, to NextEra Energy. See Note 15 to the financial statements under "Southern PowerSales of Natural Gas Plants" in Item 8 herein for additional information.
Titles to Property
The traditional electric operating companies', Southern Power's, and SEGCO's interests in the principal plants (other than certain pollution control facilities and the land on which five combustion turbine generators of Mississippi Power are located, which is held by easement) and other important units of the respective companies are owned in fee by such companies, subject only to the following major encumbrances: (1) liens pursuant to pollution control revenue bonds of Gulf Power on specific pollution control facilities at Plant Daniel, (2) liens pursuant to the assumption of debt obligations by Mississippi Power in connection with the acquisition of Plant Daniel Units 3 and 4, (2) a leasehold interest granted by Mississippi Power's largest retail customer, Chevron Products Company (Chevron), at the Chevron refinery, on which five combustion turbines of Mississippi Power are located, (3) liens pursuant to the agreements entered into with Mississippi Power's largest customer, Chevron Products Company (Chevron), onin October 4, 2017 on theMississippi Power's co-generation assets located at the Chevron refinery, (4) liens associated with Georgia Power's reimbursement obligations to the DOE under its loan guarantee, which are secured by a first priority lien on (a) Georgia Power's 45.7% undivided ownership interest in Plant Vogtle Units 3 and 4 and (b) Georgia Power's rights and obligations under the principal contracts relating to Plant Vogtle Units 3 and 4, and (5) liens associated with two PPAs assumed as part of the acquisition of thePlant Mankato project in October 2016 by Southern Power Company. See Note 65 to the financial statements of Southern Company, Georgia Power, Gulf Power, Mississippi Power, and Southern Power under "Assets"Assets Subject to Lien," Note 68 to the financial statements of Southern Companyunder "Secured Debt" and Georgia Power under "DOE"Long-term DebtDOE Loan Guarantee Borrowings," and Note 615 to the financial statements under "Southern PowerSales of Southern Company and Mississippi Power under "Plant Daniel Revenue Bonds"Natural Gas Plants" in Item 8 herein for additional information. The traditional electric operating companies own the fee interests in certain of their principal plants as tenants in common. See "Jointly-Owned Facilities" herein and Note 5 to the financial statements under "Joint Ownership Agreements" in Item 8 herein for additional information. Properties such as electric transmission and distribution lines, steam heating mains, and gas pipelines are constructed principally on rights-of-way, which are maintained under franchise or are held by easement only. A substantial portion of lands submerged by reservoirs is held under flood right easements. In addition, certain of the renewable generating facilities occupy or use real property that is not owned, primarily through various leases, easements, rights-of-way, permits, or licenses from private landowners or governmental entities.
Natural Gas
Southern Company Gas considers its properties to be adequately maintained, substantially in good operating condition, and suitable for their intended purpose. The following provides the location and general character of the materially important properties that are used by the segments of Southern Company Gas. Substantially all of Nicor Gas' properties are subject to the lien of the indenture securing its first mortgage bonds. See Note 68 to the financial statements of under "Long-term DebtOther Long-Term DebtSouthern Company Gas under "Long-Term Debt – First Mortgage Bonds"" in Item 8 herein for additional information.
Distribution and Transmission Mains – Southern Company Gas' distribution systems transport natural gas from its pipeline suppliers to customers in its service areas. These systems consist primarily of distribution and transmission mains, compressor stations, peak shaving/storage plants, service lines, meters, and regulators. At December 31, 2017,2018, Southern Company Gas' gas distribution operations segment owned approximately 82,00075,200 miles of underground distribution and transmission mains, which are located on easements or rights-of-way that generally provide for perpetual use.
Storage Assets – Gas Distribution Operations – Southern Company Gas owns and operates eight underground natural gas storage facilitiesfields in Illinois with a total inventoryworking capacity of approximately 150 Bcf, approximately 135 Bcf of which can beis usually cycled on an annual basis. This system is designed to meet about 50% of the estimated peak-day deliveries and approximately 40% of the normal winter deliveries in Illinois. This level of storage capability provides Nicor Gas with supply flexibility, improves the reliability of deliveries, and helps mitigate the risk associated with seasonal price movements.

I-44

Table of ContentsIndex to Financial Statements

Southern Company Gas also has five liquefied natural gas (LNG)four LNG plants located in Georgia New Jersey, and Tennessee with total LNG storage capacity of approximately 7.67.4 Bcf. In addition, Southern Company Gas owns onetwo propane storage facilityfacilities in Virginia, each with storage capacity of approximately 0.3 Bcf. The LNG plants and propane storage facility are used by Southern Company Gas' gas distribution operations segment to supplement natural gas supply during peak usage periods.
Storage Assets – All Other – Southern Company Gas subsidiaries own three high-deliverability natural gas storage and hub facilities that are operated byincluded in the gas midstream operationsall other segment. Jefferson Island Storage & Hub, LLC operates a storage facility in Louisiana consisting of two salt dome gas storage caverns. Golden Triangle Storage, Inc. operates a storage facility in Texas consisting of two salt dome caverns. Central Valley Gas Storage, LLC operates a depleted field storage facility in California. In addition, Southern Company Gas has a LNG facility in Alabama that produces LNG for Pivotal LNG, Inc. to support its business of selling LNG as a substitute fuel in various markets.

I-44

Table of ContentsIndex to Financial Statements

In August 2017, in connection with an ongoing integrity project into the salt dome gas storage caverns in Louisiana, updated seismic mapping indicated the proximity of one of the caverns to the edge of the salt dome may be less than the required minimum and could result in Southern Company Gas retiring the cavern early. See FUTURE EARNINGS POTENTIAL – "Other Matters" of Southern Company Gas in Item 7 herein and Note 3 to the financial statements of Southern Company and under "Other MattersSouthern Company Gas" in Item 8 herein for additional information.
Jointly-Owned Properties – Southern Company Gas' gas midstream operationspipeline investments segment has a 50% undivided ownership interest in a 115-mile pipeline facility in northwest Georgia that was placed in service onin August 1, 2017. Southern Company Gas also has an agreement to lease its 50% undivided ownership in the pipeline facility. See Note 45 to the financial statements of Southern Company and Southern Company Gasunder "Joint Ownership Agreements" in Item 8 herein for additional information.

Southern Company Gas owns a 50% interest in a LNG liquefaction and storage facility in Jacksonville, Florida, which was placed in service in October 2018 and is included in the all other segment. The facility is outfitted with a 2.0 million gallon storage tank with the capacity to produce in excess of 120,000 gallons of LNG per day.

I-45

    Table of Contents                                Index to Financial Statements

Item 3.LEGAL PROCEEDINGS
See Note 3 to the financial statements of each registrant in Item 8 herein for descriptions of legal and administrative proceedings discussed therein.
Item 4.MINE SAFETY DISCLOSURES
Not applicable.

I-46

    Table of Contents                                Index to Financial Statements

EXECUTIVE OFFICERS OF SOUTHERN COMPANY
(Identification of executive officers of Southern Company is inserted in Part I in accordance with Regulation S-K, Item 401(b), Instruction 3.) The ages of the officers set forth below are as of December 31, 2017.2018.
Thomas A. Fanning
Chairman, President, and Chief Executive Officer
Age 6061
ElectedFirst elected in 2003. Chairman and Chief Executive Officer since December 2010 and President since August 2010.
Art P. BeattieAndrew W. Evans
Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
Age 6352
ElectedFirst elected in 2010. Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer since August 2010.
W. Paul Bowers
Executive Vice President
Age 61
Elected in 2001. Executive Vice President since February 2008 and Chief Executive Officer, President, and Director of Georgia Power since January 2011. Chairman of Georgia Power's Board of Directors since May 2014.
S. W. Connally, Jr.
Chairman, President, and Chief Executive Officer of Gulf Power
Age 48
Elected in 2012. Elected Chairman in July 2015 and President, Chief Executive Officer, and Director of Gulf Power since July 2012.
Mark A. Crosswhite
Executive Vice President
Age 55
Elected in 2010. Executive Vice President since July 2012 and President, Chief Executive Officer, and Director of Alabama Power since March 2014. Chairman of Alabama Power's Board of Directors since May 2014. Previously served as Executive Vice President and Chief Operating Officer of Southern Company from July 2012 through February 2014.
Andrew W. Evans
Executive Vice President
Age 51
Elected in July 2016. Executive Vice President since July 2016. President of Southern Company Gas2016 and Chief Financial Officer since May 2015 andJune 2018. Previously served as Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of Southern Company Gas' Board of Directors sincefrom January 2016. Previously served as2016 through June 2018, President of Southern Company Gas from May 2015 through June 2018, Chief Operating Officer of Southern Company Gas from May 2015 through December 2015, and Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of Southern Company Gas from May 2006 through May 2015.
Kimberly S. Greene
Executive Vice President
Age 51
Elected in 2013. Executive Vice President and Chief Operating Officer since March 2014. Director of Southern Company Gas since July 2016. Previously served as President and Chief Executive Officer of SCS from April 2013 to February 2014. Before rejoining Southern Company, Ms. Greene served at Tennessee Valley Authority as Executive Vice President and Chief Generation Officer from 2011 through April 2013.
James Y. Kerr II
Executive Vice President and General Counsel
Age 53
Elected in 2014. Also serves as Chief Compliance Officer. Before joining Southern Company, Mr. Kerr was a partner with McGuireWoods LLP and a senior advisor at McGuireWoods Consulting LLC from 2008 through February 2014.
Stephen E. KuczynskiW. Paul Bowers
Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer of Southern NuclearGeorgia Power
Age 5562
ElectedFirst elected in 2011. Chairman, President, and2001. Chief Executive Officer, of Southern Nuclear since July 2011.

I-47

Table of ContentsIndex to Financial Statements

Mark S. Lantrip
Executive Vice President
Age 63
Elected in 2014. Chairman, President, and Chief Executive OfficerDirector of SCSGeorgia Power since March 2014. Previously served as TreasurerJanuary 2011. Chairman of Southern Company from October 2007 to February 2014 and Executive Vice PresidentGeorgia Power's Board of SCS from November 2010 to MarchDirectors since May 2014.
Nancy E. SykesS. W. Connally, Jr.
Executive Vice President of SCS
Age 49
ElectedFirst elected in 2016. Also serves2012. Executive Vice President for Operations of SCS since June 2018. Previously served as President, Chief Human ResourcesExecutive Officer, and Director of Gulf Power from July 2012 through December 2018 and Chairman of Gulf Power's Board of Directors from July 2015 through December 2018.
Mark A. Crosswhite
Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer of SCS.Alabama Power
Age 56
First elected in 2010. President, Chief Executive Officer, and Director of Alabama Power since March 2014. Chairman of Alabama Power's Board of Directors since May 2014. Previously served as Executive Vice President and Chief Operating Officer of Southern Company from July 2012 through February 2014.
Kimberly S. Greene
Chairman, President, and Chief Executive Officer of Southern Company Gas
Age 52
First elected in 2013. Chairman, President, and Chief Executive Officer of Southern Company Gas since June 2018. Director of Southern Company Gas since July 2016. Previously served as Executive Vice President and Chief Operating Officer of Southern Company from March 2014 through June 2018 and President and Chief Executive Officer of SCS from April 2013 through February 2014.
James Y. Kerr II
Executive Vice President, Chief Legal Officer, and Chief Compliance Officer
Age 54
First elected in 2014. Executive Vice President, Chief Legal Officer (formerly known as General Counsel), and Chief Compliance Officer since March 2014. Before joining Southern Company, Ms. Sykes served as vice presidentMr. Kerr was a partner with McGuireWoods LLP and chief human resources officera senior advisor at United States Steel CorporationMcGuireWoods Consulting LLC from May 20152008 through February 2014.
Stephen E. Kuczynski
Chairman, President, and Chief Executive Officer of Southern Nuclear
Age 56
First elected in 2011. Chairman, President, and Chief Executive Officer of Southern Nuclear since July 2011.

I-47

Table of ContentsIndex to November 2016.Financial Statements

Mark S. Lantrip
Executive Vice President
Age 64
First elected in 2014. Executive Vice President since February 2019. Chairman, President, and Chief Executive Officer of SCS since March 2014 and Chairman, President, and Chief Executive Officer of Southern Power since March 2018. Previously served as Vice President, Human Resources Asia-Pacific at Goodyear Tire and RubberTreasurer of Southern Company from October 2012 until May 2015.2007 to February 2014 and Executive Vice President of SCS from November 2010 to March 2014.
Anthony L. Wilson
Chairman, President, and Chief Executive Officer of Mississippi Power
Age 5354
ElectedFirst elected in 2015. President of Mississippi Power since October 2015 and Chief Executive Officer and Director since January 2016. Chairman of Mississippi Power's Board of Directors since August 2016. Previously served as Executive Vice President of Mississippi Power from May 2015 to October 2015 and Executive Vice President of Georgia Power from January 2012 to May 2015.
Christopher C. Womack
Executive Vice President
Age 5960
ElectedFirst elected in 2008. Executive Vice President and President of External Affairs since January 2009.
The officers of Southern Company were elected at the first meeting of the directors following the last annual meeting of stockholders held on May 24, 2017,23, 2018, for a term of one year or until their successors are elected and have qualified.qualified, except for Mr. Lantrip, whose election as Executive Vice President was effective February 11, 2019.


I-48

    Table of Contents                                Index to Financial Statements

EXECUTIVE OFFICERS OF ALABAMA POWER
(Identification of executive officers of Alabama Power is inserted in Part I in accordance with Regulation S-K, Item 401(b), Instruction 3.) The ages of the officers set forth below are as of December 31, 2017.2018.
Mark A. Crosswhite
Chairman, President, and Chief Executive Officer
Age 5556
ElectedFirst elected in 2014. President, Chief Executive Officer, and Director since March 1, 2014. Chairman since May 2014. Previously served as Executive Vice President and Chief Operating Officer of Southern Company from July 2012 through February 2014.
Greg J. Barker
Executive Vice President
Age 5455
ElectedFirst elected in 2016. Executive Vice President for Customer Services since February 2016. Previously served as Senior Vice President of Marketing and Economic Development from April 2012 to February 2016.
Philip C. Raymond
Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer, and Treasurer
Age 5859
ElectedFirst elected in 2010. Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer, and Treasurer since August 2010.
Zeke W. Smith
Executive Vice President
Age 5859
ElectedFirst elected in 2010. Executive Vice President of External Affairs since November 2010.
James P. Heilbron
Senior Vice President and Senior Production Officer
Age 4647
ElectedFirst elected in 2013. Senior Vice President and Senior Production Officer of Alabama Power since March 2013. Previously served as2013 and Senior Vice President and Senior Production Officer – West of SouthernSCS and Senior Production Officer of Mississippi Power Company from July 2010 to February 2013.since October 2018.
R. Scott Moore
Senior Vice President
Age 5051
ElectedFirst elected in 2017. Senior Vice President of Power Delivery since May 2017. Previously served as Vice President of Transmission from August 2012 to May 2017.
The officers of Alabama Power were elected at the meeting of the directors held on April 28, 2017 for a term of one year or until their successors are elected and have qualified, except for Mr. Moore, whose election as Senior Vice President was effective May 20, 2017.

I-49

Table of ContentsIndex to Financial Statements

EXECUTIVE OFFICERS OF MISSISSIPPI POWER
(Identification of executive officers of Mississippi Power is inserted in Part I in accordance with Regulation S-K, Item 401(b), Instruction 3.) The ages of the officers set forth below are as of December 31, 2017.
Anthony L. Wilson
Chairman, President, and Chief Executive Officer
Age 53
Elected in 2015. President since October 2015 and Chief Executive Officer and Director since January 2016. Chairman of Mississippi Power's Board since August 2016. Previously served as Executive Vice President from May 2015 to October 2015 and Executive Vice President of Georgia Power from January 2012 to May 2015.
John W. Atherton
Vice President
Age 57
Elected in 2004. Vice President of Corporate Services and Community Relations since October 2012.
A. Nicole Faulk
Vice President
Age 44
Elected in 2015. Vice President of Customer Services Organization effective April 2015. Previously served as Region Vice President for the West Region of Georgia Power from March 2015 through April 2015 and Region Manager for the Metro West Region of Georgia Power from December 2011 to March 2015.
Moses H. Feagin
Vice President, Treasurer, and Chief Financial Officer
Age 53
Elected in 2010. Vice President, Treasurer, and Chief Financial Officer since August 2010.
R. Allen Reaves, Jr.
Vice President
Age 58
Elected in 2010. Vice President and Senior Production Officer since August 2010.
Billy F. Thornton
Vice President
Age 57
Elected in 2012. Vice President of External Affairs since October 2012.
The officers of Mississippi Power were elected at the meeting of the directors held on May 1, 201727, 2018 for a term of one year or until their successors are elected and have qualified.

I-50I-49

    Table of Contents                                Index to Financial Statements

PART II

Item 5.MARKET FOR REGISTRANTS' COMMON EQUITY, RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS AND ISSUER PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES
(a)(1) The common stock of Southern Company is listed and traded on the NYSE.NYSE under the ticker symbol SO. The common stock is also traded on regional exchanges across the U.S. The high and low stock prices as reported on the NYSE for each quarter of the past two years were as follows:
  High Low
2017    
First Quarter $51.47
 $47.57
Second Quarter 51.97
 47.87
Third Quarter 50.80
 46.71
Fourth Quarter 53.51
 47.92
2016    
First Quarter $51.73
 $46.00
Second Quarter 53.64
 47.62
Third Quarter 54.64
 50.00
Fourth Quarter 52.23
 46.20
There is no market for the other registrants' common stock, all of which is owned by Southern Company.
(a)(2) Number of Southern Company's common stockholders of record at January 31, 2018: 120,4132019: 115,847
Each of the other registrants have one common stockholder, Southern Company.
Table of ContentsIndex to Financial Statements

(a)(3) Dividends on each registrant's common stock are payable at the discretion of their respective board of directors and depend upon earnings, financial condition, and other factors. The dividends on common stock declared by Southern Company, the traditional electric operating companies (other than Mississippi Power), Southern Power Company, and Southern Company Gas to their stockholder(s) for the past two years are set forth below. No dividends were declared by Mississippi Power on its common stock in 2016 or 2017. Southern Company Gas' dividends are only shown for periods subsequent to the Merger.
Registrant Quarter 2017 2016
    (in thousands)
Southern Company First $555,791
 $496,718
  Second 578,525
 526,267
  Third 581,501
 529,876
  Fourth 584,015
 551,110
Alabama Power First 178,507
 191,206
  Second 178,507
 191,206
  Third 178,507
 191,206
  Fourth 178,507
 191,206
Georgia Power First 320,242
 326,269
  Second 320,242
 326,269
  Third 320,242
 326,269
  Fourth 320,242
 326,269
Gulf Power First 31,250
 30,017
  Second 31,250
 30,017
  Third 31,250
 30,017
  Fourth 71,250
 30,017
Southern Power Company First 79,211
 68,082
  Second 79,211
 68,082
  Third 79,211
 68,082
  Fourth 79,211
 68,082
Southern Company Gas First 110,641
 
  Second 110,641
 
  Third 110,641
 62,750
  Fourth 110,641
 62,750
The dividend paid per share of Southern Company's common stock was 56.00¢ for the first quarter 2017 and 58.00¢ each for the second, third, and fourth quarters of 2017. In 2016, Southern Company paid a dividend per share of 54.25¢ for the first quarter and 56.00¢ each for the second, third, and fourth quarters.
The traditional electric operating companies and Southern Power Company can only pay dividends to Southern Company out of retained earnings or paid-in-capital. The authority of the natural gas distribution utilities to pay dividends to Southern Company Gas is subject to regulation. By regulation, Nicor Gas is restricted, to the extent of its retained earnings balance, in the amount it can dividend or loan to affiliates. Additionally, Elizabethtown Gas is restricted by its policy, as established by the New Jersey Board of Public Utilities, to 70% of its quarterly net income it can dividend to Southern Company Gas. Also, as stipulated in the New Jersey Board of Public Utilities' order approving the Merger, Southern Company Gas is prohibited from paying dividends to its parent company, Southern Company, if Southern Company Gas' senior unsecured debt rating falls below investment grade.
(a)(4) Securities authorized for issuance under equity compensation plans.
See Part III, Item 12. Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters.
(b) Use of Proceeds
Not applicable.
(c) Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities
None.
    Table of Contents                                Index to Financial Statements

Item 6.SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA
 Page

SELECTED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL AND OPERATING DATA 2014-2018
Southern Company and Subsidiary Companies 2018 Annual Report
 2018
 2017
 
2016(d)

 2015
 2014
Operating Revenues (in millions)$23,495
 $23,031
 $19,896
 $17,489
 $18,467
Total Assets (in millions)(a)
$116,914
 $111,005
 $109,697
 $78,318
 $70,233
Gross Property Additions (in millions)$8,205
 $5,984
 $7,624
 $6,169
 $6,522
Return on Average Common Equity (percent)(b)
9.11
 3.44
 10.80
 11.68
 10.08
Cash Dividends Paid Per Share of
 Common Stock
$2.3800
 $2.3000
 $2.2225
 $2.1525
 $2.0825
Consolidated Net Income Attributable to
   Southern Company (in millions)(b)
$2,226
 $842
 $2,448
 $2,367
 $1,963
Earnings Per Share —         
Basic$2.18
 $0.84
 $2.57
 $2.60
 $2.19
Diluted2.17
 0.84
 2.55
 2.59
 2.18
Capitalization (in millions):         
Common stockholders' equity$24,723
 $24,167
 $24,758
 $20,592
 $19,949
Preferred and preference stock of subsidiaries and
   noncontrolling interests
4,316
 1,361
 1,854
 1,390
 977
Redeemable preferred stock of subsidiaries291
 324
 118
 118
 375
Redeemable noncontrolling interests
 
 164
 43
 39
Long-term debt(a)(c)
40,736
 44,462
 42,629
 24,688
 20,644
Total (excluding amounts due within one year)(c)
$70,066
 $70,314
 $69,523
 $46,831
 $41,984
Capitalization Ratios (percent):         
Common stockholders' equity35.3
 34.4
 35.6
 44.0
 47.5
Preferred and preference stock of subsidiaries and
   noncontrolling interests
6.2
 1.9
 2.7
 3.0
 2.3
Redeemable preferred stock of subsidiaries0.4
 0.5
 0.2
 0.3
 0.9
Redeemable noncontrolling interests
 
 0.2
 0.1
 0.1
Long-term debt(a)(c)
58.1
 63.2
 61.3
 52.6
 49.2
Total (excluding amounts due within one year)(c)
100.0
 100.0
 100.0
 100.0
 100.0
Other Common Stock Data:         
Book value per share$23.91
 $23.99
 $25.00
 $22.59
 $21.98
Market price per share:         
High$49.43
 $53.51
 $54.64
 $53.16
 $51.28
Low42.38
 46.71
 46.00
 41.40
 40.27
Close (year-end)43.92
 48.09
 49.19
 46.79
 49.11
Market-to-book ratio (year-end) (percent)183.7
 200.5
 196.8
 207.2
 223.4
Price-earnings ratio (year-end) (times)20.1
 57.3
 19.1
 18.0
 22.4
Dividends paid (in millions)$2,425
 $2,300
 $2,104
 $1,959
 $1,866
Dividend yield (year-end) (percent)5.4
 4.8
 4.5
 4.6
 4.2
Dividend payout ratio (percent)108.9
 273.2
 86.0
 82.7
 95.0
Shares outstanding (in thousands):         
Average1,020,247
 1,000,336
 951,332
 910,024
 897,194
Year-end1,033,788
 1,007,603
 990,394
 911,721
 907,777
Stockholders of record (year-end)116,135
 120,803
 126,338
 131,771
 137,369
(a)A reclassification of debt issuance costs from Total Assets to Long-term debt of $202 million and a reclassification of deferred tax assets from Total Assets to Accumulated deferred income taxes of $488 million is reflected for 2014, in accordance with new accounting standards adopted in 2015 and applied retrospectively.
(b)Georgia Power recorded a pre-tax estimated probable loss of $1.1 billion ($0.8 billion after tax) in the second quarter 2018 to reflect its revised estimate to complete construction and start-up of Plant Vogtle Units 3 and 4. In addition, a significant loss to income was recorded by Mississippi Power related to the suspension of the Kemper IGCC in June 2017. Earnings in all periods presented were impacted by losses related to the Kemper IGCC. See Note 2 to the financial statements in Item 8 herein for additional information.
(c)Amounts related to Gulf Power have been reclassified to liabilities held for sale at December 31, 2018. See Note 15 to the financial statements under "Southern Company's Sale of Gulf Power" in Item 8 herein for additional information.
(d)The 2016 selected financial and operating data includes the operations of Southern Company Gas from the date of the Merger, July 1, 2016, through December 31, 2016. See Note 15 to the financial statements under "Southern Company Merger with Southern Company Gas" in Item 8 herein for additional information.

SELECTED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL AND OPERATING DATA 2014-2018 (continued)
Southern Company and Subsidiary Companies 2018 Annual Report
 2018
 2017
 
2016(a)

 2015
 2014
Operating Revenues (in millions):         
Residential$6,608
 $6,515
 $6,614
 $6,383
 $6,499
Commercial5,266
 5,439
 5,394
 5,317
 5,469
Industrial3,224
 3,262
 3,171
 3,172
 3,449
Other124
 114
 55
 115
 133
Total retail15,222
 15,330
 15,234
 14,987
 15,550
Wholesale2,516
 2,426
 1,926
 1,798
 2,184
Total revenues from sales of electricity17,738
 17,756
 17,160
 16,785
 17,734
Natural gas revenues3,854
 3,791
 1,596
 
 
Other revenues1,903
 1,484
 1,140
 704
 733
Total$23,495
 $23,031
 $19,896
 $17,489
 $18,467
Kilowatt-Hour Sales (in millions):         
Residential54,590
 50,536
 53,337
 52,121
 53,347
Commercial53,451
 52,340
 53,733
 53,525
 53,243
Industrial53,341
 52,785
 52,792
 53,941
 54,140
Other799
 846
 883
 897
 909
Total retail162,181
 156,507
 160,745
 160,484
 161,639
Wholesale sales49,963
 49,034
 37,043
 30,505
 32,786
Total212,144
 205,541
 197,788
 190,989
 194,425
Average Revenue Per Kilowatt-Hour (cents):         
Residential12.10
 12.89
 12.40
 12.25
 12.18
Commercial9.85
 10.39
 10.04
 9.93
 10.27
Industrial6.04
 6.18
 6.01
 5.88
 6.37
Total retail9.39
 9.80
 9.48
 9.34
 9.62
Wholesale5.04
 4.95
 5.20
 5.89
 6.66
Total sales8.36
 8.64
 8.68
 8.79
 9.12
Average Annual Kilowatt-Hour         
Use Per Residential Customer12,514
 11,618
 12,387
 13,318
 13,765
Average Annual Revenue         
Per Residential Customer$1,555
 $1,498
 $1,541
 $1,630
 $1,679
Plant Nameplate Capacity         
Ratings (year-end) (megawatts)45,824
 46,936
 46,291
 44,223
 46,549
Maximum Peak-Hour Demand (megawatts):         
Winter36,429
 31,956
 32,272
 36,794
 37,234
Summer34,841
 34,874
 35,781
 36,195
 35,396
System Reserve Margin (at peak) (percent)29.8
 30.8
 34.2
 33.2
 19.8
Annual Load Factor (percent)61.2
 61.4
 61.5
 59.9
 59.6
Plant Availability (percent):         
Fossil-steam81.4
 84.5
 86.4
 86.1
 85.8
Nuclear94.0
 94.7
 93.3
 93.5
 91.5
(a)The 2016 selected financial and operating data includes the operations of Southern Company Gas from the date of the Merger, July 1, 2016, through December 31, 2016. See Note 15 to the financial statements under "Southern Company Merger with Southern Company Gas" in Item 8 herein for additional information.

SELECTED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL AND OPERATING DATA 2014-2018 (continued)
Southern Company and Subsidiary Companies 2018 Annual Report
 2018
 2017
 
2016(a)

 2015
 2014
Source of Energy Supply (percent):         
Gas41.6
 41.9
 41.7
 42.7
 37.0
Coal27.0
 27.0
 30.3
 32.3
 39.3
Nuclear13.8
 14.5
 14.5
 15.2
 14.8
Hydro2.9
 2.1
 2.1
 2.6
 2.5
Other5.4
 5.4
 2.4
 0.8
 0.4
Purchased power9.3
 9.1
 9.0
 6.4
 6.0
Total100.0
 100.0
 100.0
 100.0
 100.0
Gas Sales Volumes (mmBtu in millions):         
Firm791
 729
 296
 
 
Interruptible109
 109
 53
 
 
Total900
 838
 349
 
 
Traditional Electric Operating Company
   Customers (year-end) (in thousands):
         
Residential4,053
 4,011
 3,970
 3,928
 3,890
Commercial(b)
603
 599
 595
 590
 586
Industrial(b)
17
 18
 17
 17
 17
Other12
 12
 11
 11
 11
Total electric customers4,685
 4,640
 4,593
 4,546
 4,504
Gas distribution operations customers4,248
 4,623
 4,586
 
 
Total utility customers8,933
 9,263
 9,179
 4,546
 4,504
Employees (year-end)30,286
 31,344
 32,015
 26,703
 26,369
(a)The 2016 selected financial and operating data includes the operations of Southern Company Gas from the date of the Merger, July 1, 2016, through December 31, 2016. See Note 15 to the financial statements under "Southern Company Merger with Southern Company Gas" in Item 8 herein for additional information.
(b)A reclassification of customers from commercial to industrial is reflected for years 2014-2015 to be consistent with the rate structure approved by the Georgia PSC. The impact to operating revenues, kilowatt-hour sales, and average revenue per kilowatt-hour by class is not material.


SELECTED FINANCIAL AND OPERATING DATA 2014-2018
Alabama Power Company 2018 Annual Report
 2018
 2017
 2016
 2015
 2014
Operating Revenues (in millions)$6,032
 $6,039
 $5,889
 $5,768
 $5,942
Net Income After Dividends
on Preferred and Preference Stock (in millions)
$930
 $848
 $822
 $785
 $761
Cash Dividends on Common Stock (in millions)$801
 $714
 $765
 $571
 $550
Return on Average Common Equity (percent)13.00
 12.89
 13.34
 13.37
 13.52
Total Assets (in millions)(*)
$26,730
 $23,864
 $22,516
 $21,721
 $20,493
Gross Property Additions (in millions)$2,273
 $1,949
 $1,338
 $1,492
 $1,543
Capitalization (in millions):         
Common stockholder's equity$7,477
 $6,829
 $6,323
 $5,992
 $5,752
Preference stock
 
 196
 196
 343
Redeemable preferred stock291
 291
 85
 85
 342
Long-term debt(*)
7,923
 7,628
 6,535
 6,654
 6,137
Total (excluding amounts due within one year)$15,691
 $14,748
 $13,139
 $12,927
 $12,574
Capitalization Ratios (percent):         
Common stockholder's equity47.7
 46.3
 48.1
 46.4
 45.8
Preference stock
 
 1.5
 1.5
 2.7
Redeemable preferred stock1.9
 2.0
 0.7
 0.7
 2.7
Long-term debt(*)
50.4
 51.7
 49.7
 51.4
 48.8
Total (excluding amounts due within one year)100.0
 100.0
 100.0
 100.0
 100.0
Customers (year-end):         
Residential1,273,526
 1,268,271
 1,262,752
 1,253,875
 1,247,061
Commercial200,032
 199,840
 199,146
 197,920
 197,082
Industrial6,158
 6,171
 6,090
 6,056
 6,032
Other760
 766
 762
 757
 753
Total1,480,476
 1,475,048
 1,468,750
 1,458,608
 1,450,928
Employees (year-end)6,650
 6,613
 6,805
 6,986
 6,935
(*)A reclassification of debt issuance costs from Total Assets to Long-term debt of $40 million and a reclassification of deferred tax assets from Total Assets to Accumulated deferred income taxes of $20 million is reflected for 2014, in accordance with new accounting standards adopted in 2015 and applied retrospectively.

























SELECTED FINANCIAL AND OPERATING DATA 2014-2018 (continued)
Alabama Power Company 2018 Annual Report
 2018
 2017
 2016
 2015
 2014
Operating Revenues (in millions):
         
Residential$2,335
 $2,302
 $2,322
 $2,207
 $2,209
Commercial1,578
 1,649
 1,627
 1,564
 1,533
Industrial1,428
 1,477
 1,416
 1,436
 1,480
Other26
 30
 (43) 27
 27
Total retail5,367
 5,458
 5,322
 5,234
 5,249
Wholesale — non-affiliates279
 276
 283
 241
 281
Wholesale — affiliates119
 97
 69
 84
 189
Total revenues from sales of electricity5,765
 5,831
 5,674
 5,559
 5,719
Other revenues267
 208
 215
 209
 223
Total$6,032
 $6,039
 $5,889
 $5,768
 $5,942
Kilowatt-Hour Sales (in millions):
         
Residential18,626
 17,219
 18,343
 18,082
 18,726
Commercial13,868
 13,606
 14,091
 14,102
 14,118
Industrial23,006
 22,687
 22,310
 23,380
 23,799
Other187
 198
 208
 201
 211
Total retail55,687
 53,710
 54,952
 55,765
 56,854
Wholesale — non-affiliates5,018
 5,415
 5,744
 3,567
 3,588
Wholesale — affiliates4,565
 4,166
 3,177
 4,515
 6,713
Total65,270
 63,291
 63,873
 63,847
 67,155
Average Revenue Per Kilowatt-Hour (cents):
         
Residential12.54
 13.37
 12.66
 12.21
 11.80
Commercial11.38
 12.12
 11.55
 11.09
 10.86
Industrial6.21
 6.51
 6.35
 6.14
 6.22
Total retail9.64
 10.16
 9.68
 9.39
 9.23
Wholesale4.15
 3.89
 3.95
 4.02
 4.56
Total sales8.83
 9.21
 8.88
 8.71
 8.52
Residential Average Annual
Kilowatt-Hour Use Per Customer
14,660
 13,601
 14,568
 14,454
 15,051
Residential Average Annual
Revenue Per Customer
$1,878
 $1,819
 $1,844
 $1,764
 $1,775
Plant Nameplate Capacity
Ratings (year-end) (megawatts)
11,815
 11,797
 11,797
 11,797
 12,222
Maximum Peak-Hour Demand (megawatts):
         
Winter11,744
 10,513
 10,282
 12,162
 11,761
Summer10,652
 10,711
 10,932
 11,292
 11,054
Annual Load Factor (percent)
60.1
 63.5
 63.5
 58.4
 61.4
Plant Availability (percent):
         
Fossil-steam81.6
 82.8
 83.0
 81.5
 82.5
Nuclear91.6
 97.6
 88.0
 92.1
 93.3
Source of Energy Supply (percent):
         
Coal43.8
 44.8
 47.1
 49.1
 49.0
Nuclear20.5
 22.2
 20.3
 21.3
 20.7
Gas17.2
 18.1
 17.1
 14.6
 15.4
Hydro6.7
 5.4
 4.8
 5.6
 5.5
Purchased power —         
From non-affiliates5.4
 4.6
 4.8
 4.4
 3.6
From affiliates6.4
 4.9
 5.9
 5.0
 5.8
Total100.0
 100.0
 100.0
 100.0
 100.0


SELECTED FINANCIAL AND OPERATING DATA 2014-2018
Georgia Power Company 2018 Annual Report
 2018
 2017
 2016
 2015
 2014
Operating Revenues (in millions)$8,420
 $8,310
 $8,383
 $8,326
 $8,988
Net Income After Dividends
on Preferred and Preference Stock (in millions)
(a)
$793
 $1,414
 $1,330
 $1,260
 $1,225
Cash Dividends on Common Stock (in millions)$1,396
 $1,281
 $1,305
 $1,034
 $954
Return on Average Common Equity (percent)6.04
 12.15
 12.05
 11.92
 12.24
Total Assets (in millions)(b)
$40,365
 $36,779
 $34,835
 $32,865
 $30,872
Gross Property Additions (in millions)$3,176
 $1,080
 $2,314
 $2,332
 $2,146
Capitalization (in millions):
        
Common stockholder's equity$14,323
 $11,931
 $11,356
 $10,719
 $10,421
Preferred and preference stock
 
 266
 266
 266
Long-term debt(b)
9,364
 11,073
 10,225
 9,616
 8,563
Total (excluding amounts due within one year)$23,687
 $23,004
 $21,847
 $20,601
 $19,250
Capitalization Ratios (percent):
        
Common stockholder's equity60.5
 51.9
 52.0
 52.0
 54.1
Preferred and preference stock
 
 1.2
 1.3
 1.4
Long-term debt(b)
39.5
 48.1
 46.8
 46.7
 44.5
Total (excluding amounts due within one year)100.0
 100.0
 100.0
 100.0
 100.0
Customers (year-end):         
Residential2,220,240
 2,185,782
 2,155,945
 2,127,658
 2,102,673
Commercial(c)
312,474
 308,939
 305,488
 302,891
 300,186
Industrial(c)
10,571
 10,644
 10,537
 10,429
 10,192
Other9,838
 9,766
 9,585
 9,261
 9,003
Total2,553,123
 2,515,131
 2,481,555
 2,450,239
 2,422,054
Employees (year-end)6,967
 6,986
 7,527
 7,989
 7,909
(a)Georgia Power recorded a pre-tax estimated probable loss of $1.1 billion ($0.8 billion after tax) in the second quarter 2018 to reflect its revised estimate to complete construction and start-up of Plant Vogtle Units 3 and 4.
(b)A reclassification of debt issuance costs from Total Assets to Long-term debt of $124 million and a reclassification of deferred tax assets from Total Assets to Accumulated deferred income taxes of $34 million is reflected for 2014, in accordance with new accounting standards adopted in 2015 and applied retrospectively.
(c)A reclassification of customers from commercial to industrial is reflected for years 2014-2015 to be consistent with the rate structure approved by the Georgia PSC. The impact to operating revenues, kilowatt-hour sales, and average revenue per kilowatt-hour by class is not material.


SELECTED FINANCIAL AND OPERATING DATA 2014-2018 (continued)
Georgia Power Company 2018 Annual Report
 2018
 2017
 2016
 2015
 2014
Operating Revenues (in millions):         
Residential$3,301
 $3,236
 $3,318
 $3,240
 $3,350
Commercial3,023
 3,092
 3,077
 3,094
 3,271
Industrial1,344
 1,321
 1,291
 1,305
 1,525
Other84
 89
 86
 88
 94
Total retail7,752
 7,738
 7,772
 7,727
 8,240
Wholesale — non-affiliates163
 163
 175
 215
 335
Wholesale — affiliates24
 26
 42
 20
 42
Total revenues from sales of electricity7,939
 7,927
 7,989
 7,962
 8,617
Other revenues481
 383
 394
 364
 371
Total$8,420
 $8,310
 $8,383
 $8,326
 $8,988
Kilowatt-Hour Sales (in millions):         
Residential28,331
 26,144
 27,585
 26,649
 27,132
Commercial32,958
 32,155
 32,932
 32,719
 32,426
Industrial23,655
 23,518
 23,746
 23,805
 23,549
Other549
 584
 610
 632
 633
Total retail85,493
 82,401
 84,873
 83,805
 83,740
Wholesale — non-affiliates3,140
 3,277
 3,415
 3,501
 4,323
Wholesale — affiliates526
 800
 1,398
 552
 1,117
Total89,159
 86,478
 89,686
 87,858
 89,180
Average Revenue Per Kilowatt-Hour (cents):         
Residential11.65
 12.38
 12.03
 12.16
 12.35
Commercial9.17
 9.62
 9.34
 9.46
 10.09
Industrial5.68
 5.62
 5.44
 5.48
 6.48
Total retail9.07
 9.39
 9.16
 9.22
 9.84
Wholesale5.10
 4.64
 4.51
 5.80
 6.93
Total sales8.90
 9.17
 8.91
 9.06
 9.66
Residential Average Annual
Kilowatt-Hour Use Per Customer
12,849
 12,028
 12,864
 12,582
 12,969
Residential Average Annual
Revenue Per Customer
$1,555
 $1,489
 $1,557
 $1,529
 $1,605
Plant Nameplate Capacity
Ratings (year-end) (megawatts)
15,308
 15,274
 15,274
 15,455
 17,593
Maximum Peak-Hour Demand (megawatts):         
Winter15,372
 13,894
 14,527
 15,735
 16,308
Summer15,748
 16,002
 16,244
 16,104
 15,777
Annual Load Factor (percent)64.5
 61.1
 61.9
 61.9
 61.2
Plant Availability (percent):         
Fossil-steam81.5
 85.0
 87.4
 85.6
 86.3
Nuclear95.0
 93.5
 95.6
 94.1
 90.8
Source of Energy Supply (percent):         
Gas29.1
 28.6
 28.2
 28.3
 26.3
Coal21.1
 22.4
 26.4
 24.5
 30.9
Nuclear17.6
 17.8
 17.6
 17.6
 16.7
Hydro1.9
 1.0
 1.1
 1.6
 1.3
Other0.3
 0.3
 
 
 
Purchased power —         
From non-affiliates7.3
 7.8
 6.7
 5.0
 3.8
From affiliates22.7
 22.1
 20.0
 23.0
 21.0
Total100.0
 100.0
 100.0
 100.0
 100.0


SELECTED FINANCIAL AND OPERATING DATA 2014-2018
Mississippi Power Company 2018 Annual Report
 2018
 2017
 2016
 2015
 2014
Operating Revenues (in millions)$1,265
 $1,187
 $1,163
 $1,138
 $1,243
Net Income (Loss) After Dividends
on Preferred Stock (in millions)
(a)(b)
$235
 $(2,590) $(50) $(8) $(329)
Return on Average Common Equity (percent)(a)(b)
15.83
 (120.43) (1.87) (0.34) (15.43)
Total Assets (in millions)(c)
$4,886
 $4,866
 $8,235
 $7,840
 $6,642
Gross Property Additions (in millions)$206
 $536
 $946
 $972
 $1,389
Capitalization (in millions):         
Common stockholder's equity$1,609
 $1,358
 $2,943
 $2,359
 $2,084
Redeemable preferred stock
 33
 33
 33
 33
Long-term debt(c)
1,539
 1,097
 2,424
 1,886
 1,621
Total (excluding amounts due within one year)$3,148
 $2,488
 $5,400
 $4,278
 $3,738
Capitalization Ratios (percent):         
Common stockholder's equity51.1
 54.6
 54.5
 55.1
 55.8
Redeemable preferred stock
 1.3
 0.6
 0.8
 0.9
Long-term debt(c)
48.9
 44.1
 44.9
 44.1
 43.3
Total (excluding amounts due within one year)100.0
 100.0
 100.0
 100.0
 100.0
Customers (year-end):         
Residential153,423
 153,115
 153,172
 153,158
 152,453
Commercial33,968
 33,992
 33,783
 33,663
 33,496
Industrial445
 452
 451
 467
 482
Other188
 173
 175
 175
 175
Total188,024
 187,732
 187,581
 187,463
 186,606
Employees (year-end)1,053
 1,242
 1,484
 1,478
 1,478
(a)As a result of the Tax Reform Legislation, Mississippi Power recorded an income tax expense (benefit) of $(35) million and $372 million in 2018 and 2017, respectively.
(b)A significant loss to income was recorded by Mississippi Power related to the suspension of the Kemper IGCC in June 2017. Earnings in all periods presented were impacted by losses related to the Kemper IGCC.
(c)A reclassification of debt issuance costs from Total Assets to Long-term debt of $9 million and a reclassification of deferred tax assets from Total Assets to Accumulated deferred income taxes of $105 million is reflected for 2014, in accordance with new accounting standards adopted in 2015 and applied retrospectively.


SELECTED FINANCIAL AND OPERATING DATA 2014-2018 (continued)
Mississippi Power Company 2018 Annual Report
 2018
 2017
 2016
 2015
 2014
Operating Revenues (in millions):         
Residential$273
 $257
 $260
 $238
 $239
Commercial286
 285
 279
 256
 257
Industrial321
 321
 313
 287
 291
Other9
 (9) 7
 (5) 8
Total retail889
 854
 859
 776
 795
Wholesale — non-affiliates263
 259
 261
 270
 323
Wholesale — affiliates91
 56
 26
 76
 107
Total revenues from sales of electricity1,243
 1,169
 1,146
 1,122
 1,225
Other revenues22
 18
 17
 16
 18
Total$1,265
 $1,187
 $1,163
 $1,138
 $1,243
Kilowatt-Hour Sales (in millions):         
Residential2,113
 1,944
 2,051
 2,025
 2,126
Commercial2,797
 2,764
 2,842
 2,806
 2,860
Industrial4,924
 4,841
 4,906
 4,958
 4,943
Other37
 39
 39
 40
 40
Total retail9,871
 9,588
 9,838
 9,829
 9,969
Wholesale — non-affiliates3,980
 3,672
 3,920
 3,852
 4,191
Wholesale — affiliates2,584
 2,024
 1,108
 2,807
 2,900
Total16,435
 15,284
 14,866
 16,488
 17,060
Average Revenue Per Kilowatt-Hour (cents):         
Residential12.92
 13.22
 12.68
 11.75
 11.26
Commercial10.23
 10.31
 9.82
 9.12
 8.99
Industrial6.52
 6.63
 6.38
 5.79
 5.89
Total retail9.01
 8.91
 8.73
 7.90
 7.97
Wholesale5.39
 5.53
 5.71
 5.20
 6.06
Total sales7.56
 7.65
 7.71
 6.80
 7.18
Residential Average Annual
Kilowatt-Hour Use Per Customer
13,768
 12,692
 13,383
 13,242
 13,934
Residential Average Annual
Revenue Per Customer
$1,780
 $1,680
 $1,697
 $1,556
 $1,568
Plant Nameplate Capacity
Ratings (year-end) (megawatts)
3,516
 3,628
 3,481
 3,561
 3,867
Maximum Peak-Hour Demand (megawatts):         
Winter2,763
 2,390
 2,195
 2,548
 2,618
Summer2,346
 2,322
 2,384
 2,403
 2,345
Annual Load Factor (percent)55.8
 63.1
 64.0
 60.6
 59.4
Plant Availability Fossil-Steam (percent)82.4
 89.1
 91.4
 90.6
 87.6
Source of Energy Supply (percent):         
Gas86.1
 88.0
 84.9
 81.6
 55.3
Coal6.9
 7.5
 8.0
 16.5
 39.7
Purchased power —         
From non-affiliates4.7
 0.5
 (0.3) 0.4
 1.4
From affiliates2.3
 4.0
 7.4
 1.5
 3.6
Total100.0
 100.0
 100.0
 100.0
 100.0


SELECTED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL AND OPERATING DATA 2014-2018
Southern Power Company and Subsidiary Companies 2018 Annual Report
 2018
 2017
 2016
 2015
 2014
Operating Revenues (in millions):         
Wholesale — non-affiliates$1,757
 $1,671
 $1,146
 $964
 $1,116
Wholesale — affiliates435
 392
 419
 417
 383
Total revenues from sales of electricity2,192
 2,063
 1,565
 1,381
 1,499
Other revenues13
 12
 12
 9
 2
Total$2,205
 $2,075
 $1,577
 $1,390
 $1,501
Net Income Attributable to
   Southern Power (in millions)(a)
$187
 $1,071
 $338
 $215
 $172
Cash Dividends
   on Common Stock (in millions)
$312
 $317
 $272
 $131
 $131
Return on Average Common Equity (percent)(a)
4.62
 22.39
 9.79
 10.16
 10.39
Total Assets (in millions)(b)
$14,883
 $15,206
 $15,169
 $8,905
 $5,233
Property, Plant, and Equipment
   In Service (in millions)
$13,271
 $13,755
 $12,728
 $7,275
 $5,657
Capitalization (in millions):         
Common stockholders' equity$2,968
 $5,138
 $4,430
 $2,483
 $1,752
Noncontrolling interests4,316
 1,360
 1,245
 781
 219
Redeemable noncontrolling interests
 
 164
 43
 39
Long-term debt(b)
4,418
 5,071
 5,068
 2,719
 1,085
Total (excluding amounts due within one year)$11,702
 $11,569
 $10,907
 $6,026
 $3,095
Capitalization Ratios (percent):         
Common stockholders' equity25.4
 44.4
 40.6
 41.2
 56.6
Noncontrolling interests36.9
 11.8
 11.4
 13.0
 7.1
Redeemable noncontrolling interests
 
 1.5
 0.7
 1.3
Long-term debt(b)
37.7
 43.8
 46.5
 45.1
 35.0
Total (excluding amounts due within one year)100.0
 100.0
 100.0
 100.0
 100.0
Kilowatt-Hour Sales (in millions):         
Wholesale — non-affiliates37,164
 35,920
 23,213
 18,544
 19,014
Wholesale — affiliates12,603
 12,811
 15,950
 16,567
 11,194
Total49,767
 48,731
 39,163
 35,111
 30,208
Plant Nameplate Capacity
   Ratings (year-end) (megawatts)
11,888
 12,940
 12,442
 9,808
 9,185
Maximum Peak-Hour Demand (megawatts):         
Winter2,867
 3,421
 3,469
 3,923
 3,999
Summer4,210
 4,224
 4,303
 4,249
 3,998
Annual Load Factor (percent)52.2
 49.1
 50.0
 49.0
 51.8
Plant Availability (percent)99.9
 99.9
 91.6
 93.1
 91.8
Source of Energy Supply (percent):         
Natural gas68.1
 67.7
 79.4
 89.5
 86.0
Solar, Wind, and Biomass23.6
 22.8
 12.1
 4.3
 2.9
Purchased power —         
From non-affiliates6.6
 7.8
 6.8
 4.7
 6.4
From affiliates1.7
 1.7
 1.7
 1.5
 4.7
Total100.0
 100.0
 100.0
 100.0
 100.0
Employees (year-end)(c)
491
 541
 
 
 
(a)As a result of the Tax Reform Legislation, Southern Power recorded an income tax expense (benefit) of $79 million and $(743) million in 2018 and 2017, respectively.
(b)A reclassification of debt issuance costs from Total Assets to Long-term debt of $11 million and a reclassification of deferred tax assets from Total Assets to Accumulated deferred income taxes of $306 million is reflected for 2014, in accordance with new accounting standards adopted in 2015 and applied retrospectively.
(c)Prior to December 2017, Southern Power had no employees but was billed for employee-related costs from SCS.

SELECTED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL AND OPERATING DATA 2014-2018
Southern Company Gas and Subsidiary Companies 2018 Annual Report
 
Successor(a)
  
Predecessor(a)
 
2018(b)
 2017 July 1, 2016 through December 31, 2016  January 1, 2016 through June 30, 2016 2015 2014
Operating Revenues (in millions)$3,909
 $3,920
 $1,652
  $1,905
 $3,941
 $5,385
Net Income Attributable to
Southern Company Gas
(in millions)
(c)
$372
 $243
 $114
  $131
 $353
 $482
Cash Dividends on Common Stock
(in millions)
$468
 $443
 $126
  $128
 $244
 $233
Return on Average Common Equity
(percent)
(c)
4.23
 2.68
 1.74
  3.31
 9.05
 12.96
Total Assets (in millions)$21,448
 $22,987
 $21,853
  $14,488
 $14,754
 $14,888
Gross Property Additions
(in millions)
$1,399
 $1,525
 $632
  $548
 $1,027
 $769
Capitalization (in millions):            
Common stockholders' equity$8,570
 $9,022
 $9,109
  $3,933
 $3,975
 $3,828
Long-term debt5,583
 5,891
 5,259
  3,709
 3,275
 3,581
Total (excluding amounts due within
one year)
$14,153
 $14,913
 $14,368
  $7,642
 $7,250
 $7,409
Capitalization Ratios (percent):            
Common stockholders' equity60.6
 60.5
 63.4
  51.5
 54.8
 51.7
Long-term debt39.4
 39.5
 36.6
  48.5
 45.2
 48.3
Total (excluding amounts due within
one year)
100.0
 100.0
 100.0
  100.0
 100.0
 100.0
Service Contracts (period-end)
 1,184,257
 1,198,263
  1,197,096
 1,205,476
 1,162,065
Customers (period-end)            
Gas distribution operations4,247,804
 4,623,249
 4,586,477
  4,544,489
 4,557,729
 4,529,114
Gas marketing services697,384
 773,984
 655,999
  630,475
 654,475
 633,460
Total4,945,188
 5,397,233
 5,242,476
  5,174,964
 5,212,204
 5,162,574
Employees (period-end)4,389
 5,318
 5,292
  5,284
 5,203
 5,165
(a)As a result of the Merger, pushdown accounting was applied to create a new cost basis for Southern Company Gas' assets, liabilities, and equity as of the acquisition date. Accordingly, the successor financial statements reflect the new basis of accounting, and successor and predecessor period financial results are presented but are not comparable.
(b)During 2018, Southern Company Gas completed the Southern Company Gas Dispositions. See Note 15 to the financial statements under "Southern Company Gas" in Item 8 herein for additional information.
(c)
As a result of the Tax Reform Legislation, Southern Company Gas recorded income tax expense (benefit) of $(3) million and $93 million in 2018 and 2017, respectively.


SELECTED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL AND OPERATING DATA 2014-2018 (continued)
Southern Company Gas and Subsidiary Companies 2018 Annual Report
 
Successor(a)
  
Predecessor(a)
 
2018(b)
 2017 July 1, 2016 through December 31, 2016  January 1, 2016 through June 30, 2016 2015 2014
Operating Revenues (in millions)            
Residential$1,886
 $2,100
 $899
  $1,101
 $2,129
 $2,877
Commercial546
 641
 260
  310
 617
 861
Transportation944
 811
 269
  290
 526
 458
Industrial140
 159
 74
  72
 203
 242
Other393
 209
 150
  132
 466
 947
Total$3,909
 $3,920
 $1,652
  $1,905
 $3,941
 $5,385
Heating Degree Days:            
Illinois6,101
 5,246
 1,903
  3,340
 5,433
 6,556
Georgia2,588
 1,970
 727
  1,448
 2,204
 2,882
Gas Sales Volumes
(mmBtu in millions):
            
Gas distribution operations            
Firm721
 667
 274
  396
 695
 766
Interruptible95
 95
 47
  49
 99
 106
Total816
 762
 321
  445
 794
 872
Gas marketing services            
Firm:            
Georgia37
 32
 13
  21
 35
 41
Illinois13
 12
 4
  8
 13
 17
Other20
 18
 5
  7
 11
 10
Interruptible large commercial and
industrial
14
 14
 6
  8
 14
 17
Total84
 76
 28
  44
 73
 85
Market share in Georgia (percent)29.0
 29.2
 29.4
  29.3
 29.7
 30.6
Wholesale gas services            
Daily physical sales (mmBtu in
millions/day
)
6.7
 6.4
 7.2
  7.6
 6.8
 6.3
(a)As a result of the Merger, pushdown accounting was applied to create a new cost basis for Southern Company Gas' assets, liabilities, and equity as of the acquisition date. Accordingly, the successor financial statements reflect the new basis of accounting, and successor and predecessor period financial results are presented but are not comparable.
(b)During 2018, Southern Company Gas completed the Southern Company Gas Dispositions. See Note 15 to the financial statements under "Southern Company Gas" in Item 8 herein for additional information.


Item 7.MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
 Page
Item 7A.QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK
See MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS – FINANCIAL CONDITION AND LIQUIDITY – "Market Price Risk" of each of the registrants in Item 7 herein and Note 1 of each of the registrant's financial statements under "Financial Instruments" in Item 8 herein. See also Notes 10 and 11 to the financial statements of Southern Company, Alabama Power, and Georgia Power, Notes 9 and 10 to the financial statements of Gulf Power, Mississippi Power, and Southern Company Gas, and Notes 8 and 9 to the financial statements of Southern Power in Item 8 herein.

Item 8.FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA
INDEX TO 2017 FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Page

Page
    Table of Contents                                Index to Financial Statements

Item 9.CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE
None.
Item 9A.CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES
Disclosure Controls and Procedures.
As of the end of the period covered by this Annual Report on Form 10-K, Southern Company, Alabama Power, Georgia Power, Gulf Power, Mississippi Power, Southern Power, and Southern Company Gas conducted separate evaluations under the supervision and with the participation of each company's management, including the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, of the effectiveness of the design and operation of the disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended). Based upon these evaluations, the Chief Executive Officer and the Chief Financial Officer, in each case, concluded that the disclosure controls and procedures are effective.
Internal Control Over Financial Reporting.
(a) Management's Annual Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting.
Management's Report on Internal Control Over Financial ReportingPage
(b) Attestation Report of the Registered Public Accounting Firm.
The report of Deloitte & Touche LLP, Southern Company's independent registered public accounting firm, regarding Southern Company's Internal Control over Financial Reporting is included on page II-9 of this Form 10-K. This report is not applicable to Alabama Power, Georgia Power, Gulf Power, Mississippi Power, Southern Power, and Southern Company Gas as these companies are not accelerated filers or large accelerated filers.
(c) Changes in internal control over financial reporting.
There have been no changes in Southern Company's, Alabama Power's, Georgia Power's, Gulf Power's, Mississippi Power's, Southern Power's, or Southern Company Gas' internal control over financial reporting (as such term is defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended) during the fourth quarter 2017 that have materially affected or are reasonably likely to materially affect Southern Company's, Alabama Power's, Georgia Power's, Gulf Power's, Mississippi Power's, Southern Power's, or Southern Company Gas' internal control over financial reporting.
Item 9B.OTHER INFORMATION
None.

THE SOUTHERN COMPANY
AND SUBSIDIARY COMPANIES
FINANCIAL SECTION


MANAGEMENT'S REPORT ON INTERNAL CONTROL OVER FINANCIAL REPORTING
Southern Company and Subsidiary Companies 2017 Annual Report
The management of The Southern Company (Southern Company) is responsible for establishing and maintaining an adequate system of internal control over financial reporting as required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and as defined in Exchange Act Rule 13a-15(f). A control system can provide only reasonable, not absolute, assurance that the objectives of the control system are met.
Under management's supervision, an evaluation of the design and effectiveness of Southern Company's internal control over financial reporting was conducted based on the framework in Internal Control—Integrated Framework(2013) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission. Based on this evaluation, management concluded that Southern Company's internal control over financial reporting was effective as of December 31, 2017.
Deloitte & Touche LLP, as auditors of Southern Company's financial statements, has issued an attestation report on the effectiveness of Southern Company's internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2017, which is included herein.

/s/ Thomas A. Fanning
Thomas A. Fanning
Chairman, President, and Chief Executive Officer

/s/ Art P. Beattie
Art P. Beattie
Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
February 20, 2018


REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
To the stockholders and the Board of Directors of The Southern Company and Subsidiary Companies
Opinions on the Financial Statements and Internal Control over Financial Reporting
We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets and consolidated statements of capitalization of The Southern Company and Subsidiary Companies (the Company) as of December 31, 2017 and 2016, the related consolidated statements of income, comprehensive income, stockholders' equity, and cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2017, and the related notes (collectively referred to as the "financial statements"). We also have audited the Company's internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2017, based on criteria established in Internal Control - Integrated Framework (2013) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO).
In our opinion, the financial statements (pages II-64 to II-151) referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of the Company as of December 31, 2017 and 2016, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2017, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. Also, in our opinion, the Company maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2017, based on criteria established in Internal Control – Integrated Framework (2013) issued by COSO.
Basis for Opinions
The Company's management is responsible for these financial statements, for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting, and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, included in the accompanying Management's Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting (page II-8). Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements and an opinion on the Company's internal control over financial reporting based on our audits. We are a public accounting firm registered with the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (PCAOB) and are required to be independent with respect to the Company in accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.
We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audits to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement, whether due to error or fraud, and whether effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material respects.
Our audits of the consolidated financial statements included performing procedures to assess the risks of material misstatement of the financial statements, whether due to error or fraud, and performing procedures to respond to those risks. Such procedures included examining, on a test basis, evidence regarding the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. Our audits also included evaluating the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the financial statements. Our audit of internal control over financial reporting included obtaining an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, assessing the risk that a material weakness exists, and testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control based on the assessed risk. Our audits also included performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinions.
Definition and Limitations of Internal Control over Financial Reporting
A company's internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A company's internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (1) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company; and (3) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the company's assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.
Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.
/s/ Deloitte & Touche LLP
Atlanta, Georgia
February 20, 2018
We have served as the Company's auditor since 2002.

DEFINITIONS
TermMeaning
2012 MPSC CPCN OrderA detailed order issued by the Mississippi PSC in April 2012 confirming the CPCN originally approved by the Mississippi PSC in 2010 authorizing acquisition, construction, and operation of Mississippi Power's Kemper County energy facility
2013 ARPAlternative Rate Plan approved by the Georgia PSC in 2013 for Georgia Power for the years 2014 through 2016 and subsequently extended through 2019
AFUDCAllowance for funds used during construction
Alabama PowerAlabama Power Company
AROAsset retirement obligation
ASCAccounting Standards Codification
ASUAccounting Standards Update
Atlanta Gas LightAtlanta Gas Light Company, a wholly-owned subsidiary of Southern Company Gas
Atlantic Coast PipelineAtlantic Coast Pipeline, LLC, a joint venture to construct and operate a natural gas pipeline in which Southern Company Gas has a 5% ownership interest
Bechtel                                                                Bechtel Power Corporation
CCRCoal combustion residuals
Clean Air ActClean Air Act Amendments of 1990
CO2
Carbon dioxide
CODCommercial operation date
Contractor Settlement AgreementThe December 31, 2015 agreement between Westinghouse and the Vogtle Owners resolving disputes between the Vogtle Owners and the EPC Contractor under the Vogtle 3 and 4 Agreement
Cooperative EnergyElectric cooperative in Mississippi
CPCNCertificate of public convenience and necessity
CWIPConstruction work in progress
Dalton PipelineA pipeline facility in Georgia in which Southern Company Gas has a 50% undivided ownership interest
DOEU.S. Department of Energy
Eligible Project CostsCertain costs of construction relating to Plant Vogtle Units 3 and 4 that are eligible for financing under the loan guarantee program established under Title XVII of the Energy Policy Act of 2005
EPAU.S. Environmental Protection Agency
EPC ContractorWestinghouse and its affiliate, WECTEC Global Project Services Inc.; the former engineering, procurement, and construction contractor for Plant Vogtle Units 3 and 4
FASBFinancial Accounting Standards Board
FERCFederal Energy Regulatory Commission
FFBFederal Financing Bank
GAAPU.S. generally accepted accounting principles
Georgia PowerGeorgia Power Company
Gulf PowerGulf Power Company
IGCCIntegrated coal gasification combined cycle, the technology originally approved for Mississippi Power's Kemper County energy facility (Plant Ratcliffe)
Interim Assessment AgreementAgreement entered into by the Vogtle Owners and the EPC Contractor to allow construction to continue after the EPC Contractor's bankruptcy filing
IRSInternal Revenue Service
ITCInvestment tax credit
KWHKilowatt-hour
LIBORLondon Interbank Offered Rate

DEFINITIONS
(continued)
TermMeaning
LIFOLast-in, first-out
Loan Guarantee AgreementLoan guarantee agreement entered into by Georgia Power with the DOE in 2014, under which the proceeds of borrowings may be used to reimburse Georgia Power for Eligible Project Costs incurred in connection with its construction of Plant Vogtle Units 3 and 4
LTSALong-term service agreement
MergerThe merger, effective July 1, 2016, of a wholly-owned, direct subsidiary of Southern Company with and into Southern Company Gas, with Southern Company Gas continuing as the surviving corporation
Mirror CWIPA regulatory liability used by Mississippi Power to record financing costs associated with construction of the Kemper County energy facility, which were subsequently refunded to customers
Mississippi PowerMississippi Power Company
mmBtuMillion British thermal units
Moody'sMoody's Investors Service, Inc.
MPUSMississippi Public Utilities Staff
MWMegawatt
natural gas distribution utilitiesSouthern Company Gas' seven natural gas distribution utilities (Nicor Gas, Atlanta Gas Light, Virginia Natural Gas, Inc., Elizabethtown Gas, Florida City Gas, Chattanooga Gas Company, and Elkton Gas)
NCCRGeorgia Power's Nuclear Construction Cost Recovery
NDRAlabama Power's Natural Disaster Reserve
New Jersey BPUNew Jersey Board of Public Utilities, the state regulatory agency for Elizabethtown Gas
Nicor GasNorthern Illinois Gas Company, a wholly-owned subsidiary of Southern Company Gas
NOX
Nitrogen oxide
NRCU.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission
OCIOther comprehensive income
PennEast PipelinePennEast Pipeline Company, LLC, a joint venture to construct and operate a natural gas pipeline in which Southern Company Gas has a 20% ownership interest
PowerSecurePowerSecure, Inc.
power poolThe operating arrangement whereby the integrated generating resources of the traditional electric operating companies and Southern Power (excluding subsidiaries) are subject to joint commitment and dispatch in order to serve their combined load obligations
PPAPower purchase agreements, as well as, for Southern Power, contracts for differences that provide the owner of a renewable facility a certain fixed price for the electricity sold to the grid
PSCPublic Service Commission
PTCProduction tax credit
Rate CNPAlabama Power's Rate Certificated New Plant
Rate CNP ComplianceAlabama Power's Rate Certificated New Plant Compliance
Rate CNP PPAAlabama Power's Rate Certificated New Plant Power Purchase Agreement
Rate ECRAlabama Power's Rate Energy Cost Recovery
Rate NDRAlabama Power's Rate Natural Disaster Reserve
Rate RSEAlabama Power's Rate Stabilization and Equalization plan
ROEReturn on equity
S&PS&P Global Ratings, a division of S&P Global Inc.
SCSSouthern Company Services, Inc. (the Southern Company system service company)
SECU.S. Securities and Exchange Commission
SEGCOSouthern Electric Generating Company

DEFINITIONS
(continued)
TermMeaning
SO2
Sulfur dioxide
Southern Company GasSouthern Company Gas and its subsidiaries
Southern Company Gas CapitalSouthern Company Gas Capital Corporation, a 100%-owned subsidiary of Southern Company Gas
Southern Company systemThe Southern Company, the traditional electric operating companies, Southern Power, Southern Company Gas (as of July 1, 2016), SEGCO, Southern Nuclear, SCS, Southern Linc, PowerSecure (as of May 9, 2016), and other subsidiaries
Southern LincSouthern Communications Services, Inc.
Southern NuclearSouthern Nuclear Operating Company, Inc.
Southern PowerSouthern Power Company and its subsidiaries
Tax Reform LegislationThe Tax Cuts and Jobs Act, which was signed into law on December 22, 2017 and became effective on January 1, 2018
ToshibaToshiba Corporation, parent company of Westinghouse
Toshiba GuaranteeCertain payment obligations of the EPC Contractor guaranteed by Toshiba
traditional electric operating companiesAlabama Power, Georgia Power, Gulf Power, and Mississippi Power
VCMVogtle Construction Monitoring
Vogtle 3 and 4 AgreementAgreement entered into with the EPC Contractor in 2008 by Georgia Power, acting for itself and as agent for the Vogtle Owners, pursuant to which the EPC Contractor agreed to design, engineer, procure, construct, and test Plant Vogtle Units 3 and 4
Vogtle OwnersGeorgia Power, Oglethorpe Power Corporation, the Municipal Electric Authority of Georgia, and the City of Dalton, Georgia, an incorporated municipality in the State of Georgia acting by and through its Board of Water, Light, and Sinking Fund Commissioners
Vogtle Services AgreementThe June 9, 2017 services agreement between the Vogtle Owners and the EPC Contractor, as amended and restated on July 20, 2017, for the EPC Contractor to transition construction management of Plant Vogtle Units 3 and 4 to Southern Nuclear and to provide ongoing design, engineering, and procurement services to Southern Nuclear
WestinghouseWestinghouse Electric Company LLC

MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
Southern Company and Subsidiary Companies 20172018 Annual Report



OVERVIEW
Business Activities
The Southern Company (Southern Company or the Company) is a holding company that owns all of the common stock of the traditional electric operating companies and the parent entities of Southern Power and Southern Company Gas and owns other direct and indirect subsidiaries. The primary businesses of the Southern Company system are electricity sales by the traditional electric operating companies and Southern Power and the distribution of natural gas by Southern Company Gas.
The four traditional electric operating companies are vertically integrated utilities providing electric service in fourthree Southeastern states. states as of January 1, 2019. On January 1, 2019, Southern Company completed its sale of Gulf Power to NextEra Energy for an aggregate cash purchase price of approximately $5.8 billion (less $1.3 billion of indebtedness assumed), subject to customary working capital adjustments. At December 31, 2018, the assets and liabilities of Gulf Power were classified as held for sale on Southern Company's balance sheet. Unless otherwise noted, the disclosures herein related to specific asset and liability balances at December 31, 2018 exclude assets and liabilities held for sale. See Note 15 under "Assets Held for Sale" for additional information. A preliminary gain of $2.5 billion pre-tax ($1.3 billion after tax) associated with the sale of Gulf Power is expected to be recorded in 2019.
Southern Power develops, constructs, acquires, owns, and manages power generation assets, including renewable energy projects, and sells electricity at market-based rates in the wholesale market. On May 22, 2018, Southern Power sold a noncontrolling 33% equity interest in SP Solar, a limited partnership indirectly owning substantially all of Southern Power's solar facilities, for approximately $1.2 billion and, on December 11, 2018, Southern Power sold a noncontrolling tax equity interest in SP Wind, a holding company owning a portfolio of eight operating wind facilities, for approximately $1.2 billion. On November 5, 2018, Southern Power entered into an agreement to sell all of its equity interests in Plant Mankato (including the 385-MW expansion currently under construction) for an aggregate purchase price of approximately $650 million, which is expected to close mid-2019. The ultimate outcome of this matter cannot be determined at this time.
Southern Company Gas distributes natural gas through its natural gas distribution utilities in seven states and is involved in several other complementary businesses including gas marketing services,pipeline investments, wholesale gas services, and gas midstream operations. marketing services. In July 2018, Southern Company Gas completed sales of three of its natural gas distribution utilities.
See FUTURE EARNINGS POTENTIAL – "General" herein and Note 15 to the financial statements for additional information regarding agreements entered into by a wholly-owned subsidiary of Southern Company Gas to sell two of its natural gas distribution utilities.disposition activities.
Many factors affect the opportunities, challenges, and risks of the Southern Company system's electricity and natural gas businesses. These factors include the ability to maintain constructive regulatory environments, to maintain and grow sales and customers, and to effectively manage and secure timely recovery of costs. These costs include those related to projected long-term demand growth, stringent environmental standards, including CCR rules, reliability, fuel, restoration following major storms, and capital expenditures, including constructing new electric generating plants, expanding and improving the electric transmission and distribution systems, and updating and expanding the natural gas distribution systems.
The traditional electric operating companies and natural gas distribution utilities have various regulatory mechanisms that operate to address cost recovery. Effectively operating pursuant to these regulatory mechanisms and appropriately balancing required costs and capital expenditures with customer prices will continue to challenge the Southern Company system for the foreseeable future. See Note 32 to the financial statements under "Regulatory Matters" for additional information.
In 2018, Alabama Power, Georgia Power, Mississippi Power, Atlanta Gas Light, and Nicor Gas reached agreements with their respective state PSCs or other applicable state regulatory agencies relating to the regulatory impacts of the Tax Reform Legislation, which, for some companies, included capital structure adjustments expected to help mitigate the potential adverse impacts to certain of their credit metrics. See Note 2 to the financial statements for additional information regarding state PSC or other regulatory agency actions related to the Tax Reform Legislation. Also see MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS – FUTURE EARNINGS POTENTIAL – "Income Tax Matters" and FINANCIAL CONDITION AND LIQUIDITY – "Credit Rating Risk" herein and Note 10 to the financial statements for information regarding the Tax Reform Legislation.
Another major factor affecting the Southern Company system's businesses is the profitability of the competitive market-based wholesale generating business. Southern Power's strategy is to create value through various transactions including acquisitions, dispositions, and sales of assets,partnership interests, development and construction of new generating facilities, and entry into PPAs primarily with investor-owned utilities, independent power producers,IPPs, municipalities, electric cooperatives, and other load-serving entities, as well as commercial and industrial customers. In general, Southern Power has committedcommits to the construction or acquisition of new generating capacity only after entering into or assuming long-term PPAs for the new facilities.
Table of ContentsIndex to Financial Statements

MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS (continued)
Southern Power is also currently pursuing the sale of a portion of equity interests in its solar assets. See FUTURE EARNINGS POTENTIAL – "General" herein for additional information.Company and Subsidiary Companies 2018 Annual Report


Southern Company's other business activities include providing energy technologies and services to electric utilities and large industrial, commercial, institutional, and municipal customers. Customer solutions, includeincluding distributed generation systems, utilityenergy infrastructure, solutions, and energy efficiency products and services.services, and utility infrastructure services, to customers. Other business activities also include investments in telecommunications, leveraged lease projects, and gas storage facilities. Management continues to evaluate the contribution of each of these activities to total shareholder return and may pursue acquisitions, dispositions, and other strategic ventures or investments accordingly.
In striving to achieve attractive risk-adjusted returns while providing cost-effective energy to more than nineeight million electric and gas utility customers, the Southern Company system continues to focus on several key performance indicators. These indicators include, but are not limited to, customer satisfaction, plant availability, electric and natural gas system reliability, execution of major construction projects, and earnings per share (EPS). Southern Company's financial success is directly tied to customer satisfaction. Key elements of ensuring customer satisfaction include outstanding service, high reliability, and competitive prices. Management uses customer satisfaction surveys and reliability indicators to evaluate the results of the Southern Company system.
See RESULTS OF OPERATIONS herein for information on theSouthern Company's financial performance.
Kemper County Energy FacilityPlant Vogtle Units 3 and 4 Status
In 2009, the Georgia PSC certified construction of Plant Vogtle Units 3 and 4 (with electric generating capacity of approximately 1,100 MWs each). Georgia Power holds a 45.7% ownership interest in Plant Vogtle Units 3 and 4. In March 2017, the EPC Contractor filed for bankruptcy protection under Chapter 11 of the U.S. Bankruptcy Code. In December 2017, the Georgia PSC approved Georgia Power's recommendation to continue construction. The Kemper County energy facilitycurrent expected in-service dates remain November 2021 for Unit 3 and November 2022 for Unit 4.
In the second quarter 2018, Georgia Power revised its base capital cost forecast and estimated contingency to complete construction and start-up of Plant Vogtle Units 3 and 4 to $8.0 billion and $0.4 billion, respectively, for a total project capital cost forecast of $8.4 billion (net of $1.7 billion received under the Guarantee Settlement Agreement and approximately $188 million in related Customer Refunds), with respect to Georgia Power's ownership interest. Although Georgia Power believes these incremental costs are reasonable and necessary to complete the project and the Georgia PSC's order in the seventeenth VCM proceeding specifically states that the construction of Plant Vogtle Units 3 and 4 is not subject to a cost cap, Georgia Power did not seek rate recovery for the $0.7 billion increase in costs included in the current base capital cost forecast (or any related financing costs) in the nineteenth VCM report that was approved by the MississippiGeorgia PSC as an IGCC facilityon February 19, 2019. In connection with future VCM filings, Georgia Power may request the Georgia PSC to evaluate costs currently included in the 2010 CPCN proceedings,construction contingency estimate for rate recovery as and when they are appropriately included in the base capital cost forecast. After considering the significant level of uncertainty that exists regarding the future recoverability of costs included in the construction contingency estimate since the ultimate outcome of these matters is subject to the outcome of future assessments by management, as well as Georgia PSC decisions in these future regulatory proceedings, Georgia Power recorded a total pre-tax charge to income of $1.1 billion ($0.8 billion after tax) in the second quarter 2018.
As a result of the increase in the total project capital cost forecast and Georgia Power's decision not to seek rate recovery of the increase in the base capital costs, the holders of at least 90% of the ownership interests in Plant Vogtle Units 3 and 4 were required to vote to continue construction. On September 26, 2018, the Vogtle Owners unanimously voted to continue construction cost cap of $2.88Plant Vogtle Units 3 and 4. In connection with the vote to continue construction, Georgia Power entered into (i) a binding term sheet (Vogtle Owner Term Sheet) with the other Vogtle Owners and certain of MEAG's wholly-owned subsidiaries, including MEAG Power SPVJ, LLC (MEAG SPVJ), to take certain actions which partially mitigate potential financial exposure for the other Vogtle Owners and (ii) a term sheet (MEAG Term Sheet) with MEAG and MEAG SPVJ to provide funding with respect to MEAG SPVJ's ownership interest in Plant Vogtle Units 3 and 4 under certain circumstances. On January 14, 2019, Georgia Power, MEAG, and MEAG SPVJ entered into an agreement to implement the provisions of the MEAG Term Sheet. On February 18, 2019, Georgia Power, the other Vogtle Owners, and certain of MEAG's wholly-owned subsidiaries entered into certain amendments to their joint ownership agreements to implement the provisions of the Vogtle Owner Term Sheet.
The ultimate outcome of these matters cannot be determined at this time.
See FUTURE EARNINGS POTENTIAL – "Construction ProgramNuclear Construction" herein for additional information on Plant Vogtle Units 3 and 4.
Earnings
Consolidated net income attributable to Southern Company was $2.2 billion netin 2018, an increase of $245 million$1.4 billion, or 164.4%, from the prior year. The increase was primarily due to charges of grants awarded$3.4 billion ($2.4 billion after tax) in 2017 related to the projectKemper IGCC at Mississippi Power, partially offset by a $1.1 billion ($0.8 billion after tax) charge in the DOE under the Clean Coal Power Initiative Round 2 (Initial DOE Grants) and excluding the cost of the lignite mine and equipment, the cost ofsecond quarter 2018 for an
    Table of Contents                                Index to Financial Statements        

MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS (continued)
Southern Company and Subsidiary Companies 20172018 Annual Report


the CO2 pipeline facilities, AFUDC, and certain general exceptions (Cost Cap Exceptions). The combined cycle and associated common facilities portions of the Kemper County energy facility were placed in service in August 2014. In December 2015, the Mississippi PSC issued an order (In-Service Asset Rate Order), authorizing rates that provided for the recovery of approximately $126 million annually related to the assets previously placed in service.
On June 21, 2017, the Mississippi PSC stated its intent to issue an order (which occurredestimated probable loss on July 6, 2017) directing Mississippi Power to pursue a settlement under which the Kemper County energy facility would be operated as a natural gas plant, rather than an IGCC plant, and address all issues associated with the Kemper County energy facility (Kemper Settlement Order). The Kemper Settlement Order established a new docket for the purposes of pursuing a global settlement of the related costs (Kemper Settlement Docket).
On June 28, 2017, Mississippi Power notified the Mississippi PSC that it would begin a process to suspend operations and start-up activities on the gasifier portion of the Kemper County energy facility, given the uncertainty as to its future. At the time of project suspension, the total cost estimate for the Kemper County energy facility was approximately $7.38 billion, including approximately $5.95 billion of costs subject to the construction cost cap, and was net of the $137 million in additional grants from the DOE received on April 8, 2016 (Additional DOE Grants). In the aggregate, Mississippi Power had incurred charges of $3.07 billion ($1.89 billion after tax) as a result of changes in the cost estimate above the cost cap for the Kemper IGCC through May 31, 2017. Given the Mississippi PSC's stated intent regarding no further rate increase for the Kemper County energy facility and the subsequent suspension, cost recovery of the gasifier portions became no longer probable; therefore, Mississippi Power recorded an additional charge to income in June 2017 of $2.8 billion ($2.0 billion after tax), which included estimated costs associated with the gasifier portions of the plant and lignite mine.
On February 6, 2018, the Mississippi PSC voted to approve a settlement agreement related to cost recovery for the Kemper County energy facility among Mississippi Power, the MPUS, and certain intervenors (Kemper Settlement Agreement). The Kemper Settlement Agreement provides for an annual revenue requirement of approximately $99.3 million for costs related to the Kemper County energy facility, which includes the impact of Tax Reform Legislation. The revenue requirement is based on (i) a fixed ROE for 2018 of 8.6%, excluding any performance adjustment, (ii) a ROE for 2019 calculated in accordance with MississippiGeorgia Power's Performance Evaluation Plan (PEP), excluding the performance adjustment, (iii) for future years, a performance-based ROE calculated pursuant to PEP, and (iv) amortization periods for the related regulatory assets and liabilities of eight years and six years, respectively. The revenue requirement also reflects a disallowance related to a portion of Mississippi Power's investment in the Kemper County energy facility requested for inclusion in rate base, which was recorded in the fourth quarter 2017 as an additional charge to income of approximately $78 million ($85 million net of accumulated depreciation of $7 million) pre-tax ($48 million after tax).
Under the Kemper Settlement Agreement, retail customer rates will reflect a reduction of approximately $26.8 million annually and include no recovery for costs associated with the gasifier portion of the Kemper County energy facility in 2018 or at any future date. On February 12, 2018, Mississippi Power made the required compliance filing with the Mississippi PSC. The Kemper Settlement Agreement also requires (i) the CPCN for the Kemper County energy facility to be modified to limit it to natural gas combined cycle operation and (ii) Mississippi Power to file a reserve margin plan with the Mississippi PSC by August 2018.
During the third and fourth quarters of 2017, Mississippi Power recorded charges to income of $242 million ($206 million after tax), including $164 million for ongoing project costs, estimated mine and gasifier-related costs, and certain termination costs during the suspension period prior to conclusion of the Kemper Settlement Docket, as well as the charge associated with the Kemper Settlement Agreement. Additional pre-tax cancellation costs, including mine and plant closure and contract termination costs, currently estimated at approximately $50 million to $100 million (excluding salvage), are expected to be incurred in 2018. Mississippi Power has begun efforts to dispose of or abandon the mine and gasifier-related assets.
Total pre-tax charges to income related to the Kemper County energy facility were $3.4 billion ($2.4 billion after tax) for the year ended December 31, 2017. In the aggregate, since the Kemper County energy facility project started, Mississippi Power has incurred charges of $6.2 billion ($4.1 billion after tax) through December 31, 2017.
As a result of the Mississippi PSC order on February 6, 2018, rate recovery for the Kemper County energy facility is resolved, subject to any future legal challenges.
See Note 3 to the financial statements under "Kemper County Energy Facility" for additional information.
Plant Vogtle Units 3 and 4 Status
In 2009, the Georgia PSC certified construction of Plant Vogtle Units 3 and 4. In 2012, the NRC issued the related combined construction and operating licenses, which allowed full constructionThe increase also reflects lower federal income tax expense as a result of the two AP1000 nuclear units (with electric generating capacity of approximately 1,100 MWs each)Tax Reform Legislation, partially offset by impairment charges, primarily associated with asset sales at Southern Power and related facilities to begin. Until March 2017, construction on Plant Vogtle Units
Table of ContentsIndex to Financial Statements

MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS (continued)
Southern Company and Subsidiary Companies 2017 Annual ReportGas.


3 and 4 continued under the Vogtle 3 and 4 Agreement, which was a substantially fixed price agreement. On March 29, 2017, the EPC Contractor filed for bankruptcy protection under Chapter 11 of the U.S. Bankruptcy Code.
In connection with the EPC Contractor's bankruptcy filing, Georgia Power, acting for itself and as agent for the Vogtle Owners, entered into the Interim Assessment Agreement with the EPC Contractor to allow construction to continue. The Interim Assessment Agreement expired on July 27, 2017 when the Vogtle Services Agreement became effective. In August 2017, following completion of comprehensive cost to complete and cancellation cost assessments, Georgia Power filed its seventeenth VCM report with the Georgia PSC, which included a recommendation to continue construction of Plant Vogtle Units 3 and 4, with Southern Nuclear serving as project manager and Bechtel serving as the primary construction contractor. On December 21, 2017, the Georgia PSC approved Georgia Power's recommendation to continue construction.
Georgia Power expects Plant Vogtle Units 3 and 4 to be placed in service by November 2021 and November 2022, respectively. Georgia Power's revised capital cost forecast for its 45.7% proportionate share of Plant Vogtle Units 3 and 4 is $8.8 billion ($7.3 billion after reflecting the impact of payments received under a settlement agreement regarding the Toshiba Guarantee (Guarantee Settlement Agreement) and certain refunds to customers ordered by the Georgia PSC (Customer Refunds)). Georgia Power's CWIP balance for Plant Vogtle Units 3 and 4 was $3.3 billion at December 31, 2017, which is net of the Guarantee Settlement Agreement payments less the Customer Refunds. Georgia Power estimates that its financing costs for construction of Plant Vogtle Units 3 and 4 will total approximately $3.1 billion, of which $1.6 billion had been incurred through December 31, 2017.
See Note 3 to the financial statements under "Nuclear Construction" for additional information.
Earnings
Consolidated net income attributable to Southern Company was $842 million in 2017, a decrease of $1.6 billion, or 65.6%, from the prior year. The decrease was primarily due to pre-tax charges of $3.4 billion ($2.4 billion after tax) related to the Kemper IGCC at Mississippi Power. Also contributing to the change were increases of $240 million in net income from Southern Company Gas (excluding the impact of $111 million in additional expense related to the Tax Reform Legislation) reflecting the 12-month period in 2017 compared to the six-month period following the Merger closing on July 1, 2016, $264 million related to net tax benefits from the Tax Reform Legislation, higher retail electric revenues resulting from increases in base rates partially offset by milder weather and lower customer usage, and increases in renewable energy sales at Southern Power. These increases were partially offset by higher interest and depreciation and amortization.
Consolidated net income attributable to Southern Company was $2.4 billion in 2016, an increase of $81 million, or 3.4%, from the prior year. Consolidated net income increased by $114 million as a result of earnings from Southern Company Gas, which was acquired on July 1, 2016. Also contributing to the increase were higher retail electric revenues resulting from non-fuel retail rate increases and warmer weather, primarily in the third quarter 2016, as well as the 2015 correction of a Georgia Power billing error, partially offset by accruals in 2016 for expected refunds at Alabama Power and Georgia Power. Additionally, the increase was due to increases in income tax benefits and renewable energy sales at Southern Power. These increases were partially offset by higher interest expense, non-fuel operations and maintenance expenses, depreciation and amortization, lower wholesale capacity revenues, and higher estimated losses associated with the Kemper IGCC.
See Note 1215 to the financial statements under "Southern CompanyMerger with Southern Company Gas" for additional information regarding the Merger.
Basic EPS was $2.18 in 2018, $0.84 in 2017, and $2.57 in 2016, and $2.60 in 2015.2016. Diluted EPS, which factors in additional shares related to stock-based compensation, was $2.17 in 2018, $0.84 in 2017, and $2.55 in 2016, and $2.59 in 2015.2016. EPS for 2018, 2017, and 2016 was negatively impacted by $0.04, $0.04, and $0.12 per share, respectively, as a result of an increaseincreases in the average shares outstanding. See FINANCIAL CONDITION AND LIQUIDITY – "Financing Activities" herein for additional information.
Dividends
Southern Company has paid dividends on its common stock since 1948. Dividends paid per share of common stock were $2.38 in 2018, $2.30 in 2017, and $2.22 in 2016, and $2.15 in 2015.2016. In January 2018,2019, Southern Company declared a quarterly dividend of 5860 cents per share. This is the 281st285th consecutive quarter that Southern Company has paid a dividend equal to or higher than the previous quarter. For 2017,2018, the dividend payout ratio was 273%109% compared to 86%273% for 2016.2017. The increasedecrease was due to a significant reductionan increase in earnings in 2018 resulting from charges related to the Kemper IGCC.IGCC in 2017, partially offset by the charge related to construction of Plant Vogtle Units 3 and 4 in 2018. See "Earnings""Earnings" and RESULTS OF OPERATIONS"Electricity"Electricity BusinessEstimated Loss on Kemper IGCCProjects Under Construction" herein and Note 32 to the financial statements under "Georgia PowerNuclear Construction" and "Mississippi PowerKemper County Energy Facility" for additional information.

MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS (continued)
Southern Company and Subsidiary Companies 2017 Annual Report


RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
Discussion of the results of operations is divided into three parts – the Southern Company system's primary business of electricity sales, its gas business, and its other business activities.
 Amount
 2017 2016 2015
 (in millions)
Electricity business$878
 $2,571
 $2,401
Gas business243
 114
 
Other business activities(279) (237) (34)
Net Income$842
 $2,448
 $2,367
Electricity Business
Southern Company's electric utilities generate and sell electricity to retail and wholesale customers.
A condensed statement of income for the electricity business follows:
 Amount 
Increase (Decrease)
from Prior Year
 2017 2017 2016
 (in millions)
Electric operating revenues$18,540
 $599
 $499
Fuel4,400
 39
 (389)
Purchased power863

113
 105
Cost of other sales69
 11
 58
Other operations and maintenance4,340
 (183) 231
Depreciation and amortization2,457
 224
 213
Taxes other than income taxes1,063
 24
 44
Estimated loss on Kemper IGCC3,362
 2,934
 63
Total electric operating expenses16,554
 3,162
 325
Operating income1,986
 (2,563) 174
Allowance for equity funds used during construction152
 (48) (26)
Interest expense, net of amounts capitalized1,011
 80
 157
Other income (expense), net(83) (8) (43)
Income taxes82
 (1,009) (235)
Net income962
 (1,690) 183
Less:     
Dividends on preferred and preference stock of subsidiaries38
 (7) (9)
Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests46
 10
 22
Net Income Attributable to Southern Company$878
 $(1,693) $170
 2018 2017 2016
 (in millions)
Electricity business$2,304
 $878
 $2,571
Gas business372
 243
 114
Other business activities(450) (279) (237)
Net Income$2,226
 $842
 $2,448
    Table of Contents                                Index to Financial Statements        

MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS (continued)
Southern Company and Subsidiary Companies 20172018 Annual Report


Electricity Business
Southern Company's electric utilities generate and sell electricity to retail and wholesale customers. The results of operations discussed below include the results of Gulf Power through December 31, 2018. See Note 15 to the financial statements under "Southern Company's Sale of Gulf Power" for additional information.
A condensed statement of income for the electricity business follows:
 Amount 
Increase (Decrease)
from Prior Year
 2018 2018 2017
 (in millions)
Electric operating revenues$18,571
 $31
 $599
Fuel4,637
 237
 39
Purchased power971

108
 113
Cost of other sales66
 (3) 11
Other operations and maintenance4,635
 45
 (76)
Depreciation and amortization2,565
 108
 224
Taxes other than income taxes1,098
 35
 24
Estimated loss on plants under construction1,097
 (2,265) 2,934
Impairment charges156
 156
 
Gain on dispositions, net
 40
 (41)
Total electric operating expenses15,225
 (1,539) 3,228
Operating income3,346
 1,570
 (2,629)
Allowance for equity funds used during construction131
 (21) (48)
Interest expense, net of amounts capitalized1,035
 24
 80
Other income (expense), net144
 17
 58
Income taxes207
 125
 (1,009)
Net income2,379
 1,417
 (1,690)
Less:     
Dividends on preferred and preference stock of subsidiaries16
 (22) (7)
Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests59
 13
 10
Net Income Attributable to Southern Company$2,304
 $1,426
 $(1,693)

MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS (continued)
Southern Company and Subsidiary Companies 2018 Annual Report


Electric Operating Revenues
Electric operating revenues for 20172018 were $18.5$18.6 billion, reflecting a $599$31 million increase from 2016.2017. Details of electric operating revenues were as follows:
Amount
2017 20162018 2017
(in millions)(in millions)
Retail electric — prior year$15,234
 $14,987
$15,330
 $15,234
Estimated change resulting from —      
Rates and pricing508
 427
(773) 508
Sales decline(71) (35)
Sales growth (decline)84
 (71)
Weather(281) 153
300
 (281)
Fuel and other cost recovery(60) (298)281
 (60)
Retail electric — current year15,330
 15,234
15,222
 15,330
Wholesale electric revenues2,426
 1,926
2,516
 2,426
Other electric revenues681
 698
664
 681
Other revenues103
 83
169
 103
Electric operating revenues$18,540
 $17,941
$18,571
 $18,540
Percent change3.3% 2.9%0.2% 3.3%
Retail electric revenues decreased $108 million, or 0.7%, in 2018 as compared to the prior year. The significant factors driving this change are shown in the preceding table. The decrease in rates and pricing in 2018 was primarily due to revenues deferred as regulatory liabilities for customer bill credits related to the Tax Reform Legislation and expected customer refunds at Alabama Power and Georgia Power.
Retail electric revenues increased $96 million, or 0.6%, in 2017 as compared to the prior year. The significant factors driving this change are shown in the preceding table. The increase in rates and pricing in 2017 was primarily due to a Rate RSE increase at Alabama Power effective in January 2017, the recovery of Plant Vogtle Units 3 and 4 construction financing costs under the NCCR tariff at Georgia Power, and an increase in retail base rates effective July 2017 at Gulf Power.
See Note 32 to the financial statements under "Regulatory MattersSouthern CompanyGulf PowerRetail Base Rate Cases," for additional information.
Retail electric revenues increased $247 million, or 1.6%, in 2016 as compared to the prior year. The significant factors driving this change are shown in the preceding table. The increase in rates and pricing in 2016 was primarily due to increases in base tariffs at Georgia Power under the 2013 ARP and the NCCR tariff and increased revenues at Alabama Power under Rate CNP Compliance, all effective January 1, 2016. Also contributing to the increase in rates and pricing for 2016 was the 2015 correction of an error affecting billings since 2013 to a small number of large commercial and industrial customers under a rate plan allowing for variable demand-driven pricing at Georgia Power and the implementation of rates at Mississippi Power for certain Kemper County energy facility in-service assets, effective September 2015. These increases were partially offset by accruals in 2016 for expected refunds at Alabama Power and Georgia Power. See Note 3 to the financial statements under "Kemper County Energy FacilityRate Recovery" for additional information.
See Note 3 to the financial statements under "Regulatory MattersAlabama PowerRate RSE" and " – Rate CNP Compliance," "Georgia PowerRate Plans," and "Nuclear Construction" and Note 1 to the financial statements under "General" for additional information. Also see "Energy Sales" below for a discussion of changes in the volume of energy sold, including changes related to sales declinegrowth (decline) and weather.
Electric rates for the traditional electric operating companies include provisions to adjust billings for fluctuations in fuel costs, including the energy component of purchased power costs. Under these provisions, fuel revenues generally equal fuel expenses, including the energy component of PPA costs, and do not affect net income. The traditional electric operating companies each have one or more regulatory mechanisms to recover other costs such as environmental and other compliance costs, storm damage, new plants, and PPA capacity costs.
Wholesale electric revenues consist of PPAs primarily with investor-owned utilities and electric cooperatives and short-term opportunity sales. Wholesale electric revenues from PPAs (other than solar and wind PPAs) have both capacity and energy components. Capacity revenues generally represent the greatest contribution to net income and are designed to provide recovery of fixed costs plus a return on investment. Energy revenues will vary depending on fuel prices, the market prices of wholesale energy compared to the Southern Company system's generation, demand for energy within the Southern Company system's electric service territory, and the availability of the Southern Company system's generation. Increases and decreases in energy revenues that are driven by fuel prices are accompanied by an increase or decrease in fuel costs and do not have a significant impact on net income. Energy sales from solar and wind PPAs do not have a capacity charge and customers either purchase the energy output of a dedicated renewable facility through an energy charge or through a fixed price related to the energy. As a
Table of ContentsIndex to Financial Statements

MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS (continued)
Southern Company and Subsidiary Companies 2017 Annual Report


result, the Company's ability to recover fixed and variable operations and maintenance expenses is dependent upon the level of energy generated from these facilities, which can be impacted by weather conditions, equipment performance, transmission constraints, and other factors. Wholesale electric revenues at Mississippi Power include FERC-regulated municipal and rural associationMRA sales as well as market-based sales. Short-term opportunity sales are made at market-based rates that generally provide a margin above the Southern Company system's variable cost to produce the energy.
Table of ContentsIndex to Financial Statements

MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS (continued)
Southern Company and Subsidiary Companies 2018 Annual Report


Wholesale electric revenues from power sales were as follows:
2017 2016 20152018 2017 2016
(in millions)(in millions)
Capacity and other$838
 $771
 $875
$620
 $642
 $570
Energy1,588
 1,155
 923
1,896
 1,784
 1,356
Total$2,426
 $1,926
 $1,798
$2,516
 $2,426
 $1,926
In 2018, wholesale revenues increased $90 million, or 3.7%, as compared to the prior year due to a $112 million increase in energy revenues, partially offset by a $22 million decrease in capacity revenues. The increase in energy revenues was primarily related to Southern Power and includes new PPAs related to existing natural gas facilities, new renewable facilities, and an increase in the volume of KWHs sold at existing renewable facilities, partially offset by a decrease in non-PPA revenues from short-term sales. The decrease in capacity revenues was primarily due to the expiration of a wholesale contract in the fourth quarter 2017 at Georgia Power.
In 2017, wholesale revenues increased $500 million, or 26.0%, as compared to the prior year due to a $433$428 million increase in energy revenues and a $67$72 million increase in capacity revenues, primarily at Southern Power. The increase in energy revenues was primarily due to increases in renewable energy sales arising from new solar and wind facilities and non-PPA revenues from short-term sales. The increase in capacity revenues was primarily due to a PPA related to new natural gas facilities and additional customer capacity requirements.
In 2016, wholesale revenues increased $128 million, or 7.1%, as compared to the prior year due to a $232 million increase in energy revenues, partially offset by a $104 million decrease in capacity revenues. The increase in energy revenues was primarily due to increases in short-term sales and renewable energy sales at Southern Power, partially offset by lower fuel prices. The decrease in capacity revenues was primarily due to the expiration of wholesale contracts at Georgia Power and Gulf Power, the elimination in consolidation of a Southern Power PPA that was remarketed from a third party to Georgia Power in January 2016, and unit retirements at Georgia Power, partially offset by an increase due to a new wholesale contract at Alabama Power in the first quarter 2016.
Other Electric Revenues
Other electric revenues decreased $17 million, or 2.4%, and increased $41 million, or 6.2%2.5%, in 2017 and 2016, respectively,2018 as compared to the prior years.year. The 2017 decrease wasis primarily related to a decrease in open access transmission tariff revenues, largely due to a lower rate related to the Tax Reform Legislation. Other electric revenues decreased $17 million, or 2.4%, in 2017, as compared to the prior year. The decrease reflects a $15 million decrease in open access transmission tariff revenues, primarily as a result of the expiration of long-term transmission services contracts at Georgia Power. The 2016 increase was primarily due to a $14 million increase in customer temporary facilities services revenues and a $12 million increase in outdoor lighting revenues at Georgia Power, primarily attributable to LED conversions.
Energy Sales
Changes in revenues are influenced heavily by the change in the volume of energy sold from year to year. KWH sales for 20172018 and the percent change from the prior year were as follows:
Total
KWHs
 
Total KWH
Percent Change
 
Weather-Adjusted
Percent Change
Total
KWHs
 
Total KWH
Percent Change
 
Weather-Adjusted
Percent Change
2017 2017 2016 2017 20162018 2018 2017 2018 2017
(in billions)        (in billions)        
Residential50.5
 (5.3)% 2.3 % (0.3)% 0.2 %54.6
 8.0 % (5.3)% 1.2 % (0.3)%
Commercial52.3
 (2.6) 0.4
 (0.9) (1.0)53.5
 2.1
 (2.6) 0.5
 (0.9)
Industrial52.8
 
 (2.1) 
 (2.2)53.3
 1.1
 
 1.1
 
Other0.9
 (4.0) (1.7) (3.9) (1.7)0.8
 (5.5) (4.0) (5.7) (3.9)
Total retail156.5
 (2.6) 0.2
 (0.4)% (1.0)%162.2
 3.6
 (2.6) 0.9 % (0.4)%
Wholesale49.0
 32.4
 21.4
    49.9
 1.9
 32.4
    
Total energy sales205.5
 3.9 % 3.6 %    212.1
 3.2 % 3.9 %    
Changes in retail energy sales are generally the result of changes in electricity usage by customers, changes in weather, and changes in the number of customers. Retail energy sales increased 5.7 billion KWHs in 2018 as compared to the prior year. This increase was primarily due to colder weather in the first quarter 2018 and warmer weather in the second and third quarters 2018 compared to the corresponding periods in 2017. Weather-adjusted residential KWH sales increased primarily due to customer growth. Weather-adjusted commercial KWH sales increased primarily due to customer growth, partially offset by decreased customer usage resulting from customer initiatives in energy savings and an ongoing migration to the electronic commerce business model. Industrial KWH energy sales increased primarily due to increased sales in the primary metals sector, partially offset by decreased sales in the paper sector.
Retail energy sales decreased 4.2 billion KWHs in 2017 as compared to the prior year. This decrease was primarily due to milder weather and decreased customer usage, partially offset by customer growth. Weather-adjusted residential KWH sales decreased primarily due to decreased customer usage resulting from an increase in penetration of
    Table of Contents                                Index to Financial Statements        

MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS (continued)
Southern Company and Subsidiary Companies 20172018 Annual Report


primarily due to decreased customer usage resulting from an increase in penetration of energy-efficient residential appliances and an increase in multi-family housing, partially offset by customer growth. Weather-adjusted commercial KWH sales decreased primarily due to decreased customer usage resulting from customer initiatives in energy savings and an ongoing migration to the electronic commerce business model, partially offset by customer growth. Industrial KWH energy sales were flat primarily due to decreased sales in the paper, stone, clay, and glass, transportation, and chemicals sectors, offset by increased sales in the primary metals and textile sectors. Additionally, Hurricane Irma negatively impacted customer usage for all customer classes.
Retail energy sales increased 261 million KWHs in 2016 as compared to the prior year. This increase was primarily due to warmer weather in the third quarter 2016 as compared to the corresponding period in 2015 and customer growth, partially offset by decreased customer usage. The decrease in industrial KWH energy sales was primarily due to decreased sales in the primary metals, chemicals, paper, pipeline, and stone, clay, and glass sectors. A strong dollar, low oil prices, and weak global economic conditions constrained growth in the industrial sector in 2016. Weather-adjusted commercial KWH sales decreased primarily due to decreased customer usage resulting from an increase in electronic commerce transactions and energy saving initiatives, partially offset by customer growth. Weather-adjusted residential KWH sales increased primarily due to customer growth, partially offset by decreased customer usage primarily resulting from an increase in multi-family housing and efficiency improvements in residential appliances and lighting. Household income, one of the primary drivers of residential customer usage, had modest growth in 2016.
See "Electric Operating Revenues" above for a discussion of significant changes in wholesale revenues related to changes in price and KWH sales.
Other Revenues
Other revenues increased $66 million, or 64.1%, in 2018 as compared to the prior year. The increase was primarily due to unregulated sales of products and services that were reclassified from other income (expense), net as a result of the adoption of ASC 606, Revenue from Contracts with Customers (ASC 606). See Note 1 to the financial statements for additional information regarding the adoption of ASC 606.
Other revenues increased $20 million or 24.1%, in 2017 as compared to the prior year. The 2017 increase was primarily due to additional third party infrastructure services.
Other revenues increased $83 million in 2016 as compared to the prior year. The 2016 increase was primarily due to revenues from certain non-regulated sales of products and services by the traditional electric operating companies that were reclassified as other revenues for consistency of presentation on a consolidated basis following the PowerSecure acquisition. In prior periods, these revenues were included in other income (expense), net.
Fuel and Purchased Power Expenses
Fuel costs constitute one of the largest expenses for the electric utilities. The mix of fuel sources for the generation of electricity is determined primarily by demand, the unit cost of fuel consumed, and the availability of generating units. Additionally, the electric utilities purchase a portion of their electricity needs from the wholesale market.
Details of the Southern Company system's generation and purchased power were as follows:
2017 2016 20152018 2017 2016
Total generation (in billions of KWHs)
194
 188
 187
200
 194
 188
Total purchased power (in billions of KWHs)
20
 19
 13
21
 20
 19
Sources of generation (percent)
          
Gas46
 46
 46
46
 46
 46
Coal30
 33
 34
30
 30
 33
Nuclear16
 16
 16
15
 16
 16
Hydro2
 2
 3
3
 2
 2
Other6
 3
 1
6
 6
 3
Cost of fuel, generated (in cents per net KWH)
     
Cost of fuel, generated (in cents per net KWH)(a)
     
Gas2.79
 2.48
 2.60
2.89
 2.79
 2.48
Coal2.81
 3.04
 3.55
2.80
 2.81
 3.04
Nuclear0.79
 0.81
 0.79
0.80
 0.79
 0.81
Average cost of fuel, generated (in cents per net KWH)(a)
2.44
 2.40
 2.64
2.50
 2.44
 2.40
Average cost of purchased power (in cents per net KWH)(*)
5.19
 4.81
 6.11
Average cost of purchased power (in cents per net KWH)(b)
5.46
 5.19
 4.81
(*)(a)For 2018, cost of fuel, generated and average cost of fuel, generated excludes a $30 million adjustment associated with a May 2018 Alabama PSC accounting order related to excess deferred income taxes.
(b)Average cost of purchased power includes fuel purchased by the Southern Company system for tolling agreements where power is generated by the provider.
In 2018, total fuel and purchased power expenses were $5.6 billion, an increase of $345 million, or 6.6%, as compared to the prior year. The increase was primarily the result of a $178 million increase in the volume of KWHs generated and purchased primarily due to colder weather in the first quarter 2018 and warmer weather in the second and third quarters 2018 compared to the corresponding periods in 2017 and a $137 million increase in the average cost of fuel and purchased power primarily due to higher natural gas prices.
In addition, fuel expense increased $30 million in 2018 as a result of an Alabama PSC accounting order authorizing the amortization of a regulatory liability to offset under recovered fuel costs. See FUTURE EARNINGS POTENTIAL – "Regulatory Matters – Alabama Power – Tax Reform Accounting Order" herein for additional information.
    Table of Contents                                Index to Financial Statements        

MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS (continued)
Southern Company and Subsidiary Companies 20172018 Annual Report


In 2017, total fuel and purchased power expenses were $5.3 billion, an increase of $152 million, or 3.0%, as compared to the prior year. The increase was primarily the result of a $196 million increase in the average cost of fuel and purchased power primarily due to higher natural gas prices, partially offset by a $44 million net decrease in the volume of KWHs generated and purchased.
In 2016, total fuel and purchased power expenses were $5.1 billion, a decrease of $284 million, or 5.3%, as compared to the prior year. The decrease was primarily the result of a $650 million decrease in the average cost of fuel and purchased power primarily due to lower coal and natural gas prices, partially offset by a $366 million increase in the volume of KWHs generated and purchased.
Fuel and purchased power energy transactions at the traditional electric operating companies are generally offset by fuel revenues and do not have a significant impact on net income. See FUTURE EARNINGS POTENTIAL – "Regulatory MattersFuel Cost Recovery" herein for additional information. Fuel expenses incurred under Southern Power's PPAs are generally the responsibility of the counterparties and do not significantly impact net income.
Fuel
In 2018, fuel expense was $4.6 billion, an increase of $237 million, or 5.4%, as compared to the prior year. The increase was primarily due to a 3.6% increase in the average cost of natural gas per KWH generated, a 3.5% increase in the volume of KWHs generated by coal, and a 2.8% increase in the volume of KWHs generated by natural gas.
In 2017, fuel expense was $4.4 billion, an increase of $39 million, or 0.9%, as compared to the prior year. The increase was primarily due to a 12.5% increase in the average cost of natural gas per KWH generated and a 2.8% increase in the volume of KWHs generated by natural gas, partially offset by a 7.9% decrease in the volume of KWHs generated by coal and a 7.6% decrease in the average cost of coal per KWH generated.
Purchased Power
In 2016, fuel2018, purchased power expense was $4.4 billion, a decrease$971 million, an increase of $389$108 million, or 8.2%12.5%, as compared to the prior year. The decreaseincrease was primarily due to a 14.4% decrease5.2% increase in the average cost of coal per KWH generated,purchased, primarily as a 4.6% decrease in the average costresult of higher natural gas per KWH generated,prices, and a 2.7% decrease in the volume of KWHs generated by coal, partially offset by a 3.5%5.2% increase in the volume of KWHs generated by natural gas.
Purchased Powerpurchased.
In 2017, purchased power expense was $863 million, an increase of $113 million, or 15.1%, as compared to the prior year. The increase was primarily due to a 7.9% increase in the average cost per KWH purchased, primarily as a result of higher natural gas prices, and a 5.0% increase in the volume of KWHs purchased.
In 2016, purchased power expense was $750 million, an increase of $105 million, or 16.3%, as compared to the prior year. The increase was primarily due to a 45.6% increase in the volume of KWHs purchased, partially offset by a 21.3% decrease in the average cost per KWH purchased primarily as a result of lower natural gas prices.
Energy purchases will vary depending on demand for energy within the Southern Company system's electric service territory, the market prices of wholesale energy as compared to the cost of the Southern Company system's generation, and the availability of the Southern Company system's generation.
Cost of Other Sales
Cost of other sales were $69 million and $58 million in 2017 and 2016, respectively. These costs were related to certain non-regulated sales of products and services by the traditional electric operating companies that were reclassified as cost of other sales for consistency of presentation on a consolidated basis following the PowerSecure acquisition. In prior periods, these costs were included in other income (expense), net.
Other Operations and Maintenance Expenses
Other operations and maintenance expenses decreased $183increased $45 million, or 4.0%1.0%, in 2018 as compared to the prior year. The increase was primarily due to a $74 million increase in transmission and distribution costs, primarily related to additional vegetation management at Georgia Power, and $74 million in expenses from unregulated sales of products and services that were reclassified to other operations and maintenance expenses as a result of the adoption of ASC 606. In prior periods, these expenses were included in other income (expense), net. These increases were partially offset by a $32.5 million charge in the first quarter 2017 related to the write-down of Gulf Power's ownership of Plant Scherer Unit 3 in accordance with a rate case settlement agreement, a $30 million net decrease in employee compensation and benefits, including pension costs, largely due to a decrease in active medical costs at Alabama Power and a 2017 employee attrition plan at Georgia Power, and a $27 million decrease in customer accounts, service, and sales costs primarily due to cost-saving initiatives. See Note 1 to the financial statements for additional information regarding the adoption of ASC 606.
Other operations and maintenance expenses decreased $76 million, or 1.6%, in 2017 as compared to the prior year. The decrease was primarily due to cost containment and modernization activities implemented at Georgia Power that contributed to decreases of $85 million in generation maintenance costs, $49 million in other employee compensation and benefits, $46 million in transmission and distribution overhead line maintenance, $22 million in other employee compensation and benefits, and $22 million in customer accounts, service, and sales costs. Other factors include a $40 million increase in gains from sales of assets at Georgia Power andAdditionally, there was a $34 million decrease in scheduled outage and maintenance costs at generation facilities. These decreases were partially offset by a $56 million increase associated with new facilities at Southern Power, a $37 million increase in transmission and distribution costs primarily due to vegetation management at Alabama Power, and $32.5 million resulting from the write-down of Gulf Power's ownership of Plant Scherer Unit 3 in accordance with a rate case settlement agreement approved by the Florida PSC on April 4, 2017 (2017 Rate Case Settlement Agreement).
Table of ContentsIndex to Financial Statements

MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS (continued)
Southern Company and Subsidiary Companies 2017 Annual Report


Other operations and maintenance expenses increased $231 million, or 5.4%, in 2016 as compared to the prior year. The increase was primarily related to a $76 million increase in transmission and distribution expenses primarily related to overhead line maintenance, a $37 million decrease in gains from sales of assets at Georgia Power, a $36 million charge in connection with cost containment activities at Georgia Power, and a $35 million increase at Southern Power associated with new solar and wind facilities placed in service in 2015 and 2016. Additionally, the increase was due to a $19 million increase in generation expenses primarily related to environmental costs, a $19 million increase in business development and support expenses at Southern Power, and an $11 million increase in scheduled outage and maintenance costs at generation facilities, partially offset by a $41 million net decrease in employee compensation and benefits, including pension costs.agreement.
Production expenses and transmission and distribution expenses fluctuate from year to year due to variations in outage and maintenance schedules and normal changes in the cost of labor and materials.
Table of ContentsIndex to Financial Statements

MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS (continued)
Southern Company and Subsidiary Companies 2018 Annual Report


Depreciation and Amortization
Depreciation and amortization increased $108 million, or 4.4%, in 2018 as compared to the prior year. The increase was primarily related to additional plant in service. Additionally, the increase reflects $34 million in depreciation credits recognized in 2017, as authorized in Gulf Power's 2013 rate case settlement.
Depreciation and amortization increased $224 million, or 10.0%, in 2017 as compared to the prior year. The increase reflects $203 million related to additional plant in service at the traditional electric operating companies and Southern Power and a $13 million increase in amortization related to environmental compliance at Mississippi Power. The increase was partially offset by a $34 million increase in the reductions in depreciation authorizedcredits recognized in accordance with Gulf Power's 2013 rate case settlement approved by the Florida PSC as compared to the corresponding period in 2016.
Depreciation and amortization increased $213 million, or 10.5%, in 2016 as compared to the prior year primarily due to additional plant in service at the traditional electric operating companies and Southern Power.settlement.
See Note 12 to the financial statements under "Southern CompanyRegulatory Assets and Liabilities" and Note 5 to the financial statements under "Depreciation and Amortization" for additional information.
Taxes Other Than Income Taxes
Taxes other than income taxes increased $35 million, or 3.3%, in 2018 as compared to the prior year primarily due to increased property taxes associated with higher assessed values and an increase in municipal franchise fees primarily related to higher retail revenues at Georgia Power.
Taxes other than income taxes increased $24 million, or 2.3%, in 2017 as compared to the prior year primarily due to an increase in property taxes due to new facilities at Southern Power.
Taxes other than income taxes increased $44 million, or 4.4%, in 2016 as compared to the prior year primarily due to an increase in property taxes due to higher assessed value of property at the traditional electric operating companies, increases in state and municipal utility license tax bases at Alabama Power, an increase in payroll taxes at Georgia Power, and an increase in franchise taxes at Mississippi Power.
Estimated Loss on Kemper IGCCProjects Under Construction
In 2017, 2016, and 2015,the second quarter 2018, an estimated probable losses onloss of $1.1 billion was recorded to reflect Georgia Power's revised estimate to complete construction and start-up of Plant Vogtle Units 3 and 4, which reflects the increase in costs included in the revised base capital cost forecast for which Georgia Power did not seek rate recovery and costs included in the revised construction contingency estimate for which Georgia Power may seek rate recovery as and when such costs are appropriately included in the base capital cost forecast. See Note 2 to the financial statements under "Georgia PowerNuclear Construction" for additional information.
Charges associated with the Kemper IGCC of $37 million, $3.4 billion, and $428 million and $365 million, respectively, were recorded in 2018, 2017, and 2016, respectively. The 2018 pre-tax charge of $37 million primarily resulted from the abandonment and related closure activities and ongoing period costs, net of sales proceeds, for the mine and gasifier-related assets at Southern Company.the Kemper County energy facility. On June 28, 2017, Mississippi Power suspended the gasifier portion of the project and recorded a charge to earnings for the remaining $2.8 billion book value of the gasifier portion of the project. Prior to the suspension, Mississippi Power recorded losses for revisions of estimated costs expected to be incurred on construction of the Kemper IGCC in excess of the $2.88 billion cost cap established by the Mississippi PSC, net of $245 million of grants awarded to the Initialproject by the DOE Grantsunder the Clean Coal Power Initiative Round 2 and excluding the Cost Cap Exceptions.cost of the lignite mine and equipment, the cost of the CO
2 pipeline facilities, AFUDC, and certain general exceptions. See Note 32 to the financial statements under "Mississippi PowerKemper County Energy Facility" for additional information.
Impairment Charges
In the second quarter 2018, Southern Power recorded a $119 million asset impairment charge in contemplation of the sale of Plant Oleander and Plant Stanton Unit A (together, the Florida Plants) and in the third quarter 2018 recorded a $36 million asset impairment charge on wind turbine equipment held for development projects. There were no asset impairment charges recorded in 2017 or 2016. See Note 15 to the financial statements under "Southern Power – Sales of Natural Gas Plants" and " – Development Projects" for additional information.
Gain on Dispositions, Net
Gain on dispositions, net decreased $40 million in 2018 and increased $41 million in 2017 as compared to the prior periods primarily due to gains on sales of assets at Georgia Power recorded in 2017.
Allowance for Equity Funds Used During Construction
AFUDC equity decreased $21 million, or 13.8%, in 2018 as compared to the prior year primarily due to Mississippi Power's suspension of the Kemper IGCC construction in June 2017, partially offset by a higher AFUDC rate resulting from a higher equity ratio and lower short-term borrowings at Georgia Power and a higher AFUDC base related to steam and transmission construction projects at Alabama Power.
Table of ContentsIndex to Financial Statements

MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS (continued)
Southern Company and Subsidiary Companies 2018 Annual Report


AFUDC equity decreased $48 million, or 24.0%, in 2017 as compared to the prior year primarily due to Mississippi Power's suspension of the Kemper IGCC project in June 2017.
AFUDC equity decreased $26 million, or 11.5%, in 2016 as compared to the prior year primarily due to environmental and generation projects being placed in service at Alabama Power and Gulf Power, partially offset by a higher AFUDC rate and an increase in Kemper County energy facility CWIP subject to AFUDC at Mississippi Power prior to the suspension of the gasifier portion of the project.
See Note 32 to the financial statements under "Mississippi PowerKemper County Energy Facility" for additional information.
Interest Expense, Net of Amounts Capitalized
Interest expense, net of amounts capitalized increased $24 million, or 2.4%, in 2018 as compared to the prior year. The increase was primarily related to Mississippi Power and reflects a $33 million net reduction in interest recorded in 2017 following a settlement with the IRS related to research and experimental deductions and a $29 million reduction in interest capitalized related to the Kemper IGCC suspension in June 2017. The increase also reflects an increase in outstanding borrowings and higher interest rates at Alabama Power, partially offset by a decrease in outstanding borrowings at Georgia Power. See Note 10 to the financial statements under "Section 174 Research and Experimental Deduction" for additional information.
Interest expense, net of amounts capitalized increased $80 million, or 8.6%, in 2017 as compared to the prior year primarily due to an increase in average outstanding long-term debt, primarily at Southern Power and Georgia Power, and a $37 million decrease in interest capitalized, primarily at Southern Power and Mississippi Power, partially offset by a net reduction of $36$33 million
Table of ContentsIndex to Financial Statements

MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS (continued)
Southern Company and Subsidiary Companies 2017 Annual Report


following Mississippi Power's settlement with the IRS related to research and experimental deductions. See Note 510 to the financial statements under "Unrecognized Tax Benefits" for additional information.
Interest expense, net of amounts capitalized increased $157 million, or 20.3%, in 2016 as compared to the prior year primarily due to an increase in interest expense at Southern Power related to additional debt issued primarily to fund its growth strategy and continuous construction program, increases in both the average outstanding long-term debt balance and the average interest rate at the traditional electric operating companies, and the May 2015 termination of an asset purchase agreement between Mississippi Power and Cooperative Energy and the resulting reversal of accrued interest on related deposits.
See Note 68 to the financial statements for additional information.
Other Income (Expense), Net
Other income (expense), net decreased $8increased $17 million, or 10.7%13.4%, in 2018 as compared to the prior year primarily due to the settlement of Mississippi Power's Deepwater Horizon claim in May 2018 and a gain from a joint-development wind project at Southern Power, which is attributable to Southern Power's partner in the project and fully offset within noncontrolling interests, partially offset by an increase in charitable donations. See Note 3 to the financial statements under "General Litigation Matters– Mississippi Power" and Note 7 to the financial statements under "Southern Power" for additional information.
Other income (expense), net increased $58 million, or 84.1%, in 2017 as compared to the prior year primarily due to a decrease in non-service cost components of net periodic pension and other postretirement benefits costs, partially offset by increases in charitable donations. The change also includes an increase of $159 million in currency losses arising from a translation of euro-denominated fixed-rate notes into U.S. dollars, fully offset by an equal change in gains on the foreign currency hedges that were reclassified from accumulated OCI into earnings at Southern Power. See Note 1 under "Recently Adopted Accounting Standards" and Note 11 to the financial statements for additional information on net periodic pension and other postretirement benefit costs.
Other income (expense), net decreased $43Income Taxes
Income taxes increased $125 million, or 134.4%152.4%, in 20162018 as compared to the prior yearyear. The increase was primarily due to an increase in pre-tax earnings, primarily resulting from charges recorded in 2017 related to the reclassification of revenues and costs associated with certain non-regulated sales of products and servicesKemper IGCC at Mississippi Power, partially offset by the traditional electric operating companies to other revenuesestimated probable loss on Plant Vogtle Units 3 and cost of other sales for consistency of presentation on a consolidated basis following the PowerSecure acquisition. The net amounts reclassified were $25 million. Also contributing to the decrease was an $8 million decrease in customer contributions in aid of construction and a $6 million decrease in wholesale operating fee revenue4 at Georgia Power.
Income TaxesPower recognized in the second quarter 2018. This increase was partially offset by lower federal income tax expense, as well as benefits from the flowback of excess deferred income taxes as a result of the Tax Reform Legislation.
Income taxes decreased $1.0 billion, or 92.5%, in 2017 as compared to the prior year primarily due to $809 million in tax benefits related to estimated losses on the Kemper IGCC at Mississippi Power and $346 million in net tax benefits resulting from the Tax Reform Legislation.
Income taxes decreased $235 million, or 17.7%, in 2016 as compared to the prior year primarily due to increased federal income tax benefits related to ITCs for solar plants placed in service and PTCs from wind generation at Southern Power in 2016.
See Note 510 to the financial statements for additional information.
Dividends on Preferred and Preference Stock of Subsidiaries
Dividends on preferred and preference stock of subsidiaries decreased $22 million, or 57.9%, in 2018 as compared to 2017 and decreased $7 million, or 15.6%, in 2017 as compared to 2016. These decreases were primarily due to the 2017 redemptions of all outstanding shares of preferred and preference stock at Georgia Power and Gulf Power. See Note 8 to the financial statements for additional information.
Net Income Attributable to Noncontrolling Interests
Substantially all noncontrolling interests relate to renewable projects at Southern Power. Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests increased $13 million, or 28.3%, in 2018, as compared to the prior year. The increase was primarily due to $20 million of net income allocations due to the sale of a noncontrolling 33% equity interest in SP Solar in 2018 and $14
Table of ContentsIndex to Financial Statements

MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS (continued)
Southern Company and Subsidiary Companies 2018 Annual Report


million of other income allocations attributable to a joint-development wind project, partially offset by a reduction of $19 million due to HLBV income allocations between Southern Power and tax equity partners for partnerships entered into during 2018. In 2017, noncontrolling interests increased $10 million, or 28%, compared to 2016 primarily due to additional net income allocations from new solar partnerships.
See Note 15 under "Southern Power" for additional information.
Gas Business
Southern Company Gas distributes natural gas through utilities in sevenfour states and is involved in several other complementary businesses including gas marketing services,pipeline investments, wholesale gas services, and gas midstream operations.
On July 1, 2016, Southern Company Gas became a wholly-owned, direct subsidiary of Southern Company. Prior to the completion of the Merger, Southern Company and Southern Company Gas operated as separate companies. The condensed statements of income herein includes Southern Company Gas' results of operations since July 1, 2016. See Note 12 to the financial statements under "Southern CompanyMerger with Southern Company Gas" for additional information regarding the Merger, including certain pro forma results of operations.
Table of ContentsIndex to Financial Statements

MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS (continued)
Southern Company and Subsidiary Companies 2017 Annual Report


marketing services.
A condensed statement of income for the gas business follows:
Amount Increase (Decrease)
from Prior Year
Amount Increase (Decrease)
from Prior Year
2017 20172018 2018 2017
(in millions)(in millions)
Operating revenues$3,920
 $2,268
$3,909
 $(11) $2,268
Cost of natural gas1,601
 988
1,539
 (62) 988
Cost of other sales29
 19
12
 (17) 19
Other operations and maintenance940
 417
981
 36
 424
Depreciation and amortization501
 263
500
 (1) 263
Taxes other than income taxes184
 113
211
 27
 113
Impairment charges42
 42
 
Gain on dispositions, net(291) (291) 
Total operating expenses3,255
 1,800
2,994
 (266) 1,807
Operating income665
 468
915
 255
 461
Earnings from equity method investments106
 46
148
 42
 46
Interest expense, net of amounts capitalized200
 119
228
 28
 119
Other income (expense), net39
 25
1
 (43) 32
Income taxes367
 291
464
 97
 291
Net income$243
 $129
$372
 $129
 $129
The changes inIn the table above, the 2018 changes for Southern Company Gas reflect the year ended December 31, 2018 compared to 2017. The Southern Company Gas Dispositions were completed by July 29, 2018 and represent the primary variance driver for the 2018 changes. Additional detailed variance explanations are provided herein. The 2017 changes reflect the 12-month period in 2017 compared to the six-month period following the Merger closing on July 1, 2016.2016, which is the primary variance driver. Additionally, earnings from equity method investments include Southern Company Gas' acquisition of a 50% equity interest in Southern Natural Gas Company, L.L.C. (SNG)SNG completed in September 2016. See Note 1215 to the financial statements under "Southern Company Gas" for additional information on Southern Company Gas' investment in SNG.SNG and the Southern Company Gas Dispositions.
Seasonality of Results
During the period from November through March when natural gas usage and operating revenues are generally higher (Heating Season), more customers are connected to Southern Company Gas' distribution systems, and natural gas usage is higher in periods of colder weather. Occasionally in the summer, operating revenues are impacted due to peak usage by power generators in response to summer energy demands. Southern Company Gas' base operating expenses, excluding cost of natural gas, bad debt expense, and certain incentive compensation costs, are incurred relatively equally over any given year. Thus, operating results can vary significantly from quarter to quarter as a result of seasonality. For 2017,2018, the percentage of operating revenues and net income generated during the Heating Season (January through March and November through December) were 67.3%68.7% and 73.7%96.0%, respectively. For July 1, 2016 through December 31, 2016,2017, the percentage of operating revenues and net income generated during the Heating Season (Novemberwere 67.3% and December) were 67.1% and 96.5%73.7%, respectively. The 2017 net income generated during the Heating Season was significantly impacted by additional tax expense recorded in the fourth quarter resulting from the Tax Reform Legislation. See FUTURE EARNINGS POTENTIAL – "Income Tax MattersFederal Tax Reform Legislation" herein for additional information.
Table of ContentsIndex to Financial Statements

MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS (continued)
Southern Company and Subsidiary Companies 2018 Annual Report


Operating Revenues
Operating revenues in 2018 were $3.9 billion, reflecting an $11 million decrease from 2017. Details of operating revenues were as follows:
 (in millions) (% change)
Operating revenues – prior year$3,920
  
Estimated change resulting from –   
Infrastructure replacement programs and base rate changes31
 0.8
Gas costs and other cost recovery3
 0.1
Weather13
 0.3
Wholesale gas services138
 3.5
Southern Company Gas Dispositions(*)
(228) (5.8)
Other32
 0.8
Operating revenues – current year$3,909
 (0.3)%
(*)Includes a $154 million decrease related to natural gas revenues, including alternative revenue programs, and a $74 million decrease related to other revenues. See Note 15 to the financial statements under "Southern Company Gas" for additional information.
Revenues from infrastructure replacement programs and base rate changes increased in 2018 primarily due to a $48 million increase at Nicor Gas, partially offset by a $12 million decrease at Atlanta Gas Light. These amounts include the natural gas distribution utilities' continued investments recovered through infrastructure replacement programs and base rate increases less revenue reductions for the impacts of the Tax Reform Legislation. See Note 2 to the financial statements under "Southern Company Gas" for additional information.
Revenues increased due to colder weather, as determined by Heating Degree Days, in 2018 compared to 2017.
Revenues from wholesale gas services increased in 2018 primarily due to increased commercial activity, partially offset by derivative losses.
Other revenues increased in 2018 primarily due to a $15 million increase from the Dalton Pipeline being placed in service in August 2017 and a $14 million increase in Nicor Gas' revenue taxes.
Natural gas distribution rates include provisions to adjust billings for fluctuations in natural gas costs. Therefore, gas costs recovered through natural gas revenues generally equal the amount expensed in cost of natural gas and do not affect net income from the natural gas distribution utilities.
Cost of Natural Gas
Excluding Atlanta Gas Light, which does not sell natural gas to end-use customers, the natural gas distribution utilities charge their utility customers for natural gas consumed using natural gas cost recovery mechanisms set by the applicable state regulatory agencies. Under these mechanisms, all prudently-incurred natural gas costs are passed through to customers without markup, subject to regulatory review. The natural gas distribution utilities defer or accrue the difference between the actual cost of natural gas and the amount of commodity revenue earned in a given period. The deferred or accrued amount is either billed or refunded to customers prospectively through adjustments to the commodity rate. Deferred natural gas costs are reflected as regulatory assets and accrued natural gas costs are reflected as regulatory liabilities. Therefore, gas costs recovered through natural gas revenues generally equal the amount expensed in cost of natural gas and do not affect net income from the natural gas distribution utilities. Cost of natural gas at the natural gas distribution utilities represented 83.2% of the total cost of natural gas for 2018.
Gas marketing services customers are charged for actual and estimated natural gas consumed. Cost of natural gas includes the cost of fuel and associated transportation costs, lost and unaccounted for gas, adjustments to reduce the value of inventories to market value, if applicable, and gains and losses associated with certain derivatives.
Cost of natural gas in 2018 was $1.5 billion, a decrease of $62 million, or 3.9%, compared to 2017, which was substantially all as a result of the Southern Company Gas Dispositions.
Table of ContentsIndex to Financial Statements

MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS (continued)
Southern Company and Subsidiary Companies 2018 Annual Report


Cost of Other Sales
Cost of other sales in 2018 was $12 million, a decrease of $17 million, or 58.6%, compared to 2017 primarily related to the disposition of Pivotal Home Solutions.
Other Operations and Maintenance Expenses
Other operations and maintenance expenses increased $36 million, or 3.8%, in 2018 compared to the prior year. Excluding a $39 million decrease related to the Southern Company Gas Dispositions, other operations and maintenance expenses increased $75 million. This increase was primarily due to a $53 million increase in compensation and benefit costs, including a $12 million one-time increase for the adoption of a new paid time off policy to align with the Southern Company system, a $28 million increase in disposition-related costs, and an $11 million expense for a litigation settlement to facilitate the sale of Pivotal Home Solutions. These increases were partially offset by a $27 million decrease in bad debt expense primarily at Nicor Gas, which was offset by a decrease in revenues as a result of the related regulatory recovery mechanism. See Note 3 to the financial statements under "General Litigation Matters – Southern Company Gas" for additional information on the litigation settlement.
Depreciation and Amortization
Depreciation and amortization decreased $1 million, or 0.2%, in 2018 compared to the prior year. Excluding a $37 million decrease related to the Southern Company Gas Dispositions, depreciation and amortization increased $36 million. The increase was primarily due to continued infrastructure investments at the natural gas distribution utilities, partially offset by lower amortization of intangible assets as a result of fair value adjustments in acquisition accounting at gas marketing services. See Note 2 to the financial statements under "Southern Company Gas" for additional information on infrastructure replacement programs.
Taxes Other Than Income Taxes
Taxes other than income taxes increased $27 million, or 14.7%, in 2018 compared to the prior year. Excluding a $4 million decrease related to the Southern Company Gas Dispositions, taxes other than income taxes increased $31 million. This increase primarily reflects a $13 million increase in revenue tax expenses as a result of higher natural gas revenues, a $12 million increase in Nicor Gas' invested capital tax that reflects a $7 million credit in 2017 to establish a related regulatory asset, and a $4 million increase in property taxes. See Note 15 to the financial statements under "Southern Company Gas" for additional information on the Southern Company Gas Dispositions.
Impairment Charges
A goodwill impairment charge of $42 million was recorded in 2018 in contemplation of the sale of Pivotal Home Solutions. See Notes 1 and 15 to the financial statements under "Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets and Liabilities" and "Southern Company GasSale of Pivotal Home Solutions," respectively, for additional information.
Gain on Dispositions, Net
Gain on dispositions, net was $291 million in 2018 and was associated with the Southern Company Gas Dispositions. The income tax expense on these gains included income tax expense on goodwill not deductible for tax purposes and for which a deferred tax liability had not been recorded previously.
Earnings from Equity Method Investments
Earnings from equity method investments increased $42 million, or 39.6%, in 2018 compared to the prior year. The increase was primarily due to higher earnings from Southern Company Gas' equity method investment in SNG from new rates effective September 2018 and lower operations and maintenance expenses due to the timing of pipeline maintenance. See Note 7 to the financial statements under "Southern Company GasEquity Method Investments" for additional information.
Interest Expense, Net of Amounts Capitalized
Interest expense, net of amounts capitalized increased $28 million, or 14.0%, in 2018 compared to the prior year. The increase was primarily due to $21 million of additional interest expense related to new debt issuances and a $4 million reduction in capitalized interest primarily due to the Dalton Pipeline being placed in service in August 2017.
Other Income (Expense), Net
Other income (expense), net decreased $43 million, or 97.7%, in 2018 compared to the prior year. Excluding a $3 million decrease related to the Southern Company Gas Dispositions, other income (expense), net decreased $40 million. This decrease
Table of ContentsIndex to Financial Statements

MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS (continued)
Southern Company and Subsidiary Companies 2018 Annual Report


was primarily due to a $23 million increase in charitable donations and a $13 million decrease in gains from the settlement of contractor litigation claims. See Note 2 to the financial statements under "Southern Company GasInfrastructure Replacement Programs and Capital Projects– PRP" for additional information on the contractor litigation settlement.
Income Taxes
Income taxes increased $97 million, or 26.4%, in 2018 compared to the prior year. Excluding a $329 million increase related to the Southern Company Gas Dispositions, including tax expense on the goodwill for which a deferred tax liability had not been previously provided, income taxes decreased $232 million. This decrease was primarily due to a lower federal income tax rate and the flowback of excess deferred taxes as a result of the Tax Reform Legislation. In addition, 2017 included additional tax expense of $130 million from the revaluation of deferred tax assets associated with the Tax Reform Legislation, the enactment of the State of Illinois income tax legislation, and new income tax apportionment factors in several states. See Note 10 to the financial statements for additional information.
Other Business Activities
Southern Company's other business activities primarily include the parent company (which does not allocate operating expenses to business units), products; PowerSecure, which was acquired on May 9, 2016 and services in the areas of distributed generation, energy efficiency, and utility infrastructure, and investments in leveraged lease projects and telecommunications. These businesses are classified in general categories and may comprise the following subsidiaries: PowerSecure is a provider of energy solutions, including distributed infrastructure, energy efficiency products and services, in the areas of distributed generation, energy efficiency, and utility infrastructure;infrastructure services, to customers; Southern Company Holdings, Inc. (Southern Holdings), which invests in various projects, including leveraged lease projects; and Southern Linc, which provides digital wireless communications for use by Southern Company and its subsidiary companies and also markets these services to the public and provides fiber optics services within the Southeast.
A condensed statement of income for Southern Company's other business activities follows:
 Amount 
Increase (Decrease)
from Prior Year
 2018 2018 2017
 (in millions)
Operating revenues$1,015
 $444
 $268
Cost of other sales728
 313
 223
Other operations and maintenance273
 69
 9
Depreciation and amortization66
 14
 21
Taxes other than income taxes6
 3
 
Impairment charges12
 12
 
Total operating expenses1,085
 411
 253
Operating income (loss)(70) 33
 15
Interest expense579
 96
 178
Other income (expense), net(23) (23) 30
Income taxes (benefit)(222) 85
 (91)
Net income (loss)$(450) $(171) $(42)
OnIn the table above, the 2018 changes for these other business activities reflect the inclusion of PowerSecure for the year ended December 31, 2018 compared to 2017. The 2017 changes reflect the inclusion of PowerSecure for the 12-month period in 2017 compared to the eight-month period following the acquisition on May 9, 2016, Southern Company acquired all ofwhich is the outstanding stock of PowerSecure for an aggregate purchase price of $429 million. As a result, PowerSecure became a wholly-owned subsidiary of Southern Company.primary variance driver. Additional detailed variance explanations are provided herein. See Note 1215 to the financial statements under "Southern CompanyAcquisition of PowerSecure" for additional information.
Operating Revenues
Southern Company's operating revenues for these other business activities increased $444 million, or 77.8%, in 2018 as compared to the prior year. The increase was primarily related to PowerSecure's storm restoration services in Puerto Rico.
Cost of Other Sales
Cost of other sales for these other business activities increased $313 million, or 75.4% in 2018. The increase was primarily related to PowerSecure's storm restoration services in Puerto Rico.
    Table of Contents                                Index to Financial Statements        

MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS (continued)
Southern Company and Subsidiary Companies 20172018 Annual Report


A condensed statement of income for Southern Company's other business activities follows:
 Amount 
Increase (Decrease)
from Prior Year
 2017 2017 2016
 (in millions)
Operating revenues$571
 $268
 $256
Cost of other sales415
 223
 192
Other operations and maintenance201
 7
 70
Depreciation and amortization52
 21
 17
Taxes other than income taxes3
 
 1
Total operating expenses671
 251
 280
Operating income (loss)(100) 17
 (24)
Interest expense483
 178
 239
Other income (expense), net(3) 28
 (24)
Income taxes (benefit)(307) (91) (84)
Net income (loss)$(279) $(42) $(203)
Operating Revenues
Southern Company's non-electric operating revenues for these other business activities increased $268 million, or 88.4%, in 2017 as compared to the prior year. The increase was primarily the result of the inclusion of PowerSecure results for the 12-month period in 2017 compared to eight months in 2016. Non-electric operating revenues for these other business activities increased $256 million, or 544.7%, in 2016 as compared to the prior year. The increase was primarily related to revenues from products and services following the acquisition of PowerSecure.
Cost of Other Sales
Cost of other sales increased $223 million and $192 million in 2017 and 2016, respectively. These cost increases were primarily related to sales of products and services by PowerSecure, which was acquired on May 9, 2016.
Other Operations and Maintenance Expenses
Other operations and maintenance expenses for these other business activities increased $7$69 million, or 3.6%33.8%, in 2018 as compared to the prior year. The increase was primarily due to PowerSecure's storm restoration services in Puerto Rico and parent company expenses related to the sale of Gulf Power. Other operations and maintenance expenses for these other business activities increased $9 million, or 4.6%, in 2017 as compared to the prior year. The increase was primarily due to a $44 million increase as a result of the inclusion of PowerSecure results for the 12-month period in 2017 compared to eight months in 2016, partially offset by a $35 million decrease in parent company expenses related to the Merger and the acquisition of PowerSecure. Other operations and maintenance expenses
Impairment Charges
Impairment charges for these other business activities increased $70were $12 million or 56.5%, in 2016 as compared to2018. These charges were associated with Southern Linc's tower leases and were recorded in contemplation of the prior year. The increase was primarily due to $47 million in operations and maintenance expenses following the acquisitionsale of PowerSecure and an increase in parent company expenses of $16 million related to the Merger and the acquisition of PowerSecure.Gulf Power.
Interest Expense
Interest expense for these other business activities increased $96 million, or 19.9%, in 2018 as compared to the prior year primarily due to an increase in variable interest rates and average outstanding debt at the parent company. Interest expense for these other business activities increased $178 million, or 58.4%, in 2017 as compared to the prior year primarily due to an increase in average outstanding long-term debt at the parent company. Interest expense for these other business activities increased $239 million, or 362.1%, in 2016 as comparedSee Note 8 to the prior year primarily due to an increase in outstanding long-term debt at the parent company primarily relating to financing a portion of the purchase pricefinancial statements for the Merger.additional information.
Other Income (Expense), Net
Other income (expense), net for these other business activities increased $28decreased $23 million in 20172018 as compared to the prior year. The increase wasyear primarily due to $30 million of expenses incurred in 2016 associated with bridge financingcharitable donations, partially offset by leveraged lease income at Southern Holdings. See Note 1 to the financial statements for the Merger.additional information. Other income (expense), net for these other business activities decreased $24increased $30 million in 20162017 as compared to the prior year. The decrease wasyear primarily due to an increase of $16 million related to theexpenses associated with bridge financing for the Merger.Merger in 2016.
Income Taxes (Benefit)
The income tax benefit for these other business activities decreased $85 million, or 27.7%, in 2018 as compared to the prior year primarily as a result of the Tax Reform Legislation, partially offset by an increase in pre-tax losses at the parent company. The income tax benefit for these other business activities increased $91 million, or 42.1%, in 2017 as compared to the prior year primarily as a result of pre-tax earnings (losses) and net tax benefits related to the Tax Reform Legislation. The income tax benefit
Table of ContentsIndex to Financial Statements

MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS (continued)
Southern Company and Subsidiary Companies 2017 Annual Report


for these other business activities increased $84 million, or 63.6%, in 2016 as compared to the prior year primarily as a result of changes in pre-tax earnings (losses), partially offset by state income tax benefits realized in 2015.
See FUTURE EARNINGS POTENTIAL – "Income Tax MattersFederal Tax Reform Legislation" herein and Note 510 to the financial statements for additional information.
Effects of Inflation
The electric operating companies and natural gas distribution utilities are subject to rate regulation that is generally based on the recovery of historical and projected costs. The effects of inflation can create an economic loss since the recovery of costs could be in dollars that have less purchasing power. Southern Power is party to long-term contracts reflecting market-based rates, including inflation expectations. Any adverse effect of inflation on Southern Company's results of operations has not been substantial in recent years.
FUTURE EARNINGS POTENTIAL
General
The four traditional electric operating companies operate as vertically integrated utilities providing electric service to customers within their service territories in the Southeast. On January 1, 2019, Southern Company completed the sale of Gulf Power, one of the traditional electric operating companies, to NextEra Energy. The seven natural gas distribution utilities provide service to customers in their service territories in Illinois, Georgia, Virginia, New Jersey, Florida, Tennessee, and Maryland.Tennessee. In July 2018, Southern Company Gas completed sales of three of its natural gas distribution utilities. Prices for electricity provided and natural gas distributed to retail customers are set by state PSCs or other applicable state regulatory agencies under cost-based regulatory principles. Retail rates and earnings are reviewed and may be adjusted periodically within certain limitations. Prices for wholesale electricity sales and natural gas distribution, interconnecting transmission lines, and the exchange of electric power are regulated by the FERC. Retail rates and earnings are reviewed and may be adjusted periodically within certain limitations. Southern Power continues to focus on long-term PPAs. In 2018, Southern Power completed sales of noncontrolling interests in entities indirectly owning substantially all of its solar facilities and eight of its wind facilities and also completed sales and entered into an agreement to sell certain of its natural gas plants. See ACCOUNTING POLICIES – "Application of Critical Accounting Policies
Table of ContentsIndex to Financial Statements

MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS (continued)
Southern Company and Subsidiary Companies 2018 Annual Report


and EstimatesUtility Regulation" herein and Note 32 to the financial statements for additional information about regulatory matters. As discussed further herein, in October 2017, a wholly-owned subsidiary of Southern Company Gas entered into agreements for the sale of the assets of two of its natural gas distribution utilities, Elizabethtown Gas and Elkton Gas, to South Jersey Industries, Inc.
The results of operations for the past three years are not necessarily indicative of Southern Company's future earnings potential. Future earnings will be impacted by the 2018 disposition activities described herein and in Note 15 to the financial statements. The level of Southern Company's future earnings depends on numerous factors that affect the opportunities, challenges, and risks of the Southern Company system's primary businesses of selling electricity and distributing natural gas. These factors include the traditional electric operating companies' and the natural gas distribution utilities' ability to maintain a constructive regulatory environmentenvironments that allowsallow for the timely recovery of prudently-incurred costs during a time of increasing costs, continued customer growth, and, limited projected demandfor the traditional electric operating companies, the weak pace of growth over the next several years.in electricity use per customer, especially in residential and commercial markets. Plant Vogtle Units 3 and 4 construction and rate recovery are also major factors. In addition,and the profitability of Southern Power's competitive wholesale business and successful additional investments in renewable and other energy projects are also major factors.
On December 22, 2017, the Tax Reform Legislation was signed into law and became effective on January 1, 2018, which among other things, reduces the federal corporate income tax rate to 21% and changes rates of depreciation and the business interest deduction. See "Income Tax MattersFederal Tax Reform Legislation" and FINANCIAL CONDITION AND LIQUIDITY – "Credit Rating Risk" herein and Notes 3 and 5 to the financial statements for additional information.
Future earnings for the electricity and natural gas businesses will be driven primarily by customer growth. Earnings in the electricity business will also depend upon maintaining and growing sales, considering, among other things, the adoption and/or penetration rates of increasingly energy-efficient technologies, increasing volumes of electronic commerce transactions, and highermore multi-family home construction, all of which could contribute to a net reduction in customer usage. Earnings for both the electricity and natural gas businesses are subject to a variety of other factors. These factors include weather, competition, new energy contracts with other utilities and other wholesale customers, energy conservation practiced by customers, the use of alternative energy sources by customers, the prices of electricity and natural gas, the price elasticity of demand, and the rate of economic growth or decline in the service territory. In addition, the level of future earnings for the wholesale electric business also depends on numerous factors including regulatory matters, creditworthiness of customers, total electric generating capacity available and related costs, future acquisitionsthe development or acquisition of renewable facilities and construction of electric generating facilities, the impact of tax credits from renewableother energy projects, and the successful remarketing of capacity as current contracts expire. Demand for electricity and natural gas is primarily driven by the pace of economic growth that may be affected by changes in regional and global economic conditions, which may impact future earnings. In addition, the volatility of natural gas prices has a significant impact on the natural gas distribution utilities' customer rates, long-term competitive position against other energy sources, and the ability of Southern Company Gas' gas marketing services and wholesale gas services businesses to capture value from locational and
Table of ContentsIndex to Financial Statements

MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS (continued)
Southern Company and Subsidiary Companies 2017 Annual Report


seasonal spreads. Additionally, changes in commodity prices subject a significant portion of Southern Company Gas' operations to earnings variability.
As part of its ongoing effort to adapt to changing market conditions, Southern Company continues to evaluate and consider a wide array of potential business strategies. These strategies may include business combinations, partnerships, and acquisitions involving other utility or non-utility businesses or properties, disposition of certain assets or businesses, internal restructuring, or some combination thereof. Furthermore, Southern Company may engage in new business ventures that arise from competitive and regulatory changes in the utility industry. Pursuit of any of the above strategies, or any combination thereof, may significantly affect the business operations, risks, and financial condition of Southern Company. See Note 12 to the financial statements for additional information regarding Southern Company's recent acquisition and disposition activities.
On October 15, 2017, a wholly-owned subsidiaryJanuary 1, 2019, Southern Company completed the sale of Gulf Power to NextEra Energy for an aggregate cash purchase price of approximately $5.8 billion (less $1.3 billion of indebtedness assumed), subject to customary working capital adjustments. In 2018, net income attributable to Gulf Power was $160 million.
On June 4, 2018, Southern Company Gas entered into agreementscompleted the stock sale of Pivotal Home Solutions to American Water Enterprises LLC for a total cash purchase price of $365 million. On July 1, 2018, a Southern Company Gas subsidiary, Pivotal Utility Holdings, completed the salesales of the assets of two of its natural gas distribution utilities, Elizabethtown Gas and Elkton Gas, to South Jersey Industries, Inc. for a total cash purchase price of $1.7 billion. AsOn July 29, 2018, Southern Company Gas and its wholly-owned direct subsidiary, NUI Corporation, completed the stock sale of December 31, 2017, thePivotal Utility Holdings, which primarily consisted of Florida City Gas, to NextEra Energy for a total cash purchase price of $587 million. The total cash purchase price for each transaction includes final working capital and other adjustments.
The Southern Company Gas Dispositions resulted in a net book valueloss of the assets to be disposed of in the sale was approximately $1.3 billion,$51 million, which includes approximately $0.5 billion$342 million of goodwill.tax expense. The after-tax impacts of these dispositions included income tax expense on goodwill is not deductible for tax purposes and as a result,for which a deferred tax liability hashad not yet been provided. Through the completionrecorded previously. In addition, a goodwill impairment charge of the asset sales, Southern Company Gas intends to invest less than $0.1 billion$42 million was recorded during 2018 in capital additions required for ordinary business operationscontemplation of these assets. The completion of each asset sale is subject to the satisfaction or waiver of certain conditions, including, among other customary closing conditions, the receipt of required regulatory approvals, including the FERC, the Federal Communications Commission, the New Jersey BPU, and, with respect to the sale of Elkton Gas, the Maryland PSC. Southern Company Gas and South Jersey Industries, Inc. made joint filings on DecemberPivotal Home Solutions.
On May 22, 2017 and January 16, 2018, with the New Jersey BPU and the Maryland PSC, respectively, requesting regulatory approval. The asset sales are expected to be completed by the end of the third quarter 2018.
In addition, Southern Power is pursuing the sale ofsold a noncontrolling 33% equity interest in SP Solar, a newly-formed holding company that ownslimited partnership indirectly owning substantially all of Southern Power's solar assets, which, if successful,facilities, for approximately $1.2 billion and, on December 11, 2018, sold a noncontrolling tax equity interest in SP Wind, a holding company owning a portfolio of eight operating wind facilities, for approximately $1.2 billion. Additionally, on November 5, 2018, Southern Power entered into an agreement to sell all of its equity interests in Plant Mankato (including the 385-MW expansion currently under construction) for an aggregate purchase price of approximately $650 million. The completion of the disposition is subject to the expansion unit reaching commercial operation as well as various other customary conditions to closing, including FERC and state commission approvals, and the sale is expected
Table of ContentsIndex to Financial Statements

MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS (continued)
Southern Company and Subsidiary Companies 2018 Annual Report


to close in the middle of 2018.
mid-2019. The ultimate outcome of these mattersthis matter cannot be determined at this time. On December 4, 2018, Southern Power sold of all of its equity interests in the Florida Plants to NextEra Energy for approximately $203 million.
See Note 15 to the financial statements for additional information regarding disposition activities.
Environmental Matters
The Southern Company system's operations are regulated by state and federal environmental agencies through a variety of laws and regulations governing air, water, land, and protection of other natural resources. The Southern Company system maintains a comprehensive environmental compliance strategyand GHG strategies to assess upcoming requirements and compliance costs associated with these environmental laws and regulations. The costs, including capital expenditures, and operations and maintenance costs, and costs reflected in ARO liabilities, required to comply with environmental laws and regulations and to achieve stated goals may impact future electric generating unit retirement and replacement decisions, results of operations, cash flows, andand/or financial condition. ComplianceRelated costs may result from the installation of additional environmental controls, closure and monitoring of CCR facilities, unit retirements, and adding or changing fuel sources for certain existing units, as well as related upgrades to the Southern Company system's transmission system.and distribution (electric and natural gas) systems. A major portion of these compliance costs areis expected to be recovered through existing ratemaking provisions.retail and wholesale rates. The ultimate impact of the environmental laws and regulations and the GHG goals discussed belowherein will depend on various factors, such as state adoption and implementation of requirements, the availability and cost of any deployed control technology, fuel prices, and the outcome of pending and/or future legal challenges.
New or revised environmental laws and regulations could affect many areas of the traditional electric operating companies', Southern Power's, and the natural gas distribution utilities' operations. The impact of any such changes cannot be determined at this time. Environmental compliance costs could affect earnings if such costs cannot continue to be fully recovered in rates on a timely basis for the traditional electric operating companies and the natural gas distribution utilities or through long-term wholesale agreements for the traditional electric operating companies and Southern Power. Further, increased costs that are recovered through regulated rates could contribute to reduced demand for electricity and natural gas, which could negatively affect results of operations, cash flows, andand/or financial condition. Additionally, many commercial and industrial customers may also be affected by existing and future environmental requirements, which for some may have the potential to ultimately affect their demand for electricity and natural gas.
The Southern Company system's commitment to the environment has been demonstrated in many ways, including participating in partnerships resulting in approximately $126$140 million of funding that has restored or enhanced more than 1.72 million acres of habitat since 2003; the removal of more than 1515.5 million pounds of trash and debris from waterways between 2000 and 2018 through the Renew Our Rivers program; a 21%21.2% reduction in surface water withdrawal from 2015 to 2016;2017; reductions in SO2 and NOX air emissions of 95%98% and 85%89%, respectively, since 1990;from 1990 to 2017; the reduction of mercury air emissions of over 90% since 2005;95% from 2005 to 2017; and the Southern Company system's changing energy mix.
Through 2017,2018, the traditional electric operating companies have invested approximately $12.9$14.2 billion in environmental capital retrofit projects to comply with environmental requirements, with annual totals of approximately $1.3 billion, $0.9 billion, and $0.5 billion and
Table of ContentsIndex to Financial Statements

MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS (continued)
Southern Companyfor 2018, 2017, and Subsidiary Companies 2017 Annual Report


$0.9 billion for 2017, 2016, and 2015, respectively. Although the timing, requirements, and estimated costs could change as environmental laws and regulations are adopted or modified, as compliance plans are revised or updated, and as legal challenges to rules are initiated or completed, the Southern Company system's current compliance strategy estimates capital expenditures of $2.8$1.4 billion from 20182019 through 2022,2023, with annual totals of approximately $1.1$0.5 billion, $0.2 billion, $0.3 billion, $0.4 billion, $0.5$0.3 billion, and $0.5$0.2 billion for 2018, 2019, 2020, 2021, 2022, and 2022,2023, respectively. These estimates do not include any potential compliance costs associated with thepending regulation of CO2 emissions from fossil fuel-fired electric generating units. See "Global Climate Issues" herein for additional information. The Southern Company system also anticipates substantial expenditures associated with ash pond closure and ground water monitoring under the Disposal of Coal Combustion Residuals from Electric Utilities rule (CCR Rule),CCR Rule, which are reflected in theSouthern Company's ARO liabilities. See FINANCIAL CONDITION AND LIQUIDITY – "Capital Requirements and Contractual Obligations" herein and Note 16 to the financial statements under "Asset Retirement Obligations and Other Costs of Removal" for additional information.
Environmental Laws and Regulations
Air Quality
The EPA has set National Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS) for six air pollutants (carbon monoxide, lead, nitrogen dioxide, ozone, particulate matter, and SO2), to protect and improve the nation's air quality, which it reviews and revises periodically. RevisionsFollowing a NAAQS revision, states are required to these standardsdevelop an EPA-approved plan to protect air quality. These state plans can require additional emission controls, improvements in control efficiency, or fuel changes which can result in increased compliance and operational costs. NAAQS requirements can also adversely affect the siting of new electric generating facilities. In 2015, the EPA published a more stringent eight-hour ozone NAAQS. The EPA plans to complete designations for this rule by no later than April 30, 2018 and intends to designate an eight-county area within metropolitan Atlanta as nonattainment. No otherAll areas within the Southern Company system's electric service territory have been or are anticipateddesignated as attainment for all NAAQS
Table of ContentsIndex to be designated nonattainment underFinancial Statements

MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS (continued)
Southern Company and Subsidiary Companies 2018 Annual Report


except for a seven-county area within metropolitan Atlanta that is not in attainment with the 2015 ozone NAAQS. InNAAQS and the area surrounding Plant Hammond, in Georgia, which will not be designated attainment or nonattainment for the 2010 the EPA revised the NAAQS for SO2, establishing a new one-hour standard and is completing designations in multiple phases. The EPA has issued several rounds of area designations and no areas in the vicinity of Southern Company system-owned SO2 sources have been designated nonattainment under the 2010 one-hour SO2 NAAQS. However, final eight-hour ozone and SO2 one-hour designations for certain areas are still pending and, if otheruntil December 2020. If areas are designated as nonattainment in the future, increased compliance costs could result. See "Regulatory Matters – Georgia Power – Integrated Resource Plan" herein for information regarding Georgia Power's request to decertify and retire Plant Hammond.
In 2011, the EPA finalized the Cross-State Air Pollution Rule (CSAPR) and its NOX annual, NOX seasonal, and SO2 annual programs. CSAPR is an emissions trading program that addresses theto address impacts of the interstate transport of SO2 and NOX emissions from fossil fuel-fired power plants locatedelectric generating plants. CSAPR establishes emissions trading programs and budgets for certain states and allocates emissions allowances for sources in upwind states in the eastern half of the U.S. on air quality in downwindthose states. The Southern Company system has fossil fuel-fired generation in several states subject to these requirements. In October 2016, the EPA published a final rule that revised the CSAPR seasonal NOX program, establishing more stringent ozone season NOX emissions budgets in Alabama, Mississippi, and Texas. Georgia's ozone season NOX emissions budget remained unchanged. The EPA also removed North Carolina from thethis particular CSAPR NOX seasonal program and completely removed Florida from all CSAPR programs. Georgia's seasonal NOX budget remains unchanged.program. The outcome of ongoing CSAPR litigation concerning the 2016 CSAPR rule, to which Mississippi Power is a party, could have an impact on the State of Mississippi's allowance allocations under the CSAPR seasonalozone season NOX program.emissions budget. Increases in either future fossil fuel-fired generation or the availability or cost of CSAPR allowances could have a negative financial impact on results of operations for Southern Company.
The EPA finalized regional haze regulations in 2005 and 2017. These regulations require states, tribal governments, and various federal agencies to develop and implement plans to reduce pollutants that impair visibility and demonstrate reasonable progress toward the goal of restoring natural visibility conditions in certain areas, including national parks and wilderness areas. States must submit a revised state implementation plan (SIP) to the EPA by July 31, 2021, demonstrating continued reasonable progress towards achieving visibility improvement goals. State implementation of reasonable progressThese plans could require further reductions in certain pollutants, such as particulate matter, SO2 or, and NOX emissions,, which could result in increased compliance costs.
In 2015, The EPA approved the EPA publishedregional progress SIPs for the States of Alabama and Georgia, but only issued a final rule requiring certain states (including Alabama, Florida, Georgia,limited approval of the regional progress SIP for the State of Mississippi North Carolina, and Texas) tobecause Mississippi must revise or remove the best available retrofit technology (BART) provisions of their SIPs regulating excess emissions at industrial facilities, includingits SIP. Therefore, Mississippi Power's Plant Daniel is the only electric generating facilities, during periods of startup, shut-down, or malfunction (SSM). The state excess emission rules provide necessary operational flexibility to affected units during periods of SSM and, if removed, could affect unit availability and result in increased operations and maintenance costs for the Southern Company system. The EPA has not yet respondedsystem that continues to be evaluated under the regional haze BART provisions. Mississippi Power is required to submit Plant Daniel's BART analysis to the SIP revisions proposedState of Mississippi by states within the Southern Company system's traditional electric service territory.summer 2019. Requirements for further reduction of these pollutants at Plant Daniel could increase compliance costs.
Water Quality
In 2014, the EPA finalized requirements under Section 316(b) of the Clean Water Act (CWA) to regulate cooling water intake structures at existing power plants and manufacturing facilities in order(CWIS) to minimize their effects on fish and other aquatic life.life at existing power plants (e.g. coal, natural gas, oil, and nuclear generating plants) and manufacturing facilities. The regulation requires plant-specific studies to determine applicable measuresCWIS changes to protect organisms that either get caught on the
Table of ContentsIndex to Financial Statements

MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS (continued)
Southern Company and Subsidiary Companies 2017 Annual Report


intake screens (impingement) or are drawn into the cooling system (entrainment). The Southern Company system is conducting these studies and currently anticipates applicable CWIS changes may include fish-friendly CWIS screens with fish return systems and minor additions of monitoring equipment at certain plants. However, the ultimate impact of this rule will depend on the outcome of these plant-specific studies, and any additional protective measures required to be incorporated into each plant's National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit based on site-specific factors.factors, and the outcome of any legal challenges.
In 2015, the EPA finalized the steam electric effluent limitations guidelines (ELG) rule (2015 ELG Rule) that set national standards for wastewater discharges from new and existing steam electric generating units.units generating greater than 50 MWs. The rule2015 ELG Rule prohibits effluent discharges of certain wastestreamswaste streams and imposes stringent arsenic, mercury, selenium, and nitrate/nitrite limits on scrubberflue gas desulfurization (scrubber) wastewater discharges. The revised technology-based limits and compliance dates maythe CCR Rule require extensive modificationschanges to existing ash and wastewater management systems or the installation and operation of new ash and wastewater management systems. Compliance with the 2015 ELG ruleRule is expected to require capital expenditures and increased operational costs primarily affectingfor the traditional electric operating companies' coal-fired electric generation. Compliance applicability dates range from November 1, 2018 to December 31, 2023 with stateState environmental agencies incorporatingwill incorporate specific compliance applicability dates in the NPDES permitting process based on information provided for each ELG waste stream.stream no later than December 31, 2023. The EPA has committedis scheduled to issue a new rulemaking by December 2019 that could potentially revise the limitations and applicability dates of two of the waste streams regulated in the 2015 ELG rule.Rule. The EPA expectsimpact of any changes to finalize this rulemaking in 2020.the 2015 ELG Rule will depend on the content of the new rule and the outcome of any legal challenges.
In 2015, the EPA and the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (Corps) jointly published a final rule that revised the regulatory definition of waters of the United States (WOTUS) for all CWA programs. The rule significantly expanded the scope of federal jurisdiction over waterbodies (such as rivers, streams, canals, and canals)wastewater treatment ponds), which could impact new generation projects and permitting and reporting requirements associated with the installation, expansion, and maintenance of transmission, distribution, and pipeline projects. On July 27, 2017, theThe EPA and the Corps proposedare expected to rescindpublish a final rule in 2019 to replace the 2015 WOTUS rule.definition. The WOTUS rule has been stayed by the U.S. Courtimpact of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit since late 2015, but on January 22, 2018, the U.S. Supreme Court determined that federal district courts have jurisdiction over the pending challengesany changes to the rule. On February 6, 2018, the EPA and the Corps published a final rule delaying implementation of the 2015 WOTUS rule will depend on the content of this final rule and the outcome of any legal challenges.
Table of ContentsIndex to 2020.Financial Statements

MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS (continued)
Southern Company and Subsidiary Companies 2018 Annual Report


Coal Combustion Residuals
In 2015, the EPA finalized non-hazardous solid waste regulations for the disposal of CCR, including coal ash and gypsum, in landfills and surface impoundments (CCR units)(ash ponds) at active generating power plants. In addition to the EPA's CCR Rule, the States of Alabama and Georgia have also finalized regulations regarding the handling of CCR within their respective states. The EPA's CCR Rule requires CCR unitslandfills and ash ponds to be evaluated against a set of performance criteria and potentially closed if minimum criteria are not met. Closure of existing CCR unitslandfills and ash ponds could require installation of equipment and infrastructure to manage CCR in accordance with the rule. The EPA has announced plans to reconsider certain portions of the CCR Rule by no later than December 2019, which could result in changes to deadlines and corrective action requirements.
The EPA's reconsideration of the CCR Rule is due in part to a legislative development that impacts the potential oversight role of state agencies. Under the Water Infrastructure Improvements for the Nation Act, which became law in 2016, states are allowed to establish permit programs for implementing the CCR Rule. The Georgia Department of Natural Resources has incorporated the requirements of the CCR Rule into its solid waste regulations, which established additional requirements for all of Georgia Power's CCR units, and has requested that the EPA approve its state permitting program. The other states in the Southern Company system's electric service territory have not yet submitted plans to the EPA.
Based on cost estimates for closure and monitoring of landfills and ash ponds pursuant to the CCR Rule, the Southern Company system recorded AROs for each CCR unit in 2015. As further analysis iswas performed and closure details arewere developed, the traditional electric operating companies will continuehave continued to periodically update these cost estimates, as necessary.discussed further below.
The EPA published certain amendments to the CCR Rule, which became effective August 29, 2018. These amendments extend the date from April 2019 to October 31, 2020 to cease sending CCR and other waste streams to ash ponds that demonstrate compliance with all except two of the specified performance criteria.
On August 21, 2018, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit issued a decision suggesting the EPA should regulate previously-excluded inactive ash ponds located at retired generation facilities and questioning both the ability of unlined ash ponds to continue operating no matter the performance criteria results and the classification of clay-lined landfills and ash ponds. These developments could impact the expected timing of the traditional electric operating companies' landfill and ash pond closure activities, but the extent of any impact will depend on the outcome of ongoing litigation, anticipated EPA rulemaking action to establish further guidance, and the outcome of any legal challenges.
In June 2018, Alabama Power recorded an increase of approximately $1.2 billion to its AROs related to the CCR Rule. The revised cost estimates were based on information from feasibility studies performed on ash ponds in use at plants operated by Alabama Power, including at a plant jointly-owned by Mississippi Power. During the second quarter 2018, Alabama Power's management completed its analysis of these studies which indicated that additional closure costs, primarily related to increases in estimated ash volume, water management requirements, and design revisions, will be required to close these ash ponds under the planned closure-in-place methodology. As the level of work becomes more defined in the next 12 months, it is likely that these cost estimates will change and the change could be material.
In December 2018, Georgia Power recorded an increase of approximately $3.1 billion to its AROs related to the CCR Rule and the related state rule. During the second half of 2018, Georgia Power completed a strategic assessment related to its plans to close the ash ponds at all of its generating plants in compliance with the CCR Rule and the related state rule. This assessment included engineering and constructability studies related to design assumptions for ash pond closures and advanced engineering methods. The results indicated that additional closure costs will be required to close these ash ponds, primarily due to changes in closure strategies, the estimated amount of ash to be excavated, and additional water management requirements necessary to support closure strategies. These factors also impact the estimated timing of future cash outlays.
The traditional electric operating companies expect to periodically update their ARO cost estimates. Absent continued recovery of ARO costs through regulated rates, Southern Company's results of operations, cash flows, and financial condition could be materially impacted. See FINANCIAL CONDITION AND LIQUIDITY – "Capital Requirements and Contractual Obligations" herein and Note 16 to the financial statements under "Asset Retirement Obligations and Other Costs of Removal" for additional information regarding information.
The ultimate outcome of these matters cannot be determined at this time.
Nuclear Decommissioning
In June 2018, Alabama Power completed an updated decommissioning cost site study for Plant Farley. The estimated cost of decommissioning based on the study resulted in an increase in Alabama Power's ARO liability of approximately $300 million. Amounts previously contributed to Alabama Power's external trust funds are currently projected to be adequate to meet the updated decommissioning obligations.
In December 2018, Georgia Power completed updated decommissioning cost site studies for Plant Hatch and Plant Vogtle Units 1 and 2. The estimated cost of decommissioning based on the studies resulted in an increase in Georgia Power's ARO liability of approximately $130 million. Georgia Power currently collects $4 million and $2 million annually in rates, which is used to fund external nuclear decommissioning trusts for Plant Hatch and Plant Vogtle Units 1 and 2, respectively. Georgia Power expects the Georgia PSC to review and adjust, if necessary, these amounts in the Georgia Power 2019 Base Rate Case.
See Note 6 to the financial statements for additional information.
Table of ContentsIndex to Financial Statements

MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS (continued)
Southern Company's AROs as of December 31, 2017.Company and Subsidiary Companies 2018 Annual Report


Environmental Remediation
The Southern Company system must comply with environmental laws and regulations governing the handling and disposal of waste and releases of hazardous substances. Under these various laws and regulations, the Southern Company system could incur substantial costs to clean up affected sites. The traditional electric operating companies and Southern Company Gasthe natural gas distribution utilities conduct studies to determine the extent of any required cleanup and Southern Company has recognized the estimated costs to clean up known impacted sites in its financial statements. Amounts for cleanup and ongoing monitoring costs were not material for any year presented. The traditional electric operating companies and the natural gas distribution utilities in Illinois New Jersey,and Georgia and Florida have all received authority from their respective state PSCs or other applicable state regulatory agencies to recover approved environmental compliance costs through regulatory mechanisms. These regulatory mechanisms are adjusted annually or as necessary within limits approved by the state PSCs or other applicable state regulatory agencies. The traditional electric operating companies and Southern Company Gas may be liable for some or all required cleanup costs for additional sites
Table of ContentsIndex to Financial Statements

MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS (continued)
Southern Company and Subsidiary Companies 2017 Annual Report


that may require environmental remediation. See Note 3 to the financial statements under "Environmental MattersEnvironmental Remediation" for additional information.
Global Climate Issues
In 2015,On August 31, 2018, the EPA published final rules limitinga proposed rule known as the Affordable Clean Energy (ACE) Rule, which is intended to replace a regulation enacted in 2015 known as the Clean Power Plan (CPP), that would limit CO2 emissions from new, modified, and reconstructedexisting fossil fuel-fired electric generating units and guidelines for states to develop plans to meet EPA-mandated CO2 emission performance standards for existing units (known as the Clean Power Plan or CPP). In February 2016,units. The CPP has been stayed by the U.S. Supreme Court granted a staysince 2016. The ACE Rule would require states to develop GHG unit-specific emission rate standards based on heat-rate efficiency improvements for existing fossil fuel-fired steam units. As proposed, combustion turbines, including natural gas combined cycles, are not affected sources. As of January 1, 2019, the CPP,Southern Company system has ownership interests in 40 fossil fuel-fired steam units to which the proposed ACE Rule is applicable. The ultimate impact of this rule to the Southern Company system is currently unknown and will remain in effect throughdepend on changes between the resolution of litigation inproposal and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia challenging the legality of the CPPfinal rule, subsequent state plan developments and requirements, and any review by the U.S. Supreme Court. associated legal challenges.
On March 28, 2017, the U.S. President signed an executive order directing agencies to review actions that potentially burden the development or use of domestically produced energy resources, including review of the CPP and other CO2 emissions rules. On October 10, 2017,December 20, 2018, the EPA published a proposed review of the Standards of Performance for Greenhouse Gas Emissions from New, Modified, and Reconstructed Stationary Sources: Electric Utility Generating Units final rule to repeal(2015 NSPS rule). The EPA's final 2015 NSPS rule set standards of performance for new, modified, and reconstructed electric utility generating units which included stationary combustion turbines and fossil-fired steam boilers. This proposal reduces the CPPstringency of the 2015 NSPS rule by not basing the new and reconstructed fossil-fired steam boiler and IGCC standards on December 28, 2017, published an advanced notice of proposed rulemaking regarding a CPP replacement rule.
In 2015, parties to the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change, including the United States, adopted the Paris Agreement, which established a non-binding universal framework for addressing greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions based on nationally determined contributions. On June 1, 2017, the U.S. President announced that the United States would withdraw from the Paris Agreementpartial carbon capture and begin renegotiating its terms.sequestration. The ultimate impact of any changes to this agreement orrule will depend on the content of the final rule and the outcome of any renegotiated agreement depends on its implementation by participating countries.legal challenges.
DomesticAdditional domestic GHG policies may emerge in the future requiring the United States to transition to a lower GHG emitting economy. The Southern Company system has transitioned from an electric generating mix of 71%70% coal and 11%15% natural gas in 20052007 to a mix of 30% percent coal and 46% natural gas mix in 2017 and currently includes2018, along with over 8,000 MWs of renewable projects. In addition,resources. This transition has been supported in part by the Southern Company system has retiredretiring 4,226 MWs of coal- and oil-fired generating capacity since 2010 and convertedconverting 3,280 MWs of generating capacity from coal to natural gas since 2015. In addition, Southern Company Gas has replaced 5,300approximately 5,600 miles of bare steel and cast-iron pipe, resulting in removal of approximately 2.5 million metric tons of GHG from its natural gas distribution system since 1998. Based on ownership or financial control of facilities, the Southern Company system's 20162017 GHG emissions (CO2 equivalent) were approximately 9998 million metric tons, with 20172018 emissions estimated at 9698 million metric tons. This equates to a reduction of 27%36% between 20052007 and 20162018. The 2018 estimates include GHG emissions attributable to each of Elizabethtown Gas, Elkton Gas, Florida City Gas, and the Florida Plants through the date of the applicable disposition. See Note 15 to the financial statements for additional information regarding disposition activities.
In April 2018, Southern Company established an intermediate goal of a 50% reduction in carbon emissions from 2007 levels by 2030 and a preliminary estimatelong-term goal of 30% through 2017.low- to no-carbon operations by 2050. To better represent GHG emission reductions,achieve these goals, the Southern Company system is transitioningexpects to a maximum emission baseline yearcontinue growing its renewable energy portfolio, optimize technology advancements to modernize its transmission and distribution systems, increase the use of 2007natural gas for generation, complete ongoing construction projects, including Georgia Power's interest in Plant Vogtle Units 3 and a baseline calculation methodology consistent with4, invest in energy efficiency, and continue research and development efforts focused on technologies to lower GHG emissions. The Southern Company system's ability to achieve these goals also will be dependent on many external factors, including supportive national energy policies, low natural gas prices, and the EPA's Greenhouse Gas Reporting Program methodology. On a preliminary basis, these baseline adjustments result in an estimated GHG emission reductiondevelopment, deployment, and advancement of 36% from 2007 through 2017.
FERC Matters
Market-Based Rate Authority
The traditional electric operating companies and Southern Power have authority from the FERC to sell electricity at market-based rates. Since 2008, that authority, for certain balancing authority areas, has been conditioned on compliance with the requirements of anrelevant energy auction, which the FERC found to be tailored mitigation that addresses potential market power concerns. In accordance with FERC regulations governing such authority, the traditional electric operating companies and Southern Power filed a triennial market power analysis in 2014, which included continued reliance on the energy auction as tailored mitigation. In 2015, the FERC issued an order finding that the traditional electric operating companies' and Southern Power's existing tailored mitigation may not effectively mitigate the potential to exert market power in certain areas served by the traditional electric operating companies and in some adjacent areas. The FERC directed the traditional electric operating companies and Southern Power to show why market-based rate authority should not be revoked in these areas or to provide a mitigation plan to further address market power concerns. The traditional electric operating companies and Southern Power filed a request for rehearing and filed their response with the FERC in 2015.
In December 2016, the traditional electric operating companies and Southern Power filed an amendment to their market-based rate tariff that proposed certain changes to the energy auction, as well as several non-tariff changes. On February 2, 2017, the FERC issued an order accepting all such changes subject to an additional condition of cost-based price caps for certain sales outside of the energy auction, finding that all of these changes would provide adequate alternative mitigation for the traditional electric operating companies' and Southern Power's potential to exert market power in certain areas served by the traditional electric operating companies and in some adjacent areas. On May 17, 2017, the FERC accepted the traditional electric operating companies' and Southern Power's compliance filing accepting the terms of the order. While the FERC's February 2, 2017 order references the market power proceeding discussed above, it remains a separate, ongoing matter.technologies.
    Table of Contents                                Index to Financial Statements        

MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS (continued)
Southern Company and Subsidiary Companies 20172018 Annual Report


FERC Matters
Open Access Transmission Tariff
On October 25, 2017,May 10, 2018, AMEA and Cooperative Energy filed with the FERC a complaint against SCS and the traditional electric operating companies claiming that the current 11.25% base ROE used in calculating the annual transmission revenue requirements of the traditional electric operating companies' open access transmission tariff is unjust and unreasonable as measured by the applicable FERC standards. The complaint requested that the base ROE be set no higher than 8.65% and that the FERC order refunds for the difference in revenue requirements that results from applying a just and reasonable ROE established in this proceeding upon determining the current ROE is unjust and unreasonable. On June 18, 2018, SCS and the traditional electric operating companies filed their response challenging the adequacy of the showing presented by the complainants and offering support for the current ROE. On September 6, 2018, the FERC issued an order establishing a refund effective date of May 10, 2018 in responsethe event a refund is due and initiating an investigation and settlement procedures regarding the current base ROE. Through December 31, 2018, the estimated maximum potential refund is not expected to the traditional electric operating companies' andbe material to Southern Power's June 29, 2017 triennial updated market power analysis. The FERC directed the traditional electric operating companies and Southern Power to show cause within 60 days why market-based rate authority should not be revoked in certain areas adjacent to the area presently under mitigation in accordance with the February 2, 2017 orderCompany's results of operations or to provide a mitigation plan to further address market power concerns. On November 10, 2017, the traditional electric operating companies and Southern Power responded to the FERC and proposed to resolve matters by applying the alternative mitigation authorized by the February 2, 2017 order to the adjacent areas made the subject of the October 25, 2017 order.
cash flows. The ultimate outcome of these mattersthis matter cannot be determined at this time.
Southern Company Gas
At December 31, 2017, Southern Company Gas' midstream operationsgas pipeline investments business wasis involved in two gassignificant pipeline construction projects, the Atlantic Coast Pipeline project(5% ownership) and the PennEast Pipeline project,(20% ownership), which received FERC approval in October 2017 and January 2018, respectively. Southern Company Gas' portion of the expectedtotal capital expenditures, excluding AFUDC, at completion are expected to be between $350 million and $390 million for these projects total approximately $586 million.the Atlantic Coast Pipeline and $276 million for the PennEast Pipeline. These projects, along with Southern Company Gas' existing pipelines, are intended to provide diverse sources of natural gas supplies to customers, resolve current and long-term supply planning for new capacity, enhance system reliability, and generate economic development in the areas served.
On August 1, 2017,Work continues with state and federal agencies to obtain the Daltonrequired permits to begin construction on the PennEast Pipeline. Any material delays may impact forecasted capital expenditures and the expected in-service date.
The Atlantic Coast Pipeline has experienced challenges to its permits since construction began in 2018. During the third and fourth quarters 2018, a FERC stop work order, together with delays in obtaining permits necessary for construction and construction delays due to judicial actions, impacted the cost and schedule for the project. As a result, total project cost estimates have increased from between $6.0 billion and $6.5 billion to between $7.0 billion and $7.8 billion, excluding financing costs. Southern Company Gas' share of the total project costs is 5% and Southern Company Gas' investment at December 31, 2018 totaled $83 million. The operator of the joint venture currently expects to achieve a late 2020 in-service date for at least key segments of the Atlantic Coast Pipeline, while the remainder may extend into early 2021. Southern Company Gas has evaluated the recoverability of its investment and determined there was placedno impairment as of December 31, 2018. Abnormal weather, work delays (including due to judicial or regulatory action), and other conditions may result in service as authorized by the FERCadditional cost or schedule modifications, which could result in an impairment of Southern Company Gas' investment and transportation service for customers commenced.could have a material impact on Southern Company's financial statements.
The ultimate outcome of these matters cannot be determined at this time. See Note 4Notes 7 and 9 to the financial statements under "Southern Company GasEquity Method Investments" and "Guarantees," respectively, for additional information.information on these pipeline projects.
Regulatory Matters
Alabama Power
Alabama Power's revenues from regulated retail operations are collected through various rate mechanisms subject to the oversight of the Alabama PSC. Alabama Power currently recovers its costs from the regulated retail business primarily through Rate RSE, Rate CNP, Rate ECR, and Rate NDR. In addition, the Alabama PSC issues accounting orders to address current events impacting Alabama Power. See Note 32 to the financial statements under "Regulatory MattersAlabama Power" for additional information regarding Alabama Power's rate mechanisms and accounting orders.
Rate RSE
The Alabama PSC has adopted Rate RSE that provides for periodic annual adjustments based upon Alabama Power's projected weighted cost ofcommon equity (WCE)return (WCER) compared to an allowable range. Rate RSE adjustments are based on forward-looking information for the applicable upcoming calendar year. Rate RSE adjustments for any two-year period, when averaged together, cannot exceed 4.0% and any annual adjustment is limited to 5.0%. When the projected WCER is under the allowed range, there is
Table of ContentsIndex to Financial Statements

MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS (continued)
Southern Company and Subsidiary Companies 2018 Annual Report


an adjusting point of 5.98% and eligibility for a performance-based adder of seven basis points, or 0.07%, to the WCER adjusting point if Alabama Power (i) has an "A" credit rating equivalent with at least one of the recognized rating agencies or (ii) is in the top one-third of a designated customer value benchmark survey. If Alabama Power's actual retail return is above the allowed WCEWCER range, the excess will be refunded to customers unless otherwise directed by the Alabama PSC; however, there is no provision for additional customer billings should the actual retail return fall below the WCEWCER range. Prior to January 2019, retail rates remained unchanged when the WCER range was between 5.75% and 6.21%.
On May 1, 2018, the Alabama PSC approved modifications to Rate RSE and other commitments designed to position Alabama Power to address the growing pressure on its credit quality resulting from the Tax Reform Legislation, without increasing retail rates under Rate RSE in the near term. Alabama Power plans to reduce growth in total debt by increasing equity, with corresponding reductions in debt issuances, thereby de-leveraging its capital structure. Alabama Power's goal is to achieve an equity ratio of approximately 55% by the end of 2025. At December 31, 2016,2018, Alabama Power's retail return exceededequity ratio was approximately 47%.
The approved modifications to Rate RSE began for billings in January 2019. The modifications include reducing the top of the allowed WCEWCER range which resulted infrom 6.21% to 6.15% and modifications to the refund mechanism applicable to prior year actual results. The modifications to the refund mechanism allow Alabama Power establishingto retain a $73 million Rate RSE refund liability. In accordance with an Alabama PSC order issued on February 14, 2017, Alabama Power applied the full amountportion of the refundrevenue that causes the actual WCER for a given year to reduceexceed the under recovered balance of Rate CNP PPA as discussed further below.allowed range.
Effective in January 2017, Rate RSE increased 4.48%, or $245 million annually. At December 31, 2017,Generally, if Alabama Power's actual retailWCER is between 6.15% and 7.65%, customers will receive 25% of the amount between 6.15% and 6.65%, 40% of the amount between 6.65% and 7.15%, and 75% of the amount between 7.15% and 7.65%. Customers will receive all amounts in excess of an actual WCER of 7.65%.
In conjunction with these modifications to Rate RSE, on May 8, 2018, Alabama Power consented to a moratorium on any upward adjustments under Rate RSE for 2019 and 2020 and will also return was within the allowed WCE range. $50 million to customers through bill credits in 2019.
On December 1, 2017,November 30, 2018, Alabama Power made its required annual Rate RSE submission to the Alabama PSC of projected data for calendar year 2018.2019. Projected earnings were within the specified range; therefore, retail rates under Rate RSE remainedremain unchanged for 2018.2019.
In conjunction withAt December 31, 2018, Alabama Power's retail return exceeded the allowed WCER range, which resulted in Alabama Power establishing a regulatory liability of $109 million for Rate RSE refunds. In accordance with an Alabama PSC order issued on February 5, 2019, Alabama Power has an established retail tariff that provides for an adjustmentwill apply $75 million to customer billingsreduce the Rate ECR under recovered balance and the remaining $34 million will be refunded to recognize the impact of a changecustomers through bill credits in the statutory income tax rate. As a result of Tax Reform Legislation, the application of this tariff would reduce annual retail revenue by approximately $250 million over the remainder of 2018. The ultimate outcome of this matter cannot be determined at this time.July through September 2019.
Rate CNP PPA
Alabama Power's retail rates, approved by the Alabama PSC, provide for adjustments under Rate CNP to recognize the placing of new generating facilities into retail service. Alabama Power may also recover retail costs associated with certificated PPAs under Rate CNP PPA. On March 7, 2017, the Alabama PSC issued a consent order that Alabama Power leave in effect the current Rate
Table of ContentsIndex to Financial Statements

MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS (continued)
Southern Company and Subsidiary Companies 2017 Annual Report


CNP PPA factor for billings for the period April 1, 2017 through March 31, 2018. No adjustmentadjustments to Rate CNP PPA occurred during the period 2016 through 2018 and no adjustment is expected in 2018.2019.
In accordance with an accounting order issued onin February 17, 2017 by the Alabama PSC, Alabama Power eliminatedreclassified $69 million of the under recovered balance in Rate CNP PPA at December 31, 2016 which totaled approximately $142 million. As discussed herein under "Rate RSE," Alabama Power utilized the full amount of its $73 million Rate RSE refund liability to reduce the amount of the Rate CNP PPA under recovery and reclassified the remaining $69 millionrecovered balance to a separate regulatory asset. The amortization of the new regulatory asset through Rate RSE will begin concurrently with the effective date of Alabama Power's next depreciation study, which is expected to occur within the next two to four years. Alabama Power's current depreciation study became effective January 1, 2017.no later than 2022.
Rate CNP Compliance
Rate CNP Compliance allows for the recovery of Alabama Power's retail costs associated with laws, regulations, and other such mandates directed at the utility industry involving the environment, security, reliability, safety, sustainability, or similar considerations impacting Alabama Power's facilities or operations. Rate CNP Compliance is based on forward-looking information and provides for the recovery of these costs pursuant to a factor that is calculated annually. Compliance costs to be recovered include operations and maintenance expenses, depreciation, and a return on certain invested capital. Revenues for Rate CNP Compliance, as recorded on the financial statements, are adjusted for differences in actual recoverable costs and amounts billed in current regulated rates. Accordingly, changes in the billing factor will have no significant effect on revenues or net income, but will affect annual cash flow. Changes in Rate CNP Compliance-related operations and maintenance expenses and depreciation generally will have no effect on net income.
In accordance with an accounting order issued onin February 17, 2017 by the Alabama PSC, Alabama Power reclassified $36 million of its under recovered balance in Rate CNP Compliance to a separate regulatory asset. The amortization of the new regulatory asset
Table of ContentsIndex to Financial Statements

MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS (continued)
Southern Company and Subsidiary Companies 2018 Annual Report


through Rate RSE will begin concurrently with the effective date of Alabama Power's next depreciation study, which is expected to occur within the next two to four years. Alabama Power's current depreciation study became effective January 1, 2017.no later than 2022.
On November 30, 2018, Alabama Power submitted calculations associated with its cost of complying with environmental mandates, as provided under Rate CNP Compliance. The filing reflected a projected unrecovered retail revenue requirement for environmental compliance of approximately $205 million, which is being recovered in the billing months of January 2019 through December 5, 2017,2019.
Tax Reform Accounting Order
On May 1, 2018, the Alabama PSC issued a consentapproved an accounting order that authorized Alabama Power leave in effect for 2018to defer the factorsbenefits of federal excess deferred income taxes associated with Alabama Power's compliance coststhe Tax Reform Legislation for the year 2017, with any under-collected amount for prior years deemed recovered before any current year amounts. Anyended December 31, 2018 as a regulatory liability and to use up to $30 million of such deferrals to offset under recovered amounts associated withunder Rate ECR. The estimated deferrals for the year ended December 31, 2018 willtotaled approximately $63 million, subject to adjustment following the filing of the 2018 tax return, of which $30 million was used to offset the Rate ECR under recovered balance and $33 million is recorded in other regulatory liabilities, deferred on the balance sheet to be reflected inused for the 2019 filing.benefit of customers as determined by the Alabama PSC at a future date. See Note 10 to the financial statements under "Current and Deferred Income Taxes" for additional information.
Environmental Accounting Order
Based on an order from the Alabama PSC (Environmental Accounting Order), Alabama Power is allowed to establish a regulatory asset to record the unrecovered investment costs, including the unrecovered plant asset balance and the unrecovered costs associated with site removal and closure associated with future unit retirements caused by environmental regulations. The regulatory asset will beis being amortized and recovered over the affected unit's remaining useful life, as established prior to the decision regarding early retirement through Rate CNP Compliance. At December 31, 2018, this regulatory asset had a balance of $42 million. See "Environmental MattersEnvironmental Laws and Regulations" herein for additional information regarding environmental regulations.
Subsequent to December 31, 2018, Alabama Power determined that Plant Gorgas Units 8, 9, and 10 (approximately 1,000 MWs) will be retired by April 15, 2019 due to the expected costs of compliance with federal and state environmental regulations. In accordance with the Environmental Accounting Order, approximately $740 million of net investment costs will be transferred to a regulatory asset at the retirement date and recovered over the affected units' remaining useful lives, as established prior to the decision to retire.
Georgia Power
Georgia Power's revenues from regulated retail operations are collected through various rate mechanisms subject to the oversight of the Georgia PSC. Georgia Power currently recovers its costs from the regulated retail business through the 2013 ARP, which includes traditional base tariff rates, Demand-Side Management (DSM) tariffs, Environmental Compliance Cost Recovery (ECCR) tariffs, and Municipal Franchise Fee (MFF) tariffs. Georgia Power is scheduled to file a base rate case by July 1, 2019, which may continue or modify these tariffs. In addition, financing costs on certified projectconstruction costs related to the construction of Plant Vogtle Units 3 and 4 are being collected through the NCCR tariff and fuel costs are collected through a separate fuel cost recovery tariff. See Note 32 to the financial statements under "Regulatory MattersGeorgia Power" for additional information.
Rate Plans
Pursuant to the terms and conditions of a settlement agreement related to Southern Company's acquisition of Southern Company Gas approved by the Georgia PSC in April 2016, the 2013 ARP will continue in effect until December 31, 2019, and Georgia Power will be required to file its next base rate case by July 1, 2019. Furthermore, through December 31, 2019, Georgia Power and Atlanta Gas Light Company each will retain their respectiveits merger savings, net of transition costs, as defined in the settlement agreement; through December 31, 2022, such net merger savings applicable to each will be shared on a 60/40 basis with their respective customers; thereafter, all merger savings will be retained by customers. See Note 3 to the financial
Table of ContentsIndex to Financial Statements

MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS (continued)
Southern Company and Subsidiary Companies 2017 Annual Report


statements under "Regulatory MattersGeorgia PowerRate Plans" for additional information regarding the 2013 ARP and Note 1215 to the financial statements under "Southern CompanyMerger with Southern Company Gas" for additional information regarding the Merger.
In accordance with the 2013 ARP, the Georgia PSC approved increases to tariffs effective January 1, 2016 as follows: (1) traditional base tariff rates by approximately $49 million; (2) ECCR tariff by approximately $75 million; (3) DSM tariffs by approximately $3 million; and (4) MFF tariff by approximately $13 million, for a total increase in base revenues of approximately $140 million. There were no changes to theseGeorgia Power's traditional base tariff rates, ECCR tariff, DSM tariffs, or MFF tariff in 2017.2017 or 2018.
Under the 2013 ARP, Georgia Power's retail ROE is set at 10.95% and earnings are evaluated against a retail ROE range of 10.00% to 12.00%. Two-thirds of any earnings above 12.00% will be directly refunded to customers, with the remaining one-third retained by Georgia Power. There will be no recovery of any earnings shortfall below 10.00% on an actual basis. In 2015, Georgia Power's retail ROE was within the allowed retail ROE range. In 2016, Georgia Power's retail ROE exceeded 12.00%, and Georgia Power will refundrefunded to retail customers approximately $44 million in 2018 approximately $40 million as approved by the Georgia PSC. On February 5, 2019, the Georgia PSC on January 16, 2018. In 2017,approved a settlement between Georgia Power and the staff
Table of ContentsIndex to Financial Statements

MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS (continued)
Southern Company and Subsidiary Companies 2018 Annual Report


of the Georgia PSC under which Georgia Power's retail ROE for 2017 was within the allowedstipulated to exceed 12.00% and Georgia Power will reduce certain regulatory assets by approximately $4 million in lieu of providing refunds to retail customers. In 2018, Georgia Power's retail ROE range,exceeded 12.00%, and Georgia Power accrued approximately $100 million to refund to retail customers, subject to review and approval by the Georgia PSC.
On January 19,April 3, 2018, the Georgia PSC issued an order onapproved the Georgia Power Tax Reform Legislation, which was amended on February 16, 2018 (Tax Order). In accordance withSettlement Agreement. Pursuant to the Tax Order, Georgia Power is requiredTax Reform Settlement Agreement, to submit its analysisreflect the federal income tax rate reduction impact of the Tax Reform Legislation, Georgia Power will refund to customers a total of $330 million through bill credits. Georgia Power issued bill credits of approximately $130 million in 2018 and related recommendationswill issue bill credits of approximately $95 million in June 2019 and $105 million in February 2020. In addition, Georgia Power is deferring as a regulatory liability (i) the revenue equivalent of the tax expense reduction resulting from legislation lowering the Georgia state income tax rate from 6.00% to address5.75% in 2019 and (ii) the entire benefit of federal and state excess accumulated deferred income taxes, which is expected to total approximately $700 million at December 31, 2019. At December 31, 2018, the related impacts onregulatory liability balance totaled $610 million. The amortization of these regulatory liabilities is expected to be addressed in the Georgia Power 2019 Base Rate Case. If there is not a base rate case in 2019, customers will receive $185 million in annual bill credits beginning in 2020, with any additional federal and state income tax savings deferred as a regulatory liability, until Georgia Power's costnext base rate case.
To address some of servicethe negative cash flow and annual revenue requirementscredit quality impacts of the Tax Reform Legislation, the Georgia PSC also approved an increase in Georgia Power's retail equity ratio to the lower of (i) Georgia Power's actual common equity weight in its capital structure or (ii) 55%, until the Georgia Power 2019 Base Rate Case. At December 31, 2018, Georgia Power's actual retail common equity ratio (on a 13-month average basis) was approximately 55%. Benefits from reduced federal income tax rates in excess of the amounts refunded to customers will be retained by March 6, 2018. The ultimate outcomeGeorgia Power to cover the carrying costs of this matter cannot be determined at this time.the incremental equity in 2018 and 2019.
Integrated Resource Plan
See "Environmental Matters" herein for additional information regarding proposed and final EPA rules and regulations, including revisions to ELG for steam electric power plants and additional regulations of CCR and CO2.
In July 2016, the Georgia PSC approved Georgia Power's triennial Integrated Resource Plan (2016 IRP) including the decertification and retirement of Plant Mitchell Units 3, 4A, and 4B (217 MWs) and Plant Kraft Unit 1 (17 MWs), as well as the decertification of the Intercession City unit (143 MWs total capacity). In August 2016, the Plant Mitchell and Plant Kraft units were retired and Georgia Power sold its 33% ownership interest in the Intercession City unit to Duke Energy Florida, LLC.
Additionally, the Georgia PSC approved Georgia Power's environmental compliance strategy and related expenditures proposed in the 2016 IRP, including measures taken to comply with existing government-imposed environmental mandates, subject to limits on expenditures for Plant McIntosh Unit 1 and Plant Hammond Units 1 through 4.
The Georgia PSC approved the reclassification of the remaining net book value of Plant Mitchell Unit 3 and costs associated with materials and supplies remaining at the unit retirement date to a regulatory asset. Recovery of the unit's net book value will continue through December 31, 2019, as provided in the 2013 ARP. The timing of the recovery of the remaining balance of the unit's net book value as of December 31, 2019 and costs associated with materials and supplies remaining at the unit retirement date was deferred for consideration in Georgia Power's 2019 base rate case.
The Georgia PSC also approved the Renewable Energy Development Initiative (REDI) to procure an additional 1,200 MWs of renewable resources primarily utilizing market-based prices established through a competitive bidding process with expected in-service dates between 2018 and 2021. Additionally, 200 MWs of self-build capacity for use by Georgia Power was approved, as well as consideration for no more than 200 MWs of capacity as part of a renewable commercial and industrial program.
In 2017, Georgia Power filed for and received certification for 510 MWs of REDI utility-scale PPAs for solar generation resources, which are expected to be in operation by the end of 2019. Georgia Power also filed for and received approval to develop several solar generation projects to fulfill the approved self-build capacity.2019 Base Rate Case.
In the 2016 IRP, the Georgia PSC also approved recovery of costs up to $99 million through June 30, 2019 to preserve nuclear generation as an option at a future generation site in Stewart County, Georgia. OnIn March 7, 2017, the Georgia PSC approved Georgia Power's decision to suspend work at the site due to changing economics, including lower load forecasts and fuel costs. The timing of recovery for costs incurred of approximately $50 million is expected to be determined by the Georgia PSC in a futurethe Georgia Power rate case.2019 Base Rate Case.
Storm Damage Recovery
On January 31, 2019, Georgia Power is accruing $30filed its triennial IRP (2019 IRP). The filing includes a request to decertify and retire Plant Hammond Units 1 through 4 (840 MWs) and Plant McIntosh Unit 1 (142.5 MWs) upon approval of the 2019 IRP.
In the 2019 IRP, Georgia Power requested approval to reclassify the remaining net book value of Plant Hammond Units 1 through 4 (approximately $520 million annually throughat December 31, 2019, as provided2018) upon retirement to a regulatory asset to be amortized ratably over a period equal to the applicable unit's remaining useful life through 2035. For Plant McIntosh Unit 1, Georgia Power requested approval to reclassify the remaining net book value (approximately $40 million at December 31, 2018) upon retirement to a regulatory asset to be amortized over a three-year period to be determined in the 2013 ARP,Georgia Power 2019 Base Rate Case. Georgia Power also requested approval to reclassify any unusable material and supplies inventory balances remaining at the applicable unit's retirement date to a regulatory asset for incremental operatingrecovery over a period to be determined in the Georgia Power 2019 Base Rate Case.
The 2019 IRP also includes a request to certify approximately 25 MWs of capacity at Plant Scherer Unit 3 for the retail jurisdiction beginning January 1, 2020, following the expiration of a wholesale PPA.
The 2019 IRP also includes details regarding ARO costs associated with ash pond and maintenancelandfill closures and post-closure care. Georgia Power requested the timing and rate of recovery of these costs of damage from major stormsbe determined by the Georgia PSC in the Georgia Power 2019 Base Rate Case. See "Environmental Matters – Environmental Laws and Regulations – Coal Combustion Residuals" and FINANCIAL CONDITION AND LIQUIDITY – "Capital Requirements and Contractual Obligations" herein and Note 6 to its transmission and distribution facilities. Hurricanes Irma and Matthew caused significant damage tothe financial statements for additional information regarding Georgia Power's transmission and distribution facilities during September 2017 and October 2016, respectively. The incremental restoration costs related to these hurricanes deferred in Georgia Power's regulatoryAROs.
    Table of Contents                                Index to Financial Statements        

MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS (continued)
Southern Company and Subsidiary Companies 20172018 Annual Report


assetGeorgia Power also requested approval to issue two capacity-based requests for stormproposals (RFP). If approved, the first capacity-based RFP will seek resources that can provide capacity beginning in 2022 or 2023 and the second capacity-based RFP will seek resources that can provide capacity beginning in 2026, 2027, or 2028. Additionally, the 2019 IRP includes a request to procure an additional 1,000 MWs of renewable resources through a competitive bidding process. Georgia Power also proposed to invest in a portfolio of up to 50 MWs of battery energy storage technologies.
A decision from the Georgia PSC on the 2019 IRP is expected in mid-2019.
The ultimate outcome of these matters cannot be determined at this time.
Storm Damage Recovery
Georgia Power is accruing $30 million annually through December 31, 2019, as provided in the 2013 ARP, for incremental operations and maintenance costs of damage totaled approximately $260 million.from major storms to its transmission and distribution facilities. At December 31, 2017,2018, the total balance in Georgia Power'sthe regulatory asset related to storm damage was $333$416 million. During October 2018, Hurricane Michael caused significant damage to Georgia Power's transmission and distribution facilities. The incremental restoration costs related to this hurricane deferred in the regulatory asset for storm damage totaled approximately $115 million. Hurricanes Irma and Matthew also caused significant damage to Georgia Power's transmission and distribution facilities during September 2017 and October 2016, respectively. The incremental restoration costs related to Hurricanes Irma and Matthew deferred in Georgia Power's regulatory asset for storm damage totaled approximately $250 million. The rate of storm damage cost recovery is expected to be adjusted as part of the Georgia Power's next base rate case required to be filed by July 1, 2019. As a resultPower 2019 Base Rate Case and further adjusted in future regulatory proceedings as necessary. The ultimate outcome of this regulatory treatment, costs related to storms are not expected to have a material impact on Southern Company's financial statements.matter cannot be determined at this time. See Note 32 to the financial statements under "Regulatory MattersGeorgia PowerStorm Damage Recovery" for additional information regarding Georgia Power's storm damage reserve.
GulfMississippi Power
On April 4, 2017, the Florida PSC approved the 2017 Rate Case Settlement Agreement among Gulf Power and three intervenors with respect to GulfMississippi Power's request in 2016 to increase retail base rates. Amongrates generally are set under the termsPEP, a rate plan approved by the Mississippi PSC. Two filings are made for each calendar year: the PEP projected filing, which is typically filed prior to the beginning of the 2017 Rate Case Settlement Agreement, Gulf Power increased rates effective withyear based on a projected revenue requirement, and the first billing cycle in July 2017 to provide an annual overall net customer impact of approximately $54.3 million. The net customer impact consisted of a $62.0 million increase in annual base revenues, less an annual purchased power capacity cost recovery clause credit for certain wholesale revenues of approximately $8 million through December 2019. In addition, Gulf Power continued its authorized retail ROE midpoint (10.25%) and range (9.25% to 11.25%) andPEP lookback filing, which is deemed to have a maximum equity ratio of 52.5% for all retail regulatory purposes. Gulf Power also began amortizing the regulatory asset associated with the investment balances remainingfiled after the retirementend of Plant Smith Units 1the year and 2 (357 MWs) over 15 years effective January 1, 2018 and implemented new depreciation rates effective January 1, 2018. The 2017 Rate Case Settlement Agreement also resulted in a $32.5 million write-downallows for review of Gulf Power's ownership of Plant Scherer Unit 3 (205 MWs), which was recorded in the first quarter 2017. The remaining issues relatedactual revenue requirement compared to the inclusion of Gulf Power's investment in Plant Scherer Unit 3 in retail rates have been resolved as a result of the 2017 Rate Case Settlement Agreement, including recoverability of certain costs associated with the ongoing ownership and operation of the unit through the environmental cost recovery clause.
The 2017 Rate Case Settlement Agreement set forth a process for addressing the revenue requirement effects of the Tax Reform Legislation through a prospective change to Gulf Power's base rates. Under the terms of the 2017 Rate Case Settlement Agreement, by March 1, 2018, Gulf Power must identify the revenue requirements impacts and defer them to a regulatory asset or regulatory liability to be considered for prospective application in a change to base rates in a limited scope proceeding before the Florida PSC. In lieu of this approach, on February 14, 2018, the parties to the 2017 Rate Case Settlement Agreement filed a new stipulation and settlement agreement (2018 Tax Reform Settlement Agreement) with the Florida PSC. If approved, the 2018 Tax Reform Settlement Agreement will result in annual reductions of $18.2 million to Gulf Power's base rates and $15.6 million to Gulf Power's environmental cost recovery rates effective beginning the first calendar month following approval.
The 2018 Tax Reform Settlement Agreement also provides for a one-time refund of $69.4 million for the retail portion of unprotected (not subject to normalization) deferred tax liabilities through Gulf Power's fuel cost recovery rate over the remainder of 2018. In addition, a limited scope proceeding to address the flow back of protected deferred tax liabilities will be initiated by May 1, 2018 and Gulf Power will record a regulatory liability for the related 2018 amounts eligible to be returned to customers consistent with IRS normalization principles. Unless otherwise agreed to by the parties to the 2018 Tax Reform Settlement Agreement, amounts recorded in this regulatory liability will be refunded to retail customers in 2019 through Gulf Power's fuel cost recovery rate.
If the 2018 Tax Reform Settlement Agreement is approved, the 2017 Rate Case Settlement Agreement will be amended to increase Gulf Power's maximum equity ratio from 52.5% to 53.5% for regulatory purposes.
The ultimate outcome of these matters cannot be determined at this time.
Mississippi Powerprojected filing.
On February 7, 2018, Mississippi Power revised its annual projected PEP filing for 2018 to reflect the impacts of the Tax Reform Legislation. The revised filing requestsrequested an increase of $26 million in annual revenues, based on a performance adjusted ROE of 9.33% and an increased equity ratio of 55%. On July 27, 2018, Mississippi Power and the MPUS entered into a settlement agreement with respect to the 2018 PEP filing and all unresolved PEP filings for prior years (PEP Settlement Agreement), which was approved by the Mississippi PSC on August 7, 2018. Rates under the PEP Settlement Agreement became effective with the first billing cycle of September 2018. The PEP Settlement Agreement provides for an increase of approximately $21.6 million in annual base retail revenues, which excludes certain compensation costs contested by the MPUS, as well as approximately $2 million which was subsequently approved for recovery through Mississippi Power's 2018 Energy Efficiency Cost Rider.
Pursuant to the PEP Settlement Agreement, Mississippi Power's performance-adjusted allowed ROE is 9.31% and its allowed equity ratio is capped at 51%, pending further review by the Mississippi PSC. In lieu of the requested equity ratio increase, Mississippi Power retained $44 million of excess accumulated deferred income taxes resulting from the Tax Reform Legislation until the conclusion of Mississippi Power's next base rate case, which is scheduled to be filed in the fourth quarter 2019 (Mississippi Power 2019 Base Rate Case). Further, Mississippi Power agreed to seek equity contributions sufficient to restore its equity ratio to 50% by December 31, 2018.
Pursuant to the PEP Settlement Agreement, PEP proceedings are suspended until after the conclusion of the Mississippi Power 2019 Base Rate Case and Mississippi Power is not required to make any PEP filings for regulatory years 2018, 2019, and 2020. The PEP Settlement Agreement also resolved all open PEP filings with no change to customer rates.
Kemper County Energy Facility
In 2018, Mississippi Power recorded pre-tax charges to income of $37 million ($27 million after tax), primarily resulting from the abandonment and related closure activities and ongoing period costs, net of sales proceeds, for the mine and gasifier-related assets at the Kemper County energy facility. In addition, Mississippi Power recorded a credit to earnings of $95 million in the fourth quarter 2018 primarily resulting from the reduction of a valuation allowance for a state income tax net operating loss (NOL) carryforward associated with the Kemper County energy facility. Additional closure costs for the mine and gasifier-related assets, currently estimated at up to $10 million pre-tax (excluding salvage, net of dismantlement costs), may be incurred through the first half of 2020. In addition, period costs, including, but not limited to, costs for compliance and safety, ARO accretion, and property taxes for the mine and gasifier-related assets, are estimated to total $11 million in 2019 and $2 million to $4 million annually in
Table of ContentsIndex to Financial Statements

MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS (continued)
Southern Company and Subsidiary Companies 2018 Annual Report


2020 through 2023. Mississippi Power is currently evaluating its options regarding the final disposition of the CO2 pipeline, including removal of the pipeline. This evaluation is expected to be complete later in 2019. If Mississippi Power ultimately decides to remove the CO2 pipeline, the cost of removal could have a material impact on Southern Company's financial statements. The ultimate outcome of these matters cannot be determined at this time.
The combined cycle and associated common facilities portions of the Kemper County energy facility were dedicated as Plant Ratcliffe on April 27, 2018.
For additional information on the Kemper County energy facility, see Note 2 to the financial statements under "Mississippi PowerKemper County Energy Facility."
Reserve Margin Plan
On August 6, 2018, Mississippi Power filed its proposed Reserve Margin Plan (RMP), as required by the Mississippi PSC's order in the docket established for the purposes of pursuing a global settlement of the costs related to the Kemper County energy facility. Under the RMP, Mississippi Power proposed alternatives that would reduce its reserve margin, with the most economic of the alternatives being the two-year and seven-year acceleration of the retirement of Plant Watson Units 4 and 5, respectively, to the first quarter 2022 and the four-year acceleration of the retirement of Plant Greene County Units 1 and 2 to the third quarter 2021 and the third quarter 2022, respectively, in order to lower or avoid operating costs. The Plant Greene County unit retirements would require the completion by Alabama Power of proposed transmission and system reliability improvements, as well as agreement by Alabama Power. The RMP filing also states that, in the event the Mississippi PSC ultimately approves an alternative that includes an accelerated retirement, Mississippi Power would require authorization to defer in a regulatory asset for future recovery the remaining net book value of the units at the time of retirement. A decision by the Mississippi PSC that does not include recovery of the remaining book value of any generating units retired could have a material impact on Southern Company's financial statements. The ultimate outcome of this matter cannot be determined at this time.
Government Grants
In 2010, the DOE, through a cooperative agreement with SCS, agreed to fund $270 million of the Kemper County energy facility through the grants awarded to the project by the DOE under the Clean Coal Power Initiative Round 2. Through December 31, 2018, Mississippi Power received total DOE grants of $387 million, of which $382 million reduced the construction costs of the Kemper County energy facility and $5 million reimbursed Mississippi Power for expenses associated with DOE reporting. On December 12, 2018, Mississippi Power filed with the DOE its request for property closeout certification under the contract related to the grants received. Mississippi Power and the DOE are currently in discussions regarding the requested closeout and property disposition, which may require payment to the DOE for a portion of certain property that is to be retained by Mississippi Power. The ultimate outcome of this matter cannot be determined at this time; however, it could have a significant impact on Southern Company's financial statements.
Southern Company Gas
The natural gas distribution utilities are subject to regulation and oversight by their respective state regulatory agencies for the rates charged to their customers and other matters. These agencies approve rates designed to provide the opportunity to generate revenues to recover all prudently-incurred costs, including a return on rate base sufficient to pay interest on debt and provide a reasonable ROE.
The natural gas market for Atlanta Gas Light was deregulated in 1997. Accordingly, marketers,Marketers, rather than a traditional utility, sell natural gas to end-use customers in Georgia and handle customer billing functions. Atlanta Gas Light earns revenue for its
Table of ContentsIndex to Financial Statements

MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS (continued)
Southern Company and Subsidiary Companies 2017 Annual Report


distribution services by charging rates to its customers based primarily on monthly fixed charges that are set by the Georgia PSC and adjusted periodically.
With the exception of Atlanta Gas Light, the natural gas distribution utilities are authorized by the relevant regulatory agencies in the states in which they serve to use natural gas cost recovery mechanisms that adjust rates to reflect changes in the wholesale cost of natural gas and ensure recovery of all costs prudently incurred in purchasing natural gas for customers. Natural gas cost recovery revenues are adjusted for differences in actual recoverable natural gas costs and amounts billed in current regulated rates. Changes in the billing factor will not have a significant effect on revenues or net income, but will affect cash flows. In addition to natural gas cost recovery mechanisms, there are other cost recovery mechanisms, such as regulatory riders, which vary by utility but allow recovery of certain costs, such as those related to infrastructure replacement programs, as well as environmental remediation and energy efficiency plans. See Note 1 to the financial statements under "Cost of Natural Gas" for additional information.
Regulatory Infrastructure Programs
Certain of
MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS (continued)
Southern Company Gas'and Subsidiary Companies 2018 Annual Report


Infrastructure Replacement Programs and Capital Projects
In addition to capital expenditures recovered through base rates by each of the natural gas distribution utilities, are involved in ongoingNicor Gas and Virginia Natural Gas have separate rate riders that provide timely recovery of capital expenditures for specific infrastructure replacement programs. These infrastructure replacement programs and capital projects associated with infrastructure improvement programs that have been previously approved by their applicable state regulatory agenciesare risk-based and provide an appropriate return on invested capital. These infrastructure improvement programs are designed to update and replace cast iron, bare steel, and mid-vintage plastic materials or expand the natural gas distribution systems of the natural gas distribution utilities to improve reliability and meet operational flexibility and growth. Initial program lengths range from nine to 10 years, with completion dates ranging from 2020 through 2025. The total expected investment under thesethe infrastructure replacement programs for 2019 is $408 million. See Note 2 to the financial statements under "Southern Company GasInfrastructure Replacement Programs and Capital Projects" for additional information.
Rate Proceedings
On February 23, 2018, Atlanta Gas Light revised its annual base rate filing to reflect the impacts of the Tax Reform Legislation and requested a $16 million rate reduction in 2018. On May 15, 2018, the Georgia PSC approved a stipulation for Atlanta Gas Light's annual base rates to remain at the 2017 level for 2018 and 2019, with customer credits of $8 million in each of July 2018 and October 2018 to reflect the impacts of the Tax Reform Legislation. The Georgia PSC maintained Atlanta Gas Light's previously authorized earnings band based on a ROE between 10.55% and 10.95% and increased the allowed equity ratio by 4% to an equity ratio of 55% to address the negative cash flow and credit metric impacts of the Tax Reform Legislation. Additionally, Atlanta Gas Light is $395 million.
Base Rate Casesrequired to file a traditional base rate case on or before June 1, 2019 for rates effective January 1, 2020.
On January 31, 2018, the Illinois Commerce Commission approved a $137 million increase in Nicor Gas' annual base rate revenues, including $93 million related to the recovery of investments under Nicor Gas' infrastructure program, effective February 8, 2018, based on a ROE of 9.8%.
TheOn May 2, 2018, the Illinois Commerce Commission issued an order effective January 25, 2018 that requires utilitiesapproved Nicor Gas' rehearing request for revised base rates to incorporate the reduction in the statefederal income tax rate as a result of the Tax Reform Legislation. The resulting decrease of approximately $44 million in annual base rate revenues became effective May 5, 2018. Nicor Gas' previously-authorized capital structure and ROE of 9.80% were not addressed in the rehearing and remain unchanged. On November 9, 2018, Nicor Gas filed a general base rate case with the Illinois Commission requesting a $230 million increase in annual base rate revenues. The requested increase is based on a projected test year for the 12-month period ending September 30, 2020, a ROE of 10.6%, and an increase in the equity ratio from 52.0% to record54.0% to address the negative cash flow and credit metric impacts of the Tax Reform Legislation, including the reduction in the corporate income tax rate to 21% and the impact of excess deferred income taxes, as a regulatory liability. On February 20, 2018, theLegislation. The Illinois Commerce Commission granted Nicor Gas' application for rehearing to file revised base rates and tariffs, which Nicor Gas expects to file by the end of the second quarter 2018.
On December 1, 2017, Atlanta Gas Light filed its 2018 annual rate adjustment with the Georgia PSC. If approved, Atlanta Gas Light's annual base rate revenues will increase by $22 million, effective June 1, 2018. Atlanta Gas Light will file a revised rate adjustment to incorporate the effects of the Tax Reform Legislation in the first quarter 2018. The Georgia PSC is expected to rule on the revised requested increase inwithin the second quarter 2018.
11-month statutory time limit, after which rate adjustments will be effective. The ultimate outcome of these mattersthis matter cannot be determined at this time.
Fuel Cost Recovery
The traditional electric operating companies each have established fuel cost recovery rates approved by their respective state PSCs. Fuel cost recovery revenues are adjusted for differences in actual recoverable fuel costs and amounts billed in current regulated rates. Accordingly, changes in the billing factor will not have a significant effect on Southern Company's revenues or net income, but will affect cash flow. The traditional electric operating companies continuously monitor their under or over recovered fuel cost balances and make appropriate filings with their state PSCs to adjust fuel cost recovery rates as necessary.
See Note 1 to the financial statements under "Revenues" and Note 32 to the financial statements under "Regulatory MattersAlabama PowerRate ECR," "Georgia PowerFuel Cost Recovery," and "Regulatory MattersGeorgiaMississippi PowerFuel Cost Recovery" for additional information.
Kemper County Energy Facility
The Kemper County energy facility was approved by the Mississippi PSC as an IGCC facility in the 2010 CPCN proceedings, subject to a construction cost cap of $2.88 billion, net of $245 million of the Initial DOE Grants and excluding the Cost Cap Exceptions. The combined cycle and associated common facilities portions of the Kemper County energy facility were placed in service in August 2014. In December 2015, the Mississippi PSC issued the In-Service Asset Rate Order, authorizing rates that provided for the recovery of approximately $126 million annually related to the assets previously placed in service.
On June 21, 2017, the Mississippi PSC stated its intent to issue the Kemper Settlement Order (which occurred on July 6, 2017) directing Mississippi Power to pursue a settlement under which the Kemper County energy facility would be operated as a natural
Table of ContentsIndex to Financial Statements

MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS (continued)
Southern Company and Subsidiary Companies 2017 Annual Report


gas plant, rather than an IGCC plant, and address all issues associated with the Kemper County energy facility. The Kemper Settlement Order established the Kemper Settlement Docket for the purposes of pursuing a global settlement of the related costs.
On June 28, 2017, Mississippi Power notified the Mississippi PSC that it would begin a process to suspend operations and start-up activities on the gasifier portion of the Kemper County energy facility, given the uncertainty as to its future. At the time of project suspension, the total cost estimate for the Kemper County energy facility was approximately $7.38 billion, including approximately $5.95 billion of costs subject to the construction cost cap, and was net of the $137 million in Additional DOE Grants. In the aggregate, Mississippi Power had incurred charges of $3.07 billion ($1.89 billion after tax) as a result of changes in the cost estimate above the cost cap for the Kemper IGCC through May 31, 2017. Given the Mississippi PSC's stated intent regarding no further rate increase for the Kemper County energy facility and the subsequent suspension, cost recovery of the gasifier portions became no longer probable; therefore, Mississippi Power recorded an additional charge to income in June 2017 of $2.8 billion ($2.0 billion after tax), which included estimated costs associated with the gasifier portions of the plant and lignite mine.
On February 6, 2018, the Mississippi PSC voted to approve the Kemper Settlement Agreement related to cost recovery for the Kemper County energy facility among Mississippi Power, the MPUS, and certain intervenors. The Kemper Settlement Agreement provides for an annual revenue requirement of approximately $99.3 million for costs related to the Kemper County energy facility, which includes the impact of Tax Reform Legislation. The revenue requirement is based on (i) a fixed ROE for 2018 of 8.6%, excluding any performance adjustment, (ii) a ROE for 2019 calculated in accordance with PEP, excluding the performance adjustment, (iii) for future years, a performance-based ROE calculated pursuant to PEP, and (iv) amortization periods for the related regulatory assets and liabilities of eight years and six years, respectively. The revenue requirement also reflects a disallowance related to a portion of Mississippi Power's investment in the Kemper County energy facility requested for inclusion in rate base, which was recorded in the fourth quarter 2017 as an additional charge to income of approximately $78 million ($85 million net of accumulated depreciation of $7 million) pre-tax ($48 million after tax).
Under the Kemper Settlement Agreement, retail customer rates will reflect a reduction of approximately $26.8 million annually and include no recovery for costs associated with the gasifier portion of the Kemper County energy facility in 2018 or at any future date. On February 12, 2018, Mississippi Power made the required compliance filing with the Mississippi PSC. The Kemper Settlement Agreement also requires (i) the CPCN for the Kemper County energy facility to be modified to limit it to natural gas combined cycle operation and (ii) Mississippi Power to file a reserve margin plan with the Mississippi PSC by August 2018.
During the third and fourth quarters of 2017, Mississippi Power recorded charges to income of $242 million ($206 million after tax), including $164 million for ongoing project costs, estimated mine and gasifier-related costs, and certain termination costs during the suspension period prior to conclusion of the Kemper Settlement Docket, as well as the charge associated with the Kemper Settlement Agreement. Additional pre-tax cancellation costs, including mine and plant closure and contract termination costs, currently estimated at approximately $50 million to $100 million (excluding salvage), are expected to be incurred in 2018. Mississippi Power has begun efforts to dispose of or abandon the mine and gasifier-related assets.
Total pre-tax charges to income related to the Kemper County energy facility were $3.4 billion ($2.4 billion after tax) for the year ended December 31, 2017. In the aggregate, since the Kemper County energy facility project started, Mississippi Power has incurred charges of $6.2 billion ($4.1 billion after tax) through December 31, 2017.
As a result of the Mississippi PSC order on February 6, 2018, rate recovery for the Kemper County energy facility is resolved, subject to any future legal challenges.
See Note 3 to the financial statements under "Kemper County Energy Facility" for additional information.
Litigation
On April 26, 2016, a complaint against Mississippi Power was filed in Harrison County Circuit Court (Circuit Court) by Biloxi Freezing & Processing Inc., Gulfside Casino Partnership, and John Carlton Dean, which was amended and refiled on July 11, 2016 to include, among other things, Southern Company as a defendant. The individual plaintiff alleges that Mississippi Power and Southern Company violated the Mississippi Unfair Trade Practices Act. All plaintiffs have alleged that Mississippi Power and Southern Company concealed, falsely represented, and failed to fully disclose important facts concerning the cost and schedule of the Kemper County energy facility and that these alleged breaches have unjustly enriched Mississippi Power and Southern Company. The plaintiffs seek unspecified actual damages and punitive damages; ask the Circuit Court to appoint a receiver to oversee, operate, manage, and otherwise control all affairs relating to the Kemper County energy facility; ask the Circuit Court to revoke any licenses or certificates authorizing Mississippi Power or Southern Company to engage in any business related to the Kemper County energy facility in Mississippi; and seek attorney's fees, costs, and interest. The plaintiffs also seek an injunction to prevent any Kemper County energy facility costs from being charged to customers through electric rates. On June 23, 2017, the Circuit Court ruled in favor of motions by Southern Company and Mississippi Power and dismissed the case. On July 7, 2017, the
Table of ContentsIndex to Financial Statements

MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS (continued)
Southern Company and Subsidiary Companies 2017 Annual Report


plaintiffs filed notice of an appeal. Southern Company believes this legal challenge has no merit; however, an adverse outcome in this proceeding could have a material impact on Southern Company's results of operations, financial condition, and liquidity. Southern Company intends to vigorously defend itself in this matter and the ultimate outcome of this matter cannot be determined at this time.
On June 9, 2016, Treetop Midstream Services, LLC (Treetop) and other related parties filed a complaint against Mississippi Power, Southern Company, and SCS in the state court in Gwinnett County, Georgia. The complaint related to the cancelled CO2 contract with Treetop and alleged fraudulent misrepresentation, fraudulent concealment, civil conspiracy, and breach of contract on the part of Mississippi Power, Southern Company, and SCS and sought compensatory damages of $100 million, as well as unspecified punitive damages. Southern Company, Mississippi Power, and SCS moved to compel arbitration pursuant to the terms of the CO2 contract, which the court granted on May 4, 2017. On June 28, 2017, Treetop and other related parties filed a claim for arbitration requesting $500 million in damages. On December 28, 2017, Mississippi Power reached a settlement agreement with Treetop and other related parties and the arbitration was dismissed.
Construction Program
Overview
The subsidiary companies of Southern Company are engaged in continuous construction programs to accommodate existing and estimated future loads on their respective systems. The Southern Company system intends to continue its strategy of developing and constructing new electric generating facilities, adding environmental modifications to certain existing units, expanding and improving the electric transmission and distribution systems, and updating and expanding the natural gas distribution systems. For the traditional electric operating companies, major generation construction projects are subject to state PSC approval in order to be included in retail rates. While Southern Power generally constructs and acquires generation assets covered by long-term PPAs, any uncontracted capacity could negatively affect future earnings. Southern Company Gas is engaged in various infrastructure improvement programs designed to update or expand the natural gas distribution systems of the natural gas distribution utilities to improve reliability and meet operational flexibility and growth. The natural gas distribution utilities recover their investment and a return associated with these infrastructure programs through their regulated rates. See Note 15 to the financial statements under "Southern Power" for additional information about costs relating to Southern Power's acquisitions that involve construction of renewable energy facilities and Note 2 to the financial statements under "Southern Company GasInfrastructure Replacement
Table of ContentsIndex to Financial Statements      �� 

MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS (continued)
Southern Company and Subsidiary Companies 2018 Annual Report


Programs and Capital Projects" for additional information regarding infrastructure improvement programs at the natural gas distribution utilities.
The Southern Company system's construction program is currently estimated to total approximately $9.4$8.0 billion, $9.3$7.7 billion, $8.4$6.7 billion, $7.0$6.3 billion, and $6.9$6.0 billion for 2018, 2019, 2020, 2021, 2022, and 2022,2023, respectively.
The largest construction project currently underway in the Southern Company system is Plant Vogtle Units 3 and 4 (45.7% ownership interest by Georgia Power in the two units, each with approximately 1,100 MWs). See Note 3 to the financial statements under "Nuclear Construction" for additional information. See Note 12 to the financial statements under "Southern Power" for additional information about costs relating to Southern Power's acquisitions that involve construction of renewable energy facilities. See Note 3 to the financial statements under "Regulatory MattersSouthern Company GasRegulatory Infrastructure Programs" for additional information regarding infrastructure improvement programs at the natural gas distribution utilities.
Also see FINANCIAL CONDITION AND LIQUIDITY – "Capital Requirements and Contractual Obligations" herein for additional information regarding Southern Company's capital requirements for its subsidiaries' construction programs.
Nuclear Construction
In 2009, the Georgia PSC certified construction of Plant Vogtle Units 3 and 4. Georgia Power holds a 45.7% ownership interest in Plant Vogtle Units 3 and 4. In 2012, the NRC issued the related combined construction and operating licenses, which allowed full construction of the two AP1000 nuclear units (with electric generating capacity of approximately 1,100 MWs each) and related facilities to begin. Until March 2017, construction on Plant Vogtle Units 3 and 4 continued under the Vogtle 3 and 4 Agreement, andwhich was a substantially fixed price agreement. In March 2017, the EPC Contractor filed for bankruptcy protection under Chapter 11 of the U.S. Bankruptcy Code.
In 2008,connection with the EPC Contractor's bankruptcy filing, Georgia Power, acting for itself and as agent for the Vogtle Owners, entered into the Vogtle 3 and 4 Agreement. Under the terms of the Vogtle 3 and 4Interim Assessment Agreement the Vogtle Owners agreed to pay a purchase price subject to certain price escalations and adjustments, including fixed escalation amounts and index-based adjustments, as well as adjustments for change orders, and performance bonuses for early completion and unit performance. Under the Toshiba Guarantee, Toshiba guaranteed certain payment obligations ofwith the EPC Contractor including any liability of the EPC Contractor for abandonment of work. In the first quarter 2016, Westinghouse delivered to the Vogtle Owners a total of $920 million of letters of credit from financial institutions (Westinghouse Letters of Credit)allow construction to secure a portion of the EPC Contractor's potential obligations under the Vogtle 3 and 4 Agreement.
Subsequent to the EPC Contractor bankruptcy filing, a number of subcontractors to the EPC Contractor alleged non-payment by the EPC Contractor for amounts owed for work performed on Plant Vogtle Units 3 and 4. Georgia Power, acting for itself and as agent for the Vogtle Owners, has taken actions to remove liens filed by these subcontractors through the posting of surety bonds. Related to such liens, certain subcontractors have filed, and additional subcontractors may file, actions against the EPC Contractor
Table of ContentsIndex to Financial Statements

MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS (continued)
Southern Company and Subsidiary Companiescontinue. The Interim Assessment Agreement expired in July 2017 Annual Report


and the Vogtle Owners to preserve their payment rights with respect to such claims. All amounts associated with the removal of subcontractor liens and other EPC Contractor pre-petition accounts payable have been paid or accrued as of December 31, 2017.
On June 9, 2017, Georgia Power and the other Vogtle Owners and Toshiba entered into the Guarantee Settlement Agreement. Pursuant to the Guarantee Settlement Agreement, Toshiba acknowledged the amount of its obligation was $3.68 billion (Guarantee Obligations), of which Georgia Power's proportionate share was approximately $1.7 billion. The Guarantee Settlement Agreement provided for a schedule of payments for the Guarantee Obligations beginning in October 2017 and continuing through January 2021. Toshiba made the first three payments as scheduled. On December 8, 2017, Georgia Power, the other Vogtle Owners, certain affiliates of the Municipal Electric Authority of Georgia (MEAG Power), and Toshiba entered into Amendment No. 1 to the Guarantee Settlement Agreement (Guarantee Settlement Agreement Amendment). The Guarantee Settlement Agreement Amendment provided that Toshiba's remaining payment obligations under the Guarantee Settlement Agreement were due and payable in full on December 15, 2017, which Toshiba satisfied on December 14, 2017. Pursuant to the Guarantee Settlement Agreement Amendment, Toshiba was deemed to be the owner of certain pre-petition bankruptcy claims of Georgia Power, the other Vogtle Owners, and certain affiliates of MEAG Power against Westinghouse, and Georgia Power and the other Vogtle Owners surrendered the Westinghouse Letters of Credit.
Additionally, on June 9, 2017,when Georgia Power, acting for itself and as agent for the other Vogtle Owners, and the EPC Contractor entered into the Vogtle Services Agreement, which was amended and restated on July 20, 2017. On July 20, 2017, the bankruptcy court approved the EPC Contractor's motion seeking authorization to (i) enter intoAgreement. Under the Vogtle Services Agreement, (ii) assumeWestinghouse provides facility design and assign to the Vogtle Owners certain project-related contracts, (iii) join the Vogtle Owners as counterparties to certain assumed project-related contracts,engineering services, procurement and (iv) reject the Vogtle 3technical support, and 4 Agreement.staff augmentation on a time and materials cost basis. The Vogtle Services Agreement and the EPC Contractor's rejection of the Vogtle 3 and 4 Agreement, became effective upon approval by the DOE on July 27, 2017. The Vogtle Services Agreementprovides that it will continue until the start-up and testing of Plant Vogtle Units 3 and 4 are complete and electricity is generated and sold from both units. The Vogtle Services Agreement is terminable by the Vogtle Owners upon 30 days' written notice.
EffectiveIn October 23, 2017, Georgia Power, acting for itself and as agent for the other Vogtle Owners, entered into a construction completion agreement withexecuted the Bechtel whereby Bechtel will serve as the primary contractor for the remaining construction activities for Plant Vogtle Units 3 and 4 (Bechtel Agreement). Facility design and engineering remains the responsibility of the EPC Contractor under the Vogtle Services Agreement. The Bechtel Agreement, is a cost reimbursable plus fee arrangement, whereby Bechtel will beis reimbursed for actual costs plus a base fee and an at-risk fee, which is subject to adjustment based on Bechtel's performance against cost and schedule targets. Each Vogtle Owner is severally (not jointly) liable for its proportionate share, based on its ownership interest, of all amounts owed to Bechtel under the Bechtel Agreement. The Vogtle Owners may terminate the Bechtel Agreement at any time for their convenience, provided that the Vogtle Owners will be required to pay amounts related to work performed prior to the termination (including the applicable portion of the base fee), certain termination-related costs, and, at certain stages of the work, the applicable portion of the at-risk fee. Bechtel may terminate the Bechtel Agreement under certain circumstances, including certain Vogtle Owner suspensions of work, certain breaches of the Bechtel Agreement by the Vogtle Owners, Vogtle Owner insolvency, and certain other events. Pursuant to the Loan Guarantee Agreement between Georgia Power and the DOE, Georgia Power is required to obtain the DOE's approval of the Bechtel Agreement prior to obtaining any further advances under the Loan Guarantee Agreement.
OnCost and Schedule
Georgia Power's approximate proportionate share of the remaining estimated capital cost to complete Plant Vogtle Units 3 and 4 by the expected in-service dates of November 2,2021 and November 2022, respectively, is as follows:
 (in billions)
Base project capital cost forecast(a)(b)
$8.0
Construction contingency estimate0.4
Total project capital cost forecast(a)(b)
8.4
Net investment as of December 31, 2018(b)
(4.6)
Remaining estimate to complete(a)
$3.8
(a)Excludes financing costs expected to be capitalized through AFUDC of approximately $315 million.
(b)Net of $1.7 billion received from Toshiba under the Guarantee Settlement Agreement and approximately $188 million in related Customer Refunds.
Georgia Power estimates that its financing costs for construction of Plant Vogtle Units 3 and 4 will total approximately $3.1 billion, of which $1.9 billion had been incurred through December 31, 2018.
As construction continues, challenges with management of contractors, subcontractors, and vendors; labor productivity, availability, and/or cost escalation; procurement, fabrication, delivery, assembly, and/or installation and testing, including any
Table of ContentsIndex to Financial Statements

MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS (continued)
Southern Company and Subsidiary Companies 2018 Annual Report


required engineering changes, of plant systems, structures, and components (some of which are based on new technology that only recently began initial operation in the global nuclear industry at this scale); or other issues could arise and change the projected schedule and estimated cost. Monthly construction production targets required to maintain the current project schedule will continue to increase significantly throughout 2019. To meet these increasing monthly targets, existing craft construction productivity must improve and additional craft laborers must be retained and deployed.
Georgia Power and Southern Nuclear believe it is a leading practice in connection with a construction project of this size and complexity to periodically validate recent construction progress in comparison to the projected schedule and to verify and update quantities of commodities remaining to install, labor productivity, and forecasted staffing needs. This verification process, led by Southern Nuclear, was underway as of December 31, 2018 and is expected to be completed during the second quarter 2019. Georgia Power currently does not anticipate any material changes to the total estimated project capital cost forecast for Plant Vogtle Units 3 and 4 or the expected in-service dates of November 2021 and November 2022, respectively, resulting from this verification process. However, the ultimate impact on cost and schedule, if any, will not be known until the verification process is completed. Georgia Power is required to report the results and any project impacts to the Georgia PSC by May 15, 2019.
There have been technical and procedural challenges to the construction and licensing of Plant Vogtle Units 3 and 4 at the federal and state level and additional challenges may arise. Processes are in place that are designed to assure compliance with the requirements specified in the Westinghouse Design Control Document and the combined construction and operating licenses, including inspections by Southern Nuclear and the NRC that occur throughout construction. As a result of such compliance processes, certain license amendment requests have been filed and approved or are pending before the NRC. Various design and other licensing-based compliance matters, including the timely resolution of ITAAC and the related approvals by the NRC, may arise, which may result in additional license amendments or require other resolution. If any license amendment requests or other licensing-based compliance issues are not resolved in a timely manner, there may be delays in the project schedule that could result in increased costs.
The ultimate outcome of these matters cannot be determined at this time. However, any extension of the project schedule is currently estimated to result in additional base capital costs of approximately $50 million per month, based on Georgia Power's ownership interests, and AFUDC of approximately $12 million per month. While Georgia Power is not precluded from seeking recovery of any future capital cost forecast increase, management will ultimately determine whether or not to seek recovery. Any further changes to the capital cost forecast that are not expected to be recoverable through regulated rates will be required to be charged to income and such charges could be material.
Joint Owner Contracts
In November 2017, the Vogtle Owners entered into an amendment to their joint ownership agreements for Plant Vogtle Units 3 and 4 (as amended, Vogtle Joint Ownership Agreements) to provide for, among other conditions, additional Vogtle Owner approval requirements. PursuantEffective August 31, 2018, the Vogtle Owners further amended the joint ownership agreements to clarify and provide procedures for certain provisions of the joint ownership agreements related to adverse events that require the vote of the holders of at least 90% of the ownership interests in Plant Vogtle Units 3 and 4 to continue construction (as amended, and together with the November 2017 amendment, the Vogtle Joint Ownership Agreements). The Vogtle Joint Ownership Agreements also confirm that the Vogtle Owners' sole recourse against Georgia Power or Southern Nuclear for any action or inaction in connection with their performance as agent for the Vogtle Owners is limited to removal of Georgia Power and/or Southern Nuclear as agent, except in cases of willful misconduct.
As a result of the increase in the total project capital cost forecast and Georgia Power's decision not to seek rate recovery of the increase in the base capital costs as described below, the holders of at least 90% of the ownership interests in Plant Vogtle Units 3 and 4 were required to vote to continue construction. On September 26, 2018, the Vogtle Owners unanimously voted to continue construction of Plant Vogtle Units 3 and 4.
Amendments to the Vogtle Joint Ownership Agreements
In connection with the vote to continue construction, Georgia Power entered into (i) the Vogtle Owner Term Sheet with the other Vogtle Owners and MEAG's wholly-owned subsidiaries MEAG SPVJ, MEAG Power SPVM, LLC (MEAG SPVM), and MEAG Power SPVP, LLC (MEAG SPVP) to take certain actions which partially mitigate potential financial exposure for the other Vogtle Owners, including additional amendments to the Vogtle Joint Ownership Agreements and the purchase of PTCs from the other Vogtle Owners, and (ii) the MEAG Term Sheet with MEAG and MEAG SPVJ to provide funding with respect to MEAG SPVJ's ownership interest in Plant Vogtle Units 3 and 4 (Project J) under certain circumstances. On January 14, 2019, Georgia Power, MEAG, and MEAG SPVJ entered into an agreement to implement the provisions of the MEAG Term Sheet (MEAG Funding Agreement). On February 18, 2019, Georgia Power, the other Vogtle Owners, and MEAG's wholly-owned subsidiaries MEAG SPVJ, MEAG SPVM, and MEAG SPVP entered into certain amendments to the Vogtle Joint Ownership Agreements to implement the provisions of the Vogtle Owner Term Sheet (Global Amendments).
Table of ContentsIndex to Financial Statements

MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS (continued)
Southern Company and Subsidiary Companies 2018 Annual Report


Pursuant to the Global Amendments, and consistent with the Vogtle Owner Term Sheet, the Vogtle Joint Ownership Agreements were modified as follows: (i) each Vogtle Owner must pay its proportionate share of qualifying construction costs for Plant Vogtle Units 3 and 4 based on its ownership percentage up to the estimated cost at completion (EAC) for Plant Vogtle Units 3 and 4 which formed the basis of Georgia Power's forecast of $8.4 billion in the nineteenth VCM plus $800 million; (ii) Georgia Power will be responsible for 55.7% of actual qualifying construction costs between $800 million and $1.6 billion over the EAC in the nineteenth VCM (resulting in $80 million of potential additional costs to Georgia Power), with the remaining Vogtle Owners responsible for 44.3% of such costs pro rata in accordance with their respective ownership interests; and (iii) Georgia Power will be responsible for 65.7% of qualifying construction costs between $1.6 billion and $2.1 billion over the EAC in the nineteenth VCM (resulting in a further $100 million of potential additional costs to Georgia Power), with the remaining Vogtle Owners responsible for 34.3% of such costs pro rata in accordance with their respective ownership interests.
If the EAC is revised and exceeds the EAC in the nineteenth VCM by more than $2.1 billion, each of the other Vogtle Owners will have a one-time option at the time the project budget forecast is so revised to tender a portion of its ownership interest to Georgia Power in exchange for Georgia Power's agreement to pay 100% of such Vogtle Owner's remaining share of total construction costs in excess of the EAC in the nineteenth VCM plus $2.1 billion. In this event, Georgia Power will have the option of cancelling the project in lieu of purchasing a portion of the ownership interest of any other Vogtle Owner. If Georgia Power accepts the offer to purchase a portion of another Vogtle Owner's ownership interest in Plant Vogtle Units 3 and 4, the ownership interest(s) to be conveyed from the tendering Vogtle Owner(s) to Georgia Power will be calculated based on the proportion of the cumulative amount of construction costs paid by each such tendering Vogtle Owner(s) and by Georgia Power as of the COD of Plant Vogtle Unit 4. For purposes of this calculation, payments made by Georgia Power on behalf of another Vogtle Owner in accordance with the second and third items described in the paragraph above will be treated as payments made by the applicable Vogtle Owner.
In the event the actual costs of construction at completion of a Unit are less than the EAC reflected in the nineteenth VCM report and such Unit is placed in service in accordance with the schedule projected in the nineteenth VCM report (i.e., Plant Vogtle Unit 3 is placed in service by November 2021 or Plant Vogtle Unit 4 is placed in service by November 2022), Georgia Power will be entitled to 60.7% of the cost savings with respect to the relevant Unit and the remaining Vogtle Owners will be entitled to 39.3% of such savings on a pro rata basis in accordance with their respective ownership interests.
For purposes of the foregoing provisions, qualifying construction costs will not include costs (i) resulting from force majeure events, including governmental actions or inactions (or significant delays associated with issuance of such actions) that affect the licensing, completion, start-up, operations, or financing of Plant Vogtle Units 3 and 4, administrative proceedings or litigation regarding ITAAC or other regulatory challenges to commencement of operation of Plant Vogtle Units 3 and 4, and changes in laws or regulations governing Plant Vogtle Units 3 and 4, (ii) legal fees and legal expenses incurred due to litigation with contractors or subcontractors that are not subsidiaries or affiliates of Southern Company, and (iii) additional costs caused by requests from the Vogtle Owners other than Georgia Power, except for the exercise of a right to vote granted under the Vogtle Joint Ownership Agreements, that increase costs by $100,000 or more.
Pursuant to the Global Amendments, and consistent with the Vogtle Owner Term Sheet, the provisions of the Vogtle Joint Ownership Agreements requiring that Vogtle Owners holding 90% of the ownership interests in Plant Vogtle Units 3 and 4 vote to continue construction following certain adverse events (Project Adverse Events) were modified. Pursuant to the Global Amendments, the holders of at least 90% of the ownership interests in Plant Vogtle Units 3 and 4 must vote to continue construction if certain adverse eventsProject Adverse Events occur, includingincluding: (i) the bankruptcy of Toshiba; (ii) the termination or rejection in bankruptcy of certain agreements, including the Vogtle Services Agreement, the Bechtel Agreement, or the Bechtel Agreement;agency agreement with Southern Nuclear; (iii) Georgia Power publicly announces its intention not to submit for rate recovery any portion of its investment in Plant Vogtle Units 3 and 4 or the Georgia PSC or Georgia Power determines that any of Georgia Power's costs relating to the construction of Plant Vogtle Units 3 and 4 will not be recovered in retail rates, because suchexcluding any additional amounts paid by Georgia Power on behalf of the other Vogtle Owners pursuant to the Global Amendments described above and the first 6% of costs during any six-month VCM reporting period that are deemed unreasonabledisallowed by the Georgia PSC for recovery, or imprudent; orfor which Georgia Power elects not to seek cost recovery, through retail rates; and (iv) an increase in the construction budget contained in the seventeenth VCM report of more than $1 billion orincremental extension of one year or more over the most recently approved schedule. Under the Global Amendments, Georgia Power may cancel the project schedule containedat any time in the seventeenth VCM report of more than one year. its sole discretion.
In addition, pursuant to the Vogtle Joint Ownership Agreements, the required approval of holders of ownership interests in Plant Vogtle Units 3 and 4 is at least (i) 90% for a change of the primary construction contractor and (ii) 67% for material amendments to the Vogtle Services Agreement or agreements with Southern Nuclear or the primary construction contractor, including the Bechtel Agreement.
The Global Amendments provide that if the holders of at least 90% of the ownership interests fail to vote in favor of continuing the project following any future Project Adverse Event, work on Plant Vogtle Joint Ownership Agreements also confirm that the Vogtle Owners' sole recourse against Georgia Power or Southern NuclearUnits 3 and 4 will continue for any action or inaction in connection with their performance as agent for the Vogtle Owners is limited to removala period of Georgia Power and/or Southern Nuclear as agent, except in cases of willful misconduct.30 days if
    Table of Contents                                Index to Financial Statements        

MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS (continued)
Southern Company and Subsidiary Companies 20172018 Annual Report


the holders of more than 50% of the ownership interests vote in favor of continuing construction (Majority Voting Owners). In such a case, the Vogtle Owners (i) have agreed to negotiate in good faith towards the resumption of the project, (ii) if no agreement is reached during such 30-day period, the project will be cancelled, and (iii) in the event of such a cancellation, the Majority Voting Owners will be obligated to reimburse any other Vogtle Owner for the incremental costs it incurred during such 30-day negotiation period.
Purchase of PTCs During Commercial Operation
Pursuant to the Global Amendments, and consistent with the Vogtle Owner Term Sheet, Georgia Power has agreed to purchase additional PTCs from OPC, Dalton, MEAG SPVM, MEAG SPVP, and MEAG SPVJ (to the extent any MEAG SPVJ PTC rights remain after any purchases required under the MEAG Funding Agreement as described below) at varying purchase prices dependent upon the actual cost to complete construction of Plant Vogtle Units 3 and 4 as compared to the EAC reflected in the nineteenth VCM report. The purchases are at the option of the applicable Vogtle Owner.
Potential Funding to MEAG Project J
Pursuant to the MEAG Funding Agreement, and consistent with the MEAG Term Sheet, if MEAG SPVJ is unable to make its payments due under the Vogtle Joint Ownership Agreements solely as a result of the occurrence of one of the following situations that materially impedes access to capital markets for MEAG for Project J: (i) the conduct of JEA or the City of Jacksonville, such as JEA's legal challenges of its obligations under a PPA with MEAG (PPA-J), or (ii) PPA-J is declared void by a court of competent jurisdiction or rejected by JEA under the applicable provisions of the U.S. Bankruptcy Code (each of (i) and (ii), a JEA Default), at MEAG's request, Georgia Power will purchase from MEAG SPVJ the rights to PTCs attributable to MEAG SPVJ's share of Plant Vogtle Units 3 and 4 (approximately 206 MWs) within 30 days of such request at varying prices dependent upon the stage of construction of Plant Vogtle Units 3 and 4. The aggregate purchase price of the PTCs, together with any advances made as described in the next paragraph, shall not exceed $300 million.
At the option of MEAG, as an alternative or supplement to Georgia Power's purchase of PTCs as described above, Georgia Power has agreed to provide up to $250 million in funding to MEAG for Project J in the form of advances (either advances under the Vogtle Joint Ownership Agreements or the purchase of MEAG Project J bonds, at the discretion of Georgia Power), subject to any required approvals of the Georgia PSC and the DOE.
In the event MEAG SPVJ certifies to Georgia Power that it is unable to fund its obligations under the Vogtle Joint Ownership Agreements as a result of a JEA Default and Georgia Power becomes obligated to provide funding as described above, MEAG is required to (i) assign to Georgia Power its right to vote on any future Project Adverse Event and (ii) diligently pursue JEA for its breach of PPA-J. In addition, Georgia Power agreed that it will not sue MEAG for any amounts due from MEAG SPVJ under MEAG's guarantee of MEAG SPVJ's obligations so long as MEAG SPVJ complies with the terms of the MEAG Funding Agreement as to its payment obligations and the other non-payment provisions of the Vogtle Joint Ownership Agreements.
Under the terms of the MEAG Funding Agreement, Georgia Power may cancel the project in lieu of providing funding in the form of advances or PTC purchases.
The ultimate outcome of these matters cannot be determined at this time.
Regulatory Matters
In 2009, the Georgia PSC voted to certify construction of Plant Vogtle Units 3 and 4 with a certified capital cost of $4.418 billion. In addition, in 2009 the Georgia PSC approved inclusion of the Plant Vogtle Units 3 and 4 related CWIP accounts in rate base, and the State of Georgia enacted the Georgia Nuclear Energy Financing Act, which allows Georgia Power to recover financing costs for nuclear construction projects certified by the Georgia PSC.Plant Vogtle Units 3 and 4. Financing costs are recovered on all applicable certified costs through annual adjustments to the NCCR tariff up to the certified capital cost of $4.418 billion. As ofAt December 31, 2017,2018, Georgia Power had recovered approximately $1.6$1.9 billion of financing costs. On January 30, 2018,Financing costs related to capital costs above $4.418 billion will be recovered through AFUDC; however, Georgia Power filedwill not record AFUDC related to decreaseany capital costs in excess of the total deemed reasonable by the Georgia PSC (currently $7.3 billion) and not requested for rate recovery. On December 18, 2018, the Georgia PSC approved Georgia Power's request to increase the NCCR tariff by approximately $50$88 million annually, effective AprilJanuary 1, 2018, pending Georgia PSC approval. The decrease reflects the payments received under the Guarantee Settlement Agreement, the Customer Refunds ordered by the Georgia PSC aggregating approximately $188 million, and the estimated effects of Tax Reform Legislation. The Customer Refunds were recognized as a regulatory liability as of December 31, 2017 and will be paid in three installments of $25 to each retail customer no later than the third quarter 2018.2019.
Georgia Power is required to file semi-annual VCM reports with the Georgia PSC by February 28 and August 31 of each year. In October 2013, in connection with the eighth VCM report, the Georgia PSC approved a stipulation (2013 Stipulation) between Georgia Power and the staff of the Georgia PSC to waive the requirement to amend the Plant Vogtle Units 3 and 4 certificate in accordance with the 2009 certification order until the completion of Plant Vogtle Unit 3, or earlier if deemed appropriate by the Georgia PSC and Georgia Power.
On December 20,

MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS (continued)
Southern Company and Subsidiary Companies 2018 Annual Report


In 2016, the Georgia PSC voted to approve a settlement agreement (Vogtle Cost Settlement Agreement) resolving certain prudency matters in connection with the fifteenth VCM report. OnIn December 21, 2017, the Georgia PSC voted to approve (and issued its related order on January 11, 2018) certain recommendations made by Georgia Power in thePower's seventeenth VCM report, which included a recommendation to continue construction with Southern Nuclear as project manager and modifyingBechtel serving as the primary construction contractor, and modified the Vogtle Cost Settlement Agreement. The Vogtle Cost Settlement Agreement, as modified by the January 11, 2018 order, resolved the following regulatory matters related to Plant Vogtle Units 3 and 4: (i) none of the $3.3 billion of costs incurred through December 31, 2015 and reflected in the fourteenth VCM report should be disallowed from rate base on the basis of imprudence; (ii) the Contractor Settlement Agreement was reasonable and prudent and none of the amounts paid pursuant to the Contractor Settlement Agreement should be disallowed from rate base on the basis of imprudence; (iii) (a) capital costs incurred up to $5.680$5.68 billion would be presumed to be reasonable and prudent with the burden of proof on any party challenging such costs, (b) Georgia Power would have the burden to show that any capital costs above $5.680$5.68 billion were prudent, and (c) a revised capital cost forecast of $7.3 billion (after reflecting the impact of payments received under the Guarantee Settlement Agreement and related Customer Refunds) iswas found reasonable; (iv) construction of Plant Vogtle Units 3 and 4 should be completed, with Southern Nuclear serving as project manager and Bechtel as primary contractor; (v) approved and deemed reasonable Georgia Power's revised schedule placing Plant Vogtle Units 3 and 4 in service in November 2021 and November 2022, respectively; (vi) confirmed that the revised cost forecast does not represent a cost cap and that prudence decisions on cost recovery will be made at a later date, consistent with applicable Georgia law; (vii) reduced the ROE used to calculate the NCCR tariff (a) from 10.95% (the ROE rate setting point authorized by the Georgia PSC in the 2013 ARP) to 10.00% effective January 1, 2016, (b) from 10.00% to 8.30%, effective January 1, 2020, and (c) from 8.30% to 5.30%, effective January 1, 2021 (provided that the ROE in no case will be less than Georgia Power's average cost of long-term debt); (viii) reduced the ROE used for AFUDC equity for Plant Vogtle Units 3 and 4 from 10.00% to Georgia Power's average cost of long-term debt, effective January 1, 2018; and (ix) agreed that upon Unit 3 reaching commercial operation, retail base rates would be adjusted to include carrying costs on those capital costs deemed prudent in the Vogtle Cost Settlement Agreement. The January 11, 2018 order also stated that if Plant Vogtle Units 3 and 4 are not commercially operational by June 1, 2021 and June 1, 2022, respectively, the ROE used to calculate the NCCR tariff will be further reduced by 10 basis points each month (but not lower than Georgia Power's average cost of long-term debt) until the respective unitUnit is commercially operational. The ROE reductions negatively impacted earnings by approximately $100 million, $25 million, and $20 million in 2018, 2017, and 2016, and $25 million in 2017respectively, and are estimated to have negative earnings impacts of approximately $120$75 million in 20182019 and an aggregate of $585approximately $615 million from 20192020 to 2022.
In its January 11, 2018 order, the Georgia PSC also stated if other certain conditions change and assumptions upon which Georgia Power's seventeenth VCM report are based do not materialize, both Georgia Power and the Georgia PSC reservereserved the right to reconsider the decision to continue construction.
On February 12, 2018, Georgia Interfaith Power & Light, Inc. (GIPL) and Partnership for Southern Equity, Inc. (PSE) filed a petition appealing the Georgia PSC's January 11, 2018 order with the Fulton County Superior Court. On March 8, 2018, Georgia Watch filed a similar appeal to the Fulton County Superior Court for judicial review of the Georgia PSC's decision and denial of Georgia Watch's motion for reconsideration. On December 21, 2018, the Fulton County Superior Court granted Georgia Power's motion to dismiss the two appeals. On January 9, 2019, GIPL, PSE, and Georgia Watch filed an appeal of this decision with the Georgia Court of Appeals. Georgia Power believes the appeal has no merit; however, an adverse outcome in thisthe appeal combined with subsequent adverse action by the Georgia PSC could have a material impact on Southern Company's results of operations, financial condition, and liquidity.
The IRS allocated PTCsIn preparation for its nineteenth VCM filing, Georgia Power requested Southern Nuclear to eachperform a full cost reforecast for the project. This reforecast, performed prior to the nineteenth VCM filing, resulted in a $0.7 billion increase to the base capital cost forecast reported in the second quarter 2018. This base cost increase primarily resulted from changed assumptions related to the finalization of contract scopes and management responsibilities for Bechtel and over 60 subcontractors, labor productivity rates, and craft labor incentives, as well as the related levels of project management, oversight, and support, including field supervision and engineering support.
Although Georgia Power believes these incremental costs are reasonable and necessary to complete the project and the Georgia PSC's order in the seventeenth VCM proceeding specifically states that the construction of Plant Vogtle Units 3 and 4 which originally requiredis not subject to a cost cap, Georgia Power did not seek rate recovery for these cost increases included in the applicable unitcurrent base capital cost forecast (or any related financing costs) in the nineteenth VCM report. In connection with future VCM filings, Georgia Power may request the Georgia PSC to be placedevaluate costs currently included in service before 2021. Under the Bipartisan Budget Actconstruction contingency estimate for rate recovery as and when they are appropriately included in the base capital cost forecast. After considering the significant level of 2018, Plant Vogtle Units 3 and 4 continueuncertainty that exists regarding the future recoverability of costs included in the construction contingency estimate since the ultimate outcome of these matters is subject to qualify for PTCs. The nominal valuethe outcome of future assessments by management, as well as Georgia Power's portionPSC decisions in these future regulatory proceedings, Georgia Power recorded a total pre-tax charge to income of the PTCs is approximately $500 million per unit.$1.1 billion ($0.8 billion after
    Table of Contents                                Index to Financial Statements        

MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS (continued)
Southern Company and Subsidiary Companies 20172018 Annual Report


Intax) in the second quarter 2018, which includes the total increase in the base capital cost forecast and construction contingency estimate.
On August 31, 2018, Georgia Power filed its January 11, 2018 order,nineteenth VCM report with the Georgia PSC, also approved $542which requested approval of $578 million of construction capital costs incurred during the seventeenth VCM reporting period (Januaryfrom January 1, 2017 to2018 through June 30, 2017). The2018. On February 19, 2019, the Georgia PSC approved the nineteenth VCM, but deferred approval of $51.6 million of expenditures related to Georgia Power's portion of an administrative claim filed in the Westinghouse bankruptcy proceedings. Through the nineteenth VCM, the Georgia PSC has approved seventeen VCM reports covering the periods through June 30, 2017, including total construction capital costs incurred through that dateJune 30, 2018 of $4.4 billion. Georgia Power expects to file its eighteenth VCM report on February 28, 2018 requesting approval of approximately $450 million of construction capital costs$5.4 billion (before payments received under the Guarantee Settlement Agreement and the Customer Refunds) incurred from July 1, 2017 through December 31, 2017. Georgia Power's CWIP balance for Plant Vogtle Units 3 and 4 was approximately $4.8$1.7 billion as of December 31, 2017, or $3.3 billion net of payments received under the Guarantee Settlement Agreement and approximately $188 million in related Customer Refunds). In addition, the Customer Refunds.staff of the Georgia PSC requested, and Georgia Power agreed, to file its twentieth VCM report concurrently with the twenty-first VCM report by August 31, 2019.
The ultimate outcome of these matters cannot be determined at this time.
Cost and ScheduleDOE Financing
Georgia Power's approximate proportionate share of the remaining estimated capital cost to complete Plant Vogtle Units 3 and 4 with in service dates of November 2021 and November 2022, respectively, is as follows:
 (in billions)
Project capital cost forecast$7.3
Net investment as of December 31, 2017(3.4)
Remaining estimate to complete$3.9
Note: Excludes financing costs capitalized through AFUDC and is net of payments received under the Guarantee Settlement Agreement and the Customer Refunds.
Georgia Power estimates that its financing costs for construction of Plant Vogtle Units 3 and 4 will total approximately $3.1 billion, of which $1.6 billion had been incurred throughAt December 31, 2017.
As construction continues, challenges with management of contractors, subcontractors, and vendors, labor productivity and availability, fabrication, delivery, assembly, and installation of plant systems, structures, and components (some of which are based on new technology and have not yet operated in the global nuclear industry at this scale), or other issues could arise and change the projected schedule and estimated cost.
There have been technical and procedural challenges to the construction and licensing of Plant Vogtle Units 3 and 4 at the federal and state level and additional challenges may arise. Processes are in place that are designed to assure compliance with the requirements specified in the Westinghouse Design Control Document and the combined construction and operating licenses, including inspections by Southern Nuclear and the NRC that occur throughout construction. As a result of such compliance processes, certain license amendment requests have been filed and approved or are pending before the NRC. Various design and other licensing-based compliance matters, including the timely resolution of Inspections, Tests, Analyses, and Acceptance Criteria and the related approvals by the NRC, may arise, which may result in additional license amendments or require other resolution. If any license amendment requests or other licensing-based compliance issues are not resolved in a timely manner, there may be delays in the project schedule that could result in increased costs.
The ultimate outcome of these matters cannot be determined at this time.
Other Matters
As of December 31, 2017,2018, Georgia Power had borrowed $2.6 billion related to Plant Vogtle Units 3 and 4 costs through the Loan Guarantee Agreement and a multi-advance credit facility among Georgia Power, the DOE, and the FFB, which provides for borrowings of up to $3.46 billion, subject to the satisfaction of certain conditions. OnIn September 28, 2017, the DOE issued a conditional commitment to Georgia Power for up to approximately $1.67 billion in additional guaranteed loans under the Loan Guarantee Agreement. ThisIn September 2018, the DOE extended the conditional commitment expires on June 30, 2018, subject to anyMarch 31, 2019. Any further extension must be approved by the DOE. Final approval and issuance of these additional loan guarantees by the DOE cannot be assured and are subject to the negotiation of definitive agreements, completion of due diligence by the DOE, receipt of any necessary regulatory approvals, and satisfaction of other conditions. See Note 68 to the financial statements under "DOE"Long-term DebtDOE Loan Guarantee Borrowings"Borrowings" for additional information, including applicable covenants, events of default, mandatory prepayment events (including any decision not to continue construction of Plant Vogtle Units 3 and 4), and conditions to borrowing.
The ultimate outcome of these matters cannot be determined at this time.

MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS (continued)
Southern Company and Subsidiary Companies 2017 Annual Report


Income Tax Matters
Federal Tax Reform Legislation
OnIn December 22, 2017, the Tax Reform Legislation was signed into law and became effective on January 1, 2018. The Tax Reform Legislation, among other things, reducesreduced the federal corporate income tax rate to 21%, retainsretained normalization provisions for public utility property and existing renewable energy incentives, and repealsrepealed the corporate alternative minimum tax.
For businesses other than regulated utilities, the Tax Reform Legislation allows 100% bonus depreciation of qualified property acquired and placed in service between September 28, 2017 and January 1, 2023 and phases down by 20% each year until completely phased out for qualified property placed in service after December 31, 2027. Further, the business interest deduction is limited to 30% of taxable income excluding interest, net operating loss (NOL) carryforwards, and depreciation and amortization through December 31, 2021, and thereafter to 30% of taxable income excluding interest and NOL carryforwards.
Regulated utility businesses, including the majority of the operations of the traditional electric operating companies and the natural gas distribution companies, can continue deducting all business interest expense and are not eligible for bonus depreciation on capital assets acquired and placed in service after September 27, 2017. Projects with binding contracts before September 28, 2017 and placed in service after September 27, 2017 remain eligible for bonus depreciation under the Protecting Americans from Tax Hikes (PATH) Act.
In addition, under the Tax Reform Legislation, NOLs generated after December 31, 2017 can no longer be carried back to previous tax years but can be carried forward indefinitely, with utilization limited to 80% of taxable income of the subsequent tax year. The projected reduction of the consolidated income tax liability resulting from the tax rate reduction also delays the expected utilization of existing tax credit carryforwards.
ForFollowing the year ended December 31, 2017, implementationenactment of the Tax Reform Legislation, resultedthe SEC staff issued Staff Accounting Bulletin 118 – "Income Tax Accounting Implications of the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act" (SAB 118), which provided for a measurement period of up to one year from the enactment date to complete accounting under GAAP for the tax effects of the legislation. Due to the complex and comprehensive nature of the enacted tax law changes and their application under GAAP, Southern Company considered all amounts recorded in an estimatedthe financial statements as a result of the Tax Reform Legislation "provisional" as discussed in SAB 118 and subject to revision prior to filing its 2017 tax return in the fourth quarter 2018. Southern Company recognized tax benefits of $30 million and $264 million in 2018 and 2017, respectively, for a total net tax benefit of $264$294 million as a $0.4 billionresult of the Tax Reform Legislation. In addition, in total, Southern Company recorded a $417 million decrease in regulatory assets and a $6.9$6.2 billion increase in regulatory liabilities as a result of the Tax Reform Legislation and $16 million of stranded excess deferred tax balances in AOCI at December 31, 2017 were adjusted through retained earnings in 2018. As of December 31, 2018, Southern Company considered the measurement of impacts from the Tax Reform Legislation on deferred income tax assets and liabilities, primarily due to the impact of the reduction of the corporate income tax rate, on deferred tax assets and liabilities. Also,to be complete.
However, the OCI ending balance at December 31, 2017 includes $30 million of stranded excess deferred tax balances, which will be adjusted through retained earnings in subsequent periods.
The Tax Reform Legislation is subjectIRS continues to issue regulations that provide further interpretation and guidance fromon the IRS, as well aslaw and each respective state's adoption.adoption of the provisions contained in the Tax Reform Legislation remains uncertain. In addition, the regulatory treatment of certain impacts of the Tax Reform Legislation is subject to the discretion of the FERC and relevant stateeach state's regulatory bodies. On January 31, 2018, SCS, on behalfcommission. The ultimate impact of the traditional electric operating companies, filed with the FERC a reduction to the open access transmission tariff charge for 2018 to reflect the revised federal corporate income tax rate.these matters cannot be determined at this time. See Note 32 to the financial statements under "Regulatory Matters" for additional information regarding the traditional electric operating companies' and the natural gas distribution utilities' rate filings, including

MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS (continued)
Southern Company and Subsidiary Companies 2018 Annual Report


amounts returned to customers during 2018, to reflect the impacts of the Tax Reform Legislation.
On February 9, 2018, the Bipartisan Budget Act of 2018 was signed into law. Included in the tax extenders portion of the law were provisions extending PTCs on advanced nuclear power facilities and ITCs on qualified fuel cells. A subsidiary of PowerSecure installed fuel cells in 2017 which are expected to qualify for approximately $80 million of ITCs; however, the impact of the related tax benefits would be substantially offset by additional required payments under the applicable purchase contracts. Should Southern Company have a NOL in 2018, all of these ITCs may not be fully realized in 2018. See Note 3 to the financial statements under "Nuclear Construction" for additional information on the PTCs relating to advanced nuclear power facilities.
See Also see FINANCIAL CONDITION AND LIQUIDITY – "Credit Rating Risk" herein and Note 510 to the financial statements under "Current and Deferred Income Taxes" for additional information.
The ultimate outcome of these matters cannot be determined at this time.
Bonus Depreciation
Under the Tax Reform Legislation, projects with binding contracts prior to September 28, 2017 and placed in service after September 27, 2017 remain eligible for bonus depreciation under the PATH Act. The PATH Act allowed for 50% bonus depreciation for 2015 through 2017, 40% bonus depreciation for 2018, and 30% bonus depreciation for 2019 and certain long-lived assets placed in service in 2020. Based on provisional estimates, bonus depreciation is expected to result in positive cash flows of approximately $870 million for the 2017 tax year and approximately $290$300 million for the 2018 tax year. Should Southern Company have a NOL in 2018, all of these cash flows may not be fully realized in 2018. All projectedyear and approximately $130 million for the 2019 tax benefits previously received for bonus depreciation related to the Kemper IGCC were repaid in connection with third quarter 2017 estimated tax payments. Additionally, Southern Company will record an abandonment loss on its 2018 corporate income tax return, which may

MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS (continued)
Southern Company and Subsidiary Companies 2017 Annual Report


not be fully realized should Southern Company have a NOL in 2018. See Notes 3 and 5 to the financial statements under "Kemper County Energy Facility" and "Current and Deferred Income TaxesNet Operating Loss," respectively, for additional information.year. The ultimate outcome of these mattersthis matter cannot be determined at this time.
Tax Credits
The Tax Reform Legislation retained the renewable energy incentives that were included in the PATH Act. The PATH Act allows for 30% ITC for solar projects that commence construction by December 31, 2019; 26% ITC for solar projects that commence construction in 2020; 22% ITC for solar projects that commence construction in 2021; and a permanent 10% ITC for solar projects that commence construction on or after January 1, 2022. In addition, the PATH Act allows for 100% PTC for wind projects that commenced construction in 2016; 80% PTC for wind projects that commenced construction in 2017; 60% PTC for wind projects that commencecommenced construction in 2018;2018 and 40% PTC for wind projects that commence construction in 2019. Wind projects commencing construction after 2019 will not be entitled to any PTCs. TheSouthern Company has received ITCs and PTCs in connection with investments in solar, wind, and biomass facilities primarily at Southern Power and Georgia Power. See Note 1 to the financial statements under "Income and Other Taxes""Income Taxes" and Note 510 to the financial statements under "Current"Current and Deferred Income TaxesTax Credit Carryforwards"Carryforwards" for additional information regarding the utilization and amortization of credits and the tax benefit related to basis differences.
Southern Power
In September 2017, Southern Power began a legal entity reorganization of various direct and indirect subsidiaries that own and operate substantially all of its solar facilities, including certain subsidiaries owned in partnership with various third parties. The reorganization is expected to be substantially completed in the first quarter 2018 and is expected to result in estimated tax benefits totaling between $50 million and $55 million related to certain changes in state apportionment rates and net operating loss carryforward utilization that will be recorded in the first quarter 2018. Southern Power is pursuing the sale of a 33% equity interest in the newly-formed holding company owning these solar assets. The ultimate outcome of this matter cannot be determined at this time.
Other Matters
Southern Company and its subsidiaries are involved in various other matters being litigated and regulatory matters that could affect future earnings. In addition, Southern Company and its subsidiaries are subject to certain claims and legal actions arising in the ordinary course of business. The business activities of Southern Company's subsidiaries are subject to extensive governmental regulation related to public health and the environment, such as regulationlaws and regulations governing air, water, land, and protection of air emissions and water discharges.other natural resources. Litigation over environmental issues and claims of various types, including property damage, personal injury, common law nuisance, and citizen enforcement of environmental requirements, such as standards for air, water, land,laws and protection of other natural resources,regulations, has occurred throughout the U.S. This litigation has included claims for damages alleged to have been caused by CO2 and other emissions, CCR, and alleged exposure to hazardous materials, and/or requests for injunctive relief in connection with such matters.
The ultimate outcome of such pending or potential litigation or regulatory matters cannot be predicted at this time; however, for current proceedings not specifically reported herein or in NoteNotes 2 and 3 to the financial statements, management does not anticipate that the ultimate liabilities, if any, arising from such current proceedings would have a material effect on Southern Company's financial statements. See NoteNotes 2 and 3 to the financial statements for a discussion of various other contingencies, regulatory matters, and other matters being litigated which may affect future earnings potential.
In 2016, the SEC began conducting a formal investigation of Southern Company and Mississippi Power concerning the estimated costs and expected in-service date of the Kemper County energy facility. On November 30, 2017, the SEC staff notified Southern Company that it had concluded its investigation with no recommended enforcement action.
Litigation
OnIn January 20, 2017, a purportedputative securities class action complaint was filed against Southern Company, certain of its officers, and certain former Mississippi Power officers in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Georgia, Atlanta Division, by Monroe County Employees' Retirement System on behalf of all persons who purchased shares of Southern Company's common stock between April 25, 2012 and October 29, 2013. The complaint alleges that Southern Company, certain of its officers, and certain former Mississippi Power officers made materially false and misleading statements regarding the Kemper County energy facility in violation of certain provisions under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. The complaint seeks, among other things, compensatory damages and litigation costs and attorneys' fees. OnIn June 12, 2017, the plaintiffs filed an amended complaint that provided additional detail about their claims, increased the purported class period by one day, and added certain other former Mississippi Power officers as defendants. In July 2017, the defendants filed a motion to dismiss the plaintiffs' amended complaint with prejudice, to which the plaintiffs filed an opposition in September 2017. On March 29, 2018, the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Georgia, Atlanta Division, issued an order granting, in part, the defendants' motion to dismiss. The court dismissed certain claims against certain officers of Southern Company and Mississippi Power and dismissed the allegations related to a number of the statements that plaintiffs challenged as being false or misleading. On April 26, 2018, the
    Table of Contents                                Index to Financial Statements        

MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS (continued)
Southern Company and Subsidiary Companies 20172018 Annual Report


other former Mississippi Power officers as defendants. On July 27, 2017, the defendants filed a motion for reconsideration of the court's order, seeking dismissal of the remaining claims in the lawsuit. On August 10, 2018, the court denied the motion for reconsideration and denied a motion to dismisscertify the plaintiffs' amended complaint with prejudice, to which the plaintiffs filed an opposition on September 11, 2017.issue for interlocutory appeal.
OnIn February 27, 2017, Jean Vineyard filed a shareholder derivative lawsuit and, in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Georgia that names as defendants Southern Company, certain of its directors, certain of its officers, and certain former Mississippi Power officers. The complaint alleges that the defendants caused Southern Company to make false or misleading statements regarding the Kemper County energy facility cost and schedule. Further, the complaint alleges that the defendants were unjustly enriched and caused the waste of corporate assets. The plaintiff seeks to recover, on behalf of Southern Company, unspecified actual damages and, on her own behalf, attorneys' fees and costs in bringing the lawsuit. The plaintiff also seeks certain changes to Southern Company's corporate governance and internal processes. On March 27, 2017, the court deferred this lawsuit until 30 days after certain further action in the purported securities class action complaint discussed above.
On May 15, 2017, Helen E. Piper Survivor's Trust filed a shareholder derivative lawsuit in the Superior Court of Gwinnett County, State of Georgia and, on May 31, 2017, Judy Mesirov filed a shareholder derivative lawsuit, each in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Georgia. Each of these lawsuits names as defendants Southern Company, certain of its directors, certain of its officers, and certain former Mississippi Power officers. In August 2017, these two shareholder derivative lawsuits were consolidated in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Georgia. The complaints allege that the defendants caused Southern Company to make false or misleading statements regarding the Kemper County energy facility cost and schedule. Further, the complaints allege that the defendants were unjustly enriched and caused the waste of corporate assets and also allege that the individual defendants violated their fiduciary duties. Each plaintiff seeks to recover, on behalf of Southern Company, unspecified actual damages and, on each plaintiff's own behalf, attorneys' fees and costs in bringing the lawsuit. Each plaintiff also seeks certain changes to Southern Company's corporate governance and internal processes. On April 25, 2018, the court entered an order staying this lawsuit until 30 days after the resolution of any dispositive motions or any settlement, whichever is earlier, in the putative securities class action.
In May 2017, Helen E. Piper Survivor's Trust filed a shareholder derivative lawsuit in the Superior Court of Gwinnett County, State of Georgia that names as defendants Southern Company, certain of its directors, certain of its officers, and certain former Mississippi Power officers. The complaint alleges that the individual defendants, among other things, breached their fiduciary duties in connection with schedule delays and cost overruns associated with the construction of the Kemper County energy facility. EachThe complaint further alleges that the individual defendants authorized or failed to correct false and misleading statements regarding the Kemper County energy facility schedule and cost and failed to implement necessary internal controls to prevent harm to Southern Company. EachThe plaintiff seeks to recover, on behalf of Southern Company, unspecified actual damages and disgorgement of profits and, on its behalf, attorneys' fees and costs in bringing the lawsuit. EachThe plaintiff also seeks certain unspecified changes to Southern Company's corporate governance and internal processes. On August 15, 2017, these two shareholder derivative lawsuits were consolidated in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Georgia andMay 4, 2018, the court deferred the consolidated caseentered an order staying this lawsuit until 30 days after certain further actionthe resolution of any dispositive motions or any settlement, whichever is earlier, in the purportedputative securities class action complaint discussed above.action.
On May 18, 2018, Southern Company and Mississippi Power received a notice of dispute and arbitration demand filed by Martin Product Sales, LLC (Martin) based on two agreements, both related to Kemper IGCC byproducts for which Mississippi Power provided termination notices in September 2017. Martin alleges breach of contract, breach of good faith and fair dealing, fraud and misrepresentation, and civil conspiracy and makes a claim for damages in the amount of approximately $143 million, as well as additional unspecified damages, attorney's fees, costs, and interest. In the first quarter 2019, Mississippi Power and Southern Company filed motions to dismiss.
Southern Company believes these legal challenges have no merit; however, an adverse outcome in any of these proceedings could have an impact on Southern Company's results of operations, financial condition, and liquidity. Southern Company will vigorously defend itself in these matters, the ultimate outcome of which cannot be determined at this time.
Investments in Leveraged Leases
A subsidiary of Southern Holdings has several leveraged lease agreements, with original terms ranging up to 45 years, which relate to international and domestic energy generation, distribution, and transportation assets. Southern Company receives federal income tax deductions for depreciation and amortization, as well as interest on long-term debt related to these investments. Southern Company reviews all important lease assumptions at least annually, or more frequently if events or changes in circumstances indicate that a change in assumptions has occurred or may occur. These assumptions include the effective tax rate, the residual value, the credit quality of the lessees, and the timing of expected tax cash flows. See Note 1 to the financial statements under "Leveraged Leases" for additional information.
The ability of the lessees to make required payments to the Southern Holdings subsidiary is dependent on the operational performance of the assets. In the last six months of 2017, the financial and operational performance of one of the lessees and the associated generation assets has raised significant concerns about the short-term ability of the generation assets to produce cash flows sufficient to support ongoing operations and the lessee's contractual obligations and its ability to make the remaining semi-annual lease payments to the Southern Holdings subsidiary beginning in June 2018. As a result of operational improvements in 2018, the 2018 lease payments were paid in full. However, operational issues and the resulting cash liquidity challenges persist and significant concerns continue regarding the lessee's ability to make the remaining semi-annual lease payments. These operational challenges may also impact the expected residual value of the assets at the end of the lease term in 2047. If the June 2018 (or any future)future lease payment is not paid in full, the Southern Holdings subsidiary may be unable to make its corresponding payment to the holders of the underlying non-recourse debt related to the generation assets. Failure to make the required payment to the debtholders wouldcould represent an event of default that would give the debtholders the right to foreclose on, and take ownership of, the generation assets from the

MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS (continued)
Southern Company and Subsidiary Companies 2018 Annual Report


Southern Holdings subsidiary, in effect terminating the lease and resulting in the write-off of the related lease receivable, which hadwould result in a balancereduction in net income of approximately $86 million as ofafter tax based on the lease receivable balance at December 31, 2017.2018. Southern Company has evaluated the recoverability of the lease receivable and the expected residual value of the generation assets at the end of the lease under various scenarios and has concluded that its investment in the leveraged lease is not impaired as ofat December 31, 2017.2018. Southern Company will continue to monitor the operational performance of the underlying assets and evaluate the ability of the lessee to continue to make the required lease payments, including the lease payment due in June 2018.payments. The ultimate outcome of this matter cannot be determined at this time.
Mississippi Power
TableIn conjunction with Southern Company's sale of ContentsIndexGulf Power, Mississippi Power and Gulf Power have committed to Financial Statementsseek a restructuring of their 50% undivided ownership interests in Plant Daniel such that each of them would, after the restructuring, own 100% of a generating unit. On January 15, 2019, Gulf Power provided notice to Mississippi Power that Gulf Power will retire its share of the generating capacity of Plant Daniel on January 15, 2024. Mississippi Power has the option to purchase Gulf Power's ownership interest for $1 on January 15, 2024, provided that Mississippi Power exercises the option no later than 120 days prior to that date. Mississippi Power is assessing the potential operational and economic effects of Gulf Power's notice. The ultimate outcome of these matters remains subject to completion of Mississippi Power's evaluations and applicable regulatory approvals, including the FERC and the Mississippi PSC, and cannot now be determined. See Note 15 to the financial statements under "Southern Company's Sale of Gulf Power" for information regarding the sale of Gulf Power.

Southern Power
MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS (continued)On January 29, 2019, Pacific Gas & Electric Company (PG&E) filed petitions to reorganize under Chapter 11 of the U.S. Bankruptcy Code. Southern Power, together with its noncontrolling partners, owns four solar facilities where PG&E is the energy off-taker for approximately 207 MWs of capacity under long-term PPAs. PG&E is also the transmission provider for these facilities and two of Southern Power's other solar facilities. Southern Power has evaluated the recoverability of its investments in these solar facilities under various scenarios, including selling the related energy into the competitive markets, and has concluded they are not impaired. At December 31, 2018, Southern Power had outstanding accounts receivables due from PG&E of $1 million related to the PPAs and $36 million related to the transmission interconnections. Southern Company does not expect a material impact to its financial statements if, as a result of the bankruptcy proceedings, PG&E does not perform in accordance with the PPAs or the terms of the PPAs are renegotiated; however, the ultimate outcome of this matter cannot be determined at this time.
Southern Company and Subsidiary Companies 2017 Annual Report


Natural Gas Storage
A wholly-owned subsidiary of Southern Company Gas owns and operates a natural gas storage facility consisting of two salt dome caverns in Louisiana. Periodic integrity tests are required in accordance with rules of the Louisiana Department of Natural Resources (DNR). In August 2017, in connection with an ongoing integrity project, updated seismic mapping indicated the proximity of one of the caverns to the edge of the salt dome may be less than the required minimum and could result in Southern Company Gas retiring the cavern early. At December 31, 2017,2018, the facility's property, plant, and equipment had a net book value of $112$109 million, of which the cavern itself represents approximately 20%. A potential early retirement of this cavern is dependent upon several factors including compliance with an order from the Louisiana DNR detailing the requirements to place the cavern back in service, which includes, among other things, obtaining core samples to determine the composition of the sheath surrounding the edge of the salt dome.
The cavern continues to maintain its pressures and overall structural integrity. Southern Company Gas intends to monitor the cavern and comply with the Louisiana DNR order through 2020 and place the cavern back in service in 2021. These events were considered in connection with Southern Company Gas' annual long-lived asset impairment analysis, which determined there was no impairment as of December 31, 2017.2018. Any changes in results of monitoring activities, rates at which expiring capacity contracts are re-contracted, timing of placing the cavern back in service, or Louisiana DNR requirements could trigger impairment. Further, early retirement of the cavern could trigger impairment of other long-lived assets associated with the natural gas storage facility. The ultimate outcome of this matter cannot be determined at this time, but could have a significant impact on Southern Company's financial statements.
ACCOUNTING POLICIES
Application of Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates
Southern Company prepares its consolidated financial statements in accordance with GAAP. Significant accounting policies are described in NoteNotes 1, 5, and 6 to the financial statements. In the application of these policies, certain estimates are made that may
Table of ContentsIndex to Financial Statements

MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS (continued)
Southern Company and Subsidiary Companies 2018 Annual Report


have a material impact on Southern Company's results of operations and related disclosures. Different assumptions and measurements could produce estimates that are significantly different from those recorded in the financial statements. Senior management has reviewed and discussed the following critical accounting policies and estimates with the Audit Committee of Southern Company's Board of Directors.
Utility Regulation
Southern Company's traditional electric operating companies and natural gas distribution utilities, which collectively comprised approximately 86%85% of Southern Company's total operating revenues for 2017,2018, are subject to retail regulation by their respective state PSCs or other applicable state regulatory agencies and wholesale regulation by the FERC. These regulatory agencies set the rates the traditional electric operating companies and the natural gas distribution utilities are permitted to charge customers based on allowable costs, including a reasonable ROE. As a result, the traditional electric operating companies and the natural gas distribution utilities apply accounting standards which require the financial statements to reflect the effects of rate regulation. Through the ratemaking process, the regulators may require the inclusion of costs or revenues in periods different than when they would be recognized by a non-regulated company. This treatment may result in the deferral of expenses and the recording of related regulatory assets based on anticipated future recovery through rates or the deferral of gains or creation of liabilities and the recording of related regulatory liabilities. The application of the accounting standards has a further effect on theSouthern Company's financial statements as a result of the estimates of allowable costs used in the ratemaking process. These estimates may differ from those actually incurred by the traditional electric operating companies and the natural gas distribution utilities; therefore, the accounting estimates inherent in specific costs such as depreciation, AROs, and pension and other postretirement benefits have less of a direct impact on theSouthern Company's results of operations and financial condition than they would on a non-regulated company. See Note 15 to the financial statements for information regarding the sale of Gulf Power and three of Southern Company Gas' natural gas distribution utilities.
As reflected in Note 12 to the financial statements under "Southern CompanyRegulatory Assets and Liabilities," significant regulatory assets and liabilities have been recorded. Management reviews the ultimate recoverability of these regulatory assets and any requirement to refund these regulatory liabilities based on applicable regulatory guidelines and GAAP. However, adverse legislative, judicial, or regulatory actions could materially impact the amounts of such regulatory assets and liabilities and could adversely impact theSouthern Company's financial statements.
Kemper County Energy FacilityEstimated Cost, Schedule, and Rate Recovery for the Construction of Plant Vogtle Units 3 and 4
For periods priorIn 2016, the Georgia PSC approved the Vogtle Cost Settlement Agreement, which resolved certain prudency matters in connection with Georgia Power's fifteenth VCM report. In December 2017, the Georgia PSC approved Georgia Power's seventeenth VCM report, which included a recommendation to continue construction of Plant Vogtle Units 3 and 4, with Southern Nuclear serving as project manager and Bechtel serving as the primary construction contractor, as well as a modification of the Vogtle Cost Settlement Agreement. The Georgia PSC's related order stated that under the modified Vogtle Cost Settlement Agreement, (i) none of the $3.3 billion of costs incurred through December 31, 2015 should be disallowed as imprudent; (ii) capital costs incurred up to $5.68 billion would be presumed to be reasonable and prudent with the burden of proof on any party challenging such costs; (iii) Georgia Power would have the burden of proof to show that any capital costs above $5.68 billion were prudent; (iv) Georgia Power's total project capital cost forecast of $7.3 billion (net of $1.7 billion received under the Guarantee Settlement Agreement and approximately $188 million in related Customer Refunds) was found reasonable and did not represent a cost cap; and (v) prudence decisions would be made subsequent to achieving fuel load for Unit 4.
In its order, the Georgia PSC also stated if other conditions change and assumptions upon which Georgia Power's seventeenth VCM report are based do not materialize, the Georgia PSC reserved the right to reconsider the decision to continue construction.
In the second quarter 2017,2018, Georgia Power revised its base cost forecast and estimated contingency to complete construction and start-up of Plant Vogtle Units 3 and 4 to $8.0 billion and $0.4 billion, respectively, for a total project capital cost forecast of $8.4 billion (net of $1.7 billion received under the Guarantee Settlement Agreement and approximately $188 million in related Customer Refunds). Although Georgia Power believes these incremental costs are reasonable and necessary to complete the project and the Georgia PSC's order in the seventeenth VCM proceeding specifically states that the construction of Plant Vogtle Units 3 and 4 is not subject to a cost cap, Georgia Power did not seek rate recovery for the $0.7 billion increase in costs included in the current base capital cost forecast in the nineteenth VCM report. In connection with future VCM filings, Georgia Power may request the Georgia PSC to evaluate costs currently included in the construction contingency estimate for rate recovery as and when they are appropriately included in the base capital cost forecast. After considering the significant accounting estimateslevel of uncertainty that exists regarding the future recoverability of costs included Kemper County energy facility estimatedin the construction costs, project completion date, and rate recovery. Mississippi Power recorded total pre-tax chargescontingency estimate since the ultimate outcome of these matters is subject to income relatedthe outcome of future assessments by management, as well as Georgia PSC decisions in these future
    Table of Contents                                Index to Financial Statements        

MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS (continued)
Southern Company and Subsidiary Companies 20172018 Annual Report


regulatory proceedings, Georgia Power recorded a total pre-tax charge to the Kemper County energy facilityincome of $428 million$1.1 billion ($264 million0.8 billion after tax) in 2016, $365 million ($226 million after tax)the second quarter 2018.
Georgia Power's revised cost estimate reflects an expected in-service date of November 2021 for Unit 3 and November 2022 for Unit 4.
As construction continues, challenges with management of contractors, subcontractors, and vendors; labor productivity, availability, and/or cost escalation; procurement, fabrication, delivery, assembly, and/or installation and testing, including any required engineering changes, of plant systems, structures, and components (some of which are based on new technology that only recently began initial operation in 2015, $868 million ($536 million after tax)the global nuclear industry at this scale); or other issues could arise and change the projected schedule and estimated cost. Monthly construction production targets required to maintain the current project schedule will continue to increase significantly throughout 2019. To meet these increasing monthly targets, existing craft construction productivity must improve and additional craft laborers must be retained and deployed.
Georgia Power and Southern Nuclear believe it is a leading practice in 2014,connection with a construction project of this size and $1.2 billion ($729 million after tax)complexity to periodically validate recent construction progress in prior years.comparison to the projected schedule and to verify and update quantities of commodities remaining to install, labor productivity, and forecasted staffing needs. This verification process, led by Southern Nuclear, was underway as of December 31, 2018 and is expected to be completed during the second quarter 2019. Georgia Power currently does not anticipate any material changes to the total estimated project capital cost forecast for Plant Vogtle Units 3 and 4 or the expected in-service dates of November 2021 and November 2022, respectively, resulting from this verification process. However, the ultimate impact on cost and schedule, if any, will not be known until the verification process is completed. Georgia Power is required to report the results and any project impacts to the Georgia PSC by May 15, 2019.
There have been technical and procedural challenges to the construction and licensing of Plant Vogtle Units 3 and 4 at the federal and state level and additional challenges may arise. Processes are in place that are designed to assure compliance with the requirements specified in the Westinghouse Design Control Document and the combined construction and operating licenses, including inspections by Southern Nuclear and the NRC that occur throughout construction. As a result of such compliance processes, certain license amendment requests have been filed and approved or are pending before the Mississippi PSC's June 21, 2017 stated intentNRC. Various design and other licensing-based compliance matters, including the timely resolution of ITAAC and the related approvals by the NRC, may arise, which may result in additional license amendments or require other resolution. If any license amendment requests or other licensing-based compliance issues are not resolved in a timely manner, there may be delays in the project schedule that could result in increased costs.
The ultimate outcome of these matters cannot be determined at this time. Any extension of the in-service dates of November 2021 for Unit 3 and November 2022 for Unit 4 is currently estimated to issue an order (which occurredresult in additional base capital costs of approximately $50 million per month, based on July 6, 2017) directing MississippiGeorgia Power's ownership interests, and AFUDC of approximately $12 million per month. While Georgia Power is not precluded from seeking recovery of any future capital cost forecast increase, management will ultimately determine whether or not to pursue a settlement under whichseek recovery. Any further changes to the Kemper County energy facility wouldcapital cost forecast that are not expected to be operated as a natural gas plant rather than an IGCC plant,recoverable through regulated rates will be required to be charged to income and such charges could be material.
Given the significant complexity involved in estimating the future costs to complete construction and start-up of Plant Vogtle Units 3 and 4 and the significant management judgment necessary to assess the related uncertainties surrounding future rate recovery of any projected cost increases, as well as Mississippi Power's June 28, 2017 suspensionthe potential impact on Southern Company's results of the operationoperations and start-up of the gasifier portion of the Kemper County energy facility, the estimated construction costs and project completion date are no longer considered significantcash flows, Southern Company considers these items to be critical accounting estimates.
Given the Mississippi PSC's stated intent regarding no further rate increase for the Kemper County energy facility and the subsequent suspension, cost recovery of the gasifier portions became no longer probable; therefore, Mississippi Power recorded an additional charge to income in June 2017 of $2.8 billion ($2.0 billion after tax), which included estimated costs associated with the gasifier portions of the plant and lignite mine. During the third and fourth quarters of 2017, Mississippi Power recorded charges to income of $242 million ($206 million after tax), including $164 million for ongoing project costs, estimated mine and gasifier-related costs, and certain termination costs during the suspension period prior to conclusion of the Kemper Settlement Docket, as well as a charge of $78 million associated with the Kemper Settlement Agreement.
In the aggregate, since the Kemper County energy facility project started, Mississippi Power has incurred charges of $6.20 billion ($4.14 billion after tax) through December 31, 2017. See Note 14 to the financial statements for additional information on the individual charges by quarter.
As a result of the Mississippi PSC order on February 6, 2018, rate recovery for the Kemper County energy facility is resolved, subject to any future legal challenges, and no longer represents a critical accounting estimate.
See Note 32 to the financial statements under "Kemper County Energy FacilityGeorgia PowerNuclear Construction" for additional information.
Accounting for Income Taxes
The consolidated income tax provision and deferred income tax assets and liabilities, as well as any unrecognized tax benefits and valuation allowances, require significant judgment and estimates. These estimates are supported by historical tax return data, reasonable projections of taxable income, and interpretations of applicable tax laws and regulations across multiple taxing jurisdictions. The effective tax rate reflects the statutory tax rates and calculated apportionments for the various states in which the Southern Company system operates.
Southern Company files a consolidated federal income tax return and various state income tax returns, some of which are combined or unitary. Under a joint consolidated income tax allocation agreement, each Southern Company subsidiary's current and deferred tax expense is computed on a stand-alone basis and no subsidiary is allocated more current expense than would be paid if it filed a separate income tax return. Certain deductions and credits can be limited at the consolidated or combined level resulting in NOL and tax credit carryforwards that would not otherwise result on a stand-alone basis. Utilization of NOL and tax credit carryforwards and the assessment of valuation allowances are based on significant judgment and extensive analysis of the
Table of ContentsIndex to Financial Statements

MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS (continued)
Southern Company and Subsidiary Companies 2018 Annual Report


Southern Company's current financial position and result of operations, including currently available information about future years, to estimate when future taxable income will be realized.
Current and deferred state income tax liabilities and assets are estimated based on laws of multiple states that determine the income to be apportioned to their jurisdictions. States utilize various formulas to calculate the apportionment of taxable income, primarily using sales, assets, or payroll within the jurisdiction compared to the consolidated totals. In addition, each state varies as to whether a stand-alone, combined, or unitary filing methodology is required. The calculation of deferred state taxes considers apportionment factors and filing methodologies that are expected to apply in future years. The apportionments and methodologies which are ultimately finalized in a manner inconsistent with expectations could have a material effect on Southern Company's financial statements.
Given the significant judgment involved in estimating NOL and tax credit carryforwards and multi-state apportionments for all subsidiaries, Southern Company considers federal and state deferred income tax liabilities and assets to be critical accounting estimates.
Federal Tax Reform Legislation
Following the enactment of the Tax Reform Legislation, the SEC staff issued Staff Accounting Bulletin 118 – "Income Tax Accounting Implications of the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act" (SAB 118), which provides for a measurement period of up to one year from the enactment date to complete accounting under GAAP for the tax effects of the legislation. Due to the complex and comprehensive nature of the enacted tax law changes, and their application under GAAP, Southern Company considers all amounts recorded in the financial statements as a result of the Tax Reform Legislation to be "provisional" as discussed in SAB 118 and subject to revision. Southern Company is awaiting additional guidance from industry and income tax authorities in order
Table of ContentsIndex to Financial Statements

MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS (continued)
Southern Company and Subsidiary Companies 2017 Annual Report


to finalize its accounting. The ultimate impact of the Tax Reform Legislation on deferred income tax assets and liabilities and the related regulatory assets and liabilities cannot be determined at this time. See FUTURE EARNINGS POTENTIAL – "Income Tax Matters – Federal Tax Reform Legislation" herein and Notes 3 and 5 to the financial statements under "Regulatory Matters" and "Current and Deferred Income Taxes," respectively, for additional information.
Asset Retirement Obligations
AROs are computed as the fair value of the estimated ultimate costs for an asset's future retirement and are recorded in the period in which the liability is incurred. The estimated costs are capitalized as part of the related long-lived asset and depreciated over the asset's useful life. In the absence of quoted market prices, AROs are estimated using present value techniques in which estimates of future cash outlays associated with the asset retirements are discounted using a credit-adjusted risk-free rate. Estimates of the timing and amounts of future cash outlays are based on projections of when and how the assets will be retired and the cost of future removal activities.
The liability for AROs primarily relates to facilities that are subject to the CCR Rule and the related state rules, principally ash ponds, and the decommissioning of the Southern Company system's nuclear facilities – Alabama Power's Plant Farley and Georgia Power's ownership interests in Plant Hatch and Plant Vogtle Units 1 and 2. In addition, the Southern Company system has retirement obligationsAROs related to various landfill sites, asbestos removal, mine reclamation, land restoration related to solar and wind facilities, and disposal of polychlorinated biphenyls in certain transformers.
The traditional electric operating companies and Southern Company systemGas also hashave identified retirement obligations, such as obligations related to certain electric transmission and distribution facilities, certain asbestos containing material within long-term assets not subject to ongoing repair and maintenance activities, certain wireless communication towers, the disposal of polychlorinated biphenyls in certain transformers, leasehold improvements, equipment on customer property, and property associated with the Southern Company system's rail lines and natural gas pipelines, and certain structures authorized by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers.pipelines. However, liabilities for the removal of these assets have not been recorded as the fair value of the retirement obligations cannot be reasonably estimated. A liability for these AROsretirement obligations will be recognized when sufficient information becomes available to support a reasonable estimation of the ARO.retirement obligation.
The cost estimates for AROs related to the disposal of CCR are based on information using various assumptions related to closure and post-closure costs, timing of future cash outlays, inflation and discount rates, and the potential methods for complying with the CCR RuleRule. During 2018, Alabama Power and Georgia Power recorded increases of approximately $1.2 billion and $3.1 billion, respectively, to their AROs related to the disposal of CCR and increases of approximately $300 million and $130 million, respectively, to their AROs related to updated nuclear decommissioning cost site studies. Alabama Power's CCR-related update resulted from feasibility studies performed on ash ponds in use at the plants it operates, which indicated that additional closure costs, primarily related to increases in estimated ash volume, water management requirements, for closure. As further analysis is performed and design revisions, will be required to close these ash ponds under the planned closure-in-place methodology. Georgia Power's CCR-related update resulted from a strategic assessment which indicated additional closure details are developed,costs will be required to close its ash ponds, primarily due to changes in closure strategies, the estimated amount of ash to be excavated, and additional water management requirements necessary to support closure strategies. The traditional electric operating companies will continueexpect to periodically update thesetheir ARO cost estimates as necessary.estimates. See FUTURE EARNINGS POTENTIAL – "Environmental MattersEnvironmental Laws and RegulationsCoal Combustion Residuals" herein and Note 16 to the financial statements under "Asset Retirement Obligations and Other Costs of Removal" and "Nuclear Decommissioning" for additional information.
Given the significant judgment involved in estimating AROs, Southern Company considers the liabilities for AROs to be critical accounting estimates.
Pension and Other Postretirement Benefits
Southern Company's calculation of pension and other postretirement benefits expense is dependent on a number of assumptions. These assumptions include discount rates, healthcare cost trend rates, expected long-term return on plan assets, mortality rates, expected salary and wage increases, and other factors. Components of pension and other postretirement benefits expense include
Table of ContentsIndex to Financial Statements

MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS (continued)
Southern Company and Subsidiary Companies 2018 Annual Report


interest and service cost on the pension and other postretirement benefit plans, expected return on plan assets, and amortization of certain unrecognized costs and obligations. Actual results that differ from the assumptions utilized are accumulated and amortized over future periods and, therefore, generally affect recognized expense and the recorded obligation in future periods. While theSouthern Company believes that the assumptions used are appropriate, differences in actual experience or significant changes in assumptions would affect its pension and other postretirement benefitsbenefit costs and obligations.
Key elements in determining Southern Company's pension and other postretirement benefit expense are the expected long-term return on plan assets and the discount rate used to measure the benefit plan obligations and the periodic benefit plan expense for future periods. The expected long-term return on pension and other postretirement benefit plan assets is based on Southern Company's investment strategy, historical experience, and expectations for long-term rates of return that consider external actuarial advice. Southern Company determines the long-term return on plan assets by applying the long-term rate of expected returns on various asset classes to Southern Company's target asset allocation. For purposes of determining its liability related to the pension and other postretirement benefit plans, Southern Company discounts the future related cash flows using a single-point discount rate for each plan developed from the weighted average of market-observed yields for high quality fixed income securities with maturities that correspond to expected benefit payments. For 2015 and prior years, Southern Company computed the interest cost component of its net periodic pension and other postretirement benefit plan expense using the same single-point discount rate. Beginning in 2016, Southern Company adopted a full yield curve approach for calculating the interest cost component whereby the discount rate for each year is applied to the liability for that specific year. As a result, the interest cost
Table of ContentsIndex to Financial Statements

MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS (continued)
Southern Company and Subsidiary Companies 2017 Annual Report


component of net periodic pension and other postretirement benefit plan expense decreased by approximately $96 million in 2016.
The following table illustrates the sensitivity to changes in Southern Company's long-term assumptions with respect to the assumed discount rate, the assumed salaries,salary increases, and the assumed long-term rate of return on plan assets:
Change in AssumptionIncrease/(Decrease) in Total Benefit Expense for 20182019 Increase/(Decrease) in Projected Obligation for Pension Plan at December 31, 20172018 Increase/(Decrease) in Projected Obligation for Other Postretirement Benefit Plans at December 31, 20172018
 (in millions)
25 basis point change in discount rate$40/37/$(38)(36) $504/434/$(476)(411) $68/50/$(65)(48)
25 basis point change in salaries$24/11/$(23)(11) $119/105/$(115)(101) $–/$–
25 basis point change in long-term return on plan assets$33/$(33) N/A N/A
N/A – Not applicable
See Note 211 to the financial statements for additional information regarding pension and other postretirement benefits.
Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets
The acquisition method of accounting requires the assets acquired and liabilities assumed to be recorded at the date of acquisition at their respective estimated fair values. Southern Company recognizes goodwill as of the acquisition date, as a residual over the fair values of the identifiable net assets acquired. Goodwill is tested for impairment on an annual basis in the fourth quarter of the year as well as on an interim basis as events and changes in circumstances occur. Primarily as a result of the acquisitions of Southern Company Gas and PowerSecure in 2016, goodwill totaled approximately $6.3$5.3 billion at December 31, 2017.2018. As a result of the Southern Company Gas Dispositions, goodwill was reduced by $910 million during 2018. In addition, Southern Company Gas recorded a $42 million goodwill impairment charge in 2018 in contemplation of the sale of Pivotal Home Solutions.
Definite-lived intangible assets acquired are amortized over the estimated useful lives of the respective assets to reflect the pattern in which the economic benefits of the intangible assets are consumed. Whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of the intangible assets may not be recoverable, the intangible assets will be reviewed for impairment. Primarily as a result of the acquisitions of Southern Company Gas and PowerSecure and PPA fair value adjustments resulting from Southern Power's acquisitions, other intangible assets, net of amortization totaled approximately $873$613 million at December 31, 2017.2018.
The judgments made in determining the estimated fair value assigned to each class of assets acquired and liabilities assumed, as well as asset lives, can significantly impact Southern Company's results of operations. Fair values and useful lives are determined based on, among other factors, the expected future period of benefit of the asset, the various characteristics of the asset, and projected cash flows. As the determination of an asset's fair value and useful life involves management making certain estimates and because these estimates form the basis for the determination of whether or not an impairment charge should be recorded, Southern Company considers these estimates to be critical accounting estimates.
See Note 1 to the financial statements under "Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets and Liabilities" for additional information regarding Southern Company's goodwill and other intangible assets and Note 1215 to the financial statements for additional
Table of ContentsIndex to Financial Statements

MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS (continued)
Southern Company and Subsidiary Companies 2018 Annual Report


information related to Southern Company's recent2016 acquisitions of Southern Company Gas and proposed dispositions.PowerSecure, as well as the Southern Company Gas Dispositions.
Derivatives and Hedging Activities
Derivative instruments are recorded on the balance sheets as either assets or liabilities measured at their fair value, unless the transactions qualify for the normal purchases or normal sales scope exception and are instead subject to traditional accrual accounting. For those transactions that do not qualify as a normal purchase or normal sale, changes in the derivatives' fair values are recognized concurrently in earnings unless specific hedge accounting criteria are met. If the derivatives meet those criteria, derivative gains and losses offset related results of the hedged item in the income statement in the case of a fair value hedge, or gains and losses are deferred in OCI until the hedged transaction affects earnings in the case of a cash flow hedge. Certain subsidiaries of Southern Company enter into energy-related derivatives that are designated as regulatory hedges where gains and losses are initially recorded as regulatory liabilities and assets and then are included in fuel expense as the underlying fuel is used in operations and ultimately recovered through billings to customers.
Southern Company uses derivative instruments to reduce the impact to the results of operations due to the risk of changes in the price of natural gas, to manage fuel hedging programs per guidelines of state regulatory agencies, and to mitigate residual changes in the price of electricity, weather, interest rates, and foreign currency exchange rates. The fair value of commodity derivative
Table of ContentsIndex to Financial Statements

MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS (continued)
Southern Company and Subsidiary Companies 2017 Annual Report


instruments used to manage exposure to changing prices reflects the estimated amounts that Southern Company would receive or pay to terminate or close the contracts at the reporting date. To determine the fair value of the derivative instruments, Southern Company utilizes market data or assumptions that market participants would use in pricing the derivative asset or liability, including assumptions about risk and the risks inherent in the inputs of the valuation technique.
Southern Company classifies derivative assets and liabilities based on the lowest level of input that is significant to the fair value measurement. The assessment of the significance of a particular input to the fair value measurement requires judgment and may affect the valuation of fair value assets and liabilities and their placement within the fair value hierarchy. The determination of the fair value of the derivative instruments incorporates various required factors. These factors include:
the creditworthiness of the counterparties involved and the impact of credit enhancements (such as cash deposits and letters of credit);
events specific to a given counterparty; and
the impact of Southern Company's nonperformance risk on its liabilities.
Given the assumptions used in pricing the derivative asset or liability, Southern Company considers the valuation of derivative assets and liabilities a critical accounting estimate. See FINANCIAL CONDITION AND LIQUIDITY – "Market Price Risk" herein and Note 14 to the financial statements for more information.
Contingent Obligations
Southern Company is subject to a number of federal and state laws and regulations as well as other factors and conditions that subject it to environmental, litigation, income tax, and other risks. See FUTURE EARNINGS POTENTIAL herein and NoteNotes 2 and 3 to the financial statements for more information regarding certain of these contingencies. Southern Company periodically evaluates its exposure to such risks and records reserves for those matters where a non-tax-related loss is considered probable and reasonably estimable and records a tax asset or liability if it is more likely than not that a tax position will be sustained.estimable. The adequacy of reserves can be significantly affected by external events or conditions that can be unpredictable; thus, the ultimate outcome of such matters could materially affect Southern Company's results of operations, cash flows, or financial condition.
Recently Issued Accounting Standards
RevenueSee Note 1 to the financial statements under "Recently Adopted Accounting Standards" for additional information.
In 2014, the FASB issued ASC 606, Revenue from Contracts with Customers (ASC 606), replacing the existing accounting standard and industry specific guidance for revenue recognition with a five-step model for recognizing and measuring revenue from contracts with customers. The underlying principle of the new standard is to recognize revenue to depict the transfer of goods or services to customers at the amount expected to be collected. The new standard also requires enhanced disclosures regarding the nature, amount, timing, and uncertainty of revenue and the related cash flows arising from contracts with customers.
Most of Southern Company's revenue, including energy provided to customers, is from tariff offerings that provide electricity or natural gas without a defined contractual term, as well as longer-term contractual commitments, including PPAs and non-derivative natural gas asset management and optimization arrangements.
Southern Company has completed the evaluation of all revenue streams and determined that the adoption of ASC 606 will not change the current timing of revenue recognition for such transactions. Some revenue arrangements, such as certain PPAs, energy-related derivatives, and alternative revenue programs, are excluded from the scope of ASC 606 and, therefore, will be accounted for and disclosed or presented separately from revenues under ASC 606 on Southern Company's financial statements. Southern Company has concluded contributions in aid of construction are not in scope for ASC 606 and will continue to be accounted for as an offset to property, plant, and equipment.
The new standard is effective for reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2017. Southern Company applied the modified retrospective method of adoption effective January 1, 2018. Southern Company also utilized practical expedients which allowed it to apply the standard to open contracts at the date of adoption and to reflect the aggregate effect of all modifications when identifying performance obligations and allocating the transaction price for contracts modified before the effective date. Under the modified retrospective method of adoption, prior year reported results are not restated; however, a cumulative-effect adjustment to retained earnings at January 1, 2018 is recorded. In addition, quarterly disclosures will include comparative information on 2018 financial statement line items under current guidance. The adoption of ASC 606 did not result in a cumulative-effect adjustment.
Table of ContentsIndex to Financial Statements

MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS (continued)
Southern Company and Subsidiary Companies 2017 Annual Report


Leases
In February 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-02, Leases (Topic 842) (ASU 2016-02). ASU 2016-02 requires lessees to recognize on the balance sheet a lease liability and a right-of-use asset for all leases. ASU 2016-02 also changes the recognition, measurement, and presentation of expense associated with leases and provides clarification regarding the identification of certain components of contracts that would represent a lease. The accounting required by lessors is relatively unchanged and there is no change to the accounting for existing leveraged leases. ASU 2016-02 is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2018 and Southern Company will adoptadopted the new standard effective January 1, 2019.
Southern Company is currently implementing an information technology system along withelected the related changes to internal controls and accounting policies that will supporttransition methodology provided by ASU No. 2018-11, Leases (Topic 842): Targeted Improvements, whereby the accounting for leases under ASU 2016-02. In addition, Southern Company has substantially completed a detailed inventory and analysis of its leases. In terms of rental charges and duration of contracts, the most significant leases relate to cellular towers and PPAs where certain of Southern Company's subsidiaries are the lessee and to land and outdoor lighting where certain of Southern Company's subsidiaries are the lessor. The traditional electric operating companies are currently analyzing pole attachment agreements, and a lease determination has not been made at this time. While Southern Company has not yet determined the ultimate impact, adoptionrequirements of ASU 2016-02 is expected to have a significant impact on Southern Company's balance sheet.
Other
In November 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-18, Statement of Cash Flows (Topic 230): Restricted Cash (ASU 2016-18). ASU 2016-18 eliminates the need to reflect transfers between cash and restricted cash in operating, investing, and financing activities in the statement of cash flows. Upon adoption, the net change in cash and cash equivalents during the period will include amounts generally described as restricted cash or restricted cash equivalents. ASU 2016-18 is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2017, and will be applied retrospectively to each period presented. Southern Company adopted ASU 2016-18 effective January 1, 2018 with no material impact on its financial statements.
On January 26, 2017, the FASB issued ASU No. 2017-04, Intangibles – Goodwill and Other (Topic 350): Simplifying the Test for Goodwill Impairment (ASU 2017-04). ASU 2017-04 removes the requirement to compare the implied fair value of goodwill with the carrying amount as part of Step 2 of the goodwill impairment test. Under the new standard, the goodwill impairment loss will be measured as the excess of a reporting unit's carrying amount over its fair value, not exceeding the total amount of goodwill allocated to that reporting unit, which may increase the frequency of goodwill impairment charges if a future goodwill impairment test does not pass the Step 1 evaluation. ASU 2017-04 is effective prospectively for periods beginning on or after December 15, 2019, with early adoption permitted. Southern Company adopted ASU 2017-04 effective January 1, 2018 with no impact on its financial statements.
On March 10, 2017, the FASB issued ASU No. 2017-07, Compensation – Retirement Benefits (Topic 715): Improving the Presentation of Net Periodic Pension Cost and Net Periodic Postretirement Benefit Cost (ASU 2017-07). ASU 2017-07 requires that an employer report the service cost component in the same line item or items as other compensation costs and requires the other components of net periodic pension and postretirement benefit costs to be separately presented in the income statement outside of income from operations. Additionally, only the service cost component is eligible for capitalization, when applicable. However, all cost components remain eligible for capitalization under FERC regulations. ASU 2017-07 will be applied retrospectively for the presentation of the service cost component and the other components of net periodic pension and postretirement benefit costs in the income statement. The capitalization of only the service cost component of net periodic pension and postretirement benefit costs in assets will beare applied on a prospective basis. ASU 2017-07 is effective for periods beginning after December 15, 2017. The presentation changes required for net periodic pension and postretirement benefit costs will result in a decrease in Southern Company's operating income and an increase in other income for 2016 and 2017 and are expected to result in a decrease in operating income and an increase in other income for 2018.basis as of the adoption date of January 1, 2019, without restating prior periods. Southern Company adoptedelected the package of practical expedients provided by ASU 2017-07 effective January 1, 2018 with no material impact on its financial statements.2016-02
On August 28, 2017, the FASB issued ASU No. 2017-12, Derivatives and Hedging (Topic 815): Targeted Improvements to Accounting for Hedging Activities (ASU 2017-12), amending the hedge accounting recognition and presentation requirements. ASU 2017-12 makes more financial and non-financial hedging strategies eligible for hedge accounting, amends the related presentation and disclosure requirements, and simplifies hedge effectiveness assessment requirements. ASU 2017-12 is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2018, with early adoption permitted. Southern Company adopted ASU 2017-12 effective January 1, 2018 with no material impact on its financial statements.
    Table of Contents                                Index to Financial Statements        

MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS (continued)
Southern Company and Subsidiary Companies 20172018 Annual Report


that allows prior determinations of whether existing contracts are, or contain, leases and the classification of existing leases to continue without reassessment. Additionally, Southern Company applied the use-of-hindsight practical expedient in determining lease terms as of the date of adoption and elected the practical expedient that allows existing land easements not previously accounted for as leases not to be reassessed. Southern Company also made accounting policy elections to account for short-term leases in all asset classes as off-balance sheet leases and combined lease and non-lease components in the computations of lease obligations and right-of-use assets for most asset classes.
The Southern Company system completed the implementation of a new application to track and account for its leases and updated its internal controls and accounting policies to support the accounting for leases under ASU 2016-02. The Southern Company system completed its lease inventory and determined its most significant leases involve PPAs, real estate, and communication towers where certain of Southern Company's subsidiaries are the lessee and PPAs where certain of Southern Company's subsidiaries are the lessor. In the first quarter 2019, the adoption of ASU 2016-02 resulted in recording lease liabilities and right-of-use assets on Southern Company's balance sheet each totaling approximately $2.0 billion, with no impact on Southern Company's statement of income.
FINANCIAL CONDITION AND LIQUIDITY
Overview
Earnings in all periods presented were negatively affected by charges associated with the Kemper IGCC;plants under construction; however, Southern Company's financial condition remained stable at December 31, 2017.2018.
The Southern Company system's cash requirements primarily consist of funding ongoing operations, common stock dividends, capital expenditures, and debt maturities. The Southern Company system's capital expenditures and other investing activities include investments to meet projected long-term demand requirements, including to build new electric generation facilities, to maintain existing electric generation facilities, to comply with environmental regulations including adding environmental modifications to certain existing electric generating units and closures of ash ponds, to expand and improve electric transmission and distribution facilities, to update and expand natural gas distribution systems, and for restoration following major storms. Operating cash flows provide a substantial portion of the Southern Company system's cash needs. For the three-year period from 20182019 through 2020,2021, Southern Company's projected common stock dividends, capital expenditures, and debt maturities are expected to exceed operating cash flows. Southern Company plans to finance future cash needs in excess of its operating cash flows primarily by accessing borrowings from financial institutions and through debt and equity issuances in the capital markets. Southern Company intends to continue to monitor its access to short-term and long-term capital markets as well as bank credit arrangements to meet future capital and liquidity needs. See "Sources of Capital," "Financing Activities," and "Capital Requirements and Contractual Obligations" herein for additional information.
Southern Company's investments in the qualified pension plans and the nuclear decommissioning trust funds increaseddecreased in value as ofat December 31, 20172018 as compared to December 31, 2016.2017. No contributions to the qualified pension plan were made for the year ended December 31, 20172018 and no mandatory contributions to the qualified pension plans are anticipated during 2018.2019. See "Contractual Obligations" herein and Notes 16 and 211 to the financial statements under "Nuclear Decommissioning" and "Pension Plans," respectively, for additional information.
Net cash provided from operating activities in 20172018 totaled $6.4$6.9 billion, an increase of $1.5$0.6 billion from 2016.2017. The increase in net cash provided from operating activities was primarily due to the timing of vendor payments and increased fuel cost recovery. Net cash provided from operating activities in 2017 totaled $6.4 billion, an increase of $1.5 billion from 2016. Significant changes in operating cash flow for 2017 as compared to 2016 included increases of $1.2 billion related to operating activities of Southern Company Gas, which was acquired on July 1, 2016, and $1.0 billion related to voluntary contributions to the qualified pension plan in 2016, partially offset by the timing of vendor payments. Net cash provided from operating activities in 2016 totaled $4.9 billion, a decrease of $1.4 billion from 2015. Significant changes in operating cash flow for 2016 as compared to 2015 included approximately $1.0 billion of voluntary contributions to the qualified pension plan in 2016 and a $1.2 billion increase in unutilized ITCs and PTCs.
Net cash used for investing activities in 2018, 2017, and 2016 and 2015 totaled $5.8 billion, $7.2 billion, and $20.0 billion, respectively. The cash used for investing activities in 2018 was primarily due to the traditional electric operating companies' installation of equipment to comply with environmental standards and $7.3 billion, respectively.construction of electric generation, transmission, and distribution facilities and capital expenditures for Southern Company Gas' infrastructure replacement programs, partially offset by proceeds from the sale transactions described in Note 15 to the financial statements. The cash used for investing activities in 2017 was primarily due to the traditional electric operating companies' installation of equipment to comply with environmental standards and construction of electric generation, transmission, and distribution facilities, capital expenditures for Southern Company Gas' infrastructure replacement programs, and Southern Power's renewable acquisitions. The cash used for investing activities in 2016 was primarily due to the closing of the Merger, the acquisition of PowerSecure, Southern Company Gas' investment in SNG, the traditional electric operating companies' construction of electric generation, transmission, and distribution facilities and

MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS (continued)
Southern Company and Subsidiary Companies 2018 Annual Report


installation of equipment at electric generating facilities to comply with environmental standards, and Southern Power's acquisitions and construction of renewable facilities and a natural gas facility. The
Net cash used for investingfinancing activities totaled $1.8 billion in 2015 was2018 primarily due to the traditional electric operating companies' gross property additions for installationnet redemptions and repurchases of equipment at electric generating facilities to comply with environmental standardslong-term debt, common stock dividend payments, and constructiona decrease in commercial paper borrowings, partially offset by net issuances of electric generation, transmission, and distribution facilities,short-term bank debt, proceeds from Southern Power's acquisitionssales of non-controlling equity interests in entities indirectly owning substantially all of its solar facilities and purchaseseight of nuclear fuel.
its wind facilities, and the issuance of common stock. Net cash provided from financing activities totaled $1.0 billion in 2017 primarily due to net issuances of long-term and short-term debt, partially offset by common stock dividend payments. Net cash provided from financing activities totaled $15.7 billion in 2016 primarily due to issuances of long-term debt and common stock associated with completing the Merger and funding the subsidiaries' continuous construction programs, Southern Power's acquisitions, and Southern Company Gas' investment in SNG, partially offset by redemptions of long-term debt and common stock dividend payments. Net cash provided from financing activities totaled $1.7 billion in 2015 primarily due to issuances of long-term debt and common stock and an increase in short-term debt, partially offset by common stock dividend payments and redemptions of long-term debt and preferred and preference stock. Fluctuations in cash flow from financing activities vary from year to year based on capital needs and the maturity or redemption of securities.
Significant balance sheet changes in 20172018 included the reclassification of $5.7 billion and $3.3 billion in total assets and liabilities held for sale, respectively, primarily associated with Gulf Power, as well as decreases of $7.3$3.0 billion and $0.8$0.4 billion in accumulated deferred income taxestotal assets and deferred charges relatedliabilities, respectively, associated with the sales described in Note 15 to income taxes, respectively,the financial statements under "Southern Power" and "Southern Company Gas." Also see Note 15 to the financial statements under "Southern Company's Sale of Gulf Power" and "Assets Held for Sale" for additional information. After adjusting for these changes, other significant balance sheet changes included an increase of $7.0 billion in deferred credits related to

MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS (continued)
Southern Company and Subsidiary Companies 2017 Annual Report


income taxes primarily resulting from the impacts of the Tax Reform Legislation; an increase of $1.4$7.1 billion in total property, plant, and equipment primarily related to the $4.7 billion increase in AROs at Alabama Power and Georgia Power, as well as the traditional electric operating companies' installation of equipment to comply with environmental standards and construction of electric generation, transmission, and distribution facilities and Southern Company Gas' capital expenditures for infrastructure replacement programs, and Southern Power's renewable acquisitions, largelypartially offset by the $2.8 billion write-downsecond quarter 2018 charge related to the construction of the gasification portions of the Kemper County energy facilityPlant Vogtle Units 3 and payments of $1.7 billion received by Georgia Power under the Guarantee Settlement Agreement; an increase4; a decrease of $3.1 billion in long-term debt (including amounts due within one year) primarily to fundresulting from the Southern Company system's continuous construction programs and for general corporate purposes; and a decreaserepayment of $1.1long-term debt; an increase of $3.0 billion in total stockholder's equitynoncontrolling interests at Southern Power as a result of sales of interests in entities indirectly owning substantially all of its solar facilities and eight of its wind facilities; and an increase of $1.9 billion in other regulatory assets, deferred primarily related to the Kemper County energy facility charges, partially offset by the issuance of additional shares of common stock.AROs at Georgia Power. See FUTURE EARNINGS POTENTIAL – "Income Tax MattersFederal Tax Reform Legislation"Notes 2 and "Financing Activities" herein and Note 315 to the financial statements under "Georgia PowerNuclear Construction" and "Kemper County EnergySouthern PowerSales of Renewable Facility Interests," respectively, as well as Notes 6 and 8 to the financial statements and "Financing Activities" herein for additional information.
At the end of 2017,2018, the market price of Southern Company's common stock was $48.09$43.92 per share (based on the closing price as reported on the New York Stock Exchange)NYSE) and the book value was $23.99$23.91 per share, representing a market-to-book value ratio of 201%184%, compared to $49.19, $25.00,$48.09, $23.99, and 197%201%, respectively, at the end of 2016.2017.
Southern Company's consolidated ratio of common equity to total capitalization plus short-term debt was 31.5%32.5% and 33.3%31.5% at December 31, 20172018 and 2016,2017, respectively. See Note 68 to the financial statements for additional information.
Sources of Capital
Southern Company intends to meet its future capital needs through operating cash flows, borrowings from financial institutions, and debt and equity issuances in the capital markets. Equity capital can be provided from any combination of theSouthern Company's stock plans, private placements, or public offerings. The amount and timing of additional equity and debt issuances in 2018,2019, as well as in subsequent years, will be contingent on Southern Company's investment opportunities and the Southern Company system's capital requirements and will depend upon prevailing market conditions and other factors. See "Capital Requirements and Contractual Obligations" herein for additional information.
Except as described herein, the traditional electric operating companies, Southern Power, and Southern Company Gas plan to obtain the funds required for construction and other purposes from operating cash flows, external security issuances, borrowings from financial institutions, and equity contributions or loans from Southern Company. Southern Power also plans to utilize tax equity partnership contributions, as well as funds resulting from any potentialits pending sale of a 33% equity interest in a newly-formed holding company that owns substantially all of its solar assets, if completed. Southern Company Gas also plans to utilize the proceeds from the pending asset sales of two of its natural gas distribution utilities.Plant Mankato. However, the amount, type, and timing of any future financings, if needed, will depend upon prevailing market conditions, regulatory approval, and other factors. See FUTURE EARNINGS POTENTIALNote 15 to the financial statements under "Southern Power"General"Sales of Natural Gas Plants" herein for additional information.
In addition, in 2014, Georgia Power entered into the Loan Guarantee Agreement with the DOE, under which the proceeds of borrowings may be used to reimburse Georgia Power for Eligible Project Costs incurred in connection with its construction of Plant Vogtle Units 3 and 4. Under the Loan Guarantee Agreement, the DOE agreed to guarantee borrowings of up to $3.46 billion (not to exceed 70% of Eligible Project Costs) to be made by Georgia Power under a multi-advance credit facility (FFB Credit Facility) among Georgia Power, the DOE, and the FFB. As ofAt December 31, 2017,2018, Georgia Power had borrowed $2.6 billion under

MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS (continued)
Southern Company and Subsidiary Companies 2018 Annual Report


the FFB Credit Facility. OnIn July 27, 2017, Georgia Power entered into an amendment to the Loan Guarantee Agreement, which provides that further advances are conditioned upon the DOE's approval of any agreements entered into in replacement of the Vogtle 3 and 4 Agreement and satisfaction of certain other conditions.
OnIn September 28, 2017, the DOE issued a conditional commitment to Georgia Power for up to approximately $1.67 billion of additional guaranteed loans under the Loan Guarantee Agreement. This conditional commitment expires on June 30, 2018,March 31, 2019, subject to any further extension approved by the DOE. Final approval and issuance of these additional loan guarantees by the DOE cannot be assured and are subject to the negotiation of definitive agreements, completion of due diligence by the DOE, receipt of any necessary regulatory approvals, and satisfaction of other conditions. See Note 68 to the financial statements under "Long-term DebtDOE Loan Guarantee Borrowings" for additional information regarding the Loan Guarantee Agreement, including applicable covenants, events of default, mandatory prepayment events (including any decision not to continue construction of Plant Vogtle Units 3 and 4), and additional conditions to borrowing. Also see Note 32 to the financial statements under "Georgia PowerNuclear Construction" for additional information regarding Plant Vogtle Units 3 and 4.
The issuance of securities by the traditional electric operating companies and Nicor Gas is generally subject to the approval of the applicable state PSC or other applicable state regulatory agency. The issuance of all securities by Mississippi Power and short-term securities by Georgia Power is generally subject to regulatory approval by the FERC. Additionally, with respect to the public offering of securities, Southern Company and certain of its subsidiaries file registration statements with the SEC under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (1933 Act). The amounts of securities authorized by the appropriate regulatory authorities, as

MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS (continued)
Southern Company and Subsidiary Companies 2017 Annual Report


well as the securities registered under the 1933 Act, are continuously monitored and appropriate filings are made to ensure flexibility in the capital markets.
Southern Company, each traditional electric operating company, and Southern Power generally obtain financing separately without credit support from any affiliate. The Southern Company system does not maintain a centralized cash or money pool. Therefore, funds of each company are not commingled with funds of any other company in the Southern Company system.
In addition, Southern Company Gas Capital obtains external financing for Southern Company Gas and its subsidiaries, other than Nicor Gas, which obtains financing separately without credit support from any affiliates. Nicor Gas' commercial paper program supports its working capital needs as Nicor Gas is not permitted to make money pool loans to affiliates. All of the other Southern Company Gas subsidiaries benefit from Southern Company Gas Capital's commercial paper program.
See Note 68 to the financial statements under "Bank Credit Arrangements" for additional information.
As ofAt December 31, 2017,2018, Southern Company's current liabilities exceeded current assets by $3.5$4.7 billion, primarily due to $3.9$3.2 billion of long-term debt that is due within one year (comprised of(including approximately $1.0$1.3 billion at the parent company, $0.9$0.2 billion at Alabama Power, $0.6 billion at Georgia Power, $1.0 billion at Mississippi Power, $0.8$0.6 billion at Southern Power, and $0.2$0.4 billion at Southern Company Gas) and $2.4$2.9 billion of notes payable (comprised of(including approximately $0.6$1.8 billion at the parent company, $0.2$0.3 billion at Georgia Power, $0.1 billion at Southern Power, and $1.5$0.7 billion at Southern Company Gas). Subsequent to December 31, 2018, using proceeds from the sale of Gulf Power, the Southern Company parent entity repaid $0.7 billion of its long-term debt due within one year and all $1.8 billion of its notes payable at December 31, 2018. See "Financing Activities" herein for additional information. To meet short-term cash needs and contingencies, the Southern Company system has substantial cash flow from operating activities and access to capital markets and financial institutions. Southern Company, the traditional electric operating companies, Southern Power, and Southern Company Gas intend to utilize operating cash flows, as well as commercial paper, lines of credit, bank notes, and securities issuances, as market conditions permit, as well as, under certain circumstances for the traditional electric operating companies, Southern Power, and Southern Company Gas, equity contributions and/or loans from Southern Company to meet their short-term capital needs.

MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS (continued)
Southern Company and Subsidiary Companies 2018 Annual Report


At December 31, 2017,2018, Southern Company and its subsidiaries had approximately $2.1$1.4 billion of cash and cash equivalents. Committed credit arrangements with banks at December 31, 20172018 were as follows:
Expires   Executable Term Loans Expires Within One YearExpires   Executable Term Loans Expires Within One Year
Company2018
2019
2020 2022 Total Unused 
One
Year
 
Two
Years
 Term Out No Term Out2019
2020
2022 Total 
Unused(d)
 
One
Year
 
Two
Years
 Term Out No Term Out
(in millions)(in millions)
Southern Company(a)
$
 $
 $
 $2,000
 $2,000
 $1,999
 $
 $
 $
 $
$
 $
 $2,000
 $2,000
 $1,999
 $
 $
 $
 $
Alabama Power35
 
 500
 800
 1,335
 1,335
 
 
 
 35
33
 500
 800
 1,333
 1,333
 
 
 
 33
Georgia Power
 
 
 1,750
 1,750
 1,732
 
 
 
 

 
 1,750
 1,750
 1,736
 
 
 
 
Gulf Power30
 25
 225
 
 280
 280
 45
 
 20
 10
Mississippi Power100
 
 
 
 100
 100
 
 
 
 100
100
 
 
 100
 100
 
 
 
 100
Southern Power Company(b)

 
 
 750
 750
 728
 
 
 
 
Southern Power(b)

 
 750
 750
 727
 
 
 
 
Southern Company Gas(c)

 
 
 1,900
 1,900
 1,890
 
 
 
 

 
 1,900
 1,900
 1,895
 
 
 
 
Other30
 
 
 
 30
 30
 20
 
 20
 10
30
 
 
 30
 30
 
 
 
 30
Southern Company Consolidated$195
 $25
 $725
 $7,200
 $8,145
 $8,094
 $65
 $
 $40
 $155
Southern Company Consolidated(e)
$163
 $500
 $7,200
 $7,863
 $7,820
 $
 $
 $
 $163
(a)Represents the Southern Company parent entity.
(b)Does not include Southern Power'sPower Company's $120 million continuing letter of credit facility for standby letters of credit expiring in 2019,2021, of which $19$17 million remainswas unused at December 31, 2017.2018. Southern Power's subsidiaries are not parties to its bank credit arrangement.
(c)Southern Company Gas, as the parent entity, guarantees the obligations of Southern Company Gas Capital, which is the borrower of $1.4 billion of these arrangements.this arrangement. Southern Company Gas' committed credit arrangementsarrangement also includeincludes $500 million for which Nicor Gas is the borrower and which is restricted for working capital needs of Nicor Gas. Pursuant to this multi-year credit arrangement, the allocations between Southern Company Gas Capital and Nicor Gas may be adjusted.
(d)Amounts used are for letters of credit.
(e)
Excludes $280 million of committed credit arrangements of Gulf Power, which was sold on January 1, 2019. See Note 15 to the financial statements under "Southern Company's Sale of Gulf Power" for additional information.
See Note 68 to the financial statements under "Bank Credit Arrangements" for additional information.
In May 2017, Southern Company, Alabama Power, Georgia Power, and Southern Power Company each amended certain of their multi-year credit arrangements, which, among other things, extended the maturity dates from 2020 to 2022. Southern Company and Southern Power Company increased their borrowing ability under these arrangements to $2.0 billion from $1.25 billion and to $750 million from $600 million, respectively. Southern Company also terminated its $1.0 billion facility maturing in 2018.

MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS (continued)
Southern Company and Subsidiary Companies 2017 Annual Report


Also in May 2017, Southern Company Gas Capital and Nicor Gas terminated their existing credit arrangements for $1.3 billion and $700 million, respectively, which were to mature in 2017 and 2018, and entered into a new multi-year credit arrangement with $1.4 billion and $500 million currently allocated to Southern Company Gas Capital and Nicor Gas, respectively, maturing in 2022. Pursuant to the new multi-year credit arrangement, the allocations between Southern Company Gas Capital and Nicor Gas may be adjusted. In September 2017, Alabama Power also amended its $500 million multi-year credit arrangement, which, among other things, extended the maturity date from 2018 to 2020. In November 2017, Gulf Power amended $195 million of its multi-year credit arrangements to extend the maturity dates from 2017 and 2018 to 2020 and Mississippi Power amended its one-year credit arrangements in an aggregate amount of $100 million to extend the maturity dates from 2017 to 2018.
Most of these bank credit arrangements, as well as the term loan arrangements of Southern Company, Alabama Power, Georgia Power, Mississippi Power and Southern Power Company, contain covenants that limit debt levels and contain cross-acceleration or cross-default provisions to other indebtedness (including guarantee obligations) that are restricted only to the indebtedness of the individual company. Such cross-default provisions to other indebtedness would trigger an event of default if the applicable borrower defaulted on indebtedness or guarantee obligations over a specified threshold. Such cross-acceleration provisions to other indebtedness would trigger an event of default if the applicable borrower defaulted on indebtedness, the payment of which was then accelerated. At December 31, 2017,2018, Southern Company, the traditional electric operating companies, Southern Power Company, Southern Company Gas, and Nicor Gas were in compliance with all such covenants. None of the bank credit arrangements contain material adverse change clauses at the time of borrowings.
Subject to applicable market conditions, Southern Company and its subsidiaries expect to renew or replace their bank credit arrangements as needed, prior to expiration. In connection therewith, Southern Company and its subsidiaries may extend the maturity dates and/or increase or decrease the lending commitments thereunder.
A portion of the unused credit with banks is allocated to provide liquidity support to the revenue bonds of the traditional electric operating companies and the commercial paper programs of Southern Company, the traditional electric operating companies, Southern Power Company, Southern Company Gas, and Nicor Gas. The amount of variable rate revenue bonds of the traditional electric operating companies outstanding requiring liquidity support as of December 31, 2017 was approximately $1.5 billion as compared to $1.9 billion at December 31, 2016.2018 was approximately $1.6 billion, which included $82 million related to Gulf Power. In addition, at December 31, 2017,2018, the traditional electric operating companies had approximately $714$403 million of revenue bonds outstanding that wereare required to be remarketed within the next 12 months. Subsequentmonths, which included $58 million related to December 31, 2017, $50 million of these revenue bonds of Mississippi Power which were in a long-term interest rate mode were remarketed in an index rate mode.
At December 31, 2017, Pivotal Utility Holdings, Inc., a subsidiary of Southern Company Gas, had $200 million of gas facility revenue bonds outstanding. The Elizabethtown Gas asset sale agreement requires that bonds representing $180 million of the total that are currently eligible for redemption at par be redeemed on or prior to consummation of the sale.Gulf Power. See FUTURE EARNINGS POTENTIAL – "General" herein and Note 615 to the financial statements under "Gas Facility Revenue Bonds""Southern Company's Sale of Gulf Power" for additional information.information regarding the sale of Gulf Power on January 1, 2019. Subsequent to December 31, 2018, Georgia Power redeemed approximately $108 million of obligations related to outstanding variable rate pollution control revenue bonds.
Southern Company, the traditional electric operating companies (other than Mississippi Power),Alabama Power, Georgia Power, Southern Power Company, Southern Company Gas, and Nicor Gas, and SEGCO make short-term borrowings primarily through commercial paper programs that have the liquidity support of the committed bank credit arrangements described above. Short-term borrowings are included in notes payable in the balance sheets.
    Table of Contents                                Index to Financial Statements        

MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS (continued)
Southern Company and Subsidiary Companies 20172018 Annual Report


Details of short-term borrowings were as follows:
Short-term Debt at the End of the Period 
Short-term Debt During the Period (*)
Short-term Debt at the End of the Period 
Short-term Debt During the Period (*)
Amount Outstanding Weighted Average Interest Rate Average Amount Outstanding Weighted Average Interest Rate Maximum Amount OutstandingAmount Outstanding Weighted Average Interest Rate Average Amount Outstanding Weighted Average Interest Rate Maximum Amount Outstanding
(in millions)   (in millions)   (in millions)(in millions)   (in millions)   (in millions)
December 31, 2018:         
Commercial paper$1,064
 3.0% $1,655
 2.3% $3,042
Short-term bank debt1,851
 3.1% 1,722
 2.9% 2,504
Total$2,915
 3.1% $3,377
 2.6%  
December 31, 2017:                  
Commercial paper$1,832
 1.8% $2,117
 1.3% $2,946
$1,832
 1.8% $2,117
 1.3% $2,946
Short-term bank debt607
 2.3% 555
 2.1% 1,020
607
 2.3% 555
 2.1% 1,020
Total$2,439
 1.9% $2,672
 1.5%  $2,439
 1.9% $2,672
 1.5%  
December 31, 2016:                  
Commercial paper$1,909
 1.1% $976
 0.8% $1,970
$1,909
 1.1% $976
 0.8% $1,970
Short-term bank debt123
 1.7% 176
 1.7% 500
123
 1.7% 176
 1.7% 500
Total$2,032
 1.1% $1,152
 1.1%  $2,032
 1.1% $1,152
 1.1%  
December 31, 2015:         
Commercial paper$740
 0.7% $842
 0.4% $1,563
Short-term bank debt500
 1.4% 444
 1.1% 795
Total$1,240
 0.9% $1,286
 0.5%  
(*)Average and maximum amounts are based upon daily balances during the 12-month periods ended December 31, 2018, 2017, 2016, and 2015.2016.
In addition to the short-term borrowings of Southern Power Company included in the table above, at December 31, 2016, and 2015, Southern Power Company subsidiaries hadassumed credit agreements (Project Credit Facilities) assumed with the acquisition of certain solar facilities, which were non-recourse to Southern Power Company, the proceeds of which were used to finance project costs related to such solar facilities. The Project Credit Facilities were fully repaid in January 2017. For the year ended December 31, 2016, the Project Credit Facilities had a maximum amount outstanding of $828 million and an average amount outstanding of $566 million at a weighted average interest rate of 2.1% and had total amounts outstanding of $209 million at a weighted average interest rate of 2.1% at December 31, 2016. For the year ended December 31, 2015, the Project Credit Facilities had a maximum amount outstanding of $137 million and an average amount outstanding of $13 million at a weighted average interest rate of 2.0% and had total amounts outstanding of $137 million at a weighted average interest rate of 2.0% at December 31, 2015.
Furthermore, in connection with the acquisition of a solar facility in July 2016, a subsidiary of Southern Power Company assumed a $217 million construction loan, which was fully repaid in September 2016. During this period, the credit agreement had a maximum amount outstanding of $217 million and an average amount outstanding of $137 million at a weighted average interest rate of 2.2%.
The Company believes the need for working capital can be adequately met by utilizing commercial paper programs, lines of credit, bank term loans, and operating cash flows.
Financing Activities
During 2017,2018, Southern Company issued approximately 14.611.6 million shares of common stock primarily through employee equity compensation plans and received proceeds of approximately $659$442 million.
In addition, during the secondthird and thirdfourth quarters of 2017,2018, Southern Company issued a total of approximately 2.712.1 million and 2.5 million shares, respectively, of common stock through at-the-market issuances pursuant to sales agency agreements related to Southern Company's continuous equity offering program and received cash proceeds of approximately $134$540 million and $108 million, respectively, net of $1.1$5 million and $1 million in fees and commissions.commissions, respectively.
    Table of Contents                                Index to Financial Statements        

MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS (continued)
Southern Company and Subsidiary Companies 20172018 Annual Report


The following table outlines the long-term debt financing activities for Southern Company and its subsidiaries for the year ended December 31, 2017:2018:
Company
Senior
Note
Issuances
 
Senior
Note
Maturities
and
Redemptions
 
Revenue
Bond
Issuances and
Reofferings
of Purchased
Bonds
 
Revenue
Bond
Maturities, Redemptions,
 and Repurchases
 
Other
Long-Term
Debt
Issuances
 
Other
Long-Term
Debt
Redemptions
and
Maturities(a)
Senior
Note
Issuances
 
Senior Note
Maturities, Redemptions, and Repurchases
 
Revenue
Bond
Issuances and
Reofferings
of Purchased
Bonds
 
Revenue
Bond
Maturities, Redemptions,
 and Repurchases
 
Other
Long-Term
Debt
Issuances
 
Other
Long-Term
Debt
Redemptions
and
Maturities(a)
(in millions)(in millions)
Southern Company(b)
$300
 $400
 $
 $
 $950
 $400
$750
 $1,000
 $
 $
 $
 $
Alabama Power1,100
 525
 
 36
 
 
500
 
 120
 120
 
 1
Georgia Power1,350
 450
 65
 65
 370
 17

 1,500
 108
 469
 
 111
Gulf Power300
 85
 
 
 6
 
Mississippi Power
 35
 
 
 40
 962
600
 155
 
 43
 
 900
Southern Power525
 500
 
 
 43
 18

 350
 
 
 
 420
Southern Company Gas(c)
450
 
 
 
 400
 22
Other
 
 
 
 
 15
Southern Company Gas
 155
 
 200
 300
 
Other(c)

 100
 
 
 100
 13
Elimination(d)

 
 
 
 (40) (602)
 
 
 
 
 (4)
Southern Company Consolidated$4,025
 $1,995
 $65
 $101
 $1,769
 $832
$1,850
 $3,260
 $228
 $832
 $400
 $1,441
(a)Includes reductions in capital lease obligations resulting from cash payments under capital leases.
(b)Represents the Southern Company parent entity.
(c)The senior notes were issued by Southern Company Gas Capital
In November 2018, SEGCO, as borrower, and guaranteed byAlabama Power, as guarantor, entered into a $100 million long-term delayed draw floating rate bank term loan bearing interest based on three-month LIBOR, which SEGCO used to repay at maturity $100 million aggregate principal amount of Series 2013A Senior Notes due December 1, 2018. See Note 9 to the Southern Company Gas parent entity. Other long-term debt issued represents first mortgage bonds issued by Nicor Gas.financial statements under "Guarantees" for additional information.
(d)Includes intercompany loans from Southern Company to Mississippi Power andRepresents reductions in affiliate capital lease obligations at Georgia Power. These transactionsPower, which are eliminated in Southern Company's Consolidated Financial Statements.consolidated financial statements.
Except as otherwise described herein, Southern Company and its subsidiaries used the proceeds of debt issuances for their redemptions and maturities shown in the table above, to repay short-term indebtedness, and for general corporate purposes, including working capital and,capital. The subsidiaries also used the proceeds for the subsidiaries, their continuous construction programs.
In March 2017, Southern Company repaid at maturity a $400 million 18-month floating rate bank loan.
In June 2017, Southern Company issued $500 million aggregate principal amount of Series 2017A 5.325% Junior Subordinated Notes due June 21, 2057 and $300 million aggregate principal amount of Series 2017A Floating Rate Senior Notes due September 30, 2020, which bear interest at a floating rate based on three-month LIBOR.
Also in June 2017,2018, Southern Company entered into two $100a $900 million aggregate principal amount short-term floating rate bank term loan agreements, which mature on June 21, 2018 and June 29, 2018 and bearbearing interest based on one-month LIBOR.LIBOR, which was repaid in August 2018.
In August 2017,April 2018, Southern Company borrowed $250 million pursuant to a short-term uncommitted bank credit arrangement, which bearsbearing interest at a rate agreed upon by Southern Company and the bank from time to time and is payable on no less than 30 days' demand by the bank. Subsequent to December 31, 2018, Southern Company repaid this loan.
Also in August 2017,In June 2018, Southern Company repaid at maturity $400two $100 million short-term floating rate bank term loans.
In August 2018, Southern Company issued $750 million aggregate principal amount of Series 2014A 1.30%2018A Floating Rate Senior Notes.Notes due February 14, 2020 bearing interest based on three-month LIBOR, entered into a $1.5 billion short-term floating rate bank loan bearing interest based on one-month LIBOR, and repaid $250 million borrowed in August 2017 pursuant to a short-term uncommitted bank credit arrangement. Subsequent to December 31, 2018, Southern Company repaid the $1.5 billion short-term floating rate bank loan.
In November 2017,the third quarter 2018, Southern Company issued $450repaid at maturity $500 million aggregate principal amount of 1.55% Senior Notes and $500 million aggregate principal amount of Series 2017B 5.25% Junior Subordinated2013A 2.45% Senior Notes.
Subsequent to December 31, 2018, through cash tender offers, Southern Company repurchased and retired approximately $522 million of the $1.0 billion aggregate principal amount outstanding of its 1.85% Senior Notes due DecemberJuly 1, 2077.
In September 2017, Alabama Power issued 102019 (1.85% Notes), approximately $180 million shares ($250of the $350 million aggregate stated capital)principal amount outstanding of 5.00% Class A Preferred Stock, Cumulative, Par Value $1 Per Share (Stated Capital $25 Per Share). The majorityits Series 2014B 2.15% Senior Notes due September 1, 2019 (Series 2014B Notes), and approximately $504 million of the proceeds were used in October 2017 to redeem all 2 million shares ($50$750 million aggregate stated capital)principal amount outstanding of Alabama Power's 6.50%its Series Preference Stock, 6 million shares ($150 million2018A Floating Rate Notes due February 14, 2020 (Series 2018A Notes), for an aggregate stated capital)purchase price, excluding accrued and unpaid interest, of Alabama Power's 6.45% Series Preference Stock, and 1.52 million shares ($38 million aggregate stated capital) of Alabama Power's 5.83% Class A Preferred Stock.
approximately $1.2 billion. In June 2017, Georgia Power entered into two short-term floating rate bank loans in aggregate principal amounts of $50 million and $150 million, with maturity dates ofaddition, subsequent to December 1, 2017 and May 31, 2018, respectively, and one long-term floating rate bankfollowing the completion of the cash tender offers, Southern Company completed the redemption of all of the Series 2018A Notes remaining outstanding and called for redemption all of the 1.85% Notes and Series 2014B Notes remaining outstanding.
    Table of Contents                                Index to Financial Statements        

MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS (continued)
Southern Company and Subsidiary Companies 20172018 Annual Report


loanSubsequent to December 31, 2018, Alabama Power repaid at maturity $200 million aggregate principal amount of $100 million, with a maturity date of June 28, 2018, which was amended in August 2017 to extend the maturity date to October 26, 2018. These loans bear interest based on one-month LIBOR. Also in June 2017, Georgia Power borrowed $500 million pursuant to a short-term uncommitted bank credit arrangement, which bears interest at a rate agreed upon by Georgia Power and the bank from time to time and is payable on no less than 30 days' demand by the bank.Series Z 5.125% Senior Notes.
In August 2017,January 2018, Georgia Power repaid its $50outstanding $150 million short-term floating rate bank loan due DecemberMay 31, 2018.
In May 2018, through cash tender offers, Georgia Power repurchased and retired $89 million of the $250 million aggregate principal amount outstanding of its Series 2007A 5.65% Senior Notes due March 1, 2017 and $2502037, $326 million of the $500 million aggregate principal amount outstanding pursuant toof its uncommitted bank credit arrangement. In December 2017, Georgia Power repaidSeries 2009A 5.95% Senior Notes due February 1, 2039, and $335 million of the remaining $250$600 million aggregate principal amount outstanding pursuant toof its uncommitted bank credit arrangement.Series 2010B 5.40% Senior Notes due June 1, 2040, for an aggregate purchase price, excluding accrued and unpaid interest, of $902 million.
Subsequent to December 31, 2017,2018, Georgia Power repaid its outstanding $150redeemed approximately $13 million, $20 million, and $100 million floating rate bank loans due May 31, 2018 and October 26, 2018, respectively.
As reflected in the table above under other long-term debt issuances, in September 2017, Georgia Power also issued $270$75 million aggregate principal amount of Development Authority of Burke County (Georgia) Pollution Control Revenue Bonds (Georgia Power Company Plant Vogtle Project), First Series 2017A 5.00% Junior Subordinated Notes due October 1, 2077. The proceeds were used to redeem all 1.8 million shares ($45 million aggregate liquidation amount) of Georgia Power's 6.125%1992, Eighth Series Class A Preferred Stock1994, and 2.25 million shares ($225 million aggregate liquidation amount) of Georgia Power's 6.50%Second Series 2007A Preference Stock.1995, respectively.
In March 2017, Gulf2018, Mississippi Power extended the maturity of its $100entered into a $300 million short-term floating rate bank loan bearing interest based on one-month LIBOR, from April 2017 to October 2017of which $200 million was repaid in the second quarter 2018 and subsequently$100 million was repaid in the third quarter 2018. The proceeds of this loan, in May 2017.
A portion oftogether with the proceeds of GulfMississippi Power's $600 million senior notenotes issuances, waswere used in June 2017 to redeem 550,000 shares ($55repay Mississippi Power's $900 million aggregate liquidation amount) of Gulf Power's 6.00% Series Preference Stock, 450,000 shares ($45 million aggregate liquidation amount) of Gulf Power's Series 2007A 6.45% Preference Stock, and 500,000 shares ($50 million aggregate liquidation amount) of Gulf Power's Series 2013A 5.60% Preference Stock.unsecured floating rate term loan.
In June 2017,October 2018, Mississippi Power prepaid $300completed the redemption of all 334,210 outstanding shares of its preferred stock (as well as related depositary shares), with an aggregate par value of approximately $33.4 million.
In May 2018, Southern Power entered into two short-term floating rate bank loans, each for an aggregate principal amount of $100 million, which bear interest based on one-month LIBOR. In November 2018, Southern Power repaid one of these short-term loans.
During 2018, Southern Power received approximately $148 million of third-party tax equity related to certain of its renewable facilities. See Note 15 to the outstanding principal amountfinancial statements under its $1.2 billion unsecured term loan, which matures on March 30, 2018.
In September 2017, "Southern Power amended" for additional information.
Prior to its $60sale, in the second quarter 2018, Pivotal Utility Holdings caused $200 million aggregate principal amount floatingof gas facility revenue bonds to be redeemed.
In May 2018, Southern Company Gas Capital borrowed $95 million pursuant to a short-term uncommitted bank credit arrangement, guaranteed by Southern Company Gas, bearing interest at a rate term loanagreed upon by Southern Company Gas Capital and the bank from time to among other things, increasetime and payable on no less than 30 days' demand by the bank. In July 2018, Southern Company Gas Capital repaid this loan.
Other long-term debt issuances for Southern Company Gas include the issuance by Nicor Gas of $300 million aggregate principal amount toof first mortgage bonds in a private placement, of which $100 million was issued in August 2018 and extend the maturity date from September 2017 to October$200 million was issued in November 2018.
In addition to any financings that may be necessary to meet capital requirements and contractual obligations, Southern Company and its subsidiaries plan to continue, when economically feasible, a program to retire higher-cost securities and replace these obligations with lower-cost capital if market conditions permit.
Credit Rating Risk
At December 31, 2017,2018, Southern Company and its subsidiaries did not have any credit arrangements that would require material changes in payment schedules or terminations as a result of a credit rating downgrade.
There are certain contracts that could require collateral, but not accelerated payment, in the event of a credit rating change of certain subsidiaries to BBB and/or Baa2 or below. These contracts are for physical electricity and natural gas purchases and sales, fuel purchases, fuel transportation and storage, energy price risk management, transmission, interest rate management, and construction of new generation at Plant Vogtle Units 3 and 4.

MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS (continued)
Southern Company and Subsidiary Companies 2018 Annual Report


The maximum potential collateral requirements under these contracts at December 31, 20172018 were as follows:
Credit Ratings
Maximum
Potential
Collateral
Requirements
Maximum
Potential
Collateral
Requirements(a)
(in millions)(in millions)
At BBB and/or Baa2$40
$30
At BBB- and/or Baa3$665
$542
At BB+ and/or Ba1(*)
$2,390
At BB+ and/or Ba1(b)
$2,176
(*)(a)
Includes potential collateral requirements related to Gulf Power of $111 million and $221 million at a credit rating of BBB- and/or Baa3 and BB+ and/or Ba1, respectively. See Note 15 to the financial statements under "Southern Company's Sale of Gulf Power" for information regarding the sale of Gulf Power on January 1, 2019.
(b)Any additional credit rating downgrades at or below BB- and/or Ba3 could increase collateral requirements up to an additional $38 million.
Generally, collateral may be provided by a Southern Company guaranty, letter of credit, or cash. Additionally, a credit rating downgrade could impact the ability of Southern Company and its subsidiaries to access capital markets and would be likely to

MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS (continued)
Southern Company and Subsidiary Companies 2017 Annual Report


impact the cost at which they do so.
On March 1, 2017, Moody's downgraded the senior unsecured debt rating of Mississippi Power to Ba1 from Baa3.
On March 20, 2017, Moody's revised its rating outlook for Georgia Power from stable to negative.
On March 24, 2017, S&P revised its consolidated credit rating outlook for Southern Company and its subsidiaries (including the traditional electric operating companies, Southern Power, Southern Company Gas, Southern Company Gas Capital, and Nicor Gas) from stable to negative.
On March 30, 2017, Fitch Ratings, Inc. placed the ratings of Southern Company, Georgia Power, and Mississippi Power on rating watch negative.
On June 22, 2017, Moody's placed the ratings of Mississippi Power on review for downgrade. On September 21, 2017,February 26, 2018, Moody's revised its rating outlook for Mississippi Power from under reviewstable to stable.positive. On August 8, 2018, Moody's upgraded Mississippi Power's senior unsecured rating to Baa3 from Ba1 and maintained the positive rating outlook.
On January 19,February 28, 2018, Fitch removed Mississippi Power from rating watch negative and revised its rating outlook from stable to positive.
Also on February 28, 2018, Fitch downgraded the senior unsecured long-term debt rating of Southern Company to BBB+ from A- with a stable outlook and of Georgia Power to A from A+ with a negative outlook. On August 9, 2018, Fitch downgraded the senior unsecured long-term debt rating of Georgia Power to A- from A.
On March 14, 2018, S&P upgraded the senior unsecured long-term debt rating of Mississippi Power to A- from BBB+. The outlook remained negative.
On August 8, 2018, Moody's downgraded the senior unsecured debt rating of Georgia Power to Baa1 from A3.
On September 28, 2018, Moody's revised its rating outlooks for Southern Company, and Alabama Power, and Georgia Power from stablenegative to negative.stable.
While it is unclear howAlso on September 28, 2018, Fitch assigned a negative rating outlook to the credit rating agencies, the FERC,ratings of Southern Company and relevant state regulatory bodies may respond toits subsidiaries (excluding Mississippi Power).
As a result of the Tax Reform Legislation, certain financial metrics, such as the funds from operations to debt percentage, used by the credit rating agencies to assess Southern Company and its subsidiaries may be negatively impacted. Absent actions by Southern Company and most of its regulated subsidiaries have taken actions to mitigate the resulting impacts, which, among other alternatives, could include adjusting capital structure and/or monetizing regulatory assets,structure. Absent actions by Southern Company and its subsidiaries that fully mitigate the impacts, the credit ratings of Southern Company and certain of its subsidiaries could be negatively affected. See Note 32 to the financial statements for additional information related to state PSC or other regulatory agency actions related to the Tax Reform Legislation.Legislation, including approvals of capital structure adjustments for Alabama Power, Georgia Power, and Atlanta Gas Light by their respective state PSCs, which are expected to help mitigate the potential adverse impacts to certain of their credit metrics.
Market Price RiskCost of Natural Gas
The Southern Company system is exposed to market risks, including commodity price risk, interest rate risk, weather risk, and occasionally foreign currency exchange rate risk. To manage the volatility attributable to these exposures, the applicable company nets the exposures, where possible, to take advantage of natural offsets and enters into various derivative transactions for the remaining exposures pursuant to the applicable company's policies in areas such as counterparty exposure and risk management practices. Southern Company Gas' wholesale gas operations use various contracts in its commercial activities that generally meet the definition of derivatives. For the traditional electric operating companies, Southern Power, and Southern Company Gas' other businesses, each company's policy is that derivatives are to be used primarily for hedging purposes and mandates strict adherence to all applicable risk management policies. Derivative positions are monitored using techniques including, butExcluding Atlanta Gas Light, which does not limited to, market valuation, value at risk, stress testing, and sensitivity analysis.
To mitigate future exposure to a change in interest rates, Southern Company and certain of its subsidiaries enter into derivatives that have been designated as hedges. Derivatives that have been designated as hedges outstanding at December 31, 2017 have a notional amount of $3.7 billion and are intended to mitigate interest rate volatility related to existing fixed and floating rate obligations. The weighted average interest rate on $6.3 billion of long-term variable interest rate exposure at December 31, 2017 was 2.43%. If Southern Company sustained a 100 basis point change in interest rates for all long-term variable interest rate exposure, the change would affect annualized interest expense by approximately $63 million at December 31, 2017. See Note 1 to the financial statements under "Financial Instruments" and Note 11 to the financial statements for additional information.
Southern Power Company had foreign currency denominated debt of €1.1 billion at December 31, 2017. Southern Power Company has mitigated its exposure to foreign currency exchange rate risk through the use of foreign currency swaps converting all interest and principal payments to fixed-rate U.S. dollars.
Due to cost-based rate regulation and other various cost recovery mechanisms, the traditional electric operating companies andsell natural gas distribution utilities continue to have limited exposure to market volatility in interest rates, foreign currency exchange rates, commodity fuel prices, and prices of electricity. In addition, Southern Power's exposure to market volatility in commodity fuel prices and prices of electricity is limited because its long-term sales contracts shift substantially all fuel cost responsibility to the purchaser. However, Southern Power has been and may continue to be exposed to market volatility in energy-related commodity prices as a result of uncontracted generating capacity. To mitigate residual risks relative to movements in electricity prices, the traditional electric operating companies and Southern Power may enter into physical fixed-price contracts for the purchase and sale of electricity through the wholesale electricity market and, to a lesser extent, financial hedge contracts for natural gas purchases; however, a significant portion of contracts are priced at market. The traditional electric operating companies and certain ofend-use customers, the natural gas distribution utilities manage fuel-hedging programs implemented percharge their utility customers for natural gas consumed using natural gas cost recovery mechanisms set by the guidelines of their respective state PSCs or other applicable state regulatory agencies. Under these mechanisms, all prudently-incurred natural gas costs are passed through to customers without markup, subject to regulatory review. The natural gas distribution utilities defer or accrue the difference between the actual cost of natural gas and the amount of commodity revenue earned in a given period. The deferred or accrued amount is either billed or refunded to customers prospectively through adjustments to the commodity rate. Deferred natural gas costs are reflected as regulatory assets and accrued natural gas costs are reflected as regulatory liabilities. Therefore, gas costs recovered through natural gas revenues generally equal the amount expensed in cost of natural gas and do not affect net income from the natural gas distribution utilities. Cost of natural gas at the natural gas distribution utilities represented 83.2% of the total cost of natural gas for 2018.
Gas marketing services customers are charged for actual and estimated natural gas consumed. Cost of natural gas includes the cost of fuel and associated transportation costs, lost and unaccounted for gas, adjustments to reduce the value of inventories to market value, if applicable, and gains and losses associated with certain derivatives.
Cost of natural gas in 2018 was $1.5 billion, a decrease of $62 million, or 3.9%, compared to 2017, which was substantially all as a result of the Southern Company had no material change in market risk exposure for the year ended December 31, 2017 when compared to the year ended December 31, 2016.Gas Dispositions.
    Table of Contents                                Index to Financial Statements        

MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS (continued)
Southern Company and Subsidiary Companies 20172018 Annual Report


The changesCost of Other Sales
Cost of other sales in fair value2018 was $12 million, a decrease of energy-related derivative contracts are substantially attributable$17 million, or 58.6%, compared to both2017 primarily related to the volumedisposition of Pivotal Home Solutions.
Other Operations and Maintenance Expenses
Other operations and maintenance expenses increased $36 million, or 3.8%, in 2018 compared to the price of natural gas. For the years ended December 31, the changes in fair value of energy-related derivative contracts, the majority of which are composed of regulatory hedges, were as follows:
 2017 Changes 2016 Changes
 Fair Value
 (in millions)
Contracts outstanding at the beginning of the period, assets (liabilities), net$41
 $(213)
Acquisitions
 (54)
Contracts realized or settled(8) 141
Current period changes(a)
(196) 171
Contracts outstanding at the end of the period, assets (liabilities), net(b)
$(163) $45
(a)Current period changes also include the changes in fair value of new contracts entered into during the period, if any.
(b)Excludes premium and intrinsic value associated with weather derivatives of $11 million at December 31, 2017 and includes premium and intrinsic value associated with weather derivatives of $4 million at December 31, 2016.
The net hedge volumes of energy-related derivative contracts were 621prior year. Excluding a $39 million mmBtu and 500 million mmBtu for the years ended December 31, 2017 and 2016, respectively.
For the traditional electric operating companies and Southern Power, the weighted average swap contract cost above or (below) market prices was approximately $0.15 per mmBtu as of December 31, 2017 and $(0.05) per mmBtu as of December 31, 2016. The majority of the natural gas hedge gains and losses are recovered through the traditional electric operating companies' fuel cost recovery clauses.
At December 31, 2017 and 2016, substantially all ofdecrease related to the Southern Company system's energy-related derivative contracts were designated as regulatory hedgesGas Dispositions, other operations and were relatedmaintenance expenses increased $75 million. This increase was primarily due to a $53 million increase in compensation and benefit costs, including a $12 million one-time increase for the applicable company's fuel-hedging program. Therefore, gains and losses are initially recorded as regulatory liabilities and assets, respectively, and then are included in fuel expense as they are recovered through the energy cost recovery clause. Certain other gains and losses on energy-related derivatives, designated as cash flow hedges, are initially deferred in OCI before being recognized in income in the same period as the hedged transaction. Gains and losses on energy-related derivative contracts that are not designated or failadoption of a new paid time off policy to qualify as hedges are recognized in the statements of income as incurred and were not material for any year presented.
The Southern Company system uses exchange-traded market-observable contracts, which are categorized as Level 1 of the fair value hierarchy, and over-the-counter contracts that are not exchange traded but are fair valued using prices which are market observable, and thus fall into Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy. See Note 10 to the financial statements for further discussion of fair value measurements. The maturities of the energy-related derivative contracts at December 31, 2017 were as follows:
 Fair Value Measurements
 December 31, 2017
 
Total
Fair Value
 Maturity
  Year 1 Years 2&3 Years 4&5
 (in millions)
Level 1$(148) $(71) $(59) $(18)
Level 2(15) (30) 13
 2
Level 3
 
 
 
Fair value of contracts outstanding at end of period$(163) $(101) $(46) $(16)
The Southern Company system is exposed to market price risk in the event of nonperformance by counterparties to energy-related and interest rate derivative contracts. The Southern Company system only enters into agreements and material transactionsalign with counterparties that have investment grade credit ratings by Moody's and S&P, or with counterparties who have posted collateral to cover potential credit exposure. Therefore, the Southern Company system, does not anticipate market risk exposure from nonperformancea $28 million increase in disposition-related costs, and an $11 million expense for a litigation settlement to facilitate the sale of Pivotal Home Solutions. These increases were partially offset by a $27 million decrease in bad debt expense primarily at Nicor Gas, which was offset by a decrease in revenues as a result of the counterparties. For additional information, seerelated regulatory recovery mechanism. See Note 13 to the financial statements under "Financial InstrumentsGeneral Litigation Matters – Southern Company Gas" for additional information on the litigation settlement.
Depreciation and Amortization
Depreciation and amortization decreased $1 million, or 0.2%, in 2018 compared to the prior year. Excluding a $37 million decrease related to the Southern Company Gas Dispositions, depreciation and amortization increased $36 million. The increase was primarily due to continued infrastructure investments at the natural gas distribution utilities, partially offset by lower amortization of intangible assets as a result of fair value adjustments in acquisition accounting at gas marketing services. See Note 2 to the financial statements under "Southern Company Gas" for additional information on infrastructure replacement programs.
Taxes Other Than Income Taxes
Taxes other than income taxes increased $27 million, or 14.7%, in 2018 compared to the prior year. Excluding a $4 million decrease related to the Southern Company Gas Dispositions, taxes other than income taxes increased $31 million. This increase primarily reflects a $13 million increase in revenue tax expenses as a result of higher natural gas revenues, a $12 million increase in Nicor Gas' invested capital tax that reflects a $7 million credit in 2017 to establish a related regulatory asset, and a $4 million increase in property taxes. See Note 15 to the financial statements under "Southern Company Gas" for additional information on the Southern Company Gas Dispositions.
Impairment Charges
A goodwill impairment charge of $42 million was recorded in 2018 in contemplation of the sale of Pivotal Home Solutions. See Notes 1 and 15 to the financial statements under "Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets and Liabilities" and "Southern Company GasSale of Pivotal Home Solutions," respectively, for additional information.
Gain on Dispositions, Net
Gain on dispositions, net was $291 million in 2018 and was associated with the Southern Company Gas Dispositions. The income tax expense on these gains included income tax expense on goodwill not deductible for tax purposes and for which a deferred tax liability had not been recorded previously.
Earnings from Equity Method Investments
Earnings from equity method investments increased $42 million, or 39.6%, in 2018 compared to the prior year. The increase was primarily due to higher earnings from Southern Company Gas' equity method investment in SNG from new rates effective September 2018 and lower operations and maintenance expenses due to the timing of pipeline maintenance. See Note 117 to the financial statements.statements under "Southern Company GasEquity Method Investments" for additional information.
Interest Expense, Net of Amounts Capitalized
Interest expense, net of amounts capitalized increased $28 million, or 14.0%, in 2018 compared to the prior year. The increase was primarily due to $21 million of additional interest expense related to new debt issuances and a $4 million reduction in capitalized interest primarily due to the Dalton Pipeline being placed in service in August 2017.
Other Income (Expense), Net
Other income (expense), net decreased $43 million, or 97.7%, in 2018 compared to the prior year. Excluding a $3 million decrease related to the Southern Company Gas Dispositions, other income (expense), net decreased $40 million. This decrease
    Table of Contents                                Index to Financial Statements         ��  

MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS (continued)
Southern Company and Subsidiary Companies 20172018 Annual Report


Withwas primarily due to a $23 million increase in charitable donations and a $13 million decrease in gains from the exceptionsettlement of contractor litigation claims. See Note 2 to the financial statements under "Southern Company Gas' subsidiary, Atlanta Gas Light,Infrastructure Replacement Programs and Capital Projects– PRP" for additional information on the contractor litigation settlement.
Income Taxes
Income taxes increased $97 million, or 26.4%, in 2018 compared to the prior year. Excluding a $329 million increase related to the Southern Company Gas wholesale gas services business,Dispositions, including tax expense on the Southern Company system isgoodwill for which a deferred tax liability had not exposedbeen previously provided, income taxes decreased $232 million. This decrease was primarily due to concentrations of credit risk. Concentration of credit risk occurs at Atlanta Gas Light for amounts billed for services and other costs to its customers, which consist of 15 natural gas marketers in Georgia responsible for the retail sale of natural gas to end-use customers in Georgia. For 2017, the four largest natural gas marketers based on customer count accounted for 19% of Southern Company Gas' adjusted operating margin. Southern Company Gas' wholesale gas services business has a concentration of credit risk for services it provides to its counterparties as measured by its 30-day receivable exposure plus forward exposure. At December 31, 2017, Southern Company Gas' wholesale gas services business' top 20 counterparties represented approximately 48%, or $203 million, of its total counterparty exposure and had a weighted average S&P equivalent credit rating of A-, all of which is consistent with the prior year.
Southern Company performs periodic reviews of its leveraged lease transactions, both domestic and international,lower federal income tax rate and the creditworthinessflowback of excess deferred taxes as a result of the lessees, including a reviewTax Reform Legislation. In addition, 2017 included additional tax expense of $130 million from the valuerevaluation of the underlying leaseddeferred tax assets and the credit ratings of the lessees. Southern Company's domestic lease transactions generally do not have any credit enhancement mechanisms; however, the lessees in its international lease transactions have pledged various deposits as additional security to secure the obligations. The lessees in the Company's international lease transactions are also required to provide additional collateral in the event of a credit downgrade below a certain level.
Capital Requirements and Contractual Obligations
The Southern Company system's construction program is currently estimated to total approximately $9.4 billion for 2018, $9.3 billion for 2019, $8.4 billion for 2020, $7.0 billion for 2021, and $6.9 billion for 2022. These amounts include expenditures of approximately $1.2 billion, $1.0 billion, $0.9 billion, $0.7 billion, and $0.4 billion for the construction of Plant Vogtle Units 3 and 4 in 2018, 2019, 2020, 2021, and 2022, respectively, and an average of approximately $1.3 billion per year for 2018 through 2022 for Southern Power's planned expenditures for plant acquisitions and placeholder growth. These amounts also include capital expenditures related to contractual purchase commitments for nuclear fuel and capital expenditures covered under LTSAs. Estimated capital expenditures to comply with environmental laws and regulations included in these amounts are $1.1 billion, $0.3 billion, $0.4 billion, $0.5 billion, and $0.5 billion for 2018, 2019, 2020, 2021, and 2022, respectively. These estimated expenditures do not include any potential compliance costs associated with the regulationTax Reform Legislation, the enactment of CO2 emissions from fossil fuel-fired electric generating units.the State of Illinois income tax legislation, and new income tax apportionment factors in several states. See FUTURE EARNINGS POTENTIAL –Note 10 to the financial statements for additional information.
Other Business Activities
Southern Company's other business activities primarily include the parent company (which does not allocate operating expenses to business units); PowerSecure, which was acquired on May 9, 2016 and is a provider of energy solutions, including distributed infrastructure, energy efficiency products and services, and utility infrastructure services, to customers; Southern Company Holdings, Inc. (Southern Holdings), which invests in various projects, including leveraged lease projects; and Southern Linc, which provides digital wireless communications for use by Southern Company and its subsidiary companies and also markets these services to the public and provides fiber optics services within the Southeast.
A condensed statement of income for Southern Company's other business activities follows:
 Amount 
Increase (Decrease)
from Prior Year
 2018 2018 2017
 (in millions)
Operating revenues$1,015
 $444
 $268
Cost of other sales728
 313
 223
Other operations and maintenance273
 69
 9
Depreciation and amortization66
 14
 21
Taxes other than income taxes6
 3
 
Impairment charges12
 12
 
Total operating expenses1,085
 411
 253
Operating income (loss)(70) 33
 15
Interest expense579
 96
 178
Other income (expense), net(23) (23) 30
Income taxes (benefit)(222) 85
 (91)
Net income (loss)$(450) $(171) $(42)
In the table above, the 2018 changes for these other business activities reflect the inclusion of PowerSecure for the year ended December 31, 2018 compared to 2017. The 2017 changes reflect the inclusion of PowerSecure for the 12-month period in 2017 compared to the eight-month period following the acquisition on May 9, 2016, which is the primary variance driver. Additional detailed variance explanations are provided herein. See Note 15 to the financial statements under "Environmental MattersEnvironmental Laws and RegulationsSouthern Company Acquisition of PowerSecure" and " – Global Climate Issues" herein for additional information.
Operating Revenues
Southern Company's operating revenues for these other business activities increased $444 million, or 77.8%, in 2018 as compared to the prior year. The traditional electric operating companies also anticipate costsincrease was primarily related to PowerSecure's storm restoration services in Puerto Rico.
Cost of Other Sales
Cost of other sales for these other business activities increased $313 million, or 75.4% in 2018. The increase was primarily related to PowerSecure's storm restoration services in Puerto Rico.

MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS (continued)
Southern Company and Subsidiary Companies 2018 Annual Report


Other Operations and Maintenance Expenses
Other operations and maintenance expenses for these other business activities increased $69 million, or 33.8%, in 2018 as compared to the prior year. The increase was primarily due to PowerSecure's storm restoration services in Puerto Rico and parent company expenses related to the sale of Gulf Power. Other operations and maintenance expenses for these other business activities increased $9 million, or 4.6%, in 2017 as compared to the prior year. The increase was primarily due to a $44 million increase as a result of the inclusion of PowerSecure results for the 12-month period in 2017 compared to eight months in 2016, partially offset by a $35 million decrease in parent company expenses related to the Merger and the acquisition of PowerSecure.
Impairment Charges
Impairment charges for these other business activities were $12 million in 2018. These charges were associated with closureSouthern Linc's tower leases and monitoringwere recorded in contemplation of ash pondsthe sale of Gulf Power.
Interest Expense
Interest expense for these other business activities increased $96 million, or 19.9%, in accordance with2018 as compared to the CCR Rule, which are reflectedprior year primarily due to an increase in variable interest rates and average outstanding debt at the Company's ARO liabilities. These costs, which could changeparent company. Interest expense for these other business activities increased $178 million, or 58.4%, in 2017 as compared to the prior year primarily due to an increase in average outstanding long-term debt at the parent company. See Note 8 to the financial statements for additional information.
Other Income (Expense), Net
Other income (expense), net for these other business activities decreased $23 million in 2018 as compared to the prior year primarily due to charitable donations, partially offset by leveraged lease income at Southern Company system continues to refine its assumptions underlying the cost estimates and evaluate the method and timing of compliance activities, are estimated to be approximately $0.3 billion, $0.3 billion, $0.4 billion, $0.5 billion, and $0.4 billion for 2018, 2019, 2020, 2021, and 2022, respectively.Holdings. See Note 1 to the financial statements underfor additional information. Other income (expense), net for these other business activities increased $30 million in 2017 as compared to the prior year primarily due to expenses associated with bridge financing for the Merger in 2016.
Income Taxes (Benefit)
The income tax benefit for these other business activities decreased $85 million, or 27.7%, in 2018 as compared to the prior year primarily as a result of the Tax Reform Legislation, partially offset by an increase in pre-tax losses at the parent company. The income tax benefit for these other business activities increased $91 million, or 42.1%, in 2017 as compared to the prior year primarily as a result of pre-tax earnings (losses) and net tax benefits related to the Tax Reform Legislation. See FUTURE EARNINGS POTENTIAL – "Asset Retirement ObligationsIncome Tax MattersFederal Tax Reform Legislation" herein and Other Costs of Removal"Note 10 to the financial statements for additional information.
Effects of Inflation
The construction programselectric operating companies and natural gas distribution utilities are subject to periodic reviewrate regulation that is generally based on the recovery of historical and revision,projected costs. The effects of inflation can create an economic loss since the recovery of costs could be in dollars that have less purchasing power. Southern Power is party to long-term contracts reflecting market-based rates, including inflation expectations. Any adverse effect of inflation on Southern Company's results of operations has not been substantial in recent years.
FUTURE EARNINGS POTENTIAL
General
The traditional electric operating companies operate as vertically integrated utilities providing electric service to customers within their service territories in the Southeast. On January 1, 2019, Southern Company completed the sale of Gulf Power, one of the traditional electric operating companies, to NextEra Energy. The natural gas distribution utilities provide service to customers in their service territories in Illinois, Georgia, Virginia, and actual construction costs may vary from these estimates becauseTennessee. In July 2018, Southern Company Gas completed sales of numerous factors. These factors include: changes in business conditions; changes in load projections; changes in environmental lawsthree of its natural gas distribution utilities. Prices for electricity provided and regulations; the outcome of any legal challengesnatural gas distributed to the environmental rules; changes in electric generating plants, including unit retirements and replacements and addingretail customers are set by state PSCs or changing fuel sources at existing electric generating units, to meet regulatory requirements; changes in FERC rules and regulations;other applicable state regulatory agency approvals; changes in the expected environmental compliance program; changes in legislation; the costagencies under cost-based regulatory principles. Retail rates and efficiency of construction labor, equipment,earnings are reviewed and materials; project scopemay be adjusted periodically within certain limitations. Prices for wholesale electricity sales and design changes; storm impacts;natural gas distribution, interconnecting transmission lines, and the costexchange of capital.electric power are regulated by the FERC. Southern Power continues to focus on long-term PPAs. In addition, there can be no assurance that costs related2018, Southern Power completed sales of noncontrolling interests in entities indirectly owning substantially all of its solar facilities and eight of its wind facilities and also completed sales and entered into an agreement to capital expenditures will be fully recovered. Additionally, planned expenditures for plant acquisitions may vary due to market opportunities and Southern Power's ability to executesell certain of its growth strategy.natural gas plants. See Note 12 to the financial statements underACCOUNTING POLICIES "Southern Power" for additional information regarding Southern Power's plant acquisitions.
In addition, the construction program includes the development and constructionApplication of new electric generating facilities with designs that have not been previously constructed, which may result in revised estimates during construction. The ability to control costs and avoid cost overruns during the development, construction, and operation of new facilities is subject to a number of factors, including, but not limited to, changes in labor costs and productivity, adverse weather conditions, shortages and inconsistent quality of equipment, materials, and labor, contractor or supplier delay, non-performance under construction, operating, or other agreements, operational readiness, including specialized operator training and required site safety programs, unforeseen engineering or design problems, start-up activities (including major equipment failure and system integration), and/or operational performance. See Note 3 to the financial statements under "Nuclear Construction" for information regarding additional factors that may impact construction expenditures.Critical Accounting Policies
    Table of Contents                                Index to Financial Statements        

MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS (continued)
Southern Company and Subsidiary Companies 20172018 Annual Report


As a result of NRC requirements, Alabama Power and Georgia Power have external trust funds for nuclear decommissioning costs; however, Alabama Power currently has no additional funding requirements. For additional information, see Note 1 to the financial statements under "EstimatesNuclear Decommissioning.Utility Regulation"
In addition, as discussed in herein and Note 2 to the financial statements for additional information about regulatory matters.
The results of operations for the past three years are not necessarily indicative of Southern Company's future earnings potential. Future earnings will be impacted by the 2018 disposition activities described herein and in Note 15 to the financial statements. The level of Southern Company's future earnings depends on numerous factors that affect the opportunities, challenges, and risks of the Southern Company system's primary businesses of selling electricity and distributing natural gas. These factors include the traditional electric operating companies' and the natural gas distribution utilities' ability to maintain constructive regulatory environments that allow for the timely recovery of prudently-incurred costs during a time of increasing costs, continued customer growth, and, for the traditional electric operating companies, the weak pace of growth in electricity use per customer, especially in residential and commercial markets. Plant Vogtle Units 3 and 4 construction and rate recovery and the profitability of Southern Power's competitive wholesale business are also major factors.
Earnings in the electricity business will also depend upon maintaining and growing sales, considering, among other things, the adoption and/or penetration rates of increasingly energy-efficient technologies, increasing volumes of electronic commerce transactions, and more multi-family home construction, all of which could contribute to a net reduction in customer usage. Earnings for both the electricity and natural gas businesses are subject to a variety of other factors. These factors include weather, competition, new energy contracts with other utilities and other wholesale customers, energy conservation practiced by customers, the use of alternative energy sources by customers, the prices of electricity and natural gas, the price elasticity of demand, and the rate of economic growth or decline in the service territory. In addition, the level of future earnings for the wholesale electric business also depends on numerous factors including regulatory matters, creditworthiness of customers, total electric generating capacity available and related costs, the development or acquisition of renewable facilities and other energy projects, and the successful remarketing of capacity as current contracts expire. Demand for electricity and natural gas is primarily driven by the pace of economic growth that may be affected by changes in regional and global economic conditions, which may impact future earnings. In addition, the volatility of natural gas prices has a significant impact on the natural gas distribution utilities' customer rates, long-term competitive position against other energy sources, and the ability of Southern Company Gas' gas marketing services and wholesale gas services businesses to capture value from locational and seasonal spreads. Additionally, changes in commodity prices subject a significant portion of Southern Company Gas' operations to earnings variability.
As part of its ongoing effort to adapt to changing market conditions, Southern Company continues to evaluate and consider a wide array of potential business strategies. These strategies may include business combinations, partnerships, and acquisitions involving other utility or non-utility businesses or properties, disposition of certain assets or businesses, internal restructuring, or some combination thereof. Furthermore, Southern Company may engage in new business ventures that arise from competitive and regulatory changes in the utility industry. Pursuit of any of the above strategies, or any combination thereof, may significantly affect the business operations, risks, and financial condition of Southern Company.
On January 1, 2019, Southern Company completed the sale of Gulf Power to NextEra Energy for an aggregate cash purchase price of approximately $5.8 billion (less $1.3 billion of indebtedness assumed), subject to customary working capital adjustments. In 2018, net income attributable to Gulf Power was $160 million.
On June 4, 2018, Southern Company Gas completed the stock sale of Pivotal Home Solutions to American Water Enterprises LLC for a total cash purchase price of $365 million. On July 1, 2018, a Southern Company Gas subsidiary, Pivotal Utility Holdings, completed the sales of the assets of two of its natural gas distribution utilities, Elizabethtown Gas and Elkton Gas, to South Jersey Industries, Inc. for a total cash purchase price of $1.7 billion. On July 29, 2018, Southern Company Gas and its wholly-owned direct subsidiary, NUI Corporation, completed the stock sale of Pivotal Utility Holdings, which primarily consisted of Florida City Gas, to NextEra Energy for a total cash purchase price of $587 million. The total cash purchase price for each transaction includes final working capital and other adjustments.
The Southern Company Gas Dispositions resulted in a net loss of $51 million, which includes $342 million of tax expense. The after-tax impacts of these dispositions included income tax expense on goodwill not deductible for tax purposes and for which a deferred tax liability had not been recorded previously. In addition, a goodwill impairment charge of $42 million was recorded during 2018 in contemplation of the sale of Pivotal Home Solutions.
On May 22, 2018, Southern Power sold a noncontrolling 33% equity interest in SP Solar, a limited partnership indirectly owning substantially all of Southern Power's solar facilities, for approximately $1.2 billion and, on December 11, 2018, sold a noncontrolling tax equity interest in SP Wind, a holding company owning a portfolio of eight operating wind facilities, for approximately $1.2 billion. Additionally, on November 5, 2018, Southern Power entered into an agreement to sell all of its equity interests in Plant Mankato (including the 385-MW expansion currently under construction) for an aggregate purchase price of approximately $650 million. The completion of the disposition is subject to the expansion unit reaching commercial operation as well as various other customary conditions to closing, including FERC and state commission approvals, and the sale is expected

MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS (continued)
Southern Company and Subsidiary Companies 2018 Annual Report


to close mid-2019. The ultimate outcome of this matter cannot be determined at this time. On December 4, 2018, Southern Power sold of all of its equity interests in the Florida Plants to NextEra Energy for approximately $203 million.
See Note 15 to the financial statements for additional information regarding disposition activities.
Environmental Matters
The Southern Company system's operations are regulated by state and federal environmental agencies through a variety of laws and regulations governing air, water, land, and protection of other natural resources. The Southern Company system maintains comprehensive environmental compliance and GHG strategies to assess upcoming requirements and compliance costs associated with these environmental laws and regulations. The costs, including capital expenditures, operations and maintenance costs, and costs reflected in ARO liabilities, required to comply with environmental laws and regulations and to achieve stated goals may impact future electric generating unit retirement and replacement decisions, results of operations, cash flows, and/or financial condition. Related costs may result from the installation of additional environmental controls, closure and monitoring of CCR facilities, unit retirements, or changing fuel sources for certain existing units, as well as related upgrades to the Southern Company system's transmission and distribution (electric and natural gas) systems. A major portion of these costs is expected to be recovered through retail and wholesale rates. The ultimate impact of environmental laws and regulations and the GHG goals discussed herein will depend on various factors, such as state adoption and implementation of requirements, the availability and cost of any deployed technology, fuel prices, and the outcome of pending and/or future legal challenges.
New or revised environmental laws and regulations could affect many areas of the traditional electric operating companies', Southern Power's, and the natural gas distribution utilities' operations. The impact of any such changes cannot be determined at this time. Environmental compliance costs could affect earnings if such costs cannot continue to be recovered in rates on a timely basis for the traditional electric operating companies and the natural gas distribution utilities or through long-term wholesale agreements for the traditional electric operating companies and Southern Power. Further, increased costs that are recovered through regulated rates could contribute to reduced demand for electricity and natural gas, which could negatively affect results of operations, cash flows, and/or financial condition. Additionally, many commercial and industrial customers may also be affected by existing and future environmental requirements, which for some may have the potential to ultimately affect their demand for electricity and natural gas.
The Southern Company system's commitment to the environment has been demonstrated in many ways, including participating in partnerships resulting in approximately $140 million of funding that has restored or enhanced more than 2 million acres of habitat since 2003; the removal of more than 15.5 million pounds of trash and debris from waterways between 2000 and 2018 through the Renew Our Rivers program; a 21.2% reduction in surface water withdrawal from 2015 to 2017; reductions in SO2 and NOX air emissions of 98% and 89%, respectively, from 1990 to 2017; the reduction of mercury air emissions of over 95% from 2005 to 2017; and the Southern Company system's changing energy mix.
Through 2018, the traditional electric operating companies have invested approximately $14.2 billion in environmental capital retrofit projects to comply with environmental requirements, with annual totals of approximately $1.3 billion, $0.9 billion, and $0.5 billion for 2018, 2017, and 2016, respectively. Although the timing, requirements, and estimated costs could change as environmental laws and regulations are adopted or modified, as compliance plans are revised or updated, and as legal challenges to rules are initiated or completed, the Southern Company system's current compliance strategy estimates capital expenditures of $1.4 billion from 2019 through 2023, with annual totals of approximately $0.5 billion, $0.2 billion, $0.3 billion, $0.3 billion, and $0.2 billion for 2019, 2020, 2021, 2022, and 2023, respectively. These estimates do not include any potential compliance costs associated with pending regulation of CO2 emissions from fossil fuel-fired electric generating units. See "Global Climate Issues" herein for additional information. The Southern Company system also anticipates substantial expenditures associated with ash pond closure and ground water monitoring under the CCR Rule, which are reflected in Southern Company's ARO liabilities. See FINANCIAL CONDITION AND LIQUIDITY – "Capital Requirements and Contractual Obligations" herein and Note 6 to the financial statements for additional information.
Environmental Laws and Regulations
Air Quality
The EPA has set National Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS) for six air pollutants (carbon monoxide, lead, nitrogen dioxide, ozone, particulate matter, and SO2) to protect and improve the nation's air quality, which it reviews and revises periodically. Following a NAAQS revision, states are required to develop an EPA-approved plan to protect air quality. These state plans can require additional emission controls, improvements in control efficiency, or fuel changes which can result in increased compliance and operational costs. NAAQS requirements can also adversely affect the siting of new electric generating facilities. All areas within the Southern Company system's electric service territory have been designated as attainment for all NAAQS

MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS (continued)
Southern Company and Subsidiary Companies 2018 Annual Report


except for a seven-county area within metropolitan Atlanta that is not in attainment with the 2015 ozone NAAQS and the area surrounding Plant Hammond, in Georgia, which will not be designated attainment or nonattainment for the 2010 SO2 standard until December 2020. If areas are designated as nonattainment in the future, increased compliance costs could result. See "Regulatory Matters – Georgia Power – Integrated Resource Plan" herein for information regarding Georgia Power's request to decertify and retire Plant Hammond.
In 2011, the EPA finalized the Cross-State Air Pollution Rule (CSAPR) to address impacts of SO2 and NOX emissions from fossil fuel-fired electric generating plants. CSAPR establishes emissions trading programs and budgets for certain states and allocates emissions allowances for sources in those states. In 2016, the EPA published a final rule establishing more stringent ozone season NOX emissions budgets in Alabama, Mississippi, and Texas. Georgia's ozone season NOX emissions budget remained unchanged. The EPA also removed North Carolina from this particular CSAPR program. The outcome of ongoing CSAPR litigation concerning the 2016 CSAPR rule, to which Mississippi Power is a party, could have an impact on the State of Mississippi's ozone season NOX emissions budget. Increases in either future fossil fuel-fired generation or the availability or cost of CSAPR allowances could have a negative financial impact on results of operations for Southern Company.
The EPA finalized regional haze regulations in 2005 and 2017. These regulations require states, tribal governments, and various federal agencies to develop and implement plans to reduce pollutants that impair visibility and demonstrate reasonable progress toward the goal of restoring natural visibility conditions in certain areas, including national parks and wilderness areas. States must submit a revised state implementation plan (SIP) to the EPA demonstrating continued reasonable progress towards achieving visibility improvement goals. These plans could require reductions in certain pollutants, such as particulate matter, SO2, and NOX, which could result in increased compliance costs. The EPA approved the regional progress SIPs for the States of Alabama and Georgia, but only issued a limited approval of the regional progress SIP for the State of Mississippi because Mississippi must revise the best available retrofit technology (BART) provisions of its SIP. Therefore, Mississippi Power's Plant Daniel is the only electric generating unit in the Southern Company system provides postretirement benefitsthat continues to be evaluated under the regional haze BART provisions. Mississippi Power is required to submit Plant Daniel's BART analysis to the majorityState of Mississippi by summer 2019. Requirements for further reduction of these pollutants at Plant Daniel could increase compliance costs.
Water Quality
In 2014, the EPA finalized requirements under Section 316(b) of the Clean Water Act (CWA) to regulate cooling water intake structures (CWIS) to minimize their effects on fish and other aquatic life at existing power plants (e.g. coal, natural gas, oil, and nuclear generating plants) and manufacturing facilities. The regulation requires plant-specific studies to determine applicable CWIS changes to protect organisms that either get caught on the intake screens (impingement) or are drawn into the cooling system (entrainment). The Southern Company system is conducting these studies and currently anticipates applicable CWIS changes may include fish-friendly CWIS screens with fish return systems and minor additions of monitoring equipment at certain plants. However, the ultimate impact of this rule will depend on the outcome of these plant-specific studies, any additional protective measures required to be incorporated into each plant's National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit based on site-specific factors, and the outcome of any legal challenges.
In 2015, the EPA finalized the steam electric effluent limitations guidelines (ELG) rule (2015 ELG Rule) that set national standards for wastewater discharges from new and existing steam electric generating units generating greater than 50 MWs. The 2015 ELG Rule prohibits effluent discharges of certain waste streams and imposes stringent limits on flue gas desulfurization (scrubber) wastewater discharges. The revised technology-based limits and the CCR Rule require extensive changes to existing ash and wastewater management systems or the installation and operation of new ash and wastewater management systems. Compliance with the 2015 ELG Rule is expected to require capital expenditures and increased operational costs primarily for the traditional electric operating companies' coal-fired electric generation. State environmental agencies will incorporate specific compliance applicability dates in the NPDES permitting process for each ELG waste stream no later than December 31, 2023. The EPA is scheduled to issue a new rulemaking by December 2019 that could revise the limitations and applicability dates of two of the waste streams regulated in the 2015 ELG Rule. The impact of any changes to the 2015 ELG Rule will depend on the content of the new rule and the outcome of any legal challenges.
In 2015, the EPA and the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (Corps) jointly published a final rule that revised the regulatory definition of waters of the United States (WOTUS) for all CWA programs. The rule significantly expanded the scope of federal jurisdiction over waterbodies (such as rivers, streams, canals, and wastewater treatment ponds), which could impact new generation projects and permitting and reporting requirements associated with the installation, expansion, and maintenance of transmission, distribution, and pipeline projects. The EPA and the Corps are expected to publish a final rule in 2019 to replace the 2015 WOTUS definition. The impact of any changes to the 2015 WOTUS rule will depend on the content of this final rule and the outcome of any legal challenges.

MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS (continued)
Southern Company and Subsidiary Companies 2018 Annual Report


Coal Combustion Residuals
In 2015, the EPA finalized non-hazardous solid waste regulations for the disposal of CCR, including coal ash and gypsum, in landfills and surface impoundments (ash ponds) at active generating power plants. In addition to the EPA's CCR Rule, the States of Alabama and Georgia have also finalized regulations regarding the handling of CCR within their respective states. The EPA's CCR Rule requires landfills and ash ponds to be evaluated against a set of performance criteria and potentially closed if minimum criteria are not met. Closure of existing landfills and ash ponds could require installation of equipment and infrastructure to manage CCR in accordance with the CCR Rule. Based on cost estimates for closure and monitoring of landfills and ash ponds pursuant to the CCR Rule, the Southern Company system recorded AROs for each CCR unit in 2015. As further analysis was performed and closure details were developed, the traditional electric operating companies have continued to periodically update these cost estimates, as discussed further below.
The EPA published certain amendments to the CCR Rule, which became effective August 29, 2018. These amendments extend the date from April 2019 to October 31, 2020 to cease sending CCR and other waste streams to ash ponds that demonstrate compliance with all except two of the specified performance criteria.
On August 21, 2018, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit issued a decision suggesting the EPA should regulate previously-excluded inactive ash ponds located at retired generation facilities and questioning both the ability of unlined ash ponds to continue operating no matter the performance criteria results and the classification of clay-lined landfills and ash ponds. These developments could impact the expected timing of the traditional electric operating companies' landfill and ash pond closure activities, but the extent of any impact will depend on the outcome of ongoing litigation, anticipated EPA rulemaking action to establish further guidance, and the outcome of any legal challenges.
In June 2018, Alabama Power recorded an increase of approximately $1.2 billion to its AROs related to the CCR Rule. The revised cost estimates were based on information from feasibility studies performed on ash ponds in use at plants operated by Alabama Power, including at a plant jointly-owned by Mississippi Power. During the second quarter 2018, Alabama Power's management completed its analysis of these studies which indicated that additional closure costs, primarily related to increases in estimated ash volume, water management requirements, and design revisions, will be required to close these ash ponds under the planned closure-in-place methodology. As the level of work becomes more defined in the next 12 months, it is likely that these cost estimates will change and the change could be material.
In December 2018, Georgia Power recorded an increase of approximately $3.1 billion to its AROs related to the CCR Rule and the related state rule. During the second half of 2018, Georgia Power completed a strategic assessment related to its plans to close the ash ponds at all of its employeesgenerating plants in compliance with the CCR Rule and funds truststhe related state rule. This assessment included engineering and constructability studies related to design assumptions for ash pond closures and advanced engineering methods. The results indicated that additional closure costs will be required to close these ash ponds, primarily due to changes in closure strategies, the estimated amount of ash to be excavated, and additional water management requirements necessary to support closure strategies. These factors also impact the estimated timing of future cash outlays.
The traditional electric operating companies expect to periodically update their ARO cost estimates. Absent continued recovery of ARO costs through regulated rates, Southern Company's results of operations, cash flows, and financial condition could be materially impacted. See FINANCIAL CONDITION AND LIQUIDITY – "Capital Requirements and Contractual Obligations" herein and Note 6 to the extent required by PSCs, other applicable state regulatory agencies, orfinancial statements for additional information.
The ultimate outcome of these matters cannot be determined at this time.
Nuclear Decommissioning
In June 2018, Alabama Power completed an updated decommissioning cost site study for Plant Farley. The estimated cost of decommissioning based on the FERC.study resulted in an increase in Alabama Power's ARO liability of approximately $300 million. Amounts previously contributed to Alabama Power's external trust funds are currently projected to be adequate to meet the updated decommissioning obligations.
Other funding requirements relatedIn December 2018, Georgia Power completed updated decommissioning cost site studies for Plant Hatch and Plant Vogtle Units 1 and 2. The estimated cost of decommissioning based on the studies resulted in an increase in Georgia Power's ARO liability of approximately $130 million. Georgia Power currently collects $4 million and $2 million annually in rates, which is used to obligations associated with scheduled maturities of long-term debt, as well asfund external nuclear decommissioning trusts for Plant Hatch and Plant Vogtle Units 1 and 2, respectively. Georgia Power expects the related interest, derivative obligations, preferred stock dividends, leases, unrecognized tax benefits, pipeline charges, storage capacity, gas supply, asset management agreements, other purchase commitments,Georgia PSC to review and trusts are detailedadjust, if necessary, these amounts in the contractual obligations table that follows. Georgia Power 2019 Base Rate Case.
See Notes 1, 2, 5,Note 6 7, and 11 to the financial statements for additional information.
    Table of Contents                                Index to Financial Statements        

MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS (continued)
Southern Company and Subsidiary Companies 20172018 Annual Report


Contractual ObligationsEnvironmental Remediation
The Southern Company system's contractual obligations at December 31, 2017 were as follows:
 2018 2019- 2020 2021- 2022 After 2022 Total
 (in millions)
Long-term debt(a) —
         
Principal$3,865
 $6,293
 $5,206
 $32,610
 $47,974
Interest1,782
 3,286
 2,793
 27,535
 35,396
Preferred stock dividends of subsidiaries(b)
16
 33
 33
 
 82
Financial derivative obligations(c)
493
 198
 37
 5
 733
Operating leases(d)
149
 232
 178
 968
 1,527
Capital leases(d)
39
 43
 20
 232
 334
Unrecognized tax benefits(e)
18
 
 
 
 18
Pipeline charges, storage capacity, and gas supply(f)
813
 968
 714
 2,294
 4,789
Asset management agreements(g)
9
 6
 
 
 15
Purchase commitments 
        

Capital(h)
9,016
 16,905
 12,749
 
 38,670
Fuel(i)
3,156
 3,573
 1,927
 5,588
 14,244
Purchased power(j)
424
 884
 886
 3,716
 5,910
Other(k)
407
 713
 434
 2,745
 4,299
Trusts —        

Nuclear decommissioning(l)
5
 11
 11
 94
 121
Pension and other postretirement benefit plans(m)
137
 275
 
 
 412
Total$20,329
 $33,420
 $24,988
 $75,787
 $154,524
(a)
All amounts are reflected based on final maturity dates except for amounts related to FFB borrowings and certain revenue bonds. As it relates to the FFB borrowings, the final maturity date is February 20, 2044; however, principal amortization is reflected beginning in 2020. See Note 6 to the financial statements under "DOE Loan Guarantee Borrowings" and "Securities Due Within One Year" for additional information. Southern Company and its subsidiaries plan to continue, when economically feasible, to retire higher-cost securities and replace these obligationssystem must comply with lower-cost capital if market conditions permit. Variable rate interest obligations are estimated based on rates as of December 31, 2017, as reflected in the statements of capitalization. Fixed rates include, where applicable, the effects of interest rate derivatives employed to manage interest rate risk. Long-term debt excludes capital lease amounts (shown separately).
(b)Represents preferred stock of subsidiaries. Preferred stock does not mature; therefore, amounts are provided for the next five years only.
(c)See Notes 1 and 11 to the financial statements.
(d)Excludes PPAs that are accounted for as leases and included in "Purchased power."
(e)
See Note 5 to the financial statements under "Unrecognized Tax Benefits" for additional information.
(f)Includes charges recoverable through a natural gas cost recovery mechanism, or alternatively billed to marketers selling retail natural gas, and demand charges associated with Southern Company Gas' wholesale gas services. The gas supply balance includes amounts for gas commodity purchase commitments associated with Southern Company Gas' gas marketing services of 35 million mmBtu at floating gas prices calculated using forward natural gas prices at December 31, 2017 and valued at $101 million. Southern Company Gas provides guarantees to certain gas suppliers for certain of its subsidiaries in support of payment obligations.
(g)Represents fixed-fee minimum payments for asset management agreements associated with wholesale gas services.
(h)
The Southern Company system provides estimated capital expenditures for a five-year period, including capital expenditures associated with environmental regulations. These amounts exclude contractual purchase commitments for nuclear fuel and capital expenditures covered under LTSAs which are reflected in "Fuel" and "Other," respectively. At December 31, 2017, significant purchase commitments were outstanding in connection with the construction program. See FUTURE EARNINGS POTENTIAL – "Environmental MattersEnvironmental Laws and Regulations" herein for additional information.
(i)Primarily includes commitments to purchase coal, nuclear fuel, and natural gas, as well as the related transportation and storage. In most cases, these contracts contain provisions for price escalation, minimum purchase levels, and other financial commitments. Natural gas purchase commitments are based on various indices at the time of delivery. Amounts reflected for natural gas purchase commitments have been estimated based on the New York Mercantile Exchange future prices at December 31, 2017.
(j)Estimated minimum long-term obligations for various PPA purchases from gas-fired, biomass, and wind-powered facilities.
(k)Includes LTSAs, contracts for the procurement of limestone, contractual environmental remediation liabilities, and operation and maintenance agreements. LTSAs include price escalation based on inflation indices.

MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS (continued)
Southern Company and Subsidiary Companies 2017 Annual Report


(l)
Projections of nuclear decommissioning trust fund contributions for Plant Hatch and Plant Vogtle Units 1 and 2 are based on the 2013 ARP for Georgia Power. Alabama Power also has external trust funds for nuclear decommissioning costs; however, Alabama Power currently has no additional funding requirements. See Note 1 to the financial statements under "Nuclear Decommissioning" for additional information.
(m)The Southern Company system forecasts contributions to the pension and other postretirement benefit plans over a three-year period. Southern Company anticipates no mandatory contributions to the qualified pension plans during the next three years. Amounts presented represent estimated benefit payments for the nonqualified pension plans, estimated non-trust benefit payments for the other postretirement benefit plans, and estimated contributions to the other postretirement benefit plan trusts, all of which will be made from corporate assets of Southern Company's subsidiaries. See Note 2 to the financial statements for additional information related to the pension and other postretirement benefit plans, including estimated benefit payments. Certain benefit payments will be made through the related benefit plans. Other benefit payments will be made from corporate assets of Southern Company's subsidiaries.

MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS (continued)
Southern Company and Subsidiary Companies 2017 Annual Report


Cautionary Statement Regarding Forward-Looking Statements
Southern Company's 2017 Annual Report contains forward-looking statements. Forward-looking statements include, among other things, statements concerning regulated rates, the strategic goals for the wholesale business, customer and sales growth, economic conditions, fuel and environmental cost recovery and other rate actions, current and proposed environmental regulations and related compliance plans and estimated expenditures, pending or potential litigation matters, access to sources of capital, projections for the qualified pension plans, postretirement benefit plans, and nuclear decommissioning trust fund contributions, financing activities, completion dates of construction projects, completion of announced acquisitions or dispositions, filings with state and federal regulatory authorities, impacts of the Tax Reform Legislation, federal and state income tax benefits, estimated sales and purchases under power sale and purchase agreements, and estimated construction and other plans and expenditures. In some cases, forward-looking statements can be identified by terminology such as "may," "will," "could," "should," "expects," "plans," "anticipates," "believes," "estimates," "projects," "predicts," "potential," or "continue" or the negative of these terms or other similar terminology. There are various factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from those suggested by the forward-looking statements; accordingly, there can be no assurance that such indicated results will be realized. These factors include:
the impact of recent and future federal and state regulatory changes, including environmental laws and regulations governing air, water, land,the handling and protectiondisposal of other natural resources,waste and also changes in tax and otherreleases of hazardous substances. Under these various laws and regulations, to which Southern Company and its subsidiaries are subject, as well as changes in application of existing laws and regulations;
the uncertainty surrounding the recently enacted Tax Reform Legislation, including implementing regulations and IRS interpretations, actions that may be taken in response by regulatory authorities, and its impact, if any, on the credit ratings of Southern Company and its subsidiaries;
current and future litigation or regulatory investigations, proceedings, or inquiries;
the effects, extent, and timing of the entry of additional competition in the markets in which Southern Company's subsidiaries operate;
variations in demand for electricity and natural gas, including those relating to weather, the general economy, population and business growth (and declines), the effects of energy conservation and efficiency measures, including from the development and deployment of alternative energy sources such as self-generation and distributed generation technologies, and any potential economic impacts resulting from federal fiscal decisions;
available sources and costs of natural gas and other fuels;
limits on pipeline capacity;
transmission constraints;
effects of inflation;
the ability to control costs and avoid cost overruns during the development, construction, and operation of facilities, which include the development and construction of generating facilities with designs that have not been previously constructed, including changes in labor costs and productivity, adverse weather conditions, shortages and inconsistent quality of equipment, materials, and labor, contractor or supplier delay, non-performance under construction, operating, or other agreements, operational readiness, including specialized operator training and required site safety programs, unforeseen engineering or design problems, start-up activities (including major equipment failure and system integration), and/or operational performance;
the ability to construct facilities in accordance with the requirements of permits and licenses (including satisfaction of NRC requirements), to satisfy any environmental performance standards and the requirements of tax credits and other incentives, and to integrate facilities into the Southern Company system upon completioncould incur substantial costs to clean up affected sites. The traditional electric operating companies and the natural gas distribution utilities conduct studies to determine the extent of construction;any required cleanup and Southern Company has recognized the estimated costs to clean up known impacted sites in its financial statements. Amounts for cleanup and ongoing monitoring costs were not material for any year presented. The traditional electric operating companies and the natural gas distribution utilities in Illinois and Georgia have all received authority from their respective state PSCs or other applicable state regulatory agencies to recover approved environmental compliance costs through regulatory mechanisms. These regulatory mechanisms are adjusted annually or as necessary within limits approved by the state PSCs or other applicable state regulatory agencies. The traditional electric operating companies and Southern Company Gas may be liable for some or all required cleanup costs for additional sites that may require environmental remediation. See Note 3 to the financial statements under "Environmental Remediation" for additional information.
investmentGlobal Climate Issues
On August 31, 2018, the EPA published a proposed rule known as the Affordable Clean Energy (ACE) Rule, which is intended to replace a regulation enacted in 2015 known as the Clean Power Plan (CPP), that would limit CO2 emissions from existing fossil fuel-fired electric generating units. The CPP has been stayed by the U.S. Supreme Court since 2016. The ACE Rule would require states to develop GHG unit-specific emission rate standards based on heat-rate efficiency improvements for existing fossil fuel-fired steam units. As proposed, combustion turbines, including natural gas combined cycles, are not affected sources. As of January 1, 2019, the Southern Company system has ownership interests in 40 fossil fuel-fired steam units to which the proposed ACE Rule is applicable. The ultimate impact of this rule to the Southern Company system is currently unknown and will depend on changes between the proposal and the final rule, subsequent state plan developments and requirements, and any associated legal challenges.
On December 20, 2018, the EPA published a proposed review of the Standards of Performance for Greenhouse Gas Emissions from New, Modified, and Reconstructed Stationary Sources: Electric Utility Generating Units final rule (2015 NSPS rule). The EPA's final 2015 NSPS rule set standards of performance for new, modified, and reconstructed electric utility generating units which included stationary combustion turbines and fossil-fired steam boilers. This proposal reduces the stringency of the 2015 NSPS rule by not basing the new and reconstructed fossil-fired steam boiler and IGCC standards on partial carbon capture and sequestration. The impact of any changes to this rule will depend on the content of the final rule and the outcome of any legal challenges.
Additional domestic GHG policies may emerge in the future requiring the United States to transition to a lower GHG emitting economy. The Southern Company system has transitioned from an electric generating mix of 70% coal and 15% natural gas in 2007 to a mix of 30% coal and 46% natural gas in 2018, along with over 8,000 MWs of renewable resources. This transition has been supported in part by the Southern Company system retiring 4,226 MWs of coal- and oil-fired generating capacity since 2010 and converting 3,280 MWs of generating capacity from coal to natural gas since 2015. In addition, Southern Company Gas has replaced approximately 5,600 miles of bare steel and cast-iron pipe, resulting in removal of approximately 2.5 million metric tons of GHG from its natural gas distribution system since 1998. Based on ownership or financial control of facilities, the Southern Company system's employee2017 GHG emissions (CO2 equivalent) were approximately 98 million metric tons, with 2018 emissions estimated at 98 million metric tons. This equates to a reduction of 36% between 2007 and retiree benefit plans2018. The 2018 estimates include GHG emissions attributable to each of Elizabethtown Gas, Elkton Gas, Florida City Gas, and nuclear decommissioning trust funds;the Florida Plants through the date of the applicable disposition. See Note 15 to the financial statements for additional information regarding disposition activities.
advancesIn April 2018, Southern Company established an intermediate goal of a 50% reduction in technology;
ongoingcarbon emissions from 2007 levels by 2030 and a long-term goal of low- to no-carbon operations by 2050. To achieve these goals, the Southern Company system expects to continue growing its renewable energy partnerships and development agreements;
state and federal rate regulations and the impact of pending and future rate cases and negotiations, including rate actions relatingportfolio, optimize technology advancements to fuel and other cost recovery mechanisms;
the ability to successfully operate the electric utilities' generating,modernize its transmission and distribution facilitiessystems, increase the use of natural gas for generation, complete ongoing construction projects, including Georgia Power's interest in Plant Vogtle Units 3 and 4, invest in energy efficiency, and continue research and development efforts focused on technologies to lower GHG emissions. The Southern Company Gas'system's ability to achieve these goals also will be dependent on many external factors, including supportive national energy policies, low natural gas distribution and storage facilitiesprices, and the successful performancedevelopment, deployment, and advancement of necessary corporate functions;relevant energy technologies.
    Table of Contents                                Index to Financial Statements        

MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS (continued)
Southern Company and Subsidiary Companies 20172018 Annual Report


legal proceedingsFERC Matters
Open Access Transmission Tariff
On May 10, 2018, AMEA and regulatory approvalsCooperative Energy filed with the FERC a complaint against SCS and actions relatedthe traditional electric operating companies claiming that the current 11.25% base ROE used in calculating the annual transmission revenue requirements of the traditional electric operating companies' open access transmission tariff is unjust and unreasonable as measured by the applicable FERC standards. The complaint requested that the base ROE be set no higher than 8.65% and that the FERC order refunds for the difference in revenue requirements that results from applying a just and reasonable ROE established in this proceeding upon determining the current ROE is unjust and unreasonable. On June 18, 2018, SCS and the traditional electric operating companies filed their response challenging the adequacy of the showing presented by the complainants and offering support for the current ROE. On September 6, 2018, the FERC issued an order establishing a refund effective date of May 10, 2018 in the event a refund is due and initiating an investigation and settlement procedures regarding the current base ROE. Through December 31, 2018, the estimated maximum potential refund is not expected to Plant Vogtle Units 3 and 4, including Georgia PSC approvals and NRC actions;be material to Southern Company's results of operations or cash flows. The ultimate outcome of this matter cannot be determined at this time.
litigation related to the Kemper County energy facility;Southern Company Gas
the inherent risksSouthern Company Gas' gas pipeline investments business is involved in operating and constructing nuclear generating facilities, including environmental, health, regulatory, natural disaster, terrorism, and financial risks;
two significant pipeline construction projects, the inherent risks involved in transporting and storing natural gas;
the performance of projects undertaken by the non-utility businessesAtlantic Coast Pipeline (5% ownership) and the successPennEast Pipeline (20% ownership), which received FERC approval in October 2017 and January 2018, respectively. Southern Company Gas' total capital expenditures, excluding AFUDC, at completion are expected to be between $350 million and $390 million for the Atlantic Coast Pipeline and $276 million for the PennEast Pipeline. These projects, along with Southern Company Gas' existing pipelines, are intended to provide diverse sources of effortsnatural gas supplies to investcustomers, resolve current and long-term supply planning for new capacity, enhance system reliability, and generate economic development in the areas served.
Work continues with state and develop new opportunities;federal agencies to obtain the required permits to begin construction on the PennEast Pipeline. Any material delays may impact forecasted capital expenditures and the expected in-service date.
internal restructuringThe Atlantic Coast Pipeline has experienced challenges to its permits since construction began in 2018. During the third and fourth quarters 2018, a FERC stop work order, together with delays in obtaining permits necessary for construction and construction delays due to judicial actions, impacted the cost and schedule for the project. As a result, total project cost estimates have increased from between $6.0 billion and $6.5 billion to between $7.0 billion and $7.8 billion, excluding financing costs. Southern Company Gas' share of the total project costs is 5% and Southern Company Gas' investment at December 31, 2018 totaled $83 million. The operator of the joint venture currently expects to achieve a late 2020 in-service date for at least key segments of the Atlantic Coast Pipeline, while the remainder may extend into early 2021. Southern Company Gas has evaluated the recoverability of its investment and determined there was no impairment as of December 31, 2018. Abnormal weather, work delays (including due to judicial or regulatory action), and other restructuring options thatconditions may be pursued;
potential business strategies, including acquisitionsresult in additional cost or dispositions of assets or businesses, including the proposed disposition by a wholly-owned subsidiaryschedule modifications, which could result in an impairment of Southern Company GasGas' investment and could have a material impact on Southern Company's financial statements.
The ultimate outcome of Elizabethtown Gas and Elkton Gas and the potential sale of a 33% equity interest in substantially all of Southern Power's solar assets, whichthese matters cannot be assured to be completed or beneficial to Southern Company or its subsidiaries;
the possibility that the anticipated benefits from the Merger cannot be fully realized or may take longer to realize than expecteddetermined at this time. See Notes 7 and the possibility that costs related9 to the integration of Southern Company and financial statements under "Southern Company Gas will be greater than expected;Equity Method Investments" and "Guarantees," respectively, for additional information on these pipeline projects.
Regulatory Matters
Alabama Power
Alabama Power's revenues from regulated retail operations are collected through various rate mechanisms subject to the abilityoversight of counterparties of Southern Companythe Alabama PSC. Alabama Power currently recovers its costs from the regulated retail business primarily through Rate RSE, Rate CNP, Rate ECR, and its subsidiariesRate NDR. In addition, the Alabama PSC issues accounting orders to make payments asaddress current events impacting Alabama Power. See Note 2 to the financial statements under "Alabama Power" for additional information regarding Alabama Power's rate mechanisms and accounting orders.
Rate RSE
The Alabama PSC has adopted Rate RSE that provides for periodic annual adjustments based upon Alabama Power's projected weighted common equity return (WCER) compared to an allowable range. Rate RSE adjustments are based on forward-looking information for the applicable upcoming calendar year. Rate RSE adjustments for any two-year period, when due and to perform as required;
the ability to obtain new short- and long-term contracts with wholesale customers;
the direct or indirect effect on the Southern Company system's business resulting from cyber intrusion or physical attack and the threat of physical attacks;
interest rate fluctuations and financial market conditions and the results of financing efforts;
changes in Southern Company'saveraged together, cannot exceed 4.0% and any of its subsidiaries' credit ratings, including impacts on interest rates, accessannual adjustment is limited to capital markets, and collateral requirements;
5.0%. When the impacts of any sovereign financial issues, including impacts on interest rates, access to capital markets, impacts on foreign currency exchange rates, counterparty performance, andprojected WCER is under the economy in general, as well as potential impacts on the benefits of the DOE loan guarantees;
the ability of Southern Company's electric utilities to obtain additional generating capacity (or sell excess generating capacity) at competitive prices;
catastrophic events such as fires, earthquakes, explosions, floods, tornadoes, hurricanes and other storms, droughts, pandemic health events such as influenzas, or other similar occurrences;
the direct or indirect effects on the Southern Company system's business resulting from incidents affecting the U.S. electric grid, natural gas pipeline infrastructure, or operation of generating or storage resources;
impairments of goodwill or long-lived assets;
the effect of accounting pronouncements issued periodically by standard-setting bodies; and
other factors discussed elsewhere herein and in other reports filed by Southern Company from time to time with the SEC.
Southern Company expressly disclaims any obligation to update any forward-looking statements.

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME
For the Years Ended December 31, 2017, 2016, and 2015
Southern Company and Subsidiary Companies 2017 Annual Report
 2017
 2016
 2015
 (in millions)
Operating Revenues:     
Retail electric revenues$15,330
 $15,234
 $14,987
Wholesale electric revenues2,426
 1,926
 1,798
Other electric revenues681
 698
 657
Natural gas revenues3,791
 1,596
 
Other revenues803
 442
 47
Total operating revenues23,031
 19,896
 17,489
Operating Expenses:     
Fuel4,400
 4,361
 4,750
Purchased power863
 750
 645
Cost of natural gas1,601
 613
 
Cost of other sales513
 260
 
Other operations and maintenance5,481
 5,240
 4,416
Depreciation and amortization3,010
 2,502
 2,034
Taxes other than income taxes1,250
 1,113
 997
Estimated loss on Kemper IGCC3,362
 428
 365
Total operating expenses20,480
 15,267
 13,207
Operating Income2,551
 4,629
 4,282
Other Income and (Expense):     
Allowance for equity funds used during construction160
 202
 226
Earnings from equity method investments106
 59
 
Interest expense, net of amounts capitalized(1,694) (1,317) (840)
Other income (expense), net(55) (93) (39)
Total other income and (expense)(1,483) (1,149) (653)
Earnings Before Income Taxes1,068
 3,480
 3,629
Income taxes142
 951
 1,194
Consolidated Net Income926
 2,529
 2,435
Less:     
Dividends on preferred and preference stock of subsidiaries38
 45
 54
Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests46
 36
 14
Consolidated Net Income Attributable to Southern Company$842
 $2,448
 $2,367
Common Stock Data:     
Earnings per share —     
Basic$0.84
 $2.57
 $2.60
Diluted0.84
 2.55
 2.59
Average number of shares of common stock outstanding — (in millions)     
Basic1,000
 951
 910
Diluted1,008
 958
 914
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME
For the Years Ended December 31, 2017, 2016, and 2015
Southern Company and Subsidiary Companies 2017 Annual Report
 2017
 2016
 2015
 (in millions)
Consolidated Net Income$926
 $2,529
 $2,435
Other comprehensive income:     
Qualifying hedges:     
Changes in fair value, net of tax of $34, $(84), and $(8), respectively57
 (136) (13)
Reclassification adjustment for amounts included in net
income, net of tax of $(37), $43, and $4, respectively
(60) 69
 6
Pension and other postretirement benefit plans:     
Benefit plan net gain (loss), net of tax of $6, $10, and $(1),
respectively
17
 13
 (2)
Reclassification adjustment for amounts included in net income, net of
tax of $(6), $3, and $4, respectively
(23) 4
 7
Total other comprehensive income (loss)(9) (50) (2)
Less:     
Dividends on preferred and preference stock of subsidiaries38
 45
 54
Comprehensive income attributable to noncontrolling interests46
 36
 14
Consolidated Comprehensive Income Attributable to Southern Company$833
 $2,398
 $2,365
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
For the Years Ended December 31, 2017, 2016, and 2015
Southern Company and Subsidiary Companies 2017 Annual Report
 2017
 2016
 2015
   (in millions)
Operating Activities:     
Consolidated net income$926
 $2,529
 $2,435
Adjustments to reconcile consolidated net income
to net cash provided from operating activities —
     
Depreciation and amortization, total3,457
 2,923
 2,395
Deferred income taxes166
 (127) 1,404
Collateral deposits(4) (102) 
Allowance for equity funds used during construction(160) (202) (226)
Pension and postretirement funding(2) (1,029) (7)
Settlement of asset retirement obligations(177) (171) (37)
Stock based compensation expense109
 121
 99
Hedge settlements6
 (233) (17)
Estimated loss on Kemper IGCC3,179
 428
 365
Income taxes receivable, non-current(47) (122) (413)
Other, net(109) (99) 49
Changes in certain current assets and liabilities —     
-Receivables(199) (544) 243
-Fossil fuel for generation36
 178
 61
-Natural gas for sale36
 (226) 
-Other current assets(143) (206) (152)
-Accounts payable(280) 301
 (353)
-Accrued taxes(142) 1,456
 352
-Retail fuel cost over recovery(212) (231) 289
-Mirror CWIP
 
 (271)
-Other current liabilities(45) 250
 58
Net cash provided from operating activities6,395
 4,894
 6,274
Investing Activities:     
Business acquisitions, net of cash acquired(1,070) (10,689) (1,719)
Property additions(7,423) (7,310) (5,674)
Proceeds pursuant to the Toshiba Guarantee, net of joint owner portion               1,682
 
 
Investment in restricted cash(17) (733) (160)
Distribution of restricted cash34
 742
 154
Nuclear decommissioning trust fund purchases(811) (1,160) (1,424)
Nuclear decommissioning trust fund sales805
 1,154
 1,418
Cost of removal, net of salvage(313) (245) (167)
Change in construction payables, net259
 (121) 402
Investment in unconsolidated subsidiaries(152) (1,444) 
Payments pursuant to LTSAs(227) (134) (197)
Other investing activities42
 (108) 87
Net cash used for investing activities(7,191) (20,048) (7,280)
Financing Activities:     
Increase (decrease) in notes payable, net(401) 1,228
 73
Proceeds —     
Long-term debt5,858
 16,368
 7,029
Common stock793
 3,758
 256
Preferred stock250
 
 
Short-term borrowings1,259
 
 755
Redemptions and repurchases —     
Long-term debt(2,930) (3,145) (3,604)
Common stock
 
 (115)
Interest-bearing refundable deposits
 
 (275)
Preferred and preference stock(658) 
 (412)
Short-term borrowings(659) (478) (255)
Distributions to noncontrolling interests(119) (72) (18)
Capital contributions from noncontrolling interests80
 682
 341
Payment of common stock dividends(2,300) (2,104) (1,959)
Other financing activities(222) (512) (116)
Net cash provided from financing activities951
 15,725
 1,700
Net Change in Cash and Cash Equivalents155
 571
 694
Cash and Cash Equivalents at Beginning of Year1,975
 1,404
 710
Cash and Cash Equivalents at End of Year$2,130
 $1,975
 $1,404
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
At December 31, 2017 and 2016
Southern Company and Subsidiary Companies 2017 Annual Report
Assets2017
 2016
 (in millions)
Current Assets:   
Cash and cash equivalents$2,130
 $1,975
Receivables —   
Customer accounts receivable1,806
 1,583
Energy marketing receivable607
 623
Unbilled revenues810
 706
Under recovered fuel clause revenues171
 
Income taxes receivable, current63
 544
Other accounts and notes receivable635
 377
Accumulated provision for uncollectible accounts(44) (43)
Materials and supplies1,438
 1,462
Fossil fuel for generation594
 689
Natural gas for sale595
 631
Prepaid expenses452
 364
Other regulatory assets, current604
 581
Other current assets211
 230
Total current assets10,072
 9,722
Property, Plant, and Equipment:   
In service103,542
 98,416
Less: Accumulated depreciation31,457
 29,852
Plant in service, net of depreciation72,085
 68,564
Nuclear fuel, at amortized cost883
 905
Construction work in progress6,904
 8,977
Total property, plant, and equipment79,872
 78,446
Other Property and Investments:   
Goodwill6,268

6,251
Equity investments in unconsolidated subsidiaries1,513

1,549
Other intangible assets, net of amortization of $186 and $62
at December 31, 2017 and December 31, 2016, respectively
873
 970
Nuclear decommissioning trusts, at fair value1,832
 1,606
Leveraged leases775
 774
Miscellaneous property and investments249
 270
Total other property and investments11,510
 11,420
Deferred Charges and Other Assets:   
Deferred charges related to income taxes825
 1,629
Unamortized loss on reacquired debt206
 223
Other regulatory assets, deferred6,943
 6,851
Other deferred charges and assets1,577
 1,406
Total deferred charges and other assets9,551
 10,109
Total Assets$111,005
 $109,697
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.allowed range, there is
    Table of Contents                                Index to Financial Statements

CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
At December 31, 2017 and 2016MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS (continued)
Southern Company and Subsidiary Companies 2017 Annual Report
Liabilities and Stockholders' Equity2017
 2016
 (in millions)
Current Liabilities:   
Securities due within one year$3,892
 $2,587
Notes payable2,439
 2,241
Energy marketing trade payables546
 597
Accounts payable2,530
 2,228
Customer deposits542
 558
Accrued taxes —   
Accrued income taxes6
 193
Unrecognized tax benefits18
 385
Other accrued taxes613
 667
Accrued interest488
 518
Accrued compensation959
 915
Asset retirement obligations, current351
 378
Acquisitions payable5
 489
Other regulatory liabilities, current337
 236
Other current liabilities868
 925
Total current liabilities13,594
 12,917
Long-Term Debt (See accompanying statements)
44,462
 42,629
Deferred Credits and Other Liabilities:   
Accumulated deferred income taxes6,842
 14,092
Deferred credits related to income taxes7,256
 219
Accumulated deferred ITCs2,267
 2,228
Employee benefit obligations2,256
 2,299
Asset retirement obligations, deferred4,473
 4,136
Accrued environmental remediation389
 397
Other cost of removal obligations2,684
 2,748
Other regulatory liabilities, deferred239
 258
Other deferred credits and liabilities691
 880
Total deferred credits and other liabilities27,097
 27,257
Total Liabilities85,153
 82,803
Redeemable Preferred Stock of Subsidiaries (See accompanying statements)
324
 118
Redeemable Noncontrolling Interests (See accompanying statements)

 164
Total Stockholders' Equity (See accompanying statements)
25,528
 26,612
Total Liabilities and Stockholders' Equity$111,005
 $109,697
Commitments and Contingent Matters (See notes)

 
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CAPITALIZATION
At December 31, 2017 and 2016
Southern Company and Subsidiary Companies 20172018 Annual Report

   2017
 2016
 2017
 2016
   (in millions)  (percent of total)
Long-Term Debt:         
Long-term debt payable to affiliated trusts —         
Variable rate (4.44% at 12/31/17) due 2042  $206
 $206
    
Long-term senior notes and debt —         
MaturityInterest Rates        
20171.30% to 7.20% 
 2,019
    
20181.50% to 5.40% 2,402
 2,403
    
20191.85% to 5.55% 3,074
 3,076
    
20202.00% to 4.75% 2,273
 1,326
    
20212.35% to 9.10% 2,643
 2,655
    
20221.00% to 8.70% 2,016
 1,378
    
2023 through 20471.85% to 7.30% 22,142
 20,369
    
Variable rates (1.82% to 3.75% at 1/1/17) due 2017  
 461
    
Variable rates (2.29% to 3.05% at 12/31/17) due 2018  1,420
 1,520
    
Variable rates (2.04% to 2.18% at 12/31/17) due 2020  825
 
    
Variable rates (2.55% to 2.79% at 12/31/17) due 2021  25
 25
    
Variable rate (3.75% at 1/1/17) due 2032 to 2036  
 15
    
Total long-term senior notes and debt  36,820
 35,247
    
Other long-term debt —         
Pollution control revenue bonds —         
MaturityInterest Rates        
20194.55% 25
 25
    
20222.10% to 2.35% 90
 90
    
2023 through 20491.15% to 5.15% 1,379
 1,339
    
Variable rates (2.45% to 2.50% at 12/31/17) due 2018  40
 76
    
Variable rates (1.86% to 1.87% at 12/31/17) due 2021  65
 65
    
Variable rates (1.83% to 1.84% at 12/31/17) due 2022  17
 17
    
Variable rates (1.59% to 1.88% at 12/31/17) due 2024 to 2053  1,680
 1,721
    
Plant Daniel revenue bonds (7.13%) due 2021  270
 270
    
FFB loans —         
2.57% to 3.86% due 2020  44
 44
    
2.57% to 3.86% due 2021  44
 44
    
2.57% to 3.86% due 2022  44
 44
    
2.57% to 3.86% due 2023 to 2044  2,493
 2,493
    
First mortgage bonds —         
4.70% due 2019  50
 50
    
2.66% to 6.58% due 2023 to 2057  975
 575
    
Gas facility revenue bonds —         
Variable rate (1.71% at 12/31/17) due 2022  47
 47
    
Variable rate (1.71% at 12/31/17) due 2024 to 2033  154
 154
    
Junior subordinated notes (5.00% to 6.25%) due 2057 to 2077  3,570
 2,350
    
Total other long-term debt  10,987
 9,404
    
Unamortized fair value adjustment of long-term debt  525
 578
    
Capitalized lease obligations  204
 136
    
Unamortized debt premium  44
 52
    
Unamortized debt discount  (206) (194)    
Unamortized debt issuance expense  (226) (213)    
Total long-term debt (annual interest requirement — $1.8 billion) 48,354
 45,216
    
Less amount due within one year  3,892
 2,587
    
Long-term debt excluding amount due within one year  44,462
 42,629
 63.2% 61.3%
          

an adjusting point of 5.98% and eligibility for a performance-based adder of seven basis points, or 0.07%, to the WCER adjusting point if Alabama Power (i) has an "A" credit rating equivalent with at least one of the recognized rating agencies or (ii) is in the top one-third of a designated customer value benchmark survey. If Alabama Power's actual retail return is above the allowed WCER range, the excess will be refunded to customers unless otherwise directed by the Alabama PSC; however, there is no provision for additional customer billings should the actual retail return fall below the WCER range. Prior to January 2019, retail rates remained unchanged when the WCER range was between 5.75% and 6.21%.
On May 1, 2018, the Alabama PSC approved modifications to Rate RSE and other commitments designed to position Alabama Power to address the growing pressure on its credit quality resulting from the Tax Reform Legislation, without increasing retail rates under Rate RSE in the near term. Alabama Power plans to reduce growth in total debt by increasing equity, with corresponding reductions in debt issuances, thereby de-leveraging its capital structure. Alabama Power's goal is to achieve an equity ratio of approximately 55% by the end of 2025. At December 31, 2018, Alabama Power's equity ratio was approximately 47%.
The approved modifications to Rate RSE began for billings in January 2019. The modifications include reducing the top of the allowed WCER range from 6.21% to 6.15% and modifications to the refund mechanism applicable to prior year actual results. The modifications to the refund mechanism allow Alabama Power to retain a portion of the revenue that causes the actual WCER for a given year to exceed the allowed range.
Generally, if Alabama Power's actual WCER is between 6.15% and 7.65%, customers will receive 25% of the amount between 6.15% and 6.65%, 40% of the amount between 6.65% and 7.15%, and 75% of the amount between 7.15% and 7.65%. Customers will receive all amounts in excess of an actual WCER of 7.65%.
In conjunction with these modifications to Rate RSE, on May 8, 2018, Alabama Power consented to a moratorium on any upward adjustments under Rate RSE for 2019 and 2020 and will also return $50 million to customers through bill credits in 2019.
On November 30, 2018, Alabama Power made its required annual Rate RSE submission to the Alabama PSC of projected data for calendar year 2019. Projected earnings were within the specified range; therefore, retail rates under Rate RSE remain unchanged for 2019.
At December 31, 2018, Alabama Power's retail return exceeded the allowed WCER range, which resulted in Alabama Power establishing a regulatory liability of $109 million for Rate RSE refunds. In accordance with an Alabama PSC order issued on February 5, 2019, Alabama Power will apply $75 million to reduce the Rate ECR under recovered balance and the remaining $34 million will be refunded to customers through bill credits in July through September 2019.
Rate CNP PPA
Alabama Power's retail rates, approved by the Alabama PSC, provide for adjustments under Rate CNP to recognize the placing of new generating facilities into retail service. Alabama Power may also recover retail costs associated with certificated PPAs under Rate CNP PPA. No adjustments to Rate CNP PPA occurred during the period 2016 through 2018 and no adjustment is expected in 2019.
In accordance with an accounting order issued in February 2017 by the Alabama PSC, Alabama Power reclassified $69 million of the December 31, 2016 Rate CNP PPA under recovered balance to a separate regulatory asset. The amortization of the new regulatory asset through Rate RSE will begin concurrently with the effective date of Alabama Power's next depreciation study, which is expected to occur no later than 2022.
Rate CNP Compliance
Rate CNP Compliance allows for the recovery of Alabama Power's retail costs associated with laws, regulations, and other such mandates directed at the utility industry involving the environment, security, reliability, safety, sustainability, or similar considerations impacting Alabama Power's facilities or operations. Rate CNP Compliance is based on forward-looking information and provides for the recovery of these costs pursuant to a factor that is calculated annually. Compliance costs to be recovered include operations and maintenance expenses, depreciation, and a return on certain invested capital. Revenues for Rate CNP Compliance, as recorded on the financial statements, are adjusted for differences in actual recoverable costs and amounts billed in current regulated rates. Accordingly, changes in the billing factor will have no significant effect on revenues or net income, but will affect annual cash flow. Changes in Rate CNP Compliance-related operations and maintenance expenses and depreciation generally will have no effect on net income.
In accordance with an accounting order issued in February 2017 by the Alabama PSC, Alabama Power reclassified $36 million of its under recovered balance in Rate CNP Compliance to a separate regulatory asset. The amortization of the new regulatory asset
    Table of Contents                                Index to Financial Statements

MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS (continued)
Southern Company and Subsidiary Companies 2018 Annual Report


through Rate RSE will begin concurrently with the effective date of Alabama Power's next depreciation study, which is expected to occur no later than 2022.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CAPITALIZATION (continued)
At December 31, 2017 and 2016
Southern Company and Subsidiary Companies 2017 Annual Report
        
   2017
 2016
 2017
 2016
   (in millions)  (percent of total)
Redeemable Preferred Stock of Subsidiaries:         
Cumulative preferred stock         
$100 par or stated value — 4.20% to 5.44%         
Authorized — 20 million shares         
Outstanding — 1 million shares  324
 81
    
$1 par value — 5.83%         
Authorized — 28 million shares         
Outstanding — 2017: no shares         
                    — 2016: 2 million shares: $25 stated value  
 37
    
Total redeemable preferred stock of subsidiaries
(annual dividend requirement — $16 million)
  324
 118
 0.5
 0.2
Redeemable Noncontrolling Interests  
 164
 
 0.2
Common Stockholders' Equity:         
Common stock, par value $5 per share —  5,038
 4,952
    
Authorized — 1.5 billion shares         
Issued — 2017: 1.0 billion shares         
  — 2016: 991 million shares         
Treasury — 2017: 0.9 million shares         
      — 2016: 0.8 million shares         
Paid-in capital  10,469
 9,661
    
Treasury, at cost  (36) (31)    
Retained earnings  8,885
 10,356
    
Accumulated other comprehensive loss  (189) (180)    
Total common stockholders' equity  24,167
 24,758
 34.4
 35.6
Preferred and Preference Stock of Subsidiaries
   and Noncontrolling Interests:
         
Non-cumulative preferred stock         
$25 par value — 6.00% to 6.13%         
Authorized — 60 million shares         
Outstanding — 2017: no shares         
                     — 2016: 2 million shares  
 45
    
Non-cumulative preference stock         
$1 par value — 6.45% to 6.50%         
Authorized — 65 million shares         
Outstanding — 2017: no shares  
 196
    
 — 2016: 8 million shares         
$100 par or stated value — 5.60% to 6.50%         
Outstanding — 2017: no shares  
 368
    
                     — 2016: 4 million shares         
Noncontrolling interests  1,361
 1,245
    
Total preferred and preference stock of subsidiaries and
noncontrolling interests
  1,361
 1,854
 1.9
 2.7
Total stockholders' equity  25,528
 26,612
    
Total Capitalization  $70,314
 $69,523
 100.0% 100.0%
On November 30, 2018, Alabama Power submitted calculations associated with its cost of complying with environmental mandates, as provided under Rate CNP Compliance. The filing reflected a projected unrecovered retail revenue requirement for environmental compliance of approximately $205 million, which is being recovered in the billing months of January 2019 through December 2019.

Tax Reform Accounting Order
On May 1, 2018, the Alabama PSC approved an accounting order that authorized Alabama Power to defer the benefits of federal excess deferred income taxes associated with the Tax Reform Legislation for the year ended December 31, 2018 as a regulatory liability and to use up to $30 million of such deferrals to offset under recovered amounts under Rate ECR. The accompanying notesestimated deferrals for the year ended December 31, 2018 totaled approximately $63 million, subject to adjustment following the filing of the 2018 tax return, of which $30 million was used to offset the Rate ECR under recovered balance and $33 million is recorded in other regulatory liabilities, deferred on the balance sheet to be used for the benefit of customers as determined by the Alabama PSC at a future date. See Note 10 to the financial statements under "Current and Deferred Income Taxes" for additional information.
Environmental Accounting Order
Based on an order from the Alabama PSC (Environmental Accounting Order), Alabama Power is allowed to establish a regulatory asset to record the unrecovered investment costs, including the unrecovered plant asset balance and the unrecovered costs associated with site removal and closure associated with future unit retirements caused by environmental regulations. The regulatory asset is being amortized and recovered over the affected unit's remaining useful life, as established prior to the decision regarding early retirement through Rate CNP Compliance. At December 31, 2018, this regulatory asset had a balance of $42 million. See "Environmental MattersEnvironmental Laws and Regulations" herein for additional information regarding environmental regulations.
Subsequent to December 31, 2018, Alabama Power determined that Plant Gorgas Units 8, 9, and 10 (approximately 1,000 MWs) will be retired by April 15, 2019 due to the expected costs of compliance with federal and state environmental regulations. In accordance with the Environmental Accounting Order, approximately $740 million of net investment costs will be transferred to a regulatory asset at the retirement date and recovered over the affected units' remaining useful lives, as established prior to the decision to retire.
Georgia Power
Georgia Power's revenues from regulated retail operations are collected through various rate mechanisms subject to the oversight of the Georgia PSC. Georgia Power currently recovers its costs from the regulated retail business through the 2013 ARP, which includes traditional base tariff rates, Demand-Side Management (DSM) tariffs, Environmental Compliance Cost Recovery (ECCR) tariffs, and Municipal Franchise Fee (MFF) tariffs. Georgia Power is scheduled to file a base rate case by July 1, 2019, which may continue or modify these tariffs. In addition, financing costs on certified construction costs of Plant Vogtle Units 3 and 4 are being collected through the NCCR tariff and fuel costs are collected through a separate fuel cost recovery tariff. See Note 2 to the financial statements under "Georgia Power" for additional information.
Rate Plans
Pursuant to the terms and conditions of a settlement agreement related to Southern Company's acquisition of Southern Company Gas approved by the Georgia PSC in 2016, the 2013 ARP will continue in effect until December 31, 2019, and Georgia Power will be required to file its next base rate case by July 1, 2019. Furthermore, through December 31, 2019, Georgia Power will retain its merger savings, net of transition costs, as defined in the settlement agreement; through December 31, 2022, such net merger savings will be shared on a 60/40 basis with customers; thereafter, all merger savings will be retained by customers. See Note 15 to the financial statements under "Southern Company Merger with Southern Company Gas" for additional information regarding the Merger.
There were no changes to Georgia Power's traditional base tariff rates, ECCR tariff, DSM tariffs, or MFF tariff in 2017 or 2018.
Under the 2013 ARP, Georgia Power's retail ROE is set at 10.95% and earnings are evaluated against a retail ROE range of 10.00% to 12.00%. Two-thirds of any earnings above 12.00% will be directly refunded to customers, with the remaining one-third retained by Georgia Power. There will be no recovery of any earnings shortfall below 10.00% on an integral part of these consolidated financial statements. actual basis. In 2016, Georgia Power's retail ROE exceeded 12.00%, and Georgia Power refunded to retail customers in 2018 approximately $40 million as approved by the Georgia PSC. On February 5, 2019, the Georgia PSC approved a settlement between Georgia Power and the staff
    Table of Contents                                Index to Financial Statements

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY
For the Years Ended December 31, 2017, 2016, and 2015MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS (continued)
Southern Company and Subsidiary Companies 20172018 Annual Report

 Southern Company Common Stockholders' Equity     
 Number of Common Shares Common Stock   
Accumulated
Other
Comprehensive Income
(Loss)
 
Preferred
and Preference Stock of Subsidiaries
 
Noncontrolling
Interests
 
 Issued Treasury Par Value Paid-In Capital Treasury Retained Earnings   Total
 (in thousands) (in millions)
Balance at December 31, 2014908,502
 (725) $4,539
 $5,955
 $(26) $9,609
 $(128) $756
 $221
$20,926
Consolidated net income attributable
   to Southern Company

 
 
 
 
 2,367
 
 
 
2,367
Other comprehensive income (loss)
 
 
 
 
 
 (2) 
 
(2)
Stock issued6,571
 (2,599) 33
 223
 
 
 
 
 
256
Stock-based compensation
 
 
 100
 
 
 
 
 
100
Stock repurchased, at cost
 
 
 
 (115) 
 
 
 
(115)
Cash dividends of $2.1525 per share
 
 
 
 
 (1,959) 
 
 
(1,959)
Preference stock redemption
 
 
 
 
 
 
 (150) 
(150)
Contributions from
   noncontrolling interests

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 567
567
Distributions to
   noncontrolling interests

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 (18)(18)
Net loss attributable to
   noncontrolling interests

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 12
12
Other
 (28) 
 4
 (1) (7) 
 3
 (1)(2)
Balance at December 31, 2015915,073
 (3,352) 4,572
 6,282
 (142) 10,010
 (130) 609
 781
21,982
Consolidated net income attributable
   to Southern Company

 
 
 
 
 2,448
 
 
 
2,448
Other comprehensive income (loss)
 
 
 
 
 
 (50) 
 
(50)
Stock issued76,140
 2,599
 380
 3,263
 115
 
 
 
 
3,758
Stock-based compensation
 
 
 120
 
 
 
 
 
120
Cash dividends of $2.2225 per share
 
 
 
 
 (2,104) 
 
 
(2,104)
Contributions from
   noncontrolling interests

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 618
618
Distributions to
   noncontrolling interests

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 (57)(57)
Purchase of membership interests
   from noncontrolling interests

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 (129)(129)
Net income attributable to
   noncontrolling interests

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 32
32
Other
 (66) 
 (4) (4) 2
 
 
 
(6)
Balance at December 31, 2016991,213
 (819) 4,952
 9,661
 (31) 10,356
 (180) 609
 1,245
26,612
Consolidated net income attributable
   to Southern Company

 
 
 
 
 842
 
 
 
842
Other comprehensive income (loss)
 
 
 
 
 
 (9) 
 
(9)
Stock issued17,319
 
 86
 707
 
 
 
 
 
793
Stock-based compensation
 
 
 105
 
 
 
 
 
105
Cash dividends of $2.3000 per share
 
 
 
 
 (2,300) 
 
 
(2,300)
Preferred and preference stock
   redemptions

 
 
 
 
 
 
 (609) 
(609)
Contributions from
   noncontrolling interests

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 79
79
Distributions to
   noncontrolling interests

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 (122)(122)
Net income attributable to
   noncontrolling interests

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 44
44
Reclassification from redeemable
noncontrolling interests

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 114
114
Other
 (110) 
 (4) (5) (13) 
 
 1
(21)
Balance at December 31, 20171,008,532
 (929) $5,038
 $10,469
 $(36) $8,885
 $(189) $
 $1,361
$25,528

of the Georgia PSC under which Georgia Power's retail ROE for 2017 was stipulated to exceed 12.00% and Georgia Power will reduce certain regulatory assets by approximately $4 million in lieu of providing refunds to retail customers. In 2018, Georgia Power's retail ROE exceeded 12.00%, and Georgia Power accrued approximately $100 million to refund to retail customers, subject to review and approval by the Georgia PSC.
On April 3, 2018, the Georgia PSC approved the Georgia Power Tax Reform Settlement Agreement. Pursuant to the Georgia Power Tax Reform Settlement Agreement, to reflect the federal income tax rate reduction impact of the Tax Reform Legislation, Georgia Power will refund to customers a total of $330 million through bill credits. Georgia Power issued bill credits of approximately $130 million in 2018 and will issue bill credits of approximately $95 million in June 2019 and $105 million in February 2020. In addition, Georgia Power is deferring as a regulatory liability (i) the revenue equivalent of the tax expense reduction resulting from legislation lowering the Georgia state income tax rate from 6.00% to 5.75% in 2019 and (ii) the entire benefit of federal and state excess accumulated deferred income taxes, which is expected to total approximately $700 million at December 31, 2019. At December 31, 2018, the related regulatory liability balance totaled $610 million. The amortization of these regulatory liabilities is expected to be addressed in the Georgia Power 2019 Base Rate Case. If there is not a base rate case in 2019, customers will receive $185 million in annual bill credits beginning in 2020, with any additional federal and state income tax savings deferred as a regulatory liability, until Georgia Power's next base rate case.
To address some of the negative cash flow and credit quality impacts of the Tax Reform Legislation, the Georgia PSC also approved an increase in Georgia Power's retail equity ratio to the lower of (i) Georgia Power's actual common equity weight in its capital structure or (ii) 55%, until the Georgia Power 2019 Base Rate Case. At December 31, 2018, Georgia Power's actual retail common equity ratio (on a 13-month average basis) was approximately 55%. Benefits from reduced federal income tax rates in excess of the amounts refunded to customers will be retained by Georgia Power to cover the carrying costs of the incremental equity in 2018 and 2019.
Integrated Resource Plan
See "Environmental Matters" herein for additional information regarding proposed and final EPA rules and regulations, including revisions to ELG for steam electric power plants and additional regulations of CCR and CO2.
In 2016, the Georgia PSC approved Georgia Power's triennial Integrated Resource Plan (2016 IRP) including the reclassification of the remaining net book value of Plant Mitchell Unit 3 and costs associated with materials and supplies remaining at the unit retirement date to a regulatory asset. Recovery of the unit's net book value will continue through December 31, 2019, as provided in the 2013 ARP. The timing of the recovery of the remaining balance of the unit's net book value as of December 31, 2019 and costs associated with materials and supplies remaining at the unit retirement date was deferred for consideration in the Georgia Power 2019 Base Rate Case.
In the 2016 IRP, the Georgia PSC also approved recovery of costs up to $99 million through June 30, 2019 to preserve nuclear generation as an option at a future generation site in Stewart County, Georgia. In March 2017, the Georgia PSC approved Georgia Power's decision to suspend work at the site due to changing economics, including lower load forecasts and fuel costs. The timing of recovery for costs incurred of approximately $50 million is expected to be determined by the Georgia PSC in the Georgia Power 2019 Base Rate Case.
On January 31, 2019, Georgia Power filed its triennial IRP (2019 IRP). The filing includes a request to decertify and retire Plant Hammond Units 1 through 4 (840 MWs) and Plant McIntosh Unit 1 (142.5 MWs) upon approval of the 2019 IRP.
In the 2019 IRP, Georgia Power requested approval to reclassify the remaining net book value of Plant Hammond Units 1 through 4 (approximately $520 million at December 31, 2018) upon retirement to a regulatory asset to be amortized ratably over a period equal to the applicable unit's remaining useful life through 2035. For Plant McIntosh Unit 1, Georgia Power requested approval to reclassify the remaining net book value (approximately $40 million at December 31, 2018) upon retirement to a regulatory asset to be amortized over a three-year period to be determined in the Georgia Power 2019 Base Rate Case. Georgia Power also requested approval to reclassify any unusable material and supplies inventory balances remaining at the applicable unit's retirement date to a regulatory asset for recovery over a period to be determined in the Georgia Power 2019 Base Rate Case.
The 2019 IRP also includes a request to certify approximately 25 MWs of capacity at Plant Scherer Unit 3 for the retail jurisdiction beginning January 1, 2020, following the expiration of a wholesale PPA.
The accompanying notes are an integral part2019 IRP also includes details regarding ARO costs associated with ash pond and landfill closures and post-closure care. Georgia Power requested the timing and rate of recovery of these consolidatedcosts be determined by the Georgia PSC in the Georgia Power 2019 Base Rate Case. See "Environmental Matters – Environmental Laws and Regulations – Coal Combustion Residuals" and FINANCIAL CONDITION AND LIQUIDITY – "Capital Requirements and Contractual Obligations" herein and Note 6 to the financial statements.statements for additional information regarding Georgia Power's AROs.
    Table of Contents                                Index to Financial Statements

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTSMANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS (continued)
Southern Company and Subsidiary Companies 20172018 Annual Report



Georgia Power also requested approval to issue two capacity-based requests for proposals (RFP). If approved, the first capacity-based RFP will seek resources that can provide capacity beginning in 2022 or 2023 and the second capacity-based RFP will seek resources that can provide capacity beginning in 2026, 2027, or 2028. Additionally, the 2019 IRP includes a request to procure an additional 1,000 MWs of renewable resources through a competitive bidding process. Georgia Power also proposed to invest in a portfolio of up to 50 MWs of battery energy storage technologies.

A decision from the Georgia PSC on the 2019 IRP is expected in mid-2019.

The ultimate outcome of these matters cannot be determined at this time.
IndexStorm Damage Recovery
Georgia Power is accruing $30 million annually through December 31, 2019, as provided in the 2013 ARP, for incremental operations and maintenance costs of damage from major storms to its transmission and distribution facilities. At December 31, 2018, the total balance in the regulatory asset related to storm damage was $416 million. During October 2018, Hurricane Michael caused significant damage to Georgia Power's transmission and distribution facilities. The incremental restoration costs related to this hurricane deferred in the regulatory asset for storm damage totaled approximately $115 million. Hurricanes Irma and Matthew also caused significant damage to Georgia Power's transmission and distribution facilities during September 2017 and October 2016, respectively. The incremental restoration costs related to Hurricanes Irma and Matthew deferred in Georgia Power's regulatory asset for storm damage totaled approximately $250 million. The rate of storm damage cost recovery is expected to be adjusted as part of the Georgia Power 2019 Base Rate Case and further adjusted in future regulatory proceedings as necessary. The ultimate outcome of this matter cannot be determined at this time. See Note 2 to the Notesfinancial statements under "Georgia PowerStorm Damage Recovery" for additional information regarding Georgia Power's storm damage reserve.
Mississippi Power
Mississippi Power's retail base rates generally are set under the PEP, a rate plan approved by the Mississippi PSC. Two filings are made for each calendar year: the PEP projected filing, which is typically filed prior to Financial Statementsthe beginning of the year based on a projected revenue requirement, and the PEP lookback filing, which is filed after the end of the year and allows for review of the actual revenue requirement compared to the projected filing.

On February 7, 2018, Mississippi Power revised its annual projected PEP filing for 2018 to reflect the impacts of the Tax Reform Legislation. The revised filing requested an increase of $26 million in annual revenues, based on a performance adjusted ROE of 9.33% and an increased equity ratio of 55%. On July 27, 2018, Mississippi Power and the MPUS entered into a settlement agreement with respect to the 2018 PEP filing and all unresolved PEP filings for prior years (PEP Settlement Agreement), which was approved by the Mississippi PSC on August 7, 2018. Rates under the PEP Settlement Agreement became effective with the first billing cycle of September 2018. The PEP Settlement Agreement provides for an increase of approximately $21.6 million in annual base retail revenues, which excludes certain compensation costs contested by the MPUS, as well as approximately $2 million which was subsequently approved for recovery through Mississippi Power's 2018 Energy Efficiency Cost Rider.
Pursuant to the PEP Settlement Agreement, Mississippi Power's performance-adjusted allowed ROE is 9.31% and its allowed equity ratio is capped at 51%, pending further review by the Mississippi PSC. In lieu of the requested equity ratio increase, Mississippi Power retained $44 million of excess accumulated deferred income taxes resulting from the Tax Reform Legislation until the conclusion of Mississippi Power's next base rate case, which is scheduled to be filed in the fourth quarter 2019 (Mississippi Power 2019 Base Rate Case). Further, Mississippi Power agreed to seek equity contributions sufficient to restore its equity ratio to 50% by December 31, 2018.
NotePage
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
Pursuant to the PEP Settlement Agreement, PEP proceedings are suspended until after the conclusion of the Mississippi Power 2019 Base Rate Case and Mississippi Power is not required to make any PEP filings for regulatory years 2018, 2019, and 2020. The PEP Settlement Agreement also resolved all open PEP filings with no change to customer rates.

Kemper County Energy Facility

In 2018, Mississippi Power recorded pre-tax charges to income of $37 million ($27 million after tax), primarily resulting from the abandonment and related closure activities and ongoing period costs, net of sales proceeds, for the mine and gasifier-related assets at the Kemper County energy facility. In addition, Mississippi Power recorded a credit to earnings of $95 million in the fourth quarter 2018 primarily resulting from the reduction of a valuation allowance for a state income tax net operating loss (NOL) carryforward associated with the Kemper County energy facility. Additional closure costs for the mine and gasifier-related assets, currently estimated at up to $10 million pre-tax (excluding salvage, net of dismantlement costs), may be incurred through the first half of 2020. In addition, period costs, including, but not limited to, costs for compliance and safety, ARO accretion, and property taxes for the mine and gasifier-related assets, are estimated to total $11 million in 2019 and $2 million to $4 million annually in
    Table of Contents                                Index to Financial Statements

NOTESMANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS (continued)
Southern Company and Subsidiary Companies 20172018 Annual Report


1. SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES
General2020 through 2023. Mississippi Power is currently evaluating its options regarding the final disposition of the CO2 pipeline, including removal of the pipeline. This evaluation is expected to be complete later in 2019. If Mississippi Power ultimately decides to remove the CO2 pipeline, the cost of removal could have a material impact on Southern Company's financial statements. The ultimate outcome of these matters cannot be determined at this time.
The combined cycle and associated common facilities portions of the Kemper County energy facility were dedicated as Plant Ratcliffe on April 27, 2018.
For additional information on the Kemper County energy facility, see Note 2 to the financial statements under "Mississippi PowerKemper County Energy Facility."
Reserve Margin Plan
On August 6, 2018, Mississippi Power filed its proposed Reserve Margin Plan (RMP), as required by the Mississippi PSC's order in the docket established for the purposes of pursuing a global settlement of the costs related to the Kemper County energy facility. Under the RMP, Mississippi Power proposed alternatives that would reduce its reserve margin, with the most economic of the alternatives being the two-year and seven-year acceleration of the retirement of Plant Watson Units 4 and 5, respectively, to the first quarter 2022 and the four-year acceleration of the retirement of Plant Greene County Units 1 and 2 to the third quarter 2021 and the third quarter 2022, respectively, in order to lower or avoid operating costs. The Plant Greene County unit retirements would require the completion by Alabama Power of proposed transmission and system reliability improvements, as well as agreement by Alabama Power. The RMP filing also states that, in the event the Mississippi PSC ultimately approves an alternative that includes an accelerated retirement, Mississippi Power would require authorization to defer in a regulatory asset for future recovery the remaining net book value of the units at the time of retirement. A decision by the Mississippi PSC that does not include recovery of the remaining book value of any generating units retired could have a material impact on Southern Company (Southern Company orCompany's financial statements. The ultimate outcome of this matter cannot be determined at this time.
Government Grants
In 2010, the Company)DOE, through a cooperative agreement with SCS, agreed to fund $270 million of the Kemper County energy facility through the grants awarded to the project by the DOE under the Clean Coal Power Initiative Round 2. Through December 31, 2018, Mississippi Power received total DOE grants of $387 million, of which $382 million reduced the construction costs of the Kemper County energy facility and $5 million reimbursed Mississippi Power for expenses associated with DOE reporting. On December 12, 2018, Mississippi Power filed with the DOE its request for property closeout certification under the contract related to the grants received. Mississippi Power and the DOE are currently in discussions regarding the requested closeout and property disposition, which may require payment to the DOE for a portion of certain property that is the parent companyto be retained by Mississippi Power. The ultimate outcome of four traditional electric operating companies,this matter cannot be determined at this time; however, it could have a significant impact on Southern Power, Company's financial statements.
Southern Company Gas (as
The natural gas distribution utilities are subject to regulation and oversight by their respective state regulatory agencies for the rates charged to their customers and other matters.
The natural gas market for Atlanta Gas Light was deregulated in 1997. Accordingly, Marketers, rather than a traditional utility, sell natural gas to end-use customers in Georgia and handle customer billing functions. Atlanta Gas Light earns revenue for its distribution services by charging rates to its customers based primarily on monthly fixed charges that are set by the Georgia PSC and adjusted periodically.
With the exception of Atlanta Gas Light, the natural gas distribution utilities are authorized by the relevant regulatory agencies in the states in which they serve to use natural gas cost recovery mechanisms that adjust rates to reflect changes in the wholesale cost of natural gas and ensure recovery of all costs prudently incurred in purchasing natural gas for customers. Natural gas cost recovery revenues are adjusted for differences in actual recoverable natural gas costs and amounts billed in current regulated rates. Changes in the billing factor will not have a significant effect on revenues or net income, but will affect cash flows. In addition to natural gas cost recovery mechanisms, there are other cost recovery mechanisms, such as regulatory riders, which vary by utility but allow recovery of certain costs, such as those related to infrastructure replacement programs, as well as environmental remediation and energy efficiency plans. See Note 1 to the financial statements under "Cost of Natural Gas" for additional information.

MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS (continued)
Southern Company and Subsidiary Companies 2018 Annual Report


Infrastructure Replacement Programs and Capital Projects
In addition to capital expenditures recovered through base rates by each of the natural gas distribution utilities, Nicor Gas and Virginia Natural Gas have separate rate riders that provide timely recovery of capital expenditures for specific infrastructure replacement programs. These infrastructure replacement programs and capital projects are risk-based and designed to update and replace cast iron, bare steel, and mid-vintage plastic materials or expand the natural gas distribution systems to improve reliability and meet operational flexibility and growth. The total expected investment under the infrastructure replacement programs for 2019 is $408 million. See Note 2 to the financial statements under "Southern Company GasInfrastructure Replacement Programs and Capital Projects" for additional information.
Rate Proceedings
On February 23, 2018, Atlanta Gas Light revised its annual base rate filing to reflect the impacts of the Tax Reform Legislation and requested a $16 million rate reduction in 2018. On May 15, 2018, the Georgia PSC approved a stipulation for Atlanta Gas Light's annual base rates to remain at the 2017 level for 2018 and 2019, with customer credits of $8 million in each of July 2018 and October 2018 to reflect the impacts of the Tax Reform Legislation. The Georgia PSC maintained Atlanta Gas Light's previously authorized earnings band based on a ROE between 10.55% and 10.95% and increased the allowed equity ratio by 4% to an equity ratio of 55% to address the negative cash flow and credit metric impacts of the Tax Reform Legislation. Additionally, Atlanta Gas Light is required to file a traditional base rate case on or before June 1, 2016), SCS, Southern Linc, Southern Company Holdings, Inc. (Southern Holdings), Southern Nuclear, PowerSecure (as2019 for rates effective January 1, 2020.
On January 31, 2018, the Illinois Commission approved a $137 million increase in Nicor Gas' annual base rate revenues, including $93 million related to the recovery of investments under Nicor Gas' infrastructure program, effective February 8, 2018, based on a ROE of 9.8%.
On May 2, 2018, the Illinois Commission approved Nicor Gas' rehearing request for revised base rates to incorporate the reduction in the federal income tax rate as a result of the Tax Reform Legislation. The resulting decrease of approximately $44 million in annual base rate revenues became effective May 5, 2018. Nicor Gas' previously-authorized capital structure and ROE of 9.80% were not addressed in the rehearing and remain unchanged. On November 9, 2016)2018, Nicor Gas filed a general base rate case with the Illinois Commission requesting a $230 million increase in annual base rate revenues. The requested increase is based on a projected test year for the 12-month period ending September 30, 2020, a ROE of 10.6%, and other directan increase in the equity ratio from 52.0% to 54.0% to address the negative cash flow and indirect subsidiaries. credit metric impacts of the Tax Reform Legislation. The Illinois Commission is expected to rule on the requested increase within the 11-month statutory time limit, after which rate adjustments will be effective. The ultimate outcome of this matter cannot be determined at this time.
Fuel Cost Recovery
The traditional electric operating companies each have established fuel cost recovery rates approved by their respective state PSCs. Fuel cost recovery revenues are adjusted for differences in actual recoverable fuel costs and amounts billed in current regulated rates. Accordingly, changes in the billing factor will not have a significant effect on Southern Company's revenues or net income, but will affect cash flow. The traditional electric operating companies continuously monitor their under or over recovered fuel cost balances and make appropriate filings with their state PSCs to adjust fuel cost recovery rates as necessary.
See Note 1 to the financial statements under "Revenues" and Note 2 to the financial statements under "Alabama PowerRate ECR," "Georgia Power Gulf Power,Fuel Cost Recovery," and "Mississippi PowerFuel Cost Recovery" for additional information.
Construction Program
Overview
The subsidiary companies of Southern Company are vertically integrated utilities providingengaged in continuous construction programs to accommodate existing and estimated future loads on their respective systems. The Southern Company system intends to continue its strategy of developing and constructing new electric servicegenerating facilities, adding environmental modifications to certain existing units, expanding and improving the electric transmission and distribution systems, and updating and expanding the natural gas distribution systems. For the traditional electric operating companies, major generation construction projects are subject to state PSC approval in four Southeastern states.order to be included in retail rates. While Southern Power develops,generally constructs acquires, owns, and manages poweracquires generation assets including renewable energy projects, and sells electricity at market-based rates in the wholesale market.covered by long-term PPAs, any uncontracted capacity could negatively affect future earnings. Southern Company Gas distributesis engaged in various infrastructure improvement programs designed to update or expand the natural gas throughdistribution systems of the natural gas distribution utilities in seven statesto improve reliability and is involved in several other complementary businesses includingmeet operational flexibility and growth. The natural gas marketing services, wholesale gas services,distribution utilities recover their investment and gas midstream operations. SCS,a return associated with these infrastructure programs through their regulated rates. See Note 15 to the system service company, provides, at cost, specialized servicesfinancial statements under "Southern Power" for additional information about costs relating to Southern Power's acquisitions that involve construction of renewable energy facilities and Note 2 to the financial statements under "Southern Company GasInfrastructure Replacement

MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS (continued)
Southern Company and its subsidiary companies. Southern Linc provides digital wireless communicationsSubsidiary Companies 2018 Annual Report


Programs and Capital Projects" for use byadditional information regarding infrastructure improvement programs at the natural gas distribution utilities.
The Southern Company system's construction program is currently estimated to total approximately $8.0 billion, $7.7 billion, $6.7 billion, $6.3 billion, and its subsidiary companies$6.0 billion for 2019, 2020, 2021, 2022, and also markets these services to the public and provides fiber optics services within the Southeast. Southern Holdings is an intermediate holding company subsidiary, primarily for Southern Company's investments2023, respectively. The largest construction project currently underway in leveraged leases and for other electric services. Southern Nuclear operates and provides services to the Southern Company system's nuclear power plantssystem is Plant Vogtle Units 3 and is managing4 (45.7% ownership interest by Georgia Power in the two units, each with approximately 1,100 MWs). See FINANCIAL CONDITION AND LIQUIDITY – "Capital Requirements and Contractual Obligations" herein for additional information regarding Southern Company's capital requirements for its subsidiaries' construction programs.
Nuclear Construction
In 2009, the Georgia PSC certified construction of Plant Vogtle Units 3 and 4. PowerSecureGeorgia Power holds a 45.7% ownership interest in Plant Vogtle Units 3 and 4. In 2012, the NRC issued the related combined construction and operating licenses, which allowed full construction of the two AP1000 nuclear units (with electric generating capacity of approximately 1,100 MWs each) and related facilities to begin. Until March 2017, construction on Plant Vogtle Units 3 and 4 continued under the Vogtle 3 and 4 Agreement, which was a substantially fixed price agreement. In March 2017, the EPC Contractor filed for bankruptcy protection under Chapter 11 of the U.S. Bankruptcy Code.
In connection with the EPC Contractor's bankruptcy filing, Georgia Power, acting for itself and as agent for the Vogtle Owners, entered into the Interim Assessment Agreement with the EPC Contractor to allow construction to continue. The Interim Assessment Agreement expired in July 2017 when Georgia Power, acting for itself and as agent for the other Vogtle Owners, and the EPC Contractor entered into the Vogtle Services Agreement. Under the Vogtle Services Agreement, Westinghouse provides facility design and engineering services, procurement and technical support, and staff augmentation on a time and materials cost basis. The Vogtle Services Agreement provides that it will continue until the start-up and testing of Plant Vogtle Units 3 and 4 are complete and electricity is generated and sold from both units. The Vogtle Services Agreement is terminable by the Vogtle Owners upon 30 days' written notice.
In October 2017, Georgia Power, acting for itself and as agent for the other Vogtle Owners, executed the Bechtel Agreement, a cost reimbursable plus fee arrangement, whereby Bechtel is reimbursed for actual costs plus a base fee and an at-risk fee, which is subject to adjustment based on Bechtel's performance against cost and schedule targets. Each Vogtle Owner is severally (not jointly) liable for its proportionate share, based on its ownership interest, of all amounts owed to Bechtel under the Bechtel Agreement. The Vogtle Owners may terminate the Bechtel Agreement at any time for their convenience, provided that the Vogtle Owners will be required to pay amounts related to work performed prior to the termination (including the applicable portion of the base fee), certain termination-related costs, and, at certain stages of the work, the applicable portion of the at-risk fee. Bechtel may terminate the Bechtel Agreement under certain circumstances, including certain Vogtle Owner suspensions of work, certain breaches of the Bechtel Agreement by the Vogtle Owners, Vogtle Owner insolvency, and certain other events. Pursuant to the Loan Guarantee Agreement between Georgia Power and the DOE, Georgia Power is required to obtain the DOE's approval of the Bechtel Agreement prior to obtaining any further advances under the Loan Guarantee Agreement.
Cost and Schedule
Georgia Power's approximate proportionate share of the remaining estimated capital cost to complete Plant Vogtle Units 3 and 4 by the expected in-service dates of November 2021 and November 2022, respectively, is as follows:
 (in billions)
Base project capital cost forecast(a)(b)
$8.0
Construction contingency estimate0.4
Total project capital cost forecast(a)(b)
8.4
Net investment as of December 31, 2018(b)
(4.6)
Remaining estimate to complete(a)
$3.8
(a)Excludes financing costs expected to be capitalized through AFUDC of approximately $315 million.
(b)Net of $1.7 billion received from Toshiba under the Guarantee Settlement Agreement and approximately $188 million in related Customer Refunds.
Georgia Power estimates that its financing costs for construction of Plant Vogtle Units 3 and 4 will total approximately $3.1 billion, of which $1.9 billion had been incurred through December 31, 2018.
As construction continues, challenges with management of contractors, subcontractors, and vendors; labor productivity, availability, and/or cost escalation; procurement, fabrication, delivery, assembly, and/or installation and testing, including any

MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS (continued)
Southern Company and Subsidiary Companies 2018 Annual Report


required engineering changes, of plant systems, structures, and components (some of which are based on new technology that only recently began initial operation in the global nuclear industry at this scale); or other issues could arise and change the projected schedule and estimated cost. Monthly construction production targets required to maintain the current project schedule will continue to increase significantly throughout 2019. To meet these increasing monthly targets, existing craft construction productivity must improve and additional craft laborers must be retained and deployed.
Georgia Power and Southern Nuclear believe it is a providerleading practice in connection with a construction project of productsthis size and servicescomplexity to periodically validate recent construction progress in comparison to the projected schedule and to verify and update quantities of commodities remaining to install, labor productivity, and forecasted staffing needs. This verification process, led by Southern Nuclear, was underway as of December 31, 2018 and is expected to be completed during the second quarter 2019. Georgia Power currently does not anticipate any material changes to the total estimated project capital cost forecast for Plant Vogtle Units 3 and 4 or the expected in-service dates of November 2021 and November 2022, respectively, resulting from this verification process. However, the ultimate impact on cost and schedule, if any, will not be known until the verification process is completed. Georgia Power is required to report the results and any project impacts to the Georgia PSC by May 15, 2019.
There have been technical and procedural challenges to the construction and licensing of Plant Vogtle Units 3 and 4 at the federal and state level and additional challenges may arise. Processes are in place that are designed to assure compliance with the requirements specified in the areasWestinghouse Design Control Document and the combined construction and operating licenses, including inspections by Southern Nuclear and the NRC that occur throughout construction. As a result of distributed generation, energy efficiency,such compliance processes, certain license amendment requests have been filed and utility infrastructure.approved or are pending before the NRC. Various design and other licensing-based compliance matters, including the timely resolution of ITAAC and the related approvals by the NRC, may arise, which may result in additional license amendments or require other resolution. If any license amendment requests or other licensing-based compliance issues are not resolved in a timely manner, there may be delays in the project schedule that could result in increased costs.
The ultimate outcome of these matters cannot be determined at this time. However, any extension of the project schedule is currently estimated to result in additional base capital costs of approximately $50 million per month, based on Georgia Power's ownership interests, and AFUDC of approximately $12 million per month. While Georgia Power is not precluded from seeking recovery of any future capital cost forecast increase, management will ultimately determine whether or not to seek recovery. Any further changes to the capital cost forecast that are not expected to be recoverable through regulated rates will be required to be charged to income and such charges could be material.
Joint Owner Contracts
In November 2017, the Vogtle Owners entered into an amendment to their joint ownership agreements for Plant Vogtle Units 3 and 4 to provide for, among other conditions, additional Vogtle Owner approval requirements. Effective August 31, 2018, the Vogtle Owners further amended the joint ownership agreements to clarify and provide procedures for certain provisions of the joint ownership agreements related to adverse events that require the vote of the holders of at least 90% of the ownership interests in Plant Vogtle Units 3 and 4 to continue construction (as amended, and together with the November 2017 amendment, the Vogtle Joint Ownership Agreements). The Vogtle Joint Ownership Agreements also confirm that the Vogtle Owners' sole recourse against Georgia Power or Southern Nuclear for any action or inaction in connection with their performance as agent for the Vogtle Owners is limited to removal of Georgia Power and/or Southern Nuclear as agent, except in cases of willful misconduct.
As a result of the increase in the total project capital cost forecast and Georgia Power's decision not to seek rate recovery of the increase in the base capital costs as described below, the holders of at least 90% of the ownership interests in Plant Vogtle Units 3 and 4 were required to vote to continue construction. On September 26, 2018, the Vogtle Owners unanimously voted to continue construction of Plant Vogtle Units 3 and 4.
Amendments to the Vogtle Joint Ownership Agreements
In connection with the vote to continue construction, Georgia Power entered into (i) the Vogtle Owner Term Sheet with the other Vogtle Owners and MEAG's wholly-owned subsidiaries MEAG SPVJ, MEAG Power SPVM, LLC (MEAG SPVM), and MEAG Power SPVP, LLC (MEAG SPVP) to take certain actions which partially mitigate potential financial exposure for the other Vogtle Owners, including additional amendments to the Vogtle Joint Ownership Agreements and the purchase of PTCs from the other Vogtle Owners, and (ii) the MEAG Term Sheet with MEAG and MEAG SPVJ to provide funding with respect to MEAG SPVJ's ownership interest in Plant Vogtle Units 3 and 4 (Project J) under certain circumstances. On January 14, 2019, Georgia Power, MEAG, and MEAG SPVJ entered into an agreement to implement the provisions of the MEAG Term Sheet (MEAG Funding Agreement). On February 18, 2019, Georgia Power, the other Vogtle Owners, and MEAG's wholly-owned subsidiaries MEAG SPVJ, MEAG SPVM, and MEAG SPVP entered into certain amendments to the Vogtle Joint Ownership Agreements to implement the provisions of the Vogtle Owner Term Sheet (Global Amendments).

MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS (continued)
Southern Company and Subsidiary Companies 2018 Annual Report


Pursuant to the Global Amendments, and consistent with the Vogtle Owner Term Sheet, the Vogtle Joint Ownership Agreements were modified as follows: (i) each Vogtle Owner must pay its proportionate share of qualifying construction costs for Plant Vogtle Units 3 and 4 based on its ownership percentage up to the estimated cost at completion (EAC) for Plant Vogtle Units 3 and 4 which formed the basis of Georgia Power's forecast of $8.4 billion in the nineteenth VCM plus $800 million; (ii) Georgia Power will be responsible for 55.7% of actual qualifying construction costs between $800 million and $1.6 billion over the EAC in the nineteenth VCM (resulting in $80 million of potential additional costs to Georgia Power), with the remaining Vogtle Owners responsible for 44.3% of such costs pro rata in accordance with their respective ownership interests; and (iii) Georgia Power will be responsible for 65.7% of qualifying construction costs between $1.6 billion and $2.1 billion over the EAC in the nineteenth VCM (resulting in a further $100 million of potential additional costs to Georgia Power), with the remaining Vogtle Owners responsible for 34.3% of such costs pro rata in accordance with their respective ownership interests.
If the EAC is revised and exceeds the EAC in the nineteenth VCM by more than $2.1 billion, each of the other Vogtle Owners will have a one-time option at the time the project budget forecast is so revised to tender a portion of its ownership interest to Georgia Power in exchange for Georgia Power's agreement to pay 100% of such Vogtle Owner's remaining share of total construction costs in excess of the EAC in the nineteenth VCM plus $2.1 billion. In this event, Georgia Power will have the option of cancelling the project in lieu of purchasing a portion of the ownership interest of any other Vogtle Owner. If Georgia Power accepts the offer to purchase a portion of another Vogtle Owner's ownership interest in Plant Vogtle Units 3 and 4, the ownership interest(s) to be conveyed from the tendering Vogtle Owner(s) to Georgia Power will be calculated based on the proportion of the cumulative amount of construction costs paid by each such tendering Vogtle Owner(s) and by Georgia Power as of the COD of Plant Vogtle Unit 4. For purposes of this calculation, payments made by Georgia Power on behalf of another Vogtle Owner in accordance with the second and third items described in the paragraph above will be treated as payments made by the applicable Vogtle Owner.
In the event the actual costs of construction at completion of a Unit are less than the EAC reflected in the nineteenth VCM report and such Unit is placed in service in accordance with the schedule projected in the nineteenth VCM report (i.e., Plant Vogtle Unit 3 is placed in service by November 2021 or Plant Vogtle Unit 4 is placed in service by November 2022), Georgia Power will be entitled to 60.7% of the cost savings with respect to the relevant Unit and the remaining Vogtle Owners will be entitled to 39.3% of such savings on a pro rata basis in accordance with their respective ownership interests.
For purposes of the foregoing provisions, qualifying construction costs will not include costs (i) resulting from force majeure events, including governmental actions or inactions (or significant delays associated with issuance of such actions) that affect the licensing, completion, start-up, operations, or financing of Plant Vogtle Units 3 and 4, administrative proceedings or litigation regarding ITAAC or other regulatory challenges to commencement of operation of Plant Vogtle Units 3 and 4, and changes in laws or regulations governing Plant Vogtle Units 3 and 4, (ii) legal fees and legal expenses incurred due to litigation with contractors or subcontractors that are not subsidiaries or affiliates of Southern Company, and (iii) additional costs caused by requests from the Vogtle Owners other than Georgia Power, except for the exercise of a right to vote granted under the Vogtle Joint Ownership Agreements, that increase costs by $100,000 or more.
Pursuant to the Global Amendments, and consistent with the Vogtle Owner Term Sheet, the provisions of the Vogtle Joint Ownership Agreements requiring that Vogtle Owners holding 90% of the ownership interests in Plant Vogtle Units 3 and 4 vote to continue construction following certain adverse events (Project Adverse Events) were modified. Pursuant to the Global Amendments, the holders of at least 90% of the ownership interests in Plant Vogtle Units 3 and 4 must vote to continue construction if certain Project Adverse Events occur, including: (i) the bankruptcy of Toshiba; (ii) the termination or rejection in bankruptcy of certain agreements, including the Vogtle Services Agreement, the Bechtel Agreement, or the agency agreement with Southern Nuclear; (iii) Georgia Power publicly announces its intention not to submit for rate recovery any portion of its investment in Plant Vogtle Units 3 and 4 or the Georgia PSC determines that any of Georgia Power's costs relating to the construction of Plant Vogtle Units 3 and 4 will not be recovered in retail rates, excluding any additional amounts paid by Georgia Power on behalf of the other Vogtle Owners pursuant to the Global Amendments described above and the first 6% of costs during any six-month VCM reporting period that are disallowed by the Georgia PSC for recovery, or for which Georgia Power elects not to seek cost recovery, through retail rates; and (iv) an incremental extension of one year or more over the most recently approved schedule. Under the Global Amendments, Georgia Power may cancel the project at any time in its sole discretion.
In addition, pursuant to the Vogtle Joint Ownership Agreements, the required approval of holders of ownership interests in Plant Vogtle Units 3 and 4 is at least (i) 90% for a change of the primary construction contractor and (ii) 67% for material amendments to the Vogtle Services Agreement or agreements with Southern Nuclear or the primary construction contractor, including the Bechtel Agreement.
The Global Amendments provide that if the holders of at least 90% of the ownership interests fail to vote in favor of continuing the project following any future Project Adverse Event, work on Plant Vogtle Units 3 and 4 will continue for a period of 30 days if

MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS (continued)
Southern Company and Subsidiary Companies 2018 Annual Report


the holders of more than 50% of the ownership interests vote in favor of continuing construction (Majority Voting Owners). In such a case, the Vogtle Owners (i) have agreed to negotiate in good faith towards the resumption of the project, (ii) if no agreement is reached during such 30-day period, the project will be cancelled, and (iii) in the event of such a cancellation, the Majority Voting Owners will be obligated to reimburse any other Vogtle Owner for the incremental costs it incurred during such 30-day negotiation period.
Purchase of PTCs During Commercial Operation
Pursuant to the Global Amendments, and consistent with the Vogtle Owner Term Sheet, Georgia Power has agreed to purchase additional PTCs from OPC, Dalton, MEAG SPVM, MEAG SPVP, and MEAG SPVJ (to the extent any MEAG SPVJ PTC rights remain after any purchases required under the MEAG Funding Agreement as described below) at varying purchase prices dependent upon the actual cost to complete construction of Plant Vogtle Units 3 and 4 as compared to the EAC reflected in the nineteenth VCM report. The purchases are at the option of the applicable Vogtle Owner.
Potential Funding to MEAG Project J
Pursuant to the MEAG Funding Agreement, and consistent with the MEAG Term Sheet, if MEAG SPVJ is unable to make its payments due under the Vogtle Joint Ownership Agreements solely as a result of the occurrence of one of the following situations that materially impedes access to capital markets for MEAG for Project J: (i) the conduct of JEA or the City of Jacksonville, such as JEA's legal challenges of its obligations under a PPA with MEAG (PPA-J), or (ii) PPA-J is declared void by a court of competent jurisdiction or rejected by JEA under the applicable provisions of the U.S. Bankruptcy Code (each of (i) and (ii), a JEA Default), at MEAG's request, Georgia Power will purchase from MEAG SPVJ the rights to PTCs attributable to MEAG SPVJ's share of Plant Vogtle Units 3 and 4 (approximately 206 MWs) within 30 days of such request at varying prices dependent upon the stage of construction of Plant Vogtle Units 3 and 4. The aggregate purchase price of the PTCs, together with any advances made as described in the next paragraph, shall not exceed $300 million.
At the option of MEAG, as an alternative or supplement to Georgia Power's purchase of PTCs as described above, Georgia Power has agreed to provide up to $250 million in funding to MEAG for Project J in the form of advances (either advances under the Vogtle Joint Ownership Agreements or the purchase of MEAG Project J bonds, at the discretion of Georgia Power), subject to any required approvals of the Georgia PSC and the DOE.
In the event MEAG SPVJ certifies to Georgia Power that it is unable to fund its obligations under the Vogtle Joint Ownership Agreements as a result of a JEA Default and Georgia Power becomes obligated to provide funding as described above, MEAG is required to (i) assign to Georgia Power its right to vote on any future Project Adverse Event and (ii) diligently pursue JEA for its breach of PPA-J. In addition, Georgia Power agreed that it will not sue MEAG for any amounts due from MEAG SPVJ under MEAG's guarantee of MEAG SPVJ's obligations so long as MEAG SPVJ complies with the terms of the MEAG Funding Agreement as to its payment obligations and the other non-payment provisions of the Vogtle Joint Ownership Agreements.
Under the terms of the MEAG Funding Agreement, Georgia Power may cancel the project in lieu of providing funding in the form of advances or PTC purchases.
The ultimate outcome of these matters cannot be determined at this time.
Regulatory Matters
In 2009, the Georgia PSC voted to certify construction of Plant Vogtle Units 3 and 4 with a certified capital cost of $4.418 billion. In addition, in 2009 the Georgia PSC approved inclusion of the Plant Vogtle Units 3 and 4 related CWIP accounts in rate base, and the State of Georgia enacted the Georgia Nuclear Energy Financing Act, which allows Georgia Power to recover financing costs for Plant Vogtle Units 3 and 4. Financing costs are recovered on all applicable certified costs through annual adjustments to the NCCR tariff up to the certified capital cost of $4.418 billion. At December 31, 2018, Georgia Power had recovered approximately $1.9 billion of financing costs. Financing costs related to capital costs above $4.418 billion will be recovered through AFUDC; however, Georgia Power will not record AFUDC related to any capital costs in excess of the total deemed reasonable by the Georgia PSC (currently $7.3 billion) and not requested for rate recovery. On December 18, 2018, the Georgia PSC approved Georgia Power's request to increase the NCCR tariff by $88 million annually, effective January 1, 2019.
Georgia Power is required to file semi-annual VCM reports with the Georgia PSC by February 28 and August 31 of each year. In 2013, in connection with the eighth VCM report, the Georgia PSC approved a stipulation between Georgia Power and the staff of the Georgia PSC to waive the requirement to amend the Plant Vogtle Units 3 and 4 certificate in accordance with the 2009 certification order until the completion of Plant Vogtle Unit 3, or earlier if deemed appropriate by the Georgia PSC and Georgia Power.

MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS (continued)
Southern Company and Subsidiary Companies 2018 Annual Report


In 2016, the Georgia PSC voted to approve a settlement agreement (Vogtle Cost Settlement Agreement) resolving certain prudency matters in connection with the fifteenth VCM report. In December 2017, the Georgia PSC voted to approve (and issued its related order on January 11, 2018) Georgia Power's seventeenth VCM report, which included a recommendation to continue construction with Southern Nuclear as project manager and Bechtel serving as the primary construction contractor, and modified the Vogtle Cost Settlement Agreement. The Vogtle Cost Settlement Agreement, as modified by the January 11, 2018 order, resolved the following regulatory matters related to Plant Vogtle Units 3 and 4: (i) none of the $3.3 billion of costs incurred through December 31, 2015 and reflected in the fourteenth VCM report should be disallowed from rate base on the basis of imprudence; (ii) the Contractor Settlement Agreement was reasonable and prudent and none of the amounts paid pursuant to the Contractor Settlement Agreement should be disallowed from rate base on the basis of imprudence; (iii) (a) capital costs incurred up to $5.68 billion would be presumed to be reasonable and prudent with the burden of proof on any party challenging such costs, (b) Georgia Power would have the burden to show that any capital costs above $5.68 billion were prudent, and (c) a revised capital cost forecast of $7.3 billion (after reflecting the impact of payments received under the Guarantee Settlement Agreement and related Customer Refunds) was found reasonable; (iv) construction of Plant Vogtle Units 3 and 4 should be completed, with Southern Nuclear serving as project manager and Bechtel as primary contractor; (v) approved and deemed reasonable Georgia Power's revised schedule placing Plant Vogtle Units 3 and 4 in service in November 2021 and November 2022, respectively; (vi) confirmed that the revised cost forecast does not represent a cost cap and that prudence decisions on cost recovery will be made at a later date, consistent with applicable Georgia law; (vii) reduced the ROE used to calculate the NCCR tariff (a) from 10.95% (the ROE rate setting point authorized by the Georgia PSC in the 2013 ARP) to 10.00% effective January 1, 2016, (b) from 10.00% to 8.30%, effective January 1, 2020, and (c) from 8.30% to 5.30%, effective January 1, 2021 (provided that the ROE in no case will be less than Georgia Power's average cost of long-term debt); (viii) reduced the ROE used for AFUDC equity for Plant Vogtle Units 3 and 4 from 10.00% to Georgia Power's average cost of long-term debt, effective January 1, 2018; and (ix) agreed that upon Unit 3 reaching commercial operation, retail base rates would be adjusted to include carrying costs on those capital costs deemed prudent in the Vogtle Cost Settlement Agreement. The January 11, 2018 order also stated that if Plant Vogtle Units 3 and 4 are not commercially operational by June 1, 2021 and June 1, 2022, respectively, the ROE used to calculate the NCCR tariff will be further reduced by 10 basis points each month (but not lower than Georgia Power's average cost of long-term debt) until the respective Unit is commercially operational. The ROE reductions negatively impacted earnings by approximately $100 million, $25 million, and $20 million in 2018, 2017, and 2016, respectively, and are estimated to have negative earnings impacts of approximately $75 million in 2019 and an aggregate of approximately $615 million from 2020 to 2022.
In its January 11, 2018 order, the Georgia PSC also stated if other conditions change and assumptions upon which Georgia Power's seventeenth VCM report are based do not materialize, the Georgia PSC reserved the right to reconsider the decision to continue construction.
On February 12, 2018, Georgia Interfaith Power & Light, Inc. (GIPL) and Partnership for Southern Equity, Inc. (PSE) filed a petition appealing the Georgia PSC's January 11, 2018 order with the Fulton County Superior Court. On March 8, 2018, Georgia Watch filed a similar appeal to the Fulton County Superior Court for judicial review of the Georgia PSC's decision and denial of Georgia Watch's motion for reconsideration. On December 21, 2018, the Fulton County Superior Court granted Georgia Power's motion to dismiss the two appeals. On January 9, 2019, GIPL, PSE, and Georgia Watch filed an appeal of this decision with the Georgia Court of Appeals. Georgia Power believes the appeal has no merit; however, an adverse outcome in the appeal combined with subsequent adverse action by the Georgia PSC could have a material impact on Southern Company's results of operations, financial condition, and liquidity.
In preparation for its nineteenth VCM filing, Georgia Power requested Southern Nuclear to perform a full cost reforecast for the project. This reforecast, performed prior to the nineteenth VCM filing, resulted in a $0.7 billion increase to the base capital cost forecast reported in the second quarter 2018. This base cost increase primarily resulted from changed assumptions related to the finalization of contract scopes and management responsibilities for Bechtel and over 60 subcontractors, labor productivity rates, and craft labor incentives, as well as the related levels of project management, oversight, and support, including field supervision and engineering support.
Although Georgia Power believes these incremental costs are reasonable and necessary to complete the project and the Georgia PSC's order in the seventeenth VCM proceeding specifically states that the construction of Plant Vogtle Units 3 and 4 is not subject to a cost cap, Georgia Power did not seek rate recovery for these cost increases included in the current base capital cost forecast (or any related financing costs) in the nineteenth VCM report. In connection with future VCM filings, Georgia Power may request the Georgia PSC to evaluate costs currently included in the construction contingency estimate for rate recovery as and when they are appropriately included in the base capital cost forecast. After considering the significant level of uncertainty that exists regarding the future recoverability of costs included in the construction contingency estimate since the ultimate outcome of these matters is subject to the outcome of future assessments by management, as well as Georgia PSC decisions in these future regulatory proceedings, Georgia Power recorded a total pre-tax charge to income of $1.1 billion ($0.8 billion after

MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS (continued)
Southern Company and Subsidiary Companies 2018 Annual Report


tax) in the second quarter 2018, which includes the total increase in the base capital cost forecast and construction contingency estimate.
On August 31, 2018, Georgia Power filed its nineteenth VCM report with the Georgia PSC, which requested approval of $578 million of construction capital costs incurred from January 1, 2018 through June 30, 2018. On February 19, 2019, the Georgia PSC approved the nineteenth VCM, but deferred approval of $51.6 million of expenditures related to Georgia Power's portion of an administrative claim filed in the Westinghouse bankruptcy proceedings. Through the nineteenth VCM, the Georgia PSC has approved total construction capital costs incurred through June 30, 2018 of $5.4 billion (before $1.7 billion of payments received under the Guarantee Settlement Agreement and approximately $188 million in related Customer Refunds). In addition, the staff of the Georgia PSC requested, and Georgia Power agreed, to file its twentieth VCM report concurrently with the twenty-first VCM report by August 31, 2019.
The ultimate outcome of these matters cannot be determined at this time.
DOE Financing
At December 31, 2018, Georgia Power had borrowed $2.6 billion related to Plant Vogtle Units 3 and 4 costs through the Loan Guarantee Agreement and a multi-advance credit facility among Georgia Power, the DOE, and the FFB, which provides for borrowings of up to $3.46 billion, subject to the satisfaction of certain conditions. In September 2017, the DOE issued a conditional commitment to Georgia Power for up to approximately $1.67 billion in additional guaranteed loans under the Loan Guarantee Agreement. In September 2018, the DOE extended the conditional commitment to March 31, 2019. Any further extension must be approved by the DOE. Final approval and issuance of these additional loan guarantees by the DOE cannot be assured and are subject to the negotiation of definitive agreements, completion of due diligence by the DOE, receipt of any necessary regulatory approvals, and satisfaction of other conditions. See Note 128 to the financial statements under "Southern"Long-term DebtDOE Loan Guarantee Borrowings" for additional information, including applicable covenants, events of default, mandatory prepayment events (including any decision not to continue construction of Plant Vogtle Units 3 and 4), and conditions to borrowing.
The ultimate outcome of these matters cannot be determined at this time.
Income Tax Matters
Federal Tax Reform Legislation
In December 2017, the Tax Reform Legislation was signed into law and became effective on January 1, 2018. The Tax Reform Legislation, among other things, reduced the federal corporate income tax rate to 21%, retained normalization provisions for public utility property and existing renewable energy incentives, and repealed the corporate alternative minimum tax. In addition, under the Tax Reform Legislation, NOLs generated after December 31, 2017 can no longer be carried back to previous tax years but can be carried forward indefinitely, with utilization limited to 80% of taxable income of the subsequent tax year. The projected reduction of the consolidated income tax liability resulting from the tax rate reduction also delays the expected utilization of existing tax credit carryforwards.
Following the enactment of the Tax Reform Legislation, the SEC staff issued Staff Accounting Bulletin 118 – "Income Tax Accounting Implications of the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act" (SAB 118), which provided for a measurement period of up to one year from the enactment date to complete accounting under GAAP for the tax effects of the legislation. Due to the complex and comprehensive nature of the enacted tax law changes and their application under GAAP, Southern Company Gasconsidered all amounts recorded in the financial statements as a result of the Tax Reform Legislation "provisional" as discussed in SAB 118 and subject to revision prior to filing its 2017 tax return in the fourth quarter 2018. Southern Company recognized tax benefits of $30 million and $264 million in 2018 and 2017, respectively, for a total net tax benefit of $294 million as a result of the Tax Reform Legislation. In addition, in total, Southern Company recorded a $417 million decrease in regulatory assets and a $6.2 billion increase in regulatory liabilities as a result of the Tax Reform Legislation and $16 million of stranded excess deferred tax balances in AOCI at December 31, 2017 were adjusted through retained earnings in 2018. As of December 31, 2018, Southern Company considered the measurement of impacts from the Tax Reform Legislation on deferred income tax assets and liabilities, primarily due to the impact of the reduction of the corporate income tax rate, to be complete.
However, the IRS continues to issue regulations that provide further interpretation and guidance on the law and each state's adoption of the provisions contained in the Tax Reform Legislation remains uncertain. In addition, the regulatory treatment of certain impacts of the Tax Reform Legislation is subject to the discretion of the FERC and each state's regulatory commission. The ultimate impact of these matters cannot be determined at this time. See Note 2 to the financial statements for additional information regarding the traditional electric operating companies' and the natural gas distribution utilities' rate filings, including

MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS (continued)
Southern Company and Subsidiary Companies 2018 Annual Report


amounts returned to customers during 2018, to reflect the impacts of the Tax Reform Legislation. Also see FINANCIAL CONDITION AND LIQUIDITYProposed"Credit Rating Risk" herein and Note 10 to the financial statements under "Current and Deferred Income Taxes" for additional information.
Bonus Depreciation
Under the Tax Reform Legislation, projects with binding contracts prior to September 28, 2017 and placed in service after September 27, 2017 remain eligible for bonus depreciation under the PATH Act. The PATH Act allowed for 50% bonus depreciation for 2015 through 2017, 40% bonus depreciation for 2018, and 30% bonus depreciation for 2019 and certain long-lived assets placed in service in 2020. Based on provisional estimates, bonus depreciation is expected to result in positive cash flows of approximately $300 million for the 2018 tax year and approximately $130 million for the 2019 tax year. The ultimate outcome of this matter cannot be determined at this time.
Tax Credits
The Tax Reform Legislation retained the renewable energy incentives that were included in the PATH Act. The PATH Act allows for 30% ITC for solar projects that commence construction by December 31, 2019; 26% ITC for solar projects that commence construction in 2020; 22% ITC for solar projects that commence construction in 2021; and a permanent 10% ITC for solar projects that commence construction on or after January 1, 2022. In addition, the PATH Act allows for 100% PTC for wind projects that commenced construction in 2016; 80% PTC for wind projects that commenced construction in 2017; 60% PTC for wind projects that commenced construction in 2018 and 40% PTC for wind projects that commence construction in 2019. Wind projects commencing construction after 2019 will not be entitled to any PTCs. Southern Company has received ITCs and PTCs in connection with investments in solar, wind, and biomass facilities primarily at Southern Power and Georgia Power. See Note 1 to the financial statements under "Income Taxes" and Note 10 to the financial statements under "Current and Deferred Income TaxesTax Credit Carryforwards" for additional information regarding the utilization and amortization of credits and the tax benefit related to basis differences.
Other Matters
Southern Company and its subsidiaries are involved in various other matters being litigated and regulatory matters that could affect future earnings. In addition, Southern Company and its subsidiaries are subject to certain claims and legal actions arising in the ordinary course of business. The business activities of Southern Company's subsidiaries are subject to extensive governmental regulation related to public health and the environment, such as laws and regulations governing air, water, land, and protection of other natural resources. Litigation over environmental issues and claims of various types, including property damage, personal injury, common law nuisance, and citizen enforcement of environmental laws and regulations, has occurred throughout the U.S. This litigation has included claims for damages alleged to have been caused by CO2 and other emissions, CCR, and alleged exposure to hazardous materials, and/or requests for injunctive relief in connection with such matters.
The ultimate outcome of such pending or potential litigation or regulatory matters cannot be predicted at this time; however, for current proceedings not specifically reported herein or in Notes 2 and 3 to the financial statements, management does not anticipate that the ultimate liabilities, if any, arising from such current proceedings would have a material effect on Southern Company's financial statements. See Notes 2 and 3 to the financial statements for a discussion of various other contingencies, regulatory matters, and other matters being litigated which may affect future earnings potential.
Litigation
In January 2017, a putative securities class action complaint was filed against Southern Company, certain of its officers, and certain former Mississippi Power officers in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Georgia, Atlanta Division, by Monroe County Employees' Retirement System on behalf of all persons who purchased shares of Southern Company's common stock between April 25, 2012 and October 29, 2013. The complaint alleges that Southern Company, certain of its officers, and certain former Mississippi Power officers made materially false and misleading statements regarding the Kemper County energy facility in violation of certain provisions under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. The complaint seeks, among other things, compensatory damages and litigation costs and attorneys' fees. In June 2017, the plaintiffs filed an amended complaint that provided additional detail about their claims, increased the purported class period by one day, and added certain other former Mississippi Power officers as defendants. In July 2017, the defendants filed a motion to dismiss the plaintiffs' amended complaint with prejudice, to which the plaintiffs filed an opposition in September 2017. On March 29, 2018, the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Georgia, Atlanta Division, issued an order granting, in part, the defendants' motion to dismiss. The court dismissed certain claims against certain officers of Southern Company and Mississippi Power and dismissed the allegations related to a number of the statements that plaintiffs challenged as being false or misleading. On April 26, 2018, the

MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS (continued)
Southern Company and Subsidiary Companies 2018 Annual Report


defendants filed a motion for reconsideration of the court's order, seeking dismissal of the remaining claims in the lawsuit. On August 10, 2018, the court denied the motion for reconsideration and denied a motion to certify the issue for interlocutory appeal.
In February 2017, Jean Vineyard filed a shareholder derivative lawsuit and, in May 2017, Judy Mesirov filed a shareholder derivative lawsuit, each in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Georgia. Each of these lawsuits names as defendants Southern Company, certain of its directors, certain of its officers, and certain former Mississippi Power officers. In August 2017, these two shareholder derivative lawsuits were consolidated in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Georgia. The complaints allege that the defendants caused Southern Company to make false or misleading statements regarding the Kemper County energy facility cost and schedule. Further, the complaints allege that the defendants were unjustly enriched and caused the waste of corporate assets and also allege that the individual defendants violated their fiduciary duties. Each plaintiff seeks to recover, on behalf of Southern Company, unspecified actual damages and, on each plaintiff's own behalf, attorneys' fees and costs in bringing the lawsuit. Each plaintiff also seeks certain changes to Southern Company's corporate governance and internal processes. On April 25, 2018, the court entered an order staying this lawsuit until 30 days after the resolution of any dispositive motions or any settlement, whichever is earlier, in the putative securities class action.
In May 2017, Helen E. Piper Survivor's Trust filed a shareholder derivative lawsuit in the Superior Court of Gwinnett County, State of Georgia that names as defendants Southern Company, certain of its directors, certain of its officers, and certain former Mississippi Power officers. The complaint alleges that the individual defendants, among other things, breached their fiduciary duties in connection with schedule delays and cost overruns associated with the construction of the Kemper County energy facility. The complaint further alleges that the individual defendants authorized or failed to correct false and misleading statements regarding the Kemper County energy facility schedule and cost and failed to implement necessary internal controls to prevent harm to Southern Company. The plaintiff seeks to recover, on behalf of Southern Company, unspecified actual damages and disgorgement of profits and, on its behalf, attorneys' fees and costs in bringing the lawsuit. The plaintiff also seeks certain unspecified changes to Southern Company's corporate governance and internal processes. On May 4, 2018, the court entered an order staying this lawsuit until 30 days after the resolution of any dispositive motions or any settlement, whichever is earlier, in the putative securities class action.
On May 18, 2018, Southern Company and Mississippi Power received a notice of dispute and arbitration demand filed by Martin Product Sales, LLC (Martin) based on two agreements, both related to Kemper IGCC byproducts for which Mississippi Power provided termination notices in September 2017. Martin alleges breach of contract, breach of good faith and fair dealing, fraud and misrepresentation, and civil conspiracy and makes a claim for damages in the amount of approximately $143 million, as well as additional unspecified damages, attorney's fees, costs, and interest. In the first quarter 2019, Mississippi Power and Southern Company filed motions to dismiss.
Southern Company believes these legal challenges have no merit; however, an adverse outcome in any of these proceedings could have an impact on Southern Company's results of operations, financial condition, and liquidity. Southern Company will vigorously defend itself in these matters, the ultimate outcome of which cannot be determined at this time.
Investments in Leveraged Leases
A subsidiary of Southern Holdings has several leveraged lease agreements, with original terms ranging up to 45 years, which relate to international and domestic energy generation, distribution, and transportation assets. Southern Company receives federal income tax deductions for depreciation and amortization, as well as interest on long-term debt related to these investments. Southern Company reviews all important lease assumptions at least annually, or more frequently if events or changes in circumstances indicate that a change in assumptions has occurred or may occur. These assumptions include the effective tax rate, the residual value, the credit quality of the lessees, and the timing of expected tax cash flows. See Note 1 to the financial statements under "Leveraged Leases" for additional information.
The ability of the lessees to make required payments to the Southern Holdings subsidiary is dependent on the operational performance of the assets. In 2017, the financial and operational performance of one of the lessees and the associated generation assets raised significant concerns about the short-term ability of the generation assets to produce cash flows sufficient to support ongoing operations and the lessee's contractual obligations and its ability to make the remaining semi-annual lease payments to the Southern Holdings subsidiary beginning in June 2018. As a result of operational improvements in 2018, the 2018 lease payments were paid in full. However, operational issues and the resulting cash liquidity challenges persist and significant concerns continue regarding the lessee's ability to make the remaining semi-annual lease payments. These operational challenges may also impact the expected residual value of the assets at the end of the lease term in 2047. If any future lease payment is not paid in full, the Southern Holdings subsidiary may be unable to make its corresponding payment to the holders of the underlying non-recourse debt related to the generation assets. Failure to make the required payment to the debtholders could represent an event of default that would give the debtholders the right to foreclose on, and take ownership of, the generation assets from the

MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS (continued)
Southern Company and Subsidiary Companies 2018 Annual Report


Southern Holdings subsidiary, in effect terminating the lease and resulting in the write-off of the related lease receivable, which would result in a reduction in net income of approximately $86 million after tax based on the lease receivable balance at December 31, 2018. Southern Company has evaluated the recoverability of the lease receivable and the expected residual value of the generation assets at the end of the lease under various scenarios and has concluded that its investment in the leveraged lease is not impaired at December 31, 2018. Southern Company will continue to monitor the operational performance of the underlying assets and evaluate the ability of the lessee to continue to make the required lease payments. The ultimate outcome of this matter cannot be determined at this time.
Mississippi Power
In conjunction with Southern Company's sale of Gulf Power, Mississippi Power and Gulf Power have committed to seek a restructuring of their 50% undivided ownership interests in Plant Daniel such that each of them would, after the restructuring, own 100% of a generating unit. On January 15, 2019, Gulf Power provided notice to Mississippi Power that Gulf Power will retire its share of the generating capacity of Plant Daniel on January 15, 2024. Mississippi Power has the option to purchase Gulf Power's ownership interest for $1 on January 15, 2024, provided that Mississippi Power exercises the option no later than 120 days prior to that date. Mississippi Power is assessing the potential operational and economic effects of Gulf Power's notice. The ultimate outcome of these matters remains subject to completion of Mississippi Power's evaluations and applicable regulatory approvals, including the FERC and the Mississippi PSC, and cannot now be determined. See Note 15 to the financial statements under "Southern Company's Sale of Elizabethtown Gas and Elkton Gas"Gulf Power" for information regarding agreements enteredthe sale of Gulf Power.
Southern Power
On January 29, 2019, Pacific Gas & Electric Company (PG&E) filed petitions to reorganize under Chapter 11 of the U.S. Bankruptcy Code. Southern Power, together with its noncontrolling partners, owns four solar facilities where PG&E is the energy off-taker for approximately 207 MWs of capacity under long-term PPAs. PG&E is also the transmission provider for these facilities and two of Southern Power's other solar facilities. Southern Power has evaluated the recoverability of its investments in these solar facilities under various scenarios, including selling the related energy into bythe competitive markets, and has concluded they are not impaired. At December 31, 2018, Southern Power had outstanding accounts receivables due from PG&E of $1 million related to the PPAs and $36 million related to the transmission interconnections. Southern Company does not expect a material impact to its financial statements if, as a result of the bankruptcy proceedings, PG&E does not perform in accordance with the PPAs or the terms of the PPAs are renegotiated; however, the ultimate outcome of this matter cannot be determined at this time.
Southern Company Gas
A wholly-owned subsidiary of Southern Company Gas to sell two of itsowns and operates a natural gas distribution utilities.
The financial statements reflect Southern Company's investmentsstorage facility consisting of two salt dome caverns in Louisiana. Periodic integrity tests are required in accordance with rules of the subsidiaries on a consolidated basis. The equity method is used for entitiesLouisiana Department of Natural Resources (DNR). In August 2017, in whichconnection with an ongoing integrity project, updated seismic mapping indicated the Company has significant influence but does not controlproximity of one of the caverns to the edge of the salt dome may be less than the required minimum and for variable interest entities where the Company has an equity investment but is not the primary beneficiary. Intercompany transactions have been eliminatedcould result in consolidation.
The traditional electric operating companies, Southern Power, certain subsidiaries of Southern Company Gas retiring the cavern early. At December 31, 2018, the facility's property, plant, and equipment had a net book value of $109 million, of which the cavern itself represents approximately 20%. A potential early retirement of this cavern is dependent upon several factors including compliance with an order from the Louisiana DNR detailing the requirements to place the cavern back in service, which includes, among other things, obtaining core samples to determine the composition of the sheath surrounding the edge of the salt dome.
The cavern continues to maintain its pressures and overall structural integrity. Southern Company Gas intends to monitor the cavern and comply with the Louisiana DNR order through 2020 and place the cavern back in service in 2021. These events were considered in connection with Southern Company Gas' annual long-lived asset impairment analysis, which determined there was no impairment as of December 31, 2018. Any changes in results of monitoring activities, rates at which expiring capacity contracts are re-contracted, timing of placing the cavern back in service, or Louisiana DNR requirements could trigger impairment. Further, early retirement of the cavern could trigger impairment of other long-lived assets associated with the natural gas storage facility. The ultimate outcome of this matter cannot be determined at this time, but could have a significant impact on Southern Company's financial statements.
ACCOUNTING POLICIES
Application of Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates
Southern Company prepares its consolidated financial statements in accordance with GAAP. Significant accounting policies are described in Notes 1, 5, and 6 to the financial statements. In the application of these policies, certain other subsidiariesestimates are subjectmade that may

MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS (continued)
Southern Company and Subsidiary Companies 2018 Annual Report


have a material impact on Southern Company's results of operations and related disclosures. Different assumptions and measurements could produce estimates that are significantly different from those recorded in the FERC,financial statements. Senior management has reviewed and discussed the following critical accounting policies and estimates with the Audit Committee of Southern Company's Board of Directors.
Utility Regulation
Southern Company's traditional electric operating companies and natural gas distribution utilities, which collectively comprised approximately 85% of Southern Company's total operating revenues for 2018, are also subject to retail regulation by their respective state PSCs or other applicable state regulatory agencies.agencies and wholesale regulation by the FERC. These regulatory agencies set the rates the traditional electric operating companies and the natural gas distribution utilities are permitted to charge customers based on allowable costs, including a reasonable ROE. As such,a result, the consolidatedtraditional electric operating companies and the natural gas distribution utilities apply accounting standards which require the financial statements to reflect the effects of rate regulationregulation. Through the ratemaking process, the regulators may require the inclusion of costs or revenues in accordance with GAAPperiods different than when they would be recognized by a non-regulated company. This treatment may result in the deferral of expenses and comply withthe recording of related regulatory assets based on anticipated future recovery through rates or the deferral of gains or creation of liabilities and the recording of related regulatory liabilities. The application of the accounting policies and practices prescribed by relevant state PSCs or other applicable state regulatory agencies. The preparation ofstandards has a further effect on Southern Company's financial statements as a result of the estimates of allowable costs used in conformity with GAAP requires the use ofratemaking process. These estimates and the actual results may differ from those estimates. Certain prior years' data presentedactually incurred by the traditional electric operating companies and the natural gas distribution utilities; therefore, the accounting estimates inherent in the financial statementsspecific costs such as depreciation, AROs, and pension and other postretirement benefits have been reclassified to conform to the current year presentation. These reclassifications had noless of a direct impact on Southern Company's results of operations and financial position,condition than they would on a non-regulated company. See Note 15 to the financial statements for information regarding the sale of Gulf Power and three of Southern Company Gas' natural gas distribution utilities.
As reflected in Note 2 to the financial statements under "Southern CompanyRegulatory Assets and Liabilities," significant regulatory assets and liabilities have been recorded. Management reviews the ultimate recoverability of these regulatory assets and any requirement to refund these regulatory liabilities based on applicable regulatory guidelines and GAAP. However, adverse legislative, judicial, or cash flows.regulatory actions could materially impact the amounts of such regulatory assets and liabilities and could adversely impact Southern Company's financial statements.
Estimated Cost, Schedule, and Rate Recovery for the Construction of Plant Vogtle Units 3 and 4
In 2016, the Georgia PSC approved the Vogtle Cost Settlement Agreement, which resolved certain prudency matters in connection with Georgia Power's fifteenth VCM report. In December 2017, the Georgia PSC approved Georgia Power's seventeenth VCM report, which included a recommendation to continue construction of Plant Vogtle Units 3 and 4, with Southern Nuclear serving as project manager and Bechtel serving as the primary construction contractor, as well as a modification of the Vogtle Cost Settlement Agreement. The Georgia PSC's related order stated that under the modified Vogtle Cost Settlement Agreement, (i) none of the $3.3 billion of costs incurred through December 31, 2015 should be disallowed as imprudent; (ii) capital costs incurred up to $5.68 billion would be presumed to be reasonable and prudent with the burden of proof on any party challenging such costs; (iii) Georgia Power identified an error affectingwould have the billingburden of proof to show that any capital costs above $5.68 billion were prudent; (iv) Georgia Power's total project capital cost forecast of $7.3 billion (net of $1.7 billion received under the Guarantee Settlement Agreement and approximately $188 million in related Customer Refunds) was found reasonable and did not represent a small number of large commercialcost cap; and industrial customers under a rate plan allowing(v) prudence decisions would be made subsequent to achieving fuel load for variable demand-driven pricing from January 1, 2013Unit 4.
In its order, the Georgia PSC also stated if other conditions change and assumptions upon which Georgia Power's seventeenth VCM report are based do not materialize, the Georgia PSC reserved the right to June 30, 2015. reconsider the decision to continue construction.
In the second quarter 2015,2018, Georgia Power recorded an outrevised its base cost forecast and estimated contingency to complete construction and start-up of period adjustmentPlant Vogtle Units 3 and 4 to $8.0 billion and $0.4 billion, respectively, for a total project capital cost forecast of $8.4 billion (net of $1.7 billion received under the Guarantee Settlement Agreement and approximately $75$188 million to decrease retail revenues, resulting in a decrease to net income of approximately $47 million.related Customer Refunds). Although Georgia Power evaluatedbelieves these incremental costs are reasonable and necessary to complete the effectsproject and the Georgia PSC's order in the seventeenth VCM proceeding specifically states that the construction of this error on the interimPlant Vogtle Units 3 and annual periods that included the billing error. Based on an analysis of qualitative and quantitative factors,4 is not subject to a cost cap, Georgia Power determineddid not seek rate recovery for the error was not material$0.7 billion increase in costs included in the current base capital cost forecast in the nineteenth VCM report. In connection with future VCM filings, Georgia Power may request the Georgia PSC to any affected periodevaluate costs currently included in the construction contingency estimate for rate recovery as and therefore, an amendmentwhen they are appropriately included in the base capital cost forecast. After considering the significant level of previously filed financial statements was not required.
Recently Issued Accounting Standards
Revenue
In 2014, the FASB issued ASC 606, Revenue from Contracts with Customers (ASC 606), replacing the existing accounting standard and industry specific guidance for revenue recognition with a five-step model for recognizing and measuring revenue from contracts with customers. The underlying principle of the new standard is to recognize revenue to depict the transfer of goods or services to customers at the amount expected to be collected. The new standard also requires enhanced disclosuresuncertainty that exists regarding the nature, amount, timing, and uncertaintyfuture recoverability of revenue andcosts included in the related cash flows arising from contracts with customers.
Mostconstruction contingency estimate since the ultimate outcome of Southern Company's revenue, including energy providedthese matters is subject to customers, is from tariff offerings that provide electricity or natural gas without a defined contractual term,the outcome of future assessments by management, as well as longer-term contractual commitments, including PPAs and non-derivative natural gas asset management and optimization arrangements.
Southern Company has completed the evaluation of all revenue streams and determined that the adoption of ASC 606 will not change the current timing of revenue recognition for such transactions. Some revenue arrangements, such as certain PPAs, energy-related derivatives, and alternative revenue programs, are excluded from the scope of ASC 606 and, therefore, will beGeorgia PSC decisions in these future
    Table of Contents                                Index to Financial Statements

NOTESMANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS (continued)
Southern Company and Subsidiary Companies 20172018 Annual Report


accountedregulatory proceedings, Georgia Power recorded a total pre-tax charge to income of $1.1 billion ($0.8 billion after tax) in the second quarter 2018.
Georgia Power's revised cost estimate reflects an expected in-service date of November 2021 for Unit 3 and disclosed November 2022 for Unit 4.
As construction continues, challenges with management of contractors, subcontractors, and vendors; labor productivity, availability, and/or presented separatelycost escalation; procurement, fabrication, delivery, assembly, and/or installation and testing, including any required engineering changes, of plant systems, structures, and components (some of which are based on new technology that only recently began initial operation in the global nuclear industry at this scale); or other issues could arise and change the projected schedule and estimated cost. Monthly construction production targets required to maintain the current project schedule will continue to increase significantly throughout 2019. To meet these increasing monthly targets, existing craft construction productivity must improve and additional craft laborers must be retained and deployed.
Georgia Power and Southern Nuclear believe it is a leading practice in connection with a construction project of this size and complexity to periodically validate recent construction progress in comparison to the projected schedule and to verify and update quantities of commodities remaining to install, labor productivity, and forecasted staffing needs. This verification process, led by Southern Nuclear, was underway as of December 31, 2018 and is expected to be completed during the second quarter 2019. Georgia Power currently does not anticipate any material changes to the total estimated project capital cost forecast for Plant Vogtle Units 3 and 4 or the expected in-service dates of November 2021 and November 2022, respectively, resulting from revenuesthis verification process. However, the ultimate impact on cost and schedule, if any, will not be known until the verification process is completed. Georgia Power is required to report the results and any project impacts to the Georgia PSC by May 15, 2019.
There have been technical and procedural challenges to the construction and licensing of Plant Vogtle Units 3 and 4 at the federal and state level and additional challenges may arise. Processes are in place that are designed to assure compliance with the requirements specified in the Westinghouse Design Control Document and the combined construction and operating licenses, including inspections by Southern Nuclear and the NRC that occur throughout construction. As a result of such compliance processes, certain license amendment requests have been filed and approved or are pending before the NRC. Various design and other licensing-based compliance matters, including the timely resolution of ITAAC and the related approvals by the NRC, may arise, which may result in additional license amendments or require other resolution. If any license amendment requests or other licensing-based compliance issues are not resolved in a timely manner, there may be delays in the project schedule that could result in increased costs.
The ultimate outcome of these matters cannot be determined at this time. Any extension of the in-service dates of November 2021 for Unit 3 and November 2022 for Unit 4 is currently estimated to result in additional base capital costs of approximately $50 million per month, based on Georgia Power's ownership interests, and AFUDC of approximately $12 million per month. While Georgia Power is not precluded from seeking recovery of any future capital cost forecast increase, management will ultimately determine whether or not to seek recovery. Any further changes to the capital cost forecast that are not expected to be recoverable through regulated rates will be required to be charged to income and such charges could be material.
Given the significant complexity involved in estimating the future costs to complete construction and start-up of Plant Vogtle Units 3 and 4 and the significant management judgment necessary to assess the related uncertainties surrounding future rate recovery of any projected cost increases, as well as the potential impact on Southern Company's results of operations and cash flows, Southern Company considers these items to be critical accounting estimates. See Note 2 to the financial statements under ASC 606"Georgia PowerNuclear Construction" for additional information.
Accounting for Income Taxes
The consolidated income tax provision and deferred income tax assets and liabilities, as well as any unrecognized tax benefits and valuation allowances, require significant judgment and estimates. These estimates are supported by historical tax return data, reasonable projections of taxable income, and interpretations of applicable tax laws and regulations across multiple taxing jurisdictions. The effective tax rate reflects the statutory tax rates and calculated apportionments for the various states in which the Southern Company system operates.
Southern Company files a consolidated federal income tax return and various state income tax returns, some of which are combined or unitary. Under a joint consolidated income tax allocation agreement, each Southern Company subsidiary's current and deferred tax expense is computed on a stand-alone basis and no subsidiary is allocated more current expense than would be paid if it filed a separate income tax return. Certain deductions and credits can be limited at the consolidated or combined level resulting in NOL and tax credit carryforwards that would not otherwise result on a stand-alone basis. Utilization of NOL and tax credit carryforwards and the assessment of valuation allowances are based on significant judgment and extensive analysis of

MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS (continued)
Southern Company and Subsidiary Companies 2018 Annual Report


Southern Company's current financial position and result of operations, including currently available information about future years, to estimate when future taxable income will be realized.
Current and deferred state income tax liabilities and assets are estimated based on laws of multiple states that determine the income to be apportioned to their jurisdictions. States utilize various formulas to calculate the apportionment of taxable income, primarily using sales, assets, or payroll within the jurisdiction compared to the consolidated totals. In addition, each state varies as to whether a stand-alone, combined, or unitary filing methodology is required. The calculation of deferred state taxes considers apportionment factors and filing methodologies that are expected to apply in future years. The apportionments and methodologies which are ultimately finalized in a manner inconsistent with expectations could have a material effect on Southern Company's financial statements.
Given the significant judgment involved in estimating NOL and tax credit carryforwards and multi-state apportionments for all subsidiaries, Southern Company has concluded contributions in aid of construction are not in scope for ASC 606considers federal and will continuestate deferred income tax liabilities and assets to be accountedcritical accounting estimates.
Asset Retirement Obligations
AROs are computed as the fair value of the estimated costs for an asset's future retirement and are recorded in the period in which the liability is incurred. The estimated costs are capitalized as an offset to property, plant,part of the related long-lived asset and equipment.depreciated over the asset's useful life. In the absence of quoted market prices, AROs are estimated using present value techniques in which estimates of future cash outlays associated with the asset retirements are discounted using a credit-adjusted risk-free rate. Estimates of the timing and amounts of future cash outlays are based on projections of when and how the assets will be retired and the cost of future removal activities.
The new standard is effectiveliability for reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2017.AROs primarily relates to facilities that are subject to the CCR Rule and the related state rules, principally ash ponds, and the decommissioning of the Southern Company appliedsystem's nuclear facilities – Alabama Power's Plant Farley and Georgia Power's ownership interests in Plant Hatch and Plant Vogtle Units 1 and 2. In addition, the modified retrospectiveSouthern Company system has AROs related to various landfill sites, asbestos removal, mine reclamation, land restoration related to solar and wind facilities, and disposal of polychlorinated biphenyls in certain transformers.
The traditional electric operating companies and Southern Company Gas also have identified retirement obligations, such as obligations related to certain electric transmission and distribution facilities, certain asbestos containing material within long-term assets not subject to ongoing repair and maintenance activities, certain wireless communication towers, the disposal of polychlorinated biphenyls in certain transformers, leasehold improvements, equipment on customer property, and property associated with the Southern Company system's rail lines and natural gas pipelines. However, liabilities for the removal of these assets have not been recorded as the fair value of the retirement obligations cannot be reasonably estimated. A liability for these retirement obligations will be recognized when sufficient information becomes available to support a reasonable estimation of the retirement obligation.
The cost estimates for AROs related to the disposal of CCR are based on information using various assumptions related to closure and post-closure costs, timing of future cash outlays, inflation and discount rates, and the potential methods for complying with the CCR Rule. During 2018, Alabama Power and Georgia Power recorded increases of approximately $1.2 billion and $3.1 billion, respectively, to their AROs related to the disposal of CCR and increases of approximately $300 million and $130 million, respectively, to their AROs related to updated nuclear decommissioning cost site studies. Alabama Power's CCR-related update resulted from feasibility studies performed on ash ponds in use at the plants it operates, which indicated that additional closure costs, primarily related to increases in estimated ash volume, water management requirements, and design revisions, will be required to close these ash ponds under the planned closure-in-place methodology. Georgia Power's CCR-related update resulted from a strategic assessment which indicated additional closure costs will be required to close its ash ponds, primarily due to changes in closure strategies, the estimated amount of ash to be excavated, and additional water management requirements necessary to support closure strategies. The traditional electric operating companies expect to periodically update their ARO cost estimates. See FUTURE EARNINGS POTENTIAL – "Environmental MattersEnvironmental Laws and RegulationsCoal Combustion Residuals" herein and Note 6 to the financial statements for additional information.
Given the significant judgment involved in estimating AROs, Southern Company considers the liabilities for AROs to be critical accounting estimates.
Pension and Other Postretirement Benefits
Southern Company's calculation of pension and other postretirement benefits expense is dependent on a number of assumptions. These assumptions include discount rates, healthcare cost trend rates, expected long-term return on plan assets, mortality rates, expected salary and wage increases, and other factors. Components of pension and other postretirement benefits expense include

MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS (continued)
Southern Company and Subsidiary Companies 2018 Annual Report


interest and service cost on the pension and other postretirement benefit plans, expected return on plan assets, and amortization of certain unrecognized costs and obligations. Actual results that differ from the assumptions utilized are accumulated and amortized over future periods and, therefore, generally affect recognized expense and the recorded obligation in future periods. While Southern Company believes that the assumptions used are appropriate, differences in actual experience or significant changes in assumptions would affect its pension and other postretirement benefit costs and obligations.
Key elements in determining Southern Company's pension and other postretirement benefit expense are the expected long-term return on plan assets and the discount rate used to measure the benefit plan obligations and the periodic benefit plan expense for future periods. The expected long-term return on pension and other postretirement benefit plan assets is based on Southern Company's investment strategy, historical experience, and expectations for long-term rates of return that consider external actuarial advice. Southern Company determines the long-term return on plan assets by applying the long-term rate of expected returns on various asset classes to Southern Company's target asset allocation. For purposes of determining its liability related to the pension and other postretirement benefit plans, Southern Company discounts the future related cash flows using a single-point discount rate for each plan developed from the weighted average of market-observed yields for high quality fixed income securities with maturities that correspond to expected benefit payments.
The following table illustrates the sensitivity to changes in Southern Company's long-term assumptions with respect to the discount rate, salary increases, and the long-term rate of return on plan assets:
Change in AssumptionIncrease/(Decrease) in Total Benefit Expense for 2019Increase/(Decrease) in Projected Obligation for Pension Plan at December 31, 2018Increase/(Decrease) in Projected Obligation for Other Postretirement Benefit Plans at December 31, 2018
(in millions)
25 basis point change in discount rate$37/$(36)$434/$(411)$50/$(48)
25 basis point change in salaries$11/$(11)$105/$(101)$–/$–
25 basis point change in long-term return on plan assets$33/$(33)N/AN/A
N/A – Not applicable
See Note 11 to the financial statements for additional information regarding pension and other postretirement benefits.
Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets
The acquisition method of adoption effective January 1, 2018. Southern Company also utilized practical expedients which allowed itaccounting requires the assets acquired and liabilities assumed to apply the standard to open contractsbe recorded at the date of adoptionacquisition at their respective estimated fair values. Southern Company recognizes goodwill as of the acquisition date, as a residual over the fair values of the identifiable net assets acquired. Goodwill is tested for impairment on an annual basis in the fourth quarter of the year as well as on an interim basis as events and changes in circumstances occur. Primarily as a result of the acquisitions of Southern Company Gas and PowerSecure in 2016, goodwill totaled approximately $5.3 billion at December 31, 2018. As a result of the Southern Company Gas Dispositions, goodwill was reduced by $910 million during 2018. In addition, Southern Company Gas recorded a $42 million goodwill impairment charge in 2018 in contemplation of the sale of Pivotal Home Solutions.
Definite-lived intangible assets acquired are amortized over the estimated useful lives of the respective assets to reflect the aggregate effectpattern in which the economic benefits of all modifications when identifying performance obligationsthe intangible assets are consumed. Whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of the intangible assets may not be recoverable, the intangible assets will be reviewed for impairment. Primarily as a result of the acquisitions of Southern Company Gas and allocatingPowerSecure and PPA fair value adjustments resulting from Southern Power's acquisitions, other intangible assets, net of amortization totaled approximately $613 million at December 31, 2018.
The judgments made in determining the estimated fair value assigned to each class of assets acquired and liabilities assumed, as well as asset lives, can significantly impact Southern Company's results of operations. Fair values and useful lives are determined based on, among other factors, the expected future period of benefit of the asset, the various characteristics of the asset, and projected cash flows. As the determination of an asset's fair value and useful life involves management making certain estimates and because these estimates form the basis for the determination of whether or not an impairment charge should be recorded, Southern Company considers these estimates to be critical accounting estimates.
See Note 1 to the financial statements under "Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets and Liabilities" for additional information regarding Southern Company's goodwill and other intangible assets and Note 15 to the financial statements for additional

MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS (continued)
Southern Company and Subsidiary Companies 2018 Annual Report


information related to Southern Company's 2016 acquisitions of Southern Company Gas and PowerSecure, as well as the Southern Company Gas Dispositions.
Derivatives and Hedging Activities
Derivative instruments are recorded on the balance sheets as either assets or liabilities measured at their fair value, unless the transactions qualify for the normal purchases or normal sales scope exception and are instead subject to traditional accrual accounting. For those transactions that do not qualify as a normal purchase or normal sale, changes in the derivatives' fair values are recognized concurrently in earnings unless specific hedge accounting criteria are met. If the derivatives meet those criteria, derivative gains and losses offset related results of the hedged item in the income statement in the case of a fair value hedge, or gains and losses are deferred in OCI until the hedged transaction affects earnings in the case of a cash flow hedge. Certain subsidiaries of Southern Company enter into energy-related derivatives that are designated as regulatory hedges where gains and losses are initially recorded as regulatory liabilities and assets and then are included in fuel expense as the underlying fuel is used in operations and ultimately recovered through billings to customers.
Southern Company uses derivative instruments to reduce the impact to the results of operations due to the risk of changes in the price of natural gas, to manage fuel hedging programs per guidelines of state regulatory agencies, and to mitigate residual changes in the price of electricity, weather, interest rates, and foreign currency exchange rates. The fair value of commodity derivative instruments used to manage exposure to changing prices reflects the estimated amounts that Southern Company would receive or pay to terminate or close the contracts at the reporting date. To determine the fair value of the derivative instruments, Southern Company utilizes market data or assumptions that market participants would use in pricing the derivative asset or liability, including assumptions about risk and the risks inherent in the inputs of the valuation technique.
Southern Company classifies derivative assets and liabilities based on the lowest level of input that is significant to the fair value measurement. The assessment of the significance of a particular input to the fair value measurement requires judgment and may affect the valuation of fair value assets and liabilities and their placement within the fair value hierarchy. The determination of the fair value of the derivative instruments incorporates various required factors. These factors include:
the creditworthiness of the counterparties involved and the impact of credit enhancements (such as cash deposits and letters of credit);
events specific to a given counterparty; and
the impact of Southern Company's nonperformance risk on its liabilities.
Given the assumptions used in pricing the derivative asset or liability, Southern Company considers the valuation of derivative assets and liabilities a critical accounting estimate. See FINANCIAL CONDITION AND LIQUIDITY – "Market Price Risk" herein and Note 14 to the financial statements for contracts modified beforemore information.
Contingent Obligations
Southern Company is subject to a number of federal and state laws and regulations as well as other factors and conditions that subject it to environmental, litigation, and other risks. See FUTURE EARNINGS POTENTIAL herein and Notes 2 and 3 to the effective date. Underfinancial statements for more information regarding certain of these contingencies. Southern Company periodically evaluates its exposure to such risks and records reserves for those matters where a non-tax-related loss is considered probable and reasonably estimable. The adequacy of reserves can be significantly affected by external events or conditions that can be unpredictable; thus, the modified retrospective methodultimate outcome of adoption, prior year reportedsuch matters could materially affect Southern Company's results are not restated; however, a cumulative-effect adjustmentof operations, cash flows, or financial condition.
Recently Issued Accounting Standards
See Note 1 to retained earnings at January 1, 2018 is recorded. In addition, quarterly disclosures will include comparative information on 2018the financial statement line itemsstatements under current guidance. The adoption of ASC 606 did not result in a cumulative-effect adjustment.
Leases"Recently Adopted Accounting Standards" for additional information.
In February 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-02, Leases (Topic 842) (ASU 2016-02). ASU 2016-02 requires lessees to recognize on the balance sheet a lease liability and a right-of-use asset for all leases. ASU 2016-02 also changes the recognition, measurement, and presentation of expense associated with leases and provides clarification regarding the identification of certain components of contracts that would represent a lease. The accounting required by lessors is relatively unchanged and there is no change to the accounting for existing leveraged leases. ASU 2016-02 is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2018 and Southern Company will adoptadopted the new standard effective January 1, 2019.
Southern Company is currently implementing an information technology system along withelected the related changes to internal controls and accounting policies that will supporttransition methodology provided by ASU No. 2018-11, Leases (Topic 842): Targeted Improvements, whereby the accounting for leases under ASU 2016-02. In addition, Southern Company has substantially completed a detailed inventory and analysis of its leases. In terms of rental charges and duration of contracts, the most significant leases relate to cellular towers and PPAs where certain of Southern Company's subsidiaries are the lessee and to land and outdoor lighting where certain of Southern Company's subsidiaries are the lessor. The traditional electric operating companies are currently analyzing pole attachment agreements, and a lease determination has not been made at this time. While Southern Company has not yet determined the ultimate impact, adoptionrequirements of ASU 2016-02 is expected to haveare applied on a significant impact on Southern Company's balance sheet.
Other
In March 2016,prospective basis as of the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-09, Compensation-Stock Compensation (Topic 718): Improvements to Employee Share-Based Payment Accounting (ASU 2016-09). ASU 2016-09 changes the accounting for income taxes and the cash flow presentation for share-based payment award transactions effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2016. The new guidance requires all excess tax benefits and deficiencies related to the exercise or vestingadoption date of stock compensation to be recognized as income tax expense or benefit in the income statement. Previously, Southern Company recognized any excess tax benefits and deficiencies related to the exercise and vesting of stock compensation as additional paid-in capital. In addition, the new guidance requires excess tax benefits for share-based payments to be included in net cash provided from operating activities rather than net cash provided from financing activities on the statement of cash flows.January 1, 2019, without restating prior periods. Southern Company elected to adopt the guidance in 2016 and reflect the related adjustments aspackage of January 1, 2016. Prior year's data presented in the financial statements has not been adjusted. Southern Company also elected to recognize forfeitures as they occur. The new guidance did not have a material impact on the results of operations, financial position, or cash flows of Southern Company. See Notes 5 and 8 for disclosures impactedpractical expedients provided by ASU 2016-09.
In November 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-18, Statement of Cash Flows (Topic 230): Restricted Cash (ASU 2016-18). ASU 2016-18 eliminates the need to reflect transfers between cash and restricted cash in operating, investing, and financing activities in the statement of cash flows. Upon adoption, the net change in cash and cash equivalents during the period will include amounts generally described as restricted cash or restricted cash equivalents. ASU 2016-18 is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2017, and will be applied retrospectively to each period presented. Southern Company adopted ASU 2016-18 effective January 1, 2018 with no material impact on its financial statements.
On January 26, 2017, the FASB issued ASU No. 2017-04, Intangibles – Goodwill and Other (Topic 350): Simplifying the Test for Goodwill Impairment (ASU 2017-04). ASU 2017-04 removes the requirement to compare the implied fair value of goodwill with the carrying amount as part of Step 2 of the goodwill impairment test. Under the new standard, the goodwill impairment loss will be measured as the excess of a reporting unit's carrying amount over its fair value, not exceeding the total amount of goodwill allocated to that reporting unit, which may increase the frequency of goodwill impairment charges if a future goodwill impairment test does not pass the Step 1 evaluation. ASU 2017-04 is effective prospectively for periods beginning on or after2016-02
    Table of Contents                                Index to Financial Statements

NOTESMANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS (continued)
Southern Company and Subsidiary Companies 20172018 Annual Report


December 15, 2019, with early adoption permitted.that allows prior determinations of whether existing contracts are, or contain, leases and the classification of existing leases to continue without reassessment. Additionally, Southern Company adoptedapplied the use-of-hindsight practical expedient in determining lease terms as of the date of adoption and elected the practical expedient that allows existing land easements not previously accounted for as leases not to be reassessed. Southern Company also made accounting policy elections to account for short-term leases in all asset classes as off-balance sheet leases and combined lease and non-lease components in the computations of lease obligations and right-of-use assets for most asset classes.
The Southern Company system completed the implementation of a new application to track and account for its leases and updated its internal controls and accounting policies to support the accounting for leases under ASU 2017-04 effective January 1, 20182016-02. The Southern Company system completed its lease inventory and determined its most significant leases involve PPAs, real estate, and communication towers where certain of Southern Company's subsidiaries are the lessee and PPAs where certain of Southern Company's subsidiaries are the lessor. In the first quarter 2019, the adoption of ASU 2016-02 resulted in recording lease liabilities and right-of-use assets on Southern Company's balance sheet each totaling approximately $2.0 billion, with no impact on itsSouthern Company's statement of income.
FINANCIAL CONDITION AND LIQUIDITY
Overview
Earnings in all periods presented were negatively affected by charges associated with plants under construction; however, Southern Company's financial statements.condition remained stable at December 31, 2018.
On March 10, 2017, the FASB issued ASU No. 2017-07, Compensation – Retirement Benefits (Topic 715): Improving the PresentationThe Southern Company system's cash requirements primarily consist of Net Periodic Pension Costfunding ongoing operations, common stock dividends, capital expenditures, and Net Periodic Postretirement Benefit Cost (ASU 2017-07). ASU 2017-07 requires that an employer report the service cost component in the same line item or items asdebt maturities. The Southern Company system's capital expenditures and other compensation costsinvesting activities include investments to meet projected long-term demand requirements, including to build new electric generation facilities, to maintain existing electric generation facilities, to comply with environmental regulations including adding environmental modifications to certain existing electric generating units and requires the other componentsclosures of net periodic pensionash ponds, to expand and postretirement benefit costsimprove electric transmission and distribution facilities, to be separately presented in the income statement outside of income from operations. Additionally, only the service cost component is eligibleupdate and expand natural gas distribution systems, and for capitalization, when applicable. However, all cost components remain eligible for capitalization under FERC regulations. ASU 2017-07 will be applied retrospectively for the presentationrestoration following major storms. Operating cash flows provide a substantial portion of the service cost component andSouthern Company system's cash needs. For the other components of net periodic pension and postretirement benefit costs in the income statement. The capitalization of only the service cost component of net periodic pension and postretirement benefit costs in assets will be applied on a prospective basis. ASU 2017-07 is effective for periods beginning after December 15, 2017. The presentation changes required for net periodic pension and postretirement benefit costs will result in a decrease inthree-year period from 2019 through 2021, Southern Company's operating incomeprojected common stock dividends, capital expenditures, and an increase in other income for 2016 and 2017 anddebt maturities are expected to resultexceed operating cash flows. Southern Company plans to finance future cash needs in a decreaseexcess of its operating cash flows primarily by accessing borrowings from financial institutions and through debt and equity issuances in the capital markets. Southern Company intends to continue to monitor its access to short-term and long-term capital markets as well as bank credit arrangements to meet future capital and liquidity needs. See "Sources of Capital," "Financing Activities," and "Capital Requirements and Contractual Obligations" herein for additional information.
Southern Company's investments in the qualified pension plans and the nuclear decommissioning trust funds decreased in value at December 31, 2018 as compared to December 31, 2017. No contributions to the qualified pension plan were made for the year ended December 31, 2018 and no mandatory contributions to the qualified pension plans are anticipated during 2019. See "Contractual Obligations" herein and Notes 6 and 11 to the financial statements under "Nuclear Decommissioning" and "Pension Plans," respectively, for additional information.
Net cash provided from operating activities in 2018 totaled $6.9 billion, an increase of $0.6 billion from 2017. The increase in net cash provided from operating activities was primarily due to the timing of vendor payments and increased fuel cost recovery. Net cash provided from operating activities in 2017 totaled $6.4 billion, an increase of $1.5 billion from 2016. Significant changes in operating income and an increase in other incomecash flow for 2018.2017 as compared to 2016 included increases of $1.2 billion related to operating activities of Southern Company adopted ASU 2017-07 effective JanuaryGas, which was acquired on July 1, 2016, and $1.0 billion related to voluntary contributions to the qualified pension plan in 2016, partially offset by the timing of vendor payments.
Net cash used for investing activities in 2018, with no material impact on its financial statements.
On August 28, 2017, the FASB issued ASU No. 2017-12, Derivatives and Hedging (Topic 815): Targeted Improvements2016 totaled $5.8 billion, $7.2 billion, and $20.0 billion, respectively. The cash used for investing activities in 2018 was primarily due to Accounting for Hedging Activities (ASU 2017-12), amending the hedge accounting recognition and presentation requirements. ASU 2017-12 makes more financial and non-financial hedging strategies eligible for hedge accounting, amends the related presentation and disclosure requirements, and simplifies hedge effectiveness assessment requirements. ASU 2017-12 is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2018, with early adoption permitted. Southern Company adopted ASU 2017-12 effective January 1, 2018 with no material impact on its financial statements.
Regulatory Assets and Liabilities
The traditional electric operating companiescompanies' installation of equipment to comply with environmental standards and natural gasconstruction of electric generation, transmission, and distribution utilities are subjectfacilities and capital expenditures for Southern Company Gas' infrastructure replacement programs, partially offset by proceeds from the sale transactions described in Note 15 to accounting requirementsthe financial statements. The cash used for investing activities in 2017 was primarily due to the effectstraditional electric operating companies' installation of rate regulation. Regulatory assets represent probable future revenues associatedequipment to comply with certain costs that are expectedenvironmental standards and construction of electric generation, transmission, and distribution facilities, capital expenditures for Southern Company Gas' infrastructure replacement programs, and Southern Power's renewable acquisitions. The cash used for investing activities in 2016 was primarily due to be recovered from customers through the ratemaking process. Regulatory liabilities represent probable future reductionsclosing of the Merger, the acquisition of PowerSecure, Southern Company Gas' investment in revenues associated with amounts that are expected to be credited to customers throughSNG, the ratemaking process.traditional electric operating companies' construction of electric generation, transmission, and distribution facilities and
    Table of Contents                                Index to Financial Statements

NOTESMANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS (continued)
Southern Company and Subsidiary Companies 20172018 Annual Report


Regulatoryinstallation of equipment at electric generating facilities to comply with environmental standards, and Southern Power's acquisitions and construction of renewable facilities and a natural gas facility.
Net cash used for financing activities totaled $1.8 billion in 2018 primarily due to net redemptions and repurchases of long-term debt, common stock dividend payments, and a decrease in commercial paper borrowings, partially offset by net issuances of short-term bank debt, proceeds from Southern Power's sales of non-controlling equity interests in entities indirectly owning substantially all of its solar facilities and eight of its wind facilities, and the issuance of common stock. Net cash provided from financing activities totaled $1.0 billion in 2017 primarily due to net issuances of long-term and short-term debt, partially offset by common stock dividend payments. Net cash provided from financing activities totaled $15.7 billion in 2016 primarily due to issuances of long-term debt and common stock associated with completing the Merger and funding the subsidiaries' continuous construction programs, Southern Power's acquisitions, and Southern Company Gas' investment in SNG, partially offset by redemptions of long-term debt and common stock dividend payments. Fluctuations in cash flow from financing activities vary from year to year based on capital needs and the maturity or redemption of securities.
Significant balance sheet changes in 2018 included the reclassification of $5.7 billion and $3.3 billion in total assets and (liabilities) reflectedliabilities held for sale, respectively, primarily associated with Gulf Power, as well as decreases of $3.0 billion and $0.4 billion in total assets and liabilities, respectively, associated with the sales described in Note 15 to the financial statements under "Southern Power" and "Southern Company Gas." Also see Note 15 to the financial statements under "Southern Company's Sale of Gulf Power" and "Assets Held for Sale" for additional information. After adjusting for these changes, other significant balance sheetssheet changes included an increase of $7.1 billion in total property, plant, and equipment primarily related to the $4.7 billion increase in AROs at Alabama Power and Georgia Power, as well as the traditional electric operating companies' installation of equipment to comply with environmental standards and construction of electric generation, transmission, and distribution facilities and Southern Company Gas' capital expenditures for infrastructure replacement programs, partially offset by the second quarter 2018 charge related to the construction of Plant Vogtle Units 3 and 4; a decrease of $3.1 billion in long-term debt (including amounts due within one year) resulting from the repayment of long-term debt; an increase of $3.0 billion in noncontrolling interests at Southern Power as a result of sales of interests in entities indirectly owning substantially all of its solar facilities and eight of its wind facilities; and an increase of $1.9 billion in other regulatory assets, deferred primarily related to AROs at Georgia Power. See Notes 2 and 15 to the financial statements under "Georgia PowerNuclear Construction" and "Southern PowerSales of Renewable Facility Interests," respectively, as well as Notes 6 and 8 to the financial statements and "Financing Activities" herein for additional information.
At the end of 2018, the market price of Southern Company's common stock was $43.92 per share (based on the closing price as reported on the NYSE) and the book value was $23.91 per share, representing a market-to-book value ratio of 184%, compared to $48.09, $23.99, and 201%, respectively, at the end of 2017.
Southern Company's consolidated ratio of common equity to total capitalization plus short-term debt was 32.5% and 31.5% at December 31, relate to:2018 and 2017, respectively. See Note 8 to the financial statements for additional information.
Sources of Capital
Southern Company intends to meet its future capital needs through operating cash flows, borrowings from financial institutions, and debt and equity issuances in the capital markets. Equity capital can be provided from any combination of Southern Company's stock plans, private placements, or public offerings. The amount and timing of additional equity and debt issuances in 2019, as well as in subsequent years, will be contingent on Southern Company's investment opportunities and the Southern Company system's capital requirements and will depend upon prevailing market conditions and other factors. See "Capital Requirements and Contractual Obligations" herein for additional information.
Except as described herein, the traditional electric operating companies, Southern Power, and Southern Company Gas plan to obtain the funds required for construction and other purposes from operating cash flows, external security issuances, borrowings from financial institutions, and equity contributions or loans from Southern Company. Southern Power also plans to utilize tax equity partnership contributions, as well as funds resulting from its pending sale of Plant Mankato. However, the amount, type, and timing of any future financings, if needed, will depend upon prevailing market conditions, regulatory approval, and other factors. See Note 15 to the financial statements under "Southern PowerSales of Natural Gas Plants" herein for additional information.
In addition, in 2014, Georgia Power entered into the Loan Guarantee Agreement with the DOE, under which the proceeds of borrowings may be used to reimburse Georgia Power for Eligible Project Costs incurred in connection with its construction of Plant Vogtle Units 3 and 4. Under the Loan Guarantee Agreement, the DOE agreed to guarantee borrowings of up to $3.46 billion (not to exceed 70% of Eligible Project Costs) to be made by Georgia Power under a multi-advance credit facility (FFB Credit Facility) among Georgia Power, the DOE, and the FFB. At December 31, 2018, Georgia Power had borrowed $2.6 billion under

MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS (continued)
Southern Company and Subsidiary Companies 2018 Annual Report


the FFB Credit Facility. In July 2017, Georgia Power entered into an amendment to the Loan Guarantee Agreement, which provides that further advances are conditioned upon the DOE's approval of any agreements entered into in replacement of the Vogtle 3 and 4 Agreement and satisfaction of certain other conditions.
In September 2017, the DOE issued a conditional commitment to Georgia Power for up to approximately $1.67 billion of additional guaranteed loans under the Loan Guarantee Agreement. This conditional commitment expires on March 31, 2019, subject to any further extension approved by the DOE. Final approval and issuance of these additional loan guarantees by the DOE cannot be assured and are subject to the negotiation of definitive agreements, completion of due diligence by the DOE, receipt of any necessary regulatory approvals, and satisfaction of other conditions. See Note 8 to the financial statements under "Long-term DebtDOE Loan Guarantee Borrowings" for additional information regarding the Loan Guarantee Agreement, including applicable covenants, events of default, mandatory prepayment events (including any decision not to continue construction of Plant Vogtle Units 3 and 4), and additional conditions to borrowing. Also see Note 2 to the financial statements under "Georgia PowerNuclear Construction" for additional information regarding Plant Vogtle Units 3 and 4.
The issuance of securities by the traditional electric operating companies and Nicor Gas is generally subject to the approval of the applicable state PSC or other applicable state regulatory agency. The issuance of all securities by Mississippi Power and short-term securities by Georgia Power is generally subject to regulatory approval by the FERC. Additionally, with respect to the public offering of securities, Southern Company and certain of its subsidiaries file registration statements with the SEC under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (1933 Act). The amounts of securities authorized by the appropriate regulatory authorities, as well as the securities registered under the 1933 Act, are continuously monitored and appropriate filings are made to ensure flexibility in the capital markets.
Southern Company, each traditional electric operating company, and Southern Power generally obtain financing separately without credit support from any affiliate. The Southern Company system does not maintain a centralized cash or money pool. Therefore, funds of each company are not commingled with funds of any other company in the Southern Company system.
In addition, Southern Company Gas Capital obtains external financing for Southern Company Gas and its subsidiaries, other than Nicor Gas, which obtains financing separately without credit support from any affiliates. Nicor Gas' commercial paper program supports its working capital needs as Nicor Gas is not permitted to make money pool loans to affiliates. All of the other Southern Company Gas subsidiaries benefit from Southern Company Gas Capital's commercial paper program.
See Note 8 to the financial statements under "Bank Credit Arrangements" for additional information.
At December 31, 2018, Southern Company's current liabilities exceeded current assets by $4.7 billion, primarily due to $3.2 billion of long-term debt that is due within one year (including approximately $1.3 billion at the parent company, $0.2 billion at Alabama Power, $0.6 billion at Georgia Power, $0.6 billion at Southern Power, and $0.4 billion at Southern Company Gas) and $2.9 billion of notes payable (including approximately $1.8 billion at the parent company, $0.3 billion at Georgia Power, $0.1 billion at Southern Power, and $0.7 billion at Southern Company Gas). Subsequent to December 31, 2018, using proceeds from the sale of Gulf Power, the Southern Company parent entity repaid $0.7 billion of its long-term debt due within one year and all $1.8 billion of its notes payable at December 31, 2018. See "Financing Activities" herein for additional information. To meet short-term cash needs and contingencies, the Southern Company system has substantial cash flow from operating activities and access to capital markets and financial institutions. Southern Company, the traditional electric operating companies, Southern Power, and Southern Company Gas intend to utilize operating cash flows, as well as commercial paper, lines of credit, bank notes, and securities issuances, as market conditions permit, as well as, under certain circumstances for the traditional electric operating companies, Southern Power, and Southern Company Gas, equity contributions and/or loans from Southern Company to meet their short-term capital needs.

MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS (continued)
Southern Company and Subsidiary Companies 2018 Annual Report


At December 31, 2018, Southern Company and its subsidiaries had approximately $1.4 billion of cash and cash equivalents. Committed credit arrangements with banks at December 31, 2018 were as follows:
 2017 2016 Note
 (in millions)  
Retiree benefit plans$3,931
 $3,959
 (a,n)
Asset retirement obligations-asset1,133
 1,080
 (b,n)
Deferred income tax charges814
 1,590
 (b,p)
Environmental remediation-asset511
 491
 (j,n)
Property damage reserves-asset333
 206
 (i)
Under recovered regulatory clause revenues317
 273
 (g)
Remaining net book value of retired assets306
 351
 (o)
Loss on reacquired debt223
 243
 (c)
Vacation pay183
 182
 (f,n)
Long-term debt fair value adjustment138
 155
 (d)
Deferred PPA charges119
 141
 (e,n)
Kemper County energy facility88
 201
 (h)
Other regulatory assets511
 487
 (k)
Deferred income tax credits(7,261) (219) (b,p)
Other cost of removal obligations(2,684) (2,774) (b)
Over recovered regulatory clause revenues(155) (203) (g)
Property damage reserves-liability(135) (177) (l)
Other regulatory liabilities(266) (120) (m)
Total regulatory assets (liabilities), net$(1,894) $5,866
  
Note: The recovery and amortization periods for these regulatory assets and (liabilities) are as follows:
 Expires   Executable Term Loans Expires Within One Year
Company2019
2020
2022 Total 
Unused(d)
 
One
Year
 
Two
Years
 Term Out No Term Out
 (in millions)
Southern Company(a)
$
 $
 $2,000
 $2,000
 $1,999
 $
 $
 $
 $
Alabama Power33
 500
 800
 1,333
 1,333
 
 
 
 33
Georgia Power
 
 1,750
 1,750
 1,736
 
 
 
 
Mississippi Power100
 
 
 100
 100
 
 
 
 100
Southern Power(b)

 
 750
 750
 727
 
 
 
 
Southern Company Gas(c)

 
 1,900
 1,900
 1,895
 
 
 
 
Other30
 
 
 30
 30
 
 
 
 30
Southern Company Consolidated(e)
$163
 $500
 $7,200
 $7,863
 $7,820
 $
 $
 $
 $163
(a)Recovered and amortized overRepresents the average remaining service period which may range up to 15 years. See Note 2 for additional information.Southern Company parent entity.
(b)Asset retirement and other costDoes not include Southern Power Company's $120 million continuing letter of removal obligationscredit facility for standby letters of credit expiring in 2021, of which $17 million was unused at December 31, 2018. Southern Power's subsidiaries are recorded, deferred income tax assets are recovered, and deferred income tax liabilities are amortized over the related property lives, which may range upnot parties to 80 years. Asset retirement and removal liabilities will be settled and trued up following completion of the related activities.its bank credit arrangement.
(c)Recovered over eitherSouthern Company Gas, as the remaining lifeparent entity, guarantees the obligations of Southern Company Gas Capital, which is the original issue or, if refinanced, overborrower of $1.4 billion of this arrangement. Southern Company Gas' committed credit arrangement also includes $500 million for which Nicor Gas is the remaining lifeborrower and which is restricted for working capital needs of Nicor Gas. Pursuant to this multi-year credit arrangement, the new issue, whichallocations between Southern Company Gas Capital and Nicor Gas may range up to 50 years.be adjusted.
(d)
Recovered over the remaining lifeAmounts used are for letters of the original debt issuances, which range up to 21 years. For additional information see Note 12 under "Southern CompanyMerger with Southern Company Gas."
credit.
(e)Recovered over
Excludes $280 million of committed credit arrangements of Gulf Power, which was sold on January 1, 2019. See Note 15 to the lifefinancial statements under "Southern Company's Sale of Gulf Power" for additional information.
See Note 8 to the financial statements under "Bank Credit Arrangements" for additional information.
Most of these bank credit arrangements, as well as the term loan arrangements of Alabama Power and Southern Power Company, contain covenants that limit debt levels and contain cross-acceleration or cross-default provisions to other indebtedness (including guarantee obligations) that are restricted only to the indebtedness of the individual company. Such cross-default provisions to other indebtedness would trigger an event of default if the applicable borrower defaulted on indebtedness or guarantee obligations over a specified threshold. Such cross-acceleration provisions to other indebtedness would trigger an event of default if the applicable borrower defaulted on indebtedness, the payment of which was then accelerated. At December 31, 2018, Southern Company, the traditional electric operating companies, Southern Power Company, Southern Company Gas, and Nicor Gas were in compliance with all such covenants. None of the bank credit arrangements contain material adverse change clauses at the time of borrowings.
Subject to applicable market conditions, Southern Company and its subsidiaries expect to renew or replace their bank credit arrangements as needed, prior to expiration. In connection therewith, Southern Company and its subsidiaries may extend the maturity dates and/or increase or decrease the lending commitments thereunder.
A portion of the unused credit with banks is allocated to provide liquidity support to the revenue bonds of the traditional electric operating companies and the commercial paper programs of Southern Company, the traditional electric operating companies, Southern Power Company, Southern Company Gas, and Nicor Gas. The amount of variable rate revenue bonds of the traditional electric operating companies outstanding requiring liquidity support at December 31, 2018 was approximately $1.6 billion, which included $82 million related to Gulf Power. In addition, at December 31, 2018, the traditional electric operating companies had approximately $403 million of revenue bonds outstanding that are required to be remarketed within the next 12 months, which included $58 million related to Gulf Power. See Note 15 to the financial statements under "Southern Company's Sale of Gulf Power" for information regarding the sale of Gulf Power on January 1, 2019. Subsequent to December 31, 2018, Georgia Power redeemed approximately $108 million of obligations related to outstanding variable rate pollution control revenue bonds.
Southern Company, Alabama Power, Georgia Power, Southern Power Company, Southern Company Gas, Nicor Gas, and SEGCO make short-term borrowings primarily through commercial paper programs that have the liquidity support of the committed bank credit arrangements described above. Short-term borrowings are included in notes payable in the balance sheets.

MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS (continued)
Southern Company and Subsidiary Companies 2018 Annual Report


Details of short-term borrowings were as follows:
 Short-term Debt at the End of the Period 
Short-term Debt During the Period (*)
 Amount Outstanding Weighted Average Interest Rate Average Amount Outstanding Weighted Average Interest Rate Maximum Amount Outstanding
 (in millions)   (in millions)   (in millions)
December 31, 2018:         
Commercial paper$1,064
 3.0% $1,655
 2.3% $3,042
Short-term bank debt1,851
 3.1% 1,722
 2.9% 2,504
Total$2,915
 3.1% $3,377
 2.6%  
December 31, 2017:         
Commercial paper$1,832
 1.8% $2,117
 1.3% $2,946
Short-term bank debt607
 2.3% 555
 2.1% 1,020
Total$2,439
 1.9% $2,672
 1.5%  
December 31, 2016:         
Commercial paper$1,909
 1.1% $976
 0.8% $1,970
Short-term bank debt123
 1.7% 176
 1.7% 500
Total$2,032
 1.1% $1,152
 1.1%  
(*)Average and maximum amounts are based upon daily balances during the PPA for12-month periods up to six years.ended December 31, 2018, 2017, and 2016.
In addition to the short-term borrowings of Southern Power Company included in the table above, at December 31, 2016, Southern Power Company subsidiaries assumed credit agreements (Project Credit Facilities) with the acquisition of certain solar facilities, which were non-recourse to Southern Power Company, the proceeds of which were used to finance project costs related to such solar facilities. The Project Credit Facilities were fully repaid in January 2017. For the year ended December 31, 2016, the Project Credit Facilities had a maximum amount outstanding of $828 million and an average amount outstanding of $566 million at a weighted average interest rate of 2.1% and had total amounts outstanding of $209 million at a weighted average interest rate of 2.1% at December 31, 2016.
Southern Company believes the need for working capital can be adequately met by utilizing commercial paper programs, lines of credit, bank term loans, and operating cash flows.
Financing Activities
During 2018, Southern Company issued approximately 11.6 million shares of common stock primarily through employee equity compensation plans and received proceeds of approximately $442 million.
In addition, during the third and fourth quarters 2018, Southern Company issued a total of approximately 12.1 million and 2.5 million shares, respectively, of common stock through at-the-market issuances pursuant to sales agency agreements related to Southern Company's continuous equity offering program and received cash proceeds of approximately $540 million and $108 million, respectively, net of $5 million and $1 million in commissions, respectively.

MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS (continued)
Southern Company and Subsidiary Companies 2018 Annual Report


The following table outlines the long-term debt financing activities for Southern Company and its subsidiaries for the year ended December 31, 2018:
Company
Senior
Note
Issuances
 
Senior Note
Maturities, Redemptions, and Repurchases
 
Revenue
Bond
Issuances and
Reofferings
of Purchased
Bonds
 
Revenue
Bond
Maturities, Redemptions,
 and Repurchases
 
Other
Long-Term
Debt
Issuances
 
Other
Long-Term
Debt
Redemptions
and
Maturities(a)
 (in millions)
Southern Company(b)
$750
 $1,000
 $
 $
 $
 $
Alabama Power500
 
 120
 120
 
 1
Georgia Power
 1,500
 108
 469
 
 111
Mississippi Power600
 155
 
 43
 
 900
Southern Power
 350
 
 
 
 420
Southern Company Gas
 155
 
 200
 300
 
Other(c)

 100
 
 
 100
 13
Elimination(d)

 
 
 
 
 (4)
Southern Company Consolidated$1,850
 $3,260
 $228
 $832
 $400
 $1,441
(a)Includes reductions in capital lease obligations resulting from cash payments under capital leases.
(f)(b)Recorded as earned by employees and recovered as paid, generally within one year. This includes both vacation and banked holiday pay.Represents the Southern Company parent entity.
(g)Recorded and recovered or amortized as approved or accepted by the appropriate state PSCs or other applicable regulatory agencies over periods generally not exceeding 10 years.
(h)(c)
Includes $114In November 2018, SEGCO, as borrower, and Alabama Power, as guarantor, entered into a $100 million long-term delayed draw floating rate bank term loan bearing interest based on three-month LIBOR, which SEGCO used to repay at maturity $100 million aggregate principal amount of regulatory assets and $26 million of regulatory liabilitiesSeries 2013A Senior Notes due December 1, 2018. See Note 9 to be recovered over periods of eight and six years, respectively. For additional information, see Note 3the financial statements under "Kemper County Energy FacilityRate RecoveryKemper Settlement Agreement."
(i)
Previous under-recovery as of December 2013 is recorded and recovered or amortized as approved by the Georgia PSC through 2019. Amortization of $319 million related to the under-recovery from January 2014 through December 2017 is expected to be determined by the Georgia PSC in the 2019 base rate case. See Note 3 under "Regulatory MattersGeorgia PowerStorm Damage RecoveryGuarantees" for additional information.
(j)(d)Recovered through environmental cost recovery mechanisms when the remediation is performed or the work is performed.Represents reductions in affiliate capital lease obligations at Georgia Power, which are eliminated in Southern Company's consolidated financial statements.
(k)Comprised of numerous immaterial components including nuclear outage, fuel-hedging losses, deferred income tax charges - Medicare subsidy, cancelled construction projects, building and generating plant leases, property tax, and other miscellaneous assets. These costs are recorded and recovered or amortized as approved by the appropriate state PSCs over periods generally not exceeding 50 years.
(l)Recovered as storm restoration and potential reliability-related expenses are incurred as approved by the appropriate state PSCs.
(m)Comprised of numerous immaterial components including retiree benefit plans, fuel-hedging gains, AROs, and other liabilities that are recorded and recovered or amortized as approved by the appropriate state PSCs or other applicable regulatory agencies generally over periods not exceeding 20 years.
(n)Not earning a return as offset in rate base by a corresponding asset or liability.
(o)Amortized as approved by the appropriate state PSCs over periods generally up to 48 years.
(p)
As a result of the Tax Reform Legislation, these accounts include certain deferred income tax assets and liabilities not subject to normalization. The recovery and amortization of these amounts will be determined by the appropriate state PSCs or other applicable regulatory agencies. See Note 3 under "Regulatory Matters" and Note 5 for additional information.
Except as otherwise described herein, Southern Company and its subsidiaries used the proceeds of debt issuances for their redemptions and maturities shown in the table above, to repay short-term indebtedness, and for general corporate purposes, including working capital. The subsidiaries also used the proceeds for their construction programs.
In March 2018, Southern Company entered into a $900 million short-term floating rate bank loan bearing interest based on one-month LIBOR, which was repaid in August 2018.
In April 2018, Southern Company borrowed $250 million pursuant to a short-term uncommitted bank credit arrangement, bearing interest at a rate agreed upon by Southern Company and the bank from time to time and payable on no less than 30 days' demand by the bank. Subsequent to December 31, 2018, Southern Company repaid this loan.
In June 2018, Southern Company repaid at maturity two $100 million short-term floating rate bank term loans.
In August 2018, Southern Company issued $750 million aggregate principal amount of Series 2018A Floating Rate Senior Notes due February 14, 2020 bearing interest based on three-month LIBOR, entered into a $1.5 billion short-term floating rate bank loan bearing interest based on one-month LIBOR, and repaid $250 million borrowed in August 2017 pursuant to a short-term uncommitted bank credit arrangement. Subsequent to December 31, 2018, Southern Company repaid the $1.5 billion short-term floating rate bank loan.
In the event that a portionthird quarter 2018, Southern Company repaid at maturity $500 million aggregate principal amount of a traditional electric operating company's or a natural gas distribution utility's operations is no longer subject1.55% Senior Notes and $500 million aggregate principal amount of Series 2013A 2.45% Senior Notes.
Subsequent to applicable accounting rulesDecember 31, 2018, through cash tender offers, Southern Company repurchased and retired approximately $522 million of the $1.0 billion aggregate principal amount outstanding of its 1.85% Senior Notes due July 1, 2019 (1.85% Notes), approximately $180 million of the $350 million aggregate principal amount outstanding of its Series 2014B 2.15% Senior Notes due September 1, 2019 (Series 2014B Notes), and approximately $504 million of the $750 million aggregate principal amount outstanding of its Series 2018A Floating Rate Notes due February 14, 2020 (Series 2018A Notes), for rate regulation, such company would be required to write off to income or reclassify to accumulated OCI related regulatory assetsan aggregate purchase price, excluding accrued and liabilities that are not specifically recoverable through regulated rates.unpaid interest, of approximately $1.2 billion. In addition, subsequent to December 31, 2018, and following the traditional electric operating company or natural gas distribution utility would be required to determine if any impairment to other assets, including plant, existscompletion of the cash tender offers, Southern Company completed the redemption of all of the Series 2018A Notes remaining outstanding and write downcalled for redemption all of the assets, if impaired, to their fair values. All regulatory assets1.85% Notes and liabilitiesSeries 2014B Notes remaining outstanding.
    Table of Contents                                Index to Financial Statements

NOTESMANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS (continued)
Southern Company and Subsidiary Companies 20172018 Annual Report


areSubsequent to be reflectedDecember 31, 2018, Alabama Power repaid at maturity $200 million aggregate principal amount of Series Z 5.125% Senior Notes.
In January 2018, Georgia Power repaid its outstanding $150 million short-term floating rate bank loan due May 31, 2018.
In May 2018, through cash tender offers, Georgia Power repurchased and retired $89 million of the $250 million aggregate principal amount outstanding of its Series 2007A 5.65% Senior Notes due March 1, 2037, $326 million of the $500 million aggregate principal amount outstanding of its Series 2009A 5.95% Senior Notes due February 1, 2039, and $335 million of the $600 million aggregate principal amount outstanding of its Series 2010B 5.40% Senior Notes due June 1, 2040, for an aggregate purchase price, excluding accrued and unpaid interest, of $902 million.
Subsequent to December 31, 2018, Georgia Power redeemed approximately $13 million, $20 million, and $75 million aggregate principal amount of Development Authority of Burke County (Georgia) Pollution Control Revenue Bonds (Georgia Power Company Plant Vogtle Project), First Series 1992, Eighth Series 1994, and Second Series 1995, respectively.
In March 2018, Mississippi Power entered into a $300 million short-term floating rate bank loan bearing interest based on one-month LIBOR, of which $200 million was repaid in rates.the second quarter 2018 and $100 million was repaid in the third quarter 2018. The proceeds of this loan, together with the proceeds of Mississippi Power's $600 million senior notes issuances, were used to repay Mississippi Power's $900 million unsecured floating rate term loan.
In October 2018, Mississippi Power completed the redemption of all 334,210 outstanding shares of its preferred stock (as well as related depositary shares), with an aggregate par value of approximately $33.4 million.
In May 2018, Southern Power entered into two short-term floating rate bank loans, each for an aggregate principal amount of $100 million, which bear interest based on one-month LIBOR. In November 2018, Southern Power repaid one of these short-term loans.
During 2018, Southern Power received approximately $148 million of third-party tax equity related to certain of its renewable facilities. See Note 315 to the financial statements under "Regulatory MattersAlabamaSouthern Power," " – Georgia Power," " – Gulf Power," and " – Southern Company Gas" and "Kemper County Energy Facility" for additional information.
RevenuesPrior to its sale, in the second quarter 2018, Pivotal Utility Holdings caused $200 million aggregate principal amount of gas facility revenue bonds to be redeemed.
Wholesale capacity revenuesIn May 2018, Southern Company Gas Capital borrowed $95 million pursuant to a short-term uncommitted bank credit arrangement, guaranteed by Southern Company Gas, bearing interest at a rate agreed upon by Southern Company Gas Capital and the bank from PPAstime to time and payable on no less than 30 days' demand by the bank. In July 2018, Southern Company Gas Capital repaid this loan.
Other long-term debt issuances for Southern Company Gas include the issuance by Nicor Gas of $300 million aggregate principal amount of first mortgage bonds in a private placement, of which $100 million was issued in August 2018 and $200 million was issued in November 2018.
In addition to any financings that may be necessary to meet capital requirements and contractual obligations, Southern Company and its subsidiaries plan to continue, when economically feasible, a program to retire higher-cost securities and replace these obligations with lower-cost capital if market conditions permit.
Credit Rating Risk
At December 31, 2018, Southern Company and its subsidiaries did not have any credit arrangements that would require material changes in payment schedules or terminations as a result of a credit rating downgrade.
There are recognized either oncertain contracts that could require collateral, but not accelerated payment, in the event of a levelized basis over the appropriate contract period credit rating change of certain subsidiaries to BBB and/or the amount billable under the contract terms. Energy and other revenuesBaa2 or below. These contracts are recognized as services are provided. Unbilled revenues related to retail sales are accrued at the end of each fiscal period. Retail rates for the traditional electric operating companiesphysical electricity and natural gas distribution utilitiespurchases and sales, fuel purchases, fuel transportation and storage, energy price risk management, transmission, interest rate management, and construction of new generation at Plant Vogtle Units 3 and 4.

MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS (continued)
Southern Company and Subsidiary Companies 2018 Annual Report


The maximum potential collateral requirements under these contracts at December 31, 2018 were as follows:
Credit Ratings
Maximum
Potential
Collateral
Requirements(a)
 (in millions)
At BBB and/or Baa2$30
At BBB- and/or Baa3$542
At BB+ and/or Ba1(b)
$2,176
(a)
Includes potential collateral requirements related to Gulf Power of $111 million and $221 million at a credit rating of BBB- and/or Baa3 and BB+ and/or Ba1, respectively. See Note 15 to the financial statements under "Southern Company's Sale of Gulf Power" for information regarding the sale of Gulf Power on January 1, 2019.
(b)Any additional credit rating downgrades at or below BB- and/or Ba3 could increase collateral requirements up to an additional $38 million.
Generally, collateral may be provided by a Southern Company guaranty, letter of credit, or cash. Additionally, a credit rating downgrade could impact the ability of Southern Company and its subsidiaries to access capital markets and would be likely to impact the cost at which they do so.
On February 26, 2018, Moody's revised its rating outlook for Mississippi Power from stable to positive. On August 8, 2018, Moody's upgraded Mississippi Power's senior unsecured rating to Baa3 from Ba1 and maintained the positive rating outlook.
On February 28, 2018, Fitch removed Mississippi Power from rating watch negative and revised its rating outlook from stable to positive.
Also on February 28, 2018, Fitch downgraded the senior unsecured long-term debt rating of Southern Company to BBB+ from A- with a stable outlook and of Georgia Power to A from A+ with a negative outlook. On August 9, 2018, Fitch downgraded the senior unsecured long-term debt rating of Georgia Power to A- from A.
On March 14, 2018, S&P upgraded the senior unsecured long-term debt rating of Mississippi Power to A- from BBB+. The outlook remained negative.
On August 8, 2018, Moody's downgraded the senior unsecured debt rating of Georgia Power to Baa1 from A3.
On September 28, 2018, Moody's revised its rating outlooks for Southern Company, Alabama Power, and Georgia Power from negative to stable.
Also on September 28, 2018, Fitch assigned a negative rating outlook to the ratings of Southern Company and its subsidiaries (excluding Mississippi Power).
As a result of the Tax Reform Legislation, certain financial metrics, such as the funds from operations to debt percentage, used by the credit rating agencies to assess Southern Company and its subsidiaries may be negatively impacted. Southern Company and most of its regulated subsidiaries have taken actions to mitigate the resulting impacts, which, among other alternatives, include provisions to adjust billings for fluctuations in fueladjusting capital structure. Absent actions by Southern Company and purchased gas costs, fuel hedging,its subsidiaries that fully mitigate the energy componentimpacts, the credit ratings of purchased power costs,Southern Company and certain other costs. For the traditional electric operating companies, revenues are adjusted for differences between these actual costs and amounts billed in current regulated rates. Under or over recovered regulatory clause revenues are recorded in the balance sheets and are recovered or returned to customers through adjustmentsof its subsidiaries could be negatively affected. See Note 2 to the billing factors.
The tariffsfinancial statements for several of the natural gas distribution utilities include provisions which allow for the recognition of certain revenues prioradditional information related to state PSC or other regulatory agency actions related to the time such revenuesTax Reform Legislation, including approvals of capital structure adjustments for Alabama Power, Georgia Power, and Atlanta Gas Light by their respective state PSCs, which are billedexpected to customers, so long ashelp mitigate the amounts recognized will be collected from customers within 24 months. Programspotential adverse impacts to certain of this type include weather normalization adjustments, revenue normalization mechanisms, and revenue true-up adjustments and are referred to as alternative revenue programs.their credit metrics.
Southern Company's electric utility subsidiaries and Southern Company Gas have a diversified base of customers. No single customer or industry comprises 10% or more of revenues. For all periods presented, uncollectible accounts averaged less than 1% of revenues.
Fuel Costs
Fuel costs are expensed as the fuel is used. Fuel expense generally includes fuel transportation costs and the cost of purchased emissions allowances as they are used. Fuel expense also includes the amortization of the cost of nuclear fuel and a charge, based on nuclear generation, for the permanent disposal of spent nuclear fuel.
Cost of Natural Gas
Excluding Atlanta Gas Light, which does not sell natural gas to end-use customers, Southern Company Gas charges itsthe natural gas distribution utilities charge their utility customers for natural gas consumed using natural gas cost recovery mechanisms set by the applicable state regulatory agencies. Under these mechanisms, all prudently-incurred natural gas costs are passed through to customers without markup, subject to regulatory review. Southern Company Gas defersThe natural gas distribution utilities defer or accruesaccrue the difference between the actual cost of natural gas and the amount of commodity revenue earned in a given period such that no operating income is recognized related to these costs.period. The deferred or accrued amount is either billed or refunded to customers prospectively through adjustments to the commodity rate. Deferred natural gas costs are reflected as regulatory assets and accrued natural gas costs are included in the balance sheetsreflected as regulatory assetsliabilities. Therefore, gas costs recovered through natural gas revenues generally equal the amount expensed in cost of natural gas and regulatory liabilities, respectively.do not affect net income from the natural gas distribution utilities. Cost of natural gas at the natural gas distribution utilities represented 83.2% of the total cost of natural gas for 2018.
IncomeGas marketing services customers are charged for actual and Other Taxesestimated natural gas consumed. Cost of natural gas includes the cost of fuel and associated transportation costs, lost and unaccounted for gas, adjustments to reduce the value of inventories to market value, if applicable, and gains and losses associated with certain derivatives.
Cost of natural gas in 2018 was $1.5 billion, a decrease of $62 million, or 3.9%, compared to 2017, which was substantially all as a result of the Southern Company Gas Dispositions.

MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS (continued)
Southern Company usesand Subsidiary Companies 2018 Annual Report


Cost of Other Sales
Cost of other sales in 2018 was $12 million, a decrease of $17 million, or 58.6%, compared to 2017 primarily related to the liability methoddisposition of accounting for deferred income taxesPivotal Home Solutions.
Other Operations and provides deferred income taxes for all significant income tax temporary differences. Taxes that are collected from customers on behalf of governmental agenciesMaintenance Expenses
Other operations and maintenance expenses increased $36 million, or 3.8%, in 2018 compared to be remittedthe prior year. Excluding a $39 million decrease related to these agencies are presented net on the statements of income. In accordance with regulatory requirements, deferred federal ITCs for the traditional electric operating companies and Southern Company Gas are amortized overDispositions, other operations and maintenance expenses increased $75 million. This increase was primarily due to a $53 million increase in compensation and benefit costs, including a $12 million one-time increase for the average livesadoption of a new paid time off policy to align with the Southern Company system, a $28 million increase in disposition-related costs, and an $11 million expense for a litigation settlement to facilitate the sale of Pivotal Home Solutions. These increases were partially offset by a $27 million decrease in bad debt expense primarily at Nicor Gas, which was offset by a decrease in revenues as a result of the related property with suchregulatory recovery mechanism. See Note 3 to the financial statements under "General Litigation Matters – Southern Company Gas" for additional information on the litigation settlement.
Depreciation and Amortization
Depreciation and amortization normally applieddecreased $1 million, or 0.2%, in 2018 compared to the prior year. Excluding a $37 million decrease related to the Southern Company Gas Dispositions, depreciation and amortization increased $36 million. The increase was primarily due to continued infrastructure investments at the natural gas distribution utilities, partially offset by lower amortization of intangible assets as a creditresult of fair value adjustments in acquisition accounting at gas marketing services. See Note 2 to reduce depreciationthe financial statements under "Southern Company Gas" for additional information on infrastructure replacement programs.
Taxes Other Than Income Taxes
Taxes other than income taxes increased $27 million, or 14.7%, in 2018 compared to the statements of income. Under currentprior year. Excluding a $4 million decrease related to the Southern Company Gas Dispositions, taxes other than income taxes increased $31 million. This increase primarily reflects a $13 million increase in revenue tax law, certain projects at Southern Power are eligible for federal ITCs or cash grants. Southern Power has elected to receive ITCs. The credits are recordedexpenses as a deferredresult of higher natural gas revenues, a $12 million increase in Nicor Gas' invested capital tax that reflects a $7 million credit in 2017 to establish a related regulatory asset, and are amortizeda $4 million increase in property taxes. See Note 15 to income tax expense over the lifefinancial statements under "Southern Company Gas" for additional information on the Southern Company Gas Dispositions.
Impairment Charges
A goodwill impairment charge of $42 million was recorded in 2018 in contemplation of the asset. Furthermore,sale of Pivotal Home Solutions. See Notes 1 and 15 to the tax basis of the asset is reduced by 50% of the credits received, resulting in a net deferred tax asset. Southern Power has elected to recognize the tax benefit of this basis difference as a reduction to income tax expense in the year in which the plant reaches commercial operation. In addition, certain projects are eligible for federal PTCs, which are recorded to income tax expense based on KWH production.
Federal ITCs and PTCs, as well as state ITCs and other state tax credits available to reduce income taxes payable, were not fully utilized in 2017 and will be carried forward and utilized in future years. In addition, Southern Company is expected to have a consolidated federal net operating loss (NOL) carryforward for the 2017 tax year along with various state NOL carryforwards, which would result in income tax benefits in the future, if utilized. See Note 5financial statements under "CurrentGoodwill and Deferred Income TaxesOther Intangible Assets and Liabilities" and "Southern Company GasTax Credit CarryforwardsSale of Pivotal Home Solutions," respectively, for additional information.
Gain on Dispositions, Net
Gain on dispositions, net was $291 million in 2018 and was associated with the Southern Company Gas Dispositions. The income tax expense on these gains included income tax expense on goodwill not deductible for tax purposes and for which a deferred tax liability had not been recorded previously.
Earnings from Equity Method Investments
Earnings from equity method investments increased $42 million, or 39.6%, in 2018 compared to the prior year. The increase was primarily due to higher earnings from Southern Company Gas' equity method investment in SNG from new rates effective September 2018 and lower operations and maintenance expenses due to the timing of pipeline maintenance. See Note 7 to the financial statements under "Southern Company GasNet Operating LossEquity Method Investments" for additional information.
Interest Expense, Net of Amounts Capitalized
Interest expense, net of amounts capitalized increased $28 million, or 14.0%, in 2018 compared to the prior year. The increase was primarily due to $21 million of additional interest expense related to new debt issuances and a $4 million reduction in capitalized interest primarily due to the Dalton Pipeline being placed in service in August 2017.
Other Income (Expense), Net
Other income (expense), net decreased $43 million, or 97.7%, in 2018 compared to the prior year. Excluding a $3 million decrease related to the Southern Company Gas Dispositions, other income (expense), net decreased $40 million. This decrease

MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS (continued)
Southern Company and Subsidiary Companies 2018 Annual Report


was primarily due to a $23 million increase in charitable donations and a $13 million decrease in gains from the settlement of contractor litigation claims. See Note 2 to the financial statements under "Southern Company recognizesGasInfrastructure Replacement Programs and Capital Projects– PRP" for additional information on the contractor litigation settlement.
Income Taxes
Income taxes increased $97 million, or 26.4%, in 2018 compared to the prior year. Excluding a $329 million increase related to the Southern Company Gas Dispositions, including tax positions that are "more likely than not"expense on the goodwill for which a deferred tax liability had not been previously provided, income taxes decreased $232 million. This decrease was primarily due to a lower federal income tax rate and the flowback of being sustained upon examination byexcess deferred taxes as a result of the appropriate taxing authorities.Tax Reform Legislation. In addition, 2017 included additional tax expense of $130 million from the revaluation of deferred tax assets associated with the Tax Reform Legislation, the enactment of the State of Illinois income tax legislation, and new income tax apportionment factors in several states. See Note 510 to the financial statements for additional information.
Other Business Activities
Southern Company's other business activities primarily include the parent company (which does not allocate operating expenses to business units); PowerSecure, which was acquired on May 9, 2016 and is a provider of energy solutions, including distributed infrastructure, energy efficiency products and services, and utility infrastructure services, to customers; Southern Company Holdings, Inc. (Southern Holdings), which invests in various projects, including leveraged lease projects; and Southern Linc, which provides digital wireless communications for use by Southern Company and its subsidiary companies and also markets these services to the public and provides fiber optics services within the Southeast.
A condensed statement of income for Southern Company's other business activities follows:
 Amount 
Increase (Decrease)
from Prior Year
 2018 2018 2017
 (in millions)
Operating revenues$1,015
 $444
 $268
Cost of other sales728
 313
 223
Other operations and maintenance273
 69
 9
Depreciation and amortization66
 14
 21
Taxes other than income taxes6
 3
 
Impairment charges12
 12
 
Total operating expenses1,085
 411
 253
Operating income (loss)(70) 33
 15
Interest expense579
 96
 178
Other income (expense), net(23) (23) 30
Income taxes (benefit)(222) 85
 (91)
Net income (loss)$(450) $(171) $(42)
In the table above, the 2018 changes for these other business activities reflect the inclusion of PowerSecure for the year ended December 31, 2018 compared to 2017. The 2017 changes reflect the inclusion of PowerSecure for the 12-month period in 2017 compared to the eight-month period following the acquisition on May 9, 2016, which is the primary variance driver. Additional detailed variance explanations are provided herein. See Note 15 to the financial statements under "Unrecognized Tax BenefitsSouthern Company Acquisition of PowerSecure" for additional information.
Operating Revenues
Southern Company's operating revenues for these other business activities increased $444 million, or 77.8%, in 2018 as compared to the prior year. The increase was primarily related to PowerSecure's storm restoration services in Puerto Rico.
Cost of Other Sales
Cost of other sales for these other business activities increased $313 million, or 75.4% in 2018. The increase was primarily related to PowerSecure's storm restoration services in Puerto Rico.

MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS (continued)
Southern Company and Subsidiary Companies 2018 Annual Report


Other Operations and Maintenance Expenses
Other operations and maintenance expenses for these other business activities increased $69 million, or 33.8%, in 2018 as compared to the prior year. The increase was primarily due to PowerSecure's storm restoration services in Puerto Rico and parent company expenses related to the sale of Gulf Power. Other operations and maintenance expenses for these other business activities increased $9 million, or 4.6%, in 2017 as compared to the prior year. The increase was primarily due to a $44 million increase as a result of the inclusion of PowerSecure results for the 12-month period in 2017 compared to eight months in 2016, partially offset by a $35 million decrease in parent company expenses related to the Merger and the acquisition of PowerSecure.
Impairment Charges
Impairment charges for these other business activities were $12 million in 2018. These charges were associated with Southern Linc's tower leases and were recorded in contemplation of the sale of Gulf Power.
Interest Expense
Interest expense for these other business activities increased $96 million, or 19.9%, in 2018 as compared to the prior year primarily due to an increase in variable interest rates and average outstanding debt at the parent company. Interest expense for these other business activities increased $178 million, or 58.4%, in 2017 as compared to the prior year primarily due to an increase in average outstanding long-term debt at the parent company. See Note 8 to the financial statements for additional information.
Other Income (Expense), Net
Other income (expense), net for these other business activities decreased $23 million in 2018 as compared to the prior year primarily due to charitable donations, partially offset by leveraged lease income at Southern Holdings. See Note 1 to the financial statements for additional information. Other income (expense), net for these other business activities increased $30 million in 2017 as compared to the prior year primarily due to expenses associated with bridge financing for the Merger in 2016.
Income Taxes (Benefit)
The income tax benefit for these other business activities decreased $85 million, or 27.7%, in 2018 as compared to the prior year primarily as a result of the Tax Reform Legislation, partially offset by an increase in pre-tax losses at the parent company. The income tax benefit for these other business activities increased $91 million, or 42.1%, in 2017 as compared to the prior year primarily as a result of pre-tax earnings (losses) and net tax benefits related to the Tax Reform Legislation. See FUTURE EARNINGS POTENTIAL – "Income Tax MattersFederal Tax Reform Legislation" herein and Note 10 to the financial statements for additional information.
Effects of Inflation
The electric operating companies and natural gas distribution utilities are subject to rate regulation that is generally based on the recovery of historical and projected costs. The effects of inflation can create an economic loss since the recovery of costs could be in dollars that have less purchasing power. Southern Power is party to long-term contracts reflecting market-based rates, including inflation expectations. Any adverse effect of inflation on Southern Company's results of operations has not been substantial in recent years.
FUTURE EARNINGS POTENTIAL
General
The traditional electric operating companies operate as vertically integrated utilities providing electric service to customers within their service territories in the Southeast. On January 1, 2019, Southern Company completed the sale of Gulf Power, one of the traditional electric operating companies, to NextEra Energy. The natural gas distribution utilities provide service to customers in their service territories in Illinois, Georgia, Virginia, and Tennessee. In July 2018, Southern Company Gas completed sales of three of its natural gas distribution utilities. Prices for electricity provided and natural gas distributed to retail customers are set by state PSCs or other applicable state regulatory agencies under cost-based regulatory principles. Retail rates and earnings are reviewed and may be adjusted periodically within certain limitations. Prices for wholesale electricity sales and natural gas distribution, interconnecting transmission lines, and the exchange of electric power are regulated by the FERC. Southern Power continues to focus on long-term PPAs. In 2018, Southern Power completed sales of noncontrolling interests in entities indirectly owning substantially all of its solar facilities and eight of its wind facilities and also completed sales and entered into an agreement to sell certain of its natural gas plants. See ACCOUNTING POLICIES – "Application of Critical Accounting Policies
    Table of Contents                                Index to Financial Statements

NOTESMANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS (continued)
Southern Company and Subsidiary Companies 20172018 Annual Report


Property,and EstimatesUtility Regulation" herein and Note 2 to the financial statements for additional information about regulatory matters.
The results of operations for the past three years are not necessarily indicative of Southern Company's future earnings potential. Future earnings will be impacted by the 2018 disposition activities described herein and in Note 15 to the financial statements. The level of Southern Company's future earnings depends on numerous factors that affect the opportunities, challenges, and risks of the Southern Company system's primary businesses of selling electricity and distributing natural gas. These factors include the traditional electric operating companies' and the natural gas distribution utilities' ability to maintain constructive regulatory environments that allow for the timely recovery of prudently-incurred costs during a time of increasing costs, continued customer growth, and, for the traditional electric operating companies, the weak pace of growth in electricity use per customer, especially in residential and commercial markets. Plant Vogtle Units 3 and Equipment4 construction and rate recovery and the profitability of Southern Power's competitive wholesale business are also major factors.
Property, plant,Earnings in the electricity business will also depend upon maintaining and equipment is stated at original cost less any regulatory disallowancesgrowing sales, considering, among other things, the adoption and/or penetration rates of increasingly energy-efficient technologies, increasing volumes of electronic commerce transactions, and impairments. Original cost includes: materials; labor; minor itemsmore multi-family home construction, all of property; appropriate administrativewhich could contribute to a net reduction in customer usage. Earnings for both the electricity and general costs; payroll-related costs such as taxes, pensions,natural gas businesses are subject to a variety of other factors. These factors include weather, competition, new energy contracts with other utilities and other benefits;wholesale customers, energy conservation practiced by customers, the use of alternative energy sources by customers, the prices of electricity and natural gas, the price elasticity of demand, and the rate of economic growth or decline in the service territory. In addition, the level of future earnings for the wholesale electric business also depends on numerous factors including regulatory matters, creditworthiness of customers, total electric generating capacity available and related costs, the development or acquisition of renewable facilities and other energy projects, and the successful remarketing of capacity as current contracts expire. Demand for electricity and natural gas is primarily driven by the pace of economic growth that may be affected by changes in regional and global economic conditions, which may impact future earnings. In addition, the volatility of natural gas prices has a significant impact on the natural gas distribution utilities' customer rates, long-term competitive position against other energy sources, and the ability of Southern Company Gas' gas marketing services and wholesale gas services businesses to capture value from locational and seasonal spreads. Additionally, changes in commodity prices subject a significant portion of Southern Company Gas' operations to earnings variability.
As part of its ongoing effort to adapt to changing market conditions, Southern Company continues to evaluate and consider a wide array of potential business strategies. These strategies may include business combinations, partnerships, and acquisitions involving other utility or non-utility businesses or properties, disposition of certain assets or businesses, internal restructuring, or some combination thereof. Furthermore, Southern Company may engage in new business ventures that arise from competitive and regulatory changes in the utility industry. Pursuit of any of the above strategies, or any combination thereof, may significantly affect the business operations, risks, and financial condition of Southern Company.
On January 1, 2019, Southern Company completed the sale of Gulf Power to NextEra Energy for an aggregate cash purchase price of approximately $5.8 billion (less $1.3 billion of indebtedness assumed), subject to customary working capital adjustments. In 2018, net income attributable to Gulf Power was $160 million.
On June 4, 2018, Southern Company Gas completed the stock sale of Pivotal Home Solutions to American Water Enterprises LLC for a total cash purchase price of $365 million. On July 1, 2018, a Southern Company Gas subsidiary, Pivotal Utility Holdings, completed the sales of the assets of two of its natural gas distribution utilities, Elizabethtown Gas and Elkton Gas, to South Jersey Industries, Inc. for a total cash purchase price of $1.7 billion. On July 29, 2018, Southern Company Gas and its wholly-owned direct subsidiary, NUI Corporation, completed the stock sale of Pivotal Utility Holdings, which primarily consisted of Florida City Gas, to NextEra Energy for a total cash purchase price of $587 million. The total cash purchase price for each transaction includes final working capital and other adjustments.
The Southern Company Gas Dispositions resulted in a net loss of $51 million, which includes $342 million of tax expense. The after-tax impacts of these dispositions included income tax expense on goodwill not deductible for tax purposes and for which a deferred tax liability had not been recorded previously. In addition, a goodwill impairment charge of $42 million was recorded during 2018 in contemplation of the sale of Pivotal Home Solutions.
On May 22, 2018, Southern Power sold a noncontrolling 33% equity interest capitalizedin SP Solar, a limited partnership indirectly owning substantially all of Southern Power's solar facilities, for approximately $1.2 billion and, coston December 11, 2018, sold a noncontrolling tax equity interest in SP Wind, a holding company owning a portfolio of eight operating wind facilities, for approximately $1.2 billion. Additionally, on November 5, 2018, Southern Power entered into an agreement to sell all of its equity funds used during construction.interests in Plant Mankato (including the 385-MW expansion currently under construction) for an aggregate purchase price of approximately $650 million. The completion of the disposition is subject to the expansion unit reaching commercial operation as well as various other customary conditions to closing, including FERC and state commission approvals, and the sale is expected

MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS (continued)
Southern Company and Subsidiary Companies 2018 Annual Report


to close mid-2019. The ultimate outcome of this matter cannot be determined at this time. On December 4, 2018, Southern Power sold of all of its equity interests in the Florida Plants to NextEra Energy for approximately $203 million.
See Note 15 to the financial statements for additional information regarding disposition activities.
Environmental Matters
The Southern Company system's property, plant,operations are regulated by state and equipment in service consistedfederal environmental agencies through a variety of the following at December 31:
 2017 2016
 (in millions)
Electric utilities:   
Generation$51,279
 $48,836
Transmission11,562
 11,156
Distribution19,239
 18,418
General4,276
 4,629
Plant acquisition adjustment126
 126
Electric utility plant in service86,482
 83,165
Natural gas distribution utilities:   
Transportation and distribution13,078
 11,996
Utility plant in service99,560
 95,161
Information technology equipment and software752
 544
Communications equipment456
 424
Storage facilities1,598
 1,463
Other1,176
 824
Total other plant in service3,982
 3,255
Total plant in service$103,542
 $98,416
laws and regulations governing air, water, land, and protection of other natural resources. The cost of replacements of property, exclusive of minor items of property, is capitalized.Southern Company system maintains comprehensive environmental compliance and GHG strategies to assess upcoming requirements and compliance costs associated with these environmental laws and regulations. The cost of maintenance, repairs, and replacement of minor items of property is charged to othercosts, including capital expenditures, operations and maintenance expensescosts, and costs reflected in ARO liabilities, required to comply with environmental laws and regulations and to achieve stated goals may impact future electric generating unit retirement and replacement decisions, results of operations, cash flows, and/or financial condition. Related costs may result from the installation of additional environmental controls, closure and monitoring of CCR facilities, unit retirements, or changing fuel sources for certain existing units, as incurred well as related upgrades to the Southern Company system's transmission and distribution (electric and natural gas) systems. A major portion of these costs is expected to be recovered through retail and wholesale rates. The ultimate impact of environmental laws and regulations and the GHG goals discussed herein will depend on various factors, such as state adoption and implementation of requirements, the availability and cost of any deployed technology, fuel prices, and the outcome of pending and/or performed withfuture legal challenges.
New or revised environmental laws and regulations could affect many areas of the exceptiontraditional electric operating companies', Southern Power's, and the natural gas distribution utilities' operations. The impact of nuclear refueling costs. In accordance withany such changes cannot be determined at this time. Environmental compliance costs could affect earnings if such costs cannot continue to be recovered in rates on a timely basis for the traditional electric operating companies and the natural gas distribution utilities or through long-term wholesale agreements for the traditional electric operating companies and Southern Power. Further, increased costs that are recovered through regulated rates could contribute to reduced demand for electricity and natural gas, which could negatively affect results of operations, cash flows, and/or financial condition. Additionally, many commercial and industrial customers may also be affected by existing and future environmental requirements, which for some may have the potential to ultimately affect their respective state PSC orders, Alabama Powerdemand for electricity and Georgia Power defer and amortize nuclear refueling costs over the unit's operating cycle, which ranges from 18 to 24 months.natural gas.
Assets acquired under a capital lease are included in property, plant, and equipment and are further detailed in the table below:

Asset Balances at
December 31,

2017
2016

(in millions)
Office buildings$216

$61
Nitrogen plant(*)


83
Computer-related equipment51

63
Gas pipeline6

6
Less: Accumulated amortization(72)
(69)
Balance, net of amortization$201

$144
(*)Represents a nitrogen supply agreement for the air separation unit of the Kemper County energy facility, which was terminated following the suspension of the gasifier portion of the project. See Note 6 under "Capital Leases" for additional information.
The amountSouthern Company system's commitment to the environment has been demonstrated in many ways, including participating in partnerships resulting in approximately $140 million of non-cash property additions recognized forfunding that has restored or enhanced more than 2 million acres of habitat since 2003; the years ended removal of more than 15.5 million pounds of trash and debris from waterways between 2000 and 2018 through the Renew Our Rivers program; a 21.2% reduction in surface water withdrawal from 2015 to 2017; reductions in SODecember 31, 2017, 2016, and 20152 was $985 million,and NOX air emissions of 98% and 89%, respectively, from 1990 to 2017; the reduction of mercury air emissions of over 95% from 2005 to 2017; and the Southern Company system's changing energy mix.
Through 2018, the traditional electric operating companies have invested approximately $14.2 billion in environmental capital retrofit projects to comply with environmental requirements, with annual totals of approximately $1.3 billion, $0.9 billion, and $844 million,$0.5 billion for 2018, 2017, and 2016, respectively. Although the timing, requirements, and estimated costs could change as environmental laws and regulations are adopted or modified, as compliance plans are revised or updated, and as legal challenges to rules are initiated or completed, the Southern Company system's current compliance strategy estimates capital expenditures of $1.4 billion from 2019 through 2023, with annual totals of approximately $0.5 billion, $0.2 billion, $0.3 billion, $0.3 billion, and $0.2 billion for 2019, 2020, 2021, 2022, and 2023, respectively. These amounts are comprised of construction-related accounts payable outstanding at each year end. Also, the amount of non-cash property additionsestimates do not include any potential compliance costs associated with capitalized leasespending regulation of CO2 emissions from fossil fuel-fired electric generating units. See "Global Climate Issues" herein for additional information. The Southern Company system also anticipates substantial expenditures associated with ash pond closure and ground water monitoring under the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016,CCR Rule, which are reflected in Southern Company's ARO liabilities. See FINANCIAL CONDITION AND LIQUIDITY – "Capital Requirements and 2015 was $162 million, $18 million,Contractual Obligations" herein and $13 million, respectively.Note 6 to the financial statements for additional information.
Environmental Laws and Regulations
Air Quality
The EPA has set National Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS) for six air pollutants (carbon monoxide, lead, nitrogen dioxide, ozone, particulate matter, and SO2) to protect and improve the nation's air quality, which it reviews and revises periodically. Following a NAAQS revision, states are required to develop an EPA-approved plan to protect air quality. These state plans can require additional emission controls, improvements in control efficiency, or fuel changes which can result in increased compliance and operational costs. NAAQS requirements can also adversely affect the siting of new electric generating facilities. All areas within the Southern Company system's electric service territory have been designated as attainment for all NAAQS
    Table of Contents                                Index to Financial Statements

NOTESMANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS (continued)
Southern Company and Subsidiary Companies 20172018 Annual Report


Depreciationexcept for a seven-county area within metropolitan Atlanta that is not in attainment with the 2015 ozone NAAQS and Amortizationthe area surrounding Plant Hammond, in Georgia, which will not be designated attainment or nonattainment for the 2010 SO2 standard until December 2020. If areas are designated as nonattainment in the future, increased compliance costs could result. See "Regulatory Matters – Georgia Power – Integrated Resource Plan" herein for information regarding Georgia Power's request to decertify and retire Plant Hammond.
DepreciationIn 2011, the EPA finalized the Cross-State Air Pollution Rule (CSAPR) to address impacts of SO2 and NOX emissions from fossil fuel-fired electric generating plants. CSAPR establishes emissions trading programs and budgets for certain states and allocates emissions allowances for sources in those states. In 2016, the EPA published a final rule establishing more stringent ozone season NOX emissions budgets in Alabama, Mississippi, and Texas. Georgia's ozone season NOX emissions budget remained unchanged. The EPA also removed North Carolina from this particular CSAPR program. The outcome of ongoing CSAPR litigation concerning the 2016 CSAPR rule, to which Mississippi Power is a party, could have an impact on the State of Mississippi's ozone season NOX emissions budget. Increases in either future fossil fuel-fired generation or the availability or cost of CSAPR allowances could have a negative financial impact on results of operations for Southern Company.
The EPA finalized regional haze regulations in 2005 and 2017. These regulations require states, tribal governments, and various federal agencies to develop and implement plans to reduce pollutants that impair visibility and demonstrate reasonable progress toward the goal of restoring natural visibility conditions in certain areas, including national parks and wilderness areas. States must submit a revised state implementation plan (SIP) to the EPA demonstrating continued reasonable progress towards achieving visibility improvement goals. These plans could require reductions in certain pollutants, such as particulate matter, SO2, and NOX, which could result in increased compliance costs. The EPA approved the regional progress SIPs for the States of Alabama and Georgia, but only issued a limited approval of the original costregional progress SIP for the State of utility plantMississippi because Mississippi must revise the best available retrofit technology (BART) provisions of its SIP. Therefore, Mississippi Power's Plant Daniel is the only electric generating unit in servicethe Southern Company system that continues to be evaluated under the regional haze BART provisions. Mississippi Power is provided primarilyrequired to submit Plant Daniel's BART analysis to the State of Mississippi by using composite straight-line rates, which approximated 2.9% in 2017summer 2019. Requirements for further reduction of these pollutants at Plant Daniel could increase compliance costs.
Water Quality
In 2014, the EPA finalized requirements under Section 316(b) of the Clean Water Act (CWA) to regulate cooling water intake structures (CWIS) to minimize their effects on fish and 3.0% inother aquatic life at existing power plants (e.g. coal, natural gas, oil, and nuclear generating plants) and manufacturing facilities. The regulation requires plant-specific studies to determine applicable CWIS changes to protect organisms that either get caught on the intake screens (impingement) or are drawn into the cooling system (entrainment). The Southern Company system is conducting these studies and currently anticipates applicable CWIS changes may include fish-friendly CWIS screens with fish return systems and minor additions of monitoring equipment at certain plants. However, the ultimate impact of this rule will depend on the outcome of these plant-specific studies, any additional protective measures required to be incorporated into each plant's National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit based on site-specific factors, and the outcome of 2016any legal challenges.
In 2015, the EPA finalized the steam electric effluent limitations guidelines (ELG) rule (2015 ELG Rule) that set national standards for wastewater discharges from new and existing steam electric generating units generating greater than 50 MWs. The 2015. Depreciation studies are conducted periodically ELG Rule prohibits effluent discharges of certain waste streams and imposes stringent limits on flue gas desulfurization (scrubber) wastewater discharges. The revised technology-based limits and the CCR Rule require extensive changes to updateexisting ash and wastewater management systems or the composite rates. These studies are filedinstallation and operation of new ash and wastewater management systems. Compliance with the respective state PSC and/or other applicable state2015 ELG Rule is expected to require capital expenditures and federal regulatory agenciesincreased operational costs primarily for the traditional electric operating companies and natural gas distribution utilities. Accumulated depreciationcompanies' coal-fired electric generation. State environmental agencies will incorporate specific compliance applicability dates in the NPDES permitting process for utility plant in service totaled $30.8 billion and $29.3 billion at each ELG waste stream no later than December 31, 20172023. The EPA is scheduled to issue a new rulemaking by December 2019 that could revise the limitations and 2016, respectively. When property subject to composite depreciation is retired or otherwise disposedapplicability dates of two of the waste streams regulated in the normal course2015 ELG Rule. The impact of business, its original cost, together withany changes to the cost of removal, less salvage, is charged to accumulated depreciation. For other property dispositions,2015 ELG Rule will depend on the applicable cost and accumulated depreciation are removed from the balance sheet accounts, and a gain or loss is recognized. Minor items of property included in the original costcontent of the plant are retired when the related property unit is retired. Certain of Southern Power's generation assets related to natural gas-fired facilities are depreciated on a units-of-production basis, using hours or starts, to better match outage and maintenance costs to the usage of, and revenues from, these assets.
Under the terms of the 2013 ARP, Georgia Power amortized approximately $14 million annually from 2014 through 2016 of its remaining regulatory liability related to other cost of removal obligations.
See Note 3 under "Regulatory MattersGulf PowerRetail Base Rate Cases" for information regarding depreciation and amortization adjustments related to the other cost of removal regulatory liability.
Depreciation of the original cost of other plant in service is provided primarily on a straight-line basis over estimated useful lives ranging from two to 65 years. Accumulated depreciation for other plant in service totaled $673 million and $550 million at December 31, 2017 and 2016, respectively.
Asset Retirement Obligations and Other Costs of Removal
AROs are computed as the present value of the estimated ultimate costs for an asset's future retirement and are recorded in the period in which the liability is incurred. The costs are capitalized as part of the related long-lived asset and depreciated over the asset's useful life. In the absence of quoted market prices, AROs are estimated using present value techniques in which estimates of future cash outlays associated with the asset retirements are discounted using a credit-adjusted risk-free rate. Estimates of the timing and amounts of future cash outlays are based on projections of when and how the assets will be retirednew rule and the costoutcome of future removal activities. Each traditional electric operating company and natural gas distribution utility has received accounting guidance from its state PSC or applicable state regulatory agency allowing the continued accrual or recovery of other retirement costs for long-lived assets that it does not have aany legal obligation to retire. Accordingly, the accumulated removal costs for these obligations are reflected in the balance sheets as a regulatory liability and amounts to be recovered are reflected in the balance sheet as a regulatory asset.challenges.
The liability for AROs primarily relates to facilities that are subject to the Disposal of Coal Combustion Residuals from Electric Utilities final rule published byIn 2015, the EPA in 2015 (CCR Rule), principally ash ponds, and the decommissioning of the Southern Company system's nuclear facilities – Alabama Power's Plant Farley and Georgia Power's ownership interests in Plant Hatch and Plant Vogtle Units 1 and 2. In addition, the Southern Company system has retirement obligations related to various landfill sites, asbestos removal, mine reclamation, land restoration related to solar and wind facilities, and disposal of polychlorinated biphenyls in certain transformers. The Southern Company system also has identified retirement obligations related to certain electric transmission and distribution facilities, certain wireless communication towers, property associated with the Southern Company system's rail lines and natural gas pipelines, and certain structures authorized by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers. However, liabilities forEngineers (Corps) jointly published a final rule that revised the removalregulatory definition of these assets have not been recorded as the fair valuewaters of the retirement obligations cannot be reasonably estimated. A liabilityUnited States (WOTUS) for these AROsall CWA programs. The rule significantly expanded the scope of federal jurisdiction over waterbodies (such as rivers, streams, canals, and wastewater treatment ponds), which could impact new generation projects and permitting and reporting requirements associated with the installation, expansion, and maintenance of transmission, distribution, and pipeline projects. The EPA and the Corps are expected to publish a final rule in 2019 to replace the 2015 WOTUS definition. The impact of any changes to the 2015 WOTUS rule will be recognized when sufficient information becomes available to support a reasonable estimationdepend on the content of this final rule and the ARO. The Company will continue to recognize in the statementsoutcome of income allowed removal costs in accordance with regulatory treatment. Any differences between costs recognized in accordance with accounting standards related to asset retirement and environmental obligations and those reflected in rates are recognized as either a regulatory asset or liability, as ordered by the various state PSCs, and are reflected in the balance sheets. See "Nuclear Decommissioning" herein for additional information on amounts included in rates.any legal challenges.
    Table of Contents                                Index to Financial Statements

NOTESMANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS (continued)
Southern Company and Subsidiary Companies 20172018 Annual Report


Details of the AROs included in the balance sheets are as follows:
 2017 2016
 (in millions)
Balance at beginning of year$4,514
 $3,759
Liabilities incurred16
 66
Liabilities settled(177) (171)
Accretion179
 162
Cash flow revisions292
 698
Balance at end of year$4,824
 $4,514
Coal Combustion Residuals
In 20172015, the EPA finalized non-hazardous solid waste regulations for the disposal of CCR, including coal ash and 2016,gypsum, in landfills and surface impoundments (ash ponds) at active generating power plants. In addition to the increases in cash flow revisions are primarily related to changes in closure strategy forEPA's CCR Rule, the States of Alabama and Georgia have also finalized regulations regarding the handling of CCR within their respective states. The EPA's CCR Rule requires landfills and ash ponds to be evaluated against a set of performance criteria and potentially closed if minimum criteria are not met. Closure of existing landfills and gypsum cellsash ponds could require installation of equipment and infrastructure to manage CCR in accordance with the increases in liabilities settled are primarily related to ash pond closure activity.
TheCCR Rule. Based on cost estimates for AROs relatedclosure and monitoring of landfills and ash ponds pursuant to the CCR Rule, are based on information as of December 31, 2017 using various assumptions related to closure and post-closure costs, timing of future cash outlays, inflation and discount rates, and the potential methodsSouthern Company system recorded AROs for complying with theeach CCR Rule requirements for closure.unit in 2015. As further analysis iswas performed and closure details arewere developed, the traditional electric operating companies will continuehave continued to periodically update these cost estimates, as necessary.discussed further below.
The EPA published certain amendments to the CCR Rule, which became effective August 29, 2018. These amendments extend the date from April 2019 to October 31, 2020 to cease sending CCR and other waste streams to ash ponds that demonstrate compliance with all except two of the specified performance criteria.
On August 21, 2018, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit issued a decision suggesting the EPA should regulate previously-excluded inactive ash ponds located at retired generation facilities and questioning both the ability of unlined ash ponds to continue operating no matter the performance criteria results and the classification of clay-lined landfills and ash ponds. These developments could impact the expected timing of the traditional electric operating companies' landfill and ash pond closure activities, but the extent of any impact will depend on the outcome of ongoing litigation, anticipated EPA rulemaking action to establish further guidance, and the outcome of any legal challenges.
In June 2018, Alabama Power recorded an increase of approximately $1.2 billion to its AROs related to the CCR Rule. The revised cost estimates were based on information from feasibility studies performed on ash ponds in use at plants operated by Alabama Power, including at a plant jointly-owned by Mississippi Power. During the second quarter 2018, Alabama Power's management completed its analysis of these studies which indicated that additional closure costs, primarily related to increases in estimated ash volume, water management requirements, and design revisions, will be required to close these ash ponds under the planned closure-in-place methodology. As the level of work becomes more defined in the next 12 months, it is likely that these cost estimates will change and the change could be material.
In December 2018, Georgia Power recorded an increase of approximately $3.1 billion to its AROs related to the CCR Rule and the related state rule. During the second half of 2018, Georgia Power completed a strategic assessment related to its plans to close the ash ponds at all of its generating plants in compliance with the CCR Rule and the related state rule. This assessment included engineering and constructability studies related to design assumptions for ash pond closures and advanced engineering methods. The results indicated that additional closure costs will be required to close these ash ponds, primarily due to changes in closure strategies, the estimated amount of ash to be excavated, and additional water management requirements necessary to support closure strategies. These factors also impact the estimated timing of future cash outlays.
The traditional electric operating companies expect to periodically update their ARO cost estimates. Absent continued recovery of ARO costs through regulated rates, Southern Company's results of operations, cash flows, and financial condition could be materially impacted. See FINANCIAL CONDITION AND LIQUIDITY – "Capital Requirements and Contractual Obligations" herein and Note 6 to the financial statements for additional information.
The ultimate outcome of these matters cannot be determined at this time.
Nuclear Decommissioning
The NRC requires licensees of commercial nuclear power reactors to establish a plan for providing reasonable assurance of funds for future decommissioning.In June 2018, Alabama Power and Georgia Power havecompleted an updated decommissioning cost site study for Plant Farley. The estimated cost of decommissioning based on the study resulted in an increase in Alabama Power's ARO liability of approximately $300 million. Amounts previously contributed to Alabama Power's external trust funds (Funds)are currently projected to comply withbe adequate to meet the NRC's regulations. Use of the Funds is restricted to nuclearupdated decommissioning activities. The Funds are managed and invested in accordance with applicable requirements of various regulatory bodies, including the NRC, the FERC, and state PSCs, as well as the IRS. While Alabama Power andobligations.
In December 2018, Georgia Power are allowed to prescribe an overall investment policy to the Funds' managers, neither Southern Company nor its subsidiaries or affiliates are allowed to engage in the day-to-day management of the Funds or to mandate individual investment decisions. Day-to-day management of the investments in the Funds is delegated to unrelated third party managers with oversight by the management of Southern Company, Alabama Power, and Georgia Power. The Funds' managers are authorized, within certain investment guidelines, to actively buy and sell securities at their own discretion in order to maximize the return on the Funds' investments. The Funds are invested in a tax-efficient manner in a diversified mix of equity and fixed income securities and are reported as trading securities.
Southern Company records the investment securities held in the Funds at fair value, as disclosed in Note 10, as management believes that fair value best represents the nature of the Funds. Gains and losses, whether realized or unrealized, are recorded in the regulatory liability for AROs in the balance sheets and are not included in net income or OCI. Fair value adjustments and realized gains and losses are determined on a specific identification basis.
The Funds at Georgia Power participate in a securities lending program through the managers of the Funds. Under this program, the Funds' investment securities are loaned to institutional investors for a fee. Securities loaned are fully collateralized by cash, letters of credit, and/or securities issued or guaranteed by the U.S. government or its agencies or instrumentalities. As of December 31, 2017 and 2016, approximately $76 million and $56 million, respectively, of the fair market value of the Funds' securities were on loan and pledged to creditors under the Funds' managers' securities lending program. The fair value of the collateral received was approximately $77 million and $58 million at December 31, 2017 and 2016, respectively, and can only be sold by the borrower upon the return of the loaned securities. The collateral received is treated as a non-cash item in the statements of cash flows.
At December 31, 2017, investment securities in the Funds totaled $1.8 billion, consisting of equity securities of $1.1 billion, debt securities of $725 million, and $47 million of other securities. At December 31, 2016, investment securities in the Funds totaled $1.6 billion, consisting of equity securities of $878 million, debt securities of $685 million, and $41 million of other securities. These amounts include the investment securities pledged to creditors and collateral received and exclude receivables related to investment income and pending investment sales and payables related to pending investment purchases and the securities lending program.
Sales of the securities held in the Funds resulted in cash proceeds of $0.8 billion, $1.2 billion, and $1.4 billion in 2017, 2016, and 2015, respectively, all of which were reinvested. For 2017, fair value increases, including reinvested interest and dividends and excluding the Funds' expenses, were $233 million, which included $181 million related to unrealized gains on securities held in the Funds at December 31, 2017. For 2016, fair value increases, including reinvested interest and dividends and excluding the Funds' expenses, were $114 million, which included $48 million related to unrealized losses on securities held in the Funds at

NOTES (continued)
Southern Company and Subsidiary Companies 2017 Annual Report

December 31, 2016. For 2015, fair value increases, including reinvested interest and dividends and excluding the Funds' expenses, were $11 million, which included $83 million related to unrealized gains and losses on securities held in the Funds at December 31, 2015. While the investment securities held in the Funds are reported as trading securities, the Funds continue to be managed with a long-term focus. Accordingly, all purchases and sales within the Funds are presented separately in the statements of cash flows as investing cash flows, consistent with the nature of the securities and purpose for which the securities were acquired.
For Alabama Power, approximately $18 million and $19 million at December 31, 2017 and 2016, respectively, previously recorded in internal reserves is being transferred into the Funds through 2040 as approved by the Alabama PSC. The NRC's minimum external funding requirements are based on a generic estimate of the cost to decommission only the radioactive portions of a nuclear unit based on the size and type of reactor. Alabama Power and Georgia Power have filed plans with the NRC designed to ensure that, over time, the deposits and earnings of the Funds will provide the minimum funding amounts prescribed by the NRC.
At December 31, 2017 and 2016, the accumulated provisions for the external decommissioning trust funds were as follows:
 External Trust Funds
 2017 2016
 (in millions)
Plant Farley$902
 $790
Plant Hatch583
 511
Plant Vogtle Units 1 and 2346
 303
Site study cost is the estimate to decommission a specific facility as of the site study year. Thecompleted updated decommissioning cost estimates are based on prompt dismantlement and removal of the plant from service. The actual decommissioning costs may vary from these estimates because of changes in the assumed date of decommissioning, changes in NRC requirements, or changes in the assumptions used in making these estimates. The estimated costs of decommissioning as of December 31, 2017 based on the most currentsite studies which were performed in 2013 for Alabama Power's Plant Farley and in 2015 for the Georgia Power plants, were as follows for Alabama Power's Plant Farley and Georgia Power's ownership interests in Plant Hatch and Plant Vogtle Units 1 and 2:
 Plant Farley Plant Hatch 
Plant Vogtle
Units 1 and 2
Decommissioning periods:     
Beginning year2037
 2034
 2047
Completion year2076
 2075
 2079
 (in millions)
Site study costs:     
Radiated structures$1,362
 $678
 $568
Spent fuel management
 160
 147
Non-radiated structures80
 64
 89
Total site study costs$1,442
 $902
 $804
For ratemaking purposes, Alabama Power's2. The estimated cost of decommissioning costs are based on the site study, andstudies resulted in an increase in Georgia Power's decommissioning costs are based on the NRC generic estimate to decommission the radioactive portionARO liability of the facilities and the site study estimate for spent fuel management as of 2012. Under the 2013 ARP, theapproximately $130 million. Georgia PSC approved Georgia Power's annual decommissioning cost for ratemaking ofPower currently collects $4 million and $2 million annually in rates, which is used to fund external nuclear decommissioning trusts for Plant Hatch and Plant Vogtle Units 1 and 2, respectively. Georgia Power expects the Georgia PSC to review and adjust, if necessary, thethese amounts collected in rates for nuclear decommissioning costs in Georgia Power's 2019 base rate case. Significant assumptions used to determine these costs for ratemaking were an inflation rate of 4.5% and 2.4% for Alabama Power andthe Georgia Power respectively, and a trust earnings rate of 7.0% and 4.4% for Alabama Power and Georgia Power, respectively.2019 Base Rate Case.
Amounts previously contributedSee Note 6 to the Fundsfinancial statements for Plant Farley are currently projected to be adequate to meet the decommissioning obligations. Alabama Power will continue to provide site-specific estimates of the decommissioning costs and related projections of funds in the external trust to the Alabama PSC and, if necessary, would seek the Alabama PSC's approval to address any changes in a manner consistent with NRC and other applicable requirements.additional information.
    Table of Contents                                Index to Financial Statements

NOTESMANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS (continued)
Southern Company and Subsidiary Companies 20172018 Annual Report

Allowance for Funds Used During Construction and Interest Capitalized
The traditional electric operating companies and certain of the natural gas distribution utilities record AFUDC, which represents the estimated debt and equity costs of capital funds that are necessary to finance the construction of new regulated facilities. While cash is not realized currently, AFUDC increases the revenue requirement and is recovered over the service life of the plant through a higher rate base and higher depreciation. The equity component of AFUDC is not included in calculating taxable income. Interest related to the construction of new facilities not included in the traditional electric operating companies' and natural gas distribution utilities' regulated rates is capitalized in accordance with standard interest capitalization requirements. AFUDC and interest capitalized, net of income taxes, as a percentage of net income, was 25.5%, 11.4%, and 12.8% for 2017, 2016, and 2015, respectively.
Cash payments for interest totaled $1.7 billion, $1.1 billion, and $809 million in 2017, 2016, and 2015, respectively, net of amounts capitalized of $89 million, $125 million, and $124 million, respectively.
Impairment of Long-Lived Assets
Southern Company evaluates long-lived assets for impairment when events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying value of such assets may not be recoverable. The determination of whether an impairment has occurred is based on either a specific regulatory disallowance or an estimate of undiscounted future cash flows attributable to the assets, as compared with the carrying value of the assets. If an impairment has occurred, the amount of the impairment recognized is determined by either the amount of regulatory disallowance or by estimating the fair value of the assets and recording a loss if the carrying value is greater than the fair value. For assets identified as held for sale, the carrying value is compared to the estimated fair value less the cost to sell in order to determine if an impairment loss is required. Until the assets are disposed of, their estimated fair value is re-evaluated when circumstances or events change. See "Leveraged Leases" herein and Note 3 under "Other Matters" and "Kemper County Energy FacilitySchedule and Cost Estimate" for additional information.
Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets and Liabilities
Southern Company's goodwill and other intangible assets and liabilities primarily relate to Southern Company's 2016 acquisitions of PowerSecure and Southern Company Gas. See Note 12 under "Southern CompanyAcquisition of PowerSecure" and " – Merger with Southern Company Gas" for additional information. Also see Note 12 under "Southern Power" for additional information regarding other intangible assets related to Southern Power's PPA fair value adjustments.
At December 31, 2017 and 2016, goodwill was $6.3 billion. Goodwill is not amortized, but is subject to an annual impairment test during the fourth quarter of each year, or more frequently if impairment indicators arise. Southern Company evaluated its goodwill in the fourth quarter 2017 and determined that no impairment was required.

NOTES (continued)
Southern Company and Subsidiary Companies 2017 Annual Report

At December 31, 2017 and 2016, other intangible assets were as follows:
  At December 31, 2017 At December 31, 2016
 Estimated Useful LifeGross Carrying AmountAccumulated AmortizationOther
Intangible Assets, Net
 Gross Carrying AmountAccumulated AmortizationOther
Intangible Assets, Net
  (in millions) (in millions)
Other intangible assets subject to amortization:        
Customer relationships11-26 years$288
$(83)$205
 $268
$(32)$236
Trade names5-28 years159
(17)142
 158
(5)153
Storage and transportation contracts1-5 years64
(34)30
 64
(2)62
PPA fair value adjustments10-20 years456
(47)409
 456
(22)434
Other1-12 years17
(5)12
 11
(1)10
Total other intangible assets subject to amortization $984
$(186)$798

$957
$(62)$895
Other intangible assets not subject to amortization:        
Federal Communications Commission licenses 75

75
 75

75
Total other intangible assets $1,059
$(186)$873

$1,032
$(62)$970
Amortization associated with other intangible assets in 2017, 2016, and 2015 totaled $124 million, $50 million, and $3 million, respectively.
As of December 31, 2017, the estimated amortization associated with other intangible assets for the next five years is as follows:
 Amortization
 (in millions)
2018$95
201977
202065
202156
202251
Included in other deferred credits and liabilities on the balance sheet is $91 million of intangible liabilities that were recorded during acquisition accounting for transportation contracts at Southern Company Gas. At December 31, 2017, the accumulated amortization of these intangible liabilities was $50 million. The remaining estimated amortization associated with the intangible liabilities that will be recorded in natural gas revenues is as follows:
 Amortization
 (in millions)
2018$24
201917
Storm Damage Reserves
Each traditional electric operating company maintains a reserve to cover or is allowed to defer and recover the cost of damages from major storms to its transmission and distribution lines and generally the cost of uninsured damages to its generation facilities and other property. In accordance with their respective state PSC orders, the traditional electric operating companies accrued $41 million in 2017 and $40 million in each of 2016 and 2015. Alabama Power, Gulf Power, and Mississippi Power also have authority based on orders from their state PSCs to accrue certain additional amounts as circumstances warrant. In 2017, 2016, and 2015, there were no such additional accruals. See Note 3 under "Regulatory MattersAlabama PowerRate NDR" and

NOTES (continued)
Southern Company and Subsidiary Companies 2017 Annual Report

"Regulatory MattersGeorgia PowerStorm Damage Recovery" for additional information regarding Alabama Power's NDR and Georgia Power's deferred storm costs, respectively.
Leveraged Leases
A subsidiary of Southern Holdings has several leveraged lease agreements, with original terms ranging up to 45 years, which relate to international and domestic energy generation, distribution, and transportation assets. Southern Company receives federal income tax deductions for depreciation and amortization, as well as interest on long-term debt related to these investments. Southern Company reviews all important lease assumptions at least annually, or more frequently if events or changes in circumstances indicate that a change in assumptions has occurred or may occur. These assumptions include the effective tax rate, the residual value, the credit quality of the lessees, and the timing of expected tax cash flows.
The ability of the lessees to make required payments to the Southern Holdings subsidiary is dependent on the operational performance of the assets. In the last six months of 2017, the financial and operational performance of one of the lessees and the associated generation assets has raised significant concerns about the short-term ability of the generation assets to produce cash flows sufficient to support ongoing operations and the lessee's contractual obligations and its ability to make the remaining semi-annual lease payments to the Southern Holdings subsidiary beginning in June 2018. These operational challenges may also impact the expected residual value of the assets at the end of the lease term in 2047. If the June 2018 (or any future) lease payment is not paid in full, the Southern Holdings subsidiary may be unable to make its corresponding payment to the holders of the underlying non-recourse debt related to the generation assets. Failure to make the required payment to the debtholders would represent an event of default that would give the debtholders the right to foreclose on, and take ownership of, the generation assets from the Southern Holdings subsidiary, in effect terminating the lease and resulting in the write-off of the related lease receivable which had a balance of approximately $86 million as of December 31, 2017. Southern Company has evaluated the recoverability of the lease receivable and the expected residual value of the generation assets at the end of the lease under various scenarios and has concluded that its investment in the leveraged lease is not impaired as of December 31, 2017. Southern Company will continue to monitor the operational performance of the underlying assets and evaluate the ability of the lessee to continue to make the required lease payments, including the lease payment due in June 2018. The ultimate outcome of this matter cannot be determined at this time.
Southern Company's net investment in domestic and international leveraged leases consists of the following at December 31:
 2017 2016
 (in millions)
Net rentals receivable$1,498
 $1,481
Unearned income(723) (707)
Investment in leveraged leases775
 774
Deferred taxes from leveraged leases(252) (309)
Net investment in leveraged leases$523
 $465
A summary of the components of income from the leveraged leases follows:
 2017 2016 2015
 (in millions)
Pretax leveraged lease income$25
 $25
 $20
Net impact of Tax Reform Legislation48
 
 
Income tax expense(9) (9) (7)
Net leveraged lease income$64
 $16
 $13
Cash and Cash Equivalents
For purposes of the financial statements, temporary cash investments are considered cash equivalents. Temporary cash investments are securities with original maturities of 90 days or less.

NOTES (continued)
Southern Company and Subsidiary Companies 2017 Annual Report

Materials and Supplies
Generally, materials and supplies include the average cost of transmission, distribution, and generating plant materials. Materials are charged to inventory when purchased and then expensed or capitalized to plant, as appropriate, at weighted average cost when installed.
Fuel Inventory
Fuel inventory includes the average cost of coal, natural gas, oil, transportation, and emissions allowances of the electric utilities. Fuel is recorded to inventory when purchased and then expensed, at weighted average cost, as used and recovered by the traditional electric operating companies through fuel cost recovery rates approved by each state PSC. Emissions allowances granted by the EPA are included in inventory at zero cost.
Natural Gas for Sale
The natural gas distribution utilities, with the exception of Nicor Gas, carry natural gas inventory on a weighted average cost of gas (WACOG) basis.
Nicor Gas' natural gas inventory is carried at cost on a LIFO basis. Inventory decrements occurring during the year that are restored prior to year end are charged to cost of natural gas at the estimated annual replacement cost. Inventory decrements that are not restored prior to year end are charged to cost of natural gas at the actual LIFO cost of the inventory layers liquidated. The cost of natural gas, including inventory costs, is recovered from customers under a purchased gas recovery mechanism adjusted for differences between actual costs and amounts billed; therefore, LIFO liquidations have no impact on Southern Company's net income.
Natural gas inventories for Southern Company Gas' non-utility businesses are carried at the lower of weighted average cost or current market price, with cost determined on a WACOG basis. For any declines in market prices below the WACOG considered to be other than temporary, an adjustment is recorded to reduce the value of natural gas inventories to market value.
Financial Instruments
Southern Company and its subsidiaries use derivative financial instruments to limit exposure to fluctuations in interest rates, the prices of certain fuel purchases, electricity purchases and sales, and occasionally foreign currency exchange rates. All derivative financial instruments are recognized as either assets or liabilities on the balance sheets (included in "Other" or shown separately as "Risk Management Activities") and are measured at fair value. See Note 10 for additional information regarding fair value. Substantially all of the Southern Company system's bulk energy purchases and sales contracts that meet the definition of a derivative are excluded from fair value accounting requirements because they qualify for the "normal" scope exception, and are accounted for under the accrual method. Derivative contracts that qualify as cash flow hedges of anticipated transactions or are recoverable through the traditional electric operating companies' and the natural gas distribution utilities' fuel-hedging programs result in the deferral of related gains and losses in OCI or regulatory assets and liabilities, respectively, until the hedged transactions occur. Any ineffectiveness arising from cash flow hedges is recognized currently in net income. Other derivative contracts that qualify as fair value hedges are marked to market through current period income and are recorded on a net basis in the statements of income. Cash flows from derivatives are classified on the statements of cash flows in the same category as the hedged item. See Note 11 for additional information regarding derivatives.
The Company offsets fair value amounts recognized for multiple derivative instruments executed with the same counterparty under a master netting arrangement. At December 31, 2017, the amount included in accounts payable in the balance sheets that the Company has recognized for the obligation to return cash collateral arising from derivative instruments was immaterial.
Southern Company is exposed to potential losses related to financial instruments in the event of counterparties' nonperformance. The Company has established controls to determine and monitor the creditworthiness of counterparties in order to mitigate the Company's exposure to counterparty credit risk.
Comprehensive Income
The objective of comprehensive income is to report a measure of all changes in common stock equity of an enterprise that result from transactions and other economic events of the period other than transactions with owners. Comprehensive income consists of net income, changes in the fair value of qualifying cash flow hedges and marketable securities, certain changes in pension and other postretirement benefit plans, reclassifications for amounts included in net income, and dividends on preferred and preference stock of subsidiaries.

NOTES (continued)
Southern Company and Subsidiary Companies 2017 Annual Report

Accumulated OCI (loss) balances, net of tax effects, were as follows:
 
Qualifying
Hedges
 
Pension and Other
Postretirement
Benefit Plans
 
Accumulated Other
Comprehensive
Income (Loss)
 (in millions)
Balance at December 31, 2016$(115) $(65) $(180)
Current period change(4) (5) (9)
Balance at December 31, 2017$(119) $(70) $(189)
2. RETIREMENT BENEFITS
Southern Company has a defined benefit, trusteed, pension plan covering substantially all employees, with the exception of employees at Southern Company Gas and PowerSecure. This qualified pension plan is funded in accordance with requirements of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974, as amended (ERISA). No contributions to the qualified pension plan were made for the year ended December 31, 2017 and no mandatory contributions to the qualified pension plan are anticipated for the year ending December 31, 2018. Southern Company also provides certain defined benefit pension plans for a selected group of management and highly compensated employees. Benefits under these non-qualified pension plans are funded on a cash basis. In addition, Southern Company provides certain medical care and life insurance benefits for retired employees through other postretirement benefit plans. The traditional electric operating companies fund related other postretirement trusts to the extent required by their respective regulatory commissions. For the year ending December 31, 2018, no other postretirement trust contributions are expected.
In addition, Southern Company Gas has a qualified defined benefit, trusteed, pension plan covering certain eligible employees, which was closed in 2012 to new employees and reopened to all non-union employees on January 1, 2018. This qualified pension plan is funded in accordance with requirements of ERISA. No contributions to the qualified pension plan were made for the year ended December 31, 2017 and no mandatory contributions to the Southern Company Gas qualified pension plan are anticipated for the year ending December 31, 2018. Southern Company Gas also provides certain non-qualified defined benefit and defined contribution pension plans for a selected group of management and highly compensated employees. Benefits under these non-qualified pension plans are funded on a cash basis. In addition, Southern Company Gas provides certain medical care and life insurance benefits for eligible retired employees through a postretirement benefit plan. Southern Company Gas also has a separate unfunded supplemental retirement health care plan that provides medical care and life insurance benefits to employees of discontinued businesses. For the year ending December 31, 2018, no other postretirement trust contributions are expected.
Actuarial Assumptions
The weighted average rates assumed in the actuarial calculations used to determine both the net periodic costs for the pension and other postretirement benefit plans for the following year and the benefit obligations as of the measurement date are presented below.
Assumptions used to determine net periodic costs:2017 2016 2015
Pension plans     
Discount rate – benefit obligations4.40% 4.58% 4.17%
Discount rate – interest costs3.77
 3.88
 4.17
Discount rate – service costs4.81
 4.98
 4.48
Expected long-term return on plan assets7.92
 8.16
 8.20
Annual salary increase4.37
 4.37
 3.59
Other postretirement benefit plans     
Discount rate – benefit obligations4.23% 4.38% 4.04%
Discount rate – interest costs3.54
 3.66
 4.04
Discount rate – service costs4.64
 4.85
 4.39
Expected long-term return on plan assets6.84
 6.66
 6.97
Annual salary increase4.37
 4.37
 3.59

NOTES (continued)
Southern Company and Subsidiary Companies 2017 Annual Report

Assumptions used to determine benefit obligations:2017
2016
Pension plans


Discount rate3.80%
4.40%
Annual salary increase4.32

4.37
Other postretirement benefit plans


Discount rate3.68%
4.23%
Annual salary increase4.32

4.37
The Company estimates the expected rate of return on pension plan and other postretirement benefit plan assets using a financial model to project the expected return on each current investment portfolio. The analysis projects an expected rate of return on each of eight different asset classes in order to arrive at the expected return on the entire portfolio relying on each trust's target asset allocation and reasonable capital market assumptions. The financial model is based on four key inputs: anticipated returns by asset class (based in part on historical returns), each trust's target asset allocation, an anticipated inflation rate, and the projected impact of a periodic rebalancing of each trust's portfolio.
An additional assumption used in measuring the accumulated other postretirement benefit obligations (APBO) was a weighted average medical care cost trend rate. The weighted average medical care cost trend rates used in measuring the APBO as of December 31, 2017 were as follows:
 Initial Cost Trend Rate Ultimate Cost Trend Rate Year That Ultimate Rate is Reached
Pre-656.50% 4.50% 2026
Post-65 medical5.00
 4.50
 2026
Post-65 prescription10.00
 4.50
 2026
An annual increase or decrease in the assumed medical care cost trend rate of 1% would affect the APBO and the service and interest cost components at December 31, 2017 as follows:
 1 Percent
Increase
 1 Percent
Decrease
 (in millions)
Benefit obligation$132
 $113
Service and interest costs4
 3

NOTES (continued)
Southern Company and Subsidiary Companies 2017 Annual Report

Pension Plans
The total accumulated benefit obligation for the pension plans was $12.6 billion at December 31, 2017 and $11.3 billion at December 31, 2016. Changes in the projected benefit obligations and the fair value of plan assets during the plan years ended December 31, 2017 and 2016 were as follows:
 2017 2016
 (in millions)
Change in benefit obligation   
Benefit obligation at beginning of year$12,385
 $10,542
Acquisitions
 1,244
Service cost293
 262
Interest cost455
 422
Benefits paid(596) (466)
Plan amendments(26) 39
Actuarial (gain) loss1,297
 342
Balance at end of year13,808
 12,385
Change in plan assets   
Fair value of plan assets at beginning of year11,583
 9,234
Acquisitions
 837
Actual return (loss) on plan assets1,953
 902
Employer contributions52
 1,076
Benefits paid(596) (466)
Fair value of plan assets at end of year12,992
 11,583
Accrued liability$(816) $(802)
At December 31, 2017, the projected benefit obligations for the qualified and non-qualified pension plans were $13.2 billion and $652 million, respectively. All pension plan assets are related to the qualified pension plans.
Amounts presented in the following tables exclude regulatory assets of $334 million associated with unamortized amounts in Southern Company Gas' pension plans prior to its acquisition by Southern Company on July 1, 2016.
Amounts recognized in the balance sheets at December 31, 2017 and 2016 related to the Company's pension plans consist of the following:
 2017 2016
 (in millions)
Other regulatory assets, deferred$3,273
 $3,207
Other current liabilities(53) (53)
Employee benefit obligations(763) (749)
Other regulatory liabilities, deferred(118) (87)
Accumulated OCI107
 100

NOTES (continued)
Southern Company and Subsidiary Companies 2017 Annual Report

Presented below are the amounts included in accumulated OCI and regulatory assets at December 31, 2017 and 2016 related to the defined benefit pension plans that had not yet been recognized in net periodic pension cost along with the estimated amortization of such amounts for 2018.
 
Prior
Service
Cost
 Net (Gain) Loss
 (in millions)
Balance at December 31, 2017:   
Accumulated OCI$3
 $104
Regulatory assets14
 3,140
Total$17
 $3,244
Balance at December 31, 2016:   
Accumulated OCI$4
 $96
Regulatory assets51
 3,069
Total$55
 $3,165
Estimated amortization in net periodic pension cost in 2018:   
Accumulated OCI$1
 $9
Regulatory assets4
 204
Total$5
 $213
The components of OCI and the changes in the balance of regulatory assets related to the defined benefit pension plans for the years ended December 31, 2017 and 2016 are presented in the following table:
 
Accumulated
OCI
 Regulatory Assets
 (in millions)
Balance at December 31, 2015$125
 $2,998
Net (gain) loss(20) 243
Change in prior service costs2
 37
Reclassification adjustments:   
Amortization of prior service costs(1) (13)
Amortization of net gain (loss)(6) (145)
Total reclassification adjustments(7) (158)
Total change(25) 122
Balance at December 31, 2016$100
 $3,120
Net (gain) loss15
 227
Change in prior service costs
 (26)
Reclassification adjustments:   
Amortization of prior service costs(1) (11)
Amortization of net gain (loss)(7) (155)
Total reclassification adjustments(8) (166)
Total change7
 35
Balance at December 31, 2017$107
 $3,155

NOTES (continued)
Southern Company and Subsidiary Companies 2017 Annual Report

Components of net periodic pension cost were as follows:
 2017 2016 2015
 (in millions)
Service cost$293
 $262
 $257
Interest cost455
 422
 445
Expected return on plan assets(897) (782) (724)
Recognized net (gain) loss162
 150
 215
Net amortization12
 14
 25
Net periodic pension cost$25
 $66
 $218
Net periodic pension cost is the sum of service cost, interest cost, and other costs netted against the expected return on plan assets. The expected return on plan assets is determined by multiplying the expected rate of return on plan assets and the market-related value of plan assets. In determining the market-related value of plan assets, the Company has elected to amortize changes in the market value of all plan assets over five years rather than recognize the changes immediately. As a result, the accounting value of plan assets that is used to calculate the expected return on plan assets differs from the current fair value of the plan assets.
Future benefit payments reflect expected future service and are estimated based on assumptions used to measure the projected benefit obligation for the pension plans. At December 31, 2017, estimated benefit payments were as follows:
 
Benefit
Payments
 (in millions)
2018$634
2019637
2020663
2021681
2022704
2023 to 20273,836

NOTES (continued)
Southern Company and Subsidiary Companies 2017 Annual Report

Other Postretirement Benefits
Changes in the APBO and in the fair value of plan assets during the plan years ended December 31, 2017 and 2016 were as follows:
 2017 2016
 (in millions)
Change in benefit obligation   
Benefit obligation at beginning of year$2,297
 $1,989
Acquisitions
 338
Service cost24
 22
Interest cost79
 76
Benefits paid(136) (119)
Actuarial (gain) loss65
 (16)
Plan amendments3
 
Retiree drug subsidy7
 7
Balance at end of year2,339
 2,297
Change in plan assets   
Fair value of plan assets at beginning of year944
 833
Acquisitions
 100
Actual return (loss) on plan assets154
 58
Employer contributions84
 65
Benefits paid(129) (112)
Fair value of plan assets at end of year1,053
 944
Accrued liability$(1,286) $(1,353)
Amounts presented in the following tables exclude regulatory assets of $77 million associated with unamortized amounts in Southern Company Gas' other postretirement benefit plans prior to its acquisition by Southern Company on July 1, 2016.
Amounts recognized in the balance sheets at December 31, 2017 and 2016 related to the Company's other postretirement benefit plans consist of the following:
 2017 2016
 (in millions)
Other regulatory assets, deferred$382
 $419
Other current liabilities(5) (4)
Employee benefit obligations(1,281) (1,349)
Other regulatory liabilities, deferred(41) (41)
Accumulated OCI4
 7

NOTES (continued)
Southern Company and Subsidiary Companies 2017 Annual Report

Presented below are the amounts included in accumulated OCI and net regulatory assets (liabilities) at December 31, 2017 and 2016 related to the other postretirement benefit plans that had not yet been recognized in net periodic other postretirement benefit cost along with the estimated amortization of such amounts for 2018.
 
Prior
Service
Cost
 
Net (Gain)
Loss
 (in millions)
Balance at December 31, 2017:   
Accumulated OCI$
 $4
Net regulatory assets21
 320
Total$21
 $324
Balance at December 31, 2016:   
Accumulated OCI$
 $7
Net regulatory assets25
 353
Total$25
 $360
Estimated amortization as net periodic postretirement benefit cost in 2018:   
Net regulatory assets$7
 $14
The components of OCI, along with the changes in the balance of net regulatory assets (liabilities), related to the other postretirement benefit plans for the plan years ended December 31, 2017 and 2016 are presented in the following table:
 
Accumulated
OCI
 
Net Regulatory
Assets
(Liabilities)
 (in millions)
Balance at December 31, 2015$8
 $411
Net (gain) loss(1) (13)
Reclassification adjustments:   
Amortization of prior service costs
 (6)
Amortization of net gain (loss)
 (14)
Total reclassification adjustments
 (20)
Total change(1) (33)
Balance at December 31, 2016$7
 $378
Net (gain) loss(3) (21)
Change in prior service costs
 3
Reclassification adjustments:   
Amortization of prior service costs
 (6)
Amortization of net gain (loss)
 (13)
Total reclassification adjustments
 (19)
Total change(3) (37)
Balance at December 31, 2017$4
 $341

NOTES (continued)
Southern Company and Subsidiary Companies 2017 Annual Report

Components of the other postretirement benefit plans' net periodic cost were as follows:
 2017 2016 2015
 (in millions)
Service cost$24
 $22
 $23
Interest cost79
 76
 78
Expected return on plan assets(66) (60) (58)
Net amortization20
 21
 21
Net periodic postretirement benefit cost$57
 $59
 $64
Future benefit payments, including prescription drug benefits, reflect expected future service and are estimated based on assumptions used to measure the APBO for the other postretirement benefit plans. Estimated benefit payments are reduced by drug subsidy receipts expected as a result of the Medicare Prescription Drug, Improvement, and Modernization Act of 2003 as follows:
 
Benefit
Payments
 
Subsidy
Receipts
 Total
 (in millions)
2018$144
 $(7) $137
2019148
 (8) 140
2020151
 (8) 143
2021154
 (9) 145
2022156
 (9) 147
2023 to 2027780
 (48) 732
Benefit Plan Assets
Pension plan and other postretirement benefit plan assets are managed and invested in accordance with all applicable requirements, including ERISA and the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (Internal Revenue Code). The Company's investment policies for both the pension plans and the other postretirement benefit plans cover a diversified mix of assets as described below. Derivative instruments may be used to gain efficient exposure to the various asset classes and as hedging tools. Additionally, the Company minimizes the risk of large losses primarily through diversification but also monitors and manages other aspects of risk.
The investment strategy for plan assets related to the Company's qualified pension plans is to be broadly diversified across major asset classes. The asset allocation is established after consideration of various factors that affect the assets and liabilities of the pension plan including, but not limited to, historical and expected returns and interest rates, volatility, correlations of asset classes, the current level of assets and liabilities, and the assumed growth in assets and liabilities. Because a significant portion of the liability of the pension plans is long-term in nature, the assets are invested consistent with long-term investment expectations for return and risk. To manage the actual asset class exposures relative to the target asset allocation, the Southern Company plan employs a formal rebalancing program. As additional risk management, external investment managers and service providers are subject to written guidelines to ensure appropriate and prudent investment practices. Management believes the portfolio is well-diversified with no significant concentrations of risk.

NOTES (continued)
Southern Company and Subsidiary Companies 2017 Annual Report

Investment Strategies and Benefit Plan Asset Fair Values
A description of the major asset classes that the pension and other postretirement benefit plans are comprised of, along with the valuation methods used for fair value measurement, is provided below:
DescriptionValuation Methodology
Domestic equity: A mix of large and small capitalization stocks with generally an equal distribution of value and growth attributes, managed both actively and through passive index approaches.

International equity: A mix of growth stocks and value stocks with both developed and emerging market exposure, managed both actively and through passive index approaches.
Domestic and International equities such as common stocks, American depositary receipts, and real estate investment trusts that trade on public exchanges are classified as Level 1 investments and are valued at the closing price in the active market. Equity funds with unpublished prices are valued as Level 2 when the underlying holdings are comprised of Level 1 or Level 2 equity securities.
Fixed income: A mix of domestic and international bonds.
Investments in fixed income securities are generally classified as Level 2 investments and are valued based on prices reported in the market place. Additionally, the value of fixed income securities takes into consideration certain items such as broker quotes, spreads, yield curves, interest rates, and discount rates that apply to the term of a specific instrument.
Trust-owned life insurance (TOLI): Investments of the Company's taxable trusts aimed at minimizing the impact of taxes on the portfolio.
Investments in TOLI policies are classified as Level 2 investments and are valued based on the underlying investments held in the policy's separate accounts. The underlying assets are equity and fixed income pooled funds that are comprised of Level 1 and Level 2 securities.
Special situations: Investments in opportunistic strategies with the objective of diversifying and enhancing returns and exploiting short-term inefficiencies, as well as investments in promising new strategies of a longer-term nature.

Real estate: Investments in traditional private market, equity-oriented investments in real properties (indirectly through pooled funds or partnerships) and in publicly traded real estate securities.

Private equity: Investments in private partnerships that invest in private or public securities typically through privately-negotiated and/or structured transactions, including leveraged buyouts, venture capital, and distressed debt.
Investments in real estate, private equity, and special situations are generally classified as Net Asset Value as a Practical Expedient, since the underlying assets typically do not have publicly available observable inputs. The fund manager values the assets using various inputs and techniques depending on the nature of the underlying investments. Techniques may include purchase multiples for comparable transactions, comparable public company trading multiples, discounted cash flow analysis, prevailing market capitalization rates, recent sales of comparable investments, and independent third-party appraisals. The fair value of partnerships is determined by aggregating the value of the underlying assets less liabilities.
The fair values, and actual allocations relative to the target allocations, of Southern Company's pension plan (excluding Southern Company Gas) as of December 31, 2017 and 2016 are presented below. The fair values presented are prepared in accordance with GAAP. For purposes of determining the fair value of the pension plan and other postretirement benefit plan assets and the appropriate level designation, management relies on information provided by the plan's trustee. This information is reviewed and evaluated by management with changes made to the trustee information as appropriate.

NOTES (continued)
Southern Company and Subsidiary Companies 2017 Annual Report

These fair values exclude cash, receivables related to investment income and pending investment sales, and payables related to pending investment purchases.
 Fair Value Measurements Using   
 Quoted Prices in Active Markets for Identical Assets
Significant
Other
Observable
Inputs
Significant
Unobservable
Inputs
Net Asset Value as a Practical Expedient Target AllocationActual Allocation
As of December 31, 2017:(Level 1)(Level 2)(Level 3)(NAV)Total
 (in millions)  
Assets:       
Domestic equity(*)
$2,405
$1,159
$
$
$3,564
26%31%
International equity(*)
1,555
1,403


2,958
25
25
Fixed income:     23
24
U.S. Treasury, government, and agency bonds
841


841


Mortgage- and asset-backed securities
8


8


Corporate bonds
1,201


1,201


Pooled funds
650


650


Cash equivalents and other217
11


228


Real estate investments469


1,188
1,657
14
13
Special situations


180
180
3
1
Private equity


669
669
9
6
Total$4,646
$5,273
$
$2,037
$11,956
100%100%
(*)Level 1 securities consist of actively traded stocks while Level 2 securities consist of pooled funds.

NOTES (continued)
Southern Company and Subsidiary Companies 2017 Annual Report

 Fair Value Measurements Using   
 Quoted Prices in Active Markets for Identical Assets
Significant
Other
Observable
Inputs
Significant
Unobservable
Inputs
Net Asset Value as a Practical Expedient Target AllocationActual Allocation
As of December 31, 2016:(Level 1)(Level 2)(Level 3)(NAV)Total
 (in millions)  
Assets:       
Domestic equity(*)
$2,010
$927
$
$
$2,937
26%29%
International equity(*)
1,231
1,110


2,341
25
22
Fixed income:     23
29
U.S. Treasury, government, and agency bonds
588


588


Mortgage- and asset-backed securities
13


13


Corporate bonds
991


991


Pooled funds
524


524


Cash equivalents and other996
2


998


Real estate investments310


1,152
1,462
14
13
Special situations



180
180
3
2
Private equity


549
549
9
5
Total$4,547
$4,155
$
$1,881
$10,583
100%100%
(*)Level 1 securities consist of actively traded stocks while Level 2 securities consist of pooled funds.
The fair values of Southern Company Gas' pension plan assets for the period ended December 31, 2017 and 2016 are presented below. The fair value measurements exclude cash, receivables related to investment income, pending investment sales, and payables related to pending investment purchases. Special situations (absolute return and hedge funds) investment assets are presented in the tables below based on the nature of the investment.
 Fair Value Measurements Using 
 Quoted Prices in Active Markets for Identical AssetsSignificant
Other
Observable
Inputs
Significant
Unobservable
Inputs
Net Asset Value as a Practical Expedient 
As of December 31, 2017:(Level 1)(Level 2)(Level 3)(NAV)Total
 (in millions)
Assets:     
Domestic equity(*)
$155
$323
$
$
$478
International equity(*)

166


166
Fixed income:     
U.S. Treasury, government, and agency bonds
85


85
Corporate bonds
39


39
Cash equivalents and other84
25

48
157
Real estate investments3


16
19
Private equity


1
1
Total$242
$638
$
$65
$945
(*)Level 1 securities consist of actively traded stocks while Level 2 securities consist of pooled funds.

NOTES (continued)
Southern Company and Subsidiary Companies 2017 Annual Report

 Fair Value Measurements Using 
 Quoted Prices in Active Markets for Identical AssetsSignificant
Other
Observable
Inputs
Significant
Unobservable
Inputs
Net Asset Value as a Practical Expedient 
As of December 31, 2016:(Level 1)(Level 2)(Level 3)(NAV)Total
 (in millions)
Assets:     
Domestic equity(*)
$142
$343
$
$
$485
International equity(*)

185


185
Fixed income:




U.S. Treasury, government, and agency bonds
85


85
Corporate bonds
41


41
Pooled funds
66


66
Cash equivalents and other12
5

83
100
Real estate investments4


15
19
Private equity


2
2
Total$158
$725
$
$100
$983
(*)Level 1 securities consist of actively traded stocks while Level 2 securities consist of pooled funds.
The composition of Southern Company Gas' pension plan assets as of December 31, 2017 and 2016, along with the targets, is presented below:
  Target 2017 2016
Pension plan assets:      
Equity 53% 65% 69%
Fixed Income 15
 19
 20
Cash 2
 6
 1
Other 30
 10
 10
Balance at end of period 100% 100% 100%

NOTES (continued)
Southern Company and Subsidiary Companies 2017 Annual Report

The fair values of Southern Company's (excluding Southern Company Gas) other postretirement benefit plan assets as of December 31, 2017 and 2016 are presented below. These fair value measurements exclude cash, receivables related to investment income, pending investment sales, and payables related to pending investment purchases.
 Fair Value Measurements Using   
 Quoted Prices in Active Markets for Identical Assets
Significant
Other
Observable
Inputs
Significant
Unobservable
Inputs
Net Asset Value as a Practical ExpedientTotalTarget AllocationActual Allocation
As of December 31, 2017:(Level 1)(Level 2)(Level 3)(NAV)
 (in millions)  
Assets:       
Domestic equity(*)
$132
$35
$
$
$167
37%40%
International equity(*)
47
76


123
23
23
Fixed income:     30
29
U.S. Treasury, government,
and agency bonds

32


32


Corporate bonds
37


37


Pooled funds
55


55


Cash equivalents and other10



10


Trust-owned life insurance
426


426


Real estate investments16


36
52
5
5
Special situations


5
5
1
1
Private equity


20
20
4
2
Total$205
$661
$
$61
$927
100%100%
(*)Level 1 securities consist of actively traded stocks while Level 2 securities consist of pooled funds.

NOTES (continued)
Southern Company and Subsidiary Companies 2017 Annual Report

 Fair Value Measurements Using   
 Quoted Prices in Active Markets for Identical Assets
Significant
Other
Observable
Inputs
Significant
Unobservable
Inputs
Net Asset Value as a Practical Expedient Target AllocationActual Allocation
As of December 31, 2016:(Level 1)(Level 2)(Level 3)(NAV)Total
 (in millions)  
Assets:       
Domestic equity(*)
$118
$28
$
$
$146
39%40%
International equity(*)
37
61


98
23
21
Fixed income:     29
31
U.S. Treasury, government, and agency bonds
24


24


Corporate bonds
30


30


Pooled funds
49


49


Cash equivalents and other41



41


Trust-owned life insurance
382


382


Real estate investments11


35
46
5
5
Special situations


5
5
1
1
Private equity


17
17
3
2
Total$207
$574
$
$57
$838
100%100%
(*)Level 1 securities consist of actively traded stocks while Level 2 securities consist of pooled funds.
The fair values of Southern Company Gas' other postretirement benefit plan assets for the period ended December 31, 2017 and 2016 are presented below. These fair value measurements exclude cash, receivables related to investment income, pending investment sales, and payables related to pending investment purchases. Special situations (absolute return and hedge funds) investment assets are presented in the tables below based on the nature of the investment.
 Fair Value Measurements Using 
 Quoted Prices in Active Markets for Identical AssetsSignificant
Other
Observable
Inputs
Significant
Unobservable
Inputs
Net Asset Value as a Practical ExpedientTotal
As of December 31, 2017:(Level 1)(Level 2)(Level 3)(NAV)
 (in millions)
Assets:     
Domestic equity(*)
$3
$69
$
$
$72
International equity(*)

22


22
Fixed income:    

Pooled funds
24


24
Cash equivalents and other2


1
3
Total$5
$115
$
$1
$121
(*)Level 1 securities consist of actively traded stocks while Level 2 securities consist of pooled funds.

NOTES (continued)
Southern Company and Subsidiary Companies 2017 Annual Report

 Fair Value Measurements Using 
 Quoted Prices in Active Markets for Identical AssetsSignificant
Other
Observable
Inputs
Significant
Unobservable
Inputs
Net Asset Value as a Practical ExpedientTotal
As of December 31, 2016:(Level 1)(Level 2)(Level 3)(NAV)
 (in millions)
Assets:     
Domestic equity(*)
$3
$58
$
$
$61
International equity(*)

18


18
Fixed income:     
Pooled funds
23


23
Cash equivalents and other1


2
3
Total$4
$99
$
$2
$105
(*)Level 1 securities consist of actively traded stocks while Level 2 securities consist of pooled funds.
The composition of Southern Company Gas' other postretirement benefit plan assets as of December 31, 2017 and 2016, along with the targets, is presented below:
  Target 2017 2016
Other postretirement benefit plan assets:      
Equity 72% 76% 74%
Fixed Income 24
 20
 23
Cash 1
 2
 1
Other 3
 2
 2
Total 100% 100% 100%
Employee Savings Plan
Southern Company and its subsidiaries also sponsor 401(k) defined contribution plans covering substantially all employees and provide matching contributions up to specified percentages of an employee's eligible pay. Total matching contributions made to the plans for 2017, 2016, and 2015 were $118 million, $105 million, and $92 million, respectively.
3. CONTINGENCIES AND REGULATORY MATTERS
General Litigation Matters
On January 20, 2017, a purported securities class action complaint was filed against Southern Company, certain of its officers, and certain former Mississippi Power officers in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Georgia, Atlanta Division, by Monroe County Employees' Retirement System on behalf of all persons who purchased shares of Southern Company's common stock between April 25, 2012 and October 29, 2013. The complaint alleges that Southern Company, certain of its officers, and certain former Mississippi Power officers made materially false and misleading statements regarding the Kemper County energy facility in violation of certain provisions under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. The complaint seeks, among other things, compensatory damages and litigation costs and attorneys' fees. On June 12, 2017, the plaintiffs filed an amended complaint that provided additional detail about their claims, increased the purported class period by one day, and added certain other former Mississippi Power officers as defendants. On July 27, 2017, the defendants filed a motion to dismiss the plaintiffs' amended complaint with prejudice, to which the plaintiffs filed an opposition on September 11, 2017.
On February 27, 2017, Jean Vineyard filed a shareholder derivative lawsuit in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Georgia that names as defendants Southern Company, certain of its directors, certain of its officers, and certain former Mississippi Power officers. The complaint alleges that the defendants caused Southern Company to make false or misleading statements regarding the Kemper County energy facility cost and schedule. Further, the complaint alleges that the defendants were unjustly enriched and caused the waste of corporate assets. The plaintiff seeks to recover, on behalf of Southern Company, unspecified actual damages and, on her own behalf, attorneys' fees and costs in bringing the lawsuit. The plaintiff also seeks certain changes

NOTES (continued)
Southern Company and Subsidiary Companies 2017 Annual Report

to Southern Company's corporate governance and internal processes. On March 27, 2017, the court deferred this lawsuit until 30 days after certain further action in the purported securities class action complaint discussed above.
On May 15, 2017, Helen E. Piper Survivor's Trust filed a shareholder derivative lawsuit in the Superior Court of Gwinnett County, State of Georgia and, on May 31, 2017, Judy Mesirov filed a shareholder derivative lawsuit in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Georgia. Each of these lawsuits names as defendants Southern Company, certain of its directors, certain of its officers, and certain former Mississippi Power officers. Each complaint alleges that the individual defendants, among other things, breached their fiduciary duties in connection with schedule delays and cost overruns associated with the construction of the Kemper County energy facility. Each complaint further alleges that the individual defendants authorized or failed to correct false and misleading statements regarding the Kemper County energy facility schedule and cost and failed to implement necessary internal controls to prevent harm to Southern Company. Each plaintiff seeks to recover, on behalf of Southern Company, unspecified actual damages and disgorgement of profits and, on its behalf, attorneys' fees and costs in bringing the lawsuit. Each plaintiff also seeks certain unspecified changes to Southern Company's corporate governance and internal processes. On August 15, 2017, these two shareholder derivative lawsuits were consolidated in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Georgia and the court deferred the consolidated case until 30 days after certain further action in the purported securities class action complaint discussed above.
Southern Company believes these legal challenges have no merit; however, an adverse outcome in any of these proceedings could have an impact on Southern Company's results of operations, financial condition, and liquidity. Southern Company will vigorously defend itself in these matters, the ultimate outcome of which cannot be determined at this time.
Southern Company and its subsidiaries are subject to certain claims and legal actions arising in the ordinary course of business. In addition, the business activities of Southern Company's subsidiaries are subject to extensive governmental regulation related to public health and the environment, such as regulation of air emissions and water discharges. Litigation over environmental issues and claims of various types, including property damage, personal injury, common law nuisance, and citizen enforcement of environmental requirements such as standards for air, water, land, and protection of other natural resources, has occurred throughout the U.S. This litigation has included claims for damages alleged to have been caused by CO2 and other emissions, CCR, and alleged exposure to hazardous materials, and/or requests for injunctive relief in connection with such matters. The ultimate outcome of such pending or potential litigation against Southern Company and its subsidiaries cannot be predicted at this time; however, for current proceedings not specifically reported herein, management does not anticipate that the ultimate liabilities, if any, arising from such current proceedings would have a material effect on Southern Company's financial statements.
Environmental Matters
Environmental Remediation
The Southern Company system must comply with environmental laws and regulations governing the handling and disposal of waste and releases of hazardous substances. Under these various laws and regulations, the Southern Company system could incur substantial costs to clean up affected sites. The traditional electric operating companies and the natural gas distribution utilities conduct studies to determine the extent of any required cleanup and haveSouthern Company has recognized the estimated costs to clean up known impacted sites in theits financial statements. A liabilityAmounts for environmental remediationcleanup and ongoing monitoring costs is recognized only when a loss is determined to be probable and reasonably estimable.were not material for any year presented. The traditional electric operating companies and the natural gas distribution utilities in Illinois New Jersey,and Georgia and Florida have all received authority from their respective state PSCs or other applicable state regulatory agencies to recover approved environmental compliance costs through regulatory mechanisms. These regulatory mechanisms are adjusted annually or as necessary within limits approved by the state PSCs or other applicable state regulatory agencies. The traditional electric operating companies and Southern Company Gas may be liable for some or all required cleanup costs for additional sites that may require environmental remediation. See Note 3 to the financial statements under "Environmental Remediation" for additional information.
Global Climate Issues
On August 31, 2018, the EPA published a proposed rule known as the Affordable Clean Energy (ACE) Rule, which is intended to replace a regulation enacted in 2015 known as the Clean Power Plan (CPP), that would limit CO2 emissions from existing fossil fuel-fired electric generating units. The CPP has been stayed by the U.S. Supreme Court since 2016. The ACE Rule would require states to develop GHG unit-specific emission rate standards based on heat-rate efficiency improvements for existing fossil fuel-fired steam units. As proposed, combustion turbines, including natural gas combined cycles, are not affected sources. As of January 1, 2019, the Southern Company system has ownership interests in 40 fossil fuel-fired steam units to which the proposed ACE Rule is applicable. The ultimate impact of this rule to the Southern Company system is currently unknown and will depend on changes between the proposal and the final rule, subsequent state plan developments and requirements, and any associated legal challenges.
On December 20, 2018, the EPA published a proposed review of the Standards of Performance for Greenhouse Gas Emissions from New, Modified, and Reconstructed Stationary Sources: Electric Utility Generating Units final rule (2015 NSPS rule). The EPA's final 2015 NSPS rule set standards of performance for new, modified, and reconstructed electric utility generating units which included stationary combustion turbines and fossil-fired steam boilers. This proposal reduces the stringency of the 2015 NSPS rule by not basing the new and reconstructed fossil-fired steam boiler and IGCC standards on partial carbon capture and sequestration. The impact of any changes to this rule will depend on the content of the final rule and the outcome of any legal challenges.
Additional domestic GHG policies may emerge in the future requiring the United States to transition to a lower GHG emitting economy. The Southern Company system has transitioned from an electric generating mix of 70% coal and 15% natural gas in 2007 to a mix of 30% coal and 46% natural gas in 2018, along with over 8,000 MWs of renewable resources. This transition has been supported in part by the Southern Company system retiring 4,226 MWs of coal- and oil-fired generating capacity since 2010 and converting 3,280 MWs of generating capacity from coal to natural gas since 2015. In addition, Southern Company Gas has replaced approximately 5,600 miles of bare steel and cast-iron pipe, resulting in removal of approximately 2.5 million metric tons of GHG from its natural gas distribution system since 1998. Based on ownership or financial control of facilities, the Southern Company system's 2017 GHG emissions (CO2 equivalent) were approximately 98 million metric tons, with 2018 emissions estimated at 98 million metric tons. This equates to a reduction of 36% between 2007 and 2018. The 2018 estimates include GHG emissions attributable to each of Elizabethtown Gas, Elkton Gas, Florida City Gas, and the Florida Plants through the date of the applicable disposition. See Note 15 to the financial statements for additional information regarding disposition activities.
In April 2018, Southern Company established an intermediate goal of a 50% reduction in carbon emissions from 2007 levels by 2030 and a long-term goal of low- to no-carbon operations by 2050. To achieve these goals, the Southern Company system expects to continue growing its renewable energy portfolio, optimize technology advancements to modernize its transmission and distribution systems, increase the use of natural gas for generation, complete ongoing construction projects, including Georgia Power's environmental remediation liability asinterest in Plant Vogtle Units 3 and 4, invest in energy efficiency, and continue research and development efforts focused on technologies to lower GHG emissions. The Southern Company system's ability to achieve these goals also will be dependent on many external factors, including supportive national energy policies, low natural gas prices, and the development, deployment, and advancement of December 31, 2017 and 2016 was $22 million and $17 million, respectively. Georgia Power has been designated or identified as a potentially responsible party at sites governed by the Georgia Hazardous Site Response Act and/or by the federal Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act, and assessment and potential cleanup of such sites is expected.
Gulf Power's environmental remediation liability includes estimated costs of environmental remediation projects of approximately $52 million and $44 million as of December 31, 2017 and 2016, respectively. These estimated costs primarily relate to site closure criteria by the Florida Department of Environmental Protection (FDEP) for potential impacts to soil and groundwater from herbicide applications at Gulf Power's substations. The schedule for completion of the remediation projects is subject to FDEP approval. The projects have been approved by the Florida PSC for recovery through Gulf Power's environmental cost recovery clause; therefore, these liabilities have no impact on net income.relevant energy technologies.
    Table of Contents                                Index to Financial Statements

NOTESMANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS (continued)
Southern Company and Subsidiary Companies 20172018 Annual Report


Southern Company Gas' environmental remediation liabilityFERC Matters
Open Access Transmission Tariff
On May 10, 2018, AMEA and Cooperative Energy filed with the FERC a complaint against SCS and the traditional electric operating companies claiming that the current 11.25% base ROE used in calculating the annual transmission revenue requirements of the traditional electric operating companies' open access transmission tariff is unjust and unreasonable as of December 31, 2017 and 2016 was $388 million and $426 million, respectively, based on the estimated cost of environmental investigation and remediation associated with known current and former manufactured gas plant operating sites. These environmental remediation expenditures are recoverable from customers through rate mechanisms approvedmeasured by the applicable state regulatory agenciesFERC standards. The complaint requested that the base ROE be set no higher than 8.65% and that the FERC order refunds for the difference in revenue requirements that results from applying a just and reasonable ROE established in this proceeding upon determining the current ROE is unjust and unreasonable. On June 18, 2018, SCS and the traditional electric operating companies filed their response challenging the adequacy of the natural gas distribution utilities, withshowing presented by the exceptioncomplainants and offering support for the current ROE. On September 6, 2018, the FERC issued an order establishing a refund effective date of one site representing $2 millionMay 10, 2018 in the event a refund is due and initiating an investigation and settlement procedures regarding the current base ROE. Through December 31, 2018, the estimated maximum potential refund is not expected to be material to Southern Company's results of the total accrued remediation costs.
operations or cash flows. The ultimate outcome of these mattersthis matter cannot be determined at this time; however, astime.
Southern Company Gas
Southern Company Gas' gas pipeline investments business is involved in two significant pipeline construction projects, the Atlantic Coast Pipeline (5% ownership) and the PennEast Pipeline (20% ownership), which received FERC approval in October 2017 and January 2018, respectively. Southern Company Gas' total capital expenditures, excluding AFUDC, at completion are expected to be between $350 million and $390 million for the Atlantic Coast Pipeline and $276 million for the PennEast Pipeline. These projects, along with Southern Company Gas' existing pipelines, are intended to provide diverse sources of natural gas supplies to customers, resolve current and long-term supply planning for new capacity, enhance system reliability, and generate economic development in the areas served.
Work continues with state and federal agencies to obtain the required permits to begin construction on the PennEast Pipeline. Any material delays may impact forecasted capital expenditures and the expected in-service date.
The Atlantic Coast Pipeline has experienced challenges to its permits since construction began in 2018. During the third and fourth quarters 2018, a FERC stop work order, together with delays in obtaining permits necessary for construction and construction delays due to judicial actions, impacted the cost and schedule for the project. As a result, total project cost estimates have increased from between $6.0 billion and $6.5 billion to between $7.0 billion and $7.8 billion, excluding financing costs. Southern Company Gas' share of the total project costs is 5% and Southern Company Gas' investment at December 31, 2018 totaled $83 million. The operator of the joint venture currently expects to achieve a late 2020 in-service date for at least key segments of the Atlantic Coast Pipeline, while the remainder may extend into early 2021. Southern Company Gas has evaluated the recoverability of its investment and determined there was no impairment as of December 31, 2018. Abnormal weather, work delays (including due to judicial or regulatory treatment for environmental remediation expenses described above, the final dispositionaction), and other conditions may result in additional cost or schedule modifications, which could result in an impairment of these matters is not expected toSouthern Company Gas' investment and could have a material impact on Southern Company's financial statements.
Nuclear Fuel Disposal Costs
Acting through the DOE and pursuant to the Nuclear Waste Policy Act of 1982, the U.S. government entered into contracts with Alabama Power and Georgia Power that require the DOE to dispose of spent nuclear fuel and high level radioactive waste generated at Plants Hatch and Farley and Plant Vogtle Units 1 and 2 beginning no later than January 31, 1998. The DOE has yet to commence the performance of its contractual and statutory obligation to dispose of spent nuclear fuel. Consequently, Alabama Power and Georgia Power pursued and continue to pursue legal remedies against the U.S. government for its partial breach of contract.
In 2014, the Court of Federal Claims entered a judgment in favor of Georgia Power and Alabama Power in their spent nuclear fuel lawsuit seeking damages for the period from January 1, 2005 through December 31, 2010. In 2015, Georgia Power recovered approximately $18 million, based on its ownership interests, which was credited to accounts where the original costs were charged, and used to reduce rate base, fuel, and cost of service for the benefit of customers. Also in 2015, Alabama Power recovered approximately $26 million, which was applied to reduce the cost of service for the benefit of customers.
In 2014, Alabama Power and Georgia Power filed lawsuits against the U.S. government for the costs of continuing to store spent nuclear fuel at Plants Farley and Hatch and Plant Vogtle Units 1 and 2 for the period from January 1, 2011 through December 31, 2013. The damage period was subsequently extended to December 31, 2014. On October 10, 2017, Alabama Power and Georgia Power filed additional lawsuits against the U.S. government in the Court of Federal Claims for the costs of continuing to store spent nuclear fuel at Plants Farley and Hatch and Plant Vogtle Units 1 and 2 for the period from January 1, 2015 through December 31, 2017. Damages will continue to accumulate until the issue is resolved or storage is provided. No amounts have been recognized in the financial statements as of December 31, 2017 for any potential recoveries from the pending lawsuits. The final outcome of these matters cannot be determined at this time. However, Alabama Power and Georgia Power expect to credit any recoveries back for the benefit of customers in accordance with direction from their respective PSC and, therefore, no material impact on Southern Company's net income is expected.
On-site dry spent fuel storage facilities are operational at all three plants and can be expanded to accommodate spent fuel through the expected life of each plant.
FERC Matters
Market-Based Rate Authority
The traditional electric operating companies and Southern Power have authority from the FERC to sell electricity at market-based rates. Since 2008, that authority, for certain balancing authority areas, has been conditioned on compliance with the requirements of an energy auction, which the FERC found to be tailored mitigation that addresses potential market power concerns. In accordance with FERC regulations governing such authority, the traditional electric operating companies and Southern Power filed a triennial market power analysis in 2014, which included continued reliance on the energy auction as tailored mitigation. In 2015, the FERC issued an order finding that the traditional electric operating companies' and Southern Power's existing tailored mitigation may not effectively mitigate the potential to exert market power in certain areas served by the traditional electric operating companies and in some adjacent areas. The FERC directed the traditional electric operating companies and Southern Power to show why market-based rate authority should not be revoked in these areas or to provide a mitigation plan to further address market power concerns. The traditional electric operating companies and Southern Power filed a request for rehearing and filed their response with the FERC in 2015.
In December 2016, the traditional electric operating companies and Southern Power filed an amendment to their market-based rate tariff that proposed certain changes to the energy auction, as well as several non-tariff changes. On February 2, 2017, the FERC issued an order accepting all such changes subject to an additional condition of cost-based price caps for certain sales outside of the energy auction, finding that all of these changes would provide adequate alternative mitigation for the traditional electric operating companies' and Southern Power's potential to exert market power in certain areas served by the traditional

NOTES (continued)
Southern Company and Subsidiary Companies 2017 Annual Report

electric operating companies and in some adjacent areas. On May 17, 2017, the FERC accepted the traditional electric operating companies' and Southern Power's compliance filing accepting the terms of the order. While the FERC's February 2, 2017 order references the market power proceeding discussed above, it remains a separate, ongoing matter.
On October 25, 2017, the FERC issued an order in response to the traditional electric operating companies' and Southern Power's June 29, 2017 triennial updated market power analysis. The FERC directed the traditional electric operating companies and Southern Power to show cause within 60 days why market-based rate authority should not be revoked in certain areas adjacent to the area presently under mitigation in accordance with the February 2, 2017 order or to provide a mitigation plan to further address market power concerns. On November 10, 2017, the traditional electric operating companies and Southern Power responded to the FERC and proposed to resolve matters by applying the alternative mitigation authorized by the February 2, 2017 order to the adjacent areas made the subject of the October 25, 2017 order.
The ultimate outcome of these matters cannot be determined at this time. See Notes 7 and 9 to the financial statements under "Southern Company GasEquity Method Investments" and "Guarantees," respectively, for additional information on these pipeline projects.
Regulatory Matters
Alabama Power
Alabama Power's revenues from regulated retail operations are collected through various rate mechanisms subject to the oversight of the Alabama PSC. Alabama Power currently recovers its costs from the regulated retail business primarily through Rate RSE, Rate CNP, Rate ECR, and Rate NDR. In addition, the Alabama PSC issues accounting orders to address current events impacting Alabama Power. See Note 2 to the financial statements under "Alabama Power" for additional information regarding Alabama Power's rate mechanisms and accounting orders.
Rate RSE
The Alabama PSC has adopted Rate RSE that provides for periodic annual adjustments based upon Alabama Power's projected weighted cost ofcommon equity (WCE)return (WCER) compared to an allowable range. Rate RSE adjustments are based on forward-looking information for the applicable upcoming calendar year. Retail rates remain unchangedRate RSE adjustments for any two-year period, when averaged together, cannot exceed 4.0% and any annual adjustment is limited to 5.0%. When the WCE ranges between 5.75%projected WCER is under the allowed range, there is

MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS (continued)
Southern Company and 6.21% with Subsidiary Companies 2018 Annual Report


an adjusting point of 5.98% and eligibility for a performance-based adder of seven basis points, or 0.07%, to the WCEWCER adjusting point if Alabama Power (i) has an "A" credit rating equivalent with at least one of the recognized rating agencies or (ii) is in the top one-third of a designated customer value benchmark survey. Rate RSE adjustments for any two-year period, when averaged together, cannot exceed 4.0% and any annual adjustment is limited to 5.0%. If Alabama Power's actual retail return is above the allowed WCEWCER range, the excess will be refunded to customers unless otherwise directed by the Alabama PSC; however, there is no provision for additional customer billings should the actual retail return fall below the WCEWCER range. Prior to January 2019, retail rates remained unchanged when the WCER range was between 5.75% and 6.21%.
On May 1, 2018, the Alabama PSC approved modifications to Rate RSE and other commitments designed to position Alabama Power to address the growing pressure on its credit quality resulting from the Tax Reform Legislation, without increasing retail rates under Rate RSE in the near term. Alabama Power plans to reduce growth in total debt by increasing equity, with corresponding reductions in debt issuances, thereby de-leveraging its capital structure. Alabama Power's goal is to achieve an equity ratio of approximately 55% by the end of 2025. At December 31, 2016,2018, Alabama Power's retail return exceededequity ratio was approximately 47%.
The approved modifications to Rate RSE began for billings in January 2019. The modifications include reducing the top of the allowed WCEWCER range which resulted infrom 6.21% to 6.15% and modifications to the refund mechanism applicable to prior year actual results. The modifications to the refund mechanism allow Alabama Power establishingto retain a $73 million Rate RSE refund liability. In accordance with an Alabama PSC order issued on February 14, 2017, Alabama Power applied the full amountportion of the refundrevenue that causes the actual WCER for a given year to reduceexceed the under recovered balance of Rate CNP PPA as discussed further below.allowed range.
Effective in January 2017, Rate RSE increased 4.48%, or $245 million annually. At December 31, 2017,Generally, if Alabama Power's actual retailWCER is between 6.15% and 7.65%, customers will receive 25% of the amount between 6.15% and 6.65%, 40% of the amount between 6.65% and 7.15%, and 75% of the amount between 7.15% and 7.65%. Customers will receive all amounts in excess of an actual WCER of 7.65%.
In conjunction with these modifications to Rate RSE, on May 8, 2018, Alabama Power consented to a moratorium on any upward adjustments under Rate RSE for 2019 and 2020 and will also return was within the allowed WCE range. $50 million to customers through bill credits in 2019.
On December 1, 2017,November 30, 2018, Alabama Power made its required annual Rate RSE submission to the Alabama PSC of projected data for calendar year 2018.2019. Projected earnings were within the specified range; therefore, retail rates under Rate RSE remainedremain unchanged for 2018.2019.
In conjunction withAt December 31, 2018, Alabama Power's retail return exceeded the allowed WCER range, which resulted in Alabama Power establishing a regulatory liability of $109 million for Rate RSE refunds. In accordance with an Alabama PSC order issued on February 5, 2019, Alabama Power has an established retail tariff that provides for an adjustmentwill apply $75 million to customer billingsreduce the Rate ECR under recovered balance and the remaining $34 million will be refunded to recognize the impact of a changecustomers through bill credits in the statutory income tax rate. As a result of Tax Reform Legislation, the application of this tariff would reduce annual retail revenue by approximately $250 million over the remainder of 2018. The ultimate outcome of this matter cannot be determined at this time.July through September 2019.
Rate CNP PPA
Alabama Power's retail rates, approved by the Alabama PSC, provide for adjustments under Rate CNP to recognize the placing of new generating facilities into retail service. Alabama Power may also recover retail costs associated with certificated PPAs under Rate CNP PPA. On March 7, 2017, the Alabama PSC issued a consent order that Alabama Power leave in effect the current Rate CNP PPA factor for billings for the period April 1, 2017 through March 31, 2018. No adjustmentadjustments to Rate CNP PPA occurred during the period 2016 through 2018 and no adjustment is expected in 2018. As of December 31, 2017 and 2016, Alabama Power had an under recovered Rate CNP PPA balance of $12 million and $142 million, respectively, which is included in deferred under recovered regulatory clause revenues in the balance sheet.2019.
In accordance with an accounting order issued onin February 17, 2017 by the Alabama PSC, Alabama Power eliminatedreclassified $69 million of the under recovered balance in Rate CNP PPA at December 31, 2016 which totaled approximately $142 million. As discussed herein under "Rate RSE," Alabama Power utilized the full amount of its $73 million Rate RSE refund liability to reduce the amount of the Rate CNP PPA under recovery and reclassified the remaining $69 millionrecovered balance to a separate regulatory asset. The amortization of the new regulatory asset through Rate RSE will begin concurrently with the effective date of Alabama Power's next depreciation study, which is expected to occur within the next two to four years. Alabama Power's current depreciation study became effective January 1, 2017.no later than 2022.

NOTES (continued)
Southern Company and Subsidiary Companies 2017 Annual Report

Rate CNP Compliance
Rate CNP Compliance allows for the recovery of Alabama Power's retail costs associated with laws, regulations, and other such mandates directed at the utility industry involving the environment, security, reliability, safety, sustainability, or similar considerations impacting Alabama Power's facilities or operations. Rate CNP Compliance is based on forward-looking information and provides for the recovery of these costs pursuant to a factor that is calculated annually. Compliance costs to be recovered include operations and maintenance expenses, depreciation, and a return on certain invested capital. Revenues for Rate CNP Compliance, as recorded on the financial statements, are adjusted for differences in actual recoverable costs and amounts billed in current regulated rates. Accordingly, changes in the billing factor will have no significant effect on revenues or net income, but will affect annual cash flow. Changes in Rate CNP Compliance-related operations and maintenance expenses and depreciation generally will have no effect on net income.
In accordance with an accounting order issued onin February 17, 2017 by the Alabama PSC, Alabama Power reclassified $36 million of its under recovered balance in Rate CNP Compliance to a separate regulatory asset. The amortization of the new regulatory asset

MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS (continued)
Southern Company and Subsidiary Companies 2018 Annual Report


through Rate RSE will begin concurrently with the effective date of Alabama Power's next depreciation study, which is expected to occur within the next two to four years. Alabama Power's current depreciation study became effective January 1, 2017.no later than 2022.
On November 30, 2018, Alabama Power submitted calculations associated with its cost of complying with environmental mandates, as provided under Rate CNP Compliance. The filing reflected a projected unrecovered retail revenue requirement for environmental compliance of approximately $205 million, which is being recovered in the billing months of January 2019 through December 5, 2017,2019.
Tax Reform Accounting Order
On May 1, 2018, the Alabama PSC issued a consentapproved an accounting order that authorized Alabama Power leave in effect for 2018to defer the factorsbenefits of federal excess deferred income taxes associated with Alabama Power's compliance coststhe Tax Reform Legislation for the year 2017, with any under-collected amount for prior years deemed recovered before any current year amounts. Anyended December 31, 2018 as a regulatory liability and to use up to $30 million of such deferrals to offset under recovered amounts associated with 2018 will be reflected inunder Rate ECR. The estimated deferrals for the 2019 filing. As ofyear ended December 31, 2017 and 2016, Alabama Power had a deferred under recovered regulatory clause revenues balance2018 totaled approximately $63 million, subject to adjustment following the filing of $17the 2018 tax return, of which $30 million and $9 million, respectively.
Rate ECR
Alabama Power has established energy cost recovery rates under Alabama Power's Rate ECR as approved by the Alabama PSC. Rates are based on an estimate of future energy costs and the current over or under recovered balance. Revenues recognized under Rate ECR and recorded on the financial statements are adjusted for the difference in actual recoverable fuel costs and amounts billed in current regulated rates. The difference in the recoverable fuel costs and amounts billed give risewas used to the over or under recovered amounts recorded as regulatory assets or liabilities. Alabama Power, along with the Alabama PSC, continually monitors the over or under recovered cost balance to determine whether an adjustment to billing rates is required. Changes inoffset the Rate ECR factor have no significant effectunder recovered balance and $33 million is recorded in other regulatory liabilities, deferred on Southern Company's net income, but will impact operating cash flows. Currently, the Alabama PSC may approve billing rates under Rate ECRbalance sheet to be used for the benefit of up to 5.910 cents per KWH.
In accordance with an accounting order issued on February 17, 2017customers as determined by the Alabama PSC Alabama Power reclassified $36 million of itsat a future date. See Note 10 to the financial statements under recovered balance in Rate ECR to a separate regulatory asset. The amortization of the new regulatory asset through Rate RSE will begin concurrently with the effective date of Alabama Power's next depreciation study, which is expected to occur within the next two to four years. Alabama Power's current depreciation study became effective January 1, 2017."Current and Deferred Income Taxes" for additional information.
On December 5, 2017, the Alabama PSC issued a consent order that Alabama Power leave in effect for 2018 the energy cost recovery rates which began in 2017. Therefore, the Rate ECR factor as of January 1, 2018 remained at 2.015 cents per KWH. The rate will return to 5.910 cents per KWH in 2019, absent a further order from the Alabama PSC.Environmental Accounting Order
At December 31, 2017, Alabama Power's under recovered fuel costs totaled $25 million, which is included in other regulatory assets, current. At December 31, 2016, Alabama Power had an over recovered fuel balance of $76 million, which was included in other regulatory liabilities, current. These classifications are based on estimates, which include such factors as weather, generation availability, energy demand, and the price of energy. A change in any of these factors could have a material impact on the timing of any recovery or return of fuel costs.
Rate NDR
Based on an order from the Alabama PSC Alabama Power maintains a reserve for operations and maintenance expenses to cover the cost of damages from major storms to its transmission and distribution facilities. The order approves a separate monthly Rate NDR charge to customers consisting of two components. The first component is intended to establish and maintain a reserve balance for future storms and is an on-going part of customer billing. When the reserve balance falls below $50 million, a reserve establishment charge will be activated (and the on-going reserve maintenance charge concurrently suspended) until the reserve balance reaches $75 million. The second component of the Rate NDR charge is intended to allow recovery of any existing deferred storm-related operations and maintenance costs and any future reserve deficits over a 24-month period. The Alabama PSC order gives Alabama Power authority to record a deficit balance in the NDR when costs of storm damage exceed any established reserve balance. Absent further Alabama PSC approval, the maximum total Rate NDR charge consisting of both

NOTES (continued)
Southern Company and Subsidiary Companies 2017 Annual Report

components is $10 per month per non-residential customer account and $5 per month per residential customer account. Alabama Power has the authority, based on an order from the Alabama PSC, to accrue certain additional amounts as circumstances warrant. The order allows for reliability-related expenditures to be charged against the additional accruals when the NDR balance exceeds $75 million. Alabama Power may designate a portion of the NDR to reliability-related expenditures as a part of an annual budget process for the following year or during the current year for identified unbudgeted reliability-related expenditures that are incurred. Accruals that have not been designated can be used to offset storm charges. Additional accruals to the NDR will enhance Alabama Power's ability to deal with the financial effects of future natural disasters, promote system reliability, and offset costs retail customers would otherwise bear. No such accruals were recorded or designated in any period presented.
In December 2017, the reserve maintenance charge was suspended and the reserve establishment charge was activated as a result of the NDR balance falling below $50 million. Alabama Power expects to collect approximately $16 million annually until the reserve balance is restored to $75 million. The NDR balance at December 31, 2017 was $38 million.
As revenue from the Rate NDR charge is recognized, an equal amount of operations and maintenance expenses related to the NDR will also be recognized. As a result, the Rate NDR charge will not have an effect on net income but will impact operating cash flows.
Environmental(Environmental Accounting Order
Based on an order from the Alabama PSC,Order), Alabama Power is allowed to establish a regulatory asset to record the unrecovered investment costs, including the unrecovered plant asset balance and the unrecovered costs associated with site removal and closure associated with future unit retirements caused by environmental regulations. The regulatory asset will beis being amortized and recovered over the affected unit's remaining useful life, as established prior to the decision regarding early retirement through Rate CNP Compliance. At December 31, 2018, this regulatory asset had a balance of $42 million. See "Environmental MattersEnvironmental Laws and Regulations" herein for additional information regarding environmental regulations.
Subsequent to December 31, 2018, Alabama Power retireddetermined that Plant Gorgas Units 68, 9, and 7 (20010 (approximately 1,000 MWs) will be retired by April 15, 2019 due to the expected costs of compliance with federal and Plant Barry Unit 3 (225 MWs) in 2015. Additionally, Alabama Power ceased using coal at Plant Barry Units 1 and 2 (250 MWs) in 2015, but such units remain available on a limited basis with natural gas as the fuel source. In April 2016, Alabama Power also ceased using coal at Plant Greene County Units 1 and 2 (300 MWs representing Alabama Power's ownership interest) and began operating Units 1 and 2 solely on natural gas in June 2016 and July 2016, respectively.
state environmental regulations. In accordance with this accounting order from the Alabama PSC, Alabama PowerEnvironmental Accounting Order, approximately $740 million of net investment costs will be transferred to a regulatory asset at the unrecovered plant asset balances to regulatory assets at their respective retirement dates. These regulatory assets are being amortizeddate and recovered through Rate CNP Compliance over the affected units' remaining useful lives, as established prior to the decision for retirement; therefore, these decisions associated with coal operations had no significant impact on Southern Company's financial statements.
to retire.
Georgia Power
Georgia Power's revenues from regulated retail operations are collected through various rate mechanisms subject to the oversight of the Georgia PSC. Georgia Power currently recovers its costs from the regulated retail business through the 2013 ARP, which includes traditional base tariff rates, Demand-Side Management (DSM) tariffs, Environmental Compliance Cost Recovery (ECCR) tariffs, and Municipal Franchise Fee (MFF) tariffs. Georgia Power is scheduled to file a base rate case by July 1, 2019, which may continue or modify these tariffs. In addition, financing costs on certified construction costs of Plant Vogtle Units 3 and 4 are being collected through the NCCR tariff and fuel costs are collected through a separate fuel cost recovery tariff. See Note 2 to the financial statements under "Georgia Power" for additional information.
Rate Plans
Pursuant to the terms and conditions of a settlement agreement related to Southern Company's acquisition of Southern Company Gas approved by the Georgia PSC in April 2016, the 2013 ARP will continue in effect until December 31, 2019, and Georgia Power will be required to file its next base rate case by July 1, 2019. Furthermore, through December 31, 2019, Georgia Power and Atlanta Gas Light Company each will retain their respectiveits merger savings, net of transition costs, as defined in the settlement agreement; through December 31, 2022, such net merger savings applicable to each will be shared on a 60/40 basis with their respective customers; thereafter, all merger savings will be retained by customers. See Note 15 to the financial statements under "Southern Company Merger with Southern Company Gas" for additional information regarding the Merger.
In accordance with the 2013 ARP, the Georgia PSC approved increases to tariffs effective January 1, 2016 as follows: (1) traditional base tariff rates by approximately $49 million; (2) Environmental Compliance Cost Recovery tariff by approximately $75 million; (3) Demand-Side Management tariffs by approximately $3 million; and (4) Municipal Franchise Fee tariff by approximately $13 million, for a total increase in base revenues of approximately $140 million. There were no changes to theseGeorgia Power's traditional base tariff rates, ECCR tariff, DSM tariffs, or MFF tariff in 2017.2017 or 2018.
Under the 2013 ARP, Georgia Power's retail ROE is set at 10.95% and earnings are evaluated against a retail ROE range of 10.00% to 12.00%. Two-thirds of any earnings above 12.00% will be directly refunded to customers, with the remaining one-third retained by Georgia Power. There will be no recovery of any earnings shortfall below 10.00% on an actual basis. In 2015, Georgia Power's retail ROE was within the allowed retail ROE range. In 2016, Georgia Power's retail ROE exceeded 12.00%, and Georgia Power will refundrefunded to retail customers approximately $44 million in 2018 approximately $40 million as approved by the Georgia PSC on January 16, 2018. In 2017, Georgia Power's retail ROE was within the allowed retail ROE range, subject to review and approval byPSC. On February 5, 2019, the Georgia PSC.PSC approved a settlement between Georgia Power and the staff
    Table of Contents                                Index to Financial Statements

NOTESMANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS (continued)
Southern Company and Subsidiary Companies 20172018 Annual Report


of the Georgia PSC under which Georgia Power's retail ROE for 2017 was stipulated to exceed 12.00% and Georgia Power will reduce certain regulatory assets by approximately $4 million in lieu of providing refunds to retail customers. In 2018, Georgia Power's retail ROE exceeded 12.00%, and Georgia Power accrued approximately $100 million to refund to retail customers, subject to review and approval by the Georgia PSC.
On January 19,April 3, 2018, the Georgia PSC issued an order onapproved the Georgia Power Tax Reform Legislation, which was amended on February 16, 2018 (Tax Order). In accordance withSettlement Agreement. Pursuant to the Tax Order, Georgia Power is requiredTax Reform Settlement Agreement, to submit its analysisreflect the federal income tax rate reduction impact of the Tax Reform Legislation, Georgia Power will refund to customers a total of $330 million through bill credits. Georgia Power issued bill credits of approximately $130 million in 2018 and related recommendationswill issue bill credits of approximately $95 million in June 2019 and $105 million in February 2020. In addition, Georgia Power is deferring as a regulatory liability (i) the revenue equivalent of the tax expense reduction resulting from legislation lowering the Georgia state income tax rate from 6.00% to address5.75% in 2019 and (ii) the entire benefit of federal and state excess accumulated deferred income taxes, which is expected to total approximately $700 million at December 31, 2019. At December 31, 2018, the related impacts onregulatory liability balance totaled $610 million. The amortization of these regulatory liabilities is expected to be addressed in the Georgia Power 2019 Base Rate Case. If there is not a base rate case in 2019, customers will receive $185 million in annual bill credits beginning in 2020, with any additional federal and state income tax savings deferred as a regulatory liability, until Georgia Power's costnext base rate case.
To address some of servicethe negative cash flow and annual revenue requirementscredit quality impacts of the Tax Reform Legislation, the Georgia PSC also approved an increase in Georgia Power's retail equity ratio to the lower of (i) Georgia Power's actual common equity weight in its capital structure or (ii) 55%, until the Georgia Power 2019 Base Rate Case. At December 31, 2018, Georgia Power's actual retail common equity ratio (on a 13-month average basis) was approximately 55%. Benefits from reduced federal income tax rates in excess of the amounts refunded to customers will be retained by March 6, 2018. The ultimate outcomeGeorgia Power to cover the carrying costs of this matter cannot be determined at this time.the incremental equity in 2018 and 2019.
Integrated Resource PlanRegulatory Matters
In July 2016, the Georgia PSC approved Georgia Power's triennial Integrated Resource Plan (2016 IRP) including the decertification and retirement of Plant Mitchell Units 3, 4A, and 4B (217 MWs) and Plant Kraft Unit 1 (17 MWs), as well as the decertification of the Intercession City unit (143 MWs total capacity). In August 2016, the Plant Mitchell and Plant Kraft units were retired and Georgia Power sold its 33% ownership interest in the Intercession City unit to Duke Energy Florida, LLC.
Additionally, the Georgia PSC approved Georgia Power's environmental compliance strategy and related expenditures proposed in the 2016 IRP, including measures taken to comply with existing government-imposed environmental mandates, subject to limits on expenditures for Plant McIntosh Unit 1 and Plant Hammond Units 1 through 4.
The Georgia PSC approved the reclassification of the remaining net book value of Plant Mitchell Unit 3 and costs associated with materials and supplies remaining at the unit retirement date to a regulatory asset. Recovery of the unit's net book value will continue through December 31, 2019, as provided in the 2013 ARP. The timing of the recovery of the remaining balance of the unit's net book value as of December 31, 2019 and costs associated with materials and supplies remaining at the unit retirement date was deferred for consideration in Georgia Power's 2019 base rate case.
The Georgia PSC also approved the Renewable Energy Development Initiative (REDI) to procure an additional 1,200 MWs of renewable resources primarily utilizing market-based prices established through a competitive bidding process with expected in-service dates between 2018 and 2021. Additionally, 200 MWs of self-build capacity for use by Georgia Power was approved, as well as consideration for no more than 200 MWs of capacity as part of a renewable commercial and industrial program.
In 2017, Georgia Power filed for and received certification for 510 MWs of REDI utility-scale PPAs for solar generation resources, which are expected to be in operation by the end of 2019. Georgia Power also filed for and received approval to develop several solar generation projects to fulfill the approved self-build capacity.
In the 2016 IRP, the Georgia PSC also approved recovery of costs up to $99 million through June 30, 2019 to preserve nuclear generation as an option at a future generation site in Stewart County, Georgia. On March 7, 2017, the Georgia PSC approvedvoted to approve (and issued its related order on January 11, 2018) Georgia Power's decisionrecommendation to suspend work atcontinue construction and resolved the site duefollowing regulatory matters related to changing economics, including lower load forecastsPlant Vogtle Units 3 and fuel costs. The timing4: (i) none of recovery forthe $3.3 billion of costs incurred through December 31, 2015 and reflected in the fourteenth VCM report should be disallowed from rate base on the basis of approximately $50 million is expectedimprudence; (ii) the Contractor Settlement Agreement was reasonable and prudent and none of the amounts paid pursuant to the Contractor Settlement Agreement should be disallowed from rate base on the basis of imprudence; (iii) (a) capital costs incurred up to $5.68 billion would be presumed to be determinedreasonable and prudent with the burden of proof on any party challenging such costs, (b) Georgia Power would have the burden to show that any capital costs above $5.68 billion were prudent, and (c) a revised capital cost forecast of $7.3 billion (after reflecting the impact of payments received under the Guarantee Settlement Agreement and related Customer Refunds) was found reasonable; (iv) construction of Plant Vogtle Units 3 and 4 should be completed, with Southern Nuclear serving as project manager and Bechtel as primary contractor; (v) approved and deemed reasonable Georgia Power's revised schedule placing Plant Vogtle Units 3 and 4 in service in November 2021 and November 2022, respectively; (vi) confirmed that the revised cost forecast does not represent a cost cap and that prudence decisions on cost recovery will be made at a later date, consistent with applicable Georgia law; (vii) reduced the ROE used to calculate the NCCR tariff (a) from 10.95% (the ROE rate setting point authorized by the Georgia PSC in a future Georgia Power rate case.
Fuel Cost Recovery
Georgia Power has established fuel cost recovery rates approved by the Georgia PSC. In 2015, the Georgia PSC approved Georgia Power's request2013 ARP) to lower annual billings by approximately $350 million10.00% effective January 1, 2016. In May 2016, (b) from 10.00% to 8.30%, effective January 1, 2020, and (c) from 8.30% to 5.30%, effective January 1, 2021 (provided that the Georgia PSC approvedROE in no case will be less than Georgia Power's request to further lower annual billings under an interim fuel rider by approximately $313 million effective June 1, 2016, which expired on December 31, 2017. The Georgia PSC will review Georgia Power's cumulative over or under recovered fuel balance no later than September 1, 2018average cost of long-term debt); (viii) reduced the ROE used for AFUDC equity for Plant Vogtle Units 3 and evaluate the need to file a fuel case unless Georgia Power deems it necessary to file a fuel case at an earlier time. Georgia Power continues to be allowed to adjust its fuel cost recovery rates under an interim fuel rider prior to the next fuel case if the under recovered fuel balance exceeds $200 million.
Georgia Power's fuel cost recovery mechanism includes costs associated with a natural gas hedging program, as revised and approved by the Georgia PSC, allowing the use of an array of derivative instruments within a 48-month time horizon.
Georgia Power's under recovered fuel balance totaled $165 million at December 31, 2017 and is included in current assets. At December 31, 2016, Georgia Power's over recovered fuel balance totaled $84 million and is included in other regulatory liabilities, current.
Fuel cost recovery revenues as recorded on the financial statements are adjusted for differences in actual recoverable fuel costs and amounts billed in current regulated rates. Accordingly, changes in the billing factor will not have a significant effect on Southern Company's revenues or net income, but will affect cash flow.
Storm Damage Recovery
Georgia Power is accruing $30 million annually through December 31, 2019, as provided in the 2013 ARP, for incremental operating and maintenance costs of damage4 from major storms to its transmission and distribution facilities. Hurricanes Irma and Matthew caused significant damage10.00% to Georgia Power's transmissionaverage cost of long-term debt, effective January 1, 2018; and distribution facilities during September(ix) agreed that upon Unit 3 reaching commercial operation, retail base rates would be adjusted to include carrying costs on those capital costs deemed prudent in the Vogtle Cost Settlement Agreement. The January 11, 2018 order also stated that if Plant Vogtle Units 3 and 4 are not commercially operational by June 1, 2021 and June 1, 2022, respectively, the ROE used to calculate the NCCR tariff will be further reduced by 10 basis points each month (but not lower than Georgia Power's average cost of long-term debt) until the respective Unit is commercially operational. The ROE reductions negatively impacted earnings by approximately $100 million, $25 million, and $20 million in 2018, 2017, and 2016, respectively, and are estimated to have negative earnings impacts of approximately $75 million in 2019 and an aggregate of approximately $615 million from 2020 to 2022.

I-30

    Table of Contents                                Index to Financial Statements

NOTES (continued)
Southern Company and Subsidiary Companies 2017 Annual Report

October 2016, respectively. The incremental restoration costs related to these hurricanes deferred inIn its January 11, 2018 order, the Georgia PSC also stated if other conditions change and assumptions upon which Georgia Power's regulatory assetseventeenth VCM report are based do not materialize, the Georgia PSC reserved the right to reconsider the decision to continue construction.
On February 12, 2018, Georgia Interfaith Power & Light, Inc. (GIPL) and Partnership for storm damage totaled approximately $260 million. The rateSouthern Equity, Inc. (PSE) filed a petition appealing the Georgia PSC's January 11, 2018 order with the Fulton County Superior Court. On March 8, 2018, Georgia Watch filed a similar appeal to the Fulton County Superior Court for judicial review of storm damage cost recovery is expected to be adjusted as partthe Georgia PSC's decision and denial of Georgia Watch's motion for reconsideration. On December 21, 2018, the Fulton County Superior Court granted Georgia Power's next base rate case requiredmotion to bedismiss the two appeals. On January 9, 2019, GIPL, PSE, and Georgia Watch filed by July 1, 2019. As a resultan appeal of this regulatory treatment, costs related to storms are not expected todecision with the Georgia Court of Appeals. Georgia Power believes the appeal has no merit; however, an adverse outcome in the appeal combined with subsequent adverse action by the Georgia PSC could have a material impact on Southern Company's financial statements.
At December 31, 2017 and December 31, 2016, the total balance in Georgia Power's regulatory asset related to storm damage was $333 millionresults of operations, financial condition, and $206 million, respectively, with approximately $30 million included in other regulatory assets, current for both years and approximately $303 million and $176 million included in other regulatory assets, deferred, respectively.
Gulf Power
Retail Base Rate Casesliquidity.
In 2013, the Florida PSC approvedpreparation for its nineteenth VCM filing, Georgia Power requested Southern Nuclear to perform a settlement agreement related to Gulf Power's 2013 retail base rate case that authorized Gulf Power to reduce depreciation and record a regulatory asset up to $62.5 million from January 2014 through June 2017. In any given month, such depreciation reduction was not to exceed the amount necessaryfull cost reforecast for the retail ROE, as reportedproject. This reforecast, performed prior to the Florida PSC monthly, to reach the midpoint of the authorized retail ROE range then in effect. For 2014 and 2015, Gulf Power recognized reductions in depreciation of $8.4 million and $20.1 million, respectively. No net reduction in depreciation was recorded in 2016. In 2017, Gulf Power recognized the remaining $34.0 million reduction in depreciation.
On April 4, 2017, the Florida PSC approved a settlement agreement (2017 Rate Case Settlement Agreement) among Gulf Power and three intervenors with respect to Gulf Power's request in 2016 to increase retail base rates. Among the terms of the 2017 Rate Case Settlement Agreement, Gulf Power increased rates effective with the first billing cycle in July 2017 to provide an annual overall net customer impact of approximately $54.3 million. The net customer impact consisted of a $62.0 million increase in annual base revenues, less an annual purchased power capacity cost recovery clause credit for certain wholesale revenues of approximately $8 million through December 2019. In addition, Gulf Power continued its authorized retail ROE midpoint (10.25%) and range (9.25% to 11.25%) and is deemed to have a maximum equity ratio of 52.5% for all retail regulatory purposes. Gulf Power also began amortizing the regulatory asset associated with the investment balances remaining after the retirement of Plant Smith Units 1 and 2 (357 MWs) over 15 years effective January 1, 2018 and implemented new depreciation rates effective January 1, 2018. The 2017 Rate Case Settlement Agreement alsonineteenth VCM filing, resulted in a $32.5 million write-down of Gulf Power's ownership of Plant Scherer Unit 3 (205 MWs), which was recorded$0.7 billion increase to the base capital cost forecast reported in the firstsecond quarter 2017. The remaining issues2018. This base cost increase primarily resulted from changed assumptions related to the inclusionfinalization of Gulf Power's investmentcontract scopes and management responsibilities for Bechtel and over 60 subcontractors, labor productivity rates, and craft labor incentives, as well as the related levels of project management, oversight, and support, including field supervision and engineering support.
Although Georgia Power believes these incremental costs are reasonable and necessary to complete the project and the Georgia PSC's order in the seventeenth VCM proceeding specifically states that the construction of Plant Scherer UnitVogtle Units 3 and 4 is not subject to a cost cap, Georgia Power did not seek rate recovery for these cost increases included in retail rates have been resolvedthe current base capital cost forecast (or any related financing costs) in the nineteenth VCM report. In connection with future VCM filings, Georgia Power may request the Georgia PSC to evaluate costs currently included in the construction contingency estimate for rate recovery as a resultand when they are appropriately included in the base capital cost forecast. After considering the significant level of uncertainty that exists regarding the 2017 Rate Case Settlement Agreement, includingfuture recoverability of certain costs associated withincluded in the ongoing ownership and operationconstruction contingency estimate since the ultimate outcome of the unit through the environmental cost recovery clause.
The 2017 Rate Case Settlement Agreement set forth a process for addressing the revenue requirement effects of the Tax Reform Legislation through a prospective change to Gulf Power's base rates. Under the terms of the 2017 Rate Case Settlement Agreement, by March 1, 2018, Gulf Power must identify the revenue requirements impacts and defer them to a regulatory asset or regulatory liability to be considered for prospective application in a change to base rates in a limited scope proceeding before the Florida PSC. In lieu of this approach, on February 14, 2018, the partiesthese matters is subject to the 2017 Rate Case Settlement Agreement filedoutcome of future assessments by management, as well as Georgia PSC decisions in these future regulatory proceedings, Georgia Power recorded a new stipulationtotal pre-tax charge to income of $1.1 billion ($0.8 billion after tax) in the second quarter 2018, which includes the total increase in the base capital cost forecast and settlement agreement (2018 Tax Reform Settlement Agreement) with the Florida PSC. If approved, the 2018 Tax Reform Settlement Agreement will result in annual reductions of $18.2 million to Gulf Power's base rates and $15.6 million to Gulf Power's environmental cost recovery rates effective beginning the first calendar month following approval.
The 2018 Tax Reform Settlement Agreement also provides for a one-time refund of $69.4 million for the retail portion of unprotected (not subject to normalization) deferred tax liabilities through Gulf Power's fuel cost recovery rate over the remainder of 2018. In addition, a limited scope proceeding to address the flow back of protected deferred tax liabilities will be initiated by May 1, 2018 and Gulf Power will record a regulatory liability for the related 2018 amounts eligible to be returned to customers consistent with IRS normalization principles. Unless otherwise agreed to by the parties to the 2018 Tax Reform Settlement Agreement, amounts recorded in this regulatory liability will be refunded to retail customers in 2019 through Gulf Power's fuel cost recovery rate.
If the 2018 Tax Reform Settlement Agreement is approved, the 2017 Rate Case Settlement Agreement will be amended to increase Gulf Power's maximum equity ratio from 52.5% to 53.5% for regulatory purposes.construction contingency estimate.
The ultimate outcome of these matters cannot be determined at this time.
See Note 2 to the financial statements under "Georgia Power – Nuclear Construction" in Item 8 herein for additional information regarding Plant Vogtle Units 3 and 4.
Mississippi PowerSouthern Company Gas' significant investments in pipelines and pipeline development projects involve financial and execution risks.
On February 7, 2018, Mississippi Power revised its annual projected Performance Evaluation Plan (PEP) filing for 2018 to reflect the impactsSouthern Company Gas has made significant investments in existing pipelines and pipeline development projects. Many of the Tax Reform Legislation. existing pipelines are, and when completed many of the pipeline development projects will be, operated by third parties. If one of these agents fails to perform in a proper manner, the value of the investment could decline and Southern Company Gas could lose part or all of its investment. In addition, from time to time, Southern Company Gas may be required to contribute additional capital to a pipeline joint venture or guarantee the obligations of such joint venture.
With respect to certain pipeline development projects, Southern Company Gas will rely on its joint venture partners for construction management and will not exercise direct control over the process. All of the pipeline development projects are dependent on contractors for the successful and timely completion of the projects. Further, the development of pipeline projects involves numerous regulatory, environmental, construction, safety, political, and legal uncertainties and may require the expenditure of significant amounts of capital. These projects may not be completed on schedule, at the budgeted cost, or at all. There may be cost overruns and construction difficulties that cause Southern Company Gas' capital expenditures to exceed its initial expectations. Moreover, Southern Company Gas' income will not increase immediately upon the expenditure of funds on a pipeline project. Pipeline construction occurs over an extended period of time and Southern Company Gas will not receive material increases in income until the project is placed in service.
Work continues with state and federal agencies to obtain the required permits to begin construction on the PennEast Pipeline. Any material delays may impact forecasted capital expenditures and the expected in-service date.
The revised filing requestsAtlantic Coast Pipeline has experienced challenges to its permits since construction began in 2018. During the third and fourth quarters 2018, a FERC stop work order, together with delays in obtaining permits necessary for construction and construction delays due to judicial actions, impacted the cost and schedule for the project. As a result, total project cost estimates have increased and the operator of the joint venture currently expects to achieve a late 2020 in-service date for at least

I-31


key segments of the Atlantic Coast Pipeline, while the remainder may extend into early 2021. Abnormal weather, work delays (including due to judicial or regulatory action), and other conditions may result in additional cost or schedule modifications, which could result in an impairment of Southern Company Gas' investment and could have a material impact on Southern Company's and Southern Company Gas' financial statements.
The ultimate outcome of these matters cannot be determined at this time and the occurrence of these or any other of the foregoing events could adversely affect the results of operations, cash flows, and financial condition of Southern Company Gas and Southern Company.
FINANCIAL, ECONOMIC, AND MARKET RISKS
The electric generation and energy marketing operations of the traditional electric operating companies and Southern Power and the natural gas operations of Southern Company Gas are subject to risks, many of which are beyondtheir control, including changes in energy prices and fuel costs, which may reduce revenues and increase costs.
The generation, energy marketing, and natural gas operations of the Southern Company system are subject to changes in energy prices and fuel costs, which could increase the cost of producing power, decrease the amount received from the sale of energy, and/or make electric generating facilities less competitive. The market prices for these commodities may fluctuate significantly over relatively short periods of time. Among the factors that could influence energy prices and fuel costs are:
prevailing market prices for coal, natural gas, uranium, fuel oil, biomass, and other fuels, as applicable, used in the generation facilities of the traditional electric operating companies and Southern Power and, in the case of natural gas, distributed by Southern Company Gas, including associated transportation costs, and supplies of such commodities;
demand for energy and the extent of additional supplies of energy available from current or new competitors;
liquidity in the general wholesale electricity and natural gas markets;
weather conditions impacting demand for electricity and natural gas;
seasonality;
transmission or transportation constraints, disruptions, or inefficiencies;
availability of competitively priced alternative energy sources;
forced or unscheduled plant outages for the Southern Company system, its competitors, or third party providers;
the financial condition of market participants;
the economy in the Southern Company system's service territory, the nation, and worldwide, including the impact of economic conditions on demand for electricity and the demand for fuels, including natural gas;
natural disasters, wars, embargos, physical or cyber attacks, and other catastrophic events; and
federal, state, and foreign energy and environmental regulation and legislation.
These factors could increase the expenses and/or reduce the revenues of the registrants. For the traditional electric operating companies and Southern Company Gas' regulated gas distribution operations, such impacts may not be fully recoverable through rates.
Historically, the traditional electric operating companies and Southern Company Gas from time to time have experienced underrecovered fuel and/or purchased gas cost balances and may experience such balances in the future. While the traditional electric operating companies and Southern Company Gas are generally authorized to recover fuel and/or purchased gas costs through cost recovery clauses, recovery may be denied if costs are deemed to be imprudently incurred, and delays in the authorization of such recovery, both of which could negatively impact the cash flows of the affected traditional electric operating company or Southern Company Gas and of Southern Company.
The registrants are subject to risks associated with a changing economic environment, customer behaviors, including increased energy conservation, and adoption patterns of technologies by the customers of the Subsidiary Registrants.
The consumption and use of energy are fundamentally linked to economic activity. This relationship is affected over time by changes in the economy, customer behaviors, and technologies. Any economic downturn could negatively impact customer growth and usage per customer, thus reducing the sales of energy and revenues. Additionally, any economic downturn or disruption of financial markets, both nationally and internationally, could negatively affect the financial stability of customers and counterparties of the Subsidiary Registrants.
Outside of economic disruptions, changes in customer behaviors in response to energy efficiency programs, changing conditions and preferences, or changes in the adoption of technologies could affect the relationship of economic activity to the consumption of energy.
Both federal and state programs exist to influence how customers use energy, and several of the traditional electric operating companies and Southern Company Gas have PSC or other applicable state regulatory agency mandates to promote energy efficiency. Conservation programs could impact the financial results of the registrants in different ways. For example, if any traditional electric operating company or Southern Company Gas is required to invest in conservation measures that result in

I-32


reduced sales from effective conservation, regulatory lag in adjusting rates for the impact of these measures could have a negative financial impact on such traditional electric operating company or Southern Company Gas and Southern Company. Customers could also voluntarily reduce their consumption of energy in response to decreases in their disposable income, increases in energy prices, or individual conservation efforts.
In addition, the adoption of technology by customers can have both positive and negative impacts on sales. Many new technologies utilize less energy than in the past. However, electric and natural gas technologies such as electric and natural gas vehicles can create additional demand. The Southern Company system uses best available methods and experience to incorporate the effects of changes in customer behavior, state and federal programs, PSC or other applicable state regulatory agency mandates, and technology, but the Southern Company system's planning processes may not appropriately estimate and incorporate these effects.
All of the factors discussed above could adversely affect a registrant's results of operations, financial condition, and liquidity.
The operating results of the registrants are affected by weather conditions and may fluctuate on a seasonal andquarterly basis. In addition, catastrophic events, such as fires, earthquakes, hurricanes, tornadoes, floods, droughts, and storms, could result in substantial damage to or limit the operation of the properties of a Subsidiary Registrant and could negatively impact results of operation, financial condition, and liquidity.
Electric power and natural gas supply are generally seasonal businesses. In many parts of the country, demand for power peaks during the summer months, with market prices also peaking at that time. In other areas, power demand peaks during the winter months. While the electric power sales of some of the traditional electric operating companies peak in the summer, others peak in the winter. In the aggregate, electric power sales peak during the summer with a smaller peak during the winter. Additionally, Southern Power has variability in its revenues from renewable generation facilities due to seasonal weather patterns primarily from wind and sun. In most of the areas Southern Company Gas serves, natural gas demand peaks during the winter. As a result, the overall operating results of the registrants may fluctuate substantially on a seasonal basis. In addition, the Subsidiary Registrants have historically sold less power and natural gas when weather conditions are milder. Unusually mild weather in the future could reduce the revenues, net income, and available cash of the affected registrant.
Further, volatile or significant weather events could result in substantial damage to the transmission and distribution lines of the traditional electric operating companies, the generating facilities of the traditional electric operating companies and Southern Power, and the natural gas distribution and storage facilities of Southern Company Gas. The Subsidiary Registrants have significant investments in the Atlantic and Gulf Coast regions and Southern Power and Southern Company Gas have investments in various states which could be subject to severe weather and natural disasters, including wildfires. Further, severe drought conditions can reduce the availability of water and restrict or prevent the operation of certain generating facilities. There have been multiple significant hurricanes in the Southern Company system service territory in recent years.
In the event a traditional electric operating company or Southern Company Gas experiences any of these weather events or any natural disaster or other catastrophic event, recovery of costs in excess of reserves and insurance coverage is subject to the approval of its state PSC or other applicable state regulatory agency. Historically, the traditional electric operating companies from time to time have experienced deficits in their storm cost recovery reserve balances and may experience such deficits in the future. For example, at December 31, 2018, Georgia Power had a substantial underrecovered balance in its storm cost recovery balance as a result of multiple recent significant hurricanes in its service territory. Any denial by the applicable state PSC or other applicable state regulatory agency or delay in recovery of any portion of such costs could have a material negative impact on a traditional electric operating company's or Southern Company Gas' and on Southern Company's results of operations, financial condition, and liquidity.
In addition, damages resulting from significant weather events within the service territory of any traditional electric operating company or Southern Company Gas or affecting Southern Power's customers may result in the loss of customers and reduced demand for energy for extended periods and may impact customers' ability to perform under existing PPAs. See Note 1 to the financial statements under "RevenuesConcentration of Revenue" in Item 8 herein for additional information on Pacific Gas & Electric Company's bankruptcy filing. Any significant loss of customers or reduction in demand for energy could have a material negative impact on a registrant's results of operations, financial condition, and liquidity.
Acquisitions, dispositions, or other strategic ventures or investments may not result in anticipated benefits and may present risks not originally contemplated, which may have a material adverse effect on the liquidity, results of operations, and financial condition of Southern Company and its subsidiaries.
Southern Company and its subsidiaries have made significant acquisitions and investments in the past, as well as recent dispositions, and may in the future make additional acquisitions, dispositions, or other strategic ventures or investments, including the pending disposition by Southern Power of Plant Mankato, which cannot be assured to be completed or beneficial to Southern Company or its subsidiaries. Southern Company and its subsidiaries continually seek opportunities to create value

I-33


through various transactions, including acquisitions or sales of assets. Specifically, Southern Power continually seeks opportunities to execute its strategy to create value through various transactions, including acquisitions, dispositions, and sales of partnership interests, development and construction of new generating facilities, and entry into PPAs primarily with investor-owned utilities, IPPs, municipalities, and other load-serving entities, as well as commercial and industrial customers.
Southern Company and its subsidiaries may face significant competition for transactional opportunities and anticipated transactions may not be completed on acceptable terms or at all. In addition, these transactions are intended to, but may not, result in the generation of cash or income, the realization of savings, the creation of efficiencies, or the reduction of risk. These transactions may also affect the liquidity, results of operations, and financial condition of Southern Company and its subsidiaries.
These transactions also involve risks, including:
they may not result in an increase in income or provide adequate or expected funds or return on capital or other anticipated benefits;
they may result in Southern Company or its subsidiaries entering into new or additional lines of $26 millionbusiness, which may have new or different business or operational risks;
they may not be successfully integrated into the acquiring company's operations and/or internal control processes;
the due diligence conducted prior to a transaction may not uncover situations that could result in annualfinancial or legal exposure or may not appropriately evaluate the likelihood or quantify the exposure from identified risks;
they may result in decreased earnings, revenues, or cash flow;
Southern Company, Southern Company Gas, and certain of their subsidiaries have retained obligations in connection with transitional agreements related to dispositions that subject these companies to additional risk;
Southern Company or the applicable subsidiary may not be able to achieve the expected financial benefits from the use of funds generated by any dispositions;
expected benefits of a transaction may be dependent on the cooperation or performance of a counterparty; or
for the traditional electric operating companies and Southern Company Gas, costs associated with such investments that were expected to be recovered through regulated rates may not be recoverable.
Southern Company and Southern Company Gas are holding companies and Southern Power owns many of its assets indirectly through subsidiaries. Each of these companies is dependent on cash flows from their respective subsidiaries to meet their ongoing and future financial obligations, including making interest and principal payments on outstanding indebtedness and, for Southern Company, to pay dividends on its common stock.
Southern Company and Southern Company Gas are holding companies and, as such, they have no operations of their own. Substantially all of Southern Company's and Southern Company Gas' and many of Southern Power's respective consolidated assets are held by subsidiaries. A significant portion of Southern Company Gas' debt is issued by its 100%-owned subsidiary, Southern Company Gas Capital, and is fully and unconditionally guaranteed by Southern Company Gas. Southern Company's, Southern Company Gas' and, to a certain extent, Southern Power's ability to meet their respective financial obligations, including making interest and principal payments on outstanding indebtedness, and, for Southern Company, to pay dividends on its common stock, is dependent on the net income and cash flows of their respective subsidiaries and the ability of those subsidiaries to pay upstream dividends or to repay borrowed funds. Prior to funding Southern Company, Southern Company Gas, or Southern Power, the respective subsidiaries have financial obligations and, with respect to Southern Company and Southern Company Gas, regulatory restrictions that must be satisfied, including among others, debt service and preferred stock dividends. These subsidiaries are separate legal entities and, except as described below, have no obligation to provide Southern Company, Southern Company Gas, or Southern Power with funds. Certain of Southern Power's assets are held through controlling interests in subsidiaries. In certain cases, distributions without partner consent are limited to available cash, and the subsidiaries are obligated to distribute all available cash to their owners each quarter. In addition, Southern Company, Southern Company Gas, and Southern Power may provide capital contributions or debt financing to subsidiaries under certain circumstances, which would reduce the funds available to meet their respective financial obligations, including making interest and principal payments on outstanding indebtedness, and to pay dividends on Southern Company's common stock.
A downgrade in the credit ratings of any of the registrants, Southern Company Gas Capital, or Nicor Gas could negatively affect their ability to access capital at reasonable costs and/or could require posting of collateral or replacing certain indebtedness.
There are a number of factors that rating agencies evaluate to arrive at credit ratings for the registrants, Southern Company Gas Capital, and Nicor Gas, including capital structure, regulatory environment, the ability to cover liquidity requirements, and other commitments for capital. The registrants, Southern Company Gas Capital, and Nicor Gas could experience a downgrade in their ratings if any rating agency concludes that the level of business or financial risk of the industry or the applicable company has deteriorated. Changes in ratings methodologies by the agencies could also have a negative impact on credit ratings. If one or more rating agencies downgrade any registrant, Southern Company Gas Capital, or Nicor Gas, borrowing

I-34


costs likely would increase, including automatic increases in interest rates under applicable term loans and credit facilities, the pool of investors and funding sources would likely decrease, and, particularly for any downgrade to below investment grade, significant collateral requirements may be triggered in a number of contracts. Any credit rating downgrades could require altering the mix of debt financing currently used, and could require the issuance of secured indebtedness and/or indebtedness with additional restrictive covenants binding the applicable company.
Uncertainty in demand for energy can result in lower earnings or higher costs. If demand for energy falls short of expectations, it could result in potentially stranded assets. If demand for energy exceeds expectations, it could result in increased costs forpurchasing capacity in the open market or building additional electric generation and transmissionfacilities or natural gas distribution and storage facilities.
Southern Company, the traditional electric operating companies, and Southern Power each engage in a long-term planning process to estimate the optimal mix and timing of new generation assets required to serve future load obligations. Southern Company Gas engages in a long-term planning process to estimate the optimal mix and timing of building new pipelines and storage facilities, replacing existing pipelines, rewatering storage facilities, and entering new markets and/or expanding in existing markets. These planning processes must look many years into the future in order to accommodate the long lead times associated with the permitting and construction of new generation and associated transmission facilities and natural gas distribution and storage facilities. Inherent risk exists in predicting demand as future loads are dependent on many uncertain factors, including economic conditions, customer usage patterns, efficiency programs, and customer technology adoption. Because regulators may not permit the traditional electric operating companies or Southern Company Gas' regulated operating companies to adjust rates to recover the costs of new generation and associated transmission assets and/or new pipelines and related infrastructure in a timely manner or at all, Southern Company and its subsidiaries may not be able to fully recover these costs or may have exposure to regulatory lag associated with the time between the incurrence of costs and the recovery in customers' rates. In addition, under Southern Power's model of selling capacity and energy at negotiated market-based rates under long-term PPAs, Southern Power might not be able to fully execute its business plan if market prices drop below original forecasts. Southern Power and/or the traditional electric operating companies may not be able to extend existing PPAs or find new buyers for existing generation assets as existing PPAs expire, or they may be forced to market these assets at prices lower than originally intended. These situations could have negative impacts on net income and cash flows for the affected registrant.
The traditional electric operating companies are currently obligated to supply power to retail customers and wholesale customers under long-term PPAs. Southern Power is currently obligated to supply power to wholesale customers under long-term PPAs. At peak times, the demand for power required to meet this obligation could exceed the Southern Company system's available generation capacity. Market or competitive forces may require that the traditional electric operating companies purchase capacity on the open market or build additional generation and transmission facilities and that Southern Power purchase energy or capacity on the open market. Because regulators may not permit the traditional electric operating companies to pass all of these purchase or construction costs on to their customers, the traditional electric operating companies may not be able to recover some or all of these costs or may have exposure to regulatory lag associated with the time between the incurrence of costs of purchased or constructed capacity and the traditional electric operating companies' recovery in customers' rates. Under Southern Power's long-term fixed price PPAs, Southern Power may not be able to recover all of these costs. These situations could have negative impacts on net income and cash flows for the affected registrant.
The businesses of the registrants, SEGCO, and Nicor Gas are dependent on their ability to successfully access funds through capital markets and financial institutions. Theinability of any of the registrants, SEGCO, or Nicor Gas to access funds may limit its ability to execute its business plan by impacting its ability to fund capital investments or acquisitions that it may otherwise rely on to achieve future earnings and cash flows.
The registrants, SEGCO, and Nicor Gas rely on access to both short-term money markets and longer-term capital markets as a significant source of liquidity for capital requirements not satisfied by the cash flow from their respective operations. If any of the registrants, SEGCO, or Nicor Gas is not able to access capital at competitive rates or on favorable terms, its ability to implement its business plan will be limited by impacting its ability to fund capital investments or acquisitions that it may otherwise rely on to achieve future earnings and cash flows. In addition, the registrants, SEGCO, and Nicor Gas rely on committed bank lending agreements as back-up liquidity which allows them to access low cost money markets. Each of the registrants, SEGCO, and Nicor Gas believes that it will maintain sufficient access to these financial markets based upon current credit ratings. However, certain events or market disruptions may increase the cost of borrowing or adversely affect the ability to raise capital through the issuance of securities or other borrowing arrangements or the ability to secure committed bank lending agreements used as back-up sources of capital. Such disruptions could include:
an economic downturn or uncertainty;
bankruptcy or financial distress at an unrelated energy company, financial institution, or sovereign entity;
capital markets volatility and disruption, either nationally or internationally;
changes in tax policy, including further interpretation and guidance on tax reform;

I-35


volatility in market prices for electricity and natural gas;
actual or threatened cyber or physical attacks on the Southern Company system's facilities or unrelated energy companies' facilities;
war or threat of war; or
the overall health of the utility and financial institution industries.
Georgia Power's ability to make future borrowings through its term loan credit facility with the FFB is subject to the satisfaction of customary conditions, as well as certification of compliance with the requirements of the loan guarantee program under Title XVII of the Energy Policy Act of 2005, including accuracy of project-related representations and warranties, delivery of updated project-related information and evidence of compliance with the prevailing wage requirements of the Davis-Bacon Act of 1931, as amended, and certification from the DOE's consulting engineer that proceeds of the advances are used to reimburse certain costs of construction relating to Plant Vogtle Units 3 and 4 that are eligible for financing under the Title XVII Loan Guarantee Program. Prior to obtaining any further advances under Georgia Power's loan guarantee agreement with the DOE, Georgia Power is required to obtain the DOE's approval of the Bechtel Agreement.
Failure to comply with debt covenants or conditions could adversely affect the ability of the registrants, SEGCO, Southern Company Gas Capital, or Nicor Gas to execute future borrowings.
The debt and credit agreements of the registrants, SEGCO, Southern Company Gas Capital, and Nicor Gas contain various financial and other covenants. Georgia Power's loan guarantee agreement with the DOE contains additional covenants, events of default, and mandatory prepayment events relating to the construction of Plant Vogtle Units 3 and 4. Failure to meet those covenants beyond applicable grace periods could result in accelerated due dates and/or termination of the agreements, which would negatively affect the applicable company's financial condition and liquidity.
Volatility in the securities markets, interest rates, and other factors could substantially increase defined benefit pension and other postretirement plan costs and the funding available for nuclear decommissioning.
The costs of providing pension and other postretirement benefit plans are dependent on a number of factors, such as the rates of return on plan assets, discount rates, the level of interest rates used to measure the required minimum funding levels of the plan, changes in actuarial assumptions, government regulations, and/or life expectancy, and the frequency and amount of the Southern Company system's required or voluntary contributions made to the plans. Changes in actuarial assumptions and differences between the assumptions and actual values, as well as a significant decline in the value of investments that fund the pension and other postretirement plans, if not offset or mitigated by a decline in plan liabilities, could increase pension and other postretirement expense, and the Southern Company system could be required from time to time to fund the pension plans with significant amounts of cash. Such cash funding obligations could have a material impact on liquidity by reducing cash flows and could negatively affect results of operations. Additionally, Alabama Power and Georgia Power each hold significant assets in their nuclear decommissioning trusts to satisfy obligations to decommission Alabama Power's and Georgia Power's nuclear plants. The rate of return on assets held in those trusts can significantly impact both the funding available for decommissioning and the funding requirements for the trusts.
The registrants are subject to risks associated with their ability to obtain adequate insurance at acceptable costs.
The financial condition of some insurance companies, actual or threatened physical or cyber attacks, and natural disasters, among other things, could have disruptive effects on insurance markets. The availability of insurance covering risks that the registrants and their respective competitors typically insure against may decrease, and the insurance that the registrants are able to obtain may have higher deductibles, higher premiums, and more restrictive policy terms. Further, the insurance policies may not cover all of the potential exposures or the actual amount of loss incurred.
Any losses not covered by insurance, or any increases in the cost of applicable insurance, could adversely affect the results of operations, cash flows, or financial condition of the affected registrant.
The use of derivative contracts by Southern Company and its subsidiaries in thenormal course of business could result in financial losses that negatively impact thenet income of the registrants or in reported net income volatility.
Southern Company and its subsidiaries use derivative instruments, such as swaps, options, futures, and forwards, to manage their commodity and interest rate exposures and, to a lesser extent, manage foreign currency exchange rate exposure and engage in limited trading activities. The registrants could recognize financial losses as a result of volatility in the market values of these contracts or if a counterparty fails to perform. These risks are managed through risk management policies, limits, and procedures, which might not work as planned and cannot entirely eliminate the risks associated with these activities. In addition, derivative contracts entered into for hedging purposes might not offset the underlying exposure being hedged as expected, resulting in financial losses. In the absence of actively quoted market prices and pricing information from external sources, the valuation of these financial instruments can involve management's judgment or use of estimates. The factors used in the valuation of these instruments become more difficult to predict and the calculations become less reliable further into the

I-36


future. As a result, changes in the underlying assumptions or use of alternative valuation methods could affect the reported fair value of these contracts.
In addition, Southern Company Gas utilizes derivative instruments to lock in economic value in wholesale gas services, which may not qualify as, or may not be designated as, hedges for accounting purposes. The difference in accounting treatment for the underlying position and the financial instrument used to hedge the value of the contract can cause volatility in reported net income of Southern Company and Southern Company Gas while the positions are open due to mark-to-market accounting.
Future impairments of goodwill or long-lived assets could have a material adverse effect on the registrants' results of operations.
Goodwill is assessed for impairment at least annually and more frequently if events or circumstances occur that would more likely than not reduce the fair value of a reporting unit below its carrying value and long-lived assets are assessed for impairment whenever events or circumstances indicate that an asset's carrying amount may not be recoverable. In connection with the completion of the Merger, the application of the acquisition method of accounting was pushed down to Southern Company Gas. The excess of the purchase price over the fair values of Southern Company Gas' assets and liabilities was recorded as goodwill. This resulted in a significant increase in the goodwill recorded on Southern Company's and Southern Company Gas' consolidated balance sheets. At December 31, 2018, goodwill was $5.3 billion and $5.0 billion for Southern Company and Southern Company Gas, respectively.
In addition, Southern Company and its subsidiaries have long-lived assets recorded on their balance sheets. To the extent the value of goodwill or long-lived assets become impaired, the affected registrant may be required to incur impairment charges that could have a material impact on their results of operations. For example, a wholly-owned subsidiary of Southern Company Gas owns and operates a natural gas storage facility consisting of two salt dome caverns where recent seismic mapping indicates that proximity of one of the caverns to the edge of the salt dome may be less than the required minimum and could result in Southern Company Gas retiring the cavern early. Early retirement of the cavern could trigger impairment of other long-lived assets associated with the natural gas storage facility. In addition, a subsidiary of Southern Company has several leveraged lease agreements, with terms ranging up to 45 years, which relate to international and domestic energy generation, distribution, and transportation assets. Southern Company receives federal income tax deductions for depreciation and amortization, as well as interest on long-term debt related to these investments. Southern Company reviews all important lease assumptions at least annually, or more frequently if events or changes in circumstances indicate that a change in assumptions has occurred or may occur. With respect to Southern Company's subsidiary's investments in leveraged leases, the recovery of its investment is dependent on the profitable operation of the leased assets by the respective lessees. A significant deterioration in the performance of the leased asset could result in the impairment of the related lease receivable.
Item 1B.UNRESOLVED STAFF COMMENTS.
None.

I-37

    Table of Contents                                Index to Financial Statements

NOTESItem 2. PROPERTIES
Electric
Electric Properties
The traditional electric operating companies, Southern Power, and SEGCO, at January 1, 2019, owned and/or operated 33 hydroelectric generating stations, 26 fossil fuel generating stations, three nuclear generating stations, 13 combined cycle/cogeneration stations, 40 solar facilities, nine wind facilities, and one biomass facility. The amounts of capacity for each company, at January 1, 2019, are shown in the table below.
Generating StationLocation
Nameplate
Capacity (1)

 
  (KWs)
 
FOSSIL STEAM   
GadsdenGadsden, AL120,000
 
GorgasJasper, AL1,021,250
(2)
BarryMobile, AL1,300,000
 
Greene CountyDemopolis, AL300,000
(3)
Gaston Unit 5Wilsonville, AL880,000
 
MillerBirmingham, AL2,532,288
(4)
Alabama Power Total 6,153,538
 
BowenCartersville, GA3,160,000
 
HammondRome, GA800,000
(5)
McIntoshEffingham County, GA163,117
(5)
SchererMacon, GA750,924
(6)
WansleyCarrollton, GA925,550
(7)
YatesNewnan, GA700,000
 
Georgia Power Total 6,499,591
 
DanielPascagoula, MS500,000
(8)
Greene CountyDemopolis, AL200,000
(3)
WatsonGulfport, MS750,000
 
Mississippi Power Total 1,450,000
 
Gaston Units 1-4Wilsonville, AL  
SEGCO Total 1,000,000
(9)
Total Fossil Steam 15,103,129
 
NUCLEAR STEAM   
FarleyDothan, AL  
Alabama Power Total 1,720,000
 
HatchBaxley, GA899,612
(10)
Vogtle Units 1 and 2Augusta, GA1,060,240
(11)
Georgia Power Total 1,959,852
 
Total Nuclear Steam 3,679,852
 

I-38


Generating StationLocation
Nameplate
Capacity (1)

 
COMBUSTION TURBINES   
Greene CountyDemopolis, AL  
Alabama Power Total 720,000
 
BoulevardSavannah, GA19,700
 
McDonough Unit 3Atlanta, GA78,800
 
McIntosh Units 1 through 8Effingham County, GA640,000
 
McManusBrunswick, GA481,700
 
RobinsWarner Robins, GA158,400
 
WansleyCarrollton, GA26,322
(7)
WilsonAugusta, GA354,100
 
Georgia Power Total 1,759,022
 
Chevron Cogenerating StationPascagoula, MS147,292
(12)
SweattMeridian, MS39,400
 
WatsonGulfport, MS39,360
 
Mississippi Power Total 226,052
 
AddisonThomaston, GA668,800
 
Cleveland CountyCleveland County, NC720,000
 
DahlbergJackson County, GA756,000
 
RowanSalisbury, NC455,250
 
Southern Power Total 2,600,050
 
Gaston (SEGCO)
Wilsonville, AL19,680
(9)
Total Combustion Turbines 5,324,804
 
COGENERATION   
Washington CountyWashington County, AL123,428
 
Lowndes CountyBurkeville, AL104,800
 
TheodoreTheodore, AL236,418
 
Alabama Power Total 464,646
 
COMBINED CYCLE   
BarryMobile, AL  
Alabama Power Total 1,070,424
 
McIntosh Units 10 and 11Effingham County, GA1,318,920
 
McDonough-Atkinson Units 4 through 6Atlanta, GA2,520,000
 
Georgia Power Total 3,838,920
 
DanielPascagoula, MS1,070,424
 
RatcliffeKemper County, MS769,898
(13)
Mississippi Power Total 1,840,322
 
FranklinSmiths, AL1,857,820
 
HarrisAutaugaville, AL1,318,920
 
MankatoMankato, MN375,000
(14)
RowanSalisbury, NC530,550
 
Wansley Units 6 and 7Carrollton, GA1,073,000
 
Southern Power Total 5,155,290
 
Total Combined Cycle 11,904,956
 

I-39


Generating StationLocation
Nameplate
Capacity (1)

 
HYDROELECTRIC FACILITIES   
BankheadHolt, AL53,985
 
BouldinWetumpka, AL225,000
 
HarrisWedowee, AL132,000
 
HenryOhatchee, AL72,900
 
HoltHolt, AL46,944
 
JordanWetumpka, AL100,000
 
LayClanton, AL177,000
 
Lewis SmithJasper, AL157,500
 
Logan MartinVincent, AL135,000
 
MartinDadeville, AL182,000
 
MitchellVerbena, AL170,000
 
ThurlowTallassee, AL81,000
 
WeissLeesburg, AL87,750
 
YatesTallassee, AL47,000
 
Alabama Power Total 1,668,079
 
Bartletts FerryColumbus, GA173,000
 
Goat RockColumbus, GA38,600
 
Lloyd ShoalsJackson, GA14,400
 
Morgan FallsAtlanta, GA16,800
 
North HighlandsColumbus, GA29,600
 
Oliver DamColumbus, GA60,000
 
Rocky MountainRome, GA215,256
(15)
Sinclair DamMilledgeville, GA45,000
 
Tallulah FallsClayton, GA72,000
 
TerroraClayton, GA16,000
 
TugaloClayton, GA45,000
 
Wallace DamEatonton, GA321,300
 
YonahToccoa, GA22,500
 
6 Other PlantsVarious Georgia locations18,080
 
Georgia Power Total 1,087,536
 
Total Hydroelectric Facilities 2,755,615
 

I-40


Generating StationLocation
Nameplate
Capacity (1)

 
RENEWABLE SOURCES:   
SOLAR FACILITIES   
Fort RuckerCalhoun County, AL10,560
 
Anniston Army DepotDale County, AL7,380
 
Alabama Power Total 17,940
 
Fort BenningColumbus, GA30,005
 
Fort GordonAugusta, GA30,000
 
Fort StewartFort Stewart, GA30,000
 
Kings BayCamden County, GA30,161
 
DaltonDalton, GA6,508
 
Marine Corps Logistics BaseAlbany, GA31,161
 
4 Other PlantsVarious Georgia locations5,171
 
Georgia Power Total 163,006
 
AdobeKern County, CA20,000
 
ApexNorth Las Vegas, NV20,000
 
Boulder IClark County, NV100,000
 
ButlerTaylor County, GA103,700
 
Butler Solar FarmTaylor County, GA22,000
 
CalipatriaImperial County, CA20,000
 
Campo VerdeImperial County, CA147,420
 
CimarronSpringer, NM30,640
 
Decatur CountyDecatur County, GA20,000
 
Decatur ParkwayDecatur County, GA84,000
 
Desert StatelineSan Bernadino County, CA299,900
 
East PecosPecos County, TX120,000
 
GarlandKern County, CA205,130
 
Gaskell West IKern County, CA20,000
 
GranvilleOxford, NC2,500
 
HenriettaKings County, CA102,000
 
Imperial ValleyImperial County, CA163,200
 
LamesaDawson County, TX102,000
 
Lost Hills - BlackwellKern County, CA33,440
 
Macho SpringsLuna County, NM55,000
 
Morelos del SolKern County, CA15,000
 
North StarFresno County, CA61,600
 
PawpawTaylor County, GA30,480
 
RoserockPecos County, TX160,000
 
RutherfordRutherford County, NC74,800
 
SandhillsTaylor County, GA146,890
 
SpectrumClark County, NV30,240
 
TranquillityFresno County, CA205,300
 
Southern Power Total 2,395,240
(16)
Total Solar 2,576,186
 

I-41


Generating StationLocation
Nameplate
Capacity (1)

 
WIND FACILITIES   
BethelCastro County, TX276,000
 
Cactus FlatsConcho County, TX148,350
 
Grant PlainsGrant County, OK147,200
 
Grant WindGrant County, OK151,800
 
Kay WindKay County, OK299,000
 
PassadumkeagPenobscot County, ME42,900
 
Salt ForkDonley & Gray Counties TX174,000
 
Tyler BluffCooke County, TX125,580
 
Wake WindCrosby & Floyd Counties, TX257,250
 
Southern Power Total 1,622,080
(17)
BIOMASS FACILITY   
NacogdochesSacul, TX  
Southern Power Total 115,500
 
    
Total Alabama Power Generating Capacity 11,814,627
 
Total Georgia Power Generating Capacity 15,307,927
 
Total Mississippi Power Generating Capacity 3,516,374
 
Total Southern Power Generating Capacity 11,888,160
 
Total Generating Capacity 43,546,768
 
Notes:
(1)See "Jointly-Owned Facilities" herein and Note 5 to the financial statements under "Joint Ownership Agreements" in Item 8 herein for additional information.
(2)As part of its environmental compliance strategy, Alabama Power plans to retire Plant Gorgas Units 8, 9, and 10 by April 15, 2019. See Note 2 to the financial statements under "Alabama Power – Environmental Accounting Order" in Item 8 herein for additional information.
(3)Owned by Alabama Power and Mississippi Power as tenants in common in the proportions of 60% and 40%, respectively. Capacity shown for each company represents its portion of total plant capacity.
(4)Capacity shown is Alabama Power's portion (95.92%) of total plant capacity.
(5)Georgia Power has requested to decertify and retire Plant Hammond Units 1 through 4 and Plant McIntosh Unit 1 upon approval of its 2019 IRP filing. See Note 2 to the financial statements under "Georgia Power – Integrated Resource Plan" in Item 8 herein for additional information.
(6)Capacity shown for Georgia Power is 8.4% of Units 1 and 2 and 75% of Unit 3.
(7)Capacity shown is Georgia Power's portion (53.5%) of total plant capacity.
(8)Capacity shown is Mississippi Power's portion (50%) of total plant capacity.
(9)SEGCO is jointly-owned by Alabama Power and Georgia Power. See BUSINESS in Item 1 herein for additional information. Also see Note 7 to the financial statements under "SEGCO" in Item 8 herein.
(10)Capacity shown is Georgia Power's portion (50.1%) of total plant capacity.
(11)Capacity shown is Georgia Power's portion (45.7%) of total plant capacity.
(12)Generation is dedicated to a single industrial customer. See MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS – FINANCIAL CONDITION AND LIQUIDITY – "Credit Rating Risk" of Mississippi Power in Item 7 herein.
(13)The capacity shown is the gross capacity using natural gas fuel without supplemental firing.
(14)On November 5, 2018, Southern Power entered into an agreement with Northern States Power to sell all of its equity interests in Plant Mankato (including the 385-MW expansion currently under construction). The ultimate outcome of this matter cannot be determined at this time. See Note 15 to the financial statements under "Southern Power – Sales of Natural Gas Plants" in Item 8 herein for additional information.
(15)Capacity shown is Georgia Power's portion (25.4%) of total plant capacity. OPC operates the plant.
(16)In May 2018, Southern Power sold a noncontrolling 33% equity interest in SP Solar (a limited partnership indirectly owning all of Southern Power's solar facilities, except the Roserock and Gaskell West facilities). SP Solar is the 51% majority owner of Boulder 1, Garland, Henrietta, Imperial Valley, Lost Hills Blackwell, North Star, and Tranquillity; the 66% majority owner of Desert Stateline; and the sole owner of the remaining SP Solar facilities. Southern Power is the 51% majority owner of Roserock and also the controlling partner in a tax equity partnership owning Gaskell West. All of these entities are consolidated subsidiaries of Southern Power and the capacity shown in the table is 100% of the nameplate capacity for the respective facility.
(17)In December 2018, Southern Power sold a noncontrolling tax equity interest in SP Wind (which owns all of Southern Power's wind facilities, except Cactus Flats). SP Wind is the 90.1% majority owner of Wake Wind and owns 100% of the remaining SP Wind facilities. Southern Power is the controlling partner in a tax equity partnership owning Cactus Flats. All of these entities are consolidated subsidiaries of Southern Power and the capacity shown in the table is 100% of the nameplate capacity for the respective facility.

I-42


Except as discussed below under "Titles to Property," the principal plants and other important units of the traditional electric operating companies, Southern Power, and SEGCO are owned in fee by the respective companies. It is the opinion of management of each such company that its operating properties are adequately maintained and are substantially in good operating condition, and suitable for their intended purpose.
Mississippi Power owns a 79-mile length of 500-kilovolt transmission line which is leased to Entergy Gulf States Louisiana, LLC. The line extends from Plant Daniel to the Louisiana state line. Entergy Gulf States Louisiana, LLC is paying a use fee over a 40-year period through 2024 covering all expenses and the amortization of the original cost. At December 31, 2018, the unamortized portion was approximately $12 million.
Mississippi Power owns a lignite mine and equipment that were intended to provide fuel for the Kemper IGCC. Mississippi Power also has acquired mineral reserves located around the Kemper County energy facility. Liberty Fuels Company, LLC, the operator of the mine, has a legal obligation to perform mine reclamation and Mississippi Power has a contractual obligation to fund all reclamation activities. As a result of the abandonment of the Kemper IGCC, final mine reclamation began in 2018 and is expected to be substantially completed in 2020, with monitoring expected to continue through 2027. Mississippi Power is currently evaluating its options regarding the final disposition of the CO2 pipeline, including removal of the pipeline. This evaluation is expected to be complete later in 2019. The ultimate outcome of these matters cannot be determined at this time. See Note 2 to the financial statements under "Mississippi Power – Kemper County Energy Facility – Lignite Mine and CO2 Pipeline Facilities" in Item 8 herein for additional information on the lignite mine and CO2 pipeline.
In August 2018, Mississippi Power filed a RMP which identified alternatives that, if implemented, could impact Mississippi Power's generating stations as well as Plant Greene County, jointly owned by Mississippi Power and Alabama Power. See BUSINESS in Item 1 herein under "Rate Matters – Integrated Resource Planning – Mississippi Power" for additional information.
In conjunction with Southern Company's sale of Gulf Power, Mississippi Power and Gulf Power have committed to seek a restructuring of their 50% undivided ownership interests in Plant Daniel such that each of them would, after the restructuring, own 100% of a generating unit. On January 15, 2019, Gulf Power provided notice to Mississippi Power that Gulf Power will retire its share of the generating capacity of Plant Daniel on January 15, 2024. Mississippi Power has the option to purchase Gulf Power's ownership interest for $1 on January 15, 2024, provided that Mississippi Power exercises the option no later than 120 days prior to that date. Mississippi Power is assessing the potential operational and economic effects of Gulf Power's notice. The ultimate outcome of these matters remains subject to completion of Mississippi Power's evaluations and applicable regulatory approvals, including the FERC and the Mississippi PSC, and cannot now be determined. See Note 15 to the financial statements under "Southern Company's Sale of Gulf Power" in Item 8 herein for information regarding the sale of Gulf Power.
In 2018, the maximum demand on the traditional electric operating companies, Southern Power Company, and SEGCO was 36,429,000 KWs and occurred on January 18, 2018. The all-time maximum demand of 38,777,000 KWs on the traditional electric operating companies, Southern Power Company, and SEGCO occurred on August 22, 2007. These amounts exclude demand served by capacity retained by MEAG Power, OPC, and SEPA. The reserve margin for the traditional electric operating companies, Southern Power Company, and SEGCO in 2018 was 29.8%. See SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA in Item 6 herein for additional information.
Jointly-Owned Facilities
Alabama Power, Georgia Power, and Mississippi Power at January 1, 2019 had undivided interests in certain generating plants and other related facilities with non-affiliated parties. The percentages of ownership of the total plant or facility are as follows:
    Percentage Ownership  
  
Total
Capacity
 
Alabama
Power
 
Power
South
 
Georgia
Power
 
Mississippi
Power
 OPC 
MEAG
Power
 Dalton 
Gulf
Power
  (MWs)                
Plant Miller Units 1 and 2 1,320
 91.8% 8.2% % % % % % %
Plant Hatch 1,796
 
 
 50.1
 
 30.0
 17.7
 2.2
 
Plant Vogtle Units 1 and 2 2,320
 
 
 45.7
 
 30.0
 22.7
 1.6
 
Plant Scherer Units 1 and 2 1,636
 
 
 8.4
 
 60.0
 30.2
 1.4
 
Plant Scherer Unit 3 818
 
 
 75.0
 
 
 
 
 25.0
Plant Wansley 1,779
 
 
 53.5
 
 30.0
 15.1
 1.4
 
Rocky Mountain 903
 
 
 25.4
 
 74.6
 
 
 
Plant Daniel Units 1 and 2 1,000
 
 
 
 50.0
 
 
 
 50.0

I-43


Alabama Power, Georgia Power, and Mississippi Power have contracted to operate and maintain the respective units in which each has an interest (other than Rocky Mountain) as agent for the joint owners. Southern Nuclear operates and provides services to Alabama Power's and Georgia Power's nuclear plants.
In addition, Georgia Power has commitments regarding a portion of a 5% interest in Plant Vogtle Units 1 and 2 owned by MEAG Power that are in effect until the later of retirement of the plant or the latest stated maturity date of MEAG Power's bonds issued to finance such ownership interest. The payments for capacity are required whether any capacity is available. The energy cost is a function of each unit's variable operating costs. Except for the portion of the capacity payments related to the Georgia PSC's disallowances of Plant Vogtle Units 1 and 2 costs, the cost of such capacity and energy is included in purchased power from non-affiliates in Georgia Power's statements of income in Item 8 herein. Also see Note 9 to the financial statements under "Fuel and Power Purchase Agreements" in Item 8 herein for additional information.
Construction continues on Plant Vogtle Units 3 and 4, which are jointly owned by the Vogtle Owners (with each owner holding the same undivided ownership interest as shown in the table above with respect to Plant Vogtle Units 1 and 2). See Note 2 to the financial statements under "Georgia PowerNuclear Construction" in Item 8 herein.
On December 4, 2018, Southern Power completed the sale of its 65% ownership interest in Plant Stanton Unit A, which Southern Power previously jointly-owned with OUC, FMPA, and KUA, to NextEra Energy. See Note 15 to the financial statements under "Southern PowerSales of Natural Gas Plants" in Item 8 herein for additional information.
Titles to Property
The traditional electric operating companies', Southern Power's, and SEGCO's interests in the principal plants and other important units of the respective companies are owned in fee by such companies, subject to the following major encumbrances: (1) liens pursuant to the assumption of debt obligations by Mississippi Power in connection with the acquisition of Plant Daniel Units 3 and 4, (2) a leasehold interest granted by Mississippi Power's largest retail customer, Chevron Products Company (Chevron), at the Chevron refinery, on which five combustion turbines of Mississippi Power are located, (3) liens pursuant to the agreements entered into with Chevron in October 2017 on Mississippi Power's co-generation assets located at the Chevron refinery, (4) liens associated with Georgia Power's reimbursement obligations to the DOE under its loan guarantee, which are secured by a first priority lien on (a) Georgia Power's 45.7% undivided ownership interest in Plant Vogtle Units 3 and 4 and (b) Georgia Power's rights and obligations under the principal contracts relating to Plant Vogtle Units 3 and 4, and (5) liens associated with two PPAs assumed as part of the acquisition of Plant Mankato in 2016 by Southern Power Company. See Note 5 to the financial statements under "Assets Subject to Lien," Note 8 to the financial statements under "Secured Debt" and "Long-term DebtDOE Loan Guarantee Borrowings," and Note 15 to the financial statements under "Southern PowerSales of Natural Gas Plants" in Item 8 herein for additional information. The traditional electric operating companies own the fee interests in certain of their principal plants as tenants in common. See "Jointly-Owned Facilities" herein and Note 5 to the financial statements under "Joint Ownership Agreements" in Item 8 herein for additional information. Properties such as electric transmission and distribution lines, steam heating mains, and gas pipelines are constructed principally on rights-of-way, which are maintained under franchise or are held by easement only. A substantial portion of lands submerged by reservoirs is held under flood right easements. In addition, certain of the renewable generating facilities occupy or use real property that is not owned, primarily through various leases, easements, rights-of-way, permits, or licenses from private landowners or governmental entities.
Natural Gas
Southern Company Gas considers its properties to be adequately maintained, substantially in good operating condition, and suitable for their intended purpose. The following provides the location and general character of the materially important properties that are used by the segments of Southern Company Gas. Substantially all of Nicor Gas' properties are subject to the lien of the indenture securing its first mortgage bonds. See Note 8 to the financial statements under "Long-term DebtOther Long-Term DebtSouthern Company Gas" in Item 8 herein for additional information.
Distribution and Transmission Mains – Southern Company Gas' distribution systems transport natural gas from its pipeline suppliers to customers in its service areas. These systems consist primarily of distribution and transmission mains, compressor stations, peak shaving/storage plants, service lines, meters, and regulators. At December 31, 2018, Southern Company Gas' gas distribution operations segment owned approximately 75,200 miles of underground distribution and transmission mains, which are located on easements or rights-of-way that generally provide for perpetual use.
Storage Assets – Gas Distribution Operations– Southern Company Gas owns and operates eight underground natural gas storage fields in Illinois with a total working capacity of approximately 150 Bcf, approximately 135 Bcf of which is usually cycled on an annual basis. This system is designed to meet about 50% of the estimated peak-day deliveries and approximately 40% of the normal winter deliveries in Illinois. This level of storage capability provides Nicor Gas with supply flexibility, improves the reliability of deliveries, and helps mitigate the risk associated with seasonal price movements.

I-44


Southern Company Gas also has four LNG plants located in Georgia and Tennessee with total LNG storage capacity of approximately 7.4 Bcf. In addition, Southern Company Gas owns two propane storage facilities in Virginia, each with storage capacity of approximately 0.3 Bcf. The LNG plants and propane storage facility are used by Southern Company Gas' gas distribution operations segment to supplement natural gas supply during peak usage periods.
Storage Assets – All Other– Southern Company Gas subsidiaries own three high-deliverability natural gas storage and hub facilities that are included in the all other segment. Jefferson Island Storage & Hub, LLC operates a storage facility in Louisiana consisting of two salt dome gas storage caverns. Golden Triangle Storage, Inc. operates a storage facility in Texas consisting of two salt dome caverns. Central Valley Gas Storage, LLC operates a depleted field storage facility in California. In addition, Southern Company Gas has a LNG facility in Alabama that produces LNG for Pivotal LNG, Inc. to support its business of selling LNG as a substitute fuel in various markets.
In August 2017, in connection with an ongoing integrity project into the salt dome gas storage caverns in Louisiana, updated seismic mapping indicated the proximity of one of the caverns to the edge of the salt dome may be less than the required minimum and could result in Southern Company Gas retiring the cavern early. See FUTURE EARNINGS POTENTIAL – "Other Matters" of Southern Company Gas in Item 7 herein and Note 3 to the financial statements under "Other MattersSouthern Company Gas" in Item 8 herein for additional information.
Jointly-Owned Properties– Southern Company Gas' gas pipeline investments segment has a 50% undivided ownership interest in a 115-mile pipeline facility in northwest Georgia that was placed in service in August 2017. Southern Company Gas also has an agreement to lease its 50% undivided ownership in the pipeline facility. See Note 5 to the financial statements under "Joint Ownership Agreements" in Item 8 herein for additional information.
Southern Company Gas owns a 50% interest in a LNG liquefaction and storage facility in Jacksonville, Florida, which was placed in service in October 2018 and is included in the all other segment. The facility is outfitted with a 2.0 million gallon storage tank with the capacity to produce in excess of 120,000 gallons of LNG per day.

I-45


Item 3.LEGAL PROCEEDINGS
See Note 3 to the financial statements in Item 8 herein for descriptions of legal and administrative proceedings discussed therein.
Item 4.MINE SAFETY DISCLOSURES
Not applicable.

I-46


EXECUTIVE OFFICERS OF SOUTHERN COMPANY
(Identification of executive officers of Southern Company is inserted in Part I in accordance with Regulation S-K, Item 401(b), Instruction 3.) The ages of the officers set forth below are as of December 31, 2018.
Thomas A. Fanning
Chairman, President, and Chief Executive Officer
Age 61
First elected in 2003. Chairman and Chief Executive Officer since December 2010 and President since August 2010.
Andrew W. Evans
Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
Age 52
First elected in 2016. Executive Vice President since July 2016 and Chief Financial Officer since June 2018. Previously served as Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of Southern Company Gas' Board of Directors from January 2016 through June 2018, President of Southern Company Gas from May 2015 through June 2018, Chief Operating Officer of Southern Company Gas from May 2015 through December 2015, and Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of Southern Company Gas from May 2006 through May 2015.
W. Paul Bowers
Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer of Georgia Power
Age 62
First elected in 2001. Chief Executive Officer, President, and Director of Georgia Power since January 2011. Chairman of Georgia Power's Board of Directors since May 2014.
S. W. Connally, Jr.
Executive Vice President of SCS
Age 49
First elected in 2012. Executive Vice President for Operations of SCS since June 2018. Previously served as President, Chief Executive Officer, and Director of Gulf Power from July 2012 through December 2018 and Chairman of Gulf Power's Board of Directors from July 2015 through December 2018.
Mark A. Crosswhite
Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer of Alabama Power
Age 56
First elected in 2010. President, Chief Executive Officer, and Director of Alabama Power since March 2014. Chairman of Alabama Power's Board of Directors since May 2014. Previously served as Executive Vice President and Chief Operating Officer of Southern Company from July 2012 through February 2014.
Kimberly S. Greene
Chairman, President, and Chief Executive Officer of Southern Company Gas
Age 52
First elected in 2013. Chairman, President, and Chief Executive Officer of Southern Company Gas since June 2018. Director of Southern Company Gas since July 2016. Previously served as Executive Vice President and Chief Operating Officer of Southern Company from March 2014 through June 2018 and President and Chief Executive Officer of SCS from April 2013 through February 2014.
James Y. Kerr II
Executive Vice President, Chief Legal Officer, and Chief Compliance Officer
Age 54
First elected in 2014. Executive Vice President, Chief Legal Officer (formerly known as General Counsel), and Chief Compliance Officer since March 2014. Before joining Southern Company, Mr. Kerr was a partner with McGuireWoods LLP and a senior advisor at McGuireWoods Consulting LLC from 2008 through February 2014.
Stephen E. Kuczynski
Chairman, President, and Chief Executive Officer of Southern Nuclear
Age 56
First elected in 2011. Chairman, President, and Chief Executive Officer of Southern Nuclear since July 2011.

I-47


Mark S. Lantrip
Executive Vice President
Age 64
First elected in 2014. Executive Vice President since February 2019. Chairman, President, and Chief Executive Officer of SCS since March 2014 and Chairman, President, and Chief Executive Officer of Southern Power since March 2018. Previously served as Treasurer of Southern Company from October 2007 to February 2014 and Executive Vice President of SCS from November 2010 to March 2014.
Anthony L. Wilson
Chairman, President, and Chief Executive Officer of Mississippi Power
Age 54
First elected in 2015. President of Mississippi Power since October 2015 and Chief Executive Officer and Director since January 2016. Chairman of Mississippi Power's Board of Directors since August 2016. Previously served as Executive Vice President of Mississippi Power from May 2015 to October 2015 and Executive Vice President of Georgia Power from January 2012 to May 2015.
Christopher C. Womack
Executive Vice President
Age 60
First elected in 2008. Executive Vice President and President of External Affairs since January 2009.
The officers of Southern Company were elected at the first meeting of the directors following the last annual meeting of stockholders held on May 23, 2018, for a term of one year or until their successors are elected and have qualified, except for Mr. Lantrip, whose election as Executive Vice President was effective February 11, 2019.


I-48


EXECUTIVE OFFICERS OF ALABAMA POWER
(Identification of executive officers of Alabama Power is inserted in Part I in accordance with Regulation S-K, Item 401(b), Instruction 3.) The ages of the officers set forth below are as of December 31, 2018.
Mark A. Crosswhite
Chairman, President, and Chief Executive Officer
Age 56
First elected in 2014. President, Chief Executive Officer, and Director since March 1, 2014. Chairman since May 2014. Previously served as Executive Vice President and Chief Operating Officer of Southern Company from July 2012 through February 2014.
Greg J. Barker
Executive Vice President
Age 55
First elected in 2016. Executive Vice President for Customer Services since February 2016. Previously served as Senior Vice President of Marketing and Economic Development from April 2012 to February 2016.
Philip C. Raymond
Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer, and Treasurer
Age 59
First elected in 2010. Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer, and Treasurer since August 2010.
Zeke W. Smith
Executive Vice President
Age 59
First elected in 2010. Executive Vice President of External Affairs since November 2010.
James P. Heilbron
Senior Vice President and Senior Production Officer
Age 47
First elected in 2013. Senior Vice President and Senior Production Officer of Alabama Power since March 2013 and Senior Vice President and Senior Production Officer – West of SCS and Senior Production Officer of Mississippi Power since October 2018.
R. Scott Moore
Senior Vice President
Age 51
First elected in 2017. Senior Vice President of Power Delivery since May 2017. Previously served as Vice President of Transmission from August 2012 to May 2017.
The officers of Alabama Power were elected at the meeting of the directors held on April 27, 2018 for a term of one year or until their successors are elected and have qualified.

I-49


PART II

Item 5.MARKET FOR REGISTRANTS' COMMON EQUITY, RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS AND ISSUER PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES
(a)(1) The common stock of Southern Company is listed and traded on the NYSE under the ticker symbol SO. The common stock is also traded on regional exchanges across the U.S.
There is no market for the other registrants' common stock, all of which is owned by Southern Company.
(a)(2) Number of Southern Company's common stockholders of record at January 31, 2019: 115,847
Each of the other registrants have one common stockholder, Southern Company.
(a)(3) Securities authorized for issuance under equity compensation plans.
See Part III, Item 12. Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters.
(b) Use of Proceeds
Not applicable.
(c) Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities
None.

Item 6.SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA

SELECTED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL AND OPERATING DATA 2014-2018
Southern Company and Subsidiary Companies 2018 Annual Report
 2018
 2017
 
2016(d)

 2015
 2014
Operating Revenues (in millions)$23,495
 $23,031
 $19,896
 $17,489
 $18,467
Total Assets (in millions)(a)
$116,914
 $111,005
 $109,697
 $78,318
 $70,233
Gross Property Additions (in millions)$8,205
 $5,984
 $7,624
 $6,169
 $6,522
Return on Average Common Equity (percent)(b)
9.11
 3.44
 10.80
 11.68
 10.08
Cash Dividends Paid Per Share of
 Common Stock
$2.3800
 $2.3000
 $2.2225
 $2.1525
 $2.0825
Consolidated Net Income Attributable to
   Southern Company (in millions)(b)
$2,226
 $842
 $2,448
 $2,367
 $1,963
Earnings Per Share —         
Basic$2.18
 $0.84
 $2.57
 $2.60
 $2.19
Diluted2.17
 0.84
 2.55
 2.59
 2.18
Capitalization (in millions):         
Common stockholders' equity$24,723
 $24,167
 $24,758
 $20,592
 $19,949
Preferred and preference stock of subsidiaries and
   noncontrolling interests
4,316
 1,361
 1,854
 1,390
 977
Redeemable preferred stock of subsidiaries291
 324
 118
 118
 375
Redeemable noncontrolling interests
 
 164
 43
 39
Long-term debt(a)(c)
40,736
 44,462
 42,629
 24,688
 20,644
Total (excluding amounts due within one year)(c)
$70,066
 $70,314
 $69,523
 $46,831
 $41,984
Capitalization Ratios (percent):         
Common stockholders' equity35.3
 34.4
 35.6
 44.0
 47.5
Preferred and preference stock of subsidiaries and
   noncontrolling interests
6.2
 1.9
 2.7
 3.0
 2.3
Redeemable preferred stock of subsidiaries0.4
 0.5
 0.2
 0.3
 0.9
Redeemable noncontrolling interests
 
 0.2
 0.1
 0.1
Long-term debt(a)(c)
58.1
 63.2
 61.3
 52.6
 49.2
Total (excluding amounts due within one year)(c)
100.0
 100.0
 100.0
 100.0
 100.0
Other Common Stock Data:         
Book value per share$23.91
 $23.99
 $25.00
 $22.59
 $21.98
Market price per share:         
High$49.43
 $53.51
 $54.64
 $53.16
 $51.28
Low42.38
 46.71
 46.00
 41.40
 40.27
Close (year-end)43.92
 48.09
 49.19
 46.79
 49.11
Market-to-book ratio (year-end) (percent)183.7
 200.5
 196.8
 207.2
 223.4
Price-earnings ratio (year-end) (times)20.1
 57.3
 19.1
 18.0
 22.4
Dividends paid (in millions)$2,425
 $2,300
 $2,104
 $1,959
 $1,866
Dividend yield (year-end) (percent)5.4
 4.8
 4.5
 4.6
 4.2
Dividend payout ratio (percent)108.9
 273.2
 86.0
 82.7
 95.0
Shares outstanding (in thousands):         
Average1,020,247
 1,000,336
 951,332
 910,024
 897,194
Year-end1,033,788
 1,007,603
 990,394
 911,721
 907,777
Stockholders of record (year-end)116,135
 120,803
 126,338
 131,771
 137,369
(a)A reclassification of debt issuance costs from Total Assets to Long-term debt of $202 million and a reclassification of deferred tax assets from Total Assets to Accumulated deferred income taxes of $488 million is reflected for 2014, in accordance with new accounting standards adopted in 2015 and applied retrospectively.
(b)Georgia Power recorded a pre-tax estimated probable loss of $1.1 billion ($0.8 billion after tax) in the second quarter 2018 to reflect its revised estimate to complete construction and start-up of Plant Vogtle Units 3 and 4. In addition, a significant loss to income was recorded by Mississippi Power related to the suspension of the Kemper IGCC in June 2017. Earnings in all periods presented were impacted by losses related to the Kemper IGCC. See Note 2 to the financial statements in Item 8 herein for additional information.
(c)Amounts related to Gulf Power have been reclassified to liabilities held for sale at December 31, 2018. See Note 15 to the financial statements under "Southern Company's Sale of Gulf Power" in Item 8 herein for additional information.
(d)The 2016 selected financial and operating data includes the operations of Southern Company Gas from the date of the Merger, July 1, 2016, through December 31, 2016. See Note 15 to the financial statements under "Southern Company Merger with Southern Company Gas" in Item 8 herein for additional information.

SELECTED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL AND OPERATING DATA 2014-2018 (continued)
Southern Company and Subsidiary Companies 20172018 Annual Report
 2018
 2017
 
2016(a)

 2015
 2014
Operating Revenues (in millions):         
Residential$6,608
 $6,515
 $6,614
 $6,383
 $6,499
Commercial5,266
 5,439
 5,394
 5,317
 5,469
Industrial3,224
 3,262
 3,171
 3,172
 3,449
Other124
 114
 55
 115
 133
Total retail15,222
 15,330
 15,234
 14,987
 15,550
Wholesale2,516
 2,426
 1,926
 1,798
 2,184
Total revenues from sales of electricity17,738
 17,756
 17,160
 16,785
 17,734
Natural gas revenues3,854
 3,791
 1,596
 
 
Other revenues1,903
 1,484
 1,140
 704
 733
Total$23,495
 $23,031
 $19,896
 $17,489
 $18,467
Kilowatt-Hour Sales (in millions):         
Residential54,590
 50,536
 53,337
 52,121
 53,347
Commercial53,451
 52,340
 53,733
 53,525
 53,243
Industrial53,341
 52,785
 52,792
 53,941
 54,140
Other799
 846
 883
 897
 909
Total retail162,181
 156,507
 160,745
 160,484
 161,639
Wholesale sales49,963
 49,034
 37,043
 30,505
 32,786
Total212,144
 205,541
 197,788
 190,989
 194,425
Average Revenue Per Kilowatt-Hour (cents):         
Residential12.10
 12.89
 12.40
 12.25
 12.18
Commercial9.85
 10.39
 10.04
 9.93
 10.27
Industrial6.04
 6.18
 6.01
 5.88
 6.37
Total retail9.39
 9.80
 9.48
 9.34
 9.62
Wholesale5.04
 4.95
 5.20
 5.89
 6.66
Total sales8.36
 8.64
 8.68
 8.79
 9.12
Average Annual Kilowatt-Hour         
Use Per Residential Customer12,514
 11,618
 12,387
 13,318
 13,765
Average Annual Revenue         
Per Residential Customer$1,555
 $1,498
 $1,541
 $1,630
 $1,679
Plant Nameplate Capacity         
Ratings (year-end) (megawatts)45,824
 46,936
 46,291
 44,223
 46,549
Maximum Peak-Hour Demand (megawatts):         
Winter36,429
 31,956
 32,272
 36,794
 37,234
Summer34,841
 34,874
 35,781
 36,195
 35,396
System Reserve Margin (at peak) (percent)29.8
 30.8
 34.2
 33.2
 19.8
Annual Load Factor (percent)61.2
 61.4
 61.5
 59.9
 59.6
Plant Availability (percent):         
Fossil-steam81.4
 84.5
 86.4
 86.1
 85.8
Nuclear94.0
 94.7
 93.3
 93.5
 91.5
(a)The 2016 selected financial and operating data includes the operations of Southern Company Gas from the date of the Merger, July 1, 2016, through December 31, 2016. See Note 15 to the financial statements under "Southern Company Merger with Southern Company Gas" in Item 8 herein for additional information.

performance adjusted ROESELECTED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL AND OPERATING DATA 2014-2018 (continued)
Southern Company and Subsidiary Companies 2018 Annual Report
 2018
 2017
 
2016(a)

 2015
 2014
Source of Energy Supply (percent):         
Gas41.6
 41.9
 41.7
 42.7
 37.0
Coal27.0
 27.0
 30.3
 32.3
 39.3
Nuclear13.8
 14.5
 14.5
 15.2
 14.8
Hydro2.9
 2.1
 2.1
 2.6
 2.5
Other5.4
 5.4
 2.4
 0.8
 0.4
Purchased power9.3
 9.1
 9.0
 6.4
 6.0
Total100.0
 100.0
 100.0
 100.0
 100.0
Gas Sales Volumes (mmBtu in millions):         
Firm791
 729
 296
 
 
Interruptible109
 109
 53
 
 
Total900
 838
 349
 
 
Traditional Electric Operating Company
   Customers (year-end) (in thousands):
         
Residential4,053
 4,011
 3,970
 3,928
 3,890
Commercial(b)
603
 599
 595
 590
 586
Industrial(b)
17
 18
 17
 17
 17
Other12
 12
 11
 11
 11
Total electric customers4,685
 4,640
 4,593
 4,546
 4,504
Gas distribution operations customers4,248
 4,623
 4,586
 
 
Total utility customers8,933
 9,263
 9,179
 4,546
 4,504
Employees (year-end)30,286
 31,344
 32,015
 26,703
 26,369
(a)The 2016 selected financial and operating data includes the operations of Southern Company Gas from the date of the Merger, July 1, 2016, through December 31, 2016. See Note 15 to the financial statements under "Southern Company Merger with Southern Company Gas" in Item 8 herein for additional information.
(b)A reclassification of customers from commercial to industrial is reflected for years 2014-2015 to be consistent with the rate structure approved by the Georgia PSC. The impact to operating revenues, kilowatt-hour sales, and average revenue per kilowatt-hour by class is not material.


SELECTED FINANCIAL AND OPERATING DATA 2014-2018
Alabama Power Company 2018 Annual Report
 2018
 2017
 2016
 2015
 2014
Operating Revenues (in millions)$6,032
 $6,039
 $5,889
 $5,768
 $5,942
Net Income After Dividends
on Preferred and Preference Stock (in millions)
$930
 $848
 $822
 $785
 $761
Cash Dividends on Common Stock (in millions)$801
 $714
 $765
 $571
 $550
Return on Average Common Equity (percent)13.00
 12.89
 13.34
 13.37
 13.52
Total Assets (in millions)(*)
$26,730
 $23,864
 $22,516
 $21,721
 $20,493
Gross Property Additions (in millions)$2,273
 $1,949
 $1,338
 $1,492
 $1,543
Capitalization (in millions):         
Common stockholder's equity$7,477
 $6,829
 $6,323
 $5,992
 $5,752
Preference stock
 
 196
 196
 343
Redeemable preferred stock291
 291
 85
 85
 342
Long-term debt(*)
7,923
 7,628
 6,535
 6,654
 6,137
Total (excluding amounts due within one year)$15,691
 $14,748
 $13,139
 $12,927
 $12,574
Capitalization Ratios (percent):         
Common stockholder's equity47.7
 46.3
 48.1
 46.4
 45.8
Preference stock
 
 1.5
 1.5
 2.7
Redeemable preferred stock1.9
 2.0
 0.7
 0.7
 2.7
Long-term debt(*)
50.4
 51.7
 49.7
 51.4
 48.8
Total (excluding amounts due within one year)100.0
 100.0
 100.0
 100.0
 100.0
Customers (year-end):         
Residential1,273,526
 1,268,271
 1,262,752
 1,253,875
 1,247,061
Commercial200,032
 199,840
 199,146
 197,920
 197,082
Industrial6,158
 6,171
 6,090
 6,056
 6,032
Other760
 766
 762
 757
 753
Total1,480,476
 1,475,048
 1,468,750
 1,458,608
 1,450,928
Employees (year-end)6,650
 6,613
 6,805
 6,986
 6,935
(*)A reclassification of debt issuance costs from Total Assets to Long-term debt of $40 million and a reclassification of deferred tax assets from Total Assets to Accumulated deferred income taxes of $20 million is reflected for 2014, in accordance with new accounting standards adopted in 2015 and applied retrospectively.

























SELECTED FINANCIAL AND OPERATING DATA 2014-2018 (continued)
Alabama Power Company 2018 Annual Report
 2018
 2017
 2016
 2015
 2014
Operating Revenues (in millions):
         
Residential$2,335
 $2,302
 $2,322
 $2,207
 $2,209
Commercial1,578
 1,649
 1,627
 1,564
 1,533
Industrial1,428
 1,477
 1,416
 1,436
 1,480
Other26
 30
 (43) 27
 27
Total retail5,367
 5,458
 5,322
 5,234
 5,249
Wholesale — non-affiliates279
 276
 283
 241
 281
Wholesale — affiliates119
 97
 69
 84
 189
Total revenues from sales of electricity5,765
 5,831
 5,674
 5,559
 5,719
Other revenues267
 208
 215
 209
 223
Total$6,032
 $6,039
 $5,889
 $5,768
 $5,942
Kilowatt-Hour Sales (in millions):
         
Residential18,626
 17,219
 18,343
 18,082
 18,726
Commercial13,868
 13,606
 14,091
 14,102
 14,118
Industrial23,006
 22,687
 22,310
 23,380
 23,799
Other187
 198
 208
 201
 211
Total retail55,687
 53,710
 54,952
 55,765
 56,854
Wholesale — non-affiliates5,018
 5,415
 5,744
 3,567
 3,588
Wholesale — affiliates4,565
 4,166
 3,177
 4,515
 6,713
Total65,270
 63,291
 63,873
 63,847
 67,155
Average Revenue Per Kilowatt-Hour (cents):
         
Residential12.54
 13.37
 12.66
 12.21
 11.80
Commercial11.38
 12.12
 11.55
 11.09
 10.86
Industrial6.21
 6.51
 6.35
 6.14
 6.22
Total retail9.64
 10.16
 9.68
 9.39
 9.23
Wholesale4.15
 3.89
 3.95
 4.02
 4.56
Total sales8.83
 9.21
 8.88
 8.71
 8.52
Residential Average Annual
Kilowatt-Hour Use Per Customer
14,660
 13,601
 14,568
 14,454
 15,051
Residential Average Annual
Revenue Per Customer
$1,878
 $1,819
 $1,844
 $1,764
 $1,775
Plant Nameplate Capacity
Ratings (year-end) (megawatts)
11,815
 11,797
 11,797
 11,797
 12,222
Maximum Peak-Hour Demand (megawatts):
         
Winter11,744
 10,513
 10,282
 12,162
 11,761
Summer10,652
 10,711
 10,932
 11,292
 11,054
Annual Load Factor (percent)
60.1
 63.5
 63.5
 58.4
 61.4
Plant Availability (percent):
         
Fossil-steam81.6
 82.8
 83.0
 81.5
 82.5
Nuclear91.6
 97.6
 88.0
 92.1
 93.3
Source of Energy Supply (percent):
         
Coal43.8
 44.8
 47.1
 49.1
 49.0
Nuclear20.5
 22.2
 20.3
 21.3
 20.7
Gas17.2
 18.1
 17.1
 14.6
 15.4
Hydro6.7
 5.4
 4.8
 5.6
 5.5
Purchased power —         
From non-affiliates5.4
 4.6
 4.8
 4.4
 3.6
From affiliates6.4
 4.9
 5.9
 5.0
 5.8
Total100.0
 100.0
 100.0
 100.0
 100.0


SELECTED FINANCIAL AND OPERATING DATA 2014-2018
Georgia Power Company 2018 Annual Report
 2018
 2017
 2016
 2015
 2014
Operating Revenues (in millions)$8,420
 $8,310
 $8,383
 $8,326
 $8,988
Net Income After Dividends
on Preferred and Preference Stock (in millions)
(a)
$793
 $1,414
 $1,330
 $1,260
 $1,225
Cash Dividends on Common Stock (in millions)$1,396
 $1,281
 $1,305
 $1,034
 $954
Return on Average Common Equity (percent)6.04
 12.15
 12.05
 11.92
 12.24
Total Assets (in millions)(b)
$40,365
 $36,779
 $34,835
 $32,865
 $30,872
Gross Property Additions (in millions)$3,176
 $1,080
 $2,314
 $2,332
 $2,146
Capitalization (in millions):
        
Common stockholder's equity$14,323
 $11,931
 $11,356
 $10,719
 $10,421
Preferred and preference stock
 
 266
 266
 266
Long-term debt(b)
9,364
 11,073
 10,225
 9,616
 8,563
Total (excluding amounts due within one year)$23,687
 $23,004
 $21,847
 $20,601
 $19,250
Capitalization Ratios (percent):
        
Common stockholder's equity60.5
 51.9
 52.0
 52.0
 54.1
Preferred and preference stock
 
 1.2
 1.3
 1.4
Long-term debt(b)
39.5
 48.1
 46.8
 46.7
 44.5
Total (excluding amounts due within one year)100.0
 100.0
 100.0
 100.0
 100.0
Customers (year-end):         
Residential2,220,240
 2,185,782
 2,155,945
 2,127,658
 2,102,673
Commercial(c)
312,474
 308,939
 305,488
 302,891
 300,186
Industrial(c)
10,571
 10,644
 10,537
 10,429
 10,192
Other9,838
 9,766
 9,585
 9,261
 9,003
Total2,553,123
 2,515,131
 2,481,555
 2,450,239
 2,422,054
Employees (year-end)6,967
 6,986
 7,527
 7,989
 7,909
(a)Georgia Power recorded a pre-tax estimated probable loss of $1.1 billion ($0.8 billion after tax) in the second quarter 2018 to reflect its revised estimate to complete construction and start-up of Plant Vogtle Units 3 and 4.
(b)A reclassification of debt issuance costs from Total Assets to Long-term debt of $124 million and a reclassification of deferred tax assets from Total Assets to Accumulated deferred income taxes of $34 million is reflected for 2014, in accordance with new accounting standards adopted in 2015 and applied retrospectively.
(c)A reclassification of customers from commercial to industrial is reflected for years 2014-2015 to be consistent with the rate structure approved by the Georgia PSC. The impact to operating revenues, kilowatt-hour sales, and average revenue per kilowatt-hour by class is not material.


SELECTED FINANCIAL AND OPERATING DATA 2014-2018 (continued)
Georgia Power Company 2018 Annual Report
 2018
 2017
 2016
 2015
 2014
Operating Revenues (in millions):         
Residential$3,301
 $3,236
 $3,318
 $3,240
 $3,350
Commercial3,023
 3,092
 3,077
 3,094
 3,271
Industrial1,344
 1,321
 1,291
 1,305
 1,525
Other84
 89
 86
 88
 94
Total retail7,752
 7,738
 7,772
 7,727
 8,240
Wholesale — non-affiliates163
 163
 175
 215
 335
Wholesale — affiliates24
 26
 42
 20
 42
Total revenues from sales of electricity7,939
 7,927
 7,989
 7,962
 8,617
Other revenues481
 383
 394
 364
 371
Total$8,420
 $8,310
 $8,383
 $8,326
 $8,988
Kilowatt-Hour Sales (in millions):         
Residential28,331
 26,144
 27,585
 26,649
 27,132
Commercial32,958
 32,155
 32,932
 32,719
 32,426
Industrial23,655
 23,518
 23,746
 23,805
 23,549
Other549
 584
 610
 632
 633
Total retail85,493
 82,401
 84,873
 83,805
 83,740
Wholesale — non-affiliates3,140
 3,277
 3,415
 3,501
 4,323
Wholesale — affiliates526
 800
 1,398
 552
 1,117
Total89,159
 86,478
 89,686
 87,858
 89,180
Average Revenue Per Kilowatt-Hour (cents):         
Residential11.65
 12.38
 12.03
 12.16
 12.35
Commercial9.17
 9.62
 9.34
 9.46
 10.09
Industrial5.68
 5.62
 5.44
 5.48
 6.48
Total retail9.07
 9.39
 9.16
 9.22
 9.84
Wholesale5.10
 4.64
 4.51
 5.80
 6.93
Total sales8.90
 9.17
 8.91
 9.06
 9.66
Residential Average Annual
Kilowatt-Hour Use Per Customer
12,849
 12,028
 12,864
 12,582
 12,969
Residential Average Annual
Revenue Per Customer
$1,555
 $1,489
 $1,557
 $1,529
 $1,605
Plant Nameplate Capacity
Ratings (year-end) (megawatts)
15,308
 15,274
 15,274
 15,455
 17,593
Maximum Peak-Hour Demand (megawatts):         
Winter15,372
 13,894
 14,527
 15,735
 16,308
Summer15,748
 16,002
 16,244
 16,104
 15,777
Annual Load Factor (percent)64.5
 61.1
 61.9
 61.9
 61.2
Plant Availability (percent):         
Fossil-steam81.5
 85.0
 87.4
 85.6
 86.3
Nuclear95.0
 93.5
 95.6
 94.1
 90.8
Source of Energy Supply (percent):         
Gas29.1
 28.6
 28.2
 28.3
 26.3
Coal21.1
 22.4
 26.4
 24.5
 30.9
Nuclear17.6
 17.8
 17.6
 17.6
 16.7
Hydro1.9
 1.0
 1.1
 1.6
 1.3
Other0.3
 0.3
 
 
 
Purchased power —         
From non-affiliates7.3
 7.8
 6.7
 5.0
 3.8
From affiliates22.7
 22.1
 20.0
 23.0
 21.0
Total100.0
 100.0
 100.0
 100.0
 100.0


SELECTED FINANCIAL AND OPERATING DATA 2014-2018
Mississippi Power Company 2018 Annual Report
 2018
 2017
 2016
 2015
 2014
Operating Revenues (in millions)$1,265
 $1,187
 $1,163
 $1,138
 $1,243
Net Income (Loss) After Dividends
on Preferred Stock (in millions)
(a)(b)
$235
 $(2,590) $(50) $(8) $(329)
Return on Average Common Equity (percent)(a)(b)
15.83
 (120.43) (1.87) (0.34) (15.43)
Total Assets (in millions)(c)
$4,886
 $4,866
 $8,235
 $7,840
 $6,642
Gross Property Additions (in millions)$206
 $536
 $946
 $972
 $1,389
Capitalization (in millions):         
Common stockholder's equity$1,609
 $1,358
 $2,943
 $2,359
 $2,084
Redeemable preferred stock
 33
 33
 33
 33
Long-term debt(c)
1,539
 1,097
 2,424
 1,886
 1,621
Total (excluding amounts due within one year)$3,148
 $2,488
 $5,400
 $4,278
 $3,738
Capitalization Ratios (percent):         
Common stockholder's equity51.1
 54.6
 54.5
 55.1
 55.8
Redeemable preferred stock
 1.3
 0.6
 0.8
 0.9
Long-term debt(c)
48.9
 44.1
 44.9
 44.1
 43.3
Total (excluding amounts due within one year)100.0
 100.0
 100.0
 100.0
 100.0
Customers (year-end):         
Residential153,423
 153,115
 153,172
 153,158
 152,453
Commercial33,968
 33,992
 33,783
 33,663
 33,496
Industrial445
 452
 451
 467
 482
Other188
 173
 175
 175
 175
Total188,024
 187,732
 187,581
 187,463
 186,606
Employees (year-end)1,053
 1,242
 1,484
 1,478
 1,478
(a)As a result of the Tax Reform Legislation, Mississippi Power recorded an income tax expense (benefit) of $(35) million and $372 million in 2018 and 2017, respectively.
(b)A significant loss to income was recorded by Mississippi Power related to the suspension of the Kemper IGCC in June 2017. Earnings in all periods presented were impacted by losses related to the Kemper IGCC.
(c)A reclassification of debt issuance costs from Total Assets to Long-term debt of $9 million and a reclassification of deferred tax assets from Total Assets to Accumulated deferred income taxes of $105 million is reflected for 2014, in accordance with new accounting standards adopted in 2015 and applied retrospectively.


SELECTED FINANCIAL AND OPERATING DATA 2014-2018 (continued)
Mississippi Power Company 2018 Annual Report
 2018
 2017
 2016
 2015
 2014
Operating Revenues (in millions):         
Residential$273
 $257
 $260
 $238
 $239
Commercial286
 285
 279
 256
 257
Industrial321
 321
 313
 287
 291
Other9
 (9) 7
 (5) 8
Total retail889
 854
 859
 776
 795
Wholesale — non-affiliates263
 259
 261
 270
 323
Wholesale — affiliates91
 56
 26
 76
 107
Total revenues from sales of electricity1,243
 1,169
 1,146
 1,122
 1,225
Other revenues22
 18
 17
 16
 18
Total$1,265
 $1,187
 $1,163
 $1,138
 $1,243
Kilowatt-Hour Sales (in millions):         
Residential2,113
 1,944
 2,051
 2,025
 2,126
Commercial2,797
 2,764
 2,842
 2,806
 2,860
Industrial4,924
 4,841
 4,906
 4,958
 4,943
Other37
 39
 39
 40
 40
Total retail9,871
 9,588
 9,838
 9,829
 9,969
Wholesale — non-affiliates3,980
 3,672
 3,920
 3,852
 4,191
Wholesale — affiliates2,584
 2,024
 1,108
 2,807
 2,900
Total16,435
 15,284
 14,866
 16,488
 17,060
Average Revenue Per Kilowatt-Hour (cents):         
Residential12.92
 13.22
 12.68
 11.75
 11.26
Commercial10.23
 10.31
 9.82
 9.12
 8.99
Industrial6.52
 6.63
 6.38
 5.79
 5.89
Total retail9.01
 8.91
 8.73
 7.90
 7.97
Wholesale5.39
 5.53
 5.71
 5.20
 6.06
Total sales7.56
 7.65
 7.71
 6.80
 7.18
Residential Average Annual
Kilowatt-Hour Use Per Customer
13,768
 12,692
 13,383
 13,242
 13,934
Residential Average Annual
Revenue Per Customer
$1,780
 $1,680
 $1,697
 $1,556
 $1,568
Plant Nameplate Capacity
Ratings (year-end) (megawatts)
3,516
 3,628
 3,481
 3,561
 3,867
Maximum Peak-Hour Demand (megawatts):         
Winter2,763
 2,390
 2,195
 2,548
 2,618
Summer2,346
 2,322
 2,384
 2,403
 2,345
Annual Load Factor (percent)55.8
 63.1
 64.0
 60.6
 59.4
Plant Availability Fossil-Steam (percent)82.4
 89.1
 91.4
 90.6
 87.6
Source of Energy Supply (percent):         
Gas86.1
 88.0
 84.9
 81.6
 55.3
Coal6.9
 7.5
 8.0
 16.5
 39.7
Purchased power —         
From non-affiliates4.7
 0.5
 (0.3) 0.4
 1.4
From affiliates2.3
 4.0
 7.4
 1.5
 3.6
Total100.0
 100.0
 100.0
 100.0
 100.0


SELECTED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL AND OPERATING DATA 2014-2018
Southern Power Company and Subsidiary Companies 2018 Annual Report
 2018
 2017
 2016
 2015
 2014
Operating Revenues (in millions):         
Wholesale — non-affiliates$1,757
 $1,671
 $1,146
 $964
 $1,116
Wholesale — affiliates435
 392
 419
 417
 383
Total revenues from sales of electricity2,192
 2,063
 1,565
 1,381
 1,499
Other revenues13
 12
 12
 9
 2
Total$2,205
 $2,075
 $1,577
 $1,390
 $1,501
Net Income Attributable to
   Southern Power (in millions)(a)
$187
 $1,071
 $338
 $215
 $172
Cash Dividends
   on Common Stock (in millions)
$312
 $317
 $272
 $131
 $131
Return on Average Common Equity (percent)(a)
4.62
 22.39
 9.79
 10.16
 10.39
Total Assets (in millions)(b)
$14,883
 $15,206
 $15,169
 $8,905
 $5,233
Property, Plant, and Equipment
   In Service (in millions)
$13,271
 $13,755
 $12,728
 $7,275
 $5,657
Capitalization (in millions):         
Common stockholders' equity$2,968
 $5,138
 $4,430
 $2,483
 $1,752
Noncontrolling interests4,316
 1,360
 1,245
 781
 219
Redeemable noncontrolling interests
 
 164
 43
 39
Long-term debt(b)
4,418
 5,071
 5,068
 2,719
 1,085
Total (excluding amounts due within one year)$11,702
 $11,569
 $10,907
 $6,026
 $3,095
Capitalization Ratios (percent):         
Common stockholders' equity25.4
 44.4
 40.6
 41.2
 56.6
Noncontrolling interests36.9
 11.8
 11.4
 13.0
 7.1
Redeemable noncontrolling interests
 
 1.5
 0.7
 1.3
Long-term debt(b)
37.7
 43.8
 46.5
 45.1
 35.0
Total (excluding amounts due within one year)100.0
 100.0
 100.0
 100.0
 100.0
Kilowatt-Hour Sales (in millions):         
Wholesale — non-affiliates37,164
 35,920
 23,213
 18,544
 19,014
Wholesale — affiliates12,603
 12,811
 15,950
 16,567
 11,194
Total49,767
 48,731
 39,163
 35,111
 30,208
Plant Nameplate Capacity
   Ratings (year-end) (megawatts)
11,888
 12,940
 12,442
 9,808
 9,185
Maximum Peak-Hour Demand (megawatts):         
Winter2,867
 3,421
 3,469
 3,923
 3,999
Summer4,210
 4,224
 4,303
 4,249
 3,998
Annual Load Factor (percent)52.2
 49.1
 50.0
 49.0
 51.8
Plant Availability (percent)99.9
 99.9
 91.6
 93.1
 91.8
Source of Energy Supply (percent):         
Natural gas68.1
 67.7
 79.4
 89.5
 86.0
Solar, Wind, and Biomass23.6
 22.8
 12.1
 4.3
 2.9
Purchased power —         
From non-affiliates6.6
 7.8
 6.8
 4.7
 6.4
From affiliates1.7
 1.7
 1.7
 1.5
 4.7
Total100.0
 100.0
 100.0
 100.0
 100.0
Employees (year-end)(c)
491
 541
 
 
 
(a)As a result of the Tax Reform Legislation, Southern Power recorded an income tax expense (benefit) of $79 million and $(743) million in 2018 and 2017, respectively.
(b)A reclassification of debt issuance costs from Total Assets to Long-term debt of $11 million and a reclassification of deferred tax assets from Total Assets to Accumulated deferred income taxes of $306 million is reflected for 2014, in accordance with new accounting standards adopted in 2015 and applied retrospectively.
(c)Prior to December 2017, Southern Power had no employees but was billed for employee-related costs from SCS.

SELECTED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL AND OPERATING DATA 2014-2018
Southern Company Gas and Subsidiary Companies 2018 Annual Report
 
Successor(a)
  
Predecessor(a)
 
2018(b)
 2017 July 1, 2016 through December 31, 2016  January 1, 2016 through June 30, 2016 2015 2014
Operating Revenues (in millions)$3,909
 $3,920
 $1,652
  $1,905
 $3,941
 $5,385
Net Income Attributable to
Southern Company Gas
(in millions)
(c)
$372
 $243
 $114
  $131
 $353
 $482
Cash Dividends on Common Stock
(in millions)
$468
 $443
 $126
  $128
 $244
 $233
Return on Average Common Equity
(percent)
(c)
4.23
 2.68
 1.74
  3.31
 9.05
 12.96
Total Assets (in millions)$21,448
 $22,987
 $21,853
  $14,488
 $14,754
 $14,888
Gross Property Additions
(in millions)
$1,399
 $1,525
 $632
  $548
 $1,027
 $769
Capitalization (in millions):            
Common stockholders' equity$8,570
 $9,022
 $9,109
  $3,933
 $3,975
 $3,828
Long-term debt5,583
 5,891
 5,259
  3,709
 3,275
 3,581
Total (excluding amounts due within
one year)
$14,153
 $14,913
 $14,368
  $7,642
 $7,250
 $7,409
Capitalization Ratios (percent):            
Common stockholders' equity60.6
 60.5
 63.4
  51.5
 54.8
 51.7
Long-term debt39.4
 39.5
 36.6
  48.5
 45.2
 48.3
Total (excluding amounts due within
one year)
100.0
 100.0
 100.0
  100.0
 100.0
 100.0
Service Contracts (period-end)
 1,184,257
 1,198,263
  1,197,096
 1,205,476
 1,162,065
Customers (period-end)            
Gas distribution operations4,247,804
 4,623,249
 4,586,477
  4,544,489
 4,557,729
 4,529,114
Gas marketing services697,384
 773,984
 655,999
  630,475
 654,475
 633,460
Total4,945,188
 5,397,233
 5,242,476
  5,174,964
 5,212,204
 5,162,574
Employees (period-end)4,389
 5,318
 5,292
  5,284
 5,203
 5,165
(a)As a result of the Merger, pushdown accounting was applied to create a new cost basis for Southern Company Gas' assets, liabilities, and equity as of the acquisition date. Accordingly, the successor financial statements reflect the new basis of accounting, and successor and predecessor period financial results are presented but are not comparable.
(b)During 2018, Southern Company Gas completed the Southern Company Gas Dispositions. See Note 15 to the financial statements under "Southern Company Gas" in Item 8 herein for additional information.
(c)
As a result of the Tax Reform Legislation, Southern Company Gas recorded income tax expense (benefit) of $(3) million and $93 million in 2018 and 2017, respectively.


SELECTED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL AND OPERATING DATA 2014-2018 (continued)
Southern Company Gas and Subsidiary Companies 2018 Annual Report
 
Successor(a)
  
Predecessor(a)
 
2018(b)
 2017 July 1, 2016 through December 31, 2016  January 1, 2016 through June 30, 2016 2015 2014
Operating Revenues (in millions)            
Residential$1,886
 $2,100
 $899
  $1,101
 $2,129
 $2,877
Commercial546
 641
 260
  310
 617
 861
Transportation944
 811
 269
  290
 526
 458
Industrial140
 159
 74
  72
 203
 242
Other393
 209
 150
  132
 466
 947
Total$3,909
 $3,920
 $1,652
  $1,905
 $3,941
 $5,385
Heating Degree Days:            
Illinois6,101
 5,246
 1,903
  3,340
 5,433
 6,556
Georgia2,588
 1,970
 727
  1,448
 2,204
 2,882
Gas Sales Volumes
(mmBtu in millions):
            
Gas distribution operations            
Firm721
 667
 274
  396
 695
 766
Interruptible95
 95
 47
  49
 99
 106
Total816
 762
 321
  445
 794
 872
Gas marketing services            
Firm:            
Georgia37
 32
 13
  21
 35
 41
Illinois13
 12
 4
  8
 13
 17
Other20
 18
 5
  7
 11
 10
Interruptible large commercial and
industrial
14
 14
 6
  8
 14
 17
Total84
 76
 28
  44
 73
 85
Market share in Georgia (percent)29.0
 29.2
 29.4
  29.3
 29.7
 30.6
Wholesale gas services            
Daily physical sales (mmBtu in
millions/day
)
6.7
 6.4
 7.2
  7.6
 6.8
 6.3
(a)As a result of the Merger, pushdown accounting was applied to create a new cost basis for Southern Company Gas' assets, liabilities, and equity as of the acquisition date. Accordingly, the successor financial statements reflect the new basis of accounting, and successor and predecessor period financial results are presented but are not comparable.
(b)During 2018, Southern Company Gas completed the Southern Company Gas Dispositions. See Note 15 to the financial statements under "Southern Company Gas" in Item 8 herein for additional information.


Item 7.MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
Southern Company and Subsidiary Companies 2018 Annual Report



OVERVIEW
Business Activities
Southern Company is a holding company that owns all of the common stock of the traditional electric operating companies and the parent entities of Southern Power and Southern Company Gas and owns other direct and indirect subsidiaries. The primary businesses of the Southern Company system are electricity sales by the traditional electric operating companies and Southern Power and the distribution of natural gas by Southern Company Gas.
The traditional electric operating companies are vertically integrated utilities providing electric service in three Southeastern states as of January 1, 2019. On January 1, 2019, Southern Company completed its sale of Gulf Power to NextEra Energy for an increasedaggregate cash purchase price of approximately $5.8 billion (less $1.3 billion of indebtedness assumed), subject to customary working capital adjustments. At December 31, 2018, the assets and liabilities of Gulf Power were classified as held for sale on Southern Company's balance sheet. Unless otherwise noted, the disclosures herein related to specific asset and liability balances at December 31, 2018 exclude assets and liabilities held for sale. See Note 15 under "Assets Held for Sale" for additional information. A preliminary gain of $2.5 billion pre-tax ($1.3 billion after tax) associated with the sale of Gulf Power is expected to be recorded in 2019.
Southern Power develops, constructs, acquires, owns, and manages power generation assets, including renewable energy projects, and sells electricity at market-based rates in the wholesale market. On May 22, 2018, Southern Power sold a noncontrolling 33% equity ratiointerest in SP Solar, a limited partnership indirectly owning substantially all of 55%.Southern Power's solar facilities, for approximately $1.2 billion and, on December 11, 2018, Southern Power sold a noncontrolling tax equity interest in SP Wind, a holding company owning a portfolio of eight operating wind facilities, for approximately $1.2 billion. On November 5, 2018, Southern Power entered into an agreement to sell all of its equity interests in Plant Mankato (including the 385-MW expansion currently under construction) for an aggregate purchase price of approximately $650 million, which is expected to close mid-2019. The ultimate outcome of this matter cannot be determined at this time.
Southern Company Gas
The distributes natural gas through its natural gas distribution utilities are subjectand is involved in several other complementary businesses including gas pipeline investments, wholesale gas services, and gas marketing services. In July 2018, Southern Company Gas completed sales of three of its natural gas distribution utilities.
See FUTURE EARNINGS POTENTIAL – "General" herein and Note 15 to regulationthe financial statements for additional information regarding disposition activities.
Many factors affect the opportunities, challenges, and oversight by their respective staterisks of the Southern Company system's electricity and natural gas businesses. These factors include the ability to maintain constructive regulatory agencies for the rates chargedenvironments, to theirmaintain and grow sales and customers, and other matters.to effectively manage and secure timely recovery of costs. These agencies approve rates designedcosts include those related to provideprojected long-term demand growth, stringent environmental standards, including CCR rules, reliability, fuel, restoration following major storms, and capital expenditures, including constructing new electric generating plants, expanding and improving the opportunity to generate revenues to recover all prudently-incurred costs, including a return on rate base sufficient to pay interest on debtelectric transmission and provide a reasonable ROE.
The natural gas market for Atlanta Gas Light was deregulated in 1997. Accordingly, marketers, rather than a traditional utility, sell natural gas to end-use customers in Georgiadistribution systems, and handle customer billing functions. Atlanta Gas Light earns revenue for its distribution services by charging rates to its customers based primarily on monthly fixed charges that are set by the Georgia PSCupdating and adjusted periodically.
With the exception of Atlanta Gas Light,expanding the natural gas distribution utilities are authorized by the relevant regulatory agencies in the states in which they serve to use natural gas cost recovery mechanisms that adjust rates to reflect changes in the wholesale cost of natural gassystems.
The traditional electric operating companies and ensure recovery of all costs prudently incurred in purchasing natural gas for customers. Natural gas cost recovery revenues are adjusted for differences in actual recoverable natural gas costs and amounts billed in current regulated rates. Changes in the billing factor will not have a significant effect on revenues or net income, but will affect cash flows. In addition to natural gas cost recovery mechanisms, there are other cost recovery mechanisms, such as regulatory riders, which vary by utility but allow recovery of certain costs, such as those related to infrastructure replacement programs, as well as environmental remediation and energy efficiency plans. See Note 1 under "Cost of Natural Gas" for additional information.
Regulatory Infrastructure Programs
Certain of Southern Company Gas' natural gas distribution utilities are involved in ongoinghave various regulatory mechanisms that operate to address cost recovery. Effectively operating pursuant to these regulatory mechanisms and appropriately balancing required costs and capital projects associatedexpenditures with infrastructure improvement programs that have been previously approved bycustomer prices will continue to challenge the Southern Company system for the foreseeable future. See Note 2 to the financial statements for additional information.
In 2018, Alabama Power, Georgia Power, Mississippi Power, Atlanta Gas Light, and Nicor Gas reached agreements with their respective state PSCs or other applicable state regulatory agencies and provide an appropriate return on invested capital. These infrastructure improvement programs are designed to update or expand the natural gas distribution systems of the natural gas distribution utilities to improve reliability and meet operational flexibility and growth. Initial program lengths range from nine to 10 years, with completion dates ranging from 2020 through 2025.
On February 21, 2017, the Georgia PSC approved a rate adjustment mechanism for Atlanta Gas Light that included the 2017 capital investment associated with a four-year extension of one of its existing infrastructure programs, with a total additional investment of $177 million through 2020.
Base Rate Cases
On January 31, 2018, the Illinois Commerce Commission approved a $137 million increase in Nicor Gas' annual base rate revenues, including $93 million relatedrelating to the recovery of investments under Nicor Gas' infrastructure program, effective February 8, 2018, based on a ROE of 9.8%.
The Illinois Commerce Commission issued an order effective January 25, 2018 that requires utilities in the state to record theregulatory impacts of the Tax Reform Legislation, which, for some companies, included capital structure adjustments expected to help mitigate the potential adverse impacts to certain of their credit metrics. See Note 2 to the financial statements for additional information regarding state PSC or other regulatory agency actions related to the Tax Reform Legislation. Also see MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS – FUTURE EARNINGS POTENTIAL – "Income Tax Matters" and FINANCIAL CONDITION AND LIQUIDITY – "Credit Rating Risk" herein and Note 10 to the financial statements for information regarding the Tax Reform Legislation.
Another major factor affecting the Southern Company system's businesses is the profitability of the competitive market-based wholesale generating business. Southern Power's strategy is to create value through various transactions including acquisitions, dispositions, and sales of partnership interests, development and construction of new generating facilities, and entry into PPAs primarily with investor-owned utilities, IPPs, municipalities, electric cooperatives, and other load-serving entities, as well as commercial and industrial customers. In general, Southern Power commits to the reductionconstruction or acquisition of new generating capacity only after entering into or assuming long-term PPAs for the new facilities.

MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS (continued)
Southern Company and Subsidiary Companies 2018 Annual Report


Southern Company's other business activities include providing energy solutions, including distributed energy infrastructure, energy efficiency products and services, and utility infrastructure services, to customers. Other business activities also include investments in telecommunications, leveraged lease projects, and gas storage facilities. Management continues to evaluate the contribution of each of these activities to total shareholder return and may pursue acquisitions, dispositions, and other strategic ventures or investments accordingly.
In striving to achieve attractive risk-adjusted returns while providing cost-effective energy to more than eight million electric and gas utility customers, the Southern Company system continues to focus on several key performance indicators. These indicators include, but are not limited to, customer satisfaction, plant availability, electric and natural gas system reliability, execution of major construction projects, and earnings per share (EPS). Southern Company's financial success is directly tied to customer satisfaction. Key elements of ensuring customer satisfaction include outstanding service, high reliability, and competitive prices. Management uses customer satisfaction surveys and reliability indicators to evaluate the results of the Southern Company system.
See RESULTS OF OPERATIONS herein for information on Southern Company's financial performance.
Plant Vogtle Units 3 and 4 Status
In 2009, the Georgia PSC certified construction of Plant Vogtle Units 3 and 4 (with electric generating capacity of approximately 1,100 MWs each). Georgia Power holds a 45.7% ownership interest in Plant Vogtle Units 3 and 4. In March 2017, the EPC Contractor filed for bankruptcy protection under Chapter 11 of the U.S. Bankruptcy Code. In December 2017, the Georgia PSC approved Georgia Power's recommendation to continue construction. The current expected in-service dates remain November 2021 for Unit 3 and November 2022 for Unit 4.
In the second quarter 2018, Georgia Power revised its base capital cost forecast and estimated contingency to complete construction and start-up of Plant Vogtle Units 3 and 4 to $8.0 billion and $0.4 billion, respectively, for a total project capital cost forecast of $8.4 billion (net of $1.7 billion received under the Guarantee Settlement Agreement and approximately $188 million in related Customer Refunds), with respect to Georgia Power's ownership interest. Although Georgia Power believes these incremental costs are reasonable and necessary to complete the project and the Georgia PSC's order in the corporate income taxseventeenth VCM proceeding specifically states that the construction of Plant Vogtle Units 3 and 4 is not subject to a cost cap, Georgia Power did not seek rate to 21% andrecovery for the impact of excess deferred income taxes, as a regulatory liability. On February 20, 2018,$0.7 billion increase in costs included in the Illinois Commerce Commission granted Nicor Gas' application for rehearing to file revisedcurrent base rates and tariffs, which Nicor Gas expects to filecapital cost forecast (or any related financing costs) in the nineteenth VCM report that was approved by the endGeorgia PSC on February 19, 2019. In connection with future VCM filings, Georgia Power may request the Georgia PSC to evaluate costs currently included in the construction contingency estimate for rate recovery as and when they are appropriately included in the base capital cost forecast. After considering the significant level of uncertainty that exists regarding the future recoverability of costs included in the construction contingency estimate since the ultimate outcome of these matters is subject to the outcome of future assessments by management, as well as Georgia PSC decisions in these future regulatory proceedings, Georgia Power recorded a total pre-tax charge to income of $1.1 billion ($0.8 billion after tax) in the second quarter 2018.
On December 1, 2017, Atlanta Gas Light filed its 2018 annual rate adjustment with the Georgia PSC. If approved, Atlanta Gas Light's annual base rate revenues will increase by $22 million, effective June 1, 2018. Atlanta Gas Light will fileAs a revised rate adjustment to incorporate the effectsresult of the Tax Reform Legislation in the first quarter 2018. The Georgia PSC is expected to rule on the revised requested increase in the second quarter 2018.total project capital cost forecast and Georgia Power's decision not to seek rate recovery of the increase in the base capital costs, the holders of at least 90% of the ownership interests in Plant Vogtle Units 3 and 4 were required to vote to continue construction. On September 26, 2018, the Vogtle Owners unanimously voted to continue construction of Plant Vogtle Units 3 and 4. In connection with the vote to continue construction, Georgia Power entered into (i) a binding term sheet (Vogtle Owner Term Sheet) with the other Vogtle Owners and certain of MEAG's wholly-owned subsidiaries, including MEAG Power SPVJ, LLC (MEAG SPVJ), to take certain actions which partially mitigate potential financial exposure for the other Vogtle Owners and (ii) a term sheet (MEAG Term Sheet) with MEAG and MEAG SPVJ to provide funding with respect to MEAG SPVJ's ownership interest in Plant Vogtle Units 3 and 4 under certain circumstances. On January 14, 2019, Georgia Power, MEAG, and MEAG SPVJ entered into an agreement to implement the provisions of the MEAG Term Sheet. On February 18, 2019, Georgia Power, the other Vogtle Owners, and certain of MEAG's wholly-owned subsidiaries entered into certain amendments to their joint ownership agreements to implement the provisions of the Vogtle Owner Term Sheet.
The ultimate outcome of these matters cannot be determined at this time.
See FUTURE EARNINGS POTENTIAL – "Construction ProgramNuclear Construction" herein for additional information on Plant Vogtle Units 3 and 4.
Kemper County Energy FacilityEarnings
Overview
Consolidated net income attributable to Southern Company was $2.2 billion in 2018, an increase of $1.4 billion, or 164.4%, from the prior year. The Kemper County energy facilityincrease was designedprimarily due to utilize IGCC technology with an expected output capacitycharges of 582 MWs and to be fueled by locally mined lignite (an abundant, lower heating value coal) from a mine owned by Mississippi Power and situated adjacent$3.4 billion ($2.4 billion after tax) in 2017 related to the Kemper County energy facility. The mine, operatedIGCC at Mississippi Power, partially offset by North American Coal Corporation, starteda $1.1 billion ($0.8 billion after tax) charge in the second quarter 2018 for an
    Table of Contents                                Index to Financial Statements

NOTESMANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS (continued)
Southern Company and Subsidiary Companies 20172018 Annual Report


estimated probable loss on Georgia Power's construction of Plant Vogtle Units 3 and 4. The increase also reflects lower federal income tax expense as a result of the Tax Reform Legislation, partially offset by impairment charges, primarily associated with asset sales at Southern Power and Southern Company Gas.
Consolidated net income attributable to Southern Company was $842 million in 2017, a decrease of $1.6 billion, or 65.6%, from the prior year. The decrease was primarily due to pre-tax charges of $3.4 billion ($2.4 billion after tax) related to the Kemper IGCC at Mississippi Power. Also contributing to the change were increases of $240 million in net income from Southern Company Gas (excluding the impact of $111 million in additional expense related to the Tax Reform Legislation) reflecting the 12-month period in 2017 compared to the six-month period following the Merger closing on July 1, 2016, $264 million related to net tax benefits from the Tax Reform Legislation, higher retail electric revenues resulting from increases in base rates partially offset by milder weather and lower customer usage, and increases in renewable energy sales at Southern Power. These increases were partially offset by higher interest and depreciation and amortization.
See Note 15 to the financial statements under "Southern Company Merger with Southern Company Gas" for additional information regarding the Merger.
Basic EPS was $2.18 in 2018, $0.84 in 2017, and $2.57 in 2016. Diluted EPS, which factors in additional shares related to stock-based compensation, was $2.17 in 2018, $0.84 in 2017, and $2.55 in 2016. EPS for 2018, 2017, and 2016 was negatively impacted by $0.04, $0.04, and $0.12 per share, respectively, as a result of increases in the average shares outstanding. See FINANCIAL CONDITION AND LIQUIDITY – "Financing Activities" herein for additional information.
Dividends
Southern Company has paid dividends on its common stock since 1948. Dividends paid per share of common stock were $2.38 in 2018, $2.30 in 2017, and $2.22 in 2016. In January 2019, Southern Company declared a quarterly dividend of 60 cents per share. This is the 285th consecutive quarter that Southern Company has paid a dividend equal to or higher than the previous quarter. For 2018, the dividend payout ratio was 109% compared to 273% for 2017. The decrease was due to an increase in earnings in 2018 resulting from charges related to the Kemper IGCC in 2017, partially offset by the charge related to construction of Plant Vogtle Units 3 and 4 in 2018. See "Earnings" and RESULTS OF OPERATIONS – "Electricity BusinessEstimated Loss on Projects Under Construction" herein and Note 2 to the financial statements under "Georgia PowerNuclear Construction" and "Mississippi PowerKemper County Energy Facility" for additional information.
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
Discussion of the results of operations is divided into three parts – the Southern Company system's primary business of electricity sales, its gas business, and its other business activities.
 2018 2017 2016
 (in millions)
Electricity business$2,304
 $878
 $2,571
Gas business372
 243
 114
Other business activities(450) (279) (237)
Net Income$2,226
 $842
 $2,448

MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS (continued)
Southern Company and Subsidiary Companies 2018 Annual Report


Electricity Business
Southern Company's electric utilities generate and sell electricity to retail and wholesale customers. The results of operations discussed below include the results of Gulf Power through December 31, 2018. See Note 15 to the financial statements under "Southern Company's Sale of Gulf Power" for additional information.
A condensed statement of income for the electricity business follows:
 Amount 
Increase (Decrease)
from Prior Year
 2018 2018 2017
 (in millions)
Electric operating revenues$18,571
 $31
 $599
Fuel4,637
 237
 39
Purchased power971

108
 113
Cost of other sales66
 (3) 11
Other operations and maintenance4,635
 45
 (76)
Depreciation and amortization2,565
 108
 224
Taxes other than income taxes1,098
 35
 24
Estimated loss on plants under construction1,097
 (2,265) 2,934
Impairment charges156
 156
 
Gain on dispositions, net
 40
 (41)
Total electric operating expenses15,225
 (1,539) 3,228
Operating income3,346
 1,570
 (2,629)
Allowance for equity funds used during construction131
 (21) (48)
Interest expense, net of amounts capitalized1,035
 24
 80
Other income (expense), net144
 17
 58
Income taxes207
 125
 (1,009)
Net income2,379
 1,417
 (1,690)
Less:     
Dividends on preferred and preference stock of subsidiaries16
 (22) (7)
Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests59
 13
 10
Net Income Attributable to Southern Company$2,304
 $1,426
 $(1,693)

MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS (continued)
Southern Company and Subsidiary Companies 2018 Annual Report


Electric Operating Revenues
Electric operating revenues for 2018 were $18.6 billion, reflecting a $31 million increase from 2017. Details of electric operating revenues were as follows:
 2018 2017
 (in millions)
Retail electric — prior year$15,330
 $15,234
Estimated change resulting from —   
Rates and pricing(773) 508
Sales growth (decline)84
 (71)
Weather300
 (281)
Fuel and other cost recovery281
 (60)
Retail electric — current year15,222
 15,330
Wholesale electric revenues2,516
 2,426
Other electric revenues664
 681
Other revenues169
 103
Electric operating revenues$18,571
 $18,540
Percent change0.2% 3.3%
Retail electric revenues decreased $108 million, or 0.7%, in 2018 as compared to the prior year. The significant factors driving this change are shown in the preceding table. The decrease in rates and pricing in 2018 was primarily due to revenues deferred as regulatory liabilities for customer bill credits related to the Tax Reform Legislation and expected customer refunds at Alabama Power and Georgia Power.
Retail electric revenues increased $96 million, or 0.6%, in 2017 as compared to the prior year. The significant factors driving this change are shown in the preceding table. The increase in rates and pricing in 2017 was primarily due to a Rate RSE increase at Alabama Power effective in January 2017, the recovery of Plant Vogtle Units 3 and 4 construction financing costs under the NCCR tariff at Georgia Power, and an increase in retail base rates effective July 2017 at Gulf Power.
See Note 2 to the financial statements under "Southern CompanyGulf Power," "Alabama PowerRate RSE" and " – Rate CNP Compliance," "Georgia PowerRate Plans," and " – Nuclear Construction" for additional information. Also see "Energy Sales" below for a discussion of changes in the volume of energy sold, including changes related to sales growth (decline) and weather.
Electric rates for the traditional electric operating companies include provisions to adjust billings for fluctuations in fuel costs, including the energy component of purchased power costs. Under these provisions, fuel revenues generally equal fuel expenses, including the energy component of PPA costs, and do not affect net income. The traditional electric operating companies each have one or more regulatory mechanisms to recover other costs such as environmental and other compliance costs, storm damage, new plants, and PPA capacity costs.
Wholesale electric revenues consist of PPAs and short-term opportunity sales. Wholesale electric revenues from PPAs (other than solar and wind PPAs) have both capacity and energy components. Capacity revenues generally represent the greatest contribution to net income and are designed to provide recovery of fixed costs plus a return on investment. Energy revenues will vary depending on fuel prices, the market prices of wholesale energy compared to the Southern Company system's generation, demand for energy within the Southern Company system's electric service territory, and the availability of the Southern Company system's generation. Increases and decreases in energy revenues that are driven by fuel prices are accompanied by an increase or decrease in fuel costs and do not have a significant impact on net income. Energy sales from solar and wind PPAs do not have a capacity charge and customers either purchase the energy output of a dedicated renewable facility through an energy charge or through a fixed price related to the energy. As a result, the ability to recover fixed and variable operations and maintenance expenses is dependent upon the level of energy generated from these facilities, which can be impacted by weather conditions, equipment performance, transmission constraints, and other factors. Wholesale electric revenues at Mississippi Power include FERC-regulated MRA sales as well as market-based sales. Short-term opportunity sales are made at market-based rates that generally provide a margin above the Southern Company system's variable cost to produce the energy.

MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS (continued)
Southern Company and Subsidiary Companies 2018 Annual Report


Wholesale electric revenues from power sales were as follows:
 2018 2017 2016
 (in millions)
Capacity and other$620
 $642
 $570
Energy1,896
 1,784
 1,356
Total$2,516
 $2,426
 $1,926
In 2018, wholesale revenues increased $90 million, or 3.7%, as compared to the prior year due to a $112 million increase in energy revenues, partially offset by a $22 million decrease in capacity revenues. The increase in energy revenues was primarily related to Southern Power and includes new PPAs related to existing natural gas facilities, new renewable facilities, and an increase in the volume of KWHs sold at existing renewable facilities, partially offset by a decrease in non-PPA revenues from short-term sales. The decrease in capacity revenues was primarily due to the expiration of a wholesale contract in the fourth quarter 2017 at Georgia Power.
In 2017, wholesale revenues increased $500 million, or 26.0%, as compared to the prior year due to a $428 million increase in energy revenues and a $72 million increase in capacity revenues, primarily at Southern Power. The increase in energy revenues was primarily due to increases in renewable energy sales arising from new solar and wind facilities and non-PPA revenues from short-term sales. The increase in capacity revenues was primarily due to a PPA related to new natural gas facilities and additional customer capacity requirements.
Other Electric Revenues
Other electric revenues decreased $17 million, or 2.5%, in 2018 as compared to the prior year. The decrease is primarily related to a decrease in open access transmission tariff revenues, largely due to a lower rate related to the Tax Reform Legislation. Other electric revenues decreased $17 million, or 2.4%, in 2017, as compared to the prior year. The decrease reflects a $15 million decrease in open access transmission tariff revenues, primarily as a result of the expiration of long-term transmission services contracts at Georgia Power.
Energy Sales
Changes in revenues are influenced heavily by the change in the volume of energy sold from year to year. KWH sales for 2018 and the percent change from the prior year were as follows:
 
Total
KWHs
 
Total KWH
Percent Change
 
Weather-Adjusted
Percent Change
 2018 2018 2017 2018 2017
 (in billions)        
Residential54.6
 8.0 % (5.3)% 1.2 % (0.3)%
Commercial53.5
 2.1
 (2.6) 0.5
 (0.9)
Industrial53.3
 1.1
 
 1.1
 
Other0.8
 (5.5) (4.0) (5.7) (3.9)
Total retail162.2
 3.6
 (2.6) 0.9 % (0.4)%
Wholesale49.9
 1.9
 32.4
    
Total energy sales212.1
 3.2 % 3.9 %    
Changes in retail energy sales are generally the result of changes in electricity usage by customers, changes in weather, and changes in the number of customers. Retail energy sales increased 5.7 billion KWHs in 2018 as compared to the prior year. This increase was primarily due to colder weather in the first quarter 2018 and warmer weather in the second and third quarters 2018 compared to the corresponding periods in 2017. Weather-adjusted residential KWH sales increased primarily due to customer growth. Weather-adjusted commercial operationKWH sales increased primarily due to customer growth, partially offset by decreased customer usage resulting from customer initiatives in 2013. energy savings and an ongoing migration to the electronic commerce business model. Industrial KWH energy sales increased primarily due to increased sales in the primary metals sector, partially offset by decreased sales in the paper sector.
Retail energy sales decreased 4.2 billion KWHs in 2017 as compared to the prior year. This decrease was primarily due to milder weather and decreased customer usage, partially offset by customer growth. Weather-adjusted residential KWH sales decreased

MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS (continued)
Southern Company and Subsidiary Companies 2018 Annual Report


primarily due to decreased customer usage resulting from an increase in penetration of energy-efficient residential appliances and an increase in multi-family housing, partially offset by customer growth. Weather-adjusted commercial KWH sales decreased primarily due to decreased customer usage resulting from customer initiatives in energy savings and an ongoing migration to the electronic commerce business model, partially offset by customer growth. Industrial KWH energy sales were flat primarily due to decreased sales in the paper, stone, clay, and glass, transportation, and chemicals sectors, offset by increased sales in the primary metals and textile sectors. Additionally, Hurricane Irma negatively impacted customer usage for all customer classes.
See "Electric Operating Revenues" above for a discussion of significant changes in wholesale revenues related to changes in price and KWH sales.
Other Revenues
Other revenues increased $66 million, or 64.1%, in 2018 as compared to the prior year. The increase was primarily due to unregulated sales of products and services that were reclassified from other income (expense), net as a result of the adoption of ASC 606, Revenue from Contracts with Customers (ASC 606). See Note 1 to the financial statements for additional information regarding the adoption of ASC 606.
Other revenues increased $20 million in 2017 as compared to the prior year. The increase was primarily due to additional third party infrastructure services.
Fuel and Purchased Power Expenses
The mix of fuel sources for the generation of electricity is determined primarily by demand, the unit cost of fuel consumed, and the availability of generating units. Additionally, the electric utilities purchase a portion of their electricity needs from the wholesale market.
Details of the Southern Company system's generation and purchased power were as follows:
 2018 2017 2016
Total generation (in billions of KWHs)
200
 194
 188
Total purchased power (in billions of KWHs)
21
 20
 19
Sources of generation (percent) —
     
Gas46
 46
 46
Coal30
 30
 33
Nuclear15
 16
 16
Hydro3
 2
 2
Other6
 6
 3
Cost of fuel, generated (in cents per net KWH)(a) 
     
Gas2.89
 2.79
 2.48
Coal2.80
 2.81
 3.04
Nuclear0.80
 0.79
 0.81
Average cost of fuel, generated (in cents per net KWH)(a)
2.50
 2.44
 2.40
Average cost of purchased power (in cents per net KWH)(b)
5.46
 5.19
 4.81
(a)For 2018, cost of fuel, generated and average cost of fuel, generated excludes a $30 million adjustment associated with a May 2018 Alabama PSC accounting order related to excess deferred income taxes.
(b)Average cost of purchased power includes fuel purchased by the Southern Company system for tolling agreements where power is generated by the provider.
In connection2018, total fuel and purchased power expenses were $5.6 billion, an increase of $345 million, or 6.6%, as compared to the prior year. The increase was primarily the result of a $178 million increase in the volume of KWHs generated and purchased primarily due to colder weather in the first quarter 2018 and warmer weather in the second and third quarters 2018 compared to the corresponding periods in 2017 and a $137 million increase in the average cost of fuel and purchased power primarily due to higher natural gas prices.
In addition, fuel expense increased $30 million in 2018 as a result of an Alabama PSC accounting order authorizing the amortization of a regulatory liability to offset under recovered fuel costs. See FUTURE EARNINGS POTENTIAL – "Regulatory Matters – Alabama Power – Tax Reform Accounting Order" herein for additional information.

MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS (continued)
Southern Company and Subsidiary Companies 2018 Annual Report


In 2017, total fuel and purchased power expenses were $5.3 billion, an increase of $152 million, or 3.0%, as compared to the prior year. The increase was primarily the result of a $196 million increase in the average cost of fuel and purchased power primarily due to higher natural gas prices, partially offset by a $44 million net decrease in the volume of KWHs generated and purchased.
Fuel and purchased power energy transactions at the traditional electric operating companies are generally offset by fuel revenues and do not have a significant impact on net income. See FUTURE EARNINGS POTENTIAL – "Regulatory MattersFuel Cost Recovery" herein for additional information. Fuel expenses incurred under Southern Power's PPAs are generally the responsibility of the counterparties and do not significantly impact net income.
Fuel
In 2018, fuel expense was $4.6 billion, an increase of $237 million, or 5.4%, as compared to the prior year. The increase was primarily due to a 3.6% increase in the average cost of natural gas per KWH generated, a 3.5% increase in the volume of KWHs generated by coal, and a 2.8% increase in the volume of KWHs generated by natural gas.
In 2017, fuel expense was $4.4 billion, an increase of $39 million, or 0.9%, as compared to the prior year. The increase was primarily due to a 12.5% increase in the average cost of natural gas per KWH generated and a 2.8% increase in the volume of KWHs generated by natural gas, partially offset by a 7.9% decrease in the volume of KWHs generated by coal and a 7.6% decrease in the average cost of coal per KWH generated.
Purchased Power
In 2018, purchased power expense was $971 million, an increase of $108 million, or 12.5%, as compared to the prior year. The increase was primarily due to a 5.2% increase in the average cost per KWH purchased, primarily as a result of higher natural gas prices, and a 5.2% increase in the volume of KWHs purchased.
In 2017, purchased power expense was $863 million, an increase of $113 million, or 15.1%, as compared to the prior year. The increase was primarily due to a 7.9% increase in the average cost per KWH purchased, primarily as a result of higher natural gas prices, and a 5.0% increase in the volume of KWHs purchased.
Energy purchases will vary depending on demand for energy within the Southern Company system's electric service territory, the market prices of wholesale energy as compared to the cost of the Southern Company system's generation, and the availability of the Southern Company system's generation.
Other Operations and Maintenance Expenses
Other operations and maintenance expenses increased $45 million, or 1.0%, in 2018 as compared to the prior year. The increase was primarily due to a $74 million increase in transmission and distribution costs, primarily related to additional vegetation management at Georgia Power, and $74 million in expenses from unregulated sales of products and services that were reclassified to other operations and maintenance expenses as a result of the adoption of ASC 606. In prior periods, these expenses were included in other income (expense), net. These increases were partially offset by a $32.5 million charge in the first quarter 2017 related to the write-down of Gulf Power's ownership of Plant Scherer Unit 3 in accordance with a rate case settlement agreement, a $30 million net decrease in employee compensation and benefits, including pension costs, largely due to a decrease in active medical costs at Alabama Power and a 2017 employee attrition plan at Georgia Power, and a $27 million decrease in customer accounts, service, and sales costs primarily due to cost-saving initiatives. See Note 1 to the financial statements for additional information regarding the adoption of ASC 606.
Other operations and maintenance expenses decreased $76 million, or 1.6%, in 2017 as compared to the prior year. The decrease was primarily due to cost containment and modernization activities implemented at Georgia Power that contributed to decreases of $85 million in generation maintenance costs, $46 million in transmission and distribution overhead line maintenance, $22 million in other employee compensation and benefits, and $22 million in customer accounts, service, and sales costs. Additionally, there was a $34 million decrease in scheduled outage and maintenance costs at generation facilities. These decreases were partially offset by a $56 million increase associated with new facilities at Southern Power, a $37 million increase in transmission and distribution costs primarily due to vegetation management at Alabama Power, and $32.5 million resulting from the write-down of Gulf Power's ownership of Plant Scherer Unit 3 in accordance with a rate case settlement agreement.
Production expenses and transmission and distribution expenses fluctuate from year to year due to variations in outage and maintenance schedules and normal changes in the cost of labor and materials.

MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS (continued)
Southern Company and Subsidiary Companies 2018 Annual Report


Depreciation and Amortization
Depreciation and amortization increased $108 million, or 4.4%, in 2018 as compared to the prior year. The increase was primarily related to additional plant in service. Additionally, the increase reflects $34 million in depreciation credits recognized in 2017, as authorized in Gulf Power's 2013 rate case settlement.
Depreciation and amortization increased $224 million, or 10.0%, in 2017 as compared to the prior year. The increase reflects $203 million related to additional plant in service at the traditional electric operating companies and Southern Power and a $13 million increase in amortization related to environmental compliance at Mississippi Power. The increase was partially offset by $34 million in depreciation credits recognized in accordance with Gulf Power's 2013 rate case settlement.
See Note 2 to the financial statements under "Southern CompanyRegulatory Assets and Liabilities" and Note 5 to the financial statements under "Depreciation and Amortization" for additional information.
Taxes Other Than Income Taxes
Taxes other than income taxes increased $35 million, or 3.3%, in 2018 as compared to the prior year primarily due to increased property taxes associated with higher assessed values and an increase in municipal franchise fees primarily related to higher retail revenues at Georgia Power.
Taxes other than income taxes increased $24 million, or 2.3%, in 2017 as compared to the prior year primarily due to an increase in property taxes due to new facilities at Southern Power.
Estimated Loss on Projects Under Construction
In the second quarter 2018, an estimated probable loss of $1.1 billion was recorded to reflect Georgia Power's revised estimate to complete construction and start-up of Plant Vogtle Units 3 and 4, which reflects the increase in costs included in the revised base capital cost forecast for which Georgia Power did not seek rate recovery and costs included in the revised construction contingency estimate for which Georgia Power may seek rate recovery as and when such costs are appropriately included in the base capital cost forecast. See Note 2 to the financial statements under "Georgia PowerNuclear Construction" for additional information.
Charges associated with the Kemper County energy facility construction, Mississippi Power constructed approximately 61 milesIGCC of CO2 pipeline infrastructure$37 million, $3.4 billion, and $428 million were recorded in 2018, 2017, and 2016, respectively. The 2018 pre-tax charge of $37 million primarily resulted from the abandonment and related closure activities and ongoing period costs, net of sales proceeds, for the transport of captured CO2 for use in enhanced oil recovery.
Schedulemine and Cost Estimate
In 2012, the Mississippi PSC issued the 2012 MPSC CPCN Order, confirming the CPCN originally approved by the Mississippi PSC in 2010 authorizing the acquisition, construction, and operation ofgasifier-related assets at the Kemper County energy facility. The certificated cost estimateOn June 28, 2017, Mississippi Power suspended the gasifier portion of the project and recorded a charge to earnings for the remaining $2.8 billion book value of the gasifier portion of the project. Prior to the suspension, Mississippi Power recorded losses for revisions of estimated costs expected to be incurred on construction of the Kemper County energy facility includedIGCC in excess of the 2012 MPSC CPCN Order was $2.4$2.88 billion cost cap established by the Mississippi PSC, net of approximately $0.57 billion for$245 million of grants awarded to the project by the DOE under the Clean Coal Power Initiative Round 2 and excluding the cost of the lignite mine and equipment, the cost of the CO2 pipeline facilities, AFUDC, and certain general exceptions (Cost Cap Exceptions). The 2012 MPSC CPCN Order approved a construction cost cap of upexceptions. See Note 2 to $2.88 billion, with recovery of prudently-incurred costs subject to approval by the financial statements under "Mississippi PSC. The PowerKemper County energy facility was originally projectedEnergy Facility" for additional information.
Impairment Charges
In the second quarter 2018, Southern Power recorded a $119 million asset impairment charge in contemplation of the sale of Plant Oleander and Plant Stanton Unit A (together, the Florida Plants) and in the third quarter 2018 recorded a $36 million asset impairment charge on wind turbine equipment held for development projects. There were no asset impairment charges recorded in 2017 or 2016. See Note 15 to be placedthe financial statements under "Southern Power – Sales of Natural Gas Plants" and " – Development Projects" for additional information.
Gain on Dispositions, Net
Gain on dispositions, net decreased $40 million in service2018 and increased $41 million in May 2014.2017 as compared to the prior periods primarily due to gains on sales of assets at Georgia Power recorded in 2017.
Allowance for Equity Funds Used During Construction
AFUDC equity decreased $21 million, or 13.8%, in 2018 as compared to the prior year primarily due to Mississippi Power placed the combined cycle and the associated common facilities portionPower's suspension of the Kemper County energy facility in service in August 2014.
The initial production of syngas began on July 14, 2016 for gasifier "B" and on September 13, 2016 for gasifier "A." Mississippi Power achieved integrated operation of both gasifiers on January 29, 2017, including the production of electricity from syngas in both combustion turbines. During testing, the plant produced and captured CO2, and produced sulfuric acid and ammonia, each of acceptable quality under the related off-take agreements. However, Mississippi Power experienced numerous challenges during the extended start-up process to achieve integrated operation of the gasifiers on a sustained basis. In May 2017, after achieving these milestones, Mississippi Power determined that a critical system component, the syngas coolers, would need replacement sooner than originally planned, which would require significant lead time and significant cost. In addition, the long-term natural gas price forecast had decreased significantly and the estimated cost of operating and maintaining the facility during the first five full years of operations had increased significantly since certification.
On June 21, 2017, the Mississippi PSC stated its intent to issue an order (which occurred on July 6, 2017) directing Mississippi Power to pursue a settlement under which the Kemper County energy facility would be operated as a natural gas plant, rather than an IGCC plant, and address all issues associated with the Kemper County energy facility (Kemper Settlement Order). The Kemper Settlement Order established a new docket for the purposes of pursuing a global settlement of the related costs (Kemper Settlement Docket). On June 28, 2017, Mississippi Power notified the Mississippi PSC that it would begin a process to suspend operations and start-up activities on the gasifier portion of the Kemper County energy facility, given the uncertainty as to its future. On February 6, 2018, the Mississippi PSC voted to approve a settlement agreement related to cost recovery for the Kemper County energy facility among Mississippi Power, the MPUS, and certain intervenors (Kemper Settlement Agreement).
At the time of project suspensionconstruction in June 2017, the total cost estimate for the Kemper County energy facility was approximately $7.38 billion, including approximately $5.95 billion of costs subject to the construction cost cap,partially offset by a higher AFUDC rate resulting from a higher equity ratio and was net of the $137 million in additional grants from the DOE for the Kemper County energy facility. In the aggregate, Mississippilower short-term borrowings at Georgia Power had recorded charges to income of $3.07 billion ($1.89 billion after tax) asand a result of changes in the cost estimate above the cost cap for the Kemper IGCC through May 31, 2017.
Given the Mississippi PSC's stated intent regarding no further rate increase for the Kemper County energy facility and the subsequent suspension, cost recovery of the gasifier portions became no longer probable; therefore, Mississippi Power recorded an additional charge to income in June 2017 of $2.8 billion ($2.0 billion after tax), which included estimated costs associated with the gasifier portions of the plant and lignite mine. During the third and fourth quarters of 2017, Mississippi Power recorded charges to income of $242 million ($206 million after tax), including $164 million for ongoing project costs, estimated mine and gasifier-related costs, and certain termination costs during the suspension period prior to conclusion of the Kemper Settlement Docket, as well as the charge associated with the Kemper Settlement Agreement discussed below. Additional pre-tax cancellation costs, including mine and plant closure and contract termination costs, currently estimated at approximately $50 million to $100 million (excluding salvage), are expected to be incurred in 2018. Mississippi Power has begun efforts to dispose of or abandon the mine and gasifier-related assets.
Rate Recovery
Kemper Settlement Agreement
On February 6, 2018, the Mississippi PSC voted to approve the Kemper Settlement Agreement. The Kemper Settlement Agreement provides for an annual revenue requirement of approximately $99.3 million for costshigher AFUDC base related to the Kemper County energy facility, which includes the impact of Tax Reform Legislation. The revenue requirement is based on (i) a fixed ROE for 2018 of 8.6% excluding any performance adjustment, (ii) a ROE for 2019 calculated in accordance with PEP, excluding the performance adjustment, (iii) for future years, a performance-based ROE calculated pursuant to PEP,steam and (iv) amortization periods for the related regulatory assets and liabilities of eight years and six years, respectively. The revenue requirement alsotransmission construction projects at Alabama Power.
    Table of Contents                                Index to Financial Statements

NOTESMANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS (continued)
Southern Company and Subsidiary Companies 20172018 Annual Report


AFUDC equity decreased $48 million, or 24.0%, in 2017 as compared to the prior year primarily due to Mississippi Power's suspension of the Kemper IGCC in June 2017.
See Note 2 to the financial statements under "Mississippi PowerKemper County Energy Facility" for additional information.
Interest Expense, Net of Amounts Capitalized
Interest expense, net of amounts capitalized increased $24 million, or 2.4%, in 2018 as compared to the prior year. The increase was primarily related to Mississippi Power and reflects a disallowance$33 million net reduction in interest recorded in 2017 following a settlement with the IRS related to research and experimental deductions and a portion$29 million reduction in interest capitalized related to the Kemper IGCC suspension in June 2017. The increase also reflects an increase in outstanding borrowings and higher interest rates at Alabama Power, partially offset by a decrease in outstanding borrowings at Georgia Power. See Note 10 to the financial statements under "Section 174 Research and Experimental Deduction" for additional information.
Interest expense, net of amounts capitalized increased $80 million, or 8.6%, in 2017 as compared to the prior year primarily due to an increase in average outstanding long-term debt, primarily at Southern Power and Georgia Power, and a $37 million decrease in interest capitalized, primarily at Southern Power and Mississippi Power, partially offset by a net reduction of $33 million following Mississippi Power's settlement with the IRS related to research and experimental deductions. See Note 10 to the financial statements under "Unrecognized Tax Benefits" for additional information.
See Note 8 to the financial statements for additional information.
Other Income (Expense), Net
Other income (expense), net increased $17 million, or 13.4%, in 2018 as compared to the prior year primarily due to the settlement of Mississippi Power's Deepwater Horizon claim in May 2018 and a gain from a joint-development wind project at Southern Power, which is attributable to Southern Power's partner in the project and fully offset within noncontrolling interests, partially offset by an increase in charitable donations. See Note 3 to the financial statements under "General Litigation Matters– Mississippi Power" and Note 7 to the financial statements under "Southern Power" for additional information.
Other income (expense), net increased $58 million, or 84.1%, in 2017 as compared to the prior year primarily due to a decrease in non-service cost components of net periodic pension and other postretirement benefits costs, partially offset by increases in charitable donations. The change also includes an increase of $159 million in currency losses arising from a translation of euro-denominated fixed-rate notes into U.S. dollars, fully offset by an equal change in gains on the foreign currency hedges that were reclassified from accumulated OCI into earnings at Southern Power. See Note 1 under "Recently Adopted Accounting Standards" and Note 11 to the financial statements for additional information on net periodic pension and other postretirement benefit costs.
Income Taxes
Income taxes increased $125 million, or 152.4%, in 2018 as compared to the prior year. The increase was primarily due to an increase in pre-tax earnings, primarily resulting from charges recorded in 2017 related to the Kemper IGCC at Mississippi Power, partially offset by the estimated probable loss on Plant Vogtle Units 3 and 4 at Georgia Power recognized in the second quarter 2018. This increase was partially offset by lower federal income tax expense, as well as benefits from the flowback of excess deferred income taxes as a result of the Tax Reform Legislation.
Income taxes decreased $1.0 billion, or 92.5%, in 2017 as compared to the prior year primarily due to $809 million in tax benefits related to estimated losses on the Kemper IGCC at Mississippi Power and $346 million in net tax benefits resulting from the Tax Reform Legislation.
See Note 10 to the financial statements for additional information.
Dividends on Preferred and Preference Stock of Subsidiaries
Dividends on preferred and preference stock of subsidiaries decreased $22 million, or 57.9%, in 2018 as compared to 2017 and decreased $7 million, or 15.6%, in 2017 as compared to 2016. These decreases were primarily due to the 2017 redemptions of all outstanding shares of preferred and preference stock at Georgia Power and Gulf Power. See Note 8 to the financial statements for additional information.
Net Income Attributable to Noncontrolling Interests
Substantially all noncontrolling interests relate to renewable projects at Southern Power. Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests increased $13 million, or 28.3%, in 2018, as compared to the prior year. The increase was primarily due to $20 million of net income allocations due to the sale of a noncontrolling 33% equity interest in SP Solar in 2018 and $14

MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS (continued)
Southern Company and Subsidiary Companies 2018 Annual Report


million of other income allocations attributable to a joint-development wind project, partially offset by a reduction of $19 million due to HLBV income allocations between Southern Power and tax equity partners for partnerships entered into during 2018. In 2017, noncontrolling interests increased $10 million, or 28%, compared to 2016 primarily due to additional net income allocations from new solar partnerships.
See Note 15 under "Southern Power" for additional information.
Gas Business
Southern Company Gas distributes natural gas through utilities in four states and is involved in several other complementary businesses including gas pipeline investments, wholesale gas services, and gas marketing services.
A condensed statement of income for the gas business follows:
 Amount Increase (Decrease)
from Prior Year
 2018 2018 2017
 (in millions)
Operating revenues$3,909
 $(11) $2,268
Cost of natural gas1,539
 (62) 988
Cost of other sales12
 (17) 19
Other operations and maintenance981
 36
 424
Depreciation and amortization500
 (1) 263
Taxes other than income taxes211
 27
 113
Impairment charges42
 42
 
Gain on dispositions, net(291) (291) 
Total operating expenses2,994
 (266) 1,807
Operating income915
 255
 461
Earnings from equity method investments148
 42
 46
Interest expense, net of amounts capitalized228
 28
 119
Other income (expense), net1
 (43) 32
Income taxes464
 97
 291
Net income$372
 $129
 $129
In the table above, the 2018 changes for Southern Company Gas reflect the year ended December 31, 2018 compared to 2017. The Southern Company Gas Dispositions were completed by July 29, 2018 and represent the primary variance driver for the 2018 changes. Additional detailed variance explanations are provided herein. The 2017 changes reflect the 12-month period in 2017 compared to the six-month period following the Merger closing on July 1, 2016, which is the primary variance driver. Additionally, earnings from equity method investments include Southern Company Gas' acquisition of a 50% equity interest in SNG completed in September 2016. See Note 15 to the financial statements under "Southern Company Gas" for additional information on Southern Company Gas' investment in SNG and the Kemper CountySouthern Company Gas Dispositions.
Seasonality of Results
During the period from November through March when natural gas usage and operating revenues are generally higher (Heating Season), more customers are connected to Southern Company Gas' distribution systems, and natural gas usage is higher in periods of colder weather. Occasionally in the summer, operating revenues are impacted due to peak usage by power generators in response to summer energy facility requested for inclusion in ratedemands. Southern Company Gas' base whichoperating expenses, excluding cost of natural gas, bad debt expense, and certain incentive compensation costs, are incurred relatively equally over any given year. Thus, operating results can vary significantly from quarter to quarter as a result of seasonality. For 2018, the percentage of operating revenues and net income generated during the Heating Season (January through March and November through December) were 68.7% and 96.0%, respectively. For 2017, the percentage of operating revenues and net income generated during the Heating Season were 67.3% and 73.7%, respectively. The 2017 net income generated during the Heating Season was significantly impacted by additional tax expense recorded in the fourth quarter 2017resulting from the Tax Reform Legislation. See FUTURE EARNINGS POTENTIAL – "Income Tax MattersFederal Tax Reform Legislation" herein for additional information.

MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS (continued)
Southern Company and Subsidiary Companies 2018 Annual Report


Operating Revenues
Operating revenues in 2018 were $3.9 billion, reflecting an $11 million decrease from 2017. Details of operating revenues were as an additional chargefollows:
 (in millions) (% change)
Operating revenues – prior year$3,920
  
Estimated change resulting from –   
Infrastructure replacement programs and base rate changes31
 0.8
Gas costs and other cost recovery3
 0.1
Weather13
 0.3
Wholesale gas services138
 3.5
Southern Company Gas Dispositions(*)
(228) (5.8)
Other32
 0.8
Operating revenues – current year$3,909
 (0.3)%
(*)Includes a $154 million decrease related to natural gas revenues, including alternative revenue programs, and a $74 million decrease related to other revenues. See Note 15 to the financial statements under "Southern Company Gas" for additional information.
Revenues from infrastructure replacement programs and base rate changes increased in 2018 primarily due to income of approximately $78a $48 million ($85increase at Nicor Gas, partially offset by a $12 million net of accumulated depreciation of $7 million) pre-tax ($48 million after tax).
Underdecrease at Atlanta Gas Light. These amounts include the Kemper Settlement Agreement, retail customer rates will reflect a reduction of approximately $26.8 million annuallynatural gas distribution utilities' continued investments recovered through infrastructure replacement programs and include no recoverybase rate increases less revenue reductions for costs associated with the gasifier portionimpacts of the Kemper County energy facilityTax Reform Legislation. See Note 2 to the financial statements under "Southern Company Gas" for additional information.
Revenues increased due to colder weather, as determined by Heating Degree Days, in 2018 or at any future date. On February 12,compared to 2017.
Revenues from wholesale gas services increased in 2018 Mississippi Power madeprimarily due to increased commercial activity, partially offset by derivative losses.
Other revenues increased in 2018 primarily due to a $15 million increase from the required compliance filing with the Mississippi PSC. The Kemper Settlement Agreement also requires (i) the CPCNDalton Pipeline being placed in service in August 2017 and a $14 million increase in Nicor Gas' revenue taxes.
Natural gas distribution rates include provisions to adjust billings for the Kemper County energy facility to be modified to limit it tofluctuations in natural gas combined cycle operationcosts. Therefore, gas costs recovered through natural gas revenues generally equal the amount expensed in cost of natural gas and (ii) Mississippi Powerdo not affect net income from the natural gas distribution utilities.
Cost of Natural Gas
Excluding Atlanta Gas Light, which does not sell natural gas to fileend-use customers, the natural gas distribution utilities charge their utility customers for natural gas consumed using natural gas cost recovery mechanisms set by the applicable state regulatory agencies. Under these mechanisms, all prudently-incurred natural gas costs are passed through to customers without markup, subject to regulatory review. The natural gas distribution utilities defer or accrue the difference between the actual cost of natural gas and the amount of commodity revenue earned in a reserve margin plan withgiven period. The deferred or accrued amount is either billed or refunded to customers prospectively through adjustments to the Mississippi PSC by August 2018.
As of December 31, 2017, the balances associated with the Kemper County energy facilitycommodity rate. Deferred natural gas costs are reflected as regulatory assets and liabilities were $114accrued natural gas costs are reflected as regulatory liabilities. Therefore, gas costs recovered through natural gas revenues generally equal the amount expensed in cost of natural gas and do not affect net income from the natural gas distribution utilities. Cost of natural gas at the natural gas distribution utilities represented 83.2% of the total cost of natural gas for 2018.
Gas marketing services customers are charged for actual and estimated natural gas consumed. Cost of natural gas includes the cost of fuel and associated transportation costs, lost and unaccounted for gas, adjustments to reduce the value of inventories to market value, if applicable, and gains and losses associated with certain derivatives.
Cost of natural gas in 2018 was $1.5 billion, a decrease of $62 million, and $26 million, respectively.
Asor 3.9%, compared to 2017, which was substantially all as a result of the Mississippi PSC order on February 6,Southern Company Gas Dispositions.

MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS (continued)
Southern Company and Subsidiary Companies 2018 rate recoveryAnnual Report


Cost of Other Sales
Cost of other sales in 2018 was $12 million, a decrease of $17 million, or 58.6%, compared to 2017 primarily related to the disposition of Pivotal Home Solutions.
Other Operations and Maintenance Expenses
Other operations and maintenance expenses increased $36 million, or 3.8%, in 2018 compared to the prior year. Excluding a $39 million decrease related to the Southern Company Gas Dispositions, other operations and maintenance expenses increased $75 million. This increase was primarily due to a $53 million increase in compensation and benefit costs, including a $12 million one-time increase for the Kemper Countyadoption of a new paid time off policy to align with the Southern Company system, a $28 million increase in disposition-related costs, and an $11 million expense for a litigation settlement to facilitate the sale of Pivotal Home Solutions. These increases were partially offset by a $27 million decrease in bad debt expense primarily at Nicor Gas, which was offset by a decrease in revenues as a result of the related regulatory recovery mechanism. See Note 3 to the financial statements under "General Litigation Matters – Southern Company Gas" for additional information on the litigation settlement.
Depreciation and Amortization
Depreciation and amortization decreased $1 million, or 0.2%, in 2018 compared to the prior year. Excluding a $37 million decrease related to the Southern Company Gas Dispositions, depreciation and amortization increased $36 million. The increase was primarily due to continued infrastructure investments at the natural gas distribution utilities, partially offset by lower amortization of intangible assets as a result of fair value adjustments in acquisition accounting at gas marketing services. See Note 2 to the financial statements under "Southern Company Gas" for additional information on infrastructure replacement programs.
Taxes Other Than Income Taxes
Taxes other than income taxes increased $27 million, or 14.7%, in 2018 compared to the prior year. Excluding a $4 million decrease related to the Southern Company Gas Dispositions, taxes other than income taxes increased $31 million. This increase primarily reflects a $13 million increase in revenue tax expenses as a result of higher natural gas revenues, a $12 million increase in Nicor Gas' invested capital tax that reflects a $7 million credit in 2017 to establish a related regulatory asset, and a $4 million increase in property taxes. See Note 15 to the financial statements under "Southern Company Gas" for additional information on the Southern Company Gas Dispositions.
Impairment Charges
A goodwill impairment charge of $42 million was recorded in 2018 in contemplation of the sale of Pivotal Home Solutions. See Notes 1 and 15 to the financial statements under "Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets and Liabilities" and "Southern Company GasSale of Pivotal Home Solutions," respectively, for additional information.
Gain on Dispositions, Net
Gain on dispositions, net was $291 million in 2018 and was associated with the Southern Company Gas Dispositions. The income tax expense on these gains included income tax expense on goodwill not deductible for tax purposes and for which a deferred tax liability had not been recorded previously.
Earnings from Equity Method Investments
Earnings from equity method investments increased $42 million, or 39.6%, in 2018 compared to the prior year. The increase was primarily due to higher earnings from Southern Company Gas' equity method investment in SNG from new rates effective September 2018 and lower operations and maintenance expenses due to the timing of pipeline maintenance. See Note 7 to the financial statements under "Southern Company GasEquity Method Investments" for additional information.
Interest Expense, Net of Amounts Capitalized
Interest expense, net of amounts capitalized increased $28 million, or 14.0%, in 2018 compared to the prior year. The increase was primarily due to $21 million of additional interest expense related to new debt issuances and a $4 million reduction in capitalized interest primarily due to the Dalton Pipeline being placed in service in August 2017.
Other Income (Expense), Net
Other income (expense), net decreased $43 million, or 97.7%, in 2018 compared to the prior year. Excluding a $3 million decrease related to the Southern Company Gas Dispositions, other income (expense), net decreased $40 million. This decrease

MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS (continued)
Southern Company and Subsidiary Companies 2018 Annual Report


was primarily due to a $23 million increase in charitable donations and a $13 million decrease in gains from the settlement of contractor litigation claims. See Note 2 to the financial statements under "Southern Company GasInfrastructure Replacement Programs and Capital Projects– PRP" for additional information on the contractor litigation settlement.
Income Taxes
Income taxes increased $97 million, or 26.4%, in 2018 compared to the prior year. Excluding a $329 million increase related to the Southern Company Gas Dispositions, including tax expense on the goodwill for which a deferred tax liability had not been previously provided, income taxes decreased $232 million. This decrease was primarily due to a lower federal income tax rate and the flowback of excess deferred taxes as a result of the Tax Reform Legislation. In addition, 2017 included additional tax expense of $130 million from the revaluation of deferred tax assets associated with the Tax Reform Legislation, the enactment of the State of Illinois income tax legislation, and new income tax apportionment factors in several states. See Note 10 to the financial statements for additional information.
Other Business Activities
Southern Company's other business activities primarily include the parent company (which does not allocate operating expenses to business units); PowerSecure, which was acquired on May 9, 2016 and is a provider of energy facilitysolutions, including distributed infrastructure, energy efficiency products and services, and utility infrastructure services, to customers; Southern Company Holdings, Inc. (Southern Holdings), which invests in various projects, including leveraged lease projects; and Southern Linc, which provides digital wireless communications for use by Southern Company and its subsidiary companies and also markets these services to the public and provides fiber optics services within the Southeast.
A condensed statement of income for Southern Company's other business activities follows:
 Amount 
Increase (Decrease)
from Prior Year
 2018 2018 2017
 (in millions)
Operating revenues$1,015
 $444
 $268
Cost of other sales728
 313
 223
Other operations and maintenance273
 69
 9
Depreciation and amortization66
 14
 21
Taxes other than income taxes6
 3
 
Impairment charges12
 12
 
Total operating expenses1,085
 411
 253
Operating income (loss)(70) 33
 15
Interest expense579
 96
 178
Other income (expense), net(23) (23) 30
Income taxes (benefit)(222) 85
 (91)
Net income (loss)$(450) $(171) $(42)
In the table above, the 2018 changes for these other business activities reflect the inclusion of PowerSecure for the year ended December 31, 2018 compared to 2017. The 2017 changes reflect the inclusion of PowerSecure for the 12-month period in 2017 compared to the eight-month period following the acquisition on May 9, 2016, which is resolved,the primary variance driver. Additional detailed variance explanations are provided herein. See Note 15 to the financial statements under "Southern Company Acquisition of PowerSecure" for additional information.
Operating Revenues
Southern Company's operating revenues for these other business activities increased $444 million, or 77.8%, in 2018 as compared to the prior year. The increase was primarily related to PowerSecure's storm restoration services in Puerto Rico.
Cost of Other Sales
Cost of other sales for these other business activities increased $313 million, or 75.4% in 2018. The increase was primarily related to PowerSecure's storm restoration services in Puerto Rico.

MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS (continued)
Southern Company and Subsidiary Companies 2018 Annual Report


Other Operations and Maintenance Expenses
Other operations and maintenance expenses for these other business activities increased $69 million, or 33.8%, in 2018 as compared to the prior year. The increase was primarily due to PowerSecure's storm restoration services in Puerto Rico and parent company expenses related to the sale of Gulf Power. Other operations and maintenance expenses for these other business activities increased $9 million, or 4.6%, in 2017 as compared to the prior year. The increase was primarily due to a $44 million increase as a result of the inclusion of PowerSecure results for the 12-month period in 2017 compared to eight months in 2016, partially offset by a $35 million decrease in parent company expenses related to the Merger and the acquisition of PowerSecure.
Impairment Charges
Impairment charges for these other business activities were $12 million in 2018. These charges were associated with Southern Linc's tower leases and were recorded in contemplation of the sale of Gulf Power.
Interest Expense
Interest expense for these other business activities increased $96 million, or 19.9%, in 2018 as compared to the prior year primarily due to an increase in variable interest rates and average outstanding debt at the parent company. Interest expense for these other business activities increased $178 million, or 58.4%, in 2017 as compared to the prior year primarily due to an increase in average outstanding long-term debt at the parent company. See Note 8 to the financial statements for additional information.
Other Income (Expense), Net
Other income (expense), net for these other business activities decreased $23 million in 2018 as compared to the prior year primarily due to charitable donations, partially offset by leveraged lease income at Southern Holdings. See Note 1 to the financial statements for additional information. Other income (expense), net for these other business activities increased $30 million in 2017 as compared to the prior year primarily due to expenses associated with bridge financing for the Merger in 2016.
Income Taxes (Benefit)
The income tax benefit for these other business activities decreased $85 million, or 27.7%, in 2018 as compared to the prior year primarily as a result of the Tax Reform Legislation, partially offset by an increase in pre-tax losses at the parent company. The income tax benefit for these other business activities increased $91 million, or 42.1%, in 2017 as compared to the prior year primarily as a result of pre-tax earnings (losses) and net tax benefits related to the Tax Reform Legislation. See FUTURE EARNINGS POTENTIAL – "Income Tax MattersFederal Tax Reform Legislation" herein and Note 10 to the financial statements for additional information.
Effects of Inflation
The electric operating companies and natural gas distribution utilities are subject to any future legal challenges.rate regulation that is generally based on the recovery of historical and projected costs. The effects of inflation can create an economic loss since the recovery of costs could be in dollars that have less purchasing power. Southern Power is party to long-term contracts reflecting market-based rates, including inflation expectations. Any adverse effect of inflation on Southern Company's results of operations has not been substantial in recent years.
2015 Rate Case
On December 3, 2015, the Mississippi PSC issued the In-Service Asset Rate Order regarding the Kemper County energy facility assets that were commercially operational and currentlyFUTURE EARNINGS POTENTIAL
General
The traditional electric operating companies operate as vertically integrated utilities providing electric service to customers (the transmission facilities, combined cycle,within their service territories in the Southeast. On January 1, 2019, Southern Company completed the sale of Gulf Power, one of the traditional electric operating companies, to NextEra Energy. The natural gas pipeline,distribution utilities provide service to customers in their service territories in Illinois, Georgia, Virginia, and water pipeline)Tennessee. In July 2018, Southern Company Gas completed sales of three of its natural gas distribution utilities. Prices for electricity provided and natural gas distributed to retail customers are set by state PSCs or other related costs. The In-Service Asset Rate Order providedapplicable state regulatory agencies under cost-based regulatory principles. Retail rates and earnings are reviewed and may be adjusted periodically within certain limitations. Prices for retail rate recoverywholesale electricity sales and natural gas distribution, interconnecting transmission lines, and the exchange of an annual revenue requirementelectric power are regulated by the FERC. Southern Power continues to focus on long-term PPAs. In 2018, Southern Power completed sales of approximately $126 million, based on Mississippi Power's actual average capital structure, with a maximum common equity percentagenoncontrolling interests in entities indirectly owning substantially all of 49.733%, a 9.225% return on common equity,its solar facilities and actual embedded interest costs. The In-Service Asset Rate Ordereight of its wind facilities and also included a prudence finding of all costs in the stipulated revenue requirement calculation for the in-service assets.
In connection with the implementation of the In-Service Asset Rate Order and wholesale rates, Mississippi Power began expensing certain ongoing project costs and certain retail debt carrying costs that previously were deferred and began amortizing certain regulatory assets associated with assets placed in service and consulting and legal fees over periods ranging from two years to 10 years. On July 6, 2017, the Mississippi PSC issued an order requiring Mississippi Power to establish a regulatory liability account to maintain current rates related to the Kemper County energy facility following the July 2017 completion of the amortization period for certain of these regulatory assets.
Lignite Mine and CO2 Pipeline Facilities
Mississippi Power owns the lignite mine and equipment and mineral reserves located around the Kemper County energy facility site. The mine started commercial operation in June 2013.
In 2010, Mississippi Power executed a 40-year management fee contract with Liberty Fuels Company, LLC (Liberty Fuels), a wholly-owned subsidiary of The North American Coal Corporation, which developed, constructed, and is responsible for the mining operations through the end of the mine reclamation. As the mining permit holder, Liberty Fuels has a legal obligation to perform mine reclamation and Mississippi Power has a contractual obligation to fund all reclamation activities. Mississippi Power expects mine reclamation to begin in 2018. In addition to the obligation to fund the reclamation activities, Mississippi Power provided working capital support to Liberty Fuels through cash advances for capital purchases, payroll, and other operating expenses.
In addition, Mississippi Power constructed the CO2 pipeline for the planned transport of captured CO2 for use in enhanced oil recoverycompleted sales and entered into an agreement to sell certain of its natural gas plants. See ACCOUNTING POLICIES – "Application of Critical Accounting Policies

MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS (continued)
Southern Company and Subsidiary Companies 2018 Annual Report


and EstimatesUtility Regulation" herein and Note 2 to the financial statements for additional information about regulatory matters.
The results of operations for the past three years are not necessarily indicative of Southern Company's future earnings potential. Future earnings will be impacted by the 2018 disposition activities described herein and in Note 15 to the financial statements. The level of Southern Company's future earnings depends on numerous factors that affect the opportunities, challenges, and risks of the Southern Company system's primary businesses of selling electricity and distributing natural gas. These factors include the traditional electric operating companies' and the natural gas distribution utilities' ability to maintain constructive regulatory environments that allow for the timely recovery of prudently-incurred costs during a time of increasing costs, continued customer growth, and, for the traditional electric operating companies, the weak pace of growth in electricity use per customer, especially in residential and commercial markets. Plant Vogtle Units 3 and 4 construction and rate recovery and the profitability of Southern Power's competitive wholesale business are also major factors.
Earnings in the electricity business will also depend upon maintaining and growing sales, considering, among other things, the adoption and/or penetration rates of increasingly energy-efficient technologies, increasing volumes of electronic commerce transactions, and more multi-family home construction, all of which could contribute to a net reduction in customer usage. Earnings for both the electricity and natural gas businesses are subject to a variety of other factors. These factors include weather, competition, new energy contracts with Denbury Onshore (Denbury)other utilities and other wholesale customers, energy conservation practiced by customers, the use of alternative energy sources by customers, the prices of electricity and natural gas, the price elasticity of demand, and the rate of economic growth or decline in the service territory. In addition, the level of future earnings for the wholesale electric business also depends on numerous factors including regulatory matters, creditworthiness of customers, total electric generating capacity available and related costs, the development or acquisition of renewable facilities and other energy projects, and the successful remarketing of capacity as current contracts expire. Demand for electricity and natural gas is primarily driven by the pace of economic growth that may be affected by changes in regional and global economic conditions, which may impact future earnings. In addition, the volatility of natural gas prices has a significant impact on the natural gas distribution utilities' customer rates, long-term competitive position against other energy sources, and the ability of Southern Company Gas' gas marketing services and wholesale gas services businesses to capture value from locational and seasonal spreads. Additionally, changes in commodity prices subject a significant portion of Southern Company Gas' operations to earnings variability.
As part of its ongoing effort to adapt to changing market conditions, Southern Company continues to evaluate and consider a wide array of potential business strategies. These strategies may include business combinations, partnerships, and acquisitions involving other utility or non-utility businesses or properties, disposition of certain assets or businesses, internal restructuring, or some combination thereof. Furthermore, Southern Company may engage in new business ventures that arise from competitive and regulatory changes in the utility industry. Pursuit of any of the above strategies, or any combination thereof, may significantly affect the business operations, risks, and financial condition of Southern Company.
On January 1, 2019, Southern Company completed the sale of Gulf Power to NextEra Energy for an aggregate cash purchase price of approximately $5.8 billion (less $1.3 billion of indebtedness assumed), subject to customary working capital adjustments. In 2018, net income attributable to Gulf Power was $160 million.
On June 4, 2018, Southern Company Gas completed the capturedstock sale of Pivotal Home Solutions to American Water Enterprises LLC for a total cash purchase price of $365 million. On July 1, 2018, a Southern Company Gas subsidiary, Pivotal Utility Holdings, completed the sales of the assets of two of its natural gas distribution utilities, Elizabethtown Gas and Elkton Gas, to South Jersey Industries, Inc. for a total cash purchase price of $1.7 billion. On July 29, 2018, Southern Company Gas and its wholly-owned direct subsidiary, NUI Corporation, completed the stock sale of Pivotal Utility Holdings, which primarily consisted of Florida City Gas, to NextEra Energy for a total cash purchase price of $587 million. The total cash purchase price for each transaction includes final working capital and other adjustments.
The Southern Company Gas Dispositions resulted in a net loss of $51 million, which includes $342 million of tax expense. The after-tax impacts of these dispositions included income tax expense on goodwill not deductible for tax purposes and for which a deferred tax liability had not been recorded previously. In addition, a goodwill impairment charge of $42 million was recorded during 2018 in contemplation of the sale of Pivotal Home Solutions.
On May 22, 2018, Southern Power sold a noncontrolling 33% equity interest in SP Solar, a limited partnership indirectly owning substantially all of Southern Power's solar facilities, for approximately $1.2 billion and, on December 11, 2018, sold a noncontrolling tax equity interest in SP Wind, a holding company owning a portfolio of eight operating wind facilities, for approximately $1.2 billion. Additionally, on November 5, 2018, Southern Power entered into an agreement to sell all of its equity interests in Plant Mankato (including the 385-MW expansion currently under construction) for an aggregate purchase price of approximately $650 million. The completion of the disposition is subject to the expansion unit reaching commercial operation as well as various other customary conditions to closing, including FERC and state commission approvals, and the sale is expected

MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS (continued)
Southern Company and Subsidiary Companies 2018 Annual Report


to close mid-2019. The ultimate outcome of this matter cannot be determined at this time. On December 4, 2018, Southern Power sold of all of its equity interests in the Florida Plants to NextEra Energy for approximately $203 million.
See Note 15 to the financial statements for additional information regarding disposition activities.
Environmental Matters
The Southern Company system's operations are regulated by state and federal environmental agencies through a variety of laws and regulations governing air, water, land, and protection of other natural resources. The Southern Company system maintains comprehensive environmental compliance and GHG strategies to assess upcoming requirements and compliance costs associated with these environmental laws and regulations. The costs, including capital expenditures, operations and maintenance costs, and costs reflected in ARO liabilities, required to comply with environmental laws and regulations and to achieve stated goals may impact future electric generating unit retirement and replacement decisions, results of operations, cash flows, and/or financial condition. Related costs may result from the installation of additional environmental controls, closure and monitoring of CCR facilities, unit retirements, or changing fuel sources for certain existing units, as well as related upgrades to the Southern Company system's transmission and distribution (electric and natural gas) systems. A major portion of these costs is expected to be recovered through retail and wholesale rates. The ultimate impact of environmental laws and regulations and the GHG goals discussed herein will depend on various factors, such as state adoption and implementation of requirements, the availability and cost of any deployed technology, fuel prices, and the outcome of pending and/or future legal challenges.
New or revised environmental laws and regulations could affect many areas of the traditional electric operating companies', Southern Power's, and the natural gas distribution utilities' operations. The impact of any such changes cannot be determined at this time. Environmental compliance costs could affect earnings if such costs cannot continue to be recovered in rates on a timely basis for the traditional electric operating companies and the natural gas distribution utilities or through long-term wholesale agreements for the traditional electric operating companies and Southern Power. Further, increased costs that are recovered through regulated rates could contribute to reduced demand for electricity and natural gas, which could negatively affect results of operations, cash flows, and/or financial condition. Additionally, many commercial and industrial customers may also be affected by existing and future environmental requirements, which for some may have the potential to ultimately affect their demand for electricity and natural gas.
The Southern Company system's commitment to the environment has been demonstrated in many ways, including participating in partnerships resulting in approximately $140 million of funding that has restored or enhanced more than 2 million acres of habitat since 2003; the removal of more than 15.5 million pounds of trash and debris from waterways between 2000 and 2018 through the Renew Our Rivers program; a 21.2% reduction in surface water withdrawal from 2015 to 2017; reductions in SO2 and NOX air emissions of 98% and 89%, respectively, from 1990 to 2017; the reduction of mercury air emissions of over 95% from 2005 to 2017; and the Southern Company system's changing energy mix.
Through 2018, the traditional electric operating companies have invested approximately $14.2 billion in environmental capital retrofit projects to comply with environmental requirements, with annual totals of approximately $1.3 billion, $0.9 billion, and $0.5 billion for 2018, 2017, and 2016, respectively. Although the timing, requirements, and estimated costs could change as environmental laws and regulations are adopted or modified, as compliance plans are revised or updated, and as legal challenges to rules are initiated or completed, the Southern Company system's current compliance strategy estimates capital expenditures of $1.4 billion from 2019 through 2023, with annual totals of approximately $0.5 billion, $0.2 billion, $0.3 billion, $0.3 billion, and $0.2 billion for 2019, 2020, 2021, 2022, and 2023, respectively. These estimates do not include any potential compliance costs associated with pending regulation of CO2. Denbury emissions from fossil fuel-fired electric generating units. See "Global Climate Issues" herein for additional information. The Southern Company system also anticipates substantial expenditures associated with ash pond closure and ground water monitoring under the CCR Rule, which are reflected in Southern Company's ARO liabilities. See FINANCIAL CONDITION AND LIQUIDITY – "Capital Requirements and Contractual Obligations" herein and Note 6 to the financial statements for additional information.
Environmental Laws and Regulations
Air Quality
The EPA has set National Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS) for six air pollutants (carbon monoxide, lead, nitrogen dioxide, ozone, particulate matter, and SO2) to protect and improve the rightnation's air quality, which it reviews and revises periodically. Following a NAAQS revision, states are required to terminatedevelop an EPA-approved plan to protect air quality. These state plans can require additional emission controls, improvements in control efficiency, or fuel changes which can result in increased compliance and operational costs. NAAQS requirements can also adversely affect the contract at any timesiting of new electric generating facilities. All areas within the Southern Company system's electric service territory have been designated as attainment for all NAAQS

MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS (continued)
Southern Company and Subsidiary Companies 2018 Annual Report


except for a seven-county area within metropolitan Atlanta that is not in attainment with the 2015 ozone NAAQS and the area surrounding Plant Hammond, in Georgia, which will not be designated attainment or nonattainment for the 2010 SO2 standard until December 2020. If areas are designated as nonattainment in the future, increased compliance costs could result. See "Regulatory Matters – Georgia Power – Integrated Resource Plan" herein for information regarding Georgia Power's request to decertify and retire Plant Hammond.
In 2011, the EPA finalized the Cross-State Air Pollution Rule (CSAPR) to address impacts of SO2 and NOX emissions from fossil fuel-fired electric generating plants. CSAPR establishes emissions trading programs and budgets for certain states and allocates emissions allowances for sources in those states. In 2016, the EPA published a final rule establishing more stringent ozone season NOX emissions budgets in Alabama, Mississippi, and Texas. Georgia's ozone season NOX emissions budget remained unchanged. The EPA also removed North Carolina from this particular CSAPR program. The outcome of ongoing CSAPR litigation concerning the 2016 CSAPR rule, to which Mississippi Power is a party, could have an impact on the State of Mississippi's ozone season NOX emissions budget. Increases in either future fossil fuel-fired generation or the availability or cost of CSAPR allowances could have a negative financial impact on results of operations for Southern Company.
The EPA finalized regional haze regulations in 2005 and 2017. These regulations require states, tribal governments, and various federal agencies to develop and implement plans to reduce pollutants that impair visibility and demonstrate reasonable progress toward the goal of restoring natural visibility conditions in certain areas, including national parks and wilderness areas. States must submit a revised state implementation plan (SIP) to the EPA demonstrating continued reasonable progress towards achieving visibility improvement goals. These plans could require reductions in certain pollutants, such as particulate matter, SO2, and NOX, which could result in increased compliance costs. The EPA approved the regional progress SIPs for the States of Alabama and Georgia, but only issued a limited approval of the regional progress SIP for the State of Mississippi because Mississippi must revise the best available retrofit technology (BART) provisions of its SIP. Therefore, Mississippi Power's Plant Daniel is the only electric generating unit in the Southern Company system that continues to be evaluated under the regional haze BART provisions. Mississippi Power didis required to submit Plant Daniel's BART analysis to the State of Mississippi by summer 2019. Requirements for further reduction of these pollutants at Plant Daniel could increase compliance costs.
Water Quality
In 2014, the EPA finalized requirements under Section 316(b) of the Clean Water Act (CWA) to regulate cooling water intake structures (CWIS) to minimize their effects on fish and other aquatic life at existing power plants (e.g. coal, natural gas, oil, and nuclear generating plants) and manufacturing facilities. The regulation requires plant-specific studies to determine applicable CWIS changes to protect organisms that either get caught on the intake screens (impingement) or are drawn into the cooling system (entrainment). The Southern Company system is conducting these studies and currently anticipates applicable CWIS changes may include fish-friendly CWIS screens with fish return systems and minor additions of monitoring equipment at certain plants. However, the ultimate impact of this rule will depend on the outcome of these plant-specific studies, any additional protective measures required to be incorporated into each plant's National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit based on site-specific factors, and the outcome of any legal challenges.
In 2015, the EPA finalized the steam electric effluent limitations guidelines (ELG) rule (2015 ELG Rule) that set national standards for wastewater discharges from new and existing steam electric generating units generating greater than 50 MWs. The 2015 ELG Rule prohibits effluent discharges of certain waste streams and imposes stringent limits on flue gas desulfurization (scrubber) wastewater discharges. The revised technology-based limits and the CCR Rule require extensive changes to existing ash and wastewater management systems or the installation and operation of new ash and wastewater management systems. Compliance with the 2015 ELG Rule is expected to require capital expenditures and increased operational costs primarily for the traditional electric operating companies' coal-fired electric generation. State environmental agencies will incorporate specific compliance applicability dates in the NPDES permitting process for each ELG waste stream no later than December 31, 2023. The EPA is scheduled to issue a new rulemaking by December 2019 that could revise the limitations and applicability dates of two of the waste streams regulated in the 2015 ELG Rule. The impact of any changes to the 2015 ELG Rule will depend on the content of the new rule and the outcome of any legal challenges.
In 2015, the EPA and the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (Corps) jointly published a final rule that revised the regulatory definition of waters of the United States (WOTUS) for all CWA programs. The rule significantly expanded the scope of federal jurisdiction over waterbodies (such as rivers, streams, canals, and wastewater treatment ponds), which could impact new generation projects and permitting and reporting requirements associated with the installation, expansion, and maintenance of transmission, distribution, and pipeline projects. The EPA and the Corps are expected to publish a final rule in 2019 to replace the 2015 WOTUS definition. The impact of any changes to the 2015 WOTUS rule will depend on the content of this final rule and the outcome of any legal challenges.

MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS (continued)
Southern Company and Subsidiary Companies 2018 Annual Report


Coal Combustion Residuals
In 2015, the EPA finalized non-hazardous solid waste regulations for the disposal of CCR, including coal ash and gypsum, in landfills and surface impoundments (ash ponds) at active generating power plants. In addition to the EPA's CCR Rule, the States of Alabama and Georgia have also finalized regulations regarding the handling of CCR within their respective states. The EPA's CCR Rule requires landfills and ash ponds to be evaluated against a set of performance criteria and potentially closed if minimum criteria are not placemet. Closure of existing landfills and ash ponds could require installation of equipment and infrastructure to manage CCR in accordance with the Kemper IGCCCCR Rule. Based on cost estimates for closure and monitoring of landfills and ash ponds pursuant to the CCR Rule, the Southern Company system recorded AROs for each CCR unit in service2015. As further analysis was performed and closure details were developed, the traditional electric operating companies have continued to periodically update these cost estimates, as discussed further below.
The EPA published certain amendments to the CCR Rule, which became effective August 29, 2018. These amendments extend the date from April 2019 to October 31, 2020 to cease sending CCR and other waste streams to ash ponds that demonstrate compliance with all except two of the specified performance criteria.
On August 21, 2018, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit issued a decision suggesting the EPA should regulate previously-excluded inactive ash ponds located at retired generation facilities and questioning both the ability of unlined ash ponds to continue operating no matter the performance criteria results and the classification of clay-lined landfills and ash ponds. These developments could impact the expected timing of the traditional electric operating companies' landfill and ash pond closure activities, but the extent of any impact will depend on the outcome of ongoing litigation, anticipated EPA rulemaking action to establish further guidance, and the outcome of any legal challenges.
In June 2018, Alabama Power recorded an increase of approximately $1.2 billion to its AROs related to the CCR Rule. The revised cost estimates were based on information from feasibility studies performed on ash ponds in use at plants operated by July 1, 2017.Alabama Power, including at a plant jointly-owned by Mississippi Power. During the second quarter 2018, Alabama Power's management completed its analysis of these studies which indicated that additional closure costs, primarily related to increases in estimated ash volume, water management requirements, and design revisions, will be required to close these ash ponds under the planned closure-in-place methodology. As the level of work becomes more defined in the next 12 months, it is likely that these cost estimates will change and the change could be material.
In December 2018, Georgia Power recorded an increase of approximately $3.1 billion to its AROs related to the CCR Rule and the related state rule. During the second half of 2018, Georgia Power completed a strategic assessment related to its plans to close the ash ponds at all of its generating plants in compliance with the CCR Rule and the related state rule. This assessment included engineering and constructability studies related to design assumptions for ash pond closures and advanced engineering methods. The results indicated that additional closure costs will be required to close these ash ponds, primarily due to changes in closure strategies, the estimated amount of ash to be excavated, and additional water management requirements necessary to support closure strategies. These factors also impact the estimated timing of future cash outlays.
The traditional electric operating companies expect to periodically update their ARO cost estimates. Absent continued recovery of ARO costs through regulated rates, Southern Company's results of operations, cash flows, and financial condition could be materially impacted. See FINANCIAL CONDITION AND LIQUIDITY – "Capital Requirements and Contractual Obligations" herein and Note 6 to the financial statements for additional information.
The ultimate outcome of these matters cannot be determined at this time.
LitigationNuclear Decommissioning
On April 26, 2016, a complaint against MississippiIn June 2018, Alabama Power was filedcompleted an updated decommissioning cost site study for Plant Farley. The estimated cost of decommissioning based on the study resulted in Harrison County Circuit Court (Circuit Court) by Biloxi Freezing & Processing Inc., Gulfside Casino Partnership,an increase in Alabama Power's ARO liability of approximately $300 million. Amounts previously contributed to Alabama Power's external trust funds are currently projected to be adequate to meet the updated decommissioning obligations.
In December 2018, Georgia Power completed updated decommissioning cost site studies for Plant Hatch and John Carlton Dean,Plant Vogtle Units 1 and 2. The estimated cost of decommissioning based on the studies resulted in an increase in Georgia Power's ARO liability of approximately $130 million. Georgia Power currently collects $4 million and $2 million annually in rates, which was amendedis used to fund external nuclear decommissioning trusts for Plant Hatch and refiled on July 11, 2016Plant Vogtle Units 1 and 2, respectively. Georgia Power expects the Georgia PSC to include, among other things, Southern Company as a defendant. The individual plaintiff alleges that Mississippireview and adjust, if necessary, these amounts in the Georgia Power and Southern Company violated the Mississippi Unfair Trade Practices Act. All plaintiffs have alleged that Mississippi Power and Southern Company concealed, falsely represented, and failed to fully disclose important facts concerning the cost and schedule of the Kemper County energy facility and that these alleged breaches have unjustly enriched Mississippi Power and Southern Company. The plaintiffs seek unspecified actual damages and punitive damages; ask the Circuit Court to appoint a receiver to oversee, operate, manage, and otherwise control all affairs relating2019 Base Rate Case.
See Note 6 to the Kemper County energy facility; ask the Circuit Court tofinancial statements for additional information.
    Table of Contents                                Index to Financial Statements

NOTESMANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS (continued)
Southern Company and Subsidiary Companies 20172018 Annual Report


revoke any licenses or certificates authorizing Mississippi Power orEnvironmental Remediation
The Southern Company system must comply with environmental laws and regulations governing the handling and disposal of waste and releases of hazardous substances. Under these various laws and regulations, the Southern Company system could incur substantial costs to engageclean up affected sites. The traditional electric operating companies and the natural gas distribution utilities conduct studies to determine the extent of any required cleanup and Southern Company has recognized the estimated costs to clean up known impacted sites in its financial statements. Amounts for cleanup and ongoing monitoring costs were not material for any business relatedyear presented. The traditional electric operating companies and the natural gas distribution utilities in Illinois and Georgia have all received authority from their respective state PSCs or other applicable state regulatory agencies to recover approved environmental compliance costs through regulatory mechanisms. These regulatory mechanisms are adjusted annually or as necessary within limits approved by the state PSCs or other applicable state regulatory agencies. The traditional electric operating companies and Southern Company Gas may be liable for some or all required cleanup costs for additional sites that may require environmental remediation. See Note 3 to the Kemper Countyfinancial statements under "Environmental Remediation" for additional information.
Global Climate Issues
On August 31, 2018, the EPA published a proposed rule known as the Affordable Clean Energy (ACE) Rule, which is intended to replace a regulation enacted in 2015 known as the Clean Power Plan (CPP), that would limit CO2 emissions from existing fossil fuel-fired electric generating units. The CPP has been stayed by the U.S. Supreme Court since 2016. The ACE Rule would require states to develop GHG unit-specific emission rate standards based on heat-rate efficiency improvements for existing fossil fuel-fired steam units. As proposed, combustion turbines, including natural gas combined cycles, are not affected sources. As of January 1, 2019, the Southern Company system has ownership interests in 40 fossil fuel-fired steam units to which the proposed ACE Rule is applicable. The ultimate impact of this rule to the Southern Company system is currently unknown and will depend on changes between the proposal and the final rule, subsequent state plan developments and requirements, and any associated legal challenges.
On December 20, 2018, the EPA published a proposed review of the Standards of Performance for Greenhouse Gas Emissions from New, Modified, and Reconstructed Stationary Sources: Electric Utility Generating Units final rule (2015 NSPS rule). The EPA's final 2015 NSPS rule set standards of performance for new, modified, and reconstructed electric utility generating units which included stationary combustion turbines and fossil-fired steam boilers. This proposal reduces the stringency of the 2015 NSPS rule by not basing the new and reconstructed fossil-fired steam boiler and IGCC standards on partial carbon capture and sequestration. The impact of any changes to this rule will depend on the content of the final rule and the outcome of any legal challenges.
Additional domestic GHG policies may emerge in the future requiring the United States to transition to a lower GHG emitting economy. The Southern Company system has transitioned from an electric generating mix of 70% coal and 15% natural gas in 2007 to a mix of 30% coal and 46% natural gas in 2018, along with over 8,000 MWs of renewable resources. This transition has been supported in part by the Southern Company system retiring 4,226 MWs of coal- and oil-fired generating capacity since 2010 and converting 3,280 MWs of generating capacity from coal to natural gas since 2015. In addition, Southern Company Gas has replaced approximately 5,600 miles of bare steel and cast-iron pipe, resulting in removal of approximately 2.5 million metric tons of GHG from its natural gas distribution system since 1998. Based on ownership or financial control of facilities, the Southern Company system's 2017 GHG emissions (CO2 equivalent) were approximately 98 million metric tons, with 2018 emissions estimated at 98 million metric tons. This equates to a reduction of 36% between 2007 and 2018. The 2018 estimates include GHG emissions attributable to each of Elizabethtown Gas, Elkton Gas, Florida City Gas, and the Florida Plants through the date of the applicable disposition. See Note 15 to the financial statements for additional information regarding disposition activities.
In April 2018, Southern Company established an intermediate goal of a 50% reduction in carbon emissions from 2007 levels by 2030 and a long-term goal of low- to no-carbon operations by 2050. To achieve these goals, the Southern Company system expects to continue growing its renewable energy facilityportfolio, optimize technology advancements to modernize its transmission and distribution systems, increase the use of natural gas for generation, complete ongoing construction projects, including Georgia Power's interest in Mississippi;Plant Vogtle Units 3 and seek attorney's fees, costs,4, invest in energy efficiency, and interest.continue research and development efforts focused on technologies to lower GHG emissions. The plaintiffsSouthern Company system's ability to achieve these goals also seek an injunctionwill be dependent on many external factors, including supportive national energy policies, low natural gas prices, and the development, deployment, and advancement of relevant energy technologies.

FERC Matters
Open Access Transmission Tariff
On May 10, 2018, AMEA and dismissedCooperative Energy filed with the case. On July 7, 2017,FERC a complaint against SCS and the plaintiffs filed noticetraditional electric operating companies claiming that the current 11.25% base ROE used in calculating the annual transmission revenue requirements of an appeal. Southern Company believes this legal challenge hasthe traditional electric operating companies' open access transmission tariff is unjust and unreasonable as measured by the applicable FERC standards. The complaint requested that the base ROE be set no merit; however, an adverse outcomehigher than 8.65% and that the FERC order refunds for the difference in revenue requirements that results from applying a just and reasonable ROE established in this proceeding could haveupon determining the current ROE is unjust and unreasonable. On June 18, 2018, SCS and the traditional electric operating companies filed their response challenging the adequacy of the showing presented by the complainants and offering support for the current ROE. On September 6, 2018, the FERC issued an order establishing a refund effective date of May 10, 2018 in the event a refund is due and initiating an investigation and settlement procedures regarding the current base ROE. Through December 31, 2018, the estimated maximum potential refund is not expected to be material impact onto Southern Company's results of operations financial condition, and liquidity. Southern Company intends to vigorously defend itself in this matter and theor cash flows. The ultimate outcome of this matter cannot be determined at this time.
On June 9, 2016, Treetop, Greenleaf CO2 Solutions, LLC (Greenleaf), Tenrgys, LLC, Tellus Energy, LLC, WCOA, LLC, and Tellus Operating Group filed a complaint against Mississippi Power, Southern Company Gas
Southern Company Gas' gas pipeline investments business is involved in two significant pipeline construction projects, the Atlantic Coast Pipeline (5% ownership) and SCSthe PennEast Pipeline (20% ownership), which received FERC approval in October 2017 and January 2018, respectively. Southern Company Gas' total capital expenditures, excluding AFUDC, at completion are expected to be between $350 million and $390 million for the Atlantic Coast Pipeline and $276 million for the PennEast Pipeline. These projects, along with Southern Company Gas' existing pipelines, are intended to provide diverse sources of natural gas supplies to customers, resolve current and long-term supply planning for new capacity, enhance system reliability, and generate economic development in the areas served.
Work continues with state courtand federal agencies to obtain the required permits to begin construction on the PennEast Pipeline. Any material delays may impact forecasted capital expenditures and the expected in-service date.
The Atlantic Coast Pipeline has experienced challenges to its permits since construction began in Gwinnett County, Georgia.2018. During the third and fourth quarters 2018, a FERC stop work order, together with delays in obtaining permits necessary for construction and construction delays due to judicial actions, impacted the cost and schedule for the project. As a result, total project cost estimates have increased from between $6.0 billion and $6.5 billion to between $7.0 billion and $7.8 billion, excluding financing costs. Southern Company Gas' share of the total project costs is 5% and Southern Company Gas' investment at December 31, 2018 totaled $83 million. The complaint relatedoperator of the joint venture currently expects to achieve a late 2020 in-service date for at least key segments of the Atlantic Coast Pipeline, while the remainder may extend into early 2021. Southern Company Gas has evaluated the recoverability of its investment and determined there was no impairment as of December 31, 2018. Abnormal weather, work delays (including due to judicial or regulatory action), and other conditions may result in additional cost or schedule modifications, which could result in an impairment of Southern Company Gas' investment and could have a material impact on Southern Company's financial statements.
The ultimate outcome of these matters cannot be determined at this time. See Notes 7 and 9 to the cancelled COfinancial statements under "2 contract with Treetop and alleged fraudulent misrepresentation, fraudulent concealment, civil conspiracy, and breach of contract on the part of Mississippi Power, Southern Company and SCS and sought compensatory damages of $100 million, as well as unspecified punitive damages. Southern Company, Mississippi Power, and SCS moved to compel arbitration pursuant to the terms of the CO2Gas contract, which the court grantedEquity Method Investments" and "Guarantees," respectively, for additional information on May 4, 2017. On June 28, 2017, Treetop, Greenleaf, Tenrgys, LLC, Tellus Energy, LLC, WCOA, LLC, and Tellus Operating Group filed a claim for arbitration requesting $500 million in damages. On December 28, 2017, Mississippi Power reached a settlement agreement with Treetop, Greenleaf, Tenrgys, LLC, Tellus Energy, LLC, WCOA, LLC, and Tellus Operating Group and the arbitration was dismissed.these pipeline projects.
Nuclear ConstructionRegulatory Matters
Project StatusAlabama Power
In 2009,Alabama Power's revenues from regulated retail operations are collected through various rate mechanisms subject to the Georgia PSC certified construction of Plant Vogtle Units 3 and 4. In 2012, the NRC issued the related combined construction and operating licenses, which allowed full constructionoversight of the two AP1000 nuclear units (with electric generating capacity of approximately 1,100 MWs each)Alabama PSC. Alabama Power currently recovers its costs from the regulated retail business primarily through Rate RSE, Rate CNP, Rate ECR, and related facilitiesRate NDR. In addition, the Alabama PSC issues accounting orders to begin. Until March 2017, constructionaddress current events impacting Alabama Power. See Note 2 to the financial statements under "Alabama Power" for additional information regarding Alabama Power's rate mechanisms and accounting orders.
Rate RSE
The Alabama PSC has adopted Rate RSE that provides for periodic annual adjustments based upon Alabama Power's projected weighted common equity return (WCER) compared to an allowable range. Rate RSE adjustments are based on Plant Vogtle Units 3forward-looking information for the applicable upcoming calendar year. Rate RSE adjustments for any two-year period, when averaged together, cannot exceed 4.0% and 4 continuedany annual adjustment is limited to 5.0%. When the projected WCER is under the Vogtle 3 and 4 Agreement, which was a substantially fixed price agreement. On March 29, 2017, the EPC Contractor filed for bankruptcy protection under Chapter 11 of the U.S. Bankruptcy Code.
In connection with the EPC Contractor's bankruptcy filing, Georgia Power, acting for itself and as agent for the Vogtle Owners, entered into the Interim Assessment Agreement with the EPC Contractor to allow construction to continue. The Interim Assessment Agreement expired on July 27, 2017 when the Vogtle Services Agreement became effective. In August 2017, following completion of comprehensive cost to complete and cancellation cost assessments, Georgia Power filed its seventeenth VCM report with the Georgia PSC, which included a recommendation to continue construction of Plant Vogtle Units 3 and 4, with Southern Nuclear serving as project manager and Bechtel serving as the primary construction contractor. On December 21, 2017, the Georgia PSC approved Georgia Power's recommendation to continue construction.
Georgia Power expects Plant Vogtle Units 3 and 4 to be placed in service by November 2021 and November 2022, respectively. Georgia Power's revised capital cost forecast for its 45.7% proportionate share of Plant Vogtle Units 3 and 4allowed range, there is $8.8 billion ($7.3 billion after reflecting the impact of payments received under the Guarantee Settlement Agreement and the Customer Refunds, each as defined herein). Georgia Power's CWIP balance for Plant Vogtle Units 3 and 4 was $3.3 billion at December 31, 2017, which is net of the Guarantee Settlement Agreement payments less the Customer Refunds. Georgia Power estimates that its financing costs for construction of Plant Vogtle Units 3 and 4 will total approximately $3.1 billion, of which $1.6 billion had been incurred through December 31, 2017.
Vogtle 3 and 4 Agreement and EPC Contractor Bankruptcy
In 2008, Georgia Power, acting for itself and as agent for the Vogtle Owners, entered into the Vogtle 3 and 4 Agreement. Under the terms of the Vogtle 3 and 4 Agreement, the Vogtle Owners agreed to pay a purchase price subject to certain price escalations and adjustments, including fixed escalation amounts and index-based adjustments, as well as adjustments for change orders, and performance bonuses for early completion and unit performance. Under the Toshiba Guarantee, Toshiba guaranteed certain payment obligations of the EPC Contractor, including any liability of the EPC Contractor for abandonment of work. In the first quarter 2016, Westinghouse delivered to the Vogtle Owners a total of $920 million of letters of credit from financial institutions (Westinghouse Letters of Credit) to secure a portion of the EPC Contractor's potential obligations under the Vogtle 3 and 4 Agreement.
Subsequent to the EPC Contractor bankruptcy filing, a number of subcontractors to the EPC Contractor alleged non-payment by the EPC Contractor for amounts owed for work performed on Plant Vogtle Units 3 and 4. Georgia Power, acting for itself and as agent for the Vogtle Owners, has taken actions to remove liens filed by these subcontractors through the posting of surety bonds.
    Table of Contents                                Index to Financial Statements

NOTESMANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS (continued)
Southern Company and Subsidiary Companies 20172018 Annual Report


Relatedan adjusting point of 5.98% and eligibility for a performance-based adder of seven basis points, or 0.07%, to such liens, certain subcontractors have filed,the WCER adjusting point if Alabama Power (i) has an "A" credit rating equivalent with at least one of the recognized rating agencies or (ii) is in the top one-third of a designated customer value benchmark survey. If Alabama Power's actual retail return is above the allowed WCER range, the excess will be refunded to customers unless otherwise directed by the Alabama PSC; however, there is no provision for additional customer billings should the actual retail return fall below the WCER range. Prior to January 2019, retail rates remained unchanged when the WCER range was between 5.75% and additional subcontractors may file, actions against6.21%.
On May 1, 2018, the EPC Contractor and the Vogtle OwnersAlabama PSC approved modifications to preserve their payment rights with respect to such claims. All amounts associated with the removal of subcontractor liensRate RSE and other EPC Contractor pre-petition accounts payable have been paid or accrued ascommitments designed to position Alabama Power to address the growing pressure on its credit quality resulting from the Tax Reform Legislation, without increasing retail rates under Rate RSE in the near term. Alabama Power plans to reduce growth in total debt by increasing equity, with corresponding reductions in debt issuances, thereby de-leveraging its capital structure. Alabama Power's goal is to achieve an equity ratio of approximately 55% by the end of 2025. At December 31, 2017.2018, Alabama Power's equity ratio was approximately 47%.
On June 9, 2017, Georgia PowerThe approved modifications to Rate RSE began for billings in January 2019. The modifications include reducing the top of the allowed WCER range from 6.21% to 6.15% and the other Vogtle Owners and Toshiba entered into a settlement agreement regarding the Toshiba Guarantee (Guarantee Settlement Agreement). Pursuantmodifications to the Guarantee Settlement Agreement, Toshiba acknowledged the amount of its obligation was $3.68 billion (Guarantee Obligations), of which Georgia Power's proportionate share was approximately $1.7 billion.refund mechanism applicable to prior year actual results. The Guarantee Settlement Agreement provided for a schedule of payments for the Guarantee Obligations beginning in October 2017 and continuing through January 2021. Toshiba made the first three payments as scheduled. On December 8, 2017, Georgia Power, the other Vogtle Owners, certain affiliates of the Municipal Electric Authority of Georgia (MEAG Power), and Toshiba entered into Amendment No. 1modifications to the Guarantee Settlement Agreement (Guarantee Settlement Agreement Amendment). The Guarantee Settlement Agreement Amendment provided that Toshiba's remaining payment obligations under the Guarantee Settlement Agreement were due and payable in full on December 15, 2017, which Toshiba satisfied on December 14, 2017. Pursuantrefund mechanism allow Alabama Power to the Guarantee Settlement Agreement Amendment, Toshiba was deemed to be the owner of certain pre-petition bankruptcy claims of Georgia Power, the other Vogtle Owners, and certain affiliates of MEAG Power against Westinghouse, and Georgia Power and the other Vogtle Owners surrendered the Westinghouse Letters of Credit.
Additionally, on June 9, 2017, Georgia Power, acting for itself and as agent for the other Vogtle Owners, and the EPC Contractor entered into the Vogtle Services Agreement, which was amended and restated on July 20, 2017. On July 20, 2017, the bankruptcy court approved the EPC Contractor's motion seeking authorization to (i) enter into the Vogtle Services Agreement, (ii) assume and assign to the Vogtle Owners certain project-related contracts, (iii) join the Vogtle Owners as counterparties to certain assumed project-related contracts, and (iv) reject the Vogtle 3 and 4 Agreement. The Vogtle Services Agreement, and the EPC Contractor's rejection of the Vogtle 3 and 4 Agreement, became effective upon approval by the DOE on July 27, 2017. The Vogtle Services Agreement will continue until the start-up and testing of Plant Vogtle Units 3 and 4 are complete and electricity is generated and sold from both units. The Vogtle Services Agreement is terminable by the Vogtle Owners upon 30 days' written notice.
Effective October 23, 2017, Georgia Power, acting for itself and as agent for the other Vogtle Owners, entered intoretain a construction completion agreement with Bechtel, whereby Bechtel will serve as the primary contractor for the remaining construction activities for Plant Vogtle Units 3 and 4 (Bechtel Agreement). Facility design and engineering remains the responsibility of the EPC Contractor under the Vogtle Services Agreement. The Bechtel Agreement is a cost reimbursable plus fee arrangement, whereby Bechtel will be reimbursed for actual costs plus a base fee and an at-risk fee, which is subject to adjustment based on Bechtel's performance against cost and schedule targets. Each Vogtle Owner is severally (not jointly) liable for its proportionate share, based on its ownership interest, of all amounts owed to Bechtel under the Bechtel Agreement. The Vogtle Owners may terminate the Bechtel Agreement at any time for their convenience, provided that the Vogtle Owners will be required to pay amounts related to work performed prior to the termination (including the applicable portion of the base fee)revenue that causes the actual WCER for a given year to exceed the allowed range.
Generally, if Alabama Power's actual WCER is between 6.15% and 7.65%, certain termination-related costs, and, at certain stagescustomers will receive 25% of the work, the applicable portionamount between 6.15% and 6.65%, 40% of the at-risk fee. Bechtel may terminate the Bechtel Agreement under certain circumstances, including certain Vogtle Owner suspensions of work, certain breachesamount between 6.65% and 7.15%, and 75% of the Bechtel Agreement by the Vogtle Owners, Vogtle Owner insolvency,amount between 7.15% and certain other events. Pursuant7.65%. Customers will receive all amounts in excess of an actual WCER of 7.65%.
In conjunction with these modifications to the Loan Guarantee Agreement between GeorgiaRate RSE, on May 8, 2018, Alabama Power consented to a moratorium on any upward adjustments under Rate RSE for 2019 and the DOE, Georgia Power is required2020 and will also return $50 million to obtain the DOE's approval of the Bechtel Agreement prior to obtaining any further advances under the Loan Guarantee Agreement.customers through bill credits in 2019.
On November 2, 2017,30, 2018, Alabama Power made its required annual Rate RSE submission to the Vogtle Owners entered intoAlabama PSC of projected data for calendar year 2019. Projected earnings were within the specified range; therefore, retail rates under Rate RSE remain unchanged for 2019.
At December 31, 2018, Alabama Power's retail return exceeded the allowed WCER range, which resulted in Alabama Power establishing a regulatory liability of $109 million for Rate RSE refunds. In accordance with an amendmentAlabama PSC order issued on February 5, 2019, Alabama Power will apply $75 million to their joint ownership agreements for Plant Vogtle Units 3reduce the Rate ECR under recovered balance and 4 (as amended, Vogtle Joint Ownership Agreements)the remaining $34 million will be refunded to customers through bill credits in July through September 2019.
Rate CNP PPA
Alabama Power's retail rates, approved by the Alabama PSC, provide for among other conditions, additional Vogtle Owner approval requirements. Pursuantadjustments under Rate CNP to recognize the Vogtle Joint Ownership Agreements,placing of new generating facilities into retail service. Alabama Power may also recover retail costs associated with certificated PPAs under Rate CNP PPA. No adjustments to Rate CNP PPA occurred during the holders of at least 90%period 2016 through 2018 and no adjustment is expected in 2019.
In accordance with an accounting order issued in February 2017 by the Alabama PSC, Alabama Power reclassified $69 million of the ownership interests in Plant Vogtle Units 3December 31, 2016 Rate CNP PPA under recovered balance to a separate regulatory asset. The amortization of the new regulatory asset through Rate RSE will begin concurrently with the effective date of Alabama Power's next depreciation study, which is expected to occur no later than 2022.
Rate CNP Compliance
Rate CNP Compliance allows for the recovery of Alabama Power's retail costs associated with laws, regulations, and 4 must voteother such mandates directed at the utility industry involving the environment, security, reliability, safety, sustainability, or similar considerations impacting Alabama Power's facilities or operations. Rate CNP Compliance is based on forward-looking information and provides for the recovery of these costs pursuant to continue construction if certain adverse events occur, including (i) the bankruptcy of Toshiba; (ii) termination or rejection in bankruptcy of certain agreements, including the Vogtle Services Agreement or the Bechtel Agreement; (iii) the Georgia PSC or Georgia Power determinesa factor that any of Georgia Power'sis calculated annually. Compliance costs relating to the construction of Plant Vogtle Units 3 and 4 will not be recovered include operations and maintenance expenses, depreciation, and a return on certain invested capital. Revenues for Rate CNP Compliance, as recorded on the financial statements, are adjusted for differences in retail rates because suchactual recoverable costs are deemed unreasonable or imprudent; or (iv) an increaseand amounts billed in current regulated rates. Accordingly, changes in the construction budget containedbilling factor will have no significant effect on revenues or net income, but will affect annual cash flow. Changes in Rate CNP Compliance-related operations and maintenance expenses and depreciation generally will have no effect on net income.
In accordance with an accounting order issued in February 2017 by the seventeenth VCM reportAlabama PSC, Alabama Power reclassified $36 million of more than $1 billion or extensionits under recovered balance in Rate CNP Compliance to a separate regulatory asset. The amortization of the project schedule contained in the seventeenth VCM report of more than one year. In addition, pursuant to the Vogtle Joint Ownership Agreements, the required approval of holders of ownership interests in Plant Vogtle Units 3 and 4 is at least (i) 90% for a change of the primary construction contractor and (ii) 67% for material amendments to the Vogtle Services Agreement or agreements with Southern Nuclear or the primary construction contractor, including the Bechtel Agreement. The Vogtle Joint Ownership Agreements also confirm that the Vogtle Owners' sole recourse against Georgia Power or Southern Nuclear for any action or inaction in connection with their performance as agent for the Vogtle Owners is limited to removal of Georgia Power and/or Southern Nuclear as agent, except in cases of willful misconduct.new regulatory asset
    Table of Contents                                Index to Financial Statements

NOTESMANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS (continued)
Southern Company and Subsidiary Companies 20172018 Annual Report


through Rate RSE will begin concurrently with the effective date of Alabama Power's next depreciation study, which is expected to occur no later than 2022.
On November 30, 2018, Alabama Power submitted calculations associated with its cost of complying with environmental mandates, as provided under Rate CNP Compliance. The filing reflected a projected unrecovered retail revenue requirement for environmental compliance of approximately $205 million, which is being recovered in the billing months of January 2019 through December 2019.
Tax Reform Accounting Order
On May 1, 2018, the Alabama PSC approved an accounting order that authorized Alabama Power to defer the benefits of federal excess deferred income taxes associated with the Tax Reform Legislation for the year ended December 31, 2018 as a regulatory liability and to use up to $30 million of such deferrals to offset under recovered amounts under Rate ECR. The estimated deferrals for the year ended December 31, 2018 totaled approximately $63 million, subject to adjustment following the filing of the 2018 tax return, of which $30 million was used to offset the Rate ECR under recovered balance and $33 million is recorded in other regulatory liabilities, deferred on the balance sheet to be used for the benefit of customers as determined by the Alabama PSC at a future date. See Note 10 to the financial statements under "Current and Deferred Income Taxes" for additional information.
Environmental Accounting Order
Based on an order from the Alabama PSC (Environmental Accounting Order), Alabama Power is allowed to establish a regulatory asset to record the unrecovered investment costs, including the unrecovered plant asset balance and the unrecovered costs associated with site removal and closure associated with future unit retirements caused by environmental regulations. The regulatory asset is being amortized and recovered over the affected unit's remaining useful life, as established prior to the decision regarding early retirement through Rate CNP Compliance. At December 31, 2018, this regulatory asset had a balance of $42 million. See "Environmental MattersEnvironmental Laws and Regulations" herein for additional information regarding environmental regulations.
Subsequent to December 31, 2018, Alabama Power determined that Plant Gorgas Units 8, 9, and 10 (approximately 1,000 MWs) will be retired by April 15, 2019 due to the expected costs of compliance with federal and state environmental regulations. In accordance with the Environmental Accounting Order, approximately $740 million of net investment costs will be transferred to a regulatory asset at the retirement date and recovered over the affected units' remaining useful lives, as established prior to the decision to retire.
Georgia Power
Georgia Power's revenues from regulated retail operations are collected through various rate mechanisms subject to the oversight of the Georgia PSC. Georgia Power currently recovers its costs from the regulated retail business through the 2013 ARP, which includes traditional base tariff rates, Demand-Side Management (DSM) tariffs, Environmental Compliance Cost Recovery (ECCR) tariffs, and Municipal Franchise Fee (MFF) tariffs. Georgia Power is scheduled to file a base rate case by July 1, 2019, which may continue or modify these tariffs. In addition, financing costs on certified construction costs of Plant Vogtle Units 3 and 4 are being collected through the NCCR tariff and fuel costs are collected through a separate fuel cost recovery tariff. See Note 2 to the financial statements under "Georgia Power" for additional information.
Rate Plans
Pursuant to the terms and conditions of a settlement agreement related to Southern Company's acquisition of Southern Company Gas approved by the Georgia PSC in 2016, the 2013 ARP will continue in effect until December 31, 2019, and Georgia Power will be required to file its next base rate case by July 1, 2019. Furthermore, through December 31, 2019, Georgia Power will retain its merger savings, net of transition costs, as defined in the settlement agreement; through December 31, 2022, such net merger savings will be shared on a 60/40 basis with customers; thereafter, all merger savings will be retained by customers. See Note 15 to the financial statements under "Southern Company Merger with Southern Company Gas" for additional information regarding the Merger.
There were no changes to Georgia Power's traditional base tariff rates, ECCR tariff, DSM tariffs, or MFF tariff in 2017 or 2018.
Under the 2013 ARP, Georgia Power's retail ROE is set at 10.95% and earnings are evaluated against a retail ROE range of 10.00% to 12.00%. Two-thirds of any earnings above 12.00% will be directly refunded to customers, with the remaining one-third retained by Georgia Power. There will be no recovery of any earnings shortfall below 10.00% on an actual basis. In 2016, Georgia Power's retail ROE exceeded 12.00%, and Georgia Power refunded to retail customers in 2018 approximately $40 million as approved by the Georgia PSC. On February 5, 2019, the Georgia PSC approved a settlement between Georgia Power and the staff

MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS (continued)
Southern Company and Subsidiary Companies 2018 Annual Report


of the Georgia PSC under which Georgia Power's retail ROE for 2017 was stipulated to exceed 12.00% and Georgia Power will reduce certain regulatory assets by approximately $4 million in lieu of providing refunds to retail customers. In 2018, Georgia Power's retail ROE exceeded 12.00%, and Georgia Power accrued approximately $100 million to refund to retail customers, subject to review and approval by the Georgia PSC.
On April 3, 2018, the Georgia PSC approved the Georgia Power Tax Reform Settlement Agreement. Pursuant to the Georgia Power Tax Reform Settlement Agreement, to reflect the federal income tax rate reduction impact of the Tax Reform Legislation, Georgia Power will refund to customers a total of $330 million through bill credits. Georgia Power issued bill credits of approximately $130 million in 2018 and will issue bill credits of approximately $95 million in June 2019 and $105 million in February 2020. In addition, Georgia Power is deferring as a regulatory liability (i) the revenue equivalent of the tax expense reduction resulting from legislation lowering the Georgia state income tax rate from 6.00% to 5.75% in 2019 and (ii) the entire benefit of federal and state excess accumulated deferred income taxes, which is expected to total approximately $700 million at December 31, 2019. At December 31, 2018, the related regulatory liability balance totaled $610 million. The amortization of these regulatory liabilities is expected to be addressed in the Georgia Power 2019 Base Rate Case. If there is not a base rate case in 2019, customers will receive $185 million in annual bill credits beginning in 2020, with any additional federal and state income tax savings deferred as a regulatory liability, until Georgia Power's next base rate case.
To address some of the negative cash flow and credit quality impacts of the Tax Reform Legislation, the Georgia PSC also approved an increase in Georgia Power's retail equity ratio to the lower of (i) Georgia Power's actual common equity weight in its capital structure or (ii) 55%, until the Georgia Power 2019 Base Rate Case. At December 31, 2018, Georgia Power's actual retail common equity ratio (on a 13-month average basis) was approximately 55%. Benefits from reduced federal income tax rates in excess of the amounts refunded to customers will be retained by Georgia Power to cover the carrying costs of the incremental equity in 2018 and 2019.
Regulatory Matters
In 2009, the Georgia PSC voted to certify construction of Plant Vogtle Units 3 and 4 with a certified capital cost of $4.418 billion. In addition, in 2009 the Georgia PSC approved inclusion of the Plant Vogtle Units 3 and 4 related CWIP accounts in rate base, and the State of Georgia enacted the Georgia Nuclear Energy Financing Act, which allows Georgia Power to recover financing costs for nuclear construction projects certified by the Georgia PSC. Financing costs are recovered on all applicable certified costs through annual adjustments to the NCCR tariff up to the certified capital cost of $4.418 billion. As of December 31, 2017, Georgia Power had recovered approximately $1.6 billion of financing costs. On January 30, 2018, Georgia Power filed to decrease the NCCR tariff by approximately $50 million, effective April 1, 2018, pending Georgia PSC approval. The decrease reflects the payments received under the Guarantee Settlement Agreement, refunds to customers ordered by the Georgia PSC aggregating approximately $188 million (Customer Refunds), and the estimated effects of Tax Reform Legislation. The Customer Refunds were recognized as a regulatory liability as of December 31, 2017 and will be paid in three installments of $25 to each retail customer no later than the third quarter 2018.
Georgia Power is required to file semi-annual VCM reports with the Georgia PSC by February 28 and August 31 each year. In October 2013, in connection with the eighth VCM report, the Georgia PSC approved a stipulation (2013 Stipulation) between Georgia Power and the staff of the Georgia PSC to waive the requirement to amend the Plant Vogtle Units 3 and 4 certificate in accordance with the 2009 certification order until the completion of Plant Vogtle Unit 3, or earlier if deemed appropriate by the Georgia PSC and Georgia Power.
On December 20, 2016, the Georgia PSC voted to approve a settlement agreement (Vogtle Cost Settlement Agreement) resolving certain prudency matters in connection with the fifteenth VCM report. On December 21, 2017, the Georgia PSC voted to approve (and issued its related order on January 11, 2018) certain recommendations made by Georgia Power in the seventeenth VCM reportPower's recommendation to continue construction and modifying the Vogtle Cost Settlement Agreement. The Vogtle Cost Settlement Agreement, as modified by the January 11, 2018 order, resolved the following regulatory matters related to Plant Vogtle Units 3 and 4: (i) none of the $3.3 billion of costs incurred through December 31, 2015 and reflected in the fourteenth VCM report should be disallowed from rate base on the basis of imprudence; (ii) the Contractor Settlement Agreement was reasonable and prudent and none of the amounts paid pursuant to the Contractor Settlement Agreement should be disallowed from rate base on the basis of imprudence; (iii) (a) capital costs incurred up to $5.680$5.68 billion would be presumed to be reasonable and prudent with the burden of proof on any party challenging such costs, (b) Georgia Power would have the burden to show that any capital costs above $5.680$5.68 billion were prudent, and (c) a revised capital cost forecast of $7.3 billion (after reflecting the impact of payments received under the Guarantee Settlement Agreement and related Customer Refunds) iswas found reasonable; (iv) construction of Plant Vogtle Units 3 and 4 should be completed, with Southern Nuclear serving as project manager and Bechtel as primary contractor; (v) approved and deemed reasonable Georgia Power's revised schedule placing Plant Vogtle Units 3 and 4 in service in November 2021 and November 2022, respectively; (vi) confirmed that the revised cost forecast does not represent a cost cap and that prudence decisions on cost recovery will be made at a later date, consistent with applicable Georgia law; (vii) reduced the ROE used to calculate the NCCR tariff (a) from 10.95% (the ROE rate setting point authorized by the Georgia PSC in the 2013 ARP) to 10.00% effective January 1, 2016, (b) from 10.00% to 8.30%, effective January 1, 2020, and (c) from 8.30% to 5.30%, effective January 1, 2021 (provided that the ROE in no case will be less than Georgia Power's average cost of long-term debt); (viii) reduced the ROE used for AFUDC equity for Plant Vogtle Units 3 and 4 from 10.00% to Georgia Power's average cost of long-term debt, effective January 1, 2018; and (ix) agreed that upon Unit 3 reaching commercial operation, retail base rates would be adjusted to include carrying costs on those capital costs deemed prudent in the Vogtle Cost Settlement Agreement. The January 11, 2018 order also stated that if Plant Vogtle Units 3 and 4 are not commercially operational by June 1, 2021 and June 1, 2022, respectively, the ROE used to calculate the NCCR tariff will be further reduced by 10 basis points each month (but not lower than Georgia Power's average cost of long-term debt) until the respective unitUnit is commercially operational. The ROE reductions negatively impacted earnings by approximately $100 million, $25 million, and $20 million in 2018, 2017, and 2016, and $25 million in 2017respectively, and are estimated to have negative earnings impacts of approximately $120$75 million in 20182019 and an aggregate of $585approximately $615 million from 20192020 to 2022.

I-30


In its January 11, 2018 order, the Georgia PSC also stated if other certain conditions change and assumptions upon which Georgia Power's seventeenth VCM report are based do not materialize, both Georgia Power and the Georgia PSC reservereserved the right to reconsider the decision to continue construction.
On February 12, 2018, Georgia Interfaith Power & Light, Inc. (GIPL) and Partnership for Southern Equity, Inc. (PSE) filed a petition appealing the Georgia PSC's January 11, 2018 order with the Fulton County Superior Court. On March 8, 2018, Georgia Watch filed a similar appeal to the Fulton County Superior Court for judicial review of the Georgia PSC's decision and denial of Georgia Watch's motion for reconsideration. On December 21, 2018, the Fulton County Superior Court granted Georgia Power's motion to dismiss the two appeals. On January 9, 2019, GIPL, PSE, and Georgia Watch filed an appeal of this decision with the Georgia Court of Appeals. Georgia Power believes the appeal has no merit; however, an adverse outcome in thisthe appeal combined with subsequent adverse action by the Georgia PSC could have a material impact on Southern Company's and Georgia Power's results of operations, financial condition, and liquidity.
The IRS allocated PTCsIn preparation for its nineteenth VCM filing, Georgia Power requested Southern Nuclear to eachperform a full cost reforecast for the project. This reforecast, performed prior to the nineteenth VCM filing, resulted in a $0.7 billion increase to the base capital cost forecast reported in the second quarter 2018. This base cost increase primarily resulted from changed assumptions related to the finalization of contract scopes and management responsibilities for Bechtel and over 60 subcontractors, labor productivity rates, and craft labor incentives, as well as the related levels of project management, oversight, and support, including field supervision and engineering support.
Although Georgia Power believes these incremental costs are reasonable and necessary to complete the project and the Georgia PSC's order in the seventeenth VCM proceeding specifically states that the construction of Plant Vogtle Units 3 and 4 which originally requiredis not subject to a cost cap, Georgia Power did not seek rate recovery for these cost increases included in the applicable unit to be placedcurrent base capital cost forecast (or any related financing costs) in service before 2021. Under the Bipartisan Budget Act of 2018, Plant Vogtle Units 3 and 4 continue to qualify for PTCs. The nominal value ofnineteenth VCM report. In connection with future VCM filings, Georgia Power's portion of the PTCs is approximately $500 million per unit.

NOTES (continued)
Southern Company and Subsidiary Companies 2017 Annual Report

In its January 11, 2018 order,Power may request the Georgia PSC also approved $542 millionto evaluate costs currently included in the construction contingency estimate for rate recovery as and when they are appropriately included in the base capital cost forecast. After considering the significant level of capitaluncertainty that exists regarding the future recoverability of costs incurred duringincluded in the seventeenth VCM reporting period (January 1, 2017construction contingency estimate since the ultimate outcome of these matters is subject to June 30, 2017). Thethe outcome of future assessments by management, as well as Georgia PSC has approved seventeen VCM reports covering the periods through June 30, 2017, including total construction capital costs incurred through that date of $4.4 billion.decisions in these future regulatory proceedings, Georgia Power expectsrecorded a total pre-tax charge to file its eighteenth VCM report on February 28,income of $1.1 billion ($0.8 billion after tax) in the second quarter 2018, requesting approval of approximately $450 million ofwhich includes the total increase in the base capital cost forecast and construction capital costs (before payments received under the Guarantee Settlement Agreement and the Customer Refunds) incurred from July 1, 2017 through December 31, 2017. Georgia Power's CWIP balance for Plant Vogtle Units 3 and 4 was approximately $4.8 billion as of December 31, 2017, or $3.3 billion net of payments received under the Guarantee Settlement Agreement and the Customer Refunds.contingency estimate.
The ultimate outcome of these matters cannot be determined at this time.
See Note 2 to the financial statements under "Georgia Power – Nuclear Construction" in Item 8 herein for additional information regarding Plant Vogtle Units 3 and 4.
Southern Company Gas' significant investments in pipelines and pipeline development projects involve financial and execution risks.
Southern Company Gas has made significant investments in existing pipelines and pipeline development projects. Many of the existing pipelines are, and when completed many of the pipeline development projects will be, operated by third parties. If one of these agents fails to perform in a proper manner, the value of the investment could decline and Southern Company Gas could lose part or all of its investment. In addition, from time to time, Southern Company Gas may be required to contribute additional capital to a pipeline joint venture or guarantee the obligations of such joint venture.
With respect to certain pipeline development projects, Southern Company Gas will rely on its joint venture partners for construction management and will not exercise direct control over the process. All of the pipeline development projects are dependent on contractors for the successful and timely completion of the projects. Further, the development of pipeline projects involves numerous regulatory, environmental, construction, safety, political, and legal uncertainties and may require the expenditure of significant amounts of capital. These projects may not be completed on schedule, at the budgeted cost, or at all. There may be cost overruns and construction difficulties that cause Southern Company Gas' capital expenditures to exceed its initial expectations. Moreover, Southern Company Gas' income will not increase immediately upon the expenditure of funds on a pipeline project. Pipeline construction occurs over an extended period of time and Southern Company Gas will not receive material increases in income until the project is placed in service.
Work continues with state and federal agencies to obtain the required permits to begin construction on the PennEast Pipeline. Any material delays may impact forecasted capital expenditures and the expected in-service date.
The Atlantic Coast Pipeline has experienced challenges to its permits since construction began in 2018. During the third and fourth quarters 2018, a FERC stop work order, together with delays in obtaining permits necessary for construction and construction delays due to judicial actions, impacted the cost and schedule for the project. As a result, total project cost estimates have increased and the operator of the joint venture currently expects to achieve a late 2020 in-service date for at least

I-31


key segments of the Atlantic Coast Pipeline, while the remainder may extend into early 2021. Abnormal weather, work delays (including due to judicial or regulatory action), and other conditions may result in additional cost or schedule modifications, which could result in an impairment of Southern Company Gas' investment and could have a material impact on Southern Company's and Southern Company Gas' financial statements.
The ultimate outcome of these matters cannot be determined at this time and the occurrence of these or any other of the foregoing events could adversely affect the results of operations, cash flows, and financial condition of Southern Company Gas and Southern Company.
FINANCIAL, ECONOMIC, AND MARKET RISKS
The electric generation and energy marketing operations of the traditional electric operating companies and Southern Power and the natural gas operations of Southern Company Gas are subject to risks, many of which are beyondtheir control, including changes in energy prices and fuel costs, which may reduce revenues and increase costs.
The generation, energy marketing, and natural gas operations of the Southern Company system are subject to changes in energy prices and fuel costs, which could increase the cost of producing power, decrease the amount received from the sale of energy, and/or make electric generating facilities less competitive. The market prices for these commodities may fluctuate significantly over relatively short periods of time. Among the factors that could influence energy prices and fuel costs are:
prevailing market prices for coal, natural gas, uranium, fuel oil, biomass, and other fuels, as applicable, used in the generation facilities of the traditional electric operating companies and Southern Power and, in the case of natural gas, distributed by Southern Company Gas, including associated transportation costs, and supplies of such commodities;
demand for energy and the extent of additional supplies of energy available from current or new competitors;
liquidity in the general wholesale electricity and natural gas markets;
weather conditions impacting demand for electricity and natural gas;
seasonality;
transmission or transportation constraints, disruptions, or inefficiencies;
availability of competitively priced alternative energy sources;
forced or unscheduled plant outages for the Southern Company system, its competitors, or third party providers;
the financial condition of market participants;
the economy in the Southern Company system's service territory, the nation, and worldwide, including the impact of economic conditions on demand for electricity and the demand for fuels, including natural gas;
natural disasters, wars, embargos, physical or cyber attacks, and other catastrophic events; and
federal, state, and foreign energy and environmental regulation and legislation.
These factors could increase the expenses and/or reduce the revenues of the registrants. For the traditional electric operating companies and Southern Company Gas' regulated gas distribution operations, such impacts may not be fully recoverable through rates.
Historically, the traditional electric operating companies and Southern Company Gas from time to time have experienced underrecovered fuel and/or purchased gas cost balances and may experience such balances in the future. While the traditional electric operating companies and Southern Company Gas are generally authorized to recover fuel and/or purchased gas costs through cost recovery clauses, recovery may be denied if costs are deemed to be imprudently incurred, and delays in the authorization of such recovery, both of which could negatively impact the cash flows of the affected traditional electric operating company or Southern Company Gas and of Southern Company.
The registrants are subject to risks associated with a changing economic environment, customer behaviors, including increased energy conservation, and adoption patterns of technologies by the customers of the Subsidiary Registrants.
The consumption and use of energy are fundamentally linked to economic activity. This relationship is affected over time by changes in the economy, customer behaviors, and technologies. Any economic downturn could negatively impact customer growth and usage per customer, thus reducing the sales of energy and revenues. Additionally, any economic downturn or disruption of financial markets, both nationally and internationally, could negatively affect the financial stability of customers and counterparties of the Subsidiary Registrants.
Outside of economic disruptions, changes in customer behaviors in response to energy efficiency programs, changing conditions and preferences, or changes in the adoption of technologies could affect the relationship of economic activity to the consumption of energy.
Both federal and state programs exist to influence how customers use energy, and several of the traditional electric operating companies and Southern Company Gas have PSC or other applicable state regulatory agency mandates to promote energy efficiency. Conservation programs could impact the financial results of the registrants in different ways. For example, if any traditional electric operating company or Southern Company Gas is required to invest in conservation measures that result in

I-32


reduced sales from effective conservation, regulatory lag in adjusting rates for the impact of these measures could have a negative financial impact on such traditional electric operating company or Southern Company Gas and Southern Company. Customers could also voluntarily reduce their consumption of energy in response to decreases in their disposable income, increases in energy prices, or individual conservation efforts.
In addition, the adoption of technology by customers can have both positive and negative impacts on sales. Many new technologies utilize less energy than in the past. However, electric and natural gas technologies such as electric and natural gas vehicles can create additional demand. The Southern Company system uses best available methods and experience to incorporate the effects of changes in customer behavior, state and federal programs, PSC or other applicable state regulatory agency mandates, and technology, but the Southern Company system's planning processes may not appropriately estimate and incorporate these effects.
All of the factors discussed above could adversely affect a registrant's results of operations, financial condition, and liquidity.
The operating results of the registrants are affected by weather conditions and may fluctuate on a seasonal andquarterly basis. In addition, catastrophic events, such as fires, earthquakes, hurricanes, tornadoes, floods, droughts, and storms, could result in substantial damage to or limit the operation of the properties of a Subsidiary Registrant and could negatively impact results of operation, financial condition, and liquidity.
Electric power and natural gas supply are generally seasonal businesses. In many parts of the country, demand for power peaks during the summer months, with market prices also peaking at that time. In other areas, power demand peaks during the winter months. While the electric power sales of some of the traditional electric operating companies peak in the summer, others peak in the winter. In the aggregate, electric power sales peak during the summer with a smaller peak during the winter. Additionally, Southern Power has variability in its revenues from renewable generation facilities due to seasonal weather patterns primarily from wind and sun. In most of the areas Southern Company Gas serves, natural gas demand peaks during the winter. As a result, the overall operating results of the registrants may fluctuate substantially on a seasonal basis. In addition, the Subsidiary Registrants have historically sold less power and natural gas when weather conditions are milder. Unusually mild weather in the future could reduce the revenues, net income, and available cash of the affected registrant.
Further, volatile or significant weather events could result in substantial damage to the transmission and distribution lines of the traditional electric operating companies, the generating facilities of the traditional electric operating companies and Southern Power, and the natural gas distribution and storage facilities of Southern Company Gas. The Subsidiary Registrants have significant investments in the Atlantic and Gulf Coast regions and Southern Power and Southern Company Gas have investments in various states which could be subject to severe weather and natural disasters, including wildfires. Further, severe drought conditions can reduce the availability of water and restrict or prevent the operation of certain generating facilities. There have been multiple significant hurricanes in the Southern Company system service territory in recent years.
In the event a traditional electric operating company or Southern Company Gas experiences any of these weather events or any natural disaster or other catastrophic event, recovery of costs in excess of reserves and insurance coverage is subject to the approval of its state PSC or other applicable state regulatory agency. Historically, the traditional electric operating companies from time to time have experienced deficits in their storm cost recovery reserve balances and may experience such deficits in the future. For example, at December 31, 2018, Georgia Power had a substantial underrecovered balance in its storm cost recovery balance as a result of multiple recent significant hurricanes in its service territory. Any denial by the applicable state PSC or other applicable state regulatory agency or delay in recovery of any portion of such costs could have a material negative impact on a traditional electric operating company's or Southern Company Gas' and on Southern Company's results of operations, financial condition, and liquidity.
In addition, damages resulting from significant weather events within the service territory of any traditional electric operating company or Southern Company Gas or affecting Southern Power's customers may result in the loss of customers and reduced demand for energy for extended periods and may impact customers' ability to perform under existing PPAs. See Note 1 to the financial statements under "RevenuesConcentration of Revenue" in Item 8 herein for additional information on Pacific Gas & Electric Company's bankruptcy filing. Any significant loss of customers or reduction in demand for energy could have a material negative impact on a registrant's results of operations, financial condition, and liquidity.
Acquisitions, dispositions, or other strategic ventures or investments may not result in anticipated benefits and may present risks not originally contemplated, which may have a material adverse effect on the liquidity, results of operations, and financial condition of Southern Company and its subsidiaries.
Southern Company and its subsidiaries have made significant acquisitions and investments in the past, as well as recent dispositions, and may in the future make additional acquisitions, dispositions, or other strategic ventures or investments, including the pending disposition by Southern Power of Plant Mankato, which cannot be assured to be completed or beneficial to Southern Company or its subsidiaries. Southern Company and its subsidiaries continually seek opportunities to create value

I-33


through various transactions, including acquisitions or sales of assets. Specifically, Southern Power continually seeks opportunities to execute its strategy to create value through various transactions, including acquisitions, dispositions, and sales of partnership interests, development and construction of new generating facilities, and entry into PPAs primarily with investor-owned utilities, IPPs, municipalities, and other load-serving entities, as well as commercial and industrial customers.
Southern Company and its subsidiaries may face significant competition for transactional opportunities and anticipated transactions may not be completed on acceptable terms or at all. In addition, these transactions are intended to, but may not, result in the generation of cash or income, the realization of savings, the creation of efficiencies, or the reduction of risk. These transactions may also affect the liquidity, results of operations, and financial condition of Southern Company and its subsidiaries.
These transactions also involve risks, including:
they may not result in an increase in income or provide adequate or expected funds or return on capital or other anticipated benefits;
they may result in Southern Company or its subsidiaries entering into new or additional lines of business, which may have new or different business or operational risks;
they may not be successfully integrated into the acquiring company's operations and/or internal control processes;
the due diligence conducted prior to a transaction may not uncover situations that could result in financial or legal exposure or may not appropriately evaluate the likelihood or quantify the exposure from identified risks;
they may result in decreased earnings, revenues, or cash flow;
Southern Company, Southern Company Gas, and certain of their subsidiaries have retained obligations in connection with transitional agreements related to dispositions that subject these companies to additional risk;
Southern Company or the applicable subsidiary may not be able to achieve the expected financial benefits from the use of funds generated by any dispositions;
expected benefits of a transaction may be dependent on the cooperation or performance of a counterparty; or
for the traditional electric operating companies and Southern Company Gas, costs associated with such investments that were expected to be recovered through regulated rates may not be recoverable.
Southern Company and Southern Company Gas are holding companies and Southern Power owns many of its assets indirectly through subsidiaries. Each of these companies is dependent on cash flows from their respective subsidiaries to meet their ongoing and future financial obligations, including making interest and principal payments on outstanding indebtedness and, for Southern Company, to pay dividends on its common stock.
Southern Company and Southern Company Gas are holding companies and, as such, they have no operations of their own. Substantially all of Southern Company's and Southern Company Gas' and many of Southern Power's respective consolidated assets are held by subsidiaries. A significant portion of Southern Company Gas' debt is issued by its 100%-owned subsidiary, Southern Company Gas Capital, and is fully and unconditionally guaranteed by Southern Company Gas. Southern Company's, Southern Company Gas' and, to a certain extent, Southern Power's ability to meet their respective financial obligations, including making interest and principal payments on outstanding indebtedness, and, for Southern Company, to pay dividends on its common stock, is dependent on the net income and cash flows of their respective subsidiaries and the ability of those subsidiaries to pay upstream dividends or to repay borrowed funds. Prior to funding Southern Company, Southern Company Gas, or Southern Power, the respective subsidiaries have financial obligations and, with respect to Southern Company and Southern Company Gas, regulatory restrictions that must be satisfied, including among others, debt service and preferred stock dividends. These subsidiaries are separate legal entities and, except as described below, have no obligation to provide Southern Company, Southern Company Gas, or Southern Power with funds. Certain of Southern Power's assets are held through controlling interests in subsidiaries. In certain cases, distributions without partner consent are limited to available cash, and the subsidiaries are obligated to distribute all available cash to their owners each quarter. In addition, Southern Company, Southern Company Gas, and Southern Power may provide capital contributions or debt financing to subsidiaries under certain circumstances, which would reduce the funds available to meet their respective financial obligations, including making interest and principal payments on outstanding indebtedness, and to pay dividends on Southern Company's common stock.
A downgrade in the credit ratings of any of the registrants, Southern Company Gas Capital, or Nicor Gas could negatively affect their ability to access capital at reasonable costs and/or could require posting of collateral or replacing certain indebtedness.
There are a number of factors that rating agencies evaluate to arrive at credit ratings for the registrants, Southern Company Gas Capital, and Nicor Gas, including capital structure, regulatory environment, the ability to cover liquidity requirements, and other commitments for capital. The registrants, Southern Company Gas Capital, and Nicor Gas could experience a downgrade in their ratings if any rating agency concludes that the level of business or financial risk of the industry or the applicable company has deteriorated. Changes in ratings methodologies by the agencies could also have a negative impact on credit ratings. If one or more rating agencies downgrade any registrant, Southern Company Gas Capital, or Nicor Gas, borrowing

I-34


costs likely would increase, including automatic increases in interest rates under applicable term loans and credit facilities, the pool of investors and funding sources would likely decrease, and, particularly for any downgrade to below investment grade, significant collateral requirements may be triggered in a number of contracts. Any credit rating downgrades could require altering the mix of debt financing currently used, and could require the issuance of secured indebtedness and/or indebtedness with additional restrictive covenants binding the applicable company.
Uncertainty in demand for energy can result in lower earnings or higher costs. If demand for energy falls short of expectations, it could result in potentially stranded assets. If demand for energy exceeds expectations, it could result in increased costs forpurchasing capacity in the open market or building additional electric generation and transmissionfacilities or natural gas distribution and storage facilities.
Southern Company, the traditional electric operating companies, and Southern Power each engage in a long-term planning process to estimate the optimal mix and timing of new generation assets required to serve future load obligations. Southern Company Gas engages in a long-term planning process to estimate the optimal mix and timing of building new pipelines and storage facilities, replacing existing pipelines, rewatering storage facilities, and entering new markets and/or expanding in existing markets. These planning processes must look many years into the future in order to accommodate the long lead times associated with the permitting and construction of new generation and associated transmission facilities and natural gas distribution and storage facilities. Inherent risk exists in predicting demand as future loads are dependent on many uncertain factors, including economic conditions, customer usage patterns, efficiency programs, and customer technology adoption. Because regulators may not permit the traditional electric operating companies or Southern Company Gas' regulated operating companies to adjust rates to recover the costs of new generation and associated transmission assets and/or new pipelines and related infrastructure in a timely manner or at all, Southern Company and its subsidiaries may not be able to fully recover these costs or may have exposure to regulatory lag associated with the time between the incurrence of costs and the recovery in customers' rates. In addition, under Southern Power's model of selling capacity and energy at negotiated market-based rates under long-term PPAs, Southern Power might not be able to fully execute its business plan if market prices drop below original forecasts. Southern Power and/or the traditional electric operating companies may not be able to extend existing PPAs or find new buyers for existing generation assets as existing PPAs expire, or they may be forced to market these assets at prices lower than originally intended. These situations could have negative impacts on net income and cash flows for the affected registrant.
The traditional electric operating companies are currently obligated to supply power to retail customers and wholesale customers under long-term PPAs. Southern Power is currently obligated to supply power to wholesale customers under long-term PPAs. At peak times, the demand for power required to meet this obligation could exceed the Southern Company system's available generation capacity. Market or competitive forces may require that the traditional electric operating companies purchase capacity on the open market or build additional generation and transmission facilities and that Southern Power purchase energy or capacity on the open market. Because regulators may not permit the traditional electric operating companies to pass all of these purchase or construction costs on to their customers, the traditional electric operating companies may not be able to recover some or all of these costs or may have exposure to regulatory lag associated with the time between the incurrence of costs of purchased or constructed capacity and the traditional electric operating companies' recovery in customers' rates. Under Southern Power's long-term fixed price PPAs, Southern Power may not be able to recover all of these costs. These situations could have negative impacts on net income and cash flows for the affected registrant.
The businesses of the registrants, SEGCO, and Nicor Gas are dependent on their ability to successfully access funds through capital markets and financial institutions. Theinability of any of the registrants, SEGCO, or Nicor Gas to access funds may limit its ability to execute its business plan by impacting its ability to fund capital investments or acquisitions that it may otherwise rely on to achieve future earnings and cash flows.
The registrants, SEGCO, and Nicor Gas rely on access to both short-term money markets and longer-term capital markets as a significant source of liquidity for capital requirements not satisfied by the cash flow from their respective operations. If any of the registrants, SEGCO, or Nicor Gas is not able to access capital at competitive rates or on favorable terms, its ability to implement its business plan will be limited by impacting its ability to fund capital investments or acquisitions that it may otherwise rely on to achieve future earnings and cash flows. In addition, the registrants, SEGCO, and Nicor Gas rely on committed bank lending agreements as back-up liquidity which allows them to access low cost money markets. Each of the registrants, SEGCO, and Nicor Gas believes that it will maintain sufficient access to these financial markets based upon current credit ratings. However, certain events or market disruptions may increase the cost of borrowing or adversely affect the ability to raise capital through the issuance of securities or other borrowing arrangements or the ability to secure committed bank lending agreements used as back-up sources of capital. Such disruptions could include:
an economic downturn or uncertainty;
bankruptcy or financial distress at an unrelated energy company, financial institution, or sovereign entity;
capital markets volatility and disruption, either nationally or internationally;
changes in tax policy, including further interpretation and guidance on tax reform;

I-35


volatility in market prices for electricity and natural gas;
actual or threatened cyber or physical attacks on the Southern Company system's facilities or unrelated energy companies' facilities;
war or threat of war; or
the overall health of the utility and financial institution industries.
Georgia Power's ability to make future borrowings through its term loan credit facility with the FFB is subject to the satisfaction of customary conditions, as well as certification of compliance with the requirements of the loan guarantee program under Title XVII of the Energy Policy Act of 2005, including accuracy of project-related representations and warranties, delivery of updated project-related information and evidence of compliance with the prevailing wage requirements of the Davis-Bacon Act of 1931, as amended, and certification from the DOE's consulting engineer that proceeds of the advances are used to reimburse certain costs of construction relating to Plant Vogtle Units 3 and 4 that are eligible for financing under the Title XVII Loan Guarantee Program. Prior to obtaining any further advances under Georgia Power's loan guarantee agreement with the DOE, Georgia Power is required to obtain the DOE's approval of the Bechtel Agreement.
Failure to comply with debt covenants or conditions could adversely affect the ability of the registrants, SEGCO, Southern Company Gas Capital, or Nicor Gas to execute future borrowings.
The debt and credit agreements of the registrants, SEGCO, Southern Company Gas Capital, and Nicor Gas contain various financial and other covenants. Georgia Power's loan guarantee agreement with the DOE contains additional covenants, events of default, and mandatory prepayment events relating to the construction of Plant Vogtle Units 3 and 4. Failure to meet those covenants beyond applicable grace periods could result in accelerated due dates and/or termination of the agreements, which would negatively affect the applicable company's financial condition and liquidity.
Volatility in the securities markets, interest rates, and other factors could substantially increase defined benefit pension and other postretirement plan costs and the funding available for nuclear decommissioning.
The costs of providing pension and other postretirement benefit plans are dependent on a number of factors, such as the rates of return on plan assets, discount rates, the level of interest rates used to measure the required minimum funding levels of the plan, changes in actuarial assumptions, government regulations, and/or life expectancy, and the frequency and amount of the Southern Company system's required or voluntary contributions made to the plans. Changes in actuarial assumptions and differences between the assumptions and actual values, as well as a significant decline in the value of investments that fund the pension and other postretirement plans, if not offset or mitigated by a decline in plan liabilities, could increase pension and other postretirement expense, and the Southern Company system could be required from time to time to fund the pension plans with significant amounts of cash. Such cash funding obligations could have a material impact on liquidity by reducing cash flows and could negatively affect results of operations. Additionally, Alabama Power and Georgia Power each hold significant assets in their nuclear decommissioning trusts to satisfy obligations to decommission Alabama Power's and Georgia Power's nuclear plants. The rate of return on assets held in those trusts can significantly impact both the funding available for decommissioning and the funding requirements for the trusts.
The registrants are subject to risks associated with their ability to obtain adequate insurance at acceptable costs.
The financial condition of some insurance companies, actual or threatened physical or cyber attacks, and natural disasters, among other things, could have disruptive effects on insurance markets. The availability of insurance covering risks that the registrants and their respective competitors typically insure against may decrease, and the insurance that the registrants are able to obtain may have higher deductibles, higher premiums, and more restrictive policy terms. Further, the insurance policies may not cover all of the potential exposures or the actual amount of loss incurred.
Any losses not covered by insurance, or any increases in the cost of applicable insurance, could adversely affect the results of operations, cash flows, or financial condition of the affected registrant.
The use of derivative contracts by Southern Company and its subsidiaries in thenormal course of business could result in financial losses that negatively impact thenet income of the registrants or in reported net income volatility.
Southern Company and its subsidiaries use derivative instruments, such as swaps, options, futures, and forwards, to manage their commodity and interest rate exposures and, to a lesser extent, manage foreign currency exchange rate exposure and engage in limited trading activities. The registrants could recognize financial losses as a result of volatility in the market values of these contracts or if a counterparty fails to perform. These risks are managed through risk management policies, limits, and procedures, which might not work as planned and cannot entirely eliminate the risks associated with these activities. In addition, derivative contracts entered into for hedging purposes might not offset the underlying exposure being hedged as expected, resulting in financial losses. In the absence of actively quoted market prices and pricing information from external sources, the valuation of these financial instruments can involve management's judgment or use of estimates. The factors used in the valuation of these instruments become more difficult to predict and the calculations become less reliable further into the

I-36


future. As a result, changes in the underlying assumptions or use of alternative valuation methods could affect the reported fair value of these contracts.
In addition, Southern Company Gas utilizes derivative instruments to lock in economic value in wholesale gas services, which may not qualify as, or may not be designated as, hedges for accounting purposes. The difference in accounting treatment for the underlying position and the financial instrument used to hedge the value of the contract can cause volatility in reported net income of Southern Company and Southern Company Gas while the positions are open due to mark-to-market accounting.
Future impairments of goodwill or long-lived assets could have a material adverse effect on the registrants' results of operations.
Goodwill is assessed for impairment at least annually and more frequently if events or circumstances occur that would more likely than not reduce the fair value of a reporting unit below its carrying value and long-lived assets are assessed for impairment whenever events or circumstances indicate that an asset's carrying amount may not be recoverable. In connection with the completion of the Merger, the application of the acquisition method of accounting was pushed down to Southern Company Gas. The excess of the purchase price over the fair values of Southern Company Gas' assets and liabilities was recorded as goodwill. This resulted in a significant increase in the goodwill recorded on Southern Company's and Southern Company Gas' consolidated balance sheets. At December 31, 2018, goodwill was $5.3 billion and $5.0 billion for Southern Company and Southern Company Gas, respectively.
In addition, Southern Company and its subsidiaries have long-lived assets recorded on their balance sheets. To the extent the value of goodwill or long-lived assets become impaired, the affected registrant may be required to incur impairment charges that could have a material impact on their results of operations. For example, a wholly-owned subsidiary of Southern Company Gas owns and operates a natural gas storage facility consisting of two salt dome caverns where recent seismic mapping indicates that proximity of one of the caverns to the edge of the salt dome may be less than the required minimum and could result in Southern Company Gas retiring the cavern early. Early retirement of the cavern could trigger impairment of other long-lived assets associated with the natural gas storage facility. In addition, a subsidiary of Southern Company has several leveraged lease agreements, with terms ranging up to 45 years, which relate to international and domestic energy generation, distribution, and transportation assets. Southern Company receives federal income tax deductions for depreciation and amortization, as well as interest on long-term debt related to these investments. Southern Company reviews all important lease assumptions at least annually, or more frequently if events or changes in circumstances indicate that a change in assumptions has occurred or may occur. With respect to Southern Company's subsidiary's investments in leveraged leases, the recovery of its investment is dependent on the profitable operation of the leased assets by the respective lessees. A significant deterioration in the performance of the leased asset could result in the impairment of the related lease receivable.
Item 1B.UNRESOLVED STAFF COMMENTS.
None.

I-37


Item 2. PROPERTIES
Electric
Electric Properties
The traditional electric operating companies, Southern Power, and SEGCO, at January 1, 2019, owned and/or operated 33 hydroelectric generating stations, 26 fossil fuel generating stations, three nuclear generating stations, 13 combined cycle/cogeneration stations, 40 solar facilities, nine wind facilities, and one biomass facility. The amounts of capacity for each company, at January 1, 2019, are shown in the table below.
Generating StationLocation
Nameplate
Capacity (1)

 
  (KWs)
 
FOSSIL STEAM   
GadsdenGadsden, AL120,000
 
GorgasJasper, AL1,021,250
(2)
BarryMobile, AL1,300,000
 
Greene CountyDemopolis, AL300,000
(3)
Gaston Unit 5Wilsonville, AL880,000
 
MillerBirmingham, AL2,532,288
(4)
Alabama Power Total 6,153,538
 
BowenCartersville, GA3,160,000
 
HammondRome, GA800,000
(5)
McIntoshEffingham County, GA163,117
(5)
SchererMacon, GA750,924
(6)
WansleyCarrollton, GA925,550
(7)
YatesNewnan, GA700,000
 
Georgia Power Total 6,499,591
 
DanielPascagoula, MS500,000
(8)
Greene CountyDemopolis, AL200,000
(3)
WatsonGulfport, MS750,000
 
Mississippi Power Total 1,450,000
 
Gaston Units 1-4Wilsonville, AL  
SEGCO Total 1,000,000
(9)
Total Fossil Steam 15,103,129
 
NUCLEAR STEAM   
FarleyDothan, AL  
Alabama Power Total 1,720,000
 
HatchBaxley, GA899,612
(10)
Vogtle Units 1 and 2Augusta, GA1,060,240
(11)
Georgia Power Total 1,959,852
 
Total Nuclear Steam 3,679,852
 

I-38


Generating StationLocation
Nameplate
Capacity (1)

 
COMBUSTION TURBINES   
Greene CountyDemopolis, AL  
Alabama Power Total 720,000
 
BoulevardSavannah, GA19,700
 
McDonough Unit 3Atlanta, GA78,800
 
McIntosh Units 1 through 8Effingham County, GA640,000
 
McManusBrunswick, GA481,700
 
RobinsWarner Robins, GA158,400
 
WansleyCarrollton, GA26,322
(7)
WilsonAugusta, GA354,100
 
Georgia Power Total 1,759,022
 
Chevron Cogenerating StationPascagoula, MS147,292
(12)
SweattMeridian, MS39,400
 
WatsonGulfport, MS39,360
 
Mississippi Power Total 226,052
 
AddisonThomaston, GA668,800
 
Cleveland CountyCleveland County, NC720,000
 
DahlbergJackson County, GA756,000
 
RowanSalisbury, NC455,250
 
Southern Power Total 2,600,050
 
Gaston (SEGCO)
Wilsonville, AL19,680
(9)
Total Combustion Turbines 5,324,804
 
COGENERATION   
Washington CountyWashington County, AL123,428
 
Lowndes CountyBurkeville, AL104,800
 
TheodoreTheodore, AL236,418
 
Alabama Power Total 464,646
 
COMBINED CYCLE   
BarryMobile, AL  
Alabama Power Total 1,070,424
 
McIntosh Units 10 and 11Effingham County, GA1,318,920
 
McDonough-Atkinson Units 4 through 6Atlanta, GA2,520,000
 
Georgia Power Total 3,838,920
 
DanielPascagoula, MS1,070,424
 
RatcliffeKemper County, MS769,898
(13)
Mississippi Power Total 1,840,322
 
FranklinSmiths, AL1,857,820
 
HarrisAutaugaville, AL1,318,920
 
MankatoMankato, MN375,000
(14)
RowanSalisbury, NC530,550
 
Wansley Units 6 and 7Carrollton, GA1,073,000
 
Southern Power Total 5,155,290
 
Total Combined Cycle 11,904,956
 

I-39


Generating StationLocation
Nameplate
Capacity (1)

 
HYDROELECTRIC FACILITIES   
BankheadHolt, AL53,985
 
BouldinWetumpka, AL225,000
 
HarrisWedowee, AL132,000
 
HenryOhatchee, AL72,900
 
HoltHolt, AL46,944
 
JordanWetumpka, AL100,000
 
LayClanton, AL177,000
 
Lewis SmithJasper, AL157,500
 
Logan MartinVincent, AL135,000
 
MartinDadeville, AL182,000
 
MitchellVerbena, AL170,000
 
ThurlowTallassee, AL81,000
 
WeissLeesburg, AL87,750
 
YatesTallassee, AL47,000
 
Alabama Power Total 1,668,079
 
Bartletts FerryColumbus, GA173,000
 
Goat RockColumbus, GA38,600
 
Lloyd ShoalsJackson, GA14,400
 
Morgan FallsAtlanta, GA16,800
 
North HighlandsColumbus, GA29,600
 
Oliver DamColumbus, GA60,000
 
Rocky MountainRome, GA215,256
(15)
Sinclair DamMilledgeville, GA45,000
 
Tallulah FallsClayton, GA72,000
 
TerroraClayton, GA16,000
 
TugaloClayton, GA45,000
 
Wallace DamEatonton, GA321,300
 
YonahToccoa, GA22,500
 
6 Other PlantsVarious Georgia locations18,080
 
Georgia Power Total 1,087,536
 
Total Hydroelectric Facilities 2,755,615
 

I-40


Generating StationLocation
Nameplate
Capacity (1)

 
RENEWABLE SOURCES:   
SOLAR FACILITIES   
Fort RuckerCalhoun County, AL10,560
 
Anniston Army DepotDale County, AL7,380
 
Alabama Power Total 17,940
 
Fort BenningColumbus, GA30,005
 
Fort GordonAugusta, GA30,000
 
Fort StewartFort Stewart, GA30,000
 
Kings BayCamden County, GA30,161
 
DaltonDalton, GA6,508
 
Marine Corps Logistics BaseAlbany, GA31,161
 
4 Other PlantsVarious Georgia locations5,171
 
Georgia Power Total 163,006
 
AdobeKern County, CA20,000
 
ApexNorth Las Vegas, NV20,000
 
Boulder IClark County, NV100,000
 
ButlerTaylor County, GA103,700
 
Butler Solar FarmTaylor County, GA22,000
 
CalipatriaImperial County, CA20,000
 
Campo VerdeImperial County, CA147,420
 
CimarronSpringer, NM30,640
 
Decatur CountyDecatur County, GA20,000
 
Decatur ParkwayDecatur County, GA84,000
 
Desert StatelineSan Bernadino County, CA299,900
 
East PecosPecos County, TX120,000
 
GarlandKern County, CA205,130
 
Gaskell West IKern County, CA20,000
 
GranvilleOxford, NC2,500
 
HenriettaKings County, CA102,000
 
Imperial ValleyImperial County, CA163,200
 
LamesaDawson County, TX102,000
 
Lost Hills - BlackwellKern County, CA33,440
 
Macho SpringsLuna County, NM55,000
 
Morelos del SolKern County, CA15,000
 
North StarFresno County, CA61,600
 
PawpawTaylor County, GA30,480
 
RoserockPecos County, TX160,000
 
RutherfordRutherford County, NC74,800
 
SandhillsTaylor County, GA146,890
 
SpectrumClark County, NV30,240
 
TranquillityFresno County, CA205,300
 
Southern Power Total 2,395,240
(16)
Total Solar 2,576,186
 

I-41


Generating StationLocation
Nameplate
Capacity (1)

 
WIND FACILITIES   
BethelCastro County, TX276,000
 
Cactus FlatsConcho County, TX148,350
 
Grant PlainsGrant County, OK147,200
 
Grant WindGrant County, OK151,800
 
Kay WindKay County, OK299,000
 
PassadumkeagPenobscot County, ME42,900
 
Salt ForkDonley & Gray Counties TX174,000
 
Tyler BluffCooke County, TX125,580
 
Wake WindCrosby & Floyd Counties, TX257,250
 
Southern Power Total 1,622,080
(17)
BIOMASS FACILITY   
NacogdochesSacul, TX  
Southern Power Total 115,500
 
    
Total Alabama Power Generating Capacity 11,814,627
 
Total Georgia Power Generating Capacity 15,307,927
 
Total Mississippi Power Generating Capacity 3,516,374
 
Total Southern Power Generating Capacity 11,888,160
 
Total Generating Capacity 43,546,768
 
Notes:
(1)See "Jointly-Owned Facilities" herein and Note 5 to the financial statements under "Joint Ownership Agreements" in Item 8 herein for additional information.
(2)As part of its environmental compliance strategy, Alabama Power plans to retire Plant Gorgas Units 8, 9, and 10 by April 15, 2019. See Note 2 to the financial statements under "Alabama Power – Environmental Accounting Order" in Item 8 herein for additional information.
(3)Owned by Alabama Power and Mississippi Power as tenants in common in the proportions of 60% and 40%, respectively. Capacity shown for each company represents its portion of total plant capacity.
(4)Capacity shown is Alabama Power's portion (95.92%) of total plant capacity.
(5)Georgia Power has requested to decertify and retire Plant Hammond Units 1 through 4 and Plant McIntosh Unit 1 upon approval of its 2019 IRP filing. See Note 2 to the financial statements under "Georgia Power – Integrated Resource Plan" in Item 8 herein for additional information.
(6)Capacity shown for Georgia Power is 8.4% of Units 1 and 2 and 75% of Unit 3.
(7)Capacity shown is Georgia Power's portion (53.5%) of total plant capacity.
(8)Capacity shown is Mississippi Power's portion (50%) of total plant capacity.
(9)SEGCO is jointly-owned by Alabama Power and Georgia Power. See BUSINESS in Item 1 herein for additional information. Also see Note 7 to the financial statements under "SEGCO" in Item 8 herein.
(10)Capacity shown is Georgia Power's portion (50.1%) of total plant capacity.
(11)Capacity shown is Georgia Power's portion (45.7%) of total plant capacity.
(12)Generation is dedicated to a single industrial customer. See MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS – FINANCIAL CONDITION AND LIQUIDITY – "Credit Rating Risk" of Mississippi Power in Item 7 herein.
(13)The capacity shown is the gross capacity using natural gas fuel without supplemental firing.
(14)On November 5, 2018, Southern Power entered into an agreement with Northern States Power to sell all of its equity interests in Plant Mankato (including the 385-MW expansion currently under construction). The ultimate outcome of this matter cannot be determined at this time. See Note 15 to the financial statements under "Southern Power – Sales of Natural Gas Plants" in Item 8 herein for additional information.
(15)Capacity shown is Georgia Power's portion (25.4%) of total plant capacity. OPC operates the plant.
(16)In May 2018, Southern Power sold a noncontrolling 33% equity interest in SP Solar (a limited partnership indirectly owning all of Southern Power's solar facilities, except the Roserock and Gaskell West facilities). SP Solar is the 51% majority owner of Boulder 1, Garland, Henrietta, Imperial Valley, Lost Hills Blackwell, North Star, and Tranquillity; the 66% majority owner of Desert Stateline; and the sole owner of the remaining SP Solar facilities. Southern Power is the 51% majority owner of Roserock and also the controlling partner in a tax equity partnership owning Gaskell West. All of these entities are consolidated subsidiaries of Southern Power and the capacity shown in the table is 100% of the nameplate capacity for the respective facility.
(17)In December 2018, Southern Power sold a noncontrolling tax equity interest in SP Wind (which owns all of Southern Power's wind facilities, except Cactus Flats). SP Wind is the 90.1% majority owner of Wake Wind and owns 100% of the remaining SP Wind facilities. Southern Power is the controlling partner in a tax equity partnership owning Cactus Flats. All of these entities are consolidated subsidiaries of Southern Power and the capacity shown in the table is 100% of the nameplate capacity for the respective facility.

I-42


Except as discussed below under "Titles to Property," the principal plants and other important units of the traditional electric operating companies, Southern Power, and SEGCO are owned in fee by the respective companies. It is the opinion of management of each such company that its operating properties are adequately maintained and are substantially in good operating condition, and suitable for their intended purpose.
Mississippi Power owns a 79-mile length of 500-kilovolt transmission line which is leased to Entergy Gulf States Louisiana, LLC. The line extends from Plant Daniel to the Louisiana state line. Entergy Gulf States Louisiana, LLC is paying a use fee over a 40-year period through 2024 covering all expenses and the amortization of the original cost. At December 31, 2018, the unamortized portion was approximately $12 million.
Mississippi Power owns a lignite mine and equipment that were intended to provide fuel for the Kemper IGCC. Mississippi Power also has acquired mineral reserves located around the Kemper County energy facility. Liberty Fuels Company, LLC, the operator of the mine, has a legal obligation to perform mine reclamation and Mississippi Power has a contractual obligation to fund all reclamation activities. As a result of the abandonment of the Kemper IGCC, final mine reclamation began in 2018 and is expected to be substantially completed in 2020, with monitoring expected to continue through 2027. Mississippi Power is currently evaluating its options regarding the final disposition of the CO2 pipeline, including removal of the pipeline. This evaluation is expected to be complete later in 2019. The ultimate outcome of these matters cannot be determined at this time. See Note 2 to the financial statements under "Mississippi Power – Kemper County Energy Facility – Lignite Mine and CO2 Pipeline Facilities" in Item 8 herein for additional information on the lignite mine and CO2 pipeline.
In August 2018, Mississippi Power filed a RMP which identified alternatives that, if implemented, could impact Mississippi Power's generating stations as well as Plant Greene County, jointly owned by Mississippi Power and Alabama Power. See BUSINESS in Item 1 herein under "Rate Matters – Integrated Resource Planning – Mississippi Power" for additional information.
In conjunction with Southern Company's sale of Gulf Power, Mississippi Power and Gulf Power have committed to seek a restructuring of their 50% undivided ownership interests in Plant Daniel such that each of them would, after the restructuring, own 100% of a generating unit. On January 15, 2019, Gulf Power provided notice to Mississippi Power that Gulf Power will retire its share of the generating capacity of Plant Daniel on January 15, 2024. Mississippi Power has the option to purchase Gulf Power's ownership interest for $1 on January 15, 2024, provided that Mississippi Power exercises the option no later than 120 days prior to that date. Mississippi Power is assessing the potential operational and economic effects of Gulf Power's notice. The ultimate outcome of these matters remains subject to completion of Mississippi Power's evaluations and applicable regulatory approvals, including the FERC and the Mississippi PSC, and cannot now be determined. See Note 15 to the financial statements under "Southern Company's Sale of Gulf Power" in Item 8 herein for information regarding the sale of Gulf Power.
In 2018, the maximum demand on the traditional electric operating companies, Southern Power Company, and SEGCO was 36,429,000 KWs and occurred on January 18, 2018. The all-time maximum demand of 38,777,000 KWs on the traditional electric operating companies, Southern Power Company, and SEGCO occurred on August 22, 2007. These amounts exclude demand served by capacity retained by MEAG Power, OPC, and SEPA. The reserve margin for the traditional electric operating companies, Southern Power Company, and SEGCO in 2018 was 29.8%. See SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA in Item 6 herein for additional information.
Jointly-Owned Facilities
Alabama Power, Georgia Power, and Mississippi Power at January 1, 2019 had undivided interests in certain generating plants and other related facilities with non-affiliated parties. The percentages of ownership of the total plant or facility are as follows:
    Percentage Ownership  
  
Total
Capacity
 
Alabama
Power
 
Power
South
 
Georgia
Power
 
Mississippi
Power
 OPC 
MEAG
Power
 Dalton 
Gulf
Power
  (MWs)                
Plant Miller Units 1 and 2 1,320
 91.8% 8.2% % % % % % %
Plant Hatch 1,796
 
 
 50.1
 
 30.0
 17.7
 2.2
 
Plant Vogtle Units 1 and 2 2,320
 
 
 45.7
 
 30.0
 22.7
 1.6
 
Plant Scherer Units 1 and 2 1,636
 
 
 8.4
 
 60.0
 30.2
 1.4
 
Plant Scherer Unit 3 818
 
 
 75.0
 
 
 
 
 25.0
Plant Wansley 1,779
 
 
 53.5
 
 30.0
 15.1
 1.4
 
Rocky Mountain 903
 
 
 25.4
 
 74.6
 
 
 
Plant Daniel Units 1 and 2 1,000
 
 
 
 50.0
 
 
 
 50.0

I-43


Alabama Power, Georgia Power, and Mississippi Power have contracted to operate and maintain the respective units in which each has an interest (other than Rocky Mountain) as agent for the joint owners. Southern Nuclear operates and provides services to Alabama Power's and Georgia Power's nuclear plants.
In addition, Georgia Power has commitments regarding a portion of a 5% interest in Plant Vogtle Units 1 and 2 owned by MEAG Power that are in effect until the later of retirement of the plant or the latest stated maturity date of MEAG Power's bonds issued to finance such ownership interest. The payments for capacity are required whether any capacity is available. The energy cost is a function of each unit's variable operating costs. Except for the portion of the capacity payments related to the Georgia PSC's disallowances of Plant Vogtle Units 1 and 2 costs, the cost of such capacity and energy is included in purchased power from non-affiliates in Georgia Power's statements of income in Item 8 herein. Also see Note 9 to the financial statements under "Fuel and Power Purchase Agreements" in Item 8 herein for additional information.
Construction continues on Plant Vogtle Units 3 and 4, which are jointly owned by the Vogtle Owners (with each owner holding the same undivided ownership interest as shown in the table above with respect to Plant Vogtle Units 1 and 2). See Note 2 to the financial statements under "Georgia PowerNuclear Construction" in Item 8 herein.
On December 4, 2018, Southern Power completed the sale of its 65% ownership interest in Plant Stanton Unit A, which Southern Power previously jointly-owned with OUC, FMPA, and KUA, to NextEra Energy. See Note 15 to the financial statements under "Southern PowerSales of Natural Gas Plants" in Item 8 herein for additional information.
Titles to Property
The traditional electric operating companies', Southern Power's, and SEGCO's interests in the principal plants and other important units of the respective companies are owned in fee by such companies, subject to the following major encumbrances: (1) liens pursuant to the assumption of debt obligations by Mississippi Power in connection with the acquisition of Plant Daniel Units 3 and 4, (2) a leasehold interest granted by Mississippi Power's largest retail customer, Chevron Products Company (Chevron), at the Chevron refinery, on which five combustion turbines of Mississippi Power are located, (3) liens pursuant to the agreements entered into with Chevron in October 2017 on Mississippi Power's co-generation assets located at the Chevron refinery, (4) liens associated with Georgia Power's reimbursement obligations to the DOE under its loan guarantee, which are secured by a first priority lien on (a) Georgia Power's 45.7% undivided ownership interest in Plant Vogtle Units 3 and 4 and (b) Georgia Power's rights and obligations under the principal contracts relating to Plant Vogtle Units 3 and 4, and (5) liens associated with two PPAs assumed as part of the acquisition of Plant Mankato in 2016 by Southern Power Company. See Note 5 to the financial statements under "Assets Subject to Lien," Note 8 to the financial statements under "Secured Debt" and "Long-term DebtDOE Loan Guarantee Borrowings," and Note 15 to the financial statements under "Southern PowerSales of Natural Gas Plants" in Item 8 herein for additional information. The traditional electric operating companies own the fee interests in certain of their principal plants as tenants in common. See "Jointly-Owned Facilities" herein and Note 5 to the financial statements under "Joint Ownership Agreements" in Item 8 herein for additional information. Properties such as electric transmission and distribution lines, steam heating mains, and gas pipelines are constructed principally on rights-of-way, which are maintained under franchise or are held by easement only. A substantial portion of lands submerged by reservoirs is held under flood right easements. In addition, certain of the renewable generating facilities occupy or use real property that is not owned, primarily through various leases, easements, rights-of-way, permits, or licenses from private landowners or governmental entities.
Natural Gas
Southern Company Gas considers its properties to be adequately maintained, substantially in good operating condition, and suitable for their intended purpose. The following provides the location and general character of the materially important properties that are used by the segments of Southern Company Gas. Substantially all of Nicor Gas' properties are subject to the lien of the indenture securing its first mortgage bonds. See Note 8 to the financial statements under "Long-term DebtOther Long-Term DebtSouthern Company Gas" in Item 8 herein for additional information.
Distribution and Transmission Mains – Southern Company Gas' distribution systems transport natural gas from its pipeline suppliers to customers in its service areas. These systems consist primarily of distribution and transmission mains, compressor stations, peak shaving/storage plants, service lines, meters, and regulators. At December 31, 2018, Southern Company Gas' gas distribution operations segment owned approximately 75,200 miles of underground distribution and transmission mains, which are located on easements or rights-of-way that generally provide for perpetual use.
Storage Assets – Gas Distribution Operations– Southern Company Gas owns and operates eight underground natural gas storage fields in Illinois with a total working capacity of approximately 150 Bcf, approximately 135 Bcf of which is usually cycled on an annual basis. This system is designed to meet about 50% of the estimated peak-day deliveries and approximately 40% of the normal winter deliveries in Illinois. This level of storage capability provides Nicor Gas with supply flexibility, improves the reliability of deliveries, and helps mitigate the risk associated with seasonal price movements.

I-44


Southern Company Gas also has four LNG plants located in Georgia and Tennessee with total LNG storage capacity of approximately 7.4 Bcf. In addition, Southern Company Gas owns two propane storage facilities in Virginia, each with storage capacity of approximately 0.3 Bcf. The LNG plants and propane storage facility are used by Southern Company Gas' gas distribution operations segment to supplement natural gas supply during peak usage periods.
Storage Assets – All Other– Southern Company Gas subsidiaries own three high-deliverability natural gas storage and hub facilities that are included in the all other segment. Jefferson Island Storage & Hub, LLC operates a storage facility in Louisiana consisting of two salt dome gas storage caverns. Golden Triangle Storage, Inc. operates a storage facility in Texas consisting of two salt dome caverns. Central Valley Gas Storage, LLC operates a depleted field storage facility in California. In addition, Southern Company Gas has a LNG facility in Alabama that produces LNG for Pivotal LNG, Inc. to support its business of selling LNG as a substitute fuel in various markets.
In August 2017, in connection with an ongoing integrity project into the salt dome gas storage caverns in Louisiana, updated seismic mapping indicated the proximity of one of the caverns to the edge of the salt dome may be less than the required minimum and could result in Southern Company Gas retiring the cavern early. See FUTURE EARNINGS POTENTIAL – "Other Matters" of Southern Company Gas in Item 7 herein and Note 3 to the financial statements under "Other MattersSouthern Company Gas" in Item 8 herein for additional information.
Jointly-Owned Properties– Southern Company Gas' gas pipeline investments segment has a 50% undivided ownership interest in a 115-mile pipeline facility in northwest Georgia that was placed in service in August 2017. Southern Company Gas also has an agreement to lease its 50% undivided ownership in the pipeline facility. See Note 5 to the financial statements under "Joint Ownership Agreements" in Item 8 herein for additional information.
Southern Company Gas owns a 50% interest in a LNG liquefaction and storage facility in Jacksonville, Florida, which was placed in service in October 2018 and is included in the all other segment. The facility is outfitted with a 2.0 million gallon storage tank with the capacity to produce in excess of 120,000 gallons of LNG per day.

I-45


Item 3.LEGAL PROCEEDINGS
See Note 3 to the financial statements in Item 8 herein for descriptions of legal and administrative proceedings discussed therein.
Item 4.MINE SAFETY DISCLOSURES
Not applicable.

I-46


EXECUTIVE OFFICERS OF SOUTHERN COMPANY
(Identification of executive officers of Southern Company is inserted in Part I in accordance with Regulation S-K, Item 401(b), Instruction 3.) The ages of the officers set forth below are as of December 31, 2018.
Thomas A. Fanning
Chairman, President, and Chief Executive Officer
Age 61
First elected in 2003. Chairman and Chief Executive Officer since December 2010 and President since August 2010.
Andrew W. Evans
Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
Age 52
First elected in 2016. Executive Vice President since July 2016 and Chief Financial Officer since June 2018. Previously served as Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of Southern Company Gas' Board of Directors from January 2016 through June 2018, President of Southern Company Gas from May 2015 through June 2018, Chief Operating Officer of Southern Company Gas from May 2015 through December 2015, and Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of Southern Company Gas from May 2006 through May 2015.
W. Paul Bowers
Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer of Georgia Power
Age 62
First elected in 2001. Chief Executive Officer, President, and Director of Georgia Power since January 2011. Chairman of Georgia Power's Board of Directors since May 2014.
S. W. Connally, Jr.
Executive Vice President of SCS
Age 49
First elected in 2012. Executive Vice President for Operations of SCS since June 2018. Previously served as President, Chief Executive Officer, and Director of Gulf Power from July 2012 through December 2018 and Chairman of Gulf Power's Board of Directors from July 2015 through December 2018.
Mark A. Crosswhite
Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer of Alabama Power
Age 56
First elected in 2010. President, Chief Executive Officer, and Director of Alabama Power since March 2014. Chairman of Alabama Power's Board of Directors since May 2014. Previously served as Executive Vice President and Chief Operating Officer of Southern Company from July 2012 through February 2014.
Kimberly S. Greene
Chairman, President, and Chief Executive Officer of Southern Company Gas
Age 52
First elected in 2013. Chairman, President, and Chief Executive Officer of Southern Company Gas since June 2018. Director of Southern Company Gas since July 2016. Previously served as Executive Vice President and Chief Operating Officer of Southern Company from March 2014 through June 2018 and President and Chief Executive Officer of SCS from April 2013 through February 2014.
James Y. Kerr II
Executive Vice President, Chief Legal Officer, and Chief Compliance Officer
Age 54
First elected in 2014. Executive Vice President, Chief Legal Officer (formerly known as General Counsel), and Chief Compliance Officer since March 2014. Before joining Southern Company, Mr. Kerr was a partner with McGuireWoods LLP and a senior advisor at McGuireWoods Consulting LLC from 2008 through February 2014.
Stephen E. Kuczynski
Chairman, President, and Chief Executive Officer of Southern Nuclear
Age 56
First elected in 2011. Chairman, President, and Chief Executive Officer of Southern Nuclear since July 2011.

I-47


Mark S. Lantrip
Executive Vice President
Age 64
First elected in 2014. Executive Vice President since February 2019. Chairman, President, and Chief Executive Officer of SCS since March 2014 and Chairman, President, and Chief Executive Officer of Southern Power since March 2018. Previously served as Treasurer of Southern Company from October 2007 to February 2014 and Executive Vice President of SCS from November 2010 to March 2014.
Anthony L. Wilson
Chairman, President, and Chief Executive Officer of Mississippi Power
Age 54
First elected in 2015. President of Mississippi Power since October 2015 and Chief Executive Officer and Director since January 2016. Chairman of Mississippi Power's Board of Directors since August 2016. Previously served as Executive Vice President of Mississippi Power from May 2015 to October 2015 and Executive Vice President of Georgia Power from January 2012 to May 2015.
Christopher C. Womack
Executive Vice President
Age 60
First elected in 2008. Executive Vice President and President of External Affairs since January 2009.
The officers of Southern Company were elected at the first meeting of the directors following the last annual meeting of stockholders held on May 23, 2018, for a term of one year or until their successors are elected and have qualified, except for Mr. Lantrip, whose election as Executive Vice President was effective February 11, 2019.


I-48


EXECUTIVE OFFICERS OF ALABAMA POWER
(Identification of executive officers of Alabama Power is inserted in Part I in accordance with Regulation S-K, Item 401(b), Instruction 3.) The ages of the officers set forth below are as of December 31, 2018.
Mark A. Crosswhite
Chairman, President, and Chief Executive Officer
Age 56
First elected in 2014. President, Chief Executive Officer, and Director since March 1, 2014. Chairman since May 2014. Previously served as Executive Vice President and Chief Operating Officer of Southern Company from July 2012 through February 2014.
Greg J. Barker
Executive Vice President
Age 55
First elected in 2016. Executive Vice President for Customer Services since February 2016. Previously served as Senior Vice President of Marketing and Economic Development from April 2012 to February 2016.
Philip C. Raymond
Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer, and Treasurer
Age 59
First elected in 2010. Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer, and Treasurer since August 2010.
Zeke W. Smith
Executive Vice President
Age 59
First elected in 2010. Executive Vice President of External Affairs since November 2010.
James P. Heilbron
Senior Vice President and Senior Production Officer
Age 47
First elected in 2013. Senior Vice President and Senior Production Officer of Alabama Power since March 2013 and Senior Vice President and Senior Production Officer – West of SCS and Senior Production Officer of Mississippi Power since October 2018.
R. Scott Moore
Senior Vice President
Age 51
First elected in 2017. Senior Vice President of Power Delivery since May 2017. Previously served as Vice President of Transmission from August 2012 to May 2017.
The officers of Alabama Power were elected at the meeting of the directors held on April 27, 2018 for a term of one year or until their successors are elected and have qualified.

I-49


PART II

Item 5.MARKET FOR REGISTRANTS' COMMON EQUITY, RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS AND ISSUER PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES
(a)(1) The common stock of Southern Company is listed and traded on the NYSE under the ticker symbol SO. The common stock is also traded on regional exchanges across the U.S.
There is no market for the other registrants' common stock, all of which is owned by Southern Company.
(a)(2) Number of Southern Company's common stockholders of record at January 31, 2019: 115,847
Each of the other registrants have one common stockholder, Southern Company.
(a)(3) Securities authorized for issuance under equity compensation plans.
See Part III, Item 12. Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters.
(b) Use of Proceeds
Not applicable.
(c) Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities
None.

Item 6.SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA

SELECTED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL AND OPERATING DATA 2014-2018
Southern Company and Subsidiary Companies 2018 Annual Report
 2018
 2017
 
2016(d)

 2015
 2014
Operating Revenues (in millions)$23,495
 $23,031
 $19,896
 $17,489
 $18,467
Total Assets (in millions)(a)
$116,914
 $111,005
 $109,697
 $78,318
 $70,233
Gross Property Additions (in millions)$8,205
 $5,984
 $7,624
 $6,169
 $6,522
Return on Average Common Equity (percent)(b)
9.11
 3.44
 10.80
 11.68
 10.08
Cash Dividends Paid Per Share of
 Common Stock
$2.3800
 $2.3000
 $2.2225
 $2.1525
 $2.0825
Consolidated Net Income Attributable to
   Southern Company (in millions)(b)
$2,226
 $842
 $2,448
 $2,367
 $1,963
Earnings Per Share —         
Basic$2.18
 $0.84
 $2.57
 $2.60
 $2.19
Diluted2.17
 0.84
 2.55
 2.59
 2.18
Capitalization (in millions):         
Common stockholders' equity$24,723
 $24,167
 $24,758
 $20,592
 $19,949
Preferred and preference stock of subsidiaries and
   noncontrolling interests
4,316
 1,361
 1,854
 1,390
 977
Redeemable preferred stock of subsidiaries291
 324
 118
 118
 375
Redeemable noncontrolling interests
 
 164
 43
 39
Long-term debt(a)(c)
40,736
 44,462
 42,629
 24,688
 20,644
Total (excluding amounts due within one year)(c)
$70,066
 $70,314
 $69,523
 $46,831
 $41,984
Capitalization Ratios (percent):         
Common stockholders' equity35.3
 34.4
 35.6
 44.0
 47.5
Preferred and preference stock of subsidiaries and
   noncontrolling interests
6.2
 1.9
 2.7
 3.0
 2.3
Redeemable preferred stock of subsidiaries0.4
 0.5
 0.2
 0.3
 0.9
Redeemable noncontrolling interests
 
 0.2
 0.1
 0.1
Long-term debt(a)(c)
58.1
 63.2
 61.3
 52.6
 49.2
Total (excluding amounts due within one year)(c)
100.0
 100.0
 100.0
 100.0
 100.0
Other Common Stock Data:         
Book value per share$23.91
 $23.99
 $25.00
 $22.59
 $21.98
Market price per share:         
High$49.43
 $53.51
 $54.64
 $53.16
 $51.28
Low42.38
 46.71
 46.00
 41.40
 40.27
Close (year-end)43.92
 48.09
 49.19
 46.79
 49.11
Market-to-book ratio (year-end) (percent)183.7
 200.5
 196.8
 207.2
 223.4
Price-earnings ratio (year-end) (times)20.1
 57.3
 19.1
 18.0
 22.4
Dividends paid (in millions)$2,425
 $2,300
 $2,104
 $1,959
 $1,866
Dividend yield (year-end) (percent)5.4
 4.8
 4.5
 4.6
 4.2
Dividend payout ratio (percent)108.9
 273.2
 86.0
 82.7
 95.0
Shares outstanding (in thousands):         
Average1,020,247
 1,000,336
 951,332
 910,024
 897,194
Year-end1,033,788
 1,007,603
 990,394
 911,721
 907,777
Stockholders of record (year-end)116,135
 120,803
 126,338
 131,771
 137,369
(a)A reclassification of debt issuance costs from Total Assets to Long-term debt of $202 million and a reclassification of deferred tax assets from Total Assets to Accumulated deferred income taxes of $488 million is reflected for 2014, in accordance with new accounting standards adopted in 2015 and applied retrospectively.
(b)Georgia Power recorded a pre-tax estimated probable loss of $1.1 billion ($0.8 billion after tax) in the second quarter 2018 to reflect its revised estimate to complete construction and start-up of Plant Vogtle Units 3 and 4. In addition, a significant loss to income was recorded by Mississippi Power related to the suspension of the Kemper IGCC in June 2017. Earnings in all periods presented were impacted by losses related to the Kemper IGCC. See Note 2 to the financial statements in Item 8 herein for additional information.
(c)Amounts related to Gulf Power have been reclassified to liabilities held for sale at December 31, 2018. See Note 15 to the financial statements under "Southern Company's Sale of Gulf Power" in Item 8 herein for additional information.
(d)The 2016 selected financial and operating data includes the operations of Southern Company Gas from the date of the Merger, July 1, 2016, through December 31, 2016. See Note 15 to the financial statements under "Southern Company Merger with Southern Company Gas" in Item 8 herein for additional information.

SELECTED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL AND OPERATING DATA 2014-2018 (continued)
Southern Company and Subsidiary Companies 2018 Annual Report
 2018
 2017
 
2016(a)

 2015
 2014
Operating Revenues (in millions):         
Residential$6,608
 $6,515
 $6,614
 $6,383
 $6,499
Commercial5,266
 5,439
 5,394
 5,317
 5,469
Industrial3,224
 3,262
 3,171
 3,172
 3,449
Other124
 114
 55
 115
 133
Total retail15,222
 15,330
 15,234
 14,987
 15,550
Wholesale2,516
 2,426
 1,926
 1,798
 2,184
Total revenues from sales of electricity17,738
 17,756
 17,160
 16,785
 17,734
Natural gas revenues3,854
 3,791
 1,596
 
 
Other revenues1,903
 1,484
 1,140
 704
 733
Total$23,495
 $23,031
 $19,896
 $17,489
 $18,467
Kilowatt-Hour Sales (in millions):         
Residential54,590
 50,536
 53,337
 52,121
 53,347
Commercial53,451
 52,340
 53,733
 53,525
 53,243
Industrial53,341
 52,785
 52,792
 53,941
 54,140
Other799
 846
 883
 897
 909
Total retail162,181
 156,507
 160,745
 160,484
 161,639
Wholesale sales49,963
 49,034
 37,043
 30,505
 32,786
Total212,144
 205,541
 197,788
 190,989
 194,425
Average Revenue Per Kilowatt-Hour (cents):         
Residential12.10
 12.89
 12.40
 12.25
 12.18
Commercial9.85
 10.39
 10.04
 9.93
 10.27
Industrial6.04
 6.18
 6.01
 5.88
 6.37
Total retail9.39
 9.80
 9.48
 9.34
 9.62
Wholesale5.04
 4.95
 5.20
 5.89
 6.66
Total sales8.36
 8.64
 8.68
 8.79
 9.12
Average Annual Kilowatt-Hour         
Use Per Residential Customer12,514
 11,618
 12,387
 13,318
 13,765
Average Annual Revenue         
Per Residential Customer$1,555
 $1,498
 $1,541
 $1,630
 $1,679
Plant Nameplate Capacity         
Ratings (year-end) (megawatts)45,824
 46,936
 46,291
 44,223
 46,549
Maximum Peak-Hour Demand (megawatts):         
Winter36,429
 31,956
 32,272
 36,794
 37,234
Summer34,841
 34,874
 35,781
 36,195
 35,396
System Reserve Margin (at peak) (percent)29.8
 30.8
 34.2
 33.2
 19.8
Annual Load Factor (percent)61.2
 61.4
 61.5
 59.9
 59.6
Plant Availability (percent):         
Fossil-steam81.4
 84.5
 86.4
 86.1
 85.8
Nuclear94.0
 94.7
 93.3
 93.5
 91.5
(a)The 2016 selected financial and operating data includes the operations of Southern Company Gas from the date of the Merger, July 1, 2016, through December 31, 2016. See Note 15 to the financial statements under "Southern Company Merger with Southern Company Gas" in Item 8 herein for additional information.

SELECTED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL AND OPERATING DATA 2014-2018 (continued)
Southern Company and Subsidiary Companies 2018 Annual Report
 2018
 2017
 
2016(a)

 2015
 2014
Source of Energy Supply (percent):         
Gas41.6
 41.9
 41.7
 42.7
 37.0
Coal27.0
 27.0
 30.3
 32.3
 39.3
Nuclear13.8
 14.5
 14.5
 15.2
 14.8
Hydro2.9
 2.1
 2.1
 2.6
 2.5
Other5.4
 5.4
 2.4
 0.8
 0.4
Purchased power9.3
 9.1
 9.0
 6.4
 6.0
Total100.0
 100.0
 100.0
 100.0
 100.0
Gas Sales Volumes (mmBtu in millions):         
Firm791
 729
 296
 
 
Interruptible109
 109
 53
 
 
Total900
 838
 349
 
 
Traditional Electric Operating Company
   Customers (year-end) (in thousands):
         
Residential4,053
 4,011
 3,970
 3,928
 3,890
Commercial(b)
603
 599
 595
 590
 586
Industrial(b)
17
 18
 17
 17
 17
Other12
 12
 11
 11
 11
Total electric customers4,685
 4,640
 4,593
 4,546
 4,504
Gas distribution operations customers4,248
 4,623
 4,586
 
 
Total utility customers8,933
 9,263
 9,179
 4,546
 4,504
Employees (year-end)30,286
 31,344
 32,015
 26,703
 26,369
(a)The 2016 selected financial and operating data includes the operations of Southern Company Gas from the date of the Merger, July 1, 2016, through December 31, 2016. See Note 15 to the financial statements under "Southern Company Merger with Southern Company Gas" in Item 8 herein for additional information.
(b)A reclassification of customers from commercial to industrial is reflected for years 2014-2015 to be consistent with the rate structure approved by the Georgia PSC. The impact to operating revenues, kilowatt-hour sales, and average revenue per kilowatt-hour by class is not material.


SELECTED FINANCIAL AND OPERATING DATA 2014-2018
Alabama Power Company 2018 Annual Report
 2018
 2017
 2016
 2015
 2014
Operating Revenues (in millions)$6,032
 $6,039
 $5,889
 $5,768
 $5,942
Net Income After Dividends
on Preferred and Preference Stock (in millions)
$930
 $848
 $822
 $785
 $761
Cash Dividends on Common Stock (in millions)$801
 $714
 $765
 $571
 $550
Return on Average Common Equity (percent)13.00
 12.89
 13.34
 13.37
 13.52
Total Assets (in millions)(*)
$26,730
 $23,864
 $22,516
 $21,721
 $20,493
Gross Property Additions (in millions)$2,273
 $1,949
 $1,338
 $1,492
 $1,543
Capitalization (in millions):         
Common stockholder's equity$7,477
 $6,829
 $6,323
 $5,992
 $5,752
Preference stock
 
 196
 196
 343
Redeemable preferred stock291
 291
 85
 85
 342
Long-term debt(*)
7,923
 7,628
 6,535
 6,654
 6,137
Total (excluding amounts due within one year)$15,691
 $14,748
 $13,139
 $12,927
 $12,574
Capitalization Ratios (percent):         
Common stockholder's equity47.7
 46.3
 48.1
 46.4
 45.8
Preference stock
 
 1.5
 1.5
 2.7
Redeemable preferred stock1.9
 2.0
 0.7
 0.7
 2.7
Long-term debt(*)
50.4
 51.7
 49.7
 51.4
 48.8
Total (excluding amounts due within one year)100.0
 100.0
 100.0
 100.0
 100.0
Customers (year-end):         
Residential1,273,526
 1,268,271
 1,262,752
 1,253,875
 1,247,061
Commercial200,032
 199,840
 199,146
 197,920
 197,082
Industrial6,158
 6,171
 6,090
 6,056
 6,032
Other760
 766
 762
 757
 753
Total1,480,476
 1,475,048
 1,468,750
 1,458,608
 1,450,928
Employees (year-end)6,650
 6,613
 6,805
 6,986
 6,935
(*)A reclassification of debt issuance costs from Total Assets to Long-term debt of $40 million and a reclassification of deferred tax assets from Total Assets to Accumulated deferred income taxes of $20 million is reflected for 2014, in accordance with new accounting standards adopted in 2015 and applied retrospectively.

























SELECTED FINANCIAL AND OPERATING DATA 2014-2018 (continued)
Alabama Power Company 2018 Annual Report
 2018
 2017
 2016
 2015
 2014
Operating Revenues (in millions):
         
Residential$2,335
 $2,302
 $2,322
 $2,207
 $2,209
Commercial1,578
 1,649
 1,627
 1,564
 1,533
Industrial1,428
 1,477
 1,416
 1,436
 1,480
Other26
 30
 (43) 27
 27
Total retail5,367
 5,458
 5,322
 5,234
 5,249
Wholesale — non-affiliates279
 276
 283
 241
 281
Wholesale — affiliates119
 97
 69
 84
 189
Total revenues from sales of electricity5,765
 5,831
 5,674
 5,559
 5,719
Other revenues267
 208
 215
 209
 223
Total$6,032
 $6,039
 $5,889
 $5,768
 $5,942
Kilowatt-Hour Sales (in millions):
         
Residential18,626
 17,219
 18,343
 18,082
 18,726
Commercial13,868
 13,606
 14,091
 14,102
 14,118
Industrial23,006
 22,687
 22,310
 23,380
 23,799
Other187
 198
 208
 201
 211
Total retail55,687
 53,710
 54,952
 55,765
 56,854
Wholesale — non-affiliates5,018
 5,415
 5,744
 3,567
 3,588
Wholesale — affiliates4,565
 4,166
 3,177
 4,515
 6,713
Total65,270
 63,291
 63,873
 63,847
 67,155
Average Revenue Per Kilowatt-Hour (cents):
         
Residential12.54
 13.37
 12.66
 12.21
 11.80
Commercial11.38
 12.12
 11.55
 11.09
 10.86
Industrial6.21
 6.51
 6.35
 6.14
 6.22
Total retail9.64
 10.16
 9.68
 9.39
 9.23
Wholesale4.15
 3.89
 3.95
 4.02
 4.56
Total sales8.83
 9.21
 8.88
 8.71
 8.52
Residential Average Annual
Kilowatt-Hour Use Per Customer
14,660
 13,601
 14,568
 14,454
 15,051
Residential Average Annual
Revenue Per Customer
$1,878
 $1,819
 $1,844
 $1,764
 $1,775
Plant Nameplate Capacity
Ratings (year-end) (megawatts)
11,815
 11,797
 11,797
 11,797
 12,222
Maximum Peak-Hour Demand (megawatts):
         
Winter11,744
 10,513
 10,282
 12,162
 11,761
Summer10,652
 10,711
 10,932
 11,292
 11,054
Annual Load Factor (percent)
60.1
 63.5
 63.5
 58.4
 61.4
Plant Availability (percent):
         
Fossil-steam81.6
 82.8
 83.0
 81.5
 82.5
Nuclear91.6
 97.6
 88.0
 92.1
 93.3
Source of Energy Supply (percent):
         
Coal43.8
 44.8
 47.1
 49.1
 49.0
Nuclear20.5
 22.2
 20.3
 21.3
 20.7
Gas17.2
 18.1
 17.1
 14.6
 15.4
Hydro6.7
 5.4
 4.8
 5.6
 5.5
Purchased power —         
From non-affiliates5.4
 4.6
 4.8
 4.4
 3.6
From affiliates6.4
 4.9
 5.9
 5.0
 5.8
Total100.0
 100.0
 100.0
 100.0
 100.0


SELECTED FINANCIAL AND OPERATING DATA 2014-2018
Georgia Power Company 2018 Annual Report
 2018
 2017
 2016
 2015
 2014
Operating Revenues (in millions)$8,420
 $8,310
 $8,383
 $8,326
 $8,988
Net Income After Dividends
on Preferred and Preference Stock (in millions)
(a)
$793
 $1,414
 $1,330
 $1,260
 $1,225
Cash Dividends on Common Stock (in millions)$1,396
 $1,281
 $1,305
 $1,034
 $954
Return on Average Common Equity (percent)6.04
 12.15
 12.05
 11.92
 12.24
Total Assets (in millions)(b)
$40,365
 $36,779
 $34,835
 $32,865
 $30,872
Gross Property Additions (in millions)$3,176
 $1,080
 $2,314
 $2,332
 $2,146
Capitalization (in millions):
        
Common stockholder's equity$14,323
 $11,931
 $11,356
 $10,719
 $10,421
Preferred and preference stock
 
 266
 266
 266
Long-term debt(b)
9,364
 11,073
 10,225
 9,616
 8,563
Total (excluding amounts due within one year)$23,687
 $23,004
 $21,847
 $20,601
 $19,250
Capitalization Ratios (percent):
        
Common stockholder's equity60.5
 51.9
 52.0
 52.0
 54.1
Preferred and preference stock
 
 1.2
 1.3
 1.4
Long-term debt(b)
39.5
 48.1
 46.8
 46.7
 44.5
Total (excluding amounts due within one year)100.0
 100.0
 100.0
 100.0
 100.0
Customers (year-end):         
Residential2,220,240
 2,185,782
 2,155,945
 2,127,658
 2,102,673
Commercial(c)
312,474
 308,939
 305,488
 302,891
 300,186
Industrial(c)
10,571
 10,644
 10,537
 10,429
 10,192
Other9,838
 9,766
 9,585
 9,261
 9,003
Total2,553,123
 2,515,131
 2,481,555
 2,450,239
 2,422,054
Employees (year-end)6,967
 6,986
 7,527
 7,989
 7,909
(a)Georgia Power recorded a pre-tax estimated probable loss of $1.1 billion ($0.8 billion after tax) in the second quarter 2018 to reflect its revised estimate to complete construction and start-up of Plant Vogtle Units 3 and 4.
(b)A reclassification of debt issuance costs from Total Assets to Long-term debt of $124 million and a reclassification of deferred tax assets from Total Assets to Accumulated deferred income taxes of $34 million is reflected for 2014, in accordance with new accounting standards adopted in 2015 and applied retrospectively.
(c)A reclassification of customers from commercial to industrial is reflected for years 2014-2015 to be consistent with the rate structure approved by the Georgia PSC. The impact to operating revenues, kilowatt-hour sales, and average revenue per kilowatt-hour by class is not material.


SELECTED FINANCIAL AND OPERATING DATA 2014-2018 (continued)
Georgia Power Company 2018 Annual Report
 2018
 2017
 2016
 2015
 2014
Operating Revenues (in millions):         
Residential$3,301
 $3,236
 $3,318
 $3,240
 $3,350
Commercial3,023
 3,092
 3,077
 3,094
 3,271
Industrial1,344
 1,321
 1,291
 1,305
 1,525
Other84
 89
 86
 88
 94
Total retail7,752
 7,738
 7,772
 7,727
 8,240
Wholesale — non-affiliates163
 163
 175
 215
 335
Wholesale — affiliates24
 26
 42
 20
 42
Total revenues from sales of electricity7,939
 7,927
 7,989
 7,962
 8,617
Other revenues481
 383
 394
 364
 371
Total$8,420
 $8,310
 $8,383
 $8,326
 $8,988
Kilowatt-Hour Sales (in millions):         
Residential28,331
 26,144
 27,585
 26,649
 27,132
Commercial32,958
 32,155
 32,932
 32,719
 32,426
Industrial23,655
 23,518
 23,746
 23,805
 23,549
Other549
 584
 610
 632
 633
Total retail85,493
 82,401
 84,873
 83,805
 83,740
Wholesale — non-affiliates3,140
 3,277
 3,415
 3,501
 4,323
Wholesale — affiliates526
 800
 1,398
 552
 1,117
Total89,159
 86,478
 89,686
 87,858
 89,180
Average Revenue Per Kilowatt-Hour (cents):         
Residential11.65
 12.38
 12.03
 12.16
 12.35
Commercial9.17
 9.62
 9.34
 9.46
 10.09
Industrial5.68
 5.62
 5.44
 5.48
 6.48
Total retail9.07
 9.39
 9.16
 9.22
 9.84
Wholesale5.10
 4.64
 4.51
 5.80
 6.93
Total sales8.90
 9.17
 8.91
 9.06
 9.66
Residential Average Annual
Kilowatt-Hour Use Per Customer
12,849
 12,028
 12,864
 12,582
 12,969
Residential Average Annual
Revenue Per Customer
$1,555
 $1,489
 $1,557
 $1,529
 $1,605
Plant Nameplate Capacity
Ratings (year-end) (megawatts)
15,308
 15,274
 15,274
 15,455
 17,593
Maximum Peak-Hour Demand (megawatts):         
Winter15,372
 13,894
 14,527
 15,735
 16,308
Summer15,748
 16,002
 16,244
 16,104
 15,777
Annual Load Factor (percent)64.5
 61.1
 61.9
 61.9
 61.2
Plant Availability (percent):         
Fossil-steam81.5
 85.0
 87.4
 85.6
 86.3
Nuclear95.0
 93.5
 95.6
 94.1
 90.8
Source of Energy Supply (percent):         
Gas29.1
 28.6
 28.2
 28.3
 26.3
Coal21.1
 22.4
 26.4
 24.5
 30.9
Nuclear17.6
 17.8
 17.6
 17.6
 16.7
Hydro1.9
 1.0
 1.1
 1.6
 1.3
Other0.3
 0.3
 
 
 
Purchased power —         
From non-affiliates7.3
 7.8
 6.7
 5.0
 3.8
From affiliates22.7
 22.1
 20.0
 23.0
 21.0
Total100.0
 100.0
 100.0
 100.0
 100.0


SELECTED FINANCIAL AND OPERATING DATA 2014-2018
Mississippi Power Company 2018 Annual Report
 2018
 2017
 2016
 2015
 2014
Operating Revenues (in millions)$1,265
 $1,187
 $1,163
 $1,138
 $1,243
Net Income (Loss) After Dividends
on Preferred Stock (in millions)
(a)(b)
$235
 $(2,590) $(50) $(8) $(329)
Return on Average Common Equity (percent)(a)(b)
15.83
 (120.43) (1.87) (0.34) (15.43)
Total Assets (in millions)(c)
$4,886
 $4,866
 $8,235
 $7,840
 $6,642
Gross Property Additions (in millions)$206
 $536
 $946
 $972
 $1,389
Capitalization (in millions):         
Common stockholder's equity$1,609
 $1,358
 $2,943
 $2,359
 $2,084
Redeemable preferred stock
 33
 33
 33
 33
Long-term debt(c)
1,539
 1,097
 2,424
 1,886
 1,621
Total (excluding amounts due within one year)$3,148
 $2,488
 $5,400
 $4,278
 $3,738
Capitalization Ratios (percent):         
Common stockholder's equity51.1
 54.6
 54.5
 55.1
 55.8
Redeemable preferred stock
 1.3
 0.6
 0.8
 0.9
Long-term debt(c)
48.9
 44.1
 44.9
 44.1
 43.3
Total (excluding amounts due within one year)100.0
 100.0
 100.0
 100.0
 100.0
Customers (year-end):         
Residential153,423
 153,115
 153,172
 153,158
 152,453
Commercial33,968
 33,992
 33,783
 33,663
 33,496
Industrial445
 452
 451
 467
 482
Other188
 173
 175
 175
 175
Total188,024
 187,732
 187,581
 187,463
 186,606
Employees (year-end)1,053
 1,242
 1,484
 1,478
 1,478
(a)As a result of the Tax Reform Legislation, Mississippi Power recorded an income tax expense (benefit) of $(35) million and $372 million in 2018 and 2017, respectively.
(b)A significant loss to income was recorded by Mississippi Power related to the suspension of the Kemper IGCC in June 2017. Earnings in all periods presented were impacted by losses related to the Kemper IGCC.
(c)A reclassification of debt issuance costs from Total Assets to Long-term debt of $9 million and a reclassification of deferred tax assets from Total Assets to Accumulated deferred income taxes of $105 million is reflected for 2014, in accordance with new accounting standards adopted in 2015 and applied retrospectively.


SELECTED FINANCIAL AND OPERATING DATA 2014-2018 (continued)
Mississippi Power Company 2018 Annual Report
 2018
 2017
 2016
 2015
 2014
Operating Revenues (in millions):         
Residential$273
 $257
 $260
 $238
 $239
Commercial286
 285
 279
 256
 257
Industrial321
 321
 313
 287
 291
Other9
 (9) 7
 (5) 8
Total retail889
 854
 859
 776
 795
Wholesale — non-affiliates263
 259
 261
 270
 323
Wholesale — affiliates91
 56
 26
 76
 107
Total revenues from sales of electricity1,243
 1,169
 1,146
 1,122
 1,225
Other revenues22
 18
 17
 16
 18
Total$1,265
 $1,187
 $1,163
 $1,138
 $1,243
Kilowatt-Hour Sales (in millions):         
Residential2,113
 1,944
 2,051
 2,025
 2,126
Commercial2,797
 2,764
 2,842
 2,806
 2,860
Industrial4,924
 4,841
 4,906
 4,958
 4,943
Other37
 39
 39
 40
 40
Total retail9,871
 9,588
 9,838
 9,829
 9,969
Wholesale — non-affiliates3,980
 3,672
 3,920
 3,852
 4,191
Wholesale — affiliates2,584
 2,024
 1,108
 2,807
 2,900
Total16,435
 15,284
 14,866
 16,488
 17,060
Average Revenue Per Kilowatt-Hour (cents):         
Residential12.92
 13.22
 12.68
 11.75
 11.26
Commercial10.23
 10.31
 9.82
 9.12
 8.99
Industrial6.52
 6.63
 6.38
 5.79
 5.89
Total retail9.01
 8.91
 8.73
 7.90
 7.97
Wholesale5.39
 5.53
 5.71
 5.20
 6.06
Total sales7.56
 7.65
 7.71
 6.80
 7.18
Residential Average Annual
Kilowatt-Hour Use Per Customer
13,768
 12,692
 13,383
 13,242
 13,934
Residential Average Annual
Revenue Per Customer
$1,780
 $1,680
 $1,697
 $1,556
 $1,568
Plant Nameplate Capacity
Ratings (year-end) (megawatts)
3,516
 3,628
 3,481
 3,561
 3,867
Maximum Peak-Hour Demand (megawatts):         
Winter2,763
 2,390
 2,195
 2,548
 2,618
Summer2,346
 2,322
 2,384
 2,403
 2,345
Annual Load Factor (percent)55.8
 63.1
 64.0
 60.6
 59.4
Plant Availability Fossil-Steam (percent)82.4
 89.1
 91.4
 90.6
 87.6
Source of Energy Supply (percent):         
Gas86.1
 88.0
 84.9
 81.6
 55.3
Coal6.9
 7.5
 8.0
 16.5
 39.7
Purchased power —         
From non-affiliates4.7
 0.5
 (0.3) 0.4
 1.4
From affiliates2.3
 4.0
 7.4
 1.5
 3.6
Total100.0
 100.0
 100.0
 100.0
 100.0


SELECTED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL AND OPERATING DATA 2014-2018
Southern Power Company and Subsidiary Companies 2018 Annual Report
 2018
 2017
 2016
 2015
 2014
Operating Revenues (in millions):         
Wholesale — non-affiliates$1,757
 $1,671
 $1,146
 $964
 $1,116
Wholesale — affiliates435
 392
 419
 417
 383
Total revenues from sales of electricity2,192
 2,063
 1,565
 1,381
 1,499
Other revenues13
 12
 12
 9
 2
Total$2,205
 $2,075
 $1,577
 $1,390
 $1,501
Net Income Attributable to
   Southern Power (in millions)(a)
$187
 $1,071
 $338
 $215
 $172
Cash Dividends
   on Common Stock (in millions)
$312
 $317
 $272
 $131
 $131
Return on Average Common Equity (percent)(a)
4.62
 22.39
 9.79
 10.16
 10.39
Total Assets (in millions)(b)
$14,883
 $15,206
 $15,169
 $8,905
 $5,233
Property, Plant, and Equipment
   In Service (in millions)
$13,271
 $13,755
 $12,728
 $7,275
 $5,657
Capitalization (in millions):         
Common stockholders' equity$2,968
 $5,138
 $4,430
 $2,483
 $1,752
Noncontrolling interests4,316
 1,360
 1,245
 781
 219
Redeemable noncontrolling interests
 
 164
 43
 39
Long-term debt(b)
4,418
 5,071
 5,068
 2,719
 1,085
Total (excluding amounts due within one year)$11,702
 $11,569
 $10,907
 $6,026
 $3,095
Capitalization Ratios (percent):         
Common stockholders' equity25.4
 44.4
 40.6
 41.2
 56.6
Noncontrolling interests36.9
 11.8
 11.4
 13.0
 7.1
Redeemable noncontrolling interests
 
 1.5
 0.7
 1.3
Long-term debt(b)
37.7
 43.8
 46.5
 45.1
 35.0
Total (excluding amounts due within one year)100.0
 100.0
 100.0
 100.0
 100.0
Kilowatt-Hour Sales (in millions):         
Wholesale — non-affiliates37,164
 35,920
 23,213
 18,544
 19,014
Wholesale — affiliates12,603
 12,811
 15,950
 16,567
 11,194
Total49,767
 48,731
 39,163
 35,111
 30,208
Plant Nameplate Capacity
   Ratings (year-end) (megawatts)
11,888
 12,940
 12,442
 9,808
 9,185
Maximum Peak-Hour Demand (megawatts):         
Winter2,867
 3,421
 3,469
 3,923
 3,999
Summer4,210
 4,224
 4,303
 4,249
 3,998
Annual Load Factor (percent)52.2
 49.1
 50.0
 49.0
 51.8
Plant Availability (percent)99.9
 99.9
 91.6
 93.1
 91.8
Source of Energy Supply (percent):         
Natural gas68.1
 67.7
 79.4
 89.5
 86.0
Solar, Wind, and Biomass23.6
 22.8
 12.1
 4.3
 2.9
Purchased power —         
From non-affiliates6.6
 7.8
 6.8
 4.7
 6.4
From affiliates1.7
 1.7
 1.7
 1.5
 4.7
Total100.0
 100.0
 100.0
 100.0
 100.0
Employees (year-end)(c)
491
 541
 
 
 
(a)As a result of the Tax Reform Legislation, Southern Power recorded an income tax expense (benefit) of $79 million and $(743) million in 2018 and 2017, respectively.
(b)A reclassification of debt issuance costs from Total Assets to Long-term debt of $11 million and a reclassification of deferred tax assets from Total Assets to Accumulated deferred income taxes of $306 million is reflected for 2014, in accordance with new accounting standards adopted in 2015 and applied retrospectively.
(c)Prior to December 2017, Southern Power had no employees but was billed for employee-related costs from SCS.

SELECTED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL AND OPERATING DATA 2014-2018
Southern Company Gas and Subsidiary Companies 2018 Annual Report
 
Successor(a)
  
Predecessor(a)
 
2018(b)
 2017 July 1, 2016 through December 31, 2016  January 1, 2016 through June 30, 2016 2015 2014
Operating Revenues (in millions)$3,909
 $3,920
 $1,652
  $1,905
 $3,941
 $5,385
Net Income Attributable to
Southern Company Gas
(in millions)
(c)
$372
 $243
 $114
  $131
 $353
 $482
Cash Dividends on Common Stock
(in millions)
$468
 $443
 $126
  $128
 $244
 $233
Return on Average Common Equity
(percent)
(c)
4.23
 2.68
 1.74
  3.31
 9.05
 12.96
Total Assets (in millions)$21,448
 $22,987
 $21,853
  $14,488
 $14,754
 $14,888
Gross Property Additions
(in millions)
$1,399
 $1,525
 $632
  $548
 $1,027
 $769
Capitalization (in millions):            
Common stockholders' equity$8,570
 $9,022
 $9,109
  $3,933
 $3,975
 $3,828
Long-term debt5,583
 5,891
 5,259
  3,709
 3,275
 3,581
Total (excluding amounts due within
one year)
$14,153
 $14,913
 $14,368
  $7,642
 $7,250
 $7,409
Capitalization Ratios (percent):            
Common stockholders' equity60.6
 60.5
 63.4
  51.5
 54.8
 51.7
Long-term debt39.4
 39.5
 36.6
  48.5
 45.2
 48.3
Total (excluding amounts due within
one year)
100.0
 100.0
 100.0
  100.0
 100.0
 100.0
Service Contracts (period-end)
 1,184,257
 1,198,263
  1,197,096
 1,205,476
 1,162,065
Customers (period-end)            
Gas distribution operations4,247,804
 4,623,249
 4,586,477
  4,544,489
 4,557,729
 4,529,114
Gas marketing services697,384
 773,984
 655,999
  630,475
 654,475
 633,460
Total4,945,188
 5,397,233
 5,242,476
  5,174,964
 5,212,204
 5,162,574
Employees (period-end)4,389
 5,318
 5,292
  5,284
 5,203
 5,165
(a)As a result of the Merger, pushdown accounting was applied to create a new cost basis for Southern Company Gas' assets, liabilities, and equity as of the acquisition date. Accordingly, the successor financial statements reflect the new basis of accounting, and successor and predecessor period financial results are presented but are not comparable.
(b)During 2018, Southern Company Gas completed the Southern Company Gas Dispositions. See Note 15 to the financial statements under "Southern Company Gas" in Item 8 herein for additional information.
(c)
As a result of the Tax Reform Legislation, Southern Company Gas recorded income tax expense (benefit) of $(3) million and $93 million in 2018 and 2017, respectively.


SELECTED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL AND OPERATING DATA 2014-2018 (continued)
Southern Company Gas and Subsidiary Companies 2018 Annual Report
 
Successor(a)
  
Predecessor(a)
 
2018(b)
 2017 July 1, 2016 through December 31, 2016  January 1, 2016 through June 30, 2016 2015 2014
Operating Revenues (in millions)            
Residential$1,886
 $2,100
 $899
  $1,101
 $2,129
 $2,877
Commercial546
 641
 260
  310
 617
 861
Transportation944
 811
 269
  290
 526
 458
Industrial140
 159
 74
  72
 203
 242
Other393
 209
 150
  132
 466
 947
Total$3,909
 $3,920
 $1,652
  $1,905
 $3,941
 $5,385
Heating Degree Days:            
Illinois6,101
 5,246
 1,903
  3,340
 5,433
 6,556
Georgia2,588
 1,970
 727
  1,448
 2,204
 2,882
Gas Sales Volumes
(mmBtu in millions):
            
Gas distribution operations            
Firm721
 667
 274
  396
 695
 766
Interruptible95
 95
 47
  49
 99
 106
Total816
 762
 321
  445
 794
 872
Gas marketing services            
Firm:            
Georgia37
 32
 13
  21
 35
 41
Illinois13
 12
 4
  8
 13
 17
Other20
 18
 5
  7
 11
 10
Interruptible large commercial and
industrial
14
 14
 6
  8
 14
 17
Total84
 76
 28
  44
 73
 85
Market share in Georgia (percent)29.0
 29.2
 29.4
  29.3
 29.7
 30.6
Wholesale gas services            
Daily physical sales (mmBtu in
millions/day
)
6.7
 6.4
 7.2
  7.6
 6.8
 6.3
(a)As a result of the Merger, pushdown accounting was applied to create a new cost basis for Southern Company Gas' assets, liabilities, and equity as of the acquisition date. Accordingly, the successor financial statements reflect the new basis of accounting, and successor and predecessor period financial results are presented but are not comparable.
(b)During 2018, Southern Company Gas completed the Southern Company Gas Dispositions. See Note 15 to the financial statements under "Southern Company Gas" in Item 8 herein for additional information.


Item 7.MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
Southern Company and Subsidiary Companies 2018 Annual Report



OVERVIEW
Business Activities
Southern Company is a holding company that owns all of the common stock of the traditional electric operating companies and the parent entities of Southern Power and Southern Company Gas and owns other direct and indirect subsidiaries. The primary businesses of the Southern Company system are electricity sales by the traditional electric operating companies and Southern Power and the distribution of natural gas by Southern Company Gas.
The traditional electric operating companies are vertically integrated utilities providing electric service in three Southeastern states as of January 1, 2019. On January 1, 2019, Southern Company completed its sale of Gulf Power to NextEra Energy for an aggregate cash purchase price of approximately $5.8 billion (less $1.3 billion of indebtedness assumed), subject to customary working capital adjustments. At December 31, 2018, the assets and liabilities of Gulf Power were classified as held for sale on Southern Company's balance sheet. Unless otherwise noted, the disclosures herein related to specific asset and liability balances at December 31, 2018 exclude assets and liabilities held for sale. See Note 15 under "Assets Held for Sale" for additional information. A preliminary gain of $2.5 billion pre-tax ($1.3 billion after tax) associated with the sale of Gulf Power is expected to be recorded in 2019.
Southern Power develops, constructs, acquires, owns, and manages power generation assets, including renewable energy projects, and sells electricity at market-based rates in the wholesale market. On May 22, 2018, Southern Power sold a noncontrolling 33% equity interest in SP Solar, a limited partnership indirectly owning substantially all of Southern Power's solar facilities, for approximately $1.2 billion and, on December 11, 2018, Southern Power sold a noncontrolling tax equity interest in SP Wind, a holding company owning a portfolio of eight operating wind facilities, for approximately $1.2 billion. On November 5, 2018, Southern Power entered into an agreement to sell all of its equity interests in Plant Mankato (including the 385-MW expansion currently under construction) for an aggregate purchase price of approximately $650 million, which is expected to close mid-2019. The ultimate outcome of this matter cannot be determined at this time.
Southern Company Gas distributes natural gas through its natural gas distribution utilities and is involved in several other complementary businesses including gas pipeline investments, wholesale gas services, and gas marketing services. In July 2018, Southern Company Gas completed sales of three of its natural gas distribution utilities.
See FUTURE EARNINGS POTENTIAL – "General" herein and Note 15 to the financial statements for additional information regarding disposition activities.
Many factors affect the opportunities, challenges, and risks of the Southern Company system's electricity and natural gas businesses. These factors include the ability to maintain constructive regulatory environments, to maintain and grow sales and customers, and to effectively manage and secure timely recovery of costs. These costs include those related to projected long-term demand growth, stringent environmental standards, including CCR rules, reliability, fuel, restoration following major storms, and capital expenditures, including constructing new electric generating plants, expanding and improving the electric transmission and distribution systems, and updating and expanding the natural gas distribution systems.
The traditional electric operating companies and natural gas distribution utilities have various regulatory mechanisms that operate to address cost recovery. Effectively operating pursuant to these regulatory mechanisms and appropriately balancing required costs and capital expenditures with customer prices will continue to challenge the Southern Company system for the foreseeable future. See Note 2 to the financial statements for additional information.
In 2018, Alabama Power, Georgia Power, Mississippi Power, Atlanta Gas Light, and Nicor Gas reached agreements with their respective state PSCs or other applicable state regulatory agencies relating to the regulatory impacts of the Tax Reform Legislation, which, for some companies, included capital structure adjustments expected to help mitigate the potential adverse impacts to certain of their credit metrics. See Note 2 to the financial statements for additional information regarding state PSC or other regulatory agency actions related to the Tax Reform Legislation. Also see MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS – FUTURE EARNINGS POTENTIAL – "Income Tax Matters" and FINANCIAL CONDITION AND LIQUIDITY – "Credit Rating Risk" herein and Note 10 to the financial statements for information regarding the Tax Reform Legislation.
Another major factor affecting the Southern Company system's businesses is the profitability of the competitive market-based wholesale generating business. Southern Power's strategy is to create value through various transactions including acquisitions, dispositions, and sales of partnership interests, development and construction of new generating facilities, and entry into PPAs primarily with investor-owned utilities, IPPs, municipalities, electric cooperatives, and other load-serving entities, as well as commercial and industrial customers. In general, Southern Power commits to the construction or acquisition of new generating capacity only after entering into or assuming long-term PPAs for the new facilities.

MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS (continued)
Southern Company and Subsidiary Companies 2018 Annual Report


Southern Company's other business activities include providing energy solutions, including distributed energy infrastructure, energy efficiency products and services, and utility infrastructure services, to customers. Other business activities also include investments in telecommunications, leveraged lease projects, and gas storage facilities. Management continues to evaluate the contribution of each of these activities to total shareholder return and may pursue acquisitions, dispositions, and other strategic ventures or investments accordingly.
In striving to achieve attractive risk-adjusted returns while providing cost-effective energy to more than eight million electric and gas utility customers, the Southern Company system continues to focus on several key performance indicators. These indicators include, but are not limited to, customer satisfaction, plant availability, electric and natural gas system reliability, execution of major construction projects, and earnings per share (EPS). Southern Company's financial success is directly tied to customer satisfaction. Key elements of ensuring customer satisfaction include outstanding service, high reliability, and competitive prices. Management uses customer satisfaction surveys and reliability indicators to evaluate the results of the Southern Company system.
See RESULTS OF OPERATIONS herein for information on Southern Company's financial performance.
Plant Vogtle Units 3 and 4 Status
In 2009, the Georgia PSC certified construction of Plant Vogtle Units 3 and 4 (with electric generating capacity of approximately 1,100 MWs each). Georgia Power holds a 45.7% ownership interest in Plant Vogtle Units 3 and 4. In March 2017, the EPC Contractor filed for bankruptcy protection under Chapter 11 of the U.S. Bankruptcy Code. In December 2017, the Georgia PSC approved Georgia Power's recommendation to continue construction. The current expected in-service dates remain November 2021 for Unit 3 and November 2022 for Unit 4.
In the second quarter 2018, Georgia Power revised its base capital cost forecast and estimated contingency to complete construction and start-up of Plant Vogtle Units 3 and 4 to $8.0 billion and $0.4 billion, respectively, for a total project capital cost forecast of $8.4 billion (net of $1.7 billion received under the Guarantee Settlement Agreement and approximately $188 million in related Customer Refunds), with respect to Georgia Power's ownership interest. Although Georgia Power believes these incremental costs are reasonable and necessary to complete the project and the Georgia PSC's order in the seventeenth VCM proceeding specifically states that the construction of Plant Vogtle Units 3 and 4 is not subject to a cost cap, Georgia Power did not seek rate recovery for the $0.7 billion increase in costs included in the current base capital cost forecast (or any related financing costs) in the nineteenth VCM report that was approved by the Georgia PSC on February 19, 2019. In connection with future VCM filings, Georgia Power may request the Georgia PSC to evaluate costs currently included in the construction contingency estimate for rate recovery as and when they are appropriately included in the base capital cost forecast. After considering the significant level of uncertainty that exists regarding the future recoverability of costs included in the construction contingency estimate since the ultimate outcome of these matters is subject to the outcome of future assessments by management, as well as Georgia PSC decisions in these future regulatory proceedings, Georgia Power recorded a total pre-tax charge to income of $1.1 billion ($0.8 billion after tax) in the second quarter 2018.
As a result of the increase in the total project capital cost forecast and Georgia Power's decision not to seek rate recovery of the increase in the base capital costs, the holders of at least 90% of the ownership interests in Plant Vogtle Units 3 and 4 were required to vote to continue construction. On September 26, 2018, the Vogtle Owners unanimously voted to continue construction of Plant Vogtle Units 3 and 4. In connection with the vote to continue construction, Georgia Power entered into (i) a binding term sheet (Vogtle Owner Term Sheet) with the other Vogtle Owners and certain of MEAG's wholly-owned subsidiaries, including MEAG Power SPVJ, LLC (MEAG SPVJ), to take certain actions which partially mitigate potential financial exposure for the other Vogtle Owners and (ii) a term sheet (MEAG Term Sheet) with MEAG and MEAG SPVJ to provide funding with respect to MEAG SPVJ's ownership interest in Plant Vogtle Units 3 and 4 under certain circumstances. On January 14, 2019, Georgia Power, MEAG, and MEAG SPVJ entered into an agreement to implement the provisions of the MEAG Term Sheet. On February 18, 2019, Georgia Power, the other Vogtle Owners, and certain of MEAG's wholly-owned subsidiaries entered into certain amendments to their joint ownership agreements to implement the provisions of the Vogtle Owner Term Sheet.
The ultimate outcome of these matters cannot be determined at this time.
See FUTURE EARNINGS POTENTIAL – "Construction ProgramNuclear Construction" herein for additional information on Plant Vogtle Units 3 and 4.
Earnings
Consolidated net income attributable to Southern Company was $2.2 billion in 2018, an increase of $1.4 billion, or 164.4%, from the prior year. The increase was primarily due to charges of $3.4 billion ($2.4 billion after tax) in 2017 related to the Kemper IGCC at Mississippi Power, partially offset by a $1.1 billion ($0.8 billion after tax) charge in the second quarter 2018 for an

MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS (continued)
Southern Company and Subsidiary Companies 2018 Annual Report


estimated probable loss on Georgia Power's construction of Plant Vogtle Units 3 and 4. The increase also reflects lower federal income tax expense as a result of the Tax Reform Legislation, partially offset by impairment charges, primarily associated with asset sales at Southern Power and Southern Company Gas.
Consolidated net income attributable to Southern Company was $842 million in 2017, a decrease of $1.6 billion, or 65.6%, from the prior year. The decrease was primarily due to pre-tax charges of $3.4 billion ($2.4 billion after tax) related to the Kemper IGCC at Mississippi Power. Also contributing to the change were increases of $240 million in net income from Southern Company Gas (excluding the impact of $111 million in additional expense related to the Tax Reform Legislation) reflecting the 12-month period in 2017 compared to the six-month period following the Merger closing on July 1, 2016, $264 million related to net tax benefits from the Tax Reform Legislation, higher retail electric revenues resulting from increases in base rates partially offset by milder weather and lower customer usage, and increases in renewable energy sales at Southern Power. These increases were partially offset by higher interest and depreciation and amortization.
See Note 15 to the financial statements under "Southern Company Merger with Southern Company Gas" for additional information regarding the Merger.
Basic EPS was $2.18 in 2018, $0.84 in 2017, and $2.57 in 2016. Diluted EPS, which factors in additional shares related to stock-based compensation, was $2.17 in 2018, $0.84 in 2017, and $2.55 in 2016. EPS for 2018, 2017, and 2016 was negatively impacted by $0.04, $0.04, and $0.12 per share, respectively, as a result of increases in the average shares outstanding. See FINANCIAL CONDITION AND LIQUIDITY – "Financing Activities" herein for additional information.
Dividends
Southern Company has paid dividends on its common stock since 1948. Dividends paid per share of common stock were $2.38 in 2018, $2.30 in 2017, and $2.22 in 2016. In January 2019, Southern Company declared a quarterly dividend of 60 cents per share. This is the 285th consecutive quarter that Southern Company has paid a dividend equal to or higher than the previous quarter. For 2018, the dividend payout ratio was 109% compared to 273% for 2017. The decrease was due to an increase in earnings in 2018 resulting from charges related to the Kemper IGCC in 2017, partially offset by the charge related to construction of Plant Vogtle Units 3 and 4 in 2018. See "Earnings" and RESULTS OF OPERATIONS – "Electricity BusinessEstimated Loss on Projects Under Construction" herein and Note 2 to the financial statements under "Georgia PowerNuclear Construction" and "Mississippi PowerKemper County Energy Facility" for additional information.
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
Discussion of the results of operations is divided into three parts – the Southern Company system's primary business of electricity sales, its gas business, and its other business activities.
 2018 2017 2016
 (in millions)
Electricity business$2,304
 $878
 $2,571
Gas business372
 243
 114
Other business activities(450) (279) (237)
Net Income$2,226
 $842
 $2,448

MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS (continued)
Southern Company and Subsidiary Companies 2018 Annual Report


Electricity Business
Southern Company's electric utilities generate and sell electricity to retail and wholesale customers. The results of operations discussed below include the results of Gulf Power through December 31, 2018. See Note 15 to the financial statements under "Southern Company's Sale of Gulf Power" for additional information.
A condensed statement of income for the electricity business follows:
 Amount 
Increase (Decrease)
from Prior Year
 2018 2018 2017
 (in millions)
Electric operating revenues$18,571
 $31
 $599
Fuel4,637
 237
 39
Purchased power971

108
 113
Cost of other sales66
 (3) 11
Other operations and maintenance4,635
 45
 (76)
Depreciation and amortization2,565
 108
 224
Taxes other than income taxes1,098
 35
 24
Estimated loss on plants under construction1,097
 (2,265) 2,934
Impairment charges156
 156
 
Gain on dispositions, net
 40
 (41)
Total electric operating expenses15,225
 (1,539) 3,228
Operating income3,346
 1,570
 (2,629)
Allowance for equity funds used during construction131
 (21) (48)
Interest expense, net of amounts capitalized1,035
 24
 80
Other income (expense), net144
 17
 58
Income taxes207
 125
 (1,009)
Net income2,379
 1,417
 (1,690)
Less:     
Dividends on preferred and preference stock of subsidiaries16
 (22) (7)
Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests59
 13
 10
Net Income Attributable to Southern Company$2,304
 $1,426
 $(1,693)

MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS (continued)
Southern Company and Subsidiary Companies 2018 Annual Report


Electric Operating Revenues
Electric operating revenues for 2018 were $18.6 billion, reflecting a $31 million increase from 2017. Details of electric operating revenues were as follows:
 2018 2017
 (in millions)
Retail electric — prior year$15,330
 $15,234
Estimated change resulting from —   
Rates and pricing(773) 508
Sales growth (decline)84
 (71)
Weather300
 (281)
Fuel and other cost recovery281
 (60)
Retail electric — current year15,222
 15,330
Wholesale electric revenues2,516
 2,426
Other electric revenues664
 681
Other revenues169
 103
Electric operating revenues$18,571
 $18,540
Percent change0.2% 3.3%
Retail electric revenues decreased $108 million, or 0.7%, in 2018 as compared to the prior year. The significant factors driving this change are shown in the preceding table. The decrease in rates and pricing in 2018 was primarily due to revenues deferred as regulatory liabilities for customer bill credits related to the Tax Reform Legislation and expected customer refunds at Alabama Power and Georgia Power.
Retail electric revenues increased $96 million, or 0.6%, in 2017 as compared to the prior year. The significant factors driving this change are shown in the preceding table. The increase in rates and pricing in 2017 was primarily due to a Rate RSE increase at Alabama Power effective in January 2017, the recovery of Plant Vogtle Units 3 and 4 construction financing costs under the NCCR tariff at Georgia Power, and an increase in retail base rates effective July 2017 at Gulf Power.
See Note 2 to the financial statements under "Southern CompanyGulf Power," "Alabama PowerRate RSE" and " – Rate CNP Compliance," "Georgia PowerRate Plans," and " – Nuclear Construction" for additional information. Also see "Energy Sales" below for a discussion of changes in the volume of energy sold, including changes related to sales growth (decline) and weather.
Electric rates for the traditional electric operating companies include provisions to adjust billings for fluctuations in fuel costs, including the energy component of purchased power costs. Under these provisions, fuel revenues generally equal fuel expenses, including the energy component of PPA costs, and do not affect net income. The traditional electric operating companies each have one or more regulatory mechanisms to recover other costs such as environmental and other compliance costs, storm damage, new plants, and PPA capacity costs.
Wholesale electric revenues consist of PPAs and short-term opportunity sales. Wholesale electric revenues from PPAs (other than solar and wind PPAs) have both capacity and energy components. Capacity revenues generally represent the greatest contribution to net income and are designed to provide recovery of fixed costs plus a return on investment. Energy revenues will vary depending on fuel prices, the market prices of wholesale energy compared to the Southern Company system's generation, demand for energy within the Southern Company system's electric service territory, and the availability of the Southern Company system's generation. Increases and decreases in energy revenues that are driven by fuel prices are accompanied by an increase or decrease in fuel costs and do not have a significant impact on net income. Energy sales from solar and wind PPAs do not have a capacity charge and customers either purchase the energy output of a dedicated renewable facility through an energy charge or through a fixed price related to the energy. As a result, the ability to recover fixed and variable operations and maintenance expenses is dependent upon the level of energy generated from these facilities, which can be impacted by weather conditions, equipment performance, transmission constraints, and other factors. Wholesale electric revenues at Mississippi Power include FERC-regulated MRA sales as well as market-based sales. Short-term opportunity sales are made at market-based rates that generally provide a margin above the Southern Company system's variable cost to produce the energy.

MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS (continued)
Southern Company and Subsidiary Companies 2018 Annual Report


Wholesale electric revenues from power sales were as follows:
 2018 2017 2016
 (in millions)
Capacity and other$620
 $642
 $570
Energy1,896
 1,784
 1,356
Total$2,516
 $2,426
 $1,926
In 2018, wholesale revenues increased $90 million, or 3.7%, as compared to the prior year due to a $112 million increase in energy revenues, partially offset by a $22 million decrease in capacity revenues. The increase in energy revenues was primarily related to Southern Power and includes new PPAs related to existing natural gas facilities, new renewable facilities, and an increase in the volume of KWHs sold at existing renewable facilities, partially offset by a decrease in non-PPA revenues from short-term sales. The decrease in capacity revenues was primarily due to the expiration of a wholesale contract in the fourth quarter 2017 at Georgia Power.
In 2017, wholesale revenues increased $500 million, or 26.0%, as compared to the prior year due to a $428 million increase in energy revenues and a $72 million increase in capacity revenues, primarily at Southern Power. The increase in energy revenues was primarily due to increases in renewable energy sales arising from new solar and wind facilities and non-PPA revenues from short-term sales. The increase in capacity revenues was primarily due to a PPA related to new natural gas facilities and additional customer capacity requirements.
Other Electric Revenues
Other electric revenues decreased $17 million, or 2.5%, in 2018 as compared to the prior year. The decrease is primarily related to a decrease in open access transmission tariff revenues, largely due to a lower rate related to the Tax Reform Legislation. Other electric revenues decreased $17 million, or 2.4%, in 2017, as compared to the prior year. The decrease reflects a $15 million decrease in open access transmission tariff revenues, primarily as a result of the expiration of long-term transmission services contracts at Georgia Power.
Energy Sales
Changes in revenues are influenced heavily by the change in the volume of energy sold from year to year. KWH sales for 2018 and the percent change from the prior year were as follows:
 
Total
KWHs
 
Total KWH
Percent Change
 
Weather-Adjusted
Percent Change
 2018 2018 2017 2018 2017
 (in billions)        
Residential54.6
 8.0 % (5.3)% 1.2 % (0.3)%
Commercial53.5
 2.1
 (2.6) 0.5
 (0.9)
Industrial53.3
 1.1
 
 1.1
 
Other0.8
 (5.5) (4.0) (5.7) (3.9)
Total retail162.2
 3.6
 (2.6) 0.9 % (0.4)%
Wholesale49.9
 1.9
 32.4
    
Total energy sales212.1
 3.2 % 3.9 %    
Changes in retail energy sales are generally the result of changes in electricity usage by customers, changes in weather, and changes in the number of customers. Retail energy sales increased 5.7 billion KWHs in 2018 as compared to the prior year. This increase was primarily due to colder weather in the first quarter 2018 and warmer weather in the second and third quarters 2018 compared to the corresponding periods in 2017. Weather-adjusted residential KWH sales increased primarily due to customer growth. Weather-adjusted commercial KWH sales increased primarily due to customer growth, partially offset by decreased customer usage resulting from customer initiatives in energy savings and an ongoing migration to the electronic commerce business model. Industrial KWH energy sales increased primarily due to increased sales in the primary metals sector, partially offset by decreased sales in the paper sector.
Retail energy sales decreased 4.2 billion KWHs in 2017 as compared to the prior year. This decrease was primarily due to milder weather and decreased customer usage, partially offset by customer growth. Weather-adjusted residential KWH sales decreased

MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS (continued)
Southern Company and Subsidiary Companies 2018 Annual Report


primarily due to decreased customer usage resulting from an increase in penetration of energy-efficient residential appliances and an increase in multi-family housing, partially offset by customer growth. Weather-adjusted commercial KWH sales decreased primarily due to decreased customer usage resulting from customer initiatives in energy savings and an ongoing migration to the electronic commerce business model, partially offset by customer growth. Industrial KWH energy sales were flat primarily due to decreased sales in the paper, stone, clay, and glass, transportation, and chemicals sectors, offset by increased sales in the primary metals and textile sectors. Additionally, Hurricane Irma negatively impacted customer usage for all customer classes.
See "Electric Operating Revenues" above for a discussion of significant changes in wholesale revenues related to changes in price and KWH sales.
Other Revenues
Other revenues increased $66 million, or 64.1%, in 2018 as compared to the prior year. The increase was primarily due to unregulated sales of products and services that were reclassified from other income (expense), net as a result of the adoption of ASC 606, Revenue from Contracts with Customers (ASC 606). See Note 1 to the financial statements for additional information regarding the adoption of ASC 606.
Other revenues increased $20 million in 2017 as compared to the prior year. The increase was primarily due to additional third party infrastructure services.
Fuel and Purchased Power Expenses
The mix of fuel sources for the generation of electricity is determined primarily by demand, the unit cost of fuel consumed, and the availability of generating units. Additionally, the electric utilities purchase a portion of their electricity needs from the wholesale market.
Details of the Southern Company system's generation and purchased power were as follows:
 2018 2017 2016
Total generation (in billions of KWHs)
200
 194
 188
Total purchased power (in billions of KWHs)
21
 20
 19
Sources of generation (percent) —
     
Gas46
 46
 46
Coal30
 30
 33
Nuclear15
 16
 16
Hydro3
 2
 2
Other6
 6
 3
Cost of fuel, generated (in cents per net KWH)(a) 
     
Gas2.89
 2.79
 2.48
Coal2.80
 2.81
 3.04
Nuclear0.80
 0.79
 0.81
Average cost of fuel, generated (in cents per net KWH)(a)
2.50
 2.44
 2.40
Average cost of purchased power (in cents per net KWH)(b)
5.46
 5.19
 4.81
(a)For 2018, cost of fuel, generated and average cost of fuel, generated excludes a $30 million adjustment associated with a May 2018 Alabama PSC accounting order related to excess deferred income taxes.
(b)Average cost of purchased power includes fuel purchased by the Southern Company system for tolling agreements where power is generated by the provider.
In 2018, total fuel and purchased power expenses were $5.6 billion, an increase of $345 million, or 6.6%, as compared to the prior year. The increase was primarily the result of a $178 million increase in the volume of KWHs generated and purchased primarily due to colder weather in the first quarter 2018 and warmer weather in the second and third quarters 2018 compared to the corresponding periods in 2017 and a $137 million increase in the average cost of fuel and purchased power primarily due to higher natural gas prices.
In addition, fuel expense increased $30 million in 2018 as a result of an Alabama PSC accounting order authorizing the amortization of a regulatory liability to offset under recovered fuel costs. See FUTURE EARNINGS POTENTIAL – "Regulatory Matters – Alabama Power – Tax Reform Accounting Order" herein for additional information.

MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS (continued)
Southern Company and Subsidiary Companies 2018 Annual Report


In 2017, total fuel and purchased power expenses were $5.3 billion, an increase of $152 million, or 3.0%, as compared to the prior year. The increase was primarily the result of a $196 million increase in the average cost of fuel and purchased power primarily due to higher natural gas prices, partially offset by a $44 million net decrease in the volume of KWHs generated and purchased.
Fuel and purchased power energy transactions at the traditional electric operating companies are generally offset by fuel revenues and do not have a significant impact on net income. See FUTURE EARNINGS POTENTIAL – "Regulatory MattersFuel Cost Recovery" herein for additional information. Fuel expenses incurred under Southern Power's PPAs are generally the responsibility of the counterparties and do not significantly impact net income.
Fuel
In 2018, fuel expense was $4.6 billion, an increase of $237 million, or 5.4%, as compared to the prior year. The increase was primarily due to a 3.6% increase in the average cost of natural gas per KWH generated, a 3.5% increase in the volume of KWHs generated by coal, and a 2.8% increase in the volume of KWHs generated by natural gas.
In 2017, fuel expense was $4.4 billion, an increase of $39 million, or 0.9%, as compared to the prior year. The increase was primarily due to a 12.5% increase in the average cost of natural gas per KWH generated and a 2.8% increase in the volume of KWHs generated by natural gas, partially offset by a 7.9% decrease in the volume of KWHs generated by coal and a 7.6% decrease in the average cost of coal per KWH generated.
Purchased Power
In 2018, purchased power expense was $971 million, an increase of $108 million, or 12.5%, as compared to the prior year. The increase was primarily due to a 5.2% increase in the average cost per KWH purchased, primarily as a result of higher natural gas prices, and a 5.2% increase in the volume of KWHs purchased.
In 2017, purchased power expense was $863 million, an increase of $113 million, or 15.1%, as compared to the prior year. The increase was primarily due to a 7.9% increase in the average cost per KWH purchased, primarily as a result of higher natural gas prices, and a 5.0% increase in the volume of KWHs purchased.
Energy purchases will vary depending on demand for energy within the Southern Company system's electric service territory, the market prices of wholesale energy as compared to the cost of the Southern Company system's generation, and the availability of the Southern Company system's generation.
Other Operations and Maintenance Expenses
Other operations and maintenance expenses increased $45 million, or 1.0%, in 2018 as compared to the prior year. The increase was primarily due to a $74 million increase in transmission and distribution costs, primarily related to additional vegetation management at Georgia Power, and $74 million in expenses from unregulated sales of products and services that were reclassified to other operations and maintenance expenses as a result of the adoption of ASC 606. In prior periods, these expenses were included in other income (expense), net. These increases were partially offset by a $32.5 million charge in the first quarter 2017 related to the write-down of Gulf Power's ownership of Plant Scherer Unit 3 in accordance with a rate case settlement agreement, a $30 million net decrease in employee compensation and benefits, including pension costs, largely due to a decrease in active medical costs at Alabama Power and a 2017 employee attrition plan at Georgia Power, and a $27 million decrease in customer accounts, service, and sales costs primarily due to cost-saving initiatives. See Note 1 to the financial statements for additional information regarding the adoption of ASC 606.
Other operations and maintenance expenses decreased $76 million, or 1.6%, in 2017 as compared to the prior year. The decrease was primarily due to cost containment and modernization activities implemented at Georgia Power that contributed to decreases of $85 million in generation maintenance costs, $46 million in transmission and distribution overhead line maintenance, $22 million in other employee compensation and benefits, and $22 million in customer accounts, service, and sales costs. Additionally, there was a $34 million decrease in scheduled outage and maintenance costs at generation facilities. These decreases were partially offset by a $56 million increase associated with new facilities at Southern Power, a $37 million increase in transmission and distribution costs primarily due to vegetation management at Alabama Power, and $32.5 million resulting from the write-down of Gulf Power's ownership of Plant Scherer Unit 3 in accordance with a rate case settlement agreement.
Production expenses and transmission and distribution expenses fluctuate from year to year due to variations in outage and maintenance schedules and normal changes in the cost of labor and materials.

MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS (continued)
Southern Company and Subsidiary Companies 2018 Annual Report


Depreciation and Amortization
Depreciation and amortization increased $108 million, or 4.4%, in 2018 as compared to the prior year. The increase was primarily related to additional plant in service. Additionally, the increase reflects $34 million in depreciation credits recognized in 2017, as authorized in Gulf Power's 2013 rate case settlement.
Depreciation and amortization increased $224 million, or 10.0%, in 2017 as compared to the prior year. The increase reflects $203 million related to additional plant in service at the traditional electric operating companies and Southern Power and a $13 million increase in amortization related to environmental compliance at Mississippi Power. The increase was partially offset by $34 million in depreciation credits recognized in accordance with Gulf Power's 2013 rate case settlement.
See Note 2 to the financial statements under "Southern CompanyRegulatory Assets and Liabilities" and Note 5 to the financial statements under "Depreciation and Amortization" for additional information.
Taxes Other Than Income Taxes
Taxes other than income taxes increased $35 million, or 3.3%, in 2018 as compared to the prior year primarily due to increased property taxes associated with higher assessed values and an increase in municipal franchise fees primarily related to higher retail revenues at Georgia Power.
Taxes other than income taxes increased $24 million, or 2.3%, in 2017 as compared to the prior year primarily due to an increase in property taxes due to new facilities at Southern Power.
Estimated Loss on Projects Under Construction
In the second quarter 2018, an estimated probable loss of $1.1 billion was recorded to reflect Georgia Power's revised estimate to complete construction and start-up of Plant Vogtle Units 3 and 4, which reflects the increase in costs included in the revised base capital cost forecast for which Georgia Power did not seek rate recovery and costs included in the revised construction contingency estimate for which Georgia Power may seek rate recovery as and when such costs are appropriately included in the base capital cost forecast. See Note 2 to the financial statements under "Georgia PowerNuclear Construction" for additional information.
Charges associated with the Kemper IGCC of $37 million, $3.4 billion, and $428 million were recorded in 2018, 2017, and 2016, respectively. The 2018 pre-tax charge of $37 million primarily resulted from the abandonment and related closure activities and ongoing period costs, net of sales proceeds, for the mine and gasifier-related assets at the Kemper County energy facility. On June 28, 2017, Mississippi Power suspended the gasifier portion of the project and recorded a charge to earnings for the remaining $2.8 billion book value of the gasifier portion of the project. Prior to the suspension, Mississippi Power recorded losses for revisions of estimated costs expected to be incurred on construction of the Kemper IGCC in excess of the $2.88 billion cost cap established by the Mississippi PSC, net of $245 million of grants awarded to the project by the DOE under the Clean Coal Power Initiative Round 2 and excluding the cost of the lignite mine and equipment, the cost of the CO2 pipeline facilities, AFUDC, and certain general exceptions. See Note 2 to the financial statements under "Mississippi PowerKemper County Energy Facility" for additional information.
Impairment Charges
In the second quarter 2018, Southern Power recorded a $119 million asset impairment charge in contemplation of the sale of Plant Oleander and Plant Stanton Unit A (together, the Florida Plants) and in the third quarter 2018 recorded a $36 million asset impairment charge on wind turbine equipment held for development projects. There were no asset impairment charges recorded in 2017 or 2016. See Note 15 to the financial statements under "Southern Power – Sales of Natural Gas Plants" and " – Development Projects" for additional information.
Gain on Dispositions, Net
Gain on dispositions, net decreased $40 million in 2018 and increased $41 million in 2017 as compared to the prior periods primarily due to gains on sales of assets at Georgia Power recorded in 2017.
Allowance for Equity Funds Used During Construction
AFUDC equity decreased $21 million, or 13.8%, in 2018 as compared to the prior year primarily due to Mississippi Power's suspension of the Kemper IGCC construction in June 2017, partially offset by a higher AFUDC rate resulting from a higher equity ratio and lower short-term borrowings at Georgia Power and a higher AFUDC base related to steam and transmission construction projects at Alabama Power.

MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS (continued)
Southern Company and Subsidiary Companies 2018 Annual Report


AFUDC equity decreased $48 million, or 24.0%, in 2017 as compared to the prior year primarily due to Mississippi Power's suspension of the Kemper IGCC in June 2017.
See Note 2 to the financial statements under "Mississippi PowerKemper County Energy Facility" for additional information.
Interest Expense, Net of Amounts Capitalized
Interest expense, net of amounts capitalized increased $24 million, or 2.4%, in 2018 as compared to the prior year. The increase was primarily related to Mississippi Power and reflects a $33 million net reduction in interest recorded in 2017 following a settlement with the IRS related to research and experimental deductions and a $29 million reduction in interest capitalized related to the Kemper IGCC suspension in June 2017. The increase also reflects an increase in outstanding borrowings and higher interest rates at Alabama Power, partially offset by a decrease in outstanding borrowings at Georgia Power. See Note 10 to the financial statements under "Section 174 Research and Experimental Deduction" for additional information.
Interest expense, net of amounts capitalized increased $80 million, or 8.6%, in 2017 as compared to the prior year primarily due to an increase in average outstanding long-term debt, primarily at Southern Power and Georgia Power, and a $37 million decrease in interest capitalized, primarily at Southern Power and Mississippi Power, partially offset by a net reduction of $33 million following Mississippi Power's settlement with the IRS related to research and experimental deductions. See Note 10 to the financial statements under "Unrecognized Tax Benefits" for additional information.
See Note 8 to the financial statements for additional information.
Other Income (Expense), Net
Other income (expense), net increased $17 million, or 13.4%, in 2018 as compared to the prior year primarily due to the settlement of Mississippi Power's Deepwater Horizon claim in May 2018 and a gain from a joint-development wind project at Southern Power, which is attributable to Southern Power's partner in the project and fully offset within noncontrolling interests, partially offset by an increase in charitable donations. See Note 3 to the financial statements under "General Litigation Matters– Mississippi Power" and Note 7 to the financial statements under "Southern Power" for additional information.
Other income (expense), net increased $58 million, or 84.1%, in 2017 as compared to the prior year primarily due to a decrease in non-service cost components of net periodic pension and other postretirement benefits costs, partially offset by increases in charitable donations. The change also includes an increase of $159 million in currency losses arising from a translation of euro-denominated fixed-rate notes into U.S. dollars, fully offset by an equal change in gains on the foreign currency hedges that were reclassified from accumulated OCI into earnings at Southern Power. See Note 1 under "Recently Adopted Accounting Standards" and Note 11 to the financial statements for additional information on net periodic pension and other postretirement benefit costs.
Income Taxes
Income taxes increased $125 million, or 152.4%, in 2018 as compared to the prior year. The increase was primarily due to an increase in pre-tax earnings, primarily resulting from charges recorded in 2017 related to the Kemper IGCC at Mississippi Power, partially offset by the estimated probable loss on Plant Vogtle Units 3 and 4 at Georgia Power recognized in the second quarter 2018. This increase was partially offset by lower federal income tax expense, as well as benefits from the flowback of excess deferred income taxes as a result of the Tax Reform Legislation.
Income taxes decreased $1.0 billion, or 92.5%, in 2017 as compared to the prior year primarily due to $809 million in tax benefits related to estimated losses on the Kemper IGCC at Mississippi Power and $346 million in net tax benefits resulting from the Tax Reform Legislation.
See Note 10 to the financial statements for additional information.
Dividends on Preferred and Preference Stock of Subsidiaries
Dividends on preferred and preference stock of subsidiaries decreased $22 million, or 57.9%, in 2018 as compared to 2017 and decreased $7 million, or 15.6%, in 2017 as compared to 2016. These decreases were primarily due to the 2017 redemptions of all outstanding shares of preferred and preference stock at Georgia Power and Gulf Power. See Note 8 to the financial statements for additional information.
Net Income Attributable to Noncontrolling Interests
Substantially all noncontrolling interests relate to renewable projects at Southern Power. Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests increased $13 million, or 28.3%, in 2018, as compared to the prior year. The increase was primarily due to $20 million of net income allocations due to the sale of a noncontrolling 33% equity interest in SP Solar in 2018 and $14

MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS (continued)
Southern Company and Subsidiary Companies 2018 Annual Report


million of other income allocations attributable to a joint-development wind project, partially offset by a reduction of $19 million due to HLBV income allocations between Southern Power and tax equity partners for partnerships entered into during 2018. In 2017, noncontrolling interests increased $10 million, or 28%, compared to 2016 primarily due to additional net income allocations from new solar partnerships.
See Note 15 under "Southern Power" for additional information.
Gas Business
Southern Company Gas distributes natural gas through utilities in four states and is involved in several other complementary businesses including gas pipeline investments, wholesale gas services, and gas marketing services.
A condensed statement of income for the gas business follows:
 Amount Increase (Decrease)
from Prior Year
 2018 2018 2017
 (in millions)
Operating revenues$3,909
 $(11) $2,268
Cost of natural gas1,539
 (62) 988
Cost of other sales12
 (17) 19
Other operations and maintenance981
 36
 424
Depreciation and amortization500
 (1) 263
Taxes other than income taxes211
 27
 113
Impairment charges42
 42
 
Gain on dispositions, net(291) (291) 
Total operating expenses2,994
 (266) 1,807
Operating income915
 255
 461
Earnings from equity method investments148
 42
 46
Interest expense, net of amounts capitalized228
 28
 119
Other income (expense), net1
 (43) 32
Income taxes464
 97
 291
Net income$372
 $129
 $129
In the table above, the 2018 changes for Southern Company Gas reflect the year ended December 31, 2018 compared to 2017. The Southern Company Gas Dispositions were completed by July 29, 2018 and represent the primary variance driver for the 2018 changes. Additional detailed variance explanations are provided herein. The 2017 changes reflect the 12-month period in 2017 compared to the six-month period following the Merger closing on July 1, 2016, which is the primary variance driver. Additionally, earnings from equity method investments include Southern Company Gas' acquisition of a 50% equity interest in SNG completed in September 2016. See Note 15 to the financial statements under "Southern Company Gas" for additional information on Southern Company Gas' investment in SNG and the Southern Company Gas Dispositions.
Seasonality of Results
During the period from November through March when natural gas usage and operating revenues are generally higher (Heating Season), more customers are connected to Southern Company Gas' distribution systems, and natural gas usage is higher in periods of colder weather. Occasionally in the summer, operating revenues are impacted due to peak usage by power generators in response to summer energy demands. Southern Company Gas' base operating expenses, excluding cost of natural gas, bad debt expense, and certain incentive compensation costs, are incurred relatively equally over any given year. Thus, operating results can vary significantly from quarter to quarter as a result of seasonality. For 2018, the percentage of operating revenues and net income generated during the Heating Season (January through March and November through December) were 68.7% and 96.0%, respectively. For 2017, the percentage of operating revenues and net income generated during the Heating Season were 67.3% and 73.7%, respectively. The 2017 net income generated during the Heating Season was significantly impacted by additional tax expense recorded in the fourth quarter resulting from the Tax Reform Legislation. See FUTURE EARNINGS POTENTIAL – "Income Tax MattersFederal Tax Reform Legislation" herein for additional information.

MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS (continued)
Southern Company and Subsidiary Companies 2018 Annual Report


Operating Revenues
Operating revenues in 2018 were $3.9 billion, reflecting an $11 million decrease from 2017. Details of operating revenues were as follows:
 (in millions) (% change)
Operating revenues – prior year$3,920
  
Estimated change resulting from –   
Infrastructure replacement programs and base rate changes31
 0.8
Gas costs and other cost recovery3
 0.1
Weather13
 0.3
Wholesale gas services138
 3.5
Southern Company Gas Dispositions(*)
(228) (5.8)
Other32
 0.8
Operating revenues – current year$3,909
 (0.3)%
(*)Includes a $154 million decrease related to natural gas revenues, including alternative revenue programs, and a $74 million decrease related to other revenues. See Note 15 to the financial statements under "Southern Company Gas" for additional information.
Revenues from infrastructure replacement programs and base rate changes increased in 2018 primarily due to a $48 million increase at Nicor Gas, partially offset by a $12 million decrease at Atlanta Gas Light. These amounts include the natural gas distribution utilities' continued investments recovered through infrastructure replacement programs and base rate increases less revenue reductions for the impacts of the Tax Reform Legislation. See Note 2 to the financial statements under "Southern Company Gas" for additional information.
Revenues increased due to colder weather, as determined by Heating Degree Days, in 2018 compared to 2017.
Revenues from wholesale gas services increased in 2018 primarily due to increased commercial activity, partially offset by derivative losses.
Other revenues increased in 2018 primarily due to a $15 million increase from the Dalton Pipeline being placed in service in August 2017 and a $14 million increase in Nicor Gas' revenue taxes.
Natural gas distribution rates include provisions to adjust billings for fluctuations in natural gas costs. Therefore, gas costs recovered through natural gas revenues generally equal the amount expensed in cost of natural gas and do not affect net income from the natural gas distribution utilities.
Cost of Natural Gas
Excluding Atlanta Gas Light, which does not sell natural gas to end-use customers, the natural gas distribution utilities charge their utility customers for natural gas consumed using natural gas cost recovery mechanisms set by the applicable state regulatory agencies. Under these mechanisms, all prudently-incurred natural gas costs are passed through to customers without markup, subject to regulatory review. The natural gas distribution utilities defer or accrue the difference between the actual cost of natural gas and the amount of commodity revenue earned in a given period. The deferred or accrued amount is either billed or refunded to customers prospectively through adjustments to the commodity rate. Deferred natural gas costs are reflected as regulatory assets and accrued natural gas costs are reflected as regulatory liabilities. Therefore, gas costs recovered through natural gas revenues generally equal the amount expensed in cost of natural gas and do not affect net income from the natural gas distribution utilities. Cost of natural gas at the natural gas distribution utilities represented 83.2% of the total cost of natural gas for 2018.
Gas marketing services customers are charged for actual and estimated natural gas consumed. Cost of natural gas includes the cost of fuel and associated transportation costs, lost and unaccounted for gas, adjustments to reduce the value of inventories to market value, if applicable, and gains and losses associated with certain derivatives.
Cost of natural gas in 2018 was $1.5 billion, a decrease of $62 million, or 3.9%, compared to 2017, which was substantially all as a result of the Southern Company Gas Dispositions.

MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS (continued)
Southern Company and Subsidiary Companies 2018 Annual Report


Cost of Other Sales
Cost of other sales in 2018 was $12 million, a decrease of $17 million, or 58.6%, compared to 2017 primarily related to the disposition of Pivotal Home Solutions.
Other Operations and Maintenance Expenses
Other operations and maintenance expenses increased $36 million, or 3.8%, in 2018 compared to the prior year. Excluding a $39 million decrease related to the Southern Company Gas Dispositions, other operations and maintenance expenses increased $75 million. This increase was primarily due to a $53 million increase in compensation and benefit costs, including a $12 million one-time increase for the adoption of a new paid time off policy to align with the Southern Company system, a $28 million increase in disposition-related costs, and an $11 million expense for a litigation settlement to facilitate the sale of Pivotal Home Solutions. These increases were partially offset by a $27 million decrease in bad debt expense primarily at Nicor Gas, which was offset by a decrease in revenues as a result of the related regulatory recovery mechanism. See Note 3 to the financial statements under "General Litigation Matters – Southern Company Gas" for additional information on the litigation settlement.
Depreciation and Amortization
Depreciation and amortization decreased $1 million, or 0.2%, in 2018 compared to the prior year. Excluding a $37 million decrease related to the Southern Company Gas Dispositions, depreciation and amortization increased $36 million. The increase was primarily due to continued infrastructure investments at the natural gas distribution utilities, partially offset by lower amortization of intangible assets as a result of fair value adjustments in acquisition accounting at gas marketing services. See Note 2 to the financial statements under "Southern Company Gas" for additional information on infrastructure replacement programs.
Taxes Other Than Income Taxes
Taxes other than income taxes increased $27 million, or 14.7%, in 2018 compared to the prior year. Excluding a $4 million decrease related to the Southern Company Gas Dispositions, taxes other than income taxes increased $31 million. This increase primarily reflects a $13 million increase in revenue tax expenses as a result of higher natural gas revenues, a $12 million increase in Nicor Gas' invested capital tax that reflects a $7 million credit in 2017 to establish a related regulatory asset, and a $4 million increase in property taxes. See Note 15 to the financial statements under "Southern Company Gas" for additional information on the Southern Company Gas Dispositions.
Impairment Charges
A goodwill impairment charge of $42 million was recorded in 2018 in contemplation of the sale of Pivotal Home Solutions. See Notes 1 and 15 to the financial statements under "Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets and Liabilities" and "Southern Company GasSale of Pivotal Home Solutions," respectively, for additional information.
Gain on Dispositions, Net
Gain on dispositions, net was $291 million in 2018 and was associated with the Southern Company Gas Dispositions. The income tax expense on these gains included income tax expense on goodwill not deductible for tax purposes and for which a deferred tax liability had not been recorded previously.
Earnings from Equity Method Investments
Earnings from equity method investments increased $42 million, or 39.6%, in 2018 compared to the prior year. The increase was primarily due to higher earnings from Southern Company Gas' equity method investment in SNG from new rates effective September 2018 and lower operations and maintenance expenses due to the timing of pipeline maintenance. See Note 7 to the financial statements under "Southern Company GasEquity Method Investments" for additional information.
Interest Expense, Net of Amounts Capitalized
Interest expense, net of amounts capitalized increased $28 million, or 14.0%, in 2018 compared to the prior year. The increase was primarily due to $21 million of additional interest expense related to new debt issuances and a $4 million reduction in capitalized interest primarily due to the Dalton Pipeline being placed in service in August 2017.
Other Income (Expense), Net
Other income (expense), net decreased $43 million, or 97.7%, in 2018 compared to the prior year. Excluding a $3 million decrease related to the Southern Company Gas Dispositions, other income (expense), net decreased $40 million. This decrease

MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS (continued)
Southern Company and Subsidiary Companies 2018 Annual Report


was primarily due to a $23 million increase in charitable donations and a $13 million decrease in gains from the settlement of contractor litigation claims. See Note 2 to the financial statements under "Southern Company GasInfrastructure Replacement Programs and Capital Projects– PRP" for additional information on the contractor litigation settlement.
Income Taxes
Income taxes increased $97 million, or 26.4%, in 2018 compared to the prior year. Excluding a $329 million increase related to the Southern Company Gas Dispositions, including tax expense on the goodwill for which a deferred tax liability had not been previously provided, income taxes decreased $232 million. This decrease was primarily due to a lower federal income tax rate and the flowback of excess deferred taxes as a result of the Tax Reform Legislation. In addition, 2017 included additional tax expense of $130 million from the revaluation of deferred tax assets associated with the Tax Reform Legislation, the enactment of the State of Illinois income tax legislation, and new income tax apportionment factors in several states. See Note 10 to the financial statements for additional information.
Other Business Activities
Southern Company's other business activities primarily include the parent company (which does not allocate operating expenses to business units); PowerSecure, which was acquired on May 9, 2016 and is a provider of energy solutions, including distributed infrastructure, energy efficiency products and services, and utility infrastructure services, to customers; Southern Company Holdings, Inc. (Southern Holdings), which invests in various projects, including leveraged lease projects; and Southern Linc, which provides digital wireless communications for use by Southern Company and its subsidiary companies and also markets these services to the public and provides fiber optics services within the Southeast.
A condensed statement of income for Southern Company's other business activities follows:
 Amount 
Increase (Decrease)
from Prior Year
 2018 2018 2017
 (in millions)
Operating revenues$1,015
 $444
 $268
Cost of other sales728
 313
 223
Other operations and maintenance273
 69
 9
Depreciation and amortization66
 14
 21
Taxes other than income taxes6
 3
 
Impairment charges12
 12
 
Total operating expenses1,085
 411
 253
Operating income (loss)(70) 33
 15
Interest expense579
 96
 178
Other income (expense), net(23) (23) 30
Income taxes (benefit)(222) 85
 (91)
Net income (loss)$(450) $(171) $(42)
In the table above, the 2018 changes for these other business activities reflect the inclusion of PowerSecure for the year ended December 31, 2018 compared to 2017. The 2017 changes reflect the inclusion of PowerSecure for the 12-month period in 2017 compared to the eight-month period following the acquisition on May 9, 2016, which is the primary variance driver. Additional detailed variance explanations are provided herein. See Note 15 to the financial statements under "Southern Company Acquisition of PowerSecure" for additional information.
Operating Revenues
Southern Company's operating revenues for these other business activities increased $444 million, or 77.8%, in 2018 as compared to the prior year. The increase was primarily related to PowerSecure's storm restoration services in Puerto Rico.
Cost of Other Sales
Cost of other sales for these other business activities increased $313 million, or 75.4% in 2018. The increase was primarily related to PowerSecure's storm restoration services in Puerto Rico.

MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS (continued)
Southern Company and Subsidiary Companies 2018 Annual Report


Other Operations and Maintenance Expenses
Other operations and maintenance expenses for these other business activities increased $69 million, or 33.8%, in 2018 as compared to the prior year. The increase was primarily due to PowerSecure's storm restoration services in Puerto Rico and parent company expenses related to the sale of Gulf Power. Other operations and maintenance expenses for these other business activities increased $9 million, or 4.6%, in 2017 as compared to the prior year. The increase was primarily due to a $44 million increase as a result of the inclusion of PowerSecure results for the 12-month period in 2017 compared to eight months in 2016, partially offset by a $35 million decrease in parent company expenses related to the Merger and the acquisition of PowerSecure.
Impairment Charges
Impairment charges for these other business activities were $12 million in 2018. These charges were associated with Southern Linc's tower leases and were recorded in contemplation of the sale of Gulf Power.
Interest Expense
Interest expense for these other business activities increased $96 million, or 19.9%, in 2018 as compared to the prior year primarily due to an increase in variable interest rates and average outstanding debt at the parent company. Interest expense for these other business activities increased $178 million, or 58.4%, in 2017 as compared to the prior year primarily due to an increase in average outstanding long-term debt at the parent company. See Note 8 to the financial statements for additional information.
Other Income (Expense), Net
Other income (expense), net for these other business activities decreased $23 million in 2018 as compared to the prior year primarily due to charitable donations, partially offset by leveraged lease income at Southern Holdings. See Note 1 to the financial statements for additional information. Other income (expense), net for these other business activities increased $30 million in 2017 as compared to the prior year primarily due to expenses associated with bridge financing for the Merger in 2016.
Income Taxes (Benefit)
The income tax benefit for these other business activities decreased $85 million, or 27.7%, in 2018 as compared to the prior year primarily as a result of the Tax Reform Legislation, partially offset by an increase in pre-tax losses at the parent company. The income tax benefit for these other business activities increased $91 million, or 42.1%, in 2017 as compared to the prior year primarily as a result of pre-tax earnings (losses) and net tax benefits related to the Tax Reform Legislation. See FUTURE EARNINGS POTENTIAL – "Income Tax MattersFederal Tax Reform Legislation" herein and Note 10 to the financial statements for additional information.
Effects of Inflation
The electric operating companies and natural gas distribution utilities are subject to rate regulation that is generally based on the recovery of historical and projected costs. The effects of inflation can create an economic loss since the recovery of costs could be in dollars that have less purchasing power. Southern Power is party to long-term contracts reflecting market-based rates, including inflation expectations. Any adverse effect of inflation on Southern Company's results of operations has not been substantial in recent years.
FUTURE EARNINGS POTENTIAL
General
The traditional electric operating companies operate as vertically integrated utilities providing electric service to customers within their service territories in the Southeast. On January 1, 2019, Southern Company completed the sale of Gulf Power, one of the traditional electric operating companies, to NextEra Energy. The natural gas distribution utilities provide service to customers in their service territories in Illinois, Georgia, Virginia, and Tennessee. In July 2018, Southern Company Gas completed sales of three of its natural gas distribution utilities. Prices for electricity provided and natural gas distributed to retail customers are set by state PSCs or other applicable state regulatory agencies under cost-based regulatory principles. Retail rates and earnings are reviewed and may be adjusted periodically within certain limitations. Prices for wholesale electricity sales and natural gas distribution, interconnecting transmission lines, and the exchange of electric power are regulated by the FERC. Southern Power continues to focus on long-term PPAs. In 2018, Southern Power completed sales of noncontrolling interests in entities indirectly owning substantially all of its solar facilities and eight of its wind facilities and also completed sales and entered into an agreement to sell certain of its natural gas plants. See ACCOUNTING POLICIES – "Application of Critical Accounting Policies

MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS (continued)
Southern Company and Subsidiary Companies 2018 Annual Report


and EstimatesUtility Regulation" herein and Note 2 to the financial statements for additional information about regulatory matters.
The results of operations for the past three years are not necessarily indicative of Southern Company's future earnings potential. Future earnings will be impacted by the 2018 disposition activities described herein and in Note 15 to the financial statements. The level of Southern Company's future earnings depends on numerous factors that affect the opportunities, challenges, and risks of the Southern Company system's primary businesses of selling electricity and distributing natural gas. These factors include the traditional electric operating companies' and the natural gas distribution utilities' ability to maintain constructive regulatory environments that allow for the timely recovery of prudently-incurred costs during a time of increasing costs, continued customer growth, and, for the traditional electric operating companies, the weak pace of growth in electricity use per customer, especially in residential and commercial markets. Plant Vogtle Units 3 and 4 construction and rate recovery and the profitability of Southern Power's competitive wholesale business are also major factors.
Earnings in the electricity business will also depend upon maintaining and growing sales, considering, among other things, the adoption and/or penetration rates of increasingly energy-efficient technologies, increasing volumes of electronic commerce transactions, and more multi-family home construction, all of which could contribute to a net reduction in customer usage. Earnings for both the electricity and natural gas businesses are subject to a variety of other factors. These factors include weather, competition, new energy contracts with other utilities and other wholesale customers, energy conservation practiced by customers, the use of alternative energy sources by customers, the prices of electricity and natural gas, the price elasticity of demand, and the rate of economic growth or decline in the service territory. In addition, the level of future earnings for the wholesale electric business also depends on numerous factors including regulatory matters, creditworthiness of customers, total electric generating capacity available and related costs, the development or acquisition of renewable facilities and other energy projects, and the successful remarketing of capacity as current contracts expire. Demand for electricity and natural gas is primarily driven by the pace of economic growth that may be affected by changes in regional and global economic conditions, which may impact future earnings. In addition, the volatility of natural gas prices has a significant impact on the natural gas distribution utilities' customer rates, long-term competitive position against other energy sources, and the ability of Southern Company Gas' gas marketing services and wholesale gas services businesses to capture value from locational and seasonal spreads. Additionally, changes in commodity prices subject a significant portion of Southern Company Gas' operations to earnings variability.
As part of its ongoing effort to adapt to changing market conditions, Southern Company continues to evaluate and consider a wide array of potential business strategies. These strategies may include business combinations, partnerships, and acquisitions involving other utility or non-utility businesses or properties, disposition of certain assets or businesses, internal restructuring, or some combination thereof. Furthermore, Southern Company may engage in new business ventures that arise from competitive and regulatory changes in the utility industry. Pursuit of any of the above strategies, or any combination thereof, may significantly affect the business operations, risks, and financial condition of Southern Company.
On January 1, 2019, Southern Company completed the sale of Gulf Power to NextEra Energy for an aggregate cash purchase price of approximately $5.8 billion (less $1.3 billion of indebtedness assumed), subject to customary working capital adjustments. In 2018, net income attributable to Gulf Power was $160 million.
On June 4, 2018, Southern Company Gas completed the stock sale of Pivotal Home Solutions to American Water Enterprises LLC for a total cash purchase price of $365 million. On July 1, 2018, a Southern Company Gas subsidiary, Pivotal Utility Holdings, completed the sales of the assets of two of its natural gas distribution utilities, Elizabethtown Gas and Elkton Gas, to South Jersey Industries, Inc. for a total cash purchase price of $1.7 billion. On July 29, 2018, Southern Company Gas and its wholly-owned direct subsidiary, NUI Corporation, completed the stock sale of Pivotal Utility Holdings, which primarily consisted of Florida City Gas, to NextEra Energy for a total cash purchase price of $587 million. The total cash purchase price for each transaction includes final working capital and other adjustments.
The Southern Company Gas Dispositions resulted in a net loss of $51 million, which includes $342 million of tax expense. The after-tax impacts of these dispositions included income tax expense on goodwill not deductible for tax purposes and for which a deferred tax liability had not been recorded previously. In addition, a goodwill impairment charge of $42 million was recorded during 2018 in contemplation of the sale of Pivotal Home Solutions.
On May 22, 2018, Southern Power sold a noncontrolling 33% equity interest in SP Solar, a limited partnership indirectly owning substantially all of Southern Power's solar facilities, for approximately $1.2 billion and, on December 11, 2018, sold a noncontrolling tax equity interest in SP Wind, a holding company owning a portfolio of eight operating wind facilities, for approximately $1.2 billion. Additionally, on November 5, 2018, Southern Power entered into an agreement to sell all of its equity interests in Plant Mankato (including the 385-MW expansion currently under construction) for an aggregate purchase price of approximately $650 million. The completion of the disposition is subject to the expansion unit reaching commercial operation as well as various other customary conditions to closing, including FERC and state commission approvals, and the sale is expected

MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS (continued)
Southern Company and Subsidiary Companies 2018 Annual Report


to close mid-2019. The ultimate outcome of this matter cannot be determined at this time. On December 4, 2018, Southern Power sold of all of its equity interests in the Florida Plants to NextEra Energy for approximately $203 million.
See Note 15 to the financial statements for additional information regarding disposition activities.
Environmental Matters
The Southern Company system's operations are regulated by state and federal environmental agencies through a variety of laws and regulations governing air, water, land, and protection of other natural resources. The Southern Company system maintains comprehensive environmental compliance and GHG strategies to assess upcoming requirements and compliance costs associated with these environmental laws and regulations. The costs, including capital expenditures, operations and maintenance costs, and costs reflected in ARO liabilities, required to comply with environmental laws and regulations and to achieve stated goals may impact future electric generating unit retirement and replacement decisions, results of operations, cash flows, and/or financial condition. Related costs may result from the installation of additional environmental controls, closure and monitoring of CCR facilities, unit retirements, or changing fuel sources for certain existing units, as well as related upgrades to the Southern Company system's transmission and distribution (electric and natural gas) systems. A major portion of these costs is expected to be recovered through retail and wholesale rates. The ultimate impact of environmental laws and regulations and the GHG goals discussed herein will depend on various factors, such as state adoption and implementation of requirements, the availability and cost of any deployed technology, fuel prices, and the outcome of pending and/or future legal challenges.
New or revised environmental laws and regulations could affect many areas of the traditional electric operating companies', Southern Power's, and the natural gas distribution utilities' operations. The impact of any such changes cannot be determined at this time. Environmental compliance costs could affect earnings if such costs cannot continue to be recovered in rates on a timely basis for the traditional electric operating companies and the natural gas distribution utilities or through long-term wholesale agreements for the traditional electric operating companies and Southern Power. Further, increased costs that are recovered through regulated rates could contribute to reduced demand for electricity and natural gas, which could negatively affect results of operations, cash flows, and/or financial condition. Additionally, many commercial and industrial customers may also be affected by existing and future environmental requirements, which for some may have the potential to ultimately affect their demand for electricity and natural gas.
The Southern Company system's commitment to the environment has been demonstrated in many ways, including participating in partnerships resulting in approximately $140 million of funding that has restored or enhanced more than 2 million acres of habitat since 2003; the removal of more than 15.5 million pounds of trash and debris from waterways between 2000 and 2018 through the Renew Our Rivers program; a 21.2% reduction in surface water withdrawal from 2015 to 2017; reductions in SO2 and NOX air emissions of 98% and 89%, respectively, from 1990 to 2017; the reduction of mercury air emissions of over 95% from 2005 to 2017; and the Southern Company system's changing energy mix.
Through 2018, the traditional electric operating companies have invested approximately $14.2 billion in environmental capital retrofit projects to comply with environmental requirements, with annual totals of approximately $1.3 billion, $0.9 billion, and $0.5 billion for 2018, 2017, and 2016, respectively. Although the timing, requirements, and estimated costs could change as environmental laws and regulations are adopted or modified, as compliance plans are revised or updated, and as legal challenges to rules are initiated or completed, the Southern Company system's current compliance strategy estimates capital expenditures of $1.4 billion from 2019 through 2023, with annual totals of approximately $0.5 billion, $0.2 billion, $0.3 billion, $0.3 billion, and $0.2 billion for 2019, 2020, 2021, 2022, and 2023, respectively. These estimates do not include any potential compliance costs associated with pending regulation of CO2 emissions from fossil fuel-fired electric generating units. See "Global Climate Issues" herein for additional information. The Southern Company system also anticipates substantial expenditures associated with ash pond closure and ground water monitoring under the CCR Rule, which are reflected in Southern Company's ARO liabilities. See FINANCIAL CONDITION AND LIQUIDITY – "Capital Requirements and Contractual Obligations" herein and Note 6 to the financial statements for additional information.
Environmental Laws and Regulations
Air Quality
The EPA has set National Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS) for six air pollutants (carbon monoxide, lead, nitrogen dioxide, ozone, particulate matter, and SO2) to protect and improve the nation's air quality, which it reviews and revises periodically. Following a NAAQS revision, states are required to develop an EPA-approved plan to protect air quality. These state plans can require additional emission controls, improvements in control efficiency, or fuel changes which can result in increased compliance and operational costs. NAAQS requirements can also adversely affect the siting of new electric generating facilities. All areas within the Southern Company system's electric service territory have been designated as attainment for all NAAQS

MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS (continued)
Southern Company and Subsidiary Companies 2018 Annual Report


except for a seven-county area within metropolitan Atlanta that is not in attainment with the 2015 ozone NAAQS and the area surrounding Plant Hammond, in Georgia, which will not be designated attainment or nonattainment for the 2010 SO2 standard until December 2020. If areas are designated as nonattainment in the future, increased compliance costs could result. See "Regulatory Matters – Georgia Power – Integrated Resource Plan" herein for information regarding Georgia Power's request to decertify and retire Plant Hammond.
In 2011, the EPA finalized the Cross-State Air Pollution Rule (CSAPR) to address impacts of SO2 and NOX emissions from fossil fuel-fired electric generating plants. CSAPR establishes emissions trading programs and budgets for certain states and allocates emissions allowances for sources in those states. In 2016, the EPA published a final rule establishing more stringent ozone season NOX emissions budgets in Alabama, Mississippi, and Texas. Georgia's ozone season NOX emissions budget remained unchanged. The EPA also removed North Carolina from this particular CSAPR program. The outcome of ongoing CSAPR litigation concerning the 2016 CSAPR rule, to which Mississippi Power is a party, could have an impact on the State of Mississippi's ozone season NOX emissions budget. Increases in either future fossil fuel-fired generation or the availability or cost of CSAPR allowances could have a negative financial impact on results of operations for Southern Company.
The EPA finalized regional haze regulations in 2005 and 2017. These regulations require states, tribal governments, and various federal agencies to develop and implement plans to reduce pollutants that impair visibility and demonstrate reasonable progress toward the goal of restoring natural visibility conditions in certain areas, including national parks and wilderness areas. States must submit a revised state implementation plan (SIP) to the EPA demonstrating continued reasonable progress towards achieving visibility improvement goals. These plans could require reductions in certain pollutants, such as particulate matter, SO2, and NOX, which could result in increased compliance costs. The EPA approved the regional progress SIPs for the States of Alabama and Georgia, but only issued a limited approval of the regional progress SIP for the State of Mississippi because Mississippi must revise the best available retrofit technology (BART) provisions of its SIP. Therefore, Mississippi Power's Plant Daniel is the only electric generating unit in the Southern Company system that continues to be evaluated under the regional haze BART provisions. Mississippi Power is required to submit Plant Daniel's BART analysis to the State of Mississippi by summer 2019. Requirements for further reduction of these pollutants at Plant Daniel could increase compliance costs.
Water Quality
In 2014, the EPA finalized requirements under Section 316(b) of the Clean Water Act (CWA) to regulate cooling water intake structures (CWIS) to minimize their effects on fish and other aquatic life at existing power plants (e.g. coal, natural gas, oil, and nuclear generating plants) and manufacturing facilities. The regulation requires plant-specific studies to determine applicable CWIS changes to protect organisms that either get caught on the intake screens (impingement) or are drawn into the cooling system (entrainment). The Southern Company system is conducting these studies and currently anticipates applicable CWIS changes may include fish-friendly CWIS screens with fish return systems and minor additions of monitoring equipment at certain plants. However, the ultimate impact of this rule will depend on the outcome of these plant-specific studies, any additional protective measures required to be incorporated into each plant's National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit based on site-specific factors, and the outcome of any legal challenges.
In 2015, the EPA finalized the steam electric effluent limitations guidelines (ELG) rule (2015 ELG Rule) that set national standards for wastewater discharges from new and existing steam electric generating units generating greater than 50 MWs. The 2015 ELG Rule prohibits effluent discharges of certain waste streams and imposes stringent limits on flue gas desulfurization (scrubber) wastewater discharges. The revised technology-based limits and the CCR Rule require extensive changes to existing ash and wastewater management systems or the installation and operation of new ash and wastewater management systems. Compliance with the 2015 ELG Rule is expected to require capital expenditures and increased operational costs primarily for the traditional electric operating companies' coal-fired electric generation. State environmental agencies will incorporate specific compliance applicability dates in the NPDES permitting process for each ELG waste stream no later than December 31, 2023. The EPA is scheduled to issue a new rulemaking by December 2019 that could revise the limitations and applicability dates of two of the waste streams regulated in the 2015 ELG Rule. The impact of any changes to the 2015 ELG Rule will depend on the content of the new rule and the outcome of any legal challenges.
In 2015, the EPA and the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (Corps) jointly published a final rule that revised the regulatory definition of waters of the United States (WOTUS) for all CWA programs. The rule significantly expanded the scope of federal jurisdiction over waterbodies (such as rivers, streams, canals, and wastewater treatment ponds), which could impact new generation projects and permitting and reporting requirements associated with the installation, expansion, and maintenance of transmission, distribution, and pipeline projects. The EPA and the Corps are expected to publish a final rule in 2019 to replace the 2015 WOTUS definition. The impact of any changes to the 2015 WOTUS rule will depend on the content of this final rule and the outcome of any legal challenges.

MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS (continued)
Southern Company and Subsidiary Companies 2018 Annual Report


Coal Combustion Residuals
In 2015, the EPA finalized non-hazardous solid waste regulations for the disposal of CCR, including coal ash and gypsum, in landfills and surface impoundments (ash ponds) at active generating power plants. In addition to the EPA's CCR Rule, the States of Alabama and Georgia have also finalized regulations regarding the handling of CCR within their respective states. The EPA's CCR Rule requires landfills and ash ponds to be evaluated against a set of performance criteria and potentially closed if minimum criteria are not met. Closure of existing landfills and ash ponds could require installation of equipment and infrastructure to manage CCR in accordance with the CCR Rule. Based on cost estimates for closure and monitoring of landfills and ash ponds pursuant to the CCR Rule, the Southern Company system recorded AROs for each CCR unit in 2015. As further analysis was performed and closure details were developed, the traditional electric operating companies have continued to periodically update these cost estimates, as discussed further below.
The EPA published certain amendments to the CCR Rule, which became effective August 29, 2018. These amendments extend the date from April 2019 to October 31, 2020 to cease sending CCR and other waste streams to ash ponds that demonstrate compliance with all except two of the specified performance criteria.
On August 21, 2018, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit issued a decision suggesting the EPA should regulate previously-excluded inactive ash ponds located at retired generation facilities and questioning both the ability of unlined ash ponds to continue operating no matter the performance criteria results and the classification of clay-lined landfills and ash ponds. These developments could impact the expected timing of the traditional electric operating companies' landfill and ash pond closure activities, but the extent of any impact will depend on the outcome of ongoing litigation, anticipated EPA rulemaking action to establish further guidance, and the outcome of any legal challenges.
In June 2018, Alabama Power recorded an increase of approximately $1.2 billion to its AROs related to the CCR Rule. The revised cost estimates were based on information from feasibility studies performed on ash ponds in use at plants operated by Alabama Power, including at a plant jointly-owned by Mississippi Power. During the second quarter 2018, Alabama Power's management completed its analysis of these studies which indicated that additional closure costs, primarily related to increases in estimated ash volume, water management requirements, and design revisions, will be required to close these ash ponds under the planned closure-in-place methodology. As the level of work becomes more defined in the next 12 months, it is likely that these cost estimates will change and the change could be material.
In December 2018, Georgia Power recorded an increase of approximately $3.1 billion to its AROs related to the CCR Rule and the related state rule. During the second half of 2018, Georgia Power completed a strategic assessment related to its plans to close the ash ponds at all of its generating plants in compliance with the CCR Rule and the related state rule. This assessment included engineering and constructability studies related to design assumptions for ash pond closures and advanced engineering methods. The results indicated that additional closure costs will be required to close these ash ponds, primarily due to changes in closure strategies, the estimated amount of ash to be excavated, and additional water management requirements necessary to support closure strategies. These factors also impact the estimated timing of future cash outlays.
The traditional electric operating companies expect to periodically update their ARO cost estimates. Absent continued recovery of ARO costs through regulated rates, Southern Company's results of operations, cash flows, and financial condition could be materially impacted. See FINANCIAL CONDITION AND LIQUIDITY – "Capital Requirements and Contractual Obligations" herein and Note 6 to the financial statements for additional information.
The ultimate outcome of these matters cannot be determined at this time.
Nuclear Decommissioning
In June 2018, Alabama Power completed an updated decommissioning cost site study for Plant Farley. The estimated cost of decommissioning based on the study resulted in an increase in Alabama Power's ARO liability of approximately $300 million. Amounts previously contributed to Alabama Power's external trust funds are currently projected to be adequate to meet the updated decommissioning obligations.
In December 2018, Georgia Power completed updated decommissioning cost site studies for Plant Hatch and Plant Vogtle Units 1 and 2. The estimated cost of decommissioning based on the studies resulted in an increase in Georgia Power's ARO liability of approximately $130 million. Georgia Power currently collects $4 million and $2 million annually in rates, which is used to fund external nuclear decommissioning trusts for Plant Hatch and Plant Vogtle Units 1 and 2, respectively. Georgia Power expects the Georgia PSC to review and adjust, if necessary, these amounts in the Georgia Power 2019 Base Rate Case.
See Note 6 to the financial statements for additional information.

MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS (continued)
Southern Company and Subsidiary Companies 2018 Annual Report


Environmental Remediation
The Southern Company system must comply with environmental laws and regulations governing the handling and disposal of waste and releases of hazardous substances. Under these various laws and regulations, the Southern Company system could incur substantial costs to clean up affected sites. The traditional electric operating companies and the natural gas distribution utilities conduct studies to determine the extent of any required cleanup and Southern Company has recognized the estimated costs to clean up known impacted sites in its financial statements. Amounts for cleanup and ongoing monitoring costs were not material for any year presented. The traditional electric operating companies and the natural gas distribution utilities in Illinois and Georgia have all received authority from their respective state PSCs or other applicable state regulatory agencies to recover approved environmental compliance costs through regulatory mechanisms. These regulatory mechanisms are adjusted annually or as necessary within limits approved by the state PSCs or other applicable state regulatory agencies. The traditional electric operating companies and Southern Company Gas may be liable for some or all required cleanup costs for additional sites that may require environmental remediation. See Note 3 to the financial statements under "Environmental Remediation" for additional information.
Global Climate Issues
On August 31, 2018, the EPA published a proposed rule known as the Affordable Clean Energy (ACE) Rule, which is intended to replace a regulation enacted in 2015 known as the Clean Power Plan (CPP), that would limit CO2 emissions from existing fossil fuel-fired electric generating units. The CPP has been stayed by the U.S. Supreme Court since 2016. The ACE Rule would require states to develop GHG unit-specific emission rate standards based on heat-rate efficiency improvements for existing fossil fuel-fired steam units. As proposed, combustion turbines, including natural gas combined cycles, are not affected sources. As of January 1, 2019, the Southern Company system has ownership interests in 40 fossil fuel-fired steam units to which the proposed ACE Rule is applicable. The ultimate impact of this rule to the Southern Company system is currently unknown and will depend on changes between the proposal and the final rule, subsequent state plan developments and requirements, and any associated legal challenges.
On December 20, 2018, the EPA published a proposed review of the Standards of Performance for Greenhouse Gas Emissions from New, Modified, and Reconstructed Stationary Sources: Electric Utility Generating Units final rule (2015 NSPS rule). The EPA's final 2015 NSPS rule set standards of performance for new, modified, and reconstructed electric utility generating units which included stationary combustion turbines and fossil-fired steam boilers. This proposal reduces the stringency of the 2015 NSPS rule by not basing the new and reconstructed fossil-fired steam boiler and IGCC standards on partial carbon capture and sequestration. The impact of any changes to this rule will depend on the content of the final rule and the outcome of any legal challenges.
Additional domestic GHG policies may emerge in the future requiring the United States to transition to a lower GHG emitting economy. The Southern Company system has transitioned from an electric generating mix of 70% coal and 15% natural gas in 2007 to a mix of 30% coal and 46% natural gas in 2018, along with over 8,000 MWs of renewable resources. This transition has been supported in part by the Southern Company system retiring 4,226 MWs of coal- and oil-fired generating capacity since 2010 and converting 3,280 MWs of generating capacity from coal to natural gas since 2015. In addition, Southern Company Gas has replaced approximately 5,600 miles of bare steel and cast-iron pipe, resulting in removal of approximately 2.5 million metric tons of GHG from its natural gas distribution system since 1998. Based on ownership or financial control of facilities, the Southern Company system's 2017 GHG emissions (CO2 equivalent) were approximately 98 million metric tons, with 2018 emissions estimated at 98 million metric tons. This equates to a reduction of 36% between 2007 and 2018. The 2018 estimates include GHG emissions attributable to each of Elizabethtown Gas, Elkton Gas, Florida City Gas, and the Florida Plants through the date of the applicable disposition. See Note 15 to the financial statements for additional information regarding disposition activities.
In April 2018, Southern Company established an intermediate goal of a 50% reduction in carbon emissions from 2007 levels by 2030 and a long-term goal of low- to no-carbon operations by 2050. To achieve these goals, the Southern Company system expects to continue growing its renewable energy portfolio, optimize technology advancements to modernize its transmission and distribution systems, increase the use of natural gas for generation, complete ongoing construction projects, including Georgia Power's interest in Plant Vogtle Units 3 and 4, invest in energy efficiency, and continue research and development efforts focused on technologies to lower GHG emissions. The Southern Company system's ability to achieve these goals also will be dependent on many external factors, including supportive national energy policies, low natural gas prices, and the development, deployment, and advancement of relevant energy technologies.

MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS (continued)
Southern Company and Subsidiary Companies 2018 Annual Report


FERC Matters
Open Access Transmission Tariff
On May 10, 2018, AMEA and Cooperative Energy filed with the FERC a complaint against SCS and the traditional electric operating companies claiming that the current 11.25% base ROE used in calculating the annual transmission revenue requirements of the traditional electric operating companies' open access transmission tariff is unjust and unreasonable as measured by the applicable FERC standards. The complaint requested that the base ROE be set no higher than 8.65% and that the FERC order refunds for the difference in revenue requirements that results from applying a just and reasonable ROE established in this proceeding upon determining the current ROE is unjust and unreasonable. On June 18, 2018, SCS and the traditional electric operating companies filed their response challenging the adequacy of the showing presented by the complainants and offering support for the current ROE. On September 6, 2018, the FERC issued an order establishing a refund effective date of May 10, 2018 in the event a refund is due and initiating an investigation and settlement procedures regarding the current base ROE. Through December 31, 2018, the estimated maximum potential refund is not expected to be material to Southern Company's results of operations or cash flows. The ultimate outcome of this matter cannot be determined at this time.
Southern Company Gas
Southern Company Gas' gas pipeline investments business is involved in two significant pipeline construction projects, the Atlantic Coast Pipeline (5% ownership) and the PennEast Pipeline (20% ownership), which received FERC approval in October 2017 and January 2018, respectively. Southern Company Gas' total capital expenditures, excluding AFUDC, at completion are expected to be between $350 million and $390 million for the Atlantic Coast Pipeline and $276 million for the PennEast Pipeline. These projects, along with Southern Company Gas' existing pipelines, are intended to provide diverse sources of natural gas supplies to customers, resolve current and long-term supply planning for new capacity, enhance system reliability, and generate economic development in the areas served.
Work continues with state and federal agencies to obtain the required permits to begin construction on the PennEast Pipeline. Any material delays may impact forecasted capital expenditures and the expected in-service date.
The Atlantic Coast Pipeline has experienced challenges to its permits since construction began in 2018. During the third and fourth quarters 2018, a FERC stop work order, together with delays in obtaining permits necessary for construction and construction delays due to judicial actions, impacted the cost and schedule for the project. As a result, total project cost estimates have increased from between $6.0 billion and $6.5 billion to between $7.0 billion and $7.8 billion, excluding financing costs. Southern Company Gas' share of the total project costs is 5% and Southern Company Gas' investment at December 31, 2018 totaled $83 million. The operator of the joint venture currently expects to achieve a late 2020 in-service date for at least key segments of the Atlantic Coast Pipeline, while the remainder may extend into early 2021. Southern Company Gas has evaluated the recoverability of its investment and determined there was no impairment as of December 31, 2018. Abnormal weather, work delays (including due to judicial or regulatory action), and other conditions may result in additional cost or schedule modifications, which could result in an impairment of Southern Company Gas' investment and could have a material impact on Southern Company's financial statements.
The ultimate outcome of these matters cannot be determined at this time. See Notes 7 and 9 to the financial statements under "Southern Company GasEquity Method Investments" and "Guarantees," respectively, for additional information on these pipeline projects.
Regulatory Matters
Alabama Power
Alabama Power's revenues from regulated retail operations are collected through various rate mechanisms subject to the oversight of the Alabama PSC. Alabama Power currently recovers its costs from the regulated retail business primarily through Rate RSE, Rate CNP, Rate ECR, and Rate NDR. In addition, the Alabama PSC issues accounting orders to address current events impacting Alabama Power. See Note 2 to the financial statements under "Alabama Power" for additional information regarding Alabama Power's rate mechanisms and accounting orders.
Rate RSE
The Alabama PSC has adopted Rate RSE that provides for periodic annual adjustments based upon Alabama Power's projected weighted common equity return (WCER) compared to an allowable range. Rate RSE adjustments are based on forward-looking information for the applicable upcoming calendar year. Rate RSE adjustments for any two-year period, when averaged together, cannot exceed 4.0% and any annual adjustment is limited to 5.0%. When the projected WCER is under the allowed range, there is

MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS (continued)
Southern Company and Subsidiary Companies 2018 Annual Report


an adjusting point of 5.98% and eligibility for a performance-based adder of seven basis points, or 0.07%, to the WCER adjusting point if Alabama Power (i) has an "A" credit rating equivalent with at least one of the recognized rating agencies or (ii) is in the top one-third of a designated customer value benchmark survey. If Alabama Power's actual retail return is above the allowed WCER range, the excess will be refunded to customers unless otherwise directed by the Alabama PSC; however, there is no provision for additional customer billings should the actual retail return fall below the WCER range. Prior to January 2019, retail rates remained unchanged when the WCER range was between 5.75% and 6.21%.
On May 1, 2018, the Alabama PSC approved modifications to Rate RSE and other commitments designed to position Alabama Power to address the growing pressure on its credit quality resulting from the Tax Reform Legislation, without increasing retail rates under Rate RSE in the near term. Alabama Power plans to reduce growth in total debt by increasing equity, with corresponding reductions in debt issuances, thereby de-leveraging its capital structure. Alabama Power's goal is to achieve an equity ratio of approximately 55% by the end of 2025. At December 31, 2018, Alabama Power's equity ratio was approximately 47%.
The approved modifications to Rate RSE began for billings in January 2019. The modifications include reducing the top of the allowed WCER range from 6.21% to 6.15% and modifications to the refund mechanism applicable to prior year actual results. The modifications to the refund mechanism allow Alabama Power to retain a portion of the revenue that causes the actual WCER for a given year to exceed the allowed range.
Generally, if Alabama Power's actual WCER is between 6.15% and 7.65%, customers will receive 25% of the amount between 6.15% and 6.65%, 40% of the amount between 6.65% and 7.15%, and 75% of the amount between 7.15% and 7.65%. Customers will receive all amounts in excess of an actual WCER of 7.65%.
In conjunction with these modifications to Rate RSE, on May 8, 2018, Alabama Power consented to a moratorium on any upward adjustments under Rate RSE for 2019 and 2020 and will also return $50 million to customers through bill credits in 2019.
On November 30, 2018, Alabama Power made its required annual Rate RSE submission to the Alabama PSC of projected data for calendar year 2019. Projected earnings were within the specified range; therefore, retail rates under Rate RSE remain unchanged for 2019.
At December 31, 2018, Alabama Power's retail return exceeded the allowed WCER range, which resulted in Alabama Power establishing a regulatory liability of $109 million for Rate RSE refunds. In accordance with an Alabama PSC order issued on February 5, 2019, Alabama Power will apply $75 million to reduce the Rate ECR under recovered balance and the remaining $34 million will be refunded to customers through bill credits in July through September 2019.
Rate CNP PPA
Alabama Power's retail rates, approved by the Alabama PSC, provide for adjustments under Rate CNP to recognize the placing of new generating facilities into retail service. Alabama Power may also recover retail costs associated with certificated PPAs under Rate CNP PPA. No adjustments to Rate CNP PPA occurred during the period 2016 through 2018 and no adjustment is expected in 2019.
In accordance with an accounting order issued in February 2017 by the Alabama PSC, Alabama Power reclassified $69 million of the December 31, 2016 Rate CNP PPA under recovered balance to a separate regulatory asset. The amortization of the new regulatory asset through Rate RSE will begin concurrently with the effective date of Alabama Power's next depreciation study, which is expected to occur no later than 2022.
Rate CNP Compliance
Rate CNP Compliance allows for the recovery of Alabama Power's retail costs associated with laws, regulations, and other such mandates directed at the utility industry involving the environment, security, reliability, safety, sustainability, or similar considerations impacting Alabama Power's facilities or operations. Rate CNP Compliance is based on forward-looking information and provides for the recovery of these costs pursuant to a factor that is calculated annually. Compliance costs to be recovered include operations and maintenance expenses, depreciation, and a return on certain invested capital. Revenues for Rate CNP Compliance, as recorded on the financial statements, are adjusted for differences in actual recoverable costs and amounts billed in current regulated rates. Accordingly, changes in the billing factor will have no significant effect on revenues or net income, but will affect annual cash flow. Changes in Rate CNP Compliance-related operations and maintenance expenses and depreciation generally will have no effect on net income.
In accordance with an accounting order issued in February 2017 by the Alabama PSC, Alabama Power reclassified $36 million of its under recovered balance in Rate CNP Compliance to a separate regulatory asset. The amortization of the new regulatory asset

MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS (continued)
Southern Company and Subsidiary Companies 2018 Annual Report


through Rate RSE will begin concurrently with the effective date of Alabama Power's next depreciation study, which is expected to occur no later than 2022.
On November 30, 2018, Alabama Power submitted calculations associated with its cost of complying with environmental mandates, as provided under Rate CNP Compliance. The filing reflected a projected unrecovered retail revenue requirement for environmental compliance of approximately $205 million, which is being recovered in the billing months of January 2019 through December 2019.
Tax Reform Accounting Order
On May 1, 2018, the Alabama PSC approved an accounting order that authorized Alabama Power to defer the benefits of federal excess deferred income taxes associated with the Tax Reform Legislation for the year ended December 31, 2018 as a regulatory liability and to use up to $30 million of such deferrals to offset under recovered amounts under Rate ECR. The estimated deferrals for the year ended December 31, 2018 totaled approximately $63 million, subject to adjustment following the filing of the 2018 tax return, of which $30 million was used to offset the Rate ECR under recovered balance and $33 million is recorded in other regulatory liabilities, deferred on the balance sheet to be used for the benefit of customers as determined by the Alabama PSC at a future date. See Note 10 to the financial statements under "Current and Deferred Income Taxes" for additional information.
Environmental Accounting Order
Based on an order from the Alabama PSC (Environmental Accounting Order), Alabama Power is allowed to establish a regulatory asset to record the unrecovered investment costs, including the unrecovered plant asset balance and the unrecovered costs associated with site removal and closure associated with future unit retirements caused by environmental regulations. The regulatory asset is being amortized and recovered over the affected unit's remaining useful life, as established prior to the decision regarding early retirement through Rate CNP Compliance. At December 31, 2018, this regulatory asset had a balance of $42 million. See "Environmental MattersEnvironmental Laws and Regulations" herein for additional information regarding environmental regulations.
Subsequent to December 31, 2018, Alabama Power determined that Plant Gorgas Units 8, 9, and 10 (approximately 1,000 MWs) will be retired by April 15, 2019 due to the expected costs of compliance with federal and state environmental regulations. In accordance with the Environmental Accounting Order, approximately $740 million of net investment costs will be transferred to a regulatory asset at the retirement date and recovered over the affected units' remaining useful lives, as established prior to the decision to retire.
Georgia Power
Georgia Power's revenues from regulated retail operations are collected through various rate mechanisms subject to the oversight of the Georgia PSC. Georgia Power currently recovers its costs from the regulated retail business through the 2013 ARP, which includes traditional base tariff rates, Demand-Side Management (DSM) tariffs, Environmental Compliance Cost Recovery (ECCR) tariffs, and Municipal Franchise Fee (MFF) tariffs. Georgia Power is scheduled to file a base rate case by July 1, 2019, which may continue or modify these tariffs. In addition, financing costs on certified construction costs of Plant Vogtle Units 3 and 4 are being collected through the NCCR tariff and fuel costs are collected through a separate fuel cost recovery tariff. See Note 2 to the financial statements under "Georgia Power" for additional information.
Rate Plans
Pursuant to the terms and conditions of a settlement agreement related to Southern Company's acquisition of Southern Company Gas approved by the Georgia PSC in 2016, the 2013 ARP will continue in effect until December 31, 2019, and Georgia Power will be required to file its next base rate case by July 1, 2019. Furthermore, through December 31, 2019, Georgia Power will retain its merger savings, net of transition costs, as defined in the settlement agreement; through December 31, 2022, such net merger savings will be shared on a 60/40 basis with customers; thereafter, all merger savings will be retained by customers. See Note 15 to the financial statements under "Southern Company Merger with Southern Company Gas" for additional information regarding the Merger.
There were no changes to Georgia Power's traditional base tariff rates, ECCR tariff, DSM tariffs, or MFF tariff in 2017 or 2018.
Under the 2013 ARP, Georgia Power's retail ROE is set at 10.95% and earnings are evaluated against a retail ROE range of 10.00% to 12.00%. Two-thirds of any earnings above 12.00% will be directly refunded to customers, with the remaining one-third retained by Georgia Power. There will be no recovery of any earnings shortfall below 10.00% on an actual basis. In 2016, Georgia Power's retail ROE exceeded 12.00%, and Georgia Power refunded to retail customers in 2018 approximately $40 million as approved by the Georgia PSC. On February 5, 2019, the Georgia PSC approved a settlement between Georgia Power and the staff

MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS (continued)
Southern Company and Subsidiary Companies 2018 Annual Report


of the Georgia PSC under which Georgia Power's retail ROE for 2017 was stipulated to exceed 12.00% and Georgia Power will reduce certain regulatory assets by approximately $4 million in lieu of providing refunds to retail customers. In 2018, Georgia Power's retail ROE exceeded 12.00%, and Georgia Power accrued approximately $100 million to refund to retail customers, subject to review and approval by the Georgia PSC.
On April 3, 2018, the Georgia PSC approved the Georgia Power Tax Reform Settlement Agreement. Pursuant to the Georgia Power Tax Reform Settlement Agreement, to reflect the federal income tax rate reduction impact of the Tax Reform Legislation, Georgia Power will refund to customers a total of $330 million through bill credits. Georgia Power issued bill credits of approximately $130 million in 2018 and will issue bill credits of approximately $95 million in June 2019 and $105 million in February 2020. In addition, Georgia Power is deferring as a regulatory liability (i) the revenue equivalent of the tax expense reduction resulting from legislation lowering the Georgia state income tax rate from 6.00% to 5.75% in 2019 and (ii) the entire benefit of federal and state excess accumulated deferred income taxes, which is expected to total approximately $700 million at December 31, 2019. At December 31, 2018, the related regulatory liability balance totaled $610 million. The amortization of these regulatory liabilities is expected to be addressed in the Georgia Power 2019 Base Rate Case. If there is not a base rate case in 2019, customers will receive $185 million in annual bill credits beginning in 2020, with any additional federal and state income tax savings deferred as a regulatory liability, until Georgia Power's next base rate case.
To address some of the negative cash flow and credit quality impacts of the Tax Reform Legislation, the Georgia PSC also approved an increase in Georgia Power's retail equity ratio to the lower of (i) Georgia Power's actual common equity weight in its capital structure or (ii) 55%, until the Georgia Power 2019 Base Rate Case. At December 31, 2018, Georgia Power's actual retail common equity ratio (on a 13-month average basis) was approximately 55%. Benefits from reduced federal income tax rates in excess of the amounts refunded to customers will be retained by Georgia Power to cover the carrying costs of the incremental equity in 2018 and 2019.
Integrated Resource Plan
See "Environmental Matters" herein for additional information regarding proposed and final EPA rules and regulations, including revisions to ELG for steam electric power plants and additional regulations of CCR and CO2.
In 2016, the Georgia PSC approved Georgia Power's triennial Integrated Resource Plan (2016 IRP) including the reclassification of the remaining net book value of Plant Mitchell Unit 3 and costs associated with materials and supplies remaining at the unit retirement date to a regulatory asset. Recovery of the unit's net book value will continue through December 31, 2019, as provided in the 2013 ARP. The timing of the recovery of the remaining balance of the unit's net book value as of December 31, 2019 and costs associated with materials and supplies remaining at the unit retirement date was deferred for consideration in the Georgia Power 2019 Base Rate Case.
In the 2016 IRP, the Georgia PSC also approved recovery of costs up to $99 million through June 30, 2019 to preserve nuclear generation as an option at a future generation site in Stewart County, Georgia. In March 2017, the Georgia PSC approved Georgia Power's decision to suspend work at the site due to changing economics, including lower load forecasts and fuel costs. The timing of recovery for costs incurred of approximately $50 million is expected to be determined by the Georgia PSC in the Georgia Power 2019 Base Rate Case.
On January 31, 2019, Georgia Power filed its triennial IRP (2019 IRP). The filing includes a request to decertify and retire Plant Hammond Units 1 through 4 (840 MWs) and Plant McIntosh Unit 1 (142.5 MWs) upon approval of the 2019 IRP.
In the 2019 IRP, Georgia Power requested approval to reclassify the remaining net book value of Plant Hammond Units 1 through 4 (approximately $520 million at December 31, 2018) upon retirement to a regulatory asset to be amortized ratably over a period equal to the applicable unit's remaining useful life through 2035. For Plant McIntosh Unit 1, Georgia Power requested approval to reclassify the remaining net book value (approximately $40 million at December 31, 2018) upon retirement to a regulatory asset to be amortized over a three-year period to be determined in the Georgia Power 2019 Base Rate Case. Georgia Power also requested approval to reclassify any unusable material and supplies inventory balances remaining at the applicable unit's retirement date to a regulatory asset for recovery over a period to be determined in the Georgia Power 2019 Base Rate Case.
The 2019 IRP also includes a request to certify approximately 25 MWs of capacity at Plant Scherer Unit 3 for the retail jurisdiction beginning January 1, 2020, following the expiration of a wholesale PPA.
The 2019 IRP also includes details regarding ARO costs associated with ash pond and landfill closures and post-closure care. Georgia Power requested the timing and rate of recovery of these costs be determined by the Georgia PSC in the Georgia Power 2019 Base Rate Case. See "Environmental Matters – Environmental Laws and Regulations – Coal Combustion Residuals" and FINANCIAL CONDITION AND LIQUIDITY – "Capital Requirements and Contractual Obligations" herein and Note 6 to the financial statements for additional information regarding Georgia Power's AROs.

MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS (continued)
Southern Company and Subsidiary Companies 2018 Annual Report


Georgia Power also requested approval to issue two capacity-based requests for proposals (RFP). If approved, the first capacity-based RFP will seek resources that can provide capacity beginning in 2022 or 2023 and the second capacity-based RFP will seek resources that can provide capacity beginning in 2026, 2027, or 2028. Additionally, the 2019 IRP includes a request to procure an additional 1,000 MWs of renewable resources through a competitive bidding process. Georgia Power also proposed to invest in a portfolio of up to 50 MWs of battery energy storage technologies.
A decision from the Georgia PSC on the 2019 IRP is expected in mid-2019.
The ultimate outcome of these matters cannot be determined at this time.
Storm Damage Recovery
Georgia Power is accruing $30 million annually through December 31, 2019, as provided in the 2013 ARP, for incremental operations and maintenance costs of damage from major storms to its transmission and distribution facilities. At December 31, 2018, the total balance in the regulatory asset related to storm damage was $416 million. During October 2018, Hurricane Michael caused significant damage to Georgia Power's transmission and distribution facilities. The incremental restoration costs related to this hurricane deferred in the regulatory asset for storm damage totaled approximately $115 million. Hurricanes Irma and Matthew also caused significant damage to Georgia Power's transmission and distribution facilities during September 2017 and October 2016, respectively. The incremental restoration costs related to Hurricanes Irma and Matthew deferred in Georgia Power's regulatory asset for storm damage totaled approximately $250 million. The rate of storm damage cost recovery is expected to be adjusted as part of the Georgia Power 2019 Base Rate Case and further adjusted in future regulatory proceedings as necessary. The ultimate outcome of this matter cannot be determined at this time. See Note 2 to the financial statements under "Georgia PowerStorm Damage Recovery" for additional information regarding Georgia Power's storm damage reserve.
Mississippi Power
Mississippi Power's retail base rates generally are set under the PEP, a rate plan approved by the Mississippi PSC. Two filings are made for each calendar year: the PEP projected filing, which is typically filed prior to the beginning of the year based on a projected revenue requirement, and the PEP lookback filing, which is filed after the end of the year and allows for review of the actual revenue requirement compared to the projected filing.
On February 7, 2018, Mississippi Power revised its annual projected PEP filing for 2018 to reflect the impacts of the Tax Reform Legislation. The revised filing requested an increase of $26 million in annual revenues, based on a performance adjusted ROE of 9.33% and an increased equity ratio of 55%. On July 27, 2018, Mississippi Power and the MPUS entered into a settlement agreement with respect to the 2018 PEP filing and all unresolved PEP filings for prior years (PEP Settlement Agreement), which was approved by the Mississippi PSC on August 7, 2018. Rates under the PEP Settlement Agreement became effective with the first billing cycle of September 2018. The PEP Settlement Agreement provides for an increase of approximately $21.6 million in annual base retail revenues, which excludes certain compensation costs contested by the MPUS, as well as approximately $2 million which was subsequently approved for recovery through Mississippi Power's 2018 Energy Efficiency Cost Rider.
Pursuant to the PEP Settlement Agreement, Mississippi Power's performance-adjusted allowed ROE is 9.31% and its allowed equity ratio is capped at 51%, pending further review by the Mississippi PSC. In lieu of the requested equity ratio increase, Mississippi Power retained $44 million of excess accumulated deferred income taxes resulting from the Tax Reform Legislation until the conclusion of Mississippi Power's next base rate case, which is scheduled to be filed in the fourth quarter 2019 (Mississippi Power 2019 Base Rate Case). Further, Mississippi Power agreed to seek equity contributions sufficient to restore its equity ratio to 50% by December 31, 2018.
Pursuant to the PEP Settlement Agreement, PEP proceedings are suspended until after the conclusion of the Mississippi Power 2019 Base Rate Case and Mississippi Power is not required to make any PEP filings for regulatory years 2018, 2019, and 2020. The PEP Settlement Agreement also resolved all open PEP filings with no change to customer rates.
Kemper County Energy Facility
In 2018, Mississippi Power recorded pre-tax charges to income of $37 million ($27 million after tax), primarily resulting from the abandonment and related closure activities and ongoing period costs, net of sales proceeds, for the mine and gasifier-related assets at the Kemper County energy facility. In addition, Mississippi Power recorded a credit to earnings of $95 million in the fourth quarter 2018 primarily resulting from the reduction of a valuation allowance for a state income tax net operating loss (NOL) carryforward associated with the Kemper County energy facility. Additional closure costs for the mine and gasifier-related assets, currently estimated at up to $10 million pre-tax (excluding salvage, net of dismantlement costs), may be incurred through the first half of 2020. In addition, period costs, including, but not limited to, costs for compliance and safety, ARO accretion, and property taxes for the mine and gasifier-related assets, are estimated to total $11 million in 2019 and $2 million to $4 million annually in

MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS (continued)
Southern Company and Subsidiary Companies 2018 Annual Report


2020 through 2023. Mississippi Power is currently evaluating its options regarding the final disposition of the CO2 pipeline, including removal of the pipeline. This evaluation is expected to be complete later in 2019. If Mississippi Power ultimately decides to remove the CO2 pipeline, the cost of removal could have a material impact on Southern Company's financial statements. The ultimate outcome of these matters cannot be determined at this time.
The combined cycle and associated common facilities portions of the Kemper County energy facility were dedicated as Plant Ratcliffe on April 27, 2018.
For additional information on the Kemper County energy facility, see Note 2 to the financial statements under "Mississippi PowerKemper County Energy Facility."
Reserve Margin Plan
On August 6, 2018, Mississippi Power filed its proposed Reserve Margin Plan (RMP), as required by the Mississippi PSC's order in the docket established for the purposes of pursuing a global settlement of the costs related to the Kemper County energy facility. Under the RMP, Mississippi Power proposed alternatives that would reduce its reserve margin, with the most economic of the alternatives being the two-year and seven-year acceleration of the retirement of Plant Watson Units 4 and 5, respectively, to the first quarter 2022 and the four-year acceleration of the retirement of Plant Greene County Units 1 and 2 to the third quarter 2021 and the third quarter 2022, respectively, in order to lower or avoid operating costs. The Plant Greene County unit retirements would require the completion by Alabama Power of proposed transmission and system reliability improvements, as well as agreement by Alabama Power. The RMP filing also states that, in the event the Mississippi PSC ultimately approves an alternative that includes an accelerated retirement, Mississippi Power would require authorization to defer in a regulatory asset for future recovery the remaining net book value of the units at the time of retirement. A decision by the Mississippi PSC that does not include recovery of the remaining book value of any generating units retired could have a material impact on Southern Company's financial statements. The ultimate outcome of this matter cannot be determined at this time.
Government Grants
In 2010, the DOE, through a cooperative agreement with SCS, agreed to fund $270 million of the Kemper County energy facility through the grants awarded to the project by the DOE under the Clean Coal Power Initiative Round 2. Through December 31, 2018, Mississippi Power received total DOE grants of $387 million, of which $382 million reduced the construction costs of the Kemper County energy facility and $5 million reimbursed Mississippi Power for expenses associated with DOE reporting. On December 12, 2018, Mississippi Power filed with the DOE its request for property closeout certification under the contract related to the grants received. Mississippi Power and the DOE are currently in discussions regarding the requested closeout and property disposition, which may require payment to the DOE for a portion of certain property that is to be retained by Mississippi Power. The ultimate outcome of this matter cannot be determined at this time; however, it could have a significant impact on Southern Company's financial statements.
Southern Company Gas
The natural gas distribution utilities are subject to regulation and oversight by their respective state regulatory agencies for the rates charged to their customers and other matters.
The natural gas market for Atlanta Gas Light was deregulated in 1997. Accordingly, Marketers, rather than a traditional utility, sell natural gas to end-use customers in Georgia and handle customer billing functions. Atlanta Gas Light earns revenue for its distribution services by charging rates to its customers based primarily on monthly fixed charges that are set by the Georgia PSC and adjusted periodically.
With the exception of Atlanta Gas Light, the natural gas distribution utilities are authorized by the relevant regulatory agencies in the states in which they serve to use natural gas cost recovery mechanisms that adjust rates to reflect changes in the wholesale cost of natural gas and ensure recovery of all costs prudently incurred in purchasing natural gas for customers. Natural gas cost recovery revenues are adjusted for differences in actual recoverable natural gas costs and amounts billed in current regulated rates. Changes in the billing factor will not have a significant effect on revenues or net income, but will affect cash flows. In addition to natural gas cost recovery mechanisms, there are other cost recovery mechanisms, such as regulatory riders, which vary by utility but allow recovery of certain costs, such as those related to infrastructure replacement programs, as well as environmental remediation and energy efficiency plans. See Note 1 to the financial statements under "Cost of Natural Gas" for additional information.

MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS (continued)
Southern Company and Subsidiary Companies 2018 Annual Report


Infrastructure Replacement Programs and Capital Projects
In addition to capital expenditures recovered through base rates by each of the natural gas distribution utilities, Nicor Gas and Virginia Natural Gas have separate rate riders that provide timely recovery of capital expenditures for specific infrastructure replacement programs. These infrastructure replacement programs and capital projects are risk-based and designed to update and replace cast iron, bare steel, and mid-vintage plastic materials or expand the natural gas distribution systems to improve reliability and meet operational flexibility and growth. The total expected investment under the infrastructure replacement programs for 2019 is $408 million. See Note 2 to the financial statements under "Southern Company GasInfrastructure Replacement Programs and Capital Projects" for additional information.
Rate Proceedings
On February 23, 2018, Atlanta Gas Light revised its annual base rate filing to reflect the impacts of the Tax Reform Legislation and requested a $16 million rate reduction in 2018. On May 15, 2018, the Georgia PSC approved a stipulation for Atlanta Gas Light's annual base rates to remain at the 2017 level for 2018 and 2019, with customer credits of $8 million in each of July 2018 and October 2018 to reflect the impacts of the Tax Reform Legislation. The Georgia PSC maintained Atlanta Gas Light's previously authorized earnings band based on a ROE between 10.55% and 10.95% and increased the allowed equity ratio by 4% to an equity ratio of 55% to address the negative cash flow and credit metric impacts of the Tax Reform Legislation. Additionally, Atlanta Gas Light is required to file a traditional base rate case on or before June 1, 2019 for rates effective January 1, 2020.
On January 31, 2018, the Illinois Commission approved a $137 million increase in Nicor Gas' annual base rate revenues, including $93 million related to the recovery of investments under Nicor Gas' infrastructure program, effective February 8, 2018, based on a ROE of 9.8%.
On May 2, 2018, the Illinois Commission approved Nicor Gas' rehearing request for revised base rates to incorporate the reduction in the federal income tax rate as a result of the Tax Reform Legislation. The resulting decrease of approximately $44 million in annual base rate revenues became effective May 5, 2018. Nicor Gas' previously-authorized capital structure and ROE of 9.80% were not addressed in the rehearing and remain unchanged. On November 9, 2018, Nicor Gas filed a general base rate case with the Illinois Commission requesting a $230 million increase in annual base rate revenues. The requested increase is based on a projected test year for the 12-month period ending September 30, 2020, a ROE of 10.6%, and an increase in the equity ratio from 52.0% to 54.0% to address the negative cash flow and credit metric impacts of the Tax Reform Legislation. The Illinois Commission is expected to rule on the requested increase within the 11-month statutory time limit, after which rate adjustments will be effective. The ultimate outcome of this matter cannot be determined at this time.
Fuel Cost Recovery
The traditional electric operating companies each have established fuel cost recovery rates approved by their respective state PSCs. Fuel cost recovery revenues are adjusted for differences in actual recoverable fuel costs and amounts billed in current regulated rates. Accordingly, changes in the billing factor will not have a significant effect on Southern Company's revenues or net income, but will affect cash flow. The traditional electric operating companies continuously monitor their under or over recovered fuel cost balances and make appropriate filings with their state PSCs to adjust fuel cost recovery rates as necessary.
See Note 1 to the financial statements under "Revenues" and Note 2 to the financial statements under "Alabama PowerRate ECR," "Georgia PowerFuel Cost Recovery," and "Mississippi PowerFuel Cost Recovery" for additional information.
Construction Program
Overview
The subsidiary companies of Southern Company are engaged in continuous construction programs to accommodate existing and estimated future loads on their respective systems. The Southern Company system intends to continue its strategy of developing and constructing new electric generating facilities, adding environmental modifications to certain existing units, expanding and improving the electric transmission and distribution systems, and updating and expanding the natural gas distribution systems. For the traditional electric operating companies, major generation construction projects are subject to state PSC approval in order to be included in retail rates. While Southern Power generally constructs and acquires generation assets covered by long-term PPAs, any uncontracted capacity could negatively affect future earnings. Southern Company Gas is engaged in various infrastructure improvement programs designed to update or expand the natural gas distribution systems of the natural gas distribution utilities to improve reliability and meet operational flexibility and growth. The natural gas distribution utilities recover their investment and a return associated with these infrastructure programs through their regulated rates. See Note 15 to the financial statements under "Southern Power" for additional information about costs relating to Southern Power's acquisitions that involve construction of renewable energy facilities and Note 2 to the financial statements under "Southern Company GasInfrastructure Replacement

MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS (continued)
Southern Company and Subsidiary Companies 2018 Annual Report


Programs and Capital Projects" for additional information regarding infrastructure improvement programs at the natural gas distribution utilities.
The Southern Company system's construction program is currently estimated to total approximately $8.0 billion, $7.7 billion, $6.7 billion, $6.3 billion, and $6.0 billion for 2019, 2020, 2021, 2022, and 2023, respectively. The largest construction project currently underway in the Southern Company system is Plant Vogtle Units 3 and 4 (45.7% ownership interest by Georgia Power in the two units, each with approximately 1,100 MWs). See FINANCIAL CONDITION AND LIQUIDITY – "Capital Requirements and Contractual Obligations" herein for additional information regarding Southern Company's capital requirements for its subsidiaries' construction programs.
Nuclear Construction
In 2009, the Georgia PSC certified construction of Plant Vogtle Units 3 and 4. Georgia Power holds a 45.7% ownership interest in Plant Vogtle Units 3 and 4. In 2012, the NRC issued the related combined construction and operating licenses, which allowed full construction of the two AP1000 nuclear units (with electric generating capacity of approximately 1,100 MWs each) and related facilities to begin. Until March 2017, construction on Plant Vogtle Units 3 and 4 continued under the Vogtle 3 and 4 Agreement, which was a substantially fixed price agreement. In March 2017, the EPC Contractor filed for bankruptcy protection under Chapter 11 of the U.S. Bankruptcy Code.
In connection with the EPC Contractor's bankruptcy filing, Georgia Power, acting for itself and as agent for the Vogtle Owners, entered into the Interim Assessment Agreement with the EPC Contractor to allow construction to continue. The Interim Assessment Agreement expired in July 2017 when Georgia Power, acting for itself and as agent for the other Vogtle Owners, and the EPC Contractor entered into the Vogtle Services Agreement. Under the Vogtle Services Agreement, Westinghouse provides facility design and engineering services, procurement and technical support, and staff augmentation on a time and materials cost basis. The Vogtle Services Agreement provides that it will continue until the start-up and testing of Plant Vogtle Units 3 and 4 are complete and electricity is generated and sold from both units. The Vogtle Services Agreement is terminable by the Vogtle Owners upon 30 days' written notice.
In October 2017, Georgia Power, acting for itself and as agent for the other Vogtle Owners, executed the Bechtel Agreement, a cost reimbursable plus fee arrangement, whereby Bechtel is reimbursed for actual costs plus a base fee and an at-risk fee, which is subject to adjustment based on Bechtel's performance against cost and schedule targets. Each Vogtle Owner is severally (not jointly) liable for its proportionate share, based on its ownership interest, of all amounts owed to Bechtel under the Bechtel Agreement. The Vogtle Owners may terminate the Bechtel Agreement at any time for their convenience, provided that the Vogtle Owners will be required to pay amounts related to work performed prior to the termination (including the applicable portion of the base fee), certain termination-related costs, and, at certain stages of the work, the applicable portion of the at-risk fee. Bechtel may terminate the Bechtel Agreement under certain circumstances, including certain Vogtle Owner suspensions of work, certain breaches of the Bechtel Agreement by the Vogtle Owners, Vogtle Owner insolvency, and certain other events. Pursuant to the Loan Guarantee Agreement between Georgia Power and the DOE, Georgia Power is required to obtain the DOE's approval of the Bechtel Agreement prior to obtaining any further advances under the Loan Guarantee Agreement.
Cost and Schedule
Georgia Power's approximate proportionate share of the remaining estimated capital cost to complete Plant Vogtle Units 3 and 4 with in serviceby the expected in-service dates of November 2021 and November 2022, respectively, is as follows:
 (in billions)
Project capital cost forecast$7.3
Net investment as of December 31, 2017(3.4)
Remaining estimate to complete$3.9
 (in billions)
Base project capital cost forecast(a)(b)
$8.0
Construction contingency estimate0.4
Total project capital cost forecast(a)(b)
8.4
Net investment as of December 31, 2018(b)
(4.6)
Remaining estimate to complete(a)
$3.8
Note: Excludes financing costs capitalized through AFUDC and is net of payments received under the Guarantee Settlement Agreement and the Customer Refunds.
(a)Excludes financing costs expected to be capitalized through AFUDC of approximately $315 million.
(b)Net of $1.7 billion received from Toshiba under the Guarantee Settlement Agreement and approximately $188 million in related Customer Refunds.
Georgia Power estimates that its financing costs for construction of Plant Vogtle Units 3 and 4 will total approximately $3.1 billion, of which $1.6$1.9 billion had been incurred through December 31, 2017.2018.
As construction continues, challenges with management of contractors, subcontractors, and vendors,vendors; labor productivity, and availability, and/or cost escalation; procurement, fabrication, delivery, assembly, and/or installation and installationtesting, including any

MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS (continued)
Southern Company and Subsidiary Companies 2018 Annual Report


required engineering changes, of plant systems, structures, and components (some of which are based on new technology and have not yet operatedthat only recently began initial operation in the global nuclear industry at this scale),; or other issues could arise and change the projected schedule and estimated cost. Monthly construction production targets required to maintain the current project schedule will continue to increase significantly throughout 2019. To meet these increasing monthly targets, existing craft construction productivity must improve and additional craft laborers must be retained and deployed.
Georgia Power and Southern Nuclear believe it is a leading practice in connection with a construction project of this size and complexity to periodically validate recent construction progress in comparison to the projected schedule and to verify and update quantities of commodities remaining to install, labor productivity, and forecasted staffing needs. This verification process, led by Southern Nuclear, was underway as of December 31, 2018 and is expected to be completed during the second quarter 2019. Georgia Power currently does not anticipate any material changes to the total estimated project capital cost forecast for Plant Vogtle Units 3 and 4 or the expected in-service dates of November 2021 and November 2022, respectively, resulting from this verification process. However, the ultimate impact on cost and schedule, if any, will not be known until the verification process is completed. Georgia Power is required to report the results and any project impacts to the Georgia PSC by May 15, 2019.
There have been technical and procedural challenges to the construction and licensing of Plant Vogtle Units 3 and 4 at the federal and state level and additional challenges may arise. Processes are in place that are designed to assure compliance with the requirements specified in the Westinghouse Design Control Document and the combined construction and operating licenses, including inspections by Southern Nuclear and the NRC that occur throughout construction. As a result of such compliance processes, certain license amendment requests have been filed and approved or are pending before the NRC. Various design and other licensing-based compliance matters, including the timely resolution of Inspections, Tests, Analyses, and Acceptance CriteriaITAAC and the related approvals by the NRC, may arise, which may result in additional license amendments or require other resolution. If any license amendment requests or other licensing-based compliance issues are not resolved in a timely manner, there may be delays in the project schedule that could result in increased costs.
The ultimate outcome of these matters cannot be determined at this time. However, any extension of the project schedule is currently estimated to result in additional base capital costs of approximately $50 million per month, based on Georgia Power's ownership interests, and AFUDC of approximately $12 million per month. While Georgia Power is not precluded from seeking recovery of any future capital cost forecast increase, management will ultimately determine whether or not to seek recovery. Any further changes to the capital cost forecast that are not expected to be recoverable through regulated rates will be required to be charged to income and such charges could be material.
OtherJoint Owner Contracts
In November 2017, the Vogtle Owners entered into an amendment to their joint ownership agreements for Plant Vogtle Units 3 and 4 to provide for, among other conditions, additional Vogtle Owner approval requirements. Effective August 31, 2018, the Vogtle Owners further amended the joint ownership agreements to clarify and provide procedures for certain provisions of the joint ownership agreements related to adverse events that require the vote of the holders of at least 90% of the ownership interests in Plant Vogtle Units 3 and 4 to continue construction (as amended, and together with the November 2017 amendment, the Vogtle Joint Ownership Agreements). The Vogtle Joint Ownership Agreements also confirm that the Vogtle Owners' sole recourse against Georgia Power or Southern Nuclear for any action or inaction in connection with their performance as agent for the Vogtle Owners is limited to removal of Georgia Power and/or Southern Nuclear as agent, except in cases of willful misconduct.
As a result of the increase in the total project capital cost forecast and Georgia Power's decision not to seek rate recovery of the increase in the base capital costs as described below, the holders of at least 90% of the ownership interests in Plant Vogtle Units 3 and 4 were required to vote to continue construction. On September 26, 2018, the Vogtle Owners unanimously voted to continue construction of Plant Vogtle Units 3 and 4.
Amendments to the Vogtle Joint Ownership Agreements
In connection with the vote to continue construction, Georgia Power entered into (i) the Vogtle Owner Term Sheet with the other Vogtle Owners and MEAG's wholly-owned subsidiaries MEAG SPVJ, MEAG Power SPVM, LLC (MEAG SPVM), and MEAG Power SPVP, LLC (MEAG SPVP) to take certain actions which partially mitigate potential financial exposure for the other Vogtle Owners, including additional amendments to the Vogtle Joint Ownership Agreements and the purchase of PTCs from the other Vogtle Owners, and (ii) the MEAG Term Sheet with MEAG and MEAG SPVJ to provide funding with respect to MEAG SPVJ's ownership interest in Plant Vogtle Units 3 and 4 (Project J) under certain circumstances. On January 14, 2019, Georgia Power, MEAG, and MEAG SPVJ entered into an agreement to implement the provisions of the MEAG Term Sheet (MEAG Funding Agreement). On February 18, 2019, Georgia Power, the other Vogtle Owners, and MEAG's wholly-owned subsidiaries MEAG SPVJ, MEAG SPVM, and MEAG SPVP entered into certain amendments to the Vogtle Joint Ownership Agreements to implement the provisions of the Vogtle Owner Term Sheet (Global Amendments).

MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS (continued)
Southern Company and Subsidiary Companies 2018 Annual Report


Pursuant to the Global Amendments, and consistent with the Vogtle Owner Term Sheet, the Vogtle Joint Ownership Agreements were modified as follows: (i) each Vogtle Owner must pay its proportionate share of qualifying construction costs for Plant Vogtle Units 3 and 4 based on its ownership percentage up to the estimated cost at completion (EAC) for Plant Vogtle Units 3 and 4 which formed the basis of Georgia Power's forecast of $8.4 billion in the nineteenth VCM plus $800 million; (ii) Georgia Power will be responsible for 55.7% of actual qualifying construction costs between $800 million and $1.6 billion over the EAC in the nineteenth VCM (resulting in $80 million of potential additional costs to Georgia Power), with the remaining Vogtle Owners responsible for 44.3% of such costs pro rata in accordance with their respective ownership interests; and (iii) Georgia Power will be responsible for 65.7% of qualifying construction costs between $1.6 billion and $2.1 billion over the EAC in the nineteenth VCM (resulting in a further $100 million of potential additional costs to Georgia Power), with the remaining Vogtle Owners responsible for 34.3% of such costs pro rata in accordance with their respective ownership interests.
If the EAC is revised and exceeds the EAC in the nineteenth VCM by more than $2.1 billion, each of the other Vogtle Owners will have a one-time option at the time the project budget forecast is so revised to tender a portion of its ownership interest to Georgia Power in exchange for Georgia Power's agreement to pay 100% of such Vogtle Owner's remaining share of total construction costs in excess of the EAC in the nineteenth VCM plus $2.1 billion. In this event, Georgia Power will have the option of cancelling the project in lieu of purchasing a portion of the ownership interest of any other Vogtle Owner. If Georgia Power accepts the offer to purchase a portion of another Vogtle Owner's ownership interest in Plant Vogtle Units 3 and 4, the ownership interest(s) to be conveyed from the tendering Vogtle Owner(s) to Georgia Power will be calculated based on the proportion of the cumulative amount of construction costs paid by each such tendering Vogtle Owner(s) and by Georgia Power as of the COD of Plant Vogtle Unit 4. For purposes of this calculation, payments made by Georgia Power on behalf of another Vogtle Owner in accordance with the second and third items described in the paragraph above will be treated as payments made by the applicable Vogtle Owner.
In the event the actual costs of construction at completion of a Unit are less than the EAC reflected in the nineteenth VCM report and such Unit is placed in service in accordance with the schedule projected in the nineteenth VCM report (i.e., Plant Vogtle Unit 3 is placed in service by November 2021 or Plant Vogtle Unit 4 is placed in service by November 2022), Georgia Power will be entitled to 60.7% of the cost savings with respect to the relevant Unit and the remaining Vogtle Owners will be entitled to 39.3% of such savings on a pro rata basis in accordance with their respective ownership interests.
For purposes of the foregoing provisions, qualifying construction costs will not include costs (i) resulting from force majeure events, including governmental actions or inactions (or significant delays associated with issuance of such actions) that affect the licensing, completion, start-up, operations, or financing of Plant Vogtle Units 3 and 4, administrative proceedings or litigation regarding ITAAC or other regulatory challenges to commencement of operation of Plant Vogtle Units 3 and 4, and changes in laws or regulations governing Plant Vogtle Units 3 and 4, (ii) legal fees and legal expenses incurred due to litigation with contractors or subcontractors that are not subsidiaries or affiliates of Southern Company, and (iii) additional costs caused by requests from the Vogtle Owners other than Georgia Power, except for the exercise of a right to vote granted under the Vogtle Joint Ownership Agreements, that increase costs by $100,000 or more.
Pursuant to the Global Amendments, and consistent with the Vogtle Owner Term Sheet, the provisions of the Vogtle Joint Ownership Agreements requiring that Vogtle Owners holding 90% of the ownership interests in Plant Vogtle Units 3 and 4 vote to continue construction following certain adverse events (Project Adverse Events) were modified. Pursuant to the Global Amendments, the holders of at least 90% of the ownership interests in Plant Vogtle Units 3 and 4 must vote to continue construction if certain Project Adverse Events occur, including: (i) the bankruptcy of Toshiba; (ii) the termination or rejection in bankruptcy of certain agreements, including the Vogtle Services Agreement, the Bechtel Agreement, or the agency agreement with Southern Nuclear; (iii) Georgia Power publicly announces its intention not to submit for rate recovery any portion of its investment in Plant Vogtle Units 3 and 4 or the Georgia PSC determines that any of Georgia Power's costs relating to the construction of Plant Vogtle Units 3 and 4 will not be recovered in retail rates, excluding any additional amounts paid by Georgia Power on behalf of the other Vogtle Owners pursuant to the Global Amendments described above and the first 6% of costs during any six-month VCM reporting period that are disallowed by the Georgia PSC for recovery, or for which Georgia Power elects not to seek cost recovery, through retail rates; and (iv) an incremental extension of one year or more over the most recently approved schedule. Under the Global Amendments, Georgia Power may cancel the project at any time in its sole discretion.
In addition, pursuant to the Vogtle Joint Ownership Agreements, the required approval of holders of ownership interests in Plant Vogtle Units 3 and 4 is at least (i) 90% for a change of the primary construction contractor and (ii) 67% for material amendments to the Vogtle Services Agreement or agreements with Southern Nuclear or the primary construction contractor, including the Bechtel Agreement.
The Global Amendments provide that if the holders of at least 90% of the ownership interests fail to vote in favor of continuing the project following any future Project Adverse Event, work on Plant Vogtle Units 3 and 4 will continue for a period of 30 days if

MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS (continued)
Southern Company and Subsidiary Companies 2018 Annual Report


the holders of more than 50% of the ownership interests vote in favor of continuing construction (Majority Voting Owners). In such a case, the Vogtle Owners (i) have agreed to negotiate in good faith towards the resumption of the project, (ii) if no agreement is reached during such 30-day period, the project will be cancelled, and (iii) in the event of such a cancellation, the Majority Voting Owners will be obligated to reimburse any other Vogtle Owner for the incremental costs it incurred during such 30-day negotiation period.
Purchase of PTCs During Commercial Operation
Pursuant to the Global Amendments, and consistent with the Vogtle Owner Term Sheet, Georgia Power has agreed to purchase additional PTCs from OPC, Dalton, MEAG SPVM, MEAG SPVP, and MEAG SPVJ (to the extent any MEAG SPVJ PTC rights remain after any purchases required under the MEAG Funding Agreement as described below) at varying purchase prices dependent upon the actual cost to complete construction of Plant Vogtle Units 3 and 4 as compared to the EAC reflected in the nineteenth VCM report. The purchases are at the option of the applicable Vogtle Owner.
Potential Funding to MEAG Project J
Pursuant to the MEAG Funding Agreement, and consistent with the MEAG Term Sheet, if MEAG SPVJ is unable to make its payments due under the Vogtle Joint Ownership Agreements solely as a result of the occurrence of one of the following situations that materially impedes access to capital markets for MEAG for Project J: (i) the conduct of JEA or the City of Jacksonville, such as JEA's legal challenges of its obligations under a PPA with MEAG (PPA-J), or (ii) PPA-J is declared void by a court of competent jurisdiction or rejected by JEA under the applicable provisions of the U.S. Bankruptcy Code (each of (i) and (ii), a JEA Default), at MEAG's request, Georgia Power will purchase from MEAG SPVJ the rights to PTCs attributable to MEAG SPVJ's share of Plant Vogtle Units 3 and 4 (approximately 206 MWs) within 30 days of such request at varying prices dependent upon the stage of construction of Plant Vogtle Units 3 and 4. The aggregate purchase price of the PTCs, together with any advances made as described in the next paragraph, shall not exceed $300 million.
At the option of MEAG, as an alternative or supplement to Georgia Power's purchase of PTCs as described above, Georgia Power has agreed to provide up to $250 million in funding to MEAG for Project J in the form of advances (either advances under the Vogtle Joint Ownership Agreements or the purchase of MEAG Project J bonds, at the discretion of Georgia Power), subject to any required approvals of the Georgia PSC and the DOE.
In the event MEAG SPVJ certifies to Georgia Power that it is unable to fund its obligations under the Vogtle Joint Ownership Agreements as a result of a JEA Default and Georgia Power becomes obligated to provide funding as described above, MEAG is required to (i) assign to Georgia Power its right to vote on any future Project Adverse Event and (ii) diligently pursue JEA for its breach of PPA-J. In addition, Georgia Power agreed that it will not sue MEAG for any amounts due from MEAG SPVJ under MEAG's guarantee of MEAG SPVJ's obligations so long as MEAG SPVJ complies with the terms of the MEAG Funding Agreement as to its payment obligations and the other non-payment provisions of the Vogtle Joint Ownership Agreements.
Under the terms of the MEAG Funding Agreement, Georgia Power may cancel the project in lieu of providing funding in the form of advances or PTC purchases.
The ultimate outcome of these matters cannot be determined at this time.
Regulatory Matters
AsIn 2009, the Georgia PSC voted to certify construction of Plant Vogtle Units 3 and 4 with a certified capital cost of $4.418 billion. In addition, in 2009 the Georgia PSC approved inclusion of the Plant Vogtle Units 3 and 4 related CWIP accounts in rate base, and the State of Georgia enacted the Georgia Nuclear Energy Financing Act, which allows Georgia Power to recover financing costs for Plant Vogtle Units 3 and 4. Financing costs are recovered on all applicable certified costs through annual adjustments to the NCCR tariff up to the certified capital cost of $4.418 billion. At December 31, 2018, Georgia Power had recovered approximately $1.9 billion of financing costs. Financing costs related to capital costs above $4.418 billion will be recovered through AFUDC; however, Georgia Power will not record AFUDC related to any capital costs in excess of the total deemed reasonable by the Georgia PSC (currently $7.3 billion) and not requested for rate recovery. On December 18, 2018, the Georgia PSC approved Georgia Power's request to increase the NCCR tariff by $88 million annually, effective January 1, 2019.
Georgia Power is required to file semi-annual VCM reports with the Georgia PSC by February 28 and August 31 of each year. In 2013, in connection with the eighth VCM report, the Georgia PSC approved a stipulation between Georgia Power and the staff of the Georgia PSC to waive the requirement to amend the Plant Vogtle Units 3 and 4 certificate in accordance with the 2009 certification order until the completion of Plant Vogtle Unit 3, or earlier if deemed appropriate by the Georgia PSC and Georgia Power.

MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS (continued)
Southern Company and Subsidiary Companies 2018 Annual Report


In 2016, the Georgia PSC voted to approve a settlement agreement (Vogtle Cost Settlement Agreement) resolving certain prudency matters in connection with the fifteenth VCM report. In December 2017, the Georgia PSC voted to approve (and issued its related order on January 11, 2018) Georgia Power's seventeenth VCM report, which included a recommendation to continue construction with Southern Nuclear as project manager and Bechtel serving as the primary construction contractor, and modified the Vogtle Cost Settlement Agreement. The Vogtle Cost Settlement Agreement, as modified by the January 11, 2018 order, resolved the following regulatory matters related to Plant Vogtle Units 3 and 4: (i) none of the $3.3 billion of costs incurred through December 31, 2015 and reflected in the fourteenth VCM report should be disallowed from rate base on the basis of imprudence; (ii) the Contractor Settlement Agreement was reasonable and prudent and none of the amounts paid pursuant to the Contractor Settlement Agreement should be disallowed from rate base on the basis of imprudence; (iii) (a) capital costs incurred up to $5.68 billion would be presumed to be reasonable and prudent with the burden of proof on any party challenging such costs, (b) Georgia Power would have the burden to show that any capital costs above $5.68 billion were prudent, and (c) a revised capital cost forecast of $7.3 billion (after reflecting the impact of payments received under the Guarantee Settlement Agreement and related Customer Refunds) was found reasonable; (iv) construction of Plant Vogtle Units 3 and 4 should be completed, with Southern Nuclear serving as project manager and Bechtel as primary contractor; (v) approved and deemed reasonable Georgia Power's revised schedule placing Plant Vogtle Units 3 and 4 in service in November 2021 and November 2022, respectively; (vi) confirmed that the revised cost forecast does not represent a cost cap and that prudence decisions on cost recovery will be made at a later date, consistent with applicable Georgia law; (vii) reduced the ROE used to calculate the NCCR tariff (a) from 10.95% (the ROE rate setting point authorized by the Georgia PSC in the 2013 ARP) to 10.00% effective January 1, 2016, (b) from 10.00% to 8.30%, effective January 1, 2020, and (c) from 8.30% to 5.30%, effective January 1, 2021 (provided that the ROE in no case will be less than Georgia Power's average cost of long-term debt); (viii) reduced the ROE used for AFUDC equity for Plant Vogtle Units 3 and 4 from 10.00% to Georgia Power's average cost of long-term debt, effective January 1, 2018; and (ix) agreed that upon Unit 3 reaching commercial operation, retail base rates would be adjusted to include carrying costs on those capital costs deemed prudent in the Vogtle Cost Settlement Agreement. The January 11, 2018 order also stated that if Plant Vogtle Units 3 and 4 are not commercially operational by June 1, 2021 and June 1, 2022, respectively, the ROE used to calculate the NCCR tariff will be further reduced by 10 basis points each month (but not lower than Georgia Power's average cost of long-term debt) until the respective Unit is commercially operational. The ROE reductions negatively impacted earnings by approximately $100 million, $25 million, and $20 million in 2018, 2017, and 2016, respectively, and are estimated to have negative earnings impacts of approximately $75 million in 2019 and an aggregate of approximately $615 million from 2020 to 2022.
In its January 11, 2018 order, the Georgia PSC also stated if other conditions change and assumptions upon which Georgia Power's seventeenth VCM report are based do not materialize, the Georgia PSC reserved the right to reconsider the decision to continue construction.
On February 12, 2018, Georgia Interfaith Power & Light, Inc. (GIPL) and Partnership for Southern Equity, Inc. (PSE) filed a petition appealing the Georgia PSC's January 11, 2018 order with the Fulton County Superior Court. On March 8, 2018, Georgia Watch filed a similar appeal to the Fulton County Superior Court for judicial review of the Georgia PSC's decision and denial of Georgia Watch's motion for reconsideration. On December 21, 2018, the Fulton County Superior Court granted Georgia Power's motion to dismiss the two appeals. On January 9, 2019, GIPL, PSE, and Georgia Watch filed an appeal of this decision with the Georgia Court of Appeals. Georgia Power believes the appeal has no merit; however, an adverse outcome in the appeal combined with subsequent adverse action by the Georgia PSC could have a material impact on Southern Company's results of operations, financial condition, and liquidity.
In preparation for its nineteenth VCM filing, Georgia Power requested Southern Nuclear to perform a full cost reforecast for the project. This reforecast, performed prior to the nineteenth VCM filing, resulted in a $0.7 billion increase to the base capital cost forecast reported in the second quarter 2018. This base cost increase primarily resulted from changed assumptions related to the finalization of contract scopes and management responsibilities for Bechtel and over 60 subcontractors, labor productivity rates, and craft labor incentives, as well as the related levels of project management, oversight, and support, including field supervision and engineering support.
Although Georgia Power believes these incremental costs are reasonable and necessary to complete the project and the Georgia PSC's order in the seventeenth VCM proceeding specifically states that the construction of Plant Vogtle Units 3 and 4 is not subject to a cost cap, Georgia Power did not seek rate recovery for these cost increases included in the current base capital cost forecast (or any related financing costs) in the nineteenth VCM report. In connection with future VCM filings, Georgia Power may request the Georgia PSC to evaluate costs currently included in the construction contingency estimate for rate recovery as and when they are appropriately included in the base capital cost forecast. After considering the significant level of uncertainty that exists regarding the future recoverability of costs included in the construction contingency estimate since the ultimate outcome of these matters is subject to the outcome of future assessments by management, as well as Georgia PSC decisions in these future regulatory proceedings, Georgia Power recorded a total pre-tax charge to income of $1.1 billion ($0.8 billion after

MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS (continued)
Southern Company and Subsidiary Companies 2018 Annual Report


tax) in the second quarter 2018, which includes the total increase in the base capital cost forecast and construction contingency estimate.
On August 31, 2018, Georgia Power filed its nineteenth VCM report with the Georgia PSC, which requested approval of $578 million of construction capital costs incurred from January 1, 2018 through June 30, 2018. On February 19, 2019, the Georgia PSC approved the nineteenth VCM, but deferred approval of $51.6 million of expenditures related to Georgia Power's portion of an administrative claim filed in the Westinghouse bankruptcy proceedings. Through the nineteenth VCM, the Georgia PSC has approved total construction capital costs incurred through June 30, 2018 of $5.4 billion (before $1.7 billion of payments received under the Guarantee Settlement Agreement and approximately $188 million in related Customer Refunds). In addition, the staff of the Georgia PSC requested, and Georgia Power agreed, to file its twentieth VCM report concurrently with the twenty-first VCM report by August 31, 2019.
The ultimate outcome of these matters cannot be determined at this time.
DOE Financing
At December 31, 2018, Georgia Power had borrowed $2.6 billion related to Plant Vogtle Units 3 and 4 costs through the Loan Guarantee Agreement and a multi-advance credit facility among Georgia Power, the DOE, and the FFB, which provides for borrowings of up to $3.46 billion, subject to the satisfaction of certain conditions. OnIn September 28, 2017, the DOE issued a conditional commitment to Georgia Power for up to approximately $1.67 billion in additional guaranteed loans under the Loan Guarantee Agreement. ThisIn September 2018, the DOE extended the conditional commitment expires on June 30, 2018, subject to anyMarch 31, 2019. Any further extension must be approved by the DOE. Final approval and issuance of these additional loan guarantees by the DOE cannot be assured and are subject to the negotiation of definitive agreements, completion of due diligence by the DOE, receipt of any necessary regulatory approvals, and satisfaction of other conditions. See Note 68 to the financial statements under "Long-term DebtDOE Loan Guarantee Borrowings" for additional information, including applicable covenants, events of default, mandatory prepayment events (including any decision not to continue construction of Plant Vogtle Units 3 and 4), and conditions to borrowing.
The ultimate outcome of these matters cannot be determined at this time.
Income Tax Matters
Federal Tax Reform Legislation
In December 2017, the Tax Reform Legislation was signed into law and became effective on January 1, 2018. The Tax Reform Legislation, among other things, reduced the federal corporate income tax rate to 21%, retained normalization provisions for public utility property and existing renewable energy incentives, and repealed the corporate alternative minimum tax. In addition, under the Tax Reform Legislation, NOLs generated after December 31, 2017 can no longer be carried back to previous tax years but can be carried forward indefinitely, with utilization limited to 80% of taxable income of the subsequent tax year. The projected reduction of the consolidated income tax liability resulting from the tax rate reduction also delays the expected utilization of existing tax credit carryforwards.
Following the enactment of the Tax Reform Legislation, the SEC staff issued Staff Accounting Bulletin 118 – "Income Tax Accounting Implications of the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act" (SAB 118), which provided for a measurement period of up to one year from the enactment date to complete accounting under GAAP for the tax effects of the legislation. Due to the complex and comprehensive nature of the enacted tax law changes and their application under GAAP, Southern Company considered all amounts recorded in the financial statements as a result of the Tax Reform Legislation "provisional" as discussed in SAB 118 and subject to revision prior to filing its 2017 tax return in the fourth quarter 2018. Southern Company recognized tax benefits of $30 million and $264 million in 2018 and 2017, respectively, for a total net tax benefit of $294 million as a result of the Tax Reform Legislation. In addition, in total, Southern Company recorded a $417 million decrease in regulatory assets and a $6.2 billion increase in regulatory liabilities as a result of the Tax Reform Legislation and $16 million of stranded excess deferred tax balances in AOCI at December 31, 2017 were adjusted through retained earnings in 2018. As of December 31, 2018, Southern Company considered the measurement of impacts from the Tax Reform Legislation on deferred income tax assets and liabilities, primarily due to the impact of the reduction of the corporate income tax rate, to be complete.
However, the IRS continues to issue regulations that provide further interpretation and guidance on the law and each state's adoption of the provisions contained in the Tax Reform Legislation remains uncertain. In addition, the regulatory treatment of certain impacts of the Tax Reform Legislation is subject to the discretion of the FERC and each state's regulatory commission. The ultimate impact of these matters cannot be determined at this time. See Note 2 to the financial statements for additional information regarding the traditional electric operating companies' and the natural gas distribution utilities' rate filings, including

MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS (continued)
Southern Company and Subsidiary Companies 2018 Annual Report


amounts returned to customers during 2018, to reflect the impacts of the Tax Reform Legislation. Also see FINANCIAL CONDITION AND LIQUIDITY – "Credit Rating Risk" herein and Note 10 to the financial statements under "Current and Deferred Income Taxes" for additional information.
Bonus Depreciation
Under the Tax Reform Legislation, projects with binding contracts prior to September 28, 2017 and placed in service after September 27, 2017 remain eligible for bonus depreciation under the PATH Act. The PATH Act allowed for 50% bonus depreciation for 2015 through 2017, 40% bonus depreciation for 2018, and 30% bonus depreciation for 2019 and certain long-lived assets placed in service in 2020. Based on provisional estimates, bonus depreciation is expected to result in positive cash flows of approximately $300 million for the 2018 tax year and approximately $130 million for the 2019 tax year. The ultimate outcome of this matter cannot be determined at this time.
Tax Credits
The Tax Reform Legislation retained the renewable energy incentives that were included in the PATH Act. The PATH Act allows for 30% ITC for solar projects that commence construction by December 31, 2019; 26% ITC for solar projects that commence construction in 2020; 22% ITC for solar projects that commence construction in 2021; and a permanent 10% ITC for solar projects that commence construction on or after January 1, 2022. In addition, the PATH Act allows for 100% PTC for wind projects that commenced construction in 2016; 80% PTC for wind projects that commenced construction in 2017; 60% PTC for wind projects that commenced construction in 2018 and 40% PTC for wind projects that commence construction in 2019. Wind projects commencing construction after 2019 will not be entitled to any PTCs. Southern Company has received ITCs and PTCs in connection with investments in solar, wind, and biomass facilities primarily at Southern Power and Georgia Power. See Note 1 to the financial statements under "Income Taxes" and Note 10 to the financial statements under "Current and Deferred Income TaxesTax Credit Carryforwards" for additional information regarding the utilization and amortization of credits and the tax benefit related to basis differences.
Other Matters
Southern Company and its subsidiaries are involved in various other matters being litigated and regulatory matters that could affect future earnings. In addition, Southern Company and its subsidiaries are subject to certain claims and legal actions arising in the ordinary course of business. The business activities of Southern Company's subsidiaries are subject to extensive governmental regulation related to public health and the environment, such as laws and regulations governing air, water, land, and protection of other natural resources. Litigation over environmental issues and claims of various types, including property damage, personal injury, common law nuisance, and citizen enforcement of environmental laws and regulations, has occurred throughout the U.S. This litigation has included claims for damages alleged to have been caused by CO2 and other emissions, CCR, and alleged exposure to hazardous materials, and/or requests for injunctive relief in connection with such matters.
The ultimate outcome of such pending or potential litigation or regulatory matters cannot be predicted at this time; however, for current proceedings not specifically reported herein or in Notes 2 and 3 to the financial statements, management does not anticipate that the ultimate liabilities, if any, arising from such current proceedings would have a material effect on Southern Company's financial statements. See Notes 2 and 3 to the financial statements for a discussion of various other contingencies, regulatory matters, and other matters being litigated which may affect future earnings potential.
Litigation
In January 2017, a putative securities class action complaint was filed against Southern Company, certain of its officers, and certain former Mississippi Power officers in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Georgia, Atlanta Division, by Monroe County Employees' Retirement System on behalf of all persons who purchased shares of Southern Company's common stock between April 25, 2012 and October 29, 2013. The complaint alleges that Southern Company, certain of its officers, and certain former Mississippi Power officers made materially false and misleading statements regarding the Kemper County energy facility in violation of certain provisions under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. The complaint seeks, among other things, compensatory damages and litigation costs and attorneys' fees. In June 2017, the plaintiffs filed an amended complaint that provided additional detail about their claims, increased the purported class period by one day, and added certain other former Mississippi Power officers as defendants. In July 2017, the defendants filed a motion to dismiss the plaintiffs' amended complaint with prejudice, to which the plaintiffs filed an opposition in September 2017. On March 29, 2018, the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Georgia, Atlanta Division, issued an order granting, in part, the defendants' motion to dismiss. The court dismissed certain claims against certain officers of Southern Company and Mississippi Power and dismissed the allegations related to a number of the statements that plaintiffs challenged as being false or misleading. On April 26, 2018, the

MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS (continued)
Southern Company and Subsidiary Companies 2018 Annual Report


defendants filed a motion for reconsideration of the court's order, seeking dismissal of the remaining claims in the lawsuit. On August 10, 2018, the court denied the motion for reconsideration and denied a motion to certify the issue for interlocutory appeal.
In February 2017, Jean Vineyard filed a shareholder derivative lawsuit and, in May 2017, Judy Mesirov filed a shareholder derivative lawsuit, each in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Georgia. Each of these lawsuits names as defendants Southern Company, certain of its directors, certain of its officers, and certain former Mississippi Power officers. In August 2017, these two shareholder derivative lawsuits were consolidated in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Georgia. The complaints allege that the defendants caused Southern Company to make false or misleading statements regarding the Kemper County energy facility cost and schedule. Further, the complaints allege that the defendants were unjustly enriched and caused the waste of corporate assets and also allege that the individual defendants violated their fiduciary duties. Each plaintiff seeks to recover, on behalf of Southern Company, unspecified actual damages and, on each plaintiff's own behalf, attorneys' fees and costs in bringing the lawsuit. Each plaintiff also seeks certain changes to Southern Company's corporate governance and internal processes. On April 25, 2018, the court entered an order staying this lawsuit until 30 days after the resolution of any dispositive motions or any settlement, whichever is earlier, in the putative securities class action.
In May 2017, Helen E. Piper Survivor's Trust filed a shareholder derivative lawsuit in the Superior Court of Gwinnett County, State of Georgia that names as defendants Southern Company, certain of its directors, certain of its officers, and certain former Mississippi Power officers. The complaint alleges that the individual defendants, among other things, breached their fiduciary duties in connection with schedule delays and cost overruns associated with the construction of the Kemper County energy facility. The complaint further alleges that the individual defendants authorized or failed to correct false and misleading statements regarding the Kemper County energy facility schedule and cost and failed to implement necessary internal controls to prevent harm to Southern Company. The plaintiff seeks to recover, on behalf of Southern Company, unspecified actual damages and disgorgement of profits and, on its behalf, attorneys' fees and costs in bringing the lawsuit. The plaintiff also seeks certain unspecified changes to Southern Company's corporate governance and internal processes. On May 4, 2018, the court entered an order staying this lawsuit until 30 days after the resolution of any dispositive motions or any settlement, whichever is earlier, in the putative securities class action.
On May 18, 2018, Southern Company and Mississippi Power received a notice of dispute and arbitration demand filed by Martin Product Sales, LLC (Martin) based on two agreements, both related to Kemper IGCC byproducts for which Mississippi Power provided termination notices in September 2017. Martin alleges breach of contract, breach of good faith and fair dealing, fraud and misrepresentation, and civil conspiracy and makes a claim for damages in the amount of approximately $143 million, as well as additional unspecified damages, attorney's fees, costs, and interest. In the first quarter 2019, Mississippi Power and Southern Company filed motions to dismiss.
Southern Company believes these legal challenges have no merit; however, an adverse outcome in any of these proceedings could have an impact on Southern Company's results of operations, financial condition, and liquidity. Southern Company will vigorously defend itself in these matters, the ultimate outcome of which cannot be determined at this time.
Investments in Leveraged Leases
A subsidiary of Southern Holdings has several leveraged lease agreements, with original terms ranging up to 45 years, which relate to international and domestic energy generation, distribution, and transportation assets. Southern Company receives federal income tax deductions for depreciation and amortization, as well as interest on long-term debt related to these investments. Southern Company reviews all important lease assumptions at least annually, or more frequently if events or changes in circumstances indicate that a change in assumptions has occurred or may occur. These assumptions include the effective tax rate, the residual value, the credit quality of the lessees, and the timing of expected tax cash flows. See Note 1 to the financial statements under "Leveraged Leases" for additional information.
The ability of the lessees to make required payments to the Southern Holdings subsidiary is dependent on the operational performance of the assets. In 2017, the financial and operational performance of one of the lessees and the associated generation assets raised significant concerns about the short-term ability of the generation assets to produce cash flows sufficient to support ongoing operations and the lessee's contractual obligations and its ability to make the remaining semi-annual lease payments to the Southern Holdings subsidiary beginning in June 2018. As a result of operational improvements in 2018, the 2018 lease payments were paid in full. However, operational issues and the resulting cash liquidity challenges persist and significant concerns continue regarding the lessee's ability to make the remaining semi-annual lease payments. These operational challenges may also impact the expected residual value of the assets at the end of the lease term in 2047. If any future lease payment is not paid in full, the Southern Holdings subsidiary may be unable to make its corresponding payment to the holders of the underlying non-recourse debt related to the generation assets. Failure to make the required payment to the debtholders could represent an event of default that would give the debtholders the right to foreclose on, and take ownership of, the generation assets from the

MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS (continued)
Southern Company and Subsidiary Companies 2018 Annual Report


Southern Holdings subsidiary, in effect terminating the lease and resulting in the write-off of the related lease receivable, which would result in a reduction in net income of approximately $86 million after tax based on the lease receivable balance at December 31, 2018. Southern Company has evaluated the recoverability of the lease receivable and the expected residual value of the generation assets at the end of the lease under various scenarios and has concluded that its investment in the leveraged lease is not impaired at December 31, 2018. Southern Company will continue to monitor the operational performance of the underlying assets and evaluate the ability of the lessee to continue to make the required lease payments. The ultimate outcome of this matter cannot be determined at this time.
Mississippi Power
In conjunction with Southern Company's sale of Gulf Power, Mississippi Power and Gulf Power have committed to seek a restructuring of their 50% undivided ownership interests in Plant Daniel such that each of them would, after the restructuring, own 100% of a generating unit. On January 15, 2019, Gulf Power provided notice to Mississippi Power that Gulf Power will retire its share of the generating capacity of Plant Daniel on January 15, 2024. Mississippi Power has the option to purchase Gulf Power's ownership interest for $1 on January 15, 2024, provided that Mississippi Power exercises the option no later than 120 days prior to that date. Mississippi Power is assessing the potential operational and economic effects of Gulf Power's notice. The ultimate outcome of these matters remains subject to completion of Mississippi Power's evaluations and applicable regulatory approvals, including the FERC and the Mississippi PSC, and cannot now be determined. See Note 15 to the financial statements under "Southern Company's Sale of Gulf Power" for information regarding the sale of Gulf Power.
Southern Power
On January 29, 2019, Pacific Gas & Electric Company (PG&E) filed petitions to reorganize under Chapter 11 of the U.S. Bankruptcy Code. Southern Power, together with its noncontrolling partners, owns four solar facilities where PG&E is the energy off-taker for approximately 207 MWs of capacity under long-term PPAs. PG&E is also the transmission provider for these facilities and two of Southern Power's other solar facilities. Southern Power has evaluated the recoverability of its investments in these solar facilities under various scenarios, including selling the related energy into the competitive markets, and has concluded they are not impaired. At December 31, 2018, Southern Power had outstanding accounts receivables due from PG&E of $1 million related to the PPAs and $36 million related to the transmission interconnections. Southern Company does not expect a material impact to its financial statements if, as a result of the bankruptcy proceedings, PG&E does not perform in accordance with the PPAs or the terms of the PPAs are renegotiated; however, the ultimate outcome of this matter cannot be determined at this time.
Southern Company Gas
A wholly-owned subsidiary of Southern Company Gas owns and operates a natural gas storage facility consisting of two salt dome caverns in Louisiana. Periodic integrity tests are required in accordance with rules of the Louisiana Department of Natural

NOTES (continued)
Southern Company and Subsidiary Companies 2017 Annual Report

Resources (DNR). In August 2017, in connection with an ongoing integrity project, updated seismic mapping indicated the proximity of one of the caverns to the edge of the salt dome may be less than the required minimum and could result in Southern Company Gas retiring the cavern early. At December 31, 2017,2018, the facility's property, plant, and equipment had a net book value of $112$109 million, of which the cavern itself represents approximately 20%. A potential early retirement of this cavern is dependent upon several factors including compliance with an order from the Louisiana DNR detailing the requirements to place the cavern back in service, which includes, among other things, obtaining core samples to determine the composition of the sheath surrounding the edge of the salt dome.
The cavern continues to maintain its pressures and overall structural integrity. Southern Company Gas intends to monitor the cavern and comply with the Louisiana DNR order through 2020 and place the cavern back in service in 2021. These events were considered in connection with Southern Company Gas' annual long-lived asset impairment analysis, which determined there was no impairment as of December 31, 2017.2018. Any changes in results of monitoring activities, rates at which expiring capacity contracts are re-contracted, timing of placing the cavern back in service, or Louisiana DNR requirements could trigger impairment. Further, early retirement of the cavern could trigger impairment of other long-lived assets associated with the natural gas storage facility. The ultimate outcome of this matter cannot be determined at this time, but could have a significant impact on Southern Company's financial statements.
4. JOINT OWNERSHIP AGREEMENTSACCOUNTING POLICIES
Alabama Power owns an undivided interest in Units 1Application of Critical Accounting Policies and 2 at Plant Miller and related facilities jointly with PowerSouth Energy Cooperative, Inc. Georgia Power owns undivided interests in Plants Vogtle, Hatch, Wansley, and Scherer in varying amounts jointly with one or more of the following entities: Oglethorpe Power Corporation (OPC), MEAG Power, the City of Dalton, Georgia, acting by and through its Board of Water, Light, and Sinking Fund Commissioners, doing business as Dalton Utilities, Florida Power & Light Company, and Jacksonville Electric Authority. In addition, Georgia Power has joint ownership agreements with OPC for the Rocky Mountain facilities. In August 2016, Georgia Power sold its 33% ownership interest in the Intercession City combustion turbine unit to Duke Energy Florida, LLC. Southern Power owns an undivided interest in Plant Stanton Unit A and related facilities jointly with the Orlando Utilities Commission, Kissimmee Utility Authority, and Florida Municipal Power Agency. Southern Company Gas has a 50% undivided ownership interest in the Dalton Pipeline jointly with The Williams Companies, Inc.
At December 31, 2017, Alabama Power's, Georgia Power's, Southern Power's, and Southern Company Gas' percentage ownership and investment (exclusive of nuclear fuel) in jointly-owned facilities in commercial operation with the above entities were as follows:
Facility (Type)
Percent
Ownership
 Plant in Service 
Accumulated
Depreciation
 CWIP
   (in millions)
Plant Vogtle (nuclear) Units 1 and 245.7% $3,564
 $2,141
 $70
Plant Hatch (nuclear)50.1
 1,321
 595
 87
Plant Miller (coal) Units 1 and 291.8
 1,717
 619
 54
Plant Scherer (coal) Units 1 and 28.4
 261
 93
 8
Plant Wansley (coal)53.5
 1,053
 335
 72
Rocky Mountain (pumped storage)25.4
 182
 132
 
Plant Stanton (combined cycle) Unit A65.0
 155
 55
 
Dalton Pipeline (natural gas pipeline)50.0
 241
 2
 13
Georgia Power also owns 45.7% of Plant Vogtle Units 3 and 4, which are currently under construction and had a CWIP balance of $3.3 billion as of December 31, 2017. See Note 3 under "Nuclear Construction" for additional information.
Alabama Power and Georgia Power have contracted to operate and maintain their jointly-owned facilities, except for Rocky Mountain, as agents for their respective co-owners. Southern Power has a service agreement with SCS whereby SCS is responsible for the operation and maintenance of Plant Stanton Unit A. The companies' proportionate share of their plant operating expenses is included in the corresponding operating expenses in the statements of income and each company is responsible for providing its own financing.Estimates
Southern Company Gas entered into an agreementprepares its consolidated financial statements in accordance with GAAP. Significant accounting policies are described in Notes 1, 5, and 6 to lease its 50% undivided ownership in the Dalton Pipelinefinancial statements. In the application of these policies, certain estimates are made that became effective when it was placed in service on August 1, 2017. Under the lease, Southern Company Gas will receive approximately $26 million annually for an initial term of 25 years. The lessee is responsible for maintaining the pipeline during the lease term and for providing service to transportation customers under its FERC-regulated tariff.may
    Table of Contents                                Index to Financial Statements

NOTESMANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS (continued)
Southern Company and Subsidiary Companies 20172018 Annual Report


5. INCOME TAXEShave a material impact on Southern Company's results of operations and related disclosures. Different assumptions and measurements could produce estimates that are significantly different from those recorded in the financial statements. Senior management has reviewed and discussed the following critical accounting policies and estimates with the Audit Committee of Southern Company's Board of Directors.
Utility Regulation
Southern Company's traditional electric operating companies and natural gas distribution utilities, which collectively comprised approximately 85% of Southern Company's total operating revenues for 2018, are subject to retail regulation by their respective state PSCs or other applicable state regulatory agencies and wholesale regulation by the FERC. These regulatory agencies set the rates the traditional electric operating companies and the natural gas distribution utilities are permitted to charge customers based on allowable costs, including a reasonable ROE. As a result, the traditional electric operating companies and the natural gas distribution utilities apply accounting standards which require the financial statements to reflect the effects of rate regulation. Through the ratemaking process, the regulators may require the inclusion of costs or revenues in periods different than when they would be recognized by a non-regulated company. This treatment may result in the deferral of expenses and the recording of related regulatory assets based on anticipated future recovery through rates or the deferral of gains or creation of liabilities and the recording of related regulatory liabilities. The application of the accounting standards has a further effect on Southern Company's financial statements as a result of the estimates of allowable costs used in the ratemaking process. These estimates may differ from those actually incurred by the traditional electric operating companies and the natural gas distribution utilities; therefore, the accounting estimates inherent in specific costs such as depreciation, AROs, and pension and other postretirement benefits have less of a direct impact on Southern Company's results of operations and financial condition than they would on a non-regulated company. See Note 15 to the financial statements for information regarding the sale of Gulf Power and three of Southern Company Gas' natural gas distribution utilities.
As reflected in Note 2 to the financial statements under "Southern CompanyRegulatory Assets and Liabilities," significant regulatory assets and liabilities have been recorded. Management reviews the ultimate recoverability of these regulatory assets and any requirement to refund these regulatory liabilities based on applicable regulatory guidelines and GAAP. However, adverse legislative, judicial, or regulatory actions could materially impact the amounts of such regulatory assets and liabilities and could adversely impact Southern Company's financial statements.
Estimated Cost, Schedule, and Rate Recovery for the Construction of Plant Vogtle Units 3 and 4
In 2016, the Georgia PSC approved the Vogtle Cost Settlement Agreement, which resolved certain prudency matters in connection with Georgia Power's fifteenth VCM report. In December 2017, the Georgia PSC approved Georgia Power's seventeenth VCM report, which included a recommendation to continue construction of Plant Vogtle Units 3 and 4, with Southern Nuclear serving as project manager and Bechtel serving as the primary construction contractor, as well as a modification of the Vogtle Cost Settlement Agreement. The Georgia PSC's related order stated that under the modified Vogtle Cost Settlement Agreement, (i) none of the $3.3 billion of costs incurred through December 31, 2015 should be disallowed as imprudent; (ii) capital costs incurred up to $5.68 billion would be presumed to be reasonable and prudent with the burden of proof on any party challenging such costs; (iii) Georgia Power would have the burden of proof to show that any capital costs above $5.68 billion were prudent; (iv) Georgia Power's total project capital cost forecast of $7.3 billion (net of $1.7 billion received under the Guarantee Settlement Agreement and approximately $188 million in related Customer Refunds) was found reasonable and did not represent a cost cap; and (v) prudence decisions would be made subsequent to achieving fuel load for Unit 4.
In its order, the Georgia PSC also stated if other conditions change and assumptions upon which Georgia Power's seventeenth VCM report are based do not materialize, the Georgia PSC reserved the right to reconsider the decision to continue construction.
In the second quarter 2018, Georgia Power revised its base cost forecast and estimated contingency to complete construction and start-up of Plant Vogtle Units 3 and 4 to $8.0 billion and $0.4 billion, respectively, for a total project capital cost forecast of $8.4 billion (net of $1.7 billion received under the Guarantee Settlement Agreement and approximately $188 million in related Customer Refunds). Although Georgia Power believes these incremental costs are reasonable and necessary to complete the project and the Georgia PSC's order in the seventeenth VCM proceeding specifically states that the construction of Plant Vogtle Units 3 and 4 is not subject to a cost cap, Georgia Power did not seek rate recovery for the $0.7 billion increase in costs included in the current base capital cost forecast in the nineteenth VCM report. In connection with future VCM filings, Georgia Power may request the Georgia PSC to evaluate costs currently included in the construction contingency estimate for rate recovery as and when they are appropriately included in the base capital cost forecast. After considering the significant level of uncertainty that exists regarding the future recoverability of costs included in the construction contingency estimate since the ultimate outcome of these matters is subject to the outcome of future assessments by management, as well as Georgia PSC decisions in these future

MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS (continued)
Southern Company and Subsidiary Companies 2018 Annual Report


regulatory proceedings, Georgia Power recorded a total pre-tax charge to income of $1.1 billion ($0.8 billion after tax) in the second quarter 2018.
Georgia Power's revised cost estimate reflects an expected in-service date of November 2021 for Unit 3 and November 2022 for Unit 4.
As construction continues, challenges with management of contractors, subcontractors, and vendors; labor productivity, availability, and/or cost escalation; procurement, fabrication, delivery, assembly, and/or installation and testing, including any required engineering changes, of plant systems, structures, and components (some of which are based on new technology that only recently began initial operation in the global nuclear industry at this scale); or other issues could arise and change the projected schedule and estimated cost. Monthly construction production targets required to maintain the current project schedule will continue to increase significantly throughout 2019. To meet these increasing monthly targets, existing craft construction productivity must improve and additional craft laborers must be retained and deployed.
Georgia Power and Southern Nuclear believe it is a leading practice in connection with a construction project of this size and complexity to periodically validate recent construction progress in comparison to the projected schedule and to verify and update quantities of commodities remaining to install, labor productivity, and forecasted staffing needs. This verification process, led by Southern Nuclear, was underway as of December 31, 2018 and is expected to be completed during the second quarter 2019. Georgia Power currently does not anticipate any material changes to the total estimated project capital cost forecast for Plant Vogtle Units 3 and 4 or the expected in-service dates of November 2021 and November 2022, respectively, resulting from this verification process. However, the ultimate impact on cost and schedule, if any, will not be known until the verification process is completed. Georgia Power is required to report the results and any project impacts to the Georgia PSC by May 15, 2019.
There have been technical and procedural challenges to the construction and licensing of Plant Vogtle Units 3 and 4 at the federal and state level and additional challenges may arise. Processes are in place that are designed to assure compliance with the requirements specified in the Westinghouse Design Control Document and the combined construction and operating licenses, including inspections by Southern Nuclear and the NRC that occur throughout construction. As a result of such compliance processes, certain license amendment requests have been filed and approved or are pending before the NRC. Various design and other licensing-based compliance matters, including the timely resolution of ITAAC and the related approvals by the NRC, may arise, which may result in additional license amendments or require other resolution. If any license amendment requests or other licensing-based compliance issues are not resolved in a timely manner, there may be delays in the project schedule that could result in increased costs.
The ultimate outcome of these matters cannot be determined at this time. Any extension of the in-service dates of November 2021 for Unit 3 and November 2022 for Unit 4 is currently estimated to result in additional base capital costs of approximately $50 million per month, based on Georgia Power's ownership interests, and AFUDC of approximately $12 million per month. While Georgia Power is not precluded from seeking recovery of any future capital cost forecast increase, management will ultimately determine whether or not to seek recovery. Any further changes to the capital cost forecast that are not expected to be recoverable through regulated rates will be required to be charged to income and such charges could be material.
Given the significant complexity involved in estimating the future costs to complete construction and start-up of Plant Vogtle Units 3 and 4 and the significant management judgment necessary to assess the related uncertainties surrounding future rate recovery of any projected cost increases, as well as the potential impact on Southern Company's results of operations and cash flows, Southern Company considers these items to be critical accounting estimates. See Note 2 to the financial statements under "Georgia PowerNuclear Construction" for additional information.
Accounting for Income Taxes
The consolidated income tax provision and deferred income tax assets and liabilities, as well as any unrecognized tax benefits and valuation allowances, require significant judgment and estimates. These estimates are supported by historical tax return data, reasonable projections of taxable income, and interpretations of applicable tax laws and regulations across multiple taxing jurisdictions. The effective tax rate reflects the statutory tax rates and calculated apportionments for the various states in which the Southern Company system operates.
Southern Company files a consolidated federal income tax return and various state income tax returns, some of which are combined or unitary. Under a joint consolidated income tax allocation agreement, each Southern Company subsidiary's current and deferred tax expense is computed on a stand-alone basis and no subsidiary is allocated more current expense than would be paid if it filed a separate income tax return. PowerSecureCertain deductions and credits can be limited at the consolidated or combined level resulting in NOL and tax credit carryforwards that would not otherwise result on a stand-alone basis. Utilization of NOL and tax credit carryforwards and the assessment of valuation allowances are based on significant judgment and extensive analysis of

MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS (continued)
Southern Company and Subsidiary Companies 2018 Annual Report


Southern Company's current financial position and result of operations, including currently available information about future years, to estimate when future taxable income will be realized.
Current and deferred state income tax liabilities and assets are estimated based on laws of multiple states that determine the income to be apportioned to their jurisdictions. States utilize various formulas to calculate the apportionment of taxable income, primarily using sales, assets, or payroll within the jurisdiction compared to the consolidated totals. In addition, each state varies as to whether a stand-alone, combined, or unitary filing methodology is required. The calculation of deferred state taxes considers apportionment factors and filing methodologies that are expected to apply in future years. The apportionments and methodologies which are ultimately finalized in a manner inconsistent with expectations could have a material effect on Southern Company's financial statements.
Given the significant judgment involved in estimating NOL and tax credit carryforwards and multi-state apportionments for all subsidiaries, Southern Company considers federal and state deferred income tax liabilities and assets to be critical accounting estimates.
Asset Retirement Obligations
AROs are computed as the fair value of the estimated costs for an asset's future retirement and are recorded in the period in which the liability is incurred. The estimated costs are capitalized as part of the related long-lived asset and depreciated over the asset's useful life. In the absence of quoted market prices, AROs are estimated using present value techniques in which estimates of future cash outlays associated with the asset retirements are discounted using a credit-adjusted risk-free rate. Estimates of the timing and amounts of future cash outlays are based on projections of when and how the assets will be retired and the cost of future removal activities.
The liability for AROs primarily relates to facilities that are subject to the CCR Rule and the related state rules, principally ash ponds, and the decommissioning of the Southern Company system's nuclear facilities – Alabama Power's Plant Farley and Georgia Power's ownership interests in Plant Hatch and Plant Vogtle Units 1 and 2. In addition, the Southern Company system has AROs related to various landfill sites, asbestos removal, mine reclamation, land restoration related to solar and wind facilities, and disposal of polychlorinated biphenyls in certain transformers.
The traditional electric operating companies and Southern Company Gas became participantsalso have identified retirement obligations, such as obligations related to certain electric transmission and distribution facilities, certain asbestos containing material within long-term assets not subject to ongoing repair and maintenance activities, certain wireless communication towers, the disposal of polychlorinated biphenyls in certain transformers, leasehold improvements, equipment on customer property, and property associated with the income tax allocation agreement as of May 9, 2016Southern Company system's rail lines and July 1, 2016, respectively. In accordance with IRS regulations, each company is jointly and severally liablenatural gas pipelines. However, liabilities for the federal tax liability.
Federal Tax Reform Legislation
Followingremoval of these assets have not been recorded as the enactmentfair value of the Tax Reform Legislation, the SEC staff issued Staff Accounting Bulletin 118 – "Income Tax Accounting Implicationsretirement obligations cannot be reasonably estimated. A liability for these retirement obligations will be recognized when sufficient information becomes available to support a reasonable estimation of the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act" (SAB 118), which providesretirement obligation.
The cost estimates for a measurement period of up to one year from the enactment date to complete accounting under GAAP for the tax effects of the legislation. DueAROs related to the complexdisposal of CCR are based on information using various assumptions related to closure and comprehensive naturepost-closure costs, timing of future cash outlays, inflation and discount rates, and the enacted tax lawpotential methods for complying with the CCR Rule. During 2018, Alabama Power and Georgia Power recorded increases of approximately $1.2 billion and $3.1 billion, respectively, to their AROs related to the disposal of CCR and increases of approximately $300 million and $130 million, respectively, to their AROs related to updated nuclear decommissioning cost site studies. Alabama Power's CCR-related update resulted from feasibility studies performed on ash ponds in use at the plants it operates, which indicated that additional closure costs, primarily related to increases in estimated ash volume, water management requirements, and design revisions, will be required to close these ash ponds under the planned closure-in-place methodology. Georgia Power's CCR-related update resulted from a strategic assessment which indicated additional closure costs will be required to close its ash ponds, primarily due to changes in closure strategies, the estimated amount of ash to be excavated, and additional water management requirements necessary to support closure strategies. The traditional electric operating companies expect to periodically update their application under GAAP,ARO cost estimates. See FUTURE EARNINGS POTENTIAL – "Environmental MattersEnvironmental Laws and RegulationsCoal Combustion Residuals" herein and Note 6 to the financial statements for additional information.
Given the significant judgment involved in estimating AROs, Southern Company considers all amountsthe liabilities for AROs to be critical accounting estimates.
Pension and Other Postretirement Benefits
Southern Company's calculation of pension and other postretirement benefits expense is dependent on a number of assumptions. These assumptions include discount rates, healthcare cost trend rates, expected long-term return on plan assets, mortality rates, expected salary and wage increases, and other factors. Components of pension and other postretirement benefits expense include

MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS (continued)
Southern Company and Subsidiary Companies 2018 Annual Report


interest and service cost on the pension and other postretirement benefit plans, expected return on plan assets, and amortization of certain unrecognized costs and obligations. Actual results that differ from the assumptions utilized are accumulated and amortized over future periods and, therefore, generally affect recognized expense and the recorded obligation in future periods. While Southern Company believes that the assumptions used are appropriate, differences in actual experience or significant changes in assumptions would affect its pension and other postretirement benefit costs and obligations.
Key elements in determining Southern Company's pension and other postretirement benefit expense are the expected long-term return on plan assets and the discount rate used to measure the benefit plan obligations and the periodic benefit plan expense for future periods. The expected long-term return on pension and other postretirement benefit plan assets is based on Southern Company's investment strategy, historical experience, and expectations for long-term rates of return that consider external actuarial advice. Southern Company determines the long-term return on plan assets by applying the long-term rate of expected returns on various asset classes to Southern Company's target asset allocation. For purposes of determining its liability related to the pension and other postretirement benefit plans, Southern Company discounts the future related cash flows using a single-point discount rate for each plan developed from the weighted average of market-observed yields for high quality fixed income securities with maturities that correspond to expected benefit payments.
The following table illustrates the sensitivity to changes in Southern Company's long-term assumptions with respect to the discount rate, salary increases, and the long-term rate of return on plan assets:
Change in AssumptionIncrease/(Decrease) in Total Benefit Expense for 2019Increase/(Decrease) in Projected Obligation for Pension Plan at December 31, 2018Increase/(Decrease) in Projected Obligation for Other Postretirement Benefit Plans at December 31, 2018
(in millions)
25 basis point change in discount rate$37/$(36)$434/$(411)$50/$(48)
25 basis point change in salaries$11/$(11)$105/$(101)$–/$–
25 basis point change in long-term return on plan assets$33/$(33)N/AN/A
N/A – Not applicable
See Note 11 to the financial statements for additional information regarding pension and other postretirement benefits.
Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets
The acquisition method of accounting requires the assets acquired and liabilities assumed to be recorded at the date of acquisition at their respective estimated fair values. Southern Company recognizes goodwill as of the acquisition date, as a residual over the fair values of the identifiable net assets acquired. Goodwill is tested for impairment on an annual basis in the financial statementsfourth quarter of the year as well as on an interim basis as events and changes in circumstances occur. Primarily as a result of the Tax Reform Legislationacquisitions of Southern Company Gas and PowerSecure in 2016, goodwill totaled approximately $5.3 billion at December 31, 2018. As a result of the Southern Company Gas Dispositions, goodwill was reduced by $910 million during 2018. In addition, Southern Company Gas recorded a $42 million goodwill impairment charge in 2018 in contemplation of the sale of Pivotal Home Solutions.
Definite-lived intangible assets acquired are amortized over the estimated useful lives of the respective assets to reflect the pattern in which the economic benefits of the intangible assets are consumed. Whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of the intangible assets may not be recoverable, the intangible assets will be reviewed for impairment. Primarily as a result of the acquisitions of Southern Company Gas and PowerSecure and PPA fair value adjustments resulting from Southern Power's acquisitions, other intangible assets, net of amortization totaled approximately $613 million at December 31, 2018.
The judgments made in determining the estimated fair value assigned to each class of assets acquired and liabilities assumed, as well as asset lives, can significantly impact Southern Company's results of operations. Fair values and useful lives are determined based on, among other factors, the expected future period of benefit of the asset, the various characteristics of the asset, and projected cash flows. As the determination of an asset's fair value and useful life involves management making certain estimates and because these estimates form the basis for the determination of whether or not an impairment charge should be recorded, Southern Company considers these estimates to be "provisional" as discussed in SAB 118critical accounting estimates.
See Note 1 to the financial statements under "Goodwill and subject to revision.Other Intangible Assets and Liabilities" for additional information regarding Southern Company is awaiting additional guidance from industryCompany's goodwill and income tax authorities in order to finalize its accounting. The ultimate impact of the Tax Reform Legislation on deferred income taxother intangible assets and liabilities andNote 15 to the related regulatory assets and liabilities cannot be determined at this time. See Note 3 under "Regulatory Matters"financial statements for additional information.
Current and Deferred Income Taxes
Details of income tax provisions are as follows:
 2017 2016 2015
 (in millions)
Federal —     
Current$(62) $1,184
 $(177)
Deferred(6) (342) 1,266
 (68) 842
 1,089
State —     
Current37
 (108) (33)
Deferred173
 217
 138
 210
 109
 105
Total$142
 $951
 $1,194
Net cash payments (refunds) for income taxes in 2017, 2016, and 2015 were $(410) million, $(148) million, and $(9) million, respectively.
    Table of Contents                                Index to Financial Statements

NOTESMANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS (continued)
Southern Company and Subsidiary Companies 20172018 Annual Report


information related to Southern Company's 2016 acquisitions of Southern Company Gas and PowerSecure, as well as the Southern Company Gas Dispositions.
Derivatives and Hedging Activities
Derivative instruments are recorded on the balance sheets as either assets or liabilities measured at their fair value, unless the transactions qualify for the normal purchases or normal sales scope exception and are instead subject to traditional accrual accounting. For those transactions that do not qualify as a normal purchase or normal sale, changes in the derivatives' fair values are recognized concurrently in earnings unless specific hedge accounting criteria are met. If the derivatives meet those criteria, derivative gains and losses offset related results of the hedged item in the income statement in the case of a fair value hedge, or gains and losses are deferred in OCI until the hedged transaction affects earnings in the case of a cash flow hedge. Certain subsidiaries of Southern Company enter into energy-related derivatives that are designated as regulatory hedges where gains and losses are initially recorded as regulatory liabilities and assets and then are included in fuel expense as the underlying fuel is used in operations and ultimately recovered through billings to customers.
Southern Company uses derivative instruments to reduce the impact to the results of operations due to the risk of changes in the price of natural gas, to manage fuel hedging programs per guidelines of state regulatory agencies, and to mitigate residual changes in the price of electricity, weather, interest rates, and foreign currency exchange rates. The tax effectsfair value of temporary differences betweencommodity derivative instruments used to manage exposure to changing prices reflects the carryingestimated amounts that Southern Company would receive or pay to terminate or close the contracts at the reporting date. To determine the fair value of the derivative instruments, Southern Company utilizes market data or assumptions that market participants would use in pricing the derivative asset or liability, including assumptions about risk and the risks inherent in the inputs of the valuation technique.
Southern Company classifies derivative assets and liabilities based on the lowest level of input that is significant to the fair value measurement. The assessment of the significance of a particular input to the fair value measurement requires judgment and may affect the valuation of fair value assets and liabilities and their placement within the fair value hierarchy. The determination of the fair value of the derivative instruments incorporates various required factors. These factors include:
the creditworthiness of the counterparties involved and the impact of credit enhancements (such as cash deposits and letters of credit);
events specific to a given counterparty; and
the impact of Southern Company's nonperformance risk on its liabilities.
Given the assumptions used in pricing the derivative asset or liability, Southern Company considers the valuation of derivative assets and liabilities a critical accounting estimate. See FINANCIAL CONDITION AND LIQUIDITY – "Market Price Risk" herein and Note 14 to the financial statements for more information.
Contingent Obligations
Southern Company is subject to a number of federal and their respective tax bases, which give risestate laws and regulations as well as other factors and conditions that subject it to deferred tax assetsenvironmental, litigation, and liabilities,other risks. See FUTURE EARNINGS POTENTIAL herein and Notes 2 and 3 to the financial statements for more information regarding certain of these contingencies. Southern Company periodically evaluates its exposure to such risks and records reserves for those matters where a non-tax-related loss is considered probable and reasonably estimable. The adequacy of reserves can be significantly affected by external events or conditions that can be unpredictable; thus, the ultimate outcome of such matters could materially affect Southern Company's results of operations, cash flows, or financial condition.
Recently Issued Accounting Standards
See Note 1 to the financial statements under "Recently Adopted Accounting Standards" for additional information.
In 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-02, Leases (Topic 842) (ASU 2016-02). ASU 2016-02 requires lessees to recognize on the balance sheet a lease liability and a right-of-use asset for all leases. ASU 2016-02 also changes the recognition, measurement, and presentation of expense associated with leases and provides clarification regarding the identification of certain components of contracts that would represent a lease. The accounting required by lessors is relatively unchanged and there is no change to the accounting for existing leveraged leases. ASU 2016-02 is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2018 and Southern Company adopted the new standard effective January 1, 2019.
Southern Company elected the transition methodology provided by ASU No. 2018-11, Leases (Topic 842): Targeted Improvements, whereby the requirements of ASU 2016-02 are applied on a prospective basis as follows:
 2017 2016
 (in millions)
Deferred tax liabilities —   
Accelerated depreciation$10,267
 $15,392
Property basis differences955
 2,708
Leveraged lease basis differences251
 314
Employee benefit obligations516
 737
Premium on reacquired debt54
 89
Regulatory assets associated with employee benefit obligations1,046
 1,584
Regulatory assets associated with AROs1,225
 1,781
Other697
 907
Total15,011
 23,512
Deferred tax assets —   
Federal effect of state deferred taxes326
 597
Employee benefit obligations1,307
 1,868
Over recovered fuel clause
 66
Other property basis differences446
 401
Deferred costs69
 100
ITC carryforward2,420
 1,974
Federal NOL carryforward518
 1,084
Unbilled revenue57
 92
Other comprehensive losses84
 152
AROs1,197
 1,732
Estimated Loss on Kemper IGCC722
 484
Deferred state tax assets328
 266
Regulatory liability associated with the Tax Reform Legislation (not subject to normalization)465
 
Other485
 679
Total8,424
 9,495
Valuation allowance(149) (23)
Total deferred income taxes6,736
 14,040
Portion included in accumulated deferred tax assets(106) (52)
Accumulated deferred income taxes$6,842
 $14,092
The implementation of the Tax Reform Legislation significantly reduced accumulated deferred income taxes, partially offsetadoption date of January 1, 2019, without restating prior periods. Southern Company elected the package of practical expedients provided by bonus depreciation provisions in the Protecting Americans from Tax Hikes Act. The Tax Reform Legislation also significantly reduced tax-related regulatory assets and increased tax-related regulatory liabilities.
At December 31, 2017, the tax-related regulatory assets to be recovered from customers were $825 million. These assets are primarily attributable to tax benefits flowed through to customers in prior years, deferred taxes previously recognized at rates lower than the current enacted tax law, and taxes applicable to capitalized interest.
At December 31, 2017, the tax-related regulatory liabilities to be credited to customers were $7.3 billion. These liabilities are primarily attributable to deferred taxes previously recognized at rates higher than the current enacted tax law and to unamortized ITCs.
In accordance with regulatory requirements, deferred federal ITCs for the traditional electric operating companies and the natural gas distribution utilities are amortized over the life of the related property with such amortization normally applied as a credit toASU 2016-02
    Table of Contents                                Index to Financial Statements

NOTESMANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS (continued)
Southern Company and Subsidiary Companies 20172018 Annual Report


reduce depreciationthat allows prior determinations of whether existing contracts are, or contain, leases and the classification of existing leases to continue without reassessment. Additionally, Southern Company applied the use-of-hindsight practical expedient in determining lease terms as of the date of adoption and elected the practical expedient that allows existing land easements not previously accounted for as leases not to be reassessed. Southern Company also made accounting policy elections to account for short-term leases in all asset classes as off-balance sheet leases and combined lease and non-lease components in the statementscomputations of income. Credits amortizedlease obligations and right-of-use assets for most asset classes.
The Southern Company system completed the implementation of a new application to track and account for its leases and updated its internal controls and accounting policies to support the accounting for leases under ASU 2016-02. The Southern Company system completed its lease inventory and determined its most significant leases involve PPAs, real estate, and communication towers where certain of Southern Company's subsidiaries are the lessee and PPAs where certain of Southern Company's subsidiaries are the lessor. In the first quarter 2019, the adoption of ASU 2016-02 resulted in this manner amountedrecording lease liabilities and right-of-use assets on Southern Company's balance sheet each totaling approximately $2.0 billion, with no impact on Southern Company's statement of income.
FINANCIAL CONDITION AND LIQUIDITY
Overview
Earnings in all periods presented were negatively affected by charges associated with plants under construction; however, Southern Company's financial condition remained stable at December 31, 2018.
The Southern Company system's cash requirements primarily consist of funding ongoing operations, common stock dividends, capital expenditures, and debt maturities. The Southern Company system's capital expenditures and other investing activities include investments to $22 million in 2017, $22 million in 2016,meet projected long-term demand requirements, including to build new electric generation facilities, to maintain existing electric generation facilities, to comply with environmental regulations including adding environmental modifications to certain existing electric generating units and $21 million in 2015. Southern Power's deferred federal ITCs are amortizedclosures of ash ponds, to income tax expense over the lifeexpand and improve electric transmission and distribution facilities, to update and expand natural gas distribution systems, and for restoration following major storms. Operating cash flows provide a substantial portion of the asset. Credits amortizedSouthern Company system's cash needs. For the three-year period from 2019 through 2021, Southern Company's projected common stock dividends, capital expenditures, and debt maturities are expected to exceed operating cash flows. Southern Company plans to finance future cash needs in this manner amountedexcess of its operating cash flows primarily by accessing borrowings from financial institutions and through debt and equity issuances in the capital markets. Southern Company intends to $57 millioncontinue to monitor its access to short-term and long-term capital markets as well as bank credit arrangements to meet future capital and liquidity needs. See "Sources of Capital," "Financing Activities," and "Capital Requirements and Contractual Obligations" herein for additional information.
Southern Company's investments in 2017, $37 millionthe qualified pension plans and the nuclear decommissioning trust funds decreased in 2016, and $19 million in 2015. Also, Southern Power received cash relatedvalue at December 31, 2018 as compared to federal ITCs underDecember 31, 2017. No contributions to the renewable energy incentives of $162 millionqualified pension plan were made for the year ended December 31, 2015. No2018 and no mandatory contributions to the qualified pension plans are anticipated during 2019. See "Contractual Obligations" herein and Notes 6 and 11 to the financial statements under "Nuclear Decommissioning" and "Pension Plans," respectively, for additional information.
Net cash provided from operating activities in 2018 totaled $6.9 billion, an increase of $0.6 billion from 2017. The increase in net cash provided from operating activities was receivedprimarily due to the timing of vendor payments and increased fuel cost recovery. Net cash provided from operating activities in 2017 totaled $6.4 billion, an increase of $1.5 billion from 2016. Significant changes in operating cash flow for 2017 as compared to 2016 included increases of $1.2 billion related to these incentivesoperating activities of Southern Company Gas, which was acquired on July 1, 2016, and $1.0 billion related to voluntary contributions to the qualified pension plan in 2016, partially offset by the timing of vendor payments.
Net cash used for investing activities in 2018, 2017, and 2016 totaled $5.8 billion, $7.2 billion, and $20.0 billion, respectively. The cash used for investing activities in 2018 was primarily due to the traditional electric operating companies' installation of equipment to comply with environmental standards and construction of electric generation, transmission, and distribution facilities and capital expenditures for Southern Company Gas' infrastructure replacement programs, partially offset by proceeds from the sale transactions described in Note 15 to the financial statements. The cash used for investing activities in 2017 was primarily due to the traditional electric operating companies' installation of equipment to comply with environmental standards and 2016. Furthermore,construction of electric generation, transmission, and distribution facilities, capital expenditures for Southern Company Gas' infrastructure replacement programs, and Southern Power's renewable acquisitions. The cash used for investing activities in 2016 was primarily due to the tax basisclosing of the asset is reduced by 50%Merger, the acquisition of the ITCs received, resulting in a net deferred tax asset. Southern Power has elected to recognize the tax benefit of this basis difference as a reduction to income tax expense in the year in which the plant reaches commercial operation. The tax benefit of the related basis differences reduced income tax expense by $18 million in 2017, $173 million in 2016, and $54 million in 2015. See "Unrecognized Tax Benefits" below for further information.
Tax Credit Carryforwards
At December 31, 2017,PowerSecure, Southern Company had federal ITCGas' investment in SNG, the traditional electric operating companies' construction of electric generation, transmission, and PTC carryforwards (primarily related to Southern Power) which are expected to result in $2.1 billion of federal income tax benefits. The federal ITC carryforwards begin expiring in 2034 but are expected to be fully utilized by 2027. The PTC carryforwards begin expiring in 2032 but are expected to be fully utilized by 2027. The acquisition of additional renewable projects could further delay existing tax credit carryforwards. The ultimate outcome of these matters cannot be determined at this time.
Additionally, Southern Company had state ITC carryforwards for the state of Georgia totaling approximately $318 million, which will expire between 2020distribution facilities and 2027 but are expected to be fully utilized.
Net Operating Loss
After carrying back portions of the federal NOL generated in 2016, Southern Company had a consolidated federal NOL carryforward of approximately $2.3 billion at December 31, 2017. The federal NOL will begin expiring in 2037 but is expected to be fully utilized by 2019. The ultimate outcome of this matter cannot be determined at this time.
At December 31, 2017, the state NOL carryforwards for Southern Company's subsidiaries were as follows:
JurisdictionApproximate NOL CarryforwardsApproximate Net State Income Tax Benefit
Tax Year NOL
Begins Expiring
 (in millions) 
Mississippi$2,890
$114
2032
Oklahoma986
47
2036
Georgia524
23
2019
New York229
13
2036
New York City209
15
2036
Florida304
13
2034
Other states465
24
Various
Total$5,607
$249

    Table of Contents                                Index to Financial Statements

NOTESMANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS (continued)
Southern Company and Subsidiary Companies 20172018 Annual Report


Effective Tax Rateinstallation of equipment at electric generating facilities to comply with environmental standards, and Southern Power's acquisitions and construction of renewable facilities and a natural gas facility.
A reconciliation of the federal statutory income tax rate to the effective income tax rate is as follows:
 2017 2016 2015
Federal statutory rate35.0 % 35.0 % 35.0 %
State income tax, net of federal deduction12.5
 2.1
 1.9
Employee stock plans dividend deduction(4.1) (1.2) (1.2)
Non-deductible book depreciation3.1
 0.9
 1.2
AFUDC-Equity(2.6) (2.0) (2.2)
Non-deductible equity portion on Kemper IGCC write-off15.7
 
 
ITC basis difference(1.7) (5.0) (1.5)
Federal PTCs(12.1) (1.2) 
Amortization of ITC(4.2) (0.9) (0.5)
Tax Reform Legislation(25.6) 
 
Other(2.7) (0.4) 0.2
Effective income tax rate13.3 % 27.3 % 32.9 %
Southern Company's effective tax rate is typically lower than the statutory rateNet cash used for financing activities totaled $1.8 billion in 2018 primarily due to employeenet redemptions and repurchases of long-term debt, common stock plans' dividend deduction, non-taxable AFUDCpayments, and a decrease in commercial paper borrowings, partially offset by net issuances of short-term bank debt, proceeds from Southern Power's sales of non-controlling equity and federal income tax benefits from ITCs and PTCs. However,interests in 2017, the effective tax rate was primarily lower due to the remeasurement of deferred income taxes resulting from the Tax Reform Legislation.
In March 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-09, which changed the accounting for income taxes for share-based payment award transactions. Entities are required to recognize all excess tax benefits and deficiencies related to the exercise or vesting of stock compensation as income tax expense or benefit in the income statement. The adoption of ASU 2016-09 did not have a material impact on Southern Company's overall effective tax rate. See Note 1 under "Recently Issued Accounting Standards" for additional information.
Legal Entity Reorganization
In September 2017, Southern Power began a legal entity reorganization of various direct and indirect subsidiaries that own and operateentities indirectly owning substantially all of its solar facilities including certain subsidiaries ownedand eight of its wind facilities, and the issuance of common stock. Net cash provided from financing activities totaled $1.0 billion in partnership2017 primarily due to net issuances of long-term and short-term debt, partially offset by common stock dividend payments. Net cash provided from financing activities totaled $15.7 billion in 2016 primarily due to issuances of long-term debt and common stock associated with various third parties. The reorganizationcompleting the Merger and funding the subsidiaries' continuous construction programs, Southern Power's acquisitions, and Southern Company Gas' investment in SNG, partially offset by redemptions of long-term debt and common stock dividend payments. Fluctuations in cash flow from financing activities vary from year to year based on capital needs and the maturity or redemption of securities.
Significant balance sheet changes in 2018 included the purchasereclassification of all$5.7 billion and $3.3 billion in total assets and liabilities held for sale, respectively, primarily associated with Gulf Power, as well as decreases of $3.0 billion and $0.4 billion in total assets and liabilities, respectively, associated with the redeemablesales described in Note 15 to the financial statements under "Southern Power" and "Southern Company Gas." Also see Note 15 to the financial statements under "Southern Company's Sale of Gulf Power" and "Assets Held for Sale" for additional information. After adjusting for these changes, other significant balance sheet changes included an increase of $7.1 billion in total property, plant, and equipment primarily related to the $4.7 billion increase in AROs at Alabama Power and Georgia Power, as well as the traditional electric operating companies' installation of equipment to comply with environmental standards and construction of electric generation, transmission, and distribution facilities and Southern Company Gas' capital expenditures for infrastructure replacement programs, partially offset by the second quarter 2018 charge related to the construction of Plant Vogtle Units 3 and 4; a decrease of $3.1 billion in long-term debt (including amounts due within one year) resulting from the repayment of long-term debt; an increase of $3.0 billion in noncontrolling interests representing 10% of the membership interests, inat Southern Turner Renewable Energy, LLC. The reorganization is expected to be substantially completed in the first quarter 2018 and is expected to result in estimated tax benefits totaling between $50 million and $55 million related to certain changes in state apportionment rates and net operating loss carryforward utilization that will be recorded in the first quarter 2018. The ultimate outcome of this matter cannot be determined at this time.
Unrecognized Tax Benefits
Changes during the year in unrecognized tax benefits were as follows:
 2017 2016 2015
 (in millions)
Unrecognized tax benefits at beginning of year$484
 $433
 $170
Tax positions increase from current periods10
 45
 43
Tax positions increase from prior periods10
 21
 240
Tax positions decrease from prior periods(196) (15) (20)
Reductions due to settlements(290) 
 
Balance at end of year$18
 $484
 $433
The tax positions increase from current and prior periods for 2017 and 2016 relate primarily to state tax benefits and charitable contribution carryforwards that were impactedPower as a result of sales of interests in entities indirectly owning substantially all of its solar facilities and eight of its wind facilities; and an increase of $1.9 billion in other regulatory assets, deferred primarily related to AROs at Georgia Power. See Notes 2 and 15 to the settlementfinancial statements under "Georgia PowerNuclear Construction" and "Southern PowerSales of R&E expenditures associated with the Kemper County energy facility,Renewable Facility Interests," respectively, as well as deductionsNotes 6 and 8 to the financial statements and "Financing Activities" herein for R&E expenditures associatedadditional information.
At the end of 2018, the market price of Southern Company's common stock was $43.92 per share (based on the closing price as reported on the NYSE) and the book value was $23.91 per share, representing a market-to-book value ratio of 184%, compared to $48.09, $23.99, and 201%, respectively, at the end of 2017.
Southern Company's consolidated ratio of common equity to total capitalization plus short-term debt was 32.5% and 31.5% at December 31, 2018 and 2017, respectively. See Note 8 to the financial statements for additional information.
Sources of Capital
Southern Company intends to meet its future capital needs through operating cash flows, borrowings from financial institutions, and debt and equity issuances in the capital markets. Equity capital can be provided from any combination of Southern Company's stock plans, private placements, or public offerings. The amount and timing of additional equity and debt issuances in 2019, as well as in subsequent years, will be contingent on Southern Company's investment opportunities and the Southern Company system's capital requirements and will depend upon prevailing market conditions and other factors. See "Capital Requirements and Contractual Obligations" herein for additional information.
Except as described herein, the traditional electric operating companies, Southern Power, and Southern Company Gas plan to obtain the funds required for construction and other purposes from operating cash flows, external security issuances, borrowings from financial institutions, and equity contributions or loans from Southern Company. Southern Power also plans to utilize tax equity partnership contributions, as well as funds resulting from its pending sale of Plant Mankato. However, the amount, type, and timing of any future financings, if needed, will depend upon prevailing market conditions, regulatory approval, and other factors. See Note 15 to the financial statements under "Southern PowerSales of Natural Gas Plants" herein for additional information.
In addition, in 2014, Georgia Power entered into the Loan Guarantee Agreement with the Kemper County energy facility. The tax positions decrease from prior periodsDOE, under which the proceeds of borrowings may be used to reimburse Georgia Power for 2017Eligible Project Costs incurred in connection with its construction of Plant Vogtle Units 3 and 2016,4. Under the Loan Guarantee Agreement, the DOE agreed to guarantee borrowings of up to $3.46 billion (not to exceed 70% of Eligible Project Costs) to be made by Georgia Power under a multi-advance credit facility (FFB Credit Facility) among Georgia Power, the DOE, and the reductions due to settlements for 2017, relate primarily to theFFB. At December 31, 2018, Georgia Power had borrowed $2.6 billion under
    Table of Contents                                Index to Financial Statements

NOTESMANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS (continued)
Southern Company and Subsidiary Companies 20172018 Annual Report


settlement of R&E expenditures associated with the Kemper County energy facility and federal income tax benefits from deferred ITCs. See Note 3 under "Kemper County Energy Facility" and "Section 174 Research and Experimental Deduction" herein for more information.
The impact on Southern Company's effective tax rate, if recognized, is as follows:

2017
2016
2015

(in millions)
Tax positions impacting the effective tax rate$18

$20

$10
Tax positions not impacting the effective tax rate

464

423
Balance of unrecognized tax benefits$18

$484

$433
The tax positions impacting the effective tax rate primarily relate to state tax benefits and charitable contribution carryforwards that were impacted as a result of the settlement of R&E expenditures associated with the Kemper County energy facility and Southern Company's estimate of the uncertainty related to the amount of those benefits. The tax positions not impacting the effective tax rate for 2016 and 2015 relate to deductions for R&E expenditures associated with the Kemper County energy facility. See "Section 174 Research and Experimental Deduction" herein for more information. These amounts are presented on a gross basis without considering the related federal or state income tax impact.
Accrued interest for all tax positions other than the Section 174 R&E deductions was immaterial for all years presented.
Southern Company classifies interest on tax uncertainties as interest expense. Southern Company did not accrue any penalties on uncertain tax positions.
It is reasonably possible that the amount of the unrecognized tax benefits could change within 12 months. The settlement of federal and state audits could impact the balances significantly. At this time, an estimate of the range of reasonably possible outcomes cannot be determined.
The IRS has finalized its audits of Southern Company's consolidated federal income tax returns through 2016. Southern Company is a participant in the Compliance Assurance Process of the IRS. However, the pre-Merger Southern Company Gas 2014, 2015, and June 30, 2016 federal tax returns are currently under audit. The audits for Southern Company's state income tax returns have either been concluded, or the statute of limitations has expired, for years prior to 2011.
Section 174 Research and Experimental Deduction
Southern Company has reflected deductions for R&E expenditures related to the Kemper County energy facility in its federal income tax calculations since 2013 and filed amended federal income tax returns for 2008 through 2013 to also include such deductions. In December 2016, Southern Company and the IRS reached a proposed settlement, which was approved on September 8, 2017 by the U.S. Congress Joint Committee on Taxation, resolving a methodology for these deductions. As a result of this approval, Southern Company recognized $176 million of previously unrecognized tax benefits and reversed $36 million of associated accrued interest.
6. FINANCING
Securities Due Within One Year
A summary of scheduled maturities of securities due within one year at December 31 was as follows:
 2017 2016
 (in millions)
Senior notes$2,354
 $1,995
Other long-term debt1,420
 485
Revenue bonds(*)
90
 76
Capitalized leases31
 32
Unamortized debt issuance expense/discount(3) (1)
Total$3,892
 $2,587
(*)Includes $50 million in revenue bonds classified as short term at December 31, 2017 that were remarketed in an index rate mode subsequent to December 31, 2017. Also includes $40 million in pollution control revenue bonds classified as short term since they are variable rate demand obligations supported by short-term credit facilities; however, the final maturity dates range from 2020 to 2028.

NOTES (continued)
Southern Company and Subsidiary Companies 2017 Annual Report

Maturities through 2022 applicable to total long-term debt are as follows: $3.9 billion in 2018; $3.2 billion in 2019; $3.2 billion in 2020; $3.1 billion in 2021; and $2.2 billion in 2022.
Bank Term Loans
Southern Company and certain of its subsidiaries have entered into various bank term loan agreements. Unless otherwise stated, the proceeds of these loans were used to repay existing indebtedness and for general corporate purposes, including working capital and, for the subsidiaries, their continuous construction programs.
At December 31, 2017, Southern Company, Alabama Power, Georgia Power, Mississippi Power, and Southern Power Company had outstanding bank term loans totaling $450 million, $45 million, $250 million, $900 million, and $420 million, respectively, of which $1.5 billion are reflected in the statements of capitalization as long-term debt and $600 million are reflected in the balance sheet as notes payable. At December 31, 2016, Southern Company, Alabama Power, Gulf Power, Mississippi Power, and Southern Power Company had outstanding bank term loans totaling $400 million, $45 million, $100 million, $1.2 billion, and $380 million, respectively, of which $2.0 billion were reflected in the statements of capitalization as long-term debt and $100 million were reflected in the balance sheet as notes payable.
In June 2017, Southern Company entered into two $100 million aggregate principal amount short-term floating rate bank term loan agreements, which mature on June 21, 2018 and June 29, 2018 and bear interest based on one-month LIBOR.
In August 2017, Southern Company borrowed $250 million pursuant to a short-term uncommitted bank credit arrangement, which bears interest at a rate agreed upon by Southern Company and the bank from time to time and is payable on no less than 30 days' demand by the bank.
In June 2017, Georgia Power entered into two short-term floating rate bank loans in aggregate principal amounts of $50 million and $150 million, with maturity dates of December 1, 2017 and May 31, 2018, respectively, and one long-term floating rate bank loan of $100 million, with a maturity date of June 28, 2018, which was amended in August 2017 to extend the maturity date to October 26, 2018. These loans bear interest based on one-month LIBOR. Also in June 2017, Georgia Power borrowed $500 million pursuant to a short-term uncommitted bank credit arrangement, which bears interest at a rate agreed upon by Georgia Power and the bank from time to time and is payable on no less than 30 days' demand by the bank.
In August 2017, Georgia Power repaid its $50 million floating rate bank loan due December 1, 2017 and $250 million of the $500 million aggregate principal amount outstanding pursuant to its uncommitted bank credit arrangement. In December 2017, Georgia Power repaid the remaining $250 million aggregate principal amount outstanding pursuant to its uncommitted bank credit arrangement.
In March 2017, Gulf Power extended the maturity of its $100 million short-term floating rate bank loan bearing interest based on one-month LIBOR from April 2017 to October 2017 and subsequently repaid the loan in May 2017.
In June 2017, Mississippi Power prepaid $300 million of the outstanding principal amount under its $1.2 billion unsecured term loan, which matures on March 30, 2018.
In September 2017, Southern Power amended its $60 million aggregate principal amount floating rate term loan to, among other things, increase the aggregate principal amount to $100 million and extend the maturity date from September 2017 to October 2018.
The outstanding bank loans as of December 31, 2017 have covenants that limit debt levels to a percentage of total capitalization. The percentage is 70% for Southern Company and 65% for Alabama Power, Georgia Power, Mississippi Power, and Southern Power Company, as defined in the agreements. For purposes of these definitions, debt excludes any long-term debt payable to affiliated trusts and other hybrid securities. Additionally, for Southern Company and Southern Power Company, for purposes of these definitions, debt excludes any project debt incurred by certain subsidiaries of Southern Power Company to the extent such debt is non-recourse to Southern Power Company and capitalization excludes the capital stock or other equity attributable to such subsidiary. At December 31, 2017, each of Southern Company, Alabama Power, Georgia Power, Gulf Power, Mississippi Power, and Southern Power Company was in compliance with its debt limits.
DOE Loan Guarantee Borrowings
Pursuant to the loan guarantee program established under Title XVII of the Energy Policy Act of 2005 (Title XVII Loan Guarantee Program), Georgia Power and the DOE entered into the Loan Guarantee Agreement in 2014, under which the DOE agreed to guarantee the obligations of Georgia Power under a note purchase agreement (FFB Note Purchase Agreement) among the DOE, Georgia Power, and the FFB and a related promissory note (FFB Promissory Note). The FFB Note Purchase Agreement and the FFB Promissory Note provide for a multi-advance term loan facility (FFB Credit Facility), under which Georgia Power may make term loan borrowings through the FFB.

NOTES (continued)
Southern Company and Subsidiary Companies 2017 Annual Report

OnFacility. In July 27, 2017, Georgia Power entered into an amendment to the Loan Guarantee Agreement, (LGA Amendment) in connection with the DOE's consent to Georgia Power's entry into the Vogtle Services Agreement and the related intellectual property licenses (IP Licenses).
Under the terms of the Loan Guarantee Agreement, upon termination of the Vogtle 3 and 4 Agreement,which provides that further advances are conditioned upon the DOE's approval of any agreements entered into in replacement of the Vogtle 3 and 4 Agreement. Under the terms of the LGA Amendment, Georgia Power will not request any advances unless and until certain conditions are satisfied, including (i) receipt of the DOE's approval of the Bechtel Agreement (together with the Vogtle Services Agreement and the IP Licenses, the Replacement EPC Arrangements) and (ii) Georgia Power's entry into a further amendment to the Loan Guarantee Agreement with the DOE to reflect the Replacement EPC Arrangements.satisfaction of certain other conditions.
Proceeds of advances made under the FFB Credit Facility are used to reimburse Georgia Power for Eligible Project Costs. Aggregate borrowings under the FFB Credit Facility may not exceed the lesser of (i) 70% of Eligible Project Costs or (ii) approximately $3.46 billion.
OnIn September 28, 2017, the DOE issued a conditional commitment to Georgia Power for up to approximately $1.67 billion of additional guaranteed loans under the Loan Guarantee Agreement. This conditional commitment expires on June 30, 2018,March 31, 2019, subject to any further extension approved by the DOE. Final approval and issuance of these additional loan guarantees by the DOE cannot be assured and are subject to the negotiation of definitive agreements, completion of due diligence by the DOE, receipt of any necessary regulatory approvals, and satisfaction of other conditions.
All borrowings under the FFB Credit Facility are full recourse to Georgia Power, and Georgia Power is obligated to reimburse the DOE for any payments the DOE is required to make See Note 8 to the FFBfinancial statements under the guarantee. Georgia Power's reimbursement obligations to the "Long-term DebtDOE are full recourse and secured by a first priority lien on (i) Georgia Power's 45.7% undivided ownership interest in Plant Vogtle Units 3 and 4 (primarily the units under construction, the related real property, and any nuclear fuel loaded in the reactor core) and (ii) Georgia Power's rights and obligations under the principal contracts relating to Plant Vogtle Units 3 and 4. There are no restrictions on Georgia Power's ability to grant liens on other property.
In addition to the conditions described above, future advances are subject to satisfaction of customary conditions, as well as certification of compliance with the requirements of the Title XVII Loan Guarantee Program, including accuracy of project-related representations and warranties, delivery of updated project-relatedBorrowings" for additional information and evidence of compliance with the prevailing wage requirements of the Davis-Bacon Act of 1931, as amended, and certification from the DOE's consulting engineer that proceeds of the advances are used to reimburse Eligible Project Costs.
Upon satisfaction of all conditions described above, advances may be requested under the FFB Credit Facility on a quarterly basis through 2020. The final maturity date for each advance under the FFB Credit Facility is February 20, 2044. Interest is payable quarterly and principal payments will begin on February 20, 2020. Borrowings under the FFB Credit Facility will bear interest at the applicable U.S. Treasury rate plus a spread equal to 0.375%.
At both December 31, 2017 and 2016, Georgia Power had $2.6 billion of borrowings outstanding under the FFB Credit Facility.
Underregarding the Loan Guarantee Agreement, Georgia Power is subject to customary borrower affirmative and negativeincluding applicable covenants, and events of default. In addition, Georgia Power is subject to project-related reporting requirements and other project-specific covenants and events of default.
In the event certaindefault, mandatory prepayment events occur, the FFB's commitment to make further advances under the FFB Credit Facility will terminate and Georgia Power will be required to prepay the outstanding principal amount of all borrowings under the FFB Credit Facility over a period of five years (with level principal amortization). Among other things, these mandatory prepayment events include (i) the termination of the Vogtle Services Agreement or rejection of the Vogtle Services Agreement in bankruptcy if Georgia Power does not maintain access to intellectual property rights under the IP Licenses; (ii) a(including any decision by Georgia Power not to continue construction of Plant Vogtle Units 3 and 4; (iii) cancellation of4), and additional conditions to borrowing. Also see Note 2 to the financial statements under "Georgia PowerNuclear Construction" for additional information regarding Plant Vogtle Units 3 and 44.
The issuance of securities by the Georgiatraditional electric operating companies and Nicor Gas is generally subject to the approval of the applicable state PSC or other applicable state regulatory agency. The issuance of all securities by Mississippi Power and short-term securities by Georgia Power ifis generally subject to regulatory approval by the FERC. Additionally, with respect to the public offering of securities, Southern Company and certain of its subsidiaries file registration statements with the SEC under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (1933 Act). The amounts of securities authorized by the Georgia PSC; and (iv) cost disallowances byappropriate regulatory authorities, as well as the Georgia PSC that could have a material adverse effect on completion of Plant Vogtle Units 3 and 4 or Georgia Power's ability to repay the outstanding borrowingssecurities registered under the FFB1933 Act, are continuously monitored and appropriate filings are made to ensure flexibility in the capital markets.
Southern Company, each traditional electric operating company, and Southern Power generally obtain financing separately without credit support from any affiliate. The Southern Company system does not maintain a centralized cash or money pool. Therefore, funds of each company are not commingled with funds of any other company in the Southern Company system.
In addition, Southern Company Gas Capital obtains external financing for Southern Company Gas and its subsidiaries, other than Nicor Gas, which obtains financing separately without credit support from any affiliates. Nicor Gas' commercial paper program supports its working capital needs as Nicor Gas is not permitted to make money pool loans to affiliates. All of the other Southern Company Gas subsidiaries benefit from Southern Company Gas Capital's commercial paper program.
See Note 8 to the financial statements under "Bank Credit Facility. UnderArrangements" for additional information.
At December 31, 2018, Southern Company's current liabilities exceeded current assets by $4.7 billion, primarily due to $3.2 billion of long-term debt that is due within one year (including approximately $1.3 billion at the parent company, $0.2 billion at Alabama Power, $0.6 billion at Georgia Power, $0.6 billion at Southern Power, and $0.4 billion at Southern Company Gas) and $2.9 billion of notes payable (including approximately $1.8 billion at the parent company, $0.3 billion at Georgia Power, $0.1 billion at Southern Power, and $0.7 billion at Southern Company Gas). Subsequent to December 31, 2018, using proceeds from the sale of Gulf Power, the Southern Company parent entity repaid $0.7 billion of its long-term debt due within one year and all $1.8 billion of its notes payable at December 31, 2018. See "Financing Activities" herein for additional information. To meet short-term cash needs and contingencies, the Southern Company system has substantial cash flow from operating activities and access to capital markets and financial institutions. Southern Company, the traditional electric operating companies, Southern Power, and Southern Company Gas intend to utilize operating cash flows, as well as commercial paper, lines of credit, bank notes, and securities issuances, as market conditions permit, as well as, under certain circumstances insurance proceedsfor the traditional electric operating companies, Southern Power, and any proceedsSouthern Company Gas, equity contributions and/or loans from an event of taking must be appliedSouthern Company to immediately prepay outstanding borrowings under the FFB Credit Facility. In addition, if Georgia Power discontinues construction of Plant Vogtle Units 3 and 4, Georgia Power would be obligated to immediately repay a portion of the outstanding borrowings under the FFB Credit Facility to the extent such outstanding borrowings exceed 70% of Eligible Project Costs, net of the proceeds received by Georgia Power under the Guarantee Settlement Agreement. Georgia Power also may voluntarily prepay outstanding borrowings under the FFB Credit Facility. Under the FFB Credit Facility, any prepayment (whether mandatory or optional) will be made with a make-whole premium or discount, as applicable.meet their short-term capital needs.
    Table of Contents                                Index to Financial Statements

NOTESMANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS (continued)
Southern Company and Subsidiary Companies 20172018 Annual Report


In connection with any cancellation of Plant Vogtle Units 3 and 4 that results in a mandatory prepayment event, the DOE may elect to continue construction of Plant Vogtle Units 3 and 4. In such an event, the DOE will have the right to assume Georgia Power's rights and obligations under the principal agreements relating to Plant Vogtle Units 3 and 4 and to acquire all or a portion of Georgia Power's ownership interest in Plant Vogtle Units 3 and 4.
Senior Notes
Southern Company and its subsidiaries issued a total of $4.0 billion of senior notes in 2017. Southern Company issued $0.3 billion and its subsidiaries issued a total of $3.7 billion. The proceeds of Southern Company's issuances were used to repay short-term indebtedness and for other general corporate purposes. Except as described below, the proceeds of Southern Company's subsidiaries' issuances were used to repay long-term indebtedness, to repay short-term indebtedness, and for other general corporate purposes, including the applicable subsidiaries' continuous construction programs. A portion of the proceeds of Gulf Power's senior note issuances was used to redeem all of Gulf Power's outstanding shares of preference stock. See "Redeemable Preferred Stock of Subsidiaries" herein for additional information.
At December 31, 2017 and 2016,2018, Southern Company and its subsidiaries had a total of $35.1 billion and $33.0 billion, respectively, of senior notes outstanding. At December 31, 2017 and 2016, Southern Company had a total of $10.2 billion and $10.3 billion, respectively, of senior notes outstanding. These amounts include senior notes due within one year.
Since Southern Company is a holding company, the right of Southern Company and, hence, the right of creditors of Southern Company (including holders of Southern Company senior notes) to participate in any distribution of the assets of any subsidiary of Southern Company, whether upon liquidation, reorganization or otherwise, is subject to prior claims of creditors and preferred stockholders of such subsidiary.
Junior Subordinated Notes
At December 31, 2017 and 2016, Southern Company and its subsidiaries had a total of $3.6 billion and $2.4 billion, respectively, of junior subordinated notes outstanding.
In June 2017, Southern Company issued $500 million aggregate principal amount of Series 2017A 5.325% Junior Subordinated Notes due June 21, 2057. The proceeds were used to repay short-term indebtedness and for other general corporate purposes.
In November 2017, Southern Company issued $450 million aggregate principal amount of Series 2017B 5.25% Junior Subordinated Notes due December 1, 2077. The proceeds were used to repay short-term indebtedness and for other general corporate purposes.
In September 2017, Georgia Power issued $270 million aggregate principal amount of Series 2017A 5.00% Junior Subordinated Notes due October 1, 2077. The proceeds were used to redeem all outstanding shares of Georgia Power's preferred and preference stock. See "Redeemable Preferred Stock of Subsidiaries" herein for additional information.
Pollution Control Revenue Bonds
Pollution control revenue bond obligations represent loans to the traditional electric operating companies from public authorities of funds derived from sales by such authorities of revenue bonds issued to finance pollution control and solid waste disposal facilities. In some cases, the pollution control revenue bond obligations represent obligations under installment sales agreements with respect to facilities constructed with the proceeds of revenue bonds issued by public authorities. The traditional electric operating companies had $3.3approximately $1.4 billion of outstanding pollution control revenue bond obligations at December 31, 2017cash and 2016, which includes pollution control revenue bonds classified as due within one year. The traditional electric operating companies are required to make payments sufficient for the authorities to meet principal and interest requirements of such bonds. Proceeds from certain issuances are restricted until qualifying expenditures are incurred.
Plant Daniel Revenue Bonds
In 2011, in connection with Mississippi Power's election under its operating lease of Plant Daniel Units 3 and 4 to purchase the assets, Mississippi Power assumed the obligations of the lessor related to $270 million aggregate principal amount of Mississippi Business Finance Corporation Taxable Revenue Bonds, 7.13% Series 1999A due October 20, 2021, issued for the benefit of the lessor. See "Assets Subject to Lien" herein for additional information.
Gas Facility Revenue Bonds
Pivotal Utility Holdings, Inc., a subsidiary of Southern Company Gas (Pivotal Utility Holdings), is party to a series of loan agreements with the New Jersey Economic Development Authority and Brevard County, Florida under which five series of gas facility revenue bonds have been issued with maturities ranging from 2022 to 2033. These revenue bonds are issued by state

NOTES (continued)
Southern Company and Subsidiary Companies 2017 Annual Report

agencies or counties to investors, and proceeds from each issuance then are loaned to Southern Company Gas. The amount of gas facility revenue bonds outstanding at December 31, 2017 and 2016 was $200 million.
The Elizabethtown Gas asset sale agreement requires that bonds representing $180 million of the total that are currently eligible for redemption at par be redeemed on or prior to consummation of the sale. The ultimate outcome of this matter cannot be determined at this time. See Note 12 under "Southern Company Gas – Proposed Sale of Elizabethtown Gas and Elkton Gas" for additional information.
Other Revenue Bonds
Other revenue bond obligations represent loans to Mississippi Power from a public authority of funds derived from the sale by such authority of revenue bonds issued to finance a portion of the costs of constructing the Kemper County energy facility and related facilities.
Mississippi Power had $50 million of such obligations outstanding related to tax-exempt revenue bonds at December 31, 2017 and 2016. Such amounts are reflected in the statements of capitalization as other long-term debt.
First Mortgage Bonds
Nicor Gas, a subsidiary of Southern Company Gas, had $1.0 billion and $625 million of first mortgage bonds outstanding at December 31, 2017 and 2016, respectively. These bonds have been issued with maturities ranging from 2019 to 2057. Substantially all of Nicor Gas' properties are subject to the lien of the indenture securing these first mortgage bonds. See "Assets Subject to Lien" herein for additional information.
On August 10, 2017, Nicor Gas issued $100 million aggregate principal amount of First Mortgage Bonds 3.03% Series due August 10, 2027 and $100 million aggregate principal amount of First Mortgage Bonds 3.62% Series due August 10, 2037. On November 1, 2017, Nicor Gas issued $100 million aggregate principal amount of First Mortgage Bonds 3.85% Series due August 10, 2047 and $100 million aggregate principal amount of First Mortgage Bonds 4.00% Series due August 10, 2057. The proceeds were used to repay short-term indebtedness incurred under the Nicor Gas commercial paper program and for other working capital needs.
Long-Term Debt Payable to an Affiliated Trust
Alabama Power has formed a wholly-owned trust subsidiary for the purpose of issuing preferred securities. The proceeds of the related equity investments and preferred security sales were loaned back to Alabama Power through the issuance of junior subordinated notes totaling $206 million outstanding as of December 31, 2017 and 2016, which constitute substantially all of the assets of this trust and are reflected in the balance sheets as long-term debt payable. Alabama Power considers that the mechanisms and obligations relating to the preferred securities issued for its benefit, taken together, constitute a full and unconditional guarantee by it of the trust's payment obligations with respect to these securities. At December 31, 2017 and 2016, trust preferred securities of $200 million were outstanding.
Capital Leases
Assets acquired under capital leases are recorded in the balance sheets as property, plant, and equipment and the related obligations are classified as long-term debt.
In 2013, Mississippi Power entered into a nitrogen supply agreement for the air separation unit of the Kemper County energy facility, which resulted in a capital lease obligation of $74 million at December 31, 2016. Following the suspension of the Kemper IGCC, Mississippi Power entered into an asset purchase and settlement agreement in December 2017 with the lessor, which terminated the capital lease obligation. See Note 3 under "Kemper County Energy Facility" for additional information.
At December 31, 2017 and 2016, the capitalized lease obligations for Georgia Power's corporate headquarters building were $22 million and $28 million, respectively, with an annual interest rate of 7.9%.
At December 31, 2017 and 2016, a subsidiary of Southern Company had capital lease obligations of approximately $177 million and $29 million, respectively, for an office building and certain computer equipment including desktops, laptops, servers, printers, and storage devices with annual interest rates that range from 1.5% to 4.7%.
Assets Subject to Lien
Each of Southern Company's subsidiaries is organized as a legal entity, separate and apart from Southern Company and its other subsidiaries. There are no agreements or other arrangements among the Southern Company system companies under which the assets of one company have been pledged or otherwise made available to satisfy obligations of Southern Company or any of its other subsidiaries.

NOTES (continued)
Southern Company and Subsidiary Companies 2017 Annual Report

Gulf Power has granted one or more liens on certain of its property in connection with the issuance of certain series of pollution control revenue bonds with an aggregate outstanding principal amount of $41 million as of December 31, 2017.
The revenue bonds assumed in conjunction with Mississippi Power's purchase of Plant Daniel Units 3 and 4 are secured by Plant Daniel Units 3 and 4 and certain related personal property. See "Plant Daniel Revenue Bonds" herein for additional information.
On October 4, 2017, Mississippi Power executed agreements with its largest retail customer, Chevron Products Company (Chevron), to continue providing retail service to the Chevron refinery in Pascagoula, Mississippi through 2038, subject to the approval of the Mississippi PSC. The agreements grant Chevron a security interest in the co-generation assets, with a net book value of approximately $93 million, located at Chevron's refinery that is exercisable upon the occurrence of (i) certain bankruptcy events or (ii) other events of default coupled with specific reductions in steam output at the facility and a downgrade of Mississippi Power's credit rating to below investment grade by two of the three rating agencies.
See "DOE Loan Guarantee Borrowings" above for information regarding certain borrowings of Georgia Power that are secured by a first priority lien on (i) Georgia Power's 45.7% undivided ownership interest in Plant Vogtle Units 3 and 4 (primarily the units under construction, the related real property, and any nuclear fuel loaded in the reactor core) and (ii) Georgia Power's rights and obligations under the principal contracts relating to Plant Vogtle Units 3 and 4.
The first mortgage bonds issued by Nicor Gas are secured by substantially all of Nicor Gas' properties. See "First Mortgage Bonds" herein for additional information.
Under the terms of the PPA and the expansion PPA for Southern Power's Mankato project, which was acquired in 2016, approximately $442 million of assets, primarily related to property, plant, and equipment, are subject to lien at December 31, 2017. See Note 12 under "Southern Power" for additional information.
During 2015, Southern Power indirectly acquired a 51% membership interest in RE Roserock LLC (Roserock), the owner of the Roserock solar facility in Pecos County, Texas. Roserock is in a litigation dispute with McCarthy Building Companies, Inc. (McCarthy) regarding damage to certain solar panels during installation. In connection therewith, Roserock is withholding payments of approximately $26 million from McCarthy, and McCarthy has filed mechanic's liens on the Roserock facility for the same amount. Southern Power intends to vigorously pursue its claims against McCarthy and defend against McCarthy's claims, the ultimate outcome of which cannot be determined at this time.
Bank Credit Arrangements
At December 31, 2017, committedcash equivalents. Committed credit arrangements with banks at December 31, 2018 were as follows:
Expires   Executable Term Loans 
Expires Within
One Year
Expires   Executable Term Loans Expires Within One Year
Company2018 2019 2020 2022 Total Unused 
One
Year
 
Two
Years
 Term Out No Term Out2019
2020
2022 Total 
Unused(d)
 
One
Year
 
Two
Years
 Term Out No Term Out
(in millions)(in millions)
Southern Company(a)
$
 $
 $
 $2,000
 $2,000
 $1,999
 $
 $
 $
 $
$
 $
 $2,000
 $2,000
 $1,999
 $
 $
 $
 $
Alabama Power35
 
 500
 800
 1,335
 1,335
 
 
 
 35
33
 500
 800
 1,333
 1,333
 
 
 
 33
Georgia Power
 
 
 1,750
 1,750
 1,732
 
 
 
 

 
 1,750
 1,750
 1,736
 
 
 
 
Gulf Power30
 25
 225
 
 280
 280
 45
 
 20
 10
Mississippi Power100
 
 
 
 100
 100
 
 
 
 100
100
 
 
 100
 100
 
 
 
 100
Southern Power Company(b)

 
 
 750
 750
 728
 
 
 
 
Southern Power(b)

 
 750
 750
 727
 
 
 
 
Southern Company Gas(c)

 
 
 1,900
 1,900
 1,890
 
 
 
 

 
 1,900
 1,900
 1,895
 
 
 
 
Other30
 
 
 
 30
 30
 20
 
 20
 10
30
 
 
 30
 30
 
 
 
 30
Southern Company Consolidated$195
 $25
 $725
 $7,200
 $8,145
 $8,094
 $65
 $
 $40
 $155
Southern Company Consolidated(e)
$163
 $500
 $7,200
 $7,863
 $7,820
 $
 $
 $
 $163
(a)Represents the Southern Company parent entity.
(b)Does not include Southern Power'sPower Company's $120 million continuing letter of credit facility for standby letters of credit expiring in 2019,2021, of which $19$17 million remainswas unused at December 31, 2017.2018. Southern Power's subsidiaries are not parties to its bank credit arrangement.
(c)Southern Company Gas, as the parent entity, guarantees the obligations of Southern Company Gas Capital, which is the borrower of $1.4 billion of these arrangements.this arrangement. Southern Company Gas' committed credit arrangementsarrangement also includeincludes $500 million for which Nicor Gas is the borrower and which is restricted for working capital needs of Nicor Gas. Pursuant to this multi-year credit arrangement, the allocations between Southern Company Gas Capital and Nicor Gas may be adjusted.
(d)Amounts used are for letters of credit.
(e)
Excludes $280 million of committed credit arrangements of Gulf Power, which was sold on January 1, 2019. See Note 15 to the financial statements under "Southern Company's Sale of Gulf Power" for additional information.
See Note 8 to the financial statements under "Bank Credit Arrangements" for additional information.

NOTES (continued)
Southern Company and Subsidiary Companies 2017 Annual Report

In May 2017, Southern Company,these bank credit arrangements, as well as the term loan arrangements of Alabama Power, Georgia Power and Southern Power Company, each amended certain of their multi-year credit arrangements, which, amongcontain covenants that limit debt levels and contain cross-acceleration or cross-default provisions to other things, extended the maturity dates from 2020 to 2022. Southern Company and Southern Power Company increased their borrowing ability under these arrangements to $2.0 billion from $1.25 billion and to $750 million from $600 million, respectively. Southern Company also terminated its $1.0 billion facility maturing in 2018. Also in May 2017, Southern Company Gas Capital and Nicor Gas terminated their existing credit arrangements for $1.3 billion and $700 million, respectively, which were to mature in 2017 and 2018, and entered into a new multi-year credit arrangement with $1.4 billion and $500 million currently allocated to Southern Company Gas Capital and Nicor Gas, respectively, maturing in 2022. Pursuantindebtedness (including guarantee obligations) that are restricted only to the new multi-year credit arrangement, the allocations between Southern Company Gas Capital and Nicor Gas may be adjusted. In September 2017, Alabama Power also amended its $500 million multi-year credit arrangement, which, among other things, extended the maturity date from 2018 to 2020. In November 2017, Gulf Power amended $195 million of its multi-year credit arrangements to extend the maturity dates from 2017 and 2018 to 2020 and Mississippi Power amended its one-year credit arrangements in an aggregate amount of $100 million to extend the maturity dates from 2017 to 2018.
Mostindebtedness of the bank credit arrangements requireindividual company. Such cross-default provisions to other indebtedness would trigger an event of default if the applicable borrower defaulted on indebtedness or guarantee obligations over a specified threshold. Such cross-acceleration provisions to other indebtedness would trigger an event of default if the applicable borrower defaulted on indebtedness, the payment of commitment fees based on the unused portion of the commitments or the maintenance of compensating balances with the banks. Commitment fees average less than 1/4 of 1% forwhich was then accelerated. At December 31, 2018, Southern Company, the traditional electric operating companies, Southern Power Company, Southern Company Gas, and Nicor Gas. Compensating balances are not legally restricted from withdrawal.Gas were in compliance with all such covenants. None of the bank credit arrangements contain material adverse change clauses at the time of borrowings.
Subject to applicable market conditions, Southern Company and its subsidiaries expect to renew or replace their bank credit arrangements as needed, prior to expiration. In connection therewith, Southern Company and its subsidiaries may extend the maturity dates and/or increase or decrease the lending commitments thereunder.
Southern Company's, Southern Company Gas', and Nicor Gas' credit arrangements contain covenants that limit debt levels to 70% of total capitalization, as defined in the agreements, and most of the other subsidiaries' bank credit arrangements contain covenants that limit debt levels to 65% of total capitalization, as defined in the agreements. For purposes of these definitions, debt excludes the long-term debt payable to affiliated trusts and, in certain arrangements and other hybrid securities. Additionally, for Southern Company and Southern Power Company, for purposes of these definitions, debt excludes any project debt incurred by certain subsidiaries of Southern Power Company to the extent such debt is non-recourse to Southern Power Company and capitalization excludes the capital stock or other equity attributable to such subsidiaries. At December 31, 2017, Southern Company, the traditional electric operating companies, Southern Power Company, Southern Company Gas, and Nicor Gas were each in compliance with their respective debt limit covenants.
A portion of the $8.1 billion unused credit with banks is allocated to provide liquidity support to the revenue bonds of the traditional electric operating companies and the commercial paper programs of Southern Company, the traditional electric operating companies, Southern Power Company, Southern Company Gas, and Nicor Gas. The amount of variable rate revenue bonds of the traditional electric operating companies outstanding requiring liquidity support as of December 31, 2017 was approximately $1.5 billion as compared to $1.9 billion at December 31, 2016.2018 was approximately $1.6 billion, which included $82 million related to Gulf Power. In addition, at December 31, 2017,2018, the traditional electric operating companies had approximately $714$403 million of revenue bonds outstanding that wereare required to be remarketed within the next 12 months.months, which included $58 million related to Gulf Power. See Note 15 to the financial statements under "Southern Company's Sale of Gulf Power" for information regarding the sale of Gulf Power on January 1, 2019. Subsequent to December 31, 2017, $502018, Georgia Power redeemed approximately $108 million of theseobligations related to outstanding variable rate pollution control revenue bonds of Mississippi Power which were in a long-term interest rate mode were remarketed in an index rate mode.bonds.
Southern Company, the traditional electric operating companies (other than Mississippi Power),Alabama Power, Georgia Power, Southern Power Company, Southern Company Gas, and Nicor Gas, and SEGCO make short-term borrowings primarily through commercial paper programs that have the liquidity support of the committed bank credit arrangements described above. Commercial paper and short-term bank term loansShort-term borrowings are included in notes payable in the balance sheets.
    Table of Contents                                Index to Financial Statements

NOTESMANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS (continued)
Southern Company and Subsidiary Companies 20172018 Annual Report


Details of short-term borrowings were as follows:
Short-term Debt at the End of the PeriodShort-term Debt at the End of the Period 
Short-term Debt During the Period (*)
Amount
Outstanding
 
Weighted Average
Interest Rate
Amount Outstanding Weighted Average Interest Rate Average Amount Outstanding Weighted Average Interest Rate Maximum Amount Outstanding
(in millions)  (in millions)   (in millions)   (in millions)
December 31, 2018:         
Commercial paper$1,064
 3.0% $1,655
 2.3% $3,042
Short-term bank debt1,851
 3.1% 1,722
 2.9% 2,504
Total$2,915
 3.1% $3,377
 2.6%  
December 31, 2017:            
Commercial paper$1,832
 1.8%$1,832
 1.8% $2,117
 1.3% $2,946
Short-term bank debt607
 2.3%607
 2.3% 555
 2.1% 1,020
Total$2,439
 1.9%$2,439
 1.9% $2,672
 1.5%  
December 31, 2016:            
Commercial paper$1,909
 1.1%$1,909
 1.1% $976
 0.8% $1,970
Short-term bank debt123
 1.7%123
 1.7% 176
 1.7% 500
Total$2,032
 1.1%$2,032
 1.1% $1,152
 1.1%  
(*)Average and maximum amounts are based upon daily balances during the 12-month periods ended December 31, 2018, 2017, and 2016.
In addition to the short-term borrowings of Southern Power Company included in the table above, at December 31, 2016, Southern Power Company subsidiaries hadassumed credit agreements (Project Credit Facilities) assumed with the acquisition of certain solar facilities, which were non-recourse to Southern Power Company, the proceeds of which were used to finance project costs related to such solar facilities. The Project Credit Facilities were fully repaid in January 20172017. For the year ended December 31, 2016, the Project Credit Facilities had a maximum amount outstanding of $828 million and an average amount outstanding of $566 million at a weighted average interest rate of 2.1% and had total amounts outstanding of $209 million at a weighted average interest rate of 2.1% at December 31, 2016.
Redeemable Preferred Stock of Subsidiaries
At December 31, 2016, each of the traditional electric operating companies had outstanding preferred and/or preference stock. During 2017, Alabama Power and Gulf Power each redeemed all of its outstanding preference stock and Georgia Power redeemed all of its outstanding preferred and preference stock. The preferred stock of Alabama Power and Mississippi Power contains a feature that allows the holders to elect a majority of such subsidiary's board of directors if preferred dividends are not paid for four consecutive quarters. Because such a potential redemption-triggering event is not solely within the control of Alabama Power and Mississippi Power, this preferred stock is presented as "Redeemable Preferred Stock of Subsidiaries" in a manner consistent with temporary equity under applicable accounting standards. The preferred and preference stock at Georgia Power and the preference stock at Alabama Power and Gulf Power did not contain such a provision. As a result, under applicable accounting standards, the preferred and preference stock at Georgia Power and the preference stock at Alabama Power and Gulf Power are presented as "Preferred and Preference Stock of Subsidiaries," a separate component of "Stockholders' Equity," on Southern Company's balance sheets, statements of capitalization, and statements of stockholders' equity.
The following table presents changes during the year in redeemable preferred stock of subsidiaries for Southern Company:
 Redeemable Preferred Stock of Subsidiaries
 (in millions)
Balance at December 31, 2014$375
Issued
Redeemed(262)
Issuance costs5
Balance at December 31, 2015:118
Issued
Redeemed
Balance at December 31, 2016:118
Issued250
Redeemed(38)
Issuance costs(6)
Balance at December 31, 2017:$324

NOTES (continued)
Southern Company and Subsidiary Companies 2017 Annual Report

7. COMMITMENTS
Fuel and Purchased Power Agreements
To supply a portion ofbelieves the fuel requirements of the generating plants, the Southern Company system has entered into various long-term commitmentsneed for the procurement and delivery of fossil and nuclear fuel which are not recognized on the balance sheets. In 2017, 2016, and 2015, the traditional electric operating companies and Southern Power incurred fuel expense of $4.4 billion, $4.4 billion, and $4.8 billion, respectively, the majority of which was purchased under long-term commitments. Southern Company expects that a substantial amount of the Southern Company system's future fuel needs will continue to be purchased under long-term commitments.
In addition, the Southern Company system has entered into various long-term commitments for the purchase of capacity and electricity, some of which are accounted for as operating leases or have been used by a third party to secure financing. Total capacity expense under PPAs accounted for as operating leases was $235 million, $232 million, and $227 million for 2017, 2016, and 2015, respectively.
Estimated total obligations under these commitments at December 31, 2017 were as follows:
 Operating Leases Other
 (in millions)
2018$247
 $7
2019250
 6
2020247
 4
2021249
 5
2022252
 4
2023 and thereafter806
 38
Total$2,051
 $64
Pipeline Charges, Storage Capacity, and Gas Supply
Pipeline charges, storage capacity, and gas supply include charges recoverable through a natural gas cost recovery mechanism, or alternatively, billed to marketers selling retail natural gas, as well as demand charges associated with Southern Company Gas' wholesale gas services. The gas supply balance includes amounts for gas commodity purchase commitments associated with Southern Company Gas' gas marketing services of 35 million mmBtu at floating gas prices calculated using forward natural gas prices at December 31, 2017 and valued at $101 million. Southern Company Gas provides guarantees to certain gas suppliers for certain of its subsidiaries in support of payment obligations.
Expected future contractual obligations for pipeline charges, storage capacity, and gas supply that are not recognized on the balance sheets as of December 31, 2017 were as follows:
 Pipeline Charges, Storage Capacity, and Gas Supply
 (in millions)
2018$813
2019552
2020416
2021375
2022339
2023 and thereafter2,294
Total$4,789
Operating Leases
The Southern Company system has operating lease agreements with various terms and expiration dates. Total rent expense was $176 million, $169 million, and $130 million for 2017, 2016, and 2015, respectively. Southern Company includes any step rents, fixed escalations, and lease concessions in its computation of minimum lease payments.

NOTES (continued)
Southern Company and Subsidiary Companies 2017 Annual Report

As of December 31, 2017, estimated minimum lease payments under operating leases were as follows:
 Minimum Lease Payments
 
Barges &
Railcars
 
Other(*)
 Total
 (in millions)
2018$21
 $128
 $149
201911
 113
 124
20209
 99
 108
20218
 87
 95
20226
 77
 83
2023 and thereafter5
 963
 968
Total$60
 $1,467
 $1,527
(*)Includes operating leases for cellular tower space, facilities, vehicles, and other equipment.
For the traditional electric operating companies, a majority of the barge and railcar lease expenses are recoverable through fuel cost recovery provisions.
In addition to the above rental commitments, Alabama Power and Georgia Power have obligations upon expiration of certain railcar leases with respect to the residual value of the leased property. These leases have terms expiring through 2024 with maximum obligations under these leases of $44 million. At the termination of the leases, the lessee may renew the lease, exercise its purchase option, or the propertyworking capital can be sold to a third party. Alabama Poweradequately met by utilizing commercial paper programs, lines of credit, bank term loans, and Georgia Power expect that the fair market value of the leased property would substantially reduce or eliminate the payments under the residual value obligations.operating cash flows.
Guarantees
In 2013, Georgia Power entered into an agreement that requires Georgia Power to guarantee certain payments of a gas supplier for Plant McIntosh for a period up to 15 years. The guarantee is expected to be terminated if certain events occur within one year of the initial gas deliveries in 2018. In the event the gas supplier defaults on payments, the maximum potential exposure under the guarantee is approximately $43 million.
As discussed above under "Operating Leases," Alabama Power and Georgia Power have entered into certain residual value guarantees.
8. COMMON STOCK
Stock IssuedFinancing Activities
During 2017,2018, Southern Company issued approximately 14.611.6 million shares of common stock primarily through employee equity compensation plans and received proceeds of approximately $659$442 million.
In addition, during the secondthird and thirdfourth quarters of 2017,2018, Southern Company issued a total of approximately 2.712.1 million and 2.5 million shares, respectively, of common stock through at-the-market issuances pursuant to sales agency agreements related to Southern Company's continuous equity offering program and received cash proceeds of approximately $134$540 million and $108 million, respectively, net of $1.1$5 million and $1 million in fees and commissions.
Shares Reserved
At December 31, 2017, a total of 71 million shares were reserved for issuance pursuant to the Southern Investment Plan, employee savings plans, the Outside Directors Stock Plan, the Omnibus Incentive Compensation Plan (which includes stock options and performance share units as discussed below), and an at-the-market program. Of the total 71 million shares reserved, there were 13 million shares of common stock remaining available for awards under the Omnibus Incentive Compensation Plan as of December 31, 2017.
Stock-Based Compensation
Stock-based compensation primarily in the form of performance share units and restricted stock units may be granted through the Omnibus Incentive Compensation Plan to a large segment of Southern Company system employees ranging from line management to executives. In 2015 and 2016, stock-based compensation consisted exclusively of performance share units. Beginning in 2017, stock-based compensation granted to employees includes restricted stock units in addition to performancecommissions, respectively.
    Table of Contents                                Index to Financial Statements

NOTESMANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS (continued)
Southern Company and Subsidiary Companies 20172018 Annual Report


share units. Prior to 2015, stock-based compensation also included stock options. As of December 31, 2017, there were 5,112 current and former employees participating inThe following table outlines the stock option, performance share unit, and restricted stock unit programs.
In conjunction with the Merger, stock-based compensation in the form of Southern Company restricted stock and performance share units was also granted to certain executives of Southern Company Gas through the Southern Company Omnibus Incentive Compensation Plan.
Performance Share Units
Performance share units granted to employees vest at the end of a three-year performance period. All unvested performance share units vest immediately upon a change in control where Southern Company is not the surviving corporation. Shares of Southern Company common stock are delivered to employees at the end of the performance period with the number of shares issued ranging from 0% to 200% of the target number of performance share units granted, based on achievement of the performance goals established by the Compensation Committee of the Southern Company Board of Directors.
Southern Company issues performance share units with performance goals based on three performance goals to employees. These include performance share units with performance goals based on the total shareholder return (TSR)long-term debt financing activities for Southern Company common stock during the three-year performance period as compared to a group of industry peers, performance share units with performance goals based on Southern Company's cumulative earnings per share (EPS) over the performance period, and performance share units with performance goals based on Southern Company's equity-weighted ROE over the performance period.
In 2015 and 2016, the EPS-based and ROE-based awards each represented 25% of the total target grant date fair value of the performance share unit awards granted. The remaining 50% of the total target grant date fair value consisted of TSR-based awards. Beginning in 2017, the total target grant date fair value of the stock compensation awards granted was comprised 20% each of EPS-based awards and ROE-based awards and 30% each of TSR-based awards and restricted stock units.
The fair value of TSR-based performance share unit awards is determined as of the grant date using a Monte Carlo simulation model to estimate the TSR of Southern Company's common stock among the industry peers over the performance period. Southern Company recognizes compensation expense on a straight-line basis over the three-year performance period without remeasurement.
The fair values of the EPS-based awards and the ROE-based awards are based on the closing stock price of Southern Company common stock on the date of the grant. Compensation expenseits subsidiaries for the EPS-based and ROE-based awards is generally recognized ratably over the three-year performance period initially assuming a 100% payout at the end of the performance period. Employees become immediately vested in the TSR-based performance share units, along with the EPS-based and ROE-based awards, upon retirement. As a result, compensation expense for employees that are retirement eligible at the grant date is recognized immediately while compensation expense for employees that become retirement eligible during the vesting period is recognized over the period from grant date to the date of retirement eligibility. The expected payout related to the EPS-based and ROE-based awards is reevaluated annually with expense recognized to date increased or decreased based on the number of shares currently expected to be issued. Unlike the TSR-based awards, the compensation expense ultimately recognized for the EPS-based awards and the ROE-based awards will be based on the actual number of shares issued at the end of the performance period.
In determining the fair value of the TSR-based awards issued to employees, the expected volatility is based on the historical volatility of Southern Company's stock over a period equal to the performance period. The risk-free rate is based on the U.S. Treasury yield curve in effect at the time of grant that covers the performance period of the awards. The following table shows the assumptions used in the pricing model and the weighted average grant-date fair value of performance share award units granted:year ended December 31, 2018:
Year Ended December 312017 2016 2015
Expected volatility15.6% 15.0% 12.9%
Expected term (in years)
3 3 3
Interest rate1.4% 0.8% 1.0%
Weighted average grant-date fair value$49.08 $45.06 $46.38
Company
Senior
Note
Issuances
 
Senior Note
Maturities, Redemptions, and Repurchases
 
Revenue
Bond
Issuances and
Reofferings
of Purchased
Bonds
 
Revenue
Bond
Maturities, Redemptions,
 and Repurchases
 
Other
Long-Term
Debt
Issuances
 
Other
Long-Term
Debt
Redemptions
and
Maturities(a)
 (in millions)
Southern Company(b)
$750
 $1,000
 $
 $
 $
 $
Alabama Power500
 
 120
 120
 
 1
Georgia Power
 1,500
 108
 469
 
 111
Mississippi Power600
 155
 
 43
 
 900
Southern Power
 350
 
 
 
 420
Southern Company Gas
 155
 
 200
 300
 
Other(c)

 100
 
 
 100
 13
Elimination(d)

 
 
 
 
 (4)
Southern Company Consolidated$1,850
 $3,260
 $228
 $832
 $400
 $1,441
(a)Includes reductions in capital lease obligations resulting from cash payments under capital leases.
(b)Represents the Southern Company parent entity.
(c)
In November 2018, SEGCO, as borrower, and Alabama Power, as guarantor, entered into a $100 million long-term delayed draw floating rate bank term loan bearing interest based on three-month LIBOR, which SEGCO used to repay at maturity $100 million aggregate principal amount of Series 2013A Senior Notes due December 1, 2018. See Note 9 to the financial statements under "Guarantees" for additional information.
(d)Represents reductions in affiliate capital lease obligations at Georgia Power, which are eliminated in Southern Company's consolidated financial statements.
Except as otherwise described herein, Southern Company and its subsidiaries used the proceeds of debt issuances for their redemptions and maturities shown in the table above, to repay short-term indebtedness, and for general corporate purposes, including working capital. The subsidiaries also used the proceeds for their construction programs.
The weighted average grant-date fair value of both EPS-basedIn March 2018, Southern Company entered into a $900 million short-term floating rate bank loan bearing interest based on one-month LIBOR, which was repaid in August 2018.
In April 2018, Southern Company borrowed $250 million pursuant to a short-term uncommitted bank credit arrangement, bearing interest at a rate agreed upon by Southern Company and ROE-based performance share units granted during 2017, 2016,the bank from time to time and 2015 was $49.21, $48.87, and $47.75, respectively.
Total unvested performance share units outstanding as ofpayable on no less than 30 days' demand by the bank. Subsequent to December 31, 2016 were 3.2 million. During2018, Southern Company repaid this loan.
In June 2018, Southern Company repaid at maturity two $100 million short-term floating rate bank term loans.
In August 2018, Southern Company issued $750 million aggregate principal amount of Series 2018A Floating Rate Senior Notes due February 14, 2020 bearing interest based on three-month LIBOR, entered into a $1.5 billion short-term floating rate bank loan bearing interest based on one-month LIBOR, and repaid $250 million borrowed in August 2017 1.2pursuant to a short-term uncommitted bank credit arrangement. Subsequent to December 31, 2018, Southern Company repaid the $1.5 billion short-term floating rate bank loan.
In the third quarter 2018, Southern Company repaid at maturity $500 million performance share units were grantedaggregate principal amount of 1.55% Senior Notes and 1.5$500 million performance share units were vested or forfeited, resulting in 2.9aggregate principal amount of Series 2013A 2.45% Senior Notes.
Subsequent to December 31, 2018, through cash tender offers, Southern Company repurchased and retired approximately $522 million of the $1.0 billion aggregate principal amount outstanding of its 1.85% Senior Notes due July 1, 2019 (1.85% Notes), approximately $180 million of the $350 million aggregate principal amount outstanding of its Series 2014B 2.15% Senior Notes due September 1, 2019 (Series 2014B Notes), and approximately $504 million of the $750 million aggregate principal amount outstanding of its Series 2018A Floating Rate Notes due February 14, 2020 (Series 2018A Notes), for an aggregate purchase price, excluding accrued and unpaid interest, of approximately $1.2 billion. In addition, subsequent to December 31, 2018, and following the completion of the cash tender offers, Southern Company completed the redemption of all of the Series 2018A Notes remaining outstanding and called for redemption all of the 1.85% Notes and Series 2014B Notes remaining outstanding.
    Table of Contents                                Index to Financial Statements

NOTESMANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS (continued)
Southern Company and Subsidiary Companies 20172018 Annual Report


unvested performance share units outstanding atSubsequent to December 31, 2017.2018, Alabama Power repaid at maturity $200 million aggregate principal amount of Series Z 5.125% Senior Notes.
In January 2018, Georgia Power repaid its outstanding $150 million short-term floating rate bank loan due May 31, 2018.
In May 2018, through cash tender offers, Georgia Power repurchased and retired $89 million of the $250 million aggregate principal amount outstanding of its Series 2007A 5.65% Senior Notes due March 1, 2037, $326 million of the $500 million aggregate principal amount outstanding of its Series 2009A 5.95% Senior Notes due February 1, 2039, and $335 million of the $600 million aggregate principal amount outstanding of its Series 2010B 5.40% Senior Notes due June 1, 2040, for an aggregate purchase price, excluding accrued and unpaid interest, of $902 million.
Subsequent to December 31, 2018, Georgia Power redeemed approximately $13 million, $20 million, and $75 million aggregate principal amount of Development Authority of Burke County (Georgia) Pollution Control Revenue Bonds (Georgia Power Company Plant Vogtle Project), First Series 1992, Eighth Series 1994, and Second Series 1995, respectively.
In March 2018, Mississippi Power entered into a $300 million short-term floating rate bank loan bearing interest based on one-month LIBOR, of which $200 million was repaid in the second quarter 2018 and $100 million was repaid in the third quarter 2018. The numberproceeds of this loan, together with the proceeds of Mississippi Power's $600 million senior notes issuances, were used to repay Mississippi Power's $900 million unsecured floating rate term loan.
In October 2018, Mississippi Power completed the redemption of all 334,210 outstanding shares of its preferred stock (as well as related depositary shares), with an aggregate par value of approximately $33.4 million.
In May 2018, Southern Power entered into two short-term floating rate bank loans, each for an aggregate principal amount of $100 million, which bear interest based on one-month LIBOR. In November 2018, Southern Power repaid one of these short-term loans.
During 2018, Southern Power received approximately $148 million of third-party tax equity related to certain of its renewable facilities. See Note 15 to the financial statements under "Southern Power" for additional information.
Prior to its sale, in the second quarter 2018, Pivotal Utility Holdings caused $200 million aggregate principal amount of gas facility revenue bonds to be redeemed.
In May 2018, Southern Company Gas Capital borrowed $95 million pursuant to a short-term uncommitted bank credit arrangement, guaranteed by Southern Company Gas, bearing interest at a rate agreed upon by Southern Company Gas Capital and the bank from time to time and payable on no less than 30 days' demand by the bank. In July 2018, Southern Company Gas Capital repaid this loan.
Other long-term debt issuances for Southern Company Gas include the issuance by Nicor Gas of $300 million aggregate principal amount of first mortgage bonds in a private placement, of which $100 million was issued for the three-year performancein August 2018 and vesting period ended$200 million was issued in November 2018.
In addition to any financings that may be necessary to meet capital requirements and contractual obligations, Southern Company and its subsidiaries plan to continue, when economically feasible, a program to retire higher-cost securities and replace these obligations with lower-cost capital if market conditions permit.
Credit Rating Risk
At December 31, 2017 will be determined2018, Southern Company and its subsidiaries did not have any credit arrangements that would require material changes in payment schedules or terminations as a result of a credit rating downgrade.
There are certain contracts that could require collateral, but not accelerated payment, in the first quarter 2018.
For the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016, and 2015, total compensation cost for performance share units recognized in income was $74 million, $96 million, and $88 million, respectively, with the related tax benefit also recognized in incomeevent of $29 million, $37 million, and $34 million, respectively. As of December 31, 2017, $30 million of total unrecognized compensation cost related to performance share award units will be recognized over a weighted-average period of approximately 21 months.
Restricted Stock Units
Beginning in 2017, stock-based compensation granted to employees included restricted stock units in addition to performance share units. One-third of the restricted stock units granted to employees vest each year throughout a three-year service period. All unvested restricted stock units vest immediately upon a change in control where Southern Company is not the surviving corporation. Shares of Southern Company common stock are delivered to employees at the end of the vesting period.
The fair value of restricted stock units is based on the closing stock price of Southern Company common stock on the date of the grant. Since one-third of the restricted stock units vest each year throughout a three-year service period, compensation expense for restricted stock unit awards is generally recognized over the corresponding one-, two-, or three-year period. Employees become immediately vested in the restricted stock units upon retirement. As a result, compensation expense for employees that are retirement eligible at the grant date is recognized immediately while compensation expense for employees that become retirement eligible during the vesting period is recognized over the period from grant date to the date of retirement eligibility.
The weighted average grant-date fair value of restricted stock units granted during 2017 was $49.25.
During 2017, 0.6 million restricted stock units were granted and 0.1 million restricted stock units were vested or forfeited, resulting in 0.7 million unvested restricted stock units outstanding at December 31, 2017, including previously issued restricted stock units related to other employee retention agreements.
For the year ended December 31, 2017, total compensation cost for restricted stock units recognized in income was $25 million with the related tax benefit also recognized in income of $10 million. As of December 31, 2017, $8 million of total unrecognized compensation cost related to restricted stock units will be recognized over a weighted-average period of approximately 13 months.
Stock Options
In 2015, Southern Company discontinued the granting of stock options and all outstanding options have vested. Stock options expire no later than 10 years after the grant date and the latest possible exercise will occur no later than November 2024.
Southern Company's activity in the stock option program for 2017 is summarized below:
 Shares Subject to Option Weighted Average Exercise Price
 (in millions)  
Outstanding at December 31, 201624.6
 $41.28
Exercised6.0
 40.03
Cancelled
 39.90
Outstanding and Exercisable at December 31, 201718.6
 $41.68
As of December 31, 2017, the weighted average remaining contractual term for the options outstanding and options exercisable was approximately five years and the aggregate intrinsic value for the options outstanding and options exercisable was $119 million.
Total compensation cost for stock option awards and the related tax benefits recognized in income were immaterial for all years presented.
The total intrinsic value of options exercised during the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016, and 2015 was $64 million, $120 million, and $48 million, respectively. The actual tax benefit for the tax deductions from stock option exercises totaled $25 million, $46 million, and $19 million for the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016, and 2015, respectively. Prior to the adoption of ASU 2016-09, the excess tax benefits related to the exercise of stock options were recognized in Southern Company's financial statements with a credit rating change of certain subsidiaries to equity. Upon the adoptionBBB and/or Baa2 or below. These contracts are for physical electricity and natural gas purchases and sales, fuel purchases, fuel transportation and storage, energy price risk management, transmission, interest rate management, and construction of ASU 2016-09, beginning in 2016, all tax benefits related to the exercise of stock options are recognized in income.new generation at Plant Vogtle Units 3 and 4.
    Table of Contents                                Index to Financial Statements

NOTESMANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS (continued)
Southern Company and Subsidiary Companies 20172018 Annual Report


Southern Company has a policy of issuing shares to satisfy share option exercises. Cash received from issuances related to option exercisesThe maximum potential collateral requirements under the share-based payment arrangements for the years endedthese contracts at December 31, 2017, 2016, and 2015 was $239 million, $448 million, and $154 million, respectively.
Southern Company Gas Restricted Stock Awards
At the effective time of the Merger, each outstanding award of existing Southern Company Gas performance share units was converted into an award of Southern Company's restricted stock units. Under the terms of the restricted stock awards, the employees received Southern Company stock when they satisfy the requisite service period by being continuously employed through the original three-year vesting schedule of the award being replaced. Southern Company issued 0.7 million restricted stock units with a grant-date fair value of $53.83, based on the closing stock price of Southern Company common stock on the date of the grant. As a portion of the fair value of the award related to pre-combination service, the grant date fair value was allocated to pre- or post-combination service and accounted for as Merger consideration or compensation cost, respectively. Approximately $13 million of the grant date fair value was allocated to Merger consideration.
For the years ended December 31, 2017 and 2016, total compensation cost for restricted stock units recognized in income was $8 million and $13 million, respectively, and the related tax benefit also recognized in income was $4 million for each year. As of December 31, 2017, $3 million of total unrecognized compensation cost related to restricted stock units will be recognized over a weighted-average period of approximately 12 months.
Southern Company Gas Change in Control Awards
Southern Company awarded performance share units to certain Southern Company Gas employees who continued their employment with the Southern Company in lieu of certain change in control benefits the employee was entitled to receive following the Merger (change in control awards). Shares of Southern Company common stock and/or cash equal to the dollar value of the change in control benefit will vest and be issued one-third each year as long as the employee remains in service with Southern Company or its subsidiaries at each vest date. In addition to the change in control benefit, Southern Company common stock could be issued to the employees at the end of a performance period based on achievement of certain Southern Company common stock price metrics, as well performance goals established by the Compensation Committee of the Southern Company Board of Directors (achievement shares).
The change in control benefits are accounted for as a liability award with the fair value equal to the guaranteed dollar value of the change in control benefit. The grant-date fair value of the achievement portion of the award was determined using a Monte Carlo simulation model to estimate the number of achievement shares expected to vest based on the Southern Company common stock price. The expected payout is reevaluated annually with expense recognized to date increased or decreased proportionately based on the expected performance. The compensation expense ultimately recognized for the achievement shares will be based on the actual performance.
For the years ended December 31, 2017 and 2016, total compensation cost for the change in control awards recognized in income was $12 million and $4 million, respectively. The related tax benefit also recognized in income was $6 million for the year ended December 31, 2017 and an immaterial amount for the year ended December 31, 2016. As of December 31, 2017, approximately $8 million of total unrecognized compensation cost related to change in control awards will be recognized over a weighted-average period of approximately 18 months.
Diluted Earnings Per Share
For Southern Company, the only difference in computing basic and diluted EPS is attributable to awards outstanding under the stock option and performance share plans. The effect of both stock options and performance share award units was determined using the treasury stock method. Shares used to compute diluted EPS2018 were as follows:
 Average Common Stock Shares
 2017 2016 2015
 (in millions)
As reported shares1,000
 951
 910
Effect of options and performance share award units8
 7
 4
Diluted shares1,008
 958
 914
Prior to the adoption of ASU 2016-09 in 2016, the effect of options and performance share award units included the assumed impacts of any excess tax benefits from the exercise of all "in the money" outstanding share based awards. Stock options and

NOTES (continued)
Southern Company and Subsidiary Companies 2017 Annual Report

performance share award units that were not included in the diluted EPS calculation because they were anti-dilutive were immaterial in all years presented.
Common Stock Dividend Restrictions
The income of Southern Company is derived primarily from equity in earnings of its subsidiaries. At December 31, 2017, consolidated retained earnings included $5.3 billion of undistributed retained earnings of the subsidiaries.
9. NUCLEAR INSURANCE
Under the Price-Anderson Amendments Act (Act), Alabama Power and Georgia Power maintain agreements of indemnity with the NRC that, together with private insurance, cover third-party liability arising from any nuclear incident occurring at the companies' nuclear power plants. The Act provides funds up to $13.4 billion for public liability claims that could arise from a single nuclear incident. Each nuclear plant is insured against this liability to a maximum of $450 million by American Nuclear Insurers (ANI), with the remaining coverage provided by a mandatory program of deferred premiums that could be assessed, after a nuclear incident, against all owners of commercial nuclear reactors. A company could be assessed up to $127 million per incident for each licensed reactor it operates but not more than an aggregate of $19 million per incident to be paid in a calendar year for each reactor. Such maximum assessment, excluding any applicable state premium taxes, for Alabama Power and Georgia Power, based on its ownership and buyback interests in all licensed reactors, is $255 million and $247 million, respectively, per incident, but not more than an aggregate of $38 million and $37 million, respectively, per company to be paid for each incident in any one year. Both the maximum assessment per reactor and the maximum yearly assessment are adjusted for inflation at least every five years. The next scheduled adjustment is due no later than September 10, 2018. See Note 4 for additional information on joint ownership agreements.
Alabama Power and Georgia Power are members of Nuclear Electric Insurance Limited (NEIL), a mutual insurer established to provide property damage insurance in an amount up to $1.5 billion for members' operating nuclear generating facilities. Additionally, both companies have NEIL policies that currently provide decontamination, excess property insurance, and premature decommissioning coverage up to $1.25 billion for nuclear losses and policies providing coverage up to $750 million for non-nuclear losses in excess of the $1.5 billion primary coverage.
NEIL also covers the additional costs that would be incurred in obtaining replacement power during a prolonged accidental outage at a member's nuclear plant. Members can purchase this coverage, subject to a deductible waiting period of up to 26 weeks, with a maximum per occurrence per unit limit of $490 million. After the deductible period, weekly indemnity payments would be received until either the unit is operational or until the limit is exhausted. Alabama Power and Georgia Power each purchase limits based on the projected full cost of replacement power, subject to ownership limitations. Each facility has elected a 12-week deductible waiting period.
A builders' risk property insurance policy has been purchased from NEIL for the construction of Plant Vogtle Units 3 and 4. This policy provides the Vogtle Owners up to $2.75 billion for accidental property damage occurring during construction.
Under each of the NEIL policies, members are subject to assessments each year if losses exceed the accumulated funds available to the insurer. The maximum annual assessments for Alabama Power and Georgia Power as of December 31, 2017 under the NEIL policies would be $55 million and $81 million, respectively.
Claims resulting from terrorist acts are covered under both the ANI and NEIL policies (subject to normal policy limits). The aggregate, however, that NEIL will pay for all claims resulting from terrorist acts in any 12-month period is $3.2 billion plus such additional amounts NEIL can recover through reinsurance, indemnity, or other sources.
For all on-site property damage insurance policies for commercial nuclear power plants, the NRC requires that the proceeds of such policies shall be dedicated first for the sole purpose of placing the reactor in a safe and stable condition after an accident. Any remaining proceeds are to be applied next toward the costs of decontamination and debris removal operations ordered by the NRC, and any further remaining proceeds are to be paid either to the applicable company or to its debt trustees as may be appropriate under the policies and applicable trust indentures. In the event of a loss, the amount of insurance available might not be adequate to cover property damage and other expenses incurred. Uninsured losses and other expenses, to the extent not recovered from customers, would be borne by Alabama Power or Georgia Power, as applicable, and could have a material effect on Southern Company's financial condition and results of operations.
All retrospective assessments, whether generated for liability, property, or replacement power, may be subject to applicable state premium taxes.

NOTES (continued)
Southern Company and Subsidiary Companies 2017 Annual Report

10. FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTS
Fair value measurements are based on inputs of observable and unobservable market data that a market participant would use in pricing the asset or liability. The use of observable inputs is maximized where available and the use of unobservable inputs is minimized for fair value measurement and reflects a three-tier fair value hierarchy that prioritizes inputs to valuation techniques used for fair value measurement.
Level 1 consists of observable market data in an active market for identical assets or liabilities.
Level 2 consists of observable market data, other than that included in Level 1, that is either directly or indirectly observable.
Level 3 consists of unobservable market data. The input may reflect the assumptions of the Company of what a market participant would use in pricing an asset or liability. If there is little available market data, then the Company's own assumptions are the best available information.
In the case of multiple inputs being used in a fair value measurement, the lowest level input that is significant to the fair value measurement represents the level in the fair value hierarchy in which the fair value measurement is reported.

NOTES (continued)
Southern Company and Subsidiary Companies 2017 Annual Report

As of December 31, 2017, assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis during the period, together with their associated level of the fair value hierarchy, were as follows:
 Fair Value Measurements Using  
 Quoted Prices in Active Markets for Identical Assets  Significant Other Observable Inputs Significant Unobservable Inputs Net Asset Value as a Practical Expedient  
As of December 31, 2017:(Level 1) (Level 2) (Level 3) (NAV) Total
 (in millions)
Assets:         
Energy-related derivatives(a)(b)
$331
 $239
 $
 $
 $570
Interest rate derivatives
 1
 
 
 1
Foreign currency derivatives
 129
 
 
 129
Nuclear decommissioning trusts:(c)
         
Domestic equity690
 82
 
 
 772
Foreign equity62
 224
 
 
 286
U.S. Treasury and government agency securities
 251
 
 
 251
Municipal bonds
 68
 
 
 68
Corporate bonds21
 315
 
 
 336
Mortgage and asset backed securities
 57
 
 
 57
Private equity
 
 
 29
 29
Other19
 12
 
 
 31
Cash equivalents1,455
 
 
 
 1,455
Other investments9
 
 1
 
 10
Total$2,587
 $1,378
 $1
 $29
 $3,995
Liabilities:         
Energy-related derivatives(a)(b)
$480
 $253
 $
 $
 $733
Interest rate derivatives
 38
 
 
 38
Foreign currency derivatives
 23
 
 
 23
Contingent consideration
 
 22
 
 22
Total$480
 $314
 $22
 $
 $816
Credit Ratings
Maximum
Potential
Collateral
Requirements(a)
 (in millions)
At BBB and/or Baa2$30
At BBB- and/or Baa3$542
At BB+ and/or Ba1(b)
$2,176
(a)Energy-related derivatives exclude $11
Includes potential collateral requirements related to Gulf Power of $111 million associated with premiums and certain weather derivatives accounted$221 million at a credit rating of BBB- and/or Baa3 and BB+ and/or Ba1, respectively. See Note 15 to the financial statements under "Southern Company's Sale of Gulf Power" for basedinformation regarding the sale of Gulf Power on intrinsic value rather than fair value.January 1, 2019.
(b)Energy-related derivatives exclude cashAny additional credit rating downgrades at or below BB- and/or Ba3 could increase collateral of $193requirements up to an additional $38 million.
(c)
Includes the investment securities pledged to creditors and collateral received, and excludes receivables related to investment income, pending investment sales, currencies, and payables related to pending investment purchases and the securities lending program. See Note 1 under "Nuclear Decommissioning" for additional information.

NOTES (continued)
credit, or cash. Additionally, a credit rating downgrade could impact the ability of Southern Company and Subsidiary Companies 2017 Annual Report
its subsidiaries to access capital markets and would be likely to impact the cost at which they do so.

On February 26, 2018, Moody's revised its rating outlook for Mississippi Power from stable to positive. On August 8, 2018, Moody's upgraded Mississippi Power's senior unsecured rating to Baa3 from Ba1 and maintained the positive rating outlook.
AsOn February 28, 2018, Fitch removed Mississippi Power from rating watch negative and revised its rating outlook from stable to positive.
Also on February 28, 2018, Fitch downgraded the senior unsecured long-term debt rating of December 31, 2016, assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis during the period, together with their associated level of the fair value hierarchy, were as follows:
 Fair Value Measurements Using  
 Quoted Prices in Active Markets for Identical Assets Significant Other Observable Inputs Significant Unobservable Inputs Net Asset Value as a Practical Expedient  
As of December 31, 2016:(Level 1) (Level 2) (Level 3) (NAV) Total
 (in millions)
Assets:         
Energy-related derivatives(a)(b)
$338
 $333
 $
 $
 $671
Interest rate derivatives
 14
 
 
 14
Nuclear decommissioning trusts:(c)
         
Domestic equity589
 73
 
 
 662
Foreign equity48
 168
 
 
 216
U.S. Treasury and government agency securities
 92
 
 
 92
Municipal bonds
 73
 
 
 73
Corporate bonds22
 310
 
 
 332
Mortgage and asset backed securities
 183
 
 
 183
Private equity
 
 
 20
 20
Other11
 15
 
 
 26
Cash equivalents1,172
 
 
 
 1,172
Other investments9
 
 1
 
 10
Total$2,189
 $1,261
 $1
 $20
 $3,471
Liabilities:         
Energy-related derivatives(a)(b)
$345
 $285
 $
 $
 $630
Interest rate derivatives
 29
 
 
 29
Foreign currency derivatives
 58
 
 
 58
Contingent consideration
 
 18
 
 18
Total$345
 $372
 $18
 $
 $735
(a)Energy-related derivatives exclude $4 million associated with certain weather derivatives accounted for based on intrinsic value rather than fair value.
(b)Energy-related derivatives exclude cash collateral of $62 million.
(c)
Includes the investment securities pledged to creditors and collateral received, and excludes receivables related to investment income, pending investment sales, currencies, and payables related to pending investment purchases and the securities lending program. See Note 1 under "Nuclear Decommissioning" for additional information.
Valuation Methodologies
The energy-related derivatives primarily consist of exchange-traded and over-the-counter financial products for natural gas and physical power products, including, from time to time, basis swaps. These are standard products used within the energy industry and are valued using the market approach. The inputs used are mainly from observable market sources, such as forward natural gas prices, power prices, implied volatility, and overnight index swap interest rates. Interest rate derivatives are also standard over-the-counter products that are valued using observable market data and assumptions commonly used by market participants. The fair value of interest rate derivatives reflects the net present value of expected payments and receipts under the swap agreement based on the market's expectation of future interest rates. Additional inputs to the net present value calculation may include the contract terms, counterparty credit risk, and occasionally, implied volatility of interest rate options. The fair value of cross-currency swaps reflects the net present value of expected payments and receipts under the swap agreement based on the market's expectation of future foreign currency exchange rates. Additional inputs to the net present value calculation may include the contract terms, counterparty credit risk, and discount rates. The interest rate derivatives and cross-currency swaps are

NOTES (continued)
Southern Company to BBB+ from A- with a stable outlook and Subsidiary Companies 2017 Annual Report
of Georgia Power to A from A+ with a negative outlook. On August 9, 2018, Fitch downgraded the senior unsecured long-term debt rating of Georgia Power to A- from A.

On March 14, 2018, S&P upgraded the senior unsecured long-term debt rating of Mississippi Power to A- from BBB+. The outlook remained negative.
categorized as Level 2 under Fair Value Measurements as these inputs are based on observable data and valuationsOn August 8, 2018, Moody's downgraded the senior unsecured debt rating of similar instruments. See Note 11Georgia Power to Baa1 from A3.
On September 28, 2018, Moody's revised its rating outlooks for additional information on how these derivatives are used.
The NRC requires licensees of commissioned nuclear power reactors to establish a plan for providing reasonable assurance of funds for future decommissioning. For fair value measurements of the investments within the nuclear decommissioning trusts, external pricing vendors are designated for each asset class with each security specifically assigned a primary pricing source. For investments held within commingled funds, fair value is determined at the end of each business day through the net asset value, which is established by obtaining the underlying securities' individual prices from the primary pricing source. A market price secured from the primary source vendor is then evaluated by management in its valuation of the assets within the trusts. As a general approach, fixed income market pricing vendors gather market data (including indices and market research reports) and integrate relative credit information, observed market movements, and sector news into proprietary pricing models, pricing systems, and mathematical tools. Dealer quotes and other market information, including live trading levels and pricing analysts' judgments, are also obtained when available. See Note 1 under "Nuclear Decommissioning" for additional information.
Southern Power has contingent payment obligations related to certain acquisitions whereby Southern Power is primarily obligated to make generation-based payments to the seller commencing at the commercial operation date through 2026. The obligation is categorized as Level 3 under Fair Value Measurements as the fair value is determined using significant unobservable inputs for the forecasted facility generation in MW-hours, as well as other inputs such as a fixed dollar amount per MW-hour, and a discount rate, and is evaluated periodically. The fair value of contingent consideration reflects the net present value of expected payments and any periodic change arising from forecasted generation is expected to be immaterial.
"Other investments" include investments that are not traded in the open market. The fair value of these investments has been determined based on market factors including comparable multiples and the expectations regarding cash flows and business plan executions.
As of December 31, 2017 and 2016, the fair value measurements of private equity investments held in the nuclear decommissioning trust that are calculated at net asset value per share (or its equivalent) as a practical expedient, as well as the nature and risks of those investments, were as follows:
 Fair
Value
 Unfunded
Commitments
 Redemption
Frequency
 Redemption 
Notice Period 
 (in millions)



As of December 31, 2017$29

$21

Not Applicable
Not Applicable
As of December 31, 2016$20
 $25
 Not Applicable Not Applicable
Private equity funds include a fund-of-funds that invests in high-quality private equity funds across several market sectors, funds that invest in real estate assets, and a fund that acquires companies to create resale value. Private equity funds do not have redemption rights. Distributions from these funds will be received as the underlying investments in the funds are liquidated. Liquidations are expected to occur at various times over the next 10 years.
As of December 31, 2017 and 2016, other financial instruments for which the carrying amount did not equal fair value were as follows:
 
Carrying
Amount
 
Fair
Value
 (in millions)
Long-term debt, including securities due within one year:   
2017$48,151
 $51,348
2016$45,080
 $46,286
The fair values are determined using Level 2 measurements and are based on quoted market prices for the same or similar issues or on the current rates available to Southern Company, Alabama Power, and Georgia Power Gulffrom negative to stable.
Also on September 28, 2018, Fitch assigned a negative rating outlook to the ratings of Southern Company and its subsidiaries (excluding Mississippi Power).
As a result of the Tax Reform Legislation, certain financial metrics, such as the funds from operations to debt percentage, used by the credit rating agencies to assess Southern Company and its subsidiaries may be negatively impacted. Southern Company and most of its regulated subsidiaries have taken actions to mitigate the resulting impacts, which, among other alternatives, include adjusting capital structure. Absent actions by Southern Company and its subsidiaries that fully mitigate the impacts, the credit ratings of Southern Company and certain of its subsidiaries could be negatively affected. See Note 2 to the financial statements for additional information related to state PSC or other regulatory agency actions related to the Tax Reform Legislation, including approvals of capital structure adjustments for Alabama Power, Mississippi Power, SouthernGeorgia Power, and Southern Company Gas.Atlanta Gas Light by their respective state PSCs, which are expected to help mitigate the potential adverse impacts to certain of their credit metrics.
11. DERIVATIVESMarket Price Risk
The Southern Company system is exposed to market risks, including commodity price risk, interest rate risk, weather risk, and occasionally foreign currency exchange rate risk. To manage the volatility attributable to these exposures, eachthe applicable company nets its

NOTES (continued)
Southern Company and Subsidiary Companies 2017 Annual Report

the exposures, where possible, to take advantage of natural offsets and enters into various derivative transactions for the remaining exposures pursuant to eachthe applicable company's policies in areas such as counterparty exposure and risk management practices. Southern Company Gas' wholesale gas operations use various contracts in its commercial activities that generally meet the definition of derivatives. For the traditional electric operating companies, Southern Power, and Southern Company Gas' other businesses, each company's policy is that derivatives are to be used primarily for hedging purposes and mandates strict adherence to all applicable risk management policies. Derivative positions are monitored using techniques including, but not limited to, market valuation, value at risk, stress testing, and sensitivity analysis. Derivative instruments are recognized

MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS (continued)
Southern Company and Subsidiary Companies 2018 Annual Report


To mitigate future exposure to a change in interest rates, Southern Company and certain of its subsidiaries enter into derivatives that have been designated as hedges. Derivatives that have been designated as hedges outstanding at fair value in the balance sheets as either assets or liabilitiesDecember 31, 2018 have a notional amount of $2.0 billion and are presentedintended to mitigate interest rate volatility related to existing fixed rate obligations. The weighted average interest rate on $5.8 billion of long-term variable interest rate exposure at December 31, 2018 was 3.02%. If Southern Company sustained a net basis.100 basis point change in interest rates for all long-term variable interest rate exposure, the change would affect annualized interest expense by approximately $58 million at December 31, 2018. See Note 10 for additional information. In1 to the financial statements of cash flows, the cash impacts of settled energy-related and interest rate derivatives are recorded as operating activities. The cash impacts of settled foreign currency derivatives are classified as operating or financing activities to correspond with classification of the hedged interest or principal, respectively. See Note 1 under "Financial Instruments" and Note 14 to the financial statements for additional information.
Energy-Related DerivativesSouthern Power Company had foreign currency denominated debt of €1.1 billion at December 31, 2018. Southern Power Company has mitigated its exposure to foreign currency exchange rate risk through the use of foreign currency swaps converting all interest and principal payments to fixed-rate U.S. dollars.
Southern Company and certain subsidiaries enter into energy-related derivatives to hedge exposures to electricity, natural gas, and other fuel price changes. However, dueDue to cost-based rate regulationsregulation and other various cost recovery mechanisms, the traditional electric operating companies and natural gas distribution utilities continue to have limited exposure to market volatility in interest rates, foreign currency exchange rates, commodity fuel prices, and prices of electricity. In addition, Southern Power's exposure to market volatility in commodity fuel prices and prices of electricity is limited because its long-term sales contracts shift substantially all fuel cost responsibility to the purchaser. However, Southern Power has been and may continue to be exposed to market volatility in energy-related commodity prices. Eachprices as a result of uncontracted generating capacity. To mitigate residual risks relative to movements in electricity prices, the traditional electric operating companies and Southern Power may enter into physical fixed-price contracts for the purchase and sale of electricity through the wholesale electricity market and, to a lesser extent, financial hedge contracts for natural gas purchases; however, a significant portion of contracts are priced at market. The traditional electric operating companies and certain of the natural gas distribution utilities manage fuel-hedging programs implemented per the guidelines of their respective state PSCs or other applicable state regulatory agencies, throughagencies. Southern Company had no material change in market risk exposure for the useyear ended December 31, 2018 when compared to the year ended December 31, 2017.
The changes in fair value of financialenergy-related derivative contracts are substantially attributable to both the volume and the price of natural gas. For the years ended December 31, the changes in fair value of energy-related derivative contracts, the majority of which is expected to continue to mitigate price volatility. are composed of regulatory hedges, were as follows:
 2018 2017
 (in millions)
Contracts outstanding at the beginning of the period, assets (liabilities), net$(163) $41
Contracts realized or settled93
 (8)
Current period changes(a)
(131) (196)
Contracts outstanding at the end of the period, assets (liabilities), net(b)(c)
$(201) $(163)
(a)Current period changes also include the changes in fair value of new contracts entered into during the period, if any.
(b)Excludes premium and intrinsic value associated with weather derivatives of $8 million and $11 million at December 31, 2018 and 2017, respectively.
(c)
Includes $6 million of net liabilities related to Gulf Power. See Note 15 to the financial statements under "Southern Company's Sale of Gulf Power" for information regarding the sale of Gulf Power on January 1, 2019.
The traditional electric operating companies (with respect to wholesale generating capacity)net hedge volumes of energy-related derivative contracts were 431 million mmBtu and Southern Power have limited exposure to market volatility in energy-related commodity prices because their long-term sales contracts shift substantially all fuel cost responsibility to the purchaser. However,621 million mmBtu at December 31, 2018 and 2017, respectively.
For the traditional electric operating companies and Southern Power, may be exposed tothe weighted average swap contract cost above market volatility in energy-related commodity prices towas approximately $0.12 per mmBtu at December 31, 2018 and $0.15 per mmBtu at December 31, 2017. The majority of the extent any uncontracted capacity is used to sell electricity. Southern Company Gas retains exposure to price changes that can, in a volatile energy market, adversely affect results of operations.
Southern Company Gas also enters into weather derivative contracts as economic hedges of adjusted operating margins in the event of warmer-than-normal weather. Exchange-traded optionsnatural gas hedge gains and losses are carried at fair value, with changes reflected in operating revenues. Non-exchange-traded options are accounted for using the intrinsic value method. Changes in the intrinsic value for non-exchange-traded contracts are reflected in the statements of income.
Energy-related derivative contracts are accounted for under one of three methods:
Regulatory Hedges – Energy-related derivative contracts which are designated as regulatory hedges relate primarily torecovered through the traditional electric operating companies' fuel cost recovery clauses.
At December 31, 2018 and natural gas distribution utilities'2017, a portion of the Southern Company system's energy-related derivative contracts were designated as regulatory hedges and were related to the applicable company's fuel-hedging programs, whereprogram. Therefore, gains and losses are initially recorded as regulatory liabilities and assets, respectively, and then are included in fuel expense as the underlying fuel is used in operations and ultimatelythey are recovered through the respective fuelenergy cost recovery clauses.
Cash Flow Hedges – Gainsclause. Certain other gains and losses on energy-related derivatives, designated as cash flow hedges, (which are mainly used to hedge anticipated purchases and sales) are initially deferred in OCI before being recognized in the statements of income in the same period as the hedged transactions are reflected in earnings.
Not Designatedtransaction. Gains and losses on energy-related derivative contracts that are not designated or fail to qualify as hedges are recognized in the statements of income as incurred.
See Note 14 to the financial statements for additional information.
Some energy-related derivative contracts require physical delivery as opposed to financial settlement, and this type of derivative is both common and prevalent within the electric and natural gas industries. When an energy-related derivative contract is settled physically, any cumulative unrealized gain or loss is reversed and the contract price is recognized in the respective line item representing the actual price of the underlying goods being delivered.
At December 31, 2017, the net volume of energy-related derivative contracts for natural gas positions totaled 621 million mmBtu for theThe Southern Company system withuses exchange-traded market-observable contracts, which are categorized as Level 1 of the longest hedge date of 2021 over which the respective entity is hedging its exposure to the variability in future cash flows for forecasted transactionsfair value hierarchy, and the longest non-hedge date of 2026 for derivatives not designated as hedges.
In addition to the volumes discussed above, the traditional electric operating companies and Southern Power enter into physical natural gas supplyover-the-counter contracts that provide the option to sell back excess gas due to operational constraints. The maximum expected volume of natural gas subject to such a feature is 32 million mmBtu.
The estimated pre-tax gains (losses) related to energy-related derivatives that will be reclassified from accumulated OCI to earnings for the 12-month period ending December 31, 2018 total $(11) million for Southern Company.are not exchange traded but are fair valued using prices which are market
    Table of Contents                                Index to Financial Statements

NOTESMANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS (continued)
Southern Company and Subsidiary Companies 20172018 Annual Report


Interest Rate Derivatives
Southern Companyobservable, and certain subsidiaries may also enterthus fall into interest rate derivatives to hedge exposure to changes in interest rates. The derivatives employed as hedging instruments are structured to minimize ineffectiveness. Derivatives related to existing variable rate securities or forecasted transactions are accounted for as cash flow hedges where the effective portionLevel 2 of the derivatives' fair value gains or losses is recorded in OCI and is reclassified into earnings at the same time the hedged transactions affect earnings, with any ineffectiveness recorded directly to earnings. Derivatives related to existing fixed rate securities are accounted for as fair value hedges, where the derivatives' fair value gains or losses and hedged items' fair value gains or losses are both recorded directly to earnings, providing an offset, with any difference representing ineffectiveness. Fair value gains or losses on derivatives that are not designated or fail to qualify as hedges are recognized in the statements of income as incurred.
At December 31, 2017, the following interest rate derivatives were outstanding:

Notional
Amount

Interest
Rate
Received

Weighted Average Interest
Rate Paid

Hedge
Maturity
Date

Fair Value
Gain (Loss) December 31, 2017

(in millions)






(in millions)
Cash Flow Hedges of Existing Debt








$900

1-month LIBOR
0.79%
March 2018
$1
Fair Value Hedges of Existing Debt







 250
 5.40% 3-month LIBOR + 4.02% June 2018 
 500
 1.95% 3-month LIBOR + 0.76% December 2018 (3)
 200
 4.25% 3-month LIBOR + 2.46% December 2019 (1)
 300
 2.75% 3-month LIBOR + 0.92% June 2020 (2)
 1,500
 2.35% 1-month LIBOR + 0.87% July 2021 (31)
Total$3,650







$(36)
The estimated pre-tax gains (losses) related to interest rate derivatives expected to be reclassified from accumulated OCI to interest expense for the next 12-month period ending December 31, 2018 total $(20) million. Deferred gains and losses are expected to be amortized into earnings through 2046.
Foreign Currency Derivatives
Southern Company and certain subsidiaries may also enter into foreign currency derivatives to hedge exposure to changes in foreign currency exchange rates, such as that arising from the issuance of debt denominated in a currency other than U.S. dollars. Derivatives related to forecasted transactions are accounted for as cash flow hedges where the effective portion of the derivatives' fair value gains or losses is recorded in OCI and is reclassified into earnings at the same time that the hedged transactions affect earnings, including foreign currency gains or losses arising from changes in the U.S. currency exchange rates. Any ineffectiveness is recorded directly to earnings. The derivatives employed as hedging instruments are structured to minimize ineffectiveness.

NOTES (continued)
Southern Company and Subsidiary Companies 2017 Annual Report

At December 31, 2017, the following foreign currency derivatives were outstanding:
 Pay NotionalPay RateReceive NotionalReceive RateHedge
Maturity Date
Fair Value
Gain (Loss) at December 31, 2017
 (in millions) (in millions)  (in millions)
Cash Flow Hedges of Existing Debt     

$677
2.95%600
1.00%June 2022$55

564
3.78%500
1.85%June 202651
Total$1,241
 1,100
  $106
The estimated pre-tax gains (losses) related to foreign currency derivatives that will be reclassified from accumulated OCI to earnings for the next 12-month period ending December 31, 2018 total $(23) million.
Derivative Financial Statement Presentation and Amounts
Southern Company and its subsidiaries enter into derivative contracts that may contain certain provisions that permit intra-contract netting of derivative receivables and payables for routine billing and offsets related to events of default and settlements. Southern Company and certain subsidiaries also utilize master netting agreements to mitigate exposure to counterparty credit risk. These agreements may contain provisions that permit netting across product lines and against cash collateral. Fair value amounts of derivative assets and liabilities on the balance sheets are presented net to the extent that there are netting arrangements or similar agreements with the counterparties.

NOTES (continued)
Southern Company and Subsidiary Companies 2017 Annual Report

At December 31, 2017 and 2016, the fair value hierarchy. See Note 13 to the financial statements for further discussion of fair value measurements. The maturities of the energy-related derivatives, interest rate derivatives, and foreign currency derivatives was reflected in the balance sheets as follows:
 2017 2016
Derivative Category and Balance Sheet LocationAssetsLiabilities AssetsLiabilities
 (in millions)
Derivatives designated as hedging instruments for regulatory purposes     
Energy-related derivatives:     
Other current assets/Other current liabilities$10
$43
 $73
$27
Other deferred charges and assets/Other deferred credits and liabilities7
24
 25
33
Total derivatives designated as hedging instruments for regulatory purposes$17
$67
 $98
$60
Derivatives designated as hedging instruments in cash flow and fair value hedges     
Energy-related derivatives:     
Other current assets/Other current liabilities$3
$14
 $23
$7
Interest rate derivatives:     
Other current assets/Other current liabilities1
4
 12
1
Other deferred charges and assets/Other deferred credits and liabilities
34
 1
28
Foreign currency derivatives:     
Other current assets/Other current liabilities
23
 
25
Other deferred charges and assets/Other deferred credits and liabilities129

 
33
Total derivatives designated as hedging instruments in cash flow and fair value hedges$133
$75
 $36
$94
Derivatives not designated as hedging instruments     
Energy-related derivatives:     
Other current assets/Other current liabilities$380
$437
 $489
$483
Other deferred charges and assets/Other deferred credits and liabilities170
215
 66
81
Interest rate derivatives:     
Other current assets/Other current liabilities

 1

Total derivatives not designated as hedging instruments$550
$652
 $556
$564
Gross amounts recognized$700
$794
 $690
$718
Gross amounts offset(a)
$(405)$(598) $(462)$(524)
Net amounts recognized in the Balance Sheets(b)
$295
$196
 $228
$194
(a)Gross amounts offset include cash collateral held on deposit in broker margin accounts of $193 million and $62 million as of December 31, 2017 and 2016, respectively.
(b)Net amounts of derivative instruments outstanding exclude premiums and intrinsic value associated with weather derivatives of $11 million as of December 31, 2017.

NOTES (continued)
Southern Company and Subsidiary Companies 2017 Annual Report

At derivative contracts at December 31, 2017 and 2016, the pre-tax effects of unrealized derivative gains (losses) arising from energy-related derivatives designated as regulatory hedging instruments and deferred were as follows:
 Unrealized Losses Unrealized Gains
Derivative CategoryBalance Sheet Location2017 2016 Balance Sheet Location2017 2016
  (in millions)  (in millions)
Energy-related derivatives:Other regulatory assets, current$(34) $(16) Other regulatory liabilities, current$7
 $56
 Other regulatory assets, deferred(18) (19) Other regulatory liabilities, deferred1
 12
Total energy-related derivative gains (losses)(*)
 $(52) $(35)  $8
 $68
(*)Fair value gains and losses recorded in regulatory assets and liabilities include cash collateral held on deposit in broker margin accounts of $6 million and $8 million as of December 31, 2017 and 2016, respectively.
For the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016, and 2015, the pre-tax effects of energy-related derivatives, interest rate derivatives, and foreign currency derivatives designated as cash flow hedging instruments on the statements of income2018 were as follows:
Derivatives in Cash Flow Hedging RelationshipsGain (Loss) Recognized in OCI on Derivative (Effective Portion)
Gain (Loss) Reclassified from Accumulated OCI into Income (Effective Portion)

Amount
 Amount
Derivative Category2017
2016
2015
Statements of Income Location2017
2016
2015
 (in millions)
 (in millions)
Energy-related derivatives$(47)
$18

$

Depreciation and amortization$(16)
$2

$










Cost of natural gas(2)
(1)

Interest rate derivatives(2)
(180)
(22)
Interest expense, net of amounts capitalized(21)
(18)
(9)
Foreign currency derivatives140

(58)


Interest expense, net of amounts capitalized(23)
(13)











Other income (expense), net(*)
160

(82)

Total$91

$(220)
$(22)

$98

$(112)
$(9)
 Fair Value Measurements
 December 31, 2018
 
Total
Fair Value
 Maturity
  Year 1 Years 2&3 Years 4&5
 (in millions)
Level 1$(179) $(59) $(86) $(34)
Level 2(22) 20
 (17) (25)
Level 3
 
 
 
Fair value of contracts outstanding at end of period$(201) $(39) $(103) $(59)
(*)
The reclassification from accumulated OCI into other income (expense), net completely offsets currency gains and losses arising from changes in the U.S. currency exchange rates used to record euro-denominated notes.
There was no material ineffectiveness recorded in earnings for any period presented.
For the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016, and 2015, the pre-tax effects of interest rate derivatives designated as fair value hedging instruments were as follows:
Derivatives in Fair Value Hedging Relationships
Gain (Loss)
Derivative CategoryStatements of Income Location2017 2016 2015
  (in millions)
Interest rate derivatives:Interest expense, net of amounts capitalized$(22) $(21) $2
For all years presented, the pre-tax effects of interest rate derivatives designated as fair value hedging instruments were offset by changes to the carrying value of long-term debt.

NOTES (continued)
Southern Company and Subsidiary Companies 2017 Annual Report

For the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016, and 2015, the pre-tax effects of energy-related derivatives not designated as hedging instruments on the statements of income were as follows:
Derivatives Not Designated as Hedging Instruments
Unrealized Gain (Loss) Recognized in Income


Amount
Derivative CategoryStatements of Income Location2017
2016
2015


(in millions)
Energy-related derivativesWholesale electric revenues$(4)
$2

$(5)

Fuel



3

Natural gas revenues(*)
(80)
33



Cost of natural gas(2)
3


Total
$(86)
$38

$(2)
(*)Excludes gains (losses) recorded in natural gas revenues associated with weather derivatives of $23 million and $6 million for the years ended December 31, 2017 and 2016, respectively.
For the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016, and 2015, the pre-tax effects of interest rate derivatives not designated as hedging instruments were immaterial.
Contingent Features
The Company does not have any credit arrangements that would require material changes in payment schedules or terminations as a result of a credit rating downgrade. There are certain derivatives that could require collateral, but not accelerated payment,system is exposed to market price risk in the event of various credit rating changes of certain Southern Company subsidiaries. At December 31, 2017, the Company had no collateral posted with derivativenonperformance by counterparties to satisfy these arrangements.
At December 31, 2017, the fair value of energy-related and interest rate derivative liabilities with contingent features was $15 million and $7 million, respectively. The maximum potential collateral requirements arising from the credit-risk-related contingent features, at a rating below BBB- and/or Baa3, were $14 million and $7 million for energy-related and interest rate derivative contracts, respectively.
Generally, collateral may be provided by a Southern Company guaranty, letter of credit, or cash. If collateral is required, fair value amounts recognized for the right to reclaim cash collateral or the obligation to return cash collateral are not offset against fair value amounts recognized for derivatives executed with the same counterparty.
contracts. The Southern Company system maintains accounts with certain regional transmission organizations to facilitate financial derivative transactions. Based on the value of the positions in these accounts and the associated margin requirements, the Company may be required to post collateral. At December 31, 2017, cash collateral posted in these accounts was immaterial. Southern Company Gas maintains accounts with brokers or the clearing houses of certain exchanges to facilitate financial derivative transactions. Based on the value of the positions in these accounts and the associated margin requirements, Southern Company may be required to deposit cash into these accounts. At December 31, 2017, cash collateral held on deposit in broker margin accounts was $193 million.
Southern Company is exposed to losses related to financial instruments in the event of counterparties' nonperformance. Southern Company only enters into agreements and material transactions with counterparties that have investment grade credit ratings by Moody's and S&P, or with counterparties who have posted collateral to cover potential credit exposure. Therefore, the Southern Company system does not anticipate market risk exposure from nonperformance by the counterparties. For additional information, see Note 1 to the financial statements under "Financial Instruments" and Note 14 to the financial statements.
With the exception of Southern Company Gas' subsidiary, Atlanta Gas Light, and the Southern Company Gas wholesale gas services business, the Southern Company system is not exposed to concentrations of credit risk. Concentration of credit risk occurs at Atlanta Gas Light for amounts billed for services and other costs to its customers, which consist of 15 Marketers in Georgia responsible for the retail sale of natural gas to end-use customers in Georgia. For 2018, the four largest Marketers based on customer count, which includes SouthStar, accounted for 20% of Southern Company Gas' adjusted operating margin. Southern Company Gas' wholesale gas services business has also establisheda concentration of credit risk management policiesfor services it provides to its counterparties as measured by its 30-day receivable exposure plus forward exposure. At December 31, 2018, Southern Company Gas' wholesale gas services business' top 20 counterparties represented approximately 48%, or $298 million, of its total counterparty exposure and controls to determinehad a weighted average S&P equivalent credit rating of A-, all of which is consistent with the prior year.
Southern Company performs periodic reviews of its leveraged lease transactions, both domestic and monitorinternational, and the creditworthiness of counterparties in order to mitigatethe lessees, including a review of the value of the underlying leased assets and the credit ratings of the lessees. Southern Company's exposure to counterparty credit risk. Southern Company may require counterparties to pledge additional collateral when deemed necessary.
In addition, Southern Company Gas conducts credit evaluations and obtains appropriate internal approvals for the counterparty's line of credit before any transaction with the counterparty is executed. In most cases, the counterparty must have an investment grade rating, which includes a minimum long-term debt rating of Baa3 from Moody's and BBB- from S&P. Generally, Southern Company Gas requires credit enhancements by way of a guaranty, cash deposit, or letter of credit for transaction counterparties thatdomestic lease transactions generally do not have investment grade ratings.any credit enhancement mechanisms; however, the lessees in its international lease transactions have pledged various deposits as additional security to secure the obligations. The lessees in Southern Company's international lease transactions are also required to provide additional collateral in the event of a credit downgrade below a certain level.
Capital Requirements and Contractual Obligations
The Southern Company Gassystem's construction program is currently estimated to total approximately $8.0 billion for 2019, $7.7 billion for 2020, $6.7 billion for 2021, $6.3 billion for 2022, and $6.0 billion for 2023. These amounts include expenditures of approximately $1.5 billion, $1.2 billion, $1.0 billion, and $0.5 billion for the construction of Plant Vogtle Units 3 and 4 in 2019, 2020, 2021, and 2022, respectively. These amounts do not include up to approximately $0.5 billion per year on average for 2019 through 2023 for Southern Power's planned expenditures for plant acquisitions and placeholder growth. These amounts also utilizes master netting agreements whenever possibleinclude capital expenditures related to mitigate exposurecontractual purchase commitments for nuclear fuel and capital expenditures covered under LTSAs. Estimated capital expenditures to counterparty credit risk. When Southern Company Gas is engagedcomply with environmental laws and regulations included in more than one outstanding derivative transactionthese amounts are $0.5 billion, $0.2 billion, $0.3 billion, $0.3 billion, and $0.2 billion for 2019, 2020, 2021, 2022, and 2023, respectively. These estimated expenditures do not include any potential compliance costs associated with pending regulation of CO2 emissions from fossil fuel-fired electric generating units. See FUTURE EARNINGS POTENTIAL – "Environmental MattersEnvironmental Laws and Regulations" and " – Global Climate Issues" herein for additional information.
The traditional electric operating companies also anticipate costs associated with closure and monitoring of ash ponds in accordance with the same counterpartyCCR Rule, which are reflected in Southern Company's ARO liabilities. These costs, which are expected to change and could change materially as underlying assumptions are refined and the cost and the method and timing of compliance activities continue to be evaluated, are currently estimated to be approximately $0.5 billion, $0.5 billion, $0.7 billion, $0.9 billion, and $0.9 billion for 2019, 2020, 2021, 2022, and 2023, respectively. See FUTURE EARNINGS POTENTIAL – "Environmental
    Table of Contents                                Index to Financial Statements

NOTESMANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS (continued)
Southern Company and Subsidiary Companies 20172018 Annual Report


MattersEnvironmental Laws and it also has a legally enforceable netting agreement with that counterparty, the "net" mark-to-market exposure represents the netting of the positiveRegulationsCoal Combustion Residuals" herein and negative exposures with that counterparty and a reasonable measure of Southern Company Gas' credit risk. Southern Company Gas also uses other netting agreements with certain counterparties with whom it conducts significant transactions. Master netting agreements enable Southern Company GasNote 6 to net certain assets and liabilities by counterparty. Southern Company Gas also nets across product lines and against cash collateral provided the master netting and cash collateral agreements include such provisions. Southern Company Gas may require counterparties to pledge additional collateral when deemed necessary.
Southern Company does not anticipate a material adverse effect on the financial statements asfor additional information.
The construction programs are subject to periodic review and revision, and actual construction costs may vary from these estimates because of numerous factors. These factors include: changes in business conditions; changes in load projections; changes in environmental laws and regulations; the outcome of any legal challenges to environmental rules; changes in electric generating plants, including unit retirements and replacements and adding or changing fuel sources at existing electric generating units, to meet regulatory requirements; changes in FERC rules and regulations; state regulatory agency approvals; changes in the expected environmental compliance program; changes in legislation; the cost and efficiency of construction labor, equipment, and materials; project scope and design changes; storm impacts; and the cost of capital. In addition, there can be no assurance that costs related to capital expenditures will be fully recovered. Additionally, planned expenditures for plant acquisitions may vary due to market opportunities and Southern Power's ability to execute its growth strategy. See Note 15 to the financial statements under "Southern Power" for additional information regarding Southern Power's plant acquisitions.
The construction program also includes Plant Vogtle Units 3 and 4, which includes components based on new technology that only recently began initial operation in the global nuclear industry at this scale and which may be subject to additional revised cost estimates during construction. The ability to control costs and avoid cost and schedule overruns during the development, construction, and operation of new facilities is subject to a number of factors, including, but not limited to, changes in labor costs, availability, and productivity; challenges with management of contractors, subcontractors, or vendors; adverse weather conditions; shortages, increased costs, or inconsistent quality of equipment, materials, and labor; contractor or supplier delay; non-performance under construction, operating, or other agreements; operational readiness, including specialized operator training and required site safety programs; engineering or design problems; design and other licensing-based compliance matters, including the timely resolution of ITAAC and the related approvals by the NRC; challenges with start-up activities, including major equipment failure and system integration; and/or operational performance. See Note 2 to the financial statements under "Georgia PowerNuclear Construction" for information regarding Plant Vogtle Units 3 and 4 and additional factors that may impact construction expenditures.
As a result of counterparty nonperformance.NRC requirements, Alabama Power and Georgia Power have external trust funds for nuclear decommissioning costs; however, Alabama Power currently has no additional funding requirements. For additional information, see Note 6 to the financial statements under "Nuclear Decommissioning."
12. ACQUISITIONS AND DISPOSITIONS
Southern Company
Merger with Southern Company Gas
Southern Company Gas is an energy services holding company whose primary business isIn addition, as discussed in Note 11 to the distribution of natural gas through the natural gas distribution utilities. On July 1, 2016, Southern Company completed the Merger for a total purchase price of approximately $8.0 billion and Southern Company Gas became a wholly-owned, direct subsidiary of Southern Company.
The Merger was accounted for using the acquisition method of accounting with the assets acquired and liabilities assumed recognized at fair value as of the acquisition date. The following table presents the final purchase price allocation:
Southern Company Gas Purchase Price 
 (in millions)
Current assets$1,557
Property, plant, and equipment10,108
Goodwill5,967
Intangible assets400
Regulatory assets1,118
Other assets229
Current liabilities(2,201)
Other liabilities(4,742)
Long-term debt(4,261)
Noncontrolling interest(174)
Total purchase price$8,001
The excess of the purchase price over the estimated fair values of the assets acquired and liabilities assumed of $6.0 billion is recognized as goodwill, which is primarily attributable to positioningfinancial statements, the Southern Company system provides postretirement benefits to provide naturalthe majority of its employees and funds trusts to the extent required by PSCs, other applicable state regulatory agencies, or the FERC.
Funding requirements related to obligations associated with scheduled maturities of long-term debt, as well as the related interest, derivative obligations, preferred stock dividends of subsidiaries, leases, pipeline charges, storage capacity, gas infrastructuresupply, asset management agreements, other purchase commitments, ARO settlements, and trusts are detailed in the contractual obligations table that follows. See Notes 1, 6, 8, 9, 11, and 14 to meet customers' growing energy needs and to compete for growth across the energy value chain. Southern Company anticipates that much of the value assigned to goodwill will not be deductible for tax purposes.
The valuation of identifiable intangible assets included customer relationships, trade names, and storage and transportation contracts with estimated lives of one to 28 years. The estimated fair value measurements of identifiable intangible assets were primarily based on significant unobservable inputs (Level 3).
The results of operations for Southern Company Gas have been included in Southern Company's consolidated financial statements from the date of acquisition and consist of operating revenues of $3.9 billion and $1.7 billion and net income of $243 million and $114 million for 2017 and 2016, respectively.additional information.
    Table of Contents                                Index to Financial Statements

NOTESMANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS (continued)
Southern Company and Subsidiary Companies 20172018 Annual Report


Contractual Obligations
The following summarized unaudited pro forma consolidated statement of earnings information assumes that the acquisition of Southern Company Gas was completed on January 1, 2015. The summarized unaudited pro forma consolidated statement of earnings information includes adjustments for (i) intercompany sales, (ii) amortization of intangible assets, (iii) adjustments to interest expense to reflect current interest rates on Southern Company Gas debt and additional interest expense associated with borrowings by Southern Company to fund the Merger, and (iv) the elimination of nonrecurring expenses associated with the Merger.system's contractual obligations at December 31, 2018 (excluding Gulf Power) were as follows:
 20162015
   
Operating revenues (in millions)$21,791
$21,430
Net income attributable to Southern Company (in millions)$2,591
$2,665
Basic EPS$2.70
$2.85
Diluted EPS$2.68
$2.84
These unaudited pro forma results are for comparative purposes only and may not be indicative of the results that would have occurred had this acquisition been completed on January 1, 2015 or the results that would be attained in the future.
Acquisition of PowerSecure
In May 2016, Southern Company acquired all of the outstanding stock of PowerSecure, a provider of products and services in the areas of distributed generation, energy efficiency, and utility infrastructure, for $18.75 per common share in cash, resulting in an aggregate purchase price of $429 million. As a result, PowerSecure became a wholly-owned subsidiary of Southern Company.
The acquisition of PowerSecure was accounted for using the acquisition method of accounting with the assets acquired and liabilities assumed recognized at fair value as of the acquisition date. The following table presents the final purchase price allocation:
PowerSecure Purchase Price 
 (in millions)
Current assets$172
Property, plant, and equipment46
Intangible assets106
Goodwill284
Other assets4
Current liabilities(121)
Long-term debt, including current portion(48)
Deferred credits and other liabilities(14)
Total purchase price$429
The excess of the purchase price over the estimated fair values of the assets acquired and liabilities assumed of $284 million was recognized as goodwill, which is primarily attributable to expected business expansion opportunities for PowerSecure. Southern Company anticipates that the majority of the value assigned to goodwill will not be deductible for tax purposes.
The valuation of identifiable intangible assets included customer relationships, trade names, patents, backlog, and software with estimated lives of one to 26 years. The estimated fair value measurements of identifiable intangible assets were primarily based on significant unobservable inputs (Level 3).
The results of operations for PowerSecure have been included in Southern Company's consolidated financial statements from the date of acquisition and are immaterial to the consolidated financial results of Southern Company. Pro forma results of operations have not been presented for the acquisition because the effects of the acquisition were immaterial to Southern Company's consolidated financial results for all periods presented.
Southern Power
During 2017 and 2016, in accordance with its overall growth strategy, Southern Power or one of its wholly-owned subsidiaries, acquired or contracted to acquire the projects discussed below. Also, in March 2016, Southern Power acquired an additional 15% interest in Desert Stateline, 51% of which was initially acquired in 2015. As a result, Southern Power and the class B member are

NOTES (continued)
Southern Company and Subsidiary Companies 2017 Annual Report

now entitled to 66% and 34%, respectively, of all cash distributions from Desert Stateline. In addition, Southern Power will continue to be entitled to substantially all of the federal tax benefits with respect to the transaction. Acquisition-related costs were expensed as incurred and were not material for any of the years presented.
The following table presents Southern Power's acquisition activity for the year ended, and subsequent to, December 31, 2017.
Project FacilityResourceSeller; Acquisition DateApproximate Nameplate Capacity (MW)LocationSouthern Power Percentage OwnershipActual/Expected CODPPA Contract Period
Business Acquisitions During the Year Ended December 31, 2017
BethelWind
Invenergy Wind Global LLC,
January 6, 2017
276Castro County, TX100% January 201712 years
Cactus Flats(a)
WindRES America Developments, Inc.
July 31, 2017
148Concho County, TX100% Third quarter 201812 years and 15 years
Business Acquisitions Subsequent to December 31, 2017
Gaskell West 1Solar
Recurrent Energy Development Holdings, LLC,
January 26, 2018
20Kern County, CA100% of Class B
(b)March
2018
20 years
 2019 2020- 2021 2022- 2023 After 2023 Total
 (in millions)
Long-term debt(a) —
         
Principal$3,133
 $7,204
 $4,354
 $28,950
 $43,641
Interest1,668
 3,082
 2,270
 25,796
 32,816
Preferred stock dividends of subsidiaries(b)
15
 29
 29
 
 73
Financial derivative obligations(c)
610
 243
 109
 
 962
Operating leases(d)
156
 244
 177
 1,040
 1,617
Capital leases(d)
25
 22
 8
 143
 198
Pipeline charges, storage capacity, and gas supply(e)
781
 1,104
 901
 1,871
 4,657
Asset management agreements(f)
10
 8
 
 
 18
Purchase commitments 
        

Capital(g)
7,600
 13,608
 11,486
 
 32,694
Fuel(h)
3,168
 3,854
 1,863
 5,862
 14,747
Purchased power(i)
304
 653
 545
 2,494
 3,996
Other(j)
328
 642
 464
 2,265
 3,699
ARO settlements(k)
451
 1,186
 1,841
 
 3,478
Trusts —        

Nuclear decommissioning(l)
5
 11
 11
 88
 115
Pension and other postretirement benefit plans(m)
137
 265
 
 
 402
Total$18,391
 $32,155
 $24,058
 $68,509
 $143,113
(a)On July
All amounts are reflected based on final maturity dates except for amounts related to FFB borrowings and certain revenue bonds. As it relates to the FFB borrowings, the final maturity date is February 20, 2044; however, principal amortization is reflected beginning in 2020. See Note 8 to the financial statements under "Long-term DebtDOE Loan Guarantee Borrowings" and "Securities Due Within One Year" for additional information. Southern Company and its subsidiaries plan to continue, when economically feasible, to retire higher-cost securities and replace these obligations with lower-cost capital if market conditions permit. Variable rate interest obligations are estimated based on rates at December 31, 2017, Southern Power purchased 100%2018, as reflected in the statements of capitalization. Fixed rates include, where applicable, the Cactus Flats facility and commenced construction. Upon placing the facility in service, Southern Power expectseffects of interest rate derivatives employed to close on a tax equity partnership agreement that has already been executed, subject to various customary conditions at closing, and will then own 100% of the class B membership interests.manage interest rate risk. Long-term debt excludes capital lease amounts (shown separately).
(b)Southern Power owns 100%Represents preferred stock of Alabama Power. Preferred stock does not mature; therefore, amounts are provided for the class B membership interest under a tax equity partnership agreement.
Business Acquisitions During the Year Ended December 31, 2017
Southern Power's aggregate purchase price for acquisitions during the year ended December 31, 2017 was $539 million. The fair values of the assets acquired and liabilities assumed were finalized in 2017 and recorded as follows:
 2017
 (in millions)
Restricted cash$16
CWIP534
Other assets5
Accounts payable(16)
Total purchase price$539
In 2017, total revenues of $15 million and net income of $17 million, primarily as a result of PTCs, was recognized by Southern Power related to the 2017 acquisitions. The Bethel facility did not have operating revenues or activities prior to completion of construction and being placed in service, and the Cactus Flats facility is still under construction. Therefore, supplemental pro forma information as though the acquisitions occurred as of the beginning of 2017 and for the comparable 2016 period is not meaningful and has been omitted.
Construction Projects in Progress
During the year ended December 31, 2017, in accordance with its overall growth strategy, Southern Power continued construction on the 345-MW Mankato expansion project and commenced construction on the Cactus Flats facility. Total aggregate construction costs for these facilities, excluding acquisition costs and including construction costs to complete the subsequently-acquired Gaskell West 1 solar project, are expected to be between $385 million and $430 million. At December 31, 2017, construction costs included in CWIP related to these projects totaled $188 million. The ultimate outcome of these matters cannot be determined at this time.
Development Projects
During 2017, as part of Southern Power's renewable development strategy, Southern Power purchased wind turbine equipment from Siemens Wind Power, Inc. and Vestas-American Wind Technology, Inc. to be used for various development and construction

NOTES (continued)
Southern Company and Subsidiary Companies 2017 Annual Report

projects, up to 900 MWs in total. Once these wind projects reach commercial operations, which is expected in 2021, they are expected to qualify for 80% PTCs.
During 2016, Southern Power entered into a joint development agreement with Renewable Energy Systems Americas, Inc. to develop and construct approximately 3,000 MWs of wind projects expected to be placed in service between 2018 and 2020. In addition, in 2016, Southern Power purchased wind turbine equipment from Siemens Wind Power, Inc. and Vestas-American Wind Technology, Inc. to be used for construction of the facilities. Once these wind projects reach commercial operations, they are expected to qualify for 100% PTCs.
The ultimate outcome of these matters cannot be determined at this time.
The following table presents Southern Power's acquisitions for the year ended December 31, 2016.
Project FacilityResourceSeller, Acquisition Date
Approximate
Nameplate Capacity (
MW)
 LocationOwnership PercentageActual CODPPA
Contract Period
Acquisitions for the Year Ended December 31, 2016
Boulder 1SolarSunPower
November 16, 2016
100 Clark County, NV51%(a)December 201620 years
CalipatriaSolarSolar Frontier Americas Holding LLC
February 11, 2016
20 Imperial County, CA100%(b)February 201620 years
East PecosSolarFirst Solar, Inc.
March 4, 2016
120 Pecos County, TX100% March 201715 years
Grant PlainsWindApex Clean Energy Holdings, LLC
August 26, 2016
147 Grant County, OK100% December 2016
20 years and 12 years (c)
Grant WindWindApex Clean Energy Holdings, LLC
April 7, 2016
151 Grant County, OK100% April 201620 years
HenriettaSolarSunPower
July 1, 2016
102 Kings County, CA51%(a)July 201620 years
LamesaSolarRES America Developments Inc.
July 1, 2016
102 Dawson County, TX100% April 201715 years
Mankato (d)
Natural GasCalpine Corporation October 26, 2016375 Mankato, MN100% 
N/A (e)
10 years
PassadumkeagWindQuantum Utility Generation, LLC
June 30, 2016
42 Penobscot County, ME100% July 201615 years
RutherfordSolarCypress Creek Renewables, LLC
July 1, 2016
74 Rutherford County, NC100%(b)December 201615 years
Salt ForkWindEDF Renewable Energy, Inc.
December 1, 2016
174 Donley and Gray Counties, TX100% December 201614 years and 12 years
Tyler BluffWindEDF Renewable Energy, Inc.
December 21, 2016
125 Cooke County, TX100% December 201612 years
Wake WindWindInvenergy
October 26, 2016
257 Floyd and Crosby Counties, TX90.1%(f)October 201612 years
(a)Southern Power owns 100% of the class A membership interests and a wholly-owned subsidiary of the seller owns 100% of the class B membership interests. Southern Power and the class B member are entitled to 51% and 49%, respectively, of all cash distributions from the project. In addition, Southern Power is entitled to substantially all of the federal tax benefits with respect to the transaction.
(b)Southern Power originally purchased 90%, with a minority owner owning 10%. During 2017, Southern Power acquired the remaining 10% ownership interest.next five years only.
(c)In additionSee Notes 1 and 14 to the 20-year and 12-year PPAs, the facility has a 10-year contract with Allianz Risk Transfer (Bermuda) Ltd.financial statements.
(d)Under the terms of the PPAExcludes PPAs that are accounted for as leases and the expansion PPA, approximately $442 million of assets, primarily related to property, plant, and equipment, are subject to lien at December 31, 2017.included in "Purchased power."
(e)Includes charges recoverable through a natural gas cost recovery mechanism, or alternatively billed to Marketers selling retail natural gas, and demand charges associated with Southern Company Gas' wholesale gas services. The acquisition included a fully operational 375-MWgas supply balance includes amounts for gas commodity purchase commitments associated with Southern Company Gas' gas marketing services of 47 million mmBtu at floating gas prices calculated using forward natural gas-fired combined-cycle facility.gas prices at December 31, 2018 and valued at $150 million. Southern Company Gas provides guarantees to certain gas suppliers for certain of its subsidiaries in support of payment obligations.
(f)Represents fixed-fee minimum payments for asset management agreements associated with wholesale gas services.
(g)
The Southern Power owns 90.1%,Company system provides estimated capital expenditures for a five-year period, including capital expenditures associated with environmental regulations. These amounts exclude contractual purchase commitments for nuclear fuel, capital expenditures covered under LTSAs, and estimated capital expenditures for AROs, which are reflected in "Fuel," "Other," and "ARO settlements," respectively. These amounts also exclude up to approximately $0.5 billion per year on average for 2019 through 2023 for Southern Power's planned expenditures for plant acquisitions and placeholder growth. At December 31, 2018, significant purchase commitments were outstanding in connection with the minority owner, Invenergy Wind Global LLC, owning 9.9%.construction program. See FUTURE EARNINGS POTENTIAL – "Environmental MattersEnvironmental Laws and Regulations" and "Construction Programs" herein for additional information.
(h)Primarily includes commitments to purchase coal, nuclear fuel, and natural gas, as well as the related transportation and storage. In most cases, these contracts contain provisions for price escalation, minimum purchase levels, and other financial commitments. Natural gas purchase commitments are based on various indices at the time of delivery. Amounts reflected for natural gas purchase commitments have been estimated based on the NYMEX future prices at December 31, 2018.
(i)
Estimated minimum long-term obligations for various PPA purchases from gas-fired, biomass, and wind-powered facilities and capacity payments related to Plant Vogtle Units 1 and 2. See Note 9 to the financial statements under "Fuel and Power Purchase Agreements" for additional information.
    Table of Contents                                Index to Financial Statements

NOTESMANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS (continued)
Southern Company and Subsidiary Companies 20172018 Annual Report


Acquisitions During the Year Ended December 31, 2016
Southern Power's aggregate purchase price for acquisitions during the year ended December 31, 2016 was approximately $2.3 billion. The total aggregate purchase price including minority ownership contributions and the assumption of non-recourse construction debt to Southern Power was approximately $2.6 billion for these acquisitions. In connection with Southern Power's 2016 acquisitions, allocations of the purchase price to individual assets were finalized during the year ended December 31, 2017 with no changes to amounts originally reported for Boulder 1, Grant Plains, Grant Wind, Henrietta, Mankato, Passadumkeag, Salt Fork, Tyler Bluff, and Wake Wind. The fair values of the assets and liabilities acquired through the business combinations were recorded as follows:
 2016
 (in millions)
CWIP$2,354
Property, plant, and equipment302
Intangible assets (a)
128
Other assets52
Accounts payable(16)
Debt(217)
Total purchase price$2,603
  
Funded by: 
Southern Power (b) (c)
$2,345
Noncontrolling interests (d) (e)
258
Total purchase price$2,603
(a)(j)Intangible assets consistIncludes LTSAs, contracts for the procurement of acquired PPAs that will be amortized over 10-limestone, contractual environmental remediation liabilities, and 20-year terms. The estimated amortization for future periods is approximately $9 million per year. See Note 1 for additional information.operation and maintenance agreements. LTSAs include price escalation based on inflation indices.
(b)At December 31, 2016, $461 million is included in acquisitions payable on the balance sheets.
(c)Includes approximately $281 million of contingent consideration, of which $29 million was payable at December 31, 2017.
(d)Includes approximately $51 million of non-cash contributions recorded as capital contributions from noncontrolling interests in the statements of stockholders' equity.
(e)Includes approximately $142 million of contingent consideration, all of which had been paid at December 31, 2016 by the noncontrolling interests.
Southern Company Gas
Investment in Southern Natural Gas
In September 2016, Southern Company Gas completed its acquisition from Kinder Morgan, Inc. of a 50% equity interest in Southern Natural Gas Company, L.L.C. (SNG), which is the owner of a 7,000-mile pipeline system connecting natural gas supply basins in Texas, Louisiana, Mississippi, and Alabama to markets in Louisiana, Mississippi, Alabama, Florida, Georgia, South Carolina, and Tennessee. The purchase price of the acquisition was approximately $1.4 billion. The investment in SNG is accounted for using the equity method.
Acquisition of Remaining Interest in SouthStar
SouthStar Energy Services, LLC (SouthStar) is a retail natural gas marketer and markets natural gas to residential, commercial, and industrial customers, primarily in Georgia and Illinois. Southern Company Gas previously had an 85% ownership interest in SouthStar, with Piedmont Natural Gas Company, Inc.'s (Piedmont) owning the remaining 15%. In October 2016, Southern Company Gas purchased Piedmont's 15% interest in SouthStar for $160 million.
Proposed Sale of Elizabethtown Gas and Elkton Gas
On October 15, 2017, Southern Company Gas subsidiary, Pivotal Utility Holdings, entered into agreements for the sale of the assets of two of its natural gas distribution utilities, Elizabethtown Gas and Elkton Gas, to South Jersey Industries, Inc. for a total cash purchase price of $1.7 billion. The completion of each asset sale is subject to the satisfaction or waiver of certain conditions, including, among other customary closing conditions, the receipt of required regulatory approvals, including the FERC, the Federal Communications Commission, the New Jersey BPU, and, with respect to the sale of Elkton Gas, the Maryland PSC. Southern Company Gas and South Jersey Industries, Inc. made joint filings on December 22, 2017 and January 16, 2018 with the

NOTES (continued)
Southern Company and Subsidiary Companies 2017 Annual Report

New Jersey BPU and the Maryland PSC, respectively, requesting regulatory approval. The asset sales are expected to be completed by the end of the third quarter 2018.
The ultimate outcome of these matters cannot be determined at this time.
13. SEGMENT AND RELATED INFORMATION
The primary businesses of the Southern Company system are electricity sales by the traditional electric operating companies and Southern Power and the distribution of natural gas by Southern Company Gas. The four traditional electric operating companies – Alabama Power, Georgia Power, Gulf Power, and Mississippi Power – are vertically integrated utilities providing electric service in four Southeastern states. Southern Power develops, constructs, acquires, owns, and manages power generation assets, including renewable energy projects, and sells electricity at market-based rates in the wholesale market. Southern Company Gas distributes natural gas through the natural gas distribution utilities in seven states and is involved in several other complementary businesses including gas marketing services, wholesale gas services, and gas midstream operations.
Southern Company's reportable business segments are the sale of electricity by the four traditional electric operating companies, the sale of electricity in the competitive wholesale market by Southern Power, and the sale of natural gas and other complementary products and services by Southern Company Gas. Revenues from sales by Southern Power to the traditional electric operating companies were $392 million, $419 million, and $417 million in 2017, 2016, and 2015, respectively. Revenues from sales of natural gas from Southern Company Gas to the traditional electric operating companies and Southern Power were $23 million and $119 million, respectively, in 2017 and $11 million and $17 million, respectively, in 2016. The "All Other" column includes the Southern Company parent entity, which does not allocate operating expenses to business segments. Also, this category includes segments below the quantitative threshold for separate disclosure. These segments include providing energy technologies and services to electric utilities and large industrial, commercial, institutional, and municipal customers; as well as investments in telecommunications and leveraged lease projects. All other inter-segment revenues are not material. Financial data for business segments and products and services for the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016, and 2015 was as follows:

NOTES (continued)
Southern Company and Subsidiary Companies 2017 Annual Report

 Electric Utilities    
 
Traditional
Electric
Operating
Companies
Southern
Power
EliminationsTotalSouthern Company Gas
All
Other
EliminationsConsolidated
 (in millions)
2017        
Operating revenues$16,884
$2,075
$(419)$18,540
$3,920
$741
$(170)$23,031
Depreciation and amortization1,954
503

2,457
501
52

3,010
Interest income14
7

21
3
11
(9)26
Earnings from equity method investments1


1
106
(1)
106
Interest expense820
191

1,011
200
490
(7)1,694
Income taxes1,021
(939)
82
367
(307)
142
Segment net income (loss)(a)(b)(c)
(193)1,071

878
243
(279)
842
Total assets72,204
15,206
(325)87,085
22,987
2,552
(1,619)111,005
Gross property additions3,836
268

4,104
1,525
355

5,984
2016        
Operating revenues$16,803
$1,577
$(439)$17,941
$1,652
$463
$(160)$19,896
Depreciation and amortization1,881
352

2,233
238
31

2,502
Interest income6
7

13
2
20
(15)20
Earnings from equity method investments2


2
60
(3)
59
Interest expense814
117

931
81
317
(12)1,317
Income taxes1,286
(195)
1,091
76
(216)
951
Segment net income (loss)(a) (b)
2,233
338

2,571
114
(230)(7)2,448
Total assets72,141
15,169
(316)86,994
21,853
2,474
(1,624)109,697
Gross property additions4,852
2,114

6,966
618
41
(1)7,624
2015        
Operating revenues$16,491
$1,390
$(439)$17,442
$
$152
$(105)$17,489
Depreciation and amortization1,772
248

2,020

14

2,034
Interest income19
2
1
22

6
(5)23
Earnings from equity method investments1


1

(1)

Interest expense697
77

774

69
(3)840
Income taxes1,305
21

1,326

(132)
1,194
Segment net income (loss)(a) (b)
2,186
215

2,401

(32)(2)2,367
Total assets69,052
8,905
(397)77,560

1,819
(1,061)78,318
Gross property additions5,124
1,005

6,129

40

6,169
(a)Attributable to Southern Company.
(b)(k)
Segment net income (loss)Represents estimated costs for a five-year period associated with closing and monitoring ash ponds in accordance with the traditional electric operating companies includes pre-tax chargesCCR Rule and the related state rules, which are reflected in Southern Company's ARO liabilities. Material expenditures in future years for estimated probable losses on the Kemper IGCC of $3.4 billion ($2.4 billion after tax)ARO settlements also will be required for ash ponds, nuclear decommissioning, and other liabilities reflected in 2017, $428 million ($264 million after tax) in 2016, and $365 million ($226 million after tax) in 2015.Southern Company's AROs. See Note 3 underFUTURE EARNINGS POTENTIAL – "Kemper County Energy FacilityEnvironmental MattersScheduleEnvironmental Laws and Cost EstimateRegulationsCoal Combustion Residuals" herein and Note 6 to the financial statements for additional information.
(c)(l)Segment net income (loss)
Projections of nuclear decommissioning trust fund contributions for Plant Hatch and Plant Vogtle Units 1 and 2 are based on the 2013 ARP for Georgia Power. Alabama Power also has external trust funds for nuclear decommissioning costs; however, Alabama Power currently has no additional funding requirements. See Note 6 to the financial statements under "Nuclear Decommissioning" for additional information.
(m)The Southern Company system forecasts contributions to the pension and other postretirement benefit plans over a three-year period. Southern Company anticipates no mandatory contributions to the qualified pension plans during the next three years. Amounts presented represent estimated benefit payments for the traditional electric operating companies also includes a pre-tax chargenonqualified pension plans, estimated non-trust benefit payments for the write-downother postretirement benefit plans, and estimated contributions to the other postretirement benefit plan trusts, all of Gulf Power's ownershipwhich will be made from corporate assets of Plant Scherer Unit 3 of $33 million ($20 million after tax) in 2017.Southern Company's subsidiaries. See Note 3 under "Regulatory Matters – Gulf Power – Retail Base Rate Cases"11 to the financial statements for additional information.information related to the pension and other postretirement benefit plans, including estimated benefit payments. Certain benefit payments will be made through the related benefit plans. Other benefit payments will be made from corporate assets of Southern Company's subsidiaries.

NOTES (continued)
Southern Company and Subsidiary Companies 2017 Annual Report

Products and Services
Electric Utilities' Revenues
YearRetail Wholesale Other Total
 (in millions)
2017$15,330
 $2,426
 $784
 $18,540
201615,234
 1,926
 781
 17,941
201514,987
 1,798
 657
 17,442
Southern Company Gas' Revenues
YearGas
Distribution
Operations
 Gas
Marketing
Services
 All Other Total
 (in millions)
2017$3,024
 $860
 $36
 $3,920
20161,266
 354
 32
 1,652
    Table of Contents                                Index to Financial Statements

NOTES (continued)
Southern Company and Subsidiary Companies 2017 Annual Report

14. QUARTERLY FINANCIAL INFORMATION (UNAUDITED)
Summarized quarterly financial information for 2017 and 2016 is as follows:
     Consolidated Net Income Attributable to Southern Company Per Common Share
 
Operating
Revenues
 
Operating
Income
  
Basic
Earnings
 Diluted Earnings   
Trading
Price Range
Quarter Ended Dividends High Low
 (in millions)          
March 2017$5,771
 $1,306
 $658
 $0.66
 $0.66
 $0.5600
 $51.47
 $47.57
June 20175,430
 (1,594) (1,381) (1.38) (1.37) 0.5800
 51.97
 47.87
September 20176,201
 2,045
 1,069
 1.07
 1.06
 0.5800
 50.80
 46.71
December 20175,629
 794
 496
 0.49
 0.49
 0.5800
 53.51
 47.92
                
March 2016$3,992
 $940
 $489
 $0.53
 $0.53
 $0.5425
 $51.73
 $46.00
June 20164,459
 1,185
 623
 0.67
 0.66
 0.5600
 53.64
 47.62
September 20166,264
 1,917
 1,139
 1.18
 1.17
 0.5600
 54.64
 50.00
December 20165,181
 587
 197
 0.20
 0.20
 0.5600
 52.23
 46.20
As a result of the revisions to the cost estimate for the Kemper IGCC and its June 2017 suspension, Mississippi Power recorded total pre-tax charges to income related to the Kemper IGCC of $208 million ($185 million after tax) in the fourth quarter 2017, $34 million ($21 million after tax) in the third quarter 2017, $3.0 billion ($2.1 billion after tax) in the second quarter 2017, $108 million ($67 million after tax) in the first quarter 2017, $206 million ($127 million after tax) in the fourth quarter 2016, $88 million ($54 million after tax) in the third quarter 2016, $81 million ($50 million after tax) in the second quarter 2016, and $53 million ($33 million after tax) in the first quarter 2016. See Note 3 under "Kemper County Energy Facility" for additional information.
As a result of the Tax Reform Legislation, the Southern Company system recorded a total income tax benefit of $264 million in the fourth quarter 2017. See Note 5 for additional information.
The Southern Company system's business is influenced by seasonal weather conditions.

SELECTED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL AND OPERATING DATA
For the Periods Ended December 2013 through 2017
Southern Company and Subsidiary Companies 2017 Annual Report
 2017
 
2016(a)

 2015
 2014
 2013
Operating Revenues (in millions)$23,031
 $19,896
 $17,489
 $18,467
 $17,087
Total Assets (in millions)(b)(c)
$111,005
 $109,697
 $78,318
 $70,233
 $64,264
Gross Property Additions (in millions)$5,984
 $7,624
 $6,169
 $6,522
 $5,868
Return on Average Common Equity (percent)(d)
3.44
 10.80
 11.68
 10.08
 8.82
Cash Dividends Paid Per Share of
 Common Stock
$2.3000
 $2.2225
 $2.1525
 $2.0825
 $2.0125
Consolidated Net Income Attributable to
   Southern Company (in millions)(d)
$842
 $2,448
 $2,367
 $1,963
 $1,644
Earnings Per Share —         
Basic$0.84
 $2.57
 $2.60
 $2.19
 $1.88
Diluted0.84
 2.55
 2.59
 2.18
 1.87
Capitalization (in millions):         
Common stock equity$24,167
 $24,758
 $20,592
 $19,949
 $19,008
Preferred and preference stock of subsidiaries and
   noncontrolling interests
1,361
 1,854
 1,390
 977
 756
Redeemable preferred stock of subsidiaries324
 118
 118
 375
 375
Redeemable noncontrolling interests
 164
 43
 39
 
Long-term debt(b)
44,462
 42,629
 24,688
 20,644
 21,205
Total (excluding amounts due within one year)$70,314
 $69,523
 $46,831
 $41,984
 $41,344
Capitalization Ratios (percent):         
Common stock equity34.4
 35.6
 44.0
 47.5
 46.0
Preferred and preference stock of subsidiaries and
   noncontrolling interests
1.9
 2.7
 3.0
 2.3
 1.8
Redeemable preferred stock of subsidiaries0.5
 0.2
 0.3
 0.9
 0.9
Redeemable noncontrolling interests
 0.2
 0.1
 0.1
 
Long-term debt(b)
63.2
 61.3
 52.6
 49.2
 51.3
Total (excluding amounts due within one year)100.0
 100.0
 100.0
 100.0
 100.0
Other Common Stock Data:         
Book value per share$23.99
 $25.00
 $22.59
 $21.98
 $21.43
Market price per share:         
High$53.51
 $54.64
 $53.16
 $51.28
 $48.74
Low46.71
 46.00
 41.40
 40.27
 40.03
Close (year-end)48.09
 49.19
 46.79
 49.11
 41.11
Market-to-book ratio (year-end) (percent)200.5
 196.8
 207.2
 223.4
 191.8
Price-earnings ratio (year-end) (times)57.3
 19.1
 18.0
 22.4
 21.9
Dividends paid (in millions)$2,300
 $2,104
 $1,959
 $1,866
 $1,762
Dividend yield (year-end) (percent)4.8
 4.5
 4.6
 4.2
 4.9
Dividend payout ratio (percent)273.2
 86.0
 82.7
 95.0
 107.1
Shares outstanding (in thousands):         
Average1,000,336
 951,332
 910,024
 897,194
 876,755
Year-end1,007,603
 990,394
 911,721
 907,777
 887,086
Stockholders of record (year-end)120,803
 126,338
 131,771
 137,369
 143,800
(a)The 2016 selected financial and operating data includes the operations of Southern Company Gas from the date of the Merger, July 1, 2016, through December 31, 2016. See Note 12 under "Merger with Southern Company Gas" for additional information.
(b)A reclassification of debt issuance costs from Total Assets to Long-term debt of $202 million and $139 million is reflected for years 2014 and 2013, respectively, in accordance with new accounting standards adopted in 2015 and applied retrospectively.
(c)A reclassification of deferred tax assets from Total Assets of $488 million and $143 million is reflected for years 2014 and 2013, respectively, in accordance with new accounting standards adopted in 2015 and applied retrospectively.
(d)A significant loss to income was recorded by Mississippi Power related to the suspension of the Kemper IGCC in June 2017. Earnings in all periods presented were impacted by losses related to the Kemper IGCC.

SELECTED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL AND OPERATING DATA (continued)
For the Periods Ended December 2013 through 2017
Southern Company and Subsidiary Companies 2017 Annual Report
 2017
 
2016(a)

 2015
 2014
 2013
Operating Revenues (in millions):         
Residential$6,515
 $6,614
 $6,383
 $6,499
 $6,011
Commercial5,439
 5,394
 5,317
 5,469
 5,214
Industrial3,262
 3,171
 3,172
 3,449
 3,188
Other114
 55
 115
 133
 128
Total retail15,330
 15,234
 14,987
 15,550
 14,541
Wholesale2,426
 1,926
 1,798
 2,184
 1,855
Total revenues from sales of electricity17,756
 17,160
 16,785
 17,734
 16,396
Natural gas revenues3,791
 1,596
 
 
 
Other revenues1,484
 1,140
 704
 733
 691
Total$23,031
 $19,896
 $17,489
 $18,467
 $17,087
Kilowatt-Hour Sales (in millions):         
Residential50,536
 53,337
 52,121
 53,347
 50,575
Commercial52,340
 53,733
 53,525
 53,243
 52,551
Industrial52,785
 52,792
 53,941
 54,140
 52,429
Other846
 883
 897
 909
 902
Total retail156,507
 160,745
 160,484
 161,639
 156,457
Wholesale sales49,034
 37,043
 30,505
 32,786
 26,944
Total205,541
 197,788
 190,989
 194,425
 183,401
Average Revenue Per Kilowatt-Hour (cents):         
Residential12.89
 12.40
 12.25
 12.18
 11.89
Commercial10.39
 10.04
 9.93
 10.27
 9.92
Industrial6.18
 6.01
 5.88
 6.37
 6.08
Total retail9.80
 9.48
 9.34
 9.62
 9.29
Wholesale4.95
 5.20
 5.89
 6.66
 6.88
Total sales8.64
 8.68
 8.79
 9.12
 8.94
Average Annual Kilowatt-Hour         
Use Per Residential Customer11,618
 12,387
 13,318
 13,765
 13,144
Average Annual Revenue         
Per Residential Customer$1,498
 $1,541
 $1,630
 $1,679
 $1,562
Plant Nameplate Capacity         
Ratings (year-end) (megawatts)46,936
 46,291
 44,223
 46,549
 45,502
Maximum Peak-Hour Demand (megawatts):         
Winter31,956
 32,272
 36,794
 37,234
 27,555
Summer34,874
 35,781
 36,195
 35,396
 33,557
System Reserve Margin (at peak) (percent)(b)
30.8
 34.2
 33.2
 19.8
 21.5
Annual Load Factor (percent)61.4
 61.5
 59.9
 59.6
 63.2
Plant Availability (percent):         
Fossil-steam84.5
 86.4
 86.1
 85.8
 87.7
Nuclear94.7
 93.3
 93.5
 91.5
 91.5
(a)The 2016 selected financial and operating data includes the operations of Southern Company Gas from the date of the Merger, July 1, 2016, through December 31, 2016. See Note 12 under "Merger with Southern Company Gas" for additional information.
(b)Beginning in 2014, system reserve margin is calculated to include unrecognized capacity.

SELECTED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL AND OPERATING DATA (continued)
For the Periods Ended December 2013 through 2017
Southern Company and Subsidiary Companies 2017 Annual Report
 2017
 
2016(a)

 2015
 2014
 2013
Source of Energy Supply (percent):         
Coal27.0
 30.3
 32.3
 39.3
 36.9
Nuclear14.5
 14.5
 15.2
 14.8
 15.5
Oil and gas41.9
 41.7
 42.7
 37.0
 37.2
Hydro2.1
 2.1
 2.6
 2.5
 3.9
Other5.4
 2.4
 0.8
 0.4
 0.1
Purchased power9.1
 9.0
 6.4
 6.0
 6.4
Total100.0
 100.0
 100.0
 100.0
 100.0
Gas Sales Volumes (mmBtu in millions):         
Firm667
 296
 
 
 
Interruptible95
 53
 
 
 
Total762
 349
 
 
 
Traditional Electric Operating Company
   Customers (year-end) (in thousands):
         
Residential4,011
 3,970
 3,928
 3,890
 3,859
Commercial(b)
599
 595
 590
 586
 582
Industrial(b)
18
 17
 17
 17
 17
Other12
 11
 11
 11
 9
Total electric customers4,640
 4,593
 4,546
 4,504
 4,467
Gas distribution operations customers4,623
 4,586
 
 
 
Total utility customers9,263
 9,179
 4,546
 4,504
 4,467
Employees (year-end)31,344
 32,015
 26,703
 26,369
 26,300
(a)The 2016 selected financial and operating data includes the operations of Southern Company Gas from the date of the Merger, July 1, 2016, through December 31, 2016. See Note 12 under "Merger with Southern Company Gas" for additional information.
(b)A reclassification of customers from commercial to industrial is reflected for years 2013-2015 to be consistent with the rate structure approved by the Georgia PSC. The impact to operating revenues, kilowatt-hour sales, and average revenue per kilowatt-hour by class is not material.


ALABAMA POWER COMPANY
FINANCIAL SECTION

MANAGEMENT'S REPORT ON INTERNAL CONTROL OVER FINANCIAL REPORTING
Alabama Power Company 2017 Annual Report
The management of Alabama Power Company (the Company) is responsible for establishing and maintaining an adequate system of internal control over financial reporting as required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and as defined in Exchange Act Rule 13a-15(f). A control system can provide only reasonable, not absolute, assurance that the objectives of the control system are met.
Under management's supervision, an evaluation of the design and effectiveness of the Company's internal control over financial reporting was conducted based on the framework in Internal Control—Integrated Framework (2013) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission. Based on this evaluation, management concluded that the Company's internal control over financial reporting was effective as of December 31, 2017.

/s/ Mark A. Crosswhite
Mark A. Crosswhite
Chairman, President, and Chief Executive Officer

/s/ Philip C. Raymond
Philip C. Raymond
Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer, and Treasurer
February 20, 2018


REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
To the stockholders and the Board of Directors of Alabama Power Company
Opinion on the Financial Statements
We have audited the accompanying balance sheets and statements of capitalization of Alabama Power Company (the Company) (a wholly-owned subsidiary of The Southern Company) as of December 31, 2017 and 2016, the related statements of income, comprehensive income, common stockholder's equity, and cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2017, and the related notes (collectively referred to as the "financial statements"). In our opinion, the financial statements (pages II-186 to II-231) present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of the Company as of December 31, 2017 and 2016, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2017, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.
Basis for Opinion
These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Company's financial statements based on our audits. We are a public accounting firm registered with the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (PCAOB) and are required to be independent with respect to the Company in accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.
We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement, whether due to error or fraud. The Company is not required to have, nor were we engaged to perform, an audit of its internal control over financial reporting. As part of our audits, we are required to obtain an understanding of internal control over financial reporting but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Company's internal control over financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion.
Our audits included performing procedures to assess the risks of material misstatement of the financial statements, whether due to error or fraud, and performing procedures that respond to those risks. Such procedures included examining, on a test basis, evidence regarding the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. Our audits also included evaluating the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the financial statements. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
/s/ Deloitte & Touche LLP
Birmingham, Alabama
February 20, 2018
We have served as the Company's auditor since 2002.

DEFINITIONS
TermMeaning
AFUDCAllowance for funds used during construction
AROAsset retirement obligation
ASCAccounting Standards Codification
ASUAccounting Standards Update
CCRCoal combustion residuals
Clean Air ActClean Air Act Amendments of 1990
CO2
Carbon dioxide
DOEU.S. Department of Energy
EPAU.S. Environmental Protection Agency
FASBFinancial Accounting Standards Board
FERCFederal Energy Regulatory Commission
GAAPU.S. generally accepted accounting principles
Georgia PowerGeorgia Power Company
Gulf PowerGulf Power Company
IRSInternal Revenue Service
ITCInvestment tax credit
KWHKilowatt-hour
LIBORLondon Interbank Offered Rate
Mississippi PowerMississippi Power Company
mmBtuMillion British thermal units
Moody'sMoody's Investors Service, Inc.
MWMegawatt
NDRNatural Disaster Reserve
NOX
Nitrogen oxide
NRCU.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission
OCIOther comprehensive income
power poolThe operating arrangement whereby the integrated generating resources of the traditional electric operating companies and Southern Power (excluding subsidiaries) are subject to joint commitment and dispatch in order to serve their combined load obligations
PPAPower purchase agreement
PSCPublic Service Commission
Rate CNPRate Certificated New Plant
Rate CNP ComplianceRate Certificated New Plant Compliance
Rate CNP PPARate Certificated New Plant Power Purchase Agreement
Rate ECRRate Energy Cost Recovery
Rate NDRRate Natural Disaster Reserve
Rate RSERate Stabilization and Equalization plan
ROEReturn on equity
S&PS&P Global Ratings, a division of S&P Global Inc.
SCSSouthern Company Services, Inc. (the Southern Company system service company)
SECU.S. Securities and Exchange Commission
SEGCOSouthern Electric Generating Company
SO2
Sulfur dioxide
Southern CompanyThe Southern Company
Southern Company GasSouthern Company Gas and its subsidiaries

DEFINITIONS
(continued)

TermMeaning
Southern Company systemSouthern Company, the traditional electric operating companies, Southern Power, Southern Company Gas (as of July 1, 2016), SEGCO, Southern Nuclear, SCS, Southern Linc, PowerSecure, Inc. (as of May 9, 2016), and other subsidiaries
Southern LincSouthern Communications Services, Inc.
Southern NuclearSouthern Nuclear Operating Company, Inc.
Southern PowerSouthern Power Company and its subsidiaries
Tax Reform LegislationThe Tax Cuts and Jobs Act, which was signed into law on December 22, 2017 and became effective on January 1, 2018
traditional electric operating companiesAlabama Power Company, Georgia Power, Gulf Power, and Mississippi Power

MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
Alabama Power Company 20172018 Annual Report



OVERVIEW
Business Activities
Alabama Power Company (the Company) operates as a vertically integrated utility providing electric service to retail and wholesale customers within its traditional service territory located in the State of Alabama in addition to wholesale customers in the Southeast.
Many factors affect the opportunities, challenges, and risks of the Company'sAlabama Power's business of providing electric service. These factors include the ability to maintain a constructive regulatory environment, to maintain and grow energy sales and customers, and to effectively manage and secure timely recovery of costs. These costs include those related to projected long-term demand growth, stringent environmental standards, including CCR rules, reliability, fuel, capital expenditures, including improving the electric transmission and distribution systems, and restoration following major storms. The CompanyAlabama Power has various regulatory mechanisms that operate to address cost recovery. Effectively operating pursuant to these regulatory mechanisms and appropriately balancing required costs and capital expenditures with customer prices will continue to challenge the CompanyAlabama Power for the foreseeable future. On May 1, 2018, the Alabama PSC approved modifications to Rate RSE and other commitments designed to position Alabama Power to address the retail rate impact and the growing pressure on its credit quality resulting from the Tax Reform Legislation. See FUTURE EARNINGS POTENTIAL – "Retail Regulatory Matters" and FINANCIAL CONDITION AND LIQUIDITY – "Credit Rating Risk" herein for additional information.
The CompanyAlabama Power continues to focus on several key performance indicators including, but not limited to, customer satisfaction, plant availability, system reliability, and net income after dividends on preferred and preference stock. The Company'sAlabama Power's financial success is directly tied to customer satisfaction. Key elements of ensuring customer satisfaction include outstanding service, high reliability, and competitive prices. Management uses customer satisfaction surveys to evaluate the Company'sAlabama Power's results and generally targets the top quartile of these surveys in measuring performance.
See RESULTS OF OPERATIONS herein for information on the Company'sAlabama Power's financial performance.
Earnings
Alabama Power's 2018 net income after dividends on preferred and preference stock was $930 million, representing an $82 million, or 9.7%, increase over the previous year. The Company'sincrease was primarily due to a decrease in income tax expense, partially offset by a decrease in retail revenues associated with customer bill credits related to the Tax Reform Legislation. The increase also reflects an increase in revenues associated with colder weather in the first quarter 2018 and warmer weather in the second and third quarters 2018 compared to the corresponding periods in 2017, partially offset by an accrual for a Rate RSE refund. See FUTURE EARNINGS POTENTIAL – "Retail Regulatory Matters – Rate RSE" herein for additional information.
Alabama Power's 2017 net income after dividends on preferred and preference stock was $848 million, representing a $26 million, or 3.2%, increase over the previous year. The increase was primarily due to an increase in rates under Rate RSE effective in January 2017 and the impact of a Rate RSE refund recorded in 2016. These increases to income were partially offset by a decrease in retail revenues associated with milder weather, lower customer usage, and an increase in non-fuel operations and maintenance expenses in 2017 as compared to 2016. See FUTURE EARNINGS POTENTIAL – "Retail Regulatory Matters – Rate RSE" herein for additional information.
The Company's 2016 net income after dividends on preferred and preference stock was $822 million, representing a $37 million, or 4.7%, increase over the previous year. The increase was due primarily to an increase in retail revenues under Rate CNP Compliance, an increase in weather-related revenues, and a decrease in operations and maintenance expenses not related to fuel or Rate CNP Compliance. These increases to income were partially offset by an accrual for a Rate RSE refund, a decrease in AFUDC equity, and an increase in depreciation.
    Table of Contents                                Index to Financial Statements

MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS (continued)
Alabama Power Company 20172018 Annual Report

RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
A condensed income statement for the CompanyAlabama Power follows:
Amount 
Increase (Decrease)
from Prior Year
Amount 
Increase (Decrease)
from Prior Year
2017 2017 20162018 2018 2017
(in millions)(in millions)
Operating revenues$6,039
 $150
 $121
$6,032
 $(7) $150
Fuel1,225
 (72) (45)1,301
 76
 (72)
Purchased power328
 (6) (17)432
 104
 (6)
Other operations and maintenance1,652
 142
 9
1,669
 (40) 152
Depreciation and amortization736
 33
 60
764
 28
 33
Taxes other than income taxes384
 4
 12
389
 5
 4
Total operating expenses4,325
 101
 19
4,555
 173
 111
Operating income1,714
 49
 102
1,477
 (180) 39
Allowance for equity funds used during construction39
 11
 (32)62
 23
 11
Interest expense, net of amounts capitalized305
 3
 28
323
 18
 3
Other income (expense), net(14) 7
 11
20
 (23) 17
Income taxes568
 37
 25
291
 (277) 37
Net income866
 27
 28
945
 79
 27
Dividends on preferred and preference stock18
 1
 (9)15
 (3) 1
Net income after dividends on preferred and preference stock$848
 $26
 $37
$930
 $82
 $26
Operating Revenues
Operating revenues for 20172018 were $6.0 billion, reflecting a $150$7 million increasedecrease from 2016.2017. Details of operating revenues were as follows:
Amount
2017 20162018 2017
(in millions)(in millions)
Retail — prior year$5,322
 $5,234
$5,458
 $5,322
Estimated change resulting from —      
Rates and pricing362
 147
(354) 362
Sales decline(44) (20)(10) (44)
Weather(89) 31
137
 (89)
Fuel and other cost recovery(93) (70)136
 (93)
Retail — current year5,458
 5,322
5,367
 5,458
Wholesale revenues —      
Non-affiliates276
 283
279
 276
Affiliates97
 69
119
 97
Total wholesale revenues373
 352
398
 373
Other operating revenues208
 215
267
 208
Total operating revenues$6,039
 $5,889
$6,032
 $6,039
Percent change2.6% 2.1%(0.1)% 2.6%
Retail revenues in 2018 were $5.4 billion. These revenues decreased $91 million, or 1.7%, in 2018 as compared to the prior year. The decrease in 2018 was primarily due to customer bill credits related to the Tax Reform Legislation and an accrual for a Rate RSE refund, partially offset by an increase in fuel revenues and colder weather in the first quarter and warmer weather in the second and third quarters 2018 as compared to the corresponding periods in 2017.

MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS (continued)
Alabama Power Company 2018 Annual Report

Retail revenues in 2017 were $5.5 billion. These revenues increased $136 million, or 2.6%, in 2017 and $88 million, or 1.7%, in 2016, each as compared to the prior year. The increase in 2017 was primarily due to an increase in rates under Rate RSE effective in January 2017, partially offset by a decrease in fuel revenues and milder weather in the first and third quarters 2017

MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS (continued)
Alabama Power Company 2017 Annual Report

as compared to the corresponding periods in 2016. The increase in 2016 was due to an increase in revenues under Rate CNP Compliance as a result of increased net investments, partially offset by a decrease in fuel revenues and an accrual for a Rate RSE refund.
See Note 32 to the financial statements under "Retail Regulatory Matters"Alabama Power – Rate RSE" for additional information. See "Energy Sales" herein for a discussion of changes in the volume of energy sold, including changes related to sales decline and weather.
FuelElectric rates billedinclude provisions to customers are designed to fully recover fluctuatingrecognize the recovery of fuel andcosts, purchased power costs, over a period of time. FuelPPAs certificated by the Alabama PSC, and costs associated with the natural disaster reserve. Under these provisions, fuel and other cost recovery revenues generally have no effect on net income because they represent the recording of revenues to offsetequal fuel and purchased power expenses.other cost recovery expenses and do not affect net income. See Note 3 to the financial statements underFUTURE EARNINGS POTENTIAL – "Retail Regulatory Matters – Rate ECR" herein for additional information.
Wholesale revenues from power sales to non-affiliated utilities were as follows:
2017 2016 20152018 2017 2016
(in millions)(in millions)
Capacity and other$154
 $154
 $140
$101
 $96
 $93
Energy122
 129
 101
178
 180
 190
Total non-affiliated$276
 $283
 $241
$279
 $276
 $283
Wholesale revenues from sales to non-affiliates will vary depending on fuel prices, the market prices of wholesale energy compared to the cost of the Company'sAlabama Power's and the Southern Company system's generation, demand for energy within the Southern Company system's electric service territory, and availability of the Southern Company system's generation. Increases and decreases in energy revenues that are driven by fuel prices are accompanied by an increase or decrease in fuel costs and do not affect net income. Short-term opportunity energy sales are also included in wholesale energy sales to non-affiliates. These opportunity sales are made at market-based rates that generally provide a margin above the Company'sAlabama Power's variable cost to produce the energy.
In 2018, wholesale revenues from sales to non-affiliates increased $3 million, or 1.1%, as compared to the prior year. In 2017, wholesale revenues from sales to non-affiliates decreased $7 million, or 2.5%, as compared to the prior year. In 2016, wholesale revenues from sales to non-affiliates increased $42 million, or 17.4%, as compared to the prior year primarily due to a $28 million increase in revenues from energy sales and a $14 million increase in capacity revenues. In 2016, KWH sales increased 33.3% primarily due to a new contract that became effective in the first quarter 2016 partially offset by a 12.1% decrease in the price of energy due to lower natural gas prices.
Wholesale revenues from sales to affiliated companies will vary depending on demand and the availability and cost of generating resources at each company. These affiliate sales and purchases are made in accordance with the Intercompany Interchange Contract (IIC),IIC, as approved by the FERC. These transactions do not have a significant impact on earnings since this energy is generally sold at marginal cost and energy purchases are generally offset by energy revenues through the Company'sAlabama Power's energy cost recovery clause.
In 2018, wholesale revenues from sales to affiliates increased $22 million, or 22.7%, as compared to the prior year. In 2018, the price of energy increased 12.3% as a result of higher natural gas prices and KWH sales increased 10.0% primarily due to an increase in hydro generation. In 2017, wholesale revenues from sales to affiliates increased $28 million, or 40.6%, as compared to the prior year. In 2017, KWH sales increased 31.1% as a result of supporting Southern Company system transmission reliability and a 6.9% increase in the price of energy primarily due to higher natural gas prices.
In 2016, wholesale2018, other operating revenues from sales to affiliates decreased $15increased $59 million, or 17.9%28.4%, as compared to the prior year. In 2016, KWHyear primarily due to revenues related to unregulated sales decreased 15.7%of products and services that were reclassified as other revenues as a result of lower-cost generation availablethe adoption of ASC 606, Revenue from Contracts with Customers (ASC 606). In prior periods, these revenues were included in other income (expense), net. See Note 1 to the Southern Company system and a 2.6% decreasefinancial statements for additional information regarding Alabama Power's adoption of ASC 606. This increase was partially offset by decreases in the price of energyopen access transmission tariff revenues primarily due to a lower natural gas prices.rate related to the Tax Reform Legislation.
    Table of Contents                                Index to Financial Statements

MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS (continued)
Alabama Power Company 20172018 Annual Report

Energy Sales
Changes in revenues are influenced heavily by the change in the volume of energy sold from year to year. KWH sales for 20172018 and the percent change from the prior year were as follows:
Total
KWHs
 
Total KWH
Percent Change
 
Weather-Adjusted
Percent Change
Total
KWHs
 
Total KWH
Percent Change
 
Weather-Adjusted
Percent Change
2017 2017 2016 2017 20162018 2018 2017 2018 2017
(in billions)        (in billions)        
Residential17.2
 (6.1)% 1.4% (1.2)% (0.5)%18.6
 8.2% (6.1)% (0.4)% (1.2)%
Commercial13.6
 (3.4) (0.1) (1.3) (0.5)13.9
 1.9
 (3.4) (1.0) (1.3)
Industrial22.7
 1.7
 (4.6) 1.7
 (4.6)23.0
 1.4
 1.7
 1.4
 1.7
Other0.2
 (5.0) 3.8
 (5.0) 3.8
0.2
 (5.7) (5.0) (5.7) (5.0)
Total retail53.7
 (2.3) (1.5) (0.1)% (2.2)%55.7
 3.7
 (2.3) 0.2 % (0.1)%
Wholesale                  
Non-affiliates5.5
 (6.5) 37.1
    5.0
 (8.7) (6.5)    
Affiliates4.2
 31.1
 (15.7)    4.6
 9.6
 31.1
    
Total wholesale9.7
 6.6
 12.5
    9.6
 (0.9) 6.6
    
Total energy sales63.4
 (1.0)% 0.3%    65.3
 3.0% (1.0)%    
Changes in retail energy sales are generally the result of changes in electricity usage by customers, changes in weather, and changes in the number of customers. Retail energy sales in 2018 were 3.7% higher than in 2017. Residential sales and commercial sales increased 8.2% and 1.9% in 2018, respectively, primarily due to colder weather in the first quarter and warmer weather in the second and third quarters 2018 as compared to the corresponding periods in 2017. Weather-adjusted residential sales were 0.4% lower in 2018 primarily due to lower customer usage resulting from an increase in penetration of energy-efficient residential appliances. Weather-adjusted commercial sales were 1.0% lower in 2018 primarily due to lower customer usage resulting from customer initiatives in energy savings and an ongoing migration to the electronic commerce business model. Industrial sales increased 1.4% in 2018 as compared to 2017 as a result of an increase in demand resulting from changes in production levels primarily in the primary metals, pipelines, and mining sectors offset by the paper sector.
Retail energy sales in 2017 were 2.3% lower than in 2016. Residential sales and commercial sales decreased 6.1% and 3.4% in 2017, respectively, primarily due to milder weather in the first and third quarters 2017 as compared to the corresponding periods in 2016. Weather-adjusted residential sales were 1.2% lower in 2017 primarily due to lower customer usage resulting from an increase in penetration of energy-efficient residential appliances, partially offset by customer growth. Weather-adjusted commercial sales were 1.3% lower in 2017 primarily due to lower customer usage resulting from customer initiatives in energy savings and an ongoing migration to the electronic commerce business model, partially offset by customer growth. Industrial sales increased 1.7% in 2017 as compared to 2016 as a result of an increase in demand resulting from changes in production levels primarily in the primary metals, chemicals, and mining sectors offset by the pipelines and paper sectors.
Retail energy sales in 2016 were 1.5% lower than in 2015. Residential sales increased 1.4% primarily due to warmer weather in the third quarter 2016 as compared to the corresponding period in 2015. Commercial sales remained flat in 2016. Weather-adjusted residential sales were flat in 2016 due to lower customer usage primarily resulting from an increase in efficiency improvements in residential appliances and lighting, partially offset by customer growth. Industrial sales decreased 4.6% in 2016 compared to 2015 as a result of a decrease in demand resulting from changes in production levels primarily in the primary metals, chemical, pipelines, paper, and stone, clay, and glass sectors. A strong dollar, low oil prices, and weak global growth conditions constrained growth in the industrial sector in 2016.
See "Operating Revenues" above for a discussion of significant changes in wholesale revenues from sales to non-affiliates and wholesale revenues from sales to affiliated companies as related to changes in price and KWH sales.
Fuel and Purchased Power Expenses
Fuel costs constitute one of the largest expenses for the Company. The mix of fuel sources for generation of electricity is determined primarily by the unit cost of fuel consumed, demand, and the availability of generating units. Additionally, the CompanyAlabama Power purchases a portion of its electricity needs from the wholesale market.
    Table of Contents                                Index to Financial Statements

MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS (continued)
Alabama Power Company 20172018 Annual Report

Details of the Company'sAlabama Power's generation and purchased power were as follows:
2017 2016 20152018 2017 2016
Total generation (in billions of KWHs)
60.3
 60.2
 60.9
60.5
 60.3
 60.2
Total purchased power (in billions of KWHs)
6.4
 7.1
 6.3
8.1
 6.4
 7.1
Sources of generation (percent)
          
Coal50
 53
 54
50
 50
 53
Nuclear24
 23
 24
23
 24
 23
Gas20
 19
 16
19
 20
 19
Hydro6
 5
 6
8
 6
 5
Cost of fuel, generated (in cents per net KWH)
          
Coal2.60
 2.75
 2.83
2.73
 2.60
 2.75
Nuclear0.75
 0.78
 0.81
0.77
 0.75
 0.78
Gas2.72
 2.67
 2.94
2.84
 2.72
 2.67
Average cost of fuel, generated (in cents per net KWH)(a)(b)
2.14
 2.26
 2.34
2.26
 2.14
 2.26
Average cost of purchased power (in cents per net KWH)(b)(c)
5.29
 4.80
 5.66
5.47
 5.29
 4.80
(a)For 2018, cost of fuel, generated and average cost of fuel, generated excludes a $30 million adjustment associated with a May 2018 Alabama PSC accounting order related to excess deferred income taxes. See FUTURE EARNINGS POTENTIAL – "Retail Regulatory Matters – Tax Reform Accounting Order" herein for additional information.
(b)KWHs generated by hydro are excluded from the average cost of fuel, generated.
(b)(c)Average cost of purchased power includes fuel, energy, and transmission purchased by the CompanyAlabama Power for tolling agreements where power is generated by the provider.
Fuel and purchased power expenses were $1.73 billion in 2018, an increase of $180 million, or 11.6%, compared to 2017. The increase was primarily due to an $81 million net increase related to the volume of KWHs purchased and generated, a $54 million increase in the average cost of fuel, and a $15 million increase in the average cost of purchased power.
In addition, fuel expense increased $30 million in 2018 as a result of an Alabama PSC accounting order authorizing the amortization of a regulatory liability to offset under recovered fuel costs. See FUTURE EARNINGS POTENTIAL – "Retail Regulatory Matters – Tax Reform Accounting Order" herein for additional information.
Fuel and purchased power expenses were $1.55 billion in 2017, a decrease of $78 million, or 4.8%, compared to 2016. The decrease was primarily due to a $67 million net decrease related to the volume of KWHs generated and purchased and a $42 million decrease in the average cost of fuel, partially offset by a $31 million increase in the average cost of purchased power.
Fuel and purchased power expenses were $1.63 billion in 2016, a decrease of $62 million, or 3.7%, compared to 2015. The decrease was primarily due to a $61 million decrease in the average cost of purchased power, and a $59 million decrease in the average cost of fuel, partially offset by a $49 million increase related to the volume of KWHs purchased.
Fuel and purchased power energy transactions do not have a significant impact on earnings, since energy expenses are generally offset by energy revenues through the Company'sAlabama Power's energy cost recovery clause. The Company,Alabama Power, along with the Alabama PSC, continuously monitors the under/over recovered balance to determine whether adjustments to billing rates are required. See Note 32 to the financial statements under "Retail Regulatory Matters"Alabama Power – Rate ECR" for additional information.
Energy purchases from non-affiliates will vary depending on the market pricesFuel
Fuel expenses were $1.3 billion in 2018, an increase of wholesale energy as$76 million, or 6.2%, compared to 2017. The increase was primarily due to a 5.0% increase in the average cost of KWHs generated by coal and a 4.4% increase in the Southern Company system's generation, demand for energy withinaverage cost of KWHs generated by natural gas, which excludes tolling agreements. These increases were partially offset by a 28.3% increase in the Southern Company system's electric service territory,volume of KWHs generated by hydro and a 2.1% decrease in the availabilityvolume of the Southern Company system's generation.
Fuel
KWHs generated by natural gas. Fuel expenses were $1.2 billion in 2017, a decrease of $72 million, or 5.6%, compared to 2016. The decrease was primarily due to a 12.2% increase in the volume of KWHs generated by hydro, a 5.8% decrease in the volume of KWHs generated by coal, and a 5.5% and 3.9% decrease in the average cost of KWHs generated by coal and nuclear fuel, respectively. These decreases were partially offset by an 8.1% increase in the volume of KWHs generated by nuclear fuel and a 4.0% increase in the volume of KWHs generated by natural gas. Fuel expenses were $1.3 billion
In addition, fuel expense increased $30 million in 2016,2018 as a decreaseresult of $45an Alabama PSC accounting order authorizing the amortization of a regulatory liability to offset under recovered fuel costs. See FUTURE EARNINGS POTENTIAL – "Retail Regulatory Matters – Tax Reform Accounting Order" herein for additional information.

MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS (continued)
Alabama Power Company 2018 Annual Report

Purchased Power Non-Affiliates
Purchased power expense from non-affiliates was $216 million in 2018, an increase of $46 million, or 3.4%27.1%, compared to 2015. The decrease2017. This increase was primarily due to an 18.9% increase in the amount of energy purchased due to colder weather in the first quarter and warmer weather in the second and third quarters 2018 as compared to the corresponding periods in 2017 and a 9.2% decrease6.6% increase in the average cost of KWHs generated byper KWH purchased due to higher natural gas which excludes tolling agreements, a 4.2% and 3.9% decreaseprices. Purchased power expense from non-affiliates was $170 million in 2017, an increase of $4 million, or 2.4%, compared to 2016.
Energy purchases from non-affiliates will vary depending on the volumemarket prices of KWHs generated by nuclear fuel and coal, respectively, and a 3.7% decrease inwholesale energy as compared to the average cost of KWHs generated by nuclear fuel, partially offset by a 17.4% increase in the volumeSouthern Company system's generation, demand for energy within the Southern Company system's service territory, and the availability of KWHs generated by natural gas.the Southern Company system's generation.
Purchased Power Affiliates
Purchased power expense from affiliates was $216 million in 2018, an increase of $58 million, or 36.7%, compared to 2017. This increase was primarily due to a 34.5% increase in the amount of energy purchased due to colder weather in the first quarter and warmer weather in the second and third quarters 2018 as compared to the corresponding periods in 2017 and a 1.4% increase in the average cost per KWH purchased due to higher natural gas prices. Purchased power expense from affiliates was $158 million in 2017, a decrease of $10 million, or 6.0%, compared to 2016. This decrease was primarily due to a 17.2% decrease in the amount of energy purchased due to milder weather partially offset by a 13.9% increase in the average cost per KWH purchased due to higher natural gas prices. Purchased power expense from affiliates was $168 million in 2016, a decrease of $12 million, or 6.7%, compared to 2015. This decrease was primarily due to a

MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS (continued)
Alabama Power Company 2017 Annual Report

20.7% decrease in the average cost per KWH purchased due to lower natural gas prices, partially offset by a 17.5% increase in the amount of energy purchased due to the availability of lower-cost generation compared to the Company's owned generation.
Energy purchases from affiliates will vary depending on demand for energy and the availability and cost of generating resources at each company within the Southern Company system. These purchases are made in accordance with the IIC or other contractual agreements, as approved by the FERC.
Other Operations and Maintenance Expenses
In 2018, other operations and maintenance expenses decreased $40 million, or 2.3%, as compared to the prior year. Generation costs decreased $34 million primarily due to fewer outages resulting in lower costs. Employee benefit costs, including pension costs, decreased $26 million primarily due to lower active medical costs. Customer service costs decreased $10 million primarily due to cost-saving initiatives. These decreases were partially offset by a $47 million increase in expenses from unregulated sales of products and services that were reclassified as other operations and maintenance expenses as a result of the adoption of ASC 606. In prior periods, these expenses were included in other income (expense), net. See Note 1 to the financial statements under "Revenue" for additional information.
In 2017, other operations and maintenance expenses increased $142$152 million, or 9.4%9.8%, as compared to the prior year. Distribution and transmission expenses increased $58 million primarily due to vegetation management expenses. Generation costs increased $38 million primarily due to outage costs. Employee benefit costs, including pension costs, increased $22$32 million.
In 2016, other operations and maintenance expenses increased $9 million, or 0.6%, as compared to the prior year. Steam production costs increased $28 million primarily due to the timing of generation operating expenses. Transmission and distribution expenses increased $10 million and $7 million, respectively, primarily due to additional vegetation management and other maintenance expenses. These increases were partially offset by a decrease of $32 million in employee benefit costs, including pension costs. The increases in operations and maintenance expenses were primarily Rate CNP compliance-related costs and therefore had no significant impact to net income. See FUTURE EARNINGS POTENTIAL – "Retail Regulatory Matters – Rate CNP Compliance" herein for additional information.
See Note 211 to the financial statements under "Pension Plans" for additional information.
Depreciation and Amortization
Depreciation and amortization increased $28 million, or 3.8%, in 2018 as compared to the prior year primarily due to additional plant in service related to distribution, transmission, compliance-related steam, and other generation production projects. Depreciation and amortization increased $33 million, or 4.7%, in 2017 as compared to the prior year primarily due to additional plant in service and an increase in generation-related depreciation rates, effective January 1, 2017, associated with compliance-related steam projects and ARO recovery, partially offset by a decrease in distribution-related depreciation rates. See Note 15 to the financial statements under "Depreciation and Amortization" for additional information. Depreciation and amortization
Allowance for Equity Funds Used During Construction
AFUDC equity increased $60$23 million, or 9.3%59.0%, in 2016 as compared to the prior year primarily due to compliance-related steam projects placed in service.
Taxes Other Than Income Taxes
Taxes other than income taxes increased $4 million, or 1.1%, in 2017 as compared to the prior year. In 2016, taxes other than income taxes increased $12 million, or 3.3% in 20162018 as compared to the prior year. The increase was primarily due to increases in stateassociated with steam and municipal utility license tax bases primarily due to an increase in retail revenues. In addition, ad valorem taxes increased primarily due to an increase in assessed value of property.
Allowance for Equity Funds Used During Construction
transmission construction projects. AFUDC equity increased $11 million, or 39.3%, in 2017 as compared to the prior year. The increase was primarily associated with steam, transmission, and nuclear construction projects. AFUDC equity decreased $32 million, or 53.3%, in 2016 as compared to the prior year. The decrease was primarily associated with steam generation capital projects being placed in service. See Note 1 to financial statements under "Allowance for Funds Used During Construction" for additional information.
Interest Expense, Net of Amounts Capitalized
Interest expense, net of amounts capitalized increased $3$18 million, or 1.0%5.9%, in 2017 as compared to the prior year. Interest expense, net of amounts capitalized increased $28 million, or 10.2%, in 20162018 as compared to the prior year primarily due to an increase in debt outstanding and a reductionhigher interest rates, partially offset by an increase in the amounts capitalized. See FUTURE EARNINGS POTENTIAL – "Financing Activities" herein for additional information.
Other Income (Expense), Net
Other income (expense), net increased $7 million, or 33.3%, in 2017 as compared to the prior year primarily due to increases in unregulated lighting services. Other income (expense), net increased $11 million, or 34.4%, in 2016 as compared to the prior year primarily due to a decrease in donations, partially offset by a decrease in sales of non-utility property.Interest
    Table of Contents                                Index to Financial Statements

MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS (continued)
Alabama Power Company 20172018 Annual Report

expense, net of amounts capitalized increased $3 million, or 1.0%, in 2017 as compared to the prior year. See FUTURE EARNINGS POTENTIAL – "Financing Activities" herein for additional information.
Other Income (Expense), Net
Other income (expense), net decreased $23 million, or 53.5%, in 2018 as compared to the prior year primarily due to an increase in charitable donations and the reclassification of revenues and expenses associated with unregulated sales of products and services to other revenues and operations and maintenance expenses, respectively, as a result of the adoption of ASC 606. See Note 1 to the financial statements under "Revenue" for additional information. Other income (expense), net increased $17 million, or 65.4%, in 2017 as compared to the prior year primarily due to increases in unregulated lighting services and a decrease in the non-service cost components of net periodic pension and other postretirement benefits costs. See Note 1 to the financial statements under "Recently Adopted Accounting Standards" and Note 11 to the financial statements for additional information on net periodic pension and other postretirement benefit costs.
Income Taxes
Income taxes decreased $277 million, or 48.8%, in 2018 as compared to the prior year primarily due to the reduction in the federal income tax rate, the benefit from the flowback of excess deferred income taxes as a result of the Tax Reform Legislation, and lower pre-tax earnings. Income taxes increased $37 million, or 7.0%, in 2017 as compared to the prior year primarily due to higher pre-tax earnings, an increase inrelated to prior year tax return actualization, and an increase in income tax reserves, partially offset by an increase in state income tax credits. The impact to net income taxes as a result of the Tax Reform Legislation was not material due to the application of regulatory accounting. See FUTURE EARNINGS POTENTIAL – "Income Tax Matters – Federal Tax Reform Legislation" herein and Note 510 to the financial statements for additional information.
Effects of Inflation
Alabama Power is subject to rate regulation that is generally based on the recovery of historical and projected costs. The effects of inflation can create an economic loss since the recovery of costs could be in dollars that have less purchasing power. Any adverse effect of inflation on Alabama Power's results of operations has not been substantial in recent years. See Note 2 to the financial statements under "Alabama Power – Rate RSE" for additional information.
FUTURE EARNINGS POTENTIAL
General
Alabama Power operates as a vertically integrated utility providing electric service to retail and wholesale customers within its traditional service territory located in the State of Alabama and to wholesale customers in the Southeast. Prices for electric service provided by Alabama Power to retail customers are set by the Alabama PSC under cost-based regulatory principles. Retail rates and earnings are reviewed and may be adjusted periodically within certain limitations. Prices for wholesale electric service, interconnecting transmission lines, and the exchange of electric power are regulated by the FERC. See ACCOUNTING POLICIES – "Application of Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates – Utility Regulation" herein and Note 2 to the financial statements under "Alabama Power" for additional information about regulatory matters.
The results of operations for the past three years are not necessarily indicative of future earnings potential. The level of Alabama Power's future earnings depends on numerous factors that affect the opportunities, challenges, and risks of Alabama Power's primary business of providing electric service. These factors include Alabama Power's ability to maintain a constructive regulatory environment that continues to allow for the timely recovery of prudently-incurred costs during a time of increasing costs and the weak pace of growth in new customers and electricity use per customer, especially in residential and commercial markets. Earnings will also depend upon maintaining and growing sales, considering, among other things, the adoption and/or penetration rates of increasingly energy-efficient technologies and increasing volumes of electronic commerce transactions, both of which could contribute to a net reduction in customer usage. Earnings are subject to a variety of other factors. These factors include weather, competition, new energy contracts with other utilities, energy conservation practiced by customers, the use of alternative energy sources by customers, the price of electricity, the price elasticity of demand, and the rate of economic growth or decline in Alabama Power's service territory. Demand for electricity is primarily driven by the pace of economic growth that may be affected by changes in regional and global economic conditions, which may impact future earnings.

MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS (continued)
Alabama Power Company 2018 Annual Report

Environmental Matters
Alabama Power's operations are regulated by state and federal environmental agencies through a variety of laws and regulations governing air, water, land, and protection of other natural resources. Alabama Power maintains comprehensive environmental compliance and GHG strategies to assess upcoming requirements and compliance costs associated with these environmental laws and regulations. The costs, including capital expenditures, operations and maintenance costs, and costs reflected in ARO liabilities, required to comply with environmental laws and regulations and to achieve stated goals may impact future electric generating unit retirement and replacement decisions, results of operations, cash flows, and/or financial condition. Related costs may result from the installation of additional environmental controls, closure and monitoring of CCR facilities, unit retirements, or changing fuel sources for certain existing units, as well as related upgrades to Alabama Power's transmission and distribution systems. A major portion of these costs is expected to be recovered through existing ratemaking provisions. The ultimate impact of environmental laws and regulations and the GHG goals discussed herein will depend on various factors, such as state adoption and implementation of requirements, the availability and cost of any deployed technology, fuel prices, and the outcome of pending and/or future legal challenges.
New or revised environmental laws and regulations could affect many areas of Alabama Power's operations. The impact of any such changes cannot be determined at this time. Environmental compliance costs could affect earnings if such costs cannot continue to be recovered in rates on a timely basis. Environmental compliance costs are recovered through Rate CNP Compliance. See Note 2 to the financial statements under "Alabama Power – Rate CNP Compliance" for additional information. Further, increased costs that are recovered through regulated rates could contribute to reduced demand for electricity, which could negatively affect results of operations, cash flows, and/or financial condition. Additionally, many commercial and industrial customers may also be affected by existing and future environmental requirements, which for some may have the potential to ultimately affect their demand for electricity.
Through 2018, Alabama Power has invested approximately $5.4 billion in environmental capital retrofit projects to comply with environmental requirements, with annual totals of approximately $681 million, $491 million, and $260 million for 2018, 2017, and 2016, respectively. Although the timing, requirements, and estimated costs could change as environmental laws and regulations are adopted or modified, as compliance plans are revised or updated, and as legal challenges to rules are initiated or completed, Alabama Power's current compliance strategy estimates capital expenditures of $635 million from 2019 through 2023, with annual totals of approximately $226 million in 2019, $68 million in 2020, $118 million in 2021, $112 million in 2022, and $111 million in 2023. These estimates do not include any potential compliance costs associated with pending regulation of CO2 emissions from fossil fuel-fired electric generating units. See "Global Climate Issues" herein for additional information. Alabama Power also anticipates substantial expenditures associated with ash pond closure and ground water monitoring under the CCR Rule, which are reflected in Alabama Power's ARO liabilities. See FINANCIAL CONDITION AND LIQUIDITY – "Capital Requirements and Contractual Obligations" herein and Note 6 to the financial statements for additional information.
Environmental Laws and Regulations
Air Quality
The EPA has set National Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS) for six air pollutants (carbon monoxide, lead, nitrogen dioxide, ozone, particulate matter, and SO2) to protect and improve the nation's air quality, which it reviews and revises periodically. Following a NAAQS revision, states are required to develop an EPA-approved plan to protect air quality. These state plans can require additional emission controls, improvements in control efficiency, or fuel changes which can result in increased compliance and operational costs. NAAQS requirements can also adversely affect the siting of new electric generating facilities. No areas within Alabama Power's service territory are currently designated nonattainment for any NAAQS. If areas are designated as nonattainment in the future, increased compliance costs could result.
In 2011, the EPA finalized the Cross-State Air Pollution Rule (CSAPR) to address impacts of SO2 and NOX emissions from fossil fuel-fired electric generating plants. CSAPR establishes emissions trading programs and budgets for certain states and allocates emissions allowances for sources in those states. In 2016, the EPA published a final rule establishing more stringent ozone season NOX emissions budgets in Alabama. Increases in either future fossil fuel-fired generation or the availability or cost of CSAPR allowances could have a negative financial impact on results of operations for Alabama Power.
The EPA finalized regional haze regulations in 2005 and 2017. These regulations require states, tribal governments, and various federal agencies to develop and implement plans to reduce pollutants that impair visibility and demonstrate reasonable progress toward the goal of restoring natural visibility conditions in certain areas, including national parks and wilderness areas. States must submit a revised state implementation plan (SIP) to the EPA demonstrating continued reasonable progress towards achieving visibility improvement goals. The EPA approved the regional progress SIP for the State of Alabama.

MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS (continued)
Alabama Power Company 2018 Annual Report

Water Quality
In 2014, the EPA finalized requirements under Section 316(b) of the Clean Water Act (CWA) to regulate cooling water intake structures (CWIS) to minimize their effects on fish and other aquatic life at existing power plants (e.g. coal, natural gas, oil, and nuclear generating plants) and manufacturing facilities. The regulation requires plant-specific studies to determine applicable CWIS changes to protect organisms that either get caught on the intake screens (impingement) or are drawn into the cooling system (entrainment). Alabama Power is conducting these studies and currently anticipates applicable CWIS changes may include fish-friendly CWIS screens with fish return systems and minor additions of monitoring equipment at certain plants. However, the ultimate impact of this rule will depend on the outcome of these plant-specific studies, any additional protective measures required to be incorporated into each plant's National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit based on site-specific factors, and the outcome of any legal challenges.
In 2015, the EPA finalized the steam electric effluent limitations guidelines (ELG) rule (2015 ELG Rule) that set national standards for wastewater discharges from new and existing steam electric generating units generating greater than 50 MWs. The 2015 ELG Rule prohibits effluent discharges of certain waste streams and imposes stringent limits on flue gas desulfurization (scrubber) wastewater discharges. The revised technology-based limits and the CCR Rule require extensive changes to existing ash and wastewater management systems or the installation and operation of new ash and wastewater management systems. Compliance with the 2015 ELG Rule is expected to require capital expenditures and increased operational costs primarily for Alabama Power's coal-fired electric generation. State environmental agencies will incorporate specific compliance applicability dates in the NPDES permitting process for each ELG waste stream no later than December 31, 2023. The EPA is scheduled to issue a new rulemaking by December 2019 that could revise the limitations and applicability dates of two of the waste streams regulated in the 2015 ELG Rule. The impact of any changes to the 2015 ELG Rule will depend on the content of the new rule and the outcome of any legal challenges. Alabama Power does not anticipate that the unavailability of any units as a result of the ELG rule will have a material impact on Alabama Power's operations or financial condition.
In 2015, the EPA and the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (Corps) jointly published a final rule that revised the regulatory definition of waters of the United States (WOTUS) for all CWA programs. The rule significantly expanded the scope of federal jurisdiction over waterbodies (such as rivers, streams, canals, and wastewater treatment ponds), which could impact new generation projects and permitting and reporting requirements associated with the installation, expansion, and maintenance of transmission and distribution projects. The EPA and the Corps are expected to publish a final rule in 2019 to replace the 2015 WOTUS definition. The impact of any changes to the 2015 WOTUS rule will depend on the content of this final rule and the outcome of any legal challenges.
Coal Combustion Residuals
In 2015, the EPA finalized non-hazardous solid waste regulations for the disposal of CCR, including coal ash and gypsum, in landfills and surface impoundments (ash ponds) at active generating power plants. In addition to the EPA's CCR Rule, the State of Alabama has also finalized regulations regarding the handling of CCR that have been provided to the EPA for review. This state CCR rule is generally consistent with the federal CCR Rule. The EPA's CCR Rule requires landfills and ash ponds to be evaluated against a set of performance criteria and potentially closed if minimum criteria are not met. Closure of existing landfills and ash ponds could require installation of equipment and infrastructure to manage CCR in accordance with the CCR Rule. Based on cost estimates for closure in place and monitoring of ash ponds pursuant to the CCR Rule, Alabama Power recorded AROs for each CCR unit in 2015. As further analysis was performed and closure details were developed, Alabama Power has continued to periodically update these cost estimates, as discussed further below.
The EPA published certain amendments to the CCR Rule, which became effective August 29, 2018. These amendments extend the date from April 2019 to October 31, 2020 to cease sending CCR and other waste streams to ash ponds that demonstrate compliance with all except two of the specified performance criteria.
On August 21, 2018, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit issued a decision suggesting the EPA should regulate previously-excluded inactive ash ponds located at retired generation facilities and questioning both the ability of unlined ash ponds to continue operating no matter the performance criteria results and the classification of clay-lined landfills and ash ponds. These developments could impact the expected timing of Alabama Power's landfill and ash pond closure activities, but the extent of any impact will depend on the outcome of ongoing litigation, anticipated EPA rulemaking action to establish further guidance, and the outcome of any legal challenges.
In June 2018, Alabama Power recorded an increase of approximately $1.2 billion to its AROs related to the CCR Rule. The revised cost estimates were based on information from feasibility studies performed on ash ponds in use at plants operated by Alabama Power. During the second quarter 2018, Alabama Power's management completed its analysis of these studies which indicated that additional closure costs, primarily related to increases in estimated ash volume, water management requirements,

MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS (continued)
Alabama Power Company 2018 Annual Report

and design revisions, will be required to close these ash ponds under the planned closure-in-place methodology. As the level of work becomes more defined in the next 12 months, it is likely that these cost estimates will change and the change could be material.
Alabama Power expects to periodically update its ARO cost estimates. Absent continued recovery of ARO costs through regulated rates, Alabama Power's results of operations, cash flows, and financial condition could be materially impacted. See FINANCIAL CONDITION AND LIQUIDITY – "Capital Requirements and Contractual Obligations" herein and Note 6 to the financial statements for additional information.
The ultimate outcome of these matters cannot be determined at this time.
Nuclear Decommissioning
In June 2018, Alabama Power completed an updated decommissioning cost site study for Plant Farley. The estimated cost of decommissioning based on the study resulted in an increase in Alabama Power's ARO liability of approximately $300 million. Amounts previously contributed to Alabama Power's external trust funds are currently projected to be adequate to meet the updated decommissioning obligations. See Note 6 to the financial statements for additional information.
Global Climate Issues
On August 31, 2018, the EPA published a proposed rule known as the Affordable Clean Energy (ACE) Rule, which is intended to replace a regulation enacted in 2015 known as the Clean Power Plan (CPP), that would limit CO2 emissions from existing fossil fuel-fired electric generating units. The CPP has been stayed by the U.S. Supreme Court since 2016. The ACE Rule would require states to develop GHG unit-specific emission rate standards based on heat-rate efficiency improvements for existing fossil fuel-fired steam units. As proposed, combustion turbines, including natural gas combined cycles, are not affected sources. As of January 1, 2019, Alabama Power has ownership interests in 20 fossil fuel-fired steam units to which the proposed ACE Rule is applicable. The ultimate impact of this rule to Alabama Power is currently unknown and will depend on changes between the proposal and the final rule, subsequent state plan developments and requirements, and any associated legal challenges.
On December 20, 2018, the EPA published a proposed review of the Standards of Performance for Greenhouse Gas Emissions from New, Modified, and Reconstructed Stationary Sources: Electric Utility Generating Units final rule (2015 NSPS rule). The EPA's final 2015 NSPS rule set standards of performance for new, modified, and reconstructed electric utility generating units which included stationary combustion turbines and fossil-fired steam boilers. This proposal reduces the stringency of the 2015 NSPS rule by not basing the new and reconstructed fossil-fired steam boiler and IGCC standards on partial carbon capture and sequestration. The impact of any changes to this rule will depend on the content of the final rule and the outcome of any legal challenges.
The EPA's GHG reporting rule requires annual reporting of GHG emissions expressed in terms of metric tons of CO2 equivalent emissions for a company's operational control of facilities. Based on ownership or financial control of facilities, Alabama Power's 2017 GHG emissions were approximately 37 million metric tons of CO2 equivalent. The preliminary estimate of Alabama Power's 2018 GHG emissions on the same basis is approximately 36 million metric tons of CO2 equivalent.
Through 2017, the Southern Company system has achieved an estimated GHG emission reduction of 36% since 2007. In April 2018, Southern Company established an intermediate goal of a 50% reduction in carbon emissions from 2007 levels by 2030 and a long-term goal of low- to no-carbon operations by 2050. To achieve these goals, the Southern Company system expects to continue growing its renewable energy portfolio, optimize technology advancements to modernize its transmission and distribution systems, increase the use of natural gas for generation, complete ongoing construction projects, invest in energy efficiency, and continue research and development efforts focused on technologies to lower GHG emissions. The Southern Company system's ability to achieve these goals also will be dependent on many external factors, including supportive national energy policies, low natural gas prices, and the development, deployment, and advancement of relevant energy technologies.
FERC Matters
Open Access Transmission Tariff
On May 10, 2018, AMEA and Cooperative Energy filed with the FERC a complaint against SCS and the traditional electric operating companies (including Alabama Power) claiming that the current 11.25% base ROE used in calculating the annual transmission revenue requirements of the traditional electric operating companies' (including Alabama Power's) open access transmission tariff is unjust and unreasonable as measured by the applicable FERC standards. The complaint requested that the base ROE be set no higher than 8.65% and that the FERC order refunds for the difference in revenue requirements that results from applying a just and reasonable ROE established in this proceeding upon determining the current ROE is unjust and

MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS (continued)
Alabama Power Company 2018 Annual Report

unreasonable. On June 18, 2018, SCS and the traditional electric operating companies (including Alabama Power) filed their response challenging the adequacy of the showing presented by the complainants and offering support for the current ROE. On September 6, 2018, the FERC issued an order establishing a refund effective date of May 10, 2018 in the event a refund is due and initiating an investigation and settlement procedures regarding the current base ROE. Through December 31, 2018, the estimated maximum potential refund is not expected to be material to Alabama Power's results of operations or cash flows. The ultimate outcome of this matter cannot be determined at this time.
Retail Regulatory Matters
Alabama Power's revenues from regulated retail operations are collected through various rate mechanisms subject to the oversight of the Alabama PSC. Alabama Power currently recovers its costs from the regulated retail business primarily through Rate RSE, Rate CNP, Rate ECR, and Rate NDR. In addition, the Alabama PSC issues accounting orders to address current events impacting Alabama Power. See Note 2 to the financial statements under "Alabama Power" for additional information regarding Alabama Power's rate mechanisms and accounting orders.
Rate RSE
The Alabama PSC has adopted Rate RSE that provides for periodic annual adjustments based upon Alabama Power's projected weighted common equity return (WCER) compared to an allowable range. Rate RSE adjustments are based on forward-looking information for the applicable upcoming calendar year. Rate RSE adjustments for any two-year period, when averaged together, cannot exceed 4.0% and any annual adjustment is limited to 5.0%. When the projected WCER is under the allowed range, there is an adjusting point of 5.98% and eligibility for a performance-based adder of seven basis points, or 0.07%, to the WCER adjusting point if Alabama Power (i) has an "A" credit rating equivalent with at least one of the recognized rating agencies or (ii) is in the top one-third of a designated customer value benchmark survey. If Alabama Power's actual retail return is above the allowed WCER range, the excess will be refunded to customers unless otherwise directed by the Alabama PSC; however, there is no provision for additional customer billings should the actual retail return fall below the WCER range. Prior to January 2019, retail rates remained unchanged when the WCER range was between 5.75% and 6.21%.
On May 1, 2018, the Alabama PSC approved modifications to Rate RSE and other commitments designed to position Alabama Power to address the growing pressure on its credit quality resulting from the Tax Reform Legislation, without increasing retail rates under Rate RSE in the near term. Alabama Power plans to reduce growth in total debt by increasing equity, with corresponding reductions in debt issuances, thereby de-leveraging its capital structure. Alabama Power's goal is to achieve an equity ratio of approximately 55% by the end of 2025. At December 31, 2018, Alabama Power's equity ratio was approximately 47%.
The approved modifications to Rate RSE began for billings in January 2019. The modifications include reducing the top of the allowed WCER range from 6.21% to 6.15% and modifications to the refund mechanism applicable to prior year actual results. The modifications to the refund mechanism allow Alabama Power to retain a portion of the revenue that causes the actual WCER for a given year to exceed the allowed range.
Generally, if Alabama Power's actual WCER is between 6.15% and 7.65%, customers will receive 25% of the amount between 6.15% and 6.65%, 40% of the amount between 6.65% and 7.15%, and 75% of the amount between 7.15% and 7.65%. Customers will receive all amounts in excess of an actual WCER of 7.65%.
In conjunction with these modifications to Rate RSE, on May 8, 2018, Alabama Power consented to a moratorium on any upward adjustments under Rate RSE for 2019 and 2020 and will also return $50 million to customers through bill credits in 2019.
On November 30, 2018, Alabama Power made its required annual Rate RSE submission to the Alabama PSC of projected data for calendar year 2019. Projected earnings were within the specified range; therefore, retail rates under Rate RSE remain unchanged for 2019.
At December 31, 2018, Alabama Power's retail return exceeded the allowed WCER range, which resulted in Alabama Power establishing a regulatory liability of $109 million for Rate RSE refunds. In accordance with an Alabama PSC order issued on February 5, 2019, Alabama Power will apply $75 million to reduce the Rate ECR under recovered balance and the remaining $34 million will be refunded to customers through bill credits in July through September 2019.
Rate CNP PPA
Alabama Power's retail rates, approved by the Alabama PSC, provide for adjustments under Rate CNP to recognize the placing of new generating facilities into retail service. Alabama Power may also recover retail costs associated with certificated PPAs under

MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS (continued)
Alabama Power Company 2018 Annual Report

Rate CNP PPA. No adjustments to Rate CNP PPA occurred during the period 2016 through 2018 and no adjustment is expected in 2019.
In accordance with an accounting order issued in February 2017 by the Alabama PSC, Alabama Power reclassified $69 million of the December 31, 2016 Rate CNP PPA under recovered balance to a separate regulatory asset. The amortization of the new regulatory asset through Rate RSE will begin concurrently with the effective date of Alabama Power's next depreciation study, which is expected to occur no later than 2022.
Rate CNP Compliance
Rate CNP Compliance allows for the recovery of Alabama Power's retail costs associated with laws, regulations, and other such mandates directed at the utility industry involving the environment, security, reliability, safety, sustainability, or similar considerations impacting Alabama Power's facilities or operations. Rate CNP Compliance is based on forward-looking information and provides for the recovery of these costs pursuant to a factor that is calculated annually. Compliance costs to be recovered include operations and maintenance expenses, depreciation, and a return on certain invested capital. Revenues for Rate CNP Compliance, as recorded on the financial statements, are adjusted for differences in actual recoverable costs and amounts billed in current regulated rates. Accordingly, changes in the billing factor will have no significant effect on Alabama Power's revenues or net income, but will affect annual cash flow. Changes in Rate CNP Compliance-related operations and maintenance expenses and depreciation generally will have no effect on net income.
In accordance with an accounting order issued in February 2017 by the Alabama PSC, Alabama Power reclassified $36 million of its under recovered balance in Rate CNP Compliance to a separate regulatory asset. The amortization of the new regulatory asset through Rate RSE will begin concurrently with the effective date of Alabama Power's next depreciation study, which is expected to occur no later than 2022.
On November 30, 2018, Alabama Power submitted calculations associated with its cost of complying with environmental mandates, as provided under Rate CNP Compliance. The filing reflected a projected unrecovered retail revenue requirement for environmental compliance of approximately $205 million, which is being recovered in the billing months of January 2019 through December 2019.
Rate ECR
Alabama Power has established energy cost recovery rates under Alabama Power's Rate ECR as approved by the Alabama PSC. Rates are based on an estimate of future energy costs and the current over or under recovered balance. Revenues recognized under Rate ECR and recorded on the financial statements are adjusted for the difference in actual recoverable fuel costs and amounts billed in current regulated rates. The difference in the recoverable fuel costs and amounts billed give rise to the over or under recovered amounts recorded as regulatory assets or liabilities. Alabama Power, along with the Alabama PSC, continually monitors the over or under recovered cost balance to determine whether an adjustment to billing rates is required. Changes in the Rate ECR factor have no significant effect on Alabama Power's net income, but will impact operating cash flows. Currently, the Alabama PSC may approve billing rates under Rate ECR of up to 5.910 cents per KWH.
In accordance with an accounting order issued in February 2017 by the Alabama PSC, Alabama Power reclassified $36 million of its under recovered balance in Rate ECR to a separate regulatory asset. The amortization of the new regulatory asset through Rate RSE will begin concurrently with the effective date of Alabama Power's next depreciation study, which is expected to occur no later than 2022. Alabama Power's current depreciation study became effective January 1, 2017.
On May 1, 2018, the Alabama PSC approved an increase to Rate ECR from 2.015 cents per KWH to 2.353 cents per KWH effective July 2018 through December 2018. On December 4, 2018, the Alabama PSC issued a consent order to leave this rate in effect through December 31, 2019. This change is expected to increase collections by approximately $183 million in 2019. Absent any further order from the Alabama PSC, in January 2020, the rates will return to the originally authorized 5.910 cents per KWH.
As discussed herein under "Rate RSE," in accordance with an Alabama PSC order issued on February 5, 2019, Alabama Power will utilize $75 million of the 2018 Rate RSE refund liability to reduce the Rate ECR under recovered balance.
Tax Reform Accounting Order
On May 1, 2018, the Alabama PSC approved an accounting order that authorized Alabama Power to defer the benefits of federal excess deferred income taxes associated with the Tax Reform Legislation for the year ended December 31, 2018 as a regulatory liability and to use up to $30 million of such deferrals to offset under recovered amounts under Rate ECR. The estimated deferrals for the year ended December 31, 2018 totaled approximately $63 million, subject to adjustment following the filing of the 2018 tax return, of which $30 million was used to offset the Rate ECR under recovered balance and $33 million is recorded in other

MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS (continued)
Alabama Power Company 2018 Annual Report

regulatory liabilities, deferred on the balance sheet to be used for the benefit of customers as determined by the Alabama PSC at a future date. See Note 10 to the financial statements under "Current and Deferred Income Taxes" for additional information.
Software Accounting Order
On February 5, 2019, the Alabama PSC approved an accounting order that authorizes Alabama Power to establish a regulatory asset for operations and maintenance costs associated with software implementation projects. The regulatory asset will be amortized ratably over the life of the related software.
Plant Greene County
Alabama Power jointly owns Plant Greene County with an affiliate, Mississippi Power. See Note 5 to the financial statements under "Joint Ownership Agreements" for additional information regarding the joint ownership agreement. On August 6, 2018, Mississippi Power filed its proposed Reserve Margin Plan (RMP) with the Mississippi PSC, which proposes a four-year acceleration of the retirement of Plant Greene County Units 1 and 2 to the third quarter 2021 and the third quarter 2022, respectively. Mississippi Power's proposed Plant Greene County unit retirements would require the completion of proposed transmission and system reliability improvements, as well as agreement by Alabama Power. Alabama Power will continue to monitor the status of Mississippi Power's proposed RMP and associated regulatory process as well as the proposed transmission and system reliability improvements. Alabama Power will review all the facts and circumstances and will evaluate all its alternatives prior to reaching a final determination on the ongoing operations of Plant Greene County. The ultimate outcome of this matter cannot be determined at this time.
Request for Proposals for Future Generation
On September 21, 2018, Alabama Power issued a request for proposals of between 100 MWs and 1,200 MWs of capacity beginning no later than 2023. On November 9, 2018, bids were received and an evaluation of those bids is in progress. Any purchases will depend upon the cost competitiveness of the respective offers as well as other options available to Alabama Power. The ultimate outcome of this matter cannot be determined at this time.
Rate NDR
Based on an order from the Alabama PSC, Alabama Power maintains a reserve for operations and maintenance expenses to cover the cost of damages from major storms to its transmission and distribution facilities. The order approves a separate monthly Rate NDR charge to customers consisting of two components. The first component is intended to establish and maintain a reserve balance for future storms and is an on-going part of customer billing. When the reserve balance falls below $50 million, a reserve establishment charge will be activated (and the on-going reserve maintenance charge concurrently suspended) until the reserve balance reaches $75 million. In December 2017, the reserve maintenance charge was suspended and the reserve establishment charge was activated as a result of the NDR balance falling below $50 million. Alabama Power expects to collect approximately $16 million annually until the reserve balance is restored to $75 million. The NDR balance at December 31, 2018 was $20 million and is included in other regulatory liabilities, deferred on the balance sheet.
The second component of the Rate NDR charge is intended to allow recovery of any existing deferred storm-related operations and maintenance costs and any future reserve deficits over a 24-month period. The Alabama PSC order gives Alabama Power authority to record a deficit balance in the NDR when costs of storm damage exceed any established reserve balance. Absent further Alabama PSC approval, the maximum total Rate NDR charge consisting of both components is $10 per month per non-residential customer account and $5 per month per residential customer account. Alabama Power has the authority, based on an order from the Alabama PSC, to accrue certain additional amounts as circumstances warrant.
As revenue from the Rate NDR charge is recognized, an equal amount of operations and maintenance expenses related to the NDR will also be recognized. As a result, the Rate NDR charge will not have an effect on net income but will impact operating cash flows.
Environmental Accounting Order
Based on an order from the Alabama PSC (Environmental Accounting Order), Alabama Power is allowed to establish a regulatory asset to record the unrecovered investment costs, including the unrecovered plant asset balance and the unrecovered costs associated with site removal and closure associated with future unit retirements caused by environmental regulations. The regulatory asset is being amortized and recovered over the affected unit's remaining useful life, as established prior to the decision regarding early retirement through Rate CNP Compliance. At December 31, 2018, this regulatory asset had a balance of $42 million. See "Environmental Matters – Environmental Laws and Regulations" herein for additional information regarding environmental regulations.

MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS (continued)
Alabama Power Company 2018 Annual Report

Subsequent to December 31, 2018, Alabama Power determined that Plant Gorgas Units 8, 9, and 10 (approximately 1,000 MWs) will be retired by April 15, 2019 due to the expected costs of compliance with federal and state environmental regulations. In accordance with the Environmental Accounting Order, approximately $740 million of net investment costs will be transferred to a regulatory asset at the retirement date and recovered over the affected units' remaining useful lives, as established prior to the decision to retire.
Income Tax Matters
Federal Tax Reform Legislation
In December 2017, the Tax Reform Legislation was signed into law and became effective on January 1, 2018. The Tax Reform Legislation, among other things, reduced the federal corporate income tax rate to 21%, retained normalization provisions for public utility property and existing renewable energy incentives, and repealed the corporate alternative minimum tax. In addition, under the Tax Reform Legislation, net operating losses (NOLs) generated after December 31, 2017 can no longer be carried back to previous tax years but can be carried forward indefinitely, with utilization limited to 80% of taxable income of the subsequent tax year. The projected reduction of Southern Company's consolidated income tax liability resulting from the tax rate reduction also delays the expected utilization of existing tax credit carryforwards. See Note 10 to the financial statements for information on Southern Company's joint consolidated income tax allocation agreement.
Following the enactment of the Tax Reform Legislation, the SEC staff issued Staff Accounting Bulletin 118 – "Income Tax Accounting Implications of the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act" (SAB 118), which provided for a measurement period of up to one year from the enactment date to complete accounting under GAAP for the tax effects of the legislation. Due to the complex and comprehensive nature of the enacted tax law changes and their application under GAAP, Alabama Power considered all amounts recorded in the financial statements as a result of the Tax Reform Legislation "provisional" as discussed in SAB 118 and subject to revision prior to filing its 2017 tax return in the fourth quarter 2018. Alabama Power recognized tax expense of $3 million in 2017 as a result of the Tax Reform Legislation. In addition, in total, Alabama Power recorded a $281 million decrease in regulatory assets and a $2.0 billion increase in regulatory liabilities as a result of the Tax Reform Legislation. As of December 31, 2018, Alabama Power considered the measurement of impacts from the Tax Reform Legislation on deferred income tax assets and liabilities, primarily due to the impact of the reduction of the corporate income tax rate, to be complete.
However, the IRS continues to issue regulations that provide further interpretation and guidance on the law and each state's adoption of the provisions contained in the Tax Reform Legislation remains uncertain. The regulatory treatment of certain impacts of the Tax Reform Legislation is subject to the discretion of the FERC. The ultimate impact of this matter cannot be determined at this time. See Note 2 to the financial statements under "Alabama Power – Rate RSE" for additional information regarding modifications to Rate RSE to reflect the impacts of the Tax Reform Legislation. Also see FINANCIAL CONDITION AND LIQUIDITY – "Credit Rating Risk" herein and Note 10 to the financial statements under "Current and Deferred Income Taxes" for additional information.
Bonus Depreciation
Under the Tax Reform Legislation, projects with binding contracts prior to September 28, 2017 and placed in service after September 27, 2017 remain eligible for bonus depreciation under the PATH Act. The PATH Act allowed for 50% bonus depreciation for 2015 through 2017, 40% bonus depreciation for 2018, and 30% bonus depreciation for 2019 and certain long-lived assets placed in service in 2020. Based on provisional estimates, bonus depreciation is expected to result in positive cash flows of approximately $100 million for the 2018 tax year and approximately $30 million for the 2019 tax year. See Note 10 to the financial statements under "Current and Deferred Income Taxes" for additional information. The ultimate outcome of this matter cannot be determined at this time.
Other Matters
Alabama Power is involved in various other matters being litigated and regulatory matters that could affect future earnings. In addition, Alabama Power is subject to certain claims and legal actions arising in the ordinary course of business. Alabama Power's business activities are subject to extensive governmental regulation related to public health and the environment, such as laws and regulations governing air, water, land, and protection of other natural resources. Litigation over environmental issues and claims of various types, including property damage, personal injury, common law nuisance, and citizen enforcement of environmental laws and regulations, has occurred throughout the U.S. This litigation has included claims for damages alleged to have been caused by CO2 and other emissions, CCR, and alleged exposure to hazardous materials, and/or requests for injunctive relief in connection with such matters.

MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS (continued)
Alabama Power Company 2018 Annual Report

The ultimate outcome of such pending or potential litigation or regulatory matters cannot be predicted at this time; however, for current proceedings not specifically reported herein or in Notes 2 and 3 to the financial statements, management does not anticipate that the ultimate liabilities, if any, arising from such current proceedings would have a material effect on Alabama Power's financial statements. See Notes 2 and 3 to the financial statements for a discussion of various other contingencies, regulatory matters, and other matters being litigated which may affect future earnings potential.
ACCOUNTING POLICIES
Application of Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates
Alabama Power prepares its financial statements in accordance with GAAP. Significant accounting policies are described in Notes 1, 5, and 6 to the financial statements. In the application of these policies, certain estimates are made that may have a material impact on Alabama Power's results of operations and related disclosures. Different assumptions and measurements could produce estimates that are significantly different from those recorded in the financial statements. Senior management has reviewed and discussed the following critical accounting policies and estimates with the Audit Committee of Southern Company's Board of Directors.
Utility Regulation
Alabama Power is subject to retail regulation by the Alabama PSC and wholesale regulation by the FERC. As a result, Alabama Power applies accounting standards which require the financial statements to reflect the effects of rate regulation. Through the ratemaking process, the regulators may require the inclusion of costs or revenues in periods different than when they would be recognized by a non-regulated company. This treatment may result in the deferral of expenses and the recording of related regulatory assets based on anticipated future recovery through rates or the deferral of gains or creation of liabilities and the recording of related regulatory liabilities. The application of the accounting standards has a further effect on Alabama Power's financial statements as a result of the estimates of allowable costs used in the ratemaking process. These estimates may differ from those actually incurred by Alabama Power; therefore, the accounting estimates inherent in specific costs such as depreciation, AROs, and pension and other postretirement benefits have less of a direct impact on Alabama Power's results of operations and financial condition than they would on a non-regulated company.
As reflected in Note 2 to the financial statements under "Alabama PowerRegulatory Assets and Liabilities," significant regulatory assets and liabilities have been recorded. Management reviews the ultimate recoverability of these regulatory assets and any requirement to refund these regulatory liabilities based on applicable regulatory guidelines and GAAP. However, adverse legislative, judicial, or regulatory actions could materially impact the amounts of such regulatory assets and liabilities and could adversely impact Alabama Power's financial statements.
Asset Retirement Obligations
AROs are computed as the fair value of the estimated costs for an asset's future retirement and are recorded in the period in which the liability is incurred. The estimated costs are capitalized as part of the related long-lived asset and depreciated over the asset's useful life. In the absence of quoted market prices, AROs are estimated using present value techniques in which estimates of future cash outlays associated with the asset retirements are discounted using a credit-adjusted risk-free rate. Estimates of the timing and amounts of future cash outlays are based on projections of when and how the assets will be retired and the cost of future removal activities.
The liability for AROs primarily relates to the decommissioning of Alabama Power's nuclear facility, Plant Farley, and facilities that are subject to the CCR Rule and the related state rule, principally ash ponds. In addition, Alabama Power has AROs related to various landfill sites, underground storage tanks, asbestos removal related to ongoing repair and maintenance, disposal of polychlorinated biphenyls in certain transformers, and disposal of sulfur hexafluoride gas in certain substation breakers.
Alabama Power also has identified retirement obligations related to certain transmission and distribution facilities, asbestos containing material within long-term assets not subject to ongoing repair and maintenance activities, and certain wireless communication towers. However, liabilities for the removal of these assets have not been recorded because the settlement timing for the retirement obligations related to these assets is indeterminable and, therefore, the fair value of the retirement obligations cannot be reasonably estimated. A liability for these retirement obligations will be recognized when sufficient information becomes available to support a reasonable estimation of the retirement obligation.
The cost estimates for AROs related to the disposal of CCR are based on information using various assumptions related to closure and post-closure costs, timing of future cash outlays, inflation and discount rates, and the potential methods for complying with the CCR Rule requirements for closure in place. In June 2018, Alabama Power recorded increases of approximately $1.2 billion

MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS (continued)
Alabama Power Company 2018 Annual Report

to its AROs related to the CCR Rule and approximately $300 million to its AROs related to updated nuclear decommissioning cost site studies. The revised CCR-related cost estimates as of June 30, 2018 were based on information from feasibility studies performed on ash ponds in use at the plants Alabama Power operates. During the second quarter 2018, Alabama Power's management completed its analysis of these studies which indicated that additional closure costs, primarily related to increases in estimated ash volume, water management requirements, and design revisions, will be required to close these ash ponds under the planned closure-in-place methodology. As the level of work becomes more defined in the next 12 months, it is likely that these cost estimates will change and the change could be material. Alabama Power expects to periodically update its ARO cost estimates. See FUTURE EARNINGS POTENTIAL – "Environmental Matters – Environmental Laws and Regulations – Coal Combustion Residuals" herein and Note 6 to the financial statements for additional information.
Given the significant judgment involved in estimating AROs, Alabama Power considers the liabilities for AROs to be critical accounting estimates.
Pension and Other Postretirement Benefits
Alabama Power's calculation of pension and other postretirement benefits expense is dependent on a number of assumptions. These assumptions include discount rates, healthcare cost trend rates, expected long-term return on plan assets, mortality rates, expected salary and wage increases, and other factors. Components of pension and other postretirement benefits expense include interest and service cost on the pension and other postretirement benefit plans, expected return on plan assets, and amortization of certain unrecognized costs and obligations. Actual results that differ from the assumptions utilized are accumulated and amortized over future periods and, therefore, generally affect recognized expense and the recorded obligation in future periods. While Alabama Power believes that the assumptions used are appropriate, differences in actual experience or significant changes in assumptions would affect its pension and other postretirement benefit costs and obligations.
Key elements in determining Alabama Power's pension and other postretirement benefit expense are the expected long-term return on plan assets and the discount rate used to measure the benefit plan obligations and the periodic benefit plan expense for future periods. The expected long-term return on pension and other postretirement benefit plan assets is based on Southern Company's investment strategy, historical experience, and expectations for long-term rates of return that consider external actuarial advice. Southern Company determines the long-term return on plan assets by applying the long-term rate of expected returns on various asset classes to Southern Company's target asset allocation. For purposes of determining Alabama Power's liability related to the pension and other postretirement benefit plans, Southern Company discounts the future related cash flows using a single-point discount rate developed from the weighted average of market-observed yields for high quality fixed income securities with maturities that correspond to expected benefit payments.
A 25 basis point change in any significant assumption (discount rate, salary increases, or long-term rate of return on plan assets) would result in a $9 million or less change in total annual benefit expense, a $99 million or less change in the projected obligation for the pension plan, and an $11 million or less change in the projected obligation for other post retirement benefit plans.
Alabama Power recorded pension costs of $27 million, $9 million, and $11 million in 2018, 2017, and 2016, respectively. Postretirement benefit costs for Alabama Power were $2 million, $3 million, and $4 million in 2018, 2017, and 2016, respectively. Such amounts are dependent on several factors including trust earnings and changes to the plans. A portion of pension and other postretirement benefit costs is capitalized based on construction-related labor charges. Pension and other postretirement benefit costs are a component of the regulated rates and generally do not have a long-term effect on net income.
See Note 11 to the financial statements for additional information regarding pension and other postretirement benefits.
Contingent Obligations
Alabama Power is subject to a number of federal and state laws and regulations, as well as other factors and conditions that subject it to environmental, litigation, and other risks. See FUTURE EARNINGS POTENTIAL herein and Notes 2 and 3 to the financial statements for more information regarding certain of these contingencies. Alabama Power periodically evaluates its exposure to such risks and records reserves for those matters where a non-tax-related loss is considered probable and reasonably estimable. The adequacy of reserves can be significantly affected by external events or conditions that can be unpredictable; thus, the ultimate outcome of such matters could materially affect Alabama Power's results of operations, cash flows, or financial condition.

MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS (continued)
Alabama Power Company 2018 Annual Report

Recently Issued Accounting Standards
See Note 1 to the financial statements under "Recently Adopted Accounting Standards" for additional information.
In 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-02, Leases (Topic 842) (ASU 2016-02). ASU 2016-02 requires lessees to recognize on the balance sheet a lease liability and a right-of-use asset for all leases. ASU 2016-02 also changes the recognition, measurement, and presentation of expense associated with leases and provides clarification regarding the identification of certain components of contracts that would represent a lease. The accounting required by lessors is relatively unchanged. ASU 2016-02 is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2018 and Alabama Power adopted the new standard effective January 1, 2019.
Alabama Power elected the transition methodology provided by ASU No. 2018-11, Leases (Topic 842): Targeted Improvements, whereby the requirements of ASU 2016-02 are applied on a prospective basis as of the adoption date of January 1, 2019, without restating prior periods. Alabama Power elected the package of practical expedients provided by ASU 2016-02 that allows prior determinations of whether existing contracts are, or contain, leases and the classification of existing leases to continue without reassessment. Additionally, Alabama Power applied the use-of-hindsight practical expedient in determining lease terms as of the date of adoption and elected the practical expedient that allows existing land easements not previously accounted for as leases not to be reassessed. Alabama Power also made accounting policy elections to account for short-term leases in all asset classes as off-balance sheet leases and combined lease and non-lease components in the computations of lease obligations and right-of-use assets for most asset classes.
Alabama Power completed the implementation of a new application to track and account for its leases and updated its internal controls and accounting policies to support the accounting for leases under ASU 2016-02. Alabama Power completed its lease inventory and determined its most significant leases involve PPAs. In the first quarter 2019, the adoption of ASU 2016-02 resulted in recording lease liabilities and right-of-use assets on Alabama Power's balance sheet each totaling approximately $195 million, with no impact on Alabama Power's statement of income.
FINANCIAL CONDITION AND LIQUIDITY
Overview
Alabama Power's financial condition remained stable at December 31, 2018. Alabama Power's cash requirements primarily consist of funding ongoing operations, common stock dividends, capital expenditures, and debt maturities. Capital expenditures and other investing activities include investments to meet projected long-term demand requirements, to maintain existing generation facilities, to comply with environmental regulations including adding environmental modifications to certain existing generating units and closures of ash ponds, to expand and improve transmission and distribution facilities, and for restoration following major storms. Operating cash flows provide a substantial portion of Alabama Power's cash needs. For the three-year period from 2019 through 2021, Alabama Power's projected common stock dividends, capital expenditures, and debt maturities are expected to exceed operating cash flows. Alabama Power plans to finance future cash needs in excess of its operating cash flows primarily through external securities issuances, borrowings from financial institutions, or equity contributions from Southern Company. Alabama Power plans to use commercial paper to manage seasonal variations in operating cash flows and for other working capital needs. Alabama Power intends to continue to monitor its access to short-term and long-term capital markets as well as its bank credit arrangements to meet future capital and liquidity needs. See "Sources of Capital," "Financing Activities," and "Capital Requirements and Contractual Obligations" herein for additional information.
Alabama Power's investments in the qualified pension plan and the nuclear decommissioning trust funds decreased in value as of December 31, 2018 as compared to December 31, 2017. No contributions to the qualified pension plan were made for the year ended December 31, 2018 and no mandatory contributions to the qualified pension plan are anticipated during 2019. Alabama Power's funding obligations for the nuclear decommissioning trust funds are based on the most recent site study completed in 2018, and the next study is expected to be conducted by 2023. See Notes 6 and 11 to the financial statements under "Nuclear Decommissioning" and "Pension Plans," respectively, for additional information.
Net cash provided from operating activities totaled $1.9 billion for 2018, an increase of $44 million as compared to 2017. The increase in cash provided from operating activities was primarily due to an increase in weather-related revenues, fuel cost recovery, and income tax refunds received in 2018, partially offset by materials and supplies purchases, the timing of vendor payments, and settlement of AROs. Net cash provided from operating activities totaled $1.8 billion for 2017, a decrease of $112 million as compared to 2017. The decrease in cash provided from operating activities was primarily due to the timing of income tax payments in 2017 and the receipt of income tax refunds in 2016 as a result of bonus depreciation, partially offset by the voluntary contribution to the qualified pension plan in 2016.

MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS (continued)
Alabama Power Company 2018 Annual Report

Net cash used for investing activities totaled $2.3 billion for 2018, $1.9 billion for 2017, and $1.4 billion for 2016. These activities were primarily related to gross property additions for environmental, distribution, transmission, and steam generation assets.
Net cash provided from financing activities totaled $177 million in 2018 primarily due to issuances of long-term debt and additional capital contributions from Southern Company, partially offset by the payment of common stock dividends and a maturity of long-term debt. Net cash provided from financing activities totaled $163 million in 2017 primarily due to issuances of long-term debt and additional capital contributions from Southern Company, partially offset by the payment of common stock dividends and maturities of long-term debt. Fluctuations in cash flow from financing activities vary from year to year based on capital needs and the maturity or redemption of securities.
Significant balance sheet changes for 2018 included increases of $2.84 billion in property, plant, and equipment primarily due to $1.35 billion in AROs and additions to nuclear, distribution, and transmission assets. Other changes include $522 million in capital contributions from Southern Company and $295 million in long-term debt primarily due to a senior notes issuance. See Notes 6 and 8 to the financial statements for additional information related to changes in Alabama Power's AROs and financing activities, respectively.
Alabama Power's ratio of common equity to total capitalization plus short-term debt was 47.0% and 46.3% at December 31, 2018 and 2017, respectively. See Note 8 to the financial statements for additional information.
Sources of Capital
Alabama Power plans to obtain the funds to meet its future capital needs from sources similar to those used in the past, which were primarily from operating cash flows, external security issuances, borrowings from financial institutions, and equity contributions from Southern Company. However, the amount, type, and timing of any future financings, if needed, will depend upon prevailing market conditions, regulatory approval, and other factors. Subsequent to December 31, 2018, Alabama Power received a capital contribution totaling $1.225 billion from Southern Company.
Security issuances are subject to regulatory approval by the Alabama PSC. Additionally, with respect to the public offering of securities, Alabama Power files registration statements with the SEC under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended. The amounts of securities authorized by the Alabama PSC are continuously monitored and appropriate filings are made to ensure flexibility in the capital markets.
Alabama Power obtains financing separately without credit support from any affiliate. See Note 8 to the financial statements under "Bank Credit Arrangements" for additional information. The Southern Company system does not maintain a centralized cash or money pool. Therefore, funds of Alabama Power are not commingled with funds of any other company in the Southern Company system.
At December 31, 2018, Alabama Power's current liabilities exceeded current assets by $50 million. Alabama Power's current liabilities sometimes exceed current assets because of long-term debt maturities and the periodic use of short-term debt as a funding source, as well as significant seasonal fluctuations in cash needs.
At December 31, 2018, Alabama Power had approximately $313 million of cash and cash equivalents. Committed credit arrangements with banks at December 31, 2018 were as follows:
Expires     Expires Within One Year
2019 2020 2022 Total Unused Term Out No Term Out
(in millions) (in millions) (in millions)
$33
 $500
 $800
 $1,333
 $1,333
 $
 $33
See Note 8 to the financial statements under "Bank Credit Arrangements" for additional information.
Most of these bank credit arrangements, as well as Alabama Power's term loan arrangements, contain covenants that limit debt levels and contain cross-acceleration provisions to other indebtedness (including guarantee obligations) of Alabama Power. Such cross-acceleration provisions to other indebtedness would trigger an event of default if Alabama Power defaulted on indebtedness, the payment of which was then accelerated. At December 31, 2018, Alabama Power was in compliance with all such covenants. None of the bank credit arrangements contain material adverse change clauses at the time of borrowings.
Subject to applicable market conditions, Alabama Power expects to renew or replace its bank credit arrangements as needed prior to expiration. In connection therewith, Alabama Power may extend the maturity dates and/or increase or decrease the lending commitments thereunder.

MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS (continued)
Alabama Power Company 2018 Annual Report

A portion of the unused credit with banks is allocated to provide liquidity support to Alabama Power's pollution control revenue bonds and commercial paper programs. The amount of variable rate pollution control revenue bonds outstanding requiring liquidity support was $854 million at December 31, 2018.
Alabama Power also has substantial cash flow from operating activities and access to the capital markets, including a commercial paper program, to meet liquidity needs. Alabama Power may meet short-term cash needs through its commercial paper program. Alabama Power may also meet short-term cash needs through a Southern Company subsidiary organized to issue and sell commercial paper at the request and for the benefit of Alabama Power and the other traditional electric operating companies. Proceeds from such issuances for the benefit of Alabama Power are loaned directly to Alabama Power. The obligations of each traditional electric operating company under these arrangements are several and there is no cross-affiliate credit support.
Details of short-term borrowings were as follows:
 Short-term Debt at the End of the Period 
Short-term Debt During the Period (*)
 Amount Outstanding Weighted Average Interest Rate Average
Amount Outstanding
 Weighted
Average
Interest
Rate
 Maximum
Amount
Outstanding
 (in millions)   (in millions)   (in millions)
December 31, 2018$
 % $27
 2.3% $258
December 31, 2017$3
 3.7% $25
 1.3% $223
December 31, 2016$
 % $16
 0.6% $200
(*)Average and maximum amounts are based upon daily balances during the 12-month periods ended December 31, 2018, 2017, and 2016.
Alabama Power believes that the need for working capital can be adequately met by utilizing commercial paper programs, lines of credit, and operating cash flows.
Financing Activities
In June 2018, Alabama Power issued $500 million aggregate principal amount of Series 2018A 4.300% Senior Notes due July 15, 2048. The proceeds were used to repay outstanding commercial paper and for general corporate purposes, including Alabama Power's continuous construction program.
In October 2018, Alabama Power purchased and held $120 million aggregate principal amount of The Industrial Development Board of the City of Mobile, Alabama Pollution Control Revenue Bonds (Alabama Power Company Plant Barry Project), Series 2008. Alabama Power reoffered these bonds to the public in November 2018.
In November 2018, Alabama Power guaranteed a $100 million three-year bank term loan for SEGCO. See Note 9 to the financial statements under "Guarantees" for additional information.
Subsequent to December 31, 2018, Alabama Power repaid at maturity $200 million aggregate principal amount of Series Z 5.125% Senior Notes due February 15, 2019.
In addition to any financings that may be necessary to meet capital requirements and contractual obligations, Alabama Power plans to continue, when economically feasible, a program to retire higher-cost securities and replace these obligations with lower-cost capital if market conditions permit.
Credit Rating Risk
At December 31, 2018, Alabama Power did not have any credit arrangements that would require material changes in payment schedules or terminations as a result of a credit rating downgrade.

MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS (continued)
Alabama Power Company 2018 Annual Report

There are certain contracts that could require collateral, but not accelerated payment, in the event of a credit rating change to BBB and/or Baa2 or below. These contracts are primarily for physical electricity purchases, fuel purchases, fuel transportation and storage, energy price risk management, and transmission.
The maximum potential collateral requirements under these contracts at December 31, 2018 were as follows:
Credit Ratings
Maximum Potential
Collateral
Requirements
 (in millions)
At BBB and/or Baa2$1
At BBB- and/or Baa3$1
Below BBB- and/or Baa3$356
Included in these amounts are certain agreements that could require collateral in the event that either Alabama Power or Georgia Power (an affiliate of Alabama Power) has a credit rating change to below investment grade. Generally, collateral may be provided by a Southern Company guaranty, letter of credit, or cash. Additionally, a credit rating downgrade could impact the ability of Alabama Power to access capital markets and would be likely to impact the cost at which it does so.
On September 28, 2018, Fitch assigned a negative rating outlook to the ratings of Southern Company and certain of its subsidiaries (including Alabama Power).
Also on September 28, 2018, Moody's revised its rating outlook for Alabama Power from negative to stable.
As a result of the Tax Reform Legislation, certain financial metrics, such as the funds from operations to debt percentage, used by the credit rating agencies to assess Southern Company and its subsidiaries, including Alabama Power, may be negatively impacted. The modifications to Rate RSE and other commitments approved by the Alabama PSC are expected to help mitigate these potential adverse impacts to certain credit metrics and will help Alabama Power meet its goal of achieving an equity ratio of approximately 55% by the end of 2025. See Note 2 to the financial statements under "Alabama Power – Rate RSE" for additional information.
Market Price Risk
Due to cost-based rate regulation and other various cost recovery mechanisms, Alabama Power continues to have limited exposure to market volatility in interest rates, commodity fuel prices, and prices of electricity. To manage the volatility attributable to these exposures, Alabama Power nets the exposures, where possible, to take advantage of natural offsets and enters into various derivative transactions for the remaining exposures pursuant to Alabama Power's policies in areas such as counterparty exposure and risk management practices. Alabama Power's policy is that derivatives are to be used primarily for hedging purposes and mandates strict adherence to all applicable risk management policies. Derivative positions are monitored using techniques including, but not limited to, market valuation, value at risk, stress testing, and sensitivity analysis.
To mitigate future exposure to changes in interest rates, Alabama Power may enter into derivatives designated as hedges. The weighted average interest rate on $1.1 billion of long-term variable interest rate exposure at December 31, 2018 was 2.5%. If Alabama Power sustained a 100 basis point change in interest rates for all long-term variable interest rate exposure, the change would affect annualized interest expense by approximately $11 million at December 31, 2018. See Note 1 to the financial statements under "Financial Instruments" and Note 14 to the financial statements for additional information.
To mitigate residual risks relative to movements in electricity prices, Alabama Power enters into physical fixed-price contracts for the purchase and sale of electricity through the wholesale electricity market and financial hedge contracts for natural gas purchases. Alabama Power continues to manage a retail fuel-hedging program implemented per the guidelines of the Alabama PSC. Alabama Power had no material change in market risk exposure for the year ended December 31, 2018 when compared to the year ended December 31, 2017.
In addition, Rate ECR allows the recovery of specific costs associated with the sales of natural gas that become necessary due to operating considerations at Alabama Power's electric generating facilities. Rate ECR also allows recovery of the cost of financial instruments used for hedging market price risk up to 75% of the budgeted annual amount of natural gas purchases. Alabama Power may not engage in natural gas hedging activities that extend beyond a rolling 42-month window. Also, the premiums paid for natural gas financial options may not exceed 5% of Alabama Power's natural gas budget for that year.

MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS (continued)
Alabama Power Company 2018 Annual Report

The changes in fair value of energy-related derivative contracts are substantially attributable to both the volume and the price of natural gas. For the years ended December 31, the changes in fair value of energy-related derivative contracts, the majority of which are composed of regulatory hedges, were as follows:
 
2018
Changes
 
2017
Changes
 Fair Value
 (in millions)
Contracts outstanding at the beginning of the period, assets (liabilities), net$(6) $12
Contracts realized or settled(2) (1)
Current period changes(*)
4
 (17)
Contracts outstanding at the end of the period, assets (liabilities), net$(4) $(6)
(*)Current period changes also include the changes in fair value of new contracts entered into during the period, if any.
The net hedge volumes of energy-related derivative contracts at December 31, 2018 and 2017 were as follows:
 2018 2017
 mmBtu Volume
 (in millions)
Commodity – Natural gas swaps65
 64
Commodity – Natural gas options9
 5
Total hedge volume74
 69
The weighted average swap contract cost above market prices was approximately $0.08 per mmBtu at December 31, 2018 and December 31, 2017. The change in option fair value is primarily attributable to the volatility of the market and the underlying change in the natural gas price. Substantially all of the natural gas hedge gains and losses are recovered through Alabama Power's retail energy cost recovery clause.
At December 31, 2018 and 2017, substantially all of Alabama Power's energy-related derivative contracts were designated as regulatory hedges and were related to Alabama Power's fuel-hedging program. Therefore, gains and losses are initially recorded as regulatory liabilities and assets, respectively, and then are included in fuel expense as they are recovered through the energy cost recovery clause. Certain other gains and losses on energy-related derivatives, designated as cash flow hedges, are initially deferred in OCI before being recognized in income in the same period as the hedged transaction. Gains and losses on energy-related derivative contracts that are not designated or fail to qualify as hedges are recognized in the statements of income as incurred and were not material for any year presented.
Alabama Power uses over-the-counter contracts that are not exchange traded but are fair valued using prices which are market observable, and thus fall into Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy. See Note 13 to the financial statements for further discussion of fair value measurements. The maturities of the energy-related derivative contracts, which are primarily Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy, at December 31, 2018 were as follows:
   Fair Value Measurements
   December 31, 2018
 Total Maturity
 Fair Value  Year 1  Years 2&3
 (in millions)
Level 1$
 $
 $
Level 2(4) (1) (3)
Level 3
 
 
Fair value of contracts outstanding at end of period$(4) $(1) $(3)
Alabama Power is exposed to market price risk in the event of nonperformance by counterparties to energy-related and interest rate derivative contracts. Alabama Power only enters into agreements and material transactions with counterparties that have

MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS (continued)
Alabama Power Company 2018 Annual Report

investment grade credit ratings by Moody's and S&P, or with counterparties who have posted collateral to cover potential credit exposure. Therefore, Alabama Power does not anticipate market risk exposure from nonperformance by the counterparties. For additional information, see Note 1 to the financial statements under "Financial Instruments" and Note 14 to the financial statements.
Capital Requirements and Contractual Obligations
The construction program of Alabama Power is currently estimated to total $1.8 billion for 2019, $1.6 billion for 2020, $1.6 billion for 2021, $1.4 billion for 2022, and $1.5 billion for 2023. The construction program includes capital expenditures related to contractual purchase commitments for nuclear fuel and capital expenditures covered under LTSAs. Estimated capital expenditures to comply with environmental laws and regulations included in these amounts are $226 million for 2019, $68 million for 2020, $118 million for 2021, $112 million for 2022, and $111 million for 2023. These estimated expenditures do not include any potential compliance costs associated with pending regulation of CO2 emissions from fossil-fuel-fired electric generating units. See FUTURE EARNINGS POTENTIAL – "Environmental Matters – Environmental Laws and Regulations" and "– Global Climate Issues" herein for additional information.
Alabama Power also anticipates costs associated with closure-in-place and monitoring of ash ponds in accordance with the CCR Rule, which are reflected in Alabama Power's ARO liabilities. These costs, which are expected to change and could change materially as underlying assumptions are refined and the cost, method, and timing of compliance activities continue to be evaluated, are currently estimated to be $232 million for 2019, $238 million for 2020, $246 million for 2021, $252 million for 2022, and $258 million for 2023. See FUTURE EARNINGS POTENTIAL – "Environmental Matters – Environmental Laws and Regulations – Coal Combustion Residuals" herein and Note 6 to the financial statements for additional information. Costs associated with the CCR Rule are expected to be recovered through Rate CNP Compliance.
The construction program is subject to periodic review and revision, and actual construction costs may vary from these estimates because of numerous factors. These factors include: changes in business conditions; changes in load projections; changes in environmental laws and regulations; the outcome of any legal challenges to environmental rules; changes in generating plants, including unit retirements and replacements and adding or changing fuel sources at existing generating units, to meet regulatory requirements; changes in the expected environmental compliance program; changes in FERC rules and regulations; Alabama PSC approvals; changes in legislation; the cost and efficiency of construction labor, equipment, and materials; project scope and design changes; storm impacts; and the cost of capital. In addition, there can be no assurance that costs related to capital expenditures will be fully recovered.
As a result of NRC requirements, Alabama Power has external trust funds for nuclear decommissioning costs; however, Alabama Power currently has no additional funding requirements. For additional information, see Note 6 to the financial statements under "Nuclear Decommissioning."
In addition, as discussed in Note 11 to the financial statements, Alabama Power provides postretirement benefits to substantially all employees and funds trusts to the extent required by the Alabama PSC and the FERC.
Funding requirements related to obligations associated with scheduled maturities of long-term debt, as well as the related interest, derivative obligations, pension and other postretirement benefit plans, preferred stock dividends, leases, other purchase commitments, and ARO settlements are detailed in the contractual obligations table that follows. See Notes 1, 6, 8, 9, 11, and 14 to the financial statements for additional information.

MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS (continued)
Alabama Power Company 2018 Annual Report

Contractual Obligations
Contractual obligations at December 31, 2018 were as follows:
 2019 2020- 2021 2022- 2023 After 2023 Total
 (in millions)
Long-term debt(a) —
         
Principal$200
 $560
 $1,050
 $6,377
 $8,187
Interest330
 630
 575
 4,751
 6,286
Preferred stock dividends(b)
15
 29
 29
 
 73
Financial derivative obligations(c)
4
 6
 
 
 10
Operating leases(d)
12
 17
 9
 1
 39
Capital lease1
 1
 1
 1
 4
Purchase commitments —         
Capital(e)
1,671
 3,049
 2,536
 
 7,256
Fuel(f)
1,072
 1,342
 531
 1,108
 4,053
Purchased power(g)
83
 178
 140
 512
 913
Other(h)
42
 61
 61
 277
 441
ARO settlements(i)
232
 485
 510
 
 1,227
Pension and other postretirement benefit plans(j)
16
 32
 
 
 48
Total$3,678
 $6,390
 $5,442
 $13,027
 $28,537
(a)All amounts are reflected based on final maturity dates. Alabama Power plans to continue, when economically feasible, to retire higher-cost securities and replace these obligations with lower-cost capital if market conditions permit. Variable rate interest obligations are estimated based on rates at December 31, 2018, as reflected in the statements of capitalization. Fixed rates include, where applicable, the effects of interest rate derivatives employed to manage interest rate risk. Long-term debt excludes capital lease amounts (shown separately).
(b)Preferred stock does not mature; therefore, amounts are provided for the next five years only.
(c)Includes derivative liabilities related to cash flow hedges of forecasted debt, as well as energy-related derivatives. For additional information, see Notes 1 and 14 to the financial statements.
(d)Excludes PPAs that are accounted for as leases and are included in purchased power.
(e)Alabama Power provides estimated capital expenditures for a five-year period, including capital expenditures associated with environmental regulations. These amounts exclude contractual purchase commitments for nuclear fuel, capital expenditures covered under LTSAs, and estimated capital expenditures for AROs, which are reflected in "Fuel," "Other," and "ARO settlements," respectively. At December 31, 2018, purchase commitments were outstanding in connection with the construction program. See FUTURE EARNINGS POTENTIAL – "Environmental Matters – Environmental Laws and Regulations" herein for additional information.
(f)Includes commitments to purchase coal, nuclear fuel, and natural gas, as well as the related transportation and storage. In most cases, these contracts contain provisions for price escalation, minimum purchase levels, and other financial commitments. Natural gas purchase commitments are based on various indices at the time of delivery. Amounts reflected for natural gas purchase commitments have been estimated based on the NYMEX future prices at December 31, 2018.
(g)Estimated minimum long-term obligations for various long-term commitments for the purchase of capacity and energy.
(h)Includes LTSAs and contracts for the procurement of limestone. LTSAs include price escalation based on inflation indices.
(i)
Represents estimated costs for a five-year period associated with closing and monitoring ash ponds in accordance with the CCR Rule and the related state rule, which are reflected in Alabama Power's ARO liabilities. Material expenditures in future years for ARO settlements also will be required for ash ponds, nuclear decommissioning, and other liabilities reflected in Alabama Power's AROs. See FUTURE EARNINGS POTENTIAL – "Environmental MattersEnvironmental Laws and RegulationsCoal Combustion Residuals" herein and Note 6 to the financial statements for additional information.
(j)Alabama Power forecasts contributions to the pension and other postretirement benefit plans over a three-year period. Alabama Power anticipates no mandatory contributions to the qualified pension plan during the next three years. Amounts presented represent estimated benefit payments for the nonqualified pension plans, estimated non-trust benefit payments for the other postretirement benefit plans, and estimated contributions to the other postretirement benefit plan trusts, all of which will be made from Alabama Power's corporate assets. See Note 11 to the financial statements for additional information related to the pension and other postretirement benefit plans, including estimated benefit payments. Certain benefit payments will be made through the related benefit plans. Other benefit payments will be made from Alabama Power's corporate assets.

MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
Georgia Power Company 2018 Annual Report



OVERVIEW
Business Activities
Georgia Power operates as a vertically integrated utility providing electric service to retail customers within its traditional service territory located within the State of Georgia and to wholesale customers in the Southeast.
Many factors affect the opportunities, challenges, and risks of Georgia Power's business of providing electric service. These factors include the ability to maintain a constructive regulatory environment, to maintain and grow energy sales and customers, and to effectively manage and secure timely recovery of costs. These costs include those related to projected long-term demand growth, stringent environmental standards, including CCR rules, reliability, fuel, capital expenditures, including new generating facilities and expanding and improving transmission and distribution facilities, and restoration following major storms. Georgia Power has various regulatory mechanisms that operate to address cost recovery. Effectively operating pursuant to these regulatory mechanisms and appropriately balancing required costs and capital expenditures with customer prices will continue to challenge Georgia Power for the foreseeable future. On April 3, 2018, the Georgia PSC approved the Georgia Power Tax Reform Settlement Agreement, which provides for a total of $330 million in customer refunds for 2018 and 2019 and the deferral of certain revenues and tax benefits to be addressed in the Georgia Power 2019 Base Rate Case. The Georgia PSC also approved an increase to Georgia Power's retail equity ratio to address some of the negative cash flow and credit metric impacts of the Tax Reform Legislation. See FUTURE EARNINGS POTENTIAL – "Retail Regulatory Matters – Rate Plans" herein for additional information on the Georgia Power Tax Reform Settlement Agreement.
Georgia Power continues to focus on several key performance indicators, including, but not limited to, customer satisfaction, plant availability, system reliability, the execution of major construction projects, and net income. Georgia Power's financial success is directly tied to customer satisfaction. Key elements of ensuring customer satisfaction include outstanding service, high reliability, and competitive prices. Management uses customer satisfaction surveys to evaluate Georgia Power's results and generally targets the top quartile of these surveys in measuring performance.
See RESULTS OF OPERATIONS herein for information on Georgia Power's financial performance.
Plant Vogtle Units 3 and 4 Status
In 2009, the Georgia PSC certified construction of Plant Vogtle Units 3 and 4 (with electric generating capacity of approximately 1,100 MWs each). Georgia Power holds a 45.7% ownership interest in Plant Vogtle Units 3 and 4. In March 2017, the EPC Contractor filed for bankruptcy protection under Chapter 11 of the U.S. Bankruptcy Code. In December 2017, the Georgia PSC approved Georgia Power's recommendation to continue construction. The current expected in-service dates remain November 2021 for Unit 3 and November 2022 for Unit 4.
In the second quarter 2018, Georgia Power revised its base capital cost forecast and estimated contingency to complete construction and start-up of Plant Vogtle Units 3 and 4 to $8.0 billion and $0.4 billion, respectively, for a total project capital cost forecast of $8.4 billion (net of $1.7 billion received under the Guarantee Settlement Agreement and approximately $188 million in related Customer Refunds), with respect to Georgia Power's ownership interest. Although Georgia Power believes these incremental costs are reasonable and necessary to complete the project and the Georgia PSC's order in the seventeenth VCM proceeding specifically states that the construction of Plant Vogtle Units 3 and 4 is not subject to a cost cap, Georgia Power did not seek rate recovery for the $0.7 billion increase in costs included in the current base capital cost forecast (or any related financing costs) in the nineteenth VCM report that was approved by the Georgia PSC on February 19, 2019. In connection with future VCM filings, Georgia Power may request the Georgia PSC to evaluate costs currently included in the construction contingency estimate for rate recovery as and when they are appropriately included in the base capital cost forecast. After considering the significant level of uncertainty that exists regarding the future recoverability of costs included in the construction contingency estimate since the ultimate outcome of these matters is subject to the outcome of future assessments by management, as well as Georgia PSC decisions in these future regulatory proceedings, Georgia Power recorded a total pre-tax charge to income of $1.1 billion ($0.8 billion after tax) in the second quarter 2018.
As a result of the increase in the total project capital cost forecast and Georgia Power's decision not to seek rate recovery of the increase in the base capital costs, the holders of at least 90% of the ownership interests in Plant Vogtle Units 3 and 4 were required to vote to continue construction. On September 26, 2018, the Vogtle Owners unanimously voted to continue construction of Plant Vogtle Units 3 and 4. In connection with the vote to continue construction, Georgia Power entered into (i) a binding term sheet (Vogtle Owner Term Sheet) with the other Vogtle Owners and certain of MEAG's wholly-owned subsidiaries, including MEAG Power SPVJ, LLC (MEAG SPVJ), to take certain actions which partially mitigate potential financial exposure for the other Vogtle Owners and (ii) a term sheet (MEAG Term Sheet) with MEAG and MEAG SPVJ to provide funding with respect to MEAG

MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS (continued)
Georgia Power Company 2018 Annual Report

SPVJ's ownership interest in Plant Vogtle Units 3 and 4 under certain circumstances. On January 14, 2019, Georgia Power, MEAG, and MEAG SPVJ entered into an agreement to implement the provisions of the MEAG Term Sheet. On February 18, 2019, Georgia Power, the other Vogtle Owners, and certain of MEAG's wholly-owned subsidiaries entered into certain amendments to their joint ownership agreements to implement the provisions of the Vogtle Owner Term Sheet.
The ultimate outcome of these matters cannot be determined at this time.
See FUTURE EARNINGS POTENTIAL – "Retail Regulatory Matters – Nuclear Construction" herein for additional information on Plant Vogtle Units 3 and 4.
Earnings
Georgia Power's 2018 net income after dividends on preferred and preference stock was $0.8 billion, representing a $621 million, or 43.9%, decrease from the previous year. The decrease was due primarily to a $1.1 billion ($0.8 billion after tax) charge in the second quarter 2018 for an estimated probable loss related to Georgia Power's construction of Plant Vogtle Units 3 and 4, revenues deferred as a regulatory liability for customer bill credits related to the Tax Reform Legislation, an adjustment for an expected refund to retail customers as a result of Georgia Power's retail ROE exceeding the allowed retail ROE range under the 2013 ARP in 2018, and higher non-fuel operations and maintenance expenses. Partially offsetting the decrease were lower federal income tax expense as a result of the Tax Reform Legislation and an increase in retail revenues associated with colder weather in the first quarter 2018 and warmer weather in the second and third quarters 2018 compared to the corresponding periods in 2017.
Georgia Power's 2017 net income after dividends on preferred and preference stock was $1.4 billion, representing an $84 million, or 6.3%, increase from the previous year. The increase was due primarily to lower non-fuel operations and maintenance expenses, primarily as a result of cost containment and modernization initiatives, partially offset by lower revenues resulting from milder weather and lower customer usage as compared to 2016.
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
A condensed income statement for Georgia Power follows:
 Amount 
Increase (Decrease)
from Prior Year
 2018 2018 2017
 (in millions)
Operating revenues$8,420
 $110
 $(73)
Fuel1,698
 27
 (136)
Purchased power1,153
 115
 159
Other operations and maintenance1,860
 136
 (279)
Depreciation and amortization923
 28
 40
Taxes other than income taxes437
 28
 4
Estimated loss on Plant Vogtle Units 3 and 41,060
 1,060
 
Total operating expenses7,131
 1,394
 (212)
Operating income1,289
 (1,284) 139
Interest expense, net of amounts capitalized397
 (22) 31
Other income (expense), net115
 11
 23
Income taxes214
 (616) 50
Net income793
 (635) 81
Dividends on preferred and preference stock
 (14) (3)
Net income after dividends on preferred and preference stock$793
 $(621) $84

MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS (continued)
Georgia Power Company 2018 Annual Report

Operating Revenues
Operating revenues for 2018 were $8.4 billion, reflecting a $110 million increase from 2017. Details of operating revenues were as follows:
 2018 2017
 (in millions)
Retail — prior year$7,738
 $7,772
Estimated change resulting from —   
Rates and pricing(363) 114
Sales growth (decline)92
 (33)
Weather131
 (166)
Fuel cost recovery154
 51
Retail — current year7,752
 7,738
Wholesale revenues —   
Non-affiliates163
 163
Affiliates24
 26
Total wholesale revenues187
 189
Other operating revenues481
 383
Total operating revenues$8,420
 $8,310
Percent change1.3% (0.9)%
Retail revenues of $7.8 billion in 2018 increased $14 million, or 0.2%, compared to 2017. The significant factors driving this change are shown in the preceding table. The decrease in rates and pricing was primarily due to revenues deferred as a regulatory liability for customer bill credits related to the Tax Reform Legislation and an adjustment for an expected refund to retail customers as a result of Georgia Power's retail ROE exceeding the allowed retail ROE range under the 2013 ARP in 2018. See Note 2 to the financial statements under "Georgia Power – Rate Plans" for additional information.
Retail revenues of $7.7 billion in 2017 decreased $34 million, or 0.4%, compared to 2016. The significant factors driving this change are shown in the preceding table. The increase in rates and pricing was primarily due to an increase in revenues related to the recovery of Plant Vogtle Units 3 and 4 construction financing costs under the NCCR tariff. See Note 2 to the financial statements under "Georgia Power – Nuclear Construction – Regulatory Matters" for additional information on the NCCR tariff.
See "Energy Sales" below for a discussion of changes in the volume of energy sold, including changes related to sales growth (decline) and weather.
Electric rates include provisions to adjust billings for fluctuations in fuel costs, including the energy component of purchased power costs. Under these fuel cost recovery provisions, fuel revenues generally equal fuel expenses and do not affect net income. See FUTURE EARNINGS POTENTIAL – "Retail Regulatory Matters – Fuel Cost Recovery" herein for additional information.
Wholesale revenues from power sales to non-affiliated utilities were as follows:
 2018 2017 2016
 (in millions)
Capacity and other$54
 $67
 $72
Energy109
 96
 103
Total non-affiliated$163
 $163
 $175
Wholesale capacity revenues from PPAs are recognized either on a levelized basis over the appropriate contract period or the amounts billable under the contract terms and provide for recovery of fixed costs and a return on investment. Wholesale revenues from sales to non-affiliates will vary depending on fuel prices, the market prices of wholesale energy compared to the cost of Georgia Power's and the Southern Company system's generation, demand for energy within the Southern Company system's electric service territory, and the availability of the Southern Company system's generation. Increases and decreases in energy revenues that are driven by fuel prices are accompanied by an increase or decrease in fuel costs and do not have a significant

MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS (continued)
Georgia Power Company 2018 Annual Report

impact on net income. Short-term opportunity sales are made at market-based rates that generally provide a margin above Georgia Power's variable cost of energy.
Wholesale revenues from non-affiliated sales remained flat in 2018 as compared to 2017. Capacity revenues decreased $13 million, offset by a $13 million increase in energy revenues. The decrease in capacity revenues was primarily due to the expiration of a wholesale contract in the fourth quarter 2017. The increase in energy revenues was primarily due to increased demand, partially offset by the effects of expired contracts. Wholesale revenues from non-affiliated sales decreased $12 million, or 6.9%, in 2017 as compared to 2016. The decrease was related to decreases of $5 million in capacity revenues and $7 million in energy revenues. The decrease in capacity revenues reflects the expiration of wholesale contracts in the first and second quarters of 2016. The decrease in energy revenues was primarily due to lower demand and the effects of the expired contracts.
Wholesale revenues from sales to affiliated companies will vary depending on demand and the availability and cost of generating resources at each company. These affiliate sales are made in accordance with the IIC, as approved by the FERC. These transactions do not have a significant impact on earnings since this energy is generally sold at marginal cost. In 2018, wholesale revenues from sales to affiliates decreased $2 million as compared to 2017. In 2017, wholesale revenues from sales to affiliates decreased $16 million as compared to 2016 due to a 42.8% decrease in KWH sales as a result of the lower market cost of available energy compared to the cost of Georgia Power-owned generation.
Other operating revenues increased $98 million, or 25.6%, in 2018 from the prior year largely due to $94 million of revenues primarily from unregulated sales of products and services that were reclassified as other revenues as a result of the adoption of ASC 606, Revenue from Contracts with Customers (ASC 606). In prior periods, these revenues were included in other income (expense), net. See Note 1 to the financial statements for additional information regarding Georgia Power's adoption of ASC 606.
Other operating revenues decreased $11 million, or 2.8%, in 2017 from the prior year primarily due to a $15 million decrease in open access transmission tariff revenues, primarily as a result of the expiration of long-term transmission services contracts, and a $14 million adjustment in 2016 for customer temporary facilities services revenues, partially offset by a $13 million increase in outdoor lighting sales revenues due to increased sales in new and replacement markets, primarily attributable to LED conversions.
Energy Sales
Changes in revenues are influenced heavily by the change in the volume of energy sold from year to year. KWH sales for 2018 and the percent change from the prior year were as follows:
 
Total
KWHs
 
Total KWH
Percent Change
 
Weather-Adjusted
Percent Change
 2018 2018 2017 2018 2017
 (in billions)        
Residential28.3
 8.4 % (5.2)% 2.6% (0.2)%
Commercial33.0
 2.5
 (2.4) 1.6
 (0.9)
Industrial23.7
 0.6
 (1.0) 0.2
 (0.1)
Other0.5
 (6.0) (4.2) (6.3) (4.0)
Total retail85.5
 3.8
 (2.9) 1.5% (0.4)%
Wholesale         
Non-affiliates3.2
 (4.2) (4.0)    
Affiliates0.5
 (34.2) (42.8)    
Total wholesale3.7
 (10.1) (15.3)    
Total energy sales89.2
 3.1 % (3.6)%    
Changes in retail energy sales are generally the result of changes in electricity usage by customers, changes in weather, and changes in the number of customers.
In 2018, KWH sales for the residential class increased 8.4% compared to 2017 primarily due to colder weather in the first quarter 2018 and warmer weather in the second and third quarters 2018 compared to the corresponding periods in 2017. Weather-adjusted residential KWH sales and weather-adjusted commercial KWH sales increased by 2.6% and 1.6%, respectively, largely due to customer growth. Weather-adjusted industrial KWH sales were essentially flat primarily due to increased demand in the primary and fabricated metal sectors, offset by decreased demand in the textiles and stone, clay, and glass sectors. Additionally, customer usage for all customer classes increased due to the negative impacts of Hurricane Irma in 2017.

MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS (continued)
Georgia Power Company 2018 Annual Report

In 2017, KWH sales for the residential class decreased 5.2% compared to 2016 primarily due to milder weather in 2017. Weather-adjusted residential KWH sales decreased by 0.2% primarily due to a decline in average customer usage resulting from an increase in multi-family housing and energy saving initiatives, partially offset by customer growth. Weather-adjusted commercial KWH sales decreased by 0.9% primarily due to a decline in average customer usage resulting from an increase in electronic commerce transactions and energy saving initiatives, partially offset by customer growth. Weather-adjusted industrial KWH sales were essentially flat primarily due to decreased demand in the chemicals and paper sectors, offset by increased demand in the textile, non-manufacturing, and rubber sectors. Additionally, Hurricane Irma negatively impacted customer usage for all customer classes in 2017.
See "Operating Revenues" above for a discussion of significant changes in wholesale sales to non-affiliates and affiliated companies.
Fuel and Purchased Power Expenses
Fuel costs constitute one of the largest expenses for Georgia Power. The mix of fuel sources for the generation of electricity is determined primarily by demand, the unit cost of fuel consumed, and the availability of generating units. Additionally, Georgia Power purchases a portion of its electricity needs from the wholesale market.
Details of Georgia Power's generation and purchased power were as follows:
 2018 2017 2016
Total generation (in billions of KWHs)
65.2
 63.2
 68.4
Total purchased power (in billions of KWHs)
27.9
 26.9
 24.8
Sources of generation (percent) —
     
Gas42
 41
 38
Coal30
 32
 36
Nuclear25
 25
 24
Hydro3
 2
 2
Cost of fuel, generated (in cents per net KWH) 
     
Gas2.75
 2.68
 2.36
Coal3.21
 3.17
 3.28
Nuclear0.82
 0.83
 0.85
Average cost of fuel, generated (in cents per net KWH)
2.40
 2.36
 2.33
Average cost of purchased power (in cents per net KWH)(*)
4.79
 4.62
 4.53
(*) Average cost of purchased power includes fuel purchased by Georgia Power for tolling agreements where power is generated by the provider.
Fuel and purchased power expenses were $2.9 billion in 2018, an increase of $142 million, or 5.2%, compared to 2017. The increase was primarily due to a $74 million increase in the average cost of fuel and purchased power primarily related to higher natural gas and energy prices and an increase of $68 million related to the volume of KWHs generated and purchased primarily due to colder weather in the first quarter 2018 and warmer weather in the second and third quarters 2018 compared to the corresponding periods in 2017.
Fuel and purchased power expenses were $2.7 billion in 2017, an increase of $23 million, or 0.9%, compared to 2016. The increase was primarily due to an $84 million increase in the average cost of fuel and purchased power primarily related to higher natural gas prices, partially offset by a net decrease of $61 million related to the volume of KWHs generated and purchased primarily due to milder weather, resulting in lower customer demand.
Fuel and purchased power energy transactions do not have a significant impact on earnings since these fuel expenses are generally offset by fuel revenues through Georgia Power's fuel cost recovery mechanism. See FUTURE EARNINGS POTENTIAL – "Retail Regulatory Matters – Fuel Cost Recovery" herein for additional information.
Fuel
Fuel expense was $1.7 billion in 2018, an increase of $27 million, or 1.6%, compared to 2017. The increase was primarily due to an increase of 2.6% in the average cost of natural gas per KWH generated and an increase of 1.9% in the volume of KWHs generated largely due to colder weather in the first quarter 2018 and warmer weather in the second and third quarters 2018 compared to the corresponding periods in 2017. Fuel expense was $1.7 billion in 2017, a decrease of $136 million, or 7.5%,

MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS (continued)
Georgia Power Company 2018 Annual Report

compared to 2016. The decrease was primarily due to a decrease of 7.7% in the volume of KWHs generated largely due to milder weather, resulting in lower customer demand, partially offset by an increase of 13.6% in the average cost of natural gas per KWH generated.
Purchased Power - Non-Affiliates
Purchased power expense from non-affiliates was $430 million in 2018, an increase of $14 million, or 3.4%, compared to 2017. The increase was primarily due to an 8.5% increase in the average cost per KWH purchased primarily due to higher energy prices, partially offset by a decrease of 3.8% in volume of KWHs purchased primarily due to the higher market cost of available energy as compared to Southern Company system resources. Purchased power expense from non-affiliates was $416 million in 2017, an increase of $55 million, or 15.2%, compared to 2016. The increase was primarily due to a 13.4% increase in the volume of KWHs purchased primarily due to unplanned outages at Georgia Power-owned generating units.
Energy purchases from non-affiliates will vary depending on the market prices of wholesale energy as compared to the cost of the Southern Company system's generation, demand for energy within the Southern Company system's electric service territory, and the availability of the Southern Company system's generation.
Purchased Power - Affiliates
Purchased power expense from affiliates was $723 million in 2018, an increase of $101 million, or 16.2%, compared to 2017. The increase was primarily due to a 6.3% increase in the volume of KWHs purchased due to colder weather in the first quarter 2018 and scheduled generation outages and warmer weather in the second and third quarters 2018 and a 3.0% increase in the average cost per KWH purchased primarily resulting from higher energy prices. Purchased power expense from affiliates was $622 million in 2017, an increase of $104 million, or 20.1%, compared to 2016. The increase was primarily due to a 7.0% increase in the volume of KWHs purchased to support Southern Company system transmission reliability and as a result of unplanned outages at Georgia Power-owned generating units and a 1.8% increase in the average cost per KWH purchased primarily resulting from higher natural gas prices.
Energy purchases from affiliates will vary depending on the demand and the availability and cost of generating resources at each company within the Southern Company system. These purchases are made in accordance with the IIC or other contractual agreements, all as approved by the FERC.
Other Operations and Maintenance Expenses
In 2018, other operations and maintenance expenses increased $136 million, or 7.9%, compared to 2017. The increase was primarily due to $88 million of expenses from unregulated sales of products and services that were reclassified to other operations and maintenance expenses as a result of the adoption of ASC 606. In prior periods, these expenses were included in other income (expense), net. Also contributing to the increase were a $39 million decrease in gains on sales of assets and a $28 million increase in transmission and distribution overhead line maintenance, primarily related to additional vegetation management, partially offset by a decrease of $18 million associated with an employee attrition plan in 2017. See Note 1 to the financial statements for additional information regarding Georgia Power's adoption of ASC 606.
In 2017, other operations and maintenance expenses decreased $279 million, or 13.9%, compared to 2016. The decrease was primarily due to cost containment and modernization activities implemented in the third quarter 2016 that contributed to decreases of $85 million in generation maintenance costs, $46 million in transmission and distribution overhead line maintenance, $22 million in employee benefits, and $22 million in customer accounts and sales costs. Other factors include a $40 million increase in gains on sales of assets, a $19 million decrease in scheduled generation outage costs, and a $15 million decrease in customer assistance expenses, primarily in demand-side management costs related to the timing of new programs.
Depreciation and Amortization
Depreciation and amortization increased $28 million, or 3.1%, in 2018 compared to 2017. The increase was primarily due to additional plant in service.
Depreciation and amortization increased $40 million, or 4.7%, in 2017 compared to 2016. The increase was primarily due to a $33 million increase related to additional plant in service and a $14 million decrease in amortization of regulatory liabilities related to other cost of removal obligations that expired in December 2016, partially offset by a $9 million decrease in depreciation related to generating unit retirements in 2016 and amortization of regulatory assets related to certain cancelled environmental and fuel conversion projects that expired in December 2016.
See Note 5 to the financial statements under "Depreciation and Amortization" for additional information.

MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS (continued)
Georgia Power Company 2018 Annual Report

Taxes Other Than Income Taxes
In 2018, taxes other than income taxes increased $28 million, or 6.8%, compared to 2017 primarily due to increases of $19 million in property taxes as a result of an increase in the assessed value of property and $11 million in municipal franchise fees largely related to higher retail revenues. In 2017, taxes other than income taxes increased $4 million, or 1.0%, compared to 2016.
Estimated Loss on Plant Vogtle Units 3 and 4
In the second quarter 2018, an estimated probable loss of $1.1 billion was recorded to reflect Georgia Power's revised estimate to complete construction and start-up of Plant Vogtle Units 3 and 4, which reflects the increase in costs included in the revised base capital cost forecast for which Georgia Power did not seek rate recovery and costs included in the revised construction contingency estimate for which Georgia Power may seek rate recovery as and when such costs are appropriately included in the base capital cost forecast. See Note 2 to the financial statements under "Georgia Power – Nuclear Construction" for additional information.
Interest Expense, Net of Amounts Capitalized
In 2018, interest expense, net of amounts capitalized decreased $22 million, or 5.3%, compared to 2017 and increased $31 million, or 8.0%, compared to 2016 primarily due to changes in outstanding borrowings.
Other Income (Expense), Net
In 2018, other income (expense), net increased $11 million compared to the prior year primarily due to an increase in AFUDC equity of $29 million resulting from a higher AFUDC rate due to a higher equity ratio and lower short-term borrowings, partially offset by a decrease of $21 million associated with revenues and expenses, net primarily from unregulated sales of products and services. In 2018, these revenues and expenses are included in other revenues and other operations and maintenance expenses, respectively, as a result of the adoption of ASC 606. See Note 1 to the financial statements for additional information regarding Georgia Power's adoption of ASC 606.
In 2017, other income (expense), net increased $23 million compared to the prior year primarily due to a $28 million decrease in the non-service cost components of net periodic pension and other postretirement benefit costs, a $7 million increase in third party infrastructure services revenue, and a $6 million increase in wholesale operating fee revenue associated with contractual targets, partially offset by a $10 million increase in charitable donations and an $8 million decrease in AFUDC equity resulting from higher short-term borrowings. See Notes 1 under "Recently Adopted Accounting Standards" and 11 to the financial statements for additional information on Georgia Power's net periodic pension and other postretirement benefit costs.
Income Taxes
Income taxes decreased $616 million, or 74.2%, in 2018 compared to the prior year primarily due to a lower federal income tax rate as a result of the Tax Reform Legislation and the reduction in pre-tax earnings resulting from the estimated probable loss related to Plant Vogtle Units 3 and 4.
Income taxes increased $25$50 million, or 4.9%6.4%, in 2016 as2017 compared to the prior year primarily due to higher pre-tax earnings.earnings, partially offset by an adjustment related to the Tax Reform Legislation.
See Note 10 to the financial statements for additional information.
DividendsEnvironmental Accounting Order
Based on Preferredan order from the Alabama PSC (Environmental Accounting Order), Alabama Power is allowed to establish a regulatory asset to record the unrecovered investment costs, including the unrecovered plant asset balance and Preference Stockthe unrecovered costs associated with site removal and closure associated with future unit retirements caused by environmental regulations. The regulatory asset is being amortized and recovered over the affected unit's remaining useful life, as established prior to the decision regarding early retirement through Rate CNP Compliance. At December 31, 2018, this regulatory asset had a balance of $42 million. See "Environmental MattersEnvironmental Laws and Regulations" herein for additional information regarding environmental regulations.
DividendsSubsequent to December 31, 2018, Alabama Power determined that Plant Gorgas Units 8, 9, and 10 (approximately 1,000 MWs) will be retired by April 15, 2019 due to the expected costs of compliance with federal and state environmental regulations. In accordance with the Environmental Accounting Order, approximately $740 million of net investment costs will be transferred to a regulatory asset at the retirement date and recovered over the affected units' remaining useful lives, as established prior to the decision to retire.
Georgia Power
Georgia Power's revenues from regulated retail operations are collected through various rate mechanisms subject to the oversight of the Georgia PSC. Georgia Power currently recovers its costs from the regulated retail business through the 2013 ARP, which includes traditional base tariff rates, Demand-Side Management (DSM) tariffs, Environmental Compliance Cost Recovery (ECCR) tariffs, and Municipal Franchise Fee (MFF) tariffs. Georgia Power is scheduled to file a base rate case by July 1, 2019, which may continue or modify these tariffs. In addition, financing costs on certified construction costs of Plant Vogtle Units 3 and 4 are being collected through the NCCR tariff and fuel costs are collected through a separate fuel cost recovery tariff. See Note 2 to the financial statements under "Georgia Power" for additional information.
Rate Plans
Pursuant to the terms and conditions of a settlement agreement related to Southern Company's acquisition of Southern Company Gas approved by the Georgia PSC in 2016, the 2013 ARP will continue in effect until December 31, 2019, and Georgia Power will be required to file its next base rate case by July 1, 2019. Furthermore, through December 31, 2019, Georgia Power will retain its merger savings, net of transition costs, as defined in the settlement agreement; through December 31, 2022, such net merger savings will be shared on a 60/40 basis with customers; thereafter, all merger savings will be retained by customers. See Note 15 to the financial statements under "Southern Company Merger with Southern Company Gas" for additional information regarding the Merger.
There were no changes to Georgia Power's traditional base tariff rates, ECCR tariff, DSM tariffs, or MFF tariff in 2017 or 2018.
Under the 2013 ARP, Georgia Power's retail ROE is set at 10.95% and earnings are evaluated against a retail ROE range of 10.00% to 12.00%. Two-thirds of any earnings above 12.00% will be directly refunded to customers, with the remaining one-third retained by Georgia Power. There will be no recovery of any earnings shortfall below 10.00% on an actual basis. In 2016, Georgia Power's retail ROE exceeded 12.00%, and Georgia Power refunded to retail customers in 2018 approximately $40 million as approved by the Georgia PSC. On February 5, 2019, the Georgia PSC approved a settlement between Georgia Power and the staff

MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS (continued)
Southern Company and Subsidiary Companies 2018 Annual Report


of the Georgia PSC under which Georgia Power's retail ROE for 2017 was stipulated to exceed 12.00% and Georgia Power will reduce certain regulatory assets by approximately $4 million in lieu of providing refunds to retail customers. In 2018, Georgia Power's retail ROE exceeded 12.00%, and Georgia Power accrued approximately $100 million to refund to retail customers, subject to review and approval by the Georgia PSC.
On April 3, 2018, the Georgia PSC approved the Georgia Power Tax Reform Settlement Agreement. Pursuant to the Georgia Power Tax Reform Settlement Agreement, to reflect the federal income tax rate reduction impact of the Tax Reform Legislation, Georgia Power will refund to customers a total of $330 million through bill credits. Georgia Power issued bill credits of approximately $130 million in 2018 and will issue bill credits of approximately $95 million in June 2019 and $105 million in February 2020. In addition, Georgia Power is deferring as a regulatory liability (i) the revenue equivalent of the tax expense reduction resulting from legislation lowering the Georgia state income tax rate from 6.00% to 5.75% in 2019 and (ii) the entire benefit of federal and state excess accumulated deferred income taxes, which is expected to total approximately $700 million at December 31, 2019. At December 31, 2018, the related regulatory liability balance totaled $610 million. The amortization of these regulatory liabilities is expected to be addressed in the Georgia Power 2019 Base Rate Case. If there is not a base rate case in 2019, customers will receive $185 million in annual bill credits beginning in 2020, with any additional federal and state income tax savings deferred as a regulatory liability, until Georgia Power's next base rate case.
To address some of the negative cash flow and credit quality impacts of the Tax Reform Legislation, the Georgia PSC also approved an increase in Georgia Power's retail equity ratio to the lower of (i) Georgia Power's actual common equity weight in its capital structure or (ii) 55%, until the Georgia Power 2019 Base Rate Case. At December 31, 2018, Georgia Power's actual retail common equity ratio (on a 13-month average basis) was approximately 55%. Benefits from reduced federal income tax rates in excess of the amounts refunded to customers will be retained by Georgia Power to cover the carrying costs of the incremental equity in 2018 and 2019.
Integrated Resource Plan
See "Environmental Matters" herein for additional information regarding proposed and final EPA rules and regulations, including revisions to ELG for steam electric power plants and additional regulations of CCR and CO2.
In 2016, the Georgia PSC approved Georgia Power's triennial Integrated Resource Plan (2016 IRP) including the reclassification of the remaining net book value of Plant Mitchell Unit 3 and costs associated with materials and supplies remaining at the unit retirement date to a regulatory asset. Recovery of the unit's net book value will continue through December 31, 2019, as provided in the 2013 ARP. The timing of the recovery of the remaining balance of the unit's net book value as of December 31, 2019 and costs associated with materials and supplies remaining at the unit retirement date was deferred for consideration in the Georgia Power 2019 Base Rate Case.
In the 2016 IRP, the Georgia PSC also approved recovery of costs up to $99 million through June 30, 2019 to preserve nuclear generation as an option at a future generation site in Stewart County, Georgia. In March 2017, the Georgia PSC approved Georgia Power's decision to suspend work at the site due to changing economics, including lower load forecasts and fuel costs. The timing of recovery for costs incurred of approximately $50 million is expected to be determined by the Georgia PSC in the Georgia Power 2019 Base Rate Case.
On January 31, 2019, Georgia Power filed its triennial IRP (2019 IRP). The filing includes a request to decertify and retire Plant Hammond Units 1 through 4 (840 MWs) and Plant McIntosh Unit 1 (142.5 MWs) upon approval of the 2019 IRP.
In the 2019 IRP, Georgia Power requested approval to reclassify the remaining net book value of Plant Hammond Units 1 through 4 (approximately $520 million at December 31, 2018) upon retirement to a regulatory asset to be amortized ratably over a period equal to the applicable unit's remaining useful life through 2035. For Plant McIntosh Unit 1, Georgia Power requested approval to reclassify the remaining net book value (approximately $40 million at December 31, 2018) upon retirement to a regulatory asset to be amortized over a three-year period to be determined in the Georgia Power 2019 Base Rate Case. Georgia Power also requested approval to reclassify any unusable material and supplies inventory balances remaining at the applicable unit's retirement date to a regulatory asset for recovery over a period to be determined in the Georgia Power 2019 Base Rate Case.
The 2019 IRP also includes a request to certify approximately 25 MWs of capacity at Plant Scherer Unit 3 for the retail jurisdiction beginning January 1, 2020, following the expiration of a wholesale PPA.
The 2019 IRP also includes details regarding ARO costs associated with ash pond and landfill closures and post-closure care. Georgia Power requested the timing and rate of recovery of these costs be determined by the Georgia PSC in the Georgia Power 2019 Base Rate Case. See "Environmental Matters – Environmental Laws and Regulations – Coal Combustion Residuals" and FINANCIAL CONDITION AND LIQUIDITY – "Capital Requirements and Contractual Obligations" herein and Note 6 to the financial statements for additional information regarding Georgia Power's AROs.

MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS (continued)
Southern Company and Subsidiary Companies 2018 Annual Report


Georgia Power also requested approval to issue two capacity-based requests for proposals (RFP). If approved, the first capacity-based RFP will seek resources that can provide capacity beginning in 2022 or 2023 and the second capacity-based RFP will seek resources that can provide capacity beginning in 2026, 2027, or 2028. Additionally, the 2019 IRP includes a request to procure an additional 1,000 MWs of renewable resources through a competitive bidding process. Georgia Power also proposed to invest in a portfolio of up to 50 MWs of battery energy storage technologies.
A decision from the Georgia PSC on the 2019 IRP is expected in mid-2019.
The ultimate outcome of these matters cannot be determined at this time.
Storm Damage Recovery
Georgia Power is accruing $30 million annually through December 31, 2019, as provided in the 2013 ARP, for incremental operations and maintenance costs of damage from major storms to its transmission and distribution facilities. At December 31, 2018, the total balance in the regulatory asset related to storm damage was $416 million. During October 2018, Hurricane Michael caused significant damage to Georgia Power's transmission and distribution facilities. The incremental restoration costs related to this hurricane deferred in the regulatory asset for storm damage totaled approximately $115 million. Hurricanes Irma and Matthew also caused significant damage to Georgia Power's transmission and distribution facilities during September 2017 and October 2016, respectively. The incremental restoration costs related to Hurricanes Irma and Matthew deferred in Georgia Power's regulatory asset for storm damage totaled approximately $250 million. The rate of storm damage cost recovery is expected to be adjusted as part of the Georgia Power 2019 Base Rate Case and further adjusted in future regulatory proceedings as necessary. The ultimate outcome of this matter cannot be determined at this time. See Note 2 to the financial statements under "Georgia PowerStorm Damage Recovery" for additional information regarding Georgia Power's storm damage reserve.
Mississippi Power
Mississippi Power's retail base rates generally are set under the PEP, a rate plan approved by the Mississippi PSC. Two filings are made for each calendar year: the PEP projected filing, which is typically filed prior to the beginning of the year based on a projected revenue requirement, and the PEP lookback filing, which is filed after the end of the year and allows for review of the actual revenue requirement compared to the projected filing.
On February 7, 2018, Mississippi Power revised its annual projected PEP filing for 2018 to reflect the impacts of the Tax Reform Legislation. The revised filing requested an increase of $26 million in annual revenues, based on a performance adjusted ROE of 9.33% and an increased equity ratio of 55%. On July 27, 2018, Mississippi Power and the MPUS entered into a settlement agreement with respect to the 2018 PEP filing and all unresolved PEP filings for prior years (PEP Settlement Agreement), which was approved by the Mississippi PSC on August 7, 2018. Rates under the PEP Settlement Agreement became effective with the first billing cycle of September 2018. The PEP Settlement Agreement provides for an increase of approximately $21.6 million in annual base retail revenues, which excludes certain compensation costs contested by the MPUS, as well as approximately $2 million which was subsequently approved for recovery through Mississippi Power's 2018 Energy Efficiency Cost Rider.
Pursuant to the PEP Settlement Agreement, Mississippi Power's performance-adjusted allowed ROE is 9.31% and its allowed equity ratio is capped at 51%, pending further review by the Mississippi PSC. In lieu of the requested equity ratio increase, Mississippi Power retained $44 million of excess accumulated deferred income taxes resulting from the Tax Reform Legislation until the conclusion of Mississippi Power's next base rate case, which is scheduled to be filed in the fourth quarter 2019 (Mississippi Power 2019 Base Rate Case). Further, Mississippi Power agreed to seek equity contributions sufficient to restore its equity ratio to 50% by December 31, 2018.
Pursuant to the PEP Settlement Agreement, PEP proceedings are suspended until after the conclusion of the Mississippi Power 2019 Base Rate Case and Mississippi Power is not required to make any PEP filings for regulatory years 2018, 2019, and 2020. The PEP Settlement Agreement also resolved all open PEP filings with no change to customer rates.
Kemper County Energy Facility
In 2018, Mississippi Power recorded pre-tax charges to income of $37 million ($27 million after tax), primarily resulting from the abandonment and related closure activities and ongoing period costs, net of sales proceeds, for the mine and gasifier-related assets at the Kemper County energy facility. In addition, Mississippi Power recorded a credit to earnings of $95 million in the fourth quarter 2018 primarily resulting from the reduction of a valuation allowance for a state income tax net operating loss (NOL) carryforward associated with the Kemper County energy facility. Additional closure costs for the mine and gasifier-related assets, currently estimated at up to $10 million pre-tax (excluding salvage, net of dismantlement costs), may be incurred through the first half of 2020. In addition, period costs, including, but not limited to, costs for compliance and safety, ARO accretion, and property taxes for the mine and gasifier-related assets, are estimated to total $11 million in 2019 and $2 million to $4 million annually in

MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS (continued)
Southern Company and Subsidiary Companies 2018 Annual Report


2020 through 2023. Mississippi Power is currently evaluating its options regarding the final disposition of the CO2 pipeline, including removal of the pipeline. This evaluation is expected to be complete later in 2019. If Mississippi Power ultimately decides to remove the CO2 pipeline, the cost of removal could have a material impact on Southern Company's financial statements. The ultimate outcome of these matters cannot be determined at this time.
The combined cycle and associated common facilities portions of the Kemper County energy facility were dedicated as Plant Ratcliffe on April 27, 2018.
For additional information on the Kemper County energy facility, see Note 2 to the financial statements under "Mississippi PowerKemper County Energy Facility."
Reserve Margin Plan
On August 6, 2018, Mississippi Power filed its proposed Reserve Margin Plan (RMP), as required by the Mississippi PSC's order in the docket established for the purposes of pursuing a global settlement of the costs related to the Kemper County energy facility. Under the RMP, Mississippi Power proposed alternatives that would reduce its reserve margin, with the most economic of the alternatives being the two-year and seven-year acceleration of the retirement of Plant Watson Units 4 and 5, respectively, to the first quarter 2022 and the four-year acceleration of the retirement of Plant Greene County Units 1 and 2 to the third quarter 2021 and the third quarter 2022, respectively, in order to lower or avoid operating costs. The Plant Greene County unit retirements would require the completion by Alabama Power of proposed transmission and system reliability improvements, as well as agreement by Alabama Power. The RMP filing also states that, in the event the Mississippi PSC ultimately approves an alternative that includes an accelerated retirement, Mississippi Power would require authorization to defer in a regulatory asset for future recovery the remaining net book value of the units at the time of retirement. A decision by the Mississippi PSC that does not include recovery of the remaining book value of any generating units retired could have a material impact on Southern Company's financial statements. The ultimate outcome of this matter cannot be determined at this time.
Government Grants
In 2010, the DOE, through a cooperative agreement with SCS, agreed to fund $270 million of the Kemper County energy facility through the grants awarded to the project by the DOE under the Clean Coal Power Initiative Round 2. Through December 31, 2018, Mississippi Power received total DOE grants of $387 million, of which $382 million reduced the construction costs of the Kemper County energy facility and $5 million reimbursed Mississippi Power for expenses associated with DOE reporting. On December 12, 2018, Mississippi Power filed with the DOE its request for property closeout certification under the contract related to the grants received. Mississippi Power and the DOE are currently in discussions regarding the requested closeout and property disposition, which may require payment to the DOE for a portion of certain property that is to be retained by Mississippi Power. The ultimate outcome of this matter cannot be determined at this time; however, it could have a significant impact on Southern Company's financial statements.
Southern Company Gas
The natural gas distribution utilities are subject to regulation and oversight by their respective state regulatory agencies for the rates charged to their customers and other matters.
The natural gas market for Atlanta Gas Light was deregulated in 1997. Accordingly, Marketers, rather than a traditional utility, sell natural gas to end-use customers in Georgia and handle customer billing functions. Atlanta Gas Light earns revenue for its distribution services by charging rates to its customers based primarily on monthly fixed charges that are set by the Georgia PSC and adjusted periodically.
With the exception of Atlanta Gas Light, the natural gas distribution utilities are authorized by the relevant regulatory agencies in the states in which they serve to use natural gas cost recovery mechanisms that adjust rates to reflect changes in the wholesale cost of natural gas and ensure recovery of all costs prudently incurred in purchasing natural gas for customers. Natural gas cost recovery revenues are adjusted for differences in actual recoverable natural gas costs and amounts billed in current regulated rates. Changes in the billing factor will not have a significant effect on revenues or net income, but will affect cash flows. In addition to natural gas cost recovery mechanisms, there are other cost recovery mechanisms, such as regulatory riders, which vary by utility but allow recovery of certain costs, such as those related to infrastructure replacement programs, as well as environmental remediation and energy efficiency plans. See Note 1 to the financial statements under "Cost of Natural Gas" for additional information.

MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS (continued)
Southern Company and Subsidiary Companies 2018 Annual Report


Infrastructure Replacement Programs and Capital Projects
In addition to capital expenditures recovered through base rates by each of the natural gas distribution utilities, Nicor Gas and Virginia Natural Gas have separate rate riders that provide timely recovery of capital expenditures for specific infrastructure replacement programs. These infrastructure replacement programs and capital projects are risk-based and designed to update and replace cast iron, bare steel, and mid-vintage plastic materials or expand the natural gas distribution systems to improve reliability and meet operational flexibility and growth. The total expected investment under the infrastructure replacement programs for 2019 is $408 million. See Note 2 to the financial statements under "Southern Company GasInfrastructure Replacement Programs and Capital Projects" for additional information.
Rate Proceedings
On February 23, 2018, Atlanta Gas Light revised its annual base rate filing to reflect the impacts of the Tax Reform Legislation and requested a $16 million rate reduction in 2018. On May 15, 2018, the Georgia PSC approved a stipulation for Atlanta Gas Light's annual base rates to remain at the 2017 level for 2018 and 2019, with customer credits of $8 million in each of July 2018 and October 2018 to reflect the impacts of the Tax Reform Legislation. The Georgia PSC maintained Atlanta Gas Light's previously authorized earnings band based on a ROE between 10.55% and 10.95% and increased the allowed equity ratio by 4% to an equity ratio of 55% to address the negative cash flow and credit metric impacts of the Tax Reform Legislation. Additionally, Atlanta Gas Light is required to file a traditional base rate case on or before June 1, 2019 for rates effective January 1, 2020.
On January 31, 2018, the Illinois Commission approved a $137 million increase in Nicor Gas' annual base rate revenues, including $93 million related to the recovery of investments under Nicor Gas' infrastructure program, effective February 8, 2018, based on a ROE of 9.8%.
On May 2, 2018, the Illinois Commission approved Nicor Gas' rehearing request for revised base rates to incorporate the reduction in the federal income tax rate as a result of the Tax Reform Legislation. The resulting decrease of approximately $44 million in annual base rate revenues became effective May 5, 2018. Nicor Gas' previously-authorized capital structure and ROE of 9.80% were not addressed in the rehearing and remain unchanged. On November 9, 2018, Nicor Gas filed a general base rate case with the Illinois Commission requesting a $230 million increase in annual base rate revenues. The requested increase is based on a projected test year for the 12-month period ending September 30, 2020, a ROE of 10.6%, and an increase in the equity ratio from 52.0% to 54.0% to address the negative cash flow and credit metric impacts of the Tax Reform Legislation. The Illinois Commission is expected to rule on the requested increase within the 11-month statutory time limit, after which rate adjustments will be effective. The ultimate outcome of this matter cannot be determined at this time.
Fuel Cost Recovery
The traditional electric operating companies each have established fuel cost recovery rates approved by their respective state PSCs. Fuel cost recovery revenues are adjusted for differences in actual recoverable fuel costs and amounts billed in current regulated rates. Accordingly, changes in the billing factor will not have a significant effect on Southern Company's revenues or net income, but will affect cash flow. The traditional electric operating companies continuously monitor their under or over recovered fuel cost balances and make appropriate filings with their state PSCs to adjust fuel cost recovery rates as necessary.
See Note 1 to the financial statements under "Revenues" and Note 2 to the financial statements under "Alabama PowerRate ECR," "Georgia PowerFuel Cost Recovery," and "Mississippi PowerFuel Cost Recovery" for additional information.
Construction Program
Overview
The subsidiary companies of Southern Company are engaged in continuous construction programs to accommodate existing and estimated future loads on their respective systems. The Southern Company system intends to continue its strategy of developing and constructing new electric generating facilities, adding environmental modifications to certain existing units, expanding and improving the electric transmission and distribution systems, and updating and expanding the natural gas distribution systems. For the traditional electric operating companies, major generation construction projects are subject to state PSC approval in order to be included in retail rates. While Southern Power generally constructs and acquires generation assets covered by long-term PPAs, any uncontracted capacity could negatively affect future earnings. Southern Company Gas is engaged in various infrastructure improvement programs designed to update or expand the natural gas distribution systems of the natural gas distribution utilities to improve reliability and meet operational flexibility and growth. The natural gas distribution utilities recover their investment and a return associated with these infrastructure programs through their regulated rates. See Note 15 to the financial statements under "Southern Power" for additional information about costs relating to Southern Power's acquisitions that involve construction of renewable energy facilities and Note 2 to the financial statements under "Southern Company GasInfrastructure Replacement

MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS (continued)
Southern Company and Subsidiary Companies 2018 Annual Report


Programs and Capital Projects" for additional information regarding infrastructure improvement programs at the natural gas distribution utilities.
The Southern Company system's construction program is currently estimated to total approximately $8.0 billion, $7.7 billion, $6.7 billion, $6.3 billion, and $6.0 billion for 2019, 2020, 2021, 2022, and 2023, respectively. The largest construction project currently underway in the Southern Company system is Plant Vogtle Units 3 and 4 (45.7% ownership interest by Georgia Power in the two units, each with approximately 1,100 MWs). See FINANCIAL CONDITION AND LIQUIDITY – "Capital Requirements and Contractual Obligations" herein for additional information regarding Southern Company's capital requirements for its subsidiaries' construction programs.
Nuclear Construction
In 2009, the Georgia PSC certified construction of Plant Vogtle Units 3 and 4. Georgia Power holds a 45.7% ownership interest in Plant Vogtle Units 3 and 4. In 2012, the NRC issued the related combined construction and operating licenses, which allowed full construction of the two AP1000 nuclear units (with electric generating capacity of approximately 1,100 MWs each) and related facilities to begin. Until March 2017, construction on Plant Vogtle Units 3 and 4 continued under the Vogtle 3 and 4 Agreement, which was a substantially fixed price agreement. In March 2017, the EPC Contractor filed for bankruptcy protection under Chapter 11 of the U.S. Bankruptcy Code.
In connection with the EPC Contractor's bankruptcy filing, Georgia Power, acting for itself and as agent for the Vogtle Owners, entered into the Interim Assessment Agreement with the EPC Contractor to allow construction to continue. The Interim Assessment Agreement expired in July 2017 when Georgia Power, acting for itself and as agent for the other Vogtle Owners, and the EPC Contractor entered into the Vogtle Services Agreement. Under the Vogtle Services Agreement, Westinghouse provides facility design and engineering services, procurement and technical support, and staff augmentation on a time and materials cost basis. The Vogtle Services Agreement provides that it will continue until the start-up and testing of Plant Vogtle Units 3 and 4 are complete and electricity is generated and sold from both units. The Vogtle Services Agreement is terminable by the Vogtle Owners upon 30 days' written notice.
In October 2017, Georgia Power, acting for itself and as agent for the other Vogtle Owners, executed the Bechtel Agreement, a cost reimbursable plus fee arrangement, whereby Bechtel is reimbursed for actual costs plus a base fee and an at-risk fee, which is subject to adjustment based on Bechtel's performance against cost and schedule targets. Each Vogtle Owner is severally (not jointly) liable for its proportionate share, based on its ownership interest, of all amounts owed to Bechtel under the Bechtel Agreement. The Vogtle Owners may terminate the Bechtel Agreement at any time for their convenience, provided that the Vogtle Owners will be required to pay amounts related to work performed prior to the termination (including the applicable portion of the base fee), certain termination-related costs, and, at certain stages of the work, the applicable portion of the at-risk fee. Bechtel may terminate the Bechtel Agreement under certain circumstances, including certain Vogtle Owner suspensions of work, certain breaches of the Bechtel Agreement by the Vogtle Owners, Vogtle Owner insolvency, and certain other events. Pursuant to the Loan Guarantee Agreement between Georgia Power and the DOE, Georgia Power is required to obtain the DOE's approval of the Bechtel Agreement prior to obtaining any further advances under the Loan Guarantee Agreement.
Cost and Schedule
Georgia Power's approximate proportionate share of the remaining estimated capital cost to complete Plant Vogtle Units 3 and 4 by the expected in-service dates of November 2021 and November 2022, respectively, is as follows:
 (in billions)
Base project capital cost forecast(a)(b)
$8.0
Construction contingency estimate0.4
Total project capital cost forecast(a)(b)
8.4
Net investment as of December 31, 2018(b)
(4.6)
Remaining estimate to complete(a)
$3.8
(a)Excludes financing costs expected to be capitalized through AFUDC of approximately $315 million.
(b)Net of $1.7 billion received from Toshiba under the Guarantee Settlement Agreement and approximately $188 million in related Customer Refunds.
Georgia Power estimates that its financing costs for construction of Plant Vogtle Units 3 and 4 will total approximately $3.1 billion, of which $1.9 billion had been incurred through December 31, 2018.
As construction continues, challenges with management of contractors, subcontractors, and vendors; labor productivity, availability, and/or cost escalation; procurement, fabrication, delivery, assembly, and/or installation and testing, including any

MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS (continued)
Southern Company and Subsidiary Companies 2018 Annual Report


required engineering changes, of plant systems, structures, and components (some of which are based on new technology that only recently began initial operation in the global nuclear industry at this scale); or other issues could arise and change the projected schedule and estimated cost. Monthly construction production targets required to maintain the current project schedule will continue to increase significantly throughout 2019. To meet these increasing monthly targets, existing craft construction productivity must improve and additional craft laborers must be retained and deployed.
Georgia Power and Southern Nuclear believe it is a leading practice in connection with a construction project of this size and complexity to periodically validate recent construction progress in comparison to the projected schedule and to verify and update quantities of commodities remaining to install, labor productivity, and forecasted staffing needs. This verification process, led by Southern Nuclear, was underway as of December 31, 2018 and is expected to be completed during the second quarter 2019. Georgia Power currently does not anticipate any material changes to the total estimated project capital cost forecast for Plant Vogtle Units 3 and 4 or the expected in-service dates of November 2021 and November 2022, respectively, resulting from this verification process. However, the ultimate impact on cost and schedule, if any, will not be known until the verification process is completed. Georgia Power is required to report the results and any project impacts to the Georgia PSC by May 15, 2019.
There have been technical and procedural challenges to the construction and licensing of Plant Vogtle Units 3 and 4 at the federal and state level and additional challenges may arise. Processes are in place that are designed to assure compliance with the requirements specified in the Westinghouse Design Control Document and the combined construction and operating licenses, including inspections by Southern Nuclear and the NRC that occur throughout construction. As a result of such compliance processes, certain license amendment requests have been filed and approved or are pending before the NRC. Various design and other licensing-based compliance matters, including the timely resolution of ITAAC and the related approvals by the NRC, may arise, which may result in additional license amendments or require other resolution. If any license amendment requests or other licensing-based compliance issues are not resolved in a timely manner, there may be delays in the project schedule that could result in increased costs.
The ultimate outcome of these matters cannot be determined at this time. However, any extension of the project schedule is currently estimated to result in additional base capital costs of approximately $50 million per month, based on Georgia Power's ownership interests, and AFUDC of approximately $12 million per month. While Georgia Power is not precluded from seeking recovery of any future capital cost forecast increase, management will ultimately determine whether or not to seek recovery. Any further changes to the capital cost forecast that are not expected to be recoverable through regulated rates will be required to be charged to income and such charges could be material.
Joint Owner Contracts
In November 2017, the Vogtle Owners entered into an amendment to their joint ownership agreements for Plant Vogtle Units 3 and 4 to provide for, among other conditions, additional Vogtle Owner approval requirements. Effective August 31, 2018, the Vogtle Owners further amended the joint ownership agreements to clarify and provide procedures for certain provisions of the joint ownership agreements related to adverse events that require the vote of the holders of at least 90% of the ownership interests in Plant Vogtle Units 3 and 4 to continue construction (as amended, and together with the November 2017 amendment, the Vogtle Joint Ownership Agreements). The Vogtle Joint Ownership Agreements also confirm that the Vogtle Owners' sole recourse against Georgia Power or Southern Nuclear for any action or inaction in connection with their performance as agent for the Vogtle Owners is limited to removal of Georgia Power and/or Southern Nuclear as agent, except in cases of willful misconduct.
As a result of the increase in the total project capital cost forecast and Georgia Power's decision not to seek rate recovery of the increase in the base capital costs as described below, the holders of at least 90% of the ownership interests in Plant Vogtle Units 3 and 4 were required to vote to continue construction. On September 26, 2018, the Vogtle Owners unanimously voted to continue construction of Plant Vogtle Units 3 and 4.
Amendments to the Vogtle Joint Ownership Agreements
In connection with the vote to continue construction, Georgia Power entered into (i) the Vogtle Owner Term Sheet with the other Vogtle Owners and MEAG's wholly-owned subsidiaries MEAG SPVJ, MEAG Power SPVM, LLC (MEAG SPVM), and MEAG Power SPVP, LLC (MEAG SPVP) to take certain actions which partially mitigate potential financial exposure for the other Vogtle Owners, including additional amendments to the Vogtle Joint Ownership Agreements and the purchase of PTCs from the other Vogtle Owners, and (ii) the MEAG Term Sheet with MEAG and MEAG SPVJ to provide funding with respect to MEAG SPVJ's ownership interest in Plant Vogtle Units 3 and 4 (Project J) under certain circumstances. On January 14, 2019, Georgia Power, MEAG, and MEAG SPVJ entered into an agreement to implement the provisions of the MEAG Term Sheet (MEAG Funding Agreement). On February 18, 2019, Georgia Power, the other Vogtle Owners, and MEAG's wholly-owned subsidiaries MEAG SPVJ, MEAG SPVM, and MEAG SPVP entered into certain amendments to the Vogtle Joint Ownership Agreements to implement the provisions of the Vogtle Owner Term Sheet (Global Amendments).

MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS (continued)
Southern Company and Subsidiary Companies 2018 Annual Report


Pursuant to the Global Amendments, and consistent with the Vogtle Owner Term Sheet, the Vogtle Joint Ownership Agreements were modified as follows: (i) each Vogtle Owner must pay its proportionate share of qualifying construction costs for Plant Vogtle Units 3 and 4 based on its ownership percentage up to the estimated cost at completion (EAC) for Plant Vogtle Units 3 and 4 which formed the basis of Georgia Power's forecast of $8.4 billion in the nineteenth VCM plus $800 million; (ii) Georgia Power will be responsible for 55.7% of actual qualifying construction costs between $800 million and $1.6 billion over the EAC in the nineteenth VCM (resulting in $80 million of potential additional costs to Georgia Power), with the remaining Vogtle Owners responsible for 44.3% of such costs pro rata in accordance with their respective ownership interests; and (iii) Georgia Power will be responsible for 65.7% of qualifying construction costs between $1.6 billion and $2.1 billion over the EAC in the nineteenth VCM (resulting in a further $100 million of potential additional costs to Georgia Power), with the remaining Vogtle Owners responsible for 34.3% of such costs pro rata in accordance with their respective ownership interests.
If the EAC is revised and exceeds the EAC in the nineteenth VCM by more than $2.1 billion, each of the other Vogtle Owners will have a one-time option at the time the project budget forecast is so revised to tender a portion of its ownership interest to Georgia Power in exchange for Georgia Power's agreement to pay 100% of such Vogtle Owner's remaining share of total construction costs in excess of the EAC in the nineteenth VCM plus $2.1 billion. In this event, Georgia Power will have the option of cancelling the project in lieu of purchasing a portion of the ownership interest of any other Vogtle Owner. If Georgia Power accepts the offer to purchase a portion of another Vogtle Owner's ownership interest in Plant Vogtle Units 3 and 4, the ownership interest(s) to be conveyed from the tendering Vogtle Owner(s) to Georgia Power will be calculated based on the proportion of the cumulative amount of construction costs paid by each such tendering Vogtle Owner(s) and by Georgia Power as of the COD of Plant Vogtle Unit 4. For purposes of this calculation, payments made by Georgia Power on behalf of another Vogtle Owner in accordance with the second and third items described in the paragraph above will be treated as payments made by the applicable Vogtle Owner.
In the event the actual costs of construction at completion of a Unit are less than the EAC reflected in the nineteenth VCM report and such Unit is placed in service in accordance with the schedule projected in the nineteenth VCM report (i.e., Plant Vogtle Unit 3 is placed in service by November 2021 or Plant Vogtle Unit 4 is placed in service by November 2022), Georgia Power will be entitled to 60.7% of the cost savings with respect to the relevant Unit and the remaining Vogtle Owners will be entitled to 39.3% of such savings on a pro rata basis in accordance with their respective ownership interests.
For purposes of the foregoing provisions, qualifying construction costs will not include costs (i) resulting from force majeure events, including governmental actions or inactions (or significant delays associated with issuance of such actions) that affect the licensing, completion, start-up, operations, or financing of Plant Vogtle Units 3 and 4, administrative proceedings or litigation regarding ITAAC or other regulatory challenges to commencement of operation of Plant Vogtle Units 3 and 4, and changes in laws or regulations governing Plant Vogtle Units 3 and 4, (ii) legal fees and legal expenses incurred due to litigation with contractors or subcontractors that are not subsidiaries or affiliates of Southern Company, and (iii) additional costs caused by requests from the Vogtle Owners other than Georgia Power, except for the exercise of a right to vote granted under the Vogtle Joint Ownership Agreements, that increase costs by $100,000 or more.
Pursuant to the Global Amendments, and consistent with the Vogtle Owner Term Sheet, the provisions of the Vogtle Joint Ownership Agreements requiring that Vogtle Owners holding 90% of the ownership interests in Plant Vogtle Units 3 and 4 vote to continue construction following certain adverse events (Project Adverse Events) were modified. Pursuant to the Global Amendments, the holders of at least 90% of the ownership interests in Plant Vogtle Units 3 and 4 must vote to continue construction if certain Project Adverse Events occur, including: (i) the bankruptcy of Toshiba; (ii) the termination or rejection in bankruptcy of certain agreements, including the Vogtle Services Agreement, the Bechtel Agreement, or the agency agreement with Southern Nuclear; (iii) Georgia Power publicly announces its intention not to submit for rate recovery any portion of its investment in Plant Vogtle Units 3 and 4 or the Georgia PSC determines that any of Georgia Power's costs relating to the construction of Plant Vogtle Units 3 and 4 will not be recovered in retail rates, excluding any additional amounts paid by Georgia Power on behalf of the other Vogtle Owners pursuant to the Global Amendments described above and the first 6% of costs during any six-month VCM reporting period that are disallowed by the Georgia PSC for recovery, or for which Georgia Power elects not to seek cost recovery, through retail rates; and (iv) an incremental extension of one year or more over the most recently approved schedule. Under the Global Amendments, Georgia Power may cancel the project at any time in its sole discretion.
In addition, pursuant to the Vogtle Joint Ownership Agreements, the required approval of holders of ownership interests in Plant Vogtle Units 3 and 4 is at least (i) 90% for a change of the primary construction contractor and (ii) 67% for material amendments to the Vogtle Services Agreement or agreements with Southern Nuclear or the primary construction contractor, including the Bechtel Agreement.
The Global Amendments provide that if the holders of at least 90% of the ownership interests fail to vote in favor of continuing the project following any future Project Adverse Event, work on Plant Vogtle Units 3 and 4 will continue for a period of 30 days if

MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS (continued)
Southern Company and Subsidiary Companies 2018 Annual Report


the holders of more than 50% of the ownership interests vote in favor of continuing construction (Majority Voting Owners). In such a case, the Vogtle Owners (i) have agreed to negotiate in good faith towards the resumption of the project, (ii) if no agreement is reached during such 30-day period, the project will be cancelled, and (iii) in the event of such a cancellation, the Majority Voting Owners will be obligated to reimburse any other Vogtle Owner for the incremental costs it incurred during such 30-day negotiation period.
Purchase of PTCs During Commercial Operation
Pursuant to the Global Amendments, and consistent with the Vogtle Owner Term Sheet, Georgia Power has agreed to purchase additional PTCs from OPC, Dalton, MEAG SPVM, MEAG SPVP, and MEAG SPVJ (to the extent any MEAG SPVJ PTC rights remain after any purchases required under the MEAG Funding Agreement as described below) at varying purchase prices dependent upon the actual cost to complete construction of Plant Vogtle Units 3 and 4 as compared to the EAC reflected in the nineteenth VCM report. The purchases are at the option of the applicable Vogtle Owner.
Potential Funding to MEAG Project J
Pursuant to the MEAG Funding Agreement, and consistent with the MEAG Term Sheet, if MEAG SPVJ is unable to make its payments due under the Vogtle Joint Ownership Agreements solely as a result of the occurrence of one of the following situations that materially impedes access to capital markets for MEAG for Project J: (i) the conduct of JEA or the City of Jacksonville, such as JEA's legal challenges of its obligations under a PPA with MEAG (PPA-J), or (ii) PPA-J is declared void by a court of competent jurisdiction or rejected by JEA under the applicable provisions of the U.S. Bankruptcy Code (each of (i) and (ii), a JEA Default), at MEAG's request, Georgia Power will purchase from MEAG SPVJ the rights to PTCs attributable to MEAG SPVJ's share of Plant Vogtle Units 3 and 4 (approximately 206 MWs) within 30 days of such request at varying prices dependent upon the stage of construction of Plant Vogtle Units 3 and 4. The aggregate purchase price of the PTCs, together with any advances made as described in the next paragraph, shall not exceed $300 million.
At the option of MEAG, as an alternative or supplement to Georgia Power's purchase of PTCs as described above, Georgia Power has agreed to provide up to $250 million in funding to MEAG for Project J in the form of advances (either advances under the Vogtle Joint Ownership Agreements or the purchase of MEAG Project J bonds, at the discretion of Georgia Power), subject to any required approvals of the Georgia PSC and the DOE.
In the event MEAG SPVJ certifies to Georgia Power that it is unable to fund its obligations under the Vogtle Joint Ownership Agreements as a result of a JEA Default and Georgia Power becomes obligated to provide funding as described above, MEAG is required to (i) assign to Georgia Power its right to vote on any future Project Adverse Event and (ii) diligently pursue JEA for its breach of PPA-J. In addition, Georgia Power agreed that it will not sue MEAG for any amounts due from MEAG SPVJ under MEAG's guarantee of MEAG SPVJ's obligations so long as MEAG SPVJ complies with the terms of the MEAG Funding Agreement as to its payment obligations and the other non-payment provisions of the Vogtle Joint Ownership Agreements.
Under the terms of the MEAG Funding Agreement, Georgia Power may cancel the project in lieu of providing funding in the form of advances or PTC purchases.
The ultimate outcome of these matters cannot be determined at this time.
Regulatory Matters
In 2009, the Georgia PSC voted to certify construction of Plant Vogtle Units 3 and 4 with a certified capital cost of $4.418 billion. In addition, in 2009 the Georgia PSC approved inclusion of the Plant Vogtle Units 3 and 4 related CWIP accounts in rate base, and the State of Georgia enacted the Georgia Nuclear Energy Financing Act, which allows Georgia Power to recover financing costs for Plant Vogtle Units 3 and 4. Financing costs are recovered on all applicable certified costs through annual adjustments to the NCCR tariff up to the certified capital cost of $4.418 billion. At December 31, 2018, Georgia Power had recovered approximately $1.9 billion of financing costs. Financing costs related to capital costs above $4.418 billion will be recovered through AFUDC; however, Georgia Power will not record AFUDC related to any capital costs in excess of the total deemed reasonable by the Georgia PSC (currently $7.3 billion) and not requested for rate recovery. On December 18, 2018, the Georgia PSC approved Georgia Power's request to increase the NCCR tariff by $88 million annually, effective January 1, 2019.
Georgia Power is required to file semi-annual VCM reports with the Georgia PSC by February 28 and August 31 of each year. In 2013, in connection with the eighth VCM report, the Georgia PSC approved a stipulation between Georgia Power and the staff of the Georgia PSC to waive the requirement to amend the Plant Vogtle Units 3 and 4 certificate in accordance with the 2009 certification order until the completion of Plant Vogtle Unit 3, or earlier if deemed appropriate by the Georgia PSC and Georgia Power.

MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS (continued)
Southern Company and Subsidiary Companies 2018 Annual Report


In 2016, the Georgia PSC voted to approve a settlement agreement (Vogtle Cost Settlement Agreement) resolving certain prudency matters in connection with the fifteenth VCM report. In December 2017, the Georgia PSC voted to approve (and issued its related order on January 11, 2018) Georgia Power's seventeenth VCM report, which included a recommendation to continue construction with Southern Nuclear as project manager and Bechtel serving as the primary construction contractor, and modified the Vogtle Cost Settlement Agreement. The Vogtle Cost Settlement Agreement, as modified by the January 11, 2018 order, resolved the following regulatory matters related to Plant Vogtle Units 3 and 4: (i) none of the $3.3 billion of costs incurred through December 31, 2015 and reflected in the fourteenth VCM report should be disallowed from rate base on the basis of imprudence; (ii) the Contractor Settlement Agreement was reasonable and prudent and none of the amounts paid pursuant to the Contractor Settlement Agreement should be disallowed from rate base on the basis of imprudence; (iii) (a) capital costs incurred up to $5.68 billion would be presumed to be reasonable and prudent with the burden of proof on any party challenging such costs, (b) Georgia Power would have the burden to show that any capital costs above $5.68 billion were prudent, and (c) a revised capital cost forecast of $7.3 billion (after reflecting the impact of payments received under the Guarantee Settlement Agreement and related Customer Refunds) was found reasonable; (iv) construction of Plant Vogtle Units 3 and 4 should be completed, with Southern Nuclear serving as project manager and Bechtel as primary contractor; (v) approved and deemed reasonable Georgia Power's revised schedule placing Plant Vogtle Units 3 and 4 in service in November 2021 and November 2022, respectively; (vi) confirmed that the revised cost forecast does not represent a cost cap and that prudence decisions on cost recovery will be made at a later date, consistent with applicable Georgia law; (vii) reduced the ROE used to calculate the NCCR tariff (a) from 10.95% (the ROE rate setting point authorized by the Georgia PSC in the 2013 ARP) to 10.00% effective January 1, 2016, (b) from 10.00% to 8.30%, effective January 1, 2020, and (c) from 8.30% to 5.30%, effective January 1, 2021 (provided that the ROE in no case will be less than Georgia Power's average cost of long-term debt); (viii) reduced the ROE used for AFUDC equity for Plant Vogtle Units 3 and 4 from 10.00% to Georgia Power's average cost of long-term debt, effective January 1, 2018; and (ix) agreed that upon Unit 3 reaching commercial operation, retail base rates would be adjusted to include carrying costs on those capital costs deemed prudent in the Vogtle Cost Settlement Agreement. The January 11, 2018 order also stated that if Plant Vogtle Units 3 and 4 are not commercially operational by June 1, 2021 and June 1, 2022, respectively, the ROE used to calculate the NCCR tariff will be further reduced by 10 basis points each month (but not lower than Georgia Power's average cost of long-term debt) until the respective Unit is commercially operational. The ROE reductions negatively impacted earnings by approximately $100 million, $25 million, and $20 million in 2018, 2017, and 2016, respectively, and are estimated to have negative earnings impacts of approximately $75 million in 2019 and an aggregate of approximately $615 million from 2020 to 2022.
In its January 11, 2018 order, the Georgia PSC also stated if other conditions change and assumptions upon which Georgia Power's seventeenth VCM report are based do not materialize, the Georgia PSC reserved the right to reconsider the decision to continue construction.
On February 12, 2018, Georgia Interfaith Power & Light, Inc. (GIPL) and Partnership for Southern Equity, Inc. (PSE) filed a petition appealing the Georgia PSC's January 11, 2018 order with the Fulton County Superior Court. On March 8, 2018, Georgia Watch filed a similar appeal to the Fulton County Superior Court for judicial review of the Georgia PSC's decision and denial of Georgia Watch's motion for reconsideration. On December 21, 2018, the Fulton County Superior Court granted Georgia Power's motion to dismiss the two appeals. On January 9, 2019, GIPL, PSE, and Georgia Watch filed an appeal of this decision with the Georgia Court of Appeals. Georgia Power believes the appeal has no merit; however, an adverse outcome in the appeal combined with subsequent adverse action by the Georgia PSC could have a material impact on Southern Company's results of operations, financial condition, and liquidity.
In preparation for its nineteenth VCM filing, Georgia Power requested Southern Nuclear to perform a full cost reforecast for the project. This reforecast, performed prior to the nineteenth VCM filing, resulted in a $0.7 billion increase to the base capital cost forecast reported in the second quarter 2018. This base cost increase primarily resulted from changed assumptions related to the finalization of contract scopes and management responsibilities for Bechtel and over 60 subcontractors, labor productivity rates, and craft labor incentives, as well as the related levels of project management, oversight, and support, including field supervision and engineering support.
Although Georgia Power believes these incremental costs are reasonable and necessary to complete the project and the Georgia PSC's order in the seventeenth VCM proceeding specifically states that the construction of Plant Vogtle Units 3 and 4 is not subject to a cost cap, Georgia Power did not seek rate recovery for these cost increases included in the current base capital cost forecast (or any related financing costs) in the nineteenth VCM report. In connection with future VCM filings, Georgia Power may request the Georgia PSC to evaluate costs currently included in the construction contingency estimate for rate recovery as and when they are appropriately included in the base capital cost forecast. After considering the significant level of uncertainty that exists regarding the future recoverability of costs included in the construction contingency estimate since the ultimate outcome of these matters is subject to the outcome of future assessments by management, as well as Georgia PSC decisions in these future regulatory proceedings, Georgia Power recorded a total pre-tax charge to income of $1.1 billion ($0.8 billion after

MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS (continued)
Southern Company and Subsidiary Companies 2018 Annual Report


tax) in the second quarter 2018, which includes the total increase in the base capital cost forecast and construction contingency estimate.
On August 31, 2018, Georgia Power filed its nineteenth VCM report with the Georgia PSC, which requested approval of $578 million of construction capital costs incurred from January 1, 2018 through June 30, 2018. On February 19, 2019, the Georgia PSC approved the nineteenth VCM, but deferred approval of $51.6 million of expenditures related to Georgia Power's portion of an administrative claim filed in the Westinghouse bankruptcy proceedings. Through the nineteenth VCM, the Georgia PSC has approved total construction capital costs incurred through June 30, 2018 of $5.4 billion (before $1.7 billion of payments received under the Guarantee Settlement Agreement and approximately $188 million in related Customer Refunds). In addition, the staff of the Georgia PSC requested, and Georgia Power agreed, to file its twentieth VCM report concurrently with the twenty-first VCM report by August 31, 2019.
The ultimate outcome of these matters cannot be determined at this time.
DOE Financing
At December 31, 2018, Georgia Power had borrowed $2.6 billion related to Plant Vogtle Units 3 and 4 costs through the Loan Guarantee Agreement and a multi-advance credit facility among Georgia Power, the DOE, and the FFB, which provides for borrowings of up to $3.46 billion, subject to the satisfaction of certain conditions. In September 2017, the DOE issued a conditional commitment to Georgia Power for up to approximately $1.67 billion in additional guaranteed loans under the Loan Guarantee Agreement. In September 2018, the DOE extended the conditional commitment to March 31, 2019. Any further extension must be approved by the DOE. Final approval and issuance of these additional loan guarantees by the DOE cannot be assured and are subject to the negotiation of definitive agreements, completion of due diligence by the DOE, receipt of any necessary regulatory approvals, and satisfaction of other conditions. See Note 8 to the financial statements under "Long-term DebtDOE Loan Guarantee Borrowings" for additional information, including applicable covenants, events of default, mandatory prepayment events (including any decision not to continue construction of Plant Vogtle Units 3 and 4), and conditions to borrowing.
The ultimate outcome of these matters cannot be determined at this time.
Income Tax Matters
Federal Tax Reform Legislation
In December 2017, the Tax Reform Legislation was signed into law and became effective on January 1, 2018. The Tax Reform Legislation, among other things, reduced the federal corporate income tax rate to 21%, retained normalization provisions for public utility property and existing renewable energy incentives, and repealed the corporate alternative minimum tax. In addition, under the Tax Reform Legislation, NOLs generated after December 31, 2017 can no longer be carried back to previous tax years but can be carried forward indefinitely, with utilization limited to 80% of taxable income of the subsequent tax year. The projected reduction of the consolidated income tax liability resulting from the tax rate reduction also delays the expected utilization of existing tax credit carryforwards.
Following the enactment of the Tax Reform Legislation, the SEC staff issued Staff Accounting Bulletin 118 – "Income Tax Accounting Implications of the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act" (SAB 118), which provided for a measurement period of up to one year from the enactment date to complete accounting under GAAP for the tax effects of the legislation. Due to the complex and comprehensive nature of the enacted tax law changes and their application under GAAP, Southern Company considered all amounts recorded in the financial statements as a result of the Tax Reform Legislation "provisional" as discussed in SAB 118 and subject to revision prior to filing its 2017 tax return in the fourth quarter 2018. Southern Company recognized tax benefits of $30 million and $264 million in 2018 and 2017, respectively, for a total net tax benefit of $294 million as a result of the Tax Reform Legislation. In addition, in total, Southern Company recorded a $417 million decrease in regulatory assets and a $6.2 billion increase in regulatory liabilities as a result of the Tax Reform Legislation and $16 million of stranded excess deferred tax balances in AOCI at December 31, 2017 were adjusted through retained earnings in 2018. As of December 31, 2018, Southern Company considered the measurement of impacts from the Tax Reform Legislation on deferred income tax assets and liabilities, primarily due to the impact of the reduction of the corporate income tax rate, to be complete.
However, the IRS continues to issue regulations that provide further interpretation and guidance on the law and each state's adoption of the provisions contained in the Tax Reform Legislation remains uncertain. In addition, the regulatory treatment of certain impacts of the Tax Reform Legislation is subject to the discretion of the FERC and each state's regulatory commission. The ultimate impact of these matters cannot be determined at this time. See Note 2 to the financial statements for additional information regarding the traditional electric operating companies' and the natural gas distribution utilities' rate filings, including

MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS (continued)
Southern Company and Subsidiary Companies 2018 Annual Report


amounts returned to customers during 2018, to reflect the impacts of the Tax Reform Legislation. Also see FINANCIAL CONDITION AND LIQUIDITY – "Credit Rating Risk" herein and Note 10 to the financial statements under "Current and Deferred Income Taxes" for additional information.
Bonus Depreciation
Under the Tax Reform Legislation, projects with binding contracts prior to September 28, 2017 and placed in service after September 27, 2017 remain eligible for bonus depreciation under the PATH Act. The PATH Act allowed for 50% bonus depreciation for 2015 through 2017, 40% bonus depreciation for 2018, and 30% bonus depreciation for 2019 and certain long-lived assets placed in service in 2020. Based on provisional estimates, bonus depreciation is expected to result in positive cash flows of approximately $300 million for the 2018 tax year and approximately $130 million for the 2019 tax year. The ultimate outcome of this matter cannot be determined at this time.
Tax Credits
The Tax Reform Legislation retained the renewable energy incentives that were included in the PATH Act. The PATH Act allows for 30% ITC for solar projects that commence construction by December 31, 2019; 26% ITC for solar projects that commence construction in 2020; 22% ITC for solar projects that commence construction in 2021; and a permanent 10% ITC for solar projects that commence construction on or after January 1, 2022. In addition, the PATH Act allows for 100% PTC for wind projects that commenced construction in 2016; 80% PTC for wind projects that commenced construction in 2017; 60% PTC for wind projects that commenced construction in 2018 and 40% PTC for wind projects that commence construction in 2019. Wind projects commencing construction after 2019 will not be entitled to any PTCs. Southern Company has received ITCs and PTCs in connection with investments in solar, wind, and biomass facilities primarily at Southern Power and Georgia Power. See Note 1 to the financial statements under "Income Taxes" and Note 10 to the financial statements under "Current and Deferred Income TaxesTax Credit Carryforwards" for additional information regarding the utilization and amortization of credits and the tax benefit related to basis differences.
Other Matters
Southern Company and its subsidiaries are involved in various other matters being litigated and regulatory matters that could affect future earnings. In addition, Southern Company and its subsidiaries are subject to certain claims and legal actions arising in the ordinary course of business. The business activities of Southern Company's subsidiaries are subject to extensive governmental regulation related to public health and the environment, such as laws and regulations governing air, water, land, and protection of other natural resources. Litigation over environmental issues and claims of various types, including property damage, personal injury, common law nuisance, and citizen enforcement of environmental laws and regulations, has occurred throughout the U.S. This litigation has included claims for damages alleged to have been caused by CO2 and other emissions, CCR, and alleged exposure to hazardous materials, and/or requests for injunctive relief in connection with such matters.
The ultimate outcome of such pending or potential litigation or regulatory matters cannot be predicted at this time; however, for current proceedings not specifically reported herein or in Notes 2 and 3 to the financial statements, management does not anticipate that the ultimate liabilities, if any, arising from such current proceedings would have a material effect on Southern Company's financial statements. See Notes 2 and 3 to the financial statements for a discussion of various other contingencies, regulatory matters, and other matters being litigated which may affect future earnings potential.
Litigation
In January 2017, a putative securities class action complaint was filed against Southern Company, certain of its officers, and certain former Mississippi Power officers in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Georgia, Atlanta Division, by Monroe County Employees' Retirement System on behalf of all persons who purchased shares of Southern Company's common stock between April 25, 2012 and October 29, 2013. The complaint alleges that Southern Company, certain of its officers, and certain former Mississippi Power officers made materially false and misleading statements regarding the Kemper County energy facility in violation of certain provisions under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. The complaint seeks, among other things, compensatory damages and litigation costs and attorneys' fees. In June 2017, the plaintiffs filed an amended complaint that provided additional detail about their claims, increased the purported class period by one day, and added certain other former Mississippi Power officers as defendants. In July 2017, the defendants filed a motion to dismiss the plaintiffs' amended complaint with prejudice, to which the plaintiffs filed an opposition in September 2017. On March 29, 2018, the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Georgia, Atlanta Division, issued an order granting, in part, the defendants' motion to dismiss. The court dismissed certain claims against certain officers of Southern Company and Mississippi Power and dismissed the allegations related to a number of the statements that plaintiffs challenged as being false or misleading. On April 26, 2018, the

MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS (continued)
Southern Company and Subsidiary Companies 2018 Annual Report


defendants filed a motion for reconsideration of the court's order, seeking dismissal of the remaining claims in the lawsuit. On August 10, 2018, the court denied the motion for reconsideration and denied a motion to certify the issue for interlocutory appeal.
In February 2017, Jean Vineyard filed a shareholder derivative lawsuit and, in May 2017, Judy Mesirov filed a shareholder derivative lawsuit, each in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Georgia. Each of these lawsuits names as defendants Southern Company, certain of its directors, certain of its officers, and certain former Mississippi Power officers. In August 2017, these two shareholder derivative lawsuits were consolidated in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Georgia. The complaints allege that the defendants caused Southern Company to make false or misleading statements regarding the Kemper County energy facility cost and schedule. Further, the complaints allege that the defendants were unjustly enriched and caused the waste of corporate assets and also allege that the individual defendants violated their fiduciary duties. Each plaintiff seeks to recover, on behalf of Southern Company, unspecified actual damages and, on each plaintiff's own behalf, attorneys' fees and costs in bringing the lawsuit. Each plaintiff also seeks certain changes to Southern Company's corporate governance and internal processes. On April 25, 2018, the court entered an order staying this lawsuit until 30 days after the resolution of any dispositive motions or any settlement, whichever is earlier, in the putative securities class action.
In May 2017, Helen E. Piper Survivor's Trust filed a shareholder derivative lawsuit in the Superior Court of Gwinnett County, State of Georgia that names as defendants Southern Company, certain of its directors, certain of its officers, and certain former Mississippi Power officers. The complaint alleges that the individual defendants, among other things, breached their fiduciary duties in connection with schedule delays and cost overruns associated with the construction of the Kemper County energy facility. The complaint further alleges that the individual defendants authorized or failed to correct false and misleading statements regarding the Kemper County energy facility schedule and cost and failed to implement necessary internal controls to prevent harm to Southern Company. The plaintiff seeks to recover, on behalf of Southern Company, unspecified actual damages and disgorgement of profits and, on its behalf, attorneys' fees and costs in bringing the lawsuit. The plaintiff also seeks certain unspecified changes to Southern Company's corporate governance and internal processes. On May 4, 2018, the court entered an order staying this lawsuit until 30 days after the resolution of any dispositive motions or any settlement, whichever is earlier, in the putative securities class action.
On May 18, 2018, Southern Company and Mississippi Power received a notice of dispute and arbitration demand filed by Martin Product Sales, LLC (Martin) based on two agreements, both related to Kemper IGCC byproducts for which Mississippi Power provided termination notices in September 2017. Martin alleges breach of contract, breach of good faith and fair dealing, fraud and misrepresentation, and civil conspiracy and makes a claim for damages in the amount of approximately $143 million, as well as additional unspecified damages, attorney's fees, costs, and interest. In the first quarter 2019, Mississippi Power and Southern Company filed motions to dismiss.
Southern Company believes these legal challenges have no merit; however, an adverse outcome in any of these proceedings could have an impact on Southern Company's results of operations, financial condition, and liquidity. Southern Company will vigorously defend itself in these matters, the ultimate outcome of which cannot be determined at this time.
Investments in Leveraged Leases
A subsidiary of Southern Holdings has several leveraged lease agreements, with original terms ranging up to 45 years, which relate to international and domestic energy generation, distribution, and transportation assets. Southern Company receives federal income tax deductions for depreciation and amortization, as well as interest on long-term debt related to these investments. Southern Company reviews all important lease assumptions at least annually, or more frequently if events or changes in circumstances indicate that a change in assumptions has occurred or may occur. These assumptions include the effective tax rate, the residual value, the credit quality of the lessees, and the timing of expected tax cash flows. See Note 1 to the financial statements under "Leveraged Leases" for additional information.
The ability of the lessees to make required payments to the Southern Holdings subsidiary is dependent on the operational performance of the assets. In 2017, the financial and operational performance of one of the lessees and the associated generation assets raised significant concerns about the short-term ability of the generation assets to produce cash flows sufficient to support ongoing operations and the lessee's contractual obligations and its ability to make the remaining semi-annual lease payments to the Southern Holdings subsidiary beginning in June 2018. As a result of operational improvements in 2018, the 2018 lease payments were paid in full. However, operational issues and the resulting cash liquidity challenges persist and significant concerns continue regarding the lessee's ability to make the remaining semi-annual lease payments. These operational challenges may also impact the expected residual value of the assets at the end of the lease term in 2047. If any future lease payment is not paid in full, the Southern Holdings subsidiary may be unable to make its corresponding payment to the holders of the underlying non-recourse debt related to the generation assets. Failure to make the required payment to the debtholders could represent an event of default that would give the debtholders the right to foreclose on, and take ownership of, the generation assets from the

MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS (continued)
Southern Company and Subsidiary Companies 2018 Annual Report


Southern Holdings subsidiary, in effect terminating the lease and resulting in the write-off of the related lease receivable, which would result in a reduction in net income of approximately $86 million after tax based on the lease receivable balance at December 31, 2018. Southern Company has evaluated the recoverability of the lease receivable and the expected residual value of the generation assets at the end of the lease under various scenarios and has concluded that its investment in the leveraged lease is not impaired at December 31, 2018. Southern Company will continue to monitor the operational performance of the underlying assets and evaluate the ability of the lessee to continue to make the required lease payments. The ultimate outcome of this matter cannot be determined at this time.
Mississippi Power
In conjunction with Southern Company's sale of Gulf Power, Mississippi Power and Gulf Power have committed to seek a restructuring of their 50% undivided ownership interests in Plant Daniel such that each of them would, after the restructuring, own 100% of a generating unit. On January 15, 2019, Gulf Power provided notice to Mississippi Power that Gulf Power will retire its share of the generating capacity of Plant Daniel on January 15, 2024. Mississippi Power has the option to purchase Gulf Power's ownership interest for $1 on January 15, 2024, provided that Mississippi Power exercises the option no later than 120 days prior to that date. Mississippi Power is assessing the potential operational and economic effects of Gulf Power's notice. The ultimate outcome of these matters remains subject to completion of Mississippi Power's evaluations and applicable regulatory approvals, including the FERC and the Mississippi PSC, and cannot now be determined. See Note 15 to the financial statements under "Southern Company's Sale of Gulf Power" for information regarding the sale of Gulf Power.
Southern Power
On January 29, 2019, Pacific Gas & Electric Company (PG&E) filed petitions to reorganize under Chapter 11 of the U.S. Bankruptcy Code. Southern Power, together with its noncontrolling partners, owns four solar facilities where PG&E is the energy off-taker for approximately 207 MWs of capacity under long-term PPAs. PG&E is also the transmission provider for these facilities and two of Southern Power's other solar facilities. Southern Power has evaluated the recoverability of its investments in these solar facilities under various scenarios, including selling the related energy into the competitive markets, and has concluded they are not impaired. At December 31, 2018, Southern Power had outstanding accounts receivables due from PG&E of $1 million related to the PPAs and $36 million related to the transmission interconnections. Southern Company does not expect a material impact to its financial statements if, as a result of the bankruptcy proceedings, PG&E does not perform in accordance with the PPAs or the terms of the PPAs are renegotiated; however, the ultimate outcome of this matter cannot be determined at this time.
Southern Company Gas
A wholly-owned subsidiary of Southern Company Gas owns and operates a natural gas storage facility consisting of two salt dome caverns in Louisiana. Periodic integrity tests are required in accordance with rules of the Louisiana Department of Natural Resources (DNR). In August 2017, in connection with an ongoing integrity project, updated seismic mapping indicated the proximity of one of the caverns to the edge of the salt dome may be less than the required minimum and could result in Southern Company Gas retiring the cavern early. At December 31, 2018, the facility's property, plant, and equipment had a net book value of $109 million, of which the cavern itself represents approximately 20%. A potential early retirement of this cavern is dependent upon several factors including compliance with an order from the Louisiana DNR detailing the requirements to place the cavern back in service, which includes, among other things, obtaining core samples to determine the composition of the sheath surrounding the edge of the salt dome.
The cavern continues to maintain its pressures and overall structural integrity. Southern Company Gas intends to monitor the cavern and comply with the Louisiana DNR order through 2020 and place the cavern back in service in 2021. These events were considered in connection with Southern Company Gas' annual long-lived asset impairment analysis, which determined there was no impairment as of December 31, 2018. Any changes in results of monitoring activities, rates at which expiring capacity contracts are re-contracted, timing of placing the cavern back in service, or Louisiana DNR requirements could trigger impairment. Further, early retirement of the cavern could trigger impairment of other long-lived assets associated with the natural gas storage facility. The ultimate outcome of this matter cannot be determined at this time, but could have a significant impact on Southern Company's financial statements.
ACCOUNTING POLICIES
Application of Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates
Southern Company prepares its consolidated financial statements in accordance with GAAP. Significant accounting policies are described in Notes 1, 5, and 6 to the financial statements. In the application of these policies, certain estimates are made that may

MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS (continued)
Southern Company and Subsidiary Companies 2018 Annual Report


have a material impact on Southern Company's results of operations and related disclosures. Different assumptions and measurements could produce estimates that are significantly different from those recorded in the financial statements. Senior management has reviewed and discussed the following critical accounting policies and estimates with the Audit Committee of Southern Company's Board of Directors.
Utility Regulation
Southern Company's traditional electric operating companies and natural gas distribution utilities, which collectively comprised approximately 85% of Southern Company's total operating revenues for 2018, are subject to retail regulation by their respective state PSCs or other applicable state regulatory agencies and wholesale regulation by the FERC. These regulatory agencies set the rates the traditional electric operating companies and the natural gas distribution utilities are permitted to charge customers based on allowable costs, including a reasonable ROE. As a result, the traditional electric operating companies and the natural gas distribution utilities apply accounting standards which require the financial statements to reflect the effects of rate regulation. Through the ratemaking process, the regulators may require the inclusion of costs or revenues in periods different than when they would be recognized by a non-regulated company. This treatment may result in the deferral of expenses and the recording of related regulatory assets based on anticipated future recovery through rates or the deferral of gains or creation of liabilities and the recording of related regulatory liabilities. The application of the accounting standards has a further effect on Southern Company's financial statements as a result of the estimates of allowable costs used in the ratemaking process. These estimates may differ from those actually incurred by the traditional electric operating companies and the natural gas distribution utilities; therefore, the accounting estimates inherent in specific costs such as depreciation, AROs, and pension and other postretirement benefits have less of a direct impact on Southern Company's results of operations and financial condition than they would on a non-regulated company. See Note 15 to the financial statements for information regarding the sale of Gulf Power and three of Southern Company Gas' natural gas distribution utilities.
As reflected in Note 2 to the financial statements under "Southern CompanyRegulatory Assets and Liabilities," significant regulatory assets and liabilities have been recorded. Management reviews the ultimate recoverability of these regulatory assets and any requirement to refund these regulatory liabilities based on applicable regulatory guidelines and GAAP. However, adverse legislative, judicial, or regulatory actions could materially impact the amounts of such regulatory assets and liabilities and could adversely impact Southern Company's financial statements.
Estimated Cost, Schedule, and Rate Recovery for the Construction of Plant Vogtle Units 3 and 4
In 2016, the Georgia PSC approved the Vogtle Cost Settlement Agreement, which resolved certain prudency matters in connection with Georgia Power's fifteenth VCM report. In December 2017, the Georgia PSC approved Georgia Power's seventeenth VCM report, which included a recommendation to continue construction of Plant Vogtle Units 3 and 4, with Southern Nuclear serving as project manager and Bechtel serving as the primary construction contractor, as well as a modification of the Vogtle Cost Settlement Agreement. The Georgia PSC's related order stated that under the modified Vogtle Cost Settlement Agreement, (i) none of the $3.3 billion of costs incurred through December 31, 2015 should be disallowed as imprudent; (ii) capital costs incurred up to $5.68 billion would be presumed to be reasonable and prudent with the burden of proof on any party challenging such costs; (iii) Georgia Power would have the burden of proof to show that any capital costs above $5.68 billion were prudent; (iv) Georgia Power's total project capital cost forecast of $7.3 billion (net of $1.7 billion received under the Guarantee Settlement Agreement and approximately $188 million in related Customer Refunds) was found reasonable and did not represent a cost cap; and (v) prudence decisions would be made subsequent to achieving fuel load for Unit 4.
In its order, the Georgia PSC also stated if other conditions change and assumptions upon which Georgia Power's seventeenth VCM report are based do not materialize, the Georgia PSC reserved the right to reconsider the decision to continue construction.
In the second quarter 2018, Georgia Power revised its base cost forecast and estimated contingency to complete construction and start-up of Plant Vogtle Units 3 and 4 to $8.0 billion and $0.4 billion, respectively, for a total project capital cost forecast of $8.4 billion (net of $1.7 billion received under the Guarantee Settlement Agreement and approximately $188 million in related Customer Refunds). Although Georgia Power believes these incremental costs are reasonable and necessary to complete the project and the Georgia PSC's order in the seventeenth VCM proceeding specifically states that the construction of Plant Vogtle Units 3 and 4 is not subject to a cost cap, Georgia Power did not seek rate recovery for the $0.7 billion increase in costs included in the current base capital cost forecast in the nineteenth VCM report. In connection with future VCM filings, Georgia Power may request the Georgia PSC to evaluate costs currently included in the construction contingency estimate for rate recovery as and when they are appropriately included in the base capital cost forecast. After considering the significant level of uncertainty that exists regarding the future recoverability of costs included in the construction contingency estimate since the ultimate outcome of these matters is subject to the outcome of future assessments by management, as well as Georgia PSC decisions in these future

MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS (continued)
Southern Company and Subsidiary Companies 2018 Annual Report


regulatory proceedings, Georgia Power recorded a total pre-tax charge to income of $1.1 billion ($0.8 billion after tax) in the second quarter 2018.
Georgia Power's revised cost estimate reflects an expected in-service date of November 2021 for Unit 3 and November 2022 for Unit 4.
As construction continues, challenges with management of contractors, subcontractors, and vendors; labor productivity, availability, and/or cost escalation; procurement, fabrication, delivery, assembly, and/or installation and testing, including any required engineering changes, of plant systems, structures, and components (some of which are based on new technology that only recently began initial operation in the global nuclear industry at this scale); or other issues could arise and change the projected schedule and estimated cost. Monthly construction production targets required to maintain the current project schedule will continue to increase significantly throughout 2019. To meet these increasing monthly targets, existing craft construction productivity must improve and additional craft laborers must be retained and deployed.
Georgia Power and Southern Nuclear believe it is a leading practice in connection with a construction project of this size and complexity to periodically validate recent construction progress in comparison to the projected schedule and to verify and update quantities of commodities remaining to install, labor productivity, and forecasted staffing needs. This verification process, led by Southern Nuclear, was underway as of December 31, 2018 and is expected to be completed during the second quarter 2019. Georgia Power currently does not anticipate any material changes to the total estimated project capital cost forecast for Plant Vogtle Units 3 and 4 or the expected in-service dates of November 2021 and November 2022, respectively, resulting from this verification process. However, the ultimate impact on cost and schedule, if any, will not be known until the verification process is completed. Georgia Power is required to report the results and any project impacts to the Georgia PSC by May 15, 2019.
There have been technical and procedural challenges to the construction and licensing of Plant Vogtle Units 3 and 4 at the federal and state level and additional challenges may arise. Processes are in place that are designed to assure compliance with the requirements specified in the Westinghouse Design Control Document and the combined construction and operating licenses, including inspections by Southern Nuclear and the NRC that occur throughout construction. As a result of such compliance processes, certain license amendment requests have been filed and approved or are pending before the NRC. Various design and other licensing-based compliance matters, including the timely resolution of ITAAC and the related approvals by the NRC, may arise, which may result in additional license amendments or require other resolution. If any license amendment requests or other licensing-based compliance issues are not resolved in a timely manner, there may be delays in the project schedule that could result in increased costs.
The ultimate outcome of these matters cannot be determined at this time. Any extension of the in-service dates of November 2021 for Unit 3 and November 2022 for Unit 4 is currently estimated to result in additional base capital costs of approximately $50 million per month, based on Georgia Power's ownership interests, and AFUDC of approximately $12 million per month. While Georgia Power is not precluded from seeking recovery of any future capital cost forecast increase, management will ultimately determine whether or not to seek recovery. Any further changes to the capital cost forecast that are not expected to be recoverable through regulated rates will be required to be charged to income and such charges could be material.
Given the significant complexity involved in estimating the future costs to complete construction and start-up of Plant Vogtle Units 3 and 4 and the significant management judgment necessary to assess the related uncertainties surrounding future rate recovery of any projected cost increases, as well as the potential impact on Southern Company's results of operations and cash flows, Southern Company considers these items to be critical accounting estimates. See Note 2 to the financial statements under "Georgia PowerNuclear Construction" for additional information.
Accounting for Income Taxes
The consolidated income tax provision and deferred income tax assets and liabilities, as well as any unrecognized tax benefits and valuation allowances, require significant judgment and estimates. These estimates are supported by historical tax return data, reasonable projections of taxable income, and interpretations of applicable tax laws and regulations across multiple taxing jurisdictions. The effective tax rate reflects the statutory tax rates and calculated apportionments for the various states in which the Southern Company system operates.
Southern Company files a consolidated federal income tax return and various state income tax returns, some of which are combined or unitary. Under a joint consolidated income tax allocation agreement, each Southern Company subsidiary's current and deferred tax expense is computed on a stand-alone basis and no subsidiary is allocated more current expense than would be paid if it filed a separate income tax return. Certain deductions and credits can be limited at the consolidated or combined level resulting in NOL and tax credit carryforwards that would not otherwise result on a stand-alone basis. Utilization of NOL and tax credit carryforwards and the assessment of valuation allowances are based on significant judgment and extensive analysis of

MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS (continued)
Southern Company and Subsidiary Companies 2018 Annual Report


Southern Company's current financial position and result of operations, including currently available information about future years, to estimate when future taxable income will be realized.
Current and deferred state income tax liabilities and assets are estimated based on laws of multiple states that determine the income to be apportioned to their jurisdictions. States utilize various formulas to calculate the apportionment of taxable income, primarily using sales, assets, or payroll within the jurisdiction compared to the consolidated totals. In addition, each state varies as to whether a stand-alone, combined, or unitary filing methodology is required. The calculation of deferred state taxes considers apportionment factors and filing methodologies that are expected to apply in future years. The apportionments and methodologies which are ultimately finalized in a manner inconsistent with expectations could have a material effect on Southern Company's financial statements.
Given the significant judgment involved in estimating NOL and tax credit carryforwards and multi-state apportionments for all subsidiaries, Southern Company considers federal and state deferred income tax liabilities and assets to be critical accounting estimates.
Asset Retirement Obligations
AROs are computed as the fair value of the estimated costs for an asset's future retirement and are recorded in the period in which the liability is incurred. The estimated costs are capitalized as part of the related long-lived asset and depreciated over the asset's useful life. In the absence of quoted market prices, AROs are estimated using present value techniques in which estimates of future cash outlays associated with the asset retirements are discounted using a credit-adjusted risk-free rate. Estimates of the timing and amounts of future cash outlays are based on projections of when and how the assets will be retired and the cost of future removal activities.
The liability for AROs primarily relates to facilities that are subject to the CCR Rule and the related state rules, principally ash ponds, and the decommissioning of the Southern Company system's nuclear facilities – Alabama Power's Plant Farley and Georgia Power's ownership interests in Plant Hatch and Plant Vogtle Units 1 and 2. In addition, the Southern Company system has AROs related to various landfill sites, asbestos removal, mine reclamation, land restoration related to solar and wind facilities, and disposal of polychlorinated biphenyls in certain transformers.
The traditional electric operating companies and Southern Company Gas also have identified retirement obligations, such as obligations related to certain electric transmission and distribution facilities, certain asbestos containing material within long-term assets not subject to ongoing repair and maintenance activities, certain wireless communication towers, the disposal of polychlorinated biphenyls in certain transformers, leasehold improvements, equipment on customer property, and property associated with the Southern Company system's rail lines and natural gas pipelines. However, liabilities for the removal of these assets have not been recorded as the fair value of the retirement obligations cannot be reasonably estimated. A liability for these retirement obligations will be recognized when sufficient information becomes available to support a reasonable estimation of the retirement obligation.
The cost estimates for AROs related to the disposal of CCR are based on information using various assumptions related to closure and post-closure costs, timing of future cash outlays, inflation and discount rates, and the potential methods for complying with the CCR Rule. During 2018, Alabama Power and Georgia Power recorded increases of approximately $1.2 billion and $3.1 billion, respectively, to their AROs related to the disposal of CCR and increases of approximately $300 million and $130 million, respectively, to their AROs related to updated nuclear decommissioning cost site studies. Alabama Power's CCR-related update resulted from feasibility studies performed on ash ponds in use at the plants it operates, which indicated that additional closure costs, primarily related to increases in estimated ash volume, water management requirements, and design revisions, will be required to close these ash ponds under the planned closure-in-place methodology. Georgia Power's CCR-related update resulted from a strategic assessment which indicated additional closure costs will be required to close its ash ponds, primarily due to changes in closure strategies, the estimated amount of ash to be excavated, and additional water management requirements necessary to support closure strategies. The traditional electric operating companies expect to periodically update their ARO cost estimates. See FUTURE EARNINGS POTENTIAL – "Environmental MattersEnvironmental Laws and RegulationsCoal Combustion Residuals" herein and Note 6 to the financial statements for additional information.
Given the significant judgment involved in estimating AROs, Southern Company considers the liabilities for AROs to be critical accounting estimates.
Pension and Other Postretirement Benefits
Southern Company's calculation of pension and other postretirement benefits expense is dependent on a number of assumptions. These assumptions include discount rates, healthcare cost trend rates, expected long-term return on plan assets, mortality rates, expected salary and wage increases, and other factors. Components of pension and other postretirement benefits expense include

MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS (continued)
Southern Company and Subsidiary Companies 2018 Annual Report


interest and service cost on the pension and other postretirement benefit plans, expected return on plan assets, and amortization of certain unrecognized costs and obligations. Actual results that differ from the assumptions utilized are accumulated and amortized over future periods and, therefore, generally affect recognized expense and the recorded obligation in future periods. While Southern Company believes that the assumptions used are appropriate, differences in actual experience or significant changes in assumptions would affect its pension and other postretirement benefit costs and obligations.
Key elements in determining Southern Company's pension and other postretirement benefit expense are the expected long-term return on plan assets and the discount rate used to measure the benefit plan obligations and the periodic benefit plan expense for future periods. The expected long-term return on pension and other postretirement benefit plan assets is based on Southern Company's investment strategy, historical experience, and expectations for long-term rates of return that consider external actuarial advice. Southern Company determines the long-term return on plan assets by applying the long-term rate of expected returns on various asset classes to Southern Company's target asset allocation. For purposes of determining its liability related to the pension and other postretirement benefit plans, Southern Company discounts the future related cash flows using a single-point discount rate for each plan developed from the weighted average of market-observed yields for high quality fixed income securities with maturities that correspond to expected benefit payments.
The following table illustrates the sensitivity to changes in Southern Company's long-term assumptions with respect to the discount rate, salary increases, and the long-term rate of return on plan assets:
Change in AssumptionIncrease/(Decrease) in Total Benefit Expense for 2019Increase/(Decrease) in Projected Obligation for Pension Plan at December 31, 2018Increase/(Decrease) in Projected Obligation for Other Postretirement Benefit Plans at December 31, 2018
(in millions)
25 basis point change in discount rate$37/$(36)$434/$(411)$50/$(48)
25 basis point change in salaries$11/$(11)$105/$(101)$–/$–
25 basis point change in long-term return on plan assets$33/$(33)N/AN/A
N/A – Not applicable
See Note 11 to the financial statements for additional information regarding pension and other postretirement benefits.
Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets
The acquisition method of accounting requires the assets acquired and liabilities assumed to be recorded at the date of acquisition at their respective estimated fair values. Southern Company recognizes goodwill as of the acquisition date, as a residual over the fair values of the identifiable net assets acquired. Goodwill is tested for impairment on an annual basis in the fourth quarter of the year as well as on an interim basis as events and changes in circumstances occur. Primarily as a result of the acquisitions of Southern Company Gas and PowerSecure in 2016, goodwill totaled approximately $5.3 billion at December 31, 2018. As a result of the Southern Company Gas Dispositions, goodwill was reduced by $910 million during 2018. In addition, Southern Company Gas recorded a $42 million goodwill impairment charge in 2018 in contemplation of the sale of Pivotal Home Solutions.
Definite-lived intangible assets acquired are amortized over the estimated useful lives of the respective assets to reflect the pattern in which the economic benefits of the intangible assets are consumed. Whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of the intangible assets may not be recoverable, the intangible assets will be reviewed for impairment. Primarily as a result of the acquisitions of Southern Company Gas and PowerSecure and PPA fair value adjustments resulting from Southern Power's acquisitions, other intangible assets, net of amortization totaled approximately $613 million at December 31, 2018.
The judgments made in determining the estimated fair value assigned to each class of assets acquired and liabilities assumed, as well as asset lives, can significantly impact Southern Company's results of operations. Fair values and useful lives are determined based on, among other factors, the expected future period of benefit of the asset, the various characteristics of the asset, and projected cash flows. As the determination of an asset's fair value and useful life involves management making certain estimates and because these estimates form the basis for the determination of whether or not an impairment charge should be recorded, Southern Company considers these estimates to be critical accounting estimates.
See Note 1 to the financial statements under "Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets and Liabilities" for additional information regarding Southern Company's goodwill and other intangible assets and Note 15 to the financial statements for additional

MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS (continued)
Southern Company and Subsidiary Companies 2018 Annual Report


information related to Southern Company's 2016 acquisitions of Southern Company Gas and PowerSecure, as well as the Southern Company Gas Dispositions.
Derivatives and Hedging Activities
Derivative instruments are recorded on the balance sheets as either assets or liabilities measured at their fair value, unless the transactions qualify for the normal purchases or normal sales scope exception and are instead subject to traditional accrual accounting. For those transactions that do not qualify as a normal purchase or normal sale, changes in the derivatives' fair values are recognized concurrently in earnings unless specific hedge accounting criteria are met. If the derivatives meet those criteria, derivative gains and losses offset related results of the hedged item in the income statement in the case of a fair value hedge, or gains and losses are deferred in OCI until the hedged transaction affects earnings in the case of a cash flow hedge. Certain subsidiaries of Southern Company enter into energy-related derivatives that are designated as regulatory hedges where gains and losses are initially recorded as regulatory liabilities and assets and then are included in fuel expense as the underlying fuel is used in operations and ultimately recovered through billings to customers.
Southern Company uses derivative instruments to reduce the impact to the results of operations due to the risk of changes in the price of natural gas, to manage fuel hedging programs per guidelines of state regulatory agencies, and to mitigate residual changes in the price of electricity, weather, interest rates, and foreign currency exchange rates. The fair value of commodity derivative instruments used to manage exposure to changing prices reflects the estimated amounts that Southern Company would receive or pay to terminate or close the contracts at the reporting date. To determine the fair value of the derivative instruments, Southern Company utilizes market data or assumptions that market participants would use in pricing the derivative asset or liability, including assumptions about risk and the risks inherent in the inputs of the valuation technique.
Southern Company classifies derivative assets and liabilities based on the lowest level of input that is significant to the fair value measurement. The assessment of the significance of a particular input to the fair value measurement requires judgment and may affect the valuation of fair value assets and liabilities and their placement within the fair value hierarchy. The determination of the fair value of the derivative instruments incorporates various required factors. These factors include:
the creditworthiness of the counterparties involved and the impact of credit enhancements (such as cash deposits and letters of credit);
events specific to a given counterparty; and
the impact of Southern Company's nonperformance risk on its liabilities.
Given the assumptions used in pricing the derivative asset or liability, Southern Company considers the valuation of derivative assets and liabilities a critical accounting estimate. See FINANCIAL CONDITION AND LIQUIDITY – "Market Price Risk" herein and Note 14 to the financial statements for more information.
Contingent Obligations
Southern Company is subject to a number of federal and state laws and regulations as well as other factors and conditions that subject it to environmental, litigation, and other risks. See FUTURE EARNINGS POTENTIAL herein and Notes 2 and 3 to the financial statements for more information regarding certain of these contingencies. Southern Company periodically evaluates its exposure to such risks and records reserves for those matters where a non-tax-related loss is considered probable and reasonably estimable. The adequacy of reserves can be significantly affected by external events or conditions that can be unpredictable; thus, the ultimate outcome of such matters could materially affect Southern Company's results of operations, cash flows, or financial condition.
Recently Issued Accounting Standards
See Note 1 to the financial statements under "Recently Adopted Accounting Standards" for additional information.
In 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-02, Leases (Topic 842) (ASU 2016-02). ASU 2016-02 requires lessees to recognize on the balance sheet a lease liability and a right-of-use asset for all leases. ASU 2016-02 also changes the recognition, measurement, and presentation of expense associated with leases and provides clarification regarding the identification of certain components of contracts that would represent a lease. The accounting required by lessors is relatively unchanged and there is no change to the accounting for existing leveraged leases. ASU 2016-02 is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2018 and Southern Company adopted the new standard effective January 1, 2019.
Southern Company elected the transition methodology provided by ASU No. 2018-11, Leases (Topic 842): Targeted Improvements, whereby the requirements of ASU 2016-02 are applied on a prospective basis as of the adoption date of January 1, 2019, without restating prior periods. Southern Company elected the package of practical expedients provided by ASU 2016-02

MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS (continued)
Southern Company and Subsidiary Companies 2018 Annual Report


that allows prior determinations of whether existing contracts are, or contain, leases and the classification of existing leases to continue without reassessment. Additionally, Southern Company applied the use-of-hindsight practical expedient in determining lease terms as of the date of adoption and elected the practical expedient that allows existing land easements not previously accounted for as leases not to be reassessed. Southern Company also made accounting policy elections to account for short-term leases in all asset classes as off-balance sheet leases and combined lease and non-lease components in the computations of lease obligations and right-of-use assets for most asset classes.
The Southern Company system completed the implementation of a new application to track and account for its leases and updated its internal controls and accounting policies to support the accounting for leases under ASU 2016-02. The Southern Company system completed its lease inventory and determined its most significant leases involve PPAs, real estate, and communication towers where certain of Southern Company's subsidiaries are the lessee and PPAs where certain of Southern Company's subsidiaries are the lessor. In the first quarter 2019, the adoption of ASU 2016-02 resulted in recording lease liabilities and right-of-use assets on Southern Company's balance sheet each totaling approximately $2.0 billion, with no impact on Southern Company's statement of income.
FINANCIAL CONDITION AND LIQUIDITY
Overview
Earnings in all periods presented were negatively affected by charges associated with plants under construction; however, Southern Company's financial condition remained stable at December 31, 2018.
The Southern Company system's cash requirements primarily consist of funding ongoing operations, common stock dividends, capital expenditures, and debt maturities. The Southern Company system's capital expenditures and other investing activities include investments to meet projected long-term demand requirements, including to build new electric generation facilities, to maintain existing electric generation facilities, to comply with environmental regulations including adding environmental modifications to certain existing electric generating units and closures of ash ponds, to expand and improve electric transmission and distribution facilities, to update and expand natural gas distribution systems, and for restoration following major storms. Operating cash flows provide a substantial portion of the Southern Company system's cash needs. For the three-year period from 2019 through 2021, Southern Company's projected common stock dividends, capital expenditures, and debt maturities are expected to exceed operating cash flows. Southern Company plans to finance future cash needs in excess of its operating cash flows primarily by accessing borrowings from financial institutions and through debt and equity issuances in the capital markets. Southern Company intends to continue to monitor its access to short-term and long-term capital markets as well as bank credit arrangements to meet future capital and liquidity needs. See "Sources of Capital," "Financing Activities," and "Capital Requirements and Contractual Obligations" herein for additional information.
Southern Company's investments in the qualified pension plans and the nuclear decommissioning trust funds decreased in value at December 31, 2018 as compared to December 31, 2017. No contributions to the qualified pension plan were made for the year ended December 31, 2018 and no mandatory contributions to the qualified pension plans are anticipated during 2019. See "Contractual Obligations" herein and Notes 6 and 11 to the financial statements under "Nuclear Decommissioning" and "Pension Plans," respectively, for additional information.
Net cash provided from operating activities in 2018 totaled $6.9 billion, an increase of $0.6 billion from 2017. The increase in net cash provided from operating activities was primarily due to the timing of vendor payments and increased fuel cost recovery. Net cash provided from operating activities in 2017 totaled $6.4 billion, an increase of $1.5 billion from 2016. Significant changes in operating cash flow for 2017 as compared to 2016 included increases of $1.2 billion related to operating activities of Southern Company Gas, which was acquired on July 1, 2016, and $1.0 billion related to voluntary contributions to the qualified pension plan in 2016, partially offset by the timing of vendor payments.
Net cash used for investing activities in 2018, 2017, and 2016 totaled $5.8 billion, $7.2 billion, and $20.0 billion, respectively. The cash used for investing activities in 2018 was primarily due to the traditional electric operating companies' installation of equipment to comply with environmental standards and construction of electric generation, transmission, and distribution facilities and capital expenditures for Southern Company Gas' infrastructure replacement programs, partially offset by proceeds from the sale transactions described in Note 15 to the financial statements. The cash used for investing activities in 2017 was primarily due to the traditional electric operating companies' installation of equipment to comply with environmental standards and construction of electric generation, transmission, and distribution facilities, capital expenditures for Southern Company Gas' infrastructure replacement programs, and Southern Power's renewable acquisitions. The cash used for investing activities in 2016 was primarily due to the closing of the Merger, the acquisition of PowerSecure, Southern Company Gas' investment in SNG, the traditional electric operating companies' construction of electric generation, transmission, and distribution facilities and

MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS (continued)
Southern Company and Subsidiary Companies 2018 Annual Report


installation of equipment at electric generating facilities to comply with environmental standards, and Southern Power's acquisitions and construction of renewable facilities and a natural gas facility.
Net cash used for financing activities totaled $1.8 billion in 2018 primarily due to net redemptions and repurchases of long-term debt, common stock dividend payments, and a decrease in commercial paper borrowings, partially offset by net issuances of short-term bank debt, proceeds from Southern Power's sales of non-controlling equity interests in entities indirectly owning substantially all of its solar facilities and eight of its wind facilities, and the issuance of common stock. Net cash provided from financing activities totaled $1.0 billion in 2017 primarily due to net issuances of long-term and short-term debt, partially offset by common stock dividend payments. Net cash provided from financing activities totaled $15.7 billion in 2016 primarily due to issuances of long-term debt and common stock associated with completing the Merger and funding the subsidiaries' continuous construction programs, Southern Power's acquisitions, and Southern Company Gas' investment in SNG, partially offset by redemptions of long-term debt and common stock dividend payments. Fluctuations in cash flow from financing activities vary from year to year based on capital needs and the maturity or redemption of securities.
Significant balance sheet changes in 2018 included the reclassification of $5.7 billion and $3.3 billion in total assets and liabilities held for sale, respectively, primarily associated with Gulf Power, as well as decreases of $3.0 billion and $0.4 billion in total assets and liabilities, respectively, associated with the sales described in Note 15 to the financial statements under "Southern Power" and "Southern Company Gas." Also see Note 15 to the financial statements under "Southern Company's Sale of Gulf Power" and "Assets Held for Sale" for additional information. After adjusting for these changes, other significant balance sheet changes included an increase of $7.1 billion in total property, plant, and equipment primarily related to the $4.7 billion increase in AROs at Alabama Power and Georgia Power, as well as the traditional electric operating companies' installation of equipment to comply with environmental standards and construction of electric generation, transmission, and distribution facilities and Southern Company Gas' capital expenditures for infrastructure replacement programs, partially offset by the second quarter 2018 charge related to the construction of Plant Vogtle Units 3 and 4; a decrease of $3.1 billion in long-term debt (including amounts due within one year) resulting from the repayment of long-term debt; an increase of $3.0 billion in noncontrolling interests at Southern Power as a result of sales of interests in entities indirectly owning substantially all of its solar facilities and eight of its wind facilities; and an increase of $1.9 billion in other regulatory assets, deferred primarily related to AROs at Georgia Power. See Notes 2 and 15 to the financial statements under "Georgia PowerNuclear Construction" and "Southern PowerSales of Renewable Facility Interests," respectively, as well as Notes 6 and 8 to the financial statements and "Financing Activities" herein for additional information.
At the end of 2018, the market price of Southern Company's common stock was $43.92 per share (based on the closing price as reported on the NYSE) and the book value was $23.91 per share, representing a market-to-book value ratio of 184%, compared to $48.09, $23.99, and 201%, respectively, at the end of 2017.
Southern Company's consolidated ratio of common equity to total capitalization plus short-term debt was 32.5% and 31.5% at December 31, 2018 and 2017, respectively. See Note 8 to the financial statements for additional information.
Sources of Capital
Southern Company intends to meet its future capital needs through operating cash flows, borrowings from financial institutions, and debt and equity issuances in the capital markets. Equity capital can be provided from any combination of Southern Company's stock plans, private placements, or public offerings. The amount and timing of additional equity and debt issuances in 2019, as well as in subsequent years, will be contingent on Southern Company's investment opportunities and the Southern Company system's capital requirements and will depend upon prevailing market conditions and other factors. See "Capital Requirements and Contractual Obligations" herein for additional information.
Except as described herein, the traditional electric operating companies, Southern Power, and Southern Company Gas plan to obtain the funds required for construction and other purposes from operating cash flows, external security issuances, borrowings from financial institutions, and equity contributions or loans from Southern Company. Southern Power also plans to utilize tax equity partnership contributions, as well as funds resulting from its pending sale of Plant Mankato. However, the amount, type, and timing of any future financings, if needed, will depend upon prevailing market conditions, regulatory approval, and other factors. See Note 15 to the financial statements under "Southern PowerSales of Natural Gas Plants" herein for additional information.
In addition, in 2014, Georgia Power entered into the Loan Guarantee Agreement with the DOE, under which the proceeds of borrowings may be used to reimburse Georgia Power for Eligible Project Costs incurred in connection with its construction of Plant Vogtle Units 3 and 4. Under the Loan Guarantee Agreement, the DOE agreed to guarantee borrowings of up to $3.46 billion (not to exceed 70% of Eligible Project Costs) to be made by Georgia Power under a multi-advance credit facility (FFB Credit Facility) among Georgia Power, the DOE, and the FFB. At December 31, 2018, Georgia Power had borrowed $2.6 billion under

MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS (continued)
Southern Company and Subsidiary Companies 2018 Annual Report


the FFB Credit Facility. In July 2017, Georgia Power entered into an amendment to the Loan Guarantee Agreement, which provides that further advances are conditioned upon the DOE's approval of any agreements entered into in replacement of the Vogtle 3 and 4 Agreement and satisfaction of certain other conditions.
In September 2017, the DOE issued a conditional commitment to Georgia Power for up to approximately $1.67 billion of additional guaranteed loans under the Loan Guarantee Agreement. This conditional commitment expires on March 31, 2019, subject to any further extension approved by the DOE. Final approval and issuance of these additional loan guarantees by the DOE cannot be assured and are subject to the negotiation of definitive agreements, completion of due diligence by the DOE, receipt of any necessary regulatory approvals, and satisfaction of other conditions. See Note 8 to the financial statements under "Long-term DebtDOE Loan Guarantee Borrowings" for additional information regarding the Loan Guarantee Agreement, including applicable covenants, events of default, mandatory prepayment events (including any decision not to continue construction of Plant Vogtle Units 3 and 4), and additional conditions to borrowing. Also see Note 2 to the financial statements under "Georgia PowerNuclear Construction" for additional information regarding Plant Vogtle Units 3 and 4.
The issuance of securities by the traditional electric operating companies and Nicor Gas is generally subject to the approval of the applicable state PSC or other applicable state regulatory agency. The issuance of all securities by Mississippi Power and short-term securities by Georgia Power is generally subject to regulatory approval by the FERC. Additionally, with respect to the public offering of securities, Southern Company and certain of its subsidiaries file registration statements with the SEC under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (1933 Act). The amounts of securities authorized by the appropriate regulatory authorities, as well as the securities registered under the 1933 Act, are continuously monitored and appropriate filings are made to ensure flexibility in the capital markets.
Southern Company, each traditional electric operating company, and Southern Power generally obtain financing separately without credit support from any affiliate. The Southern Company system does not maintain a centralized cash or money pool. Therefore, funds of each company are not commingled with funds of any other company in the Southern Company system.
In addition, Southern Company Gas Capital obtains external financing for Southern Company Gas and its subsidiaries, other than Nicor Gas, which obtains financing separately without credit support from any affiliates. Nicor Gas' commercial paper program supports its working capital needs as Nicor Gas is not permitted to make money pool loans to affiliates. All of the other Southern Company Gas subsidiaries benefit from Southern Company Gas Capital's commercial paper program.
See Note 8 to the financial statements under "Bank Credit Arrangements" for additional information.
At December 31, 2018, Southern Company's current liabilities exceeded current assets by $4.7 billion, primarily due to $3.2 billion of long-term debt that is due within one year (including approximately $1.3 billion at the parent company, $0.2 billion at Alabama Power, $0.6 billion at Georgia Power, $0.6 billion at Southern Power, and $0.4 billion at Southern Company Gas) and $2.9 billion of notes payable (including approximately $1.8 billion at the parent company, $0.3 billion at Georgia Power, $0.1 billion at Southern Power, and $0.7 billion at Southern Company Gas). Subsequent to December 31, 2018, using proceeds from the sale of Gulf Power, the Southern Company parent entity repaid $0.7 billion of its long-term debt due within one year and all $1.8 billion of its notes payable at December 31, 2018. See "Financing Activities" herein for additional information. To meet short-term cash needs and contingencies, the Southern Company system has substantial cash flow from operating activities and access to capital markets and financial institutions. Southern Company, the traditional electric operating companies, Southern Power, and Southern Company Gas intend to utilize operating cash flows, as well as commercial paper, lines of credit, bank notes, and securities issuances, as market conditions permit, as well as, under certain circumstances for the traditional electric operating companies, Southern Power, and Southern Company Gas, equity contributions and/or loans from Southern Company to meet their short-term capital needs.

MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS (continued)
Southern Company and Subsidiary Companies 2018 Annual Report


At December 31, 2018, Southern Company and its subsidiaries had approximately $1.4 billion of cash and cash equivalents. Committed credit arrangements with banks at December 31, 2018 were as follows:
 Expires   Executable Term Loans Expires Within One Year
Company2019
2020
2022 Total 
Unused(d)
 
One
Year
 
Two
Years
 Term Out No Term Out
 (in millions)
Southern Company(a)
$
 $
 $2,000
 $2,000
 $1,999
 $
 $
 $
 $
Alabama Power33
 500
 800
 1,333
 1,333
 
 
 
 33
Georgia Power
 
 1,750
 1,750
 1,736
 
 
 
 
Mississippi Power100
 
 
 100
 100
 
 
 
 100
Southern Power(b)

 
 750
 750
 727
 
 
 
 
Southern Company Gas(c)

 
 1,900
 1,900
 1,895
 
 
 
 
Other30
 
 
 30
 30
 
 
 
 30
Southern Company Consolidated(e)
$163
 $500
 $7,200
 $7,863
 $7,820
 $
 $
 $
 $163
(a)Represents the Southern Company parent entity.
(b)Does not include Southern Power Company's $120 million continuing letter of credit facility for standby letters of credit expiring in 2021, of which $17 million was unused at December 31, 2018. Southern Power's subsidiaries are not parties to its bank credit arrangement.
(c)Southern Company Gas, as the parent entity, guarantees the obligations of Southern Company Gas Capital, which is the borrower of $1.4 billion of this arrangement. Southern Company Gas' committed credit arrangement also includes $500 million for which Nicor Gas is the borrower and which is restricted for working capital needs of Nicor Gas. Pursuant to this multi-year credit arrangement, the allocations between Southern Company Gas Capital and Nicor Gas may be adjusted.
(d)Amounts used are for letters of credit.
(e)
Excludes $280 million of committed credit arrangements of Gulf Power, which was sold on January 1, 2019. See Note 15 to the financial statements under "Southern Company's Sale of Gulf Power" for additional information.
See Note 8 to the financial statements under "Bank Credit Arrangements" for additional information.
Most of these bank credit arrangements, as well as the term loan arrangements of Alabama Power and Southern Power Company, contain covenants that limit debt levels and contain cross-acceleration or cross-default provisions to other indebtedness (including guarantee obligations) that are restricted only to the indebtedness of the individual company. Such cross-default provisions to other indebtedness would trigger an event of default if the applicable borrower defaulted on indebtedness or guarantee obligations over a specified threshold. Such cross-acceleration provisions to other indebtedness would trigger an event of default if the applicable borrower defaulted on indebtedness, the payment of which was then accelerated. At December 31, 2018, Southern Company, the traditional electric operating companies, Southern Power Company, Southern Company Gas, and Nicor Gas were in compliance with all such covenants. None of the bank credit arrangements contain material adverse change clauses at the time of borrowings.
Subject to applicable market conditions, Southern Company and its subsidiaries expect to renew or replace their bank credit arrangements as needed, prior to expiration. In connection therewith, Southern Company and its subsidiaries may extend the maturity dates and/or increase or decrease the lending commitments thereunder.
A portion of the unused credit with banks is allocated to provide liquidity support to the revenue bonds of the traditional electric operating companies and the commercial paper programs of Southern Company, the traditional electric operating companies, Southern Power Company, Southern Company Gas, and Nicor Gas. The amount of variable rate revenue bonds of the traditional electric operating companies outstanding requiring liquidity support at December 31, 2018 was approximately $1.6 billion, which included $82 million related to Gulf Power. In addition, at December 31, 2018, the traditional electric operating companies had approximately $403 million of revenue bonds outstanding that are required to be remarketed within the next 12 months, which included $58 million related to Gulf Power. See Note 15 to the financial statements under "Southern Company's Sale of Gulf Power" for information regarding the sale of Gulf Power on January 1, 2019. Subsequent to December 31, 2018, Georgia Power redeemed approximately $108 million of obligations related to outstanding variable rate pollution control revenue bonds.
Southern Company, Alabama Power, Georgia Power, Southern Power Company, Southern Company Gas, Nicor Gas, and SEGCO make short-term borrowings primarily through commercial paper programs that have the liquidity support of the committed bank credit arrangements described above. Short-term borrowings are included in notes payable in the balance sheets.

MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS (continued)
Southern Company and Subsidiary Companies 2018 Annual Report


Details of short-term borrowings were as follows:
 Short-term Debt at the End of the Period 
Short-term Debt During the Period (*)
 Amount Outstanding Weighted Average Interest Rate Average Amount Outstanding Weighted Average Interest Rate Maximum Amount Outstanding
 (in millions)   (in millions)   (in millions)
December 31, 2018:         
Commercial paper$1,064
 3.0% $1,655
 2.3% $3,042
Short-term bank debt1,851
 3.1% 1,722
 2.9% 2,504
Total$2,915
 3.1% $3,377
 2.6%  
December 31, 2017:         
Commercial paper$1,832
 1.8% $2,117
 1.3% $2,946
Short-term bank debt607
 2.3% 555
 2.1% 1,020
Total$2,439
 1.9% $2,672
 1.5%  
December 31, 2016:         
Commercial paper$1,909
 1.1% $976
 0.8% $1,970
Short-term bank debt123
 1.7% 176
 1.7% 500
Total$2,032
 1.1% $1,152
 1.1%  
(*)Average and maximum amounts are based upon daily balances during the 12-month periods ended December 31, 2018, 2017, and 2016.
In addition to the short-term borrowings of Southern Power Company included in the table above, at December 31, 2016, Southern Power Company subsidiaries assumed credit agreements (Project Credit Facilities) with the acquisition of certain solar facilities, which were non-recourse to Southern Power Company, the proceeds of which were used to finance project costs related to such solar facilities. The Project Credit Facilities were fully repaid in January 2017. For the year ended December 31, 2016, the Project Credit Facilities had a maximum amount outstanding of $828 million and an average amount outstanding of $566 million at a weighted average interest rate of 2.1% and had total amounts outstanding of $209 million at a weighted average interest rate of 2.1% at December 31, 2016.
Southern Company believes the need for working capital can be adequately met by utilizing commercial paper programs, lines of credit, bank term loans, and operating cash flows.
Financing Activities
During 2018, Southern Company issued approximately 11.6 million shares of common stock primarily through employee equity compensation plans and received proceeds of approximately $442 million.
In addition, during the third and fourth quarters 2018, Southern Company issued a total of approximately 12.1 million and 2.5 million shares, respectively, of common stock through at-the-market issuances pursuant to sales agency agreements related to Southern Company's continuous equity offering program and received cash proceeds of approximately $540 million and $108 million, respectively, net of $5 million and $1 million in commissions, respectively.

MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS (continued)
Southern Company and Subsidiary Companies 2018 Annual Report


The following table outlines the long-term debt financing activities for Southern Company and its subsidiaries for the year ended December 31, 2018:
Company
Senior
Note
Issuances
 
Senior Note
Maturities, Redemptions, and Repurchases
 
Revenue
Bond
Issuances and
Reofferings
of Purchased
Bonds
 
Revenue
Bond
Maturities, Redemptions,
 and Repurchases
 
Other
Long-Term
Debt
Issuances
 
Other
Long-Term
Debt
Redemptions
and
Maturities(a)
 (in millions)
Southern Company(b)
$750
 $1,000
 $
 $
 $
 $
Alabama Power500
 
 120
 120
 
 1
Georgia Power
 1,500
 108
 469
 
 111
Mississippi Power600
 155
 
 43
 
 900
Southern Power
 350
 
 
 
 420
Southern Company Gas
 155
 
 200
 300
 
Other(c)

 100
 
 
 100
 13
Elimination(d)

 
 
 
 
 (4)
Southern Company Consolidated$1,850
 $3,260
 $228
 $832
 $400
 $1,441
(a)Includes reductions in capital lease obligations resulting from cash payments under capital leases.
(b)Represents the Southern Company parent entity.
(c)
In November 2018, SEGCO, as borrower, and Alabama Power, as guarantor, entered into a $100 million long-term delayed draw floating rate bank term loan bearing interest based on three-month LIBOR, which SEGCO used to repay at maturity $100 million aggregate principal amount of Series 2013A Senior Notes due December 1, 2018. See Note 9 to the financial statements under "Guarantees" for additional information.
(d)Represents reductions in affiliate capital lease obligations at Georgia Power, which are eliminated in Southern Company's consolidated financial statements.
Except as otherwise described herein, Southern Company and its subsidiaries used the proceeds of debt issuances for their redemptions and maturities shown in the table above, to repay short-term indebtedness, and for general corporate purposes, including working capital. The subsidiaries also used the proceeds for their construction programs.
In March 2018, Southern Company entered into a $900 million short-term floating rate bank loan bearing interest based on one-month LIBOR, which was repaid in August 2018.
In April 2018, Southern Company borrowed $250 million pursuant to a short-term uncommitted bank credit arrangement, bearing interest at a rate agreed upon by Southern Company and the bank from time to time and payable on no less than 30 days' demand by the bank. Subsequent to December 31, 2018, Southern Company repaid this loan.
In June 2018, Southern Company repaid at maturity two $100 million short-term floating rate bank term loans.
In August 2018, Southern Company issued $750 million aggregate principal amount of Series 2018A Floating Rate Senior Notes due February 14, 2020 bearing interest based on three-month LIBOR, entered into a $1.5 billion short-term floating rate bank loan bearing interest based on one-month LIBOR, and repaid $250 million borrowed in August 2017 pursuant to a short-term uncommitted bank credit arrangement. Subsequent to December 31, 2018, Southern Company repaid the $1.5 billion short-term floating rate bank loan.
In the third quarter 2018, Southern Company repaid at maturity $500 million aggregate principal amount of 1.55% Senior Notes and $500 million aggregate principal amount of Series 2013A 2.45% Senior Notes.
Subsequent to December 31, 2018, through cash tender offers, Southern Company repurchased and retired approximately $522 million of the $1.0 billion aggregate principal amount outstanding of its 1.85% Senior Notes due July 1, 2019 (1.85% Notes), approximately $180 million of the $350 million aggregate principal amount outstanding of its Series 2014B 2.15% Senior Notes due September 1, 2019 (Series 2014B Notes), and approximately $504 million of the $750 million aggregate principal amount outstanding of its Series 2018A Floating Rate Notes due February 14, 2020 (Series 2018A Notes), for an aggregate purchase price, excluding accrued and unpaid interest, of approximately $1.2 billion. In addition, subsequent to December 31, 2018, and following the completion of the cash tender offers, Southern Company completed the redemption of all of the Series 2018A Notes remaining outstanding and called for redemption all of the 1.85% Notes and Series 2014B Notes remaining outstanding.

MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS (continued)
Southern Company and Subsidiary Companies 2018 Annual Report


Subsequent to December 31, 2018, Alabama Power repaid at maturity $200 million aggregate principal amount of Series Z 5.125% Senior Notes.
In January 2018, Georgia Power repaid its outstanding $150 million short-term floating rate bank loan due May 31, 2018.
In May 2018, through cash tender offers, Georgia Power repurchased and retired $89 million of the $250 million aggregate principal amount outstanding of its Series 2007A 5.65% Senior Notes due March 1, 2037, $326 million of the $500 million aggregate principal amount outstanding of its Series 2009A 5.95% Senior Notes due February 1, 2039, and $335 million of the $600 million aggregate principal amount outstanding of its Series 2010B 5.40% Senior Notes due June 1, 2040, for an aggregate purchase price, excluding accrued and unpaid interest, of $902 million.
Subsequent to December 31, 2018, Georgia Power redeemed approximately $13 million, $20 million, and $75 million aggregate principal amount of Development Authority of Burke County (Georgia) Pollution Control Revenue Bonds (Georgia Power Company Plant Vogtle Project), First Series 1992, Eighth Series 1994, and Second Series 1995, respectively.
In March 2018, Mississippi Power entered into a $300 million short-term floating rate bank loan bearing interest based on one-month LIBOR, of which $200 million was repaid in the second quarter 2018 and $100 million was repaid in the third quarter 2018. The proceeds of this loan, together with the proceeds of Mississippi Power's $600 million senior notes issuances, were used to repay Mississippi Power's $900 million unsecured floating rate term loan.
In October 2018, Mississippi Power completed the redemption of all 334,210 outstanding shares of its preferred stock (as well as related depositary shares), with an aggregate par value of approximately $33.4 million.
In May 2018, Southern Power entered into two short-term floating rate bank loans, each for an aggregate principal amount of $100 million, which bear interest based on one-month LIBOR. In November 2018, Southern Power repaid one of these short-term loans.
During 2018, Southern Power received approximately $148 million of third-party tax equity related to certain of its renewable facilities. See Note 15 to the financial statements under "Southern Power" for additional information.
Prior to its sale, in the second quarter 2018, Pivotal Utility Holdings caused $200 million aggregate principal amount of gas facility revenue bonds to be redeemed.
In May 2018, Southern Company Gas Capital borrowed $95 million pursuant to a short-term uncommitted bank credit arrangement, guaranteed by Southern Company Gas, bearing interest at a rate agreed upon by Southern Company Gas Capital and the bank from time to time and payable on no less than 30 days' demand by the bank. In July 2018, Southern Company Gas Capital repaid this loan.
Other long-term debt issuances for Southern Company Gas include the issuance by Nicor Gas of $300 million aggregate principal amount of first mortgage bonds in a private placement, of which $100 million was issued in August 2018 and $200 million was issued in November 2018.
In addition to any financings that may be necessary to meet capital requirements and contractual obligations, Southern Company and its subsidiaries plan to continue, when economically feasible, a program to retire higher-cost securities and replace these obligations with lower-cost capital if market conditions permit.
Credit Rating Risk
At December 31, 2018, Southern Company and its subsidiaries did not have any credit arrangements that would require material changes in payment schedules or terminations as a result of a credit rating downgrade.
There are certain contracts that could require collateral, but not accelerated payment, in the event of a credit rating change of certain subsidiaries to BBB and/or Baa2 or below. These contracts are for physical electricity and natural gas purchases and sales, fuel purchases, fuel transportation and storage, energy price risk management, transmission, interest rate management, and construction of new generation at Plant Vogtle Units 3 and 4.

MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS (continued)
Southern Company and Subsidiary Companies 2018 Annual Report


The maximum potential collateral requirements under these contracts at December 31, 2018 were as follows:
Credit Ratings
Maximum
Potential
Collateral
Requirements(a)
 (in millions)
At BBB and/or Baa2$30
At BBB- and/or Baa3$542
At BB+ and/or Ba1(b)
$2,176
(a)
Includes potential collateral requirements related to Gulf Power of $111 million and $221 million at a credit rating of BBB- and/or Baa3 and BB+ and/or Ba1, respectively. See Note 15 to the financial statements under "Southern Company's Sale of Gulf Power" for information regarding the sale of Gulf Power on January 1, 2019.
(b)Any additional credit rating downgrades at or below BB- and/or Ba3 could increase collateral requirements up to an additional $38 million.
Generally, collateral may be provided by a Southern Company guaranty, letter of credit, or cash. Additionally, a credit rating downgrade could impact the ability of Southern Company and its subsidiaries to access capital markets and would be likely to impact the cost at which they do so.
On February 26, 2018, Moody's revised its rating outlook for Mississippi Power from stable to positive. On August 8, 2018, Moody's upgraded Mississippi Power's senior unsecured rating to Baa3 from Ba1 and maintained the positive rating outlook.
On February 28, 2018, Fitch removed Mississippi Power from rating watch negative and revised its rating outlook from stable to positive.
Also on February 28, 2018, Fitch downgraded the senior unsecured long-term debt rating of Southern Company to BBB+ from A- with a stable outlook and of Georgia Power to A from A+ with a negative outlook. On August 9, 2018, Fitch downgraded the senior unsecured long-term debt rating of Georgia Power to A- from A.
On March 14, 2018, S&P upgraded the senior unsecured long-term debt rating of Mississippi Power to A- from BBB+. The outlook remained negative.
On August 8, 2018, Moody's downgraded the senior unsecured debt rating of Georgia Power to Baa1 from A3.
On September 28, 2018, Moody's revised its rating outlooks for Southern Company, Alabama Power, and Georgia Power from negative to stable.
Also on September 28, 2018, Fitch assigned a negative rating outlook to the ratings of Southern Company and its subsidiaries (excluding Mississippi Power).
As a result of the Tax Reform Legislation, certain financial metrics, such as the funds from operations to debt percentage, used by the credit rating agencies to assess Southern Company and its subsidiaries may be negatively impacted. Southern Company and most of its regulated subsidiaries have taken actions to mitigate the resulting impacts, which, among other alternatives, include adjusting capital structure. Absent actions by Southern Company and its subsidiaries that fully mitigate the impacts, the credit ratings of Southern Company and certain of its subsidiaries could be negatively affected. See Note 2 to the financial statements for additional information related to state PSC or other regulatory agency actions related to the Tax Reform Legislation, including approvals of capital structure adjustments for Alabama Power, Georgia Power, and Atlanta Gas Light by their respective state PSCs, which are expected to help mitigate the potential adverse impacts to certain of their credit metrics.
Market Price Risk
The Southern Company system is exposed to market risks, including commodity price risk, interest rate risk, weather risk, and occasionally foreign currency exchange rate risk. To manage the volatility attributable to these exposures, the applicable company nets the exposures, where possible, to take advantage of natural offsets and enters into various derivative transactions for the remaining exposures pursuant to the applicable company's policies in areas such as counterparty exposure and risk management practices. Southern Company Gas' wholesale gas operations use various contracts in its commercial activities that generally meet the definition of derivatives. For the traditional electric operating companies, Southern Power, and Southern Company Gas' other businesses, each company's policy is that derivatives are to be used primarily for hedging purposes and mandates strict adherence to all applicable risk management policies. Derivative positions are monitored using techniques including, but not limited to, market valuation, value at risk, stress testing, and sensitivity analysis.

MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS (continued)
Southern Company and Subsidiary Companies 2018 Annual Report


To mitigate future exposure to a change in interest rates, Southern Company and certain of its subsidiaries enter into derivatives that have been designated as hedges. Derivatives that have been designated as hedges outstanding at December 31, 2018 have a notional amount of $2.0 billion and are intended to mitigate interest rate volatility related to existing fixed rate obligations. The weighted average interest rate on $5.8 billion of long-term variable interest rate exposure at December 31, 2018 was 3.02%. If Southern Company sustained a 100 basis point change in interest rates for all long-term variable interest rate exposure, the change would affect annualized interest expense by approximately $58 million at December 31, 2018. See Note 1 to the financial statements under "Financial Instruments" and Note 14 to the financial statements for additional information.
Southern Power Company had foreign currency denominated debt of €1.1 billion at December 31, 2018. Southern Power Company has mitigated its exposure to foreign currency exchange rate risk through the use of foreign currency swaps converting all interest and principal payments to fixed-rate U.S. dollars.
Due to cost-based rate regulation and other various cost recovery mechanisms, the traditional electric operating companies and natural gas distribution utilities continue to have limited exposure to market volatility in interest rates, foreign currency exchange rates, commodity fuel prices, and prices of electricity. In addition, Southern Power's exposure to market volatility in commodity fuel prices and prices of electricity is limited because its long-term sales contracts shift substantially all fuel cost responsibility to the purchaser. However, Southern Power has been and may continue to be exposed to market volatility in energy-related commodity prices as a result of uncontracted generating capacity. To mitigate residual risks relative to movements in electricity prices, the traditional electric operating companies and Southern Power may enter into physical fixed-price contracts for the purchase and sale of electricity through the wholesale electricity market and, to a lesser extent, financial hedge contracts for natural gas purchases; however, a significant portion of contracts are priced at market. The traditional electric operating companies and certain of the natural gas distribution utilities manage fuel-hedging programs implemented per the guidelines of their respective state PSCs or other applicable state regulatory agencies. Southern Company had no material change in market risk exposure for the year ended December 31, 2018 when compared to the year ended December 31, 2017.
The changes in fair value of energy-related derivative contracts are substantially attributable to both the volume and the price of natural gas. For the years ended December 31, the changes in fair value of energy-related derivative contracts, the majority of which are composed of regulatory hedges, were as follows:
 2018 2017
 (in millions)
Contracts outstanding at the beginning of the period, assets (liabilities), net$(163) $41
Contracts realized or settled93
 (8)
Current period changes(a)
(131) (196)
Contracts outstanding at the end of the period, assets (liabilities), net(b)(c)
$(201) $(163)
(a)Current period changes also include the changes in fair value of new contracts entered into during the period, if any.
(b)Excludes premium and intrinsic value associated with weather derivatives of $8 million and $11 million at December 31, 2018 and 2017, respectively.
(c)
Includes $6 million of net liabilities related to Gulf Power. See Note 15 to the financial statements under "Southern Company's Sale of Gulf Power" for information regarding the sale of Gulf Power on January 1, 2019.
The net hedge volumes of energy-related derivative contracts were 431 million mmBtu and 621 million mmBtu at December 31, 2018 and 2017, respectively.
For the traditional electric operating companies and Southern Power, the weighted average swap contract cost above market prices was approximately $0.12 per mmBtu at December 31, 2018 and $0.15 per mmBtu at December 31, 2017. The majority of the natural gas hedge gains and losses are recovered through the traditional electric operating companies' fuel cost recovery clauses.
At December 31, 2018 and 2017, a portion of the Southern Company system's energy-related derivative contracts were designated as regulatory hedges and were related to the applicable company's fuel-hedging program. Therefore, gains and losses are initially recorded as regulatory liabilities and assets, respectively, and then are included in fuel expense as they are recovered through the energy cost recovery clause. Certain other gains and losses on energy-related derivatives, designated as cash flow hedges, are initially deferred in OCI before being recognized in income in the same period as the hedged transaction. Gains and losses on energy-related derivative contracts that are not designated or fail to qualify as hedges are recognized in the statements of income as incurred. See Note 14 to the financial statements for additional information.
The Southern Company system uses exchange-traded market-observable contracts, which are categorized as Level 1 of the fair value hierarchy, and over-the-counter contracts that are not exchange traded but are fair valued using prices which are market

MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS (continued)
Southern Company and Subsidiary Companies 2018 Annual Report


observable, and thus fall into Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy. See Note 13 to the financial statements for further discussion of fair value measurements. The maturities of the energy-related derivative contracts at December 31, 2018 were as follows:
 Fair Value Measurements
 December 31, 2018
 
Total
Fair Value
 Maturity
  Year 1 Years 2&3 Years 4&5
 (in millions)
Level 1$(179) $(59) $(86) $(34)
Level 2(22) 20
 (17) (25)
Level 3
 
 
 
Fair value of contracts outstanding at end of period$(201) $(39) $(103) $(59)
The Southern Company system is exposed to market price risk in the event of nonperformance by counterparties to energy-related and interest rate derivative contracts. The Southern Company system only enters into agreements and material transactions with counterparties that have investment grade credit ratings by Moody's and S&P, or with counterparties who have posted collateral to cover potential credit exposure. Therefore, the Southern Company system does not anticipate market risk exposure from nonperformance by the counterparties. For additional information, see Note 1 to the financial statements under "Financial Instruments" and Note 14 to the financial statements.
With the exception of Southern Company Gas' subsidiary, Atlanta Gas Light, and the Southern Company Gas wholesale gas services business, the Southern Company system is not exposed to concentrations of credit risk. Concentration of credit risk occurs at Atlanta Gas Light for amounts billed for services and other costs to its customers, which consist of 15 Marketers in Georgia responsible for the retail sale of natural gas to end-use customers in Georgia. For 2018, the four largest Marketers based on customer count, which includes SouthStar, accounted for 20% of Southern Company Gas' adjusted operating margin. Southern Company Gas' wholesale gas services business has a concentration of credit risk for services it provides to its counterparties as measured by its 30-day receivable exposure plus forward exposure. At December 31, 2018, Southern Company Gas' wholesale gas services business' top 20 counterparties represented approximately 48%, or $298 million, of its total counterparty exposure and had a weighted average S&P equivalent credit rating of A-, all of which is consistent with the prior year.
Southern Company performs periodic reviews of its leveraged lease transactions, both domestic and international, and the creditworthiness of the lessees, including a review of the value of the underlying leased assets and the credit ratings of the lessees. Southern Company's domestic lease transactions generally do not have any credit enhancement mechanisms; however, the lessees in its international lease transactions have pledged various deposits as additional security to secure the obligations. The lessees in Southern Company's international lease transactions are also required to provide additional collateral in the event of a credit downgrade below a certain level.
Capital Requirements and Contractual Obligations
The Southern Company system's construction program is currently estimated to total approximately $8.0 billion for 2019, $7.7 billion for 2020, $6.7 billion for 2021, $6.3 billion for 2022, and $6.0 billion for 2023. These amounts include expenditures of approximately $1.5 billion, $1.2 billion, $1.0 billion, and $0.5 billion for the construction of Plant Vogtle Units 3 and 4 in 2019, 2020, 2021, and 2022, respectively. These amounts do not include up to approximately $0.5 billion per year on average for 2019 through 2023 for Southern Power's planned expenditures for plant acquisitions and placeholder growth. These amounts also include capital expenditures related to contractual purchase commitments for nuclear fuel and capital expenditures covered under LTSAs. Estimated capital expenditures to comply with environmental laws and regulations included in these amounts are $0.5 billion, $0.2 billion, $0.3 billion, $0.3 billion, and $0.2 billion for 2019, 2020, 2021, 2022, and 2023, respectively. These estimated expenditures do not include any potential compliance costs associated with pending regulation of CO2 emissions from fossil fuel-fired electric generating units. See FUTURE EARNINGS POTENTIAL – "Environmental MattersEnvironmental Laws and Regulations" and " – Global Climate Issues" herein for additional information.
The traditional electric operating companies also anticipate costs associated with closure and monitoring of ash ponds in accordance with the CCR Rule, which are reflected in Southern Company's ARO liabilities. These costs, which are expected to change and could change materially as underlying assumptions are refined and the cost and the method and timing of compliance activities continue to be evaluated, are currently estimated to be approximately $0.5 billion, $0.5 billion, $0.7 billion, $0.9 billion, and $0.9 billion for 2019, 2020, 2021, 2022, and 2023, respectively. See FUTURE EARNINGS POTENTIAL – "Environmental

MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS (continued)
Southern Company and Subsidiary Companies 2018 Annual Report


MattersEnvironmental Laws and RegulationsCoal Combustion Residuals" herein and Note 6 to the financial statements for additional information.
The construction programs are subject to periodic review and revision, and actual construction costs may vary from these estimates because of numerous factors. These factors include: changes in business conditions; changes in load projections; changes in environmental laws and regulations; the outcome of any legal challenges to environmental rules; changes in electric generating plants, including unit retirements and replacements and adding or changing fuel sources at existing electric generating units, to meet regulatory requirements; changes in FERC rules and regulations; state regulatory agency approvals; changes in the expected environmental compliance program; changes in legislation; the cost and efficiency of construction labor, equipment, and materials; project scope and design changes; storm impacts; and the cost of capital. In addition, there can be no assurance that costs related to capital expenditures will be fully recovered. Additionally, planned expenditures for plant acquisitions may vary due to market opportunities and Southern Power's ability to execute its growth strategy. See Note 15 to the financial statements under "Southern Power" for additional information regarding Southern Power's plant acquisitions.
The construction program also includes Plant Vogtle Units 3 and 4, which includes components based on new technology that only recently began initial operation in the global nuclear industry at this scale and which may be subject to additional revised cost estimates during construction. The ability to control costs and avoid cost and schedule overruns during the development, construction, and operation of new facilities is subject to a number of factors, including, but not limited to, changes in labor costs, availability, and productivity; challenges with management of contractors, subcontractors, or vendors; adverse weather conditions; shortages, increased costs, or inconsistent quality of equipment, materials, and labor; contractor or supplier delay; non-performance under construction, operating, or other agreements; operational readiness, including specialized operator training and required site safety programs; engineering or design problems; design and other licensing-based compliance matters, including the timely resolution of ITAAC and the related approvals by the NRC; challenges with start-up activities, including major equipment failure and system integration; and/or operational performance. See Note 2 to the financial statements under "Georgia PowerNuclear Construction" for information regarding Plant Vogtle Units 3 and 4 and additional factors that may impact construction expenditures.
As a result of NRC requirements, Alabama Power and Georgia Power have external trust funds for nuclear decommissioning costs; however, Alabama Power currently has no additional funding requirements. For additional information, see Note 6 to the financial statements under "Nuclear Decommissioning."
In addition, as discussed in Note 11 to the financial statements, the Southern Company system provides postretirement benefits to the majority of its employees and funds trusts to the extent required by PSCs, other applicable state regulatory agencies, or the FERC.
Funding requirements related to obligations associated with scheduled maturities of long-term debt, as well as the related interest, derivative obligations, preferred stock dividends of subsidiaries, leases, pipeline charges, storage capacity, gas supply, asset management agreements, other purchase commitments, ARO settlements, and trusts are detailed in the contractual obligations table that follows. See Notes 1, 6, 8, 9, 11, and 14 to the financial statements for additional information.

MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS (continued)
Southern Company and Subsidiary Companies 2018 Annual Report


Contractual Obligations
The Southern Company system's contractual obligations at December 31, 2018 (excluding Gulf Power) were as follows:
 2019 2020- 2021 2022- 2023 After 2023 Total
 (in millions)
Long-term debt(a) —
         
Principal$3,133
 $7,204
 $4,354
 $28,950
 $43,641
Interest1,668
 3,082
 2,270
 25,796
 32,816
Preferred stock dividends of subsidiaries(b)
15
 29
 29
 
 73
Financial derivative obligations(c)
610
 243
 109
 
 962
Operating leases(d)
156
 244
 177
 1,040
 1,617
Capital leases(d)
25
 22
 8
 143
 198
Pipeline charges, storage capacity, and gas supply(e)
781
 1,104
 901
 1,871
 4,657
Asset management agreements(f)
10
 8
 
 
 18
Purchase commitments 
        

Capital(g)
7,600
 13,608
 11,486
 
 32,694
Fuel(h)
3,168
 3,854
 1,863
 5,862
 14,747
Purchased power(i)
304
 653
 545
 2,494
 3,996
Other(j)
328
 642
 464
 2,265
 3,699
ARO settlements(k)
451
 1,186
 1,841
 
 3,478
Trusts —        

Nuclear decommissioning(l)
5
 11
 11
 88
 115
Pension and other postretirement benefit plans(m)
137
 265
 
 
 402
Total$18,391
 $32,155
 $24,058
 $68,509
 $143,113
(a)
All amounts are reflected based on final maturity dates except for amounts related to FFB borrowings and certain revenue bonds. As it relates to the FFB borrowings, the final maturity date is February 20, 2044; however, principal amortization is reflected beginning in 2020. See Note 8 to the financial statements under "Long-term DebtDOE Loan Guarantee Borrowings" and "Securities Due Within One Year" for additional information. Southern Company and its subsidiaries plan to continue, when economically feasible, to retire higher-cost securities and replace these obligations with lower-cost capital if market conditions permit. Variable rate interest obligations are estimated based on rates at December 31, 2018, as reflected in the statements of capitalization. Fixed rates include, where applicable, the effects of interest rate derivatives employed to manage interest rate risk. Long-term debt excludes capital lease amounts (shown separately).
(b)Represents preferred stock of Alabama Power. Preferred stock does not mature; therefore, amounts are provided for the next five years only.
(c)See Notes 1 and 14 to the financial statements.
(d)Excludes PPAs that are accounted for as leases and included in "Purchased power."
(e)Includes charges recoverable through a natural gas cost recovery mechanism, or alternatively billed to Marketers selling retail natural gas, and demand charges associated with Southern Company Gas' wholesale gas services. The gas supply balance includes amounts for gas commodity purchase commitments associated with Southern Company Gas' gas marketing services of 47 million mmBtu at floating gas prices calculated using forward natural gas prices at December 31, 2018 and valued at $150 million. Southern Company Gas provides guarantees to certain gas suppliers for certain of its subsidiaries in support of payment obligations.
(f)Represents fixed-fee minimum payments for asset management agreements associated with wholesale gas services.
(g)
The Southern Company system provides estimated capital expenditures for a five-year period, including capital expenditures associated with environmental regulations. These amounts exclude contractual purchase commitments for nuclear fuel, capital expenditures covered under LTSAs, and estimated capital expenditures for AROs, which are reflected in "Fuel," "Other," and "ARO settlements," respectively. These amounts also exclude up to approximately $0.5 billion per year on average for 2019 through 2023 for Southern Power's planned expenditures for plant acquisitions and placeholder growth. At December 31, 2018, significant purchase commitments were outstanding in connection with the construction program. See FUTURE EARNINGS POTENTIAL – "Environmental MattersEnvironmental Laws and Regulations" and "Construction Programs" herein for additional information.
(h)Primarily includes commitments to purchase coal, nuclear fuel, and natural gas, as well as the related transportation and storage. In most cases, these contracts contain provisions for price escalation, minimum purchase levels, and other financial commitments. Natural gas purchase commitments are based on various indices at the time of delivery. Amounts reflected for natural gas purchase commitments have been estimated based on the NYMEX future prices at December 31, 2018.
(i)
Estimated minimum long-term obligations for various PPA purchases from gas-fired, biomass, and wind-powered facilities and capacity payments related to Plant Vogtle Units 1 and 2. See Note 9 to the financial statements under "Fuel and Power Purchase Agreements" for additional information.

MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS (continued)
Southern Company and Subsidiary Companies 2018 Annual Report


(j)Includes LTSAs, contracts for the procurement of limestone, contractual environmental remediation liabilities, and operation and maintenance agreements. LTSAs include price escalation based on inflation indices.
(k)
Represents estimated costs for a five-year period associated with closing and monitoring ash ponds in accordance with the CCR Rule and the related state rules, which are reflected in Southern Company's ARO liabilities. Material expenditures in future years for ARO settlements also will be required for ash ponds, nuclear decommissioning, and other liabilities reflected in Southern Company's AROs. See FUTURE EARNINGS POTENTIAL – "Environmental MattersEnvironmental Laws and RegulationsCoal Combustion Residuals" herein and Note 6 to the financial statements for additional information.
(l)
Projections of nuclear decommissioning trust fund contributions for Plant Hatch and Plant Vogtle Units 1 and 2 are based on the 2013 ARP for Georgia Power. Alabama Power also has external trust funds for nuclear decommissioning costs; however, Alabama Power currently has no additional funding requirements. See Note 6 to the financial statements under "Nuclear Decommissioning" for additional information.
(m)The Southern Company system forecasts contributions to the pension and other postretirement benefit plans over a three-year period. Southern Company anticipates no mandatory contributions to the qualified pension plans during the next three years. Amounts presented represent estimated benefit payments for the nonqualified pension plans, estimated non-trust benefit payments for the other postretirement benefit plans, and estimated contributions to the other postretirement benefit plan trusts, all of which will be made from corporate assets of Southern Company's subsidiaries. See Note 11 to the financial statements for additional information related to the pension and other postretirement benefit plans, including estimated benefit payments. Certain benefit payments will be made through the related benefit plans. Other benefit payments will be made from corporate assets of Southern Company's subsidiaries.

MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
Alabama Power Company 2018 Annual Report



OVERVIEW
Business Activities
Alabama Power operates as a vertically integrated utility providing electric service to retail and wholesale customers within its traditional service territory located in the State of Alabama in addition to wholesale customers in the Southeast.
Many factors affect the opportunities, challenges, and risks of Alabama Power's business of providing electric service. These factors include the ability to maintain a constructive regulatory environment, to maintain and grow energy sales and customers, and to effectively manage and secure timely recovery of costs. These costs include those related to projected long-term demand growth, stringent environmental standards, including CCR rules, reliability, fuel, capital expenditures, including improving the electric transmission and distribution systems, and restoration following major storms. Alabama Power has various regulatory mechanisms that operate to address cost recovery. Effectively operating pursuant to these regulatory mechanisms and appropriately balancing required costs and capital expenditures with customer prices will continue to challenge Alabama Power for the foreseeable future. On May 1, 2018, the Alabama PSC approved modifications to Rate RSE and other commitments designed to position Alabama Power to address the retail rate impact and the growing pressure on its credit quality resulting from the Tax Reform Legislation. See FUTURE EARNINGS POTENTIAL – "Retail Regulatory Matters" and FINANCIAL CONDITION AND LIQUIDITY – "Credit Rating Risk" herein for additional information.
Alabama Power continues to focus on several key performance indicators including, but not limited to, customer satisfaction, plant availability, system reliability, and net income after dividends on preferred stock. Alabama Power's financial success is directly tied to customer satisfaction. Key elements of ensuring customer satisfaction include outstanding service, high reliability, and competitive prices. Management uses customer satisfaction surveys to evaluate Alabama Power's results and generally targets the top quartile of these surveys in measuring performance.
See RESULTS OF OPERATIONS herein for information on Alabama Power's financial performance.
Earnings
Alabama Power's 2018 net income after dividends on preferred and preference stock increased $1was $930 million, representing an $82 million, or 5.9%9.7%, increase over the previous year. The increase was primarily due to a decrease in income tax expense, partially offset by a decrease in retail revenues associated with customer bill credits related to the Tax Reform Legislation. The increase also reflects an increase in revenues associated with colder weather in the first quarter 2018 and warmer weather in the second and third quarters 2018 compared to the corresponding periods in 2017, partially offset by an accrual for a Rate RSE refund. See FUTURE EARNINGS POTENTIAL – "Retail Regulatory Matters – Rate RSE" herein for additional information.
Alabama Power's 2017 net income after dividends on preferred and preference stock was $848 million, representing a $26 million, or 3.2%, increase over the previous year. The increase was primarily due to an increase in rates under Rate RSE effective in January 2017 and the impact of a Rate RSE refund recorded in 2016. These increases to income were partially offset by a decrease in retail revenues associated with milder weather, lower customer usage, and an increase in non-fuel operations and maintenance expenses in 2017 as compared to 2016. See FUTURE EARNINGS POTENTIAL – "Retail Regulatory Matters – Rate RSE" herein for additional information.

MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS (continued)
Alabama Power Company 2018 Annual Report

RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
A condensed income statement for Alabama Power follows:
 Amount 
Increase (Decrease)
from Prior Year
 2018 2018 2017
 (in millions)
Operating revenues$6,032
 $(7) $150
Fuel1,301
 76
 (72)
Purchased power432
 104
 (6)
Other operations and maintenance1,669
 (40) 152
Depreciation and amortization764
 28
 33
Taxes other than income taxes389
 5
 4
Total operating expenses4,555
 173
 111
Operating income1,477
 (180) 39
Allowance for equity funds used during construction62
 23
 11
Interest expense, net of amounts capitalized323
 18
 3
Other income (expense), net20
 (23) 17
Income taxes291
 (277) 37
Net income945
 79
 27
Dividends on preferred and preference stock15
 (3) 1
Net income after dividends on preferred and preference stock$930
 $82
 $26
Operating Revenues
Operating revenues for 2018 were $6.0 billion, reflecting a $7 million decrease from 2017. Details of operating revenues were as follows:
 2018 2017
 (in millions)
Retail — prior year$5,458
 $5,322
Estimated change resulting from —   
Rates and pricing(354) 362
Sales decline(10) (44)
Weather137
 (89)
Fuel and other cost recovery136
 (93)
Retail — current year5,367
 5,458
Wholesale revenues —   
Non-affiliates279
 276
Affiliates119
 97
Total wholesale revenues398
 373
Other operating revenues267
 208
Total operating revenues$6,032
 $6,039
Percent change(0.1)% 2.6%
Retail revenues in 2018 were $5.4 billion. These revenues decreased $91 million, or 1.7%, in 2018 as compared to the prior year. The decrease in 2018 was primarily due to customer bill credits related to the Tax Reform Legislation and an accrual for a Rate RSE refund, partially offset by an increase in fuel revenues and colder weather in the first quarter and warmer weather in the second and third quarters 2018 as compared to the corresponding periods in 2017.

MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS (continued)
Alabama Power Company 2018 Annual Report

Retail revenues in 2017 were $5.5 billion. These revenues increased $136 million, or 2.6%, in 2017 as compared to the prior year. DividendsThe increase in 2017 was primarily due to an increase in rates under Rate RSE effective in January 2017, partially offset by a decrease in fuel revenues and milder weather in the first and third quarters 2017 as compared to the corresponding periods in 2016.
See Note 2 to the financial statements under "Alabama Power – Rate RSE" for additional information. See "Energy Sales" herein for a discussion of changes in the volume of energy sold, including changes related to sales decline and weather.
Electric rates include provisions to recognize the recovery of fuel costs, purchased power costs, PPAs certificated by the Alabama PSC, and costs associated with the natural disaster reserve. Under these provisions, fuel and other cost recovery revenues generally equal fuel and other cost recovery expenses and do not affect net income. See FUTURE EARNINGS POTENTIAL – "Retail Regulatory Matters – Rate ECR" herein for additional information.
Wholesale revenues from power sales to non-affiliated utilities were as follows:
 2018 2017 2016
 (in millions)
Capacity and other$101
 $96
 $93
Energy178
 180
 190
Total non-affiliated$279
 $276
 $283
Wholesale revenues from sales to non-affiliates will vary depending on preferredfuel prices, the market prices of wholesale energy compared to the cost of Alabama Power's and preference stock decreased $9the Southern Company system's generation, demand for energy within the Southern Company system's electric service territory, and availability of the Southern Company system's generation. Increases and decreases in energy revenues that are driven by fuel prices are accompanied by an increase or decrease in fuel costs and do not affect net income. Short-term opportunity energy sales are also included in wholesale energy sales to non-affiliates. These opportunity sales are made at market-based rates that generally provide a margin above Alabama Power's variable cost to produce the energy.
In 2018, wholesale revenues from sales to non-affiliates increased $3 million, or 34.6%1.1%, as compared to the prior year. In 2017, wholesale revenues from sales to non-affiliates decreased $7 million, or 2.5%, as compared to the prior year.
Wholesale revenues from sales to affiliated companies will vary depending on demand and the availability and cost of generating resources at each company. These affiliate sales and purchases are made in accordance with the IIC, as approved by the FERC. These transactions do not have a significant impact on earnings since this energy is generally sold at marginal cost and energy purchases are generally offset by energy revenues through Alabama Power's energy cost recovery clause.
In 2018, wholesale revenues from sales to affiliates increased $22 million, or 22.7%, as compared to the prior year. In 2018, the price of energy increased 12.3% as a result of higher natural gas prices and KWH sales increased 10.0% primarily due to an increase in hydro generation. In 2017, wholesale revenues from sales to affiliates increased $28 million, or 40.6%, as compared to the prior year. In 2017, KWH sales increased 31.1% as a result of supporting Southern Company system transmission reliability and a 6.9% increase in the price of energy primarily due to higher natural gas prices.
In 2018, other operating revenues increased $59 million, or 28.4%, as compared to the prior year primarily due to revenues related to unregulated sales of products and services that were reclassified as other revenues as a result of the adoption of ASC 606, Revenue from Contracts with Customers (ASC 606). In prior periods, these revenues were included in other income (expense), net. See Note 1 to the financial statements for additional information regarding Alabama Power's adoption of ASC 606. This increase was partially offset by decreases in open access transmission tariff revenues primarily due to a lower rate related to the Tax Reform Legislation.

MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS (continued)
Alabama Power Company 2018 Annual Report

Energy Sales
Changes in revenues are influenced heavily by the change in the volume of energy sold from year to year. KWH sales for 2018 and the percent change from the prior year were as follows:
 
Total
KWHs
 
Total KWH
Percent Change
 
Weather-Adjusted
Percent Change
 2018 2018 2017 2018 2017
 (in billions)        
Residential18.6
 8.2% (6.1)% (0.4)% (1.2)%
Commercial13.9
 1.9
 (3.4) (1.0) (1.3)
Industrial23.0
 1.4
 1.7
 1.4
 1.7
Other0.2
 (5.7) (5.0) (5.7) (5.0)
Total retail55.7
 3.7
 (2.3) 0.2 % (0.1)%
Wholesale         
Non-affiliates5.0
 (8.7) (6.5)    
Affiliates4.6
 9.6
 31.1
    
Total wholesale9.6
 (0.9) 6.6
    
Total energy sales65.3
 3.0% (1.0)%    
Changes in retail energy sales are generally the result of changes in electricity usage by customers, changes in weather, and changes in the number of customers. Retail energy sales in 2018 were 3.7% higher than in 2017. Residential sales and commercial sales increased 8.2% and 1.9% in 2018, respectively, primarily due to colder weather in the first quarter and warmer weather in the second and third quarters 2018 as compared to the corresponding periods in 2017. Weather-adjusted residential sales were 0.4% lower in 2018 primarily due to lower customer usage resulting from an increase in penetration of energy-efficient residential appliances. Weather-adjusted commercial sales were 1.0% lower in 2018 primarily due to lower customer usage resulting from customer initiatives in energy savings and an ongoing migration to the electronic commerce business model. Industrial sales increased 1.4% in 2018 as compared to 2017 as a result of an increase in demand resulting from changes in production levels primarily in the primary metals, pipelines, and mining sectors offset by the paper sector.
Retail energy sales in 2017 were 2.3% lower than in 2016. Residential sales and commercial sales decreased 6.1% and 3.4% in 2017, respectively, primarily due to milder weather in the first and third quarters 2017 as compared to the corresponding periods in 2016. Weather-adjusted residential sales were 1.2% lower in 2017 primarily due to lower customer usage resulting from an increase in penetration of energy-efficient residential appliances, partially offset by customer growth. Weather-adjusted commercial sales were 1.3% lower in 2017 primarily due to lower customer usage resulting from customer initiatives in energy savings and an ongoing migration to the electronic commerce business model, partially offset by customer growth. Industrial sales increased 1.7% in 2017 as compared to 2016 as a result of an increase in demand resulting from changes in production levels primarily in the primary metals, chemicals, and mining sectors offset by the pipelines and paper sectors.
See "Operating Revenues" above for a discussion of significant changes in wholesale revenues from sales to non-affiliates and wholesale revenues from sales to affiliated companies related to changes in price and KWH sales.
Fuel and Purchased Power Expenses
The mix of fuel sources for generation of electricity is determined primarily by the unit cost of fuel consumed, demand, and the availability of generating units. Additionally, Alabama Power purchases a portion of its electricity needs from the wholesale market.

MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS (continued)
Alabama Power Company 2018 Annual Report

Details of Alabama Power's generation and purchased power were as follows:
 2018 2017 2016
Total generation (in billions of KWHs)
60.5
 60.3
 60.2
Total purchased power (in billions of KWHs)
8.1
 6.4
 7.1
Sources of generation (percent) —
     
Coal50
 50
 53
Nuclear23
 24
 23
Gas19
 20
 19
Hydro8
 6
 5
Cost of fuel, generated (in cents per net KWH) —
     
Coal2.73
 2.60
 2.75
Nuclear0.77
 0.75
 0.78
Gas2.84
 2.72
 2.67
Average cost of fuel, generated (in cents per net KWH)(a)(b)
2.26
 2.14
 2.26
Average cost of purchased power (in cents per net KWH)(c)
5.47
 5.29
 4.80
(a)For 2018, cost of fuel, generated and average cost of fuel, generated excludes a $30 million adjustment associated with a May 2018 Alabama PSC accounting order related to excess deferred income taxes. See FUTURE EARNINGS POTENTIAL – "Retail Regulatory Matters – Tax Reform Accounting Order" herein for additional information.
(b)KWHs generated by hydro are excluded from the average cost of fuel, generated.
(c)Average cost of purchased power includes fuel, energy, and transmission purchased by Alabama Power for tolling agreements where power is generated by the provider.
Fuel and purchased power expenses were $1.73 billion in 2018, an increase of $180 million, or 11.6%, compared to 2017. The increase was primarily due to an $81 million net increase related to the volume of KWHs purchased and generated, a $54 million increase in the average cost of fuel, and a $15 million increase in the average cost of purchased power.
In addition, fuel expense increased $30 million in 2018 as a result of an Alabama PSC accounting order authorizing the amortization of a regulatory liability to offset under recovered fuel costs. See FUTURE EARNINGS POTENTIAL – "Retail Regulatory Matters – Tax Reform Accounting Order" herein for additional information.
Fuel and purchased power expenses were $1.55 billion in 2017, a decrease of $78 million, or 4.8%, compared to 2016. The decrease was primarily due to a $67 million net decrease related to the volume of KWHs generated and purchased and a $42 million decrease in the average cost of fuel, partially offset by a $31 million increase in the average cost of purchased power.
Fuel and purchased power energy transactions do not have a significant impact on earnings, since energy expenses are generally offset by energy revenues through Alabama Power's energy cost recovery clause. Alabama Power, along with the Alabama PSC, continuously monitors the under/over recovered balance to determine whether adjustments to billing rates are required. See Note 2 to the financial statements under "Alabama Power – Rate ECR" for additional information.
Fuel
Fuel expenses were $1.3 billion in 2018, an increase of $76 million, or 6.2%, compared to 2017. The increase was primarily due to a 5.0% increase in the average cost of KWHs generated by coal and a 4.4% increase in the average cost of KWHs generated by natural gas, which excludes tolling agreements. These increases were partially offset by a 28.3% increase in the volume of KWHs generated by hydro and a 2.1% decrease in the volume of KWHs generated by natural gas. Fuel expenses were $1.2 billion in 2017, a decrease of $72 million, or 5.6%, compared to 2016. The decrease was primarily due to a 12.2% increase in the volume of KWHs generated by hydro, a 5.8% decrease in the volume of KWHs generated by coal, and a 5.5% and 3.9% decrease in the average cost of KWHs generated by coal and nuclear fuel, respectively. These decreases were partially offset by an 8.1% increase in the volume of KWHs generated by nuclear fuel and a 4.0% increase in the volume of KWHs generated by natural gas.
In addition, fuel expense increased $30 million in 2018 as a result of an Alabama PSC accounting order authorizing the amortization of a regulatory liability to offset under recovered fuel costs. See FUTURE EARNINGS POTENTIAL – "Retail Regulatory Matters – Tax Reform Accounting Order" herein for additional information.

MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS (continued)
Alabama Power Company 2018 Annual Report

Purchased Power Non-Affiliates
Purchased power expense from non-affiliates was $216 million in 2018, an increase of $46 million, or 27.1%, compared to 2017. This increase was primarily due to an 18.9% increase in the amount of energy purchased due to colder weather in the first quarter and warmer weather in the second and third quarters 2018 as compared to the corresponding periods in 2017 and a 6.6% increase in the average cost per KWH purchased due to higher natural gas prices. Purchased power expense from non-affiliates was $170 million in 2017, an increase of $4 million, or 2.4%, compared to 2016.
Energy purchases from non-affiliates will vary depending on the market prices of wholesale energy as compared to the cost of the Southern Company system's generation, demand for energy within the Southern Company system's service territory, and the availability of the Southern Company system's generation.
Purchased Power Affiliates
Purchased power expense from affiliates was $216 million in 2018, an increase of $58 million, or 36.7%, compared to 2017. This increase was primarily due to a 34.5% increase in the amount of energy purchased due to colder weather in the first quarter and warmer weather in the second and third quarters 2018 as compared to the corresponding periods in 2017 and a 1.4% increase in the average cost per KWH purchased due to higher natural gas prices. Purchased power expense from affiliates was $158 million in 2017, a decrease of $10 million, or 6.0%, compared to 2016. This decrease was primarily due to a 17.2% decrease in the amount of energy purchased due to milder weather partially offset by a 13.9% increase in the average cost per KWH purchased due to higher natural gas prices.
Energy purchases from affiliates will vary depending on demand for energy and the availability and cost of generating resources at each company within the Southern Company system. These purchases are made in accordance with the IIC or other contractual agreements, as approved by the FERC.
Other Operations and Maintenance Expenses
In 2018, other operations and maintenance expenses decreased $40 million, or 2.3%, as compared to the prior year. Generation costs decreased $34 million primarily due to fewer outages resulting in lower costs. Employee benefit costs, including pension costs, decreased $26 million primarily due to lower active medical costs. Customer service costs decreased $10 million primarily due to cost-saving initiatives. These decreases were partially offset by a $47 million increase in expenses from unregulated sales of products and services that were reclassified as other operations and maintenance expenses as a result of the adoption of ASC 606. In prior periods, these expenses were included in other income (expense), net. See Note 1 to the financial statements under "Revenue" for additional information.
In 2017, other operations and maintenance expenses increased $152 million, or 9.8%, as compared to the prior year. Distribution and transmission expenses increased $58 million primarily due to vegetation management expenses. Generation costs increased $38 million primarily due to outage costs. Employee benefit costs, including pension costs, increased $32 million.
See Note 11 to the financial statements under "Pension Plans" for additional information.
Depreciation and Amortization
Depreciation and amortization increased $28 million, or 3.8%, in 20162018 as compared to the prior year primarily due to additional plant in service related to distribution, transmission, compliance-related steam, and other generation production projects. Depreciation and amortization increased $33 million, or 4.7%, in 2017 as compared to the prior year primarily due to additional plant in service and an increase in generation-related depreciation rates, effective January 1, 2017, associated with compliance-related steam projects and ARO recovery, partially offset by a decrease in distribution-related depreciation rates. See Note 5 to the financial statements under "Depreciation and Amortization" for additional information.
Allowance for Equity Funds Used During Construction
AFUDC equity increased $23 million, or 59.0%, in 2018 as compared to the prior year. The decreaseincrease was primarily associated with steam and transmission construction projects. AFUDC equity increased $11 million, or 39.3%, in 2017 as compared to the prior year. The increase was primarily associated with steam, transmission, and nuclear construction projects. See Note 1 to financial statements under "Allowance for Funds Used During Construction" for additional information.
Interest Expense, Net of Amounts Capitalized
Interest expense, net of amounts capitalized increased $18 million, or 5.9%, in 2018 as compared to the prior year primarily due to an increase in debt outstanding and higher interest rates, partially offset by an increase in the redemptionamounts capitalized. Interest

MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS (continued)
Alabama Power Company 2018 Annual Report

expense, net of amounts capitalized increased $3 million, or 1.0%, in May 20152017 as compared to the prior year. See FUTURE EARNINGS POTENTIAL – "Financing Activities" herein for additional information.
Other Income (Expense), Net
Other income (expense), net decreased $23 million, or 53.5%, in 2018 as compared to the prior year primarily due to an increase in charitable donations and the reclassification of certain seriesrevenues and expenses associated with unregulated sales of preferredproducts and preference stock.services to other revenues and operations and maintenance expenses, respectively, as a result of the adoption of ASC 606. See Note 61 to the financial statements under "Redeemable Preferred and Preference Stock""Revenue" for additional information. Other income (expense), net increased $17 million, or 65.4%, in 2017 as compared to the prior year primarily due to increases in unregulated lighting services and a decrease in the non-service cost components of net periodic pension and other postretirement benefits costs. See Note 1 to the financial statements under "Recently Adopted Accounting Standards" and Note 11 to the financial statements for additional information on net periodic pension and other postretirement benefit costs.
Income Taxes
Income taxes decreased $277 million, or 48.8%, in 2018 as compared to the prior year primarily due to the reduction in the federal income tax rate, the benefit from the flowback of excess deferred income taxes as a result of the Tax Reform Legislation, and lower pre-tax earnings. Income taxes increased $37 million, or 7.0%, in 2017 as compared to the prior year primarily due to higher pre-tax earnings, an increase related to prior year tax return actualization, and an increase in income tax reserves, partially offset by an increase in state income tax credits. The impact to net income as a result of the Tax Reform Legislation was not material due to the application of regulatory accounting. See FUTURE EARNINGS POTENTIAL – "Income Tax Matters – Federal Tax Reform Legislation" herein and Note 10 to the financial statements for additional information.
Effects of Inflation
The CompanyAlabama Power is subject to rate regulation that is generally based on the recovery of historical and projected costs. The effects of inflation can create an economic loss since the recovery of costs could be in dollars that have less purchasing power. Any adverse effect of inflation on the Company'sAlabama Power's results of operations has not been substantial in recent years. See Note 32 to the financial statements under "Retail Regulatory Matters"Alabama Power – Rate RSE" for additional information.
FUTURE EARNINGS POTENTIAL
General
The CompanyAlabama Power operates as a vertically integrated utility providing electric service to retail and wholesale customers within its traditional service territory located in the State of Alabama and to wholesale customers in the Southeast. Prices for electric service provided by the CompanyAlabama Power to retail customers are set by the Alabama PSC under cost-based regulatory principles. Retail rates and earnings are reviewed and may be adjusted periodically within certain limitations. Prices for wholesale electric service, interconnecting transmission lines, and the exchange of electric power are regulated by the FERC. Retail rates and earnings are reviewed and may be adjusted periodically within certain limitations. See ACCOUNTING POLICIES – "Application of Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates – Utility Regulation" herein and Note 32 to the financial statements under "Retail Regulatory Matters""Alabama Power" for additional information about regulatory matters.
The results of operations for the past three years are not necessarily indicative of future earnings potential. The level of the Company'sAlabama Power's future earnings depends on numerous factors that affect the opportunities, challenges, and risks of the Company'sAlabama Power's primary business of providing electric service. These factors include the Company'sAlabama Power's ability to maintain a constructive regulatory environment that continues to allow for the timely recovery of prudently-incurred costs during a time of increasing costs and limited projected demandthe weak pace of growth over the next several years. Future earnings will be impacted byin new customers and electricity use per customer, growth.especially in residential and commercial markets. Earnings will also depend upon maintaining and growing sales, considering, among other things, the adoption and/or penetration rates of increasingly energy-efficient technologies and increasing volumes of electronic commerce transactions, both of which could contribute to a net reduction in customer usage. Earnings are subject to a variety of other factors. These factors include weather, competition, new energy contracts with other utilities, energy conservation practiced by customers, the use of alternative energy sources by customers, the price of electricity, the price elasticity of demand, and the rate of economic growth or decline in the Company'sAlabama Power's service territory. Demand for electricity is primarily driven by the pace of economic growth that may be affected by changes in regional and global economic conditions, which may impact future earnings.
On December 22, 2017, Tax Reform Legislation was signed into law and became effective on January 1,

MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS (continued)
Alabama Power Company 2018 which, among other things, reduces the federal corporate income tax rate to 21% and changes rates of depreciation and the business interest deduction. See "Income Tax MattersFederal Tax Reform Legislation" and FINANCIAL CONDITION AND LIQUIDITY – "Credit Rating Risk" herein and Notes 3 and 5 to the financial statements under "Retail Regulatory Matters – Rate RSE" and "Current and Deferred Income Taxes," respectively, for additional information.Annual Report

Environmental Matters
The Company'sAlabama Power's operations are regulated by state and federal environmental agencies through a variety of laws and regulations governing air, water, land, and protection of other natural resources. The CompanyAlabama Power maintains a comprehensive environmental compliance strategyand GHG strategies to assess upcoming requirements and compliance costs associated with these environmental laws and regulations. The costs, including capital expenditures, and operations and maintenance costs, and costs reflected in ARO liabilities, required to comply with environmental laws and regulations and to achieve stated goals may impact future electric generating unit retirement and replacement decisions, results of operations, cash

MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS (continued)
Alabama Power Company 2017 Annual Report

flows, andand/or financial condition. ComplianceRelated costs may result from the installation of additional environmental controls, closure and monitoring of CCR facilities, unit retirements, and adding or changing fuel sources for certain existing units, as well as related upgrades to theAlabama Power's transmission system.and distribution systems. A major portion of these compliance costs areis expected to be recovered through existing ratemaking provisions. The ultimate impact of the environmental laws and regulations and the GHG goals discussed belowherein will depend on various factors, such as state adoption and implementation of requirements, the availability and cost of any deployed control technology, fuel prices, and the outcome of pending and/or future legal challenges.
New or revised environmental laws and regulations could affect many areas of the Company'sAlabama Power's operations. The impact of any such changes cannot be determined at this time. Environmental compliance costs could affect earnings if such costs cannot continue to be fully recovered in rates on a timely basis. Environmental compliance costs are recovered through Rate CNP Compliance. See Note 32 to the financial statements under "Retail Regulatory Matters"Alabama Power – Rate CNP Compliance" for additional information. Further, increased costs that are recovered through regulated rates could contribute to reduced demand for electricity, which could negatively affect results of operations, cash flows, andand/or financial condition. Additionally, many commercial and industrial customers may also be affected by existing and future environmental requirements, which for some may have the potential to ultimately affect their demand for electricity.
Through 2017, the Company2018, Alabama Power has invested approximately $4.7$5.4 billion in environmental capital retrofit projects to comply with environmental requirements, with annual totals of approximately $681 million, $491 million, and $260 million for 2018, 2017, and $349 million for 2017, 2016, and 2015, respectively. Although the timing, requirements, and estimated costs could change as environmental laws and regulations are adopted or modified, as compliance plans are revised or updated, and as legal challenges to rules are initiated or completed, the Company'sAlabama Power's current compliance strategy estimates capital expenditures of $1.4 billion$635 million from 20182019 through 2022,2023, with annual totals of approximately $581 million in 2018, $110$226 million in 2019, $163$68 million in 2020, $258$118 million in 2021, and $268$112 million in 2022.2022, and $111 million in 2023. These estimates do not include any potential compliance costs associated with thepending regulation of CO2 emissions from fossil fuel-fired electric generating units. See "Global Climate Issues" herein for additional information. The CompanyAlabama Power also anticipates substantial expenditures associated with ash pond closure and ground water monitoring under the Disposal of Coal Combustion Residuals from Electric Utilities rule (CCR Rule),CCR Rule, which are reflected in the Company'sAlabama Power's ARO liabilities. See FINANCIAL CONDITION AND LIQUIDITY – "Capital Requirements and Contractual Obligations" herein and Note 16 to the financial statements under "Asset Retirement Obligations and Other Costs of Removal" for additional information.
Environmental Laws and Regulations
Air Quality
The EPA has set National Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS) for six air pollutants (carbon monoxide, lead, nitrogen dioxide, ozone, particulate matter, and SO2), to protect and improve the nation's air quality, which it reviews and revises periodically. RevisionsFollowing a NAAQS revision, states are required to these standardsdevelop an EPA-approved plan to protect air quality. These state plans can require additional emission controls, improvements in control efficiency, or fuel changes which can result in increased compliance and operational costs. NAAQS requirements can also adversely affect the siting of new electric generating facilities. In 2015, the EPA published a more stringent eight-hour ozone NAAQS. The EPA plans to complete designations for this rule by no later than April 30, 2018. No areas within the Company'sAlabama Power's service territory have been or are anticipated to becurrently designated nonattainment under the 2015 ozonefor any NAAQS. In 2010, the EPA revised the NAAQS for SO2, establishing a new one-hour standard, and is completing designations in multiple phases. The EPA has issued several rounds of area designations and no areas in the vicinity of Company-owned SO2 sources have been designated nonattainment under the 2010 one-hour SO2 NAAQS. However, final eight-hour ozone and SO2 one-hour designations for certain areas are still pending and, if otherIf areas are designated as nonattainment in the future, increased compliance costs could result.
In 2011, the EPA finalized the Cross-State Air Pollution Rule (CSAPR) and its NOX annual, NOX seasonal, and SO2 annual programs. CSAPR is an emissions trading program that addresses theto address impacts of the interstate transport of SO2 and NOX emissions from fossil fuel-fired power plants locatedelectric generating plants. CSAPR establishes emissions trading programs and budgets for certain states and allocates emissions allowances for sources in upwind states in the eastern half of the U.S. on air quality in downwindthose states. The Company has fossil fuel-fired generation subject to these requirements. In October 2016, the EPA published a final rule that revised the CSAPR seasonal NOX program, establishing more stringent ozone season NOX emissions budgets in Alabama. Increases in either future fossil fuel-fired generation or the availability or cost of CSAPR allowances could have a negative financial impact on results of operations for the Company.Alabama Power.
The EPA finalized regional haze regulations in 2005 and 2017. These regulations require states, tribal governments, and various federal agencies to develop and implement plans to reduce pollutants that impair visibility and demonstrate reasonable progress toward the goal of restoring natural visibility conditions in certain areas, including national parks and wilderness areas. States must submit a revised state implementation plan (SIP) to the EPA by July 31, 2021, demonstrating continued reasonable progress towards achieving visibility improvement goals. The EPA approved the regional progress SIP for the State implementation of reasonable progress could require further reductions in SO2 or NOX emissions, which could result in increased compliance costs.Alabama.
    Table of Contents                                Index to Financial Statements

MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS (continued)
Alabama Power Company 20172018 Annual Report

In 2015, the EPA published a final rule requiring certain states (including Alabama) to revise or remove the provisions of their SIPs regulating excess emissions at industrial facilities, including electric generating facilities, during periods of startup, shut-down, or malfunction (SSM). The state excess emission rules provide necessary operational flexibility to affected units during periods of SSM and, if removed, could affect unit availability and result in increased operations and maintenance costs for the Company.
Water Quality
In 2014, the EPA finalized requirements under Section 316(b) of the Clean Water Act (CWA) to regulate cooling water intake structures at existing power plants and manufacturing facilities in order(CWIS) to minimize their effects on fish and other aquatic life.life at existing power plants (e.g. coal, natural gas, oil, and nuclear generating plants) and manufacturing facilities. The regulation requires plant-specific studies to determine applicable measuresCWIS changes to protect organisms that either get caught on the intake screens (impingement) or are drawn into the cooling system (entrainment). TheAlabama Power is conducting these studies and currently anticipates applicable CWIS changes may include fish-friendly CWIS screens with fish return systems and minor additions of monitoring equipment at certain plants. However, the ultimate impact of this rule will depend on the outcome of these plant-specific studies, and any additional protective measures required to be incorporated into each plant's National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit based on site-specific factors.factors, and the outcome of any legal challenges.
In 2015, the EPA finalized the steam electric effluent limitations guidelines (ELG) rule (2015 ELG Rule) that set national standards for wastewater discharges from new and existing steam electric generating units.units generating greater than 50 MWs. The rule2015 ELG Rule prohibits effluent discharges of certain wastestreamswaste streams and imposes stringent arsenic, mercury, selenium, and nitrate/nitrite limits on scrubberflue gas desulfurization (scrubber) wastewater discharges. The revised technology-based limits and compliance dates maythe CCR Rule require extensive modificationschanges to existing ash and wastewater management systems or the installation and operation of new ash and wastewater management systems. Compliance with the 2015 ELG ruleRule is expected to require capital expenditures and increased operational costs primarily affecting the Company'sfor Alabama Power's coal-fired electric generation. Compliance applicability dates range from November 1, 2018 to December 31, 2023 with stateState environmental agencies incorporatingwill incorporate specific compliance applicability dates in the NPDES permitting process based on information provided for each ELG waste stream.stream no later than December 31, 2023. The EPA has committedis scheduled to issue a new rulemaking by December 2019 that could potentially revise the limitations and applicability dates of the ELG rule. The EPA expects to finalize this rulemaking in 2020. The Company continues to monitor the ELG rule and anticipates that approximately 1,000 MWstwo of the Company's generation will not be available afterwaste streams regulated in the compliance date.2015 ELG Rule. The ultimate impact of this ruleany changes to the 2015 ELG Rule will depend on the content of the new rule and the outcome of any new rule-making that revises the limitation and applicable dates. The Companylegal challenges. Alabama Power does not anticipate that the unavailability of any units as a result of the ELG rule will have a material impact on the Company'sAlabama Power's operations or financial condition.
In 2015, the EPA and the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (Corps) jointly published a final rule that revised the regulatory definition of waters of the United States (WOTUS) for all CWA programs. The rule significantly expanded the scope of federal jurisdiction over waterbodies (such as rivers, streams, canals, and canals)wastewater treatment ponds), which could impact new generation projects and permitting and reporting requirements associated with the installation, expansion, and maintenance of transmission and distribution projects. On July 27, 2017, theThe EPA and the Corps proposedare expected to rescindpublish a final rule in 2019 to replace the 2015 WOTUS rule.definition. The WOTUS rule has been stayed by the U.S. Courtimpact of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit since late 2015, but on January 22, 2018, the U.S. Supreme Court determined that federal district courts have jurisdiction over the pending challengesany changes to the rule. On February 6, 2018, the EPA and the Corps published a final rule delaying implementation of the 2015 WOTUS rule to 2020.will depend on the content of this final rule and the outcome of any legal challenges.
Coal Combustion Residuals
In 2015, the EPA finalized non-hazardous solid waste regulations for the disposal of CCR, including coal ash and gypsum, in landfills and surface impoundments (CCR units)(ash ponds) at active generating power plants. In addition to the EPA's CCR Rule, the State of Alabama has also finalized regulations regarding the handling of CCR that have been provided to the EPA for review. This state CCR rule is generally consistent with the federal CCR Rule. The EPA's CCR Rule requires CCR unitslandfills and ash ponds to be evaluated against a set of performance criteria and potentially closed if minimum criteria are not met. Closure of existing CCR unitslandfills and ash ponds could require installation of equipment and infrastructure to manage CCR in accordance with the rule. The EPA has announced plans to reconsider certain portions of the CCR Rule by no later than December 2019, which could result in changes to deadlines and corrective action requirements.
The EPA's reconsideration of the CCR Rule is due in part to a legislative development that impacts the potential oversight role of state agencies. Under the Water Infrastructure Improvements for the Nation Act, which became law in 2016, states are allowed to establish permit programs for implementing the CCR Rule.
Based on cost estimates for closure in place and monitoring of ash ponds pursuant to the CCR Rule, the CompanyAlabama Power recorded AROs for each CCR unit in 2015. As further analysis iswas performed and closure details arewere developed, the Company will continueAlabama Power has continued to periodically update these cost estimates, as necessary. See FINANCIAL CONDITION AND LIQUIDITY – "Capital Requirements and Contractual Obligations" herein and Note 1discussed further below.
The EPA published certain amendments to the financial statements under "Asset Retirement ObligationsCCR Rule, which became effective August 29, 2018. These amendments extend the date from April 2019 to October 31, 2020 to cease sending CCR and Other Costsother waste streams to ash ponds that demonstrate compliance with all except two of Removal"the specified performance criteria.
On August 21, 2018, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit issued a decision suggesting the EPA should regulate previously-excluded inactive ash ponds located at retired generation facilities and questioning both the ability of unlined ash ponds to continue operating no matter the performance criteria results and the classification of clay-lined landfills and ash ponds. These developments could impact the expected timing of Alabama Power's landfill and ash pond closure activities, but the extent of any impact will depend on the outcome of ongoing litigation, anticipated EPA rulemaking action to establish further guidance, and the outcome of any legal challenges.
In June 2018, Alabama Power recorded an increase of approximately $1.2 billion to its AROs related to the CCR Rule. The revised cost estimates were based on information from feasibility studies performed on ash ponds in use at plants operated by Alabama Power. During the second quarter 2018, Alabama Power's management completed its analysis of these studies which indicated that additional information regarding the Company's AROs as of December 31, 2017.closure costs, primarily related to increases in estimated ash volume, water management requirements,
    Table of Contents                                Index to Financial Statements

MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS (continued)
Alabama Power Company 20172018 Annual Report

and design revisions, will be required to close these ash ponds under the planned closure-in-place methodology. As the level of work becomes more defined in the next 12 months, it is likely that these cost estimates will change and the change could be material.
Alabama Power expects to periodically update its ARO cost estimates. Absent continued recovery of ARO costs through regulated rates, Alabama Power's results of operations, cash flows, and financial condition could be materially impacted. See FINANCIAL CONDITION AND LIQUIDITY – "Capital Requirements and Contractual Obligations" herein and Note 6 to the financial statements for additional information.
The ultimate outcome of these matters cannot be determined at this time.
Nuclear Decommissioning
In June 2018, Alabama Power completed an updated decommissioning cost site study for Plant Farley. The estimated cost of decommissioning based on the study resulted in an increase in Alabama Power's ARO liability of approximately $300 million. Amounts previously contributed to Alabama Power's external trust funds are currently projected to be adequate to meet the updated decommissioning obligations. See Note 6 to the financial statements for additional information.
Global Climate Issues
In 2015,On August 31, 2018, the EPA published final rules limitinga proposed rule known as the Affordable Clean Energy (ACE) Rule, which is intended to replace a regulation enacted in 2015 known as the Clean Power Plan (CPP), that would limit CO2 emissions from new, modified, and reconstructedexisting fossil fuel-fired electric generating units and guidelines for states to develop plans to meet EPA-mandated CO2 emission performance standards for existing units (known as the Clean Power Plan or CPP). In February 2016,units. The CPP has been stayed by the U.S. Supreme Court granted a staysince 2016. The ACE Rule would require states to develop GHG unit-specific emission rate standards based on heat-rate efficiency improvements for existing fossil fuel-fired steam units. As proposed, combustion turbines, including natural gas combined cycles, are not affected sources. As of January 1, 2019, Alabama Power has ownership interests in 20 fossil fuel-fired steam units to which the CPP, whichproposed ACE Rule is applicable. The ultimate impact of this rule to Alabama Power is currently unknown and will remain in effect throughdepend on changes between the resolution of litigation inproposal and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia challenging the legality of the CPPfinal rule, subsequent state plan developments and requirements, and any review by the U.S. Supreme Court. associated legal challenges.
On March 28, 2017, the U.S. President signed an executive order directing agencies to review actions that potentially burden the development or use of domestically produced energy resources, including review of the CPP and other CO2 emissions rules. On October 10, 2017,December 20, 2018, the EPA published a proposed review of the Standards of Performance for Greenhouse Gas Emissions from New, Modified, and Reconstructed Stationary Sources: Electric Utility Generating Units final rule to repeal(2015 NSPS rule). The EPA's final 2015 NSPS rule set standards of performance for new, modified, and reconstructed electric utility generating units which included stationary combustion turbines and fossil-fired steam boilers. This proposal reduces the CPPstringency of the 2015 NSPS rule by not basing the new and reconstructed fossil-fired steam boiler and IGCC standards on December 28, 2017, published an advanced notice of proposed rulemaking regarding a CPP replacement rule.
In 2015, parties to the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change, including the United States, adopted the Paris Agreement, which established a non-binding universal framework for addressing greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions based on nationally determined contributions. On June 1, 2017, the U.S. President announced that the United States would withdraw from the Paris Agreementpartial carbon capture and begin renegotiating its terms.sequestration. The ultimate impact of any changes to this agreement orrule will depend on the content of the final rule and the outcome of any renegotiated agreement depends on its implementation by participating countries.legal challenges.
The EPA's GHG reporting rule requires annual reporting of GHG emissions expressed in terms of metric tons of CO2 equivalent emissions for a company's operational control of facilities. Based on ownership or financial control of facilities, the Company's 2016Alabama Power's 2017 GHG emissions were approximately 3837 million metric tons of CO2 equivalent. The preliminary estimate of the Company's 2017Alabama Power's 2018 GHG emissions on the same basis is approximately 3736 million metric tons of CO2 equivalent.
Through 2017, the Southern Company system has achieved an estimated GHG emission reduction of 36% since 2007. In April 2018, Southern Company established an intermediate goal of a 50% reduction in carbon emissions from 2007 levels by 2030 and a long-term goal of low- to no-carbon operations by 2050. To achieve these goals, the Southern Company system expects to continue growing its renewable energy portfolio, optimize technology advancements to modernize its transmission and distribution systems, increase the use of natural gas for generation, complete ongoing construction projects, invest in energy efficiency, and continue research and development efforts focused on technologies to lower GHG emissions. The Southern Company system's ability to achieve these goals also will be dependent on many external factors, including supportive national energy policies, low natural gas prices, and the development, deployment, and advancement of relevant energy technologies.
FERC Matters
The Company has authority fromOpen Access Transmission Tariff
On May 10, 2018, AMEA and Cooperative Energy filed with the FERC to sell electricity at market-based rates. Since 2008, that authority, for certain balancing authority areas, has been conditioned on compliance with the requirements of an energy auction, which the FERC found to be tailored mitigation that addresses potential market power concerns. In accordance with FERC regulations governing such authority,a complaint against SCS and the traditional electric operating companies (including Alabama Power) claiming that the Company) and Southern Power filed a triennial market power analysiscurrent 11.25% base ROE used in 2014, which included continued reliance oncalculating the energy auction as tailored mitigation. In 2015, the FERC issued an order finding thatannual transmission revenue requirements of the traditional electric operating companies' (including the Company's)Alabama Power's) open access transmission tariff is unjust and Southern Power's existing tailored mitigation may not effectively mitigate the potential to exert market power in certain areas servedunreasonable as measured by the traditional electric operating companiesapplicable FERC standards. The complaint requested that the base ROE be set no higher than 8.65% and in some adjacent areas. The FERC directed the traditional electric operating companies (including the Company) and Southern Power to show why market-based rate authority should not be revoked in these areas or to provide a mitigation plan to further address market power concerns. The traditional electric operating companies (including the Company) and Southern Power filed a request for rehearing and filed their response withthat the FERC in 2015.
In December 2016, the traditional electric operating companies (including the Company) and Southern Power filed an amendment to their market-based rate tariff that proposed certain changes to the energy auction, as well as several non-tariff changes. On February 2, 2017, the FERC issued an order accepting all such changes subject to an additional condition of cost-based price caps for certain sales outside of the energy auction, finding that all of these changes would provide adequate alternative mitigationrefunds for the traditional electric operating companies' (includingdifference in revenue requirements that results from applying a just and reasonable ROE established in this proceeding upon determining the Company's)current ROE is unjust and Southern Power's potential to exert market power in certain areas served by the traditional electric operating companies (including the Company) and in some adjacent areas. On May 17, 2017, the FERC accepted the traditional electric operating companies' (including the Company's) and Southern Power's compliance filing accepting the terms of the order. While the FERC's February 2, 2017 order references the market power proceeding discussed above, it remains a separate, ongoing matter.
On October 25, 2017, the FERC issued an order in response to the traditional electric operating companies' (including the Company's) and Southern Power's June 29, 2017 triennial updated market power analysis. The FERC directed the traditional electric operating companies (including the Company) and Southern Power to show cause within 60 days why market-based rate authority should not be revoked in certain areas adjacent to the area presently under mitigation in accordance with the February 2, 2017 order or to provide a mitigation plan to further address market power concerns. On November 10, 2017, the traditional electric operating companies (including the Company) and Southern Power responded to the FERC and proposed to resolve matters by applying the alternative mitigation authorized by the February 2, 2017 order to the adjacent areas made the subject of the October 25, 2017 order.
The ultimate outcome of these matters cannot be determined at this time.
    Table of Contents                                Index to Financial Statements

MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS (continued)
Alabama Power Company 20172018 Annual Report

unreasonable. On June 18, 2018, SCS and the traditional electric operating companies (including Alabama Power) filed their response challenging the adequacy of the showing presented by the complainants and offering support for the current ROE. On September 6, 2018, the FERC issued an order establishing a refund effective date of May 10, 2018 in the event a refund is due and initiating an investigation and settlement procedures regarding the current base ROE. Through December 31, 2018, the estimated maximum potential refund is not expected to be material to Alabama Power's results of operations or cash flows. The ultimate outcome of this matter cannot be determined at this time.
Retail Regulatory Matters
The Company'sAlabama Power's revenues from regulated retail operations are collected through various rate mechanisms subject to the oversight of the Alabama PSC. The CompanyAlabama Power currently recovers its costs from the regulated retail business primarily through Rate RSE, Rate CNP, Rate ECR, and Rate NDR. In addition, the Alabama PSC issues accounting orders to address current events impacting the Company.Alabama Power. See Note 1 to the financial statements and Note 32 to the financial statements under "Retail Regulatory Matters""Alabama Power" for additional information regarding the Company'sAlabama Power's rate mechanisms and accounting orders.
Rate RSE
The Alabama PSC has adopted Rate RSE that provides for periodic annual adjustments based upon the Company'sAlabama Power's projected weighted cost ofcommon equity (WCE)return (WCER) compared to an allowable range. Rate RSE adjustments are based on forward-looking information for the applicable upcoming calendar year. Rate RSE adjustments for any two-year period, when averaged together, cannot exceed 4.0% and any annual adjustment is limited to 5.0%. When the projected WCER is under the allowed range, there is an adjusting point of 5.98% and eligibility for a performance-based adder of seven basis points, or 0.07%, to the WCER adjusting point if Alabama Power (i) has an "A" credit rating equivalent with at least one of the recognized rating agencies or (ii) is in the top one-third of a designated customer value benchmark survey. If the Company'sAlabama Power's actual retail return is above the allowed WCEWCER range, the excess will be refunded to customers unless otherwise directed by the Alabama PSC; however, there is no provision for additional customer billings should the actual retail return fall below the WCEWCER range. Prior to January 2019, retail rates remained unchanged when the WCER range was between 5.75% and 6.21%.
On May 1, 2018, the Alabama PSC approved modifications to Rate RSE and other commitments designed to position Alabama Power to address the growing pressure on its credit quality resulting from the Tax Reform Legislation, without increasing retail rates under Rate RSE in the near term. Alabama Power plans to reduce growth in total debt by increasing equity, with corresponding reductions in debt issuances, thereby de-leveraging its capital structure. Alabama Power's goal is to achieve an equity ratio of approximately 55% by the end of 2025. At December 31, 2016,2018, Alabama Power's equity ratio was approximately 47%.
The approved modifications to Rate RSE began for billings in January 2019. The modifications include reducing the Company's retail return exceededtop of the allowed WCEWCER range which resultedfrom 6.21% to 6.15% and modifications to the refund mechanism applicable to prior year actual results. The modifications to the refund mechanism allow Alabama Power to retain a portion of the revenue that causes the actual WCER for a given year to exceed the allowed range.
Generally, if Alabama Power's actual WCER is between 6.15% and 7.65%, customers will receive 25% of the amount between 6.15% and 6.65%, 40% of the amount between 6.65% and 7.15%, and 75% of the amount between 7.15% and 7.65%. Customers will receive all amounts in the Company establishing a $73 millionexcess of an actual WCER of 7.65%.
In conjunction with these modifications to Rate RSE, refund liability. In accordance with anon May 8, 2018, Alabama PSC order issuedPower consented to a moratorium on February 14, 2017, the Company applied the full amount of the refund to reduce theany upward adjustments under recovered balance of Rate CNP PPA as discussed further below.
Effective in January 2017, Rate RSE increased 4.48%, or $245for 2019 and 2020 and will also return $50 million annually. At December 31, 2017, the Company's actual retail return was within the allowed WCE range. to customers through bill credits in 2019.
On December 1, 2017, the CompanyNovember 30, 2018, Alabama Power made its required annual Rate RSE submission to the Alabama PSC of projected data for calendar year 2018.2019. Projected earnings were within the specified range; therefore, retail rates under Rate RSE remainedremain unchanged for 2018.2019.
In conjunction withAt December 31, 2018, Alabama Power's retail return exceeded the allowed WCER range, which resulted in Alabama Power establishing a regulatory liability of $109 million for Rate RSE refunds. In accordance with an Alabama PSC order issued on February 5, 2019, Alabama Power will apply $75 million to reduce the Company has an established retail tariff that provides for an adjustmentRate ECR under recovered balance and the remaining $34 million will be refunded to customer billings to recognize the impact of a changecustomers through bill credits in the statutory income tax rate. As a result of Tax Reform Legislation, the application of this tariff would reduce annual retail revenue by approximately $250 million over the remainder of 2018. The ultimate outcome of this matter cannot be determined at this time.July through September 2019.
Rate CNP PPA
The Company'sAlabama Power's retail rates, approved by the Alabama PSC, provide for adjustments under Rate CNP to recognize the placing of new generating facilities into retail service. The CompanyAlabama Power may also recover retail costs associated with certificated PPAs under

MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS (continued)
Alabama Power Company 2018 Annual Report

Rate CNP PPA. On March 7, 2017, the Alabama PSC issued a consent order that the Company leave in effect the current Rate CNP PPA factor for billings for the period April 1, 2017 through March 31, 2018. No adjustmentadjustments to Rate CNP PPA occurred during the period 2016 through 2018 and no adjustment is expected in 2018.2019.
In accordance with an accounting order issued onin February 17, 2017 by the Alabama PSC, Alabama Power reclassified $69 million of the Company eliminated the under recovered balance in Rate CNP PPA at December 31, 2016 which totaled approximately $142 million. As discussed herein under "Rate RSE," the Company utilized the full amount of its $73 million Rate RSE refund liability to reduce the amount of the Rate CNP PPA under recovery and reclassified the remaining $69 millionrecovered balance to a separate regulatory asset. The amortization of the new regulatory asset through Rate RSE will begin concurrently with the effective date of the Company'sAlabama Power's next depreciation study, which is expected to occur within the next two to four years. The Company's current depreciation study became effective January 1, 2017.no later than 2022.
Rate CNP Compliance
Rate CNP Compliance allows for the recovery of the Company'sAlabama Power's retail costs associated with laws, regulations, and other such mandates directed at the utility industry involving the environment, security, reliability, safety, sustainability, or similar considerations impacting the Company'sAlabama Power's facilities or operations. Rate CNP Compliance is based on forward-looking information and provides for the recovery of these costs pursuant to a factor that is calculated annually. Compliance costs to be recovered include operations and maintenance expenses, depreciation, and a return on certain invested capital. Revenues for Rate CNP Compliance, as recorded on the financial statements, are adjusted for differences in actual recoverable costs and amounts billed in current regulated rates. Accordingly, changes in the billing factor will have no significant effect on the Company'sAlabama Power's revenues or net income, but will affect annual cash flow. Changes in Rate CNP Compliance-related operations and maintenance expenses and depreciation generally will have no effect on net income.
In accordance with an accounting order issued onin February 17, 2017 by the Alabama PSC, the CompanyAlabama Power reclassified $36 million of its under recovered balance in Rate CNP Compliance to a separate regulatory asset. The amortization of the new regulatory

MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS (continued)
Alabama Power Company 2017 Annual Report

asset through Rate RSE will begin concurrently with the effective date of the Company'sAlabama Power's next depreciation study, which is expected to occur within the next two to four years. The Company's current depreciation study became effective January 1, 2017.no later than 2022.
On December 5, 2017, theNovember 30, 2018, Alabama PSC issued a consent order that the Company leave in effect for 2018 the factorsPower submitted calculations associated with the Company'sits cost of complying with environmental mandates, as provided under Rate CNP Compliance. The filing reflected a projected unrecovered retail revenue requirement for environmental compliance costs for the year 2017, with any under-collected amount for prior years deemedof approximately $205 million, which is being recovered before any current year amounts. Any under recovered amounts associated with 2018 will be reflected in the billing months of January 2019 filing.through December 2019.
Rate ECR
The CompanyAlabama Power has established energy cost recovery rates under the Company'sAlabama Power's Rate ECR as approved by the Alabama PSC. Rates are based on an estimate of future energy costs and the current over or under recovered balance. Revenues recognized under Rate ECR and recorded on the financial statements are adjusted for the difference in actual recoverable fuel costs and amounts billed in current regulated rates. The difference in the recoverable fuel costs and amounts billed give rise to the over or under recovered amounts recorded as regulatory assets or liabilities. The Company,Alabama Power, along with the Alabama PSC, continually monitors the over or under recovered cost balance to determine whether an adjustment to billing rates is required. Changes in the Rate ECR factor have no significant effect on the Company'sAlabama Power's net income, but will impact operating cash flows. Currently, the Alabama PSC may approve billing rates under Rate ECR of up to 5.910 cents per KWH.
In accordance with an accounting order issued onin February 17, 2017 by the Alabama PSC, the CompanyAlabama Power reclassified $36 million of its under recovered balance in Rate ECR to a separate regulatory asset. The amortization of the new regulatory asset through Rate RSE will begin concurrently with the effective date of the Company'sAlabama Power's next depreciation study, which is expected to occur within the next two to four years. The Company'sno later than 2022. Alabama Power's current depreciation study became effective January 1, 2017.
On May 1, 2018, the Alabama PSC approved an increase to Rate ECR from 2.015 cents per KWH to 2.353 cents per KWH effective July 2018 through December 5, 2017,2018. On December 4, 2018, the Alabama PSC issued a consent order that the Companyto leave this rate in effect for 2018 the energy cost recovery rates which beganthrough December 31, 2019. This change is expected to increase collections by approximately $183 million in 2017. Therefore, the Rate ECR factor as of January 1, 2018 remained at 2.015 cents per KWH. The rate will return to 5.910 cents per KWH in 2019, absent a2019. Absent any further order from the Alabama PSC.PSC, in January 2020, the rates will return to the originally authorized 5.910 cents per KWH.
As discussed herein under "Rate RSE," in accordance with an Alabama PSC order issued on February 5, 2019, Alabama Power will utilize $75 million of the 2018 Rate RSE refund liability to reduce the Rate ECR under recovered balance.
Tax Reform Accounting Order
On May 1, 2018, the Alabama PSC approved an accounting order that authorized Alabama Power to defer the benefits of federal excess deferred income taxes associated with the Tax Reform Legislation for the year ended December 31, 2018 as a regulatory liability and to use up to $30 million of such deferrals to offset under recovered amounts under Rate ECR. The estimated deferrals for the year ended December 31, 2018 totaled approximately $63 million, subject to adjustment following the filing of the 2018 tax return, of which $30 million was used to offset the Rate ECR under recovered balance and $33 million is recorded in other

MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS (continued)
Alabama Power Company 2018 Annual Report

regulatory liabilities, deferred on the balance sheet to be used for the benefit of customers as determined by the Alabama PSC at a future date. See Note 10 to the financial statements under "Current and Deferred Income Taxes" for additional information.
Software Accounting Order
On February 5, 2019, the Alabama PSC approved an accounting order that authorizes Alabama Power to establish a regulatory asset for operations and maintenance costs associated with software implementation projects. The regulatory asset will be amortized ratably over the life of the related software.
Plant Greene County
Alabama Power jointly owns Plant Greene County with an affiliate, Mississippi Power. See Note 5 to the financial statements under "Joint Ownership Agreements" for additional information regarding the joint ownership agreement. On August 6, 2018, Mississippi Power filed its proposed Reserve Margin Plan (RMP) with the Mississippi PSC, which proposes a four-year acceleration of the retirement of Plant Greene County Units 1 and 2 to the third quarter 2021 and the third quarter 2022, respectively. Mississippi Power's proposed Plant Greene County unit retirements would require the completion of proposed transmission and system reliability improvements, as well as agreement by Alabama Power. Alabama Power will continue to monitor the status of Mississippi Power's proposed RMP and associated regulatory process as well as the proposed transmission and system reliability improvements. Alabama Power will review all the facts and circumstances and will evaluate all its alternatives prior to reaching a final determination on the ongoing operations of Plant Greene County. The ultimate outcome of this matter cannot be determined at this time.
Request for Proposals for Future Generation
On September 21, 2018, Alabama Power issued a request for proposals of between 100 MWs and 1,200 MWs of capacity beginning no later than 2023. On November 9, 2018, bids were received and an evaluation of those bids is in progress. Any purchases will depend upon the cost competitiveness of the respective offers as well as other options available to Alabama Power. The ultimate outcome of this matter cannot be determined at this time.
Rate NDR
Based on an order from the Alabama PSC, the CompanyAlabama Power maintains a reserve for operations and maintenance expenses to cover the cost of damages from major storms to its transmission and distribution facilities. The order approves a separate monthly Rate NDR charge to customers consisting of two components. The first component is intended to establish and maintain a reserve balance for future storms and is an on-going part of customer billing. When the reserve balance falls below $50 million, a reserve establishment charge will be activated (and the on-going reserve maintenance charge concurrently suspended) until the reserve balance reaches $75 million. In December 2017, the reserve maintenance charge was suspended and the reserve establishment charge was activated as a result of the NDR balance falling below $50 million. Alabama Power expects to collect approximately $16 million annually until the reserve balance is restored to $75 million. The NDR balance at December 31, 2018 was $20 million and is included in other regulatory liabilities, deferred on the balance sheet.
The second component of the Rate NDR charge is intended to allow recovery of any existing deferred storm-related operations and maintenance costs and any future reserve deficits over a 24-month period.
In December 2017, the reserve maintenance charge was suspended and the reserve establishment charge was activated as The Alabama PSC order gives Alabama Power authority to record a result ofdeficit balance in the NDR balance falling below $50 million. The Company expectswhen costs of storm damage exceed any established reserve balance. Absent further Alabama PSC approval, the maximum total Rate NDR charge consisting of both components is $10 per month per non-residential customer account and $5 per month per residential customer account. Alabama Power has the authority, based on an order from the Alabama PSC, to collect approximately $16 million annually until the reserve balance is restored to $75 million. The NDR balance at December 31, 2017 was $38 million.accrue certain additional amounts as circumstances warrant.
As revenue from the Rate NDR charge is recognized, an equal amount of operations and maintenance expenses related to the NDR will also be recognized. As a result, the Rate NDR charge will not have an effect on net income but will impact operating cash flows.
Environmental Accounting Order
Based on an order from the Alabama PSC (Environmental Accounting Order), Alabama Power is allowed to establish a regulatory asset to record the unrecovered investment costs, including the unrecovered plant asset balance and the unrecovered costs associated with site removal and closure associated with future unit retirements caused by environmental regulations. The regulatory asset is being amortized and recovered over the affected unit's remaining useful life, as established prior to the decision regarding early retirement through Rate CNP Compliance. At December 31, 2018, this regulatory asset had a balance of $42 million. See "Environmental Matters – Environmental Laws and Regulations" herein for additional information regarding environmental regulations.

MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS (continued)
Alabama Power Company 2018 Annual Report

Subsequent to December 31, 2018, Alabama Power determined that Plant Gorgas Units 8, 9, and 10 (approximately 1,000 MWs) will be retired by April 15, 2019 due to the expected costs of compliance with federal and state environmental regulations. In accordance with the Environmental Accounting Order, approximately $740 million of net investment costs will be transferred to a regulatory asset at the retirement date and recovered over the affected units' remaining useful lives, as established prior to the decision to retire.
Income Tax Matters
Federal Tax Reform Legislation
In December 2017, the Tax Reform Legislation was signed into law and became effective on January 1, 2018. The Tax Reform Legislation, among other things, reduced the federal corporate income tax rate to 21%, retained normalization provisions for public utility property and existing renewable energy incentives, and repealed the corporate alternative minimum tax. In addition, under the Tax Reform Legislation, net operating losses (NOLs) generated after December 31, 2017 can no longer be carried back to previous tax years but can be carried forward indefinitely, with utilization limited to 80% of taxable income of the subsequent tax year. The projected reduction of Southern Company's consolidated income tax liability resulting from the tax rate reduction also delays the expected utilization of existing tax credit carryforwards. See Note 10 to the financial statements for information on Southern Company's joint consolidated income tax allocation agreement.
Following the enactment of the Tax Reform Legislation, the SEC staff issued Staff Accounting Bulletin 118 – "Income Tax Accounting Implications of the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act" (SAB 118), which provided for a measurement period of up to one year from the enactment date to complete accounting under GAAP for the tax effects of the legislation. Due to the complex and comprehensive nature of the enacted tax law changes and their application under GAAP, Alabama Power considered all amounts recorded in the financial statements as a result of the Tax Reform Legislation "provisional" as discussed in SAB 118 and subject to revision prior to filing its 2017 tax return in the fourth quarter 2018. Alabama Power recognized tax expense of $3 million in 2017 as a result of the Tax Reform Legislation. In addition, in total, Alabama Power recorded a $281 million decrease in regulatory assets and a $2.0 billion increase in regulatory liabilities as a result of the Tax Reform Legislation. As of December 31, 2018, Alabama Power considered the measurement of impacts from the Tax Reform Legislation on deferred income tax assets and liabilities, primarily due to the impact of the reduction of the corporate income tax rate, to be complete.
However, the IRS continues to issue regulations that provide further interpretation and guidance on the law and each state's adoption of the provisions contained in the Tax Reform Legislation remains uncertain. The regulatory treatment of certain impacts of the Tax Reform Legislation is subject to the discretion of the FERC. The ultimate impact of this matter cannot be determined at this time. See Note 2 to the financial statements under "Alabama Power – Rate RSE" for additional information regarding modifications to Rate RSE to reflect the impacts of the Tax Reform Legislation. Also see FINANCIAL CONDITION AND LIQUIDITY – "Credit Rating Risk" herein and Note 10 to the financial statements under "Current and Deferred Income Taxes" for additional information.
Bonus Depreciation
Under the Tax Reform Legislation, projects with binding contracts prior to September 28, 2017 and placed in service after September 27, 2017 remain eligible for bonus depreciation under the PATH Act. The PATH Act allowed for 50% bonus depreciation for 2015 through 2017, 40% bonus depreciation for 2018, and 30% bonus depreciation for 2019 and certain long-lived assets placed in service in 2020. Based on provisional estimates, bonus depreciation is expected to result in positive cash flows of approximately $100 million for the 2018 tax year and approximately $30 million for the 2019 tax year. See Note 10 to the financial statements under "Current and Deferred Income Taxes" for additional information. The ultimate outcome of this matter cannot be determined at this time.
Other Matters
Alabama Power is involved in various other matters being litigated and regulatory matters that could affect future earnings. In addition, Alabama Power is subject to certain claims and legal actions arising in the ordinary course of business. Alabama Power's business activities are subject to extensive governmental regulation related to public health and the environment, such as laws and regulations governing air, water, land, and protection of other natural resources. Litigation over environmental issues and claims of various types, including property damage, personal injury, common law nuisance, and citizen enforcement of environmental laws and regulations, has occurred throughout the U.S. This litigation has included claims for damages alleged to have been caused by CO2 and other emissions, CCR, and alleged exposure to hazardous materials, and/or requests for injunctive relief in connection with such matters.

MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS (continued)
Alabama Power Company 2018 Annual Report

The ultimate outcome of such pending or potential litigation or regulatory matters cannot be predicted at this time; however, for current proceedings not specifically reported herein or in Notes 2 and 3 to the financial statements, management does not anticipate that the ultimate liabilities, if any, arising from such current proceedings would have a material effect on Alabama Power's financial statements. See Notes 2 and 3 to the financial statements for a discussion of various other contingencies, regulatory matters, and other matters being litigated which may affect future earnings potential.
ACCOUNTING POLICIES
Application of Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates
Alabama Power prepares its financial statements in accordance with GAAP. Significant accounting policies are described in Notes 1, 5, and 6 to the financial statements. In the application of these policies, certain estimates are made that may have a material impact on Alabama Power's results of operations and related disclosures. Different assumptions and measurements could produce estimates that are significantly different from those recorded in the financial statements. Senior management has reviewed and discussed the following critical accounting policies and estimates with the Audit Committee of Southern Company's Board of Directors.
Utility Regulation
Alabama Power is subject to retail regulation by the Alabama PSC and wholesale regulation by the FERC. As a result, Alabama Power applies accounting standards which require the financial statements to reflect the effects of rate regulation. Through the ratemaking process, the regulators may require the inclusion of costs or revenues in periods different than when they would be recognized by a non-regulated company. This treatment may result in the deferral of expenses and the recording of related regulatory assets based on anticipated future recovery through rates or the deferral of gains or creation of liabilities and the recording of related regulatory liabilities. The application of the accounting standards has a further effect on Alabama Power's financial statements as a result of the estimates of allowable costs used in the ratemaking process. These estimates may differ from those actually incurred by Alabama Power; therefore, the accounting estimates inherent in specific costs such as depreciation, AROs, and pension and other postretirement benefits have less of a direct impact on Alabama Power's results of operations and financial condition than they would on a non-regulated company.
As reflected in Note 2 to the financial statements under "Alabama PowerRegulatory Assets and Liabilities," significant regulatory assets and liabilities have been recorded. Management reviews the ultimate recoverability of these regulatory assets and any requirement to refund these regulatory liabilities based on applicable regulatory guidelines and GAAP. However, adverse legislative, judicial, or regulatory actions could materially impact the amounts of such regulatory assets and liabilities and could adversely impact Alabama Power's financial statements.
Asset Retirement Obligations
AROs are computed as the fair value of the estimated costs for an asset's future retirement and are recorded in the period in which the liability is incurred. The estimated costs are capitalized as part of the related long-lived asset and depreciated over the asset's useful life. In the absence of quoted market prices, AROs are estimated using present value techniques in which estimates of future cash outlays associated with the asset retirements are discounted using a credit-adjusted risk-free rate. Estimates of the timing and amounts of future cash outlays are based on projections of when and how the assets will be retired and the cost of future removal activities.
The liability for AROs primarily relates to the decommissioning of Alabama Power's nuclear facility, Plant Farley, and facilities that are subject to the CCR Rule and the related state rule, principally ash ponds. In addition, Alabama Power has AROs related to various landfill sites, underground storage tanks, asbestos removal related to ongoing repair and maintenance, disposal of polychlorinated biphenyls in certain transformers, and disposal of sulfur hexafluoride gas in certain substation breakers.
Alabama Power also has identified retirement obligations related to certain transmission and distribution facilities, asbestos containing material within long-term assets not subject to ongoing repair and maintenance activities, and certain wireless communication towers. However, liabilities for the removal of these assets have not been recorded because the settlement timing for the retirement obligations related to these assets is indeterminable and, therefore, the fair value of the retirement obligations cannot be reasonably estimated. A liability for these retirement obligations will be recognized when sufficient information becomes available to support a reasonable estimation of the retirement obligation.
The cost estimates for AROs related to the disposal of CCR are based on information using various assumptions related to closure and post-closure costs, timing of future cash outlays, inflation and discount rates, and the potential methods for complying with the CCR Rule requirements for closure in place. In June 2018, Alabama Power recorded increases of approximately $1.2 billion

MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS (continued)
Alabama Power Company 2018 Annual Report

to its AROs related to the CCR Rule and approximately $300 million to its AROs related to updated nuclear decommissioning cost site studies. The revised CCR-related cost estimates as of June 30, 2018 were based on information from feasibility studies performed on ash ponds in use at the plants Alabama Power operates. During the second quarter 2018, Alabama Power's management completed its analysis of these studies which indicated that additional closure costs, primarily related to increases in estimated ash volume, water management requirements, and design revisions, will be required to close these ash ponds under the planned closure-in-place methodology. As the level of work becomes more defined in the next 12 months, it is likely that these cost estimates will change and the change could be material. Alabama Power expects to periodically update its ARO cost estimates. See FUTURE EARNINGS POTENTIAL – "Environmental Matters – Environmental Laws and Regulations – Coal Combustion Residuals" herein and Note 6 to the financial statements for additional information.
Given the significant judgment involved in estimating AROs, Alabama Power considers the liabilities for AROs to be critical accounting estimates.
Pension and Other Postretirement Benefits
Alabama Power's calculation of pension and other postretirement benefits expense is dependent on a number of assumptions. These assumptions include discount rates, healthcare cost trend rates, expected long-term return on plan assets, mortality rates, expected salary and wage increases, and other factors. Components of pension and other postretirement benefits expense include interest and service cost on the pension and other postretirement benefit plans, expected return on plan assets, and amortization of certain unrecognized costs and obligations. Actual results that differ from the assumptions utilized are accumulated and amortized over future periods and, therefore, generally affect recognized expense and the recorded obligation in future periods. While Alabama Power believes that the assumptions used are appropriate, differences in actual experience or significant changes in assumptions would affect its pension and other postretirement benefit costs and obligations.
Key elements in determining Alabama Power's pension and other postretirement benefit expense are the expected long-term return on plan assets and the discount rate used to measure the benefit plan obligations and the periodic benefit plan expense for future periods. The expected long-term return on pension and other postretirement benefit plan assets is based on Southern Company's investment strategy, historical experience, and expectations for long-term rates of return that consider external actuarial advice. Southern Company determines the long-term return on plan assets by applying the long-term rate of expected returns on various asset classes to Southern Company's target asset allocation. For purposes of determining Alabama Power's liability related to the pension and other postretirement benefit plans, Southern Company discounts the future related cash flows using a single-point discount rate developed from the weighted average of market-observed yields for high quality fixed income securities with maturities that correspond to expected benefit payments.
A 25 basis point change in any significant assumption (discount rate, salary increases, or long-term rate of return on plan assets) would result in a $9 million or less change in total annual benefit expense, a $99 million or less change in the projected obligation for the pension plan, and an $11 million or less change in the projected obligation for other post retirement benefit plans.
Alabama Power recorded pension costs of $27 million, $9 million, and $11 million in 2018, 2017, and 2016, respectively. Postretirement benefit costs for Alabama Power were $2 million, $3 million, and $4 million in 2018, 2017, and 2016, respectively. Such amounts are dependent on several factors including trust earnings and changes to the plans. A portion of pension and other postretirement benefit costs is capitalized based on construction-related labor charges. Pension and other postretirement benefit costs are a component of the regulated rates and generally do not have a long-term effect on net income.
See Note 11 to the financial statements for additional information regarding pension and other postretirement benefits.
Contingent Obligations
Alabama Power is subject to a number of federal and state laws and regulations, as well as other factors and conditions that subject it to environmental, litigation, and other risks. See FUTURE EARNINGS POTENTIAL herein and Notes 2 and 3 to the financial statements for more information regarding certain of these contingencies. Alabama Power periodically evaluates its exposure to such risks and records reserves for those matters where a non-tax-related loss is considered probable and reasonably estimable. The adequacy of reserves can be significantly affected by external events or conditions that can be unpredictable; thus, the ultimate outcome of such matters could materially affect Alabama Power's results of operations, cash flows, or financial condition.

MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS (continued)
Alabama Power Company 2018 Annual Report

Recently Issued Accounting Standards
See Note 1 to the financial statements under "Recently Adopted Accounting Standards" for additional information.
In 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-02, Leases (Topic 842) (ASU 2016-02). ASU 2016-02 requires lessees to recognize on the balance sheet a lease liability and a right-of-use asset for all leases. ASU 2016-02 also changes the recognition, measurement, and presentation of expense associated with leases and provides clarification regarding the identification of certain components of contracts that would represent a lease. The accounting required by lessors is relatively unchanged. ASU 2016-02 is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2018 and Alabama Power adopted the new standard effective January 1, 2019.
Alabama Power elected the transition methodology provided by ASU No. 2018-11, Leases (Topic 842): Targeted Improvements, whereby the requirements of ASU 2016-02 are applied on a prospective basis as of the adoption date of January 1, 2019, without restating prior periods. Alabama Power elected the package of practical expedients provided by ASU 2016-02 that allows prior determinations of whether existing contracts are, or contain, leases and the classification of existing leases to continue without reassessment. Additionally, Alabama Power applied the use-of-hindsight practical expedient in determining lease terms as of the date of adoption and elected the practical expedient that allows existing land easements not previously accounted for as leases not to be reassessed. Alabama Power also made accounting policy elections to account for short-term leases in all asset classes as off-balance sheet leases and combined lease and non-lease components in the computations of lease obligations and right-of-use assets for most asset classes.
Alabama Power completed the implementation of a new application to track and account for its leases and updated its internal controls and accounting policies to support the accounting for leases under ASU 2016-02. Alabama Power completed its lease inventory and determined its most significant leases involve PPAs. In the first quarter 2019, the adoption of ASU 2016-02 resulted in recording lease liabilities and right-of-use assets on Alabama Power's balance sheet each totaling approximately $195 million, with no impact on Alabama Power's statement of income.
FINANCIAL CONDITION AND LIQUIDITY
Overview
Alabama Power's financial condition remained stable at December 31, 2018. Alabama Power's cash requirements primarily consist of funding ongoing operations, common stock dividends, capital expenditures, and debt maturities. Capital expenditures and other investing activities include investments to meet projected long-term demand requirements, to maintain existing generation facilities, to comply with environmental regulations including adding environmental modifications to certain existing generating units and closures of ash ponds, to expand and improve transmission and distribution facilities, and for restoration following major storms. Operating cash flows provide a substantial portion of Alabama Power's cash needs. For the three-year period from 2019 through 2021, Alabama Power's projected common stock dividends, capital expenditures, and debt maturities are expected to exceed operating cash flows. Alabama Power plans to finance future cash needs in excess of its operating cash flows primarily through external securities issuances, borrowings from financial institutions, or equity contributions from Southern Company. Alabama Power plans to use commercial paper to manage seasonal variations in operating cash flows and for other working capital needs. Alabama Power intends to continue to monitor its access to short-term and long-term capital markets as well as its bank credit arrangements to meet future capital and liquidity needs. See "Sources of Capital," "Financing Activities," and "Capital Requirements and Contractual Obligations" herein for additional information.
Alabama Power's investments in the qualified pension plan and the nuclear decommissioning trust funds decreased in value as of December 31, 2018 as compared to December 31, 2017. No contributions to the qualified pension plan were made for the year ended December 31, 2018 and no mandatory contributions to the qualified pension plan are anticipated during 2019. Alabama Power's funding obligations for the nuclear decommissioning trust funds are based on the most recent site study completed in 2018, and the next study is expected to be conducted by 2023. See Notes 6 and 11 to the financial statements under "Nuclear Decommissioning" and "Pension Plans," respectively, for additional information.
Net cash provided from operating activities totaled $1.9 billion for 2018, an increase of $44 million as compared to 2017. The increase in cash provided from operating activities was primarily due to an increase in weather-related revenues, fuel cost recovery, and income tax refunds received in 2018, partially offset by materials and supplies purchases, the timing of vendor payments, and settlement of AROs. Net cash provided from operating activities totaled $1.8 billion for 2017, a decrease of $112 million as compared to 2017. The decrease in cash provided from operating activities was primarily due to the timing of income tax payments in 2017 and the receipt of income tax refunds in 2016 as a result of bonus depreciation, partially offset by the voluntary contribution to the qualified pension plan in 2016.

MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS (continued)
Alabama Power Company 2018 Annual Report

Net cash used for investing activities totaled $2.3 billion for 2018, $1.9 billion for 2017, and $1.4 billion for 2016. These activities were primarily related to gross property additions for environmental, distribution, transmission, and steam generation assets.
Net cash provided from financing activities totaled $177 million in 2018 primarily due to issuances of long-term debt and additional capital contributions from Southern Company, partially offset by the payment of common stock dividends and a maturity of long-term debt. Net cash provided from financing activities totaled $163 million in 2017 primarily due to issuances of long-term debt and additional capital contributions from Southern Company, partially offset by the payment of common stock dividends and maturities of long-term debt. Fluctuations in cash flow from financing activities vary from year to year based on capital needs and the maturity or redemption of securities.
Significant balance sheet changes for 2018 included increases of $2.84 billion in property, plant, and equipment primarily due to $1.35 billion in AROs and additions to nuclear, distribution, and transmission assets. Other changes include $522 million in capital contributions from Southern Company and $295 million in long-term debt primarily due to a senior notes issuance. See Notes 6 and 8 to the financial statements for additional information related to changes in Alabama Power's AROs and financing activities, respectively.
Alabama Power's ratio of common equity to total capitalization plus short-term debt was 47.0% and 46.3% at December 31, 2018 and 2017, respectively. See Note 8 to the financial statements for additional information.
Sources of Capital
Alabama Power plans to obtain the funds to meet its future capital needs from sources similar to those used in the past, which were primarily from operating cash flows, external security issuances, borrowings from financial institutions, and equity contributions from Southern Company. However, the amount, type, and timing of any future financings, if needed, will depend upon prevailing market conditions, regulatory approval, and other factors. Subsequent to December 31, 2018, Alabama Power received a capital contribution totaling $1.225 billion from Southern Company.
Security issuances are subject to regulatory approval by the Alabama PSC. Additionally, with respect to the public offering of securities, Alabama Power files registration statements with the SEC under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended. The amounts of securities authorized by the Alabama PSC are continuously monitored and appropriate filings are made to ensure flexibility in the capital markets.
Alabama Power obtains financing separately without credit support from any affiliate. See Note 8 to the financial statements under "Bank Credit Arrangements" for additional information. The Southern Company system does not maintain a centralized cash or money pool. Therefore, funds of Alabama Power are not commingled with funds of any other company in the Southern Company system.
At December 31, 2018, Alabama Power's current liabilities exceeded current assets by $50 million. Alabama Power's current liabilities sometimes exceed current assets because of long-term debt maturities and the periodic use of short-term debt as a funding source, as well as significant seasonal fluctuations in cash needs.
At December 31, 2018, Alabama Power had approximately $313 million of cash and cash equivalents. Committed credit arrangements with banks at December 31, 2018 were as follows:
Expires     Expires Within One Year
2019 2020 2022 Total Unused Term Out No Term Out
(in millions) (in millions) (in millions)
$33
 $500
 $800
 $1,333
 $1,333
 $
 $33
See Note 8 to the financial statements under "Bank Credit Arrangements" for additional information.
Most of these bank credit arrangements, as well as Alabama Power's term loan arrangements, contain covenants that limit debt levels and contain cross-acceleration provisions to other indebtedness (including guarantee obligations) of Alabama Power. Such cross-acceleration provisions to other indebtedness would trigger an event of default if Alabama Power defaulted on indebtedness, the payment of which was then accelerated. At December 31, 2018, Alabama Power was in compliance with all such covenants. None of the bank credit arrangements contain material adverse change clauses at the time of borrowings.
Subject to applicable market conditions, Alabama Power expects to renew or replace its bank credit arrangements as needed prior to expiration. In connection therewith, Alabama Power may extend the maturity dates and/or increase or decrease the lending commitments thereunder.

MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS (continued)
Alabama Power Company 2018 Annual Report

A portion of the unused credit with banks is allocated to provide liquidity support to Alabama Power's pollution control revenue bonds and commercial paper programs. The amount of variable rate pollution control revenue bonds outstanding requiring liquidity support was $854 million at December 31, 2018.
Alabama Power also has substantial cash flow from operating activities and access to the capital markets, including a commercial paper program, to meet liquidity needs. Alabama Power may meet short-term cash needs through its commercial paper program. Alabama Power may also meet short-term cash needs through a Southern Company subsidiary organized to issue and sell commercial paper at the request and for the benefit of Alabama Power and the other traditional electric operating companies. Proceeds from such issuances for the benefit of Alabama Power are loaned directly to Alabama Power. The obligations of each traditional electric operating company under these arrangements are several and there is no cross-affiliate credit support.
Details of short-term borrowings were as follows:
 Short-term Debt at the End of the Period 
Short-term Debt During the Period (*)
 Amount Outstanding Weighted Average Interest Rate Average
Amount Outstanding
 Weighted
Average
Interest
Rate
 Maximum
Amount
Outstanding
 (in millions)   (in millions)   (in millions)
December 31, 2018$
 % $27
 2.3% $258
December 31, 2017$3
 3.7% $25
 1.3% $223
December 31, 2016$
 % $16
 0.6% $200
(*)Average and maximum amounts are based upon daily balances during the 12-month periods ended December 31, 2018, 2017, and 2016.
Alabama Power believes that the need for working capital can be adequately met by utilizing commercial paper programs, lines of credit, and operating cash flows.
Financing Activities
In June 2018, Alabama Power issued $500 million aggregate principal amount of Series 2018A 4.300% Senior Notes due July 15, 2048. The proceeds were used to repay outstanding commercial paper and for general corporate purposes, including Alabama Power's continuous construction program.
In October 2018, Alabama Power purchased and held $120 million aggregate principal amount of The Industrial Development Board of the City of Mobile, Alabama Pollution Control Revenue Bonds (Alabama Power Company Plant Barry Project), Series 2008. Alabama Power reoffered these bonds to the public in November 2018.
In November 2018, Alabama Power guaranteed a $100 million three-year bank term loan for SEGCO. See Note 9 to the financial statements under "Guarantees" for additional information.
Subsequent to December 31, 2018, Alabama Power repaid at maturity $200 million aggregate principal amount of Series Z 5.125% Senior Notes due February 15, 2019.
In addition to any financings that may be necessary to meet capital requirements and contractual obligations, Alabama Power plans to continue, when economically feasible, a program to retire higher-cost securities and replace these obligations with lower-cost capital if market conditions permit.
Credit Rating Risk
At December 31, 2018, Alabama Power did not have any credit arrangements that would require material changes in payment schedules or terminations as a result of a credit rating downgrade.

MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS (continued)
Alabama Power Company 2018 Annual Report

There are certain contracts that could require collateral, but not accelerated payment, in the event of a credit rating change to BBB and/or Baa2 or below. These contracts are primarily for physical electricity purchases, fuel purchases, fuel transportation and storage, energy price risk management, and transmission.
The maximum potential collateral requirements under these contracts at December 31, 2018 were as follows:
Credit Ratings
Maximum Potential
Collateral
Requirements
 (in millions)
At BBB and/or Baa2$1
At BBB- and/or Baa3$1
Below BBB- and/or Baa3$356
Included in these amounts are certain agreements that could require collateral in the event that either Alabama Power or Georgia Power (an affiliate of Alabama Power) has a credit rating change to below investment grade. Generally, collateral may be provided by a Southern Company guaranty, letter of credit, or cash. Additionally, a credit rating downgrade could impact the ability of Alabama Power to access capital markets and would be likely to impact the cost at which it does so.
On September 28, 2018, Fitch assigned a negative rating outlook to the ratings of Southern Company and certain of its subsidiaries (including Alabama Power).
Also on September 28, 2018, Moody's revised its rating outlook for Alabama Power from negative to stable.
As a result of the Tax Reform Legislation, certain financial metrics, such as the funds from operations to debt percentage, used by the credit rating agencies to assess Southern Company and its subsidiaries, including Alabama Power, may be negatively impacted. The modifications to Rate RSE and other commitments approved by the Alabama PSC are expected to help mitigate these potential adverse impacts to certain credit metrics and will help Alabama Power meet its goal of achieving an equity ratio of approximately 55% by the end of 2025. See Note 2 to the financial statements under "Alabama Power – Rate RSE" for additional information.
Market Price Risk
Due to cost-based rate regulation and other various cost recovery mechanisms, Alabama Power continues to have limited exposure to market volatility in interest rates, commodity fuel prices, and prices of electricity. To manage the volatility attributable to these exposures, Alabama Power nets the exposures, where possible, to take advantage of natural offsets and enters into various derivative transactions for the remaining exposures pursuant to Alabama Power's policies in areas such as counterparty exposure and risk management practices. Alabama Power's policy is that derivatives are to be used primarily for hedging purposes and mandates strict adherence to all applicable risk management policies. Derivative positions are monitored using techniques including, but not limited to, market valuation, value at risk, stress testing, and sensitivity analysis.
To mitigate future exposure to changes in interest rates, Alabama Power may enter into derivatives designated as hedges. The weighted average interest rate on $1.1 billion of long-term variable interest rate exposure at December 31, 2018 was 2.5%. If Alabama Power sustained a 100 basis point change in interest rates for all long-term variable interest rate exposure, the change would affect annualized interest expense by approximately $11 million at December 31, 2018. See Note 1 to the financial statements under "Financial Instruments" and Note 14 to the financial statements for additional information.
To mitigate residual risks relative to movements in electricity prices, Alabama Power enters into physical fixed-price contracts for the purchase and sale of electricity through the wholesale electricity market and financial hedge contracts for natural gas purchases. Alabama Power continues to manage a retail fuel-hedging program implemented per the guidelines of the Alabama PSC. Alabama Power had no material change in market risk exposure for the year ended December 31, 2018 when compared to the year ended December 31, 2017.
In addition, Rate ECR allows the recovery of specific costs associated with the sales of natural gas that become necessary due to operating considerations at Alabama Power's electric generating facilities. Rate ECR also allows recovery of the cost of financial instruments used for hedging market price risk up to 75% of the budgeted annual amount of natural gas purchases. Alabama Power may not engage in natural gas hedging activities that extend beyond a rolling 42-month window. Also, the premiums paid for natural gas financial options may not exceed 5% of Alabama Power's natural gas budget for that year.

MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS (continued)
Alabama Power Company 2018 Annual Report

The changes in fair value of energy-related derivative contracts are substantially attributable to both the volume and the price of natural gas. For the years ended December 31, the changes in fair value of energy-related derivative contracts, the majority of which are composed of regulatory hedges, were as follows:
 
2018
Changes
 
2017
Changes
 Fair Value
 (in millions)
Contracts outstanding at the beginning of the period, assets (liabilities), net$(6) $12
Contracts realized or settled(2) (1)
Current period changes(*)
4
 (17)
Contracts outstanding at the end of the period, assets (liabilities), net$(4) $(6)
(*)Current period changes also include the changes in fair value of new contracts entered into during the period, if any.
The net hedge volumes of energy-related derivative contracts at December 31, 2018 and 2017 were as follows:
 2018 2017
 mmBtu Volume
 (in millions)
Commodity – Natural gas swaps65
 64
Commodity – Natural gas options9
 5
Total hedge volume74
 69
The weighted average swap contract cost above market prices was approximately $0.08 per mmBtu at December 31, 2018 and December 31, 2017. The change in option fair value is primarily attributable to the volatility of the market and the underlying change in the natural gas price. Substantially all of the natural gas hedge gains and losses are recovered through Alabama Power's retail energy cost recovery clause.
At December 31, 2018 and 2017, substantially all of Alabama Power's energy-related derivative contracts were designated as regulatory hedges and were related to Alabama Power's fuel-hedging program. Therefore, gains and losses are initially recorded as regulatory liabilities and assets, respectively, and then are included in fuel expense as they are recovered through the energy cost recovery clause. Certain other gains and losses on energy-related derivatives, designated as cash flow hedges, are initially deferred in OCI before being recognized in income in the same period as the hedged transaction. Gains and losses on energy-related derivative contracts that are not designated or fail to qualify as hedges are recognized in the statements of income as incurred and were not material for any year presented.
Alabama Power uses over-the-counter contracts that are not exchange traded but are fair valued using prices which are market observable, and thus fall into Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy. See Note 13 to the financial statements for further discussion of fair value measurements. The maturities of the energy-related derivative contracts, which are primarily Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy, at December 31, 2018 were as follows:
   Fair Value Measurements
   December 31, 2018
 Total Maturity
 Fair Value  Year 1  Years 2&3
 (in millions)
Level 1$
 $
 $
Level 2(4) (1) (3)
Level 3
 
 
Fair value of contracts outstanding at end of period$(4) $(1) $(3)
Alabama Power is exposed to market price risk in the event of nonperformance by counterparties to energy-related and interest rate derivative contracts. Alabama Power only enters into agreements and material transactions with counterparties that have

MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS (continued)
Alabama Power Company 2018 Annual Report

investment grade credit ratings by Moody's and S&P, or with counterparties who have posted collateral to cover potential credit exposure. Therefore, Alabama Power does not anticipate market risk exposure from nonperformance by the counterparties. For additional information, see Note 1 to the financial statements under "Financial Instruments" and Note 14 to the financial statements.
Capital Requirements and Contractual Obligations
The construction program of Alabama Power is currently estimated to total $1.8 billion for 2019, $1.6 billion for 2020, $1.6 billion for 2021, $1.4 billion for 2022, and $1.5 billion for 2023. The construction program includes capital expenditures related to contractual purchase commitments for nuclear fuel and capital expenditures covered under LTSAs. Estimated capital expenditures to comply with environmental laws and regulations included in these amounts are $226 million for 2019, $68 million for 2020, $118 million for 2021, $112 million for 2022, and $111 million for 2023. These estimated expenditures do not include any potential compliance costs associated with pending regulation of CO2 emissions from fossil-fuel-fired electric generating units. See FUTURE EARNINGS POTENTIAL – "Environmental Matters – Environmental Laws and Regulations" and "– Global Climate Issues" herein for additional information.
Alabama Power also anticipates costs associated with closure-in-place and monitoring of ash ponds in accordance with the CCR Rule, which are reflected in Alabama Power's ARO liabilities. These costs, which are expected to change and could change materially as underlying assumptions are refined and the cost, method, and timing of compliance activities continue to be evaluated, are currently estimated to be $232 million for 2019, $238 million for 2020, $246 million for 2021, $252 million for 2022, and $258 million for 2023. See FUTURE EARNINGS POTENTIAL – "Environmental Matters – Environmental Laws and Regulations – Coal Combustion Residuals" herein and Note 6 to the financial statements for additional information. Costs associated with the CCR Rule are expected to be recovered through Rate CNP Compliance.
The construction program is subject to periodic review and revision, and actual construction costs may vary from these estimates because of numerous factors. These factors include: changes in business conditions; changes in load projections; changes in environmental laws and regulations; the outcome of any legal challenges to environmental rules; changes in generating plants, including unit retirements and replacements and adding or changing fuel sources at existing generating units, to meet regulatory requirements; changes in the expected environmental compliance program; changes in FERC rules and regulations; Alabama PSC approvals; changes in legislation; the cost and efficiency of construction labor, equipment, and materials; project scope and design changes; storm impacts; and the cost of capital. In addition, there can be no assurance that costs related to capital expenditures will be fully recovered.
As a result of NRC requirements, Alabama Power has external trust funds for nuclear decommissioning costs; however, Alabama Power currently has no additional funding requirements. For additional information, see Note 6 to the financial statements under "Nuclear Decommissioning."
In addition, as discussed in Note 11 to the financial statements, Alabama Power provides postretirement benefits to substantially all employees and funds trusts to the extent required by the Alabama PSC and the FERC.
Funding requirements related to obligations associated with scheduled maturities of long-term debt, as well as the related interest, derivative obligations, pension and other postretirement benefit plans, preferred stock dividends, leases, other purchase commitments, and ARO settlements are detailed in the contractual obligations table that follows. See Notes 1, 6, 8, 9, 11, and 14 to the financial statements for additional information.

MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS (continued)
Alabama Power Company 2018 Annual Report

Contractual Obligations
Contractual obligations at December 31, 2018 were as follows:
 2019 2020- 2021 2022- 2023 After 2023 Total
 (in millions)
Long-term debt(a) —
         
Principal$200
 $560
 $1,050
 $6,377
 $8,187
Interest330
 630
 575
 4,751
 6,286
Preferred stock dividends(b)
15
 29
 29
 
 73
Financial derivative obligations(c)
4
 6
 
 
 10
Operating leases(d)
12
 17
 9
 1
 39
Capital lease1
 1
 1
 1
 4
Purchase commitments —         
Capital(e)
1,671
 3,049
 2,536
 
 7,256
Fuel(f)
1,072
 1,342
 531
 1,108
 4,053
Purchased power(g)
83
 178
 140
 512
 913
Other(h)
42
 61
 61
 277
 441
ARO settlements(i)
232
 485
 510
 
 1,227
Pension and other postretirement benefit plans(j)
16
 32
 
 
 48
Total$3,678
 $6,390
 $5,442
 $13,027
 $28,537
(a)All amounts are reflected based on final maturity dates. Alabama Power plans to continue, when economically feasible, to retire higher-cost securities and replace these obligations with lower-cost capital if market conditions permit. Variable rate interest obligations are estimated based on rates at December 31, 2018, as reflected in the statements of capitalization. Fixed rates include, where applicable, the effects of interest rate derivatives employed to manage interest rate risk. Long-term debt excludes capital lease amounts (shown separately).
(b)Preferred stock does not mature; therefore, amounts are provided for the next five years only.
(c)Includes derivative liabilities related to cash flow hedges of forecasted debt, as well as energy-related derivatives. For additional information, see Notes 1 and 14 to the financial statements.
(d)Excludes PPAs that are accounted for as leases and are included in purchased power.
(e)Alabama Power provides estimated capital expenditures for a five-year period, including capital expenditures associated with environmental regulations. These amounts exclude contractual purchase commitments for nuclear fuel, capital expenditures covered under LTSAs, and estimated capital expenditures for AROs, which are reflected in "Fuel," "Other," and "ARO settlements," respectively. At December 31, 2018, purchase commitments were outstanding in connection with the construction program. See FUTURE EARNINGS POTENTIAL – "Environmental Matters – Environmental Laws and Regulations" herein for additional information.
(f)Includes commitments to purchase coal, nuclear fuel, and natural gas, as well as the related transportation and storage. In most cases, these contracts contain provisions for price escalation, minimum purchase levels, and other financial commitments. Natural gas purchase commitments are based on various indices at the time of delivery. Amounts reflected for natural gas purchase commitments have been estimated based on the NYMEX future prices at December 31, 2018.
(g)Estimated minimum long-term obligations for various long-term commitments for the purchase of capacity and energy.
(h)Includes LTSAs and contracts for the procurement of limestone. LTSAs include price escalation based on inflation indices.
(i)
Represents estimated costs for a five-year period associated with closing and monitoring ash ponds in accordance with the CCR Rule and the related state rule, which are reflected in Alabama Power's ARO liabilities. Material expenditures in future years for ARO settlements also will be required for ash ponds, nuclear decommissioning, and other liabilities reflected in Alabama Power's AROs. See FUTURE EARNINGS POTENTIAL – "Environmental MattersEnvironmental Laws and RegulationsCoal Combustion Residuals" herein and Note 6 to the financial statements for additional information.
(j)Alabama Power forecasts contributions to the pension and other postretirement benefit plans over a three-year period. Alabama Power anticipates no mandatory contributions to the qualified pension plan during the next three years. Amounts presented represent estimated benefit payments for the nonqualified pension plans, estimated non-trust benefit payments for the other postretirement benefit plans, and estimated contributions to the other postretirement benefit plan trusts, all of which will be made from Alabama Power's corporate assets. See Note 11 to the financial statements for additional information related to the pension and other postretirement benefit plans, including estimated benefit payments. Certain benefit payments will be made through the related benefit plans. Other benefit payments will be made from Alabama Power's corporate assets.

MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
Georgia Power Company 2018 Annual Report



OVERVIEW
Business Activities
Georgia Power operates as a vertically integrated utility providing electric service to retail customers within its traditional service territory located within the State of Georgia and to wholesale customers in the Southeast.
Many factors affect the opportunities, challenges, and risks of Georgia Power's business of providing electric service. These factors include the ability to maintain a constructive regulatory environment, to maintain and grow energy sales and customers, and to effectively manage and secure timely recovery of costs. These costs include those related to projected long-term demand growth, stringent environmental standards, including CCR rules, reliability, fuel, capital expenditures, including new generating facilities and expanding and improving transmission and distribution facilities, and restoration following major storms. Georgia Power has various regulatory mechanisms that operate to address cost recovery. Effectively operating pursuant to these regulatory mechanisms and appropriately balancing required costs and capital expenditures with customer prices will continue to challenge Georgia Power for the foreseeable future. On April 3, 2018, the Georgia PSC approved the Georgia Power Tax Reform Settlement Agreement, which provides for a total of $330 million in customer refunds for 2018 and 2019 and the deferral of certain revenues and tax benefits to be addressed in the Georgia Power 2019 Base Rate Case. The Georgia PSC also approved an increase to Georgia Power's retail equity ratio to address some of the negative cash flow and credit metric impacts of the Tax Reform Legislation. See FUTURE EARNINGS POTENTIAL – "Retail Regulatory Matters – Rate Plans" herein for additional information on the Georgia Power Tax Reform Settlement Agreement.
Georgia Power continues to focus on several key performance indicators, including, but not limited to, customer satisfaction, plant availability, system reliability, the execution of major construction projects, and net income. Georgia Power's financial success is directly tied to customer satisfaction. Key elements of ensuring customer satisfaction include outstanding service, high reliability, and competitive prices. Management uses customer satisfaction surveys to evaluate Georgia Power's results and generally targets the top quartile of these surveys in measuring performance.
See RESULTS OF OPERATIONS herein for information on Georgia Power's financial performance.
Plant Vogtle Units 3 and 4 Status
In 2009, the Georgia PSC certified construction of Plant Vogtle Units 3 and 4 (with electric generating capacity of approximately 1,100 MWs each). Georgia Power holds a 45.7% ownership interest in Plant Vogtle Units 3 and 4. In March 2017, the EPC Contractor filed for bankruptcy protection under Chapter 11 of the U.S. Bankruptcy Code. In December 2017, the Georgia PSC approved Georgia Power's recommendation to continue construction. The current expected in-service dates remain November 2021 for Unit 3 and November 2022 for Unit 4.
In the second quarter 2018, Georgia Power revised its base capital cost forecast and estimated contingency to complete construction and start-up of Plant Vogtle Units 3 and 4 to $8.0 billion and $0.4 billion, respectively, for a total project capital cost forecast of $8.4 billion (net of $1.7 billion received under the Guarantee Settlement Agreement and approximately $188 million in related Customer Refunds), with respect to Georgia Power's ownership interest. Although Georgia Power believes these incremental costs are reasonable and necessary to complete the project and the Georgia PSC's order in the seventeenth VCM proceeding specifically states that the construction of Plant Vogtle Units 3 and 4 is not subject to a cost cap, Georgia Power did not seek rate recovery for the $0.7 billion increase in costs included in the current base capital cost forecast (or any related financing costs) in the nineteenth VCM report that was approved by the Georgia PSC on February 19, 2019. In connection with future VCM filings, Georgia Power may request the Georgia PSC to evaluate costs currently included in the construction contingency estimate for rate recovery as and when they are appropriately included in the base capital cost forecast. After considering the significant level of uncertainty that exists regarding the future recoverability of costs included in the construction contingency estimate since the ultimate outcome of these matters is subject to the outcome of future assessments by management, as well as Georgia PSC decisions in these future regulatory proceedings, Georgia Power recorded a total pre-tax charge to income of $1.1 billion ($0.8 billion after tax) in the second quarter 2018.
As a result of the increase in the total project capital cost forecast and Georgia Power's decision not to seek rate recovery of the increase in the base capital costs, the holders of at least 90% of the ownership interests in Plant Vogtle Units 3 and 4 were required to vote to continue construction. On September 26, 2018, the Vogtle Owners unanimously voted to continue construction of Plant Vogtle Units 3 and 4. In connection with the vote to continue construction, Georgia Power entered into (i) a binding term sheet (Vogtle Owner Term Sheet) with the other Vogtle Owners and certain of MEAG's wholly-owned subsidiaries, including MEAG Power SPVJ, LLC (MEAG SPVJ), to take certain actions which partially mitigate potential financial exposure for the other Vogtle Owners and (ii) a term sheet (MEAG Term Sheet) with MEAG and MEAG SPVJ to provide funding with respect to MEAG

MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS (continued)
Georgia Power Company 2018 Annual Report

SPVJ's ownership interest in Plant Vogtle Units 3 and 4 under certain circumstances. On January 14, 2019, Georgia Power, MEAG, and MEAG SPVJ entered into an agreement to implement the provisions of the MEAG Term Sheet. On February 18, 2019, Georgia Power, the other Vogtle Owners, and certain of MEAG's wholly-owned subsidiaries entered into certain amendments to their joint ownership agreements to implement the provisions of the Vogtle Owner Term Sheet.
The ultimate outcome of these matters cannot be determined at this time.
See FUTURE EARNINGS POTENTIAL – "Retail Regulatory Matters – Nuclear Construction" herein for additional information on Plant Vogtle Units 3 and 4.
Earnings
Georgia Power's 2018 net income after dividends on preferred and preference stock was $0.8 billion, representing a $621 million, or 43.9%, decrease from the previous year. The decrease was due primarily to a $1.1 billion ($0.8 billion after tax) charge in the second quarter 2018 for an estimated probable loss related to Georgia Power's construction of Plant Vogtle Units 3 and 4, revenues deferred as a regulatory liability for customer bill credits related to the Tax Reform Legislation, an adjustment for an expected refund to retail customers as a result of Georgia Power's retail ROE exceeding the allowed retail ROE range under the 2013 ARP in 2018, and higher non-fuel operations and maintenance expenses. Partially offsetting the decrease were lower federal income tax expense as a result of the Tax Reform Legislation and an increase in retail revenues associated with colder weather in the first quarter 2018 and warmer weather in the second and third quarters 2018 compared to the corresponding periods in 2017.
Georgia Power's 2017 net income after dividends on preferred and preference stock was $1.4 billion, representing an $84 million, or 6.3%, increase from the previous year. The increase was due primarily to lower non-fuel operations and maintenance expenses, primarily as a result of cost containment and modernization initiatives, partially offset by lower revenues resulting from milder weather and lower customer usage as compared to 2016.
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
A condensed income statement for Georgia Power follows:
 Amount 
Increase (Decrease)
from Prior Year
 2018 2018 2017
 (in millions)
Operating revenues$8,420
 $110
 $(73)
Fuel1,698
 27
 (136)
Purchased power1,153
 115
 159
Other operations and maintenance1,860
 136
 (279)
Depreciation and amortization923
 28
 40
Taxes other than income taxes437
 28
 4
Estimated loss on Plant Vogtle Units 3 and 41,060
 1,060
 
Total operating expenses7,131
 1,394
 (212)
Operating income1,289
 (1,284) 139
Interest expense, net of amounts capitalized397
 (22) 31
Other income (expense), net115
 11
 23
Income taxes214
 (616) 50
Net income793
 (635) 81
Dividends on preferred and preference stock
 (14) (3)
Net income after dividends on preferred and preference stock$793
 $(621) $84

MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS (continued)
Georgia Power Company 2018 Annual Report

Operating Revenues
Operating revenues for 2018 were $8.4 billion, reflecting a $110 million increase from 2017. Details of operating revenues were as follows:
 2018 2017
 (in millions)
Retail — prior year$7,738
 $7,772
Estimated change resulting from —   
Rates and pricing(363) 114
Sales growth (decline)92
 (33)
Weather131
 (166)
Fuel cost recovery154
 51
Retail — current year7,752
 7,738
Wholesale revenues —   
Non-affiliates163
 163
Affiliates24
 26
Total wholesale revenues187
 189
Other operating revenues481
 383
Total operating revenues$8,420
 $8,310
Percent change1.3% (0.9)%
Retail revenues of $7.8 billion in 2018 increased $14 million, or 0.2%, compared to 2017. The significant factors driving this change are shown in the preceding table. The decrease in rates and pricing was primarily due to revenues deferred as a regulatory liability for customer bill credits related to the Tax Reform Legislation and an adjustment for an expected refund to retail customers as a result of Georgia Power's retail ROE exceeding the allowed retail ROE range under the 2013 ARP in 2018. See Note 2 to the financial statements under "Georgia Power – Rate Plans" for additional information.
Retail revenues of $7.7 billion in 2017 decreased $34 million, or 0.4%, compared to 2016. The significant factors driving this change are shown in the preceding table. The increase in rates and pricing was primarily due to an increase in revenues related to the recovery of Plant Vogtle Units 3 and 4 construction financing costs under the NCCR tariff. See Note 2 to the financial statements under "Georgia Power – Nuclear Construction – Regulatory Matters" for additional information on the NCCR tariff.
See "Energy Sales" below for a discussion of changes in the volume of energy sold, including changes related to sales growth (decline) and weather.
Electric rates include provisions to adjust billings for fluctuations in fuel costs, including the energy component of purchased power costs. Under these fuel cost recovery provisions, fuel revenues generally equal fuel expenses and do not affect net income. See FUTURE EARNINGS POTENTIAL – "Retail Regulatory Matters – Fuel Cost Recovery" herein for additional information.
Wholesale revenues from power sales to non-affiliated utilities were as follows:
 2018 2017 2016
 (in millions)
Capacity and other$54
 $67
 $72
Energy109
 96
 103
Total non-affiliated$163
 $163
 $175
Wholesale capacity revenues from PPAs are recognized either on a levelized basis over the appropriate contract period or the amounts billable under the contract terms and provide for recovery of fixed costs and a return on investment. Wholesale revenues from sales to non-affiliates will vary depending on fuel prices, the market prices of wholesale energy compared to the cost of Georgia Power's and the Southern Company system's generation, demand for energy within the Southern Company system's electric service territory, and the availability of the Southern Company system's generation. Increases and decreases in energy revenues that are driven by fuel prices are accompanied by an increase or decrease in fuel costs and do not have a significant

MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS (continued)
Georgia Power Company 2018 Annual Report

impact on net income. Short-term opportunity sales are made at market-based rates that generally provide a margin above Georgia Power's variable cost of energy.
Wholesale revenues from non-affiliated sales remained flat in 2018 as compared to 2017. Capacity revenues decreased $13 million, offset by a $13 million increase in energy revenues. The decrease in capacity revenues was primarily due to the expiration of a wholesale contract in the fourth quarter 2017. The increase in energy revenues was primarily due to increased demand, partially offset by the effects of expired contracts. Wholesale revenues from non-affiliated sales decreased $12 million, or 6.9%, in 2017 as compared to 2016. The decrease was related to decreases of $5 million in capacity revenues and $7 million in energy revenues. The decrease in capacity revenues reflects the expiration of wholesale contracts in the first and second quarters of 2016. The decrease in energy revenues was primarily due to lower demand and the effects of the expired contracts.
Wholesale revenues from sales to affiliated companies will vary depending on demand and the availability and cost of generating resources at each company. These affiliate sales are made in accordance with the IIC, as approved by the FERC. These transactions do not have a significant impact on earnings since this energy is generally sold at marginal cost. In 2018, wholesale revenues from sales to affiliates decreased $2 million as compared to 2017. In 2017, wholesale revenues from sales to affiliates decreased $16 million as compared to 2016 due to a 42.8% decrease in KWH sales as a result of the lower market cost of available energy compared to the cost of Georgia Power-owned generation.
Other operating revenues increased $98 million, or 25.6%, in 2018 from the prior year largely due to $94 million of revenues primarily from unregulated sales of products and services that were reclassified as other revenues as a result of the adoption of ASC 606, Revenue from Contracts with Customers (ASC 606). In prior periods, these revenues were included in other income (expense), net. See Note 1 to the financial statements for additional information regarding Georgia Power's adoption of ASC 606.
Other operating revenues decreased $11 million, or 2.8%, in 2017 from the prior year primarily due to a $15 million decrease in open access transmission tariff revenues, primarily as a result of the expiration of long-term transmission services contracts, and a $14 million adjustment in 2016 for customer temporary facilities services revenues, partially offset by a $13 million increase in outdoor lighting sales revenues due to increased sales in new and replacement markets, primarily attributable to LED conversions.
Energy Sales
Changes in revenues are influenced heavily by the change in the volume of energy sold from year to year. KWH sales for 2018 and the percent change from the prior year were as follows:
 
Total
KWHs
 
Total KWH
Percent Change
 
Weather-Adjusted
Percent Change
 2018 2018 2017 2018 2017
 (in billions)        
Residential28.3
 8.4 % (5.2)% 2.6% (0.2)%
Commercial33.0
 2.5
 (2.4) 1.6
 (0.9)
Industrial23.7
 0.6
 (1.0) 0.2
 (0.1)
Other0.5
 (6.0) (4.2) (6.3) (4.0)
Total retail85.5
 3.8
 (2.9) 1.5% (0.4)%
Wholesale         
Non-affiliates3.2
 (4.2) (4.0)    
Affiliates0.5
 (34.2) (42.8)    
Total wholesale3.7
 (10.1) (15.3)    
Total energy sales89.2
 3.1 % (3.6)%    
Changes in retail energy sales are generally the result of changes in electricity usage by customers, changes in weather, and changes in the number of customers.
In 2018, KWH sales for the residential class increased 8.4% compared to 2017 primarily due to colder weather in the first quarter 2018 and warmer weather in the second and third quarters 2018 compared to the corresponding periods in 2017. Weather-adjusted residential KWH sales and weather-adjusted commercial KWH sales increased by 2.6% and 1.6%, respectively, largely due to customer growth. Weather-adjusted industrial KWH sales were essentially flat primarily due to increased demand in the primary and fabricated metal sectors, offset by decreased demand in the textiles and stone, clay, and glass sectors. Additionally, customer usage for all customer classes increased due to the negative impacts of Hurricane Irma in 2017.

MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS (continued)
Georgia Power Company 2018 Annual Report

In 2017, KWH sales for the residential class decreased 5.2% compared to 2016 primarily due to milder weather in 2017. Weather-adjusted residential KWH sales decreased by 0.2% primarily due to a decline in average customer usage resulting from an increase in multi-family housing and energy saving initiatives, partially offset by customer growth. Weather-adjusted commercial KWH sales decreased by 0.9% primarily due to a decline in average customer usage resulting from an increase in electronic commerce transactions and energy saving initiatives, partially offset by customer growth. Weather-adjusted industrial KWH sales were essentially flat primarily due to decreased demand in the chemicals and paper sectors, offset by increased demand in the textile, non-manufacturing, and rubber sectors. Additionally, Hurricane Irma negatively impacted customer usage for all customer classes in 2017.
See "Operating Revenues" above for a discussion of significant changes in wholesale sales to non-affiliates and affiliated companies.
Fuel and Purchased Power Expenses
Fuel costs constitute one of the largest expenses for Georgia Power. The mix of fuel sources for the generation of electricity is determined primarily by demand, the unit cost of fuel consumed, and the availability of generating units. Additionally, Georgia Power purchases a portion of its electricity needs from the wholesale market.
Details of Georgia Power's generation and purchased power were as follows:
 2018 2017 2016
Total generation (in billions of KWHs)
65.2
 63.2
 68.4
Total purchased power (in billions of KWHs)
27.9
 26.9
 24.8
Sources of generation (percent) —
     
Gas42
 41
 38
Coal30
 32
 36
Nuclear25
 25
 24
Hydro3
 2
 2
Cost of fuel, generated (in cents per net KWH) 
     
Gas2.75
 2.68
 2.36
Coal3.21
 3.17
 3.28
Nuclear0.82
 0.83
 0.85
Average cost of fuel, generated (in cents per net KWH)
2.40
 2.36
 2.33
Average cost of purchased power (in cents per net KWH)(*)
4.79
 4.62
 4.53
(*) Average cost of purchased power includes fuel purchased by Georgia Power for tolling agreements where power is generated by the provider.
Fuel and purchased power expenses were $2.9 billion in 2018, an increase of $142 million, or 5.2%, compared to 2017. The increase was primarily due to a $74 million increase in the average cost of fuel and purchased power primarily related to higher natural gas and energy prices and an increase of $68 million related to the volume of KWHs generated and purchased primarily due to colder weather in the first quarter 2018 and warmer weather in the second and third quarters 2018 compared to the corresponding periods in 2017.
Fuel and purchased power expenses were $2.7 billion in 2017, an increase of $23 million, or 0.9%, compared to 2016. The increase was primarily due to an $84 million increase in the average cost of fuel and purchased power primarily related to higher natural gas prices, partially offset by a net decrease of $61 million related to the volume of KWHs generated and purchased primarily due to milder weather, resulting in lower customer demand.
Fuel and purchased power energy transactions do not have a significant impact on earnings since these fuel expenses are generally offset by fuel revenues through Georgia Power's fuel cost recovery mechanism. See FUTURE EARNINGS POTENTIAL – "Retail Regulatory Matters – Fuel Cost Recovery" herein for additional information.
Fuel
Fuel expense was $1.7 billion in 2018, an increase of $27 million, or 1.6%, compared to 2017. The increase was primarily due to an increase of 2.6% in the average cost of natural gas per KWH generated and an increase of 1.9% in the volume of KWHs generated largely due to colder weather in the first quarter 2018 and warmer weather in the second and third quarters 2018 compared to the corresponding periods in 2017. Fuel expense was $1.7 billion in 2017, a decrease of $136 million, or 7.5%,

MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS (continued)
Georgia Power Company 2018 Annual Report

compared to 2016. The decrease was primarily due to a decrease of 7.7% in the volume of KWHs generated largely due to milder weather, resulting in lower customer demand, partially offset by an increase of 13.6% in the average cost of natural gas per KWH generated.
Purchased Power - Non-Affiliates
Purchased power expense from non-affiliates was $430 million in 2018, an increase of $14 million, or 3.4%, compared to 2017. The increase was primarily due to an 8.5% increase in the average cost per KWH purchased primarily due to higher energy prices, partially offset by a decrease of 3.8% in volume of KWHs purchased primarily due to the higher market cost of available energy as compared to Southern Company system resources. Purchased power expense from non-affiliates was $416 million in 2017, an increase of $55 million, or 15.2%, compared to 2016. The increase was primarily due to a 13.4% increase in the volume of KWHs purchased primarily due to unplanned outages at Georgia Power-owned generating units.
Energy purchases from non-affiliates will vary depending on the market prices of wholesale energy as compared to the cost of the Southern Company system's generation, demand for energy within the Southern Company system's electric service territory, and the availability of the Southern Company system's generation.
Purchased Power - Affiliates
Purchased power expense from affiliates was $723 million in 2018, an increase of $101 million, or 16.2%, compared to 2017. The increase was primarily due to a 6.3% increase in the volume of KWHs purchased due to colder weather in the first quarter 2018 and scheduled generation outages and warmer weather in the second and third quarters 2018 and a 3.0% increase in the average cost per KWH purchased primarily resulting from higher energy prices. Purchased power expense from affiliates was $622 million in 2017, an increase of $104 million, or 20.1%, compared to 2016. The increase was primarily due to a 7.0% increase in the volume of KWHs purchased to support Southern Company system transmission reliability and as a result of unplanned outages at Georgia Power-owned generating units and a 1.8% increase in the average cost per KWH purchased primarily resulting from higher natural gas prices.
Energy purchases from affiliates will vary depending on the demand and the availability and cost of generating resources at each company within the Southern Company system. These purchases are made in accordance with the IIC or other contractual agreements, all as approved by the FERC.
Other Operations and Maintenance Expenses
In 2018, other operations and maintenance expenses increased $136 million, or 7.9%, compared to 2017. The increase was primarily due to $88 million of expenses from unregulated sales of products and services that were reclassified to other operations and maintenance expenses as a result of the adoption of ASC 606. In prior periods, these expenses were included in other income (expense), net. Also contributing to the increase were a $39 million decrease in gains on sales of assets and a $28 million increase in transmission and distribution overhead line maintenance, primarily related to additional vegetation management, partially offset by a decrease of $18 million associated with an employee attrition plan in 2017. See Note 1 to the financial statements for additional information regarding Georgia Power's adoption of ASC 606.
In 2017, other operations and maintenance expenses decreased $279 million, or 13.9%, compared to 2016. The decrease was primarily due to cost containment and modernization activities implemented in the third quarter 2016 that contributed to decreases of $85 million in generation maintenance costs, $46 million in transmission and distribution overhead line maintenance, $22 million in employee benefits, and $22 million in customer accounts and sales costs. Other factors include a $40 million increase in gains on sales of assets, a $19 million decrease in scheduled generation outage costs, and a $15 million decrease in customer assistance expenses, primarily in demand-side management costs related to the timing of new programs.
Depreciation and Amortization
Depreciation and amortization increased $28 million, or 3.1%, in 2018 compared to 2017. The increase was primarily due to additional plant in service.
Depreciation and amortization increased $40 million, or 4.7%, in 2017 compared to 2016. The increase was primarily due to a $33 million increase related to additional plant in service and a $14 million decrease in amortization of regulatory liabilities related to other cost of removal obligations that expired in December 2016, partially offset by a $9 million decrease in depreciation related to generating unit retirements in 2016 and amortization of regulatory assets related to certain cancelled environmental and fuel conversion projects that expired in December 2016.
See Note 5 to the financial statements under "Depreciation and Amortization" for additional information.

MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS (continued)
Georgia Power Company 2018 Annual Report

Taxes Other Than Income Taxes
In 2018, taxes other than income taxes increased $28 million, or 6.8%, compared to 2017 primarily due to increases of $19 million in property taxes as a result of an increase in the assessed value of property and $11 million in municipal franchise fees largely related to higher retail revenues. In 2017, taxes other than income taxes increased $4 million, or 1.0%, compared to 2016.
Estimated Loss on Plant Vogtle Units 3 and 4
In the second quarter 2018, an estimated probable loss of $1.1 billion was recorded to reflect Georgia Power's revised estimate to complete construction and start-up of Plant Vogtle Units 3 and 4, which reflects the increase in costs included in the revised base capital cost forecast for which Georgia Power did not seek rate recovery and costs included in the revised construction contingency estimate for which Georgia Power may seek rate recovery as and when such costs are appropriately included in the base capital cost forecast. See Note 2 to the financial statements under "Georgia Power – Nuclear Construction" for additional information.
Interest Expense, Net of Amounts Capitalized
In 2018, interest expense, net of amounts capitalized decreased $22 million, or 5.3%, compared to 2017 and increased $31 million, or 8.0%, compared to 2016 primarily due to changes in outstanding borrowings.
Other Income (Expense), Net
In 2018, other income (expense), net increased $11 million compared to the prior year primarily due to an increase in AFUDC equity of $29 million resulting from a higher AFUDC rate due to a higher equity ratio and lower short-term borrowings, partially offset by a decrease of $21 million associated with revenues and expenses, net primarily from unregulated sales of products and services. In 2018, these revenues and expenses are included in other revenues and other operations and maintenance expenses, respectively, as a result of the adoption of ASC 606. See Note 1 to the financial statements for additional information regarding Georgia Power's adoption of ASC 606.
In 2017, other income (expense), net increased $23 million compared to the prior year primarily due to a $28 million decrease in the non-service cost components of net periodic pension and other postretirement benefit costs, a $7 million increase in third party infrastructure services revenue, and a $6 million increase in wholesale operating fee revenue associated with contractual targets, partially offset by a $10 million increase in charitable donations and an $8 million decrease in AFUDC equity resulting from higher short-term borrowings. See Notes 1 under "Recently Adopted Accounting Standards" and 11 to the financial statements for additional information on Georgia Power's net periodic pension and other postretirement benefit costs.
Income Taxes
Income taxes decreased $616 million, or 74.2%, in 2018 compared to the prior year primarily due to a lower federal income tax rate as a result of the Tax Reform Legislation and the reduction in pre-tax earnings resulting from the estimated probable loss related to Plant Vogtle Units 3 and 4.
Income taxes increased $50 million, or 6.4%, in 2017 compared to the prior year primarily due to higher pre-tax earnings, partially offset by an adjustment related to the Tax Reform Legislation.
See Note 10 to the financial statements for additional information.
Environmental Accounting Order
Based on an order from the Alabama PSC, the Company is allowed to establish a regulatory asset to record the unrecovered investment costs, including the unrecovered plant asset balance and the unrecovered costs associated with site removal and closure associated with future unit retirements caused by environmental regulations. The regulatory asset will be amortized and recovered over the affected unit's remaining useful life, as established prior to the decision regarding early retirement through Rate CNP Compliance. See "Environmental Matters – Environmental Laws and Regulations" herein for additional information regarding environmental regulations.
Income Tax Matters
Federal Tax Reform Legislation
On December 22, 2017, the Tax Reform Legislation was signed into law and became effective on January 1, 2018. The Tax Reform Legislation, among other things, reduces the federal corporate income tax rate to 21%, retains normalization provisions for public utility property and existing renewable energy incentives, and repeals the corporate alternative minimum tax.

MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS (continued)
Alabama Power Company 2017 Annual Report

Regulated utility businesses can continue deducting all business interest expense and are not eligible for bonus depreciation on capital assets acquired and placed in service after September 27, 2017. Projects with binding contracts before September 28, 2017 and placed in service after September 27, 2017 remain eligible for bonus depreciation under the Protecting Americans from Tax Hikes (PATH) Act.
In addition, under the Tax Reform Legislation, net operating losses (NOL) generated after December 31, 2017 can no longer be carried back to previous tax years but can be carried forward indefinitely, with utilization limited to 80% of taxable income in the subsequent tax year. The projected reduction of Southern Company's consolidated income tax liability resulting from the tax rate reduction also delays the expected utilization of existing tax credit carryforwards.
For the year ended December 31, 2017, implementation of the Tax Reform Legislation resulted in an estimated net tax expense of $3 million, a $271 million decrease in regulatory assets, and a $2.0 billion increase in regulatory liabilities, primarily due to the impact of the reduction of the corporate income tax rate on deferred tax assets and liabilities.
The Tax Reform Legislation is subject to further interpretation and guidance from the IRS, as well as each respective state's adoption. In addition, the regulatory treatment of certain impacts of the Tax Reform Legislation is subject to the discretion of the FERC and the Alabama PSC. On January 31, 2018, SCS, on behalf of the traditional electric operating companies (including the Company), filed with the FERC a reduction to the Company's open access transmission tariff charge for 2018 to reflect the revised federal corporate tax rate. See Note 3 to the financial statements under "Regulatory Matters – Rate RSE" for additional information.
See FINANCIAL CONDITION AND LIQUIDITY – "Credit Rating Risk" herein and Note 5 to the financial statements under "Federal Tax Reform Legislation" for additional information.
The ultimate outcome of these matters cannot be determined at this time.
Bonus Depreciation
Under the Tax Reform Legislation, projects with binding contracts prior to September 28, 2017 and placed in service after September 27, 2017 remain eligible for bonus depreciation under the PATH Act. The PATH Act allowed for 50% bonus depreciation for 2015 through 2017, 40% bonus depreciation for 2018, and 30% bonus depreciation for 2019 and certain long-lived assets placed in service in 2020. Based on provisional estimates, approximately $200 million of positive cash flows is expected to result from bonus depreciation for the 2017 tax year and approximately $90 million for the 2018 tax year. Should Southern Company have a NOL in 2018, all of these cash flows may not be fully realized in 2018. See Note 5 to the financial statements under "Current and Deferred Income Taxes" for additional information.
Other Matters
The Company is involved in various other matters being litigated and regulatory matters that could affect future earnings. In addition, the Company is subject to certain claims and legal actions arising in the ordinary course of business. The Company's business activities are subject to extensive governmental regulation related to public health and the environment, such as regulation of air emissions and water discharges. Litigation over environmental issues and claims of various types, including property damage, personal injury, common law nuisance, and citizen enforcement of environmental requirements such as standards for air, water, land, and protection of other natural resources, has occurred throughout the U.S. This litigation has included claims for damages alleged to have been caused by CO2 and other emissions, CCR, and alleged exposure to hazardous materials, and/or requests for injunctive relief in connection with such matters.
The ultimate outcome of such pending or potential litigation or regulatory matters cannot be predicted at this time; however, for current proceedings not specifically reported herein or in Note 3 to the financial statements, management does not anticipate that the ultimate liabilities, if any, arising from such current proceedings would have a material effect on the Company's financial statements. See Note 3 to the financial statements for a discussion of various other contingencies, regulatory matters, and other matters being litigated which may affect future earnings potential.
ACCOUNTING POLICIES
Application of Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates
The Company prepares its financial statements in accordance with GAAP. Significant accounting policies are described in Note 1 to the financial statements. In the application of these policies, certain estimates are made that may have a material impact on the Company's results of operations and related disclosures. Different assumptions and measurements could produce estimates that

MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS (continued)
Alabama Power Company 2017 Annual Report

are significantly different from those recorded in the financial statements. Senior management has reviewed and discussed the following critical accounting policies and estimates with the Audit Committee of Southern Company's Board of Directors.
Utility Regulation
The Company is subject to retail regulation by the Alabama PSC and wholesale regulation by the FERC. As a result, the Company applies accounting standards which require the financial statements to reflect the effects of rate regulation. Through the ratemaking process, the regulators may require the inclusion of costs or revenues in periods different than when they would be recognized by a non-regulated company. This treatment may result in the deferral of expenses and the recording of related regulatory assets based on anticipated future recovery through rates or the deferral of gains or creation of liabilities and the recording of related regulatory liabilities. The application of the accounting standards has a further effect on the Company's financial statements as a result of the estimates of allowable costs used in the ratemaking process. These estimates may differ from those actually incurred by the Company; therefore, the accounting estimates inherent in specific costs such as depreciation, AROs, and pension and other postretirement benefits have less of a direct impact on the Company's results of operations and financial condition than they would on a non-regulated company.
As reflected in Note 1 to the financial statements, significant regulatory assets and liabilities have been recorded. Management reviews the ultimate recoverability of these regulatory assets and any requirement to refund these regulatory liabilities based on applicable regulatory guidelines and GAAP. However, adverse legislative, judicial, or regulatory actions could materially impact the amounts of such regulatory assets and liabilities and could adversely impact the Company's financial statements.
Federal Tax Reform Legislation
Following the enactment of Tax Reform Legislation, the SEC staff issued Staff Accounting Bulletin 118 – "Income Tax Accounting Implications of the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act" (SAB 118), which provides for a measurement period of up to one year from the enactment date to complete accounting under GAAP for the tax effects of the legislation. Due to the complex and comprehensive nature of the enacted tax law changes, and their application under GAAP, the Company considers all amounts recorded in the financial statements as a result of Tax Reform Legislation to be "provisional" as discussed in SAB 118 and subject to revision. The Company is awaiting additional guidance from industry and income tax authorities in order to finalize its accounting. The ultimate impact of Tax Reform Legislation on deferred income tax assets and liabilities and the related regulatory assets and liabilities cannot be determined at this time. See FUTURE EARNINGS POTENTIAL – "Income Tax Matters – Federal Tax Reform Legislation" herein and Notes 3 and 5 to the financial statements under "Retail Regulatory Matters – Rate RSE" and "Current and Deferred Income Taxes," respectively, for additional information.
Asset Retirement Obligations
AROs are computed as the fair value of the estimated ultimate costs for an asset's future retirement and are recorded in the period in which the liability is incurred. The costs are capitalized as part of the related long-lived asset and depreciated over the asset's useful life. In the absence of quoted market prices, AROs are estimated using present value techniques in which estimates of future cash outlays associated with the asset retirements are discounted using a credit-adjusted risk-free rate. Estimates of the timing and amounts of future cash outlays are based on projections of when and how the assets will be retired and the cost of future removal activities.
The liability for AROs primarily relates to the decommissioning of the Company's nuclear facility, Plant Farley, and facilities that are subject to the CCR Rule, principally ash ponds. In addition, the Company has retirement obligations related to various landfill sites, underground storage tanks, asbestos removal related to ongoing repair and maintenance, disposal of polychlorinated biphenyls in certain transformers, and disposal of sulfur hexafluoride gas in certain substation breakers. The Company also has identified retirement obligations related to certain transmission and distribution facilities, asbestos containing material within long-term assets not subject to ongoing repair and maintenance activities, and certain wireless communication towers. However, liabilities for the removal of these assets have not been recorded because the settlement timing for the retirement obligations related to these assets is indeterminable and, therefore, the fair value of the retirement obligations cannot be reasonably estimated. A liability for these AROs will be recognized when sufficient information becomes available to support a reasonable estimation of the ARO.
The cost estimates for AROs related to the disposal of CCR are based on information using various assumptions related to closure and post-closure costs, timing of future cash outlays, inflation and discount rates, and the potential methods for complying with the CCR Rule requirements for closure in place. As further analysis is performed and closure details are developed, the Company will continue to periodically update these cost estimates as necessary. See FUTURE EARNINGS POTENTIAL – "Environmental Matters – Environmental Laws and Regulations – Coal Combustion Residuals" herein and Note 1 to the financial statements under "Asset Retirement Obligations and Other Costs of Removal" and "Nuclear Decommissioning" for additional information.

MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS (continued)
Alabama Power Company 2017 Annual Report

Given the significant judgment involved in estimating AROs, the Company considers the liabilities for AROs to be critical accounting estimates.
Pension and Other Postretirement Benefits
The Company's calculation of pension and other postretirement benefits expense is dependent on a number of assumptions. These assumptions include discount rates, healthcare cost trend rates, expected long-term return on plan assets, mortality rates, expected salary and wage increases, and other factors. Components of pension and other postretirement benefits expense include interest and service cost on the pension and other postretirement benefit plans, expected return on plan assets, and amortization of certain unrecognized costs and obligations. Actual results that differ from the assumptions utilized are accumulated and amortized over future periods and, therefore, generally affect recognized expense and the recorded obligation in future periods. While the Company believes that the assumptions used are appropriate, differences in actual experience or significant changes in assumptions would affect its pension and other postretirement benefits costs and obligations.
Key elements in determining the Company's pension and other postretirement benefit expense are the expected long-term return on plan assets and the discount rate used to measure the benefit plan obligations and the periodic benefit plan expense for future periods. The expected long-term return on pension and other postretirement benefit plan assets is based on the Company's investment strategy, historical experience, and expectations for long-term rates of return that consider external actuarial advice. The Company determines the long-term return on plan assets by applying the long-term rate of expected returns on various asset classes to the Company's target asset allocation. For purposes of determining its liability related to the pension and other postretirement benefit plans, the Company discounts the future related cash flows using a single-point discount rate developed from the weighted average of market-observed yields for high quality fixed income securities with maturities that correspond to expected benefit payments. For 2015 and prior years, the Company computed the interest cost component of its net periodic pension and other postretirement benefit plan expense using the same single-point discount rate. Beginning in 2016, the Company adopted a full yield curve approach for calculating the interest cost component whereby the discount rate for each year is applied to the liability for that specific year. As a result, the interest cost component of net periodic pension and other postretirement benefit plan expense decreased by approximately $24 million in 2016.
A 25 basis point change in any significant assumption (discount rate, salaries, or long-term return on plan assets) would result in an $9 million or less change in total annual benefit expense and a $128 million or less change in projected obligations.
The Company recorded pension costs of $9 million, $11 million, and $48 million in 2017, 2016, and 2015, respectively. Postretirement benefit costs for the Company were $3 million, $4 million, and $5 million in 2017, 2016, and 2015, respectively. Such amounts are dependent on several factors including trust earnings and changes to the plans. A portion of pension and other postretirement benefit costs is capitalized based on construction-related labor charges. Pension and other postretirement benefit costs are a component of the regulated rates and generally do not have a long-term effect on net income.
See Note 2 to the financial statements for additional information regarding pension and other postretirement benefits.
Contingent Obligations
The Company is subject to a number of federal and state laws and regulations, as well as other factors and conditions that subject it to environmental, litigation, and other risks. See FUTURE EARNINGS POTENTIAL herein and Note 3 to the financial statements for more information regarding certain of these contingencies. The Company periodically evaluates its exposure to such risks and records reserves for those matters where a non-tax-related loss is considered probable and reasonably estimable. The adequacy of reserves can be significantly affected by external events or conditions that can be unpredictable; thus, the ultimate outcome of such matters could materially affect the Company's results of operations, cash flows, or financial condition.
Recently Issued Accounting Standards
Revenue
In 2014, the FASB issued ASC 606, Revenue from Contracts with Customers (ASC 606), replacing the existing accounting standard and industry specific guidance for revenue recognition with a five-step model for recognizing and measuring revenue from contracts with customers. The underlying principle of the new standard is to recognize revenue to depict the transfer of goods or services to customers at the amount expected to be collected. The new standard also requires enhanced disclosures regarding the nature, amount, timing, and uncertainty of revenue and the related cash flows arising from contracts with customers.
Most of the Company's revenue, including energy provided to customers, is from tariff offerings that provide electricity without a defined contractual term, as well as longer-term contractual commitments, including PPAs.

MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS (continued)
Alabama Power Company 2017 Annual Report

The Company has completed the evaluation of all revenue streams and determined that the adoption of ASC 606 will not change the current timing of revenue recognition for such transactions. Some revenue arrangements, such as energy-related derivatives, are excluded from the scope of ASC 606 and, therefore, will be accounted for and disclosed separately from revenues under ASC 606. The Company has concluded contributions in aid of construction are not in scope for ASC 606 and will continue to be accounted for as an offset to property, plant, and equipment.
The new standard is effective for reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2017. The Company applied the modified retrospective method of adoption effective January 1, 2018. The Company also utilized practical expedients which allowed it to apply the standard to open contracts at the date of adoption and to reflect the aggregate effect of all modifications when identifying performance obligations and allocating the transaction price for contracts modified before the effective date. Under the modified retrospective method of adoption, prior year reported results are not restated; however, a cumulative-effect adjustment to retained earnings at January 1, 2018 is recorded. In addition, quarterly disclosures will include comparative information on 2018 financial statement line items under current guidance. The adoption of ASC 606 did not result in a cumulative-effect adjustment.
Leases
In February 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-02, Leases (Topic 842) (ASU 2016-02). ASU 2016-02 requires lessees to recognize on the balance sheet a lease liability and a right-of-use asset for all leases. ASU 2016-02 also changes the recognition, measurement, and presentation of expense associated with leases and provides clarification regarding the identification of certain components of contracts that would represent a lease. The accounting required by lessors is relatively unchanged. ASU 2016-02 is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2018 and the Company will adopt the new standard effective January 1, 2019.
The Company is currently implementing an information technology system along with the related changes to internal controls and accounting policies that will support the accounting for leases under ASU 2016-02. In addition, the Company has substantially completed a detailed inventory and analysis of its leases. In terms of rental charges and duration of contracts, the most significant leases relate to cellular towers, railcars, and a PPA where the Company is the lessee and outdoor lighting and to land where the Company is the lessor. The Company is currently analyzing pole attachment agreements and a lease determination has not been made at this time. While the Company has not yet determined the ultimate impact, adoption of ASU 2016-02 is expected to have a significant impact on the Company's balance sheet.
Other
On March 10, 2017, the FASB issued ASU No. 2017-07, Compensation – Retirement Benefits (Topic 715): Improving the Presentation of Net Periodic Pension Cost and Net Periodic Postretirement Benefit Cost (ASU 2017-07). ASU 2017-07 requires that an employer report the service cost component in the same line item or items as other compensation costs and requires the other components of net periodic pension and postretirement benefit costs to be separately presented in the income statement outside of income from operations. Additionally, only the service cost component is eligible for capitalization, when applicable. However, all cost components remain eligible for capitalization under FERC regulations. ASU 2017-07 will be applied retrospectively for the presentation of the service cost component and the other components of net periodic pension and postretirement benefit costs in the income statement. The capitalization of only the service cost component of net periodic pension and postretirement benefit costs in assets will be applied on a prospective basis. ASU 2017-07 is effective for periods beginning after December 15, 2017. The presentation changes required for net periodic pension and postretirement benefit costs will result in a decrease in the Company's operating income and an increase in other income for 2016 and 2017 and are expected to result in a decrease in operating income and an increase in other income for 2018. The Company adopted ASU 2017-07 effective January 1, 2018 with no material impact on its financial statements.
On August 28, 2017, the FASB issued ASU No. 2017-12, Derivatives and Hedging (Topic 815): Targeted Improvements to Accounting for Hedging Activities (ASU 2017-12), amending the hedge accounting recognition and presentation requirements. ASU 2017-12 makes more financial and non-financial hedging strategies eligible for hedge accounting, amends the related presentation and disclosure requirements, and simplifies hedge effectiveness assessment requirements. ASU 2017-12 is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2018, with early adoption permitted. The Company adopted ASU 2017-12 effective January 1, 2018 with no material impact on its financial statements.
FINANCIAL CONDITION AND LIQUIDITY
Overview
The Company's financial condition remained stable at December 31, 2017. The Company's cash requirements primarily consist of funding ongoing operations, common stock dividends, capital expenditures, and debt maturities. Capital expenditures and other

MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS (continued)
Alabama Power Company 2017 Annual Report

investing activities include investments to meet projected long-term demand requirements, to maintain existing generation facilities, to comply with environmental regulations including adding environmental modifications to certain existing generating units, to expand and improve transmission and distribution facilities, and for restoration following major storms. Operating cash flows provide a substantial portion of the Company's cash needs. For the three-year period from 2018 through 2020, the Company's projected common stock dividends, capital expenditures, and debt maturities are expected to exceed operating cash flows. The Company plans to finance future cash needs in excess of its operating cash flows primarily through external securities issuances, borrowings from financial institutions, or equity contributions from Southern Company. The Company plans to use commercial paper to manage seasonal variations in operating cash flows and for other working capital needs. The Company intends to continue to monitor its access to short-term and long-term capital markets as well as its bank credit arrangements to meet future capital and liquidity needs. See "Sources of Capital," "Financing Activities," and "Capital Requirements and Contractual Obligations" herein for additional information.
The Company's investments in the qualified pension plan and the nuclear decommissioning trust funds increased in value as of December 31, 2017 as compared to December 31, 2016. No contributions to the qualified pension plan were made for the year ended December 31, 2017 and no mandatory contributions to the qualified pension plan are anticipated during 2018. The Company's funding obligations for the nuclear decommissioning trust fund are based on the most recent site study, and the next study is expected to be conducted in 2018. See Notes 1 and 2 to the financial statements under "Nuclear Decommissioning" and "Pension Plans," respectively, for additional information.
Net cash provided from operating activities totaled $1.8 billion for 2017, a decrease of $112 million as compared to 2016. The decrease in cash provided from operating activities was primarily due to the timing of income tax payments in 2017 and the receipt of income tax refunds in 2016 as a result of bonus depreciation, partially offset by the voluntary contribution to the qualified pension plan in 2016. Net cash provided from operating activities totaled $1.9 billion for 2016, a decrease of $193 million as compared to 2015. The decrease in cash provided from operating activities was primarily due to the collection of fuel cost recovery revenues and the voluntary contribution to the qualified pension plan, partially offset by the timing of income tax payments and refunds associated with bonus depreciation.
Net cash used for investing activities totaled $1.9 billion for 2017, $1.4 billion for 2016, and $1.5 billion for 2015. These activities were primarily related to gross property additions for environmental, steam generation, distribution, and transmission assets.
Net cash provided from financing activities totaled $163 million in 2017 primarily due to issuances of long-term debt and additional capital contributions from Southern Company, partially offset by the payment of common stock dividends and maturities of long-term debt. Net cash used for financing activities totaled $285 million in 2016 primarily due to the payment of common stock dividends and a redemption of long-term debt, partially offset by issuances of long-term debt and additional capital contributions from Southern Company. Fluctuations in cash flow from financing activities vary from year to year based on capital needs and the maturity or redemption of securities.
Significant balance sheet changes for 2017 included increases of $1.3 billion in property, plant, and equipment primarily due to additions to distribution and transmission facilities and environmental and steam generation assets and $1.1 billion in long-term debt. Other significant changes included an increase of $2.0 billion in deferred credits related to income taxes and decreases of $1.9 billion in accumulated deferred income taxes primarily due to the change in tax rate resulting from Tax Reform Legislation and $0.6 billion in securities due within one year. See FUTURE EARNINGS POTENTIAL – "Income Tax Matters – Federal Tax Reform Legislation" herein and Note 5 to the financial statements for additional information.
The Company's ratio of common equity to total capitalization plus short-term debt was 46.3% and 46.2% at December 31, 2017 and 2016, respectively. See Note 6 to the financial statements for additional information.
Sources of Capital
The Company plans to obtain the funds to meet its future capital needs from sources similar to those used in the past, which were primarily from operating cash flows, external security issuances, borrowings from financial institutions, and equity contributions from Southern Company. However, the amount, type, and timing of any future financings, if needed, will depend upon prevailing market conditions, regulatory approval, and other factors.
Security issuances are subject to regulatory approval by the Alabama PSC. Additionally, with respect to the public offering of securities, the Company files registration statements with the SEC under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended. The amounts of securities authorized by the Alabama PSC are continuously monitored and appropriate filings are made to ensure flexibility in the capital markets.

MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS (continued)
Alabama Power Company 2017 Annual Report

The Company obtains financing separately without credit support from any affiliate. See Note 6 to the financial statements under "Bank Credit Arrangements" for additional information. The Southern Company system does not maintain a centralized cash or money pool. Therefore, funds of the Company are not commingled with funds of any other company in the Southern Company system.
The Company's current liabilities sometimes exceed current assets because of long-term debt maturities and the periodic use of short-term debt as a funding source, as well as significant seasonal fluctuations in cash needs.
At December 31, 2017, the Company had approximately $544 million of cash and cash equivalents. Committed credit arrangements with banks at December 31, 2017 were as follows:
Expires     Expires Within One Year
2018 2020 2022 Total Unused Term Out No Term Out
(in millions) (in millions) (in millions)
$35
 $500
 $800
 $1,335
 $1,335
 $
 $35
See Note 6 to the financial statements under "Bank Credit Arrangements" for additional information.
In May 2017 and September 2017, the Company amended its $800 million and $500 million multi-year credit arrangements, which, among other things, extended the maturity dates from 2020 to 2022 and 2018 to 2020, respectively, as reflected in the table above.
Most of these bank credit arrangements, as well as the Company's term loan arrangements, contain covenants that limit debt levels and contain cross-acceleration provisions to other indebtedness (including guarantee obligations) of the Company. Such cross-acceleration provisions to other indebtedness would trigger an event of default if the Company defaulted on indebtedness, the payment of which was then accelerated. At December 31, 2017, the Company was in compliance with all such covenants. None of the bank credit arrangements contain material adverse change clauses at the time of borrowings.
Subject to applicable market conditions, the Company expects to renew or replace its bank credit arrangements as needed, prior to expiration. In connection therewith, the Company may extend the maturity dates and/or increase or decrease the lending commitments thereunder.
A portion of the unused credit with banks is allocated to provide liquidity support to the Company's pollution control revenue bonds and commercial paper programs. The amount of variable rate pollution control revenue bonds outstanding requiring liquidity support was $854 million as of December 31, 2017. In addition, at December 31, 2017, the Company had $120 million of fixed rate pollution control revenue bonds outstanding that were required to be remarketed within the next 12 months.
The Company also has substantial cash flow from operating activities and access to the capital markets, including a commercial paper program, to meet liquidity needs. The Company may meet short-term cash needs through its commercial paper program. The Company may also meet short-term cash needs through a Southern Company subsidiary organized to issue and sell commercial paper at the request and for the benefit of the Company and the other traditional electric operating companies. Proceeds from such issuances for the benefit of the Company are loaned directly to the Company. The obligations of each traditional electric operating company under these arrangements are several and there is no cross-affiliate credit support.
Details of short-term borrowings were as follows:
 Short-term Debt at the End of the Period 
Short-term Debt During the Period (*)
 Amount Outstanding Weighted Average Interest Rate Average
Amount Outstanding
 Weighted
Average
Interest
Rate
 Maximum
Amount
Outstanding
 (in millions)   (in millions)   (in millions)
December 31, 2017$3
 3.7% $25
 1.3% $223
December 31, 2016$
 % $16
 0.6% $200
December 31, 2015$
 % $14
 0.2% $100
(*)Average and maximum amounts are based upon daily balances during the 12-month periods ended December 31, 2017, 2016, and 2015.
The Company believes that the need for working capital can be adequately met by utilizing commercial paper programs, lines of credit, and operating cash flows.

MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS (continued)
Alabama Power Company 2017 Annual Report

Financing Activities
In February 2017, the Company repaid at maturity $200 million aggregate principal amount of Series 2007A 5.55% Senior Notes.
In March 2017, the Company issued $550 million aggregate principal amount of Series 2017A 2.45% Senior Notes due March 30, 2022. The proceeds were used to repay the Company's short-term indebtedness and for general corporate purposes, including the Company's continuous construction program.
In August 2017, the Company repaid at maturity $36.1 million aggregate principal amount of Series 1993-A, 1993-B, and 1993-C Industrial Development Board of the City of Mobile, Alabama Pollution Control Revenue Refunding Bonds (Alabama Power Company Project).
In September 2017, the Company issued 10 million shares ($250 million aggregate stated capital) of 5.00% Class A Preferred Stock, Cumulative, Par Value $1 Per Share (Stated Capital $25 Per Share). The proceeds were used in October 2017 to redeem all 2 million shares ($50 million aggregate stated capital) of 6.50% Series Preference Stock, 6 million shares ($150 million aggregate stated capital) of 6.45% Series Preference Stock, and 1.52 million shares ($38 million aggregate stated capital) of 5.83% Class A Preferred Stock and for other general corporate purposes, including the Company's continuous construction program.
In October 2017, the Company repaid at maturity $325 million aggregate principal amount of Series Q 5.50% Senior Notes.
In November 2017, the Company issued $550 million aggregate principal amount of Series 2017B 3.70% Senior Notes due December 1, 2047. The proceeds were used for general corporate purposes, including the Company's continuous construction program.
In addition to any financings that may be necessary to meet capital requirements and contractual obligations, the Company plans to continue, when economically feasible, a program to retire higher-cost securities and replace these obligations with lower-cost capital if market conditions permit.
Credit Rating Risk
At December 31, 2017, the Company did not have any credit arrangements that would require material changes in payment schedules or terminations as a result of a credit rating downgrade.
There are certain contracts that could require collateral, but not accelerated payment, in the event of a credit rating change to BBB and/or Baa2 or below. These contracts are primarily for physical electricity purchases, fuel purchases, fuel transportation and storage, energy price risk management, and transmission.
The maximum potential collateral requirements under these contracts at December 31, 2017 were as follows:
Credit Ratings
Maximum Potential
Collateral
Requirements
 (in millions)
At BBB and/or Baa2$1
At BBB- and/or Baa3$2
Below BBB- and/or Baa3$323
Included in these amounts are certain agreements that could require collateral in the event that either the Company or Georgia Power has a credit rating change to below investment grade. Generally, collateral may be provided by a Southern Company guaranty, letter of credit, or cash. Additionally, a credit rating downgrade could impact the ability of the Company to access capital markets and would be likely to impact the cost at which it does so.
On March 24, 2017, S&P revised its consolidated credit rating outlook for Southern Company and its subsidiaries (including the Company) from stable to negative.
On January 19, 2018, Moody's revised its rating outlook for the Company from stable to negative.
While it is unclear how the credit rating agencies and regulatory authorities may respond to the Tax Reform Legislation, certain financial metrics, such as the funds from operations to debt percentage, used by the credit rating agencies to assess Southern Company and its subsidiaries, including the Company, may be negatively impacted. Absent actions by Southern Company and its subsidiaries, including the Company, to mitigate the resulting impacts, which, among other alternatives, could include adjusting capital structure and/or monetizing regulatory assets, the Company's credit ratings could be negatively affected. See Note 3 to the financial statements under "Retail Regulatory Matters – Rate RSE" for additional information.

MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS (continued)
Alabama Power Company 2017 Annual Report

Market Price Risk
Due to cost-based rate regulation and other various cost recovery mechanisms, the Company continues to have limited exposure to market volatility in interest rates, commodity fuel prices, and prices of electricity. To manage the volatility attributable to these exposures, the Company nets the exposures, where possible, to take advantage of natural offsets and enters into various derivative transactions for the remaining exposures pursuant to the Company's policies in areas such as counterparty exposure and risk management practices. The Company's policy is that derivatives are to be used primarily for hedging purposes and mandates strict adherence to all applicable risk management policies. Derivative positions are monitored using techniques including, but not limited to, market valuation, value at risk, stress testing, and sensitivity analysis.
To mitigate future exposure to changes in interest rates, the Company may enter into derivatives designated as hedges. The weighted average interest rate on $1.1 billion of long-term variable interest rate exposure at December 31, 2017 was 2.3%. If the Company sustained a 100 basis point change in interest rates for all long-term variable interest rate exposure, the change would affect annualized interest expense by approximately $11 million at December 31, 2017. See Note 1 to the financial statements under "Financial Instruments" and Note 11 to the financial statements for additional information.
To mitigate residual risks relative to movements in electricity prices, the Company enters into physical fixed-price contracts for the purchase and sale of electricity through the wholesale electricity market and financial hedge contracts for natural gas purchases. The Company continues to manage a retail fuel-hedging program implemented per the guidelines of the Alabama PSC. The Company had no material change in market risk exposure for the year ended December 31, 2017 when compared to the year ended December 31, 2016.
In addition, Rate ECR allows the recovery of specific costs associated with the sales of natural gas that become necessary due to operating considerations at the Company's electric generating facilities. Rate ECR also allows recovery of the cost of financial instruments used for hedging market price risk up to 75% of the budgeted annual amount of natural gas purchases. The Company may not engage in natural gas hedging activities that extend beyond a rolling 42-month window. Also, the premiums paid for natural gas financial options may not exceed 5% of the Company's natural gas budget for that year.
The changes in fair value of energy-related derivative contracts are substantially attributable to both the volume and the price of natural gas. For the years ended December 31, the changes in fair value of energy-related derivative contracts, the majority of which are composed of regulatory hedges, were as follows:
 
2017
Changes
 
2016
Changes
 Fair Value
 (in millions)
Contracts outstanding at the beginning of the period, assets (liabilities), net$12
 $(54)
Contracts realized or settled(1) 39
Current period changes(*)
(17) 27
Contracts outstanding at the end of the period, assets (liabilities), net$(6) $12
(*)Current period changes also include the changes in fair value of new contracts entered into during the period, if any.
The net hedge volumes of energy-related derivative contracts, for the years ended December 31 were as follows:
 2017 2016
 mmBtu Volume
 (in millions)
Commodity – Natural gas swaps64
 68
Commodity – Natural gas options5
 6
Total hedge volume69
 74
The weighted average swap contract cost above market prices was approximately $0.08 per mmBtu as of December 31, 2017 and below market prices was approximately $0.14 per mmBtu as of December 31, 2016. The change in option fair value is primarily attributable to the volatility of the market and the underlying change in the natural gas price. Substantially all of the natural gas hedge gains and losses are recovered through the Company's retail energy cost recovery clause.

MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS (continued)
Alabama Power Company 2017 Annual Report

At December 31, 2017 and 2016, substantially all of the Company's energy-related derivative contracts were designated as regulatory hedges and were related to the Company's fuel-hedging program. Therefore, gains and losses are initially recorded as regulatory liabilities and assets, respectively, and then are included in fuel expense as they are recovered through the energy cost recovery clause. Certain other gains and losses on energy-related derivatives, designated as cash flow hedges, are initially deferred in OCI before being recognized in income in the same period as the hedged transaction. Gains and losses on energy-related derivative contracts that are not designated or fail to qualify as hedges are recognized in the statements of income as incurred and were not material for any year presented.
The Company uses over-the-counter contracts that are not exchange traded but are fair valued using prices which are market observable, and thus fall into Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy. See Note 10 to the financial statements for further discussion of fair value measurements. The maturities of the energy-related derivative contracts, which are primarily Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy, at December 31, 2017 were as follows:
   Fair Value Measurements
   December 31, 2017
 Total Maturity
 Fair Value  Year 1  Years 2&3
 (in millions)
Level 1$
 $
 $
Level 26
 4
 2
Level 3
 
 
Fair value of contracts outstanding at end of period$6
 $4
 $2
The Company is exposed to market price risk in the event of nonperformance by counterparties to energy-related and interest rate derivative contracts. The Company only enters into agreements and material transactions with counterparties that have investment grade credit ratings by Moody's and S&P, or with counterparties who have posted collateral to cover potential credit exposure. Therefore, the Company does not anticipate market risk exposure from nonperformance by the counterparties. For additional information, see Note 1 to the financial statements under "Financial Instruments" and Note 11 to the financial statements.
Capital Requirements and Contractual Obligations
The construction program of the Company is currently estimated to total $2.2 billion for 2018, $1.6 billion for 2019, $1.6 billion for 2020, $1.7 billion for 2021, and $1.4 billion for 2022. The construction program includes capital expenditures related to contractual purchase commitments for nuclear fuel and capital expenditures covered under long-term service agreements. Estimated capital expenditures to comply with environmental laws and regulations included in these amounts are $581 million for 2018, $110 million for 2019, $163 million for 2020, $258 million for 2021, and $268 million for 2022. These estimated expenditures do not include any potential compliance costs associated with the regulation of CO2 emissions from fossil fuel-fired electric generating units. See FUTURE EARNINGS POTENTIAL – "Environmental Matters – Environmental Laws and Regulations" and "– Global Climate Issues" herein for additional information.
The Company also anticipates costs associated with closure in place and monitoring of ash ponds in accordance with the CCR Rule, which are reflected in the Company's ARO liabilities. These costs, which could change as the Company continues to refine its assumptions underlying the cost estimates and evaluate the method and timing of compliance activities, are estimated to be $0.3 million for 2018, $111 million for 2019, $90 million for 2020, $94 million for 2021, and $96 million for 2022. See Note 1 to the financial statements under "Asset Retirement Obligations and Other Costs of Removal" for additional information. Costs associated with the CCR Rule are expected to be recovered through Rate CNP Compliance.
The construction program is subject to periodic review and revision, and actual construction costs may vary from these estimates because of numerous factors. These factors include: changes in business conditions; changes in load projections; changes in environmental laws and regulations; the outcome of any legal challenges to the environmental rules; changes in generating plants, including unit retirements and replacements and adding or changing fuel sources at existing generating units, to meet regulatory requirements; changes in the expected environmental compliance program; changes in FERC rules and regulations; Alabama PSC approvals; changes in legislation; the cost and efficiency of construction labor, equipment, and materials; project scope and design changes; storm impacts; and the cost of capital. In addition, there can be no assurance that costs related to capital expenditures will be fully recovered.

MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS (continued)
Alabama Power Company 2017 Annual Report

As a result of NRC requirements, the Company has external trust funds for nuclear decommissioning costs; however, the Company currently has no additional funding requirements. For additional information, see Note 1 to the financial statements under "Nuclear Decommissioning."
In addition, as discussed in Note 2 to the financial statements, the Company provides postretirement benefits to substantially all employees and funds trusts to the extent required by the Alabama PSC and the FERC.
Other funding requirements related to obligations associated with scheduled maturities of long-term debt, as well as the related interest, derivative obligations, pension and other postretirement benefit plans, preferred stock dividends, leases, and other purchase commitments are detailed in the contractual obligations table that follows. See Notes 1, 2, 6, 7, and 11 to the financial statements for additional information.

MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS (continued)
Alabama Power Company 2017 Annual Report

Contractual Obligations
Contractual obligations at December 31, 2017 were as follows:
 2018 2019- 2020 2021- 2022 After 2022 Total
 (in millions)
Long-term debt(a) —
         
Principal$
 $450
 $1,060
 $6,176
 $7,686
Interest304
 598
 561
 4,408
 5,871
Preferred stock dividends(b)
15
 29
 29
 
 73
Financial derivative obligations(c)
6
 4
 
 
 10
Operating leases(d)
21
 40
 24
 20
 105
Capital Lease1
 1
 1
 2
 5
Purchase commitments —         
Capital(e)
2,053
 2,972
 2,914
 
 7,939
Fuel(f)
974
 1,197
 459
 238
 2,868
Purchased power(g)
78
 171
 186
 606
 1,041
Other(h)
47
 73
 59
 313
 492
Pension and other postretirement benefit plans(i)
19
 36
 
 
 55
Total$3,518
 $5,571
 $5,293
 $11,763
 $26,145
(a)All amounts are reflected based on final maturity dates. The Company plans to continue, when economically feasible, to retire higher-cost securities and replace these obligations with lower-cost capital if market conditions permit. Variable rate interest obligations are estimated based on rates as of December 31, 2017, as reflected in the statements of capitalization. Fixed rates include, where applicable, the effects of interest rate derivatives employed to manage interest rate risk. Long-term debt excludes capital lease amounts (shown separately).
(b)Preferred stock does not mature; therefore, amounts are provided for the next five years only.
(c)Includes derivative liabilities related to cash flow hedges of forecasted debt, as well as energy-related derivatives. For additional information, see Notes 1 and 11 to the financial statements.
(d)Excludes PPAs that are accounted for as leases and are included in purchased power.
(e)The Company provides estimated capital expenditures for a five-year period, including capital expenditures associated with environmental regulations. These amounts exclude contractual purchase commitments for nuclear fuel and capital expenditures covered under long-term service agreements which are reflected in "Fuel" and "Other," respectively. At December 31, 2017, purchase commitments were outstanding in connection with the construction program. See FUTURE EARNINGS POTENTIAL – "Environmental Matters – Environmental Laws and Regulations" herein for additional information.
(f)Includes commitments to purchase coal, nuclear fuel, and natural gas, as well as the related transportation and storage. In most cases, these contracts contain provisions for price escalation, minimum purchase levels, and other financial commitments. Natural gas purchase commitments are based on various indices at the time of delivery. Amounts reflected for natural gas purchase commitments have been estimated based on the New York Mercantile Exchange future prices at December 31, 2017.
(g)Estimated minimum long-term obligations for various long-term commitments for the purchase of capacity and energy.
(h)Includes long-term service agreements and contracts for the procurement of limestone. Long-term service agreements include price escalation based on inflation indices.
(i)The Company forecasts contributions to the pension and other postretirement benefit plans over a three-year period. The Company anticipates no mandatory contributions to the qualified pension plan during the next three years. Amounts presented represent estimated benefit payments for the nonqualified pension plans, estimated non-trust benefit payments for the other postretirement benefit plans, and estimated contributions to the other postretirement benefit plan trusts, all of which will be made from the Company's corporate assets. See Note 2 to the financial statements for additional information related to the pension and other postretirement benefit plans, including estimated benefit payments. Certain benefit payments will be made through the related benefit plans. Other benefit payments will be made from the Company's corporate assets.

MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS (continued)
Alabama Power Company 2017 Annual Report

Cautionary Statement Regarding Forward-Looking Statements
The Company's 2017 Annual Report contains forward-looking statements. Forward-looking statements include, among other things, statements concerning regulated rates, customer and sales growth, economic conditions, fuel and environmental cost recovery and other rate actions, current and proposed environmental regulations and related compliance plans and estimated expenditures, pending or potential litigation matters, access to sources of capital, projections for the qualified pension plan, postretirement benefit plans, and nuclear decommissioning trust fund contributions, financing activities, filings with state and federal regulatory authorities, impacts of the Tax Reform Legislation, federal income tax benefits, estimated sales and purchases under power sale and purchase agreements, and estimated construction and other plans and expenditures. In some cases, forward-looking statements can be identified by terminology such as "may," "will," "could," "should," "expects," "plans," "anticipates," "believes," "estimates," "projects," "predicts," "potential," or "continue" or the negative of these terms or other similar terminology. There are various factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from those suggested by the forward-looking statements; accordingly, there can be no assurance that such indicated results will be realized. These factors include:
the impact of recent and future federal and state regulatory changes, including environmental laws and regulations governing air, water, land, and protection of other natural resources, and also changes in tax and other laws and regulations to which the Company is subject, as well as changes in application of existing laws and regulations;
the uncertainty surrounding the recently enacted Tax Reform Legislation, including implementing regulations and IRS interpretations, actions that may be taken in response by regulatory authorities, and its impact, if any, on the credit ratings of the Company;
current and future litigation or regulatory investigations, proceedings, or inquiries;
the effects, extent, and timing of the entry of additional competition in the markets in which the Company operates;
variations in demand for electricity, including those relating to weather, the general economy, population and business growth (and declines), the effects of energy conservation and efficiency measures, including from the development and deployment of alternative energy sources such as self-generation and distributed generation technologies, and any potential economic impacts resulting from federal fiscal decisions;
available sources and costs of fuels;
effects of inflation;
the ability to control costs and avoid cost overruns during the development and construction of facilities, to construct facilities in accordance with the requirements of permits and licenses, and to satisfy any environmental performance standards;
investment performance of the Company's employee and retiree benefit plans and nuclear decommissioning trust funds;
advances in technology;
state and federal rate regulations and the impact of pending and future rate cases and negotiations, including rate actions relating to fuel and other cost recovery mechanisms;
the inherent risks involved in operating nuclear generating facilities, including environmental, health, regulatory, natural disaster, terrorism, and financial risks;
the ability to successfully operate generating, transmission, and distribution facilities and the successful performance of necessary corporate functions;
internal restructuring or other restructuring options that may be pursued;
potential business strategies, including acquisitions or dispositions of assets or businesses, which cannot be assured to be completed or beneficial to the Company;
the ability of counterparties of the Company to make payments as and when due and to perform as required;
the ability to obtain new short- and long-term contracts with wholesale customers;
the direct or indirect effect on the Company's business resulting from cyber intrusion or physical attack and the threat of physical attacks;
interest rate fluctuations and financial market conditions and the results of financing efforts;
changes in the Company's credit ratings, including impacts on interest rates, access to capital markets, and collateral requirements;
the impacts of any sovereign financial issues, including impacts on interest rates, access to capital markets, impacts on foreign currency exchange rates, counterparty performance, and the economy in general;

MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS (continued)
Alabama Power Company 2017 Annual Report

the ability of the Company to obtain additional generating capacity (or sell excess generating capacity) at competitive prices;
catastrophic events such as fires, earthquakes, explosions, floods, tornadoes, hurricanes and other storms, droughts, pandemic health events such as influenzas, or other similar occurrences;
the direct or indirect effects on the Company's business resulting from incidents affecting the U.S. electric grid or operation of generating resources;
the effect of accounting pronouncements issued periodically by standard-setting bodies; and
other factors discussed elsewhere herein and in other reports filed by the Company from time to time with the SEC.
The Company expressly disclaims any obligation to update any forward-looking statements.

STATEMENTS OF INCOME
For the Years Ended December 31, 2017, 2016, and 2015
Alabama Power Company 2017 Annual Report
 2017
 2016
 2015
 (in millions)
Operating Revenues:     
Retail revenues$5,458
 $5,322
 $5,234
Wholesale revenues, non-affiliates276
 283
 241
Wholesale revenues, affiliates97
 69
 84
Other revenues208
 215
 209
Total operating revenues6,039
 5,889
 5,768
Operating Expenses:     
Fuel1,225
 1,297
 1,342
Purchased power, non-affiliates170
 166
 171
Purchased power, affiliates158
 168
 180
Other operations and maintenance1,652
 1,510
 1,501
Depreciation and amortization736
 703
 643
Taxes other than income taxes384
 380
 368
Total operating expenses4,325
 4,224
 4,205
Operating Income1,714
 1,665
 1,563
Other Income and (Expense):     
Allowance for equity funds used during construction39
 28
 60
Interest expense, net of amounts capitalized(305) (302) (274)
Other income (expense), net(14) (21) (32)
Total other income and (expense)(280) (295) (246)
Earnings Before Income Taxes1,434
 1,370
 1,317
Income taxes568
 531
 506
Net Income866
 839
 811
Dividends on Preferred and Preference Stock18
 17
 26
Net Income After Dividends on Preferred and Preference Stock$848
 $822
 $785
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.


STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME
For the Years Ended December 31, 2017, 2016, and 2015
Alabama Power Company 2017 Annual Report
 2017
 2016
 2015
 (in millions)
Net Income$866
 $839
 $811
Other comprehensive income (loss):     
Qualifying hedges:     
Changes in fair value, net of tax of $(1), $(1), and $(3), respectively1
 (2) (5)
Reclassification adjustment for amounts included in net income,
net of tax of $2, $2, and $1, respectively
3
 4
 2
Total other comprehensive income (loss)4
 2
 (3)
Comprehensive Income$870
 $841
 $808
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
For the Years Ended December 31, 2017, 2016, and 2015
Alabama Power Company 2017 Annual Report
 2017
 2016
 2015
 (in millions)
Operating Activities:     
Net income$866
 $839
 $811
Adjustments to reconcile net income
to net cash provided from operating activities —
     
Depreciation and amortization, total888
 844
 780
Deferred income taxes409
 407
 388
Allowance for equity funds used during construction(39) (28) (60)
Pension and postretirement funding(2) (133) 
Other, net(14) (102) 15
Changes in certain current assets and liabilities —     
-Receivables(168) 94
 (160)
-Other current assets(16) 1
 40
-Accounts payable71
 73
 3
-Accrued taxes(84) 93
 138
-Retail fuel cost over recovery(76) (162) 191
-Other current liabilities2
 23
 (4)
Net cash provided from operating activities1,837
 1,949
 2,142
Investing Activities:     
Property additions(1,882) (1,272) (1,367)
Nuclear decommissioning trust fund purchases(237) (352) (439)
Nuclear decommissioning trust fund sales237
 351
 438
Cost of removal net of salvage(112) (94) (71)
Change in construction payables161
 (37) (15)
Other investing activities(43) (34) (34)
Net cash used for investing activities(1,876) (1,438) (1,488)
Financing Activities:     
Increase in notes payable, net3
 
 
Proceeds —     
Senior notes1,100
 400
 975
Preferred stock250
 
 
Pollution control revenue bonds
 
 80
Other long-term debt
 45
 
Capital contributions from parent company361
 260
 22
Redemptions and repurchases —     
Senior notes(525) (200) (650)
Preferred and preference stock(238) 
 (412)
Pollution control revenue bonds(36) 
 (134)
Payment of common stock dividends(714) (765) (571)
Other financing activities(38) (25) (43)
Net cash provided from (used for) financing activities163
 (285) (733)
Net Change in Cash and Cash Equivalents124
 226
 (79)
Cash and Cash Equivalents at Beginning of Year420
 194
 273
Cash and Cash Equivalents at End of Year$544
 $420
 $194
Supplemental Cash Flow Information:     
Cash paid (received) during the period for —     
Interest (net of $15, $11, and $22 capitalized, respectively)$285
 $277
 $250
Income taxes (net of refunds)236
 (108) 121
Noncash transactions — Accrued property additions at year-end245
 84
 121
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

BALANCE SHEETS
At December 31, 2017 and 2016
Alabama Power Company 2017 Annual Report
Assets2017
 2016
 (in millions)
Current Assets:   
Cash and cash equivalents$544
 $420
Receivables —   
Customer accounts receivable355
 348
Unbilled revenues162
 146
Affiliated43
 40
Other accounts and notes receivable55
 27
Accumulated provision for uncollectible accounts(9) (10)
Fossil fuel stock184
 205
Materials and supplies458
 435
Other regulatory assets, current124
 149
Other current assets90
 45
Total current assets2,006
 1,805
Property, Plant, and Equipment:   
In service27,326
 26,031
Less: Accumulated provision for depreciation9,563
 9,112
Plant in service, net of depreciation17,763
 16,919
Nuclear fuel, at amortized cost339
 336
Construction work in progress908
 491
Total property, plant, and equipment19,010
 17,746
Other Property and Investments:   
Equity investments in unconsolidated subsidiaries67
 66
Nuclear decommissioning trusts, at fair value903
 792
Miscellaneous property and investments124
 112
Total other property and investments1,094
 970
Deferred Charges and Other Assets:   
Deferred charges related to income taxes239
 525
Deferred under recovered regulatory clause revenues54
 150
Other regulatory assets, deferred1,272
 1,157
Other deferred charges and assets189
 163
Total deferred charges and other assets1,754
 1,995
Total Assets$23,864
 $22,516
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.


BALANCE SHEETS
At December 31, 2017 and 2016
Alabama Power Company 2017 Annual Report
Liabilities and Stockholder's Equity2017
 2016
 (in millions)
Current Liabilities:   
Securities due within one year$
 $561
Accounts payable —   
Affiliated327
 297
Other585
 433
Customer deposits92
 88
Accrued taxes —   
Accrued income taxes9
 45
Other accrued taxes45
 42
Accrued interest77
 78
Accrued compensation205
 193
Other regulatory liabilities, current1
 85
Other current liabilities59
 76
Total current liabilities1,400
 1,898
Long-Term Debt (See accompanying statements)
7,628
 6,535
Deferred Credits and Other Liabilities:   
Accumulated deferred income taxes2,760
 4,654
Deferred credits related to income taxes2,082
 65
Accumulated deferred ITCs112
 110
Employee benefit obligations304
 300
Asset retirement obligations1,702
 1,503
Other cost of removal obligations609
 684
Other regulatory liabilities, deferred84
 100
Other deferred credits and liabilities63
 63
Total deferred credits and other liabilities7,716
 7,479
Total Liabilities16,744
 15,912
Redeemable Preferred Stock (See accompanying statements)
291
 85
Preference Stock (See accompanying statements)

 196
Common Stockholder's Equity (See accompanying statements)
6,829
 6,323
Total Liabilities and Stockholder's Equity$23,864
 $22,516
Commitments and Contingent Matters (See notes)

 
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.


STATEMENTS OF CAPITALIZATION
At December 31, 2017 and 2016
Alabama Power Company 2017 Annual Report
 2017
 2016
 2017
 2016
 (in millions) (percent of total)
Long-Term Debt:       
Long-term debt payable to affiliated trusts —       
Variable rate (4.44% at 12/31/17) due 2042$206
 $206
    
Long-term notes payable —       
5.50% to 5.55% due 2017
 525
    
5.125% due 2019200
 200
    
3.375% due 2020250
 250
    
2.38% to 3.95% due 2021220
 220
    
2.45% to 5.875% due 2022750
 200
    
2.80% to 6.125% due 2023-20474,975
 4,425
    
Variable rates (2.55% to 2.786% at 12/31/17) due 202125
 25
    
Total long-term notes payable6,420
 5,845
    
Other long-term debt —       
Pollution control revenue bonds —       
1.625% to 1.85% due 2034207
 207
    
Variable rates (0.77% to 0.79% at 1/1/17) due 2017
 36
    
Variable rates (1.86% to 1.87% at 12/31/17) due 202165
 65
    
Variable rates (1.70% to 1.87% at 12/31/17) due 2024-2038788
 788
    
Total other long-term debt1,060
 1,096
    
Capitalized lease obligations4
 4
    
Unamortized debt premium (discount), net(11) (9)    
Unamortized debt issuance expense(51) (46)    
Total long-term debt (annual interest requirement — $305 million)7,628
 7,096
    
Less amount due within one year
 561
    
Long-term debt excluding amount due within one year7,628
 6,535
 51.7% 49.7%
Redeemable Preferred Stock:       
Cumulative redeemable preferred stock       
$100 par or stated value — 4.20% to 4.92%       
Authorized — 3,850,000 shares       
Outstanding — 475,115 shares48
 48
    
$1 par value —       
Authorized — 27,500,000 shares       
Outstanding — 2017: 5.00% — 10,000,000 shares: $25 stated value       
  — 2016: 5.83% — 1,520,000 shares: $25 stated value       
(annual dividend requirement — $15 million)243
 37
    
Total redeemable preferred stock291
 85
 2.0
 0.7
Preference Stock:       
$1 par value — 6.45% to 6.50%       
Authorized — 40,000,000 shares       
Outstanding — 2017: no shares       
 — 2016: 8,000,000 shares (non-cumulative): $25 stated value
 196
  1.5
Common Stockholder's Equity:       
Common stock, par value $40 per share —       
Authorized — 40,000,000 shares       
Outstanding — 30,537,500 shares1,222
 1,222
    
Paid-in capital2,986
 2,613
    
Retained earnings2,647
 2,518
    
Accumulated other comprehensive loss(26) (30)    
Total common stockholder's equity6,829
 6,323
 46.3
 48.1
Total Capitalization$14,748
 $13,139
 100.0% 100.0%
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.


STATEMENTS OF COMMON STOCKHOLDER'S EQUITY
For the Years Ended December 31, 2017, 2016, and 2015
Alabama Power Company 2017 Annual Report
 
Number of
Common
Shares
Issued
 
Common
Stock
 
Paid-In
Capital
 
Retained
Earnings
 
Accumulated
Other
Comprehensive
Income (Loss)
 Total
 (in millions)
Balance at December 31, 201431
 $1,222
 $2,304
 $2,255
 $(29) $5,752
Net income after dividends on preferred
and preference stock

 
 
 785
 
 785
Capital contributions from parent company
 
 37
 
 
 37
Other comprehensive income (loss)
 
 
 
 (3) (3)
Cash dividends on common stock
 
 
 (571) 
 (571)
Other
 
 
 (8) 
 (8)
Balance at December 31, 201531
 1,222
 2,341
 2,461
 (32) 5,992
Net income after dividends on preferred
and preference stock

 
 
 822
 
 822
Capital contributions from parent company
 
 272
 
 
 272
Other comprehensive income (loss)
 
 
 
 2
 2
Cash dividends on common stock
 
 
 (765) 
 (765)
Balance at December 31, 201631
 1,222
 2,613
 2,518
 (30) 6,323
Net income after dividends on preferred
and preference stock

 
 
 848
 
 848
Capital contributions from parent company
 
 373
 
 
 373
Other comprehensive income (loss)
 
 
 
 4
 4
Cash dividends on common stock
 
 
 (714) 
 (714)
Other
 
 
 (5) 
 (5)
Balance at December 31, 201731
 $1,222
 $2,986
 $2,647
 $(26) $6,829
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.


NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Alabama Power Company 2017 Annual Report




Index to the Notes to Financial Statements



NOTES (continued)
Alabama Power Company 2017 Annual Report

1. SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES
General
Alabama Power Company (the Company) is a wholly-owned subsidiary of Southern Company, which is the parent company of the Company and three other traditional electric operating companies, Southern Power, Southern Company Gas (as of July 1, 2016), SCS, Southern Linc, Southern Company Holdings, Inc. (Southern Holdings), Southern Nuclear, PowerSecure, Inc. (PowerSecure) (as of May 9, 2016), and other direct and indirect subsidiaries. The traditional electric operating companies – the Company, Georgia Power, Gulf Power, and Mississippi Power – are vertically integrated utilities providing electric service in four Southeastern states. The Company provides electric service to retail and wholesale customers within its traditional service territory located in the State of Alabama in addition to wholesale customers in the Southeast. Southern Power develops, constructs, acquires, owns, and manages power generation assets, including renewable energy projects, and sells electricity at market-based rates in the wholesale market. Southern Company Gas distributes natural gas through utilities in seven states and is involved in several other complementary businesses including gas marketing services, wholesale gas services, and gas midstream operations. SCS, the system service company, provides, at cost, specialized services to Southern Company and its subsidiary companies. Southern Linc provides digital wireless communications for use by Southern Company and its subsidiary companies and also markets these services to the public and provides fiber optics services within the Southeast. Southern Holdings is an intermediate holding company subsidiary, primarily for Southern Company's investments in leveraged leases and for other electric services. Southern Nuclear operates and provides services to the Southern Company system's nuclear power plants, including the Company's Plant Farley. PowerSecure is a provider of products and services in the areas of distributed generation, energy efficiency, and utility infrastructure.
The equity method is used for subsidiaries in which the Company has significant influence but does not control and for variable interest entities (VIEs) where the Company has an equity investment, but is not the primary beneficiary.
The Company is subject to regulation by the FERC and the Alabama PSC. As such, the Company's financial statements reflect the effects of rate regulation in accordance with GAAP and comply with the accounting policies and practices prescribed by its regulatory commissions. The preparation of financial statements in conformity with GAAP requires the use of estimates, and the actual results may differ from those estimates. Certain prior years' data presented in the financial statements have been reclassified to conform to the current year presentation.
Recently Issued Accounting Standards
Revenue
In 2014, the FASB issued ASC 606, Revenue from Contracts with Customers (ASC 606), replacing the existing accounting standard and industry specific guidance for revenue recognition with a five-step model for recognizing and measuring revenue from contracts with customers. The underlying principle of the new standard is to recognize revenue to depict the transfer of goods or services to customers at the amount expected to be collected. The new standard also requires enhanced disclosures regarding the nature, amount, timing, and uncertainty of revenue and the related cash flows arising from contracts with customers.
Most of the Company's revenue, including energy provided to customers, is from tariff offerings that provide electricity without a defined contractual term, as well as longer-term contractual commitments, including PPAs.
The Company has completed the evaluation of all revenue streams and determined that the adoption of ASC 606 will not change the current timing of revenue recognition for such transactions. Some revenue arrangements, such as energy-related derivatives, are excluded from the scope of ASC 606 and, therefore, will be accounted for and disclosed separately from revenues under ASC 606. The Company has concluded contributions in aid of construction are not in scope for ASC 606 and will continue to be accounted for as an offset to property, plant, and equipment.
The new standard is effective for reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2017. The Company applied the modified retrospective method of adoption effective January 1, 2018. The Company also utilized practical expedients which allowed it to apply the standard to open contracts at the date of adoption and to reflect the aggregate effect of all modifications when identifying performance obligations and allocating the transaction price for contracts modified before the effective date. Under the modified retrospective method of adoption, prior year reported results are not restated; however, a cumulative-effect adjustment to retained earnings at January 1, 2018 is recorded. In addition, quarterly disclosures will include comparative information on 2018 financial statement line items under current guidance. The adoption of ASC 606 did not result in a cumulative-effect adjustment.

NOTES (continued)
Alabama Power Company 2017 Annual Report

Leases
In February 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-02, Leases (Topic 842) (ASU 2016-02). ASU 2016-02 requires lessees to recognize on the balance sheet a lease liability and a right-of-use asset for all leases. ASU 2016-02 also changes the recognition, measurement, and presentation of expense associated with leases and provides clarification regarding the identification of certain components of contracts that would represent a lease. The accounting required by lessors is relatively unchanged. ASU 2016-02 is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2018 and the Company will adopt the new standard effective January 1, 2019.
The Company is currently implementing an information technology system along with the related changes to internal controls and accounting policies that will support the accounting for leases under ASU 2016-02. In addition, the Company has substantially completed a detailed inventory and analysis of its leases. In terms of rental charges and duration of contracts, the most significant leases relate to cellular towers, railcars, and a PPA where the Company is the lessee and outdoor lighting and to land where the Company is the lessor. The Company is currently analyzing pole attachment agreements and a lease determination has not been made at this time. While the Company has not yet determined the ultimate impact, adoption of ASU 2016-02 is expected to have a significant impact on the Company's balance sheet.
Other
In March 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-09, Compensation-Stock Compensation (Topic 718): Improvements to Employee Share-Based Payment Accounting (ASU 2016-09). ASU 2016-09 changes the accounting for income taxes and the cash flow presentation for share-based payment award transactions effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2016. The new guidance requires all excess tax benefits and deficiencies related to the exercise or vesting of stock compensation to be recognized as income tax expense or benefit in the income statement. Previously, the Company recognized any excess tax benefits and deficiencies related to the exercise and vesting of stock compensation as additional paid-in capital. In addition, the new guidance requires excess tax benefits for share-based payments to be included in net cash provided from operating activities rather than net cash provided from financing activities on the statement of cash flows. The Company elected to adopt the guidance in 2016 and reflect the related adjustments as of January 1, 2016. Prior year's data presented in the financial statements has not been adjusted. The Company also elected to recognize forfeitures as they occur. The new guidance did not have a material impact on the results of operations, financial position, or cash flows of the Company. See Notes 5 and 8 for disclosures impacted by ASU 2016-09.
On March 10, 2017, the FASB issued ASU No. 2017-07, Compensation – Retirement Benefits (Topic 715): Improving the Presentation of Net Periodic Pension Cost and Net Periodic Postretirement Benefit Cost (ASU 2017-07). ASU 2017-07 requires that an employer report the service cost component in the same line item or items as other compensation costs and requires the other components of net periodic pension and postretirement benefit costs to be separately presented in the income statement outside of income from operations. Additionally, only the service cost component is eligible for capitalization, when applicable. However, all cost components remain eligible for capitalization under FERC regulations. ASU 2017-07 will be applied retrospectively for the presentation of the service cost component and the other components of net periodic pension and postretirement benefit costs in the income statement. The capitalization of only the service cost component of net periodic pension and postretirement benefit costs in assets will be applied on a prospective basis. ASU 2017-07 is effective for periods beginning after December 15, 2017. The presentation changes required for net periodic pension and postretirement benefit costs will result in a decrease in the Company's operating income and an increase in other income for 2016 and 2017 and are expected to result in a decrease in operating income and an increase in other income for 2018. The Company adopted ASU 2017-07 effective January 1, 2018 with no material impact on its financial statements.
On August 28, 2017, the FASB issued ASU No. 2017-12, Derivatives and Hedging (Topic 815): Targeted Improvements to Accounting for Hedging Activities (ASU 2017-12), amending the hedge accounting recognition and presentation requirements. ASU 2017-12 makes more financial and non-financial hedging strategies eligible for hedge accounting, amends the related presentation and disclosure requirements, and simplifies hedge effectiveness assessment requirements. ASU 2017-12 is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2018, with early adoption permitted. The Company adopted ASU 2017-12 effective January 1, 2018 with no material impact on its financial statements.
Affiliate Transactions
The Company has an agreement with SCS under which the following services are rendered to the Company at direct or allocated cost: general and design engineering, operations, purchasing, accounting, finance and treasury, tax, information technology, marketing, auditing, insurance and pension administration, human resources, systems and procedures, digital wireless communications, and other services with respect to business and operations, construction management, and power pool transactions. Costs for these services amounted to $479 million, $460 million, and $438 million during 2017, 2016, and 2015, respectively. Cost allocation methodologies used by SCS prior to the repeal of the Public Utility Holding Company Act of 1935,

NOTES (continued)
Alabama Power Company 2017 Annual Report

as amended, were approved by the SEC. Subsequently, additional cost allocation methodologies have been reported to the FERC and management believes they are reasonable. The FERC permits services to be rendered at cost by system service companies. See Note 7 under "Operating Leases" for information on leases of cellular tower space for the Company's digital wireless communications equipment.
The Company has an agreement with Southern Nuclear under which the following nuclear-related services are rendered to the Company at cost: general executive and advisory services, general operations, management and technical services, administrative services including procurement, accounting, employee relations, systems and procedures services, strategic planning and budgeting services, and other services with respect to business and operations. Costs for these services amounted to $248 million, $249 million, and $243 million during 2017, 2016, and 2015, respectively.
The Company jointly owns Plant Greene County with Mississippi Power. The Company has an agreement with Mississippi Power under which the Company operates Plant Greene County, and Mississippi Power reimburses the Company for its proportionate share of non-fuel expenses, which totaled $9 million in 2017, $13 million in 2016, and $11 million in 2015. Mississippi Power also reimbursed the Company for any direct fuel purchases delivered from one of the Company's transfer facilities. There were no such fuel purchases in 2017 and 2016 and $8 million in 2015. See Note 4 for additional information.
The Company has an agreement with Gulf Power under which the Company made transmission system upgrades to ensure firm delivery of energy under a non-affiliate PPA from a combined cycle plant located in Autauga County, Alabama. Under a related tariff, the Company received $11 million in 2017, $12 million in 2016, and $14 million in 2015 and expects to recover a total of approximately $61 million from 2018 through 2023 from Gulf Power.
In September 2016, Southern Company Gas acquired a 50% equity interest in Southern Natural Gas Company, L.L.C. (SNG). Prior to completion of the acquisition, SCS, as agent for the Company, had entered into a long-term interstate natural gas transportation agreement with SNG. The interstate transportation service provided to the Company by SNG pursuant to this agreement is governed by the terms and conditions of SNG's natural gas tariff and is subject to FERC regulation. Transportation costs under this agreement were approximately $9 million in 2017 and $2 million for the period subsequent to Southern Company Gas' investment in SNG through December 31, 2016.
The Company has agreements with PowerSecure for services related to utility infrastructure construction, distributed energy, and energy efficiency projects. Costs for these services amounted to approximately $11 million for 2017 and were immaterial for 2016.
The Company provides incidental services to and receives such services from other Southern Company subsidiaries which are generally minor in duration and amount. Except as described herein, the Company neither provided nor received any material services to or from affiliates in 2017, 2016, or 2015.
Also, see Note 4 for information regarding the Company's ownership in a PPA and a gas pipeline ownership agreement with SEGCO.
The traditional electric operating companies, including the Company and Southern Power, may jointly enter into various types of wholesale energy, natural gas, and certain other contracts, either directly or through SCS as agent. Each participating company may be jointly and severally liable for the obligations incurred under these agreements. See Note 7 under "Fuel and Purchased Power Agreements" for additional information.

NOTES (continued)
Alabama Power Company 2017 Annual Report

Regulatory Assets and Liabilities
The Company is subject to accounting requirements for the effects of rate regulation. Regulatory assets represent probable future revenues associated with certain costs that are expected to be recovered from customers through the ratemaking process. Regulatory liabilities represent probable future reductions in revenues associated with amounts that are expected to be credited to customers through the ratemaking process.
Regulatory assets and (liabilities) reflected in the balance sheets at December 31 relate to:
 2017 2016 Note
 (in millions)  
Retiree benefit plans$946
 $947
 (i,j)
Deferred income tax charges240
 526
 (a,k,n)
Regulatory clauses142
 
 (m)
Vacation pay70
 69
 (c,j)
Loss on reacquired debt62
 68
 (b)
Nuclear outage56
 70
 (d)
Remaining net book value of retired assets54
 69
 (l)
Under/(over) recovered regulatory clause revenues53
 76
 (d)
Other regulatory assets51
 50
 (f)
Fuel-hedging losses7
 1
 (e,j)
Deferred income tax credits(2,082) (65) (a,n)
Other cost of removal obligations(609) (684) (a)
Natural disaster reserve(38) (69) (h)
Asset retirement obligations(33) 12
 (a)
Other regulatory liabilities(7) (23) (e,g)
Total regulatory assets (liabilities), net$(1,088) $1,047
  
Note: The recovery and amortization periods for these regulatory assets and (liabilities) are as follows:
(a)Asset retirement and removal assets and liabilities are recorded, deferred income tax assets are recovered, and deferred income tax credits are amortized over the related property lives, which may range up to 50 years. Asset retirement and other cost of removal assets and liabilities will be settled and trued up following completion of the related activities.
(b)Recovered over the remaining life of the original issue, which may range up to 50 years.
(c)Recorded as earned by employees and recovered as paid, generally within one year. This includes both vacation and banked holiday pay.
(d)Recorded and recovered or amortized as approved or accepted by the Alabama PSC over periods not exceeding 10 years. See Note 3 under "Retail Regulatory Matters" for additional information.
(e)Fuel-hedging assets and liabilities are recorded over the life of the underlying hedged purchase contracts, which generally do not exceed three and a half years. Upon final settlement, actual costs incurred are recovered through the energy cost recovery clause.
(f)Comprised of components including generation site selection/evaluation costs, PPA capacity (to be recovered over the next 12 months), and other miscellaneous assets. Recorded as accepted by the Alabama PSC. Capitalized upon initialization of related construction projects, if applicable.
(g)Comprised of components including mine reclamation and remediation liabilities and fuel-hedging gains. Recorded as accepted by the Alabama PSC. Mine reclamation and remediation liabilities will be settled following completion of the related activities.
(h)Utilized as storm restoration and potential reliability-related expenses are incurred, as approved by the Alabama PSC.
(i)Recovered and amortized over the average remaining service period which may range up to 15 years. See Note 2 for additional information.
(j)Not earning a return as offset in rate base by a corresponding asset or liability.
(k)Included in the deferred income tax charges are $13 million for 2017 and $16 million for 2016 for the retiree Medicare drug subsidy, which is recovered and amortized, as approved by the Alabama PSC, over the average remaining service period which may range up to 15 years.
(l)Recorded and amortized as approved by the Alabama PSC for a period up to 11 years.
(m)Established per an order from the Alabama PSC issued on February 17, 2017 and will be amortized concurrently with the effective date of the Company's next depreciation study. See Note 3 under "Retail Regulatory Matters – Rate RSE" for additional information.
(n)As a result of the Tax Reform Legislation, these accounts include certain deferred income tax assets and liabilities not subject to normalization. The recovery and amortization of these amounts will be established consistent with guidance provided by the Alabama PSC. See Note 5 for additional information.
In the event that a portion of the Company's operations is no longer subject to applicable accounting rules for rate regulation, the Company would be required to write off to income or reclassify to accumulated OCI related regulatory assets and liabilities that

NOTES (continued)
Alabama Power Company 2017 Annual Report

are not specifically recoverable through regulated rates. In addition, the Company would be required to determine if any impairment to other assets, including plant, exists and write down the assets, if impaired, to their fair values. All regulatory assets and liabilities are to be reflected in rates. See Note 3 under "Retail Regulatory Matters" for additional information.
Revenues
Wholesale capacity revenues from PPAs are recognized either on a levelized basis over the appropriate contract period or the amount billable under the contract terms. Energy and other revenues are recognized as services are provided. Unbilled revenues related to retail sales are accrued at the end of each fiscal period. Electric rates for the Company include provisions to adjust billings for fluctuations in fuel costs, fuel hedging, the energy component of purchased power costs, and certain other costs. Revenues are adjusted for differences between these actual costs and amounts billed in current regulated rates. Under or over recovered regulatory clause revenues are recorded in the balance sheets and are recovered or returned to customers through adjustments to the billing factors. The Company and the Alabama PSC continuously monitor the under/over recovered balances. The Company files for revised rates as required or when management deems appropriate, depending on the rate. See Note 3 under "Retail Regulatory Matters – Rate ECR" and "Retail Regulatory Matters – Rate CNP Compliance" for additional information.
The Company has a diversified base of customers. No single customer or industry comprises 10% or more of revenues. For all periods presented, uncollectible accounts averaged less than 1% of revenues.
Fuel Costs
Fuel costs are expensed as the fuel is used. Fuel expense generally includes fuel transportation costs and the cost of purchased emissions allowances as they are used. Fuel expense also includes the amortization of the cost of nuclear fuel.
Income and Other Taxes
The Company uses the liability method of accounting for deferred income taxes and provides deferred income taxes for all significant income tax temporary differences. Federal ITCs utilized are deferred and amortized to income over the average life of the related property. Taxes that are collected from customers on behalf of governmental agencies to be remitted to these agencies are presented net on the statements of income.
The Company recognizes tax positions that are "more likely than not" of being sustained upon examination by the appropriate taxing authorities. See Note 5 under "Unrecognized Tax Benefits" for additional information.
Property, Plant, and Equipment
Property, plant, and equipment is stated at original cost less any regulatory disallowances and impairments. Original cost includes: materials; labor; minor items of property; appropriate administrative and general costs; payroll-related costs such as taxes, pensions, and other benefits; and the interest capitalized and cost of equity funds used during construction.
The Company's property, plant, and equipment in service consisted of the following at December 31:
 2017 2016
 (in millions)
Generation$14,213
 $13,551
Transmission4,119
 3,921
Distribution7,034
 6,707
General1,948
 1,840
Plant acquisition adjustment12
 12
Total plant in service$27,326
 $26,031
The cost of replacements of property, exclusive of minor items of property, is capitalized. The cost of maintenance, repairs, and replacement of minor items of property is charged to other operations and maintenance expenses as incurred or performed with the exception of nuclear refueling costs, which are recorded in accordance with specific Alabama PSC orders.
Nuclear Outage Accounting Order
In accordance with an Alabama PSC order, nuclear outage operations and maintenance expenses for the two units at Plant Farley are deferred to a regulatory asset when the charges actually occur and are then amortized over a subsequent 18-month period with

NOTES (continued)
Alabama Power Company 2017 Annual Report

the fall outage costs amortization beginning in January of the following year and the spring outage costs amortization beginning in July of the same year.
Depreciation and Amortization
Depreciation of the original cost of utility plant in service is provided primarily by using composite straight-line rates, which approximated 2.9% in 2017, 3% in 2016, and 2.9% in 2015. Depreciation studies are conducted periodically to update the composite rates and the information is provided to the Alabama PSC and approved by the FERC. When property subject to composite depreciation is retired or otherwise disposed of in the normal course of business, its original cost, together with the cost of removal, less salvage, is charged to accumulated depreciation. For other property dispositions, the applicable cost and accumulated depreciation are removed from the balance sheet accounts, and a gain or loss is recognized. Minor items of property included in the original cost of the plant are retired when the related property unit is retired.
In 2016, the Company submitted an updated depreciation study to the FERC and received authorization to use the recommended rates beginning January 2017. The study was also provided to the Alabama PSC.
Asset Retirement Obligations and Other Costs of Removal
AROs are computed as the present value of the estimated ultimate costs for an asset's future retirement and are recorded in the period in which the liability is incurred. The costs are capitalized as part of the related long-lived asset and depreciated over the asset's useful life. In the absence of quoted market prices, AROs are estimated using present value techniques in which estimates of future cash outlays associated with the asset retirements are discounted using a credit-adjusted risk-free rate. Estimates of the timing and amounts of future cash outlays are based on projections of when and how the assets will be retired and the cost of future removal activities. The Company has received accounting guidance from the Alabama PSC allowing the continued accrual of other future retirement costs for long-lived assets that the Company does not have a legal obligation to retire. Accordingly, the accumulated removal costs for these obligations are reflected in the balance sheets as a regulatory liability.
The liability for AROs primarily relates to the decommissioning of the Company's nuclear facility, Plant Farley, and facilities that are subject to the Disposal of Coal Combustion Residuals from Electric Utilities final rule published by the EPA in 2015 (CCR Rule), principally ash ponds. In addition, the Company has retirement obligations related to various landfill sites, underground storage tanks, asbestos removal related to ongoing repair and maintenance, disposal of polychlorinated biphenyls in certain transformers, and disposal of sulfur hexafluoride gas in certain substation breakers. The Company also has identified retirement obligations related to certain transmission and distribution facilities, asbestos containing material within long-term assets not subject to ongoing repair and maintenance activities, and certain wireless communication towers. However, liabilities for the removal of these assets have not been recorded because the settlement timing for the retirement obligations related to these assets is indeterminable and, therefore, the fair value of the retirement obligations cannot be reasonably estimated. A liability for these AROs will be recognized when sufficient information becomes available to support a reasonable estimation of the ARO. The Company will continue to recognize in the statements of income allowed removal costs in accordance with its regulatory treatment. Any differences between costs recognized in accordance with accounting standards related to asset retirement and environmental obligations and those reflected in rates are recognized as either a regulatory asset or liability, as ordered by the Alabama PSC, and are reflected in the balance sheets. See "Nuclear Decommissioning" herein for additional information on amounts included in rates.
Details of the AROs included in the balance sheets are as follows:
 2017  2016 
 (in millions) 
Balance at beginning of year$1,533
  $1,448
 
Liabilities incurred
  5
 
Liabilities settled(26)  (25) 
Accretion77
  73
 
Cash flow revisions125
  32
 
Balance at end of year$1,709
  $1,533
 
The increase in liabilities incurred and cash flow revisions in 2017 is primarily due to updated cost estimates related to the closure of ash ponds and landfills. The increase in 2016 is primarily related to changes in ash pond closure strategy.

NOTES (continued)
Alabama Power Company 2017 Annual Report

The cost estimates for AROs related to the CCR Rule are based on information as of December 31, 2017 using various assumptions related to closure and post-closure costs, timing of future cash outlays, inflation and discount rates, and the potential methods for complying with the CCR Rule requirements for closure in place. As further analysis is performed and closure details are developed, the Company will continue to periodically update these cost estimates as necessary.
Nuclear Decommissioning
The NRC requires licensees of commercial nuclear power reactors to establish a plan for providing reasonable assurance of funds for future decommissioning. The Company has external trust funds (Funds) to comply with the NRC's regulations. Use of the Funds is restricted to nuclear decommissioning activities. The Funds are managed and invested in accordance with applicable requirements of various regulatory bodies, including the NRC, the FERC, and the Alabama PSC, as well as the IRS. While the Company is allowed to prescribe an overall investment policy to the Funds' managers, the Company and its affiliates are not allowed to engage in the day-to-day management of the Funds or to mandate individual investment decisions. Day-to-day management of the investments in the Funds is delegated to unrelated third party managers with oversight by the management of the Company. The Funds' managers are authorized, within certain investment guidelines, to actively buy and sell securities at their own discretion in order to maximize the return on the Funds' investments. The Funds are invested in a tax-efficient manner in a diversified mix of equity and fixed income securities and are reported as trading securities.
The Company records the investment securities held in the Funds at fair value, as disclosed in Note 10, as management believes that fair value best represents the nature of the Funds. Gains and losses, whether realized or unrealized, are recorded in the regulatory liability for AROs in the balance sheets and are not included in net income or OCI. Fair value adjustments and realized gains and losses are determined on a specific identification basis.
At December 31, 2017, investment securities in the Funds totaled $902 million, consisting of equity securities of $644 million, debt securities of $223 million, and $35 million of other securities. At December 31, 2016, investment securities in the Funds totaled $790 million, consisting of equity securities of $552 million, debt securities of $208 million, and $30 million of other securities. These amounts exclude receivables related to investment income and pending investment sales and payables related to pending investment purchases.
Sales of the securities held in the Funds resulted in cash proceeds of $237 million, $351 million, and $438 million in 2017, 2016, and 2015, respectively, all of which were reinvested. For 2017, fair value increases, including reinvested interest and dividends and excluding the Funds' expenses, were $125 million, which included $98 million related to unrealized gains on securities held in the Funds at December 31, 2017. For 2016, fair value increases, including reinvested interest and dividends and excluding the Funds' expenses, were $76 million, which included $34 million related to unrealized gains on securities held in the Funds at December 31, 2016. For 2015, fair value increases, including reinvested interest and dividends and excluding the Funds' expenses, were $8 million, which included $57 million related to unrealized losses on securities held in the Funds at December 31, 2015. While the investment securities held in the Funds are reported as trading securities, the Funds continue to be managed with a long-term focus. Accordingly, all purchases and sales within the Funds are presented separately in the statements of cash flows as investing cash flows, consistent with the nature of the securities and purpose for which the securities were acquired.
Amounts previously recorded in internal reserves are being transferred into the Funds through 2040 as approved by the Alabama PSC. The NRC's minimum external funding requirements are based on a generic estimate of the cost to decommission only the radioactive portions of a nuclear unit based on the size and type of reactor. The Company has filed a plan with the NRC designed to ensure that, over time, the deposits and earnings of the Funds will provide the minimum funding amounts prescribed by the NRC.
At December 31, the accumulated provisions for decommissioning were as follows:
 2017 2016
 (in millions)
External trust funds$902
 $790
Internal reserves18
 19
Total$920
 $809

NOTES (continued)
Alabama Power Company 2017 Annual Report

Site study cost is the estimate to decommission a facility as of the site study year. The estimated costs of decommissioning as of December 31, 2017 based on the most current study performed in 2013 for Plant Farley are as follows:
Decommissioning periods: 
Beginning year2037
Completion year2076
 (in millions)
Site study costs: 
Radiated structures$1,362
Non-radiated structures80
Total site study costs$1,442
The decommissioning cost estimates are based on prompt dismantlement and removal of the plant from service. The actual decommissioning costs may vary from the above estimates because of changes in the assumed date of decommissioning, changes in NRC requirements, or changes in the assumptions used in making these estimates.
For ratemaking purposes, the Company's decommissioning costs are based on the site study. Significant assumptions used to determine these costs for ratemaking were an inflation rate of 4.5% and a trust earnings rate of 7.0%. The next site study is expected to be completed in 2018.
Amounts previously contributed to the Funds are currently projected to be adequate to meet the decommissioning obligations. The Company will continue to provide site-specific estimates of the decommissioning costs and related projections of funds in the external trust to the Alabama PSC and, if necessary, would seek the Alabama PSC's approval to address any changes in a manner consistent with NRC and other applicable requirements.
Allowance for Funds Used During Construction
The Company records AFUDC, which represents the estimated debt and equity costs of capital funds that are necessary to finance the construction of new regulated facilities. While cash is not realized currently, AFUDC increases the revenue requirement and is recovered over the service life of the plant through a higher rate base and higher depreciation. The equity component of AFUDC is not included in calculating taxable income. All current construction costs are included in retail rates. The AFUDC composite rate as of December 31 was 8.3% in 2017, 8.4% in 2016, and 8.7% in 2015. AFUDC, net of income taxes, as a percentage of net income after dividends on preferred and preference stock was 5.7% in 2017, 4.2% in 2016, and 9.3% in 2015.
Impairment of Long-Lived Assets and Intangibles
The Company evaluates long-lived assets for impairment when events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying value of such assets may not be recoverable. The determination of whether an impairment has occurred is based on either a specific regulatory disallowance or an estimate of undiscounted future cash flows attributable to the assets, as compared with the carrying value of the assets. If an impairment has occurred, the amount of the impairment recognized is determined by either the amount of regulatory disallowance or by estimating the fair value of the assets and recording a loss if the carrying value is greater than the fair value. For assets identified as held for sale, the carrying value is compared to the estimated fair value less the cost to sell in order to determine if an impairment loss is required. Until the assets are disposed of, their estimated fair value is re-evaluated when circumstances or events change.
Cash and Cash Equivalents
For purposes of the financial statements, temporary cash investments are considered cash equivalents. Temporary cash investments are securities with original maturities of 90 days or less.
Materials and Supplies
Generally, materials and supplies include the average cost of transmission, distribution, and generating plant materials. Materials are charged to inventory when purchased and then expensed or capitalized to plant, as appropriate, at weighted average cost when installed.

NOTES (continued)
Alabama Power Company 2017 Annual Report

Fuel Inventory
Fuel inventory includes the average cost of coal, natural gas, oil, transportation, and emissions allowances. Fuel is recorded to inventory when purchased and then expensed, at weighted average cost, as used and recovered by the Company through energy cost recovery rates approved by the Alabama PSC. Emissions allowances granted by the EPA are included in inventory at zero cost.
Financial Instruments
The Company uses derivative financial instruments to limit exposure to fluctuations in interest rates, the prices of certain fuel purchases, and electricity purchases and sales. All derivative financial instruments are recognized as either assets or liabilities on the balance sheets (included in "Other") and are measured at fair value. See Note 10 for additional information regarding fair value. Substantially all of the Company's bulk energy purchases and sales contracts that meet the definition of a derivative are excluded from fair value accounting requirements because they qualify for the "normal" scope exception, and are accounted for under the accrual method. Derivative contracts that qualify as cash flow hedges of anticipated transactions or are recoverable through the Alabama PSC-approved fuel-hedging program result in the deferral of related gains and losses in OCI or regulatory assets and liabilities, respectively, until the hedged transactions occur. Any ineffectiveness arising from cash flow hedges is recognized currently in net income. Other derivative contracts that qualify as fair value hedges are marked to market through current period income and are recorded on a net basis in the statements of income. Cash flows from derivatives are classified on the statement of cash flows in the same category as the hedged item. See Note 11 for additional information regarding derivatives.
The Company offsets fair value amounts recognized for multiple derivative instruments executed with the same counterparty under a netting arrangement. Additionally, the Company had no outstanding collateral repayment obligations or rights to reclaim collateral arising from derivative instruments recognized at December 31, 2017.
The Company is exposed to potential losses related to financial instruments in the event of counterparties' nonperformance. The Company has established controls to determine and monitor the creditworthiness of counterparties in order to mitigate the Company's exposure to counterparty credit risk.
Comprehensive Income
The objective of comprehensive income is to report a measure of all changes in common stock equity of an enterprise that result from transactions and other economic events of the period other than transactions with owners. Comprehensive income consists of net income, changes in the fair value of qualifying cash flow hedges, and reclassifications for amounts included in net income.
Variable Interest Entities
The primary beneficiary of a VIE is required to consolidate the VIE when it has both the power to direct the activities of the VIE that most significantly impact the VIE's economic performance and the obligation to absorb losses or the right to receive benefits from the VIE that could potentially be significant to the VIE.
The Company has established a wholly-owned trust to issue preferred securities. See Note 6 under "Long-Term Debt Payable to an Affiliated Trust" for additional information. However, the Company is not considered the primary beneficiary of the trust. Therefore, the investment in the trust is reflected as other investments, and the related loan from the trust is reflected as long-term debt in the balance sheets.
2. RETIREMENT BENEFITS
The Company has a defined benefit, trusteed, pension plan covering substantially all employees. This qualified pension plan is funded in accordance with requirements of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974, as amended (ERISA). No contributions to the qualified pension plan were made for the year ended December 31, 2017 and no mandatory contributions to the qualified pension plan are anticipated for the year ending December 31, 2018. The Company also provides certain defined benefit pension plans for a selected group of management and highly compensated employees. Benefits under these non-qualified pension plans are funded on a cash basis. In addition, the Company provides certain medical care and life insurance benefits for retired employees through other postretirement benefit plans. The Company funds its other postretirement trusts to the extent required by the Alabama PSC and the FERC. For the year ending December 31, 2018, no other postretirement trusts contributions are expected.

NOTES (continued)
Alabama Power Company 2017 Annual Report

Actuarial Assumptions
The weighted average rates assumed in the actuarial calculations used to determine both the net periodic costs for the pension and other postretirement benefit plans for the following year and the benefit obligations as of the measurement date are presented below.
Assumptions used to determine net periodic costs:2017 2016 2015
Pension plans     
Discount rate – benefit obligations4.44% 4.67% 4.18%
Discount rate – interest costs3.76
 3.90
 4.18
Discount rate – service costs4.85
 5.07
 4.49
Expected long-term return on plan assets7.95
 8.20
 8.20
Annual salary increase4.46
 4.46
 3.59
Other postretirement benefit plans     
Discount rate – benefit obligations4.27% 4.51% 4.04%
Discount rate – interest costs3.58
 3.69
 4.04
Discount rate – service costs4.70
 4.96
 4.40
Expected long-term return on plan assets6.83
 6.83
 7.17
Annual salary increase4.46
 4.46
 3.59
Assumptions used to determine benefit obligations:2017 2016
Pension plans   
Discount rate3.81% 4.44%
Annual salary increase4.46
 4.46
Other postretirement benefit plans   
Discount rate3.71% 4.27%
Annual salary increase4.46
 4.46
The Company estimates the expected rate of return on pension plan and other postretirement benefit plan assets using a financial model to project the expected return on each current investment portfolio. The analysis projects an expected rate of return on each of eight different asset classes in order to arrive at the expected return on the entire portfolio relying on each trust's target asset allocation and reasonable capital market assumptions. The financial model is based on four key inputs: anticipated returns by asset class (based in part on historical returns), each trust's target asset allocation, an anticipated inflation rate, and the projected impact of a periodic rebalancing of each trust's portfolio.
An additional assumption used in measuring the accumulated other postretirement benefit obligations (APBO) was a weighted average medical care cost trend rate. The weighted average medical care cost trend rates used in measuring the APBO as of December 31, 2017 were as follows:
 Initial Cost Trend Rate Ultimate Cost Trend Rate Year That Ultimate Rate is Reached
Pre-656.50% 4.50% 2026
Post-65 medical5.00
 4.50
 2026
Post-65 prescription10.00
 4.50
 2026

NOTES (continued)
Alabama Power Company 2017 Annual Report

An annual increase or decrease in the assumed medical care cost trend rate of 1% would affect the APBO and the service and interest cost components at December 31, 2017 as follows:
 
1 Percent
Increase
 
1 Percent
Decrease
 (in millions)
Benefit obligation$30
 $26
Service and interest costs1
 1
Pension Plans
The total accumulated benefit obligation for the pension plans was $2.7 billion at December 31, 2017 and $2.4 billion at December 31, 2016. Changes in the projected benefit obligations and the fair value of plan assets during the plan years ended December 31, 2017 and 2016 were as follows:
 2017 2016
 (in millions)
Change in benefit obligation   
Benefit obligation at beginning of year$2,663
 $2,506
Service cost63
 57
Interest cost98
 95
Benefits paid(120) (109)
Actuarial (gain) loss294
 114
Balance at end of year2,998
 2,663
Change in plan assets   
Fair value of plan assets at beginning of year2,517
 2,279
Actual return (loss) on plan assets427
 206
Employer contributions12
 141
Benefits paid(120) (109)
Fair value of plan assets at end of year2,836
 2,517
Accrued liability$(162) $(146)
At December 31, 2017, the projected benefit obligations for the qualified and non-qualified pension plans were $2.9 billion and $126 million, respectively. All pension plan assets are related to the qualified pension plan.
Amounts recognized in the balance sheets at December 31, 2017 and 2016 related to the Company's pension plans consist of the following:
 2017 2016
 (in millions)
Other regulatory assets, deferred$890
 $870
Other current liabilities(12) (12)
Employee benefit obligations(150) (134)
Presented below are the amounts included in regulatory assets at December 31, 2017 and 2016 related to the defined benefit pension plans that had not yet been recognized in net periodic pension cost along with the estimated amortization of such amounts for 2018.

NOTES (continued)
Alabama Power Company 2017 Annual Report

 2017 2016 
Estimated
Amortization
in 2018
 (in millions)
Prior service cost$8
 $10
 $1
Net (gain) loss882
 860
 54
Regulatory assets$890
 $870
  
The changes in the balance of regulatory assets related to the defined benefit pension plans for the years ended December 31, 2017 and 2016 are presented in the following table:
 2017 2016
 (in millions)
Regulatory assets:   
Beginning balance$870
 $822
Net (gain) loss64
 84
Change in prior service costs
 7
Reclassification adjustments:   
Amortization of prior service costs(2) (3)
Amortization of net gain (loss)(42) (40)
Total reclassification adjustments(44) (43)
Total change20
 48
Ending balance$890
 $870
Components of net periodic pension cost were as follows:
 2017 2016 2015
 (in millions)
Service cost$63
 $57
 $59
Interest cost98
 95
 106
Expected return on plan assets(196) (184) (178)
Recognized net (gain) loss42
 40
 55
Net amortization2
 3
 6
Net periodic pension cost$9
 $11
 $48
Net periodic pension cost is the sum of service cost, interest cost, and other costs netted against the expected return on plan assets. The expected return on plan assets is determined by multiplying the expected rate of return on plan assets and the market-related value of plan assets. In determining the market-related value of plan assets, the Company has elected to amortize changes in the market value of all plan assets over five years rather than recognize the changes immediately. As a result, the accounting value of plan assets that is used to calculate the expected return on plan assets differs from the current fair value of the plan assets.

NOTES (continued)
Alabama Power Company 2017 Annual Report

Future benefit payments reflect expected future service and are estimated based on assumptions used to measure the projected benefit obligation for the pension plans. At December 31, 2017, estimated benefit payments were as follows:
 
Benefit
Payments
 (in millions)
2018$129
2019134
2020139
2021143
2022148
2023 to 2027807
Other Postretirement Benefits
Changes in the APBO and in the fair value of plan assets during the plan years ended December 31, 2017 and 2016 were as follows:
 2017 2016
 (in millions)
Change in benefit obligation   
Benefit obligation at beginning of year$501
 $505
Service cost6
 5
Interest cost17
 18
Benefits paid(29) (28)
Actuarial (gain) loss20
 (1)
Retiree drug subsidy2
 2
Balance at end of year517
 501
Change in plan assets   
Fair value of plan assets at beginning of year367
 363
Actual return (loss) on plan assets60
 23
Employer contributions6
 7
Benefits paid(27) (26)
Fair value of plan assets at end of year406
 367
Accrued liability$(111) $(134)
Amounts recognized in the balance sheets at December 31, 2017 and 2016 related to the Company's other postretirement benefit plans consist of the following:
 2017 2016
 (in millions)
Other regulatory assets, deferred$63
 $86
Other regulatory liabilities, deferred(7) (10)
Employee benefit obligations(111) (134)

NOTES (continued)
Alabama Power Company 2017 Annual Report

Presented below are the amounts included in net regulatory assets (liabilities) at December 31, 2017 and 2016 related to the other postretirement benefit plans that had not yet been recognized in net periodic other postretirement benefit cost along with the estimated amortization of such amounts for 2018.
 2017 2016 
Estimated
Amortization
in 2018
 (in millions)
Prior service cost$11
 $15
 $4
Net (gain) loss45
 61
 1
Net regulatory assets$56
 $76
  
The changes in the balance of net regulatory assets (liabilities) related to the other postretirement benefit plans for the plan years ended December 31, 2017 and 2016 are presented in the following table:
 2017 2016
 (in millions)
Net regulatory assets (liabilities):   
Beginning balance$76
 $82
Net (gain) loss(15) 
Reclassification adjustments:   
Amortization of prior service costs(4) (4)
Amortization of net gain (loss)(1) (2)
Total reclassification adjustments(5) (6)
Total change(20) (6)
Ending balance$56
 $76
Components of the other postretirement benefit plans' net periodic cost were as follows:
 2017 2016 2015
 (in millions)
Service cost$6
 $5
 $6
Interest cost17
 18
 20
Expected return on plan assets(25) (25) (26)
Net amortization5
 6
 5
Net periodic postretirement benefit cost$3
 $4
 $5
Future benefit payments, including prescription drug benefits, reflect expected future service and are estimated based on assumptions used to measure the APBO for the other postretirement benefit plans. Estimated benefit payments are reduced by drug subsidy receipts expected as a result of the Medicare Prescription Drug, Improvement, and Modernization Act of 2003 as follows:
 
Benefit
Payments
 
Subsidy
Receipts
 Total
 (in millions)
2018$31
 $(2) $29
201932
 (2) 30
202033
 (3) 30
202134
 (3) 31
202235
 (3) 32
2023 to 2027173
 (14) 159

NOTES (continued)
Alabama Power Company 2017 Annual Report

Benefit Plan Assets
Pension plan and other postretirement benefit plan assets are managed and invested in accordance with all applicable requirements, including ERISA and the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended. The Company's investment policies for both the pension plan and the other postretirement benefit plans cover a diversified mix of assets, including equity and fixed income securities, real estate, and private equity. Derivative instruments are used primarily to gain efficient exposure to the various asset classes and as hedging tools. The Company minimizes the risk of large losses primarily through diversification but also monitors and manages other aspects of risk.
The composition of the Company's pension plan and other postretirement benefit plan assets as of December 31, 2017 and 2016, along with the targeted mix of assets for each plan, is presented below:
 Target 2017 2016
Pension plan assets:     
Domestic equity26% 31% 29%
International equity25
 25
 22
Fixed income23
 24
 29
Special situations3
 1
 2
Real estate investments14
 13
 13
Private equity9
 6
 5
Total100% 100% 100%
Other postretirement benefit plan assets:     
Domestic equity42% 44% 44%
International equity22
 22
 20
Domestic fixed income28
 28
 29
Special situations1
 
 1
Real estate investments4
 4
 4
Private equity3
 2
 2
Total100% 100% 100%
The investment strategy for plan assets related to the Company's qualified pension plan is to be broadly diversified across major asset classes. The asset allocation is established after consideration of various factors that affect the assets and liabilities of the pension plan including, but not limited to, historical and expected returns and interest rates, volatility, correlations of asset classes, the current level of assets and liabilities, and the assumed growth in assets and liabilities. Because a significant portion of the liability of the pension plan is long-term in nature, the assets are invested consistent with long-term investment expectations for return and risk. To manage the actual asset class exposures relative to the target asset allocation, the Company employs a formal rebalancing program. As additional risk management, external investment managers and service providers are subject to written guidelines to ensure appropriate and prudent investment practices. Management believes the portfolio is well-diversified with no significant concentrations of risk.
Investment Strategies
Detailed below is a description of the investment strategies for each major asset category for the pension and other postretirement benefit plans disclosed above:
Domestic equity. A mix of large and small capitalization stocks with generally an equal distribution of value and growth attributes, managed both actively and through passive index approaches.
International equity. A mix of growth stocks and value stocks with both developed and emerging market exposure, managed both actively and through passive index approaches.
Fixed income. A mix of domestic and international bonds.
Trust-owned life insurance (TOLI). Investments of the Company's taxable trusts aimed at minimizing the impact of taxes on the portfolio.
Special situations. Investments in opportunistic strategies with the objective of diversifying and enhancing returns and exploiting short-term inefficiencies as well as investments in promising new strategies of a longer-term nature.

NOTES (continued)
Alabama Power Company 2017 Annual Report

Real estate investments. Investments in traditional private market, equity-oriented investments in real properties (indirectly through pooled funds or partnerships) and in publicly traded real estate securities.
Private equity. Investments in private partnerships that invest in private or public securities typically through privately-negotiated and/or structured transactions, including leveraged buyouts, venture capital, and distressed debt.
Benefit Plan Asset Fair Values
Following are the fair value measurements for the pension plan and the other postretirement benefit plan assets as of December 31, 2017 and 2016. The fair values presented are prepared in accordance with GAAP. For purposes of determining the fair value of the pension plan and other postretirement benefit plan assets and the appropriate level designation, management relies on information provided by the plan's trustee. This information is reviewed and evaluated by management with changes made to the trustee information as appropriate.
Valuation methods of the primary fair value measurements disclosed in the following tables are as follows:
Domestic and international equity.Investments in equity securities such as common stocks, American depositary receipts, and real estate investment trusts that trade on a public exchange are classified as Level 1 investments and are valued at the closing price in the active market. Equity investments with unpublished prices (i.e. pooled funds) are valued as Level 2, when the underlying holdings used to value the investment are comprised of Level 1 or Level 2 equity securities.
Fixed income.Investments in fixed income securities are generally classified as Level 2 investments and are valued based on prices reported in the market place. Additionally, the value of fixed income securities takes into consideration certain items such as broker quotes, spreads, yield curves, interest rates, and discount rates that apply to the term of a specific instrument.
TOLI. Investments in TOLI policies are classified as Level 2 investments and are valued based on the underlying investments held in the policy's separate account. The underlying assets are equity and fixed income pooled funds that are comprised of Level 1 and Level 2 securities.
Real estate investments, private equity, and special situations investments.Investments in real estate, private equity, and special situations are generally classified as Net Asset Value as a Practical Expedient, since the underlying assets typically do not have publicly available observable inputs. The fund manager values the assets using various inputs and techniques depending on the nature of the underlying investments. Techniques may include purchase multiples for comparable transactions, comparable public company trading multiples, discounted cash flow analysis, prevailing market capitalization rates, recent sales of comparable investments, and independent third-party appraisals. The fair value of partnerships is determined by aggregating the value of the underlying assets less liabilities.

NOTES (continued)
Alabama Power Company 2017 Annual Report

The fair values of pension plan assets as of December 31, 2017 and 2016 are presented below. These fair value measurements exclude cash, receivables related to investment income, pending investments sales, and payables related to pending investment purchases.
 Fair Value Measurements Using  
 
Quoted Prices
in Active Markets for Identical Assets
 Significant Other Observable Inputs Significant Unobservable Inputs Net Asset Value as a Practical Expedient  
As of December 31, 2017:(Level 1) (Level 2) (Level 3) (NAV) Total
 (in millions)
Assets:         
Domestic equity(*)
$572
 $276
 $
 $
 $848
International equity(*)
370
 333
 
 
 703
Fixed income:         
U.S. Treasury, government, and agency bonds
 200
 
 
 200
Mortgage- and asset-backed securities
 2
 
 
 2
Corporate bonds
 286
 
 
 286
Pooled funds
 155
 
 
 155
Cash equivalents and other51
 3
 
 
 54
Real estate investments111
 
 
 283
 394
Special situations
 
 
 43
 43
Private equity
 
 
 159
 159
Total$1,104
 $1,255
 $
 $485
 $2,844
(*)Level 1 securities consist of actively traded stocks while Level 2 securities consist of pooled funds.

NOTES (continued)
Alabama Power Company 2017 Annual Report

 Fair Value Measurements Using  
 
Quoted Prices
in Active Markets for Identical Assets
 Significant Other Observable Inputs Significant Unobservable Inputs Net Asset Value as a Practical Expedient  
As of December 31, 2016:(Level 1) (Level 2) (Level 3) (NAV) Total
 (in millions)
Assets:         
Domestic equity(*)
$477
 $220
 $
 $
 $697
International equity(*)
292
 264
 
 
 556
Fixed income:         
U.S. Treasury, government, and agency bonds
 140
 
 
 140
Mortgage- and asset-backed securities
 3
 
 
 3
Corporate bonds
 235
 
 
 235
Pooled funds
 124
 
 
 124
Cash equivalents and other236
 1
 
 
 237
Real estate investments74
 
 
 274
 348
Special situations
 
 
 43
 43
Private equity
 
 
 130
 130
Total$1,079
 $987
 $
 $447
 $2,513
(*)Level 1 securities consist of actively traded stocks while Level 2 securities consist of pooled funds.

NOTES (continued)
Alabama Power Company 2017 Annual Report

The fair values of other postretirement benefit plan assets as of December 31, 2017 and 2016 are presented below. These fair value measurements exclude cash, receivables related to investment income, pending investments sales, and payables related to pending investment purchases.
 Fair Value Measurements Using  
 Quoted Prices in Active Markets for Identical Assets Significant Other Observable Inputs Significant Unobservable Inputs Net Asset Value as a Practical Expedient  
As of December 31, 2017:(Level 1) (Level 2) (Level 3) (NAV) Total
 (in millions)
Assets:         
Domestic equity(*)
$52
 $12
 $
 $
 $64
International equity(*)
16
 14
 
 
 30
Fixed income:         
U.S. Treasury, government, and agency bonds
 11
 
 
 11
Corporate bonds
 12
 
 
 12
Pooled funds
 7
 
 
 7
Cash equivalents and other2
 
 
 
 2
Trust-owned life insurance
 253
 
 
 253
Real estate investments5
 
 
 12
 17
Special situations
 
 
 2
 2
Private equity
 
 
 7
 7
Total$75
 $309
 $
 $21
 $405
(*)Level 1 securities consist of actively traded stocks while Level 2 securities consist of pooled funds.

NOTES (continued)
Alabama Power Company 2017 Annual Report

 Fair Value Measurements Using  
 Quoted Prices in Active Markets for Identical Assets Significant Other Observable Inputs Significant Unobservable Inputs Net Asset Value as a Practical Expedient  
As of December 31, 2016:(Level 1) (Level 2) (Level 3) (NAV) Total
 (in millions)
Assets:         
Domestic equity(*)
$51
 $10
 $
 $
 $61
International equity(*)
13
 12
 
 
 25
Fixed income:         
U.S. Treasury, government, and agency bonds
 7
 
 
 7
Corporate bonds
 10
 
 
 10
Pooled funds
 5
 
 
 5
Cash equivalents and other14
 
 
 
 14
Trust-owned life insurance
 220
 
 
 220
Real estate investments4
 
 
 12
 16
Special situations
 
 
 2
 2
Private equity
 
 
 6
 6
Total$82
 $264
 $
 $20
 $366
(*)Level 1 securities consist of actively traded stocks while Level 2 securities consist of pooled funds.
Employee Savings Plan
The Company also sponsors a 401(k) defined contribution plan covering substantially all employees. The Company matches a portion of the first 6% of employee base salary contributions. The maximum Company match is 5.1% of an employee's base salary. Total matching contributions made to the plan for 2017, 2016, and 2015 were $23 million, $23 million, and $22 million, respectively.
3. CONTINGENCIES AND REGULATORY MATTERS
General Litigation Matters
The Company is subject to certain claims and legal actions arising in the ordinary course of business. In addition, the Company's business activities are subject to extensive governmental regulation related to public health and the environment, such as regulation of air emissions and water discharges. Litigation over environmental issues and claims of various types, including property damage, personal injury, common law nuisance, and citizen enforcement of environmental requirements such as standards for air, water, land, and protection of other natural resources, has occurred throughout the U.S. This litigation has included claims for damages alleged to have been caused by CO2 and other emissions, CCR, and alleged exposure to hazardous materials, and/or requests for injunctive relief in connection with such matters. The ultimate outcome of such pending or potential litigation against the Company cannot be predicted at this time; however, for current proceedings not specifically reported herein, management does not anticipate that the ultimate liabilities, if any, arising from such current proceedings would have a material effect on the Company's financial statements.
Environmental Matters
Environmental Remediation
The Company must comply with environmental laws and regulations that cover the handling and disposal of waste and releases of hazardous substances. Under these various laws and regulations, the Company could incur substantial costs to clean up affected sites. The Company conducts studies to determine the extent of any required cleanup and has recognized in its financial statements the estimated costs to clean up known sites. Amounts for cleanup and ongoing monitoring costs were not material for any year presented. The Company may be liable for some or all required cleanup costs for additional sites that may require

NOTES (continued)
Alabama Power Company 2017 Annual Report

environmental remediation. The Company recognizes a liability for environmental remediation costs only when it determines a loss is probable and reasonably estimable.
Nuclear Fuel Disposal Costs
Acting through the DOE and pursuant to the Nuclear Waste Policy Act of 1982, the U.S. government entered into a contract with the Company that requires the DOE to dispose of spent nuclear fuel and high level radioactive waste generated at Plant Farley beginning no later than January 31, 1998. The DOE has yet to commence the performance of its contractual and statutory obligation to dispose of spent nuclear fuel. Consequently, the Company has pursued and continues to pursue legal remedies against the U.S. government for its partial breach of contract.
In 2014, the Court of Federal Claims entered a judgment in favor of the Company in its spent nuclear fuel lawsuit seeking damages for the period from January 1, 2005 through December 31, 2010. In 2015, the Company recovered approximately $26 million, which was applied to reduce the cost of service for the benefit of customers.
In 2014, the Company filed a lawsuit against the U.S. government for the costs of continuing to store spent nuclear fuel at Plant Farley for the period from January 1, 2011 through December 31, 2013. The damage period was subsequently extended to December 31, 2014. On October 10, 2017, the Company filed an additional lawsuit against the U.S. government in the Court of Federal Claims for the costs of continuing to store spent nuclear fuel at Plant Farley for the period from January 1, 2015 through December 31, 2017. Damages will continue to accumulate until the issue is resolved or storage is provided. No amounts have been recognized in the financial statements as of December 31, 2017 for any potential recoveries from the pending lawsuits. The final outcome of these matters cannot be determined at this time. However, the Company expects to credit any recovery back for the benefit of customers in accordance with direction from the Alabama PSC and, therefore, no material impact on the Company's net income is expected.
At Plant Farley, on-site dry spent fuel storage facilities are operational and can be expanded to accommodate spent fuel through the expected life of the plant.
FERC Matters
The Company has authority from the FERC to sell electricity at market-based rates. Since 2008, that authority, for certain balancing authority areas, has been conditioned on compliance with the requirements of an energy auction, which the FERC found to be tailored mitigation that addresses potential market power concerns. In accordance with FERC regulations governing such authority, the traditional electric operating companies (including the Company) and Southern Power filed a triennial market power analysis in 2014, which included continued reliance on the energy auction as tailored mitigation. In 2015, the FERC issued an order finding that the traditional electric operating companies' (including the Company's) and Southern Power's existing tailored mitigation may not effectively mitigate the potential to exert market power in certain areas served by the traditional electric operating companies and in some adjacent areas. The FERC directed the traditional electric operating companies (including the Company) and Southern Power to show why market-based rate authority should not be revoked in these areas or to provide a mitigation plan to further address market power concerns. The traditional electric operating companies (including the Company) and Southern Power filed a request for rehearing and filed their response with the FERC in 2015.
In December 2016, the traditional electric operating companies (including the Company) and Southern Power filed an amendment to their market-based rate tariff that proposed certain changes to the energy auction, as well as several non-tariff changes. On February 2, 2017, the FERC issued an order accepting all such changes subject to an additional condition of cost-based price caps for certain sales outside of the energy auction, finding that all of these changes would provide adequate alternative mitigation for the traditional electric operating companies' (including the Company's) and Southern Power's potential to exert market power in certain areas served by the traditional electric operating companies (including the Company) and in some adjacent areas. On May 17, 2017, the FERC accepted the traditional electric operating companies' (including the Company's) and Southern Power's compliance filing accepting the terms of the order. While the FERC's February 2, 2017 order references the market power proceeding discussed above, it remains a separate, ongoing matter.

NOTES (continued)
Alabama Power Company 2017 Annual Report

On October 25, 2017, the FERC issued an order in response to the traditional electric operating companies' (including the Company's) and Southern Power's June 29, 2017 triennial updated market power analysis. The FERC directed the traditional electric operating companies (including the Company) and Southern Power to show cause within 60 days why market-based rate authority should not be revoked in certain areas adjacent to the area presently under mitigation in accordance with the February 2, 2017 order or to provide a mitigation plan to further address market power concerns. On November 10, 2017, the traditional electric operating companies (including the Company) and Southern Power responded to the FERC and proposed to resolve matters by applying the alternative mitigation authorized by the February 2, 2017 order to the adjacent areas made the subject of the October 25, 2017 order.
The ultimate outcome of these matters cannot be determined at this time.
Retail Regulatory Matters
Rate RSE
The Alabama PSC has adopted Rate RSE that provides for periodic annual adjustments based upon the Company's projected weighted cost of equity (WCE) compared to an allowable range. Rate RSE adjustments are based on forward-looking information for the applicable upcoming calendar year. Retail rates remain unchanged when the WCE ranges between 5.75% and 6.21% with an adjusting point of 5.98% and eligibility for a performance-based adder of seven basis points, or 0.07%, to the WCE adjusting point if the Company (i) has an "A" credit rating equivalent with at least one of the recognized rating agencies or (ii) is in the top one-third of a designated customer value benchmark survey. Rate RSE adjustments for any two-year period, when averaged together, cannot exceed 4.0% and any annual adjustment is limited to 5.0%. If the Company's actual retail return is above the allowed WCE range, the excess will be refunded to customers unless otherwise directed by the Alabama PSC; however, there is no provision for additional customer billings should the actual retail return fall below the WCE range.
At December 31, 2016, the Company's retail return exceeded the allowed WCE range which resulted in the Company establishing a $73 million Rate RSE refund liability. In accordance with an Alabama PSC order issued on February 14, 2017, the Company applied the full amount of the refund to reduce the under recovered balance of Rate CNP PPA as discussed further below.
Effective in January 2017, Rate RSE increased 4.48%, or $245 million annually. At December 31, 2017, the Company's actual retail return was within the allowed WCE range. On December 1, 2017, the Company made its required annual Rate RSE submission to the Alabama PSC of projected data for calendar year 2018. Projected earnings were within the specified range; therefore, retail rates under Rate RSE remained unchanged for 2018.
In conjunction with Rate RSE, the Company has an established retail tariff that provides for an adjustment to customer billings to recognize the impact of a change in the statutory income tax rate. As a result of Tax Reform Legislation, the application of this tariff would reduce annual retail revenue by approximately $250 million over the remainder of 2018. The ultimate outcome of this matter cannot be determined at this time.
Rate CNP PPA
The Company's retail rates, approved by the Alabama PSC, provide for adjustments under Rate CNP to recognize the placing of new generating facilities into retail service. The Company may also recover retail costs associated with certificated PPAs under Rate CNP PPA. On March 7, 2017, the Alabama PSC issued a consent order that the Company leave in effect the current Rate CNP PPA factor for billings for the period April 1, 2017 through March 31, 2018. No adjustment to Rate CNP PPA is expected in 2018. As of December 31, 2017 and 2016, the Company had an under recovered Rate CNP PPA balance of $12 million and $142 million, respectively, which is included in deferred under recovered regulatory clause revenues in the balance sheet.
In accordance with an accounting order issued on February 17, 2017 by the Alabama PSC, the Company eliminated the under recovered balance in Rate CNP PPA at December 31, 2016, which totaled approximately $142 million. As discussed herein under "Rate RSE," the Company utilized the full amount of its $73 million Rate RSE refund liability to reduce the amount of the Rate CNP PPA under recovery and reclassified the remaining $69 million to a separate regulatory asset. The amortization of the new regulatory asset through Rate RSE will begin concurrently with the effective date of the Company's next depreciation study, which is expected to occur within the next two to four years. The Company's current depreciation study became effective January 1, 2017.
Rate CNP Compliance
Rate CNP Compliance allows for the recovery of the Company's retail costs associated with laws, regulations, and other such mandates directed at the utility industry involving the environment, security, reliability, safety, sustainability, or similar considerations impacting the Company's facilities or operations. Rate CNP Compliance is based on forward-looking information

NOTES (continued)
Alabama Power Company 2017 Annual Report

and provides for the recovery of these costs pursuant to a factor that is calculated annually. Compliance costs to be recovered include operations and maintenance expenses, depreciation, and a return on certain invested capital. Revenues for Rate CNP Compliance, as recorded on the financial statements, are adjusted for differences in actual recoverable costs and amounts billed in current regulated rates. Accordingly, changes in the billing factor will have no significant effect on the Company's revenues or net income, but will affect annual cash flow. Changes in Rate CNP Compliance-related operations and maintenance expenses and depreciation generally will have no effect on net income.
In accordance with an accounting order issued on February 17, 2017 by the Alabama PSC, the Company reclassified $36 million of its under recovered balance in Rate CNP Compliance to a separate regulatory asset. The amortization of the new regulatory asset through Rate RSE will begin concurrently with the effective date of the Company's next depreciation study, which is expected to occur within the next two to four years. The Company's current depreciation study became effective January 1, 2017.
On December 5, 2017, the Alabama PSC issued a consent order that the Company leave in effect for 2018 the factors associated with the Company's compliance costs for the year 2017, with any under-collected amount for prior years deemed recovered before any current year amounts. Any under recovered amounts associated with 2018 will be reflected in the 2019 filing. As of December 31, 2017 and 2016, the Company had a deferred under recovered regulatory clause revenues balance of $17 million and $9 million, respectively.
Rate ECR
The Company has established energy cost recovery rates under the Company's Rate ECR as approved by the Alabama PSC. Rates are based on an estimate of future energy costs and the current over or under recovered balance. Revenues recognized under Rate ECR and recorded on the financial statements are adjusted for the difference in actual recoverable fuel costs and amounts billed in current regulated rates. The difference in the recoverable fuel costs and amounts billed give rise to the over or under recovered amounts recorded as regulatory assets or liabilities. The Company, along with the Alabama PSC, continually monitors the over or under recovered cost balance to determine whether an adjustment to billing rates is required. Changes in the Rate ECR factor have no significant effect on the Company's net income, but will impact operating cash flows. Currently, the Alabama PSC may approve billing rates under Rate ECR of up to 5.910 cents per KWH.
In accordance with an accounting order issued on February 17, 2017 by the Alabama PSC, the Company reclassified $36 million of its under recovered balance in Rate ECR to a separate regulatory asset. The amortization of the new regulatory asset through Rate RSE will begin concurrently with the effective date of the Company's next depreciation study, which is expected to occur within the next two to four years. The Company's current depreciation study became effective January 1, 2017.
On December 5, 2017, the Alabama PSC issued a consent order that the Company leave in effect for 2018 the energy cost recovery rates which began in 2017. Therefore, the Rate ECR factor as of January 1, 2018 remained at 2.015 cents per KWH. The rate will return to 5.910 cents per KWH in 2019, absent a further order from the Alabama PSC.
At December 31, 2017, the Company's under recovered fuel costs totaled $25 million, which is included in deferred under recovered regulatory clause revenues. At December 31, 2016, the Company had an over recovered fuel balance of $76 million, which was included in other regulatory liabilities, current. These classifications are based on estimates, which include such factors as weather, generation availability, energy demand, and the price of energy. A change in any of these factors could have a material impact on the timing of any recovery or return of fuel costs.
Rate NDR
Based on an order from the Alabama PSC, the Company maintains a reserve for operations and maintenance expenses to cover the cost of damages from major storms to its transmission and distribution facilities. The order approves a separate monthly Rate NDR charge to customers consisting of two components. The first component is intended to establish and maintain a reserve balance for future storms and is an on-going part of customer billing. When the reserve balance falls below $50 million, a reserve establishment charge will be activated (and the on-going reserve maintenance charge concurrently suspended) until the reserve balance reaches $75 million. The second component of the Rate NDR charge is intended to allow recovery of any existing deferred storm-related operations and maintenance costs and any future reserve deficits over a 24-month period. The Alabama PSC order gives the Company authority to record a deficit balance in the NDR when costs of storm damage exceed any established reserve balance. Absent further Alabama PSC approval, the maximum total Rate NDR charge consisting of both components is $10 per month per non-residential customer account and $5 per month per residential customer account. The Company has the authority, based on an order from the Alabama PSC, to accrue certain additional amounts as circumstances warrant. The order allows for reliability-related expenditures to be charged against the additional accruals when the NDR balance exceeds $75 million. The Company may designate a portion of the NDR to reliability-related expenditures as a part of an annual budget process for the following year or during the current year for identified unbudgeted reliability-related expenditures that are

NOTES (continued)
Alabama Power Company 2017 Annual Report

incurred. Accruals that have not been designated can be used to offset storm charges. Additional accruals to the NDR will enhance the Company's ability to deal with the financial effects of future natural disasters, promote system reliability, and offset costs retail customers would otherwise bear. No such accruals were recorded or designated in any period presented.
In December 2017, the reserve maintenance charge was suspended and the reserve establishment charge was activated as a result of the NDR balance falling below $50 million. The Company expects to collect approximately $16 million annually until the reserve balance is restored to $75 million. The NDR balance at December 31, 2017 was $38 million.
As revenue from the Rate NDR charge is recognized, an equal amount of operations and maintenance expenses related to the NDR will also be recognized. As a result, the Rate NDR charge will not have an effect on net income but will impact operating cash flows.
Environmental Accounting Order
Based on an order from the Alabama PSC the Company(Environmental Accounting Order), Alabama Power is allowed to establish a regulatory asset to record the unrecovered investment costs, including the unrecovered plant asset balance and the unrecovered costs associated with site removal and closure associated with future unit retirements caused by environmental regulations. The regulatory asset will beis being amortized and recovered over the affected unit's remaining useful life, as established prior to the decision regarding early retirement through Rate CNP Compliance. At December 31, 2018, this regulatory asset had a balance of $42 million. See "Environmental MattersEnvironmental Laws and Regulations" herein for additional information regarding environmental regulations.
The Company retiredSubsequent to December 31, 2018, Alabama Power determined that Plant Gorgas Units 68, 9, and 7 (20010 (approximately 1,000 MWs) will be retired by April 15, 2019 due to the expected costs of compliance with federal and Plant Barry Unit 3 (225 MWs) in 2015. Additionally, the Company ceased using coal at Plant Barry Units 1 and 2 (250 MWs) in 2015, but such units remain available on a limited basis with natural gas as the fuel source. In April 2016, the Company also ceased using coal at Plant Greene County Units 1 and 2 (300 MWs representing the Company's ownership interest) and began operating Units 1 and 2 solely on natural gas in June 2016 and July 2016, respectively.
state environmental regulations. In accordance with this accounting order from the Alabama PSC,Environmental Accounting Order, approximately $740 million of net investment costs will be transferred to a regulatory asset at the Company transferred the unrecovered plant asset balances to regulatory assets at their respective retirement dates. These regulatory assets are being amortizeddate and recovered through Rate CNP Compliance over the affected units' remaining useful lives, as established prior to the decision to retire.
Georgia Power
Georgia Power's revenues from regulated retail operations are collected through various rate mechanisms subject to the oversight of the Georgia PSC. Georgia Power currently recovers its costs from the regulated retail business through the 2013 ARP, which includes traditional base tariff rates, Demand-Side Management (DSM) tariffs, Environmental Compliance Cost Recovery (ECCR) tariffs, and Municipal Franchise Fee (MFF) tariffs. Georgia Power is scheduled to file a base rate case by July 1, 2019, which may continue or modify these tariffs. In addition, financing costs on certified construction costs of Plant Vogtle Units 3 and 4 are being collected through the NCCR tariff and fuel costs are collected through a separate fuel cost recovery tariff. See Note 2 to the financial statements under "Georgia Power" for retirement; therefore, these decisions associated with coal operations had no significant impact onadditional information.
Rate Plans
Pursuant to the terms and conditions of a settlement agreement related to Southern Company's financial statements.
4. JOINT OWNERSHIP AGREEMENTS
Theacquisition of Southern Company Gas approved by the Georgia PSC in 2016, the 2013 ARP will continue in effect until December 31, 2019, and Georgia Power own equallywill be required to file its next base rate case by July 1, 2019. Furthermore, through December 31, 2019, Georgia Power will retain its merger savings, net of transition costs, as defined in the settlement agreement; through December 31, 2022, such net merger savings will be shared on a 60/40 basis with customers; thereafter, all of the outstanding capital stock of SEGCO, which owns electric generating units with a total rated capacity of 1,020 MWs, as well as associated transmission facilities. SEGCO uses natural gas as the primary fuel source for 1,000 MWs of its generating capacity. The capacity of these units is sold equallymerger savings will be retained by customers. See Note 15 to the financial statements under "Southern Company Merger with Southern Company Gas" for additional information regarding the Merger.
There were no changes to Georgia Power's traditional base tariff rates, ECCR tariff, DSM tariffs, or MFF tariff in 2017 or 2018.
Under the 2013 ARP, Georgia Power's retail ROE is set at 10.95% and earnings are evaluated against a retail ROE range of 10.00% to 12.00%. Two-thirds of any earnings above 12.00% will be directly refunded to customers, with the remaining one-third retained by Georgia Power. There will be no recovery of any earnings shortfall below 10.00% on an actual basis. In 2016, Georgia Power's retail ROE exceeded 12.00%, and Georgia Power underrefunded to retail customers in 2018 approximately $40 million as approved by the Georgia PSC. On February 5, 2019, the Georgia PSC approved a power contract. The Company andsettlement between Georgia Power make payments sufficient to provide forand the operating expenses, taxes, interest expense, and ROE. The Company's share of purchased power totaled $76 million in 2017, $55 million in 2016, and $76 million in 2015 and is included in "Purchased power from affiliates" in the statements of income. The Company accounts for SEGCO using the equity method.
In addition, the Company has guaranteed unconditionally the obligation of SEGCO under an installment sale agreement for the purchase of certain pollution control facilities at SEGCO's generating units, pursuant to which $25 million principal amount of pollution control revenue bonds are outstanding. The Company has guaranteed $100 million principal amount of unsecured senior notes issued by SEGCO for general corporate purposes. These senior notes mature on December 1, 2018. Georgia Power has agreed to reimburse the Company for the pro rata portion of such obligations corresponding to its then proportionate ownership of stock of SEGCO if the Company is called upon to make such payment under its guarantee.
At December 31, 2017, the capitalization of SEGCO consisted of $95 million of equity and $125 million of long-term debt on which the annual interest requirement is $4 million. In addition, SEGCO had short-term debt outstanding of $14 million. SEGCO paid $24 million of dividends in 2017 and 2016 compared to an immaterial amount in 2015, of which one-half of each was paid to the Company. In addition, the Company recognizes 50% of SEGCO's net income.
The Company, which owns and operates a generating unit adjacent to the SEGCO generating units, has a joint ownership agreement with SEGCO for the ownership of an associated gas pipeline. The Company owns 14% of the pipeline with the remaining 86% owned by SEGCO.staff
    Table of Contents                                Index to Financial Statements

NOTESMANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS (continued)
Alabama PowerSouthern Company 2017and Subsidiary Companies 2018 Annual Report


of the Georgia PSC under which Georgia Power's retail ROE for 2017 was stipulated to exceed 12.00% and Georgia Power will reduce certain regulatory assets by approximately $4 million in lieu of providing refunds to retail customers. In addition2018, Georgia Power's retail ROE exceeded 12.00%, and Georgia Power accrued approximately $100 million to refund to retail customers, subject to review and approval by the Georgia PSC.
On April 3, 2018, the Georgia PSC approved the Georgia Power Tax Reform Settlement Agreement. Pursuant to the Company's ownership of SEGCO and joint ownership of an associated gas pipeline,Georgia Power Tax Reform Settlement Agreement, to reflect the Company's percentage ownership and investment in jointly-owned generating plants at December 31, 2017 were as follows:
FacilityTotal MW Capacity Company Ownership  Plant in Service Accumulated Depreciation Construction Work in Progress
      (in millions)
Greene County500
 60.00%
(1) 
 $172
 $65
 $2
Plant Miller          
Units 1 and 21,320
 91.84%
(2) 
 1,717
 619
 54
(1)Jointly owned with an affiliate, Mississippi Power.
(2)Jointly owned with PowerSouth Energy Cooperative, Inc.
The Company has contracted to operate and maintain its jointly-owned facilities as agent for their co-owners. The Company's proportionate share of its plant operating expenses is included in operating expenses in the statements of income and the Company is responsible for providing its own financing.
5. INCOME TAXES
On behalf of the Company, Southern Company files a consolidated federal income tax returnrate reduction impact of the Tax Reform Legislation, Georgia Power will refund to customers a total of $330 million through bill credits. Georgia Power issued bill credits of approximately $130 million in 2018 and various combinedwill issue bill credits of approximately $95 million in June 2019 and separate$105 million in February 2020. In addition, Georgia Power is deferring as a regulatory liability (i) the revenue equivalent of the tax expense reduction resulting from legislation lowering the Georgia state income tax returns. Underrate from 6.00% to 5.75% in 2019 and (ii) the entire benefit of federal and state excess accumulated deferred income taxes, which is expected to total approximately $700 million at December 31, 2019. At December 31, 2018, the related regulatory liability balance totaled $610 million. The amortization of these regulatory liabilities is expected to be addressed in the Georgia Power 2019 Base Rate Case. If there is not a joint consolidatedbase rate case in 2019, customers will receive $185 million in annual bill credits beginning in 2020, with any additional federal and state income tax allocation agreement, each Southern Company subsidiary's currentsavings deferred as a regulatory liability, until Georgia Power's next base rate case.
To address some of the negative cash flow and deferred tax expense is computed on a stand-alone basis and no subsidiary is allocated more current expense than would be paid if it filed a separate income tax return. In accordance with IRS regulations, each company is jointly and severally liable forcredit quality impacts of the federal tax liability.
Federal Tax Reform Legislation
Following the enactment of Tax Reform Legislation, the SEC staff issued Staff Accounting Bulletin 118 – "Income Tax Accounting ImplicationsGeorgia PSC also approved an increase in Georgia Power's retail equity ratio to the lower of (i) Georgia Power's actual common equity weight in its capital structure or (ii) 55%, until the Georgia Power 2019 Base Rate Case. At December 31, 2018, Georgia Power's actual retail common equity ratio (on a 13-month average basis) was approximately 55%. Benefits from reduced federal income tax rates in excess of the Tax Cutsamounts refunded to customers will be retained by Georgia Power to cover the carrying costs of the incremental equity in 2018 and Jobs Act" (SAB 118), which provides2019.
Integrated Resource Plan
See "Environmental Matters" herein for additional information regarding proposed and final EPA rules and regulations, including revisions to ELG for steam electric power plants and additional regulations of CCR and CO2.
In 2016, the Georgia PSC approved Georgia Power's triennial Integrated Resource Plan (2016 IRP) including the reclassification of the remaining net book value of Plant Mitchell Unit 3 and costs associated with materials and supplies remaining at the unit retirement date to a measurement periodregulatory asset. Recovery of the unit's net book value will continue through December 31, 2019, as provided in the 2013 ARP. The timing of the recovery of the remaining balance of the unit's net book value as of December 31, 2019 and costs associated with materials and supplies remaining at the unit retirement date was deferred for consideration in the Georgia Power 2019 Base Rate Case.
In the 2016 IRP, the Georgia PSC also approved recovery of costs up to one year from$99 million through June 30, 2019 to preserve nuclear generation as an option at a future generation site in Stewart County, Georgia. In March 2017, the enactmentGeorgia PSC approved Georgia Power's decision to suspend work at the site due to changing economics, including lower load forecasts and fuel costs. The timing of recovery for costs incurred of approximately $50 million is expected to be determined by the Georgia PSC in the Georgia Power 2019 Base Rate Case.
On January 31, 2019, Georgia Power filed its triennial IRP (2019 IRP). The filing includes a request to decertify and retire Plant Hammond Units 1 through 4 (840 MWs) and Plant McIntosh Unit 1 (142.5 MWs) upon approval of the 2019 IRP.
In the 2019 IRP, Georgia Power requested approval to reclassify the remaining net book value of Plant Hammond Units 1 through 4 (approximately $520 million at December 31, 2018) upon retirement to a regulatory asset to be amortized ratably over a period equal to the applicable unit's remaining useful life through 2035. For Plant McIntosh Unit 1, Georgia Power requested approval to reclassify the remaining net book value (approximately $40 million at December 31, 2018) upon retirement to a regulatory asset to be amortized over a three-year period to be determined in the Georgia Power 2019 Base Rate Case. Georgia Power also requested approval to reclassify any unusable material and supplies inventory balances remaining at the applicable unit's retirement date to complete accounting under GAAPa regulatory asset for recovery over a period to be determined in the Georgia Power 2019 Base Rate Case.
The 2019 IRP also includes a request to certify approximately 25 MWs of capacity at Plant Scherer Unit 3 for the tax effectsretail jurisdiction beginning January 1, 2020, following the expiration of a wholesale PPA.
The 2019 IRP also includes details regarding ARO costs associated with ash pond and landfill closures and post-closure care. Georgia Power requested the legislation. Duetiming and rate of recovery of these costs be determined by the Georgia PSC in the Georgia Power 2019 Base Rate Case. See "Environmental Matters – Environmental Laws and Regulations – Coal Combustion Residuals" and FINANCIAL CONDITION AND LIQUIDITY – "Capital Requirements and Contractual Obligations" herein and Note 6 to the complex and comprehensive nature of the enacted tax law changes, and their application under GAAP, the Company considers all amounts recorded in the financial statements as a result of Tax Reform Legislation to be "provisional" as discussed in SAB 118 and subject to revision. The Company is awaiting additional guidance from industry and income tax authorities in order to finalize its accounting. The ultimate impact of Tax Reform Legislation on deferred income tax assets and liabilities and the related regulatory assets and liabilities cannot be determined at this time. See Note 3 under "Retail Regulatory Matters – Rate RSE" for additional information.
Current and Deferred Income Taxes
Details of income tax provisions are as follows:
 2017 2016 2015
 (in millions)
Federal —     
Current$136
 $103
 $110
Deferred336
 339
 320
 472
 442
 430
State —     
Current23
 20
 8
Deferred73
 69
 68
 96
 89
 76
Total$568
 $531
 $506
information regarding Georgia Power's AROs.
    Table of Contents                                Index to Financial Statements

NOTESMANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS (continued)
Alabama PowerSouthern Company 2017and Subsidiary Companies 2018 Annual Report


The tax effectsGeorgia Power also requested approval to issue two capacity-based requests for proposals (RFP). If approved, the first capacity-based RFP will seek resources that can provide capacity beginning in 2022 or 2023 and the second capacity-based RFP will seek resources that can provide capacity beginning in 2026, 2027, or 2028. Additionally, the 2019 IRP includes a request to procure an additional 1,000 MWs of temporary differences betweenrenewable resources through a competitive bidding process. Georgia Power also proposed to invest in a portfolio of up to 50 MWs of battery energy storage technologies.
A decision from the carrying amounts of assets and liabilitiesGeorgia PSC on the 2019 IRP is expected in the financial statements and their respective tax bases, which give rise to deferred tax assets and liabilities, are as follows:mid-2019.
 2017 2016
 (in millions)
Deferred tax liabilities —   
Accelerated depreciation$2,336
 $4,307
Property basis differences398
 456
Premium on reacquired debt16
 26
Employee benefit obligations162
 201
Regulatory assets associated with employee benefit obligations260
 393
Asset retirement obligations220
 289
Regulatory assets associated with asset retirement obligations249
 347
Other147
 179
Total3,788
 6,198
Deferred tax assets —   
Federal effect of state deferred taxes143
 266
Unbilled fuel revenue22
 36
Storm reserve5
 21
Employee benefit obligations286
 427
Other comprehensive losses10
 19
Asset retirement obligations469
 636
Other93
 139
Total1,028
 1,544
Accumulated deferred income taxes, net$2,760
 $4,654
The implementation of Tax Reform Legislation significantly reduced accumulated deferred income taxes, partially offset by bonus depreciation provisions in the 2015 Protecting Americans from Tax Hikes Act. Tax Reform Legislation also significantly reduced tax-related regulatory assets and increased tax-related regulatory liabilities.
At December 31, 2017, the tax-related regulatory assets to be recovered from customers were $240 million. These assets are primarily attributable to tax benefits flowed through to customers in prior years, deferred taxes previously recognized at rates lower than the current enacted tax law, and taxes applicable to capitalized interest.
At December 31, 2017, the tax-related regulatory liabilities to be credited to customers were $2.1 billion. These liabilities are primarily attributable to deferred taxes previously recognized at rates higher than the current enacted tax law and to unamortized ITCs.
In accordance with regulatory requirements, deferred federal ITCs are amortized over the average life of the related property with such amortization normally applied as a credit to reduce depreciation in the statements of income. Credits amortized in this manner amounted to $7 million in 2017 and $8 million annually in 2016 and 2015. At December 31, 2017, the Company had federal ITC carryforwards which are expected to result in $9 million of federal income tax benefits. The federal ITC carryforwards begin expiring in 2038 but are expected to be fully utilized by 2027. The ultimate outcome of these matters cannot be determined at this time.
Tax Credit CarryforwardsStorm Damage Recovery
Georgia Power is accruing $30 million annually through December 31, 2019, as provided in the 2013 ARP, for incremental operations and maintenance costs of damage from major storms to its transmission and distribution facilities. At December 31, 2018, the total balance in the regulatory asset related to storm damage was $416 million. During October 2018, Hurricane Michael caused significant damage to Georgia Power's transmission and distribution facilities. The Company had state credit carryforwardsincremental restoration costs related to this hurricane deferred in the regulatory asset for the statestorm damage totaled approximately $115 million. Hurricanes Irma and Matthew also caused significant damage to Georgia Power's transmission and distribution facilities during September 2017 and October 2016, respectively. The incremental restoration costs related to Hurricanes Irma and Matthew deferred in Georgia Power's regulatory asset for storm damage totaled approximately $250 million. The rate of Alabama of approximately $4 million, which begin expiring in 2023 but arestorm damage cost recovery is expected to be fully utilized.adjusted as part of the Georgia Power 2019 Base Rate Case and further adjusted in future regulatory proceedings as necessary. The ultimate outcome of this matter cannot be determined at this time. See Note 2 to the financial statements under "Georgia PowerStorm Damage Recovery" for additional information regarding Georgia Power's storm damage reserve.
Mississippi Power
Mississippi Power's retail base rates generally are set under the PEP, a rate plan approved by the Mississippi PSC. Two filings are made for each calendar year: the PEP projected filing, which is typically filed prior to the beginning of the year based on a projected revenue requirement, and the PEP lookback filing, which is filed after the end of the year and allows for review of the actual revenue requirement compared to the projected filing.
On February 7, 2018, Mississippi Power revised its annual projected PEP filing for 2018 to reflect the impacts of the Tax Reform Legislation. The revised filing requested an increase of $26 million in annual revenues, based on a performance adjusted ROE of 9.33% and an increased equity ratio of 55%. On July 27, 2018, Mississippi Power and the MPUS entered into a settlement agreement with respect to the 2018 PEP filing and all unresolved PEP filings for prior years (PEP Settlement Agreement), which was approved by the Mississippi PSC on August 7, 2018. Rates under the PEP Settlement Agreement became effective with the first billing cycle of September 2018. The PEP Settlement Agreement provides for an increase of approximately $21.6 million in annual base retail revenues, which excludes certain compensation costs contested by the MPUS, as well as approximately $2 million which was subsequently approved for recovery through Mississippi Power's 2018 Energy Efficiency Cost Rider.
Pursuant to the PEP Settlement Agreement, Mississippi Power's performance-adjusted allowed ROE is 9.31% and its allowed equity ratio is capped at 51%, pending further review by the Mississippi PSC. In lieu of the requested equity ratio increase, Mississippi Power retained $44 million of excess accumulated deferred income taxes resulting from the Tax Reform Legislation until the conclusion of Mississippi Power's next base rate case, which is scheduled to be filed in the fourth quarter 2019 (Mississippi Power 2019 Base Rate Case). Further, Mississippi Power agreed to seek equity contributions sufficient to restore its equity ratio to 50% by December 31, 2018.
Pursuant to the PEP Settlement Agreement, PEP proceedings are suspended until after the conclusion of the Mississippi Power 2019 Base Rate Case and Mississippi Power is not required to make any PEP filings for regulatory years 2018, 2019, and 2020. The PEP Settlement Agreement also resolved all open PEP filings with no change to customer rates.
Kemper County Energy Facility
In 2018, Mississippi Power recorded pre-tax charges to income of $37 million ($27 million after tax), primarily resulting from the abandonment and related closure activities and ongoing period costs, net of sales proceeds, for the mine and gasifier-related assets at the Kemper County energy facility. In addition, Mississippi Power recorded a credit to earnings of $95 million in the fourth quarter 2018 primarily resulting from the reduction of a valuation allowance for a state income tax net operating loss (NOL) carryforward associated with the Kemper County energy facility. Additional closure costs for the mine and gasifier-related assets, currently estimated at up to $10 million pre-tax (excluding salvage, net of dismantlement costs), may be incurred through the first half of 2020. In addition, period costs, including, but not limited to, costs for compliance and safety, ARO accretion, and property taxes for the mine and gasifier-related assets, are estimated to total $11 million in 2019 and $2 million to $4 million annually in
    Table of Contents                                Index to Financial Statements

NOTESMANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS (continued)
Alabama PowerSouthern Company 2017and Subsidiary Companies 2018 Annual Report


Effective Tax Rate
A reconciliation2020 through 2023. Mississippi Power is currently evaluating its options regarding the final disposition of the federal statutory income tax rateCO2 pipeline, including removal of the pipeline. This evaluation is expected to be complete later in 2019. If Mississippi Power ultimately decides to remove the effective income tax rate is as follows:
 2017 2016 2015
Federal statutory rate35.0% 35.0% 35.0%
State income tax, net of federal deduction4.4 4.2 3.8
Non-deductible book depreciation0.9 1.0 1.2
AFUDC equity(1.0) (0.7) (1.6)
Tax Reform Legislation0.3  
Other (0.7) 
Effective income tax rate39.6% 38.8% 38.4%
COIn March 2016,2 pipeline, the FASB issued ASU 2016-09, which changed the accounting for income taxes for share-based payment award transactions. Entities are required to recognize all excess tax benefits and deficiencies related to the exercise or vestingcost of stock compensation as income tax expense or benefit in the income statement. The adoption of ASU 2016-09 did notremoval could have a material impact on Southern Company's financial statements. The ultimate outcome of these matters cannot be determined at this time.
The combined cycle and associated common facilities portions of the Kemper County energy facility were dedicated as Plant Ratcliffe on April 27, 2018.
For additional information on the Kemper County energy facility, see Note 2 to the financial statements under "Mississippi PowerKemper County Energy Facility."
Reserve Margin Plan
On August 6, 2018, Mississippi Power filed its proposed Reserve Margin Plan (RMP), as required by the Mississippi PSC's order in the docket established for the purposes of pursuing a global settlement of the costs related to the Kemper County energy facility. Under the RMP, Mississippi Power proposed alternatives that would reduce its reserve margin, with the most economic of the alternatives being the two-year and seven-year acceleration of the retirement of Plant Watson Units 4 and 5, respectively, to the first quarter 2022 and the four-year acceleration of the retirement of Plant Greene County Units 1 and 2 to the third quarter 2021 and the third quarter 2022, respectively, in order to lower or avoid operating costs. The Plant Greene County unit retirements would require the completion by Alabama Power of proposed transmission and system reliability improvements, as well as agreement by Alabama Power. The RMP filing also states that, in the event the Mississippi PSC ultimately approves an alternative that includes an accelerated retirement, Mississippi Power would require authorization to defer in a regulatory asset for future recovery the remaining net book value of the units at the time of retirement. A decision by the Mississippi PSC that does not include recovery of the remaining book value of any generating units retired could have a material impact on Southern Company's overall effective tax rate.financial statements. The ultimate outcome of this matter cannot be determined at this time.
Government Grants
In 2010, the DOE, through a cooperative agreement with SCS, agreed to fund $270 million of the Kemper County energy facility through the grants awarded to the project by the DOE under the Clean Coal Power Initiative Round 2. Through December 31, 2018, Mississippi Power received total DOE grants of $387 million, of which $382 million reduced the construction costs of the Kemper County energy facility and $5 million reimbursed Mississippi Power for expenses associated with DOE reporting. On December 12, 2018, Mississippi Power filed with the DOE its request for property closeout certification under the contract related to the grants received. Mississippi Power and the DOE are currently in discussions regarding the requested closeout and property disposition, which may require payment to the DOE for a portion of certain property that is to be retained by Mississippi Power. The ultimate outcome of this matter cannot be determined at this time; however, it could have a significant impact on Southern Company's financial statements.
Southern Company Gas
The natural gas distribution utilities are subject to regulation and oversight by their respective state regulatory agencies for the rates charged to their customers and other matters.
The natural gas market for Atlanta Gas Light was deregulated in 1997. Accordingly, Marketers, rather than a traditional utility, sell natural gas to end-use customers in Georgia and handle customer billing functions. Atlanta Gas Light earns revenue for its distribution services by charging rates to its customers based primarily on monthly fixed charges that are set by the Georgia PSC and adjusted periodically.
With the exception of Atlanta Gas Light, the natural gas distribution utilities are authorized by the relevant regulatory agencies in the states in which they serve to use natural gas cost recovery mechanisms that adjust rates to reflect changes in the wholesale cost of natural gas and ensure recovery of all costs prudently incurred in purchasing natural gas for customers. Natural gas cost recovery revenues are adjusted for differences in actual recoverable natural gas costs and amounts billed in current regulated rates. Changes in the billing factor will not have a significant effect on revenues or net income, but will affect cash flows. In addition to natural gas cost recovery mechanisms, there are other cost recovery mechanisms, such as regulatory riders, which vary by utility but allow recovery of certain costs, such as those related to infrastructure replacement programs, as well as environmental remediation and energy efficiency plans. See Note 1 to the financial statements under "Recently Issued Accounting StandardsCost of Natural Gas" for additional information.
Unrecognized Tax Benefits
The Company has no material unrecognized tax benefits for the periods presented. The Company classifies interest on tax uncertainties as interest expense. Accrued interest for unrecognized tax benefits was immaterial and the Company did not accrue any penalties on uncertain tax positions.
It is reasonably possible that the amount of the unrecognized tax benefits could change within 12 months. The settlement of federal and state audits could impact the balances. At this time, an estimate of the range of reasonably possible outcomes cannot be determined.
The IRS has finalized its audits of Southern Company's consolidated federal income tax returns through 2016. Southern Company is a participant in the Compliance Assurance Process of the IRS. The audits for the Company's state income tax returns have either been concluded, or the statute of limitations has expired, for years prior to 2011.
6. FINANCING
Long-Term Debt Payable to an Affiliated Trust
The Company has formed a wholly-owned trust subsidiary for the purpose of issuing preferred securities. The proceeds of the related equity investments and preferred security sales were loaned back to the Company through the issuance of junior subordinated notes totaling $206 million outstanding as of December 31, 2017 and 2016, which constitute substantially all of the assets of this trust and are reflected in the balance sheets as long-term debt payable. The Company considers that the mechanisms and obligations relating to the preferred securities issued for its benefit, taken together, constitute a full and unconditional guarantee by it of the trust's payment obligations with respect to these securities. At December 31, 2017 and 2016, trust preferred securities of $200 million were outstanding. See Note 1 under "Variable Interest Entities" for additional information on the accounting treatment for this trust and the related securities.
Securities Due Within One Year
At December 31, 2017, the Company had no securities due within one year. At December 31, 2016, the Company had $561 million of senior notes and pollution control revenue bonds due within one year.
Maturities through 2022 applicable to total long-term debt are as follows: $200 million in 2019; $250 million in 2020; $310 million in 2021; and $750 million in 2022. There are no scheduled maturities in 2018.
Bank Term Loans
At both December 31, 2017 and 2016, the Company had $45 million of outstanding bank term loan agreements, which are reflected in the statements of capitalization as long-term debt.
    Table of Contents                                Index to Financial Statements

NOTESMANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS (continued)
Alabama PowerSouthern Company 2017and Subsidiary Companies 2018 Annual Report


Infrastructure Replacement Programs and Capital Projects
In addition to capital expenditures recovered through base rates by each of the natural gas distribution utilities, Nicor Gas and Virginia Natural Gas have separate rate riders that provide timely recovery of capital expenditures for specific infrastructure replacement programs. These bank loans have covenants that limit debt levelsinfrastructure replacement programs and capital projects are risk-based and designed to 65% ofupdate and replace cast iron, bare steel, and mid-vintage plastic materials or expand the natural gas distribution systems to improve reliability and meet operational flexibility and growth. The total capitalization, as defined inexpected investment under the agreements. For purposes of calculating these covenants, any long-term notes payable to affiliated trusts are excluded from debt but included in capitalization. At December 31, 2017, the Company was in compliance with its debt limits.
Pollution Control Revenue Bonds
Pollution control revenue bond obligations represent loansinfrastructure replacement programs for 2019 is $408 million. See Note 2 to the financial statements under "Southern Company from public authoritiesGasInfrastructure Replacement Programs and Capital Projects" for additional information.
Rate Proceedings
On February 23, 2018, Atlanta Gas Light revised its annual base rate filing to reflect the impacts of funds or installment purchasesthe Tax Reform Legislation and requested a $16 million rate reduction in 2018. On May 15, 2018, the Georgia PSC approved a stipulation for Atlanta Gas Light's annual base rates to remain at the 2017 level for 2018 and 2019, with customer credits of pollution control$8 million in each of July 2018 and solid waste disposal facilities financedOctober 2018 to reflect the impacts of the Tax Reform Legislation. The Georgia PSC maintained Atlanta Gas Light's previously authorized earnings band based on a ROE between 10.55% and 10.95% and increased the allowed equity ratio by funds derived from sales by public authorities4% to an equity ratio of revenue bonds. The Company55% to address the negative cash flow and credit metric impacts of the Tax Reform Legislation. Additionally, Atlanta Gas Light is required to make payments sufficientfile a traditional base rate case on or before June 1, 2019 for rates effective January 1, 2020.
On January 31, 2018, the authorities to meet principal and interest requirements of such bonds. The Company incurred no obligationsIllinois Commission approved a $137 million increase in Nicor Gas' annual base rate revenues, including $93 million related to the issuancerecovery of pollution control revenue bondsinvestments under Nicor Gas' infrastructure program, effective February 8, 2018, based on a ROE of 9.8%.
On May 2, 2018, the Illinois Commission approved Nicor Gas' rehearing request for revised base rates to incorporate the reduction in 2017.
In August 2017, the Company repaid at maturity $36.1 million aggregate principal amount of Series 1993-A, 1993-B, and 1993-C Industrial Development Boardfederal income tax rate as a result of the CityTax Reform Legislation. The resulting decrease of Mobile, Alabama Pollution Control Revenue Refunding Bonds (Alabama Power Company Project).approximately $44 million in annual base rate revenues became effective May 5, 2018. Nicor Gas' previously-authorized capital structure and ROE of 9.80% were not addressed in the rehearing and remain unchanged. On November 9, 2018, Nicor Gas filed a general base rate case with the Illinois Commission requesting a $230 million increase in annual base rate revenues. The requested increase is based on a projected test year for the 12-month period ending September 30, 2020, a ROE of 10.6%, and an increase in the equity ratio from 52.0% to 54.0% to address the negative cash flow and credit metric impacts of the Tax Reform Legislation. The Illinois Commission is expected to rule on the requested increase within the 11-month statutory time limit, after which rate adjustments will be effective. The ultimate outcome of this matter cannot be determined at this time.
Fuel Cost Recovery
The traditional electric operating companies each have established fuel cost recovery rates approved by their respective state PSCs. Fuel cost recovery revenues are adjusted for differences in actual recoverable fuel costs and amounts billed in current regulated rates. Accordingly, changes in the billing factor will not have a significant effect on Southern Company's revenues or net income, but will affect cash flow. The traditional electric operating companies continuously monitor their under or over recovered fuel cost balances and make appropriate filings with their state PSCs to adjust fuel cost recovery rates as necessary.
See Note 1 to the financial statements under "Revenues" and Note 2 to the financial statements under "Alabama PowerRate ECR," "Georgia PowerFuel Cost Recovery," and "Mississippi PowerFuel Cost Recovery" for additional information.
Construction Program
Overview
The subsidiary companies of Southern Company had $1.06 billion and $1.10 billion of tax-exempt pollution control revenue bond obligations outstanding at December 31, 2017 and 2016, respectively, including pollution control revenue bonds classified as due within one year.
Senior Notes
In March 2017, the Company issued $550 million aggregate principal amount of Series 2017A 2.45% Senior Notes due March 30, 2022. The proceeds were used to repay the Company's short-term indebtedness and for general corporate purposes, including the Company'sare engaged in continuous construction program.
In November 2017,programs to accommodate existing and estimated future loads on their respective systems. The Southern Company system intends to continue its strategy of developing and constructing new electric generating facilities, adding environmental modifications to certain existing units, expanding and improving the electric transmission and distribution systems, and updating and expanding the natural gas distribution systems. For the traditional electric operating companies, major generation construction projects are subject to state PSC approval in order to be included in retail rates. While Southern Power generally constructs and acquires generation assets covered by long-term PPAs, any uncontracted capacity could negatively affect future earnings. Southern Company issued $550 million aggregate principal amountGas is engaged in various infrastructure improvement programs designed to update or expand the natural gas distribution systems of Series 2017B 3.70% Senior Notes due December 1, 2047.the natural gas distribution utilities to improve reliability and meet operational flexibility and growth. The proceeds were used for general corporate purposes, including the Company's continuous construction program.
At December 31, 2017natural gas distribution utilities recover their investment and 2016, the Company had $6.4 billion and $5.8 billion of senior notes outstanding, respectively, including senior notes classified as due within one year. At December 31, 2017 and 2016, the Company did not have any outstanding secured debt.
Redeemable Preferred and Preference Stock
The Company currently has preferred stock, Class A preferred stock, and common stock outstanding. The Company also has authorized preference stock, none of which is outstanding. The Company's preferred stock and Class A preferred stock, without preference between classes, rank seniora return associated with these infrastructure programs through their regulated rates. See Note 15 to the Company's common stock with respectfinancial statements under "Southern Power" for additional information about costs relating to paymentSouthern Power's acquisitions that involve construction of dividendsrenewable energy facilities and voluntary and involuntary dissolution. The preferred stock and Class A preferred stock ofNote 2 to the financial statements under "Southern Company contain a feature that allows the holders to elect a majority of the Company's board of directors if preferred dividends are not paid for four consecutive quarters. Because such a potential redemption-triggering event is not solely within the control of the Company, the preferred stock and Class A preferred stock is presented as "Redeemable Preferred Stock" in a manner consistent with temporary equity under applicable accounting standards.GasInfrastructure Replacement
    Table of Contents                                Index to Financial Statements

NOTES (continued)
Alabama Power Company 2017 Annual Report

The Company's preferred stock is subject to redemption at a price equal to the par value plus a premium. The Company's Class A preferred stock is subject to redemption at a price equal to the stated capital. All series of the Company's preferred stock currently are subject to redemption at the option of the Company. The Class A preferred stock is subject to redemption on or after October 1, 2022, or following the occurrence of a rating agency event. Information for each outstanding series is in the table below:
Preferred/Preference StockPar Value/Stated Capital Per Share
Shares Outstanding
Redemption Price Per Share
4.92% Preferred Stock$100
80,000

$103.23
4.72% Preferred Stock$100
50,000

$102.18
4.64% Preferred Stock$100
60,000

$103.14
4.60% Preferred Stock$100
100,000

$104.20
4.52% Preferred Stock$100
50,000

$102.93
4.20% Preferred Stock$100
135,115

$105.00
5.00% Class A Preferred Stock$25
10,000,000

Stated Capital(*)
(*)Prior to October 1, 2022: $25.50; on or after October 1, 2022: Stated Capital
In September 2017, the Company issued 10 million shares ($250 million aggregate stated capital) of 5.00% Class A Preferred Stock, Cumulative, Par Value $1 Per Share (Stated Capital 25 Per Share). The proceeds were used in October 2017 to redeem all 2 million shares ($50 million aggregate stated capital) of 6.50% Series Preference Stock, 6 million shares ($150 million aggregate stated capital) of 6.45% Series Preference Stock, and 1.52 million shares ($38 million aggregate stated capital) of 5.83% Class A Preferred Stock and for other general corporate purposes, including the Company's continuous construction program.
There were no changes for the year ended December 31, 2016 in redeemable preferred stock or preference stock of the Company.
Dividend Restrictions
The Company can only pay dividends to Southern Company out of retained earnings or paid-in-capital.
Bank Credit Arrangements
At December 31, 2017, committed credit arrangements with banks were as follows:
Expires     Expires Within One Year
2018 2020 2022 Total Unused Term Out No Term Out
(in millions)  (in millions) (in millions)
$35
 $500
 $800
 $1,335
 $1,335
 $
 $35
Most of the bank credit arrangements require payment of a commitment fee based on the unused portion of the commitments or the maintenance of compensating balances with the banks. Commitment fees average less than 1/4      of 1% for the Company. Compensating balances are not legally restricted from withdrawal.�� 
Subject to applicable market conditions, the Company expects to renew or replace its bank credit agreements as needed, prior to expiration. In connection therewith, the Company may extend the maturity date and/or increase or decrease the lending commitments thereunder.
Most of the Company's bank credit arrangements contain covenants that limit the Company's debt level to 65% of total capitalization, as defined in the arrangements. For purposes of calculating these covenants, any long-term notes payable to affiliated trusts are excluded from debt but included in capitalization. At December 31, 2017, the Company was in compliance with the debt limit covenants.
A portion of the unused credit with banks is allocated to provide liquidity support to the Company's pollution control revenue bonds and commercial paper programs. The amount of variable rate pollution control revenue bonds outstanding requiring liquidity support was $854 million as of December 31, 2017. In addition, at December 31, 2017, the Company had $120 million of fixed rate pollution control revenue bonds outstanding that were required to be remarketed within the next 12 months.
The Company borrows through commercial paper programs that have the liquidity support of the committed bank credit arrangements described above. The Company may also make short-term borrowings through various other arrangements with

NOTES (continued)
Alabama Power Company 2017 Annual Report

banks. At December 31, 2017, the Company had $3 million in short-term debt outstanding and none at December 31, 2016. At December 31, 2017, the Company had regulatory approval to have outstanding up to $2.0 billion of short-term borrowings.
7. COMMITMENTS
Fuel and Purchased Power Agreements
To supply a portion of the fuel requirements of its generating plants, the Company has entered into various long-term commitments for the procurement and delivery of fossil and nuclear fuel which are not recognized on the balance sheets. In 2017, 2016, and 2015, the Company incurred fuel expense of $1.2 billion, $1.3 billion, and $1.3 billion, respectively, the majority of which was purchased under long-term commitments. The Company expects that a substantial amount of its future fuel needs will continue to be purchased under long-term commitments.
In addition, the Company has entered into various long-term commitments for the purchase of capacity and electricity, some of which are accounted for as operating leases. Total capacity expense under PPAs accounted for as operating leases was $41 million, $42 million, and $38 million for 2017, 2016, and 2015, respectively. Total estimated minimum long-term obligations at December 31, 2017 were as follows:
 
Operating
Lease
PPAs
 (in millions)
2018$41
201943
202044
202146
202247
2023 and thereafter
Total commitments$221
SCS may enter into various types of wholesale energy and natural gas contracts acting as an agent for the Company and all of the other traditional electric operating companies and Southern Power. Under these agreements, each of the traditional electric operating companies and Southern Power may be jointly and severally liable. Accordingly, Southern Company has entered into keep-well agreements with the Company and each of the other traditional electric operating companies to ensure the Company will not subsidize or be responsible for any costs, losses, liabilities, or damages resulting from the inclusion of Southern Power as a contracting party under these agreements.
Operating Leases
The Company has entered into operating leases with Southern Linc and third parties for the use of cellular tower space. Substantially all of these agreements have initial terms ranging from five to 10 years and renewal options of up to 20 years. The Company has entered into rental agreements for towers, coal railcars, vehicles, and other equipment with various terms and expiration dates. Total rent expense under these agreements was $25 million in 2017, $18 million in 2016, and $19 million in 2015. Of these amounts, $11 million, $14 million, and $13 million for 2017, 2016, and 2015, respectively, relate to the railcar leases and was recovered through the Company's Rate ECR. The Company includes any step rents, fixed escalations, and lease concessions in its computation of minimum lease payments.

NOTES (continued)
Alabama Power Company 2017 Annual Report

As of December 31, 2017, estimated minimum lease payments under operating leases were as follows:
 
Minimum Lease Payments(a)
 
Affiliate Operating Leases(b)
 Railcars Vehicles & Other Total
   (in millions)    
2018$8
 $7
 $6
 $21
201910
 7
 5
 22
20208
 7
 3
 18
20217
 6
 1
 14
20225
 5
 
 10
2023 and thereafter16
 4
 
 20
Total$54
 $36
 $15
 $105
(a)Minimum lease payments have not been reduced by minimum sublease rentals of $3 million in the future.
(b)Includes operating leases for cellular tower space.
In addition to the above rental commitments payments, the Company has potential obligations upon expiration of certain railcar leases with respect to the residual value of the leased property. These leases have terms expiring through 2023 with maximum obligations under these leases of $12 million in 2023. There are no obligations under these leases through 2022. At the termination of the leases, the lessee may either exercise its purchase option, or the property can be sold to a third party. The Company expects that the fair market value of the leased property would substantially reduce or eliminate the Company's payments under the residual value obligations.
Guarantees
The Company has guaranteed the obligation of SEGCO for $25 million of pollution control revenue bonds issued in 2001, which mature in June 2019, and also $100 million of senior notes issued in 2013, which mature in December 2018. Georgia Power has agreed to reimburse the Company for the pro rata portion of such obligations corresponding to Georgia Power's then proportionate ownership of SEGCO's stock if the Company is called upon to make such payment under its guarantee. See Note 4 for additional information.
8. STOCK COMPENSATION
Stock-Based Compensation
Stock-based compensation primarily in the form of Southern Company performance share units and restricted stock units may be granted through the Omnibus Incentive Compensation Plan to a large segment of the Company's employees ranging from line management to executives. In 2015 and 2016, stock-based compensation consisted exclusively of performance share units. Beginning in 2017, stock-based compensation granted to employees includes restricted stock units in addition to performance share units. Prior to 2015, stock-based compensation also included stock options. As of December 31, 2017, there were 793 current and former employees participating in the stock option, performance share unit, and restricted stock unit programs.
Performance Share Units
Performance share units granted to employees vest at the end of a three-year performance period. All unvested performance share units vest immediately upon a change in control where Southern Company is not the surviving corporation. Shares of Southern Company common stock are delivered to employees at the end of the performance period with the number of shares issued ranging from 0% to 200% of the target number of performance share units granted, based on achievement of the performance goals established by the Compensation Committee of the Southern Company Board of Directors.
Southern Company issues performance share units with performance goals based on three performance goals to employees. These include performance share units with performance goals based on the total shareholder return (TSR) for Southern Company common stock during the three-year performance period as compared to a group of industry peers, performance share units with performance goals based on Southern Company's cumulative earnings per share (EPS) over the performance period, and performance share units with performance goals based on Southern Company's equity-weighted ROE over the performance period.

NOTES (continued)
Alabama Power Company 2017 Annual Report

In 2015 and 2016, the EPS-based and ROE-based awards each represented 25% of the total target grant date fair value of the performance share unit awards granted. The remaining 50% of the total target grant date fair value consisted of TSR-based awards. Beginning in 2017, the total target grant date fair value of the stock compensation awards granted was comprised 20% each of EPS-based awards and ROE-based awards and 30% each of TSR-based awards and restricted stock units.
The fair value of TSR-based performance share unit awards is determined as of the grant date using a Monte Carlo simulation model to estimate the TSR of Southern Company's common stock among the industry peers over the performance period. The Company recognizes compensation expense on a straight-line basis over the three-year performance period without remeasurement.
The fair values of the EPS-based awards and the ROE-based awards are based on the closing stock price of Southern Company common stock on the date of the grant. Compensation expense for the EPS-based and ROE-based awards is generally recognized ratably over the three-year performance period initially assuming a 100% payout at the end of the performance period. Employees become immediately vested in the TSR-based performance share units, along with the EPS-based and ROE-based awards, upon retirement. As a result, compensation expense for employees that are retirement eligible at the grant date is recognized immediately while compensation expense for employees that become retirement eligible during the vesting period is recognized over the period from grant date to the date of retirement eligibility. The expected payout related to the EPS-based and ROE-based awards is reevaluated annually with expense recognized to date increased or decreased based on the number of shares currently expected to be issued. Unlike the TSR-based awards, the compensation expense ultimately recognized for the EPS-based awards and the ROE-based awards will be based on the actual number of shares issued at the end of the performance period.
For the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016, and 2015, employees of the Company were granted performance share units of 135,502, 249,065, and 214,709, respectively. The weighted average grant-date fair value of TSR-based performance share units granted during 2017, 2016, and 2015, determined using a Monte Carlo simulation model to estimate the TSR of Southern Company's stock among the industry peers over the performance period, was $49.07, $45.15, and $46.42, respectively. The weighted average grant-date fair value of both EPS-based and ROE-based performance share units granted during 2017, 2016, and 2015 was $49.21, $48.86, and $47.78, respectively.
For the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016, and 2015, total compensation cost for performance share units recognized in income was $9 million, $15 million, and $13 million, respectively, with the related tax benefit also recognized in income of $4 million, $6 million, and $5 million, respectively. The compensation cost related to the grant of Southern Company performance share units to the Company's employees is recognized in the Company's financial statements with a corresponding credit to equity, representing a capital contribution from Southern Company. As of December 31, 2017, $2 million of total unrecognized compensation cost related to performance share award units will be recognized over a weighted-average period of approximately 21 months.
Restricted Stock Units
Beginning in 2017, stock-based compensation granted to employees included restricted stock units in addition to performance share units. One-third of the restricted stock units granted to employees vest each year throughout a three-year service period. All unvested restricted stock units vest immediately upon a change in control where Southern Company is not the surviving corporation. Shares of Southern Company common stock are delivered to employees at the end of the vesting period.
The fair value of restricted stock units is based on the closing stock price of Southern Company common stock on the date of the grant. Since one-third of the restricted stock units vest each year throughout a three-year service period, compensation expense for restricted stock unit awards is generally recognized over the corresponding one-, two-, or three-year period. Employees become immediately vested in the restricted stock units upon retirement. As a result, compensation expense for employees that are retirement eligible at the grant date is recognized immediately while compensation expense for employees that become retirement eligible during the vesting period is recognized over the period from grant date to the date of retirement eligibility.
For the year ended December 31, 2017, employees of the Company were granted 58,001 restricted stock units. The weighted average grant-date fair value of restricted stock units granted during 2017 was $49.21.
For the year ended December 31, 2017, total compensation cost for restricted stock units recognized in income was $3 million with the related tax benefit also recognized in income of $1 million. As of December 31, 2017, total unrecognized compensation cost related to restricted stock units was immaterial.
Stock Options
In 2015, Southern Company discontinued the granting of stock options. Stock options expire no later than 10 years after the grant date and the latest possible exercise will occur no later than November 2024.

NOTES (continued)
Alabama Power Company 2017 Annual Report

The compensation cost related to the grant of Southern Company stock options to the Company's employees is recognized in the Company's financial statements with a corresponding credit to equity, representing a capital contribution from Southern Company. Compensation cost and related tax benefits recognized in the Company's financial statements were not material for any year presented. As of December 31, 2017, all compensation cost related to stock option awards has been recognized.
The total intrinsic value of options exercised during the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016, and 2015 was $12 million, $21 million, and $8 million, respectively. No cash proceeds are received by the Company upon the exercise of stock options. The actual tax benefit realized by the Company for the tax deductions from stock option exercises totaled $5 million, $8 million, and $3 million for the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016, and 2015, respectively. Prior to the adoption of ASU 2016-09 in 2016, the excess tax benefits related to the exercise of stock options were recognized in the Company's financial statements with a credit to equity. Upon the adoption of ASU 2016-09, beginning in 2016, all tax benefits related to the exercise of stock options are recognized in income. As of December 31, 2017, the aggregate intrinsic value for the options outstanding and exercisable was $17 million.
9. NUCLEAR INSURANCE
Under the Price-Anderson Amendments Act (Act), the Company maintains agreements of indemnity with the NRC that, together with private insurance, cover third-party liability arising from any nuclear incident occurring at Plant Farley. The Act provides funds up to $13.4 billion for public liability claims that could arise from a single nuclear incident. Plant Farley is insured against this liability to a maximum of $450 million by American Nuclear Insurers (ANI), with the remaining coverage provided by a mandatory program of deferred premiums that could be assessed, after a nuclear incident, against all owners of commercial nuclear reactors. The Company could be assessed up to $127 million per incident for each licensed reactor it operates but not more than an aggregate of $19 million per incident to be paid in a calendar year for each reactor. Such maximum assessment, excluding any applicable state premium taxes, for the Company is $255 million per incident but not more than an aggregate of $38 million to be paid for each incident in any one year. Both the maximum assessment per reactor and the maximum yearly assessment are adjusted for inflation at least every five years. The next scheduled adjustment is due no later than September 10, 2018.
The Company is a member of Nuclear Electric Insurance Limited (NEIL), a mutual insurer established to provide property damage insurance in an amount up to $1.5 billion for members' operating nuclear generating facilities. Additionally, the Company has NEIL policies that currently provide decontamination, excess property insurance, and premature decommissioning coverage up to $1.25 billion for nuclear losses and policies providing coverage up to $750 million for non-nuclear losses in excess of the $1.5 billion primary coverage.
NEIL also covers the additional costs that would be incurred in obtaining replacement power during a prolonged accidental outage at a member's nuclear plant. Members can purchase this coverage, subject to a deductible waiting period of up to 26 weeks, with a maximum per occurrence per unit limit of $490 million. After the deductible period, weekly indemnity payments would be received until either the unit is operational or until the limit is exhausted. The Company purchases limits based on the projected full cost of replacement power and has elected a 12-week deductible waiting period.
Under each of the NEIL policies, members are subject to assessments each year if losses exceed the accumulated funds available to the insurer. The maximum annual assessments for the Company as of December 31, 2017 under the NEIL policies would be $55 million.
Claims resulting from terrorist acts are covered under both the ANI and NEIL policies (subject to normal policy limits). The aggregate, however, that NEIL will pay for all claims resulting from terrorist acts in any 12-month period is $3.2 billion plus such additional amounts NEIL can recover through reinsurance, indemnity, or other sources.
For all on-site property damage insurance policies for commercial nuclear power plants, the NRC requires that the proceeds of such policies shall be dedicated first for the sole purpose of placing the reactor in a safe and stable condition after an accident. Any remaining proceeds are to be applied next toward the costs of decontamination and debris removal operations ordered by the NRC, and any further remaining proceeds are to be paid either to the Company or to its debt trustees as may be appropriate under the policies and applicable trust indentures. In the event of a loss, the amount of insurance available might not be adequate to cover property damage and other expenses incurred. Uninsured losses and other expenses, to the extent not recovered from customers, would be borne by the Company and could have a material effect on the Company's financial condition and results of operations.
All retrospective assessments, whether generated for liability, property, or replacement power, may be subject to applicable state premium taxes.

NOTES (continued)
Alabama Power Company 2017 Annual Report

10. FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTS
Fair value measurements are based on inputs of observable and unobservable market data that a market participant would use in pricing the asset or liability. The use of observable inputs is maximized where available and the use of unobservable inputs is minimized for fair value measurement and reflects a three-tier fair value hierarchy that prioritizes inputs to valuation techniques used for fair value measurement.
Level 1 consists of observable market data in an active market for identical assets or liabilities.
Level 2 consists of observable market data, other than that included in Level 1, that is either directly or indirectly observable.
Level 3 consists of unobservable market data. The input may reflect the assumptions of the Company of what a market participant would use in pricing an asset or liability. If there is little available market data, then the Company's own assumptions are the best available information.
In the case of multiple inputs being used in a fair value measurement, the lowest level input that is significant to the fair value measurement represents the level in the fair value hierarchy in which the fair value measurement is reported.
As of December 31, 2017, assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis during the period, together with their associated level of the fair value hierarchy, were as follows:
 Fair Value Measurements Using  
 Quoted Prices in Active Markets for Identical Assets Significant Other Observable Inputs Significant Unobservable Inputs Net Asset Value as a Practical Expedient  
As of December 31, 2017:(Level 1) (Level 2) (Level 3) (NAV) Total
 (in millions)
Assets:         
Energy-related derivatives$
 $4
 $
 $
 $4
Nuclear decommissioning trusts:(*)
         
Domestic equity442
 81
 
 
 523
Foreign equity62
 59
 
 
 121
U.S. Treasury and government agency securities
 24
 
 
 24
Corporate bonds21
 160
 
 
 181
Mortgage and asset backed securities
 18
 
 
 18
Private equity
 
 
 29
 29
Other6
 
 
 
 6
Cash equivalents349
 
 
 
 349
Total$880
 $346
 $
 $29
 $1,255
Liabilities:         
Energy-related derivatives$
 $10
 $
 $
 $10
(*)Excludes receivables related to investment income, pending investment sales, and payables related to pending investment purchases. See Note 1 under "Nuclear Decommissioning" for additional information.

NOTES (continued)
Alabama Power Company 2017 Annual Report

As of December 31, 2016, assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis during the period, together with their associated level of the fair value hierarchy, were as follows:
 Fair Value Measurements Using  
 Quoted Prices in Active Markets for Identical Assets Significant Other Observable Inputs Significant Unobservable Inputs Net Asset Value as a Practical Expedient  
As of December 31, 2016:(Level 1) (Level 2) (Level 3) (NAV) Total
 (in millions)
Assets:         
Energy-related derivatives$
 $20
 $
 $
 $20
Nuclear decommissioning trusts:(*)


 

 

   

Domestic equity385
 72
 
 
 457
Foreign equity48
 47
 
 
 95
U.S. Treasury and government agency securities
 21
 
 
 21
Corporate bonds22
 146
 
 
 168
Mortgage and asset backed securities
 19
 
 
 19
Private equity
 
 
 20
 20
Other
 10
 
 
 10
Cash equivalents262
 
 
 
 262
Total$717
 $335
 $
 $20
 $1,072
Liabilities:         
Energy-related derivatives$
 $9
 $
 $
 $9
(*)Excludes receivables related to investment income, pending investment sales, and payables related to pending investment purchases. See Note 1 under "Nuclear Decommissioning" for additional information.
Valuation Methodologies
The energy-related derivatives primarily consist of over-the-counter financial products for natural gas and physical power products, including, from time to time, basis swaps. These are standard products used within the energy industry and are valued using the market approach. The inputs used are mainly from observable market sources, such as forward natural gas prices, power prices, implied volatility, and overnight index swap interest rates. Interest rate derivatives are also standard over-the-counter products that are valued using observable market data and assumptions commonly used by market participants. The fair value of interest rate derivatives reflects the net present value of expected payments and receipts under the swap agreement based on the market's expectation of future interest rates. Additional inputs to the net present value calculation may include the contract terms, counterparty credit risk, and occasionally, implied volatility of interest rate options. The interest rate derivatives are categorized as Level 2 under Fair Value Measurements as these inputs are based on observable data and valuations of similar instruments. See Note 11 for additional information on how these derivatives are used.
The NRC requires licensees of commissioned nuclear power reactors to establish a plan for providing reasonable assurance of funds for future decommissioning. For fair value measurements of the investments within the nuclear decommissioning trusts, external pricing vendors are designated for each asset class with each security specifically assigned a primary pricing source. For investments held within commingled funds, fair value is determined at the end of each business day through the net asset value, which is established by obtaining the underlying securities' individual prices from the primary pricing source. See Note 1 under "Nuclear Decommissioning" for additional information. A market price secured from the primary source vendor is then evaluated by management in its valuation of the assets within the trusts. As a general approach, fixed income market pricing vendors gather market data (including indices and market research reports) and integrate relative credit information, observed market movements, and sector news into proprietary pricing models, pricing systems, and mathematical tools. Dealer quotes and other market information, including live trading levels and pricing analysts' judgments, are also obtained when available.

NOTES (continued)
Alabama Power Company 2017 Annual Report

As of December 31, 2017 and 2016, the fair value measurements of private equity investments held in the nuclear decommissioning trusts that are calculated at net asset value per share (or its equivalent) as a practical expedient, as well as the nature and risks of those investments, were as follows:
 
Fair
Value
 
Unfunded
Commitments
 Redemption Frequency 
Redemption
Notice Period
 (in millions)    
As of December 31, 2017$29
 $21
 Not Applicable Not Applicable
As of December 31, 2016$20
 $25
 
Not
Applicable
 Not Applicable
Private equity funds include a fund-of-funds that invests in high quality private equity funds across several market sectors, funds that invest in real estate assets, and a fund that acquires companies to create resale value. Private equity funds do not have redemption rights. Distributions from these funds will be received as the underlying investments in the funds are liquidated. Liquidations of these investments are expected to occur at various times over the next 10 years.
As of December 31, 2017 and 2016, other financial instruments for which the carrying amount did not equal fair value were as follows:
 
Carrying
Amount
 
Fair
Value
 (in millions)
Long-term debt, including securities due within one year:   
2017$7,625
 $8,305
2016$7,092
 $7,544
The fair values are determined using Level 2 measurements and are based on quoted market prices for the same or similar issues or on the current rates available to the Company.
11. DERIVATIVES
The Company is exposed to market risks, including commodity price risk and interest rate risk. To manage the volatility attributable to these exposures, the Company nets its exposures, where possible, to take advantage of natural offsets and enters into various derivative transactions for the remaining exposures pursuant to the Company's policies in areas such as counterparty exposure and risk management practices. The Company's policy is that derivatives are to be used primarily for hedging purposes and mandates strict adherence to all applicable risk management policies. Derivative positions are monitored using techniques including, but not limited to, market valuation, value at risk, stress testing, and sensitivity analysis. Derivative instruments are recognized at fair value in the balance sheets as either assets or liabilities and are presented on a net basis. See Note 10 for additional information. In the statements of cash flows, the cash impacts of settled energy-related and interest rate derivatives are recorded as operating activities.
Energy-Related Derivatives
The Company enters into energy-related derivatives to hedge exposures to electricity, gas, and other fuel price changes. However, due to cost-based rate regulations and other various cost recovery mechanisms, the Company has limited exposure to market volatility in energy-related commodity prices. The Company manages fuel-hedging programs, implemented per the guidelines of the Alabama PSC, through the use of financial derivative contracts, which is expected to continue to mitigate price volatility.
Energy-related derivative contracts are accounted for under one of two methods:
Regulatory Hedges – Energy-related derivative contracts which are designated as regulatory hedges relate primarily to the Company's fuel-hedging programs, where gains and losses are initially recorded as regulatory liabilities and assets, respectively, and then are included in fuel expense as the underlying fuel is used in operations and ultimately recovered through the energy cost recovery clause.
Not Designated – Gains and losses on energy-related derivative contracts that are not designated or fail to qualify as hedges are recognized in the statements of income as incurred.

NOTES (continued)
Alabama Power Company 2017 Annual Report

Some energy-related derivative contracts require physical delivery as opposed to financial settlement, and this type of derivative is both common and prevalent within the electric industry. When an energy-related derivative contract is settled physically, any cumulative unrealized gain or loss is reversed and the contract price is recognized in the respective line item representing the actual price of the underlying goods being delivered.
At December 31, 2017, the net volume of energy-related derivative contracts for natural gas positions totaled 69 million mmBtu for the Company, with the longest hedge date of 2020 over which it is hedging its exposure to the variability in future cash flows for forecasted transactions.
In addition to the volume discussed above, the Company enters into physical natural gas supply contracts that provide the option to sell back excess gas due to operational constraints. The expected volume of natural gas subject to such a feature is 5 million mmBtu.
Interest Rate Derivatives
The Company may also enter into interest rate derivatives to hedge exposure to changes in interest rates. Derivatives related to existing variable rate securities or forecasted transactions are accounted for as cash flow hedges where the effective portion of the derivatives' fair value gains or losses is recorded in OCI and is reclassified into earnings at the same time the hedged transactions affect earnings. The derivatives employed as hedging instruments are structured to minimize ineffectiveness, which is recorded directly to earnings.
At December 31, 2017, there were no interest rate derivatives outstanding.
The estimated pre-tax losses related to interest rate derivatives that will be reclassified from accumulated OCI to interest expense for the 12-month period ending December 31, 2018 are $6 million. The Company has deferred gains and losses that are expected to be amortized into earnings through 2035.
Derivative Financial Statement Presentation and Amounts
The Company enters into energy-related and interest rate derivative contracts that may contain provisions that permit intra-contract netting of derivative receivables and payables for routine billing and offsets related to events of default and settlements. Fair value amounts of derivative assets and liabilities on the balance sheets are presented net to the extent that there are netting arrangements or similar agreements with the counterparties.
At December 31, 2017 and 2016, the fair value of energy-related derivatives was reflected on the balance sheets as follows:
 20172016
Derivative Category and Balance Sheet LocationAssetsLiabilitiesAssetsLiabilities
 (in millions)
Derivatives designated as hedging instruments for regulatory purposes    
Energy-related derivatives:    
Other current assets/Other current liabilities$2
$6
$13
$5
Other deferred charges and assets/Other deferred credits and liabilities2
4
7
4
Total derivatives designated as hedging instruments for regulatory purposes$4
$10
$20
$9
Gross amounts recognized$4
$10
$20
$9
Gross amounts offset$(4)$(4)$(8)$(8)
Net amounts recognized in the Balance Sheets$
$6
$12
$1
Energy-related derivatives not designated as hedging instruments were immaterial on the balance sheets for 2017 and 2016.

NOTES (continued)
Alabama Power Company 2017 Annual Report

At December 31, 2017 and 2016, the pre-tax effect of unrealized derivative gains (losses) arising from energy-related derivatives designated as regulatory hedging instruments and deferred were as follows:
 Unrealized Losses Unrealized Gains
Derivative Category
Balance Sheet
Location
2017 2016 
Balance Sheet
Location
2017 2016
  (in millions)  (in millions)
Energy-related derivatives:Other regulatory assets, current$(4) $(1) Other regulatory liabilities, current$1
 $8
 Other regulatory assets, deferred(3) 
 Other regulatory liabilities, deferred
 4
Total energy-related derivative gains (losses) $(7) $(1)  $1
 $12
For the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016, and 2015, the pre-tax effect of interest rate derivatives designated as cash flow hedging instruments on the statements of income was as follows:
Derivatives in Cash Flow Hedging Relationships
Gain (Loss) Recognized in
OCI on Derivative
(Effective Portion)
 Gain (Loss) Reclassified from Accumulated OCI into Income (Effective Portion)
  Amount
Derivative Category2017 2016 2015 
Statements of Income
Location
2017 2016 2015
 (in millions)  (in millions)
Interest rate derivatives$
 $(3) $(7) Interest expense, net of amounts capitalized$(6) $(6) $(3)
There was no material ineffectiveness recorded in earnings for any period presented.
The pre-tax effect of energy-related derivatives not designated as hedging instruments on the statements of income was not material for any year presented.
Contingent Features
The Company does not have any credit arrangements that would require material changes in payment schedules or terminations as a result of a credit rating downgrade. There are certain derivatives that could require collateral, but not accelerated payment, in the event of various credit rating changes of certain affiliated companies.
At December 31, 2017, the fair value of derivative liabilities with contingent features was $1 million. However, because of joint and several liability features underlying these derivatives, the maximum potential collateral requirements arising from the credit-risk related contingent features, at a rating below BBB- and/or Baa3, were $12 million, and include certain agreements that could require collateral in the event that one or more Southern Company system power pool participants has a credit rating change to below investment grade.
Generally, collateral may be provided by a Southern Company guaranty, letter of credit, or cash. If collateral is required, fair value amounts recognized for the right to reclaim cash collateral or the obligation to return cash collateral are not offset against fair value amounts recognized for derivatives executed with the same counterparty.
The Company maintains accounts with certain regional transmission organizations to facilitate financial derivative transactions. Based on the value of the positions in these accounts and the associated margin requirements, the Company may be required to post collateral. At December 31, 2017, the Company's collateral posted in these accounts was not material.
The Company is exposed to losses related to financial instruments in the event of counterparties' nonperformance. The Company only enters into agreements and material transactions with counterparties that have investment grade credit ratings by Moody's and S&P or with counterparties who have posted collateral to cover potential credit exposure. The Company has also established risk management policies and controls to determine and monitor the creditworthiness of counterparties in order to mitigate the Company's exposure to counterparty credit risk. Therefore, the Company does not anticipate a material adverse effect on the financial statements as a result of counterparty nonperformance.

NOTES (continued)
Alabama Power Company 2017 Annual Report

12. QUARTERLY FINANCIAL INFORMATION (UNAUDITED)
Summarized quarterly financial information for 2017 and 2016 is as follows:
Quarter Ended
Operating
Revenues
 
Operating
Income
 Net Income After Dividends on Preferred and Preference Stock
 (in millions)
March 2017$1,382
 $376
 $174
June 20171,484
 454
 230
September 20171,740
 616
 325
December 20171,433
 268
 119
      
March 2016$1,331
 $333
 $156
June 20161,444
 430
 213
September 20161,785
 650
 351
December 20161,329
 252
 102
The Company's business is influenced by seasonal weather conditions.


SELECTED FINANCIAL AND OPERATING DATA 2013-2017
Alabama Power Company 2017 Annual Report
 2017
 2016
 2015
 2014
 2013
Operating Revenues (in millions)$6,039
 $5,889
 $5,768
 $5,942
 $5,618
Net Income After Dividends
on Preferred and Preference Stock (in millions)
$848
 $822
 $785
 $761
 $712
Cash Dividends on Common Stock (in millions)$714
 $765
 $571
 $550
 $644
Return on Average Common Equity (percent)12.89
 13.34
 13.37
 13.52
 13.07
Total Assets (in millions)(a)(b)
$23,864
 $22,516
 $21,721
 $20,493
 $19,185
Gross Property Additions (in millions)$1,949
 $1,338
 $1,492
 $1,543
 $1,204
Capitalization (in millions):         
Common stock equity$6,829
 $6,323
 $5,992
 $5,752
 $5,502
Preference stock
 196
 196
 343
 343
Redeemable preferred stock291
 85
 85
 342
 342
Long-term debt(a)
7,628
 6,535
 6,654
 6,137
 6,195
Total (excluding amounts due within one year)$14,748
 $13,139
 $12,927
 $12,574
 $12,382
Capitalization Ratios (percent):         
Common stock equity46.3
 48.1
 46.4
 45.8
 44.4
Preference stock
 1.5
 1.5
 2.7
 2.8
Redeemable preferred stock2.0
 0.7
 0.7
 2.7
 2.7
Long-term debt(a)
51.7
 49.7
 51.4
 48.8
 50.1
Total (excluding amounts due within one year)100.0
 100.0
 100.0
 100.0
 100.0
Customers (year-end):         
Residential1,268,271
 1,262,752
 1,253,875
 1,247,061
 1,241,998
Commercial199,840
 199,146
 197,920
 197,082
 196,209
Industrial6,171
 6,090
 6,056
 6,032
 5,851
Other766
 762
 757
 753
 751
Total1,475,048
 1,468,750
 1,458,608
 1,450,928
 1,444,809
Employees (year-end)6,613
 6,805
 6,986
 6,935
 6,896
(a)A reclassification of debt issuance costs from Total Assets to Long-term debt of $40 million and $38 million is reflected for years 2014 and 2013, respectively, in accordance with new accounting standards adopted in 2015 and applied retrospectively.
(b)A reclassification of deferred tax assets from Total Assets of $20 million and $27 million is reflected for years 2014 and 2013, respectively, in accordance with new accounting standards adopted in 2015 and applied retrospectively.

























SELECTED FINANCIAL AND OPERATING DATA 2013-2017 (continued)
Alabama Power Company 2017 Annual Report
 2017
 2016
 2015
 2014
 2013
Operating Revenues (in millions):
         
Residential$2,302
 $2,322
 $2,207
 $2,209
 $2,079
Commercial1,649
 1,627
 1,564
 1,533
 1,477
Industrial1,477
 1,416
 1,436
 1,480
 1,369
Other30
 (43) 27
 27
 27
Total retail5,458
 5,322
 5,234
 5,249
 4,952
Wholesale — non-affiliates276
 283
 241
 281
 248
Wholesale — affiliates97
 69
 84
 189
 212
Total revenues from sales of electricity5,831
 5,674
 5,559
 5,719
 5,412
Other revenues208
 215
 209
 223
 206
Total$6,039
 $5,889
 $5,768
 $5,942
 $5,618
Kilowatt-Hour Sales (in millions):
         
Residential17,219
 18,343
 18,082
 18,726
 17,920
Commercial13,606
 14,091
 14,102
 14,118
 13,892
Industrial22,687
 22,310
 23,380
 23,799
 22,904
Other198
 208
 201
 211
 211
Total retail53,710
 54,952
 55,765
 56,854
 54,927
Wholesale — non-affiliates5,415
 5,744
 3,567
 3,588
 3,711
Wholesale — affiliates4,166
 3,177
 4,515
 6,713
 7,672
Total63,291
 63,873
 63,847
 67,155
 66,310
Average Revenue Per Kilowatt-Hour (cents):
         
Residential13.37
 12.66
 12.21
 11.80
 11.60
Commercial12.12
 11.55
 11.09
 10.86
 10.63
Industrial6.51
 6.35
 6.14
 6.22
 5.98
Total retail10.16
 9.68
 9.39
 9.23
 9.02
Wholesale3.89
 3.95
 4.02
 4.56
 4.04
Total sales9.21
 8.88
 8.71
 8.52
 8.16
Residential Average Annual
Kilowatt-Hour Use Per Customer
13,601
 14,568
 14,454
 15,051
 14,451
Residential Average Annual
Revenue Per Customer
$1,819
 $1,844
 $1,764
 $1,775
 $1,676
Plant Nameplate Capacity
Ratings (year-end) (megawatts)
11,797
 11,797
 11,797
 12,222
 12,222
Maximum Peak-Hour Demand (megawatts):
         
Winter10,513
 10,282
 12,162
 11,761
 9,347
Summer10,711
 10,932
 11,292
 11,054
 10,692
Annual Load Factor (percent)
63.5
 63.5
 58.4
 61.4
 64.9
Plant Availability (percent):
         
Fossil-steam82.8
 83.0
 81.5
 82.5
 87.3
Nuclear97.6
 88.0
 92.1
 93.3
 90.7
Source of Energy Supply (percent):
         
Coal44.8
 47.1
 49.1
 49.0
 50.0
Nuclear22.2
 20.3
 21.3
 20.7
 20.3
Hydro5.4
 4.8
 5.6
 5.5
 8.1
Gas18.1
 17.1
 14.6
 15.4
 15.7
Purchased power —         
From non-affiliates4.6
 4.8
 4.4
 3.6
 2.9
From affiliates4.9
 5.9
 5.0
 5.8
 3.0
Total100.0
 100.0
 100.0
 100.0
 100.0


GEORGIA POWER COMPANY
FINANCIAL SECTION


MANAGEMENT'S REPORT ON INTERNAL CONTROL OVER FINANCIAL REPORTING
Georgia Power Company 2017 Annual Report
The management of Georgia Power Company (the Company) is responsible for establishing and maintaining an adequate system of internal control over financial reporting as required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and as defined in Exchange Act Rule 13a-15(f). A control system can provide only reasonable, not absolute, assurance that the objectives of the control system are met.
Under management's supervision, an evaluation of the design and effectiveness of the Company's internal control over financial reporting was conducted based on the framework in Internal Control—Integrated Framework (2013) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission. Based on this evaluation, management concluded that the Company's internal control over financial reporting was effective as of December 31, 2017.

/s/ W. Paul Bowers
W. Paul Bowers
Chairman, President, and Chief Executive Officer

/s/ Xia Liu
Xia Liu
Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer, and Treasurer
February 20, 2018


REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
To the stockholder and the Board of Directors of Georgia Power Company
Opinion on the Financial Statements
We have audited the accompanying balance sheets and statements of capitalization of Georgia Power Company (the Company) (a wholly-owned subsidiary of The Southern Company) as of December 31, 2017 and 2016, the related statements of income, comprehensive income, common stockholder's equity, and cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2017, and the related notes (collectively referred to as the "financial statements"). In our opinion, the financial statements (pages II-270 to II-321) present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of the Company as of December 31, 2017 and 2016, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2017, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.
Basis for Opinion
These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Company's financial statements based on our audits. We are a public accounting firm registered with the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (PCAOB) and are required to be independent with respect to the Company in accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.
We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement, whether due to error or fraud. The Company is not required to have, nor were we engaged to perform, an audit of its internal control over financial reporting. As part of our audits, we are required to obtain an understanding of internal control over financial reporting but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Company's internal control over financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion.
Our audits included performing procedures to assess the risks of material misstatement of the financial statements, whether due to error or fraud, and performing procedures that respond to those risks. Such procedures included examining, on a test basis, evidence regarding the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. Our audits also included evaluating the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the financial statements. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
/s/ Deloitte & Touche LLP
Atlanta, Georgia
February 20, 2018
We have served as the Company's auditor since 2002.

DEFINITIONS
TermMeaning
2013 ARPAlternative Rate Plan approved by the Georgia PSC in 2013 for Georgia Power for the years 2014 through 2016 and subsequently extended through 2019
AFUDCAllowance for funds used during construction
Alabama PowerAlabama Power Company
AROAsset retirement obligation
ASCAccounting Standards Codification
ASUAccounting Standards Update
Bechtel                                                                Bechtel Power Corporation
CCRCoal combustion residuals
Clean Air ActClean Air Act Amendments of 1990
CO2
Carbon dioxide
Contractor Settlement AgreementThe December 31, 2015 agreement between Westinghouse and the Vogtle Owners resolving disputes between the Vogtle Owners and the EPC Contractor under the Vogtle 3 and 4 Agreement
CWIPConstruction work in progress
DOEU.S. Department of Energy
Eligible Project CostsCertain costs of construction relating to Plant Vogtle Units 3 and 4 that are eligible for financing under the loan guarantee program established under Title XVII of the Energy Policy Act of 2005
EPAU.S. Environmental Protection Agency
EPC ContractorWestinghouse and its affiliate, WECTEC Global Project Services Inc.; the former engineering, procurement, and construction contractor for Plant Vogtle Units 3 and 4
FASBFinancial Accounting Standards Board
FERCFederal Energy Regulatory Commission
FFBFederal Financing Bank
GAAPU.S. generally accepted accounting principles
Gulf PowerGulf Power Company
Interim Assessment AgreementAgreement entered into by the Vogtle Owners and the EPC Contractor to allow construction to continue after the EPC Contractor's bankruptcy filing
IRSInternal Revenue Service
ITCInvestment tax credit
KWHKilowatt-hour
LIBORLondon Interbank Offered Rate
Loan Guarantee AgreementLoan guarantee agreement entered into by Georgia Power with the DOE in 2014, under which the proceeds of borrowings may be used to reimburse Georgia Power for Eligible Project Costs incurred in connection with its construction of Plant Vogtle Units 3 and 4
LTSALong-term service agreement
Mississippi PowerMississippi Power Company
mmBtuMillion British thermal units
Moody'sMoody's Investors Service, Inc.
MWMegawatt
NCCRNuclear Construction Cost Recovery
NOX
Nitrogen oxide
NRCU.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission
OCIOther comprehensive income

DEFINITIONS
(continued)
TermMeaning
power poolThe operating arrangement whereby the integrated generating resources of the traditional electric operating companies and Southern Power (excluding subsidiaries) are subject to joint commitment and dispatch in order to serve their combined load obligations
PPAPower purchase agreement
PSCPublic Service Commission
PTCProduction tax credit
ROEReturn on equity
S&PS&P Global Ratings, a division of S&P Global Inc.
SCSSouthern Company Services, Inc. (the Southern Company system service company)
SECU.S. Securities and Exchange Commission
SEGCOSouthern Electric Generating Company
SO2
Sulfur dioxide
Southern CompanyThe Southern Company
Southern Company GasSouthern Company Gas and its subsidiaries
Southern Company systemSouthern Company, the traditional electric operating companies, Southern Power, Southern Company Gas (as of July 1, 2016), SEGCO, Southern Nuclear, SCS, Southern Linc, PowerSecure, Inc. (as of May 9, 2016), and other subsidiaries
Southern LincSouthern Communications Services, Inc.
Southern NuclearSouthern Nuclear Operating Company, Inc.
Southern PowerSouthern Power Company and its subsidiaries
Tax Reform LegislationThe Tax Cuts and Jobs Act, which was signed into law on December 22, 2017 and became effective on January 1, 2018
ToshibaToshiba Corporation, parent company of Westinghouse
Toshiba GuaranteeCertain payment obligations of the EPC Contractor guaranteed by Toshiba
traditional electric operating companiesAlabama Power, Georgia Power Company, Gulf Power, and Mississippi Power
VCMVogtle Construction Monitoring
Vogtle 3 and 4 AgreementAgreement entered into with the EPC Contractor in 2008 by Georgia Power, acting for itself and as agent for the Vogtle Owners, pursuant to which the EPC Contractor agreed to design, engineer, procure, construct, and test Plant Vogtle Units 3 and 4
Vogtle OwnersGeorgia Power, Oglethorpe Power Corporation, the Municipal Electric Authority of Georgia, and the City of Dalton, Georgia, an incorporated municipality in the State of Georgia acting by and through its Board of Water, Light, and Sinking Fund Commissioners
Vogtle Services AgreementThe June 9, 2017 services agreement between the Vogtle Owners and the EPC Contractor, as amended and restated on July 20, 2017, for the EPC Contractor to transition construction management of Plant Vogtle Units 3 and 4 to Southern Nuclear and to provide ongoing design, engineering, and procurement services to Southern Nuclear
WestinghouseWestinghouse Electric Company LLC

MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF(continued)
Southern Company and Subsidiary Companies 2018 Annual Report


Programs and Capital Projects" for additional information regarding infrastructure improvement programs at the natural gas distribution utilities.
The Southern Company system's construction program is currently estimated to total approximately $8.0 billion, $7.7 billion, $6.7 billion, $6.3 billion, and $6.0 billion for 2019, 2020, 2021, 2022, and 2023, respectively. The largest construction project currently underway in the Southern Company system is Plant Vogtle Units 3 and 4 (45.7% ownership interest by Georgia Power in the two units, each with approximately 1,100 MWs). See FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
Georgia Power Company 2017 Annual Report
OVERVIEW
Business Activities
Georgia Power Company (the Company) operates as a vertically integrated utility providing electric service to retail customers within its traditional service territory located within the State of GeorgiaLIQUIDITY – "Capital Requirements and to wholesale customers in the Southeast.
Many factors affect the opportunities, challenges, and risks of the Company's business of providing electric service. These factors include the ability to maintain a constructive regulatory environment, to maintain and grow energy sales, and to effectively manage and secure timely recovery of costs. These costs include those related to projected long-term demand growth, stringent environmental standards, reliability, fuel, capital expenditures, and restoration following major storms. The Company has various regulatory mechanisms that operate to address cost recovery. Effectively operating pursuant to these regulatory mechanisms and appropriately balancing required costs and capital expenditures with customer prices will continue to challenge the Company for the foreseeable future. The Company is required to file a base rate case with the Georgia PSC by July 1, 2019.
The Company continues to focus on several key performance indicators, including, but not limited to, customer satisfaction, plant availability, system reliability, the execution of major construction projects, and net income. The Company's financial success is directly tied to customer satisfaction. Key elements of ensuring customer satisfaction include outstanding service, high reliability, and competitive prices. Management uses customer satisfaction surveys to evaluate the Company's results and generally targets the top quartile of these surveys in measuring performance.
See RESULTS OF OPERATIONSContractual Obligations" herein for additional information on theregarding Southern Company's financial performance.capital requirements for its subsidiaries' construction programs.
Nuclear Construction
In 2009, the Georgia PSC certified construction of Plant Vogtle Units 3 and 4. Georgia Power holds a 45.7% ownership interest in Plant Vogtle Units 3 and 4. In 2012, the NRC issued the related combined construction and operating licenses, which allowed full construction of the two AP1000 nuclear units (with electric generating capacity of approximately 1,100 MWs each) and related facilities to begin. Until March 2017, construction on Plant Vogtle Units 3 and 4 continued under the Vogtle 3 and 4 Agreement, which was a substantially fixed price agreement. OnIn March 29, 2017, the EPC Contractor filed for bankruptcy protection under Chapter 11 of the U.S. Bankruptcy Code.
In connection with the EPC Contractor's bankruptcy filing, the Company,Georgia Power, acting for itself and as agent for the Vogtle Owners, entered into the Interim Assessment Agreement with the EPC Contractor to allow construction to continue. The Interim Assessment Agreement expired onin July 27, 2017 when Georgia Power, acting for itself and as agent for the other Vogtle Owners, and the EPC Contractor entered into the Vogtle Services Agreement. Under the Vogtle Services Agreement, became effective. Westinghouse provides facility design and engineering services, procurement and technical support, and staff augmentation on a time and materials cost basis. The Vogtle Services Agreement provides that it will continue until the start-up and testing of Plant Vogtle Units 3 and 4 are complete and electricity is generated and sold from both units. The Vogtle Services Agreement is terminable by the Vogtle Owners upon 30 days' written notice.
In AugustOctober 2017, following completionGeorgia Power, acting for itself and as agent for the other Vogtle Owners, executed the Bechtel Agreement, a cost reimbursable plus fee arrangement, whereby Bechtel is reimbursed for actual costs plus a base fee and an at-risk fee, which is subject to adjustment based on Bechtel's performance against cost and schedule targets. Each Vogtle Owner is severally (not jointly) liable for its proportionate share, based on its ownership interest, of comprehensiveall amounts owed to Bechtel under the Bechtel Agreement. The Vogtle Owners may terminate the Bechtel Agreement at any time for their convenience, provided that the Vogtle Owners will be required to pay amounts related to work performed prior to the termination (including the applicable portion of the base fee), certain termination-related costs, and, at certain stages of the work, the applicable portion of the at-risk fee. Bechtel may terminate the Bechtel Agreement under certain circumstances, including certain Vogtle Owner suspensions of work, certain breaches of the Bechtel Agreement by the Vogtle Owners, Vogtle Owner insolvency, and certain other events. Pursuant to the Loan Guarantee Agreement between Georgia Power and the DOE, Georgia Power is required to obtain the DOE's approval of the Bechtel Agreement prior to obtaining any further advances under the Loan Guarantee Agreement.
Cost and Schedule
Georgia Power's approximate proportionate share of the remaining estimated capital cost to complete Plant Vogtle Units 3 and 4 by the expected in-service dates of November 2021 and November 2022, respectively, is as follows:
 (in billions)
Base project capital cost forecast(a)(b)
$8.0
Construction contingency estimate0.4
Total project capital cost forecast(a)(b)
8.4
Net investment as of December 31, 2018(b)
(4.6)
Remaining estimate to complete(a)
$3.8
(a)Excludes financing costs expected to be capitalized through AFUDC of approximately $315 million.
(b)Net of $1.7 billion received from Toshiba under the Guarantee Settlement Agreement and approximately $188 million in related Customer Refunds.
Georgia Power estimates that its financing costs for construction of Plant Vogtle Units 3 and 4 will total approximately $3.1 billion, of which $1.9 billion had been incurred through December 31, 2018.
As construction continues, challenges with management of contractors, subcontractors, and vendors; labor productivity, availability, and/or cost escalation; procurement, fabrication, delivery, assembly, and/or installation and testing, including any

MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS (continued)
Southern Company and Subsidiary Companies 2018 Annual Report


required engineering changes, of plant systems, structures, and components (some of which are based on new technology that only recently began initial operation in the global nuclear industry at this scale); or other issues could arise and change the projected schedule and estimated cost. Monthly construction production targets required to maintain the current project schedule will continue to increase significantly throughout 2019. To meet these increasing monthly targets, existing craft construction productivity must improve and additional craft laborers must be retained and deployed.
Georgia Power and Southern Nuclear believe it is a leading practice in connection with a construction project of this size and complexity to periodically validate recent construction progress in comparison to the projected schedule and to verify and update quantities of commodities remaining to install, labor productivity, and forecasted staffing needs. This verification process, led by Southern Nuclear, was underway as of December 31, 2018 and is expected to be completed during the second quarter 2019. Georgia Power currently does not anticipate any material changes to the total estimated project capital cost forecast for Plant Vogtle Units 3 and 4 or the expected in-service dates of November 2021 and November 2022, respectively, resulting from this verification process. However, the ultimate impact on cost and schedule, if any, will not be known until the verification process is completed. Georgia Power is required to report the results and any project impacts to the Georgia PSC by May 15, 2019.
There have been technical and procedural challenges to the construction and licensing of Plant Vogtle Units 3 and 4 at the federal and state level and additional challenges may arise. Processes are in place that are designed to assure compliance with the requirements specified in the Westinghouse Design Control Document and the combined construction and operating licenses, including inspections by Southern Nuclear and the NRC that occur throughout construction. As a result of such compliance processes, certain license amendment requests have been filed and approved or are pending before the NRC. Various design and other licensing-based compliance matters, including the timely resolution of ITAAC and the related approvals by the NRC, may arise, which may result in additional license amendments or require other resolution. If any license amendment requests or other licensing-based compliance issues are not resolved in a timely manner, there may be delays in the project schedule that could result in increased costs.
The ultimate outcome of these matters cannot be determined at this time. However, any extension of the project schedule is currently estimated to result in additional base capital costs of approximately $50 million per month, based on Georgia Power's ownership interests, and AFUDC of approximately $12 million per month. While Georgia Power is not precluded from seeking recovery of any future capital cost forecast increase, management will ultimately determine whether or not to seek recovery. Any further changes to the capital cost forecast that are not expected to be recoverable through regulated rates will be required to be charged to income and such charges could be material.
Joint Owner Contracts
In November 2017, the Vogtle Owners entered into an amendment to their joint ownership agreements for Plant Vogtle Units 3 and 4 to provide for, among other conditions, additional Vogtle Owner approval requirements. Effective August 31, 2018, the Vogtle Owners further amended the joint ownership agreements to clarify and provide procedures for certain provisions of the joint ownership agreements related to adverse events that require the vote of the holders of at least 90% of the ownership interests in Plant Vogtle Units 3 and 4 to continue construction (as amended, and together with the November 2017 amendment, the Vogtle Joint Ownership Agreements). The Vogtle Joint Ownership Agreements also confirm that the Vogtle Owners' sole recourse against Georgia Power or Southern Nuclear for any action or inaction in connection with their performance as agent for the Vogtle Owners is limited to removal of Georgia Power and/or Southern Nuclear as agent, except in cases of willful misconduct.
As a result of the increase in the total project capital cost forecast and Georgia Power's decision not to seek rate recovery of the increase in the base capital costs as described below, the holders of at least 90% of the ownership interests in Plant Vogtle Units 3 and 4 were required to vote to continue construction. On September 26, 2018, the Vogtle Owners unanimously voted to continue construction of Plant Vogtle Units 3 and 4.
Amendments to the Vogtle Joint Ownership Agreements
In connection with the vote to continue construction, Georgia Power entered into (i) the Vogtle Owner Term Sheet with the other Vogtle Owners and MEAG's wholly-owned subsidiaries MEAG SPVJ, MEAG Power SPVM, LLC (MEAG SPVM), and MEAG Power SPVP, LLC (MEAG SPVP) to take certain actions which partially mitigate potential financial exposure for the other Vogtle Owners, including additional amendments to the Vogtle Joint Ownership Agreements and the purchase of PTCs from the other Vogtle Owners, and (ii) the MEAG Term Sheet with MEAG and MEAG SPVJ to provide funding with respect to MEAG SPVJ's ownership interest in Plant Vogtle Units 3 and 4 (Project J) under certain circumstances. On January 14, 2019, Georgia Power, MEAG, and MEAG SPVJ entered into an agreement to implement the provisions of the MEAG Term Sheet (MEAG Funding Agreement). On February 18, 2019, Georgia Power, the other Vogtle Owners, and MEAG's wholly-owned subsidiaries MEAG SPVJ, MEAG SPVM, and MEAG SPVP entered into certain amendments to the Vogtle Joint Ownership Agreements to implement the provisions of the Vogtle Owner Term Sheet (Global Amendments).

MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS (continued)
Southern Company and Subsidiary Companies 2018 Annual Report


Pursuant to the Global Amendments, and consistent with the Vogtle Owner Term Sheet, the Vogtle Joint Ownership Agreements were modified as follows: (i) each Vogtle Owner must pay its proportionate share of qualifying construction costs for Plant Vogtle Units 3 and 4 based on its ownership percentage up to the estimated cost at completion (EAC) for Plant Vogtle Units 3 and 4 which formed the basis of Georgia Power's forecast of $8.4 billion in the nineteenth VCM plus $800 million; (ii) Georgia Power will be responsible for 55.7% of actual qualifying construction costs between $800 million and $1.6 billion over the EAC in the nineteenth VCM (resulting in $80 million of potential additional costs to Georgia Power), with the remaining Vogtle Owners responsible for 44.3% of such costs pro rata in accordance with their respective ownership interests; and (iii) Georgia Power will be responsible for 65.7% of qualifying construction costs between $1.6 billion and $2.1 billion over the EAC in the nineteenth VCM (resulting in a further $100 million of potential additional costs to Georgia Power), with the remaining Vogtle Owners responsible for 34.3% of such costs pro rata in accordance with their respective ownership interests.
If the EAC is revised and exceeds the EAC in the nineteenth VCM by more than $2.1 billion, each of the other Vogtle Owners will have a one-time option at the time the project budget forecast is so revised to tender a portion of its ownership interest to Georgia Power in exchange for Georgia Power's agreement to pay 100% of such Vogtle Owner's remaining share of total construction costs in excess of the EAC in the nineteenth VCM plus $2.1 billion. In this event, Georgia Power will have the option of cancelling the project in lieu of purchasing a portion of the ownership interest of any other Vogtle Owner. If Georgia Power accepts the offer to purchase a portion of another Vogtle Owner's ownership interest in Plant Vogtle Units 3 and 4, the ownership interest(s) to be conveyed from the tendering Vogtle Owner(s) to Georgia Power will be calculated based on the proportion of the cumulative amount of construction costs paid by each such tendering Vogtle Owner(s) and by Georgia Power as of the COD of Plant Vogtle Unit 4. For purposes of this calculation, payments made by Georgia Power on behalf of another Vogtle Owner in accordance with the second and third items described in the paragraph above will be treated as payments made by the applicable Vogtle Owner.
In the event the actual costs of construction at completion of a Unit are less than the EAC reflected in the nineteenth VCM report and such Unit is placed in service in accordance with the schedule projected in the nineteenth VCM report (i.e., Plant Vogtle Unit 3 is placed in service by November 2021 or Plant Vogtle Unit 4 is placed in service by November 2022), Georgia Power will be entitled to 60.7% of the cost savings with respect to the relevant Unit and the remaining Vogtle Owners will be entitled to 39.3% of such savings on a pro rata basis in accordance with their respective ownership interests.
For purposes of the foregoing provisions, qualifying construction costs will not include costs (i) resulting from force majeure events, including governmental actions or inactions (or significant delays associated with issuance of such actions) that affect the licensing, completion, start-up, operations, or financing of Plant Vogtle Units 3 and 4, administrative proceedings or litigation regarding ITAAC or other regulatory challenges to commencement of operation of Plant Vogtle Units 3 and 4, and changes in laws or regulations governing Plant Vogtle Units 3 and 4, (ii) legal fees and legal expenses incurred due to litigation with contractors or subcontractors that are not subsidiaries or affiliates of Southern Company, and (iii) additional costs caused by requests from the Vogtle Owners other than Georgia Power, except for the exercise of a right to vote granted under the Vogtle Joint Ownership Agreements, that increase costs by $100,000 or more.
Pursuant to the Global Amendments, and consistent with the Vogtle Owner Term Sheet, the provisions of the Vogtle Joint Ownership Agreements requiring that Vogtle Owners holding 90% of the ownership interests in Plant Vogtle Units 3 and 4 vote to continue construction following certain adverse events (Project Adverse Events) were modified. Pursuant to the Global Amendments, the holders of at least 90% of the ownership interests in Plant Vogtle Units 3 and 4 must vote to continue construction if certain Project Adverse Events occur, including: (i) the bankruptcy of Toshiba; (ii) the termination or rejection in bankruptcy of certain agreements, including the Vogtle Services Agreement, the Bechtel Agreement, or the agency agreement with Southern Nuclear; (iii) Georgia Power publicly announces its intention not to submit for rate recovery any portion of its investment in Plant Vogtle Units 3 and 4 or the Georgia PSC determines that any of Georgia Power's costs relating to the construction of Plant Vogtle Units 3 and 4 will not be recovered in retail rates, excluding any additional amounts paid by Georgia Power on behalf of the other Vogtle Owners pursuant to the Global Amendments described above and the first 6% of costs during any six-month VCM reporting period that are disallowed by the Georgia PSC for recovery, or for which Georgia Power elects not to seek cost recovery, through retail rates; and (iv) an incremental extension of one year or more over the most recently approved schedule. Under the Global Amendments, Georgia Power may cancel the project at any time in its sole discretion.
In addition, pursuant to the Vogtle Joint Ownership Agreements, the required approval of holders of ownership interests in Plant Vogtle Units 3 and 4 is at least (i) 90% for a change of the primary construction contractor and (ii) 67% for material amendments to the Vogtle Services Agreement or agreements with Southern Nuclear or the primary construction contractor, including the Bechtel Agreement.
The Global Amendments provide that if the holders of at least 90% of the ownership interests fail to vote in favor of continuing the project following any future Project Adverse Event, work on Plant Vogtle Units 3 and 4 will continue for a period of 30 days if

MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS (continued)
Southern Company and Subsidiary Companies 2018 Annual Report


the holders of more than 50% of the ownership interests vote in favor of continuing construction (Majority Voting Owners). In such a case, the Vogtle Owners (i) have agreed to negotiate in good faith towards the resumption of the project, (ii) if no agreement is reached during such 30-day period, the project will be cancelled, and (iii) in the event of such a cancellation, the Majority Voting Owners will be obligated to reimburse any other Vogtle Owner for the incremental costs it incurred during such 30-day negotiation period.
Purchase of PTCs During Commercial Operation
Pursuant to the Global Amendments, and consistent with the Vogtle Owner Term Sheet, Georgia Power has agreed to purchase additional PTCs from OPC, Dalton, MEAG SPVM, MEAG SPVP, and MEAG SPVJ (to the extent any MEAG SPVJ PTC rights remain after any purchases required under the MEAG Funding Agreement as described below) at varying purchase prices dependent upon the actual cost to complete construction of Plant Vogtle Units 3 and 4 as compared to the EAC reflected in the nineteenth VCM report. The purchases are at the option of the applicable Vogtle Owner.
Potential Funding to MEAG Project J
Pursuant to the MEAG Funding Agreement, and consistent with the MEAG Term Sheet, if MEAG SPVJ is unable to make its payments due under the Vogtle Joint Ownership Agreements solely as a result of the occurrence of one of the following situations that materially impedes access to capital markets for MEAG for Project J: (i) the conduct of JEA or the City of Jacksonville, such as JEA's legal challenges of its obligations under a PPA with MEAG (PPA-J), or (ii) PPA-J is declared void by a court of competent jurisdiction or rejected by JEA under the applicable provisions of the U.S. Bankruptcy Code (each of (i) and (ii), a JEA Default), at MEAG's request, Georgia Power will purchase from MEAG SPVJ the rights to PTCs attributable to MEAG SPVJ's share of Plant Vogtle Units 3 and 4 (approximately 206 MWs) within 30 days of such request at varying prices dependent upon the stage of construction of Plant Vogtle Units 3 and 4. The aggregate purchase price of the PTCs, together with any advances made as described in the next paragraph, shall not exceed $300 million.
At the option of MEAG, as an alternative or supplement to Georgia Power's purchase of PTCs as described above, Georgia Power has agreed to provide up to $250 million in funding to MEAG for Project J in the form of advances (either advances under the Vogtle Joint Ownership Agreements or the purchase of MEAG Project J bonds, at the discretion of Georgia Power), subject to any required approvals of the Georgia PSC and the DOE.
In the event MEAG SPVJ certifies to Georgia Power that it is unable to fund its obligations under the Vogtle Joint Ownership Agreements as a result of a JEA Default and Georgia Power becomes obligated to provide funding as described above, MEAG is required to (i) assign to Georgia Power its right to vote on any future Project Adverse Event and (ii) diligently pursue JEA for its breach of PPA-J. In addition, Georgia Power agreed that it will not sue MEAG for any amounts due from MEAG SPVJ under MEAG's guarantee of MEAG SPVJ's obligations so long as MEAG SPVJ complies with the terms of the MEAG Funding Agreement as to its payment obligations and the other non-payment provisions of the Vogtle Joint Ownership Agreements.
Under the terms of the MEAG Funding Agreement, Georgia Power may cancel the project in lieu of providing funding in the form of advances or PTC purchases.
The ultimate outcome of these matters cannot be determined at this time.
Regulatory Matters
In 2009, the Georgia PSC voted to certify construction of Plant Vogtle Units 3 and 4 with a certified capital cost of $4.418 billion. In addition, in 2009 the Georgia PSC approved inclusion of the Plant Vogtle Units 3 and 4 related CWIP accounts in rate base, and the State of Georgia enacted the Georgia Nuclear Energy Financing Act, which allows Georgia Power to recover financing costs for Plant Vogtle Units 3 and 4. Financing costs are recovered on all applicable certified costs through annual adjustments to the NCCR tariff up to the certified capital cost of $4.418 billion. At December 31, 2018, Georgia Power had recovered approximately $1.9 billion of financing costs. Financing costs related to capital costs above $4.418 billion will be recovered through AFUDC; however, Georgia Power will not record AFUDC related to any capital costs in excess of the total deemed reasonable by the Georgia PSC (currently $7.3 billion) and not requested for rate recovery. On December 18, 2018, the Georgia PSC approved Georgia Power's request to increase the NCCR tariff by $88 million annually, effective January 1, 2019.
Georgia Power is required to file semi-annual VCM reports with the Georgia PSC by February 28 and August 31 of each year. In 2013, in connection with the eighth VCM report, the Georgia PSC approved a stipulation between Georgia Power and the staff of the Georgia PSC to waive the requirement to amend the Plant Vogtle Units 3 and 4 certificate in accordance with the 2009 certification order until the completion of Plant Vogtle Unit 3, or earlier if deemed appropriate by the Georgia PSC and Georgia Power.

MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS (continued)
Southern Company and Subsidiary Companies 2018 Annual Report


In 2016, the Georgia PSC voted to approve a settlement agreement (Vogtle Cost Settlement Agreement) resolving certain prudency matters in connection with the fifteenth VCM report. In December 2017, the Georgia PSC voted to approve (and issued its related order on January 11, 2018) Georgia Power's seventeenth VCM report, which included a recommendation to continue construction with Southern Nuclear as project manager and Bechtel serving as the primary construction contractor, and modified the Vogtle Cost Settlement Agreement. The Vogtle Cost Settlement Agreement, as modified by the January 11, 2018 order, resolved the following regulatory matters related to Plant Vogtle Units 3 and 4: (i) none of the $3.3 billion of costs incurred through December 31, 2015 and reflected in the fourteenth VCM report should be disallowed from rate base on the basis of imprudence; (ii) the Contractor Settlement Agreement was reasonable and prudent and none of the amounts paid pursuant to the Contractor Settlement Agreement should be disallowed from rate base on the basis of imprudence; (iii) (a) capital costs incurred up to $5.68 billion would be presumed to be reasonable and prudent with the burden of proof on any party challenging such costs, (b) Georgia Power would have the burden to show that any capital costs above $5.68 billion were prudent, and (c) a revised capital cost forecast of $7.3 billion (after reflecting the impact of payments received under the Guarantee Settlement Agreement and related Customer Refunds) was found reasonable; (iv) construction of Plant Vogtle Units 3 and 4 should be completed, with Southern Nuclear serving as project manager and Bechtel as primary contractor; (v) approved and deemed reasonable Georgia Power's revised schedule placing Plant Vogtle Units 3 and 4 in service in November 2021 and November 2022, respectively; (vi) confirmed that the revised cost forecast does not represent a cost cap and that prudence decisions on cost recovery will be made at a later date, consistent with applicable Georgia law; (vii) reduced the ROE used to calculate the NCCR tariff (a) from 10.95% (the ROE rate setting point authorized by the Georgia PSC in the 2013 ARP) to 10.00% effective January 1, 2016, (b) from 10.00% to 8.30%, effective January 1, 2020, and (c) from 8.30% to 5.30%, effective January 1, 2021 (provided that the ROE in no case will be less than Georgia Power's average cost of long-term debt); (viii) reduced the ROE used for AFUDC equity for Plant Vogtle Units 3 and 4 from 10.00% to Georgia Power's average cost of long-term debt, effective January 1, 2018; and (ix) agreed that upon Unit 3 reaching commercial operation, retail base rates would be adjusted to include carrying costs on those capital costs deemed prudent in the Vogtle Cost Settlement Agreement. The January 11, 2018 order also stated that if Plant Vogtle Units 3 and 4 are not commercially operational by June 1, 2021 and June 1, 2022, respectively, the ROE used to calculate the NCCR tariff will be further reduced by 10 basis points each month (but not lower than Georgia Power's average cost of long-term debt) until the respective Unit is commercially operational. The ROE reductions negatively impacted earnings by approximately $100 million, $25 million, and $20 million in 2018, 2017, and 2016, respectively, and are estimated to have negative earnings impacts of approximately $75 million in 2019 and an aggregate of approximately $615 million from 2020 to 2022.
In its January 11, 2018 order, the Georgia PSC also stated if other conditions change and assumptions upon which Georgia Power's seventeenth VCM report are based do not materialize, the Georgia PSC reserved the right to reconsider the decision to continue construction.
On February 12, 2018, Georgia Interfaith Power & Light, Inc. (GIPL) and Partnership for Southern Equity, Inc. (PSE) filed a petition appealing the Georgia PSC's January 11, 2018 order with the Fulton County Superior Court. On March 8, 2018, Georgia Watch filed a similar appeal to the Fulton County Superior Court for judicial review of the Georgia PSC's decision and denial of Georgia Watch's motion for reconsideration. On December 21, 2018, the Fulton County Superior Court granted Georgia Power's motion to dismiss the two appeals. On January 9, 2019, GIPL, PSE, and Georgia Watch filed an appeal of this decision with the Georgia Court of Appeals. Georgia Power believes the appeal has no merit; however, an adverse outcome in the appeal combined with subsequent adverse action by the Georgia PSC could have a material impact on Southern Company's results of operations, financial condition, and liquidity.
In preparation for its nineteenth VCM filing, Georgia Power requested Southern Nuclear to perform a full cost reforecast for the project. This reforecast, performed prior to the nineteenth VCM filing, resulted in a $0.7 billion increase to the base capital cost forecast reported in the second quarter 2018. This base cost increase primarily resulted from changed assumptions related to the finalization of contract scopes and management responsibilities for Bechtel and over 60 subcontractors, labor productivity rates, and craft labor incentives, as well as the related levels of project management, oversight, and support, including field supervision and engineering support.
Although Georgia Power believes these incremental costs are reasonable and necessary to complete the project and the Georgia PSC's order in the seventeenth VCM proceeding specifically states that the construction of Plant Vogtle Units 3 and 4 is not subject to a cost cap, Georgia Power did not seek rate recovery for these cost increases included in the current base capital cost forecast (or any related financing costs) in the nineteenth VCM report. In connection with future VCM filings, Georgia Power may request the Georgia PSC to evaluate costs currently included in the construction contingency estimate for rate recovery as and when they are appropriately included in the base capital cost forecast. After considering the significant level of uncertainty that exists regarding the future recoverability of costs included in the construction contingency estimate since the ultimate outcome of these matters is subject to the outcome of future assessments by management, as well as Georgia PSC decisions in these future regulatory proceedings, Georgia Power recorded a total pre-tax charge to income of $1.1 billion ($0.8 billion after

MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS (continued)
Southern Company and Subsidiary Companies 2018 Annual Report


tax) in the Companysecond quarter 2018, which includes the total increase in the base capital cost forecast and construction contingency estimate.
On August 31, 2018, Georgia Power filed its seventeenthnineteenth VCM report with the Georgia PSC, which requested approval of $578 million of construction capital costs incurred from January 1, 2018 through June 30, 2018. On February 19, 2019, the Georgia PSC approved the nineteenth VCM, but deferred approval of $51.6 million of expenditures related to Georgia Power's portion of an administrative claim filed in the Westinghouse bankruptcy proceedings. Through the nineteenth VCM, the Georgia PSC has approved total construction capital costs incurred through June 30, 2018 of $5.4 billion (before $1.7 billion of payments received under the Guarantee Settlement Agreement and approximately $188 million in related Customer Refunds). In addition, the staff of the Georgia PSC requested, and Georgia Power agreed, to file its twentieth VCM report concurrently with the twenty-first VCM report by August 31, 2019.
The ultimate outcome of these matters cannot be determined at this time.
DOE Financing
At December 31, 2018, Georgia Power had borrowed $2.6 billion related to Plant Vogtle Units 3 and 4 costs through the Loan Guarantee Agreement and a multi-advance credit facility among Georgia Power, the DOE, and the FFB, which provides for borrowings of up to $3.46 billion, subject to the satisfaction of certain conditions. In September 2017, the DOE issued a conditional commitment to Georgia Power for up to approximately $1.67 billion in additional guaranteed loans under the Loan Guarantee Agreement. In September 2018, the DOE extended the conditional commitment to March 31, 2019. Any further extension must be approved by the DOE. Final approval and issuance of these additional loan guarantees by the DOE cannot be assured and are subject to the negotiation of definitive agreements, completion of due diligence by the DOE, receipt of any necessary regulatory approvals, and satisfaction of other conditions. See Note 8 to the financial statements under "Long-term DebtDOE Loan Guarantee Borrowings" for additional information, including applicable covenants, events of default, mandatory prepayment events (including any decision not to continue construction of Plant Vogtle Units 3 and 4), and conditions to borrowing.
The ultimate outcome of these matters cannot be determined at this time.
Income Tax Matters
Federal Tax Reform Legislation
In December 2017, the Tax Reform Legislation was signed into law and became effective on January 1, 2018. The Tax Reform Legislation, among other things, reduced the federal corporate income tax rate to 21%, retained normalization provisions for public utility property and existing renewable energy incentives, and repealed the corporate alternative minimum tax. In addition, under the Tax Reform Legislation, NOLs generated after December 31, 2017 can no longer be carried back to previous tax years but can be carried forward indefinitely, with utilization limited to 80% of taxable income of the subsequent tax year. The projected reduction of the consolidated income tax liability resulting from the tax rate reduction also delays the expected utilization of existing tax credit carryforwards.
Following the enactment of the Tax Reform Legislation, the SEC staff issued Staff Accounting Bulletin 118 – "Income Tax Accounting Implications of the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act" (SAB 118), which provided for a measurement period of up to one year from the enactment date to complete accounting under GAAP for the tax effects of the legislation. Due to the complex and comprehensive nature of the enacted tax law changes and their application under GAAP, Southern Company considered all amounts recorded in the financial statements as a result of the Tax Reform Legislation "provisional" as discussed in SAB 118 and subject to revision prior to filing its 2017 tax return in the fourth quarter 2018. Southern Company recognized tax benefits of $30 million and $264 million in 2018 and 2017, respectively, for a total net tax benefit of $294 million as a result of the Tax Reform Legislation. In addition, in total, Southern Company recorded a $417 million decrease in regulatory assets and a $6.2 billion increase in regulatory liabilities as a result of the Tax Reform Legislation and $16 million of stranded excess deferred tax balances in AOCI at December 31, 2017 were adjusted through retained earnings in 2018. As of December 31, 2018, Southern Company considered the measurement of impacts from the Tax Reform Legislation on deferred income tax assets and liabilities, primarily due to the impact of the reduction of the corporate income tax rate, to be complete.
However, the IRS continues to issue regulations that provide further interpretation and guidance on the law and each state's adoption of the provisions contained in the Tax Reform Legislation remains uncertain. In addition, the regulatory treatment of certain impacts of the Tax Reform Legislation is subject to the discretion of the FERC and each state's regulatory commission. The ultimate impact of these matters cannot be determined at this time. See Note 2 to the financial statements for additional information regarding the traditional electric operating companies' and the natural gas distribution utilities' rate filings, including

MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS (continued)
Southern Company and Subsidiary Companies 2018 Annual Report


amounts returned to customers during 2018, to reflect the impacts of the Tax Reform Legislation. Also see FINANCIAL CONDITION AND LIQUIDITY – "Credit Rating Risk" herein and Note 10 to the financial statements under "Current and Deferred Income Taxes" for additional information.
Bonus Depreciation
Under the Tax Reform Legislation, projects with binding contracts prior to September 28, 2017 and placed in service after September 27, 2017 remain eligible for bonus depreciation under the PATH Act. The PATH Act allowed for 50% bonus depreciation for 2015 through 2017, 40% bonus depreciation for 2018, and 30% bonus depreciation for 2019 and certain long-lived assets placed in service in 2020. Based on provisional estimates, bonus depreciation is expected to result in positive cash flows of approximately $300 million for the 2018 tax year and approximately $130 million for the 2019 tax year. The ultimate outcome of this matter cannot be determined at this time.
Tax Credits
The Tax Reform Legislation retained the renewable energy incentives that were included in the PATH Act. The PATH Act allows for 30% ITC for solar projects that commence construction by December 31, 2019; 26% ITC for solar projects that commence construction in 2020; 22% ITC for solar projects that commence construction in 2021; and a permanent 10% ITC for solar projects that commence construction on or after January 1, 2022. In addition, the PATH Act allows for 100% PTC for wind projects that commenced construction in 2016; 80% PTC for wind projects that commenced construction in 2017; 60% PTC for wind projects that commenced construction in 2018 and 40% PTC for wind projects that commence construction in 2019. Wind projects commencing construction after 2019 will not be entitled to any PTCs. Southern Company has received ITCs and PTCs in connection with investments in solar, wind, and biomass facilities primarily at Southern Power and Georgia Power. See Note 1 to the financial statements under "Income Taxes" and Note 10 to the financial statements under "Current and Deferred Income TaxesTax Credit Carryforwards" for additional information regarding the utilization and amortization of credits and the tax benefit related to basis differences.
Other Matters
Southern Company and its subsidiaries are involved in various other matters being litigated and regulatory matters that could affect future earnings. In addition, Southern Company and its subsidiaries are subject to certain claims and legal actions arising in the ordinary course of business. The business activities of Southern Company's subsidiaries are subject to extensive governmental regulation related to public health and the environment, such as laws and regulations governing air, water, land, and protection of other natural resources. Litigation over environmental issues and claims of various types, including property damage, personal injury, common law nuisance, and citizen enforcement of environmental laws and regulations, has occurred throughout the U.S. This litigation has included claims for damages alleged to have been caused by CO2 and other emissions, CCR, and alleged exposure to hazardous materials, and/or requests for injunctive relief in connection with such matters.
The ultimate outcome of such pending or potential litigation or regulatory matters cannot be predicted at this time; however, for current proceedings not specifically reported herein or in Notes 2 and 3 to the financial statements, management does not anticipate that the ultimate liabilities, if any, arising from such current proceedings would have a material effect on Southern Company's financial statements. See Notes 2 and 3 to the financial statements for a discussion of various other contingencies, regulatory matters, and other matters being litigated which may affect future earnings potential.
Litigation
In January 2017, a putative securities class action complaint was filed against Southern Company, certain of its officers, and certain former Mississippi Power officers in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Georgia, Atlanta Division, by Monroe County Employees' Retirement System on behalf of all persons who purchased shares of Southern Company's common stock between April 25, 2012 and October 29, 2013. The complaint alleges that Southern Company, certain of its officers, and certain former Mississippi Power officers made materially false and misleading statements regarding the Kemper County energy facility in violation of certain provisions under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. The complaint seeks, among other things, compensatory damages and litigation costs and attorneys' fees. In June 2017, the plaintiffs filed an amended complaint that provided additional detail about their claims, increased the purported class period by one day, and added certain other former Mississippi Power officers as defendants. In July 2017, the defendants filed a motion to dismiss the plaintiffs' amended complaint with prejudice, to which the plaintiffs filed an opposition in September 2017. On March 29, 2018, the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Georgia, Atlanta Division, issued an order granting, in part, the defendants' motion to dismiss. The court dismissed certain claims against certain officers of Southern Company and Mississippi Power and dismissed the allegations related to a number of the statements that plaintiffs challenged as being false or misleading. On April 26, 2018, the

MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS (continued)
Southern Company and Subsidiary Companies 2018 Annual Report


defendants filed a motion for reconsideration of the court's order, seeking dismissal of the remaining claims in the lawsuit. On August 10, 2018, the court denied the motion for reconsideration and denied a motion to certify the issue for interlocutory appeal.
In February 2017, Jean Vineyard filed a shareholder derivative lawsuit and, in May 2017, Judy Mesirov filed a shareholder derivative lawsuit, each in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Georgia. Each of these lawsuits names as defendants Southern Company, certain of its directors, certain of its officers, and certain former Mississippi Power officers. In August 2017, these two shareholder derivative lawsuits were consolidated in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Georgia. The complaints allege that the defendants caused Southern Company to make false or misleading statements regarding the Kemper County energy facility cost and schedule. Further, the complaints allege that the defendants were unjustly enriched and caused the waste of corporate assets and also allege that the individual defendants violated their fiduciary duties. Each plaintiff seeks to recover, on behalf of Southern Company, unspecified actual damages and, on each plaintiff's own behalf, attorneys' fees and costs in bringing the lawsuit. Each plaintiff also seeks certain changes to Southern Company's corporate governance and internal processes. On April 25, 2018, the court entered an order staying this lawsuit until 30 days after the resolution of any dispositive motions or any settlement, whichever is earlier, in the putative securities class action.
In May 2017, Helen E. Piper Survivor's Trust filed a shareholder derivative lawsuit in the Superior Court of Gwinnett County, State of Georgia that names as defendants Southern Company, certain of its directors, certain of its officers, and certain former Mississippi Power officers. The complaint alleges that the individual defendants, among other things, breached their fiduciary duties in connection with schedule delays and cost overruns associated with the construction of the Kemper County energy facility. The complaint further alleges that the individual defendants authorized or failed to correct false and misleading statements regarding the Kemper County energy facility schedule and cost and failed to implement necessary internal controls to prevent harm to Southern Company. The plaintiff seeks to recover, on behalf of Southern Company, unspecified actual damages and disgorgement of profits and, on its behalf, attorneys' fees and costs in bringing the lawsuit. The plaintiff also seeks certain unspecified changes to Southern Company's corporate governance and internal processes. On May 4, 2018, the court entered an order staying this lawsuit until 30 days after the resolution of any dispositive motions or any settlement, whichever is earlier, in the putative securities class action.
On May 18, 2018, Southern Company and Mississippi Power received a notice of dispute and arbitration demand filed by Martin Product Sales, LLC (Martin) based on two agreements, both related to Kemper IGCC byproducts for which Mississippi Power provided termination notices in September 2017. Martin alleges breach of contract, breach of good faith and fair dealing, fraud and misrepresentation, and civil conspiracy and makes a claim for damages in the amount of approximately $143 million, as well as additional unspecified damages, attorney's fees, costs, and interest. In the first quarter 2019, Mississippi Power and Southern Company filed motions to dismiss.
Southern Company believes these legal challenges have no merit; however, an adverse outcome in any of these proceedings could have an impact on Southern Company's results of operations, financial condition, and liquidity. Southern Company will vigorously defend itself in these matters, the ultimate outcome of which cannot be determined at this time.
Investments in Leveraged Leases
A subsidiary of Southern Holdings has several leveraged lease agreements, with original terms ranging up to 45 years, which relate to international and domestic energy generation, distribution, and transportation assets. Southern Company receives federal income tax deductions for depreciation and amortization, as well as interest on long-term debt related to these investments. Southern Company reviews all important lease assumptions at least annually, or more frequently if events or changes in circumstances indicate that a change in assumptions has occurred or may occur. These assumptions include the effective tax rate, the residual value, the credit quality of the lessees, and the timing of expected tax cash flows. See Note 1 to the financial statements under "Leveraged Leases" for additional information.
The ability of the lessees to make required payments to the Southern Holdings subsidiary is dependent on the operational performance of the assets. In 2017, the financial and operational performance of one of the lessees and the associated generation assets raised significant concerns about the short-term ability of the generation assets to produce cash flows sufficient to support ongoing operations and the lessee's contractual obligations and its ability to make the remaining semi-annual lease payments to the Southern Holdings subsidiary beginning in June 2018. As a result of operational improvements in 2018, the 2018 lease payments were paid in full. However, operational issues and the resulting cash liquidity challenges persist and significant concerns continue regarding the lessee's ability to make the remaining semi-annual lease payments. These operational challenges may also impact the expected residual value of the assets at the end of the lease term in 2047. If any future lease payment is not paid in full, the Southern Holdings subsidiary may be unable to make its corresponding payment to the holders of the underlying non-recourse debt related to the generation assets. Failure to make the required payment to the debtholders could represent an event of default that would give the debtholders the right to foreclose on, and take ownership of, the generation assets from the

MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS (continued)
Southern Company and Subsidiary Companies 2018 Annual Report


Southern Holdings subsidiary, in effect terminating the lease and resulting in the write-off of the related lease receivable, which would result in a reduction in net income of approximately $86 million after tax based on the lease receivable balance at December 31, 2018. Southern Company has evaluated the recoverability of the lease receivable and the expected residual value of the generation assets at the end of the lease under various scenarios and has concluded that its investment in the leveraged lease is not impaired at December 31, 2018. Southern Company will continue to monitor the operational performance of the underlying assets and evaluate the ability of the lessee to continue to make the required lease payments. The ultimate outcome of this matter cannot be determined at this time.
Mississippi Power
In conjunction with Southern Company's sale of Gulf Power, Mississippi Power and Gulf Power have committed to seek a restructuring of their 50% undivided ownership interests in Plant Daniel such that each of them would, after the restructuring, own 100% of a generating unit. On January 15, 2019, Gulf Power provided notice to Mississippi Power that Gulf Power will retire its share of the generating capacity of Plant Daniel on January 15, 2024. Mississippi Power has the option to purchase Gulf Power's ownership interest for $1 on January 15, 2024, provided that Mississippi Power exercises the option no later than 120 days prior to that date. Mississippi Power is assessing the potential operational and economic effects of Gulf Power's notice. The ultimate outcome of these matters remains subject to completion of Mississippi Power's evaluations and applicable regulatory approvals, including the FERC and the Mississippi PSC, and cannot now be determined. See Note 15 to the financial statements under "Southern Company's Sale of Gulf Power" for information regarding the sale of Gulf Power.
Southern Power
On January 29, 2019, Pacific Gas & Electric Company (PG&E) filed petitions to reorganize under Chapter 11 of the U.S. Bankruptcy Code. Southern Power, together with its noncontrolling partners, owns four solar facilities where PG&E is the energy off-taker for approximately 207 MWs of capacity under long-term PPAs. PG&E is also the transmission provider for these facilities and two of Southern Power's other solar facilities. Southern Power has evaluated the recoverability of its investments in these solar facilities under various scenarios, including selling the related energy into the competitive markets, and has concluded they are not impaired. At December 31, 2018, Southern Power had outstanding accounts receivables due from PG&E of $1 million related to the PPAs and $36 million related to the transmission interconnections. Southern Company does not expect a material impact to its financial statements if, as a result of the bankruptcy proceedings, PG&E does not perform in accordance with the PPAs or the terms of the PPAs are renegotiated; however, the ultimate outcome of this matter cannot be determined at this time.
Southern Company Gas
A wholly-owned subsidiary of Southern Company Gas owns and operates a natural gas storage facility consisting of two salt dome caverns in Louisiana. Periodic integrity tests are required in accordance with rules of the Louisiana Department of Natural Resources (DNR). In August 2017, in connection with an ongoing integrity project, updated seismic mapping indicated the proximity of one of the caverns to the edge of the salt dome may be less than the required minimum and could result in Southern Company Gas retiring the cavern early. At December 31, 2018, the facility's property, plant, and equipment had a net book value of $109 million, of which the cavern itself represents approximately 20%. A potential early retirement of this cavern is dependent upon several factors including compliance with an order from the Louisiana DNR detailing the requirements to place the cavern back in service, which includes, among other things, obtaining core samples to determine the composition of the sheath surrounding the edge of the salt dome.
The cavern continues to maintain its pressures and overall structural integrity. Southern Company Gas intends to monitor the cavern and comply with the Louisiana DNR order through 2020 and place the cavern back in service in 2021. These events were considered in connection with Southern Company Gas' annual long-lived asset impairment analysis, which determined there was no impairment as of December 31, 2018. Any changes in results of monitoring activities, rates at which expiring capacity contracts are re-contracted, timing of placing the cavern back in service, or Louisiana DNR requirements could trigger impairment. Further, early retirement of the cavern could trigger impairment of other long-lived assets associated with the natural gas storage facility. The ultimate outcome of this matter cannot be determined at this time, but could have a significant impact on Southern Company's financial statements.
ACCOUNTING POLICIES
Application of Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates
Southern Company prepares its consolidated financial statements in accordance with GAAP. Significant accounting policies are described in Notes 1, 5, and 6 to the financial statements. In the application of these policies, certain estimates are made that may

MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS (continued)
Southern Company and Subsidiary Companies 2018 Annual Report


have a material impact on Southern Company's results of operations and related disclosures. Different assumptions and measurements could produce estimates that are significantly different from those recorded in the financial statements. Senior management has reviewed and discussed the following critical accounting policies and estimates with the Audit Committee of Southern Company's Board of Directors.
Utility Regulation
Southern Company's traditional electric operating companies and natural gas distribution utilities, which collectively comprised approximately 85% of Southern Company's total operating revenues for 2018, are subject to retail regulation by their respective state PSCs or other applicable state regulatory agencies and wholesale regulation by the FERC. These regulatory agencies set the rates the traditional electric operating companies and the natural gas distribution utilities are permitted to charge customers based on allowable costs, including a reasonable ROE. As a result, the traditional electric operating companies and the natural gas distribution utilities apply accounting standards which require the financial statements to reflect the effects of rate regulation. Through the ratemaking process, the regulators may require the inclusion of costs or revenues in periods different than when they would be recognized by a non-regulated company. This treatment may result in the deferral of expenses and the recording of related regulatory assets based on anticipated future recovery through rates or the deferral of gains or creation of liabilities and the recording of related regulatory liabilities. The application of the accounting standards has a further effect on Southern Company's financial statements as a result of the estimates of allowable costs used in the ratemaking process. These estimates may differ from those actually incurred by the traditional electric operating companies and the natural gas distribution utilities; therefore, the accounting estimates inherent in specific costs such as depreciation, AROs, and pension and other postretirement benefits have less of a direct impact on Southern Company's results of operations and financial condition than they would on a non-regulated company. See Note 15 to the financial statements for information regarding the sale of Gulf Power and three of Southern Company Gas' natural gas distribution utilities.
As reflected in Note 2 to the financial statements under "Southern CompanyRegulatory Assets and Liabilities," significant regulatory assets and liabilities have been recorded. Management reviews the ultimate recoverability of these regulatory assets and any requirement to refund these regulatory liabilities based on applicable regulatory guidelines and GAAP. However, adverse legislative, judicial, or regulatory actions could materially impact the amounts of such regulatory assets and liabilities and could adversely impact Southern Company's financial statements.
Estimated Cost, Schedule, and Rate Recovery for the Construction of Plant Vogtle Units 3 and 4
In 2016, the Georgia PSC approved the Vogtle Cost Settlement Agreement, which resolved certain prudency matters in connection with Georgia Power's fifteenth VCM report. In December 2017, the Georgia PSC approved Georgia Power's seventeenth VCM report, which included a recommendation to continue construction of Plant Vogtle Units 3 and 4, with Southern Nuclear serving as project manager and Bechtel serving as the primary construction contractor. Oncontractor, as well as a modification of the Vogtle Cost Settlement Agreement. The Georgia PSC's related order stated that under the modified Vogtle Cost Settlement Agreement, (i) none of the $3.3 billion of costs incurred through December 21, 2017,31, 2015 should be disallowed as imprudent; (ii) capital costs incurred up to $5.68 billion would be presumed to be reasonable and prudent with the burden of proof on any party challenging such costs; (iii) Georgia Power would have the burden of proof to show that any capital costs above $5.68 billion were prudent; (iv) Georgia Power's total project capital cost forecast of $7.3 billion (net of $1.7 billion received under the Guarantee Settlement Agreement and approximately $188 million in related Customer Refunds) was found reasonable and did not represent a cost cap; and (v) prudence decisions would be made subsequent to achieving fuel load for Unit 4.
In its order, the Georgia PSC approvedalso stated if other conditions change and assumptions upon which Georgia Power's seventeenth VCM report are based do not materialize, the Company's recommendationGeorgia PSC reserved the right to reconsider the decision to continue construction.
The Company expectsIn the second quarter 2018, Georgia Power revised its base cost forecast and estimated contingency to complete construction and start-up of Plant Vogtle Units 3 and 4 to be placed in service by November 2021$8.0 billion and November 2022, respectively. The Company's revised$0.4 billion, respectively, for a total project capital cost forecast for its 45.7% proportionate shareof $8.4 billion (net of $1.7 billion received under the Guarantee Settlement Agreement and approximately $188 million in related Customer Refunds). Although Georgia Power believes these incremental costs are reasonable and necessary to complete the project and the Georgia PSC's order in the seventeenth VCM proceeding specifically states that the construction of Plant Vogtle Units 3 and 4 is $8.8not subject to a cost cap, Georgia Power did not seek rate recovery for the $0.7 billion ($7.3 billion after reflectingincrease in costs included in the impact of payments received under a settlement agreement regardingcurrent base capital cost forecast in the Toshiba Guarantee (Guarantee Settlement Agreement) and certain refunds to customers ordered bynineteenth VCM report. In connection with future VCM filings, Georgia Power may request the Georgia PSC (Customer Refunds)). The Company's CWIP balanceto evaluate costs currently included in the construction contingency estimate for rate recovery as and when they are appropriately included in the base capital cost forecast. After considering the significant level of uncertainty that exists regarding the future recoverability of costs included in the construction contingency estimate since the ultimate outcome of these matters is subject to the outcome of future assessments by management, as well as Georgia PSC decisions in these future

MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS (continued)
Southern Company and Subsidiary Companies 2018 Annual Report


regulatory proceedings, Georgia Power recorded a total pre-tax charge to income of $1.1 billion ($0.8 billion after tax) in the second quarter 2018.
Georgia Power's revised cost estimate reflects an expected in-service date of November 2021 for Unit 3 and November 2022 for Unit 4.
As construction continues, challenges with management of contractors, subcontractors, and vendors; labor productivity, availability, and/or cost escalation; procurement, fabrication, delivery, assembly, and/or installation and testing, including any required engineering changes, of plant systems, structures, and components (some of which are based on new technology that only recently began initial operation in the global nuclear industry at this scale); or other issues could arise and change the projected schedule and estimated cost. Monthly construction production targets required to maintain the current project schedule will continue to increase significantly throughout 2019. To meet these increasing monthly targets, existing craft construction productivity must improve and additional craft laborers must be retained and deployed.
Georgia Power and Southern Nuclear believe it is a leading practice in connection with a construction project of this size and complexity to periodically validate recent construction progress in comparison to the projected schedule and to verify and update quantities of commodities remaining to install, labor productivity, and forecasted staffing needs. This verification process, led by Southern Nuclear, was underway as of December 31, 2018 and is expected to be completed during the second quarter 2019. Georgia Power currently does not anticipate any material changes to the total estimated project capital cost forecast for Plant Vogtle Units 3 and 4 was $3.3or the expected in-service dates of November 2021 and November 2022, respectively, resulting from this verification process. However, the ultimate impact on cost and schedule, if any, will not be known until the verification process is completed. Georgia Power is required to report the results and any project impacts to the Georgia PSC by May 15, 2019.
There have been technical and procedural challenges to the construction and licensing of Plant Vogtle Units 3 and 4 at the federal and state level and additional challenges may arise. Processes are in place that are designed to assure compliance with the requirements specified in the Westinghouse Design Control Document and the combined construction and operating licenses, including inspections by Southern Nuclear and the NRC that occur throughout construction. As a result of such compliance processes, certain license amendment requests have been filed and approved or are pending before the NRC. Various design and other licensing-based compliance matters, including the timely resolution of ITAAC and the related approvals by the NRC, may arise, which may result in additional license amendments or require other resolution. If any license amendment requests or other licensing-based compliance issues are not resolved in a timely manner, there may be delays in the project schedule that could result in increased costs.
The ultimate outcome of these matters cannot be determined at this time. Any extension of the in-service dates of November 2021 for Unit 3 and November 2022 for Unit 4 is currently estimated to result in additional base capital costs of approximately $50 million per month, based on Georgia Power's ownership interests, and AFUDC of approximately $12 million per month. While Georgia Power is not precluded from seeking recovery of any future capital cost forecast increase, management will ultimately determine whether or not to seek recovery. Any further changes to the capital cost forecast that are not expected to be recoverable through regulated rates will be required to be charged to income and such charges could be material.
Given the significant complexity involved in estimating the future costs to complete construction and start-up of Plant Vogtle Units 3 and 4 and the significant management judgment necessary to assess the related uncertainties surrounding future rate recovery of any projected cost increases, as well as the potential impact on Southern Company's results of operations and cash flows, Southern Company considers these items to be critical accounting estimates. See Note 2 to the financial statements under "Georgia PowerNuclear Construction" for additional information.
Accounting for Income Taxes
The consolidated income tax provision and deferred income tax assets and liabilities, as well as any unrecognized tax benefits and valuation allowances, require significant judgment and estimates. These estimates are supported by historical tax return data, reasonable projections of taxable income, and interpretations of applicable tax laws and regulations across multiple taxing jurisdictions. The effective tax rate reflects the statutory tax rates and calculated apportionments for the various states in which the Southern Company system operates.
Southern Company files a consolidated federal income tax return and various state income tax returns, some of which are combined or unitary. Under a joint consolidated income tax allocation agreement, each Southern Company subsidiary's current and deferred tax expense is computed on a stand-alone basis and no subsidiary is allocated more current expense than would be paid if it filed a separate income tax return. Certain deductions and credits can be limited at the consolidated or combined level resulting in NOL and tax credit carryforwards that would not otherwise result on a stand-alone basis. Utilization of NOL and tax credit carryforwards and the assessment of valuation allowances are based on significant judgment and extensive analysis of

MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS (continued)
Southern Company and Subsidiary Companies 2018 Annual Report


Southern Company's current financial position and result of operations, including currently available information about future years, to estimate when future taxable income will be realized.
Current and deferred state income tax liabilities and assets are estimated based on laws of multiple states that determine the income to be apportioned to their jurisdictions. States utilize various formulas to calculate the apportionment of taxable income, primarily using sales, assets, or payroll within the jurisdiction compared to the consolidated totals. In addition, each state varies as to whether a stand-alone, combined, or unitary filing methodology is required. The calculation of deferred state taxes considers apportionment factors and filing methodologies that are expected to apply in future years. The apportionments and methodologies which are ultimately finalized in a manner inconsistent with expectations could have a material effect on Southern Company's financial statements.
Given the significant judgment involved in estimating NOL and tax credit carryforwards and multi-state apportionments for all subsidiaries, Southern Company considers federal and state deferred income tax liabilities and assets to be critical accounting estimates.
Asset Retirement Obligations
AROs are computed as the fair value of the estimated costs for an asset's future retirement and are recorded in the period in which the liability is incurred. The estimated costs are capitalized as part of the related long-lived asset and depreciated over the asset's useful life. In the absence of quoted market prices, AROs are estimated using present value techniques in which estimates of future cash outlays associated with the asset retirements are discounted using a credit-adjusted risk-free rate. Estimates of the timing and amounts of future cash outlays are based on projections of when and how the assets will be retired and the cost of future removal activities.
The liability for AROs primarily relates to facilities that are subject to the CCR Rule and the related state rules, principally ash ponds, and the decommissioning of the Southern Company system's nuclear facilities – Alabama Power's Plant Farley and Georgia Power's ownership interests in Plant Hatch and Plant Vogtle Units 1 and 2. In addition, the Southern Company system has AROs related to various landfill sites, asbestos removal, mine reclamation, land restoration related to solar and wind facilities, and disposal of polychlorinated biphenyls in certain transformers.
The traditional electric operating companies and Southern Company Gas also have identified retirement obligations, such as obligations related to certain electric transmission and distribution facilities, certain asbestos containing material within long-term assets not subject to ongoing repair and maintenance activities, certain wireless communication towers, the disposal of polychlorinated biphenyls in certain transformers, leasehold improvements, equipment on customer property, and property associated with the Southern Company system's rail lines and natural gas pipelines. However, liabilities for the removal of these assets have not been recorded as the fair value of the retirement obligations cannot be reasonably estimated. A liability for these retirement obligations will be recognized when sufficient information becomes available to support a reasonable estimation of the retirement obligation.
The cost estimates for AROs related to the disposal of CCR are based on information using various assumptions related to closure and post-closure costs, timing of future cash outlays, inflation and discount rates, and the potential methods for complying with the CCR Rule. During 2018, Alabama Power and Georgia Power recorded increases of approximately $1.2 billion and $3.1 billion, respectively, to their AROs related to the disposal of CCR and increases of approximately $300 million and $130 million, respectively, to their AROs related to updated nuclear decommissioning cost site studies. Alabama Power's CCR-related update resulted from feasibility studies performed on ash ponds in use at the plants it operates, which indicated that additional closure costs, primarily related to increases in estimated ash volume, water management requirements, and design revisions, will be required to close these ash ponds under the planned closure-in-place methodology. Georgia Power's CCR-related update resulted from a strategic assessment which indicated additional closure costs will be required to close its ash ponds, primarily due to changes in closure strategies, the estimated amount of ash to be excavated, and additional water management requirements necessary to support closure strategies. The traditional electric operating companies expect to periodically update their ARO cost estimates. See FUTURE EARNINGS POTENTIAL – "Environmental MattersEnvironmental Laws and RegulationsCoal Combustion Residuals" herein and Note 6 to the financial statements for additional information.
Given the significant judgment involved in estimating AROs, Southern Company considers the liabilities for AROs to be critical accounting estimates.
Pension and Other Postretirement Benefits
Southern Company's calculation of pension and other postretirement benefits expense is dependent on a number of assumptions. These assumptions include discount rates, healthcare cost trend rates, expected long-term return on plan assets, mortality rates, expected salary and wage increases, and other factors. Components of pension and other postretirement benefits expense include

MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS (continued)
Southern Company and Subsidiary Companies 2018 Annual Report


interest and service cost on the pension and other postretirement benefit plans, expected return on plan assets, and amortization of certain unrecognized costs and obligations. Actual results that differ from the assumptions utilized are accumulated and amortized over future periods and, therefore, generally affect recognized expense and the recorded obligation in future periods. While Southern Company believes that the assumptions used are appropriate, differences in actual experience or significant changes in assumptions would affect its pension and other postretirement benefit costs and obligations.
Key elements in determining Southern Company's pension and other postretirement benefit expense are the expected long-term return on plan assets and the discount rate used to measure the benefit plan obligations and the periodic benefit plan expense for future periods. The expected long-term return on pension and other postretirement benefit plan assets is based on Southern Company's investment strategy, historical experience, and expectations for long-term rates of return that consider external actuarial advice. Southern Company determines the long-term return on plan assets by applying the long-term rate of expected returns on various asset classes to Southern Company's target asset allocation. For purposes of determining its liability related to the pension and other postretirement benefit plans, Southern Company discounts the future related cash flows using a single-point discount rate for each plan developed from the weighted average of market-observed yields for high quality fixed income securities with maturities that correspond to expected benefit payments.
The following table illustrates the sensitivity to changes in Southern Company's long-term assumptions with respect to the discount rate, salary increases, and the long-term rate of return on plan assets:
Change in AssumptionIncrease/(Decrease) in Total Benefit Expense for 2019Increase/(Decrease) in Projected Obligation for Pension Plan at December 31, 2018Increase/(Decrease) in Projected Obligation for Other Postretirement Benefit Plans at December 31, 2018
(in millions)
25 basis point change in discount rate$37/$(36)$434/$(411)$50/$(48)
25 basis point change in salaries$11/$(11)$105/$(101)$–/$–
25 basis point change in long-term return on plan assets$33/$(33)N/AN/A
N/A – Not applicable
See Note 11 to the financial statements for additional information regarding pension and other postretirement benefits.
Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets
The acquisition method of accounting requires the assets acquired and liabilities assumed to be recorded at the date of acquisition at their respective estimated fair values. Southern Company recognizes goodwill as of the acquisition date, as a residual over the fair values of the identifiable net assets acquired. Goodwill is tested for impairment on an annual basis in the fourth quarter of the year as well as on an interim basis as events and changes in circumstances occur. Primarily as a result of the acquisitions of Southern Company Gas and PowerSecure in 2016, goodwill totaled approximately $5.3 billion at December 31, 2018. As a result of the Southern Company Gas Dispositions, goodwill was reduced by $910 million during 2018. In addition, Southern Company Gas recorded a $42 million goodwill impairment charge in 2018 in contemplation of the sale of Pivotal Home Solutions.
Definite-lived intangible assets acquired are amortized over the estimated useful lives of the respective assets to reflect the pattern in which the economic benefits of the intangible assets are consumed. Whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of the intangible assets may not be recoverable, the intangible assets will be reviewed for impairment. Primarily as a result of the acquisitions of Southern Company Gas and PowerSecure and PPA fair value adjustments resulting from Southern Power's acquisitions, other intangible assets, net of amortization totaled approximately $613 million at December 31, 2018.
The judgments made in determining the estimated fair value assigned to each class of assets acquired and liabilities assumed, as well as asset lives, can significantly impact Southern Company's results of operations. Fair values and useful lives are determined based on, among other factors, the expected future period of benefit of the asset, the various characteristics of the asset, and projected cash flows. As the determination of an asset's fair value and useful life involves management making certain estimates and because these estimates form the basis for the determination of whether or not an impairment charge should be recorded, Southern Company considers these estimates to be critical accounting estimates.
See Note 1 to the financial statements under "Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets and Liabilities" for additional information regarding Southern Company's goodwill and other intangible assets and Note 15 to the financial statements for additional

MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS (continued)
Southern Company and Subsidiary Companies 2018 Annual Report


information related to Southern Company's 2016 acquisitions of Southern Company Gas and PowerSecure, as well as the Southern Company Gas Dispositions.
Derivatives and Hedging Activities
Derivative instruments are recorded on the balance sheets as either assets or liabilities measured at their fair value, unless the transactions qualify for the normal purchases or normal sales scope exception and are instead subject to traditional accrual accounting. For those transactions that do not qualify as a normal purchase or normal sale, changes in the derivatives' fair values are recognized concurrently in earnings unless specific hedge accounting criteria are met. If the derivatives meet those criteria, derivative gains and losses offset related results of the hedged item in the income statement in the case of a fair value hedge, or gains and losses are deferred in OCI until the hedged transaction affects earnings in the case of a cash flow hedge. Certain subsidiaries of Southern Company enter into energy-related derivatives that are designated as regulatory hedges where gains and losses are initially recorded as regulatory liabilities and assets and then are included in fuel expense as the underlying fuel is used in operations and ultimately recovered through billings to customers.
Southern Company uses derivative instruments to reduce the impact to the results of operations due to the risk of changes in the price of natural gas, to manage fuel hedging programs per guidelines of state regulatory agencies, and to mitigate residual changes in the price of electricity, weather, interest rates, and foreign currency exchange rates. The fair value of commodity derivative instruments used to manage exposure to changing prices reflects the estimated amounts that Southern Company would receive or pay to terminate or close the contracts at the reporting date. To determine the fair value of the derivative instruments, Southern Company utilizes market data or assumptions that market participants would use in pricing the derivative asset or liability, including assumptions about risk and the risks inherent in the inputs of the valuation technique.
Southern Company classifies derivative assets and liabilities based on the lowest level of input that is significant to the fair value measurement. The assessment of the significance of a particular input to the fair value measurement requires judgment and may affect the valuation of fair value assets and liabilities and their placement within the fair value hierarchy. The determination of the fair value of the derivative instruments incorporates various required factors. These factors include:
the creditworthiness of the counterparties involved and the impact of credit enhancements (such as cash deposits and letters of credit);
events specific to a given counterparty; and
the impact of Southern Company's nonperformance risk on its liabilities.
Given the assumptions used in pricing the derivative asset or liability, Southern Company considers the valuation of derivative assets and liabilities a critical accounting estimate. See FINANCIAL CONDITION AND LIQUIDITY – "Market Price Risk" herein and Note 14 to the financial statements for more information.
Contingent Obligations
Southern Company is subject to a number of federal and state laws and regulations as well as other factors and conditions that subject it to environmental, litigation, and other risks. See FUTURE EARNINGS POTENTIAL herein and Notes 2 and 3 to the financial statements for more information regarding certain of these contingencies. Southern Company periodically evaluates its exposure to such risks and records reserves for those matters where a non-tax-related loss is considered probable and reasonably estimable. The adequacy of reserves can be significantly affected by external events or conditions that can be unpredictable; thus, the ultimate outcome of such matters could materially affect Southern Company's results of operations, cash flows, or financial condition.
Recently Issued Accounting Standards
See Note 1 to the financial statements under "Recently Adopted Accounting Standards" for additional information.
In 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-02, Leases (Topic 842) (ASU 2016-02). ASU 2016-02 requires lessees to recognize on the balance sheet a lease liability and a right-of-use asset for all leases. ASU 2016-02 also changes the recognition, measurement, and presentation of expense associated with leases and provides clarification regarding the identification of certain components of contracts that would represent a lease. The accounting required by lessors is relatively unchanged and there is no change to the accounting for existing leveraged leases. ASU 2016-02 is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2018 and Southern Company adopted the new standard effective January 1, 2019.
Southern Company elected the transition methodology provided by ASU No. 2018-11, Leases (Topic 842): Targeted Improvements, whereby the requirements of ASU 2016-02 are applied on a prospective basis as of the adoption date of January 1, 2019, without restating prior periods. Southern Company elected the package of practical expedients provided by ASU 2016-02

MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS (continued)
Southern Company and Subsidiary Companies 2018 Annual Report


that allows prior determinations of whether existing contracts are, or contain, leases and the classification of existing leases to continue without reassessment. Additionally, Southern Company applied the use-of-hindsight practical expedient in determining lease terms as of the date of adoption and elected the practical expedient that allows existing land easements not previously accounted for as leases not to be reassessed. Southern Company also made accounting policy elections to account for short-term leases in all asset classes as off-balance sheet leases and combined lease and non-lease components in the computations of lease obligations and right-of-use assets for most asset classes.
The Southern Company system completed the implementation of a new application to track and account for its leases and updated its internal controls and accounting policies to support the accounting for leases under ASU 2016-02. The Southern Company system completed its lease inventory and determined its most significant leases involve PPAs, real estate, and communication towers where certain of Southern Company's subsidiaries are the lessee and PPAs where certain of Southern Company's subsidiaries are the lessor. In the first quarter 2019, the adoption of ASU 2016-02 resulted in recording lease liabilities and right-of-use assets on Southern Company's balance sheet each totaling approximately $2.0 billion, with no impact on Southern Company's statement of income.
FINANCIAL CONDITION AND LIQUIDITY
Overview
Earnings in all periods presented were negatively affected by charges associated with plants under construction; however, Southern Company's financial condition remained stable at December 31, 2018.
The Southern Company system's cash requirements primarily consist of funding ongoing operations, common stock dividends, capital expenditures, and debt maturities. The Southern Company system's capital expenditures and other investing activities include investments to meet projected long-term demand requirements, including to build new electric generation facilities, to maintain existing electric generation facilities, to comply with environmental regulations including adding environmental modifications to certain existing electric generating units and closures of ash ponds, to expand and improve electric transmission and distribution facilities, to update and expand natural gas distribution systems, and for restoration following major storms. Operating cash flows provide a substantial portion of the Southern Company system's cash needs. For the three-year period from 2019 through 2021, Southern Company's projected common stock dividends, capital expenditures, and debt maturities are expected to exceed operating cash flows. Southern Company plans to finance future cash needs in excess of its operating cash flows primarily by accessing borrowings from financial institutions and through debt and equity issuances in the capital markets. Southern Company intends to continue to monitor its access to short-term and long-term capital markets as well as bank credit arrangements to meet future capital and liquidity needs. See "Sources of Capital," "Financing Activities," and "Capital Requirements and Contractual Obligations" herein for additional information.
Southern Company's investments in the qualified pension plans and the nuclear decommissioning trust funds decreased in value at December 31, 2018 as compared to December 31, 2017. No contributions to the qualified pension plan were made for the year ended December 31, 2018 and no mandatory contributions to the qualified pension plans are anticipated during 2019. See "Contractual Obligations" herein and Notes 6 and 11 to the financial statements under "Nuclear Decommissioning" and "Pension Plans," respectively, for additional information.
Net cash provided from operating activities in 2018 totaled $6.9 billion, an increase of $0.6 billion from 2017. The increase in net cash provided from operating activities was primarily due to the timing of vendor payments and increased fuel cost recovery. Net cash provided from operating activities in 2017 totaled $6.4 billion, an increase of $1.5 billion from 2016. Significant changes in operating cash flow for 2017 as compared to 2016 included increases of $1.2 billion related to operating activities of Southern Company Gas, which was acquired on July 1, 2016, and $1.0 billion related to voluntary contributions to the qualified pension plan in 2016, partially offset by the timing of vendor payments.
Net cash used for investing activities in 2018, 2017, and 2016 totaled $5.8 billion, $7.2 billion, and $20.0 billion, respectively. The cash used for investing activities in 2018 was primarily due to the traditional electric operating companies' installation of equipment to comply with environmental standards and construction of electric generation, transmission, and distribution facilities and capital expenditures for Southern Company Gas' infrastructure replacement programs, partially offset by proceeds from the sale transactions described in Note 15 to the financial statements. The cash used for investing activities in 2017 was primarily due to the traditional electric operating companies' installation of equipment to comply with environmental standards and construction of electric generation, transmission, and distribution facilities, capital expenditures for Southern Company Gas' infrastructure replacement programs, and Southern Power's renewable acquisitions. The cash used for investing activities in 2016 was primarily due to the closing of the Merger, the acquisition of PowerSecure, Southern Company Gas' investment in SNG, the traditional electric operating companies' construction of electric generation, transmission, and distribution facilities and

MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS (continued)
Southern Company and Subsidiary Companies 2018 Annual Report


installation of equipment at electric generating facilities to comply with environmental standards, and Southern Power's acquisitions and construction of renewable facilities and a natural gas facility.
Net cash used for financing activities totaled $1.8 billion in 2018 primarily due to net redemptions and repurchases of long-term debt, common stock dividend payments, and a decrease in commercial paper borrowings, partially offset by net issuances of short-term bank debt, proceeds from Southern Power's sales of non-controlling equity interests in entities indirectly owning substantially all of its solar facilities and eight of its wind facilities, and the issuance of common stock. Net cash provided from financing activities totaled $1.0 billion in 2017 primarily due to net issuances of long-term and short-term debt, partially offset by common stock dividend payments. Net cash provided from financing activities totaled $15.7 billion in 2016 primarily due to issuances of long-term debt and common stock associated with completing the Merger and funding the subsidiaries' continuous construction programs, Southern Power's acquisitions, and Southern Company Gas' investment in SNG, partially offset by redemptions of long-term debt and common stock dividend payments. Fluctuations in cash flow from financing activities vary from year to year based on capital needs and the maturity or redemption of securities.
Significant balance sheet changes in 2018 included the reclassification of $5.7 billion and $3.3 billion in total assets and liabilities held for sale, respectively, primarily associated with Gulf Power, as well as decreases of $3.0 billion and $0.4 billion in total assets and liabilities, respectively, associated with the sales described in Note 15 to the financial statements under "Southern Power" and "Southern Company Gas." Also see Note 15 to the financial statements under "Southern Company's Sale of Gulf Power" and "Assets Held for Sale" for additional information. After adjusting for these changes, other significant balance sheet changes included an increase of $7.1 billion in total property, plant, and equipment primarily related to the $4.7 billion increase in AROs at Alabama Power and Georgia Power, as well as the traditional electric operating companies' installation of equipment to comply with environmental standards and construction of electric generation, transmission, and distribution facilities and Southern Company Gas' capital expenditures for infrastructure replacement programs, partially offset by the second quarter 2018 charge related to the construction of Plant Vogtle Units 3 and 4; a decrease of $3.1 billion in long-term debt (including amounts due within one year) resulting from the repayment of long-term debt; an increase of $3.0 billion in noncontrolling interests at Southern Power as a result of sales of interests in entities indirectly owning substantially all of its solar facilities and eight of its wind facilities; and an increase of $1.9 billion in other regulatory assets, deferred primarily related to AROs at Georgia Power. See Notes 2 and 15 to the financial statements under "Georgia PowerNuclear Construction" and "Southern PowerSales of Renewable Facility Interests," respectively, as well as Notes 6 and 8 to the financial statements and "Financing Activities" herein for additional information.
At the end of 2018, the market price of Southern Company's common stock was $43.92 per share (based on the closing price as reported on the NYSE) and the book value was $23.91 per share, representing a market-to-book value ratio of 184%, compared to $48.09, $23.99, and 201%, respectively, at the end of 2017.
Southern Company's consolidated ratio of common equity to total capitalization plus short-term debt was 32.5% and 31.5% at December 31, 2018 and 2017, respectively. See Note 8 to the financial statements for additional information.
Sources of Capital
Southern Company intends to meet its future capital needs through operating cash flows, borrowings from financial institutions, and debt and equity issuances in the capital markets. Equity capital can be provided from any combination of Southern Company's stock plans, private placements, or public offerings. The amount and timing of additional equity and debt issuances in 2019, as well as in subsequent years, will be contingent on Southern Company's investment opportunities and the Southern Company system's capital requirements and will depend upon prevailing market conditions and other factors. See "Capital Requirements and Contractual Obligations" herein for additional information.
Except as described herein, the traditional electric operating companies, Southern Power, and Southern Company Gas plan to obtain the funds required for construction and other purposes from operating cash flows, external security issuances, borrowings from financial institutions, and equity contributions or loans from Southern Company. Southern Power also plans to utilize tax equity partnership contributions, as well as funds resulting from its pending sale of Plant Mankato. However, the amount, type, and timing of any future financings, if needed, will depend upon prevailing market conditions, regulatory approval, and other factors. See Note 15 to the financial statements under "Southern PowerSales of Natural Gas Plants" herein for additional information.
In addition, in 2014, Georgia Power entered into the Loan Guarantee Agreement with the DOE, under which the proceeds of borrowings may be used to reimburse Georgia Power for Eligible Project Costs incurred in connection with its construction of Plant Vogtle Units 3 and 4. Under the Loan Guarantee Agreement, the DOE agreed to guarantee borrowings of up to $3.46 billion (not to exceed 70% of Eligible Project Costs) to be made by Georgia Power under a multi-advance credit facility (FFB Credit Facility) among Georgia Power, the DOE, and the FFB. At December 31, 2018, Georgia Power had borrowed $2.6 billion under

MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS (continued)
Southern Company and Subsidiary Companies 2018 Annual Report


the FFB Credit Facility. In July 2017, Georgia Power entered into an amendment to the Loan Guarantee Agreement, which provides that further advances are conditioned upon the DOE's approval of any agreements entered into in replacement of the Vogtle 3 and 4 Agreement and satisfaction of certain other conditions.
In September 2017, the DOE issued a conditional commitment to Georgia Power for up to approximately $1.67 billion of additional guaranteed loans under the Loan Guarantee Agreement. This conditional commitment expires on March 31, 2019, subject to any further extension approved by the DOE. Final approval and issuance of these additional loan guarantees by the DOE cannot be assured and are subject to the negotiation of definitive agreements, completion of due diligence by the DOE, receipt of any necessary regulatory approvals, and satisfaction of other conditions. See Note 8 to the financial statements under "Long-term DebtDOE Loan Guarantee Borrowings" for additional information regarding the Loan Guarantee Agreement, including applicable covenants, events of default, mandatory prepayment events (including any decision not to continue construction of Plant Vogtle Units 3 and 4), and additional conditions to borrowing. Also see Note 2 to the financial statements under "Georgia PowerNuclear Construction" for additional information regarding Plant Vogtle Units 3 and 4.
The issuance of securities by the traditional electric operating companies and Nicor Gas is generally subject to the approval of the applicable state PSC or other applicable state regulatory agency. The issuance of all securities by Mississippi Power and short-term securities by Georgia Power is generally subject to regulatory approval by the FERC. Additionally, with respect to the public offering of securities, Southern Company and certain of its subsidiaries file registration statements with the SEC under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (1933 Act). The amounts of securities authorized by the appropriate regulatory authorities, as well as the securities registered under the 1933 Act, are continuously monitored and appropriate filings are made to ensure flexibility in the capital markets.
Southern Company, each traditional electric operating company, and Southern Power generally obtain financing separately without credit support from any affiliate. The Southern Company system does not maintain a centralized cash or money pool. Therefore, funds of each company are not commingled with funds of any other company in the Southern Company system.
In addition, Southern Company Gas Capital obtains external financing for Southern Company Gas and its subsidiaries, other than Nicor Gas, which obtains financing separately without credit support from any affiliates. Nicor Gas' commercial paper program supports its working capital needs as Nicor Gas is not permitted to make money pool loans to affiliates. All of the other Southern Company Gas subsidiaries benefit from Southern Company Gas Capital's commercial paper program.
See Note 8 to the financial statements under "Bank Credit Arrangements" for additional information.
At December 31, 2018, Southern Company's current liabilities exceeded current assets by $4.7 billion, primarily due to $3.2 billion of long-term debt that is due within one year (including approximately $1.3 billion at the parent company, $0.2 billion at Alabama Power, $0.6 billion at Georgia Power, $0.6 billion at Southern Power, and $0.4 billion at Southern Company Gas) and $2.9 billion of notes payable (including approximately $1.8 billion at the parent company, $0.3 billion at Georgia Power, $0.1 billion at Southern Power, and $0.7 billion at Southern Company Gas). Subsequent to December 31, 2018, using proceeds from the sale of Gulf Power, the Southern Company parent entity repaid $0.7 billion of its long-term debt due within one year and all $1.8 billion of its notes payable at December 31, 2018. See "Financing Activities" herein for additional information. To meet short-term cash needs and contingencies, the Southern Company system has substantial cash flow from operating activities and access to capital markets and financial institutions. Southern Company, the traditional electric operating companies, Southern Power, and Southern Company Gas intend to utilize operating cash flows, as well as commercial paper, lines of credit, bank notes, and securities issuances, as market conditions permit, as well as, under certain circumstances for the traditional electric operating companies, Southern Power, and Southern Company Gas, equity contributions and/or loans from Southern Company to meet their short-term capital needs.

MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS (continued)
Southern Company and Subsidiary Companies 2018 Annual Report


At December 31, 2018, Southern Company and its subsidiaries had approximately $1.4 billion of cash and cash equivalents. Committed credit arrangements with banks at December 31, 2018 were as follows:
 Expires   Executable Term Loans Expires Within One Year
Company2019
2020
2022 Total 
Unused(d)
 
One
Year
 
Two
Years
 Term Out No Term Out
 (in millions)
Southern Company(a)
$
 $
 $2,000
 $2,000
 $1,999
 $
 $
 $
 $
Alabama Power33
 500
 800
 1,333
 1,333
 
 
 
 33
Georgia Power
 
 1,750
 1,750
 1,736
 
 
 
 
Mississippi Power100
 
 
 100
 100
 
 
 
 100
Southern Power(b)

 
 750
 750
 727
 
 
 
 
Southern Company Gas(c)

 
 1,900
 1,900
 1,895
 
 
 
 
Other30
 
 
 30
 30
 
 
 
 30
Southern Company Consolidated(e)
$163
 $500
 $7,200
 $7,863
 $7,820
 $
 $
 $
 $163
(a)Represents the Southern Company parent entity.
(b)Does not include Southern Power Company's $120 million continuing letter of credit facility for standby letters of credit expiring in 2021, of which $17 million was unused at December 31, 2018. Southern Power's subsidiaries are not parties to its bank credit arrangement.
(c)Southern Company Gas, as the parent entity, guarantees the obligations of Southern Company Gas Capital, which is the borrower of $1.4 billion of this arrangement. Southern Company Gas' committed credit arrangement also includes $500 million for which Nicor Gas is the borrower and which is restricted for working capital needs of Nicor Gas. Pursuant to this multi-year credit arrangement, the allocations between Southern Company Gas Capital and Nicor Gas may be adjusted.
(d)Amounts used are for letters of credit.
(e)
Excludes $280 million of committed credit arrangements of Gulf Power, which was sold on January 1, 2019. See Note 15 to the financial statements under "Southern Company's Sale of Gulf Power" for additional information.
See Note 8 to the financial statements under "Bank Credit Arrangements" for additional information.
Most of these bank credit arrangements, as well as the term loan arrangements of Alabama Power and Southern Power Company, contain covenants that limit debt levels and contain cross-acceleration or cross-default provisions to other indebtedness (including guarantee obligations) that are restricted only to the indebtedness of the individual company. Such cross-default provisions to other indebtedness would trigger an event of default if the applicable borrower defaulted on indebtedness or guarantee obligations over a specified threshold. Such cross-acceleration provisions to other indebtedness would trigger an event of default if the applicable borrower defaulted on indebtedness, the payment of which was then accelerated. At December 31, 2018, Southern Company, the traditional electric operating companies, Southern Power Company, Southern Company Gas, and Nicor Gas were in compliance with all such covenants. None of the bank credit arrangements contain material adverse change clauses at the time of borrowings.
Subject to applicable market conditions, Southern Company and its subsidiaries expect to renew or replace their bank credit arrangements as needed, prior to expiration. In connection therewith, Southern Company and its subsidiaries may extend the maturity dates and/or increase or decrease the lending commitments thereunder.
A portion of the unused credit with banks is allocated to provide liquidity support to the revenue bonds of the traditional electric operating companies and the commercial paper programs of Southern Company, the traditional electric operating companies, Southern Power Company, Southern Company Gas, and Nicor Gas. The amount of variable rate revenue bonds of the traditional electric operating companies outstanding requiring liquidity support at December 31, 2018 was approximately $1.6 billion, which included $82 million related to Gulf Power. In addition, at December 31, 2018, the traditional electric operating companies had approximately $403 million of revenue bonds outstanding that are required to be remarketed within the next 12 months, which included $58 million related to Gulf Power. See Note 15 to the financial statements under "Southern Company's Sale of Gulf Power" for information regarding the sale of Gulf Power on January 1, 2019. Subsequent to December 31, 2018, Georgia Power redeemed approximately $108 million of obligations related to outstanding variable rate pollution control revenue bonds.
Southern Company, Alabama Power, Georgia Power, Southern Power Company, Southern Company Gas, Nicor Gas, and SEGCO make short-term borrowings primarily through commercial paper programs that have the liquidity support of the committed bank credit arrangements described above. Short-term borrowings are included in notes payable in the balance sheets.

MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS (continued)
Southern Company and Subsidiary Companies 2018 Annual Report


Details of short-term borrowings were as follows:
 Short-term Debt at the End of the Period 
Short-term Debt During the Period (*)
 Amount Outstanding Weighted Average Interest Rate Average Amount Outstanding Weighted Average Interest Rate Maximum Amount Outstanding
 (in millions)   (in millions)   (in millions)
December 31, 2018:         
Commercial paper$1,064
 3.0% $1,655
 2.3% $3,042
Short-term bank debt1,851
 3.1% 1,722
 2.9% 2,504
Total$2,915
 3.1% $3,377
 2.6%  
December 31, 2017:         
Commercial paper$1,832
 1.8% $2,117
 1.3% $2,946
Short-term bank debt607
 2.3% 555
 2.1% 1,020
Total$2,439
 1.9% $2,672
 1.5%  
December 31, 2016:         
Commercial paper$1,909
 1.1% $976
 0.8% $1,970
Short-term bank debt123
 1.7% 176
 1.7% 500
Total$2,032
 1.1% $1,152
 1.1%  
(*)Average and maximum amounts are based upon daily balances during the 12-month periods ended December 31, 2018, 2017, and 2016.
In addition to the short-term borrowings of Southern Power Company included in the table above, at December 31, 2016, Southern Power Company subsidiaries assumed credit agreements (Project Credit Facilities) with the acquisition of certain solar facilities, which were non-recourse to Southern Power Company, the proceeds of which were used to finance project costs related to such solar facilities. The Project Credit Facilities were fully repaid in January 2017. For the year ended December 31, 2016, the Project Credit Facilities had a maximum amount outstanding of $828 million and an average amount outstanding of $566 million at a weighted average interest rate of 2.1% and had total amounts outstanding of $209 million at a weighted average interest rate of 2.1% at December 31, 2016.
Southern Company believes the need for working capital can be adequately met by utilizing commercial paper programs, lines of credit, bank term loans, and operating cash flows.
Financing Activities
During 2018, Southern Company issued approximately 11.6 million shares of common stock primarily through employee equity compensation plans and received proceeds of approximately $442 million.
In addition, during the third and fourth quarters 2018, Southern Company issued a total of approximately 12.1 million and 2.5 million shares, respectively, of common stock through at-the-market issuances pursuant to sales agency agreements related to Southern Company's continuous equity offering program and received cash proceeds of approximately $540 million and $108 million, respectively, net of $5 million and $1 million in commissions, respectively.

MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS (continued)
Southern Company and Subsidiary Companies 2018 Annual Report


The following table outlines the long-term debt financing activities for Southern Company and its subsidiaries for the year ended December 31, 2018:
Company
Senior
Note
Issuances
 
Senior Note
Maturities, Redemptions, and Repurchases
 
Revenue
Bond
Issuances and
Reofferings
of Purchased
Bonds
 
Revenue
Bond
Maturities, Redemptions,
 and Repurchases
 
Other
Long-Term
Debt
Issuances
 
Other
Long-Term
Debt
Redemptions
and
Maturities(a)
 (in millions)
Southern Company(b)
$750
 $1,000
 $
 $
 $
 $
Alabama Power500
 
 120
 120
 
 1
Georgia Power
 1,500
 108
 469
 
 111
Mississippi Power600
 155
 
 43
 
 900
Southern Power
 350
 
 
 
 420
Southern Company Gas
 155
 
 200
 300
 
Other(c)

 100
 
 
 100
 13
Elimination(d)

 
 
 
 
 (4)
Southern Company Consolidated$1,850
 $3,260
 $228
 $832
 $400
 $1,441
(a)Includes reductions in capital lease obligations resulting from cash payments under capital leases.
(b)Represents the Southern Company parent entity.
(c)
In November 2018, SEGCO, as borrower, and Alabama Power, as guarantor, entered into a $100 million long-term delayed draw floating rate bank term loan bearing interest based on three-month LIBOR, which SEGCO used to repay at maturity $100 million aggregate principal amount of Series 2013A Senior Notes due December 1, 2018. See Note 9 to the financial statements under "Guarantees" for additional information.
(d)Represents reductions in affiliate capital lease obligations at Georgia Power, which are eliminated in Southern Company's consolidated financial statements.
Except as otherwise described herein, Southern Company and its subsidiaries used the proceeds of debt issuances for their redemptions and maturities shown in the table above, to repay short-term indebtedness, and for general corporate purposes, including working capital. The subsidiaries also used the proceeds for their construction programs.
In March 2018, Southern Company entered into a $900 million short-term floating rate bank loan bearing interest based on one-month LIBOR, which was repaid in August 2018.
In April 2018, Southern Company borrowed $250 million pursuant to a short-term uncommitted bank credit arrangement, bearing interest at a rate agreed upon by Southern Company and the bank from time to time and payable on no less than 30 days' demand by the bank. Subsequent to December 31, 2018, Southern Company repaid this loan.
In June 2018, Southern Company repaid at maturity two $100 million short-term floating rate bank term loans.
In August 2018, Southern Company issued $750 million aggregate principal amount of Series 2018A Floating Rate Senior Notes due February 14, 2020 bearing interest based on three-month LIBOR, entered into a $1.5 billion short-term floating rate bank loan bearing interest based on one-month LIBOR, and repaid $250 million borrowed in August 2017 pursuant to a short-term uncommitted bank credit arrangement. Subsequent to December 31, 2018, Southern Company repaid the $1.5 billion short-term floating rate bank loan.
In the third quarter 2018, Southern Company repaid at maturity $500 million aggregate principal amount of 1.55% Senior Notes and $500 million aggregate principal amount of Series 2013A 2.45% Senior Notes.
Subsequent to December 31, 2018, through cash tender offers, Southern Company repurchased and retired approximately $522 million of the $1.0 billion aggregate principal amount outstanding of its 1.85% Senior Notes due July 1, 2019 (1.85% Notes), approximately $180 million of the $350 million aggregate principal amount outstanding of its Series 2014B 2.15% Senior Notes due September 1, 2019 (Series 2014B Notes), and approximately $504 million of the $750 million aggregate principal amount outstanding of its Series 2018A Floating Rate Notes due February 14, 2020 (Series 2018A Notes), for an aggregate purchase price, excluding accrued and unpaid interest, of approximately $1.2 billion. In addition, subsequent to December 31, 2018, and following the completion of the cash tender offers, Southern Company completed the redemption of all of the Series 2018A Notes remaining outstanding and called for redemption all of the 1.85% Notes and Series 2014B Notes remaining outstanding.

MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS (continued)
Southern Company and Subsidiary Companies 2018 Annual Report


Subsequent to December 31, 2018, Alabama Power repaid at maturity $200 million aggregate principal amount of Series Z 5.125% Senior Notes.
In January 2018, Georgia Power repaid its outstanding $150 million short-term floating rate bank loan due May 31, 2018.
In May 2018, through cash tender offers, Georgia Power repurchased and retired $89 million of the $250 million aggregate principal amount outstanding of its Series 2007A 5.65% Senior Notes due March 1, 2037, $326 million of the $500 million aggregate principal amount outstanding of its Series 2009A 5.95% Senior Notes due February 1, 2039, and $335 million of the $600 million aggregate principal amount outstanding of its Series 2010B 5.40% Senior Notes due June 1, 2040, for an aggregate purchase price, excluding accrued and unpaid interest, of $902 million.
Subsequent to December 31, 2018, Georgia Power redeemed approximately $13 million, $20 million, and $75 million aggregate principal amount of Development Authority of Burke County (Georgia) Pollution Control Revenue Bonds (Georgia Power Company Plant Vogtle Project), First Series 1992, Eighth Series 1994, and Second Series 1995, respectively.
In March 2018, Mississippi Power entered into a $300 million short-term floating rate bank loan bearing interest based on one-month LIBOR, of which $200 million was repaid in the second quarter 2018 and $100 million was repaid in the third quarter 2018. The proceeds of this loan, together with the proceeds of Mississippi Power's $600 million senior notes issuances, were used to repay Mississippi Power's $900 million unsecured floating rate term loan.
In October 2018, Mississippi Power completed the redemption of all 334,210 outstanding shares of its preferred stock (as well as related depositary shares), with an aggregate par value of approximately $33.4 million.
In May 2018, Southern Power entered into two short-term floating rate bank loans, each for an aggregate principal amount of $100 million, which bear interest based on one-month LIBOR. In November 2018, Southern Power repaid one of these short-term loans.
During 2018, Southern Power received approximately $148 million of third-party tax equity related to certain of its renewable facilities. See Note 15 to the financial statements under "Southern Power" for additional information.
Prior to its sale, in the second quarter 2018, Pivotal Utility Holdings caused $200 million aggregate principal amount of gas facility revenue bonds to be redeemed.
In May 2018, Southern Company Gas Capital borrowed $95 million pursuant to a short-term uncommitted bank credit arrangement, guaranteed by Southern Company Gas, bearing interest at a rate agreed upon by Southern Company Gas Capital and the bank from time to time and payable on no less than 30 days' demand by the bank. In July 2018, Southern Company Gas Capital repaid this loan.
Other long-term debt issuances for Southern Company Gas include the issuance by Nicor Gas of $300 million aggregate principal amount of first mortgage bonds in a private placement, of which $100 million was issued in August 2018 and $200 million was issued in November 2018.
In addition to any financings that may be necessary to meet capital requirements and contractual obligations, Southern Company and its subsidiaries plan to continue, when economically feasible, a program to retire higher-cost securities and replace these obligations with lower-cost capital if market conditions permit.
Credit Rating Risk
At December 31, 2018, Southern Company and its subsidiaries did not have any credit arrangements that would require material changes in payment schedules or terminations as a result of a credit rating downgrade.
There are certain contracts that could require collateral, but not accelerated payment, in the event of a credit rating change of certain subsidiaries to BBB and/or Baa2 or below. These contracts are for physical electricity and natural gas purchases and sales, fuel purchases, fuel transportation and storage, energy price risk management, transmission, interest rate management, and construction of new generation at Plant Vogtle Units 3 and 4.

MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS (continued)
Southern Company and Subsidiary Companies 2018 Annual Report


The maximum potential collateral requirements under these contracts at December 31, 2018 were as follows:
Credit Ratings
Maximum
Potential
Collateral
Requirements(a)
 (in millions)
At BBB and/or Baa2$30
At BBB- and/or Baa3$542
At BB+ and/or Ba1(b)
$2,176
(a)
Includes potential collateral requirements related to Gulf Power of $111 million and $221 million at a credit rating of BBB- and/or Baa3 and BB+ and/or Ba1, respectively. See Note 15 to the financial statements under "Southern Company's Sale of Gulf Power" for information regarding the sale of Gulf Power on January 1, 2019.
(b)Any additional credit rating downgrades at or below BB- and/or Ba3 could increase collateral requirements up to an additional $38 million.
Generally, collateral may be provided by a Southern Company guaranty, letter of credit, or cash. Additionally, a credit rating downgrade could impact the ability of Southern Company and its subsidiaries to access capital markets and would be likely to impact the cost at which they do so.
On February 26, 2018, Moody's revised its rating outlook for Mississippi Power from stable to positive. On August 8, 2018, Moody's upgraded Mississippi Power's senior unsecured rating to Baa3 from Ba1 and maintained the positive rating outlook.
On February 28, 2018, Fitch removed Mississippi Power from rating watch negative and revised its rating outlook from stable to positive.
Also on February 28, 2018, Fitch downgraded the senior unsecured long-term debt rating of Southern Company to BBB+ from A- with a stable outlook and of Georgia Power to A from A+ with a negative outlook. On August 9, 2018, Fitch downgraded the senior unsecured long-term debt rating of Georgia Power to A- from A.
On March 14, 2018, S&P upgraded the senior unsecured long-term debt rating of Mississippi Power to A- from BBB+. The outlook remained negative.
On August 8, 2018, Moody's downgraded the senior unsecured debt rating of Georgia Power to Baa1 from A3.
On September 28, 2018, Moody's revised its rating outlooks for Southern Company, Alabama Power, and Georgia Power from negative to stable.
Also on September 28, 2018, Fitch assigned a negative rating outlook to the ratings of Southern Company and its subsidiaries (excluding Mississippi Power).
As a result of the Tax Reform Legislation, certain financial metrics, such as the funds from operations to debt percentage, used by the credit rating agencies to assess Southern Company and its subsidiaries may be negatively impacted. Southern Company and most of its regulated subsidiaries have taken actions to mitigate the resulting impacts, which, among other alternatives, include adjusting capital structure. Absent actions by Southern Company and its subsidiaries that fully mitigate the impacts, the credit ratings of Southern Company and certain of its subsidiaries could be negatively affected. See Note 2 to the financial statements for additional information related to state PSC or other regulatory agency actions related to the Tax Reform Legislation, including approvals of capital structure adjustments for Alabama Power, Georgia Power, and Atlanta Gas Light by their respective state PSCs, which are expected to help mitigate the potential adverse impacts to certain of their credit metrics.
Market Price Risk
The Southern Company system is exposed to market risks, including commodity price risk, interest rate risk, weather risk, and occasionally foreign currency exchange rate risk. To manage the volatility attributable to these exposures, the applicable company nets the exposures, where possible, to take advantage of natural offsets and enters into various derivative transactions for the remaining exposures pursuant to the applicable company's policies in areas such as counterparty exposure and risk management practices. Southern Company Gas' wholesale gas operations use various contracts in its commercial activities that generally meet the definition of derivatives. For the traditional electric operating companies, Southern Power, and Southern Company Gas' other businesses, each company's policy is that derivatives are to be used primarily for hedging purposes and mandates strict adherence to all applicable risk management policies. Derivative positions are monitored using techniques including, but not limited to, market valuation, value at risk, stress testing, and sensitivity analysis.

MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS (continued)
Southern Company and Subsidiary Companies 2018 Annual Report


To mitigate future exposure to a change in interest rates, Southern Company and certain of its subsidiaries enter into derivatives that have been designated as hedges. Derivatives that have been designated as hedges outstanding at December 31, 2018 have a notional amount of $2.0 billion and are intended to mitigate interest rate volatility related to existing fixed rate obligations. The weighted average interest rate on $5.8 billion of long-term variable interest rate exposure at December 31, 2018 was 3.02%. If Southern Company sustained a 100 basis point change in interest rates for all long-term variable interest rate exposure, the change would affect annualized interest expense by approximately $58 million at December 31, 2018. See Note 1 to the financial statements under "Financial Instruments" and Note 14 to the financial statements for additional information.
Southern Power Company had foreign currency denominated debt of €1.1 billion at December 31, 2018. Southern Power Company has mitigated its exposure to foreign currency exchange rate risk through the use of foreign currency swaps converting all interest and principal payments to fixed-rate U.S. dollars.
Due to cost-based rate regulation and other various cost recovery mechanisms, the traditional electric operating companies and natural gas distribution utilities continue to have limited exposure to market volatility in interest rates, foreign currency exchange rates, commodity fuel prices, and prices of electricity. In addition, Southern Power's exposure to market volatility in commodity fuel prices and prices of electricity is limited because its long-term sales contracts shift substantially all fuel cost responsibility to the purchaser. However, Southern Power has been and may continue to be exposed to market volatility in energy-related commodity prices as a result of uncontracted generating capacity. To mitigate residual risks relative to movements in electricity prices, the traditional electric operating companies and Southern Power may enter into physical fixed-price contracts for the purchase and sale of electricity through the wholesale electricity market and, to a lesser extent, financial hedge contracts for natural gas purchases; however, a significant portion of contracts are priced at market. The traditional electric operating companies and certain of the natural gas distribution utilities manage fuel-hedging programs implemented per the guidelines of their respective state PSCs or other applicable state regulatory agencies. Southern Company had no material change in market risk exposure for the year ended December 31, 2018 when compared to the year ended December 31, 2017.
The changes in fair value of energy-related derivative contracts are substantially attributable to both the volume and the price of natural gas. For the years ended December 31, the changes in fair value of energy-related derivative contracts, the majority of which are composed of regulatory hedges, were as follows:
 2018 2017
 (in millions)
Contracts outstanding at the beginning of the period, assets (liabilities), net$(163) $41
Contracts realized or settled93
 (8)
Current period changes(a)
(131) (196)
Contracts outstanding at the end of the period, assets (liabilities), net(b)(c)
$(201) $(163)
(a)Current period changes also include the changes in fair value of new contracts entered into during the period, if any.
(b)Excludes premium and intrinsic value associated with weather derivatives of $8 million and $11 million at December 31, 2018 and 2017, respectively.
(c)
Includes $6 million of net liabilities related to Gulf Power. See Note 15 to the financial statements under "Southern Company's Sale of Gulf Power" for information regarding the sale of Gulf Power on January 1, 2019.
The net hedge volumes of energy-related derivative contracts were 431 million mmBtu and 621 million mmBtu at December 31, 2018 and 2017, respectively.
For the traditional electric operating companies and Southern Power, the weighted average swap contract cost above market prices was approximately $0.12 per mmBtu at December 31, 2018 and $0.15 per mmBtu at December 31, 2017. The majority of the natural gas hedge gains and losses are recovered through the traditional electric operating companies' fuel cost recovery clauses.
At December 31, 2018 and 2017, a portion of the Southern Company system's energy-related derivative contracts were designated as regulatory hedges and were related to the applicable company's fuel-hedging program. Therefore, gains and losses are initially recorded as regulatory liabilities and assets, respectively, and then are included in fuel expense as they are recovered through the energy cost recovery clause. Certain other gains and losses on energy-related derivatives, designated as cash flow hedges, are initially deferred in OCI before being recognized in income in the same period as the hedged transaction. Gains and losses on energy-related derivative contracts that are not designated or fail to qualify as hedges are recognized in the statements of income as incurred. See Note 14 to the financial statements for additional information.
The Southern Company system uses exchange-traded market-observable contracts, which are categorized as Level 1 of the fair value hierarchy, and over-the-counter contracts that are not exchange traded but are fair valued using prices which are market

MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS (continued)
Southern Company and Subsidiary Companies 2018 Annual Report


observable, and thus fall into Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy. See Note 13 to the financial statements for further discussion of fair value measurements. The maturities of the energy-related derivative contracts at December 31, 2018 were as follows:
 Fair Value Measurements
 December 31, 2018
 
Total
Fair Value
 Maturity
  Year 1 Years 2&3 Years 4&5
 (in millions)
Level 1$(179) $(59) $(86) $(34)
Level 2(22) 20
 (17) (25)
Level 3
 
 
 
Fair value of contracts outstanding at end of period$(201) $(39) $(103) $(59)
The Southern Company system is exposed to market price risk in the event of nonperformance by counterparties to energy-related and interest rate derivative contracts. The Southern Company system only enters into agreements and material transactions with counterparties that have investment grade credit ratings by Moody's and S&P, or with counterparties who have posted collateral to cover potential credit exposure. Therefore, the Southern Company system does not anticipate market risk exposure from nonperformance by the counterparties. For additional information, see Note 1 to the financial statements under "Financial Instruments" and Note 14 to the financial statements.
With the exception of Southern Company Gas' subsidiary, Atlanta Gas Light, and the Southern Company Gas wholesale gas services business, the Southern Company system is not exposed to concentrations of credit risk. Concentration of credit risk occurs at Atlanta Gas Light for amounts billed for services and other costs to its customers, which consist of 15 Marketers in Georgia responsible for the retail sale of natural gas to end-use customers in Georgia. For 2018, the four largest Marketers based on customer count, which includes SouthStar, accounted for 20% of Southern Company Gas' adjusted operating margin. Southern Company Gas' wholesale gas services business has a concentration of credit risk for services it provides to its counterparties as measured by its 30-day receivable exposure plus forward exposure. At December 31, 2018, Southern Company Gas' wholesale gas services business' top 20 counterparties represented approximately 48%, or $298 million, of its total counterparty exposure and had a weighted average S&P equivalent credit rating of A-, all of which is netconsistent with the prior year.
Southern Company performs periodic reviews of its leveraged lease transactions, both domestic and international, and the creditworthiness of the Guarantee Settlement Agreement payments lesslessees, including a review of the Customer Refunds.value of the underlying leased assets and the credit ratings of the lessees. Southern Company's domestic lease transactions generally do not have any credit enhancement mechanisms; however, the lessees in its international lease transactions have pledged various deposits as additional security to secure the obligations. The lessees in Southern Company's international lease transactions are also required to provide additional collateral in the event of a credit downgrade below a certain level.
Capital Requirements and Contractual Obligations
The Southern Company estimates that its financing costssystem's construction program is currently estimated to total approximately $8.0 billion for 2019, $7.7 billion for 2020, $6.7 billion for 2021, $6.3 billion for 2022, and $6.0 billion for 2023. These amounts include expenditures of approximately $1.5 billion, $1.2 billion, $1.0 billion, and $0.5 billion for the construction of Plant Vogtle Units 3 and 4 in 2019, 2020, 2021, and 2022, respectively. These amounts do not include up to approximately $0.5 billion per year on average for 2019 through 2023 for Southern Power's planned expenditures for plant acquisitions and placeholder growth. These amounts also include capital expenditures related to contractual purchase commitments for nuclear fuel and capital expenditures covered under LTSAs. Estimated capital expenditures to comply with environmental laws and regulations included in these amounts are $0.5 billion, $0.2 billion, $0.3 billion, $0.3 billion, and $0.2 billion for 2019, 2020, 2021, 2022, and 2023, respectively. These estimated expenditures do not include any potential compliance costs associated with pending regulation of CO2 emissions from fossil fuel-fired electric generating units. See FUTURE EARNINGS POTENTIAL – "Environmental MattersEnvironmental Laws and Regulations" and " – Global Climate Issues" herein for additional information.
The traditional electric operating companies also anticipate costs associated with closure and monitoring of ash ponds in accordance with the CCR Rule, which are reflected in Southern Company's ARO liabilities. These costs, which are expected to change and could change materially as underlying assumptions are refined and the cost and the method and timing of compliance activities continue to be evaluated, are currently estimated to be approximately $0.5 billion, $0.5 billion, $0.7 billion, $0.9 billion, and $0.9 billion for 2019, 2020, 2021, 2022, and 2023, respectively. See FUTURE EARNINGS POTENTIAL – "Environmental

MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS (continued)
Southern Company and Subsidiary Companies 2018 Annual Report


MattersEnvironmental Laws and RegulationsCoal Combustion Residuals" herein and Note 6 to the financial statements for additional information.
The construction programs are subject to periodic review and revision, and actual construction costs may vary from these estimates because of numerous factors. These factors include: changes in business conditions; changes in load projections; changes in environmental laws and regulations; the outcome of any legal challenges to environmental rules; changes in electric generating plants, including unit retirements and replacements and adding or changing fuel sources at existing electric generating units, to meet regulatory requirements; changes in FERC rules and regulations; state regulatory agency approvals; changes in the expected environmental compliance program; changes in legislation; the cost and efficiency of construction labor, equipment, and materials; project scope and design changes; storm impacts; and the cost of capital. In addition, there can be no assurance that costs related to capital expenditures will total approximately $3.1be fully recovered. Additionally, planned expenditures for plant acquisitions may vary due to market opportunities and Southern Power's ability to execute its growth strategy. See Note 15 to the financial statements under "Southern Power" for additional information regarding Southern Power's plant acquisitions.
The construction program also includes Plant Vogtle Units 3 and 4, which includes components based on new technology that only recently began initial operation in the global nuclear industry at this scale and which may be subject to additional revised cost estimates during construction. The ability to control costs and avoid cost and schedule overruns during the development, construction, and operation of new facilities is subject to a number of factors, including, but not limited to, changes in labor costs, availability, and productivity; challenges with management of contractors, subcontractors, or vendors; adverse weather conditions; shortages, increased costs, or inconsistent quality of equipment, materials, and labor; contractor or supplier delay; non-performance under construction, operating, or other agreements; operational readiness, including specialized operator training and required site safety programs; engineering or design problems; design and other licensing-based compliance matters, including the timely resolution of ITAAC and the related approvals by the NRC; challenges with start-up activities, including major equipment failure and system integration; and/or operational performance. See Note 2 to the financial statements under "Georgia PowerNuclear Construction" for information regarding Plant Vogtle Units 3 and 4 and additional factors that may impact construction expenditures.
As a result of NRC requirements, Alabama Power and Georgia Power have external trust funds for nuclear decommissioning costs; however, Alabama Power currently has no additional funding requirements. For additional information, see Note 6 to the financial statements under "Nuclear Decommissioning."
In addition, as discussed in Note 11 to the financial statements, the Southern Company system provides postretirement benefits to the majority of its employees and funds trusts to the extent required by PSCs, other applicable state regulatory agencies, or the FERC.
Funding requirements related to obligations associated with scheduled maturities of long-term debt, as well as the related interest, derivative obligations, preferred stock dividends of subsidiaries, leases, pipeline charges, storage capacity, gas supply, asset management agreements, other purchase commitments, ARO settlements, and trusts are detailed in the contractual obligations table that follows. See Notes 1, 6, 8, 9, 11, and 14 to the financial statements for additional information.

MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS (continued)
Southern Company and Subsidiary Companies 2018 Annual Report


Contractual Obligations
The Southern Company system's contractual obligations at December 31, 2018 (excluding Gulf Power) were as follows:
 2019 2020- 2021 2022- 2023 After 2023 Total
 (in millions)
Long-term debt(a) —
         
Principal$3,133
 $7,204
 $4,354
 $28,950
 $43,641
Interest1,668
 3,082
 2,270
 25,796
 32,816
Preferred stock dividends of subsidiaries(b)
15
 29
 29
 
 73
Financial derivative obligations(c)
610
 243
 109
 
 962
Operating leases(d)
156
 244
 177
 1,040
 1,617
Capital leases(d)
25
 22
 8
 143
 198
Pipeline charges, storage capacity, and gas supply(e)
781
 1,104
 901
 1,871
 4,657
Asset management agreements(f)
10
 8
 
 
 18
Purchase commitments 
        

Capital(g)
7,600
 13,608
 11,486
 
 32,694
Fuel(h)
3,168
 3,854
 1,863
 5,862
 14,747
Purchased power(i)
304
 653
 545
 2,494
 3,996
Other(j)
328
 642
 464
 2,265
 3,699
ARO settlements(k)
451
 1,186
 1,841
 
 3,478
Trusts —        

Nuclear decommissioning(l)
5
 11
 11
 88
 115
Pension and other postretirement benefit plans(m)
137
 265
 
 
 402
Total$18,391
 $32,155
 $24,058
 $68,509
 $143,113
(a)
All amounts are reflected based on final maturity dates except for amounts related to FFB borrowings and certain revenue bonds. As it relates to the FFB borrowings, the final maturity date is February 20, 2044; however, principal amortization is reflected beginning in 2020. See Note 8 to the financial statements under "Long-term DebtDOE Loan Guarantee Borrowings" and "Securities Due Within One Year" for additional information. Southern Company and its subsidiaries plan to continue, when economically feasible, to retire higher-cost securities and replace these obligations with lower-cost capital if market conditions permit. Variable rate interest obligations are estimated based on rates at December 31, 2018, as reflected in the statements of capitalization. Fixed rates include, where applicable, the effects of interest rate derivatives employed to manage interest rate risk. Long-term debt excludes capital lease amounts (shown separately).
(b)Represents preferred stock of Alabama Power. Preferred stock does not mature; therefore, amounts are provided for the next five years only.
(c)See Notes 1 and 14 to the financial statements.
(d)Excludes PPAs that are accounted for as leases and included in "Purchased power."
(e)Includes charges recoverable through a natural gas cost recovery mechanism, or alternatively billed to Marketers selling retail natural gas, and demand charges associated with Southern Company Gas' wholesale gas services. The gas supply balance includes amounts for gas commodity purchase commitments associated with Southern Company Gas' gas marketing services of 47 million mmBtu at floating gas prices calculated using forward natural gas prices at December 31, 2018 and valued at $150 million. Southern Company Gas provides guarantees to certain gas suppliers for certain of its subsidiaries in support of payment obligations.
(f)Represents fixed-fee minimum payments for asset management agreements associated with wholesale gas services.
(g)
The Southern Company system provides estimated capital expenditures for a five-year period, including capital expenditures associated with environmental regulations. These amounts exclude contractual purchase commitments for nuclear fuel, capital expenditures covered under LTSAs, and estimated capital expenditures for AROs, which are reflected in "Fuel," "Other," and "ARO settlements," respectively. These amounts also exclude up to approximately $0.5 billion per year on average for 2019 through 2023 for Southern Power's planned expenditures for plant acquisitions and placeholder growth. At December 31, 2018, significant purchase commitments were outstanding in connection with the construction program. See FUTURE EARNINGS POTENTIAL – "Environmental MattersEnvironmental Laws and Regulations" and "Construction Programs" herein for additional information.
(h)Primarily includes commitments to purchase coal, nuclear fuel, and natural gas, as well as the related transportation and storage. In most cases, these contracts contain provisions for price escalation, minimum purchase levels, and other financial commitments. Natural gas purchase commitments are based on various indices at the time of delivery. Amounts reflected for natural gas purchase commitments have been estimated based on the NYMEX future prices at December 31, 2018.
(i)
Estimated minimum long-term obligations for various PPA purchases from gas-fired, biomass, and wind-powered facilities and capacity payments related to Plant Vogtle Units 1 and 2. See Note 9 to the financial statements under "Fuel and Power Purchase Agreements" for additional information.

MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS (continued)
Southern Company and Subsidiary Companies 2018 Annual Report


(j)Includes LTSAs, contracts for the procurement of limestone, contractual environmental remediation liabilities, and operation and maintenance agreements. LTSAs include price escalation based on inflation indices.
(k)
Represents estimated costs for a five-year period associated with closing and monitoring ash ponds in accordance with the CCR Rule and the related state rules, which are reflected in Southern Company's ARO liabilities. Material expenditures in future years for ARO settlements also will be required for ash ponds, nuclear decommissioning, and other liabilities reflected in Southern Company's AROs. See FUTURE EARNINGS POTENTIAL – "Environmental MattersEnvironmental Laws and RegulationsCoal Combustion Residuals" herein and Note 6 to the financial statements for additional information.
(l)
Projections of nuclear decommissioning trust fund contributions for Plant Hatch and Plant Vogtle Units 1 and 2 are based on the 2013 ARP for Georgia Power. Alabama Power also has external trust funds for nuclear decommissioning costs; however, Alabama Power currently has no additional funding requirements. See Note 6 to the financial statements under "Nuclear Decommissioning" for additional information.
(m)The Southern Company system forecasts contributions to the pension and other postretirement benefit plans over a three-year period. Southern Company anticipates no mandatory contributions to the qualified pension plans during the next three years. Amounts presented represent estimated benefit payments for the nonqualified pension plans, estimated non-trust benefit payments for the other postretirement benefit plans, and estimated contributions to the other postretirement benefit plan trusts, all of which will be made from corporate assets of Southern Company's subsidiaries. See Note 11 to the financial statements for additional information related to the pension and other postretirement benefit plans, including estimated benefit payments. Certain benefit payments will be made through the related benefit plans. Other benefit payments will be made from corporate assets of Southern Company's subsidiaries.

MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
Alabama Power Company 2018 Annual Report



OVERVIEW
Business Activities
Alabama Power operates as a vertically integrated utility providing electric service to retail and wholesale customers within its traditional service territory located in the State of Alabama in addition to wholesale customers in the Southeast.
Many factors affect the opportunities, challenges, and risks of Alabama Power's business of providing electric service. These factors include the ability to maintain a constructive regulatory environment, to maintain and grow energy sales and customers, and to effectively manage and secure timely recovery of costs. These costs include those related to projected long-term demand growth, stringent environmental standards, including CCR rules, reliability, fuel, capital expenditures, including improving the electric transmission and distribution systems, and restoration following major storms. Alabama Power has various regulatory mechanisms that operate to address cost recovery. Effectively operating pursuant to these regulatory mechanisms and appropriately balancing required costs and capital expenditures with customer prices will continue to challenge Alabama Power for the foreseeable future. On May 1, 2018, the Alabama PSC approved modifications to Rate RSE and other commitments designed to position Alabama Power to address the retail rate impact and the growing pressure on its credit quality resulting from the Tax Reform Legislation. See FUTURE EARNINGS POTENTIAL – "Retail Regulatory Matters" and FINANCIAL CONDITION AND LIQUIDITY – "Credit Rating Risk" herein for additional information.
Alabama Power continues to focus on several key performance indicators including, but not limited to, customer satisfaction, plant availability, system reliability, and net income after dividends on preferred stock. Alabama Power's financial success is directly tied to customer satisfaction. Key elements of ensuring customer satisfaction include outstanding service, high reliability, and competitive prices. Management uses customer satisfaction surveys to evaluate Alabama Power's results and generally targets the top quartile of these surveys in measuring performance.
See RESULTS OF OPERATIONS herein for information on Alabama Power's financial performance.
Earnings
Alabama Power's 2018 net income after dividends on preferred and preference stock was $930 million, representing an $82 million, or 9.7%, increase over the previous year. The increase was primarily due to a decrease in income tax expense, partially offset by a decrease in retail revenues associated with customer bill credits related to the Tax Reform Legislation. The increase also reflects an increase in revenues associated with colder weather in the first quarter 2018 and warmer weather in the second and third quarters 2018 compared to the corresponding periods in 2017, partially offset by an accrual for a Rate RSE refund. See FUTURE EARNINGS POTENTIAL – "Retail Regulatory Matters – Rate RSE" herein for additional information.
Alabama Power's 2017 net income after dividends on preferred and preference stock was $848 million, representing a $26 million, or 3.2%, increase over the previous year. The increase was primarily due to an increase in rates under Rate RSE effective in January 2017 and the impact of a Rate RSE refund recorded in 2016. These increases to income were partially offset by a decrease in retail revenues associated with milder weather, lower customer usage, and an increase in non-fuel operations and maintenance expenses in 2017 as compared to 2016. See FUTURE EARNINGS POTENTIAL – "Retail Regulatory Matters – Rate RSE" herein for additional information.

MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS (continued)
Alabama Power Company 2018 Annual Report

RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
A condensed income statement for Alabama Power follows:
 Amount 
Increase (Decrease)
from Prior Year
 2018 2018 2017
 (in millions)
Operating revenues$6,032
 $(7) $150
Fuel1,301
 76
 (72)
Purchased power432
 104
 (6)
Other operations and maintenance1,669
 (40) 152
Depreciation and amortization764
 28
 33
Taxes other than income taxes389
 5
 4
Total operating expenses4,555
 173
 111
Operating income1,477
 (180) 39
Allowance for equity funds used during construction62
 23
 11
Interest expense, net of amounts capitalized323
 18
 3
Other income (expense), net20
 (23) 17
Income taxes291
 (277) 37
Net income945
 79
 27
Dividends on preferred and preference stock15
 (3) 1
Net income after dividends on preferred and preference stock$930
 $82
 $26
Operating Revenues
Operating revenues for 2018 were $6.0 billion, reflecting a $7 million decrease from 2017. Details of operating revenues were as follows:
 2018 2017
 (in millions)
Retail — prior year$5,458
 $5,322
Estimated change resulting from —   
Rates and pricing(354) 362
Sales decline(10) (44)
Weather137
 (89)
Fuel and other cost recovery136
 (93)
Retail — current year5,367
 5,458
Wholesale revenues —   
Non-affiliates279
 276
Affiliates119
 97
Total wholesale revenues398
 373
Other operating revenues267
 208
Total operating revenues$6,032
 $6,039
Percent change(0.1)% 2.6%
Retail revenues in 2018 were $5.4 billion. These revenues decreased $91 million, or 1.7%, in 2018 as compared to the prior year. The decrease in 2018 was primarily due to customer bill credits related to the Tax Reform Legislation and an accrual for a Rate RSE refund, partially offset by an increase in fuel revenues and colder weather in the first quarter and warmer weather in the second and third quarters 2018 as compared to the corresponding periods in 2017.

MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS (continued)
Alabama Power Company 2018 Annual Report

Retail revenues in 2017 were $5.5 billion. These revenues increased $136 million, or 2.6%, in 2017 as compared to the prior year. The increase in 2017 was primarily due to an increase in rates under Rate RSE effective in January 2017, partially offset by a decrease in fuel revenues and milder weather in the first and third quarters 2017 as compared to the corresponding periods in 2016.
See Note 2 to the financial statements under "Alabama Power – Rate RSE" for additional information. See "Energy Sales" herein for a discussion of changes in the volume of energy sold, including changes related to sales decline and weather.
Electric rates include provisions to recognize the recovery of fuel costs, purchased power costs, PPAs certificated by the Alabama PSC, and costs associated with the natural disaster reserve. Under these provisions, fuel and other cost recovery revenues generally equal fuel and other cost recovery expenses and do not affect net income. See FUTURE EARNINGS POTENTIAL – "Retail Regulatory Matters – Rate ECR" herein for additional information.
Wholesale revenues from power sales to non-affiliated utilities were as follows:
 2018 2017 2016
 (in millions)
Capacity and other$101
 $96
 $93
Energy178
 180
 190
Total non-affiliated$279
 $276
 $283
Wholesale revenues from sales to non-affiliates will vary depending on fuel prices, the market prices of wholesale energy compared to the cost of Alabama Power's and the Southern Company system's generation, demand for energy within the Southern Company system's electric service territory, and availability of the Southern Company system's generation. Increases and decreases in energy revenues that are driven by fuel prices are accompanied by an increase or decrease in fuel costs and do not affect net income. Short-term opportunity energy sales are also included in wholesale energy sales to non-affiliates. These opportunity sales are made at market-based rates that generally provide a margin above Alabama Power's variable cost to produce the energy.
In 2018, wholesale revenues from sales to non-affiliates increased $3 million, or 1.1%, as compared to the prior year. In 2017, wholesale revenues from sales to non-affiliates decreased $7 million, or 2.5%, as compared to the prior year.
Wholesale revenues from sales to affiliated companies will vary depending on demand and the availability and cost of generating resources at each company. These affiliate sales and purchases are made in accordance with the IIC, as approved by the FERC. These transactions do not have a significant impact on earnings since this energy is generally sold at marginal cost and energy purchases are generally offset by energy revenues through Alabama Power's energy cost recovery clause.
In 2018, wholesale revenues from sales to affiliates increased $22 million, or 22.7%, as compared to the prior year. In 2018, the price of energy increased 12.3% as a result of higher natural gas prices and KWH sales increased 10.0% primarily due to an increase in hydro generation. In 2017, wholesale revenues from sales to affiliates increased $28 million, or 40.6%, as compared to the prior year. In 2017, KWH sales increased 31.1% as a result of supporting Southern Company system transmission reliability and a 6.9% increase in the price of energy primarily due to higher natural gas prices.
In 2018, other operating revenues increased $59 million, or 28.4%, as compared to the prior year primarily due to revenues related to unregulated sales of products and services that were reclassified as other revenues as a result of the adoption of ASC 606, Revenue from Contracts with Customers (ASC 606). In prior periods, these revenues were included in other income (expense), net. See Note 1 to the financial statements for additional information regarding Alabama Power's adoption of ASC 606. This increase was partially offset by decreases in open access transmission tariff revenues primarily due to a lower rate related to the Tax Reform Legislation.

MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS (continued)
Alabama Power Company 2018 Annual Report

Energy Sales
Changes in revenues are influenced heavily by the change in the volume of energy sold from year to year. KWH sales for 2018 and the percent change from the prior year were as follows:
 
Total
KWHs
 
Total KWH
Percent Change
 
Weather-Adjusted
Percent Change
 2018 2018 2017 2018 2017
 (in billions)        
Residential18.6
 8.2% (6.1)% (0.4)% (1.2)%
Commercial13.9
 1.9
 (3.4) (1.0) (1.3)
Industrial23.0
 1.4
 1.7
 1.4
 1.7
Other0.2
 (5.7) (5.0) (5.7) (5.0)
Total retail55.7
 3.7
 (2.3) 0.2 % (0.1)%
Wholesale         
Non-affiliates5.0
 (8.7) (6.5)    
Affiliates4.6
 9.6
 31.1
    
Total wholesale9.6
 (0.9) 6.6
    
Total energy sales65.3
 3.0% (1.0)%    
Changes in retail energy sales are generally the result of changes in electricity usage by customers, changes in weather, and changes in the number of customers. Retail energy sales in 2018 were 3.7% higher than in 2017. Residential sales and commercial sales increased 8.2% and 1.9% in 2018, respectively, primarily due to colder weather in the first quarter and warmer weather in the second and third quarters 2018 as compared to the corresponding periods in 2017. Weather-adjusted residential sales were 0.4% lower in 2018 primarily due to lower customer usage resulting from an increase in penetration of energy-efficient residential appliances. Weather-adjusted commercial sales were 1.0% lower in 2018 primarily due to lower customer usage resulting from customer initiatives in energy savings and an ongoing migration to the electronic commerce business model. Industrial sales increased 1.4% in 2018 as compared to 2017 as a result of an increase in demand resulting from changes in production levels primarily in the primary metals, pipelines, and mining sectors offset by the paper sector.
Retail energy sales in 2017 were 2.3% lower than in 2016. Residential sales and commercial sales decreased 6.1% and 3.4% in 2017, respectively, primarily due to milder weather in the first and third quarters 2017 as compared to the corresponding periods in 2016. Weather-adjusted residential sales were 1.2% lower in 2017 primarily due to lower customer usage resulting from an increase in penetration of energy-efficient residential appliances, partially offset by customer growth. Weather-adjusted commercial sales were 1.3% lower in 2017 primarily due to lower customer usage resulting from customer initiatives in energy savings and an ongoing migration to the electronic commerce business model, partially offset by customer growth. Industrial sales increased 1.7% in 2017 as compared to 2016 as a result of an increase in demand resulting from changes in production levels primarily in the primary metals, chemicals, and mining sectors offset by the pipelines and paper sectors.
See "Operating Revenues" above for a discussion of significant changes in wholesale revenues from sales to non-affiliates and wholesale revenues from sales to affiliated companies related to changes in price and KWH sales.
Fuel and Purchased Power Expenses
The mix of fuel sources for generation of electricity is determined primarily by the unit cost of fuel consumed, demand, and the availability of generating units. Additionally, Alabama Power purchases a portion of its electricity needs from the wholesale market.

MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS (continued)
Alabama Power Company 2018 Annual Report

Details of Alabama Power's generation and purchased power were as follows:
 2018 2017 2016
Total generation (in billions of KWHs)
60.5
 60.3
 60.2
Total purchased power (in billions of KWHs)
8.1
 6.4
 7.1
Sources of generation (percent) —
     
Coal50
 50
 53
Nuclear23
 24
 23
Gas19
 20
 19
Hydro8
 6
 5
Cost of fuel, generated (in cents per net KWH) —
     
Coal2.73
 2.60
 2.75
Nuclear0.77
 0.75
 0.78
Gas2.84
 2.72
 2.67
Average cost of fuel, generated (in cents per net KWH)(a)(b)
2.26
 2.14
 2.26
Average cost of purchased power (in cents per net KWH)(c)
5.47
 5.29
 4.80
(a)For 2018, cost of fuel, generated and average cost of fuel, generated excludes a $30 million adjustment associated with a May 2018 Alabama PSC accounting order related to excess deferred income taxes. See FUTURE EARNINGS POTENTIAL – "Retail Regulatory Matters – Tax Reform Accounting Order" herein for additional information.
(b)KWHs generated by hydro are excluded from the average cost of fuel, generated.
(c)Average cost of purchased power includes fuel, energy, and transmission purchased by Alabama Power for tolling agreements where power is generated by the provider.
Fuel and purchased power expenses were $1.73 billion in 2018, an increase of $180 million, or 11.6%, compared to 2017. The increase was primarily due to an $81 million net increase related to the volume of KWHs purchased and generated, a $54 million increase in the average cost of fuel, and a $15 million increase in the average cost of purchased power.
In addition, fuel expense increased $30 million in 2018 as a result of an Alabama PSC accounting order authorizing the amortization of a regulatory liability to offset under recovered fuel costs. See FUTURE EARNINGS POTENTIAL – "Retail Regulatory Matters – Tax Reform Accounting Order" herein for additional information.
Fuel and purchased power expenses were $1.55 billion in 2017, a decrease of $78 million, or 4.8%, compared to 2016. The decrease was primarily due to a $67 million net decrease related to the volume of KWHs generated and purchased and a $42 million decrease in the average cost of fuel, partially offset by a $31 million increase in the average cost of purchased power.
Fuel and purchased power energy transactions do not have a significant impact on earnings, since energy expenses are generally offset by energy revenues through Alabama Power's energy cost recovery clause. Alabama Power, along with the Alabama PSC, continuously monitors the under/over recovered balance to determine whether adjustments to billing rates are required. See Note 2 to the financial statements under "Alabama Power – Rate ECR" for additional information.
Fuel
Fuel expenses were $1.3 billion in 2018, an increase of $76 million, or 6.2%, compared to 2017. The increase was primarily due to a 5.0% increase in the average cost of KWHs generated by coal and a 4.4% increase in the average cost of KWHs generated by natural gas, which excludes tolling agreements. These increases were partially offset by a 28.3% increase in the volume of KWHs generated by hydro and a 2.1% decrease in the volume of KWHs generated by natural gas. Fuel expenses were $1.2 billion in 2017, a decrease of $72 million, or 5.6%, compared to 2016. The decrease was primarily due to a 12.2% increase in the volume of KWHs generated by hydro, a 5.8% decrease in the volume of KWHs generated by coal, and a 5.5% and 3.9% decrease in the average cost of KWHs generated by coal and nuclear fuel, respectively. These decreases were partially offset by an 8.1% increase in the volume of KWHs generated by nuclear fuel and a 4.0% increase in the volume of KWHs generated by natural gas.
In addition, fuel expense increased $30 million in 2018 as a result of an Alabama PSC accounting order authorizing the amortization of a regulatory liability to offset under recovered fuel costs. See FUTURE EARNINGS POTENTIAL – "Retail Regulatory Matters – Tax Reform Accounting Order" herein for additional information.

MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS (continued)
Alabama Power Company 2018 Annual Report

Purchased Power Non-Affiliates
Purchased power expense from non-affiliates was $216 million in 2018, an increase of $46 million, or 27.1%, compared to 2017. This increase was primarily due to an 18.9% increase in the amount of energy purchased due to colder weather in the first quarter and warmer weather in the second and third quarters 2018 as compared to the corresponding periods in 2017 and a 6.6% increase in the average cost per KWH purchased due to higher natural gas prices. Purchased power expense from non-affiliates was $170 million in 2017, an increase of $4 million, or 2.4%, compared to 2016.
Energy purchases from non-affiliates will vary depending on the market prices of wholesale energy as compared to the cost of the Southern Company system's generation, demand for energy within the Southern Company system's service territory, and the availability of the Southern Company system's generation.
Purchased Power Affiliates
Purchased power expense from affiliates was $216 million in 2018, an increase of $58 million, or 36.7%, compared to 2017. This increase was primarily due to a 34.5% increase in the amount of energy purchased due to colder weather in the first quarter and warmer weather in the second and third quarters 2018 as compared to the corresponding periods in 2017 and a 1.4% increase in the average cost per KWH purchased due to higher natural gas prices. Purchased power expense from affiliates was $158 million in 2017, a decrease of $10 million, or 6.0%, compared to 2016. This decrease was primarily due to a 17.2% decrease in the amount of energy purchased due to milder weather partially offset by a 13.9% increase in the average cost per KWH purchased due to higher natural gas prices.
Energy purchases from affiliates will vary depending on demand for energy and the availability and cost of generating resources at each company within the Southern Company system. These purchases are made in accordance with the IIC or other contractual agreements, as approved by the FERC.
Other Operations and Maintenance Expenses
In 2018, other operations and maintenance expenses decreased $40 million, or 2.3%, as compared to the prior year. Generation costs decreased $34 million primarily due to fewer outages resulting in lower costs. Employee benefit costs, including pension costs, decreased $26 million primarily due to lower active medical costs. Customer service costs decreased $10 million primarily due to cost-saving initiatives. These decreases were partially offset by a $47 million increase in expenses from unregulated sales of products and services that were reclassified as other operations and maintenance expenses as a result of the adoption of ASC 606. In prior periods, these expenses were included in other income (expense), net. See Note 1 to the financial statements under "Revenue" for additional information.
In 2017, other operations and maintenance expenses increased $152 million, or 9.8%, as compared to the prior year. Distribution and transmission expenses increased $58 million primarily due to vegetation management expenses. Generation costs increased $38 million primarily due to outage costs. Employee benefit costs, including pension costs, increased $32 million.
See Note 11 to the financial statements under "Pension Plans" for additional information.
Depreciation and Amortization
Depreciation and amortization increased $28 million, or 3.8%, in 2018 as compared to the prior year primarily due to additional plant in service related to distribution, transmission, compliance-related steam, and other generation production projects. Depreciation and amortization increased $33 million, or 4.7%, in 2017 as compared to the prior year primarily due to additional plant in service and an increase in generation-related depreciation rates, effective January 1, 2017, associated with compliance-related steam projects and ARO recovery, partially offset by a decrease in distribution-related depreciation rates. See Note 5 to the financial statements under "Depreciation and Amortization" for additional information.
Allowance for Equity Funds Used During Construction
AFUDC equity increased $23 million, or 59.0%, in 2018 as compared to the prior year. The increase was primarily associated with steam and transmission construction projects. AFUDC equity increased $11 million, or 39.3%, in 2017 as compared to the prior year. The increase was primarily associated with steam, transmission, and nuclear construction projects. See Note 1 to financial statements under "Allowance for Funds Used During Construction" for additional information.
Interest Expense, Net of Amounts Capitalized
Interest expense, net of amounts capitalized increased $18 million, or 5.9%, in 2018 as compared to the prior year primarily due to an increase in debt outstanding and higher interest rates, partially offset by an increase in the amounts capitalized. Interest

MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS (continued)
Alabama Power Company 2018 Annual Report

expense, net of amounts capitalized increased $3 million, or 1.0%, in 2017 as compared to the prior year. See FUTURE EARNINGS POTENTIAL – "Financing Activities" herein for additional information.
Other Income (Expense), Net
Other income (expense), net decreased $23 million, or 53.5%, in 2018 as compared to the prior year primarily due to an increase in charitable donations and the reclassification of revenues and expenses associated with unregulated sales of products and services to other revenues and operations and maintenance expenses, respectively, as a result of the adoption of ASC 606. See Note 1 to the financial statements under "Revenue" for additional information. Other income (expense), net increased $17 million, or 65.4%, in 2017 as compared to the prior year primarily due to increases in unregulated lighting services and a decrease in the non-service cost components of net periodic pension and other postretirement benefits costs. See Note 1 to the financial statements under "Recently Adopted Accounting Standards" and Note 11 to the financial statements for additional information on net periodic pension and other postretirement benefit costs.
Income Taxes
Income taxes decreased $277 million, or 48.8%, in 2018 as compared to the prior year primarily due to the reduction in the federal income tax rate, the benefit from the flowback of excess deferred income taxes as a result of the Tax Reform Legislation, and lower pre-tax earnings. Income taxes increased $37 million, or 7.0%, in 2017 as compared to the prior year primarily due to higher pre-tax earnings, an increase related to prior year tax return actualization, and an increase in income tax reserves, partially offset by an increase in state income tax credits. The impact to net income as a result of the Tax Reform Legislation was not material due to the application of regulatory accounting. See FUTURE EARNINGS POTENTIAL – "Income Tax Matters – Federal Tax Reform Legislation" herein and Note 10 to the financial statements for additional information.
Effects of Inflation
Alabama Power is subject to rate regulation that is generally based on the recovery of historical and projected costs. The effects of inflation can create an economic loss since the recovery of costs could be in dollars that have less purchasing power. Any adverse effect of inflation on Alabama Power's results of operations has not been substantial in recent years. See Note 2 to the financial statements under "Alabama Power – Rate RSE" for additional information.
FUTURE EARNINGS POTENTIAL
General
Alabama Power operates as a vertically integrated utility providing electric service to retail and wholesale customers within its traditional service territory located in the State of Alabama and to wholesale customers in the Southeast. Prices for electric service provided by Alabama Power to retail customers are set by the Alabama PSC under cost-based regulatory principles. Retail rates and earnings are reviewed and may be adjusted periodically within certain limitations. Prices for wholesale electric service, interconnecting transmission lines, and the exchange of electric power are regulated by the FERC. See ACCOUNTING POLICIES – "Application of Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates – Utility Regulation" herein and Note 2 to the financial statements under "Alabama Power" for additional information about regulatory matters.
The results of operations for the past three years are not necessarily indicative of future earnings potential. The level of Alabama Power's future earnings depends on numerous factors that affect the opportunities, challenges, and risks of Alabama Power's primary business of providing electric service. These factors include Alabama Power's ability to maintain a constructive regulatory environment that continues to allow for the timely recovery of prudently-incurred costs during a time of increasing costs and the weak pace of growth in new customers and electricity use per customer, especially in residential and commercial markets. Earnings will also depend upon maintaining and growing sales, considering, among other things, the adoption and/or penetration rates of increasingly energy-efficient technologies and increasing volumes of electronic commerce transactions, both of which $1.6could contribute to a net reduction in customer usage. Earnings are subject to a variety of other factors. These factors include weather, competition, new energy contracts with other utilities, energy conservation practiced by customers, the use of alternative energy sources by customers, the price of electricity, the price elasticity of demand, and the rate of economic growth or decline in Alabama Power's service territory. Demand for electricity is primarily driven by the pace of economic growth that may be affected by changes in regional and global economic conditions, which may impact future earnings.

MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS (continued)
Alabama Power Company 2018 Annual Report

Environmental Matters
Alabama Power's operations are regulated by state and federal environmental agencies through a variety of laws and regulations governing air, water, land, and protection of other natural resources. Alabama Power maintains comprehensive environmental compliance and GHG strategies to assess upcoming requirements and compliance costs associated with these environmental laws and regulations. The costs, including capital expenditures, operations and maintenance costs, and costs reflected in ARO liabilities, required to comply with environmental laws and regulations and to achieve stated goals may impact future electric generating unit retirement and replacement decisions, results of operations, cash flows, and/or financial condition. Related costs may result from the installation of additional environmental controls, closure and monitoring of CCR facilities, unit retirements, or changing fuel sources for certain existing units, as well as related upgrades to Alabama Power's transmission and distribution systems. A major portion of these costs is expected to be recovered through existing ratemaking provisions. The ultimate impact of environmental laws and regulations and the GHG goals discussed herein will depend on various factors, such as state adoption and implementation of requirements, the availability and cost of any deployed technology, fuel prices, and the outcome of pending and/or future legal challenges.
New or revised environmental laws and regulations could affect many areas of Alabama Power's operations. The impact of any such changes cannot be determined at this time. Environmental compliance costs could affect earnings if such costs cannot continue to be recovered in rates on a timely basis. Environmental compliance costs are recovered through Rate CNP Compliance. See Note 2 to the financial statements under "Alabama Power – Rate CNP Compliance" for additional information. Further, increased costs that are recovered through regulated rates could contribute to reduced demand for electricity, which could negatively affect results of operations, cash flows, and/or financial condition. Additionally, many commercial and industrial customers may also be affected by existing and future environmental requirements, which for some may have the potential to ultimately affect their demand for electricity.
Through 2018, Alabama Power has invested approximately $5.4 billion hadin environmental capital retrofit projects to comply with environmental requirements, with annual totals of approximately $681 million, $491 million, and $260 million for 2018, 2017, and 2016, respectively. Although the timing, requirements, and estimated costs could change as environmental laws and regulations are adopted or modified, as compliance plans are revised or updated, and as legal challenges to rules are initiated or completed, Alabama Power's current compliance strategy estimates capital expenditures of $635 million from 2019 through 2023, with annual totals of approximately $226 million in 2019, $68 million in 2020, $118 million in 2021, $112 million in 2022, and $111 million in 2023. These estimates do not include any potential compliance costs associated with pending regulation of CO2 emissions from fossil fuel-fired electric generating units. See "Global Climate Issues" herein for additional information. Alabama Power also anticipates substantial expenditures associated with ash pond closure and ground water monitoring under the CCR Rule, which are reflected in Alabama Power's ARO liabilities. See FINANCIAL CONDITION AND LIQUIDITY – "Capital Requirements and Contractual Obligations" herein and Note 6 to the financial statements for additional information.
Environmental Laws and Regulations
Air Quality
The EPA has set National Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS) for six air pollutants (carbon monoxide, lead, nitrogen dioxide, ozone, particulate matter, and SO2) to protect and improve the nation's air quality, which it reviews and revises periodically. Following a NAAQS revision, states are required to develop an EPA-approved plan to protect air quality. These state plans can require additional emission controls, improvements in control efficiency, or fuel changes which can result in increased compliance and operational costs. NAAQS requirements can also adversely affect the siting of new electric generating facilities. No areas within Alabama Power's service territory are currently designated nonattainment for any NAAQS. If areas are designated as nonattainment in the future, increased compliance costs could result.
In 2011, the EPA finalized the Cross-State Air Pollution Rule (CSAPR) to address impacts of SO2 and NOX emissions from fossil fuel-fired electric generating plants. CSAPR establishes emissions trading programs and budgets for certain states and allocates emissions allowances for sources in those states. In 2016, the EPA published a final rule establishing more stringent ozone season NOX emissions budgets in Alabama. Increases in either future fossil fuel-fired generation or the availability or cost of CSAPR allowances could have a negative financial impact on results of operations for Alabama Power.
The EPA finalized regional haze regulations in 2005 and 2017. These regulations require states, tribal governments, and various federal agencies to develop and implement plans to reduce pollutants that impair visibility and demonstrate reasonable progress toward the goal of restoring natural visibility conditions in certain areas, including national parks and wilderness areas. States must submit a revised state implementation plan (SIP) to the EPA demonstrating continued reasonable progress towards achieving visibility improvement goals. The EPA approved the regional progress SIP for the State of Alabama.

MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS (continued)
Alabama Power Company 2018 Annual Report

Water Quality
In 2014, the EPA finalized requirements under Section 316(b) of the Clean Water Act (CWA) to regulate cooling water intake structures (CWIS) to minimize their effects on fish and other aquatic life at existing power plants (e.g. coal, natural gas, oil, and nuclear generating plants) and manufacturing facilities. The regulation requires plant-specific studies to determine applicable CWIS changes to protect organisms that either get caught on the intake screens (impingement) or are drawn into the cooling system (entrainment). Alabama Power is conducting these studies and currently anticipates applicable CWIS changes may include fish-friendly CWIS screens with fish return systems and minor additions of monitoring equipment at certain plants. However, the ultimate impact of this rule will depend on the outcome of these plant-specific studies, any additional protective measures required to be incorporated into each plant's National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit based on site-specific factors, and the outcome of any legal challenges.
In 2015, the EPA finalized the steam electric effluent limitations guidelines (ELG) rule (2015 ELG Rule) that set national standards for wastewater discharges from new and existing steam electric generating units generating greater than 50 MWs. The 2015 ELG Rule prohibits effluent discharges of certain waste streams and imposes stringent limits on flue gas desulfurization (scrubber) wastewater discharges. The revised technology-based limits and the CCR Rule require extensive changes to existing ash and wastewater management systems or the installation and operation of new ash and wastewater management systems. Compliance with the 2015 ELG Rule is expected to require capital expenditures and increased operational costs primarily for Alabama Power's coal-fired electric generation. State environmental agencies will incorporate specific compliance applicability dates in the NPDES permitting process for each ELG waste stream no later than December 31, 2023. The EPA is scheduled to issue a new rulemaking by December 2019 that could revise the limitations and applicability dates of two of the waste streams regulated in the 2015 ELG Rule. The impact of any changes to the 2015 ELG Rule will depend on the content of the new rule and the outcome of any legal challenges. Alabama Power does not anticipate that the unavailability of any units as a result of the ELG rule will have a material impact on Alabama Power's operations or financial condition.
In 2015, the EPA and the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (Corps) jointly published a final rule that revised the regulatory definition of waters of the United States (WOTUS) for all CWA programs. The rule significantly expanded the scope of federal jurisdiction over waterbodies (such as rivers, streams, canals, and wastewater treatment ponds), which could impact new generation projects and permitting and reporting requirements associated with the installation, expansion, and maintenance of transmission and distribution projects. The EPA and the Corps are expected to publish a final rule in 2019 to replace the 2015 WOTUS definition. The impact of any changes to the 2015 WOTUS rule will depend on the content of this final rule and the outcome of any legal challenges.
Coal Combustion Residuals
In 2015, the EPA finalized non-hazardous solid waste regulations for the disposal of CCR, including coal ash and gypsum, in landfills and surface impoundments (ash ponds) at active generating power plants. In addition to the EPA's CCR Rule, the State of Alabama has also finalized regulations regarding the handling of CCR that have been incurredprovided to the EPA for review. This state CCR rule is generally consistent with the federal CCR Rule. The EPA's CCR Rule requires landfills and ash ponds to be evaluated against a set of performance criteria and potentially closed if minimum criteria are not met. Closure of existing landfills and ash ponds could require installation of equipment and infrastructure to manage CCR in accordance with the CCR Rule. Based on cost estimates for closure in place and monitoring of ash ponds pursuant to the CCR Rule, Alabama Power recorded AROs for each CCR unit in 2015. As further analysis was performed and closure details were developed, Alabama Power has continued to periodically update these cost estimates, as discussed further below.
The EPA published certain amendments to the CCR Rule, which became effective August 29, 2018. These amendments extend the date from April 2019 to October 31, 2020 to cease sending CCR and other waste streams to ash ponds that demonstrate compliance with all except two of the specified performance criteria.
On August 21, 2018, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit issued a decision suggesting the EPA should regulate previously-excluded inactive ash ponds located at retired generation facilities and questioning both the ability of unlined ash ponds to continue operating no matter the performance criteria results and the classification of clay-lined landfills and ash ponds. These developments could impact the expected timing of Alabama Power's landfill and ash pond closure activities, but the extent of any impact will depend on the outcome of ongoing litigation, anticipated EPA rulemaking action to establish further guidance, and the outcome of any legal challenges.
In June 2018, Alabama Power recorded an increase of approximately $1.2 billion to its AROs related to the CCR Rule. The revised cost estimates were based on information from feasibility studies performed on ash ponds in use at plants operated by Alabama Power. During the second quarter 2018, Alabama Power's management completed its analysis of these studies which indicated that additional closure costs, primarily related to increases in estimated ash volume, water management requirements,

MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS (continued)
Alabama Power Company 2018 Annual Report

and design revisions, will be required to close these ash ponds under the planned closure-in-place methodology. As the level of work becomes more defined in the next 12 months, it is likely that these cost estimates will change and the change could be material.
Alabama Power expects to periodically update its ARO cost estimates. Absent continued recovery of ARO costs through regulated rates, Alabama Power's results of operations, cash flows, and financial condition could be materially impacted. See FINANCIAL CONDITION AND LIQUIDITY – "Capital Requirements and Contractual Obligations" herein and Note 6 to the financial statements for additional information.
The ultimate outcome of these matters cannot be determined at this time.
Nuclear Decommissioning
In June 2018, Alabama Power completed an updated decommissioning cost site study for Plant Farley. The estimated cost of decommissioning based on the study resulted in an increase in Alabama Power's ARO liability of approximately $300 million. Amounts previously contributed to Alabama Power's external trust funds are currently projected to be adequate to meet the updated decommissioning obligations. See Note 6 to the financial statements for additional information.
Global Climate Issues
On August 31, 2018, the EPA published a proposed rule known as the Affordable Clean Energy (ACE) Rule, which is intended to replace a regulation enacted in 2015 known as the Clean Power Plan (CPP), that would limit CO2 emissions from existing fossil fuel-fired electric generating units. The CPP has been stayed by the U.S. Supreme Court since 2016. The ACE Rule would require states to develop GHG unit-specific emission rate standards based on heat-rate efficiency improvements for existing fossil fuel-fired steam units. As proposed, combustion turbines, including natural gas combined cycles, are not affected sources. As of January 1, 2019, Alabama Power has ownership interests in 20 fossil fuel-fired steam units to which the proposed ACE Rule is applicable. The ultimate impact of this rule to Alabama Power is currently unknown and will depend on changes between the proposal and the final rule, subsequent state plan developments and requirements, and any associated legal challenges.
On December 20, 2018, the EPA published a proposed review of the Standards of Performance for Greenhouse Gas Emissions from New, Modified, and Reconstructed Stationary Sources: Electric Utility Generating Units final rule (2015 NSPS rule). The EPA's final 2015 NSPS rule set standards of performance for new, modified, and reconstructed electric utility generating units which included stationary combustion turbines and fossil-fired steam boilers. This proposal reduces the stringency of the 2015 NSPS rule by not basing the new and reconstructed fossil-fired steam boiler and IGCC standards on partial carbon capture and sequestration. The impact of any changes to this rule will depend on the content of the final rule and the outcome of any legal challenges.
The EPA's GHG reporting rule requires annual reporting of GHG emissions expressed in terms of metric tons of CO2 equivalent emissions for a company's operational control of facilities. Based on ownership or financial control of facilities, Alabama Power's 2017 GHG emissions were approximately 37 million metric tons of CO2 equivalent. The preliminary estimate of Alabama Power's 2018 GHG emissions on the same basis is approximately 36 million metric tons of CO2 equivalent.
Through 2017, the Southern Company system has achieved an estimated GHG emission reduction of 36% since 2007. In April 2018, Southern Company established an intermediate goal of a 50% reduction in carbon emissions from 2007 levels by 2030 and a long-term goal of low- to no-carbon operations by 2050. To achieve these goals, the Southern Company system expects to continue growing its renewable energy portfolio, optimize technology advancements to modernize its transmission and distribution systems, increase the use of natural gas for generation, complete ongoing construction projects, invest in energy efficiency, and continue research and development efforts focused on technologies to lower GHG emissions. The Southern Company system's ability to achieve these goals also will be dependent on many external factors, including supportive national energy policies, low natural gas prices, and the development, deployment, and advancement of relevant energy technologies.
FERC Matters
Open Access Transmission Tariff
On May 10, 2018, AMEA and Cooperative Energy filed with the FERC a complaint against SCS and the traditional electric operating companies (including Alabama Power) claiming that the current 11.25% base ROE used in calculating the annual transmission revenue requirements of the traditional electric operating companies' (including Alabama Power's) open access transmission tariff is unjust and unreasonable as measured by the applicable FERC standards. The complaint requested that the base ROE be set no higher than 8.65% and that the FERC order refunds for the difference in revenue requirements that results from applying a just and reasonable ROE established in this proceeding upon determining the current ROE is unjust and

MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS (continued)
Alabama Power Company 2018 Annual Report

unreasonable. On June 18, 2018, SCS and the traditional electric operating companies (including Alabama Power) filed their response challenging the adequacy of the showing presented by the complainants and offering support for the current ROE. On September 6, 2018, the FERC issued an order establishing a refund effective date of May 10, 2018 in the event a refund is due and initiating an investigation and settlement procedures regarding the current base ROE. Through December 31, 2018, the estimated maximum potential refund is not expected to be material to Alabama Power's results of operations or cash flows. The ultimate outcome of this matter cannot be determined at this time.
Retail Regulatory Matters
Alabama Power's revenues from regulated retail operations are collected through various rate mechanisms subject to the oversight of the Alabama PSC. Alabama Power currently recovers its costs from the regulated retail business primarily through Rate RSE, Rate CNP, Rate ECR, and Rate NDR. In addition, the Alabama PSC issues accounting orders to address current events impacting Alabama Power. See Note 2 to the financial statements under "Alabama Power" for additional information regarding Alabama Power's rate mechanisms and accounting orders.
Rate RSE
The Alabama PSC has adopted Rate RSE that provides for periodic annual adjustments based upon Alabama Power's projected weighted common equity return (WCER) compared to an allowable range. Rate RSE adjustments are based on forward-looking information for the applicable upcoming calendar year. Rate RSE adjustments for any two-year period, when averaged together, cannot exceed 4.0% and any annual adjustment is limited to 5.0%. When the projected WCER is under the allowed range, there is an adjusting point of 5.98% and eligibility for a performance-based adder of seven basis points, or 0.07%, to the WCER adjusting point if Alabama Power (i) has an "A" credit rating equivalent with at least one of the recognized rating agencies or (ii) is in the top one-third of a designated customer value benchmark survey. If Alabama Power's actual retail return is above the allowed WCER range, the excess will be refunded to customers unless otherwise directed by the Alabama PSC; however, there is no provision for additional customer billings should the actual retail return fall below the WCER range. Prior to January 2019, retail rates remained unchanged when the WCER range was between 5.75% and 6.21%.
On May 1, 2018, the Alabama PSC approved modifications to Rate RSE and other commitments designed to position Alabama Power to address the growing pressure on its credit quality resulting from the Tax Reform Legislation, without increasing retail rates under Rate RSE in the near term. Alabama Power plans to reduce growth in total debt by increasing equity, with corresponding reductions in debt issuances, thereby de-leveraging its capital structure. Alabama Power's goal is to achieve an equity ratio of approximately 55% by the end of 2025. At December 31, 2018, Alabama Power's equity ratio was approximately 47%.
The approved modifications to Rate RSE began for billings in January 2019. The modifications include reducing the top of the allowed WCER range from 6.21% to 6.15% and modifications to the refund mechanism applicable to prior year actual results. The modifications to the refund mechanism allow Alabama Power to retain a portion of the revenue that causes the actual WCER for a given year to exceed the allowed range.
Generally, if Alabama Power's actual WCER is between 6.15% and 7.65%, customers will receive 25% of the amount between 6.15% and 6.65%, 40% of the amount between 6.65% and 7.15%, and 75% of the amount between 7.15% and 7.65%. Customers will receive all amounts in excess of an actual WCER of 7.65%.
In conjunction with these modifications to Rate RSE, on May 8, 2018, Alabama Power consented to a moratorium on any upward adjustments under Rate RSE for 2019 and 2020 and will also return $50 million to customers through bill credits in 2019.
On November 30, 2018, Alabama Power made its required annual Rate RSE submission to the Alabama PSC of projected data for calendar year 2019. Projected earnings were within the specified range; therefore, retail rates under Rate RSE remain unchanged for 2019.
At December 31, 2018, Alabama Power's retail return exceeded the allowed WCER range, which resulted in Alabama Power establishing a regulatory liability of $109 million for Rate RSE refunds. In accordance with an Alabama PSC order issued on February 5, 2019, Alabama Power will apply $75 million to reduce the Rate ECR under recovered balance and the remaining $34 million will be refunded to customers through bill credits in July through September 2019.
Rate CNP PPA
Alabama Power's retail rates, approved by the Alabama PSC, provide for adjustments under Rate CNP to recognize the placing of new generating facilities into retail service. Alabama Power may also recover retail costs associated with certificated PPAs under

MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS (continued)
Alabama Power Company 2018 Annual Report

Rate CNP PPA. No adjustments to Rate CNP PPA occurred during the period 2016 through 2018 and no adjustment is expected in 2019.
In accordance with an accounting order issued in February 2017 by the Alabama PSC, Alabama Power reclassified $69 million of the December 31, 2016 Rate CNP PPA under recovered balance to a separate regulatory asset. The amortization of the new regulatory asset through Rate RSE will begin concurrently with the effective date of Alabama Power's next depreciation study, which is expected to occur no later than 2022.
Rate CNP Compliance
Rate CNP Compliance allows for the recovery of Alabama Power's retail costs associated with laws, regulations, and other such mandates directed at the utility industry involving the environment, security, reliability, safety, sustainability, or similar considerations impacting Alabama Power's facilities or operations. Rate CNP Compliance is based on forward-looking information and provides for the recovery of these costs pursuant to a factor that is calculated annually. Compliance costs to be recovered include operations and maintenance expenses, depreciation, and a return on certain invested capital. Revenues for Rate CNP Compliance, as recorded on the financial statements, are adjusted for differences in actual recoverable costs and amounts billed in current regulated rates. Accordingly, changes in the billing factor will have no significant effect on Alabama Power's revenues or net income, but will affect annual cash flow. Changes in Rate CNP Compliance-related operations and maintenance expenses and depreciation generally will have no effect on net income.
In accordance with an accounting order issued in February 2017 by the Alabama PSC, Alabama Power reclassified $36 million of its under recovered balance in Rate CNP Compliance to a separate regulatory asset. The amortization of the new regulatory asset through Rate RSE will begin concurrently with the effective date of Alabama Power's next depreciation study, which is expected to occur no later than 2022.
On November 30, 2018, Alabama Power submitted calculations associated with its cost of complying with environmental mandates, as provided under Rate CNP Compliance. The filing reflected a projected unrecovered retail revenue requirement for environmental compliance of approximately $205 million, which is being recovered in the billing months of January 2019 through December 2019.
Rate ECR
Alabama Power has established energy cost recovery rates under Alabama Power's Rate ECR as approved by the Alabama PSC. Rates are based on an estimate of future energy costs and the current over or under recovered balance. Revenues recognized under Rate ECR and recorded on the financial statements are adjusted for the difference in actual recoverable fuel costs and amounts billed in current regulated rates. The difference in the recoverable fuel costs and amounts billed give rise to the over or under recovered amounts recorded as regulatory assets or liabilities. Alabama Power, along with the Alabama PSC, continually monitors the over or under recovered cost balance to determine whether an adjustment to billing rates is required. Changes in the Rate ECR factor have no significant effect on Alabama Power's net income, but will impact operating cash flows. Currently, the Alabama PSC may approve billing rates under Rate ECR of up to 5.910 cents per KWH.
In accordance with an accounting order issued in February 2017 by the Alabama PSC, Alabama Power reclassified $36 million of its under recovered balance in Rate ECR to a separate regulatory asset. The amortization of the new regulatory asset through Rate RSE will begin concurrently with the effective date of Alabama Power's next depreciation study, which is expected to occur no later than 2022. Alabama Power's current depreciation study became effective January 1, 2017.
On May 1, 2018, the Alabama PSC approved an increase to Rate ECR from 2.015 cents per KWH to 2.353 cents per KWH effective July 2018 through December 2018. On December 4, 2018, the Alabama PSC issued a consent order to leave this rate in effect through December 31, 2019. This change is expected to increase collections by approximately $183 million in 2019. Absent any further order from the Alabama PSC, in January 2020, the rates will return to the originally authorized 5.910 cents per KWH.
As discussed herein under "Rate RSE," in accordance with an Alabama PSC order issued on February 5, 2019, Alabama Power will utilize $75 million of the 2018 Rate RSE refund liability to reduce the Rate ECR under recovered balance.
Tax Reform Accounting Order
On May 1, 2018, the Alabama PSC approved an accounting order that authorized Alabama Power to defer the benefits of federal excess deferred income taxes associated with the Tax Reform Legislation for the year ended December 31, 2018 as a regulatory liability and to use up to $30 million of such deferrals to offset under recovered amounts under Rate ECR. The estimated deferrals for the year ended December 31, 2018 totaled approximately $63 million, subject to adjustment following the filing of the 2018 tax return, of which $30 million was used to offset the Rate ECR under recovered balance and $33 million is recorded in other

MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS (continued)
Alabama Power Company 2018 Annual Report

regulatory liabilities, deferred on the balance sheet to be used for the benefit of customers as determined by the Alabama PSC at a future date. See Note 10 to the financial statements under "Current and Deferred Income Taxes" for additional information.
Software Accounting Order
On February 5, 2019, the Alabama PSC approved an accounting order that authorizes Alabama Power to establish a regulatory asset for operations and maintenance costs associated with software implementation projects. The regulatory asset will be amortized ratably over the life of the related software.
Plant Greene County
Alabama Power jointly owns Plant Greene County with an affiliate, Mississippi Power. See Note 5 to the financial statements under "Joint Ownership Agreements" for additional information regarding the joint ownership agreement. On August 6, 2018, Mississippi Power filed its proposed Reserve Margin Plan (RMP) with the Mississippi PSC, which proposes a four-year acceleration of the retirement of Plant Greene County Units 1 and 2 to the third quarter 2021 and the third quarter 2022, respectively. Mississippi Power's proposed Plant Greene County unit retirements would require the completion of proposed transmission and system reliability improvements, as well as agreement by Alabama Power. Alabama Power will continue to monitor the status of Mississippi Power's proposed RMP and associated regulatory process as well as the proposed transmission and system reliability improvements. Alabama Power will review all the facts and circumstances and will evaluate all its alternatives prior to reaching a final determination on the ongoing operations of Plant Greene County. The ultimate outcome of this matter cannot be determined at this time.
Request for Proposals for Future Generation
On September 21, 2018, Alabama Power issued a request for proposals of between 100 MWs and 1,200 MWs of capacity beginning no later than 2023. On November 9, 2018, bids were received and an evaluation of those bids is in progress. Any purchases will depend upon the cost competitiveness of the respective offers as well as other options available to Alabama Power. The ultimate outcome of this matter cannot be determined at this time.
Rate NDR
Based on an order from the Alabama PSC, Alabama Power maintains a reserve for operations and maintenance expenses to cover the cost of damages from major storms to its transmission and distribution facilities. The order approves a separate monthly Rate NDR charge to customers consisting of two components. The first component is intended to establish and maintain a reserve balance for future storms and is an on-going part of customer billing. When the reserve balance falls below $50 million, a reserve establishment charge will be activated (and the on-going reserve maintenance charge concurrently suspended) until the reserve balance reaches $75 million. In December 2017, the reserve maintenance charge was suspended and the reserve establishment charge was activated as a result of the NDR balance falling below $50 million. Alabama Power expects to collect approximately $16 million annually until the reserve balance is restored to $75 million. The NDR balance at December 31, 2018 was $20 million and is included in other regulatory liabilities, deferred on the balance sheet.
The second component of the Rate NDR charge is intended to allow recovery of any existing deferred storm-related operations and maintenance costs and any future reserve deficits over a 24-month period. The Alabama PSC order gives Alabama Power authority to record a deficit balance in the NDR when costs of storm damage exceed any established reserve balance. Absent further Alabama PSC approval, the maximum total Rate NDR charge consisting of both components is $10 per month per non-residential customer account and $5 per month per residential customer account. Alabama Power has the authority, based on an order from the Alabama PSC, to accrue certain additional amounts as circumstances warrant.
As revenue from the Rate NDR charge is recognized, an equal amount of operations and maintenance expenses related to the NDR will also be recognized. As a result, the Rate NDR charge will not have an effect on net income but will impact operating cash flows.
Environmental Accounting Order
Based on an order from the Alabama PSC (Environmental Accounting Order), Alabama Power is allowed to establish a regulatory asset to record the unrecovered investment costs, including the unrecovered plant asset balance and the unrecovered costs associated with site removal and closure associated with future unit retirements caused by environmental regulations. The regulatory asset is being amortized and recovered over the affected unit's remaining useful life, as established prior to the decision regarding early retirement through Rate CNP Compliance. At December 31, 2018, this regulatory asset had a balance of $42 million. See "Environmental Matters – Environmental Laws and Regulations" herein for additional information regarding environmental regulations.

MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS (continued)
Alabama Power Company 2018 Annual Report

Subsequent to December 31, 2018, Alabama Power determined that Plant Gorgas Units 8, 9, and 10 (approximately 1,000 MWs) will be retired by April 15, 2019 due to the expected costs of compliance with federal and state environmental regulations. In accordance with the Environmental Accounting Order, approximately $740 million of net investment costs will be transferred to a regulatory asset at the retirement date and recovered over the affected units' remaining useful lives, as established prior to the decision to retire.
Income Tax Matters
Federal Tax Reform Legislation
In December 2017, the Tax Reform Legislation was signed into law and became effective on January 1, 2018. The Tax Reform Legislation, among other things, reduced the federal corporate income tax rate to 21%, retained normalization provisions for public utility property and existing renewable energy incentives, and repealed the corporate alternative minimum tax. In addition, under the Tax Reform Legislation, net operating losses (NOLs) generated after December 31, 2017 can no longer be carried back to previous tax years but can be carried forward indefinitely, with utilization limited to 80% of taxable income of the subsequent tax year. The projected reduction of Southern Company's consolidated income tax liability resulting from the tax rate reduction also delays the expected utilization of existing tax credit carryforwards. See Note 10 to the financial statements for information on Southern Company's joint consolidated income tax allocation agreement.
Following the enactment of the Tax Reform Legislation, the SEC staff issued Staff Accounting Bulletin 118 – "Income Tax Accounting Implications of the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act" (SAB 118), which provided for a measurement period of up to one year from the enactment date to complete accounting under GAAP for the tax effects of the legislation. Due to the complex and comprehensive nature of the enacted tax law changes and their application under GAAP, Alabama Power considered all amounts recorded in the financial statements as a result of the Tax Reform Legislation "provisional" as discussed in SAB 118 and subject to revision prior to filing its 2017 tax return in the fourth quarter 2018. Alabama Power recognized tax expense of $3 million in 2017 as a result of the Tax Reform Legislation. In addition, in total, Alabama Power recorded a $281 million decrease in regulatory assets and a $2.0 billion increase in regulatory liabilities as a result of the Tax Reform Legislation. As of December 31, 2018, Alabama Power considered the measurement of impacts from the Tax Reform Legislation on deferred income tax assets and liabilities, primarily due to the impact of the reduction of the corporate income tax rate, to be complete.
However, the IRS continues to issue regulations that provide further interpretation and guidance on the law and each state's adoption of the provisions contained in the Tax Reform Legislation remains uncertain. The regulatory treatment of certain impacts of the Tax Reform Legislation is subject to the discretion of the FERC. The ultimate impact of this matter cannot be determined at this time. See Note 2 to the financial statements under "Alabama Power – Rate RSE" for additional information regarding modifications to Rate RSE to reflect the impacts of the Tax Reform Legislation. Also see FINANCIAL CONDITION AND LIQUIDITY – "Credit Rating Risk" herein and Note 10 to the financial statements under "Current and Deferred Income Taxes" for additional information.
Bonus Depreciation
Under the Tax Reform Legislation, projects with binding contracts prior to September 28, 2017 and placed in service after September 27, 2017 remain eligible for bonus depreciation under the PATH Act. The PATH Act allowed for 50% bonus depreciation for 2015 through 2017, 40% bonus depreciation for 2018, and 30% bonus depreciation for 2019 and certain long-lived assets placed in service in 2020. Based on provisional estimates, bonus depreciation is expected to result in positive cash flows of approximately $100 million for the 2018 tax year and approximately $30 million for the 2019 tax year. See Note 10 to the financial statements under "Current and Deferred Income Taxes" for additional information. The ultimate outcome of this matter cannot be determined at this time.
Other Matters
Alabama Power is involved in various other matters being litigated and regulatory matters that could affect future earnings. In addition, Alabama Power is subject to certain claims and legal actions arising in the ordinary course of business. Alabama Power's business activities are subject to extensive governmental regulation related to public health and the environment, such as laws and regulations governing air, water, land, and protection of other natural resources. Litigation over environmental issues and claims of various types, including property damage, personal injury, common law nuisance, and citizen enforcement of environmental laws and regulations, has occurred throughout the U.S. This litigation has included claims for damages alleged to have been caused by CO2 and other emissions, CCR, and alleged exposure to hazardous materials, and/or requests for injunctive relief in connection with such matters.

MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS (continued)
Alabama Power Company 2018 Annual Report

The ultimate outcome of such pending or potential litigation or regulatory matters cannot be predicted at this time; however, for current proceedings not specifically reported herein or in Notes 2 and 3 to the financial statements, management does not anticipate that the ultimate liabilities, if any, arising from such current proceedings would have a material effect on Alabama Power's financial statements. See Notes 2 and 3 to the financial statements for a discussion of various other contingencies, regulatory matters, and other matters being litigated which may affect future earnings potential.
ACCOUNTING POLICIES
Application of Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates
Alabama Power prepares its financial statements in accordance with GAAP. Significant accounting policies are described in Notes 1, 5, and 6 to the financial statements. In the application of these policies, certain estimates are made that may have a material impact on Alabama Power's results of operations and related disclosures. Different assumptions and measurements could produce estimates that are significantly different from those recorded in the financial statements. Senior management has reviewed and discussed the following critical accounting policies and estimates with the Audit Committee of Southern Company's Board of Directors.
Utility Regulation
Alabama Power is subject to retail regulation by the Alabama PSC and wholesale regulation by the FERC. As a result, Alabama Power applies accounting standards which require the financial statements to reflect the effects of rate regulation. Through the ratemaking process, the regulators may require the inclusion of costs or revenues in periods different than when they would be recognized by a non-regulated company. This treatment may result in the deferral of expenses and the recording of related regulatory assets based on anticipated future recovery through rates or the deferral of gains or creation of liabilities and the recording of related regulatory liabilities. The application of the accounting standards has a further effect on Alabama Power's financial statements as a result of the estimates of allowable costs used in the ratemaking process. These estimates may differ from those actually incurred by Alabama Power; therefore, the accounting estimates inherent in specific costs such as depreciation, AROs, and pension and other postretirement benefits have less of a direct impact on Alabama Power's results of operations and financial condition than they would on a non-regulated company.
As reflected in Note 2 to the financial statements under "Alabama PowerRegulatory Assets and Liabilities," significant regulatory assets and liabilities have been recorded. Management reviews the ultimate recoverability of these regulatory assets and any requirement to refund these regulatory liabilities based on applicable regulatory guidelines and GAAP. However, adverse legislative, judicial, or regulatory actions could materially impact the amounts of such regulatory assets and liabilities and could adversely impact Alabama Power's financial statements.
Asset Retirement Obligations
AROs are computed as the fair value of the estimated costs for an asset's future retirement and are recorded in the period in which the liability is incurred. The estimated costs are capitalized as part of the related long-lived asset and depreciated over the asset's useful life. In the absence of quoted market prices, AROs are estimated using present value techniques in which estimates of future cash outlays associated with the asset retirements are discounted using a credit-adjusted risk-free rate. Estimates of the timing and amounts of future cash outlays are based on projections of when and how the assets will be retired and the cost of future removal activities.
The liability for AROs primarily relates to the decommissioning of Alabama Power's nuclear facility, Plant Farley, and facilities that are subject to the CCR Rule and the related state rule, principally ash ponds. In addition, Alabama Power has AROs related to various landfill sites, underground storage tanks, asbestos removal related to ongoing repair and maintenance, disposal of polychlorinated biphenyls in certain transformers, and disposal of sulfur hexafluoride gas in certain substation breakers.
Alabama Power also has identified retirement obligations related to certain transmission and distribution facilities, asbestos containing material within long-term assets not subject to ongoing repair and maintenance activities, and certain wireless communication towers. However, liabilities for the removal of these assets have not been recorded because the settlement timing for the retirement obligations related to these assets is indeterminable and, therefore, the fair value of the retirement obligations cannot be reasonably estimated. A liability for these retirement obligations will be recognized when sufficient information becomes available to support a reasonable estimation of the retirement obligation.
The cost estimates for AROs related to the disposal of CCR are based on information using various assumptions related to closure and post-closure costs, timing of future cash outlays, inflation and discount rates, and the potential methods for complying with the CCR Rule requirements for closure in place. In June 2018, Alabama Power recorded increases of approximately $1.2 billion

MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS (continued)
Alabama Power Company 2018 Annual Report

to its AROs related to the CCR Rule and approximately $300 million to its AROs related to updated nuclear decommissioning cost site studies. The revised CCR-related cost estimates as of June 30, 2018 were based on information from feasibility studies performed on ash ponds in use at the plants Alabama Power operates. During the second quarter 2018, Alabama Power's management completed its analysis of these studies which indicated that additional closure costs, primarily related to increases in estimated ash volume, water management requirements, and design revisions, will be required to close these ash ponds under the planned closure-in-place methodology. As the level of work becomes more defined in the next 12 months, it is likely that these cost estimates will change and the change could be material. Alabama Power expects to periodically update its ARO cost estimates. See FUTURE EARNINGS POTENTIAL – "Environmental Matters – Environmental Laws and Regulations – Coal Combustion Residuals" herein and Note 6 to the financial statements for additional information.
Given the significant judgment involved in estimating AROs, Alabama Power considers the liabilities for AROs to be critical accounting estimates.
Pension and Other Postretirement Benefits
Alabama Power's calculation of pension and other postretirement benefits expense is dependent on a number of assumptions. These assumptions include discount rates, healthcare cost trend rates, expected long-term return on plan assets, mortality rates, expected salary and wage increases, and other factors. Components of pension and other postretirement benefits expense include interest and service cost on the pension and other postretirement benefit plans, expected return on plan assets, and amortization of certain unrecognized costs and obligations. Actual results that differ from the assumptions utilized are accumulated and amortized over future periods and, therefore, generally affect recognized expense and the recorded obligation in future periods. While Alabama Power believes that the assumptions used are appropriate, differences in actual experience or significant changes in assumptions would affect its pension and other postretirement benefit costs and obligations.
Key elements in determining Alabama Power's pension and other postretirement benefit expense are the expected long-term return on plan assets and the discount rate used to measure the benefit plan obligations and the periodic benefit plan expense for future periods. The expected long-term return on pension and other postretirement benefit plan assets is based on Southern Company's investment strategy, historical experience, and expectations for long-term rates of return that consider external actuarial advice. Southern Company determines the long-term return on plan assets by applying the long-term rate of expected returns on various asset classes to Southern Company's target asset allocation. For purposes of determining Alabama Power's liability related to the pension and other postretirement benefit plans, Southern Company discounts the future related cash flows using a single-point discount rate developed from the weighted average of market-observed yields for high quality fixed income securities with maturities that correspond to expected benefit payments.
A 25 basis point change in any significant assumption (discount rate, salary increases, or long-term rate of return on plan assets) would result in a $9 million or less change in total annual benefit expense, a $99 million or less change in the projected obligation for the pension plan, and an $11 million or less change in the projected obligation for other post retirement benefit plans.
Alabama Power recorded pension costs of $27 million, $9 million, and $11 million in 2018, 2017, and 2016, respectively. Postretirement benefit costs for Alabama Power were $2 million, $3 million, and $4 million in 2018, 2017, and 2016, respectively. Such amounts are dependent on several factors including trust earnings and changes to the plans. A portion of pension and other postretirement benefit costs is capitalized based on construction-related labor charges. Pension and other postretirement benefit costs are a component of the regulated rates and generally do not have a long-term effect on net income.
See Note 11 to the financial statements for additional information regarding pension and other postretirement benefits.
Contingent Obligations
Alabama Power is subject to a number of federal and state laws and regulations, as well as other factors and conditions that subject it to environmental, litigation, and other risks. See FUTURE EARNINGS POTENTIAL herein and Notes 2 and 3 to the financial statements for more information regarding certain of these contingencies. Alabama Power periodically evaluates its exposure to such risks and records reserves for those matters where a non-tax-related loss is considered probable and reasonably estimable. The adequacy of reserves can be significantly affected by external events or conditions that can be unpredictable; thus, the ultimate outcome of such matters could materially affect Alabama Power's results of operations, cash flows, or financial condition.

MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS (continued)
Alabama Power Company 2018 Annual Report

Recently Issued Accounting Standards
See Note 1 to the financial statements under "Recently Adopted Accounting Standards" for additional information.
In 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-02, Leases (Topic 842) (ASU 2016-02). ASU 2016-02 requires lessees to recognize on the balance sheet a lease liability and a right-of-use asset for all leases. ASU 2016-02 also changes the recognition, measurement, and presentation of expense associated with leases and provides clarification regarding the identification of certain components of contracts that would represent a lease. The accounting required by lessors is relatively unchanged. ASU 2016-02 is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2018 and Alabama Power adopted the new standard effective January 1, 2019.
Alabama Power elected the transition methodology provided by ASU No. 2018-11, Leases (Topic 842): Targeted Improvements, whereby the requirements of ASU 2016-02 are applied on a prospective basis as of the adoption date of January 1, 2019, without restating prior periods. Alabama Power elected the package of practical expedients provided by ASU 2016-02 that allows prior determinations of whether existing contracts are, or contain, leases and the classification of existing leases to continue without reassessment. Additionally, Alabama Power applied the use-of-hindsight practical expedient in determining lease terms as of the date of adoption and elected the practical expedient that allows existing land easements not previously accounted for as leases not to be reassessed. Alabama Power also made accounting policy elections to account for short-term leases in all asset classes as off-balance sheet leases and combined lease and non-lease components in the computations of lease obligations and right-of-use assets for most asset classes.
Alabama Power completed the implementation of a new application to track and account for its leases and updated its internal controls and accounting policies to support the accounting for leases under ASU 2016-02. Alabama Power completed its lease inventory and determined its most significant leases involve PPAs. In the first quarter 2019, the adoption of ASU 2016-02 resulted in recording lease liabilities and right-of-use assets on Alabama Power's balance sheet each totaling approximately $195 million, with no impact on Alabama Power's statement of income.
FINANCIAL CONDITION AND LIQUIDITY
Overview
Alabama Power's financial condition remained stable at December 31, 2018. Alabama Power's cash requirements primarily consist of funding ongoing operations, common stock dividends, capital expenditures, and debt maturities. Capital expenditures and other investing activities include investments to meet projected long-term demand requirements, to maintain existing generation facilities, to comply with environmental regulations including adding environmental modifications to certain existing generating units and closures of ash ponds, to expand and improve transmission and distribution facilities, and for restoration following major storms. Operating cash flows provide a substantial portion of Alabama Power's cash needs. For the three-year period from 2019 through 2021, Alabama Power's projected common stock dividends, capital expenditures, and debt maturities are expected to exceed operating cash flows. Alabama Power plans to finance future cash needs in excess of its operating cash flows primarily through external securities issuances, borrowings from financial institutions, or equity contributions from Southern Company. Alabama Power plans to use commercial paper to manage seasonal variations in operating cash flows and for other working capital needs. Alabama Power intends to continue to monitor its access to short-term and long-term capital markets as well as its bank credit arrangements to meet future capital and liquidity needs. See "Sources of Capital," "Financing Activities," and "Capital Requirements and Contractual Obligations" herein for additional information.
Alabama Power's investments in the qualified pension plan and the nuclear decommissioning trust funds decreased in value as of December 31, 2018 as compared to December 31, 2017. No contributions to the qualified pension plan were made for the year ended December 31, 2018 and no mandatory contributions to the qualified pension plan are anticipated during 2019. Alabama Power's funding obligations for the nuclear decommissioning trust funds are based on the most recent site study completed in 2018, and the next study is expected to be conducted by 2023. See Notes 6 and 11 to the financial statements under "Nuclear Decommissioning" and "Pension Plans," respectively, for additional information.
Net cash provided from operating activities totaled $1.9 billion for 2018, an increase of $44 million as compared to 2017. The increase in cash provided from operating activities was primarily due to an increase in weather-related revenues, fuel cost recovery, and income tax refunds received in 2018, partially offset by materials and supplies purchases, the timing of vendor payments, and settlement of AROs. Net cash provided from operating activities totaled $1.8 billion for 2017, a decrease of $112 million as compared to 2017. The decrease in cash provided from operating activities was primarily due to the timing of income tax payments in 2017 and the receipt of income tax refunds in 2016 as a result of bonus depreciation, partially offset by the voluntary contribution to the qualified pension plan in 2016.

MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS (continued)
Alabama Power Company 2018 Annual Report

Net cash used for investing activities totaled $2.3 billion for 2018, $1.9 billion for 2017, and $1.4 billion for 2016. These activities were primarily related to gross property additions for environmental, distribution, transmission, and steam generation assets.
Net cash provided from financing activities totaled $177 million in 2018 primarily due to issuances of long-term debt and additional capital contributions from Southern Company, partially offset by the payment of common stock dividends and a maturity of long-term debt. Net cash provided from financing activities totaled $163 million in 2017 primarily due to issuances of long-term debt and additional capital contributions from Southern Company, partially offset by the payment of common stock dividends and maturities of long-term debt. Fluctuations in cash flow from financing activities vary from year to year based on capital needs and the maturity or redemption of securities.
Significant balance sheet changes for 2018 included increases of $2.84 billion in property, plant, and equipment primarily due to $1.35 billion in AROs and additions to nuclear, distribution, and transmission assets. Other changes include $522 million in capital contributions from Southern Company and $295 million in long-term debt primarily due to a senior notes issuance. See Notes 6 and 8 to the financial statements for additional information related to changes in Alabama Power's AROs and financing activities, respectively.
Alabama Power's ratio of common equity to total capitalization plus short-term debt was 47.0% and 46.3% at December 31, 2018 and 2017, respectively. See Note 8 to the financial statements for additional information.
Sources of Capital
Alabama Power plans to obtain the funds to meet its future capital needs from sources similar to those used in the past, which were primarily from operating cash flows, external security issuances, borrowings from financial institutions, and equity contributions from Southern Company. However, the amount, type, and timing of any future financings, if needed, will depend upon prevailing market conditions, regulatory approval, and other factors. Subsequent to December 31, 2018, Alabama Power received a capital contribution totaling $1.225 billion from Southern Company.
Security issuances are subject to regulatory approval by the Alabama PSC. Additionally, with respect to the public offering of securities, Alabama Power files registration statements with the SEC under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended. The amounts of securities authorized by the Alabama PSC are continuously monitored and appropriate filings are made to ensure flexibility in the capital markets.
Alabama Power obtains financing separately without credit support from any affiliate. See Note 8 to the financial statements under "Bank Credit Arrangements" for additional information. The Southern Company system does not maintain a centralized cash or money pool. Therefore, funds of Alabama Power are not commingled with funds of any other company in the Southern Company system.
At December 31, 2018, Alabama Power's current liabilities exceeded current assets by $50 million. Alabama Power's current liabilities sometimes exceed current assets because of long-term debt maturities and the periodic use of short-term debt as a funding source, as well as significant seasonal fluctuations in cash needs.
At December 31, 2018, Alabama Power had approximately $313 million of cash and cash equivalents. Committed credit arrangements with banks at December 31, 2018 were as follows:
Expires     Expires Within One Year
2019 2020 2022 Total Unused Term Out No Term Out
(in millions) (in millions) (in millions)
$33
 $500
 $800
 $1,333
 $1,333
 $
 $33
See Note 8 to the financial statements under "Bank Credit Arrangements" for additional information.
Most of these bank credit arrangements, as well as Alabama Power's term loan arrangements, contain covenants that limit debt levels and contain cross-acceleration provisions to other indebtedness (including guarantee obligations) of Alabama Power. Such cross-acceleration provisions to other indebtedness would trigger an event of default if Alabama Power defaulted on indebtedness, the payment of which was then accelerated. At December 31, 2018, Alabama Power was in compliance with all such covenants. None of the bank credit arrangements contain material adverse change clauses at the time of borrowings.
Subject to applicable market conditions, Alabama Power expects to renew or replace its bank credit arrangements as needed prior to expiration. In connection therewith, Alabama Power may extend the maturity dates and/or increase or decrease the lending commitments thereunder.

MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS (continued)
Alabama Power Company 2018 Annual Report

A portion of the unused credit with banks is allocated to provide liquidity support to Alabama Power's pollution control revenue bonds and commercial paper programs. The amount of variable rate pollution control revenue bonds outstanding requiring liquidity support was $854 million at December 31, 2018.
Alabama Power also has substantial cash flow from operating activities and access to the capital markets, including a commercial paper program, to meet liquidity needs. Alabama Power may meet short-term cash needs through its commercial paper program. Alabama Power may also meet short-term cash needs through a Southern Company subsidiary organized to issue and sell commercial paper at the request and for the benefit of Alabama Power and the other traditional electric operating companies. Proceeds from such issuances for the benefit of Alabama Power are loaned directly to Alabama Power. The obligations of each traditional electric operating company under these arrangements are several and there is no cross-affiliate credit support.
Details of short-term borrowings were as follows:
 Short-term Debt at the End of the Period 
Short-term Debt During the Period (*)
 Amount Outstanding Weighted Average Interest Rate Average
Amount Outstanding
 Weighted
Average
Interest
Rate
 Maximum
Amount
Outstanding
 (in millions)   (in millions)   (in millions)
December 31, 2018$
 % $27
 2.3% $258
December 31, 2017$3
 3.7% $25
 1.3% $223
December 31, 2016$
 % $16
 0.6% $200
(*)Average and maximum amounts are based upon daily balances during the 12-month periods ended December 31, 2018, 2017, and 2016.
Alabama Power believes that the need for working capital can be adequately met by utilizing commercial paper programs, lines of credit, and operating cash flows.
Financing Activities
In June 2018, Alabama Power issued $500 million aggregate principal amount of Series 2018A 4.300% Senior Notes due July 15, 2048. The proceeds were used to repay outstanding commercial paper and for general corporate purposes, including Alabama Power's continuous construction program.
In October 2018, Alabama Power purchased and held $120 million aggregate principal amount of The Industrial Development Board of the City of Mobile, Alabama Pollution Control Revenue Bonds (Alabama Power Company Plant Barry Project), Series 2008. Alabama Power reoffered these bonds to the public in November 2018.
In November 2018, Alabama Power guaranteed a $100 million three-year bank term loan for SEGCO. See Note 9 to the financial statements under "Guarantees" for additional information.
Subsequent to December 31, 2018, Alabama Power repaid at maturity $200 million aggregate principal amount of Series Z 5.125% Senior Notes due February 15, 2019.
In addition to any financings that may be necessary to meet capital requirements and contractual obligations, Alabama Power plans to continue, when economically feasible, a program to retire higher-cost securities and replace these obligations with lower-cost capital if market conditions permit.
Credit Rating Risk
At December 31, 2018, Alabama Power did not have any credit arrangements that would require material changes in payment schedules or terminations as a result of a credit rating downgrade.

MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS (continued)
Alabama Power Company 2018 Annual Report

There are certain contracts that could require collateral, but not accelerated payment, in the event of a credit rating change to BBB and/or Baa2 or below. These contracts are primarily for physical electricity purchases, fuel purchases, fuel transportation and storage, energy price risk management, and transmission.
The maximum potential collateral requirements under these contracts at December 31, 2018 were as follows:
Credit Ratings
Maximum Potential
Collateral
Requirements
 (in millions)
At BBB and/or Baa2$1
At BBB- and/or Baa3$1
Below BBB- and/or Baa3$356
Included in these amounts are certain agreements that could require collateral in the event that either Alabama Power or Georgia Power (an affiliate of Alabama Power) has a credit rating change to below investment grade. Generally, collateral may be provided by a Southern Company guaranty, letter of credit, or cash. Additionally, a credit rating downgrade could impact the ability of Alabama Power to access capital markets and would be likely to impact the cost at which it does so.
On September 28, 2018, Fitch assigned a negative rating outlook to the ratings of Southern Company and certain of its subsidiaries (including Alabama Power).
Also on September 28, 2018, Moody's revised its rating outlook for Alabama Power from negative to stable.
As a result of the Tax Reform Legislation, certain financial metrics, such as the funds from operations to debt percentage, used by the credit rating agencies to assess Southern Company and its subsidiaries, including Alabama Power, may be negatively impacted. The modifications to Rate RSE and other commitments approved by the Alabama PSC are expected to help mitigate these potential adverse impacts to certain credit metrics and will help Alabama Power meet its goal of achieving an equity ratio of approximately 55% by the end of 2025. See Note 2 to the financial statements under "Alabama Power – Rate RSE" for additional information.
Market Price Risk
Due to cost-based rate regulation and other various cost recovery mechanisms, Alabama Power continues to have limited exposure to market volatility in interest rates, commodity fuel prices, and prices of electricity. To manage the volatility attributable to these exposures, Alabama Power nets the exposures, where possible, to take advantage of natural offsets and enters into various derivative transactions for the remaining exposures pursuant to Alabama Power's policies in areas such as counterparty exposure and risk management practices. Alabama Power's policy is that derivatives are to be used primarily for hedging purposes and mandates strict adherence to all applicable risk management policies. Derivative positions are monitored using techniques including, but not limited to, market valuation, value at risk, stress testing, and sensitivity analysis.
To mitigate future exposure to changes in interest rates, Alabama Power may enter into derivatives designated as hedges. The weighted average interest rate on $1.1 billion of long-term variable interest rate exposure at December 31, 2018 was 2.5%. If Alabama Power sustained a 100 basis point change in interest rates for all long-term variable interest rate exposure, the change would affect annualized interest expense by approximately $11 million at December 31, 2018. See Note 1 to the financial statements under "Financial Instruments" and Note 14 to the financial statements for additional information.
To mitigate residual risks relative to movements in electricity prices, Alabama Power enters into physical fixed-price contracts for the purchase and sale of electricity through the wholesale electricity market and financial hedge contracts for natural gas purchases. Alabama Power continues to manage a retail fuel-hedging program implemented per the guidelines of the Alabama PSC. Alabama Power had no material change in market risk exposure for the year ended December 31, 2018 when compared to the year ended December 31, 2017.
In addition, Rate ECR allows the recovery of specific costs associated with the sales of natural gas that become necessary due to operating considerations at Alabama Power's electric generating facilities. Rate ECR also allows recovery of the cost of financial instruments used for hedging market price risk up to 75% of the budgeted annual amount of natural gas purchases. Alabama Power may not engage in natural gas hedging activities that extend beyond a rolling 42-month window. Also, the premiums paid for natural gas financial options may not exceed 5% of Alabama Power's natural gas budget for that year.

MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS (continued)
Alabama Power Company 2018 Annual Report

The changes in fair value of energy-related derivative contracts are substantially attributable to both the volume and the price of natural gas. For the years ended December 31, the changes in fair value of energy-related derivative contracts, the majority of which are composed of regulatory hedges, were as follows:
 
2018
Changes
 
2017
Changes
 Fair Value
 (in millions)
Contracts outstanding at the beginning of the period, assets (liabilities), net$(6) $12
Contracts realized or settled(2) (1)
Current period changes(*)
4
 (17)
Contracts outstanding at the end of the period, assets (liabilities), net$(4) $(6)
(*)Current period changes also include the changes in fair value of new contracts entered into during the period, if any.
The net hedge volumes of energy-related derivative contracts at December 31, 2018 and 2017 were as follows:
 2018 2017
 mmBtu Volume
 (in millions)
Commodity – Natural gas swaps65
 64
Commodity – Natural gas options9
 5
Total hedge volume74
 69
The weighted average swap contract cost above market prices was approximately $0.08 per mmBtu at December 31, 2018 and December 31, 2017. The change in option fair value is primarily attributable to the volatility of the market and the underlying change in the natural gas price. Substantially all of the natural gas hedge gains and losses are recovered through Alabama Power's retail energy cost recovery clause.
At December 31, 2018 and 2017, substantially all of Alabama Power's energy-related derivative contracts were designated as regulatory hedges and were related to Alabama Power's fuel-hedging program. Therefore, gains and losses are initially recorded as regulatory liabilities and assets, respectively, and then are included in fuel expense as they are recovered through the energy cost recovery clause. Certain other gains and losses on energy-related derivatives, designated as cash flow hedges, are initially deferred in OCI before being recognized in income in the same period as the hedged transaction. Gains and losses on energy-related derivative contracts that are not designated or fail to qualify as hedges are recognized in the statements of income as incurred and were not material for any year presented.
Alabama Power uses over-the-counter contracts that are not exchange traded but are fair valued using prices which are market observable, and thus fall into Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy. See Note 13 to the financial statements for further discussion of fair value measurements. The maturities of the energy-related derivative contracts, which are primarily Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy, at December 31, 2018 were as follows:
   Fair Value Measurements
   December 31, 2018
 Total Maturity
 Fair Value  Year 1  Years 2&3
 (in millions)
Level 1$
 $
 $
Level 2(4) (1) (3)
Level 3
 
 
Fair value of contracts outstanding at end of period$(4) $(1) $(3)
Alabama Power is exposed to market price risk in the event of nonperformance by counterparties to energy-related and interest rate derivative contracts. Alabama Power only enters into agreements and material transactions with counterparties that have

MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS (continued)
Alabama Power Company 2018 Annual Report

investment grade credit ratings by Moody's and S&P, or with counterparties who have posted collateral to cover potential credit exposure. Therefore, Alabama Power does not anticipate market risk exposure from nonperformance by the counterparties. For additional information, see Note 1 to the financial statements under "Financial Instruments" and Note 14 to the financial statements.
Capital Requirements and Contractual Obligations
The construction program of Alabama Power is currently estimated to total $1.8 billion for 2019, $1.6 billion for 2020, $1.6 billion for 2021, $1.4 billion for 2022, and $1.5 billion for 2023. The construction program includes capital expenditures related to contractual purchase commitments for nuclear fuel and capital expenditures covered under LTSAs. Estimated capital expenditures to comply with environmental laws and regulations included in these amounts are $226 million for 2019, $68 million for 2020, $118 million for 2021, $112 million for 2022, and $111 million for 2023. These estimated expenditures do not include any potential compliance costs associated with pending regulation of CO2 emissions from fossil-fuel-fired electric generating units. See FUTURE EARNINGS POTENTIAL – "Environmental Matters – Environmental Laws and Regulations" and "– Global Climate Issues" herein for additional information.
Alabama Power also anticipates costs associated with closure-in-place and monitoring of ash ponds in accordance with the CCR Rule, which are reflected in Alabama Power's ARO liabilities. These costs, which are expected to change and could change materially as underlying assumptions are refined and the cost, method, and timing of compliance activities continue to be evaluated, are currently estimated to be $232 million for 2019, $238 million for 2020, $246 million for 2021, $252 million for 2022, and $258 million for 2023. See FUTURE EARNINGS POTENTIAL – "Environmental Matters – Environmental Laws and Regulations – Coal Combustion Residuals" herein and Note 6 to the financial statements for additional information. Costs associated with the CCR Rule are expected to be recovered through Rate CNP Compliance.
The construction program is subject to periodic review and revision, and actual construction costs may vary from these estimates because of numerous factors. These factors include: changes in business conditions; changes in load projections; changes in environmental laws and regulations; the outcome of any legal challenges to environmental rules; changes in generating plants, including unit retirements and replacements and adding or changing fuel sources at existing generating units, to meet regulatory requirements; changes in the expected environmental compliance program; changes in FERC rules and regulations; Alabama PSC approvals; changes in legislation; the cost and efficiency of construction labor, equipment, and materials; project scope and design changes; storm impacts; and the cost of capital. In addition, there can be no assurance that costs related to capital expenditures will be fully recovered.
As a result of NRC requirements, Alabama Power has external trust funds for nuclear decommissioning costs; however, Alabama Power currently has no additional funding requirements. For additional information, see Note 6 to the financial statements under "Nuclear Decommissioning."
In addition, as discussed in Note 11 to the financial statements, Alabama Power provides postretirement benefits to substantially all employees and funds trusts to the extent required by the Alabama PSC and the FERC.
Funding requirements related to obligations associated with scheduled maturities of long-term debt, as well as the related interest, derivative obligations, pension and other postretirement benefit plans, preferred stock dividends, leases, other purchase commitments, and ARO settlements are detailed in the contractual obligations table that follows. See Notes 1, 6, 8, 9, 11, and 14 to the financial statements for additional information.

MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS (continued)
Alabama Power Company 2018 Annual Report

Contractual Obligations
Contractual obligations at December 31, 2018 were as follows:
 2019 2020- 2021 2022- 2023 After 2023 Total
 (in millions)
Long-term debt(a) —
         
Principal$200
 $560
 $1,050
 $6,377
 $8,187
Interest330
 630
 575
 4,751
 6,286
Preferred stock dividends(b)
15
 29
 29
 
 73
Financial derivative obligations(c)
4
 6
 
 
 10
Operating leases(d)
12
 17
 9
 1
 39
Capital lease1
 1
 1
 1
 4
Purchase commitments —         
Capital(e)
1,671
 3,049
 2,536
 
 7,256
Fuel(f)
1,072
 1,342
 531
 1,108
 4,053
Purchased power(g)
83
 178
 140
 512
 913
Other(h)
42
 61
 61
 277
 441
ARO settlements(i)
232
 485
 510
 
 1,227
Pension and other postretirement benefit plans(j)
16
 32
 
 
 48
Total$3,678
 $6,390
 $5,442
 $13,027
 $28,537
(a)All amounts are reflected based on final maturity dates. Alabama Power plans to continue, when economically feasible, to retire higher-cost securities and replace these obligations with lower-cost capital if market conditions permit. Variable rate interest obligations are estimated based on rates at December 31, 2018, as reflected in the statements of capitalization. Fixed rates include, where applicable, the effects of interest rate derivatives employed to manage interest rate risk. Long-term debt excludes capital lease amounts (shown separately).
(b)Preferred stock does not mature; therefore, amounts are provided for the next five years only.
(c)Includes derivative liabilities related to cash flow hedges of forecasted debt, as well as energy-related derivatives. For additional information, see Notes 1 and 14 to the financial statements.
(d)Excludes PPAs that are accounted for as leases and are included in purchased power.
(e)Alabama Power provides estimated capital expenditures for a five-year period, including capital expenditures associated with environmental regulations. These amounts exclude contractual purchase commitments for nuclear fuel, capital expenditures covered under LTSAs, and estimated capital expenditures for AROs, which are reflected in "Fuel," "Other," and "ARO settlements," respectively. At December 31, 2018, purchase commitments were outstanding in connection with the construction program. See FUTURE EARNINGS POTENTIAL – "Environmental Matters – Environmental Laws and Regulations" herein for additional information.
(f)Includes commitments to purchase coal, nuclear fuel, and natural gas, as well as the related transportation and storage. In most cases, these contracts contain provisions for price escalation, minimum purchase levels, and other financial commitments. Natural gas purchase commitments are based on various indices at the time of delivery. Amounts reflected for natural gas purchase commitments have been estimated based on the NYMEX future prices at December 31, 2018.
(g)Estimated minimum long-term obligations for various long-term commitments for the purchase of capacity and energy.
(h)Includes LTSAs and contracts for the procurement of limestone. LTSAs include price escalation based on inflation indices.
(i)
Represents estimated costs for a five-year period associated with closing and monitoring ash ponds in accordance with the CCR Rule and the related state rule, which are reflected in Alabama Power's ARO liabilities. Material expenditures in future years for ARO settlements also will be required for ash ponds, nuclear decommissioning, and other liabilities reflected in Alabama Power's AROs. See FUTURE EARNINGS POTENTIAL – "Environmental MattersEnvironmental Laws and RegulationsCoal Combustion Residuals" herein and Note 6 to the financial statements for additional information.
(j)Alabama Power forecasts contributions to the pension and other postretirement benefit plans over a three-year period. Alabama Power anticipates no mandatory contributions to the qualified pension plan during the next three years. Amounts presented represent estimated benefit payments for the nonqualified pension plans, estimated non-trust benefit payments for the other postretirement benefit plans, and estimated contributions to the other postretirement benefit plan trusts, all of which will be made from Alabama Power's corporate assets. See Note 11 to the financial statements for additional information related to the pension and other postretirement benefit plans, including estimated benefit payments. Certain benefit payments will be made through the related benefit plans. Other benefit payments will be made from Alabama Power's corporate assets.

MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
Georgia Power Company 2018 Annual Report



OVERVIEW
Business Activities
Georgia Power operates as a vertically integrated utility providing electric service to retail customers within its traditional service territory located within the State of Georgia and to wholesale customers in the Southeast.
Many factors affect the opportunities, challenges, and risks of Georgia Power's business of providing electric service. These factors include the ability to maintain a constructive regulatory environment, to maintain and grow energy sales and customers, and to effectively manage and secure timely recovery of costs. These costs include those related to projected long-term demand growth, stringent environmental standards, including CCR rules, reliability, fuel, capital expenditures, including new generating facilities and expanding and improving transmission and distribution facilities, and restoration following major storms. Georgia Power has various regulatory mechanisms that operate to address cost recovery. Effectively operating pursuant to these regulatory mechanisms and appropriately balancing required costs and capital expenditures with customer prices will continue to challenge Georgia Power for the foreseeable future. On April 3, 2018, the Georgia PSC approved the Georgia Power Tax Reform Settlement Agreement, which provides for a total of $330 million in customer refunds for 2018 and 2019 and the deferral of certain revenues and tax benefits to be addressed in the Georgia Power 2019 Base Rate Case. The Georgia PSC also approved an increase to Georgia Power's retail equity ratio to address some of the negative cash flow and credit metric impacts of the Tax Reform Legislation. See FUTURE EARNINGS POTENTIAL – "Retail Regulatory Matters – Rate Plans" herein for additional information on the Georgia Power Tax Reform Settlement Agreement.
Georgia Power continues to focus on several key performance indicators, including, but not limited to, customer satisfaction, plant availability, system reliability, the execution of major construction projects, and net income. Georgia Power's financial success is directly tied to customer satisfaction. Key elements of ensuring customer satisfaction include outstanding service, high reliability, and competitive prices. Management uses customer satisfaction surveys to evaluate Georgia Power's results and generally targets the top quartile of these surveys in measuring performance.
See RESULTS OF OPERATIONS herein for information on Georgia Power's financial performance.
Plant Vogtle Units 3 and 4 Status
In 2009, the Georgia PSC certified construction of Plant Vogtle Units 3 and 4 (with electric generating capacity of approximately 1,100 MWs each). Georgia Power holds a 45.7% ownership interest in Plant Vogtle Units 3 and 4. In March 2017, the EPC Contractor filed for bankruptcy protection under Chapter 11 of the U.S. Bankruptcy Code. In December 2017, the Georgia PSC approved Georgia Power's recommendation to continue construction. The current expected in-service dates remain November 2021 for Unit 3 and November 2022 for Unit 4.
In the second quarter 2018, Georgia Power revised its base capital cost forecast and estimated contingency to complete construction and start-up of Plant Vogtle Units 3 and 4 to $8.0 billion and $0.4 billion, respectively, for a total project capital cost forecast of $8.4 billion (net of $1.7 billion received under the Guarantee Settlement Agreement and approximately $188 million in related Customer Refunds), with respect to Georgia Power's ownership interest. Although Georgia Power believes these incremental costs are reasonable and necessary to complete the project and the Georgia PSC's order in the seventeenth VCM proceeding specifically states that the construction of Plant Vogtle Units 3 and 4 is not subject to a cost cap, Georgia Power did not seek rate recovery for the $0.7 billion increase in costs included in the current base capital cost forecast (or any related financing costs) in the nineteenth VCM report that was approved by the Georgia PSC on February 19, 2019. In connection with future VCM filings, Georgia Power may request the Georgia PSC to evaluate costs currently included in the construction contingency estimate for rate recovery as and when they are appropriately included in the base capital cost forecast. After considering the significant level of uncertainty that exists regarding the future recoverability of costs included in the construction contingency estimate since the ultimate outcome of these matters is subject to the outcome of future assessments by management, as well as Georgia PSC decisions in these future regulatory proceedings, Georgia Power recorded a total pre-tax charge to income of $1.1 billion ($0.8 billion after tax) in the second quarter 2018.
As a result of the increase in the total project capital cost forecast and Georgia Power's decision not to seek rate recovery of the increase in the base capital costs, the holders of at least 90% of the ownership interests in Plant Vogtle Units 3 and 4 were required to vote to continue construction. On September 26, 2018, the Vogtle Owners unanimously voted to continue construction of Plant Vogtle Units 3 and 4. In connection with the vote to continue construction, Georgia Power entered into (i) a binding term sheet (Vogtle Owner Term Sheet) with the other Vogtle Owners and certain of MEAG's wholly-owned subsidiaries, including MEAG Power SPVJ, LLC (MEAG SPVJ), to take certain actions which partially mitigate potential financial exposure for the other Vogtle Owners and (ii) a term sheet (MEAG Term Sheet) with MEAG and MEAG SPVJ to provide funding with respect to MEAG

MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS (continued)
Georgia Power Company 2018 Annual Report

SPVJ's ownership interest in Plant Vogtle Units 3 and 4 under certain circumstances. On January 14, 2019, Georgia Power, MEAG, and MEAG SPVJ entered into an agreement to implement the provisions of the MEAG Term Sheet. On February 18, 2019, Georgia Power, the other Vogtle Owners, and certain of MEAG's wholly-owned subsidiaries entered into certain amendments to their joint ownership agreements to implement the provisions of the Vogtle Owner Term Sheet.
The ultimate outcome of these matters cannot be determined at this time.
See FUTURE EARNINGS POTENTIAL – "Retail Regulatory Matters – Nuclear Construction" herein for additional information on Plant Vogtle Units 3 and 4.
Earnings
Georgia Power's 2018 net income after dividends on preferred and preference stock was $0.8 billion, representing a $621 million, or 43.9%, decrease from the previous year. The Company'sdecrease was due primarily to a $1.1 billion ($0.8 billion after tax) charge in the second quarter 2018 for an estimated probable loss related to Georgia Power's construction of Plant Vogtle Units 3 and 4, revenues deferred as a regulatory liability for customer bill credits related to the Tax Reform Legislation, an adjustment for an expected refund to retail customers as a result of Georgia Power's retail ROE exceeding the allowed retail ROE range under the 2013 ARP in 2018, and higher non-fuel operations and maintenance expenses. Partially offsetting the decrease were lower federal income tax expense as a result of the Tax Reform Legislation and an increase in retail revenues associated with colder weather in the first quarter 2018 and warmer weather in the second and third quarters 2018 compared to the corresponding periods in 2017.
Georgia Power's 2017 net income after dividends on preferred and preference stock was $1.4 billion, representing aan $84 million, or 6.3%, increase overfrom the previous year. The increase was due primarily to lower non-fuel operations and maintenance expenses, primarily as a result of cost containment and modernization initiatives, partially offset by lower revenues resulting from milder weather and lower customer usage as compared to 2016.
The Company's 2016 net
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
A condensed income after dividends on preferred and preference stock was $1.3 billion, representing a $70 million, or 5.6%, increase over the previous year. The increase was due primarily to an increase in base retail revenues effective January 1,statement for Georgia Power follows:
 Amount 
Increase (Decrease)
from Prior Year
 2018 2018 2017
 (in millions)
Operating revenues$8,420
 $110
 $(73)
Fuel1,698
 27
 (136)
Purchased power1,153
 115
 159
Other operations and maintenance1,860
 136
 (279)
Depreciation and amortization923
 28
 40
Taxes other than income taxes437
 28
 4
Estimated loss on Plant Vogtle Units 3 and 41,060
 1,060
 
Total operating expenses7,131
 1,394
 (212)
Operating income1,289
 (1,284) 139
Interest expense, net of amounts capitalized397
 (22) 31
Other income (expense), net115
 11
 23
Income taxes214
 (616) 50
Net income793
 (635) 81
Dividends on preferred and preference stock
 (14) (3)
Net income after dividends on preferred and preference stock$793
 $(621) $84
    Table of Contents                                Index to Financial Statements

MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS (continued)
Georgia Power Company 20172018 Annual Report

2016,Operating Revenues
Operating revenues for 2018 were $8.4 billion, reflecting a $110 million increase from 2017. Details of operating revenues were as authorized by the Georgia PSC, the 2015 correctionfollows:
 2018 2017
 (in millions)
Retail — prior year$7,738
 $7,772
Estimated change resulting from —   
Rates and pricing(363) 114
Sales growth (decline)92
 (33)
Weather131
 (166)
Fuel cost recovery154
 51
Retail — current year7,752
 7,738
Wholesale revenues —   
Non-affiliates163
 163
Affiliates24
 26
Total wholesale revenues187
 189
Other operating revenues481
 383
Total operating revenues$8,420
 $8,310
Percent change1.3% (0.9)%
Retail revenues of a customer billing error, and higher retail revenues$7.8 billion in 2018 increased $14 million, or 0.2%, compared to 2017. The significant factors driving this change are shown in the third quarter 2016preceding table. The decrease in rates and pricing was primarily due to warmer weatherrevenues deferred as compareda regulatory liability for customer bill credits related to the corresponding period in 2015, partially offset byTax Reform Legislation and an adjustment for an expected refund to retail customers as a result of the Company'sGeorgia Power's retail ROE exceeding the allowed retail ROE range allowed under the 2013 ARP during 2016. Higher non-fuel operating expenses also partially offset the revenue increase.
in 2018. See Note 12 to the financial statements under "General" and FUTURE EARNINGS POTENTIAL – "Retail Regulatory Matters"Georgia Power – Rate Plans" herein for additional information related to the 2015 error correction and the refund to retail customers, respectively.
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
A condensed income statement for the Company follows:
 Amount 
Increase (Decrease)
from Prior Year
 2017 2017 2016
 (in millions)
Operating revenues$8,310
 $(73) $57
Fuel1,671
 (136) (226)
Purchased power1,038
 159
 15
Other operations and maintenance1,653
 (307) 116
Depreciation and amortization895
 40
 9
Taxes other than income taxes409
 4
 14
Total operating expenses5,666
 (240) (72)
Operating income2,644
 167
 129
Interest expense, net of amounts capitalized419
 31
 25
Other income (expense), net33
 (5) (23)
Income taxes830
 50
 11
Net income1,428
 81
 70
Dividends on preferred and preference stock14
 (3) 
Net income after dividends on preferred and preference stock$1,414
 $84
 $70

MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS (continued)
Georgia Power Company 2017 Annual Report

Operating Revenues
Operating revenues for 2017 were $8.3 billion, reflecting a $73 million decrease from 2016. Details of operating revenues were as follows:
 Amount
 2017 2016
 (in millions)
Retail — prior year$7,772
 $7,727
Estimated change resulting from —   
Rates and pricing114
 154
Sales decline(33) (10)
Weather(166) 113
Fuel cost recovery51
 (212)
Retail — current year7,738
 7,772
Wholesale revenues —   
Non-affiliates163
 175
Affiliates26
 42
Total wholesale revenues189
 217
Other operating revenues383
 394
Total operating revenues$8,310
 $8,383
Percent change(0.9)% 0.7%
information.
Retail revenues of $7.7 billion in 2017 decreased $34 million, or 0.4%, compared to 2016. The significant factors driving this change are shown in the preceding table. The increase in rates and pricing was primarily due to an increase in revenues related to the recovery of Plant Vogtle Units 3 and 4 construction financing costs under the NCCR tariff.
Retail revenues of $7.8 billion in 2016 increased $45 million, or 0.6%, compared to 2015. The significant factors driving this change are shown in the preceding table. The increase in rates and pricing was primarily due to increases in base tariffs approved under the 2013 ARP and the NCCR tariff, all effective January 1, 2016, and the 2015 correction of a customer billing error. The increase was partially offset by an adjustment for an expected refund to retail customers as a result of the Company's retail ROE exceeding the retail ROE range allowed under the 2013 ARP during 2016.
See Note 12 to the financial statements under "General""Georgia Power – Nuclear Construction – Regulatory Matters" for additional information on the customer billing error correction and Note 3 to the financial statements under "Retail Regulatory Matters – Rate Plans" and " – Nuclear Construction" for additional information on the rate changes. Also seeNCCR tariff.
See "Energy Sales" below for a discussion of changes in the volume of energy sold, including changes related to sales declinegrowth (decline) and weather.
Electric rates include provisions to adjust billings for fluctuations in fuel costs, including the energy component of purchased power costs. Under these fuel cost recovery provisions, fuel revenues generally equal fuel expenses and do not affect net income. See FUTURE EARNINGS POTENTIAL – "Retail Regulatory Matters – Fuel Cost Recovery" herein for additional information.
Wholesale revenues from power sales to non-affiliated utilities were as follows:
2017 2016 20152018 2017 2016
(in millions)(in millions)
Capacity and other$67
 $72
 $108
$54
 $67
 $72
Energy96
 103
 107
109
 96
 103
Total non-affiliated$163
 $175
 $215
$163
 $163
 $175
Wholesale capacity revenues from PPAs are recognized either on a levelized basis over the appropriate contract period or the amounts billable under the contract terms and provide for recovery of fixed costs and a return on investment. Wholesale revenues from sales to non-affiliates will vary depending on fuel prices, the market prices of wholesale energy compared to the cost of the Company'sGeorgia Power's and the Southern Company system's generation, demand for energy within the Southern Company system's electric service territory, and the availability of the Southern Company system's generation. Increases and decreases in energy revenues that are driven by fuel prices are accompanied by an increase or decrease in fuel costs and do not have a significant
    Table of Contents                                Index to Financial Statements

MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS (continued)
Georgia Power Company 20172018 Annual Report

that are driven by fuel prices are accompanied by an increase or decrease in fuel costs and do not have a significant impact on net income. Short-term opportunity sales are made at market-based rates that generally provide a margin above the Company'sGeorgia Power's variable cost of energy.
Wholesale revenues from non-affiliated sales remained flat in 2018 as compared to 2017. Capacity revenues decreased $13 million, offset by a $13 million increase in energy revenues. The decrease in capacity revenues was primarily due to the expiration of a wholesale contract in the fourth quarter 2017. The increase in energy revenues was primarily due to increased demand, partially offset by the effects of expired contracts. Wholesale revenues from non-affiliated sales decreased $12 million, or 6.9%, in 2017 as compared to 2016 and decreased $40 million, or 18.6%, in 2016 as compared to 2015.2016. The decrease in 2017 was related to decreases of $5 million in capacity revenues and $7 million in energy revenues. The decrease in 2016 was related to decreases of $36 million in capacity revenues and $4 million in energy revenues. The decreases in capacity revenues reflectreflects the expiration of wholesale contracts in the first and second quarters of 2016. The decrease in capacity revenues in 2016 also reflects the retirement of 14 coal-fired generating units since March 31, 2015 as a result of the Company's environmental compliance strategy. The decrease in energy revenues in 2017 was primarily due to lower demand and the effects of the expired contracts. The decrease in energy revenues in 2016 was primarily due to lower fuel prices. See FUTURE EARNINGS POTENTIAL – "Environmental Matters – Environmental Laws and Regulations – Air Quality" herein for additional information regarding the Company's environmental compliance strategy.
Wholesale revenues from sales to affiliated companies will vary depending on demand and the availability and cost of generating resources at each company. These affiliate sales are made in accordance with the Intercompany Interchange Contract (IIC),IIC, as approved by the FERC. These transactions do not have a significant impact on earnings since this energy is generally sold at marginal cost. In 2018, wholesale revenues from sales to affiliates decreased $2 million as compared to 2017. In 2017, wholesale revenues from sales to affiliates decreased $16 million as compared to 2016 due to a 42.8% decrease in KWH sales as a result of the lower market cost of available energy compared to the cost of Company-ownedGeorgia Power-owned generation. In 2016, wholesale
Other operating revenues increased $98 million, or 25.6%, in 2018 from sales to affiliates increased $22 million as compared to 2015the prior year largely due to a 153.5% increase in KWH$94 million of revenues primarily from unregulated sales of products and services that were reclassified as other revenues as a result of the lower costadoption of Company-owned generation comparedASC 606, Revenue from Contracts with Customers (ASC 606). In prior periods, these revenues were included in other income (expense), net. See Note 1 to the market costfinancial statements for additional information regarding Georgia Power's adoption of available energy, partially offset by lower coal and natural gas prices.ASC 606.
Other operating revenues decreased $11 million, or 2.8%, in 2017 from the prior year primarily due to a $15 million decrease in open access transmission tariff revenues, primarily as a result of the expiration of long-term transmission services contracts, and a $14 million adjustment in 2016 for customer temporary facilities services revenues, partially offset by a $13 million increase in outdoor lighting sales revenues due to increased sales in new and replacement markets, primarily attributable to LED conversions.
Other operating revenues increased $30 million, or 8.2%, in 2016 from the prior year primarily due to a $14 million increase related to customer temporary facilities services revenues and a $12 million increase in outdoor lighting revenues due to increased sales in new and replacement markets, primarily attributable to LED conversions.
Energy Sales
Changes in revenues are influenced heavily by the change in the volume of energy sold from year to year. KWH sales for 20172018 and the percent change from the prior year were as follows:
Total
KWHs
 
Total KWH
Percent Change
 
Weather-Adjusted
Percent Change
Total
KWHs
 
Total KWH
Percent Change
 
Weather-Adjusted
Percent Change
2017 2017 2016 2017 20162018 2018 2017 2018 2017
(in billions)        (in billions)        
Residential26.1
 (5.2)% 3.5 % (0.2)% 1.0 %28.3
 8.4 % (5.2)% 2.6% (0.2)%
Commercial32.2
 (2.4) 0.7
 (0.9) (1.0)33.0
 2.5
 (2.4) 1.6
 (0.9)
Industrial23.5
 (1.0) (0.2) (0.1) (0.9)23.7
 0.6
 (1.0) 0.2
 (0.1)
Other0.6
 (4.2) (3.5) (4.0) (3.5)0.5
 (6.0) (4.2) (6.3) (4.0)
Total retail82.4
 (2.9) 1.3
 (0.4)% (0.4)%85.5
 3.8
 (2.9) 1.5% (0.4)%
Wholesale                  
Non-affiliates3.3
 (4.0) (2.5)    3.2
 (4.2) (4.0)    
Affiliates0.8
 (42.8) 153.5
    0.5
 (34.2) (42.8)    
Total wholesale4.1
 (15.3) 18.8
    3.7
 (10.1) (15.3)    
Total energy sales86.5
 (3.6)% 2.1 %    89.2
 3.1 % (3.6)%    
Changes in retail energy sales are generally the result of changes in electricity usage by customers, changes in weather, and changes in the number of customers.
In 2018, KWH sales for the residential class increased 8.4% compared to 2017 primarily due to colder weather in the first quarter 2018 and warmer weather in the second and third quarters 2018 compared to the corresponding periods in 2017. Weather-adjusted residential KWH sales and weather-adjusted commercial KWH sales increased by 2.6% and 1.6%, respectively, largely due to customer growth. Weather-adjusted industrial KWH sales were essentially flat primarily due to increased demand in the primary and fabricated metal sectors, offset by decreased demand in the textiles and stone, clay, and glass sectors. Additionally, customer usage for all customer classes increased due to the negative impacts of Hurricane Irma in 2017.

MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS (continued)
Georgia Power Company 2018 Annual Report

In 2017, KWH sales for the residential class decreased 5.2% compared to 2016 primarily due to milder weather in 2017. Weather-adjusted residential KWH sales decreased by 0.2% primarily due to a decline in average customer usage resulting from an

MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS (continued)
Georgia Power Company 2017 Annual Report

increase in multi-family housing and energy saving initiatives, partially offset by customer growth. Weather-adjusted commercial KWH sales decreased by 0.9% primarily due to a decline in average customer usage resulting from an increase in electronic commerce transactions and energy saving initiatives, partially offset by customer growth. Weather-adjusted industrial KWH sales were essentially flat primarily due to decreased demand in the chemicals and paper sectors, offset by increased demand in the textile, non-manufacturing, and rubber sectors. Additionally, Hurricane Irma negatively impacted customer usage for all customer classes for the period.
In 2016, KWH sales for the residential class increased 3.5% compared to 2015 primarily due to warmer weather in the third quarter 2016 as compared to the corresponding period in 2015 and increased customer growth, partially offset by decreased customer usage. Weather-adjusted residential KWH sales increased by 1.0% primarily due to an increase of approximately 28,000 residential customers since December 31, 2015, partially offset by a decline in customer usage primarily resulting from an increase in multi-family housing and efficiency improvements in residential appliances and lighting. Weather-adjusted commercial KWH sales decreased by 1.0% primarily due to a decline in average customer usage resulting from an increase in electronic commerce transactions and energy saving initiatives, partially offset by an increase of approximately 2,600 commercial customers since December 31, 2015. Weather-adjusted industrial KWH sales decreased 0.9% primarily due to decreased demand in the pipeline, primary metals, stone, clay, and glass, and textile sectors, partially offset by increased demand in the non-manufacturing sector.2017.
See "Operating Revenues" above for a discussion of significant changes in wholesale sales to non-affiliates and affiliated companies.
Fuel and Purchased Power Expenses
Fuel costs constitute one of the largest expenses for the Company.Georgia Power. The mix of fuel sources for the generation of electricity is determined primarily by demand, the unit cost of fuel consumed, and the availability of generating units. Additionally, the CompanyGeorgia Power purchases a portion of its electricity needs from the wholesale market.
Details of the Company'sGeorgia Power's generation and purchased power were as follows:
2017 2016 20152018 2017 2016
Total generation (in billions of KWHs)
63.2
 68.4
 65.9
65.2
 63.2
 68.4
Total purchased power (in billions of KWHs)
26.9
 24.8
 25.6
27.9
 26.9
 24.8
Sources of generation (percent)
          
Gas41
 38
 39
42
 41
 38
Coal32
 36
 34
30
 32
 36
Nuclear25
 24
 25
25
 25
 24
Hydro2
 2
 2
3
 2
 2
Cost of fuel, generated (in cents per net KWH)
          
Gas2.68
 2.36
 2.47
2.75
 2.68
 2.36
Coal3.17
 3.28
 4.55
3.21
 3.17
 3.28
Nuclear0.83
 0.85
 0.78
0.82
 0.83
 0.85
Average cost of fuel, generated (in cents per net KWH)
2.36
 2.33
 2.77
2.40
 2.36
 2.33
Average cost of purchased power (in cents per net KWH)(*)
4.62
 4.53
 4.33
4.79
 4.62
 4.53
(*) Average cost of purchased power includes fuel purchased by the CompanyGeorgia Power for tolling agreements where power is generated by the provider.
Fuel and purchased power expenses were $2.9 billion in 2018, an increase of $142 million, or 5.2%, compared to 2017. The increase was primarily due to a $74 million increase in the average cost of fuel and purchased power primarily related to higher natural gas and energy prices and an increase of $68 million related to the volume of KWHs generated and purchased primarily due to colder weather in the first quarter 2018 and warmer weather in the second and third quarters 2018 compared to the corresponding periods in 2017.
Fuel and purchased power expenses were $2.7 billion in 2017, an increase of $23 million, or 0.9%, compared to 2016. The increase was primarily due to an $84 million increase in the average cost of fuel and purchased power primarily related to higher natural gas prices, partially offset by a net decrease of $61 million related to the volume of KWHs generated and purchased primarily due to milder weather, resulting in lower customer demand.
Fuel and purchased power expenses were $2.7 billion in 2016, a decrease of $211 million, or 7.3%, compared to 2015. The decrease was primarily due to a $285 million net decrease in the average cost of fuel and purchased power due to lower coal and natural gas prices, partially offset by a $74 million net increase in the volume of KWHs generated and purchased to meet customer demand.

MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS (continued)
Georgia Power Company 2017 Annual Report

Fuel and purchased power energy transactions do not have a significant impact on earnings since these fuel expenses are generally offset by fuel revenues through the Company'sGeorgia Power's fuel cost recovery mechanism. See FUTURE EARNINGS POTENTIAL – "Retail Regulatory Matters – Fuel Cost Recovery" herein for additional information.
Fuel
Fuel expense was $1.7 billion in 2018, an increase of $27 million, or 1.6%, compared to 2017. The increase was primarily due to an increase of 2.6% in the average cost of natural gas per KWH generated and an increase of 1.9% in the volume of KWHs generated largely due to colder weather in the first quarter 2018 and warmer weather in the second and third quarters 2018 compared to the corresponding periods in 2017. Fuel expense was $1.7 billion in 2017, a decrease of $136 million, or 7.5%,

MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS (continued)
Georgia Power Company 2018 Annual Report

compared to 2016. The decrease was primarily due to a decrease of 7.7% in the volume of KWHs generated largely due to milder weather, resulting in lower customer demand, partially offset by an increase of 13.6% in the average cost of natural gas per KWH generated. Fuel expense was $1.8 billion in 2016, a decrease of $226 million, or 11.1%, compared to 2015. The decrease was primarily due to a decrease of 18.6% in the average cost of coal and natural gas per KWH generated, partially offset by an increase of 10.0% in the volume of KWHs generated by coal.
Purchased Power - Non-Affiliates
Purchased power expense from non-affiliates was $430 million in 2018, an increase of $14 million, or 3.4%, compared to 2017. The increase was primarily due to an 8.5% increase in the average cost per KWH purchased primarily due to higher energy prices, partially offset by a decrease of 3.8% in volume of KWHs purchased primarily due to the higher market cost of available energy as compared to Southern Company system resources. Purchased power expense from non-affiliates was $416 million in 2017, an increase of $55 million, or 15.2%, compared to 2016. The increase was primarily due to a 13.4% increase in the volume of KWHs purchased primarily due to unplanned outages at Company-ownedGeorgia Power-owned generating units. Purchased power expense from non-affiliates was $361 million in 2016, an increase of $72 million, or 24.9%, compared to 2015. The increase was primarily due to a 36.8% increase in the volume of KWHs purchased to meet customer demand, partially offset by a 12.5% decrease in the average cost per KWH purchased due to lower natural gas prices.
Energy purchases from non-affiliates will vary depending on the market prices of wholesale energy as compared to the cost of the Southern Company system's generation, demand for energy within the Southern Company system's electric service territory, and the availability of the Southern Company system's generation.
Purchased Power - Affiliates
Purchased power expense from affiliates was $723 million in 2018, an increase of $101 million, or 16.2%, compared to 2017. The increase was primarily due to a 6.3% increase in the volume of KWHs purchased due to colder weather in the first quarter 2018 and scheduled generation outages and warmer weather in the second and third quarters 2018 and a 3.0% increase in the average cost per KWH purchased primarily resulting from higher energy prices. Purchased power expense from affiliates was $622 million in 2017, an increase of $104 million, or 20.1%, compared to 2016. The increase was primarily due to a 7.0% increase in the volume of KWHs purchased to support Southern Company system transmission reliability and as a result of unplanned outages at Company-ownedGeorgia Power-owned generating units and a 1.8% increase in the average cost per KWH purchased primarily resulting from higher natural gas prices. Purchased power expense from affiliates was $518 million in 2016, a decrease of $57 million, or 9.9%, compared to 2015. The decrease was primarily due to an 11.9% decrease in the volume of KWHs purchased due to the lower market cost of available energy as compared to Southern Company system resources, partially offset by a 6.2% increase in the average cost per KWH purchased.
Energy purchases from affiliates will vary depending on the demand and the availability and cost of generating resources at each company within the Southern Company system. These purchases are made in accordance with the IIC or other contractual agreements, all as approved by the FERC.
Other Operations and Maintenance Expenses
In 2018, other operations and maintenance expenses increased $136 million, or 7.9%, compared to 2017. The increase was primarily due to $88 million of expenses from unregulated sales of products and services that were reclassified to other operations and maintenance expenses as a result of the adoption of ASC 606. In prior periods, these expenses were included in other income (expense), net. Also contributing to the increase were a $39 million decrease in gains on sales of assets and a $28 million increase in transmission and distribution overhead line maintenance, primarily related to additional vegetation management, partially offset by a decrease of $18 million associated with an employee attrition plan in 2017. See Note 1 to the financial statements for additional information regarding Georgia Power's adoption of ASC 606.
In 2017, other operations and maintenance expenses decreased $307$279 million, or 15.7%13.9%, compared to 2016. The decrease was primarily due to cost containment and modernization activities implemented in the third quarter 2016 that contributed to decreases of $85 million in generation maintenance costs, $49 million in employee benefits, $46 million in transmission and distribution overhead line maintenance, $22 million in employee benefits, and $22 million in customer accounts and sales costs. Other factors include a $40 million increase in gains fromon sales of assets, a $19 million decrease in scheduled generation outage costs, and a $15 million decrease in customer assistance expenses, primarily in demand-side management costs related to the timing of new programs.
In 2016, other operationsDepreciation and maintenance expensesAmortization
Depreciation and amortization increased $116$28 million, or 6.3%3.1%, in 2018 compared to 2015.2017. The increase was primarily due to a $37 million decreaseadditional plant in gains from sales of assets, a $36 million charge in connection with cost containment activities, a $30 million increase in overhead line maintenance, a $15 million increase in hydro and gas generation maintenance, a $10 million increase in customer accounts, service, and sales costs, and a $7 million increase in material costs related to higher generation volumes. The increase was partially offset by a decrease of $36 million in pension costs.
See FUTURE EARNINGS POTENTIAL – "Other Matters" herein and Note 2 to the financial statements for additional information related to the cost containment and modernization activities and pension costs, respectively.
Depreciation and Amortizationservice.
Depreciation and amortization increased $40 million, or 4.7%, in 2017 compared to 2016. The increase was primarily due to a $33 million increase related to additional plant in service and a $14 million decrease in amortization of regulatory liabilities

MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS (continued)
Georgia Power Company 2017 Annual Report

related to other cost of removal obligations that expired in December 2016, partially offset by a $9 million decrease in depreciation related to generating unit retirements in 2016 and amortization of regulatory assets related to certain cancelled environmental and fuel conversion projects that expired in December 2016.
Depreciation and amortization increased $9 million, or 1.1%, in 2016 compared to 2015. The increase was primarily due to a $34 million increase related to additional plant in service and a $9 million increase in other cost of removal, partially offset by an $18 million decrease related to amortization of certain nuclear construction financing costs that was completed in December 2015 and a decrease of $16 million related to unit retirements.
See Note 15 to the financial statements under "Depreciation and Amortization" for additional information.

MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS (continued)
Georgia Power Company 2018 Annual Report

Taxes Other Than Income Taxes
In 2017,2018, taxes other than income taxes increased $4$28 million, or 1.0%6.8%, compared to 2016. In 2016, taxes other than income taxes increased $14 million, or 3.6%, compared to 20152017 primarily due to increases of $7$19 million in property taxes as a result of an increase in the assessed value of property and $11 million in municipal franchise fees largely related to higher retail revenues. In 2017, taxes other than income taxes increased $4 million, or 1.0%, compared to 2016.
Estimated Loss on Plant Vogtle Units 3 and 4
In the second quarter 2018, an estimated probable loss of $1.1 billion was recorded to reflect Georgia Power's revised estimate to complete construction and start-up of Plant Vogtle Units 3 and 4, which reflects the increase in payroll taxes.costs included in the revised base capital cost forecast for which Georgia Power did not seek rate recovery and costs included in the revised construction contingency estimate for which Georgia Power may seek rate recovery as and when such costs are appropriately included in the base capital cost forecast. See Note 2 to the financial statements under "Georgia Power – Nuclear Construction" for additional information.
Interest Expense, Net of Amounts Capitalized
In 2017,2018, interest expense, net of amounts capitalized decreased $22 million, or 5.3%, compared to 2017 and increased $31 million, or 8.0%, compared to 2016 primarily due to changes in outstanding borrowings.
Other Income (Expense), Net
In 2018, other income (expense), net increased $11 million compared to the prior year primarily due to an increase in outstanding borrowings.
In 2016, interest expense, netAFUDC equity of amounts capitalized increased $25$29 million or 6.9%, compared to the prior year. The increase was primarilyresulting from a higher AFUDC rate due to a $34 million increase in interest due to additional long-termhigher equity ratio and lower short-term borrowings, from the FFB and higher interest rates on obligations for pollution control revenue bonds remarketed in 2015, partially offset by an increasea decrease of $4$21 million associated with revenues and expenses, net primarily from unregulated sales of products and services. In 2018, these revenues and expenses are included in AFUDC debt.other revenues and other operations and maintenance expenses, respectively, as a result of the adoption of ASC 606. See Note 1 to the financial statements for additional information regarding Georgia Power's adoption of ASC 606.
Other Income (Expense), Net
In 2017, other income (expense), net decreased $5increased $23 million compared to the prior year primarily due to a $10 million increase in donations and an $8$28 million decrease in AFUDC equity resulting from higher short-term borrowings, partially offset bythe non-service cost components of net periodic pension and other postretirement benefit costs, a $7 million increase in third party infrastructure services revenue, and a $6 million increase in wholesale operating fee revenue associated with contractual targets.targets, partially offset by a $10 million increase in charitable donations and an $8 million decrease in AFUDC equity resulting from higher short-term borrowings. See Notes 1 under "Recently Adopted Accounting Standards" and 11 to the financial statements for additional information on Georgia Power's net periodic pension and other postretirement benefit costs.
In 2016, other income (expense)Income Taxes
Income taxes decreased $616 million, or 74.2%, net decreased $23 millionin 2018 compared to the prior year primarily due to decreasesa lower federal income tax rate as a result of $8 millionthe Tax Reform Legislation and the reduction in customer contributions in aid of construction, $6 million in wholesale operating fee revenue associated with contractual targets,pre-tax earnings resulting from the estimated probable loss related to Plant Vogtle Units 3 and $4 million in gains on purchases of state tax credits.4.
Income Taxes
Income taxes increased $50 million, or 6.4%, in 2017 compared to the prior year primarily due to higher pre-tax earnings, partially offset by an adjustment related to the Tax Reform Legislation.
See FUTURE EARNINGS POTENTIAL – "Income Tax Matters – Federal Tax Reform Legislation" herein and Note 510 to the financial statements for additional information.
Income taxes increased $11 million, or 1.4%, in 2016 compared to the prior year primarily due to higher pre-tax earnings, partially offset by decreases in non-deductible book depreciation and increased state investment tax credits.
Dividends on Preferred and Preference Stock
Dividends on preferred and preference stock decreased $14 million, or 100.0%, in 2018 compared to 2017 and decreased $3 million, or 17.6%, in 2017 compared to the prior year2016. The decreases were due to the redemption in October 2017 of all outstanding shares of the Company'sGeorgia Power's preferred and preference stock. See Note 68 to the financial statements under "Outstanding Classes of Capital Stock"Stock – Georgia Power" for additional information.
Effects of Inflation
The CompanyGeorgia Power is subject to rate regulation that is generally based on the recovery of historical and projected costs. The effects of inflation can create an economic loss since the recovery of costs could be in dollars that have less purchasing power. Any adverse effect of inflation on the Company'sGeorgia Power's results of operations has not been substantial in recent years.

MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS (continued)
Georgia Power Company 2018 Annual Report

FUTURE EARNINGS POTENTIAL
General
The CompanyGeorgia Power operates as a vertically integrated utility providing electric service to retail customers within its traditional service territory located in the State of Georgia and to wholesale customers in the Southeast. Prices for electricity provided by the

MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS (continued)
Georgia Power Company 2017 Annual Report

Company to retail customers are set by the Georgia PSC under cost-based regulatory principles. Retail rates and earnings are reviewed and may be adjusted periodically within certain limitations. Prices for wholesale electricity sales, interconnecting transmission lines, and the exchange of electric power are regulated by the FERC. Retail rates and earnings are reviewed and may be adjusted periodically within certain limitations. See ACCOUNTING POLICIES – "Application of Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates – Utility Regulation" herein and Note 32 to the financial statements under "Retail Regulatory Matters""Georgia Power" for additional information about regulatory matters.
The results of operations for the past three years are not necessarily indicative of future earnings potential. The level of the Company'sGeorgia Power's future earnings depends on numerous factors that affect the opportunities, challenges, and risks of the Company'sGeorgia Power's business of providing electric service. These factors include the Company'sGeorgia Power's ability to maintain a constructive regulatory environment that continues to allow for the timely recovery of prudently-incurred costs during a time of increasing costs, continued customer growth, and limited projected demandthe weak pace of growth over the next several years.in electricity use per customer, especially in residential and commercial markets. Plant Vogtle Units 3 and 4 construction and rate recovery are also major factors. Future earnings will be driven primarily by customer growth. Earnings will also depend upon maintaining and growing sales, considering, among other things, the adoption and/or penetration rates of increasingly energy-efficient technologies, increasing volumes of electronic commerce transactions, and highermore multi-family home construction, all of which could contribute to a net reduction in customer usage. Earnings are subject to a variety of other factors. These factors include weather, competition, new energy contracts with other utilities, energy conservation practiced by customers, the use of alternative energy sources by customers, the price of electricity, the price elasticity of demand, and the rate of economic growth or decline in the Company'sGeorgia Power's service territory. Demand for electricity is primarily driven by the pace of economic growth that may be affected by changes in regional and global economic conditions, which may impact future earnings.
On December 22, 2017, the Tax Reform Legislation was signed into law and became effective on January 1, 2018, which, among other things, reduces the federal corporate income tax rate to 21% and changes rates of depreciation and the business interest deduction. See "Income Tax MattersFederal Tax Reform Legislation" and FINANCIAL CONDITION AND LIQUIDITY – "Credit Rating Risk" herein and Notes 3 and 5 to the financial statements under "Retail Regulatory Matters – Rate Plans" and "Current and Deferred Income Taxes," respectively, for additional information.
Environmental Matters
The Company'sGeorgia Power's operations are regulated by state and federal environmental agencies through a variety of laws and regulations governing air, water, land, and protection of other natural resources. The CompanyGeorgia Power maintains a comprehensive environmental compliance strategyand GHG strategies to assess upcoming requirements and compliance costs associated with these environmental laws and regulations. The costs, including capital expenditures, and operations and maintenance costs, and costs reflected in ARO liabilities, required to comply with environmental laws and regulations and to achieve stated goals may impact future electric generating unit retirement and replacement decisions, results of operations, cash flows, andand/or financial condition. ComplianceRelated costs may result from the installation of additional environmental controls, closure and monitoring of CCR facilities, unit retirements, and adding or changing fuel sources for certain existing units, as well as related upgrades to theGeorgia Power's transmission system.and distribution systems. A major portion of these compliance costs areis expected to be recovered through existing ratemaking provisions.retail rates. The ultimate impact of the environmental laws and regulations and the GHG goals discussed belowherein will depend on various factors, such as state adoption and implementation of requirements, the availability and cost of any deployed control technology, fuel prices, and the outcome of pending and/or future legal challenges.
New or revised environmental laws and regulations could affect many areas of the Company'sGeorgia Power's operations. The impact of any such changes cannot be determined at this time. Environmental compliance costs could affect earnings if such costs cannot continue to be fully recovered in rates on a timely basis. The Company'sGeorgia Power's Environmental Compliance Cost Recovery (ECCR) tariff allows for the recovery of capital and operations and maintenance costs related to environmental controls mandated by state and federal regulations. Further, increased costs that are recovered through regulated rates could contribute to reduced demand for electricity, which could negatively affect results of operations, cash flows, andand/or financial condition. Additionally, many commercial and industrial customers may also be affected by existing and future environmental requirements, which for some may have the potential to ultimately affect their demand for electricity.
Through 2017, the Company2018, Georgia Power has invested approximately $5.5$6.0 billion in environmental capital retrofit projects to comply with environmental requirements, with annual totals of approximately $0.5 billion, $0.3 billion, and $0.2 billion for 2018, 2017, and $0.3 billion for 2017, 2016, and 2015, respectively. Although the timing, requirements, and estimated costs could change as environmental laws and regulations are adopted or modified, as compliance plans are revised or updated, and as legal challenges to rules are initiated or completed, the Company'sGeorgia Power's current compliance strategy estimates capital expenditures of $1.2$0.7 billion from 20182019 through 2022,2023, with annual totals of approximately $0.5$0.2 billion, $0.1 billion, $0.1 billion, $0.2 billion, $0.2and $0.1 billion and $0.2 billion for 2018, 2019, 2020, 2021, 2022, and 2022,2023, respectively. These estimates do not include any potential compliance costs associated with thepending regulation of CO2 emissions from fossil fuel-fired electric generating units. See "Global Climate Issues" herein for additional information. The CompanyGeorgia Power also anticipates substantial expenditures associated with ash pond closure and ground water monitoring under the Disposal of Coal Combustion Residuals from Electric Utilities rule (CCR Rule),CCR Rule, which are reflected in the Company's ARO liabilities. See FINANCIAL
    Table of Contents                                Index to Financial Statements

MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS (continued)
Georgia Power Company 20172018 Annual Report

are reflected in Georgia Power's ARO liabilities. See FINANCIAL CONDITION AND LIQUIDITY – "Capital Requirements and Contractual Obligations" herein and Note 16 to the financial statements under "Asset Retirement Obligations and Other Costs of Removal" for additional information.
Environmental Laws and Regulations
Air Quality
The EPA has set National Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS) for six air pollutants (carbon monoxide, lead, nitrogen dioxide, ozone, particulate matter, and SO2), to protect and improve the nation's air quality, which it reviews and revises periodically. RevisionsFollowing a NAAQS revision, states are required to these standardsdevelop an EPA-approved plan to protect air quality. These state plans can require additional emission controls, improvements in control efficiency, or fuel changes which can result in increased compliance and operational costs. NAAQS requirements can also adversely affect the siting of new electric generating facilities. In 2015, the EPA publishedAll areas within Georgia Power's service territory have been designated as attainment for all NAAQS except for a more stringent eight-hour ozone NAAQS. The EPA plans to complete designations for this rule by no later than April 30, 2018 and intends to designate an eight-countyseven-county area within metropolitan Atlanta as nonattainment. No other areas within the Company's service territory have been or are anticipated to be designated nonattainment underthat is not in attainment with the 2015 ozone NAAQS. InNAAQS and the area surrounding Plant Hammond, which will not be designated attainment or nonattainment for the 2010 the EPA revised the NAAQS for SO2, establishing a new one-hour standard and is completing designations in multiple phases. The EPA has issued several rounds of area designations and no areas in the vicinity of Company-owned SO2 sources have been designated nonattainment under the 2010 one-hour SO2 NAAQS. However, final eight-hour ozone and SO2 one-hour designations for certain areas are still pending and, if otheruntil December 2020. If areas are designated as nonattainment in the future, increased compliance costs could result. See "Retail Regulatory Matters – Integrated Resource Plan" herein for information regarding Georgia Power's request to decertify and retire Plant Hammond.
In 2011, the EPA finalized the Cross-State Air Pollution Rule (CSAPR) and its NOX annual, NOX seasonal, and SO2 annual programs. CSAPR is an emissions trading program that addresses theto address impacts of the interstate transport of SO2 and NOX emissions from fossil fuel-fired power plants locatedelectric generating plants. CSAPR establishes emissions trading programs and budgets for certain states and allocates emissions allowances for sources in upwind states in the eastern half of the U.S. on air quality in downwindthose states. The Company has fossil fuel-fired generation subject to these requirements. In October 2016, the EPA published a final rule that revised the CSAPR seasonal NOX program, establishing more stringent ozone season NOX emissions budgets in Alabama. Georgia's seasonalozone season NOXemissions budget remainsremained unchanged. Increases in either future fossil fuel-fired generation or the availability or cost of CSAPR allowances could have a negative financial impact on results of operations for the Company.Georgia Power.
The EPA finalized regional haze regulations in 2005 and 2017. These regulations require states, tribal governments, and various federal agencies to develop and implement plans to reduce pollutants that impair visibility and demonstrate reasonable progress toward the goal of restoring natural visibility conditions in certain areas, including national parks and wilderness areas. States must submit a revised state implementation plan (SIP) to the EPA by July 31, 2021, demonstrating continued reasonable progress towards achieving visibility improvement goals. State implementation of reasonable progress could require further reductions in SO2 or NOX emissions, which could result in increased compliance costs.
In 2015, the EPA published a final rule requiring certain states (including Georgia and Alabama) to revise or remove the provisions of their SIPs regulating excess emissions at industrial facilities, including electric generating facilities, during periods of startup, shut-down, or malfunction (SSM). The state excess emission rules provide necessary operational flexibility to affected units during periods of SSM and, if removed, could affect unit availability and result in increased operations and maintenance costs for the Company. The EPA has not yet responded toapproved the regional progress SIP revisions proposed byfor the State of Georgia.
Water Quality
In 2014, the EPA finalized requirements under Section 316(b) of the Clean Water Act (CWA) to regulate cooling water intake structures at existing power plants and manufacturing facilities in order(CWIS) to minimize their effects on fish and other aquatic life.life at existing power plants (e.g. coal, natural gas, oil, and nuclear generating plants) and manufacturing facilities. The regulation requires plant-specific studies to determine applicable measuresCWIS changes to protect organisms that either get caught on the intake screens (impingement) or are drawn into the cooling system (entrainment). TheGeorgia Power is conducting these studies and currently anticipates applicable CWIS changes may include fish-friendly CWIS screens with fish return systems and minor additions of monitoring equipment at certain plants. However, the ultimate impact of this rule will depend on the outcome of these plant-specific studies, and any additional protective measures required to be incorporated into each plant's National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit based on site-specific factors.factors, and the outcome of any legal challenges.
In 2015, the EPA finalized the steam electric effluent limitations guidelines (ELG) rule (2015 ELG Rule) that set national standards for wastewater discharges from new and existing steam electric generating units.units generating greater than 50 MWs. The rule2015 ELG Rule prohibits effluent discharges of certain wastestreamswaste streams and imposes stringent arsenic, mercury, selenium, and nitrate/nitrite limits on scrubberflue gas desulfurization (scrubber) wastewater discharges. The revised technology-based limits and compliance dates maythe CCR Rule require extensive modificationschanges to existing ash and wastewater management systems or the installation and operation of new ash and wastewater management systems. Compliance with the 2015 ELG ruleRule is expected to require capital expenditures and increased operational costs primarily affecting the Company'sfor Georgia Power's coal-fired electric generation. Compliance applicability dates range from November 1, 2018 to December 31, 2023 with stateState environmental agencies incorporatingwill incorporate specific compliance applicability dates in the NPDES permitting process based on information provided for each ELG waste stream.stream no later than December 31, 2023. The EPA has committedis scheduled to issue a new rulemaking by December 2019 that could potentially revise the limitations and applicability dates of two of the waste streams regulated in the 2015 ELG rule.Rule. The EPA expectsimpact of any changes to finalize this rulemaking in 2020.

MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS (continued)
Georgia Power Company 2017 Annual Report

the new rule and the outcome of any legal challenges.
In 2015, the EPA and the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (Corps) jointly published a final rule that revised the regulatory definition of waters of the United States (WOTUS) for all CWA programs. The rule significantly expanded the scope of federal jurisdiction over waterbodies (such as rivers, streams, canals, and canals)wastewater treatment ponds), which could impact new generation projects and permitting and reporting requirements associated with the installation, expansion, and maintenance of transmission and distribution projects. On July 27, 2017, theThe EPA and the Corps proposedare expected to rescind the 2015 WOTUS rule. The WOTUS rule has been stayed by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit since late 2015, but on January 22, 2018, the U.S. Supreme Court determined that federal district courts have jurisdiction over the pending challenges to the rule. On February 6, 2018, the EPA and the Corps publishedpublish a final rule delaying implementationin 2019 to replace the 2015

MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS (continued)
Georgia Power Company 2018 Annual Report

WOTUS definition. The impact of any changes to the 2015 WOTUS rule to 2020.will depend on the content of this final rule and the outcome of any legal challenges.
Coal Combustion Residuals
In 2015, the EPA finalized non-hazardous solid waste regulations for the disposal of CCR, including coal ash and gypsum, in landfills and surface impoundments (CCR units)(ash ponds) at active generating power plants. In addition to the EPA's CCR Rule, the State of Georgia has also finalized its own regulations regarding the handling of CCR. The EPA's CCR Rule requires CCR unitslandfills and ash ponds to be evaluated against a set of performance criteria and potentially closed if minimum criteria are not met. Closure of existing CCR unitslandfills and ash ponds could require installation of equipment and infrastructure to manage CCR in accordance with the rule. The EPA has announced plans to reconsider certain portions of the CCR Rule by no later than December 2019, which could result in changes to deadlines and corrective action requirements.
The EPA's reconsideration of the CCR Rule is due in part to a legislative development that impacts the potential oversight role of state agencies. Under the Water Infrastructure Improvements for the Nation Act, which became law in 2016, states are allowed to establish permit programs for implementing the CCR Rule. The Georgia Department of Natural Resources has incorporated the requirements of the CCR Rule into its solid waste regulations, which established additional requirements for all of the Company's CCR units, and has requested that the EPA approve its state permitting program.
Based on cost estimates for closure and monitoring of landfills and ash ponds pursuant to the CCR Rule, the CompanyGeorgia Power recorded an update to the AROs for each CCR unit in 2015. As further analysis is performed and closure details are developed, the Company will continueGeorgia Power has continued to periodically update these cost estimates, as necessary.discussed further below.
The EPA published certain amendments to the CCR Rule, which became effective August 29, 2018. These amendments extend the date from April 2019 to October 31, 2020 to cease sending CCR and other waste streams to ash ponds that demonstrate compliance with all except two of the specified performance criteria. However, the Georgia Department of Natural Resources has not incorporated these amendments into its state CCR rule.
On August 21, 2018, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit issued a decision suggesting the EPA should regulate previously-excluded inactive ash ponds located at retired generation facilities and questioning both the ability of unlined ash ponds to continue operating no matter the performance criteria results and the classification of clay-lined landfills and ash ponds. These developments could impact the expected timing of Georgia Power's landfill and ash pond closure activities, but the extent of any impact will depend on the outcome of ongoing litigation, anticipated EPA rulemaking action to establish further guidance, and the outcome of any legal challenges.
In December 2018, Georgia Power recorded an increase of approximately $3.1 billion to its AROs related to the CCR Rule and the related state rule. During the second half of 2018, Georgia Power completed a strategic assessment related to its plans to close the ash ponds at all of its generating plants in compliance with the CCR Rule and the related state rule. This assessment included engineering and constructability studies related to design assumptions for ash pond closures and advanced engineering methods. The results indicated that additional closure costs will be required to close these ash ponds, primarily due to changes in closure strategies, the estimated amount of ash to be excavated, and additional water management requirements necessary to support closure strategies. These factors also impact the estimated timing of future cash outlays.
Georgia Power expects to periodically update its ARO cost estimates. Absent continued recovery of ARO costs through regulated rates, Georgia Power's results of operations, cash flows, and financial condition could be materially impacted. See "Retail Regulatory Matters – Integrated Resource Plan" and FINANCIAL CONDITION AND LIQUIDITY – "Capital Requirements and Contractual Obligations" herein and Note 16 to the financial statements under "Asset Retirement Obligations and Other Costs of Removal" for additional information regardinginformation.
The ultimate outcome of these matters cannot be determined at this time.
Nuclear Decommissioning
In December 2018, Georgia Power completed updated decommissioning cost site studies for Plant Hatch and Plant Vogtle Units 1 and 2. The estimated cost of decommissioning based on the Company's AROs asstudies resulted in an increase in Georgia Power's ARO liability of December 31, 2017.approximately $130 million. Georgia Power currently collects $4 million and $2 million annually in rates, which is used to fund external nuclear decommissioning trusts for Plant Hatch and Plant Vogtle Units 1 and 2, respectively. Georgia Power expects the Georgia PSC to review and adjust, if necessary, these amounts in the Georgia Power 2019 Base Rate Case. See Note 6 to the financial statements for additional information.
Environmental Remediation
The CompanyGeorgia Power must comply with environmental laws and regulations governing the handling and disposal of waste and releases of hazardous substances. Under these various laws and regulations, the CompanyGeorgia Power may also incur substantial costs to clean up affected sites. The CompanyGeorgia Power conducts studies to determine the extent of any required cleanup and has recognized the estimated costs to clean up known impacted sites in its financial statements. Amounts for cleanup and ongoing monitoring costs were not material for any year presented. The CompanyGeorgia Power has received authority from the Georgia PSC to recover approved environmental compliance costs through regulatory mechanisms. Georgia Power may be liable for some or all required cleanup costs for additional sites that may require environmental remediation. See Notes 1 andNote 3 to the financial statements under "Environmental Remediation Recovery" and "Environmental Matters – Environmental Remediation," respectively,Remediation" for additional information.

MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS (continued)
Georgia Power Company 2018 Annual Report

Global Climate Issues
In 2015,On August 31, 2018, the EPA published final rules limitinga proposed rule known as the Affordable Clean Energy (ACE) Rule, which is intended to replace a regulation enacted in 2015 known as the Clean Power Plan (CPP), that would limit CO2 emissions from new, modified, and reconstructedexisting fossil fuel-fired electric generating units and guidelines for states to develop plans to meet EPA-mandated CO2 emission performance standards for existing units (known as the Clean Power Plan or CPP). In February 2016,units. The CPP has been stayed by the U.S. Supreme Court granted a staysince 2016. The ACE Rule would require states to develop GHG unit-specific emission rate standards based on heat-rate efficiency improvements for existing fossil fuel-fired steam units. As proposed, combustion turbines, including natural gas combined cycles, are not affected sources. As of January 1, 2019, Georgia Power has ownership interests in 20 fossil fuel-fired steam units to which the CPP, whichproposed ACE Rule is applicable. The ultimate impact of this rule to Georgia Power is currently unknown and will remain in effect throughdepend on changes between the resolution of litigation inproposal and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia challenging the legality of the CPPfinal rule, subsequent state plan developments and requirements, and any review by the U.S. Supreme Court. associated legal challenges.
On March 28, 2017, the U.S. President signed an executive order directing agencies to review actions that potentially burden the development or use of domestically produced energy resources, including review of the CPP and other CO2 emissions rules. On October 10, 2017,December 20, 2018, the EPA published a proposed review of the Standards of Performance for Greenhouse Gas Emissions from New, Modified, and Reconstructed Stationary Sources: Electric Utility Generating Units final rule to repeal(2015 NSPS rule). The EPA's final 2015 NSPS rule set standards of performance for new, modified, and reconstructed electric utility generating units which included stationary combustion turbines and fossil-fired steam boilers. This proposal reduces the CPPstringency of the 2015 NSPS rule by not basing the new and reconstructed fossil-fired steam boiler and IGCC standards on December 28, 2017, published an advanced notice of proposed rulemaking regarding a CPP replacement rule.
In 2015, parties to the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change, including the United States, adopted the Paris Agreement, which established a non-binding universal framework for addressing greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions based on nationally determined contributions. On June 1, 2017, the U.S. President announced that the United States would withdraw from the Paris Agreementpartial carbon capture and begin renegotiating its terms.sequestration. The ultimate impact of any changes to this agreement orrule will depend on the content of the final rule and the outcome of any renegotiated agreement depends on its implementation by participating countries.legal challenges.
The EPA's GHG reporting rule requires annual reporting of GHG emissions expressed in terms of metric tons of CO2 equivalent emissions for a company's operational control of facilities. Based on ownership or financial control of facilities, the Company's

MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS (continued)
Georgia Power CompanyPower's 2017 Annual Report

2016 GHG emissions were approximately 3330 million metric tons of CO2 equivalent. The preliminary estimate of the Company's 2017Georgia Power's 2018 GHG emissions on the same basis is approximately 30 million metric tons of CO2 equivalent.
Through 2017, the Southern Company system has achieved an estimated GHG emission reduction of 36% since 2007. In April 2018, Southern Company established an intermediate goal of a 50% reduction in carbon emissions from 2007 levels by 2030 and a long-term goal of low- to no-carbon operations by 2050. To achieve these goals, the Southern Company system expects to continue growing its renewable energy portfolio, optimize technology advancements to modernize its transmission and distribution systems, increase the use of natural gas for generation, complete ongoing construction projects, including Georgia Power's interest in Plant Vogtle Units 3 and 4, invest in energy efficiency, and continue research and development efforts focused on technologies to lower GHG emissions. The Southern Company system's ability to achieve these goals also will be dependent on many external factors, including supportive national energy policies, low natural gas prices, and the development, deployment, and advancement of relevant energy technologies.
FERC Matters
The Company has authority fromOn May 10, 2018, AMEA and Cooperative Energy filed with the FERC to sell electricity at market-based rates. Since 2008, that authority, for certain balancing authority areas, has been conditioned on compliance with the requirements of an energy auction, which the FERC found to be tailored mitigation that addresses potential market power concerns. In accordance with FERC regulations governing such authority,a complaint against SCS and the traditional electric operating companies (including Georgia Power) claiming that the Company) and Southern Power filed a triennial market power analysiscurrent 11.25% base ROE used in 2014, which included continued reliance oncalculating the energy auction as tailored mitigation. In 2015, the FERC issued an order finding thatannual transmission revenue requirements of the traditional electric operating companies' (including the Company's)Georgia Power's) open access transmission tariff is unjust and Southern Power's existing tailored mitigation may not effectively mitigate the potential to exert market power in certain areas servedunreasonable as measured by the traditional electric operating companiesapplicable FERC standards. The complaint requested that the base ROE be set no higher than 8.65% and that the FERC order refunds for the difference in some adjacent areas. The FERC directedrevenue requirements that results from applying a just and reasonable ROE established in this proceeding upon determining the current ROE is unjust and unreasonable. On June 18, 2018, SCS and the traditional electric operating companies (including the Company) and Southern Power to show why market-based rate authority should not be revoked in these areas or to provide a mitigation plan to further address market power concerns. The traditional electric operating companies (including the Company) and Southern Power filed a request for rehearing andGeorgia Power) filed their response withchallenging the FERC in 2015.
In December 2016,adequacy of the traditional electric operating companies (includingshowing presented by the Company)complainants and Southern Power filed an amendment to their market-based rate tariff that proposed certain changes tooffering support for the energy auction, as well as several non-tariff changes.current ROE. On February 2, 2017,September 6, 2018, the FERC issued an order accepting all such changes subjectestablishing a refund effective date of May 10, 2018 in the event a refund is due and initiating an investigation and settlement procedures regarding the current base ROE. Through December 31, 2018, the estimated maximum potential refund is not expected to an additional conditionbe material to Georgia Power's results of cost-based price caps for certain sales outside of the energy auction, finding that all of these changes would provide adequate alternative mitigation for the traditional electric operating companies' (including the Company's) and Southern Power's potential to exert market power in certain areas served by the traditional electric operating companies (including the Company) and in some adjacent areas. On May 17, 2017, the FERC accepted the traditional electric operating companies' (including the Company's) and Southern Power's compliance filing accepting the terms of the order. While the FERC's February 2, 2017 order references the market power proceeding discussed above, it remains a separate, ongoing matter.
On October 25, 2017, the FERC issued an order in response to the traditional electric operating companies' (including the Company's) and Southern Power's June 29, 2017 triennial updated market power analysis. The FERC directed the traditional electric operating companies (including the Company) and Southern Power to show cause within 60 days why market-based rate authority should not be revoked in certain areas adjacent to the area presently under mitigation in accordance with the February 2, 2017 orderoperations or to provide a mitigation plan to further address market power concerns. On November 10, 2017, the traditional electric operating companies (including the Company) and Southern Power responded to the FERC and proposed to resolve matters by applying the alternative mitigation authorized by the February 2, 2017 order to the adjacent areas made the subject of the October 25, 2017 order.
cash flows. The ultimate outcome of these mattersthis matter cannot be determined at this time.
Retail Regulatory Matters
The Company'sGeorgia Power's revenues from regulated retail operations are collected through various rate mechanisms subject to the oversight of the Georgia PSC. The CompanyGeorgia Power currently recovers its costs from the regulated retail business through the 2013 ARP, which includes traditional base tariff rates, Demand-Side Management (DSM) tariffs, ECCR tariffs, and Municipal Franchise Fee (MFF) tariffs. Georgia Power is scheduled to file a base rate case by July 1, 2019, which may continue or modify these tariffs. In addition, financing costs on certified projectconstruction costs related to the construction of Plant Vogtle Units 3 and 4 are being collected through the NCCR tariff and fuel costs are collected through a separate fuel cost recovery tariff. See Note 32 to the financial statements under "Retail Regulatory Matters""Georgia Power – Rate Plans," " – Fuel Cost Recovery," and " – Nuclear Construction" for additional information.

MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS (continued)
Georgia Power Company 2018 Annual Report

On JanuaryNovember 16, 2018, the Georgia PSC approvedPower completed the Company's sale of its natural gas lateral pipeline serving Plant McDonough Units 4 through 6 to Southern Natural Gas, L.L.C. (SNG)SNG at net book value. Pursuant to this approval, legal transfer ofvalue, as approved by the lateral pipeline is expected to occur in the fourth quarter 2018 andGeorgia PSC on January 16, 2018. Georgia Power expects payment of $142 million is expectedfrom SNG to occur in the first quarter 2020. Completion of this sale is contingent on certain conditionsDuring the interim period, Georgia Power will receive a discounted shipping rate to be satisfied by SNG that include, among other things, expansion ofreflect the existing lateral pipeline.delayed consideration. Southern Company Gas, an affiliate of the Company,Georgia Power, owns a 50% equity interest in SNG. The ultimate outcome of this matter cannot be determined at this time; however, no material impact on the Company's financial statements is expected.
Rate Plans
Pursuant to the terms and conditions of a settlement agreement related to Southern Company's acquisition of Southern Company Gas approved by the Georgia PSC in April 2016, the 2013 ARP will continue in effect until December 31, 2019, and the CompanyGeorgia Power will be required to file its next base rate case by July 1, 2019. Furthermore, through December 31, 2019, the Company and Atlanta

MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS (continued)
Georgia Power Company 2017 Annual Report

Gas Light Company each will retain their respectiveits merger savings, net of transition costs, as defined in the settlement agreement; through December 31, 2022, such net merger savings applicable to each will be shared on a 60/40 basis with their respective customers; thereafter, all merger savings will be retained by customers. See Note 3 to the financial statements under "Retail Regulatory Matters – Rate Plans" for additional information regarding the 2013 ARP.
In accordance with the 2013 ARP, the Georgia PSC approved increases to tariffs effective January 1, 2016 as follows: (1) traditional base tariff rates by approximately $49 million; (2) ECCR tariff by approximately $75 million; (3) DSM tariffs by approximately $3 million; and (4) MFF tariff by approximately $13 million, for a total increase in base revenues of approximately $140 million. There were no changes to theseGeorgia Power's traditional base tariff rates, ECCR tariff, DSM tariffs, or MFF tariff in 2017.2017 or 2018.
Under the 2013 ARP, the Company'sGeorgia Power's retail ROE is set at 10.95% and earnings are evaluated against a retail ROE range of 10.00% to 12.00%. Two-thirds of any earnings above 12.00% will be directly refunded to customers, with the remaining one-third retained by the Company.Georgia Power. There will be no recovery of any earnings shortfall below 10.00% on an actual basis. In 2015, the Company's retail ROE was within the allowed retail ROE range. In 2016, the Company'sGeorgia Power's retail ROE exceeded 12.00%, and the Company will refundGeorgia Power refunded to retail customers approximately $44 million in 2018 approximately $40 million as approved by the Georgia PSC. On February 5, 2019, the Georgia PSC on January 16, 2018. In 2017,approved a settlement between Georgia Power and the Company'sstaff of the Georgia PSC under which Georgia Power's retail ROE for 2017 was within the allowedstipulated to exceed 12.00% and Georgia Power will reduce certain regulatory assets by approximately $4 million in lieu of providing refunds to retail customers. In 2018, Georgia Power's retail ROE range,exceeded 12.00%, and Georgia Power accrued approximately $100 million to refund to retail customers, subject to review and approval by the Georgia PSC.
On January 19,April 3, 2018, the Georgia PSC issued an order onapproved the Georgia Power Tax Reform Legislation, which was amended on February 16, 2018 (Tax Order). In accordance withSettlement Agreement. Pursuant to the Georgia Power Tax Order,Reform Settlement Agreement, to reflect the Company is required to submit its analysisfederal income tax rate reduction impact of the Tax Reform Legislation, Georgia Power will refund to customers a total of $330 million through bill credits. Georgia Power issued bill credits of approximately $130 million in 2018 and related recommendationswill issue bill credits of approximately $95 million in June 2019 and $105 million in February 2020. In addition, Georgia Power is deferring as a regulatory liability (i) the revenue equivalent of the tax expense reduction resulting from legislation lowering the Georgia state income tax rate from 6.00% to address5.75% in 2019 and (ii) the entire benefit of federal and state excess accumulated deferred income taxes, which is expected to total approximately $700 million at December 31, 2019. At December 31, 2018, the related regulatory liability balance totaled $610 million. The amortization of these regulatory liabilities is expected to be addressed in the Georgia Power 2019 Base Rate Case. If there is not a base rate case in 2019, customers will receive $185 million in annual bill credits beginning in 2020, with any additional federal and state income tax savings deferred as a regulatory liability, until Georgia Power's next base rate case.
To address some of the negative cash flow and credit quality impacts onof the Company's costTax Reform Legislation, the Georgia PSC also approved an increase in Georgia Power's retail equity ratio to the lower of service(i) Georgia Power's actual common equity weight in its capital structure or (ii) 55%, until the Georgia Power 2019 Base Rate Case. At December 31, 2018, Georgia Power's actual retail common equity ratio (on a 13-month average basis) was approximately 55%. Benefits from reduced federal income tax rates in excess of the amounts refunded to customers will be retained by Georgia Power to cover the carrying costs of the incremental equity in 2018 and annual revenue requirements by March 6, 2018. The ultimate outcome of this matter cannot be determined at this time.2019.
Integrated Resource Plan
See "Environmental Matters" herein for additional information regarding proposed and final EPA rules and regulations, including revisions to ELG for steam electric power plants and additional regulations of CCR and CO2.
In July 2016, the Georgia PSC approved the Company'sGeorgia Power's triennial Integrated Resource Plan (2016 IRP) including the decertification and retirement of Plant Mitchell Units 3, 4A, and 4B (217 MWs) and Plant Kraft Unit 1 (17 MWs), as well as the decertification of the Intercession City unit (143 MWs total capacity). In August 2016, the Plant Mitchell and Plant Kraft units were retired and the Company sold its 33% ownership interest in the Intercession City unit to Duke Energy Florida, LLC.
Additionally, the Georgia PSC approved the Company's environmental compliance strategy and related expenditures proposed in the 2016 IRP, including measures taken to comply with existing government-imposed environmental mandates, subject to limits on expenditures for Plant McIntosh Unit 1 and Plant Hammond Units 1 through 4.
The Georgia PSC approved the reclassification of the remaining net book value of Plant Mitchell Unit 3 and costs associated with materials and supplies remaining at the unit retirement date to a regulatory asset. Recovery of the unit's net book value will continue through December 31, 2019, as provided in the 2013 ARP. The timing of the recovery of the remaining balance of the unit's net book value as of December 31, 2019 and costs associated with materials and supplies remaining at the unit retirement date was deferred for consideration in the Company'sGeorgia Power 2019 base rate case.
The Georgia PSC also approved the Renewable Energy Development Initiative (REDI) to procure an additional 1,200 MWs of renewable resources primarily utilizing market-based prices established through a competitive bidding process with expected in-service dates between 2018 and 2021. Additionally, 200 MWs of self-build capacity for use by the Company was approved, as well as consideration for no more than 200 MWs of capacity as part of a renewable commercial and industrial program.
In 2017, the Company filed for and received certification for 510 MWs of REDI utility-scale PPAs for solar generation resources, which are expected to be in operation by the end of 2019. The Company also filed for and received approval to develop several solar generation projects to fulfill the approved self-build capacity.Base Rate Case.
In the 2016 IRP, the Georgia PSC also approved recovery of costs up to $99 million through June 30, 2019 to preserve nuclear generation as an option at a future generation site in Stewart County, Georgia. OnIn March 7, 2017, the Georgia PSC approved the Company'sGeorgia Power's decision to suspend work at the site due to changing economics, including lower load forecasts and fuel costs. The timing of recovery for costs incurred of approximately $50 million is expected to be determined by the Georgia PSC in a future rate case.
Fuel Cost Recovery
The Company has established fuel cost recovery rates approved by the Georgia PSC. In 2015, the Georgia PSC approved the Company's request to lower annual billings by approximately $350 million effective January 1, 2016. In May 2016, the Georgia PSC approved the Company's request to further lower annual billings under an interim fuel rider by approximately $313 million
    Table of Contents                                Index to Financial Statements

MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS (continued)
Georgia Power Company 20172018 Annual Report

of recovery for costs incurred of approximately $50 million is expected to be determined by the Georgia PSC in the Georgia Power 2019 Base Rate Case.
On January 31, 2019, Georgia Power filed its triennial IRP (2019 IRP). The filing includes a request to decertify and retire Plant Hammond Units 1 through 4 (840 MWs) and Plant McIntosh Unit 1 (142.5 MWs) upon approval of the 2019 IRP.
In the 2019 IRP, Georgia Power requested approval to reclassify the remaining net book value of Plant Hammond Units 1 through 4 (approximately $520 million at December 31, 2018) upon retirement to a regulatory asset to be amortized ratably over a period equal to the applicable unit's remaining useful life through 2035. For Plant McIntosh Unit 1, Georgia Power requested approval to reclassify the remaining net book value (approximately $40 million at December 31, 2018) upon retirement to a regulatory asset to be amortized over a three-year period to be determined in the Georgia Power 2019 Base Rate Case. Georgia Power also requested approval to reclassify any unusable material and supplies inventory balances remaining at the applicable unit's retirement date to a regulatory asset for recovery over a period to be determined in the Georgia Power 2019 Base Rate Case.
The 2019 IRP also includes a request to certify approximately 25 MWs of capacity at Plant Scherer Unit 3 for the retail jurisdiction beginning January 1, 2020, following the expiration of a wholesale PPA.
The 2019 IRP also includes details regarding ARO costs associated with ash pond and landfill closures and post-closure care. Georgia Power requested the timing and rate of recovery of these costs be determined by the Georgia PSC in the Georgia Power 2019 Base Rate Case. See "Environmental Matters – Environmental Laws and Regulations – Coal Combustion Residuals" and FINANCIAL CONDITION AND LIQUIDITY – "Capital Requirements and Contractual Obligations" herein and Note 6 to the financial statements for additional information regarding Georgia Power's AROs.
Georgia Power also requested approval to issue two capacity-based requests for proposals (RFP). If approved, the first capacity-based RFP will seek resources that can provide capacity beginning in 2022 or 2023 and the second capacity-based RFP will seek resources that can provide capacity beginning in 2026, 2027, or 2028. Additionally, the 2019 IRP includes a request to procure an additional 1,000 MWs of renewable resources through a competitive bidding process. Georgia Power also proposed to invest in a portfolio of up to 50 MWs of battery energy storage technologies.
A decision from the Georgia PSC on the 2019 IRP is expected in mid-2019.
The ultimate outcome of these matters cannot be determined at this time.
Fuel Cost Recovery
Georgia Power has established fuel cost recovery rates approved by the Georgia PSC. On August 16, 2018, the Georgia PSC approved the deferral of Georgia Power's next fuel case to no later than March 16, 2020, with new rates, if any, to be effective June 1, 2016, which expired on December 31, 2017. The2020. Georgia PSC will review the Company's cumulative over or under recovered fuel balance no later than September 1, 2018 and evaluate the need to file a fuel case unless the Company deems it necessary to file a fuel case at an earlier time. The CompanyPower continues to be allowed to adjust its fuel cost recovery rates under an interim fuel rider prior to the next fuel case if the under or over recovered fuel balance exceeds $200 million. At December 31, 2018, Georgia Power's under recovered fuel balance was $115 million.
The Company'sGeorgia Power's fuel cost recovery mechanism includes costs associated with a natural gas hedging program, as revised and approved by the Georgia PSC, allowing the use of an array of derivative instruments within a 48-month time horizon.
Fuel cost recovery revenues as recorded on the financial statements are adjusted for differences in actual recoverable fuel costs and amounts billed in current regulated rates. Accordingly, changes in the billing factor will not have a significant effect on the Company'sGeorgia Power's revenues or net income, but will affect operating cash flow.flows.
Storm Damage Recovery
The CompanyGeorgia Power is accruing $30 million annually through December 31, 2019, as provided in the 2013 ARP, for incremental operatingoperations and maintenance costs of damage from major storms to its transmission and distribution facilities. At December 31, 2018, the total balance in the regulatory asset related to storm damage was $416 million. During October 2018, Hurricane Michael caused significant damage to Georgia Power's transmission and distribution facilities. The incremental restoration costs related to this hurricane deferred in the regulatory asset for storm damage totaled approximately $115 million. Hurricanes Irma and Matthew also caused significant damage to the Company'sGeorgia Power's transmission and distribution facilities during September 2017 and October 2016, respectively. The incremental restoration costs related to these hurricanesHurricanes Irma and Matthew deferred in the regulatory asset for storm damage totaled approximately $260 million. At December 31, 2017, the total balance in the regulatory asset related to storm damage was $333$250 million. The rate of storm damage cost recovery is expected to be adjusted as part of the Company's next base rate case required to be filed by July 1, 2019. As a resultGeorgia Power 2019 Base Rate Case and further adjusted in future regulatory proceedings as necessary. The ultimate outcome of this regulatory treatment, costs related to storms are not expected to have a material impact on the Company's financial statements.matter cannot be determined at this time. See Note 12 to the financial statements under "Storm"Georgia Power – Storm Damage Recovery" for additional information regarding the Company'sGeorgia Power's storm damage reserve.
Nuclear Construction
Vogtle 3 and 4 Agreement and EPC Contractor Bankruptcy
In 2008, the Company, acting for itself and as agent for the Vogtle Owners, entered into the Vogtle 3 and 4 Agreement. Under the terms of the Vogtle 3 and 4 Agreement, the Vogtle Owners agreed to pay a purchase price subject to certain price escalations and adjustments, including fixed escalation amounts and index-based adjustments, as well as adjustments for change orders, and performance bonuses for early completion and unit performance. Under the Toshiba Guarantee, Toshiba guaranteed certain payment obligations of the EPC Contractor, including any liability of the EPC Contractor for abandonment of work. In the first quarter 2016, Westinghouse delivered to the Vogtle Owners a total of $920 million of letters of credit from financial institutions (Westinghouse Letters of Credit) to secure a portion of the EPC Contractor's potential obligations under the Vogtle 3 and 4 Agreement.
Subsequent to the EPC Contractor bankruptcy filing, a number of subcontractors to the EPC Contractor alleged non-payment by the EPC Contractor for amounts owed for work performed on Plant Vogtle Units 3 and 4. The Company, acting for itself and as agent for the Vogtle Owners, has taken actions to remove liens filed by these subcontractors through the posting of surety bonds. Related to such liens, certain subcontractors have filed, and additional subcontractors may file, actions against the EPC Contractor and the Vogtle Owners to preserve their payment rights with respect to such claims. All amounts associated with the removal of subcontractor liens and other EPC Contractor pre-petition accounts payable have been paid or accrued as of December 31, 2017.
On June 9, 2017, the Company and the other Vogtle Owners and Toshiba entered into the Guarantee Settlement Agreement. Pursuant to the Guarantee Settlement Agreement, Toshiba acknowledged the amount of its obligation was $3.68 billion (Guarantee Obligations), of which the Company's proportionate share was approximately $1.7 billion. The Guarantee Settlement Agreement provided for a schedule of payments for the Guarantee Obligations beginning in October 2017 and continuing through January 2021. Toshiba made the first three payments as scheduled. On December 8, 2017, the Company, the other Vogtle Owners, certain affiliates of the Municipal Electric Authority of Georgia (MEAG Power), and Toshiba entered into Amendment No. 1 to the Guarantee Settlement Agreement (Guarantee Settlement Agreement Amendment). The Guarantee Settlement Agreement Amendment provided that Toshiba's remaining payment obligations under the Guarantee Settlement Agreement were due and payable in full on December 15, 2017, which Toshiba satisfied on December 14, 2017. Pursuant to the Guarantee Settlement Agreement Amendment, Toshiba was deemed to be the owner of certain pre-petition bankruptcy claims of the Company, the other Vogtle Owners, and certain affiliates of MEAG Power against Westinghouse, and the Company and the other Vogtle Owners surrendered the Westinghouse Letters of Credit.
Additionally, on June 9, 2017, the Company, acting for itself and as agent for the other Vogtle Owners, and the EPC Contractor entered into the Vogtle Services Agreement, which was amended and restated on July 20, 2017. On July 20, 2017, the bankruptcy court approved the EPC Contractor's motion seeking authorization to (i) enter into the Vogtle Services Agreement, (ii) assume and
    Table of Contents                                Index to Financial Statements

MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS (continued)
Georgia Power Company 20172018 Annual Report

assignNuclear Construction
In 2009, the Georgia PSC certified construction of Plant Vogtle Units 3 and 4. Georgia Power holds a 45.7% ownership interest in Plant Vogtle Units 3 and 4. In 2012, the NRC issued the related combined construction and operating licenses, which allowed full construction of the two AP1000 nuclear units (with electric generating capacity of approximately 1,100 MWs each) and related facilities to thebegin. Until March 2017, construction on Plant Vogtle Owners certain project-related contracts, (iii) join the Vogtle Owners as counterparties to certain assumed project-related contracts, and (iv) reject the VogtleUnits 3 and 4 Agreement. The Vogtle Services Agreement, and the EPC Contractor's rejection ofcontinued under the Vogtle 3 and 4 Agreement, became effective upon approval bywhich was a substantially fixed price agreement. In March 2017, the DOEEPC Contractor filed for bankruptcy protection under Chapter 11 of the U.S. Bankruptcy Code.
In connection with the EPC Contractor's bankruptcy filing, Georgia Power, acting for itself and as agent for the Vogtle Owners, entered into the Interim Assessment Agreement with the EPC Contractor to allow construction to continue. The Interim Assessment Agreement expired in July 2017 when Georgia Power, acting for itself and as agent for the other Vogtle Owners, and the EPC Contractor entered into the Vogtle Services Agreement. Under the Vogtle Services Agreement, Westinghouse provides facility design and engineering services, procurement and technical support, and staff augmentation on July 27, 2017.a time and materials cost basis. The Vogtle Services Agreement provides that it will continue until the start-up and testing of Plant Vogtle Units 3 and 4 are complete and electricity is generated and sold from both units. The Vogtle Services Agreement is terminable by the Vogtle Owners upon 30 days' written notice.
EffectiveIn October 23, 2017, the Company,Georgia Power, acting for itself and as agent for the other Vogtle Owners, entered into a construction completion agreement withexecuted the Bechtel whereby Bechtel will serve as the primary contractor for the remaining construction activities for Plant Vogtle Units 3 and 4 (Bechtel Agreement). Facility design and engineering remains the responsibility of the EPC Contractor under the Vogtle Services Agreement. The Bechtel Agreement, is a cost reimbursable plus fee arrangement, whereby Bechtel will beis reimbursed for actual costs plus a base fee and an at-risk fee, which is subject to adjustment based on Bechtel's performance against cost and schedule targets. Each Vogtle Owner is severally (not jointly) liable for its proportionate share, based on its ownership interest, of all amounts owed to Bechtel under the Bechtel Agreement. The Vogtle Owners may terminate the Bechtel Agreement at any time for their convenience, provided that the Vogtle Owners will be required to pay amounts related to work performed prior to the termination (including the applicable portion of the base fee), certain termination-related costs, and, at certain stages of the work, the applicable portion of the at-risk fee. Bechtel may terminate the Bechtel Agreement under certain circumstances, including certain Vogtle Owner suspensions of work, certain breaches of the Bechtel Agreement by the Vogtle Owners, Vogtle Owner insolvency, and certain other events. Pursuant to the Loan Guarantee Agreement between the CompanyGeorgia Power and the DOE, the CompanyGeorgia Power is required to obtain the DOE's approval of the Bechtel Agreement prior to obtaining any further advances under the Loan Guarantee Agreement.
OnCost and Schedule
Georgia Power's approximate proportionate share of the remaining estimated capital cost to complete Plant Vogtle Units 3 and 4 by the expected in-service dates of November 2,2021 and November 2022, respectively, is as follows:
 (in billions)
Base project capital cost forecast(a)(b)
$8.0
Construction contingency estimate0.4
Total project capital cost forecast(a)(b)
8.4
Net investment as of December 31, 2018(b)
(4.6)
Remaining estimate to complete(a)
$3.8
(a)Excludes financing costs expected to be capitalized through AFUDC of approximately $315 million.
(b)Net of $1.7 billion received from Toshiba under the Guarantee Settlement Agreement and approximately $188 million in related Customer Refunds.
Georgia Power estimates that its financing costs for construction of Plant Vogtle Units 3 and 4 will total approximately $3.1 billion, of which $1.9 billion had been incurred through December 31, 2018.
As construction continues, challenges with management of contractors, subcontractors, and vendors; labor productivity, availability, and/or cost escalation; procurement, fabrication, delivery, assembly, and/or installation and testing, including any required engineering changes, of plant systems, structures, and components (some of which are based on new technology that only recently began initial operation in the global nuclear industry at this scale); or other issues could arise and change the projected schedule and estimated cost. Monthly construction production targets required to maintain the current project schedule will continue to increase significantly throughout 2019. To meet these increasing monthly targets, existing craft construction productivity must improve and additional craft laborers must be retained and deployed.
Georgia Power and Southern Nuclear believe it is a leading practice in connection with a construction project of this size and complexity to periodically validate recent construction progress in comparison to the projected schedule and to verify and update quantities of commodities remaining to install, labor productivity, and forecasted staffing needs. This verification process, led by

MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS (continued)
Georgia Power Company 2018 Annual Report

Southern Nuclear, was underway as of December 31, 2018 and is expected to be completed during the second quarter 2019. Georgia Power currently does not anticipate any material changes to the total estimated project capital cost forecast for Plant Vogtle Units 3 and 4 or the expected in-service dates of November 2021 and November 2022, respectively, resulting from this verification process. However, the ultimate impact on cost and schedule, if any, will not be known until the verification process is completed. Georgia Power is required to report the results and any project impacts to the Georgia PSC by May 15, 2019.
There have been technical and procedural challenges to the construction and licensing of Plant Vogtle Units 3 and 4 at the federal and state level and additional challenges may arise. Processes are in place that are designed to assure compliance with the requirements specified in the Westinghouse Design Control Document and the combined construction and operating licenses, including inspections by Southern Nuclear and the NRC that occur throughout construction. As a result of such compliance processes, certain license amendment requests have been filed and approved or are pending before the NRC. Various design and other licensing-based compliance matters, including the timely resolution of ITAAC and the related approvals by the NRC, may arise, which may result in additional license amendments or require other resolution. If any license amendment requests or other licensing-based compliance issues are not resolved in a timely manner, there may be delays in the project schedule that could result in increased costs.
The ultimate outcome of these matters cannot be determined at this time. However, any extension of the project schedule is currently estimated to result in additional base capital costs of approximately $50 million per month, based on Georgia Power's ownership interests, and AFUDC of approximately $12 million per month. While Georgia Power is not precluded from seeking recovery of any future capital cost forecast increase, management will ultimately determine whether or not to seek recovery. Any further changes to the capital cost forecast that are not expected to be recoverable through regulated rates will be required to be charged to income and such charges could be material.
Joint Owner Contracts
In November 2017, the Vogtle Owners entered into an amendment to their joint ownership agreements for Plant Vogtle Units 3 and 4 (as amended, Vogtle Joint Ownership Agreements) to provide for, among other conditions, additional Vogtle Owner approval requirements. PursuantEffective August 31, 2018, the Vogtle Owners further amended the joint ownership agreements to clarify and provide procedures for certain provisions of the joint ownership agreements related to adverse events that require the vote of the holders of at least 90% of the ownership interests in Plant Vogtle Units 3 and 4 to continue construction (as amended, and together with the November 2017 amendment, the Vogtle Joint Ownership Agreements). The Vogtle Joint Ownership Agreements also confirm that the Vogtle Owners' sole recourse against Georgia Power or Southern Nuclear for any action or inaction in connection with their performance as agent for the Vogtle Owners is limited to removal of Georgia Power and/or Southern Nuclear as agent, except in cases of willful misconduct.
As a result of the increase in the total project capital cost forecast and Georgia Power's decision not to seek rate recovery of the increase in the base capital costs as described below, the holders of at least 90% of the ownership interests in Plant Vogtle Units 3 and 4 were required to vote to continue construction. On September 26, 2018, the Vogtle Owners unanimously voted to continue construction of Plant Vogtle Units 3 and 4.
Amendments to the Vogtle Joint Ownership Agreements
In connection with the vote to continue construction, Georgia Power entered into (i) the Vogtle Owner Term Sheet with the other Vogtle Owners and MEAG's wholly-owned subsidiaries MEAG SPVJ, MEAG Power SPVM, LLC (MEAG SPVM), and MEAG Power SPVP, LLC (MEAG SPVP) to take certain actions which partially mitigate potential financial exposure for the other Vogtle Owners, including additional amendments to the Vogtle Joint Ownership Agreements and the purchase of PTCs from the other Vogtle Owners, and (ii) the MEAG Term Sheet with MEAG and MEAG SPVJ to provide funding with respect to MEAG SPVJ's ownership interest in Plant Vogtle Units 3 and 4 (Project J) under certain circumstances. On January 14, 2019, Georgia Power, MEAG, and MEAG SPVJ entered into an agreement to implement the provisions of the MEAG Term Sheet (MEAG Funding Agreement). On February 18, 2019, Georgia Power, the other Vogtle Owners, and MEAG's wholly-owned subsidiaries MEAG SPVJ, MEAG SPVM, and MEAG SPVP entered into certain amendments to the Vogtle Joint Ownership Agreements to implement the provisions of the Vogtle Owner Term Sheet (Global Amendments).
Pursuant to the Global Amendments, and consistent with the Vogtle Owner Term Sheet, the Vogtle Joint Ownership Agreements were modified as follows: (i) each Vogtle Owner must pay its proportionate share of qualifying construction costs for Plant Vogtle Units 3 and 4 based on its ownership percentage up to the estimated cost at completion (EAC) for Plant Vogtle Units 3 and 4 which formed the basis of Georgia Power's forecast of $8.4 billion in the nineteenth VCM plus $800 million; (ii) Georgia Power will be responsible for 55.7% of actual qualifying construction costs between $800 million and $1.6 billion over the EAC in the nineteenth VCM (resulting in $80 million of potential additional costs to Georgia Power), with the remaining Vogtle Owners responsible for 44.3% of such costs pro rata in accordance with their respective ownership interests; and (iii) Georgia Power will be responsible for 65.7% of qualifying construction costs between $1.6 billion and $2.1 billion over the EAC in the nineteenth

MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS (continued)
Georgia Power Company 2018 Annual Report

VCM (resulting in a further $100 million of potential additional costs to Georgia Power), with the remaining Vogtle Owners responsible for 34.3% of such costs pro rata in accordance with their respective ownership interests.
If the EAC is revised and exceeds the EAC in the nineteenth VCM by more than $2.1 billion, each of the other Vogtle Owners will have a one-time option at the time the project budget forecast is so revised to tender a portion of its ownership interest to Georgia Power in exchange for Georgia Power's agreement to pay 100% of such Vogtle Owner's remaining share of total construction costs in excess of the EAC in the nineteenth VCM plus $2.1 billion. In this event, Georgia Power will have the option of cancelling the project in lieu of purchasing a portion of the ownership interest of any other Vogtle Owner. If Georgia Power accepts the offer to purchase a portion of another Vogtle Owner's ownership interest in Plant Vogtle Units 3 and 4, the ownership interest(s) to be conveyed from the tendering Vogtle Owner(s) to Georgia Power will be calculated based on the proportion of the cumulative amount of construction costs paid by each such tendering Vogtle Owner(s) and by Georgia Power as of the COD of Plant Vogtle Unit 4. For purposes of this calculation, payments made by Georgia Power on behalf of another Vogtle Owner in accordance with the second and third items described in the paragraph above will be treated as payments made by the applicable Vogtle Owner.
In the event the actual costs of construction at completion of a Unit are less than the EAC reflected in the nineteenth VCM report and such Unit is placed in service in accordance with the schedule projected in the nineteenth VCM report (i.e., Plant Vogtle Unit 3 is placed in service by November 2021 or Plant Vogtle Unit 4 is placed in service by November 2022), Georgia Power will be entitled to 60.7% of the cost savings with respect to the relevant Unit and the remaining Vogtle Owners will be entitled to 39.3% of such savings on a pro rata basis in accordance with their respective ownership interests.
For purposes of the foregoing provisions, qualifying construction costs will not include costs (i) resulting from force majeure events, including governmental actions or inactions (or significant delays associated with issuance of such actions) that affect the licensing, completion, start-up, operations, or financing of Plant Vogtle Units 3 and 4, administrative proceedings or litigation regarding ITAAC or other regulatory challenges to commencement of operation of Plant Vogtle Units 3 and 4, and changes in laws or regulations governing Plant Vogtle Units 3 and 4, (ii) legal fees and legal expenses incurred due to litigation with contractors or subcontractors that are not subsidiaries or affiliates of Southern Company, and (iii) additional costs caused by requests from the Vogtle Owners other than Georgia Power, except for the exercise of a right to vote granted under the Vogtle Joint Ownership Agreements, that increase costs by $100,000 or more.
Pursuant to the Global Amendments, and consistent with the Vogtle Owner Term Sheet, the provisions of the Vogtle Joint Ownership Agreements requiring that Vogtle Owners holding 90% of the ownership interests in Plant Vogtle Units 3 and 4 vote to continue construction following certain adverse events (Project Adverse Events) were modified. Pursuant to the Global Amendments, the holders of at least 90% of the ownership interests in Plant Vogtle Units 3 and 4 must vote to continue construction if certain adverse eventsProject Adverse Events occur, includingincluding: (i) the bankruptcy of Toshiba; (ii) the termination or rejection in bankruptcy of certain agreements, including the Vogtle Services Agreement, the Bechtel Agreement, or the Bechtel Agreement;agency agreement with Southern Nuclear; (iii) Georgia Power publicly announces its intention not to submit for rate recovery any portion of its investment in Plant Vogtle Units 3 and 4 or the Georgia PSC or the Company determines that any of the Company'sGeorgia Power's costs relating to the construction of Plant Vogtle Units 3 and 4 will not be recovered in retail rates, because suchexcluding any additional amounts paid by Georgia Power on behalf of the other Vogtle Owners pursuant to the Global Amendments described above and the first 6% of costs during any six-month VCM reporting period that are deemed unreasonabledisallowed by the Georgia PSC for recovery, or imprudent; orfor which Georgia Power elects not to seek cost recovery, through retail rates; and (iv) an increase in the construction budget contained in the seventeenth VCM report of more than $1 billion orincremental extension of one year or more over the most recently approved schedule. Under the Global Amendments, Georgia Power may cancel the project schedule containedat any time in the seventeenth VCM report of more than one year. its sole discretion.
In addition, pursuant to the Vogtle Joint Ownership Agreements, the required approval of holders of ownership interests in Plant Vogtle Units 3 and 4 is at least (i) 90% for a change of the primary construction contractor and (ii) 67% for material amendments to the Vogtle Services Agreement or agreements with Southern Nuclear or the primary construction contractor, including the Bechtel Agreement.
The Global Amendments provide that if the holders of at least 90% of the ownership interests fail to vote in favor of continuing the project following any future Project Adverse Event, work on Plant Vogtle Units 3 and 4 will continue for a period of 30 days if the holders of more than 50% of the ownership interests vote in favor of continuing construction (Majority Voting Owners). In such a case, the Vogtle Owners (i) have agreed to negotiate in good faith towards the resumption of the project, (ii) if no agreement is reached during such 30-day period, the project will be cancelled, and (iii) in the event of such a cancellation, the Majority Voting Owners will be obligated to reimburse any other Vogtle Owner for the incremental costs it incurred during such 30-day negotiation period.

MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS (continued)
Georgia Power Company 2018 Annual Report

Purchase of PTCs During Commercial Operation
Pursuant to the Global Amendments, and consistent with the Vogtle Owner Term Sheet, Georgia Power has agreed to purchase additional PTCs from OPC, Dalton, MEAG SPVM, MEAG SPVP, and MEAG SPVJ (to the extent any MEAG SPVJ PTC rights remain after any purchases required under the MEAG Funding Agreement as described below) at varying purchase prices dependent upon the actual cost to complete construction of Plant Vogtle Units 3 and 4 as compared to the EAC reflected in the nineteenth VCM report. The purchases are at the option of the applicable Vogtle Owner.
Potential Funding to MEAG Project J
Pursuant to the MEAG Funding Agreement, and consistent with the MEAG Term Sheet, if MEAG SPVJ is unable to make its payments due under the Vogtle Joint Ownership Agreements also confirmsolely as a result of the occurrence of one of the following situations that materially impedes access to capital markets for MEAG for Project J: (i) the conduct of JEA or the City of Jacksonville, such as JEA's legal challenges of its obligations under a PPA with MEAG (PPA-J), or (ii) PPA-J is declared void by a court of competent jurisdiction or rejected by JEA under the applicable provisions of the U.S. Bankruptcy Code (each of (i) and (ii), a JEA Default), at MEAG's request, Georgia Power will purchase from MEAG SPVJ the rights to PTCs attributable to MEAG SPVJ's share of Plant Vogtle Units 3 and 4 (approximately 206 MWs) within 30 days of such request at varying prices dependent upon the stage of construction of Plant Vogtle Units 3 and 4. The aggregate purchase price of the PTCs, together with any advances made as described in the next paragraph, shall not exceed $300 million.
At the option of MEAG, as an alternative or supplement to Georgia Power's purchase of PTCs as described above, Georgia Power has agreed to provide up to $250 million in funding to MEAG for Project J in the form of advances (either advances under the Vogtle Owners' sole recourse againstJoint Ownership Agreements or the Company or Southern Nuclearpurchase of MEAG Project J bonds, at the discretion of Georgia Power), subject to any required approvals of the Georgia PSC and the DOE.
In the event MEAG SPVJ certifies to Georgia Power that it is unable to fund its obligations under the Vogtle Joint Ownership Agreements as a result of a JEA Default and Georgia Power becomes obligated to provide funding as described above, MEAG is required to (i) assign to Georgia Power its right to vote on any future Project Adverse Event and (ii) diligently pursue JEA for its breach of PPA-J. In addition, Georgia Power agreed that it will not sue MEAG for any action or inaction in connectionamounts due from MEAG SPVJ under MEAG's guarantee of MEAG SPVJ's obligations so long as MEAG SPVJ complies with their performancethe terms of the MEAG Funding Agreement as agent forto its payment obligations and the other non-payment provisions of the Vogtle Owners is limited to removalJoint Ownership Agreements.
Under the terms of the Company and/MEAG Funding Agreement, Georgia Power may cancel the project in lieu of providing funding in the form of advances or Southern Nuclear as agent, except in casesPTC purchases.
The ultimate outcome of willful misconduct.these matters cannot be determined at this time.
Regulatory Matters
In 2009, the Georgia PSC voted to certify construction of Plant Vogtle Units 3 and 4 with a certified capital cost of $4.418 billion. In addition, in 2009 the Georgia PSC approved inclusion of the Plant Vogtle Units 3 and 4 related CWIP accounts in rate base, and the State of Georgia enacted the Georgia Nuclear Energy Financing Act, which allows the CompanyGeorgia Power to recover financing costs for nuclear construction projects certified by the Georgia PSC.Plant Vogtle Units 3 and 4. Financing costs are recovered on all applicable certified costs through annual adjustments to the NCCR tariff up to the certified capital cost of $4.418 billion. As ofAt December 31, 2017, the Company2018, Georgia Power had recovered approximately $1.6$1.9 billion of financing costs. Financing costs related to capital costs above $4.418 billion will be recovered through AFUDC; however, Georgia Power will not record AFUDC related to any capital costs in excess of the total deemed reasonable by the Georgia PSC (currently $7.3 billion) and not requested for rate recovery. On January 30,December 18, 2018, the Company filedGeorgia PSC approved Georgia Power's request to decreaseincrease the NCCR tariff by approximately $50$88 million annually, effective AprilJanuary 1, 2018, pending 2019.
Georgia PSC approval. The decrease reflects the payments received under the Guarantee Settlement Agreement, the Customer Refunds ordered by the Georgia PSC aggregating approximately $188 million, and the estimated effects of Tax Reform Legislation. The Customer Refunds were recognized as a regulatory liability as of December 31, 2017 and will be paid in three installments of $25 to each retail customer no later than the third quarter 2018.
The CompanyPower is required to file semi-annual VCM reports with the Georgia PSC by February 28 and August 31 of each year. In October 2013, in connection with the eighth VCM report, the Georgia PSC approved a stipulation (2013 Stipulation) between the CompanyGeorgia Power and the staff of the Georgia PSC to waive the requirement to amend the Plant Vogtle Units 3 and 4 certificate in accordance with the 2009 certification order until the completion of Plant Vogtle Unit 3, or earlier if deemed appropriate by the Georgia PSC and the Company.Georgia Power.
On December 20,In 2016, the Georgia PSC voted to approve a settlement agreement (Vogtle Cost Settlement Agreement) resolving certain prudency matters in connection with the fifteenth VCM report. OnIn December 21, 2017, the Georgia PSC voted to approve

MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS (continued)
Georgia Power Company 2017 Annual Report

(and (and issued its related order on January 11, 2018) certain recommendations made by the Company in theGeorgia Power's seventeenth VCM report, which included a recommendation to continue construction with Southern Nuclear as project manager and modifyingBechtel serving as the primary construction contractor, and modified the Vogtle Cost Settlement Agreement. The Vogtle Cost Settlement Agreement, as modified by the January 11, 2018 order, resolved the following regulatory matters related to Plant Vogtle Units 3 and 4: (i) none of the $3.3 billion of costs incurred

MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS (continued)
Georgia Power Company 2018 Annual Report

through December 31, 2015 and reflected in the fourteenth VCM report should be disallowed from rate base on the basis of imprudence; (ii) the Contractor Settlement Agreement was reasonable and prudent and none of the amounts paid pursuant to the Contractor Settlement Agreement should be disallowed from rate base on the basis of imprudence; (iii) (a) capital costs incurred up to $5.680$5.68 billion would be presumed to be reasonable and prudent with the burden of proof on any party challenging such costs, (b) the CompanyGeorgia Power would have the burden to show that any capital costs above $5.680$5.68 billion were prudent, and (c) a revised capital cost forecast of $7.3 billion (after reflecting the impact of payments received under the Guarantee Settlement Agreement and related Customer Refunds) iswas found reasonable; (iv) construction of Plant Vogtle Units 3 and 4 should be completed, with Southern Nuclear serving as project manager and Bechtel as primary contractor; (v) approved and deemed reasonable the Company'sGeorgia Power's revised schedule placing Plant Vogtle Units 3 and 4 in service in November 2021 and November 2022, respectively; (vi) confirmed that the revised cost forecast does not represent a cost cap and that prudence decisions on cost recovery will be made at a later date, consistent with applicable Georgia law; (vii) reduced the ROE used to calculate the NCCR tariff (a) from 10.95% (the ROE rate setting point authorized by the Georgia PSC in the 2013 ARP) to 10.00% effective January 1, 2016, (b) from 10.00% to 8.30%, effective January 1, 2020, and (c) from 8.30% to 5.30%, effective January 1, 2021 (provided that the ROE in no case will be less than the Company'sGeorgia Power's average cost of long-term debt); (viii) reduced the ROE used for AFUDC equity for Plant Vogtle Units 3 and 4 from 10.00% to the Company'sGeorgia Power's average cost of long-term debt, effective January 1, 2018; and (ix) agreed that upon Unit 3 reaching commercial operation, retail base rates would be adjusted to include carrying costs on those capital costs deemed prudent in the Vogtle Cost Settlement Agreement. The January 11, 2018 order also stated that if Plant Vogtle Units 3 and 4 are not commercially operational by June 1, 2021 and June 1, 2022, respectively, the ROE used to calculate the NCCR tariff will be further reduced by 10 basis points each month (but not lower than the Company'sGeorgia Power's average cost of long-term debt) until the respective unitUnit is commercially operational. The ROE reductions negatively impacted earnings by approximately $100 million, $25 million, and $20 million in 2018, 2017, and 2016, and $25 million in 2017respectively, and are estimated to have negative earnings impacts of approximately $120$75 million in 20182019 and an aggregate of $585approximately $615 million from 20192020 to 2022.
In its January 11, 2018 order, the Georgia PSC also stated if other certain conditions change and assumptions upon which the Company'sGeorgia Power's seventeenth VCM report are based do not materialize, both the Company and the Georgia PSC reservereserved the right to reconsider the decision to continue construction.
On February 12, 2018, Georgia Interfaith Power & Light, Inc. (GIPL) and Partnership for Southern Equity, Inc. (PSE) filed a petition appealing the Georgia PSC's January 11, 2018 order with the Fulton County Superior Court. The CompanyOn March 8, 2018, Georgia Watch filed a similar appeal to the Fulton County Superior Court for judicial review of the Georgia PSC's decision and denial of Georgia Watch's motion for reconsideration. On December 21, 2018, the Fulton County Superior Court granted Georgia Power's motion to dismiss the two appeals. On January 9, 2019, GIPL, PSE, and Georgia Watch filed an appeal of this decision with the Georgia Court of Appeals. Georgia Power believes the appeal has no merit; however, an adverse outcome in thisthe appeal combined with subsequent adverse action by the Georgia PSC could have a material impact on the Company'sGeorgia Power's results of operations, financial condition, and liquidity.
The IRS allocated PTCsIn preparation for its nineteenth VCM filing, Georgia Power requested Southern Nuclear to eachperform a full cost reforecast for the project. This reforecast, performed prior to the nineteenth VCM filing, resulted in a $0.7 billion increase to the base capital cost forecast reported in the second quarter 2018. This base cost increase primarily resulted from changed assumptions related to the finalization of contract scopes and management responsibilities for Bechtel and over 60 subcontractors, labor productivity rates, and craft labor incentives, as well as the related levels of project management, oversight, and support, including field supervision and engineering support.
Although Georgia Power believes these incremental costs are reasonable and necessary to complete the project and the Georgia PSC's order in the seventeenth VCM proceeding specifically states that the construction of Plant Vogtle Units 3 and 4 which originally requiredis not subject to a cost cap, Georgia Power did not seek rate recovery for these cost increases included in the applicable unit to be placedcurrent base capital cost forecast (or any related financing costs) in service before 2021. Under the Bipartisan Budget Act of 2018, Plant Vogtle Units 3 and 4 continue to qualify for PTCs. The nominal value of the Company's portion of the PTCs is approximately $500 million per unit.
nineteenth VCM report. In its January 11, 2018 order,connection with future VCM filings, Georgia Power may request the Georgia PSC also approved $542 millionto evaluate costs currently included in the construction contingency estimate for rate recovery as and when they are appropriately included in the base capital cost forecast. After considering the significant level of capitaluncertainty that exists regarding the future recoverability of costs incurred duringincluded in the seventeenth VCM reporting period (January 1, 2017construction contingency estimate since the ultimate outcome of these matters is subject to June 30, 2017). Thethe outcome of future assessments by management, as well as Georgia PSC has approved seventeen VCM reports coveringdecisions in these future regulatory proceedings, Georgia Power recorded a total pre-tax charge to income of $1.1 billion ($0.8 billion after tax) in the periods through June 30, 2017, includingsecond quarter 2018, which includes the total increase in the base capital cost forecast and construction capital costs incurred through that date of $4.4 billion. The Company expects to filecontingency estimate.
On August 31, 2018, Georgia Power filed its eighteenthnineteenth VCM report on February 28, 2018 requestingwith the Georgia PSC, which requested approval of approximately $450$578 million of construction capital costs (before payments received under the Guarantee Settlement Agreement and the Customer Refunds) incurred from JulyJanuary 1, 20172018 through December 31, 2017. The Company's CWIP balance for Plant Vogtle Units 3 and 4 was approximately $4.8 billion asJune 30, 2018. On February 19, 2019, the Georgia PSC approved the nineteenth VCM, but deferred approval of December 31, 2017, or $3.3 billion net$51.6 million of payments received under the Guarantee Settlement Agreement and the Customer Refunds.
The ultimate outcomeexpenditures related to Georgia Power's portion of these matters cannot be determined at this time.
    Table of Contents                                Index to Financial Statements

MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS (continued)
Georgia Power Company 20172018 Annual Report

Cost and Schedule
The Company's approximate proportionate sharean administrative claim filed in the Westinghouse bankruptcy proceedings. Through the nineteenth VCM, the Georgia PSC has approved total construction capital costs incurred through June 30, 2018 of the remaining estimated capital cost to complete Plant Vogtle Units 3 and 4 with in service dates of November 2021 and November 2022, respectively, is as follows:
 (in billions)
Project capital cost forecast$7.3
Net investment as of December 31, 2017(3.4)
Remaining estimate to complete$3.9
Note: Excludes financing costs capitalized through AFUDC and is net$5.4 billion (before $1.7 billion of payments received under the Guarantee Settlement Agreement and approximately $188 million in related Customer Refunds). In addition, the Customer Refunds.staff of the Georgia PSC requested, and Georgia Power agreed, to file its twentieth VCM report concurrently with the twenty-first VCM report by August 31, 2019.
The ultimate outcome of these matters cannot be determined at this time.
DOE Financing
At December 31, 2018, Georgia Power had borrowed $2.6 billion related to Plant Vogtle Units 3 and 4 costs through the Loan Guarantee Agreement and a multi-advance credit facility among Georgia Power, the DOE, and the FFB, which provides for borrowings of up to $3.46 billion, subject to the satisfaction of certain conditions. In September 2017, the DOE issued a conditional commitment to Georgia Power for up to approximately $1.67 billion in additional guaranteed loans under the Loan Guarantee Agreement. In September 2018, the DOE extended the conditional commitment to March 31, 2019. Any further extension must be approved by the DOE. Final approval and issuance of these additional loan guarantees by the DOE cannot be assured and are subject to the negotiation of definitive agreements, completion of due diligence by the DOE, receipt of any necessary regulatory approvals, and satisfaction of other conditions. See Note 8 to the financial statements under "Long-term Debt – DOE Loan Guarantee Borrowings" for additional information, including applicable covenants, events of default, mandatory prepayment events (including any decision not to continue construction of Plant Vogtle Units 3 and 4), and conditions to borrowing.
The ultimate outcome of these matters cannot be determined at this time.
Income Tax Matters
Federal Tax Reform Legislation
In December 2017, the Tax Reform Legislation was signed into law and became effective on January 1, 2018. The Tax Reform Legislation, among other things, reduced the federal corporate income tax rate to 21%, retained normalization provisions for public utility property and existing renewable energy incentives, and repealed the corporate alternative minimum tax. In addition, under the Tax Reform Legislation, net operating losses generated after December 31, 2017 can no longer be carried back to previous tax years but can be carried forward indefinitely, with utilization limited to 80% of taxable income of the subsequent tax year. The projected reduction of Southern Company's consolidated income tax liability resulting from the tax rate reduction also delays the expected utilization of existing tax credit carryforwards at Georgia Power. See Note 10 to the financial statements for information on Southern Company's joint consolidated income tax allocation agreement.
Following the enactment of the Tax Reform Legislation, the SEC staff issued Staff Accounting Bulletin 118 – "Income Tax Accounting Implications of the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act" (SAB 118), which provided for a measurement period of up to one year from the enactment date to complete accounting under GAAP for the tax effects of the legislation. Due to the complex and comprehensive nature of the enacted tax law changes and their application under GAAP, Georgia Power considered all amounts recorded in the financial statements as a result of the Tax Reform Legislation "provisional" as discussed in SAB 118 and subject to revision prior to filing its 2017 tax return in the fourth quarter 2018. Georgia Power recognized tax benefits of $50 million and $8 million in 2018 and 2017, respectively, for a total of $58 million as a result of the Tax Reform Legislation. In addition, in total, Georgia Power recorded a $147 million decrease in regulatory assets and a $3.0 billion increase in regulatory liabilities as a result of the Tax Reform Legislation and $2 million of stranded excess deferred tax balances in AOCI at December 31, 2017 were adjusted through retained earnings in 2018. As of December 31, 2018, Georgia Power considered the measurement of impacts from the Tax Reform Legislation on deferred income tax assets and liabilities, primarily due to the impact of the reduction of the corporate income tax rate, to be complete.
However, the IRS continues to issue regulations that provide further interpretation and guidance on the law and each state's adoption of the provisions contained in the Tax Reform Legislation remains uncertain. The ultimate impact of this matter cannot be determined at this time. See Note 2 to the financial statements under "Georgia Power – Rate Plans" for additional information regarding the Georgia Power Tax Reform Settlement Agreement. The regulatory treatment of certain impacts of the Tax Reform Legislation remains subject to the discretion of the Georgia PSC in the Georgia Power 2019 Base Rate Case and the FERC. Also, see FINANCIAL CONDITION AND LIQUIDITY – "Credit Rating Risk" herein and Note 10 to the financial statements under "Current and Deferred Income Taxes" for additional information.

MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS (continued)
Georgia Power Company 2018 Annual Report

Bonus Depreciation
Under the Tax Reform Legislation, projects with binding contracts prior to September 28, 2017 and placed in service after September 27, 2017 remain eligible for bonus depreciation under the PATH Act. The PATH Act allowed for 50% bonus depreciation for 2015 through 2017, 40% bonus depreciation for 2018, and 30% bonus depreciation for 2019 and certain long-lived assets placed in service in 2020. Based on provisional estimates, bonus depreciation is expected to result in positive cash flows of approximately $80 million for the 2018 tax year and approximately $30 million for the 2019 tax year. The ultimate outcome of this matter cannot be determined at this time.
Other Matters
Georgia Power is involved in various other matters being litigated and regulatory matters that could affect future earnings. In addition, Georgia Power is subject to certain claims and legal actions arising in the ordinary course of business. Georgia Power's business activities are subject to extensive governmental regulation related to public health and the environment, such as laws and regulations governing air, water, land, and protection of other natural resources. Litigation over environmental issues and claims of various types, including property damage, personal injury, common law nuisance, and citizen enforcement of environmental laws and regulations, has occurred throughout the U.S. This litigation has included claims for damages alleged to have been caused by CO2 and other emissions, CCR, and alleged exposure to hazardous materials, and/or requests for injunctive relief in connection with such matters.
The ultimate outcome of such pending or potential litigation or regulatory matters cannot be predicted at this time; however, for current proceedings not specifically reported herein or in Notes 2 and 3 to the financial statements, management does not anticipate that the ultimate liabilities, if any, arising from such current proceedings would have a material effect on Georgia Power's financial statements. See Notes 2 and 3 to the financial statements for a discussion of various other contingencies, regulatory matters, and other matters being litigated which may affect future earnings potential.
ACCOUNTING POLICIES
Application of Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates
Georgia Power prepares its financial statements in accordance with GAAP. Significant accounting policies are described in Notes 1, 5, and 6 to the financial statements. In the application of these policies, certain estimates are made that may have a material impact on Georgia Power's results of operations and related disclosures. Different assumptions and measurements could produce estimates that its financingare significantly different from those recorded in the financial statements. Senior management has reviewed and discussed the following critical accounting policies and estimates with the Audit Committee of Southern Company's Board of Directors.
Utility Regulation
Georgia Power is subject to retail regulation by the Georgia PSC and wholesale regulation by the FERC. These regulatory agencies set the rates Georgia Power is permitted to charge customers based on allowable costs. As a result, Georgia Power applies accounting standards which require the financial statements to reflect the effects of rate regulation. Through the ratemaking process, the regulators may require the inclusion of costs or revenues in periods different than when they would be recognized by a non-regulated company. This treatment may result in the deferral of expenses and the recording of related regulatory assets based on anticipated future recovery through rates or the deferral of gains or creation of liabilities and the recording of related regulatory liabilities. The application of the accounting standards has a further effect on Georgia Power's financial statements as a result of the estimates of allowable costs used in the ratemaking process. These estimates may differ from those actually incurred by Georgia Power; therefore, the accounting estimates inherent in specific costs such as depreciation, AROs, and pension and other postretirement benefits have less of a direct impact on Georgia Power's results of operations and financial condition than they would on a non-regulated company.
As reflected in Note 2 to the financial statements under "Georgia PowerRegulatory Assets and Liabilities," significant regulatory assets and liabilities have been recorded. Management reviews the ultimate recoverability of these regulatory assets and any requirement to refund these regulatory liabilities based on applicable regulatory guidelines and GAAP. However, adverse legislative, judicial, or regulatory actions could materially impact the amounts of such regulatory assets and liabilities and could adversely impact Georgia Power's financial statements.
Estimated Cost, Schedule, and Rate Recovery for the Construction of Plant Vogtle Units 3 and 4
In 2016, the Georgia PSC approved the Vogtle Cost Settlement Agreement, which resolved certain prudency matters in connection with Georgia Power's fifteenth VCM report. In December 2017, the Georgia PSC approved Georgia Power's seventeenth VCM

MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS (continued)
Georgia Power Company 2018 Annual Report

report, which included a recommendation to continue construction of Plant Vogtle Units 3 and 4, will total approximately $3.1with Southern Nuclear serving as project manager and Bechtel serving as the primary construction contractor, as well as a modification of the Vogtle Cost Settlement Agreement. The Georgia PSC's related order stated that under the modified Vogtle Cost Settlement Agreement, (i) none of the $3.3 billion of which $1.6 billion had beencosts incurred through December 31, 2017.2015 should be disallowed as imprudent; (ii) capital costs incurred up to $5.68 billion would be presumed to be reasonable and prudent with the burden of proof on any party challenging such costs; (iii) Georgia Power would have the burden of proof to show that any capital costs above $5.68 billion were prudent; (iv) Georgia Power's total project capital cost forecast of $7.3 billion (net of $1.7 billion received under the Guarantee Settlement Agreement and approximately $188 million in related Customer Refunds) was found reasonable and did not represent a cost cap; and (v) prudence decisions would be made subsequent to achieving fuel load for Unit 4.
In its order, the Georgia PSC also stated if other conditions change and assumptions upon which Georgia Power's seventeenth VCM report are based do not materialize, the Georgia PSC reserved the right to reconsider the decision to continue construction.
In the second quarter 2018, Georgia Power revised its base cost forecast and estimated contingency to complete construction and start-up of Plant Vogtle Units 3 and 4 to $8.0 billion and $0.4 billion, respectively, for a total project capital cost forecast of $8.4 billion (net of $1.7 billion received under the Guarantee Settlement Agreement and approximately $188 million in related Customer Refunds). Although Georgia Power believes these incremental costs are reasonable and necessary to complete the project and the Georgia PSC's order in the seventeenth VCM proceeding specifically states that the construction of Plant Vogtle Units 3 and 4 is not subject to a cost cap, Georgia Power did not seek rate recovery for the $0.7 billion increase in costs included in the current base capital cost forecast in the nineteenth VCM report. In connection with future VCM filings, Georgia Power may request the Georgia PSC to evaluate costs currently included in the construction contingency estimate for rate recovery as and when they are appropriately included in the base capital cost forecast. After considering the significant level of uncertainty that exists regarding the future recoverability of costs included in the construction contingency estimate since the ultimate outcome of these matters is subject to the outcome of future assessments by management, as well as Georgia PSC decisions in these future regulatory proceedings, Georgia Power recorded a total pre-tax charge to income of $1.1 billion ($0.8 billion after tax) in the second quarter 2018.
Georgia Power's revised cost estimate reflects an expected in-service date of November 2021 for Unit 3 and November 2022 for Unit 4.
As construction continues, challenges with management of contractors, subcontractors, and vendors,vendors; labor productivity, and availability, and/or cost escalation; procurement, fabrication, delivery, assembly, and/or installation and installationtesting, including any required engineering changes, of plant systems, structures, and components (some of which are based on new technology and have not yet operatedthat only recently began initial operation in the global nuclear industry at this scale),; or other issues could arise and change the projected schedule and estimated cost. Monthly construction production targets required to maintain the current project schedule will continue to increase significantly throughout 2019. To meet these increasing monthly targets, existing craft construction productivity must improve and additional craft laborers must be retained and deployed.
Georgia Power and Southern Nuclear believe it is a leading practice in connection with a construction project of this size and complexity to periodically validate recent construction progress in comparison to the projected schedule and to verify and update quantities of commodities remaining to install, labor productivity, and forecasted staffing needs. This verification process, led by Southern Nuclear, was underway as of December 31, 2018 and is expected to be completed during the second quarter 2019. Georgia Power currently does not anticipate any material changes to the total estimated project capital cost forecast for Plant Vogtle Units 3 and 4 or the expected in-service dates of November 2021 and November 2022, respectively, resulting from this verification process. However, the ultimate impact on cost and schedule, if any, will not be known until the verification process is completed. Georgia Power is required to report the results and any project impacts to the Georgia PSC by May 15, 2019.
There have been technical and procedural challenges to the construction and licensing of Plant Vogtle Units 3 and 4 at the federal and state level and additional challenges may arise. Processes are in place that are designed to assure compliance with the requirements specified in the Westinghouse Design Control Document and the combined construction and operating licenses, including inspections by Southern Nuclear and the NRC that occur throughout construction. As a result of such compliance processes, certain license amendment requests have been filed and approved or are pending before the NRC. Various design and other licensing-based compliance matters, including the timely resolution of Inspections, Tests, Analyses, and Acceptance CriteriaITAAC and the related approvals by the NRC, may arise, which may result in additional license amendments or require other resolution. If any license amendment requests or other licensing-based compliance issues are not resolved in a timely manner, there may be delays in the project schedule that could result in increased costs.
The ultimate outcome of these matters cannot be determined at this time.
Other Matters
As Any extension of December 31, 2017, the Company had borrowed $2.6 billion related to Plant Vogtle Unitsin-service dates of November 2021 for Unit 3 and November 2022 for Unit 4 costs through the Loan Guarantee Agreement and a multi-advance credit facility among the Company, the DOE, and the FFB, which provides for borrowings of upis currently estimated to $3.46 billion, subject to the satisfaction of certain conditions. On September 28, 2017, the DOE issued a conditional commitment to the Company for up to approximately $1.67 billionresult in additional guaranteed loans under the Loan Guarantee Agreement. This conditional commitment expiresbase capital costs of approximately $50 million per month, based on June 30, 2018, subject to any further extension approved by the DOE. Final approvalGeorgia Power's ownership interests, and issuanceAFUDC of these additional loan guarantees by the DOE cannot be assured and are subject to the negotiation of definitive agreements, completion of due diligence by the DOE, receipt of any necessary regulatory approvals, and satisfaction of other conditions. See Note 6 to the financial statements under "DOE Loan Guarantee Borrowings" for additional information, including applicable covenants, events of default, mandatory prepayment events, and conditions to borrowing.
The ultimate outcome of these matters cannot be determined at this time.
Income Tax Matters
Federal Tax Reform Legislation
On December 22, 2017, the Tax Reform Legislation was signed into law and became effective on January 1, 2018. The Tax Reform Legislation, among other things, reduces the federal corporate income tax rate to 21%, retains normalization provisions for public utility property and existing renewable energy incentives, and repeals the corporate alternative minimum tax.
Regulated utility businesses can continue deducting all business interest expense and are not eligible for bonus depreciation on capital assets acquired and placed in service after September 27, 2017. Projects with binding contracts before September 28, 2017 and placed in service after September 27, 2017 remain eligible for bonus depreciation under the Protecting Americans from Tax Hikes (PATH) Act.
In addition, under the Tax Reform Legislation, net operating losses (NOLs) generated after December 31, 2017 can no longer be carried back to previous tax years but can be carried forward indefinitely, with utilization limited to 80% of taxable income of theapproximately $12 million per month. While
    Table of Contents                                Index to Financial Statements

MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS (continued)
Georgia Power Company 20172018 Annual Report

subsequent tax year. The projected reductionGeorgia Power is not precluded from seeking recovery of Southern Company's consolidated income tax liability resulting from the tax rate reduction also delays the expected utilization of existing tax credit carryforwards.
For the year ended December 31, 2017, implementation of the Tax Reform Legislation resulted in an estimated net tax benefit of $8 million, a $150 million decrease in regulatory assets, and a $3.1 billionany future capital cost forecast increase, in regulatory liabilities, primarily duemanagement will ultimately determine whether or not to seek recovery. Any further changes to the impactcapital cost forecast that are not expected to be recoverable through regulated rates will be required to be charged to income and such charges could be material.
Given the significant complexity involved in estimating the future costs to complete construction and start-up of Plant Vogtle Units 3 and 4 and the reductionsignificant management judgment necessary to assess the related uncertainties surrounding future rate recovery of the corporate income tax rate on deferred tax assets and liabilities.
The Tax Reform Legislation is subject to further interpretation and guidance from the IRS,any projected cost increases, as well as each respective state's adoption. In addition, the regulatory treatmentpotential impact on Georgia Power's results of certain impacts of the Tax Reform Legislation is subjectoperations and cash flows, Georgia Power considers these items to the discretion of the FERC and the Georgia PSC. On January 31, 2018, SCS, on behalf of the traditional electric operating companies (including the Company), filed with the FERC a reduction to the Company's open access transmission tariff charge for 2018 to reflect the revised federal corporate tax rate.be critical accounting estimates. See Note 32 to the financial statements under "Regulatory Matters""Georgia Power – Nuclear Construction" for additional information regarding the Company's rate filing to reflect the impacts of the Tax Reform Legislation.
See FINANCIAL CONDITION AND LIQUIDITY – "Credit Rating Risk" herein and Note 5 to the financial statements under "Current and Deferred Income Taxes" for additional information.
The ultimate outcome of these matters cannot be determined at this time.
Bonus Depreciation
Under the Tax Reform Legislation, projects with binding contracts prior to September 28, 2017 and placed in service after September 27, 2017 remain eligible for bonus depreciation under the PATH Act. The PATH Act allowed for 50% bonus depreciation for 2015 through 2017, 40% bonus depreciation for 2018, and 30% bonus depreciation for 2019 and certain long-lived assets placed in service in 2020. Based on provisional estimates, bonus depreciation is expected to result in positive cash flows of approximately $270 million for the 2017 tax year and approximately $120 million for the 2018 tax year. Should Southern Company have a NOL in 2018, all of these cash flows may not be fully realized in 2018. See Note 5 to the financial statements under "Current and Deferred Income Taxes" for additional information.
Other Matters
The Company is involved in various other matters being litigated and regulatory matters that could affect future earnings. In addition, the Company is subject to certain claims and legal actions arising in the ordinary course of business. The Company's business activities are subject to extensive governmental regulation related to public health and the environment, such as regulation of air emissions and water discharges. Litigation over environmental issues and claims of various types, including property damage, personal injury, common law nuisance, and citizen enforcement of environmental requirements, such as standards for air, water, land, and protection of other natural resources, has occurred throughout the U.S. This litigation has included claims for damages alleged to have been caused by CO2 and other emissions, CCR, and alleged exposure to hazardous materials, and/or requests for injunctive relief in connection with such matters.
The ultimate outcome of such pending or potential litigation or regulatory matters cannot be predicted at this time; however, for current proceedings not specifically reported herein or in Note 3 to the financial statements, management does not anticipate that the ultimate liabilities, if any, arising from such current proceedings would have a material effect on the Company's financial statements. See Note 3 to the financial statements for a discussion of various other contingencies, regulatory matters, and other matters being litigated which may affect future earnings potential.
The Company regularly reviews its business to transform and modernize. Primarily in response to changing customer expectations and payment patterns, including electronic payments and alternative payment locations, and ongoing efforts to increase overall operating efficiencies, in 2017, the Company initiated the closure of its remaining payment offices and an employee attrition plan affecting approximately 300 positions. Charges associated with these activities did not have a material impact on the Company's results of operations, financial position, or cash flows. The efficiencies gained are expected to place downward pressure on operating costs in 2018.
ACCOUNTING POLICIES
Application of Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates
The Company prepares its financial statements in accordance with GAAP. Significant accounting policies are described in Note 1 to the financial statements. In the application of these policies, certain estimates are made that may have a material impact on the Company's results of operations and related disclosures. Different assumptions and measurements could produce estimates that are significantly different from those recorded in the financial statements. Senior management has reviewed and discussed the following critical accounting policies and estimates with the Audit Committee of Southern Company's Board of Directors.

MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS (continued)
Georgia Power Company 2017 Annual Report

Utility Regulation
The Company is subject to retail regulation by the Georgia PSC and wholesale regulation by the FERC. These regulatory agencies set the rates the Company is permitted to charge customers based on allowable costs. As a result, the Company applies accounting standards which require the financial statements to reflect the effects of rate regulation. Through the ratemaking process, the regulators may require the inclusion of costs or revenues in periods different than when they would be recognized by a non-regulated company. This treatment may result in the deferral of expenses and the recording of related regulatory assets based on anticipated future recovery through rates or the deferral of gains or creation of liabilities and the recording of related regulatory liabilities. The application of the accounting standards has a further effect on the Company's financial statements as a result of the estimates of allowable costs used in the ratemaking process. These estimates may differ from those actually incurred by the Company; therefore, the accounting estimates inherent in specific costs such as depreciation, AROs, and pension and other postretirement benefits have less of a direct impact on the Company's results of operations and financial condition than they would on a non-regulated company.
As reflected in Note 1 to the financial statements, significant regulatory assets and liabilities have been recorded. Management reviews the ultimate recoverability of these regulatory assets and any requirement to refund these regulatory liabilities based on applicable regulatory guidelines and GAAP. However, adverse legislative, judicial, or regulatory actions could materially impact the amounts of such regulatory assets and liabilities and could adversely impact the Company's financial statements.
Federal Tax Reform Legislation
Following the enactment of Tax Reform Legislation, the SEC staff issued Staff Accounting Bulletin 118 – "Income Tax Accounting Implications of the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act" (SAB 118), which provides for a measurement period of up to one year from the enactment date to complete accounting under GAAP for the tax effects of the legislation. Due to the complex and comprehensive nature of the enacted tax law changes, and their application under GAAP, the Company considers all amounts recorded in the financial statements as a result of Tax Reform Legislation to be "provisional" as discussed in SAB 118 and subject to revision. The Company is awaiting additional guidance from industry and income tax authorities in order to finalize its accounting. The ultimate impact of Tax Reform Legislation on deferred income tax assets and liabilities and the related regulatory assets and liabilities cannot be determined at this time. See FUTURE EARNINGS POTENTIAL – "Income Tax Matters – Federal Tax Reform Legislation" herein and Notes 3 and 5 to the financial statements under "Retail Regulatory Matters – Rate Plans" and "Current and Deferred Income Taxes," respectively, for additional information.
Asset Retirement Obligations
AROs are computed as the fair value of the estimated ultimate costs for an asset's future retirement and are recorded in the period in which the liability is incurred. The estimated costs are capitalized as part of the related long-lived asset and depreciated over the asset's useful life. In the absence of quoted market prices, AROs are estimated using present value techniques in which estimates of future cash outlays associated with the asset retirements are discounted using a credit-adjusted risk-free rate. Estimates of the timing and amounts of future cash outlays are based on projections of when and how the assets will be retired and the cost of future removal activities.
The liability for AROs primarily relates to the decommissioning of the Company'sGeorgia Power's nuclear facilities, which include the Company'sGeorgia Power's ownership interests in Plant Hatch and Plant Vogtle Units 1 and 2, and facilities that are subject to the CCR Rule and the related state rule, principally ash ponds. In addition, the CompanyGeorgia Power has retirement obligationsAROs related to various landfill sites, underground storage tanks, and asbestos removal. The Company
Georgia Power also has identified retirement obligations related to certain transmission and distribution facilities, including the disposal of polychlorinated biphenyls in certain transformers; leasehold improvements; equipment on customer property; and property associated with the Company'sGeorgia Power's rail lines and natural gas pipelines. However, liabilities for the removal of these assets have not been recorded because the settlement timing for the retirement obligations related to these assets is indeterminable and, therefore, the fair value of the retirement obligations cannot be reasonably estimated. A liability for these AROsretirement obligations will be recognized when sufficient information becomes available to support a reasonable estimation of the ARO.retirement obligation.
The CompanyGeorgia Power previously recorded AROs as a result of state requirements in Georgia which closely align with the requirements of the CCR Rule discussed above. The cost estimates for AROs related to the disposal of CCR are based on information using various assumptions related to closure and post-closure costs, timing of future cash outlays, inflation and discount rates, and the potential methods for complying with the CCR Rule and the related state rule. In December 2018, Georgia Power recorded an increase of approximately $3.1 billion to its AROs related to the disposal of CCR as a result of a strategic assessment which indicated additional closure costs will be required to close the ash ponds, primarily due to changes in closure strategies, the estimated amount of ash to be excavated, and additional water management requirements necessary to support closure strategies. Also in December 2018, Georgia Power recorded an increase of approximately $130 million to its AROs as a result of updated decommissioning cost site studies for closure. As further analysis is performedPlant Hatch and closure details are developed, the Company will continuePlant Vogtle Units 1 and 2. Georgia Power expects to periodically update theseits ARO cost estimates as necessary.estimates. See FUTURE EARNINGS POTENTIAL – "Environmental Matters – Environmental Laws and Regulations – Coal Combustion Residuals" herein and Note 16 to the financial statements under "Asset Retirement Obligations and Other Costs of Removal" and "Nuclear Decommissioning" for additional information.

MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS (continued)
Georgia Power Company 2017 Annual Report

Given the significant judgment involved in estimating AROs, the CompanyGeorgia Power considers the liabilities for AROs to be critical accounting estimates.
Pension and Other Postretirement Benefits
The Company'sGeorgia Power's calculation of pension and other postretirement benefits expense is dependent on a number of assumptions. These assumptions include discount rates, healthcare cost trend rates, expected long-term return on plan assets, mortality rates, expected salary and wage increases, and other factors. Components of pension and other postretirement benefits expense include interest and service cost on the pension and other postretirement benefit plans, expected return on plan assets, and amortization of certain unrecognized costs and obligations. Actual results that differ from the assumptions utilized are accumulated and amortized over future periods and, therefore, generally affect recognized expense and the recorded obligation in future periods. While the CompanyGeorgia Power believes that the assumptions used are appropriate, differences in actual experience or significant changes in assumptions would affect its pension and other postretirement benefitsbenefit costs and obligations.
Key elements in determining the Company'sGeorgia Power's pension and other postretirement benefit expense are the expected long-term return on plan assets and the discount rate used to measure the benefit plan obligations and the periodic benefit plan expense for future periods. The expected long-term return on pension and other postretirement benefit plan assets is based on theSouthern Company's investment strategy, historical experience, and expectations for long-term rates of return that consider external actuarial advice. The

MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS (continued)
Georgia Power Company 2018 Annual Report

Southern Company determines the long-term return on plan assets by applying the long-term rate of expected returns on various asset classes to theSouthern Company's target asset allocation. For purposes of determining itsGeorgia Power's liability related to the pension and other postretirement benefit plans, theSouthern Company discounts the future related cash flows using a single-point discount rate for each plan developed from the weighted average of market-observed yields for high quality fixed income securities with maturities that correspond to expected benefit payments. For 2015 and prior years, the Company computed the interest cost component of its net periodic pension and other postretirement benefit plan expense using the same single-point discount rate. Beginning in 2016, the Company adopted a full yield curve approach for calculating the interest cost component whereby the discount rate for each year is applied to the liability for that specific year. As a result, the interest cost component of net periodic pension and other postretirement benefit plan expense decreased by approximately $35 million in 2016.
A 25 basis point change in any significant assumption (discount rate, salaries,salary increases, or long-term rate of return on plan assets) would result in an $11a $10 million or less change in total annual benefit expense, and a $172$128 million or less change in the projected obligations.obligation for the pension plan, and an $18 million or less change in the projected obligation for other postretirement benefit plans.
See Note 211 to the financial statements for additional information regarding pension and other postretirement benefits.
Contingent Obligations
The CompanyGeorgia Power is subject to a number of federal and state laws and regulations, as well as other factors and conditions that subject it to environmental, litigation, and other risks. See FUTURE EARNINGS POTENTIAL herein and NoteNotes 2 and 3 to the financial statements for more information regarding certain of these contingencies. The CompanyGeorgia Power periodically evaluates its exposure to such risks and records reserves for those matters where a non-tax-related loss is considered probable and reasonably estimable. The adequacy of reserves can be significantly affected by external events or conditions that can be unpredictable; thus, the ultimate outcome of such matters could materially affect the Company'sGeorgia Power's results of operations, cash flows, or financial condition.
Recently Issued Accounting Standards
RevenueSee Note 1 to the financial statements under "Recently Adopted Accounting Standards" for additional information.
In 2014, the FASB issued ASC 606, Revenue from Contracts with Customers (ASC 606), replacing the existing accounting standard and industry specific guidance for revenue recognition with a five-step model for recognizing and measuring revenue from contracts with customers. The underlying principle of the new standard is to recognize revenue to depict the transfer of goods or services to customers at the amount expected to be collected. The new standard also requires enhanced disclosures regarding the nature, amount, timing, and uncertainty of revenue and the related cash flows arising from contracts with customers.
Most of the Company's revenue, including energy provided to customers, is from tariff offerings that provide electricity without a defined contractual term, as well as longer-term contractual commitments, including PPAs.
The Company has completed the evaluation of all revenue streams and determined that the adoption of ASC 606 will not change the current timing of revenue recognition for such transactions. Some revenue arrangements, such as energy-related derivatives, are excluded from the scope of ASC 606 and, therefore, will be accounted for and disclosed separately from revenues under ASC 606. The Company has concluded contributions in aid of construction are not in scope for ASC 606 and will continue to be accounted for as an offset to property, plant, and equipment.

MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS (continued)
Georgia Power Company 2017 Annual Report

The new standard is effective for reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2017. The Company applied the modified retrospective method of adoption effective January 1, 2018. The Company also utilized practical expedients which allowed it to apply the standard to open contracts at the date of adoption and to reflect the aggregate effect of all modifications when identifying performance obligations and allocating the transaction price for contracts modified before the effective date. Under the modified retrospective method of adoption, prior year reported results are not restated; however, a cumulative-effect adjustment to retained earnings at January 1, 2018 is recorded. In addition, quarterly disclosures will include comparative information on 2018 financial statement line items under current guidance. The adoption of ASC 606 did not result in a cumulative-effect adjustment.
Leases
In February 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-02, Leases (Topic 842) (ASU 2016-02). ASU 2016-02 requires lessees to recognize on the balance sheet a lease liability and a right-of-use asset for all leases. ASU 2016-02 also changes the recognition, measurement, and presentation of expense associated with leases and provides clarification regarding the identification of certain components of contracts that would represent a lease. The accounting required by lessors is relatively unchanged. ASU 2016-02 is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2018 and the Company will adoptGeorgia Power adopted the new standard effective January 1, 2019.
The Company is currently implementing an information technology system along withGeorgia Power elected the related changestransition methodology provided by ASU No. 2018-11, Leases (Topic 842): Targeted Improvements, whereby the requirements of ASU 2016-02 are applied on a prospective basis as of the adoption date of January 1, 2019, without restating prior periods. Georgia Power elected the package of practical expedients provided by ASU 2016-02 that allows prior determinations of whether existing contracts are, or contain, leases and the classification of existing leases to continue without reassessment. Additionally, Georgia Power applied the use-of-hindsight practical expedient in determining lease terms as of the date of adoption and elected the practical expedient that allows existing land easements not previously accounted for as leases not to be reassessed. Georgia Power also made accounting policy elections to account for short-term leases in all asset classes as off-balance sheet leases and combined lease and non-lease components in the computations of lease obligations and right-of-use assets for most asset classes.
Georgia Power completed the implementation of a new application to track and account for its leases and updated its internal controls and accounting policies that willto support the accounting for leases under ASU 2016-02. In addition, the Company has substantiallyGeorgia Power completed a detailedits lease inventory and analysis ofdetermined its leases. In terms of rental charges and duration of contracts, the most significant leases relate toinvolve PPAs and cellular towers wherereal estate. In the Company isfirst quarter 2019, the lessee and to outdoor lighting where the Company is the lessor. The Company is currently analyzing pole attachment agreements, and a lease determination has not been made at this time. While the Company has not yet determined the ultimate impact, adoption of ASU 2016-02 is expected to have a significantresulted in recording lease liabilities and right-of-use assets on Georgia Power's balance sheet each totaling approximately $1.5 billion, with no impact on the Company's balance sheet.
Other
On March 10, 2017, the FASB issued ASU No. 2017-07, Compensation – Retirement Benefits (Topic 715): Improving the PresentationGeorgia Power's statement of Net Periodic Pension Cost and Net Periodic Postretirement Benefit Cost (ASU 2017-07). ASU 2017-07 requires that an employer report the service cost component in the same line item or items as other compensation costs and requires the other components of net periodic pension and postretirement benefit costs to be separately presented in the income statement outside of income from operations. Additionally, only the service cost component is eligible for capitalization, when applicable. However, all cost components remain eligible for capitalization under FERC regulations. ASU 2017-07 will be applied retrospectively for the presentation of the service cost component and the other components of net periodic pension and postretirement benefit costs in the income statement. The capitalization of only the service cost component of net periodic pension and postretirement benefit costs in assets will be applied on a prospective basis. ASU 2017-07 is effective for periods beginning after December 15, 2017. The presentation changes required for net periodic pension and postretirement benefit costs will result in a decrease in the Company's operating income and an increase in other income for 2016 and 2017 and are expected to result in a decrease in operating income and an increase in other income for 2018. The Company adopted ASU 2017-07 effective January 1, 2018 with no material impact on its financial statements.
On August 28, 2017, the FASB issued ASU No. 2017-12, Derivatives and Hedging (Topic 815): Targeted Improvements to Accounting for Hedging Activities (ASU 2017-12), amending the hedge accounting recognition and presentation requirements. ASU 2017-12 makes more financial and non-financial hedging strategies eligible for hedge accounting, amends the related presentation and disclosure requirements, and simplifies hedge effectiveness assessment requirements. ASU 2017-12 is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2018, with early adoption permitted. The Company adopted ASU 2017-12 effective January 1, 2018 with no material impact on its financial statements.income.
FINANCIAL CONDITION AND LIQUIDITY
Overview
The Company'sGeorgia Power's financial condition remained stable at December 31, 2017. The Company's2018. Georgia Power's cash requirements primarily consist of funding ongoing operations, common stock dividends, capital expenditures, and debt maturities. Capital expenditures and other investing activities include investments to build new generation facilities, including Plant Vogtle Units 3 and 4, to maintain existing generation facilities, to comply with environmental regulations including adding environmental modifications to existing generating units and closures of ash ponds, to expand and improve transmission and distribution facilities, and for restoration following major storms. Operating cash flows provide a substantial portion of the Company'sGeorgia Power's cash needs. For the three-year period from 20182019 through 2020, the Company's2021, Georgia Power's projected common stock dividends, capital expenditures, and debt maturities are expected to exceed operating cash flows. The CompanyGeorgia Power plans to finance future cash needs in excess of its operating cash flows primarily through external securities issuances, equity contributions from Southern Company, borrowings from financial
    Table of Contents                                Index to Financial Statements

MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS (continued)
Georgia Power Company 20172018 Annual Report

external securities issuances, equity contributions from Southern Company, borrowings from financial institutions, and borrowings through the FFB. The CompanyGeorgia Power plans to use commercial paper to manage seasonal variations in operating cash flows and for other working capital needs. The CompanyGeorgia Power intends to continue to monitor its access to short-term and long-term capital markets as well as bank credit arrangements to meet future capital and liquidity needs. See "Sources of Capital," "Financing Activities," and "Capital Requirements and Contractual Obligations" herein for additional information.
The Company'sGeorgia Power's investments in the qualified pension plan and nuclear decommissioning trust funds increaseddecreased in value as of December 31, 20172018 as compared to December 31, 2016.2017. No contributions to the qualified pension plan were made for the year ended December 31, 20172018 and no mandatory contributions to the qualified pension plan are anticipated during 2018. The Company2019. Georgia Power also funded approximately $5 million to its nuclear decommissioning trust funds in 2017.2018. See "Contractual Obligations" herein and Notes 16 and 211 to the financial statements under "Nuclear Decommissioning" and "Pension Plans," respectively, for additional information.
Net cash provided from operating activities totaled $2.8 billion in 2018, an increase of $857 million from 2017, primarily due to the timing of vendor and property tax payments and income tax refunds, a decrease in current income taxes related to the Tax Reform Legislation, increased fuel cost recovery, and the timing of fossil fuel stock purchases, partially offset by payments of customer refunds primarily related to the Guarantee Settlement Agreement and the Georgia Power Tax Reform Settlement Agreement. Net cash provided from operating activities totaled $1.9 billion in 2017, a decrease of $513 million from 2016, primarily due to the timing of vendor payments and increases in under-recovered fuel costs and prepaid federal income taxes, partially offset by a decrease in voluntary contributions to the qualified pension plan. Net cash provided from operating activities totaled $2.4 billion in 2016, a decrease of $92 million from 2015, primarily due to the voluntary contribution to the qualified pension plan in 2016, partially offset by the timing of vendor payments. See FUTURE EARNINGS POTENTIAL – "Income Tax Matters – Federal Tax Reform Legislation" herein and Note 510 to the financial statements for additional information regarding federal income taxes.
Net cash used for investing activities totaled $3.1 billion, $0.9 billion, and $2.3 billion in 2018, 2017, and $1.9 billion in 2017, 2016, and 2015, respectively, due to gross property additions primarily related to installation of equipment to comply with environmental standards;standards and construction of generation, transmission, and distribution facilities, including a total of $2.7 billion related to the construction of Plant Vogtle Units 3 and 4, partially offset in 2017 by $1.7 billion in payments received under the Guarantee Settlement Agreement; and purchases of nuclear fuel.Agreement. The majority of funds needed for gross property additions for the last several years has been provided from operating activities, capital contributions from Southern Company, and the issuance of debt. See FUTURE EARNINGS POTENTIAL – "Retail Regulatory Matters – Nuclear Construction" herein for additional information on the Guarantee Settlement Agreement and construction of Plant Vogtle Units 3 and 4.
Net cash used for financing activities totaled $400 million, $151 million, and $142 million for 2018, 2017, and $530 million for2016, respectively. The increase in cash used in 2018 compared to 2017 2016,was primarily due to lower issuances of senior notes and 2015, respectively.short-term bank debt and higher redemptions and repurchases of senior notes, partially offset by higher capital contributions from Southern Company and an increase in notes payable. The increase in cash used in 2017 compared to 2016 was primarily due to a decrease in notes payable, a decrease in borrowings from the FFB for construction of Plant Vogtle Units 3 and 4, and the redemption of all outstanding shares of the Company'sGeorgia Power's preferred and preference stock, partially offset by higher issuances of senior notes and junior subordinated notes and a decrease in maturities of senior notes. The decrease in cash used in 2016 compared to 2015 was primarily due to higher capital contributions from Southern Company, a decrease in redemptions and maturities of senior notes, and an increase in short-term debt, partially offset by higher common stock dividends and a decrease in borrowings from the FFB for construction of Plant Vogtle Units 3 and 4. Fluctuations in cash flow from financing activities vary from year to year based on capital needs and the maturity or redemption of securities.
Significant balance sheet changes in 20172018 included an increase of $3.1 billion in deferred credits related to income taxes and a decrease of $2.8 billion in accumulated deferred income taxes primarily resulting from the impacts of Tax Reform Legislation; an increase in property, plant, and equipment of $2.0$2.6 billion primarily related to the $3.2 billion increase in AROs, as well as the installation of equipment to comply with environmental standards and the construction of generation, transmission, and distribution facilities, partially offset by payments received under the Guarantee Settlement Agreement of $1.7 billion,and net of joint owner portion;the $1.1 billion charge related to the construction of Plant Vogtle Units 3 and 4; an increase of $1.2$2.0 billion in other regulatory assets, deferred primarily related to AROs; and a decrease of $1.9 billion in long-term debt (including securities due within one year) primarily due to issuancesthe redemption, repurchase, and maturity of senior notes and junior subordinated notes.the purchase of pollution control revenue bonds. Total common stockholder's equity increased $2.4 billion primarily due to a $3.0 billion increase in paid-in capital resulting from capital contributions received from Southern Company, partially offset by a $0.6 billion decrease in retained earnings primarily due to the charge related to Plant Vogtle Units 3 and 4. See FUTURE EARNINGS POTENTIAL – "Income Tax Matters – Federal Tax Reform Legislation" herein and Note 56 to the financial statements for additional information on Tax Reform LegislationAROs and Note 32 to the financial statements under "Retail Regulatory Matters"Georgia Power – Nuclear Construction" for additional information on the Guarantee Settlement Agreement.regarding Plant Vogtle Units 3 and 4.
The Company'sGeorgia Power's ratio of common equity to total capitalization plus short-term debt was 58.2% at December 31, 2018 and 49.7% at December 31, 2017 and 50.0% at December 31, 2016.2017. See Note 68 to the financial statements for additional information.
Sources of Capital
The CompanyGeorgia Power plans to obtain the funds required for construction and other purposes from sources similar to those used in the past, which were primarily from operating cash flows, external security issuances, borrowings from financial institutions, equity contributions from Southern Company, and borrowings from the FFB. However, the amount, type, and timing of any future financings, if needed, will depend upon regulatory approvals, prevailing market conditions, and other factors.

MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS (continued)
Georgia Power Company 2018 Annual Report

In 2014, the CompanyGeorgia Power entered into the Loan Guarantee Agreement with the DOE, under which the proceeds of borrowings may be used to reimburse the CompanyGeorgia Power for Eligible Project Costs incurred in connection with its construction of Plant Vogtle Units 3

MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS (continued)
Georgia Power Company 2017 Annual Report

and 4. Under the Loan Guarantee Agreement, the DOE agreed to guarantee borrowings of up to $3.46 billion (not to exceed 70% of Eligible Project Costs) to be made by the CompanyGeorgia Power under a multi-advance credit facility (FFB Credit Facility) among the Company,Georgia Power, the DOE, and the FFB. As ofAt December 31, 2017, the Company2018, Georgia Power had borrowed $2.6 billion under the FFB Credit Facility. OnIn July 27, 2017, the CompanyGeorgia Power entered into an amendment to the Loan Guarantee Agreement, which provides that further advances are conditioned upon the DOE's approval of any agreements entered into in replacement of the Vogtle 3 and 4 Agreement and satisfaction of certain other conditions.
OnIn September 28, 2017, the DOE issued a conditional commitment to the CompanyGeorgia Power for up to approximately $1.67 billion of additional guaranteed loans under the Loan Guarantee Agreement. This conditional commitment expires on June 30, 2018,March 31, 2019, subject to any further extension approved by the DOE. Final approval and issuance of these additional loan guarantees by the DOE cannot be assured and are subject to the negotiation of definitive agreements, completion of due diligence by the DOE, receipt of any necessary regulatory approvals, and satisfaction of other conditions. See Note 68 to the financial statements under "DOE"Long-term Debt – DOE Loan Guarantee Borrowings" for additional information regarding the Loan Guarantee Agreement, including applicable covenants, events of default, mandatory prepayment events (including any decision not to continue construction of Plant Vogtle Units 3 and 4), and additional conditions to borrowing. Also see Note 32 to the financial statements under "Retail Regulatory Matters"Georgia Power – Nuclear Construction" for additional information regarding Plant Vogtle Units 3 and 4.
The issuance of long-term securities by the CompanyGeorgia Power is subject to the approval of the Georgia PSC. In addition, the issuance of short-term debt securities by the CompanyGeorgia Power is subject to regulatory approval by the FERC. Additionally, with respect to the public offering of securities, the CompanyGeorgia Power files registration statements with the SEC under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended. The amounts of securities authorized by the Georgia PSC and the FERC are continuously monitored and appropriate filings are made to ensure flexibility in the capital markets.
The CompanyGeorgia Power obtains financing separately without credit support from any affiliate. See Note 68 to the financial statements under "Bank Credit Arrangements" for additional information. The Southern Company system does not maintain a centralized cash or money pool. Therefore, funds of the CompanyGeorgia Power are not commingled with funds of any other company in the Southern Company system.
At December 31, 2017, the Company's2018, Georgia Power's current liabilities exceeded current assets by $521 million. The Company's$1.4 billion primarily as a result of $0.6 billion of long-term debt that is due within one year and $0.3 billion of notes payable. Georgia Power's current liabilities frequently exceed current assets because of scheduled maturities of long-term debt and the periodic use of short-term debt as a funding source, as well as significant seasonal fluctuations in cash needs.
The Company intends to utilize operating cash flows, external security issuances, borrowings from financial institutions, equity contributions from Southern Company, and borrowings from the FFB to fund its short-term capital needs. The Company has substantial cash flow from operating activities and access to the capital markets and financial institutions to meet short-term liquidity needs.
At December 31, 2017, the Company2018, Georgia Power had approximately $852$4 million of cash and cash equivalents. AGeorgia Power's committed credit arrangement with banks was $1.75 billion at December 31, 2017 was $1.75 billion2018, of which $1.73$1.74 billion was unused. In May 2017, the Company amended its multi-yearThis credit arrangement which, among other things, extended the maturity date from 2020 toexpires in 2022.
This bank credit arrangement as well as the Company's term loan arrangements, contains a covenant that limits debt levels and contains a cross-acceleration provision to other indebtedness (including guarantee obligations) of the Company.Georgia Power. Such cross-acceleration provision to other indebtedness would trigger an event of default if the CompanyGeorgia Power defaulted on indebtedness, the payment of which was then accelerated. At December 31, 2017, the Company2018, Georgia Power was in compliance with this covenant. This bank credit arrangement does not contain a material adverse change clause at the time of borrowing.
Subject to applicable market conditions, the CompanyGeorgia Power expects to renew or replace this credit arrangement as needed prior to expiration. In connection therewith, the CompanyGeorgia Power may extend the maturity date and/or increase or decrease the lending commitments thereunder.
See Note 68 to the financial statements under "Bank Credit Arrangements" for additional information.
A portion of the $1.74 billion unused credit with banks is allocated to provide liquidity support to the Company'sGeorgia Power's pollution control revenue bonds and commercial paper program. The amount of variable rate pollution control revenue bonds outstanding requiring liquidity support as ofat December 31, 20172018 was $550$659 million as compared to $868$550 million at December 31, 2016.2017. In addition, at December 31, 2017, the Company2018, Georgia Power had $469obligations related to $345 million of pollution control revenue bonds outstanding that wereare required to be remarketed within the next 12 months. Subsequent to December 31, 2018, Georgia Power redeemed approximately $108 million of these obligations.
The CompanyGeorgia Power may also meet short-term cash needs through a Southern Company subsidiary organized to issue and sell commercial paper at the request and for the benefit of the CompanyGeorgia Power and the other traditional electric operating companies. Proceeds from such issuances for the benefit of the CompanyGeorgia Power are loaned directly to the Company.Georgia Power. The obligations of each
    Table of Contents                                Index to Financial Statements

MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS (continued)
Georgia Power Company 20172018 Annual Report

traditional electric operating company under these arrangements are several and there is no cross-affiliate credit support. Short-term borrowings are included in notes payable in the balance sheets.
Details of short-term borrowings were as follows:

Short-term Debt at the End of the Period
Short-term Debt During the Period (*)
Short-term Debt at the End of the Period
Short-term Debt During the Period (*)

Amount Outstanding
Weighted Average Interest Rate
Average Amount Outstanding
Weighted Average Interest Rate
Maximum Amount OutstandingAmount Outstanding
Weighted Average Interest Rate
Average Amount Outstanding
Weighted Average Interest Rate
Maximum Amount Outstanding

(in millions)


(in millions)


(in millions)(in millions)


(in millions)


(in millions)
December 31, 2018:








Commercial paper$294

3.1%
$127

2.5%
$710
Short-term bank debt

%
12

2.3%
150
Total$294

3.1%
$139

2.5%


December 31, 2017:




















Commercial paper$

%
$135

1.3%
$760
$

%
$135

1.3%
$760
Short-term bank debt150

2.2%
292

2.0%
800
150

2.2%
292

2.0%
800
Total$150

2.2%
$427

1.8%


$150

2.2%
$427

1.8%


December 31, 2016:























Commercial paper$392

1.1%
$87

0.8%
$443
$392

1.1%
$87

0.8%
$443
December 31, 2015:











Commercial paper$158

0.6%
$234

0.3%
$678
Short-term bank debt

%
62

0.8%
250
Total$158

0.6%
$296

0.4%


(*)Average and maximum amounts are based upon daily balances during the 12-month periods ended December 31, 2018, 2017, 2016, and 2015.2016.
The CompanyGeorgia Power believes the need for working capital can be adequately met by utilizing the commercial paper program, lines of credit, short-term bank notes, and operating cash flows.
Financing Activities
In addition to any financings that may be necessary to meet capital requirements and contractual obligations, the CompanyGeorgia Power plans to continue, when economically feasible, a program to retire higher-cost securities and replace these obligations with lower-cost capital if market conditions permit.
Senior Notes
In March 2017, the Company issued $450April 2018, Georgia Power redeemed all $250 million aggregate principal amount of its Series 2017A 2.00%2008B 5.40% Senior Notes due June 1, 2018.
In May 2018, through cash tender offers, Georgia Power repurchased and retired $89 million of the $250 million aggregate principal amount outstanding of its Series 2007A 5.65% Senior Notes due March 30, 2020 and $4001, 2037, $326 million of the $500 million aggregate principal amount outstanding of its Series 2017B 3.25%2009A 5.95% Senior Notes due March 30, 2027. The proceeds were used to repay a portionFebruary 1, 2039, and $335 million of the Company's short-term indebtedness and for general corporate purposes, including the Company's continuous construction program.
In June 2017, the Company repaid at maturity $450$600 million aggregate principal amount outstanding of its Series 2007B 5.70%2010B 5.40% Senior Notes.Notes due June 1, 2040, for an aggregate purchase price, excluding accrued and unpaid interest, of $902 million.
In August 2017, the Company issuedDecember 2018, Georgia Power repaid at maturity $500 million aggregate principal amount of its Series 2017C 2.00%2015A 1.95% Senior Notes due September 8, 2020. The proceeds were usedNotes.
Pollution Control Revenue Bonds
During 2018, Georgia Power purchased and held the following pollution control revenue bonds, which may be reoffered to repay the Company's $50 million short-term floating rate bank loan due December 1, 2017 and outstanding commercial paper borrowings and for general corporate purposes.public at a later date:
Junior Subordinated Notes
In September 2017, the Company issued $270approximately $105 million aggregate principal amount of Series 2017A 5.00% Junior Subordinated Notes due October 1, 2077. The proceeds were used to redeem all 1.8 million shares ($45 million aggregate liquidation amount)Development Authority of the Company's 6.125% Series Class A Preferred Stock and 2.25 million shares ($225 million aggregate liquidation amount) of the Company's 6.50% Series 2007A Preference Stock.
Burke County (Georgia) Pollution Control Revenue Bonds (Georgia Power Company Plant Vogtle Project), First Series 2013
In April 2017, the$173 million aggregate principal amount of Development Authority of Bartow County (Georgia) Pollution Control Revenue Bonds (Georgia Power Company purchased and held $27Plant Bowen Project), First Series 2009
$55 million aggregate principal amount of Development Authority of Burke County (Georgia) Pollution Control Revenue Bonds (Georgia Power Company Plant Vogtle Project), Fifth Series 1995. In October 2017, the Company remarketed these bonds to the public.1994
    Table of Contents                                Index to Financial Statements

MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS (continued)
Georgia Power Company 20172018 Annual Report

In August 2017, the$65 million aggregate principal amount of Development Authority of Burke County (Georgia) Pollution Control Revenue Bonds (Georgia Power Company purchased and held $38Plant Vogtle Project), Second Series 2008
approximately $72 million aggregate principal amount of Development Authority of Bartow County (Georgia) Pollution Control Revenue Bonds (Georgia Power Company Plant Bowen Project), First Series 1997. In October 2017, the Company remarketed these bonds to the public.
Other2013
In June 2017,December 2018, the Company entered into three floating rate bank loans in aggregate principal amountsDevelopment Authority of $50 million, $150 million, and $100 million, with maturity dates of December 1, 2017, May 31, 2018, and June 28, 2018, respectively, bearing interest based on one-month LIBOR. Also in June 2017, the Company borrowed $500 million pursuant to a short-term uncommitted bank credit arrangement, which bears interest at a rate agreed upon by the Company and the bank from time to time and is payable on no less than 30 days' demand by the bank. The proceeds from these bank loans were used to repay a portion of the Company's existing indebtedness and for working capital and other general corporate purposes, including the Company's continuous construction program.
In August 2017, the Company repaid $250 million of the $500Burke County (Georgia) issued approximately $108 million aggregate principal amount outstanding pursuantof Pollution Control Revenue Bonds (Georgia Power Company Plant Vogtle Project), First Series 2018 due November 1, 2052 for the benefit of Georgia Power. The proceeds were used to its uncommitted bank credit arrangement. Alsoredeem, in August 2017, the Company amended its $100January 2019, approximately $13 million, floating rate bank loan to extend the maturity date from June 28, 2018 to October 26, 2018.
In December 2017, the Company repaid the remaining $250$20 million, and $75 million aggregate principal amount outstanding pursuant to its uncommitted bank credit arrangement.of Development Authority of Burke County (Georgia) Pollution Control Revenue Bonds (Georgia Power Company Plant Vogtle Project), First Series 1992, Eighth Series 1994, and Second Series 1995, respectively.
Subsequent to December 31, 2017, the CompanyOther
In January 2018, Georgia Power repaid its outstanding $150 million and $100 million floating rate bank loans due May 31, 2018 and October 26, 2018, respectively.
Credit Rating Risk
At December 31, 2017, the Company2018, Georgia Power did not have any credit arrangements that would require material changes in payment schedules or terminations as a result of a credit rating downgrade.
There are certain contracts that could require collateral, but not accelerated payment, in the event of a credit rating change to BBB- and/or Baa3 or below. These contracts are for physical electricity purchases and sales, fuel purchases, fuel transportation and storage, energy price risk management, transmission, interest rate management, and construction of new generation at Plant Vogtle Units 3 and 4.
The maximum potential collateral requirements under these contracts at December 31, 20172018 were as follows:
Credit Ratings
Maximum
Potential
Collateral
Requirements
Maximum
Potential
Collateral
Requirements
(in millions)(in millions)
At BBB- and/or Baa3$87
$92
Below BBB- and/or Baa3$1,055
$1,106
Included in these amounts are certain agreements that could require collateral in the event that the Companyeither Georgia Power or Alabama Power (an affiliate of Georgia Power) has a credit rating change to below investment grade. Generally, collateral may be provided by a Southern Company guaranty, letter of credit, or cash. Additionally, a credit rating downgrade could impact the ability of the CompanyGeorgia Power to access capital markets and would be likely to impact the cost at which it does so.
On March 20, 2017,February 28, 2018, Fitch downgraded the senior unsecured long-term debt rating of Georgia Power to A from A+ with a negative outlook. On August 9, 2018, Fitch downgraded the senior unsecured long-term debt rating of Georgia Power to A- from A. On September 28, 2018, Fitch assigned a negative rating outlook to the ratings of Southern Company and certain of its subsidiaries (including Georgia Power).
On August 8, 2018, Moody's downgraded the senior unsecured debt rating of Georgia Power to Baa1 from A3. On September 28, 2018, Moody's revised its rating outlook for the CompanyGeorgia Power from stablenegative to negative.stable.
On March 24, 2017, S&P revised its consolidated credit rating outlook for Southern Company and its subsidiaries (including the Company) from stable to negative.
On March 30, 2017, Fitch placed the ratingsAs a result of the Company on rating watch negative.
While it is unclear how the credit rating agencies, the FERC, and the Georgia PSC may respond to the Tax Reform Legislation, certain financial metrics, such as the funds from operations to debt percentage, used by the credit rating agencies to assess Southern Company and its subsidiaries including the Company,(including Georgia Power) may be negatively impacted. Absent actionsThe Georgia Power Tax Reform Settlement Agreement approved by Southern Company and its subsidiaries, including the Company,Georgia PSC on April 3, 2018 is expected to help mitigate these potential adverse impacts to certain credit metrics by allowing a higher retail equity ratio until the resulting impacts, which, among other alternatives, could include adjusting capital structure and/or monetizing regulatory assets,conclusion of the Company's credit ratings could be negatively affected.Georgia Power 2019 Base Rate Case. See Note 32 to the financial statements under "Retail Regulatory Matters"Georgia Power – Rate Plans" for additional information.

MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS (continued)
Georgia Power Company 2017 Annual Report

Market Price Risk
Due to cost-based rate regulation and other various cost recovery mechanisms, the CompanyGeorgia Power continues to have limited exposure to market volatility in interest rates, commodity fuel prices, and prices of electricity. To manage the volatility attributable to these exposures, the CompanyGeorgia Power nets the exposures, where possible, to take advantage of natural offsets and enters into various

MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS (continued)
Georgia Power Company 2018 Annual Report

derivative transactions for the remaining exposures pursuant to the Company'sGeorgia Power's policies in areas such as counterparty exposure and risk management practices. The Company'sGeorgia Power's policy is that derivatives are to be used primarily for hedging purposes and mandates strict adherence to all applicable risk management policies. Derivative positions are monitored using techniques including, but not limited to, market valuation, value at risk, stress testing, and sensitivity analysis.
To mitigate future exposure to changes in interest rates, the CompanyGeorgia Power may enter into derivatives designated as hedges. The weighted average interest rate on $1.9$0.9 billion of long-term variable interest rate exposure at December 31, 20172018 was 2.66%2.57%. If the CompanyGeorgia Power sustained a 100 basis point change in interest rates for all long-term variable interest rate exposure, the change would affect annualized interest expense by approximately $19$9 million at December 31, 2017.2018. See Note 1 to the financial statements under "Financial Instruments" and Note 1114 to the financial statements for additional information.
To mitigate residual risks relative to movements in electricity prices, the CompanyGeorgia Power enters into physical fixed-price contracts for the purchase and sale of electricity through the wholesale electricity market and, to a lesser extent, financial hedge contracts for natural gas purchases. The CompanyGeorgia Power continues to manage a fuel-hedging program implemented per the guidelines of the Georgia PSC. The CompanyGeorgia Power had no material change in market risk exposure for the year ended December 31, 20172018 when compared to the December 31, 20162017 reporting period.
The changes in fair value of energy-related derivative contracts are substantially attributable to both the volume and the price of natural gas. For the years ended December 31, the changes in fair value of energy-related derivative contracts, the majority of which are composed of regulatory hedges, were as follows:
2017
Changes
 
2016
Changes
2018
Changes
 
2017
Changes
Fair ValueFair Value
(in millions)(in millions)
Contracts outstanding at the beginning of the period, assets (liabilities), net$36
 $(13)$(13) $36
Contracts realized or settled:      
Swaps realized or settled(13) (2)1
 (13)
Options realized or settled(1) 11

 (1)
Current period changes(*):
      
Swaps(28) 31
(3) (28)
Options(7) 9
1
 (7)
Contracts outstanding at the end of the period, assets (liabilities), net$(13) $36
$(14) $(13)
(*)Current period changes also include the changes in fair value of new contracts entered into during the period, if any.
The net hedge volumes of energy-related derivative contracts for the years endedat December 31, 2018 and 2017 were as follows:
2017 20162018 2017
mmBtu VolumemmBtu Volume
(in millions)(in millions)
Commodity – Natural gas swaps146
 128
141
 146
Commodity – Natural gas options17
 27
12
 17
Total hedge volume163
 155
153
 163
The weighted average swap contract cost above market prices was approximately $0.10 per mmBtu and $0.08 per mmBtu as ofat December 31, 2017. The weighted average swap contract cost below market prices was approximately $0.23 per mmBtu as of December 31, 2016.2018 and 2017, respectively. The change in option fair value is primarily attributable to the volatility of the market and the underlying change in the natural gas price. All natural gas hedge gains and losses are recovered through the Company'sGeorgia Power's fuel cost recovery mechanism.
At December 31, 20172018 and 2016,2017, substantially all of the Company'sGeorgia Power's energy-related derivative contracts were designated as regulatory hedges and were related to the Company'sGeorgia Power's fuel-hedging program, which had a time horizon up to 48 months. Hedging

MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS (continued)
Georgia Power Company 2017 Annual Report

gains and losses are initially recorded as regulatory liabilities and assets, respectively, and then are included in fuel expense as they are recovered through the fuel cost recovery mechanism. Gains and losses on energy-related derivative contracts that are not designated or fail to qualify as hedges are recognized in the statements of income as incurred and were not material for any year presented.
The

MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS (continued)
Georgia Power Company 2018 Annual Report

Georgia Power uses over-the-counter contracts that are not exchange traded but are fair valued using prices which are market observable, and thus fall into Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy. See Note 1013 to the financial statements for further discussion of fair value measurements. The maturities of the energy-related derivative contracts, which are all Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy, at December 31, 20172018 were as follows:
Fair Value Measurements
December 31, 2017
Fair Value Measurements
December 31, 2018
Total MaturityTotal Maturity
Fair Value Year 1 Years 2&3 Fair Value Year 1 Years 2&3 
(in millions)(in millions)
Level 1$
 $
 $
$
 $
 $
Level 2(13) (7) (6)(14) (6) (8)
Level 3
 
 

 
 
Fair value of contracts outstanding at end of period$(13) $(7) $(6)$(14) $(6) $(8)
The CompanyGeorgia Power is exposed to market price risk in the event of nonperformance by counterparties to the energy-related and interest rate derivative contracts. The CompanyGeorgia Power only enters into agreements and material transactions with counterparties that have investment grade credit ratings by Moody's and S&P or with counterparties who have posted collateral to cover potential credit exposure. Therefore, the CompanyGeorgia Power does not anticipate market risk exposure from nonperformance by the counterparties. For additional information, see Note 1 to the financial statements under "Financial Instruments" and Note 1114 to the financial statements.
Capital Requirements and Contractual Obligations
The construction program of the CompanyGeorgia Power is currently estimated to total $3.3 billion for 2018, $3.2$3.7 billion for 2019, $2.7$3.5 billion for 2020, $2.4$3.4 billion for 2021, and $2.2$3.4 billion for 2022.2022, and $2.9 billion for 2023. These amounts include expenditures of approximately $1.5 billion, $1.2 billion, $1.0 billion, $0.9 billion, $0.7 billion, and $0.4$0.5 billion for the construction of Plant Vogtle Units 3 and 4 in 2018, 2019, 2020, 2021, and 2022, respectively. These amounts also include capital expenditures related to contractual purchase commitments for nuclear fuel and capital expenditures covered under LTSAs. Estimated capital expenditures to comply with environmental laws and regulations included in these amounts are $0.5$0.2 billion, $0.1 billion, $0.1 billion, $0.2 billion, $0.2and $0.1 billion and $0.2 billion for 2018, 2019, 2020, 2021, 2022, and 2022,2023, respectively. These estimated expenditures do not include any potential compliance costs associated with thepending regulation of CO2 emissions from fossil fuel-fired electric generating units. See FUTURE EARNINGS POTENTIAL – "Environmental Matters – Environmental Laws and Regulations" and "–" – Global Climate Issues" herein for additional information.
The CompanyGeorgia Power also anticipates costs associated with closure and monitoring of ash ponds and landfills in accordance with the CCR Rule, which are reflected in the Company'sGeorgia Power's ARO liabilities. In December 2018, Georgia Power recorded an increase of approximately $3.1 billion to its AROs related to the CCR Rule and the related state rule. These costs, which are expected to change and could change materially as the Company continues to refine itsunderlying assumptions underlyingare refined and the cost estimates and evaluate the method and timing of compliance activities continue to be evaluated, are currently estimated to be $0.2 billion per year for 2018 through 2020 and2019, $0.3 billion per yearfor 2020, $0.4 billion for 2021, $0.7 billion for 2022, and 2022.$0.6 billion for 2023. See FUTURE EARNINGS POTENTIAL – "Environmental Matters – Environmental Laws and Regulations – Coal Combustion Residuals" and Note 16 to the financial statements under "Asset Retirement Obligations and Other Costs of Removal" for additional information.
The construction program is subject to periodic review and revision, and actual construction costs may vary from these estimates because of numerous factors. These factors include: changes in business conditions; changes in load projections; changes in environmental laws and regulations; the outcome of any legal challenges to environmental rules; changes in generating plants, including unit retirements and replacements and adding or changing fuel sources at existing generating units, to meet regulatory requirements; changes in FERC rules and regulations; Georgia PSC approvals; changes in the expected environmental compliance program; changes in legislation; the cost and efficiency of construction labor, equipment, and materials; project scope and design changes; storm impacts; and the cost of capital. In addition, there can be no assurance that costs related to capital expenditures will be fully recovered. The construction program also includes Plant Vogtle Units 3 and 4, which includes components based on new technology that only recently began initial operation in the global nuclear industry at this scale and which may be subject to additional revised cost estimates during construction. The ability to control costs and avoid cost and schedule overruns during the development, construction, and operation of new facilities is subject to a number of factors, including, but not limited to, changes in labor costs, availability, and productivity,productivity; challenges with management of contractors, subcontractors, or vendors; adverse weather conditions,conditions; shortages, andincreased costs, or inconsistent quality of equipment, materials, and labor,labor; contractor or supplier delay, non-performance under construction, operating, or other agreements, operational readiness, including specialized operator
    Table of Contents                                Index to Financial Statements

MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS (continued)
Georgia Power Company 20172018 Annual Report

delay; non-performance under construction, operating, or other agreements; operational readiness, including specialized operator training and required site safety programs, unforeseenprograms; engineering or design problems,problems; design and other licensing-based compliance matters, including the timely resolution of ITAAC and the related approvals by the NRC; challenges with start-up activities, (includingincluding major equipment failure and system integration),integration; and/or operational performance. See Note 32 to the financial statements under "Retail Regulatory Matters"Georgia Power – Nuclear Construction" for information regarding additional factors that may impact construction expenditures.
As a result of requirements by the NRC, the CompanyGeorgia Power has established external trust funds for nuclear decommissioning costs. For additional information, see Note 16 to the financial statements under "Nuclear Decommissioning."
In addition, as discussed in Note 211 to the financial statements, the CompanyGeorgia Power provides postretirement benefits to substantially all employees and funds trusts to the extent required by the Georgia PSC and the FERC.
Other fundingFunding requirements related to obligations associated with scheduled maturities of long-term debt, as well as the related interest, derivative obligations, leases, other purchase commitments, ARO settlements, and trusts are detailed in the contractual obligations table that follows. See Notes 1, 2, 6, 7,8, 9, 11, and 1114 to the financial statements for additional information.
    Table of Contents                                Index to Financial Statements

MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS (continued)
Georgia Power Company 20172018 Annual Report

Contractual Obligations
Contractual obligations at December 31, 20172018 were as follows:
2018 2019- 2020 2021- 2022 
After
2022
 Total2019 2020- 2021 2022- 2023 
After
2023
 Total
(in millions)(in millions)
Long-term debt(a)
                  
Principal$850
 $1,494
 $879
 $8,693
 $11,916
$608
 $1,363
 $641
 $7,343
 $9,955
Interest419
 760
 688
 5,786
 7,653
339
 615
 562
 4,660
 6,176
Financial derivative obligations(b)
10
 10
 
 
 20
8
 12
 
 
 20
Operating leases(c)
24
 42
 31
 44
 141
23
 27
 11
 13
 74
Capital leases(c)
9
 16
 
 
 25
9
 7
 
 
 16
Purchase commitments —                  
Capital(d)
3,080
 5,508
 4,006
 
 12,594
3,512
 6,305
 5,876
   15,693
Fuel(e)
1,238
 1,245
 818
 5,075
 8,376
1,117
 1,400
 764
 4,586
 7,867
Purchased power(f)
318
 545
 549
 2,352
 3,764
270
 536
 549
 2,054
 3,409
Other(g)
50
 198
 70
 297
 615
42
 179
 109
 267
 597
ARO settlements(h)
202
 674
 1,283
   2,159
Trusts —                  
Nuclear decommissioning(h)
5
 11
 11
 94
 121
Pension and other postretirement benefit plans(i)
47
 87
     134
Nuclear decommissioning(i)
5
 11
 11
 88
 115
Pension and other postretirement benefit plans(j)
43
 79
     122
Total$6,050
 $9,916
 $7,052
 $22,341
 $45,359
$6,178
 $11,208
 $9,806
 $19,011
 $46,203
(a)All amounts are reflected based on final maturity dates except for amounts related to FFB borrowings.borrowings and certain pollution control revenue bonds. As it relates to the FFB borrowings, the final maturity date is February 20, 2044; however, principal amortization is reflected beginning in 2020. See Note 68 to the financial statements under "DOE"Long-term Debt – DOE Loan Guarantee Borrowings" for additional information. The CompanyGeorgia Power plans to continue, when economically feasible, to retire higher-cost securities and replace these obligations with lower-cost capital if market conditions permit. Variable rate interest obligations are estimated based on rates as ofat December 31, 2017,2018, as reflected in the statements of capitalization. Fixed rates include, where applicable, the effects of interest rate derivatives employed to manage interest rate risk. Long-term debt excludes capital lease amounts (shown separately).
(b)See Notes 1 and 1114 to the financial statements.
(c)Excludes PPAs that are accounted for as leases and included in "Purchased power." See Note 78 to the financial statements under "Long-term Debt – Capital Leases – Georgia Power" and Note 9 to the financial statements under "Operating Leases" for additional information.
(d)The CompanyGeorgia Power provides estimated capital expenditures for a five-year period, including capital expenditures associated with environmental regulations. These amounts exclude contractual purchase commitments for nuclear fuel, and capital expenditures covered under LTSAs, and estimated capital expenditures for AROs, which are reflected in "Fuel""Fuel," "Other," and "Other,"ARO settlements," respectively. At December 31, 2017,2018, significant purchase commitments were outstanding in connection with the construction program. See FUTURE EARNINGS POTENTIAL – "Environmental Matters – Environmental Laws and Regulations" and "Retail Regulatory Matters – Nuclear Construction" herein for additional information.
(e)Includes commitments to purchase coal, nuclear fuel, and natural gas, as well as the related transportation and storage. In most cases, these contracts contain provisions for price escalation, minimum purchase levels, and other financial commitments. Natural gas purchase commitments are based on various indices at the time of delivery. Amounts reflected for natural gas purchase commitments have been estimated based on the New York Mercantile ExchangeNYMEX future prices at December 31, 2017.2018.
(f)
Estimated minimum long-term obligations for various PPA purchases from gas-fired, biomass, and wind-powered facilities.facilities and capacity payments related to Plant Vogtle Units 1 and 2. See Note 9 to the financial statements under "Fuel and Power Purchase Agreements" for additional information.
(g)Includes LTSAs and contracts for the procurement of limestone. LTSAs include price escalation based on inflation indices.
(h)Represents estimated costs for a five-year period associated with closing and monitoring ash ponds and landfills in accordance with the CCR Rule and the related state rule, which are reflected in Georgia Power's AROs. Material expenditures in future years for ARO settlements also will be required for ash ponds, nuclear decommissioning, and other liabilities and are reflected in Georgia Power's AROs. See FUTURE EARNINGS POTENTIAL – "Environmental Matters – Environmental Laws and Regulations – Coal Combustion Residuals" herein and Note 6 to the financial statements for additional information.
(i)
Projections of nuclear decommissioning trust fund contributions for Plant Hatch and Plant Vogtle Units 1 and 2 are based on the 2013 ARP. See Note 16 to the financial statements under "Nuclear Decommissioning" for additional information.
(i)(j)The CompanyGeorgia Power forecasts contributions to the pension and other postretirement benefit plans over a three-year period. The CompanyGeorgia Power anticipates no mandatory contributions to the qualified pension plan during the next three years. Amounts presented represent estimated benefit payments for the nonqualified pension plans, estimated non-trust benefit payments for the other postretirement benefit plans, and estimated contributions to the other postretirement benefit plan trusts, all of which will be made from the Company'sGeorgia Power's corporate assets. See Note 211 to the financial statements for additional information related to the pension and other postretirement benefit plans, including estimated benefit payments. Certain benefit payments will be made through the related benefit plans. Other benefit payments will be made from the Company'sGeorgia Power's corporate assets.
    Table of Contents                                Index to Financial Statements

MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS (continued)OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
GeorgiaMississippi Power Company 2018 Annual Report



OVERVIEW
Business Activities
Mississippi Power operates as a vertically integrated utility providing electric service to retail customers within its traditional service territory located within the State of Mississippi and to wholesale customers in the Southeast.
Many factors affect the opportunities, challenges, and risks of Mississippi Power's business of providing electric service. These factors include Mississippi Power's ability to maintain and grow energy sales and to operate in a constructive regulatory environment that provides timely recovery of prudently-incurred costs. These costs include those related to reliability, fuel, and stringent environmental standards, as well as ongoing capital and operations and maintenance expenditures and restoration following major storms. Appropriately balancing required costs and capital expenditures with customer prices will continue to challenge Mississippi Power for the foreseeable future. Mississippi Power is scheduled to file a base rate case in the fourth quarter 2019 (Mississippi Power 2019 Base Rate Case).
As a result of the Mississippi PSC's stated intent to issue an order establishing a new docket for a global settlement under which the Kemper County energy facility would be operated as a natural gas plant, rather than an IGCC plant (Kemper Settlement Docket), on June 28, 2017, Mississippi Power notified the Mississippi PSC that it would begin a process to suspend operations and start-up activities on the gasifier portion of the Kemper County energy facility. At the time of project suspension, the total cost estimate for the Kemper County energy facility was approximately $7.38 billion, including approximately $5.95 billion of costs subject to the construction cost cap. In the aggregate, Mississippi Power had incurred charges of $3.07 billion ($1.89 billion after tax) for changes in the cost estimate above the cost cap through May 31, 2017.
Given the Mississippi PSC's stated intent regarding no additional rate increases for the Kemper County energy facility and the subsequent suspension of construction, cost recovery of the gasification portions was no longer probable. Therefore, Mississippi Power recorded a charge to income in June 2017 of $2.8 billion ($2.0 billion after tax) for the estimated costs associated with the gasification portions of the plant and lignite mine. During the third and fourth quarters 2017, Mississippi Power recorded further charges to income totaling $242 million ($206 million after tax), including $164 million for ongoing project costs, estimated mine and gasifier-related costs, and certain termination costs during the suspension period prior to conclusion of the Kemper Settlement Docket, as well as a charge associated with the Kemper Settlement Agreement discussed below.
On February 6, 2018, the Mississippi PSC voted to approve a settlement agreement related to cost recovery for the Kemper County energy facility among Mississippi Power, the MPUS, and certain intervenors (Kemper Settlement Agreement), which resolved all cost recovery issues, modified the CPCN to limit the Kemper County energy facility to natural gas combined cycle operation, and provided for an annual revenue requirement of approximately $99.3 million for costs related to the Kemper County energy facility, which included the impact of the Tax Reform Legislation. The revenue requirement is based on (i) a fixed ROE for 2018 of 8.6% excluding any performance adjustment, (ii) a ROE for 2019 calculated in accordance with PEP, excluding the performance adjustment, (iii) for future years, a performance-based ROE calculated pursuant to PEP, and (iv) amortization periods for the related regulatory assets and liabilities of eight years and six years, respectively. The revenue requirement also reflects a disallowance related to a portion of Mississippi Power's investment in the Kemper County energy facility requested for inclusion in rate base, which was recorded in the fourth quarter 2017 as an additional charge to income of approximately $78 million ($85 million net of accumulated depreciation of $7 million) pre-tax ($48 million after tax). Under the Kemper Settlement Agreement, retail customer rates reflect a reduction of approximately $26.8 million annually, effective with the first billing cycle of April 2018, and include no recovery for costs associated with the gasifier portion of the Kemper County energy facility in 2018 or at any future date.
In 2018, Mississippi Power recorded pre-tax charges to income of $37 million ($27 million after tax), primarily resulting from the abandonment and related closure activities and ongoing period costs, net of sales proceeds, for the mine and gasifier-related assets at the Kemper County energy facility. In addition, Mississippi Power recorded a credit to earnings of $95 million in the fourth quarter 2018 primarily resulting from the reduction of a valuation allowance for a state income tax net operating loss (NOL) carryforward associated with the Kemper County energy facility. Additional closure costs for the mine and gasifier-related assets, currently estimated at up to $10 million pre-tax (excluding salvage, net of dismantlement costs), may be incurred through the first half of 2020. In addition, period costs, including, but not limited to, costs for compliance and safety, ARO accretion, and property taxes for the mine and gasifier-related assets, are estimated to total $11 million in 2019 and $2 million to $4 million annually in 2020 through 2023. Mississippi Power is currently evaluating its options regarding the final disposition of the CO2 pipeline, including removal of the pipeline. This evaluation is expected to be complete later in 2019. If Mississippi Power ultimately decides to remove the CO2 pipeline, the cost of removal would have a material impact on Mississippi Power's financial statements. The ultimate outcome of these matters cannot be determined at this time.
Table of Contents             ��                  Index to Financial Statements

MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS (continued)
Mississippi Power Company 2018 Annual Report

Cautionary Statement Regarding Forward-LookingSee Note 2 to the financial statements under "Kemper County Energy Facility" and Note 10 to the financial statements for additional information.
On August 7, 2018 the Mississippi PSC approved settlement agreements between Mississippi Power and the MPUS with respect to the 2018 PEP filing and all unresolved PEP filings for prior years (PEP Settlement Agreement) and the 2018 ECO Plan filing (ECO Settlement Agreement). Rates under the PEP Settlement Agreement and the ECO Settlement Agreement resulted in annual revenue increases of approximately $21.6 million and $17 million, respectively, effective with the first billing cycle of September 2018 and are expected to continue through the conclusion of the Mississippi Power 2019 Base Rate Case.
In August 2018, the Mississippi PSC began an operations review of Mississippi Power, for which the final report is expected prior to the conclusion of the Mississippi Power 2019 Base Rate Case. Mississippi Power expects that the review will include, but not be limited to, a comparative analysis of its costs, its cost recovery framework, and ways in which it may streamline management operations for the reasonable benefit of ratepayers. The ultimate outcome of this matter cannot be determined at this time.
See FUTURE EARNINGS POTENTIAL – "Retail Regulatory Matters" herein and Note 2 to the financial statements under "Mississippi Power" for additional information.
Mississippi Power continues to focus on several key performance indicators. In recognition that Mississippi Power's long-term financial success is dependent upon how well it satisfies its customers' needs, Mississippi Power's retail base rate mechanism, PEP, includes performance indicators that directly tie customer service indicators to Mississippi Power's allowed ROE. PEP measures Mississippi Power's performance on a 10-point scale as a weighted average of results in three areas: average customer price, as compared to prices of other regional utilities (weighted at 40%); service reliability, measured in percentage of time customers had electric service (40%); and customer satisfaction, measured in a survey of residential customers (20%). Mississippi Power also focuses on broader measures of customer satisfaction, plant availability, system reliability, and net income.
Mississippi Power's financial success is directly tied to customer satisfaction. Key elements of ensuring customer satisfaction include outstanding service, high reliability, and competitive prices. Management uses customer satisfaction surveys to evaluate Mississippi Power's results and generally targets top-quartile performance.
See RESULTS OF OPERATIONS herein for information on Mississippi Power's financial performance.
Earnings
Mississippi Power's net income after dividends on preferred stock was $235 million in 2018 compared to a $2.59 billion net loss in 2017 and a $50 million net loss in 2016. The changes were primarily the result of pre-tax charges associated with the Kemper IGCC of $37 million, $3.36 billion, and $428 million, in 2018, 2017, and 2016, respectively. The increase in net income in 2018 was partially offset by lower tax benefits and a decrease in AFUDC. See Note 2 to the financial statements under "Kemper County Energy Facility" for additional information.
The Company's 2017
MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS (continued)
Mississippi Power Company 2018 Annual Report contains forward-looking statements. Forward-looking statements include, among other things, statements concerning regulated rates, customer

RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
A condensed statement of operations follows:
 Amount 
Increase (Decrease)
from Prior Year
 2018 2018 2017
 (in millions)
Operating revenues$1,265
 $78
 $24
Fuel405
 10
 52
Purchased power41
 16
 (9)
Other operations and maintenance313
 22
 (26)
Depreciation and amortization169
 8
 29
Taxes other than income taxes107
 3
 (5)
Estimated loss on Kemper IGCC37
 (3,325) 2,934
Total operating expenses1,072
 (3,266) 2,975
Operating income193
 3,344
 (2,951)
Allowance for equity funds used during construction
 (72) (52)
Interest expense, net of amounts capitalized76
 34
 (32)
Other income (expense), net17
 16
 3
Income taxes (benefit)(102) 430
 (428)
Net income236
 2,824
 (2,540)
Dividends on preferred stock1
 (1) 
Net income after dividends on preferred stock$235
 $2,825
 $(2,540)
Operating Revenues
Operating revenues for 2018 were $1.3 billion, reflecting a $78 million increase from 2017. Details of operating revenues were as follows:
 2018 2017
 (in millions)
Retail — prior year$854
 $859
Estimated change resulting from —   
Rates and pricing24
 (7)
Sales growth4
 4
Weather12
 (15)
Fuel and other cost recovery(5) 13
Retail — current year889
 854
Wholesale revenues —   
Non-affiliates263
 259
Affiliates91
 56
Total wholesale revenues354
 315
Other operating revenues22
 18
Total operating revenues$1,265
 $1,187
Percent change6.6% 2.1%
Total retail revenues for 2018 increased $35 million, or 4.1%, compared to 2017 primarily due to the PEP and sales growth, economic conditions, fuel and environmental cost recovery and otherECO Plan rate actions, current and proposed environmental regulations and related compliance plans and estimated expenditures, pending or potential litigation matters, access to sources of capital, projectionschanges that became effective for the qualified pension plan, postretirement benefit plans, and nuclear decommissioning trust fund contributions, financing activities, completion datesfirst billing cycle of construction projects, filings with state and federal regulatory authorities, impactsSeptember 2018, each resulting in retail revenue increases of $12 million. In addition, as a result of the Tax Reform Legislation, federal income tax benefits, estimated sales and purchases under power sale and purchase agreements, and estimated construction and other plans and expenditures. In some cases, forward-looking statements can be identified by terminology such as "may," "will," "could," "should," "expects," "plans," "anticipates," "believes," "estimates," "projects," "predicts," "potential," or "continue" or the negativePEP Settlement Agreement, Mississippi Power recognized revenues of these terms or other similar terminology. There are various factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from those suggested by the forward-looking statements; accordingly, there can be no assurance that such indicated results will be realized. These factors include:
the impact of recent and future federal and state regulatory changes, including environmental laws and regulations governing air, water, land, and protection of other natural resources, and also changes in tax and other laws and regulations to which the Company is subject, as well as changes in application of existing laws and regulations;
the uncertainty surrounding the recently enacted Tax Reform Legislation, including implementing regulations and IRS interpretations, actions that may be taken in response by regulatory authorities, and its impact, if any, on the credit ratings of the Company;
current and future litigation or regulatory investigations, proceedings, or inquiries;
the effects, extent, and timing of the entry of additional competition in the markets in which the Company operates;
variations in demand for electricity, including those relating to weather, the general economy, population and business growth (and declines), the effects of energy conservation and efficiency measures, including from the development and deployment of alternative energy sources such as self-generation and distributed generation technologies, and any potential economic impacts resulting from federal fiscal decisions;
available sources and costs of fuels;
effects of inflation;
the ability to control costs and avoid cost overruns during the development, construction, and operation of facilities, which include the development and construction of generating facilities with designs that have not been$5 million previously constructed, including changes in labor costs and productivity, adverse weather conditions, shortages and inconsistent quality of equipment, materials, and labor, contractor or supplier delay, non-performance under construction, operating, or other agreements, operational readiness, including specialized operator training and required site safety programs, unforeseen engineering or design problems, start-up activities (including major equipment failure and system integration), and/or operational performance;
the ability to construct facilities in accordance with the requirements of permits and licenses (including satisfaction of NRC requirements), to satisfy any environmental performance standards and the requirements of tax credits and other incentives, and to integrate facilities into the Southern Company system upon completion of construction;
investment performance of the Company's employee and retiree benefit plans and nuclear decommissioning trust funds;
advances in technology;
state and federal rate regulations and the impact of pending and future rate cases and negotiations, including rate cases related to fuel and other cost recovery mechanisms;
the ability to successfully operate generating, transmission, and distribution facilities and the successful performance of necessary corporate functions;
legal proceedings and regulatory approvals and actions related to Plant Vogtle Units 3 and 4, including Georgia PSC approvals and NRC actions;
the inherent risks involved in operating and constructing nuclear generating facilities, including environmental, health, regulatory, natural disaster, terrorism, and financial risks;
internal restructuring or other restructuring options that may be pursued;
potential business strategies, including acquisitions or dispositions of assets or businesses, which cannot be assured to be completed or beneficial to the Company;
the ability of counterparties of the Company to make payments as and when due and to perform as required;
    Table of Contents                                Index to Financial Statements

MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS (continued)
GeorgiaMississippi Power Company 20172018 Annual Report

reserved in connection with the ability2012 PEP lookback filing and deferred $17 million of revenue in 2017 following the complete amortization of certain regulatory assets related to obtain new short- and long-term contracts with wholesale customers;
the direct or indirect effect onKemper County energy facility. These increases were offset by a decrease of $16 million annually for base rates related to the Company's business resulting from cyber intrusion or physical attackKemper County energy facility that became effective for the first billing cycle of April 2018 and the threatrecognition in 2018 of physical attacks;regulatory liabilities of $5 million and $2 million, respectively, related to the equity ratio provisions of the PEP and ECO Settlement Agreements. Additionally, there was a $12 million increase as a result of colder weather in the first quarter and warmer weather in the second and third quarters in 2018 as compared to the corresponding periods in 2017 and a $5 million decrease in fuel and other cost recovery.
interest rate fluctuations and financial market conditionsTotal retail revenues for 2017 decreased $5 million, or 0.6%, compared to 2016 primarily due to a $15 million decrease as a result of milder weather in 2017 as compared to 2016 and the resultsdeferral of financing efforts;
$17 million of revenue following the complete amortization of certain regulatory assets related to the Kemper County energy facility in July 2017. These decreases were partially offset by a $10 million net increase related to ECO Plan rate changes in the Company's credit ratings, including impacts on interest rates, access to capital markets, and collateral requirements;
the impacts of any sovereign financial issues, including impacts on interest rates, access to capital markets, impacts on foreign currency exchange rates, counterparty performance,third quarter 2016 and the economysecond quarter 2017 and an increase of $13 million in general,fuel cost recovery.
See Note 2 to the financial statements under "Mississippi Power – Environmental Compliance Overview Plan," " – Performance Evaluation Plan," and " – Kemper County Energy Facility – Rate Recovery" for additional information. See "Energy Sales" below for a discussion of changes in the volume of energy sold, including changes related to sales and weather.
Electric rates for Mississippi Power include provisions to adjust billings for fluctuations in fuel costs, including the energy component of purchased power costs. Under these provisions, fuel revenues generally equal fuel expenses, including the energy component of purchased power costs, and do not affect net income. Recoverable fuel costs include fuel and purchased power expenses reduced by the fuel and emissions portion of wholesale revenues from energy sold to customers outside Mississippi Power's service territory. See FUTURE EARNINGS POTENTIAL – "Retail Regulatory Matters – Fuel Cost Recovery" herein for additional information.
Wholesale revenues from power sales to non-affiliated utilities, including FERC-regulated MRA sales as well as potential impacts on the benefits of the DOE loan guarantees;
the ability of the Company to obtain additional generating capacity (or sell excess generating capacity) at competitive prices;
catastrophic events suchmarket-based sales, were as fires, earthquakes, explosions, floods, tornadoes, hurricanes and other storms, droughts, pandemic health events such as influenzas, or other similar occurrences;
the direct or indirect effects on the Company's business resulting from incidents affecting the U.S. electric grid or operation of generating resources;
the effect of accounting pronouncements issued periodically by standard-setting bodies; and
other factors discussed elsewhere herein and in other reports filed by the Company from time to time with the SEC.
The Company expressly disclaims any obligation to update any forward-looking statements.

STATEMENTS OF INCOME
For the Years Ended December 31, 2017, 2016, and 2015
Georgia Power Company 2017 Annual Report
follows:
 2017
 2016
 2015
 (in millions)
Operating Revenues:     
Retail revenues$7,738
 $7,772
 $7,727
Wholesale revenues, non-affiliates163
 175
 215
Wholesale revenues, affiliates26
 42
 20
Other revenues383
 394
 364
Total operating revenues8,310
 8,383
 8,326
Operating Expenses:     
Fuel1,671
 1,807
 2,033
Purchased power, non-affiliates416
 361
 289
Purchased power, affiliates622
 518
 575
Other operations and maintenance1,653
 1,960
 1,844
Depreciation and amortization895
 855
 846
Taxes other than income taxes409
 405
 391
Total operating expenses5,666
 5,906
 5,978
Operating Income2,644
 2,477
 2,348
Other Income and (Expense):     
Interest expense, net of amounts capitalized(419) (388) (363)
Other income (expense), net33
 38
 61
Total other income and (expense)(386) (350) (302)
Earnings Before Income Taxes2,258
 2,127
 2,046
Income taxes830
 780
 769
Net Income1,428
 1,347
 1,277
Dividends on Preferred and Preference Stock14
 17
 17
Net Income After Dividends on Preferred and Preference Stock$1,414
 $1,330
 $1,260
 2018 2017 2016
 (in millions)
Capacity and other$6
 $15
 $16
Energy257
 244
 245
Total non-affiliated$263
 $259
 $261
The accompanying notes are an integral partWholesale revenues from sales to non-affiliates will vary depending on fuel prices, the market prices of these financial statements.

STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME
For the Years Ended December 31, 2017, 2016, and 2015
Georgia Power Company 2017 Annual Report
 2017
 2016
 2015
 (in millions)
Net Income$1,428
 $1,347
 $1,277
Other comprehensive income (loss):     
Qualifying hedges:     
Changes in fair value, net of tax of $-, $-, and $(6),
respectively

 
 (9)
Reclassification adjustment for amounts included in net income,
net of tax of $1, $2, and $1, respectively
3
 2
 2
Total other comprehensive income (loss)3
 2
 (7)
Comprehensive Income$1,431
 $1,349
 $1,270
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
For the Years Ended December 31, 2017, 2016, and 2015
Georgia Power Company 2017 Annual Report
 2017
 2016
 2015
 (in millions)
Operating Activities:     
Net income$1,428
 $1,347
 $1,277
Adjustments to reconcile net income
to net cash provided from operating activities —
     
Depreciation and amortization, total1,100
 1,063
 1,029
Deferred income taxes458
 383
 173
Retail fuel cost over recovery — long-term
 
 106
Pension, postretirement, and other employee benefits(68) (33) 40
Pension and postretirement funding
 (287) (7)
Settlement of asset retirement obligations(120) (123) (29)
Other deferred charges — affiliated
 (111) 
Other, net(83) (25) (70)
Changes in certain current assets and liabilities —     
-Receivables(256) 60
 187
-Fossil fuel stock(16) 104
 37
-Prepaid income taxes(168) 
 89
-Other current assets(28) (38) (62)
-Accounts payable(219) (42) (259)
-Accrued taxes1
 131
 25
-Retail fuel cost over recovery(84) (32) 10
-Other current liabilities(33) 28
 (29)
Net cash provided from operating activities1,912
 2,425
 2,517
Investing Activities:     
Property additions(2,704) (2,223) (2,091)
Proceeds pursuant to the Toshiba Guarantee, net of joint owner portion
              
1,682
 
 
Nuclear decommissioning trust fund purchases(574) (808) (985)
Nuclear decommissioning trust fund sales568
 803
 980
Cost of removal, net of salvage(100) (83) (71)
Change in construction payables, net of joint owner portion223
 (35) 217
Payments pursuant to LTSAs(64) (34) (66)
Sale of property96
 10
 70
Other investing activities(39) 23
 2
Net cash used for investing activities(912) (2,347) (1,944)
Financing Activities:     
Increase (decrease) in notes payable, net(391) 234
 2
Proceeds —     
Senior notes1,350
 650
 500
FFB loan
 425
 1,000
Pollution control revenue bonds issuances and remarketings65
 
 409
Capital contributions from parent company431
 594
 62
Short-term borrowings700
 
 250
Other long-term debt370
 
 
Redemptions and repurchases —     
Senior notes(450) (700) (1,175)
Preferred and preference stock(270) 
 
Pollution control revenue bonds(65) (4) (268)
Short-term borrowings(550) 
 (250)
Payment of common stock dividends(1,281) (1,305) (1,034)
Other financing activities(60) (36) (26)
Net cash used for financing activities(151) (142) (530)
Net Change in Cash and Cash Equivalents849
 (64) 43
Cash and Cash Equivalents at Beginning of Year3
 67
 24
Cash and Cash Equivalents at End of Year$852
 $3
 $67
Supplemental Cash Flow Information:     
Cash paid during the period for —     
Interest (net of $23, $20, and $16 capitalized, respectively)$386
 $375
 $353
Income taxes (net of refunds)496
 170
 506
Noncash transactions —     
Accrued property additions at year-end550
 336
 387
Capital lease obligation
 
 149
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

BALANCE SHEETS
At December 31, 2017 and 2016
Georgia Power Company 2017 Annual Report
Assets2017
 2016
 (in millions)
Current Assets:   
Cash and cash equivalents$852
 $3
Receivables —   
Customer accounts receivable708
 523
Unbilled revenues255
 224
Joint owner accounts receivable262
 57
Affiliated24
 18
Other accounts and notes receivable76
 81
Accumulated provision for uncollectible accounts(3) (3)
Fossil fuel stock314
 298
Materials and supplies504
 479
Prepaid expenses216
 105
Other regulatory assets, current205
 193
Other current assets15
 38
Total current assets3,428
 2,016
Property, Plant, and Equipment:   
In service34,861
 33,841
Less: Accumulated provision for depreciation11,704
 11,317
Plant in service, net of depreciation23,157
 22,524
Nuclear fuel, at amortized cost544
 569
Construction work in progress4,613
 4,939
Total property, plant, and equipment28,314
 28,032
Other Property and Investments:   
Equity investments in unconsolidated subsidiaries53
 60
Nuclear decommissioning trusts, at fair value929
 814
Miscellaneous property and investments59
 46
Total other property and investments1,041
 920
Deferred Charges and Other Assets:   
Deferred charges related to income taxes516
 676
Other regulatory assets, deferred2,932
 2,774
Other deferred charges and assets548
 417
Total deferred charges and other assets3,996
 3,867
Total Assets$36,779
 $34,835
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.


BALANCE SHEETS
At December 31, 2017 and 2016
Georgia Power Company 2017 Annual Report
Liabilities and Stockholder's Equity2017
 2016
 (in millions)
Current Liabilities:   
Securities due within one year$857
 $460
Notes payable150
 391
Accounts payable —   
Affiliated493
 438
Other834
 589
Customer deposits270
 265
Accrued taxes —   
Accrued income taxes
 17
Other accrued taxes344
 390
Accrued interest123
 106
Accrued compensation219
 224
Asset retirement obligations, current270
 299
Other regulatory liabilities, current191
 31
Over recovered fuel clause revenues, current
 84
Other current liabilities198
 182
Total current liabilities3,949
 3,476
Long-Term Debt (See accompanying statements)
11,073
 10,225
Deferred Credits and Other Liabilities:   
Accumulated deferred income taxes3,175
 6,000
Deferred credits related to income taxes3,248
 121
Accumulated deferred ITCs248
 256
Employee benefit obligations659
 703
Asset retirement obligations, deferred2,368
 2,233
Other deferred credits and liabilities128
 199
Total deferred credits and other liabilities9,826
 9,512
Total Liabilities24,848
 23,213
Preferred Stock (See accompanying statements)

 45
Preference Stock (See accompanying statements)

 221
Common Stockholder's Equity (See accompanying statements)
11,931
 11,356
Total Liabilities and Stockholder's Equity$36,779
 $34,835
Commitments and Contingent Matters (See notes)

 
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

STATEMENTS OF CAPITALIZATION
At December 31, 2017 and 2016
Georgia Power Company 2017 Annual Report
 2017
 2016
 2017
 2016
 (in millions) (percent of total)
Long-Term Debt:       
Long-term notes payable —       
5.70% due 2017$
 $450
    
1.95% to 5.40% due 2018747
 748
    
4.25% due 2019499
 500
    
2.00% due 2020950
 
    
2.40% due 2021325
 325
    
2.85% due 2022400
 400
    
3.25% to 5.95% due 2023-20434,175
 3,775
    
Variable rate (2.29% at 12/31/17) due 2018100
 
    
Total long-term notes payable7,196
 6,198
    
Other long-term debt —       
Pollution control revenue bonds —       
2.35% due 202253
 53
    
1.38% to 4.00% due 2025-2049940
 900
    
Variable rate (1.84% at 12/31/17) due 202213
 13
    
Variable rates (1.59% to 1.88% at 12/31/17) due 2026-2053815
 854
    
FFB loans —       
2.57% to 3.86% due 202044
 44
    
2.57% to 3.86% due 202144
 44
    
2.57% to 3.86% due 202244
 44
    
2.57% to 3.86% due 2023-20442,493
 2,493
    
Junior subordinated note (5.00%) due 2077270
 
    
Total other long-term debt4,716
 4,445
    
Capitalized lease obligations154
 169
    
Unamortized debt premium (discount), net(12) (10)    
Unamortized debt issuance expense(124) (117)    
Total long-term debt (annual interest requirement — $437 million)11,930
 10,685
    
Less amount due within one year857
 460
    
Long-term debt excluding amount due within one year11,073
 10,225
 48.1% 46.8%
Preferred and Preference Stock:       
Non-cumulative preferred stock       
$25 par value — 6.125%       
Authorized — 50,000,000 shares       
Outstanding — 2017: no shares       
                     — 2016: 1,800,000 shares
 45
    
Non-cumulative preference stock       
$100 par value — 6.50%       
Authorized — 15,000,000 shares       
Outstanding — 2017: no shares       
                     — 2016: 2,250,000 shares
 221
    
Total preferred and preference stock
 266
 
 1.2
Common Stockholder's Equity:       
Common stock, without par value —       
Authorized — 20,000,000 shares       
Outstanding — 9,261,500 shares398
 398
    
Paid-in capital7,328
 6,885
    
Retained earnings4,215
 4,086
    
Accumulated other comprehensive loss(10) (13)    
Total common stockholder's equity11,931
 11,356
 51.9
 52.0
Total Capitalization$23,004
 $21,847
 100.0% 100.0%
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

STATEMENTS OF COMMON STOCKHOLDER'S EQUITY
For the Years Ended December 31, 2017, 2016, and 2015
Georgia Power Company 2017 Annual Report
 Number of Common Shares Issued Common Stock Paid-In Capital Retained Earnings Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss) Total
 (in millions)
Balance at December 31, 20149
 $398
 $6,196
 $3,835
 $(8) $10,421
Net income after dividends on preferred
and preference stock

 
 
 1,260
 
 1,260
Capital contributions from parent company
 
 79
 
 
 79
Other comprehensive income (loss)
 
 
 
 (7) (7)
Cash dividends on common stock
 
 
 (1,034) 
 (1,034)
Balance at December 31, 20159
 398
 6,275
 4,061
 (15) 10,719
Net income after dividends on preferred
and preference stock

 
 
 1,330
 
 1,330
Capital contributions from parent company
 
 610
 
 
 610
Other comprehensive income (loss)
 
 
 
 2
 2
Cash dividends on common stock
 
 
 (1,305) 
 (1,305)
Balance at December 31, 20169
 398
 6,885
 4,086
 (13) 11,356
Net income after dividends on preferred
and preference stock

 
 
 1,414
 
 1,414
Capital contributions from parent company
 
 443
 
 
 443
Other comprehensive income (loss)
 
 
 
 3
 3
Cash dividends on common stock
 
 
 (1,281) 
 (1,281)
Other
 
 
 (4) 
 (4)
Balance at December 31, 20179
 $398
 $7,328
 $4,215
 $(10) $11,931
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Georgia Power Company 2017 Annual Report




Indexwholesale energy compared to the Notes to Financial Statements



NOTES (continued)
Georgia Power Company 2017 Annual Report

1. SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES
General
Georgia Power Company (the Company) is a wholly-owned subsidiary of Southern Company, which is the parent company of the Company and three other traditional electric operating companies, as well as Southern Power, Southern Company Gas (as of July 1, 2016), SCS, Southern Linc, Southern Company Holdings, Inc. (Southern Holdings), Southern Nuclear, PowerSecure, Inc. (PowerSecure) (as of May 9, 2016), and other direct and indirect subsidiaries. The traditional electric operating companies – the Company, Alabama Power, Gulf Power, and Mississippi Power – are vertically integrated utilities providing electric service in four Southeastern states. The Company provides electric service to retail customers within its traditional service territory located within the State of Georgia and to wholesale customers in the Southeast. Southern Power develops, constructs, acquires, owns, and manages power generation assets, including renewable energy projects, and sells electricity at market-based rates in the wholesale market. Southern Company Gas distributes natural gas through utilities in seven states and is involved in several other complementary businesses including gas marketing services, wholesale gas services, and gas midstream operations. SCS, the system service company, provides, at cost, specialized services to Southern Company and its subsidiary companies. Southern Linc provides digital wireless communications for use by Southern Company and its subsidiary companies and also markets these services to the public and provides fiber optics services within the Southeast. Southern Holdings is an intermediate holding company subsidiary, primarily for Southern Company's investments in leveraged leases and for other electric services. Southern Nuclear operates and provides services to the Southern Company system's nuclear power plants, includinggeneration, demand for energy within the Company's Plant HatchSouthern Company system's electric service territory, and Plant Vogtle Units 1the availability of the Southern Company system's generation. Increases and 2,decreases in energy revenues that are driven by fuel prices are accompanied by an increase or decrease in fuel costs and is managing construction of Plant Vogtle Units 3do not have a significant impact on net income. In addition, Mississippi Power provides service under long-term contracts with rural electric cooperative associations and 4. PowerSecure is a provider of products and servicesmunicipalities located in the areas of distributed generation, energy efficiency, and utility infrastructure.
The equity method is used for subsidiaries insoutheastern Mississippi under cost-based electric tariffs which the Company has significant influence but does not control.
The Company isare subject to regulation by the FERCFERC. The contracts with these wholesale customers represented 17.3% of Mississippi Power's total operating revenues in 2018 and are generally subject to 10-year rolling cancellation notices. Historically, these wholesale customers have acted as a group and any changes in contractual relationships for one customer are likely to be followed by the other wholesale customers.
Short-term opportunity energy sales are also included in sales for resale to non-affiliates. These opportunity sales are made at market-based rates that generally provide a margin above Mississippi Power's variable cost to produce the energy.
Wholesale revenues from sales to affiliates will vary depending on demand and the Georgia PSC. As such, the Company's financial statements reflect the effectsavailability and cost of rate regulationgenerating resources at each company. These affiliate sales are made in accordance with GAAPthe IIC, as approved by the FERC. These transactions do not have a significant impact on earnings since this energy is generally sold at marginal cost.
Wholesale revenues from sales to affiliates increased $35 million, or 62.5%, in 2018 compared to 2017 and complyincreased $30 million, or 115.4%, in 2017 compared to 2016. The increases in 2018 and 2017 were primarily due to $19 million and $9 million, respectively, associated with the accounting policieshigher natural gas prices and practices prescribed by its regulatory commissions. The preparation of financial statements$16 million and $21 million, respectively, associated with increases in conformity with GAAP requires the use of estimates, and the actual results may differ from those estimates. Certain prior years' data presented in the financial statements have been reclassified to conformKWH sales due to the current year presentation.
In 2015, thedispatch of Mississippi Power's lower cost generation resources to serve Southern Company identified an error affecting the billing to a small number of large commercial and industrial customers under a rate plan allowing for variable demand-driven pricing from January 1, 2013 to June 30, 2015. In the second quarter 2015, the Company recorded an out of period adjustment of approximately $75 million to decrease retail revenues, resulting in a decrease to net income of approximately $47 million. The Company evaluated the effects of this error on the interim and annual periods that included the billing error. Based on an analysis of qualitative and quantitative factors, the Company determined the error was not material to any affected period and, therefore, an amendment of previously filed financial statements was not required.
Recently Issued Accounting Standards
Revenue
In 2014, the FASB issued ASC 606, Revenue from Contracts with Customers (ASC 606), replacing the existing accounting standard and industry specific guidance for revenue recognition with a five-step model for recognizing and measuring revenue from contracts with customers. The underlying principle of the new standard is to recognize revenue to depict the transfer of goods or services to customers at the amount expected to be collected. The new standard also requires enhanced disclosures regarding the nature, amount, timing, and uncertainty of revenue and the related cash flows arising from contracts with customers.
Most of the Company's revenue, including energy provided to customers, is from tariff offerings that provide electricity without a defined contractual term, as well as longer-term contractual commitments, including PPAs.
The Company has completed the evaluation of all revenue streams and determined that the adoption of ASC 606 will not change the current timing of revenue recognition for such transactions. Some revenue arrangements, such as energy-related derivatives, are excluded from the scope of ASC 606 and, therefore, will be accounted for and disclosed separately from revenues under ASC 606. The Company has concluded contributions in aid of construction are not in scope for ASC 606 and will continue to be accounted for as an offset to property, plant, and equipment.
The new standard is effective for reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2017. The Company applied the modified retrospective method of adoption effective January 1, 2018. The Company also utilized practical expedients which allowed it to apply the standard to open contracts at the date of adoption and to reflect the aggregate effect of all modifications when identifying performance obligations and allocating the transaction price for contracts modified before the effective date. Undersystem territorial load.
    Table of Contents                                Index to Financial Statements

NOTESMANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS (continued)
GeorgiaMississippi Power Company 20172018 Annual Report

Energy Sales
Changes in revenues are influenced heavily by the modified retrospective methodchange in the volume of adoption,energy sold from year to year. KWH sales for 2018 and the percent change from the prior year reportedwere as follows:
 
Total
KWHs
 
Total KWH
Percent Change
 Weather-Adjusted Percent Change
 2018 2018 2017 2018 2017
 (in millions)        
Residential2,113
 8.7 % (5.2)% 1.4 % 1.4 %
Commercial2,797
 1.2
 (2.7) (0.7) (0.1)
Industrial4,924
 1.7
 (1.3) 1.7
 (1.3)
Other37
 (4.1) (1.6) (4.1) (1.6)
Total retail9,871
 2.9
 (2.5) 0.9 % (0.4)%
Wholesale         
Non-affiliated3,980
 8.4
 (6.3)    
Affiliated2,584
 27.7
 82.7
    
Total wholesale6,564
 15.3
 14.0
    
Total energy sales16,435
 7.5 % 2.8 %    
Changes in retail energy sales are generally the result of changes in electricity usage by customers, changes in weather, and changes in the number of customers. Retail energy sales increased 2.9% in 2018 as compared to the prior year. This increase was primarily the result of colder weather in the first quarter and warmer weather in the second and third quarters 2018 as compared to the corresponding periods in 2017. Weather-adjusted residential KWH sales increased in 2018 primarily due to increased customer usage. Weather-adjusted commercial KWH sales decreased primarily due to decreased customer usage slightly offset by customer growth. The increase in industrial KWH energy sales was primarily due to Hurricane Nate, which negatively impacted several large industrial customers in 2017.
Retail energy sales decreased 2.5% in 2017 as compared to the prior year. This decrease was primarily the result of milder weather in 2017 as compared to 2016. Weather-adjusted residential KWH sales increased in 2017 primarily due to increased customer usage. Weather-adjusted commercial KWH sales decreased primarily due to decreased customer usage largely offset by customer growth. The decrease in industrial KWH energy sales was primarily due to Hurricane Nate, which negatively impacted several large industrial customers.
See "Operating Revenues" above for a discussion of significant changes in wholesale revenues to affiliated companies.
Fuel and Purchased Power Expenses
The mix of fuel sources for generation of electricity is determined primarily by demand, the unit cost of fuel consumed, and the availability of generating units. Additionally, Mississippi Power purchases a portion of its electricity needs from the wholesale market.

MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS (continued)
Mississippi Power Company 2018 Annual Report

Details of Mississippi Power's generation and purchased power were as follows:
 2018 2017 2016
Total generation (in millions of KWHs)
15,966
 15,319
 14,514
Total purchased power (in millions of KWHs)(*)
1,210
 724
 1,098
Sources of generation (percent) –
     
Gas93
 92
 91
Coal7
 8
 9
Cost of fuel, generated (in cents per net KWH) –
     
Gas2.65
 2.69
 2.41
Coal3.50
 3.64
 3.91
Average cost of fuel, generated (in cents per net KWH)
2.72
 2.77
 2.55
Average cost of purchased power (in cents per net KWH)(*)
3.39
 3.50
 3.07
(*)Adjusted to include the impacts of station service in 2018 and test period energy produced in 2017 and 2016 for the Kemper County energy facility, which was accounted for in accordance with FERC guidance.
Fuel and purchased power expenses were $446 million in 2018, an increase of $26 million, or 6.2%, as compared to the prior year. The increase was primarily due to a $35 million increase in KWHs generated and purchased, partially offset by a $9 million decrease in the average cost of generation and purchased power.
Fuel and purchased power expenses were $420 million in 2017, an increase of $43 million, or 11.4%, as compared to the prior year. The increase was primarily due to a $36 million increase in the average cost of generation and purchased power and a net increase of $7 million in KWHs generated from gas generation.
Fuel and purchased power energy transactions do not have a significant impact on earnings, since energy expenses are generally offset by energy revenues through Mississippi Power's fuel cost recovery clauses. See FUTURE EARNINGS POTENTIAL – "Retail Regulatory Matters – Fuel Cost Recovery" herein and Note 1 to the financial statements under "Fuel Costs" for additional information.
Fuel
Fuel expense increased $10 million, or 2.5%, in 2018 compared to 2017 primarily due to a 5.2% increase in KWHs generated from gas generation. Fuel expense increased $52 million, or 15.2%, in 2017 compared to 2016 primarily due to an 11.6% higher cost of natural gas.
Purchased Power
Purchased power expense increased $16 million, or 64.0%, in 2018 compared to 2017. The increase was primarily the result of a 67% increase in the volume of KWHs purchased. Purchased power expense decreased $9 million, or 26.5%, in 2017 compared to 2016. The decrease was primarily the result of a 34% decrease in the volume of KWHs purchased, offset by a 13.9% increase in the average cost per KWH purchased compared to 2016. The changes in the volume of KWHs purchased primarily reflect the impact of test period energy offsets in 2017.
Energy purchases will vary depending on the market prices of wholesale energy as compared to the cost of the Southern Company system's generation, demand for energy within the Southern Company system's service territory, and the availability of the Southern Company system's generation. These purchases are made in accordance with the IIC or other contractual agreements, as approved by the FERC.
Other Operations and Maintenance Expenses
Other operations and maintenance expenses increased $22 million, or 7.6%, in 2018 compared to the prior year. The increase was primarily due to a $15 million increase related to an employee attrition plan, a $12 million increase in planned generation outage cost, and a $7 million increase related to overhead line maintenance and vegetation management. These increases were partially offset by the deferral of $4 million of compensation costs in accordance with the PEP Settlement Agreement. See Note 2 to the financial statements under "Mississippi Power – Performance Evaluation Plan" for additional information.
Other operations and maintenance expenses decreased $26 million, or 8.2%, in 2017 compared to the prior year. The decrease was primarily due to a $10 million decrease in transmission and distribution expenses related to overhead line maintenance, an $8 million decrease in contractor services related to facilities, corporate advertising, and employee compensation and benefits, and an

MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS (continued)
Mississippi Power Company 2018 Annual Report

$8 million decrease related to the combined cycle and the associated common facilities portion of the Kemper County energy facility.
Depreciation and Amortization
Depreciation and amortization increased $8 million, or 5.0%, in 2018 compared to 2017 primarily due to $8 million of amortization related to the ECO Plan and $6 million of depreciation for additional plant in service. These increases were partially offset by a decrease of $4 million in amortization of regulatory assets associated with Mercury and Air Toxics Standards (MATS) rule compliance.
Depreciation and amortization increased $29 million, or 22.0%, in 2017 compared to 2016 primarily due to $13 million of amortization related to the ECO Plan, $7 million of depreciation for additional plant in service, and $6 million in additional amortization of regulatory assets associated with MATS rule compliance.
See Note 5 to the financial statements under "Depreciation and Amortization" and Note 2 to the financial statements under "FERC Matters" and "Mississippi Power – Environmental Compliance Overview Plan" for additional information.
Estimated Loss on Kemper IGCC
In 2018, 2017, and 2016, charges of $37 million, $3.36 billion, and $428 million, respectively, associated with the Kemper IGCC were recorded. The 2018 pre-tax charge of $37 million primarily resulted from the abandonment and related closure activities and ongoing period costs, net of sales proceeds, for the mine and gasifier-related assets at the Kemper County energy facility. In June 2017, Mississippi Power suspended the gasifier portion of the project and recorded a charge to earnings for the remaining $2.8 billion book value of the gasifier portion of the project. Prior to the suspension, Mississippi Power recorded losses for revisions of estimated costs expected to be incurred on construction of the Kemper IGCC in excess of the $2.88 billion cost cap established by the Mississippi PSC, net of $245 million of grants awarded to the project by the DOE under the Clean Coal Power Initiative Round 2 and excluding the cost of the lignite mine and equipment, the cost of the CO2 pipeline facilities, AFUDC, and certain general exceptions (Cost Cap Exceptions).
See Note 2 to the financial statements under "Kemper County Energy Facility" for additional information.
Allowance for Equity Funds Used During Construction
AFUDC equity decreased $72 million, or 100.0%, in 2018 as compared to 2017 and $52 million, or 41.9%, in 2017 as compared to 2016 as a result of suspending construction of the Kemper IGCC in June 2017. See Note 2 to the financial statements under "Kemper County Energy Facility" for additional information.
Interest Expense, Net of Amounts Capitalized
Interest expense, net of amounts capitalized increased $34 million, or 81.0%, in 2018 compared to 2017. The increase was primarily associated with a $33 million net reduction in interest recorded in 2017 following a settlement with the IRS related to research and experimental (R&E) deductions. The increase also reflects a $29 million reduction in interest capitalized as a result of suspending construction of the Kemper IGCC in June 2017, offset by decreases of $12 million in interest expense as a result of lower average outstanding debt, $8 million related to uncertain tax positions, and $7 million due to the completion of Kemper IGCC carrying cost amortization in 2017.
Interest expense, net of amounts capitalized decreased $32 million, or 43.2%, in 2017 compared to 2016. The decrease was primarily associated with a $33 million net reduction in interest following a settlement with the IRS related to R&E deductions. Also contributing to the decrease was the amortization of $6 million in interest deferrals in accordance with an order the Mississippi PSC issued in December 2015 (In-Service Asset Rate Order) and a $7 million decrease in interest related to outstanding debt as a result of lower balances and lower rates. These decreases were partially offset by a $20 million reduction in interest capitalized as a result of suspending construction of the Kemper IGCC.
See Note 10 to the financial statements under "Section 174 Research and Experimental Deduction" for additional information.
Other Income (Expense), Net
Other income (expense), net increased $16 million in 2018 compared to 2017. The increase primarily reflects the $24 million settlement of Mississippi Power's Deepwater Horizon claim in May 2018, partially offset by a $7 million increase in charitable donations. See Note 3 to the financial statements under "General Litigation Matters– Mississippi Power" for additional information. Other income (expense), net increased $3 million in 2017 compared to 2016.

MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS (continued)
Mississippi Power Company 2018 Annual Report

Income Taxes (Benefit)
Income tax benefits decreased $430 million, or 80.8%, in 2018 compared to 2017 primarily due to a $1.07 billion increase in income tax expense from higher pre-tax earnings primarily due to lower charges related to the Kemper County energy facility, net of the non-deductible AFUDC equity portion. This increase in income tax expense was partially offset by a $434 million decrease in income tax expense due to the impacts of the Tax Reform Legislation, including $407 million primarily associated with the revaluation of 2017 deferred tax assets related to the Kemper IGCC recorded in 2017 and $23 million associated with the lower federal income tax rate applicable in 2018, as well as $194 million related to the reduction in 2018 of a valuation allowance for a state income tax NOL carryforward recorded in 2017.
Income tax benefits increased $428 million, or 411.5%, in 2017 compared to 2016 primarily due to $809 million in tax benefits on the estimated probable losses on the Kemper IGCC, net of the non-deductible AFUDC equity portion and the related state valuation allowances, partially offset by $372 million resulting from Tax Reform Legislation. Tax Reform Legislation earnings impacts are primarily due to revaluing deferred tax assets related to the Kemper County energy facility.
See FUTURE EARNINGS POTENTIAL – "Income Tax Matters" herein and Note 10 to the financial statements for additional information.
Effects of Inflation
Mississippi Power is subject to rate regulation that is generally based on the recovery of historical and projected costs. The effects of inflation can create an economic loss since the recovery of costs could be in dollars that have less purchasing power. Any adverse effect of inflation on Mississippi Power's results of operations has not been substantial in recent years.
FUTURE EARNINGS POTENTIAL
General
Mississippi Power operates as a vertically integrated utility providing electric service to retail customers within its traditional service territory located in southeast Mississippi and to wholesale customers in the Southeast. Prices for electricity provided by Mississippi Power to retail customers are set by the Mississippi PSC under cost-based regulatory principles. Retail rates and earnings are reviewed and may be adjusted periodically within certain limitations. Prices for wholesale electricity sales, interconnecting transmission lines, and the exchange of electric power are regulated by the FERC. See "FERC Matters" herein, ACCOUNTING POLICIES – "Application of Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates – Utility Regulation" herein, and Note 2 to the financial statements for additional information about regulatory matters.
The results of operations for the past three years are not restated;necessarily indicative of future earnings potential. The level of Mississippi Power's future earnings depends on numerous factors that affect the opportunities, challenges, and risks of Mississippi Power's business of providing electric service. These factors include Mississippi Power's ability to recover its prudently-incurred costs in a timely manner during a time of increasing costs and its ability to prevail against legal challenges associated with the Kemper County energy facility. Future earnings will be driven primarily by continued customer growth and the weak pace of growth in electricity use per customer, especially in residential and commercial markets. Earnings will also depend upon maintaining and growing sales, considering, among other things, the adoption and/or penetration rates of increasingly energy-efficient technologies and increasing volumes of electronic commerce transactions, both of which could contribute to a net reduction in customer usage. Earnings are subject to a variety of other factors. These factors include weather, competition, developing new and maintaining existing energy contracts and associated load requirements with other utilities and other wholesale customers, energy conservation practiced by customers, the use of alternative energy sources by customers, the price of electricity, the price elasticity of demand, and the rate of economic growth or decline in Mississippi Power's service territory. Demand for electricity is primarily driven by the pace of economic growth that may be affected by changes in regional and global economic conditions, which may impact future earnings.
Mississippi Power's retail base rates are set under the PEP, a rate plan approved by the Mississippi PSC. Typically, two filings are made for each calendar year: the PEP projected filing, which is typically filed prior to the beginning of the year based on a projected revenue requirement, and the PEP lookback filing, which is filed after the end of the year and allows for review of the actual return compared to the allowed return range. Pursuant to the PEP Settlement Agreement, PEP proceedings are suspended until after the conclusion of the Mississippi Power 2019 Base Rate Case and Mississippi Power is not required to make any PEP filings for regulatory years 2018, 2019, and 2020. See "Retail Regulatory Matters" herein and Note 2 to the financial statements under "Mississippi Power – Performance Evaluation Plan" for more information.
On October 2, 2018, the Mississippi PSC approved the executed agreements between Mississippi Power and its largest retail customer, Chevron, for Mississippi Power to continue providing retail service to the Chevron refinery in Pascagoula, Mississippi

MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS (continued)
Mississippi Power Company 2018 Annual Report

through 2038. The new agreements are not expected to have a material impact on Mississippi Power's earnings; however, the co-generation assets located at the refinery are accounted for as a cumulative-effect adjustmentsales-type lease in accordance with the new lease accounting rules that became effective in 2019. These assets are also subject to retaineda security interest granted to Chevron. See FINANCIAL CONDITION AND LIQUIDITY – "Credit Rating Risk" herein for additional information.
Mississippi Power provides service under long-term contracts with rural electric cooperative associations and municipalities located in southeastern Mississippi under cost-based electric tariffs which are subject to regulation by the FERC. The contracts with these wholesale customers represented 17.3% of Mississippi Power's total operating revenues in 2018 and are generally subject to 10-year rolling cancellation notices. Historically, these wholesale customers have acted as a group and any changes in contractual relationships for one customer are likely to be followed by the other wholesale customers.
Environmental Matters
Mississippi Power's operations are regulated by state and federal environmental agencies through a variety of laws and regulations governing air, water, land, and protection of other natural resources. Mississippi Power maintains comprehensive environmental compliance and GHG strategies to assess upcoming requirements and compliance costs associated with these environmental laws and regulations. The costs, including capital expenditures, operations and maintenance costs, and costs reflected in ARO liabilities, required to comply with environmental laws and regulations and to achieve stated goals may impact future electric generating unit retirement and replacement decisions, results of operations, cash flows, and/or financial condition. Related costs may result from the installation of additional environmental controls, closure and monitoring of CCR facilities, unit retirements, or changing fuel sources for certain existing units, as well as related upgrades to Mississippi Power's transmission and distribution systems. A major portion of these costs is expected to be recovered through retail and wholesale rates. The ultimate impact of environmental laws and regulations and the GHG goals discussed herein will depend on various factors, such as state adoption and implementation of requirements, the availability and cost of any deployed technology, fuel prices, and the outcome of pending and/or future legal challenges.
New or revised environmental laws and regulations could affect many areas of Mississippi Power's operations. The impact of any such changes cannot be determined at this time. Environmental compliance costs could affect earnings if such costs cannot continue to be recovered in rates on a timely basis or through long-term wholesale agreements. Further, increased costs that are recovered through regulated rates could contribute to reduced demand for electricity, which could negatively affect results of operations, cash flows, and/or financial condition. Additionally, many commercial and industrial customers may also be affected by existing and future environmental requirements, which for some may have the potential to ultimately affect their demand for electricity. See Note 2 to the financial statements under "Mississippi Power – Environmental Compliance Overview Plan" for additional information.
Through 2018, Mississippi Power has invested approximately $654 million in environmental capital retrofit projects to comply with environmental requirements, with annual totals of approximately $11 million, $9 million, and $17 million for 2018, 2017, and 2016, respectively. Although the timing, requirements, and estimated costs could change as environmental laws and regulations are adopted or modified, as compliance plans are revised or updated, and as legal challenges to rules are initiated or completed, Mississippi Power's current compliance strategy estimates capital expenditures of $73 million from 2019 through 2023, with annual totals of approximately $18 million, $20 million, $17 million, $5 million, and $13 million for 2019, 2020, 2021, 2022, and 2023, respectively. These estimates do not include any potential compliance costs associated with pending regulation of CO2 emissions from fossil fuel-fired electric generating units. See "Global Climate Issues" herein for additional information. Mississippi Power also anticipates expenditures associated with ash pond closure and ground water monitoring under the CCR Rule, which are reflected in Mississippi Power's ARO liabilities. See FINANCIAL CONDITION AND LIQUIDITY – "Capital Requirements and Contractual Obligations" herein and Note 6 to the financial statements for additional information.
Environmental Laws and Regulations
Air Quality
The EPA has set National Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS) for six air pollutants (carbon monoxide, lead, nitrogen dioxide, ozone, particulate matter, and SO2) to protect and improve the nation's air quality, which it reviews and revises periodically. Following a NAAQS revision, states are required to develop an EPA-approved plan to protect air quality. These state plans can require additional emission controls, improvements in control efficiency, or fuel changes which can result in increased compliance and operational costs. NAAQS requirements can also adversely affect the siting of new electric generating facilities. All areas within Mississippi Power's service territory have been designated as attainment for all NAAQS. If areas are designated as nonattainment in the future, increased compliance costs could result.

MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS (continued)
Mississippi Power Company 2018 Annual Report

In 2011, the EPA finalized the Cross-State Air Pollution Rule (CSAPR) to address impacts of SO2 and NOX emissions from fossil fuel-fired electric generating plants. CSAPR establishes emissions trading programs and budgets for certain states and allocates emissions allowances for sources in those states. In 2016, the EPA published a final rule establishing more stringent ozone season NOX emissions budgets in Alabama and Mississippi. The outcome of ongoing CSAPR litigation concerning the 2016 CSAPR rule, to which Mississippi Power is a party, could have an impact on the State of Mississippi's ozone season NOX emissions budget. Increases in either future fossil fuel-fired generation or the availability or cost of CSAPR allowances could have a negative financial impact on results of operations for Mississippi Power.
The EPA finalized regional haze regulations in 2005 and 2017. These regulations require states, tribal governments, and various federal agencies to develop and implement plans to reduce pollutants that impair visibility and demonstrate reasonable progress toward the goal of restoring natural visibility conditions in certain areas, including national parks and wilderness areas. States must submit a revised state implementation plan (SIP) to the EPA demonstrating continued reasonable progress towards achieving visibility improvement goals. These plans could require reductions in certain pollutants, such as particulate matter, SO2, and NOX, which could result in increased compliance costs. The EPA issued a limited approval of the regional progress SIP for the State of Mississippi because Mississippi must revise the best available retrofit technology (BART) provisions of its SIP. Therefore, Plant Daniel continues to be evaluated under the regional haze BART provisions. Mississippi Power is required to submit Plant Daniel's BART analysis to the State of Mississippi by summer 2019. Requirements for further reduction of these pollutants at Plant Daniel could increase compliance costs.
Water Quality
In 2014, the EPA finalized requirements under Section 316(b) of the Clean Water Act (CWA) to regulate cooling water intake structures (CWIS) to minimize their effects on fish and other aquatic life at existing power plants (e.g. coal, natural gas, oil, and nuclear generating plants) and manufacturing facilities. The regulation requires plant-specific studies to determine applicable CWIS changes to protect organisms that either get caught on the intake screens (impingement) or are drawn into the cooling system (entrainment). Mississippi Power is conducting these studies and currently anticipates applicable CWIS changes may include fish-friendly CWIS screens with fish return systems and minor additions of monitoring equipment at certain plants. However, the ultimate impact of this rule will depend on the outcome of these plant-specific studies, any additional protective measures required to be incorporated into each plant's National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit based on site-specific factors, and the outcome of any legal challenges.
In 2015, the EPA finalized the steam electric effluent limitations guidelines (ELG) rule (2015 ELG Rule) that set national standards for wastewater discharges from new and existing steam electric generating units generating greater than 50 MWs. The 2015 ELG Rule prohibits effluent discharges of certain waste streams and imposes stringent limits on flue gas desulfurization (scrubber) wastewater discharges. The revised technology-based limits and the CCR Rule require extensive changes to existing ash and wastewater management systems or the installation and operation of new ash and wastewater management systems. Compliance with the 2015 ELG Rule is expected to require capital expenditures and increased operational costs primarily for Mississippi Power's coal-fired electric generation. State environmental agencies will incorporate specific compliance applicability dates in the NPDES permitting process for each ELG waste stream no later than December 31, 2023. The EPA is scheduled to issue a new rulemaking by December 2019 that could revise the limitations and applicability dates of two of the waste streams regulated in the 2015 ELG Rule. The impact of any changes to the 2015 ELG Rule will depend on the content of the new rule and the outcome of any legal challenges.
In 2015, the EPA and the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (Corps) jointly published a final rule that revised the regulatory definition of waters of the United States (WOTUS) for all CWA programs. The rule significantly expanded the scope of federal jurisdiction over waterbodies (such as rivers, streams, canals, and wastewater treatment ponds), which could impact new generation projects and permitting and reporting requirements associated with the installation, expansion, and maintenance of transmission and distribution projects. The EPA and the Corps are expected to publish a final rule in 2019 to replace the 2015 WOTUS definition. The impact of any changes to the 2015 WOTUS rule will depend on the content of this final rule and the outcome of any legal challenges.
Coal Combustion Residuals
In 2015, the EPA finalized non-hazardous solid waste regulations for the disposal of CCR, including coal ash and gypsum, in landfills and surface impoundments (ash ponds) at active generating power plants. The EPA's CCR Rule requires landfills and ash ponds to be evaluated against a set of performance criteria and potentially closed if minimum criteria are not met. Closure of existing landfills and ash ponds could require installation of equipment and infrastructure to manage CCR in accordance with the CCR Rule. Based on cost estimates for closure and monitoring of landfills and ash ponds pursuant to the CCR Rule, Mississippi

MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS (continued)
Mississippi Power Company 2018 Annual Report

Power recorded AROs for each CCR unit in 2015. As further analysis was performed and closure details were developed, Mississippi Power has continued to periodically update these cost estimates, as discussed further below.
The EPA published certain amendments to the CCR Rule, which became effective August 29, 2018. These amendments extend the date from April 2019 to October 31, 2020 to cease sending CCR and other waste streams to ash ponds that demonstrate compliance with all except two of the specified performance criteria.
On August 21, 2018, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit issued a decision suggesting the EPA should regulate previously-excluded inactive ash ponds located at retired generation facilities and questioning both the ability of unlined ash ponds to continue operating no matter the performance criteria results and the classification of clay-lined landfills and ash ponds. These developments could impact the expected timing of Mississippi Power's landfill and ash pond closure activities, but the extent of any impact will depend on the outcome of ongoing litigation, anticipated EPA rulemaking action to establish further guidance, and the outcome of any legal challenges.
During 2018, Mississippi Power recorded increases of approximately $16 million to its AROs related to the CCR Rule. The increases include approximately $11 million based on information from feasibility studies performed on an ash pond at Plant Greene County, which is co-owned with Alabama Power, and approximately $5 million related to increases in post-closure care for Plant Watson's ash pond and landfill. The Alabama Power studies for Plant Greene County indicated that additional closure costs, primarily related to increases in estimated ash volume, water management requirements, and design revisions, will be required to close the ash pond under the planned closure-in-place methodology. As the level of work becomes more defined in the next 12 months, it is likely that these cost estimates will change and the change could be material. Mississippi Power expects to periodically update its ARO cost estimates.
In 2016, the Mississippi PSC granted a CPCN to Mississippi Power authorizing certain projects associated with complying with the CCR Rule. Additionally in this order, the Mississippi PSC also authorized Mississippi Power to recover any costs associated with the CPCN, including future monitoring costs, through the ECO clause. Absent continued recovery of ARO costs through regulated rates, Mississippi Power's results of operations, cash flows, and financial condition could be materially impacted. See FINANCIAL CONDITION AND LIQUIDITY – "Capital Requirements and Contractual Obligations" herein and Note 6 to the financial statements for additional information regarding Mississippi Power's AROs.
The ultimate outcome of these matters cannot be determined at this time.
Environmental Remediation
Mississippi Power must comply with environmental laws and regulations governing the handling and disposal of waste and releases of hazardous substances. Under these various laws and regulations, Mississippi Power may also incur substantial costs to clean up affected sites. Mississippi Power has authority from the Mississippi PSC to recover approved environmental compliance costs through established regulatory mechanisms. Mississippi Power recognizes a liability for environmental remediation costs only when it determines a loss is probable and reasonably estimable.
Global Climate Issues
On August 31, 2018, the EPA published a proposed rule known as the Affordable Clean Energy (ACE) Rule, which is intended to replace a regulation enacted in 2015 known as the Clean Power Plan (CPP), that would limit CO2 emissions from existing fossil fuel-fired electric generating units. The CPP has been stayed by the U.S. Supreme Court since 2016. The ACE Rule would require states to develop GHG unit-specific emission rate standards based on heat-rate efficiency improvements for existing fossil fuel-fired steam units. As proposed, combustion turbines, including natural gas combined cycles, are not affected sources. As of January 1, 2019, Mississippi Power has ownership interests in six fossil fuel-fired steam units to which the proposed ACE Rule is applicable. The ultimate impact of this rule to Mississippi Power is currently unknown and will depend on changes between the proposal and the final rule, subsequent state plan developments and requirements, and any associated legal challenges.
On December 20, 2018, the EPA published a proposed review of the Standards of Performance for Greenhouse Gas Emissions from New, Modified, and Reconstructed Stationary Sources: Electric Utility Generating Units final rule (2015 NSPS rule). The EPA's final 2015 NSPS rule set standards of performance for new, modified, and reconstructed electric utility generating units which included stationary combustion turbines and fossil-fired steam boilers. This proposal reduces the stringency of the 2015 NSPS rule by not basing the new and reconstructed fossil-fired steam boiler and IGCC standards on partial carbon capture and sequestration. The impact of any changes to this rule will depend on the content of the final rule and the outcome of any legal challenges.
The EPA's GHG reporting rule requires annual reporting of GHG emissions expressed in terms of metric tons of CO2 equivalent emissions for a company's operational control of facilities. Based on ownership or financial control of facilities, Mississippi

MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS (continued)
Mississippi Power Company 2018 Annual Report

Power's 2017 GHG emissions were approximately 8 million metric tons of CO2 equivalent. The preliminary estimate of Mississippi Power's 2018 GHG emissions on the same basis is approximately 8 million metric tons of CO2 equivalent.
Through 2017, the Southern Company system has achieved an estimated GHG emission reduction of 36% since 2007. In April 2018, Southern Company established an intermediate goal of a 50% reduction in carbon emissions from 2007 levels by 2030 and a long-term goal of low- to no-carbon operations by 2050. To achieve these goals, the Southern Company system expects to continue growing its renewable energy portfolio, optimize technology advancements to modernize its transmission and distribution systems, increase the use of natural gas for generation, complete ongoing construction projects, invest in energy efficiency, and continue research and development efforts focused on technologies to lower GHG emissions. The Southern Company system's ability to achieve these goals also will be dependent on many external factors, including supportive national energy policies, low natural gas prices, and the development, deployment, and advancement of relevant energy technologies.
FERC Matters
Municipal and Rural Associations Tariff
Mississippi Power provides wholesale electric service to Cooperative Energy, East Mississippi Electric Power Association, and the City of Collins, all located in southeastern Mississippi, under a long-term cost-based, FERC-regulated MRA tariff.
In 2016, Mississippi Power reached a settlement agreement with its wholesale customers, which was subsequently approved by the FERC, for an increase in wholesale base revenues under the MRA cost-based electric tariff, primarily as a result of placing scrubbers for Plant Daniel Units 1 and 2 in service in 2015. The settlement agreement became effective for services rendered beginning May 1, 2016, resulting in an estimated annual revenue increase of $7 million under the MRA cost-based electric tariff. Additionally, under the settlement agreement, the tariff customers agreed to similar regulatory treatment for MRA tariff ratemaking as the treatment approved for retail ratemaking under the In-Service Asset Rate Order. This regulatory treatment primarily included (i) recovery of the operational Kemper County energy facility assets providing service to customers and other related costs, (ii) amortization of the Kemper County energy facility-related regulatory assets included in rates under the settlement agreement over the 36 months ending April 30, 2019, (iii) Kemper County energy facility-related expenses included in rates under the settlement agreement no longer being deferred and charged to expense, and (iv) removing all of the Kemper County energy facility CWIP from rate base with a corresponding increase in accrual of AFUDC, which totaled approximately $22 million through the suspension of Kemper IGCC start-up activities.
Mississippi Power expects to reach a subsequent settlement agreement with its wholesale customers and will make a filing with the FERC during the first quarter 2019. The settlement agreement is intended to be consistent with the Kemper Settlement Agreement, including the impact of the Tax Reform Legislation. The ultimate outcome of this matter cannot be determined at this time.
In September 2017, Mississippi Power and Cooperative Energy executed a Shared Service Agreement (SSA), as part of the MRA tariff, under which Mississippi Power and Cooperative Energy will share in providing electricity to all Cooperative Energy delivery points, in lieu of the current arrangement under which each delivery point is specifically assigned to either entity. The SSA accepted by the FERC in October 2017 became effective on January 1, 2018 and may be cancelled by Cooperative Energy with 10 years notice after December 31, 2020. The SSA provides Cooperative Energy the option to decrease its use of Mississippi Power's generation services under the MRA tariff, subject to annual and cumulative caps and a one-year notice requirement. In the event Cooperative Energy elects to reduce these services, the related reduction in Mississippi Power's revenues is recorded.not expected to be significant through 2020.
Fuel Cost Recovery
Mississippi Power has a wholesale MRA and a Market Based (MB) fuel cost recovery factor. Effective with the first billing cycle for January 2018, fuel rates increased $11 million annually for wholesale MRA customers and $1 million annually for wholesale MB customers. Effective January 1, 2019, the wholesale MRA fuel rate decreased $16 million annually and the wholesale MB fuel rate decreased by an immaterial amount. At December 31, 2018, over recovered wholesale MRA fuel costs included in other regulatory liabilities, current on the balance sheet were approximately $6 million compared to an immaterial amount at December 31, 2017. Under recovered wholesale MB fuel costs included in the balance sheets were immaterial at December 31, 2018 and 2017.
Mississippi Power's operating revenues are adjusted for differences in actual recoverable fuel cost and amounts billed in accordance with the currently approved cost recovery rate. Accordingly, changes in the billing factor should have no significant effect on Mississippi Power's revenues or net income, but will affect cash flow.

MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS (continued)
Mississippi Power Company 2018 Annual Report

Open Access Transmission Tariff
On May 10, 2018, AMEA and Cooperative Energy filed with the FERC a complaint against SCS and the traditional electric operating companies (including Mississippi Power) claiming that the current 11.25% base ROE used in calculating the annual transmission revenue requirements of the traditional electric operating companies' (including Mississippi Power's) open access transmission tariff is unjust and unreasonable as measured by the applicable FERC standards. The complaint requested that the base ROE be set no higher than 8.65% and that the FERC order refunds for the difference in revenue requirements that results from applying a just and reasonable ROE established in this proceeding upon determining the current ROE is unjust and unreasonable. On June 18, 2018, SCS and the traditional electric operating companies (including Mississippi Power) filed their response challenging the adequacy of the showing presented by the complainants and offering support for the current ROE. On September 6, 2018, the FERC issued an order establishing a refund effective date of May 10, 2018 in the event a refund is due and initiating an investigation and settlement procedures regarding the current base ROE. Through December 31, 2018, the estimated maximum potential refund is not expected to be material to Mississippi Power's results of operations or cash flows. The ultimate outcome of this matter cannot be determined at this time.
Cooperative Energy Power Supply Agreement
In 2008, Mississippi Power entered into a 10-year power supply agreement (PSA) with Cooperative Energy for approximately 152 MWs, which became effective in 2011. Following certain plant retirements, the PSA capacity was reduced to 86 MWs. On February 5, 2018, Mississippi Power and Cooperative Energy executed an amendment to extend the PSA through March 31, 2021, effective April 1, 2018, which increased total capacity by 286 MWs.
Cooperative Energy also has a 10-year network integration transmission service agreement (NITSA) with SCS for transmission service to certain delivery points on Mississippi Power's transmission system that became effective in 2011. As a result of the PSA amendment, Cooperative Energy and SCS amended the terms of the NITSA, which the FERC approved, to provide for the purchase of incremental transmission capacity for service beginning April 1, 2018 through March 31, 2021.
Retail Regulatory Matters
Mississippi Power's rates and charges for service to retail customers are subject to the regulatory oversight of the Mississippi PSC. Mississippi Power's rates are a combination of base rates and several separate cost recovery clauses for specific categories of costs. These separate cost recovery clauses address such items as fuel and purchased power, energy efficiency programs, ad valorem taxes, property damage, and the costs of compliance with environmental laws and regulations. Costs not addressed through one of the specific cost recovery clauses are expected to be recovered through Mississippi Power's base rates. See Note 2 to the financial statements under "Mississippi Power" for additional information.
Operations Review
In August 2018, the Mississippi PSC began an operations review of Mississippi Power, for which the final report is expected prior to the conclusion of the Mississippi Power 2019 Base Rate Case. Mississippi Power expects that the review will include, but not be limited to, a comparative analysis of its costs, its cost recovery framework, and ways in which it may streamline management operations for the reasonable benefit of ratepayers. The ultimate outcome of this matter cannot be determined at this time.
Performance Evaluation Plan
Mississippi Power's retail base rates generally are set under the PEP, a rate plan approved by the Mississippi PSC. Two filings are made for each calendar year: the PEP projected filing, which is typically filed prior to the beginning of the year based on a projected revenue requirement, and the PEP lookback filing, which is filed after the end of the year and allows for review of the actual revenue requirement compared to the projected filing.
In 2011, Mississippi Power submitted its annual PEP lookback filing for 2010, which recommended no surcharge or refund. Later in 2011, the MPUS disputed certain items in the 2010 PEP lookback filing. In 2012, the Mississippi PSC issued an order canceling Mississippi Power's PEP lookback filing for 2011. In 2013, the MPUS contested Mississippi Power's PEP lookback filing for 2012, which indicated a refund due to customers of $5 million. In 2014 through 2018, Mississippi Power submitted its annual PEP lookback filings for the prior years, which for each of 2013, 2014, and 2017 indicated no surcharge or refund and for each of 2015 and 2016 indicated a $5 million surcharge. Additionally, in July 2016, in November 2016, and in November 2017, Mississippi Power submitted its annual projected PEP filings for 2016, 2017, and 2018, respectively, which for 2016 and 2017 indicated no change in rates and for 2018 indicated a rate increase of 4%, or $38 million in annual revenues. The Mississippi PSC suspended each of these filings to allow more time for review.

MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS (continued)
Mississippi Power Company 2018 Annual Report

On February 7, 2018, Mississippi Power revised its annual projected PEP filing for 2018 to reflect the impacts of the Tax Reform Legislation. The revised filing requested an increase of $26 million in annual revenues, based on a performance adjusted ROE of 9.33% and an increased equity ratio of 55%. On July 27, 2018, Mississippi Power and the MPUS entered into the PEP Settlement Agreement, which was approved by the Mississippi PSC on August 7, 2018. Rates under the PEP Settlement Agreement became effective with the first billing cycle of September 2018. The PEP Settlement Agreement provides for an increase of approximately $21.6 million in annual base retail revenues, which excludes certain compensation costs contested by the MPUS, as well as approximately $2 million which was subsequently approved for recovery through the 2018 Energy Efficiency Cost Rider as discussed below. Under the PEP Settlement Agreement, Mississippi Power is deferring the contested compensation costs for 2018 and 2019 as a regulatory asset, which totaled $4 million as of December 31, 2018 and is included in other regulatory assets, deferred on the balance sheet. The Mississippi PSC is currently expected to rule on the appropriate treatment for such costs in connection with the Mississippi Power 2019 Base Rate Case. The ultimate outcome of this matter cannot be determined at this time.
Pursuant to the PEP Settlement Agreement, Mississippi Power's performance-adjusted allowed ROE is 9.31% and its allowed equity ratio is capped at 51%, pending further review by the Mississippi PSC. In lieu of the requested equity ratio increase, Mississippi Power retained $44 million of excess accumulated deferred income taxes resulting from the Tax Reform Legislation until the conclusion of the Mississippi Power 2019 Base Rate Case. Further, Mississippi Power agreed to seek equity contributions sufficient to restore its equity ratio to 50% by December 31, 2018. Since Mississippi Power's actual average equity ratio for 2018 was more than 1% lower than the 50% target, Mississippi Power deferred the corresponding difference in its revenue requirement of approximately $4 million as a regulatory liability for resolution in the Mississippi Power 2019 Base Rate Case. Pursuant to the PEP Settlement Agreement, PEP proceedings are suspended until after the conclusion of the Mississippi Power 2019 Base Rate Case and Mississippi Power is not required to make any PEP filings for regulatory years 2018, 2019, and 2020. The PEP Settlement Agreement also resolved all open PEP filings with no change to customer rates. As a result, in the third quarter 2018, Mississippi Power recognized revenues of $5 million previously reserved in connection with the 2012 PEP lookback filing.
Energy Efficiency
In 2013, the Mississippi PSC approved an energy efficiency and conservation rule requiring electric and gas utilities in Mississippi serving more than 25,000 customers to implement energy efficiency programs and standards. Quick Start Plans, which include a portfolio of energy efficiency programs that are intended to provide benefits to a majority of customers, were extended by an order issued by the Mississippi PSC in July 2016, until the time the Mississippi PSC approves a comprehensive portfolio plan program. The ultimate outcome of this matter cannot be determined at this time.
On May 8, 2018, the Mississippi PSC issued an order approving Mississippi Power's revised annual projected Energy Efficiency Cost Rider 2018 compliance filing, which increased annual retail revenues by approximately $3 million effective with the first billing cycle for June 2018.
On February 5, 2019, the Mississippi PSC issued an order approving Mississippi Power's Energy Efficiency Cost Rider 2019 compliance filing, which included a slight decrease in annual retail revenues, effective with the first billing cycle in March 2019.
Environmental Compliance Overview Plan
In accordance with a 2011 accounting order from the Mississippi PSC, Mississippi Power has the authority to defer in a regulatory asset for future recovery all plant retirement- or partial retirement-related costs resulting from environmental regulations. The Mississippi PSC approved $41 million and $17 million of costs that were reclassified to regulatory assets associated with the fuel conversion of Plant Watson and Plant Greene County, respectively, for amortization over five-year periods that began in July 2016 and July 2017, respectively. As a result, these decisions are not expected to have a material impact on Mississippi Power's financial statements.
In August 2016, the Mississippi PSC approved Mississippi Power's revised ECO Plan filing for 2016, which requested the maximum 2% annual increase in revenues, or approximately $18 million, primarily related to the Plant Daniel Units 1 and 2 scrubbers placed in service in 2015. The revised rates became effective with the first billing cycle for September 2016. Approximately $22 million of related revenue requirements in excess of the 2% maximum was deferred for inclusion in the 2017 filing, along with related carrying costs.
In May 2017, the Mississippi PSC approved Mississippi Power's ECO Plan filing for 2017, which requested the maximum 2% annual increase in revenues, or approximately $18 million, primarily related to the carryforward from the prior year. The rates became effective with the first billing cycle for June 2017. Approximately $26 million, plus carrying costs, of related revenue requirements in excess of the 2% maximum was deferred for inclusion in the 2018 filing.

MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS (continued)
Mississippi Power Company 2018 Annual Report

On February 14, 2018, Mississippi Power submitted its ECO Plan filing for 2018, including the effects of the Tax Reform Legislation, which requested the maximum 2% annual increase in revenues, or approximately $17 million, primarily related to the carryforward from the prior year.
On August 3, 2018, Mississippi Power and the MPUS entered into the ECO Settlement Agreement, which provides for an increase of approximately $17 million in annual base retail revenues and was approved by the Mississippi PSC on August 7, 2018. Rates under the ECO Settlement Agreement became effective with the first billing cycle of September 2018 and will continue in effect until modified by the Mississippi PSC. These revenues are expected to be sufficient to recover the costs included in Mississippi Power's request for 2018, as well as the remaining deferred amounts, totaling $26 million at December 31, 2018, along with the related carrying costs. In accordance with the ECO Settlement Agreement, ECO Plan proceedings are suspended until after the conclusion of the Mississippi Power 2019 Base Rate Case and Mississippi Power is not required to make any ECO Plan filings for 2018, 2019, and 2020, with any necessary adjustments to be reflected in the Mississippi Power 2019 Base Rate Case. The ECO Settlement Agreement contains the same terms as the PEP Settlement Agreement described herein with respect to allowed ROE and equity ratio. At December 31, 2018, Mississippi Power has recorded $2 million in other regulatory liabilities, deferred on the balance sheet related to the actual December 31, 2018 average equity ratio differential from target applicable to the ECO Plan.
Fuel Cost Recovery
Mississippi Power establishes, annually, a retail fuel cost recovery factor that is approved by the Mississippi PSC. Mississippi Power is required to file for an adjustment to the retail fuel cost recovery factor annually. In January 2017, the Mississippi PSC approved the 2017 retail fuel cost recovery factor, effective February 2017 through January 2018, which resulted in an annual revenue increase of $55 million. On January 16, 2018, the Mississippi PSC approved the 2018 retail fuel cost recovery factor, effective February 2018 through January 2019, which resulted in an annual revenue increase of $39 million. At December 31, 2018, the amount of over recovered retail fuel costs included in the balance sheet in other accounts payable was approximately $8 million compared to $6 million under recovered at December 31, 2017. On January 10, 2019, the Mississippi PSC approved the 2019 retail fuel cost recovery factor, effective February 2019, which results in a $35 million decrease in annual revenues as a result of lower expected fuel costs.
Mississippi Power's operating revenues are adjusted for differences in actual recoverable fuel cost and amounts billed in accordance with the currently approved cost recovery rate. Accordingly, changes in the billing factor should have no significant effect on Mississippi Power's revenues or net income but will affect operating cash flows.
Ad Valorem Tax Adjustment
Mississippi Power establishes annually an ad valorem tax adjustment factor that is approved by the Mississippi PSC to collect the ad valorem taxes paid by Mississippi Power. On May 8, 2018, the Mississippi PSC approved Mississippi Power's annual ad valorem tax adjustment factor filing for 2018, which included a rate increase of 0.8%, or $7 million, effective with the first billing cycle for June 2018.
Kemper County Energy Facility
Overview
The Kemper County energy facility was designed to utilize IGCC technology with an expected output capacity of 582 MWs and to be fueled by locally mined lignite (an abundant, lower heating value coal) from a mine owned by Mississippi Power and situated adjacent to the Kemper County energy facility. The mine, operated by North American Coal Corporation, started commercial operation in 2013. In connection with the Kemper County energy facility construction, Mississippi Power constructed approximately 61 miles of CO2 pipeline infrastructure for the transport of captured CO2 for use in enhanced oil recovery.
Schedule and Cost Estimate
In 2012, the Mississippi PSC issued an order (2012 MPSC CPCN Order), confirming the CPCN originally approved by the Mississippi PSC in 2010 authorizing the acquisition, construction, and operation of the Kemper County energy facility. The certificated cost estimate of the Kemper County energy facility included in the 2012 MPSC CPCN Order was $2.4 billion, net of approximately $0.57 billion in Cost Cap Exceptions. The 2012 MPSC CPCN Order approved a construction cost cap of up to $2.88 billion, with recovery of prudently-incurred costs subject to approval by the Mississippi PSC. The Kemper County energy facility was originally projected to be placed in service in May 2014. Mississippi Power placed the combined cycle and the associated common facilities portion of the Kemper County energy facility in service in August 2014. The combined cycle and associated common facilities portions of the Kemper County energy facility were dedicated as Plant Ratcliffe on April 27, 2018.

MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS (continued)
Mississippi Power Company 2018 Annual Report

On June 21, 2017, the Mississippi PSC stated its intent to issue an order, which occurred on July 6, 2017, directing Mississippi Power to pursue a settlement under which the Kemper County energy facility would be operated as a natural gas plant, rather than an IGCC plant, and address all issues associated with the Kemper County energy facility. The order established the Kemper Settlement Docket. On June 28, 2017, Mississippi Power notified the Mississippi PSC that it would begin a process to suspend operations and start-up activities on the gasifier portion of the Kemper County energy facility, given the uncertainty as to its future.
At the time of project suspension in June 2017, the total cost estimate for the Kemper County energy facility was approximately $7.38 billion, including approximately $5.95 billion of costs subject to the construction cost cap, and was net of the $137 million in additional grants from the DOE received in April 2016 (Additional DOE Grants). In the aggregate, Mississippi Power had recorded charges to income of $3.07 billion ($1.89 billion after tax) as a result of changes in the cost estimate above the cost cap for the Kemper IGCC through May 31, 2017.
Given the Mississippi PSC's stated intent regarding no further rate increase for the Kemper County energy facility and the subsequent suspension, cost recovery of the gasifier portions became no longer probable; therefore, Mississippi Power recorded an additional charge to income in June 2017 of $2.8 billion ($2.0 billion after tax), which included estimated costs associated with the gasification portions of the plant and lignite mine. During the third and fourth quarters of 2017, Mississippi Power recorded charges to income of $242 million ($206 million after tax), including $164 million for ongoing project costs, estimated mine and gasifier-related costs, and certain termination costs during the suspension period prior to conclusion of the Kemper Settlement Docket, as well as the charge associated with the Kemper Settlement Agreement discussed below.
In 2018, Mississippi Power recorded pre-tax charges to income of $37 million ($27 million after tax), primarily resulting from the abandonment and related closure activities and ongoing period costs, net of sales proceeds, for the mine and gasifier-related assets at the Kemper County energy facility. In addition, quarterly disclosures willMississippi Power recorded a credit to earnings of $95 million in the fourth quarter 2018 primarily resulting from the reduction of a valuation allowance for a state income tax NOL carryforward associated with the Kemper County energy facility. Additional closure costs for the mine and gasifier-related assets, currently estimated at up to $10 million pre-tax (excluding salvage, net of dismantlement costs), may be incurred through the first half of 2020. In addition, period costs, including, but not limited to, costs for compliance and safety, ARO accretion, and property taxes for the mine and gasifier-related assets, are estimated to total $11 million in 2019 and $2 million to $4 million annually in 2020 through 2023. Mississippi Power is currently evaluating its options regarding the final disposition of the CO2 pipeline, including removal of the pipeline. This evaluation is expected to be complete later in 2019. If Mississippi Power ultimately decides to remove the CO2 pipeline, the cost of removal would have a material impact on Mississippi Power's financial statements. The ultimate outcome of these matters cannot be determined at this time.
See Note 10 to the financial statements for additional information.
Rate Recovery
Kemper Settlement Agreement
In 2015, the Mississippi PSC issued the In-Service Asset Rate Order regarding the Kemper County energy facility assets that were commercially operational and providing service to customers (the transmission facilities, combined cycle, natural gas pipeline, and water pipeline) and other related costs. The In-Service Asset Rate Order provided for retail rate recovery of an annual revenue requirement of approximately $126 million which went into effect on December 17, 2015.
On February 6, 2018, the Mississippi PSC voted to approve the Kemper Settlement Agreement, which resolved all cost recovery issues, modified the CPCN to limit the Kemper County energy facility to natural gas combined cycle operation, and provided for an annual revenue requirement of approximately $99.3 million for costs related to the Kemper County energy facility, which included the impact of the Tax Reform Legislation. The revenue requirement is based on (i) a fixed ROE for 2018 of 8.6% excluding any performance adjustment, (ii) a ROE for 2019 calculated in accordance with PEP, excluding the performance adjustment, (iii) for future years, a performance-based ROE calculated pursuant to PEP, and (iv) amortization periods for the related regulatory assets and liabilities of eight years and six years, respectively. The revenue requirement also reflects a disallowance related to a portion of Mississippi Power's investment in the Kemper County energy facility requested for inclusion in rate base, which was recorded in the fourth quarter 2017 as an additional charge to income of approximately $78 million ($85 million net of accumulated depreciation of $7 million) pre-tax ($48 million after tax).
Under the Kemper Settlement Agreement, retail customer rates reflect a reduction of approximately $26.8 million annually, effective with the first billing cycle of April 2018, and include comparativeno recovery for costs associated with the gasifier portion of the Kemper County energy facility in 2018 or at any future date.

MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS (continued)
Mississippi Power Company 2018 Annual Report

Reserve Margin Plan
On August 6, 2018, Mississippi Power filed its proposed Reserve Margin Plan (RMP), as required by the Mississippi PSC's order in the Kemper Settlement Docket. Under the RMP, Mississippi Power proposed alternatives that would reduce its reserve margin, with the most economic of the alternatives being the two-year and seven-year acceleration of the retirement of Plant Watson Units 4 and 5, respectively, to the first quarter 2022 and the four-year acceleration of the retirement of Plant Greene County Units 1 and 2 to the third quarter 2021 and the third quarter 2022, respectively, in order to lower or avoid operating costs. The Plant Greene County unit retirements would require the completion by Alabama Power of proposed transmission and system reliability improvements, as well as agreement by Alabama Power. The RMP filing also states that, in the event the Mississippi PSC ultimately approves an alternative that includes an accelerated retirement, Mississippi Power would require authorization to defer in a regulatory asset for future recovery the remaining net book value of the units at the time of retirement. A decision by the Mississippi PSC that does not include recovery of the remaining book value of any generating units retired could have a material impact on Mississippi Power's financial statements. The ultimate outcome of this matter cannot be determined at this time.
Lignite Mine and CO2 Pipeline Facilities
Mississippi Power owns the lignite mine and equipment and mineral reserves located around the Kemper County energy facility site. The mine started commercial operation in June 2013.
In 2010, Mississippi Power executed a 40-year management fee contract with Liberty Fuels Company, LLC (Liberty Fuels), a wholly-owned subsidiary of The North American Coal Corporation, which developed, constructed, and is responsible for the mining operations through the end of the mine reclamation. As the mining permit holder, Liberty Fuels has a legal obligation to perform mine reclamation and Mississippi Power has a contractual obligation to fund all reclamation activities. As a result of the abandonment of the Kemper IGCC, final mine reclamation began in 2018 and is expected to be substantially completed in 2020, with monitoring expected to continue through 2027. See Note 6 to the financial statements and Note 7 to the financial statements under "Mississippi Power" for additional information.
In addition, Mississippi Power constructed the CO2 pipeline for the planned transport of captured CO2 for use in enhanced oil recovery and entered into an agreement with Denbury Onshore (Denbury) to purchase the captured CO2. The agreement with Denbury was terminated in December 2018 and did not have a material impact on Mississippi Power's results of operations. Mississippi Power is currently evaluating its options regarding the final disposition of the CO2 pipeline, including removal of the pipeline. This evaluation is expected to be complete later in 2019. If Mississippi Power ultimately decides to remove the CO2 pipeline, the cost of removal would have a material impact on Mississippi Power's financial statements. The ultimate outcome of this matter cannot be determined at this time.
For additional information on the Kemper County energy facility, see Note 2 to the financial statements under "Mississippi PowerKemper County Energy Facility."
Government Grants
In 2010, the DOE, through a cooperative agreement with SCS, agreed to fund $270 million of the Kemper County energy facility through the grants awarded to the project by the DOE under the Clean Coal Power Initiative Round 2. Through December 31, 2018, Mississippi Power received total DOE grants of $387 million, of which $382 million reduced the construction costs of the Kemper County energy facility and $5 million reimbursed Mississippi Power for expenses associated with DOE reporting. On December 12, 2018, Mississippi Power filed with the DOE its request for property closeout certification under the contract related to the grants received. Mississippi Power and the DOE are currently in discussions regarding the requested closeout and property disposition, which may require payment to the DOE for a portion of certain property that is to be retained by Mississippi Power. The ultimate outcome of this matter cannot be determined at this time; however, it could have a material impact on Mississippi Power's financial statement line itemsstatements.
Income Tax Matters
Federal Tax Reform Legislation
In December 2017, the Tax Reform Legislation was signed into law and became effective on January 1, 2018. The Tax Reform Legislation, among other things, reduced the federal corporate income tax rate to 21%, retained normalization provisions for public utility property and existing renewable energy incentives, and repealed the corporate alternative minimum tax. In addition, under current guidance.the Tax Reform Legislation, NOLs generated after December 31, 2017 can no longer be carried back to previous tax years but can be carried forward indefinitely, with utilization limited to 80% of taxable income of the subsequent tax year. The projected reduction of Southern Company's consolidated income tax liability resulting from the tax rate reduction also delays the expected

MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS (continued)
Mississippi Power Company 2018 Annual Report

utilization of existing tax credit carryforwards. See Note 10 to the financial statements for information on Southern Company's joint consolidated income tax allocation agreement.
Following the enactment of the Tax Reform Legislation, the SEC staff issued Staff Accounting Bulletin 118 – "Income Tax Accounting Implications of the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act" (SAB 118), which provided for a measurement period of up to one year from the enactment date to complete accounting under GAAP for the tax effects of the legislation. Due to the complex and comprehensive nature of the enacted tax law changes and their application under GAAP, Mississippi Power considered all amounts recorded in the financial statements as a result of the Tax Reform Legislation "provisional" as discussed in SAB 118 and subject to revision prior to filing its 2017 tax return in the fourth quarter 2018. Mississippi Power recognized tax expense of $372 million in 2017. Following the filing of its 2017 tax return, Mississippi Power recorded tax benefits of $35 million to adjust the provisional amount for a total net tax expense of $337 million as a result of the Tax Reform Legislation. In addition, in total, Mississippi Power recorded an $11 million increase in regulatory assets and a $395 million increase in regulatory liabilities as a result of the Tax Reform Legislation and $1 million of stranded excess deferred tax balances in AOCI at December 31, 2017 were adjusted through retained earnings in 2018. As of December 31, 2018, Mississippi Power considered the measurement of impacts from the Tax Reform Legislation on deferred income tax assets and liabilities, primarily due to the impact of the reduction of the corporate income tax rate, to be complete.
However, the IRS continues to issue regulations that provide further interpretation and guidance on the law and each state's adoption of ASC 606 didthe provisions contained in the Tax Reform Legislation remains uncertain. In addition, the regulatory treatment of certain impacts of the Tax Reform Legislation is subject to the discretion of the FERC and the Mississippi PSC. The ultimate impact of this matter cannot be determined at this time. See Note 2 to the financial statements for additional information regarding the PEP Settlement Agreement and the ECO Settlement Agreement, which reflect certain impacts of the Tax Reform Legislation. Also see FINANCIAL CONDITION AND LIQUIDITY – "Credit Rating Risk" herein and Note 10 to the financial statements under "Current and Deferred Income Taxes" for additional information.
Bonus Depreciation
Under the Tax Reform Legislation, projects with binding contracts prior to September 28, 2017 and placed in service after September 27, 2017 remain eligible for bonus depreciation under the PATH Act. The PATH Act allowed for 50% bonus depreciation for 2015 through 2017, 40% bonus depreciation for 2018, and 30% bonus depreciation for 2019 and certain long-lived assets placed in service in 2020. Based on provisional estimates, bonus depreciation is expected to result in positive cash flows of approximately $10 million for the 2018 tax year and Mississippi Power does not expect material positive cash flows from bonus depreciation for the 2019 tax year. See Note 10 to the financial statements under "Current and Deferred Income Taxes" for additional information. The ultimate outcome of this matter cannot be determined at this time.
Other Matters
Mississippi Power is involved in various other matters being litigated and regulatory matters that could affect future earnings. In addition, Mississippi Power is subject to certain claims and legal actions arising in the ordinary course of business. Mississippi Power's business activities are subject to extensive governmental regulation related to public health and the environment, such as laws and regulations governing air, water, land, and protection of other natural resources. Litigation over environmental issues and claims of various types, including property damage, personal injury, common law nuisance, and citizen enforcement of environmental laws and regulations, has occurred throughout the U.S. This litigation has included claims for damages alleged to have been caused by CO2 and other emissions, CCR, and alleged exposure to hazardous materials, and/or requests for injunctive relief in connection with such matters.
The ultimate outcome of such pending or potential litigation or regulatory matters cannot be predicted at this time; however, for current proceedings not specifically reported herein or in Notes 2 and 3 to the financial statements, management does not anticipate that the ultimate liabilities, if any, arising from such current proceedings would have a material effect on Mississippi Power's financial statements. See Notes 2 and 3 to the financial statements for a discussion of various other contingencies, regulatory matters, and other matters being litigated which may affect future earnings potential.
To mitigate customer rate impacts associated with rising costs and declining sales, Mississippi Power management approved an employee attrition plan on July 13, 2018. In 2018, Mississippi Power recorded $16 million in expenses related to this plan.
On October 2, 2018, the Mississippi PSC approved the executed agreements between Mississippi Power and its largest retail customer, Chevron, for Mississippi Power to continue providing retail service to the Chevron refinery in Pascagoula, Mississippi through 2038. The new agreements are not expected to have a material impact on earnings.
In conjunction with Southern Company's sale of Gulf Power, Mississippi Power and Gulf Power have committed to seek a restructuring of their 50% undivided ownership interests in Plant Daniel such that each of them would, after the restructuring,

MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS (continued)
Mississippi Power Company 2018 Annual Report

own 100% of a generating unit. On January 15, 2019, Gulf Power provided notice to Mississippi Power that Gulf Power will retire its share of the generating capacity of Plant Daniel on January 15, 2024. Mississippi Power has the option to purchase Gulf Power's ownership interest for $1 on January 15, 2024, provided that Mississippi Power exercises the option no later than 120 days prior to that date. Mississippi Power is assessing the potential operational and economic effects of Gulf Power's notice. The ultimate outcome of these matters remains subject to completion of Mississippi Power's evaluations and applicable regulatory approvals, including the FERC and the Mississippi PSC, and cannot now be determined. See Note 15 to the financial statements under "Southern Company's Sale of Gulf Power" for information regarding the sale of Gulf Power.
Litigation
On May 18, 2018, Southern Company and Mississippi Power received a notice of dispute and arbitration demand filed by Martin Product Sales, LLC (Martin) based on two agreements, both related to Kemper IGCC byproducts for which Mississippi Power provided termination notices in September 2017. Martin alleges breach of contract, breach of good faith and fair dealing, fraud and misrepresentation, and civil conspiracy and makes a claim for damages in the amount of approximately $143 million, as well as additional unspecified damages, attorney's fees, costs, and interest. In the first quarter 2019, Mississippi Power and Southern Company filed motions to dismiss.
On November 21, 2018, Ray C. Turnage and 10 other individual plaintiffs filed a putative class action complaint against Mississippi Power and the three current members of the Mississippi PSC in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Mississippi. Mississippi Power received Mississippi PSC approval in 2013 to charge a mirror CWIP rate premised upon including in its rate base pre-construction and construction costs for the Kemper IGCC prior to placing the Kemper IGCC into service. The Mississippi Supreme Court reversed that approval and ordered Mississippi Power to refund the amounts paid by customers under the previously-approved mirror CWIP rate. The plaintiffs allege that the initial approval process, and the amount approved, were improper. They also allege that Mississippi Power underpaid customers in the refund process because it applied the wrong interest rate to the payments. The plaintiffs seek to recover, on behalf of themselves and their putative class, actual damages, punitive damages, pre-judgment interest, post-judgment interest, attorney's fees, and costs.
Mississippi Power believes these legal challenges have no merit; however, an adverse outcome in either of these proceedings could have a material impact on Mississippi Power's results of operations, financial condition, and liquidity. Mississippi Power will vigorously defend itself in these matters, the ultimate outcome of which cannot be determined at this time.
See Note 2 to the financial statements under "Kemper County Energy Facility" for additional information.
ACCOUNTING POLICIES
Application of Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates
Mississippi Power prepares its financial statements in accordance with GAAP. Significant accounting policies are described in Notes 1, 5, and 6 to the financial statements. In the application of these policies, certain estimates are made that may have a material impact on Mississippi Power's results of operations and related disclosures. Different assumptions and measurements could produce estimates that are significantly different from those recorded in the financial statements. Senior management has reviewed and discussed the following critical accounting policies and estimates with the Audit Committee of Southern Company's Board of Directors.
Utility Regulation
Mississippi Power is subject to retail regulation by the Mississippi PSC and wholesale regulation by the FERC. These regulatory agencies set the rates Mississippi Power is permitted to charge customers based on allowable costs. As a result, Mississippi Power applies accounting standards which require the financial statements to reflect the effects of rate regulation. Through the ratemaking process, the regulators may require the inclusion of costs or revenues in periods different than when they would be recognized by a non-regulated company. This treatment may result in the deferral of expenses and the recording of related regulatory assets based on anticipated future recovery through rates or the deferral of gains or creation of liabilities and the recording of related regulatory liabilities. The application of the accounting standards has a further effect on Mississippi Power's financial statements as a result of the estimates of allowable costs used in the ratemaking process. These estimates may differ from those actually incurred by Mississippi Power; therefore, the accounting estimates inherent in specific costs such as depreciation and pension and other postretirement benefits have less of a direct impact on Mississippi Power's results of operations and financial condition than they would on a non-regulated company.
As reflected in Note 2 to the financial statements under "Mississippi PowerRegulatory Assets and Liabilities," significant regulatory assets and liabilities have been recorded. Management reviews the ultimate recoverability of these regulatory assets and any requirement to refund these regulatory liabilities based on applicable regulatory guidelines and GAAP. However, adverse

MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS (continued)
Mississippi Power Company 2018 Annual Report

legislative, judicial, or regulatory actions could materially impact the amounts of such regulatory assets and liabilities and could adversely impact Mississippi Power's financial statements.
Kemper County Energy Facility Closure Costs
For periods prior to the second quarter 2017, significant accounting estimates included Kemper County energy facility estimated construction costs, project completion date, and rate recovery. In the aggregate, Mississippi Power had recorded charges to income of $3.07 billion ($1.89 billion after tax) as a result of changes in the cost estimate above the cost cap for the Kemper IGCC through May 31, 2017, of which $305 million ($188 million after tax) occurred in 2017 and $428 million ($264 million after tax) occurred in 2016.
On June 21, 2017, the Mississippi PSC stated its intent to issue an order (which occurred on July 6, 2017) directing Mississippi Power to pursue a settlement under which the Kemper County energy facility would be operated as a natural gas plant rather than an IGCC plant; therefore, Mississippi Power suspended the operation and start-up of the gasifier portion of the Kemper County energy facility on June 28, 2017.
As a result of these events, cost recovery of the gasification portions became no longer probable; therefore, Mississippi Power recorded an additional charge to income in June 2017 of $2.8 billion ($2.0 billion after tax), which included estimated costs associated with the gasification portions of the plant and lignite mine. During the third and fourth quarters of 2017, Mississippi Power recorded charges to income of $242 million ($206 million after tax), including $164 million for ongoing project costs, estimated mine and gasifier-related costs, and certain termination costs during the suspension period prior to conclusion of the Kemper Settlement Docket, as well as a charge of $78 million associated with the Kemper Settlement Agreement. The estimated construction costs and project completion date were no longer considered significant accounting estimates for 2017 following the suspension and related charges to earnings. In addition, the Kemper Settlement Agreement was approved by the Mississippi PSC on February 6, 2018 and resolved all related cost recovery issues.
In 2018, Mississippi Power recorded pre-tax charges to income of $37 million ($27 million after tax), primarily resulting from the abandonment and related closure activities and ongoing period costs, net of sales proceeds, for the mine and gasifier-related assets at the Kemper County energy facility. Additional closure costs for the mine and gasifier-related assets, currently estimated at up to $10 million pre-tax (excluding salvage, net of dismantlement costs), may be incurred through the first half of 2020. During the fourth quarter 2018, Mississippi Power began evaluating its options regarding the final disposition of the CO2 pipeline, including removal of the pipeline. This evaluation is expected to be complete later in 2019. If Mississippi Power ultimately decides to remove the CO2 pipeline, the cost of removal would have a material impact on Mississippi Power's financial statements. In addition, in December 2018, Mississippi Power filed with the DOE its request for property closeout certification under the contract related to the grants received. Mississippi Power and the DOE are currently in discussions regarding the requested closeout and property disposition, which may require payment to the DOE for a portion of certain property that is to be retained by Mississippi Power and could have a material impact on Mississippi Power's financial statements. Given the significant judgment and uncertainty involved in estimating these remaining costs associated with the abandonment and closure activities for the mine and gasifier-related assets at the Kemper County energy facility, Mississippi Power considers the related liabilities to be critical accounting estimates.
See Note 2 to the financial statements under "Kemper County Energy Facility" for additional information. The ultimate outcome of these matters cannot be determined at this time.
Asset Retirement Obligations
AROs are computed as the fair value of the estimated costs for an asset's future retirement and are recorded in the period in which the liability is incurred. The estimated costs are capitalized as part of the related long-lived asset and depreciated over the asset's useful life. In the absence of quoted market prices, AROs are estimated using present value techniques in which estimates of future cash outlays associated with the asset retirements are discounted using a credit-adjusted risk-free rate. Estimates of the timing and amounts of future cash outlays are based on projections of when and how the assets will be retired and the cost of future removal activities.
The liability for AROs primarily relates to facilities that are subject to the CCR Rule, principally ash ponds. In addition, Mississippi Power has AROs related to various landfill sites, underground storage tanks, water wells, mine reclamation, and asbestos removal.
Mississippi Power also has identified retirement obligations related to certain transmission and distribution facilities and certain wireless communication towers. However, liabilities for the removal of these assets have not been recorded because the settlement timing for the retirement obligations related to these assets is indeterminable and, therefore, the fair value of the retirement obligations cannot be reasonably estimated. A liability for these retirement obligations will be recognized when sufficient

MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS (continued)
Mississippi Power Company 2018 Annual Report

information becomes available to support a reasonable estimation of the retirement obligation. In 2018, Mississippi Power incurred $16 million in ARO revisions, including $11 million at Plant Greene County, which is co-owned with Alabama Power.
The cost estimates for AROs related to the disposal of CCR are based on information using various assumptions related to closure and post-closure costs, timing of future cash outlays, inflation and discount rates, and the potential methods for complying with the CCR Rule requirements for closure. Mississippi Power expects to periodically update its ARO cost estimates. See FUTURE EARNINGS POTENTIAL – "Environmental Matters – Environmental Laws and Regulations – Coal Combustion Residuals" herein and Note 6 to the financial statements for additional information.
Given the significant judgment involved in estimating AROs, Mississippi Power considers the liabilities for AROs to be critical accounting estimates.
Pension and Other Postretirement Benefits
Mississippi Power's calculation of pension and other postretirement benefits expense is dependent on a number of assumptions. These assumptions include discount rates, healthcare cost trend rates, expected long-term return on plan assets, mortality rates, expected salary and wage increases, and other factors. Components of pension and other postretirement benefits expense include interest and service cost on the pension and other postretirement benefit plans, expected return on plan assets, and amortization of certain unrecognized costs and obligations. Actual results that differ from the assumptions utilized are accumulated and amortized over future periods and, therefore, generally affect recognized expense and the recorded obligation in future periods. While Mississippi Power believes that the assumptions used are appropriate, differences in actual experience or significant changes in assumptions would affect its pension and other postretirement benefit costs and obligations.
Key elements in determining Mississippi Power's pension and other postretirement benefit expense are the expected long-term return on plan assets and the discount rate used to measure the benefit plan obligations and the periodic benefit plan expense for future periods. The expected long-term return on pension and other postretirement benefit plan assets is based on Southern Company's investment strategy, historical experience, and expectations for long-term rates of return that consider external actuarial advice. Southern Company determines the long-term return on plan assets by applying the long-term rate of expected returns on various asset classes to Southern Company's target asset allocation. For purposes of determining Mississippi Power's liability related to the pension and other postretirement benefit plans, Southern Company discounts the future related cash flows using a single-point discount rate developed from the weighted average of market-observed yields for high quality fixed income securities with maturities that correspond to expected benefit payments.
A 25 basis point change in any significant assumption (discount rate, salary increases, or long-term rate of return on plan assets) would result in a cumulative-effect adjustment.$1 million or less change in total annual benefit expense, a $19 million or less change in the projected obligation for the pension plan, and a $2 million or less change in the projected obligation for other post retirement benefit plans.
LeasesSee Note 11 to the financial statements for additional information regarding pension and other postretirement benefits.
Contingent Obligations
Mississippi Power is subject to a number of federal and state laws and regulations as well as other factors and conditions that subject it to environmental, litigation, and other risks. See FUTURE EARNINGS POTENTIAL herein and Notes 2 and 3 to the financial statements for more information regarding certain of these contingencies. Mississippi Power periodically evaluates its exposure to such risks and records reserves for those matters where a non-tax-related loss is considered probable and reasonably estimable. The adequacy of reserves can be significantly affected by external events or conditions that can be unpredictable; thus, the ultimate outcome of such matters could materially affect Mississippi Power's results of operations, cash flows, or financial condition.
Recently Issued Accounting Standards
See Note 1 to the financial statements under "Recently Adopted Accounting Standards" for additional information.
In February 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-02, Leases (Topic 842) (ASU 2016-02). ASU 2016-02 requires lessees to recognize on the balance sheet a lease liability and a right-of-use asset for all leases. ASU 2016-02 also changes the recognition, measurement, and presentation of expense associated with leases and provides clarification regarding the identification of certain components of contracts that would represent a lease. The accounting required by lessors is relatively unchanged. ASU 2016-02 is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2018 and the Company will adoptMississippi Power adopted the new standard effective January 1, 2019.
The Company is currently implementing an information technology system along withMississippi Power elected the related changes to internal controls and accounting policies that will supporttransition methodology provided by ASU No. 2018-11, Leases (Topic 842): Targeted Improvements, whereby the accounting for leases under ASU 2016-02. In addition, the Company has substantially completed a detailed inventory and analysis of its leases. In terms of rental charges and duration of contracts, the most significant leases relate to PPAs and cellular towers where the Company is the lessee and to outdoor lighting where the Company is the lessor. The Company is currently analyzing pole attachment agreements, and a lease determination has not been made at this time. While the Company has not yet determined the ultimate impact, adoptionrequirements of ASU 2016-02 is expected to have a significant impact on the Company's balance sheet.
Other
In March 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-09, Compensation-Stock Compensation (Topic 718): Improvements to Employee Share-Based Payment Accounting (ASU 2016-09). ASU 2016-09 changes the accounting for income taxes and the cash flow presentation for share-based payment award transactions effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2016. The new guidance requires all excess tax benefits and deficiencies related to the exercise or vesting of stock compensation to be recognized as income tax expense or benefit in the income statement. Previously, the Company recognized any excess tax benefits and deficiencies related to the exercise and vesting of stock compensation as additional paid-in capital. In addition, the new guidance requires excess tax benefits for share-based payments to be included in net cash provided from operating activities rather than net cash provided from financing activities on the statement of cash flows. The Company elected to adopt the guidance in 2016 and reflect the related adjustments as of January 1, 2016. Prior year's data presented in the financial statements has not been adjusted. The Company also elected to recognize forfeitures as they occur. The new guidance did not have a material impact on the results of operations, financial position, or cash flows of the Company. See Notes 5 and 8 for disclosures impacted by ASU 2016-09.
On March 10, 2017, the FASB issued ASU No. 2017-07, Compensation – Retirement Benefits (Topic 715): Improving the Presentation of Net Periodic Pension Cost and Net Periodic Postretirement Benefit Cost (ASU 2017-07). ASU 2017-07 requires that an employer report the service cost component in the same line item or items as other compensation costs and requires the other components of net periodic pension and postretirement benefit costs to be separately presented in the income statement outside of income from operations. Additionally, only the service cost component is eligible for capitalization, when applicable. However, all cost components remain eligible for capitalization under FERC regulations. ASU 2017-07 will be applied retrospectively for the presentation of the service cost component and the other components of net periodic pension and postretirement benefit costs in the income statement. The capitalization of only the service cost component of net periodic pension and postretirement benefit costs in assets will beare applied on a prospective basis. ASU 2017-07 is effective for periods beginning after December 15, 2017. The presentation changes required for net periodic pension and postretirement benefit costs will result in a decrease inbasis as of the Company's operating income and an increase in other income for 2016 and 2017 and are expected to result in a decrease in operating income and an increase in other income for 2018. The Company adopted ASU 2017-07 effectiveadoption date of January 1, 2018 with no material impact on its financial statements.
On August 28, 2017,2019, without restating prior periods. Mississippi Power elected the FASB issuedpackage of practical expedients provided by ASU No. 2017-12, Derivatives and Hedging (Topic 815): Targeted Improvements to Accounting for Hedging Activities (ASU 2017-12), amending the hedge accounting recognition and presentation requirements. ASU 2017-12 makes more financial and non-financial hedging strategies eligible for hedge accounting, amends the related presentation and disclosure requirements, and simplifies hedge effectiveness assessment requirements. ASU 2017-12 is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2018, with early adoption permitted. The Company adopted ASU 2017-12 effective January 1, 2018 with no material impact on its financial statements.2016-02
    Table of Contents                                Index to Financial Statements

NOTESMANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS (continued)
GeorgiaMississippi Power Company 20172018 Annual Report

Affiliate Transactionsthat allows prior determinations of whether existing contracts are, or contain, leases and the classification of existing leases to continue without reassessment. Additionally, Mississippi Power applied the use-of-hindsight practical expedient in determining lease terms as of the date of adoption and elected the practical expedient that allows existing land easements not previously accounted for as leases not to be reassessed. Mississippi Power also made accounting policy elections to account for short-term leases in all asset classes as off-balance sheet leases and combined lease and non-lease components in the computations of lease obligations and right-of-use assets for most asset classes.
The Company has an agreementMississippi Power completed the implementation of a new application to track and account for its leases and updated its internal controls and accounting policies to support the accounting for leases under ASU 2016-02. Mississippi Power completed its lease inventory and determined its most significant leases involve equipment and railcar leases. In the first quarter 2019, adoption of ASU 2016-02 did not have a material impact on Mississippi Power's balance sheet or statement of income.
FINANCIAL CONDITION AND LIQUIDITY
Overview
Earnings for all periods presented were negatively affected by charges associated with SCS under which the following services are renderedKemper IGCC. See FUTURE EARNINGS POTENTIAL – "Kemper County Energy Facility" herein and Note 2 to the Companyfinancial statements for additional information.
Mississippi Power's financial condition remained stable at direct or allocated cost: generalDecember 31, 2018. Mississippi Power's cash requirements primarily consist of funding ongoing operations, common stock dividends, capital expenditures, and design engineering, operations, purchasing, accounting, finance and treasury, tax, information technology, marketing, auditing, insurance and pension administration, human resources, systems and procedures, digital wireless communications,debt maturities. Capital expenditures and other servicesinvesting activities include investments to maintain existing generation facilities, to comply with respectenvironmental regulations including adding environmental modifications to businesscertain existing generating units and operations, construction management,closures of ash ponds, to expand and power pool transactions. Costsimprove transmission and distribution facilities, and for these services amountedrestoration following major storms. Operating cash flows provide a substantial portion of Mississippi Power's cash needs. For the three-year period from 2019 through 2021, Mississippi Power's projected common stock dividends, capital expenditures, and debt maturities are expected to $625exceed operating cash flows. Mississippi Power plans to finance future cash needs in excess of its operating cash flows primarily through external securities issuances, borrowings from financial institutions, including commercial paper to the extent Mississippi Power is eligible to participate, and equity contributions from Southern Company. Mississippi Power intends to continue to monitor its access to short-term and long-term capital markets as well as its bank credit arrangements to meet future capital and liquidity needs. See "Sources of Capital," "Financing Activities," and "Capital Requirements and Contractual Obligations" herein for additional information.
Mississippi Power's investments in the qualified pension plan decreased in value as of December 31, 2018 as compared to December 31, 2017. No contributions to the qualified pension plan were made for the year ended December 31, 2018 and no mandatory contributions to the qualified pension plan are anticipated during 2019. See Note 11 to the financial statements under "Pension Plans" for additional information.
Net cash provided from operating activities totaled $804 million $606for 2018, an increase of $301 million as compared to 2017. The increase in cash provided from operating activities in 2018 was primarily related to increased income tax refunds in 2018 primarily related to the tax abandonment of the Kemper IGCC. Net cash provided from operating activities totaled $503 million for 2017, an increase of $274 million as compared to 2016. The increase in cash provided from operating activities in 2017 was primarily due to tax refunds associated with the Section 174 R&E settlement, largely offset by a decrease in income taxes related to the Kemper County energy facility and the Tax Reform Legislation.
Net cash used for investing activities in 2018, 2017, and 2016 totaled $232 million, $504 million, and $585$697 million, respectively. The cash used for investing activities in 2018 was primarily due to gross property additions related to other production, distribution, transmission, and steam production. The cash used for investing activities in 2017 and 2016 was primarily due to gross property additions related to the Kemper County energy facility. The cash used for investing activities in 2016 was partially offset by the receipt of Additional DOE Grants.
Net cash used for financing activities totaled $527 million in 2018 primarily due to redemption of preferred stock, long-term debt, short-term borrowings, and senior notes, partially offset by the issuance of senior notes and short-term borrowings. Net cash provided from financing activities totaled $25 million in 2017 2016, and 2015, respectively. Cost allocation methodologies used by SCS prior to the repeal of the Public Utility Holding Company Act of 1935, as amended, were approved by the SEC. Subsequently, additional cost allocation methodologies have been reported to the FERC and management believes they are reasonable. The FERC permits services to be rendered at cost by system service companies. See Note 7 under "Operating Leases" for information on leases of cellular tower space for the Company's digital wireless communications equipment.
The Company has an agreement with Southern Nuclear under which the following nuclear-related services are rendered to the Company at cost: general executive and advisory services; general operations, management, and technical services; administrative services including procurement, accounting, employee relations, systems, and procedures services; strategic planning and budgeting services; and other services with respect to business, operations, and construction management. Costs for these services amounted to $675 million, $666 million, and $681 million in 2017, 2016, and 2015, respectively. See Note 3 under "Retail Regulatory Matters – Nuclear Construction" for additional information.
The Company has entered into several PPAs with Southern Power for capacity and energy. Expenses associated with these PPAs were $235 million, $265 million, and $179 million in 2017, 2016, and 2015, respectively. See Note 6 under "Capital Leases" and Note 7 under "Fuel and Purchased Power Agreements" for additional information.
The Company has a joint ownership agreement with Gulf Power under which Gulf Power owns a 25% portion of Plant Scherer Unit 3. Under this agreement, the Company operates Plant Scherer Unit 3 and Gulf Power reimburses the Company for its 25% proportionate share of the related non-fuel expenses, which were $11 million, $8 million, and $12 million in 2017, 2016, and 2015, respectively. See Note 4 for additional information.
In 2014, prior to Southern Company's acquisition of PowerSecure on May 9, 2016, the Company entered into agreements with PowerSecure to build solar power generation facilities at two U.S. Army bases, as approved by the Georgia PSC. In October 2016, the two facilities began commercial operation. Payments of $119 million made by the Company to PowerSecure under the agreements since 2014 are included in utility plant in service at December 31, 2017.
On September 1, 2016, Southern Company Gas acquired a 50% equity interest in Southern Natural Gas Company, L.L.C. (SNG). Prior to completion of the acquisition, SCS, as agent for the Company, had entered into a long-term interstate natural gas transportation agreement with SNG. The interstate transportation service provided to the Company by SNG pursuant to this agreement is governed by the terms and conditions of SNG's natural gas tariff and is subject to FERC regulation. Transportation costs under this agreement were $102 million in 2017 and $35 million for the period subsequent to Southern Company Gas' investment in SNG through December 31, 2016.
Prior to Southern Company's acquisition of Southern Company Gas, SCS, as agent for the Company, had agreements with certain subsidiaries of Southern Company Gas to purchase natural gas. Natural gas purchases made by the Companyprimarily from capital contributions from Southern Company, Gas' subsidiaries were $22largely offset by redemptions of long-term debt and short-term borrowings. Net cash provided from financing activities totaled $594 million in 20172016 primarily due to long-term debt financings and $10 million for the period subsequent to Southern Company's acquisition ofcapital contributions from Southern Company, Gas through December 31, 2016.partially offset by a decrease in short-term borrowings and redemptions of long-term debt.
The Company provides incidental servicesSignificant balance sheet changes in 2018 included increases of $442 million in long-term debt primarily due to and receives such services from other Southern Company subsidiaries which are generally minorthe issuance of senior notes, a net change of $475 million in duration and amount. Except as described herein,accumulated deferred income taxes primarily due to the Company neither provided nor received any material services to or from affiliates in 2017, 2016, or 2015.
The traditional electric operating companies, includingtax abandonment of the Company, and Southern Power may jointly enter into various types of wholesale energy, natural gas, and certain other contracts, either directly or through SCS as agent. Each participating company may be jointly and severally liable for the obligations incurred under these agreements. See Note 7 under "Fuel and Purchased Power Agreements" for additional information.
Regulatory Assets and Liabilities
The Company is subject to accounting requirements for the effects of rate regulation. Regulatory assets represent probable future revenues associated with certain costs that are expected to be recovered from customers through the ratemaking process. Regulatory liabilities represent probable future reductions in revenues associated with amounts that are expected to be credited to customers through the ratemaking process.
    Table of Contents                                Index to Financial Statements

NOTESMANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS (continued)
GeorgiaMississippi Power Company 20172018 Annual Report

RegulatoryKemper IGCC, and a decrease of $949 million in securities due within one year primarily due to the repayment of a $900 million unsecured term loan. See "Financing Activities" herein and Notes 8 and 10 to the financial statements for additional information.
Mississippi Power's ratio of common equity to total capitalization plus short-term debt was 50% and 39% at December 31, 2018 and 2017, respectively. The increase was primarily due to repayment of debt obligations in 2018. See Note 8 to the financial statements for additional information.
Sources of Capital
Mississippi Power plans to obtain the funds to meet its future capital needs from operating cash flows, external securities issuances, borrowings from financial institutions, including commercial paper to the extent Mississippi Power is eligible to participate, and equity contributions from Southern Company. However, the amount, type, and timing of any future financing, if needed, will depend upon prevailing market conditions, regulatory approval, and other factors.
The issuance of securities by Mississippi Power is subject to regulatory approval by the FERC. Additionally, with respect to the public offering of securities, Mississippi Power files registration statements with the SEC under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended. The amounts of securities authorized by the FERC, as well as the securities registered under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, are continuously monitored and appropriate filings are made to ensure flexibility in raising capital. Any future financing through secured debt would also require approval by the Mississippi PSC.
Mississippi Power obtains financing separately without credit support from any affiliate. See Note 8 to the financial statements under "Bank Credit Arrangements" for additional information. The Southern Company system does not maintain a centralized cash or money pool. Therefore, funds of Mississippi Power are not commingled with funds of any other company in the Southern Company system.
Mississippi Power's current liabilities sometimes exceed current assets because of long-term debt maturities and (liabilities) reflectedthe periodic use of short-term debt as a funding source, as well as significant seasonal fluctuations in cash needs. At December 31, 2018, Mississippi Power had approximately $293 million of cash and cash equivalents. Committed credit arrangements with banks at December 31, 2018 were $100 million, all of which is unused. In October 2018, Mississippi Power amended its one-year credit arrangements in an aggregate amount of $100 million to extend the maturity dates from 2018 to 2019.
See Note 8 to the financial statements under "Bank Credit Arrangements" for additional information.
All of these bank credit arrangements contain covenants that limit debt levels and typically contain cross acceleration provisions to other indebtedness (including guarantee obligations) of Mississippi Power. Such cross-acceleration provisions to other indebtedness would trigger an event of default if Mississippi Power defaulted on indebtedness, the payment of which was then accelerated. At December 31, 2018, Mississippi Power was in compliance with all such covenants. None of the bank credit arrangements contain material adverse change clauses at the time of borrowing.
Subject to applicable market conditions, Mississippi Power expects to renew or replace its credit arrangements as needed, prior to expiration. In connection therewith, Mississippi Power may extend the maturity dates and/or increase or decrease the lending commitments thereunder.
A portion of the $100 million unused credit arrangements with banks is allocated to provide liquidity support to Mississippi Power's revenue bonds. The amount of variable rate revenue bonds outstanding requiring liquidity support at December 31, 2018 was approximately $40 million.
Short-term borrowings are included in notes payable in the balance sheets at December 31 relate to:sheets. Details of short-term borrowing were as follows:
 2017 2016 Note
 (in millions)  
Retiree benefit plans$1,313
 $1,348
 (a, k)
Asset retirement obligations945
 893
 (b, k)
Deferred income tax charges521
 681
 (b, c, k)
Storm damage reserves333
 206
 (d)
Remaining net book value of retired assets146
 166
 (e)
Loss on reacquired debt127
 137
 (f, k)
Other regulatory assets119
 97
 (g)
Vacation pay91
 91
 (h, k)
Other cost of removal obligations40
 3
 (b)
Cancelled construction projects36
 44
 (i)
Deferred income tax credits(3,248) (121) (b, c)
Other regulatory liabilities(191) (39) (j, k)
Total regulatory assets (liabilities), net$232
 $3,506
  
Note: The recovery and amortization periods for these regulatory assets and (liabilities) are as follows:
 Short-term Debt at the End of the Period 
Short-term Debt During the Period (*)
 Amount Outstanding Weighted Average Interest Rate Average Outstanding Weighted Average Interest Rate Maximum Amount Outstanding
 (in millions)   (in millions)   (in millions)
December 31, 2018$
 % $68
 2.0% $300
December 31, 2017$4
 3.8% $18
 3.0% $36
December 31, 2016$23
 2.6% $112
 2.0% $500
(a)(*)RecoveredAverage and amortized overmaximum amounts are based upon daily balances during the average remaining service period which may range up to 14 years. See Note 2 for additional information.
(b)Asset retirement and other cost of removal obligations and deferred income tax assets are recovered and deferred income tax liabilities are amortized over the related property lives, which may range up to 65 years. Asset retirement and removal liabilities will be settled and trued up following completion of the related activities. Included in the deferred income tax assets is $21 million for the retiree Medicare drug subsidy, which is recovered and amortized, as approved by the Georgia PSC, through 2022.
(c)As a result of Tax Reform Legislation, these balances include $145 million of deferred income tax assets related to CWIP for Plant Vogtle Units 3 and 4 and $626 million of deferred income tax liabilities, neither of which are subject to normalization. The recovery and amortization of these amounts will be determined by the Georgia PSC. See Note 3 under "Retail Regulatory Matters – Rate Plans" and Note 5 for additional information.
(d)Previous under-recovery as of December 2013 is recorded and recovered or amortized as approved by the Georgia PSC through 2019. Amortization of $319 million related to the under-recovery from January 2014 through December 2017 is expected to be determined by the Georgia PSC in the 2019 base rate case. See Note 3 under "Retail Regulatory Matters – Storm Damage Recovery" for additional information.
(e)Amortized as approved by the Georgia PSC over12-month periods not exceeding 10 years or through 2024. The net book value of Plant Mitchell Unit 3 atended December 31, 2018, 2017, was $10 million, which will continue to be amortized through December 31, 2019 as provided in the 2013 ARP. Amortization of the remaining net book value of Plant Mitchell Unit 3 at December 31, 2019, which is expected to be approximately $4 million, and $31 million related to obsolete inventories of certain retired units is expected to be determined by the Georgia PSC in the 2019 base rate case. See Note 3 under "Retail Regulatory Matters – Integrated Resource Plan" for additional information.
(f)Recovered over either the remaining life of the original issue or, if refinanced, over the remaining life of the new issue, which currently does not exceed 35 years.
(g)Comprised of several components including deferred nuclear outages, environmental remediation, building lease, demand-side management tariff under-recovery, and fuel-hedging losses. Deferred nuclear outages are recorded and recovered or amortized over the outage cycles of each nuclear unit, which does not exceed 24 months. The building lease is recorded and recovered or amortized as approved by the Georgia PSC through 2020. The amortization of environmental remediation and demand-side management tariff under-recovery of $54 million at December 31, 2017 is expected to be determined by the Georgia PSC in the 2019 base rate case. Fuel-hedging losses are recovered through the Company's fuel cost recovery mechanism upon final settlement.
(h)Recorded as earned by employees and recovered as paid, generally within one year. This includes both vacation and banked holiday pay.
(i)Costs associated with construction of environmental controls that will not be completed as a result of unit retirements are being amortized as approved by the Georgia PSC over periods not exceeding nine years or through 2022.
(j)Comprised of certain customer refunds and fuel-hedging gains. As ordered by the Georgia PSC on January 11, 2018, approximately $188 million of the proceeds pursuant to the Toshiba Guarantee will be refunded to customers in 2018. Fuel-hedging gains are refunded through the Company's fuel cost recovery mechanism upon final settlement. See Note 3 under "Nuclear Construction" for additional information on the customer refunds related to the Toshiba Guarantee.
(k)Generally not earning a return as they are excluded from rate base or are offset in rate base by a corresponding asset or liability.2016.

MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS (continued)
Mississippi Power Company 2018 Annual Report

Mississippi Power believes the need for working capital can be adequately met by utilizing lines of credit, short-term bank notes, commercial paper to the extent Mississippi Power is eligible to participate, and operating cash flows.
Financing Activities
In March 2018, Mississippi Power issued $300 million aggregate principal amount of Series 2018A Floating Rate Senior Notes due March 27, 2020 bearing interest based on three-month LIBOR and $300 million aggregate principal amount of Series 2018B 3.95% Senior Notes due March 30, 2028. In March 2018, Mississippi Power also entered into a $300 million short-term floating rate bank loan bearing interest based on one-month LIBOR, of which $200 million was repaid in the second quarter 2018 and $100 million was repaid in the third quarter 2018. Mississippi Power used the proceeds from these financings to repay a $900 million unsecured floating rate term loan.
In July 2018, Mississippi Power purchased and held approximately $43 million aggregate principal amount of Mississippi Business Finance Corporation Pollution Control Revenue Refunding Bonds, Series 2002. Mississippi Power may reoffer these bonds to the public at a later date.
In October 2018, Mississippi Power completed the redemption of all 334,210 outstanding shares of its preferred stock (as well as related depositary shares), with an aggregate par value of approximately $33.4 million; all $30 million aggregate principal amount outstanding of its Series G 5.40% Senior Notes due July 1, 2035; and all $125 million aggregate principal amount outstanding of its Series 2009A 5.55% Senior Notes due March 1, 2019.
In December 2018, Southern Company made equity contributions totaling $17 million to Mississippi Power.
In addition to any financings that may be necessary to meet capital requirements and contractual obligations, Mississippi Power plans, when economically feasible, to retire higher-cost securities and replace these obligations with lower-cost capital if market conditions permit.
Credit Rating Risk
At December 31, 2018, Mississippi Power does not have any credit arrangements that would require material changes in payment schedules or terminations as a result of a credit rating downgrade.
On October 2, 2018, the Mississippi PSC approved executed agreements between Mississippi Power and its largest retail customer, Chevron, for Mississippi Power to continue providing retail service to the Chevron refinery in Pascagoula, Mississippi through 2038. The agreements grant Chevron a security interest in the co-generation assets, with a net book value of approximately $101 million at December 31, 2018, located at the refinery that is exercisable upon the occurrence of (i) certain bankruptcy events or (ii) other events of default coupled with specific reductions in steam output at the facility and a downgrade of Mississippi Power's credit rating to below investment grade by two of the three rating agencies.
There are certain contracts that have required or could require collateral, but not accelerated payment, in the event of a credit rating change to BBB and/or Baa2 or below. These contracts are for physical electricity purchases and sales, fuel transportation and storage, energy price risk management, and transmission. At December 31, 2018, the maximum potential collateral requirements at a rating below BBB- and/or Baa3 equaled approximately $283 million.
Included in these amounts are certain agreements that could require collateral in the event that either Alabama Power or Georgia Power (affiliate companies of Mississippi Power) has a portioncredit rating change to below investment grade. Generally, collateral may be provided by a Southern Company guaranty, letter of credit, or cash. Additionally, a credit rating downgrade could impact the ability of Mississippi Power to access capital markets and would be likely to impact the cost at which it does so.
On February 26, 2018, Moody's revised its rating outlook for Mississippi Power from stable to positive. On August 8, 2018, Moody's upgraded Mississippi Power's senior unsecured rating to Baa3 from Ba1 and maintained the positive rating outlook.
On February 28, 2018, Fitch removed Mississippi Power from rating watch negative and revised its rating outlook from stable to positive.
On March 14, 2018, S&P upgraded the senior unsecured long-term debt rating of Mississippi Power to A- from BBB+. The outlook remained negative.
As a result of the Company'sTax Reform Legislation, certain financial metrics, such as the funds from operations to debt percentage, used by the credit rating agencies to assess Southern Company and its subsidiaries, including Mississippi Power, may be negatively impacted. The PEP Settlement Agreement is no longer subjectexpected to applicable accounting rules for rate regulation,help mitigate these potential adverse impacts by allowing Mississippi Power to retain the Company would be required to write off to income or reclassify to accumulated OCI related regulatory assets and liabilities that are not specifically recoverable through regulated rates.excess deferred taxes resulting from the Tax Reform Legislation until the conclusion of the Mississippi Power 2019 Base Rate Case. In addition, Mississippi Power has committed to seek equity contributions sufficient to restore its equity ratio to the Company would be required to determine if any impairment to other assets, including plant, exists and write down the assets, if impaired, to their fair values. All regulatory assets and liabilities are to be reflected in rates.50% target. See Note 32 to the financial statements under "Retail Regulatory Matters""Mississippi Power" for additional information.
    Table of Contents                                Index to Financial Statements

NOTESMANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS (continued)
GeorgiaMississippi Power Company 20172018 Annual Report

RevenuesMarket Price Risk
Wholesale capacity revenues from PPAs are recognized either on a levelized basis over the appropriate contract period or the amount billable under the contract terms. EnergyDue to cost-based rate regulation and other revenuesvarious cost recovery mechanisms, Mississippi Power continues to have limited exposure to market volatility in interest rates, commodity fuel prices, and prices of electricity. To manage the volatility attributable to these exposures, Mississippi Power nets the exposures, where possible, to take advantage of natural offsets and enters into various derivative transactions for the remaining exposures pursuant to Mississippi Power's policies in areas such as counterparty exposure and risk management practices. Mississippi Power's policy is that derivatives are recognizedto be used primarily for hedging purposes and mandates strict adherence to all applicable risk management policies. Derivative positions are monitored using techniques that include, but are not limited to, market valuation, value at risk, stress testing, and sensitivity analysis.
To mitigate future exposure to a change in interest rates, Mississippi Power may enter into derivatives that have been designated as serviceshedges. The weighted average interest rate on $340 million of long-term variable interest rate exposure at December 31, 2018 was 3.32%. If Mississippi Power sustained a 100 basis point change in interest rates for all long-term variable interest rate exposure, the change would have an immaterial effect on annualized interest expense at December 31, 2018. See Note 1 to the financial statements under "Financial Instruments" and Note 14 to the financial statements for additional information.
To mitigate residual risks relative to movements in electricity prices, Mississippi Power enters into physical fixed-price contracts for the purchase and sale of electricity through the wholesale electricity market and, to a lesser extent, financial hedge contracts for natural gas purchases. Mississippi Power continues to manage retail fuel-hedging programs implemented per the guidelines of the Mississippi PSC and wholesale fuel-hedging programs under agreements with wholesale customers. Mississippi Power had no material change in market risk exposure for the year ended December 31, 2018 when compared to the year ended December 31, 2017.
The changes in fair value of energy-related derivative contracts are provided. Unbilled revenuessubstantially attributable to both the volume and the price of natural gas. For the years ended December 31, the changes in fair value of energy-related derivative contracts, the majority of which are composed of regulatory hedges, were as follows:
 
2018
Changes
 
2017
Changes
 Fair Value
 (in millions)
Contracts outstanding at the beginning of the period, assets (liabilities), net$(7) $(7)
Contracts realized or settled3
 8
Current period changes(*)
(2) (8)
Contracts outstanding at the end of the period, assets (liabilities), net$(6) $(7)
(*)Current period changes also include the changes in fair value of new contracts entered into during the period, if any.
The net hedge volumes of energy-related derivative contracts at December 31, 2018 and 2017 were as follows:
 2018 2017
 mmBtu Volume
 (in millions)
Natural gas options3
 
Natural gas swaps60
 53
Total hedge volume63
 53
For natural gas hedges, the weighted average swap contract cost above market prices was approximately $0.10 per mmBtu at December 31, 2018 and $0.14 per mmBtu at December 31, 2017. The options outstanding were immaterial for the reporting periods presented. The costs associated with natural gas hedges are recovered through Mississippi Power's ECM clause.
At December 31, 2018 and 2017, substantially all of Mississippi Power's energy-related derivative contracts were designated as regulatory hedges and were related to retail salesMississippi Power's fuel-hedging program. Therefore, gains and losses are accrued at the end of each fiscal period. Electric rates for the Company include provisions to adjust billings for fluctuationsinitially recorded as regulatory liabilities and assets, respectively, and then are included in fuel costs, the energy component of purchased power costs, and certain other costs. Revenues are adjusted for differences between the actual recoverable costs and amounts billed in current regulated rates.
The Company has a diversified base of customers. No single customer or industry comprises 10% or more of revenues. For all periods presented, uncollectible accounts averaged less than 1% of revenues.
Fuel Costs
Fuel costs are expensed as the fuel is used. Fuel expense generally includes fuel transportation costs and the cost of purchased emissions allowances as they are used. Fuel expense also includesrecovered through the amortization of the cost of nuclear fuel.
Income and Other Taxes
The Company uses the liability method of accounting for deferred income taxes and provides deferred income taxes for all significant income tax temporary differences. Taxes that are collected from customers on behalf of governmental agencies to be remitted to these agencies are presented net on the statements of income.
Federal ITCs utilized are deferred and, upon utilization, amortized to income as a credit to reduce depreciation over the average life of the related property. The Company had $87 million in federal ITCs at December 31, 2017 that will expire by 2037. State ITCs are recognized in the period in which the credits are generated. The Company had state investment and other tax credit carryforwards totaling $495 million at December 31, 2017, which will expire between 2019 and 2028 and are expected to be fully utilized by 2026.
The Company recognizes tax positions that are "more likely than not" of being sustained upon examination by the appropriate taxing authorities. See Note 5 under "Unrecognized Tax Benefits" for additional information.
Property, Plant, and Equipment
Property, plant, and equipment is stated at original cost less any regulatory disallowances and impairments. Original cost includes: materials; labor; minor items of property; appropriate administrative and general costs; payroll-related costs such as taxes, pensions, and other benefits; and the cost of equity and debt funds used during construction.
The Company's property, plant, and equipment in service consisted of the following at December 31:
 2017 2016
 (in millions)
Generation$17,038
 $16,668
Transmission5,947
 5,779
Distribution9,978
 9,553
General1,870
 1,813
Plant acquisition adjustment28
 28
Total plant in service$34,861
 $33,841
The cost of replacements of property, exclusive of minor items of property, is capitalized. The cost of maintenance, repairs, and replacement of minor items of property is charged to other operations and maintenance expenses as incurred or performed with the exception of certain generating plant maintenance costs. As mandated by the Georgia PSC, the Company defers and amortizes nuclear refueling outage costs over the unit's operating cycle. The refueling cycles are 18 and 24 months for Plant Vogtle Units 1 and 2 and Plant Hatch Units 1 and 2, respectively.
Depreciation and Amortization
Depreciation of the original cost of utility plant in service is provided primarily by using composite straight-line rates, which approximated 2.7% in 2017, 2.8% in 2016, and 2.7% in 2015. Depreciation studies are conducted periodically to update the composite rates that are approved by the Georgia PSC and the FERC. When property subject to depreciation is retired or otherwise disposed of in the normal course of business, its original cost, together with the cost of removal, less salvage, is charged to accumulated depreciation. For other property dispositions, the applicable cost and accumulated depreciation are removed fromECM clause.
    Table of Contents                                Index to Financial Statements

NOTESMANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS (continued)
GeorgiaMississippi Power Company 20172018 Annual Report

Mississippi Power uses over-the-counter contracts that are not exchange traded but are fair valued using prices which are market observable, and thus fall into Level 2 of the balance sheet accounts,fair value hierarchy. See Note 13 to the financial statements for further discussion of fair value measurements. The maturities of the energy-related derivative contracts, which are all Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy, at December 31, 2018 were as follows:
 
Fair Value Measurements
December 31, 2018
 Total Maturity
 Fair Value Year 1 Years 2&3 
 (in millions)
Level 1$
 $
 $
Level 2(6) (2) (4)
Level 3
 
 
Fair value of contracts outstanding at end of period$(6) $(2) $(4)
Mississippi Power is exposed to market price risk in the event of nonperformance by counterparties to the energy-related derivative contracts. Mississippi Power only enters into agreements and a gainmaterial transactions with counterparties that have investment grade credit ratings by Moody's and S&P or losswith counterparties who have posted collateral to cover potential credit exposure. Therefore, Mississippi Power does not anticipate market risk exposure from nonperformance by the counterparties. For additional information, see Note 1 to the financial statements under "Financial Instruments" and Note 14 to the financial statements.
Capital Requirements and Contractual Obligations
The construction program of Mississippi Power is recognized. Minor items of propertycurrently estimated to total $222 million for 2019, $230 million for 2020, $216 million for 2021, $220 million for 2022, and $184 million for 2023. The construction program includes capital expenditures covered under LTSAs. Estimated capital expenditures to comply with environmental laws and regulations included in these amounts are $18 million, $20 million, $17 million, $5 million, and $13 million for 2019, 2020, 2021, 2022, and 2023, respectively. These estimated expenditures do not include any potential compliance costs associated with pending regulation of CO2 emissions from fossil fuel-fired electric generating units. See FUTURE EARNINGS POTENTIAL – "Environmental Matters – Environmental Laws and Regulations" and "– Global Climate Issues" herein for additional information.
Mississippi Power also anticipates costs associated with closure and monitoring of ash ponds in accordance with the originalCCR Rule, which are reflected in Mississippi Power's ARO liabilities. These costs, which are expected to change and could change materially as underlying assumptions are refined and the cost and the method and timing of the plantcompliance activities continue to be evaluated, are retired when the related property unit is retired.
Under the terms of the 2013 ARP, the Company amortized approximatelycurrently estimated to be $9 million, $9 million, $12 million, $14 million, annuallyand $15 million for the years 2019, 2020, 2021, 2022, and 2023, respectively. See FUTURE EARNINGS POTENTIAL – "Environmental Matters – Environmental Laws and Regulations – Coal Combustion Residuals" herein and Note 6 to the financial statements for additional information.
The construction program is subject to periodic review and revision, and actual construction costs may vary from 2014 through 2016these estimates because of its remainingnumerous factors. These factors include: changes in business conditions; changes in load projections; storm impacts; changes in environmental laws and regulations; the outcome of any legal challenges to environmental rules; changes in generating plants, including unit retirements and replacements and adding or changing fuel sources at existing electric generating units, to meet regulatory liability related to other cost of removal obligations.
Asset Retirement Obligationsrequirements; changes in FERC rules and Other Costs of Removal
AROs are computed as the present value of the estimated ultimate costs for an asset's future retirement and are recordedregulations; Mississippi PSC approvals; changes in the periodexpected environmental compliance program; changes in whichlegislation; the liability is incurred. The costs are capitalized as partcost and efficiency of the related long-lived assetconstruction labor, equipment, and depreciated over the asset's useful life. In the absence of quoted market prices, AROs are estimated using present value techniques in which estimates of future cash outlays associated with the asset retirements are discounted using a credit-adjusted risk-free rate. Estimates of the timingmaterials; project scope and amounts of future cash outlays are based on projections of when and how the assets will be retireddesign changes; and the cost of future removal activities. The Company has received accounting guidance from the Georgia PSC allowing the continued accrual and recovery of other retirementcapital. In addition, there can be no assurance that costs for long-lived assets that the Company does not have a legal obligationrelated to retire. Accordingly, amounts tocapital expenditures will be recovered are reflectedfully recovered.
In addition, as discussed in the balance sheets as a regulatory asset and any accumulated removal costs for future obligations are reflected in the balance sheets as a regulatory liability.
The ARO liability primarily relatesNote 11 to the Company's ash ponds, landfills,financial statements, Mississippi Power provides postretirement benefits to substantially all employees and gypsum cells that are subjectfunds trusts to the Disposal of Coal Combustion Residuals from Electric Utilities final rule publishedextent required by the EPA in 2015 (CCR Rule). In addition, the Company has retirement obligationsFERC.
Funding requirements related to decommissioning of the Company's nuclear facilities, which include the Company's ownership interests in Plant Hatch and Plant Vogtle Units 1 and 2, underground storage tanks, and asbestos removal. The Company also has identified retirement obligations related to certain transmission and distribution facilities, including the disposal of polychlorinated biphenyls in certain transformers; leasehold improvements; equipment on customer property; and property associated with the Company's rail lines and natural gas pipelines. However, liabilities for the removalscheduled maturities of these assets have not been recorded because the settlement timing for the retirement obligations related to these assets is indeterminable and, therefore, the fair value of the retirement obligations cannot be reasonably estimated. A liability for these AROs will be recognized when sufficient information becomes available to support a reasonable estimation of the ARO. The Company will continue to recognize in the statements of income allowed removal costs in accordance with its regulatory treatment. Any differences between costs recognized in accordance with accounting standards related to asset retirement and environmental obligations and those reflected in rates are recognized as either a regulatory asset or liability in the balance sheets as ordered by the Georgia PSC. See "Nuclear Decommissioning" herein for additional information on amounts included in rates.
Details of the AROs included in the balance sheets are as follows:
 2017 2016
 (in millions)
Balance at beginning of year$2,532
 $1,916
Liabilities incurred4
 
Liabilities settled(120) (123)
Accretion89
 77
Cash flow revisions133
 662
Balance at end of year$2,638
 $2,532
In 2017 and 2016, the increases in cash flow revisions are primarily related to changes to the Company's closure strategy for ash ponds, landfills, and gypsum cells and the increases in liabilities settled are primarily related to ash pond closure activity.
The cost estimates for AROs related to the CCR Rule are based on information as of December 31, 2017 using various assumptions related to closure and post-closure costs, timing of future cash outlays, inflation and discount rates, and the potential methods for complying with the CCR Rule requirements for closure. As further analysis is performed and closure details are developed, the Company will continue to periodically update these cost estimates as necessary.
Nuclear Decommissioning
The NRC requires licensees of commercial nuclear power reactors to establish a plan for providing reasonable assurance of funds for future decommissioning. The Company has external trust funds (Funds) to comply with the NRC's regulations. Use of the Funds is restricted to nuclear decommissioning activities. The Funds are managed and invested in accordance with applicable requirements of various regulatory bodies, including the NRC, the FERC, and the Georgia PSC,long-term debt, as well as the IRS. Whilerelated interest, derivative obligations, pension and other post-retirement benefit plans, leases, other purchase commitments, and ARO settlements are detailed in the Company is allowed to prescribe an overall investment policycontractual obligations table that follows. See Notes 1, 6, 8, 9, 11, and 14 to the Funds' managers, the Company and its affiliates are notfinancial statements for additional information.
    Table of Contents                                Index to Financial Statements

NOTESMANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS (continued)
GeorgiaMississippi Power Company 20172018 Annual Report

allowed to engage in the day-to-day management of the Funds or to mandate individual investment decisions. Day-to-day management of the investments in the Funds is delegated to unrelated third party managers with oversight by the management of the Company. The Funds' managers are authorized, within certain investment guidelines, to actively buy and sell securities at their own discretion in order to maximize the return on the Funds' investments. The Funds are invested in a tax-efficient manner in a diversified mix of equity and fixed income securities and are reported as trading securities.Contractual Obligations
The Company records the investment securities held in the Funds at fair value, as disclosed in Note 10, as management believes that fair value best represents the nature of the Funds. Gains and losses, whether realized or unrealized, are recorded in the regulatory liability for AROs in the balance sheets and are not included in net income or OCI. Fair value adjustments and realized gains and losses are determined on a specific identification basis.
The Funds participate in a securities lending program through the managers of the Funds. Under this program, the Funds' investment securities are loaned to institutional investors for a fee. Securities loaned are fully collateralized by cash, letters of credit, and/or securities issued or guaranteed by the U.S. government or its agencies or instrumentalities. As of December 31, 2017 and 2016, approximately $76 million and $56 million, respectively, of the fair market value of the Funds' securities were on loan and pledged to creditors under the Funds' managers' securities lending program. The fair value of the collateral received was approximately $77 million and $58 millionContractual obligations at December 31, 2017 and 2016, respectively, and can only be sold by the borrower upon the return of the loaned securities. The collateral received is treated2018 were as a non-cash item in the statements of cash flows.follows:
At December 31, 2017, investment securities in the Funds totaled $929 million, consisting of equity securities of $415 million, debt securities of $502 million, and $12 million of other securities. At December 31, 2016, investment securities in the Funds totaled $814 million, consisting of equity securities of $326 million, debt securities of $477 million, and $11 million of other securities. These amounts include the investment securities pledged to creditors and collateral received, and exclude receivables related to investment income and pending investment sales and payables related to pending investment purchases and the securities lending program.
Sales of the securities held in the Funds resulted in cash proceeds of $568 million, $803 million, and $980 million in 2017, 2016, and 2015, respectively, all of which were reinvested. For 2017, fair value increases, including reinvested interest and dividends and excluding the Funds' expenses, were $108 million, which included $83 million related to unrealized gains on securities held in the Funds at December 31, 2017. For 2016, fair value increases, including reinvested interest and dividends and excluding the Funds' expenses, were $38 million, which included $14 million related to unrealized losses on securities held in the Funds at December 31, 2016. For 2015, fair value increases, including reinvested interest and dividends and excluding the Funds' expenses, were $3 million, which included $26 million related to unrealized gains and losses on securities held in the Funds at December 31, 2015. While the investment securities held in the Funds are reported as trading securities, the Funds continue to be managed with a long-term focus. Accordingly, all purchases and sales within the Funds are presented separately in the statements of cash flows as investing cash flows, consistent with the nature of the securities and purpose for which the securities were acquired.
 2019 
2020-
2021
 
2022-
2023
 
After
2023
 Total
 (in millions)
Long-term debt(a) —
         
Principal$
 $577
 $
 $983
 $1,560
Interest70
 130
 80
 577
 857
Financial derivative obligations(b)
3
 5
 
 
 8
Operating leases(c)
3
 3
 2
 2
 10
Purchase commitments —         
Capital(d)
222
 410
 352
 
 984
Fuel(e)
378
 368
 199
 136
 1,081
Long-term service agreements(f)
27
 57
 70
 250
 404
Purchased power(g)
11
 35
 36
 435
 517
ARO settlements(h)
9
 21
 29
 
 59
Pension and other postretirement benefits plans(i)
8
 15
 
 
 23
Total$731
 $1,621
 $768
 $2,383
 $5,503
The NRC's minimum external funding requirements are based on a generic estimate of the cost to decommission only the radioactive portions of a nuclear unit based on the size and type of reactor. The Company has filed plans with the NRC designed to ensure that, over time, the deposits and earnings of the Funds will provide the minimum funding amounts prescribed by the NRC.
(a)
All amounts are reflected based on final maturity dates. Mississippi Power plans to continue, when economically feasible, to retire higher-cost securities and replace these obligations with lower-cost capital if market conditions permit. Variable rate interest obligations are estimated based on rates at December 31, 2018, as reflected in the statements of capitalization. Fixed rates include, where applicable, the effects of interest rate derivatives employed to manage interest rate risk. For additional information, see Note 8 to the financial statements.
(b)
Derivative obligations are for energy-related derivatives. For additional information, see Notes 1 and 14 to the financial statements.
(c)See Note 9 to the financial statements for additional information.
(d)
Mississippi Power provides estimated capital expenditures for a five-year period, including capital expenditures associated with environmental regulations. At December 31, 2018, significant purchase commitments were outstanding in connection with the construction program. These amounts exclude capital expenditures covered under LTSAs and estimated capital expenditures for AROs, which are reflected separately. See FUTURE EARNINGS POTENTIAL – "Environmental Matters" for additional information.
(e)Includes commitments to purchase coal and natural gas, as well as the related transportation and storage. In most cases, these contracts contain provisions for price escalation, minimum purchase levels, and other financial commitments. Natural gas purchase commitments are based on various indices at the time of delivery. Amounts reflected for natural gas purchase commitments have been estimated based on the NYMEX future prices at December 31, 2018.
(f)LTSAs include price escalation based on inflation indices.
(g)
Estimated minimum long-term commitments for the purchase of solar energy. Energy costs associated with solar PPAs are recovered through the fuel clause. See Notes 2 and 9 to the financial statements for additional information.
(h)
Represents estimated costs for a five-year period associated with closing and monitoring ash ponds in accordance with the CCR Rule, which are reflected in Mississippi Power's ARO liabilities. Material expenditures in future years for ARO settlements also will be required for ash ponds and other liabilities reflected in Mississippi Power's AROs. See FUTURE EARNINGS POTENTIAL – "Environmental MattersEnvironmental Laws and RegulationsCoal Combustion Residuals" herein and Note 6 to the financial statements for additional information.
(i)Mississippi Power forecasts contributions to the pension and other postretirement benefit plans over a three-year period. Mississippi Power anticipates no mandatory contributions to the qualified pension plan during the next three years. Amounts presented represent estimated benefit payments for the nonqualified pension plans, estimated non-trust benefit payments for the other postretirement benefit plans, and estimated contributions to the other postretirement benefit plan trusts, all of which will be made from Mississippi Power's corporate assets. See Note 11 to the financial statements for additional information related to the pension and other postretirement benefit plans, including estimated benefit payments. Certain benefit payments will be made through the related benefit plans. Other benefit payments will be made from Mississippi Power's corporate assets.
    Table of Contents                                Index to Financial Statements

NOTES (continued)MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
GeorgiaSouthern Power Company 2017and Subsidiary Companies 2018 Annual Report

Site study cost is the estimate to decommission a specific facility as of the site study year. The decommissioning cost estimates are based on prompt dismantlement
OVERVIEW
Business Activities
Southern Power develops, constructs, acquires, owns, and removal of the plant from service. The actual decommissioning costs may vary from these estimates because of changesmanages power generation assets, including renewable energy projects, and sells electricity at market-based rates in the assumed datewholesale market. Southern Power continually seeks opportunities to execute its strategy to create value through various transactions including acquisitions, dispositions, and sales of decommissioning, changes in NRC requirements, or changes in the assumptions used in making these estimates. The estimated costs of decommissioning are based on the most current study performed in 2015. The site study costspartnership interests, development and external trust funds for decommissioning as of December 31, 2017 based on the Company's ownership interests were as follows:
 Plant Hatch 
Plant Vogtle
Units 1 and 2
Decommissioning periods:   
Beginning year2034
 2047
Completion year2075
 2079
 (in millions)
Site study costs: 
Radiated structures$678
 $568
Spent fuel management160
 147
Non-radiated structures64
 89
Total site study costs$902
 $804
External trust funds$583
 $346
For ratemaking purposes, the Company's decommissioning costs are based on the NRC generic estimate to decommission the radioactive portion of the facilities and the site study estimate for spent fuel management as of 2012. Under the 2013 ARP, the Georgia PSC approved annual decommissioning cost for ratemaking of $4 million and $2 million for Plant Hatch and Plant Vogtle Units 1 and 2, respectively. Significant assumptions used to determine the costs for ratemaking include an estimated inflation rate of 2.4% and an estimated trust earnings rate of 4.4%. The Company expects the Georgia PSC to review and adjust, if necessary, the amounts collected in rates for nuclear decommissioning costs in the Company's 2019 base rate case.
Allowance for Funds Used During Construction
The Company records AFUDC, which represents the estimated debt and equity costs of capital funds that are necessary to finance the construction of new regulatedgenerating facilities, and entry into PPAs primarily with investor-owned utilities, IPPs, municipalities, electric cooperatives, and other load-serving entities, as well as commercial and industrial customers. In general, Southern Power commits to the construction or acquisition of new generating capacity only after entering into or assuming long-term PPAs for the new facilities. While cash is not realized currently, AFUDC increases
During 2018, Southern Power acquired and placed in service the revenue requirement20-MW Gaskell West 1 solar facility, placed in service the 148-MW Cactus Flats wind facility, acquired and is recovered over the service lifebegan construction of the plant through a higher rate base100-MW Wild Horse Mountain and higher depreciation. The equity componentthe 200-MW Reading wind facilities, and continued construction of AFUDC is not included in calculating taxable income. For the years 2017, 2016,expansion of the 385-MW Mankato natural gas facility. See FUTURE EARNINGS POTENTIAL – "Acquisitions" and 2015, the average AFUDC rates were 5.6%, 6.9%, and 6.5%, respectively, and AFUDC capitalized was $63 million, $68 million, and $56 million, respectively. AFUDC, net of income taxes, as a percentage of net income after dividends on preferred and preference stock was 3.8%, 4.6%, and 3.9% for 2017, 2016, and 2015, respectively. See Note 3 under "Retail Regulatory Matters – Nuclear Construction""Construction Projects" herein for additional informationinformation.
Also during 2018, Southern Power completed the following sales of noncontrolling interests and sales of assets resulting in approximately $2.6 billion in proceeds:
On May 22, 2018, Southern Power sold a noncontrolling 33% equity interest in SP Solar, a limited partnership indirectly owning substantially all of Southern Power's solar facilities, for approximately $1.2 billion.
On December 4, 2018, Southern Power sold all of its equity interests in Plant Oleander and Plant Stanton Unit A (together, the Florida Plants) to NextEra Energy for $203 million.
On December 11, 2018, Southern Power sold a noncontrolling tax equity interest in SP Wind, a holding company owning a portfolio of eight operating wind facilities, for approximately $1.2 billion.
In addition, on November 5, 2018, Southern Power entered into an agreement to sell all of its equity interests in Plant Mankato (including the inclusion385-MW expansion currently under construction) for an aggregate purchase price of construction costs related to Plant Vogtle Units 3 and 4 in rate base effective January 1, 2011.
Impairmentapproximately $650 million. The completion of Long-Lived Assets and Intangibles
The Company evaluates long-lived assets for impairment when events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying value of such assets may not be recoverable. The determination of whether an impairment has occurreddisposition is based on either a specific regulatory disallowance or an estimate of undiscounted future cash flows attributablesubject to the assets,expansion unit reaching commercial operation as comparedwell as various other customary conditions to closing, including FERC and state commission approvals, and the sale is expected to close mid-2019. The ultimate outcome of this matter cannot be determined at this time.
At December 31, 2018, Southern Power's generation fleet, which is owned in part with the carrying valueits various partners, totaled 11,888 MWs of the assets. If an impairment has occurred, the amountnameplate capacity in commercial operation (including 4,508 MWs of the impairment recognizednameplate capacity owned by its subsidiaries and including Plant Mankato, which is determined by either the amount of regulatory disallowance or by estimating the fair value of the assets and recording a loss if the carrying value is greater than the fair value. For assets identifiedclassified as held for sale in the carrying valuefinancial statements). The average remaining duration of Southern Power's total portfolio of wholesale contracts is compared toapproximately 14 years, which reduces remarketing risk for Southern Power. With the estimated fair value lessinclusion of the cost to sell in order to determine ifPPAs and investments associated with renewable and natural gas facilities currently under construction, Southern Power has an impairment loss is required. Until the assets are disposed of, their estimated fair value is re-evaluated when circumstances or events change.
Storm Damage Recovery
The Company defers and recovers certain costs related to damages from major storms as mandated by the Georgia PSC. Beginning January 1, 2014, the Company is accruing $30 million annually under the 2013 ARP that is recoverable through base rates. As ofaverage investment coverage ratio, at December 31, 20172018, of 93% through 2023 and December 31, 2016, the balance91% through 2028 (including Plant Mankato, which is classified as held for sale in the regulatory asset related to storm damage was $333 million and $206 million, respectively, with approximately $30 million included in other regulatory assets, current for both years and approximately $303 million and $176 million included in other regulatory assets, deferred, respectively. The annual recovery amount is expected tofinancial statements).
Southern Power's future earnings will be reviewed by the Georgia PSC and adjusted in future regulatory proceedings. Asmaterially decreased as a result of this

NOTES (continued)
Georgia Power Company 2017 Annual Report

regulatory treatment, costs related to storms are generally not expected to have a material impactthe asset and non-controlling interest sales described above. In addition, Southern Power's future earnings will depend on the Company's earnings.parameters of the wholesale market and the efficient operation of its wholesale generating assets, as well as Southern Power's ability to execute its growth strategy and to develop and construct generating facilities. In addition, Southern Power's future earnings may be impacted by the availability of federal and state solar ITCs and wind PTCs on its renewable energy projects, which could be impacted by future tax legislation. See Note 3 under "Retail Regulatory MattersFUTURE EARNINGS POTENTIALStorm Damage Recovery""General," "Acquisitions," "Construction Projects," and "Income Tax Matters" herein and Notes 10 and 15 to the financial statements for additional information.
Environmental Remediation Recovery
The Company maintains a reserve for environmental remediation as mandated by the Georgia PSC. In 2013, the Georgia PSC approved the 2013 ARPTo evaluate operating results and to ensure Southern Power's ability to meet its contractual commitments to customers, Southern Power continues to focus on several key performance indicators, including, the recovery of approximately $2 million annually through the environmental compliance cost recovery (ECCR) tariff. The Company recognizes a liability for environmental remediation costs only when it determines a loss is probablebut not limited to, peak season equivalent forced outage rate, contract availability, and reasonably estimable and reduces the reserve as expenditures are incurred. Any difference between the liabilities accrued and cost recovered through rates is deferred as a regulatory asset or liability. The annual recovery amount is expected to be reviewed by the Georgia PSC and adjusted in future regulatory proceedings. As a result of this regulatory treatment, environmental remediation liabilities generally are not expected to have a material impact on the Company's earnings. As of December 31, 2017, the balance of the environmental remediation liability was $22 million and is included in other current liabilities. As of December 31, 2017, the balance of under recovered environmental remediation costs was $49 million, with approximately $2 million included in other regulatory assets, current and approximately $47 million included as other regulatory assets, deferred. As of December 31, 2016, the balance of the environmental remediation liability was $17 million and is included in other current liabilities. As of December 31, 2016, the balance of under recovered environmental remediation costs was $35 million, with approximately $2 million included in other regulatory assets, current and approximately $33 million included as other regulatory assets, deferred. See Note 3 under "Environmental Matters – Environmental Remediation" for additional information.
Cash and Cash Equivalents
For purposes of the financial statements, temporary cash investments are considered cash equivalents. Temporary cash investments are securities with original maturities of 90 days or less.
Materials and Supplies
Generally, materials and supplies include the average cost of transmission, distribution, and generating plant materials. Materials are charged to inventory when purchased and then expensed or capitalized to plant, as appropriate, at weighted average cost when installed.
Fuel Inventory
Fuel inventory includes the average cost of coal, natural gas, and oil, as well as transportation and emissions allowances. Fuel is recorded to inventory when purchased and then expensed, at weighted average cost, as used and recovered by the Company through fuel cost recovery rates approved by the Georgia PSC. Emissions allowances granted by the EPA are included in inventory at zero cost.
Financial Instruments
The Company uses derivative financial instruments to limit exposure to fluctuations in interest rates, the prices of certain fuel purchases, and electricity purchases and sales. All derivative financial instruments are recognized as either assets or liabilities on the balance sheets (included in "Other") and are measured at fair value. See Note 10 for additional information regarding fair value. Substantially all of the Company's bulk energy purchases and sales contracts that meet the definition of a derivative are excluded from fair value accounting requirements because they qualify for the "normal" scope exception, and are accounted for under the accrual method. Derivative contracts that qualify as cash flow hedges of anticipated transactions or are recoverable through the Georgia PSC-approved fuel-hedging program result in the deferral of related gains and losses in OCI or regulatory assets and liabilities, respectively, until the hedged transactions occur. Any ineffectiveness arising from cash flow hedges is recognized currently in net income. Other derivative contracts that qualify as fair value hedges are marked to market through current period income and are recorded on a net basis in the statements of income. Cash flows from derivatives are classified on the statements of cash flows in the same category as the hedged item. See Note 11 for additional information regarding derivatives.
The Company offsets fair value amounts recognized for multiple derivative instruments executed with the same counterparty under netting arrangements. Additionally, the Company had no outstanding collateral repayment obligations or rights to reclaim collateral arising from derivative instruments recognized at December 31, 2017.
The Company is exposed to potential losses related to financial instruments in the event of counterparties' nonperformance. The Company has established controls to determine and monitor the creditworthiness of counterparties in order to mitigate the Company's exposure to counterparty credit risk.

NOTES (continued)
Georgia Power Company 2017 Annual Report

Comprehensive Income
The objective of comprehensive income is to report a measure of all changes in common stock equity of an enterprise that result from transactions and other economic events of the period other than transactions with owners. Comprehensive income consists of net income, changes in the fair value of qualifying cash flow hedges, and reclassifications for amounts included in net income.
See RESULTS OF OPERATIONS herein for information on Southern Power's financial performance.
2. RETIREMENT BENEFITSEarnings
The Company has a defined benefit, trusteed, pension plan covering substantially all employees. This qualified pension plan is fundedSouthern Power's 2018 net income was $187 million, an $884 million decrease from 2017, primarily attributable to $743 million of tax benefits recognized in accordance with requirements of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974, as amended (ERISA). No contributions to the qualified pension plan were made for the year ended December 31, 2017 and no mandatory contributions to the qualified pension plan are anticipated for the year ending December 31, 2018. The Company also provides certain defined benefit pension plans for a selected group of management and highly compensated employees. Benefits under these non-qualified pension plans are funded on a cash basis. In addition, the Company provides certain medical care and life insurance benefits for retired employees through other postretirement benefit plans. The Company funds its other postretirement trusts to the extent required by the Georgia PSC and the FERC. For the year ending December 31,$79 million in tax expense recognized in 2018, no other postretirement trust contributions are expected.
Actuarial Assumptions
The weighted average rates assumed in the actuarial calculations used to determine both the net periodic costs for the pension and other postretirement benefit plans for the following year and the benefit obligations as of the measurement date are presented below.
Assumptions used to determine net periodic costs:2017 2016 2015
Pension plans     
Discount rate – benefit obligations4.40% 4.65% 4.18%
Discount rate – interest costs3.72
 3.86
 4.18
Discount rate – service costs4.83
 5.03
 4.49
Expected long-term return on plan assets7.95
 8.20
 8.20
Annual salary increase4.46
 4.46
 3.59
Other postretirement benefit plans     
Discount rate – benefit obligations4.23% 4.49% 4.03%
Discount rate – interest costs3.55
 3.67
 4.03
Discount rate – service costs4.63
 4.88
 4.39
Expected long-term return on plan assets6.79
 6.27
 6.48
Annual salary increase4.46
 4.46
 3.59
Assumptions used to determine benefit obligations:2017
2016
Pension plans


Discount rate3.79%
4.40%
Annual salary increase4.46

4.46
Other postretirement benefit plans


Discount rate3.68%
4.23%
Annual salary increase4.46

4.46
The Company estimates the expected rate of return on pension plan and other postretirement benefit plan assets using a financial model to project the expected return on each current investment portfolio. The analysis projects an expected rate of return on each of eight different asset classes in order to arrive at the expected return on the entire portfolio relying on each trust's target asset allocation and reasonable capital market assumptions. The financial model is based on four key inputs: anticipated returns by asset class (based in part on historical returns), each trust's target asset allocation, an anticipated inflation rate, and the projected impact of a periodic rebalancing of each trust's portfolio.

NOTES (continued)
Georgia Power Company 2017 Annual Report

An additional assumption used in measuring the accumulated other postretirement benefit obligations (APBO) was a weighted average medical care cost trend rate. The weighted average medical care cost trend rates used in measuring the APBO as of December 31, 2017 were as follows:
 Initial Cost Trend Rate Ultimate Cost Trend Rate Year That Ultimate Rate is Reached
Pre-656.50% 4.50% 2026
Post-65 medical5.00
 4.50
 2026
Post-65 prescription10.00
 4.50
 2026
An annual increase or decrease in the assumed medical care cost trend rate of 1% would affect the APBO and the service and interest cost components at December 31, 2017 as follows:
 
1 Percent
Increase
 
1 Percent
Decrease
 (in millions)
Benefit obligation$59
 $50
Service and interest costs2
 2
Pension Plans
The total accumulated benefit obligation for the pension plans was $3.8 billion at December 31, 2017 and $3.5 billion at December 31, 2016. Changes in the projected benefit obligations and the fair value of plan assets during the plan years ended December 31, 2017 and 2016 were as follows:
 2017 2016
 (in millions)
Change in benefit obligation   
Benefit obligation at beginning of year$3,800
 $3,615
Service cost74
 70
Interest cost138
 136
Benefits paid(187) (164)
Actuarial (gain) loss363
 143
Balance at end of year4,188
 3,800
Change in plan assets   
Fair value of plan assets at beginning of year3,621
 3,196
Actual return (loss) on plan assets610
 288
Employer contributions14
 301
Benefits paid(187) (164)
Fair value of plan assets at end of year4,058
 3,621
Accrued liability$(130) $(179)
At December 31, 2017, the projected benefit obligations for the qualified and non-qualified pension plans were $4.0 billion and $153 million, respectively. All pension plan assets are related to the qualified pension plan.

NOTES (continued)
Georgia Power Company 2017 Annual Report

Amounts recognized in the balance sheets at December 31, 2017 and 2016 relatedTax Reform Legislation. Also contributing to the Company's pension plans consist of the following:
 2017 2016
 (in millions)
Prepaid pension costs$23
 $
Other regulatory assets, deferred1,105
 1,129
Other current liabilities(15) (14)
Employee benefit obligations(138) (165)
Presented below are the amounts includeddecrease were asset impairment charges in regulatory assets at December 31, 2017 and 2016 related to the defined benefit pension plans that had not yet been recognized in net periodic pension cost along with the estimated amortization of such amounts2018 totaling $156 million ($120 million pre-tax for 2018.
 2017 2016 
Estimated
Amortization
in 2018
 (in millions)
Prior service cost$14
 $17
 $2
Net (gain) loss1,091
 1,112
 69
Regulatory assets$1,105
 $1,129
  
The changes in the balance of regulatory assets related to the defined benefit pension plans for the years ended December 31, 2017 and 2016 are presented in the following table:
 2017 2016
 (in millions)
Regulatory assets:   
Beginning balance$1,129
 $1,076
Net (gain) loss36
 99
Change in prior service costs
 14
Reclassification adjustments:   
Amortization of prior service costs(3) (5)
Amortization of net gain (loss)(57) (55)
Total reclassification adjustments(60) (60)
Total change(24) 53
Ending balance$1,105
 $1,129
Components of net periodic pension cost were as follows:
 2017 2016 2015
 (in millions)
Service cost$74
 $70
 $73
Interest cost138
 136
 154
Expected return on plan assets(283) (258) (251)
Recognized net (gain) loss57
 55
 76
Net amortization3
 5
 9
Net periodic pension cost$(11) $8
 $61
Net periodic pension cost is the sum of service cost, interest cost, and other costs netted against the expected return on plan assets. The expected return on plan assets is determined by multiplying the expected rate of return on plan assets and the market-related value of plan assets. In determining the market-related value of plan assets, the Company has elected to amortize changes in the
    Table of Contents                                Index to Financial Statements

NOTESMANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS (continued)
GeorgiaSouthern Power Company 2017and Subsidiary Companies 2018 Annual Report

market valueFlorida Plants and $36 million pre-tax for turbine equipment held for development projects, which together totaled $117 million after tax), partially offset by approximately $65 million in state income tax benefits arising from reorganizations of all plan assets over five years rather than recognizelegal entities that own and operate certain of Southern Power's solar and wind facilities.
Southern Power's 2017 net income was $1.1 billion, a $733 million increase from 2016, primarily attributable to $743 million in tax benefits recognized in 2017 related to the changes immediately. As a result,Tax Reform Legislation. Also contributing to the accounting valuechange were increases in operating expenses and interest expense related to Southern Power's growth strategy and continuous construction program, largely offset by increased renewable energy sales.
In addition, tax benefits from wind PTCs significantly impacted Southern Power's net income in 2018 and 2017. Tax benefits from solar ITCs related to the acquisition and construction of plan assets that is usednew facilities also significantly impacted Southern Power's net income in 2017 and 2016. See Note 10 to calculate the expected return on plan assets differs from the current fair valuefinancial statements under "Effective Tax Rate" for additional information.
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
A condensed statement of the plan assets.
Future benefit payments reflect expected future service and are estimated based on assumptions used to measure the projected benefit obligation for the pension plans. At December 31, 2017, estimated benefit payments were asincome follows:
 
Benefit
Payments
 (in millions)
2018$196
2019201
2020207
2021210
2022216
2023 to 20271,156
 Amount 
Increase (Decrease)
from Prior Year
 2018 2018 2017
 (in millions)
Operating revenues$2,205
 $130
 $498
Fuel699
 78
 165
Purchased power176
 27
 47
Other operations and maintenance395
 9
 32
Depreciation and amortization493
 (10) 151
Taxes other than income taxes46
 (2) 25
Asset impairment156
 156
 
Gain on disposition(2) (2) 
Total operating expenses1,963
 256
 420
Operating income242
 (126) 78
Interest expense, net of amounts capitalized183
 (8) 74
Other income (expense), net23
 22
 (5)
Income taxes (benefit)(164) 775
 (744)
Net income246
 (871) 743
Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests59
 13
 10
Net income attributable to Southern Power$187
 $(884) $733
Other Postretirement BenefitsOperating Revenues
Changes inTotal operating revenues include PPA capacity revenues, which are derived primarily from long-term contracts involving natural gas and biomass generating facilities, and PPA energy revenues from Southern Power's generation facilities. To the APBO and in the fair value of plan assets during the plan years ended December 31, 2017 and 2016 were as follows:
 2017 2016
 (in millions)
Change in benefit obligation   
Benefit obligation at beginning of year$847
 $854
Service cost7
 6
Interest cost29
 30
Benefits paid(51) (45)
Actuarial (gain) loss28
 (1)
Retiree drug subsidy3
 3
Balance at end of year863
 847
Change in plan assets   
Fair value of plan assets at beginning of year354
 358
Actual return (loss) on plan assets54
 21
Employer contributions26
 17
Benefits paid(48) (42)
Fair value of plan assets at end of year386
 354
Accrued liability$(477) $(493)
Amounts recognized in the balance sheets at December 31, 2017 and 2016 relatedextent Southern Power has capacity not contracted under a PPA, it may sell power into an accessible wholesale market, or, to the Company's other postretirement benefit plans consistextent those generation assets are part of the following:FERC-approved IIC, it may sell power into the power pool.
Natural Gas and Biomass Capacity and Energy Revenue
 2017 2016
 (in millions)
Other regulatory assets, deferred$202
 $213
Employee benefit obligations(477) (493)
Capacity revenues generally represent the greatest contribution to operating income and are designed to provide recovery of fixed costs plus a return on investment.
Energy is generally sold at variable cost or is indexed to published natural gas indices. Energy revenues will vary depending on the energy demand of Southern Power's customers and their generation capacity, as well as the market prices of wholesale energy compared to the cost of Southern Power's energy. Energy revenues also include fees for support services, fuel storage, and unit start charges. Increases and decreases in energy revenues under PPAs that are driven by fuel or purchased power prices are accompanied by an increase or decrease in fuel and purchased power costs and do not have a significant impact on net income.
    Table of Contents                                Index to Financial Statements

NOTESMANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS (continued)
GeorgiaSouthern Power Company 2017and Subsidiary Companies 2018 Annual Report

Presented belowSolar and Wind Energy Revenue
Southern Power's energy sales from solar and wind generating facilities are predominantly through long-term PPAs that do not have a capacity charge. Customers either purchase the amounts included in regulatory assets at December 31, 2017 and 2016energy output of a dedicated renewable facility through an energy charge or pay a fixed price related to the other postretirement benefit plans that had not yet been recognized in net periodic other postretirement benefit cost along withenergy generated from the estimated amortization of such amounts for 2018.
 2017 2016 
Estimated
Amortization
in 2018
 (in millions)
Prior service cost$5
 $6
 $1
Net (gain) loss197
 207
 9
Regulatory assets$202
 $213
  
The changes in the balance of regulatory assets relatedrespective facility and sold to the grid. As a result, Southern Power's ability to recover fixed and variable operations and maintenance expenses is dependent upon the level of energy generated from these facilities, which can be impacted by weather conditions, equipment performance, transmission constraints, and other postretirement benefit plansfactors.
See FUTURE EARNINGS POTENTIAL – "Power Sales Agreements" herein for the plan years ended December 31, 2017 and 2016 are presented in the following table:additional information regarding Southern Power's PPAs.
 2017 2016
 (in millions)
Regulatory assets:   
Beginning balance$213
 $223
Net (gain) loss(2) 
Reclassification adjustments:   
Amortization of prior service costs(1) (1)
Amortization of net gain (loss)(8) (9)
Total reclassification adjustments(9) (10)
Total change(11) (10)
Ending balance$202
 $213
ComponentsDetails of the other postretirement benefit plans' net periodic costSouthern Power's operating revenues were as follows:
 2017 2016 2015
 (in millions)
Service cost$7
 $6
 $7
Interest cost29
 30
 34
Expected return on plan assets(25) (22) (24)
Net amortization9
 10
 11
Net periodic postretirement benefit cost$20
 $24
 $28
 2018 2017 2016
   (in millions)  
PPA capacity revenues$580
 $599
 $541
PPA energy revenues1,140
 970
 694
Total PPA revenues1,720
 1,569
 1,235
Non-PPA revenues472
 494
 330
Other revenues13
 12
 12
Total operating revenues$2,205
 $2,075
 $1,577
Future benefit payments, including prescription drug benefits, reflect expected future serviceOperating revenues for 2018 were $2.2 billion, reflecting a $130 million, or 6%, increase from 2017. The increase in operating revenues was primarily due to the following:
PPA capacity revenuesdecreased $19 million, or 3%, primarily due to decreases of $16 million from the contractual expiration of an affiliate natural gas PPA and $5 million from the Florida Plants sold in December 2018.
PPA energy revenues increased $170 million, or 18%, primarily due to a $142 million increase in sales related to existing natural gas facilities driven by an $88 million increase in the average cost of fuel and a $54 million increase in the volume of KWHs sold due to customer load, a $12 million increase related to PPAs associated with new renewable facilities, and a $16 million increase related to PPAs associated with existing renewable facilities primarily due to an increase in the volume of KWHs sold.
Non-PPA revenues decreased $22 million, or 4%, primarily due to a $56 million decrease in the volume of KWHs sold from uncovered natural gas capacity through short-term sales, partially offset by a $35 million increase in the market price of energy.
Operating revenues for 2017 were $2.1 billion, reflecting a $498 million, or 32%, increase from 2016. The increase in operating revenues was primarily due to the following:
PPA capacity revenuesincreased $58 million, or 11%, primarily due to additional customer capacity requirements and a new PPA related to Plant Mankato acquired in late 2016.
PPA energy revenues increased $276 million, or 40%, primarily due to a $213 million increase in renewable energy sales arising from new solar and wind facilities and a $50 million increase in sales related to existing natural gas PPAs primarily due to an $85 million increase in the average cost of fuel, partially offset by a $35 million decrease in the volume of KWHs sold primarily due to reduced customer load.
Non-PPA revenues increased $164 million, or 50%, primarily due to a $156 million increase in the volume of KWHs sold primarily from uncovered natural gas capacity through short-term opportunity sales, as well as an $8 million increase in the market price of energy.

MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS (continued)
Southern Power Company and Subsidiary Companies 2018 Annual Report

Fuel and Purchased Power Expenses
Details of Southern Power's generation and purchased power were as follows:
 Total
KWHs
Total KWH % ChangeTotal
KWHs
Total KWH % Change
 2018 2017 
 (in billions of KWHs)
Generation46 44 
Purchased power4 5 
Total generation and purchased power502%4923%
Total generation and purchased power, excluding solar, wind, and tolling agreements294%2822%
Southern Power's PPAs for natural gas and biomass generation generally provide that the purchasers are responsible for either procuring the fuel (tolling agreements) or reimbursing Southern Power for substantially all of the cost of fuel relating to the energy delivered under such PPAs. Consequently, changes in such fuel costs are generally accompanied by a corresponding change in related fuel revenues and do not have a significant impact on net income. Southern Power is responsible for the cost of fuel for generating units that are not covered under PPAs. Power from these generating units is sold into the wholesale market or into the power pool for capacity owned directly by Southern Power.
Purchased power expenses will vary depending on demand, availability, and the cost of generating resources throughout the Southern Company system and other contract resources. Load requirements are submitted to the power pool on an hourly basis and are estimated basedfulfilled with the lowest cost alternative, whether that is generation owned by Southern Power, an affiliate company, or external parties. Such purchased power costs are generally recovered through PPA revenues.
Details of Southern Power's fuel and purchased power expenses were as follows:
 2018 2017 2016
   (in millions)  
Fuel$699
 $621
 $456
Purchased power176
 149
 102
Total fuel and purchased power expenses$875
 $770
 $558
In 2018, total fuel and purchased power expenses increased $105 million, or 14%, compared to 2017. Fuel expenseincreased $78 million, or 13%, primarily due to a $60 million increase associated with the volume of KWHs generated, excluding solar, wind, and tolling agreements, primarily due to customer load, and an $18 million increase associated with the average cost of natural gas per KWH generated. Purchased power expense increased $27 million, or 18%, primarily due to a $43 million increase associated with the average cost of purchased power, primarily in the first quarter 2018, partially offset by a $16 million decrease associated with the volume of KWHs purchased.
In 2017, total fuel and purchased power expenses increased $212 million, or 38%, compared to 2016. Fuel expenseincreased $165 million, or 36%, primarily due to an $83 million increase associated with the volume of KWHs generated, excluding solar, wind, and tolling agreements, and an $82 million increase associated with the average cost of natural gas per KWH generated. Purchased power expense increased $47 million, or 46%, primarily due to a $37 million increase associated with the volume of KWHs purchased and an $11 million increase associated with the average cost of purchased power.
Other Operations and Maintenance Expenses
In 2018, other operations and maintenance expenses increased $9 million, or 2%, compared to 2017. The increase was primarily due to scheduled outage and maintenance expenses. In 2017, other operations and maintenance expenses increased $32 million, or 9%, compared to 2016. The increase was primarily due to increases of $56 million associated with new facilities, $21 million in business development and support expenses, and $6 million in employee compensation, all associated with Southern Power's overall growth. These 2017 increases were partially offset by decreases of $35 million associated with scheduled outage and maintenance expenses and $15 million in non-outage operations and maintenance expenses.

MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS (continued)
Southern Power Company and Subsidiary Companies 2018 Annual Report

Depreciation and Amortization
In 2018, depreciation and amortization decreased $10 million, or 2%, compared to 2017, primarily due to the cessation of depreciation on assumptions usedthe Florida Plants and Plant Mankato that were classified as held for sale in May and November 2018, respectively. In 2017, depreciation and amortization increased $151 million, or 43%, compared to measure2016, primarily due to additional depreciation related to new solar, wind, and natural gas facilities placed in service. See Note 5 to the APBOfinancial statements under "Depreciation and AmortizationSouthern Power" and Note 15 to the financial statements under "Southern Power" and "Assets Held for Sale" for additional information.
Taxes Other Than Income Taxes
In 2018, taxes other than income taxes decreased $2 million, or 4%, compared to 2017. In 2017, taxes other than income taxes were $48 million compared to $23 million in 2016, primarily due to additional property taxes on new facilities.
Asset Impairment
In 2018, asset impairment charges were $156 million. In the second quarter 2018, a $119 million asset impairment charge was recorded in contemplation of the sale of the Florida Plants. In addition, in the third quarter 2018, a $36 million asset impairment charge was recorded on wind turbine equipment held for development projects. There were no asset impairment charges recorded in 2017 or 2016. See Note 15 to the financial statements under "Southern Power – Sales of Natural Gas Plants" and " – Development Projects" for additional information.
Interest Expense, Net of Amounts Capitalized
In 2018, interest expense, net of amounts capitalized decreased $8 million, or 4%, compared to 2017. The decrease was primarily due to an increase in capitalized interest associated with construction projects. In 2017, interest expense, net of amounts capitalized increased $74 million, or 63%, compared to 2016. The increase was primarily due to an increase of $44 million in interest expense related to an increase in average outstanding long-term debt, primarily to fund Southern Power's growth strategy and continuous construction program, as well as a $30 million decrease in capitalized interest associated with completing construction of and placing in service solar facilities.
Other Income (Expense), Net
In 2018, other postretirementincome (expense), net increased $22 million compared to 2017 primarily due to a $14 million gain from a joint-development wind project, which is attributable to Southern Power's partner in the project and fully offset within noncontrolling interests. In 2017, other income (expense), net decreased $5 million compared to 2016.
Income Taxes (Benefit)
In 2018, income tax benefit plans. Estimatedwas $164 million compared to $939 million for 2017, a decrease of $775 million, primarily attributable to a $743 million tax benefit payments are reducedin 2017 and a $79 million tax expense in 2018, both related to the remeasurement of accumulated deferred income taxes in accordance with the Tax Reform Legislation. In addition, income tax benefits associated with solar ITCs decreased by drug subsidy receipts expected$58 million as a result of fewer solar facilities being placed in service in 2018 as compared to 2017. These decreases were partially offset by $65 million of income tax benefits related to certain changes in state apportionment rates arising from reorganizations of Southern Power's legal entities that own and operate certain of its solar and wind facilities and a decrease of $47 million of income tax expense as a result of lower pre-tax earnings and the Medicare Prescription Drug, Improvement,lower federal tax rate.
In 2017, income tax benefit was $939 million compared to $195 million for 2016 of which $743 million of the increase was related to the Tax Reform Legislation. The remaining increase in tax benefit was primarily due to an increase of $89 million in PTCs from wind generation in 2017 and Modernization Actother state income taxes, significantly offset by a decrease in tax benefits associated with lower ITCs from solar facilities placed in service.
See FUTURE EARNINGS POTENTIAL – "Income Tax MattersFederal Tax Reform Legislation" herein and Notes 1 and 10 to the financial statements under "Income and Other Taxes" and "Effective Tax Rate," respectively, for additional information.
Net Income Attributable to Noncontrolling Interests
In 2018, net income attributable to noncontrolling interests increased $13 million, or 28%, compared to 2017. The increase was primarily due to $20 million of 2003 as follows:
 
Benefit
Payments
 
Subsidy
Receipts
 Total
 (in millions)
2018$55
 $(3) $52
201955
 (3) 52
202056
 (3) 53
202157
 (4) 53
202258
 (4) 54
2023 to 2027288
 (21) 267
net income allocations due to the sale of a noncontrolling 33% equity interest in SP Solar and $14 million of other income allocations attributable to a joint-development wind project, partially offset by a reduction of $19 million due to HLBV income allocations between Southern Power and tax equity partners for partnerships entered into during 2018. In
    Table of Contents                                Index to Financial Statements

NOTESMANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS (continued)
GeorgiaSouthern Power Company 2017and Subsidiary Companies 2018 Annual Report

Benefit Plan Assets2017, noncontrolling interests increased $10 million, or 28%, compared to 2016 primarily due to additional net income allocations from new solar partnerships.
Pension plan
Effects of Inflation
Southern Power is party to long-term contracts reflecting market-based rates, including inflation expectations. Any adverse effect of inflation on Southern Power's results of operations has not been substantial in recent years.
FUTURE EARNINGS POTENTIAL
General
The results of operations for the past three years are not necessarily indicative of Southern Power's future earnings potential. Southern Power completed multiple sales of noncontrolling interests and assets in 2018 as described below. These sales will materially decrease future earnings and cash flows to Southern Power. See below for a summary of the 2018 disposition activity. The level of Southern Power's future earnings also depends on numerous factors that affect the opportunities, challenges, and risks of Southern Power's competitive wholesale business. These factors include: Southern Power's ability to achieve sales growth while containing costs; regulatory matters; creditworthiness of customers; total generating capacity available in Southern Power's market areas; the successful remarketing of capacity as current contracts expire; and Southern Power's ability to execute its growth strategy through the development or acquisition of renewable facilities and other postretirement benefit plan assets are managed and investedenergy projects.
On May 22, 2018, Southern Power completed the sale of a noncontrolling 33% equity interest in accordance withSP Solar, a limited partnership indirectly owning substantially all applicable requirements, including ERISA and the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended. The Company's investment policiesSouthern Power's solar facilities, to Global Atlantic Financial Group Limited (Global Atlantic) for both the pension plan and the other postretirement benefit plans cover a diversified mixan aggregate purchase price of assets, including equity and fixed income securities, real estate, and private equity. Derivative instruments are used primarilyapproximately $1.2 billion. Accordingly, Global Atlantic will receive 33% of all cash distributions paid by SP Solar. Southern Power continues to gain efficient exposure to the various asset classes and as hedging tools. The Company minimizes the risk of large losses primarily through diversification but also monitors and manages other aspects of risk.
The composition of the Company's pension plan and other postretirement benefit plan assets as of December 31, 2017 and 2016, along with the targeted mix of assets for each plan, is presented below:
 Target 2017 2016
Pension plan assets:     
Domestic equity26% 31% 29%
International equity25
 25
 22
Fixed income23
 24
 29
Special situations3
 1
 2
Real estate investments14
 13
 13
Private equity9
 6
 5
Total100% 100% 100%
Other postretirement benefit plan assets:     
Domestic equity36% 38% 35%
International equity24
 24
 24
Domestic fixed income33
 31
 35
Special situations1
 1
 1
Real estate investments4
 4
 4
Private equity2
 2
 1
Total100% 100% 100%
The investment strategy for plan assets related to the Company's qualified pension plan is to be broadly diversified across major asset classes. The asset allocation is established after consideration of various factors that affectconsolidate the assets and liabilities of SP Solar with Global Atlantic's share of partnership earnings included in net income attributable to noncontrolling interests in the pension planconsolidated statements of income, which was $20 million for the period from May 22, 2018 to December 31, 2018.
Southern Power completed the sale of all of its equity interests in the Florida Plants to NextEra Energy on December 4, 2018, for an aggregate purchase price of $203 million. Pre-tax net income for the Florida Plants was $49 million and $37 million for the period from January 1, 2018 to December 4, 2018 and for the year ended December 31, 2017, respectively.
On December 11, 2018, Southern Power completed the sale of a noncontrolling tax equity interest in SP Wind, which owns a portfolio of eight operating wind facilities, to three financial investors, for approximately $1.2 billion. The tax equity investors together will generally receive 40% of the cash distributions from available cash and will receive a 99% allocation of tax attributes, including but not limitedPTCs. Southern Power continues to historical and expected returns and interest rates, volatility, correlations of asset classes,consolidate the current level of assets and liabilities andof SP Wind with the assumed growthinvestors' shares of partnership earnings reflected in assets and liabilities. Because a significant portionnet income attributable to noncontrolling interests in the consolidated statements of income.
On November 5, 2018, Southern Power entered into an agreement with Northern States Power to sell all of its equity interests in Plant Mankato (including the 385-MW expansion currently under construction) for an aggregate purchase price of approximately $650 million. The completion of the liability of the pension plandisposition is long-term in nature, the assets are invested consistent with long-term investment expectations for return and risk. To manage the actual asset class exposures relativesubject to the target asset allocation, the Company employs a formal rebalancing program. As additional risk management, external investment managers and service providers are subject to written guidelines to ensure appropriate and prudent investment practices. Management believes the portfolio is well-diversified with no significant concentrations of risk.
Investment Strategies
Detailed below is a description of the investment strategies for each major asset category for the pension and other postretirement benefit plans disclosed above:
Domestic equity. A mix of large and small capitalization stocks with generally an equal distribution of value and growth attributes, managed both actively and through passive index approaches.
International equity. A mix of growth stocks and value stocks with both developed and emerging market exposure, managed both actively and through passive index approaches.
Fixed income. A mix of domestic and international bonds.
Trust-owned life insurance (TOLI). Investments of the Company's taxable trusts aimed at minimizing the impact of taxes on the portfolio.
Special situations. Investments in opportunistic strategies with the objective of diversifying and enhancing returns and exploiting short-term inefficienciesexpansion unit reaching commercial operation as well as investmentsvarious other customary conditions to closing, including working capital and timing adjustments. Pre-tax net income for Plant Mankato was immaterial for the years ended December 31, 2018 and 2017. This transaction is subject to FERC and state commission approvals and is expected to close mid-2019. The ultimate outcome of this matter cannot be determined at this time.
Demand for electricity is primarily driven by the pace of economic growth that may be affected by changes in promising new strategiesregional and global economic conditions, as well as renewable portfolio standards, which may impact future earnings. Other factors that could influence future earnings include weather, transmission constraints, cost of generation from units within the power pool, and operational limitations.
Power Sales Agreements
General
Southern Power has PPAs with some of Southern Company's traditional electric operating companies, other investor-owned utilities, IPPs, municipalities, and other load-serving entities, as well as commercial and industrial customers. The PPAs are expected to provide Southern Power with a longer-term nature.stable source of revenue during their respective terms.
Many of Southern Power's PPAs have provisions that require Southern Power or the counterparty to post collateral or an acceptable substitute guarantee in the event that S&P or Moody's downgrades the credit ratings of the respective company to an unacceptable credit rating or if the counterparty is not rated or fails to maintain a minimum coverage ratio.
    Table of Contents                                Index to Financial Statements

NOTESMANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS (continued)
GeorgiaSouthern Power Company 2017and Subsidiary Companies 2018 Annual Report

Real estate investments. Investments in traditional private market, equity-orientedOn January 29, 2019, Pacific Gas & Electric Company (PG&E) filed petitions to reorganize under Chapter 11 of the U.S. Bankruptcy Code. Southern Power, together with its noncontrolling partners, owns four solar facilities where PG&E is the energy off-taker for approximately 207 MWs of capacity under long-term PPAs. PG&E is also the transmission provider for these facilities and two of Southern Power's other solar facilities. Southern Power has evaluated the recoverability of its investments in real properties (indirectly through pooled funds or partnerships)these solar facilities under various scenarios, including selling the related energy into the competitive markets, and in publicly traded real estate securities.
Private equity. Investments in private partnerships that invest in private or public securities typically through privately-negotiated and/or structured transactions, including leveraged buyouts, venture capital, and distressed debt.
Benefit Plan Asset Fair Values
Followinghas concluded they are the fair value measurements for the pension plan and the other postretirement benefit plan assets as of not impaired. At December 31, 20172018, Southern Power had outstanding accounts receivables due from PG&E of $1 million related to the PPAs and 2016$36 million related to the transmission interconnections (of which $17 million is classified in other deferred charges and assets). The fair values presented are preparedSouthern Power does not expect a material impact to its financial statements if, as a result of the bankruptcy proceedings, PG&E does not perform in accordance with GAAP. For purposes of determining the fair valuePPAs or the terms of the pension planPPAs are renegotiated; however, the ultimate outcome of this matter cannot be determined at this time.
Southern Power is working to maintain and expand its share of the wholesale markets. Southern Power expects there to be new demand for capacity that will develop in the 2019-2021 timeframe. The amount of available demand and timing will vary across the wholesale markets. Southern Power calculates an investment coverage ratio for its generating assets, which includes those assets owned in part with its various partners, based on the ratio of investment under contract to total investment using the respective generation facilities' net book value (or expected in-service value for facilities under construction) as the investment amount. With the inclusion of investments associated with the wind and natural gas facilities currently under construction, as well as other postretirement benefit plan assetscapacity and energy contracts, Southern Power has an average investment coverage ratio of 93% through 2023 and 91% through 2028, with an average remaining contract duration of approximately 14 years (including Plant Mankato, which is classified as held for sale in the appropriate level designation, management relies on informationfinancial statements). See "Acquisitions" and "Construction Projects" herein for additional information.
Natural Gas and Biomass
Southern Power's electricity sales from natural gas and biomass generating units are primarily through long-term PPAs that consist of two types of agreements. The first type, referred to as a unit or block sale, is a customer purchase from a dedicated generating unit where all or a portion of the generation from that unit is reserved for that customer. Southern Power typically has the ability to serve the unit or block sale customer from an alternate resource. The second type, referred to as requirements service, provides that Southern Power serve the customer's capacity and energy requirements from a combination of the customer's own generating units and from Southern Power resources not dedicated to serve unit or block sales. Southern Power has rights to purchase power provided by the plan's trustee. This information is reviewed and evaluated by management with changes maderequirements customers' resources when economically viable.
As a general matter, substantially all of the PPAs provide that the purchasers are responsible for either procuring the fuel (tolling agreements) or reimbursing Southern Power for substantially all of the cost of fuel or purchased power relating to the trustee information as appropriate.energy delivered under such PPAs. To the extent a particular generating facility does not meet the operational requirements contemplated in the PPAs, Southern Power may be responsible for excess fuel costs. With respect to fuel transportation risk, most of Southern Power's PPAs provide that the counterparties are responsible for the availability of fuel transportation to the particular generating facility.
Valuation methodsCapacity charges that form part of the primary fair value measurements disclosed in the following tablesPPA payments are as follows:
Domesticdesigned to recover fixed and international equity.Investments in equity securities such as common stocks, American depositary receipts,variable operation and real estate investment trusts that trade on a public exchange are classified as Level 1 investments and are valued at the closing price in the active market. Equity investments with unpublished prices (i.e. pooled funds) are valued as Level 2, when the underlying holdings used to value the investment are comprised of Level 1 or Level 2 equity securities.
Fixed income.Investments in fixed income securities are generally classified as Level 2 investments and are valuedmaintenance costs based on prices reported in the market place. Additionally, the value of fixed income securities takes into considerationdollars-per-kilowatt year. In general, to reduce Southern Power's exposure to certain items such as broker quotes, spreads, yield curves, interest rates,operation and discount rates that applymaintenance costs, Southern Power has LTSAs. See Note 1 to the term of a specific instrument.
financial statements under "Long-Term Service Agreements" for additional information.
Solar and Wind
TOLI. Investments in TOLI policiesSouthern Power's electricity sales from solar and wind (renewables) generating facilities are classified as Level 2 investmentsalso made pursuant to long-term PPAs; however, these solar and are valued based on the underlying investments held in the policy's separate account. The underlying assets are equity and fixed income pooled funds that are comprised of Level 1 and Level 2 securities.
Real estate investments, private equity, and special situations investments.Investments in real estate, private equity, and special situations are generally classified as Net Asset Value as a Practical Expedient, since the underlying assets typicallywind PPAs do not have publicly available observable inputs.a capacity charge and customers either purchase the energy output of a dedicated renewable facility through an energy charge or provide Southern Power a certain fixed price for the electricity sold to the grid. As a result, Southern Power's ability to recover fixed and variable operations and maintenance expenses is dependent upon the level of energy generated from these facilities, which can be impacted by weather conditions, equipment performance, transmission constraints, and other factors. Generally, under the solar and wind generation PPAs, the purchasing party retains the right to keep or resell the renewable energy credits.
Environmental Matters
Southern Power's operations are regulated by state and federal environmental agencies through a variety of laws and regulations governing air, water, land, and protection of other natural resources. Southern Power maintains a comprehensive environmental compliance strategy to assess upcoming requirements and compliance costs associated with these environmental laws and regulations. The fund manager values the assets using various inputscosts, including capital expenditures and techniques depending on the nature of the underlying investments. Techniques may include purchase multiples for comparable transactions, comparable public company trading multiples, discounted cash flow analysis, prevailing market capitalization rates, recent sales of comparable investments,operations and independent third-party appraisals. The fair value of partnerships is determined by aggregating the value of the underlying assets less liabilities.
maintenance costs, required to comply with
    Table of Contents                                Index to Financial Statements

NOTESMANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS (continued)
GeorgiaSouthern Power Company 2017and Subsidiary Companies 2018 Annual Report

environmental laws and regulations may impact results of operations, cash flows, and financial condition. Compliance costs may result from the installation of additional environmental controls. The fair valuesultimate impact of pension plan assetsthe environmental laws and regulations discussed below will depend on various factors, such as state adoption and implementation of requirements, the availability and cost of any deployed control technology, fuel prices, and the outcome of pending and/or future legal challenges.
New or revised environmental laws and regulations could affect many areas of Southern Power's operations. Southern Power's PPAs generally contain provisions that permit charging the counterparty with some of the new costs incurred as a result of changes in environmental laws and regulations.
Since Southern Power's units are newer natural gas and renewable generating facilities, costs associated with environmental compliance for these facilities have been less significant than for similarly situated coal or older natural gas generating facilities. Environmental, natural resource, and land use concerns, including the applicability of air quality limitations, the potential presence of wetlands or threatened and endangered species, the availability of water withdrawal rights, uncertainties regarding aesthetic impacts such as increased light or noise, and concerns about potential adverse health impacts, can, however, increase the cost of siting and operating any type of future electric generating facility. The impact of such laws and regulations on Southern Power and subsequent recovery through PPA provisions cannot be determined at this time.
Environmental Laws and Regulations
Air Quality
In 2011, the EPA finalized the Cross-State Air Pollution Rule (CSAPR) to address impacts of SODecember 31, 20172 and NO2016X are presented below. These fair value measurements exclude cash, receivables related to investment income, pending investments sales,emissions from fossil fuel-fired electric generating plants. CSAPR establishes emissions trading programs and payables related to pending investment purchases.budgets for certain states and allocates emissions allowances for sources in those states. In 2016, the EPA published a final rule establishing more stringent ozone season NOX emissions budgets in Alabama and Texas. The EPA also removed North Carolina from this particular CSAPR program. Georgia's ozone season NOX emissions budget remained unchanged. Increases in either future fossil fuel-fired generation or the availability or cost of CSAPR allowances could have a negative financial impact on results of operations for Southern Power.
Water Quality
 Fair Value Measurements Using  
 Quoted Prices in Active Markets for Identical Assets Significant Other Observable Inputs Significant Unobservable Inputs Net Asset Value as a Practical Expedient  
As of December 31, 2017:(Level 1)��(Level 2) (Level 3) (NAV) Total
 (in millions)
Assets:         
Domestic equity(*)
$819
 $394
 $
 $
 $1,213
International equity(*)
529
 477
 
 
 1,006
Fixed income:         
U.S. Treasury, government, and agency bonds
 286
 
 
 286
Mortgage- and asset-backed securities
 3
 
 
 3
Corporate bonds
 409
 
 
 409
Pooled funds
 221
 
 
 221
Cash equivalents and other74
 4
 
 
 78
Real estate investments160
 
 
 404
 564
Special situations
 
 
 61
 61
Private equity
 
 
 228
 228
Total$1,582
 $1,794
 $
 $693
 $4,069
In 2014, the EPA finalized requirements under Section 316(b) of the Clean Water Act (CWA) to regulate cooling water intake structures (CWIS) to minimize their effects on fish and other aquatic life at existing power plants (e.g. coal, natural gas, oil, and nuclear generating plants) and manufacturing facilities. The regulation requires plant-specific studies to determine applicable CWIS changes to protect organisms that either get caught on the intake screens (impingement) or are drawn into the cooling system (entrainment). Southern Power is conducting these studies and currently anticipates such changes will be limited to minor additions of monitoring equipment at certain of its electric generating plants. However, the ultimate impact of this rule will depend on the outcome of these plant-specific studies, any additional protective measures required to be incorporated into each plant's National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit based on site-specific factors, and the outcome of any legal challenges.
(*)Level 1 securities consist of actively traded stocks while Level 2 securities consist of pooled funds.
In 2015, the EPA and the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (Corps) jointly published a final rule that revised the regulatory definition of waters of the United States (WOTUS) for all CWA programs. The rule significantly expanded the scope of federal jurisdiction over waterbodies (such as rivers, streams, canals, and wastewater treatment ponds), which could impact new generation projects. The EPA and the Corps are expected to publish a final rule in 2019 to replace the 2015 WOTUS definition. The impact of any changes to the 2015 WOTUS rule will depend on the content of this final rule and the outcome of any legal challenges.
Global Climate Issues
On December 20, 2018, the EPA published a proposed review of the Standards of Performance for Greenhouse Gas Emissions from New, Modified, and Reconstructed Stationary Sources: Electric Utility Generating Units final rule (2015 NSPS rule). The EPA's final 2015 NSPS rule set standards of performance for new, modified, and reconstructed electric utility generating units which included stationary combustion turbines and fossil-fired steam boilers. This proposal reduces the stringency of the 2015 NSPS rule by not basing the new and reconstructed fossil-fired steam boiler standards on partial carbon capture and sequestration. The impact of any changes to this rule will depend on the content of the final rule and the outcome of any legal challenges.
The EPA's GHG reporting rule requires annual reporting of GHG emissions expressed in terms of metric tons of CO2 equivalent emissions for a company's operational control of facilities. Based on ownership or financial control of facilities, Southern Power's 2017 GHG emissions were approximately 13 million metric tons of CO2 equivalent. The preliminary estimate of Southern Power's 2018 GHG emissions on the same basis is approximately 14 million metric tons of CO2 equivalent.
    Table of Contents                                Index to Financial Statements

NOTESMANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS (continued)
GeorgiaSouthern Power Company 2017and Subsidiary Companies 2018 Annual Report

 Fair Value Measurements Using  
 Quoted Prices in Active Markets for Identical Assets Significant Other Observable Inputs Significant Unobservable Inputs Net Asset Value as a Practical Expedient  
As of December 31, 2016:(Level 1) (Level 2) (Level 3) (NAV) Total
 (in millions)
Assets:         
Domestic equity(*)
$686
 $317
 $
 $
 $1,003
International equity(*)
420
 380
 
 
 800
Fixed income:         
U.S. Treasury, government, and agency bonds
 201
 
 
 201
Mortgage- and asset-backed securities
 4
 
 
 4
Corporate bonds
 338
 
 
 338
Pooled funds
 179
 
 
 179
Cash equivalents and other340
 1
 
 
 341
Real estate investments106
 
 
 394
 500
Special situations
 
 
 61
 61
Private equity
 
 
 188
 188
Total$1,552
 $1,420
 $
 $643
 $3,615
(*)Level 1 securities consist of actively traded stocks while Level 2 securities consist of pooled funds.
The fair values of other postretirement benefit plan assets as of December 31, 2017 and 2016 are presented below. These fair value measurements exclude cash, receivables related to investment income, pending investments sales, and payables related to pending investment purchases.
 Fair Value Measurements Using  
 Quoted Prices in Active Markets for Identical Assets Significant Other Observable Inputs Significant Unobservable Inputs Net Asset Value as a Practical Expedient  
As of December 31, 2017:(Level 1) (Level 2) (Level 3) (NAV) Total
 (in millions)
Assets:         
Domestic equity(*)
$53
 $11
 $
 $
 $64
International equity(*)
14
 46
 
 
 60
Fixed income:         
U.S. Treasury, government, and agency bonds
 6
 
 
 6
Corporate bonds
 11
 
 
 11
Pooled funds
 41
 
 
 41
Cash equivalents and other4
 
 
 
 4
Trust-owned life insurance
 173
 
 
 173
Real estate investments6
 
 
 11
 17
Special situations
 
 
 2
 2
Private equity
 
 
 6
 6
Total$77
 $288
 $
 $19
 $384
(*)Level 1 securities consist of actively traded stocks while Level 2 securities consist of pooled funds.

NOTES (continued)
Georgia Power Company 2017 Annual Report

 Fair Value Measurements Using  
 Quoted Prices in Active Markets for Identical Assets Significant Other Observable Inputs Significant Unobservable Inputs Net Asset Value as a Practical Expedient  
As of December 31, 2016:(Level 1) (Level 2) (Level 3) (NAV) Total
 (in millions)
Assets:         
Domestic equity(*)
$45
 $9
 $
 $
 $54
International equity(*)
11
 37
 
 
 48
Fixed income:         
U.S. Treasury, government, and agency  bonds
 5
 
 
 5
Corporate bonds
 9
 
 
 9
Pooled funds
 38
 
 
 38
Cash equivalents and other15
 
 
 
 15
Trust-owned life insurance
 162
 
 
 162
Real estate investments3
 
 
 11
 14
Special situations
 
 
 2
 2
Private equity
 
 
 5
 5
Total$74
 $260
 $
 $18
 $352
(*)Level 1 securities consist of actively traded stocks while Level 2 securities consist of pooled funds.
Employee Savings Plan
The Company also sponsors a 401(k) defined contribution plan covering substantially all employees. The Company matches a portion of the first 6% of employee base salary contributions. The maximum Company match is 5.1% of an employee's base salary. Total matching contributions made to the plan for 2017, 2016, and 2015 were $26 million, $27 million, and $26 million, respectively.
3. CONTINGENCIES AND REGULATORY MATTERS
General LitigationIncome Tax Matters
In 2011, plaintiffs filed a putative class action against the Company in the Superior Court of Fulton County, Georgia alleging that the Company's collection in rates of municipal franchise fees (all of which are remitted to municipalities) exceeded the amounts allowed in orders of the Georgia PSC and alleging certain state tort law claims. In November 2016, the Georgia Court of Appeals reversed the trial court's previous dismissal of the case and remanded the case to the trial court for further proceedings. The Company filed a petition for writ of certiorari with the Georgia Supreme Court, which was granted on August 28, 2017. A decision from the Georgia Supreme Court is expected in late 2018. The Company believes the plaintiffs' claims have no merit and intends to vigorously defend itself in this matter. The ultimate outcome of this matter cannot be determined at this time.
The Company is also subject to certain claims and legal actions arising in the ordinary course of business. In addition, the Company's business activities are subject to extensive governmental regulation related to public health and the environment, such as regulation of air emissions and water discharges. Litigation over environmental issues and claims of various types, including property damage, personal injury, common law nuisance, and citizen enforcement of environmental requirements such as standards for air, water, land, and protection of other natural resources, has occurred throughout the U.S. This litigation has included claims for damages alleged to have been caused by CO2 and other emissions, CCR, and alleged exposure to hazardous materials, and/or requests for injunctive relief in connection with such matters. The ultimate outcome of such pending or potential litigation against the Company cannot be predicted at this time; however, for current proceedings not specifically reported herein, management does not anticipate that the ultimate liabilities, if any, arising from such current proceedings would have a material effect on the Company's financial statements.

NOTES (continued)
Georgia Power Company 2017 Annual Report

Environmental Matters
Environmental Remediation
The Company must comply with environmental laws and regulations governing the handling and disposal of waste and releases of hazardous substances. Under these various laws and regulations, the Company may also incur substantial costs to clean up affected sites. See Note 1 under "Environmental Remediation Recovery" for additional information.
The Company recognizes a liability for environmental remediation costs only when it determines a loss is probable and reasonably estimable. The Company's environmental remediation liability as of December 31, 2017 and 2016 was $22 million and $17 million, respectively. The Company has been designated or identified as a potentially responsible party at sites governed by the Georgia Hazardous Site Response Act and/or by the federal Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act, and assessment and potential cleanup of such sites is expected.
The ultimate outcome of these matters cannot be determined at this time; however, as a result of the Company's regulatory treatment for environmental remediation expenses described in Note 1 under "Environmental Remediation Recovery," these matters are not expected to have a material impact on the Company's financial statements.
Nuclear Fuel Disposal Costs
Acting through the DOE and pursuant to the Nuclear Waste Policy Act of 1982, the U.S. government entered into contracts with the Company that require the DOE to dispose of spent nuclear fuel and high level radioactive waste generated at Plant Hatch and Plant Vogtle Units 1 and 2 beginning no later than January 31, 1998. The DOE has yet to commence the performance of its contractual and statutory obligation to dispose of spent nuclear fuel. Consequently, the Company pursued and continues to pursue legal remedies against the U.S. government for its partial breach of contract.
In 2014, the Court of Federal Claims entered a judgment in favor of the Company in its spent nuclear fuel lawsuit seeking damages for the period from January 1, 2005 through December 31, 2010. In 2015, the Company recovered approximately $18 million, based on its ownership interests, which was credited to accounts where the original costs were charged, and used to reduce rate base, fuel, and cost of service for the benefit of customers.
In 2014, the Company filed lawsuits against the U.S. government for the costs of continuing to store spent nuclear fuel at Plant Hatch and Plant Vogtle Units 1 and 2 for the period from January 1, 2011 through December 31, 2013. The damage period was subsequently extended to December 31, 2014. On October 10, 2017, the Company filed additional lawsuits against the U.S. government in the Court of Federal Claims for the costs of continuing to store spent nuclear fuel at Plant Hatch and Plant Vogtle Units 1 and 2 for the period from January 1, 2015 through December 31, 2017. Damages will continue to accumulate until the issue is resolved or storage is provided. No amounts have been recognized in the financial statements as of December 31, 2017 for any potential recoveries from the pending lawsuits. The final outcome of these matters cannot be determined at this time. However, the Company expects to credit any recovery back for the benefit of customers in accordance with direction from the Georgia PSC and, therefore, no material impact on the Company's net income is expected.
On-site dry spent fuel storage facilities are operational at Plant Vogtle Units 1 and 2 and Plant Hatch. Facilities can be expanded to accommodate spent fuel through the expected life of each plant.
FERC Matters
The Company has authority from the FERC to sell electricity at market-based rates. Since 2008, that authority, for certain balancing authority areas, has been conditioned on compliance with the requirements of an energy auction, which the FERC found to be tailored mitigation that addresses potential market power concerns. In accordance with FERC regulations governing such authority, the traditional electric operating companies (including the Company) and Southern Power filed a triennial market power analysis in 2014, which included continued reliance on the energy auction as tailored mitigation. In 2015, the FERC issued an order finding that the traditional electric operating companies' (including the Company's) and Southern Power's existing tailored mitigation may not effectively mitigate the potential to exert market power in certain areas served by the traditional electric operating companies and in some adjacent areas. The FERC directed the traditional electric operating companies (including the Company) and Southern Power to show why market-based rate authority should not be revoked in these areas or to provide a mitigation plan to further address market power concerns. The traditional electric operating companies (including the Company) and Southern Power filed a request for rehearing and filed their response with the FERC in 2015.
In December 2016, the traditional electric operating companies (including the Company) and Southern Power filed an amendment to their market-based rate tariff that proposed certain changes to the energy auction, as well as several non-tariff changes. On February 2, 2017, the FERC issued an order accepting all such changes subject to an additional condition of cost-based price caps for certain sales outside of the energy auction, finding that all of these changes would provide adequate alternative mitigation for

NOTES (continued)
Georgia Power Company 2017 Annual Report

the traditional electric operating companies' (including the Company's) and Southern Power's potential to exert market power in certain areas served by the traditional electric operating companies (including the Company) and in some adjacent areas. On May 17, 2017, the FERC accepted the traditional electric operating companies' (including the Company's) and Southern Power's compliance filing accepting the terms of the order. While the FERC's February 2, 2017 order references the market power proceeding discussed above, it remains a separate, ongoing matter.
On October 25, 2017, the FERC issued an order in response to the traditional electric operating companies' (including the Company's) and Southern Power's June 29, 2017 triennial updated market power analysis. The FERC directed the traditional electric operating companies (including the Company) and Southern Power to show cause within 60 days why market-based rate authority should not be revoked in certain areas adjacent to the area presently under mitigation in accordance with the February 2, 2017 order or to provide a mitigation plan to further address market power concerns. On November 10, 2017, the traditional electric operating companies (including the Company) and Southern Power responded to the FERC and proposed to resolve matters by applying the alternative mitigation authorized by the February 2, 2017 order to the adjacent areas made the subject of the October 25, 2017 order.
The ultimate outcome of these matters cannot be determined at this time.
Retail Regulatory Matters
Rate Plans
Pursuant to the terms and conditions of a settlement agreement related to Southern Company's acquisition of Southern Company Gas approved by the Georgia PSC in April 2016, the 2013 ARP will continue in effect until December 31, 2019, and the Company will be required to file its next base rate case by July 1, 2019. Furthermore, through December 31, 2019, the Company and Atlanta Gas Light Company each will retain their respective merger savings, net of transition costs, as defined in the settlement agreement; through December 31, 2022, such net merger savings applicable to each will be shared on a 60/40 basis with their respective customers; thereafter, all merger savings will be retained by customers.
In accordance with the 2013 ARP, the Georgia PSC approved increases to tariffs effective January 1, 2016 as follows: (1) traditional base tariff rates by approximately $49 million; (2) ECCR tariff by approximately $75 million; (3) Demand-Side Management tariffs by approximately $3 million; and (4) Municipal Franchise Fee tariff by approximately $13 million, for a total increase in base revenues of approximately $140 million. There were no changes to these tariffs in 2017.
Under the 2013 ARP, the Company's retail ROE is set at 10.95% and earnings are evaluated against a retail ROE range of 10.00% to 12.00%. Two-thirds of any earnings above 12.00% will be directly refunded to customers, with the remaining one-third retained by the Company. There will be no recovery of any earnings shortfall below 10.00% on an actual basis. In 2015, the Company's retail ROE was within the allowed retail ROE range. In 2016, the Company's retail ROE exceeded 12.00%, and the Company will refund to retail customers approximately $44 million in 2018, as approved by the Georgia PSC on January 16, 2018. In 2017, the Company's retail ROE was within the allowed retail ROE range, subject to review and approval by the Georgia PSC.
On January 19, 2018, the Georgia PSC issued an order on the Tax Reform Legislation, which was amended on February 16, 2018 (Tax Order). In accordance with the Tax Order, the Company is required to submit its analysis of the Tax Reform Legislation and related recommendations to address the related impacts on the Company's cost of service and annual revenue requirements by March 6, 2018. The ultimate outcome of this matter cannot be determined at this time.
Integrated Resource Plan
In July 2016, the Georgia PSC approved the Company's triennial Integrated Resource Plan (2016 IRP) including the decertification and retirement of Plant Mitchell Units 3, 4A, and 4B (217 MWs) and Plant Kraft Unit 1 (17 MWs), as well as the decertification of the Intercession City unit (143 MWs total capacity). In August 2016, the Plant Mitchell and Plant Kraft units were retired and the Company sold its 33% ownership interest in the Intercession City unit to Duke Energy Florida, LLC.
Additionally, the Georgia PSC approved the Company's environmental compliance strategy and related expenditures proposed in the 2016 IRP, including measures taken to comply with existing government-imposed environmental mandates, subject to limits on expenditures for Plant McIntosh Unit 1 and Plant Hammond Units 1 through 4.
The Georgia PSC approved the reclassification of the remaining net book value of Plant Mitchell Unit 3 and costs associated with materials and supplies remaining at the unit retirement date to a regulatory asset. Recovery of the unit's net book value will continue through December 31, 2019, as provided in the 2013 ARP. The timing of the recovery of the remaining balance of the unit's net book value as of December 31, 2019 and costs associated with materials and supplies remaining at the unit retirement date was deferred for consideration in the Company's 2019 base rate case.

NOTES (continued)
Georgia Power Company 2017 Annual Report

The Georgia PSC also approved the Renewable Energy Development Initiative (REDI) to procure an additional 1,200 MWs of renewable resources primarily utilizing market-based prices established through a competitive bidding process with expected in-service dates between 2018 and 2021. Additionally, 200 MWs of self-build capacity for use by the Company was approved, as well as consideration for no more than 200 MWs of capacity as part of a renewable commercial and industrial program.
In 2017, the Company filed for and received certification for 510 MWs of REDI utility-scale PPAs for solar generation resources, which are expected to be in operation by the end of 2019. The Company also filed for and received approval to develop several solar generation projects to fulfill the approved self-build capacity.
In the 2016 IRP, the Georgia PSC also approved recovery of costs up to $99 million through June 30, 2019 to preserve nuclear generation as an option at a future generation site in Stewart County, Georgia. On March 7, 2017, the Georgia PSC approved the Company's decision to suspend work at the site due to changing economics, including lower load forecasts and fuel costs. The timing of recovery for costs incurred of approximately $50 million is expected to be determined by the Georgia PSC in a future rate case.
Fuel Cost Recovery
The Company has established fuel cost recovery rates approved by the Georgia PSC. In 2015, the Georgia PSC approved the Company's request to lower annual billings by approximately $350 million effective January 1, 2016. In May 2016, the Georgia PSC approved the Company's request to further lower annual billings under an interim fuel rider by approximately $313 million effective June 1, 2016, which expired on December 31, 2017. The Georgia PSC will review the Company's cumulative over or under recovered fuel balance no later than September 1, 2018 and evaluate the need to file a fuel case unless the Company deems it necessary to file a fuel case at an earlier time. The Company continues to be allowed to adjust its fuel cost recovery rates under an interim fuel rider prior to the next fuel case if the under recovered fuel balance exceeds $200 million.
The Company's fuel cost recovery mechanism includes costs associated with a natural gas hedging program, as revised and approved by the Georgia PSC, allowing the use of an array of derivative instruments within a 48-month time horizon.
The Company's under recovered fuel balance totaled $165 million at December 31, 2017 and is included in current assets. At December 31, 2016, the Company's over recovered fuel balance totaled $84 million and is included in over recovered fuel clause revenues, current.
Fuel cost recovery revenues as recorded on the financial statements are adjusted for differences in actual recoverable fuel costs and amounts billed in current regulated rates. Accordingly, changes in the billing factor will not have a significant effect on the Company's revenues or net income, but will affect cash flow.
Storm Damage Recovery
The Company is accruing $30 million annually through December 31, 2019, as provided in the 2013 ARP, for incremental operating and maintenance costs of damage from major storms to its transmission and distribution facilities. Hurricanes Irma and Matthew caused significant damage to the Company's transmission and distribution facilities during September 2017 and October 2016, respectively. The incremental restoration costs related to these hurricanes deferred in the regulatory asset for storm damage totaled approximately $260 million. At December 31, 2017, the total balance in the regulatory asset related to storm damage was $333 million. The rate of storm damage cost recovery is expected to be adjusted as part of the Company's next base rate case required to be filed by July 1, 2019. As a result of this regulatory treatment, costs related to storms are not expected to have a material impact on the Company's financial statements. See Note 1 under "Storm Damage Recovery" for additional information regarding the Company's storm damage reserve.
Nuclear Construction
Project Status
In 2009, the Georgia PSC certified construction of Plant Vogtle Units 3 and 4. In 2012, the NRC issued the related combined construction and operating licenses, which allowed full construction of the two AP1000 nuclear units (with electric generating capacity of approximately 1,100 MWs each) and related facilities to begin. Until March 2017, construction on Plant Vogtle Units 3 and 4 continued under the Vogtle 3 and 4 Agreement, which was a substantially fixed price agreement. On March 29, 2017, the EPC Contractor filed for bankruptcy protection under Chapter 11 of the U.S. Bankruptcy Code.
In connection with the EPC Contractor's bankruptcy filing, the Company, acting for itself and as agent for the Vogtle Owners, entered into the Interim Assessment Agreement with the EPC Contractor to allow construction to continue. The Interim Assessment Agreement expired on July 27, 2017 when the Vogtle Services Agreement became effective. In August 2017, following completion of comprehensive cost to complete and cancellation cost assessments, the Company filed its seventeenth

NOTES (continued)
Georgia Power Company 2017 Annual Report

VCM report with the Georgia PSC, which included a recommendation to continue construction of Plant Vogtle Units 3 and 4, with Southern Nuclear serving as project manager and Bechtel serving as the primary construction contractor. On December 21, 2017, the Georgia PSC approved the Company's recommendation to continue construction.
The Company expects Plant Vogtle Units 3 and 4 to be placed in service by November 2021 and November 2022, respectively. The Company's revised capital cost forecast for its 45.7% proportionate share of Plant Vogtle Units 3 and 4 is $8.8 billion ($7.3 billion after reflecting the impact of payments received under the Guarantee Settlement Agreement and the Customer Refunds, each as defined herein). The Company's CWIP balance for Plant Vogtle Units 3 and 4 was $3.3 billion at December 31, 2017, which is net of the Guarantee Settlement Agreement payments less the Customer Refunds. The Company estimates that its financing costs for construction of Plant Vogtle Units 3 and 4 will total approximately $3.1 billion, of which $1.6 billion had been incurred through December 31, 2017.
Vogtle 3 and 4 Agreement and EPC Contractor Bankruptcy
In 2008, the Company, acting for itself and as agent for the Vogtle Owners, entered into the Vogtle 3 and 4 Agreement. Under the terms of the Vogtle 3 and 4 Agreement, the Vogtle Owners agreed to pay a purchase price subject to certain price escalations and adjustments, including fixed escalation amounts and index-based adjustments, as well as adjustments for change orders, and performance bonuses for early completion and unit performance. Under the Toshiba Guarantee, Toshiba guaranteed certain payment obligations of the EPC Contractor, including any liability of the EPC Contractor for abandonment of work. In the first quarter 2016, Westinghouse delivered to the Vogtle Owners a total of $920 million of letters of credit from financial institutions (Westinghouse Letters of Credit) to secure a portion of the EPC Contractor's potential obligations under the Vogtle 3 and 4 Agreement.
Subsequent to the EPC Contractor bankruptcy filing, a number of subcontractors to the EPC Contractor alleged non-payment by the EPC Contractor for amounts owed for work performed on Plant Vogtle Units 3 and 4. The Company, acting for itself and as agent for the Vogtle Owners, has taken actions to remove liens filed by these subcontractors through the posting of surety bonds. Related to such liens, certain subcontractors have filed, and additional subcontractors may file, actions against the EPC Contractor and the Vogtle Owners to preserve their payment rights with respect to such claims. All amounts associated with the removal of subcontractor liens and other EPC Contractor pre-petition accounts payable have been paid or accrued as of December 31, 2017.
On June 9, 2017, the Company and the other Vogtle Owners and Toshiba entered into a settlement agreement regarding the Toshiba Guarantee (Guarantee Settlement Agreement). Pursuant to the Guarantee Settlement Agreement, Toshiba acknowledged the amount of its obligation was $3.68 billion (Guarantee Obligations), of which the Company's proportionate share was approximately $1.7 billion. The Guarantee Settlement Agreement provided for a schedule of payments for the Guarantee Obligations beginning in October 2017 and continuing through January 2021. Toshiba made the first three payments as scheduled. On December 8, 2017, the Company, the other Vogtle Owners, certain affiliates of the Municipal Electric Authority of Georgia (MEAG Power), and Toshiba entered into Amendment No. 1 to the Guarantee Settlement Agreement (Guarantee Settlement Agreement Amendment). The Guarantee Settlement Agreement Amendment provided that Toshiba's remaining payment obligations under the Guarantee Settlement Agreement were due and payable in full on December 15, 2017, which Toshiba satisfied on December 14, 2017. Pursuant to the Guarantee Settlement Agreement Amendment, Toshiba was deemed to be the owner of certain pre-petition bankruptcy claims of the Company, the other Vogtle Owners, and certain affiliates of MEAG Power against Westinghouse, and the Company and the other Vogtle Owners surrendered the Westinghouse Letters of Credit.
Additionally, on June 9, 2017, the Company, acting for itself and as agent for the other Vogtle Owners, and the EPC Contractor entered into the Vogtle Services Agreement, which was amended and restated on July 20, 2017. On July 20, 2017, the bankruptcy court approved the EPC Contractor's motion seeking authorization to (i) enter into the Vogtle Services Agreement, (ii) assume and assign to the Vogtle Owners certain project-related contracts, (iii) join the Vogtle Owners as counterparties to certain assumed project-related contracts, and (iv) reject the Vogtle 3 and 4 Agreement. The Vogtle Services Agreement, and the EPC Contractor's rejection of the Vogtle 3 and 4 Agreement, became effective upon approval by the DOE on July 27, 2017. The Vogtle Services Agreement will continue until the start-up and testing of Plant Vogtle Units 3 and 4 are complete and electricity is generated and sold from both units. The Vogtle Services Agreement is terminable by the Vogtle Owners upon 30 days' written notice.
Effective October 23, 2017, the Company, acting for itself and as agent for the other Vogtle Owners, entered into a construction completion agreement with Bechtel, whereby Bechtel will serve as the primary contractor for the remaining construction activities for Plant Vogtle Units 3 and 4 (Bechtel Agreement). Facility design and engineering remains the responsibility of the EPC Contractor under the Vogtle Services Agreement. The Bechtel Agreement is a cost reimbursable plus fee arrangement, whereby Bechtel will be reimbursed for actual costs plus a base fee and an at-risk fee, which is subject to adjustment based on Bechtel's performance against cost and schedule targets. Each Vogtle Owner is severally (not jointly) liable for its proportionate share, based on its ownership interest, of all amounts owed to Bechtel under the Bechtel Agreement. The Vogtle Owners may terminate

NOTES (continued)
Georgia Power Company 2017 Annual Report

the Bechtel Agreement at any time for their convenience, provided that the Vogtle Owners will be required to pay amounts related to work performed prior to the termination (including the applicable portion of the base fee), certain termination-related costs, and, at certain stages of the work, the applicable portion of the at-risk fee. Bechtel may terminate the Bechtel Agreement under certain circumstances, including certain Vogtle Owner suspensions of work, certain breaches of the Bechtel Agreement by the Vogtle Owners, Vogtle Owner insolvency, and certain other events. Pursuant to the Loan Guarantee Agreement between the Company and the DOE, the Company is required to obtain the DOE's approval of the Bechtel Agreement prior to obtaining any further advances under the Loan Guarantee Agreement.
On November 2, 2017, the Vogtle Owners entered into an amendment to their joint ownership agreements for Plant Vogtle Units 3 and 4 (as amended, Vogtle Joint Ownership Agreements) to provide for, among other conditions, additional Vogtle Owner approval requirements. Pursuant to the Vogtle Joint Ownership Agreements, the holders of at least 90% of the ownership interests in Plant Vogtle Units 3 and 4 must vote to continue construction if certain adverse events occur, including (i) the bankruptcy of Toshiba; (ii) termination or rejection in bankruptcy of certain agreements, including the Vogtle Services Agreement or the Bechtel Agreement; (iii) the Georgia PSC or the Company determines that any of the Company's costs relating to the construction of Plant Vogtle Units 3 and 4 will not be recovered in retail rates because such costs are deemed unreasonable or imprudent; or (iv) an increase in the construction budget contained in the seventeenth VCM report of more than $1 billion or extension of the project schedule contained in the seventeenth VCM report of more than one year. In addition, pursuant to the Vogtle Joint Ownership Agreements, the required approval of holders of ownership interests in Plant Vogtle Units 3 and 4 is at least (i) 90% for a change of the primary construction contractor and (ii) 67% for material amendments to the Vogtle Services Agreement or agreements with Southern Nuclear or the primary construction contractor, including the Bechtel Agreement. The Vogtle Joint Ownership Agreements also confirm that the Vogtle Owners' sole recourse against the Company or Southern Nuclear for any action or inaction in connection with their performance as agent for the Vogtle Owners is limited to removal of the Company and/or Southern Nuclear as agent, except in cases of willful misconduct.
Regulatory Matters
In 2009, the Georgia PSC voted to certify construction of Plant Vogtle Units 3 and 4 with a certified capital cost of $4.418 billion. In addition, in 2009 the Georgia PSC approved inclusion of the Plant Vogtle Units 3 and 4 related CWIP accounts in rate base, and the State of Georgia enacted the Georgia Nuclear Energy Financing Act, which allows the Company to recover financing costs for nuclear construction projects certified by the Georgia PSC. Financing costs are recovered on all applicable certified costs through annual adjustments to the NCCR tariff up to the certified capital cost of $4.418 billion. As of December 31, 2017, the Company had recovered approximately $1.6 billion of financing costs. On January 30, 2018, the Company filed to decrease the NCCR tariff by approximately $50 million, effective April 1, 2018, pending Georgia PSC approval. The decrease reflects the payments received under the Guarantee Settlement Agreement, refunds to customers ordered by the Georgia PSC aggregating approximately $188 million (Customer Refunds), and the estimated effects of Tax Reform Legislation. The Customer Refunds were recognized as a regulatory liability as of December 31, 2017 and will be paid in three installments of $25 to each retail customer no later than the third quarter 2018.
The Company is required to file semi-annual VCM reports with the Georgia PSC by February 28 and August 31 each year. In October 2013, in connection with the eighth VCM report, the Georgia PSC approved a stipulation (2013 Stipulation) between the Company and the staff of the Georgia PSC to waive the requirement to amend the Plant Vogtle Units 3 and 4 certificate in accordance with the 2009 certification order until the completion of Plant Vogtle Unit 3, or earlier if deemed appropriate by the Georgia PSC and the Company.
On December 20, 2016, the Georgia PSC voted to approve a settlement agreement (Vogtle Cost Settlement Agreement) resolving certain prudency matters in connection with the fifteenth VCM report. On December 21, 2017, the Georgia PSC voted to approve (and issued its related order on January 11, 2018) certain recommendations made by the Company in the seventeenth VCM report and modifying the Vogtle Cost Settlement Agreement. The Vogtle Cost Settlement Agreement, as modified by the January 11, 2018 order, resolved the following regulatory matters related to Plant Vogtle Units 3 and 4: (i) none of the $3.3 billion of costs incurred through December 31, 2015 and reflected in the fourteenth VCM report should be disallowed from rate base on the basis of imprudence; (ii) the Contractor Settlement Agreement was reasonable and prudent and none of the amounts paid pursuant to the Contractor Settlement Agreement should be disallowed from rate base on the basis of imprudence; (iii) (a) capital costs incurred up to $5.680 billion would be presumed to be reasonable and prudent with the burden of proof on any party challenging such costs, (b) the Company would have the burden to show that any capital costs above $5.680 billion were prudent, and (c) a revised capital cost forecast of $7.3 billion (after reflecting the impact of payments received under the Guarantee Settlement Agreement and Customer Refunds) is found reasonable; (iv) construction of Plant Vogtle Units 3 and 4 should be completed, with Southern Nuclear serving as project manager and Bechtel as primary contractor; (v) approved and deemed reasonable the Company's revised schedule placing Plant Vogtle Units 3 and 4 in service in November 2021 and November 2022, respectively;

NOTES (continued)
Georgia Power Company 2017 Annual Report

(vi) confirmed that the revised cost forecast does not represent a cost cap and that prudence decisions on cost recovery will be made at a later date, consistent with applicable Georgia law; (vii) reduced the ROE used to calculate the NCCR tariff (a) from 10.95% (the ROE rate setting point authorized by the Georgia PSC in the 2013 ARP) to 10.00% effective January 1, 2016, (b) from 10.00% to 8.30%, effective January 1, 2020, and (c) from 8.30% to 5.30%, effective January 1, 2021 (provided that the ROE in no case will be less than the Company's average cost of long-term debt); (viii) reduced the ROE used for AFUDC equity for Plant Vogtle Units 3 and 4 from 10.00% to the Company's average cost of long-term debt, effective January 1, 2018; and (ix) agreed that upon Unit 3 reaching commercial operation, retail base rates would be adjusted to include carrying costs on those capital costs deemed prudent in the Vogtle Cost Settlement Agreement. The January 11, 2018 order also stated that if Plant Vogtle Units 3 and 4 are not commercially operational by June 1, 2021 and June 1, 2022, respectively, the ROE used to calculate the NCCR tariff will be further reduced by 10 basis points each month (but not lower than the Company's average cost of long-term debt) until the respective unit is commercially operational. The ROE reductions negatively impacted earnings by approximately $20 million in 2016 and $25 million in 2017 and are estimated to have negative earnings impacts of approximately $120 million in 2018 and an aggregate of $585 million from 2019 to 2022. In its January 11, 2018 order, the Georgia PSC stated if other certain conditions and assumptions upon which the Company's seventeenth VCM report are based do not materialize, both the Company and the Georgia PSC reserve the right to reconsider the decision to continue construction.
On February 12, 2018, Georgia Interfaith Power & Light, Inc. and Partnership for Southern Equity, Inc. filed a petition appealing the Georgia PSC's January 11, 2018 order with the Fulton County Superior Court. The Company believes the appeal has no merit; however, an adverse outcome in this appeal could have a material impact on the Company's results of operations, financial condition, and liquidity.
The IRS allocated PTCs to each of Plant Vogtle Units 3 and 4, which originally required the applicable unit to be placed in service before 2021. Under the Bipartisan Budget Act of 2018, Plant Vogtle Units 3 and 4 continue to qualify for PTCs. The nominal value of the Company's portion of the PTCs is approximately $500 million per unit.
In its January 11, 2018 order, the Georgia PSC also approved $542 million of capital costs incurred during the seventeenth VCM reporting period (January 1, 2017 to June 30, 2017). The Georgia PSC has approved seventeen VCM reports covering the periods through June 30, 2017, including total construction capital costs incurred through that date of $4.4 billion. The Company expects to file its eighteenth VCM report on February 28, 2018 requesting approval of approximately $450 million of construction capital costs (before payments received under the Guarantee Settlement Agreement and the Customer Refunds) incurred from July 1, 2017 through December 31, 2017. The Company's CWIP balance for Plant Vogtle Units 3 and 4 was approximately $4.8 billion as of December 31, 2017, or $3.3 billion net of payments received under the Guarantee Settlement Agreement and the Customer Refunds.
The ultimate outcome of these matters cannot be determined at this time.
Cost and Schedule
The Company's approximate proportionate share of the remaining estimated capital cost to complete Plant Vogtle Units 3 and 4 with in service dates of November 2021 and November 2022, respectively, is as follows:
 (in billions)
Project capital cost forecast$7.3
Net investment as of December 31, 2017(3.4)
Remaining estimate to complete$3.9
Note: Excludes financing costs capitalized through AFUDC and is net of payments received under the Guarantee Settlement Agreement and the Customer Refunds.
The Company estimates that its financing costs for construction of Plant Vogtle Units 3 and 4 will total approximately $3.1 billion, of which $1.6 billion had been incurred through December 31, 2017.
As construction continues, challenges with management of contractors, subcontractors, and vendors, labor productivity and availability, fabrication, delivery, assembly, and installation of plant systems, structures, and components (some of which are based on new technology and have not yet operated in the global nuclear industry at this scale), or other issues could arise and change the projected schedule and estimated cost.
There have been technical and procedural challenges to the construction and licensing of Plant Vogtle Units 3 and 4 at the federal and state level and additional challenges may arise. Processes are in place that are designed to assure compliance with the requirements specified in the Westinghouse Design Control Document and the combined construction and operating licenses, including inspections by Southern Nuclear and the NRC that occur throughout construction. As a result of such compliance

NOTES (continued)
Georgia Power Company 2017 Annual Report

processes, certain license amendment requests have been filed and approved or are pending before the NRC. Various design and other licensing-based compliance matters, including the timely resolution of Inspections, Tests, Analyses, and Acceptance Criteria and the related approvals by the NRC, may arise, which may result in additional license amendments or require other resolution. If any license amendment requests or other licensing-based compliance issues are not resolved in a timely manner, there may be delays in the project schedule that could result in increased costs.
The ultimate outcome of these matters cannot be determined at this time.
Other Matters
As of December 31, 2017, the Company had borrowed $2.6 billion related to Plant Vogtle Units 3 and 4 costs through the Loan Guarantee Agreement and a multi-advance credit facility among the Company, the DOE, and the FFB, which provides for borrowings of up to $3.46 billion, subject to the satisfaction of certain conditions. On September 28, 2017, the DOE issued a conditional commitment to the Company for up to approximately $1.67 billion in additional guaranteed loans under the Loan Guarantee Agreement. This conditional commitment expires on June 30, 2018, subject to any further extension approved by the DOE. Final approval and issuance of these additional loan guarantees by the DOE cannot be assured and are subject to the negotiation of definitive agreements, completion of due diligence by the DOE, receipt of any necessary regulatory approvals, and satisfaction of other conditions. See Note 6 under "DOE Loan Guarantee Borrowings" for additional information, including applicable covenants, events of default, mandatory prepayment events, and conditions to borrowing.
The ultimate outcome of these matters cannot be determined at this time.
4. JOINT OWNERSHIP AGREEMENTS
The Company and Alabama Power own equally all of the outstanding capital stock of SEGCO, which owns electric generating units with a total rated capacity of 1,020 MWs, as well as associated transmission facilities. SEGCO uses natural gas as the primary fuel source for 1,000 MWs of its generating capacity. The capacity of these units is sold equally to the Company and Alabama Power under a power contract. The Company and Alabama Power make payments sufficient to provide for the operating expenses, taxes, interest expense, and an ROE. The Company's share of purchased power totaled $78 million in 2017, $57 million in 2016, and $78 million in 2015 and is included in purchased power, affiliates in the statements of income. The Company accounts for SEGCO using the equity method. See Note 7 under "Guarantees" for additional information.
The Company owns undivided interests in Plants Vogtle, Hatch, Wansley, and Scherer in varying amounts jointly with one or more of the following entities: Oglethorpe Power Corporation (OPC), MEAG Power, the City of Dalton, Georgia, acting by and through its Board of Water, Light, and Sinking Fund Commissioners, doing business as Dalton Utilities, Florida Power & Light Company, Jacksonville Electric Authority, and Gulf Power. Under these agreements, the Company has been contracted to operate and maintain the plants as agent for the co-owners and is jointly and severally liable for third party claims related to these plants. In addition, the Company jointly owns the Rocky Mountain pumped storage hydroelectric plant with OPC, which is the operator of the plant. In August 2016, the Company sold its 33% ownership interest in the Intercession City combustion turbine unit to Duke Energy Florida, LLC.
At December 31, 2017, the Company's percentage ownership and investment (exclusive of nuclear fuel) in jointly-owned facilities in commercial operation with the above entities were as follows:
Facility (Type)Company Ownership Plant in Service Accumulated Depreciation CWIP
   (in millions)
Plant Vogtle (nuclear)       
Units 1 and 245.7% $3,564
 $2,141
 $70
Plant Hatch (nuclear)50.1
 1,321
 595
 87
Plant Wansley (coal)53.5
 1,053
 335
 72
Plant Scherer (coal)       
Units 1 and 28.4
 261
 93
 8
Unit 375.0
 1,232
 468
 26
Rocky Mountain (pumped storage)25.4
 182
 132
 
The Company's proportionate share of its plant operating expenses is included in the corresponding operating expenses in the statements of income and the Company is responsible for providing its own financing.

NOTES (continued)
Georgia Power Company 2017 Annual Report

The Company also owns 45.7% of Plant Vogtle Units 3 and 4, which are currently under construction and had a CWIP balance of $3.3 billion as of December 31, 2017. See Note 3 under "Retail Regulatory Matters – Nuclear Construction" for additional information.
5. INCOME TAXESConsolidated Income Taxes
On behalf of the Company,Southern Power, Southern Company files a consolidated federal income tax return and various combined and separate state income tax returns.returns, some of which are combined or unitary. Under a joint consolidated income tax allocation agreement, each Southern Company subsidiary's current and deferred tax expense is computed on a stand-alone basis and no subsidiary is allocated more current expense than would be paid if it filed a separate income tax return. In accordance with IRS regulations, each company is jointly and severally liable for the federal tax liability.
The impact of certain tax events at Southern Company and/or its other subsidiaries can, and does, affect Southern Power's ability to utilize certain tax credits. See "Tax Credits" and ACCOUNTING POLICIES – "Application of Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates" herein and Note 10 to the financial statements for additional information.
Southern Power currently has unutilized federal ITC and PTC carryforwards totaling approximately $2.1 billion, and thus has utilized tax equity partnerships where the tax partner will take significantly all of the respective federal tax benefits on a prospective basis. These tax equity partnerships are consolidated in Southern Power's financial statements using the HLBV methodology to allocate partnership gains and losses. See Note 1 to the financial statements for additional information.
Federal Tax Reform Legislation
In December 2017, the Tax Reform Legislation was signed into law and became effective on January 1, 2018. The Tax Reform Legislation, among other things, reduced the federal corporate income tax rate to 21%, retained existing renewable energy incentives, and repealed the corporate alternative minimum tax. In addition, under the Tax Reform Legislation, NOLs generated after December 31, 2017 can no longer be carried back to previous tax years but can be carried forward indefinitely, with utilization limited to 80% of taxable income of the subsequent tax year. The projected reduction of Southern Company's consolidated income tax liability resulting from the tax rate reduction also delays the expected utilization of existing tax credit carryforwards.
Following the enactment of the Tax Reform Legislation, the SEC staff issued Staff Accounting Bulletin 118 – "Income Tax Accounting Implications of the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act" (SAB 118), which providesprovided for a measurement period of up to one year from the enactment date to complete accounting under GAAP for the tax effects of the legislation. Due to the complex and comprehensive nature of the enacted tax law changes and their application under GAAP, the Company considersSouthern Power considered all amounts recorded in the financial statements as a result of the Tax Reform Legislation to be "provisional" as discussed in SAB 118 and subject to revision. The Company is awaiting additional guidancerevision prior to filing its 2017 tax return in the fourth quarter 2018. Southern Power recognized tax benefits of $743 million in 2017. Following the filing of its 2017 tax return, Southern Power recorded tax expense of $79 million to adjust the provisional amount for a total net tax benefit of $664 million as a result of the Tax Reform Legislation. As of December 31, 2018, Southern Power considered the measurement of impacts from industry and income tax authorities in order to finalize its accounting. The ultimate impact ofthe Tax Reform Legislation on deferred income tax assets and liabilities, primarily due to the impact of the reduction of the corporate income tax rate, to be complete.
However, the IRS continues to issue regulations that provide further interpretation and guidance on the related regulatory assetslaw and liabilitieseach state's adoption of the provisions contained in the Tax Reform Legislation remains uncertain. The ultimate impact of this matter cannot be determined at this time. In addition, the regulatory treatment of certain impacts of the Tax Reform Legislation is subject to the discretion of the FERC. See Note 310 to the financial statements under "Retail Regulatory Matters – Rate Plans""Current and Deferred Income Taxes" for additional information.
CurrentTax Credits
The Tax Reform Legislation retained the renewable energy incentives that were included in the PATH Act. The PATH Act allows for 30% ITC for solar projects that commence construction by December 31, 2019; 26% ITC for solar projects that commence construction in 2020; 22% ITC for solar projects that commence construction in 2021; and Deferred Income Taxes
Detailsa permanent 10% ITC for solar projects that commence construction on or after January 1, 2022. In addition, the PATH Act allows for 100% PTC for wind projects that commenced construction in 2016; 80% PTC for wind projects that commenced construction in 2017; 60% PTC for wind projects that commence construction in 2018; and 40% PTC for wind projects that commence construction in 2019. Wind projects commencing construction after 2019 will not be entitled to any PTCs. Southern Power has received ITCs related to its investment in new solar facilities acquired or constructed and receives PTCs related to the first 10 years of incomeenergy production from its wind facilities, which have had, and may continue to have, a material impact on Southern Power's cash flows and net income. In 2018, Southern Power sold noncontrolling tax provisions are as follows:
 2017 2016 2015
 (in millions)
Federal –     
Current$256
 $391
 $515
Deferred504
 319
 176
 760
 710
 691
State –     
Current116
 6
 81
Deferred(46) 64
 (3)
 70
 70
 78
Total$830
 $780
 $769
equity interests in SP Wind and Cactus Flats, which both qualify for PTCs, and Gaskell West 1, which qualifies for ITCs. Under these partnerships, the tax equity investors will receive 99% of the PTC and ITC tax benefits and, therefore, Southern Power's tax benefits will be materially reduced. At December 31, 2018,
    Table of Contents                                Index to Financial Statements

NOTESMANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS (continued)
GeorgiaSouthern Power Company 2017and Subsidiary Companies 2018 Annual Report

The tax effectsSouthern Power had approximately $2.1 billion of temporary differences between the carrying amounts of assetsunutilized ITCs and liabilities inPTCs, which are currently expected to be fully utilized by 2022, but could be further delayed. See Note 1 to the financial statements under "Income and their respectiveOther Taxes" and Note 10 to the financial statements under "Current and Deferred Income Taxes – Tax Credit Carryforwards" and "Effective Tax Rate" for additional information regarding utilization and amortization of credits and the tax bases, which give risebenefit related to deferred tax assets and liabilities, are as follows:associated basis differences.
Bonus Depreciation
 2017 2016
 (in millions)
Deferred tax liabilities –   
Accelerated depreciation$3,540
 $5,266
Property basis differences
 957
Employee benefit obligations287
 428
Premium on reacquired debt34
 56
Regulatory assets –   
Storm damage reserves89
 83
Employee benefit obligations348
 546
Asset retirement obligations501
 726
Retired assets30
 55
Asset retirement obligations132
 182
Other100
 83
Total5,061
 8,382
Deferred tax assets –   
Federal effect of state deferred taxes72
 173
Employee benefit obligations423
 661
Property basis differences92
 105
Other deferred costs69
 100
State investment tax credit carryforward318
 201
Federal tax credit carryforward97
 84
Unbilled fuel revenue26
 47
Regulatory liabilities associated with asset retirement obligations5
 33
Asset retirement obligations631
 908
Regulatory liability associated with Tax Reform Legislation (not subject to normalization)123
 
Other30
 70
Total1,886
 2,382
Accumulated deferred income taxes$3,175
 $6,000
The implementation ofUnder the Tax Reform Legislation, significantly reduced accumulated deferred income taxes, partially offset byprojects with binding contracts prior to September 28, 2017 and placed in service after September 27, 2017 remain eligible for bonus depreciation provisionsunder the PATH Act. The PATH Act allowed for 50% bonus depreciation for 2015 through 2017, 40% bonus depreciation for 2018, and 30% bonus depreciation for 2019 and certain long-lived assets placed in service in 2020. Southern Power is not expecting material cash flows from bonus depreciation for the 2018 or 2019 tax years. However, any cash flows resulting from bonus depreciation would also be impacted by Southern Power's use of the Protecting Americans from Tax Hikes Act. Tax Reform Legislation also reduced tax-related regulatory assets and significantly increased tax-related regulatory liabilities.
At December 31, 2017, tax-related regulatory assets to be recovered from customers were $521 million. These assets are primarily attributable to tax benefits flowed through to customers in prior years and deferred taxes previously recognized at rates lower than the current enacted tax law.
At December 31, 2017, tax-related regulatory liabilities to be credited to customers were $3.2 billion. These liabilities are primarily attributable to deferred taxes previously recognized at rates higher than the current enacted tax law.
In accordance with regulatory requirements, federal ITCs are deferred and, upon utilization, amortized over the average life of the related property with such amortization normally applied as a credit to reduce depreciation in the statements of income. Credits amortized in this manner amounted to $10 million in each of 2017, 2016, and 2015. State investment tax credits are recognized in the period in which the credits are generated and totaled $50 million in 2017, $42 million in 2016, and $33 million in 2015. At December 31, 2017, the Company had $87 million in federal ITC carryforwards that will expire by 2037 and $318 million in state ITC carryforwards that will expire between 2020 and 2028.

NOTES (continued)
Georgia Power Company 2017 Annual Report

Effective Tax Rate
A reconciliation of the federal statutory income tax rateequity partnerships. See Note 10 to the effective income tax rate is as follows:
 2017 2016 2015
Federal statutory rate35.0 % 35.0 % 35.0 %
State income tax, net of federal deduction2.0
 2.1
 2.5
Non-deductible book depreciation0.7
 0.8
 1.2
AFUDC equity(0.6) (0.8) (0.7)
Tax Reform Legislation(0.4) 
 
Other
 (0.4) (0.4)
Effective income tax rate36.7 % 36.7 % 37.6 %
In March 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-09, which changed the accounting for income taxes for share-based payment award transactions. Entities are required to recognize all excess tax benefitsfinancial statements under "Current and deficiencies related to the exercise or vesting of stock compensation as income tax expense or benefit in the income statement. The adoption of ASU 2016-09 did not have a material impact on the Company's overall effective tax rate. See Note 1 under "Recently Issued Accounting Standards"Deferred Income Taxes" for additional information.
Unrecognized Tax Benefits
The Company had no material unrecognized tax benefits asultimate outcome of December 31, 2017 and no material changes in unrecognized tax benefits for any year presented.
The Company classifies interest on tax uncertainties as interest expense; however, the Company did not have any accrued interest or penalties for unrecognized tax benefits for any year presented.
It is reasonably possible that the amount of the unrecognized tax benefits could change within 12 months. The settlement of federal and state audits could impact the balances significantly. At this time, an estimate of the range of reasonably possible outcomesthese matters cannot be determined.
The IRS has finalized its audits of Southern Company's consolidated federal income tax returns through 2016. Southern Company is a participant in the Compliance Assurance Process of the IRS. The audits for the Company's state income tax returns have either been concluded, or the statute of limitations has expired, for years prior to 2011.determined at this time.
6. FINANCING
Securities Due Within One Year
A summary of scheduled maturities of securities due within one year at December 31 was as follows:
 2017 2016
 (in millions)
Senior notes$750
 $450
Capital leases11
 10
Other long-term debt


100
 
Unamortized debt issuance expense(1) 
Total$860
 $460
Maturities through 2022 applicable to total long-term debt are as follows: $861 million in 2018; $513 million in 2019; $1.0 billion in 2020; $375 million in 2021; and $518 million in 2022.
Bank Term Loans
In June 2017, the Company entered into three floating rate bank loans in aggregate principal amounts of $50 million, $150 million, and $100 million, with maturity dates of December 1, 2017, May 31, 2018, and June 28, 2018, respectively, bearing interest based on one-month LIBOR. Also in June 2017, the Company borrowed $500 million pursuant to an uncommitted bank credit arrangement, which bears interest at a rate agreed upon by the Company and the bank from time to time and is payable on no less than 30 days' demand by the bank. The proceeds from these bank loans were used to repay a portion of the Company's

NOTES (continued)
Georgia Power Company 2017 Annual Report

existing indebtedness and for working capital and other general corporate purposes, including the Company's continuous construction program.
In August 2017, the Company repaid $250 million of the $500 million aggregate principal amount outstanding pursuant to its uncommitted bank credit arrangement. Also in August 2017, the Company amended its $100 million floating rate bank loan to extend the maturity date from June 28, 2018 to October 26, 2018. In December 2017, the Company repaid the remaining $250 million aggregate principal amount outstanding pursuant to its uncommitted bank credit arrangement.
At December 31, 2017, the Company had a total of $250 million in bank term loans outstanding. Subsequent to December 31, 2017, the Company repaid its outstanding $150 million and $100 million floating rate bank loans due May 31, 2018 and October 26, 2018, respectively. At December 31, 2016, the Company had no bank term loans outstanding.
The outstanding bank loans as of December 31, 2017 had covenants that limited debt levels to 65% of total capitalization, as defined in the agreements. For purposes of these definitions, debt excludes certain hybrid securities. At December 31, 2017, the Company was in compliance with its debt limits.
Senior Notes
In March 2017, the Company issued $450 million aggregate principal amount of Series 2017A 2.00% Senior Notes due March 30, 2020 and $400 million aggregate principal amount of Series 2017B 3.25% Senior Notes due March 30, 2027. The proceeds were used to repay a portion of the Company's short-term indebtedness and for general corporate purposes, including the Company's continuous construction program.
In August 2017, the Company issued $500 million aggregate principal amount of Series 2017C 2.00% Senior Notes due September 8, 2020. The proceeds were used to repay the Company's $50 million floating rate bank loan due December 1, 2017 and outstanding commercial paper borrowings and for general corporate purposes.Acquisitions
At December 31, 2017During 2018, Southern Power acquired and 2016,completed the Company had $7.1 billionproject below and $6.2 billion of senior notes outstanding, respectively, which included senior notes due within one year. These senior notes are effectively subordinated to all secured debt ofacquired the Company, which aggregated $2.8 billion at both December 31, 2017Wild Horse Mountain and 2016. As of December 31, 2017, the Company's secured debt included borrowings of $2.6 billion guaranteed by the DOE and capital lease obligations of $154 million. As of December 31, 2016, the Company's secured debt included borrowings of $2.6 billion guaranteed by the DOE and capital lease obligations of $169 million.Reading wind facilities discussed under "Construction Projects" herein. See Note 7 and "DOE Loan Guarantee Borrowings" herein15 to the financial statements under "Southern Power" for additional information.
Pollution Control Revenue Bonds
Pollution control revenue bond obligations represent loans to the Company from public authorities of funds derived from sales by such authorities of revenue bonds issued to finance pollution control and solid waste disposal facilities. The Company is required to make payments sufficient for the authorities to meet principal and interest requirements of such bonds. The amount of tax-exempt pollution control revenue bond obligations outstanding at both December 31, 2017 and 2016 was $1.8 billion.
In April 2017, the Company purchased and held $27 million aggregate principal amount of Development Authority of Burke County (Georgia) Pollution Control Revenue Bonds (Georgia Power Company Plant Vogtle Project), Fifth Series 1995. In October 2017, the Company remarketed these bonds to the public.
In August 2017, the Company purchased and held $38 million aggregate principal amount of Development Authority of Bartow County (Georgia) Pollution Control Revenue Bonds (Georgia Power Company Plant Bowen Project), First Series 1997. In October 2017, the Company remarketed these bonds to the public.
Junior Subordinated Notes
At December 31, 2017, the Company had a total of $270 million of junior subordinated notes outstanding. At December 31, 2016, the Company had no junior subordinated notes outstanding.
In September 2017, the Company issued $270 million aggregate principal amount of Series 2017A 5.00% Junior Subordinated Notes due October 1, 2077. The proceeds were used to redeem all outstanding shares of the Company's preferred and preference stock. See "Outstanding Classes of Capital Stock" herein for additional information.
DOE Loan Guarantee Borrowings
Pursuant to the loan guarantee program established under Title XVII of the Energy Policy Act of 2005 (Title XVII Loan Guarantee Program), the Company and the DOE entered into the Loan Guarantee Agreement in 2014, under which the DOE agreed to guarantee the obligations of the Company under a note purchase agreement (FFB Note Purchase Agreement) among the DOE, the Company, and the FFB and a related promissory note (FFB Promissory Note). The FFB Note Purchase Agreement and

NOTES (continued)
Georgia Power Company 2017 Annual Report

Project FacilityResourceSeller, Acquisition Date
Approximate Nameplate Capacity (MW)
Location
Ownership
Percentage
Actual CODPPA CounterpartiesPPA Contract Period
Gaskell West 1SolarRecurrent Energy Development Holdings, LLC, January 26, 201820Kern County, CA100% of Class B(*)March 2018Southern California Edison20 years
(*)Southern Power owns 100% of the class B membership interests under a tax equity partnership.
the FFB Promissory Note provide for a multi-advance term loanThe Gaskell West 1 facility (FFB Credit Facility), under which the Company may make term loan borrowings through the FFB.
On July 27, 2017, the Company entered into an amendmentdid not have operating revenues or activities prior to the Loan Guarantee Agreement (LGA Amendment) in connection with the DOE's consent to the Company's entry into the Vogtle Services Agreement and the related intellectual property licenses (IP Licenses).
Under the terms of the Loan Guarantee Agreement, upon termination of the Vogtle 3 and 4 Agreement, further advances are conditioned upon the DOE's approval of any agreements entered into in replacement of the Vogtle 3 and 4 Agreement. Under the terms of the LGA Amendment, the Company will not request any advances unless and until certain conditions are satisfied, including (i) receipt of the DOE's approval of the Bechtel Agreement (together with the Vogtle Services Agreement and the IP Licenses, the Replacement EPC Arrangements) and (ii) the Company's entry into a further amendment to the Loan Guarantee Agreement with the DOE to reflect the Replacement EPC Arrangements.
Proceeds of advances made under the FFB Credit Facility are used to reimburse the Company for Eligible Project Costs. Aggregate borrowings under the FFB Credit Facility may not exceed the lesser of (i) 70% of Eligible Project Costs or (ii) approximately $3.46 billion.
On September 28, 2017, the DOE issued a conditional commitment to the Company for up to approximately $1.67 billion of additional guaranteed loans under the Loan Guarantee Agreement. This conditional commitment expires on June 30, 2018, subject to any further extension approved by the DOE. Final approval and issuance of these additional loan guarantees by the DOE cannot be assured and are subject to the negotiation of definitive agreements, completion of due diligence by the DOE, receipt of any necessary regulatory approvals, and satisfaction of other conditions.
All borrowings under the FFB Credit Facility are full recourse to the Company, and the Company is obligated to reimburse the DOE for any payments the DOE is required to make to the FFB under the guarantee. The Company's reimbursement obligations to the DOE are full recourse and secured by a first priority lien on (i) the Company's 45.7% undivided ownership interest in Plant Vogtle Units 3 and 4 (primarily the units under construction, the related real property, and any nuclear fuel loaded in the reactor core) and (ii) the Company's rights and obligations under the principal contracts relating to Plant Vogtle Units 3 and 4. There are no restrictions on the Company's ability to grant liens on other property.
In addition to the conditions described above, future advances are subject to satisfaction of customary conditions, as well as certification of compliance with the requirements of the Title XVII Loan Guarantee Program, including accuracy of project-related representations and warranties, delivery of updated project-related information, and evidence of compliance with the prevailing wage requirements of the Davis-Bacon Act of 1931, as amended, and certification from the DOE's consulting engineer that proceeds of the advances are used to reimburse Eligible Project Costs.
Upon satisfaction of all conditions described above, advances may be requested under the FFB Credit Facility on a quarterly basis through 2020. The final maturity date for each advance under the FFB Credit Facility is February 20, 2044. Interest is payable quarterly and principal payments will begin on February 20, 2020. Borrowings under the FFB Credit Facility will bear interest at the applicable U.S. Treasury rate plus a spread equal to 0.375%.
At both December 31, 2017 and 2016, the Company had $2.6 billion of borrowings outstanding under the FFB Credit Facility.
Under the Loan Guarantee Agreement, the Company is subject to customary borrower affirmative and negative covenants and events of default. In addition, the Company is subject to project-related reporting requirements and other project-specific covenants and events of default.
In the event certain mandatory prepayment events occur, the FFB's commitment to make further advances under the FFB Credit Facility will terminate and the Company will be required to prepay the outstanding principal amount of all borrowings under the FFB Credit Facility over a period of five years (with level principal amortization). Among other things, these mandatory prepayment events include (i) the termination of the Vogtle Services Agreement or rejection of the Vogtle Services Agreement in bankruptcy if the Company does not maintain access to intellectual property rights under the IP Licenses; (ii) a decision by the Company not to continue construction of Plant Vogtle Units 3 and 4; (iii) cancellation of Plant Vogtle Units 3 and 4 by the Georgia PSC, or by the Company if authorized by the Georgia PSC; and (iv) cost disallowances by the Georgia PSC that could have a material adverse effect on completion of Plant Vogtle Units 3 and 4 or the Company's ability to repay the outstanding borrowings under the FFB Credit Facility. Under certain circumstances, insurance proceeds and any proceeds from an event of taking must be applied to immediately prepay outstanding borrowings under the FFB Credit Facility. In addition, if the Company discontinues construction of Plant Vogtle Units 3 and 4, the Company would be obligated to immediately repay a portion of the outstanding borrowings under the FFB Credit Facility to the extent such outstanding borrowings exceed 70% of Eligible Project Costs, net of the proceeds received by the Company under the Guarantee Settlement Agreement. The Company also may

NOTES (continued)
Georgia Power Company 2017 Annual Report

voluntarily prepay outstanding borrowings under the FFB Credit Facility. Under the FFB Credit Facility, any prepayment (whether mandatory or optional) will be made with a make-whole premium or discount, as applicable.
In connection with any cancellation of Plant Vogtle Units 3 and 4 that results in a mandatory prepayment event, the DOE may elect to continue construction of Plant Vogtle Units 3 and 4. In such an event, the DOE will have the right to assume the Company's rights and obligations under the principal agreements relating to Plant Vogtle Units 3 and 4 and to acquire all or a portion of the Company's ownership interest in Plant Vogtle Units 3 and 4.
Capital Leases
Assets acquired under capital leases are recorded in the balance sheets as utility plantbeing placed in service and the related obligations are classified as long-term debt. At December 31, 2017 and 2016, the Company had a capital lease asset for its corporate headquarters building of $61 million, with accumulated depreciation at December 31, 2017 and 2016 of $39 million and $33 million, respectively. At December 31, 2017 and 2016, the capitalized lease obligation was $22 million and $28 million, respectively, with an annual interest rate of 7.9%. For ratemaking purposes, the Georgia PSC has allowed the lease payments in cost of service with no return on the capital lease asset. The difference between the depreciation and the lease payments allowed for ratemaking purposes is recovered as operating expenses as ordered by the Georgia PSC. The annual operating expense incurred for this capital lease was not material for any year presented.
At December 31, 2017 and 2016, the Company had capital lease assets related to two PPAs with Southern Power of $144 million and $149 million, respectively, with accumulated amortization at December 31, 2017 and 2016 of $29 million and $19 million, respectively. At December 31, 2017 and 2016, the related capitalized lease obligations were $132 million and $141 million, respectively. The annual interest rates range from 10% to 12% for these two capital lease PPAs. For ratemaking purposes, the Georgia PSC has included the capital lease asset amortization in cost of service and the interest in the Company's cost of debt. See Note 1 under "Affiliate Transactions" and Note 7 under "Fuel and Purchased Power Agreements" for additional information.
Assets Subject to Lien
See "DOE Loan Guarantee Borrowings" above for information regarding certain borrowings of the Company that are secured by a first priority lien on (i) the Company's 45.7% undivided ownership interest in Plant Vogtle Units 3 and 4 (primarily the units under construction, the related real property, and any nuclear fuel loaded in the reactor core) and (ii) the Company's rights and obligations under the principal contracts relating to Plant Vogtle Units 3 and 4.
See "Capital Leases" above for information regarding certain assets held under capital leases.
Outstanding Classes of Capital Stock
The Company currently has preferred stock, Class A preferred stock, preference stock, and common stock authorized. The Company has shares of its common stock outstanding. In October 2017, the Company redeemed all 1.8 million shares ($45 million aggregate liquidation amount) of its 6.125% Series Class A Preferred Stock and 2.25 millionshares ($225 millionaggregate liquidation amount) of its 6.50% Series 2007A Preference Stock. No shares of preferred stock, Class A preferred stock, or preference stock were outstanding at December 31, 2017.
Dividend Restrictions
The Company can only pay dividends to Southern Company out of retained earnings or paid-in-capital.
Bank Credit Arrangements
At December 31, 2017, the Company had a $1.75 billion committed credit arrangement with banks, of which $1.73 billion was unused. In May 2017, the Company amended its multi-year credit arrangement which, among other things, extended the maturity date from 2020 to 2022.
This bank credit arrangement requires payment of commitment fees based on the unused portion of the commitments. Commitment fees average less than 1/4 of 1% for the Company.
This bank credit arrangement contains a covenant that limits the Company's debt levels to 65% of total capitalization, as defined in the agreement. For purposes of this definition, debt excludes certain hybrid securities. At December 31, 2017, the Company was in compliance with the debt limit covenant.
Subject to applicable market conditions, the Company expects to renew this bank credit arrangement, as needed, prior to expiration. In connection therewith, the Company may extend the maturity date and/or increase or decrease the lending commitments thereunder.

NOTES (continued)
Georgia Power Company 2017 Annual Report

A portion of the $1.73 billion unused credit with banks is allocated to provide liquidity support to the Company's pollution control revenue bonds and commercial paper program. The amount of variable rate pollution control revenue bonds outstanding requiring liquidity support as of December 31, 2017 was $550 million as compared to $868 million at December 31, 2016. In addition, at December 31, 2017, the Company had $469 million of pollution control revenue bonds outstanding that were required to be remarketed within the next 12 months.
The Company makes short-term borrowings primarily through a commercial paper program that has the liquidity support of the Company's committed bank credit arrangement described above. Commercial paper is included in notes payable in the balance sheets.
Details of short-term borrowings outstanding were as follows:
 Short-term Debt at the End of the Period
 Amount Outstanding Weighted Average Interest Rate
 (in millions)  
December 31, 2017:   
Short-term bank debt$150
 2.2%
December 31, 2016:   
Commercial paper$392
 1.1%
during March 2018.
7. COMMITMENTSConstruction Projects
Fuel and PurchasedConstruction Projects Completed and/or in Progress
During 2018, in accordance with its growth strategy, Southern Power Agreements
To supply a portionstarted, continued, or completed construction of the fuel requirements of its generating plants, the Company has entered into various long-term commitments for the procurement and delivery of fossil and nuclear fuel which are not recognized on the balance sheets. In 2017, 2016, and 2015, the Company incurred fuel expense of $1.7 billion, $1.8 billion, and $2.0 billion, respectively, the majority of which was purchased under long-term commitments. The Company expects that a substantial amount of its future fuel needs will continue to be purchased under long-term commitments.
The Company has commitments regarding a portion of a 5% interestprojects set forth in the original cost of Plant Vogtle Units 1 and 2 owned by MEAG Power that are in effect until the latter of the retirement of the plant or the latest stated maturity date of MEAG Power's bonds issued to finance such ownership interest. The payments for capacity are required whether or not any capacity is available. The energy cost is a function of each unit's variable operating costs. Portions of the capacity payments relate to costs in excess of MEAG Power's Plant Vogtle Units 1 and 2 allowed investment for ratemaking purposes. The present value of these portions at the time of the disallowance was written off. Generally, the cost of such capacity and energy is included in purchased power, non-affiliates in the statements of income. Capacity payments totaled $9 million, $11 million, and table below.$10 million in 2017, 2016, and 2015, respectively.

NOTES (continued)
Georgia Power Company 2017 Annual Report

The Company has also entered into various long-term PPAs, some of which are accounted for as capital or operating leases. Total capacity expense under PPAs accounted for as operating leases was $199 million, $217 million, and $203 million for 2017, 2016, and 2015, respectively. Contingent rent expense under energy-only solar PPAs of $73 million, $39 million, and $8 million for 2017, 2016, and 2015, respectively, was recognized as services were performed. Estimated total long-term obligations at December 31, 2017 were as follows:
 Affiliate Capital Leases Affiliate Operating Leases 
Non-Affiliate
Operating
Leases
 
Vogtle
Units 1 and 2
Capacity
Payments
 Total
 (in millions)
2018$23
 $62
 $127
 $7
 $219
201923
 63
 128
 6
 220
202023
 65
 124
 4
 216
202124
 66
 125
 5
 220
202224
 67
 126
 4
 221
2023 and thereafter182
 412
 773
 38
 1,405
Total$299
 $735
 $1,403
 $64
 $2,501
Less: amounts representing executory costs(a)
45
        
Net minimum lease payments254
        
Less: amounts representing interest(b)
120
        
Present value of net minimum lease payments$134
        
Project FacilityResource
Approximate Nameplate Capacity (MW)
 LocationOwnership PercentageActual / Expected CODPPA CounterpartiesPPA Contract Period
Construction Projects Completed During the Year Ended December 31, 2018
Cactus Flats (a)
Wind148 Concho County, TX100% of Class B July 2018General Motors, LLC and General Mills Operations, LLC12 years and 15 years
Projects Under Construction at December 31, 2018
Mankato expansion (b)
Natural Gas385 Mankato, MN100% Second quarter 2019Northern States Power Company20 years
Wild Horse Mountain (c)
Wind100 Pushmataha County, OK100% Fourth quarter 2019Arkansas Electric Cooperative20 years
Reading (d)
Wind200 Osage and Lyon Counties, KS100% Second quarter 2020Royal Caribbean Cruises LTD12 years
(a)
Executory costs such as taxes, maintenance,In July 2017, Southern Power purchased 100% of the Cactus Flats facility. In August 2018, Southern Power closed on a tax equity partnership and insurance (includingnow owns 100% of the estimated profit thereon) are estimated and included in total minimum lease payments.
class B membership interests.
(b)Calculated usingIn November 2018, Southern Power entered into an adjusted incremental borrowing rateagreement to reduce the present valuesell all of the net minimum lease payments to fair value.
SCS may enter into various types of wholesale energy and natural gas contracts acting as an agent for the Company and all of the other traditional electric operating companies and Southern Power. Under these agreements, each of the traditional electric operating companies and Southern Power may be jointly and severally liable. Accordingly, Southern Company has entered into keep-well agreements with the Company and each of the other traditional electric operating companies to ensure the Company will not subsidize or be responsible for any costs, losses, liabilities, or damages resulting from the inclusion of Southern Power as a contracting partyits equity interests in Plant Mankato, including this expansion currently under these agreements.
Operating Leases
The Company has entered into operating leases with Southern Linc and third parties for the use of cellular tower space. Substantially all of these agreements have initial terms ranging from five to 10 years and renewal options of up to 20 years. The Company has also entered into rental agreements for facilities, railcars, and other equipment with various terms and expiration dates. Total rent expense was $31 million, $28 million, and $29 million for 2017, 2016, and 2015, respectively. The Company includes any step rents, fixed escalations, and lease concessions in its computation of minimum lease payments.

NOTES (continued)
Georgia Power Company 2017 Annual Report

As of December 31, 2017, estimated minimum lease payments under operating leases were as follows:
 Minimum Lease Payments
 
Affiliate Operating Leases(a)
 
Non-Affiliate Operating Leases (b)
 Total
 (in millions)
2018$10
 $14
 $24
201911
 11
 22
202011
 9
 20
20219
 8
 17
20228
 6
 14
2023 and thereafter33
 11
 44
Total$82
 $59
 $141
(a)Includes operating leases for cellular tower space.
(b)Includes operating leases for cellular tower space, facilities, railcars, and other equipment.
Railcar minimum lease payments are disclosed at 100% of railcar lease obligations; however, a portion of these obligations is shared with the joint owners of Plants Scherer and Wansley. A majority of the rental expenses related to the railcar leases are recoverable through the fuel cost recovery clause as ordered by the Georgia PSC and the remaining portion is recovered through base rates.
In addition to the above rental commitments, the Company has obligations upon expiration of certain railcar leases with respect to the residual value of the leased property. These leases have terms expiring through 2024 with maximum obligations under these leases of $32 million. At the termination of the leases, the Company may either renew the lease, exercise its purchase option, or the property can be sold to a third party. The Company expects that the fair market value of the leased property would reduce the Company's payments under the residual value obligations.
Guarantees
Alabama Power has guaranteed the obligations of SEGCO for $25 million of pollution control revenue bonds issued in 2001, which mature in June 2019, and also $100 million of senior notes issued in 2013, which mature in December 2018. The Company has agreed to reimburse Alabama Power for the pro rata portion of such obligations corresponding to the Company's then proportionate ownership of SEGCO's stock if Alabama Power is called upon to make such payment under its guarantee. See Note 4 for additional information.
In addition, in 2013, the Company entered into an agreement that requires the Company to guarantee certain payments of a gas supplier for Plant McIntosh for a period up to 15 years. The guarantee is expected to be terminated if certain events occur within one year of the initial gas deliveries in 2018. In the event the gas supplier defaults on payments, the maximum potential exposure under the guarantee is approximately $43 million.
As discussed earlier in this Note under "Operating Leases," the Company has entered into certain residual value guarantees related to railcar leases.
8. STOCK COMPENSATION
Stock-Based Compensation
Stock-based compensation primarily in the form of Southern Company performance share units and restricted stock units may be granted through the Omnibus Incentive Compensation Plan to a large segment of the Company's employees ranging from line management to executives. In 2015 and 2016, stock-based compensation consisted exclusively of performance share units. Beginning in 2017, stock-based compensation granted to employees includes restricted stock units in addition to performance share units. Prior to 2015, stock-based compensation also included stock options. As of December 31, 2017, there were 895 current and former employees participating in the stock option, performance share unit, and restricted stock unit programs.

NOTES (continued)
Georgia Power Company 2017 Annual Report

Performance Share Units
Performance share units granted to employees vest at the end of a three-year performance period. All unvested performance share units vest immediately upon a change in control where Southern Company is not the surviving corporation. Shares of Southern Company common stock are delivered to employees at the end of the performance period with the number of shares issued ranging from 0% to 200% of the target number of performance share units granted, based on achievement of the performance goals established by the Compensation Committee of the Southern Company Board of Directors.
Southern Company issues performance share units with performance goals based on three performance goals to employees. These include performance share units with performance goals based on the total shareholder return (TSR) for Southern Company common stock during the three-year performance period as compared to a group of industry peers, performance share units with performance goals based on Southern Company's cumulative earnings per share (EPS) over the performance period, and performance share units with performance goals based on Southern Company's equity-weighted ROE over the performance period.
In 2015 and 2016, the EPS-based and ROE-based awards each represented 25% of the total target grant date fair value of the performance share unit awards granted. The remaining 50% of the total target grant date fair value consisted of TSR-based awards. Beginning in 2017, the total target grant date fair value of the stock compensation awards granted was comprised 20% each of EPS-based awards and ROE-based awards and 30% each of TSR-based awards and restricted stock units.
The fair value of TSR-based performance share unit awards is determined as of the grant date using a Monte Carlo simulation model to estimate the TSR of Southern Company's common stock among the industry peers over the performance period. The Company recognizes compensation expense on a straight-line basis over the three-year performance period without remeasurement.
The fair values of the EPS-based awards and the ROE-based awards are based on the closing stock price of Southern Company common stock on the date of the grant. Compensation expense for the EPS-based and ROE-based awards is generally recognized ratably over the three-year performance period initially assuming a 100% payout at the end of the performance period. Employees become immediately vested in the TSR-based performance share units, along with the EPS-based and ROE-based awards, upon retirement. As a result, compensation expense for employees that are retirement eligible at the grant date is recognized immediately while compensation expense for employees that become retirement eligible during the vesting period is recognized over the period from grant date to the date of retirement eligibility. The expected payout related to the EPS-based and ROE-based awards is reevaluated annually with expense recognized to date increased or decreased based on the number of shares currently expected to be issued. Unlike the TSR-based awards, the compensation expense ultimately recognized for the EPS-based awards and the ROE-based awards will be based on the actual number of shares issued at the end of the performance period.
For the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016, and 2015, employees of the Company were granted performance share units of 138,102, 261,434, and 236,804, respectively. The weighted average grant-date fair value of TSR-based performance share units granted during 2017, 2016, and 2015, determined using a Monte Carlo simulation model to estimate the TSR of Southern Company's stock among the industry peers over the performance period, was $49.27, $45.17, and $46.41, respectively. The weighted average grant-date fair value of both EPS-based and ROE-based performance share units granted during 2017, 2016, and 2015 was $49.22, $48.84, and $47.78, respectively.
For the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016, and 2015, total compensation cost for performance share units recognized in income was $10 million, $15 million, and $15 million, respectively, with the related tax benefit also recognized in income of $4 million, $6 million, and $6 million, respectively. The compensation cost related to the grant of Southern Company performance share units to the Company's employees is recognized in the Company's financial statements with a corresponding credit to equity, representing a capital contribution from Southern Company. As of December 31, 2017, $3 million of total unrecognized compensation cost related to performance share award units will be recognized over a weighted-average period of approximately 21 months.
Restricted Stock Units
Beginning in 2017, stock-based compensation granted to employees included restricted stock units in addition to performance share units. One-third of the restricted stock units granted to employees vest each year throughout a three-year service period. All unvested restricted stock units vest immediately upon a change in control where Southern Company is not the surviving corporation. Shares of Southern Company common stock are delivered to employees at the end of the vesting period.
The fair value of restricted stock units is based on the closing stock price of Southern Company common stock on the date of the grant. Since one-third of the restricted stock units vest each year throughout a three-year service period, compensation expense for restricted stock unit awards is generally recognized over the corresponding one-, two-, or three-year period. Employees

NOTES (continued)
Georgia Power Company 2017 Annual Report

become immediately vested in the restricted stock units upon retirement. As a result, compensation expense for employees that are retirement eligible at the grant date is recognized immediately while compensation expense for employees that become retirement eligible during the vesting period is recognized over the period from grant date to the date of retirement eligibility.
For the year ended December 31, 2017, employees of the Company were granted 59,218 restricted stock units. The weighted average grant-date fair value of restricted stock units granted during 2017 was $49.22.
For the year ended December 31, 2017, total compensation cost for restricted stock units recognized in income was $3 million with the related tax benefit also recognized in income of $1 million. As of December 31, 2017, $1 million of total unrecognized compensation cost related to restricted stock units will be recognized over a weighted-average period of approximately 13 months.
Stock Options
In 2015, Southern Company discontinued the granting of stock options. Stock options expire no later than 10 years after the grant date and the latest possible exercise will occur no later than November 2024.
The compensation cost related to the grant of Southern Company stock options to the Company's employees is recognized in the Company's financial statements with a corresponding credit to equity, representing a capital contribution from Southern Company. Compensation cost and related tax benefits recognized in the Company's financial statements were not material for any year presented. As of December 31, 2017, all compensation cost related to stock option awards has been recognized.
The total intrinsic value of options exercised during the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016, and 2015 was $13 million, $18 million, and $9 million, respectively. No cash proceeds are received by the Company upon the exercise of stock options. The actual tax benefit realized by the Company for the tax deductions from stock option exercises totaled $5 million, $7 million, and $4 million for the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016, and 2015, respectively. Prior to the adoption of ASU 2016-09 in 2016, the excess tax benefits related to the exercise of stock options were recognized in the Company's financial statements with a credit to equity. Upon the adoption of ASU 2016-09, beginning in 2016, all tax benefits related to the exercise of stock options are recognized in income. As of December 31, 2017, the aggregate intrinsic value for the options outstanding and exercisable was $30 million.
9. NUCLEAR INSURANCE
Under the Price-Anderson Amendments Act (Act), the Company maintains agreements of indemnity with the NRC that, together with private insurance, cover third-party liability arising from any nuclear incident occurring at Plant Hatch and Plant Vogtle Units 1 and 2. The Act provides funds up to $13.4 billion for public liability claims that could arise from a single nuclear incident. Each nuclear plant is insured against this liability to a maximum of $450 million by American Nuclear Insurers (ANI), with the remaining coverage provided by a mandatory program of deferred premiums that could be assessed, after a nuclear incident, against all owners of commercial nuclear reactors. The Company could be assessed up to $127 million per incident for each licensed reactor it operates but not more than an aggregate of $19 million per incident to be paid in a calendar year for each reactor. Such maximum assessment, excluding any applicable state premium taxes, for the Company, based on its ownership and buyback interests in all licensed reactors, is $247 million per incident, but not more than an aggregate of $37 million to be paid for each incident in any one year. Both the maximum assessment per reactor and the maximum yearly assessment are adjusted for inflation at least every five years. The next scheduled adjustment is due no later than September 10, 2018. See Note 4 for additional information on joint ownership agreements.
The Company is a member of Nuclear Electric Insurance Limited (NEIL), a mutual insurer established to provide property damage insurance in an amount up to $1.5 billion for members' operating nuclear generating facilities. Additionally, the Company has NEIL policies that currently provide decontamination, excess property insurance, and premature decommissioning coverage up to $1.25 billion for nuclear losses and policies providing coverage up to $750 million for non-nuclear losses in excess of the $1.5 billion primary coverage.
NEIL also covers the additional costs that would be incurred in obtaining replacement power during a prolonged accidental outage at a member's nuclear plant. Members can purchase this coverage, subject to a deductible waiting period of up to 26 weeks, with a maximum per occurrence per unit limit of $490 million. After the deductible period, weekly indemnity payments would be received until either the unit is operational or until the limit is exhausted. The Company purchases limits based on the projected full cost of replacement power, subject to ownership limitations, and has elected a 12-week deductible waiting period for each facility.
A builders' risk property insurance policy has been purchased from NEIL for the construction of Plant Vogtle Units 3 and 4. This policy provides the Vogtle Owners up to $2.75 billion for accidental property damage occurring during construction.

NOTES (continued)
Georgia Power Company 2017 Annual Report

Under each of the NEIL policies, members are subject to assessments each year if losses exceed the accumulated funds available to the insurer. The maximum annual assessments for the Company as of December 31, 2017 under the NEIL policies would be $81 million.
Claims resulting from terrorist acts are covered under both the ANI and NEIL policies (subject to normal policy limits). The aggregate, however, that NEIL will pay for all claims resulting from terrorist acts in any 12-month period is $3.2 billion plus such additional amounts NEIL can recover through reinsurance, indemnity, or other sources.
For all on-site property damage insurance policies for commercial nuclear power plants, the NRC requires that the proceeds of such policies shall be dedicated first for the sole purpose of placing the reactor in a safe and stable condition after an accident. Any remaining proceeds are to be applied next toward the costs of decontamination and debris removal operations ordered by the NRC, and any further remaining proceeds are to be paid either to the Company or to its debt trustees as may be appropriate under the policies and applicable trust indentures. In the event of a loss, the amount of insurance available might not be adequate to cover property damage and other expenses incurred. Uninsured losses and other expenses, to the extent not recovered from customers, would be borne by the Company and could have a material effect on the Company's financial condition and results of operations.
All retrospective assessments, whether generated for liability, property, or replacement power, may be subject to applicable state premium taxes.
10. FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTS
Fair value measurements are based on inputs of observable and unobservable market data that a market participant would use in pricing the asset or liability. The use of observable inputs is maximized where available and the use of unobservable inputs is minimized for fair value measurement and reflects a three-tier fair value hierarchy that prioritizes inputs to valuation techniques used for fair value measurement.
Level 1 consists of observable market data in an active market for identical assets or liabilities.
Level 2 consists of observable market data, other than that included in Level 1, that is either directly or indirectly observable.
Level 3 consists of unobservable market data. The input may reflect the assumptions of the Company of what a market participant would use in pricing an asset or liability. If there is little available market data, then the Company's own assumptions are the best available information.
In the case of multiple inputs being used in a fair value measurement, the lowest level input that is significant to the fair value measurement represents the level in the fair value hierarchy in which the fair value measurement is reported.

NOTES (continued)
Georgia Power Company 2017 Annual Report

As of December 31, 2017, assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis during the period, together with their associated level of the fair value hierarchy, were as follows:
 Fair Value Measurements Using  
 Quoted Prices in Active Markets for Identical Assets Significant Other Observable Inputs Significant Unobservable Inputs  
As of December 31, 2017:(Level 1) (Level 2) (Level 3) Total
 (in millions)
Assets:       
Energy-related derivatives$
 $6
 $
 $6
Nuclear decommissioning trusts:(*)
       
Domestic equity248
 1
 
 249
Foreign equity
 166
 
 166
U.S. Treasury and government agency securities
 227
 
 227
Municipal bonds
 68
 
 68
Corporate bonds
 155
 
 155
Mortgage and asset backed securities
 40
 
 40
Other12
 12
 
 24
Cash equivalents690
 
 
 690
Total$950
 $675
 $
 $1,625
Liabilities:       
Energy-related derivatives$
 $19
 $
 $19
Interest rate derivatives
 5
 
 5
Total$
 $24
 $
 $24
(*)Includes the investment securities pledged to creditors and collateral received, and excludes receivables related to investment income, pending investment sales, currencies, and payables related to pending investment purchases and the securities lending program. See Note 1 under "Nuclear Decommissioning" for additional information."Sales of Natural Gas Plants" below.
    Table of Contents                                Index to Financial Statements

NOTESMANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS (continued)
GeorgiaSouthern Power Company 2017and Subsidiary Companies 2018 Annual Report

As of December 31, 2016, assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis during the period, together with their associated level of the fair value hierarchy, were as follows:
 Fair Value Measurements Using  
 Quoted Prices in Active Markets for Identical Assets Significant Other Observable Inputs Significant Unobservable Inputs  
As of December 31, 2016:(Level 1) (Level 2) (Level 3) Total
 (in millions)
Assets:       
Energy-related derivatives$
 $44
 $
 $44
Interest rate derivatives
 2
 
 2
Nuclear decommissioning trusts:(*)
       
Domestic equity204
 1
 
 205
Foreign equity
 121


 121
U.S. Treasury and government agency securities
 71
 
 71
Municipal bonds
 73
 
 73
Corporate bonds
 164
 
 164
Mortgage and asset backed securities
 164
 
 164
Other11
 5
 
 16
Total$215
 $645
 $
 $860
Liabilities:       
Energy-related derivatives$
 $8
 $
 $8
Interest rate derivatives
 3
 
 3
Total$
 $11
 $
 $11
(*)(c)IncludesIn May 2018, Southern Power purchased 100% of the investment securities pledged to creditors and collateral received, and excludes receivables related to investment income, pending investment sales, currencies, and payables related to pending investment purchases andWild Horse Mountain facility. Southern Power may enter into a tax equity partnership, in which case it would then own 100% of the securities lending program. See Note 1 under "Nuclear Decommissioning" for additional information.class B membership interests. The ultimate outcome of this matter cannot be determined at this time.
(d)In August 2018, Southern Power purchased 100% of the membership interests of the Reading facility from the joint development arrangement with Renewable Energy Systems Americas, Inc. described below. Southern Power may enter into a tax equity partnership, in which case it would then own 100% of the class B membership interests. The ultimate outcome of this matter cannot be determined at this time.
Valuation Methodologies
The energy-related derivatives primarily consistTotal aggregate construction costs for projects under construction at December 31, 2018, excluding acquisition costs, are expected to be between $575 million and $640 million for the Plant Mankato expansion, Wild Horse Mountain, and Reading facilities. At December 31, 2018, total costs of over-the-counterconstruction incurred for these projects was $289 million, and is included in CWIP, except for the Plant Mankato expansion, which is included in assets held for sale in the financial products for natural gas and physical power products, including, from time to time, basis swaps. These are standard products used within the energy industry and are valued using the market approach. The inputs used are mainly from observable market sources, such as forward natural gas prices, power prices, implied volatility, and overnight index swap interest rates. Interest rate derivatives are also standard over-the-counter products that are valued using observable market data and assumptions commonly used by market participants. The fair value of interest rate derivatives reflects the net present value of expected payments and receipts under the swap agreement based on the market's expectation of future interest rates. Additional inputsstatements. See Note 15 to the net present value calculation may include the contract terms, counterparty credit risk,financial statements under "Southern Power" and occasionally, implied volatility of interest rate options. The interest rate derivatives are categorized as Level 2 under Fair Value Measurements as these inputs are based on observable data and valuations of similar instruments. See Note 11"Assets Held for Sale" for additional information on how these derivatives are used.information.
The NRC requires licensees of commissioned nuclear power reactorsDevelopment Projects
During 2017, Southern Power purchased wind turbine equipment to establish a planbe used for providing reasonable assurance of funds for future decommissioning. For fair value measurements of the investments within the nuclear decommissioning trusts, external pricing vendors are designated for each asset class with each security specifically assigned a primary pricing source. For investments held within commingled funds, fair value is determined atvarious development and construction projects. Any wind projects using this equipment and reaching commercial operation by the end of each business day through2021 are expected to qualify for 80% PTCs.
During 2016, Southern Power entered into a joint development agreement with Renewable Energy Systems Americas, Inc. (RES) to develop and construct wind projects. Concurrent with the net asset value, which is established by obtaining the underlying securities' individual pricesagreement, Southern Power purchased wind turbine equipment from Siemens Wind Power, Inc. and Vestas-American Wind Technology, Inc. to be used for construction of these projects. Several wind projects using this equipment, as well as other purchased equipment, have successfully originated, directly or indirectly, from the primary pricing source. A market price secured frompartnership with RES and are expected to reach commercial operation before the primary source vendorend of 2020, thus qualifying for 100% PTCs.
Southern Power continues to evaluate and refine the deployment of the wind turbine equipment to potential joint development and construction projects as well as the amount of MW capacity to be constructed. During the third quarter 2018, as a result of a review of various options for probable dispositions of wind turbine equipment not deployed to development or construction projects, Southern Power recorded a $36 million asset impairment charge on the equipment.
Subsequent to December 31, 2018 and as part of management's continuous review of disposition options, approximately $53 million of this equipment is then evaluated by managementbeing marketed for sale and will be classified as held for sale.
The ultimate outcome of these matters cannot be determined at this time.
Sales of Renewable Facility Interests
On May 22, 2018, Southern Power completed the sale of a noncontrolling 33% equity interest in SP Solar, a limited partnership indirectly owning substantially all of Southern Power's solar facilities, to Global Atlantic for approximately $1.2 billion. Since Southern Power retains control of the limited partnership through its wholly-owned general partner, the sale was recorded as an equity transaction and Southern Power will continue to consolidate SP Solar in its valuationfinancial statements. On the date of the assets withintransaction, the trusts. As a general approach, fixed income market pricing vendors gather market data (including indices and market research reports) and integrate relative credit information, observed market movements, and sector news into proprietary pricing models, pricing systems, and mathematical tools. Dealer quotesnoncontrolling interest was increased by $511 million to reflect 33% of the carrying value of the partnership. This difference, partially offset by the tax impact and other market information,related transaction charges, also resulted in a $410 million decrease to Southern Power's common stockholder's equity.
On December 11, 2018, Southern Power completed the sale of a noncontrolling tax equity interest in SP Wind, which owns a portfolio of eight operating wind facilities, to three financial investors for approximately $1.2 billion. The tax equity investors together will generally receive 40% of the cash distributions from available cash and will receive 99% of the tax attributes, including live trading levelsfuture production tax credits. Since Southern Power retains control of SP Wind, Southern Power will continue to consolidate SP Wind in its financial statements.
Sales of Natural Gas Plants
On December 4, 2018, Southern Power completed the sale of all of its equity interests in the Florida Plants to NextEra Energy for $203 million. In contemplation of this sale transaction, Southern Power recorded an asset impairment charge of approximately $119 million ($89 million after tax) in May 2018. Pre-tax net income for the Florida Plants was $49 million and pricing analysts' judgments, are also obtained when available. See Note$37 million for the period from January 1, 2018 to December 4, 2018 and for the year ended December 31, 2017, respectively.
On November 5, 2018, Southern Power entered into an agreement with Northern States Power to sell all of its equity interests in Plant Mankato (including the 385-MW expansion currently under "Nuclear Decommissioning"construction) for additional information.an aggregate purchase price of approximately $650 million. The completion of the disposition is subject to the expansion unit reaching commercial operation as well as various other customary conditions to closing, including working capital and timing adjustments. The ultimate purchase price will decrease $66,667 per day for each day after June 1, 2019 that the expansion has not achieved commercial operation, not to exceed $15 million. Pre-tax net income for Plant Mankato was immaterial for the years ended December 31, 2018 and 2017. This
    Table of Contents                                Index to Financial Statements

NOTESMANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS (continued)
GeorgiaSouthern Power Company 2017and Subsidiary Companies 2018 Annual Report

Astransaction is subject to FERC and state commission approvals and is expected to close mid-2019. The assets and liabilities of Plant Mankato are classified as held for sale as of December 31, 20172018.
See Note 15 to the financial statements under "Southern Power" and "Assets Held for Sale" for additional information. The ultimate outcome of this matter cannot be determined at this time.
Other Matters
Southern Power is involved in various other matters being litigated and regulatory matters that could affect future earnings. In addition, Southern Power is subject to certain claims and legal actions arising in the ordinary course of business. Southern Power's business activities are subject to extensive governmental regulation related to public health and the environment, such as laws and regulations governing air, water, land, and protection of other natural resources. Litigation over environmental issues and claims of various types, including property damage, personal injury, common law nuisance, and citizen enforcement of environmental laws and regulations, has occurred throughout the U.S. This litigation has included claims for damages alleged to have been caused by CO2 and other emissions and alleged exposure to hazardous materials, and/or requests for injunctive relief in connection with such matters.
The ultimate outcome of such pending or potential litigation or regulatory matters cannot be predicted at this time; however, for current proceedings not specifically reported in Note 3 to the financial statements herein, management does not anticipate that the ultimate liabilities, if any, arising from such current proceedings would have a material effect on Southern Power's financial statements.
Southern Power indirectly owns a 51% membership interest in RE Roserock LLC (Roserock), the owner of the Roserock facility in Pecos County, Texas. Prior to the facility being placed in service in 2016, certain solar panels were damaged during installation by the construction contractor, McCarthy Building Companies, Inc. (McCarthy), and certain solar panels were damaged by a hail event that also occurred during construction. In connection therewith, Southern Power is withholding payments of approximately $26 million from the construction contractor, which has placed a lien on the Roserock facility for the same amount. In May 2017, Roserock filed a lawsuit in the state district court in Pecos County, Texas, (State Court lawsuit) against XL Insurance America, Inc. (XL) and North American Elite Insurance Company (North American Elite) seeking recovery from an insurance policy for damages resulting from the hail storm and McCarthy's installation practices. On June 1, 2018, the court in the State Court lawsuit granted Roserock's motion for partial summary judgment, finding that the insurers were in breach of contract and in violation of the Texas Insurance Code for failing to pay any monies owed for the hail claim. In addition to the State Court lawsuit, lawsuits were filed between Roserock and McCarthy, as well as other parties, and that litigation has been consolidated in the U.S. District Court for the Western District of Texas. Southern Power intends to vigorously pursue and defend these matters, the ultimate outcome of which cannot be determined at this time.
ACCOUNTING POLICIES
Application of Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates
Southern Power prepares its consolidated financial statements in accordance with GAAP. Significant accounting policies are described in Notes 1, 4, and 10 to the financial statements. In the application of these policies, certain estimates are made that may have a material impact on Southern Power's results of operations and related disclosures. Different assumptions and measurements could produce estimates that are significantly different from those recorded in the financial statements. Senior management has reviewed and discussed the following critical accounting policies and estimates with the Audit Committee of Southern Company's Board of Directors.
Revenue Recognition
Southern Power's revenue recognition depends on appropriate classification and documentation of transactions in accordance with GAAP. In general, Southern Power's power sale transactions, which include PPAs, can be classified in one of four categories: leases, non-derivatives or normal sale derivatives, derivatives designated as cash flow hedges, and derivatives not designated as hedges. For more information on derivative transactions, see FINANCIAL CONDITION AND LIQUIDITY – "Market Price Risk" herein and Notes 1 and 14 to the financial statements. Southern Power's revenues are dependent upon significant judgments used to determine the appropriate transaction classification, which must be documented upon the inception of each contract.
Lease Transactions
Southern Power considers the following factors to determine whether the sales contract is a lease:
Assessing whether specific property is explicitly or implicitly identified in the agreement;

MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS (continued)
Southern Power Company and Subsidiary Companies 2018 Annual Report

Determining whether the fulfillment of the arrangement is dependent on the use of the identified property; and
Assessing whether the arrangement conveys to the purchaser the right to use the identified property.
If the contract meets the above criteria for a lease, Southern Power performs further analysis as to whether the lease is classified as operating, financing, or sales-type. All of Southern Power's power sales contracts that are determined to be leases are accounted for as operating leases and the capacity revenue is recognized on a straight-line basis over the term of the contract and is included in Southern Power's operating revenues. Energy revenues and other contingent revenues are recognized in the period the energy is delivered or the service is rendered.
Non-Derivative and Normal Sale Derivative Transactions
If the power sales contract is not classified as a lease, Southern Power further considers the following factors to determine proper classification:
Assessing whether the contract meets the definition of a derivative;
Assessing whether the contract meets the definition of a capacity contract;
Assessing the probability at inception and throughout the term of the individual contract that the contract will result in physical delivery; and
Ensuring that the contract quantities do not exceed available generating capacity (including purchased capacity).
Contracts that do not meet the definition of a derivative or are designated as normal sales (i.e. capacity contracts which provide for the sale of electricity that involve physical delivery in quantities within Southern Power's available generating capacity) are accounted for as executory contracts. For contracts that have a capacity charge, the revenue is generally recognized in the period that it becomes billable. Revenues related to energy and ancillary services are recognized in the period the energy is delivered or the service is rendered. See Note 4 to the financial statements for additional information.
Cash Flow Hedge Transactions
Southern Power further considers the following in designating other derivative contracts for the sale of electricity as cash flow hedges of anticipated sale transactions:
Identifying the hedging instrument, the forecasted hedged transaction, and the nature of the risk being hedged; and
Assessing hedge effectiveness at inception and throughout the contract term.
These contracts are accounted for on a fair value basis and are recorded in AOCI over the life of the contract. Realized gains and losses are then recognized in operating revenues as incurred.
Derivative (Non-Hedge) Transactions
Contracts for sales of electricity, which meet the definition of a derivative and that either do not qualify or are not designated as normal sales or as cash flow hedges, are accounted for on a fair value basis and are recorded in operating revenues.
Impairment of Long-Lived Assets and Intangibles
Southern Power's investments in long-lived assets are primarily generation assets, whether in service or under construction. Southern Power's intangible assets arise from certain acquisitions and consist of acquired PPAs, which are amortized to revenue over the term of the respective PPAs. Southern Power evaluates the carrying value of these assets whenever indicators of potential impairment exist. Examples of impairment indicators could include significant changes in construction schedules, current period losses combined with a history of losses or a projection of continuing losses, a significant decrease in market prices, the inability to remarket generating capacity for an extended period, the unplanned termination of a customer contract or inability of a customer to perform under the terms of the contract, or the inability to deploy wind turbine equipment to a development project. If an indicator exists, the asset is tested for recoverability by comparing the asset carrying value to the sum of the undiscounted expected future cash flows directly attributable to the asset. If the estimate of undiscounted future cash flows is less than the carrying value of the asset, the fair value of the asset is determined and a loss is recorded. A high degree of judgment is required in developing estimates related to these evaluations, which are based on projections of various factors, including the following:
Future demand for electricity based on projections of economic growth and estimates of available generating capacity;
Future power and natural gas prices, which have been quite volatile in recent years; and
Future operating costs.

MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS (continued)
Southern Power Company and Subsidiary Companies 2018 Annual Report

In addition, when assets are identified as held for sale, an impairment loss is recognized to the extent that the carrying value of the assets or asset group exceeds the asset fair value less cost to sell. In 2018, an impairment charge of $119 million was recorded for the Florida Plants concurrent with the assets being identified as held for sale as a result of a signed purchase and sale agreement. Also in 2018, an impairment charge of $36 million was recorded for wind turbine equipment that is no longer likely to be deployed to a wind generation project.
Acquisition Accounting
Southern Power may acquire generation assets as part of its overall growth strategy. At the time of an acquisition, Southern Power will assess if these assets and activities meet the definition of a business. For acquisitions that meet the definition of a business, Southern Power includes operating results from the date of acquisition in its consolidated financial statements. The purchase price, including any contingent consideration, is allocated based on the fair value of the identifiable assets acquired and liabilities assumed (including any intangible assets). Assets acquired that do not meet the definition of a business are accounted for as an asset acquisition.
The purchase price of each asset acquisition is allocated based on the relative fair value of assets acquired. Determining the fair value of assets acquired and liabilities assumed requires management judgment and Southern Power may engage independent valuation experts to assist in this process. Fair values are determined by using market participant assumptions, and typically include the timing and amounts of future cash flows, incurred construction costs, the nature of acquired contracts, discount rates, power market prices, and expected asset lives. Any due diligence or transition costs incurred by Southern Power for potential or successful acquisitions are expensed as incurred.
Contingent consideration primarily relates to fixed amounts due to the seller once the facility is placed in service. For contingent consideration with variable payments, Southern Power fair values the arrangement with any changes recorded in the consolidated statements of income. See Note 13 to the financial statements for additional fair value information and Note 15 to the financial statements for additional information on recent acquisitions.
Accounting for Income Taxes
The consolidated income tax provision and deferred income tax assets and liabilities, as well as any unrecognized tax benefits and valuation allowances, require significant judgment and estimates. These estimates are supported by historical tax return data, reasonable projections of taxable income, and interpretations of applicable tax laws and regulations across multiple taxing jurisdictions. The effective tax rate reflects the statutory tax rates and calculated apportionments for the various states in which Southern Power operates.
On behalf of Southern Power, Southern Company files a consolidated federal income tax return and various state income tax returns, some of which are combined or unitary. Under a joint consolidated income tax allocation agreement, each Southern Company subsidiary's current and deferred tax expense is computed on a stand-alone basis and no subsidiary is allocated more current expense than would be paid if it filed a separate income tax return. Certain deductions and credits can be limited at the consolidated or combined level resulting in NOL and tax credit carryforwards that would not otherwise result on a stand-alone basis. Utilization of NOL and tax credit carryforwards and the assessment of valuation allowances are based on significant judgment and extensive analysis of Southern Power's, as well as Southern Company's, current financial position and results of operations, including currently available information about future years, to estimate when future taxable income will be realized.
Current and deferred state income tax liabilities and assets are estimated based on laws of multiple states that determine the income to be apportioned to their jurisdictions. States utilize various formulas to calculate the apportionment of taxable income, primarily using sales, assets, or payroll within the jurisdiction compared to the consolidated totals. In addition, each state varies as to whether a stand-alone, combined, or unitary filing methodology is required. The calculation of deferred state taxes considers apportionment factors and filing methodologies that are expected to apply in future years. The apportionments and methodologies which are ultimately finalized in a manner inconsistent with expectations could have a material effect on Southern Power's financial statements.
Given the significant judgment involved in estimating NOL and tax credit carryforwards and multi-state apportionments for all subsidiaries, Southern Power considers federal and state deferred income tax liabilities and assets to be critical accounting estimates.
Recently Issued Accounting Standards
See Note 1 to the financial statements under "Recently Adopted Accounting Standards" for additional information.
In 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-02, Leases (Topic 842) (ASU 2016-02). ASU 2016-02 requires lessees to recognize on the balance sheet a lease liability and a right-of-use asset for all leases. ASU 2016-02 also changes the recognition, measurement,

MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS (continued)
Southern Power Company and Subsidiary Companies 2018 Annual Report

and presentation of expense associated with leases and provides clarification regarding the identification of certain components of contracts that would represent a lease. The accounting required by lessors is relatively unchanged. ASU 2016-02 is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2018 and Southern Power adopted the new standard effective January 1, 2019.
Southern Power elected the transition methodology provided by ASU No. 2018-11, Leases (Topic 842): Targeted Improvements, whereby the requirements of ASU 2016-02 are applied on a prospective basis as of the adoption date of January 1, 2019, without restating prior periods. Southern Power elected the package of practical expedients provided by ASU 2016-02 that allows prior determinations of whether existing contracts are, or contain, leases and the classification of existing leases to continue without reassessment. Additionally, Southern Power expects to apply the use-of-hindsight practical expedient in determining lease terms as of the date of adoption. Southern Power also made accounting policy elections to account for short-term leases in all asset classes as off-balance sheet leases and combined lessee lease and non-lease components in the computations of lease obligations and right-of-use assets for most asset classes, while lessor lease and non-lease components are accounted for separately.
Southern Power completed the implementation of a new application to track and account for its leases and updated its internal controls and accounting policies to support the accounting for leases under ASU 2016-02. Southern Power completed its lease inventory and determined its most significant leases as a lessee involve real estate. In the first quarter 2019, the adoption of ASU 2016-02 resulted in recording lease liabilities and right-of-use assets on Southern Power's balance sheet each totaling approximately $0.4 billion, with no impact on Southern Power's statement of income.
FINANCIAL CONDITION AND LIQUIDITY
Overview
Southern Power's financial condition remained stable at December 31, 2018. Southern Power's cash requirements primarily consist of funding ongoing business operations, common stock dividends, distributions to noncontrolling interests, capital expenditures, and debt maturities. Capital expenditures and other investing activities may include investments in acquisitions or new construction associated with Southern Power's overall growth strategy and to maintain the existing generation fleet's performance. Operating cash flows, which may include the utilization of tax credits, will only provide a portion of Southern Power's cash needs. For the three-year period from 2019 through 2021, Southern Power's projected common stock dividends, distributions to noncontrolling interests, capital expenditures, and debt maturities are expected to exceed operating cash flows. Southern Power plans to finance future cash needs in excess of its operating cash flows primarily through external securities issuances, borrowings from financial instrumentsinstitutions, and equity contributions from Southern Company. Southern Power intends to continue to monitor its access to short-term and long-term capital markets as well as its bank credit agreements to meet future capital and liquidity needs. See "Sources of Capital," "Financing Activities," and "Contractual Obligations" herein for additional information on lines of credit.
Southern Power also utilizes tax equity partnerships, as one of its financing sources, where the tax partner takes significantly all of the federal tax benefits. These tax equity partnerships are consolidated in Southern Power's financial statements and are accounted for using a HLBV methodology to allocate partnership gains and losses. During 2018, Southern Power obtained tax equity funding for the Gaskell West 1 solar project, the Cactus Flats wind project, and the SP Wind portfolio and received proceeds of approximately $26 million, $122 million, and $1.2 billion, respectively.
On May 22, 2018, Southern Power completed the sale of a noncontrolling 33% equity interest in SP Solar, a limited partnership indirectly owning substantially all of Southern Power's solar facilities, to Global Atlantic for approximately $1.2 billion. Accordingly, Global Atlantic will receive 33% of all cash distributions paid by SP Solar.
On December 4, 2018, Southern Power completed the sale of all of its equity interests in the Florida Plants to NextEra Energy for $203 million. On November 5, 2018, Southern Power entered into an agreement with Northern States Power to sell all of its equity interests in Plant Mankato (including the 385-MW expansion currently under construction) for an aggregate purchase price of approximately $650 million. The completion of the disposition is subject to the expansion unit reaching commercial operation as well as various other customary conditions to closing, and is expected to close mid-2019. The ultimate outcome of this matter cannot be determined at this time.
Net cash provided from operating activities totaled $631 million in 2018, a decrease of $524 million compared to 2017. The decrease was primarily due to lower income tax refunds as a result of taxable gains arising from the sales of noncontrolling interests in SP Solar and SP Wind, as well as the sale of the Florida Plants.At December 31, 2018, Southern Power had $2.1 billion of unutilized ITCs and PTCs which are expected to be fully utilized by 2022. See FUTURE EARNINGS POTENTIAL – "Income Tax Matters – Tax Credits" herein for additional information. Net cash provided from operating activities totaled $1.2 billion in 2017, an increase of $816 million compared to 2016 primarily due to income tax refunds received and an increase in energy sales from new solar and wind facilities, partially offset by an increase in interest paid.

MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS (continued)
Southern Power Company and Subsidiary Companies 2018 Annual Report

Net cash used for investing activities totaled $227 million, $1.6 billion, and $4.8 billion in 2018, 2017, and 2016, respectively, and decreased in 2018 primarily due to fewer acquisitions and completion of construction of renewable facilities during 2017 and 2018. See FUTURE EARNINGS POTENTIAL – "Acquisitions" and "Construction Projects" herein and Note 15 to the carryingfinancial statements for additional information.
Net cash used for financing activities totaled $363 million in 2018 primarily due to returns of capital to Southern Company, payments of common stock dividends, and distributions to noncontrolling interests, partially offset by capital contributions from noncontrolling interests. Net cash used for financing activities totaled $502 million in 2017 primarily due to payments of common stock dividends and distributions to noncontrolling interests. Net cash provided from financing activities totaled $4.7 billion in 2016 primarily due to the issuance of additional senior notes and capital contributions from Southern Company and noncontrolling interests.
Significant balance sheet changes include a $745 million decrease in plant in service and a $576 million increase in assets held for sale primarily due to completed and planned plant divestitures and a $355 million increase in deferred income taxes primarily due to $551 million related to the sales of noncontrolling interests in SP Solar and SP Wind and $129 million in additional unutilized PTCs, partially offset by a $333 million decrease in the federal NOL carryforward.
Sources of Capital
Southern Power plans to obtain the funds required for acquisitions, construction, development, debt maturities, and other purposes from operating cash flows, external securities issuances, borrowings from financial institutions, tax equity partnership contributions, divestitures, and equity contributions from Southern Company. However, the amount, didtype, and timing of any future financings, if needed, will depend upon prevailing market conditions, regulatory approval, and other factors. With respect to the public offering of securities, Southern Power (excluding its subsidiaries) issues and offers debt registered on registration statements filed with the SEC under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended.
Southern Power's current liabilities sometimes exceed current assets due to the use of short-term debt as a funding source and construction payables, as well as fluctuations in cash needs due to seasonality. Southern Power believes the need for working capital can be adequately met by utilizing the commercial paper program, the Facility (as defined below), borrowings from financial institutions, equity contributions from Southern Company, external securities issuances, and operating cash flows.
Southern Power obtains its own financing separately without any credit support from Southern Company or any other affiliate. The Southern Company system does not equal fair valuemaintain a centralized cash or money pool. Therefore, funds of Southern Power are not commingled with funds of any other company in the Southern Company system. To meet liquidity and capital resource requirements, Southern Power had cash and cash equivalents of approximately $181 million at December 31, 2018.
Southern Power's commercial paper program is used to finance acquisition and construction costs related to electric generating facilities and for general corporate purposes, including maturing debt. Southern Power's subsidiaries are not issuers under the commercial paper program. Short-term borrowings are included in notes payable on the consolidated balance sheets.

MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS (continued)
Southern Power Company and Subsidiary Companies 2018 Annual Report

Details of short-term borrowings were as follows:
 
Carrying
Amount
 
Fair
Value
 (in millions)
Long-term debt, including securities due within one year:   
2017$11,777
 $12,531
2016$10,516
 $11,034
 
Short-term Borrowings at the
End of the Period
 
Short-term Borrowings During the Period (*)
 Amount Outstanding Weighted Average Interest Rate Average Amount Outstanding Weighted Average Interest Rate Maximum Amount Outstanding
 (in millions)   (in millions)   (in millions)
December 31, 2018         
Commercial paper$
 —% $77
 2.2% $304
Short-term bank debt100
 3.1% 111
 2.7% 200
Total$100
 3.1% $188
 2.5%  
December 31, 2017         
Commercial paper$105
 2.0% $215
 1.4% $419
Short-term bank debt
 —% 17
 2.1% 209
Total$105
 2.0% $232
 1.4%  
December 31, 2016         
Commercial paper$
 —% $56
 0.8% $310
Total$
 —% $56
 0.8%  
(*)Average and maximum amounts are based upon daily balances during the twelve-month periods ended December 31, 2018, 2017, and 2016.
In addition to the short-term borrowings of Southern Power included in the table above, at December 31, 2016, Southern Power subsidiaries assumed credit agreements (Project Credit Facilities) with the acquisition of certain solar facilities, which were non-recourse to the Southern Power parent company, the proceeds of which were used to finance project costs related to such solar facilities. The Project Credit Facilities were fully repaid in January 2017. For the year ended December 31, 2016, the Project Credit Facilities had a maximum amount outstanding of $828 million and an average amount outstanding of $566 million at a weighted average interest rate of 2.1% and had total amounts outstanding of $209 million at a weighted average interest rate of 2.1% at December 31, 2016.
Company Credit Facilities
At December 31, 2018, Southern Power had a committed credit facility (Facility) of $750 million expiring in 2022, of which $23 million has been used for letters of credit and $727 million remains unused. Southern Power's subsidiaries are not borrowers under the Facility. Proceeds from the Facility may be used for working capital and general corporate purposes as well as liquidity support for Southern Power's commercial paper program. A portion of the unused credit under the Facility is allocated to provide liquidity support for Southern Power's commercial paper program. Subject to applicable market conditions, Southern Power expects to renew or replace the Facility, as needed, prior to expiration. In connection therewith, Southern Power may extend the maturity date and/or increase or decrease the lending commitment thereunder. See Note 8 to the financial statements under "Bank Credit Arrangements" for additional information.
The fair valuesFacility, as well as Southern Power's term loan agreements, contains a covenant that limits the ratio of debt to capitalization (as defined in the Facility) to a maximum of 65% and contains a cross-default provision that is restricted only to indebtedness of Southern Power. For the purposes of this definition, debt would exclude any project debt incurred by certain subsidiaries of Southern Power to the extent such debt is non-recourse to Southern Power, and capitalization would exclude the capital stock or other equity attributable to such subsidiary. Southern Power is currently in compliance with all of these covenants.
Southern Power also has a $120 million continuing letter of credit facility for standby letters of credit. In December 2018, Southern Power amended the letter of credit facility, which, among other things, extended the expiration date from 2019 to 2021. At December 31, 2018, $103 million has been used for letters of credit, primarily as credit support for PPA requirements, and $17 million was unused. Southern Power's subsidiaries are determined using Level 2 measurementsnot parties to this letter of credit facility.
In addition, at December 31, 2018 and are2017, Southern Power had $103 million and $113 million, respectively, of cash collateral posted related to PPA requirements.

MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS (continued)
Southern Power Company and Subsidiary Companies 2018 Annual Report

Financing Activities
Senior Notes
In June 2018, Southern Power repaid $350 million aggregate principal amount of Series 2015A 1.50% Senior Notes due June 1, 2018.
In addition to any financings that may be necessary to meet capital requirements and contractual obligations, Southern Power plans to continue, when economically feasible, a program to retire higher-cost securities and replace these obligations with lower-cost capital if market conditions permit.
Other Debt
In May 2018, Southern Power repaid $420 million aggregate principal amount of long-term floating rate bank loans.
Also in May 2018, Southern Power entered into two short-term floating rate bank loans, each for an aggregate principal amount of $100 million, which bear interest based on quoted market pricesone-month LIBOR, and proceeds being used for the same or similar issues or on current rates available to the Company.general corporate purposes. In November 2018, Southern Power repaid one of these short-term loans.
11. DERIVATIVESCredit Rating Risk
Southern Power does not have any credit arrangements that would require material changes in payment schedules or terminations as a result of a credit rating downgrade.
There are certain contracts that could require collateral, but not accelerated payment, in the event of a credit rating change to BBB and/or Baa2 or below. These contracts are for physical electricity purchases and sales, fuel transportation and storage, energy price risk management, and transmission.
The maximum potential collateral requirements under these contracts at December 31, 2018 were as follows:
Credit RatingsMaximum Potential Collateral Requirements
 (in millions)
At BBB and/or Baa2$29
At BBB- and/or Baa3$338
At BB+ and/or Ba1 (*)
$980
(*)
Any additional credit rating downgrades at or below BB- and/or Ba3 could increase collateral requirements up to an additional $38 million.
Included in these amounts are certain agreements that could require collateral in the event that either Alabama Power or Georgia Power (affiliate companies of Southern Power) has a credit rating change to below investment grade. Generally, collateral may be provided by a Southern Company guaranty, letter of credit, or cash. Additionally, a credit rating downgrade could impact the ability of Southern Power to access capital markets and would be likely to impact the cost at which it does so.
In addition, Southern Power has a PPA that could require collateral, but not accelerated payment, in the event of a downgrade of Southern Power's credit. The PPA requires credit assurances without stating a specific credit rating. The amount of collateral required would depend upon actual losses resulting from a credit downgrade.
On September 28, 2018, Fitch assigned a negative rating outlook to the ratings of Southern Company and certain of its subsidiaries (including Southern Power).
Market Price Risk
Southern Power is exposed to market risks, primarily commodity price risk, interest rate risk, and interestoccasionally foreign currency exchange rate risk. To manage the volatility attributable to these exposures, the CompanySouthern Power nets its exposures, where possible, to take advantage of natural offsets and enters into various derivative transactions for the remaining exposures pursuant to the Company'sSouthern Power's policies in areas such as counterparty exposure and risk management practices. The Company'sSouthern Power's policy is that derivatives are to be used primarily for hedging purposes and mandates strict adherence to all applicable risk management policies. Derivative positions are monitored using techniques including, but not limited to, market valuation, value at risk, stress testing, and sensitivity analysis. Derivative instruments are recognized at fair value in the consolidated balance sheets as either assets or liabilities and are presented on a netgross basis. See Note 10 for additional information. In the statements of cash flows, the cash impacts of settled energy-related and interest rate derivatives are recorded as operating activities.
Energy-Related Derivatives
The
MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS (continued)
Southern Power Company enters into energy-related derivativesand Subsidiary Companies 2018 Annual Report

At December 31, 2018, Southern Power had $525 million of long-term variable rate notes outstanding. If Southern Power sustained a 100 basis point change in interest rates for its variable interest rate exposure, the change would affect annualized interest expense by approximately $5 million at December 31, 2018. Since a significant portion of outstanding indebtedness bears interest at fixed rates, Southern Power is not aware of any facts or circumstances that would significantly affect exposure on existing indebtedness in the near term. However, the impact on future financing costs cannot be determined at this time.
Southern Power had foreign currency denominated debt of €1.1 billion at December 31, 2018. Southern Power has mitigated its exposure to hedge exposuresforeign currency exchange rate risk through the use of foreign currency swaps converting all interest and principal payments to fixed-rate U.S. dollars.
Because energy from Southern Power's facilities is primarily sold under long-term PPAs with tolling agreements and provisions shifting substantially all of the responsibility for fuel cost to the counterparties, Southern Power's exposure to market volatility in commodity fuel prices and prices of electricity gas,is generally limited. However, Southern Power has been and other fuel price changes. However, duemay continue to cost-based rate regulations and other various cost recovery mechanisms, the Company has limited exposurebe exposed to market volatility in energy-related commodity prices. The Company managesprices as a fuel-hedging program throughresult of uncontracted generating capacity.
For the useyears ended December 31, 2018 and 2017, the changes in fair value of financialenergy-related derivative contracts associated with both power and natural gas positions were as follows:
 20182017
 (in millions)
Contracts outstanding at the beginning of period, assets (liabilities), net$(10)$16
Contracts realized or settled10
(17)
Current period changes (*)
(4)(9)
Contracts outstanding at the end of period, assets (liabilities), net$(4)$(10)
(*)Current period changes also include changes in the fair value of new contracts entered into during the period, if any.
For the years ending December 31, 2018 and 2017, the changes in contracts outstanding were attributable to both the volume and the prices of power and natural gas as follows:
 20182017
Power – net sold  
MWH (in millions)2.5
3.0
Weighted average contract cost per MWH above (below) market prices (in dollars)$(0.23)$(2.67)
Natural Gas – net purchased  
Commodity - mmBtu (in millions)15.0
14.4
Commodity - weighted average contract cost per mmBtu above (below) market prices (in dollars)$0.22
$0.12
Gains and losses on energy-related derivatives designated as cash flow hedges which are used by Southern Power to hedge anticipated purchases and sales are initially deferred in OCI before being recognized in income in the same period as the hedged transactions are reflected in earnings. Gains and losses on energy-related derivative contracts that are not designated or fail to qualify as hedges are recognized in the consolidated statements of income as incurred.
Southern Power uses over-the-counter contracts that are not exchange traded but are fair valued using prices which are market observable, and thus fall into Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy. See Note 13 to the financial statements for further discussion of fair value measurements. The energy-related derivative contracts outstanding at December 31, 2018 mature through 2020.
Southern Power is exposed to losses related to financial instruments in the event of counterparties' nonperformance. Southern Power only enters into agreements and material transactions with counterparties that have investment grade credit ratings by S&P and Moody's or with counterparties who have posted collateral to cover potential credit exposure. Southern Power has also established risk management policies and controls to determine and monitor the creditworthiness of counterparties in order to mitigate Southern Power's exposure to counterparty credit risk. Therefore, Southern Power does not anticipate a material adverse effect on the financial statements as a result of counterparty nonperformance. See Note 1 to the financial statements under "Financial Instruments" and Note 14 to the financial statements for additional information.
Capital Requirements and Contractual Obligations
The capital program of Southern Power is subject to periodic review and revision and is currently estimated to total $0.9 billion over the next five years through 2023. This includes committed construction, capital improvements, and work to be performed

MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS (continued)
Southern Power Company and Subsidiary Companies 2018 Annual Report

under LTSAs, totaling approximately $300 million for each of 2019 and 2020 and an average of approximately $100 million each year from 2021 through 2023. In addition, Southern Power has a further $2.3 billion in planned expenditures for plant acquisitions and placeholder growth, or approximately $0.5 billion per year on average for 2019 through 2023. Planned expenditures for plant acquisitions and placeholder growth may vary materially due to market opportunities and Southern Power's ability to execute its growth strategy. Actual construction costs may vary from these estimates because of numerous factors such as: changes in business conditions; changes in the expected environmental compliance program; changes in environmental laws and regulations; the outcome of any legal challenges to environmental rules; changes in FERC rules and regulations; changes in load projections; changes in legislation; the cost and efficiency of construction labor, equipment, and materials; project scope and design changes; and the cost of capital. See Note 15 to the financial statements under "Southern Power" for additional information.
Southern Power forecasts contributions to the pension and other postretirement benefit plans over a three-year period. Southern Power anticipates no mandatory contributions to the qualified pension plan during the next three years. See Note 11 to the financial statements for additional information.
Funding requirements related to obligations associated with scheduled maturities of long-term debt, as well as the related interest, leases, derivative obligations, and other purchase commitments are detailed in the contractual obligations table that follows. See Notes 1, 8, 9, and 14 to the financial statements for additional information.
Contractual Obligations
Contractual obligations at December 31, 2018 were as follows:
 2019 
2020-
2021
 
2022-
2023
 
After
2023
 Total
 (in millions)
Long-term debt(a) —
         
Principal$600
 $1,125
 $967
 $2,339
 $5,031
Interest179
 310
 250
 1,409
 2,148
Financial derivative obligations(b)
6
 2
 
 
 8
Operating leases(c)
23
 48
 50
 874
 995
Purchase commitments —         
Capital(d)
252
 461
 144
 
 857
Fuel(e)
601
 744
 369
 32
 1,746
Purchased power(f)
41
 83
 
 
 124
Other(g)
168
 309
 221
 1,471
 2,169
Total$1,870
 $3,082
 $2,001
 $6,125
 $13,078
(a)All amounts are reflected based on final maturity dates and include the effects of interest rate derivatives employed to manage interest rate risk and effects of foreign currency swaps employed to manage foreign currency exchange rate risk. Included in debt principal is an $18 million gain related to the foreign currency hedge of €1.1 billion. Southern Power plans to continue, when economically feasible, to retire higher-cost securities and replace these obligations with lower-cost capital if market conditions permit.
(b)For additional information, see Notes 1 and 14 to the financial statements.
(c)Operating lease commitments include certain land leases for solar and wind facilities that may be subject to annual price escalation based on indices. See Note 9 to the financial statements for additional information.
(d)Southern Power provides estimated capital expenditures for a five-year period, including capital expenditures associated with environmental regulations. Excluded from these amounts are planned expenditures for plant acquisitions and placeholder growth of $2.3 billion. Also excluded from these amounts are capital expenditures covered under LTSAs which are reflected in "Other." See Note (g) below. At December 31, 2018, significant purchase commitments were outstanding in connection with the construction program. No ARO settlements are projected during the five-year period.
(e)Primarily includes commitments to purchase, transport, and store natural gas. Amounts reflected are based on contracted cost and may contain provisions for price escalation. Amounts reflected for natural gas purchase commitments are based on various indices at the time of delivery and have been estimated based on the NYMEX future prices at December 31, 2018.
(f)Purchased power commitments will be resold under a third party agreement at cost.
(g)Includes commitments related to LTSAs, operation and maintenance agreements, and transmission. LTSAs include price escalation based on inflation indices. Transmission commitments are based on the Southern Company system's current tariff rate for point-to-point transmission.

MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
Southern Company Gas and Subsidiary Companies 2018 Annual Report


OVERVIEW
Business Activities
Southern Company Gas is an energy services holding company whose primary business is the distribution of natural gas. Subsequent to the dispositions of Elizabethtown Gas, Elkton Gas, and Florida City Gas discussed herein under "Merger, Acquisition, and Disposition Activities," Southern Company Gas has natural gas distribution utilities in four states – Illinois, Georgia, Virginia, and Tennessee. Southern Company Gas is also involved in several other complementary businesses.
Southern Company Gas manages its business through four reportable segments – gas distribution operations, gas pipeline investments, wholesale gas services, which includes Sequent, a natural gas asset optimization company, and gas marketing services, which includes SouthStar, a provider of energy-related products and services to natural gas markets – and one non-reportable segment, all other. During the fourth quarter 2018, Southern Company Gas changed its reportable segments to further align with the way its new Chief Operating Decision Maker reviews operating results and has reclassified prior years' data to conform to the new reportable segment presentation. This change resulted in a new reportable segment, gas pipeline investments, which was formerly included in gas midstream operations. Gas pipeline investments consists primarily of joint ventures in natural gas pipeline investments including a 50% interest in SNG, two significant pipeline construction projects, and a 50% joint ownership interest in the Dalton Pipeline. Gas distribution operations, wholesale gas services, and gas marketing services continue to remain as separate reportable segments and reflect the impact of the Southern Company Gas Dispositions. The all other non-reportable segment includes segments below the quantitative threshold for separate disclosure, including the storage and fuels operations that were formerly included in gas midstream operations, and other subsidiaries that fall below the quantitative threshold for separate disclosure. See Notes 5, 7, and 16 to the financial statements for additional information.
Many factors affect the opportunities, challenges, and risks of Southern Company Gas' business. These factors include the ability to maintain safety, to maintain constructive regulatory environments, to maintain and grow natural gas sales and number of customers, and to effectively manage and secure timely recovery of costs. These costs include those related to projected long-term demand growth, environmental standards, safety, reliability, resilience, natural gas, and capital expenditures, including updating and expanding the natural gas distribution systems. The natural gas distribution utilities have various regulatory mechanisms that address cost recovery. Effectively operating pursuant to these regulatory mechanisms and appropriately balancing required costs and capital expenditures with customer prices will continue to challenge Southern Company Gas for the foreseeable future. Nicor Gas filed a rate case on November 9, 2018 and Atlanta Gas Light is required to file a rate case no later than June 1, 2019. These rate cases are both expected to conclude in 2019; however, the ultimate outcome of these matters cannot be determined at this time. See FUTURE EARNINGS POTENTIAL – "Regulatory Matters – Rate Proceedings" herein and Note 2 to the financial statements under "Southern Company GasRate Proceedings" for additional information.
Merger, Acquisition, and Disposition Activities
In 2016, Southern Company Gas completed the Merger, pursuant to which Southern Company Gas became a wholly-owned subsidiary of Southern Company. Southern Company accounted for the Merger using the acquisition method of accounting whereby the assets acquired and liabilities assumed were recognized at fair value as of the acquisition date. Pushdown accounting was applied to create a new cost basis for Southern Company Gas' assets, liabilities, and equity as of the acquisition date. Accordingly, the successor financial statements reflect the new basis of accounting, and successor and predecessor period financial results (separated by a heavy black line) are presented, but are not comparable. As a result of the application of acquisition accounting, certain discussions herein include disclosure of the predecessor and successor periods. See Note 15 to the financial statements under "Southern Company Merger with Southern Company Gas" for additional information.
In 2016, Southern Company Gas completed its purchase of Piedmont's 15% interest in SouthStar for $160 million and paid $1.4 billion to acquire a 50% equity interest in SNG, which is expectedthe owner of a 7,000-mile pipeline system connecting natural gas supply basins in Texas, Louisiana, Mississippi, and Alabama to continuemarkets in Louisiana, Mississippi, Alabama, Florida, Georgia, South Carolina, and Tennessee. The investment in SNG is accounted for using the equity method. In March 2017, Southern Company Gas made an additional $50 million contribution to mitigatemaintain its 50% equity interest in SNG. See Note 7 to the financial statements under "Southern Company Gas" and Note 15 to the financial statements under "Southern Company Gas – Investment in SNG" for additional information.
During 2018, Southern Company Gas completed the following sales, resulting in approximately $2.7 billion in aggregate proceeds:
On June 4, 2018, Southern Company Gas completed the stock sale of Pivotal Home Solutions to American Water Enterprises LLC for a total cash purchase price volatility. Atof $365 million, which includes the final working capital adjustment.

MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS (continued)
Southern Company Gas and Subsidiary Companies 2018 Annual Report


This disposition resulted in a net loss of $67 million, which includes $34 million of income tax expense. In contemplation of the transaction, a goodwill impairment charge of $42 million was recorded in 2018.
On July 1, 2018, a Southern Company Gas subsidiary, Pivotal Utility Holdings, completed the sales of the assets of two of its natural gas distribution utilities, Elizabethtown Gas and Elkton Gas, to South Jersey Industries, Inc. for a total cash purchase price of $1.7 billion, which includes the final working capital and other adjustments. This disposition resulted in a pre-tax gain that was entirely offset by $205 million of income tax expense, resulting in no material net income impact.
On July 29, 2018, Southern Company Gas and its wholly-owned direct subsidiary, NUI Corporation, completed the stock sale of Pivotal Utility Holdings, which primarily consisted of Florida City Gas, to NextEra Energy for a total cash purchase price of $587 million, which includes the final working capital adjustment less indebtedness assumed at closing. This disposition resulted in a net gain of $16 million, which includes $103 million of income tax expense.
The after-tax gain and loss on these dispositions included income tax expense on goodwill not deductible for tax purposes and for which a deferred tax liability had not been recorded previously. See Note 15 to the financial statements under "Southern Company Gas" herein for additional information.
Operating Metrics
Southern Company Gas continues to focus on several operating metrics, including Heating Degree Days, customer count, and volumes of natural gas sold.
Southern Company Gas measures weather and the effect on its business using Heating Degree Days. Generally, increased Heating Degree Days result in higher demand for natural gas on Southern Company Gas' distribution system. With the exception of Nicor Gas, Southern Company Gas has various regulatory mechanisms, such as weather normalization and straight-fixed-variable rate design, which limit its exposure to weather changes within typical ranges in each of its utilities' respective service territory. However, the operating revenues from utility customers in Illinois and gas marketing services customers primarily in Georgia and Illinois can be impacted by warmer- or colder-than-normal weather. Southern Company Gas utilizes weather hedges to limit the negative income impacts in the event of warmer-than-normal weather, while retaining a significant portion of the positive benefits of colder-than-normal weather for these businesses.
The number of customers served by gas distribution operations and gas marketing services can be impacted by natural gas prices, economic conditions, and competition from alternative fuels. Gas marketing services' customers are primarily located in Georgia and Illinois.
Southern Company Gas' natural gas volume metrics for gas distribution operations and gas marketing services illustrate the effects of weather and customer demand for natural gas. Wholesale gas services' physical sales volumes represent the daily average natural gas volumes sold to its customers.
See RESULTS OF OPERATIONS herein for additional information on these operating metrics.

MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS (continued)
Southern Company Gas and Subsidiary Companies 2018 Annual Report


Seasonality of Results
During the Heating Season, natural gas usage and operating revenues are generally higher as more customers are connected to the gas distribution systems and natural gas usage is higher in periods of colder weather. Occasionally in the summer, wholesale gas services' operating revenues are impacted due to peak usage by power generators in response to summer energy demands. Southern Company Gas' base operating expenses, excluding cost of natural gas, bad debt expense, and certain incentive compensation costs, are incurred relatively evenly throughout the year. Seasonality also affects the comparison of certain balance sheet items across quarters, including receivables, unbilled revenues, natural gas for sale, and notes payable. However, these items are comparable when reviewing Southern Company Gas' annual results. Thus, Southern Company Gas' operating results can vary significantly from quarter to quarter as a result of seasonality, which is illustrated in the table below.
  Percent Generated During Heating Season
  Operating Revenues Net Income
Successor - 2018 68.7% 96.0%
Successor - 2017 67.3% 73.7%
Successor - July 1, 2016 through December 31, 2016 67.1% 96.5%
Predecessor - January 1, 2016 through June 30, 2016 70.0% 138.9%
Earnings
Net income attributable to Southern Company Gas for the successor year ended December 31, 2018 was $372 million, representing a $129 million, or 53.1%, increase over the previous year. Excluding a $121 million decrease related to the Southern Company Gas Dispositions, net income attributable to Southern Company Gas increased $251 million. This increase was primarily due to lower income tax expense, increased commercial activity at wholesale gas services, increased operating revenues from infrastructure replacement programs and base rate changes at gas distribution operations, and higher earnings from Southern Company Gas' investment in SNG. These increases were partially offset by higher other operations and maintenance expenses primarily due to increased compensation and benefit costs and disposition-related costs, higher depreciation on continued infrastructure investments at gas distribution operations, additional interest expense on new debt issuances, and an increase in charitable donations.
Net income attributable to Southern Company Gas for the successor year ended December 31, 2017 was $243 million, which included net income of $53 million from Southern Company Gas' investment in SNG and $44 million generated from Southern Company Gas' continued investment in infrastructure replacement programs and base rate increases at Atlanta Gas Light, Elizabethtown Gas, and Virginia Natural Gas, less the associated increases in depreciation. Net income also reflects $130 million of additional tax expense resulting from the revaluation of deferred tax assets of $93 million related to the Tax Reform Legislation and $37 million associated with State of Illinois income tax legislation enacted in the third quarter 2017 and new income tax apportionment factors in several states resulting from Southern Company Gas' inclusion in the consolidated Southern Company state tax filings. Also included in net income was $17 million of additional expense resulting from the pushdown of acquisition accounting.
See FUTURE EARNINGS POTENTIAL – "Income Tax Matters" herein and Notes 10 and 15 to the financial statements for additional information.
Net income attributable to Southern Company Gas for the successor period of July 1, 2016 through December 31, 2016 was $114 million, which included $26 million in earnings from the SNG investment, net of related interest expense, partially offset by $12 million of additional expense resulting from the impact of the pushdown of acquisition accounting and $27 million of Merger-related expenses.
Net income attributable to Southern Company Gas for the predecessor period of January 1, 2016 through June 30, 2016 was $131 million, which included $41 million of Merger-related expenses and $14 million of net income attributable to the SouthStar noncontrolling interest, which Southern Company Gas purchased in October 2016. Net income for the predecessor period reflected higher revenues from continued investment in infrastructure programs, partially offset by warm weather, net of hedging, and low earnings from wholesale gas services due to mark-to-market losses.

MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS (continued)
Southern Company Gas and Subsidiary Companies 2018 Annual Report


RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
Operating Results
A condensed income statement for Southern Company Gas follows:
 Successor  Predecessor
 Year Ended December 31, Year Ended December 31, July 1, 2016 through December 31,  January 1, 2016 through
June 30,
 2018 2017 2016  2016
 (in millions)  (in millions)
Operating revenues$3,909
 $3,920
 $1,652
  $1,905
Cost of natural gas1,539
 1,601
 613
  755
Cost of other sales12
 29
 10
  14
Other operations and maintenance981
 945
 480
  452
Depreciation and amortization500
 501
 238
  206
Taxes other than income taxes211
 184
 71
  99
Goodwill impairment42
 
 
  
Gain on dispositions, net(291) 
 
  
Merger-related expenses
 
 41
  56
Total operating expenses2,994
 3,260
 1,453
  1,582
Operating income915
 660
 199
  323
Earnings from equity method investments148
 106
 60
  2
Interest expense, net of amounts capitalized228
 200
 81
  96
Other income (expense), net1
 44
 12
  3
Earnings before income taxes836
 610
 190
  232
Income taxes464
 367
 76
  87
Net Income372
 243
 114
  145
Net income attributable to noncontrolling interest(*)

 
 
  14
Net Income Attributable to Southern Company Gas$372
 $243
 $114
  $131
(*)
Includes Piedmont's 15% interest in SouthStar, which was acquired by Southern Company Gas in 2016. See Note 7 to the financial statements under "Southern Company Gas" for additional information.
The Southern Company Gas Dispositions were completed by July 29, 2018 and represent the primary variance driver for the 2018 changes. Detailed variance explanations are provided herein. See Note 15 to the financial statements under "Southern Company Gas" for additional information on the Southern Company Gas Dispositions.
Operating Revenues
Operating revenues for the successor year ended December 31, 2018 were $3.9 billion, reflecting an $11 million decrease from 2017. Operating revenues for the successor year ended December 31, 2017 and the successor period of July 1, 2016 through December 31, 2016 were $3.9 billion and $1.7 billion, respectively. For the predecessor period of January 1, 2016 through June 30, 2016, operating revenues were $1.9 billion.

MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS (continued)
Southern Company Gas and Subsidiary Companies 2018 Annual Report


For the successor year ended December 31, 2018, details of operating revenues were as follows:
 (in millions) (% change)
Operating revenues – prior year$3,920
  
Estimated change resulting from –   
Infrastructure replacement programs and base rate changes31
 0.8
Gas costs and other cost recovery3
 0.1
Weather13
 0.3
Wholesale gas services138
 3.5
Southern Company Gas Dispositions(*)
(228) (5.8)
Other32
 0.8
Operating revenues – current year$3,909
 (0.3)%
(*)Includes a $154 million decrease related to natural gas revenues, including alternative revenue programs, and a $74 million decrease related to other revenues. See Note 15 to the financial statements under "Southern Company Gas" for additional information.
Revenues from infrastructure replacement programs and base rate changes increased in 2018 primarily due to a $48 million increase at Nicor Gas, partially offset by a $12 million decrease at Atlanta Gas Light. These amounts include gas distribution operations' continued investments recovered through infrastructure replacement programs and base rate increases less revenue reductions for the impacts of the Tax Reform Legislation. See Note 2 to the financial statements under "Southern Company Gas" for additional information.
Revenues increased due to colder weather in 2018 compared to 2017. See "Heating Degree Days" herein for additional information.
Revenues from wholesale gas services increased in 2018 primarily due to increased commercial activity, partially offset by derivative losses. See "Segment Information – Wholesale Gas Services" herein for additional information.
Other revenues increased in 2018 primarily due to a $15 million increase from the Dalton Pipeline being placed in service in August 2017 and a $14 million increase in Nicor Gas' revenue taxes.
For the successor year ended December 31, 2017, natural gas revenues included recovery of $1.6 billion in cost of natural gas and $6 million in net revenues from wholesale gas services, net of $21 million of amortization associated with assets established in the application of acquisition accounting. Also included in natural gas revenues for the successor year ended December 31, 2017 were $99 million in additional revenues generated from gas distribution operations as a result of continued investment in infrastructure replacement programs and increases in base rate revenues at Atlanta Gas Light, Elizabethtown Gas, and Virginia Natural Gas. Natural gas revenues were partially offset by a $13 million negative impact of warmer-than-normal weather, net of hedging.
For the successor period of July 1, 2016 through December 31, 2016, natural gas revenues included recovery of $613 million in cost of natural gas and $24 million in net revenues from wholesale gas services, net of $5 million of amortization associated with assets established in the application of acquisition accounting. Natural gas revenues were partially offset by a $5 million negative impact of warmer-than-normal weather, net of hedging.
For the predecessor period of January 1, 2016 through June 30, 2016, natural gas revenues included recovery of $755 million in cost of natural gas and $32 million in net losses from wholesale gas services. Natural gas revenues were partially offset by a $7 million negative impact of warmer-than-normal weather, net of hedging.
Natural gas distribution rates include provisions to adjust billings for fluctuations in natural gas costs. Therefore, gas costs recovered through natural gas revenues generally equal the amount expensed in cost of natural gas and do not affect net income from gas distribution operations. See "Cost of Natural Gas" herein for additional information. Revenue impacts from weather and customer growth are described further below.
Heating Degree Days
During Heating Season, natural gas usage and operating revenues are generally higher. Weather typically does not have a significant net income impact other than during the Heating Season. The following table presents the Heating Degree Days information for Illinois and Georgia, the primary locations where Southern Company Gas' operations are impacted by weather.

MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS (continued)
Southern Company Gas and Subsidiary Companies 2018 Annual Report


  Years Ended December 31, 2018 vs. normal 2018 vs. 2017 2017 vs. 2016
  
Normal(*)
 2018 2017 2016 colder colder colder (warmer)
  (in thousands)      
Illinois 5,813
 6,101
 5,246
 5,243
 5.0% 16.3% 0.1 %
Georgia 2,539
 2,588
 1,970
 2,175
 1.9% 31.4% (9.4)%
(*)Normal represents the 10-year average from January 1, 2008 through December 31, 2017 for Illinois at Chicago Midway International Airport and for Georgia at Atlanta Hartsfield-Jackson International Airport, based on information obtained from the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, National Climatic Data Center.
Southern Company Gas hedged its exposure to warmer-than-normal weather in Illinois for gas distribution operations and in Illinois and Georgia for gas marketing services. The remaining impacts of weather on earnings are reflected in the chart below.
 Successor  Predecessor
 Year Ended December 31, Year Ended December 31, July 1, 2016 through December 31,  January 1, 2016
through
June 30,
 2018 2017 2016  2016
 (in millions)  (in millions)
Gas Distribution Operations:        
Pre-tax$2
 $(4) $(1)  $(7)
After tax1
 (2) (1)  (5)
         
Gas Marketing Services:        
Pre-tax(2) (9) (4)  
After tax(1) (5) (3)  
Customer Count
The following table provides the number of customers served by Southern Company Gas at December 31, 2018, 2017, and 2016:
  2018 2017 2016
  (in thousands, except market share %)
Gas distribution operations(a)
 4,248
 4,623
 4,586
Gas marketing services      
Energy customers(b)
 697
 774
 656
Market share of energy customers in Georgia 29.0% 29.2% 29.6%
(a)
Includes total customers of approximately 407,000 and 402,000 at December 31, 2017 and 2016, respectively, related to Elizabethtown Gas, Elkton Gas, and Florida City Gas, which were sold in 2018. See Note 15 to the financial statements under "Southern Company GasSale of Elizabethtown Gas and Elkton Gas" and " – Sale of Florida City Gas" for additional information.
(b)Includes customers in Ohio contracted through an annual auction process to serve for a 12-month period beginning April 1 of each year. At December 31, 2018 and 2017, there were approximately 70,000 and 140,000 contracted customers, respectively. At December 31, 2016, there were no contracted customers.
Southern Company Gas anticipates overall customer growth trends at the remaining four natural gas distribution utilities in gas distribution operations to continue as it expects continued improvement in the new housing market and low natural gas prices. Southern Company Gas uses a variety of targeted marketing programs to attract new customers and to retain existing customers.
Cost of Natural Gas
Excluding Atlanta Gas Light, which does not sell natural gas to end-use customers, gas distribution operations charges its utility customers for natural gas consumed using natural gas cost recovery mechanisms set by the applicable state regulatory agencies. Under these mechanisms, all prudently-incurred natural gas costs are passed through to customers without markup, subject to regulatory review. Gas distribution operations defers or accrues the difference between the actual cost of natural gas and the amount of commodity revenue earned in a given period. The deferred or accrued amount is either billed or refunded to customers prospectively through adjustments to the commodity rate. Deferred natural gas costs are reflected as regulatory assets and accrued natural gas costs are reflected as regulatory liabilities. Therefore, gas costs recovered through natural gas revenues generally equal

MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS (continued)
Southern Company Gas and Subsidiary Companies 2018 Annual Report


the amount expensed in cost of natural gas and do not affect net income from gas distribution operations. Cost of natural gas at gas distribution operations represented 83.2% of the total cost of natural gas for 2018.
Gas marketing services customers are charged for actual and estimated natural gas consumed. Cost of natural gas includes the cost of fuel and associated transportation costs, lost and unaccounted for gas, adjustments to reduce the value of inventories to market value, if applicable, and gains and losses associated with certain derivatives.
For the successor year ended December 31, 2018, cost of natural gas was $1.5 billion, a decrease of $62 million, or 3.9%, compared to 2017 substantially all as a result of the Southern Company Gas Dispositions.
For the successor year ended December 31, 2017, cost of natural gas was $1.6 billion, which reflected an increase in natural gas pricing of 26.3% compared to 2016, partially offset by lower demand for natural gas.
For the successor period of July 1, 2016 through December 31, 2016 and the predecessor period of January 1, 2016 through June 30, 2016, cost of natural gas was $613 million and $755 million, respectively, which reflected low demand for natural gas driven by warm weather during those periods.
Volumes of Natural Gas Sold
The following table details the volumes of natural gas sold during all periods presented.
  Year Ended December 31, 2018 vs. 2017 2017 vs. 2016
  2018 2017 2016 % Change % Change
Gas distribution operations (mmBtu in millions)
          
Firm 721
 667
 670
 8.1% (0.4)%
Interruptible 95
 95
 96
 % (1.0)%
Total 816
 762
 766
 7.1% (0.5)%
Wholesale gas services (mmBtu in millions/day)
          
Daily physical sales 6.7
 6.4
 7.4
 4.7% (13.5)%
Gas marketing services (mmBtu in millions)
          
Firm:          
Georgia 37
 32
 34
 15.6% (5.9)%
Illinois 13
 12
 12
 8.3%  %
Other 20
 18
 12
 11.1% 50.0 %
Interruptible large commercial and industrial 14
 14
 14
 %  %
Total 84
 76
 72
 10.5% 5.6 %
Cost of Other Sales
Cost of other sales related to Pivotal Home Solutions, which was sold on June 4, 2018. See Note 15 to the financial statements under "Southern Company GasSale of Pivotal Home Solutions" for additional information.
Other Operations and Maintenance Expenses
For the successor year ended December 31, 2018, other operations and maintenance expenses increased $36 million, or 3.8%, compared to the prior year. Excluding a $39 million decrease related to the Southern Company Gas Dispositions, other operations and maintenance expenses increased $75 million. This increase was primarily due to a $53 million increase in compensation and benefit costs, including a $12 million one-time increase for the adoption of a new paid time off policy to align with the Southern Company system, a $28 million increase in disposition-related costs, and an $11 million expense for a litigation settlement to facilitate the sale of Pivotal Home Solutions. These increases were partially offset by a $27 million decrease in bad debt expense primarily at Nicor Gas, which was offset by a decrease in revenues as a result of the related regulatory recovery mechanism. See Note 3 to the financial statements under "General Litigation Matters – Southern Company Gas" for additional information on the litigation settlement.
For the successor year ended December 31, 2017 and the successor period of July 1, 2016 through December 31, 2016, other operations and maintenance expenses were $945 million and $480 million, respectively, and primarily reflected compensation and benefit costs and professional services, including pipeline compliance and maintenance and legal services.

MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS (continued)
Southern Company Gas and Subsidiary Companies 2018 Annual Report


For the predecessor period of January 1, 2016 through June 30, 2016, other operations and maintenance expenses were $452 million and included pipeline compliance and maintenance costs and compensation and benefit costs.
Depreciation and Amortization
For the successor year ended December 31, 2018, depreciation and amortization decreased $1 million, or 0.2%, compared to the prior year. Excluding a $37 million decrease related to the Southern Company Gas Dispositions, depreciation and amortization increased $36 million. This increase was primarily due to continued infrastructure investments at gas distribution operations, partially offset by lower amortization of intangible assets as a result of fair value adjustments in acquisition accounting at gas marketing services.
For the successor year ended December 31, 2017, depreciation and amortization was $501 million and included $38 million of additional amortization of intangible assets as a result of fair value adjustments in acquisition accounting, primarily at gas marketing services, and $28 million in additional depreciation at gas distribution operations, primarily due to continued investment in infrastructure programs.
For the successor period of July 1, 2016 through December 31, 2016, depreciation and amortization was $238 million and included $23 million of additional amortization of intangible assets as a result of fair value adjustments in acquisition accounting, primarily at gas marketing services, as well as depreciation at gas distribution operations due to continued investment in infrastructure programs.
For the predecessor period of January 1, 2016 through June 30, 2016, depreciation and amortization was $206 million and reflected depreciation related to additional assets placed in service at gas distribution operations due to continued investment in infrastructure programs.
See Notes 2 and 15 to the financial statements under "Southern Company GasInfrastructure Replacement Programs and Capital Projects" and "Southern Company Merger with Southern Company Gas," respectively, for additional information on infrastructure programs and the application of acquisition accounting.
Taxes Other Than Income Taxes
For the successor year ended December 31, 2018, taxes other than income taxes increased $27 million, or 14.7%, compared to the prior year. Excluding a $4 million decrease related to the Southern Company Gas Dispositions, taxes other than income taxes increased $31 million. This increase primarily reflects a $13 million increase in revenue tax expenses as a result of higher natural gas revenues, a $12 million increase in Nicor Gas' invested capital tax that reflects a $7 million credit in 2017 to establish a related regulatory asset, and a $4 million increase in property taxes.
For the successor year ended December 31, 2017, the successor period of July 1, 2016 through December 31, 2016, and the predecessor period of January 1, 2016 through June 30, 2016, taxes other than income taxes were $184 million, $71 million, and $99 million, respectively, which consisted primarily of revenue tax expenses, property taxes, and payroll taxes.
Goodwill Impairment
For the successor year ended December 31, 2018, a goodwill impairment charge of $42 million was recorded in contemplation of the sale of Pivotal Home Solutions. See Notes 1 and 15 to the financial statements under "Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets and Liabilities" and "Southern Company GasSale of Pivotal Home Solutions," respectively, for additional information.
Gain on Dispositions, Net
For the successor year ended December 31, 2018, gain on dispositions, net was $291 million and was associated with the Southern Company Gas Dispositions. The income tax expense on these gains included income tax expense on goodwill not deductible for tax purposes and for which a deferred tax liability had not been recorded previously.
Merger-Related Expenses
There were no Merger-related expenses in the successor years ended December 31, 2018 and 2017.
For the successor period of July 1, 2016 through December 31, 2016, Merger-related expenses were $41 million, including $18 million in rate credits provided to the customers of Elizabethtown Gas and Elkton Gas as conditions of the Merger, $20 million for additional compensation-related expenses, and $3 million for financial advisory fees, legal expenses, and other Merger-related costs.

MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS (continued)
Southern Company Gas and Subsidiary Companies 2018 Annual Report


For the predecessor period of January 1, 2016 through June 30, 2016, Merger-related expenses were $56 million, including $31 million for financial advisory fees, legal expenses, and other Merger-related costs, and $25 million for additional compensation-related expenses.
See Note 15 to the financial statements under "Southern Company Merger with Southern Company Gas" for additional information.
Earnings from Equity Method Investments
For the successor year ended December 31, 2018, earnings from equity method investments increased $42 million, or 39.6%, compared to the prior year. The increase was primarily due to higher earnings from Southern Company Gas' equity method investment in SNG from new rates effective September 2018 and lower operations and maintenance expenses due to the timing of pipeline maintenance.
For the successor year ended December 31, 2017, earnings from equity method investments were $106 million, reflecting $88 million in earnings from Southern Company Gas' investment in SNG, including $33 million related to a non-cash charge recorded by SNG to establish a regulatory liability associated with the Tax Reform Legislation, and $18 million in earnings from all other investments.
For the successor period of July 1, 2016 through December 31, 2016, earnings from equity method investments were $60 million, reflecting $56 million in earnings from Southern Company Gas' investment in SNG and $4 million in earnings from all other investments.
For the predecessor period of January 1, 2016 through June 30, 2016, earnings from equity method investments were not material.
See Notes 7 and 15 to the financial statements under "Southern Company GasEquity Method InvestmentsSNG" and "Southern Company GasInvestment in SNG," respectively, for additional information on Southern Company Gas' investment in SNG.
Interest Expense, Net of Amounts Capitalized
For the successor year ended December 31, 2018, interest expense, net of amounts capitalized increased $28 million, or 14.0%, compared to the prior year. The increase was primarily due to $21 million of additional interest expense related to new debt issuances and a $4 million reduction in capitalized interest primarily due to the Dalton Pipeline being placed in service in August 2017.
For the successor year ended December 31, 2017, interest expense, net of amounts capitalized was $200 million, which includes the $38 million fair value adjustment on long-term debt in acquisition accounting. Interest expense also reflects debt issuances and redemptions during the period and the recognition of previously deferred interest related to regulatory infrastructure programs.
For the successor period of July 1, 2016 through December 31, 2016, interest expense, net of amounts capitalized was $81 million, which includes the $19 million fair value adjustment on long-term debt in acquisition accounting. Interest expense also reflects debt issuances and redemptions during the period and the recognition of previously deferred interest related to regulatory infrastructure programs.
For the predecessor period of January 1, 2016 through June 30, 2016, interest expense, net of amounts capitalized was $96 million, reflecting debt issuances and redemptions during the period and the recognition of previously deferred interest related to regulatory infrastructure programs.
See FUTURE EARNINGS POTENTIAL – "Regulatory Matters – Unrecognized Ratemaking Amounts" herein for additional information on the unrecognized costs related to the infrastructure programs. Also see FINANCIAL CONDITION AND LIQUIDITY – "Financing Activities" herein and Note 8 to the financial statements for additional information on outstanding debt.
Other Income (Expense), Net
For the successor year ended December 31, 2018, other income (expense), net decreased $43 million, or 97.7%, compared to the prior year. Excluding a $3 million decrease related to the Southern Company Gas Dispositions, other income (expense), net decreased $40 million. This decrease was primarily due to a $23 million increase in charitable donations and a $13 million decrease in gains from the settlement of contractor litigation claims.
For the successor year ended December 31, 2017, other income (expense), net was $44 million and primarily related to a $20 million gain from the settlement of contractor litigation claims, $8 million of AFUDC, a $6 million tax gross-up on contributions

MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS (continued)
Southern Company Gas and Subsidiary Companies 2018 Annual Report


in aid of construction, and $4 million of interest income. See Note 2 to the financial statements under "Southern Company Gas – PRP Settlement" for additional information on contractor litigation claims.
For the successor period of July 1, 2016 through December 31, 2016, other income (expense), net was $12 million and primarily related to the tax gross-up of contributions in aid of construction received from customers.
For the predecessor period of January 1, 2016 through June 30, 2016, other income (expense), net was not material.
Income Taxes
For the successor year ended December 31, 2018, income taxes increased $97 million, or 26.4%, compared to the prior year. Excluding a $329 million increase related to the Southern Company Gas Dispositions, including tax expense on the goodwill for which a deferred tax liability had not been previously provided, income taxes decreased $232 million. This decrease was primarily due to a lower federal income tax rate and the flowback of excess deferred taxes as a result of the Tax Reform Legislation. In addition, 2017 included additional tax expense of $130 million from the revaluation of deferred tax assets associated with the Tax Reform Legislation, the enactment of the State of Illinois income tax legislation, and new income tax apportionment factors in several states.
For the successor year ended December 31, 2017, income taxes were $367 million. The effective tax rate in 2017 reflects additional expense from the revaluation of deferred tax assets of $93 million associated with the Tax Reform Legislation and $37 million associated with State of Illinois income tax legislation enacted in the third quarter 2017 and new income tax apportionment factors in several states resulting from Southern Company Gas' inclusion in the consolidated Southern Company state tax filings.
For the successor period of July 1, 2016 through December 31, 2016 and the predecessor period of January 1, 2016 through June 30, 2016, income taxes were $76 million and $87 million, respectively. The effective tax rates during these periods reflect certain nondeductible Merger-related expenses.
See FUTURE EARNINGS POTENTIAL – "Income Tax Matters" herein and Note 10 to the financial statements for additional information.
Effects of Inflation
Southern Company Gas is subject to rate regulation that is generally based on the recovery of historical and projected costs. The effects of inflation can create an economic loss since the recovery of costs could be in dollars that have less purchasing power. Any adverse effect of inflation on Southern Company Gas' results of operations has not been substantial in recent years.
Performance and Non-GAAP Measures
Prior to the Merger, Southern Company Gas evaluated segment performance using EBIT, which includes operating income, earnings from equity method investments, and other income (expense), net. EBIT excludes interest expense, net of amounts capitalized and income taxes (benefit), which were evaluated on a consolidated basis for those periods. EBIT is used herein to discuss the results of Southern Company Gas' segments for the predecessor period as EBIT was the primary measure of segment profit or loss for that period. Subsequent to the Merger, Southern Company Gas changed its segment performance measure from EBIT to net income to better align with the performance measure utilized by Southern Company. EBIT for the successor periods presented herein is considered a non-GAAP measure. Southern Company Gas presents consolidated EBIT, which is considered a non-GAAP measure for all periods presented. The presentation of consolidated EBIT is believed to provide useful supplemental information regarding a consolidated measure of profit or loss. Southern Company Gas further believes the presentation of segment EBIT for the successor periods is useful as it allows for a measure of comparability to other companies with different capital and legal structures, which accordingly may be subject to different interest rates and effective tax rates. The applicable reconciliations of net income to consolidated EBIT and segment EBIT are provided herein.
Adjusted operating margin is a non-GAAP measure that is calculated as operating revenues less cost of natural gas, cost of other sales, and revenue tax expense. Adjusted operating margin excludes other operations and maintenance expenses, depreciation and amortization, taxes other than income taxes, goodwill impairment, gain on dispositions, net, and Merger-related expenses, which are included in the calculation of operating income as calculated in accordance with GAAP and reflected in the statements of income. The presentation of adjusted operating margin is believed to provide useful information regarding the contribution resulting from base rate changes, infrastructure replacement programs and capital projects, and customer growth at gas distribution operations since the cost of natural gas and revenue tax expense can vary significantly and are generally billed directly to customers. Southern Company Gas further believes that utilizing adjusted operating margin at gas pipeline investments, wholesale gas services, and gas marketing services allows it to focus on a direct measure of performance before overhead costs. The applicable reconciliation of operating income to adjusted operating margin is provided herein.

MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS (continued)
Southern Company Gas and Subsidiary Companies 2018 Annual Report


EBIT and adjusted operating margin should not be considered alternatives to, or more meaningful indicators of, Southern Company Gas' operating performance than net income attributable to Southern Company Gas or operating income as determined in accordance with GAAP. In addition, Southern Company Gas' adjusted operating margin may not be comparable to similarly titled measures of other companies.
Detailed variance explanations of Southern Company Gas' financial performance are provided herein.
Reconciliations of operating income to adjusted operating margin and net income attributable to Southern Company Gas to EBIT are as follows:
 Successor  Predecessor
 Year Ended December 31, Year Ended December 31, July 1, 2016 through December 31,  January 1, 2016
through
June 30,
 2018 2017 2016  2016
 (in millions)  (in millions)
Operating Income$915
 $660
 $199
  $323
Other operating expenses(a)
1,443
 1,630
 830
  813
Revenue taxes(b)
(111) (98) (31)  (56)
Adjusted Operating Margin$2,247
 $2,192
 $998
  $1,080
(a)Includes other operations and maintenance, depreciation and amortization, taxes other than income taxes, goodwill impairment, gain on dispositions, net, and Merger-related expenses.
(b)Nicor Gas' revenue tax expenses, which are passed through directly to customers.
 Successor  Predecessor
 Year Ended December 31, Year Ended December 31, July 1, 2016 through December 31,  January 1, 2016 through
June 30,
 2018 2017 2016  2016
 (in millions)  (in millions)
Net Income Attributable to Southern Company Gas$372
 $243
 $114
  $131
Net income attributable to noncontrolling interest
 
 
  14
Income taxes464
 367
 76
  87
Interest expense, net of amounts capitalized228
 200
 81
  96
EBIT$1,064
 $810
 $271
  $328

MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS (continued)
Southern Company Gas and Subsidiary Companies 2018 Annual Report


Segment Information
Adjusted operating margin, operating expenses, and Southern Company Gas' primary performance metric for each segment are illustrated in the tables below.
  Successor
  Year ended December 31, 2018 Year ended December 31, 2017
  
 Adjusted Operating Margin(a)
 
Operating Expenses(a)(b)
 
Net Income (Loss)(b)
 
 Adjusted Operating Margin(a)
 
Operating Expenses(a)
 Net Income (Loss)
  (in millions) (in millions)
Gas distribution operations $1,794
 $890
 $334
 $1,834
 $1,189
 $353
Gas pipeline investments 32
 12
 103
 17
 7
 (22)
Wholesale gas services 134
 64
 38
 5
 56
 (57)
Gas marketing services 263
 244
 (40) 313
 200
 84
All other 33
 131
 (63) 35
 92
 (115)
Intercompany eliminations (9) (9) 
 (12) (12) 
Consolidated $2,247
 $1,332
 $372
 $2,192
 $1,532
 $243
(a)Adjusted operating margin and operating expenses are adjusted for Nicor Gas' revenue tax expenses, which are passed through directly to customers.
(b)
Operating expenses for gas distribution operations and gas marketing services include the gain on dispositions, net. Net income for gas distribution operations and gas marketing services includes the gain on dispositions, net and the associated income tax expense. See Note 15 to the financial statements under "Southern Company Gas" for additional information.
  Successor  Predecessor
  July 1, 2016 through December 31, 2016  January 1, 2016 through June 30, 2016
  
Adjusted Operating Margin(*)
 
Operating Expenses(*)
 Net Income (Loss)  
Adjusted Operating Margin(*)
 
Operating Expenses(*)
 EBIT
  (in millions)  (in millions)
Gas distribution operations $817
 $592
 $77
  $911
 $558
 $353
Gas pipeline investments 3
 2
 29
  3
 
 3
Wholesale gas services 24
 26
 
  (36) 33
 (68)
Gas marketing services 139
 112
 19
  190
 81
 109
All other 19
 71
 (11)  16
 89
 (69)
Intercompany eliminations (4) (4) 
  (4) (4) 
Consolidated $998
 $799
 $114
  $1,080
 $757
 $328
(*)Adjusted operating margin and operating expenses are adjusted for Nicor Gas' revenue tax expenses, which are passed through directly to customers.
Gas Distribution Operations
Gas distribution operations is the largest component of Southern Company Gas' business and is subject to regulation and oversight by agencies in each of the states it serves. These agencies approve natural gas rates designed to provide Southern Company Gas with the opportunity to generate revenues to recover the cost of natural gas delivered to its customers and its fixed and variable costs, including depreciation, interest, operations and maintenance, taxes, and overhead costs, and to earn a reasonable return on its investments.
With the exception of Atlanta Gas Light, Southern Company Gas' second largest utility that operates in a deregulated natural gas market and has a straight-fixed-variable rate design that minimizes the variability of its revenues based on consumption, the earnings of the natural gas distribution utilities can be affected by customer consumption patterns that are a function of weather conditions, price levels for natural gas, and general economic conditions that may impact customers' ability to pay for natural gas consumed. Southern Company Gas has various weather mechanisms, such as weather normalization mechanisms and weather derivative instruments, that limit its exposure to weather changes within typical ranges in its natural gas distribution utilities' service territories.

MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS (continued)
Southern Company Gas and Subsidiary Companies 2018 Annual Report


On July 1, 2018, a Southern Company Gas subsidiary, Pivotal Utility Holdings, completed the sales of the assets of two of its natural gas distribution utilities, Elizabethtown Gas and Elkton Gas, to South Jersey Industries, Inc. On July 29, 2018, Southern Company Gas and its wholly-owned direct subsidiary, NUI Corporation, completed the sale of Pivotal Utility Holdings, which primarily consisted of Florida City Gas, to NextEra Energy. See Note 15 to the financial statements under "Southern Company Gas" for additional information.
2018 vs. 2017
Net income decreased $19 million, or 5.4%, compared to the prior year, which includes a $40 million decrease in adjusted operating margin, a $299 million decrease in operating expenses, and a $22 million decrease in other income (expense), net resulting in a $237 million increase in EBIT. The decrease in net income also includes a $25 million increase in interest expense, net of amounts capitalized and a $231 million increase in income tax expense.
Excluding a $90 million decrease attributable to the utilities sold during 2018, adjusted operating margin increased $50 million, which primarily reflects additional revenue from infrastructure investments and colder weather in 2018, partially offset by lower rates and revenue deferrals for regulatory liabilities associated with the Tax Reform Legislation impacts. Excluding a $391 million decrease attributable to the utilities sold during 2018 that includes the related gains on the sales, operating expenses increased $92 million. This increase reflects $40 million of additional depreciation primarily due to additional assets placed in service, $37 million of additional other operations and maintenance expenses primarily due to increased compensation and benefit costs, partially offset by a decrease in bad debt expense, and $15 million of additional taxes other than income taxes primarily due to a $12 million increase in Nicor Gas' invested capital tax. Excluding a $3 million decrease attributable to the utilities sold during 2018, other income (expense), net decreased $20 million, which primarily reflects a $13 million decrease in gains from the settlement of contractor litigation claims. The increase in interest expense reflects $14 million of additional interest expense primarily from the issuance of first mortgage bonds at Nicor Gas. Excluding a $290 million decrease attributable to the utilities sold in 2018, income tax expense decreased $59 million, primarily due to lower pretax earnings, a lower federal income tax rate, and the flowback of excess deferred taxes as a result of the Tax Reform Legislation.
Successor Year Ended December 31, 2017
Net income of $353 million includes $1.8 billion in adjusted operating margin, $1.2 billion in operating expenses, and $39 million in other income (expense), net, which resulted in EBIT of $684 million. Net income also includes $153 million in interest expense, net of amounts capitalized and $178 million in income tax expense. Adjusted operating margin reflects $99 million in additional revenue from continued investment in infrastructure replacement programs and base rate increases at Atlanta Gas Light, Elizabethtown Gas, and Virginia Natural Gas. Adjusted operating margin was also affected by increased customer growth, partially offset by the negative impact of warmer-than-normal weather, net of hedging. Operating expenses reflect a $28 million increase in depreciation associated with additional assets placed in service, as well as benefit and compensation costs, legal expenses, and pipeline compliance and maintenance expenses. Other income (expense), net reflects a $20 million gain from the settlement of contractor litigation claims. Interest expense reflects the impact of intercompany promissory notes executed in December 2016 and the issuance of first mortgage bonds at Nicor Gas in August 2017 and November 2017. Income tax expense includes a $22 million benefit as a result of the Tax Reform Legislation.
See Note 2 to the financial statements under "Southern Company Gas – PRP Settlement" for additional information on contractor litigation claims. See FINANCIAL CONDITION AND LIQUIDITY – "Financing Activities" herein and Note 8 to the financial statements for additional information on debt issuances. See FUTURE EARNINGS POTENTIAL – "Income Tax Matters" herein and Note 10 to the financial statements for additional information.
Successor Period of July 1, 2016 through December 31, 2016
Net income of $77 million includes $817 million in adjusted operating margin, $592 million in operating expenses, and $8 million in other income (expense), net, resulting in EBIT of $233 million. Net income also includes $105 million in interest expense, net of amounts capitalized and $51 million in income tax expense. Adjusted operating margin reflects revenue from continued investment in infrastructure replacement programs, partially offset by the impact of warm weather, net of hedging. Operating expenses reflect the depreciation associated with additional assets placed in service, the related expenses associated with pipeline compliance and maintenance activities, and $18 million of rate credits provided to the customers of Elizabethtown Gas and Elkton Gas as conditions of the Merger. See Note 15 to the financial statements under "Southern Company Merger with Southern Company Gas" for additional information.

MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS (continued)
Southern Company Gas and Subsidiary Companies 2018 Annual Report


Predecessor Period of January 1, 2016 through June 30, 2016
EBIT of $353 million includes $911 million in adjusted operating margin and $558 million in operating expense. Adjusted operating margin reflects increased revenue from continued investment in infrastructure replacement programs and the impact of customer usage and growth, partially offset by the impact of warm weather, net of hedging. Operating expenses reflect the depreciation associated with additional assets placed in service.
Gas Pipeline Investments
Gas pipeline investments consists primarily of joint ventures in natural gas pipeline investments including SNG, Atlantic Coast Pipeline, PennEast Pipeline, and Dalton Pipeline. See Note 7 to the financial statements under "Southern Company Gas" for additional information.
2018 vs. 2017
Net income increased $125 million compared to the prior year, which includes a $15 million increase in adjusted operating margin primarily due to the Dalton Pipeline being placed in service in August 2017, a $5 million increase in operating expenses primarily due to increased depreciation and property tax expense related to the Dalton Pipeline, and a $42 million increase in earnings from equity method investments primarily at SNG, resulting in a $52 million increase in EBIT. The increase in net income also includes an $8 million increase in interest expense, net of amounts capitalized primarily due to a reduction in capitalized interest after the Dalton Pipeline was placed in service and an $81 million decrease in income tax expense primarily due to a lower federal income tax rate in 2018 and additional tax expense recorded in 2017 associated with the Tax Reform Legislation, partially offset by higher pretax earnings.
Successor Year Ended December 31, 2017
Net loss of $22 million includes $17 million in adjusted operating margin, $7 million in operating expenses, and $103 million in earnings from equity method investments, consisting primarily of Southern Company Gas' equity interest in SNG, including $33 million related to a non-cash charge recorded by SNG to establish a regulatory liability associated with the Tax Reform Legislation, which resulted in EBIT of $113 million. Also included in net income are $26 million in interest expense, net of amounts capitalized and $109 million in income tax expense. Income tax expense includes $66 million resulting from the revaluation of deferred income tax assets associated with the Tax Reform Legislation and $7 million related to the allocation of new income tax apportionment factors in several states resulting from Southern Company Gas' inclusion in the consolidated Southern Company state tax filings. See FUTURE EARNINGS POTENTIAL – "Income Tax Matters" herein and Note 10 to the financial statements for additional information.
Successor Period of July 1, 2016 through December 31, 2016
Net income of $29 million includes $3 million in adjusted operating margin, $2 million in operating expenses, and $59 million in earnings from equity method investments, consisting primarily of Southern Company Gas' 2016 acquired equity interest in SNG, resulting in EBIT of $60 million. Also included in net income are $10 million in interest expense, net of amounts capitalized and $21 million in income tax expense.
Predecessor Period of January 1, 2016 through June 30, 2016
Earnings before interest and taxes for the predecessor period of January 1, 2016 through June 30, 2016 was $3 million.
Wholesale Gas Services
Wholesale gas services is involved in asset management and optimization, storage, transportation, producer and peaking services, natural gas supply, natural gas services, and wholesale gas marketing. Southern Company Gas has positioned the business to generate positive economic earnings on an annual basis even under low volatility market conditions that can result from a number of factors. When market price volatility increases, wholesale gas services is well positioned to capture significant value and generate stronger results. Operating expenses primarily reflect employee compensation and benefits.
2018 vs. 2017
Net income increased $95 million, or 166.7%, compared to the prior year, which includes a $129 million increase in adjusted operating margin, an $8 million increase in operating expenses, a $1 million increase in interest income, and a $21 million decrease in other income (expense), net resulting in a $101 million increase in EBIT. The increase in net income also includes a $2 million increase in interest expense, net of amounts capitalized and a $4 million increase in income tax expense. Details of the increase in adjusted operating margin are provided in the table below. The increase in operating expenses primarily reflects higher

MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS (continued)
Southern Company Gas and Subsidiary Companies 2018 Annual Report


compensation and benefit expense. The decrease in other income (expense), net primarily reflects increased charitable donations. The increase in income tax expense reflects higher pretax earnings, partially offset by a lower federal income tax rate.
Successor Year Ended December 31, 2017
Net loss of $57 million includes $5 million in adjusted operating margin, $56 million in operating expenses, and $1 million in other income (expense), net, which resulted in a loss before interest and taxes of $50 million. Also included are $7 million in interest expense, net of amounts capitalized. Adjusted operating margin reflects a decrease of $21 million due to fair value adjustments to certain assets and liabilities in the application of acquisition accounting. Also reflected in adjusted operating margin is revenue from commercial activity partially offset by mark-to-market losses. Income tax expense includes $21 million resulting from the revaluation of deferred income tax assets associated with the Tax Reform Legislation. See FUTURE EARNINGS POTENTIAL – "Income Tax Matters" herein and Note 10 to the financial statements for additional information.
Successor Period of July 1, 2016 through December 31, 2016
Net income includes $24 million in adjusted operating margin, $26 million in operating expenses, and $2 million in other income (expense), net, resulting in no EBIT. Also included are $3 million in interest expense, net of amounts capitalized and $3 million in income tax benefit. Adjusted operating margin reflects a decrease of $5 million due to fair value adjustments to certain assets and liabilities in the application of acquisition accounting. Also reflected in adjusted operating margin are mark-to-market gains due to changes in natural gas prices in the fourth quarter 2016 and losses from commercial activity due to low volatility in natural gas prices and warm weather. Operating expenses reflect low incentive compensation expense due to low earnings.
Predecessor Period of January 1, 2016 through June 30, 2016
Loss before interest and taxes of $68 million includes $(36) million in adjusted operating margin, $33 million in operating expense, and $1 million in other income (expense), net. Adjusted operating margin reflects mark-to-market losses and LOCOM adjustments as a result of changes in natural gas prices and revenues from commercial activity driven by changes in price volatility. Operating expenses reflect lower incentive compensation expense as compared to the same period in the prior year due to lower earnings.
The following table illustrates the components of wholesale gas services' adjusted operating margin for the periods presented:
 Successor  Predecessor
 Year Ended December 31, Year Ended December 31, July 1, 2016 through December 31,  January 1, 2016
through
June 30,
 2018 2017  2016  2016
 (in millions)  (in millions)
Commercial activity recognized$254
 $116
 $(15)  $34
Gain (loss) on storage derivatives9
 23
 (20)  (38)
Gain (loss) on transportation and forward
commodity derivatives
(119) (113) 64
  (31)
LOCOM adjustments, net of current period recoveries(7) 
 
  (1)
Purchase accounting adjustments to fair value
inventory and contracts
(3) (21) (5)  
Adjusted operating margin$134
 $5
 $24
  $(36)
Change in Commercial Activity
The commercial activity at wholesale gas services includes recognition of storage and transportation values that were generated in prior periods, which reflect the impact of prior period hedge gains and losses as associated physical transactions occur. The increase in commercial activity in 2018 compared to the prior year was primarily due to natural gas price volatility that was generated by favorable weather and a corresponding increase in power generation volumes coupled with decreased natural gas supply.
Change in Storage and Transportation Derivatives
Volatility in the natural gas market arises from a number of factors, such as weather fluctuations or changes in supply or demand for natural gas in different regions of the U.S. The volatility of natural gas commodity prices has a significant impact on Southern Company Gas' customer rates, long-term competitive position against other energy sources, and the ability of wholesale gas

MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS (continued)
Southern Company Gas and Subsidiary Companies 2018 Annual Report


services to capture value from locational and seasonal spreads. Forward storage or time spreads applicable to the locations of wholesale gas services' specific storage positions in 2018 resulted in storage derivative gains. Transportation and forward commodity losses in 2018 are primarily the result of widening transportation spreads due to favorable weather, which impacted forward prices at natural gas receipt and delivery points primarily in the Northeast and Midwest regions.
The natural gas that Southern Company Gas purchases and injects into storage is accounted for at the LOCOM value utilizing gas daily or spot prices at the end of the year. A LOCOM adjustment, net of current period recoveries of $7 million, was recorded during 2018 and LOCOM adjustments for all other periods presented were immaterial. See Note 1 to the financial statements under "Natural Gas for Sale" for additional information.
Withdrawal Schedule and Physical Transportation Transactions
The expected natural gas withdrawals from storage and expected offset to prior hedge losses/gains associated with the transportation portfolio of wholesale gas services are presented in the following table, along with the net operating revenues expected at the time of withdrawal from storage and the physical flow of natural gas between contracted transportation receipt and delivery points. Wholesale gas services' expected net operating revenues exclude storage and transportation demand charges, as well as other variable fuel, withdrawal, receipt, and delivery charges, and exclude estimated profit sharing under asset management agreements. Further, the amounts that are realizable in future periods are based on the inventory withdrawal schedule, planned physical flow of natural gas between the transportation receipt and delivery points, and forward natural gas prices at December 31, 2018. A portion of wholesale gas services' storage inventory and transportation capacity is economically hedged with futures contracts, which results in the realization of substantially fixed net operating revenues.
 Storage Withdrawal  
 
Total storage(a)
 
Expected net operating losses(b)
 
Physical Transportation Transactions – Expected Net Operating Gains(c)
 (in mmBtu in millions) (in millions) (in millions)
201948
 $(8) $12
2020 and thereafter
 
 107
Total at December 31, 201848
 $(8) $119
(a)At December 31, 2018, the WACOG of wholesale gas services' expected natural gas withdrawals from storage was $2.90 per mmBtu.
(b)Represents expected operating losses from planned storage withdrawals associated with existing inventory positions and could change as wholesale gas services adjusts its daily injection and withdrawal plans in response to changes in future market conditions and forward NYMEX price fluctuations.
(c)Represents the periods associated with the transportation derivative net gains during which the derivatives will be settled and the physical transportation transactions will occur that offset the derivative gains and losses that were previously recognized.
Gas Marketing Services
Gas marketing services provides energy-related products and services to natural gas markets and participants in customer choice programs that were approved in various states to increase competition. These programs allow customers to choose their natural gas supplier while the local distribution utility continues to provide distribution and transportation services. Gas marketing services is weather sensitive and uses a variety of hedging strategies, such as weather derivative instruments and other risk management tools, to partially mitigate potential weather impacts.
On June 4, 2018, Southern Company Gas completed the sale of Pivotal Home Solutions to American Water Enterprises LLC. See Note 15 under "Southern Company GasSale of Pivotal Home Solutions" for additional information.
2018 vs. 2017
Net income decreased $124 million, or 147.6%, compared to the prior year, which includes a $50 million decrease in adjusted operating margin, a $44 million increase in operating expenses, and a $1 million increase in other income (expense), net resulting in a $93 million decrease in EBIT. The decrease in net income also includes a $1 million increase in interest expense, net of amounts capitalized and a $30 million increase in income tax expense.
Excluding a $57 million decrease attributable to Pivotal Home Solutions, adjusted operating margin increased $7 million, which primarily reflects colder weather in 2018, customer growth, and favorable retail price spreads. Excluding a $42 million increase attributable to Pivotal Home Solutions that includes the loss on disposition and the goodwill impairment charge, operating expense increased $2 million. Excluding a $39 million increase attributable to Pivotal Home Solutions, income tax expense decreased $9 million driven by a lower federal income tax rate, partially offset by higher pretax earnings.

MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS (continued)
Southern Company Gas and Subsidiary Companies 2018 Annual Report


Successor Year Ended December 31, 2017
Net income of $84 million includes $313 million in adjusted operating margin and $200 million in operating expenses, which resulted in EBIT of $113 million. Net income also includes $5 million in interest expense, net of amounts capitalized and $24 million in income tax expense. Adjusted operating margin reflects a $9 million negative impact of warmer-than-normal weather, net of hedging, and $4 million in unrealized hedge losses, net of recoveries. Operating expenses includes $40 million in additional amortization of intangible assets established in the application of acquisition accounting. Income tax expense includes a $19 million benefit as a result of the Tax Reform Legislation. See FUTURE EARNINGS POTENTIAL – "Income Tax Matters" herein and Note 10 to the financial statements for additional information.
Successor Period of July 1, 2016 through December 31, 2016
Net income of $19 million includes $139 million in adjusted operating margin and $112 million in operating expenses, resulting in EBIT of $27 million Net income also includes $1 million in interest expense, net of amounts capitalized and $7 million in income tax expense. Adjusted operating margin reflects a reduction of $5 million due to fair value adjustments to certain assets and liabilities in the application of acquisition accounting. Also reflected in adjusted operating margin are unrealized hedge gains and LOCOM adjustments. Operating expenses reflect $23 million in additional amortization of intangible assets, partially offset by a $2 million reduction in operations and maintenance expenses due to fair value adjustments to certain assets and liabilities in the application of acquisition accounting. See Note 1 to the financial statements under "Natural Gas for Sale" for additional information on LOCOM adjustments and Note 15 to the financial statements under "Southern Company Merger with Southern Company Gas" for additional information on the Merger.
Predecessor Period of January 1, 2016 through June 30, 2016
EBIT of $109 million includes $190 million in adjusted operating margin and $81 million in operating expenses. Adjusted operating margin reflects $9 million in unrealized hedge gains. Operating expenses reflect lower bad debt, marketing, and depreciation and amortization, compared to the same period in the prior year. Earnings also include $14 million attributable to noncontrolling interest.
All Other
All other includes Southern Company Gas' storage and fuels operations and its investment in Triton, AGL Services Company, and Southern Company Gas Capital, as well as various corporate operating expenses that are not allocated to the reportable segments and interest income (expense) associated with affiliate financing arrangements.
2018 vs. 2017
Net loss decreased $52 million, or 45.2%, compared to the prior year, which includes a $2 million decrease in adjusted operating margin, a $39 million increase in operating expenses, a $3 million increase in interest income, and a $5 million decrease in other income (expense), net resulting in a $43 million decrease in EBIT. The decrease in net loss also includes an $8 million decrease in interest expense, net of amounts capitalized and an $87 million decrease in income tax expense. The increase in operating expenses primarily reflects a $28 million increase in disposition-related costs and a $12 million increase in compensation expenses resulting from the adoption of a new paid time off policy. The decrease in income tax expense primarily reflects the 2017 increase in income tax expense related to the revaluation of deferred tax assets associated with the Tax Reform Legislation, the enactment of the State of Illinois income tax legislation, new income tax apportionment factors in several states, and a lower federal income tax rate in 2018. The decrease also reflects lower pretax earnings in 2018 compared to 2017.
Successor Year Ended December 31, 2017
Net loss of $115 million includes $35 million in adjusted operating margin and $92 million in operating expenses. Operating expenses included $26 million of integration-related costs. Interest expense, net of amounts capitalized was $9 million due to intercompany promissory notes that were executed in December 2016. Income tax expense was $56 million and includes $46 million resulting from the revaluation of deferred tax assets associated with the Tax Reform Legislation and $30 million associated with State of Illinois tax legislation enacted during the third quarter 2017 and new income tax apportionment factors in several states resulting from Southern Company Gas' inclusion in the consolidated Southern Company state tax filings, partially offset by income tax benefit on the pre-tax loss. See FINANCIAL CONDITION AND LIQUIDITY – "Financing Activities" herein for additional financing information and FUTURE EARNINGS POTENTIAL – "Income Tax Matters" herein and Note 10 to the financial statements for additional information.

MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS (continued)
Southern Company Gas and Subsidiary Companies 2018 Annual Report


Successor Period of July 1, 2016 through December 31, 2016
Operating expenses included Merger-related expenses of $41 million primarily comprised of compensation-related expenses, financial advisory fees, legal expenses, and other Merger-related costs and $8 million in expenses associated with certain benefit arrangements.
Predecessor Period of January 1, 2016 through June 30, 2016
For the predecessor period of January 1, 2016 through June 30, 2016, operating expenses included Merger-related expenses of $56 million. These expenses are primarily comprised of financial advisory and legal expenses as well as additional compensation-related expenses, including acceleration of share-based compensation expenses, and change-in-control compensation charges. See Note 15 to the financial statements under "Southern Company Merger with Southern Company Gas" for additional information.
Segment Reconciliations
Reconciliations of net income attributable to Southern Company Gas to EBIT for the years ended December 31, 2018 and 2017 and the period of July 1, 2016 through December 31, 2016, and operating income to adjusted operating margin for all periods presented, are in the following tables. See Note 16 to the financial statements under "Southern Company Gas" for additional segment information.
 Successor
 Year Ended December 31, 2018
 Gas Distribution OperationsGas Pipeline InvestmentsWholesale Gas ServicesGas Marketing ServicesAll OtherIntercompany EliminationConsolidated
 (in millions)
Net Income (Loss) Attributable
to Southern Company Gas
$334
$103
$38
$(40)$(63)$
$372
Income taxes (benefit)409
28
4
54
(31)
464
Interest expense, net of amounts
capitalized
178
34
9
6
1

228
EBIT$921
$165
$51
$20
$(93)$
$1,064
 Successor
 Year Ended December 31, 2017
 Gas Distribution OperationsGas Pipeline InvestmentsWholesale Gas ServicesGas Marketing ServicesAll OtherIntercompany EliminationConsolidated
 (in millions)
Net Income (Loss) Attributable
to Southern Company Gas
$353
$(22)$(57)$84
$(115)$
$243
Income taxes178
109

24
56

367
Interest expense, net of amounts
capitalized
153
26
7
5
9

200
EBIT$684
$113
$(50)$113
$(50)$
$810

MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS (continued)
Southern Company Gas and Subsidiary Companies 2018 Annual Report


 Successor
 July 1, 2016 through December 31, 2016
 Gas Distribution OperationsGas Pipeline InvestmentsWholesale Gas ServicesGas Marketing ServicesAll OtherIntercompany EliminationConsolidated
 (in millions)
Net Income (Loss) Attributable
to Southern Company Gas
$77
$29
$
$19
$(11)$
$114
Income taxes (benefit)51
21
(3)7


76
Interest expense, net of amounts
capitalized
105
10
3
1
(38)
81
EBIT$233
$60
$
$27
$(49)$
$271
 Successor
 Year Ended December 31, 2018
 Gas Distribution OperationsGas Pipeline InvestmentsWholesale Gas ServicesGas Marketing ServicesAll OtherIntercompany EliminationConsolidated
 (in millions)
Operating Income (Loss)$904
$20
$70
$19
$(98)$
$915
Other operating expenses(a)
1,001
12
64
244
131
(9)1,443
Revenue tax expense(b)
(111)




(111)
Adjusted Operating Margin 
$1,794
$32
$134
$263
$33
$(9)$2,247
 Successor
 Year Ended December 31, 2017
 Gas Distribution OperationsGas Pipeline InvestmentsWholesale Gas ServicesGas Marketing ServicesAll OtherIntercompany EliminationConsolidated
 (in millions)
Operating Income (Loss)$645
$10
$(51)$113
$(57)$
$660
Other operating expenses(a)
1,287
7
56
200
92
(12)1,630
Revenue tax expense(b)
(98)




(98)
Adjusted Operating Margin 
$1,834
$17
$5
$313
$35
$(12)$2,192
 Successor
 July 1, 2016 through December 31, 2016
 Gas Distribution OperationsGas Pipeline InvestmentsWholesale Gas ServicesGas Marketing ServicesAll OtherIntercompany EliminationConsolidated
 (in millions)
Operating Income (Loss)$225
$1
$(2)$27
$(52)$
$199
Other operating expenses(a)
623
2
26
112
71
(4)830
Revenue tax expense(b)
(31)




(31)
Adjusted Operating Margin 
$817
$3
$24
$139
$19
$(4)$998

MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS (continued)
Southern Company Gas and Subsidiary Companies 2018 Annual Report


 Predecessor
 January 1, 2016 through June 30, 2016
 Gas Distribution OperationsGas Pipeline InvestmentsWholesale Gas ServicesGas Marketing ServicesAll OtherIntercompany EliminationConsolidated
 (in millions)
Operating Income (Loss)$353
$3
$(69)$109
$(73)$
$323
Other operating expenses(a)
614

33
81
89
(4)813
Revenue tax expense(b)
(56)




(56)
Adjusted Operating Margin 
$911
$3
$(36)$190
$16
$(4)$1,080
(a)Includes other operations and maintenance, depreciation and amortization, taxes other than income taxes, goodwill impairment, gain on dispositions, net, and Merger-related expenses.
(b)Nicor Gas' revenue tax expenses, which are passed through directly to customers.
FUTURE EARNINGS POTENTIAL
General
The results of operations for the past three years are not necessarily indicative of future earnings potential. The Southern Company Gas Dispositions are expected to materially decrease future earnings and cash flows to Southern Company Gas. For the year ended December 31, 2018, pre-tax earnings attributable to these dispositions were $297 million, which includes a $291 million gain on dispositions, net and a $42 million goodwill impairment. For the year ended December 31, 2017, net income attributable to these dispositions was $71 million, which included additional tax expense of $16 million associated with the Tax Reform Legislation. Due to the seasonal nature of the natural gas business and other factors including, but not limited to, weather, regulation, competition, customer demand, and general economic conditions, these results are not necessarily indicative of the results to be expected for any other period. The level of Southern Company Gas' future earnings depends on numerous factors that affect the opportunities, challenges, and risks of Southern Company Gas' primary business of natural gas distribution and its complementary businesses in the gas pipeline investments, wholesale gas services, and gas marketing services sectors. These factors include Southern Company Gas' ability to maintain constructive regulatory environments that allow for the timely recovery of prudently-incurred costs, the completion and subsequent operation of ongoing infrastructure and other construction projects, creditworthiness of customers, its ability to optimize its transportation and storage positions, and its ability to re-contract storage rates at favorable prices.
Future earnings will be driven by customer growth and are subject to a variety of other factors. These factors include weather, competition, new energy contracts with other utilities and other wholesale customers, energy conservation practiced by customers, the use of alternative energy sources by customers, the price of natural gas, the price elasticity of demand, and the rate of economic growth or decline in Southern Company Gas' service territories. Demand for natural gas is primarily driven by the pace of economic growth that may be affected by changes in regional and global economic conditions, which may impact future earnings.
Volatility of natural gas prices has a significant impact on Southern Company Gas' customer rates, its long-term competitive position against other energy sources, and the ability of its gas marketing services and wholesale gas services segments to capture value from locational and seasonal spreads. Additionally, changes in commodity prices subject a significant portion of Southern Company Gas' operations to earnings variability. Over the longer term, volatility is expected to be low to moderate and locational and/or transportation spreads are expected to decrease as new pipelines are built to reduce the existing supply constraints in the shale areas of the Northeast U.S. To the extent these pipelines are delayed or not built, volatility could increase. See "FERC Matters" herein for additional information on permitting challenges experienced by the Atlantic Coast Pipeline. Additional economic factors may contribute to this environment, including a significant drop in oil and natural gas prices, which could lead to consolidation of natural gas producers or reduced levels of natural gas production. Further, if economic conditions continue to improve, the demand for natural gas may increase, which may cause natural gas prices to rise and drive higher volatility in the natural gas markets on a longer-term basis.
As part of its business strategy, Southern Company Gas regularly considers and evaluates joint development arrangements as well as acquisitions and dispositions of businesses and assets.
On June 4, 2018, Southern Company Gas completed the stock sale of Pivotal Home Solutions to American Water Enterprises LLC. Southern Company Gas and American Water Enterprises LLC entered into a transition services

MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS (continued)
Southern Company Gas and Subsidiary Companies 2018 Annual Report


agreement whereby Southern Company Gas provided certain administrative and operational services through November 4, 2018.
On July 1, 2018, a Southern Company Gas subsidiary, Pivotal Utility Holdings, completed the sales of the assets of two of its natural gas distribution utilities, Elizabethtown Gas and Elkton Gas, to South Jersey Industries, Inc. Southern Company Gas and South Jersey Industries, Inc. entered into transition services agreements whereby Southern Company Gas will provide certain administrative and operational services through no later than July 31, 2020.
On July 29, 2018, Southern Company Gas and its wholly-owned direct subsidiary, NUI Corporation, completed the stock sale of Pivotal Utility Holdings, which primarily consisted of Florida City Gas, to NextEra Energy. Southern Company Gas and NextEra Energy entered into a transition services agreement whereby Southern Company Gas will provide certain administrative and operational services through no later than July 29, 2020.
See OVERVIEW – "Merger, Acquisition, and Disposition Activities" herein and Note 15 to the financial statements under "Southern Company Gas" for additional information on these dispositions. See BUSINESS – "Seasonality" in Item 1, RISK FACTORS in Item 1A, and OVERVIEW – "Seasonality of Results" for additional information on seasonality.
Environmental Matters
Southern Company Gas' operations are regulated by state and federal environmental agencies through a variety of laws and regulations governing air, water, land, and protection of other natural resources. Southern Company Gas maintains a comprehensive environmental compliance strategy to assess upcoming requirements and compliance costs associated with these environmental laws and regulations. The costs, including capital expenditures and operations and maintenance costs, required to comply with environmental laws and regulations may impact future results of operations, cash flows, and financial condition. A major portion of these compliance costs are expected to be recovered through customer rates. The ultimate impact of the environmental laws and regulations discussed herein will depend on various factors, such as state adoption and implementation of requirements and the outcome of pending and/or future legal challenges.
New or revised environmental laws and regulations could affect many areas of Southern Company Gas' operations. The impact of any such changes cannot be determined at this time. Environmental compliance costs could affect earnings if such costs cannot continue to be recovered in rates on a timely basis. Further, increased costs that are recovered through regulated rates could contribute to reduced demand for natural gas, which could negatively affect results of operations, cash flows, and/or financial condition. Additionally, many commercial and industrial customers may also be affected by existing and future environmental requirements, which for some may have the potential to ultimately affect their demand for natural gas.
Environmental Remediation
Southern Company Gas is subject to environmental remediation liabilities associated with 40 former MGP sites in four different states. Southern Company Gas conducts studies to determine the extent of any required cleanup and has recognized the costs to clean up known impacted sites in its financial statements. An accrued environmental remediation liability of $294 million was included in the balance sheets at December 31, 2018, of which $26 million is expected to be incurred over the next 12 months. The accrued environmental remediation liability decreased at December 31, 2018 primarily due to the disposition of $85 million that related to Elizabethtown Gas. The natural gas distribution utilities in Illinois and Georgia have received authority from their respective state regulators to recover approved environmental compliance costs through regulatory mechanisms, which covers substantially all of the Company's energy-related derivative contracts were designated as regulatory hedgestotal accrued remediation costs. See FINANCIAL CONDITION AND LIQUIDITY – "Capital Requirements and were relatedContractual Obligations" herein and Note 3 to the Company's fuel-hedging program. Effectivefinancial statements under "Environmental Remediation" for additional information.
Water Quality
In 2015, the EPA and the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (Corps) jointly published a final rule that revised the regulatory definition of waters of the United States (WOTUS) for all Clean Water Act programs. The rule significantly expanded the scope of federal jurisdiction over waterbodies (such as rivers, streams, and canals), which could impact permitting and reporting requirements associated with the installation, expansion, and maintenance of pipeline projects. The EPA and the Corps are expected to publish a final rule in 2019 to replace the 2015 WOTUS definition. The impact of any changes to the 2015 WOTUS rule will depend on the content of this final rule and the outcome of any legal challenges.
Global Climate Issues
The EPA's GHG reporting rule requires annual reporting of GHG emissions expressed in terms of metric tons of CO2 equivalent emissions for a company's operational control of facilities. Based on ownership or financial control of facilities, Southern

MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS (continued)
Southern Company Gas and Subsidiary Companies 2018 Annual Report


Company Gas' 2017 GHG emissions were approximately 0.6 million metric tons of CO2 equivalent. The preliminary estimate of Southern Company Gas' 2018 GHG emissions on the same basis is approximately 0.6 million metric tons of CO2 equivalent.
FERC Matters
Southern Company Gas is involved in two significant pipeline construction projects within gas pipeline investments. These projects, along with Southern Company Gas' existing pipelines, are intended to provide diverse sources of natural gas supplies to customers, resolve current and long-term supply planning for new capacity, enhance system reliability, and generate economic development in the areas served. The following table provides an overview of these pipeline projects.
 Miles of Pipe 
Capital Expenditures(a)
 Ownership
Percentage
   (in millions)  
Atlantic Coast Pipeline(b)
594
 $350-390 5%
PennEast Pipeline(c)
118
 $276 20%
(a)Represents Southern Company Gas' expected total capital expenditures, excluding AFUDC, at completion, which may change.
(b)In 2014, Southern Company Gas entered into a joint venture to construct and operate a natural gas pipeline that will run from West Virginia through Virginia and into eastern North Carolina to meet the region's growing demand for natural gas. The proposed pipeline project is expected to transport natural gas to customers in Virginia. In August 2017, the Atlantic Coast Pipeline received FERC approval.
(c)In 2014, Southern Company Gas entered into a joint venture to construct and operate a natural gas pipeline that will transport low-cost natural gas from the Marcellus Shale area to customers in New Jersey. Southern Company Gas believes this will alleviate takeaway constraints in the Marcellus region and help mitigate some of the price volatility experienced during recent winters. On January 19, 2018, the PennEast Pipeline received FERC approval.
Work continues with state and federal agencies to obtain the required permits to begin construction on the PennEast Pipeline. Any material delays may impact forecasted capital expenditures and the expected in-service date.
The Atlantic Coast Pipeline has experienced challenges to its permits since construction began in 2018. During the third and fourth quarters 2018, a FERC stop work order, together with delays in obtaining permits necessary for construction and construction delays due to judicial actions, impacted the cost and schedule for the project. As a result, total project cost estimates have increased from between $6.0 billion and $6.5 billion to between $7.0 billion and $7.8 billion, excluding financing costs. Southern Company Gas' share of the total project costs is 5% and Southern Company Gas' investment at December 31, 2018 totaled $83 million. The operator of the joint venture currently expects to achieve a late 2020 in-service date for at least key segments of the Atlantic Coast Pipeline, while the remainder may extend into early 2021. Southern Company Gas has evaluated the recoverability of its investment and determined there was no impairment as of December 31, 2018. Abnormal weather, work delays (including due to judicial or regulatory action), and other conditions may result in additional cost or schedule modifications, which could result in an impairment of Southern Company Gas' investment and could have a material impact on Southern Company Gas' financial statements.
The ultimate outcome of these matters cannot be determined at this time. See Notes 7 and 9 to the financial statements under "Southern Company GasEquity Method Investments" and "Guarantees," respectively, for additional information on these pipeline projects.
In August 2017, the Dalton Pipeline, which serves as an extension of the Transco pipeline system and provides additional natural gas supply to customers in Georgia, was placed in service. Southern Company Gas has a 50% ownership interest in the Dalton Pipeline. See Note 5 to the financial statements under "Joint Ownership Agreements" for additional information.
On November 16, 2018, SNG completed its purchase of Georgia Power's natural gas lateral pipeline serving Plant McDonough Units 4 through 6 at net book value, as approved by the Georgia PSC on January 1, 2016,16, 2018. SNG expects to pay $142 million to Georgia Power in the first quarter 2020. During the interim period, Georgia Power will receive a discounted shipping rate to reflect the delayed consideration. Southern Company Gas' portion of the expected capital expenditures for the purchase of this pipeline and additional construction is $122 million.
Regulatory Matters
Utility Regulation and Rate Design
The natural gas distribution utilities are subject to regulations and oversight by their respective state regulatory agencies. Rates charged to customers vary according to customer class (residential, commercial, or industrial) and rate jurisdiction. These agencies approve rates designed to provide the opportunity to generate revenues to recover all prudently-incurred costs, including a return on rate base sufficient to pay interest on debt and provide a reasonable ROE. Rate base generally consists of the original

MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS (continued)
Southern Company Gas and Subsidiary Companies 2018 Annual Report


cost of the utility plant in service, working capital, and certain other assets, less accumulated depreciation on the utility plant in service and net deferred income tax liabilities, and may include certain other additions or deductions.
The natural gas market for Atlanta Gas Light was deregulated in 1997. Accordingly, Marketers, rather than a traditional utility, sell natural gas to end-use customers in Georgia and handle customer billing functions. The Marketers file their rates monthly with the Georgia PSC. As a result of operating in a deregulated environment, Atlanta Gas Light's role includes:
distributing natural gas for Marketers;
constructing, operating, and maintaining the gas system infrastructure, including responding to customer service calls and leaks;
reading meters and maintaining underlying customer premise information for Marketers; and
planning and contracting for capacity on interstate transportation and storage systems.
Atlanta Gas Light earns revenue by charging rates to its customers based primarily on monthly fixed charges that are set by the Georgia PSC and adjusted periodically. The Marketers add these fixed charges when billing customers. This mechanism, called a straight-fixed-variable rate design, minimizes the seasonality of Atlanta Gas Light's revenues since the monthly fixed charge is not volumetric or directly weather dependent.
Georgia Rate Adjustment Mechanism (GRAM)
In February 2017, the Georgia PSC approved changesGRAM and a $20 million increase in annual base rate revenues for Atlanta Gas Light, effective March 1, 2017. GRAM adjusts base rates annually, up or down, using an earnings band based on the previously approved ROE of 10.75% and does not collect revenue through special riders and surcharges. Atlanta Gas Light adjusts rates up to the Company's hedginglower end of the band of 10.55% and adjusts rates down to the higher end of the band of 10.95%. Various infrastructure programs previously authorized by the Georgia PSC under Atlanta Gas Light's STRIDE program allowing itincluding the Integrated Vintage Plastic Replacement Program (i-VPR) to replace aging plastic pipe and the Integrated System Reinforcement Program (i-SRP) to upgrade Atlanta Gas Light's distribution system and LNG facilities in Georgia continue under GRAM and the recovery of and return on the infrastructure program investments are included in annual base rate adjustments. The Georgia PSC reviews Atlanta Gas Light's performance annually under GRAM. See "Rate Proceedings" herein for additional information.
Pursuant to the GRAM approval, Atlanta Gas Light and the staff of the Georgia PSC agreed to a variation of the Integrated Customer Growth Program to extend pipeline facilities to serve customers in areas without pipeline access and create new economic development opportunities in Georgia, which was formerly part of the STRIDE program. As a result, a new tariff was created, effective October 10, 2017, to provide up to $15 million annually for Atlanta Gas Light to commit to strategic economic development projects. Projects under this tariff must be approved by the Georgia PSC.
PRP
In 2015, Atlanta Gas Light began recovering incremental PRP surcharge amounts through three phased-in increases in addition to its already existing PRP surcharge amount, which was established to address recovery of the unrecovered PRP balance of $144 million and the estimated amounts to be earned under the program through 2025. The unrecovered balance is the result of the continued revenue requirement earned under the program offset by the existing and incremental PRP surcharges. The under recovered balance at December 31, 2018 was $171 million, including $95 million of unrecognized equity return. The PRP surcharge will remain in effect until the earlier of the full recovery of the under recovered amount or December 31, 2025. See "Rate Proceedings" and "Unrecognized Ratemaking Amounts" herein for additional information.
With the exception of Atlanta Gas Light, the earnings of the natural gas distribution utilities can be affected by customer consumption patterns that are largely a function of weather conditions and price levels for natural gas. Specifically, customer demand substantially increases during the Heating Season when natural gas is used for heating purposes. Southern Company Gas has various mechanisms, such as weather normalization mechanisms and weather derivative instruments, that limit exposure to weather changes within typical ranges in these utilities' respective service territories.
With the exception of Atlanta Gas Light, the natural gas distribution utilities are authorized by the relevant regulatory agencies in the states in which they serve to use natural gas cost recovery mechanisms that adjust rates to reflect changes in the wholesale cost of natural gas and ensure recovery of all costs prudently incurred in purchasing natural gas for customers. Since Atlanta Gas Light does not sell natural gas directly to its end-use customers, it does not utilize a traditional natural gas cost recovery mechanism. However, Atlanta Gas Light does maintain natural gas inventory for the Marketers in Georgia and recovers the cost through recovery mechanisms approved by the Georgia PSC specific to Georgia's deregulated market. In addition to natural gas recovery mechanisms, there are other cost recovery mechanisms, such as regulatory riders, which vary by utility but allow recovery of certain costs, such as those related to infrastructure replacement programs as well as environmental remediation and

MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS (continued)
Southern Company Gas and Subsidiary Companies 2018 Annual Report


energy efficiency plans. In traditional rate designs, utilities recover a significant portion of the fixed customer service and pipeline infrastructure costs based on assumed natural gas volumes used by customers. With the exception of Nicor Gas, the utilities have decoupled regulatory mechanisms that Southern Company Gas believes encourage conservation by separating the recoverable amount of these fixed costs from the amounts of natural gas used by customers. Natural gas cost recovery revenues are adjusted for differences in actual recoverable natural gas costs and amounts billed in current regulated rates. Changes in the billing factor will not have a significant effect on Southern Company Gas' revenues or net income, but will affect cash flows. See Note 2 to the financial statements under "Southern Company Gas" for additional information.
The following table provides regulatory information for Southern Company Gas' natural gas distribution utilities:
 Nicor Gas Atlanta Gas Light Virginia Natural Gas Chattanooga Gas
Authorized ROE(a)(b)
9.80% 10.75% 9.50% 9.80%
Weather normalization mechanisms(c)
    ü ü
Decoupled, including straight-fixed-variable rates(d)
  ü ü 
Regulatory infrastructure program rates(e)(f)
ü 
 ü  
Bad debt rider(g)
ü   ü ü
Energy efficiency plan(h)
ü   ü 
Year of last rate decision(i)
2018 2018 2018 2018
(a)Represents the authorized ROE, or the midpoint of the authorized ROE range, at December 31, 2018.
(b)The authorized ROE range for Atlanta Gas Light and Virginia Natural Gas was 10.55% - 10.95% and 9.00% - 10.00%, respectively, at December 31, 2018.
(c)Regulatory mechanisms that allow recovery of costs in the event of unseasonal weather, but are not direct offsets to the potential impacts on earnings of weather and customer consumption. These mechanisms are designed to help stabilize operating results by increasing base rate amounts charged to customers when weather is warmer than normal and decreasing amounts charged when weather is colder than normal.
(d)Recovery of fixed customer service costs separately from assumed natural gas volumes used by customers.
(e)Programs that update or expand distribution systems and LNG facilities.
(f)
Recovery of program costs at Atlanta Gas Light was incorporated in GRAM, which the Georgia PSC approved in February 2017. See "Infrastructure Replacement Programs and Capital ProjectsAtlanta Gas Light" herein for additional information.
(g)The recovery (refund) of bad debt expense over (under) an established benchmark expense. Nicor Gas, Virginia Natural Gas, and Chattanooga Gas recover the gas portion of bad debt expense through their purchased gas adjustment mechanisms.
(h)Recovery of costs associated with plans to achieve specified energy savings goals.
(i)
See "Rate Proceedings" herein and Note 2 to the financial statements under "Southern Company GasRate Proceedings" for additional information.
Infrastructure Replacement Programs and Capital Projects
Southern Company Gas continues to focus on capital discipline and cost control while pursuing projects and initiatives that are expected to have current and future benefits to customers, provide an arrayappropriate return on invested capital, and help ensure the safety and reliability of the utility infrastructure. In addition to capital expenditures recovered through base rates by each of the natural gas distribution utilities, Nicor Gas and Virginia Natural Gas have separate rate riders that provide timely recovery of capital expenditures for specific infrastructure replacement programs. Total capital expenditures incurred during 2018 for gas distribution operations were $1.4 billion, including $97 million related to Elizabethtown Gas, Elkton Gas, and Florida City Gas, which were sold in 2018.
The following table and discussions provide updates on the infrastructure replacement programs and capital projects at the natural gas distribution utilities at December 31, 2018. These programs are risk-based and designed to update and replace cast iron, bare steel, and mid-vintage plastic materials or expand Southern Company Gas' distribution systems to improve reliability and meet operational flexibility and growth. The anticipated expenditures for these programs in 2019 are quantified in the discussion below.

MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS (continued)
Southern Company Gas and Subsidiary Companies 2018 Annual Report


Utility Program Recovery Expenditures in 2018 Expenditures Since Project Inception Pipe
Installed Since
Project Inception
 Scope of
Program
 Program Duration Last
Year of Program
      (in millions) (miles) (miles) (years)  
Nicor Gas 
Investing in Illinois(*)
 Rider $409
 $1,316
 706
 1,500
 9
 2023
Virginia Natural Gas Steps to Advance Virginia's Energy (SAVE and SAVE II) Rider 40
 196
 287
 496
 10
 2021
Total     $449
 $1,512
 993
 1,996
    
(*)Includes replacement of pipes, compressors, and transmission mains along with other improvements such as new meters. Scope of program miles is an estimate and subject to change.
Nicor Gas
In 2013, Illinois enacted legislation that allows Nicor Gas to provide more widespread safety and reliability enhancements to its distribution system. The legislation stipulates that rate increases to customers as a result of any infrastructure investments shall not exceed a cumulative annual average of 4.0% or, in any given year, 5.5% of base rate revenues. In 2014, the Illinois Commission approved the nine-year regulatory infrastructure program, Investing in Illinois, subject to annual review. Nicor Gas expects to place into service $373 million of qualifying projects under Investing in Illinois in 2019.
In conjunction with the base rate case order issued by the Illinois Commission on January 31, 2018, Nicor Gas is recovering program costs incurred prior to December 31, 2017 through base rates. Nicor Gas has requested that the program costs incurred subsequent to December 31, 2017, which are currently being recovered through a separate rider, be addressed in the base rate case filed November 9, 2018. See "Rate Proceedings" herein for additional information.
Virginia Natural Gas
In 2012, the Virginia Commission approved the SAVE program, an accelerated infrastructure replacement program, to be completed over a five-year period. In 2016, the Virginia Commission approved an extension to the SAVE program for Virginia Natural Gas to replace more than 200 miles of aging pipeline infrastructure and invest up to $30 million in 2016 and up to $35 million annually through 2021. Virginia Natural Gas expects to invest $35 million under this program in 2019.
The SAVE program is subject to annual review by the Virginia Commission. In conjunction with the base rate case order issued by the Virginia Commission in December 2017, Virginia Natural Gas is recovering program costs incurred prior to September 1, 2017 through base rates. Program costs incurred subsequent to September 1, 2017 are currently recovered through a separate rider and are subject to future base rate case proceedings.
Atlanta Gas Light
As discussed previously under "Utility Regulation and Rate Design," i-SRP and i-VPR will continue under GRAM and the recovery of and return on current and future capital investments under the STRIDE program will be included in annual base rate adjustments.
The orders for the STRIDE program provide for recovery of all prudent costs incurred in the performance of the program. Atlanta Gas Light will recover from end-use customers, through billings to Marketers, the costs related to the program, net of any related cost savings. The regulatory asset represents incurred program costs that will be collected through GRAM. The future expected costs to be recovered through rates related to allowed, but not incurred, costs are recognized in an unrecognized ratemaking amount that is not reflected on the balance sheets. This allowed cost is primarily the equity return on the capital investment under the program. See "Unrecognized Ratemaking Amounts"herein for additional information.
Atlanta Gas Light capitalizes and depreciates the capital expenditure costs incurred from the STRIDE programs over the life of the assets. Operations and maintenance costs are expensed as incurred. Recoveries, which are recorded as revenue, are based on a formula that allows Atlanta Gas Light to recover operations and maintenance costs in excess of those included in its current base rates, depreciation, and an allowed rate of return on capital expenditures. However, Atlanta Gas Light is allowed the recovery of carrying costs on the under recovered balance resulting from the timing difference.

MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS (continued)
Southern Company Gas and Subsidiary Companies 2018 Annual Report


Rate Proceedings
Nicor Gas
On January 31, 2018, the Illinois Commission approved a $137 million increase in annual base rate revenues, including $93 million related to the recovery of investments under the Investing in Illinois program, effective February 8, 2018, based on a ROE of 9.8%.
On April 19, 2018, the Illinois Commission approved Nicor Gas' variable income tax adjustment rider. This rider provides for refund or recovery of changes in income tax expense that result from income tax rates that differ from those used in Nicor Gas' last rate case. Customer refunds, via bill credits, related to the impacts of the Tax Reform Legislation from January 25, 2018 through May 4, 2018 began on July 1, 2018 and are expected to conclude in the second quarter 2019.
On May 2, 2018, the Illinois Commission approved Nicor Gas' rehearing request for revised base rates to incorporate the reduction in the federal income tax rate as a result of the Tax Reform Legislation. The resulting decrease of approximately $44 million in annual base rate revenues became effective May 5, 2018. Nicor Gas' previously-authorized capital structure and ROE of 9.80% were not addressed in the rehearing and remain unchanged.
On November 9, 2018, Nicor Gas filed a general base rate case with the Illinois Commission requesting a $230 million increase in annual base rate revenues. The requested increase is based on a projected test year for the 12-month period ending September 30, 2020, a ROE of 10.6%, and an increase in the equity ratio from 52.0% to 54.0% to address the negative cash flow and credit metric impacts of the Tax Reform Legislation. The Illinois Commission is expected to rule on the requested increase within the 11-month statutory time limit, after which rate adjustments will be effective. The ultimate outcome of this matter cannot be determined at this time.
Atlanta Gas Light
On February 23, 2018, Atlanta Gas Light revised its annual base rate filing to reflect the impacts of the Tax Reform Legislation and requested a $16 million rate reduction in 2018. On May 15, 2018, the Georgia PSC approved a stipulation for Atlanta Gas Light's annual base rates to remain at the 2017 level for 2018 and 2019, with customer credits of $8 million in each of July 2018 and October 2018 to reflect the impacts of the Tax Reform Legislation. The Georgia PSC maintained Atlanta Gas Light's previously authorized earnings band based on a ROE between 10.55% and 10.95% and increased the allowed equity ratio by 4% to an equity ratio of 55% to address the negative cash flow and credit metric impacts of the Tax Reform Legislation. Additionally, Atlanta Gas Light is required to file a traditional base rate case on or before June 1, 2019 for rates effective January 1, 2020.
Atlanta Gas Light's recovery of the previously unrecovered PRP revenue through 2014, as well as the mitigation costs associated with the PRP that were not previously included in its rates, were included in GRAM. In connection with the GRAM approval, the last monthly PRP surcharge increase became effective March 1, 2017.
Virginia Natural Gas
On December 17, 2018, the Virginia Commission approved Virginia Natural Gas' annual information form filing, which reduced annual base rates by $14 million effective January 1, 2019 due to lower tax expense as a result of the lower corporate income tax rate and the impact of the flowback of excess deferred income taxes. This approval also requires Virginia Natural Gas to issue customer refunds, via bill credits, for the entire $14 million which was deferred as a regulatory liability, current, on the balance sheet at December 31, 2018. These customer refunds are expected to be completed in the first quarter 2019.
Affiliate Asset Management Agreements
With the exception of Nicor Gas, the natural gas distribution utilities use asset management agreements with an affiliate, Sequent, for the primary purpose of reducing utility customers' gas cost recovery rates through payments to the utilities by Sequent. For Atlanta Gas Light, these payments are controlled by the Georgia PSC and are utilized for infrastructure improvements and to fund heating assistance programs, rather than as a reduction to gas cost recovery rates. Under these asset management agreements, Sequent supplies natural gas to the utility and markets available pipeline and storage capacity to improve the overall cost of supplying gas to the utility customers. Currently, the natural gas distribution utilities primarily purchase their gas from Sequent. The purchase agreements require Sequent to provide firm gas to the natural gas distribution utilities, but these natural gas distribution utilities maintain the right and ability to make their own long-term supply arrangements if they believe it is in the best interest of their customers.
Upon closing the sales of Elizabethtown Gas and Elkton Gas, an affiliate of South Jersey Industries, Inc. assumed the asset management agreements with wholesale gas services for Elizabethtown Gas and Elkton Gas. The sale of Pivotal Utility Holdings to NextEra Energy did not impact the asset management agreement between Sequent and Florida City Gas, which will remain in

MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS (continued)
Southern Company Gas and Subsidiary Companies 2018 Annual Report


effect until March 31, 2019. See Note 15 to the financial statements under "Southern Company Gas " for additional information on these dispositions.
Each agreement provides for Sequent to make payments to the natural gas distribution utility through either an annual minimum guarantee within a profit sharing structure, a profit sharing structure without an annual minimum guarantee, or a fixed fee. From the inception of these agreements in 2001 through December 31, 2018, Sequent made sharing payments to the natural gas distribution utilities under these agreements totaling $425 million.
The following table provides payments made by Sequent to the remaining natural gas distribution utilities under these agreements during the last three years:
  Successor  Predecessor   
  Year Ended December 31, Year Ended December 31, July 1, 2016 through December 31,  January 1, 2016
through
June 30,
   
  2018 2017 2016  2016  Expiration Date
  (in millions)  (in millions)   
Virginia Natural Gas $11
 $6
 $2
  $9
  March 2019
Atlanta Gas Light 9
 4
 1
  6
  March 2020
Chattanooga Gas 1
 1
 
  1
  March 2021
Total(*)
 $21
 $11
 $3
  $16
   
(*)
Payments made to Elizabethtown Gas, Elkton Gas, and Florida City Gas, which were sold in July 2018, were $14 million and $12 million for the successor years ended December 31, 2018 and 2017, respectively, $3 million for the successor period of July 1, 2016 through December 31, 2016, and $13 million for the predecessor period of January 1, 2016 through June 30, 2016. See Note 15 to the financial statements under "Southern Company Gas" for additional information on these dispositions.
energySMART
The Illinois Commission approved Nicor Gas' energySMART program, which includes energy efficiency program offerings and therm reduction goals. Through December 31, 2017, Nicor Gas spent $107 million of the initial authorized expenditure of $113 million. A new program began on January 1, 2018, with an additional authorized expenditure of $160 million through 2021. Through December 31, 2018, Nicor Gas had spent $29 million.
Unrecognized Ratemaking Amounts
The following table illustrates Southern Company Gas' authorized ratemaking amounts that are not recognized on its balance sheets. These amounts are primarily composed of an allowed equity rate of return on assets associated with certain regulatory infrastructure programs. These amounts will be recognized as revenues in Southern Company Gas' financial statements in the periods they are billable to customers, the majority of which will be recovered by 2025.
 December 31, 2018 December 31, 2017
 (in millions)
Atlanta Gas Light$95
 $104
Virginia Natural Gas11
 11
Nicor Gas4
 2
Total$110
 $117
Income Tax Matters
Federal Tax Reform Legislation
In December 2017, the Tax Reform Legislation was signed into law and became effective on January 1, 2018. The Tax Reform Legislation, among other things, reduced the federal corporate income tax rate to 21%, retained normalization provisions for public utility property and existing renewable energy incentives, and repealed the corporate alternative minimum tax. In addition, under the Tax Reform Legislation, net operating losses (NOL) generated after December 31, 2017 can no longer be carried back to previous tax years but can be carried forward indefinitely, with utilization limited to 80% of taxable income of the subsequent tax year. The projected reduction of Southern Company's consolidated income tax liability resulting from the tax rate reduction

MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS (continued)
Southern Company Gas and Subsidiary Companies 2018 Annual Report


also delays the expected utilization of existing tax credit carryforwards. See Note 10 to the financial statements for information on Southern Company's joint consolidated income tax allocation agreement.
Following the enactment of the Tax Reform Legislation, the SEC staff issued Staff Accounting Bulletin 118 – "Income Tax Accounting Implications of the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act" (SAB 118), which provided for a measurement period of up to one year from the enactment date to complete accounting under GAAP for the tax effects of the legislation. Due to the complex and comprehensive nature of the enacted tax law changes and their application under GAAP, Southern Company Gas considered all amounts recorded in the financial statements as a result of the Tax Reform Legislation "provisional" as discussed in SAB 118 and subject to revision prior to filing its 2017 tax return in the fourth quarter 2018. Southern Company Gas recognized tax benefits of $3 million and tax expense of $93 million in 2018 and 2017, respectively, for a total net tax expense of $90 million as a result of the Tax Reform Legislation. In addition, in total, Southern Company Gas recorded a $781 million increase in regulatory liabilities as a result of the Tax Reform Legislation and $4 million of stranded excess deferred tax balances in AOCI at December 31, 2017 were adjusted through retained earnings in 2018. As of December 31, 2018, Southern Company Gas considered the measurement of impacts from the Tax Reform Legislation on deferred income tax assets and liabilities, primarily due to the impact of the reduction of the corporate income tax rate, to be complete.
However, the IRS continues to issue regulations that provide further interpretation and guidance on the law and each state's adoption of the provisions contained in the Tax Reform Legislation remains uncertain. In addition, the regulatory treatment of certain impacts of the Tax Reform Legislation is subject to the discretion of the FERC and the relevant state regulatory bodies. The ultimate impact of these matters cannot be determined at this time. See Note 2 to the financial statements under "Southern Company Gas – Rate Proceedings" for additional information on the natural gas distribution utilities' rate filings to reflect the impacts of the Tax Reform Legislation. Also see FINANCIAL CONDITION AND LIQUIDITY – "Credit Rating Risk" herein and Note 10 to the financial statements under "Current and Deferred Income Taxes" for additional information.
Bonus Depreciation
Under the Tax Reform Legislation, projects with binding contracts prior to September 28, 2017 and placed in service after September 27, 2017 remain eligible for bonus depreciation under the PATH Act. The PATH Act allowed for 50% bonus depreciation for 2015 through 2017, 40% bonus depreciation for 2018, and 30% bonus depreciation for 2019 and certain long-lived assets placed in service in 2020. Based on provisional estimates, bonus depreciation is expected to result in positive cash flows of approximately $40 million for the 2018 tax year and approximately $20 million for the 2019 tax year. See Note 10 to the financial statements under "Current and Deferred Income Taxes" for additional information. The ultimate outcome of this matter cannot be determined at this time.
Other Matters
Southern Company Gas is involved in various other matters being litigated and regulatory matters that could affect future earnings. In addition, Southern Company Gas is subject to certain claims and legal actions arising in the ordinary course of business.
Southern Company Gas is involved in litigation relating to an incident that occurred in one of its prior service territories that resulted in several deaths, injuries, and property damage. Southern Company Gas has resolved all claims for personal injuries or death, but it is continuing to defend litigation seeking to recover alleged property damages. Southern Company Gas has insurance that provides full coverage of the expected financial exposure in excess of $11 million per incident. During the successor period ended December 31, 2016, Southern Company Gas recorded reserves for substantially all of its potential exposure from these cases.
The ultimate outcome of this matter and such pending or potential litigation or regulatory matters cannot be predicted at this time; however, for current proceedings not specifically reported herein or in Notes 2 and 3 to the financial statements, management does not anticipate that the ultimate liabilities, if any, arising from such current proceedings would have a material effect on Southern Company Gas' financial statements. See Notes 2 and 3 to the financial statements for a discussion of various other contingencies, regulatory matters, and other matters being litigated which may affect future earnings potential.
Southern Company Gas owns a 50% interest in a LNG liquefaction and storage facility in Jacksonville, Florida, which was placed in service in October 2018. The facility, outfitted with a 2.0 million gallon storage tank with the capacity to produce in excess of 120,000 gallons of LNG per day, is not expected to have a material impact on Southern Company Gas' 2019 financial statements.
A wholly-owned subsidiary of Southern Company Gas owns and operates a natural gas storage facility consisting of two salt dome caverns in Louisiana. Periodic integrity tests are required in accordance with rules of the Louisiana Department of Natural Resources (DNR). In August 2017, in connection with an ongoing integrity project, updated seismic mapping indicated the proximity of one of the caverns to the edge of the salt dome may be less than the required minimum and could result in Southern

MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS (continued)
Southern Company Gas and Subsidiary Companies 2018 Annual Report


Company Gas retiring the cavern early. At December 31, 2018, the facility's property, plant, and equipment had a net book value of $109 million, of which the cavern itself represents approximately 20%. A potential early retirement of this cavern is dependent upon several factors including compliance with an order from the Louisiana DNR detailing the requirements to place the cavern back in service, which includes, among other things, obtaining core samples to determine the composition of the sheath surrounding the edge of the salt dome.
The cavern continues to maintain its pressures and overall structural integrity. Southern Company Gas intends to monitor the cavern and comply with the Louisiana DNR order through 2020 and place the cavern back in service in 2021. These events were considered in connection with Southern Company Gas' annual long-lived asset impairment analysis, which determined there was no impairment as of December 31, 2018. Any changes in results of monitoring activities, rates at which expiring capacity contracts are re-contracted, timing of placing the cavern back in service, or Louisiana DNR requirements could trigger impairment. Further, early retirement of the cavern could trigger impairment of other long-lived assets associated with the natural gas storage facility. The ultimate outcome of this matter cannot be determined at this time, but could have a material impact on Southern Company Gas' financial statements.
Effective January 1, 2018, Southern Company Gas conformed its paid time off policy to align with Southern Company. Under the new policy, paid time off days are vested by the employee on the first day of each year and will continue to be recovered through rates on an as-paid basis. As a result, Southern Company Gas accrued $21 million as of January 1, 2018, of which $9 million was recorded as regulatory assets by the natural gas distribution utilities. See Note 2 to the financial statements under "Southern Company Gas" for additional information.
ACCOUNTING POLICIES
Application of Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates
Southern Company Gas prepares its financial statements in accordance with GAAP. Significant accounting policies are described in Notes 1, 5, and 6 to the financial statements. In the application of these policies, certain estimates are made that may have a material impact on Southern Company Gas' results of operations and related disclosures. Different assumptions and measurements could produce estimates that are significantly different from those recorded in the financial statements. Senior management has reviewed and discussed the following critical accounting policies and estimates with the Audit Committee of Southern Company's Board of Directors.
Utility Regulation
The natural gas distribution utilities comprised approximately 82% of Southern Company Gas' total operating revenues for 2018 and are subject to rate regulation by their respective state regulatory agencies, which set the rates utilities are permitted to charge customers based on allowable costs, including a reasonable ROE. As a result, the natural gas distribution utilities apply accounting standards which require the financial statements to reflect the effects of rate regulation. Through the ratemaking process, the regulators may require the inclusion of costs or revenues in periods different than when they would be recognized by a non-regulated company. This treatment may result in the deferral of expenses and the recording of related regulatory assets based on anticipated future recovery through rates or the deferral of gains or creation of liabilities and the recording of related regulatory liabilities. The application of the accounting standards has a further effect on Southern Company Gas' financial statements as a result of the estimates of allowable costs used in the ratemaking process. These estimates may differ from those actually incurred by the natural gas distribution utilities; therefore, the accounting estimates inherent in specific costs such as depreciation and pension and other postretirement benefits have less of a direct impact on Southern Company Gas' results of operations and financial condition than they would on a non-regulated company.
As reflected in Note 2 to the financial statements under "Southern Company GasRegulatory Assets and Liabilities," significant regulatory assets and liabilities have been recorded. Management reviews the ultimate recoverability of these regulatory assets and any requirement to refund these regulatory liabilities based on applicable regulatory guidelines and GAAP. However, adverse legislative, judicial, or regulatory actions could materially impact the amounts of such regulatory assets and liabilities and could adversely impact Southern Company Gas' financial statements.
Accounting for Income Taxes
The consolidated income tax provision and deferred income tax assets and liabilities, as well as any unrecognized tax benefits and valuation allowances, require significant judgment and estimates. These estimates are supported by historical tax return data, reasonable projections of taxable income, and interpretations of applicable tax laws and regulations across multiple taxing jurisdictions. The effective tax rate reflects the statutory tax rates and calculated apportionments for the many states in which Southern Company Gas operates.

MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS (continued)
Southern Company Gas and Subsidiary Companies 2018 Annual Report


On behalf of Southern Company Gas, Southern Company files a consolidated federal income tax return and various state income tax returns, some of which are combined or unitary. Under a joint consolidated income tax allocation agreement, each Southern Company subsidiary's current and deferred tax expense is computed on a stand-alone basis and no subsidiary is allocated more current expense than would be paid if it filed a separate income tax return. Certain deductions and credits can be limited at the consolidated or combined level resulting in NOL and tax credit carryforwards that would not otherwise result on a stand-alone basis. Utilization of NOL carryforwards and the assessment of valuation allowances are based on significant judgment and extensive analysis of Southern Company Gas', as well as Southern Company's, current financial position and result of operations, including currently available information about future years, to estimate when future taxable income will be realized.
Current and deferred state income tax liabilities and assets are estimated based on laws of multiple states that determine the income to be apportioned to their jurisdictions. States utilize various formulas to calculate the apportionment of taxable income, primarily using sales, assets, or payroll within the jurisdiction compared to the consolidated totals. In addition, each state varies as to whether a stand-alone, combined, or unitary filing methodology is required. The calculation of deferred state taxes considers apportionment factors and filing methodologies that are expected to apply in future years. The apportionments and methodologies which are ultimately finalized in a manner inconsistent with expectations could have a material effect on Southern Company Gas' financial statements.
Given the significant judgment involved in estimating NOL carryforwards and tax credit carryforwards and multi-state apportionments, Southern Company Gas considers state deferred income tax liabilities and assets to be critical accounting estimates.
Assessment of Assets
Goodwill
Southern Company Gas does not amortize its goodwill, but tests it annually for impairment at the reporting unit level during the fourth quarter or more frequently if impairment indicators arise. These indicators include, but are not limited to, a significant change in operating performance, the business climate, legal or regulatory factors, or a planned sale or disposition of a significant portion of the business. A reporting unit is the operating segment, or a business one level below the operating segment (a component), if discrete financial information is prepared and regularly reviewed by management. Components are aggregated if they have similar economic characteristics.
As part of Southern Company Gas' impairment test, Southern Company Gas may perform an initial qualitative assessment to determine whether it is more likely than not that the fair value of each reporting unit is less than its carrying amount before applying the quantitative goodwill impairment test. If Southern Company Gas elects to perform the qualitative assessment, it evaluates relevant events and circumstances, including but not limited to, macroeconomic conditions, industry and market conditions, cost factors, financial performance, entity specific events, and events specific to each reporting unit. If Southern Company Gas determines that it is more likely than not that the fair value of a reporting unit is less than its carrying amount, or it elects not to perform a qualitative assessment, it compares the fair value of the reporting unit to its carrying value to determine if the fair value is greater than its carrying value. Under ASU No. 2017-04, which was adopted effective January 1, 2018, any goodwill impairment loss will be measured as the excess of a reporting unit's carrying amount over its fair value.
For the 2018 and 2016 annual impairment tests, Southern Company Gas performed the qualitative assessment and determined that it was more likely than not that the fair value of all of its reporting units with goodwill exceeded their carrying amounts, and therefore no quantitative analysis was required. For the 2017 annual impairment test, Southern Company Gas performed the quantitative assessment, which resulted in the fair value of all of its reporting units that have goodwill exceeding their carrying value. In the first quarter 2018, Southern Company Gas recorded a $42 million impairment charge in contemplation of the sale of Pivotal Home Solutions.
As the determination of an asset's fair value and useful life involves management making certain estimates and because these estimates form the basis for the determination of whether or not an impairment charge should be recorded, Southern Company Gas considers these estimates to be critical accounting estimates.
See Note 1 to the financial statements under "Recently Adopted Accounting StandardsOther" for information on Southern Company Gas' adoption of ASU No. 2017-04.
Long-Lived Assets
Southern Company Gas depreciates or amortizes its long-lived and intangible assets over their estimated useful lives. Southern Company Gas assesses its long-lived and intangible assets for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that an asset's carrying amount may not be recoverable. When such events or circumstances are present, Southern Company Gas

MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS (continued)
Southern Company Gas and Subsidiary Companies 2018 Annual Report


assesses the recoverability of long-lived assets by determining whether the carrying value will be recovered through the expected future cash flows. Impairment is indicated if the carrying amount of a long-lived asset exceeds the sum of the undiscounted future cash flows expected to result from the use and eventual disposition of the asset. If impairment is indicated, Southern Company Gas records an impairment loss equal to the difference between the carrying value and the fair value of the long-lived asset.
As the determination of the expected future cash flows generated from an asset, an asset's fair value, and useful life involves management making certain estimates and because these estimates form the basis for the determination of whether or not an impairment charge should be recorded, Southern Company Gas considers these estimates to be critical accounting estimates.
See Notes 2 and 3 to the financial statements under "FERC Matters – Southern Company Gas" and "Other MattersSouthern Company Gas," respectively, for information on certain assets recently evaluated for impairment.
Derivatives and Hedging Activities
Determining whether a contract meets the definition of a derivative instrument, contains an embedded derivative requiring bifurcation, or qualifies for hedge accounting treatment is complex. The treatment of a single contract may vary from period to period depending upon accounting elections, changes in Southern Company Gas' assessment of the likelihood of future hedged transactions, or new interpretations of accounting guidance. As a result, judgment is required in determining the appropriate accounting treatment. In addition, the estimated fair value of derivative instruments may change significantly from period to period depending upon market conditions, and changes in hedge effectiveness may impact the accounting treatment.
Derivative instruments (including certain derivative instruments embedded in other contracts) are recorded on the balance sheets as either assets or liabilities measured at their fair value. If the transaction qualifies for, and is designated as, a normal purchase or normal sale, it is exempted from fair value accounting treatment and is, instead, subject to traditional accrual accounting. Southern Company Gas utilizes market data or assumptions that market participants would use in pricing the derivative asset or liability, including assumptions about risk and the risks inherent in the inputs of the valuation technique.
Changes in the derivatives' fair value are recognized concurrently in earnings unless specific hedge accounting criteria are met. If the derivatives meet those criteria, derivative gains and losses offset related results of the hedged item in the income statement in the case of a fair value hedge, or gains and losses are recorded in OCI on the balance sheets until the hedged transaction affects earnings in the case of a cash flow hedge. Additionally, a company is required to formally designate a derivative as a hedge as well as document and assess the effectiveness of derivatives associated with transactions that receive hedge accounting treatment.
Nicor Gas utilizes derivative instruments to hedge the price risk for the purchase of natural gas for customers. These derivatives are reflected at fair value and are not designated as accounting hedges. Realized gains or losses on such instruments are included in the cost of gas delivered and are passed through directly to customers, subject to review by the applicable state regulatory agencies, and therefore have no direct impact on earnings. Unrealized changes in the fair value of these derivative instruments are deferred as regulatory assets or liabilities. Prior to its disposition, Elizabethtown Gas utilized the same policy.
Southern Company Gas uses derivative instruments primarily to reduce the impact to its results of operations due to the risk of changes in the price of natural gas and to a lesser extent Southern Company Gas hedges against warmer-than-normal weather and interest rates. The fair value of natural gas derivative instruments used to manage exposure to changing natural gas prices reflects the estimated amounts that Southern Company Gas would receive or pay to terminate or close the contracts at the reporting date, taking into account the current unrealized gains or losses on open contracts. For derivatives utilized at gas marketing services and wholesale gas services that are not designated as accounting hedges, changes in fair value are reported as gains or losses in Southern Company Gas' results of operations in the period of change. Gas marketing services records derivative gains or losses arising from cash flow hedges in OCI and reclassifies them into earnings in the same period that the underlying hedged item is recognized in earnings.
Southern Company Gas classifies derivative assets and liabilities based on the lowest level of input that is significant to the fair value measurement. The assessment of the significance of a particular input to the fair value measurement requires judgment and may affect the valuation of fair value assets and liabilities and their placement within the fair value hierarchy. The determination of the fair value of the derivative instruments incorporates various required factors. These factors include:
the creditworthiness of the counterparties involved and the impact of credit enhancements (such as cash deposits and letters of credit);
events specific to a 48-monthgiven counterparty; and
the impact of Southern Company Gas' nonperformance risk on its liabilities.

MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS (continued)
Southern Company Gas and Subsidiary Companies 2018 Annual Report


If there is a significant change in the underlying market prices or pricing assumptions Southern Company Gas uses in pricing its derivative assets or liabilities, Southern Company Gas may experience a significant impact on its financial position, results of operations, and cash flows. See Note 14 to the financial statements for additional information.
Given the assumptions used in pricing the derivative asset or liability, Southern Company Gas considers the valuation of derivative assets and liabilities a critical accounting estimate. See FINANCIAL CONDITION AND LIQUIDITY – "Market Price Risk" herein for more information.
Pension and Other Postretirement Benefits
Southern Company Gas' calculation of pension and other postretirement benefits expense is dependent on a number of assumptions. These assumptions include discount rates, healthcare cost trend rates, expected long-term return on plan assets, mortality rates, expected salary and wage increases, and other factors. Components of pension and other postretirement benefits expense include interest and service cost on the pension and other postretirement benefit plans, expected return on plan assets, and amortization of certain unrecognized costs and obligations. Actual results that differ from the assumptions utilized are accumulated and amortized over future periods and, therefore, generally affect recognized expense and the recorded obligation in future periods. While Southern Company Gas believes that the assumptions used are appropriate, differences in actual experience or significant changes in assumptions would affect its pension and other postretirement benefit costs and obligations.
Key elements in determining Southern Company Gas' pension and other postretirement benefit expense are the expected long-term return on plan assets and the discount rate used to measure the benefit plan obligations and the periodic benefit plan expense for future periods. The expected long-term return on pension and other postretirement benefit plan assets is based on Southern Company's investment strategy, historical experience, and expectations for long-term rates of return that consider external actuarial advice. Southern Company determines the long-term return on plan assets by applying the long-term rate of expected returns on various asset classes to Southern Company's target asset allocation. For purposes of determining Southern Company Gas' liability related to the pension and other postretirement benefit plans, Southern Company discounts the future related cash flows using a single-point discount rate developed from the weighted average of market-observed yields for high quality fixed income securities with maturities that correspond to expected benefit payments.
A 25 basis point change in any significant assumption (discount rate, salary increases, or long-term rate of return on plan assets) would result in a $3 million or less change in total annual benefit expense, a $30 million or less change in the projected obligation for the pension plan, and a $6 million or less change in the projected obligation for other post retirement benefit plans.
See Note 11 to the financial statements for additional information regarding pension and other postretirement benefits.
Contingent Obligations
Southern Company Gas is subject to a number of federal and state laws and regulations as well as other factors and conditions that subject it to environmental, litigation, and other risks. See FUTURE EARNINGS POTENTIAL herein and Notes 2 and 3 to the financial statements for more information regarding certain of these contingencies. Southern Company Gas periodically evaluates its exposure to such risks and records reserves for those matters where a non-tax-related loss is considered probable and reasonably estimable. The adequacy of reserves can be significantly affected by external events or conditions that can be unpredictable; thus, the ultimate outcome of such matters could materially affect Southern Company Gas' results of operations, cash flows, or financial condition.
Recently Issued Accounting Standards
See Note 1 to the financial statements under "Recently Adopted Accounting Standards" for additional information.
In 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-02, Leases (Topic 842) (ASU 2016-02). ASU 2016-02 requires lessees to recognize on the balance sheet a lease liability and a right-of-use asset for all leases. ASU 2016-02 also changes the recognition, measurement, and presentation of expense associated with leases and provides clarification regarding the identification of certain components of contracts that would represent a lease. The accounting required by lessors is relatively unchanged. ASU 2016-02 is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2018 and Southern Company Gas adopted the new standard effective January 1, 2019.
Southern Company Gas elected the transition methodology provided by ASU No. 2018-11, Leases (Topic 842): Targeted Improvements, whereby the requirements of ASU 2016-02 are applied on a prospective basis as of the adoption date of January 1, 2019, without restating prior periods. Southern Company Gas elected the package of practical expedients provided by ASU 2016-02 that allows prior determinations of whether existing contracts are, or contain, leases and the classification of existing leases to continue without reassessment. Additionally, Southern Company Gas applied the use-of-hindsight practical expedient in determining lease terms as of the date of adoption and elected the practical expedient that allows existing land easements not previously accounted for as leases not to be reassessed. Southern Company Gas also made accounting policy elections to account

MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS (continued)
Southern Company Gas and Subsidiary Companies 2018 Annual Report


for short-term leases in all asset classes as off-balance sheet leases and combined lease and non-lease components in the computations of lease obligations and right-of-use assets for most asset classes.
Southern Company Gas completed the implementation of a new application to track and account for its leases and updated its internal controls and accounting policies to support the accounting for leases under ASU 2016-02. Southern Company Gas completed its lease inventory and determined its most significant leases involve real estate and fleet vehicles. In the first quarter 2019, the adoption of ASU 2016-02 resulted in recording lease liabilities and right-of-use assets on Southern Company Gas' balance sheet each totaling $86 million, with no impact on Southern Company Gas' statement of income.
FINANCIAL CONDITION AND LIQUIDITY
Overview
Southern Company Gas' financial condition remained stable at December 31, 2018. Southern Company Gas' cash requirements primarily consist of funding ongoing operations, common stock dividends, capital expenditures, investments in unconsolidated subsidiaries, and debt maturities. Capital expenditures and other investing activities include investments to meet projected long-term demand requirements, to maintain existing natural gas distribution systems as well as to update and expand these systems, and to comply with environmental regulations. Operating cash flows provide a substantial portion of Southern Company Gas' cash needs. For the three-year period from 2019 through 2021, Southern Company Gas' projected common stock dividends, capital expenditures, and debt maturities are expected to exceed operating cash flows. Southern Company Gas plans to finance future cash needs in excess of its operating cash flows primarily through external securities issuances, equity contributions from Southern Company, and borrowings from financial institutions. Southern Company Gas plans to use commercial paper to manage seasonal variations in operating cash flows and other working capital needs. Southern Company Gas intends to continue to monitor its access to short-term and long-term capital markets as well as its bank credit arrangements to meet future capital and liquidity needs. See "Sources of Capital," "Financing Activities," and "Capital Requirements and Contractual Obligations" herein for additional information.
By regulation, Nicor Gas is restricted, to the extent of its retained earnings balance, in the amount it can dividend or loan to affiliates and is not permitted to make money pool loans to affiliates. At December 31, 2018, the amount of subsidiary retained earnings restricted to dividend totaled $814 million. This restriction did not impact Southern Company Gas' ability to meet its cash obligations, nor does management expect such restriction to materially impact Southern Company Gas' ability to meet its currently anticipated cash obligations.
Southern Company Gas' investments in the qualified pension plan decreased in value at December 31, 2018 as compared to December 31, 2017. There were no voluntary contributions to the qualified pension plan in 2018 and no mandatory contributions to its qualified pension plan are anticipated during 2019. See Note 11 to the financial statements for additional information.
Net cash provided from operating activities in the successor year ended 2018 totaled $764 million, a decrease of $117 million from 2017. The decrease was primarily due to higher income tax payments as a result of net taxable gains from the Southern Company Gas Dispositions, partially offset by increased volumes of natural gas sold during 2018 as a result of colder weather compared to 2017. Net cash provided from operating activities totaled $881 million for 2017, primarily due to earnings and the timing of cash receipts for the sale of natural gas inventory and vendor payments. Net cash used for operating activities was $327 million for the successor period of July 1, 2016 through December 31, 2016, primarily due to a $125 million voluntary pension contribution, a $35 million payment for the settlement of an interest rate swap, and less cash due to the timing of collecting receivables and disbursing payables. Due to the seasonal nature of its business, Southern Company Gas typically reports negative cash flows from operating activities in the second half of the year. Net cash provided from operating activities was $1.1 billion for the predecessor period of January 1, 2016 through June 30, 2016, primarily due to low volumes of natural gas sales and changes in natural gas inventory as a result of warmer weather and the timing of recovery of related gas costs and weather normalization adjustments from customers.
Net cash provided from investing activities for the successor year ended 2018 totaled $1.0 billion and was primarily due to the $2.6 billion proceeds from the Southern Company Gas Dispositions, partially offset by gross property additions primarily related to utility capital expenditures and pre-approved rider and infrastructure investments recovered through replacement programs at gas distribution operations as well as capital contributed to equity method pipeline investments partially offset by capital returned from equity method pipeline investments. Net cash used for investing activities totaled $1.6 billion for the successor year ended 2017, which reflected $1.5 billion in capital expenditures primarily due to gross property additions for infrastructure replacement programs at gas distribution operations and $145 million in capital contributions to equity method pipeline investments, partially offset by $80 million in capital returned from equity method pipeline investments. Net cash used for investing activities was $2.1 billion for the successor period of July 1, 2016 through December 31, 2016, which reflected

MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS (continued)
Southern Company Gas and Subsidiary Companies 2018 Annual Report


$1.4 billion primarily related to Southern Company Gas' acquisition of the 50% interest in SNG, and $632 million in capital expenditures. Net cash used for investing activities was $556 million for the predecessor period of January 1, 2016 through June 30, 2016 which primarily related to capital expenditures. See Note 7 to the financial statements under "Southern Company Gas" and Note 15 to the financial statements under "Southern Company Gas – Investment in SNG" for additional information.
Net cash used for financing activities for the successor year ended 2018 of $1.8 billion included payments of common stock dividends to Southern Company, return of capital to Southern Company, redemptions of gas facility revenue bonds and senior notes, and repayments of commercial paper borrowings and long-term debt, partially offset by debt issuances and capital contributions from Southern Company. Net cash provided from financing activities totaled $741 million for 2017, primarily due to $850 million in debt issuances, $262 million in net additional commercial paper borrowings, and $103 million in capital contributions from Southern Company, partially offset by $443 million in common stock dividend payments to Southern Company and $22 million in repayment of long-term debt. Net cash provided from financing activities was $2.4 billion for the successor period of July 1, 2016 through December 31, 2016, which reflected $1.1 billion of capital contributions from Southern Company, primarily used to fund Southern Company Gas' investment in SNG, $1.1 billion in net additional commercial paper borrowings, partially offset by $160 million for the purchase of the 15% noncontrolling ownership interest in SouthStar, and $900 million in proceeds from debt issuances, partially offset by $420 million in debt payments. Net cash used for financing activities was $558 million for the predecessor period of January 1, 2016 through June 30, 2016, primarily due to $896 million in net repayment of commercial paper borrowings and $125 million in repayment of long-term debt, partially offset by $600 million in debt issuances. See Note 7 to the financial statements under "Southern Company Gas" and Note 15 to the financial statements under "Southern Company Gas – Investment in SNG" for additional information.
Significant balance sheet changes at December 31, 2018 include $2.8 billion and $403 million in total assets and liabilities sold, respectively, associated with the Southern Company Gas Dispositions as described in Note 15 to the financial statements herein under "Southern Company Gas." After adjusting for these changes, other significant balance sheet changes included an increase of $1.0 billion in total property, plant, and equipment primarily due to capital expenditures for infrastructure replacement programs, a decrease of $73 million in accumulated deferred income tax liabilities primarily due to the change in the federal corporate income tax rate, partially offset by tax depreciation related to infrastructure assets placed in service, as well as the impacts of State of Illinois tax legislation, and a decrease of $108 million in long-term debt (including securities due within one year), primarily due to $200 million redemption of gas facility revenue bonds and $155 million in repayments of long-term debt, partially offset by the issuance of $300 million of first mortgage bonds at Nicor Gas. Other significant balance sheet changes include a decrease of $868 million in notes payable primarily related to a decrease in commercial paper borrowings of $840 million at Southern Company Gas Capital and $28 million at Nicor Gas. See FUTURE EARNINGS POTENTIAL – "Income Tax Matters" and FINANCIAL CONDITION AND LIQUIDITY – "Financing Activities" herein and Notes 8 and 10 to the financial statements for additional information.
Sources of Capital
Southern Company Gas plans to obtain the funds to meet its future capital needs from sources similar to those used in the past, which were primarily from operating cash flows, external securities issuances, borrowings from financial institutions, and equity contributions from Southern Company. However, the amount, type, and timing of any future financings, if needed, depend upon prevailing market conditions, regulatory approval, and other factors. With respect to the public offering of securities, Southern Company Gas (excluding its subsidiaries) and Southern Company Gas Capital file registration statements with the SEC under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended. The issuance of securities by Nicor Gas is generally subject to the approval of the Illinois Commission.
Southern Company Gas obtains separate financing without credit support from any affiliate in the Southern Company system. See Note 8 to the financial statements under "Bank Credit Arrangements" for additional information. The Southern Company system does not maintain a centralized cash or money pool. Therefore, except as described below, funds of Southern Company Gas are not commingled with funds of any other company in the Southern Company system.
Southern Company Gas maintains commercial paper programs at Southern Company Gas Capital and Nicor Gas that consist of short-term, unsecured promissory notes. Nicor Gas' commercial paper program supports its working capital needs as Nicor Gas is not permitted to make money pool loans to affiliates. All of Southern Company Gas' other subsidiaries benefit from Southern Company Gas Capital's commercial paper program.
At December 31, 2018, Southern Company Gas' current liabilities exceeded current assets by $469 million, primarily as a result of $650 million in notes payable and $357 million of securities due within one year. Southern Company Gas' current liabilities frequently exceed current assets because of commercial paper borrowings used to fund daily operations, scheduled maturities of long-term debt, and significant seasonal fluctuations in cash needs.

MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS (continued)
Southern Company Gas and Subsidiary Companies 2018 Annual Report


At December 31, 2018, Southern Company Gas had $64 million of cash and cash equivalents. Committed credit arrangements with banks at December 31, 2018 were as follows:
Company Expires 2022 Unused
  (millions)
Southern Company Gas Capital(a)
 $1,400
 $1,395
Nicor Gas 500
 500
Total(b)
 $1,900
 $1,895
(a)Southern Company Gas guarantees the obligations of Southern Company Gas Capital.
(b)Pursuant to the credit arrangement, the allocations between Southern Company Gas Capital and Nicor Gas may be adjusted.
See Note 8 to the financial statements under "Bank Credit Arrangements" for additional information.
The multi-year credit arrangement of Southern Company Gas Capital and Nicor Gas (Facility) contains a covenant that limits the debt levels and contains a cross-acceleration provision to other indebtedness (including guarantee obligations) of the applicable company. Such cross-acceleration provision to other indebtedness would trigger an event of default of the applicable company if Southern Company Gas or Nicor Gas defaulted on indebtedness, the payment of which was then accelerated. At December 31, 2018, both companies were in compliance with such covenant. The Facility does not contain a material adverse change clause at the time horizon.of borrowings.
Subject to applicable market conditions, the applicable company expects to renew or replace the Facility as needed, prior to expiration. In connection therewith, the applicable company may extend the maturity dates and/or increase or decrease the lending commitments thereunder. A portion of unused credit with banks provides liquidity support to Southern Company Gas.
Southern Company Gas has substantial cash flow from operating activities and access to capital markets, including the commercial paper programs, and financial institutions to meet liquidity needs. Southern Company Gas makes short-term borrowings primarily through commercial paper programs that have the liquidity support of the committed bank credit arrangements described above. Short-term borrowings are included in notes payable in the balance sheets.

MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS (continued)
Southern Company Gas and Subsidiary Companies 2018 Annual Report


Details of short-term borrowings were as follows:
  Short-term Debt at the End of the Period 
Short-term Debt During the Period(*)
  Amount
Outstanding
 Weighted Average Interest Rate Average
Amount Outstanding
 Weighted Average Interest Rate Maximum
Amount
Outstanding
  (in millions)   (in millions)   (in millions)
Successor – December 31, 2018:          
Commercial paper:          
Southern Company Gas Capital $403
 3.05% $489
 2.25% $1,261
Nicor Gas 247
 2.98% 123
 2.16% 275
Short-term bank debt:          
Southern Company Gas Capital 
 % 31
 2.72% 276
Total $650
 3.03% $643
 2.25%  
           
Successor – December 31, 2017:          
Commercial paper:          
Southern Company Gas Capital $1,243
 1.73% $723
 1.40% $1,243
Nicor Gas 275
 1.83% 176
 1.12% 525
Total $1,518
 1.75% $899
 1.35%  
           
Successor – December 31, 2016:          
Commercial paper:          
Southern Company Gas Capital $733
 1.09% $461
 0.79% $770
Nicor Gas 524
 0.95% 309
 0.67% 587
Total $1,257
 1.03% $770
 0.74%  
(*)Average and maximum amounts are based upon daily balances during the 12-month periods.
Southern Company Gas believes that the need for working capital can be adequately met by utilizing commercial paper programs, lines of credit, and operating cash flows.
Financing Activities
The long-term debt on Southern Company Gas' balance sheets includes both principal and non-principal components. At December 31, 2018, the non-principal components totaled $456 million, including the amount attributable to long-term debt due within one year, which consisted of the unamortized portions of the fair value adjustment recorded in purchase accounting, debt premiums, debt discounts, and debt issuance costs.
In December 2016, Southern Company Gas executed intercompany promissory notes to further allocate interest expense to its reportable segments that previously remained in the "all other" segment. These intercompany promissory notes allow Southern Company Gas to calculate net income, which is its performance measure subsequent to the Merger, at the segment level that incorporates the full impact of interest costs.
Except as otherwise described herein, Southern Company Gas and its subsidiaries used the proceeds of debt issuances for their redemptions and maturities, to pay common stock dividends, to repay short-term indebtedness, for capital expenditures, and for general corporate purposes, including working capital.
In January 2018, Southern Company Gas issued a floating rate promissory note to Southern Company in an aggregate principal amount of $100 million bearing interest based on one-month LIBOR. In March 2018, Southern Company Gas repaid this promissory note.
Prior to its sale, in the second quarter 2018, Pivotal Utility Holdings caused $200 million aggregate principal amount of gas facility revenue bonds to be redeemed. Also in the second quarter 2018, Pivotal Utility Holdings, as borrower, and Southern Company Gas, as guarantor, entered into a $181 million short-term delayed draw floating rate bank term loan bearing interest

MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS (continued)
Southern Company Gas and Subsidiary Companies 2018 Annual Report


based on one-month LIBOR, which Pivotal Utility Holdings used to repay the gas facility revenue bonds. In July 2018, Pivotal Utility Holdings repaid this short-term loan.
In May 2018, Southern Company Gas Capital borrowed $95 million pursuant to a short-term uncommitted bank credit arrangement, guaranteed by Southern Company Gas, bearing interest at a rate agreed upon by Southern Company Gas Capital and the bank from time to time and payable on no less than 30 days' demand by the bank. In July 2018, Southern Company Gas Capital repaid this loan.
Nicor Gas issued $300 million aggregate principal amount of first mortgage bonds in a private placement, of which $100 million was issued in August 2018 and $200 million was issued in November 2018.
In October 2018, Southern Company Gas Capital repaid at maturity $155 million aggregate principal amount of 3.50% Series B Senior Notes.
In addition to any financings that may be necessary to meet capital requirements and contractual obligations, Southern Company Gas plans to continue, when economically feasible, a program to retire higher-cost securities and replace these obligations with lower-cost capital if market conditions permit.
Credit Rating Risk
Southern Company Gas does not have any credit arrangements that would require material changes in payment schedules or terminations as a result of a credit rating downgrade.
There are certain contracts that could require collateral, but not accelerated payment, in the event of a credit rating change below BBB- and/or Baa3. These contracts are for physical gas purchases and sales and energy price risk management. The maximum potential collateral requirement under these contracts at December 31, 2018 was $30 million.
Generally, collateral may be provided by a Southern Company guaranty, letter of credit, or cash. Additionally, a credit rating downgrade could impact the ability of Southern Company Gas to access capital markets and would be likely to impact the cost at which it does so.
On September 28, 2018, Fitch assigned a negative rating outlook to the ratings of Southern Company and certain of its subsidiaries (including Southern Company Gas, Southern Company Gas Capital, and Nicor Gas).
As a result of the Tax Reform Legislation, certain financial metrics, such as the funds from operations to debt percentage, used by the credit rating agencies to assess Southern Company and its subsidiaries, including Southern Company Gas, may be negatively impacted. Southern Company Gas and its regulated subsidiaries have taken actions to mitigate the resulting impacts, which, among other alternatives, include adjusting capital structure. Absent actions by Southern Company and its subsidiaries that fully mitigate the impacts, Southern Company Gas', Southern Company Gas Capital's, and Nicor Gas' credit ratings could be negatively affected. The Georgia PSC's May 15, 2018 approval of a stipulation for Atlanta Gas Light's annual rate adjustment maintained the previously authorized earnings band and increased the equity ratio to address the negative cash flow and credit metric impacts of the Tax Reform Legislation. See Note 2 to the financial statements under "Southern Company Gas" for information on additional rate proceedings for Nicor Gas and Atlanta Gas Light expected to conclude in 2019.
Market Price Risk
Southern Company Gas is exposed to market risks, primarily commodity price risk, interest rate risk, and weather risk. Due to various cost recovery mechanisms, the natural gas distribution utilities of Southern Company Gas that sell natural gas directly to end-use customers have limited exposure to market volatility of natural gas prices. To manage the volatility attributable to these exposures, Southern Company Gas nets the exposures, where possible, to take advantage of natural offsets and enters into various derivative transactions for the remaining exposures pursuant to Southern Company Gas' policies in areas such as counterparty exposure and risk management practices. Southern Company Gas uses derivatives to buy and sell natural gas as well as for hedging purposes and mandates strict adherence to all applicable risk management policies. Derivative positions are monitored using techniques including, but not limited to, market valuation, value at risk, stress testing, and sensitivity analysis.
Certain natural gas distribution utilities of Southern Company Gas manage fuel-hedging programs implemented per the guidelines of their respective state regulatory agencies to hedge the impact of market fluctuations in natural gas prices for customers. For the weather risk associated with Nicor Gas, Southern Company Gas has a corporate weather hedging program that utilizes weather derivatives to reduce the risk of lower adjusted operating margins potentially resulting from significantly warmer-than-normal weather. In addition, certain non-regulated operations routinely utilize various types of derivative instruments to economically hedge certain commodity price and weather risks inherent in the natural gas industry. These instruments include a variety of exchange-traded and OTC energy contracts, such as forward contracts, futures contracts, options contracts, and swap agreements.

MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS (continued)
Southern Company Gas and Subsidiary Companies 2018 Annual Report


Gas marketing services and wholesale gas services also actively manage storage positions through a variety of hedging transactions for the purpose of managing exposures arising from changing natural gas prices. These hedging instruments are used to substantially protect economic margins (as spreads between wholesale and retail natural gas prices widen between periods) and thereby minimize exposure to declining operating margins. Some of these economic hedge activities may not qualify, or may not be designated, for hedge accounting treatment. Southern Company Gas had no material change in market risk exposure for the year ended December 31, 2018 when compared to the year ended December 31, 2017.
For the periods presented below, the changes in net fair value of derivative contracts were as follows:
 Successor  Predecessor
 Year Ended December 31, 2018Year Ended December 31, 2017July 1, 2016 through December 31, 2016  
January 1, 2016
through
June 30,
2016
 (in millions)  (in millions)
Contracts outstanding at beginning of period, assets (liabilities), net$(106)$8
$(54)  $75
Contracts realized or otherwise settled66
(1)18
  (77)
Current period changes(a)
(127)(113)48
  (82)
Contracts outstanding at end of period, assets (liabilities), net(167)(106)12
  (84)
Netting of cash collateral277
193
62
  120
Cash collateral and net fair value of contracts outstanding at end of period(b)
$110
$87
$74
  $36
(a)Current period changes also include the changes in fair value of new contracts entered into during the period, if any.
(b)Net fair value of derivative contracts outstanding excludes premium and intrinsic value associated with weather derivatives of $8 million and $11 million at December 31, 2018 and 2017, respectively, and includes premium and intrinsic value associated with weather derivatives of $4 million at December 31, 2016, and $5 million at June 30, 2016.
The net hedge volume of energy-related derivative contracts for natural gas positions at December 31, 2018 and 2017 were as follows:
  2018 2017
  mmBtu Volume
  (in millions)
Commodity – Natural gas 120
 300
Net Purchased / (Sold) Volume 120
 300
Southern Company Gas' derivative contracts are comprised of both long and short natural gas positions. A long position is a contract to purchase natural gas, and a short position is a contract to sell natural gas. The volume presented above represents the net of long natural gas positions of 4.16 billion mmBtu and short natural gas positions of 4.04 billion mmBtu at December 31, 2018 and the net of long natural gas positions of 3.51 billion mmBtu and short natural gas positions of 3.21 billion mmBtu at December 31, 2017.
Energy-related derivative contracts are accounted for under one of two methods:
Regulatory Hedges – Energy-related derivative contracts whichthat are designated as regulatory hedges relate primarily to the Company'sSouthern Company Gas' fuel-hedging program, whereprograms. Therefore, gains and losses are initially recorded as regulatory liabilities and assets, respectively, and then are included in fuel expensecost of natural gas as the underlying fuelgas is used in operations and ultimately recovered through the fuelrespective cost recovery mechanism.
Not Designatedclause. Certain other gains and losses on energy-related derivatives, designated as cash flow hedges (which are mainly used to hedge anticipated purchases and sales), are initially deferred in OCI before being recognized in income in the same period as the hedged transaction. Gains and losses on energy-related derivative contracts that are not designated or fail to qualify as hedges are recognized in the statements of income as incurred.
Some energy-related derivative contracts require physical delivery as opposed to financial settlement, and this type of derivative is both common and prevalent within the electricnatural gas industry. When an energy-related derivative contract is settled physically, any cumulative unrealized gain or loss is reversed and the contract price is recognized in the respective line item representing the actual price of the underlying goods being delivered.
At December 31, 2017,

MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS (continued)
Southern Company Gas and Subsidiary Companies 2018 Annual Report


Southern Company Gas uses OTC contracts that are not exchange traded but are fair valued using prices which are market observable, and thus fall into Level 2 of the net volumefair value hierarchy. See Note 13 to the financial statements for further discussion of fair value measurements.
The maturities of the energy-related derivative contracts forat December 31, 2018 were as follows:
   Fair Value Measurements
   December 31, 2018
   Maturity
 Total
Fair Value
 Year 1  Years 2 & 3 Years 4 & 5
 (in millions)
Level 1(a)
$(179) $(59) $(86) $(34)
Level 2(b)
12
 37
 
 (25)
Fair value of contracts outstanding at end of period(c)
$(167) $(22) $(86) $(59)
(a)Valued using NYMEX futures prices.
(b)Valued using basis transactions that represent the cost to transport natural gas from a NYMEX delivery point to the contract delivery point. These transactions are based on quotes obtained either through electronic trading platforms or directly from brokers.
(c)Excludes cash collateral of $277 million as well as premium and associated intrinsic value associated with weather derivatives of $8 million at December 31, 2018.
Value at Risk (VaR)
VaR is the maximum potential loss in portfolio value over a specified time period that is not expected to be exceeded within a given degree of probability. Southern Company Gas' VaR may not be comparable to that of other companies due to differences in the factors used to calculate VaR. Southern Company Gas' VaR is determined on a 95% confidence interval and a one-day holding period, which means that 95% of the time, the risk of loss in a day from a portfolio of positions is expected to be less than or equal to the amount of VaR calculated. The open exposure of Southern Company Gas is managed in accordance with established policies that limit market risk and require daily reporting of potential financial exposure to senior management. Because Southern Company Gas generally manages physical gas assets and economically protects its positions by hedging in the futures markets, Southern Company Gas' open exposure is generally mitigated. Southern Company Gas employs daily risk testing, using both VaR and stress testing, to evaluate the risk of its positions.
Southern Company Gas actively monitors open commodity positions and the resulting VaR and maintains a relatively small risk exposure as total buy volume is close to sell volume, with minimal open natural gas price risk. Based on a 95% confidence interval and employing a one-day holding period, SouthStar's portfolio of positions totaled 163 million mmBtu,for all periods presented was immaterial.
For the periods presented below, wholesale gas services had the following VaRs:
 Successor  Predecessor
 Year Ended December 31, 2018Year Ended December 31, 2017July 1, 2016 through December 31, 2016  January 1, 2016 through June 30, 2016
 (in millions)  (in millions)
Period end(*)
$6.4
$4.8
$2.3
  $1.9
Average3.7
2.0
2.0
  2.0
High(*)
11.7
4.8
2.8
  2.5
Low1.2
1.0
1.4
  1.6
(*)Increases in VaR at December 31, 2018 and 2017 were driven by significant natural gas price increases in Sequent's key markets. The natural gas price increase in 2018 was driven by an industry-wide lower-than-normal natural gas storage inventory position and colder-than-normal weather in the middle of fourth quarter 2018. The natural gas price increase in 2017 was driven by colder-than-normal weather. As weather and natural gas prices moderated subsequent to December 31, 2018 and 2017, VaR reduced to a level consistent with December 31, 2016.

MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS (continued)
Southern Company Gas and Subsidiary Companies 2018 Annual Report


Credit Risk
Gas Distribution Operations
Concentration of credit risk occurs at Atlanta Gas Light for amounts billed for services and other costs to its customers, which expire by 2021,consist of 15 Marketers in Georgia. The credit risk exposure to Marketers varies seasonally, with the lowest exposure in the non-peak summer months and the highest exposure in the peak winter months. Marketers are responsible for the retail sale of natural gas to end-use customers in Georgia. The functions of the retail sale of gas include the purchase and sale of natural gas, customer service, billings, and collections. The provisions of Atlanta Gas Light's tariff allow Atlanta Gas Light to obtain credit security support in an amount equal to a minimum of two times a Marketer's highest month's estimated bill from Atlanta Gas Light. For 2018, the four largest Marketers based on customer count, which isincludes SouthStar, accounted for 20% of Southern Company Gas' adjusted operating margin and 25% of gas distribution operations' adjusted operating margin.
Several factors are designed to mitigate Southern Company Gas' risks from the longest hedge date.
increased concentration of credit that has resulted from deregulation. In addition to the volume discussedsecurity support described above, Atlanta Gas Light bills intrastate delivery service to Marketers in advance rather than in arrears. Atlanta Gas Light accepts credit support in the form of cash deposits, letters of credit/surety bonds from acceptable issuers, and corporate guarantees from investment-grade entities. On a monthly basis, a management risk oversight committee reviews the adequacy of credit support coverage, credit rating profiles of credit support providers, and payment status of each Marketer. Southern Company enters into physical natural gas supply contractsGas believes that provideadequate policies and procedures are in place to properly quantify, manage, and report on Atlanta Gas Light's credit risk exposure to Marketers.
Atlanta Gas Light also faces potential credit risk in connection with assignments of interstate pipeline transportation and storage capacity to Marketers. Although Atlanta Gas Light assigns this capacity to Marketers, in the optionevent that a Marketer fails to sell back excess gas due to operational constraints. The expected volume of natural gas subject to such a feature is 10 million mmBtupay the interstate pipelines for the Company.capacity, the interstate pipelines would likely seek repayment from Atlanta Gas Light.
Interest Rate DerivativesWholesale Gas Services
TheSouthern Company mayGas has established credit policies to determine and monitor the creditworthiness of counterparties, as well as the quality of pledged collateral. Southern Company Gas also enter into interest rate derivativesutilizes netting agreements whenever possible to hedgemitigate exposure to changescounterparty credit risk. When Southern Company Gas is engaged in interest rates. The derivatives employed as hedgingmore than one outstanding derivative transaction with the same counterparty and also has a legally enforceable netting agreement with that counterparty, the "net" mark-to-market exposure represents the netting of the positive and negative exposures with that counterparty and a reasonable measure of Southern Company Gas' credit risk. Southern Company Gas also uses other netting agreements with certain counterparties with whom it conducts significant transactions. Netting agreements enable Southern Company Gas to net certain assets and liabilities by counterparty. Southern Company Gas also nets across product lines and against cash collateral, provided the netting and cash collateral agreements include such provisions.
Southern Company Gas may require counterparties to pledge additional collateral when deemed necessary. Southern Company Gas conducts credit evaluations and obtains appropriate internal approvals for a counterparty's line of credit before any transaction with the counterparty is executed. In most cases, the counterparty must have an investment grade rating, which includes a minimum long-term debt rating of Baa3 from Moody's and BBB- from S&P. Generally, Southern Company Gas requires credit enhancements by way of a guaranty, cash deposit, or letter of credit for transaction counterparties that do not have investment grade ratings.
Certain of Southern Company Gas' derivative instruments contain credit-risk-related or other contingent features that could increase the payments for collateral it posts in the normal course of business when its financial instruments are structuredin net liability positions. At December 31, 2018, for agreements with such features, Southern Company Gas' derivative instruments with liability fair values totaled $5 million for which Southern Company Gas had no collateral posted with derivatives counterparties to minimize ineffectiveness. Derivatives related to existing variable rate securitiessatisfy these arrangements.
Southern Company Gas has a concentration of credit risk as measured by its 30-day receivable exposure plus forward exposure. At December 31, 2018, wholesale gas services' top 20 counterparties represented approximately 48%, or forecasted transactions are accounted for as cash flow hedges where$298 million, of its total counterparty exposure and had a weighted average S&P equivalent credit rating of A-, all of which is consistent with the effective portionprior year. The S&P equivalent credit rating is determined by a process of converting the lower of the derivatives' fairS&P or Moody's ratings to an internal rating ranging from 9 to 1, with 9 being equivalent to AAA/Aaa by S&P and Moody's, respectively, and 1 being D / Default by S&P and Moody's, respectively. A counterparty that does not have an external rating is assigned an internal rating based on the strength of the financial ratios of that counterparty. To arrive at the weighted average credit rating, each counterparty is assigned an internal ratio, which is multiplied by their credit exposure and summed for all counterparties. The sum is divided by the aggregate total counterparties' exposures, and this numeric value gains oris then converted to a S&P equivalent.
    Table of Contents                                Index to Financial Statements

NOTESMANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS (continued)
Georgia PowerSouthern Company 2017Gas and Subsidiary Companies 2018 Annual Report


losses is recorded in OCI and is reclassified into earnings at the same time the hedged transactions affect earnings, with any ineffectiveness recorded directly to earnings. At December 31, 2017, there were no cash flow hedges outstanding. DerivativesThe following table provides credit risk information related to fixed rate securities are accounted for as fair value hedges, where the derivatives' fair value gainsSouthern Company Gas' third-party natural gas contracts receivable and losses and the hedged items' fair value gains and losses attributable to interest rate risk are both recorded directly to earnings, providing an offset, with any differences representing ineffectiveness.
At payable positions at December 31, 2017, the following interest rate derivatives were outstanding:31:
 Notional
Amount
 Interest
Rate
Received
 Weighted Average Interest
Rate Paid
 Hedge
Maturity
Date
 Fair Value
Gain (Loss)
December 31,
2017
 (in millions)       (in millions)
Fair Value Hedges of Existing Debt         
 $250
 5.40% 3-month LIBOR + 4.02% June 2018 $
 500
 1.95% 3-month LIBOR + 0.76% December 2018 (3)
 200
 4.25% 3-month LIBOR + 2.46% December 2019 (1)
Total$950
       $(4)
 Gross Receivables Gross Payables
 2018 2017 2018 2017
 (in millions) (in millions)
Netting agreements in place:       
Counterparty is investment grade$461
 $342
 $255
 $202
Counterparty is non-investment grade5
 20
 95
 25
Counterparty has no external rating314
 226
 505
 315
No netting agreements in place:       
Counterparty is investment grade19
 19
 1
 4
Counterparty has no external rating2
 
 
 
Amount recorded in balance sheets$801
 $607
 $856
 $546
Gas Marketing Services
Southern Company Gas obtains credit scores for its firm residential and small commercial customers using a national credit reporting agency, enrolling only those customers that meet or exceed Southern Company Gas' credit threshold. Southern Company Gas considers potential interruptible and large commercial customers based on reviews of publicly available financial statements and commercially available credit reports. Prior to entering into a physical transaction, Southern Company Gas also assigns physical wholesale counterparties an internal credit rating and credit limit based on the counterparties' Moody's, S&P, and Fitch ratings, commercially available credit reports, and audited financial statements.
Capital Requirements and Contractual Obligations
Southern Company Gas' capital investments are currently estimated to total $1.6 billion for 2019, $1.9 billion for 2020, $1.3 billion for 2021, $1.2 billion for 2022, and $1.3 billion for 2023. The estimated pre-tax gains (losses)regulatory infrastructure programs and other construction programs are subject to periodic review and revision, and actual costs may vary from these estimates because of numerous factors. These factors include: changes in business conditions; changes in FERC rules and regulations; state regulatory agency approvals; changes in legislation; the cost and efficiency of labor, equipment, and materials; project scope and design changes; and the cost of capital. In addition, there can be no assurance that costs related to interest rate derivatives thatcapital expenditures will be reclassified from accumulated OCIfully recovered.
In addition, as discussed in Note 11 to interest expense for the 12-month period ending December 31, 2018 total $(4) million. Deferred gainsfinancial statements, Southern Company Gas provides postretirement benefits to certain eligible employees and losses related to interest rate derivative settlements of cash flow hedges are expected to be amortized into earnings through 2037.
Derivative Financial Statement Presentation and Amounts
The Company enters into energy-related and interest rate derivative contracts that may contain provisions that permit intra-contract netting of derivative receivables and payables for routine billing and offsets related to events of default and settlements. Fair value amounts of derivative assets and liabilities on the balance sheets are presented netfunds trusts to the extent that thererequired by the applicable state regulatory agencies.
Funding requirements related to obligations associated with scheduled maturities of long-term debt, including the related interest; pipeline charges, storage capacity, and gas supply; operating leases; asset management agreements; financial derivative obligations; pension and other postretirement benefit plans; and other purchase commitments, primarily related to environmental remediation liabilities, are netting arrangements or similar agreements with the counterparties.

NOTES (continued)
Georgia Power Company 2017 Annual Report

At December 31, 2017 and 2016, the fair value of energy-related derivatives and interest rate derivatives was reflecteddetailed in the balance sheets as follows:
 2017 2016
Derivative Category and Balance Sheet LocationAssetsLiabilities AssetsLiabilities
 (in millions)
Derivatives designated as hedging instruments for regulatory purposes     
Energy-related derivatives:     
Other current assets/Other current liabilities$2
$(9) $30
$1
Other deferred charges and assets/Other deferred credits and liabilities4
(10) 14
7
Total derivatives designated as hedging instruments for regulatory purposes$6
$(19) $44
$8
Derivatives designated as hedging instruments in cash flow and fair value hedges     
Interest rate derivatives:     
Other current assets/Other current liabilities$
$(4) $2
$
Other deferred charges and assets/Other deferred credits and liabilities
(1) 
3
Total derivatives designated as hedging instruments in cash flow and fair value hedges$
$(5) $2
$3
Gross amounts recognized$6
$(24) $46
$11
Gross amounts offset$(6)$6
 $(8)$(8)
Net amounts recognized in the Balance Sheets$
$(18) $38
$3
Energy-related derivatives not designated as hedging instruments were immaterial on the balance sheets for 2017contractual obligations table that follows. See Notes 1, 3, 8, 9, 11, and 2016.
At December 31, 2017 and 2016, the pre-tax effects of unrealized derivative gains (losses) arising from energy-related derivatives designated as regulatory hedging instruments and deferred were as follows:
 Unrealized Losses Unrealized Gains
Derivative CategoryBalance Sheet Location2017 2016 Balance Sheet Location2017 2016
  (in millions)  (in millions)
Energy-related derivatives:Other regulatory assets, current$(7) $
 Other regulatory liabilities, current$
 $29
 Other regulatory assets, deferred(6) 
 Other deferred credits and liabilities
 7
Total energy-related derivative gains (losses) $(13) $
  $
 $36
For the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016, and 2015, the pre-tax effects of interest rate derivatives designated as cash flow hedging instruments on the statements of income were as follows:
Derivatives in Cash Flow Hedging RelationshipsGain (Loss) Recognized in OCI on Derivative (Effective Portion) Gain (Loss) Reclassified from Accumulated OCI into Income (Effective Portion)
        Amount
Derivative Category2017 2016 2015 Statements of Income Location2017 2016 2015
 (in millions)  (in millions)
Interest rate derivatives$1
 $
 $(15) Interest expense, net of amounts capitalized$(4) $(4) $(3)

NOTES (continued)
Georgia Power Company 2017 Annual Report

For the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016, and 2015, the pre-tax effects of interest rate derivatives designated as fair value hedging instruments on the statements of income were immaterial on a gross basis for the Company. Furthermore, the pre-tax effect of interest rate derivatives designated as fair value hedging instruments on the Company's statements of income were offset by changes to the carrying value of long-term debt. The gains and losses related to interest rate derivative settlements of fair value hedges are recorded directly to earnings.
There was no ineffectiveness recorded in earnings for any period presented. The pre-tax effect of energy-related derivatives not designated as hedging instruments on the statements of income was immaterial for all years presented.
Contingent Features
The Company does not have any credit arrangements that would require material changes in payment schedules or terminations as a result of a credit rating downgrade. There are certain derivatives that could require collateral, but not accelerated payment, in the event of various credit rating changes of certain affiliated companies. At December 31, 2017, the Company had no collateral posted with derivative counterparties to satisfy these arrangements.
At December 31, 2017, the fair value of derivative liabilities with contingent features was $2 million. However, because of joint and several liability features underlying these derivatives, the maximum potential collateral requirements arising from the credit-risk-related contingent features, at a rating below BBB- and/or Baa3, were $12 million, and include certain agreements that could require collateral in the event that one or more Southern Company system power pool participants has a credit rating change to below investment grade.
Generally, collateral may be provided by a Southern Company guaranty, letter of credit, or cash. If collateral is required, fair value amounts recognized for the right to reclaim cash collateral or the obligation to return cash collateral are not offset against fair value amounts recognized for derivatives executed with the same counterparty.
The Company is exposed to losses related to financial instruments in the event of counterparties' nonperformance. The Company only enters into agreements and material transactions with counterparties that have investment grade credit ratings by Moody's and S&P or with counterparties who have posted collateral to cover potential credit exposure. The Company has also established risk management policies and controls to determine and monitor the creditworthiness of counterparties in order to mitigate the Company's exposure to counterparty credit risk. Therefore, the Company does not anticipate a material adverse effect on the financial statements as a result of counterparty nonperformance.for additional information.
    Table of Contents                                Index to Financial Statements

NOTESMANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS (continued)
Georgia PowerSouthern Company 2017Gas and Subsidiary Companies 2018 Annual Report


12. QUARTERLY FINANCIAL INFORMATION (UNAUDITED)Contractual Obligations
Summarized quarterly financial information for 2017 and 2016 isContractual obligations at December 31, 2018 were as follows:
Quarter EndedOperating Revenues Operating Income Net Income After Dividends on Preferred and Preference Stock
 (in millions)
March 2017$1,832
 $501
 $260
June 20172,048
 639
 347
September 20172,546
 1,034
 580
December 20171,884
 470
 227

     
March 2016$1,872
 $509
 $269
June 20162,051
 656
 349
September 20162,698
 1,054
 599
December 20161,762
 258
 113
 2019 2020-
2021
 2022-
2023
 After
2023
 Total
 (in millions)
Long-term debt(a) —
         
Principal$350
 $330
 $446
 $4,359
 $5,485
Interest244
 453
 422
 3,242
 4,361
Pipeline charges, storage capacity, and gas supply(b)
781
 1,104
 901
 1,871
 4,657
Operating leases(c)
18
 31
 23
 34
 106
Asset management agreements(d)
10
 8
 
 
 18
Financial derivative obligations(e)
583
 217
 109
 
 909
Pension and other postretirement benefit plans(f)
16
 32
 
 
 48
Purchase commitments —         
Capital(g)
1,591
 3,231
 2,496
 
 7,318
Other(h)
25
 4
 2
 
 31
Total$3,618
 $5,410
 $4,399
 $9,506
 $22,933
(a)Amounts are reflected based on final maturity dates. Southern Company Gas plans to continue, when economically feasible, to retire higher-cost securities and replace these obligations with lower-cost capital if market conditions permit. Variable rate interest obligations are estimated based on rates at December 31, 2018, as reflected in the statements of capitalization.
(b)Includes charges recoverable through a natural gas cost recovery mechanism, or alternatively billed to Marketers, and demand charges associated with Sequent. The gas supply balance includes amounts for Nicor Gas and SouthStar gas commodity purchase commitments of 47 million mmBtu at floating gas prices calculated using forward natural gas prices at December 31, 2018 and valued at $150 million. Southern Company Gas provides guarantees to certain gas suppliers for certain of its subsidiaries, including SouthStar, in support of payment obligations.
(c)Certain operating leases have provisions for step rent or escalation payments and certain lease concessions are accounted for by recognizing the future minimum lease payments on a straight-line basis over the respective minimum lease terms. However, this accounting treatment does not affect the future annual operating lease cash obligations as shown herein. In terms of rental charges and duration of contracts, Southern Company Gas' most significant operating leases relate to real estate.
(d)Represent fixed-fee minimum payments for Sequent's affiliated asset management agreements.
(e)See Notes 1 and 14 to the financial statements for additional information.
(f)Southern Company Gas forecasts contributions to the pension and other postretirement benefit plans over a three-year period. Southern Company Gas anticipates no mandatory contributions to the qualified pension plan during the next three years. Amounts presented represent estimated benefit payments for the nonqualified pension plans, estimated non-trust benefit payments for the other postretirement benefit plans, and estimated contributions to the other postretirement benefit plan trusts, all of which will be made from Southern Company Gas' corporate assets. See Note 11 to the financial statements for additional information related to the pension and other postretirement benefit plans, including estimated benefit payments. Certain benefit payments will be made through the related benefit plans. Other benefit payments will be made from Southern Company Gas' corporate assets.
(g)Estimated capital expenditures are provided through 2023. At December 31, 2018, significant purchase commitments were outstanding in connection with infrastructure and other construction programs.
(h)Includes contractual environmental remediation liabilities that are generally recoverable through base rates or rate rider mechanisms and LTSAs.
The Company's business is influenced by seasonal weather conditions.
Item 7A.QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK
See MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS – FINANCIAL CONDITION AND LIQUIDITY – "Market Price Risk" of each of the registrants in Item 7 herein and Note 1 to the financial statements under "Financial Instruments" in Item 8 herein. Also see Notes 13 and 14 to the financial statements in Item 8 herein.

Item 8.FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA
INDEX TO 2018 FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Page

    Table of Contents                                Index to Financial Statements


REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
To the stockholders and the Board of Directors of The Southern Company and Subsidiary Companies
Opinions on the Financial Statements and Internal Control over Financial Reporting
SELECTED FINANCIAL AND OPERATING DATA 2013-2017We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets and consolidated statements of capitalization of The Southern Company and subsidiary companies (Southern Company) as of December 31, 2018 and 2017, the related consolidated statements of income, comprehensive income, stockholders' equity, and cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2018, and the related notes (collectively referred to as the "financial statements"). We also have audited Southern Company's internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2018, based on criteria established in Internal Control - Integrated Framework (2013) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO).
Georgia PowerIn our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Southern Company as of December 31, 2018 and 2017, Annualand the results of its operations and its cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2018, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. Also, in our opinion, Southern Company maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2018, based on criteria established in Internal Control – Integrated Framework (2013) issued by COSO.
Basis for Opinions
Southern Company's management is responsible for these financial statements, for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting, and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, included in the accompanying Management's Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements and an opinion on Southern Company's internal control over financial reporting based on our audits. We are a public accounting firm registered with the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (PCAOB) and are required to be independent with respect to Southern Company in accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.
 2017
 2016
 2015
 2014
 2013
Operating Revenues (in millions)$8,310
 $8,383
 $8,326
 $8,988
 $8,274
Net Income After Dividends
on Preferred and Preference Stock (in millions)
$1,414
 $1,330
 $1,260
 $1,225
 $1,174
Cash Dividends on Common Stock (in millions)$1,281
 $1,305
 $1,034
 $954
 $907
Return on Average Common Equity (percent)12.15
 12.05
 11.92
 12.24
 12.45
Total Assets (in millions)(a)(b)
$36,779
 $34,835
 $32,865
 $30,872
 $28,776
Gross Property Additions (in millions)$1,080
 $2,314
 $2,332
 $2,146
 $1,906
Capitalization (in millions):         
Common stock equity$11,931
 $11,356
 $10,719
 $10,421
 $9,591
Preferred and preference stock
 266
 266
 266
 266
Long-term debt(a)
11,073
 10,225
 9,616
 8,563
 8,571
Total (excluding amounts due within one year)$23,004
 $21,847
 $20,601
 $19,250
 $18,428
Capitalization Ratios (percent):         
Common stock equity51.9
 52.0
 52.0
 54.1
 52.0
Preferred and preference stock
 1.2
 1.3
 1.4
 1.4
Long-term debt(a)
48.1
 46.8
 46.7
 44.5
 46.6
Total (excluding amounts due within one year)100.0
 100.0
 100.0
 100.0
 100.0
Customers (year-end):         
Residential2,185,782
 2,155,945
 2,127,658
 2,102,673
 2,080,358
Commercial(c)
308,939
 305,488
 302,891
 300,186
 297,493
Industrial(c)
10,644
 10,537
 10,429
 10,192
 10,063
Other9,766
 9,585
 9,261
 9,003
 8,623
Total2,515,131
 2,481,555
 2,450,239
 2,422,054
 2,396,537
Employees (year-end)6,986
 7,527
 7,989
 7,909
 7,886
We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audits to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement, whether due to error or fraud, and whether effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material respects.
(a)A reclassification of debt issuance costs from Total Assets to Long-term debt of $124 million and $62 million is reflected for years 2014 and 2013, respectively, in accordance with new accounting standards adopted in 2015 and applied retrospectively.
(b)A reclassification of deferred tax assets from Total Assets of $34 million and $68 million is reflected for years 2014 and 2013, respectively, in accordance with new accounting standards adopted in 2015 and applied retrospectively.
(c)A reclassification of customers from commercial to industrial is reflected for years 2013-2015 to be consistent with the rate structure approved by the Georgia PSC. The impact to operating revenues, kilowatt-hour sales, and average revenue per kilowatt-hour by class is not material.
Our audits of the consolidated financial statements included performing procedures to assess the risks of material misstatement of the financial statements, whether due to error or fraud, and performing procedures to respond to those risks. Such procedures included examining, on a test basis, evidence regarding the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. Our audits also included evaluating the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the financial statements. Our audit of internal control over financial reporting included obtaining an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, assessing the risk that a material weakness exists, and testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control based on the assessed risk. Our audits also included performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinions.

Definition and Limitations of Internal Control over Financial Reporting
the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company; and (3) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the company's assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.

Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.
SELECTED FINANCIAL AND OPERATING DATA 2013-2017 (continued)/s/ Deloitte & Touche LLP
Atlanta, Georgia Power Company 2017 Annual Report
February 19, 2019
 2017
 2016
 2015
 2014
 2013
Operating Revenues (in millions):         
Residential$3,236
 $3,318
 $3,240
 $3,350
 $3,058
Commercial3,092
 3,077
 3,094
 3,271
 3,077
Industrial1,321
 1,291
 1,305
 1,525
 1,391
Other89
 86
 88
 94
 94
Total retail7,738
 7,772
 7,727
 8,240
 7,620
Wholesale — non-affiliates163
 175
 215
 335
 281
Wholesale — affiliates26
 42
 20
 42
 20
Total revenues from sales of electricity7,927
 7,989
 7,962
 8,617
 7,921
Other revenues383
 394
 364
 371
 353
Total$8,310
 $8,383
 $8,326
 $8,988
 $8,274
Kilowatt-Hour Sales (in millions):         
Residential26,144
 27,585
 26,649
 27,132
 25,479
Commercial32,155
 32,932
 32,719
 32,426
 31,984
Industrial23,518
 23,746
 23,805
 23,549
 23,087
Other584
 610
 632
 633
 630
Total retail82,401
 84,873
 83,805
 83,740
 81,180
Wholesale — non-affiliates3,277
 3,415
 3,501
 4,323
 3,029
Wholesale — affiliates800
 1,398
 552
 1,117
 496
Total86,478
 89,686
 87,858
 89,180
 84,705
Average Revenue Per Kilowatt-Hour (cents):         
Residential12.38
 12.03
 12.16
 12.35
 12.00
Commercial9.62
 9.34
 9.46
 10.09
 9.62
Industrial5.62
 5.44
 5.48
 6.48
 6.03
Total retail9.39
 9.16
 9.22
 9.84
 9.39
Wholesale4.64
 4.51
 5.80
 6.93
 8.54
Total sales9.17
 8.91
 9.06
 9.66
 9.35
Residential Average Annual
Kilowatt-Hour Use Per Customer
12,028
 12,864
 12,582
 12,969
 12,293
Residential Average Annual
Revenue Per Customer
$1,489
 $1,557
 $1,529
 $1,605
 $1,475
Plant Nameplate Capacity
Ratings (year-end) (megawatts)
15,274
 15,274
 15,455
 17,593
 17,586
Maximum Peak-Hour Demand (megawatts):         
Winter13,894
 14,527
 15,735
 16,308
 12,767
Summer16,002
 16,244
 16,104
 15,777
 15,228
Annual Load Factor (percent)61.1
 61.9
 61.9
 61.2
 63.5
Plant Availability (percent):         
Fossil-steam85.0
 87.4
 85.6
 86.3
 87.1
Nuclear93.5
 95.6
 94.1
 90.8
 91.8
Source of Energy Supply (percent):         
Oil and gas28.6
 28.2
 28.3
 26.3
 29.6
Coal22.4
 26.4
 24.5
 30.9
 26.4
Nuclear17.8
 17.6
 17.6
 16.7
 17.7
Hydro1.0
 1.1
 1.6
 1.3
 2.0
Other0.3
 
 
 
 
Purchased power —         
From non-affiliates7.8
 6.7
 5.0
 3.8
 3.3
From affiliates22.1
 20.0
 23.0
 21.0
 21.0
Total100.0
 100.0
 100.0
 100.0
 100.0

We have served as Southern Company's auditor since 2002.
    Table of Contents                                Index to Financial Statements

GULF POWER COMPANYCONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME
FINANCIAL SECTIONFor the Years Ended December 31, 2018, 2017, and 2016
Southern Company and Subsidiary Companies 2018 Annual Report

 2018
 2017
 2016
 (in millions)
Operating Revenues:     
Retail electric revenues$15,222
 $15,330
 $15,234
Wholesale electric revenues2,516
 2,426
 1,926
Other electric revenues664
 681
 698
Natural gas revenues3,854
 3,791
 1,596
Other revenues1,239
 803
 442
Total operating revenues23,495
 23,031
 19,896
Operating Expenses:     
Fuel4,637
 4,400
 4,361
Purchased power971
 863
 750
Cost of natural gas1,539
 1,601
 613
Cost of other sales806
 513
 260
Other operations and maintenance5,889
 5,739
 5,382
Depreciation and amortization3,131
 3,010
 2,502
Taxes other than income taxes1,315
 1,250
 1,113
Estimated loss on plants under construction1,097
 3,362
 428
Impairment charges210
 
 
Gain on dispositions, net(291) (40) 1
Total operating expenses19,304
 20,698
 15,410
Operating Income4,191
 2,333
 4,486
Other Income and (Expense):     
Allowance for equity funds used during construction138
 160
 202
Earnings from equity method investments148
 106
 59
Interest expense, net of amounts capitalized(1,842) (1,694) (1,317)
Other income (expense), net114
 163
 50
Total other income and (expense)(1,442) (1,265) (1,006)
Earnings Before Income Taxes2,749
 1,068
 3,480
Income taxes449
 142
 951
Consolidated Net Income2,300
 926
 2,529
Dividends on preferred and preference stock of subsidiaries16
 38
 45
Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests58
 46
 36
Consolidated Net Income Attributable to Southern Company$2,226
 $842
 $2,448
Common Stock Data:     
Earnings per share —     
Basic$2.18
 $0.84
 $2.57
Diluted2.17
 0.84
 2.55
Average number of shares of common stock outstanding — (in millions)     
Basic1,020
 1,000
 951
Diluted1,025
 1,008
 958
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
 

    Table of Contents                                Index to Financial Statements

MANAGEMENT'S REPORT ON INTERNAL CONTROL OVER FINANCIAL REPORTINGCONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME
Gulf PowerFor the Years Ended December 31, 2018, 2017, and 2016
Southern Company 2017and Subsidiary Companies 2018 Annual Report
 2018
 2017
 2016
 (in millions)
Consolidated Net Income$2,300
 $926
 $2,529
Other comprehensive income (loss):     
Qualifying hedges:     
Changes in fair value, net of tax of $(16), $34, and $(84), respectively(47) 57
 (136)
Reclassification adjustment for amounts included in net income,
net of tax of $24, $(37), and $43, respectively
72
 (60) 69
Pension and other postretirement benefit plans:     
Benefit plan net gain (loss), net of tax of $(2), $6, and $10,
respectively
(5) 17
 13
Reclassification adjustment for amounts included in net income,
net of tax of $5, $(6), and $3, respectively
6
 (23) 4
Total other comprehensive income (loss)26
 (9) (50)
Dividends on preferred and preference stock of subsidiaries16
 38
 45
Comprehensive income attributable to noncontrolling interests58
 46
 36
Consolidated Comprehensive Income Attributable to Southern Company$2,252
 $833
 $2,398
The managementaccompanying notes are an integral part of Gulf Power Company (the Company) is responsible for establishing and maintaining an adequate system of internal control overthese consolidated financial reporting as required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and as defined in Exchange Act Rule 13a-15(f). A control system can provide only reasonable, not absolute, assurance that the objectives of the control system are met.statements.
Under management's supervision, an evaluation of the design and effectiveness of the Company's internal control over financial reporting was conducted based on the framework in Internal Control—Integrated Framework (2013) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission. Based on this evaluation, management concluded that the Company's internal control over financial reporting was effective as of December 31, 2017.

/s/ S. W. Connally, Jr.
S. W. Connally, Jr.
Chairman, President, and Chief Executive Officer

/s/ Robin B. Boren
Robin B. Boren
Vice President, Chief Financial Officer, and Treasurer
February 20, 2018

    Table of Contents                                Index to Financial Statements

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
For the Years Ended December 31, 2018, 2017, and 2016
Southern Company and Subsidiary Companies 2018 Annual Report
 2018
 2017
 2016
   (in millions)
Operating Activities:     
Consolidated net income$2,300
 $926
 $2,529
Adjustments to reconcile consolidated net income
to net cash provided from operating activities —
     
Depreciation and amortization, total3,549
 3,457
 2,923
Deferred income taxes94
 166
 (127)
Collateral deposits17
 (4) (102)
Allowance for equity funds used during construction(138) (160) (202)
Pension and postretirement funding(4) (2) (1,029)
Settlement of asset retirement obligations(244) (177) (171)
Stock based compensation expense125
 109
 121
Hedge settlements(10) 6
 (233)
Estimated loss on plants under construction1,093
 3,179
 428
Impairment charges210
 
 
Gain on dispositions, net(301) (42) (2)
Other, net(22) (112) (219)
Changes in certain current assets and liabilities —     
-Receivables(426) (202) (544)
-Fossil fuel for generation123
 36
 178
-Natural gas for sale49
 36
 (226)
-Other current assets(127) (143) (206)
-Accounts payable291
 (280) 301
-Accrued taxes267
 (142) 1,456
-Retail fuel cost over recovery36
 (212) (231)
-Other current liabilities63
 (45) 250
Net cash provided from operating activities6,945
 6,394
 4,894
Investing Activities:     
Business acquisitions, net of cash acquired(65) (1,054) (10,680)
Property additions(8,001) (7,423) (7,310)
Proceeds pursuant to the Toshiba Guarantee, net of joint owner portion               
 1,682
 
Nuclear decommissioning trust fund purchases(1,117) (811) (1,160)
Nuclear decommissioning trust fund sales1,111
 805
 1,154
Proceeds from dispositions2,956
 97
 15
Cost of removal, net of salvage(388) (313) (245)
Change in construction payables, net50
 259
 (121)
Investment in unconsolidated subsidiaries(114) (152) (1,444)
Payments pursuant to LTSAs(186) (227) (134)
Other investing activities(6) (53) (122)
Net cash used for investing activities(5,760) (7,190) (20,047)
Financing Activities:     
Increase (decrease) in notes payable, net(774) (401) 1,228
Proceeds —     
Long-term debt2,478
 5,858
 16,368
Common stock1,090
 793
 3,758
Preferred stock
 250
 
Short-term borrowings3,150
 1,259
 
Redemptions and repurchases —     
Long-term debt(5,533) (2,930) (3,145)
Preferred and preference stock(33) (658) 
Short-term borrowings(1,900) (659) (478)
Distributions to noncontrolling interests(153) (119) (72)
Capital contributions from noncontrolling interests2,551
 80
 682
Payment of common stock dividends(2,425) (2,300) (2,104)
Other financing activities(264) (222) (512)
Net cash provided from (used for) financing activities(1,813) 951
 15,725
Net Change in Cash, Cash Equivalents, and Restricted Cash(628) 155
 572
Cash, Cash Equivalents, and Restricted Cash at Beginning of Year2,147
 1,992
 1,420
Cash, Cash Equivalents, and Restricted Cash at End of Year$1,519
 $2,147
 $1,992
Supplemental Cash Flow Information:     
Cash paid (received) during the period for —     
Interest (net of $72, $89, and $128 capitalized, respectively)$1,794
 $1,676
 $1,066
Income taxes (net of refunds)172
 (410) (148)
Noncash transactions — Accrued property additions at year-end1,103
 985
 1,262
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
At December 31, 2018 and 2017
Southern Company and Subsidiary Companies 2018 Annual Report
Assets2018
 2017
 (in millions)
Current Assets:   
Cash and cash equivalents$1,396
 $2,130
Receivables —   
Customer accounts receivable1,726
 1,806
Energy marketing receivable801
 607
Unbilled revenues654
 810
Under recovered fuel clause revenues115
 171
Other accounts and notes receivable813
 698
Accumulated provision for uncollectible accounts(50) (44)
Materials and supplies1,465
 1,438
Fossil fuel for generation405
 594
Natural gas for sale524
 595
Prepaid expenses432
 452
Assets from risk management activities, net of collateral222
 137
Other regulatory assets, current525
 604
Assets held for sale, current393
 12
Other current assets162
 62
Total current assets9,583
 10,072
Property, Plant, and Equipment:   
In service103,706
 103,542
Less: Accumulated depreciation31,038
 31,457
Plant in service, net of depreciation72,668
 72,085
Nuclear fuel, at amortized cost875
 883
Construction work in progress7,254
 6,904
Total property, plant, and equipment80,797
 79,872
Other Property and Investments:   
Goodwill5,315

6,268
Equity investments in unconsolidated subsidiaries1,580

1,513
Other intangible assets, net of amortization of $235 and $186
at December 31, 2018 and December 31, 2017, respectively
613
 873
Nuclear decommissioning trusts, at fair value1,721
 1,832
Leveraged leases798
 775
Miscellaneous property and investments269
 249
Total other property and investments10,296
 11,510
Deferred Charges and Other Assets:   
Deferred charges related to income taxes794
 825
Unamortized loss on reacquired debt323
 206
Other regulatory assets8,308
 6,943
Assets held for sale5,350
 
Other deferred charges and assets1,463
 1,577
Total deferred charges and other assets16,238
 9,551
Total Assets$116,914
 $111,005
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
At December 31, 2018 and 2017
Southern Company and Subsidiary Companies 2018 Annual Report
Liabilities and Stockholders' Equity2018
 2017
 (in millions)
Current Liabilities:   
Securities due within one year$3,198
 $3,892
Notes payable2,915
 2,439
Energy marketing trade payables856
 546
Accounts payable2,580
 2,530
Customer deposits522
 542
Accrued taxes656
 636
Accrued interest472
 488
Accrued compensation1,030
 959
Asset retirement obligations, current404
 351
Other regulatory liabilities, current376
 337
Liabilities held for sale, current425
 
Other current liabilities852
 874
Total current liabilities14,286
 13,594
Long-Term Debt (See accompanying statements)
40,736
 44,462
Deferred Credits and Other Liabilities:   
Accumulated deferred income taxes6,558
 6,842
Deferred credits related to income taxes6,460
 7,256
Accumulated deferred ITCs2,372
 2,267
Employee benefit obligations2,147
 2,256
Asset retirement obligations8,990
 4,473
Accrued environmental remediation268
 389
Other cost of removal obligations2,297
 2,684
Other regulatory liabilities169
 239
Liabilities held for sale2,836
 
Other deferred credits and liabilities465
 691
Total deferred credits and other liabilities32,562
 27,097
Total Liabilities87,584
 85,153
Redeemable Preferred Stock of Subsidiaries (See accompanying statements)
291
 324
Total Stockholders' Equity (See accompanying statements)
29,039
 25,528
Total Liabilities and Stockholders' Equity$116,914
 $111,005
Commitments and Contingent Matters (See notes)

 
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CAPITALIZATION
At December 31, 2018 and 2017
Southern Company and Subsidiary Companies 2018 Annual Report

   2018
 2017
 2018
 2017
   (in millions)  (percent of total)
Long-Term Debt:         
Long-term debt payable to affiliated trusts —         
Variable rate (5.50% at 12/31/18) due 2042  $206
 $206
    
Long-term senior notes and debt —         
MaturityInterest Rates        
20181.50% to 5.40% 
 2,352
    
20191.85% to 5.55% 2,948
 3,074
    
20202.00% to 4.75% 2,271
 2,273
    
20212.35% to 9.10% 2,638
 2,643
    
20221.00% to 8.70% 1,983
 2,016
    
20232.45% to 5.75% 2,290
 2,290
    
2025 through 20481.63% to 7.30% 19,895
 19,902
    
Variable rates (2.29% to 3.05% at 12/31/17) due 2018  
 1,420
    
Variable rates (3.10% to 3.50% at 12/31/18) due 2020  1,875
 825
    
Variable rates (3.34% to 3.91% at 12/31/18) due 2021  125
 25
    
Total long-term senior notes and debt  34,025
 36,820
    
Other long-term debt —         
Pollution control revenue bonds —         
MaturityInterest Rates        
20194.55% 25
 25
    
20222.10% to 2.35% 90
 90
    
20231.15% to 2.60% 33
 33
    
2025 through 20491.40% to 5.15% 1,112
 1,346
    
Variable rates (1.77% to 2.23% at 12/31/18) due 2019  148
 148
    
Variable rates (1.76% to 1.87% at 12/31/18) due 2021  65
 65
    
Variable rates (1.76% at 12/31/18) due 2022  4
 4
    
Variable rates (1.70% to 1.87% at 12/31/18) due 2024 to 2053  1,417
 1,585
    
Plant Daniel revenue bonds (7.13%) due 2021  270
 270
    
Gas facility revenue bonds —         
Variable rate (1.71% at 12/31/17) due 2022  
 47
    
Variable rate (1.71% at 12/31/17) due 2024 to 2033  
 154
    
FFB loans —         
2.57% to 3.86% due 2020  44
 44
    
2.57% to 3.86% due 2021  44
 44
    
2.57% to 3.86% due 2022  44
 44
    
2.57% to 3.86% due 2023  44
 44
    
2.57% to 3.86% due 2024 to 2044  2,449
 2,449
    
First mortgage bonds —         
4.70% due 2019  50
 50
    
5.80% due 2023  50
 50
    
2.66% to 6.58% due 2026 to 2058  1,225
 925
    
Junior subordinated notes (5.00% to 6.25%) due 2057 to 2077  3,570
 3,570
    
Total other long-term debt  10,684
 10,987
    
Unamortized fair value adjustment of long-term debt  474
 525
    
Capitalized lease obligations  197
 204
    
Unamortized debt premium  36
 44
    
Unamortized debt discount  (194) (206)    
Unamortized debt issuance expense  (208) (226)    
Total long-term debt (annual interest requirement — $1.7 billion) 45,220
 48,354
    
Less:         
Amount due within one year  3,198
 3,892
    
Amount held for sale  1,286
 
    
Long-term debt excluding amounts due within one year and held for sale  40,736
 44,462
 58.1% 63.2%
          

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CAPITALIZATION (continued)
At December 31, 2018 and 2017
Southern Company and Subsidiary Companies 2018 Annual Report
        
   2018
 2017
 2018
 2017
   (in millions)  (percent of total)
Redeemable Preferred Stock of Subsidiaries:         
Cumulative preferred stock         
$100 par or stated value — 4.20% to 5.44%         
Authorized — 20 million shares         
Outstanding — 2018: 475,115 shares         
                — 2017: 809,325 shares  48
 81
    
$1 par value — 5.83%         
Authorized — 28 million shares         
Outstanding — 10,000,000 shares  243
 243
    
Total redeemable preferred stock of subsidiaries
  

 

    
(annual dividend requirement — $15 million)  291
 324
 0.4
 0.5
Common Stockholders' Equity:         
Common stock, par value $5 per share —  5,164
 5,038
    
Authorized — 1.5 billion shares         
Issued — 2018: 1.0 billion shares         
  — 2017: 1.0 billion shares         
Treasury — 2018: 1.0 million shares         
      — 2017: 0.9 million shares         
Paid-in capital  11,094
 10,469
    
Treasury, at cost  (38) (36)    
Retained earnings  8,706
 8,885
    
Accumulated other comprehensive loss  (203) (189)    
Total common stockholders' equity  24,723
 24,167
 35.3
 34.4
Noncontrolling interests  4,316
 1,361
 6.2
 1.9
Total stockholders' equity  29,039
 25,528
    
Total Capitalization  $70,066
 $70,314
 100.0% 100.0%

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements. 

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY
For the Years Ended December 31, 2018, 2017, and 2016
Southern Company and Subsidiary Companies 2018 Annual Report
 Southern Company Common Stockholders' Equity     
 Number of Common Shares Common Stock   
Accumulated
Other
Comprehensive Income
(Loss)
 
Preferred
and Preference Stock of Subsidiaries
 
Noncontrolling
Interests(a)
 
 Issued Treasury Par Value Paid-In Capital Treasury Retained Earnings   Total
 (in thousands) (in millions)
Balance at December 31, 2015915,073
 (3,352) $4,572
 $6,282
 $(142) $10,010
 $(130) $609
 $781
$21,982
Consolidated net income attributable
   to Southern Company

 
 
 
 
 2,448
 
 
 
2,448
Other comprehensive income (loss)
 
 
 
 
 
 (50) 
 
(50)
Stock issued76,140
 2,599
 380
 3,263
 115
 
 
 
 
3,758
Stock-based compensation
 
 
 120
 
 
 
 
 
120
Cash dividends of $2.2225 per share
 
 
 
 
 (2,104) 
 
 
(2,104)
Contributions from
   noncontrolling interests

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 618
618
Distributions to
   noncontrolling interests

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 (57)(57)
Purchase of membership interests
from noncontrolling interests

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 (129)(129)
Net income attributable to
   noncontrolling interests

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 32
32
Other
 (66) 
 (4) (4) 2
 
 
 
(6)
Balance at December 31, 2016991,213
 (819) 4,952
 9,661
 (31) 10,356
 (180) 609
 1,245
26,612
Consolidated net income attributable
   to Southern Company

 
 
 
 
 842
 
 
 
842
Other comprehensive income (loss)
 
 
 
 
 
 (9) 
 
(9)
Stock issued17,319
 
 86
 707
 
 
 
 
 
793
Stock-based compensation
 
 
 105
 
 
 
 
 
105
Cash dividends of $2.3000 per share
 
 
 
 
 (2,300) 
 
 
(2,300)
Preferred and preference stock
redemptions

 
 
 
 
 
 
 (609) 
(609)
Contributions from
   noncontrolling interests

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 79
79
Distributions to
   noncontrolling interests

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 (122)(122)
Net income attributable to
   noncontrolling interests

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 44
44
Reclassification from redeemable
noncontrolling interests

 ��
 
 
 
 
 
 
 114
114
Other
 (110) 
 (4) (5) (13) 
 
 1
(21)
Balance at December 31, 20171,008,532
 (929) 5,038
 10,469
 (36) 8,885
 (189) 
 1,361
25,528
Consolidated net income attributable
   to Southern Company

 
 
 
 
 2,226
 
 
 
2,226
Other comprehensive income (loss)
 
 
 
 
 
 26
 
 
26
Stock issued26,209
 
 126
 964
 
 
 
 
 
1,090
Stock-based compensation
 
 
 84
 
 
 
 
 
84
Cash dividends of $2.3800 per share
 
 
 
 
 (2,425) 
 
 
(2,425)
Contributions from
   noncontrolling interests

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 1,372
1,372
Distributions to
   noncontrolling interests

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 (164)(164)
Net income attributable to
   noncontrolling interests

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 58
58
Sale of noncontrolling interests
 
 
 (417) 
 
 
 
 1,690
1,273
Other
 (24) 
 (6) (2) 20
 (40) 
 (1)(29)
Balance at December 31, 20181,034,741
 (953) $5,164
 $11,094
 $(38) $8,706
 $(203) $
 $4,316
$29,039
(a)Excludes redeemable noncontrolling interests. See Note 7 to the financial statements under "Noncontrolling Interests" for additional information.
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.


REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
To the stockholderstockholders and the Board of Directors of GulfAlabama Power Company
Opinion on the Financial Statements
We have audited the accompanying balance sheets and statements of capitalization of GulfAlabama Power Company (the Company)(Alabama Power) (a wholly-owned subsidiary of The Southern Company) as of December 31, 20172018 and 2016,2017, the related statements of income, comprehensive income, common stockholder's equity, and cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2017,2018, and the related notes (collectively referred to as the "financial statements"). In our opinion, the financial statements (pages II-353 to II-391) present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of the CompanyAlabama Power as of December 31, 20172018 and 2016,2017, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2017,2018, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.
Basis for Opinion
These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company'sAlabama Power's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Company'sAlabama Power's financial statements based on our audits. We are a public accounting firm registered with the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (PCAOB) and are required to be independent with respect to the CompanyAlabama Power in accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.
We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement, whether due to error or fraud. The CompanyAlabama Power is not required to have, nor were we engaged to perform, an audit of its internal control over financial reporting. As part of our audits, we are required to obtain an understanding of internal control over financial reporting but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of Alabama Power's internal control over financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion.
Our audits included performing procedures to assess the Company'srisks of material misstatement of the financial statements, whether due to error or fraud, and performing procedures that respond to those risks. Such procedures included examining, on a test basis, evidence regarding the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. Our audits also included evaluating the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the financial statements. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
/s/ Deloitte & Touche LLP
Birmingham, Alabama
February 19, 2019
We have served as Alabama Power's auditor since 2002.

STATEMENTS OF INCOME
For the Years Ended December 31, 2018, 2017, and 2016
Alabama Power Company 2018 Annual Report
 2018
 2017
 2016
 (in millions)
Operating Revenues:     
Retail revenues$5,367
 $5,458
 $5,322
Wholesale revenues, non-affiliates279
 276
 283
Wholesale revenues, affiliates119
 97
 69
Other revenues267
 208
 215
Total operating revenues6,032
 6,039
 5,889
Operating Expenses:     
Fuel1,301
 1,225
 1,297
Purchased power, non-affiliates216
 170
 166
Purchased power, affiliates216
 158
 168
Other operations and maintenance1,669
 1,709
 1,557
Depreciation and amortization764
 736
 703
Taxes other than income taxes389
 384
 380
Total operating expenses4,555
 4,382
 4,271
Operating Income1,477
 1,657
 1,618
Other Income and (Expense):     
Allowance for equity funds used during construction62
 39
 28
Interest expense, net of amounts capitalized(323) (305) (302)
Other income (expense), net20
 43
 26
Total other income and (expense)(241) (223) (248)
Earnings Before Income Taxes1,236
 1,434
 1,370
Income taxes291
 568
 531
Net Income945
 866
 839
Dividends on Preferred and Preference Stock15
 18
 17
Net Income After Dividends on Preferred and Preference Stock$930
 $848
 $822
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.


STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME
For the Years Ended December 31, 2018, 2017, and 2016
Alabama Power Company 2018 Annual Report

 2018
 2017
 2016
 (in millions)
Net Income$945
 $866
 $839
Other comprehensive income (loss):     
Qualifying hedges:     
Changes in fair value, net of tax of $-, $(1), and $(1), respectively
 1
 (2)
Reclassification adjustment for amounts included in net income,
net of tax of $2, $2, and $2, respectively
4
 3
 4
Total other comprehensive income (loss)4
 4
 2
Comprehensive Income$949
 $870
 $841
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
For the Years Ended December 31, 2018, 2017, and 2016
Alabama Power Company 2018 Annual Report
 2018
 2017
 2016
 (in millions)
Operating Activities:     
Net income$945
 $866
 $839
Adjustments to reconcile net income
to net cash provided from operating activities —
     
Depreciation and amortization, total917
 888
 844
Deferred income taxes174
 409
 407
Allowance for equity funds used during construction(62) (39) (28)
Pension and postretirement funding(4) (2) (133)
Settlement of asset retirement obligations(55) (26) (25)
Other, net(1) 13
 (77)
Changes in certain current assets and liabilities —     
-Receivables(149) (168) 94
-Prepayments(2) (2) 1
-Materials and supplies(82) (34) (38)
-Other current assets30
 20
 38
-Accounts payable24
 71
 73
-Accrued taxes10
 (84) 93
-Accrued compensation8
 (2) 12
-Retail fuel cost over recovery
 (76) (162)
-Other current liabilities128
 3
 11
Net cash provided from operating activities1,881
 1,837
 1,949
Investing Activities:     
Property additions(2,158) (1,882) (1,272)
Nuclear decommissioning trust fund purchases(279) (237) (352)
Nuclear decommissioning trust fund sales278
 237
 351
Cost of removal net of salvage(130) (112) (94)
Change in construction payables26
 161
 (37)
Other investing activities(26) (43) (34)
Net cash used for investing activities(2,289) (1,876) (1,438)
Financing Activities:     
Proceeds —     
Senior notes500
 1,100
 400
Preferred stock
 250
 
Pollution control revenue bonds120
 
 
Other long-term debt
 
 45
Capital contributions from parent company511
 361
 260
Redemptions and repurchases —     
Senior notes
 (525) (200)
Preferred and preference stock
 (238) 
Pollution control revenue bonds(120) (36) 
Payment of common stock dividends(801) (714) (765)
Other financing activities(33) (35) (25)
Net cash provided from (used for) financing activities177
 163
 (285)
Net Change in Cash, Cash Equivalents, and Restricted Cash(231) 124
 226
Cash, Cash Equivalents, and Restricted Cash at Beginning of Year544
 420
 194
Cash, Cash Equivalents, and Restricted Cash at End of Year$313
 $544
 $420
Supplemental Cash Flow Information:     
Cash paid (received) during the period for —     
Interest (net of $22, $15, and $11 capitalized, respectively)$284
 $285
 $277
Income taxes (net of refunds)106
 236
 (108)
Noncash transactions — Accrued property additions at year-end272
 245
 84
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

BALANCE SHEETS
At December 31, 2018 and 2017
Alabama Power Company 2018 Annual Report
Assets2018
 2017
 (in millions)
Current Assets:   
Cash and cash equivalents$313
 $544
Receivables —   
Customer accounts receivable403
 355
Unbilled revenues150
 162
Affiliated94
 43
Other accounts and notes receivable51
 55
Accumulated provision for uncollectible accounts(10) (9)
Fossil fuel stock141
 184
Materials and supplies546
 458
Prepaid expenses66
 85
Other regulatory assets, current137
 124
Other current assets18
 5
Total current assets1,909
 2,006
Property, Plant, and Equipment:   
In service30,402
 27,326
Less: Accumulated provision for depreciation9,988
 9,563
Plant in service, net of depreciation20,414
 17,763
Nuclear fuel, at amortized cost324
 339
Construction work in progress1,113
 908
Total property, plant, and equipment21,851
 19,010
Other Property and Investments:   
Equity investments in unconsolidated subsidiaries65
 67
Nuclear decommissioning trusts, at fair value847
 903
Miscellaneous property and investments127
 124
Total other property and investments1,039
 1,094
Deferred Charges and Other Assets:   
Deferred charges related to income taxes240
 239
Deferred under recovered regulatory clause revenues116
 54
Other regulatory assets, deferred1,386
 1,272
Other deferred charges and assets189
 189
Total deferred charges and other assets1,931
 1,754
Total Assets$26,730
 $23,864
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.


BALANCE SHEETS
At December 31, 2018 and 2017
Alabama Power Company 2018 Annual Report
Liabilities and Stockholder's Equity2018
 2017
 (in millions)
Current Liabilities:   
Securities due within one year$201
 $
Accounts payable —   
Affiliated364
 327
Other614
 585
Customer deposits96
 92
Accrued taxes44
 54
Accrued interest89
 77
Accrued compensation227
 205
Asset retirement obligations, current163
 7
Other current liabilities161
 53
Total current liabilities1,959
 1,400
Long-Term Debt (See accompanying statements)
7,923
 7,628
Deferred Credits and Other Liabilities:   
Accumulated deferred income taxes2,962
 2,760
Deferred credits related to income taxes2,027
 2,082
Accumulated deferred ITCs106
 112
Employee benefit obligations314
 304
Asset retirement obligations3,047
 1,702
Other cost of removal obligations497
 609
Other regulatory liabilities, deferred69
 84
Other deferred credits and liabilities58
 63
Total deferred credits and other liabilities9,080
 7,716
Total Liabilities18,962
 16,744
Redeemable Preferred Stock (See accompanying statements)
291
 291
Common Stockholder's Equity (See accompanying statements)
7,477
 6,829
Total Liabilities and Stockholder's Equity$26,730
 $23,864
Commitments and Contingent Matters (See notes)

 
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.


STATEMENTS OF CAPITALIZATION
At December 31, 2018 and 2017
Alabama Power Company 2018 Annual Report
 2018
 2017
 2018
 2017
 (in millions) (percent of total)
Long-Term Debt:       
Long-term debt payable to affiliated trusts —       
Variable rate (5.50% at 12/31/18) due 2042$206
 $206
    
Long-term notes payable —       
5.125% due 2019200
 200
    
3.375% due 2020250
 250
    
2.38% to 3.95% due 2021220
 220
    
2.45% to 5.875% due 2022750
 750
    
3.55% due 2023300
 300
    
2.80% to 6.125% due 2025-20485,175
 4,675
    
Variable rates (3.70% to 3.91% at 12/31/18) due 202125
 25
    
Total long-term notes payable6,920
 6,420
    
Other long-term debt —       
Pollution control revenue bonds —       
1.625% to 2.90% due 2034207
 207
    
Variable rates (1.76% to 1.87% at 12/31/18) due 202165
 65
    
Variable rates (1.70% to 1.80% at 12/31/18) due 2024-2038788
 788
    
Total other long-term debt1,060
 1,060
    
Capitalized lease obligations4
 4
    
Unamortized debt premium (discount), net(12) (11)    
Unamortized debt issuance expense(54) (51)    
Total long-term debt (annual interest requirement — $330 million)8,124
 7,628
    
Less amount due within one year201
 
    
Long-term debt excluding amount due within one year7,923
 7,628
 50.4% 51.7%
Redeemable Preferred Stock:       
Cumulative redeemable preferred stock       
$100 par or stated value — 4.20% to 4.92%       
Authorized — 3,850,000 shares       
Outstanding — 475,115 shares48
 48
    
$1 par value — 5.00%       
Authorized — 27,500,000 shares       
Outstanding — 10,000,000 shares: $25 stated value243
 243
    
Total redeemable preferred stock
(annual dividend requirement — $15 million)
291
 291
 1.9
 2.0
Common Stockholder's Equity:       
Common stock, par value $40 per share —       
Authorized — 40,000,000 shares       
Outstanding — 30,537,500 shares1,222
 1,222
    
Paid-in capital3,508
 2,986
    
Retained earnings2,775
 2,647
    
Accumulated other comprehensive loss(28) (26)    
Total common stockholder's equity7,477
 6,829
 47.7
 46.3
Total Capitalization$15,691
 $14,748
 100.0% 100.0%
 The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.


STATEMENTS OF COMMON STOCKHOLDER'S EQUITY
For the Years Ended December 31, 2018, 2017, and 2016
Alabama Power Company 2018 Annual Report

 
Number of
Common
Shares
Issued
 
Common
Stock
 
Paid-In
Capital
 
Retained
Earnings
 
Accumulated
Other
Comprehensive
Income (Loss)
 Total
 (in millions)
Balance at December 31, 201531
 $1,222
 $2,341
 $2,461
 $(32) $5,992
Net income after dividends on
preferred and preference stock

 
 
 822
 
 822
Capital contributions from parent company
 
 272
 
 
 272
Other comprehensive income (loss)
 
 
 
 2
 2
Cash dividends on common stock
 
 
 (765) 
 (765)
Balance at December 31, 201631
 1,222
 2,613
 2,518
 (30) 6,323
Net income after dividends on
preferred and preference stock

 
 
 848
 
 848
Capital contributions from parent company
 
 373
 
 
 373
Other comprehensive income (loss)
 
 
 
 4
 4
Cash dividends on common stock
 
 
 (714) 
 (714)
Other
 
 
 (5) 
 (5)
Balance at December 31, 201731
 1,222
 2,986
 2,647
 (26) 6,829
Net income after dividends on
preferred and preference stock

 
 
 930
 
 930
Capital contributions from parent company
 
 522
 
 
 522
Other comprehensive income (loss)
 
 
 
 4
 4
Cash dividends on common stock
 
 
 (801) 
 (801)
Other
 
 
 (1) (6) (7)
Balance at December 31, 201831
 $1,222
 $3,508
 $2,775
 $(28) $7,477
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.



REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
To the stockholder and the Board of Directors of Georgia Power Company
Opinion on the Financial Statements
We have audited the accompanying balance sheets and statements of capitalization of Georgia Power Company (Georgia Power) (a wholly-owned subsidiary of The Southern Company) as of December 31, 2018 and 2017, the related statements of income, comprehensive income, common stockholder's equity, and cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2018, and the related notes (collectively referred to as the "financial statements"). In our opinion, the financial statements present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Georgia Power as of December 31, 2018 and 2017, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2018, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.
Basis for Opinion
These financial statements are the responsibility of Georgia Power's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on Georgia Power's financial statements based on our audits. We are a public accounting firm registered with the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (PCAOB) and are required to be independent with respect to Georgia Power in accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.
We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement, whether due to error or fraud. Georgia Power is not required to have, nor were we engaged to perform, an audit of its internal control over financial reporting. As part of our audits, we are required to obtain an understanding of internal control over financial reporting but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of Georgia Power's internal control over financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion.
Our audits included performing procedures to assess the risks of material misstatement of the financial statements, whether due to error or fraud, and performing procedures that respond to those risks. Such procedures included examining, on a test basis, evidence regarding the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. Our audits also included evaluating the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the financial statements. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
/s/ Deloitte & Touche LLP
Atlanta, Georgia
February 20, 201819, 2019
We have served as the Company'sGeorgia Power's auditor since 2002.

DEFINITIONS
TermMeaning
AFUDCAllowance for funds used during construction
Alabama PowerAlabama Power Company
AROAsset retirement obligation
ASCAccounting Standards Codification
ASUAccounting Standards Update
CCRCoal combustion residuals
Clean Air ActClean Air Act Amendments of 1990
CO2
Carbon dioxide
EPAU.S. Environmental Protection Agency
FASBFinancial Accounting Standards Board
FERCFederal Energy Regulatory Commission
GAAPU.S. generally accepted accounting principles
Georgia PowerGeorgia Power Company
IRSInternal Revenue Service
ITCInvestment tax credit
KWHKilowatt-hour
Mississippi PowerMississippi Power Company
mmBtuMillion British thermal units
Moody'sMoody's Investors Service, Inc.
MWMegawatt
NOX
Nitrogen oxide
OCIOther comprehensive income
power poolThe operating arrangement whereby the integrated generating resources of the traditional electric operating companies and Southern Power (excluding subsidiaries) are subject to joint commitment and dispatch in order to serve their combined load obligations
PPAPower purchase agreement
PSCPublic Service Commission
ROEReturn on equity
S&PS&P Global Ratings, a division of S&P Global Inc.
scrubberFlue gas desulfurization system
SCSSouthern Company Services, Inc. (the Southern Company system service company)
SECU.S. Securities and Exchange Commission
SO2
Sulfur dioxide
Southern CompanyThe Southern Company
Southern Company GasSouthern Company Gas and its subsidiaries
Southern Company systemSouthern Company, the traditional electric operating companies, Southern Power, Southern Company Gas (as of July 1, 2016), Southern Electric Generating Company, Southern Nuclear, SCS, Southern Linc, PowerSecure, Inc. (as of May 9, 2016), and other subsidiaries
Southern LincSouthern Communications Services, Inc.
Southern NuclearSouthern Nuclear Operating Company, Inc.
Southern PowerSouthern Power Company and its subsidiaries
Tax Reform LegislationThe Tax Cuts and Jobs Act, which was signed into law on December 22, 2017 and became effective on January 1, 2018
traditional electric operating companiesAlabama Power, Georgia Power, Gulf Power Company, and Mississippi Power

MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
Gulf Power Company 2017 Annual Report
OVERVIEW
Business Activities
Gulf Power Company (the Company) operates as a vertically integrated utility providing electric service to retail customers within its traditional service territory located in northwest Florida and to wholesale customers in the Southeast.
Many factors affect the opportunities, challenges, and risks of the Company's business of providing electric service. These factors include the ability to maintain a constructive regulatory environment, to maintain and grow energy sales and customers, and to effectively manage and secure timely recovery of costs. These costs include those related to projected long-term demand growth, stringent environmental standards, reliability, restoration following major storms, fuel, and capital expenditures. The Company has various regulatory mechanisms that operate to address cost recovery. Effectively operating pursuant to these regulatory mechanisms and appropriately balancing required costs and capital expenditures with customer prices will continue to challenge the Company for the foreseeable future.
On April 4, 2017, the Florida PSC approved a settlement agreement (2017 Rate Case Settlement Agreement) among the Company and three intervenors with respect to the Company's request in 2016 to increase retail base rates. Among the terms of the 2017 Rate Case Settlement Agreement, the Company increased rates effective with the first billing cycle in July 2017 to provide an annual overall net customer impact of approximately $54.3 million. The net customer impact consisted of a $62.0 million increase in annual base revenues, less an annual purchased power capacity cost recovery clause credit for certain wholesale revenues of approximately $8 million through December 2019. In addition, the Company continued its authorized retail ROE midpoint (10.25%) and range (9.25% to 11.25%), is deemed to have a maximum equity ratio of 52.5% for all retail regulatory purposes, and implemented new dismantlement accruals effective July 1, 2017. The Company also began amortizing the regulatory asset associated with the investment balances remaining after the retirement of Plant Smith Units 1 and 2 (357 MWs) over 15 years effective January 1, 2018 and implemented new depreciation rates effective January 1, 2018. The 2017 Rate Case Settlement Agreement also resulted in a $32.5 million write-down of the Company's ownership of Plant Scherer Unit 3 (205 MWs), which was recorded in the first quarter 2017. The remaining issues related to the inclusion of the Company's investment in Plant Scherer Unit 3 in retail rates have been resolved as a result of the 2017 Rate Case Settlement Agreement, including recoverability of certain costs associated with the ongoing ownership and operation of the unit through the environmental cost recovery clause.
The 2017 Rate Case Settlement Agreement set forth a process for addressing the revenue requirement effects of the Tax Reform Legislation through a prospective change to the Company's base rates. Under the terms of the 2017 Rate Case Settlement Agreement, by March 1, 2018, the Company must identify the revenue requirements impacts and defer them to a regulatory asset or regulatory liability to be considered for prospective application in a change to base rates in a limited scope proceeding before the Florida PSC. In lieu of this approach, on February 14, 2018, the parties to the 2017 Rate Case Settlement Agreement filed a new stipulation and settlement agreement (2018 Tax Reform Settlement Agreement) with the Florida PSC. If approved, the 2018 Tax Reform Settlement Agreement will result in annual reductions of $18.2 million to the Company's base rates and $15.6 million to the Company's environmental cost recovery rates effective beginning the first calendar month following approval.
The 2018 Tax Reform Settlement Agreement also provides for a one-time refund of $69.4 million for the retail portion of unprotected (not subject to normalization) deferred tax liabilities through the Company's fuel cost recovery rate over the remainder of 2018. In addition, a limited scope proceeding to address the flow back of protected deferred tax liabilities will be initiated by May 1, 2018 and the Company will record a regulatory liability for the related 2018 amounts eligible to be returned to customers consistent with IRS normalization principles. Unless otherwise agreed to by the parties to the 2018 Tax Reform Settlement Agreement, amounts recorded in this regulatory liability will be refunded to retail customers in 2019 through the Company's fuel cost recovery rate.
If the 2018 Tax Reform Settlement Agreement is approved, the 2017 Rate Case Settlement Agreement will be amended to increase the Company's maximum equity ratio from 52.5% to 53.5% for regulatory purposes.
The ultimate outcome of these matters cannot be determined at this time.
On October 25, 2017, the Florida PSC approved the Company's 2018 annual cost recovery clause factors to provide for a net annual revenue increase of $63 million. See FUTURE EARNINGS POTENTIAL – "Retail Regulatory Matters – Cost Recovery Clauses" herein for additional information.
The Company continues to focus on several key performance indicators including, but not limited to, customer satisfaction, plant availability, system reliability, and net income after dividends on preference stock. The Company's financial success is directly

MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS (continued)
Gulf Power Company 2017 Annual Report

tied to customer satisfaction. Key elements of ensuring customer satisfaction include outstanding service, high reliability, and competitive prices. Management uses customer satisfaction surveys to evaluate the Company's results and generally targets the top quartile of these surveys in measuring performance.
See RESULTS OF OPERATIONS herein for information on the Company's financial performance.
Earnings
The Company's 2017 net income after dividends on preference stock was $135 million, representing a $4 million, or 3.1%, increase over the previous year. The increase was primarily due to higher retail base revenues and lower depreciation, partially offset by a write-down of $32.5 million ($20 million after tax) of the Company's ownership of Plant Scherer Unit 3 resulting from the 2017 Rate Case Settlement Agreement and by higher operations and maintenance expenses as compared to the corresponding period in 2016.
In 2016, the net income after dividends on preference stock was $131 million, representing a $17 million, or 11.5%, decrease over the previous year. The decrease was primarily due to lower wholesale revenues and higher depreciation, partially offset by higher retail revenues and lower operations and maintenance expenses as compared to the corresponding period in 2015.
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
A condensed statement of income follows:
 Amount 
Increase (Decrease)
from Prior Year
 2017 2017 2016
 (in millions)
Operating revenues$1,516
 $31
 $2
Fuel427
 (5) (13)
Purchased power155
 13
 7
Other operations and maintenance359
 23
 (18)
Depreciation and amortization137
 (35) 31
Taxes other than income taxes116
 (4) 2
Loss on Plant Scherer Unit 333
 33
 
Total operating expenses1,227
 25
 9
Operating income289
 6
 (7)
Total other income and (expense)(60) (8) (11)
Income taxes90
 (1) (1)
Net income139
 (1) (17)
Dividends on preference stock4
 (5) 
Net income after dividends on preference stock$135
 $4
 $(17)

MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS (continued)
Gulf Power Company 2017 Annual Report

Operating Revenues
Operating revenues for 2017 were $1.52 billion, reflecting an increase of $31 million from 2016. Details of operating revenues were as follows:
 Amount
 2017 2016
 (in millions)
Retail — prior year$1,281
 $1,249
Estimated change resulting from –   
Rates and pricing40
 30
Sales growth2
 
Weather(11) 1
Fuel and other cost recovery(31) 1
Retail — current year1,281
 1,281
Wholesale revenues –   
Non-affiliates57
 61
Affiliates108
 75
Total wholesale revenues165
 136
Other operating revenues70
 68
Total operating revenues$1,516
 $1,485
Percent change2.1% N/M
N/M - Not meaningful
In 2017, retail revenues remained flat when compared to 2016 primarily due to an increase in retail base revenues effective with the first billing cycle in July 2017, offset by decreases in fuel and purchased power capacity clause revenues and the impact of milder weather. In 2016, retail revenues increased $32 million, or 2.6%, when compared to 2015 primarily as a result of an increase in the Company's environmental cost recovery clause revenues, partially offset by a decrease in the energy conservation clause revenues. See "Energy Sales" below for a discussion of changes in the volume of energy sold, including changes related to sales growth and weather.
In 2017, revenues associated with changes in rates and pricing increased primarily due to an increase in retail base rates effective with the first billing cycle in July 2017. In 2016, revenues associated with changes in rates and pricing increased primarily due to an increase in the environmental cost recovery clause as a result of additional rate base investment related to environmental compliance equipment placed in service at the end of 2015 as well as portions of the Company's ownership in Plant Scherer Unit 3 that were rededicated to retail service in 2016. Annually, the Company petitions the Florida PSC for recovery of projected environmental and energy conservation costs, including any true-up amount from prior periods, and approved rates are implemented each January. The recovery provisions include related expenses and a return on average net investment.
Fuel and other cost recovery provisions include fuel expenses, the energy component of purchased power costs, purchased power capacity costs, the difference between projected and actual costs and revenues related to energy conservation and environmental compliance, and a credit for certain wholesale revenues as a result of the 2017 Rate Case Settlement Agreement. Annually, the Company petitions the Florida PSC for recovery of projected fuel and purchased power costs, including any true-up amount from prior periods, and approved rates are implemented each January. The recovery provisions generally equal the related expenses and have no material effect on earnings.
See Note 1 to the financial statements under "Revenues" and Note 3 to the financial statements under "Retail Regulatory Matters" for additional information regarding the Company's retail base rate cases, cost recovery clauses, and related rate changes.

MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS (continued)
Gulf Power Company 2017 Annual Report

Wholesale revenues from power sales to non-affiliated utilities were as follows:
 2017 2016 2015
 (in millions)
Capacity and other$25
 $30
 $67
Energy32
 31
 40
Total non-affiliated$57
 $61
 $107
Wholesale revenues from sales to non-affiliates consist of long-term sales agreements to other utilities in Florida and Georgia and short-term opportunity sales. Capacity revenues from long-term sales agreements represent the greatest contribution to net income. The energy is generally sold at variable cost. Short-term opportunity sales are made at market-based rates that generally provide a margin above the Company's variable cost of energy. Wholesale energy revenues from sales to non-affiliates will vary depending on fuel prices, the market prices of wholesale energy compared to the cost of the Company's and the Southern Company system's generation, demand for energy within the Southern Company system's electric service territory, and the availability of the Southern Company system's generation.
In 2017, wholesale revenues from sales to non-affiliates decreased $4 million, or 6.6%, as compared to the prior year primarily due to a 16.0% decrease in capacity revenues resulting from the expiration of a Plant Scherer Unit 3 long-term sales agreement in 2016. In 2016, wholesale revenues from sales to non-affiliates decreased $46 million, or 43.0%, as compared to the prior year primarily due to a 55.3% decrease in capacity revenues resulting from the expiration of Plant Scherer Unit 3 long-term sales agreements in December 2015 and May 2016.
Wholesale revenues from sales to affiliated companies will vary depending on demand and the availability and cost of generating resources at each company. These affiliate sales are made in accordance with the Intercompany Interchange Contract (IIC), as approved by the FERC. These transactions do not have a significant impact on earnings since the revenue related to these energy sales generally offsets the cost of energy sold. In 2017, wholesale revenues from sales to affiliates increased $33 million, or 44.0%, as compared to the prior year primarily due to a 39.6% increase in KWH sales to affiliates due to the dispatch of the Company's lower cost generation resources to serve system territorial load. In 2016, wholesale revenues from sales to affiliates increased $17 million, or 29.3%, as compared to the prior year primarily due to a 46.1% increase in KWH sales to affiliates due to lower planned unit outages for the Company's generation resources and a 7.9% increase in the price of energy sold to affiliates due to more sales during peak load hours.
Energy Sales
Changes in revenues are influenced heavily by the change in the volume of energy sold from year to year. KWH sales for 2017 and the percent change from the prior year were as follows:
 
Total
KWHs
 
Total KWH
Percent Change
 
Weather-Adjusted
Percent Change
 2017 2017 2016 2017 2016
 (in millions)
        
Residential5,229
 (2.4)% (0.1)% 1.3 % (0.2)%
Commercial3,814
 (1.4) (0.7) 
 (1.5)
Industrial1,740
 (5.0) 1.8
 (5.0) 1.8
Other26
 4.5
 (0.8) 4.5
 (0.8)
Total retail10,809
 (2.5) 
 (0.2)% (0.3)%
Wholesale         
Non-affiliates749
 (0.1) (27.8)    
Affiliates3,887
 39.6
 46.1
    
Total wholesale4,636
 31.2
 20.0
    
Total energy sales15,445
 5.7 % 4.2 %    
Changes in retail energy sales are generally the result of changes in electricity usage by customers, changes in weather, and changes in the number of customers. Retail energy sales decreased 2.5% in 2017 compared to the prior year primarily due to milder weather in the first half of the year, partially offset by customer growth. Weather-adjusted residential KWH sales increased

MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS (continued)
Gulf Power Company 2017 Annual Report

primarily due to customer growth. Weather-adjusted commercial KWH sales remained flat as a result of lower customer usage primarily resulting from efficiency improvements in appliances and lighting, offset by customer growth. Industrial KWH sales decreased in 2017 compared to 2016 primarily due to changes in customers' operations and energy efficiency improvements.
Residential and commercial KWH sales decreased in 2016 compared to 2015 due to declining use per customer primarily resulting from energy efficiency improvements, partially offset by customer growth and warmer weather during the third quarter. Industrial KWH sales increased in 2016 compared to 2015 primarily due to decreased customer co-generation, partially offset by changes in customers' operations.
See "Operating Revenues" above for a discussion of significant changes in wholesale sales to non-affiliates and affiliated companies.
Fuel and Purchased Power Expenses
Fuel costs constitute one of the largest expenses for the Company. The mix of fuel sources for generation of electricity is determined primarily by demand, the unit cost of fuel, and the availability of generating units. Additionally, the Company purchases a portion of its electricity needs from the wholesale market.
Details of the Company's generation and purchased power were as follows:
 2017 2016 2015
Total generation (in millions of KWHs)
9,310
 8,259
 8,629
Total purchased power (in millions of KWHs)
5,991
 6,973
 5,976
Sources of generation (percent) –
     
Coal54
 57
 57
Gas46
 43
 43
Cost of fuel, generated (in cents per net KWH) –
     
Coal3.14
 3.68
 3.88
Gas3.55
 4.17
 4.22
Average cost of fuel, generated (in cents per net KWH)
3.32
 3.89
 4.03
Average cost of purchased power (in cents per net KWH)(*)
4.55
 3.63
 3.89
(*)Average cost of purchased power includes fuel purchased by the Company for tolling agreements where power is generated by the provider.
In 2017, total fuel and purchased power expenses were $582 million, an increase of $8 million, or 1.4%, from the prior year costs. The increase was primarily the result of a $6 million net increase due to a higher volume of KWHs generated and purchased and a $2 million net increase due to a higher average cost of fuel and purchased power.
In 2016, total fuel and purchased power expenses were $574 million, a decrease of $6 million, or 1.0%, from the prior year costs. The decrease was primarily the result of a $30 million decrease due to a lower average cost of fuel and purchased power, largely offset by a $24 million increase due to a higher volume of KWHs generated and purchased.
Fuel and purchased power transactions do not have a significant impact on earnings since energy and capacity expenses are generally offset by energy and capacity revenues through the Company's fuel and purchased power capacity cost recovery clauses and long-term wholesale contracts. See Note 3 to the financial statements under "Retail Regulatory Matters – Cost Recovery Clauses – Retail Fuel Cost Recovery" and " – Purchased Power Capacity Recovery" for additional information.
Fuel
Fuel expense was $427 million in 2017, a decrease of $5 million, or 1.2%, from the prior year costs. The decrease was primarily due to a 14.7% decrease in the average cost of fuel per KWH generated due to lower coal and natural gas prices, partially offset by a 12.7% higher volume of KWHs generated due to the dispatch of the Company's lower cost generation resources to serve system territorial load. In 2016, fuel expense was $432 million, a decrease of $13 million, or 2.9%, from the prior year costs. The decrease was primarily due to a 3.5% decrease in the average cost of fuel per KWH generated due to lower coal and natural gas prices and a 4.3% lower volume of KWHs generated due to an increase in KWHs purchased from lower-cost gas-fired PPA resources.

MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS (continued)
Gulf Power Company 2017 Annual Report

Purchased Power
Purchased power expense was $155 million in 2017, an increase of $13 million, or 9.2%, from the prior year. The increase was primarily due to a 25.3% increase in the average cost per KWH purchased, partially offset by a 14.1% decrease in the volume of KWHs purchased. In 2016, purchased power expense was $142 million, an increase of $7 million, or 5.2%, from the prior year. The increase was primarily due to a 16.7% increase in the volume of KWHs purchased, partially offset by a 6.7% decrease in the average cost per KWH purchased resulting from lower energy costs from gas-fired resources.
Energy purchases from non-affiliates and affiliates will vary depending on the market prices of wholesale energy as compared to the cost of the Southern Company system's generation, demand for energy within the Southern Company system's electric service territory, and the availability of the Southern Company system's generation. Affiliate purchases are made in accordance with the IIC or other contractual agreements, as approved by the FERC.
Other Operations and Maintenance Expenses
In 2017, other operations and maintenance expenses increased $23 million, or 6.8%, compared to the prior year primarily due to increases of $7 million in environmental compliance expenses, $6 million in rate case expense amortization related to the 2017 Rate Case Settlement Agreement, $6 million in routine and planned maintenance at generation facilities, and $3 million in energy services expenses. In 2016, other operations and maintenance expenses decreased $18 million, or 5.1%, compared to the prior year primarily due to decreases of $7 million in marketing incentive programs and $6 million in routine and planned maintenance expenses at generation facilities. Also contributing to the decrease was $4 million in rate case expense amortization recorded in 2015 and a $3 million reduction in employee compensation and benefits expenses including pension costs.
Expenses from energy services and marketing incentive programs did not have a significant impact on earnings since they were generally offset by associated revenues. Rate case expenses were amortized as authorized in the 2017 Rate Case Settlement Agreement and a settlement agreement approved by the Florida PSC in 2013 (2013 Rate Case Settlement Agreement). See Note 3 to the financial statements under "Retail Regulatory Matters – Base Rate Cases" and " – Cost Recovery Clauses" and Note 2 to the financial statements for additional information related to rate case expenses and environmental compliance costs and pension costs, respectively.
Depreciation and Amortization
Depreciation and amortization decreased $35 million, or 20.3%, in 2017 compared to the prior year. The decrease was primarily due to the reduction in depreciation of $34.0 million recorded in 2017, as authorized in the 2013 Rate Case Settlement Agreement. In 2016, depreciation and amortization increased $31 million, or 22.0%, compared to the prior year. The increase was primarily due to a reduction in depreciation of $20.1 million recorded in 2015, as authorized in the 2013 Rate Case Settlement Agreement, and an increase of $9 million primarily attributable to property additions to utility plant. See Note 3 to the financial statements under "Retail Regulatory Matters – Retail Base Rate Cases" for additional information.
Total Other Income and (Expense)
In 2017, total other income and (expense) decreased $8 million, or 15.4%, compared to the prior year primarily due to a $5 million increase in donations and a $3 million increase in interest expense, net of amounts capitalized. The increase in interest expense was primarily due to deferred returns on transmission projects in 2016, which reduced interest expense and were recorded as a regulatory asset, as authorized in the 2013 Rate Case Settlement Agreement. In 2016, total other income and (expense) decreased $11 million, or 26.8%, primarily due to a decrease of $13 million in AFUDC equity related to environmental control projects at generating facilities and transmission projects placed in service in 2015, partially offset by a $2 million decrease in interest expense, net of amounts capitalized, primarily due to the redemption of debt. See Note 1 to the financial statements under "Allowance for Funds Used During Construction" for additional information.
Dividends on Preference Stock
Dividends on preference stock decreased $5 million, or 55.6%, in 2017 compared to the prior year due to the redemption of all preference stock in June 2017. See FINANCIAL CONDITION AND LIQUIDITY – "Financing Activities" herein for additional information.
Effects of Inflation
The Company is subject to rate regulation that is generally based on the recovery of historical and projected costs. The effects of inflation can create an economic loss since the recovery of costs could be in dollars that have less purchasing power. Any adverse effect of inflation on the Company's results of operations has not been substantial in recent years.

MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS (continued)
Gulf Power Company 2017 Annual Report

FUTURE EARNINGS POTENTIAL
General
The Company operates as a vertically integrated utility providing electric service to retail customers within its traditional service territory located in northwest Florida and to wholesale customers in the Southeast. Prices for electricity provided by the Company to retail customers are set by the Florida PSC under cost-based regulatory principles. Prices for wholesale electricity sales, interconnecting transmission lines, and the exchange of electric power are regulated by the FERC. Retail rates and earnings are reviewed and may be adjusted periodically within certain limitations. See ACCOUNTING POLICIES – "Application of Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates – Utility Regulation" herein and Note 3 to the financial statements under "Retail Regulatory Matters" for additional information about regulatory matters.
The results of operations for the past three years are not necessarily indicative of future earnings potential. The level of the Company's future earnings depends on numerous factors that affect the opportunities, challenges, and risks of the Company's business of providing electric service. These factors include the Company's ability to maintain a constructive regulatory environment that continues to allow for the timely recovery of prudently-incurred costs during a time of increasing costs and limited projected demand growth over the next several years. Future earnings will be driven primarily by customer growth. Earnings will also depend upon maintaining and growing sales, considering, among other things, the adoption and/or penetration rates of increasingly energy-efficient technologies due to changes in the minimum allowable equipment efficiencies along with the continuation of changes in customer behavior, both of which could contribute to a net reduction in customer usage. Earnings are subject to a variety of other factors. These factors include weather, competition, energy conservation practiced by customers, the use of alternative energy sources by customers, the price of electricity, the price elasticity of demand, and the rate of economic growth or decline in the Company's service territory. Demand for electricity is primarily driven by the pace of economic growth that may be affected by changes in regional and global economic conditions, which may impact future earnings.
On December 22, 2017, the Tax Reform Legislation was signed into law and became effective on January 1, 2018, which among other things, reduces the federal corporate income tax rate to 21% and changes rates of depreciation and the business interest deduction. See "Income Tax MattersFederal Tax Reform Legislation" and FINANCIAL CONDITION AND LIQUIDITY – "Credit Rating Risk" herein and Notes 3 and 5 to the financial statements for additional information.
Environmental Matters
The Company's operations are regulated by state and federal environmental agencies through a variety of laws and regulations governing air, water, land, and protection of other natural resources. The Company maintains a comprehensive environmental compliance strategy to assess upcoming requirements and compliance costs associated with these environmental laws and regulations. The costs, including capital expenditures and operations and maintenance costs, required to comply with environmental laws and regulations may impact future unit retirement and replacement decisions, results of operations, cash flows, and financial condition. Compliance costs may result from the installation of additional environmental controls, closure and monitoring of CCR facilities, unit retirements, and adding or changing fuel sources for certain existing units, as well as related upgrades to the transmission system. A major portion of these compliance costs are expected to be recovered through existing ratemaking provisions. The ultimate impact of the environmental laws and regulations discussed below will depend on various factors, such as state adoption and implementation of requirements, the availability and cost of any deployed control technology, and the outcome of pending and/or future legal challenges.
New or revised environmental laws and regulations could affect many areas of the Company's operations. The impact of any such changes cannot be determined at this time. Environmental compliance costs could affect earnings if such costs cannot continue to be fully recovered in rates on a timely basis or through long-term wholesale agreements. The State of Florida has statutory provisions that allow a utility to petition the Florida PSC for recovery of prudent environmental compliance costs that are not being recovered through base rates or any other recovery mechanism. The Company's current long-term wholesale agreements contain provisions that permit charging the customer with costs incurred as a result of changes in environmental laws and regulations. Further, increased costs that are recovered through regulated rates could contribute to reduced demand for electricity, which could negatively affect results of operations, cash flows, and financial condition. Additionally, many commercial and industrial customers may also be affected by existing and future environmental requirements, which for some may have the potential to ultimately affect their demand for electricity. See "Other Matters" herein and Note 3 to the financial statements under "Retail Regulatory Matters – Cost Recovery Clauses – Environmental Cost Recovery" for additional information, including a discussion on the State of Florida's statutory provisions on environmental cost recovery.
Through 2017, the Company has invested approximately $2.0 billion in environmental capital retrofit projects to comply with environmental requirements, with annual totals of approximately $30 million, $28 million, and $116 million for 2017, 2016, and 2015, respectively. Although the timing, requirements, and estimated costs could change as environmental laws and regulations

MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS (continued)
Gulf Power Company 2017 Annual Report

are adopted or modified, as compliance plans are revised or updated, and as legal challenges to rules are initiated or completed, the Company's current compliance strategy estimates capital expenditures of $279 million from 2018 through 2022, with annual totals of approximately $65 million, $57 million, $83 million, $58 million, and $16 million for 2018, 2019, 2020, 2021, and 2022, respectively. These estimates do not include any potential compliance costs associated with the regulation of CO2 emissions from fossil fuel-fired electric generating units. See "Global Climate Issues" herein for additional information. The Company also anticipates expenditures associated with ash pond closure and ground water monitoring under the Disposal of Coal Combustion Residuals from Electric Utilities rule (CCR Rule), which are reflected in the Company's ARO liabilities. See FINANCIAL CONDITION AND LIQUIDITY – "Capital Requirements and Contractual Obligations" herein and Note 1 to the financial statements under "Asset Retirement Obligations and Other Costs of Removal" for additional information.
Environmental Laws and Regulations
Air Quality
The EPA has set National Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS) for six air pollutants (carbon monoxide, lead, nitrogen dioxide, ozone, particulate matter, and SO2), which it reviews and revises periodically. Revisions to these standards can require additional emission controls, improvements in control efficiency, or fuel changes which can result in increased compliance and operational costs. NAAQS requirements can also adversely affect the siting of new facilities. In 2015, the EPA published a more stringent eight-hour ozone NAAQS. The EPA plans to complete designations for this rule by no later than April 30, 2018. No areas within the Company's service territory have been or are anticipated to be designated nonattainment under the 2015 ozone NAAQS. In 2010, the EPA revised the NAAQS for SO2, establishing a new one-hour standard, and is completing designations in multiple phases. The EPA has issued several rounds of area designations and no areas in the vicinity of Company-owned SO2 sources have been designated nonattainment under the 2010 one-hour SO2 NAAQS. However, final eight-hour ozone and SO2 one-hour designations for certain areas are still pending and, if other areas are designated as nonattainment in the future, increased compliance costs could result.
In 2011, the EPA finalized the Cross-State Air Pollution Rule (CSAPR) and its NOX annual, NOX seasonal, and SO2 annual programs. CSAPR is an emissions trading program that addresses the impacts of the interstate transport of SO2 and NOX emissions from fossil fuel-fired power plants located in upwind states in the eastern half of the U.S. on air quality in downwind states. The Company has fossil fuel-fired generation subject to these requirements. In October 2016, the EPA published a final rule that revised the CSAPR seasonal NOX program, which completely removed Florida from all CSAPR programs, left the Georgia seasonal NOX budget unchanged, and established more stringent NOX emissions budgets in Mississippi. The outcome of ongoing CSAPR litigation could have an impact on the State of Mississippi's allowance allocations under the CSAPR seasonal NOX program. Increases in either future fossil fuel-fired generation or the cost of CSAPR allowances could have a negative financial impact on results of operations for the Company.
The EPA finalized regional haze regulations in 2005 and 2017. These regulations require states, tribal governments, and various federal agencies to develop and implement plans to reduce pollutants that impair visibility and demonstrate reasonable progress toward the goal of restoring natural visibility conditions in certain areas, including national parks and wilderness areas. States must submit a revised state implementation plan (SIP) to the EPA by July 31, 2021, demonstrating reasonable progress towards achieving visibility improvement goals. State implementation of reasonable progress could require further reductions in SO2 or NOX emissions, which could result in increased compliance costs.
In 2015, the EPA published a final rule requiring certain states (including Florida, Georgia, and Mississippi) to revise or remove the provisions of their SIPs regulating excess emissions at industrial facilities, including electric generating facilities, during periods of startup, shut-down, or malfunction (SSM). The state excess emission rules provide necessary operational flexibility to affected units during periods of SSM and, if removed, could affect unit availability and result in increased operations and maintenance costs for the Company. The EPA has not yet responded to the SIP revisions proposed by states where the Company's generating units are located.
Water Quality
In 2014, the EPA finalized requirements under Section 316(b) of the Clean Water Act (CWA) to regulate cooling water intake structures at existing power plants and manufacturing facilities in order to minimize their effects on fish and other aquatic life. The regulation requires plant-specific studies to determine applicable measures to protect organisms that either get caught on the intake screens (impingement) or are drawn into the cooling system (entrainment). The ultimate impact of this rule will depend on the outcome of these plant-specific studies and any additional protective measures required to be incorporated into each plant's National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit based on site-specific factors.

MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS (continued)
Gulf Power Company 2017 Annual Report

In 2015, the EPA finalized the steam electric effluent limitations guidelines (ELG) rule that set national standards for wastewater discharges from steam electric generating units. The rule prohibits effluent discharges of certain wastestreams and imposes stringent arsenic, mercury, selenium, and nitrate/nitrite limits on scrubber wastewater discharges. The revised technology-based limits and compliance dates may require extensive modifications to existing ash and wastewater management systems or the installation and operation of new ash and wastewater management systems. Compliance with the ELG rule is expected to require capital expenditures and increased operational costs primarily affecting the Company's coal-fired electric generation. Compliance applicability dates range from November 1, 2018 to December 31, 2023 with state environmental agencies incorporating specific applicability dates in the NPDES permitting process based on information provided for each waste stream. The EPA has committed to a new rulemaking that could potentially revise the limitations and applicability dates of the ELG rule. The EPA expects to finalize this rulemaking in 2020.
In 2015, the EPA and the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (Corps) jointly published a final rule that revised the regulatory definition of waters of the United States (WOTUS) for all CWA programs. The rule significantly expanded the scope of federal jurisdiction over waterbodies (such as rivers, streams, and canals), which could impact new generation projects and permitting and reporting requirements associated with the installation, expansion, and maintenance of transmission and distribution projects. On July 27, 2017, the EPA and the Corps proposed to rescind the 2015 WOTUS rule. The WOTUS rule has been stayed by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit since late 2015, but on January 22, 2018, the U.S. Supreme Court determined that federal district courts have jurisdiction over the pending challenges to the rule. On February 6, 2018, the EPA and the Corps published a final rule delaying implementation of the 2015 WOTUS rule to 2020.
In addition, numeric nutrient water quality standards promulgated by the State of Florida to limit the amount of nitrogen and phosphorous allowed in state waters are in effect for the State's streams and estuaries. The impact of these standards will depend on further regulatory action in connection with their site-specific implementation through the State of Florida's NPDES permitting program and Total Maximum Daily Load restoration program and cannot be determined at this time.
Coal Combustion Residuals
In 2015, the EPA finalized non-hazardous solid waste regulations for the disposal of CCR, including coal ash and gypsum, in landfills and surface impoundments (CCR units) at active generating power plants. The CCR Rule requires CCR units to be evaluated against a set of performance criteria and potentially closed if minimum criteria are not met. Closure of existing CCR units could require installation of equipment and infrastructure to manage CCR in accordance with the rule. The EPA has announced plans to reconsider certain portions of the CCR Rule by no later than December 2019, which could result in changes to deadlines and corrective action requirements.
The EPA's reconsideration of the CCR Rule is due in part to a legislative development that impacts the potential oversight role of state agencies. Under the Water Infrastructure Improvements for the Nation Act, which became law in 2016, states are allowed to establish permit programs for implementing the CCR Rule.
Based on cost estimates for closure and monitoring of ash ponds pursuant to the CCR Rule, and the closure of an ash pond at Plant Scholz, the Company recorded AROs for each CCR unit in 2015. As further analysis is performed and closure details are developed, the Company will continue to periodically update these cost estimates as necessary. The estimated costs associated with closure of the ash ponds at Plant Scholz and Plant Smith for 2018 have been approved for recovery through the environmental cost recovery clause. See FINANCIAL CONDITION AND LIQUIDITY – "Capital Requirements and Contractual Obligations" herein and Note 1 to the financial statements under "Asset Retirement Obligations and Other Costs of Removal" for additional information regarding the Company's AROs as of December 31, 2017.
Environmental Remediation
The Company must comply with environmental laws and regulations governing the handling and disposal of waste and releases of hazardous substances. Under these various laws and regulations, the Company could incur substantial costs to clean up affected sites. The Company conducts studies to determine the extent of any required cleanup and has recognized the estimated costs to clean up known affected sites in its financial statements. Included in this amount are costs associated with remediation of the Company's substation sites. These projects have been approved by the Florida PSC for recovery through the environmental cost recovery clause; therefore, these liabilities have no impact to the Company's net income. The Company may be liable for some or all required cleanup costs for additional sites that may require environmental remediation. See Note 3 to the financial statements under "Environmental Matters – Environmental Remediation" for additional information.

MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS (continued)
Gulf Power Company 2017 Annual Report

Global Climate Issues
In 2015, the EPA published final rules limiting CO2 emissions from new, modified, and reconstructed fossil fuel-fired electric generating units and guidelines for states to develop plans to meet EPA-mandated CO2 emission performance standards for existing units (known as the Clean Power Plan or CPP). In February 2016, the U.S. Supreme Court granted a stay of the CPP, which will remain in effect through the resolution of litigation in the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia challenging the legality of the CPP and any review by the U.S. Supreme Court. On March 28, 2017, the U.S. President signed an executive order directing agencies to review actions that potentially burden the development or use of domestically produced energy resources, including review of the CPP and other CO2 emissions rules. On October 10, 2017, the EPA published a proposed rule to repeal the CPP and, on December 28, 2017, published an advanced notice of proposed rulemaking regarding a CPP replacement rule.
In 2015, parties to the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change, including the United States, adopted the Paris Agreement, which established a non-binding universal framework for addressing greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions based on nationally determined contributions. On June 1, 2017, the U.S. President announced that the United States would withdraw from the Paris Agreement and begin renegotiating its terms. The ultimate impact of this agreement or any renegotiated agreement depends on its implementation by participating countries.
The EPA's GHG reporting rule requires annual reporting of GHG emissions expressed in terms of metric tons of CO2 equivalent emissions for a company's operational control of facilities. Based on ownership or financial control of facilities, the Company's 2016 GHG emissions were approximately 8 million metric tons of CO2 equivalent. The preliminary estimate of the Company's 2017 GHG emissions on the same basis is approximately 7 million metric tons of CO2 equivalent.
FERC Matters
The Company has authority from the FERC to sell electricity at market-based rates. Since 2008, that authority, for certain balancing authority areas, has been conditioned on compliance with the requirements of an energy auction, which the FERC found to be tailored mitigation that addresses potential market power concerns. In accordance with FERC regulations governing such authority, the traditional electric operating companies (including the Company) and Southern Power filed a triennial market power analysis in 2014, which included continued reliance on the energy auction as tailored mitigation. In 2015, the FERC issued an order finding that the traditional electric operating companies' (including the Company's) and Southern Power's existing tailored mitigation may not effectively mitigate the potential to exert market power in certain areas served by the traditional electric operating companies and in some adjacent areas. The FERC directed the traditional electric operating companies (including the Company) and Southern Power to show why market-based rate authority should not be revoked in these areas or to provide a mitigation plan to further address market power concerns. The traditional electric operating companies (including the Company) and Southern Power filed a request for rehearing and filed their response with the FERC in 2015.
In December 2016, the traditional electric operating companies (including the Company) and Southern Power filed an amendment to their market-based rate tariff that proposed certain changes to the energy auction, as well as several non-tariff changes. On February 2, 2017, the FERC issued an order accepting all such changes subject to an additional condition of cost-based price caps for certain sales outside of the energy auction, finding that all of these changes would provide adequate alternative mitigation for the traditional electric operating companies' (including the Company's) and Southern Power's potential to exert market power in certain areas served by the traditional electric operating companies (including the Company) and in some adjacent areas. On May 17, 2017, the FERC accepted the traditional electric operating companies' (including the Company's) and Southern Power's compliance filing accepting the terms of the order. While the FERC's February 2, 2017 order references the market power proceeding discussed above, it remains a separate, ongoing matter.
On October 25, 2017, the FERC issued an order in response to the traditional electric operating companies' (including the Company's) and Southern Power's June 29, 2017 triennial updated market power analysis. The FERC directed the traditional electric operating companies (including the Company) and Southern Power to show cause within 60 days why market-based rate authority should not be revoked in certain areas adjacent to the area presently under mitigation in accordance with the February 2, 2017 order or to provide a mitigation plan to further address market power concerns. On November 10, 2017, the traditional electric operating companies (including the Company) and Southern Power responded to the FERC and proposed to resolve matters by applying the alternative mitigation authorized by the February 2, 2017 order to the adjacent areas made the subject of the October 25, 2017 order.
The ultimate outcome of these matters cannot be determined at this time.

MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS (continued)
Gulf Power Company 2017 Annual Report

Retail Regulatory Matters
The Company's rates and charges for service to retail customers are subject to the regulatory oversight of the Florida PSC. The Company's rates are a combination of base rates and several separate cost recovery clauses for specific categories of costs. These separate cost recovery clauses address such items as fuel and purchased energy costs, purchased power capacity costs, energy conservation and demand side management programs, and the costs of compliance with environmental laws and regulations. Costs not addressed through one of the specific cost recovery clauses are recovered through the Company's base rates. See Note 3 to the financial statements under "Retail Regulatory Matters" for additional information.
Retail Base Rate Cases
In the 2013 Rate Case Settlement Agreement, the Florida PSC authorized the Company to reduce depreciation and record a regulatory asset up to $62.5 million from January 2014 through June 2017. In any given month, such depreciation reduction was not to exceed the amount necessary for the retail ROE, as reported to the Florida PSC monthly, to reach the midpoint of the authorized retail ROE range then in effect. For 2014 and 2015, the Company recognized reductions in depreciation of $8.4 million and $20.1 million, respectively. No net reduction in depreciation was recorded in 2016. In 2017, the Company recognized the remaining $34.0 million reduction in depreciation.
On April 4, 2017, the Florida PSC approved the 2017 Rate Case Settlement Agreement among the Company and three intervenors with respect to the Company's request in 2016 to increase retail base rates. Among the terms of the 2017 Rate Case Settlement Agreement, the Company increased rates effective with the first billing cycle in July 2017 to provide an annual overall net customer impact of approximately $54.3 million. The net customer impact consisted of a $62.0 million increase in annual base revenues, less an annual purchased power capacity cost recovery clause credit for certain wholesale revenues of approximately $8 million through December 2019. In addition, the Company continued its authorized retail ROE midpoint (10.25%) and range (9.25% to 11.25%), is deemed to have a maximum equity ratio of 52.5% for all retail regulatory purposes, and implemented new dismantlement accruals effective July 1, 2017. The Company also began amortizing the regulatory asset associated with the investment balances remaining after the retirement of Plant Smith Units 1 and 2 over 15 years effective January 1, 2018 and implemented new depreciation rates effective January 1, 2018. The 2017 Rate Case Settlement Agreement also resulted in a $32.5 million write-down of the Company's ownership of Plant Scherer Unit 3, which was recorded in the first quarter 2017. The remaining issues related to the inclusion of the Company's investment in Plant Scherer Unit 3 in retail rates have been resolved as a result of the 2017 Rate Case Settlement Agreement, including recoverability of certain costs associated with the ongoing ownership and operation of the unit through the environmental cost recovery clause.
The 2017 Rate Case Settlement Agreement set forth a process for addressing the revenue requirement effects of the Tax Reform Legislation through a prospective change to the Company's base rates. Under the terms of the 2017 Rate Case Settlement Agreement, by March 1, 2018, the Company must identify the revenue requirements impacts and defer them to a regulatory asset or regulatory liability to be considered for prospective application in a change to base rates in a limited scope proceeding before the Florida PSC. In lieu of this approach, on February 14, 2018, the parties to the 2017 Rate Case Settlement Agreement filed the 2018 Tax Reform Settlement Agreement with the Florida PSC. If approved, the 2018 Tax Reform Settlement Agreement will result in annual reductions of $18.2 million to the Company's base rates and $15.6 million to the Company's environmental cost recovery rates effective beginning the first calendar month following approval.
The 2018 Tax Reform Settlement Agreement also provides for a one-time refund of $69.4 million for the retail portion of unprotected (not subject to normalization) deferred tax liabilities through the Company's fuel cost recovery rate over the remainder of 2018. In addition, a limited scope proceeding to address the flow back of protected deferred tax liabilities will be initiated by May 1, 2018 and the Company will record a regulatory liability for the related 2018 amounts eligible to be returned to customers consistent with IRS normalization principles. Unless otherwise agreed to by the parties to the 2018 Tax Reform Settlement Agreement, amounts recorded in this regulatory liability will be refunded to retail customers in 2019 through the Company's fuel cost recovery rate.
If the 2018 Tax Reform Settlement Agreement is approved, the 2017 Rate Case Settlement Agreement will be amended to increase the Company's maximum equity ratio from 52.5% to 53.5% for regulatory purposes.
The ultimate outcome of these matters cannot be determined at this time.

MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS (continued)
Gulf Power Company 2017 Annual Report

Cost Recovery Clauses
As discussed previously, the 2017 Rate Case Settlement Agreement resolved the remaining issues related to the Company's inclusion of certain costs associated with the ongoing ownership and operation of Plant Scherer Unit 3 in the environmental cost recovery clause and no adjustment to the environmental cost recovery clause rate approved by the Florida PSC in November 2016 was made.
On October 25, 2017, the Florida PSC approved the Company's annual clause rate request for its fuel, purchased power capacity, environmental, and energy conservation cost recovery factors for 2018. The net effect of the approved changes is a $63 million increase in annual revenues effective in January 2018, the majority of which will be offset by related expense increases.
Revenues for all cost recovery clauses, as recorded on the financial statements, are adjusted for differences in actual recoverable costs and amounts billed in current regulated rates. Accordingly, changes in the billing factor for fuel and purchased power will have no significant effect on the Company's revenues or net income, but will affect annual cash flow. The recovery provisions for environmental compliance and energy conservation include related expenses and a return on net average investment. See Note 1 to the financial statements under "Revenues" for additional information.
Income Tax Matters
Federal Tax Reform Legislation
On December 22, 2017, the Tax Reform Legislation was signed into law and became effective on January 1, 2018. The Tax Reform Legislation, among other things, reduces the federal corporate income tax rate to 21%, retains normalization provisions for public utility property and existing renewable energy incentives, and repeals the corporate alternative minimum tax.
Regulated utility businesses can continue deducting all business interest expense and are not eligible for bonus depreciation on capital assets acquired and placed in service after September 27, 2017. Projects with binding contracts before September 28, 2017 and placed in service after September 27, 2017 remain eligible for bonus depreciation under the Protecting Americans from Tax Hikes (PATH) Act.
In addition, under the Tax Reform Legislation, net operating losses (NOLs) generated after December 31, 2017 can no longer be carried back to previous tax years but can be carried forward indefinitely, with utilization limited to 80% of taxable income in the subsequent tax year.
For the year ended December 31, 2017, implementation of the Tax Reform Legislation resulted in a $25 million decrease in regulatory assets and a $456 million increase in regulatory liabilities, primarily due to the impact of the reduction of the corporate income tax rate on deferred tax assets and liabilities.
The Tax Reform Legislation is subject to further interpretation and guidance from the IRS, as well as each respective state's adoption. In addition, the regulatory treatment of certain impacts of the Tax Reform Legislation is subject to the discretion of the Florida PSC and the FERC. On January 31, 2018, SCS, on behalf of the traditional electric operating companies (including the Company), filed with the FERC a reduction to the Company's open access transmission tariff charge for 2018 to reflect the revised federal corporate tax rate. See Note 3 to the financial statements under "Regulatory Matters" for additional information regarding the Company's rate filing to reflect the impacts of the Tax Reform Legislation.
See FINANCIAL CONDITION AND LIQUIDITY – "Credit Rating Risk" herein and Note 5 to the financial statements under "Current and Deferred Income Taxes" for additional information.
The ultimate outcome of these matters cannot be determined at this time.
Bonus Depreciation
Under the Tax Reform Legislation, projects with binding contracts prior to September 28, 2017 and placed in service after September 27, 2017 remain eligible for bonus depreciation under the PATH Act. The PATH Act allowed for 50% bonus depreciation for 2015 through 2017, 40% bonus depreciation for 2018, and 30% bonus depreciation for 2019 and certain long-lived assets placed in service in 2020. Based on provisional estimates, approximately $20 million of positive cash flows is expected to result from bonus depreciation for the 2017 tax year and approximately $10 million for the 2018 tax year. Should Southern Company have a NOL in 2018, all of these cash flows may not be fully realized in 2018. See Note 5 to the financial statements under "Current and Deferred Income Taxes" for additional information.
Other Matters
As a result of the cost to comply with environmental regulations imposed by the EPA, the Company retired its coal-fired generation at Plant Smith Units 1 and 2 in March 2016. In August 2016, the Florida PSC approved the Company's request to

MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS (continued)
Gulf Power Company 2017 Annual Report

reclassify the remaining net book value of Plant Smith Units 1 and 2 and the remaining materials and supplies associated with these units as of the retirement date, totaling approximately $63 million, to a regulatory asset. The Company began amortizing the investment balances over 15 years effective January 1, 2018 in accordance with the 2017 Rate Case Settlement Agreement.
The Company is involved in various other matters being litigated and regulatory matters that could affect future earnings. In addition, the Company is subject to certain claims and legal actions arising in the ordinary course of business. The Company's business activities are subject to extensive governmental regulation related to public health and the environment, such as regulation of air emissions and water discharges. Litigation over environmental issues and claims of various types, including property damage, personal injury, common law nuisance, and citizen enforcement of environmental requirements, such as standards for air, water, land, and protection of other natural resources, has occurred throughout the U.S. This litigation has included claims for damages alleged to have been caused by CO2 and other emissions, CCR, and alleged exposure to hazardous materials, and/or requests for injunctive relief in connection with such matters. The ultimate outcome of such pending or potential litigation or regulatory matters cannot be predicted at this time; however, for current proceedings not specifically reported herein or in Note 3 to the financial statements, management does not anticipate that the ultimate liabilities, if any, arising from such current proceedings would have a material effect on the Company's financial statements. See Note 3 to the financial statements for a discussion of various other contingencies, regulatory matters, and other matters being litigated which may affect future earnings potential.
ACCOUNTING POLICIES
Application of Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates
The Company prepares its financial statements in accordance with GAAP. Significant accounting policies are described in Note 1 to the financial statements. In the application of these policies, certain estimates are made that may have a material impact on the Company's results of operations and related disclosures. Different assumptions and measurements could produce estimates that are significantly different from those recorded in the financial statements. Senior management has reviewed and discussed the following critical accounting policies and estimates with the Audit Committee of Southern Company's Board of Directors.
Utility Regulation
The Company is subject to retail regulation by the Florida PSC. The Florida PSC sets the rates the Company is permitted to charge customers based on allowable costs. The Company is also subject to cost-based regulation by the FERC with respect to wholesale transmission rates. As a result, the Company applies accounting standards which require the financial statements to reflect the effects of rate regulation. Through the ratemaking process, the regulators may require the inclusion of costs or revenues in periods different than when they would be recognized by a non-regulated company. This treatment may result in the deferral of expenses and the recording of related regulatory assets based on anticipated future recovery through rates or the deferral of gains or creation of liabilities and the recording of related regulatory liabilities. The application of the accounting standards has a further effect on the Company's financial statements as a result of the estimates of allowable costs used in the ratemaking process. These estimates may differ from those actually incurred by the Company; therefore, the accounting estimates inherent in specific costs such as depreciation, AROs, and pension and other postretirement benefits have less of a direct impact on the Company's results of operations and financial condition than they would on a non-regulated company.
As reflected in Note 1 to the financial statements, significant regulatory assets and liabilities have been recorded. Management reviews the ultimate recoverability of these regulatory assets and any requirement to refund these regulatory liabilities based on applicable regulatory guidelines and GAAP. However, adverse legislative, judicial, or regulatory actions could materially impact the amounts of such regulatory assets and liabilities and could adversely impact the Company's financial statements.

MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS (continued)
Gulf Power Company 2017 Annual Report

Federal Tax Reform Legislation
Following the enactment of the Tax Reform Legislation, the SEC staff issued Staff Accounting Bulletin 118 – "Income Tax Accounting Implications of the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act" (SAB 118), which provides for a measurement period of up to one year from the enactment date to complete accounting under GAAP for the tax effects of the legislation. Due to the complex and comprehensive nature of the enacted tax law changes, and their application under GAAP, the Company considers all amounts recorded in the financial statements as a result of the Tax Reform Legislation to be "provisional" as discussed in SAB 118 and subject to revision. The Company is awaiting additional guidance from industry and income tax authorities in order to finalize its accounting. The ultimate impact of the Tax Reform Legislation on deferred income tax assets and liabilities and the related regulatory assets and liabilities cannot be determined at this time. See FUTURE EARNINGS POTENTIAL – "Income Tax Matters – Federal Tax Reform Legislation" herein and Notes 3 and 5 to the financial statements under "Retail Regulatory Matters" and "Current and Deferred Income Taxes," respectively, for additional information.
Asset Retirement Obligations
AROs are computed as the fair value of the estimated ultimate costs for an asset's future retirement and are recorded in the period in which the liability is incurred. The costs are capitalized as part of the related long-lived asset and depreciated over the asset's useful life. In the absence of quoted market prices, AROs are estimated using present value techniques in which estimates of future cash outlays associated with the asset retirements are discounted using a credit-adjusted risk-free rate. Estimates of the timing and amounts of future cash outlays are based on projections of when and how the assets will be retired and the cost of future removal activities.
The liability for AROs primarily relates to the Company's facilities that are subject to the CCR Rule and to the closure of an ash pond at Plant Scholz. In addition, the Company has retirement obligations related to combustion turbines at its Pea Ridge facility, various landfill sites, a barge unloading dock, asbestos removal, and disposal of polychlorinated biphenyls in certain transformers. The Company also has identified retirement obligations related to certain transmission and distribution facilities, certain wireless communication towers, and certain structures authorized by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers. However, liabilities for the removal of these assets have not been recorded because the settlement timing for the retirement obligations related to these assets is indeterminable and, therefore, the fair value of the retirement obligations cannot be reasonably estimated. A liability for these AROs will be recognized when sufficient information becomes available to support a reasonable estimation of the ARO.
The cost estimates for AROs related to the disposal of CCR are based on information using various assumptions related to closure and post-closure costs, timing of future cash outlays, inflation and discount rates, and the potential methods for complying with the CCR Rule requirements for closure for those facilities impacted by the CCR Rule. As further analysis is performed and closure details are developed, the Company will continue to periodically update these cost estimates as necessary. See FUTURE EARNINGS POTENTIAL – "Environmental Matters – Environmental Laws and Regulations – Coal Combustion Residuals" herein and Note 1 to the financial statements under "Asset Retirement Obligations and Other Costs of Removal" for additional information.
Given the significant judgment involved in estimating AROs, the Company considers the liabilities for AROs to be critical accounting estimates.
Pension and Other Postretirement Benefits
The Company's calculation of pension and other postretirement benefits expense is dependent on a number of assumptions. These assumptions include discount rates, healthcare cost trend rates, expected long-term return on plan assets, mortality rates, expected salary and wage increases, and other factors. Components of pension and other postretirement benefits expense include interest and service cost on the pension and other postretirement benefit plans, expected return on plan assets, and amortization of certain unrecognized costs and obligations. Actual results that differ from the assumptions utilized are accumulated and amortized over future periods and, therefore, generally affect recognized expense and the recorded obligation in future periods. While the Company believes that the assumptions used are appropriate, differences in actual experience or significant changes in assumptions would affect its pension and other postretirement benefits costs and obligations.
Key elements in determining the Company's pension and other postretirement benefit expense are the expected long-term return on plan assets and the discount rate used to measure the benefit plan obligations and the periodic benefit plan expense for future periods. The expected long-term return on pension and other postretirement benefit plan assets is based on the Company's investment strategy, historical experience, and expectations for long-term rates of return that consider external actuarial advice. The Company determines the long-term return on plan assets by applying the long-term rate of expected returns on various asset classes to the Company's target asset allocation. For purposes of determining its liability related to the pension and other postretirement benefit plans, the Company discounts the future related cash flows using a single-point discount rate developed

MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS (continued)
Gulf Power Company 2017 Annual Report

from the weighted average of market-observed yields for high quality fixed income securities with maturities that correspond to expected benefit payments. For 2015 and prior years, the Company computed the interest cost component of its net periodic pension and other postretirement benefit plan expense using the same single-point discount rate. Beginning in 2016, the Company adopted a full yield curve approach for calculating the interest cost component whereby the discount rate for each year is applied to the liability for that specific year. As a result, the interest cost component of net periodic pension and other postretirement benefit plan expense decreased by approximately $4 million in 2016.
A 25 basis point change in any significant assumption (discount rate, salaries, or long-term return on plan assets) would result in a $2 million or less change in total annual benefit expense and a $25 million or less change in projected obligations.
See Note 2 to the financial statements for additional information regarding pension and other postretirement benefits.
Contingent Obligations
The Company is subject to a number of federal and state laws and regulations, as well as other factors and conditions that subject it to environmental, litigation, and other risks. See FUTURE EARNINGS POTENTIAL herein and Note 3 to the financial statements for more information regarding certain of these contingencies. The Company periodically evaluates its exposure to such risks and records reserves for those matters where a non-tax-related loss is considered probable and reasonably estimable. The adequacy of reserves can be significantly affected by external events or conditions that can be unpredictable; thus, the ultimate outcome of such matters could materially affect the Company's results of operations, cash flows, or financial condition.
Recently Issued Accounting Standards
Revenue
In 2014, the FASB issued ASC 606, Revenue from Contracts with Customers (ASC 606), replacing the existing accounting standard and industry specific guidance for revenue recognition with a five-step model for recognizing and measuring revenue from contracts with customers. The underlying principle of the new standard is to recognize revenue to depict the transfer of goods or services to customers at the amount expected to be collected. The new standard also requires enhanced disclosures regarding the nature, amount, timing, and uncertainty of revenue and the related cash flows arising from contracts with customers.
Most of the Company's revenue, including energy provided to customers, is from tariff offerings that provide electricity without a defined contractual term, as well as longer-term contractual commitments, including PPAs.
The Company has completed the evaluation of all revenue streams and determined that the adoption of ASC 606 will not change the current timing of revenue recognition for such transactions. Some revenue arrangements, such as energy-related derivatives, are excluded from the scope of ASC 606 and, therefore, will be accounted for and disclosed separately from revenues under ASC 606. The Company has concluded contributions in aid of construction are not in scope for ASC 606 and will continue to be accounted for as an offset to property, plant, and equipment.
The new standard is effective for reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2017. The Company applied the modified retrospective method of adoption effective January 1, 2018. The Company also utilized practical expedients which allowed it to apply the standard to open contracts at the date of adoption and to reflect the aggregate effect of all modifications when identifying performance obligations and allocating the transaction price for contracts modified before the effective date. Under the modified retrospective method of adoption, prior year reported results are not restated; however, a cumulative-effect adjustment to retained earnings at January 1, 2018 is recorded. In addition, quarterly disclosures will include comparative information on 2018 financial statement line items under current guidance. The adoption of ASC 606 did not result in a cumulative-effect adjustment.
Leases
In February 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-02, Leases (Topic 842) (ASU 2016-02). ASU 2016-02 requires lessees to recognize on the balance sheet a lease liability and a right-of-use asset for all leases. ASU 2016-02 also changes the recognition, measurement, and presentation of expense associated with leases and provides clarification regarding the identification of certain components of contracts that would represent a lease. The accounting required by lessors is relatively unchanged. ASU 2016-02 is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2018 and the Company will adopt the new standard effective January 1, 2019.
The Company is currently implementing an information technology system along with the related changes to internal controls and accounting policies that will support the accounting for leases under ASU 2016-02. In addition, the Company has substantially completed a detailed inventory and analysis of its leases. In terms of rental charges and duration of contracts, the most significant leases relate to a PPA, cellular towers, and barges where the Company is the lessee and to outdoor lighting and power distribution equipment where the Company is the lessor. The Company is currently analyzing pole attachment agreements and a lease

MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS (continued)
Gulf Power Company 2017 Annual Report

determination has not been made at this time. While the Company has not yet determined the ultimate impact, adoption of ASU 2016-02 is expected to have a significant impact on the Company's balance sheet.
Other
On March 10, 2017, the FASB issued ASU No. 2017-07, Compensation – Retirement Benefits (Topic 715): Improving the Presentation of Net Periodic Pension Cost and Net Periodic Postretirement Benefit Cost (ASU 2017-07). ASU 2017-07 requires that an employer report the service cost component in the same line item or items as other compensation costs and requires the other components of net periodic pension and postretirement benefit costs to be separately presented in the income statement outside of income from operations. Additionally, only the service cost component is eligible for capitalization, when applicable. However, all cost components remain eligible for capitalization under FERC regulations. ASU 2017-07 will be applied retrospectively for the presentation of the service cost component and the other components of net periodic pension and postretirement benefit costs in the income statement. The capitalization of only the service cost component of net periodic pension and postretirement benefit costs in assets will be applied on a prospective basis. ASU 2017-07 is effective for periods beginning after December 15, 2017. The presentation changes required for net periodic pension and postretirement benefit costs will result in a decrease in the Company's operating income and an increase in other income for 2016 and 2017 and are expected to result in a decrease in operating income and an increase in other income for 2018. The Company adopted ASU 2017-07 effective January 1, 2018 with no material impact on its financial statements.
On August 28, 2017, the FASB issued ASU No. 2017-12, Derivatives and Hedging (Topic 815): Targeted Improvements to Accounting for Hedging Activities (ASU 2017-12), amending the hedge accounting recognition and presentation requirements. ASU 2017-12 makes more financial and non-financial hedging strategies eligible for hedge accounting, amends the related presentation and disclosure requirements, and simplifies hedge effectiveness assessment requirements. ASU 2017-12 is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2018, with early adoption permitted. The Company adopted ASU 2017-12 effective January 1, 2018 with no material impact on its financial statements.
FINANCIAL CONDITION AND LIQUIDITY
Overview
The Company's financial condition remained stable at December 31, 2017. The Company's cash requirements primarily consist of funding ongoing operations, common stock dividends, capital expenditures, and debt maturities. Capital expenditures and other investing activities include investments to meet projected long-term demand requirements, to maintain existing facilities, to comply with environmental regulations including adding environmental modifications to existing generating units, to expand and improve transmission and distribution facilities, and for restoration following major storms. Operating cash flows provide a substantial portion of the Company's cash needs. For the three-year period from 2018 through 2020, the Company's projected common stock dividends, capital expenditures, and debt maturities are expected to exceed operating cash flows. The Company plans to finance future cash needs in excess of its operating cash flows primarily through external security issuances, equity contributions from Southern Company, and borrowings from financial institutions. The Company plans to use commercial paper to manage seasonal variations in operating cash flows and for other working capital needs. The Company intends to continue to monitor its access to short-term and long-term capital markets as well as bank credit agreements to meet future capital and liquidity needs. See "Sources of Capital," "Financing Activities," and "Capital Requirements and Contractual Obligations" herein for additional information.
The Company's investments in the qualified pension plan increased in value as of December 31, 2017 as compared to December 31, 2016. No contributions to the qualified pension plan were made for the year ended December 31, 2017 and no mandatory contributions to the qualified pension plan are anticipated during 2018. See Note 2 to the financial statements under "Pension Plans" for additional information.
Net cash provided from operating activities totaled $356 million in 2017, a decrease of $23 million from 2016, primarily due to decreases in cash flows related to the timing of fossil fuel stock purchases and clause recovery, partially offset by increases related to voluntary contributions to the qualified pension plan in 2016. Net cash provided from operating activities totaled $379 million in 2016, a decrease of $81 million from 2015, primarily due to decreases in cash flows related to clause recovery and a voluntary contribution to the qualified pension plan, partially offset by the timing of fossil fuel stock purchases.
Net cash used for investing activities totaled $234 million, $180 million, and $281 million for 2017, 2016, and 2015, respectively. The changes in cash used for investing activities were primarily related to gross property additions for environmental, distribution, steam generation, and transmission assets. Funds for the Company's property additions were provided by operating activities, capital contributions, and other financing activities.

MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS (continued)
Gulf Power Company 2017 Annual Report

Net cash used for financing activities totaled $150 million in 2017 primarily due to the payment of short-term debt, the payment of common stock dividends, and the redemption of preferred stock, partially offset by the proceeds of the issuance of long-term debt and common stock. Net cash used for financing activities totaled $217 million in 2016 primarily due to the redemptions of long-term debt and the payment of common stock dividends, partially offset by an increase in notes payable. Net cash used for financing activities totaled $144 million in 2015 primarily due to the payment of common stock dividends and redemptions of long-term debt, partially offset by an increase in notes payable and proceeds from the issuance of common stock to Southern Company. Fluctuations in cash flow from financing activities vary from year to year based on capital needs and the maturity or redemption of securities.
Significant balance sheet changes in 2017 primarily reflect the financing activities described above. Other significant changes, which resulted from the Tax Reform Legislation, included an increase in deferred credits related to income taxes and a decrease in accumulated deferred income taxes. See FUTURE EARNINGS POTENTIAL – "Income Tax Matters – Federal Tax Reform Legislation" herein and Notes 3 and 5 to the financial statements under "Retail Regulatory Matters" and "Current and Deferred Income Taxes," respectively, for additional information and related proposed regulatory treatment.
The Company's ratio of common equity to total capitalization plus short-term debt, was 53.5% and 48.3% at December 31, 2017 and 2016, respectively. See Note 6 to the financial statements for additional information.
Sources of Capital
The Company plans to obtain the funds required to meet its future capital needs from sources similar to those used in the past, which were primarily from operating cash flows, external security issuances, borrowings from financial institutions, and equity contributions from Southern Company. However, the amount, type, and timing of any future financings, if needed, will depend upon regulatory approval, prevailing market conditions, and other factors.
The issuance of securities by the Company is subject to annual approval by the Florida PSC. Additionally, with respect to the public offering of securities, the Company files registration statements with the SEC under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (1933 Act). The amounts of securities authorized by the Florida PSC, as well as the amounts registered under the 1933 Act, are continuously monitored and appropriate filings are made to ensure flexibility in the capital markets.
The Company obtains financing separately without credit support from any affiliate. See Note 6 to the financial statements under "Bank Credit Arrangements" for additional information. The Southern Company system does not maintain a centralized cash or money pool. Therefore, funds of the Company are not commingled with funds of any other company in the Southern Company system.
The Company's current liabilities may exceed current assets because of scheduled maturities of long-term debt and the periodic use of short-term debt as a funding source, as well as significant seasonal fluctuations in cash needs.
The Company intends to utilize operating cash flows, external security issuances, and borrowings from financial institutions to fund its short-term capital needs. The Company has substantial cash flow from operating activities and access to the capital markets and financial institutions to meet short-term liquidity needs.
At December 31, 2017, the Company had approximately $28 million of cash and cash equivalents. Committed credit arrangements with banks at December 31, 2017 were as follows:
Expires     
Executable
Term Loans
 Expires Within One Year
201820192020 Total Unused 
One
Year
 
Two
Years
 Term Out No Term Out
(in millions) (in millions) (in millions) (in millions)
$30$25$225 $280 $280 $45 $— $20 $10
See Note 6 to the financial statements under "Bank Credit Arrangements" for additional information.
In November 2017, the Company amended $195 million of its multi-year credit arrangements to extend the maturity dates from 2017 and 2018 to 2020.
Most of these bank credit arrangements contain covenants that limit debt levels and contain cross-acceleration provisions to other indebtedness (including guarantee obligations) of the Company. Such cross-acceleration provisions to other indebtedness would trigger an event of default if the Company defaulted on indebtedness, the payment of which was then accelerated. At December 31, 2017, the Company was in compliance with all such covenants. None of the bank credit arrangements contain material adverse change clauses at the time of borrowings.

MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS (continued)
Gulf Power Company 2017 Annual Report

Subject to applicable market conditions, the Company expects to renew or replace its bank credit arrangements, as needed, prior to expiration. In connection therewith, the Company may extend the maturity dates and/or increase or decrease the lending commitments thereunder.
Most of the unused credit arrangements with banks are allocated to provide liquidity support to the Company's pollution control revenue bonds and commercial paper program. The amount of variable rate pollution control revenue bonds outstanding requiring liquidity support as of December 31, 2017 was approximately $82 million. In addition, at December 31, 2017, the Company had $75 million of fixed rate pollution control revenue bonds outstanding that were required to be remarketed within the next 12 months.
The Company may also meet short-term cash needs through a Southern Company subsidiary organized to issue and sell commercial paper at the request and for the benefit of the Company and the other traditional electric operating companies. Proceeds from such issuances for the benefit of the Company are loaned directly to the Company. The obligations of each traditional electric operating company under these arrangements are several and there is no cross-affiliate credit support. Short-term borrowings are included in notes payable on the balance sheets.
Details of short-term borrowings were as follows:
 Short-term Debt at the End of the Period 
Short-term Debt During the Period (*)
 Amount Outstanding Weighted Average Interest Rate Average Amount Outstanding Weighted Average Interest Rate Maximum Amount Outstanding
 (in millions)   (in millions)   (in millions)
December 31, 2017         
Commercial paper$45
 2.0% $20
 1.3% $168
Short-term bank debt
 % 38
 1.6% 100
Total$45
 2.0% $58
 1.5%  
December 31, 2016         
Commercial paper$168
 1.1% $53
 0.9% $168
Short-term bank debt100
 1.5% 64
 1.3% 100
Total$268
 1.2% $117
 1.1%  
December 31, 2015         
Commercial paper$142
 0.7% $101
 0.4% $175
Short-term bank debt
 % 10
 0.7% 40
Total$142
 0.7% $111
 0.4%  
(*)Average and maximum amounts are based upon daily balances during the year.
The Company believes the need for working capital can be adequately met by utilizing the commercial paper program, lines of credit, short-term bank term loans, and operating cash flows.
Financing Activities
In January 2017, the Company issued 1,750,000 shares of common stock to Southern Company and realized proceeds of $175 million. The proceeds were used for general corporate purposes, including the Company's continuous construction program.
In March 2017, the Company extended the maturity of a $100 million short-term floating rate bank loan bearing interest based on one-month LIBOR from April 2017 to October 2017 and subsequently repaid the loan in May 2017.
In May 2017, the Company issued $300 million aggregate principal amount of Series 2017A 3.30% Senior Notes due May 30, 2027. The proceeds, together with other funds, were used to repay at maturity $85 million aggregate principal amount of Series 2007A 5.90% Senior Notes due June 15, 2017; to repay outstanding commercial paper borrowings; to repay a $100 million short-term floating rate bank loan, as discussed above; and to redeem, in June 2017, 550,000 shares ($55 million aggregate liquidation amount) of 6.00% Series Preference Stock, 450,000 shares ($45 million aggregate liquidation amount) of Series 2007A 6.45% Preference Stock, and 500,000 shares ($50 million aggregate liquidation amount) of Series 2013A 5.60% Preference Stock.

MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS (continued)
Gulf Power Company 2017 Annual Report

In addition to any financings that may be necessary to meet capital requirements, contractual obligations, and storm recovery, the Company plans to continue, when economically feasible, a program to retire higher-cost securities and replace these obligations with lower-cost capital if market conditions permit.
Credit Rating Risk
At December 31, 2017, the Company did not have any credit arrangements that would require material changes in payment schedules or terminations as a result of a credit rating downgrade.
There are certain contracts that could require collateral, but not accelerated payment, in the event of a credit rating change to BBB- and/or Baa3 or below. These contracts are for physical electricity purchases and sales, fuel transportation and storage, and energy price risk management.
The maximum potential collateral requirements under these contracts at December 31, 2017 were as follows:
Credit Ratings
Maximum
Potential
Collateral
Requirements
 (in millions)
At BBB- and/or Baa3$167
Below BBB- and/or Baa3$562
Included in these amounts are certain agreements that could require collateral in the event that Alabama Power or Georgia Power has a credit rating change to below investment grade. Generally, collateral may be provided by a Southern Company guaranty, letter of credit, or cash. Additionally, a credit rating downgrade could impact the ability of the Company to access capital markets and would be likely to impact the cost at which it does so.
On March 24, 2017, S&P revised its consolidated credit rating outlook for Southern Company and its subsidiaries (including the Company) from stable to negative.
While it is unclear how the credit rating agencies, the FERC, and the Florida PSC may respond to the Tax Reform Legislation, certain financial metrics, such as the funds from operations to debt percentage, used by the credit rating agencies to assess Southern Company and its subsidiaries, including the Company, may be negatively impacted. The Company intends to work with the Florida PSC, including working towards approval of the 2018 Tax Reform Settlement Agreement, to mitigate the adverse impacts, if any, to certain credit metrics. See Note 3 to the financial statements under "Retail Regulatory Matters" for additional information.
Market Price Risk
Due to cost-based rate regulation and other various cost recovery mechanisms, the Company continues to have limited exposure to market volatility in interest rates, commodity fuel prices, and prices of electricity. To manage the volatility attributable to these exposures, the Company nets the exposures, where possible, to take advantage of natural offsets and may enter into various derivative transactions for the remaining exposures pursuant to the Company's policies in areas such as counterparty exposure and risk management practices. The Company's policy is that derivatives are to be used primarily for hedging purposes and mandates strict adherence to all applicable risk management policies. Derivative positions are monitored using techniques including, but not limited to, market valuation, value at risk, stress testing, and sensitivity analysis.
To mitigate future exposure to changes in interest rates, the Company may enter into derivatives which are designated as hedges. The weighted average interest rate on $82 million of outstanding variable rate long-term debt that has not been hedged at December 31, 2017 was 1.85%. If the Company sustained a 100 basis point change in interest rates for all variable rate long-term debt, the change would not materially affect annualized interest expense at December 31, 2017. See Note 1 to the financial statements under "Financial Instruments" and Note 10 to the financial statements for additional information.
To mitigate residual risks relative to movements in fuel and electricity prices, the Company enters into financial hedge contracts for natural gas purchases and physical fixed-price contracts for the purchase and sale of electricity through the wholesale electricity market. The Company continues to manage a fuel-hedging program implemented per the guidelines of the Florida PSC and the actual cost of fuel is recovered through the retail fuel clause. The Florida PSC extended the moratorium on the Company's fuel-hedging program until January 1, 2021 in connection with the 2017 Rate Case Settlement Agreement. The moratorium does not have an impact on the recovery of existing hedges entered into under the previously-approved hedging program. The

MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS (continued)
Gulf Power Company 2017 Annual Report

Company had no material change in market risk exposure for the year ended December 31, 2017 when compared to the year ended December 31, 2016.
The changes in fair value of energy-related derivative contracts are substantially attributable to both the volume and the price of natural gas. For the years ended December 31, the changes in fair value of energy-related derivative contracts, substantially all of which are composed of regulatory hedges, were as follows:
 
2017
Changes
 
2016
Changes
 Fair Value
 (in millions)
Contracts outstanding at the beginning of the period, assets (liabilities), net$(24) $(100)
Contracts realized or settled17
 49
Current period changes(*)
(14) 27
Contracts outstanding at the end of the period, assets (liabilities), net$(21) $(24)
(*)Current period changes also include the changes in fair value of new contracts entered into during the period, if any.
The net hedge volumes of energy-related derivative contracts were 22 million mmBtu and 51 million mmBtu as of December 31, 2017 and December 31, 2016, respectively.
The weighted average swap contract cost above market prices was approximately $0.95 per mmBtu as of December 31, 2017 and $0.48 per mmBtu as of December 31, 2016. Natural gas settlements are recovered through the Company's fuel cost recovery clause.
At December 31, 2017 and 2016, substantially all of the Company's energy-related derivative contracts were designated as regulatory hedges and were related to the Company's fuel-hedging program. Therefore, gains and losses are initially recorded as regulatory liabilities and assets, respectively, and then are included in fuel expense as they are recovered through the fuel cost recovery clause. Gains and losses on energy-related derivative contracts that are not designated or fail to qualify as hedges are recognized in the statements of income as incurred and were not material for any year presented and the actual cost of fuel is recovered through the retail fuel clause.
The Company uses over-the-counter contracts that are not exchange traded but are fair valued using prices which are market observable, and thus fall into Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy. See Note 9 to the financial statements for further discussion of fair value measurements. The maturities of the energy-related derivative contracts, which are all Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy, at December 31, 2017 were as follows:
 
Fair Value Measurements
December 31, 2017
 Total Maturity
 Fair Value Year 1 Years 2&3 Years 4&5
 (in millions)
Level 1$
 $
 $
 $
Level 2(21) (14) (7) 
Level 3
 
 
 
Fair value of contracts outstanding at end of period$(21) $(14) $(7) $
The Company is exposed to market price risk in the event of nonperformance by counterparties to the energy-related derivative contracts. The Company only enters into agreements and material transactions with counterparties that have investment grade credit ratings by Moody's and S&P, or with counterparties who have posted collateral to cover potential credit exposure. Therefore, the Company does not anticipate market risk exposure from nonperformance by the counterparties. For additional information, see Note 1 to the financial statements under "Financial Instruments" and Note 10 to the financial statements.
Capital Requirements and Contractual Obligations
The construction program of the Company is currently estimated to total $304 million for 2018, $266 million for 2019, $358 million for 2020, $279 million for 2021, and $229 million for 2022. These amounts include capital expenditures related to contractual purchase commitments for capital expenditures covered under long-term service agreements. Estimated capital

MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS (continued)
Gulf Power Company 2017 Annual Report

expenditures to comply with environmental laws and regulations included in these amounts are $65 million, $57 million, $83 million, $58 million, and $16 million for 2018, 2019, 2020, 2021, and 2022, respectively. These estimated expenditures do not include any potential compliance costs associated with the regulation of CO2 emissions from fossil fuel-fired electric generating units. See FUTURE EARNINGS POTENTIAL – "Environmental Matters – Environmental Laws and Regulations" and "– Global Climate Issues" herein for additional information.
The Company also anticipates costs associated with closure and monitoring of ash ponds at Plant Scholz and in accordance with the CCR Rule, which are reflected in the Company's ARO liabilities. These costs, which could change as the Company continues to refine its assumptions underlying the cost estimates and evaluate the method and timing of compliance activities, are estimated to be $35 million, $11 million, $12 million, $18 million, and $4 million for the years 2018, 2019, 2020, 2021, and 2022, respectively. See Note 1 to the financial statements under "Asset Retirement Obligations and Other Costs of Removal" for additional information.
The construction program is subject to periodic review and revision, and actual construction costs may vary from these estimates because of numerous factors. These factors include: changes in business conditions; changes in load projections; storm impacts; changes in environmental laws and regulations; the outcome of any legal challenges to the environmental rules; changes in generating plants, including unit retirements and replacements and adding or changing fuel sources at existing generating units, to meet regulatory requirements; changes in the expected environmental compliance program; changes in FERC rules and regulations; Florida PSC approvals; changes in legislation; the cost and efficiency of construction labor, equipment, and materials; project scope and design changes; and the cost of capital. In addition, there can be no assurance that costs related to capital expenditures will be fully recovered.
In addition, as discussed in Note 2 to the financial statements, the Company provides postretirement benefits to substantially all employees and funds trusts to the extent required by the FERC and the Florida PSC.
Other funding requirements related to obligations associated with scheduled maturities of long-term debt, as well as the related interest, derivative obligations, leases, pension and post-retirement benefit plans, and other purchase commitments are detailed in the contractual obligations table that follows. See Notes 1, 2, 5, 6, 7, and 10 to the financial statements for additional information.

MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS (continued)
Gulf Power Company 2017 Annual Report

Contractual Obligations
Contractual obligations at December 31, 2017 were as follows:
 2018 
2019-
2020
 
2021-
2022
 
After
2022
 Total
 (in millions)
Long-term debt(a) –
         
Principal$
 $175
 $141
 $983
 $1,299
Interest48
 95
 79
 554
 776
Financial derivative obligations(b)
14
 7
 
 
 21
Operating leases(c)
8
 4
 3
 4
 19
Purchase commitments –         
Capital(d)
304
 594
 508
 
 1,406
Fuel(e)
211
 247
 132
 44
 634
Purchased power(f)
129
 266
 275
 906
 1,576
Other(g)
16
 34
 36
 119
 205
Pension and other postretirement benefit plans(h)
5
 11
 
 
 16
Total$735
 $1,433
 $1,174
 $2,610
 $5,952
(a)All amounts are reflected based on final maturity dates. The Company plans to continue, when economically feasible, to retire higher-cost securities and replace these obligations with lower-cost capital if market conditions permit. Variable rate interest obligations are estimated based on rates as of December 31, 2017, as reflected in the statements of capitalization. Fixed rates include, where applicable, the effects of interest rate derivatives employed to manage interest rate risk.
(b)See Notes 1 and 10 to the financial statements for additional information.
(c)Excludes a PPA accounted for as a lease, which is included in "Purchased power."
(d)The Company provides estimated capital expenditures for a five-year period, including capital expenditures associated with environmental regulations. These amounts exclude capital expenditures covered under long-term service agreements, which are reflected in "Other." At December 31, 2017, significant purchase commitments were outstanding in connection with the construction program. See FUTURE EARNINGS POTENTIAL – "Environmental Matters – Environmental Laws and Regulations" for additional information.
(e)Includes commitments to purchase coal and natural gas, as well as the related transportation and storage. In most cases, these contracts contain provisions for price escalation, minimum purchase levels, and other financial commitments. Natural gas purchase commitments are based on various indices at the time of delivery. Amounts reflected for natural gas purchase commitments have been estimated based on the New York Mercantile Exchange future prices at December 31, 2017.
(f)The capacity and transmission related costs associated with PPAs are recovered through the purchased power capacity cost recovery clause. Energy costs associated with PPAs are recovered through the fuel cost recovery clause. See Notes 3 and 7 to the financial statements for additional information.
(g)Includes long-term service agreements and contracts for the procurement of limestone. Long-term service agreements include price escalation based on inflation indices. Limestone costs are recovered through the environmental cost recovery clause. See Note 3 to the financial statements for additional information.
(h)The Company forecasts contributions to the pension and other postretirement benefit plans over a three-year period. The Company anticipates no mandatory contributions to the qualified pension plan during the next three years. Amounts presented represent estimated benefit payments for the nonqualified pension plans, estimated non-trust benefit payments for the other postretirement benefit plans, and estimated contributions to the other postretirement benefit plan trusts, all of which will be made from the Company's corporate assets. See Note 2 to the financial statements for additional information related to the pension and other postretirement benefit plans, including estimated benefit payments. Certain benefit payments will be made through the related benefit plans. Other benefit payments will be made from the Company's corporate assets.

MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS (continued)
Gulf Power Company 2017 Annual Report

Cautionary Statement Regarding Forward-Looking Statements
The Company's 2017 Annual Report contains forward-looking statements. Forward-looking statements include, among other things, statements concerning retail rates, customer and sales growth, economic conditions, fuel and environmental cost recovery and other rate actions, current and proposed environmental regulations and related compliance plans and estimated expenditures, pending or potential litigation matters, access to sources of capital, projections for the qualified pension plan and postretirement benefit plans contributions, financing activities, start and completion of construction projects, filings with state and federal regulatory authorities, impacts of the Tax Reform Legislation, federal income tax benefits, estimated sales and purchases under power sale and purchase agreements, and estimated construction and other plans and expenditures. In some cases, forward-looking statements can be identified by terminology such as "may," "will," "could," "should," "expects," "plans," "anticipates," "believes," "estimates," "projects," "predicts," "potential," or "continue" or the negative of these terms or other similar terminology. There are various factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from those suggested by the forward-looking statements; accordingly, there can be no assurance that such indicated results will be realized. These factors include:
the impact of recent and future federal and state regulatory changes, including environmental laws and regulations governing air, water, land, and protection of other natural resources, and also changes in tax and other laws and regulations to which the Company is subject, as well as changes in application of existing laws and regulations;
the uncertainty surrounding the recently enacted Tax Reform Legislation, including implementing regulations and IRS interpretations, actions that may be taken in response by regulatory authorities, and its impact, if any, on the credit ratings of the Company;
current and future litigation or regulatory investigations, proceedings, or inquiries;
the effects, extent, and timing of the entry of additional competition in the markets in which the Company operates;
variations in demand for electricity, including those relating to weather, the general economy, population and business growth (and declines), the effects of energy conservation and efficiency measures, including from the development and deployment of alternative energy sources such as self-generation and distributed generation technologies, and any potential economic impacts resulting from federal fiscal decisions;
available sources and costs of fuels;
effects of inflation;
the ability to control costs and avoid cost overruns during the development and construction of facilities, to construct facilities in accordance with the requirements of permits and licenses, and to satisfy any environmental performance standards;
investment performance of the Company's employee and retiree benefit plans;
advances in technology;
state and federal rate regulations and the impact of pending and future rate cases and negotiations, including rate actions relating to fuel and other cost recovery mechanisms;
the ability to successfully operate generating, transmission, and distribution facilities and the successful performance of necessary corporate functions;
internal restructuring or other restructuring options that may be pursued;
potential business strategies, including acquisitions or dispositions of assets or businesses, which cannot be assured to be completed or beneficial to the Company;
the ability of counterparties of the Company to make payments as and when due and to perform as required;
the ability to obtain new short- and long-term contracts with wholesale customers;
the direct or indirect effect on the Company's business resulting from cyber intrusion or physical attack and the threat of physical attacks;
interest rate fluctuations and financial market conditions and the results of financing efforts;
changes in the Company's credit ratings, including impacts on interest rates, access to capital markets, and collateral requirements;
the impacts of any sovereign financial issues, including impacts on interest rates, access to capital markets, impacts on foreign currency exchange rates, counterparty performance, and the economy in general;
the ability of the Company to obtain additional generating capacity (or sell excess generating capacity) at competitive prices;

MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS (continued)
Gulf Power Company 2017 Annual Report

catastrophic events such as fires, earthquakes, explosions, floods, tornadoes, hurricanes and other storms, droughts, pandemic health events such as influenzas, or other similar occurrences;
the direct or indirect effects on the Company's business resulting from incidents affecting the U.S. electric grid or operation of generating resources;
the effect of accounting pronouncements issued periodically by standard-setting bodies; and
other factors discussed elsewhere herein and in other reports filed by the Company from time to time with the SEC.
The Company expressly disclaims any obligation to update any forward-looking statements.
    Table of Contents                                Index to Financial Statements

STATEMENTS OF INCOME
For the Years Ended December 31, 20172018, 20162017, and 20152016
GulfGeorgia Power Company 20172018 Annual Report
2017
 2016
 2015
2018
 2017
 2016
(in millions)(in millions)
Operating Revenues:          
Retail revenues$1,281
 $1,281
 $1,249
$7,752
 $7,738
 $7,772
Wholesale revenues, non-affiliates57
 61
 107
163
 163
 175
Wholesale revenues, affiliates108
 75
 58
24
 26
 42
Other revenues70
 68
 69
481
 383
 394
Total operating revenues1,516
 1,485
 1,483
8,420
 8,310
 8,383
Operating Expenses:          
Fuel427
 432
 445
1,698
 1,671
 1,807
Purchased power155
 142
 135
Purchased power, non-affiliates430
 416
 361
Purchased power, affiliates723
 622
 518
Other operations and maintenance359
 336
 354
1,860
 1,724
 2,003
Depreciation and amortization137
 172
 141
923
 895
 855
Taxes other than income taxes116
 120
 118
437
 409
 405
Loss on Plant Scherer Unit 333
 
 
Estimated loss on Plant Vogtle Units 3 and 41,060
 
 
Total operating expenses1,227
 1,202
 1,193
7,131
 5,737
 5,949
Operating Income289
 283
 290
1,289
 2,573
 2,434
Other Income and (Expense):          
Interest expense, net of amounts capitalized(50) (47) (49)(397) (419) (388)
Other income (expense), net(10) (5) 8
115
 104
 81
Total other income and (expense)(60) (52) (41)(282) (315) (307)
Earnings Before Income Taxes229
 231
 249
1,007
 2,258
 2,127
Income taxes90
 91
 92
214
 830
 780
Net Income139
 140
 157
793
 1,428
 1,347
Dividends on Preference Stock4
 9
 9
Net Income After Dividends on Preference Stock$135
 $131
 $148
Dividends on Preferred and Preference Stock
 14
 17
Net Income After Dividends on Preferred and Preference Stock$793
 $1,414
 $1,330
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
    Table of Contents                                Index to Financial Statements

STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME
For the Years Ended December 31, 20172018, 20162017, and 20152016
GulfGeorgia Power Company 20172018 Annual Report
 
2017
 2016
 2015
2018
 2017
 2016
(in millions)(in millions)
Net Income$139
 $140
 $157
$793
 $1,428
 $1,347
Other comprehensive income (loss):          
Qualifying hedges:          
Changes in fair value, net of tax of $(1), $-, and $-, respectively(1) 1
 1
Reclassification adjustment for amounts included in net income,
net of tax of $1, $1, and $2, respectively
3
 3
 2
Total other comprehensive income (loss)(1) 1
 1
3
 3
 2
Comprehensive Income$138
 $141
 $158
$796
 $1,431
 $1,349
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
 
    Table of Contents                                Index to Financial Statements

STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
For the Years Ended December 31, 20172018, 20162017, and 20152016
GulfGeorgia Power Company 20172018 Annual Report
 2017
 2016
 2015
 (in millions)
Operating Activities:     
Net income$139
 $140
 $157
Adjustments to reconcile net income
to net cash provided from operating activities —
     
Depreciation and amortization, total149
 179
 152
Deferred income taxes72
 57
 90
Pension and postretirement funding
 (48) 
Loss on Plant Scherer Unit 333
 
 
Other, net(3) (3) 4
Changes in certain current assets and liabilities —     
-Receivables(43) 15
 33
-Fossil fuel stock8
 37
 (6)
-Prepaid income taxes8
 (11) 32
-Other current assets(2) (1) (2)
-Accounts payable20
 5
 (22)
-Over recovered regulatory clause revenues(12) 1
 22
-Other current liabilities(13) 8
 
Net cash provided from operating activities356
 379
 460
Investing Activities:     
Property additions(202) (178) (235)
Cost of removal, net of salvage(21) (9) (10)
Change in construction payables(2) 13
 (28)
Other investing activities(9) (6) (8)
Net cash used for investing activities(234) (180) (281)
Financing Activities:     
Increase (decrease) in notes payable, net(223) 126
 32
Proceeds —     
Common stock issued to parent175
 
 20
Capital contributions from parent company2
 20
 4
Pollution control revenue bonds
 
 13
Senior notes300
 
 
Redemptions and repurchases —     
Preference stock(150) 
 
Senior notes(85) (235) (60)
Pollution control revenue bonds
 
 (13)
Payment of common stock dividends(165) (120) (130)
Other financing activities(4) (8) (10)
Net cash used for financing activities(150) (217) (144)
Net Change in Cash and Cash Equivalents(28) (18) 35
Cash and Cash Equivalents at Beginning of Year56
 74
 39
Cash and Cash Equivalents at End of Year$28
 $56
 $74
Supplemental Cash Flow Information:     
Cash paid (received) during the period for —     
Interest (net of $-, $-, and $6 capitalized, respectively)$46
 $53
 $52
Income taxes (net of refunds)12
 21
 (7)
Noncash transactions —     
Accrued property additions at year-end31
 33
 20
Other financing activities related to energy services(7) 
 
Receivables related to energy services7
 
 
 2018
 2017
 2016
 (in millions)
Operating Activities:     
Net income$793
 $1,428
 $1,347
Adjustments to reconcile net income
to net cash provided from operating activities —
     
Depreciation and amortization, total1,142
 1,100
 1,063
Deferred income taxes(260) 458
 383
Pension, postretirement, and other employee benefits(75) (68) (33)
Pension and postretirement funding
 
 (287)
Settlement of asset retirement obligations(116) (120) (123)
Other deferred charges — affiliated
 
 (111)
Estimated loss on Plant Vogtle Units 3 and 41,060
 
 
Other, net(21) (83) (25)
Changes in certain current assets and liabilities —     
-Receivables8
 (256) 60
-Fossil fuel stock83
 (16) 104
-Prepaid income taxes152
 (168) 
-Other current assets(43) (28) (38)
-Accounts payable95
 (219) (42)
-Accrued taxes58
 1
 131
-Retail fuel cost over recovery
 (84) (32)
-Other current liabilities(107) (33) 28
Net cash provided from operating activities2,769
 1,912
 2,425
Investing Activities:     
Property additions(3,116) (2,704) (2,223)
Proceeds pursuant to the Toshiba Guarantee, net of joint owner portion            
 1,682
 
Nuclear decommissioning trust fund purchases(839) (574) (808)
Nuclear decommissioning trust fund sales833
 568
 803
Cost of removal, net of salvage(107) (100) (83)
Change in construction payables, net of joint owner portion68
 223
 (35)
Payments pursuant to LTSAs(54) (64) (34)
Proceeds from asset dispositions138
 96
 10
Other investing activities(32) (39) 23
Net cash used for investing activities(3,109) (912) (2,347)
Financing Activities:     
Increase (decrease) in notes payable, net294
 (391) 234
Proceeds —     
Capital contributions from parent company2,985
 431
 594
Senior notes
 1,350
 650
Short-term borrowings
 700
 
Other long-term debt
 370
 
FFB loan
 
 425
Pollution control revenue bonds issuances and remarketings108
 65
 
Redemptions and repurchases —     
Senior notes(1,500) (450) (700)
Pollution control revenue bonds(469) (65) (4)
Short-term borrowings(150) (550) 
Preferred and preference stock
 (270) 
Other long-term debt(100) 
 
Payment of common stock dividends(1,396) (1,281) (1,305)
Premiums on redemption and repurchases of senior notes(152) 
 
Other financing activities(20) (60) (36)
Net cash used for financing activities(400) (151) (142)
Net Change in Cash, Cash Equivalents, and Restricted Cash(740) 849
 (64)
Cash, Cash Equivalents, and Restricted Cash at Beginning of Year852
 3
 67
Cash, Cash Equivalents, and Restricted Cash at End of Year$112
 $852
 $3
Supplemental Cash Flow Information:     
Cash paid during the period for —     
Interest (net of $26, $23, and $20 capitalized, respectively)$408
 $386
 $375
Income taxes (net of refunds)300
 496
 170
Noncash transactions — Accrued property additions at year-end683
 550
 336
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

    Table of Contents                                Index to Financial Statements

BALANCE SHEETS
At December 31, 20172018 and 20162017
GulfGeorgia Power Company 20172018 Annual Report
 
Assets2017
 2016
2018
 2017
(in millions)(in millions)
Current Assets:      
Cash and cash equivalents$28
 $56
$4
 $852
Restricted cash108
 
Receivables —      
Customer accounts receivable76
 72
591
 544
Unbilled revenues67
 55
208
 255
Under recovered regulatory clause revenues27
 17
Under recovered fuel clause revenues115
 165
Joint owner accounts receivable170
 262
Affiliated14
 17
39
 24
Other accounts and notes receivable7
 6
80
 76
Accumulated provision for uncollectible accounts(1) (1)(2) (3)
Fossil fuel stock63
 71
231
 314
Materials and supplies57
 55
519
 504
Prepaid expenses142
 216
Other regulatory assets, current56
 44
199
 205
Other current assets21
 30
70
 14
Total current assets415
 422
2,474
 3,428
Property, Plant, and Equipment:      
In service5,196
 5,140
37,675
 34,861
Less: Accumulated provision for depreciation1,461
 1,382
12,096
 11,704
Plant in service, net of depreciation3,735
 3,758
25,579
 23,157
Nuclear fuel, at amortized cost550
 544
Construction work in progress91
 51
4,833
 4,613
Total property, plant, and equipment3,826
 3,809
30,962
 28,314
Other Property and Investments:   
Equity investments in unconsolidated subsidiaries51
 53
Nuclear decommissioning trusts, at fair value873
 929
Miscellaneous property and investments72
 59
Total other property and investments996
 1,041
Deferred Charges and Other Assets:      
Deferred charges related to income taxes31
 58
517
 516
Other regulatory assets, deferred502
 512
4,902
 2,932
Other deferred charges and assets23
 21
514
 548
Total deferred charges and other assets556
 591
5,933
 3,996
Total Assets$4,797
 $4,822
$40,365
 $36,779
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

    Table of Contents                                Index to Financial Statements


BALANCE SHEETS
At December 31, 20172018 and 20162017
GulfGeorgia Power Company 20172018 Annual Report
 
Liabilities and Stockholder's Equity2017
 2016
2018
 2017
(in millions)(in millions)
Current Liabilities:      
Securities due within one year$
 $87
$617
 $857
Notes payable45
 268
294
 150
Accounts payable —      
Affiliated52
 59
575
 493
Other75
 54
890
 834
Customer deposits35
 35
276
 270
Accrued taxes —   
Accrued income taxes1
 1
Other accrued taxes9
 19
Accrued taxes377
 344
Accrued interest9
 8
105
 123
Accrued compensation39
 40
221
 219
Deferred capacity expense, current22
 22
Asset retirement obligations, current202
 270
Other regulatory liabilities, current
 16
169
 191
Asset retirement obligations, current37
 16
Other current liabilities27
 24
183
 198
Total current liabilities351
 649
3,909
 3,949
Long-Term Debt (See accompanying statements)
1,285
 987
9,364
 11,073
Deferred Credits and Other Liabilities:      
Accumulated deferred income taxes537
 948
3,062
 3,175
Deferred credits related to income taxes458
 2
3,080
 3,248
Accumulated deferred ITCs262
 248
Employee benefit obligations102
 96
599
 659
Deferred capacity expense97
 119
Asset retirement obligations105
 120
Other cost of removal obligations221
 249
Other regulatory liabilities, deferred43
 45
Asset retirement obligations, deferred5,627
 2,368
Other deferred credits and liabilities67
 71
139
 128
Total deferred credits and other liabilities1,630
 1,650
12,769
 9,826
Total Liabilities3,266
 3,286
26,042
 24,848
Preference Stock (See accompanying statements)

 147
Common Stockholder's Equity (See accompanying statements)
1,531
 1,389
14,323
 11,931
Total Liabilities and Stockholder's Equity$4,797
 $4,822
$40,365
 $36,779
Commitments and Contingent Matters (See notes)

 

 
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
 
    Table of Contents                                Index to Financial Statements

STATEMENTS OF CAPITALIZATION
At December 31, 20172018 and 20162017
GulfGeorgia Power Company 20172018 Annual Report
 
 2017
 2016
 2017
 2016
 (in millions) (percent of total)
Long-Term Debt:       
Long-term notes payable —       
2.93% to 5.90% due 2017$
 $87
    
4.75% due 2020175
 175
    
3.10% due 2022100
 100
    
3.30% to 5.10% due 2027-2044715
 415
    
Total long-term notes payable990
 777
    
Other long-term debt —       
Pollution control revenue bonds —       
2.10% due 202237
 37
    
1.15% to 4.45% due 2023-2049190
 190
    
Variable rate (1.83% at 12/31/17) due 20224
 4
    
Variable rates (1.85% to 1.88% at 12/31/17) due 2039-204278
 78
    
Total other long-term debt309
 309
    
Unamortized debt discount(5) (5)    
Unamortized debt issuance expense(9) (7)    
Total long-term debt (annual interest requirement — $48 million)1,285
 1,074
    
Less amount due within one year
 87
    
Long-term debt excluding amount due within one year1,285
 987
 45.6% 39.1%
Preferred and Preference Stock:       
Authorized — 20,000,000 shares — preferred stock       
— 10,000,000 shares — preference stock       
Outstanding — $100 par or stated value       
— 2017: no shares       
— 2016:       
— 6.00% preference stock — 550,000 shares (non-cumulative)
 54
    
— 6.45% preference stock — 450,000 shares (non-cumulative)
 44
    
— 5.60% preference stock — 500,000 shares (non-cumulative)
 49
    
Total preference stock
 147
 
 5.8
Common Stockholder's Equity:       
Common stock, without par value —       
Authorized — 20,000,000 shares       
Outstanding — 2017: 7,392,717 shares       
  — 2016: 5,642,717 shares678
 503
    
Paid-in capital594
 589
    
Retained earnings259
 296
    
Accumulated other comprehensive income
 1
    
Total common stockholder's equity1,531
 1,389
 54.4
 55.1
Total Capitalization$2,816
 $2,523
 100.0% 100.0%
 2018
 2017
 2018
 2017
 (in millions) (percent of total)
Long-Term Debt:       
Long-term notes payable —       
1.95% to 5.40% due 2018$
 $747
    
4.25% due 2019498
 499
    
2.00% due 2020950
 950
    
2.40% due 2021325
 325
    
2.85% due 2022400
 400
    
5.75% due 2023100
 100
    
3.25% to 5.95% due 2026-20433,325
 4,075
    
Variable rate (2.29% at 12/31/17) due 2018
 100
    
Total long-term notes payable5,598
 7,196
    
Other long-term debt —       
Pollution control revenue bonds —       
2.35% due 202253
 53
    
1.55% to 4.00% due 2025-2049748
 940
    
Variable rate (1.77% to 1.78% at 12/31/18) due 2019108
 108
    
Variable rates (1.70% to 1.83% at 12/31/18) due 2026-2052551
 720
    
FFB loans —       
2.57% to 3.86% due 202044
 44
    
2.57% to 3.86% due 202144
 44
    
2.57% to 3.86% due 202244
 44
    
2.57% to 3.86% due 202344
 44
    
2.57% to 3.86% due 2024-20442,449
 2,449
    
Junior subordinated note (5.00%) due 2077270
 270
    
Total other long-term debt4,355
 4,716
    
Capitalized lease obligations142
 154
    
Unamortized debt premium (discount), net(6) (12)    
Unamortized debt issuance expense(108) (124)    
Total long-term debt (annual interest requirement — $356 million)9,981
 11,930
    
Less amount due within one year617
 857
    
Long-term debt excluding amount due within one year9,364
 11,073
 39.5% 48.1%
Common Stockholder's Equity:       
Common stock, without par value —       
Authorized — 20,000,000 shares       
Outstanding — 9,261,500 shares398
 398
    
Paid-in capital10,322
 7,328
    
Retained earnings3,612
 4,215
    
Accumulated other comprehensive loss(9) (10)    
Total common stockholder's equity14,323
 11,931
 60.5
 51.9
Total Capitalization$23,687
 $23,004
 100.0% 100.0%
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
 
    Table of Contents                                Index to Financial Statements

STATEMENTS OF COMMON STOCKHOLDER'S EQUITY
For the Years Ended December 31, 2018, 2017,, 2016, and 20152016
GulfGeorgia Power Company 20172018 Annual Report
 
Number of Common Shares Issued Common Stock Paid-In Capital Retained Earnings Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss) TotalNumber of Common Shares Issued Common Stock Paid-In Capital Retained Earnings Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss) Total
(in millions)(in millions)
Balance at December 31, 20145
 $483
 $560
 $267
 $(1) $1,309
Net income after dividends on
preference stock

 
 
 148
 
 148
Issuance of common stock1
 20
 
 
 
 20
Capital contributions from parent company
 
 7
 
 
 7
Other comprehensive income (loss)
 
 
 
 1
 1
Cash dividends on common stock
 
 
 (130) 
 (130)
Balance at December 31, 20156
 503
 567
 285
 
 1,355
9
 $398
 $6,275
 $4,061
 $(15) $10,719
Net income after dividends on
preference stock

 
 
 131
 
 131
Net income after dividends on
preferred and preference stock

 
 
 1,330
 
 1,330
Capital contributions from parent company
 
 22
 
 
 22

 
 610
 
 
 610
Other comprehensive income (loss)
 
 
 
 1
 1

 
 
 
 2
 2
Cash dividends on common stock
 
 
 (120) 
 (120)
 
 
 (1,305) 
 (1,305)
Balance at December 31, 20166
 503
 589
 296
 1
 1,389
9
 398
 6,885
 4,086
 (13) 11,356
Net income after dividends on
preference stock

 
 
 135
 
 135
Issuance of common stock
 175
 
 
 
 175
Net income after dividends on
preferred and preference stock

 
 
 1,414
 
 1,414
Capital contributions from parent company
 
 5
 
 
 5

 
 443
 
 
 443
Other comprehensive income (loss)
 
 
 
 (1) (1)
 
 
 
 3
 3
Cash dividends on common stock
 
 
 (165) 
 (165)
 
 
 (1,281) 
 (1,281)
Other
 
 
 (7) 
 (7)
 
 
 (4) 
 (4)
Balance at December 31, 20176
 $678
 $594
 $259
 $
 $1,531
9
 398
 7,328
 4,215
 (10) 11,931
Net income after dividends on
preferred and preference stock

 
 
 793
 
 793
Capital contributions from parent company
 
 2,994
 
 
 2,994
Other comprehensive income (loss)
 
 
 
 3
 3
Cash dividends on common stock
 
 
 (1,396) 
 (1,396)
Other
 
 
 
 (2) (2)
Balance at December 31, 20189
 $398
 $10,322
 $3,612
 $(9) $14,323
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.


NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Gulf Power Company 2017 Annual Report




Index to the Notes to Financial Statements



NOTES (continued)
Gulf Power Company 2017 Annual Report

1. SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES
General
Gulf Power Company (the Company) is a wholly-owned subsidiary of Southern Company, which is the parent company of the Company and three other traditional electric operating companies, as well as Southern Power, Southern Company Gas (as of July 1, 2016), SCS, Southern Linc, Southern Company Holdings, Inc. (Southern Holdings), Southern Nuclear, PowerSecure (as of May 9, 2016), Inc. (PowerSecure), and other direct and indirect subsidiaries. The traditional electric operating companies – the Company, Alabama Power, Georgia Power, and Mississippi Power – are vertically integrated utilities providing electric service in four Southeastern states. The Company provides electric service to retail customers in northwest Florida and to wholesale customers in the Southeast. Southern Power develops, constructs, acquires, owns, and manages power generation assets, including renewable energy projects, and sells electricity at market-based rates in the wholesale market. Southern Company Gas distributes natural gas through utilities in seven states and is involved in several other complementary businesses including gas marketing services, wholesale gas services, and gas midstream operations. SCS, the system service company, provides, at cost, specialized services to Southern Company and its subsidiary companies. Southern Linc provides digital wireless communications for use by Southern Company and its subsidiary companies and also markets these services to the public and provides fiber optics services within the Southeast. Southern Holdings is an intermediate holding company subsidiary, primarily for Southern Company's investments in leveraged leases and for other electric services. Southern Nuclear operates and provides services to the Southern Company system's nuclear power plants. PowerSecure is a provider of products and services in the areas of distributed generation, energy efficiency, and utility infrastructure.
The equity method is used for entities in which the Company has significant influence but does not control.
The Company is subject to regulation by the FERC and the Florida PSC. As such, the Company's financial statements reflect the effects of rate regulation in accordance with GAAP and comply with the accounting policies and practices prescribed by its regulatory commissions. The preparation of financial statements in conformity with GAAP requires the use of estimates, and the actual results may differ from those estimates. Certain prior years' data presented in the financial statements have been reclassified to conform to the current year presentation.
Recently Issued Accounting Standards
Revenue
In 2014, the FASB issued ASC 606, Revenue from Contracts with Customers (ASC 606), replacing the existing accounting standard and industry specific guidance for revenue recognition with a five-step model for recognizing and measuring revenue from contracts with customers. The underlying principle of the new standard is to recognize revenue to depict the transfer of goods or services to customers at the amount expected to be collected. The new standard also requires enhanced disclosures regarding the nature, amount, timing, and uncertainty of revenue and the related cash flows arising from contracts with customers.
Most of the Company's revenue, including energy provided to customers, is from tariff offerings that provide electricity without a defined contractual term, as well as longer-term contractual commitments, including PPAs.
The Company has completed the evaluation of all revenue streams and determined that the adoption of ASC 606 will not change the current timing of revenue recognition for such transactions. Some revenue arrangements, such as energy-related derivatives, are excluded from the scope of ASC 606 and, therefore, will be accounted for and disclosed separately from revenues under ASC 606. The Company has concluded contributions in aid of construction are not in scope for ASC 606 and will continue to be accounted for as an offset to property, plant, and equipment.
The new standard is effective for reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2017. The Company applied the modified retrospective method of adoption effective January 1, 2018. The Company also utilized practical expedients which allowed it to apply the standard to open contracts at the date of adoption and to reflect the aggregate effect of all modifications when identifying performance obligations and allocating the transaction price for contracts modified before the effective date. Under the modified retrospective method of adoption, prior year reported results are not restated; however, a cumulative-effect adjustment to retained earnings at January 1, 2018 is recorded. In addition, quarterly disclosures will include comparative information on 2018 financial statement line items under current guidance. The adoption of ASC 606 did not result in a cumulative-effect adjustment.
Leases
In February 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-02, Leases (Topic 842) (ASU 2016-02). ASU 2016-02 requires lessees to recognize on the balance sheet a lease liability and a right-of-use asset for all leases. ASU 2016-02 also changes the recognition,

NOTES (continued)
Gulf Power Company 2017 Annual Report

measurement, and presentation of expense associated with leases and provides clarification regarding the identification of certain components of contracts that would represent a lease. The accounting required by lessors is relatively unchanged. ASU 2016-02 is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2018 and the Company will adopt the new standard effective January 1, 2019.
The Company is currently implementing an information technology system along with the related changes to internal controls and accounting policies that will support the accounting for leases under ASU 2016-02. In addition, the Company has substantially completed a detailed inventory and analysis of its leases. In terms of rental charges and duration of contracts, the most significant leases relate to a PPA, cellular towers, and barges where the Company is the lessee and to outdoor lighting and power distribution equipment where the Company is the lessor. The Company is currently analyzing pole attachment agreements and a lease determination has not been made at this time. While the Company has not yet determined the ultimate impact, adoption of ASU 2016-02 is expected to have a significant impact on the Company's balance sheet.
Other
In March 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-09, Compensation-Stock Compensation (Topic 718): Improvements to Employee Share-Based Payment Accounting (ASU 2016-09). ASU 2016-09 changes the accounting for income taxes and the cash flow presentation for share-based payment award transactions effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2016. The new guidance requires all excess tax benefits and deficiencies related to the exercise or vesting of stock compensation to be recognized as income tax expense or benefit in the income statement. Previously, the Company recognized any excess tax benefits and deficiencies related to the exercise and vesting of stock compensation as additional paid-in capital. In addition, the new guidance requires excess tax benefits for share-based payments to be included in net cash provided from operating activities rather than net cash provided from financing activities on the statement of cash flows. The Company elected to adopt the guidance in 2016 and reflect the related adjustments as of January 1, 2016. Prior year's data presented in the financial statements has not been adjusted. The Company also elected to recognize forfeitures as they occur. The new guidance did not have a material impact on the results of operations, financial position, or cash flows of the Company. See Notes 5 and 8 for disclosures impacted by ASU 2016-09.
On March 10, 2017, the FASB issued ASU No. 2017-07, Compensation – Retirement Benefits (Topic 715): Improving the Presentation of Net Periodic Pension Cost and Net Periodic Postretirement Benefit Cost (ASU 2017-07). ASU 2017-07 requires that an employer report the service cost component in the same line item or items as other compensation costs and requires the other components of net periodic pension and postretirement benefit costs to be separately presented in the income statement outside of income from operations. Additionally, only the service cost component is eligible for capitalization, when applicable. However, all cost components remain eligible for capitalization under FERC regulations. ASU 2017-07 will be applied retrospectively for the presentation of the service cost component and the other components of net periodic pension and postretirement benefit costs in the income statement. The capitalization of only the service cost component of net periodic pension and postretirement benefit costs in assets will be applied on a prospective basis. ASU 2017-07 is effective for periods beginning after December 15, 2017. The presentation changes required for net periodic pension and postretirement benefit costs will result in a decrease in the Company's operating income and an increase in other income for 2016 and 2017 and are expected to result in a decrease in operating income and an increase in other income for 2018. The Company adopted ASU 2017-07 effective January 1, 2018 with no material impact on its financial statements.
On August 28, 2017, the FASB issued ASU No. 2017-12, Derivatives and Hedging (Topic 815): Targeted Improvements to Accounting for Hedging Activities (ASU 2017-12), amending the hedge accounting recognition and presentation requirements. ASU 2017-12 makes more financial and non-financial hedging strategies eligible for hedge accounting, amends the related presentation and disclosure requirements, and simplifies hedge effectiveness assessment requirements. ASU 2017-12 is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2018, with early adoption permitted. The Company adopted ASU 2017-12 effective January 1, 2018 with no material impact on its financial statements.
Affiliate Transactions
The Company has an agreement with SCS under which the following services are rendered to the Company at direct or allocated cost: general and design engineering, operations, purchasing, accounting, finance and treasury, tax, information technology, marketing, auditing, insurance and pension administration, human resources, systems and procedures, digital wireless communications, and other services with respect to business and operations, construction management, and power pool transactions. Costs for these services amounted to $81 million, $80 million, and $81 million during 2017, 2016, and 2015, respectively. Cost allocation methodologies used by SCS prior to the repeal of the Public Utility Holding Company Act of 1935, as amended, were approved by the SEC. Subsequently, additional cost allocation methodologies have been reported to the FERC and management believes they are reasonable. The FERC permits services to be rendered at cost by system service companies.

NOTES (continued)
Gulf Power Company 2017 Annual Report

See Note 7 under "Operating Leases" for information on leases of cellular tower space for the Company's digital wireless communications equipment.
The Company has operating agreements with Georgia Power and Mississippi Power under which the Company owns a portion of Plant Scherer and Plant Daniel, respectively. Georgia Power operates Plant Scherer and Mississippi Power operates Plant Daniel. The Company reimbursed Georgia Power $11 million, $8 million, and $12 million and Mississippi Power $31 million, $26 million, and $27 million in 2017, 2016, and 2015, respectively, for its proportionate share of related expenses. See Note 4 and Note 7 under "Operating Leases" for additional information.
Total power purchased from affiliates through the power pool, included in purchased power in the statements of income, totaled $15 million, $16 million, and $35 million in 2017, 2016, and 2015, respectively.
The Company has an agreement with Alabama Power under which Alabama Power made transmission system upgrades to ensure firm delivery of energy under a non-affiliate PPA from a combined cycle plant located in Alabama. Payments by the Company to Alabama Power for the improvements were $11 million, $12 million, and $14 million in 2017, 2016, and 2015, respectively, and are expected to be approximately $10 million annually for 2018 through 2023, when the PPA expires. These costs have been approved for recovery by the Florida PSC through the Company's purchased power capacity cost recovery clause and by the FERC in the transmission facilities cost allocation tariff.
In 2016, the Company purchased a turbine rotor assembly from Southern Power for $6.8 million.
The Company provides incidental services to and receives such services from other Southern Company subsidiaries which are generally minor in duration and amount. Except as described herein, the Company neither provided nor received any material services to or from affiliates in 2017, 2016, or 2015.
The traditional electric operating companies, including the Company and Southern Power, may jointly enter into various types of wholesale energy, natural gas, and certain other contracts, either directly or through SCS, as agent. Each participating company may be jointly and severally liable for the obligations incurred under these agreements. See Note 7 under "Fuel and Purchased Power Agreements" for additional information.

NOTES (continued)
Gulf Power Company 2017 Annual Report

Regulatory Assets and Liabilities
The Company is subject to accounting requirements for the effects of rate regulation. Regulatory assets represent probable future revenues associated with certain costs that are expected to be recovered from customers through the ratemaking process. Regulatory liabilities represent probable future reductions in revenues associated with amounts that are expected to be credited to customers through the ratemaking process.
Regulatory assets and (liabilities) reflected in the balance sheets at December 31 relate to:
 2017
 2016
 Note
 (in millions)  
Retiree benefit plans, net$166
 $160
 (a,b)
PPA charges119
 141
 (b,c)
Closure of ash ponds80
 75
 (b,d)
Remaining book value of retired assets65
 66
 (e)
Environmental remediation52
 44
 (b,d)
Other regulatory assets, net36
 18
 (i)
Deferred income tax charges31
 56
 (f)
Deferred return on transmission upgrades25
 25
 (e)
Fuel-hedging assets, net21
 24
 (b,h)
Loss on reacquired debt17
 18
 (j)
Asset retirement obligations, net13
 7
 (b,f)
Regulatory asset, offset to other cost of removal
 29
 (e)
Deferred income tax credits(458) (2) (g)
Other cost of removal obligations(221) (278) (f)
Property damage reserve(40) (40) (e)
Over recovered regulatory clause revenues(11) (23) (k)
Total regulatory assets (liabilities), net$(105) $320
  
Note: The recovery and amortization periods for these regulatory assets and (liabilities) are as follows:
(a)Recovered and amortized over the average remaining service period, which may range up to 14 years. See Note 2 for additional information.
(b)Not earning a return as offset in rate base by a corresponding asset or liability.
(c)Recovered over the life of the PPA for periods up to six years.
(d)Recovered through the environmental cost recovery clause when the remediation or the work is performed.
(e)Recorded and recovered or amortized as approved by the Florida PSC.
(f)Asset retirement and removal assets and liabilities are recorded, and deferred income tax assets are recorded, recovered, and amortized, over the related property lives, which may range up to 65 years. Asset retirement and removal assets and liabilities will be settled and trued up following completion of the related activities.
(g)Deferred income tax liabilities are amortized over the related property lives, which may range up to 65 years. Includes the deferred tax liabilities as a result of the Tax Reform Legislation. Amortization of $71 million of the deferred tax liabilities at December 31, 2017 is expected to be determined by the Florida PSC at a later date. See Notes 3 and 5 for additional information.
(h)Fuel-hedging assets and liabilities are recorded over the life of the underlying hedged purchase contracts, which currently do not exceed four years. Upon final settlement, actual costs incurred are recovered through the fuel cost recovery clause.
(i)Comprised primarily of under recovered regulatory clause revenues. Other regulatory assets costs, with the exception of vacation pay, are recorded and recovered or amortized as approved by the Florida PSC. Vacation pay, including banked holiday pay, does not earn a return as offset in rate base by a corresponding liability; it is recorded as earned by employees and recovered as paid, generally within one year.
(j)Recovered over either the remaining life of the original issue or, if refinanced, over the life of the new issue, which may range up to 40 years.
(k)Recorded and recovered or amortized as approved by the Florida PSC, generally within one year.
In the event that a portion of the Company's operations is no longer subject to applicable accounting rules for rate regulation, the Company would be required to write off to income or reclassify to accumulated OCI related regulatory assets and liabilities that are not specifically recoverable through regulated rates. In addition, the Company would be required to determine if any impairment to other assets, including plant, exists and write down the assets, if impaired, to their fair values. All regulatory assets and liabilities are to be reflected in rates. See Note 3 under "Retail Regulatory Matters" for additional information.

NOTES (continued)
Gulf Power Company 2017 Annual Report

Revenues
Wholesale capacity revenues are generally recognized on a levelized basis over the appropriate contract period. Energy and other revenues are recognized as services are provided. Unbilled revenues related to retail sales are accrued at the end of each fiscal period. Electric rates for the Company include provisions to adjust billings for fluctuations in fuel costs, the energy component of purchased power costs, and certain other costs. The Company continuously monitors the over or under recovered fuel cost balance in light of the inherent variability in fuel costs. The Company is required to notify the Florida PSC if the projected fuel cost over or under recovery is expected to exceed 10% of the projected fuel revenue applicable for the period and indicate if an adjustment to the fuel cost recovery factor is being requested. The Company has similar retail cost recovery clauses for energy conservation costs, purchased power capacity costs, and environmental compliance costs. Revenues are adjusted for differences between these actual costs and amounts billed in current regulated rates. Under or over recovered regulatory clause revenues are recorded in the balance sheets and are recovered or returned to customers through adjustments to the billing factors. Annually, the Company petitions for recovery of projected costs including any true-up amounts from prior periods, and approved rates are implemented each January. See Note 3 under "Retail Regulatory Matters" for additional information.
The Company has a diversified base of customers. No single customer or industry comprises 10% or more of revenues. For all periods presented, uncollectible accounts averaged less than 1% of revenues.
Fuel Costs
Fuel costs are expensed as the fuel is used. Fuel expense generally includes fuel transportation costs and the cost of purchased emissions allowances as they are used. Fuel expense and emissions allowance costs are recovered by the Company through the fuel cost recovery and environmental cost recovery rates, respectively, approved annually by the Florida PSC.
Income and Other Taxes
The Company uses the liability method of accounting for deferred income taxes and provides deferred income taxes for all significant income tax temporary differences. Federal ITCs utilized are deferred and amortized to income over the average life of the related property and state ITCs are recognized in the period in which the credit is claimed on the state income tax return. Taxes that are collected from customers on behalf of governmental agencies to be remitted to these agencies are presented net on the statements of income.
The Company recognizes tax positions that are "more likely than not" of being sustained upon examination by the appropriate taxing authorities. See Note 5 under "Unrecognized Tax Benefits" for additional information.
Property, Plant, and Equipment
Property, plant, and equipment is stated at original cost less any regulatory disallowances and impairments. Original cost includes: materials; labor; minor items of property; appropriate administrative and general costs; payroll-related costs such as taxes, pensions, and other benefits; and the interest capitalized and cost of equity funds used during construction.
The Company's property, plant, and equipment in service consisted of the following at December 31:
 2017 2016
 (in millions)
Generation$3,005
 $3,001
Transmission720
 706
Distribution1,282
 1,241
General188
 191
Plant acquisition adjustment1
 1
Total plant in service$5,196
 $5,140
The cost of replacements of property, exclusive of minor items of property, is capitalized. The cost of maintenance, repairs, and replacement of minor items of property is charged to other operations and maintenance expenses as incurred or performed.
Depreciation and Amortization
Depreciation of the original cost of utility plant in service is provided primarily by using composite straight-line rates, which approximated 3.5% for all years presented. Depreciation studies are conducted periodically to update the composite rates. These studies are approved by the Florida PSC and the FERC. When property subject to depreciation is retired or otherwise disposed of

NOTES (continued)
Gulf Power Company 2017 Annual Report

in the normal course of business, its original cost, together with the cost of removal, less salvage, is charged to accumulated depreciation. For other property dispositions, the applicable cost and accumulated depreciation are removed from the balance sheet accounts, and a gain or loss is recognized. Minor items of property included in the original cost of the plant are retired when the related property unit is retired. As authorized in a settlement agreement approved by the Florida PSC in 2013 (2013 Rate Case Settlement Agreement), the Company was allowed to reduce depreciation and record a regulatory asset in an aggregate amount up to $62.5 million between January 2014 and June 2017. See Note 3 under "Retail Regulatory Matters – Retail Base Rate Cases" for additional information.
Asset Retirement Obligations and Other Costs of Removal
AROs are computed as the present value of the estimated ultimate costs for an asset's future retirement and are recorded in the period in which the liability is incurred. The costs are capitalized as part of the related long-lived asset and depreciated over the asset's useful life. In the absence of quoted market prices, AROs are estimated using present value techniques in which estimates of future cash outlays associated with the asset retirements are discounted using a credit-adjusted risk-free rate. Estimates of the timing and amounts of future cash outlays are based on projections of when and how the assets will be retired and the cost of future removal activities. The Company has received an order from the Florida PSC allowing the continued accrual of other future retirement costs for long-lived assets that the Company does not have a legal obligation to retire. Accordingly, the accumulated removal costs for these obligations are reflected in the balance sheets as a regulatory liability.
The liability for AROs primarily relates to facilities that are subject to the Disposal of Coal Combustion Residuals from Electric Utilities final rule published by the EPA in 2015 (CCR Rule), principally ash ponds, and to the closure of an ash pond at Plant Scholz. In addition, the Company has retirement obligations related to combustion turbines at its Pea Ridge facility, various landfill sites, a barge unloading dock, asbestos removal, and disposal of polychlorinated biphenyls in certain transformers. The Company also has identified retirement obligations related to certain transmission and distribution facilities, certain wireless communication towers, and certain structures authorized by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers. However, liabilities for the removal of these assets have not been recorded because the settlement timing for the retirement obligations related to these assets is indeterminable and, therefore, the fair value of the retirement obligations cannot be reasonably estimated. A liability for these AROs will be recognized when sufficient information becomes available to support a reasonable estimation of the ARO. The Company will continue to recognize in the statements of income allowed removal costs in accordance with its regulatory treatment. Any differences between costs recognized in accordance with accounting standards related to asset retirement and environmental obligations and those reflected in rates are recognized as either a regulatory asset or liability, as ordered by the Florida PSC, and are reflected in the balance sheets.
Details of the AROs included on the balance sheets are as follows:
 2017 2016
 (in millions)
Balance at beginning of year$136
 $130
Liabilities incurred
 1
Liabilities settled(8) (1)
Accretion2
 4
Cash flow revisions12
 2
Balance at end of year$142
 $136
The cost estimates for AROs related to CCR are based on information as of December 31, 2017 using various assumptions related to closure and post-closure costs, timing of future cash outlays, inflation and discount rates, and the potential methods for complying with the CCR Rule requirements for closure for those facilities impacted by the CCR Rule. As further analysis is performed and closure details are developed, the Company will continue to periodically update these cost estimates as necessary.
Allowance for Funds Used During Construction
The Company records AFUDC, which represents the estimated debt and equity costs of capital funds that are necessary to finance the construction of new regulated facilities. While cash is not realized currently, AFUDC increases the revenue requirement and is recovered over the service life of the plant through a higher rate base and higher depreciation. The equity component of AFUDC is not included in calculating taxable income. The average annual AFUDC rate was 5.73% for all years presented. AFUDC, net of income taxes, as a percentage of net income after dividends on preference stock was 0.07%, 0.00%, and 10.8% for 2017, 2016, and 2015, respectively.

NOTES (continued)
Gulf Power Company 2017 Annual Report

Impairment of Long-Lived Assets and Intangibles
The Company evaluates long-lived assets for impairment when events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying value of such assets may not be recoverable. The determination of whether an impairment has occurred is based on either a specific regulatory disallowance or an estimate of undiscounted future cash flows attributable to the assets, as compared with the carrying value of the assets. If an impairment has occurred, the amount of the impairment recognized is determined by either the amount of regulatory disallowance or by estimating the fair value of the assets and recording a loss if the carrying value is greater than the fair value. For assets identified as held for sale, the carrying value is compared to the estimated fair value less the cost to sell in order to determine if an impairment loss is required. Until the assets are disposed of, their estimated fair value is re-evaluated when circumstances or events change.
Property Damage Reserve
The Company accrues for the cost of repairing damages from major storms and other uninsured property damages, including uninsured damages to transmission and distribution facilities, generation facilities, and other property. The costs of such damage are charged to the reserve. The Florida PSC approved annual accrual to the property damage reserve is $3.5 million, with a target level for the reserve between $48 million and $55 million. In accordance with a settlement agreement approved by the Florida PSC on April 4, 2017 (2017 Rate Case Settlement Agreement), the Company suspended further property damage reserve accruals effective April 2017. The Company may make discretionary accruals and is required to resume accruals of $3.5 million annually if the reserve falls below zero. The Company accrued total expenses of $3.5 million in each of 2017, 2016, and 2015. As of December 31, 2017 and 2016, the balance in the Company's property damage reserve totaled approximately $40 million, which is included in other regulatory liabilities, deferred on the balance sheets.
When the property damage reserve is inadequate to cover the cost of major storms, the Florida PSC can authorize a storm cost recovery surcharge to be applied to customer bills. As authorized in the 2017 Rate Case Settlement Agreement, the Company may initiate a storm surcharge to recover costs associated with any tropical systems named by the National Hurricane Center or other catastrophic storm events that reduce the property damage reserve in the aggregate by approximately $31 million (75% of the April 1, 2017 balance) or more. The storm surcharge would begin, on an interim basis, 60 days following the filing of a cost recovery petition, would be limited to $4.00/month for a 1,000 KWH residential customer unless the Company incurs in excess of $100 million in qualified storm recovery costs in a calendar year, and would replenish the property damage reserve to approximately $40 million. See Note 3 under "Retail Regulatory Matters – Retail Base Rate Cases" for additional details of the 2017 Rate Case Settlement Agreement.
Injuries and Damages Reserve
The Company is subject to claims and lawsuits arising in the ordinary course of business. As permitted by the Florida PSC, the Company accrues for the uninsured costs of injuries and damages by charges to income amounting to $1.6 million annually. The Florida PSC has also given the Company the flexibility to increase its annual accrual above $1.6 million to the extent the balance in the reserve does not exceed $2 million and to defer expense recognition of liabilities greater than the balance in the reserve. The cost of settling claims is charged to the reserve. The injuries and damages reserve had a balance of $2.1 million and $1.4 million at December 31, 2017, and 2016, respectively. For 2017, $1.6 million and $0.5 million are included in other current liabilities and other deferred credits and liabilities on the balance sheet, respectively. For 2016, the $1.4 million balance is included in other current liabilities on the balance sheet. There were no liabilities in excess of the reserve balance at December 31, 2017 or 2016.
Cash and Cash Equivalents
For purposes of the financial statements, temporary cash investments are considered cash equivalents. Temporary cash investments are securities with original maturities of 90 days or less.
Materials and Supplies
Generally, materials and supplies include the average cost of transmission, distribution, and generating plant materials. Materials are charged to inventory when purchased and then expensed or capitalized to plant, as appropriate, at weighted average cost when installed.
Fuel Inventory
Fuel inventory includes the average cost of oil, natural gas, coal, transportation, and emissions allowances. Fuel is recorded to inventory when purchased and then expensed, at weighted average cost, as used. Fuel expense and emissions allowance costs are

NOTES (continued)
Gulf Power Company 2017 Annual Report

recovered by the Company through the fuel cost recovery and environmental cost recovery rates, respectively, approved annually by the Florida PSC. Emissions allowances granted by the EPA are included in inventory at zero cost.
Financial Instruments
The Company uses derivative financial instruments to limit exposure to fluctuations in interest rates, the prices of certain fuel purchases, and electricity purchases and sales. All derivative financial instruments are recognized as either assets or liabilities on the balance sheets (included in "Other" or shown separately as "Risk Management Activities") and are measured at fair value. See Note 9 for additional information regarding fair value. Substantially all of the Company's bulk energy purchases and sales contracts that meet the definition of a derivative are excluded from fair value accounting requirements because they qualify for the "normal" scope exception, and are accounted for under the accrual method. Derivative contracts that qualify as cash flow hedges of anticipated transactions or are recoverable through the Florida PSC approved fuel-hedging program result in the deferral of related gains and losses in OCI or regulatory assets and liabilities, respectively, until the hedged transactions occur. Any ineffectiveness arising from cash flow hedges is recognized currently in net income. Other derivative contracts that qualify as fair value hedges are marked to market through current period income and are recorded on a net basis in the statements of income. Cash flows from derivatives are classified on the statement of cash flows in the same category as the hedged item. The Florida PSC extended the moratorium on the Company's fuel-hedging program until January 1, 2021 in connection with the 2017 Rate Case Settlement Agreement. The moratorium does not have an impact on the recovery of existing hedges entered into under the previously-approved hedging program. See Note 10 for additional information regarding derivatives.
The Company offsets fair value amounts recognized for multiple derivative instruments executed with the same counterparty under a netting arrangement. Additionally, the Company had no outstanding collateral repayment obligations or rights to reclaim collateral arising from derivative instruments recognized at December 31, 2017.
The Company is exposed to potential losses related to financial instruments in the event of counterparties' nonperformance. The Company has established controls to determine and monitor the creditworthiness of counterparties in order to mitigate the Company's exposure to counterparty credit risk.
Comprehensive Income
The objective of comprehensive income is to report a measure of all changes in common stock equity of an enterprise that result from transactions and other economic events of the period other than transactions with owners. Comprehensive income consists of net income, changes in the fair value of qualifying cash flow hedges, and reclassifications for amounts included in net income.
2. RETIREMENT BENEFITS
The Company has a defined benefit, trusteed, pension plan covering substantially all employees. This qualified pension plan is funded in accordance with requirements of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974, as amended (ERISA). No contributions to the qualified pension plan were made for the year ended December 31, 2017 and no mandatory contributions to the qualified pension plan are anticipated for the year ending December 31, 2018. The Company also provides certain defined benefit pension plans for a selected group of management and highly compensated employees. Benefits under these non-qualified pension plans are funded on a cash basis. In addition, the Company provides certain medical care and life insurance benefits for retired employees through other postretirement benefit plans. The Company funds its other postretirement trusts to the extent required by the FERC. For the year ending December 31, 2018, no other postretirement trust contributions are expected.
Actuarial Assumptions
The weighted average rates assumed in the actuarial calculations used to determine both the net periodic costs for the pension and other postretirement benefit plans for the following year and the benefit obligations as of the measurement date are presented below.

NOTES (continued)
Gulf Power Company 2017 Annual Report

Assumptions used to determine net periodic costs:2017 2016 2015
Pension plans     
Discount rate – benefit obligations4.46% 4.71% 4.18%
Discount rate – interest costs3.82
 3.97
 4.18
Discount rate – service costs4.81
 5.04
 4.48
Expected long-term return on plan assets7.95
 8.20
 8.20
Annual salary increase4.46
 4.46
 3.59
Other postretirement benefit plans     
Discount rate – benefit obligations4.25% 4.51% 4.04%
Discount rate – interest costs3.56
 3.68
 4.04
Discount rate – service costs4.62
 4.88
 4.38
Expected long-term return on plan assets7.81
 8.05
 8.07
Annual salary increase4.46
 4.46
 3.59
Assumptions used to determine benefit obligations:2017
2016
Pension plans


Discount rate3.82%
4.46%
Annual salary increase4.46

4.46
Other postretirement benefit plans


Discount rate3.69%
4.25%
Annual salary increase4.46

4.46
The Company estimates the expected rate of return on pension plan and other postretirement benefit plan assets using a financial model to project the expected return on each current investment portfolio. The analysis projects an expected rate of return on each of eight different asset classes in order to arrive at the expected return on the entire portfolio relying on each trust's target asset allocation and reasonable capital market assumptions. The financial model is based on four key inputs: anticipated returns by asset class (based in part on historical returns), each trust's target asset allocation, an anticipated inflation rate, and the projected impact of a periodic rebalancing of each trust's portfolio.
An additional assumption used in measuring the accumulated other postretirement benefit obligations (APBO) was a weighted average medical care cost trend rate. The weighted average medical care cost trend rates used in measuring the APBO as of December 31, 2017 were as follows:
 Initial Cost Trend Rate Ultimate Cost Trend Rate Year That Ultimate Rate is Reached
Pre-656.50% 4.50% 2026
Post-65 medical5.00
 4.50
 2026
Post-65 prescription10.00
 4.50
 2026
An annual increase or decrease in the assumed medical care cost trend rate of 1% would affect the APBO and the service and interest cost components at December 31, 2017 as follows:
 
1 Percent
Increase
 
1 Percent
Decrease
 (in millions)
Benefit obligation$4
 $3
Service and interest costs
 

NOTES (continued)
Gulf Power Company 2017 Annual Report

Pension Plans
The total accumulated benefit obligation for the pension plans was $524 million at December 31, 2017 and $460 million at December 31, 2016. Changes in the projected benefit obligations and the fair value of plan assets during the plan years ended December 31, 2017 and 2016 were as follows:
 2017 2016
 (in millions)
Change in benefit obligation   
Benefit obligation at beginning of year$517
 $480
Service cost13
 12
Interest cost19
 19
Benefits paid(20) (17)
Actuarial (gain) loss58
 23
Balance at end of year587
 517
Change in plan assets   
Fair value of plan assets at beginning of year491
 420
Actual return (loss) on plan assets81
 39
Employer contributions1
 49
Benefits paid(20) (17)
Fair value of plan assets at end of year553
 491
Accrued liability$(34) $(26)
At December 31, 2017, the projected benefit obligations for the qualified and non-qualified pension plans were $563 million and $25 million, respectively. All pension plan assets are related to the qualified pension plan.
Amounts recognized on the balance sheets at December 31, 2017 and 2016 related to the Company's pension plans consist of the following:
 2017 2016
 (in millions)
Other regulatory assets, deferred$160
 $153
Other current liabilities(1) (1)
Employee benefit obligations(33) (25)
Presented below are the amounts included in regulatory assets at December 31, 2017 and 2016 related to the defined benefit pension plans that had not yet been recognized in net periodic pension cost along with the estimated amortization of such amounts for 2018.
 2017 2016 Estimated Amortization in 2018
 (in millions)
Prior service cost$2
 $3
 $
Net (gain) loss158
 150
 10
Regulatory assets$160
 $153
  

NOTES (continued)
Gulf Power Company 2017 Annual Report

The changes in the balance of regulatory assets related to the defined benefit pension plans for the years ended December 31, 2017 and 2016 are presented in the following table:

2017 2016

(in millions)
Regulatory assets:

 

Beginning balance$153
 $142
Net (gain) loss15
 16
Change in prior service costs
 2
Reclassification adjustments:
 
Amortization of prior service costs(1) (1)
Amortization of net gain (loss)(7) (6)
Total reclassification adjustments(8) (7)
Total change7
 11
Ending balance$160
 $153
Components of net periodic pension cost were as follows:
 2017 2016 2015
 (in millions)
Service cost$13
 $12
 $12
Interest cost19
 19
 20
Expected return on plan assets(38) (34) (32)
Recognized net (gain) loss7
 6
 9
Net amortization1
 1
 1
Net periodic pension cost$2
 $4
 $10
Net periodic pension cost is the sum of service cost, interest cost, and other costs netted against the expected return on plan assets. The expected return on plan assets is determined by multiplying the expected rate of return on plan assets and the market-related value of plan assets. In determining the market-related value of plan assets, the Company has elected to amortize changes in the market value of all plan assets over five years rather than recognize the changes immediately. As a result, the accounting value of plan assets that is used to calculate the expected return on plan assets differs from the current fair value of the plan assets.
Future benefit payments reflect expected future service and are estimated based on assumptions used to measure the projected benefit obligation for the pension plans. At December 31, 2017, estimated benefit payments were as follows:
 
Benefit
Payments
 (in millions)
2018$22
201923
202025
202126
202228
2023 to 2027155

NOTES (continued)
Gulf Power Company 2017 Annual Report

Other Postretirement Benefits
Changes in the APBO and in the fair value of plan assets during the plan years ended December 31, 2017 and 2016 were as follows:
 2017 2016
 (in millions)
Change in benefit obligation   
Benefit obligation at beginning of year$83
 $81
Service cost1
 1
Interest cost3
 3
Benefits paid(5) (4)
Actuarial (gain) loss1
 2
Balance at end of year83
 83
Change in plan assets   
Fair value of plan assets at beginning of year18
 17
Actual return (loss) on plan assets3
 2
Employer contributions4
 3
Benefits paid(5) (4)
Fair value of plan assets at end of year20
 18
Accrued liability$(63) $(65)
Amounts recognized on the balance sheets at December 31, 2017 and 2016 related to the Company's other postretirement benefit plans consist of the following:
 2017 2016
 (in millions)
Other regulatory assets, deferred$8
 $11
Other current liabilities(1) (1)
Other regulatory liabilities, deferred(2) (4)
Employee benefit obligations(62) (64)
Approximately $6 million and $7 million was included in net regulatory assets at December 31, 2017 and 2016, respectively, related to the net loss for the other postretirement benefit plans that had not yet been recognized in net periodic other postretirement benefit cost. The estimated amortization of such amounts for 2018 is immaterial.
The changes in the balance of net regulatory assets (liabilities) related to the other postretirement benefit plans for the plan years ended December 31, 2017 and 2016 are presented in the following table:

2017 2016

(in millions)
Net regulatory assets (liabilities):

 

Beginning balance$7
 $5
Net (gain) loss(1) 2
Ending balance$6
 $7

NOTES (continued)
Gulf Power Company 2017 Annual Report

Components of the other postretirement benefit plans' net periodic cost were as follows:
 2017 2016 2015
 (in millions)
Service cost$1
 $1
 $1
Interest cost3
 3
 3
Expected return on plan assets(1) (1) (1)
Net periodic postretirement benefit cost$3
 $3
 $3
Future benefit payments, including prescription drug benefits, reflect expected future service and are estimated based on assumptions used to measure the APBO for the other postretirement benefit plans. Estimated benefit payments are reduced by drug subsidy receipts expected as a result of the Medicare Prescription Drug, Improvement, and Modernization Act of 2003 as follows:
 
Benefit
Payments
 
Subsidy
Receipts
 Total
 (in millions)
2018$5
 $
 $5
20195
 
 5
20205
 
 5
20216
 (1) 5
20226
 (1) 5
2023 to 202728
 (2) 26
Benefit Plan Assets
Pension plan and other postretirement benefit plan assets are managed and invested in accordance with all applicable requirements, including ERISA and the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended. The Company's investment policies for both the pension plan and the other postretirement benefit plans cover a diversified mix of assets, including equity and fixed income securities, real estate, and private equity. Derivative instruments are used primarily to gain efficient exposure to the various asset classes and as hedging tools. The Company minimizes the risk of large losses primarily through diversification but also monitors and manages other aspects of risk.

NOTES (continued)
Gulf Power Company 2017 Annual Report

The composition of the Company's pension plan and other postretirement benefit plan assets as of December 31, 2017 and 2016, along with the targeted mix of assets for each plan, is presented below:
 Target 2017 2016
Pension plan assets:     
Domestic equity26% 31% 29%
International equity25
 25
 22
Fixed income23
 24
 29
Special situations3
 1
 2
Real estate investments14
 13
 13
Private equity9
 6
 5
Total100% 100% 100%
Other postretirement benefit plan assets:     
Domestic equity25% 30% 28%
International equity24
 24
 21
Domestic fixed income25
 26
 31
Special situations3
 1
 2
Real estate investments14
 13
 13
Private equity9
 6
 5
Total100% 100% 100%
The investment strategy for plan assets related to the Company's qualified pension plan is to be broadly diversified across major asset classes. The asset allocation is established after consideration of various factors that affect the assets and liabilities of the pension plan including, but not limited to, historical and expected returns and interest rates, volatility, correlations of asset classes, the current level of assets and liabilities, and the assumed growth in assets and liabilities. Because a significant portion of the liability of the pension plan is long-term in nature, the assets are invested consistent with long-term investment expectations for return and risk. To manage the actual asset class exposures relative to the target asset allocation, the Company employs a formal rebalancing program. As additional risk management, external investment managers and service providers are subject to written guidelines to ensure appropriate and prudent investment practices. Management believes the portfolio is well-diversified with no significant concentrations of risk.
Investment Strategies
Detailed below is a description of the investment strategies for each major asset category for the pension and other postretirement benefit plans disclosed above:
Domestic equity. A mix of large and small capitalization stocks with generally an equal distribution of value and growth attributes, managed both actively and through passive index approaches.
International equity. A mix of growth stocks and value stocks with both developed and emerging market exposure, managed both actively and through passive index approaches.
Fixed income. A mix of domestic and international bonds.
Special situations. Investments in opportunistic strategies with the objective of diversifying and enhancing returns and exploiting short-term inefficiencies as well as investments in promising new strategies of a longer-term nature.
Real estate investments. Investments in traditional private market, equity-oriented investments in real properties (indirectly through pooled funds or partnerships) and in publicly traded real estate securities.
Private equity. Investments in private partnerships that invest in private or public securities typically through privately-negotiated and/or structured transactions, including leveraged buyouts, venture capital, and distressed debt.
Benefit Plan Asset Fair Values
Following are the fair value measurements for the pension plan and the other postretirement benefit plan assets as of December 31, 2017 and 2016. The fair values presented are prepared in accordance with GAAP. For purposes of determining the fair value of the pension plan and other postretirement benefit plan assets and the appropriate level designation, management

NOTES (continued)
Gulf Power Company 2017 Annual Report

relies on information provided by the plan's trustee. This information is reviewed and evaluated by management with changes made to the trustee information as appropriate.
Valuation methods of the primary fair value measurements disclosed in the following tables are as follows:
Domestic and international equity.Investments in equity securities such as common stocks, American depositary receipts, and real estate investment trusts that trade on a public exchange are classified as Level 1 investments and are valued at the closing price in the active market. Equity investments with unpublished prices (i.e. pooled funds) are valued as Level 2, when the underlying holdings used to value the investment are comprised of Level 1 or Level 2 equity securities.
Fixed income.Investments in fixed income securities are generally classified as Level 2 investments and are valued based on prices reported in the market place. Additionally, the value of fixed income securities takes into consideration certain items such as broker quotes, spreads, yield curves, interest rates, and discount rates that apply to the term of a specific instrument.
Real estate investments, private equity, and special situations investments.Investments in real estate, private equity, and special situations are generally classified as Net Asset Value as a Practical Expedient, since the underlying assets typically do not have publicly available observable inputs. The fund manager values the assets using various inputs and techniques depending on the nature of the underlying investments. Techniques may include purchase multiples for comparable transactions, comparable public company trading multiples, discounted cash flow analysis, prevailing market capitalization rates, recent sales of comparable investments, and independent third-party appraisals. The fair value of partnerships is determined by aggregating the value of the underlying assets less liabilities.
The fair values of pension plan assets as of December 31, 2017 and 2016 are presented below. These fair value measurements exclude cash, receivables related to investment income, pending investments sales, and payables related to pending investment purchases.
 Fair Value Measurements Using  
 Quoted Prices in Active Markets for Identical Assets Significant Other Observable Inputs Significant Unobservable Inputs Net Asset Value as a Practical Expedient  
As of December 31, 2017:(Level 1) (Level 2) (Level 3) (NAV) Total
 (in millions)
Assets:         
Domestic equity(*)
$112
 $54
 $
 $
 $166
International equity(*)
72
 65
 
 
 137
Fixed income:         
U.S. Treasury, government, and agency bonds
 39
 
 
 39
Corporate bonds
 57
 
 
 57
Pooled funds
 30
 
 
 30
Cash equivalents and other10
 
 
 
 10
Real estate investments22
 
 
 55
 77
Special situations
 
 
 8
 8
Private equity
 
 
 31
 31
Total$216
 $245
 $
 $94
 $555
(*)Level 1 securities consist of actively traded stocks while Level 2 securities consist of pooled funds.

NOTES (continued)
Gulf Power Company 2017 Annual Report

 Fair Value Measurements Using  
 Quoted Prices in Active Markets for Identical Assets Significant Other Observable Inputs Significant Unobservable Inputs Net Asset Value as a Practical Expedient  
As of December 31, 2016:(Level 1) (Level 2) (Level 3) (NAV) Total
 (in millions)
Assets:         
Domestic equity(*)
$93
 $43
 $
 $
 $136
International equity(*)
57
 52
 
 
 109
Fixed income:         
U.S. Treasury, government, and agency bonds
 27
 
 
 27
Mortgage- and asset-backed securities
 1
 
 
 1
Corporate bonds
 47
 
 
 47
Pooled funds
 24
 
 
 24
Cash equivalents and other46
 
 
 
 46
Real estate investments14
 
 
 53
 67
Special situations
 
 
 8
 8
Private equity
 
 
 25
 25
Total$210
 $194
 $
 $86
 $490
(*)Level 1 securities consist of actively traded stocks while Level 2 securities consist of pooled funds.
The fair values of other postretirement benefit plan assets as of December 31, 2017 and 2016 are presented below. These fair value measurements exclude cash, receivables related to investment income, pending investments sales, and payables related to pending investment purchases.
 Fair Value Measurements Using  
 Quoted Prices in Active Markets for Identical Assets Significant Other Observable Inputs Significant Unobservable Inputs Net Asset Value as a Practical Expedient  
As of December 31, 2017:(Level 1) (Level 2) (Level 3) (NAV) Total
 (in millions)
Assets:         
Domestic equity(*)
$4
 $2
 $
 $
 $6
International equity(*)
2
 2
 
 
 4
Fixed income:         
U.S. Treasury, government, and agency bonds
 1
 
 
 1
Corporate bonds
 2
 
 
 2
Pooled funds
 1
 
 
 1
Cash equivalents and other1
 
 
 
 1
Real estate investments1
 
 
 2
 3
Private equity
 
 
 1
 1
Total$8
 $8
 $
 $3
 $19
(*)Level 1 securities consist of actively traded stocks while Level 2 securities consist of pooled funds.

NOTES (continued)
Gulf Power Company 2017 Annual Report

 Fair Value Measurements Using  
 Quoted Prices in Active Markets for Identical Assets Significant Other Observable Inputs Significant Unobservable Inputs Net Asset Value as a Practical Expedient  
As of December 31, 2016:(Level 1) (Level 2) (Level 3) (NAV) Total
 (in millions)
Assets:         
Domestic equity(*)
$3
 $2
 $
 $
 $5
International equity(*)
2
 2
 
 
 4
Fixed income:         
U.S. Treasury, government, and agency bonds
 1
 
 
 1
Corporate bonds
 2
 
 
 2
Pooled funds
 1
 
 
 1
Cash equivalents and other2
 
 
 
 2
Real estate investments1
 
 
 2
 3
Private equity
 
 
 1
 1
Total$8
 $8
 $
 $3
 $19
(*)Level 1 securities consist of actively traded stocks while Level 2 securities consist of pooled funds.
Employee Savings Plan
The Company also sponsors a 401(k) defined contribution plan covering substantially all employees. The Company matches a portion of the first 6% of employee base salary contributions. The maximum Company match is 5.1% of an employee's base salary. Total matching contributions made to the plan for 2017, 2016, and 2015 were $5 million, $5 million, and $4 million, respectively.
3. CONTINGENCIES AND REGULATORY MATTERS
General Litigation Matters
The Company is subject to certain claims and legal actions arising in the ordinary course of business. In addition, the Company's business activities are subject to extensive governmental regulation related to public health and the environment, such as regulation of air emissions and water discharges. Litigation over environmental issues and claims of various types, including property damage, personal injury, common law nuisance, and citizen enforcement of environmental requirements such as standards for air, water, land, and protection of natural resources has occurred throughout the U.S. This litigation has included claims for damages alleged to have been caused by CO2 and other emissions, CCR, and alleged exposure to hazardous materials, and/or requests for injunctive relief in connection with such matters. The ultimate outcome of such pending or potential litigation against the Company cannot be predicted at this time; however, for current proceedings not specifically reported herein, management does not anticipate that the ultimate liabilities, if any, arising from such current proceedings would have a material effect on the Company's financial statements.
Environmental Matters
Environmental Remediation
The Company must comply with environmental laws and regulations governing the handling and disposal of waste and releases of hazardous substances. Under these various laws and regulations, the Company may also incur substantial costs to clean up affected sites. The Company received authority from the Florida PSC to recover approved environmental compliance costs through the environmental cost recovery clause. The Florida PSC reviews costs and adjusts rates up or down annually.
The Company recognizes a liability for environmental remediation costs only when it determines a loss is probable and reasonably estimable. At December 31, 2017 and 2016, the Company's environmental remediation liability included estimated costs of environmental remediation projects of approximately $52 million and $44 million, respectively, of which approximately

NOTES (continued)
Gulf Power Company 2017 Annual Report

$5 million and $4 million, respectively, is included in under recovered regulatory clause revenues and other current liabilities and approximately $47 million and $40 million, respectively, is included in other regulatory assets, deferred and other deferred credits and liabilities. These estimated costs primarily relate to site closure criteria by the Florida Department of Environmental Protection (FDEP) for potential impacts to soil and groundwater from herbicide applications at the Company's substations. The schedule for completion of the remediation projects is subject to FDEP approval. The projects have been approved by the Florida PSC for recovery through the Company's environmental cost recovery clause; therefore, these liabilities have no impact on net income.
The final outcome of these matters cannot be determined at this time. However, the final disposition of these matters is not expected to have a material impact on the Company's financial statements.
FERC Matters
The Company has authority from the FERC to sell electricity at market-based rates. Since 2008, that authority, for certain balancing authority areas, has been conditioned on compliance with the requirements of an energy auction, which the FERC found to be tailored mitigation that addresses potential market power concerns. In accordance with FERC regulations governing such authority, the traditional electric operating companies (including the Company) and Southern Power filed a triennial market power analysis in 2014, which included continued reliance on the energy auction as tailored mitigation. In 2015, the FERC issued an order finding that the traditional electric operating companies' (including the Company's) and Southern Power's existing tailored mitigation may not effectively mitigate the potential to exert market power in certain areas served by the traditional electric operating companies and in some adjacent areas. The FERC directed the traditional electric operating companies (including the Company) and Southern Power to show why market-based rate authority should not be revoked in these areas or to provide a mitigation plan to further address market power concerns. The traditional electric operating companies (including the Company) and Southern Power filed a request for rehearing and filed their response with the FERC in 2015.
In December 2016, the traditional electric operating companies (including the Company) and Southern Power filed an amendment to their market-based rate tariff that proposed certain changes to the energy auction, as well as several non-tariff changes. On February 2, 2017, the FERC issued an order accepting all such changes subject to an additional condition of cost-based price caps for certain sales outside of the energy auction, finding that all of these changes would provide adequate alternative mitigation for the traditional electric operating companies' (including the Company's) and Southern Power's potential to exert market power in certain areas served by the traditional electric operating companies (including the Company) and in some adjacent areas. On May 17, 2017, the FERC accepted the traditional electric operating companies' (including the Company's) and Southern Power's compliance filing accepting the terms of the order. While the FERC's February 2, 2017 order references the market power proceeding discussed above, it remains a separate, ongoing matter.
On October 25, 2017, the FERC issued an order in response to the traditional electric operating companies' (including the Company's) and Southern Power's June 29, 2017 triennial updated market power analysis. The FERC directed the traditional electric operating companies (including the Company) and Southern Power to show cause within 60 days why market-based rate authority should not be revoked in certain areas adjacent to the area presently under mitigation in accordance with the February 2, 2017 order or to provide a mitigation plan to further address market power concerns. On November 10, 2017, the traditional electric operating companies (including the Company) and Southern Power responded to the FERC and proposed to resolve matters by applying the alternative mitigation authorized by the February 2, 2017 order to the adjacent areas made the subject of the October 25, 2017 order.
The ultimate outcome of these matters cannot be determined at this time.
Retail Regulatory Matters
The Company's rates and charges for service to retail customers are subject to the regulatory oversight of the Florida PSC. The Company's rates are a combination of base rates and several separate cost recovery clauses for specific categories of costs. These separate cost recovery clauses address such items as fuel and purchased energy costs, purchased power capacity costs, energy conservation and demand side management programs, and the costs of compliance with environmental laws and regulations. Costs not addressed through one of the specific cost recovery clauses are recovered through the Company's base rates.
Retail Base Rate Cases
In the 2013 Rate Case Settlement Agreement, the Florida PSC authorized the Company to reduce depreciation and record a regulatory asset up to $62.5 million from January 2014 through June 2017. In any given month, such depreciation reduction was not to exceed the amount necessary for the retail ROE, as reported to the Florida PSC monthly, to reach the midpoint of the authorized retail ROE range then in effect. For 2014 and 2015, the Company recognized reductions in depreciation of $8.4 million

NOTES (continued)
Gulf Power Company 2017 Annual Report

and $20.1 million, respectively. No net reduction in depreciation was recorded in 2016. In 2017, the Company recognized the remaining $34.0 million reduction in depreciation.
On April 4, 2017, the Florida PSC approved the 2017 Rate Case Settlement Agreement among the Company and three intervenors with respect to the Company's request in 2016 to increase retail base rates. Among the terms of the 2017 Rate Case Settlement Agreement, the Company increased rates effective with the first billing cycle in July 2017 to provide an annual overall net customer impact of approximately $54.3 million. The net customer impact consisted of a $62.0 million increase in annual base revenues, less an annual purchased power capacity cost recovery clause credit for certain wholesale revenues of approximately $8 million through December 2019. In addition, the Company continued its authorized retail ROE midpoint (10.25%) and range (9.25% to 11.25%), is deemed to have a maximum equity ratio of 52.5% for all retail regulatory purposes, and implemented new dismantlement accruals effective July 1, 2017. The Company also began amortizing the regulatory asset associated with the investment balances remaining after the retirement of Plant Smith Units 1 and 2 (357 MWs) over 15 years effective January 1, 2018 and implemented new depreciation rates effective January 1, 2018. The 2017 Rate Case Settlement Agreement also resulted in a $32.5 million write-down of the Company's ownership of Plant Scherer Unit 3 (205 MWs), which was recorded in the first quarter 2017. The remaining issues related to the inclusion of the Company's investment in Plant Scherer Unit 3 in retail rates have been resolved as a result of the 2017 Rate Case Settlement Agreement, including recoverability of certain costs associated with the ongoing ownership and operation of the unit through the environmental cost recovery clause.
The 2017 Rate Case Settlement Agreement set forth a process for addressing the revenue requirement effects of the Tax Reform Legislation through a prospective change to the Company's base rates. Under the terms of the 2017 Rate Case Settlement Agreement, by March 1, 2018, the Company must identify the revenue requirements impacts and defer them to a regulatory asset or regulatory liability to be considered for prospective application in a change to base rates in a limited scope proceeding before the Florida PSC. In lieu of this approach, on February 14, 2018, the parties to the 2017 Rate Case Settlement Agreement filed a new stipulation and settlement agreement (2018 Tax Reform Settlement Agreement) with the Florida PSC. If approved, the 2018 Tax Reform Settlement Agreement will result in annual reductions of $18.2 million to the Company's base rates and $15.6 million to the Company's environmental cost recovery rates effective beginning the first calendar month following approval.
The 2018 Tax Reform Settlement Agreement also provides for a one-time refund of $69.4 million for the retail portion of unprotected (not subject to normalization) deferred tax liabilities through the Company's fuel cost recovery rate over the remainder of 2018. In addition, a limited scope proceeding to address the flow back of protected deferred tax liabilities will be initiated by May 1, 2018 and the Company will record a regulatory liability for the related 2018 amounts eligible to be returned to customers consistent with IRS normalization principles. Unless otherwise agreed to by the parties to the 2018 Tax Reform Settlement Agreement, amounts recorded in this regulatory liability will be refunded to retail customers in 2019 through the Company's fuel cost recovery rate.
If the 2018 Tax Reform Settlement Agreement is approved, the 2017 Rate Case Settlement Agreement will be amended to increase the Company's maximum equity ratio from 52.5% to 53.5% for regulatory purposes.
The ultimate outcome of these matters cannot be determined at this time.
Cost Recovery Clauses
As discussed previously, the 2017 Rate Case Settlement Agreement resolved the remaining issues related to the Company's inclusion of certain costs associated with the ongoing ownership and operation of Plant Scherer Unit 3 in the environmental cost recovery clause and no adjustment to the environmental cost recovery clause rate approved by the Florida PSC in November 2016 was made.
On October 25, 2017, the Florida PSC approved the Company's annual clause rate request for its fuel, purchased power capacity, environmental, and energy conservation cost recovery factors for 2018. The net effect of the approved changes is a $63 million increase in annual revenues effective in January 2018, the majority of which will be offset by related expense increases.
Revenues for all cost recovery clauses, as recorded on the financial statements, are adjusted for differences in actual recoverable costs and amounts billed in current regulated rates. Accordingly, changes in the billing factor for fuel and purchased power will have no significant effect on the Company's revenues or net income, but will affect annual cash flow. The recovery provisions for environmental compliance and energy conservation include related expenses and a return on net average investment.
Retail Fuel Cost Recovery
The Company has established fuel cost recovery rates as approved by the Florida PSC. If, at any time during the year, the projected year-end fuel cost over or under recovery balance exceeds 10% of the projected fuel revenue applicable for the period, the Company is required to notify the Florida PSC and indicate if an adjustment to the fuel cost recovery factor is being requested.

NOTES (continued)
Gulf Power Company 2017 Annual Report

At December 31, 2017, the under recovered fuel balance was approximately $22 million, which is included in under recovered regulatory clause revenues on the balance sheet. At December 31, 2016, the over recovered fuel balance was approximately $15 million, which is included in other regulatory liabilities, current on the balance sheet.
Purchased Power Capacity Recovery
The Company has established purchased power capacity cost recovery rates as approved by the Florida PSC. If the projected year-end purchased power capacity cost over or under recovery balance exceeds 10% of the projected purchased power capacity revenue applicable for the period, the Company is required to notify the Florida PSC and indicate if an adjustment to the purchased power capacity cost recovery factor is being requested.
At December 31, 2017, the under recovered purchased power capacity balance was $2 million, which is included in under recovered regulatory clause revenues on the balance sheet. At December 31, 2016, the balance was immaterial.
Environmental Cost Recovery
The Florida Legislature adopted legislation for an environmental cost recovery clause, which allows an electric utility to petition the Florida PSC for recovery of prudent environmental compliance costs that are not being recovered through base rates or any other recovery mechanism. Such environmental costs include operations and maintenance expenses, emissions allowance expense, depreciation, and a return on net average investment. This legislation also allows recovery of costs incurred as a result of an agreement between the Company and the FDEP for the purpose of ensuring compliance with ozone ambient air quality standards adopted by the EPA.
Annually, the Company seeks recovery of projected costs including any true-up amounts from prior periods. At December 31, 2017 and 2016, the over recovered environmental balance of approximately $11 million and $8 million, respectively, along with the current portion of projected environmental expenditures, was included in under recovered regulatory clause revenues on the balance sheets.
Energy Conservation Cost Recovery
Every five years, the Florida PSC establishes new numeric conservation goals covering a 10-year period for utilities to reduce annual energy and seasonal peak demand using demand-side management (DSM) programs. After the goals are established, utilities develop plans and programs to meet the approved goals. The costs for these programs are recovered through rates established annually in the energy conservation cost recovery (ECCR) clause.
At December 31, 2017, the under recovered ECCR balance was immaterial. At December 31, 2016, the balance was approximately $4 million, which is included in under recovered regulatory clause revenues on the balance sheet.
Other Matters
As a result of the cost to comply with environmental regulations imposed by the EPA, the Company retired its coal-fired generation at Plant Smith Units 1 and 2 in March 2016. In August 2016, the Florida PSC approved the Company's request to reclassify the remaining net book value of Plant Smith Units 1 and 2 and the remaining materials and supplies associated with these units as of the retirement date, totaling approximately $63 million, to a regulatory asset. The Company began amortizing the investment balances over 15 years effective January 1, 2018 in accordance with the 2017 Rate Case Settlement Agreement.
4. JOINT OWNERSHIP AGREEMENTS
The Company and Mississippi Power jointly own Plant Daniel Units 1 and 2, which together represent capacity of 1,000 MWs. Plant Daniel is a generating plant located in Jackson County, Mississippi. In accordance with the operating agreement, Mississippi Power acts as the Company's agent with respect to the construction, operation, and maintenance of these units.
The Company and Georgia Power jointly own the 818-MW capacity Plant Scherer Unit 3. Plant Scherer is a generating plant located near Forsyth, Georgia. In accordance with the operating agreement, Georgia Power acts as the Company's agent with respect to the construction, operation, and maintenance of the unit.

NOTES (continued)
Gulf Power Company 2017 Annual Report

At December 31, 2017, the Company's percentage ownership and investment in these jointly-owned facilities were as follows:
 
Plant Scherer
Unit 3 (coal)
 Plant Daniel Units 1 & 2 (coal)
 (in millions)
Plant in service$374
  $696
Accumulated depreciation147
  225
Construction work in progress9
  4
Company ownership25%  50%
The Company's proportionate share of its plant operating expenses is included in the corresponding operating expenses in the statements of income and the Company is responsible for providing its own financing.
5. INCOME TAXES
On behalf of the Company, Southern Company files a consolidated federal income tax return and various combined and separate state income tax returns. Under a joint consolidated income tax allocation agreement, each Southern Company subsidiary's current and deferred tax expense is computed on a stand-alone basis and no subsidiary is allocated more current expense than would be paid if it filed a separate income tax return. In accordance with IRS regulations, each company is jointly and severally liable for the federal tax liability.
Federal Tax Reform Legislation
Following the enactment of the Tax Reform Legislation, the SEC staff issued Staff Accounting Bulletin 118 – "Income Tax Accounting Implications of the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act" (SAB 118), which provides for a measurement period of up to one year from the enactment date to complete accounting under GAAP for the tax effects of the legislation. Due to the complex and comprehensive nature of the enacted tax law changes, and their application under GAAP, the Company considers all amounts recorded in the financial statements as a result of the Tax Reform Legislation to be "provisional" as discussed in SAB 118 and subject to revision. The Company is awaiting additional guidance from industry and income tax authorities in order to finalize its accounting. The ultimate impact of the Tax Reform Legislation on deferred income tax assets and liabilities and the related regulatory assets and liabilities cannot be determined at this time. See Note 3 under "Retail Regulatory Matters" for additional information.
Current and Deferred Income Taxes
Details of income tax provisions are as follows:
 2017 2016 2015
 (in millions)
Federal -     
Current$19
 $34
 $(3)
Deferred58
 45
 80
 77
 79
 77
State -     
Current(1) 
 5
Deferred14
 12
 10
 13
 12
 15
Total$90
 $91
 $92

NOTES (continued)
Gulf Power Company 2017 Annual Report

The tax effects of temporary differences between the carrying amounts of assets and liabilities in the financial statements and their respective tax bases, which give rise to deferred tax assets and liabilities, are as follows:
 2017 2016
 (in millions)
Deferred tax liabilities-   
Accelerated depreciation$552
 $834
Property basis differences105
 123
Pension and other employee benefits38
 58
Regulatory assets22
 45
Regulatory assets associated with employee benefit obligations44
 65
Regulatory assets associated with asset retirement obligations38
 55
Other13
 12
Total812
 1,192
Deferred tax assets-   
Federal effect of state deferred taxes25
 37
Postretirement benefits17
 26
Pension and other employee benefits49
 72
Property differences98
 1
Regulatory liability associated with Tax Reform Legislation (not subject to normalization)19
 
Property reserve10
 17
Asset retirement obligations38
 55
Alternative minimum tax carryforward7
 18
Other12
 18
Total275
 244
Accumulated deferred income taxes$537
 $948
The implementation of the Tax Reform Legislation significantly reduced accumulated deferred income taxes, partially offset by bonus depreciation provisions in the Protecting Americans from Tax Hikes Act. The Tax Reform Legislation also significantly reduced tax-related regulatory assets and increased tax-related regulatory liabilities.
At December 31, 2017, tax-related regulatory assets to be recovered from customers were $31 million. These assets are primarily attributable to tax benefits flowed through to customers in prior years, deferred taxes previously recognized at rates lower than the current enacted tax law, and taxes applicable to capitalized interest.
At December 31, 2017, the tax-related regulatory liabilities to be credited to customers were $458 million. These liabilities are primarily attributable to deferred taxes previously recognized at rates higher than the current enacted tax law and unamortized ITCs.
Effective Tax Rate
A reconciliation of the federal statutory income tax rate to the effective income tax rate is as follows:
 2017 2016 2015
Federal statutory rate35.0% 35.0% 35.0%
State income tax, net of federal deduction3.7 3.4 3.9
Non-deductible book depreciation0.2 0.6 0.5
Differences in prior years' deferred and current tax rates (0.1) (0.1)
AFUDC equity  (1.8)
Other, net0.5 0.6 (0.6)
Effective income tax rate39.4% 39.5% 36.9%

NOTES (continued)
Gulf Power Company 2017 Annual Report

In March 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-09, which changed the accounting for income taxes for share-based payment award transactions. Entities are required to recognize all excess tax benefits and deficiencies related to the exercise or vesting of stock compensation as income tax expense or benefit in the income statement. The adoption of ASU 2016-09 did not have a material impact on the Company's overall effective tax rate. See Note 1 under "Recently Issued Accounting Standards" for additional information.
Unrecognized Tax Benefits
The Company has no material unrecognized tax benefits for the periods presented. The Company classifies interest on tax uncertainties as interest expense. Accrued interest for unrecognized tax benefits was immaterial and the Company did not accrue any penalties on uncertain tax positions.
It is reasonably possible that the amount of the unrecognized tax benefits could change within 12 months. The settlement of federal and state audits could impact the balances, but an estimate of the range of reasonably possible outcomes cannot be determined at this time.
The IRS has finalized its audits of Southern Company's consolidated federal income tax returns through 2016. Southern Company is a participant in the Compliance Assurance Process of the IRS. The audits for the Company's state income tax returns have either been concluded, or the statute of limitations has expired, for years prior to 2011.
6. FINANCING
Securities Due Within One Year
At December 31, 2017, the Company had no long-term debt due within one year. At December 31, 2016, the Company had $87 million of long-term debt due within one year.
Maturities through 2022 applicable to total long-term debt include $175 million in 2020 and $141 million in 2022. There are no scheduled maturities in 2018, 2019, or 2021.
Bank Term Loans
At December 31, 2016, the Company had $100 million of bank term loans outstanding. In March 2017, the Company extended the maturity of its $100 million short-term floating rate bank loan bearing interest based on one-month LIBOR from April 2017 to October 2017 and subsequently repaid the loan in May 2017.
Senior Notes
At December 31, 2017 and 2016, the Company had a total of $990 million and $777 million of senior notes outstanding, respectively. These senior notes are effectively subordinate to all secured debt of the Company, which totaled approximately $41 million at both December 31, 2017 and 2016.
In May 2017, the Company issued $300 million aggregate principal amount of Series 2017A 3.30% Senior Notes due May 30, 2027. The proceeds, together with other funds, were used to repay at maturity $85 million aggregate principal amount of Series 2007A 5.90% Senior Notes due June 15, 2017, to repay outstanding commercial paper borrowings, to repay a $100 million short-term floating rate bank loan, and to redeem, in June 2017, all outstanding shares of preference stock. See "Bank Term Loans" and "Outstanding Classes of Capital Stock" herein for more information.
Pollution Control Revenue Bonds
Pollution control revenue bond obligations represent loans to the Company from public authorities of funds derived from sales by such authorities of revenue bonds issued to finance pollution control and solid waste disposal facilities. The Company is required to make payments sufficient for the authorities to meet principal and interest requirements of such bonds. The amount of tax-exempt pollution control revenue bond obligations outstanding at December 31, 2017 and 2016 was $309 million.
Outstanding Classes of Capital Stock
The Company currently has preferred stock, Class A preferred stock, preference stock, and common stock authorized. The Company's preferred stock and Class A preferred stock, without preference between classes, would rank senior to the Company's preference stock and common stock with respect to payment of dividends and voluntary or involuntary dissolution. No shares of preferred stock or Class A preferred stock were outstanding at December 31, 2017. The Company's preference stock would rank senior to the common stock with respect to the payment of dividends and voluntary or involuntary dissolution. No shares of preference stock were outstanding at December 31, 2017. In June 2017, the Company redeemed 550,000 shares ($55 million

NOTES (continued)
Gulf Power Company 2017 Annual Report

aggregate liquidation amount) of 6.00% Series Preference Stock, 450,000 shares ($45 million aggregate liquidation amount) of Series 2007A 6.45% Preference Stock, and 500,000 shares ($50 million aggregate liquidation amount) of Series 2013A 5.60% Preference Stock.
In January 2017, the Company issued 1,750,000 shares of common stock to Southern Company and realized proceeds of $175 million. The proceeds were used for general corporate purposes, including the Company's continuous construction program.
Dividend Restrictions
The Company can only pay dividends to Southern Company out of retained earnings or paid-in-capital.
Assets Subject to Lien
The Company has granted a lien on its property at Plant Daniel in connection with the issuance of two series of pollution control revenue bonds with an aggregate outstanding principal amount of $41 million as of December 31, 2017. There are no agreements or other arrangements among the Southern Company system companies under which the assets of one company have been pledged or otherwise made available to satisfy obligations of Southern Company or any of its subsidiaries.
Bank Credit Arrangements
At December 31, 2017, committed credit arrangements with banks were as follows:
Expires     
Executable
Term Loans
 Expires Within One Year
2018 2019 2020 Total Unused 
One
Year
 
Two
Years
 Term Out No Term Out
(in millions) (in millions) (in millions) (in millions)
$30
 $25
 $225
 $280
 $280
 $45
 $
 $20
 $10
In November 2017, the Company amended $195 million of its multi-year credit arrangements to extend the maturity dates from 2017 and 2018 to 2020.
Most of the bank credit arrangements require payment of commitment fees based on the unused portion of the commitments. Commitment fees average less than 1/4 of 1% for the Company.
Subject to applicable market conditions, the Company expects to renew or replace its bank credit arrangements as needed, prior to expiration. In connection therewith, the Company may extend the maturity dates and/or increase or decrease the lending commitments thereunder.
Most of these bank credit arrangements contain covenants that limit the Company's debt level to 65% of total capitalization, as defined in the arrangements. For purposes of these definitions, debt excludes certain hybrid securities. At December 31, 2017, the Company was in compliance with these covenants.
Most of the $280 million of unused credit arrangements with banks provide liquidity support to the Company's pollution control revenue bonds and commercial paper program. The amount of variable rate pollution control revenue bonds outstanding requiring liquidity support as of December 31, 2017 was approximately $82 million. In addition, at December 31, 2017, the Company had $75 million of fixed rate pollution control revenue bonds outstanding that were required to be remarketed within the next 12 months.
For short-term cash needs, the Company borrows primarily through a commercial paper program that has the liquidity support of the Company's committed bank credit arrangements described above. The Company may also borrow through various other arrangements with banks. Commercial paper and short-term bank loans are included in notes payable on the balance sheets.

NOTES (continued)
Gulf Power Company 2017 Annual Report

Details of short-term borrowings were as follows:
 
Short-term Debt at the
End of the Period
 Amount Outstanding Weighted Average Interest Rate
 (in millions)  
December 31, 2017:   
  Commercial paper$45
 2.0%
December 31, 2016:   
  Commercial paper$168
 1.1%
Short-term bank debt100
 1.5%
Total$268
 1.2%
7. COMMITMENTS
Fuel and Purchased Power Agreements
To supply a portion of the fuel requirements of its generating plants, the Company has entered into various long-term commitments for the procurement and delivery of fossil fuel which are not recognized on the balance sheets. In 2017, 2016, and 2015, the Company incurred fuel expense of $427 million, $432 million, and $445 million, respectively, the majority of which was purchased under long-term commitments. The Company expects that a substantial amount of its future fuel needs will continue to be purchased under long-term commitments.
In addition, the Company has entered into various long-term commitments for the purchase of capacity, energy, and transmission, some of which are accounted for as operating leases. The energy-related costs associated with PPAs are recovered through the fuel cost recovery clause. The capacity and transmission-related costs associated with PPAs are recovered through the purchased power capacity cost recovery clause. Capacity expense under a PPA accounted for as an operating lease was $75 million each year for 2017, 2016, and 2015.
Estimated total minimum long-term commitments at December 31, 2017 were as follows:
 Operating Lease PPA
 (in millions)
2018$79
201979
202079
202179
202279
2023 and thereafter33
Total$428
SCS may enter into various types of wholesale energy and natural gas contracts acting as an agent for the Company and all of the other traditional electric operating companies and Southern Power. Under these agreements, each of the traditional electric operating companies and Southern Power may be jointly and severally liable. Accordingly, Southern Company has entered into keep-well agreements with the Company and each of the other traditional electric operating companies to ensure the Company will not subsidize or be responsible for any costs, losses, liabilities, or damages resulting from the inclusion of Southern Power as a contracting party under these agreements.
Operating Leases
In addition to the operating lease PPA discussed above, the Company has entered into operating leases with Southern Linc and other third parties for the use of cellular tower space. These agreements have initial terms ranging from five to 10 years and renewal options of up to five years. The Company also has other operating lease agreements with various terms and expiration dates. Total lease payments were $10 million, $9 million, and $14 million for 2017, 2016, and 2015, respectively. The Company includes any step rents, fixed escalations, and reasonably assured renewal periods in its computation of minimum lease payments.

NOTES (continued)
Gulf Power Company 2017 Annual Report

Estimated total minimum lease payments under these operating leases at December 31, 2017 were as follows:
 Minimum Lease Payments
 
Affiliate Operating Leases(a)
 
Non-Affiliate Operating Leases(b)
 Total
 (in millions)
2018$2
 $7
 $9
20191
 1
 2
20201
 1
 2
20211
 
 1
20221
 
 1
2023 and thereafter4
 1
 5
Total$10
 $10
 $20
(a)Includes operating leases for cellular tower space.
(b)Includes operating leases for barges, facilities, and other equipment.
The Company also has operating lease agreements for railcars, barges, and towboats for the transport of coal. The Company has the option to renew the leases at the end of the lease term. The Company's lease costs, charged to fuel inventory and recovered through the retail fuel cost recovery clause, were $7 million in 2017, $5 million in 2016, and $10 million in 2015. The Company's annual barge and towboat payments for 2018 are expected to be approximately $6 million.
8. STOCK COMPENSATION
Stock-Based Compensation
Stock-based compensation primarily in the form of Southern Company performance share units and restricted stock units may be granted through the Omnibus Incentive Compensation Plan to a large segment of the Company's employees ranging from line management to executives. In 2015 and 2016, stock-based compensation consisted exclusively of performance share units. Beginning in 2017, stock-based compensation granted to employees includes restricted stock units in addition to performance share units. Prior to 2015, stock-based compensation also included stock options. As of December 31, 2017, there were 168 current and former employees participating in the stock option, performance share unit, and restricted stock unit programs.
Performance Share Units
Performance share units granted to employees vest at the end of a three-year performance period. All unvested performance share units vest immediately upon a change in control where Southern Company is not the surviving corporation. Shares of Southern Company common stock are delivered to employees at the end of the performance period with the number of shares issued ranging from 0% to 200% of the target number of performance share units granted, based on achievement of the performance goals established by the Compensation Committee of the Southern Company Board of Directors.
Southern Company issues performance share units with performance goals based on three performance goals to employees. These include performance share units with performance goals based on the total shareholder return (TSR) for Southern Company common stock during the three-year performance period as compared to a group of industry peers, performance share units with performance goals based on Southern Company's cumulative earnings per share (EPS) over the performance period, and performance share units with performance goals based on Southern Company's equity-weighted ROE over the performance period.
In 2015 and 2016, the EPS-based and ROE-based awards each represented 25% of the total target grant date fair value of the performance share unit awards granted. The remaining 50% of the total target grant date fair value consisted of TSR-based awards. Beginning in 2017, the total target grant date fair value of the stock compensation awards granted was comprised 20% each of EPS-based awards and ROE-based awards and 30% each of TSR-based awards and restricted stock units.
The fair value of TSR-based performance share unit awards is determined as of the grant date using a Monte Carlo simulation model to estimate the TSR of Southern Company's common stock among the industry peers over the performance period. The Company recognizes compensation expense on a straight-line basis over the three-year performance period without remeasurement.

NOTES (continued)
Gulf Power Company 2017 Annual Report

The fair values of the EPS-based awards and the ROE-based awards are based on the closing stock price of Southern Company common stock on the date of the grant. Compensation expense for the EPS-based and ROE-based awards is generally recognized ratably over the three-year performance period initially assuming a 100% payout at the end of the performance period. Employees become immediately vested in the TSR-based performance share units, along with the EPS-based and ROE-based awards, upon retirement. As a result, compensation expense for employees that are retirement eligible at the grant date is recognized immediately while compensation expense for employees that become retirement eligible during the vesting period is recognized over the period from grant date to the date of retirement eligibility. The expected payout related to the EPS-based and ROE-based awards is reevaluated annually with expense recognized to date increased or decreased based on the number of shares currently expected to be issued. Unlike the TSR-based awards, the compensation expense ultimately recognized for the EPS-based awards and the ROE-based awards will be based on the actual number of shares issued at the end of the performance period.
For the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016, and 2015, employees of the Company were granted performance share units of 28,423, 57,333, and 48,962, respectively. The weighted average grant-date fair value of TSR-based performance share units granted during 2017, 2016, and 2015, determined using a Monte Carlo simulation model to estimate the TSR of Southern Company's stock among the industry peers over the performance period, was $47.30, $45.18, and $46.38, respectively. The weighted average grant-date fair value of both EPS-based and ROE-based performance share units granted during 2017, 2016, and 2015 was $49.18, $48.83, and $47.75, respectively.
For the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016, and 2015, total compensation cost for performance share units recognized in income and the related tax benefit also recognized in income was immaterial. The compensation cost related to the grant of Southern Company performance share units to the Company's employees is recognized in the Company's financial statements with a corresponding credit to equity, representing a capital contribution from Southern Company. As of December 31, 2017, total unrecognized compensation cost related to performance share award units was immaterial.
Restricted Stock Units
Beginning in 2017, stock-based compensation granted to employees included restricted stock units in addition to performance share units. One-third of the restricted stock units granted to employees vest each year throughout a three-year service period. All unvested restricted stock units vest immediately upon a change in control where Southern Company is not the surviving corporation. Shares of Southern Company common stock are delivered to employees at the end of the vesting period.
The fair value of restricted stock units is based on the closing stock price of Southern Company common stock on the date of the grant. Since one-third of the restricted stock units vest each year throughout a three-year service period, compensation expense for restricted stock unit awards is generally recognized over the corresponding one-, two-, or three-year period. Employees become immediately vested in the restricted stock units upon retirement. As a result, compensation expense for employees that are retirement eligible at the grant date is recognized immediately while compensation expense for employees that become retirement eligible during the vesting period is recognized over the period from grant date to the date of retirement eligibility.
For the year ended December 31, 2017, employees of the Company were granted 15,736 restricted stock units. The weighted average grant-date fair value of restricted stock units granted during 2017 was $48.88.
For the year ended December 31, 2017, total compensation cost and the related tax benefit for restricted stock units recognized in income was immaterial. As of December 31, 2017, total unrecognized compensation cost related to restricted stock units was immaterial.
Stock Options
In 2015, Southern Company discontinued the granting of stock options. Stock options expire no later than 10 years after the grant date and the latest possible exercise will occur no later than November 2024.
The compensation cost related to the grant of Southern Company stock options to the Company's employees is recognized in the Company's financial statements with a corresponding credit to equity, representing a capital contribution from Southern Company. Compensation cost and related tax benefits recognized in the Company's financial statements were not material for any year presented. As of December 31, 2017, all compensation cost related to stock option awards has been recognized.
The total intrinsic value of options exercised during the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016, and 2015 was $2 million, $3 million, and $2 million, respectively. No cash proceeds are received by the Company upon the exercise of stock options. The actual tax benefit realized by the Company for the tax deductions from stock option exercises were immaterial for all years presented. Prior to the adoption of ASU 2016-09 in 2016, the excess tax benefits related to the exercise of stock options were recognized in the Company's financial statements with a credit to equity. Upon the adoption of ASU 2016-09, beginning in 2016,

NOTES (continued)
Gulf Power Company 2017 Annual Report

all tax benefits related to the exercise of stock options are recognized in income. As of December 31, 2017, the aggregate intrinsic value for the options outstanding and exercisable was $3 million.
9. FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTS
Fair value measurements are based on inputs of observable and unobservable market data that a market participant would use in pricing the asset or liability. The use of observable inputs is maximized where available and the use of unobservable inputs is minimized for fair value measurement and reflects a three-tier fair value hierarchy that prioritizes inputs to valuation techniques used for fair value measurement.
Level 1 consists of observable market data in an active market for identical assets or liabilities.
Level 2 consists of observable market data, other than that included in Level 1, that is either directly or indirectly observable.
Level 3 consists of unobservable market data. The input may reflect the assumptions of the Company of what a market participant would use in pricing an asset or liability. If there is little available market data, then the Company's own assumptions are the best available information.
In the case of multiple inputs being used in a fair value measurement, the lowest level input that is significant to the fair value measurement represents the level in the fair value hierarchy in which the fair value measurement is reported.
As of December 31, 2017, assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis during the period, together with their associated level of the fair value hierarchy, were as follows:
 Fair Value Measurements Using  
 Quoted Prices in Active Markets for Identical Assets Significant Other Observable Inputs Significant Unobservable Inputs  
As of December 31, 2017:(Level 1) (Level 2) (Level 3) Total
 (in millions)
Assets:       
Cash equivalents$21
 $
 $
 $21
Liabilities:       
Energy-related derivatives$
 $21
 $
 $21
As of December 31, 2016, assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis during the period, together with their associated level of the fair value hierarchy, were as follows:
 Fair Value Measurements Using  
 Quoted Prices in Active Markets for Identical Assets 
Significant
Other
Observable
Inputs
 
Significant
Unobservable
Inputs
  
As of December 31, 2016:(Level 1) (Level 2) (Level 3) Total
 (in millions)
Assets:       
Energy-related derivatives$
 $5
 $
 $5
Cash equivalents20
 
 
 20
Total$20
 $5
 $
 $25
Liabilities:       
Energy-related derivatives$
 $29
 $
 $29
Valuation Methodologies
The energy-related derivatives primarily consist of over-the-counter financial products for natural gas and physical power products, including, from time to time, basis swaps. These are standard products used within the energy industry and are valued using the market approach. The inputs used are mainly from observable market sources, such as forward natural gas prices, power prices, implied volatility, and overnight index swap interest rates. Interest rate derivatives are also standard over-the-counter

NOTES (continued)
Gulf Power Company 2017 Annual Report

products that are valued using observable market data and assumptions commonly used by market participants. The fair value of interest rate derivatives reflect the net present value of expected payments and receipts under the swap agreement based on the market's expectation of future interest rates. Additional inputs to the net present value calculation may include the contract terms, counterparty credit risk, and occasionally, implied volatility of interest rate options. The interest rate derivatives are categorized as Level 2 under Fair Value Measurements as these inputs are based on observable data and valuations of similar instruments. See Note 10 for additional information on how these derivatives are used.
As of December 31, 2017 and 2016, other financial instruments for which the carrying amount did not equal fair value were as follows:
 
Carrying
Amount
 
Fair
Value
 (in millions)
Long-term debt:   
2017$1,285
 $1,334
2016$1,074
 $1,097
The fair values are determined using Level 2 measurements and are based on quoted market prices for the same or similar issues or on the current rates available to the Company.
10. DERIVATIVES
The Company is exposed to market risks, primarily commodity price risk and interest rate risk. To manage the volatility attributable to these exposures, the Company nets its exposures, where possible, to take advantage of natural offsets and may enter into various derivative transactions for the remaining exposures pursuant to the Company's policies in areas such as counterparty exposure and risk management practices. The Company's policy is that derivatives are to be used primarily for hedging purposes and mandates strict adherence to all applicable risk management policies. Derivative positions are monitored using techniques including, but not limited to, market valuation, value at risk, stress testing, and sensitivity analysis. Derivative instruments are recognized at fair value in the balance sheets as either assets or liabilities and are presented on a net basis. See Note 9 for additional information. In the statements of cash flows, the cash impacts of settled energy-related and interest rate derivatives are recorded as operating activities.
Energy-Related Derivatives
The Company enters into energy-related derivatives to hedge exposures to electricity, gas, and other fuel price changes. However, due to cost-based rate regulations and other various cost recovery mechanisms, the Company has limited exposure to market volatility in energy-related commodity prices. The Company manages fuel-hedging programs, implemented per the guidelines of the Florida PSC, through the use of financial derivative contracts, which is expected to continue to mitigate price volatility. The Florida PSC approved a stipulation and agreement that prospectively imposed a moratorium on the Company's fuel-hedging program in October 2016 through December 31, 2017. In connection with the 2017 Rate Case Settlement Agreement, the Florida PSC extended the moratorium on the Company's fuel-hedging program until January 1, 2021. The moratorium does not have an impact on the recovery of existing hedges entered into under the previously-approved hedging program.
Energy-related derivative contracts are accounted for under one of three methods:
Regulatory Hedges — Energy-related derivative contracts which are designated as regulatory hedges relate primarily to the Company's fuel-hedging programs, where gains and losses are initially recorded as regulatory liabilities and assets, respectively, and then are included in fuel expense as the underlying fuel is used in operations and ultimately recovered through the fuel cost recovery clause.
Cash Flow Hedges — Gains and losses on energy-related derivatives designated as cash flow hedges (which are mainly used to hedge anticipated purchases and sales) are initially deferred in OCI before being recognized in the statements of income in the same period as the hedged transactions are reflected in earnings.
Not Designated — Gains and losses on energy-related derivative contracts that are not designated or fail to qualify as hedges are recognized in the statements of income as incurred.
Some energy-related derivative contracts require physical delivery as opposed to financial settlement, and this type of derivative is both common and prevalent within the electric industry. When an energy-related derivative contract is settled physically, any cumulative unrealized gain or loss is reversed and the contract price is recognized in the respective line item representing the actual price of the underlying goods being delivered.

NOTES (continued)
Gulf Power Company 2017 Annual Report

At December 31, 2017, the net volume of energy-related derivative contracts for natural gas positions totaled 22 million mmBtu for the Company, with the longest hedge date of 2020 over which it is hedging its exposure to the variability in future cash flows for forecasted transactions.
In addition to the volume discussed above, the Company enters into physical natural gas supply contracts that provide the option to sell back excess gas due to operational constraints. The maximum expected volume of natural gas subject to such a feature is 3 million mmBtu for the Company.
Interest Rate Derivatives
The Company may also enter into interest rate derivatives to hedge exposure to changes in interest rates. Derivatives related to existing variable rate securities or forecasted transactions are accounted for as cash flow hedges where the effective portion of the derivatives' fair value gains or losses is recorded in OCI and is reclassified into earnings at the same time the hedged transactions affect earnings. The derivatives employed as hedging instruments are structured to minimize ineffectiveness, which is recorded directly to earnings.
At December 31, 2017, there were no interest rate derivatives outstanding.
The estimated pre-tax losses related to interest rate derivatives that will be reclassified from accumulated OCI to interest expense for the 12-month period ending December 31, 2018 are immaterial. The Company has deferred gains and losses that are expected to be amortized into earnings through 2026.
Derivative Financial Statement Presentation and Amounts
The Company enters into energy-related and interest rate derivative contracts that may contain certain provisions that permit intra-contract netting of derivative receivables and payables for routine billing and offsets related to events of default and settlements. Fair value amounts of derivative assets and liabilities on the balance sheets are presented net to the extent that there are netting arrangements or similar agreements with the counterparties.
At December 31, 2017 and 2016, the fair value of energy-related derivatives was reflected on the balance sheets as follows:
 20172016
Derivative Category and Balance Sheet LocationAssetsLiabilitiesAssetsLiabilities
 (in millions)
Derivatives designated as hedging instruments for regulatory purposes    
Energy-related derivatives:    
Other current assets/Other current liabilities$
$14
$4
$12
Other deferred charges and assets/Other deferred credits and liabilities
7
1
17
Total derivatives designated as hedging instruments for regulatory purposes$
$21
$5
$29
Gross amounts recognized$
$21
$5
$29
Gross amounts offset$
$
$(4)$(4)
Net amounts recognized on the Balance Sheets$
$21
$1
$25
Energy-related derivatives not designated as hedging instruments were immaterial on the balance sheets for 2017 and 2016.

NOTES (continued)
Gulf Power Company 2017 Annual Report

At December 31, 2017 and 2016, the pre-tax effects of unrealized derivative gains (losses) arising from energy-related derivatives designated as regulatory hedging instruments and deferred were as follows:
 Unrealized Losses Unrealized Gains
Derivative Category
Balance Sheet
Location
2017 2016 
Balance Sheet
Location
2017 2016
  (in millions)  (in millions)
Energy-related derivatives:(*)
Other regulatory assets, current$(14) $(9) Other regulatory liabilities, current$
 $1
 Other regulatory assets, deferred(7) (16) Other regulatory liabilities, deferred
 
Total energy-related derivative gains (losses) $(21) $(25)  $
 $1
(*)The unrealized gains and losses for derivative contracts subject to netting arrangements were presented net on the balance sheets.
For the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016, and 2015, the pre-tax effects of energy-related derivatives and interest rate derivatives designated as cash flow hedging instruments on the statements of income were immaterial and there was no material ineffectiveness recorded in earnings for any period presented.
For the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016, and 2015, the pre-tax effects of energy-related derivatives not designated as hedging instruments on the statements of income were not material.
Contingent Features
The Company does not have any credit arrangements that would require material changes in payment schedules or terminations as a result of a credit rating downgrade. There are certain derivatives that could require collateral, but not accelerated payment, in the event of various credit rating changes of certain affiliated companies. At December 31, 2017, the Company had no collateral posted with its derivative counterparties to satisfy these arrangements.
At December 31, 2017, the fair value of derivative liabilities with contingent features was immaterial. However, because of joint and several liability features underlying these derivatives, the maximum potential collateral requirements arising from the credit-risk related contingent features, at a rating below BBB- and /or Baa3, were $12 million, and include certain agreements that could require collateral in the event that one or more Southern Company system power pool participants has a credit rating change to below investment grade.
Generally, collateral may be provided by a Southern Company guaranty, letter of credit, or cash. If collateral is required, fair value amounts recognized for the right to reclaim cash collateral or the obligation to return cash collateral are not offset against fair value amounts recognized for derivatives executed with the same counterparty.
The Company is exposed to losses related to financial instruments in the event of counterparties' nonperformance. The Company only enters into agreements and material transactions with counterparties that have investment grade credit ratings by Moody's and S&P or with counterparties who have posted collateral to cover potential credit exposure. The Company has also established risk management policies and controls to determine and monitor the creditworthiness of counterparties in order to mitigate the Company's exposure to counterparty credit risk. Therefore, the Company does not anticipate a material adverse effect on the financial statements as a result of counterparty nonperformance.

NOTES (continued)
Gulf Power Company 2017 Annual Report

11. QUARTERLY FINANCIAL INFORMATION (UNAUDITED)
Summarized quarterly financial information for 2017 and 2016 is as follows:
Quarter Ended
Operating
Revenues
 
Operating
Income
 Net Income After Dividends on Preference Stock
 (in millions)
March 2017$350
 $46
 $18
June 2017357
 75
 35
September 2017437
 115
 63
December 2017372
 53
 19
      
March 2016$335
 $65
 $29
June 2016365
 74
 34
September 2016436
 90
 45
December 2016349
 54
 23
The Company's business is influenced by seasonal weather conditions.

SELECTED FINANCIAL AND OPERATING DATA 2013-2017
Gulf Power Company 2017 Annual Report

 2017
 2016
 2015
 2014
 2013
Operating Revenues (in millions)$1,516
 $1,485
 $1,483
 $1,590
 $1,440
Net Income After Dividends
on Preference Stock (in millions)
$135
 $131
 $148
 $140
 $124
Cash Dividends
on Common Stock (in millions)
$165
 $120
 $130
 $123
 $115
Return on Average Common Equity (percent)9.22
 9.52
 11.11
 11.02
 10.30
Total Assets (in millions)(a)(b)
$4,797
 $4,822
 $4,920
 $4,697
 $4,321
Gross Property Additions (in millions)$201
 $179
 $247
 $361
 $305
Capitalization (in millions):         
Common stock equity$1,531
 $1,389
 $1,355
 $1,309
 $1,235
Preference stock
 147
 147
 147
 147
Long-term debt(a)
1,285
 987
 1,193
 1,362
 1,150
Total (excluding amounts due within one year)$2,816
 $2,523
 $2,695
 $2,818
 $2,532
Capitalization Ratios (percent):         
Common stock equity54.4
 55.1
 50.3
 46.5
 48.8
Preference stock
 5.8
 5.4
 5.2
 5.8
Long-term debt(a)
45.6
 39.1
 44.3
 48.3
 45.4
Total (excluding amounts due within one year)100.0
 100.0
 100.0
 100.0
 100.0
Customers (year-end):         
Residential404,273
 398,501
 393,149
 388,292
 383,980
Commercial56,700
 56,091
 55,460
 54,892
 54,567
Industrial255
 254
 248
 260
 260
Other578
 569
 614
 603
 582
Total461,806
 455,415
 449,471
 444,047
 439,389
Employees (year-end)1,288
 1,352
 1,391
 1,384
 1,410
(a)A reclassification of debt issuance costs from Total Assets to Long-term debt of $8 million and $8 million is reflected for years 2014 and 2013, respectively, in accordance with new accounting standards adopted in 2015 and applied retrospectively.
(b)A reclassification of deferred tax assets from Total Assets of $3 million and $8 million is reflected for years 2014 and 2013, respectively, in accordance with new accounting standards adopted in 2015 and applied retrospectively.


SELECTED FINANCIAL AND OPERATING DATA 2013-2017 (continued)
Gulf Power Company 2017 Annual Report

 2017
 2016
 2015
 2014
 2013
Operating Revenues (in millions):         
Residential$720
 $714
 $698
 $700
 $632
Commercial412
 410
 403
 408
 395
Industrial144
 152
 144
 153
 139
Other5
 5
 4
 6
 4
Total retail1,281
 1,281
 1,249
 1,267
 1,170
Wholesale — non-affiliates57
 61
 107
 129
 109
Wholesale — affiliates108
 75
 58
 130
 100
Total revenues from sales of electricity1,446
 1,417
 1,414
 1,526
 1,379
Other revenues70
 68
 69
 64
 61
Total$1,516
 $1,485
 $1,483
 $1,590
 $1,440
Kilowatt-Hour Sales (in millions):         
Residential5,229
 5,358
 5,365
 5,362
 5,089
Commercial3,814
 3,869
 3,898
 3,838
 3,810
Industrial1,740
 1,830
 1,798
 1,849
 1,700
Other26
 25
 25
 26
 21
Total retail10,809
 11,082
 11,086
 11,075
 10,620
Wholesale — non-affiliates749
 751
 1,040
 1,670
 1,163
Wholesale — affiliates3,887
 2,784
 1,906
 3,284
 3,127
Total15,445
 14,617
 14,032
 16,029
 14,910
Average Revenue Per Kilowatt-Hour (cents):         
Residential13.77
 13.33
 13.01
 13.06
 12.43
Commercial10.80
 10.60
 10.34
 10.64
 10.37
Industrial8.28
 8.31
 8.01
 8.28
 8.15
Total retail11.85
 11.56
 11.27
 11.44
 11.02
Wholesale3.56
 3.85
 5.60
 5.23
 4.87
Total sales9.36
 9.69
 10.08
 9.52
 9.25
Residential Average Annual         
Kilowatt-Hour Use Per Customer13,015
 13,515
 13,705
 13,865
 13,301
Residential Average Annual         
Revenue Per Customer$1,792
 $1,801
 $1,783
 $1,811
 $1,653
Plant Nameplate Capacity         
Ratings (year-end) (megawatts)2,278
 2,278
 2,583
 2,663
 2,663
Maximum Peak-Hour Demand (megawatts):         
Winter2,202
 2,033
 2,488
 2,684
 1,729
Summer2,422
 2,503
 2,491
 2,424
 2,356
Annual Load Factor (percent)55.2
 54.7
 54.9
 51.1
 55.9
Plant Availability Fossil-Steam (percent)79.3
 81.0
 88.3
 89.4
 92.8
Source of Energy Supply (percent):         
Coal33.1
 31.0
 33.5
 44.5
 36.4
Gas27.8
 23.2
 25.6
 22.2
 23.0
Purchased power —         
From non-affiliates35.6
 41.1
 30.4
 28.9
 37.0
From affiliates3.5
 4.7
 10.5
 4.4
 3.6
Total100.0
 100.0
 100.0
 100.0
 100.0

MISSISSIPPI POWER COMPANY
FINANCIAL SECTION
 
    Table of Contents                                Index to Financial Statements

MANAGEMENT'S REPORT ON INTERNAL CONTROL OVER FINANCIAL REPORTING
Mississippi Power Company 2017 Annual Report
The management of Mississippi Power Company (the Company) is responsible for establishing and maintaining an adequate system of internal control over financial reporting as required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and as defined in Exchange Act Rule 13a-15(f). A control system can provide only reasonable, not absolute, assurance that the objectives of the control system are met.
Under management's supervision, an evaluation of the design and effectiveness of the Company's internal control over financial reporting was conducted based on the framework in Internal Control—Integrated Framework (2013) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission. Based on this evaluation, management concluded that the Company's internal control over financial reporting was effective as of December 31, 2017.

/s/ Anthony L. Wilson
Anthony L. Wilson
Chairman, President, and Chief Executive Officer

/s/ Moses H. Feagin
Moses H. Feagin
Vice President, Chief Financial Officer, and Treasurer
February 20, 2018


REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
To the stockholdersstockholder and the Board of Directors of Mississippi Power Company
Opinion on the Financial Statements
We have audited the accompanying balance sheets and statements of capitalization of Mississippi Power Company (the Company)(Mississippi Power) (a wholly-owned subsidiary of The Southern Company) as of December 31, 20172018 and 2016,2017, the related statements of operations, comprehensive income (loss), common stockholder's equity, and cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2017,2018, and the related notes (collectively referred to as the "financial statements"). In our opinion, the financial statements (pages II-431 to II-477) present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of the CompanyMississippi Power as of December 31, 20172018 and 2016,2017, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2017,2018, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.
Basis for Opinion
These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company'sMississippi Power's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Company'sMississippi Power's financial statements based on our audits. We are a public accounting firm registered with the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (PCAOB) and are required to be independent with respect to the CompanyMississippi Power in accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.
We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement, whether due to error or fraud. The CompanyMississippi Power is not required to have, nor were we engaged to perform, an audit of its internal control over financial reporting. As part of our audits, we are required to obtain an understanding of internal control over financial reporting but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Company'sMississippi Power's internal control over financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion.
Our audits included performing procedures to assess the risks of material misstatement of the financial statements, whether due to error or fraud, and performing procedures that respond to those risks. Such procedures included examining, on a test basis, evidence regarding the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. Our audits also included evaluating the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the financial statements. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
/s/ Deloitte & Touche LLP
Atlanta, Georgia
February 20, 201819, 2019
We have served as the Company'sMississippi Power's auditor since 2002.

    Table of Contents                                Index to Financial Statements

DEFINITIONS
TermMeaning
2012 MPSC CPCN OrderA detailed order issued by the Mississippi PSC in April 2012 confirming the CPCN originally approved by the Mississippi PSC in 2010 authorizing acquisition, construction, and operation of the Kemper County energy facility
AFUDCAllowance for funds used during construction
Alabama PowerAlabama Power Company
AROAsset retirement obligation
ASCAccounting Standards Codification
ASUAccounting Standards Update
CCRCoal combustion residuals
Clean Air ActClean Air Act Amendments of 1990
CO2
Carbon dioxide
Cooperative EnergyElectric cooperative in Mississippi
CPCNCertificate of public convenience and necessity
CWIPConstruction work in progress
DOEU.S. Department of Energy
ECMEnergy cost management clause
ECOEnvironmental compliance overview
EPAU.S. Environmental Protection Agency
FASBFinancial Accounting Standards Board
FERCFederal Energy Regulatory Commission
GAAPU.S. generally accepted accounting principles
Georgia PowerGeorgia Power Company
Gulf PowerGulf Power Company
IGCCIntegrated coal gasification combined cycle, the technology originally approved for Mississippi Power's Kemper County energy facility (Plant Ratcliffe)
IRSInternal Revenue Service
ITCInvestment tax credit
KWHKilowatt-hour
LIBORLondon Interbank Offered Rate
Mirror CWIPA regulatory liability used by Mississippi Power to record financing costs associated with construction of the Kemper County energy facility, which were subsequently refunded to customers
mmBtuMillion British thermal units
Moody'sMoody's Investors Service, Inc.
MPUSMississippi Public Utilities Staff
MRAMunicipal and Rural Associations
MWMegawatt
NOX
Nitrogen oxide
OCIOther comprehensive income
PEPPerformance evaluation plan
power poolThe operating arrangement whereby the integrated generating resources of the traditional electric operating companies and Southern Power (excluding subsidiaries) are subject to joint commitment and dispatch in order to serve their combined load obligations

DEFINITIONS
(continued)

TermMeaning
PPAPower purchase agreement
PSCPublic Service Commission
ROEReturn on equity
S&PS&P Global Ratings, a division of S&P Global Inc.
scrubberFlue gas desulfurization system
SCSSouthern Company Services, Inc. (the Southern Company system service company)
SECU.S. Securities and Exchange Commission
SO2
Sulfur dioxide
Southern CompanyThe Southern Company
Southern Company GasSouthern Company Gas and its subsidiaries
Southern Company systemSouthern Company, the traditional electric operating companies, Southern Power, Southern Company Gas (as of July 1, 2016), Southern Electric Generating Company, Southern Nuclear, SCS, Southern Linc, PowerSecure, Inc. (as of May 9, 2016), and other subsidiaries
Southern LincSouthern Communications Services, Inc.
Southern NuclearSouthern Nuclear Operating Company, Inc.
Southern PowerSouthern Power Company and its subsidiaries
SRRSystem Restoration Rider, a tariff for retail property damage reserve
Tax Reform LegislationThe Tax Cuts and Jobs Act, which was signed into law on December 22, 2017 and became effective on January 1, 2018
traditional electric operating companiesAlabama Power, Georgia Power, Gulf Power, and Mississippi Power

MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
Mississippi Power Company 2017 Annual Report
OVERVIEW
Business Activities
Mississippi Power Company (the Company) operates as a vertically integrated utility providing electric service to retail customers within its traditional service territory located within the State of Mississippi and to wholesale customers in the Southeast.
Many factors affect the opportunities, challenges, and risks of the Company's business of providing electric service. These factors include the Company's ability to maintain and grow energy sales and to operate in a constructive regulatory environment that provides timely recovery of prudently-incurred costs. These costs include those related to reliability, fuel, and stringent environmental standards, as well as ongoing capital and operations and maintenance expenditures and restoration following major storms. Appropriately balancing required costs and capital expenditures with customer prices will continue to challenge the Company for the foreseeable future.
The Kemper County energy facility was approved by the Mississippi PSC as an IGCC facility in the 2010 CPCN proceedings, subject to a construction cost cap of $2.88 billion, net of $245 million of grants awarded to the project by the DOE under the Clean Coal Power Initiative Round 2 (Initial DOE Grants) and excluding the cost of the lignite mine and equipment, the cost of the CO2 pipeline facilities, AFUDC, and certain general exceptions (Cost Cap Exceptions). The combined cycle and associated common facilities portions of the Kemper County energy facility were placed in service in August 2014. In December 2015, the Mississippi PSC issued an order (In-Service Asset Rate Order), authorizing rates that provided for the recovery of approximately $126 million annually related to the assets previously placed in service.
On June 21, 2017, the Mississippi PSC stated its intent to issue an order (which occurred on July 6, 2017) directing the Company to pursue a settlement under which the Kemper County energy facility would be operated as a natural gas plant, rather than an IGCC plant, and address all issues associated with the Kemper County energy facility (Kemper Settlement Order). The Kemper Settlement Order established a new docket for the purposes of pursuing a global settlement of the related costs (Kemper Settlement Docket).
On June 28, 2017, the Company notified the Mississippi PSC that it would begin a process to suspend operations and start-up activities on the gasifier portion of the Kemper County energy facility, given the uncertainty as to its future. At the time of project suspension, the total cost estimate for the Kemper County energy facility was approximately $7.38 billion, including approximately $5.95 billion of costs subject to the construction cost cap, and was net of the $137 million in additional grants from the DOE received on April 8, 2016 (Additional DOE Grants). In the aggregate, the Company had incurred charges of $3.07 billion ($1.89 billion after tax) as a result of changes in the cost estimate above the cost cap for the Kemper IGCC through May 31, 2017. Given the Mississippi PSC's stated intent regarding no further rate increase for the Kemper County energy facility and the subsequent suspension, cost recovery of the gasifier portions became no longer probable; therefore, the Company recorded an additional charge to income in June 2017 of $2.8 billion ($2.0 billion after tax), which included estimated costs associated with the gasifier portions of the plant and lignite mine.
On February 6, 2018, the Mississippi PSC voted to approve a settlement agreement related to cost recovery for the Kemper County energy facility among the Company, the MPUS, and certain intervenors (Kemper Settlement Agreement). The Kemper Settlement Agreement provides for an annual revenue requirement of approximately $99.3 million for costs related to the Kemper County energy facility, which includes the impact of Tax Reform Legislation. The revenue requirement is based on (i) a fixed ROE for 2018 of 8.6%, excluding any performance adjustment, (ii) a ROE for 2019 calculated in accordance with PEP, excluding the performance adjustment, (iii) for future years, a performance-based ROE calculated pursuant to PEP, and (iv) amortization periods for the related regulatory assets and liabilities of eight years and six years, respectively. The revenue requirement also reflects a disallowance related to a portion of the Company's investment in the Kemper County energy facility requested for inclusion in rate base, which was recorded in the fourth quarter 2017 as an additional charge to income of approximately $78 million ($85 million net of accumulated depreciation of $7 million) pre-tax ($48 million after tax).
Under the Kemper Settlement Agreement, retail customer rates will reflect a reduction of approximately $26.8 million annually and include no recovery for costs associated with the gasifier portion of the Kemper County energy facility in 2018 or at any future date. On February 12, 2018, the Company made the required compliance filing with the Mississippi PSC. The Kemper Settlement Agreement also requires (i) the CPCN for the Kemper County energy facility to be modified to limit it to natural gas combined cycle operation and (ii) the Company to file a reserve margin plan with the Mississippi PSC by August 2018.
During the third and fourth quarters of 2017, the Company recorded charges to income of $242 million ($206 million after tax), including $164 million for ongoing project costs, estimated mine and gasifier-related costs, and certain termination costs during

MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS (continued)
Mississippi Power Company 2017 Annual Report

the suspension period prior to conclusion of the Kemper Settlement Docket, as well as the charge associated with the Kemper Settlement Agreement. Additional pre-tax cancellation costs, including mine and plant closure and contract termination costs, currently estimated at approximately $50 million to $100 million (excluding salvage), are expected to be incurred in 2018. The Company has begun efforts to dispose of or abandon the mine and gasifier-related assets.
Total pre-tax charges to income related to the Kemper County energy facility were $3.4 billion ($2.4 billion after tax) for the year ended December 31, 2017. In the aggregate, since the Kemper County energy facility project started, the Company has incurred charges of $6.2 billion ($4.1 billion after tax) through December 31, 2017.
As a result of the Mississippi PSC order on February 6, 2018, rate recovery for the Kemper County energy facility is resolved, subject to any future legal challenges.
For additional information, see FUTURE EARNINGS POTENTIAL – "Kemper County Energy Facility" and "Other Matters" herein.
The Company's financial statement presentation contemplates continuation of the Company as a going concern as a result of Southern Company's anticipated ongoing financial support of the Company. For additional information, see Note 6 to the financial statements under "Going Concern." In June 2017, Southern Company made equity contributions totaling $1.0 billion to the Company. The Company used a portion of the proceeds to (i) prepay $300 million of the outstanding principal amount under its $1.2 billion unsecured term loan; (ii) repay $591 million of the outstanding principal amount of promissory notes to Southern Company; and (iii) repay $10 million of the outstanding principal amount of bank loans.
As of December 31, 2017, the Company's current liabilities exceeded current assets by approximately $911 million primarily due to a $900 million unsecured term loan that matures on March 31, 2018. The Company expects to refinance the unsecured term loan with external security issuances and/or borrowings from financial institutions or Southern Company. To fund the Company's capital needs over the next 12 months, the Company intends to utilize operating cash flows, external security issuances, lines of credit, bank term loans, equity contributions from Southern Company, and, to the extent necessary, loans from Southern Company.
The Company continues to focus on several key performance indicators. In recognition that the Company's long-term financial success is dependent upon how well it satisfies its customers' needs, the Company's retail base rate mechanism, PEP, includes performance indicators that directly tie customer service indicators to the Company's allowed ROE. PEP measures the Company's performance on a 10-point scale as a weighted average of results in three areas: average customer price, as compared to prices of other regional utilities (weighted at 40%); service reliability, measured in percentage of time customers had electric service (40%); and customer satisfaction, measured in a survey of residential customers (20%). The Company also focuses on broader measures of customer satisfaction, plant availability, system reliability, and net income after dividends on preferred stock.
On January 16, 2018, the Mississippi PSC approved the 2018 retail fuel cost recovery factor, effective February 2018 through January 2019, which resulted in a $39 million increase in annual revenues. On February 7, 2018, the Company filed its 2018 PEP forecast, requesting an increase in annual base revenues of $26 million. On February 14, 2018, the Company submitted its 2018 ECO filing, requesting an increase in annual retail revenue of $17 million. The PEP and ECO filings include the effects of Tax Reform Legislation. Rulings from the Mississippi PSC on the PEP and ECO filings are expected in the first half of 2018. See FUTURE EARNINGS POTENTIAL – "Retail Regulatory Matters" herein and Note 3 to the financial statements under "Retail Regulatory Matters – Performance Evaluation Plan" for more information. The ultimate outcome of this matter cannot be determined at this time.
The Company's financial success is directly tied to customer satisfaction. Key elements of ensuring customer satisfaction include outstanding service, high reliability, and competitive prices. Management uses customer satisfaction surveys to evaluate the Company's results and generally targets top-quartile performance.
See RESULTS OF OPERATIONS herein for information on the Company's financial performance.
Earnings
The Company's net loss after dividends on preferred stock was $2.59 billion in 2017 compared to a $50 million net loss in 2016. The change in 2017 was primarily the result of higher pre-tax charges of $3.36 billion ($2.39 billion after tax) in 2017 compared to pre-tax charges of $428 million ($264 million after tax) in 2016 for estimated losses on the Kemper IGCC.
The Company's net loss after dividends on preferred stock was $50 million in 2016 compared to $8 million in 2015. The change in 2016 was primarily the result of higher pre-tax charges of $428 million ($264 million after tax) in 2016 compared to pre-tax charges of $365 million ($226 million after tax) in 2015 for estimated losses on the Kemper IGCC. The decrease in net income was partially offset by an increase in retail revenues due to the implementation of rates in September 2015 for certain Kemper

MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS (continued)
Mississippi Power Company 2017 Annual Report

County energy facility in-service assets, partially offset by a decrease in wholesale revenues. The increase in revenues was partially offset by an increase in interest expense in 2016 compared to 2015 due to the termination of an asset purchase agreement between the Company and Cooperative Energy in 2015 and an increase in operations and maintenance expenses.
See Note 3 to the financial statements under "Kemper County Energy Facility" for additional information.
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
A condensed statement of operations follows:
 Amount 
Increase (Decrease)
from Prior Year
 2017 2017 2016
 (in millions)
Operating revenues$1,187
 $24
 $25
Fuel395
 52
 (100)
Purchased power25
 (9) 22
Other operations and maintenance282
 (30) 38
Depreciation and amortization161
 29
 9
Taxes other than income taxes104
 (5) 15
Estimated loss on Kemper IGCC3,362
 2,934
 63
Total operating expenses4,329
 2,971
 47
Operating loss(3,142) (2,947) (22)
Allowance for equity funds used during construction72
 (52) 14
Interest expense, net of amounts capitalized42
 (32) 67
Other income (expense), net(8) (1) 1
Income taxes (benefit)(532) (428) (32)
Net income (loss)(2,588) (2,540) (42)
Dividends on preferred stock2
 
 
Net loss after dividends on preferred stock$(2,590) $(2,540) $(42)

MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS (continued)
Mississippi Power Company 2017 Annual Report

Operating Revenues
Operating revenues for 2017 were $1.2 billion, reflecting a $24 million increase from 2016. Details of operating revenues were as follows:
 Amount
 2017 2016
 (in millions)
Retail — prior year$859
 $776
Estimated change resulting from —   
Rates and pricing(7) 96
Sales growth (decline)4
 (4)
Weather(15) 8
Fuel and other cost recovery13
 (17)
Retail — current year854
 859
Wholesale revenues —   
Non-affiliates259
 261
Affiliates56
 26
Total wholesale revenues315
 287
Other operating revenues18
 17
Total operating revenues$1,187
 $1,163
Percent change2.1% 2.2%
Total retail revenues for 2017 decreased $5 million, or 0.6%, compared to 2016 primarily due to a $15 million decrease as a result of milder weather in 2017 and the deferral of $17 million of revenue following the complete amortization of certain regulatory assets related to the Kemper County energy facility in July 2017. These decreases were partially offset by a $10 million net increase related to ECO plan rate changes in the third quarter 2016 and the second quarter 2017 and an increase of $13 million in fuel cost recovery. Total retail revenues for 2016 increased $83 million, or 10.7%, compared to 2015 primarily due to changes in rates and pricing of $96 million, partially offset by a net decrease in fuel and other cost recovery of $17 million.
See Note 3 to the financial statements under "Retail Regulatory Matters – Environmental Compliance Overview" and "Kemper County Energy Facility – Rate Recovery" for additional information. See "Energy Sales" below for a discussion of changes in the volume of energy sold, including changes related to sales and weather.
Electric rates for the Company include provisions to adjust billings for fluctuations in fuel costs, including the energy component of purchased power costs. Under these provisions, fuel revenues generally equal fuel expenses, including the energy component of purchased power costs, and do not affect net income. Recoverable fuel costs include fuel and purchased power expenses reduced by the fuel and emissions portion of wholesale revenues from energy sold to customers outside the Company's service territory. See FUTURE EARNINGS POTENTIAL – "Retail Regulatory Matters – Fuel Cost Recovery" herein for additional information.
Wholesale revenues from power sales to non-affiliated utilities, including FERC-regulated MRA sales as well as market-based sales, were as follows:
 2017 2016 2015
 (in millions)
Capacity and other$154
 $157
 $158
Energy105
 104
 112
Total non-affiliated$259
 $261
 $270
Wholesale revenues from sales to non-affiliates will vary depending on fuel prices, the market prices of wholesale energy compared to the cost of the Company's and the Southern Company system's generation, demand for energy within the Southern Company system's electric service territory, and the availability of the Southern Company system's generation. Increases and decreases in energy revenues that are driven by fuel prices are accompanied by an increase or decrease in fuel costs and do not

MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS (continued)
Mississippi Power Company 2017 Annual Report

have a significant impact on net income. In addition, the Company provides service under long-term contracts with rural electric cooperative associations and municipalities located in southeastern Mississippi under cost-based electric tariffs which are subject to regulation by the FERC. The contracts with these wholesale customers represented 19.3% of the Company's total operating revenues in 2017 and are largely subject to rolling 10-year cancellation notices. Historically, these wholesale customers have acted as a group and any changes in contractual relationships for one customer are likely to be followed by the other wholesale customers.
Short-term opportunity energy sales are also included in sales for resale to non-affiliates. These opportunity sales are made at market-based rates that generally provide a margin above the Company's variable cost to produce the energy.
Wholesale revenues from sales to affiliates will vary depending on demand and the availability and cost of generating resources at each company. These affiliate sales are made in accordance with the Intercompany Interchange Contract (IIC), as approved by the FERC. These transactions do not have a significant impact on earnings since this energy is generally sold at marginal cost.
Wholesale revenues from sales to affiliates increased $30 million, or 115.4%, in 2017 compared to 2016. The increase was primarily due to higher natural gas prices and higher KWH sales due to dispatch of the Company's lower cost generation resources to serve system territorial load. Wholesale revenues from sales to affiliates decreased $50 million, or 65.8%, in 2016 compared to 2015 primarily due to a $50 million decrease in energy revenues of which $4 million was associated with lower fuel prices and $46 million was associated with a decrease in KWH sales as a result of lower cost generation available in the Southern Company system.
Energy Sales
Changes in revenues are influenced heavily by the change in the volume of energy sold from year to year. KWH sales for 2017 and the percent change from the prior year were as follows:
 
Total
KWHs
 
Total KWH
Percent Change
 Weather-Adjusted Percent Change
 2017 2017 2016 2017 2016
 (in millions)        
Residential1,944
 (5.2)% 1.3 % 1.4 % (2.4)%
Commercial2,764
 (2.7) 1.3
 (0.1) (2.2)
Industrial4,841
 (1.3) (1.0) (1.3) (1.6)
Other39
 (1.6) (1.3) (1.6) (1.3)
Total retail9,588
 (2.5) 0.1
 (0.4)% (1.9)%
Wholesale         
Non-affiliated3,672
 (6.3) 1.7
    
Affiliated2,024
 82.7
 (60.5)    
Total wholesale5,696
 14.0
 (24.5)    
Total energy sales15,284
 2.8 % (9.8)%    
Changes in retail energy sales are generally the result of changes in electricity usage by customers, changes in weather, and changes in the number of customers. Retail energy sales decreased 2.5% in 2017 as compared to the prior year. This decrease was primarily the result of milder weather in 2017 as compared to 2016. Weather-adjusted residential KWH sales increased in 2017 primarily due to increased customer usage. Weather-adjusted commercial KWH sales decreased primarily due to decreased customer usage largely offset by customer growth. The decrease in industrial KWH energy sales was primarily due to Hurricane Nate, which impacted several large industrial customers.
Retail energy sales increased 0.1% in 2016 as compared to the prior year. This increase was primarily the result of warmer weather in the third quarter 2016 as compared to the corresponding period in 2015. Weather-adjusted residential and commercial KWH sales decreased primarily due to decreased customer usage partially offset by customer growth. The decrease in industrial KWH energy sales was primarily due to planned and unplanned outages by large industrial customers.
See "Operating Revenues" above for a discussion of significant changes in wholesale revenues to affiliated companies.

MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS (continued)
Mississippi Power Company 2017 Annual Report

Fuel and Purchased Power Expenses
Fuel costs constitute one of the largest expenses for the Company. The mix of fuel sources for generation of electricity is determined primarily by demand, the unit cost of fuel consumed, and the availability of generating units. Additionally, the Company purchases a portion of its electricity needs from the wholesale market.
Details of the Company's generation and purchased power were as follows:
 2017 2016 2015
Total generation (in millions of KWHs)
15,319
 14,514
 17,014
Total purchased power (in millions of KWHs)
1,314
 1,574
 539
Sources of generation (percent) –
     
Gas92
 91
 83
Coal8
 9
 17
Cost of fuel, generated (in cents per net KWH) –
     
Gas2.69
 2.41
 2.58
Coal3.64
 3.91
 3.71
Average cost of fuel, generated (in cents per net KWH)
2.77
 2.55
 2.78
Average cost of purchased power (in cents per net KWH)
3.50
 3.07
 2.17
Fuel and purchased power expenses were $420 million in 2017, an increase of $43 million, or 11.4%, as compared to the prior year. The increase was primarily due to a $36 million increase in the average cost of generation and purchased power and a net increase of $7 million in KWHs generated from gas generation.
Fuel and purchased power expenses were $377 million in 2016, a decrease of $78 million, or 17.1%, as compared to the prior year. The decrease was primarily due to a decrease of $70 million in the volume of KWHs generated and purchased and an $8 million increase in the average cost of generation and purchased power.
Fuel and purchased power energy transactions do not have a significant impact on earnings, since energy expenses are generally offset by energy revenues through the Company's fuel cost recovery clauses. See FUTURE EARNINGS POTENTIAL – "Retail Regulatory Matters – Fuel Cost Recovery" herein and Note 1 to the financial statements under "Fuel Costs" for additional information.
Fuel
Fuel expense increased $52 million, or 15.2%, in 2017 compared to 2016 primarily due to an 11.6% higher cost of natural gas. Fuel expense decreased $100 million, or 22.6%, in 2016 compared to 2015 due to an 8.2% decrease in the average cost of fuel per KWH generated and a 15.5% decrease in the volume of KWHs generated.
Purchased Power
Purchased power expense decreased $9 million, or 26.5%, in 2017 compared to 2016. The decrease was primarily the result of a 16.5% decrease in the volume of KWHs purchased offset by a slight increase in the average cost per KWH purchased compared to 2016. Purchased power expense increased $22 million, or 183.3%, in 2016 compared to 2015. The increase in 2016 was primarily the result of a 192.1% increase in the volume of KWHs purchased due to the availability of lower cost energy as compared to the cost of self-generation.
Energy purchases will vary depending on the market prices of wholesale energy as compared to the cost of the Southern Company system's generation, demand for energy within the Southern Company system's service territory, and the availability of the Southern Company system's generation. These purchases are made in accordance with the IIC or other contractual agreements, as approved by the FERC.
Other Operations and Maintenance Expenses
Other operations and maintenance expenses decreased $30 million, or 9.6%, in 2017 compared to the prior year. The decrease was primarily due to a $10 million decrease in transmission and distribution expenses related to overhead line maintenance, an $8 million decrease in contractor services related to facilities, corporate advertising, and employee compensation and benefits, and an $8 million decrease related to the combined cycle and the associated common facilities portion of the Kemper County energy facility.

MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS (continued)
Mississippi Power Company 2017 Annual Report

Other operations and maintenance expenses increased $38 million, or 13.9%, in 2016 compared to the prior year. The increase was primarily due to increases of $28 million related to the combined cycle and associated common facilities portion of the Kemper County energy facility and $10 million in amortization of prior expense deferrals, both following the In-Service Asset Rate Order in December 2015, as well as a $7 million increase in transmission and distribution expenses primarily related to overhead line maintenance and vegetation management expenses, partially offset by a $9 million decrease in planned generation outage costs.
Depreciation and Amortization
Depreciation and amortization increased $29 million, or 22.0%, in 2017 compared to 2016 primarily due to $13 million of amortization related to the ECO plan, $7 million of depreciation for additional plant in service, and $6 million in additional regulatory asset amortization associated with the Mercury and Air Toxics Standards (MATS) rule compliance.
Depreciation and amortization increased $9 million, or 7.3%, in 2016 compared to 2015 primarily due to $32 million of additional regulatory asset amortization related to the In-Service Asset Rate Order, ECO plan, and MATS rule compliance, $13 million associated with Kemper County energy facility deferrals primarily related to depreciation deferrals in 2015, and $9 million of depreciation for additional plant in service assets primarily associated with the Plant Daniel scrubbers. These increases were partially offset by $23 million of regulatory deferrals related to the In-Service Asset Rate Order and a $22 million deferral associated with the implementation of revised ECO plan rates with the first billing cycle for September 2016.
See Note 1 to the financial statements under "Depreciation and Amortization" and Note 3 to the financial statements under "FERC Matters" and "Retail Regulatory Matters – Environmental Compliance Overview Plan" for additional information.
Taxes Other Than Income Taxes
Taxes other than income taxes decreased $5 million, or 4.6%, in 2017 compared to 2016 primarily due to a decrease in franchise taxes of $4 million, as well as a decrease in ad valorem taxes of $1 million. Taxes other than income taxes increased $15 million, or 16.0%, in 2016 compared to 2015 primarily due to increases in ad valorem taxes of $10 million, related to an increase in the assessed value of property, as well as increases in franchise taxes of $5 million, related to increased operating revenue.
The retail portion of ad valorem taxes is recoverable under the Company's ad valorem tax cost recovery clause and, therefore, does not affect net income.
Estimated Loss on Kemper IGCC
In 2017, 2016, and 2015, estimated probable losses on the Kemper IGCC of $3.36 billion, $428 million, and $365 million, respectively, were recorded. On June 28, 2017, the Company suspended the gasifier portion of the project and recorded a charge to earnings for the remaining $2.8 billion book value of the gasifier portion of the project. Prior to the suspension, the Company recorded losses for revisions of estimated costs expected to be incurred on construction of the Kemper IGCC in excess of the $2.88 billion cost cap established by the Mississippi PSC, net of $245 million of the Initial DOE Grants and excluding the Cost Cap Exceptions.
See Note 3 to the financial statements under "Kemper County Energy Facility" for additional information.
Allowance for Equity Funds Used During Construction
AFUDC equity decreased $52 million, or 41.9%, in 2017 as compared to 2016 as a result of the Kemper IGCC project suspension in June 2017. AFUDC equity increased $14 million, or 12.7%, in 2016 as compared to 2015 primarily due to a higher AFUDC rate and an increase in Kemper County energy facility CWIP subject to AFUDC prior to the suspension of the gasifier portion of the project, partially offset by placing the Plant Daniel scrubbers in service in November 2015. See ACCOUNTING POLICIES – "Application of Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates – Allowance for Funds Used During Construction" herein and Note 3 to the financial statements under "Kemper County Energy Facility" for additional information.
Interest Expense, Net of Amounts Capitalized
Interest expense, net of amounts capitalized decreased $32 million in 2017 compared to 2016. The decrease was primarily associated with a $36 million net reduction in interest following a settlement with the IRS related to research and experimental (R&E) deductions. Also contributing to the decrease was the amortization of $6 million in interest deferrals in accordance with the In-Service Asset Rate Order and a $7 million decrease in interest related to outstanding debt as a result of lower balances and lower rates. These decreases were partially offset by a $20 million reduction in interest capitalized following suspension of the Kemper County energy facility construction.
See Note 5 to the financial statements under "Section 174 Research and Experimental Deduction" for additional information.

MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS (continued)
Mississippi Power Company 2017 Annual Report

Interest expense, net of amounts capitalized increased $67 million in 2016 compared to 2015. The increase was primarily due to an increase of $31 million of interest on deposits resulting from the 2015 reversal of interest associated with the termination of an asset purchase agreement between the Company and Cooperative Energy in May 2015; a $20 million increase due to additional long-term debt and a $30 million decrease in amounts capitalized primarily resulting from $17 million of capitalized interest and the amortization of $13 million in interest deferrals in accordance with the In-Service Asset Rate Order. These net increases were partially offset by a decrease of $16 million in interest accrued on the Mirror CWIP liability prior to refund in 2015.
Income Taxes (Benefit)
Income tax benefits increased $428 million, or 411.5%, in 2017 compared to 2016 primarily due to $809 million in tax benefits on the estimated probable losses on the Kemper IGCC, net of the non-deductible AFUDC equity portion and the related state valuation allowances, partially offset by $372 million resulting from Tax Reform Legislation. Tax Reform Legislation earnings impacts are primarily due to revaluing deferred tax assets related to the Kemper County energy facility. See FUTURE EARNINGS POTENTIAL – "Income Tax Matters" herein and Note 5 to the financial statements for additional information.
Income tax benefits increased $32 million, or 44.4%, in 2016 compared to 2015 primarily as a result of an increase in the estimated probable losses on the Kemper IGCC and an increase in AFUDC equity, which is non-taxable.
Effects of Inflation
The Company is subject to rate regulation that is generally based on the recovery of historical and projected costs. The effects of inflation can create an economic loss since the recovery of costs could be in dollars that have less purchasing power. Any adverse effect of inflation on the Company's results of operations has not been substantial in recent years.
FUTURE EARNINGS POTENTIAL
General
The Company operates as a vertically integrated utility providing electric service to retail customers within its traditional service territory located in southeast Mississippi and to wholesale customers in the Southeast. Prices for electricity provided by the Company to retail customers are set by the Mississippi PSC under cost-based regulatory principles. Retail rates and earnings are reviewed and may be adjusted periodically within certain limitations. Prices for wholesale electricity sales, interconnecting transmission lines, and the exchange of electric power are regulated by the FERC. See "FERC Matters" herein, ACCOUNTING POLICIES – "Application of Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates – Utility Regulation" herein, and Note 3 to the financial statements for additional information about regulatory matters.
The results of operations for the past three years are not necessarily indicative of future earnings potential. The level of the Company's future earnings depends on numerous factors that affect the opportunities, challenges, and risks of the Company's business of providing electric service. These factors include the Company's ability to recover its prudently-incurred costs, in a timely manner during a time of increasing costs, and its ability to prevail against legal challenges associated with the Kemper County energy facility. Future earnings will be driven primarily by customer growth. Earnings will also depend upon maintaining and growing sales, considering, among other things, the adoption and/or penetration rates of increasingly energy-efficient technologies and increasing volumes of electronic commerce transactions, both of which could contribute to a net reduction in customer usage. Earnings are subject to a variety of other factors. These factors include weather, competition, developing new and maintaining existing energy contracts and associated load requirements with other utilities and other wholesale customers, energy conservation practiced by customers, the use of alternative energy sources by customers, the price of electricity, the price elasticity of demand, and the rate of economic growth or decline in the Company's service territory. Demand for electricity is primarily driven by the pace of economic growth that may be affected by changes in regional and global economic conditions, which may impact future earnings.
The Company's retail base rates are set under the PEP, a rate plan approved by the Mississippi PSC. Two filings are made for each calendar year: the PEP projected filing, which is typically filed prior to the beginning of the year based on a projected revenue requirement, and the PEP lookback filing, which is filed after the end of the year and allows for review of the actual return compared to the allowed return range. See "Retail Regulatory Matters" herein and Note 3 to the financial statements under "Retail Regulatory Matters – Performance Evaluation Plan" for more information.
On October 4, 2017, the Company executed agreements with its largest retail customer, Chevron Products Company (Chevron), to continue providing retail service to the Chevron refinery in Pascagoula, Mississippi through 2038, subject to the approval of the Mississippi PSC. The new agreements are not expected to have a material impact on the Company's earnings; however, the co-generation assets located at the refinery are expected to be accounted for as a sales-type lease in accordance with the new lease accounting rules that become effective in 2019. These assets are also subject to a security interest granted to Chevron. See

MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS (continued)
Mississippi Power Company 2017 Annual Report

FINANCIAL CONDITION AND LIQUIDITY – "Credit Rating Risk" herein for additional information. The ultimate outcome of this matter cannot be determined at this time.
On December 22, 2017, Tax Reform Legislation was signed into law and became effective on January 1, 2018, which among other things, reduces the federal corporate income tax rate to 21% and changes rates of depreciation and the business interest deduction. See "Income Tax MattersFederal Tax Reform Legislation" and FINANCIAL CONDITION AND LIQUIDITY – "Credit Rating Risk" herein and Notes 3 and 5 to the financial statements for additional information.
The Company provides service under long-term contracts with rural electric cooperative associations and municipalities located in southeastern Mississippi under cost-based electric tariffs which are subject to regulation by the FERC. The contracts with these wholesale customers represented 19.3% of the Company's total operating revenues in 2017 and are largely subject to rolling 10-year cancellation notices. Historically, these wholesale customers have acted as a group and any changes in contractual relationships for one customer are likely to be followed by the other wholesale customers.
Environmental Matters
The Company's operations are regulated by state and federal environmental agencies through a variety of laws and regulations governing air, water, land, and protection of other natural resources. The Company maintains a comprehensive environmental compliance strategy to assess upcoming requirements and compliance costs associated with these environmental laws and regulations. The costs, including capital expenditures and operations and maintenance costs, required to comply with environmental laws and regulations may impact future unit retirement and replacement decisions, results of operations, cash flows, and financial condition. Compliance costs may result from the installation of additional environmental controls, closure and monitoring of CCR facilities, unit retirements, and adding or changing fuel sources for certain existing units, as well as related upgrades to the transmission system. A major portion of these compliance costs are expected to be recovered through existing ratemaking provisions. The ultimate impact of the environmental laws and regulations discussed below will depend on various factors, such as state adoption and implementation of requirements, the availability and cost of any deployed control technology, and the outcome of pending and/or future legal challenges.
New or revised environmental laws and regulations could affect many areas of the Company's operations. The impact of any such changes cannot be determined at this time. Environmental compliance costs could affect earnings if such costs cannot continue to be fully recovered in rates on a timely basis or through long-term wholesale agreements. Further, increased costs that are recovered through regulated rates could contribute to reduced demand for electricity, which could negatively affect results of operations, cash flows, and financial condition. Additionally, many commercial and industrial customers may also be affected by existing and future environmental requirements, which for some may have the potential to ultimately affect their demand for electricity. See Note 3 to the financial statements under "Retail Regulatory Matters – Environmental Compliance Overview Plan" for additional information.
Through 2017, the Company has invested approximately $643 million in environmental capital retrofit projects to comply with environmental requirements, with annual totals of approximately $9 million, $17 million, and $94 million for 2017, 2016, and 2015, respectively. Although the timing, requirements, and estimated costs could change as environmental laws and regulations are adopted or modified, as compliance plans are revised or updated, and as legal challenges to rules are initiated or completed, the Company's current compliance strategy estimates capital expenditures of $63 million from 2018 through 2022, with annual totals of approximately $14 million, $16 million, $17 million, $13 million, and $3 million for 2018, 2019, 2020, 2021, and 2022, respectively. These estimates do not include any potential compliance costs associated with the regulation of CO2 emissions from fossil fuel-fired electric generating units. See "Global Climate Issues" herein for additional information. The Company also anticipates expenditures associated with ash pond closure and ground water monitoring under the Disposal of Coal Combustion Residuals from Electric Utilities rule (CCR Rule), which are reflected in the Company's ARO liabilities. See FINANCIAL CONDITION AND LIQUIDITY – "Capital Requirements and Contractual Obligations" herein and Note 1 to the financial statements under "Asset Retirement Obligations and Other Costs of Removal" for additional information.
Environmental Laws and Regulations
Air Quality
The EPA has set National Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS) for six air pollutants (carbon monoxide, lead, nitrogen dioxide, ozone, particulate matter, and SO2), which it reviews and revises periodically. Revisions to these standards can require additional emission controls, improvements in control efficiency, or fuel changes which can result in increased compliance and operational costs. NAAQS requirements can also adversely affect the siting of new facilities. In 2015, the EPA published a more stringent eight-hour ozone NAAQS. The EPA plans to complete designations for this rule by no later than April 30, 2018. No areas within the Company's service territory have been or are anticipated to be designated nonattainment under the 2015 ozone

MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS (continued)
Mississippi Power Company 2017 Annual Report

NAAQS. In 2010, the EPA revised the NAAQS for SO2, establishing a new one-hour standard, and is completing designations in multiple phases. The EPA has issued several rounds of area designations and no areas in the vicinity of Company-owned SO2 sources have been designated nonattainment under the 2010 one-hour SO2 NAAQS. However, final eight-hour ozone and SO2 one-hour designations for certain areas are still pending and, if other areas are designated as nonattainment in the future, increased compliance costs could result.
In 2011, the EPA finalized the Cross-State Air Pollution Rule (CSAPR) and its NOX annual, NOX seasonal, and SO2 annual programs. CSAPR is an emissions trading program that addresses the impacts of the interstate transport of SO2 and NOX emissions from fossil fuel-fired power plants located in upwind states in the eastern half of the U.S. on air quality in downwind states. The Company has fossil fuel-fired generation subject to these requirements. In October 2016, the EPA published a final rule that revised the CSAPR seasonal NOX program, establishing more stringent NOX emissions budgets in Alabama and Mississippi. The outcome of ongoing CSAPR litigation, to which the Company is a party, could have an impact on the State of Mississippi's allowance allocations under the CSAPR seasonal NOX program. Increases in either future fossil fuel-fired generation or the cost of CSAPR allowances could have a negative financial impact on results of operations for the Company.
The EPA finalized regional haze regulations in 2005 and 2017. These regulations require states, tribal governments, and various federal agencies to develop and implement plans to reduce pollutants that impair visibility and demonstrate reasonable progress toward the goal of restoring natural visibility conditions in certain areas, including national parks and wilderness areas. States must submit a revised state implementation plan (SIP) to the EPA by July 31, 2021, demonstrating reasonable progress towards achieving visibility improvement goals. State implementation of reasonable progress could require further reductions in SO2 or NOX emissions, which could result in increased compliance costs.
In 2015, the EPA published a final rule requiring certain states (including Alabama and Mississippi) to revise or remove the provisions of their SIPs regulating excess emissions at industrial facilities, including electric generating facilities, during periods of startup, shut-down, or malfunction (SSM). The state excess emission rules provide necessary operational flexibility to affected units during periods of SSM and, if removed, could affect unit availability and result in increased operations and maintenance costs for the Company. The EPA has not yet responded to the SIP revisions proposed by states where the Company's generating units are located.
Water Quality
In 2014, the EPA finalized requirements under Section 316(b) of the Clean Water Act (CWA) to regulate cooling water intake structures at existing power plants and manufacturing facilities in order to minimize their effects on fish and other aquatic life. The regulation requires plant-specific studies to determine applicable measures to protect organisms that either get caught on the intake screens (impingement) or are drawn into the cooling system (entrainment). The ultimate impact of this rule will depend on the outcome of these plant-specific studies and any additional protective measures required to be incorporated into each plant's National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit based on site-specific factors.
In 2015, the EPA finalized the steam electric effluent limitations guidelines (ELG) rule that set national standards for wastewater discharges from steam electric generating units. The rule prohibits effluent discharges of certain wastestreams and imposes stringent arsenic, mercury, selenium, and nitrate/nitrite limits on scrubber wastewater discharges. The revised technology-based limits and compliance dates may require extensive modifications to existing ash and wastewater management systems or the installation and operation of new ash and wastewater management systems. Compliance with the ELG rule is expected to require capital expenditures and increased operational costs primarily affecting the Company's coal-fired electric generation. Compliance applicability dates range from November 1, 2018 to December 31, 2023 with state environmental agencies incorporating specific applicability dates in the NPDES permitting process based on information provided for each waste stream. The EPA has committed to a new rulemaking that could potentially revise the limitations and applicability dates of the ELG rule. The EPA expects to finalize this rulemaking in 2020.
In 2015, the EPA and the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (Corps) jointly published a final rule that revised the regulatory definition of waters of the United States (WOTUS) for all CWA programs. The rule significantly expanded the scope of federal jurisdiction over waterbodies (such as rivers, streams, and canals), which could impact new generation projects and permitting and reporting requirements associated with the installation, expansion, and maintenance of transmission and distribution projects. On July 27, 2017, the EPA and the Corps proposed to rescind the 2015 WOTUS rule. The WOTUS rule has been stayed by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit since late 2015, but on January 22, 2018, the U.S. Supreme Court determined that federal district courts have jurisdiction over the pending challenges to the rule. On February 6, 2018, the EPA and the Corps published a final rule delaying implementation of the 2015 WOTUS rule to 2020.

MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS (continued)
Mississippi Power Company 2017 Annual Report

Coal Combustion Residuals
In 2015, the EPA finalized non-hazardous solid waste regulations for the disposal of CCR, including coal ash and gypsum, in landfills and surface impoundments (CCR units) at active generating power plants. The CCR Rule requires CCR units to be evaluated against a set of performance criteria and potentially closed if minimum criteria are not met. Closure of existing CCR units could require installation of equipment and infrastructure to manage CCR in accordance with the rule. The EPA has announced plans to reconsider certain portions of the CCR Rule by no later than December 2019, which could result in changes to deadlines and corrective action requirements.
The EPA's reconsideration of the CCR Rule is due in part to a legislative development that impacts the potential oversight role of state agencies. Under the Water Infrastructure Improvements for the Nation Act, which became law in 2016, states are allowed to establish permit programs for implementing the CCR Rule.
Based on cost estimates for closure and monitoring of ash ponds pursuant to the CCR Rule, the Company recorded AROs for each CCR unit in 2015. As further analysis is performed and closure details are developed, the Company will continue to periodically update these cost estimates as necessary. In December 2016, the Mississippi PSC granted a CPCN to the Company authorizing certain projects associated with complying with the CCR Rule. Additionally in this order, the Mississippi PSC also authorized the Company to recover any costs associated with the CPCN, including future monitoring costs, through the ECO clause. See FINANCIAL CONDITION AND LIQUIDITY – "Capital Requirements and Contractual Obligations" herein and Note 1 to the financial statements under "Asset Retirement Obligations and Other Costs of Removal" for additional information regarding the Company's AROs as of December 31, 2017.
Environmental Remediation
The Company must comply with environmental laws and regulations governing the handling and disposal of waste and releases of hazardous substances. Under these various laws and regulations, the Company may also incur substantial costs to clean up affected sites. The Company has authority from the Mississippi PSC to recover approved environmental compliance costs through established regulatory mechanisms. The Company recognizes a liability for environmental remediation costs only when it determines a loss is probable and reasonably estimable.
Global Climate Issues
In 2015, the EPA published final rules limiting CO2 emissions from new, modified, and reconstructed fossil fuel-fired electric generating units and guidelines for states to develop plans to meet EPA-mandated CO2 emission performance standards for existing units (known as the Clean Power Plan or CPP). In February 2016, the U.S. Supreme Court granted a stay of the CPP, which will remain in effect through the resolution of litigation in the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia challenging the legality of the CPP and any review by the U.S. Supreme Court. On March 28, 2017, the U.S. President signed an executive order directing agencies to review actions that potentially burden the development or use of domestically produced energy resources, including review of the CPP and other CO2 emissions rules. On October 10, 2017, the EPA published a proposed rule to repeal the CPP and, on December 28, 2017, published an advanced notice of proposed rulemaking regarding a CPP replacement rule.
In 2015, parties to the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change, including the United States, adopted the Paris Agreement, which established a non-binding universal framework for addressing greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions based on nationally determined contributions. On June 1, 2017, the U.S. President announced that the United States would withdraw from the Paris Agreement and begin renegotiating its terms. The ultimate impact of this agreement or any renegotiated agreement depends on its implementation by participating countries.
The EPA's GHG reporting rule requires annual reporting of GHG emissions expressed in terms of metric tons of CO2 equivalent emissions for a company's operational control of facilities. Based on ownership or financial control of facilities, the Company's 2016 GHG emissions were approximately 7 million metric tons of CO2 equivalent. The preliminary estimate of the Company's 2017 GHG emissions on the same basis is approximately 8 million metric tons of CO2 equivalent.
FERC Matters
Municipal and Rural Associations Tariff
The Company provides wholesale electric service to Cooperative Energy, East Mississippi Electric Power Association, and the City of Collins, all located in southeastern Mississippi, under a long-term cost-based, FERC regulated MRA tariff.
In March 2016, the Company reached a settlement agreement with its wholesale customers, which was subsequently approved by the FERC, for an increase in wholesale base revenues under the MRA cost-based electric tariff, primarily as a result of placing

MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS (continued)
Mississippi Power Company 2017 Annual Report

scrubbers for Plant Daniel Units 1 and 2 in service in 2015. The settlement agreement became effective for services rendered beginning May 1, 2016, resulting in an estimated annual revenue increase of $7 million under the MRA cost-based electric tariff. Additionally, under the settlement agreement, the tariff customers agreed to similar regulatory treatment for MRA tariff ratemaking as the treatment approved for retail ratemaking under the In-Service Asset Rate Order. This regulatory treatment primarily includes (i) recovery of the operational Kemper County energy facility assets providing service to customers and other related costs, (ii) amortization of the Kemper County energy facility-related regulatory assets included in rates under the settlement agreement over the 36 months ending April 30, 2019, (iii) Kemper County energy facility-related expenses included in rates under the settlement agreement no longer being deferred and charged to expense, and (iv) removing all of the Kemper County energy facility CWIP from rate base with a corresponding increase in accrual of AFUDC. The additional resulting AFUDC totaled approximately $22 million through the suspension of Kemper IGCC start-up activities and has been recorded as a charge to income.
The Company expects to make a subsequent MRA filing during the second quarter 2018. The filing is intended to be consistent with the February 6, 2018 Mississippi PSC order for cost recovery of the Kemper County energy facility, including the impact of Tax Reform Legislation. The ultimate outcome of this matter cannot be determined at this time.
On September 18, 2017, the Company and Cooperative Energy executed a Shared Service Agreement (SSA), as part of the MRA tariff, under which the Company and Cooperative Energy will share in providing electricity to all Cooperative Energy delivery points, in lieu of the current arrangement under which each delivery point is specifically assigned to either entity. The SSA accepted by the FERC on October 31, 2017 became effective on January 1, 2018 and may be cancelled by Cooperative Energy with 10 years notice after December 31, 2020. The SSA provides Cooperative Energy the option to decrease its use of the Company's generation services under the MRA tariff, subject to annual and cumulative caps and a one-year notice requirement. In the event Cooperative Energy elects to reduce these services, the related reduction in the Company's revenues is not expected to be significant through 2020.
Fuel Cost Recovery
The Company has a wholesale MRA and a Market Based (MB) fuel cost recovery factor. Effective with the first billing cycle for September 2016, fuel rates decreased $11 million annually for wholesale MRA customers and $1 million annually for wholesale MB customers. Effective January 1, 2018, the wholesale MRA fuel rate increased $11 million annually. At December 31, 2017, over-recovered wholesale MRA fuel costs were immaterial and at December 31, 2016 were approximately $13 million, which is included in over-recovered regulatory clause liabilities, current in the balance sheets.
The Company's operating revenues are adjusted for differences in actual recoverable fuel cost and amounts billed in accordance with the currently approved cost recovery rate. Accordingly, changes in the billing factor should have no significant effect on the Company's revenues or net income, but will affect cash flow.
Market-Based Rate Authority
The Company has authority from the FERC to sell electricity at market-based rates. Since 2008, that authority, for certain balancing authority areas, has been conditioned on compliance with the requirements of an energy auction, which the FERC found to be tailored mitigation that addresses potential market power concerns. In accordance with FERC regulations governing such authority, the traditional electric operating companies (including the Company) and Southern Power filed a triennial market power analysis in 2014, which included continued reliance on the energy auction as tailored mitigation. In 2015, the FERC issued an order finding that the traditional electric operating companies' (including the Company's) and Southern Power's existing tailored mitigation may not effectively mitigate the potential to exert market power in certain areas served by the traditional electric operating companies and in some adjacent areas. The FERC directed the traditional electric operating companies (including the Company) and Southern Power to show why market-based rate authority should not be revoked in these areas or to provide a mitigation plan to further address market power concerns. The traditional electric operating companies (including the Company) and Southern Power filed a request for rehearing and filed their response with the FERC in 2015.
In December 2016, the traditional electric operating companies (including the Company) and Southern Power filed an amendment to their market-based rate tariff that proposed certain changes to the energy auction, as well as several non-tariff changes. On February 2, 2017, the FERC issued an order accepting all such changes subject to an additional condition of cost-based price caps for certain sales outside of the energy auction, finding that all of these changes would provide adequate alternative mitigation for the traditional electric operating companies' (including the Company's) and Southern Power's potential to exert market power in certain areas served by the traditional electric operating companies (including the Company) and in some adjacent areas. On May 17, 2017, the FERC accepted the traditional electric operating companies' (including the Company's) and Southern Power's compliance filing accepting the terms of the order. While the FERC's February 2, 2017 order references the market power proceeding discussed above, it remains a separate, ongoing matter.

MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS (continued)
Mississippi Power Company 2017 Annual Report

On October 25, 2017, the FERC issued an order in response to the traditional electric operating companies' (including the Company's) and Southern Power's June 29, 2017 triennial updated market power analysis. The FERC directed the traditional electric operating companies (including the Company) and Southern Power to show cause within 60 days why market-based rate authority should not be revoked in certain areas adjacent to the area presently under mitigation in accordance with the February 2, 2017 order or to provide a mitigation plan to further address market power concerns. On November 10, 2017, the traditional electric operating companies (including the Company) and Southern Power responded to the FERC and proposed to resolve matters by applying the alternative mitigation authorized by the February 2, 2017 order to the adjacent areas made the subject of the October 25, 2017 order.
The ultimate outcome of these matters cannot be determined at this time.
Cooperative Energy Power Supply Agreement
In 2008, the Company entered into a 10-year Power Supply Agreement (PSA) with Cooperative Energy for approximately 152 MWs, which became effective in 2011. Following certain plant retirements, the PSA capacity was reduced to 86 MWs. On February 5, 2018, the Company and Cooperative Energy executed an amendment to extend the PSA through March 31, 2021, effective April 1, 2018, with increased total capacity of 286 MWs.
Cooperative Energy also has a 10-year Network Integration Transmission Service Agreement (NITSA) with SCS for transmission service to certain delivery points on the Company's transmission system that became effective in 2011. As a result of the PSA amendments, Cooperative Energy and SCS amended the terms of the NITSA on January 12, 2018 to provide for the purchase of incremental transmission capacity for service beginning April 1, 2018 through March 31, 2021. This NITSA amendment remains subject to acceptance by the FERC. The ultimate outcome of these matters cannot be determined at this time.
Retail Regulatory Matters
General
The Company's rates and charges for service to retail customers are subject to the regulatory oversight of the Mississippi PSC. The Company's rates are a combination of base rates and several separate cost recovery clauses for specific categories of costs. These separate cost recovery clauses address such items as fuel and purchased power, energy efficiency programs, ad valorem taxes, property damage, and the costs of compliance with environmental laws and regulations. Costs not addressed through one of the specific cost recovery clauses are expected to be recovered through the Company's base rates. See Note 3 to the financial statements under "Retail Regulatory Matters" and "Kemper County Energy Facility" for additional information.
In 2012, the Mississippi PSC issued an order for the purpose of investigating and reviewing, for informational purposes only, the ROE formulas used by the Company and all other regulated electric utilities in Mississippi. In 2013, the MPUS filed with the Mississippi PSC its report on the ROE formulas used by the Company and all other regulated electric utilities in Mississippi.
In 2014, the Mississippi PSC issued an order for the purpose of investigating and reviewing the adoption of a uniform formula rate plan for the Company and other regulated electric utilities in Mississippi.
On January 26, 2018, the Mississippi PSC issued an order directing utilities to file within 30 days information regarding the impact on rates resulting from Tax Reform Legislation. The Company's Kemper County energy facility rates, approved on February 6, 2018, include the effects of Tax Reform Legislation. The Company's 2018 ECO, revised 2018 PEP, and 2018 SRR rate filings, all submitted in February 2018, include the effects of Tax Reform Legislation and are subject to approval by the Mississippi PSC.
The ultimate outcome of these matters cannot be determined at this time.
Performance Evaluation Plan
The Company's retail base rates are set under the PEP, a rate plan approved by the Mississippi PSC. Two filings are made for each calendar year: the PEP projected filing, which is typically filed prior to the beginning of the year based on a projected revenue requirement, and the PEP lookback filing, which is filed after the end of the year and allows for review of the actual revenue requirement compared to the projected filing.
In 2011, the Company submitted its annual PEP lookback filing for 2010, which recommended no surcharge or refund. Later in 2011, the MPUS disputed certain items in the 2010 PEP lookback filing. In 2012, the Mississippi PSC issued an order canceling the Company's PEP lookback filing for 2011. In 2013, the MPUS contested the Company's PEP lookback filing for 2012, which indicated a refund due to customers of $5 million. Unresolved matters related to the 2010 PEP lookback filing, which remain under review, also impact the 2012 PEP lookback filing.

MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS (continued)
Mississippi Power Company 2017 Annual Report

In 2013, the Mississippi PSC approved the projected PEP filing for 2013, which resulted in a rate increase of 1.9%, or $15 million, annually, effective March 19, 2013. The Company may be entitled to $3 million in additional revenues related to 2013 as a result of the late implementation of the 2013 PEP rate increase.
In 2014, 2015, 2016, and 2017, the Company submitted its annual PEP lookback filings for the prior years, which for 2013 and 2014 each indicated no surcharge or refund and for each of 2015 and 2016 indicated a $5 million surcharge. Additionally, in July 2016, in November 2016, and on November 15, 2017, the Company submitted its annual projected PEP filings for 2016, 2017, and 2018, respectively, which for 2016 and 2017 indicated no change in rates and for 2018 indicated a rate increase of 4%, or $38 million in annual revenues. The Mississippi PSC suspended each of these filings to allow more time for review.
On February 7, 2018, the Company revised its annual projected PEP filing for 2018 to reflect the impacts of Tax Reform Legislation. The revised filing requests an increase of $26 million in annual revenues, based on a performance adjusted ROE of 9.33% and an increased equity ratio of 55%. See FUTURE EARNINGS POTENTIAL – "Income Tax Matters – Federal Tax Reform Legislation" herein and Note 5 to the financial statements for additional information.
The ultimate outcome of these matters cannot be determined at this time.
Energy Efficiency
In 2013, the Mississippi PSC approved an energy efficiency and conservation rule requiring electric and gas utilities in Mississippi serving more than 25,000 customers to implement energy efficiency programs and standards. Quick Start Plans, which include a portfolio of energy efficiency programs that are intended to provide benefits to a majority of customers, were extended by an order issued by the Mississippi PSC in July 2016, until the time the Mississippi PSC approves a comprehensive portfolio plan program. The ultimate outcome of this matter cannot be determined at this time.
On July 6, 2017, the Mississippi PSC issued an order approving the Company's Energy Efficiency Cost Rider 2017 compliance filing, which increased annual retail revenues by approximately $2 million effective with the first billing cycle for August 2017.
On November 30, 2017, the Company submitted its Energy Efficiency Cost Rider 2018 compliance filing, which included a small decrease in annual retail revenues. The ultimate outcome of this matter cannot be determined at this time.
See Note 3 to the financial statements under "Retail Regulatory Matters" for additional information.
Environmental Compliance Overview Plan
In 2012, the Mississippi PSC approved the Company's request for a CPCN to construct scrubbers on Plant Daniel Units 1 and 2, which were placed in service in 2015. These units are jointly owned by the Company and Gulf Power, with 50% ownership each. In 2014, the Company entered into a settlement agreement with the Sierra Club under which, among other things, the Company agreed to retire, repower with natural gas, or convert to an alternative non-fossil fuel source Plant Sweatt Units 1 and 2 (80 MWs) no later than December 2018 (and the units were retired in July 2016). The Company also agreed that it would cease burning coal and other solid fuel at Plant Watson Units 4 and 5 (750 MWs) and begin operating those units solely on natural gas no later than April 2015 (which occurred in April 2015) and cease burning coal and other solid fuel at Plant Greene County Units 1 and 2 (200 MWs) no later than April 2016 (which occurred in February and March 2016, respectively) and begin operating those units solely on natural gas (which occurred in June and July 2016, respectively).
In accordance with a 2011 accounting order from the Mississippi PSC, the Company has the authority to defer in a regulatory asset for future recovery all plant retirement- or partial retirement-related costs resulting from environmental regulations. The Mississippi PSC approved $41 million and $17 million of costs that were reclassified to regulatory assets associated with Plant Watson and Plant Greene County, respectively, for amortization over five-year periods that began in July 2016 and July 2017, respectively. As a result, these decisions are not expected to have a material impact on the Company's financial statements.
In August 2016, the Mississippi PSC approved the Company's revised ECO plan filing for 2016, which requested the maximum 2% annual increase in revenues, or approximately $18 million, primarily related to the Plant Daniel Units 1 and 2 scrubbers placed in service in 2015. The revised rates became effective with the first billing cycle for September 2016. Approximately $22 million of related revenue requirements in excess of the 2% maximum was deferred for inclusion in the 2017 filing, along with related carrying costs.
On May 4, 2017, the Mississippi PSC approved the Company's ECO plan filing for 2017, which requested the maximum 2% annual increase in revenues, or approximately $18 million, primarily related to the carryforward from the prior year. The rates became effective with the first billing cycle for June 2017. Approximately $26 million of related revenue requirements in excess of the 2% maximum was deferred for inclusion in the 2018 filing, along with related carrying costs.

MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS (continued)
Mississippi Power Company 2017 Annual Report

On February 14, 2018, the Company submitted its ECO plan filing for 2018, including the effects of Tax Reform Legislation, which requested the maximum 2% annual increase in revenues, or approximately $17 million, primarily related to the carryforward from the prior year. Approximately $13 million of related revenue requirements in excess of the 2% maximum, along with related carrying costs, remains deferred for inclusion in the 2019 filing. The ultimate outcome of this matter cannot be determined at this time.
Fuel Cost Recovery
The Company establishes, annually, a retail fuel cost recovery factor that is approved by the Mississippi PSC. The Company is required to file for an adjustment to the retail fuel cost recovery factor annually. On January 12, 2017, the Mississippi PSC approved the 2017 retail fuel cost recovery factor, effective February 2017 through January 2018, which resulted in an annual revenue increase of approximately $55 million. On November 15, 2017, the Company filed its annual rate adjustment under the retail fuel cost recovery clause, requesting an additional increase of $39 million annually, which the Mississippi PSC approved on January 16, 2018 effective February 2018 through January 2019. At December 31, 2017, the amount of under-recovered retail fuel costs included in the balance sheet in customer accounts receivable was approximately $6 million compared to $37 million over recovered at December 31, 2016.
The Company's operating revenues are adjusted for differences in actual recoverable fuel cost and amounts billed in accordance with the currently approved cost recovery rate. Accordingly, changes in the billing factor should have no significant effect on the Company's revenues or net income, but will affect cash flow.
Ad Valorem Tax Adjustment
The Company establishes, annually, an ad valorem tax adjustment factor that is approved by the Mississippi PSC to collect the ad valorem taxes paid by the Company. On July 6, 2017, the Mississippi PSC approved the Company's annual ad valorem tax adjustment factor filing for 2017, which included an annual rate increase of 0.85%, or $8 million in annual retail revenues, primarily due to increased assessments.
System Restoration Rider
In February 2016, the Company submitted its 2016 SRR rate filing which proposed no changes to either the SRR rate or the annual property damage reserve accrual of $3 million annually. On February 3, 2017, the Company submitted its 2017 SRR rate filing, which proposed an increase in the property damage reserve accrual of $1 million. These filings were suspended by the Mississippi PSC for review.
On January 21, 2017, a tornado caused extensive damage to the Company's transmission and distribution infrastructure. Storm damage repairs were approximately $9 million. A portion of these costs was charged to the retail property damage reserve and was addressed in the 2018 SRR rate filing.
On February 1, 2018, the Company submitted its 2018 SRR rate filing, including the effects of Tax Reform Legislation, which proposed that the SRR rate remain at zero and the annual accrual for the property damage reserve be reduced to $2 million in 2018.
The ultimate outcome of these matters cannot be determined at this time. See Note 1 to the financial statements under "Provision for Property Damage" for additional information.
Storm Damage Cost Recovery
In connection with the damage associated with Hurricane Katrina, the Mississippi PSC authorized the issuance of system restoration bonds in 2006. In accordance with a Mississippi PSC order on January 24, 2017, the Company eliminated the applicable Storm Restoration Charge because the bond sinking fund managed by the Mississippi State Bond Commission is substantially funded.
Kemper County Energy Facility
Overview
The Kemper County energy facility was designed to utilize IGCC technology with an expected output capacity of 582 MWs and to be fueled by locally mined lignite (an abundant, lower heating value coal) from a mine owned by the Company and situated adjacent to the Kemper County energy facility. The mine, operated by North American Coal Corporation, started commercial operation in 2013. In connection with the Kemper County energy facility construction, the Company constructed approximately 61 miles of CO2 pipeline infrastructure for the transport of captured CO2 for use in enhanced oil recovery.

MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS (continued)
Mississippi Power Company 2017 Annual Report

Schedule and Cost Estimate
In 2012, the Mississippi PSC issued the 2012 MPSC CPCN Order, confirming the CPCN originally approved by the Mississippi PSC in 2010 authorizing the acquisition, construction, and operation of the Kemper County energy facility. The certificated cost estimate of the Kemper County energy facility included in the 2012 MPSC CPCN Order was $2.4 billion, net of approximately $0.57 billion in Cost Cap Exceptions. The 2012 MPSC CPCN Order approved a construction cost cap of up to $2.88 billion, with recovery of prudently-incurred costs subject to approval by the Mississippi PSC. The Kemper County energy facility was originally projected to be placed in service in May 2014. The Company placed the combined cycle and the associated common facilities portion of the Kemper County energy facility in service in August 2014.
The initial production of syngas began on July 14, 2016 for gasifier "B" and on September 13, 2016 for gasifier "A." The Company achieved integrated operation of both gasifiers on January 29, 2017, including the production of electricity from syngas in both combustion turbines. During testing, the plant produced and captured CO2, and produced sulfuric acid and ammonia, each of acceptable quality under the related off-take agreements. However, the Company experienced numerous challenges during the extended start-up process to achieve integrated operation of the gasifiers on a sustained basis. In May 2017, after achieving these milestones, the Company determined that a critical system component, the syngas coolers, would need replacement sooner than originally planned, which would require significant lead time and significant cost. In addition, the long-term natural gas price forecast had decreased significantly and the estimated cost of operating and maintaining the facility during the first five full years of operations had increased significantly since certification.
On June 21, 2017, the Mississippi PSC stated its intent to issue an order (which occurred on July 6, 2017) directing the Company to pursue a settlement under which the Kemper County energy facility would be operated as a natural gas plant, rather than an IGCC plant, and address all issues associated with the Kemper County energy facility. On June 28, 2017, the Company notified the Mississippi PSC that it would begin a process to suspend operations and start-up activities on the gasifier portion of the Kemper County energy facility, given the uncertainty as to its future.
At the time of project suspension in June 2017, the total cost estimate for the Kemper County energy facility was approximately $7.38 billion, including approximately $5.95 billion of costs subject to the construction cost cap, and was net of the $137 million in Additional DOE Grants. In the aggregate, the Company had recorded charges to income of $3.07 billion ($1.89 billion after tax) as a result of changes in the cost estimate above the cost cap for the Kemper IGCC through May 31, 2017.
Given the Mississippi PSC's stated intent regarding no further rate increase for the Kemper County energy facility and the subsequent suspension, cost recovery of the gasifier portions became no longer probable; therefore, the Company recorded an additional charge to income in June 2017 of $2.8 billion ($2.0 billion after tax), which included estimated costs associated with the gasifier portions of the plant and lignite mine. During the third and fourth quarters of 2017, the Company recorded charges to income of $242 million ($206 million after tax), including $164 million for ongoing project costs, estimated mine and gasifier-related costs, and certain termination costs during the suspension period prior to conclusion of the Kemper Settlement Docket, as well as the charge associated with the Kemper Settlement Agreement discussed below. Additional pre-tax cancellation costs, including mine and plant closure and contract termination costs, currently estimated at approximately $50 million to $100 million (excluding salvage), are expected to be incurred in 2018. The Company has begun efforts to dispose of or abandon the mine and gasifier-related assets.
Rate Recovery
Kemper Settlement Agreement
On February 6, 2018, the Mississippi PSC voted to approve the Kemper Settlement Agreement. The Kemper Settlement Agreement provides for an annual revenue requirement of approximately $99.3 million for costs related to the Kemper County energy facility, which includes the impact of Tax Reform Legislation. The revenue requirement is based on (i) a fixed ROE for 2018 of 8.6% excluding any performance adjustment, (ii) a ROE for 2019 calculated in accordance with PEP, excluding the performance adjustment, (iii) for future years, a performance-based ROE calculated pursuant to PEP, and (iv) amortization periods for the related regulatory assets and liabilities of eight years and six years, respectively. The revenue requirement also reflects a disallowance related to a portion of the Company's investment in the Kemper County energy facility requested for inclusion in rate base, which was recorded in the fourth quarter 2017 as an additional charge to income of approximately $78 million ($85 million net of accumulated depreciation of $7 million) pre-tax ($48 million after tax).
Under the Kemper Settlement Agreement, retail customer rates will reflect a reduction of approximately $26.8 million annually and include no recovery for costs associated with the gasifier portion of the Kemper County energy facility in 2018 or at any future date. On February 12, 2018, the Company made the required compliance filing with the Mississippi PSC. The Kemper

MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS (continued)
Mississippi Power Company 2017 Annual Report

Settlement Agreement also requires (i) the CPCN for the Kemper County energy facility to be modified to limit it to natural gas combined cycle operation and (ii) the Company to file a reserve margin plan with the Mississippi PSC by August 2018.
As of December 31, 2017, the balances associated with the Kemper County energy facility regulatory assets and liabilities were $114 million and $26 million, respectively.
As a result of the Mississippi PSC order on February 6, 2018, rate recovery for the Kemper County energy facility is resolved, subject to any future legal challenges.
2015 Rate Case
On December 3, 2015, the Mississippi PSC issued the In-Service Asset Rate Order regarding the Kemper County energy facility assets that were commercially operational and currently providing service to customers (the transmission facilities, combined cycle, natural gas pipeline, and water pipeline) and other related costs. The In-Service Asset Rate Order provided for retail rate recovery of an annual revenue requirement of approximately $126 million, based on the Company's actual average capital structure, with a maximum common equity percentage of 49.733%, a 9.225% return on common equity, and actual embedded interest costs. The In-Service Asset Rate Order also included a prudence finding of all costs in the stipulated revenue requirement calculation for the in-service assets.
In connection with the implementation of the In-Service Asset Rate Order and wholesale rates, the Company began expensing certain ongoing project costs and certain retail debt carrying costs that previously were deferred and began amortizing certain regulatory assets associated with assets placed in service and consulting and legal fees over periods ranging from two years to 10 years. On July 6, 2017, the Mississippi PSC issued an order requiring the Company to establish a regulatory liability account to maintain current rates related to the Kemper County energy facility following the July 2017 completion of the amortization period for certain of these regulatory assets. See "FERC Matters" herein for additional information related to the 2016 settlement agreement with wholesale customers.
Lignite Mine and CO2 Pipeline Facilities
The Company owns the lignite mine and equipment and mineral reserves located around the Kemper County energy facility site. The mine started commercial operation in June 2013.
In 2010, the Company executed a 40-year management fee contract with Liberty Fuels Company, LLC (Liberty Fuels), a wholly-owned subsidiary of The North American Coal Corporation, which developed, constructed, and is responsible for the mining operations through the end of the mine reclamation. As the mining permit holder, Liberty Fuels has a legal obligation to perform mine reclamation and the Company has a contractual obligation to fund all reclamation activities. The Company expects mine reclamation to begin in 2018. In addition to the obligation to fund the reclamation activities, the Company provided working capital support to Liberty Fuels through cash advances for capital purchases, payroll, and other operating expenses. See Note 1 to the financial statements under "Asset Retirement Obligations and Other Costs of Removal" and "Variable Interest Entities" for additional information.
In addition, the Company constructed the CO2 pipeline for the planned transport of captured CO2 for use in enhanced oil recovery and entered into an agreement with Denbury Onshore (Denbury) to purchase the captured CO2. Denbury has the right to terminate the contract at any time because the Company did not place the Kemper IGCC in service by July 1, 2017.
The ultimate outcome of these matters cannot be determined at this time.
Litigation
On April 26, 2016, a complaint against the Company was filed in Harrison County Circuit Court (Circuit Court) by Biloxi Freezing & Processing Inc., Gulfside Casino Partnership, and John Carlton Dean, which was amended and refiled on July 11, 2016 to include, among other things, Southern Company as a defendant. The individual plaintiff alleges that the Company and Southern Company violated the Mississippi Unfair Trade Practices Act. All plaintiffs have alleged that the Company and Southern Company concealed, falsely represented, and failed to fully disclose important facts concerning the cost and schedule of the Kemper County energy facility and that these alleged breaches have unjustly enriched the Company and Southern Company. The plaintiffs seek unspecified actual damages and punitive damages; ask the Circuit Court to appoint a receiver to oversee, operate, manage, and otherwise control all affairs relating to the Kemper County energy facility; ask the Circuit Court to revoke any licenses or certificates authorizing the Company or Southern Company to engage in any business related to the Kemper County energy facility in Mississippi; and seek attorney's fees, costs, and interest. The plaintiffs also seek an injunction to prevent any Kemper County energy facility costs from being charged to customers through electric rates. On June 23, 2017, the Circuit Court ruled in favor of motions by Southern Company and the Company and dismissed the case. On July 7, 2017, the plaintiffs filed notice of an appeal. The Company believes this legal challenge has no merit; however, an adverse outcome in this proceeding

MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS (continued)
Mississippi Power Company 2017 Annual Report

could have a material impact on the Company's results of operations, financial condition, and liquidity. The Company intends to vigorously defend itself in this matter and the ultimate outcome of this matter cannot be determined at this time.
On June 9, 2016, Treetop, Greenleaf CO2 Solutions, LLC (Greenleaf), Tenrgys, LLC, Tellus Energy, LLC, WCOA, LLC, and Tellus Operating Group filed a complaint against the Company, Southern Company, and SCS in the state court in Gwinnett County, Georgia. The complaint related to the cancelled CO2 contract with Treetop and alleged fraudulent misrepresentation, fraudulent concealment, civil conspiracy, and breach of contract on the part of the Company, Southern Company, and SCS and sought compensatory damages of $100 million, as well as unspecified punitive damages. Southern Company, the Company, and SCS moved to compel arbitration pursuant to the terms of the CO2 contract, which the court granted on May 4, 2017. On June 28, 2017, Treetop, Greenleaf, Tenrgys, LLC, Tellus Energy, LLC, WCOA, LLC, and Tellus Operating Group filed a claim for arbitration requesting $500 million in damages. On December 28, 2017, the Company reached a settlement agreement with Treetop, Greenleaf, Tenrgys, LLC, Tellus Energy, LLC, WCOA, LLC, and Tellus Operating Group and the arbitration was dismissed.
See Note 3 to the financial statements under "Kemper County Energy Facility" for additional information.
Income Tax Matters
Federal Tax Reform Legislation
On December 22, 2017, the Tax Reform Legislation was signed into law and became effective on January 1, 2018. The Tax Reform Legislation, among other things, reduces the federal corporate income tax rate to 21%, retains normalization provisions for public utility property and existing renewable energy incentives, and repeals the corporate alternative minimum tax.
Regulated utility businesses can continue deducting all business interest expense and are not eligible for bonus depreciation on capital assets acquired and placed in service after September 27, 2017. Projects with binding contracts before September 28, 2017 and placed in service after September 27, 2017 remain eligible for bonus depreciation under the Protecting Americans from Tax Hikes (PATH) Act.
In addition, under the Tax Reform Legislation, net operating losses (NOL) generated after December 31, 2017 can no longer be carried back to previous tax years but can be carried forward indefinitely, with utilization limited to 80% of taxable income in the subsequent tax year.
For the year ended December 31, 2017, implementation of the Tax Reform Legislation resulted in an estimated net tax expense of $372 million and a $375 million increase in regulatory liabilities as of December 31, 2017, primarily due to the impact of the reduction of the corporate income tax rate on deferred tax assets and liabilities.
The Tax Reform Legislation is subject to further interpretation and guidance from the IRS, as well as each respective state's adoption. In addition, the regulatory treatment of certain impacts of the Tax Reform Legislation is subject to the discretion of the FERC and the Mississippi PSC. On January 31, 2018, SCS, on behalf of the traditional electric operating companies (including the Company), filed with the FERC a reduction to the Company's open access transmission tariff charge for 2018 to reflect the revised federal corporate tax rate. See Note 3 to the financial statements under "Regulatory Matters" for additional information regarding the Company's rate filings to reflect the impacts of the Tax Reform Legislation.
See FINANCIAL CONDITION AND LIQUIDITY – "Credit Rating Risk" herein and Note 5 to the financial statements under "Current and Deferred Income Taxes" for additional information.
The ultimate outcome of these matters cannot be determined at this time.
Bonus Depreciation
Under the Tax Reform Legislation, projects with binding contracts prior to September 28, 2017 and placed in service after September 27, 2017 remain eligible for bonus depreciation under the PATH Act.  The PATH Act allowed for 50% bonus depreciation for 2015 through 2017, 40% bonus depreciation for 2018, and 30% bonus depreciation for 2019 and certain long-lived assets placed in service in 2020. Based on provisional estimates, approximately $50 million of positive cash flows is expected to result from bonus depreciation for the 2017 tax year and approximately $10 million for the 2018 tax year. Should Southern Company have a NOL in 2018, all of these cash flows may not be fully realized in 2018. All projected tax benefits previously received for bonus depreciation related to the Kemper IGCC were repaid in connection with third quarter 2017 estimated tax payments. Additionally, Southern Company will record an abandonment loss on its 2018 corporate income tax return, which may not be fully realized should Southern Company have a NOL in 2018. See Notes 3 and 5 to the financial statements under "Kemper County Energy Facility" and "Current and Deferred Income Taxes," respectively, for additional information. The ultimate outcome of these matters cannot be determined at this time.

MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS (continued)
Mississippi Power Company 2017 Annual Report

Section 174 Research and Experimental Deduction
Southern Company, on behalf of the Company, has reflected deductions for R&E expenditures related to the Kemper County energy facility in its federal income tax calculations since 2013 and filed amended federal income tax returns for 2008 through 2013 to also include such deductions. In December 2016, Southern Company and the IRS reached a proposed settlement, which was approved on September 8, 2017 by the U.S. Congress Joint Committee on Taxation (JCT), resolving a methodology for these deductions. As a result of this approval, the Company recognized $176 million of previously unrecognized tax benefits and reversed $36 million of associated accrued interest.
Other Matters
The Company is involved in various other matters being litigated and regulatory matters that could affect future earnings. In addition, the Company is subject to certain claims and legal actions arising in the ordinary course of business. The Company's business activities are subject to extensive governmental regulation related to public health and the environment, such as regulation of air emissions and water discharges. Litigation over environmental issues and claims of various types, including property damage, personal injury, common law nuisance, and citizen enforcement of environmental requirements, such as standards for air, water, land, and protection of other natural resources, has occurred throughout the U.S. This litigation has included claims for damages alleged to have been caused by CO2 and other emissions, CCR, and alleged exposure to hazardous materials, and/or requests for injunctive relief in connection with such matters.
The ultimate outcome of such pending or potential litigation or regulatory matters cannot be predicted at this time; however, for current proceedings not specifically reported herein or in Note 3 to the financial statements, management does not anticipate that the ultimate liabilities, if any, arising from such current proceedings would have a material effect on the Company's financial statements. See Note 3 to the financial statements for a discussion of various other contingencies, regulatory matters, and other matters being litigated which may affect future earnings potential.
In 2013, the Company submitted a claim under the Deep Horizon Economic and Property Damages Settlement Agreement associated with the oil spill that occurred in the Gulf of Mexico. The ultimate outcome of this matter cannot be determined at this time.
In 2016, the SEC began conducting a formal investigation of Southern Company and the Company concerning the estimated costs and expected in-service date of the Kemper County energy facility. On November 30, 2017, the SEC staff notified Southern Company that it had concluded its investigation with no recommended enforcement action.
ACCOUNTING POLICIES
Application of Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates
The Company prepares its financial statements in accordance with GAAP. Significant accounting policies are described in Note 1 to the financial statements. In the application of these policies, certain estimates are made that may have a material impact on the Company's results of operations and related disclosures. Different assumptions and measurements could produce estimates that are significantly different from those recorded in the financial statements. Senior management has reviewed and discussed the following critical accounting policies and estimates with the Audit Committee of Southern Company's Board of Directors.
Utility Regulation
The Company is subject to retail regulation by the Mississippi PSC and wholesale regulation by the FERC. These regulatory agencies set the rates the Company is permitted to charge customers based on allowable costs. As a result, the Company applies accounting standards which require the financial statements to reflect the effects of rate regulation. Through the ratemaking process, the regulators may require the inclusion of costs or revenues in periods different than when they would be recognized by a non-regulated company. This treatment may result in the deferral of expenses and the recording of related regulatory assets based on anticipated future recovery through rates or the deferral of gains or creation of liabilities and the recording of related regulatory liabilities. The application of the accounting standards has a further effect on the Company's financial statements as a result of the estimates of allowable costs used in the ratemaking process. These estimates may differ from those actually incurred by the Company; therefore, the accounting estimates inherent in specific costs such as depreciation and pension and other postretirement benefits have less of a direct impact on the Company's results of operations and financial condition than they would on a non-regulated company.
As reflected in Note 1 to the financial statements, significant regulatory assets and liabilities have been recorded. Management reviews the ultimate recoverability of these regulatory assets and any requirement to refund these regulatory liabilities based on

MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS (continued)
Mississippi Power Company 2017 Annual Report

applicable regulatory guidelines and GAAP. However, adverse legislative, judicial, or regulatory actions could materially impact the amounts of such regulatory assets and liabilities and could adversely impact the Company's financial statements.
Kemper County Energy Facility Rate Recovery
For periods prior to the second quarter 2017, significant accounting estimates included Kemper County energy facility estimated construction costs, project completion date, and rate recovery. The Company recorded total pre-tax charges to income related to the Kemper County energy facility of $428 million ($264 million after tax) in 2016, $365 million ($226 million after tax) in 2015, $868 million ($536 million after tax) in 2014, and $1.2 billion ($729 million after tax) in prior years.
As a result of the Mississippi PSC's June 21, 2017 stated intent to issue an order (which occurred on July 6, 2017) directing the Company to pursue a settlement under which the Kemper County energy facility would be operated as a natural gas plant rather than an IGCC plant, as well as the Company's June 28, 2017 suspension of the operation and start-up of the gasifier portion of the Kemper County energy facility, the estimated construction costs and project completion date are no longer considered significant accounting estimates.
Given the Mississippi PSC's stated intent regarding no further rate increase for the Kemper County energy facility and the subsequent suspension, cost recovery of the gasifier portions became no longer probable; therefore, the Company recorded an additional charge to income in June 2017 of $2.8 billion ($2.0 billion after tax), which included estimated costs associated with the gasifier portions of the plant and lignite mine. During the third and fourth quarters of 2017, the Company recorded charges to income of $242 million ($206 million after tax), including $164 million for ongoing project costs, estimated mine and gasifier-related costs, and certain termination costs during the suspension period prior to conclusion of the Kemper Settlement Docket, as well as a charge of $78 million associated with the Kemper Settlement Agreement.
In the aggregate, since the Kemper County energy facility project started, the Company has incurred charges of $6.20 billion ($4.14 billion after tax) through December 31, 2017. See Note 11 to the financial statements for additional information on the individual charges by quarter.
As a result of the Mississippi PSC order on February 6, 2018, rate recovery for the Kemper County energy facility is resolved, subject to any future legal challenges, and no longer represents a critical accounting estimate.
See Note 3 to the financial statements under "Kemper County Energy Facility" for additional information.
Federal Tax Reform Legislation
Following the enactment of Tax Reform Legislation, the SEC staff issued Staff Accounting Bulletin 118 – "Income Tax Accounting Implications of the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act" (SAB 118), which provides for a measurement period of up to one year from the enactment date to complete accounting under GAAP for the tax effects of the legislation. Due to the complex and comprehensive nature of the enacted tax law changes, and their application under GAAP, the Company considers all amounts recorded in the financial statements as a result of Tax Reform Legislation to be "provisional" as discussed in SAB 118 and subject to revision. The Company is awaiting additional guidance from industry and income tax authorities in order to finalize its accounting. The ultimate impact of Tax Reform Legislation on deferred income tax assets and liabilities and the related regulatory assets and liabilities cannot be determined at this time. See FUTURE EARNINGS POTENTIAL – "Income Tax Matters – Federal Tax Reform Legislation" herein and Notes 3 and 5 to the financial statements under "Retail Regulatory Matters – Rate Plans" and "Current and Deferred Income Taxes," respectively, for additional information.
Asset Retirement Obligations
AROs are computed as the fair value of the estimated ultimate costs for an asset's future retirement and are recorded in the period in which the liability is incurred. The costs are capitalized as part of the related long-lived asset and depreciated over the asset's useful life. In the absence of quoted market prices, AROs are estimated using present value techniques in which estimates of future cash outlays associated with the asset retirements are discounted using a credit-adjusted risk-free rate. Estimates of the timing and amounts of future cash outlays are based on projections of when and how the assets will be retired and the cost of future removal activities.
The liability for AROs primarily relates to facilities that are subject to the CCR Rule, principally ash ponds. In addition, the Company has retirement obligations related to various landfill sites, underground storage tanks, deep injection wells, water wells, substation removal, mine reclamation, and asbestos removal. The Company also has identified retirement obligations related to certain transmission and distribution facilities and certain wireless communication towers. However, liabilities for the removal of these assets have not been recorded because the settlement timing for the retirement obligations related to these assets is indeterminable and, therefore, the fair value of the retirement obligations cannot be reasonably estimated. A liability for these AROs will be recognized when sufficient information becomes available to support a reasonable estimation of the ARO.

MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS (continued)
Mississippi Power Company 2017 Annual Report

The cost estimates for AROs related to the disposal of CCR are based on information using various assumptions related to closure and post-closure costs, timing of future cash outlays, inflation and discount rates, and the potential methods for complying with the CCR Rule requirements for closure. As further analysis is performed and closure details are developed, the Company will continue to periodically update these cost estimates as necessary. See FUTURE EARNINGS POTENTIAL – "Environmental Matters – Environmental Laws and Regulations – Coal Combustion Residuals" herein and Note 1 to the financial statements under "Asset Retirement Obligations and Other Costs of Removal" for additional information.
Given the significant judgment involved in estimating AROs, the Company considers the liabilities for AROs to be critical accounting estimates.
Pension and Other Postretirement Benefits
The Company's calculation of pension and other postretirement benefits expense is dependent on a number of assumptions. These assumptions include discount rates, healthcare cost trend rates, expected long-term return on plan assets, mortality rates, expected salary and wage increases, and other factors. Components of pension and other postretirement benefits expense include interest and service cost on the pension and other postretirement benefit plans, expected return on plan assets, and amortization of certain unrecognized costs and obligations. Actual results that differ from the assumptions utilized are accumulated and amortized over future periods and, therefore, generally affect recognized expense and the recorded obligation in future periods. While the Company believes that the assumptions used are appropriate, differences in actual experience or significant changes in assumptions would affect its pension and other postretirement benefits costs and obligations.
Key elements in determining the Company's pension and other postretirement benefit expense are the expected long-term return on plan assets and the discount rate used to measure the benefit plan obligations and the periodic benefit plan expense for future periods. The expected long-term return on pension and other postretirement benefit plan assets is based on the Company's investment strategy, historical experience, and expectations for long-term rates of return that consider external actuarial advice. The Company determines the long-term return on plan assets by applying the long-term rate of expected returns on various asset classes to the Company's target asset allocation. For purposes of determining its liability related to the pension and other postretirement benefit plans, the Company discounts the future related cash flows using a single-point discount rate developed from the weighted average of market-observed yields for high quality fixed income securities with maturities that correspond to expected benefit payments. For 2015 and prior years, the Company computed the interest cost component of its net periodic pension and other postretirement benefit plan expense using the same single-point discount rate. Beginning in 2016, the Company adopted a full yield curve approach for calculating the interest cost component whereby the discount rate for each year is applied to the liability for that specific year. As a result, the interest cost component of net periodic pension and other postretirement benefit plan expense decreased by approximately $4 million in 2016.
A 25 basis point change in any significant assumption (discount rate, salaries, or long-term return on plan assets) would result in a $2 million or less change in total annual benefit expense and a $25 million or less change in projected obligations.
See Note 2 to the financial statements for additional information regarding pension and other postretirement benefits.
Allowance for Funds Used During Construction
In accordance with regulatory treatment, the Company records AFUDC, which represents the estimated debt and equity costs of capital funds that are necessary to finance the construction of new regulated facilities. While cash is not realized currently from such allowance, AFUDC increases the revenue requirement over the service life of the plant through a higher rate base and higher depreciation. The equity component of AFUDC is not included in the calculation of taxable income. The average annual AFUDC rate was 6.7%, 6.5%, and 5.99% for the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016, and 2015, respectively. The AFUDC rate is applied to CWIP consistent with jurisdictional regulatory treatment. AFUDC equity was $72 million, $124 million, and $110 million in 2017, 2016, and 2015, respectively. The decrease in 2017 resulted from the Kemper County energy facility project suspension in June 2017.
Unbilled Revenues
Revenues related to the retail sale of electricity are recorded when electricity is delivered to customers. However, the determination of KWH sales to individual customers is based on the reading of their meters, which is performed on a systematic basis throughout the month. At the end of each month, amounts of electricity delivered to customers, but not yet metered and billed, are estimated. Components of the unbilled revenue estimates include total KWH territorial supply, total KWH billed, estimated total electricity lost in delivery, and customer usage. These components can fluctuate as a result of a number of factors including weather, generation patterns, power delivery volume, and other operational constraints. These factors can be unpredictable and can vary from historical trends. As a result, the overall estimate of unbilled revenues could be significantly affected, which could have a material impact on the Company's results of operations.

MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS (continued)
Mississippi Power Company 2017 Annual Report

Contingent Obligations
The Company is subject to a number of federal and state laws and regulations as well as other factors and conditions that subject it to environmental, litigation, income tax, and other risks. See FUTURE EARNINGS POTENTIAL herein and Note 3 to the financial statements for more information regarding certain of these contingencies. The Company periodically evaluates its exposure to such risks and records reserves for those matters where a non-tax-related loss is considered probable and reasonably estimable and records a tax asset or liability if it is more likely than not that a tax position will be sustained. The adequacy of reserves can be significantly affected by external events or conditions that can be unpredictable; thus, the ultimate outcome of such matters could materially affect the Company's results of operations, cash flows, or financial condition.
Recently Issued Accounting Standards
Revenue
In 2014, the FASB issued ASC 606, Revenue from Contracts with Customers (ASC 606), replacing the existing accounting standard and industry specific guidance for revenue recognition with a five-step model for recognizing and measuring revenue from contracts with customers. The underlying principle of the new standard is to recognize revenue to depict the transfer of goods or services to customers at the amount expected to be collected. The new standard also requires enhanced disclosures regarding the nature, amount, timing, and uncertainty of revenue and the related cash flows arising from contracts with customers.
Most of the Company's revenue, including energy provided to customers, is from tariff offerings that provide electricity without a defined contractual term, as well as longer-term contractual commitments, including PPAs.
The Company has completed the evaluation of all revenue streams and determined that the adoption of ASC 606 will not change the current timing of revenue recognition for such transactions. Some revenue arrangements, such as energy-related derivatives and alternative revenue programs, are excluded from the scope of ASC 606 and, therefore, will be accounted for and disclosed or presented separately from revenues under ASC 606 on the Company's financial statements, if material. The Company has concluded contributions in aid of construction are not in scope for ASC 606 and will continue to be accounted for as an offset to property, plant, and equipment.
The new standard is effective for reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2017. The Company applied the modified retrospective method of adoption effective January 1, 2018. The Company also utilized practical expedients which allowed it to apply the standard to open contracts at the date of adoption and to reflect the aggregate effect of all modifications when identifying performance obligations and allocating the transaction price for contracts modified before the effective date. Under the modified retrospective method of adoption, prior year reported results are not restated; however, a cumulative-effect adjustment to retained earnings at January 1, 2018 is recorded. In addition, quarterly disclosures will include comparative information on 2018 financial statement line items under current guidance. The adoption of ASC 606 did not result in a cumulative-effect adjustment.
Leases
In February 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-02, Leases (Topic 842) (ASU 2016-02). ASU 2016-02 requires lessees to recognize on the balance sheet a lease liability and a right-of-use asset for all leases. ASU 2016-02 also changes the recognition, measurement, and presentation of expense associated with leases and provides clarification regarding the identification of certain components of contracts that would represent a lease. The accounting required by lessors is relatively unchanged. ASU 2016-02 is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2018 and the Company will adopt the new standard effective January 1, 2019.
The Company is currently implementing an information technology system along with the related changes to internal controls and accounting policies that will support the accounting for leases under ASU 2016-02. In addition, the Company has substantially completed a detailed inventory and analysis of its leases. In terms of rental charges and duration of contracts, the most significant leases relate to equipment and cellular towers where the Company is the lessee and to equipment where the Company is the lessor. The Company is currently analyzing pole attachment agreements and a lease determination has not been made at this time. While the Company has not yet determined the ultimate impact, adoption of ASU 2016-02 is expected to have a significant impact on the Company's balance sheet.
Other
On March 10, 2017, the FASB issued ASU No. 2017-07, Compensation – Retirement Benefits (Topic 715): Improving the Presentation of Net Periodic Pension Cost and Net Periodic Postretirement Benefit Cost (ASU 2017-07). ASU 2017-07 requires that an employer report the service cost component in the same line item or items as other compensation costs and requires the other components of net periodic pension and postretirement benefit costs to be separately presented in the income statement

MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS (continued)
Mississippi Power Company 2017 Annual Report

outside of income from operations. Additionally, only the service cost component is eligible for capitalization, when applicable. However, all cost components remain eligible for capitalization under FERC regulations. ASU 2017-07 will be applied retrospectively for the presentation of the service cost component and the other components of net periodic pension and postretirement benefit costs in the income statement. The capitalization of only the service cost component of net periodic pension and postretirement benefit costs in assets will be applied on a prospective basis. ASU 2017-07 is effective for periods beginning after December 15, 2017. The presentation changes required for net periodic pension and postretirement benefit costs will result in a decrease in the Company's operating income and an increase in other income for 2016 and 2017 and are expected to result in a decrease in operating income and an increase in other income for 2018. The Company adopted ASU 2017-07 effective January 1, 2018 with no material impact on its financial statements.
On August 28, 2017, the FASB issued ASU No. 2017-12, Derivatives and Hedging (Topic 815): Targeted Improvements to Accounting for Hedging Activities (ASU 2017-12), amending the hedge accounting recognition and presentation requirements. ASU 2017-12 makes more financial and non-financial hedging strategies eligible for hedge accounting, amends the related presentation and disclosure requirements, and simplifies hedge effectiveness assessment requirements. ASU 2017-12 is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2018, with early adoption permitted. The Company adopted ASU 2017-12 effective January 1, 2018 with no material impact on its financial statements.
FINANCIAL CONDITION AND LIQUIDITY
Overview and Sources of Capital
Earnings for all periods presented were negatively affected by charges associated with the Kemper IGCC. See FUTURE EARNINGS POTENTIAL – "Kemper County Energy Facility" herein and Note 3 to the financial statements for additional information.
The Company's cash requirements primarily consist of funding ongoing operations, capital expenditures, and debt maturities. Capital expenditures and other investing activities include investments to maintain existing generation facilities, to comply with environmental regulations including adding environmental modifications to certain existing generating units, to expand and improve transmission and distribution facilities, and for restoration following major storms.
The Company's financial statement presentation contemplates continuation of the Company as a going concern as a result of Southern Company's anticipated ongoing financial support of the Company. Specifically, the Company has been informed by Southern Company that in the event sufficient funds are not available from external sources, Southern Company intends to provide the Company with loans and/or equity contributions sufficient to fund the remaining indebtedness scheduled to mature and other cash needs over the next 12 months. For additional information, see Note 6 to the financial statements under "Going Concern."
On February 28, 2017, the maturity dates for $551 million in promissory notes to Southern Company were extended to July 31, 2018. In the second quarter 2017, the Company borrowed an additional $40 million under a promissory note issued to Southern Company. In June 2017, Southern Company made equity contributions totaling $1.0 billion to the Company. The Company used a portion of the proceeds to (i) prepay $300 million of the outstanding principal amount under its $1.2 billion unsecured term loan; (ii) repay all of the $591 million outstanding principal amount of promissory notes to Southern Company; and (iii) repay $10 million of the outstanding principal amount of bank loans.
In September 2017, the Company issued a floating rate promissory note to Southern Company in an aggregate principal amount of up to $150 million bearing interest based on one-month LIBOR. The Company borrowed $109 million under this promissory note primarily to satisfy its federal income tax obligations for the quarter ended September 30, 2017 and subsequently repaid the promissory note upon receipt of its income tax refund from the U.S. government related to the settlement concerning deductible R&E expenditures. See Note 5 to the financial statements under "Section 174 Research and Experimental Deduction" for additional information.
As of December 31, 2017, the Company's current liabilities exceeded current assets by approximately $911 million primarily due to a $900 million unsecured term loan that matures on March 31, 2018. The Company expects to refinance the unsecured term loan with external security issuances and/or borrowings from financial institutions or Southern Company. To fund the Company's capital needs over the next 12 months, the Company intends to utilize operating cash flows, external security issuances, lines of credit, bank term loans, equity contributions from Southern Company, and, to the extent necessary, loans from Southern Company.
The Company's capital expenditures and debt maturities are expected to materially exceed operating cash flows through 2022. The Company plans to obtain the funds required for construction and other purposes from operating cash flows, lines of credit,

MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS (continued)
Mississippi Power Company 2017 Annual Report

bank term loans, external security issuances, commercial paper, to the extent the Company is eligible to participate, and loans and/or equity contributions from Southern Company.
The Company's investments in the qualified pension plan increased in value as of December 31, 2017 as compared to December 31, 2016. No contributions to the qualified pension plan were made for the year ended December 31, 2017 and no mandatory contributions to the qualified pension plan are anticipated during 2018.
Net cash provided from operating activities totaled $503 million for 2017, an increase of $274 million as compared to 2016. The increase in cash provided from operating activities in 2017 was primarily due to tax refunds associated with the approval by the JCT of the Section 174 R&E settlement, largely offset by a decrease in income taxes related to the Kemper County energy facility and Tax Reform Legislation. Net cash provided from operating activities totaled $229 million for 2016, an increase of $56 million as compared to 2015. The increase in cash provided from operating activities in 2016 was primarily due to repayment in 2015 of ITCs relating to the Kemper County energy facility, as well as the 2015 mirror CWIP refund, partially offset by lower income tax benefits related to the Kemper County energy facility in 2016 and lower fuel rates in 2016.
Net cash used for investing activities in 2017, 2016, and 2015 totaled $504 million, $697 million, and $906 million, respectively. The cash used for investing activities in all years presented was primarily due to gross property additions related to the Kemper County energy facility. The cash used for investing activities in 2016 was partially offset by the receipt of Additional DOE Grants. The cash used for investing activities in 2015 also included gross property additions related to the Plant Daniel scrubber project.
Net cash provided from financing activities totaled $25 million in 2017 primarily due to capital contributions from Southern Company, largely offset by redemptions of long-term debt and short-term borrowings. Net cash provided from financing activities totaled $594 million in 2016 primarily due to long-term debt financings and capital contributions from Southern Company, partially offset by a decrease in short-term borrowings and redemptions of long-term debt. Net cash provided from financing activities totaled $698 million in 2015 primarily due to short-term borrowings, capital contributions from Southern Company, and long-term debt financings, partially offset by redemptions of long-term debt.
Significant balance sheet changes as of December 31, 2017 compared to 2016 include decreases of $2.5 billion in CWIP, a net change of $1.0 billion in accumulated deferred income taxes, an increase in paid-in capital of $1.0 billion due to capital contributions from Southern Company, a portion of which was used to repay $300 million of securities due within one year, $591 million of long-term debt, and $10 million of short-term debt. Long-term debt decreased primarily due to the reclassification of $1.2 billion in unsecured term loans to securities due within one year – other. Securities due within one year – parent decreased $551 million due to the repayment of promissory notes to Southern Company. Other significant balance sheet changes include $326 million in deferred charges related to income taxes. All of these changes primarily resulted from the Kemper IGCC suspension and related estimated loss. Income taxes receivable and unrecognized tax benefits also decreased due to tax refunds associated with the approval by the JCT of the Section 174 R&E settlement. The Company also had an increase of $365 million in deferred credits related to income taxes primarily resulting from the impacts of Tax Reform Legislation. See FUTURE EARNINGS POTENTIAL – "Kemper County Energy Facility" and "Income Tax Matters – Federal Tax Reform Legislation" herein and Notes 3 and 5 to the financial statements under "Kemper County Energy Facility" and "Section 174 Research and Experimental Deduction," respectively, for additional information.
The Company's ratio of common equity to total capitalization plus short-term debt was 39% and 49% at December 31, 2017 and 2016, respectively. The decrease was due to Kemper IGCC losses. See Note 6 to the financial statements for additional information.
The issuance of securities by the Company is subject to regulatory approval by the FERC. Additionally, with respect to the public offering of securities, the Company files registration statements with the SEC under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended. The amounts of securities authorized by the FERC are continuously monitored and appropriate filings are made to ensure flexibility in raising capital. Any future financing through secured debt would also require approval by the Mississippi PSC.
The Southern Company system does not maintain a centralized cash or money pool. Therefore, funds of the Company are not commingled with funds of any other company in the Southern Company system.
At December 31, 2017, the Company had approximately $248 million of cash and cash equivalents. Committed credit arrangements with banks at December 31, 2017 were $100 million, all of which is unused. In November 2017, the Company amended its one-year credit arrangements in an aggregate amount of $100 million to extend the maturity dates from 2017 to 2018.
A portion of the $100 million unused credit arrangements with banks is allocated to provide liquidity support to the Company's revenue bonds. The amount of variable rate revenue bonds outstanding requiring liquidity support as of December 31, 2017 was approximately $40 million. In addition, the Company had approximately $50 million of fixed rate revenue bonds that were remarketed from a long-term interest rate mode to an index rate mode subsequent to December 31, 2017.

MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS (continued)
Mississippi Power Company 2017 Annual Report

Most of these bank credit arrangements, as well as the Company's term loan agreement, contain covenants that limit debt levels and typically contain cross acceleration to other indebtedness (including guarantee obligations) of the Company. Such cross-acceleration provisions to other indebtedness would trigger an event of default if the Company defaulted on indebtedness, the payment of which was then accelerated. At December 31, 2017, the Company was in compliance with all such covenants. None of the bank credit arrangements contain material adverse change clauses at the time of borrowing.
Subject to applicable market conditions, the Company expects to seek to renew or replace its credit arrangements as needed, prior to expiration. In connection therewith, the Company may extend the maturity dates and/or increase or decrease the lending commitments thereunder.
See Note 6 to the financial statements under "Bank Credit Arrangements" for additional information.
Short-term borrowings are included in notes payable in the balance sheets. Details of short-term borrowing were as follows:
 Short-term Debt at the End of the Period 
Short-term Debt During the Period (*)
 Amount Outstanding Weighted Average Interest Rate Average Outstanding Weighted Average Interest Rate Maximum Amount Outstanding
 (in millions)   (in millions)   (in millions)
December 31, 2017$4
 3.8% $18
 3.0% $36
December 31, 2016$23
 2.6% $112
 2.0% $500
December 31, 2015$500
 1.4% $372
 1.3% $515
(*)Average and maximum amounts are based upon daily balances during the 12-month periods ended December 31.
Financing Activities
In addition to any financings that may be necessary to meet capital requirements and contractual obligations, the Company plans, when economically feasible, to retire higher-cost securities and replace these obligations with lower-cost capital if market conditions permit.
Bank Term Loans and Senior Notes
In March 2017, the Company issued a $9 million short-term bank note bearing interest at 5% per annum, which was repaid in April 2017.
In June 2017, the Company used a portion of the proceeds from Southern Company equity contributions to prepay $300 million of the outstanding principal amount under its $1.2 billion unsecured term loan, which matures on March 30, 2018, and to repay $10 million of the outstanding principal amount of bank loans. See "Parent Company Loans and Equity Contributions" herein for more information.
This unsecured term loan has covenants that limit debt levels to 65% of total capitalization, as defined in the agreement. For purposes of this definition, debt excludes the long-term debt payable to affiliated trusts and other hybrid securities. In addition, this unsecured term loan contains cross-acceleration provisions to other debt (including guarantee obligations) that would be triggered if the Company defaulted on debt above a specified threshold, the payment of which was then accelerated. The Company is currently in compliance with all such covenants.
In August 2017, the Company repaid a $12.5 million short-term bank note.
In November 2017, the Company repaid at maturity $35 million aggregate principal amount of Series 2007A 5.60% Senior Notes.
Parent Company Loans and Equity Contributions
In February 2017, the Company amended $551 million in promissory notes to Southern Company extending the maturity dates of the notes from December 1, 2017 to July 31, 2018. In the second quarter 2017, the Company borrowed an additional $40 million under a promissory note issued to Southern Company.
In June 2017, Southern Company made equity contributions totaling $1.0 billion to the Company. The Company used a portion of the proceeds to (i) prepay $300 million of the outstanding principal amount under its $1.2 billion unsecured term loan, which matures on March 30, 2018; (ii) repay all of the $591 million outstanding principal amount of promissory notes to Southern Company; and (iii) repay a $10 million short-term bank loan.

MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS (continued)
Mississippi Power Company 2017 Annual Report

In September 2017, the Company issued a floating rate promissory note to Southern Company in an aggregate principal amount of up to $150 million bearing interest based on one-month LIBOR. The Company borrowed $109 million under this promissory note primarily to satisfy its federal income tax obligations for the quarter ending September 30, 2017 and subsequently repaid the promissory note upon receipt of its income tax refund from the U.S. federal government related to the settlement concerning deductible R&E expenditures. See Note 5 to the financial statements under "Section 174 Research and Experimental Deduction" for additional information.
Credit Rating Risk
At December 31, 2017, the Company does not have any credit arrangements that would require material changes in payment schedules or terminations as a result of a credit rating downgrade.
On October 4, 2017, the Company executed agreements with its largest retail customer, Chevron, to continue providing retail service to the Chevron refinery in Pascagoula, Mississippi through 2038. The agreements grant Chevron a security interest in the co-generation assets, with a net book value of approximately $93 million, located at the refinery that is exercisable upon the occurrence of (i) certain bankruptcy events or (ii) other events of default coupled with specific reductions in steam output at the facility and a downgrade of the Company's credit rating to below investment grade by two of the three rating agencies.
There are certain contracts that have required or could require collateral, but not accelerated payment, in the event of a credit rating change to BBB and/or Baa2 or below. These contracts are for physical electricity purchases and sales, fuel transportation and storage, energy price risk management, and transmission. At December 31, 2017, the maximum amount of potential collateral requirements under these contracts at a rating of BBB and/or Baa2 or BBB- and/or Baa3 was not material. The maximum potential collateral requirements at a rating below BBB- and/or Baa3 equaled approximately $241 million.
Included in these amounts are certain agreements that could require collateral in the event that Alabama Power or Georgia Power has a credit rating change to below investment grade. Generally, collateral may be provided by a Southern Company guaranty, letter of credit, or cash. Additionally, a credit rating downgrade could impact the ability of the Company to access capital markets, or at a minimum the cost at which it does so.
On March 1, 2017, Moody's downgraded the senior unsecured debt rating of the Company to Ba1 from Baa3.
On March 24, 2017, S&P revised its consolidated credit rating outlook for Southern Company and its subsidiaries (including the Company) from stable to negative.
On March 30, 2017, Fitch placed the ratings of the Company on rating watch negative.
On June 22, 2017, Moody's placed the ratings of the Company on review for downgrade. On September 21, 2017, Moody's revised its rating outlook for the Company from under review to stable.
While it is unclear how the credit rating agencies, the FERC, and the Mississippi PSC may respond to the Tax Reform Legislation, certain financial metrics, such as the funds from operations to debt percentage, used by the credit rating agencies to assess Southern Company and its subsidiaries, including the Company, may be negatively impacted. Absent actions by Southern Company and its subsidiaries, including the Company, to mitigate the resulting impacts, which, among other alternatives, could include adjusting capital structure and/or monetizing regulatory assets, the Company's credit ratings could be negatively affected. See Note 3 to the financial statements under "Retail Regulatory Matters" for additional information.
Market Price Risk
Due to cost-based rate regulation and other various cost recovery mechanisms, the Company continues to have limited exposure to market volatility in interest rates, commodity fuel prices, and prices of electricity. To manage the volatility attributable to these exposures, the Company nets the exposures, where possible, to take advantage of natural offsets and enters into various derivative transactions for the remaining exposures pursuant to the Company's policies in areas such as counterparty exposure and risk management practices. The Company's policy is that derivatives are to be used primarily for hedging purposes and mandates strict adherence to all applicable risk management policies. Derivative positions are monitored using techniques that include, but are not limited to, market valuation, value at risk, stress testing, and sensitivity analysis.
To mitigate future exposure to a change in interest rates, the Company may enter into derivatives that have been designated as hedges. The weighted average interest rate on $40 million of long-term variable interest rate exposure at December 31, 2017 was 2.49%. If the Company sustained a 100 basis point change in interest rates for all long-term variable interest rate exposure, the change would have an immaterial effect on annualized interest expense at December 31, 2017. See Note 1 to the financial statements under "Financial Instruments" and Note 10 to the financial statements for additional information.

MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS (continued)
Mississippi Power Company 2017 Annual Report

To mitigate residual risks relative to movements in electricity prices, the Company enters into physical fixed-price contracts for the purchase and sale of electricity through the wholesale electricity market and, to a lesser extent, financial hedge contracts for natural gas purchases. The Company continues to manage retail fuel-hedging programs implemented per the guidelines of the Mississippi PSC and wholesale fuel-hedging programs under agreements with wholesale customers. The Company had no material change in market risk exposure for the year ended December 31, 2017 when compared to the year ended December 31, 2016.
The changes in fair value of energy-related derivative contracts are substantially attributable to both the volume and the price of natural gas. For the years ended December 31, the changes in fair value of energy-related derivative contracts, the majority of which are composed of regulatory hedges, were as follows:
 
2017
Changes
 
2016
Changes
 Fair Value
 (in millions)
Contracts outstanding at the beginning of the period, assets (liabilities), net$(7) $(47)
Contracts realized or settled8
 29
Current period changes(*)
(8) 11
Contracts outstanding at the end of the period, assets (liabilities), net$(7) $(7)
(*)Current period changes also include the changes in fair value of new contracts entered into during the period, if any.
The net hedge volumes of energy-related derivative contracts, all of which are natural gas swaps, for the years ended December 31 were as follows:
 2017 2016
 mmBtu Volume
 (in millions)
Total hedge volume53
 36
For natural gas hedges, the weighted average swap contract cost above market prices was approximately $0.14 per mmBtu as of December 31, 2017 and $0.19 per mmBtu as of December 31, 2016. The options outstanding were immaterial for the reporting periods presented. The costs associated with natural gas hedges are recovered through the Company's ECMs.
At December 31, 2017 and 2016, substantially all of the Company's energy-related derivative contracts were designated as regulatory hedges and were related to the Company's fuel-hedging program. Therefore, gains and losses are initially recorded as regulatory liabilities and assets, respectively, and then are included in fuel expense as they are recovered through the ECM clause.
The Company uses over-the-counter contracts that are not exchange traded but are fair valued using prices which are market observable, and thus fall into Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy. See Note 9 to the financial statements for further discussion of fair value measurements. The maturities of the energy-related derivative contracts, which are all Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy, at December 31, 2017 were as follows:
 
Fair Value Measurements
December 31, 2017
 Total Maturity
 Fair Value Year 1 Years 2&3 
 (in millions)
Level 1$
 $
 $
Level 2(7) (5) (2)
Level 3
 
 
Fair value of contracts outstanding at end of period$(7) $(5) $(2)
The Company is exposed to market price risk in the event of nonperformance by counterparties to the energy-related derivative contracts. The Company only enters into agreements and material transactions with counterparties that have investment grade credit ratings by Moody's and S&P or with counterparties who have posted collateral to cover potential credit exposure.

MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS (continued)
Mississippi Power Company 2017 Annual Report

Therefore, the Company does not anticipate market risk exposure from nonperformance by the counterparties. For additional information, see Note 1 to the financial statements under "Financial Instruments" and Note 10 to the financial statements.
Capital Requirements and Contractual Obligations
Approximately $900 million will be required through December 31, 2018 to fund maturities of long-term debt. In addition, the Company has $40 million of tax-exempt variable rate demand obligations that are supported by short-term credit facilities and $50 million of fixed rate revenue bonds that were remarketed from a long-term interest rate mode to an index rate mode subsequent to December 31, 2017. See "Overview and Sources of Capital" herein for additional information.
The construction program of the Company is currently estimated to be $213 million for 2018, $199 million for 2019, $193 million for 2020, $167 million for 2021, and $118 million for 2022. These estimated program amounts also include capital expenditures covered under long-term service agreements. Estimated capital expenditures to comply with environmental laws and regulations included in these amounts are $14 million, $16 million, $17 million, $13 million, and $3 million for 2018, 2019, 2020, 2021, and 2022, respectively. These estimated expenditures do not include any potential compliance costs associated with the regulation of CO2 emissions from fossil fuel-fired electric generating units. See FUTURE EARNINGS POTENTIAL – "Environmental Matters – Environmental Laws and Regulations" and "– Global Climate Issues" herein for additional information.
The Company also anticipates costs associated with closure and monitoring of ash ponds in accordance with the CCR Rule, which are reflected in the Company's ARO liabilities. These costs, which could change as the Company continues to refine its assumptions underlying the cost estimates and evaluate the method and timing of compliance activities, are estimated to be $23 million, $7 million, $7 million, $9 million, and $12 million for the years 2018, 2019, 2020, 2021, and 2022, respectively. See Note 1 to the financial statements under "Asset Retirement Obligations and Other Costs of Removal" for additional information.
The construction program is subject to periodic review and revision, and actual construction costs may vary from these estimates because of numerous factors. These factors include: changes in business conditions; changes in load projections; storm impacts; changes in environmental laws and regulations; the outcome of any legal challenges to the environmental rules; changes in generating plants, including unit retirements and replacements and adding or changing fuel sources at existing electric generating units, to meet regulatory requirements; changes in FERC rules and regulations; Mississippi PSC approvals; changes in the expected environmental compliance program; changes in legislation; the cost and efficiency of construction labor, equipment, and materials; project scope and design changes; and the cost of capital. In addition, there can be no assurance that costs related to capital expenditures will be fully recovered.
In addition, as discussed in Note 2 to the financial statements, the Company provides postretirement benefits to substantially all employees and funds trusts to the extent required by the FERC.
Other funding requirements related to obligations associated with scheduled maturities of long-term debt, as well as the related interest, derivative obligations, preferred stock dividends, unrecognized tax benefits, pension and other post-retirement benefit plans, leases, and other purchase commitments are detailed in the contractual obligations table that follows. See Notes 1, 2, 5, 6, 7, and 10 to the financial statements for additional information.

MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS (continued)
Mississippi Power Company 2017 Annual Report

Contractual Obligations
Contractual obligations at December 31, 2017 were as follows:
 2018 2019-2020 2021-2022 
After
2022
 Total
 (in millions)
Long-term debt(a) —
         
Principal$990
 $125
 $270
 $673
 $2,058
Interest86
 106
 79
 552
 823
Preferred stock dividends(b)
2
 3
 3
 
 8
Financial derivative obligations(c)
6
 3
 
 
 9
Operating leases(d)
3
 5
 4
 7
 19
Purchase commitments —         
Capital(e)
213
 379
 269
 
 861
Fuel(f)
280
 329
 191
 175
 975
Long-term service agreements(g)
33
 75
 49
 245
 402
Purchased power(h)
11
 29
 36
 454
 530
Pension and other postretirement benefits plans(i)
7
 15
 
 
 22
Total$1,631
 $1,069
 $901
 $2,106
 $5,707
(a)
All amounts are reflected based on final maturity dates except for amounts related to certain revenue bonds. The Company plans to continue, when economically feasible, to retire higher-cost securities and replace these obligations with lower-cost capital if market conditions permit. Variable rate interest obligations are estimated based on rates as of December 31, 2017, as reflected in the statements of capitalization. Fixed rates include, where applicable, the effects of interest rate derivatives employed to manage interest rate risk. Long-term debt excludes capital lease amounts (shown separately). For additional information, see Note 6 to the financial statements.
(b)Preferred stock does not mature; therefore, amounts are provided for the next five years only.
(c)
Derivative obligations are for energy-related derivatives. For additional information, see Notes 1 and 10 to the financial statements.
(d)See Note 7 to the financial statements for additional information.
(e)
The Company provides estimated capital expenditures for a five-year period, including capital expenditures associated with environmental regulations. At December 31, 2017, significant purchase commitments were outstanding in connection with the construction program. These amounts exclude capital expenditures covered under long-term service agreements, which are reflected separately. See FUTURE EARNINGS POTENTIAL – "Environmental Matters" for additional information.
(f)Fuel commitments include coal and natural gas purchases, as well as the related transportation and storage. In most cases, these contracts contain provisions for price escalation, minimum purchase levels, and other financial commitments. Natural gas purchase commitments are based on various indices at the time of delivery. Amounts reflected for natural gas purchase commitments have been estimated based on the New York Mercantile Exchange future prices at December 31, 2017.
(g)Long-term service agreements include price escalation based on inflation indices.
(h)Purchased power represents estimated minimum long-term commitments for the purchase of solar energy. Energy costs associated with solar PPAs are recovered through the fuel clause. See Notes 3 and 7 to the financial statements for additional information.
(i)The Company forecasts contributions to the pension and other postretirement benefit plans over a three-year period. The Company anticipates no mandatory contributions to the qualified pension plan during the next three years. Amounts presented represent estimated benefit payments for the nonqualified pension plans, estimated non-trust benefit payments for the other postretirement benefit plans, and estimated contributions to the other postretirement benefit plan trusts, all of which will be made from the Company's corporate assets. See Note 2 to the financial statements for additional information related to the pension and other postretirement benefit plans, including estimated benefit payments. Certain benefit payments will be made through the related benefit plans. Other benefit payments will be made from the Company's corporate assets.

MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS (continued)
Mississippi Power Company 2017 Annual Report

Cautionary Statement Regarding Forward-Looking Statements
The Company's 2017 Annual Report contains forward-looking statements. Forward-looking statements include, among other things, statements concerning retail rates, customer and sales growth, economic conditions, fuel and environmental cost recovery and other rate actions, current and proposed environmental regulations and related compliance plans and estimated expenditures, pending or potential litigation matters, access to sources of capital, projections for the qualified pension plan and postretirement benefit plans contributions, financing activities, filings with state and federal regulatory authorities, impacts of the Tax Reform Legislation, federal income tax benefits, estimated sales and purchases under power sale and purchase agreements, storm damage cost recovery and repairs, and estimated construction and other plans and expenditures. In some cases, forward-looking statements can be identified by terminology such as "may," "will," "could," "should," "expects," "plans," "anticipates," "believes," "estimates," "projects," "predicts," "potential," or "continue" or the negative of these terms or other similar terminology. There are various factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from those suggested by the forward-looking statements; accordingly, there can be no assurance that such indicated results will be realized. These factors include:
the impact of recent and future federal and state regulatory changes, including environmental laws and regulations governing air, water, land, and protection of other natural resources, and also changes in tax and other laws and regulations to which the Company is subject, as well as changes in application of existing laws and regulations;
the uncertainty surrounding the recently enacted Tax Reform Legislation, including implementing regulations and IRS interpretations, actions that may be taken in response by regulatory authorities, and its impact, if any, on the credit ratings of the Company;
current and future litigation or regulatory investigations, proceedings, or inquiries;
the effects, extent, and timing of the entry of additional competition in the markets in which the Company operates;
variations in demand for electricity, including those relating to weather, the general economy, population and business growth (and declines), the effects of energy conservation and efficiency measures, including from the development and deployment of alternative energy sources such as self-generation and distributed generation technologies, and any potential economic impacts resulting from federal fiscal decisions;
available sources and costs of fuels;
effects of inflation;
the ability to control costs and avoid cost overruns during the development and construction of facilities, to construct facilities in accordance with the requirements of permits and licenses, and to satisfy any environmental performance standards, including the requirements of any tax incentives;
investment performance of the Company's employee and retiree benefit plans;
advances in technology;
state and federal rate regulations and the impact of pending and future rate cases and negotiations, including rate actions relating to fuel and other cost recovery mechanisms;
the ability to successfully operate generating, transmission, and distribution facilities and the successful performance of necessary corporate functions;
litigation related to the Kemper County energy facility;
internal restructuring or other restructuring options that may be pursued;
potential business strategies, including acquisitions or dispositions of assets or businesses, which cannot be assured to be completed or beneficial to the Company;
the ability of counterparties of the Company to make payments as and when due and to perform as required;
the ability to obtain new short- and long-term contracts with wholesale customers;
the direct or indirect effect on the Company's business resulting from cyber intrusion or physical attack and the threat of physical attacks;
interest rate fluctuations and financial market conditions and the results of financing efforts;
changes in the Company's credit ratings, including impacts on interest rates, access to capital markets, and collateral requirements;
the impacts of any sovereign financial issues, including impacts on interest rates, access to capital markets, impacts on foreign currency exchange rates, counterparty performance, and the economy in general;
the ability of the Company to obtain additional generating capacity (or sell excess generating capacity) at competitive prices;

MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS (continued)
Mississippi Power Company 2017 Annual Report

catastrophic events such as fires, earthquakes, explosions, floods, tornadoes, hurricanes and other storms, droughts, pandemic health events such as influenzas, or other similar occurrences;
the direct or indirect effects on the Company's business resulting from incidents affecting the U.S. electric grid or operation of generating resources;
the effect of accounting pronouncements issued periodically by standard-setting bodies; and
other factors discussed elsewhere herein and in other reports filed by the Company from time to time with the SEC.
The Company expressly disclaims any obligation to update any forward-looking statements.


STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
For the Years Ended December 31, 20172018, 20162017, and 20152016
Mississippi Power Company 20172018 Annual Report

2017 2016 20152018
 2017
 2016
(in millions)(in millions)
Operating Revenues:          
Retail revenues$854
 $859
 $776
$889
 $854
 $859
Wholesale revenues, non-affiliates259
 261
 270
263
 259
 261
Wholesale revenues, affiliates56
 26
 76
91
 56
 26
Other revenues18
 17
 16
22
 18
 17
Total operating revenues1,187
 1,163
 1,138
1,265
 1,187
 1,163
Operating Expenses:          
Fuel395
 343
 443
405
 395
 343
Purchased power25
 34
 12
41
 25
 34
Other operations and maintenance282
 312
 274
313
 291
 317
Depreciation and amortization161
 132
 123
169
 161
 132
Taxes other than income taxes104
 109
 94
107
 104
 109
Estimated loss on Kemper IGCC3,362
 428
 365
37
 3,362
 428
Total operating expenses4,329
 1,358
 1,311
1,072
 4,338
 1,363
Operating Loss(3,142) (195) (173)
Operating Income (Loss)193
 (3,151) (200)
Other Income and (Expense):          
Allowance for equity funds used during construction72
 124
 110

 72
 124
Interest expense, net of amounts capitalized(42) (74) (7)(76) (42) (74)
Other income (expense), net(8) (7) (8)17
 1
 (2)
Total other income and (expense)22
 43
 95
(59) 31
 48
Loss Before Income Taxes(3,120) (152) (78)
Earnings (Loss) Before Income Taxes134
 (3,120) (152)
Income taxes (benefit)(532) (104) (72)(102) (532) (104)
Net Loss(2,588) (48) (6)
Net Income (Loss)236
 (2,588) (48)
Dividends on Preferred Stock2
 2
 2
1
 2
 2
Net Loss After Dividends on Preferred Stock$(2,590) $(50) $(8)
Net Income (Loss) After Dividends on Preferred Stock$235
 $(2,590) $(50)
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
    Table of Contents                                Index to Financial Statements

STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (LOSS)
For the Years Ended December 31, 20172018, 20162017, and 20152016
Mississippi Power Company 20172018 Annual Report

 2017 2016 2015
 (in millions)
Net Loss$(2,588) $(48) $(6)
Other comprehensive income (loss):     
Qualifying hedges:     
Changes in fair value, net of tax of $(1), $1, and $-,
respectively
(1) 1
 
Reclassification adjustment for amounts included in net income,
net of tax of $1, $1, and $1, respectively
1
 1
 1
Total other comprehensive income (loss)
 2
 1
Comprehensive Loss$(2,588) $(46) $(5)
 2018
 2017
 2016
 (in millions)
Net Income (Loss)$236
 $(2,588) $(48)
Other comprehensive income (loss):     
Qualifying hedges:     
Changes in fair value, net of tax of $(1), $(1), and $1,
respectively
(1) (1) 1
Reclassification adjustment for amounts included in net income,
net of tax of $-, $1, and $1, respectively
1
 1
 1
Total other comprehensive income (loss)
 
 2
Comprehensive Income (Loss)$236
 $(2,588) $(46)
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

    Table of Contents                                Index to Financial Statements

STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
For the Years Ended December 31, 20172018, 20162017, and 20152016
Mississippi Power Company 20172018 Annual Report
 2017 2016 2015
 (in millions)
Operating Activities:     
Net loss$(2,588) $(48) $(6)
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash provided from operating activities —     
Depreciation and amortization, total198
 157
 126
Deferred income taxes(727) (67) 777
Investment tax credits
 
 (210)
Allowance for equity funds used during construction(72) (124) (110)
Pension and postretirement funding
 (47) 
Regulatory assets associated with Kemper IGCC(19) (12) (61)
Estimated loss on Kemper IGCC3,179
 428
 365
Income taxes receivable, non-current
 
 (544)
Other, net(12) (20) 8
Changes in certain current assets and liabilities —     
-Receivables540
 13
 28
-Fossil fuel stock24
 4
 (4)
-Prepaid income taxes
 39
 (35)
-Other current assets(13) (12) (14)
-Accounts payable(3) (14) (34)
-Accrued interest(29) 27
 (2)
-Accrued taxes80
 14
 (11)
-Over recovered regulatory clause revenues(51) (45) 96
-Mirror CWIP
 
 (271)
-Customer liability associated with Kemper refunds(1) (73) 73
-Other current liabilities(3) 9
 2
Net cash provided from operating activities503
 229
 173
Investing Activities:     
Property additions(429) (798) (857)
Construction payables(47) (26) (9)
Government grant proceeds
 137
 
Other investing activities(28) (10) (40)
Net cash used for investing activities(504) (697) (906)
Financing Activities:     
Decrease in notes payable, net(18) 
 
Proceeds —     
Capital contributions from parent company1,002
 627
 277
Long-term debt issuance to parent company40
 200
 275
Other long-term debt
 1,200
 
Short-term borrowings109
 
 505
Redemptions —     
Short-term borrowings(109) (478) (5)
Long-term debt to parent company(591) (225) 
Capital leases(71) (3) (3)
Senior notes(35) (300) 
Other long-term debt(300) (425) (350)
Other financing activities(2) (2) (1)
Net cash provided from financing activities25
 594
 698
Net Change in Cash and Cash Equivalents24
 126
 (35)
Cash and Cash Equivalents at Beginning of Year224
 98
 133
Cash and Cash Equivalents at End of Year$248
 $224
 $98
Supplemental Cash Flow Information:     
Cash paid (received) during the period for —     
Interest (net of $29, $49, and $66 capitalized, respectively)$65
 $50
 $45
Income taxes (net of refunds)(424) (97) (33)
Noncash transactions —     
  Accrued property additions at year-end32
 78
 105
Issuance of promissory note to parent related to repayment of
   interest-bearing refundable deposits and accrued interest

 
 301
 2018
 2017
 2016
 (in millions)
Operating Activities:     
Net income (loss)$236
 $(2,588) $(48)
Adjustments to reconcile net income (loss)
to net cash provided from operating activities —
     
Depreciation and amortization, total177
 198
 157
Deferred income taxes475
 (727) (67)
Allowance for equity funds used during construction
 (72) (124)
Pension and postretirement funding
 
 (47)
Settlement of asset retirement obligations(35) (23) (23)
Estimated loss on Kemper IGCC33
 3,179
 428
Other, net18
 (8) (9)
Changes in certain current assets and liabilities —     
-Receivables(19) 540
 13
-Fossil fuel stock(3) 24
 4
-Prepaid income taxes(12) 
 39
-Other current assets(7) (13) (12)
-Accounts payable15
 (3) (14)
-Accrued interest(1) (29) 27
-Accrued taxes(46) 80
 14
-Over recovered regulatory clause revenues14
 (51) (45)
-Customer liability associated with Kemper refunds
 (1) (73)
-Other current liabilities(41) (3) 9
Net cash provided from operating activities804
 503
 229
Investing Activities:     
Property additions(188) (429) (798)
Construction payables4
 (47) (26)
Government grant proceeds
 
 137
Payments pursuant to LTSAs(29) (10) 10
Other investing activities(19) (18) (20)
Net cash used for investing activities(232) (504) (697)
Financing Activities:     
Decrease in notes payable, net(4) (18) 
Proceeds —     
Capital contributions from parent company15
 1,002
 627
Senior notes600
 
 
Long-term debt issuance to parent company
 40
 200
Other long-term debt
 
 1,200
Short-term borrowings300
 109
 
Redemptions —     
Preferred stock(33) 
 
Pollution control revenue bonds(43) 
 
Short-term borrowings(300) (109) (478)
Long-term debt to parent company
 (591) (225)
Capital leases
 (71) (3)
Senior notes(155) (35) (300)
Other long-term debt(900) (300) (425)
Other financing activities(7) (2) (2)
Net cash provided from (used for) financing activities(527) 25
 594
Net Change in Cash, Cash Equivalents, and Restricted Cash45
 24
 126
Cash, Cash Equivalents, and Restricted Cash at Beginning of Year248
 224
 98
Cash, Cash Equivalents, and Restricted Cash at End of Year$293
 $248
 $224
Supplemental Cash Flow Information:     
Cash paid (received) during the period for —     
Interest (net of $-, $29, and $49 capitalized, respectively)$80
 $65
 $50
Income taxes (net of refunds)(525) (424) (97)
Noncash transactions — Accrued property additions at year-end35
 32
 78
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements. 
    Table of Contents                                Index to Financial Statements

BALANCE SHEETS
At December 31, 20172018 and 20162017
Mississippi Power Company 20172018 Annual Report

Assets2017 20162018
 2017
(in millions)(in millions)
Current Assets:      
Cash and cash equivalents$248
 $224
$293
 $248
Receivables —      
Customer accounts receivable36
 29
34
 36
Unbilled revenues41
 42
41
 41
Income taxes receivable, current4
 544
Affiliated16
 15
21
 16
Other accounts and notes receivable12
 14
31
 16
Fossil fuel stock17
 100
20
 17
Materials and supplies, current44
 76
53
 44
Other regulatory assets, current125
 115
116
 125
Prepaid income taxes12
 
Other current assets9
 8
7
 9
Total current assets552
 1,167
628
 552
Property, Plant, and Equipment:      
In service4,773
 4,865
4,900
 4,773
Less: Accumulated provision for depreciation1,325
 1,289
1,429
 1,325
Plant in service, net of depreciation3,448
 3,576
3,471
 3,448
Construction work in progress84
 2,545
103
 84
Total property, plant, and equipment3,532
 6,121
3,574
 3,532
Other Property and Investments30
 12
24
 30
Deferred Charges and Other Assets:      
Deferred charges related to income taxes35
 361
33
 35
Other regulatory assets, deferred437
 518
474
 437
Accumulated deferred income taxes247
 
150
 247
Other deferred charges and assets33
 56
3
 33
Total deferred charges and other assets752
 935
660
 752
Total Assets$4,866
 $8,235
$4,886
 $4,866
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

    Table of Contents                                Index to Financial Statements

BALANCE SHEETS
At December 31, 20172018 and 20162017
Mississippi Power Company 20172018 Annual Report

Liabilities and Stockholder's Equity2017 20162018
 2017
(in millions)(in millions)
Current Liabilities:      
Securities due within one year —   
Parent$
 $551
Other989
 78
Securities due within one year$40
 $989
Notes payable4
 23

 4
Accounts payable —      
Affiliated59
 62
60
 59
Other96
 135
90
 96
Accrued taxes —      
Accrued income taxes40
 

 40
Other accrued taxes101
 99
95
 101
Unrecognized tax benefits
 383
Accrued interest16
 46
15
 16
Accrued compensation39
 42
38
 39
Accrued plant closure costs29
 35
Asset retirement obligations, current37
 32
34
 37
Over recovered regulatory clause liabilities
 51
14
 
Other current liabilities82
 36
40
 47
Total current liabilities1,463
 1,538
455
 1,463
Long-Term Debt (See accompanying statements)
1,097
 2,424
1,539
 1,097
Deferred Credits and Other Liabilities:      
Accumulated deferred income taxes
 756
378
 
Deferred credits related to income taxes372
 7
382
 372
Employee benefit obligations116
 115
115
 116
Asset retirement obligations, deferred137
 146
126
 137
Other cost of removal obligations178
 170
185
 178
Other regulatory liabilities, deferred79
 77
81
 79
Other deferred credits and liabilities33
 26
16
 33
Total deferred credits and other liabilities915
 1,297
1,283
 915
Total Liabilities3,475
 5,259
3,277
 3,475
Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Stock (See accompanying statements)
33
 33

 33
Common Stockholder's Equity (See accompanying statements)
1,358
 2,943
1,609
 1,358
Total Liabilities and Stockholder's Equity$4,866
 $8,235
$4,886
 $4,866
Commitments and Contingent Matters (See notes)

 

 
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
 
    Table of Contents                                Index to Financial Statements

STATEMENTS OF CAPITALIZATION
At December 31, 20172018 and 20162017
Mississippi Power Company 20172018 Annual Report

2017 2016 2017 20162018 2017 2018 2017
(in millions) (percent of total)(in millions) (percent of total)
Long-Term Debt:              
Long-term notes payable —              
5.60% due 2017$
 $35
    
1.63% due 201850
 50
    
5.55% due 2019125
 125
    $
 $125
    
4.25% to 5.40% due 2035-2042630
 630
    
1.63% to 5.40% due 2028-2042950
 680
    
Adjustable rate (3.05% at 12/31/17) due 2018900
 1,200
    
 900
    
Adjustable rate (3.47% at 12/31/18) due 2020300
 
    
Total long-term notes payable1,705
 2,040
    1,250
 1,705
    
Other long-term debt —              
Pollution control revenue bonds —              
5.15% due 202843
 43
    
 43
    
Variable rates (2.45% to 2.50% at 12/31/17) due 201840
 40
    
Variable rates (2.20% to 2.23% at 12/31/18) due 201940
 40
    
Plant Daniel revenue bonds (7.13%) due 2021270
 270
    270
 270
    
Long-term debt payable to parent company (2.27%) due 2017
 551
    
Total other long-term debt353
 904
    310
 353
    
Capitalized lease obligations
 74
    
Unamortized debt premium36
 45
    29
 36
    
Unamortized debt discount(1) (2)    (2) (1)    
Unamortized debt issuance expense(7) (8)    (8) (7)    
Total long-term debt (annual interest requirement — $86 million)2,086
 3,053
    
Total long-term debt (annual interest requirement — $70 million)1,579
 2,086
    
Less amount due within one year989
 629
    40
 989
    
Long-term debt excluding amount due within one year1,097
 2,424
 44.1% 44.9%1,539
 1,097
 48.9% 44.1%
Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Stock:              
$100 par value —       
$100 par value — 4.40% to 5.25%       
Authorized — 1,244,139 shares              
Outstanding — 334,210 shares       
4.40% to 5.25% (annual dividend requirement — $2 million)33
 33
 1.3
 0.6
Outstanding — 2018: no shares       
— 2017: 334,210 shares

 33
 
 1.3
Common Stockholder's Equity:              
Common stock, without par value —              
Authorized — 1,130,000 shares
 
    
 
    
Outstanding — 1,121,000 shares38
 38
    38
 38
    
Paid-in capital4,529
 3,525
    4,546
 4,529
    
Accumulated deficit(3,205) (616)    (2,971) (3,205)    
Accumulated other comprehensive loss(4) (4)    (4) (4)    
Total common stockholder's equity1,358
 2,943
 54.6
 54.5
1,609
 1,358
 51.1
 54.6
Total Capitalization$2,488
 $5,400
 100.0% 100.0%$3,148
 $2,488
 100.0% 100.0%
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
 
    Table of Contents                                Index to Financial Statements

STATEMENTS OF COMMON STOCKHOLDER'S EQUITY
For the Years Ended December 31, 20172018, 20162017, and 20152016
Mississippi Power Company 20172018 Annual Report

Number of Common Shares Issued 
Common
Stock
 Paid-In Capital Retained Earnings (Accumulated Deficit) Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss) TotalNumber of Common Shares Issued 
Common
Stock
 Paid-In Capital Retained Earnings (Accumulated Deficit) Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss) Total
(in millions)(in millions)
Balance at December 31, 20141
 $38
 $2,612
 $(559) $(7) $2,084
Net loss after dividends on preferred stock
 
 
 (8) 
 (8)
Capital contributions from parent company
 
 281
 
 
 281
Other comprehensive income (loss)
 
 
 
 1
 1
Other
 
 
 1
 
 1
Balance at December 31, 20151
 38
 2,893
 (566) (6) 2,359
1
 $38
 $2,893
 $(566) $(6) $2,359
Net loss after dividends on preferred stock
 
 
 (50) 
 (50)
 
 
 (50) 
 (50)
Capital contributions from parent company
 
 632
 
 
 632

 
 632
 
 
 632
Other comprehensive income (loss)
 
 
 
 2
 2

 
 
 
 2
 2
Balance at December 31, 20161
 38
 3,525
 (616) (4) 2,943
1
 38
 3,525
 (616) (4) 2,943
Net loss after dividends on preferred stock
 
 
 (2,590) 
 (2,590)
 
 
 (2,590) 
 (2,590)
Capital contributions from parent company
 
 1,004
 
 
 1,004

 
 1,004
 
 
 1,004
Other
 
 
 1
 
 1

 
 
 1
 
 1
Balance at December 31, 20171
 $38
 $4,529
 $(3,205) $(4) $1,358
1
 38
 4,529
 (3,205) (4) 1,358
Net income after dividends on preferred stock
 
 
 235
 
 235
Capital contributions from parent company
 
 17
 
 
 17
Other
 
 
 (1) 
 (1)
Balance at December 31, 20181
 $38
 $4,546
 $(2,971) $(4) $1,609
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
 
    Table of Contents                                Index to Financial Statements

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Mississippi Power Company 2017 Annual Report




Index to the Notes to Financial Statements



NOTES (continued)
Mississippi Power Company 2017 Annual Report

1. SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES
General
Mississippi Power Company (the Company) is a wholly-owned subsidiary of Southern Company, which is the parent company of the Company and three other traditional electric operating companies, as well as Southern Power, Southern Company Gas (as of July 1, 2016), SCS, Southern Linc, Southern Company Holdings, Inc. (Southern Holdings), Southern Nuclear, PowerSecure, Inc. (PowerSecure) (as of May 9, 2016), and other direct and indirect subsidiaries. The traditional electric operating companies – Alabama Power, Georgia Power, Gulf Power, and the Company – are vertically integrated utilities providing electric service in four Southeastern states. The Company provides electric service to retail customers in southeast Mississippi and to wholesale customers in the Southeast. Southern Power develops, constructs, acquires, owns, and manages power generation assets, including renewable energy projects, and sells electricity at market-based rates in the wholesale market. Southern Company Gas distributes natural gas through utilities in seven states and is involved in several other complementary businesses including gas marketing services, wholesale gas services, and gas midstream operations. SCS, the system service company, provides, at cost, specialized services to Southern Company and its subsidiary companies. Southern Linc provides digital wireless communications for use by Southern Company and its subsidiary companies and also markets these services to the public and provides fiber optics services within the Southeast. Southern Holdings is an intermediate holding company subsidiary, primarily for Southern Company's investments in leveraged leases and for other electric services. Southern Nuclear operates and provides services to the Southern Company system's nuclear power plants. PowerSecure is a provider of products and services in the areas of distributed generation, energy efficiency, and utility infrastructure.
The Company is subject to regulation by the FERC and the Mississippi PSC. As such, the Company's financial statements reflect the effects of rate regulation in accordance with GAAP and comply with the accounting policies and practices prescribed by its regulatory commissions. The preparation of financial statements in conformity with GAAP requires the use of estimates, and the actual results may differ from those estimates. Certain prior years' data presented in the financial statements have been reclassified to conform to the current year presentation.
Recently Issued Accounting Standards
Revenue
In 2014, the FASB issued ASC 606, Revenue from Contracts with Customers (ASC 606), replacing the existing accounting standard and industry specific guidance for revenue recognition with a five-step model for recognizing and measuring revenue from contracts with customers. The underlying principle of the new standard is to recognize revenue to depict the transfer of goods or services to customers at the amount expected to be collected. The new standard also requires enhanced disclosures regarding the nature, amount, timing, and uncertainty of revenue and the related cash flows arising from contracts with customers.
Most of the Company's revenue, including energy provided to customers, is from tariff offerings that provide electricity without a defined contractual term, as well as longer-term contractual commitments, including PPAs.
The Company has completed the evaluation of all revenue streams and determined that the adoption of ASC 606 will not change the current timing of revenue recognition for such transactions. Some revenue arrangements, such as energy-related derivatives and alternative revenue programs, are excluded from the scope of ASC 606 and, therefore, will be accounted for and disclosed or presented separately from revenues under ASC 606 on the Company's financial statements, if material. The Company has concluded contributions in aid of construction are not in scope for ASC 606 and will continue to be accounted for as an offset to property, plant, and equipment.
The new standard is effective for reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2017. The Company applied the modified retrospective method of adoption effective January 1, 2018. The Company also utilized practical expedients which allowed it to apply the standard to open contracts at the date of adoption and to reflect the aggregate effect of all modifications when identifying performance obligations and allocating the transaction price for contracts modified before the effective date. Under the modified retrospective method of adoption, prior year reported results are not restated; however, a cumulative-effect adjustment to retained earnings at January 1, 2018 is recorded. In addition, quarterly disclosures will include comparative information on 2018 financial statement line items under current guidance. The adoption of ASC 606 did not result in a cumulative-effect adjustment.
Leases
In February 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-02, Leases (Topic 842) (ASU 2016-02). ASU 2016-02 requires lessees to recognize on the balance sheet a lease liability and a right-of-use asset for all leases. ASU 2016-02 also changes the recognition, measurement, and presentation of expense associated with leases and provides clarification regarding the identification of certain

NOTES (continued)
Mississippi Power Company 2017 Annual Report

components of contracts that would represent a lease. The accounting required by lessors is relatively unchanged. ASU 2016-02 is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2018 and the Company will adopt the new standard effective January 1, 2019.
The Company is currently implementing an information technology system along with the related changes to internal controls and accounting policies that will support the accounting for leases under ASU 2016-02. In addition, the Company has substantially completed a detailed inventory and analysis of its leases. In terms of rental charges and duration of contracts, the most significant leases relate to equipment and cellular towers where the Company is the lessee and to equipment where the Company is the lessor. The Company is currently analyzing pole attachment agreements and a lease determination has not been made at this time. While the Company has not yet determined the ultimate impact, adoption of ASU 2016-02 is expected to have a significant impact on the Company's balance sheet.
Other
In March 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-09, Compensation-Stock Compensation (Topic 718): Improvements to Employee Share-Based Payment Accounting (ASU 2016-09). ASU 2016-09 changes the accounting for income taxes and the cash flow presentation for share-based payment award transactions effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2016. The new guidance requires all excess tax benefits and deficiencies related to the exercise or vesting of stock compensation to be recognized as income tax expense or benefit in the income statement. Previously, the Company recognized any excess tax benefits and deficiencies related to the exercise and vesting of stock compensation as additional paid-in capital. In addition, the new guidance requires excess tax benefits for share-based payments to be included in net cash provided from operating activities rather than net cash provided from financing activities on the statement of cash flows. The Company elected to adopt the guidance in 2016 and reflect the related adjustments as of January 1, 2016. Prior year's data presented in the financial statements has not been adjusted. The Company also elected to recognize forfeitures as they occur. The new guidance did not have a material impact on the results of operations, financial position, or cash flows of the Company. See Notes 5 and 8 for disclosures impacted by ASU 2016-09.
On March 10, 2017, the FASB issued ASU No. 2017-07, Compensation – Retirement Benefits (Topic 715): Improving the Presentation of Net Periodic Pension Cost and Net Periodic Postretirement Benefit Cost (ASU 2017-07). ASU 2017-07 requires that an employer report the service cost component in the same line item or items as other compensation costs and requires the other components of net periodic pension and postretirement benefit costs to be separately presented in the income statement outside of income from operations. Additionally, only the service cost component is eligible for capitalization, when applicable. However, all cost components remain eligible for capitalization under FERC regulations. ASU 2017-07 will be applied retrospectively for the presentation of the service cost component and the other components of net periodic pension and postretirement benefit costs in the income statement. The capitalization of only the service cost component of net periodic pension and postretirement benefit costs in assets will be applied on a prospective basis. ASU 2017-07 is effective for periods beginning after December 15, 2017. The presentation changes required for net periodic pension and postretirement benefit costs will result in a decrease in the Company's operating income and an increase in other income for 2016 and 2017 and are expected to result in a decrease in operating income and an increase in other income for 2018. The Company adopted ASU 2017-07 effective January 1, 2018 with no material impact on its financial statements.
On August 28, 2017, the FASB issued ASU No. 2017-12, Derivatives and Hedging (Topic 815): Targeted Improvements to Accounting for Hedging Activities (ASU 2017-12), amending the hedge accounting recognition and presentation requirements. ASU 2017-12 makes more financial and non-financial hedging strategies eligible for hedge accounting, amends the related presentation and disclosure requirements, and simplifies hedge effectiveness assessment requirements. ASU 2017-12 is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2018, with early adoption permitted. The Company adopted ASU 2017-12 effective January 1, 2018 with no material impact on its financial statements.
Affiliate Transactions
The Company has an agreement with SCS under which the following services are rendered to the Company at direct or allocated cost: general and design engineering, operations, purchasing, accounting, finance and treasury, tax, information technology, marketing, auditing, insurance and pension administration, human resources, systems and procedures, digital wireless communications, and other services with respect to business and operations, construction management, and power pool transactions. Costs for these services amounted to $140 million, $231 million, and $295 million during 2017, 2016, and 2015, respectively. Cost allocation methodologies used by SCS prior to the repeal of the Public Utility Holding Company Act of 1935, as amended, were approved by the SEC. Subsequently, additional cost allocation methodologies have been reported to the FERC and management believes they are reasonable. The FERC permits services to be rendered at cost by system service companies. See Note 7 under "Operating Leases" for additional information.

NOTES (continued)
Mississippi Power Company 2017 Annual Report

The Company has an agreement with Alabama Power under which the Company owns a portion of Greene County Steam Plant. Alabama Power operates Greene County Steam Plant, and the Company reimburses Alabama Power for its proportionate share of non-fuel expenditures and costs, which totaled $9 million, $13 million, and $11 million in 2017, 2016, and 2015, respectively. Also, the Company reimburses Alabama Power for any direct fuel purchases delivered from an Alabama Power transfer facility. There were no fuel purchases in 2017 or 2016. Fuel purchases were $8 million in 2015. The Company also has an agreement with Gulf Power under which Gulf Power owns a portion of Plant Daniel. The Company operates Plant Daniel, and Gulf Power reimburses the Company for its proportionate share of all associated expenditures and costs, which totaled $31 million, $26 million, and $27 million in 2017, 2016, and 2015, respectively. See Note 4 for additional information.
Total power purchased from affiliates through the power pool, included in purchased power in the statement of operations, totaled $16 million, $29 million, and $7 million in 2017, 2016, and 2015, respectively.
In June 2017, the Company received a capital contribution from Southern Company of $1.0 billion. The Company used a portion of the proceeds to repay all of the $591 million outstanding principal amount of promissory notes to Southern Company. See Note 6 for additional information.
On September 15, 2017, the Company issued a floating rate promissory note to Southern Company in an aggregate principal amount of up to $150 million bearing interest based on one-month LIBOR. The Company borrowed $109 million under this promissory note primarily to satisfy its federal income tax obligations for the quarter ending September 30, 2017 and subsequently repaid the promissory note upon receipt of its income tax refund from the U.S. federal government related to the settlement concerning deductible research and experimental (R&E) expenditures. See Note 5 under "Section 174 Research and Experimental Deduction" for additional information.
The Company also provides incidental services to and receives such services from other Southern Company subsidiaries which are generally minor in duration and amount. Except as described herein, the Company neither provided nor received any material services to or from affiliates in 2017, 2016, or 2015.
The traditional electric operating companies, including the Company, and Southern Power may jointly enter into various types of wholesale energy, natural gas, and certain other contracts, either directly or through SCS, as agent. Each participating company may be jointly and severally liable for the obligations incurred under these agreements. See Note 7 under "Fuel and Purchased Power Agreements" for additional information.
Regulatory Assets and Liabilities
The Company is subject to accounting requirements for the effects of rate regulation. Regulatory assets represent probable future revenues associated with certain costs that are expected to be recovered from customers through the ratemaking process. Regulatory liabilities represent probable future reductions in revenues associated with amounts that are expected to be credited to customers through the ratemaking process.

NOTES (continued)
Mississippi Power Company 2017 Annual Report

Regulatory assets and (liabilities) reflected in the balance sheets at December 31 relate to:
 2017
 2016
 Note
 (in millions)
Retiree benefit plans – regulatory assets$174
 $173
 (a)
Asset retirement obligations95
 83
 (b)
Kemper County energy facility88
 194
 (c)
Remaining net book value of retired assets44
 53
 (d)
Property tax43
 37
 (e)
Deferred charges related to income taxes36
 362
 (d)
Plant Daniel Units 3 and 436
 33
 (f)
Other regulatory assets28
 28
 (g)
ECO carryforward26
 22
 (h)
Other regulatory liabilities
 (1) (i)
Deferred credits related to income taxes(377) (9) (j)
Other cost of removal obligations(178) (170) (k)
Property damage(57) (68) (l)
Total regulatory assets (liabilities), net$(42) $737
  
Note: The recovery and amortization periods for these regulatory assets and (liabilities) are as follows:
(a)Recovered and amortized over the average remaining service period which may range up to 15 years. See Note 2 for additional information.
(b)To be recovered upon completion of removal activities over a period approved by the Mississippi PSC.
(c)Includes $114 million of regulatory assets and $26 million of regulatory liabilities to be recovered in rates over periods of eight and six years, respectively. For additional information, see Note 3 under "Kemper County Energy Facility – Rate Recovery – Kemper Settlement Agreement."
(d)Recovered over the related property lives up to 48 years.
(e)
Recovered through the ad valorem tax adjustment clause over a 12-month period beginning in April of the following year. See Note 3 under "Retail Regulatory Matters – Ad Valorem Tax Adjustment" for additional information.
(f)Represents the difference between the revenue requirement under the purchase option and the revenue requirement assuming operating lease accounting treatment for the extended term, which will be amortized over a 10-year period beginning October 2021.
(g)Comprised of vacation pay, loss on reacquired debt, and other miscellaneous assets. These costs are recorded and recovered or amortized as approved by the Mississippi PSC over periods which may range up to 50 years. This amount also includes fuel-hedging assets and liabilities which are recorded over the life of the underlying hedged purchase contracts, which generally do not exceed three years. Upon final settlement, actual costs incurred are recovered through the ECM.
(h)Recovered through the ECO clause in the year following the deferral.
(i)Comprised of numerous immaterial components including deferred income tax credits and other miscellaneous liabilities that are recorded and refunded or amortized as approved by the Mississippi PSC generally over periods not exceeding one year.
(j)This amount includes excess deferred income taxes primarily associated with Tax Reform Legislation of $375 million, of which $273 million is related to protected deferred income taxes to be recovered over the related property lives utilizing the average rate assumption method in accordance with IRS normalization principles and $102 million related to unprotected (not subject to normalization) deferred income taxes to be amortized over a period approved by the Mississippi PSC or the FERC, as appropriate. Of the total excess deferred income taxes associated with Tax Reform Legislation, $129 million is associated with the Kemper County energy facility. The unprotected portion associated with the Kemper County energy facility is $54 million, of which $38 million is being amortized over eight years for retail as approved by the Mississippi PSC on February 6, 2018 and $16 million is wholesale-related. Currently, the Company is requesting eight-year amortization for the remaining portions of the unprotected deferred income taxes associated with Tax Reform Legislation in all of its retail and wholesale rate filings. See Note 3 under "Retail Regulatory Matters" and "Kemper County Energy Facility" and Note 5 for additional information.
(k)Collected in advance from customers to remove assets upon their retirement.
(l)For additional information, see Note 1 under "Provision for Property Damage."
In the event that a portion of the Company's operations is no longer subject to applicable accounting rules for rate regulation, the Company would be required to write off to income or reclassify to accumulated OCI related regulatory assets and liabilities that are not specifically recoverable through regulated rates. In addition, the Company would be required to determine if any impairment to other assets, including plant, exists and write down the assets, if impaired, to their fair values. All regulatory assets and liabilities are to be reflected in rates. See Note 3 under "Retail Regulatory Matters" and "Kemper County Energy Facility" for additional information.

NOTES (continued)
Mississippi Power Company 2017 Annual Report

Government Grants
In 2010, the DOE, through a cooperative agreement with SCS, agreed to fund $270 million of the Kemper County energy facility through the grants awarded to the project by the DOE under the Clean Coal Power Initiative Round 2 (Initial DOE Grants). Through December 31, 2017, the Company has received grant funds of $382 million, of which $245 million of the Initial DOE Grants were used for the construction of the Kemper County energy facility, which is reflected in the Company's financial statements as a reduction to the Kemper County energy facility capital costs, and $137 million received on April 8, 2016 (Additional DOE Grants), which are expected to be used to reduce future rate impacts. An additional $2 million is expected to be received for allowable costs through December 31, 2017. See Note 3 under "Kemper County Energy Facility – Schedule and Cost Estimate" for additional information.
Revenues
Energy and other revenues are recognized as services are provided. Wholesale capacity revenues from long-term contracts are recognized at the lesser of the levelized amount or the amount billable under the contract over the respective contract period. Unbilled revenues related to retail sales are accrued at the end of each fiscal period. The Company's retail and wholesale rates include provisions to adjust billings for fluctuations in fuel costs, fuel hedging, the energy component of purchased power costs, and certain other costs. Retail rates also include provisions to adjust billings for fluctuations in costs for ad valorem taxes and certain qualifying environmental costs. Revenues are adjusted for differences between these actual costs and projected amounts billed in current regulated rates. Under or over recovered regulatory clause revenues are recorded in the balance sheets and are recovered or returned to customers through adjustments to the billing factors. The Company is required to file with the Mississippi PSC for an adjustment to the fuel cost recovery, ad valorem, and environmental factors annually.
The Company serves long-term contracts with rural electric cooperative associations and municipalities located in southeastern Mississippi under cost-based MRA electric tariffs which are subject to regulation by the FERC. The contracts with these wholesale customers represented 19.3% of the Company's total operating revenues in2017 and are largely subject to rolling 10-year cancellation notices. Historically, these wholesale customers have acted as a group and any changes in contractual relationships for one customer are likely to be followed by the other wholesale customers.
Except as described above for the Company's cost-based MRA electric tariff customers, the Company has a diversified base of customers and no single customer or industry comprises 10% or more of revenues. For all periods presented, uncollectible accounts averaged less than 1% of revenues.
See Note 3 under "Retail Regulatory Matters" for additional information.
Fuel Costs
Fuel costs are expensed as the fuel is used. Fuel expense generally includes fuel transportation costs and the cost of purchased emissions allowances as they are used. Fuel costs also include gains and/or losses from fuel-hedging programs as approved by the Mississippi PSC.
Income and Other Taxes
The Company uses the liability method of accounting for deferred income taxes and provides deferred income taxes for all significant income tax temporary differences. ITCs utilized are deferred and amortized to income over the average life of the related property. Taxes that are collected from customers on behalf of governmental agencies to be remitted to these agencies are presented net on the statements of operations.
The Company recognizes tax positions that are "more likely than not" of being sustained upon examination by the appropriate taxing authorities. See Note 5 under "Unrecognized Tax Benefits" for additional information.
Property, Plant, and Equipment
Property, plant, and equipment is stated at original cost less any regulatory disallowances and impairments. Original cost includes: materials; labor; minor items of property; appropriate administrative and general costs; payroll-related costs such as taxes, pensions, and other benefits; and the interest capitalized and cost of equity funds used during construction for projects where recovery of CWIP is not allowed in rates.

NOTES (continued)
Mississippi Power Company 2017 Annual Report

The Company's property, plant, and equipment in service consisted of the following at December 31:
 2017 2016
 (in millions)
Generation$2,801
 $2,632
Transmission737
 712
Distribution946
 916
General204
 520
Plant acquisition adjustment85
 85
Total plant in service$4,773
 $4,865
The cost of replacements of property, exclusive of minor items of property, is capitalized. The cost of maintenance, repairs, and replacement of minor items of property is charged to other operations and maintenance expenses except for a portion of the railway track maintenance costs. The portion of railway track maintenance costs not charged to operations and maintenance expenses are charged to fuel stock and recovered through the Company's fuel clause.
Depreciation, Depletion, and Amortization
Depreciation of the original cost of utility plant in service is provided primarily by using composite straight-line rates, which approximated 3.7% in 2017, 4.2% in 2016, and 4.7% in 2015. The decrease in 2017 is primarily due to lower depreciation expense as a result of recording a loss on the lignite mine in June 2017. The decrease in the 2016 depreciation rate is primarily due to fully depreciating and retiring the ARO at Plant Watson, partially offset by the increase in depreciation for the Plant Daniel scrubbers for a full year. See "Asset Retirement Obligations and Other Costs of Removal" herein for additional information. Depreciation studies are conducted periodically to update the composite rates. The Mississippi PSC approved the 2014 study, with new rates effective January 1, 2015. When property subject to depreciation is retired or otherwise disposed of in the normal course of business, its original cost, together with the cost of removal, less salvage, is charged to accumulated depreciation. Minor items of property included in the original cost of the plant are retired when the related property unit is retired. Depreciation includes an amount for the expected cost of removal of facilities, except for the Kemper County energy facility combined cycle and related assets in service.
Asset Retirement Obligations and Other Costs of Removal
AROs are computed as the present value of the estimated ultimate costs for an asset's future retirement and are recorded in the period in which the liability is incurred. The costs are capitalized as part of the related long-lived asset and depreciated over the asset's useful life. In the absence of quoted market prices, AROs are estimated using present value techniques in which estimates of future cash outlays associated with the asset retirements are discounted using a credit-adjusted risk-free rate. Estimates of the timing and amounts of future cash outlays are based on projections of when and how the assets will be retired and the cost of future removal activities. The Company has received accounting guidance from the Mississippi PSC allowing the continued accrual of other future retirement costs for long-lived assets that the Company does not have a legal obligation to retire. Accordingly, the accumulated removal costs for these obligations are reflected in the balance sheets as a regulatory liability.
The liability for AROs primarily relates to facilities that are subject to the Disposal of Coal Combustion Residuals from Electric Utilities final rule published by the EPA in 2015 (CCR Rule), principally ash ponds. In addition, the Company has retirement obligations related to various landfill sites, underground storage tanks, deep injection wells, water wells, substation removal, mine reclamation, and asbestos removal. The Company also has identified AROs related to certain transmission and distribution facilities and certain wireless communication towers. However, liabilities for the removal of these assets have not been recorded because the settlement timing for the AROs related to these assets is indeterminable and, therefore, the fair value of the AROs cannot be reasonably estimated. A liability for these AROs will be recognized when sufficient information becomes available to support a reasonable estimation of the ARO. The Company will continue to recognize in the statements of operations allowed removal costs in accordance with its regulatory treatment. Any differences between costs recognized in accordance with accounting standards related to asset retirement and environmental obligations and those reflected in rates are recognized as either a regulatory asset or liability, as ordered by the Mississippi PSC, and are reflected in the balance sheets.

NOTES (continued)
Mississippi Power Company 2017 Annual Report

Details of the AROs included in the balance sheets are as follows:
 2017 2016
 (in millions)
Balance at beginning of year$179
 $177
Liabilities incurred
 15
Liabilities settled(23) (23)
Accretion5
 5
Cash flow revisions13
 5
Balance at end of year$174
 $179
The increase in cash flow revisions in 2017 is primarily related to a revision in the closure date of the lignite mine ARO.
The cost estimates for AROs related to the CCR Rule are based on information as of December 31, 2017 using various assumptions related to closure and post-closure costs, timing of future cash outlays, inflation and discount rates, and the potential methods for complying with the CCR Rule requirements for closure. As further analysis is performed and closure details are developed, the Company will continue to periodically update these cost estimates as necessary.
Allowance for Funds Used During Construction
The Company records AFUDC, which represents the estimated debt and equity costs of capital funds that are necessary to finance the construction of new regulated facilities. While cash is not realized currently, AFUDC increases the revenue requirement and is recovered over the service life of the plant through a higher rate base and higher depreciation. The equity component of AFUDC is not included in the calculation of taxable income. The average annual AFUDC rate was 6.7%, 6.5%, and 5.99% for the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016, and 2015, respectively. AFUDC equity was $72 million, $124 million, and $110 million in 2017, 2016, and 2015, respectively. The decrease in 2017 resulted from the Kemper IGCC project suspension in June 2017.
Impairment of Long-Lived Assets and Intangibles
The Company evaluates long-lived assets for impairment when events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying value of such assets may not be recoverable. The determination of whether an impairment has occurred is based on either a specific regulatory disallowance or an estimate of undiscounted future cash flows attributable to the assets, as compared with the carrying value of the assets. If an impairment has occurred, the amount of the impairment recognized is determined by either the amount of regulatory disallowance or by estimating the fair value of the assets and recording a loss if the carrying value is greater than the fair value. For assets identified as held for sale, the carrying value is compared to the estimated fair value less the cost to sell in order to determine if an impairment loss is required. Until the assets are disposed of, their estimated fair value is re-evaluated when circumstances or events change.
Provision for Property Damage
The Company carries insurance for the cost of certain types of damage to generation plants and general property. However, the Company is self-insured for the cost of storm, fire, and other uninsured casualty damage to its property, including transmission and distribution facilities. As permitted by the Mississippi PSC and the FERC, the Company accrues for the cost of such damage through an annual expense accrual credited to regulatory liability accounts for the retail and wholesale jurisdictions. The cost of repairing actual damage resulting from such events that individually exceed $50,000 is charged to the reserve. Every three years the Mississippi PSC, the MPUS, and the Company will agree on SRR revenue level(s) for the ensuing period, based on historical data, expected exposure, type and amount of insurance coverage, excluding insurance cost, and any other relevant information. The accrual amount and the reserve balance are determined based on the SRR revenue level(s). If a significant change in circumstances occurs, then the SRR revenue level can be adjusted more frequently if the Company and the MPUS or the Mississippi PSC deem the change appropriate. The property damage reserve accrual will be the difference between the approved SRR revenues and the SRR revenue requirement, excluding any accrual to the reserve. In addition, SRR allows the Company to set up a regulatory asset, pending review, if the allowable actual retail property damage costs exceed the amount in the retail property damage reserve. The Company made retail accruals of $3 million, $4 million, and $3 million for 2017, 2016, and 2015, respectively. The Company also accrued $0.3 million annually in 2017, 2016, and 2015 for the wholesale jurisdiction. As of December 31, 2017, the property damage reserve balances were $56 million and $1 million for retail and wholesale, respectively.

NOTES (continued)
Mississippi Power Company 2017 Annual Report

Cash and Cash Equivalents
For purposes of the financial statements, temporary cash investments are considered cash equivalents. Temporary cash investments are securities with original maturities of 90 days or less.
Materials and Supplies
Generally, materials and supplies include the average cost of transmission, distribution, mining, and generating plant materials. Materials are charged to inventory when purchased and then expensed, capitalized to plant, or charged to fuel stock, as used, at weighted-average cost when utilized.
Fuel Inventory
Fuel inventory includes the average cost of coal, natural gas, oil, transportation, and emissions allowances. Fuel costs are recorded to inventory when purchased, and then expensed, at weighted average cost, as used and recovered by the Company through fuel cost recovery rates. The retail rate is approved by the Mississippi PSC and the wholesale rates are approved by the FERC. Emissions allowances granted by the EPA are included in inventory at zero cost.
Financial Instruments
The Company uses derivative financial instruments to limit exposure to fluctuations in interest rates, the prices of certain fuel purchases, and electricity purchases and sales. All derivative financial instruments are recognized as either assets or liabilities on the balance sheets (included in "Other" or shown separately as "Risk Management Activities") and are measured at fair value. See Note 9 for additional information regarding fair value. Substantially all of the Company's bulk energy purchases and sales contracts that meet the definition of a derivative are excluded from the fair value accounting requirements because they qualify for the "normal" scope exception, and are accounted for under the accrual method. Fuel and interest rate derivative contracts that qualify as cash flow hedges of anticipated transactions or are recoverable through the Mississippi PSC approved fuel-hedging program as discussed below result in the deferral of related gains and losses in OCI or regulatory assets and liabilities, respectively, until the hedged transactions occur. Other derivative contracts that qualify as fair value hedges are marked to market through current period income and are recorded on a net basis in the statements of operations. Cash flows from derivatives are classified on the statement of cash flows in the same category as the hedged item. See Note 10 for additional information regarding derivatives.
The Company offsets fair value amounts recognized for multiple derivative instruments executed with the same counterparty under a netting arrangement. Additionally, the Company's collateral repayment obligations or rights to reclaim collateral arising from derivative instruments recognized at December 31, 2017 are immaterial.
The Company has an ECM clause which, among other things, allows the Company to utilize financial instruments to hedge its fuel commitments. Changes in the fair value of these financial instruments are recorded as regulatory assets or liabilities. Amounts paid or received as a result of financial settlement of these instruments are classified as fuel expense and are included in the ECM factor applied to customer billings. The Company's jurisdictional wholesale customers have a similar ECM mechanism, which has been approved by the FERC.
The Company is exposed to potential losses related to financial instruments in the event of counterparties' nonperformance. The Company has established controls to determine and monitor the creditworthiness of counterparties in order to mitigate the Company's exposure to counterparty credit risk.
Comprehensive Income
The objective of comprehensive income is to report a measure of all changes in common stock equity of an enterprise that result from transactions and other economic events of the period other than transactions with owners. Comprehensive income consists of net income, changes in the fair value of qualifying cash flow hedges, and reclassifications for amounts included in net income.
Variable Interest Entities
The primary beneficiary of a variable interest entity (VIE) is required to consolidate the VIE when it has both the power to direct the activities of the VIE that most significantly impact the VIE's economic performance and the obligation to absorb losses or the right to receive benefits from the VIE that could potentially be significant to the VIE.
The Company was required to provide financing for all costs associated with the mine development and operation under a contract with Liberty Fuels Company, LLC, a subsidiary of North American Coal Corporation (Liberty Fuels), in conjunction with the construction of the Kemper County energy facility. Liberty Fuels qualified as a VIE for which the Company was the primary beneficiary. As of December 31, 2016, the VIE consolidation resulted in an ARO asset and associated liability in the

NOTES (continued)
Mississippi Power Company 2017 Annual Report

amounts of $20 million and $24 million, respectively. As of December 31, 2017, the VIE consolidation resulted in an ARO liability in the amount of $38 million. The associated ARO asset was included as part of an additional charge to income in 2017 as a result of the Company's assessment of the probability of disallowance by the Mississippi PSC. See Note 3 under "Kemper County Energy Facility" for additional information.
2. RETIREMENT BENEFITS
The Company has a defined benefit, trusteed, pension plan covering substantially all employees. This qualified pension plan is funded in accordance with requirements of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974, as amended (ERISA). No contributions to the qualified pension plan were made for the year ended December 31, 2017 and no mandatory contributions to the qualified pension plan are anticipated for the year ending December 31, 2018. The Company also provides certain defined benefit pension plans for a selected group of management and highly compensated employees. Benefits under these non-qualified pension plans are funded on a cash basis. In addition, the Company provides certain medical care and life insurance benefits for retired employees through other postretirement benefit plans. The Company funds its other postretirement trusts to the extent required by the FERC. For the year ending December 31, 2018, no other postretirement trust contributions are expected.

NOTES (continued)
Mississippi Power Company 2017 Annual Report

Actuarial Assumptions
The weighted average rates assumed in the actuarial calculations used to determine both the net periodic costs for the pension and other postretirement benefit plans for the following year and the benefit obligations as of the measurement date are presented below.
Assumptions used to determine net periodic costs:2017 2016 2015
Pension plans     
Discount rate – benefit obligations4.44% 4.69% 4.17%
Discount rate – interest costs3.81
 3.97
 4.17
Discount rate – service costs4.83
 5.04
 4.49
Expected long-term return on plan assets7.95
 8.20
 8.20
Annual salary increase4.46
 4.46
 3.59
Other postretirement benefit plans     
Discount rate – benefit obligations4.22% 4.47% 4.03%
Discount rate – interest costs3.55
 3.66
 4.03
Discount rate – service costs4.65
 4.88
 4.38
Expected long-term return on plan assets6.88
 7.07
 7.23
Annual salary increase4.46
 4.46
 3.59
Assumptions used to determine benefit obligations:2017 2016
Pension plans   
Discount rate3.80% 4.44%
Annual salary increase4.46
 4.46
Other postretirement benefit plans   
Discount rate3.68% 4.22%
Annual salary increase4.46
 4.46
The Company estimates the expected rate of return on pension plan and other postretirement benefit plan assets using a financial model to project the expected return on each current investment portfolio. The analysis projects an expected rate of return on each of eight different asset classes in order to arrive at the expected return on the entire portfolio relying on each trust's target asset allocation and reasonable capital market assumptions. The financial model is based on four key inputs: anticipated returns by asset class (based in part on historical returns), each trust's target asset allocation, an anticipated inflation rate, and the projected impact of a periodic rebalancing of each trust's portfolio.

NOTES (continued)
Mississippi Power Company 2017 Annual Report

An additional assumption used in measuring the accumulated other postretirement benefit obligations (APBO) was a weighted average medical care cost trend rate. The weighted average medical care cost trend rates used in measuring the APBO as of December 31, 2017 were as follows:
 Initial Cost Trend Rate Ultimate Cost Trend Rate Year That Ultimate Rate is Reached
Pre-656.50% 4.50% 2026
Post-65 medical5.00
 4.50
 2026
Post-65 prescription10.00
 4.50
 2026
An annual increase or decrease in the assumed medical care cost trend rate of 1% would affect the APBO and the service and interest cost components at December 31, 2017 as follows:
 
1 Percent
Increase
 
1 Percent
Decrease
 (in millions)
Benefit obligation$5
 $5
Service and interest costs
 
Pension Plans
The total accumulated benefit obligation for the pension plans was $541 million at December 31, 2017 and $479 million at December 31, 2016. Changes in the projected benefit obligations and the fair value of plan assets during the plan years ended December 31, 2017 and 2016 were as follows:
 2017 2016
 (in millions)
Change in benefit obligation   
Benefit obligation at beginning of year$534
 $500
Service cost15
 13
Interest cost20
 19
Benefits paid(22) (20)
Actuarial (gain) loss55
 22
Balance at end of year602
 534
Change in plan assets   
Fair value of plan assets at beginning of year499
 430
Actual return (loss) on plan assets84
 39
Employer contributions2
 50
Benefits paid(22) (20)
Fair value of plan assets at end of year563
 499
Accrued liability$(39) $(35)
At December 31, 2017, the projected benefit obligations for the qualified and non-qualified pension plans were $571 million and $31 million, respectively. All pension plan assets are related to the qualified pension plan.

NOTES (continued)
Mississippi Power Company 2017 Annual Report

Amounts recognized in the balance sheets at December 31, 2017 and 2016 related to the Company's pension plans consist of the following:
 2017 2016
 (in millions)
Other regulatory assets, deferred$158
 $154
Other current liabilities(3) (3)
Employee benefit obligations(36) (32)
Presented below are the amounts included in regulatory assets at December 31, 2017 and 2016 related to the defined benefit pension plans that had not yet been recognized in net periodic pension cost along with the estimated amortization of such amounts for 2018.
 2017 2016 Estimated Amortization in 2018
 (in millions)
Prior service cost$3
 $3
 $
Net (gain) loss155
 151
 10
Regulatory assets$158
 $154
  
The changes in the balance of regulatory assets related to the defined benefit pension plans for the years ended December 31, 2017 and 2016 are presented in the following table:
 2017 2016
 (in millions)
Regulatory assets:   
Beginning balance$154
 $144
Net (gain) loss12
 16
Change in prior service costs
 2
Reclassification adjustments:   
Amortization of prior service costs(1) (1)
Amortization of net gain (loss)(7) (7)
Total reclassification adjustments(8) (8)
Total change4
 10
Ending balance$158
 $154
Components of net periodic pension cost were as follows:
 2017 2016 2015
 (in millions)
Service cost$15
 $13
 $13
Interest cost20
 19
 21
Expected return on plan assets(40) (35) (33)
Recognized net (gain) loss7
 7
 10
Net amortization1
 1
 1
Net periodic pension cost$3
 $5
 $12
Net periodic pension cost is the sum of service cost, interest cost, and other costs netted against the expected return on plan assets. The expected return on plan assets is determined by multiplying the expected rate of return on plan assets and the market-related value of plan assets. In determining the market-related value of plan assets, the Company has elected to amortize changes in the market value of all plan assets over five years rather than recognize the changes immediately. As a result, the accounting value of plan assets that is used to calculate the expected return on plan assets differs from the current fair value of the plan assets.

NOTES (continued)
Mississippi Power Company 2017 Annual Report

Future benefit payments reflect expected future service and are estimated based on assumptions used to measure the projected benefit obligation for the pension plans. At December 31, 2017, estimated benefit payments were as follows:
 
Benefit
Payments
 (in millions)
2018$23
201924
202026
202127
202228
2023 to 2027164
Other Postretirement Benefits
Changes in the APBO and in the fair value of plan assets during the plan years ended December 31, 2017 and 2016 were as follows:
 2017 2016
 (in millions)
Change in benefit obligation   
Benefit obligation at beginning of year$97
 $97
Service cost1
 1
Interest cost3
 3
Benefits paid(6) (6)
Actuarial (gain) loss1
 1
Retiree drug subsidy1
 1
Balance at end of year97
 97
Change in plan assets   
Fair value of plan assets at beginning of year23
 23
Actual return (loss) on plan assets3
 1
Employer contributions4
 4
Benefits paid(5) (5)
Fair value of plan assets at end of year25
 23
Accrued liability$(72) $(74)
Amounts recognized in the balance sheets at December 31, 2017 and 2016 related to the Company's other postretirement benefit plans consist of the following:
 2017 2016
 (in millions)
Other regulatory assets, deferred$18
 $21
Other regulatory liabilities, deferred(1) (2)
Employee benefit obligations(72) (74)

NOTES (continued)
Mississippi Power Company 2017 Annual Report

Approximately $17 million and $19 million was included in net regulatory assets at December 31, 2017 and 2016, respectively, related to the net loss for the other postretirement benefit plans that had not yet been recognized in net periodic other postretirement benefit cost. The estimated amortization of such amounts for 2018 is $1 million.
The changes in the balance of net regulatory assets (liabilities) related to the other postretirement benefit plans for the plan years ended December 31, 2017 and 2016 are presented in the following table:
 2017 2016
 (in millions)
Net regulatory assets (liabilities):   
Beginning balance$19
 $18
Net (gain) loss(1) 2
Reclassification adjustments:   
Amortization of net gain (loss)(1) (1)
Total reclassification adjustments(1) (1)
Total change(2) 1
Ending balance$17
 $19
Components of the other postretirement benefit plans' net periodic cost were as follows:
 2017 2016 2015
 (in millions)
Service cost$1
 $1
 $1
Interest cost3
 3
 4
Expected return on plan assets(1) (1) (2)
Net amortization1
 1
 1
Net periodic postretirement benefit cost$4
 $4
 $4
Future benefit payments, including prescription drug benefits, reflect expected future service and are estimated based on assumptions used to measure the APBO for the other postretirement benefit plans. Estimated benefit payments are reduced by drug subsidy receipts expected as a result of the Medicare Prescription Drug, Improvement, and Modernization Act of 2003 as follows:
 
Benefit
Payments
 
Subsidy
Receipts
 Total
 (in millions)
2018$6
 $
 $6
20196
 
 6
20206
 (1) 5
20217
 (1) 6
20227
 (1) 6
2023 to 202734
 (2) 32
Benefit Plan Assets
Pension plan and other postretirement benefit plan assets are managed and invested in accordance with all applicable requirements, including ERISA and the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (Internal Revenue Code). The Company's investment policies for both the pension plan and the other postretirement benefit plans cover a diversified mix of assets, including equity and fixed income securities, real estate, and private equity. Derivative instruments are used primarily to gain efficient exposure to the various asset classes and as hedging tools. The Company minimizes the risk of large losses primarily through diversification but also monitors and manages other aspects of risk.

NOTES (continued)
Mississippi Power Company 2017 Annual Report

The composition of the Company's pension plan and other postretirement benefit plan assets as of December 31, 2017 and 2016, along with the targeted mix of assets for each plan, is presented below:
 Target 2017 2016
Pension plan assets:     
Domestic equity26% 31% 29%
International equity25
 25
 22
Fixed income23
 24
 29
Special situations3
 1
 2
Real estate investments14
 13
 13
Private equity9
 6
 5
Total100% 100% 100%
Other postretirement benefit plan assets:     
Domestic equity21% 25% 23%
International equity21
 20
 18
Domestic fixed income37
 38
 43
Special situations2
 1
 2
Real estate investments12
 11
 10
Private equity7
 5
 4
Total100% 100% 100%
The investment strategy for plan assets related to the Company's qualified pension plan is to be broadly diversified across major asset classes. The asset allocation is established after consideration of various factors that affect the assets and liabilities of the pension plan including, but not limited to, historical and expected returns and interest rates, volatility, correlations of asset classes, the current level of assets and liabilities, and the assumed growth in assets and liabilities. Because a significant portion of the liability of the pension plan is long-term in nature, the assets are invested consistent with long-term investment expectations for return and risk. To manage the actual asset class exposures relative to the target asset allocation, the Company employs a formal rebalancing program. As additional risk management, external investment managers and service providers are subject to written guidelines to ensure appropriate and prudent investment practices. Management believes the portfolio is well-diversified with no significant concentrations of risk.
Investment Strategies
Detailed below is a description of the investment strategies for each major asset category for the pension and other postretirement benefit plans disclosed above:
Domestic equity. A mix of large and small capitalization stocks with generally an equal distribution of value and growth attributes, managed both actively and through passive index approaches.
International equity. A mix of growth stocks and value stocks with both developed and emerging market exposure, managed both actively and through passive index approaches.
Fixed income. A mix of domestic and international bonds.
Special situations. Investments in opportunistic strategies with the objective of diversifying and enhancing returns and exploiting short-term inefficiencies as well as investments in promising new strategies of a longer-term nature.
Real estate investments. Investments in traditional private market, equity-oriented investments in real properties (indirectly through pooled funds or partnerships) and in publicly traded real estate securities.
Private equity. Investments in private partnerships that invest in private or public securities typically through privately-negotiated and/or structured transactions, including leveraged buyouts, venture capital, and distressed debt.
Benefit Plan Asset Fair Values
Following are the fair value measurements for the pension plan and the other postretirement benefit plan assets as of December 31, 2017 and 2016. The fair values presented are prepared in accordance with GAAP. For purposes of determining the fair value of the pension plan and other postretirement benefit plan assets and the appropriate level designation, management

NOTES (continued)
Mississippi Power Company 2017 Annual Report

relies on information provided by the plan's trustee. This information is reviewed and evaluated by management with changes made to the trustee information as appropriate.
Valuation methods of the primary fair value measurements disclosed in the following tables are as follows:
Domestic and international equity.Investments in equity securities such as common stocks, American depositary receipts, and real estate investment trusts that trade on a public exchange are classified as Level 1 investments and are valued at the closing price in the active market. Equity investments with unpublished prices (i.e. pooled funds) are valued as Level 2, when the underlying holdings used to value the investment are comprised of Level 1 or Level 2 equity securities.
Fixed income.Investments in fixed income securities are generally classified as Level 2 investments and are valued based on prices reported in the market place. Additionally, the value of fixed income securities takes into consideration certain items such as broker quotes, spreads, yield curves, interest rates, and discount rates that apply to the term of a specific instrument.
Real estate investments, private equity, and special situations investments.Investments in real estate, private equity, and special situations are generally classified as Net Asset Value as a Practical Expedient, since the underlying assets typically do not have publicly available observable inputs. The fund manager values the assets using various inputs and techniques depending on the nature of the underlying investments. Techniques may include purchase multiples for comparable transactions, comparable public company trading multiples, discounted cash flow analysis, prevailing market capitalization rates, recent sales of comparable investments, and independent third-party appraisals. The fair value of partnerships is determined by aggregating the value of the underlying assets less liabilities.
The fair values of pension plan assets as of December 31, 2017 and 2016 are presented below. These fair value measurements exclude cash, receivables related to investment income, pending investments sales, and payables related to pending investment purchases.
 Fair Value Measurements Using  
 Quoted Prices in Active Markets for Identical Assets Significant Other Observable Inputs Significant Unobservable Inputs Net Asset Value as a Practical Expedient  
As of December 31, 2017:(Level 1) (Level 2) (Level 3) (NAV) Total
 (in millions)
Assets:         
Domestic equity(*)
$113
 $55
 $
 $
 $168
International equity(*)
73
 66
 
 
 139
Fixed income:         
U.S. Treasury, government, and agency bonds
 40
 
 
 40
Corporate bonds
 56
 
 
 56
Pooled funds
 31
 
 
 31
Cash equivalents and other10
 1
 
 
 11
Real estate investments22
 
 
 56
 78
Special situations
 
 
 9
 9
Private equity
 
 
 32
 32
Total$218
 $249
 $
 $97
 $564
(*)Level 1 securities consist of actively traded stocks while Level 2 securities consist of pooled funds.

NOTES (continued)
Mississippi Power Company 2017 Annual Report

 Fair Value Measurements Using  
 Quoted Prices in Active Markets for Identical Assets Significant Other Observable Inputs Significant Unobservable Inputs Net Asset Value as a Practical Expedient  
As of December 31, 2016:(Level 1) (Level 2) (Level 3) (NAV) Total
 (in millions)
Assets:         
Domestic equity(*)
$95
 $44
 $
 $
 $139
International equity(*)
58
 51
 
 
 109
Fixed income:         
U.S. Treasury, government, and agency bonds
 28
 
 
 28
Mortgage- and asset-backed securities
 1
 
 
 1
Corporate bonds
 46
 
 
 46
Pooled funds
 25
 
 
 25
Cash equivalents and other47
 
 
 
 47
Real estate investments15
 
 
 54
 69
Special situations
 
 
 8
 8
Private equity
 
 
 26
 26
Total$215
 $195
 $
 $88
 $498
(*)Level 1 securities consist of actively traded stocks while Level 2 securities consist of pooled funds.
The fair values of other postretirement benefit plan assets as of December 31, 2017 and 2016 are presented below. These fair value measurements exclude cash, receivables related to investment income, pending investments sales, and payables related to pending investment purchases.
 Fair Value Measurements Using  
 Quoted Prices in Active Markets for Identical Assets Significant Other Observable Inputs Significant Unobservable Inputs Net Asset Value as a Practical Expedient  
As of December 31, 2017:(Level 1) (Level 2) (Level 3) (NAV) Total
 (in millions)
Assets:         
Domestic equity(*)
$4
 $2
 $
 $
 $6
International equity(*)
3
 2
 
 
 5
Fixed income:         
U.S. Treasury, government, and agency bonds
 5
 
 
 5
Corporate bonds
 2
 
 
 2
Pooled funds
 1
 
 
 1
Cash equivalents and other1
 
 
 
 1
Real estate investments1
 
 
 2
 3
Private equity
 
 
 1
 1
Total$9
 $12
 $
 $3
 $24
(*)Level 1 securities consist of actively traded stocks while Level 2 securities consist of pooled funds.

NOTES (continued)
Mississippi Power Company 2017 Annual Report

 Fair Value Measurements Using  
 Quoted Prices in Active Markets for Identical Assets Significant Other Observable Inputs Significant Unobservable Inputs Net Asset Value as a Practical Expedient  
As of December 31, 2016:(Level 1) (Level 2) (Level 3) (NAV) Total
 (in millions)
Assets:         
Domestic equity(*)
$4
 $2
 $
 $
 $6
International equity(*)
2
 2
 
 
 4
Fixed income:         
U.S. Treasury, government, and agency bonds
 5
 
 
 5
Corporate bonds
 2
 
 
 2
Pooled funds
 1
 
 
 1
Cash equivalents and other2
 
 
 
 2
Real estate investments1
 
 
 2
 3
Private equity
 
 
 1
 1
Total$9
 $12
 $
 $3
 $24
(*)Level 1 securities consist of actively traded stocks while Level 2 securities consist of pooled funds.
Employee Savings Plan
The Company also sponsors a 401(k) defined contribution plan covering substantially all employees. The Company matches a portion of the first 6% of employee base salary contributions. The maximum Company match is 5.1% of an employee's base salary. Total matching contributions made to the plan for 2017, 2016, and 2015 were $5 million each year.
3. CONTINGENCIES AND REGULATORY MATTERS
General Litigation Matters
The Company is subject to certain claims and legal actions arising in the ordinary course of business. In addition, the Company's business activities are subject to extensive governmental regulation related to public health and the environment, such as regulation of air emissions and water discharges. Litigation over environmental issues and claims of various types, including property damage, personal injury, common law nuisance, and citizen enforcement of environmental requirements such as standards for air, water, land, and protection of other natural resources, has occurred throughout the U.S. This litigation has included claims for damages alleged to have been caused by CO2 and other emissions, CCR, and alleged exposure to hazardous materials, and/or requests for injunctive relief in connection with such matters. The ultimate outcome of such pending or potential litigation against the Company cannot be predicted at this time; however, for current proceedings not specifically reported herein, management does not anticipate that the ultimate liabilities, if any, arising from such current proceedings would have a material effect on the Company's financial statements.
Environmental Matters
Environmental Remediation
The Company must comply with environmental laws and regulations governing the handling and disposal of waste and releases of hazardous substances. Under these various laws and regulations, the Company may also incur substantial costs to clean up affected sites. The Company has authority from the Mississippi PSC to recover approved environmental compliance costs through established regulatory mechanisms. The Company recognizes a liability for environmental remediation costs only when it determines a loss is probable and reasonably estimable.

NOTES (continued)
Mississippi Power Company 2017 Annual Report

FERC Matters
Municipal and Rural Associations Tariff
The Company provides wholesale electric service to Cooperative Energy, East Mississippi Electric Power Association, and the City of Collins, all located in southeastern Mississippi, under a long-term cost-based, FERC regulated MRA tariff.
In March 2016, the Company reached a settlement agreement with its wholesale customers, which was subsequently approved by the FERC, for an increase in wholesale base revenues under the MRA cost-based electric tariff, primarily as a result of placing scrubbers for Plant Daniel Units 1 and 2 in service in 2015. The settlement agreement became effective for services rendered beginning May 1, 2016, resulting in an estimated annual revenue increase of $7 million under the MRA cost-based electric tariff. Additionally, under the settlement agreement, the tariff customers agreed to similar regulatory treatment for MRA tariff ratemaking as the treatment approved for retail ratemaking through an order issued by the Mississippi PSC in December 2015 (In-Service Asset Rate Order). This regulatory treatment primarily includes (i) recovery of the operational Kemper County energy facility assets providing service to customers and other related costs, (ii) amortization of the Kemper County energy facility-related regulatory assets included in rates under the settlement agreement over the 36 months ending April 30, 2019, (iii) Kemper County energy facility-related expenses included in rates under the settlement agreement no longer being deferred and charged to expense, and (iv) removing all of the Kemper County energy facility CWIP from rate base with a corresponding increase in accrual of AFUDC. The additional resulting AFUDC totaled approximately $22 million through the suspension of Kemper IGCC start-up activities and has been recorded as a charge to income.
On September 18, 2017, the Company and Cooperative Energy executed a Shared Service Agreement (SSA), as part of the MRA tariff, under which the Company and Cooperative Energy will share in providing electricity to all Cooperative Energy delivery points, in lieu of the current arrangement under which each delivery point is specifically assigned to either entity. The SSA accepted by the FERC on October 31, 2017 became effective on January 1, 2018 and may be cancelled by Cooperative Energy with 10 years notice after December 31, 2020. The SSA provides Cooperative Energy the option to decrease its use of the Company's generation services under the MRA tariff, subject to annual and cumulative caps and a one-year notice requirement. In the event Cooperative Energy elects to reduce these services, the related reduction in the Company's revenues is not expected to be significant through 2020.
Fuel Cost Recovery
The Company has a wholesale MRA and a Market Based (MB) fuel cost recovery factor. At December 31, 2017, over-recovered wholesale MRA fuel costs were immaterial and at December 31, 2016 were approximately $13 million, and is included in over-recovered regulatory clause liabilities, current in the balance sheet. Effective January 1, 2018, the wholesale MRA fuel rate increased $11 million annually.
The Company's operating revenues are adjusted for differences in actual recoverable fuel cost and amounts billed in accordance with the currently approved cost recovery rate. Accordingly, changes in the billing factor should have no significant effect on the Company's revenues or net income, but will affect cash flow.
Market-Based Rate Authority
The Company has authority from the FERC to sell electricity at market-based rates. Since 2008, that authority, for certain balancing authority areas, has been conditioned on compliance with the requirements of an energy auction, which the FERC found to be tailored mitigation that addresses potential market power concerns. In accordance with FERC regulations governing such authority, the traditional electric operating companies (including the Company) and Southern Power filed a triennial market power analysis in 2014, which included continued reliance on the energy auction as tailored mitigation. In 2015, the FERC issued an order finding that the traditional electric operating companies' (including the Company's) and Southern Power's existing tailored mitigation may not effectively mitigate the potential to exert market power in certain areas served by the traditional electric operating companies and in some adjacent areas. The FERC directed the traditional electric operating companies (including the Company) and Southern Power to show why market-based rate authority should not be revoked in these areas or to provide a mitigation plan to further address market power concerns. The traditional electric operating companies (including the Company) and Southern Power filed a request for rehearing and filed their response with the FERC in 2015.
In December 2016, the traditional electric operating companies (including the Company) and Southern Power filed an amendment to their market-based rate tariff that proposed certain changes to the energy auction, as well as several non-tariff changes. On February 2, 2017, the FERC issued an order accepting all such changes subject to an additional condition of cost-based price caps for certain sales outside of the energy auction, finding that all of these changes would provide adequate alternative mitigation for the traditional electric operating companies' (including the Company's) and Southern Power's potential to exert market power in certain areas served by the traditional electric operating companies (including the Company) and in

NOTES (continued)
Mississippi Power Company 2017 Annual Report

some adjacent areas. On May 17, 2017, the FERC accepted the traditional electric operating companies' (including the Company's) and Southern Power's compliance filing accepting the terms of the order. While the FERC's February 2, 2017 order references the market power proceeding discussed above, it remains a separate, ongoing matter.
On October 25, 2017, the FERC issued an order in response to the traditional electric operating companies' (including the Company's) and Southern Power's June 29, 2017 triennial updated market power analysis. The FERC directed the traditional electric operating companies (including the Company) and Southern Power to show cause within 60 days why market-based rate authority should not be revoked in certain areas adjacent to the area presently under mitigation in accordance with the February 2, 2017 order or to provide a mitigation plan to further address market power concerns. On November 10, 2017, the traditional electric operating companies (including the Company) and Southern Power responded to the FERC and proposed to resolve matters by applying the alternative mitigation authorized by the February 2, 2017 order to the adjacent areas made the subject of the October 25, 2017 order.
The ultimate outcome of these matters cannot be determined at this time.
Cooperative Energy Power Supply Agreement
In 2008, the Company entered into a 10-year Power Supply Agreement (PSA) with Cooperative Energy for approximately 152 MWs, which became effective in 2011. Following certain plant retirements, the PSA capacity was reduced to 86 MWs. On February 5, 2018, the Company and Cooperative Energy executed an amendment to extend the PSA through March 31, 2021, effective April 1, 2018, with increased total capacity of 286 MWs.
Cooperative Energy also has a 10-year Network Integration Transmission Service Agreement (NITSA) with SCS for transmission service to certain delivery points on the Company's transmission system that became effective in 2011. As a result of the PSA amendments, Cooperative Energy and SCS amended the terms of the NITSA on January 12, 2018 to provide for the purchase of incremental transmission capacity for service beginning April 1, 2018 through March 31, 2021. This NITSA amendment remains subject to acceptance by the FERC. The ultimate outcome of these matters cannot be determined at this time.
Retail Regulatory Matters
General
In 2012, the Mississippi PSC issued an order for the purpose of investigating and reviewing, for informational purposes only, the ROE formulas used by the Company and all other regulated electric utilities in Mississippi. In 2013, the MPUS filed with the Mississippi PSC its report on the ROE formulas used by the Company and all other regulated electric utilities in Mississippi.
In 2014, the Mississippi PSC issued an order for the purpose of investigating and reviewing the adoption of a uniform formula rate plan for the Company and other regulated electric utilities in Mississippi.
On January 26, 2018, the Mississippi PSC issued an order directing utilities to file within 30 days information regarding the impact on rates resulting from Tax Reform Legislation. The Company's Kemper County energy facility rates, approved on February 6, 2018, include the effects of Tax Reform Legislation. The Company's 2018 ECO, revised 2018 PEP, and 2018 SRR rate filings, all submitted in February 2018, include the effects of Tax Reform Legislation and are subject to approval by the Mississippi PSC.
The ultimate outcome of these matters cannot be determined at this time.
Performance Evaluation Plan
The Company's retail base rates are set under the PEP, a rate plan approved by the Mississippi PSC. Two filings are made for each calendar year: the PEP projected filing, which is typically filed prior to the beginning of the year based on a projected revenue requirement, and the PEP lookback filing, which is filed after the end of the year and allows for review of the actual revenue requirement compared to the projected filing.
In 2011, the Company submitted its annual PEP lookback filing for 2010, which recommended no surcharge or refund. Later in 2011, the MPUS disputed certain items in the 2010 PEP lookback filing. In 2012, the Mississippi PSC issued an order canceling the Company's PEP lookback filing for 2011. In 2013, the MPUS contested the Company's PEP lookback filing for 2012, which indicated a refund due to customers of $5 million. Unresolved matters related to the 2010 PEP lookback filing, which remain under review, also impact the 2012 PEP lookback filing.
In 2013, the Mississippi PSC approved the projected PEP filing for 2013, which resulted in a rate increase of 1.9%, or $15 million, annually, effective March 19, 2013. The Company may be entitled to $3 million in additional revenues related to 2013 as a result of the late implementation of the 2013 PEP rate increase.

NOTES (continued)
Mississippi Power Company 2017 Annual Report

In 2014, 2015, 2016, and 2017, the Company submitted its annual PEP lookback filings for the prior years, which for 2013 and 2014 each indicated no surcharge or refund and for each of 2015 and 2016 indicated a $5 million surcharge. Additionally, in July 2016, in November 2016, and on November 15, 2017, the Company submitted its annual projected PEP filings for 2016, 2017, and 2018, respectively, which for 2016 and 2017 indicated no change in rates and for 2018 indicated a rate increase of 4%, or $38 million in annual revenues. The Mississippi PSC suspended each of these filings to allow more time for review.
On February 7, 2018, the Company revised its annual projected PEP filing for 2018 to reflect the impacts of Tax Reform Legislation. The revised filing requests an increase of $26 million in annual revenues, based on a performance adjusted ROE of 9.33% and an increased equity ratio of 55%. See Note 5 for additional information.
The ultimate outcome of these matters cannot be determined at this time.
Energy Efficiency
In 2013, the Mississippi PSC approved an energy efficiency and conservation rule requiring electric and gas utilities in Mississippi serving more than 25,000 customers to implement energy efficiency programs and standards. Quick Start Plans, which include a portfolio of energy efficiency programs that are intended to provide benefits to a majority of customers, were extended by an order issued by the Mississippi PSC in July 2016, until the time the Mississippi PSC approves a comprehensive portfolio plan program. The ultimate outcome of this matter cannot be determined at this time.
On July 6, 2017, the Mississippi PSC issued an order approving the Company's Energy Efficiency Cost Rider 2017 compliance filing, which increased annual retail revenues by approximately $2 million effective with the first billing cycle for August 2017.
On November 30, 2017, the Company submitted its Energy Efficiency Cost Rider 2018 compliance filing which included a small decrease in annual retail revenues. The ultimate outcome of this matter cannot be determined at this time.
Environmental Compliance Overview Plan
In 2012, the Mississippi PSC approved the Company's request for a CPCN to construct scrubbers on Plant Daniel Units 1 and 2, which were placed in service in 2015. These units are jointly owned by the Company and Gulf Power, with 50% ownership each. In 2014, the Company entered into a settlement agreement with the Sierra Club under which, among other things, the Company agreed to retire, repower with natural gas, or convert to an alternative non-fossil fuel source Plant Sweatt Units 1 and 2 (80 MWs) no later than December 2018 (and the units were retired in July 2016). The Company also agreed that it would cease burning coal and other solid fuel at Plant Watson Units 4 and 5 (750 MWs) and begin operating those units solely on natural gas no later than April 2015 (which occurred in April 2015) and cease burning coal and other solid fuel at Plant Greene County Units 1 and 2 (200 MWs) no later than April 2016 (which occurred in February and March 2016, respectively) and begin operating those units solely on natural gas (which occurred in June and July 2016, respectively).
In accordance with a 2011 accounting order from the Mississippi PSC, the Company has the authority to defer in a regulatory asset for future recovery all plant retirement- or partial retirement-related costs resulting from environmental regulations. The Mississippi PSC approved $41 million and $17 million of costs that were reclassified to regulatory assets associated with Plant Watson and Plant Greene County, respectively, for amortization over five-year periods that began in July 2016 and July 2017, respectively. As a result, these decisions are not expected to have a material impact on the Company's financial statements.
In August 2016, the Mississippi PSC approved the Company's revised ECO plan filing for 2016, which requested the maximum 2% annual increase in revenues, or approximately $18 million, primarily related to the Plant Daniel Units 1 and 2 scrubbers placed in service in 2015. The revised rates became effective with the first billing cycle for September 2016. Approximately $22 million of related revenue requirements in excess of the 2% maximum was deferred for inclusion in the 2017 filing, along with related carrying costs.
On May 4, 2017, the Mississippi PSC approved the Company's ECO plan filing for 2017, which requested the maximum 2% annual increase in revenues, or approximately $18 million, primarily related to the carryforward from the prior year. The rates became effective with the first billing cycle for June 2017. Approximately $26 million of related revenue requirements in excess of the 2% maximum was deferred for inclusion in the 2018 filing, along with related carrying costs.
On February 14, 2018, the Company submitted its ECO plan filing for 2018, including the effects of Tax Reform Legislation, which requested the maximum 2% annual increase in revenues, or approximately $17 million, primarily related to the carryforward from the prior year. Approximately $13 million of related revenue requirements in excess of the 2% maximum, along with related carrying costs, remains deferred for inclusion in the 2019 filing. The ultimate outcome of this matter cannot be determined at this time.

NOTES (continued)
Mississippi Power Company 2017 Annual Report

Fuel Cost Recovery
The Company establishes, annually, a retail fuel cost recovery factor that is approved by the Mississippi PSC. The Company is required to file for an adjustment to the retail fuel cost recovery factor annually. On January 12, 2017, the Mississippi PSC approved the 2017 retail fuel cost recovery factor, effective February 2017 through January 2018, which resulted in an annual revenue increase of approximately $55 million. On November 15, 2017, the Company filed its annual rate adjustment under the retail fuel cost recovery clause, requesting an additional increase of $39 million annually, which the Mississippi PSC approved on January 16, 2018 effective February 2018 through January 2019. At December 31, 2017, the amount of under-recovered retail fuel costs included in the balance sheet in customer accounts receivable was approximately $6 million compared to $37 million over recovered at December 31, 2016.
The Company's operating revenues are adjusted for differences in actual recoverable fuel cost and amounts billed in accordance with the currently approved cost recovery rate. Accordingly, changes in the billing factor should have no significant effect on the Company's revenues or net income, but will affect cash flow.
Ad Valorem Tax Adjustment
The Company establishes, annually, an ad valorem tax adjustment factor that is approved by the Mississippi PSC to collect the ad valorem taxes paid by the Company. On July 6, 2017, the Mississippi PSC approved the Company's annual ad valorem tax adjustment factor filing for 2017, which included an annual rate increase of 0.85%, or $8 million in annual retail revenues, primarily due to increased assessments.
System Restoration Rider
In February 2016, the Company submitted its 2016 SRR rate filing which proposed no changes to either the SRR rate or the annual property damage reserve accrual of $3 million annually. On February 3, 2017, the Company submitted its 2017 SRR rate filing, which proposed an increase in the property damage reserve accrual of $1 million. These filings were suspended by the Mississippi PSC for review.
On January 21, 2017, a tornado caused extensive damage to the Company's transmission and distribution infrastructure. Storm damage repairs were approximately $9 million. A portion of these costs was charged to the retail property damage reserve and was addressed in the 2018 SRR rate filing.
On February 1, 2018, the Company submitted its 2018 SRR rate filing, including the effects of Tax Reform Legislation, which proposed that the SRR rate remain at zero and the annual accrual for the property damage reserve be reduced to $2 million in 2018.
The ultimate outcome of these matters cannot be determined at this time. See Note 1 under "Provision for Property Damage" for additional information.
Storm Damage Cost Recovery
In connection with the damage associated with Hurricane Katrina, the Mississippi PSC authorized the issuance of system restoration bonds in 2006. In accordance with a Mississippi PSC order on January 24, 2017, the Company eliminated the applicable Storm Restoration Charge because the bond sinking fund managed by the Mississippi State Bond Commission is substantially funded.
Kemper County Energy Facility
Overview
The Kemper County energy facility was designed to utilize IGCC technology with an expected output capacity of 582 MWs and to be fueled by locally mined lignite (an abundant, lower heating value coal) from a mine owned by the Company and situated adjacent to the Kemper County energy facility. The mine, operated by North American Coal Corporation, started commercial operation in 2013. In connection with the Kemper County energy facility construction, the Company constructed approximately 61 miles of CO2 pipeline infrastructure for the transport of captured CO2 for use in enhanced oil recovery.
Schedule and Cost Estimate
In 2012, the Mississippi PSC issued the 2012 MPSC CPCN Order, confirming the CPCN originally approved by the Mississippi PSC in 2010 authorizing the acquisition, construction, and operation of the Kemper County energy facility. The certificated cost estimate of the Kemper County energy facility included in the 2012 MPSC CPCN Order was $2.4 billion, net of approximately $0.57 billion for the cost of the lignite mine and equipment, the cost of the CO2 pipeline facilities, AFUDC, and certain general

NOTES (continued)
Mississippi Power Company 2017 Annual Report

exceptions (Cost Cap Exceptions). The 2012 MPSC CPCN Order approved a construction cost cap of up to $2.88 billion, with recovery of prudently-incurred costs subject to approval by the Mississippi PSC. The Kemper County energy facility was originally projected to be placed in service in May 2014. The Company placed the combined cycle and the associated common facilities portion of the Kemper County energy facility in service in August 2014.
The initial production of syngas began on July 14, 2016 for gasifier "B" and on September 13, 2016 for gasifier "A." The Company achieved integrated operation of both gasifiers on January 29, 2017, including the production of electricity from syngas in both combustion turbines. During testing, the plant produced and captured CO2, and produced sulfuric acid and ammonia, each of acceptable quality under the related off-take agreements. However, the Company experienced numerous challenges during the extended start-up process to achieve integrated operation of the gasifiers on a sustained basis. In May 2017, after achieving these milestones, the Company determined that a critical system component, the syngas coolers, would need replacement sooner than originally planned, which would require significant lead time and significant cost. In addition, the long-term natural gas price forecast had decreased significantly and the estimated cost of operating and maintaining the facility during the first five full years of operations had increased significantly since certification.
On June 21, 2017, the Mississippi PSC stated its intent to issue an order (which occurred on July 6, 2017) directing the Company to pursue a settlement under which the Kemper County energy facility would be operated as a natural gas plant, rather than an IGCC plant, and address all issues associated with the Kemper County energy facility (Kemper Settlement Order). The Kemper Settlement Order established a new docket for the purposes of pursuing a global settlement of the related costs (Kemper Settlement Docket). On June 28, 2017, the Company notified the Mississippi PSC that it would begin a process to suspend operations and start-up activities on the gasifier portion of the Kemper County energy facility, given the uncertainty as to its future. On February 6, 2018, the Mississippi PSC voted to approve a settlement agreement related to cost recovery for the Kemper County energy facility among the Company, the MPUS, and certain intervenors (Kemper Settlement Agreement).
At the time of project suspension in June 2017, the total cost estimate for the Kemper County energy facility was approximately $7.38 billion, including approximately $5.95 billion of costs subject to the construction cost cap, and was net of the $137 million in Additional DOE Grants. In the aggregate, the Company had recorded charges to income of $3.07 billion ($1.89 billion after tax) as a result of changes in the cost estimate above the cost cap for the Kemper IGCC through May 31, 2017.
Given the Mississippi PSC's stated intent regarding no further rate increase for the Kemper County energy facility and the subsequent suspension, cost recovery of the gasifier portions became no longer probable; therefore, the Company recorded an additional charge to income in June 2017 of $2.8 billion ($2.0 billion after tax), which included estimated costs associated with the gasifier portions of the plant and lignite mine. During the third and fourth quarters of 2017, the Company recorded charges to income of $242 million ($206 million after tax), including $164 million for ongoing project costs, estimated mine and gasifier-related costs, and certain termination costs during the suspension period prior to conclusion of the Kemper Settlement Docket, as well as the charge associated with the Kemper Settlement Agreement discussed below. Additional pre-tax cancellation costs, including mine and plant closure and contract termination costs, currently estimated at approximately $50 million to $100 million (excluding salvage), are expected to be incurred in 2018. The Company has begun efforts to dispose of or abandon the mine and gasifier-related assets.
Rate Recovery
Kemper Settlement Agreement
On February 6, 2018, the Mississippi PSC voted to approve the Kemper Settlement Agreement. The Kemper Settlement Agreement provides for an annual revenue requirement of approximately $99.3 million for costs related to the Kemper County energy facility, which includes the impact of Tax Reform Legislation. The revenue requirement is based on (i) a fixed ROE for 2018 of 8.6% excluding any performance adjustment, (ii) a ROE for 2019 calculated in accordance with PEP, excluding the performance adjustment, (iii) for future years, a performance-based ROE calculated pursuant to PEP, and (iv) amortization periods for the related regulatory assets and liabilities of eight years and six years, respectively. The revenue requirement also reflects a disallowance related to a portion of the Company's investment in the Kemper County energy facility requested for inclusion in rate base, which was recorded in the fourth quarter 2017 as an additional charge to income of approximately $78 million ($85 million net of accumulated depreciation of $7 million) pre-tax ($48 million after tax).
Under the Kemper Settlement Agreement, retail customer rates will reflect a reduction of approximately $26.8 million annually and include no recovery for costs associated with the gasifier portion of the Kemper County energy facility in 2018 or at any future date. On February 12, 2018, the Company made the required compliance filing with the Mississippi PSC. The Kemper Settlement Agreement also requires (i) the CPCN for the Kemper County energy facility to be modified to limit it to natural gas combined cycle operation and (ii) the Company to file a reserve margin plan with the Mississippi PSC by August 2018.

NOTES (continued)
Mississippi Power Company 2017 Annual Report

As of December 31, 2017, the balances associated with the Kemper County energy facility regulatory assets and liabilities were $114 million and $26 million, respectively.
As a result of the Mississippi PSC order on February 6, 2018, rate recovery for the Kemper County energy facility is resolved, subject to any future legal challenges.
2015 Rate Case
On December 3, 2015, the Mississippi PSC issued the In-Service Asset Rate Order regarding the Kemper County energy facility assets that were commercially operational and currently providing service to customers (the transmission facilities, combined cycle, natural gas pipeline, and water pipeline) and other related costs. The In-Service Asset Rate Order provided for retail rate recovery of an annual revenue requirement of approximately $126 million, based on the Company's actual average capital structure, with a maximum common equity percentage of 49.733%, a 9.225% return on common equity, and actual embedded interest costs. The In-Service Asset Rate Order also included a prudence finding of all costs in the stipulated revenue requirement calculation for the in-service assets.
In connection with the implementation of the In-Service Asset Rate Order and wholesale rates, the Company began expensing certain ongoing project costs and certain retail debt carrying costs that previously were deferred and began amortizing certain regulatory assets associated with assets placed in service and consulting and legal fees over periods ranging from two years to 10 years. On July 6, 2017, the Mississippi PSC issued an order requiring the Company to establish a regulatory liability account to maintain current rates related to the Kemper County energy facility following the July 2017 completion of the amortization period for certain of these regulatory assets. See "FERC Matters" herein for additional information related to the 2016 settlement agreement with wholesale customers.
Lignite Mine and CO2 Pipeline Facilities
The Company owns the lignite mine and equipment and mineral reserves located around the Kemper County energy facility site. The mine started commercial operation in June 2013.
In 2010, the Company executed a 40-year management fee contract with Liberty Fuels Company, LLC (Liberty Fuels), a wholly-owned subsidiary of The North American Coal Corporation, which developed, constructed, and is responsible for the mining operations through the end of the mine reclamation. As the mining permit holder, Liberty Fuels has a legal obligation to perform mine reclamation and the Company has a contractual obligation to fund all reclamation activities. The Company expects mine reclamation to begin in 2018. In addition to the obligation to fund the reclamation activities, the Company provided working capital support to Liberty Fuels through cash advances for capital purchases, payroll, and other operating expenses. See Note 1 under "Asset Retirement Obligations and Other Costs of Removal" and "Variable Interest Entities" for additional information.
In addition, the Company constructed the CO2 pipeline for the planned transport of captured CO2 for use in enhanced oil recovery and entered into an agreement with Denbury Onshore (Denbury) to purchase the captured CO2. Denbury has the right to terminate the contract at any time because the Company did not place the Kemper IGCC in service by July 1, 2017.
The ultimate outcome of these matters cannot be determined at this time.
Litigation
On April 26, 2016, a complaint against the Company was filed in Harrison County Circuit Court (Circuit Court) by Biloxi Freezing & Processing Inc., Gulfside Casino Partnership, and John Carlton Dean, which was amended and refiled on July 11, 2016 to include, among other things, Southern Company as a defendant. The individual plaintiff alleges that the Company and Southern Company violated the Mississippi Unfair Trade Practices Act. All plaintiffs have alleged that the Company and Southern Company concealed, falsely represented, and failed to fully disclose important facts concerning the cost and schedule of the Kemper County energy facility and that these alleged breaches have unjustly enriched the Company and Southern Company. The plaintiffs seek unspecified actual damages and punitive damages; ask the Circuit Court to appoint a receiver to oversee, operate, manage, and otherwise control all affairs relating to the Kemper County energy facility; ask the Circuit Court to revoke any licenses or certificates authorizing the Company or Southern Company to engage in any business related to the Kemper County energy facility in Mississippi; and seek attorney's fees, costs, and interest. The plaintiffs also seek an injunction to prevent any Kemper County energy facility costs from being charged to customers through electric rates. On June 23, 2017, the Circuit Court ruled in favor of motions by Southern Company and the Company and dismissed the case. On July 7, 2017, the plaintiffs filed notice of an appeal. The Company believes this legal challenge has no merit; however, an adverse outcome in this proceeding could have a material impact on the Company's results of operations, financial condition, and liquidity. The Company intends to vigorously defend itself in this matter and the ultimate outcome of this matter cannot be determined at this time.

NOTES (continued)
Mississippi Power Company 2017 Annual Report

On June 9, 2016, Treetop, Greenleaf CO2 Solutions, LLC (Greenleaf), Tenrgys, LLC, Tellus Energy, LLC, WCOA, LLC, and Tellus Operating Group filed a complaint against the Company, Southern Company, and SCS in the state court in Gwinnett County, Georgia. The complaint related to the cancelled CO2 contract with Treetop and alleged fraudulent misrepresentation, fraudulent concealment, civil conspiracy, and breach of contract on the part of the Company, Southern Company, and SCS and sought compensatory damages of $100 million, as well as unspecified punitive damages. Southern Company, the Company, and SCS moved to compel arbitration pursuant to the terms of the CO2 contract, which the court granted on May 4, 2017. On June 28, 2017, Treetop, Greenleaf, Tenrgys, LLC, Tellus Energy, LLC, WCOA, LLC, and Tellus Operating Group filed a claim for arbitration requesting $500 million in damages. On December 28, 2017, the Company reached a settlement agreement with Treetop, Greenleaf, Tenrgys, LLC, Tellus Energy, LLC, WCOA, LLC, and Tellus Operating Group and the arbitration was dismissed.
4. JOINT OWNERSHIP AGREEMENTS
The Company and Alabama Power own, as tenants in common, Units 1 and 2 (total capacity of 500 MWs) at Greene County Steam Plant, which is located in Alabama and operated by Alabama Power. Additionally, the Company and Gulf Power, own as tenants in common, Units 1 and 2 (total capacity of 1,000 MWs) at Plant Daniel, which is located in Mississippi and operated by the Company. At December 31, 2017, the Company's percentage ownership and investment in these jointly-owned facilities in commercial operation were as follows:
Generating
Plant
Company
Ownership
 Plant in Service 
Accumulated
Depreciation
 CWIP
   (in millions)  
Greene County       
Units 1 and 240% $164
 $55
 $1
Daniel       
Units 1 and 250% $713
 $189
 $4
The Company's proportionate share of plant operating expenses is included in the statements of operations and the Company is responsible for providing its own financing.
5. INCOME TAXES
On behalf of the Company, Southern Company files a consolidated federal income tax return and various combined and separate state income tax returns. Under a joint consolidated income tax allocation agreement, each Southern Company subsidiary's current and deferred tax expense is computed on a stand-alone basis and no subsidiary is allocated more current expense than would be paid if it filed a separate income tax return. In accordance with IRS regulations, each company is jointly and severally liable for the federal tax liability.
Federal Tax Reform Legislation
Following the enactment of Tax Reform Legislation, the SEC staff issued Staff Accounting Bulletin 118 – "Income Tax Accounting Implications of the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act" (SAB 118), which provides for a measurement period of up to one year from the enactment date to complete accounting under GAAP for the tax effects of the legislation. Due to the complex and comprehensive nature of the enacted tax law changes, and their application under GAAP, the Company considers all amounts recorded in the financial statements as a result of Tax Reform Legislation to be "provisional" as discussed in SAB 118 and subject to revision. The Company is awaiting additional guidance from industry and income tax authorities in order to finalize its accounting. The ultimate impact of Tax Reform Legislation on deferred income tax assets and liabilities and the related regulatory assets and liabilities cannot be determined at this time. See Note 3 under "Regulatory Matters" for additional information.

NOTES (continued)
Mississippi Power Company 2017 Annual Report

Current and Deferred Income Taxes
Details of income tax provisions are as follows:
 2017 2016 2015
 (in millions)
Federal —     
Current$194
 $(31) $(768)
Deferred(753) (60) 704
 (559) (91) (64)
State —     
Current
 (6) (81)
Deferred27
 (7) 73
 27
 (13) (8)
Total$(532) $(104) $(72)

NOTES (continued)
Mississippi Power Company 2017 Annual Report

The tax effects of temporary differences between the carrying amounts of assets and liabilities in the financial statements and their respective tax bases, which give rise to deferred tax assets and liabilities, are as follows:
 2017 2016
 (in millions)
Deferred tax liabilities —   
Accelerated depreciation$373
 $386
Property basis difference242
 852
Regulatory assets associated with AROs34
 72
Pensions and other benefits28
 49
Regulatory assets associated with employee benefit obligations45
 70
Regulatory assets associated with the Kemper County energy facility31
 82
Regulatory assets associated with Plant Daniel9
 13
Rate differential
 141
Federal effect of state deferred taxes9
 
Ad valorem over/under recovery11
 14
Regulatory assets for Mercury and Air Toxics Standards compliance11
 8
Other11
 91
Total804
 1,778
Deferred tax assets —   
Fuel clause over recovered
 26
Estimated loss on Kemper IGCC722
 484
Pension and other benefits62
 96
Federal NOL40
 109
Property insurance15
 27
Premium on long-term debt7
 14
AROs34
 72
Property basis difference70
 
Affirmative adjustments31
 
Regulatory liability associated with Tax Reform Legislation (not subject to normalization)
27
 
Deferred state tax assets133
 113
Deferred federal tax assets
 31
Federal effect of state deferred taxes
 19
Other32
 31
Total1,173
 1,022
Valuation allowance (net of $35 million in federal benefit)122
 
Accumulated deferred income tax (assets)/liabilities

(247) 756
The implementation of Tax Reform Legislation significantly reduced accumulated deferred income taxes, partially offset by bonus depreciation provisions in the Protecting Americans from Tax Hikes Act. Tax Reform Legislation also significantly reduced tax-related regulatory assets and increased tax-related regulatory liabilities.
At December 31, 2017, the tax-related regulatory assets were $36 million. These assets are primarily attributable to tax benefits flowed through to customers in prior years, deferred taxes previously recognized at rates lower than the current enacted tax law, and taxes applicable to capitalized interest.
At December 31, 2017, the tax-related regulatory liabilities were $376 million. These liabilities are primarily attributable to deferred taxes previously recognized at rates higher than the current enacted tax law and unamortized ITCs.

NOTES (continued)
Mississippi Power Company 2017 Annual Report

In accordance with regulatory requirements, deferred federal ITCs are amortized over the life of the related property with such amortization normally applied as a credit to reduce depreciation in the statements of operations. Credits for non-Kemper County energy facility related deferred ITCs amortized in this manner amounted to $1 million in each of 2017, 2016, and 2015.
At December 31, 2017, the Company had state of Mississippi NOL carryforwards totaling approximately $2.8 billion, resulting in deferred tax assets of approximately $111 million. The NOLs will expire between 2031 and 2037.
Effective Tax Rate
A reconciliation of the federal statutory income tax rate to the effective income tax rate is as follows:
 2017 2016 2015
Federal statutory rate(35.0)% (35.0)% (35.0)%
State income tax, net of federal deduction0.6
 (5.7) (6.3)
Non-deductible book depreciation0.1
 0.7
 1.3
AFUDC-equity
 (28.5) (49.6)
Non-deductible equity portion on Kemper IGCC write-off5.3
 
 
Tax Reform Legislation11.9
 
 
Other
 
 (2.9)
Effective income tax rate (benefit rate)(17.1)% (68.5)% (92.5)%
The decrease in the Company's 2017 effective tax rate (benefit rate), as compared to 2016, is primarily due to an increase in estimated losses associated with the Kemper IGCC, a decrease in non-taxable AFUDC equity, and a decrease due to the remeasurement of deferred income taxes resulting from Tax Reform Legislation. The decrease in the Company's 2016 effective tax rate (benefit rate), as compared to 2015, is primarily due to an increase in estimated losses associated with the Kemper IGCC and an increase in non-taxable AFUDC equity.
Tax Reform Legislation reduced the corporate income tax rate from 35% to 21%. As a result of implementation, the Company restated future tax benefits/deductions recorded as deferred tax assets/liabilities to reflect the new rate. The implementation resulted in a $372 million increase in tax expense and a $375 million increase in regulatory liabilities.
In March 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-09, which changed the accounting for income taxes for share-based payment award transactions. Entities are required to recognize all excess tax benefits and deficiencies related to the exercise or vesting of stock compensation as income tax expense or benefit in the income statement. The adoption of ASU 2016-09 did not have a material impact on the Company's overall effective tax rate. See Note 1 under "Recently Issued Accounting Standards" for additional information.
Unrecognized Tax Benefits
Changes during the year in unrecognized tax benefits were as follows:
 2017 2016 2015
 (in millions)
Unrecognized tax benefits at beginning of year$465
 $421
 $165
Tax positions increase from current periods
 26
 32
Tax positions increase from prior periods2
 18
 224
Tax positions decrease from prior periods(177) 
 
Reductions due to settlements(290) 
 
Balance at end of year$
 $465
 $421

NOTES (continued)
Mississippi Power Company 2017 Annual Report

The tax positions increases from current periods and prior periods for 2017, 2016 and 2015 relate to state tax benefits, deductions for R&E expenditures, and charitable contribution carryforwards that were impacted as a result of the settlement of R&E expenditures associated with the Kemper County energy facility, as well as federal income tax benefits from deferred ITCs. The tax positions decrease from prior periods and reductions due to settlements for 2017 relate primarily to the settlement of R&E expenditures associated with the Kemper County energy facility. See "Section 174 Research and Experimental Deduction" herein for additional information. These amounts are presented on a gross basis without considering the related federal or state income tax impact.
The impact on the Company's effective tax rate, if recognized, is as follows:
 2017 2016 2015
 (in millions)
Tax positions impacting the effective tax rate$
 $1
 $(2)
Tax positions not impacting the effective tax rate
 464
 423
Balance of unrecognized tax benefits$
 $465
 $421
The tax positions not impacting the effective tax rate primarily relate to state tax benefits and charitable contribution carryforwards that were impacted as a result of the settlement of R&E expenditures associated with the Kemper County energy facility. See "Section 174 Research and Experimental Deduction" herein for additional information.
Accrued interest for unrecognized tax benefits was as follows:
 2017 2016 2015
 (in millions)
Interest accrued at beginning of year$28
 $13
 $3
Interest accrued during the year(28) 15
 10
Balance at end of year$
 $28
 $13
The Company classifies interest on tax uncertainties as interest expense. The Company did not accrue any penalties on uncertain tax positions.
It is reasonably possible that the amount of the unrecognized tax benefits could change within 12 months. The settlement of federal and state audits could impact the balances significantly. At this time, an estimate of the range of reasonably possible outcomes cannot be determined.
The IRS has finalized its audits of Southern Company's consolidated federal income tax returns through 2016. Southern Company is a participant in the Compliance Assurance Process of the IRS. The audits for the Company's state income tax returns have either been concluded, or the statute of limitations has expired, for years prior to 2011.
Section 174 Research and Experimental Deduction
Southern Company, on behalf of the Company, has reflected deductions for R&E expenditures related to the Kemper County energy facility in its federal income tax calculations since 2013 and filed amended federal income tax returns for 2008 through 2013 to also include such deductions. In December 2016, Southern Company and the IRS reached a proposed settlement, which was approved on September 8, 2017 by the U.S. Congress Joint Committee on Taxation (JCT), resolving a methodology for these deductions. As a result of the JCT approval, Southern Company recognized $176 million of previously unrecognized tax benefits and reversed $36 million of associated accrued interest.
6. FINANCING
Going Concern
The Company's financial statement presentation contemplates continuation of the Company as a going concern as a result of Southern Company's anticipated ongoing financial support of the Company. Specifically, the Company has been informed by Southern Company that in the event sufficient funds are not available from external sources, Southern Company intends to provide the Company with loans and/or equity to fund the remaining indebtedness to mature and other cash needs over the next 12 months. As of December 31, 2017, the Company's current liabilities exceeded current assets by approximately $911 million primarily due to a $900 million unsecured term loan that matures on March 31, 2018. The Company expects to refinance the unsecured term loan with external security issuances and/or borrowings from financial institutions or Southern Company. To fund

NOTES (continued)
Mississippi Power Company 2017 Annual Report

the Company's capital needs over the next 12 months, the Company intends to utilize operating cash flows, external security issuances, lines of credit, bank term loans, equity contributions from Southern Company and, to the extent necessary, loans from Southern Company.
Securities Due Within One Year
A summary of scheduled maturities and redemptions of securities due within one year at December 31, 2017 and 2016 was as follows:
 2017 2016
 (in millions)
Parent company loans$
 $551
Senior notes
 35
Bank term loans900
 
Revenue bonds(*)
90
 40
Capitalized leases
 3
Unamortized debt issuance expense

(1) 
Outstanding at December 31$989
 $629
(*)Includes $50 million in revenue bonds classified as short term at December 31, 2017 that were remarketed in an index rate mode subsequent to December 31, 2017. Also includes $40 million in pollution control revenue bonds classified as short term since they are variable rate demand obligations supported by short-term credit facilities; however, the final maturity dates range from 2020 to 2028.
Maturities through 2022 applicable to total long-term debt are as follows: $900 million in 2018, $125 million in 2019, and $270 million in 2021. For long-term debt, other than revenue bonds, there are no scheduled maturities for 2020 and 2022.
Parent Company Loans and Equity Contributions
At December 31, 2016, the Company had $551 million of outstanding promissory notes to Southern Company.
In February 2017, the Company amended $551 million in promissory notes to Southern Company extending the maturity dates of the notes from December 1, 2017 to July 31, 2018. In the second quarter 2017, the Company borrowed an additional $40 million under a promissory note issued to Southern Company.
In June 2017, Southern Company made equity contributions totaling $1.0 billion to the Company. The Company used a portion of the proceeds to (i) prepay $300 million of the outstanding principal amount under its $1.2 billion unsecured term loan, which matures on March 30, 2018; (ii) repay all of the $591 million outstanding principal amount of promissory notes to Southern Company; and (iii) repay a $10 million short-term bank loan.
In September 2017, the Company issued a floating rate promissory note to Southern Company in an aggregate principal amount of up to $150 million bearing interest based on one-month LIBOR. The Company borrowed $109 million under this promissory note primarily to satisfy its federal income tax obligations for the quarter ending September 30, 2017 and subsequently repaid the promissory note upon receipt of its income tax refund from the U.S. federal government related to the settlement concerning deductible R&E expenditures. See Note 5 under "Section 174 Research and Experimental Deduction" for additional information. At December 31, 2017, the Company had no outstanding promissory notes to Southern Company.
Bank Term Loans
In March 2017, the Company issued a $9 million short-term bank note bearing interest at 5% per annum, which was repaid in April 2017.
In June 2017, the Company used a portion of the proceeds from Southern Company equity contributions to prepay $300 million of the outstanding principal amount under its $1.2 billion unsecured term loan, which matures on March 30, 2018, and to repay $10 million of the outstanding principal amount of bank loans. See "Parent Company Loans and Equity Contributions" herein for more information.
This unsecured term loan has a covenant that limits debt levels to 65% of total capitalization, as defined in the agreement. For purposes of this definition, debt excludes any long-term debt payable to affiliated trusts and other hybrid securities. At December 31, 2017, the Company was in compliance with its debt limit.
In August 2017, the Company repaid a $12.5 million short-term bank note.

NOTES (continued)
Mississippi Power Company 2017 Annual Report

At December 31, 2017, the Company had a $900 million unsecured term loan outstanding, which was reflected in the statements of capitalization as securities due within one year. At December 31, 2016, the Company had a $1.2 billion unsecured term loan outstanding, which was reflected in the statements of capitalization as long-term debt.
Senior Notes
At December 31, 2017 and 2016, the Company had $755 million and $790 million of senior notes outstanding, respectively, which included senior notes due within one year. These senior notes are effectively subordinated to the secured debt of the Company. See "Plant Daniel Revenue Bonds" below for additional information regarding the Company's secured indebtedness.
Plant Daniel Revenue Bonds
In 2011, in connection with the Company's election under its operating lease of Plant Daniel Units 3 and 4 to purchase the assets, the Company assumed the obligations of the lessor related to $270 million aggregate principal amount of Mississippi Business Finance Corporation Taxable Revenue Bonds, 7.13% Series 1999A due October 20, 2021, issued for the benefit of the lessor. These bonds are secured by Plant Daniel Units 3 and 4 and certain related personal property. The bonds were recorded at fair value as of the date of assumption, or $346 million, reflecting a premium of $76 million. See "Assets Subject to Lien" herein for additional information.
Pollution Control Revenue Bonds
Pollution control obligations represent loans to the Company from public authorities of funds derived from sales by such authorities of pollution control revenue bonds issued to finance pollution control and solid waste disposal facilities. The Company is required to make payments sufficient for the authorities to meet principal and interest requirements of such bonds. The amount of tax-exempt pollution control revenue bonds outstanding at December 31, 2017 and 2016 was $83 million.
Other Revenue Bonds
Other revenue bond obligations represent loans to the Company from a public authority of funds derived from the sale by such authority of revenue bonds issued to finance a portion of the costs of constructing the Kemper County energy facility and related facilities.
The Company had $50 million of such obligations outstanding related to tax-exempt revenue bonds at December 31, 2017 and 2016. Such amounts are reflected in the statements of capitalization as long-term debt.
Capital Leases
In 2013, the Company entered into an agreement to sell the air separation unit for the Kemper County energy facility and also entered into a 20-year nitrogen supply agreement. The nitrogen supply agreement was determined to be a sale/leaseback agreement, which resulted in a capital lease obligation of $74 million at December 31, 2016. Following the suspension of the Kemper IGCC, the Company entered into an asset purchase and settlement agreement in December 2017 with the lessor, which terminated the capital lease obligation. There were no contingent rentals in the contract and a portion of the monthly payment specified in the agreement was related to executory costs for the operation and maintenance of the air separation unit and excluded from the minimum lease payments. The minimum lease payments for 2017 were $7 million. See Note 3 under "Kemper County Energy facility" for additional information.
Assets Subject to Lien
The revenue bonds assumed in conjunction with the purchase of Plant Daniel Units 3 and 4 are secured by Plant Daniel Units 3 and 4 and certain related personal property. There are no agreements or other arrangements among the Southern Company system companies under which the assets of one company have been pledged or otherwise made available to satisfy the obligations of Southern Company or another of its other subsidiaries. See "Plant Daniel Revenue Bonds" herein for additional information.
On October 4, 2017, the Company executed agreements with its largest retail customer, Chevron Products Company (Chevron), to continue providing retail service to the Chevron refinery in Pascagoula, Mississippi through 2038, subject to the approval of the Mississippi PSC. The agreements grant Chevron a security interest in its co-generation assets, with a net book value of approximately $93 million, located at Chevron's refinery that is exercisable upon the occurrence of (i) certain bankruptcy events or (ii) other events of default coupled with specific reductions in steam output at the facility and a downgrade of the Company's credit rating to below investment grade by two of the three rating agencies.

NOTES (continued)
Mississippi Power Company 2017 Annual Report

Outstanding Classes of Capital Stock
The Company currently has preferred stock (including depositary shares which represent one-fourth of a share of preferred stock) and common stock authorized and outstanding. The preferred stock of the Company contains a feature that allows the holders to elect a majority of the Company's board of directors if preferred dividends are not paid for four consecutive quarters. Because such a potential redemption-triggering event is not solely within the control of the Company, this preferred stock is presented as "Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Stock" in a manner consistent with temporary equity under applicable accounting standards. The Company's preferred stock and depositary preferred stock, without preference between classes, rank senior to the Company's common stock with respect to payment of dividends and voluntary or involuntary dissolution. The preferred stock and depositary preferred stock is subject to redemption at the option of the Company at a redemption price equal to 100% of the liquidation amount of the stock. Information for each outstanding series is in the table below:
Preferred StockPar Value/Stated Capital Per Share Shares Outstanding Redemption Price Per Share
4.40% Preferred Stock$100
 8,867
 $104.32
4.60% Preferred Stock$100
 8,643
 $107.00
4.72% Preferred Stock$100
 16,700
 $102.25
5.25% Preferred Stock(*)
$100
 300,000
 $100.00
(*)There are 1,200,000 outstanding depositary shares, each representing one-fourth of a share of the 5.25% preferred stock.
Dividend Restrictions
The Company can only pay dividends to Southern Company out of retained earnings or paid-in-capital.
Bank Credit Arrangements
At December 31, 2017, committed credit arrangements with banks were as follows:
Expires     
Executable
Term Loans
 Expires Within One Year
2018 Total Unused 
One
Year
 
Two
Years
 Term Out No Term Out
(in millions) (in millions) (in millions) (in millions)
$100 $100 $100 $— $— $— $100
In November 2017, the Company amended certain of its one-year credit arrangements in an aggregate amount of $100 million to extend the maturity dates from 2017 to 2018.
Subject to applicable market conditions, the Company expects to renew its bank credit arrangements, as needed, prior to expiration. In connection therewith, the Company may extend the maturity dates and/or increase or decrease the lending commitments thereunder.
Most of these bank credit arrangements require payment of commitment fees based on the unused portions of the commitments or to maintain compensating balances with the banks. Commitment fees average less than 1/4 of 1% for the Company. Compensating balances are not legally restricted from withdrawal.
Most of these bank credit arrangements contain covenants that limit the Company's debt levels to 65% of total capitalization, as defined in the agreements. For purposes of these definitions, debt excludes certain hybrid securities.
A portion of the $100 million unused credit with banks is allocated to provide liquidity support to the Company's pollution control revenue bonds and its commercial paper borrowings. The amount of variable rate pollution control revenue bonds outstanding requiring liquidity support as of December 31, 2017 was $40 million. In addition, at December 31, 2017, the Company had approximately $50 million of fixed rate revenue bonds that were remarketed from a long-term interest rate mode to an index rate mode, subsequent to December 31, 2017.
At December 31, 2017 and 2016, there was no commercial paper debt outstanding.
At December 31, 2017 and 2016, there was $4 million and $23 million, respectively, of short-term debt outstanding.

NOTES (continued)
Mississippi Power Company 2017 Annual Report

7. COMMITMENTS
Fuel and Purchased Power Agreements
To supply a portion of the fuel requirements of its generating plants, the Company has entered into various long-term commitments for the procurement and delivery of fossil fuel which are not recognized on the balance sheets. In 2017, 2016, and 2015, the Company incurred fuel expense of $395 million, $343 million, and $443 million, respectively, the majority of which was purchased under long-term commitments. The Company expects that a substantial amount of its future fuel needs will continue to be purchased under long-term commitments.
SCS may enter into various types of wholesale energy and natural gas contracts acting as an agent for the Company and all of the other traditional electric operating companies and Southern Power. Under these agreements, each of the traditional electric operating companies and Southern Power may be jointly and severally liable. Accordingly, Southern Company has entered into keep-well agreements with the Company and each of the other traditional electric operating companies to ensure the Company will not subsidize or be responsible for any costs, losses, liabilities, or damages resulting from the inclusion of Southern Power as a contracting party under these agreements.
In addition, the Company has entered into various long-term commitments for the purchase of energy through PPAs associated with solar facilities. The energy related costs associated with PPAs are recovered through the fuel cost recovery clause.
Operating Leases
The Company has entered into operating leases with Southern Linc and third parties for the use of cellular tower space. These agreements have initial terms ranging from five to 10 years and renewal options of up to 20 years. The Company has other operating lease agreements with various terms and expiration dates. Total rent expense was $3 million, $3 million, and $5 million for 2017, 2016, and 2015, respectively. The Company includes any step rents, fixed escalations, lease concessions, and reasonably assured renewal periods in its computation of minimum lease payments.
Estimated minimum lease payments under operating leases at December 31, 2017 were as follows:
    
Affiliate Operating Leases(a)
 
Non-Affiliate Operating Lease(b)
 Total
    (in millions)
2018   $2
 $1
 $3
2019   2
 1
 3
2020   2
 1
 3
2021   2
 
 2
2022   2
 
 2
2023 and thereafter   7
 
 7
Total   $17
 $3
 $20
(a)Includes operating leases with affiliates primarily related to cellular towers.
(b)Primarily includes railcar and fuel handling equipment leases for Plant Daniel.
In addition to the above rental commitments, the Company entered into operating lease agreements for aluminum railcars for the transportation of coal at Plant Daniel, which is jointly owned with Gulf Power. The Company has the option to purchase the railcars at the greater of lease termination value or fair market value or to renew the leases at the end of the lease term. The Company also has separate lease agreements for other railcars that do not contain a purchase option.
The Company's 50% share of the lease costs, charged to fuel stock and recovered through the fuel cost recovery clause, was $1 million in 2017, $2 million in 2016, and $2 million in 2015.
In addition to railcar leases, the Company has other operating leases for fuel handling equipment at Plant Daniel. The Company's 50% share of the leases for fuel handling was charged to fuel handling expense annually from 2015 through 2017; however, those amounts were immaterial for the reporting period.

NOTES (continued)
Mississippi Power Company 2017 Annual Report

8. STOCK COMPENSATION
Stock-Based Compensation
Stock-based compensation primarily in the form of Southern Company performance share units and restricted stock units may be granted through the Omnibus Incentive Compensation Plan to a large segment of the Company's employees ranging from line management to executives. In 2015 and 2016, stock-based compensation consisted exclusively of performance share units. Beginning in 2017, stock-based compensation granted to employees includes restricted stock units in addition to performance share units. Prior to 2015, stock-based compensation also included stock options. As of December 31, 2017, there were 180 current and former employees participating in the stock option, performance share unit, and restricted stock unit programs.
Performance Share Units
Performance share units granted to employees vest at the end of a three-year performance period. All unvested performance share units vest immediately upon a change in control where Southern Company is not the surviving corporation. Shares of Southern Company common stock are delivered to employees at the end of the performance period with the number of shares issued ranging from 0% to 200% of the target number of performance share units granted, based on achievement of the performance goals established by the Compensation Committee of the Southern Company Board of Directors.
Southern Company issues performance share units with performance goals based on three performance goals to employees. These include performance share units with performance goals based on the total shareholder return (TSR) for Southern Company common stock during the three-year performance period as compared to a group of industry peers, performance share units with performance goals based on Southern Company's cumulative earnings per share (EPS) over the performance period, and performance share units with performance goals based on Southern Company's equity-weighted ROE over the performance period.
In 2015 and 2016, the EPS-based and ROE-based awards each represented 25% of the total target grant date fair value of the performance share unit awards granted. The remaining 50% of the total target grant date fair value consisted of TSR-based awards. Beginning in 2017, the total target grant date fair value of the stock compensation awards granted was comprised 20% each of EPS-based awards and ROE-based awards and 30% each of TSR-based awards and restricted stock units.
The fair value of TSR-based performance share unit awards is determined as of the grant date using a Monte Carlo simulation model to estimate the TSR of Southern Company's common stock among the industry peers over the performance period. The Company recognizes compensation expense on a straight-line basis over the three-year performance period without remeasurement.
The fair values of the EPS-based awards and the ROE-based awards are based on the closing stock price of Southern Company common stock on the date of the grant. Compensation expense for the EPS-based and ROE-based awards is generally recognized ratably over the three-year performance period initially assuming a 100% payout at the end of the performance period. Employees become immediately vested in the TSR-based performance share units, along with the EPS-based and ROE-based awards, upon retirement. As a result, compensation expense for employees that are retirement eligible at the grant date is recognized immediately while compensation expense for employees that become retirement eligible during the vesting period is recognized over the period from grant date to the date of retirement eligibility. The expected payout related to the EPS-based and ROE-based awards is reevaluated annually with expense recognized to date increased or decreased based on the number of shares currently expected to be issued. Unlike the TSR-based awards, the compensation expense ultimately recognized for the EPS-based awards and the ROE-based awards will be based on the actual number of shares issued at the end of the performance period.
For the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016, and 2015, employees of the Company were granted performance share units of 30,933, 62,435, and 53,909, respectively. The weighted average grant-date fair value of TSR-based performance share units granted during 2017, 2016, and 2015, determined using a Monte Carlo simulation model to estimate the TSR of Southern Company's stock among the industry peers over the performance period, was $49.24, $45.17, and $46.41, respectively. The weighted average grant-date fair value of both EPS-based and ROE-based performance share units granted during 2017, 2016, and 2015 was $49.22, $48.84, and $47.77, respectively.
For the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016, and 2015, total compensation cost for performance share units recognized in income was $2 million, $4 million, and $4 million, respectively, with the related tax benefit also recognized in income of $1 million, $1 million, and $2 million, respectively. The compensation cost related to the grant of Southern Company performance share units to the Company's employees is recognized in the Company's financial statements with a corresponding credit to equity, representing a capital contribution from Southern Company. As of December 31, 2017, total unrecognized compensation cost related to performance share award units was immaterial.

NOTES (continued)
Mississippi Power Company 2017 Annual Report

Restricted Stock Units
Beginning in 2017, stock-based compensation granted to employees included restricted stock units in addition to performance share units. One-third of the restricted stock units granted to employees vest each year throughout a three-year service period. All unvested restricted stock units vest immediately upon a change in control where Southern Company is not the surviving corporation. Shares of Southern Company common stock are delivered to employees at the end of the vesting period.
The fair value of restricted stock units is based on the closing stock price of Southern Company common stock on the date of the grant. Since one-third of the restricted stock units vest each year throughout a three-year service period, compensation expense for restricted stock unit awards is generally recognized over the corresponding one-, two-, or three-year period. Employees become immediately vested in the restricted stock units upon retirement. As a result, compensation expense for employees that are retirement eligible at the grant date is recognized immediately while compensation expense for employees that become retirement eligible during the vesting period is recognized over the period from grant date to the date of retirement eligibility.
For the year ended December 31, 2017, employees of the Company were granted 13,260 restricted stock units. The weighted average grant-date fair value of restricted stock units granted during 2017 was $49.22.
For the year ended December 31, 2017, total compensation cost for restricted stock units and the related tax benefit also recognized in income was immaterial. As of December 31, 2017, total unrecognized compensation cost related to restricted stock units was immaterial.
Stock Options
In 2015, Southern Company discontinued the granting of stock options. Stock options expire no later than 10 years after the grant date and the latest possible exercise will occur no later than November 2024.
The compensation cost related to the grant of Southern Company stock options to the Company's employees is recognized in the Company's financial statements with a corresponding credit to equity, representing a capital contribution from Southern Company. Compensation cost and related tax benefits recognized in the Company's financial statements were not material for any year presented. As of December 31, 2017, all compensation cost related to stock option awards has been recognized.
The total intrinsic value of options exercised during the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016, and 2015 was $2 million, $4 million, and $3 million, respectively. No cash proceeds are received by the Company upon the exercise of stock options. The actual tax benefit realized by the Company for the tax deductions from stock option exercises totaled $1 million, $2 million, and $1 million for the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016, and 2015, respectively. Prior to the adoption of ASU 2016-09 in 2016, the excess tax benefits related to the exercise of stock options were recognized in the Company's financial statements with a credit to equity. Upon the adoption of ASU 2016-09, beginning in 2016, all tax benefits related to the exercise of stock options are recognized in income. As of December 31, 2017, the aggregate intrinsic value for the options outstanding and exercisable was $4 million.
9. FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTS
Fair value measurements are based on inputs of observable and unobservable market data that a market participant would use in pricing the asset or liability. The use of observable inputs is maximized where available and the use of unobservable inputs is minimized for fair value measurement and reflects a three-tier fair value hierarchy that prioritizes inputs to valuation techniques used for fair value measurement.
Level 1 consists of observable market data in an active market for identical assets or liabilities.
Level 2 consists of observable market data, other than that included in Level 1, that is either directly or indirectly observable.
Level 3 consists of unobservable market data. The input may reflect the assumptions of the Company of what a market participant would use in pricing an asset or liability. If there is little available market data, then the Company's own assumptions are the best available information.
In the case of multiple inputs being used in a fair value measurement, the lowest level input that is significant to the fair value measurement represents the level in the fair value hierarchy in which the fair value measurement is reported.

NOTES (continued)
Mississippi Power Company 2017 Annual Report

As of December 31, 2017, assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis during the period, together with their associated level of the fair value hierarchy, were as follows:
 Fair Value Measurements Using  
 Quoted Prices in Active Markets for Identical Assets Significant Other Observable Inputs Significant Unobservable Inputs  
As of December 31, 2017:(Level 1) (Level 2) (Level 3) Total
 (in millions)
Assets:       
Energy-related derivatives$
 $2
 $
 $2
Interest rate derivatives
 1
 
 1
Cash equivalents224
 
 
 224
Total$224
 $3
 $
 $227
Liabilities:       
Energy-related derivatives$
 $9
 $
 $9
As of December 31, 2016, assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis during the period, together with their associated level of the fair value hierarchy, were as follows:
 Fair Value Measurements Using  
 Quoted Prices in Active Markets for Identical Assets Significant Other Observable Inputs Significant Unobservable Inputs  
As of December 31, 2016:(Level 1) (Level 2) (Level 3) Total
 (in millions)
Assets:       
Energy-related derivatives$
 $3
 $
 $3
Interest rate derivatives
 3
 
 3
Cash equivalents206
 
 
 206
Total$206
 $6
 $
 $212
Liabilities:       
Energy-related derivatives$
 $10
 $
 $10
Valuation Methodologies
The energy-related derivatives primarily consist of over-the-counter financial products for natural gas and physical power products, including, from time to time, basis swaps. These are standard products used within the energy industry and are valued using the market approach. The inputs used are mainly from observable market sources, such as forward natural gas prices, power prices, implied volatility, and overnight index swap interest rates. See Note 10 for additional information on how these derivatives are used.

NOTES (continued)
Mississippi Power Company 2017 Annual Report

As of December 31, 2017 and 2016, other financial instruments for which the carrying amount did not equal fair value were as follows:
 
Carrying
Amount
 
Fair
Value
 (in millions)
Long-term debt:   
2017$2,086
 $2,076
2016$2,979
 $2,922
The fair values are determined using Level 2 measurements and are based on quoted market prices for the same or similar issues or on the current rates offered to the Company.
10. DERIVATIVES
The Company is exposed to market risks, primarily commodity price risk and interest rate risk. To manage the volatility attributable to these exposures, the Company nets its exposures, where possible, to take advantage of natural offsets and enters into various derivative transactions for the remaining exposures pursuant to the Company's policies in areas such as counterparty exposure and risk management practices. The Company's policy is that derivatives are to be used primarily for hedging purposes and mandates strict adherence to all applicable risk management policies. Derivative positions are monitored using techniques including, but not limited to, market valuation, value at risk, stress testing, and sensitivity analysis. Derivative instruments are recognized at fair value in the balance sheets as either assets or liabilities and are presented on a net basis. See Note 9 for additional information. In the statements of cash flows, the cash impacts of settled energy-related and interest rate derivatives are recorded as operating activities.
Energy-Related Derivatives
The Company enters into energy-related derivatives to hedge exposures to electricity, gas, and other fuel price changes. However, due to cost-based rate regulations and other various cost recovery mechanisms, the Company has limited exposure to market volatility in energy-related commodity prices. The Company manages fuel-hedging programs, implemented per the guidelines of the Mississippi PSC, through the use of financial derivative contracts, which is expected to continue to mitigate price volatility.
Energy-related derivative contracts are accounted for under one of the following methods:
Regulatory Hedges – Energy-related derivative contracts which are designated as regulatory hedges relate primarily to the Company's fuel-hedging programs, where gains and losses are initially recorded as regulatory liabilities and assets, respectively, and then are included in fuel expense as the underlying fuel is used in operations and ultimately recovered through the respective fuel cost recovery clauses.
Not Designated – Gains and losses on energy-related derivative contracts that are not designated or fail to qualify as hedges are recognized in the statements of operations as incurred.
Some energy-related derivative contracts require physical delivery as opposed to financial settlement, and this type of derivative is both common and prevalent within the electric industry. When an energy-related derivative contract is settled physically, any cumulative unrealized gain or loss is reversed and the contract price is recognized in the respective line item representing the actual price of the underlying goods being delivered.
At December 31, 2017, the net volume of energy-related derivative contracts for natural gas positions totaled 53 million mmBtu for the Company, with the longest hedge date of 2021 over which the Company is hedging its exposure to the variability in future cash flows for forecasted transactions.
In addition to the volume discussed above, the Company enters into physical natural gas supply contracts that provide the option to sell back excess gas due to operational constraints. The maximum expected volume of natural gas subject to such a feature is 4 million mmBtu.
Interest Rate Derivatives
The Company may also enter into interest rate derivatives to hedge exposure to changes in interest rates. Derivatives related to existing variable rate securities or forecasted transactions are accounted for as cash flow hedges where the effective portion of the derivatives' fair value gains or losses is recorded in OCI and is reclassified into earnings at the same time the hedged transactions affect earnings. The derivatives employed as hedging instruments are structured to minimize ineffectiveness, which is recorded directly to income.

NOTES (continued)
Mississippi Power Company 2017 Annual Report

At December 31, 2017, the following interest rate derivatives were outstanding:
 Notional
Amount
 Interest
Rate
Received
 Weighted Average Interest
Rate Paid
 Hedge
Maturity
Date
 Fair Value
Gain (Loss)
December 31,
2017
 (in millions)       (in millions)
Cash Flow Hedges of Existing Debt$900
 1-month LIBOR 0.79% March 2018 $1
The estimated pre-tax losses that will be reclassified from accumulated OCI to interest expense for the next 12-month period ending December 31, 2018 are $0.5 million. The Company has deferred gains and losses that are expected to be amortized into earnings through 2022.
Derivative Financial Statement Presentation and Amounts
The Company enters into energy-related and interest rate derivative contracts that may contain certain provisions that permit intra-contract netting of derivative receivables and payables for routine billing and offsets related to events of default and settlements. Fair value amounts of derivative assets and liabilities on the balance sheets are presented net to the extent that there are netting arrangements or similar agreements with counterparties.
At December 31, 2017 and 2016, the fair value of energy-related derivatives and interest rate derivatives was reflected on the balance sheets as follows:
 20172016
Derivative Category and Balance Sheet LocationAssetsLiabilitiesAssetsLiabilities
 (in millions)
Derivatives designated as hedging instruments for regulatory purposes    
Energy-related derivatives:    
Other current assets/Other current liabilities$1
$6
$2
$6
Other deferred charges and assets/Other deferred credits and liabilities1
3
2
5
Total derivatives designated as hedging instruments for regulatory purposes$2
$9
$4
$11
Derivatives designated as hedging instruments in cash flow and fair value hedges    
Interest rate derivatives:    
Other current assets/Other current liabilities$1
$
$2
$
Other deferred charges and assets/Other deferred credits and liabilities

1

Total derivatives designated as hedging instruments in cash flow and fair value hedges$1
$
$3
$
Gross amounts recognized$3
$9
$7
$11
Gross amounts offset$(2)$(2)$(3)$(3)
Net amounts recognized in the Balance Sheets$1
$7
$4
$8
Energy-related derivatives not designated as hedging instruments were immaterial for 2017 and 2016.

NOTES (continued)
Mississippi Power Company 2017 Annual Report

At December 31, 2017 and 2016, the pre-tax effects of unrealized derivative gains (losses) arising from energy-related derivatives designated as regulatory hedging instruments and deferred were as follows:
 Unrealized Losses Unrealized Gains
Derivative Category
Balance Sheet
Location
2017 2016 
Balance Sheet
Location
2017 2016
  (in millions)  (in millions)
Energy-related derivatives:Other regulatory assets, current$(5) $(5) Other current liabilities$
 $1
 Other regulatory assets, deferred(2) (3) Other regulatory liabilities, deferred
 
Total energy-related derivative gains (losses) $(7) $(8)  $
 $1
For all years presented, the pre-tax effects of energy-related derivatives not designated as hedging instruments on the statements of operations were immaterial.
For the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016, and 2015, the pre-tax effects of derivatives designated as cash flow hedging instruments on the statements of operations were immaterial.
Contingent Features
The Company does not have any credit arrangements that would require material changes in payment schedules or terminations as a result of a credit rating downgrade. There are certain derivatives that could require collateral, but not accelerated payment, in the event of various credit rating changes of certain affiliated companies. At December 31, 2017, the Company had no collateral posted with its derivative counterparties.
At December 31, 2017, the fair value of derivative liabilities with contingent features was $1 million. However, because of joint and several liability features underlying these derivatives, the maximum potential collateral requirements arising from the credit-risk-related contingent features, at a rating below BBB- and/or Baa3, were $12 million, and include certain agreements that could require collateral in the event that one or more Southern Company system power pool participants has a credit rating change to below investment grade.
Generally, collateral may be provided by a Southern Company guaranty, letter of credit, or cash. If collateral is required, fair value amounts recognized for the right to reclaim cash collateral or the obligation to return cash collateral are not offset against fair value amounts recognized for derivatives executed with the same counterparty.
The Company is exposed to losses related to financial instruments in the event of counterparties' nonperformance. The Company only enters into agreements and material transactions with counterparties that have investment grade credit ratings by Moody's and S&P or with counterparties who have posted collateral to cover potential credit exposure. The Company has also established risk management policies and controls to determine and monitor the creditworthiness of counterparties in order to mitigate the Company's exposure to counterparty credit risk. Therefore, the Company does not anticipate a material adverse effect on the financial statements as a result of counterparty nonperformance.

NOTES (continued)
Mississippi Power Company 2017 Annual Report

11. QUARTERLY FINANCIAL INFORMATION (UNAUDITED)
Summarized quarterly financial information for 2017 and 2016 is as follows:
Quarter Ended
Operating
Revenues
 
Operating
Income (Loss)
 Net Income (Loss) After Dividends on Preferred Stock
 (in millions)
March 2017$272
 $(62) $(20)
June 2017303
 (2,954) (2,054)
September 2017341
 51
 40
December 2017271
 (177) (556)
      
March 2016$257
 $(10) $11
June 2016277
 (28) 2
September 2016352
 9
 26
December 2016277
 (166) (89)
As a result of the revisions to the cost estimate for the Kemper IGCC and its June 2017 suspension, the Company recorded total pre-tax charges to income related to the Kemper IGCC of $208 million ($185 million after tax) in the fourth quarter 2017, $34 million ($21 million after tax) in the third quarter 2017, $3.0 billion ($2.1 billion after tax) in the second quarter 2017, $108 million ($67 million after tax) in the first quarter 2017, $206 million ($127 million after tax) in the fourth quarter 2016, $88 million ($54 million after tax) in the third quarter 2016, $81 million ($50 million after tax) in the second quarter 2016, and $53 million ($33 million after tax) in the first quarter 2016. See Note 3 under "Kemper County Energy Facility" for additional information.
As a result of Tax Reform Legislation, the Company recorded total income tax expense of $372 million in the fourth quarter 2017. See Note 5 for additional information.
The Company's business is influenced by seasonal weather conditions.

SELECTED FINANCIAL AND OPERATING DATA 2013-2017
Mississippi Power Company 2017 Annual Report
 2017 2016 2015 2014 2013
Operating Revenues (in millions)$1,187
 $1,163
 $1,138
 $1,243
 $1,145
Net Income (Loss) After Dividends
on Preferred Stock (in millions)(a)
$(2,590) $(50) $(8) $(329) $(477)
Cash Dividends
on Common Stock (in millions)
$
 $
 $
 $
 $72
Return on Average Common Equity (percent)(a)
(120.43) (1.87) (0.34) (15.43) (24.28)
Total Assets (in millions)(b)(c)
$4,866
 $8,235
 $7,840
 $6,642
 $5,822
Gross Property Additions (in millions)$536
 $946
 $972
 $1,389
 $1,773
Capitalization (in millions):         
Common stock equity$1,358
 $2,943
 $2,359
 $2,084
 $2,177
Redeemable preferred stock33
 33
 33
 33
 33
Long-term debt(b)
1,097
 2,424
 1,886
 1,621
 2,157
Total (excluding amounts due within one year)$2,488
 $5,400
 $4,278
 $3,738
 $4,367
Capitalization Ratios (percent):         
Common stock equity54.6
 54.5
 55.1
 55.8
 49.9
Redeemable preferred stock1.3
 0.6
 0.8
 0.9
 0.7
Long-term debt(b)
44.1
 44.9
 44.1
 43.3
 49.4
Total (excluding amounts due within one year)100.0
 100.0
 100.0
 100.0
 100.0
Customers (year-end):         
Residential153,115
 153,172
 153,158
 152,453
 152,585
Commercial33,992
 33,783
 33,663
 33,496
 33,250
Industrial452
 451
 467
 482
 480
Other173
 175
 175
 175
 175
Total187,732
 187,581
 187,463
 186,606
 186,490
Employees (year-end)1,242
 1,484
 1,478
 1,478
 1,344
(a)A significant loss to income was recorded by the Company related to the suspension of the Kemper IGCC in June 2017. Earnings in all periods presented were impacted by losses related to the Kemper IGCC.
(b)A reclassification of debt issuance costs from Total Assets to Long-term debt of $9 million and $11 million is reflected for years 2014 and 2013, respectively, in accordance with new accounting standards adopted in 2015 and applied retrospectively.
(c)A reclassification of deferred tax assets from Total Assets of $105 million and $16 million is reflected for years 2014 and 2013, respectively, in accordance with new accounting standards adopted in 2015 and applied retrospectively.


SELECTED FINANCIAL AND OPERATING DATA 2013-2017 (continued)
Mississippi Power Company 2017 Annual Report
 2017
 2016
 2015
 2014
 2013
Operating Revenues (in millions):         
Residential$257
 $260
 $238
 $239
 $242
Commercial285
 279
 256
 257
 266
Industrial321
 313
 287
 291
 289
Other(9) 7
 (5) 8
 2
Total retail854
 859
 776
 795
 799
Wholesale — non-affiliates259
 261
 270
 323
 294
Wholesale — affiliates56
 26
 76
 107
 35
Total revenues from sales of electricity1,169
 1,146
 1,122
 1,225
 1,128
Other revenues18
 17
 16
 18
 17
Total$1,187
 $1,163
 $1,138
 $1,243
 $1,145
Kilowatt-Hour Sales (in millions):         
Residential1,944
 2,051
 2,025
 2,126
 2,088
Commercial2,764
 2,842
 2,806
 2,860
 2,865
Industrial4,841
 4,906
 4,958
 4,943
 4,739
Other39
 39
 40
 40
 40
Total retail9,588
 9,838
 9,829
 9,969
 9,732
Wholesale — non-affiliates3,672
 3,920
 3,852
 4,191
 3,929
Wholesale — affiliates2,024
 1,108
 2,807
 2,900
 931
Total15,284
 14,866
 16,488
 17,060
 14,592
Average Revenue Per Kilowatt-Hour (cents)(*):
         
Residential13.22
 12.68
 11.75
 11.26
 11.59
Commercial10.31
 9.82
 9.12
 8.99
 9.27
Industrial6.63
 6.38
 5.79
 5.89
 6.10
Total retail8.91
 8.73
 7.90
 7.97
 8.21
Wholesale5.53
 5.71
 5.20
 6.06
 6.76
Total sales7.65
 7.71
 6.80
 7.18
 7.73
Residential Average Annual
Kilowatt-Hour Use Per Customer
12,692
 13,383
 13,242
 13,934
 13,680
Residential Average Annual
Revenue Per Customer
$1,680
 $1,697
 $1,556
 $1,568
 $1,585
Plant Nameplate Capacity
Ratings (year-end) (megawatts)
3,628
 3,481
 3,561
 3,867
 3,088
Maximum Peak-Hour Demand (megawatts):         
Winter2,390
 2,195
 2,548
 2,618
 2,083
Summer2,322
 2,384
 2,403
 2,345
 2,352
Annual Load Factor (percent)63.1
 64.0
 60.6
 59.4
 64.7
Plant Availability Fossil-Steam (percent)89.1
 91.4
 90.6
 87.6
 89.3
Source of Energy Supply (percent):         
Coal7.5
 8.0
 16.5
 39.7
 32.7
Oil and gas88.0
 84.9
 81.6
 55.3
 57.1
Purchased power —         
From non-affiliates0.5
 (0.3) 0.4
 1.4
 2.0
From affiliates4.0
 7.4
 1.5
 3.6
 8.2
Total100.0
 100.0
 100.0
 100.0
 100.0
(*)The average revenue per kilowatt-hour (cents) is based on booked operating revenues and will not match billed revenue per kilowatt-hour.


SOUTHERN POWER COMPANY
FINANCIAL SECTION


MANAGEMENT'S REPORT ON INTERNAL CONTROL OVER FINANCIAL REPORTING
Southern Power Company and Subsidiary Companies 2017 Annual Report
The management of Southern Power Company (the Company) is responsible for establishing and maintaining an adequate system of internal control over financial reporting as required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and as defined in Exchange Act Rule 13a-15(f). A control system can provide only reasonable, not absolute, assurance that the objectives of the control system are met.
Under management's supervision, an evaluation of the design and effectiveness of the Company's internal control over financial reporting was conducted based on the framework in Internal Control—Integrated Framework (2013) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission. Based on this evaluation, management concluded that the Company's internal control over financial reporting was effective as of December 31, 2017.

/s/ Joseph A. Miller
Joseph A. Miller
Chairman, President, and Chief Executive Officer

/s/ William C. Grantham
William C. Grantham
Senior Vice President, Chief Financial Officer, and Treasurer
February 20, 2018


REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
To the stockholder and the Board of Directors of Southern Power Company and Subsidiary Companies
Opinion on the Financial Statements
We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Southern Power Company and Subsidiary Companies (the Company)subsidiary companies (Southern Power) (a wholly-owned subsidiary of The Southern Company) as of December 31, 20172018 and 2016,2017, the related consolidated statements of income, comprehensive income, stockholders' equity, and cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2017,2018, and the related notes (collectively referred to as the "financial statements"). In our opinion, the financial statements (pages II-508 to II-542) present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of the CompanySouthern Power as of December 31, 20172018 and 2016,2017, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2017,2018, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.
Basis for Opinion
These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company'sSouthern Power's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Company'sSouthern Power's financial statements based on our audits. We are a public accounting firm registered with the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (PCAOB) and are required to be independent with respect to the CompanySouthern Power in accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.
We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement, whether due to error or fraud. The CompanySouthern Power is not required to have, nor were we engaged to perform, an audit of its internal control over financial reporting. As part of our audits, we are required to obtain an understanding of internal control over financial reporting but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Company'sSouthern Power's internal control over financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion.
Our audits included performing procedures to assess the risks of material misstatement of the financial statements, whether due to error or fraud, and performing procedures that respond to those risks. Such procedures included examining, on a test basis, evidence regarding the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. Our audits also included evaluating the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the financial statements. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
/s/ Deloitte & Touche LLP
Atlanta, Georgia
February 20, 201819, 2019
We have served as the Company'sSouthern Power's auditor since 2002.
    Table of Contents                                Index to Financial Statements

DEFINITIONSCONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME
For the Years Ended December 31, 2018, 2017, and 2016
Southern Power Company and Subsidiary Companies 2018 Annual Report
TermMeaning
Alabama PowerAlabama Power Company
AOCIAccumulated other comprehensive income
ASCAccounting Standards Codification
ASUAccounting Standards Update
CO2
Carbon dioxide
CODCommercial operation date
CWIPConstruction work in progress
EPAU.S. Environmental Protection Agency
FASBFinancial Accounting Standards Board
FERCFederal Energy Regulatory Commission
GAAPU.S. generally accepted accounting principles
Georgia PowerGeorgia Power Company
Gulf PowerGulf Power Company
IRSInternal Revenue Service
ITCInvestment tax credit
KWHKilowatt-hour
LTSALong-term service agreement
Mississippi PowerMississippi Power Company
mmBtuMillion British thermal units
Moody'sMoody's Investors Service, Inc.
MWMegawatt
MWHMegawatt hour
NOX
Nitrogen oxide
OCIOther comprehensive income
power poolThe operating arrangement whereby the integrated generating resources of the traditional electric operating companies and Southern Power (excluding subsidiaries) are subject to joint commitment and dispatch in order to serve their combined load obligations
PPAPower purchase agreements, as well as contracts for differences that provide the owner of a renewable facility a certain fixed price for the electricity sold to the grid
PTCProduction tax credit
S&PS&P Global Ratings, a division of S&P Global Inc.
SCSSouthern Company Services, Inc. (the Southern Company system service company)
SECU.S. Securities and Exchange Commission
SO2
Sulfur dioxide
Southern CompanyThe Southern Company
Southern Company GasSouthern Company Gas and its subsidiaries
Southern Company systemSouthern Company, the traditional electric operating companies, Southern Power Company, Southern Company Gas (as of July 1, 2016), Southern Electric Generating Company, Southern Nuclear, SCS, Southern Linc, PowerSecure, Inc. (as of May 9, 2016), and other subsidiaries
Southern LincSouthern Communications Services, Inc.
Southern NuclearSouthern Nuclear Operating Company, Inc.
Tax Reform LegislationThe Tax Cuts and Jobs Act, which was signed into law on December 22, 2017 and became effective on January 1, 2018
traditional electric operating companiesAlabama Power, Georgia Power, Gulf Power, and Mississippi Power
 2018
 2017
 2016
 (in millions)
Operating Revenues:     
Wholesale revenues, non-affiliates$1,757
 $1,671
 $1,146
Wholesale revenues, affiliates435
 392
 419
Other revenues13
 12
 12
Total operating revenues2,205
 2,075
 1,577
Operating Expenses:     
Fuel699
 621
 456
Purchased power176
 149
 102
Other operations and maintenance395
 386
 354
Depreciation and amortization493
 503
 352
Taxes other than income taxes46
 48
 23
Asset impairment156
 
 
Gain on disposition(2) 
 
Total operating expenses1,963
 1,707
 1,287
Operating Income242
 368
 290
Other Income and (Expense):     
Interest expense, net of amounts capitalized(183) (191) (117)
Other income (expense), net23
 1
 6
Total other income and (expense)(160) (190) (111)
Earnings Before Income Taxes82
 178
 179
Income taxes (benefit)(164) (939) (195)
Net Income246
 1,117
 374
Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests59
 46
 36
Net Income Attributable to Southern Power$187
 $1,071
 $338
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
    Table of Contents                                Index to Financial Statements

MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSISCONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONSCOMPREHENSIVE INCOME
For the Years Ended December 31, 2018, 2017, and 2016
Southern Power Company and Subsidiary Companies 2018 Annual Report
 2018
 2017
 2016
 (in millions)
Net Income$246
 $1,117
 $374
Other comprehensive income (loss):     
Qualifying hedges:     
Changes in fair value, net of tax of $(17), $39, and $(17), respectively(51) 63
 (27)
Reclassification adjustment for amounts included in net income,
net of tax of $19, $(46), and $36, respectively
58
 (73) 58
Pension and other postretirement benefit plans:     
Benefit plan net gain (loss), net of tax of $2, $-, and $-, respectively5
 
 
Reclassification adjustment for amounts included in net income, net of
tax of $-, $-, and $-, respectively
2
 
 
Total other comprehensive income (loss)14
 (10) 31
Comprehensive income attributable to noncontrolling interests59
 46
 36
Comprehensive Income Attributable to Southern Power$201
 $1,061
 $369
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.


CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
For the Years Ended December 31, 2018, 2017 Annual Report, and
OVERVIEW
Business Activities2016
Southern Power Company and its subsidiaries (the Company) develop, construct, acquire, own, and manage power generation assets, including renewable energy projects, and sell electricity at market-based rates in the wholesale market. Subsidiary Companies 2018 Annual Report
 2018
 2017
 2016
 (in millions)
Operating Activities:     
Net income$246
 $1,117
 $374
Adjustments to reconcile net income
to net cash provided from operating activities —
     
Depreciation and amortization, total524
 536
 370
Deferred income taxes(239) (263) (1,063)
Amortization of investment tax credits(58) (57) (37)
Collateral deposits17
 (4) (102)
Accrued income taxes, non-current(14) 14
 (109)
Income taxes receivable, non-current42
 (61) (13)
Asset impairment156
 
 
Other, net(10) (9) 12
Changes in certain current assets and liabilities —     
-Receivables(20) (60) (54)
-Prepaid income taxes25
 24
 (29)
-Other current assets(26) (28) 4
-Accrued taxes7
 (55) 940
-Other current liabilities(19) 1
 46
Net cash provided from operating activities631
 1,155
 339
Investing Activities:     
Business acquisitions(65) (1,016) (2,284)
Property additions(315) (268) (2,114)
Change in construction payables(6) (153) (57)
Proceeds from disposition203
 
 
Payments pursuant to LTSAs and for equipment not yet received(75) (203) (350)
Other investing activities31
 15
 16
Net cash used for investing activities(227) (1,625) (4,789)
Financing Activities:     
Increase (decrease) in notes payable, net(105) (104) 73
Proceeds —     
Short-term borrowings200
 
 
Capital contributions2
 
 1,850
Senior notes
 525
 2,831
Other long-term debt
 43
 65
Redemptions —     
Senior notes(350) (500) (200)
Other long-term debt(420) (18) (86)
Short-term borrowings(100) 
 
Return of capital(1,650) 
 
Distributions to noncontrolling interests(153) (119) (57)
Capital contributions from noncontrolling interests2,551
 80
 682
Purchase of membership interests from noncontrolling interests
 (59) (129)
Payment of common stock dividends(312) (317) (272)
Other financing activities(26) (33) (30)
Net cash provided from (used for) financing activities
(363) (502) 4,727
Net Change in Cash, Cash Equivalents, and Restricted Cash41
 (972) 277
Cash, Cash Equivalents, and Restricted Cash at Beginning of Year140
 1,112
 835
Cash, Cash Equivalents, and Restricted Cash at End of Year$181
 $140
 $1,112
Supplemental Cash Flow Information:     
Cash paid (received) during the period for —     
Interest (net of $17, $11, and $44 capitalized, respectively)$173
 $189
 $89
Income taxes (net of refunds and investment tax credits)79
 (487) 116
Noncash transactions —     
Accrued property additions at year-end31
 32
 251
Accrued acquisitions at year-end
 
 461
The Company continually seeks opportunitiesaccompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
During 2017, the Company acquired or commenced construction of approximately 424 MWs of additional wind facilities and completed construction of, and placed in service, approximately 222 MWs of solar facilities. In addition, the Company continued development of its portfolio of wind projects and continued expansion of the 345-MW Mankato natural gas facility. Subsequent to
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
At December 31, 2018 and 2017 the
Southern Power Company acquired Gaskell West 1, which is an approximately 20-MW solar facility. See FUTURE EARNINGS POTENTIAL – "Acquisitions" and "Construction Projects" herein for additional information.Subsidiary Companies 2018 Annual Report
As of December 31, 2017, the Company's generation fleet totaled 12,940 MWs of nameplate capacity in commercial operation (including 5,152 MWs owned by its subsidiaries). The average remaining duration of the Company's total portfolio of wholesale contracts is approximately 15 years, which reduces remarketing risk for the Company. With the inclusion of the PPAs and investments associated with renewable and natural gas facilities currently under construction and acquired subsequent to December 31, 2017, the Company has an average investment coverage ratio of 91% through 2022 and 89% through 2027.
Assets2018
 2017
 (in millions)
Current Assets:   
Cash and cash equivalents$181
 $129
Receivables —   
Customer accounts receivable111
 117
Affiliated55
 50
Other116
 98
Materials and supplies220
 278
Prepaid income taxes25
 50
Other current assets37
 36
Total current assets745
 758
Property, Plant, and Equipment:   
In service13,271
 13,755
Less: Accumulated provision for depreciation2,171
 1,910
Plant in service, net of depreciation11,100
 11,845
Construction work in progress430
 511
Total property, plant, and equipment11,530
 12,356
Other Property and Investments:   
Intangible assets, net of amortization of $61 and $47
at December 31, 2018 and December 31, 2017, respectively
345
 411
Total other property and investments345
 411
Deferred Charges and Other Assets:   
Prepaid LTSAs98
 118
Accumulated deferred income taxes1,186
 925
Income taxes receivable, non-current30
 72
Assets held for sale576
 
Other deferred charges and assets373
 566
Total deferred charges and other assets2,263
 1,681
Total Assets$14,883
 $15,206
The Company is pursuing the saleaccompanying notes are an integral part of a 33% equity interest in a newly-formed holding company that owns substantially all of the Company's solar assets, which, if successful, is expected to close in the middle of 2018. The ultimate outcome of this matter cannot be determined at this time.
The Company's future earnings will depend on the parameters of the wholesale market and the efficient operation of its wholesale generating assets, as well as the Company's ability to execute its growth strategy and to develop and construct generating facilities. In addition, the Company's earnings may be impacted by the availability of federal and state solar ITCs and wind PTCs on its renewable energy projects, which could be impacted by current or future potential tax reform legislation. See FUTURE EARNINGS POTENTIAL – "Acquisitions," "Construction Projects," and "Income Tax Matters" herein for additional information.
Effective in December 2017, 538 employees transferred from SCS to the Company. The Company became obligated for related employee costs including pension, other postretirement benefits, and stock-based compensation and has recognized the respective balance sheet assets and liabilities, including AOCI impacts, in its balance sheet at December 31, 2017. Prior to the transfer of employees, the Company's agreements with SCS provided for employee services rendered at amounts in compliance with FERC regulations.
To evaluate operating results and to ensure the Company's ability to meet its contractual commitments to customers, the Company continues to focus on several key performance indicators, including, but not limited to, peak season equivalent forced outage rate, contract availability, and net income.
See RESULTS OF OPERATIONS herein for information on the Company'sthese consolidated financial performance.
Earnings
The Company's 2017 net income was $1.1 billion, a $733 million increase from 2016, primarily attributable to $743 million related to the Tax Reform Legislation. Also contributing to the change were increases in operating expenses and interest expense related to the Company's growth strategy and continuous construction program, largely offset by increased renewable energy sales.
The Company's 2016 net income was $338 million, a $123 million, or 57%, increase from 2015. The increase was primarily due to increased federal income tax benefits from solar ITCs and wind PTCs and increased renewable energy sales, partially offset by increases in depreciation, operations and maintenance expenses, and interest expense from debt issuances, primarily related to new solar and wind facilities.statements.
    Table of Contents                                Index to Financial Statements

MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS (continued)CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
At December 31, 2018 and 2017
Southern Power Company and Subsidiary Companies 20172018 Annual Report

Liabilities and Stockholders' Equity2018
 2017
 (in millions)
Current Liabilities:   
Securities due within one year$599
 $770
Notes payable100
 105
Accounts payable —   
Affiliated92
 102
Other77
 103
Accrued taxes6
 4
Liabilities held for sale, current15
 
Other current liabilities142
 148
Total current liabilities1,031
 1,232
Long-Term Debt:   
Senior notes —   
1.95% due 2019
 600
2.375% due 2020300
 300
2.50% due 2021300
 300
1.00% due 2022687
 720
2.75% due 2023290
 290
1.85% to 5.25% due 2025-20462,348
 2,374
Other long-term debt —   
Variable rate (3.34% at 12/31/18) due 2020525
 525
Unamortized debt premium (discount), net(9) (10)
Unamortized debt issuance expense(23) (28)
Total long-term debt4,418
 5,071
Deferred Credits and Other Liabilities:   
Accumulated deferred income taxes105
 199
Accumulated deferred ITCs1,832
 1,884
Other deferred credits and liabilities213
 322
Total deferred credits and other liabilities2,150
 2,405
Total Liabilities7,599
 8,708
Common Stockholder's Equity:   
Common stock, par value $0.01 per share —   
Authorized — 1,000,000 shares   
Outstanding — 1,000 shares
 
Paid-in capital1,600
 3,662
Retained earnings1,352
 1,478
Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss)16
 (2)
Total common stockholder's equity2,968
 5,138
Noncontrolling Interests4,316
 1,360
Total Stockholders' Equity7,284
 6,498
Total Liabilities and Stockholders' Equity$14,883
 $15,206
Commitments and Contingent Matters (See notes)

 
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

Benefits from solar ITCs,CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY
For the Years Ended December 31, 2018, 2017, and 2016
Southern Power Company and Subsidiary Companies 2018 Annual Report
 Number of Common Shares Issued Common Stock Paid-In Capital Retained Earnings
 Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income Total Common Stockholder's Equity 
Noncontrolling Interests(a)
 Total
 (in millions)
Balance at December 31, 2015
 $
 $1,822
 $657
 $4
 $2,483
 $781
 $3,264
Net income attributable
   to Southern Power

 
 
 338
 
 338
 
 338
Capital contributions from
   parent company

 
 1,850
 
 
 1,850
 
 1,850
Other comprehensive income
 
 
 
 31
 31
 
 31
Cash dividends on common
   stock

 
 
 (272) 
 (272) 
 (272)
Capital contributions from
   noncontrolling interests

 
 
 
 
 
 618
 618
Distributions to noncontrolling
   interests

 
 
 
 
 
 (57) (57)
Purchase of membership interests
   from noncontrolling interests

 
 
 
 
 
 (129) (129)
Net income attributable to
   noncontrolling interests

 
 
 
 
 
 32
 32
Other
 
 (1) 1
 
 
 
 
Balance at December 31, 2016
 
 3,671
 724
 35
 4,430
 1,245
 5,675
Net income attributable
   to Southern Power

 
 
 1,071
 
 1,071
 
 1,071
Capital contributions to parent
   company, net

 
 (2) 
 
 (2) 
 (2)
Other comprehensive income
 
 
 
 (10) (10) 
 (10)
Cash dividends on common
   stock

 
 
 (317) 
 (317) 
 (317)
Other comprehensive income
transfer from SCS
(b)

 
 
 
 (27) (27) 
 (27)
Capital contributions from
   noncontrolling interests

 
 
 
 
 
 79
 79
Distributions to noncontrolling
   interests

 
 
 
 
 
 (122) (122)
Net income attributable to
   noncontrolling interests

 
 
 
 
 
 44
 44
Reclassification from redeemable
   noncontrolling interests

 
 
 
 
 
 114
 114
Other
 
 (7) 
 
 (7) 
 (7)
Balance at December 31, 2017
 
 3,662
 1,478
 (2) 5,138
 1,360
 6,498
Net income attributable
   to Southern Power

 
 
 187
 
 187
 
 187
Return of capital to parent
 
 (1,650) 
 
 (1,650) 
 (1,650)
Capital contributions from parent
   company

 
 2
 
 
 2
 
 2
Other comprehensive income
 
 
 
 14
 14
 
 14
Cash dividends on common
   stock

 
 
 (312) 
 (312) 
 (312)
Capital contributions from
   noncontrolling interests

 
 
 
 
 
 1,372
 1,372
Distributions to noncontrolling
   interests

 
 
 
 
 
 (164) (164)
Net income attributable to
   noncontrolling interests

 
 
 
 
 
 59
 59
Sale of noncontrolling interests(c)

 
 (417) 
 
 (417) 1,690
 1,273
Other
 
 3
 (1) 4
 6
 (1) 5
Balance at December 31, 2018
 $
 $1,600
 $1,352
 $16
 $2,968
 $4,316
 $7,284
(a)Excludes redeemable noncontrolling interests. See Note 7 to the financial statements under "Noncontrolling Interests" for additional information.
(b)In connection with Southern Power becoming a participant to the Southern Company qualified pension plan and other postretirement benefit plan, $27 million of other comprehensive income, net of tax of $9 million, was transferred from SCS.
(c)See Note 15 under "Southern Power - Sales of Renewable Facility Interests" for additional information.
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.


REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
To the stockholder and the Board of Directors of Southern Company Gas and Subsidiary Companies
Opinion on the Financial Statements
We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets and consolidated statements of capitalization of Southern Company Gas and subsidiary companies (Southern Company Gas) (a wholly-owned subsidiary of The Southern Company) as of December 31, 2018 and 2017, the related toconsolidated statements of income, comprehensive income, stockholders' equity, and cash flows for the Company's acquisitionyears ended December 31, 2018 and construction of new facilities, and wind PTCs, related to wind generation, significantly impacted the Company's net income in 2017 and 2016. The Company's net income in 2015 was also significantly impacted by solar ITCs. See Note 5the six month periods ended June 30, 2016 (Predecessor) and December 31, 2016 (Successor), and the related notes (collectively referred to as the "financial statements"). In our opinion, the financial statements under "Effective Tax Rate"present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Southern Company Gas as of December 31, 2018 and 2017, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for additional information.the years ended December 31, 2018 and 2017 and the six months ended June 30, 2016 (Predecessor) and December 31, 2016 (Successor), in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.
Basis for Opinion
These financial statements are the responsibility of Southern Company Gas' management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on Southern Company Gas' financial statements based on our audits. We did not audit the financial statements of Southern Natural Gas Company, L.L.C. (SNG), Southern Company Gas' investment in which is accounted for by the use of the equity method. The accompanying consolidated financial statements of Southern Company Gas include its equity investment in SNG of $1,261 million and $1,262 million as of December 31, 2018 and December 31, 2017, respectively, and its earnings from its equity method investment in SNG of $131 million, $88 million, and $56 million for the years ended December 31, 2018 and 2017 and the six months ended December 31, 2016, respectively. Those statements were audited by other auditors whose reports (which express an unqualified opinion on SNG's financial statements and contain an emphasis of matter paragraph concerning the extent of its operations and relationships with affiliated entities) have been furnished to us, and our opinion, insofar as it relates to the amounts included for SNG, is based solely on the reports of the other auditors. We are a public accounting firm registered with the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (PCAOB) and are required to be independent with respect to Southern Company Gas in accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.
We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement, whether due to error or fraud. Southern Company Gas is not required to have, nor were we engaged to perform, an audit of its internal control over financial reporting. As part of our audits, we are required to obtain an understanding of internal control over financial reporting but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of Southern Company Gas' internal control over financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion.
Our audits included performing procedures to assess the risks of material misstatement of the financial statements, whether due to error or fraud, and performing procedures that respond to those risks. Such procedures included examining, on a test basis, evidence regarding the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. Our audits also included evaluating the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the financial statements. We believe that our audits and the reports of the other auditors provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
/s/ Deloitte & Touche LLP
Atlanta, Georgia
February 19, 2019
We have served as Southern Company Gas' auditor since 2016.
RESULTS
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONSINCOME
Southern Company Gas and Subsidiary Companies 2018 Annual Report
A condensed statement of income follows:
 Amount 
Increase (Decrease)
from Prior Year
 2017 2017 2016
 (in millions)
Operating revenues$2,075
 $498
 $187
Fuel621
 165
 15
Purchased power149
 47
 9
Other operations and maintenance386
 32
 94
Depreciation and amortization503
 151
 104
Taxes other than income taxes48
 25
 1
Total operating expenses1,707
 420
 223
Operating income368
 78
 (36)
Interest expense, net of amounts capitalized191
 74
 40
Other income (expense), net1
 (5) 5
Income taxes (benefit)(939) (744) (216)
Net income1,117
 743
 145
Less: Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests46
 10
 22
Net income attributable to the Company$1,071
 $733
 $123
  Successor  Predecessor
  For the year ended
December 31,
 For the year ended
December 31,
 July 1, 2016 through December 31,  January 1, 2016 through June 30,
  2018 2017 2016  2016
  (in millions)  (in millions)
Operating Revenues:         
Natural gas revenues (includes revenue taxes of
$114, $100, $32, and $57 for the periods presented,
respectively)
 $3,874
 $3,787
 $1,591
  $1,845
Alternative revenue programs (20) 4
 5
  (4)
Other revenues 55
 129
 56
  64
Total operating revenues 3,909
 3,920
 1,652
  1,905
Operating Expenses:         
Cost of natural gas 1,539
 1,601
 613
  755
Cost of other sales 12
 29
 10
  14
Other operations and maintenance 981
 945
 480
  452
Depreciation and amortization 500
 501
 238
  206
Taxes other than income taxes 211
 184
 71
  99
Goodwill impairment 42
 
 
  
Gain on dispositions, net (291) 
 
  
Merger-related expenses 
 
 41
  56
Total operating expenses 2,994
 3,260
 1,453
  1,582
Operating Income 915
 660
 199
  323
Other Income and (Expense):         
Earnings from equity method investments 148
 106
 60
  2
Interest expense, net of amounts capitalized (228) (200) (81)  (96)
Other income (expense), net 1
 44
 12
  3
Total other income and (expense) (79) (50) (9)  (91)
Earnings Before Income Taxes 836
 610
 190
  232
Income taxes 464
 367
 76
  87
Net Income 372
 243
 114
  145
Net income attributable to noncontrolling interest 
 
 
  14
Net Income Attributable to Southern Company Gas $372
 $243
 $114
  $131
Operating Revenues
Total operating revenues include PPA capacity revenues, whichThe accompanying notes are derived primarily from long-term contracts involving natural gas and biomass generating facilities, and PPA energy revenues from the Company's generation facilities. To the extent the Company has capacity not contracted under a PPA, it may sell power into the wholesale market and, to the extent the generation assets arean integral part of the Intercompany Interchange Contract (IIC), as approved by the FERC, it may sell power into the power pool.these consolidated financial statements.
Natural

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME
Southern Company Gas and Biomass Capacity and Energy RevenueSubsidiary Companies 2018 Annual Report
Capacity revenues generally represent the greatest contribution to net income and are designed to provide recovery of fixed costs plus a return on investment.
Energy is generally sold at variable cost or is indexed to published natural gas indices. Energy revenues will vary depending on the energy demand of the Company's customers and their generation capacity, as well as the market prices of wholesale energy compared to the cost of the Company's energy. Energy revenues also include fees for support services, fuel storage, and unit start charges. Increases and decreases in energy revenues under PPAs that are driven by fuel or purchased power prices are accompanied by an increase or decrease in fuel and purchased power costs and do not have a significant impact on net income.
Solar and Wind Energy Revenue
  Successor  Predecessor
  For the year ended
December 31,
 For the year ended
December 31,
 July 1, 2016 through December 31,  January 1, 2016 through June 30,
  2018 2017 2016  2016
  (in millions)  (in millions)
Net Income $372
 $243
 $114
  $145
Other comprehensive income (loss):         
Qualifying hedges:         
Changes in fair value, net of tax of
$2, $(3), $(1), and $(23), respectively
 5
 (5) (1)  (41)
Reclassification adjustment for amounts included
in net income, net of tax of $(1), $-, $-, and $-,
respectively
 (1) 1
 
  1
Pension and other postretirement benefit plans:         
Benefit plan net gain (loss), net of tax of
$-, $-, $19, and $-, respectively
 
 (1) 27
  
Reclassification adjustment for amounts included
in net income, net of tax of $3, $-, $-, and $4,
respectively
 (2) 
 
  5
Total other comprehensive income (loss) 2
 (5) 26
  (35)
Comprehensive income attributable to
noncontrolling interest
 
 
 
  14
Comprehensive Income Attributable to
Southern Company Gas
 $374
 $238
 $140
  $96
The Company's energy sales from solaraccompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.


CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
Southern Company Gas and wind generating facilitiesSubsidiary Companies 2018 Annual Report
  Successor  Predecessor
  For the year ended
December 31,
 For the year ended
December 31,
 July 1, 2016 through December 31,  January 1,
2016 through June 30,
  2018 2017 2016  2016
  (in millions)  (in millions)
Operating Activities:         
Net income $372
 $243
 $114
  $145
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash
provided from (used for) operating activities —
         
Depreciation and amortization, total 500
 501
 238
  206
Deferred income taxes (1) 236
 92
  8
Pension and postretirement funding 
 
 (125)  
Hedge settlements 
 
 (35)  (26)
Goodwill impairment 42
 
 
  
Gain on dispositions, net (291) 
 
  
Mark-to-market adjustments (19) (24) (3)  162
Other, net (24) (51) (51)  (57)
Changes in certain current assets and liabilities —         
-Receivables (218) (94) (490)  179
-Natural gas for sale, net of
   temporary LIFO liquidation
 49
 36
 (226)  273
-Prepaid income taxes (42) (39) (23)  151
-Other current assets 4
 (24) (31)  37
-Accounts payable 372
 (20) 194
  43
-Accrued taxes 10
 110
 8
  41
-Accrued compensation 32
 15
 (13)  (21)
-Other current liabilities (22) (8) 24
  (30)
Net cash provided from (used for) operating activities 764
 881
 (327)  1,111
Investing Activities:         
Property additions (1,388) (1,514) (614)  (509)
Cost of removal, net of salvage (96) (66) (40)  (32)
Change in construction payables, net (37) 72
 22
  (7)
Investment in unconsolidated subsidiaries (110) (145) (1,444)  (14)
Returned investment in unconsolidated subsidiaries 20
 80
 5
  3
Proceeds from dispositions 2,609
 
 
  
Other investing activities 
 5
 4
  3
Net cash provided from (used for) investing activities 998
 (1,568) (2,067)  (556)
Financing Activities:         
Increase (decrease) in notes payable, net (868) 262
 1,143
  (896)
Proceeds —         
First mortgage bonds 300
 400
 
  250
Capital contributions from parent company 24
 103
 1,085
  
Senior notes 
 450
 900
  350
Redemptions and repurchases —         
Gas facility revenue bonds (200) 
 
  
Medium-term notes 
 (22) 
  
First mortgage bonds 
 
 
  (125)
Senior notes (155) 
 (420)  
Return of capital (400) 
 
  
Distribution to noncontrolling interest 
 
 (15)  (19)
Purchase of 15% noncontrolling interest in SouthStar 
 
 (160)  
Payment of common stock dividends (468) (443) (126)  (128)
Other financing activities (3) (9) (8)  10
Net cash provided from (used for) financing activities (1,770) 741
 2,399
  (558)
Net Change in Cash, Cash Equivalents, and Restricted Cash (8) 54
 5
  (3)
Cash, Cash Equivalents, and Restricted Cash at Beginning of Year 78
 24
 19
  22
Cash, Cash Equivalents, and Restricted Cash at End of Year $70
 $78
 $24
  $19
Supplemental Cash Flow Information:         
Cash paid (received) during the period for —         
Interest (net of $7, $11, $4, and $3 capitalized, respectively) $249
 $223
 $135
  $119
Income taxes, net 524
 72
 23
  (100)
Noncash transactions — Accrued property additions at year-end 97
 135
 63
  41
The accompanying notes are predominantly through long-term PPAs that do not have a capacity charge. Customers either purchase the energy outputan integral part of a dedicated renewable facility throughthese consolidated financial statements.

CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
At December 31, 2018 and 2017
Southern Company Gas and Subsidiary Companies 2018 Annual Report

Assets 2018
 2017
  (in millions)
Current Assets:    
Cash and cash equivalents $64
 $73
Receivables —    
Energy marketing receivable 801
 607
Customer accounts receivable 370
 400
Unbilled revenues 213
 285
Affiliated 11
 12
Other accounts and notes receivable 142
 91
Accumulated provision for uncollectible accounts (30) (28)
Natural gas for sale 524
 595
Prepaid expenses 118
 79
Assets from risk management activities, net of collateral 219
 135
Other regulatory assets, current 73
 94
Other current assets 50
 52
Total current assets 2,555
 2,395
Property, Plant, and Equipment:    
In service 15,177
 15,833
Less: Accumulated depreciation 4,400
 4,596
Plant in service, net of depreciation 10,777
 11,237
Construction work in progress 580
 491
Total property, plant, and equipment 11,357
 11,728
Other Property and Investments:    
Goodwill 5,015
 5,967
Equity investments in unconsolidated subsidiaries 1,538
 1,477
Other intangible assets, net of amortization of $145 and $120
at December 31, 2018 and December 31, 2017, respectively
 101
 280
Miscellaneous property and investments 20
 21
Total other property and investments 6,674
 7,745
Deferred Charges and Other Assets:    
Other regulatory assets, deferred 669
 901
Other deferred charges and assets 193
 218
Total deferred charges and other assets 862
 1,119
Total Assets $21,448
 $22,987
The accompanying notes are an energy charge or pay a fixed price related to the energy sold to the grid. As a result, the Company's ability to recover fixed and variable operations and maintenance expenses is dependent upon the levelintegral part of energy generated from these facilities, which can be impacted by weather conditions, equipment performance, transmission constraints, and other factors.
See FUTURE EARNINGS POTENTIAL – "Power Sales Agreements" herein for additional information regarding the Company's PPAs.consolidated financial statements.
    Table of Contents                                Index to Financial Statements

MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS (continued)CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
At December 31, 2018 and 2017
Southern Power Company Gas and Subsidiary Companies 20172018 Annual Report

Details of the Company's operating revenues were as follows:
 2017 2016 2015
   (in millions)  
PPA capacity revenues$599
 $541
 $569
PPA energy revenues970
 694
 560
Total PPA revenues1,569
 1,235
 1,129
Non-PPA revenues494
 330
 252
Other revenues12
 12
 9
Total operating revenues$2,075
 $1,577
 $1,390
Liabilities and Stockholder's Equity 2018
 2017
  (in millions)
Current Liabilities:    
Securities due within one year $357
 $157
Notes payable 650
 1,518
Energy marketing trade payables 856
 546
Accounts payable —    
Affiliated 45
 21
Other 402
 425
Customer deposits 133
 128
Accrued taxes —    
Accrued income taxes 66
 40
Other accrued taxes 75
 78
Accrued interest 55
 51
Accrued compensation 100
 74
Liabilities from risk management activities, net of collateral 76
 69
Other regulatory liabilities, current 79
 135
Other current liabilities 130
 159
Total current liabilities 3,024
 3,401
Long-term Debt (See accompanying statements)
 5,583
 5,891
Deferred Credits and Other Liabilities:    
Accumulated deferred income taxes 1,016
 1,089
Deferred credits related to income taxes 940
 1,063
Employee benefit obligations 357
 415
Other cost of removal obligations 1,585
 1,646
Accrued environmental remediation 268
 342
Other deferred credits and liabilities 105
 118
Total deferred credits and other liabilities 4,271
 4,673
Total Liabilities 12,878
 13,965
Common Stockholder's Equity (See accompanying statements)
 8,570
 9,022
Total Liabilities and Stockholder's Equity $21,448
 $22,987
Commitments and Contingent Matters (See notes)
 
 
Operating revenues for 2017 were $2.1 billion, reflecting a $498 million, or 32%, increase from 2016. The increase in operating revenues was primarily due to the following:accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
PPA capacity revenuesincreased $58 million, or 11%, primarily due to additional customer capacity requirements, and a new PPA related to the Mankato natural gas facility acquired in late 2016.
PPA energy revenues increased $276 million, or 40%, primarily due to a $213 million increase in renewable energy sales arising from new solar and wind facilities and a $50 million increase in sales from existing natural gas PPAs primarily due to an $85 million increase in the average cost of fuel, partially offset by a $35 million decrease in the volume of KWHs sold primarily due to reduced customer load.
Non-PPA revenues increased $164 million, or 50%, primarily due to a $156 million increase in the volume of KWHs sold primarily from uncovered natural gas capacity through short-term opportunity sales, as well as an $8 million increase in the price of energy in the wholesale markets.
Operating revenues for 2016 were $1.6 billion, reflecting a $187 million, or 13%, increase from 2015. The increase in operating revenues was primarily due to the following:
PPA capacity revenuesdecreased $28 million as a result of a $44 million decrease in non-affiliate capacity revenues primarily as a result of PPA expirations and subsequent generation capacity remarketing into the short-term markets, partially offset by a $16 million increase in affiliate capacity revenues due to new PPAs.
PPA energy revenues increased $134 million primarily due to a $170 million increase in renewable energy sales arising from new solar and wind facilities, partially offset by a decrease of $36 million in fuel revenues related to natural gas PPAs. Overall, total KWH sales under PPAs increased 7% in 2016 when compared to 2015.
Non-PPA revenues increased $78 million primarily due to a 23% increase in KWH sales. Underlying this increase was a $113 million increase in short-term sales to non-affiliates as a result of remarketing generation capacity from expired PPAs, partially offset by a $35 million decrease in power pool sales primarily associated with a reduction in capacity available for sale.
Fuel and Purchased Power Expenses
Fuel costs constitute one of the largest expenses for the Company. In addition, the Company purchases a portion of its electricity needs from the wholesale market including the power pool. Details of the Company's generation and purchased power were as follows:
 Total
KWHs
Total KWH % ChangeTotal
KWHs
Total KWH % Change
 2017 2016 
 (in billions of KWHs)
Generation44 37 
Purchased power5 3 
Total generation and purchased power4923%4014%
Total generation and purchased power, excluding solar, wind, and tolling agreements2822%2310%
    Table of Contents                                Index to Financial Statements

MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS (continued)CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CAPITALIZATION
At December 31, 2018 and 2017
Southern Company Gas and Subsidiary Companies 2018 Annual Report

 2018
 2017
 2018
 2017
 (in millions) (percent of total)
Long-Term Debt:       
Long-term notes payable —       
3.50% due 2018$
 $155
    
5.25% due 2019300
 300
    
3.50% to 9.10% due 2021330
 330
    
8.55% to 8.70% due 202246
 46
    
2.45% due 2023350
 350
    
3.25% to 7.30% due 2025-20473,134
 3,134
    
Total long-term notes payable4,160
 4,315
    
Other long-term debt —       
First mortgage bonds —       
4.70% due 201950
 50
    
5.80% due 202350
 50
    
2.66% to 6.58% due 2026-20581,225
 925
    
Gas facility revenue bonds —       
Variable rate (1.71% at 12/31/17) due 2022
 47
    
Variable rate (1.71% at 12/31/17) due 2024-2033
 153
    
Total other long-term debt1,325
 1,225
    
Unamortized fair value adjustment of long-term debt474
 525
    
Unamortized debt discount(19) (17)    
Total long-term debt (annual interest requirement — $244 million)5,940
 6,048
    
Less amount due within one year357
 157
    
Long-term debt excluding amount due within one year5,583
 5,891
 39.4% 39.5%
Common Stockholder's Equity:       
Common stock — par value $0.01 per share       
Authorized — 100 million shares       
Outstanding — 100 shares       
Paid-in capital8,856
 9,214
    
Accumulated deficit(312) (212)    
Accumulated other comprehensive income26
 20
    
Total common stockholder's equity8,570
 9,022
 60.6
 60.5
Total Capitalization$14,153
 $14,913
 100.0% 100.0%
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY
Southern Company Gas and Subsidiary Companies 2018 Annual Report
 Southern Company Gas Common Stockholders' Equity   
 Number of Common Shares Common Stock   
Accumulated
Other
Comprehensive Income
(Loss)
 
Noncontrolling
Interests
 
 Issued Treasury Par Value Paid-In Capital Treasury Retained Earnings (Accumulated Deficit)  Total
 (in thousands) (in millions)
Predecessor –
Balance at December 31, 2015
120,377
 217
 $603
 $2,099
 $(8) $1,421
 $(186) $46
$3,975
Consolidated net income
   attributable to
   Southern Company Gas

 
 
 
 
 131
 
 
131
Other comprehensive income
   (loss)

 
 
 
 
 
 (35) 
(35)
Stock issued95
 
 
 6
 
 
 
 
6
Stock-based compensation270
 
 2
 28
 
 
 
 
30
Cash dividends on common stock
 
 
 
 
 (128) 
 
(128)
Reclassification of
   noncontrolling interest

 
 
 
 
 
 
 (46)(46)
Predecessor –
Balance at June 30, 2016
120,742
 217
 605
 2,133
 (8) 1,424
 (221) 
3,933
Successor –
Balance at July 1, 2016

 
 
 8,001
 
 
 
 
8,001
Consolidated net income
   attributable to
   Southern Company Gas

 
 
 
 
 114
 
 
114
Capital contributions from parent
company

 
 
 1,094
 
 
 
 
1,094
Other comprehensive income
   (loss)

 
 
 
 
 
 26
 
26
Cash dividends on common stock
 
 
 
 
 (126) 
 
(126)
Successor –
Balance at December 31, 2016

 
 
 9,095
 
 (12) 26
 
9,109
Consolidated net income
   attributable to
   Southern Company Gas

 
 
 
 
 243
 
 
243
Capital contributions from
   parent company, net

 
 
 117
 
 
 
 
117
Other comprehensive income
   (loss)

 
 
 
 
 
 (5) 
(5)
Cash dividends on common stock
 
 
 
 
 (443) 
 
(443)
Other
 
 
 2
 
 
 (1) 
1
Successor –
Balance at December 31, 2017

 
 
 9,214
 
 (212) 20
 
9,022
Consolidated net income
   attributable to
   Southern Company Gas

 
 
 
 
 372
 
 
372
Return of capital to parent
 
 
 (400) 
 
 
 
(400)
Capital contributions from
parent company

 
 
 42
 
 
 
 
42
Other comprehensive income
(loss)

 
 
 
 
 
 2
 
2
Cash dividends on common stock
 
 
 
 
 (468) 
 
(468)
Other
 
 
 
 
 (4) 4
 

Successor –
Balance at December 31, 2018

 
 $
 $8,856
 $
 $(312) $26
 $
$8,570
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements. 

COMBINED NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Southern Company and Subsidiary Companies 2018 Annual Report

Notes to the Financial Statements
for
The Southern Company and Subsidiary Companies
Alabama Power Company
Georgia Power Company
Mississippi Power Company
Southern Power Company and Subsidiary Companies 2017 Annual Report
Southern Company Gas and Subsidiary Companies

The Company's PPAs for natural gas and biomass generation generally provide that the purchasers are responsible for either procuring the fuel (tolling agreements) or reimbursing the Company for substantially all of the cost of fuel relating

Index to the energy delivered under such PPAs. Consequently, changes in such fuel costs are generally accompanied by a corresponding change in related fuel revenues and do not have a significant impact on net income. The Company is responsible for the cost of fuel for generating units that are not covered under PPAs. Power from these generating units is sold into the wholesale market or into the power pool for capacity owned directly by the Company.Combined Notes to Financial Statements
Purchased power expenses will vary depending on demand, availability, and the cost of generating resources throughout the Southern Company system and other contract resources. Load requirements are submitted to the power pool on an hourly basis and are fulfilled with the lowest cost alternative, whether that is generation owned by the Company, an affiliate company, or external parties. Such purchased power costs are generally recovered through PPA revenues.
Details of the Company's fuel and purchased power expenses were as follows:
In 2017, total fuel and purchased power expenses increased $212 million, or 38%, compared
Index to 2016. Fuel expenseincreased $165 million, or 36%, primarily dueApplicable Notes to an $83 million increase associated with the volume of KWHs generated and an $82 million increase associated with the average cost of natural gas per KWH generated. Purchased power expense increased $47 million, or 46%, primarily due to a $37 million increase associated with the volume of KWHs purchased and an $11 million increase associated with the average cost of purchased power.Financial Statements by Registrant
In 2016, total fuel and purchased power expenses increased $24 million, or 4%, compared to 2015. Fuel expenseincreased $15 million, or 3%, primarily due to a $22 million increase associated with the volume of KWHs generated, partially offset by a $7 million decrease associated with the average cost of natural gas per KWH generated. Purchased power expense increased $9 million, or 10%, primarily due to a $53 million increase associated with the volume of KWHs purchased, partially offset by a $28 million decrease associated with the average cost of purchased power and a $16 million decrease associated with a PPA expiration.
Other Operations and Maintenance Expenses
In 2017, other operations and maintenance expenses increased $32 million, or 9%, compared to 2016. The increase was primarily due to increases of $56 million associated with new facilities, $21 million in business development and support expenses, and $6 million in employee compensation, all associated with the Company's overall growth. These increases were partially offset by decreases of $35 million associated with scheduled outage and maintenance expenses and $15 million in non-outage operations and maintenance expenses.
In 2016, other operations and maintenance expenses increased $94 million, or 36%, compared to 2015. The increase was primarily due to increases of $35 million associated with new plants placed in service in 2015 and 2016, $25 million associated with scheduled outage and maintenance expenses, and $21 million in business development and support expenses and $13 million in employee compensation all primarily associated with the Company's overall growth.
Depreciation and Amortization
In 2017, depreciation and amortization increased $151 million, or 43%, compared to 2016. In 2016, depreciation and amortization increased $104 million, or 42%, compared to 2015. These increases were primarily due to additional depreciation related to new solar, wind, and natural gas facilities placed in service. See Note 1following notes to the financial statements under "Depreciation" for additional information.are a combined presentation. The list below indicates the registrants to which each note applies.
Taxes Other Than Income Taxes
RegistrantApplicable Notes
Southern Company1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17
Alabama Power1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 17
Georgia Power1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 17
Mississippi Power1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 17
Southern Power1, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 17
Southern Company Gas1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17
In 2017, taxes other than income taxes were $48 million compared to $23 million in 2016. In 2016, taxes other than income taxes increased $1 million, or 5%, compared to 2015. The increases were primarily due to additional property taxes due to new facilities.
    Table of Contents                                Index to Financial Statements

MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSISCOMBINED NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)
Southern Power Company and Subsidiary Companies 20172018 Annual Report

Interest Expense, Net1. SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES
General
Southern Company is the parent company of Amounts Capitalized
the traditional electric operating companies, Southern Power, Southern Company Gas (as of July 1, 2016), SCS, Southern Linc, Southern Holdings, Southern Nuclear, PowerSecure (as of May 9, 2016), and other direct and indirect subsidiaries. The traditional electric operating companies – Alabama Power, Georgia Power, Gulf Power (through December 31, 2018), and Mississippi Power – are vertically integrated utilities providing electric service in four Southeastern states. On January 1, 2019, Southern Company completed the sale of Gulf Power to NextEra Energy. Southern Power develops, constructs, acquires, owns, and manages power generation assets, including renewable energy projects, and sells electricity at market-based rates in the wholesale market. On May 22, 2018, Southern Power sold a noncontrolling 33% equity interest in SP Solar, a limited partnership indirectly owning substantially all of Southern Power's solar facilities, and, on December 11, 2018, Southern Power sold a noncontrolling tax equity interest in SP Wind, a holding company owning a portfolio of eight operating wind facilities. On November 5, 2018, Southern Power entered into an agreement to sell all of its equity interests in Plant Mankato (including the 385-MW expansion currently under construction). On December 4, 2018, Southern Power sold all of its equity interests in Plant Oleander and Plant Stanton Unit A (together, the Florida Plants) to NextEra Energy. Southern Company Gas distributes natural gas through natural gas distribution utilities and is involved in several other complementary businesses including gas pipeline investments, wholesale gas services, and gas marketing services. In 2017, interest expense, netJuly 2018, Southern Company Gas completed sales of amounts capitalized increased $74 million, or 63%three of its natural gas distribution utilities (Elizabethtown Gas (New Jersey), comparedFlorida City Gas, and Elkton Gas (Maryland)). The remaining natural gas distribution utilities include Nicor Gas (Illinois), Atlanta Gas Light (Georgia), Virginia Natural Gas, and Chattanooga Gas (Tennessee). In June 2018, Southern Company Gas also completed the sale of Pivotal Home Solutions, which provided home equipment protection products and services. SCS, the system service company, provides, at cost, specialized services to 2016. The increase wasSouthern Company and its subsidiary companies. Southern Linc provides digital wireless communications for use by Southern Company and its subsidiary companies and also markets these services to the public and provides fiber optics services within the Southeast. Southern Holdings is an intermediate holding company subsidiary, primarily duefor Southern Company's investments in leveraged leases and for other electric services. Southern Nuclear operates and provides services to an increase of $44 million in interest expense related to an increase in average outstanding long-term debt, primarily to fund the Company's growth strategySouthern Company system's nuclear power plants, including Alabama Power's Plant Farley and continuous construction program, as well as a $30 million decrease in capitalized interest associated with completingGeorgia Power's Plant Hatch and Plant Vogtle Units 1 and 2, and is currently managing construction of and placing in service solar facilities.
In 2016, interest expense, netdeveloping Plant Vogtle Units 3 and 4, which are co-owned by Georgia Power. PowerSecure is a provider of amounts capitalized increased $40 million, or 52%, comparedenergy solutions, including distributed energy infrastructure, energy efficiency products and services, and utility infrastructure services, to 2015. The increase was primarily due to an increase of $66 million in interest expense related to additional debt issued during 2016 primarily to fund the Company's growth strategy and continuous construction program, partially offset by a $26 million increase in capitalized interest associated with the construction of solar facilities.
Other Income (Expense), Net
In 2017, other income (expense), net decreased $5 million, or 83%, compared to 2016. In 2016, other income (expense), net increased $5 million compared to 2015. For 2017, the amount includes $159 million from currency losses compared to $82 million from currency gains in 2016, arising from translation of €1.1 billion euro-denominated fixed-rate notes into U.S. dollars, each fully offset by an equal amount on the foreign currency hedges that were reclassified from accumulated OCI into earnings.customers. See Note 9 to the financial statements under "Foreign Currency Derivatives"15 for additional information regarding hedging.disposition activities.
Income Taxes (Benefit)
In 2017,The registrants' financial statements reflect investments in subsidiaries on a consolidated basis. Intercompany transactions have been eliminated in consolidation. The equity method is used for investments in entities in which a registrant has significant influence but does not control and for VIEs where a registrant has an equity investment but is not the primary beneficiary. Southern Power has consolidated renewable generation projects that are partially funded by tax equity investors. The related contractual provisions represent profit-sharing arrangements because the allocations of cash distributions and tax benefits are not based on fixed ownership percentages. Therefore, the noncontrolling interest is accounted for under a balance sheet approach utilizing the HLBV method. The HLBV method calculates each partner's share of income tax benefit was $939 million compared to $195 million for 2016 of which $743 million is related to the Tax Reform Legislation under which the Company remeasured its accumulated deferred income taxes based on the new federal income tax rates. The remaining increasechange in tax benefit was primarily due to an increasenet equity the partner can legally claim in a HLBV at the end of $89 million in PTCs from wind generation in 2017 and other state income taxes, significantly offset by a decrease in tax benefits from lower ITCs from solar plants placed in service.
In 2016, income tax benefit was $195 millionthe period compared to an expensethe beginning of $21 millionthe period. See Note 7 for 2015. additional information.
The $216 million change was primarily duetraditional electric operating companies, Southern Power, certain subsidiaries of Southern Company Gas, and certain other subsidiaries are subject to an increaseregulation by the FERC, and the traditional electric operating companies and natural gas distribution utilities are also subject to regulation by their respective state PSCs or other applicable state regulatory agencies. As such, the respective financial statements of $180 millionthe registrants reflect the effects of rate regulation in federal income tax benefits related to ITCs for solar plants placed in serviceaccordance with GAAP and PTCs from wind generation in 2016comply with the accounting policies and a $35 million decrease in tax expense related to lower pre-tax earnings in 2016.practices prescribed by relevant state PSCs or other applicable state regulatory agencies.
See FUTURE EARNINGS POTENTIAL – "Income Tax MattersFederal Tax Reform Legislation" hereinThe preparation of financial statements in conformity with GAAP requires the use of estimates, and Note 1 tothe actual results may differ from those estimates. Certain prior years' data presented in the financial statements under "Income and Other Taxes" for information on how the Company recognizes the tax benefits relatedhave been reclassified to federal ITCs and PTCs and Note 5conform to the current year presentation. These reclassifications had no impact on the registrants' results of operations, financial statementsposition, or cash flows. In addition, Southern Company Gas has recast its reportable segments. See Note 16 under "Effective Tax Rate""Southern Company Gas" for additional information.
Effects of Inflation
TheAt December 31, 2018, Southern Company is partyand Southern Power each had assets and liabilities held for sale on their balance sheets. Unless otherwise noted, the disclosures herein related to long-term contracts reflecting market-based rates, including inflation expectations. Any adverse effect of inflation on the Company's results of operations has not been substantial in recent years.
FUTURE EARNINGS POTENTIAL
General
The results of operationsspecific asset and liability balances at December 31, 2018 exclude assets and liabilities held for the past three years are not necessarily indicative of the Company's future earnings potential. The level of the Company's future earnings depends on numerous factors that affect the opportunities, challenges, and risks of the Company's competitive wholesale business. These factors include: the Company's ability to achieve sales growth while containing costs; regulatory matters; creditworthiness of customers; total generating capacity available in the Company's market areas; the successful remarketing of capacity as current contracts expire; the Company's ability to execute its growth strategy, including successful additional investments in renewable and other energy projects, and to develop and construct generating facilities.
On December 22, 2017, the Tax Reform Legislation was signed into law and became effective on January 1, 2018, which among other things, reduces the federal corporate income tax rate to 21% and changes rates of depreciation and the business interest deduction.sale. See Note 15 under "Income Tax MattersAssets Held for Sale" and FINANCIAL CONDITION AND LIQUIDITY – "Credit Rating Risk" herein and Note 5 to the financial statements for additional information.
In September 2017, the Company began a legal entity reorganizationinformation including Southern Company's and Southern Power's major classes of various directassets and indirect subsidiaries that own and operate substantially all of the solar facilities, including certain subsidiaries owned in partnership with various third parties. The reorganization is expected to be substantially completed in the first quarter 2018. The Company is pursuing the sale of a 33% equity interest in the newly-formed holding company owning these solar assets, which, if successful, is expected to close in the middle of 2018. The ultimate outcome of this matter cannot be determined at this time.liabilities classified as held for sale.
    Table of Contents                                Index to Financial Statements

MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSISCOMBINED NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)
Southern Power Company and Subsidiary Companies 20172018 Annual Report

DemandSouthern Company Gas
Pursuant to the Merger, Southern Company pushed down the application of the acquisition method of accounting to the financial statements of Southern Company Gas such that the assets and liabilities are recorded at their respective fair values, and goodwill was established for electricity is primarily driventhe excess of the purchase price over the fair value of net identifiable assets. Accordingly, the financial statements of Southern Company Gas for periods before and after July 1, 2016 (acquisition date) reflect different bases of accounting, and the financial positions and results of operations of those periods are not comparable. Throughout Southern Company Gas' financial statements and the combined notes to the financial statements, periods prior to July 1, 2016 are identified as "predecessor," while periods after the acquisition date are identified as "successor."
Certain predecessor period data presented in Southern Company Gas' financial statements has been modified or reclassified to conform to the presentation used by the paceSouthern Company. Changes to Southern Company Gas' statements of economic growth that may be affected by changes in regionalincome include classifying operating revenues as natural gas revenues and global economic conditions,other revenues, as well as renewable portfolio standards, which may impact future earnings. Other factors that could influence future earnings include weather, transmission constraints,classifying cost of generation from unitsgoods sold as cost of natural gas and cost of other sales and presenting interest expense and AFUDC on a gross basis. Changes to Southern Company Gas' statements of cash flows include revised financial statement line item descriptions to align with the new balance sheet descriptions and expanded line items within the power pool, and operational limitations.each category of cash flow activity.
Recently Adopted Accounting Standards
Revenue
In 2014, the FASB issued ASC 606, Revenue from Contracts with Customers (ASC 606), replacing the existing accounting standard and industry-specific guidance for revenue recognition with a five-step model for recognizing and measuring revenue from contracts with customers. The underlying principle of the standard is to recognize revenue to depict the transfer of goods or services to customers at the amount expected to be collected. ASC 606 became effective on January 1, 2018 and the registrants adopted it using the modified retrospective method applied to open contracts and only to the version of contracts in effect as of January 1, 2018. In accordance with the modified retrospective method, the registrants' previously issued financial statements have not been restated to comply with ASC 606 and the registrants did not have a cumulative-effect adjustment to retained earnings. The adoption of ASC 606 had no significant impact on the timing of revenue recognition compared to previously reported results; however, it requires enhanced disclosures regarding the nature, amount, timing, and uncertainty of revenue and the related cash flows arising from contracts with customers, which are included herein and in Note 4.
ASC 606 provided additional clarity on financial statement presentation that resulted in reclassifications into other revenues and other operations and maintenance from other income/(expense), net at Alabama Power Sales Agreementsand Georgia Power primarily related to certain unregulated sales of products and services. In addition, contract assets related to certain fixed retail revenues at Georgia Power and Southern Company's unregulated distributed generation business have been reclassified from unbilled revenue in accordance with the guidance in ASC 606. These reclassifications did not affect the timing or amount of revenues recognized or cash flows. ASC 606 also provided additional guidance on revenue recognized over time, resulting in a change in the timing of revenue recognized from guaranteed and fixed billing arrangements at Southern Company Gas.
General

COMBINED NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)
Southern Company and Subsidiary Companies 2018 Annual Report

The Company has PPAsspecific impacts of applying ASC 606 to revenues from contracts with somecustomers on the financial statements of Southern Company'sCompany, Alabama Power, Georgia Power, and Southern Company Gas compared to previously recognized guidance is shown below.
 For the Year Ended December 31, 2018
Statements of IncomeAs Reported
Balances Without Adoption of
ASC 606
Effect of Change
 (in millions)
Southern Company   
Natural gas revenues$3,854
$3,852
$2
Other revenues1,239
1,234
5
Other operations and maintenance5,889
5,830
59
Operating Income4,191
4,243
(52)
Other income (expense), net114
60
54
Earnings Before Income Taxes2,749
2,747
2
Income taxes449
448
1
Consolidated Net Income2,300
2,299
1
Consolidated Net Income Attributable to Southern Company2,226
2,225
1
    
Alabama Power   
Other revenues$267
$230
$37
Other operations and maintenance1,669
1,625
44
Taxes other than income taxes389
388
1
Operating Income1,477
1,485
(8)
Other income (expense), net20
12
8
    
Georgia Power   
Other revenues$481
$387
$94
Other operations and maintenance1,860
1,772
88
Operating Income1,289
1,283
6
Other income (expense), net115
121
(6)
    
Southern Company Gas   
Natural gas revenues$3,874
$3,872
$2
Operating Income915
913
2
Earnings Before Income Taxes836
834
2
Income taxes464
463
1
Net Income372
371
1

COMBINED NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)
Southern Company and Subsidiary Companies 2018 Annual Report

 For the Year Ended December 31, 2018
Statements of Cash FlowsAs Reported
Balances Without Adoption of
ASC 606
Effect of Change
 (in millions)
Southern Company   
Consolidated net income$2,300
$2,299
$1
Changes in certain current assets and liabilities:   
Receivables(426)(472)46
Other current assets(127)(81)(46)
Accrued taxes267
268
(1)
Other current liabilities63
61
2
    
Georgia Power   
Changes in certain current assets and liabilities:   
Receivables$8
$1
$7
Other current assets(43)(36)(7)
    
Southern Company Gas   
Net income$372
$371
$1
Changes in certain current assets and liabilities:   
Accrued taxes10
11
(1)
Other current liabilities(22)(24)2
 At December 31, 2018
Balance SheetsAs Reported
Balances Without Adoption of
ASC 606
Effect of Change
 (in millions)
Southern Company   
Unbilled revenues$654
$728
$(74)
Other accounts and notes receivable813
814
(1)
Other current assets162
87
75
Accrued taxes656
655
1
Other current liabilities852
854
(2)
Total Stockholders' Equity29,039
29,038
1
    
Georgia Power   
Unbilled revenues$208
$243
$(35)
Other accounts and notes receivable80
81
(1)
Other current assets70
34
36
    
Southern Company Gas   
Accrued income taxes$66
$65
$1
Other current liabilities130
132
(2)
Common Stockholder's Equity8,570
8,569
1

COMBINED NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)
Southern Company and Subsidiary Companies 2018 Annual Report

Other
In 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-18, Statement of Cash Flows (Topic 230): Restricted Cash (ASU 2016-18). ASU 2016-18 eliminates the need to reflect transfers between cash and restricted cash in operating, investing, and financing activities in the statements of cash flows. In addition, the net change in cash and cash equivalents during the period includes amounts generally described as restricted cash or restricted cash equivalents. The registrants adopted ASU 2016-18 retrospectively effective January 1, 2018. Southern Company, Southern Power, and Southern Company Gas have restated prior periods in the statements of cash flows by immaterial amounts. The change in restricted cash in the statements of cash flows was previously disclosed in operating activities for Southern Company and Southern Company Gas and in investing activities for Southern Company and Southern Power. See "Restricted Cash" herein for additional information.
In January 2017, the FASB issued ASU No. 2017-04, Intangibles – Goodwill and Other (Topic 350): Simplifying the Test for Goodwill Impairment (ASU 2017-04). ASU 2017-04 removes the requirement to compare the implied fair value of goodwill with the carrying amount as part of Step 2 of the goodwill impairment test. Under the new standard, the goodwill impairment loss will be measured as the excess of a reporting unit's carrying amount over its fair value, not exceeding the total amount of goodwill allocated to that reporting unit, which may increase the frequency of goodwill impairment charges if a future goodwill impairment test does not pass the Step 1 evaluation. ASU 2017-04 is effective prospectively for periods beginning on or after December 15, 2019, with early adoption permitted. The registrants adopted ASU 2017-04 effective January 1, 2018 with no impact on their respective financial statements.
In March 2017, the FASB issued ASU No. 2017-07, Compensation – Retirement Benefits (Topic 715): Improving the Presentation of Net Periodic Pension Cost and Net Periodic Postretirement Benefit Cost (ASU 2017-07). ASU 2017-07 requires that an employer report the service cost component in the same line item or items as other compensation costs and requires the other components of net periodic pension and postretirement benefit costs to be separately presented in the statements of income outside of income from operations. Additionally, only the service cost component is eligible for capitalization, when applicable. The registrants adopted ASU 2017-07 effective January 1, 2018 with no material impact on their respective financial statements. ASU 2017-07 has been applied retrospectively, with the service cost component of net periodic benefit costs included in operations and maintenance expenses and all other components of net periodic benefit costs included in other income (expense), net in the statements of income for all periods presented for Southern Company, the traditional electric operating companies, and Southern Company Gas. The impacted registrants used the practical expedient provided by ASU 2017-07, which permits an employer to use the amounts disclosed in its retirement benefits note for prior comparative periods as the estimation basis for applying the retrospective presentation requirements to those periods. The amounts of the other investor-owned utilities, independent power producers, municipalities,components of net periodic benefit costs reclassified for the prior periods are presented in Note 11. The presentation changes resulted in a decrease in operating income and an increase in other income for the years ended December 31, 2017 and 2016 for each of the impacted registrants. Since Southern Power did not participate in the qualified pension and postretirement benefit plans until December 2017, no retrospective presentation of Southern Power's net periodic benefit costs is required. The requirement to limit capitalization to the service cost component of net periodic benefit costs has been applied on a prospective basis from the date of adoption for all registrants.
In August 2017, the FASB issued ASU No. 2017-12, Derivatives and Hedging (Topic 815): Targeted Improvements to Accounting for Hedging Activities (ASU 2017-12). ASU 2017-12 makes more financial and non-financial hedging strategies eligible for hedge accounting, amends the related presentation and disclosure requirements, and simplifies hedge effectiveness assessment requirements. ASU 2017-12 is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2018, with early adoption permitted. The registrants adopted ASU 2017-12 effective January 1, 2018 with no material impact on their respective financial statements. See Note 14 for disclosures required by ASU 2017-12.
On February 14, 2018, the FASB issued ASU No. 2018-02, Income Statement – Reporting Comprehensive Income (Topic 220): Reclassification of Certain Tax Effects from Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (ASU 2018-02) to address the application of ASC 740, Income Taxes (ASC 740) to certain provisions of the Tax Reform Legislation. ASU 2018-02 specifically addresses the ASC 740 requirement that the effect of a change in tax laws or rates on deferred tax assets and liabilities be included in income from continuing operations, even when the tax effects were initially recognized directly in OCI at the previous rate, which strands the income tax rate differential in accumulated OCI. The amendments in ASU 2018-02 allow a reclassification from accumulated OCI to retained earnings for stranded tax effects resulting from the Tax Reform Legislation. The registrants adopted ASU 2018-02 effective January 1, 2018 with no material impact on their respective financial statements.
On August 28, 2018, the FASB issued ASU No. 2018-14, Compensation – Retirement Benefits – Defined Benefit Plans – General (Topic 715-20): Disclosure Framework – Changes to the Disclosure Requirements for Defined Benefit Plans (ASU 2018-14). ASU 2018-14 amends ASC 715 to add, remove, and clarify disclosure requirements related to defined benefit pension and other load-serving entities,

COMBINED NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)
Southern Company and Subsidiary Companies 2018 Annual Report

postretirement plans. The registrants adopted ASU 2018-14 effective December 31, 2018 with no material impact on their respective financial statements. See Note 11 for disclosures required by ASU 2018-14.
Affiliate Transactions
The traditional electric operating companies, Southern Power, and Southern Company Gas have agreements with SCS under which certain of the following services are rendered to them at direct or allocated cost: general executive and advisory, general and design engineering, operations, purchasing, accounting, finance, treasury, legal, tax, information technology, marketing, auditing, insurance and pension administration, human resources, systems and procedures, digital wireless communications, cellular tower space, and other services with respect to business and operations, construction management, and power pool transactions. These costs are primarily included in other operations and maintenance expenses or capitalized to property, plant, and equipment. Costs for these services from SCS in 2018, 2017, and 2016 were as follows:
 Alabama
Power
Georgia
Power
Mississippi
Power
Southern
Power(a)
Southern Company Gas(b)
 (in millions)
2018$508
$653
$104
$98
$194
2017479
625
140
218
63
2016460
606
231
193
17
(a)Prior to December 2017, Southern Power had no employees but was billed for employee-related costs from SCS.
(b)Southern Company Gas' 2016 costs represent services provided subsequent to the Merger.
Alabama Power and Georgia Power also have agreements with Southern Nuclear under which Southern Nuclear renders the following nuclear-related services at cost: general executive and advisory services; general operations, management, and technical services; administrative services including procurement, accounting, employee relations, systems, and procedures services; strategic planning and budgeting services; other services with respect to business and operations; and, for Georgia Power, construction management. These costs are primarily included in other operations and maintenance expenses or capitalized to property, plant, and equipment. Costs for these services in 2018, 2017, and 2016 amounted to $247 million, $248 million, and $249 million, respectively, for Alabama Power and $780 million, $675 million, and $666 million, respectively, for Georgia Power. See Note 2 under "Georgia PowerNuclear Construction" for additional information regarding Southern Nuclear's construction management of Plant Vogtle Units 3 and 4 for Georgia Power.
Cost allocation methodologies used by SCS and Southern Nuclear prior to the repeal of the Public Utility Holding Company Act of 1935, as amended, were approved by the SEC. Subsequently, additional cost allocation methodologies have been reported to the FERC and management believes they are reasonable. The FERC permits services to be rendered at cost by system service companies.
Alabama Power's and Georgia Power's total power purchased from affiliates through the power pool is included in purchased power, affiliates on their respective statements of income. Mississippi Power's and Southern Power's total power purchased from affiliates through the power pool is included in purchased power on their respective statements of income and was as follows:
 
Mississippi
Power
Southern
Power
 (in millions)
2018$15
$41
201716
27
201629
21

COMBINED NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)
Southern Company and Subsidiary Companies 2018 Annual Report

SCS, as agent for Alabama Power, Georgia Power, Southern Power, and Southern Company Gas, has long-term interstate natural gas transportation agreements with SNG. The interstate transportation service provided to Alabama Power, Georgia Power, Southern Power, and Southern Company Gas by SNG pursuant to these agreements is governed by the terms and conditions of SNG's natural gas tariff and is subject to FERC regulation. See Notes 7 and 15 under "Southern Company GasEquity Method InvestmentsSNG" and "Southern Company GasInvestment in SNG," respectively, for additional information. Transportation costs under these agreements in 2018, 2017, and 2016 were as follows:
 Alabama
Power
Georgia
Power
Southern
Power
Southern Company Gas
 (in millions)
2018$8
$101
$25
$32
20179
102
25
32
2016(*)
2
35
7
15
(*)Represents costs incurred for the period subsequent to Southern Company Gas' investment in SNG.
On November 16, 2018, SNG completed its purchase of Georgia Power's natural gas lateral pipeline serving Plant McDonough Units 4 through 6 at net book value, as approved by the Georgia PSC on January 16, 2018. SNG expects to pay $142 million to Georgia Power in the first quarter 2020. During the interim period, Georgia Power will receive a discounted shipping rate to reflect the delayed consideration. Southern Company Gas' portion of the expected capital expenditures for the purchase of this pipeline and additional construction is $122 million.
SCS, as agent for the traditional electric operating companies and Southern Power, has agreements with certain subsidiaries of Southern Company Gas to purchase natural gas. Natural gas purchases made under these agreements were immaterial for Alabama Power and Mississippi Power and as follows for Georgia Power and Southern Power in 2018, 2017, and 2016:
 Georgia
Power
Southern
Power
 (in millions)
2018$21
$119
201722
119
2016(*)
10
17
(*)Represents costs incurred for the period subsequent to Southern Company's acquisition of Southern Company Gas.
Alabama Power and Mississippi Power jointly own Plant Greene County. The companies have an agreement under which Alabama Power operates Plant Greene County and Mississippi Power reimburses Alabama Power for its proportionate share of non-fuel expenses, which totaled $8 million, $9 million, and $13 million in 2018, 2017, and 2016, respectively. Mississippi Power also reimburses Alabama Power for any direct fuel purchases delivered from one of Alabama Power's transfer facilities. There were no such fuel purchases in 2018, 2017, and 2016. See Note 5 under "Joint Ownership Agreements" for additional information.
Alabama Power has an agreement with Gulf Power under which Alabama Power made transmission system upgrades to ensure firm delivery of energy under a non-affiliate PPA from a combined cycle plant located in Autauga County, Alabama. Under a related tariff, Alabama Power received $11 million in 2018, $11 million in 2017, and $12 million in 2016. See Note 15 under "Southern Company's Sale of Gulf Power" for information regarding the sale of Gulf Power.
Alabama Power has agreements with PowerSecure for services related to utility infrastructure construction, distributed energy, and energy efficiency projects. Costs for these services amounted to approximately $24 million in 2018 and $11 million in 2017 and were immaterial in 2016.
See Note 7 under "SEGCO" for information regarding Alabama Power's and Georgia Power's equity method investment in SEGCO and related affiliate purchased power costs, as well as Alabama Power's gas pipeline ownership agreement with SEGCO.
Georgia Power has entered into several PPAs with Southern Power for capacity and energy. Total expenses associated with these PPAs were $216 million, $235 million, and $265 million in 2018, 2017, and 2016, respectively. See Note 8 under "Long-term DebtCapital LeasesGeorgia Power" and Note 9 under "Fuel and Power Purchase AgreementsAffiliate" for additional information.

COMBINED NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)
Southern Company and Subsidiary Companies 2018 Annual Report

Georgia Power has a joint ownership agreement with Gulf Power under which Gulf Power owns a 25% portion of Plant Scherer Unit 3. Under this agreement, Georgia Power operates Plant Scherer Unit 3 and Gulf Power reimburses Georgia Power for its 25% proportionate share of the related non-fuel expenses, which were $8 million, $11 million, and $8 million in 2018, 2017, and 2016, respectively. See Note 5 under "Joint Ownership Agreements" and Note 15 under "Southern Company's Sale of Gulf Power" for additional information.
Mississippi Power has an agreement with Gulf Power under which Gulf Power owns a portion of Plant Daniel. Mississippi Power operates Plant Daniel and Gulf Power reimburses Mississippi Power for its proportionate share of all associated expenditures and costs, which totaled $31 million, $31 million, and $26 million in 2018, 2017, and 2016, respectively. See Note 5 under "Joint Ownership Agreements" and Note 15 under "Southern Company's Sale of Gulf Power" for additional information.
In 2014, prior to Southern Company's 2016 acquisition of PowerSecure, Georgia Power entered into agreements with PowerSecure to build solar power generation facilities at two U.S. Army bases, as approved by the Georgia PSC. In October 2016, the two facilities began commercial operation. Payments of $32 million made by Georgia Power to PowerSecure under the agreements since Southern Company's acquisition of PowerSecure are included in plant in service at December 31, 2018.
Southern Power's total revenues from all PPAs with Georgia Power, included in wholesale revenue affiliates on Southern Power's consolidated statements of income, were $215 million, $233 million, and industrial customers. $258 million for 2018, 2017, and 2016, respectively. Included within these revenues were affiliate PPAs accounted for as operating leases, which totaled $65 million, $81 million, and $109 million for 2018, 2017, and 2016, respectively.
Southern Power has several agreements with SCS for transmission services. Transmission services purchased by Southern Power from SCS totaled $12 million, $13 million, and $11 million for 2018, 2017, and 2016, respectively, and were charged to other operations and maintenance in Southern Power's consolidated statements of income. All charges were billed to Southern Power based on the Southern Company Open Access Transmission Tariff as filed with the FERC.
The PPAstraditional electric operating companies and Southern Power may jointly enter into various types of wholesale energy, natural gas, and certain other contracts, either directly or through SCS as agent. Each participating company may be jointly and severally liable for the obligations incurred under these agreements. See Note 9 under "Fuel and Power Purchase Agreements" for additional information. Southern Power and the traditional electric operating companies generally settle amounts related to the above transactions on a monthly basis in the month following the performance of such services or the purchase or sale of electricity. See "RevenuesSouthern Power" herein for additional information.
The traditional electric operating companies, Southern Power, and Southern Company Gas provide incidental services to and receive such services from other Southern Company subsidiaries which are generally minor in duration and amount. Except as described herein, the traditional electric operating companies, Southern Power, and Southern Company Gas neither provided nor received any material services to or from affiliates in 2018, 2017, or 2016.
Regulatory Assets and Liabilities
The traditional electric operating companies and natural gas distribution utilities are subject to accounting requirements for the effects of rate regulation. Regulatory assets represent probable future revenues associated with certain costs that are expected to providebe recovered from customers through the Companyratemaking process. Regulatory liabilities represent probable future reductions in revenues associated with a stable source of revenue during their respective terms.amounts that are expected to be credited to customers through the ratemaking process.
Many of the Company's PPAs have provisions that require the Company or the counterparty to post collateral or an acceptable substitute guarantee inIn the event that S&P or Moody's downgrades the credit ratings of the respective company to an unacceptable credit rating or if the counterparty is not rated or fails to maintain a minimum coverage ratio. See FINANCIAL CONDITION AND LIQUIDITY – "Credit Rating Risk" herein for additional information.
The Company is working to maintain and expand its share of the wholesale markets. The Company expects there to be new demand for capacity that will develop in the 2018-2020 timeframe. The size of available demand and timing will vary across the wholesale markets. The Company calculates an investment coverage ratio for its generating assets based on the ratio of investment under contract to total investment using the respective generation facilities' net book value (or expected in-service value for facilities under construction or being acquired) as the investment amount. With the inclusion of the PPAs and investments associated with the wind and natural gas facilities currently under construction and the Gaskell West 1 solar facility which was acquired subsequent to December 31, 2017, as well as other capacity and energy contracts, the Company has an average investment coverage ratio of 91% through 2022 and 89% through 2027, with an average remaining contract duration of approximately 15 years. See "Acquisitions" and "Construction Projects" herein for additional information.
Natural Gas and Biomass
The Company's electricity sales from natural gas and biomass generating units are primarily through long-term PPAs that consist of two types of agreements. The first type, referred to as a unit or block sale, is a customer purchase from a dedicated generating unit where all or a portion of a traditional electric operating company's or a natural gas distribution utility's operations is no longer subject to applicable accounting rules for rate regulation, such company would be required to write off to income or reclassify to AOCI related regulatory assets and liabilities that are not specifically recoverable through regulated rates. In addition, the generation from that unit is reservedtraditional electric operating company or natural gas distribution utility would be required to determine if any impairment to other assets, including plant, exists and write down the assets, if impaired, to their fair values. All regulatory assets and liabilities are to be reflected in rates. See Note 2 for that customer. The Company typically has the ability to serve the unit or block sale customer from an alternate resource. The second type, referred to as requirements service, provides that the Company serve the customer's capacityadditional information including details of regulatory assets and energy requirements from a combination of the customer's own generating units and from Company resources not dedicated to serve unit or block sales. The Company has rights to purchase power provided by the requirements customers' resources when economically viable.
As a general matter, substantially all of the PPAs provide that the purchasers are responsible for either procuring the fuel (tolling agreements) or reimbursing the Company for substantially all of the cost of fuel or purchased power relating to the energy delivered under such PPAs. To the extent a particular generating facility does not meet the operational requirements contemplatedliabilities reflected in the PPAs,balance sheets for Southern Company, the traditional electric operating companies, and Southern Company may be responsible for excess fuel costs. With respect to fuel transportation risk, most of the Company's PPAs provide that the counterparties are responsible for the availability of fuel transportation to the particular generating facility.
Capacity charges that form part of the PPA payments are designed to recover fixed and variable operation and maintenance costs based on dollars-per-kilowatt year. In general, to reduce the Company's exposure to certain operation and maintenance costs, the Company has LTSAs. See Note 1 to the financial statements under "Long-Term Service Agreements" for additional information.
Solar and Wind
The Company's electricity sales from solar and wind (renewables) generating facilities are also made pursuant to long-term PPAs; however, these solar and wind PPAs do not have a capacity charge and customers either purchase the energy output of a dedicated renewable facility through an energy charge or provide the Company a certain fixed price for the electricity sold to the grid. As a result, the Company's ability to recover fixed and variable operation and maintenance expenses is dependent upon the level of energy generated from these facilities, which can be impacted by weather conditions, equipment performance, transmission constraints, and other factors. Generally, under the solar and wind generation PPAs, the purchasing party retains the right to keep or resell the renewable energy credits.Gas.
    Table of Contents                                Index to Financial Statements

MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSISCOMBINED NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)
Southern Power Company and Subsidiary Companies 20172018 Annual Report

Environmental MattersRevenues
The Company's operations are regulated by state and federal environmental agencies throughregistrants generate revenues from a variety of laws and regulations governing air, water, land, and protection of other natural resources. The Company maintains a comprehensive environmental compliance strategy to assess upcoming requirements and compliance costs associated with these environmental laws and regulations. The costs, including capital expenditures and operations and maintenance costs, required to comply with environmental laws and regulations may impact results of operations, cash flows, and financial condition. Compliance costs may result from the installation of additional environmental controls. The ultimate impact of the environmental laws and regulations discussed below will depend on various factors, such as state adoption and implementation of requirements, the availability and cost of any deployed control technology, and the outcome of pending and/or future legal challenges.
New or revised environmental laws and regulations could affect many areas of the Company's operations. The Company's PPAs generally contain provisions that permit charging the counterparty with some of the new costs incurred as a result of changes in environmental laws and regulations.
Since the Company's units are newer natural gas and renewable generating facilities, costs associated with environmental compliance for these facilities have been less significant than for similarly situated coal or older natural gas generating facilities. Environmental, natural resource, and land use concerns, including the applicability of air quality limitations, the potential presence of wetlands or threatened and endangered species, the availability of water withdrawal rights, uncertainties regarding aesthetic impacts such as increased light or noise, and concerns about potential adverse health impacts can, however, increase the cost of siting and operating any type of future electric generating facility. The impact of such laws and regulations on the Company and subsequent recovery through PPA provisions cannot be determined at this time.
Environmental Laws and Regulations
Air Quality
In 2011, the EPA finalized the Cross-State Air Pollution Rule (CSAPR) and its NOX annual, NOX seasonal, and SO2 annual programs. CSAPR is an emissions trading program that addresses the impacts of the interstate transport of SO2 and NOX emissions from fossil fuel-fired power plants located in upwind states in the eastern half of the U.S. on air quality in downwind states. The Company has fossil fuel-fired generation subject to these requirements. In October 2016, the EPA published a final rule that revised the CSAPR seasonal NOX program, establishing more stringent NOX emissions budgets in Alabama and Texas. The EPA also removed North Carolina from the CSAPR NOX seasonal program and completely removed Florida from all CSAPR programs. Georgia's seasonal NOX budget remains unchanged. Increases in either future fossil fuel-fired generation or the cost of CSAPR allowances could have a negative financial impact on results of operations for the Company.
In 2015, the EPA published a final rule requiring certain states (including Alabama, Florida, Georgia, North Carolina, and Texas) to revise or remove the provisions of their state implementation plans (SIP) regulating excess emissions at industrial facilities, including electric generating facilities, during periods of startup, shut-down, or malfunction (SSM). The state excess emission rules provide necessary operational flexibility to affected units during periods of SSM and, if removed, could affect unit availability and result in increased operations and maintenance costs for the Company.
Water Quality
In 2014, the EPA finalized requirements under Section 316(b) of the Clean Water Act (CWA) to regulate cooling water intake structures at existing power plants and manufacturing facilities in order to minimize their effects on fish and other aquatic life. The regulation requires plant-specific studies to determine applicable measures to protect organisms that either get caught on the intake screens (impingement) or are drawn into the cooling system (entrainment). The ultimate impact of this rule will depend on the outcome of these plant-specific studies and any additional protective measures required to be incorporated into each plant's National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit based on site-specific factors.
In 2015, the EPA finalized the steam electric effluent limitations guidelines (ELG) rule that set national standards for wastewater discharges from steam electric generating units. The rule prohibits effluent discharges of certain wastestreams and imposes stringent arsenic, mercury, selenium, and nitrate/nitrite limits on scrubber wastewater discharges. The revised technology-based limits and compliance dates may require extensive modifications to existing wastewater management systems or the installation and operation of new wastewater management systems. Compliance with the ELG rule is expected to require capital expenditures and increased operational costs. Compliance applicability dates range from November 1, 2018 to December 31, 2023 with state environmental agencies' incorporating specific applicability dates in the NPDES permitting process based on information provided for each waste stream. The EPA has committed to a new rulemaking that could potentially revise the limitations and applicability dates of the ELG rule. The EPA expects to finalize this rulemaking in 2020.

MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS (continued)
Southern Power Company and Subsidiary Companies 2017 Annual Report

In 2015, the EPA and the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (Corps) jointly published a final rule that revised the regulatory definition of waters of the United States (WOTUS) for all CWA programs. The rule significantly expanded the scope of federal jurisdiction over waterbodies (such as rivers, streams, and canals), which could impact new generation projects. On July 27, 2017, the EPA and the Corps proposed to rescind the 2015 WOTUS rule. The WOTUS rule has been stayed by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit since late 2015, but on January 22, 2018, the U.S. Supreme Court determined that federal district courts have jurisdiction over the pending challenges to the rule. On February 6, 2018, the EPA and the Corps published a final rule delaying implementation of the 2015 WOTUS rule to 2020.
Global Climate Issues
In 2015, the EPA published final rules limiting CO2 emissions from new, modified, and reconstructed fossil fuel-fired electric generating units and guidelines for states to develop plans to meet EPA-mandated CO2 emission performance standards for existing units (known as the Clean Power Plan or CPP). In February 2016, the U.S. Supreme Court granted a stay of the CPP, which will remain in effect through the resolution of litigation in the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia challenging the legality of the CPP and any review by the U.S. Supreme Court. On March 28, 2017, the U.S. President signed an executive order directing agencies to review actions that potentially burden the development or use of domestically produced energy resources, including review of the CPP and other CO2 emissions rules. On October 10, 2017, the EPA published a proposed rule to repeal the CPP and, on December 28, 2017, published an advanced notice of proposed rulemaking regarding a CPP replacement rule.
In 2015, parties to the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change, including the United States, adopted the Paris Agreement, which established a non-binding universal framework for addressing greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions based on nationally determined contributions. On June 1, 2017, the U.S. President announced that the United States would withdraw from the Paris Agreement and begin renegotiating its terms. The ultimate impact of this agreement or any renegotiated agreement depends on its implementation by participating countries.
The EPA's GHG reporting rule requires annual reporting of GHG emissions expressed in terms of metric tons of CO2 equivalent emissions for a company's operational control of facilities. Based on ownership or financial control of facilities, the Company's 2016 GHG emissions were approximately 13 million metric tons of CO2 equivalent. The preliminary estimate of the Company's 2017 GHG emissions on the same basis is approximately 13 million metric tons of CO2 equivalent.
Income Tax Matters
Consolidated Income Taxes
On behalf of the Company, Southern Company files a consolidated federal income tax return and various state income tax returns, some ofsources which are combined, unitary, or consolidated. Under a joint consolidated income tax allocation agreement, each Southern Company subsidiary's currentaccounted for under various revenue accounting guidance, including ASC 606, lease, derivative, and deferred tax expense is computed on a stand-alone basisregulatory accounting. Other than the timing of recognition of guaranteed and no subsidiary is allocated more current expense than would be paid if it filed a separate income tax return. In accordance with IRS regulations, each company is jointly and severally liable for the federal tax liability.
The impact of certain tax eventsfixed billing arrangements at Southern Company and/Gas, the adoption of ASC 606 had no impact on the timing or its other subsidiaries can, and does, affect the Company's ability to utilize certain tax credits.amount of revenue recognized under previous guidance. See "Tax Credits" and ACCOUNTING POLICIES"Recently Adopted Accounting Standards"Application of Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates"Revenue" herein and Note 54 for information regarding the registrants' adoption of ASC 606 and related disclosures.
Traditional Electric Operating Companies
The majority of the revenues of the traditional electric operating companies are generated from contracts with retail electric customers. Retail revenues recognized under ASC 606 are consistent with prior revenue recognition policies. These revenues, generated from the integrated service to deliver electricity when and if called upon by the customer, are recognized as a single performance obligation satisfied over time, at a tariff rate, and as electricity is delivered to the financial statementscustomer during the month. Unbilled revenues related to retail sales are accrued at the end of each fiscal period. Retail rates may include provisions to adjust billings for additional information.
The Company currently has unutilized federal ITCfluctuations in fuel costs, fuel hedging, the energy component of purchased power costs, and PTC carryforwards totaling approximately $2.0 billion,certain other costs. Revenues are adjusted for differences between these actual costs and thus anticipates utilizing third-party tax equity partnerships as one of the financing sources to fund its renewable growth strategy where the tax partner will take significantly all of the respective federal tax benefits. These tax equity partnershipsamounts billed in current regulated rates. Under or over recovered regulatory clause revenues are expected to be consolidatedrecorded in the Company's financial statements using a hypothetical liquidation at book value (HLBV) methodologybalance sheets and are recovered from or returned to allocate partnership gains and lossescustomers, respectively, through adjustments to the Company.
Federal Tax Reform Legislation
On December 22, 2017, the Tax Reform Legislation was signed into law and became effective on January 1, 2018. The Tax Reform Legislation, among other things, reduces the federal corporate income tax rate to 21%, retains normalization provisions for public utility property and existing renewable energy incentives, and repeals the corporate alternative minimum tax.
For businesses other than regulated utilities, the Tax Reform Legislation allows 100% bonus depreciation of qualified property acquired and placed in service between September 28, 2017 and January 1, 2023 and phases down 20% each year until it completely phases out for qualified property placed in service after December 31, 2027. Further, the business interest deduction is

MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS (continued)
Southern Power Company and Subsidiary Companies 2017 Annual Report

limited to 30% of taxable income excluding interest, net operating loss (NOL) carryforward, and depreciation and amortization through December 31, 2021 and thereafter to 30% of taxable income excluding interest and NOL carryforwards.
In addition, under the Tax Reform Legislation, NOLs generated after December 31, 2017 can no longer be carried back to previous tax years but can be carried forward indefinitely, with utilization limited to 80% of taxable income of the subsequent tax year. The projected reduction of Southern Company's consolidated income tax liability resulting from the tax rate reduction also delays the expected utilization of existing tax credit carryforwards.
For the year ended December 31, 2017, implementation of the Tax Reform Legislation resulted in an estimated net tax benefit of $743 million, primarily due to the impact of the reduction of the corporate income tax rate on deferred tax assets and liabilities.
The Tax Reform Legislation is subject to further interpretation and guidance from the IRS, as well as each respective state's adoption. In addition, the regulatory treatment of certain impacts of the Tax Reform Legislation is subject to the discretion of the FERC.
See FINANCIAL CONDITION AND LIQUIDITY – "Credit Rating Risk" herein and Note 5 to the financial statements under "Current and Deferred Income Taxes" for additional information.
The ultimate outcome of these matters cannot be determined at this time.
Tax Credits
The Tax Reform Legislation retained the renewable energy incentives that were included in the Protecting Americans from Tax Hikes (PATH) Act. The PATH Act allows for 30% ITC for solar projects that commence construction by December 31, 2019; 26% ITC for solar projects that commence construction in 2020; 22% ITC for solar projects that commence construction in 2021; and a permanent 10% ITC for solar projects that commence construction on or after January 1, 2022. In addition, the PATH Act allows for 100% PTC for wind projects that commenced construction in 2016; 80% PTC for wind projects that commenced construction in 2017; 60% PTC for wind projects that commence construction in 2018; and 40% PTC for wind projects that commence construction in 2019. Wind projects commencing construction after 2019 will not be entitled to any PTCs. The Company has received ITCs related to its investment in new solar facilities acquired or constructed and receives PTCs related to the first 10 years of energy production from its wind facilities, which have had, and will continue to have, a material impact on the Company's cash flows and net income. At December 31, 2017, the Company had approximately $2.0 billion of unutilized ITCs and PTCs, which are currently expected to be fully utilized by 2027, but could be further delayed as a result of the Company's continued growth strategy, as well as the impacts from the Tax Reform Legislation.billing factors. See Note 1 to the financial statements under "Income and Other Taxes" and Note 5 to the financial statements under "Current and Deferred Income Taxes – Tax Credit Carryforwards" and "Effective Tax Rate"2 for additional information regarding utilization and amortizationregulatory matters of credits and the tax benefit related totraditional electric operating companies.
Wholesale capacity revenues from PPAs are recognized either on a levelized basis differences.
Bonus Depreciation
Underover the Tax Reform Legislation, projects with binding contracts prior to September 28, 2017 and placed in service after September 27, 2017 remain eligible for bonus depreciationappropriate contract period or the amount billable under the PATH Act.contract terms. Energy and other revenues are generally recognized as services are provided. The PATH Act allowedaccounting for 50% bonus depreciationthese revenues under ASC 606 is consistent with prior revenue recognition policies. The contracts for 2015 through 2017, 40% bonus depreciation for 2018,capacity and 30% bonus depreciation for 2019 and certain long-lived assets placedenergy in service in 2020. Baseda wholesale PPA have multiple performance obligations where the contract's total transaction price is allocated to each performance obligation based on provisional estimates, approximately $130 million of positive cash flowsthe standalone selling price. The standalone selling price is expectedprimarily determined by the price charged to result from bonus depreciationcustomers for the 2017 tax year. Should Southern Companyspecific goods or services transferred with the performance obligations. Generally, the traditional electric operating companies recognize revenue as the performance obligations are satisfied over time as electricity is delivered to the customer or as generation capacity is available to the customer.
For both retail and wholesale revenues, the traditional electric operating companies generally have a NOLright to consideration in 2018, allan amount that corresponds directly with the value to the customer of these cash flowsthe entity's performance completed to date and may not be fully realizedrecognize revenue in 2018.the amount to which the entity has a right to invoice and has elected to recognize revenue for its sales of electricity and capacity using the invoice practical expedient. In addition, any cash flows resultingpayment for goods and services rendered is typically due in the subsequent month following satisfaction of the registrants' performance obligation.
Southern Power
Southern Power sells capacity and energy at rates specified under contractual terms in long-term PPAs. These PPAs are accounted for as operating leases, non-derivatives, or normal sale derivatives. Capacity revenues from bonus depreciation will also be impactedPPAs classified as operating leases are recognized on a straight-line basis over the term of the agreement. Energy revenues are recognized in the period the energy is delivered.
Southern Power's non-lease contracts commonly include capacity and energy which are considered separate performance obligations. In these contracts, the total transaction price is allocated to each performance obligation based on the standalone selling price. The standalone selling price is primarily determined by the Company's useprice charged to customers for the specific goods or services transferred with the performance obligations. Generally, Southern Power recognizes revenue as the performance obligations are satisfied over time, as electricity is delivered to the customer or as generation capacity is made available to the customer. The timing of third-party tax equityrevenue recognition was not affected by the adoption of ASC 606.
Southern Power generally has a right to consideration in an amount that corresponds directly with the value to the customer of the entity's performance completed to date and may recognize revenue in the amount to which the entity has a right to invoice. In addition, payment for goods and services rendered is typically due in the subsequent month following satisfaction of Southern Power's performance obligation.
When multiple contracts exist with the same counterparty, the revenues from each contract are accounted for as separate arrangements.
Southern Power may also enter into contracts to sell short-term capacity in the wholesale electricity markets. These sales are generally classified as mark-to-market derivatives and net unrealized gains and losses on such contracts are recorded in wholesale revenues. See Note 5 to the financial statements under "Current14 and Deferred Income Taxes""Financial Instruments" herein for additional information. The ultimate outcome of these matters cannot be determined at this time.
Legal Entity Reorganization
In September 2017, the Company began a legal entity reorganization of various direct and indirect subsidiaries that own and operate substantially all of the solar facilities, including certain subsidiaries owned in partnership with various third parties. The reorganization included the purchase of all of the redeemable noncontrolling interests, representing 10% of the membership interests, in Southern Turner Renewable Energy, LLC. The reorganization is expected to be substantially completed in the first quarter 2018 and is expected to result in estimated tax benefits totaling between $50 million and $55 million related to certain changes in state apportionment rates and net operating loss carryforward utilization that will be recorded in the first quarter 2018. The Company is pursuing the sale of a 33% equity interest in the newly-formed holding company owning these solar assets. The ultimate outcome of this matter cannot be determined at this time.
    Table of Contents                                Index to Financial Statements

MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSISCOMBINED NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)
Southern Power Company and Subsidiary Companies 20172018 Annual Report

AcquisitionsSouthern Company Gas
During 2017Gas Distribution Operations
Southern Company Gas records revenues when goods or services are provided to customers. Those revenues are based on rates approved by the state regulatory agencies of the natural gas distribution utilities. The natural gas market for Atlanta Gas Light was deregulated in 1997. Accordingly, Marketers, rather than a traditional utility, sell natural gas to end-use customers in Georgia and subsequent to December 31, 2017,handle customer billing functions. As required by the Georgia PSC, Atlanta Gas Light bills Marketers in accordance with its overall growth strategy, the Company acquired the projects discussed below,equal monthly installments for each residential, commercial, and industrial end-use customer's distribution costs as well as for capacity costs utilizing a seasonal rate design for the Cactus Flats wind facility discussed under "Construction Projects" herein. See Note 11calculation of each residential end-use customer's annual straight-fixed-variable charge, which reflects the historic volumetric usage pattern for the entire residential class.
The majority of the revenues of Southern Company Gas are generated from contracts with natural gas distribution customers. Revenues from this integrated service to deliver gas when and if called upon by the customer is recognized as a single performance obligation satisfied over time and is recognized at a tariff rate as gas is delivered to the financial statementscustomer during the month.
The standalone selling price is primarily determined by the price charged to customers for additional information.the specific goods or services transferred with the performance obligations. Generally, Southern Company Gas recognizes revenue as the performance obligations are satisfied over time as natural gas is delivered to the customer. The performance obligations related to wholesale gas services are satisfied, and revenue is recognized, at a point in time when natural gas is delivered to the customer.
Project FacilityResourceSeller, Acquisition Date
Approximate Nameplate Capacity (MW)
LocationPercentage OwnershipActual/Expected CODPPA CounterpartiesPPA Contract Period
Business Acquisitions During the Year Ended December 31, 2017
BethelWindInvenergy Wind Global LLC, January 6, 2017276Castro County, TX100% January 2017Google Energy, LLC12 years
Asset Acquisitions Subsequent to December 31, 2017
Gaskell West 1Solar
Recurrent Energy Development Holdings, LLC, 
January 26, 2018
20Kern County, CA100% of Class B(*)March 2018Southern California Edison20 years
(*)The Company owns 100% of the class B membership interest under a tax equity partnership agreement.
Construction Projects
Construction Projects Completed andSouthern Company Gas generally has a right to consideration in Progress
During 2017, in accordancean amount that corresponds directly with its overall growth strategy, the Company completed construction of and placed in service, or continued constructionvalue to the customer of the projects set forthentity's performance completed to date and may recognize revenue in the table below.amount to which the entity has a right to invoice and has elected to recognize revenue for its sales of natural gas using the invoice practical expedient. In addition, payment for goods and services rendered is typically due in the subsequent month following satisfaction of Southern Company Gas' performance obligation.
Project FacilityResource
Approximate Nameplate Capacity (MW)
 LocationOwnership PercentageActual / Expected CODPPA CounterpartiesPPA Contract Period
Construction Projects Completed During the Year Ended December 31, 2017
East PecosSolar120 Pecos County, TX100% March 2017Austin Energy15 years
LamesaSolar102 Dawson County, TX100% April 2017City of Garland, Texas15 years
Projects Under Construction at December 31, 2017
Cactus FlatsWind148 Concho County, TX100%(*)Third quarter 2018General Motors and General Mills12 years and 15 years
Mankato ExpansionNatural Gas345 Mankato, MN100%
 Second quarter 2019Northern States Power Company20 years
(*) On July 31, 2017,With the Company purchased 100%exception of Atlanta Gas Light, the natural gas distribution utilities have rate structures that include volumetric rate designs that allow the opportunity to recover certain costs based on gas usage. Revenues from sales and transportation services are recognized in the same period in which the related volumes are delivered to customers. Revenues from residential and certain commercial and industrial customers are recognized on the basis of scheduled meter readings. Additionally, unbilled revenues are recognized for estimated deliveries of gas not yet billed to these customers, from the last bill date to the end of the Cactus Flats facilityaccounting period. For other commercial and commenced construction. Upon placingindustrial customers and for all wholesale customers, revenues are based on actual deliveries through the facilityend of the period.
The tariffs for several of the natural gas distribution utilities include provisions which allow for the recognition of certain revenues prior to the time such revenues are billed to customers. These provisions are referred to as alternative revenue programs and provide for the recognition of certain revenues prior to billing, as long as the amounts recognized will be collected from customers within 24 months of recognition. These programs are as follows:
Weather normalization adjustments – reduce customer bills when winter weather is colder than normal and increase customer bills when weather is warmer than normal and are included in service, the tariffs for Virginia Natural Gas, Chattanooga Gas, and, prior to its sale, Elizabethtown Gas;
Revenue normalization mechanisms – mitigate the impact of conservation and declining customer usage and are contained in the tariffs for Virginia Natural Gas, Chattanooga Gas, and, prior to its sale, Elkton Gas; and
Revenue true-up adjustment – included within the provisions of the Georgia Rate Adjustment Mechanism (GRAM) program in which Atlanta Gas Light participates as a short-term alternative to formal rate case filings, the revenue true-up feature provides for a monthly positive (or negative) adjustment to record revenue in the amount of any variance to budgeted revenues, which are submitted and approved annually as a requirement of GRAM. Such adjustments are reflected in customer billings in a subsequent program year.
Wholesale Gas Services
Southern Company expectsGas nets revenues from energy and risk management activities with the associated costs. Profits from sales between segments are eliminated and are recognized as goods or services sold to closeend-use customers. Southern Company Gas records transactions that qualify as derivatives at fair value with changes in fair value recognized in earnings in the period of change and characterized as unrealized gains or losses. Gains and losses on derivatives held for energy trading purposes are presented on a tax equity partnership agreement that has already been executed, subject to various customary conditions at closing, and will then own 100% of the class B membership interests.
Total aggregate construction costs for projects under construction at December 31, 2017, excluding acquisition costs and including construction costs to complete the subsequently-acquired Gaskell West 1 solar project, are expected to be between $385 million and $430 million. At December 31, 2017, total costs of construction incurred for these projects was $188 million, all of which remainednet basis in CWIP.
Development Projects
During 2017, as part of the Company's renewable development strategy, the Company purchased wind turbine equipment from Siemens Wind Power, Inc. and Vestas-American Wind Technology, Inc. to be used for various development and construction projects, up to 900 MWs in total. Once these wind projects reach commercial operations, which is expected in 2021, they are expected to qualify for 80% PTCs.revenue.
    Table of Contents                                Index to Financial Statements

MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSISCOMBINED NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)
Southern Power Company and Subsidiary Companies 20172018 Annual Report

During 2016,Gas Marketing Services
Southern Company Gas recognizes revenues from natural gas sales and transportation services in the same period in which the related volumes are delivered to customers and recognizes sales revenues from residential and certain commercial and industrial customers on the basis of scheduled meter readings. Southern Company entered intoGas also recognizes unbilled revenues for estimated deliveries of gas not yet billed to these customers from the most recent meter reading date to the end of the accounting period. For other commercial and industrial customers and for all wholesale customers, revenues are based on actual deliveries during the period.
Southern Company Gas recognizes revenues on 12-month utility-bill management contracts as the lesser of cumulative earned or cumulative billed amounts. Prior to the sale of Pivotal Home Solutions, revenues for warranty and repair contracts were recognized on a joint development agreementstraight-line basis over the contract term while revenues for maintenance services were recognized at the time such services were performed. See Note 15 under "Southern Company GasSale of Pivotal Home Solutions" for additional information.
Concentration of Revenue
Southern Company, Alabama Power, Georgia Power, Mississippi Power (with the exception of its cost-based MRA electric tariffs described below), and Southern Company Gas each have a diversified base of customers and no single customer or industry comprises 10% or more of each company's revenues.
Mississippi Power serves long-term contracts with Renewable Energy Systems Americas, Inc.rural electric cooperative associations and municipalities located in southeastern Mississippi under cost-based MRA electric tariffs, which are subject to developregulation by the FERC. The contracts with these wholesale customers represented 17.3% of Mississippi Power's total operating revenues in 2018 and constructare generally subject to 10-year rolling cancellation notices. Historically, these wholesale customers have acted as a group and any changes in contractual relationships for one customer are likely to be followed by the other wholesale customers.
Significant portions of Southern Power's revenues have been derived from certain customers pursuant to PPAs. The following table shows the percentage of total revenues for Southern Power's top three customers for each of the years presented:
 201820172016
Georgia Power9.8%11.3%16.5%
Duke Energy Corporation6.8%6.7%7.8%
Southern California Edison6.2%N/A
N/A
Morgan Stanley Capital GroupN/A
4.5%N/A
San Diego Gas & Electric CompanyN/A
N/A
5.7%
On January 29, 2019, Pacific Gas & Electric Company (PG&E) filed petitions to reorganize under Chapter 11 of the U.S. Bankruptcy Code. Southern Power, together with its noncontrolling partners, owns four solar facilities where PG&E is the energy off-taker for approximately 3,000207 MWs of wind projects expectedcapacity under long-term PPAs. PG&E is also the transmission provider for these facilities and two of Southern Power's other solar facilities. Southern Power has evaluated the recoverability of its investments in these solar facilities under various scenarios, including selling the related energy into the competitive markets, and has concluded they are not impaired. At December 31, 2018, Southern Power had outstanding accounts receivables due from PG&E of $1 million related to be placedthe PPAs and $36 million related to the transmission interconnections (of which $17 million is classified in service between 2018other deferred charges and 2020. In addition, in 2016, the Company purchased wind turbine equipment from Siemens Windassets). Southern Power Inc. and Vestas-American Wind Technology, Inc.does not expect a material impact to be used for constructionits financial statements if, as a result of the facilities. Once these wind projects reach commercial operations, theybankruptcy proceedings, PG&E does not perform in accordance with the PPAs or the terms of the PPAs are expected to qualify for 100% PTCs.
Therenegotiated; however, the ultimate outcome of these mattersthis matter cannot be determined at this time.
Fuel Costs
FERC Matters
The Company has authority from the FERC to sell electricity at market-based rates. Since 2008, that authority,Fuel costs for certain balancing authority areas, has been conditioned on compliance with the requirements of an energy auction, which the FERC found to be tailored mitigation that addresses potential market power concerns. In accordance with FERC regulations governing such authority, the traditional electric operating companies and Southern Power are expensed as the Company filed a triennial market power analysis in 2014, which included continued reliance on the energy auction as tailored mitigation. In 2015, the FERC issued an order finding that the traditional electric operating companies'fuel is used. Fuel expense generally includes fuel transportation costs and the Company's existing tailored mitigation may not effectively mitigatecost of purchased emissions allowances as they are used. For Alabama Power and Georgia Power, fuel expense also includes the potential to exert market power in certain areas served byamortization of the cost of nuclear fuel. For the traditional electric operating companies, and in some adjacent areas. The FERC directed the traditional electric operating companies and thefuel costs also include gains and/or losses from fuel-hedging programs as approved by their respective state PSCs.
Cost of Natural Gas
Excluding Atlanta Gas Light, which does not sell natural gas to end-use customers, Southern Company to show why market-based rate authority should not be revoked in these areas or to provide a mitigation plan to further address market power concerns. The traditional electric operating companies and the Company filed a requestGas charges its utility customers for rehearing and filed their response with the FERC in 2015.
In December 2016, the traditional electric operating companies and the Company filed an amendment to their market-based rate tariff that proposed certain changes to the energy auction, as well as several non-tariff changes. On February 2, 2017, the FERC issued an order accepting all such changes subject to an additional condition of cost-based price caps for certain sales outside of the energy auction, finding that all of these changes would provide adequate alternative mitigation for the traditional electric operating companies' and the Company's potential to exert market power in certain areas servednatural gas consumed using natural gas cost recovery mechanisms set by the traditional electric operating companies and in some adjacent areas. On May 17, 2017, the FERC accepted the traditional electric operating companies' and the Company's compliance filing accepting the terms of the order. While the FERC's February 2, 2017 order references the market power proceeding discussed above, it remains a separate, ongoing matter.
On October 25, 2017, the FERC issued an order in response to the traditional electric operating companies' and the Company's June 29, 2017 triennial updated market power analysis. The FERC directed the traditional electric operating companies and the Company to show cause within 60 days why market-based rate authority should not be revoked in certain areas adjacent to the area presently under mitigation in accordance with the February 2, 2017 order or to provide a mitigation plan to further address market power concerns. On November 10, 2017, the traditional electric operating companies and the Company responded to the FERC and proposed to resolve matters by applying the alternative mitigation authorized by the February 2, 2017 order to the adjacent areas made the subject of the October 25, 2017 order.
The ultimate outcome of these matters cannot be determined at this time.
Other Matters
The Company is involved in various other matters being litigated andapplicable state regulatory matters that could affect future earnings. In addition, the Company is subject to certain claims and legal actions arising in the ordinary course of business. The Company's business activities are subject to extensive governmental regulation related to public health and the environment, such as regulation of air emissions and water discharges. Litigation over environmental issues and claims of various types, including property damage, personal injury, common law nuisance, and citizen enforcement of environmental requirements, such as standards for air, water, land, and protection of other natural resources, has occurred throughout the U.S. This litigation has included claims for damages alleged to have been caused by CO2 and other emissions and alleged exposure to hazardous materials, and/or requests for injunctive relief in connection with such matters.
The ultimate outcome of such pending or potential litigation or regulatory matters cannot be predicted at this time; however, for current proceedings not specifically reported herein, management does not anticipate that the ultimate liabilities, if any, arising from such current proceedings would have a material effect on the Company's financial statements.
During 2015, the Company indirectly acquired a 51% membership interest in RE Roserock LLC (Roserock), the owner of the Roserock facility in Pecos County, Texas, which was under construction by Recurrent Energy, LLC and was subsequently placed in service in November 2016. Prior to placing the facility in service, certain solar panels were damaged during installation. While the facility currently is generating energy consistent with operational expectations and PPA obligations, the Company is pursuing remedies under its insurance policies and other contracts to repair or replace these solar panels. In connection therewith, the Company is withholding payments of approximately $26 million from the construction contractor, who has placed a lien on theagencies.
    Table of Contents                                Index to Financial Statements

MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSISCOMBINED NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)
Southern Power Company and Subsidiary Companies 20172018 Annual Report

Roserock facility forUnder these mechanisms, all prudently-incurred natural gas costs are passed through to customers without markup, subject to regulatory review. Southern Company Gas defers or accrues the same amount.difference between the actual cost of natural gas and the amount of commodity revenue earned in a given period such that no operating income is recognized related to these costs. The amounts withhelddeferred or accrued amount is either billed or refunded to customers prospectively through adjustments to the commodity rate. Deferred and accrued natural gas costs are included in other accounts payablethe balance sheets as regulatory assets and regulatory liabilities, respectively.
Southern Company Gas' gas marketing services' customers are charged for actual or estimated natural gas consumed. Within cost of natural gas, Southern Company Gas also includes costs of lost and unaccounted for gas, adjustments to reduce the value of inventories to market value, and gains and losses associated with certain derivatives.
Income Taxes
The registrants use the liability method of accounting for deferred income taxes and provide deferred income taxes for all significant income tax temporary differences. In accordance with regulatory requirements, deferred federal ITCs for the traditional electric operating companies and Southern Company Gas are amortized over the average lives of the related property, with such amortization normally applied as a credit to reduce depreciation in the statements of income.
Under current tax law, certain projects at Southern Power related to the construction of renewable facilities are eligible for federal ITCs. Southern Power estimates eligible costs which, as they relate to acquisitions, may not be finalized until the allocation of the purchase price to assets has been finalized. Southern Power applies the deferred method to ITCs. Under the deferred method, the ITCs are recorded as a deferred credit and amortized to income tax expense over the life of the respective asset. Furthermore, the tax basis of the asset is reduced by 50% of the ITCs received, resulting in a net deferred tax asset. Southern Power has elected to recognize the tax benefit of this basis difference as a reduction to income tax expense in the year in which the plant reaches commercial operation. State ITCs are recognized as an income tax benefit in the period in which the credits are generated. In addition, certain projects are eligible for federal and state PTCs, which are recognized as an income tax benefit based on KWH production.
Federal ITCs and PTCs, as well as state ITCs and other current liabilitiesstate tax credits available to reduce income taxes payable, were not fully utilized in 2018 and will be carried forward and utilized in future years. In addition, Southern Company is expected to have various state net operating loss (NOL) carryforwards for certain of its subsidiaries, which would result in income tax benefits in the future, if utilized. See Note 10 under "Current and Deferred Income TaxesTax Credit Carryforwards" and " Net Operating Loss Carryforwards" for additional information.
The registrants recognize tax positions that are "more likely than not" of being sustained upon examination by the appropriate taxing authorities. See Note 10 under "Unrecognized Tax Benefits" for additional information.
Other Taxes
Taxes imposed on and collected from customers on behalf of governmental agencies are presented net on the Company's consolidated balance sheets. On May 18,registrants' statements of income and are excluded from the transaction price in determining the revenue related to contracts with a customer accounted for under ASC 606.
Southern Company Gas is taxed on its gas revenues by various governmental authorities, but is allowed to recover these taxes from its customers. Revenue taxes imposed on the natural gas distribution utilities are recorded at the amount charged to customers, which may include a small administrative fee, as operating revenues, and the related taxes imposed on Southern Company Gas are recorded as operating expenses on the statements of income. Revenue taxes included in operating expenses were $111 million and $98 million for the successor years ended December 31, 2018 and 2017, Roserock filedrespectively, $31 million for the successor period of July 1, 2016 through December 31, 2016, and $56 million for the predecessor period of January 1, 2016 through June 30, 2016.
Allowance for Funds Used During Construction and Interest Capitalized
The traditional electric operating companies and certain of the natural gas distribution utilities (Atlanta Gas Light, Chattanooga Gas, and Nicor Gas) record AFUDC, which represents the estimated debt and equity costs of capital funds that are necessary to finance the construction of new regulated facilities. While cash is not realized currently, AFUDC increases the revenue requirement and is recovered over the service life of the asset through a lawsuithigher rate base and higher depreciation. The equity component of AFUDC is not taxable.
Interest related to the construction of new facilities at Southern Power and new facilities not included in the state district court in Pecos County, Texas, against XL Insurance America, Inc. (XL)traditional electric operating companies' and North American Elite InsuranceSouthern Company (North American Elite) seeking recovery from an insurance policy for damages resulting from a hail storm and certain installation practices by the construction contractor, McCarthy Building Companies, Inc. (McCarthy). On May 19, 2017, Roserock filed a separate lawsuit against McCarthy in the state district court in Travis County, Texas alleging breach of contract and breach of warranty for the damages sustained at the Roserock facility, which has since been moved to the U.S. District Court for the Western District of Texas. On May 22, 2017, McCarthy filed a counter lawsuit against Roserock, Array Technologies, Inc., Canadian Solar (USA), Inc., XL, and North American Elite in the U.S. District Court for the Western District of Texas alleging, among other things, breach of contract, and requesting foreclosure of mechanic's liens against Roserock. On July 18, 2017, the U.S. District Court for the Western District of Texas consolidated the two pending lawsuits. On December 11, 2017, the U.S. District Court for the Western District of Texas dismissed McCarthy's claims against Canadian Solar (USA), Inc. and dismissed cross-claims that XL and North American Elite had sought to bring against Roserock. The Company intends to vigorously pursue and defend these matters, the ultimate outcome of which cannot be determined at this time.
ACCOUNTING POLICIES
Application of Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates
The Company prepares its consolidated financial statementsGas' regulated rates is capitalized in accordance with GAAP. Significant accounting policies are described in Note 1 to the financial statements. In the application of these policies, certain estimates are made that may have a material impact on the Company's results of operations and related disclosures. Different assumptions and measurements could produce estimates that are significantly different from those recorded in the financial statements. Senior management has reviewed and discussed the following critical accounting policies and estimates with the Audit Committee of Southern Company's Board of Directors.
Revenue Recognition
The Company's revenue recognition depends on appropriate classification and documentation of transactions in accordance with GAAP. In general, the Company's power sale transactions, which include PPAs, can be classified in one of four categories: leases, non-derivatives or normal sale derivatives, derivatives designated as cash flow hedges, and derivatives not designated as hedges. For more information on derivative transactions, see FINANCIAL CONDITION AND LIQUIDITY – "Market Price Risk" herein and Notes 1 and 9 to the financial statements. The Company's revenues are dependent upon significant judgments used to determine the appropriate transaction classification, which must be documented upon the inception of each contract.
Lease Transactions
The Company considers the following factors to determine whether the sales contract is a lease:
Assessing whether specific property is explicitly or implicitly identified in the agreement;
Determining whether the fulfillment of the arrangement is dependent on the use of the identified property; and
Assessing whether the arrangement conveys to the purchaser the right to use the identified property.
If the contract meets the above criteria for a lease, the Company performs further analysis as to whether the lease is classified as operating, financing, or sales-type. All of the Company's power sales contracts that are determined to be leases are accounted for as operating leases and the capacity revenue is recognized on a straight-line basis over the term of the contract and is included in the Company's operating revenues. Energy revenues and other contingent revenues are recognized in the period the energy is delivered or the service is rendered.
Non-Derivative and Normal Sale Derivative Transactions
If the power sales contract is not classified as a lease, the Company further considers the following factors to determine proper classification:
Assessing whether the contract meets the definition of a derivative;
Assessing whether the contract meets the definition of a capacity contract;
Assessing the probability at inception and throughout the term of the individual contract that the contract will result in physical delivery; and
Ensuring that the contract quantities do not exceed available generating capacity (including purchased capacity).standard interest capitalization requirements.
    Table of Contents                                Index to Financial Statements

MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSISCOMBINED NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)
Southern Power Company and Subsidiary Companies 20172018 Annual Report

Contracts that do not meet the definition of a derivative or are designated as normal sales (i.e. capacity contracts which provideTotal AFUDC and interest capitalized for the sale of electricity that involve physical deliveryregistrants in quantities within the Company's available generating capacity) are accounted for2018, 2017, and 2016 was as executory contracts. The related capacity revenue, if any, is recognized on an accrual basis in amounts equal to the lesser of the cumulative levelized amount or the cumulative amount billable under the contract over the respective contract periods. Revenues related to energy and ancillary services are recognized in the period the energy is delivered or the service is rendered.follows:
Cash Flow Hedge Transactions
 Southern CompanyAlabama
Power
Georgia
Power
(a)
Mississippi
Power
(b)
Southern
Power
 (in millions)
2018$210
$84
$94
$
$17
2017249
54
63
72
11
2016327
39
68
124
44
(a)
See Note 2 under "Georgia PowerNuclear Construction" for information on the inclusion of a portion of construction costs related to Plant Vogtle Units 3 and 4 in Georgia Power's rate base.
(b)Mississippi Power's decrease in 2017 resulted from the Kemper IGCC project suspension in June 2017.
 Successor  Predecessor
 Year Ended December 31, 2018Year Ended December 31, 2017
July 1, 2016
through
December 31, 2016
  
January 1, 2016 through
June 30, 2016
 (in millions)  (in millions)
Southern Company Gas$14
$19
$6
  $4
The Company further considers the following in designating other derivative contractsaverage AFUDC composite rates for 2018, 2017, and 2016 for the sale of electricitytraditional electric operating companies and Southern Company Gas were as cash flow hedges of anticipated sale transactions:follows:
Identifying the hedging instrument, the forecasted hedged transaction, and the nature of the risk being hedged; and
Assessing hedge effectiveness at inception and throughout the contract term.
 Alabama
Power
Georgia
Power
Mississippi
Power
20188.3%7.3%3.3%
20178.3%5.6%6.7%
20168.2%6.9%6.5%
These contracts are accounted for on a fair value basis and are recorded in AOCI over the life of the contract. Realized gains and losses are then recognized in operating revenues as incurred.
Mark-to-Market Transactions
 Successor  Predecessor
 Year Ended December 31, 2018Year Ended December 31, 2017
July 1, 2016
through
December 31, 2016
  
January 1, 2016 through
June 30, 2016
Southern Company Gas:      
Atlanta Gas Light(a)
7.9%8.1%4.1%  4.1%
Chattanooga Gas(a)
7.4%7.4%3.7%  3.7%
Nicor Gas(b)
2.1%1.2%1.5%  1.5%
Contracts for sales of electricity, which meet the definition of a derivative and that either do not qualify or are not designated as normal sales or as cash flow hedges, are accounted for on a fair value basis and are recorded in operating revenues.
(a)Fixed rates authorized by the Georgia PSC and Tennessee Public Utilities Commission for Atlanta Gas Light and Chattanooga Gas, respectively.
(b)Variable rate determined by the FERC method of AFUDC accounting.
Impairment of Long-Lived Assets and Intangibles
The Company's investments inregistrants evaluate long-lived assets are primarily generation assets, whether in service or under construction. The Company'sand finite-lived intangible assets arise fromfor impairment when events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying value of such assets may not be recoverable. The determination of whether an impairment has occurred is based on either a specific regulatory disallowance, a sales transaction price that is less than the asset group's carrying value, or an estimate of undiscounted future cash flows attributable to the asset group, as compared with the carrying value of the assets. If an impairment has occurred, the amount of the impairment recognized is determined by either the amount of regulatory disallowance or by estimating the fair value of the assets and recording a loss if the carrying value is greater than the fair value. For assets identified as held for sale, the carrying value is compared to the estimated fair value less the cost to sell in order to determine if an impairment loss is required. Until the assets are disposed of, their estimated fair value is re-evaluated when circumstances or events change. See Note 15 under "Southern Power" for information regarding impairment charges recorded in 2018. Also see "Revenues" and "Leveraged Leases" herein and Note 3 under "Other MattersSouthern Company Gas" for additional information.

COMBINED NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)
Southern Company and Subsidiary Companies 2018 Annual Report

Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets and Liabilities
Southern Power's intangible assets consist primarily of certain acquisitions and consist ofPPAs acquired, PPAs, which are amortized to revenue over the term of the respective PPAs.PPA. Southern Company Gas' goodwill and other intangible assets and liabilities primarily relate to its 2016 acquisition by Southern Company. In addition to these items, Southern Company's goodwill and other intangible assets also relate to its 2016 acquisition of PowerSecure. See Note 15 under "Southern Company Merger with Southern Company Gas" and "Southern Company Acquisition of PowerSecure" for additional information.
Goodwill is not amortized, but is subject to an annual impairment test during the fourth quarter of each year, or more frequently if impairment indicators arise. Southern Company Gas recorded a goodwill impairment charge in the first quarter 2018 related to its disposition of Pivotal Home Solutions. Southern Company and Southern Company Gas each evaluated its goodwill in the fourth quarter 2018 and determined no additional impairment was required. The following table presents 2018 changes in goodwill balances for Southern Company evaluatesand Southern Company Gas:
 Southern Company Southern Company Gas
  Gas Distribution OperationsGas Marketing Services
 (in millions)
Balance at December 31, 2017$6,268
 $4,702
$1,265
Impairment(a)
(42) 
(42)
Dispositions(b)
(910) (668)(242)
Balance at December 31, 2018$5,315
(c) 
$4,034
$981
(a)
On April 11, 2018, Southern Company Gas entered into a stock purchase agreement for the sale of Pivotal Home Solutions. In contemplation of this transaction and based on the purchase price, a goodwill impairment charge of $42 million was recorded in the first quarter 2018. See Note 15 under "Southern Company Gas" for additional information.
(b)
Gas distribution operations reflects goodwill allocated to Elizabethtown Gas, Elkton Gas, and Florida City Gas, which were sold during the third quarter 2018. Gas marketing services reflects goodwill associated with Pivotal Home Solutions, which was sold on June 4, 2018. See Note 15 under "Southern Company Gas" for additional information.
(c)Total does not add due to rounding.

COMBINED NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)
Southern Company and Subsidiary Companies 2018 Annual Report

At December 31, 2018 and 2017, other intangible assets were as follows:
 At December 31, 2018 At December 31, 2017
 Gross Carrying AmountAccumulated AmortizationOther
Intangible Assets, Net
 Gross Carrying AmountAccumulated AmortizationOther
Intangible Assets, Net
 (in millions) (in millions)
Southern Company       
Other intangible assets subject to amortization:       
Customer relationships(a)
$223
$(94)$129
 $288
$(83)$205
Trade names(a)
70
(21)49
 159
(17)142
Storage and transportation contracts64
(54)10
 64
(34)30
PPA fair value adjustments(b)
405
(61)344
 456
(47)409
Other11
(5)6
 17
(5)12
Total other intangible assets subject to amortization$773
$(235)$538

$984
$(186)$798
Other intangible assets not subject to amortization:       
Federal Communications Commission licenses75

75
 75

75
Total other intangible assets$848
$(235)$613

$1,059
$(186)$873
        
Southern Power       
Other intangible assets subject to amortization:       
PPA fair value adjustments(b)
$405
$(61)$344
 $456
$(47)$409
        
Southern Company Gas       
Other intangible assets subject to amortization:       
Gas marketing services(a)
       
Customer relationships$156
$(84)$72
 $221
$(77)$144
Trade names26
(7)19
 115
(9)106
Wholesale gas services       
Storage and transportation contracts64
(54)10
 64
(34)30
Total other intangible assets subject to amortization$246
$(145)$101
 $400
$(120)$280
(a)
Balances as of December 31, 2018 reflect the sale of Pivotal Home Solutions. See Note 15 under "Southern Company GasSale of Pivotal Home Solutions" for additional information.
(b)
Balances as of December 31, 2018 exclude Plant Mankato-related intangible assets that were reclassified as assets held for sale. See Note 15 under "Southern Power – Sales of Natural Gas Plants" for additional information.
Amortization associated with other intangible assets in 2018, 2017, and 2016 was as follows:
 201820172016
 (in millions)
Southern Company$89
$124
$50
Southern Power$25
$25
$10

COMBINED NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)
Southern Company and Subsidiary Companies 2018 Annual Report

 Successor  Predecessor
 Year Ended December 31, 2018Year Ended December 31, 2017
July 1, 2016
through
December 31, 2016
  
January 1, 2016 through
June 30, 2016
 (in millions)  (in millions)
Southern Company Gas:      
Wholesale gas services(a)
$20
$32
$2
  $
Gas marketing services(b)
32
54
32
  8
(a)Recorded as a reduction to operating revenues.
(b)Included in depreciation and amortization.
At December 31, 2018, the carrying valueestimated amortization associated with other intangible assets for the next five years is as follows:
 20192020202120222023
 (in millions)
Southern Company(*)
$61
$50
$43
$39
$38
Southern Power(*)
20
20
20
20
20
Southern Company Gas29
19
13
10
9
(*)
Excludes amounts related to held for sale assets. See Note 15 under "Southern Power – Sales of Natural Gas Plants" for additional information.
Included in other deferred credits and liabilities on the balance sheet is $91 million of intangible liabilities that were recorded during acquisition accounting for transportation contracts at Southern Company Gas. At December 31, 2018, the accumulated amortization of these assets whenever indicatorsintangible liabilities was $74 million. In 2019, the remaining $17 million of potential impairment exist. Examples of impairment indicators could include significant changesamortization associated with the intangible liabilities will be recorded in construction schedules, current period losses combined with a history of losses or a projection of continuing losses, a significant decrease in market prices, and the inability to remarket generating capacity for an extended period. If an indicator exists, the asset is tested for recoverability by comparing the asset carrying value to the sum of the undiscounted expected future cash flows directly attributable to the asset. If the estimate of undiscounted future cash flows is less than the carrying value of the asset, the fair value of the asset is determined and a loss is recorded. A high degree of judgment is required in developing estimates related to these evaluations, which are based on projections of various factors, including the following:
Future demand for electricity based on projections of economic growth and estimates of available generating capacity;
Future power and natural gas prices, which have been quite volatile in recent years; and
Future operating costs.revenues.
Acquisition Accounting
The Company may acquire generation assets as part of its overall growth strategy. At the time of an acquisition, the Companymanagement will assess if thesewhether acquired assets and activities meet the definition of a business. For acquisitions that meet the definition of a business, the Company includes operating results from the date of acquisition are included in its consolidatedthe acquiring entity's financial statements. The purchase price, including any contingent consideration, is allocated based on the fair value of the identifiable assets acquired and liabilities assumed (including any intangible assets). Assets acquired that do not meet the definition of a business are accounted for as an asset acquisition.
The purchase price of each asset acquisition is allocated based on the relative fair value of assets acquired. Determining the fair value of assets acquired and liabilities assumed requires management judgment and the Companymanagement may engage independent valuation experts to assist in this process. Fair values are determined by using market participant assumptions and typically include the timing and amounts of future cash flows, incurred construction costs, the nature of acquired contracts, discount rates, power market prices, and expected asset lives. Any due diligence or transition costs incurred by the Company for potential or successful acquisitions are expensed as incurred.
ContingentHistorically, contingent consideration primarily relates to fixed amounts due to the seller once the facilityan acquired construction project is placed in service. For contingent consideration with variable payments, the Companymanagement fair values the arrangement with any changes recorded in the consolidated statements of income. See Note 8 to the financial statements13 for additional fair value information.

MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS (continued)
Southern Power Company and Subsidiary Companies 2017 Annual Report

Accounting for Income Taxes
The consolidated income tax provision and deferred income tax assets and liabilities, as well as any unrecognized tax benefits and valuation allowances, require significant judgment and estimates. These estimates are supported by historical tax return data, reasonable projections of taxable income, and interpretations of applicable tax laws and regulations across multiple taxing jurisdictions. The effective tax rate reflects the statutory tax rates and calculated apportionments for the various states in which the Company operates.
On behalf of the Company, Southern Company files a consolidated federal income tax return and various state income tax returns, some of which are combined or unitary. Under a joint consolidated income tax allocation agreement, each Southern Company subsidiary's current and deferred tax expense is computed on a stand-alone basis and no subsidiary is allocated more current expense than would be paid if it filed a separate income tax return. Certain deductions and credits can be limited at the consolidated or combined level resulting in NOL and tax credit carryforwards that would not otherwise result on a stand-alone basis. Utilization of NOL and tax credit carryforwards and the assessment of valuation allowances are based on significant judgment and extensive analysis of the Company's, as well as Southern Company's, current financial position and result of operations, including currently available information about future years, to estimate when future taxable income will be realized.
Current and deferred state income tax liabilities and assets are estimated based on laws of multiple states that determine the income to be apportioned to their jurisdictions. States utilize various formulas to calculate the apportionment of taxable income, primarily using sales, assets, or payroll within the jurisdiction compared to the consolidated totals. In addition, each state varies as to whether a stand-alone, combined, or unitary filing methodology is required. The calculation of deferred state taxes considers apportionment factors and filing methodologies that are expected to apply in future years. The apportionments and methodologies which are ultimately finalized in a manner inconsistent with expectations could have a material effect on the Company's financial statements.
Given the significant judgment involved in estimating NOL and tax credit carryforwards and multi-state apportionments for all subsidiaries, the Company considers state deferred income tax liabilities and assets to be critical accounting estimates.
Federal Tax Reform Legislation
Following the enactment of the Tax Reform Legislation, the SEC staff issued Staff Accounting Bulletin 118 – "Income Tax Accounting Implications of the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act" (SAB 118), which provides for a measurement period of up to one year from the enactment date to complete accounting under GAAP for the tax effects of the legislation. Due to the complex and comprehensive nature of the enacted tax law changes, and their application under GAAP, the Company considers all amounts recorded in the financial statements as a result of the Tax Reform Legislation to be "provisional" as discussed in SAB 118 and subject to revision. The Company is awaiting additional guidance from industry and income tax authorities in order to finalize its accounting. The ultimate impact of the Tax Reform Legislation on deferred income tax assets and liabilities cannot be determined at this time. See FUTURE EARNINGS POTENTIAL – "Income Tax Matters – Federal Tax Reform Legislation" herein and Note and 5 to the financial statements under "Current and Deferred Income Taxes" for additional information.
Recently Issued Accounting Standards
Revenue
In 2014, the FASB issued ASC 606, Revenue from Contracts with Customers (ASC 606), replacing the existing accounting standard and industry specific guidance for revenue recognition with a five-step model for recognizing and measuring revenue from contracts with customers. The underlying principle of the new standard is to recognize revenue to depict the transfer of goods or services to customers at the amount expected to be collected. The new standard also requires enhanced disclosures regarding the nature, amount, timing, and uncertainty of revenue and the related cash flows arising from contracts with customers.
The Company has completed the evaluation of all revenue streams and determined that the adoption of ASC 606 will not change the current timing or amounts of revenue recognized in the Company's financial statements. Some contractual arrangements, such as certain capacity and energy payments, are excluded from the scope of ASC 606 and included in the scope of the current leasing guidance or the current derivative guidance.
The new standard is effective for reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2017. The Company applied the modified retrospective method of adoption effective January 1, 2018. The Company also utilized practical expedients which allowed it to apply the standard to open contracts at the date of adoption and to reflect the aggregate effect of all modifications when identifying performance obligations and allocating the transaction price for contracts modified before the effective date. The adoption of ASC 606 did not result in a cumulative adjustment.

MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS (continued)
Southern Power Company and Subsidiary Companies 2017 Annual Report

Leases
In February 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-02, Leases (Topic 842) (ASU 2016-02). ASU 2016-02 requires lessees to recognize on the balance sheet a lease liability and a right-of-use asset for all leases. ASU 2016-02 also changes the recognition, measurement, and presentation of expense associated with leases and provides clarification regarding the identification of certain components of contracts that would represent a lease. The accounting required by lessors is relatively unchanged. ASU 2016-02 is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2018 and the Company will adopt the new standard effective January 1, 2019.
The Company is currently implementing an information technology system along with the related changes to internal controls and accounting policies that will support the accounting for leases under ASU 2016-02. In addition, the Company has substantially completed a detailed inventory and analysis of its leases where the majority relate to land leases for its renewable generation facilities. While the Company has not yet determined the ultimate impact, adoption of ASU 2016-02 is expected to have a significant impact on the Company's balance sheet for lessee arrangements.
Other
In November 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-18, Statement of Cash Flows (Topic 230): Restricted Cash (ASU 2016-18). ASU 2016-18 eliminates the need to reflect transfers between cash and restricted cash in operating, investing, and financing activities in the statement of cash flows. Upon adoption, the net change in cash and cash equivalents during the period will include amounts generally described as restricted cash or restricted cash equivalents. ASU 2016-18 is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2017, and will be applied retrospectively to each period presented. The Company adopted ASU 2016-18 effective January 1, 2018 with no material impact on its financial statements.
On March 10, 2017, the FASB issued ASU No. 2017-07, Compensation - Retirement Benefits (Topic 715): Improving the Presentation of Net Periodic Pension Cost and Net Periodic Postretirement Benefit Cost (ASU 2017-07). ASU 2017-07 requires that an employer report the service cost component in the same line item or items as other compensation costs and requires the other components of net periodic pension and postretirement benefit costs to be separately presented in other income (expense) in the income statement. Additionally, only the service cost component related to construction labor is eligible for capitalization, when applicable. The Company adopted ASU 2017-07 which is effective for periods beginning after December 15, 2017; however, since the Company only became a sponsor of a qualified pension plan and postretirement benefit plan in December 2017, no retrospective presentation of net periodic benefits costs for 2016 or 2017 is required. See Note 2 to the financial statements for additional information.
On August 28, 2017, the FASB issued ASU No. 2017-12, Derivatives and Hedging (Topic 815): Targeted Improvements to Accounting for Hedging Activities (ASU 2017-12), amending the hedge accounting recognition and presentation requirements. ASU 2017-12 makes more financial and non-financial hedging strategies eligible for hedge accounting, amends the related presentation and disclosure requirements, and simplifies hedge effectiveness assessment requirements. ASU 2017-12 is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2018, with early adoption permitted. The Company adopted ASU 2017-12 effective January 1, 2018 with no material impact on its financial statements.
FINANCIAL CONDITION AND LIQUIDITY
Overview
The Company's financial condition remained stable at December 31, 2017. The Company's cash requirements primarily consist of funding ongoing business operations, common stock dividends, distributions to noncontrolling interests, capital expenditures, and debt maturities. Capital expenditures and other investing activities may include investments in acquisitions or new construction associated with the Company's overall growth strategy and to maintain the existing generation fleet's performance. Operating cash flows, which may include the utilization of tax credits, will only provide a portion of the Company's cash needs. For the three-year period from 2018 through 2020, the Company's projected dividends, capital expenditures, and debt maturities are expected to exceed operating cash flows. The Company plans to finance future cash needs in excess of its operating cash flows primarily through debt issuances, borrowings from financial institutions, and equity contributions from Southern Company. The Company intends to continue to monitor its access to short-term and long-term capital markets as well as bank credit agreements as needed to meet its future capital and liquidity needs. See "Sources of Capital" herein for additional information on lines of credit.
The Company also anticipates utilizing third-party tax equity partnerships as one of the financing sources to fund its renewable growth strategy where the tax partner will take significantly all of the federal tax benefits. These tax equity partnerships are expected to be consolidated in the Company's financial statements using a HLBV methodology to allocate partnership gains and losses to the Company. The Company recently secured third-party tax equity funding for the Cactus Flats project subject to

MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS (continued)
Southern Power Company and Subsidiary Companies 2017 Annual Report

achieving commercial operation and various other customary conditions to closing as well as for the Gaskell West 1 project. The ultimate outcome of these matters cannot be determined at this time.
In addition, the Company is pursuing the sale of a 33% equity interest in a newly-formed holding company that owns substantially all of the Company's solar assets, which, if successful, is expected to close in the middle of 2018. Proceeds from the sale may be used for debt redemptions, common stock dividends, working capital, and general corporate purposes as well to support the Company's continuing growth strategy.
Net cash provided from operating activities totaled $1.2 billion in 2017, an increase of $816 million compared to 2016. The increase in net cash provided from operating activities was primarily due to income tax refunds received and an increase in energy sales from new solar and wind facilities, partially offset by an increase in interest paid.As of December 31, 2017, the Company had $2.0 billion of unutilized ITCs and PTCs which are not expected to be fully utilized until 2027. See FUTURE EARNINGS POTENTIAL – "Income Tax Matters – Tax Credits" herein for additional information. Net cash provided from operating activities totaled $339 million in 2016, a decrease of $664 million compared to 2015 primarily due to an increase in unutilized ITCs and PTCs.
Net cash used for investing activities totaled $1.6 billion, $4.8 billion, and $2.5 billion in 2017, 2016, and 2015, respectively, and was primarily due to acquisitions and the construction of renewable and natural gas facilities. See FUTURE EARNINGS POTENTIAL – "Acquisitions" and "Construction Projects" herein for additional information.
Net cash used for financing activities totaled $502 million in 2017 primarily due to payments of common stock dividends and distributions to noncontrolling interests. Net cash provided from financing activities totaled $4.7 billion in 2016 primarily due to the issuance of additional senior notes and capital contributions from Southern Company and noncontrolling interests. Net cash provided from financing activities totaled $2.3 billion in 2015 primarily due to the issuance of additional senior notes and a 13-month term loan.
Significant balance sheet changes include a $1.0 billion increase in plant in service primarily due to new solar and wind facilities being acquired or placed in service, a $284 million increase in deferred income taxes primarily due to additional unutilized PTCs, and a $113 million increase in CWIP primarily due to the construction of a new wind facility and the Mankato natural gas expansion project. In addition, ITC benefits that are deferred and amortized over the asset lives increased $45 million as a result of additional ITCs from new solar facilities being placed in service, offset by ongoing ITC amortization. Other significant changes include a $970 million decrease in cash and cash equivalents and a $456 million decrease in acquisitions payable.
Sources of Capital
The Company plans to obtain the funds required for acquisitions, construction, development, debt maturities, and other purposes from operating cash flows, external securities issuances, borrowings from financial institutions, tax equity partnership contributions, and equity contributions from Southern Company. The Company also plans to utilize funds resulting from any potential sale of a 33% equity interest in substantially all of its solar asset portfolio, if completed. However, the amount, type, and timing of any future financings, if needed, will depend upon prevailing market conditions, regulatory approval, and other factors. With respect to the public offering of securities, the Company (excluding its subsidiaries) issues and offers debt registered on registration statements filed with the SEC under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended.
At December 31, 2017, the Company's current liabilities exceeded current assets by $474 million due to long-term debt maturing in the next 12 months, the use of short-term debt as a funding source, and fluctuations in cash needs, due to both seasonality and the stage of acquisitions and construction projects. The Company believes the need for working capital can be adequately met by utilizing the commercial paper program, the Facility (as defined below), borrowings from financial institutions, the debt capital markets, the commercial paper program, and operating cash flows.
The Company obtains financing separately without credit support from any affiliate. To meet liquidity and capital resource requirements, the Company had cash and cash equivalents of approximately $129 million at December 31, 2017.
The Company's commercial paper program is used to finance acquisition and construction costs related to electric generating facilities and for general corporate purposes, including maturing debt. The Company's subsidiaries are not issuers under the commercial paper program.

MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS (continued)
Southern Power Company and Subsidiary Companies 2017 Annual Report

Details of commercial paper were as follows:
 
Commercial Paper at the
End of the Period
 
Commercial Paper During the Period (*)
 Amount Outstanding Weighted Average Interest Rate Average Amount Outstanding Weighted Average Interest Rate Maximum Amount Outstanding
 (in millions)   (in millions)   (in millions)
December 31, 2017$105
 2.0% $232
 1.4% $628
December 31, 2016$
 N/A $56
 0.8% $310
December 31, 2015$
 N/A $166
 0.5% $385
(*)Average and maximum amounts are based upon daily balances during the twelve-month periods ended December 31, 2017, 2016, and 2015.
Company Credit Facilities
At December 31, 2017, the Company had a committed credit facility (Facility) of $750 million expiring in 2022, of which $22 million has been used for letters of credit and $728 million remains unused. In May 2017, the Company amended the Facility, which, among other things, extended the maturity date from 2020 to 2022 and increased the Company's borrowing ability under this Facility to $750 million from $600 million. The Company's subsidiaries are not borrowers under the Facility. Proceeds from the Facility may be used for working capital and general corporate purposes as well as liquidity support for the Company's commercial paper program. Subject to applicable market conditions, the Company expects to renew or replace the Facility, as needed, prior to expiration. In connection therewith, the Company may extend the maturity date and/or increase or decrease the lending commitment thereunder. See Note 6 to the financial statements under "Bank Credit Arrangements" for additional information.
The Facility, as well as the Company's term loan agreements, contains a covenant that limits the ratio of debt to capitalization (as defined in the Facility) to a maximum of 65% and contains a cross-default provision that is restricted only to indebtedness of the Company. For purposes of this definition, debt excludes any project debt incurred by certain subsidiaries of the Company to the extent such debt is non-recourse to the Company, and capitalization excludes the capital stock or other equity attributable to such subsidiary. The Company is currently in compliance with all covenants in the Facility.
The Company also has a $120 million continuing letter of credit facility expiring in 2019 for standby letters of credit. At December 31, 2017, $101 million has been used for letters of credit, primarily as credit support for PPA requirements, and $19 million remains unused. The Company's subsidiaries are not parties to this letter of credit facility.
In addition, at both December 31, 2017 and 2016, the Company had $113 million of cash collateral posted related to PPA requirements.
Subsidiary Project Credit Facilities
In connection with the construction of solar facilities by RE Tranquillity LLC, RE Garland Holdings LLC, and RE Roserock LLC, indirect subsidiaries of the Company, each subsidiary had entered into separate credit agreements (Project Credit Facilities), which were non-recourse to the Company (other than the subsidiary party to the agreement). Each Project Credit Facility provided (a) a senior secured construction loan credit facility, (b) a senior secured bridge loan facility, and (c) a senior secured letter of credit facility that was secured by the membership interests of the respective project company, with proceeds directed to finance project costs related to the respective solar facilities. Each Project Credit Facility was secured by the assets of the applicable project subsidiary and membership interests of the applicable project subsidiary. The Tranquillity, Garland, and Roserock Project Credit Facilities were fully repaid on October 14, 2016, December 29, 2016, and January 31, 2017, respectively.
Furthermore, in connection with the acquisition of the Henrietta solar facility on July 1, 2016, a subsidiary of the Company assumed a $217 million construction loan, which was fully repaid in September 2016.
Financing Activities
Senior Notes
In November 2017, the Company issued $525 million aggregate principal amount of Series 2017A Floating Rate Senior Notes due December 20, 2020, which bear interest based on three-month LIBOR. The net proceeds were used to redeem all of the $500

MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS (continued)
Southern Power Company and Subsidiary Companies 2017 Annual Report

million aggregate principal amount of Series 2015D 1.85% Senior Notes due December 1, 2017 and to repay a portion of the Company's outstanding short-term debt.
In addition to any financings that may be necessary to meet capital requirements and contractual obligations, the Company plans to continue, when economically feasible, a program to retire higher-cost securities and replace these obligations with lower-cost capital if market conditions permit.
Other Debt
In September 2017, the Company amended its $60 million aggregate principal amount floating rate term loan to, among other things, increase the aggregate principal amount to $100 million and extend the maturity date from September 2017 to October 2018. The additional $40 million of proceeds were used to repay existing indebtedness and for other general corporate purposes. At December 31, 2017, this outstanding term loan was included in securities due within one year.
In addition, during 2017, the Company issued a total of $21 million in letters of credit under the Company's credit facilities.
Credit Rating Risk
The Company does not have any credit arrangements that would require material changes in payment schedules or terminations as a result of a credit rating downgrade.
There are certain contracts that could require collateral, but not accelerated payment, in the event of a credit rating change to BBB and/or Baa2 or below. These contracts are for physical electricity purchases and sales, fuel transportation and storage, energy price risk management, and transmission.
The maximum potential collateral requirements under these contracts at December 31, 2017 were as follows:
Credit RatingsMaximum Potential Collateral Requirements
 (in millions)
At BBB and/or Baa2$39
At BBB- and/or Baa3$415
At BB+ and/or Ba1 (*)
$1,118
(*)
Any additional credit rating downgrades at or below BB- and/or Ba3 could increase collateral requirements up to an additional $38 million.
Included in these amounts are certain agreements that could require collateral in the event that Alabama Power or Georgia Power has a credit rating change to below investment grade. Generally, collateral may be provided by a Southern Company guaranty, letter of credit, or cash. Additionally, a credit rating downgrade could impact the ability of the Company to access capital markets and would be likely to impact the cost at which it does so.
In addition, the Company has a PPA that could require collateral, but not accelerated payment, in the event of a downgrade of the Company's credit. The PPA requires credit assurances without stating a specific credit rating. The amount of collateral required would depend upon actual losses resulting from a credit downgrade.
On March 24, 2017, S&P revised its consolidated credit rating outlook for Southern Company and its subsidiaries (including the Company) from stable to negative.
While it is unclear how the credit rating agencies may respond to the Tax Reform Legislation, certain financial metrics, such as the funds from operations to debt percentage, used by the credit rating agencies to assess Southern Company and its subsidiaries, including the Company, may be negatively impacted. Absent actions by the Company to mitigate the resulting impacts, which, among other alternatives, could include adjusting the Company's capital structure, the Company's credit ratings could be negatively affected.
Market Price Risk
The Company is exposed to market risks, primarily commodity price risk, interest rate risk, and occasionally foreign currency exchange rate risk. To manage the volatility attributable to these exposures, the Company nets its exposures, where possible, to take advantage of natural offsets and enters into various derivative transactions for the remaining exposures pursuant to the Company's policies in areas such as counterparty exposure and risk management practices. The Company's policy is that derivatives are to be used primarily for hedging purposes and mandates strict adherence to all applicable risk management

MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS (continued)
Southern Power Company and Subsidiary Companies 2017 Annual Report

policies. Derivative positions are monitored using techniques including, but not limited to, market valuation, value at risk, stress testing, and sensitivity analysis. Derivative instruments are recognized at fair value in the consolidated balance sheets as either assets or liabilities and are presented on a gross basis. In the statements of cash flows, the cash impacts of settled energy-related and interest rate derivatives are recorded as operating activities.
At December 31, 2017, the Company had $945 million of long-term variable rate notes outstanding. If the Company sustained a 100 basis point change in interest rates for its variable interest rate exposure, the change would effect annualized interest expense by approximately $9 million at December 31, 2017. Since a significant portion of outstanding indebtedness bears interest at fixed rates, the Company is not aware of any facts or circumstances that would significantly affect exposure on existing indebtedness in the near term. However, the impact on future financing costs cannot be determined at this time.
The Company had foreign currency denominated debt of €1.1 billion at December 31, 2017. The Company has mitigated its exposure to foreign currency exchange rate risk through the use of foreign currency swaps converting all interest and principal payments to fixed-rate U.S. dollars.
Because energy from the Company's facilities is primarily sold under long-term PPAs with tolling agreements and provisions shifting substantially all of the responsibility for fuel cost to the counterparties, the Company's exposure to market volatility in commodity fuel prices and prices of electricity is generally limited. However, the Company has been and may continue to be exposed to market volatility in energy-related commodity prices as a result of uncontracted generating capacity.
For the years ended December 31, 2017 and 2016, the changes in fair value of energy-related derivative contracts associated with both power and natural gas positions were as follows:
 20172016
 (in millions)
Contracts outstanding at the beginning of period, assets (liabilities), net$16
$1
Contracts realized or settled(17)(3)
Current period changes (*)
(9)18
Contracts outstanding at the end of period, assets (liabilities), net$(10)$16
(*)Current period changes also include changes in the fair value of new contracts entered into during the period, if any.
For the years ending December 31, 2017 and 2016, the changes in contracts outstanding were attributable to both the volume and the prices of power and natural gas as follows:
 20172016
Power – net sold  
MWH (in millions)3.0
6.1
Weighted average contract cost per MWH above (below) market prices (in dollars)$(2.67)$1.45
Natural Gas – net purchased  
Commodity - mmBtu (in millions)14.4
27.1
Commodity - weighted average contract cost per mmBtu above (below) market prices (in dollars)$0.12
$(0.27)
Gains and losses on energy-related derivatives designated as cash flow hedges which are used by the Company to hedge anticipated purchases and sales are initially deferred in OCI before being recognized in income in the same period as the hedged transactions are reflected in earnings. Gains and losses on energy-related derivative contracts that are not designated or fail to qualify as hedges are recognized in the consolidated statements of income as incurred.
The Company uses over-the-counter contracts that are not exchange traded but are fair valued using prices which are market observable, and thus fall into Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy. See Note 8 to the financial statements for further discussion of fair value measurements. The energy-related derivative contracts outstanding at December 31, 2017 all mature in 2018.
The Company is exposed to losses related to financial instruments in the event of counterparties' nonperformance. The Company only enters into agreements and material transactions with counterparties that have investment grade credit ratings by S&P and Moody's or with counterparties who have posted collateral to cover potential credit exposure. The Company has also established risk management policies and controls to determine and monitor the creditworthiness of counterparties in order to mitigate the Company's exposure to counterparty credit risk. Therefore, the Company does not anticipate a material adverse effect on the financial statements as a result of counterparty nonperformance. See Note 1 to the financial statements under "Financial Instruments" and Note 9 to the financial statements for additional information.

MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS (continued)
Southern Power Company and Subsidiary Companies 2017 Annual Report

Capital Requirements and Contractual Obligations
The capital program of the Company is subject to periodic review and revision and is currently estimated to total $7.2 billion over the next five years through 2022. This includes approximately $0.9 billion in committed construction, capital improvements, and work to be performed under LTSAs, totaling approximately $400 million for 2018 and an average of approximately $137 million each year from 2019 through 2022. In addition, the capital program includes a further $6.3 billion in planned expenditures for plant acquisitions and placeholder growth, which averages approximately $1.3 billion per year. Planned expenditures for plant acquisitions and placeholder growth may vary materially due to market opportunities and the Company's ability to execute its growth strategy. Actual construction costs may vary from these estimates because of numerous factors such as: changes in business conditions; changes in the expected environmental compliance program; changes in environmental laws and regulations; the outcome of any legal challenges to the environmental rules; changes in FERC rules and regulations; changes in load projections; changes in legislation; the cost and efficiency of construction labor, equipment, and materials; project scope and design changes; and the cost of capital. See Note 11 to the financial statements for additional information.
Other funding requirements related to obligations associated with scheduled maturities of long-term debt, as well as the related interest, leases, derivative obligations, other purchase commitments, and pension and other postretirement benefit plans are detailed in the contractual obligations table that follows. See Notes 1, 2, 5, 6, 7, and 9 to the financial statements for additional information.

MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS (continued)
Southern Power Company and Subsidiary Companies 2017 Annual Report

Contractual Obligations
Contractual obligations at December 31, 2017 were as follows:
 2018 
2019-
2020
 
2021-
2022
 
After
2022
 Total
 (in millions)
Long-term debt(a) —
         
Principal$770
 $1,425
 $977
 $2,630
 $5,802
Interest189
 334
 278
 1,524
 2,325
Financial derivative obligations(b)
13
 
 
 
 13
Operating leases(c)
22
 45
 45
 815
 927
Purchase commitments —         
Capital(d)
1,099
 3,661
 1,750
 
 6,510
Fuel(e)
453
 555
 327
 56
 1,391
Purchased power(f)
40
 82
 42
 
 164
Other(g)
149
 315
 216
 1,770
 2,450
Pension and other postretirement benefit plans(h)

 1
 
 
 1
Total$2,735
 $6,418
 $3,635
 $6,795
 $19,583
(a)All amounts are reflected based on final maturity dates and include the effects of interest rate derivatives employed to manage interest rate risk and effects of foreign currency swaps employed to manage foreign currency exchange rate risk. Included in debt principal is a $77 million gain related to the foreign currency hedge of €1.1 billion. The Company plans to continue, when economically feasible, to retire higher-cost securities and replace these obligations with lower-cost capital if market conditions permit.
(b)For additional information, see Notes 1 and 9 to the financial statements.
(c)Operating lease commitments include certain land leases for solar and wind facilities that are subject to annual price escalation based on indices. See Note 7 to the financial statements under "Commitments" for additional information.
(d)The Company provides estimated capital expenditures for a five-year period, including capital expenditures associated with environmental regulations. Included in these amounts are planned expenditures for plant acquisitions and placeholder growth, which averages approximately $1.3 billion per year, and may vary materially each year due to market opportunities and the Company's ability to execute its growth strategy. Amounts represent current estimates of total expenditures, excluding capital expenditures covered under LTSAs which are reflected in "Other." See Note (g) below. At December 31, 2017, significant purchase commitments were outstanding in connection with the construction program.
(e)Primarily includes commitments to purchase, transport, and store natural gas. Amounts reflected are based on contracted cost and may contain provisions for price escalation. Amounts reflected for natural gas purchase commitments are based on various indices at the time of delivery and have been estimated based on the New York Mercantile Exchange future prices at December 31, 2017.
(f)Purchased power commitments will be resold under a third party agreement at cost.
(g)Includes commitments related to LTSAs, operation and maintenance agreements, and transmission. LTSAs include price escalation based on inflation indices. Transmission commitments are based on the Southern Company system's current tariff rate for point-to-point transmission.
(h)The Company forecasts contributions to the pension and other postretirement benefit plans over a three-year period. The Company anticipates no mandatory contributions to the qualified pension plan during the next three years. Amounts presented represent estimated benefit payments for the nonqualified pension plans, estimated non-trust benefit payments for the other postretirement benefit plans, and estimated contributions to the other postretirement benefit plan trusts, all of which will be made from the Company's corporate assets. See Note 2 to the financial statements for additional information related to the pension and other postretirement benefit plans, including estimated benefit payments. Certain benefit payments will be made through the related benefit plans. Other benefit payments will be made from the Company's corporate assets.

MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS (continued)
Southern Power Company and Subsidiary Companies 2017 Annual Report

Cautionary Statement Regarding Forward-Looking Statements
The Company's 2017 Annual Report contains forward-looking statements. Forward-looking statements include, among other things, statements concerning the strategic goals for the Company's business, economic conditions, fuel and environmental cost recovery, current and proposed environmental regulations and related compliance plans and estimated expenditures, pending or potential litigation matters, access to sources of capital, financing activities, estimated sales and purchases under power sale and purchase agreements, timing of expected future capacity need in existing markets, completion dates of construction projects, projections for the qualified pension plan and postretirement benefit plans contributions, filings with federal regulatory authorities, impacts of the Tax Reform Legislation, federal and state income tax benefits, and estimated construction and other plans and expenditures. In some cases, forward-looking statements can be identified by terminology such as "may," "will," "could," "should," "expects," "plans," "anticipates," "believes," "estimates," "projects," "predicts," "potential," or "continue" or the negative of these terms or other similar terminology. There are various factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from those suggested by the forward-looking statements; accordingly, there can be no assurance that such indicated results will be realized. These factors include:
the impact of recent and future federal and state regulatory changes, including environmental laws and regulations governing air, water, land, and protection of other natural resources, and also changes in tax and other laws and regulations to which the Company is subject, as well as changes in application of existing laws and regulations;
the uncertainty surrounding the recently enacted Tax Reform Legislation, including implementing regulations and IRS interpretations, actions that may be taken in response by regulatory authorities, and its impact, if any, on the credit ratings of the Company;
current and future litigation or regulatory investigations, proceedings, or inquiries;
the effects, extent, and timing of the entry of additional competition in the markets in which the Company operates;
variations in demand for electricity, including those relating to weather, the general economy, population and business growth (and declines), the effects of energy conservation and efficiency measures, including from the development and deployment of alternative energy sources such as self-generation and distributed generation technologies, and any potential economic impacts resulting from federal fiscal decisions;
available sources and costs of fuels;
transmission constraints;
effects of inflation;
the ability to control costs and avoid cost overruns during the development and construction of generating facilities, to construct facilities in accordance with the requirements of permits and licenses, and to satisfy any environmental performance standards, including the requirements of tax credits and other incentives;
investment performance of the Company's employee and retiree benefit plans;
advances in technology;
ongoing renewable energy partnerships and development agreements;
state and federal rate regulations;
the ability to successfully operate generating facilities and the successful performance of necessary corporate functions;
internal restructuring or other restructuring options that may be pursued;
potential business strategies, including acquisitions or dispositions of assets or businesses, including the potential sale of a 33% equity interest in substantially all of the Company's solar assets, which cannot be assured to be completed or beneficial to the Company;
the ability of counterparties of the Company to make payments as and when due and to perform as required;
the ability to obtain new short- and long-term contracts with wholesale customers;
the direct or indirect effect on the Company's business resulting from cyber intrusion or physical attack and the threat of physical attacks;
interest rate fluctuations and financial market conditions and the results of financing efforts;
changes in the Company's credit ratings, including impacts on interest rates, access to capital markets, and collateral requirements;
the impacts of any sovereign financial issues, including impacts on interest rates, access to capital markets, impacts on foreign currency exchange rates, counterparty performance, and the economy in general;

MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS (continued)
Southern Power Company and Subsidiary Companies 2017 Annual Report

the ability of the Company to obtain additional generating capacity (or sell excess generating capacity) at competitive prices;
catastrophic events such as fires, earthquakes, explosions, floods, tornadoes, hurricanes and other storms, droughts, pandemic health events such as influenzas, or other similar occurrences;
the direct or indirect effects on the Company's business resulting from incidents affecting the U.S. electric grid or operation of generating resources;
the effect of accounting pronouncements issued periodically by standard-setting bodies; and
other factors discussed elsewhere herein and in other reports filed by the Company from time to time with the SEC.
The Company expressly disclaims any obligation to update any forward-looking statements.

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME
For the Years Ended December 31, 2017, 2016, and 2015
Southern Power Company and Subsidiary Companies 2017 Annual Report
 2017
 2016
 2015
 (in millions)
Operating Revenues:     
Wholesale revenues, non-affiliates$1,671
 $1,146
 $964
Wholesale revenues, affiliates392
 419
 417
Other revenues12
 12
 9
Total operating revenues2,075
 1,577
 1,390
Operating Expenses:     
Fuel621
 456
 441
Purchased power149
 102
 93
Other operations and maintenance386
 354
 260
Depreciation and amortization503
 352
 248
Taxes other than income taxes48
 23
 22
Total operating expenses1,707
 1,287
 1,064
Operating Income368
 290
 326
Other Income and (Expense):     
Interest expense, net of amounts capitalized(191) (117) (77)
Other income (expense), net1
 6
 1
Total other income and (expense)(190) (111) (76)
Earnings Before Income Taxes178
 179
 250
Income taxes (benefit)(939) (195) 21
Net Income1,117
 374
 229
Less: Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests46
 36
 14
Net Income Attributable to the Company$1,071
 $338
 $215
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME
For the Years Ended December 31, 2017, 2016, and 2015
Southern Power Company and Subsidiary Companies 2017 Annual Report
 2017
 2016
 2015
 (in millions)
Net Income$1,117
 $374
 $229
Other comprehensive income (loss):     
Qualifying hedges:     
Changes in fair value, net of tax of $39, $(17), and $-, respectively63
 (27) 
Reclassification adjustment for amounts included in net income,
net of tax of $(46), $36, and $-, respectively
(73) 58
 1
Total other comprehensive income (loss)(10) 31
 1
Less: Comprehensive income attributable to noncontrolling interests46
 36
 14
Comprehensive Income Attributable to the Company$1,061
 $369
 $216
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.


CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
For the Years Ended December 31, 2017, 2016, and 2015
Southern Power Company and Subsidiary Companies 2017 Annual Report
 2017
 2016
 2015
 (in millions)
Operating Activities:     
Net income$1,117
 $374
 $229
Adjustments to reconcile net income
to net cash provided from operating activities —
     
Depreciation and amortization, total536
 370
 254
Deferred income taxes(263) (1,063) 42
Investment tax credits
 
 162
Amortization of investment tax credits(57) (37) (19)
Collateral deposits(4) (102) 
Accrued income taxes, non-current14
 (109) 109
Income taxes receivable, non-current(61) (13) 
Other, net(9) 12
 (2)
Changes in certain current assets and liabilities —     
-Receivables(60) (54) 18
-Other current assets(4) (25) (30)
-Accrued taxes(55) 940
 269
-Other current liabilities1
 46
 (29)
Net cash provided from operating activities1,155
 339
 1,003
Investing Activities:     
Business acquisitions(1,032) (2,294) (1,719)
Property additions(268) (2,114) (1,005)
Change in construction payables(153) (57) 251
Investment in restricted cash(16) (733) (159)
Distribution of restricted cash34
 736
 154
Payments pursuant to LTSAs and for equipment not yet received(203) (350) (82)
Other investing activities15
 15
 22
Net cash used for investing activities(1,623) (4,797) (2,538)
Financing Activities:     
Increase (decrease) in notes payable, net(104) 73
 (58)
Proceeds —     
Capital contributions
 1,850
 646
Senior notes525
 2,831
 1,650
Other long-term debt43
 65
 402
Redemptions —     
Senior notes(500) (200) (525)
Other long-term debt(18) (86) (4)
Distributions to noncontrolling interests(119) (57) (18)
Capital contributions from noncontrolling interests80
 682
 341
Purchase of membership interests from noncontrolling interests(59) (129) 
Payment of common stock dividends(317) (272) (131)
Other financing activities(33) (30) (13)
Net cash provided from (used for) financing activities
(502) 4,727
 2,290
Net Change in Cash and Cash Equivalents(970) 269
 755
Cash and Cash Equivalents at Beginning of Year1,099
 830
 75
Cash and Cash Equivalents at End of Year$129
 $1,099
 $830
Supplemental Cash Flow Information:     
Cash paid (received) during the period for —     
Interest (net of $11, $44, and $14 capitalized, respectively)$189
 $89
 $74
Income taxes (net of refunds and investment tax credits)(487) 116
 (518)
Noncash transactions —     
Accrued property additions at year-end32
 251
 257
Accrued acquisitions at year-end
 461
 

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
At December 31, 2017 and 2016
Southern Power Company and Subsidiary Companies 2017 Annual Report
Assets2017
 2016
 (in millions)
Current Assets:   
Cash and cash equivalents$129
 $1,099
Receivables —   
Customer accounts receivable117
 102
Affiliated50
 57
Other98
 34
Materials and supplies278
 337
Prepaid income taxes50
 74
Other current assets36
 54
Total current assets758
 1,757
Property, Plant, and Equipment:   
In service13,755
 12,728
Less: Accumulated provision for depreciation1,910
 1,484
Plant in service, net of depreciation11,845
 11,244
Construction work in progress511
 398
Total property, plant, and equipment12,356
 11,642
Other Property and Investments:   
Intangible assets, net of amortization of $47 and $22
at December 31, 2017 and December 31, 2016, respectively
411
 436
Total other property and investments411
 436
Deferred Charges and Other Assets:   
Prepaid LTSAs118
 101
Accumulated deferred income taxes925
 594
Income taxes receivable, non-current72
 11
Other deferred charges and assets566
 628
Total deferred charges and other assets1,681
 1,334
Total Assets$15,206
 $15,169
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
At December 31, 2017 and 2016
Southern Power Company and Subsidiary Companies 2017 Annual Report
Liabilities and Stockholders' Equity2017
 2016
 (in millions)
Current Liabilities:   
Securities due within one year$770
 $560
Notes payable105
 209
Accounts payable —   
Affiliated102
 88
Other103
 278
Accrued taxes —   
Accrued income taxes
 148
Other accrued taxes4
 7
Acquisitions payable5
 461
Other current liabilities143
 152
Total current liabilities1,232
 1,903
Long-Term Debt:   
Senior notes —   
1.50% due 2018
 350
1.95% due 2019600
 600
2.375% due 2020300
 300
2.50% due 2021300
 300
1.00% due 2022720
 632
1.85% to 5.25% due 2023-20462,664
 2,592
Other long-term debt —   
Variable rate (1.88% at 12/31/17) due 2018
 320
Variable rate (2.18% at 12/31/17) due 2020525
 
Variable rate (3.75% at 1/1/17) due 2032-2036
 15
Unamortized debt premium (discount), net(10) (12)
Unamortized debt issuance expense(28) (29)
Long-term debt5,071
 5,068
Deferred Credits and Other Liabilities:   
Accumulated deferred income taxes199
 152
Accumulated deferred ITCs1,884
 1,839
Other deferred credits and liabilities322
 368
Total deferred credits and other liabilities2,405
 2,359
Total Liabilities8,708
 9,330
Redeemable Noncontrolling Interests
 164
Common Stockholder's Equity:   
Common stock, par value $0.01 per share —   
Authorized — 1,000,000 shares   
Outstanding — 1,000 shares
 
Paid-in capital3,662
 3,671
Retained earnings1,478
 724
Accumulated other comprehensive income(2) 35
Total common stockholder's equity5,138
 4,430
Noncontrolling Interests1,360
 1,245
Total Stockholders' Equity6,498
 5,675
Total Liabilities and Stockholders' Equity$15,206
 $15,169
Commitments and Contingent Matters (See notes)

 
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY
For the Years Ended December 31, 2017, 2016, and 2015
Southern Power Company and Subsidiary Companies 2017 Annual Report
 Number of Common Shares Issued Common Stock Paid-In Capital Retained Earnings
 Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income Total Common Stockholder's Equity 
Noncontrolling Interests(a)
 Total
 (in millions)
Balance at December 31, 2014
 $
 $1,176
 $573
 $3
 $1,752
 $219
 $1,971
Net income attributable
   to Southern Power

 
 
 215
 
 215
 
 215
Capital contributions from
   parent company

 
 646
 
 
 646
 
 646
Other comprehensive income
 
 
 
 1
 1
 
 1
Cash dividends on common
   stock

 
 
 (131) 
 (131) 
 (131)
Capital contributions from
   noncontrolling interests

 
 
 
 
 
 567
 567
Distributions to noncontrolling
   interests

 
 
 
 
 
 (17) (17)
Net loss attributable to
   noncontrolling interests

 
 
 
 
 
 12
 12
Balance at December 31, 2015
 
 1,822
 657
 4
 2,483
 781
 3,264
Net income attributable
   to Southern Power

 
 
 338
 
 338
 
 338
Capital contributions from
   parent company

 
 1,850
 
 
 1,850
 
 1,850
Other comprehensive income
 
 
 
 31
 31
 
 31
Cash dividends on common
   stock

 
 
 (272) 
 (272) 
 (272)
Capital contributions from
   noncontrolling interests

 
 
 
 
 
 618
 618
Distributions to noncontrolling
   interests

 
 
 
 
 
 (57) (57)
Purchase of membership interests
   from noncontrolling interests

 
 
 
 
 
 (129) (129)
Net income attributable to
   noncontrolling interests

 
 
 
 
 
 32
 32
Other
 
 (1) 1
 
 
 
 
Balance at December 31, 2016
 
 3,671
 724
 35
 4,430
 1,245
 5,675
Net income attributable
   to Southern Power

 
 
 1,071
 
 1,071
 
 1,071
Capital contributions from
   parent company

 
 (2) 
 
 (2) 
 (2)
Other comprehensive income
 
 
 
 (10) (10) 
 (10)
Cash dividends on common
   stock

 
 
 (317) 
 (317) 
 (317)
Other comprehensive income
   transfer from SCS (b)

 
 
 
 (27) (27) 
 (27)
Capital contributions from
   noncontrolling interests

 
 
 
 
 
 79
 79
Distributions to noncontrolling
   interests

 
 
 
 
 
 (122) (122)
Net income attributable to
   noncontrolling interests
��
 
 
 
 
 
 44
 44
Reclassification from redeemable
noncontrolling interests

 
 
 
 
 
 114
 114
Other
 
 (7) 
 
 (7) 
 (7)
Balance at December 31, 2017
 $
 $3,662
 $1,478
 $(2) $5,138
 $1,360
 $6,498
(a)Excludes redeemable noncontrolling interests. See Note 10 to the financial statements under "Noncontrolling Interests" for additional information.
(b)In connection with the Company becoming a participant to the Southern Company qualified pension plan and other postretirement benefit plan, $27 million of other comprehensive income, net of tax of $9 million, was transferred from SCS.
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Southern Power Company and Subsidiary Companies 2017 Annual Report




Index to the Notes to Financial Statements



NOTES (continued)
Southern Power Company and Subsidiary Companies 2017 Annual Report

1. SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES
General
Southern Power Company is a wholly-owned subsidiary of Southern Company, which is also the parent company of four traditional electric operating companies, Southern Company Gas (as of July 1, 2016), SCS, and other direct and indirect subsidiaries. The traditional electric operating companies – Alabama Power, Georgia Power, Gulf Power, and Mississippi Power – are vertically integrated utilities providing electric service in four Southeastern states. Southern Power Company and its subsidiaries (the Company) develop, construct, acquire, own, and manage power generation assets, including renewable energy projects, and sell electricity at market-based rates in the wholesale market. Southern Company Gas distributes natural gas through utilities in seven states and is involved in several other complementary businesses including gas marketing services, wholesale gas services, and gas midstream operations. SCS, the system service company, provides, at cost, specialized services to Southern Company and its subsidiary companies.
Effective in December 2017, 538 employees transferred from SCS to the Company. The Company became obligated for related employee costs including pension, other postretirement benefits, and stock-based compensation and has recognized the respective balance sheet assets and liabilities, including AOCI impacts, in its balance sheet at December 31, 2017. Prior to the transfer of employees, the Company's agreements with SCS provided for employee services rendered at amounts in compliance with FERC regulations. The Company adopted the same compensation and benefits plans that SCS has and, therefore, future expenses are not expected to be materially different on a per employee basis.
The preparation of consolidated financial statements in conformity with GAAP requires the use of estimates, and the actual results may differ from those estimates. Certain prior years' data presented in the consolidated financial statements have been reclassified to conform to the current year presentation.
The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of Southern Power Company and its wholly-owned and majority-owned subsidiaries. Intercompany accounts and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation.
Recently Issued Accounting Standards
Revenue
In 2014, the FASB issued ASC 606, Revenue from Contracts with Customers (ASC 606), replacing the existing accounting standard and industry specific guidance for revenue recognition with a five-step model for recognizing and measuring revenue from contracts with customers. The underlying principle of the new standard is to recognize revenue to depict the transfer of goods or services to customers at the amount expected to be collected. The new standard also requires enhanced disclosures regarding the nature, amount, timing, and uncertainty of revenue and the related cash flows arising from contracts with customers.
The Company has completed the evaluation of all revenue streams and determined that the adoption of ASC 606 will not change the current timing or amounts of revenue recognized in the Company's financial statements. Some contractual arrangements, such as certain capacity and energy payments, are excluded from the scope of ASC 606 and included in the scope of the current leasing guidance or the current derivative guidance.
The new standard is effective for reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2017. The Company applied the modified retrospective method of adoption effective January 1, 2018. The Company also utilized practical expedients which allowed it to apply the standard to open contracts at the date of adoption and to reflect the aggregate effect of all modifications when identifying performance obligations and allocating the transaction price for contracts modified before the effective date. The adoption of ASC 606 did not result in a cumulative adjustment.
Leases
In February 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-02, Leases (Topic 842) (ASU 2016-02). ASU 2016-02 requires lessees to recognize on the balance sheet a lease liability and a right-of-use asset for all leases. ASU 2016-02 also changes the recognition, measurement, and presentation of expense associated with leases and provides clarification regarding the identification of certain components of contracts that would represent a lease. The accounting required by lessors is relatively unchanged. ASU 2016-02 is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2018 and the Company will adopt the new standard effective January 1, 2019.
The Company is currently implementing an information technology system along with the related changes to internal controls and accounting policies that will support the accounting for leases under ASU 2016-02. In addition, the Company has substantially completed a detailed inventory and analysis of its leases where the majority relate to land leases for its renewable generation

NOTES (continued)
Southern Power Company and Subsidiary Companies 2017 Annual Report

facilities. While the Company has not yet determined the ultimate impact, adoption of ASU 2016-02 is expected to have a significant impact on the Company's balance sheet for lessee arrangements.
Other
In November 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-18, Statement of Cash Flows (Topic 230): Restricted Cash (ASU 2016-18). ASU 2016-18 eliminates the need to reflect transfers between cash and restricted cash in operating, investing, and financing activities in the statement of cash flows. Upon adoption, the net change in cash and cash equivalents during the period will include amounts generally described as restricted cash or restricted cash equivalents. ASU 2016-18 is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2017, and will be applied retrospectively to each period presented. The Company adopted ASU 2016-18 effective January 1, 2018 with no material impact on its financial statements.
On March 10, 2017, the FASB issued ASU No. 2017-07, Compensation - Retirement Benefits (Topic 715): Improving the Presentation of Net Periodic Pension Cost and Net Periodic Postretirement Benefit Cost (ASU 2017-07). ASU 2017-07 requires that an employer report the service cost component in the same line item or items as other compensation costs and requires the other components of net periodic pension and postretirement benefit costs to be separately presented in other income (expense) in the income statement. Additionally, only the service cost component related to construction labor is eligible for capitalization, when applicable. The Company adopted ASU 2017-07 which is effective for periods beginning after December 15, 2017; however, since the Company became a sponsor of a qualified pension plan and postretirement benefit plan in December 2017, no retrospective presentation of net periodic benefits costs for 2016 or 2017 is required. See Note 2 for additional information.
On August 28, 2017, the FASB issued ASU No. 2017-12, Derivatives and Hedging (Topic 815): Targeted Improvements to Accounting for Hedging Activities (ASU 2017-12), amending the hedge accounting recognition and presentation requirements. ASU 2017-12 makes more financial and non-financial hedging strategies eligible for hedge accounting, amends the related presentation and disclosure requirements, and simplifies hedge effectiveness assessment requirements. ASU 2017-12 is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2018, with early adoption permitted. The Company adopted ASU 2017-12 effective January 1, 2018 with no material impact on its financial statements.
Affiliate Transactions
Total revenues from all PPAs with affiliates, included in wholesale revenue affiliates on the consolidated statements of income, were $233 million, $258 million, and $219 million for the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016, and 2015, respectively. Included within these revenues were affiliate PPAs accounted for as operating leases, which totaled $81 million for the year ended December 31, 2017 and $109 million for each of the years ended December 31, 2016 and 2015.
The Company has an agreement with SCS under which the following services are rendered to the Company at amounts in compliance with FERC regulation: general and design engineering, purchasing, accounting, finance and treasury, tax, information technology, marketing, auditing, insurance and pension administration, human resources, systems and procedures, digital wireless communications, labor, and other services with respect to business and operations, construction management, and transactions associated with the Southern Company system's fleet of generating units. Prior to December 2017, the Company did not have employees and thus all employee-related charges were rendered at amounts in compliance with FERC regulation under agreements with SCS. Costs for all of these services from SCS totaled $218 million, $193 million, and $146 million for the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016, and 2015, respectively. Of these costs, $192 million, $173 million, and $138 million for the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016, and 2015, respectively, were charged to other operations and maintenance expenses; the remainder was primarily capitalized to property, plant, and equipment. Cost allocation methodologies used by SCS prior to the repeal of the Public Utility Holding Company Act of 1935, as amended, were approved by the SEC. Subsequently, additional cost allocation methodologies have been reported to the FERC and management believes they are reasonable. The FERC permits services to be rendered at cost by system service companies.
Total power purchased from affiliates through the power pool, included in purchased power in the consolidated statements of income, totaled $27 million for the year ended December 31, 2017 and $21 million for each of the years ended December 31, 2016 and 2015.
The Company also has several agreements with SCS for transmission services. Transmission services purchased from SCS totaled $13 million for the year ended December 31, 2017 and $11 million for each of the years ended December 31, 2016 and 2015 and were charged to other operations and maintenance in the consolidated statements of income. All charges were billed to the Company based on the Southern Company Open Access Transmission Tariff as filed with the FERC.
Prior to Southern Company's acquisition of Southern Company Gas, SCS, as agent for the Company, had agreements with various subsidiaries of Southern Company Gas to purchase natural gas. Natural gas purchases made by the Company from Southern Company Gas' subsidiaries were $119 million for the year ended December 31, 2017 and $17 million for the period subsequent to

NOTES (continued)
Southern Power Company and Subsidiary Companies 2017 Annual Report

Southern Company's acquisition of Southern Company Gas through December 31, 2016, and are included in fuel expense on the consolidated statements of income.
On September 1, 2016, Southern Company Gas acquired a 50% equity interest in Southern Natural Gas Company, L.L.C. (SNG). Prior to completion of the acquisition, SCS, as agent for the Company, had entered into a long-term interstate natural gas transportation agreement with SNG. The interstate transportation service provided to the Company by SNG pursuant to this agreement is governed by the terms and conditions of SNG's natural gas tariff and is subject to FERC regulation. Transportation costs under this agreement were $25 million for the year ended December 31, 2017 and $7 million for the period subsequent to Southern Company Gas' investment in SNG through December 31, 2016.
The Company and the traditional electric operating companies may jointly enter into various types of wholesale energy, natural gas, and certain other contracts, either directly or through SCS as agent. Each participating company may be jointly and severally liable for the obligations incurred under these agreements. See "Revenues" herein for additional information. The Company and the traditional electric operating companies generally settle amounts related to the above transactions on a monthly basis in the month following the performance of such services or the purchase or sale of electricity.
Acquisition Accounting
The Company may acquire generation assets as part of its overall growth strategy. At the time of an acquisition, the Company will assess if these assets and activities meet the definition of a business. For acquisitions that meet the definition of a business, the Company includes operating results from the date of acquisition in its consolidated financial statements. The purchase price, including any contingent consideration, is allocated based on the fair value of the identifiable assets acquired and liabilities assumed (including any intangible assets). Assets acquired that do not meet the definition of a business are accounted for as an asset acquisition.
The purchase price of each asset acquisition is allocated based on the relative fair value of assets acquired. Determining the fair value of assets acquired and liabilities assumed requires management judgment and the Company may engage independent valuation experts to assist in this process. Fair values are determined by using market participant assumptions, and typically include the timing and amounts of future cash flows, incurred construction costs, the nature of acquired contracts, discount rates, power market prices, and expected asset lives. Any due diligence or transition costs incurred by the Company for potential or successful acquisitions are expensed as incurred.
Contingent consideration primarily relates to fixed amounts due to the seller once the facility is placed in service. For contingent consideration with variable payments, the Company fair values the arrangement with any changes recorded in the consolidated statements of income. See Note 8 for additional fair value information.
Revenues
The Company sells capacity at rates specified under contractual terms for long-term PPAs. These PPAs are generally accounted for as operating leases, non-derivatives, or normal sale derivatives. Capacity revenues from PPAs classified as operating leases are recognized on a straight-line basis over the term of the agreement. Capacity revenues from PPAs classified as non-derivatives or normal sales are recognized at the lesser of the levelized amount or the amount billable under the contract over the respective contract periods. When multiple contracts exist with the same counterparty, the revenues from each contract are accounted for as separate arrangements. All capacity revenues are included in wholesale revenues.
The Company may also enter into contracts to sell short-term capacity in the wholesale electricity markets. These sales are generally classified as mark-to-market derivatives and net unrealized gains (losses) on such contracts are recorded in wholesale revenues. See Note 9 for additional information.
Energy revenues and other contingent revenues are recognized in the period the energy is delivered or the service is rendered. Transmission revenues and other fees are recognized as earned as other operating revenues. See "Financial Instruments" herein for additional information.

NOTES (continued)
Southern Power Company and Subsidiary Companies 2017 Annual Report

Significant portions of the Company's revenues have been derived from certain customers pursuant to PPAs. The following table shows the percentage of total revenues for the Company's top three customers for each of the years presented:
 2017 2016 2015
Georgia Power11.3% 16.5% 15.8%
Duke Energy Corporation6.7% 7.8% 8.2%
Morgan Stanley Capital Group4.5% N/A
 N/A
San Diego Gas & Electric CompanyN/A
 5.7% N/A
Florida Power & Light CompanyN/A
 N/A
 10.7%
Fuel Costs
Fuel costs are expensed as the fuel is used. Fuel costs also include emissions allowances which are expensed as the emissions occur.
Development Costs
The Company capitalizesFor Southern Power, development costs are capitalized once a project is probable of completion, primarily based on a review of its economics and operational feasibility, as well as status of power off-take agreements and regulatory approvals, if applicable. CapitalizedSouthern Power's capitalized development costs are included in construction work in progressCWIP on the consolidated balance sheets. All of Southern Power's development costs incurred prior to the determination that a project is probable of completion are expensed as incurred and included in other operations and maintenance expense in the consolidated statements of income. If it is determined that a project is no longer probable of completion, any of Southern Power's capitalized development costs are expensed and included in other operations and maintenance expense in the consolidated statements of income.
Income and Other TaxesLong-Term Service Agreements
The Company uses the liability method of accounting for deferred income taxes and provides deferred income taxes for all significant income tax temporary differences.
Under current tax regulation, certain projects related to the construction of renewable facilities are eligible for federal ITCs. The Company estimates eligible costs which, as they relate to acquisitions, may not be finalized until the allocation of the purchase price to assets has been finalized. The Company applies the deferred method to ITCs as opposed to the flow-through method. Under the deferred method the ITCs are recorded as a deferred credit and amortized to income tax expense over the life of the respective asset. Furthermore, the tax basis of the asset is reduced by 50% of the ITCs received, resulting in a net deferred tax asset. The Company has elected to recognize the tax benefit of this basis difference as a reduction to income tax expense in the year in which the plant reaches commercial operation. In addition, certain projects are eligible for federal PTCs, which are recorded as an income tax benefit based on KWH production. Federal ITCs and PTCs available to reduce income taxes payable were not fully utilized during 2017 and will be carried forward and utilized in future years. The Company recognizes tax positions that are "more likely than not" of being sustained upon examination by the appropriate taxing authorities. See Note 5 for additional information.
Property, Plant, and Equipment
The Company's depreciable property, plant, and equipment consists primarily of generation assets.
Property, plant, and equipment is stated at original cost or acquired fair value. Original cost includes: materials, direct labor incurred by contractors and affiliatedtraditional electric operating companies and interest capitalized. Interest is capitalizedSouthern Power have entered into LTSAs for the purpose of securing maintenance support for certain of their generating facilities. The LTSAs cover all planned inspections on qualifying projects during the development and construction period. The cost to replace significant items of property defined as retirement units is capitalized. The cost of maintenance, repairs, and replacement of minor items of property is charged to other operations and maintenance expenses as incurred.
When depreciable property, plant, andcovered equipment, is retired, or otherwise disposed of in the normal course of business, the applicable cost and accumulated depreciation is removed and a gain or loss is recognized in the consolidated statements of income.
Depreciation
The Company applies component depreciation, where depreciation is computed principally by the straight-line method over the estimated useful life of the asset. Certain generation assets related to natural gas-fired facilities are depreciated on a units-of-
    Table of Contents                                Index to Financial Statements

COMBINED NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)
Southern Power Company and Subsidiary Companies 20172018 Annual Report

production basis, using hours or starts, to better match outage and maintenance costs to the usage of, and revenues from, these assets.
The primary assets in property, plant, and equipment are generating facilities, which generally have estimated useful lives as follows:
Generating facilityUseful life
Natural gasUp to 45 years
BiomassUp to 40 years
SolarUp to 35 years
WindUp to 30 years
The Company reviews its estimated useful lives and salvage values on an ongoing basis. The results of these reviews could result in changes which could have a material impact on net income in the near term.
Asset Retirement Obligations
Asset retirement obligations (ARO) are computed as the present value of the estimated ultimate costs for an asset's future retirement and are recorded in the period in which the liability is incurred. The costs are capitalized as part of the related long-lived asset and depreciated over the asset's useful life. In the absence of quoted market prices, AROs are estimated using present value techniques in which estimates of future cash outlays associated with the asset retirements are discounted using a credit-adjusted risk-free rate. Estimates of the timing and amounts of future cash outlays are based on projections of when and how the assets will be retired and the cost of future removal activities. The ARO liability primarily relates to the Company's solar and wind facilities, which are located on long-term land leases requiring the restoration of land at the end of the lease. See Note 11 for acquisitions during 2017 and 2016 which contributed to the increased liability.
Details of the AROs included on the consolidated balance sheets are as follows:
 2017  2016 
 (in millions) 
Balance at beginning of year$64
  $21
 
Liabilities incurred6
  42
 
Accretion4
  1
 
Cash flow revisions4
  
 
Balance at end of year$78
  $64
 
Long-Term Service Agreements
The Company has entered into LTSAs for the purpose of securing maintenance support for its natural gas-fired generating facilities. The LTSAs cover all planned inspections on the covered equipment, which generally includes the cost of all labor and materials. The LTSAs also obligate the counterparties to cover the costs of unplanned maintenance on the covered equipment subject to limits and scope specified in each contract.
Payments made under the LTSAs prior tofor the performance of any planned inspections or unplanned capital maintenance are recorded as a prepayment in other current assets and noncurrent assets on the consolidated balance sheets and are recorded as payments pursuant to LTSAs and for equipment not yet received in the statements of cash flows. At the time work is performed, which typically occurs during planned inspections, an appropriate amount is transferred from the prepayment to property, plant, and equipment or charged to expense. The receiptflows as investing activities. Receipts of major parts into materials and supplies inventory prior to planned inspections isare treated as a noncash transaction for purposes oftransactions in the consolidated statements of cash flows.
Impairment of Long-Lived Assets and Intangibles
The Company evaluates long-lived Any payments made prior to the work being performed are recorded as prepayments in other current assets and finite-lived intangiblesnoncurrent assets on the balance sheets. At the time work is performed, an appropriate amount is accrued for impairment when eventsfuture payments or changes in circumstances indicate thattransferred from the carrying value of such assets may not be recoverable. The Company's intangible assets consist primarily of certain PPAs acquired, which are amortized over the term of the PPAs, which have a weighted average term of 19 years. The determination of whether an impairment has occurred is based on an estimate of undiscounted future cash flows attributable to the

NOTES (continued)
Southern Power Companyprepayment and Subsidiary Companies 2017 Annual Report

assets,recorded as compared with the carrying value of the assets. If the estimate of undiscounted future cash flows is less than the carrying value of the asset, the fair value of the asset is determinedproperty, plant, and a loss is recorded.
Amortization expense for acquired PPAs was $25 million, $10 million, and $3 million for the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016, and 2015, respectively, and is recorded in operating revenues. The estimated annual amortization expense is $25 million for each of the next five years.equipment or expensed.
Transmission Receivables/Prepayments
As a result of the Company's growth from theSouthern Power's acquisition and construction of generating facilities, the CompanySouthern Power has transmission receivables and/or prepayments representing the portion of interconnection network and transmission upgrades that will be reimbursed to the Company.Southern Power. Upon completion of the related project, transmission costs are generally reimbursed by the interconnection provider within a five-year period and the receivable/prepayments are reduced as payments or services are received.
Cash and Cash Equivalents
For purposes of the financial statements, temporary cash investments are considered cash equivalents. Temporary cash investments are securities with original maturities of 90 days or less.
Restricted Cash
The Company hasregistrants adopted ASU 2016-18 as of January 1, 2018. See "Recently Adopted Accounting StandardsOther" herein for additional information.
At December 31, 2018, Georgia Power had restricted cash related to the redemption of pollution control revenue bonds, which were redeemed subsequent to December 31, 2018. See Note 8 under "Long-term DebtPollution Control Revenue Bonds" for additional information. At December 31, 2017, Southern Power had restricted cash primarily related to certain acquisitions and construction projects. At December 31, 2018 and 2017, Southern Company Gas had restricted cash held as collateral for worker's compensation, life insurance, and long-term disability insurance.
The aggregate amountfollowing tables provide a reconciliation of cash, cash equivalents, and restricted cash reported within the balance sheets that total to the amounts shown in the statements of cash flows for the registrants that had restricted cash at December 31, 2018 and/or 2017:
 
Southern
Company
Georgia
Power
Southern
Company Gas
 (in millions)
At December 31, 2018   
Cash and cash equivalents$1,396
$4
$64
Cash and cash equivalents classified as assets held for sale9


Restricted cash:





Restricted cash
108

Other accounts and notes receivable114

6
Total cash, cash equivalents, and restricted cash$1,519
$112
$70

COMBINED NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)
Southern Company and Subsidiary Companies 2018 Annual Report

 Southern
Company
Southern
Power
Southern
Company Gas
 (in millions)
At December 31, 2017   
Cash and cash equivalents$2,130
$129
$73
Restricted cash:   
Other accounts and notes receivable5

5
Deferred charges and other assets12
11

Total cash, cash equivalents, and restricted cash$2,147
$140
$78
Storm Damage Reserves
Each traditional electric operating company maintains a reserve to cover or is allowed to defer and recover the cost of damages from major storms to its transmission and distribution lines and, for Mississippi Power, the cost of uninsured damages to its generation facilities and other property. In accordance with their respective state PSC orders, the traditional electric operating companies accrued the following amounts related to storm damage reserves in 2018, 2017, and 2016 was $112016:
 
Southern
Company(*)
Alabama
Power
Georgia
Power
Mississippi
Power
 (in millions)
2018$74
$16
$30
$1
201741
4
30
3
201640
3
30
4
(*)
Includes accruals at Gulf Power of $26.9 million in 2018 and $3.5 million in each of 2017 and 2016. See Note 15 under "Southern Company's Sale of Gulf Power" for information regarding the sale of Gulf Power.
Alabama Power and $13 million, respectively.Mississippi Power also have authority based on orders from their state PSCs to accrue certain additional amounts as circumstances warrant. There were no such additional accruals for Alabama Power and Mississippi Power in any year presented.
CashSee Note 2 under "Alabama PowerRate NDR," "Georgia PowerStorm Damage Recovery," and Cash Equivalents"Mississippi PowerSystem Restoration Rider" for additional information regarding each company's storm damage reserve.
For purposesLeveraged Leases
A subsidiary of Southern Holdings has several leveraged lease agreements, with original terms ranging up to 45 years, which relate to international and domestic energy generation, distribution, and transportation assets. Southern Company receives federal income tax deductions for depreciation and amortization, as well as interest on long-term debt related to these investments. Southern Company reviews all important lease assumptions at least annually, or more frequently if events or changes in circumstances indicate that a change in assumptions has occurred or may occur. These assumptions include the effective tax rate, the residual value, the credit quality of the lessees, and the timing of expected tax cash flows.
The ability of the lessees to make required payments to the Southern Holdings subsidiary is dependent on the operational performance of the assets. In 2017, the financial statements, temporaryand operational performance of one of the lessees and the associated generation assets raised significant concerns about the short-term ability of the generation assets to produce cash investments are consideredflows sufficient to support ongoing operations and the lessee's contractual obligations and its ability to make the remaining semi-annual lease payments to the Southern Holdings subsidiary beginning in June 2018. As a result of operational improvements in 2018, the 2018 lease payments were paid in full. However, operational issues and the resulting cash equivalents. Temporary cash investments are securities with original maturitiesliquidity challenges persist and significant concerns continue regarding the lessee's ability to make the remaining semi-annual lease payments. These operational challenges may also impact the expected residual value of 90 days or less.the assets at the end of the lease term in 2047. If any future lease payment is not paid in full, the Southern Holdings subsidiary may be unable to make its corresponding payment to the holders of the underlying non-recourse debt related to the generation assets. Failure to make the required payment to the debtholders could represent an event of default that would give the debtholders the right to foreclose on, and take ownership of, the generation assets from the Southern Holdings subsidiary, in effect terminating the lease and resulting in the write-off of the related lease receivable, which would result in a reduction in net income of approximately $86 million after tax based on the lease receivable balance at December 31, 2018. Southern Company has evaluated the recoverability of the lease receivable and the expected residual value of

COMBINED NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)
Southern Company and Subsidiary Companies 2018 Annual Report

the generation assets at the end of the lease under various scenarios and has concluded that its investment in the leveraged lease is not impaired at December 31, 2018. Southern Company will continue to monitor the operational performance of the underlying assets and evaluate the ability of the lessee to continue to make the required lease payments. The ultimate outcome of this matter cannot be determined at this time.
Southern Company's net investment in domestic and international leveraged leases consists of the following at December 31:
 2018 2017
 (in millions)
Net rentals receivable$1,563
 $1,498
Unearned income(765) (723)
Investment in leveraged leases798
 775
Deferred taxes from leveraged leases(255) (252)
Net investment in leveraged leases$543
 $523
A summary of the components of income from the leveraged leases follows:
 2018 2017 2016
 (in millions)
Pretax leveraged lease income$25
 $25
 $25
Net impact of Tax Reform Legislation
 48
 
Income tax expense(6) (9) (9)
Net leveraged lease income$19
 $64
 $16
Materials and Supplies
Materials and supplies includefor the traditional electric operating companies generally includes the average cost of transmission, distribution, and generating plant materials. Materials and supplies for Southern Company Gas generally includes propane gas inventory, fleet fuel, and other materials and supplies. Materials and supplies for Southern Power generally includes the average cost of generating plant materials andmaterials.
Materials are recorded asto inventory when purchased and then expensed or capitalized to property, plant, and equipment, as appropriate, at weighted average cost when installed. In addition, certain major parts are recorded as inventory when acquired and then capitalized at cost when installed to property, plant, and equipment.
Fuel Inventory
Fuel inventory for the traditional electric operating companies includes the average cost of coal, natural gas, oil, transportation, and emissions allowances. Fuel inventory for Southern Power, which is included in other current assets, includes the average cost of oil, natural gas, biomass, and emissions allowances. The Company maintains oilFuel is recorded to inventory for use at several natural gas generating units. The Company has contracts in place for natural gas storage to support normal operations of the Company's natural gas generating units. The Company also maintains biomass inventory for use at Plant Nacogdoches. Inventory is maintained using the weighted average cost method. Fuel inventory and emissions allowances are recorded at actual cost when purchased and then expensed, at weighted average cost, as used. Emissions allowances granted by the EPA are included in inventory at zero cost. The traditional electric operating companies recover fuel expense through fuel cost recovery rates approved by each state PSC or, for wholesale rates, the FERC.
Natural Gas for Sale
With the exception of Nicor Gas, the natural gas distribution utilities record natural gas inventories on a WACOG basis. In Georgia's deregulated, competitive environment, Marketers sell natural gas to firm end-use customers at market-based prices. On a monthly basis, Atlanta Gas Light assigns to Marketers the majority of the pipeline storage services that it has under contract, along with a corresponding amount of inventory. Atlanta Gas Light retains and manages a portion of its pipeline storage assets and related natural gas inventories for system balancing and to serve system demand.
Nicor Gas' natural gas inventory is carried at cost on a LIFO basis. Inventory decrements occurring during the year that are restored prior to year end are charged to cost of natural gas at the estimated annual replacement cost. Inventory decrements that are not restored prior to year end are charged to cost of natural gas at the actual LIFO cost of the inventory layers liquidated. The cost of natural gas, including inventory costs, is recovered from customers under a purchased gas recovery mechanism adjusted

COMBINED NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)
Southern Company and Subsidiary Companies 2018 Annual Report

for differences between actual costs and amounts billed; therefore, LIFO liquidations have no impact on Southern Company's or Southern Company Gas' net income. At December 31, 2018, the Nicor Gas LIFO inventory balance was $165 million. Based on the average cost of gas purchased in December 2018, the estimated replacement cost of Nicor Gas' inventory at December 31, 2018 was $409 million. During 2018, Nicor Gas did not liquidate any LIFO-based inventory.
Southern Company Gas' gas marketing services, wholesale gas services, and all other segments record inventory at LOCOM, with cost determined on a WACOG basis. For these segments, Southern Company Gas evaluates the weighted average cost of its natural gas inventories against market prices to determine whether any declines in market prices below the WACOG are other than temporary. For any declines considered to be other than temporary, Southern Company Gas recorded LOCOM adjustments to cost of natural gas to reduce the value of its natural gas inventories to market value. LOCOM adjustments were $10 million during 2018 for wholesale gas services and immaterial for all other periods presented.
Energy Marketing Receivables and Payables
Southern Company Gas' wholesale gas services provides services to retail gas marketers, wholesale gas marketers, utility companies, and industrial customers. These counterparties utilize netting agreements that enable wholesale gas services to net receivables and payables by counterparty upon settlement. Southern Company Gas' wholesale gas services also nets across product lines and against cash collateral, provided the netting and cash collateral agreements include such provisions. While the amounts due from, or owed to, wholesale gas services' counterparties are settled net, they are recorded on a gross basis in the balance sheets as energy marketing receivables and energy marketing payables.
Southern Company Gas' wholesale gas services has trade and credit contracts that contain minimum credit rating requirements. These credit rating requirements typically give counterparties the right to suspend or terminate credit if Southern Company Gas' credit ratings are downgraded to non-investment grade status. Under such circumstances, Southern Company Gas' wholesale gas services would need to post collateral to continue transacting business with some of its counterparties. As of December 31, 2018 and 2017, the required collateral in the event of a credit rating downgrade was $30 million and $8 million, respectively.
Credit policies were established to determine and monitor the creditworthiness of counterparties, including requirements to post collateral or other credit security, as well as the quality of pledged collateral. Collateral or credit security is most often in the form of cash or letters of credit from an investment-grade financial institution, but may also include cash or U.S. government securities held by a trustee. When Southern Company Gas' wholesale gas services is engaged in more than one outstanding derivative transaction with the same counterparty and it also has a legally enforceable netting agreement with that counterparty, the "net" mark-to-market exposure represents the netting of the positive and negative exposures with that counterparty combined with a reasonable measure of Southern Company Gas' credit risk. Southern Company Gas' wholesale gas services also uses other netting agreements with certain counterparties with whom it conducts significant transactions.
See "Concentration of Credit Risk" herein for additional information.
Provision for Uncollectible Accounts
The customers of the traditional electric operating companies and natural gas distribution utilities are billed monthly. For the majority of receivables, a provision for uncollectible accounts is established based on historical collection experience and other factors. For the remaining receivables, if the company is aware of a specific customer's inability to pay, a provision for uncollectible accounts is recorded to reduce the receivable balance to the amount reasonably expected to be collected. If circumstances change, the estimate of the recoverability of accounts receivable could change as well. Circumstances that could affect this estimate include, but are not limited to, customer credit issues, customer deposits, and general economic conditions. Customers' accounts are written off once they are deemed to be uncollectible. For all periods presented, uncollectible accounts averaged less than 1% of revenues for each registrant.
Credit risk exposure at Nicor Gas is mitigated by a bad debt rider approved by the Illinois Commission. The bad debt rider provides for the recovery from (or refund to) customers of the difference between Nicor Gas' actual bad debt experience on an annual basis and the benchmark bad debt expense used to establish its base rates for the respective year.
Concentration of Credit Risk
Southern Company Gas' wholesale gas services business has a concentration of credit risk for services it provides to its counterparties. This credit risk is generally concentrated in 20 of its counterparties and is measured by 30-day receivable exposure plus forward exposure. Counterparty credit risk is evaluated using a S&P equivalent credit rating, which is determined by a process of converting the lower of the S&P or Moody's rating to an internal rating ranging from 9 to 1, with 9 being equivalent to AAA/Aaa by S&P and Moody's, respectively, and 1 being equivalent to D/Default by S&P and Moody's, respectively. A counterparty that does not have an external rating is assigned an internal rating based on the strength of its financial ratios. As of

COMBINED NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)
Southern Company and Subsidiary Companies 2018 Annual Report

December 31, 2018, the top 20 counterparties represented 48%, or $298 million, of the total counterparty exposure and had a weighted average S&P equivalent rating of A-.
Concentration of credit risk occurs at Atlanta Gas Light for amounts billed for services and other costs to its customers, which consist of 15 Marketers in Georgia (including SouthStar). The credit risk exposure to Marketers varies seasonally, with the lowest exposure in the non-peak summer months and the highest exposure in the peak winter months. Marketers are responsible for the retail sale of natural gas to end-use customers in Georgia. The functions of the retail sale of gas include the purchase and sale of natural gas, customer service, billings, and collections. The provisions of Atlanta Gas Light's tariff allow Atlanta Gas Light to obtain credit security support in an amount equal to a minimum of two times a Marketer's highest month's estimated bill from Atlanta Gas Light.
Financial Instruments
The Company usestraditional electric operating companies and Southern Power use derivative financial instruments to limit exposure to fluctuations in interest rates, the prices of certain fuel purchases, electricity purchases and sales, and occasionally foreign currency exchange rates. Southern Company Gas uses derivative financial instruments to limit exposure to fluctuations in natural gas prices, weather, interest rates, and commodity prices. All derivative financial instruments are recognized as either assets or liabilities on the consolidated balance sheets (included in "Other" or shown separately as "Risk Management Activities") and are measured at fair value. See Note 813 for additional information regarding fair value. Substantially all of the Company'straditional electric operating companies' and Southern Power's bulk energy purchases and sales contracts that meet the definition of a derivative are excluded from fair value accounting requirements because they qualify for the "normal" scope exception, and are accounted for under the accrual method. Derivative contracts that qualify as cash flow hedges of anticipated transactions or are recoverable through the traditional electric operating companies' and the natural gas distribution utilities' fuel-hedging programs result in the deferral of related gains and losses in AOCI or regulatory assets and liabilities, respectively, until the hedged transactions occur. AnyFor 2017 and 2016, ineffectiveness arising from cash flow hedges iswas recognized currently in net income. Upon the adoption of ASU 2017-12 in 2018, ineffectiveness is no longer separately measured and recorded in earnings. See "Recently Adopted Accounting Standards" herein for additional information. Other derivative contracts that qualify as fair value hedges are marked to market through current period income and are recorded on a net basis in the financial statement line item where they will eventually settle.statements of income. Cash flows from derivatives are classified on the statementstatements of cash flows in the same category as the hedged item. See Note 914 for additional information regarding derivatives.
The Company offsets theregistrants offset fair value amounts recognized for multiple derivative instruments executed with the same counterparty under a netting arrangement. Additionally, the Companyarrangements. The registrants had no outstanding collateral repayment obligations or rights to reclaim collateral arising from derivative instruments recognized at December 31, 2017 or 2016.2018.
The Company isregistrants are exposed to potential losses related to financial instruments in the event of counterparties' nonperformance. The Company hasregistrants have established risk management policies and controls to determine and monitor the creditworthiness of counterparties in order to mitigate the Company'stheir exposure to counterparty credit risk.
Southern Company Gas
Southern Company Gas enters into weather derivative contracts as economic hedges of natural gas revenues in the event of warmer-than-normal weather in the Heating Season. Exchange-traded options are carried at fair value, with changes reflected in natural gas revenues. Non-exchange-traded options are accounted for using the intrinsic value method. Changes in the intrinsic value for non-exchange-traded contracts are also reflected in natural gas revenues in the statements of income.
Wholesale gas services purchases natural gas for storage when the current market price paid to buy and transport natural gas plus the cost to store and finance the natural gas is less than the market price that can be received in the future, resulting in positive net natural gas revenues. NYMEX futures and OTC contracts are used to sell natural gas at that future price to substantially protect the natural gas revenues that will ultimately be realized when the stored natural gas is sold. Southern Company Gas enters into transactions to secure transportation capacity between delivery points in order to serve its customers and various markets. NYMEX futures and OTC contracts are used to capture the price differential or spread between the locations served by the capacity in order to substantially protect the natural gas revenues that will ultimately be realized when the physical flow of natural gas between delivery points occurs. These contracts generally meet the definition of derivatives and are carried at fair value on the balance sheets, with changes in fair value recorded in natural gas revenues on the statements of income in the period of change. These contracts are not designated as hedges for accounting purposes.
The purchase, transportation, storage, and sale of natural gas are accounted for on a weighted average cost or accrual basis, as appropriate, rather than on the fair value basis utilized for the derivatives used to mitigate the natural gas price risk associated with the storage and transportation portfolio. Monthly demand charges are incurred for the contracted storage and transportation
    Table of Contents                                Index to Financial Statements

COMBINED NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)
Southern Power Company and Subsidiary Companies 20172018 Annual Report

capacity and payments associated with asset management agreements, and these demand charges and payments are recognized on the statements of income in the period they are incurred. This difference in accounting methods can result in volatility in reported earnings, even though the economic margin is substantially unchanged from the dates the transactions were consummated.
Comprehensive Income
The objective of comprehensive income is to report a measure of all changes in common stock equity of an enterprise that result from transactions and other economic events of the period other than transactions with owners. Comprehensive income consists of net income attributable to the registrant, changes in the fair value of qualifying cash flow hedges, and reclassifications for amounts included in net income. Comprehensive income also consists of certain changes in pension and other postretirement benefit plans for Southern Company, Southern Power, and reclassifications of amounts included in net income.Southern Company Gas.
Accumulated OCIAOCI (loss) balances, net of tax effects, for Southern Company, Southern Power, and Southern Company Gas were as follows:
Qualifying HedgesPension and Other Postretirement Benefit PlansAccumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss)
Qualifying
Hedges
 
Pension and Other
Postretirement
Benefit Plans
 
Accumulated Other
Comprehensive
Income (Loss)
(in millions)(in millions)
Balance at December 31, 2016$35
$
$35
Southern Company     
Balance at December 31, 2017$(119) $(70) $(189)
Adjustment to beginning balance(*)
(26) (14) (40)
Current period change(10)
(10)24
 2
 26
Other comprehensive income transfer from SCS(*)

(27)(27)
Balance at December 31, 2018$(121) $(82) $(203)
     
Southern Power     
Balance at December 31, 2017$25
$(27)$(2)$25
 $(27) $(2)
Adjustment to beginning balance(*)
4
 
 4
Current period change7
 7
 14
Balance at December 31, 2018$36
 $(20) $16
     
Southern Company Gas     
Balance at December 31, 2017$(6) $26
 $20
Adjustment to beginning balance(*)
(1) 5
 4
Current period change4
 (2) 2
Balance at December 31, 2018$(3) $29
 $26
(*)In connection with
Reflects the Company becoming a participantreclassification related to stranded tax effects resulting from the Southern Company qualified pension plan and other postretirement benefit plan, $27 million of OCI, net of tax of $9 million, was transferred from SCS.Tax Reform Legislation as allowed by ASU 2018-02. See "Recently Adopted Accounting StandardsOther" herein for additional information.
Variable Interest Entities
The primary beneficiary of a variable interest entity (VIE)VIE is required to consolidate the VIE when it has both the power to direct the activities of the VIE that most significantly impact the VIE's economic performance and the obligation to absorb losses or the right to receive benefits from the VIE that could potentially be significant to the VIE. See Note 7 for additional information regarding VIEs.
Alabama Power has established a wholly-owned trust to issue preferred securities. See Note 8 under "Long-term DebtOther Long-Term DebtAlabama Power" for additional information. However, Alabama Power is not considered the primary beneficiary of the trust. Therefore, the investment in the trust is reflected as other investments, and the related loan from the trust is reflected as long-term debt in Alabama Power's balance sheets.

COMBINED NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)
Southern Company and Subsidiary Companies 2018 Annual Report

2. REGULATORY MATTERS
Southern Company
Regulatory Assets and Liabilities
Regulatory assets and (liabilities) reflected in the consolidated balance sheets of Southern Company at December 31, 2018 and 2017 relate to:
 2018 2017 Note
 (in millions)  
Retiree benefit plans$3,658
 $3,931
 (a,p)
Asset retirement obligations-asset2,933
 1,133
 (b,p)
Deferred income tax charges799
 814
 (b,o)
Property damage reserves-asset416
 333
 (c)
Under recovered regulatory clause revenues407
 317
 (d)
Environmental remediation-asset366
 511
 (e,p)
Loss on reacquired debt346
 223
 (f)
Remaining net book value of retired assets211
 306
 (g)
Vacation pay182
 183
 (h,p)
Long-term debt fair value adjustment121
 138
 (i)
Deferred PPA charges
 119
 (j,p)
Other regulatory assets581
 625
 (k)
Deferred income tax credits(6,455) (7,261) (b,o)
Other cost of removal obligations(2,297) (2,684) (b)
Customer refunds(293) (188) (n)
Property damage reserves-liability(76) (135) (l)
Over recovered regulatory clause revenues(47) (155) (d)
Other regulatory liabilities(132) (104) (m)
Total regulatory assets (liabilities), net$720
 $(1,894)  
Note: Unless otherwise noted, the recovery and amortization periods for these regulatory assets and (liabilities) are approved by the respective PSC or regulatory agency and are as follows:
(a)Recovered and amortized over the average remaining service period which may range up to 15 years. See Note 11 for additional information.
(b)Asset retirement and other cost of removal obligations are recorded, deferred income tax assets are recovered, and deferred income tax liabilities are amortized over the related property lives, which may range up to 80 years. Asset retirement and removal liabilities will be settled and trued up following completion of the related activities. Included in the deferred income tax assets is $28 million for the retiree Medicare drug subsidy, which is being recovered and amortized through 2027.
(c)
Through 2019, Georgia Power is recovering approximately $30 million annually for storm damage, which is expected to be adjusted in the Georgia Power 2019 Base Rate Case. See "Georgia PowerStorm Damage Recovery" herein for additional information.
(d)Recorded and recovered or amortized over periods generally not exceeding 10 years.
(e)Recovered through environmental cost recovery mechanisms when the remediation is performed or the work is performed.
(f)Recovered over either the remaining life of the original issue or, if refinanced, over the remaining life of the new issue, which may range up to 50 years.
(g)Amortized over periods not exceeding eight years.
(h)Recorded as earned by employees and recovered as paid, generally within one year. This includes both vacation and banked holiday pay.
(i)
Recovered over the remaining life of the original debt issuances, which range up to 20 years. For additional information see Note 15 under "Southern Company Merger with Southern Company Gas."
(j)
Related to Gulf Power and reclassified as assets held for sale at December 31, 2018. See Note 15 under "Southern Company's Sale of Gulf Power" for information regarding the sale of Gulf Power.
(k)Comprised of numerous immaterial components including nuclear outage, fuel-hedging losses, cancelled construction projects, building and generating plant leases, property tax, and other miscellaneous assets. These costs are recorded and recovered or amortized over periods generally not exceeding 50 years.
(l)Amortized as storm restoration and potential reliability-related expenses are incurred.
(m)Comprised of numerous components including retiree benefit plans, fuel-hedging gains, AROs, and other liabilities that are recorded and recovered or amortized over periods not exceeding 20 years.
(n)
At December 31, 2018, represents amounts accrued and outstanding for refund, including approximately $109 million as a result of Alabama Power's 2018 retail return exceeding the allowed range, approximately $55 million pursuant to the Georgia Power Tax Reform Settlement Agreement, and approximately $100 million, subject to review and approval by the Georgia PSC, as a result of Georgia Power's 2018 retail ROE exceeding the allowed retail ROE range. See "Alabama Power – Rate RSE" and "Georgia PowerRate Plans" herein for additional information.
(o)As a result of the Tax Reform Legislation, these accounts include certain deferred income tax assets and liabilities not subject to normalization. The recovery and amortization of these amounts will be determined in future rate proceedings. See "Georgia Power," "Mississippi Power," and "Southern Company Gas" herein and Note 10 for additional information.
(p)Not earning a return as offset in rate base by a corresponding asset or liability.

COMBINED NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)
Southern Company and Subsidiary Companies 2018 Annual Report

Gulf Power
On January 1, 2019, Southern Company completed its sale of Gulf Power to NextEra Energy. See Note 15 under "Southern Company's Sale of Gulf Power" for additional information.
In accordance with a Florida PSC-approved settlement agreement, Gulf Power's rates effective for the first billing cycle in July 2017 increased by approximately $54 million annually (2017 Gulf Power Rate Case Settlement), including a $62 million increase in base revenues, less an $8 million purchased power capacity cost recovery clause credit. The 2017 Rate Case Settlement Agreement also resulted in a $32.5 million write-down of Gulf Power's ownership of Plant Scherer Unit 3, which was recorded in the first quarter 2017.
As a continuation of the 2017 Gulf Power Rate Case Settlement Agreement, on March 26, 2018, the Florida PSC approved a stipulation and settlement agreement addressing Gulf Power's retail revenue requirement effects of the Tax Reform Legislation (Gulf Power Tax Reform Settlement Agreement). Beginning in April 1, 2018, the Gulf Power Tax Reform Settlement Agreement resulted in annual reductions of approximately $18 million to Gulf Power's base rates and approximately $16 million to Gulf Power's environmental cost recovery rates and a one-time refund of approximately $69 million for the retail portion of unprotected (not subject to normalization) deferred tax liabilities, which was credited to customers through Gulf Power's fuel cost recovery rates over the remainder of 2018.

COMBINED NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)
Southern Company and Subsidiary Companies 2018 Annual Report

Alabama Power
Regulatory Assets and Liabilities
Regulatory assets and (liabilities) reflected in the balance sheets of Alabama Power at December 31, 2018 and 2017 relate to:
 2018 2017 Note
 (in millions)  
Retiree benefit plans$947
 $946
 (a,p)
Deferred income tax charges241
 240
 (b,c,d,)
Under recovered regulatory clause revenues176
 53
 (e)
Asset retirement obligations147
 (33) (b)
Regulatory clauses142
 142
 (f)
Vacation pay71
 70
 (g,p)
Loss on reacquired debt56
 62
 (h)
Nuclear outage49
 56
 (i)
Remaining net book value of retired assets43
 54
 (j)
Other regulatory assets57
 58
 (k,l)
Deferred income tax credits(2,027) (2,082) (b,d)
Other cost of removal obligations(497) (609) (b)
Rate RSE refund(109) 
 (m)
Natural disaster reserve(20) (38) (n)
Other regulatory liabilities(45) (7) (l,o)
Total regulatory assets (liabilities), net$(769) $(1,088)  
Note: Unless otherwise noted, the recovery and amortization periods for these regulatory assets and (liabilities) have been accepted or approved by the Alabama PSC and are as follows:
(a)Recovered and amortized over the average remaining service period which may range up to 15 years. See Note 11 for additional information.
(b)Asset retirement and removal assets and liabilities are recorded, deferred income tax assets are recovered, and deferred income tax credits are amortized over the related property lives, which may range up to 50 years. Asset retirement and other cost of removal assets and liabilities will be settled and trued up following completion of the related activities.
(c)Included in the deferred income tax charges are $10 million for 2018 and $13 million for 2017 for the retiree Medicare drug subsidy, which is being recovered and amortized through 2027.
(d)As a result of the Tax Reform Legislation, these accounts include certain deferred income tax assets and liabilities not subject to normalization. The recovery and amortization of these amounts will occur ratably over the related property lives, which may range up to 50 years. See Note 10 for additional information.
(e)
Recorded and recovered or amortized over periods not exceeding 10 years. See "Rate CNP PPA," "Rate CNP Compliance," and" Rate ECR" herein for additional information.
(f)
Will be amortized concurrently with the effective date of Alabama Power's next depreciation study. See "Rate RSE" herein for additional information.
(g)Recorded as earned by employees and recovered as paid, generally within one year. This includes both vacation and banked holiday pay.
(h)Recovered over the remaining life of the original issue, which may range up to 50 years.
(i)Nuclear outage costs are deferred to a regulatory asset when incurred and amortized over a subsequent 18-month period.
(j)Recorded and amortized over remaining periods up to 8 years.
(k)Comprised of components including generation site selection/evaluation costs, PPA capacity (to be recovered over the next 12 months), and other miscellaneous assets. Capitalized upon initialization of related construction projects, if applicable.
(l)Fuel-hedging assets and liabilities are recorded over the life of the underlying hedged purchase contracts, which generally do not exceed three and a half years. Upon final settlement, actual costs incurred are recovered through the energy cost recovery clause.
(m)
Refund accrued as a result of the 2018 retail return exceeding the allowed range. See "Rate RSE" herein for additional information.
(n)Amortized as storm restoration and potential reliability-related expenses are incurred.
(o)Comprised of several components, primarily $33 million deferred as a result of the Alabama PSC accounting order regarding the Tax Reform Legislation. See "Tax Reform Accounting Order" herein for additional information.
(p)Not earning a return as offset in rate base by a corresponding asset or liability.

COMBINED NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)
Southern Company and Subsidiary Companies 2018 Annual Report

Rate RSE
The Alabama PSC has adopted Rate RSE that provides for periodic annual adjustments based upon Alabama Power's projected weighted common equity return (WCER) compared to an allowable range. Rate RSE adjustments are based on forward-looking information for the applicable upcoming calendar year. Rate RSE adjustments for any two-year period, when averaged together, cannot exceed 4.0% and any annual adjustment is limited to 5.0%. When the projected WCER is under the allowed range, there is an adjusting point of 5.98% and eligibility for a performance-based adder of seven basis points, or 0.07%, to the WCER adjusting point if Alabama Power (i) has an "A" credit rating equivalent with at least one of the recognized rating agencies or (ii) is in the top one-third of a designated customer value benchmark survey. If Alabama Power's actual retail return is above the allowed WCER range, the excess will be refunded to customers unless otherwise directed by the Alabama PSC; however, there is no provision for additional customer billings should the actual retail return fall below the WCER range. Prior to January 2019, retail rates remained unchanged when the WCER range was between 5.75% and 6.21%.
At December 31, 2016, Alabama Power's retail return exceeded the allowed WCER range which resulted in Alabama Power establishing a $73 million Rate RSE refund liability. In accordance with an Alabama PSC order issued in February 2017, Alabama Power applied the full amount of the refund to reduce the under recovered balance of Rate CNP PPA as discussed further below.
Effective in January 2017, Rate RSE increased 4.48%, or $245 million annually. At December 31, 2017, Alabama Power's actual retail return was within the allowed WCER range. Retail rates under Rate RSE were unchanged for 2018.
In conjunction with Rate RSE, Alabama Power has an established retail tariff that provides for an adjustment to customer billings to recognize the impact of a change in the statutory income tax rate. In accordance with this tariff, Alabama Power returned $267 million to retail customers through bill credits during 2018 as a result of the change in the federal income tax rate under the Tax Reform Legislation.
On May 1, 2018, the Alabama PSC approved modifications to Rate RSE and other commitments designed to position Alabama Power to address the growing pressure on its credit quality resulting from the Tax Reform Legislation, without increasing retail rates under Rate RSE in the near term. Alabama Power plans to reduce growth in total debt by increasing equity, with corresponding reductions in debt issuances, thereby de-leveraging its capital structure. Alabama Power's goal is to achieve an equity ratio of approximately 55% by the end of 2025. At December 31, 2018, Alabama Power's equity ratio was approximately 47%.
The approved modifications to Rate RSE began for billings in January 2019. The modifications include reducing the top of the allowed WCER range from 6.21% to 6.15% and modifications to the refund mechanism applicable to prior year actual results. The modifications to the refund mechanism allow Alabama Power to retain a portion of the revenue that causes the actual WCER for a given year to exceed the allowed range.
Generally, if Alabama Power's actual WCER is between 6.15% and 7.65%, customers will receive 25% of the amount between 6.15% and 6.65%, 40% of the amount between 6.65% and 7.15%, and 75% of the amount between 7.15% and 7.65%. Customers will receive all amounts in excess of an actual WCER of 7.65%.
In conjunction with these modifications to Rate RSE, on May 8, 2018, Alabama Power consented to a moratorium on any upward adjustments under Rate RSE for 2019 and 2020 and will also return $50 million to customers through bill credits in 2019.
On November 30, 2018, Alabama Power made its required annual Rate RSE submission to the Alabama PSC of projected data for calendar year 2019. Projected earnings were within the specified range; therefore, retail rates under Rate RSE remain unchanged for 2019.
At December 31, 2018, Alabama Power's retail return exceeded the allowed WCER range, which resulted in Alabama Power establishing a regulatory liability of $109 million for Rate RSE refunds. In accordance with an Alabama PSC order issued on February 5, 2019, Alabama Power will apply $75 million to reduce the Rate ECR under recovered balance and the remaining $34 million will be refunded to customers through bill credits in July through September 2019.
Rate CNP PPA
Alabama Power's retail rates, approved by the Alabama PSC, provide for adjustments under Rate CNP to recognize the placing of new generating facilities into retail service. Alabama Power may also recover retail costs associated with certificated PPAs under Rate CNP PPA. No adjustments to Rate CNP PPA occurred during the period 2016 through 2018 and no adjustment is expected in 2019. At December 31, 2018 and 2017, Alabama Power had an under recovered Rate CNP PPA balance of $25 million and $12 million, respectively, which is included in deferred under recovered regulatory clause revenues in the balance sheet.
In accordance with an accounting order issued in February 2017 by the Alabama PSC, Alabama Power eliminated the under recovered balance in Rate CNP PPA at December 31, 2016, which totaled approximately $142 million. As discussed herein under

COMBINED NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)
Southern Company and Subsidiary Companies 2018 Annual Report

"Rate RSE," Alabama Power utilized the full amount of its $73 million Rate RSE refund liability to reduce the amount of the Rate CNP PPA under recovery and reclassified the remaining $69 million to a separate regulatory asset. The amortization of the new regulatory asset through Rate RSE will begin concurrently with the effective date of Alabama Power's next depreciation study, which is expected to occur no later than 2022. Alabama Power's current depreciation study became effective January 1, 2017.
Rate CNP Compliance
Rate CNP Compliance allows for the recovery of Alabama Power's retail costs associated with laws, regulations, and other such mandates directed at the utility industry involving the environment, security, reliability, safety, sustainability, or similar considerations impacting Alabama Power's facilities or operations. Rate CNP Compliance is based on forward-looking information and provides for the recovery of these costs pursuant to a factor that is calculated annually. Compliance costs to be recovered include operations and maintenance expenses, depreciation, and a return on certain invested capital. Revenues for Rate CNP Compliance, as recorded on the financial statements, are adjusted for differences in actual recoverable costs and amounts billed in current regulated rates. Accordingly, changes in the billing factor will have no significant effect on Southern Company's or Alabama Power's revenues or net income, but will affect annual cash flow. Changes in Rate CNP Compliance-related operations and maintenance expenses and depreciation generally will have no effect on Southern Company's or Alabama Power's net income.
In accordance with an accounting order issued in February 2017 by the Alabama PSC, Alabama Power reclassified $36 million of its under recovered balance in Rate CNP Compliance to a separate regulatory asset. The amortization of the new regulatory asset through Rate RSE will begin concurrently with the effective date of Alabama Power's next depreciation study, which is expected to occur no later than 2022. Alabama Power's current depreciation study became effective January 1, 2017.
In December 2017, the Alabama PSC issued a consent order that Alabama Power leave in effect for 2018 the factors associated with Alabama Power's compliance costs for the year 2017, with any under-collected amount for prior years deemed recovered before any current year amounts.
On November 30, 2018, Alabama Power submitted calculations associated with its cost of complying with environmental mandates, as provided under Rate CNP Compliance. The filing reflected a projected unrecovered retail revenue requirement for environmental compliance of approximately $205 million, which is being recovered in the billing months of January 2019 through December 2019.
At December 31, 2018, Alabama Power had an under recovered Rate CNP Compliance balance of $42 million, which is included in customer accounts receivable, and $17 million at December 31, 2017 included in deferred under recovered regulatory clause revenues in the balance sheet.
Rate ECR
Alabama Power has established energy cost recovery rates under Alabama Power's Rate ECR as approved by the Alabama PSC. Rates are based on an estimate of future energy costs and the current over or under recovered balance. Revenues recognized under Rate ECR and recorded on the financial statements are adjusted for the difference in actual recoverable fuel costs and amounts billed in current regulated rates. The difference in the recoverable fuel costs and amounts billed give rise to the over or under recovered amounts recorded as regulatory assets or liabilities. Alabama Power, along with the Alabama PSC, continually monitors the over or under recovered cost balance to determine whether an adjustment to billing rates is required. Changes in the Rate ECR factor have no significant effect on Southern Company's or Alabama Power's net income, but will impact operating cash flows.
In accordance with an accounting order issued in February 2017 by the Alabama PSC, Alabama Power reclassified $36 million of its under recovered balance in Rate ECR to a separate regulatory asset. The amortization of the new regulatory asset through Rate RSE will begin concurrently with the effective date of Alabama Power's next depreciation study, which is expected to occur no later than 2022. Alabama Power's current depreciation study became effective January 1, 2017.
In December 2017, the Alabama PSC issued a consent order that Alabama Power leave in effect for 2018 the energy cost recovery rates which began in 2017.
On May 1, 2018, the Alabama PSC approved an increase to Rate ECR from 2.015 cents per KWH to 2.353 cents per KWH effective July 2018 through December 2018. On December 4, 2018, the Alabama PSC issued a consent order to leave this rate in effect through December 31, 2019. This change is expected to increase collections by approximately $183 million in 2019. Absent any further order from the Alabama PSC, in January 2020, the rates will return to the originally authorized 5.910 cents per KWH.
As discussed herein under "Rate RSE," in accordance with an Alabama PSC order issued on February 5, 2019, Alabama Power will utilize $75 million of the 2018 Rate RSE refund liability to reduce the Rate ECR under recovered balance.

COMBINED NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)
Southern Company and Subsidiary Companies 2018 Annual Report

At December 31, 2018, Alabama Power's under recovered fuel costs totaled $109 million, of which $18 million is included in customer accounts receivable and $91 million is included in deferred under recovered regulatory clause revenues on Southern Company's and Alabama Power's balance sheets. At December 31, 2017, Alabama Power had an under recovered fuel balance of $25 million, which was included in deferred under recovered regulatory clause revenues on Southern Company's and Alabama Power's balance sheets. These classifications are based on estimates, which include such factors as weather, generation availability, energy demand, and the price of energy. A change in any of these factors could have a material impact on the timing of any recovery or return of fuel costs.
Tax Reform Accounting Order
On May 1, 2018, the Alabama PSC approved an accounting order that authorized Alabama Power to defer the benefits of federal excess deferred income taxes associated with the Tax Reform Legislation for the year ended December 31, 2018 as a regulatory liability and to use up to $30 million of such deferrals to offset under recovered amounts under Rate ECR. The estimated deferrals for the year ended December 31, 2018 totaled approximately $63 million, subject to adjustment following the filing of the 2018 tax return, of which $30 million was used to offset the Rate ECR under recovered balance and $33 million is recorded in other regulatory liabilities, deferred on the balance sheet to be used for the benefit of customers as determined by the Alabama PSC at a future date. See Note 10 under "Current and Deferred Income Taxes" for additional information.
Software Accounting Order
On February 5, 2019, the Alabama PSC approved an accounting order that authorizes Alabama Power to establish a regulatory asset for operations and maintenance costs associated with software implementation projects. The regulatory asset will be amortized ratably over the life of the related software.
Rate NDR
Based on an order from the Alabama PSC, Alabama Power maintains a reserve for operations and maintenance expenses to cover the cost of damages from major storms to its transmission and distribution facilities. The order approves a separate monthly Rate NDR charge to customers consisting of two components. The first component is intended to establish and maintain a reserve balance for future storms and is an on-going part of customer billing. When the reserve balance falls below $50 million, a reserve establishment charge will be activated (and the on-going reserve maintenance charge concurrently suspended) until the reserve balance reaches $75 million. In December 2017, the reserve maintenance charge was suspended and the reserve establishment charge was activated as a result of the NDR balance falling below $50 million. Alabama Power expects to collect approximately $16 million annually until the reserve balance is restored to $75 million. The NDR balance at December 31, 2018 was $20 million and is included in other regulatory liabilities, deferred on the balance sheet.
The second component of the Rate NDR charge is intended to allow recovery of any existing deferred storm-related operations and maintenance costs and any future reserve deficits over a 24-month period. The Alabama PSC order gives Alabama Power authority to record a deficit balance in the NDR when costs of storm damage exceed any established reserve balance. Absent further Alabama PSC approval, the maximum total Rate NDR charge consisting of both components is $10 per month per non-residential customer account and $5 per month per residential customer account. Alabama Power has the authority, based on an order from the Alabama PSC, to accrue certain additional amounts as circumstances warrant. The order allows for reliability-related expenditures to be charged against the additional accruals when the NDR balance exceeds $75 million. Alabama Power may designate a portion of the NDR to reliability-related expenditures as a part of an annual budget process for the following year or during the current year for identified unbudgeted reliability-related expenditures that are incurred. Accruals that have not been designated can be used to offset storm charges. Additional accruals to the NDR will enhance Alabama Power's ability to deal with the financial effects of future natural disasters, promote system reliability, and offset costs retail customers would otherwise bear. No such accruals were recorded or designated in any period presented.
As revenue from the Rate NDR charge is recognized, an equal amount of operations and maintenance expenses related to the NDR will also be recognized. As a result, the Rate NDR charge will not have an effect on net income but will impact operating cash flows.
Environmental Accounting Order
Based on an order from the Alabama PSC (Environmental Accounting Order), Alabama Power is allowed to establish a regulatory asset to record the unrecovered investment costs, including the unrecovered plant asset balance and the unrecovered costs associated with site removal and closure associated with future unit retirements caused by environmental regulations. The regulatory asset is being amortized and recovered over the affected unit's remaining useful life, as established prior to the decision regarding early retirement through Rate CNP Compliance. At December 31, 2018, this regulatory asset had a balance of $42

COMBINED NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)
Southern Company and Subsidiary Companies 2018 Annual Report

million, of which $10 million is included in other regulatory assets, current and $32 million is included in other regulatory assets, deferred on the balance sheet.
Subsequent to December 31, 2018, Alabama Power determined that Plant Gorgas Units 8, 9, and 10 (approximately 1,000 MWs) will be retired by April 15, 2019 due to the expected costs of compliance with federal and state environmental regulations. In accordance with the Environmental Accounting Order, approximately $740 million of net investment costs will be transferred to a regulatory asset at the retirement date and recovered over the affected units' remaining useful lives, as established prior to the decision to retire.

COMBINED NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)
Southern Company and Subsidiary Companies 2018 Annual Report

Georgia Power
Regulatory Assets and Liabilities
Regulatory assets and (liabilities) reflected in the balance sheets of Georgia Power at December 31, 2018 and 2017 relate to:
 2018 2017 Note
 (in millions)  
Retiree benefit plans$1,295
 $1,313
 (a, l)
Asset retirement obligations2,644
 945
 (b, l)
Deferred income tax charges522
 521
 (b, c, l)
Storm damage reserves416
 333
 (d)
Remaining net book value of retired assets127
 146
 (e)
Loss on reacquired debt277
 127
 (f, l)
Vacation pay91
 91
 (g, l)
Other cost of removal obligations68
 40
 (b)
Environmental remediation55
 49
 (h)
Other regulatory assets135
 106
 (i)
Deferred income tax credits(3,080) (3,248) (b, c)
Customer refunds(165) (188) (j)
Other regulatory liabilities(7) (3) (k, l)
Total regulatory assets (liabilities), net$2,378
 $232
  
Note: Unless otherwise noted, the recovery and amortization periods for these regulatory assets and (liabilities) are approved by the Georgia PSC and are as follows:
(a)Recovered and amortized over the average remaining service period which may range up to 14 years. See Note 11 for additional information.
(b)Through 2019, Georgia Power is recovering approximately $60 million annually for AROs, which is expected to be adjusted in the Georgia Power 2019 Base Rate Case. Asset retirement and removal liabilities will be settled and trued up following completion of the related activities. See Note 6 for additional information on AROs. Other cost of removal obligations and deferred income tax assets are recovered and deferred income tax liabilities are amortized over the related property lives, which may range up to 65 years. Included in the deferred income tax assets is $17 million for the retiree Medicare drug subsidy, which is being recovered and amortized through 2022.
(c)
As a result of the Tax Reform Legislation, these balances include $145 million of deferred income tax assets related to CWIP for Plant Vogtle Units 3 and 4 and approximately $610 million of deferred income tax liabilities, neither of which are subject to normalization. The recovery and amortization of these amounts is expected to be determined in the Georgia Power 2019 Base Rate Case. See "Rate Plans" herein and Note 10 for additional information.
(d)
Through 2019, Georgia Power is recovering approximately $30 million annually for storm damage, which is expected to be adjusted in the Georgia Power 2019 Base Rate Case. See "Storm Damage Recovery" herein and Note 1 under "Storm Damage Reserves" for additional information.
(e)
The net book value of Plant Branch Units 1 through 4 at December 31, 2018 was $87 million, which is being amortized over the units' remaining useful lives through 2024. The net book value of Plant Mitchell Unit 3 at December 31, 2018 was $9 million, which will continue to be amortized through December 31, 2019 as provided in the 2013 ARP. Amortization of the remaining approximately $4 million net book value of Plant Mitchell Unit 3 at December 31, 2019 and a total of approximately $31 million related to obsolete inventories of certain retired units is expected to be determined in the Georgia Power 2019 Base Rate Case. See "Integrated Resource Plan" herein for additional information.
(f)Recovered over either the remaining life of the original issue or, if refinanced, over the remaining life of the new issue, which currently does not exceed 34 years.
(g)Recorded as earned by employees and recovered as paid, generally within one year. This includes both vacation and banked holiday pay.
(h)
Through 2019, Georgia Power is recovering approximately $2 million annually for environmental remediation, which is expected to be adjusted in the Georgia Power 2019 Base Rate Case. See Note 3 under Environmental Remediation for additional information.
(i)
Comprised of several components including future generation costs, deferred nuclear outage costs, cancelled construction projects, building lease, and fuel-hedging losses. The timing of recovery of approximately $50 million for a future generation site is expected to be determined in the Georgia Power 2019 Base Rate Case. Nuclear outage costs are recorded and recovered or amortized over the outage cycles of each nuclear unit, which do not exceed 24 months. Approximately $30 million of costs associated with construction of environmental controls that will not be completed as a result of unit retirements are being amortized through 2022. The building lease is recorded and recovered or amortized through 2020. Fuel-hedging losses are recovered through Georgia Power's fuel cost recovery mechanism upon final settlement. See "Integrated Resource Plan" herein for additional information on future generation costs.
(j)
At December 31, 2018, approximately $55 million was accrued and outstanding for refund pursuant to the Georgia Power Tax Reform Settlement Agreement and approximately $100 million was accrued for refund, subject to review and approval by the Georgia PSC, as a result of the 2018 retail ROE exceeding the allowed retail ROE range. See "Rate Plans" herein for additional information.
(k)
Comprised of Demand-Side Management (DSM) tariff over recovery and fuel-hedging gains. The amortization of DSM tariff over recovery of $3 million at December 31, 2018 is expected to be determined in the Georgia Power 2019 Base Rate Case. Fuel-hedging gains are refunded through Georgia Power's fuel cost recovery mechanism upon final settlement. See "Rate Plans" herein for additional information on customer refunds and DSM tariffs.
(l)Generally not earning a return as they are excluded from rate base or are offset in rate base by a corresponding asset or liability.

COMBINED NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)
Southern Company and Subsidiary Companies 2018 Annual Report

Rate Plans
Pursuant to the terms and conditions of a settlement agreement related to Southern Company's acquisition of Southern Company Gas approved by the Georgia PSC in 2016, the 2013 ARP will continue in effect until December 31, 2019, and Georgia Power will be required to file its next base rate case by July 1, 2019. Furthermore, through December 31, 2019, Georgia Power will retain its merger savings, net of transition costs, as defined in the settlement agreement; through December 31, 2022, such net merger savings will be shared on a 60/40 basis with customers; thereafter, all merger savings will be retained by customers.
There were no changes to Georgia Power's traditional base tariff rates, Environmental Compliance Cost Recovery (ECCR) tariff, DSM tariffs, or Municipal Franchise Fee tariff in 2017 or 2018.
Under the 2013 ARP, Georgia Power's retail ROE is set at 10.95% and earnings are evaluated against a retail ROE range of 10.00% to 12.00%. Two-thirds of any earnings above 12.00% will be directly refunded to customers, with the remaining one-third retained by Georgia Power. There will be no recovery of any earnings shortfall below 10.00% on an actual basis. In 2016, Georgia Power's retail ROE exceeded 12.00%, and Georgia Power refunded to retail customers in 2018 approximately $40 million as approved by the Georgia PSC. On February 5, 2019, the Georgia PSC approved a settlement between Georgia Power and the staff of the Georgia PSC under which Georgia Power's retail ROE for 2017 was stipulated to exceed 12.00% and Georgia Power will reduce certain regulatory assets by approximately $4 million in lieu of providing refunds to retail customers. In 2018, Georgia Power's retail ROE exceeded 12.00%, and Georgia Power accrued approximately $100 million to refund to retail customers, subject to review and approval by the Georgia PSC.
On April 3, 2018, the Georgia PSC approved the Georgia Power Tax Reform Settlement Agreement. Pursuant to the Georgia Power Tax Reform Settlement Agreement, to reflect the federal income tax rate reduction impact of the Tax Reform Legislation, Georgia Power will refund to customers a total of $330 million through bill credits. Georgia Power issued bill credits of approximately $130 million in 2018 and will issue bill credits of approximately $95 million in June 2019 and $105 million in February 2020. In addition, Georgia Power is deferring as a regulatory liability (i) the revenue equivalent of the tax expense reduction resulting from legislation lowering the Georgia state income tax rate from 6.00% to 5.75% in 2019 and (ii) the entire benefit of federal and state excess accumulated deferred income taxes, which is expected to total approximately $700 million at December 31, 2019. At December 31, 2018, the related regulatory liability balance totaled $610 million. The amortization of these regulatory liabilities is expected to be addressed in the Georgia Power 2019 Base Rate Case. If there is not a base rate case in 2019, customers will receive $185 million in annual bill credits beginning in 2020, with any additional federal and state income tax savings deferred as a regulatory liability, until Georgia Power's next base rate case.
To address some of the negative cash flow and credit quality impacts of the Tax Reform Legislation, the Georgia PSC also approved an increase in Georgia Power's retail equity ratio to the lower of (i) Georgia Power's actual common equity weight in its capital structure or (ii) 55%, until the Georgia Power 2019 Base Rate Case. At December 31, 2018, Georgia Power's actual retail common equity ratio (on a 13-month average basis) was approximately 55%. Benefits from reduced federal income tax rates in excess of the amounts refunded to customers will be retained by Georgia Power to cover the carrying costs of the incremental equity in 2018 and 2019.
Integrated Resource Plan
In 2016, the Georgia PSC approved Georgia Power's triennial Integrated Resource Plan (2016 IRP) including the reclassification of the remaining net book value of Plant Mitchell Unit 3 and costs associated with materials and supplies remaining at the unit retirement date to a regulatory asset. Recovery of the unit's net book value will continue through December 31, 2019, as provided in the 2013 ARP. The timing of the recovery of the remaining balance of the unit's net book value as of December 31, 2019 and costs associated with materials and supplies remaining at the unit retirement date was deferred for consideration in the Georgia Power 2019 Base Rate Case.
In the 2016 IRP, the Georgia PSC also approved recovery of costs up to $99 million through June 30, 2019 to preserve nuclear generation as an option at a future generation site in Stewart County, Georgia. In March 2017, the Georgia PSC approved Georgia Power's decision to suspend work at the site due to changing economics, including lower load forecasts and fuel costs. The timing of recovery for costs incurred of approximately $50 million is expected to be determined by the Georgia PSC in the Georgia Power 2019 Base Rate Case.
On January 31, 2019, Georgia Power filed its triennial IRP (2019 IRP). The filing includes a request to decertify and retire Plant Hammond Units 1 through 4 (840 MWs) and Plant McIntosh Unit 1 (142.5 MWs) upon approval of the 2019 IRP.
In the 2019 IRP, Georgia Power requested approval to reclassify the remaining net book value of Plant Hammond Units 1 through 4 (approximately $520 million at December 31, 2018) upon retirement to a regulatory asset to be amortized ratably over a period equal to the applicable unit's remaining useful life through 2035. For Plant McIntosh Unit 1, Georgia Power requested approval to

COMBINED NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)
Southern Company and Subsidiary Companies 2018 Annual Report

reclassify the remaining net book value (approximately $40 million at December 31, 2018) upon retirement to a regulatory asset to be amortized over a three-year period to be determined in the Georgia Power 2019 Base Rate Case. Georgia Power also requested approval to reclassify any unusable material and supplies inventory balances remaining at the applicable unit's retirement date to a regulatory asset for recovery over a period to be determined in the Georgia Power 2019 Base Rate Case.
The 2019 IRP also includes a request to certify approximately 25 MWs of capacity at Plant Scherer Unit 3 for the retail jurisdiction beginning January 1, 2020, following the expiration of a wholesale PPA.
The 2019 IRP also includes details regarding ARO costs associated with ash pond and landfill closures and post-closure care. Georgia Power requested the timing and rate of recovery of these costs be determined by the Georgia PSC in the Georgia Power 2019 Base Rate Case. See Note 6 for additional information regarding Georgia Power's AROs.
Georgia Power also requested approval to issue two capacity-based requests for proposals (RFP). If approved, the first capacity-based RFP will seek resources that can provide capacity beginning in 2022 or 2023 and the second capacity-based RFP will seek resources that can provide capacity beginning in 2026, 2027, or 2028. Additionally, the 2019 IRP includes a request to procure an additional 1,000 MWs of renewable resources through a competitive bidding process. Georgia Power also proposed to invest in a portfolio of up to 50 MWs of battery energy storage technologies.
A decision from the Georgia PSC on the 2019 IRP is expected in mid-2019.
The ultimate outcome of these matters cannot be determined at this time.
Fuel Cost Recovery
Georgia Power has established fuel cost recovery rates approved by the Georgia PSC. In 2016, the Georgia PSC approved Georgia Power's request to lower annual billings under an interim fuel rider by approximately $313 million effective June 1, 2016, which expired on December 31, 2017. On August 16, 2018, the Georgia PSC approved the deferral of Georgia Power's next fuel case to no later than March 16, 2020, with new rates, if any, to be effective June 1, 2020. Georgia Power continues to be allowed to adjust its fuel cost recovery rates under an interim fuel rider prior to the next fuel case if the under or over recovered fuel balance exceeds $200 million. Georgia Power's under recovered fuel balance totaled $115 million and $165 million at December 31, 2018 and 2017, respectively, and is included in under recovered fuel clause revenues on Southern Company's and Georgia Power's balance sheets.
Georgia Power's fuel cost recovery mechanism includes costs associated with a natural gas hedging program, as revised and approved by the Georgia PSC, allowing the use of an array of derivative instruments within a 48-month time horizon.
Fuel cost recovery revenues as recorded on the financial statements are adjusted for differences in actual recoverable fuel costs and amounts billed in current regulated rates. Accordingly, changes in the billing factor will not have a significant effect on Southern Company's or Georgia Power's revenues or net income, but will affect operating cash flows.
Storm Damage Recovery
Georgia Power defers and recovers certain costs related to damages from major storms as mandated by the Georgia PSC. Beginning January 1, 2014, Georgia Power is accruing $30 million annually under the 2013 ARP that is recoverable through base rates. At December 31, 2018 and 2017, the balance in the regulatory asset related to storm damage was $416 million and $333 million, respectively, with $30 million included in other regulatory assets, current for each year and $386 million and $303 million included in other regulatory assets, deferred, respectively. During October 2018, Hurricane Michael caused significant damage to Georgia Power's transmission and distribution facilities. The incremental restoration costs related to this hurricane deferred in the regulatory asset for storm damage totaled approximately $115 million. Hurricanes Irma and Matthew also caused significant damage to Georgia Power's transmission and distribution facilities during September 2017 and October 2016, respectively. The incremental restoration costs related to Hurricanes Irma and Matthew deferred in the regulatory asset for storm damage totaled approximately $250 million. The rate of storm damage cost recovery is expected to be adjusted as part of the Georgia Power 2019 Base Rate Case and further adjusted in future regulatory proceedings as necessary. The ultimate outcome of this matter cannot be determined at this time.
Nuclear Construction
In 2009, the Georgia PSC certified construction of Plant Vogtle Units 3 and 4. Georgia Power holds a 45.7% ownership interest in Plant Vogtle Units 3 and 4. In 2012, the NRC issued the related combined construction and operating licenses, which allowed full construction of the two AP1000 nuclear units (with electric generating capacity of approximately 1,100 MWs each) and related facilities to begin. Until March 2017, construction on Plant Vogtle Units 3 and 4 continued under the Vogtle 3 and 4 Agreement,

COMBINED NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)
Southern Company and Subsidiary Companies 2018 Annual Report

which was a substantially fixed price agreement. In March 2017, the EPC Contractor filed for bankruptcy protection under Chapter 11 of the U.S. Bankruptcy Code.
In connection with the EPC Contractor's bankruptcy filing, Georgia Power, acting for itself and as agent for the Vogtle Owners, entered into the Interim Assessment Agreement with the EPC Contractor to allow construction to continue. The Interim Assessment Agreement expired in July 2017 when Georgia Power, acting for itself and as agent for the other Vogtle Owners, and the EPC Contractor entered into the Vogtle Services Agreement. Under the Vogtle Services Agreement, Westinghouse provides facility design and engineering services, procurement and technical support, and staff augmentation on a time and materials cost basis. The Vogtle Services Agreement provides that it will continue until the start-up and testing of Plant Vogtle Units 3 and 4 are complete and electricity is generated and sold from both units. The Vogtle Services Agreement is terminable by the Vogtle Owners upon 30 days' written notice.
In October 2017, Georgia Power, acting for itself and as agent for the other Vogtle Owners, executed the Bechtel Agreement, a cost reimbursable plus fee arrangement, whereby Bechtel is reimbursed for actual costs plus a base fee and an at-risk fee, which is subject to adjustment based on Bechtel's performance against cost and schedule targets. Each Vogtle Owner is severally (not jointly) liable for its proportionate share, based on its ownership interest, of all amounts owed to Bechtel under the Bechtel Agreement. The Vogtle Owners may terminate the Bechtel Agreement at any time for their convenience, provided that the Vogtle Owners will be required to pay amounts related to work performed prior to the termination (including the applicable portion of the base fee), certain termination-related costs, and, at certain stages of the work, the applicable portion of the at-risk fee. Bechtel may terminate the Bechtel Agreement under certain circumstances, including certain Vogtle Owner suspensions of work, certain breaches of the Bechtel Agreement by the Vogtle Owners, Vogtle Owner insolvency, and certain other events. Pursuant to the Loan Guarantee Agreement between Georgia Power and the DOE, Georgia Power is required to obtain the DOE's approval of the Bechtel Agreement prior to obtaining any further advances under the Loan Guarantee Agreement.
Cost and Schedule
Georgia Power's approximate proportionate share of the remaining estimated capital cost to complete Plant Vogtle Units 3 and 4 by the expected in-service dates of November 2021 and November 2022, respectively, is as follows:

(in billions)
Base project capital cost forecast(a)(b)
$8.0
Construction contingency estimate0.4
Total project capital cost forecast(a)(b)
8.4
Net investment as of December 31, 2018(b)
(4.6)
Remaining estimate to complete(a)
$3.8
(a)Excludes financing costs expected to be capitalized through AFUDC of approximately $315 million.
(b)Net of $1.7 billion received from Toshiba under the Guarantee Settlement Agreement and approximately $188 million in related Customer Refunds.
Georgia Power estimates that its financing costs for construction of Plant Vogtle Units 3 and 4 will total approximately $3.1 billion, of which $1.9 billion had been incurred through December 31, 2018.
As construction continues, challenges with management of contractors, subcontractors, and vendors; labor productivity, availability, and/or cost escalation; procurement, fabrication, delivery, assembly, and/or installation and testing, including any required engineering changes, of plant systems, structures, and components (some of which are based on new technology that only recently began initial operation in the global nuclear industry at this scale); or other issues could arise and change the projected schedule and estimated cost. Monthly construction production targets required to maintain the current project schedule will continue to increase significantly throughout 2019. To meet these increasing monthly targets, existing craft construction productivity must improve and additional craft laborers must be retained and deployed.
Georgia Power and Southern Nuclear believe it is a leading practice in connection with a construction project of this size and complexity to periodically validate recent construction progress in comparison to the projected schedule and to verify and update quantities of commodities remaining to install, labor productivity, and forecasted staffing needs. This verification process, led by Southern Nuclear, was underway as of December 31, 2018 and is expected to be completed during the second quarter 2019. Georgia Power currently does not anticipate any material changes to the total estimated project capital cost forecast for Plant Vogtle Units 3 and 4 or the expected in-service dates of November 2021 and November 2022, respectively, resulting from this verification process. However, the ultimate impact on cost and schedule, if any, will not be known until the verification process is completed. Georgia Power is required to report the results and any project impacts to the Georgia PSC by May 15, 2019.

COMBINED NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)
Southern Company and Subsidiary Companies 2018 Annual Report

There have been technical and procedural challenges to the construction and licensing of Plant Vogtle Units 3 and 4 at the federal and state level and additional challenges may arise. Processes are in place that are designed to assure compliance with the requirements specified in the Westinghouse Design Control Document and the combined construction and operating licenses, including inspections by Southern Nuclear and the NRC that occur throughout construction. As a result of such compliance processes, certain license amendment requests have been filed and approved or are pending before the NRC. Various design and other licensing-based compliance matters, including the timely resolution of ITAAC and the related approvals by the NRC, may arise, which may result in additional license amendments or require other resolution. If any license amendment requests or other licensing-based compliance issues are not resolved in a timely manner, there may be delays in the project schedule that could result in increased costs.
The ultimate outcome of these matters cannot be determined at this time. However, any extension of the project schedule is currently estimated to result in additional base capital costs of approximately $50 million per month, based on Georgia Power's ownership interests, and AFUDC of approximately $12 million per month. While Georgia Power is not precluded from seeking recovery of any future capital cost forecast increase, management will ultimately determine whether or not to seek recovery. Any further changes to the capital cost forecast that are not expected to be recoverable through regulated rates will be required to be charged to income and such charges could be material.
Joint Owner Contracts
In November 2017, the Vogtle Owners entered into an amendment to their joint ownership agreements for Plant Vogtle Units 3 and 4 to provide for, among other conditions, additional Vogtle Owner approval requirements. Effective August 31, 2018, the Vogtle Owners further amended the joint ownership agreements to clarify and provide procedures for certain provisions of the joint ownership agreements related to adverse events that require the vote of the holders of at least 90% of the ownership interests in Plant Vogtle Units 3 and 4 to continue construction (as amended, and together with the November 2017 amendment, the Vogtle Joint Ownership Agreements). The Vogtle Joint Ownership Agreements also confirm that the Vogtle Owners' sole recourse against Georgia Power or Southern Nuclear for any action or inaction in connection with their performance as agent for the Vogtle Owners is limited to removal of Georgia Power and/or Southern Nuclear as agent, except in cases of willful misconduct.
As a result of the increase in the total project capital cost forecast and Georgia Power's decision not to seek rate recovery of the increase in the base capital costs as described below, the holders of at least 90% of the ownership interests in Plant Vogtle Units 3 and 4 were required to vote to continue construction. On September 26, 2018, the Vogtle Owners unanimously voted to continue construction of Plant Vogtle Units 3 and 4.
Amendments to the Vogtle Joint Ownership Agreements
In connection with the vote to continue construction, Georgia Power entered into (i) a binding term sheet (Vogtle Owner Term Sheet) with the other Vogtle Owners and MEAG's wholly-owned subsidiaries MEAG Power SPVJ, LLC (MEAG SPVJ), MEAG Power SPVM, LLC (MEAG SPVM), and MEAG Power SPVP, LLC (MEAG SPVP) to take certain actions which partially mitigate potential financial exposure for the other Vogtle Owners, including additional amendments to the Vogtle Joint Ownership Agreements and the purchase of PTCs from the other Vogtle Owners, and (ii) a term sheet (MEAG Term Sheet) with MEAG and MEAG SPVJ to provide funding with respect to MEAG SPVJ's ownership interest in Plant Vogtle Units 3 and 4 (Project J) under certain circumstances. On January 14, 2019, Georgia Power, MEAG, and MEAG SPVJ entered into an agreement to implement the provisions of the MEAG Term Sheet (MEAG Funding Agreement). On February 18, 2019, Georgia Power, the other Vogtle Owners, and MEAG's wholly-owned subsidiaries MEAG SPVJ, MEAG SPVM, and MEAG SPVP entered into certain amendments to the Vogtle Joint Ownership Agreements to implement the provisions of the Vogtle Owner Term Sheet (Global Amendments).
Pursuant to the Global Amendments, and consistent with the Vogtle Owner Term Sheet, the Vogtle Joint Ownership Agreements were modified as follows: (i) each Vogtle Owner must pay its proportionate share of qualifying construction costs for Plant Vogtle Units 3 and 4 based on its ownership percentage up to the estimated cost at completion (EAC) for Plant Vogtle Units 3 and 4 which formed the basis of Georgia Power's forecast of $8.4 billion in the nineteenth VCM plus $800 million; (ii) Georgia Power will be responsible for 55.7% of actual qualifying construction costs between $800 million and $1.6 billion over the EAC in the nineteenth VCM (resulting in $80 million of potential additional costs to Georgia Power), with the remaining Vogtle Owners responsible for 44.3% of such costs pro rata in accordance with their respective ownership interests; and (iii) Georgia Power will be responsible for 65.7% of qualifying construction costs between $1.6 billion and $2.1 billion over the EAC in the nineteenth VCM (resulting in a further $100 million of potential additional costs to Georgia Power), with the remaining Vogtle Owners responsible for 34.3% of such costs pro rata in accordance with their respective ownership interests.
If the EAC is revised and exceeds the EAC in the nineteenth VCM by more than $2.1 billion, each of the other Vogtle Owners will have a one-time option at the time the project budget forecast is so revised to tender a portion of its ownership interest to

COMBINED NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)
Southern Company and Subsidiary Companies 2018 Annual Report

Georgia Power in exchange for Georgia Power's agreement to pay 100% of such Vogtle Owner's remaining share of total construction costs in excess of the EAC in the nineteenth VCM plus $2.1 billion. In this event, Georgia Power will have the option of cancelling the project in lieu of purchasing a portion of the ownership interest of any other Vogtle Owner. If Georgia Power accepts the offer to purchase a portion of another Vogtle Owner's ownership interest in Plant Vogtle Units 3 and 4, the ownership interest(s) to be conveyed from the tendering Vogtle Owner(s) to Georgia Power will be calculated based on the proportion of the cumulative amount of construction costs paid by each such tendering Vogtle Owner(s) and by Georgia Power as of the COD of Plant Vogtle Unit 4. For purposes of this calculation, payments made by Georgia Power on behalf of another Vogtle Owner in accordance with the second and third items described in the paragraph above will be treated as payments made by the applicable Vogtle Owner.
In the event the actual costs of construction at completion of a Unit are less than the EAC reflected in the nineteenth VCM report and such Unit is placed in service in accordance with the schedule projected in the nineteenth VCM report (i.e., Plant Vogtle Unit 3 is placed in service by November 2021 or Plant Vogtle Unit 4 is placed in service by November 2022), Georgia Power will be entitled to 60.7% of the cost savings with respect to the relevant Unit and the remaining Vogtle Owners will be entitled to 39.3% of such savings on a pro rata basis in accordance with their respective ownership interests.
For purposes of the foregoing provisions, qualifying construction costs will not include costs (i) resulting from force majeure events, including governmental actions or inactions (or significant delays associated with issuance of such actions) that affect the licensing, completion, start-up, operations, or financing of Plant Vogtle Units 3 and 4, administrative proceedings or litigation regarding ITAAC or other regulatory challenges to commencement of operation of Plant Vogtle Units 3 and 4, and changes in laws or regulations governing Plant Vogtle Units 3 and 4, (ii) legal fees and legal expenses incurred due to litigation with contractors or subcontractors that are not subsidiaries or affiliates of Southern Company, and (iii) additional costs caused by requests from the Vogtle Owners other than Georgia Power, except for the exercise of a right to vote granted under the Vogtle Joint Ownership Agreements, that increase costs by $100,000 or more.
Pursuant to the Global Amendments, and consistent with the Vogtle Owner Term Sheet, the provisions of the Vogtle Joint Ownership Agreements requiring that Vogtle Owners holding 90% of the ownership interests in Plant Vogtle Units 3 and 4 vote to continue construction following certain adverse events (Project Adverse Events) were modified. Pursuant to the Global Amendments, the holders of at least 90% of the ownership interests in Plant Vogtle Units 3 and 4 must vote to continue construction if certain Project Adverse Events occur, including: (i) the bankruptcy of Toshiba; (ii) the termination or rejection in bankruptcy of certain agreements, including the Vogtle Services Agreement, the Bechtel Agreement, or the agency agreement with Southern Nuclear; (iii) Georgia Power publicly announces its intention not to submit for rate recovery any portion of its investment in Plant Vogtle Units 3 and 4 or the Georgia PSC determines that any of Georgia Power's costs relating to the construction of Plant Vogtle Units 3 and 4 will not be recovered in retail rates, excluding any additional amounts paid by Georgia Power on behalf of the other Vogtle Owners pursuant to the Global Amendments described above and the first 6% of costs during any six-month VCM reporting period that are disallowed by the Georgia PSC for recovery, or for which Georgia Power elects not to seek cost recovery, through retail rates; and (iv) an incremental extension of one year or more over the most recently approved schedule. Under the Global Amendments, Georgia Power may cancel the project at any time in its sole discretion.
In addition, pursuant to the Vogtle Joint Ownership Agreements, the required approval of holders of ownership interests in Plant Vogtle Units 3 and 4 is at least (i) 90% for a change of the primary construction contractor and (ii) 67% for material amendments to the Vogtle Services Agreement or agreements with Southern Nuclear or the primary construction contractor, including the Bechtel Agreement.
The Global Amendments provide that if the holders of at least 90% of the ownership interests fail to vote in favor of continuing the project following any future Project Adverse Event, work on Plant Vogtle Units 3 and 4 will continue for a period of 30 days if the holders of more than 50% of the ownership interests vote in favor of continuing construction (Majority Voting Owners). In such a case, the Vogtle Owners (i) have agreed to negotiate in good faith towards the resumption of the project, (ii) if no agreement is reached during such 30-day period, the project will be cancelled, and (iii) in the event of such a cancellation, the Majority Voting Owners will be obligated to reimburse any other Vogtle Owner for the incremental costs it incurred during such 30-day negotiation period.
Purchase of PTCs During Commercial Operation
Pursuant to the Global Amendments, and consistent with the Vogtle Owner Term Sheet, Georgia Power has agreed to purchase additional PTCs from OPC, Dalton, MEAG SPVM, MEAG SPVP, and MEAG SPVJ (to the extent any MEAG SPVJ PTC rights remain after any purchases required under the MEAG Funding Agreement as described below) at varying purchase prices dependent upon the actual cost to complete construction of Plant Vogtle Units 3 and 4 as compared to the EAC reflected in the nineteenth VCM report. The purchases are at the option of the applicable Vogtle Owner.

COMBINED NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)
Southern Company and Subsidiary Companies 2018 Annual Report

Potential Funding to MEAG Project J
Pursuant to the MEAG Funding Agreement, and consistent with the MEAG Term Sheet, if MEAG SPVJ is unable to make its payments due under the Vogtle Joint Ownership Agreements solely as a result of the occurrence of one of the following situations that materially impedes access to capital markets for MEAG for Project J: (i) the conduct of JEA or the City of Jacksonville, such as JEA's legal challenges of its obligations under a PPA with MEAG (PPA-J), or (ii) PPA-J is declared void by a court of competent jurisdiction or rejected by JEA under the applicable provisions of the U.S. Bankruptcy Code (each of (i) and (ii), a JEA Default), at MEAG's request, Georgia Power will purchase from MEAG SPVJ the rights to PTCs attributable to MEAG SPVJ's share of Plant Vogtle Units 3 and 4 (approximately 206 MWs) within 30 days of such request at varying prices dependent upon the stage of construction of Plant Vogtle Units 3 and 4. The aggregate purchase price of the PTCs, together with any advances made as described in the next paragraph, shall not exceed $300 million.
At the option of MEAG, as an alternative or supplement to Georgia Power's purchase of PTCs as described above, Georgia Power has agreed to provide up to $250 million in funding to MEAG for Project J in the form of advances (either advances under the Vogtle Joint Ownership Agreements or the purchase of MEAG Project J bonds, at the discretion of Georgia Power), subject to any required approvals of the Georgia PSC and the DOE.
In the event MEAG SPVJ certifies to Georgia Power that it is unable to fund its obligations under the Vogtle Joint Ownership Agreements as a result of a JEA Default and Georgia Power becomes obligated to provide funding as described above, MEAG is required to (i) assign to Georgia Power its right to vote on any future Project Adverse Event and (ii) diligently pursue JEA for its breach of PPA-J. In addition, Georgia Power agreed that it will not sue MEAG for any amounts due from MEAG SPVJ under MEAG's guarantee of MEAG SPVJ's obligations so long as MEAG SPVJ complies with the terms of the MEAG Funding Agreement as to its payment obligations and the other non-payment provisions of the Vogtle Joint Ownership Agreements.
Under the terms of the MEAG Funding Agreement, Georgia Power may cancel the project in lieu of providing funding in the form of advances or PTC purchases.
The ultimate outcome of these matters cannot be determined at this time.
Regulatory Matters
In 2009, the Georgia PSC voted to certify construction of Plant Vogtle Units 3 and 4 with a certified capital cost of $4.418 billion. In addition, in 2009 the Georgia PSC approved inclusion of the Plant Vogtle Units 3 and 4 related CWIP accounts in rate base, and the State of Georgia enacted the Georgia Nuclear Energy Financing Act, which allows Georgia Power to recover financing costs for Plant Vogtle Units 3 and 4. Financing costs are recovered on all applicable certified costs through annual adjustments to the NCCR tariff up to the certified capital cost of $4.418 billion. At December 31, 2018, Georgia Power had recovered approximately $1.9 billion of financing costs. Financing costs related to capital costs above $4.418 billion will be recovered through AFUDC; however, Georgia Power will not record AFUDC related to any capital costs in excess of the total deemed reasonable by the Georgia PSC (currently $7.3 billion) and not requested for rate recovery. On December 18, 2018, the Georgia PSC approved Georgia Power's request to increase the NCCR tariff by $88 million annually, effective January 1, 2019.
Georgia Power is required to file semi-annual VCM reports with the Georgia PSC by February 28 and August 31 of each year. In 2013, in connection with the eighth VCM report, the Georgia PSC approved a stipulation between Georgia Power and the staff of the Georgia PSC to waive the requirement to amend the Plant Vogtle Units 3 and 4 certificate in accordance with the 2009 certification order until the completion of Plant Vogtle Unit 3, or earlier if deemed appropriate by the Georgia PSC and Georgia Power.
In 2016, the Georgia PSC voted to approve a settlement agreement (Vogtle Cost Settlement Agreement) resolving certain prudency matters in connection with the fifteenth VCM report. In December 2017, the Georgia PSC voted to approve (and issued its related order on January 11, 2018) Georgia Power's seventeenth VCM report, which included a recommendation to continue construction with Southern Nuclear as project manager and Bechtel serving as the primary construction contractor, and modified the Vogtle Cost Settlement Agreement. The Vogtle Cost Settlement Agreement, as modified by the January 11, 2018 order, resolved the following regulatory matters related to Plant Vogtle Units 3 and 4: (i) none of the $3.3 billion of costs incurred through December 31, 2015 and reflected in the fourteenth VCM report should be disallowed from rate base on the basis of imprudence; (ii) the Contractor Settlement Agreement was reasonable and prudent and none of the amounts paid pursuant to the Contractor Settlement Agreement should be disallowed from rate base on the basis of imprudence; (iii) (a) capital costs incurred up to $5.68 billion would be presumed to be reasonable and prudent with the burden of proof on any party challenging such costs, (b) Georgia Power would have the burden to show that any capital costs above $5.68 billion were prudent, and (c) a revised capital cost forecast of $7.3 billion (after reflecting the impact of payments received under the Guarantee Settlement Agreement and related Customer Refunds) was found reasonable; (iv) construction of Plant Vogtle Units 3 and 4 should be completed, with Southern Nuclear serving as project manager and Bechtel as primary contractor; (v) approved and deemed reasonable Georgia

COMBINED NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)
Southern Company and Subsidiary Companies 2018 Annual Report

Power's revised schedule placing Plant Vogtle Units 3 and 4 in service in November 2021 and November 2022, respectively; (vi) confirmed that the revised cost forecast does not represent a cost cap and that prudence decisions on cost recovery will be made at a later date, consistent with applicable Georgia law; (vii) reduced the ROE used to calculate the NCCR tariff (a) from 10.95% (the ROE rate setting point authorized by the Georgia PSC in the 2013 ARP) to 10.00% effective January 1, 2016, (b) from 10.00% to 8.30%, effective January 1, 2020, and (c) from 8.30% to 5.30%, effective January 1, 2021 (provided that the ROE in no case will be less than Georgia Power's average cost of long-term debt); (viii) reduced the ROE used for AFUDC equity for Plant Vogtle Units 3 and 4 from 10.00% to Georgia Power's average cost of long-term debt, effective January 1, 2018; and (ix) agreed that upon Unit 3 reaching commercial operation, retail base rates would be adjusted to include carrying costs on those capital costs deemed prudent in the Vogtle Cost Settlement Agreement. The January 11, 2018 order also stated that if Plant Vogtle Units 3 and 4 are not commercially operational by June 1, 2021 and June 1, 2022, respectively, the ROE used to calculate the NCCR tariff will be further reduced by 10 basis points each month (but not lower than Georgia Power's average cost of long-term debt) until the respective Unit is commercially operational. The ROE reductions negatively impacted earnings by approximately $100 million, $25 million, and $20 million in 2018, 2017, and 2016, respectively, and are estimated to have negative earnings impacts of approximately $75 million in 2019 and an aggregate of approximately $615 million from 2020 to 2022.
In its January 11, 2018 order, the Georgia PSC also stated if other conditions change and assumptions upon which Georgia Power's seventeenth VCM report are based do not materialize, the Georgia PSC reserved the right to reconsider the decision to continue construction.
On February 12, 2018, Georgia Interfaith Power & Light, Inc. (GIPL) and Partnership for Southern Equity, Inc. (PSE) filed a petition appealing the Georgia PSC's January 11, 2018 order with the Fulton County Superior Court. On March 8, 2018, Georgia Watch filed a similar appeal to the Fulton County Superior Court for judicial review of the Georgia PSC's decision and denial of Georgia Watch's motion for reconsideration. On December 21, 2018, the Fulton County Superior Court granted Georgia Power's motion to dismiss the two appeals. On January 9, 2019, GIPL, PSE, and Georgia Watch filed an appeal of this decision with the Georgia Court of Appeals. Georgia Power believes the appeal has no merit; however, an adverse outcome in the appeal combined with subsequent adverse action by the Georgia PSC could have a material impact on Southern Company's and Georgia Power's results of operations, financial condition, and liquidity.
In preparation for its nineteenth VCM filing, Georgia Power requested Southern Nuclear to perform a full cost reforecast for the project. This reforecast, performed prior to the nineteenth VCM filing, resulted in a $0.7 billion increase to the base capital cost forecast reported in the second quarter 2018. This base cost increase primarily resulted from changed assumptions related to the finalization of contract scopes and management responsibilities for Bechtel and over 60 subcontractors, labor productivity rates, and craft labor incentives, as well as the related levels of project management, oversight, and support, including field supervision and engineering support.
Although Georgia Power believes these incremental costs are reasonable and necessary to complete the project and the Georgia PSC's order in the seventeenth VCM proceeding specifically states that the construction of Plant Vogtle Units 3 and 4 is not subject to a cost cap, Georgia Power did not seek rate recovery for these cost increases included in the current base capital cost forecast (or any related financing costs) in the nineteenth VCM report. In connection with future VCM filings, Georgia Power may request the Georgia PSC to evaluate costs currently included in the construction contingency estimate for rate recovery as and when they are appropriately included in the base capital cost forecast. After considering the significant level of uncertainty that exists regarding the future recoverability of costs included in the construction contingency estimate since the ultimate outcome of these matters is subject to the outcome of future assessments by management, as well as Georgia PSC decisions in these future regulatory proceedings, Georgia Power recorded a total pre-tax charge to income of $1.1 billion ($0.8 billion after tax) in the second quarter 2018, which includes the total increase in the base capital cost forecast and construction contingency estimate.
On August 31, 2018, Georgia Power filed its nineteenth VCM report with the Georgia PSC, which requested approval of $578 million of construction capital costs incurred from January 1, 2018 through June 30, 2018. On February 19, 2019, the Georgia PSC approved the nineteenth VCM, but deferred approval of $51.6 million of expenditures related to Georgia Power's portion of an administrative claim filed in the Westinghouse bankruptcy proceedings. Through the nineteenth VCM, the Georgia PSC has approved total construction capital costs incurred through June 30, 2018 of $5.4 billion (before $1.7 billion of payments received under the Guarantee Settlement Agreement and approximately $188 million in related Customer Refunds). In addition, the staff of the Georgia PSC requested, and Georgia Power agreed, to file its twentieth VCM report concurrently with the twenty-first VCM report by August 31, 2019.
The ultimate outcome of these matters cannot be determined at this time.

COMBINED NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)
Southern Company and Subsidiary Companies 2018 Annual Report

DOE Financing
At December 31, 2018, Georgia Power had borrowed $2.6 billion related to Plant Vogtle Units 3 and 4 costs through the Loan Guarantee Agreement and a multi-advance credit facility among Georgia Power, the DOE, and the FFB, which provides for borrowings of up to $3.46 billion, subject to the satisfaction of certain conditions. In September 2017, the DOE issued a conditional commitment to Georgia Power for up to approximately $1.67 billion in additional guaranteed loans under the Loan Guarantee Agreement. In September 2018, the DOE extended the conditional commitment to March 31, 2019. Any further extension must be approved by the DOE. Final approval and issuance of these additional loan guarantees by the DOE cannot be assured and are subject to the negotiation of definitive agreements, completion of due diligence by the DOE, receipt of any necessary regulatory approvals, and satisfaction of other conditions. See Note 8 under "Long-term DebtDOE Loan Guarantee Borrowings" for additional information, including applicable covenants, events of default, mandatory prepayment events (including any decision not to continue construction of Plant Vogtle Units 3 and 4), and conditions to borrowing.
The ultimate outcome of these matters cannot be determined at this time.

COMBINED NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)
Southern Company and Subsidiary Companies 2018 Annual Report

Mississippi Power
Regulatory Assets and Liabilities
Regulatory assets and (liabilities) reflected in the balance sheets of Mississippi Power at December 31, 2018 and 2017 relate to:
 2018 2017 Note
 (in millions)
Retiree benefit plans – regulatory assets$171
 $174
 (a)
Asset retirement obligations143
 95
 (b)
Kemper County energy facility assets, net69
 88
 (c)
Remaining net book value of retired assets41
 44
 (d)
Property tax44
 43
 (e)
Deferred charges related to income taxes34
 36
 (b)
Plant Daniel Units 3 and 436
 36
 (f)
ECO carryforward26
 26
 (g)
Other regulatory assets28
 28
 (h)
Deferred credits related to income taxes(377) (377) (i)
Other cost of removal obligations(185) (178) (b)
Property damage(56) (57) (j)
Other regulatory liabilities(9) 
 (k)
Total regulatory assets (liabilities), net$(35) $(42)  
Note: Unless otherwise noted, the recovery and amortization periods for these regulatory assets and (liabilities) are approved by the Mississippi PSC and are as follows:
(a)Recovered and amortized over the average remaining service period which may range up to 15 years. See Note 11 for additional information.
(b)Asset retirement and other cost of removal obligations and deferred charges related to income taxes are generally recovered over the related property lives, which may range up to 48 years. Asset retirement and other cost of removal obligations will be settled and trued up upon completion of removal activities over a period to be determined by the Mississippi PSC.
(c)
Includes $91 million of regulatory assets and $22 million of regulatory liabilities. The retail portion includes $75 million of regulatory assets and $22 million of regulatory liabilities that are being recovered in rates over an eight-year period through 2025 and a six-year period through 2023, respectively. Recovery of the wholesale portion of the regulatory assets in the amount of $16 million is expected to be determined in a settlement agreement with wholesale customers in 2019. For additional information, see "Kemper County Energy Facility – Rate Recovery – Kemper Settlement Agreement" herein.
(d)Retail portion includes approximately $26 million being recovered over a five-year period through 2021 and 2022 for Plant Watson and Plant Greene County, respectively. Recovery of the wholesale portion of approximately $15 million is expected to be determined in a settlement agreement with wholesale customers in 2019.
(e)
Recovered through the ad valorem tax adjustment clause over a 12-month period beginning in April of the following year. See "Ad Valorem Tax Adjustment" herein for additional information.
(f)Represents the difference between the revenue requirement under the purchase option and the revenue requirement assuming operating lease accounting treatment for the extended term, which will be amortized over a 10-year period beginning October 2021.
(g)Generally recovered through the ECO Plan clause in the year following the deferral. See "Environmental Compliance Plan" herein.
(h)Comprised of $9 million related to vacation pay, $8 million related to loss on reacquired debt, and other miscellaneous assets. These costs are recorded and recovered or amortized over periods which may range up to 50 years. This amount also includes fuel-hedging assets which are recorded over the life of the underlying hedged purchase contracts, which generally do not exceed three years. Upon final settlement, actual costs incurred are recovered through the ECM.
(i)
Includes excess deferred income taxes primarily associated with Tax Reform Legislation of $377 million, of which $266 million is related to protected deferred income taxes to be recovered over the related property lives utilizing the average rate assumption method in accordance with IRS normalization principles and $111 million related to unprotected (not subject to normalization). The unprotected portion associated with the Kemper County energy facility is $46 million, of which $33 million is being amortized over eight years through 2025 for retail and the amortization of $15 million is expected to be determined in a settlement agreement with wholesale customers in 2019. Mississippi Power also has $9 million of excess deferred income tax benefits associated with the System Restoration Rider being amortized over an eight-year period through 2025. Amortization of the remaining portions of the unprotected deferred income taxes associated with the Tax Reform Legislation are expected to be determined in Mississippi Power's next base rate proceeding, which is scheduled to be filed in the fourth quarter 2019 (Mississippi Power 2019 Base Rate Case). See "Kemper County Energy Facility" and "FERC Matters – Mississippi Power – Municipal and Rural Associations Tariff" herein and Note 10 for additional information.
(j)
For additional information, see "System Restoration Rider" herein.
(k)Comprised of numerous immaterial components including deferred income tax credits and other miscellaneous liabilities that are recorded and refunded or amortized generally over periods not exceeding one year.

COMBINED NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)
Southern Company and Subsidiary Companies 2018 Annual Report

Operations Review
In August 2018, the Mississippi PSC began an operations review of Mississippi Power, for which the final report is expected prior to the conclusion of the Mississippi Power 2019 Base Rate Case. Mississippi Power expects that the review will include, but not be limited to, a comparative analysis of its costs, its cost recovery framework, and ways in which it may streamline management operations for the reasonable benefit of ratepayers. The ultimate outcome of this matter cannot be determined at this time.
Performance Evaluation Plan
Mississippi Power's retail base rates generally are set under the PEP, a rate plan approved by the Mississippi PSC. Two filings are made for each calendar year: the PEP projected filing, which is typically filed prior to the beginning of the year based on a projected revenue requirement, and the PEP lookback filing, which is filed after the end of the year and allows for review of the actual revenue requirement compared to the projected filing.
In 2011, Mississippi Power submitted its annual PEP lookback filing for 2010, which recommended no surcharge or refund. Later in 2011, the MPUS disputed certain items in the 2010 PEP lookback filing. In 2012, the Mississippi PSC issued an order canceling Mississippi Power's PEP lookback filing for 2011. In 2013, the MPUS contested Mississippi Power's PEP lookback filing for 2012, which indicated a refund due to customers of $5 million. In 2014 through 2018, Mississippi Power submitted its annual PEP lookback filings for the prior years, which for each of 2013, 2014, and 2017 indicated no surcharge or refund and for each of 2015 and 2016 indicated a $5 million surcharge. Additionally, in July 2016, in November 2016, and in November 2017, Mississippi Power submitted its annual projected PEP filings for 2016, 2017, and 2018, respectively, which for 2016 and 2017 indicated no change in rates and for 2018 indicated a rate increase of 4%, or $38 million in annual revenues. The Mississippi PSC suspended each of these filings to allow more time for review.
On February 7, 2018, Mississippi Power revised its annual projected PEP filing for 2018 to reflect the impacts of the Tax Reform Legislation. The revised filing requested an increase of $26 million in annual revenues, based on a performance adjusted ROE of 9.33% and an increased equity ratio of 55%. On July 27, 2018, Mississippi Power and the MPUS entered into a settlement agreement, which was approved by the Mississippi PSC on August 7, 2018, with respect to the 2018 PEP filing and all unresolved PEP filings for prior years (PEP Settlement Agreement). Rates under the PEP Settlement Agreement became effective with the first billing cycle of September 2018. The PEP Settlement Agreement provides for an increase of approximately $21.6 million in annual base retail revenues, which excludes certain compensation costs contested by the MPUS, as well as approximately $2 million which was subsequently approved for recovery through the 2018 Energy Efficiency Cost Rider as discussed below. Under the PEP Settlement Agreement, Mississippi Power is deferring the contested compensation costs for 2018 and 2019 as a regulatory asset, which totaled $4 million as of December 31, 2018 and is included in other regulatory assets, deferred on the balance sheet. The Mississippi PSC is currently expected to rule on the appropriate treatment for such costs in connection with the Mississippi Power 2019 Base Rate Case. The ultimate outcome of this matter cannot be determined at this time.
Pursuant to the PEP Settlement Agreement, Mississippi Power's performance-adjusted allowed ROE is 9.31% and its allowed equity ratio is capped at 51%, pending further review by the Mississippi PSC. In lieu of the requested equity ratio increase, Mississippi Power retained $44 million of excess accumulated deferred income taxes resulting from the Tax Reform Legislation until the conclusion of the Mississippi Power 2019 Base Rate Case. Further, Mississippi Power agreed to seek equity contributions sufficient to restore its equity ratio to 50% by December 31, 2018. Since Mississippi Power's actual average equity ratio for 2018 was more than 1% lower than the 50% target, Mississippi Power deferred the corresponding difference in its revenue requirement of approximately $4 million as a regulatory liability for resolution in the Mississippi Power 2019 Base Rate Case. Pursuant to the PEP Settlement Agreement, PEP proceedings are suspended until after the conclusion of the Mississippi Power 2019 Base Rate Case and Mississippi Power is not required to make any PEP filings for regulatory years 2018, 2019, and 2020. The PEP Settlement Agreement also resolved all open PEP filings with no change to customer rates. As a result, in the third quarter 2018, Mississippi Power recognized revenues of $5 million previously reserved in connection with the 2012 PEP lookback filing.
Energy Efficiency
In 2013, the Mississippi PSC approved an energy efficiency and conservation rule requiring electric and gas utilities in Mississippi serving more than 25,000 customers to implement energy efficiency programs and standards. Quick Start Plans, which include a portfolio of energy efficiency programs that are intended to provide benefits to a majority of customers, were extended by an order issued by the Mississippi PSC in July 2016, until the time the Mississippi PSC approves a comprehensive portfolio plan program. The ultimate outcome of this matter cannot be determined at this time.

COMBINED NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)
Southern Company and Subsidiary Companies 2018 Annual Report

On May 8, 2018, the Mississippi PSC issued an order approving Mississippi Power's revised annual projected Energy Efficiency Cost Rider 2018 compliance filing, which increased annual retail revenues by approximately $3 million effective with the first billing cycle for June 2018.
On February 5, 2019, the Mississippi PSC issued an order approving Mississippi Power's Energy Efficiency Cost Rider 2019 compliance filing, which included a slight decrease in annual retail revenues, effective with the first billing cycle in March 2019.
Environmental Compliance Overview Plan
In accordance with a 2011 accounting order from the Mississippi PSC, Mississippi Power has the authority to defer in a regulatory asset for future recovery all plant retirement- or partial retirement-related costs resulting from environmental regulations. The Mississippi PSC approved $41 million and $17 million of costs that were reclassified to regulatory assets associated with the fuel conversion of Plant Watson and Plant Greene County, respectively, for amortization over five-year periods that began in July 2016 and July 2017, respectively. As a result, these decisions are not expected to have a material impact on Mississippi Power's financial statements.
In August 2016, the Mississippi PSC approved Mississippi Power's revised ECO Plan filing for 2016, which requested the maximum 2% annual increase in revenues, or approximately $18 million, primarily related to the Plant Daniel Units 1 and 2 scrubbers placed in service in 2015. The revised rates became effective with the first billing cycle for September 2016. Approximately $22 million of related revenue requirements in excess of the 2% maximum was deferred for inclusion in the 2017 filing, along with related carrying costs.
In May 2017, the Mississippi PSC approved Mississippi Power's ECO Plan filing for 2017, which requested the maximum 2% annual increase in revenues, or approximately $18 million, primarily related to the carryforward from the prior year. The rates became effective with the first billing cycle for June 2017. Approximately $26 million, plus carrying costs, of related revenue requirements in excess of the 2% maximum was deferred for inclusion in the 2018 filing.
On February 14, 2018, Mississippi Power submitted its ECO Plan filing for 2018, including the effects of the Tax Reform Legislation, which requested the maximum 2% annual increase in revenues, or approximately $17 million, primarily related to the carryforward from the prior year.
On August 3, 2018, Mississippi Power and the MPUS entered into the ECO Settlement Agreement, which provides for an increase of approximately $17 million in annual base retail revenues and was approved by the Mississippi PSC on August 7, 2018. Rates under the ECO Settlement Agreement became effective with the first billing cycle of September 2018 and will continue in effect until modified by the Mississippi PSC. These revenues are expected to be sufficient to recover the costs included in Mississippi Power's request for 2018, as well as the remaining deferred amounts, totaling $26 million at December 31, 2018, along with the related carrying costs. In accordance with the ECO Settlement Agreement, ECO Plan proceedings are suspended until after the conclusion of the Mississippi Power 2019 Base Rate Case and Mississippi Power is not required to make any ECO Plan filings for 2018, 2019, and 2020, with any necessary adjustments to be reflected in the Mississippi Power 2019 Base Rate Case. The ECO Settlement Agreement contains the same terms as the PEP Settlement Agreement described herein with respect to allowed ROE and equity ratio. At December 31, 2018, Mississippi Power has recorded $2 million in other regulatory liabilities, deferred on the balance sheet related to the actual December 31, 2018 average equity ratio differential from target applicable to the ECO Plan.
Fuel Cost Recovery
Mississippi Power establishes, annually, a retail fuel cost recovery factor that is approved by the Mississippi PSC. Mississippi Power is required to file for an adjustment to the retail fuel cost recovery factor annually. In January 2017, the Mississippi PSC approved the 2017 retail fuel cost recovery factor, effective February 2017 through January 2018, which resulted in an annual revenue increase of $55 million. On January 16, 2018, the Mississippi PSC approved the 2018 retail fuel cost recovery factor, effective February 2018 through January 2019, which resulted in an annual revenue increase of $39 million. At December 31, 2018, the amount of over recovered retail fuel costs included in the balance sheet in other accounts payable was approximately $8 million compared to $6 million under recovered at December 31, 2017. On January 10, 2019, the Mississippi PSC approved the 2019 retail fuel cost recovery factor, effective February 2019, which results in a $35 million decrease in annual revenues as a result of lower expected fuel costs.
Mississippi Power's operating revenues are adjusted for differences in actual recoverable fuel cost and amounts billed in accordance with the currently approved cost recovery rate. Accordingly, changes in the billing factor should have no significant effect on Southern Company's or Mississippi Power's revenues or net income but will affect operating cash flows.

COMBINED NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)
Southern Company and Subsidiary Companies 2018 Annual Report

Ad Valorem Tax Adjustment
Mississippi Power establishes annually an ad valorem tax adjustment factor that is approved by the Mississippi PSC to collect the ad valorem taxes paid by Mississippi Power. In 2018, 2017, and 2016, the Mississippi PSC approved Mississippi Power's annual ad valorem tax adjustment factor filing, which included a rate increase of 0.8%, or $7 million, in 2018, a rate increase of 0.85%, or $8 million, in 2017, and a rate decrease of 0.07%, or $1 million, in 2016.
System Restoration Rider
Mississippi Power carries insurance for the cost of certain types of damage to generation plants and general property. However, Mississippi Power is self-insured for the cost of storm, fire, and other uninsured casualty damage to its property, including transmission and distribution facilities. As permitted by the Mississippi PSC and the FERC, Mississippi Power accrues for the cost of such damage through an annual expense accrual credited to regulatory liability accounts for the retail and wholesale jurisdictions. The cost of repairing actual damage resulting from such events that individually exceed $50,000 is charged to the reserve. Every three years the Mississippi PSC, the MPUS, and Mississippi Power will agree on SRR revenue level(s) for the ensuing period, based on historical data, expected exposure, type and amount of insurance coverage, excluding insurance cost, and any other relevant information. The accrual amount and the reserve balance are determined based on the SRR revenue level(s). If a significant change in circumstances occurs, then the SRR revenue level can be adjusted more frequently if Mississippi Power and the MPUS or the Mississippi PSC deem the change appropriate. The property damage reserve accrual will be the difference between the approved SRR revenues and the SRR revenue requirement, excluding any accrual to the reserve. In addition, SRR allows Mississippi Power to set up a regulatory asset, pending review, if the allowable actual retail property damage costs exceed the amount in the retail property damage reserve. Mississippi Power made retail accruals of $1 million, $3 million, and $4 million for 2018, 2017, and 2016, respectively. Mississippi Power also accrued $0.3 million annually in 2018, 2017, and 2016 for the wholesale jurisdiction. As of December 31, 2018, the property damage reserve balances were $55 million and $1 million for retail and wholesale, respectively.
Based on Mississippi Power's annual SRR rate filings, the SRR rate was zero for all years presented and Mississippi Power accrued $2 million, $4 million, and $3 million to the property damage reserve in 2018, 2017, and 2016, respectively. The SRR rate filings were suspended by the Mississippi PSC for review for a period not to exceed 120 days from their respective filing dates, after which the filings became effective.
In January 2017, a tornado caused extensive damage to Mississippi Power's transmission and distribution infrastructure. The cost of storm damage repairs was approximately $9 million. A portion of these costs was charged to the retail property damage reserve and addressed in the 2018 SRR rate filing.
Kemper County Energy Facility
Overview
The Kemper County energy facility was designed to utilize IGCC technology with an expected output capacity of 582 MWs and to be fueled by locally mined lignite (an abundant, lower heating value coal) from a mine owned by Mississippi Power and situated adjacent to the Kemper County energy facility. The mine, operated by North American Coal Corporation, started commercial operation in 2013. In connection with the Kemper County energy facility construction, Mississippi Power constructed approximately 61 miles of CO2 pipeline infrastructure for the transport of captured CO2 for use in enhanced oil recovery.
Schedule and Cost Estimate
In 2012, the Mississippi PSC issued an order (2012 MPSC CPCN Order), confirming the CPCN originally approved by the Mississippi PSC in 2010 authorizing the acquisition, construction, and operation of the Kemper County energy facility. The certificated cost estimate of the Kemper County energy facility included in the 2012 MPSC CPCN Order was $2.4 billion, net of approximately $0.57 billion for the cost of the lignite mine and equipment, the cost of the CO2 pipeline facilities, AFUDC, and certain general exceptions (Cost Cap Exceptions). The 2012 MPSC CPCN Order approved a construction cost cap of up to $2.88 billion, with recovery of prudently-incurred costs subject to approval by the Mississippi PSC. The Kemper County energy facility was originally projected to be placed in service in May 2014. Mississippi Power placed the combined cycle and the associated common facilities portion of the Kemper County energy facility in service in August 2014. The combined cycle and associated common facilities portions of the Kemper County energy facility were dedicated as Plant Ratcliffe on April 27, 2018.
On June 21, 2017, the Mississippi PSC stated its intent to issue an order, which occurred on July 6, 2017, directing Mississippi Power to pursue a settlement under which the Kemper County energy facility would be operated as a natural gas plant, rather than an IGCC plant, and address all issues associated with the Kemper County energy facility. The order established a new docket for the purpose of pursuing a global settlement of the related costs (Kemper Settlement Docket). On June 28, 2017, Mississippi

COMBINED NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)
Southern Company and Subsidiary Companies 2018 Annual Report

Power notified the Mississippi PSC that it would begin a process to suspend operations and start-up activities on the gasifier portion of the Kemper County energy facility, given the uncertainty as to its future.
At the time of project suspension in June 2017, the total cost estimate for the Kemper County energy facility was approximately $7.38 billion, including approximately $5.95 billion of costs subject to the construction cost cap, and was net of the $137 million in additional grants from the DOE received in April 2016. In the aggregate, Mississippi Power had recorded charges to income of $3.07 billion ($1.89 billion after tax) as a result of changes in the cost estimate above the cost cap for the Kemper IGCC through May 31, 2017.
Given the Mississippi PSC's stated intent regarding no further rate increase for the Kemper County energy facility and the subsequent suspension, cost recovery of the gasifier portions became no longer probable; therefore, Mississippi Power recorded an additional charge to income in June 2017 of $2.8 billion ($2.0 billion after tax), which included estimated costs associated with the gasification portions of the plant and lignite mine. During the third and fourth quarters of 2017, Mississippi Power recorded charges to income of $242 million ($206 million after tax), including $164 million for ongoing project costs, estimated mine and gasifier-related costs, and certain termination costs during the suspension period prior to conclusion of the Kemper Settlement Docket, as well as the charge associated with the Kemper Settlement Agreement discussed below.
In 2018, Mississippi Power recorded pre-tax charges to income of $37 million ($27 million after tax), primarily resulting from the abandonment and related closure activities and ongoing period costs, net of sales proceeds, for the mine and gasifier-related assets at the Kemper County energy facility. In addition, Mississippi Power recorded a credit to earnings of $95 million in the fourth quarter 2018 primarily resulting from the reduction of a valuation allowance for a state income tax NOL carryforward associated with the Kemper County energy facility. Additional closure costs for the mine and gasifier-related assets, currently estimated at up to $10 million pre-tax (excluding salvage, net of dismantlement costs), may be incurred through the first half of 2020. In addition, period costs, including, but not limited to, costs for compliance and safety, ARO accretion, and property taxes for the mine and gasifier-related assets, are estimated to total $11 million in 2019 and $2 million to $4 million annually in 2020 through 2023. Mississippi Power is currently evaluating its options regarding the final disposition of the CO2 pipeline, including removal of the pipeline. This evaluation is expected to be complete later in 2019. If Mississippi Power ultimately decides to remove the CO2 pipeline, the cost of removal would have a material impact on Mississippi Power's financial statements and could have a material impact on Southern Company's financial statements. The ultimate outcome of these matters cannot be determined at this time.
See Note 10 for additional information.
Rate Recovery
Kemper Settlement Agreement
In 2015, the Mississippi PSC issued an order (In-Service Asset Rate Order) regarding the Kemper County energy facility assets that were commercially operational and providing service to customers (the transmission facilities, combined cycle, natural gas pipeline, and water pipeline) and other related costs. The In-Service Asset Rate Order provided for retail rate recovery of an annual revenue requirement of approximately $126 million which went into effect on December 17, 2015.
On February 6, 2018, the Mississippi PSC voted to approve a settlement agreement related to cost recovery for the Kemper County energy facility among Mississippi Power, the MPUS, and certain intervenors (Kemper Settlement Agreement), which resolved all cost recovery issues, modified the CPCN to limit the Kemper County energy facility to natural gas combined cycle operation, and provided for an annual revenue requirement of approximately $99.3 million for costs related to the Kemper County energy facility, which included the impact of the Tax Reform Legislation. The revenue requirement is based on (i) a fixed ROE for 2018 of 8.6% excluding any performance adjustment, (ii) a ROE for 2019 calculated in accordance with PEP, excluding the performance adjustment, (iii) for future years, a performance-based ROE calculated pursuant to PEP, and (iv) amortization periods for the related regulatory assets and liabilities of eight years and six years, respectively. The revenue requirement also reflects a disallowance related to a portion of Mississippi Power's investment in the Kemper County energy facility requested for inclusion in rate base, which was recorded in the fourth quarter 2017 as an additional charge to income of approximately $78 million ($85 million net of accumulated depreciation of $7 million) pre-tax ($48 million after tax).
Under the Kemper Settlement Agreement, retail customer rates reflect a reduction of approximately $26.8 million annually, effective with the first billing cycle of April 2018, and include no recovery for costs associated with the gasifier portion of the Kemper County energy facility in 2018 or at any future date.
Reserve Margin Plan
On August 6, 2018, Mississippi Power filed its proposed Reserve Margin Plan (RMP), as required by the Mississippi PSC's order in the Kemper Settlement Docket. Under the RMP, Mississippi Power proposed alternatives that would reduce its reserve margin,

COMBINED NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)
Southern Company and Subsidiary Companies 2018 Annual Report

with the most economic of the alternatives being the two-year and seven-year acceleration of the retirement of Plant Watson Units 4 and 5, respectively, to the first quarter 2022 and the four-year acceleration of the retirement of Plant Greene County Units 1 and 2 to the third quarter 2021 and the third quarter 2022, respectively, in order to lower or avoid operating costs. The Plant Greene County unit retirements would require the completion by Alabama Power of proposed transmission and system reliability improvements, as well as agreement by Alabama Power. The RMP filing also states that, in the event the Mississippi PSC ultimately approves an alternative that includes an accelerated retirement, Mississippi Power would require authorization to defer in a regulatory asset for future recovery the remaining net book value of the units at the time of retirement. A decision by the Mississippi PSC that does not include recovery of the remaining book value of any generating units retired could have a material impact on Mississippi Power's and Southern Company's financial statements. The ultimate outcome of this matter cannot be determined at this time.
Lignite Mine and CO2 Pipeline Facilities
Mississippi Power owns the lignite mine and equipment and mineral reserves located around the Kemper County energy facility site. The mine started commercial operation in June 2013.
In 2010, Mississippi Power executed a 40-year management fee contract with Liberty Fuels Company, LLC (Liberty Fuels), a wholly-owned subsidiary of The North American Coal Corporation, which developed, constructed, and is responsible for the mining operations through the end of the mine reclamation. As the mining permit holder, Liberty Fuels has a legal obligation to perform mine reclamation and Mississippi Power has a contractual obligation to fund all reclamation activities. As a result of the abandonment of the Kemper IGCC, final mine reclamation began in 2018 and is expected to be substantially completed in 2020, with monitoring expected to continue through 2027. See Note 6 and Note 7 under "Mississippi Power" for additional information.
In addition, Mississippi Power constructed the CO2 pipeline for the planned transport of captured CO2 for use in enhanced oil recovery and entered into an agreement with Denbury Onshore (Denbury) to purchase the captured CO2. The agreement with Denbury was terminated in December 2018 and did not have a material impact on Southern Company's or Mississippi Power's results of operations. Mississippi Power is currently evaluating its options regarding the final disposition of the CO2 pipeline, including removal of the pipeline. This evaluation is expected to be complete later in 2019. If Mississippi Power ultimately decides to remove the CO2 pipeline, the cost of removal would have a material impact on Mississippi Power's financial statements and could have a material impact on Southern Company's financial statements. The ultimate outcome of this matter cannot be determined at this time.
Government Grants
In 2010, the DOE, through a cooperative agreement with SCS, agreed to fund $270 million of the Kemper County energy facility through the grants awarded to the project by the DOE under the Clean Coal Power Initiative Round 2. Through December 31, 2018, Mississippi Power received total DOE grants of $387 million, of which $382 million reduced the construction costs of the Kemper County energy facility and $5 million reimbursed Mississippi Power for expenses associated with DOE reporting. On December 12, 2018, Mississippi Power filed with the DOE its request for property closeout certification under the contract related to the grants received. Mississippi Power and the DOE are currently in discussions regarding the requested closeout and property disposition, which may require payment to the DOE for a portion of certain property that is to be retained by Mississippi Power. The ultimate outcome of this matter cannot be determined at this time; however, it could have a material impact on Mississippi Power's financial statements and a significant impact on Southern Company's financial statements.

COMBINED NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)
Southern Company and Subsidiary Companies 2018 Annual Report

Southern Company Gas
Regulatory Assets and Liabilities
Regulatory assets and (liabilities) reflected in the balance sheets of Southern Company Gas at December 31, 2018 and 2017 relate to:
 2018 2017 Note
 (in millions)  
Environmental remediation$311
 $410
 (a,b)
Retiree benefit plans161
 270
 (a,c)
Long-term debt fair value adjustment121
 138
 (d)
Under recovered regulatory clause revenues90
 98
 (e)
Other regulatory assets59
 79
 (f)
Other cost of removal obligations(1,585) (1,646) (g)
Deferred income tax credits(940) (1,063) (g,i)
Over recovered regulatory clause revenues(43) (144) (e)
Other regulatory liabilities(46) (21) (h)
Total regulatory assets (liabilities), net$(1,872) $(1,879)  
Note: Unless otherwise noted, the recovery and amortization periods for these regulatory assets and (liabilities) have been approved or accepted by the relevant state PSC or other regulatory body and are as follows:
(a)Not earning a return as offset in rate base by a corresponding asset or liability.
(b)Recovered through environmental cost recovery mechanisms when the remediation is performed or the work is performed.
(c)Recovered and amortized over the average remaining service period which range up to 15 years. See Note 11 for additional information.
(d)Recovered over the remaining life of the original debt issuances, which range up to 20 years.
(e)Recorded and recovered or amortized over periods generally not exceeding seven years. In addition to natural gas cost recovery mechanisms, the natural gas distribution utilities are authorized to utilize other cost recovery mechanisms, such as regulatory riders, which vary by utility but allow recovery of certain costs, such as those related to infrastructure replacement programs, as well as environmental remediation and energy efficiency plans.
(f)Comprised of several components including unamortized loss on reacquired debt, weather normalization, franchise gas, deferred depreciation, and financial instrument-hedging assets, which are recovered or amortized over periods generally not exceeding 10 years, except for financial hedging-instruments. Financial instrument-hedging assets are recorded over the life of the underlying hedged purchase contracts, which generally do not exceed two years. Upon final settlement, actual costs incurred are recovered, and actual income earned is refunded through the energy cost recovery clause.
(g)Other cost of removal obligations are recorded and deferred income tax liabilities are amortized over the related property lives, which may range up to 80 years. Cost of removal liabilities will be settled and trued up following completion of the related activities.
(h)
Comprised of several components including amounts to be refunded to customers as a result of the Tax Reform Legislation, energy efficiency programs, and unamortized bond issuance costs and financial instrument-hedging liabilities which are recovered or amortized over periods generally not exceeding 20 years, except for financial hedging-instruments. Financial instrument-hedging liabilities are recorded over the life of the underlying hedged purchase contracts, which generally do not exceed two years. Upon final settlement, actual costs incurred are recovered, and actual income earned is refunded through the energy cost recovery clause. See "Rate Proceedings" herein for additional information regarding customer refunds resulting from the Tax Reform Legislation.
(i)
Includes excess deferred income tax liabilities not subject to normalization as a result of the Tax Reform Legislation, the recovery and amortization of which is expected to be determined by the applicable state regulatory agencies in future rate proceedings. See "Rate Proceedings" herein and Note 10 for additional details.
Infrastructure Replacement Programs and Capital Projects
In addition to capital expenditures recovered through base rates by each of the natural gas distribution utilities, Nicor Gas and Virginia Natural Gas have separate rate riders that provide timely recovery of capital expenditures for specific infrastructure replacement programs. Descriptions of the infrastructure replacement programs and capital projects at the natural gas distribution utilities follow:
Nicor Gas
In 2013, Illinois enacted legislation that allows Nicor Gas to provide more widespread safety and reliability enhancements to its distribution system. The legislation stipulates that rate increases to customers as a result of any infrastructure investments shall not exceed a cumulative annual average of 4.0% or, in any given year, 5.5% of base rate revenues. In 2014, the Illinois Commission approved the nine-year regulatory infrastructure program, Investing in Illinois, subject to annual review. In conjunction with the base rate case order issued by the Illinois Commission on January 31, 2018, Nicor Gas is recovering program costs incurred prior to December 31, 2017 through base rates. Nicor Gas has requested that the program costs incurred

COMBINED NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)
Southern Company and Subsidiary Companies 2018 Annual Report

subsequent to December 31, 2017, which are currently being recovered through a separate rider, be addressed in the base rate case filed November 9, 2018. See "Rate Proceedings" herein for additional information.
Virginia Natural Gas
In 2012, the Virginia Commission approved the Steps to Advance Virginia's Energy (SAVE) program, an accelerated infrastructure replacement program, to be completed over a five-year period. In 2016, the Virginia Commission approved an extension to the SAVE program for Virginia Natural Gas to replace more than 200 miles of aging pipeline infrastructure and invest up to $30 million in 2016 and up to $35 million annually through 2021.
The SAVE program is subject to annual review by the Virginia Commission. In conjunction with the base rate case order issued by the Virginia Commission in December 2017, Virginia Natural Gas is recovering program costs incurred prior to September 1, 2017 through base rates. Program costs incurred subsequent to September 1, 2017 are currently recovered through a separate rider and are subject to future base rate case proceedings.
Atlanta Gas Light
GRAM
In February 2017, the Georgia PSC approved GRAM and a $20 million increase in annual base rate revenues for Atlanta Gas Light, effective March 1, 2017. GRAM adjusts base rates annually, up or down, using an earnings band based on the previously approved ROE of 10.75% and does not collect revenue through special riders and surcharges. Atlanta Gas Light adjusts rates up to the lower end of the band of 10.55% and adjusts rates down to the higher end of the band of 10.95%. Various infrastructure programs previously authorized by the Georgia PSC under Atlanta Gas Light's STRIDE program including the Integrated Vintage Plastic Replacement Program to replace aging plastic pipe and the Integrated System Reinforcement Program to upgrade Atlanta Gas Light's distribution system and LNG facilities in Georgia continue under GRAM and the recovery of and return on the infrastructure program investments are included in annual base rate adjustments. The Georgia PSC reviews Atlanta Gas Light's performance annually under GRAM. See Rate Proceedings" herein for additional information.
Pursuant to the GRAM approval, Atlanta Gas Light and the staff of the Georgia PSC agreed to a variation of the Integrated Customer Growth Program to extend pipeline facilities to serve customers in areas without pipeline access and create new economic development opportunities in Georgia, which was formerly part of the STRIDE program. As a result, a new tariff was created, effective October 10, 2017, to provide up to $15 million annually for Atlanta Gas Light to commit to strategic economic development projects. Projects under this tariff must be approved by the Georgia PSC.
The orders for the STRIDE program provide for recovery of all prudent costs incurred in the performance of the program. Atlanta Gas Light will recover from end-use customers, through billings to Marketers, the costs related to the program, net of any related cost savings. The regulatory asset represents incurred program costs that will be collected through GRAM. The future expected costs to be recovered through rates related to allowed, but not incurred, costs are recognized in an unrecognized ratemaking amount that is not reflected on the balance sheets. This allowed cost is primarily the equity return on the capital investment under the program. See "Unrecognized Ratemaking Amounts"herein for additional information.
Atlanta Gas Light capitalizes and depreciates the capital expenditure costs incurred from the STRIDE programs over the life of the assets. Operations and maintenance costs are expensed as incurred. Recoveries, which are recorded as revenue, are based on a formula that allows Atlanta Gas Light to recover operations and maintenance costs in excess of those included in its current base rates, depreciation, and an allowed rate of return on capital expenditures. However, Atlanta Gas Light is allowed the recovery of carrying costs on the under recovered balance resulting from the timing difference.
PRP
In 2015, Atlanta Gas Light began recovering incremental PRP surcharge amounts through three phased-in increases in addition to its already existing PRP surcharge amount, which was established to address recovery of the under recovered PRP balance of $144 million and the estimated amounts to be earned under the program through 2025. The unrecovered balance is the result of the continued revenue requirement earned under the program offset by the existing and incremental PRP surcharges. The under recovered balance at December 31, 2018 was $171 million, including $95 million of unrecognized equity return. The PRP surcharge will remain in effect until the earlier of the full recovery of the under recovered amount or December 31, 2025. See "Rate Proceedings" and "Unrecognized Ratemaking Amounts" herein for additional information.
One of the capital projects under the PRP experienced construction issues and Atlanta Gas Light was required to complete mitigation work prior to placing it in service. These mitigation costs were included in base rates in 2018. In 2017, Atlanta Gas Light recovered $20 million from the settlement of contractor litigation claims and recovered an additional $7 million from the

COMBINED NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)
Southern Company and Subsidiary Companies 2018 Annual Report

final settlement of contractor litigation claims during the first quarter 2018. Mitigation costs recovered through the legal process are retained by Atlanta Gas Light.
Natural Gas Cost Recovery
With the exception of Atlanta Gas Light, the natural gas distribution utilities are authorized by the relevant regulatory agencies in the states in which they serve to use natural gas cost recovery mechanisms that adjust rates to reflect changes in the wholesale cost of natural gas and ensure recovery of all costs prudently incurred in purchasing natural gas for customers. Natural gas cost recovery revenues are adjusted for differences in actual recoverable natural gas costs and amounts billed in current regulated rates. Changes in the billing factor will not have a significant effect on Southern Company's or Southern Company Gas' revenues or net income, but will affect cash flows.
Rate Proceedings
Nicor Gas
On January 31, 2018, the Illinois Commission approved a $137 million increase in annual base rate revenues, including $93 million related to the recovery of investments under the Investing in Illinois program, effective February 8, 2018, based on a ROE of 9.8%.
On April 19, 2018, the Illinois Commission approved Nicor Gas' variable income tax adjustment rider. This rider provides for refund or recovery of changes in income tax expense that result from income tax rates that differ from those used in Nicor Gas' last rate case. Customer refunds, via bill credits, related to the impacts of the Tax Reform Legislation from January 25, 2018 through May 4, 2018 began on July 1, 2018 and are expected to conclude in the second quarter 2019.
On May 2, 2018, the Illinois Commission approved Nicor Gas' rehearing request for revised base rates to incorporate the reduction in the federal income tax rate as a result of the Tax Reform Legislation. The resulting decrease of approximately $44 million in annual base rate revenues became effective May 5, 2018. Nicor Gas' previously-authorized capital structure and ROE of 9.80% were not addressed in the rehearing and remain unchanged.
On November 9, 2018, Nicor Gas filed a general base rate case with the Illinois Commission requesting a $230 million increase in annual base rate revenues. The requested increase is based on a projected test year for the 12-month period ending September 30, 2020, a ROE of 10.6%, and an increase in the equity ratio from 52.0% to 54.0% to address the negative cash flow and credit metric impacts of the Tax Reform Legislation. The Illinois Commission is expected to rule on the requested increase within the 11-month statutory time limit, after which rate adjustments will be effective. The ultimate outcome of this matter cannot be determined at this time.
Atlanta Gas Light
On February 23, 2018, Atlanta Gas Light revised its annual base rate filing to reflect the impacts of the Tax Reform Legislation and requested a $16 million rate reduction in 2018. On May 15, 2018, the Georgia PSC approved a stipulation for Atlanta Gas Light's annual base rates to remain at the 2017 level for 2018 and 2019, with customer credits of $8 million in each of July 2018 and October 2018 to reflect the impacts of the Tax Reform Legislation. The Georgia PSC maintained Atlanta Gas Light's previously authorized earnings band based on a ROE between 10.55% and 10.95% and increased the allowed equity ratio by 4% to an equity ratio of 55% to address the negative cash flow and credit metric impacts of the Tax Reform Legislation. Additionally, Atlanta Gas Light is required to file a traditional base rate case on or before June 1, 2019 for rates effective January 1, 2020.
Atlanta Gas Light's recovery of the previously unrecovered PRP revenue through 2014, as well as the mitigation costs associated with the PRP that were not previously included in its rates, were included in GRAM. In connection with the GRAM approval, the last monthly PRP surcharge increase became effective March 1, 2017.
Virginia Natural Gas
On December 21, 2017, the Virginia Commission approved a settlement for a $34 million increase in annual base rate revenues, effective September 1, 2017, including $13 million related to the recovery of investments under the SAVE program. See "Regulatory Infrastructure Programs" herein for additional information. An authorized ROE range of 9.0% to 10.0% with a midpoint of 9.5% will be used to determine the revenue requirement in any filing, other than for a change in base rates.
On December 17, 2018, the Virginia Commission approved Virginia Natural Gas' annual information form filing, which reduced annual base rates by $14 million effective January 1, 2019 due to lower tax expense as a result of the lower corporate income tax rate and the impact of the flowback of excess deferred income taxes. This approval also requires Virginia Natural Gas to issue

COMBINED NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)
Southern Company and Subsidiary Companies 2018 Annual Report

customer refunds, via bill credits, for the entire $14 million which was deferred as a regulatory liability, current, on the balance sheet at December 31, 2018. These customer refunds are expected to be completed in the first quarter 2019.
energySMART
The Illinois Commission approved Nicor Gas' energySMART program, which includes energy efficiency program offerings and therm reduction goals. Through December 31, 2017, Nicor Gas spent $107 million of the initial authorized expenditure of $113 million. A new program began on January 1, 2018, with an additional authorized expenditure of $160 million through 2021. Through December 31, 2018, Nicor Gas had spent $29 million.
Unrecognized Ratemaking Amounts
The following table illustrates Southern Company Gas' authorized ratemaking amounts that are not recognized on its balance sheets. These amounts are primarily composed of an allowed equity rate of return on assets associated with certain regulatory infrastructure programs. These amounts will be recognized as revenues in Southern Company Gas' financial statements in the periods they are billable to customers, the majority of which will be recovered by 2025.
 December 31, 2018 December 31, 2017
 (in millions)
Atlanta Gas Light$95
 $104
Virginia Natural Gas11
 11
Nicor Gas4
 2
Total$110
 $117
FERC Matters
Open Access Transmission Tariff
On May 10, 2018, AMEA and Cooperative Energy filed with the FERC a complaint against SCS and the traditional electric operating companies claiming that the current 11.25% base ROE used in calculating the annual transmission revenue requirements of the traditional electric operating companies' open access transmission tariff is unjust and unreasonable as measured by the applicable FERC standards. The complaint requested that the base ROE be set no higher than 8.65% and that the FERC order refunds for the difference in revenue requirements that results from applying a just and reasonable ROE established in this proceeding upon determining the current ROE is unjust and unreasonable. On June 18, 2018, SCS and the traditional electric operating companies filed their response challenging the adequacy of the showing presented by the complainants and offering support for the current ROE. On September 6, 2018, the FERC issued an order establishing a refund effective date of May 10, 2018 in the event a refund is due and initiating an investigation and settlement procedures regarding the current base ROE. Through December 31, 2018, the estimated maximum potential refund is not expected to be material to Southern Company's or the traditional electric operating companies' results of operations or cash flows. The ultimate outcome of this matter cannot be determined at this time.
Mississippi Power
Municipal and Rural Associations Tariff
Mississippi Power provides wholesale electric service to Cooperative Energy, East Mississippi Electric Power Association, and the City of Collins, all located in southeastern Mississippi, under a long-term cost-based, FERC-regulated MRA tariff.
In 2016, Mississippi Power reached a settlement agreement with its wholesale customers, which was subsequently approved by the FERC, for an increase in wholesale base revenues under the MRA cost-based electric tariff, primarily as a result of placing scrubbers for Plant Daniel Units 1 and 2 in service in 2015. The settlement agreement became effective for services rendered beginning May 1, 2016, resulting in an estimated annual revenue increase of $7 million under the MRA cost-based electric tariff. Additionally, under the settlement agreement, the tariff customers agreed to similar regulatory treatment for MRA tariff ratemaking as the treatment approved for retail ratemaking under the In-Service Asset Rate Order. This regulatory treatment primarily included (i) recovery of the operational Kemper County energy facility assets providing service to customers and other related costs, (ii) amortization of the Kemper County energy facility-related regulatory assets included in rates under the settlement agreement over the 36 months ending April 30, 2019, (iii) Kemper County energy facility-related expenses included in rates under the settlement agreement no longer being deferred and charged to expense, and (iv) removing all of the Kemper

COMBINED NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)
Southern Company and Subsidiary Companies 2018 Annual Report

County energy facility CWIP from rate base with a corresponding increase in accrual of AFUDC, which totaled approximately $22 million through the suspension of Kemper IGCC start-up activities.
Mississippi Power expects to reach a subsequent settlement agreement with its wholesale customers and will make a filing with the FERC during the first quarter 2019. The settlement agreement is intended to be consistent with the Kemper Settlement Agreement, including the impact of the Tax Reform Legislation. The ultimate outcome of this matter cannot be determined at this time.
In September 2017, Mississippi Power and Cooperative Energy executed a Shared Service Agreement (SSA), as part of the MRA tariff, under which Mississippi Power and Cooperative Energy will share in providing electricity to all Cooperative Energy delivery points, in lieu of the current arrangement under which each delivery point is specifically assigned to either entity. The SSA accepted by the FERC in October 2017 became effective on January 1, 2018 and may be cancelled by Cooperative Energy with 10 years notice after December 31, 2020. The SSA provides Cooperative Energy the option to decrease its use of Mississippi Power's generation services under the MRA tariff, subject to annual and cumulative caps and a one-year notice requirement. In the event Cooperative Energy elects to reduce these services, the related reduction in Mississippi Power's revenues is not expected to be significant through 2020.
Fuel Cost Recovery
Mississippi Power has a wholesale MRA and a Market Based (MB) fuel cost recovery factor. Effective with the first billing cycle for January 2018, fuel rates increased $11 million annually for wholesale MRA customers and $1 million annually for wholesale MB customers. Effective January 1, 2019, the wholesale MRA fuel rate decreased $16 million annually and the wholesale MB fuel rate decreased by an immaterial amount. At December 31, 2018, over recovered wholesale MRA fuel costs included in other regulatory liabilities, current on the balance sheet were approximately $6 million compared to an immaterial amount at December 31, 2017. Under recovered wholesale MB fuel costs included in the balance sheets were immaterial at December 31, 2018 and 2017.
Mississippi Power's operating revenues are adjusted for differences in actual recoverable fuel cost and amounts billed in accordance with the currently approved cost recovery rate. Accordingly, changes in the billing factor should have no significant effect on Mississippi Power's revenues or net income, but will affect cash flow.
Southern Company Gas
At December 31, 2018, Southern Company Gas was involved in two gas pipeline construction projects. These projects, along with Southern Company Gas' existing pipelines, are intended to provide diverse sources of natural gas supplies to customers, resolve current and long-term supply planning for new capacity, enhance system reliability, and generate economic development in the areas served.
On January 19, 2018, the PennEast Pipeline received FERC approval. Work continues with state and federal agencies to obtain the required permits to begin construction. Any material delays may impact forecasted capital expenditures and the expected in-service date.
In October 2017, the Atlantic Coast Pipeline received FERC approval. This joint venture has experienced challenges to its permits since construction began in 2018. During the third and fourth quarters 2018, a FERC stop work order, together with delays in obtaining permits necessary for construction and construction delays due to judicial actions, impacted the cost and schedule for the project. As a result, total project cost estimates have increased from between $6.0 billion and $6.5 billion to between $7.0 billion and $7.8 billion, excluding financing costs. Southern Company Gas' share of the total project costs is 5% and Southern Company Gas' investment at December 31, 2018 totaled $83 million. The operator of the joint venture currently expects to achieve a late 2020 in-service date for at least key segments of the Atlantic Coast Pipeline, while the remainder may extend into early 2021. Southern Company Gas has evaluated the recoverability of its investment and determined there was no impairment as of December 31, 2018. Abnormal weather, work delays (including due to judicial or regulatory action), and other conditions may result in additional cost or schedule modifications, which could result in an impairment of Southern Company Gas' investment and could have a material impact on Southern Company's and Southern Company Gas' financial statements.
The ultimate outcome of these matters cannot be determined at this time. See Notes 7 and 9 under "Southern Company GasEquity Method Investments" and "Guarantees," respectively, for additional information on these pipeline projects.

COMBINED NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)
Southern Company and Subsidiary Companies 2018 Annual Report

3. CONTINGENCIES
General Litigation Matters
Each registrant is subject to certain claims and legal actions arising in the ordinary course of business. In addition, the business activities of Southern Company's subsidiaries are subject to extensive governmental regulation related to public health and the environment, such as laws and regulations governing air, water, land, and protection of other natural resources. Litigation over environmental issues and claims of various types, including property damage, personal injury, common law nuisance, and citizen enforcement of environmental laws and regulations has occurred throughout the U.S. This litigation has included claims for damages alleged to have been caused by CO2 and other emissions, CCR, and alleged exposure to hazardous materials, and/or requests for injunctive relief in connection with such matters.
The ultimate outcome of such pending or potential litigation against each registrant and any subsidiaries cannot be predicted at this time; however, for current proceedings not specifically reported herein, management does not anticipate that the ultimate liabilities, if any, arising from such current proceedings would have a material effect on such registrant's financial statements.
Southern Company
In January 2017, a putative securities class action complaint was filed against Southern Company, certain of its officers, and certain former Mississippi Power officers in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Georgia, Atlanta Division, by Monroe County Employees' Retirement System on behalf of all persons who purchased shares of Southern Company's common stock between April 25, 2012 and October 29, 2013. The complaint alleges that Southern Company, certain of its officers, and certain former Mississippi Power officers made materially false and misleading statements regarding the Kemper County energy facility in violation of certain provisions under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. The complaint seeks, among other things, compensatory damages and litigation costs and attorneys' fees. In June 2017, the plaintiffs filed an amended complaint that provided additional detail about their claims, increased the purported class period by one day, and added certain other former Mississippi Power officers as defendants. In July 2017, the defendants filed a motion to dismiss the plaintiffs' amended complaint with prejudice, to which the plaintiffs filed an opposition in September 2017. On March 29, 2018, the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Georgia, Atlanta Division, issued an order granting, in part, the defendants' motion to dismiss. The court dismissed certain claims against certain officers of Southern Company and Mississippi Power and dismissed the allegations related to a number of the statements that plaintiffs challenged as being false or misleading. On April 26, 2018, the defendants filed a motion for reconsideration of the court's order, seeking dismissal of the remaining claims in the lawsuit. On August 10, 2018, the court denied the motion for reconsideration and denied a motion to certify the issue for interlocutory appeal.
In February 2017, Jean Vineyard filed a shareholder derivative lawsuit and, in May 2017, Judy Mesirov filed a shareholder derivative lawsuit, each in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Georgia. Each of these lawsuits names as defendants Southern Company, certain of its directors, certain of its officers, and certain former Mississippi Power officers. In August 2017, these two shareholder derivative lawsuits were consolidated in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Georgia. The complaints allege that the defendants caused Southern Company to make false or misleading statements regarding the Kemper County energy facility cost and schedule. Further, the complaints allege that the defendants were unjustly enriched and caused the waste of corporate assets and also allege that the individual defendants violated their fiduciary duties. Each plaintiff seeks to recover, on behalf of Southern Company, unspecified actual damages and, on each plaintiff's own behalf, attorneys' fees and costs in bringing the lawsuit. Each plaintiff also seeks certain changes to Southern Company's corporate governance and internal processes. On April 25, 2018, the court entered an order staying this lawsuit until 30 days after the resolution of any dispositive motions or any settlement, whichever is earlier, in the putative securities class action.
In May 2017, Helen E. Piper Survivor's Trust filed a shareholder derivative lawsuit in the Superior Court of Gwinnett County, State of Georgia that names as defendants Southern Company, certain of its directors, certain of its officers, and certain former Mississippi Power officers. The complaint alleges that the individual defendants, among other things, breached their fiduciary duties in connection with schedule delays and cost overruns associated with the construction of the Kemper County energy facility. The complaint further alleges that the individual defendants authorized or failed to correct false and misleading statements regarding the Kemper County energy facility schedule and cost and failed to implement necessary internal controls to prevent harm to Southern Company. The plaintiff seeks to recover, on behalf of Southern Company, unspecified actual damages and disgorgement of profits and, on its behalf, attorneys' fees and costs in bringing the lawsuit. The plaintiff also seeks certain unspecified changes to Southern Company's corporate governance and internal processes. On May 4, 2018, the court entered an order staying this lawsuit until 30 days after the resolution of any dispositive motions or any settlement, whichever is earlier, in the putative securities class action.

COMBINED NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)
Southern Company and Subsidiary Companies 2018 Annual Report

Southern Company believes these legal challenges have no merit; however, an adverse outcome in any of these proceedings could have an impact on Southern Company's results of operations, financial condition, and liquidity. Southern Company will vigorously defend itself in these matters, the ultimate outcome of which cannot be determined at this time.
Alabama Power
On March 2, 2018, the Alabama Department of Environmental Management (ADEM) issued proposed administrative orders assessing a penalty of $1.25 million to Alabama Power for unpermitted discharge of fluids and/or pollutants to groundwater at five electric generating plants. The orders were finalized and Alabama Power paid the penalty on September 27, 2018. This matter is now concluded.
Georgia Power
In 2011, plaintiffs filed a putative class action against Georgia Power in the Superior Court of Fulton County, Georgia alleging that Georgia Power's collection in rates of amounts for municipal franchise fees (which fees are paid to municipalities) exceeded the amounts allowed in orders of the Georgia PSC and alleging certain state tort law claims. In 2016, the Georgia Court of Appeals reversed the trial court's previous dismissal of the case and remanded the case to the trial court. Georgia Power filed a petition for writ of certiorari with the Georgia Supreme Court, which was granted in August 2017. On June 18, 2018, the Georgia Supreme Court affirmed the judgment of the Georgia Court of Appeals and remanded the case to the trial court for further proceedings. Following a motion by Georgia Power, on February 13, 2019, the Superior Court of Fulton County entered an order staying this lawsuit for 60 days and ordered the parties to submit petitions to the Georgia PSC within 20 days for a declaratory ruling to address certain terms the court previously held were ambiguous as used in the Georgia PSC's orders. The order entered by the Superior Court of Fulton County also conditionally certified the proposed class. Georgia Power believes the plaintiffs' claims have no merit and will continue to vigorously defend itself in this matter. The amount of any possible losses cannot be calculated at this time because, among other factors, it is unknown whether conditional class certification will be upheld and the ultimate composition of any class; and whether any losses would be subject to recovery from any municipalities. The ultimate outcome of this matter cannot be determined at this time.
Mississippi Power
In 2016, a complaint against Mississippi Power was filed in Harrison County Circuit Court (Circuit Court) by Biloxi Freezing & Processing Inc., Gulfside Casino Partnership, and John Carlton Dean, which was amended and refiled to include, among other things, Southern Company as a defendant. The individual plaintiff alleged that Mississippi Power and Southern Company violated the Mississippi Unfair Trade Practices Act. All plaintiffs alleged that Mississippi Power and Southern Company concealed, falsely represented, and failed to fully disclose important facts concerning the cost and schedule of the Kemper County energy facility and that these alleged breaches unjustly enriched Mississippi Power and Southern Company. The plaintiffs sought unspecified actual damages and punitive damages; asked the Circuit Court to appoint a receiver to oversee, operate, manage, and otherwise control all affairs relating to the Kemper County energy facility; asked the Circuit Court to revoke any licenses or certificates authorizing Mississippi Power or Southern Company to engage in any business related to the Kemper County energy facility in Mississippi; and sought attorney's fees, costs, and interest. The plaintiffs also sought an injunction to prevent any Kemper County energy facility costs from being charged to customers through electric rates. In June 2017, the Circuit Court ruled in favor of motions by Southern Company and Mississippi Power and dismissed the case. In July 2017, the plaintiffs filed notice of an appeal. On July 13, 2018, Mississippi Power and Southern Company reached a settlement agreement with the plaintiffs and the plaintiffs' appeal was dismissed with prejudice. The settlement had no material impact on Southern Company's or Mississippi Power's financial statements.
On May 18, 2018, Southern Company and Mississippi Power received a notice of dispute and arbitration demand filed by Martin Product Sales, LLC (Martin) based on two agreements, both related to Kemper IGCC byproducts for which Mississippi Power provided termination notices in September 2017. Martin alleges breach of contract, breach of good faith and fair dealing, fraud and misrepresentation, and civil conspiracy and makes a claim for damages in the amount of approximately $143 million, as well as additional unspecified damages, attorney's fees, costs, and interest. In the first quarter 2019, Mississippi Power and Southern Company filed motions to dismiss. Southern Company and Mississippi Power believe this legal challenge has no merit; however, an adverse outcome in this proceeding could have a material impact on Southern Company's and Mississippi Power's results of operations, financial condition, and liquidity. Southern Company and Mississippi Power will vigorously defend themselves in this matter, the ultimate outcome of which cannot be determined at this time.
On November 21, 2018, Ray C. Turnage and 10 other individual plaintiffs filed a putative class action complaint against Mississippi Power and the three current members of the Mississippi PSC in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Mississippi. Mississippi Power received Mississippi PSC approval in 2013 to charge a mirror CWIP rate premised upon including

COMBINED NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)
Southern Company and Subsidiary Companies 2018 Annual Report

in its rate base pre-construction and construction costs for the Kemper IGCC prior to placing the Kemper IGCC into service. The Mississippi Supreme Court reversed that approval and ordered Mississippi Power to refund the amounts paid by customers under the previously-approved mirror CWIP rate. The plaintiffs allege that the initial approval process, and the amount approved, were improper. They also allege that Mississippi Power underpaid customers in the refund process because it applied the wrong interest rate to the payments. The plaintiffs seek to recover, on behalf of themselves and their putative class, actual damages, punitive damages, pre-judgment interest, post-judgment interest, attorney's fees, and costs. Mississippi Power believes this legal challenge has no merit; however, an adverse outcome in this proceeding could have a material impact on Mississippi Power's results of operations, financial condition, and liquidity. Mississippi Power will vigorously defend itself in this matter, the ultimate outcome of which cannot be determined at this time.
Southern Power
Southern Power indirectly owns a 51% membership interest in RE Roserock LLC (Roserock), the owner of the Roserock facility in Pecos County, Texas. Prior to the facility being placed in service in November 2016, certain solar panels were damaged during installation by the construction contractor, McCarthy Building Companies, Inc. (McCarthy), and certain solar panels were damaged by a hail event that also occurred during construction. In connection therewith, Southern Power is withholding payments of approximately $26 million from the construction contractor, which has placed a lien on the Roserock facility for the same amount. In May 2017, Roserock filed a lawsuit in the state district court in Pecos County, Texas, (State Court lawsuit) against XL Insurance America, Inc. (XL) and North American Elite Insurance Company (North American Elite) seeking recovery from an insurance policy for damages resulting from the hail storm and McCarthy's installation practices. On June 1, 2018, the court in the State Court lawsuit granted Roserock's motion for partial summary judgment, finding that the insurers were in breach of contract and in violation of the Texas Insurance Code for failing to pay any monies owed for the hail claim. In addition to the State Court lawsuit, lawsuits were filed between Roserock and McCarthy, as well as other parties, and that litigation has been consolidated in the U.S. District Court for the Western District of Texas. Southern Power intends to vigorously pursue and defend these matters, the ultimate outcome of which cannot be determined at this time.
Southern Company Gas
Nicor Energy Services Company, doing business as Pivotal Home Solutions, formerly a wholly-owned subsidiary of Southern Company Gas, was a defendant in a putative class action initially filed in 2017 in the state court in Indiana. The plaintiffs purported to represent a class of the customers who purchased products from Nicor Energy Services Company and alleged that the marketing, sale, and billing of the products violated the Indiana Consumer Fraud and Deceptive Business Practices Act, constituting common law fraud and resulting in unjust enrichment of these entities. In 2018, Nicor Energy Services Company was named in a second class action filed in the state court of Ohio asserting nearly identical allegations and legal claims. The plaintiffs sought, on behalf of the classes they purported to represent, actual and punitive damages, interest costs, attorney fees, and injunctive relief. To facilitate the sale of Pivotal Home Solutions, Southern Company Gas retained most of the financial responsibility for these lawsuits following the completion of the sale. On June 12, 2018, the parties settled these claims and Southern Company Gas recorded an $11 million charge, which is included in other operations and maintenance expenses for the year ended December 31, 2018.
Southern Company Gas is involved in litigation relating to an incident that occurred in one of its prior service territories that resulted in several deaths, injuries, and property damage. Southern Company Gas has resolved all claims for personal injuries or death, but it is continuing to defend litigation seeking to recover alleged property damages. Southern Company Gas has insurance that provides full coverage of the expected financial exposure in excess of $11 million per incident. During the successor period ended December 31, 2016, Southern Company Gas recorded reserves for substantially all of its potential exposure from these cases.
Environmental Remediation
The Southern Company system must comply with environmental laws and regulations governing the handling and disposal of waste and releases of hazardous substances. Under these various laws and regulations, the Southern Company system could incur substantial costs to clean up affected sites. The traditional electric operating companies and the natural gas distribution utilities conduct studies to determine the extent of any required cleanup and have recognized the estimated costs to clean up known impacted sites in the financial statements. A liability for environmental remediation costs is recognized only when a loss is determined to be probable and reasonably estimable. The traditional electric operating companies and the natural gas distribution utilities in Illinois and Georgia have each received authority from their respective state PSCs or other applicable state regulatory agencies to recover approved environmental compliance costs through regulatory mechanisms. These regulatory mechanisms are adjusted annually or as necessary within limits approved by the state PSCs or other applicable state regulatory agencies. At

COMBINED NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)
Southern Company and Subsidiary Companies 2018 Annual Report

December 31, 2018 and 2017, the environmental remediation liabilities of Alabama Power and Mississippi Power were immaterial.
Georgia Power has been designated or identified as a potentially responsible party at sites governed by the Georgia Hazardous Site Response Act and/or by the federal Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act, and assessment and potential cleanup of such sites is expected. In 2013, the Georgia PSC approved the 2013 ARP including the recovery of approximately $2 million annually through the ECCR tariff. Georgia Power recognizes a liability for environmental remediation costs only when it determines a loss is probable and reasonably estimable and reduces the reserve as expenditures are incurred. Any difference between the liabilities accrued and costs recovered through rates is deferred as a regulatory asset or liability. The annual recovery amount is expected to be adjusted as part of the Georgia Power 2019 Base Rate Case and further adjusted in future regulatory proceedings.
Southern Company Gas is subject to environmental remediation liabilities associated with 40 former MGP sites in four different states. Southern Company Gas' accrued environmental remediation liability at December 31, 2018 and 2017 was based on the estimated cost of environmental investigation and remediation associated with known current and former MGP operating sites. These environmental remediation expenditures are recoverable from customers through rate mechanisms approved by the applicable state regulatory agencies of the natural gas distribution utilities, with the exception of one site representing $2 million of the accrued remediation costs.
At December 31, 2018 and 2017, the environmental remediation liability and the balance of under recovered environmental remediation costs were reflected in the balance sheets as follows:
 Southern Company
Georgia
Power
Southern Company Gas
 (in millions)
December 31, 2018:   
Environmental remediation liability:   
Other current liabilities$49
$23
$26
Accrued environmental remediation268

268
Under recovered environmental remediation costs:   
Other regulatory assets, current$21
$2
$19
Other regulatory assets, deferred345
53
292
    
December 31, 2017:   
Environmental remediation liability:   
Other current liabilities$73
$22
$46
Accrued environmental remediation(*)
389

342
Under recovered environmental remediation costs:   
Other regulatory assets, current$38
$2
$31
Other regulatory assets, deferred473
47
379
(*)
At December 31, 2017, $85 million of Southern Company Gas' total environmental remediation liability related to Elizabethtown Gas, which was sold on July 1, 2018. See Note 15 under "Southern Company Gas" for more information regarding Southern Company Gas' sale of Elizabethtown Gas.
The ultimate outcome of these matters cannot be determined at this time; however, as a result of the regulatory treatment for environmental remediation expenses described above, the final disposition of these matters is not expected to have a material impact on the financial statements of Southern Company, Georgia Power, or Southern Company Gas.
Nuclear Fuel Disposal Costs
Acting through the DOE and pursuant to the Nuclear Waste Policy Act of 1982, the U.S. government entered into contracts with Alabama Power and Georgia Power that require the DOE to dispose of spent nuclear fuel and high level radioactive waste generated at Plants Farley, Hatch, and Vogtle Units 1 and 2 beginning no later than January 31, 1998. The DOE has yet to commence the performance of its contractual and statutory obligation to dispose of spent nuclear fuel. Consequently, Alabama Power and Georgia Power pursued and continue to pursue legal remedies against the U.S. government for its partial breach of contract.

COMBINED NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)
Southern Company and Subsidiary Companies 2018 Annual Report

In 2014, Alabama Power and Georgia Power filed lawsuits against the U.S. government for the costs of continuing to store spent nuclear fuel at Plants Farley, Hatch, and Vogtle Units 1 and 2 for the period from January 1, 2011 through December 31, 2013. The damage period was subsequently extended to December 31, 2014. In October 2017, Alabama Power and Georgia Power filed additional lawsuits against the U.S. government in the Court of Federal Claims for the costs of continuing to store spent nuclear fuel at Plants Farley, Hatch, and Vogtle Units 1 and 2 for the period from January 1, 2015 through December 31, 2017. Damages will continue to accumulate until the issue is resolved, the U.S. government disposes of Alabama Power's and Georgia Power's spent nuclear fuel pursuant to its contractual obligations, or alternative storage is otherwise provided. No amounts have been recognized in the financial statements as of December 31, 2018 for any potential recoveries from the pending lawsuits. The final outcome of these matters cannot be determined at this time. However, Alabama Power and Georgia Power expect to credit any recoveries back for the benefit of customers in accordance with direction from their respective PSC and, therefore, no material impact on Southern Company's, Alabama Power's, or Georgia Power's net income is expected.
On-site dry spent fuel storage facilities are operational at all three plants and can be expanded to accommodate spent fuel through the expected life of each plant.
Nuclear Insurance
Under the Price-Anderson Amendments Act (Act), Alabama Power and Georgia Power maintain agreements of indemnity with the NRC that, together with private insurance, cover third-party liability arising from any nuclear incident occurring at the companies' nuclear power plants. The Act provides funds up to $14.1 billion for public liability claims that could arise from a single nuclear incident. Each nuclear plant is insured against this liability to a maximum of $450 million by American Nuclear Insurers (ANI), with the remaining coverage provided by a mandatory program of deferred premiums that could be assessed, after a nuclear incident, against all owners of commercial nuclear reactors. A company could be assessed up to $138 million per incident for each licensed reactor it operates but not more than an aggregate of $20 million per incident to be paid in a calendar year for each reactor. Such maximum assessment, excluding any applicable state premium taxes, for Alabama Power and Georgia Power, based on its ownership and buyback interests in all licensed reactors, is $275 million and $267 million, respectively, per incident, but not more than an aggregate of $41 million and $40 million, respectively, to be paid for each incident in any one year. Both the maximum assessment per reactor and the maximum yearly assessment are adjusted for inflation at least every five years. The next scheduled adjustment is due no later than September 10, 2023. See Note 5 under "Joint Ownership Agreements" for additional information on joint ownership agreements.
Alabama Power and Georgia Power are members of Nuclear Electric Insurance Limited (NEIL), a mutual insurer established to provide property damage insurance in an amount up to $1.5 billion for members' operating nuclear generating facilities. Additionally, both companies have NEIL policies that currently provide decontamination, excess property insurance, and premature decommissioning coverage up to $1.25 billion for nuclear losses and policies providing coverage up to $750 million for non-nuclear losses in excess of the $1.5 billion primary coverage.
NEIL also covers the additional costs that would be incurred in obtaining replacement power during a prolonged accidental outage at a member's nuclear plant. Members can purchase this coverage, subject to a deductible waiting period of up to 26 weeks, with a maximum per occurrence per unit limit of $490 million. After the deductible period, weekly indemnity payments would be received until either the unit is operational or until the limit is exhausted. Alabama Power and Georgia Power each purchase limits based on the projected full cost of replacement power, subject to ownership limitations, and have each elected a 12-week deductible waiting period for each nuclear plant.
A builders' risk property insurance policy has been purchased from NEIL for the construction of Plant Vogtle Units 3 and 4. This policy provides the Vogtle Owners up to $2.75 billion for accidental property damage occurring during construction.
Under each of the NEIL policies, members are subject to assessments each year if losses exceed the accumulated funds available to the insurer. The maximum annual assessments for Alabama Power and Georgia Power as of December 31, 2018 under the NEIL policies would be $56 million and $85 million, respectively.
Claims resulting from terrorist acts are covered under both the ANI and NEIL policies (subject to normal policy limits). The aggregate, however, that NEIL will pay for all claims resulting from terrorist acts in any 12-month period is $3.2 billion plus such additional amounts NEIL can recover through reinsurance, indemnity, or other sources.
For all on-site property damage insurance policies for commercial nuclear power plants, the NRC requires that the proceeds of such policies shall be dedicated first for the sole purpose of placing the reactor in a safe and stable condition after an accident. Any remaining proceeds are to be applied next toward the costs of decontamination and debris removal operations ordered by the NRC, and any further remaining proceeds are to be paid either to the applicable company or to its debt trustees as may be appropriate under the policies and applicable trust indentures. In the event of a loss, the amount of insurance available might not be adequate to cover property damage and other expenses incurred. Uninsured losses and other expenses, to the extent not

COMBINED NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)
Southern Company and Subsidiary Companies 2018 Annual Report

recovered from customers, would be borne by Alabama Power or Georgia Power, as applicable, and could have a material effect on Southern Company's, Alabama Power's, and Georgia Power's financial condition and results of operations.
All retrospective assessments, whether generated for liability, property, or replacement power, may be subject to applicable state premium taxes.
Other Matters
Mississippi Power
In 2013, Mississippi Power submitted a lost revenue claim under the Deep Horizon Economic and Property Damages Settlement Agreement associated with the oil spill that occurred in the Gulf of Mexico in 2010. On May 14, 2018, Mississippi Power's claim was settled. The settlement proceeds of $18 million, net of expenses and income tax, are included in Mississippi Power's earnings for 2018. As of December 31, 2018, Mississippi Power had received half of the settlement proceeds.
Southern Company Gas
A wholly-owned subsidiary of Southern Company Gas owns and operates a natural gas storage facility consisting of two salt dome caverns in Louisiana. Periodic integrity tests are required in accordance with rules of the Louisiana Department of Natural Resources (DNR). In August 2017, in connection with an ongoing integrity project, updated seismic mapping indicated the proximity of one of the caverns to the edge of the salt dome may be less than the required minimum and could result in Southern Company Gas retiring the cavern early. At December 31, 2018, the facility's property, plant, and equipment had a net book value of $109 million, of which the cavern itself represents approximately 20%. A potential early retirement of this cavern is dependent upon several factors including compliance with an order from the Louisiana DNR detailing the requirements to place the cavern back in service, which includes, among other things, obtaining core samples to determine the composition of the sheath surrounding the edge of the salt dome.
The cavern continues to maintain its pressures and overall structural integrity. These events were considered in connection with Southern Company Gas' annual long-lived asset impairment analysis, which determined there was no impairment as of December 31, 2018. Any changes in results of monitoring activities, rates at which expiring capacity contracts are re-contracted, timing of placing the cavern back in service, or Louisiana DNR requirements could trigger impairment. Further, early retirement of the cavern could trigger impairment of other long-lived assets associated with the natural gas storage facility. The ultimate outcome of this matter cannot be determined at this time, but could have a significant impact on Southern Company's or Southern Company Gas' financial statements.
4. REVENUE FROM CONTRACTS WITH CUSTOMERS
The registrants generate revenues from a variety of sources, some of which are excluded from the scope of ASC 606, such as leases, derivatives, and certain cost recovery mechanisms. See Note 1 under "Recently Adopted Accounting StandardsRevenue" for additional information on the adoption of ASC 606 for revenue from contracts with customers and under "Revenues" for additional information on the revenue policies of the registrants.

COMBINED NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)
Southern Company and Subsidiary Companies 2018 Annual Report

The following tables disaggregate revenue sources for the year ended December 31, 2018:
 2018
 (in millions)
Southern Company 
Operating revenues 
Retail electric revenues(a)
 
Residential$6,608
Commercial5,266
Industrial3,224
Other124
Natural gas distribution revenues3,175
Alternative revenue programs(b)
(20)
Total retail electric and gas distribution revenues$18,377
Wholesale energy revenues(c)(d)
1,896
Wholesale capacity revenues(d)
620
Other natural gas revenues(e)
699
Other revenues(f)
1,903
Total operating revenues$23,495
(a)Retail electric revenues include $75 million of leases and a net increase of $60 million from certain cost recovery mechanisms that are not accounted for as revenue under ASC 606. See Note 2 for additional information on cost recovery mechanisms.
(b)
See Note 1 under "Revenues" for additional information on alternative revenue programs at the natural gas distribution utilities. Alternative revenue program revenues are presented net of any previously recognized program amounts billed to customers during the same accounting period.
(c)
Wholesale energy revenues include $299 million of revenues accounted for as derivatives, primarily related to short-term physical energy sales in the wholesale electricity market. See Note 1 under "RevenuesSouthern Power" and Note 14 for additional information on energy-related derivative contracts.
(d)Wholesale energy and wholesale capacity revenues include $384 million and $121 million, respectively, of PPA contracts accounted for as leases.
(e)
Other natural gas revenues related to Southern Company Gas' energy and risk management activities are presented net of the related costs of those activities and include gross third-party revenues of $7.0 billion of which $3.9 billion relates to contracts that are accounted for as derivatives. See Note 16 under "Southern Company Gas" for additional information on the components of wholesale gas services operating revenues.
(f)Other revenues include $322 million of revenues not accounted for under ASC 606.

COMBINED NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)
Southern Company and Subsidiary Companies 2018 Annual Report

 2018
 
Alabama
Power
Georgia
Power
Mississippi Power
 (in millions)
Operating revenues   
Retail revenues(a)(b)
   
Residential$2,335
$3,301
$273
Commercial1,578
3,023
286
Industrial1,428
1,344
321
Other26
84
9
Total retail electric revenues$5,367
$7,752
$889
Wholesale energy revenues(c)
297
133
348
Wholesale capacity revenues101
54
6
Other revenues(b)(d)
267
481
22
Total operating revenues$6,032
$8,420
$1,265
(a)Retail revenues at Alabama Power, Georgia Power, and Mississippi Power include a net increase or (net reduction) of $152 million, $(19) million, and $(13) million, respectively, related to certain cost recovery mechanisms that are not accounted for as revenue under ASC 606. See Note 2 for additional information on cost recovery mechanisms.
(b)Retail revenues and other revenues at Georgia Power include $74 million and $135 million, respectively, of revenues accounted for as leases.
(c)Wholesale energy revenues at Alabama Power, Georgia Power, and Mississippi Power include $20 million, $29 million, and $4 million, respectively, accounted for as derivatives primarily related to short-term physical energy sales in the wholesale electricity market. See Note 14 for additional information on energy-related derivative contracts.
(d)Other revenues at Alabama Power and Georgia Power include $57 million and $109 million, respectively, of revenues not accounted for under ASC 606.
 2018
 (in millions)
Southern Power 
PPA capacity revenues(a)
$580
PPA energy revenues(a)
1,140
Non-PPA revenues(b)
472
Other revenues13
Total operating revenues$2,205
(a)
PPA capacity revenues and PPA energy revenues include $186 million and $413 million, respectively, related to PPAs accounted for as leases. See Note 1 under "RevenuesSouthern Power" for additional information on capacity revenues accounted for as leases.
(b)
Non-PPA revenues include $242 million of revenues from short-term sales related to physical energy sales in the wholesale electricity market accounted for as derivatives. See Note 1 under "RevenuesSouthern Power" and Note 14 for additional information on energy-related derivative contracts.

COMBINED NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)
Southern Company and Subsidiary Companies 2018 Annual Report

 2018
 (in millions)
Southern Company Gas 
Operating revenues 
Natural gas distribution revenues 
Residential$1,525
Commercial436
Transportation944
Industrial40
Other230
Alternative revenue programs(a)
(20)
Total natural gas distribution revenues$3,155
Gas pipeline investments32
Wholesale gas services(b)
101
Gas marketing services(c)
568
Other revenues53
Total operating revenues$3,909
(a)
See Note 1 under "RevenuesSouthern Company Gas" for additional information on alternative revenue programs at the natural gas distribution utilities. Alternative revenue program revenues are presented net of any previously recognized program amounts billed to customers during the same accounting period.
(b)
Wholesale gas services revenues are presented net of the related costs associated with its energy trading and risk management activities. Operating revenues, as presented, include gross third-party revenues of $7.0 billion of which $3.9 billion relates to contracts that are accounted for as derivatives. See Note 16 under "Southern Company Gas" for additional information on the components of wholesale gas services operating revenues and Note 14 for additional information on energy-related derivative contracts.
(c)Gas marketing services includes $3 million of revenues not accounted for under ASC 606.
Contract Balances
The following table reflects the closing balances of receivables, contract assets, and contract liabilities related to revenues from contracts with customers at December 31, 2018:
 Receivables Contract Assets Contract Liabilities
 (in millions)
Southern Company$2,630
 $102
 $32
Alabama Power520
 
 12
Georgia Power721
 58
 7
Mississippi Power100
 
 
Southern Power118
 
 11
Southern Company Gas952
 
 2
As of December 31, 2018, Alabama Power had contract liabilities for outstanding performance obligations primarily related to extended service agreements. Georgia Power had contract assets primarily related to fixed retail customer bill programs where the payment is contingent upon Georgia Power's continued performance and the customer's continued participation in the program over the one-year contract term and to unregulated service agreements where payment is contingent upon project completion. Georgia Power also had contract liabilities for outstanding performance obligations primarily related to unregulated service agreements. Southern Power's contract liabilities relate to collections recognized in advance of revenue for certain levelized PPAs with Georgia Power. Southern Company's unregulated distributed generation business had $39 million and $11 million of contract assets and contract liabilities, respectively, at December 31, 2018 remaining for outstanding performance obligations.

COMBINED NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)
Southern Company and Subsidiary Companies 2018 Annual Report

Remaining Performance Obligations
The traditional electric operating companies and Southern Power have long-term contracts with customers in which revenues are recognized as performance obligations are satisfied over the contract term. These contracts primarily relate to PPAs whereby the traditional electric operating companies and Southern Power provide electricity and generation capacity to a customer. The revenue recognized for the delivery of electricity is variable; however, certain PPAs include a fixed payment for fixed generation capacity over the term of the contract. Southern Company's unregulated distributed generation business also has partially satisfied performance obligations related to certain fixed price contracts. Revenues from contracts with customers related to these performance obligations remaining at December 31, 2018 are expected to be recognized as follows:
 201920202021202220232024 and
Thereafter
 (in millions)
Southern Company(*)
$487
$341
$315
$315
$306
$2,103
Alabama Power23
22
26
23
22
140
Georgia Power41
38
40
30
31
82
Mississippi Power3
3
1



Southern Power323
295
270
281
275
2,028
(*)
Excludes amounts related to held for sale assets. See Note 15 under "Southern Company's Sale of Gulf Power" for additional information.
5. PROPERTY, PLANT, AND EQUIPMENT
Property, plant, and equipment is stated at original cost or fair value at acquisition, as appropriate, less any regulatory disallowances and impairments. Original cost may include: materials; labor; minor items of property; appropriate administrative and general costs; payroll-related costs such as taxes, pensions, and other benefits; and the interest capitalized and/or cost of equity funds used during construction.

COMBINED NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)
Southern Company and Subsidiary Companies 2018 Annual Report

The registrants' property, plant, and equipment in service consisted of the following at December 31, 2018 and 2017:
At December 31, 2018:Southern CompanyAlabama PowerGeorgia PowerMississippi PowerSouthern PowerSouthern Company Gas

(in millions)
Electric utilities:

     
Generation$52,324
$16,533
$19,145
$2,849
$13,246
$
Transmission11,344
4,380
6,156
769


Distribution18,746
7,389
10,389
968


General/other4,446
2,100
1,985
314
25

Electric utilities' plant in service86,860
30,402
37,675
4,900
13,271

Southern Company Gas:

     
Natural gas distribution utilities transportation and distribution12,409




12,409
Storage facilities1,640




1,640
Other1,128




1,128
Southern Company Gas plant in service15,177




15,177
Other plant in service1,669





Total plant in service$103,706
$30,402
$37,675
$4,900
$13,271
$15,177
At December 31, 2017:Southern CompanyAlabama PowerGeorgia PowerMississippi PowerSouthern PowerSouthern Company Gas
 (in millions)
Electric utilities:      
Generation$51,279
$14,213
$17,038
$2,801
$13,737
$
Transmission11,562
4,119
5,947
737


Distribution19,239
7,034
9,978
946


General/other4,402
1,960
1,898
289
18

Electric utilities' plant in service86,482
27,326
34,861
4,773
13,755

Southern Company Gas:    

 
Natural gas distribution utilities transportation and distribution13,079




13,079
Storage facilities1,599




1,599
Other1,155




1,155
Southern Company Gas plant in service15,833




15,833
Other plant in service1,227





Total plant in service$103,542
$27,326
$34,861
$4,773
$13,755
$15,833
The cost of replacements of property, exclusive of minor items of property, is capitalized. The cost of maintenance, repairs, and replacement of minor items of property is charged to other operations and maintenance expenses as incurred or performed with the exception of nuclear refueling costs and certain maintenance costs including those described below.
In accordance with orders from their respective state PSCs, Alabama Power and Georgia Power defer nuclear outage operations and maintenance expenses to a regulatory asset when the charges are incurred. Alabama Power amortizes the costs over a subsequent 18-month period with Plant Farley's fall outage cost amortization beginning in January of the following year and spring outage cost amortization beginning in July of the same year. Georgia Power amortizes its costs over each unit's operating cycle, or 18 months for Plant Vogtle Units 1 and 2 and 24 months for Plant Hatch Units 1 and 2.

COMBINED NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)
Southern Company and Subsidiary Companies 2018 Annual Report

A portion of Mississippi Power's railway track maintenance costs is charged to fuel stock and recovered through Mississippi Power's fuel clause.
The portion of Southern Company Gas' non-working gas used to maintain the structural integrity of natural gas storage facilities that is considered to be non-recoverable is recorded as depreciable property, plant, and equipment, while the recoverable or retained portion is recorded as non-depreciable property, plant, and equipment.
Capital Leases
Assets acquired under a capital lease are included in property, plant, and equipment and are further detailed in the table below for the applicable registrants:
 Southern Company
Georgia
Power
 (in millions)
At December 31, 2018:  
Office buildings$216
$61
PPAs(*)

144
Computer-related equipment43

Gas pipeline7

Less: Accumulated amortization(75)(84)
Balance, net of amortization$191
$121
   
At December 31, 2017:  
Office buildings$216
$61
PPAs(*)

144
Computer-related equipment51

Gas pipeline6

Less: Accumulated amortization(72)(68)
Balance, net of amortization$201
$137
(*)
Represents Georgia Power's affiliate PPAs with Southern Power. See Note 1 under "Affiliate Transactions" and Note 9 under "Fuel and Power Purchase AgreementsAffiliate" for additional information.
See Note 8 under "Long-term DebtCapital Leases" for additional information.
Depreciation and Amortization
The traditional electric operating companies' and Southern Company Gas' depreciation of the original cost of utility plant in service is provided primarily by using composite straight-line rates. The approximate rates for 2018, 2017, and 2016 are as follows:
 201820172016
 (percent)
Alabama Power3.0%2.9%3.0%
Georgia Power2.6%2.7%2.8%
Mississippi Power(*)
4.1%3.7%4.2%
Southern Company Gas2.9%2.9%2.8%
(*)Mississippi Power's decrease in 2017 is primarily the result of recording a loss on its lignite mine in June 2017.
Depreciation studies are conducted periodically to update the composite rates. These studies are filed with the respective state PSC and/or other applicable state and federal regulatory agencies for the traditional electric operating companies and natural gas distribution utilities. In 2016, Alabama Power submitted an updated depreciation study to the FERC and received authorization to use the recommended rates beginning January 2017. The study was also provided to the Alabama PSC.

COMBINED NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)
Southern Company and Subsidiary Companies 2018 Annual Report

Under the terms of the 2013 ARP, Georgia Power amortized approximately $14 million annually from 2014 through 2016 of its remaining regulatory liability related to other cost of removal obligations.
Southern Company's 2017 depreciation includes $34 million of reductions in depreciation recognized by Gulf Power under the terms of its 2013 rate case settlement agreement with the Florida PSC.
When property, plant, and equipment subject to composite depreciation is retired or otherwise disposed of in the normal course of business, its original cost, together with the cost of removal, less salvage, is charged to accumulated depreciation. For other property dispositions, the applicable cost and accumulated depreciation are removed from the balance sheet accounts, and a gain or loss is recognized. Minor items of property included in the original cost of the asset are retired when the related property unit is retired.
At December 31, 2018 and 2017, accumulated depreciation for utility plant in service totaled $30.3 billion and $30.8 billion, respectively, for Southern Company and $4.3 billion and $4.5 billion, respectively, for Southern Company Gas.
Depreciation of the original cost of other plant in service is provided primarily on a straight-line basis over estimated useful lives, which for Southern Company range up to 65 years and for Southern Company Gas range from five to 15 years for transportation equipment, 40 to 60 years for storage facilities, and up to 65 years for other assets. At December 31, 2018 and 2017, accumulated depreciation for other plant in service totaled $766 million and $673 million, respectively, for Southern Company and $129 million and $75 million, respectively, for Southern Company Gas.
Southern Power
Southern Power applies component depreciation, where depreciation is computed principally by the straight-line method over the estimated useful life of the asset. Certain of Southern Power's generation assets related to natural gas-fired facilities are depreciated on a units-of-production basis, using hours or starts, to better match outage and maintenance costs to the usage of, and revenues from, these assets. The primary assets in Southern Power's property, plant, and equipment are generating facilities, which generally have estimated useful lives as follows:
Southern Power Generating FacilityUseful life
Natural gasUp to 45 years
BiomassUp to 40 years
SolarUp to 35 years
WindUp to 30 years
Southern Power reviews its estimated useful lives and salvage values on an ongoing basis. The results of these reviews could result in changes which could have a material impact on Southern Power's net income in the near term.
When Southern Power's depreciable property, plant, and equipment is retired, or otherwise disposed of in the normal course of business, the applicable cost and accumulated depreciation is removed and a gain or loss is recognized in the statements of income.

COMBINED NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)
Southern Company and Subsidiary Companies 2018 Annual Report

Joint Ownership Agreements
At December 31, 2018, the registrants' percentage ownership and investment (exclusive of nuclear fuel) in jointly-owned facilities in commercial operation were as follows:
Facility (Type)
Percent
Ownership
 Plant in Service 
Accumulated
Depreciation
 CWIP
   (in millions)
Alabama Power       
Greene County (natural gas) Units 1 and 260.0%
(a) 
$274
 $71
 $1
Plant Miller (coal) Units 1 and 291.8
(b) 
2,056
 619
 138
        
Georgia Power       
Plant Hatch (nuclear)50.1%
(c) 
$1,569
 $615
 $54
Plant Vogtle (nuclear) Units 1 and 245.7
(c) 
3,804
 2,150
 84
Plant Scherer (coal) Units 1 and 28.4
(c) 
266
 96
 14
Plant Scherer (coal) Unit 375.0
(c) 
1,238
 493
 66
Plant Wansley (coal)53.5
(c) 
1,179
 362
 160
Rocky Mountain (pumped storage)25.4
(d) 
184
 135
 
        
Mississippi Power       
Greene County (natural gas) Units 1 and 240.0%
(a) 
$180
 $93
 $1
Plant Daniel (coal) Units 1 and 250.0
(e) 
723
 201
 7
        
Southern Company Gas       
Dalton Pipeline (natural gas pipeline)50.0%
(f) 
$270
 $6
 $
(a)Jointly owned by Alabama Power and Mississippi Power and operated and maintained by Alabama Power.
(b)Jointly owned with PowerSouth and operated and maintained by Alabama Power.
(c)Georgia Power owns undivided interests in Plants Hatch, Vogtle Units 1 and 2, Scherer, and Wansley in varying amounts jointly with one or more of the following entities: OPC, MEAG Power, Dalton, Florida Power & Light Company, JEA, and Gulf Power. Georgia Power has been contracted to operate and maintain the plants as agent for the co-owners and is jointly and severally liable for third party claims related to these plants.
(d)Jointly owned with OPC, which is the operator of the plant.
(e)Jointly owned by Gulf Power and Mississippi Power. In accordance with the operating agreement, Mississippi Power acts as Gulf Power's agent with respect to the operation and maintenance of these units.
(f)Jointly owned with The Williams Companies, Inc. The Dalton Pipeline is a 115-mile natural gas pipeline that serves as an extension of the Transco natural gas pipeline system into northwest Georgia. Southern Company Gas also entered into an agreement to lease its 50% undivided ownership in the Dalton Pipeline that became effective when it was placed in service in August 2017. Under the lease, Southern Company Gas will receive approximately $26 million annually for an initial term of 25 years. The lessee is responsible for maintaining the pipeline during the lease term and for providing service to transportation customers under its FERC-regulated tariff.
Georgia Power also owns 45.7% of Plant Vogtle Units 3 and 4, which are currently under construction and had a CWIP balance of $4.5 billion at December 31, 2018. See Note 2 under "Georgia PowerNuclear Construction" for additional information.
On December 4, 2018, Southern Power completed the sale of its 65% ownership interest in Plant Stanton Unit A, which Southern Power previously jointly-owned with OUC, the FMPA, and the KUA, to NextEra Energy. See Note 15 under "Southern PowerSales of Natural Gas Plants" for additional information.
In conjunction with Southern Company's sale of Gulf Power, Mississippi Power and Gulf Power have committed to seek a restructuring of their 50% undivided ownership interests in Plant Daniel such that each of them would, after the restructuring, own 100% of a generating unit. On January 15, 2019, Gulf Power provided notice to Mississippi Power that Gulf Power will retire its share of the generating capacity of Plant Daniel on January 15, 2024. Mississippi Power has the option to purchase Gulf Power's ownership interest for $1 on January 15, 2024, provided that Mississippi Power exercises the option no later than 120 days prior to that date. Mississippi Power is assessing the potential operational and economic effects of Gulf Power's notice. The ultimate outcome of these matters remains subject to completion of Mississippi Power's evaluations and applicable regulatory

COMBINED NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)
Southern Company and Subsidiary Companies 2018 Annual Report

approvals, including the FERC and the Mississippi PSC, and cannot now be determined. See Note 15 under "Southern Company's Sale of Gulf Power" for information regarding the sale of Gulf Power.
The registrants' proportionate share of their jointly-owned facility operating expenses is included in the corresponding operating expenses in the statements of income and each registrant is responsible for providing its own financing.
Assets Subject to Lien
On October 2, 2018, the Mississippi PSC approved executed agreements between Mississippi Power and its largest retail customer, Chevron Products Company (Chevron), for Mississippi Power to continue providing retail service to the Chevron refinery in Pascagoula, Mississippi through 2038. The agreements grant Chevron a security interest in the co-generation assets, with a net book value of approximately $101 million at December 31, 2018, located at the refinery that is exercisable upon the occurrence of (i) certain bankruptcy events or (ii) other events of default coupled with specific reductions in steam output at the facility and a downgrade of Mississippi Power's credit rating to below investment grade by two of the three rating agencies.
Under the terms of the PPA and the expansion PPA for Southern Power's Plant Mankato, which was acquired in 2016, approximately $563 million of assets, primarily related to property, plant, and equipment, are subject to lien at December 31, 2018. See Note 15 under "Southern PowerSales of Natural Gas Plants" for additional information regarding the proposed sale of Plant Mankato.
See Note 3 under "General Litigation MattersSouthern Power" for information regarding liens on Southern Power's Roserock facility.
See Note 8 under "Secured Debt" for information regarding debt secured by certain assets of Georgia Power, Mississippi Power, and Southern Company Gas.
6. ASSET RETIREMENT OBLIGATIONS
AROs are computed as the present value of the estimated costs for an asset's future retirement and are recorded in the period in which the liability is incurred. The estimated costs are capitalized as part of the related long-lived asset and depreciated over the asset's useful life. In the absence of quoted market prices, AROs are estimated using present value techniques in which estimates of future cash outlays associated with the asset retirements are discounted using a credit-adjusted risk-free rate. Estimates of the timing and amounts of future cash outlays are based on projections of when and how the assets will be retired and the cost of future removal activities. Each traditional electric operating company and natural gas distribution utility has received accounting guidance from its state PSC or applicable state regulatory agency allowing the continued accrual or recovery of other retirement costs for long-lived assets that it does not have a legal obligation to retire. Accordingly, the accumulated removal costs for these obligations are reflected in the balance sheets as regulatory liabilities and amounts to be recovered are reflected in the balance sheets as regulatory assets.
The ARO liabilities for the traditional electric operating companies primarily relate to facilities that are subject to the CCR Rule, principally ash ponds. In addition, Alabama Power and Georgia Power have retirement obligations related to the decommissioning of nuclear facilities (Alabama Power's Plant Farley and Georgia Power's ownership interests in Plant Hatch and Plant Vogtle Units 1 and 2). See "Nuclear Decommissioning" herein for additional information. The traditional electric operating companies also have AROs related to various landfill sites, asbestos removal, and underground storage tanks, as well as, for Alabama Power, disposal of polychlorinated biphenyls in certain transformers and sulfur hexafluoride gas in certain substation breakers, for Georgia Power, gypsum cells, and for Mississippi Power, mine reclamation and water wells. The ARO liability for Southern Power primarily relates to Southern Power's solar and wind facilities, which are located on long-term land leases requiring the restoration of land at the end of the lease.
The traditional electric operating companies and Southern Company Gas also have identified other retirement obligations, such as obligations related to certain electric transmission and distribution facilities, certain asbestos containing material within long-term assets not subject to ongoing repair and maintenance activities, certain wireless communication towers, the disposal of polychlorinated biphenyls in certain transformers, leasehold improvements, equipment on customer property, and property associated with the Southern Company system's rail lines and natural gas pipelines. However, liabilities for the removal of these assets have not been recorded because the settlement timing for certain retirement obligations related to these assets is indeterminable and, therefore, the fair value of the retirement obligations cannot be reasonably estimated. A liability for these retirement obligations will be recognized when sufficient information becomes available to support a reasonable estimation of the ARO.
Southern Company and the traditional electric operating companies will continue to recognize in their respective statements of income allowed removal costs in accordance with regulatory treatment. Any differences between costs recognized in accordance

COMBINED NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)
Southern Company and Subsidiary Companies 2018 Annual Report

with accounting standards related to asset retirement and environmental obligations and those reflected in rates are recognized as either a regulatory asset or liability in the balance sheets as ordered by the various state PSCs.
Details of the AROs included in the balance sheets are as follows:
 Southern CompanyAlabama PowerGeorgia PowerMississippi PowerSouthern Power
 (in millions)
Balance at December 31, 2016$4,514
$1,533
$2,532
$179
$64
Liabilities incurred16

4

6
Liabilities settled(177)(26)(120)(23)
Accretion179
77
89
5
4
Cash flow revisions292
125
133
13
4
Balance at December 31, 2017$4,824
$1,709
$2,638
$174
$78
Liabilities incurred29

27

2
Liabilities settled(244)(55)(116)(35)
Accretion217
106
94
5
4
Cash flow revisions4,737
1,450
3,186
16

Reclassification to held for sale(169)



Balance at December 31, 2018$9,394
$3,210
$5,829
$160
$84
In June 2018, Alabama Power recorded an increase of approximately $1.2 billion to its AROs related to the CCR Rule. Mississippi Power also recorded an increase of approximately $11 million to its AROs related to an ash pond at Plant Greene County, which is jointly-owned with Alabama Power. The revised cost estimates were based on information from feasibility studies performed on ash ponds in use at plants operated by Alabama Power, including Plant Greene County. During the second quarter 2018, Alabama Power's management completed its analysis of these studies which indicated that additional closure costs, primarily related to increases in estimated ash volume, water management requirements, and design revisions, will be required to close these ash ponds under the planned closure-in-place methodology. As the level of work becomes more defined in the next 12 months, it is likely that these cost estimates will change and the change could be material.
In December 2018, Georgia Power recorded an increase of approximately $3.1 billion to its AROs related to the CCR Rule and the related state rule. During the second half of 2018, Georgia Power completed a strategic assessment related to its plans to close the ash ponds at all of its generating plants in compliance with the CCR Rule and the related state rule. This assessment included engineering and constructability studies related to design assumptions for ash pond closures and advanced engineering methods. The results indicated that additional closure costs will be required to close these ash ponds, primarily due to changes in closure strategies, the estimated amount of ash to be excavated, and additional water management requirements necessary to support closure strategies. These factors also impact the estimated timing of future cash outlays.
In June 2018, Alabama Power completed an updated decommissioning cost site study for Plant Farley. The estimated cost of decommissioning based on the study resulted in an increase in Alabama Power's ARO liability of approximately $300 million. In December 2018, Georgia Power completed updated decommissioning cost site studies for Plant Hatch and Plant Vogtle Units 1 and 2. The estimated cost of decommissioning based on the studies resulted in an increase in Georgia Power's ARO liability of approximately $130 million. See "Nuclear Decommissioning" below for additional information.
The 2018 reclassification of a portion of the ARO liability to liabilities held for sale by Southern Company represents the AROs related to Gulf Power. See Note 15 under "Southern Company's Sale of Gulf Power" and "Assets Held for Sale" for additional information.
In 2017, Alabama Power's and Georgia Power's cash flow revisions were primarily related to changes in closure strategy for ash ponds and landfills. Georgia Power's cash flow revisions in 2017 also related to changes in closure strategy for gypsum cells. Mississippi Power's cash flow revisions in 2017 primarily related to a revision in the closure date of its lignite mine. The liabilities settled in 2017 for Alabama Power, Georgia Power, and Mississippi Power were primarily related to ash pond closure activity.
The cost estimates for AROs related to the CCR Rule are based on information at December 31, 2018 using various assumptions related to closure and post-closure costs, timing of future cash outlays, inflation and discount rates, and the potential methods for

COMBINED NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)
Southern Company and Subsidiary Companies 2018 Annual Report

complying with the CCR Rule requirements for closure. The traditional electric operating companies expect to continue to periodically update their ARO cost estimates, which could increase further, as additional information becomes available. Absent continued recovery of ARO costs through regulated rates, Southern Company's and the traditional electric operating companies' results of operations, cash flows, and financial condition could be materially impacted. The ultimate outcome of this matter cannot be determined at this time.
Nuclear Decommissioning
The NRC requires licensees of commercial nuclear power reactors to establish a plan for providing reasonable assurance of funds for future decommissioning. Alabama Power and Georgia Power have external trust funds (Funds) to comply with the NRC's regulations. Use of the Funds is restricted to nuclear decommissioning activities. The Funds are managed and invested in accordance with applicable requirements of various regulatory bodies, including the NRC, the FERC, and state PSCs, as well as the IRS. While Alabama Power and Georgia Power are allowed to prescribe an overall investment policy to the Funds' managers, neither Southern Company nor its subsidiaries or affiliates are allowed to engage in the day-to-day management of the Funds or to mandate individual investment decisions. Day-to-day management of the investments in the Funds is delegated to unrelated third-party managers with oversight by the management of Alabama Power and Georgia Power. The Funds' managers are authorized, within certain investment guidelines, to actively buy and sell securities at their own discretion in order to maximize the return on the Funds' investments. The Funds are invested in a tax-efficient manner in a diversified mix of equity and fixed income securities and are reported as trading securities.
Alabama Power and Georgia Power record the investment securities held in the Funds at fair value, as disclosed in Note 13, as management believes that fair value best represents the nature of the Funds. Gains and losses, whether realized or unrealized, are recorded in the regulatory liability for AROs in the balance sheets and are not included in net income or OCI. Fair value adjustments and realized gains and losses are determined on a specific identification basis.
The Funds at Georgia Power participate in a securities lending program through the managers of the Funds. Under this program, Georgia Power's Funds' investment securities are loaned to institutional investors for a fee. Securities loaned are fully collateralized by cash, letters of credit, and/or securities issued or guaranteed by the U.S. government or its agencies or instrumentalities. At December 31, 2018 and 2017, approximately $27 million and $76 million, respectively, of the fair market value of Georgia Power's Funds' securities were on loan and pledged to creditors under the Funds' managers' securities lending program. The fair value of the collateral received was approximately $28 million and $77 million at December 31, 2018 and 2017, respectively, and can only be sold by the borrower upon the return of the loaned securities. The collateral received is treated as a non-cash item in the statements of cash flows.
Investment securities in the Funds for December 31, 2018 and 2017 were as follows:
 Southern Company
Alabama
Power
Georgia
Power
 (in millions)
At December 31, 2018:   
Equity securities$919
$594
$325
Debt securities726
201
525
Other securities74
51
23
Total investment securities in the Funds$1,719
$846
$873
    
At December 31, 2017:   
Equity securities$1,059
$644
$415
Debt securities725
223
502
Other securities47
35
12
Total investment securities in the Funds$1,831
$902
$929
These amounts exclude receivables related to investment income and pending investment sales and payables related to pending investment purchases. For Southern Company and Georgia Power, these amounts include Georgia Power's investment securities pledged to creditors and collateral received and excludes payables related to Georgia Power's securities lending program.

COMBINED NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)
Southern Company and Subsidiary Companies 2018 Annual Report

The fair value increases (decreases) of the Funds, including reinvested interest and dividends and excluding the Funds' expenses, for 2018, 2017, and 2016 are shown in the table below. The fair value increases (decreases) included unrealized gains (losses) on securities held in the Funds at each of December 31, 2018, 2017, and 2016, which are also shown in the table below.
 Southern Company
Alabama
Power
Georgia
Power
 (in millions)
Fair value increases (decreases)   
2018$(67)$(38)$(29)
2017233
125
108
2016114
76
38
    
Unrealized gains (losses)   
At December 31, 2018$(183)$(96)$(87)
At December 31, 2017181
98
83
At December 31, 201648
34
14
The investment securities held in the Funds continue to be managed with a long-term focus. Accordingly, all purchases and sales within the Funds are presented separately in the statements of cash flows as investing cash flows, consistent with the nature of the securities and purpose for which the securities were acquired.
For Alabama Power, approximately $17 million and $18 million at December 31, 2018 and 2017, respectively, previously recorded in internal reserves is being transferred into the Funds through 2040 as approved by the Alabama PSC. The NRC's minimum external funding requirements are based on a generic estimate of the cost to decommission only the radioactive portions of a nuclear unit based on the size and type of reactor. Alabama Power and Georgia Power have filed plans with the NRC designed to ensure that, over time, the deposits and earnings of the Funds will provide the minimum funding amounts prescribed by the NRC.
At December 31, 2018 and 2017, the accumulated provisions for the external decommissioning trust funds were as follows:
 2018 2017
 (in millions)
Alabama Power   
Plant Farley$846
 $902
    
Georgia Power   
Plant Hatch$547
 $583
Plant Vogtle Units 1 and 2326
 346
Total$873
 $929

COMBINED NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)
Southern Company and Subsidiary Companies 2018 Annual Report

Site study cost is the estimate to decommission a specific facility as of the site study year. The decommissioning cost estimates are based on prompt dismantlement and removal of the plant from service. The actual decommissioning costs may vary from these estimates because of changes in the assumed date of decommissioning, changes in NRC requirements, or changes in the assumptions used in making these estimates. The estimated costs of decommissioning at December 31, 2018 based on the most current studies, which were each performed in 2018, were as follows:
 
Plant
Farley
 
Plant
  Hatch(*)
 
Plant Vogtle
 Units 1 and 2(*)
Decommissioning periods:     
Beginning year2037
 2034
 2047
Completion year2076
 2075
 2079
 (in millions)
Site study costs:     
Radiated structures$1,234
 $734
 $601
Spent fuel management387
 172
 162
Non-radiated structures99
 56
 79
Total site study costs$1,720
 $962
 $842
(*)Based on Georgia Power's ownership interests.
For ratemaking purposes, Alabama Power's decommissioning costs are based on the site study and Georgia Power's decommissioning costs are based on the NRC generic estimate to decommission the radioactive portion of the facilities and the site study estimate for spent fuel management as of 2012. Significant assumptions used to determine these costs for ratemaking were an estimated inflation rate of 4.5% and 2.4% for Alabama Power and Georgia Power, respectively, and an estimated trust earnings rate of 7.0% and 4.4% for Alabama Power and Georgia Power, respectively.
Amounts previously contributed to the Funds for Plant Farley are currently projected to be adequate to meet the decommissioning obligations. Alabama Power will continue to provide site-specific estimates of the decommissioning costs and related projections of funds in the external trust to the Alabama PSC and, if necessary, would seek the Alabama PSC's approval to address any changes in a manner consistent with NRC and other applicable requirements.
Under the 2013 ARP, the Georgia PSC approved Georgia Power's annual decommissioning cost for ratemaking of $4 million and $2 million for Plant Hatch and Plant Vogtle Units 1 and 2, respectively. Georgia Power expects the Georgia PSC to review and adjust, if necessary, the amounts collected in rates for nuclear decommissioning costs in the Georgia Power 2019 Base Rate Case.
7. CONSOLIDATED ENTITIES AND EQUITY METHOD INVESTMENTS
The registrants may hold ownership interests in a number of business ventures with varying ownership structures. Partnership interests and other variable interests are evaluated to determine if each entity is a VIE. If a venture is a VIE for which a registrant is the primary beneficiary, the assets, liabilities, and results of operations of the entity are consolidated. The registrants reassess the conclusion as to whether an entity is a VIE upon certain occurrences, which are deemed reconsideration events.
For entities that are not determined to be VIEs, the registrants evaluate whether they have control or significant influence over the investee to determine the appropriate consolidation and presentation. Generally, entities under the control of a registrant are consolidated, and entities over which a registrant can exert significant influence, but which a registrant does not control, are accounted for under the equity method of accounting. However, the registrants may also invest in partnerships and limited liability companies that maintain separate ownership accounts. All such investments are required to be accounted for under the equity method unless the interest is so minor that there is virtually no influence over operating and financial policies, as are all investments in joint ventures.
Investments accounted for under the equity method are recorded within equity investments in unconsolidated subsidiaries in the balance sheets and, for Southern Company and Southern Company Gas, the equity income is recorded within earnings from equity method investments in the statements of income. See "SEGCO" and "Southern Company Gas" herein for additional information.

COMBINED NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)
Southern Company and Subsidiary Companies 2018 Annual Report

SEGCO
Alabama Power and Georgia Power own equally all of the outstanding capital stock of SEGCO, which owns electric generating units with a total rated capacity of 1,020 MWs, as well as associated transmission facilities. Alabama Power and Georgia Power account for SEGCO using the equity method; Southern Company consolidates SEGCO. SEGCO uses natural gas as the primary fuel source for 1,000 MWs of its generating capacity. The capacity of these units is sold equally to Alabama Power and Georgia Power. Alabama Power and Georgia Power make payments sufficient to provide for the operating expenses, taxes, interest expense, and a ROE. The share of purchased power included in purchased power, affiliates in the statements of income totaled $102 million in 2018, $76 million in 2017, and $55 million in 2016 for Alabama Power and $105 million in 2018, $78 million in 2017, and $57 million in 2016 for Georgia Power.
SEGCO paid $18 million of dividends in 2018 and $24 million in each of 2017 and 2016, of which one-half of each was paid to each of Alabama Power and Georgia Power. In addition, Alabama Power and Georgia Power each recognize 50% of SEGCO's net income.
Alabama Power, which owns and operates a generating unit adjacent to the SEGCO generating units, has a joint ownership agreement with SEGCO for the ownership of an associated gas pipeline. Alabama Power owns 14% of the pipeline with the remaining 86% owned by SEGCO.
See Note 9 under "Guarantees" for additional information regarding guarantees of Alabama Power and Georgia Power related to SEGCO.
Southern Power
Variable Interest Entities
Southern Power has certain wholly-owned subsidiaries that are determined to be VIEs. The CompanySouthern Power is considered the primary beneficiary of these VIEs because it controls the most significant activities of the VIEs, including operating and maintaining the respective assets, and has the obligation to absorb expected losses of these VIEs to the extent of its equity interests.
SP Solar
On May 22, 2018, Southern Power sold a noncontrolling 33% limited partnership interest in SP Solar to Global Atlantic Financial Group Limited (Global Atlantic). See Note 15 under "Southern Power" for additional information. A wholly-owned subsidiary of Southern Power is the general partner and holds a 1% ownership interest in SP Solar and another wholly-owned subsidiary of Southern Power owns the remaining 66% ownership in SP Solar. SP Solar qualifies as a VIE since the arrangement is structured as a limited partnership and the 33% limited partner does not have substantive kick-out rights against the general partner. Southern Power previously consolidated SP Solar and will continue to do so as the primary beneficiary of the VIE since it controls the most significant activities of the partnership, including operating and maintaining its assets.
At December 31, 2018, SP Solar had total assets of $6.3 billion, total liabilities of $113 million, and noncontrolling interests of $1.2 billion. Cash distributions from SP Solar are allocated 67% to Southern Power and 33% to Global Atlantic in accordance with their partnership interest percentage. Under the terms of the limited partnership agreement, distributions without limited partner consent are limited to available cash and SP Solar is obligated to distribute all such available cash to its partners each quarter. Available cash includes all cash generated in the quarter subject to the maintenance of appropriate operating reserves.
Transfers and sales of the assets in the VIE are subject to limited partner consent and the liabilities do not have recourse to the general credit of Southern Power. Liabilities consist of customary working capital items and do not include any long-term debt.
SP Wind
On December 11, 2018, Southern Power sold a noncontrolling tax-equity interest in SP Wind to three financial investors. SP Wind owns eight operating wind farms. See Note 15 under "Southern Power" for additional information. Southern Power owns 100% of the class B membership interests and the three financial investors own 100% of the Class A membership interests. SP Wind qualifies as a VIE since the structure of the arrangement is similar to a limited partnership and the Class A members do not have substantive kick-out rights against Southern Power. Southern Power previously consolidated SP Wind and will continue to do so as the primary beneficiary of the VIE since it controls the most significant activities of the entity, including operating and maintaining its assets.
At December 31, 2018, SP Wind had total assets of $2.5 billion, total liabilities of $51 million, and noncontrolling interests of $47 million. Under the terms of the limited liability agreement, distributions without Class A member consent are limited to available cash and SP Wind is obligated to distribute all such available cash to its members each quarter. Available cash includes all cash

COMBINED NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)
Southern Company and Subsidiary Companies 2018 Annual Report

generated in the quarter subject to the maintenance of appropriate operating reserves. Cash distributions from SP Wind are generally allocated 60% to Southern Power and 40% to the three financial investors in accordance with the limited liability agreement.
Transfers and sales of the assets in the VIE are subject to Class A member consent and the liabilities do not have recourse to the general credit of Southern Power. Liabilities consist of customary working capital items and do not include any long-term debt.
Redeemable Noncontrolling Interests
In April 2017, Southern Power reclassified approximately $114 million from redeemable noncontrolling interests to non-redeemable noncontrolling interests due to the expiration of an option allowing SunPower Corporation to require Southern Power to purchase its redeemable noncontrolling interest at fair market value. In addition, in October 2017, Turner Renewable Energy, LLC redeemed at fair value its 10% interest of redeemable noncontrolling interest in certain of Southern Power's solar facilities. At December 31, 2018 and 2017, there were no outstanding redeemable noncontrolling interests.
The following table presents the changes in Southern Power's redeemable noncontrolling interests for the years ended December 31, 2017 and 2016:
 2017 2016
 (in millions)
Beginning balance$164
 $43
Net income attributable to redeemable noncontrolling interests2
 4
Distributions to redeemable noncontrolling interests(2) (1)
Capital contributions from redeemable noncontrolling interests2
 118
Redemption of redeemable noncontrolling interests(59) 
Reclassification to non-redeemable noncontrolling interests(114) 
Change in fair value of redeemable noncontrolling interests7
 
Ending balance$
 $164
The following table presents the attribution of net income to Southern Power and the noncontrolling interests for the years ended December 31, 2017 and 2016:
 2017 2016
 (in millions)
Net income$1,117
 $374
Less: Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests44
 32
Less: Net income attributable to redeemable noncontrolling interests2
 4
Net income attributable to Southern Power$1,071
 $338
2.Southern Company Gas
SouthStar, previously a joint venture owned 85% by Southern Company Gas and 15% by Piedmont, was the only VIE for which Southern Company Gas was the primary beneficiary, prior to October 2016 when Southern Company Gas completed its purchase of Piedmont's remaining interest in SouthStar.
In 2015, Georgia Natural Gas Company (GNG), a 100%-owned, direct subsidiary of Southern Company Gas, notified Piedmont of its election, pursuant to a change in control of SouthStar, to purchase Piedmont's 15% interest in SouthStar at fair market value. This purchase was contingent upon the closing of the merger between Piedmont and Duke Energy Corporation (Duke Energy). In October 2016, after Piedmont and Duke Energy completed their merger, GNG completed its purchase of Piedmont's interest in SouthStar and paid a purchase price of $160 million and $15 million for Piedmont's share of SouthStar's 2016 earnings through the date of acquisition.
Southern Company Gas' cash flows used for financing activities included SouthStar's distribution to Piedmont for its portion of SouthStar's annual earnings from the previous year. For the successor period of July 1, 2016 through December 31, 2016, SouthStar made a distribution of $15 million upon completion of the purchase of Piedmont's interest in SouthStar. For the predecessor period of January 1, 2016 through June 30, 2016, SouthStar distributed $19 million to Piedmont.

COMBINED NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)
Southern Company and Subsidiary Companies 2018 Annual Report

Equity Method Investments
The carrying amounts of Southern Company Gas' equity method investments at December 31, 2018 and 2017 and related income from those investments for the successor years ended December 31, 2018 and 2017, the successor period of July 1, 2016 through December 31, 2016, and the predecessor period of January 1, 2016 through June 30, 2016 were as follows:
Investment BalanceDecember 31, 2018 December 31, 2017
 (in millions)
SNG$1,261
 $1,262
PennEast Pipeline71
 57
Atlantic Coast Pipeline83
 41
Other123
 117
Total$1,538
 $1,477
 Successor Predecessor
Earnings from Equity Method InvestmentsYear ended December 31, 2018 Year ended December 31, 2017 July 1, 2016 through December 31, 2016  January 1, 2016 through June 30, 2016
 (in millions) (in millions)
SNG$131
 $88
 $56
  $
PennEast Pipeline5
 6
 
  
Atlantic Coast Pipeline7
 6
 1
  
Other5
 6
 3
  2
Total$148
 $106
 $60
  $2
SNG
In 2016, Southern Company Gas, through a wholly-owned, indirect subsidiary, acquired a 50% equity interest in SNG, which is accounted for as an equity method investment. See Note 15 under "Southern Company GasInvestment in SNG" for additional information. Selected financial information of SNG at December 31, 2018 and 2017 and for the years ended December 31, 2018 and 2017 and for the period September 1, 2016 through December 31, 2016 is as follows:
 At December 31,
Balance Sheet Information2018 2017
 (in millions)
Current assets$104
 $82
Property, plant, and equipment2,606
 2,439
Deferred charges and other assets121
 121
Total Assets$2,831
 $2,642
    
Current liabilities$103
 $110
Long-term debt1,103
 1,102
Other deferred charges and other liabilities212
 76
Total Liabilities$1,418
 $1,288
    
Total Stockholders' Equity$1,413
 $1,354
Total Liabilities and Stockholders' Equity$2,831
 $2,642

COMBINED NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)
Southern Company and Subsidiary Companies 2018 Annual Report

Income Statement Information
Year ended
December 31, 2018
 
Year ended
December 31, 2017
 September 1, 2016
through December 31, 2016
 (in millions)
Revenues$604
 $544
 $230
Operating income310
 242
 137
Net income261
 175
 115
Other Investments
Pipelines
In 2014, Southern Company Gas entered into a partnership in which it holds a 20% ownership interest in the PennEast Pipeline, an interstate pipeline company formed to develop and operate a 118-mile natural gas pipeline between New Jersey and Pennsylvania. The initial transportation capacity of 1.0 Bcf per day, is under long-term contracts, mainly with public utilities and other market-serving entities, such as electric generation companies, in New Jersey, Pennsylvania, and New York.
Also in 2014, Southern Company Gas entered into a project in which it holds a 5% ownership interest in the Atlantic Coast Pipeline, an interstate pipeline company formed to develop and operate a 594-mile natural gas pipeline in North Carolina, Virginia, and West Virginia with initial transportation capacity of 1.5 Bcf per day.
See Note 2 under "FERC Matters – Southern Company Gas" for additional information on these pipeline projects.
Pivotal JAX LNG, LLC
Southern Company Gas owns a 50% interest in a LNG liquefaction and storage facility in Jacksonville, Florida, which was placed in service in October 2018. This facility is outfitted with a 2.0 million gallon storage tank with the capacity to produce in excess of 120,000 gallons of LNG per day.

COMBINED NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)
Southern Company and Subsidiary Companies 2018 Annual Report

8. FINANCING
Securities Due Within One Year
A summary of long-term securities due within one year at each of December 31, 2018 and 2017 is as follows:
 December 31, 2018
 Southern CompanyAlabama PowerGeorgia
Power
Mississippi PowerSouthern PowerSouthern Company Gas
 (in millions)
Senior notes$2,950
$200
$500
$
$600
$300
Revenue bonds(a)
173

108
40


First mortgage bonds50




50
Capitalized leases24
1
13



Other(b)
1

(4)
(1)7
Total$3,198
$201
$617
$40
$599
$357
(a)For Southern Company and Mississippi Power, includes $40 million in pollution control revenue bonds classified as short term since they are variable rate demand obligations supported by short-term credit facilities; however, the final maturity dates range from 2020 to 2028.
(b)Represents unamortized debt related amounts, acquisition accounting fair value adjustments, and/or fair value hedges. See Note 14 for additional information regarding fair value hedges.
 December 31, 2017
 Southern CompanyGeorgia
Power
Mississippi PowerSouthern PowerSouthern Company Gas
 (in millions)
Senior notes$2,354
$750
$
$350
$155
Long-term bank term loans1,420
100
900
420

Revenue bonds(a)
90

90


Capitalized leases31
11



Other(b)
(3)(4)(1)
2
Total$3,892
$857
$989
$770
$157
(a)For Southern Company and Mississippi Power, includes $50 million in revenue bonds classified as short term at December 31, 2017 that were remarketed in an index rate mode subsequent to December 31, 2017. Also for Southern Company and Mississippi Power, includes $40 million in pollution control revenue bonds classified as short term since they are variable rate demand obligations supported by short-term credit facilities; however, the final maturity dates range from 2020 to 2028.
(b)Represents unamortized debt related amounts, acquisition accounting fair value adjustments, and fair value hedges. See Note 14 for additional information regarding fair value hedges.
Maturities of long-term debt for the next five years are as follows:
 
Southern Company(a)
Alabama Power
Georgia
Power(a)
Mississippi Power
Southern Power(b)
Southern Company
Gas
 (in millions)
2019$3,156
$200
$621
$
$600
$350
20204,041
250
1,006
307
825

20213,186
310
375
270
300
330
20221,974
750
505

677
46
20232,388
300
153

290
400
(a)
Amounts include principal amortization related to the FFB borrowings beginning in 2020; however, the final maturity date is February 20, 2044. See "Long-term DebtDOE Loan Guarantee Borrowings" herein for additional information.
(b)Southern Power's 2022 maturity represents euro-denominated debt at the U.S. dollar denominated hedge settlement amount.

COMBINED NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)
Southern Company and Subsidiary Companies 2018 Annual Report

Long-term Debt
Senior Notes
Total senior notes (including amounts due within one year) outstanding at December 31, 2018 and 2017 were as follows:
 
Southern
Company
(a)
Alabama PowerGeorgia
Power
Mississippi PowerSouthern Power
Southern Company
 Gas(b)
 (in millions)
December 31, 2018$32,725
$6,875
$5,600
$1,200
$5,050
$4,000
December 31, 201735,148
6,375
7,100
755
5,459
4,157
(a)Includes $10.0 billion and $10.2 billion of senior notes at the Southern Company parent entity at December 31, 2018 and 2017, respectively.
(b)
Represents senior notes issued by Southern Company Gas Capital, which are fully and unconditionally guaranteed by Southern Company Gas. See "Structural Considerations" herein for additional information.
See Note 14 for information regarding fair value hedges of existing senior notes.
Except as otherwise described herein, Southern Company and its subsidiaries used the proceeds of 2018 senior note issuances for long-term debt redemptions and maturities, to repay short-term indebtedness, and for general corporate purposes, including working capital. The subsidiaries also used the proceeds for their construction programs.
In August 2018, Southern Company issued $750 million aggregate principal amount of Series 2018A Floating Rate Senior Notes due February 14, 2020 bearing interest based on three-month LIBOR.
Subsequent to December 31, 2018, through cash tender offers, Southern Company repurchased and retired approximately $522 million of the $1.0 billion aggregate principal amount outstanding of its 1.85% Senior Notes due July 1, 2019 (1.85% Notes), approximately $180 million of the $350 million aggregate principal amount outstanding of its Series 2014B 2.15% Senior Notes due September 1, 2019 (Series 2014B Notes), and approximately $504 million of the $750 million aggregate principal amount outstanding of its Series 2018A Floating Rate Notes due February 14, 2020 (Series 2018A Notes), for an aggregate purchase price, excluding accrued and unpaid interest, of approximately $1.2 billion. In addition, subsequent to December 31, 2018, and following the completion of the cash tender offers, Southern Company completed the redemption of all of the Series 2018A Notes remaining outstanding and called for redemption all of the 1.85% Notes and Series 2014B Notes remaining outstanding.
In June 2018, Alabama Power issued $500 million aggregate principal amount of Series 2018A 4.30% Senior Notes due July 15, 2048.
In April 2018, Georgia Power redeemed all $250 million aggregate principal amount of its Series 2008B 5.40% Senior Notes due June 1, 2018.
In May 2018, through cash tender offers, Georgia Power repurchased and retired $89 million of the $250 million aggregate principal amount outstanding of its Series 2007A 5.65% Senior Notes due March 1, 2037, $326 million of the $500 million aggregate principal amount outstanding of its Series 2009A 5.95% Senior Notes due February 1, 2039, and $335 million of the $600 million aggregate principal amount outstanding of its Series 2010B 5.40% Senior Notes due June 1, 2040, for an aggregate purchase price, excluding accrued and unpaid interest, of $902 million.
In March 2018, Mississippi Power issued $300 million aggregate principal amount of Series 2018A Floating Rate Senior Notes due March 27, 2020 bearing interest based on three-month LIBOR and $300 million aggregate principal amount of Series 2018B 3.95% Senior Notes due March 30, 2028.
In October 2018, Mississippi Power completed the redemption of all $30 million aggregate principal amount outstanding of its Series G 5.40% Senior Notes due July 1, 2035 and all $125 million aggregate principal amount outstanding of its Series 2009A 5.55% Senior Notes due March 1, 2019.

COMBINED NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)
Southern Company and Subsidiary Companies 2018 Annual Report

Junior Subordinated Notes
Total junior subordinated notes outstanding for Southern Company and Georgia Power at December 31, 2018 and 2017 were as follows:
 
Southern
Company
(*)
Georgia
Power
 (in millions)
December 31, 2018$3,570
$270
December 31, 20173,570
270
(*)Includes $3.3 billion of junior subordinated notes at the Southern Company parent entity at both December 31, 2018 and 2017.
Pollution Control Revenue Bonds
Pollution control revenue bond obligations represent loans to the traditional electric operating companies from public authorities of funds derived from sales by such authorities of revenue bonds issued to finance pollution control and solid waste disposal facilities. In some cases, the pollution control revenue bond obligations represent obligations under installment sales agreements with respect to facilities constructed with the proceeds of revenue bonds issued by public authorities. The traditional electric operating companies are required to make payments sufficient for the authorities to meet principal and interest requirements of such bonds. Proceeds from certain issuances are restricted until qualifying expenditures are incurred. Total tax-exempt pollution control revenue bond obligations (including amounts due within one year) outstanding at December 31, 2018 and 2017 were as follows:
 
Southern
Company
Alabama
Power
Georgia
Power
Mississippi Power
 (in millions)
December 31, 2018$2,585
$1,060
$1,460
$40
December 31, 20173,297
1,060
1,821
83
In October 2018, Alabama Power purchased and held $120 million aggregate principal amount of The Industrial Development Board of the City of Mobile, Alabama Pollution Control Revenue Bonds (Alabama Power Company Plant Barry Project), Series 2008. Alabama Power reoffered these bonds to the public in November 2018.
During 2018, Georgia Power purchased and held the following pollution control revenue bonds, which may be reoffered to the public at a later date:
approximately $105 million aggregate principal amount of Development Authority of Burke County (Georgia) Pollution Control Revenue Bonds (Georgia Power Company Plant Vogtle Project), First Series 2013
$173 million aggregate principal amount of Development Authority of Bartow County (Georgia) Pollution Control Revenue Bonds (Georgia Power Company Plant Bowen Project), First Series 2009
$55 million aggregate principal amount of Development Authority of Burke County (Georgia) Pollution Control Revenue Bonds (Georgia Power Company Plant Vogtle Project), Fifth Series 1994
$65 million aggregate principal amount of Development Authority of Burke County (Georgia) Pollution Control Revenue Bonds (Georgia Power Company Plant Vogtle Project), Second Series 2008
approximately $72 million aggregate principal amount of Development Authority of Bartow County (Georgia) Pollution Control Revenue Bonds (Georgia Power Company Plant Bowen Project), First Series 2013
In December 2018, the Development Authority of Burke County (Georgia) issued approximately $108 million aggregate principal amount of Pollution Control Revenue Bonds (Georgia Power Company Plant Vogtle Project), First Series 2018 due November 1, 2052 for the benefit of Georgia Power. The proceeds were used to redeem, in January 2019, approximately $13 million, $20 million, and $75 million aggregate principal amount of Development Authority of Burke County (Georgia) Pollution Control Revenue Bonds (Georgia Power Company Plant Vogtle Project), First Series 1992, Eighth Series 1994, and Second Series 1995, respectively.
In July 2018, Mississippi Power purchased and held approximately $43 million aggregate principal amount of Mississippi Business Finance Corporation Pollution Control Revenue Refunding Bonds, Series 2002. Mississippi Power may reoffer these bonds to the public at a later date.

COMBINED NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)
Southern Company and Subsidiary Companies 2018 Annual Report

Bank Term Loans
Total long-term bank term loans (including amounts due within one year) outstanding at December 31, 2018 and 2017 were as follows:
 
Southern
Company
Alabama PowerGeorgia
Power
Mississippi PowerSouthern Power
 (in millions)
December 31, 2018$145
$45
$
$
$
December 31, 20171,465
45
100
900
420
See "Notes Payable" herein for additional information regarding bank term loans.
In January 2018, Georgia Power repaid its outstanding $100 million floating rate bank loan due October 26, 2018.
In March 2018, Mississippi Power repaid at maturity a $900 million unsecured term loan.
In May 2018, Southern Power repaid $420 million aggregate principal amount of long-term floating rate bank loans.
In November 2018, SEGCO, as borrower, and Alabama Power, as guarantor, entered into a $100 million long-term delayed draw floating rate bank term loan bearing interest based on three-month LIBOR, which SEGCO used to repay at maturity $100 million aggregate principal amount of Series 2013A Senior Notes. See Note 9 under "Guarantees" for additional information.
DOE Loan Guarantee Borrowings
Pursuant to the loan guarantee program established under Title XVII of the Energy Policy Act of 2005 (Title XVII Loan Guarantee Program), Georgia Power and the DOE entered into the Loan Guarantee Agreement in 2014, under which the DOE agreed to guarantee the obligations of Georgia Power under a note purchase agreement (FFB Note Purchase Agreement) among the DOE, Georgia Power, and the FFB and a related promissory note (FFB Promissory Note). The FFB Note Purchase Agreement and the FFB Promissory Note provide for a multi-advance term loan facility (FFB Credit Facility), under which Georgia Power may make term loan borrowings through the FFB.
In July 2017, Georgia Power entered into an amendment to the Loan Guarantee Agreement (LGA Amendment) in connection with the DOE's consent to Georgia Power's entry into the Vogtle Services Agreement and the related intellectual property licenses (IP Licenses).
Under the terms of the Loan Guarantee Agreement, upon termination of the Vogtle 3 and 4 Agreement, further advances are conditioned upon the DOE's approval of any agreements entered into in replacement of the Vogtle 3 and 4 Agreement. Under the terms of the LGA Amendment, Georgia Power will not request any advances unless and until certain conditions are satisfied, including (i) receipt of the DOE's approval of the Bechtel Agreement (together with the Vogtle Services Agreement and the IP Licenses, the Replacement EPC Arrangements) and (ii) Georgia Power's entry into a further amendment to the Loan Guarantee Agreement with the DOE to reflect the Replacement EPC Arrangements.
Proceeds of advances made under the FFB Credit Facility are used to reimburse Georgia Power for Eligible Project Costs. Aggregate borrowings under the FFB Credit Facility may not exceed the lesser of (i) 70% of Eligible Project Costs or (ii) approximately $3.46 billion.
In September 2017, the DOE issued a conditional commitment to Georgia Power for up to approximately $1.67 billion of additional guaranteed loans under the Loan Guarantee Agreement. This conditional commitment expires on March 31, 2019, subject to any further extension approved by the DOE. Final approval and issuance of these additional loan guarantees by the DOE cannot be assured and are subject to the negotiation of definitive agreements, completion of due diligence by the DOE, receipt of any necessary regulatory approvals, and satisfaction of other conditions.
All borrowings under the FFB Credit Facility are full recourse to Georgia Power, and Georgia Power is obligated to reimburse the DOE for any payments the DOE is required to make to the FFB under the guarantee. Georgia Power's reimbursement obligations to the DOE are full recourse and secured by a first priority lien on (i) Georgia Power's 45.7% undivided ownership interest in Plant Vogtle Units 3 and 4 (primarily the units under construction, the related real property, and any nuclear fuel loaded in the reactor core) and (ii) Georgia Power's rights and obligations under the principal contracts relating to Plant Vogtle Units 3 and 4. There are no restrictions on Georgia Power's ability to grant liens on other property.
In addition to the conditions described above, future advances are subject to satisfaction of customary conditions, as well as certification of compliance with the requirements of the Title XVII Loan Guarantee Program, including accuracy of project-related representations and warranties, delivery of updated project-related information, and evidence of compliance with the

COMBINED NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)
Southern Company and Subsidiary Companies 2018 Annual Report

prevailing wage requirements of the Davis-Bacon Act of 1931, as amended, and certification from the DOE's consulting engineer that proceeds of the advances are used to reimburse Eligible Project Costs.
Upon satisfaction of all conditions described above, advances may be requested under the FFB Credit Facility on a quarterly basis through 2020. The final maturity date for each advance under the FFB Credit Facility is February 20, 2044. Interest is payable quarterly and principal payments will begin on February 20, 2020. Borrowings under the FFB Credit Facility will bear interest at the applicable U.S. Treasury rate plus a spread equal to 0.375%.
At both December 31, 2018 and 2017, Georgia Power had $2.6 billion of borrowings outstanding under the FFB Credit Facility.
Under the Loan Guarantee Agreement, Georgia Power is subject to customary borrower affirmative and negative covenants and events of default. In addition, Georgia Power is subject to project-related reporting requirements and other project-specific covenants and events of default.
In the event certain mandatory prepayment events (including any decision not to continue construction of Plant Vogtle Units 3 and 4) occur, the FFB's commitment to make further advances under the FFB Credit Facility will terminate and Georgia Power will be required to prepay the outstanding principal amount of all borrowings under the FFB Credit Facility over a period of five years (with level principal amortization). Among other things, these mandatory prepayment events include (i) the termination of the Vogtle Services Agreement or rejection of the Vogtle Services Agreement in bankruptcy if Georgia Power does not maintain access to intellectual property rights under the IP Licenses; (ii) a decision by Georgia Power not to continue construction of Plant Vogtle Units 3 and 4; (iii) cancellation of Plant Vogtle Units 3 and 4 by the Georgia PSC, or by Georgia Power if authorized by the Georgia PSC; and (iv) cost disallowances by the Georgia PSC that could have a material adverse effect on completion of Plant Vogtle Units 3 and 4 or Georgia Power's ability to repay the outstanding borrowings under the FFB Credit Facility. Under certain circumstances, insurance proceeds and any proceeds from an event of taking must be applied to immediately prepay outstanding borrowings under the FFB Credit Facility. In addition, if Georgia Power discontinues construction of Plant Vogtle Units 3 and 4, Georgia Power would be obligated to immediately repay a portion of the outstanding borrowings under the FFB Credit Facility to the extent such outstanding borrowings exceed 70% of Eligible Project Costs, net of the proceeds received by Georgia Power under the Guarantee Settlement Agreement. Georgia Power also may voluntarily prepay outstanding borrowings under the FFB Credit Facility. Under the FFB Credit Facility, any prepayment (whether mandatory or optional) will be made with a make-whole premium or discount, as applicable.
In connection with any cancellation of Plant Vogtle Units 3 and 4 that results in a mandatory prepayment event, the DOE may elect to continue construction of Plant Vogtle Units 3 and 4. In such an event, the DOE will have the right to assume Georgia Power's rights and obligations under the principal agreements relating to Plant Vogtle Units 3 and 4 and to acquire all or a portion of Georgia Power's ownership interest in Plant Vogtle Units 3 and 4.
Other Long-Term Debt
Alabama Power
Alabama Power has formed a wholly-owned trust subsidiary for the purpose of issuing preferred securities. The proceeds of the related equity investments and preferred security sales were loaned back to Alabama Power through the issuance of junior subordinated notes totaling $206 million outstanding at December 31, 2018 and 2017, which constitute substantially all of the assets of this trust and are reflected in the balance sheets as long-term debt payable. Alabama Power considers that the mechanisms and obligations relating to the preferred securities issued for its benefit, taken together, constitute a full and unconditional guarantee by it of the trust's payment obligations with respect to these securities. At December 31, 2018 and 2017, trust preferred securities of $200 million were outstanding. See Note 1 under "Variable Interest Entities" for additional information on the accounting treatment for this trust and the related securities.
Mississippi Power
At December 31, 2018 and 2017, Mississippi Power had $270 million aggregate principal amount outstanding of Mississippi Business Finance Corporation Taxable Revenue Bonds, 7.13% Series 1999A due October 20, 2021. Mississippi Power assumed the obligations in 2011 in connection with its election under its operating lease of Plant Daniel Units 3 and 4 to purchase the assets. The bonds were recorded at fair value at the date of assumption, or $346 million, reflecting a premium of $76 million. See "Secured Debt" herein for additional information.
At December 31, 2018 and 2017, Mississippi Power had $50 million of tax-exempt revenue bond obligations outstanding representing loans to Mississippi Power from a public authority of funds derived from the sale by such authority of revenue bonds issued to finance a portion of the costs of constructing the Kemper County energy facility.

COMBINED NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)
Southern Company and Subsidiary Companies 2018 Annual Report

Southern Company Gas
At December 31, 2018 and 2017, Nicor Gas had $1.3 billion and $1.0 billion, respectively, of first mortgage bonds outstanding. These bonds have been issued with maturities ranging from 2019 to 2058. See "Secured Debt" herein for additional information.
Prior to its sale, in the second quarter 2018, Pivotal Utility Holdings caused $200 million aggregate principal amount of gas facility revenue bonds to be redeemed.
Nicor Gas issued $300 million aggregate principal amount of first mortgage bonds in a private placement, of which $100 million was issued in August 2018 and $200 million was issued in November 2018.
At both December 31, 2018 and 2017, Atlanta Gas Light had $159 million of medium-term notes outstanding.
Capital Leases
Assets acquired under capital leases are recorded in the balance sheets as property, plant, and equipment and the related obligations are classified as long-term debt. See Note 5 under "Capital Leases" for additional information.
Southern Company
At December 31, 2018 and 2017, SCS had capital lease obligations of approximately $178 million and $177 million, respectively, for an office building and certain computer equipment including desktops, laptops, servers, printers, and storage devices with annual interest rates that range from 1.6% to 4.7%.
Georgia Power
At December 31, 2018 and 2017, Georgia Power had a capital lease obligation for its corporate headquarters building of $15 million and $22 million, respectively, with an annual interest rate of 7.9%. For ratemaking purposes, the Georgia PSC has allowed the lease payments in cost of service with no return on the capital lease asset. The difference between the depreciation and the lease payments allowed for ratemaking purposes is recovered as operating expenses as ordered by the Georgia PSC. The annual operating expense incurred for this capital lease was not material for any year presented.
At December 31, 2018 and 2017, Georgia Power had capital lease obligations related to two affiliate PPAs with Southern Power of $128 million and $132 million, respectively. The annual interest rates range from 11% to 12% for these two capital lease PPAs. For ratemaking purposes, the Georgia PSC has included the capital lease asset amortization in cost of service and the interest in Georgia Power's cost of debt. See Note 1 under "Affiliate Transactions" and Note 9 under "Fuel and Power Purchase AgreementsAffiliate" for additional information.
Secured Debt
Each of Southern Company's subsidiaries is organized as a legal entity, separate and apart from Southern Company and its other subsidiaries. There are no agreements or other arrangements among the Southern Company system companies under which the assets of one company have been pledged or otherwise made available to satisfy obligations of Southern Company or any of its other subsidiaries.
Outstanding secured debt at December 31, 2018 and 2017 for the applicable registrants was as follows:
 
Georgia
Power
(a)
Mississippi
 Power(b)
Southern
Company
 Gas(c)
 (in millions)
December 31, 2018$2,767
$270
$1,325
December 31, 20172,779
270
1,025
(a)
Includes Georgia Power's FFB loans that are secured by a first priority lien on (i) Georgia Power's 45.7% undivided ownership interest in Plant Vogtle Units 3 and 4 (primarily the units under construction, the related real property, and any nuclear fuel loaded in the reactor core) and (ii) Georgia Power's rights and obligations under the principal contracts relating to Plant Vogtle Units 3 and 4. These borrowings totaled $2.6 billion at both December 31, 2018 and 2017. See "Long-term DebtDOE Loan Guarantee Borrowings" herein for additional information. Also includes capital lease obligations of $142 million and $154 million at December 31, 2018 and 2017, respectively. See "Long-term DebtCapital LeasesGeorgia Power" herein for additional information.
(b)
The revenue bonds assumed in conjunction with Mississippi Power's purchase of Plant Daniel Units 3 and 4 are secured by Plant Daniel Units 3 and 4 and certain related personal property. See "Long-term DebtOther Long-Term Debt" herein for additional information.
(c)
Nicor Gas' first mortgage bonds are secured by substantially all of Nicor Gas' properties. See "Long-term DebtOther Long-Term DebtSouthern Company Gas" herein for additional information.

COMBINED NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)
Southern Company and Subsidiary Companies 2018 Annual Report

At December 31, 2018 and 2017, Gulf Power had $41 million of secured debt related to a lien on its property at Plant Daniel in connection with the issuance of two series of its pollution control revenue bonds, which are included in liabilities held for sale on Southern Company's balance sheet at December 31, 2018. On January 1, 2019, Southern Company completed its sale of Gulf Power to NextEra Energy. See Note 15 under "Southern Company's Sale of Gulf Power" for additional information.
Each registrant's senior notes, junior subordinated notes, pollution control and other revenue bond obligations, bank term loans, credit facility borrowings, and notes payable are effectively subordinated to all secured debt of each respective registrant.
Bank Credit Arrangements
At December 31, 2018, committed credit arrangements with banks were as follows:
 Expires   Executable Term Loans 
Expires Within
One Year
Company2019 2020 2022 Total 
Unused(d)
 
One
Year
 
Two
Years
 Term Out No Term Out
 (in millions)
Southern Company(a)
$
 $
 $2,000
 $2,000
 $1,999
 $
 $
 $
 $
Alabama Power33
 500
 800
 1,333
 1,333
 
 
 
 33
Georgia Power
 
 1,750
 1,750
 1,736
 
 
 
 
Mississippi Power100
 
 
 100
 100
 
 
 
 100
Southern Power(b)

 
 750
 750
 727
 
 
 
 
Southern Company Gas(c)

 
 1,900
 1,900
 1,895
 
 
 
 
Other30
 
 
 30
 30
 
 
 
 30
Southern Company Consolidated(e)
$163
 $500
 $7,200
 $7,863
 $7,820
 $
 $
 $
 $163
(a)Represents the Southern Company parent entity.
(b)Southern Power's subsidiaries are not parties to its bank credit arrangement.
(c)
Southern Company Gas provides a parent guarantee of the obligations of its subsidiary Southern Company Gas Capital, which is the borrower of $1.4 billion ($1.395 billion unused) of this arrangement. Southern Company Gas' committed credit arrangement also includes $500 million (all unused) for which Nicor Gas is the borrower and which is restricted for working capital needs of Nicor Gas. Pursuant to this multi-year credit arrangement, the allocations between Southern Company Gas Capital and Nicor Gas may be adjusted. See "Structural Considerations" herein for additional information.
(d)Amounts used are for letters of credit.
(e)
Excludes $280 million of committed credit arrangements of Gulf Power, which was sold on January 1, 2019. See Note 15 under "Southern Company's Sale of Gulf Power" for additional information.
Most of the bank credit arrangements require payment of commitment fees based on the unused portion of the commitments or the maintenance of compensating balances with the banks. Commitment fees average less than 1/4 of 1% for Southern Company, the traditional electric operating companies, Southern Power, Southern Company Gas, and Nicor Gas. Compensating balances are not legally restricted from withdrawal.
Subject to applicable market conditions, Southern Company and its subsidiaries expect to renew or replace their bank credit arrangements as needed, prior to expiration. In connection therewith, Southern Company and its subsidiaries may extend the maturity dates and/or increase or decrease the lending commitments thereunder.
Southern Company's, Southern Company Gas', and Nicor Gas' credit arrangements contain covenants that limit debt levels to 70% of total capitalization, as defined in the agreements, and most of the other subsidiaries' bank credit arrangements contain covenants that limit debt levels to 65% of total capitalization, as defined in the agreements. For purposes of these definitions, debt excludes the long-term debt payable to affiliated trusts and, in certain arrangements, other hybrid securities. Additionally, for Southern Company and Southern Power, for purposes of these definitions, debt would exclude any project debt incurred by certain subsidiaries of Southern Power to the extent such debt is non-recourse to Southern Power and capitalization would exclude the capital stock or other equity attributable to such subsidiaries. At December 31, 2018, Southern Company, the traditional electric operating companies, Southern Power, Southern Company Gas, and Nicor Gas were each in compliance with their respective debt limit covenants.
A portion of the unused credit with banks is allocated to provide liquidity support to the revenue bonds of the traditional electric operating companies and the commercial paper programs of Southern Company, the traditional electric operating companies, Southern Power, Southern Company Gas, and Nicor Gas. The amount of variable rate revenue bonds of the traditional electric

COMBINED NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)
Southern Company and Subsidiary Companies 2018 Annual Report

operating companies outstanding requiring liquidity support at December 31, 2018 was approximately $1.6 billion (comprised of approximately $854 million at Alabama Power, $659 million at Georgia Power, $82 million at Gulf Power, and $40 million at Mississippi Power). In addition, at December 31, 2018, the traditional electric operating companies had approximately $403 million (comprised of approximately $345 million at Georgia Power and $58 million at Gulf Power) of revenue bonds outstanding that are required to be remarketed within the next 12 months. See Note 15 under "Southern Company's Sale of Gulf Power" for information regarding the sale of Gulf Power on January 1, 2019. Subsequent to December 31, 2018, Georgia Power redeemed approximately $108 million of obligations related to outstanding variable rate pollution control revenue bonds.
In addition to its credit arrangement described above, Southern Power also has a $120 million continuing letter of credit facility expiring in 2021 for standby letters of credit. At December 31, 2018, $103 million has been used for letters of credit, primarily as credit support for PPA requirements, and $17 million was unused. At December 31, 2017, the total amount available under this facility was $19 million. Southern Power's subsidiaries are not parties to this letter of credit facility. Also, at December 31, 2018 and 2017, Southern Power had $103 million and $113 million, respectively, of cash collateral posted related to PPA requirements, which is included in other deferred charges and assets in Southern Power's consolidated balance sheets.
Notes Payable
Southern Company, Alabama Power, Georgia Power, Southern Power, Southern Company Gas, Nicor Gas, and SEGCO make short-term borrowings primarily through commercial paper programs that have the liquidity support of the committed bank credit arrangements described above under "Bank Credit Arrangements." Southern Power's subsidiaries are not parties to its commercial paper program. Southern Company Gas maintains commercial paper programs at Southern Company Gas Capital and at Nicor Gas. Nicor Gas' commercial paper program supports working capital needs at Nicor Gas as Nicor Gas is not permitted to make money pool loans to affiliates. All of Southern Company Gas' other subsidiaries benefit from Southern Company Gas Capital's commercial paper program. See "Structural Considerations" herein for additional information.
In addition, Southern Company and certain of its subsidiaries have entered into various bank term loan agreements. Unless otherwise stated, the proceeds of these loans were used to repay existing indebtedness and for general corporate purposes, including working capital and, for the subsidiaries, their continuous construction programs.

COMBINED NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)
Southern Company and Subsidiary Companies 2018 Annual Report

Commercial paper and short-term bank term loans are included in notes payable in the balance sheets. Details of short-term borrowings were as follows:
 Notes Payable at December 31, 2018 Notes Payable at December 31, 2017
 
Amount
Outstanding
 
Weighted Average
Interest Rate
 
Amount
Outstanding
 
Weighted Average
Interest Rate
 (in millions)   (in millions)  
Southern Company       
Commercial paper$1,064
 3.0% $1,832
 1.8%
Short-term bank debt1,851
 3.1% 607
 2.3%
Total$2,915
 3.1% $2,439
 1.9%
        
Alabama Power       
Short-term bank debt$
 % $3
 3.7%
        
Georgia Power       
Commercial paper$294
 3.1% $
 %
Short-term bank debt
 % 150
 2.2%
Total$294
 3.1% $150
 2.2%
        
Mississippi Power       
Short-term bank debt$
 % $4
 3.8%
        
Southern Power       
Commercial paper$
 % $105
 2.0%
Short-term bank debt100
 3.1% 
 %
Total$100
 3.1% $105
 2.0%
        
Southern Company Gas       
Commercial paper:       
Southern Company Gas Capital$403
 3.1% $1,243
 1.7%
Nicor Gas247
 3.0% 275
 1.8%
Total$650
 3.0% $1,518
 1.8%
The outstanding bank term loans at December 31, 2018 have covenants that limit debt levels to a percentage of total capitalization. The percentage is 70% for Southern Company and 65% for Alabama Power and Southern Power, as defined in the agreements. For purposes of these definitions, debt excludes any long-term debt payable to affiliated trusts and other hybrid securities. Additionally, for Southern Company and Southern Power, for purposes of these definitions, debt excludes any project debt incurred by certain subsidiaries of Southern Power to the extent such debt is non-recourse to Southern Power and capitalization excludes the capital stock or other equity attributable to such subsidiary. At December 31, 2018, each of Southern Company, Alabama Power, and Southern Power was in compliance with its debt limits.
Except as otherwise described herein, Southern Company and its subsidiaries used the proceeds of bank loans for long-term debt redemptions and maturities, to repay short-term indebtedness, and for general corporate purposes, including working capital.
In March 2018, Southern Company entered into a $900 million short-term floating rate bank loan bearing interest based on one-month LIBOR, which was repaid in August 2018.
In April 2018, Southern Company borrowed $250 million pursuant to a short-term uncommitted bank credit arrangement, bearing interest at a rate agreed upon by Southern Company and the bank from time to time and payable on no less than 30 days' demand by the bank. Subsequent to December 31, 2018, Southern Company repaid this loan.
In June 2018, Southern Company repaid at maturity two $100 million short-term floating rate bank term loans.

COMBINED NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)
Southern Company and Subsidiary Companies 2018 Annual Report

In August 2018, Southern Company entered into a $1.5 billion short-term floating rate bank loan bearing interest based on one-month LIBOR, and repaid $250 million borrowed in August 2017 pursuant to a short-term uncommitted bank credit arrangement. Subsequent to December 31, 2018, Southern Company repaid this loan.
In January 2018, Georgia Power repaid its outstanding $150 million floating rate bank loan due May 31, 2018.
In March 2018, Mississippi Power entered into a $300 million short-term floating rate bank loan bearing interest based on one-month LIBOR, of which $200 million was repaid in the second quarter 2018 and $100 million was repaid in the third quarter 2018.
In May 2018, Southern Power entered into two short-term floating rate bank loans, each for an aggregate principal amount of $100 million, which bear interest based on one-month LIBOR. In November 2018, Southern Power repaid one of these short-term loans.
In January 2018, Southern Company Gas issued a floating rate promissory note to Southern Company in an aggregate principal amount of $100 million bearing interest based on one-month LIBOR. In March 2018, Southern Company Gas repaid this promissory note.
In April 2018, Pivotal Utility Holdings, as borrower, and Southern Company Gas, as guarantor, entered into a $181 million short-term delayed draw floating rate bank term loan bearing interest based on one-month LIBOR. In July 2018, Pivotal Utility Holdings repaid this short-term loan.
In May 2018, Southern Company Gas Capital borrowed $95 million pursuant to a short-term uncommitted bank credit arrangement, guaranteed by Southern Company Gas, bearing interest at a rate agreed upon by Southern Company Gas Capital and the bank from time to time and payable on no less than 30 days' demand by the bank. In July 2018, Southern Company Gas Capital repaid this loan.
Outstanding Classes of Capital Stock
Southern Company
Common Stock
Stock Issued
During 2018, Southern Company issued approximately 11.6 million shares of common stock primarily through employee equity compensation plans and received proceeds of approximately $442 million.
In addition, during the third and fourth quarters 2018, Southern Company issued a total of approximately 12.1 million and 2.5 million shares, respectively, of common stock through at-the-market issuances pursuant to sales agency agreements related to Southern Company's continuous equity offering program and received cash proceeds of approximately $540 million and $108 million, respectively, net of $5 million and $1 million in commissions, respectively.
Shares Reserved
At December 31, 2018, a total of 92 million shares were reserved for issuance pursuant to the Southern Investment Plan, employee savings plans, the Outside Directors Stock Plan, the Omnibus Incentive Compensation Plan (which includes stock options and performance share units as discussed in Note 12), and an at-the-market program. Of the total 92 million shares reserved, there were 10 million shares of common stock remaining available for awards under the Omnibus Incentive Compensation Plan at December 31, 2018.

COMBINED NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)
Southern Company and Subsidiary Companies 2018 Annual Report

Diluted Earnings Per Share
For Southern Company, the only difference in computing basic and diluted earnings per share (EPS) is attributable to awards outstanding under the stock option and performance share plans. The effect of both stock options and performance share award units was determined using the treasury stock method. Shares used to compute diluted EPS were as follows:
 Average Common Stock Shares
 2018 2017 2016
 (in millions)
As reported shares1,020
 1,000
 951
Effect of options and performance share award units5
 8
 7
Diluted shares1,025
 1,008
 958
Stock options and performance share award units that were not included in the diluted EPS calculation because they were anti-dilutive were immaterial in all years presented.
Redeemable Preferred Stock of Subsidiaries
Prior to 2017, each of the traditional electric operating companies had outstanding preferred and/or preference stock. During 2017, Alabama Power and Gulf Power redeemed all of their outstanding preference stock and Georgia Power redeemed all of its outstanding preferred and preference stock. During 2018, Mississippi Power redeemed all of its outstanding preferred stock. The remaining preferred stock of Alabama Power contains a feature that allows the holders to elect a majority of such subsidiary's board of directors if preferred dividends are not paid for four consecutive quarters. Because such a potential redemption-triggering event is not solely within the control of Alabama Power, this preferred stock is presented as "Redeemable Preferred Stock of Subsidiaries" on Southern Company's balance sheets and statements of capitalization in a manner consistent with temporary equity under applicable accounting standards.
The following table presents changes during the year in redeemable preferred stock of subsidiaries for Southern Company:
 Redeemable Preferred Stock of Subsidiaries
 (in millions)
Balance at December 31, 2015 and 2016:$118
Issued(a)
250
Redeemed(a)
(38)
Issuance costs(a)
(6)
Balance at December 31, 2017:324
Redeemed(b)
(33)
Balance at December 31, 2018:$291
(a)
See "Alabama Power" herein for additional information.
(b)
See "Mississippi Power" herein for additional information.
Alabama Power
Alabama Power has preferred stock, Class A preferred stock, and common stock outstanding. Alabama Power also has authorized preference stock, none of which is outstanding. Alabama Power's preferred stock and Class A preferred stock, without preference between classes, rank senior to Alabama Power's common stock with respect to payment of dividends and voluntary and involuntary dissolution. The preferred stock and Class A preferred stock of Alabama Power contain a feature that allows the holders to elect a majority of Alabama Power's board of directors if preferred dividends are not paid for four consecutive quarters. Because such a potential redemption-triggering event is not solely within the control of Alabama Power, the preferred stock and Class A preferred stock is presented as "Redeemable Preferred Stock" on Alabama Power's balance sheets and statements of capitalization in a manner consistent with temporary equity under applicable accounting standards.
Alabama Power's preferred stock is subject to redemption at a price equal to the par value plus a premium. Alabama Power's Class A preferred stock is subject to redemption at a price equal to the stated capital. All series of Alabama Power's preferred stock currently are subject to redemption at the option of Alabama Power. The Class A preferred stock is subject to redemption on or

COMBINED NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)
Southern Company and Subsidiary Companies 2018 Annual Report

after October 1, 2022, or following the occurrence of a rating agency event. Information for each outstanding series is in the table below:
Preferred StockPar Value/Stated Capital Per Share Shares Outstanding 
Redemption
Price Per Share
4.92% Preferred Stock$100 80,000
 $103.23
4.72% Preferred Stock$100 50,000
 $102.18
4.64% Preferred Stock$100 60,000
 $103.14
4.60% Preferred Stock$100 100,000
 $104.20
4.52% Preferred Stock$100 50,000
 $102.93
4.20% Preferred Stock$100 135,115
 $105.00
5.00% Class A Preferred Stock$25 10,000,000
 
Stated Capital(*)
(*)Prior to October 1, 2022: $25.50; on or after October 1, 2022: Stated Capital
In September 2017, Alabama Power issued 10 million shares ($250 million aggregate stated capital) of 5.00% Class A Preferred Stock, Cumulative, Par Value $1 Per Share (Stated Capital $25 Per Share). The proceeds were used in October 2017 to redeem all 2 million shares ($50 million aggregate stated capital) of 6.50% Series Preference Stock, 6 million shares ($150 million aggregate stated capital) of 6.45% Series Preference Stock, and 1.52 million shares ($38 million aggregate stated capital) of 5.83% Class A Preferred Stock and for other general corporate purposes, including Alabama Power's continuous construction program.
There were no changes for the year ended December 31, 2018 in redeemable preferred stock of Alabama Power.
Georgia Power
Georgia Power has preferred stock, Class A preferred stock, preference stock, and common stock authorized, but only common stock outstanding as of December 31, 2018 and 2017. In October 2017, Georgia Power redeemed all 1.8 million shares ($45 million aggregate liquidation amount) of its 6.125% Series Class A Preferred Stock and 2.25 millionshares ($225 millionaggregate liquidation amount) of its 6.50% Series 2007A Preference Stock.
Mississippi Power
Mississippi Power has preferred stock and common stock authorized, but only common stock outstanding as of December 31, 2018. Mississippi Power previously had preferred stock that contained a feature allowing the holders to elect a majority of Mississippi Power's board of directors if preferred dividends were not paid for four consecutive quarters. Because such a potential redemption-triggering event was not solely within the control of Mississippi Power, this preferred stock was presented as "Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Stock" on Mississippi Power's balance sheets and statements of capitalization in a manner consistent with temporary equity under applicable accounting standards.
On October 23, 2018, Mississippi Power completed the redemption of all 8,867 outstanding shares ($886,700 aggregate par value) of its 4.40% Series Preferred Stock, all 8,643 outstanding shares ($864,300 aggregate par value) of its 4.60% Series Preferred Stock, all 16,700 outstanding shares ($1.67 million aggregate par value) of its 4.72% Series Preferred Stock, and all 1,200,000 outstanding depositary shares ($30 million aggregate stated value), each representing a 1/4th interest in a share of its 5.25% Series Preferred Stock.
Dividend Restrictions
The income of Southern Company is derived primarily from equity in earnings of its subsidiaries. At December 31, 2018, consolidated retained earnings included $4.9 billion of undistributed retained earnings of the subsidiaries.
The traditional electric operating companies and Southern Power can only pay dividends to Southern Company out of retained earnings or paid-in-capital.
See Note 7 under "Southern Power" for information regarding the distribution requirements for certain Southern Power subsidiaries.
The authority of the natural gas distribution utilities to pay dividends to Southern Company Gas is subject to regulation. By regulation, Nicor Gas is restricted, to the extent of its retained earnings balance, in the amount it can dividend or loan to affiliates and is not permitted to make money pool loans to affiliates. At December 31, 2018, the amount of Southern Company Gas' subsidiary retained earnings restricted for dividend payment totaled $814 million.

COMBINED NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)
Southern Company and Subsidiary Companies 2018 Annual Report

Structural Considerations
Since Southern Company and Southern Company Gas are holding companies, the right of Southern Company and Southern Company Gas and, hence, the right of creditors of Southern Company or Southern Company Gas to participate in any distribution of the assets of any respective subsidiary of Southern Company or Southern Company Gas, whether upon liquidation, reorganization or otherwise, is subject to prior claims of creditors and preferred stockholders of such subsidiary.
Southern Company Gas' 100%-owned subsidiary, Southern Company Gas Capital, was established to provide for certain of Southern Company Gas' ongoing financing needs through a commercial paper program, the issuance of various debt, hybrid securities, and other financing arrangements. Southern Company Gas fully and unconditionally guarantees all debt issued by Southern Company Gas Capital. Nicor Gas is not permitted by regulation to make loans to affiliates or utilize Southern Company Gas Capital for its financing needs.
Southern Power Company's senior notes, bank term loans, commercial paper, and bank credit arrangementare unsecured senior indebtedness, which rank equally with all other unsecured and unsubordinated debt of Southern Power Company. Southern Power's subsidiaries are not issuers, borrowers, or obligors, as applicable, under the senior notes, borrowings from financial institutions, commercial paper, or the bank credit arrangement. The senior notes, borrowings from financial institutions, commercial paper, and the bank credit arrangement are effectively subordinated to any future secured debt of Southern Power Company and any potential claims of creditors of Southern Power's subsidiaries.

COMBINED NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)
Southern Company and Subsidiary Companies 2018 Annual Report

9. COMMITMENTS
Fuel and Power Purchase Agreements
Non-Affiliate
To supply a portion of the fuel requirements of the Southern Company system's electric generating plants, the Southern Company system has entered into various long-term commitments not recognized on the balance sheets for the procurement and delivery of fossil fuel and, for Alabama Power and Georgia Power, nuclear fuel. Fuel expense in 2018, 2017, and 2016 for the Southern Company system is shown below, the majority of which was purchased under long-term commitments.
 Southern Company
Alabama
Power
Georgia
Power
Mississippi Power
Southern
Power
 (in millions)
2018$4,637
$1,301
$1,698
$405
$699
20174,400
1,225
1,671
395
621
20164,361
1,297
1,807
343
456
Each registrant expects that a substantial amount of its future fuel needs will continue to be purchased under long-term commitments.
The traditional electric operating companies have entered into various non-affiliate long-term PPAs, some of which are accounted for as leases. For Alabama Power and Georgia Power, most long-term PPAs include capacity and energy components. Mississippi Power's long-term PPAs are associated with solar facilities and only include an energy component. For the traditional electric operating companies, the energy-related costs associated with PPAs are recoverable through fuel cost recovery provisions.
Total capacity expense under these non-affiliate PPAs accounted for as operating leases in 2018, 2017, and 2016 was as follows:
 Southern Company
Alabama
Power
Georgia
Power
 (in millions)
2018$231
$44
$113
2017235
41
118
2016232
42
113
In addition, Georgia Power's non-affiliate energy-only solar PPAs accounted for as leases contained contingent rent expense of $43 million, $44 million, and $18 million for 2018, 2017, and 2016, respectively. Mississippi Power's energy-only solar PPAs accounted for as operating leases contained contingent rent expense of $10 million, $5 million, and an immaterial amount for 2018, 2017, and 2016, respectively. Contingent rents are recognized as services are performed.
Estimated total obligations under non-affiliate PPAs accounted for as operating leases at December 31, 2018 were as follows:
 Southern CompanyAlabama Power
Georgia
Power
 (in millions)
2019$161
$41
$120
2020164
42
122
2021168
44
124
2022171
46
125
2023127

127
2024 and thereafter642

642
Total$1,433
$173
$1,260
In addition, Georgia Power has commitments regarding a portion of a 5% interest in the original cost of Plant Vogtle Units 1 and 2 owned by MEAG Power that are in effect until the latter of the retirement of the plant or the latest stated maturity date of MEAG Power's bonds issued to finance such ownership interest. The payments for capacity are required whether or not any capacity is

COMBINED NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)
Southern Company and Subsidiary Companies 2018 Annual Report

available. The energy cost is a function of each unit's variable operating costs. Portions of the capacity payments relate to costs in excess of MEAG Power's Plant Vogtle Units 1 and 2 allowed investment for ratemaking purposes. The present value of these portions at the time of the disallowance was written off. Generally, the cost of such capacity and energy is included in purchased power in Southern Company's statements of income and in purchased power, non-affiliates in Georgia Power's statements of income. Georgia Power's capacity payments related to this commitment totaled $8 million, $9 million, and $11 million in 2018, 2017, and 2016, respectively. At December 31, 2018, Georgia Power's estimated long-term obligations related to this commitment totaled $59 million, consisting of $6 million for 2019, $5 million for 2020, $5 million for 2021, $4 million for 2022, $3 million for 2023, and $36 million for 2024 and thereafter.
SCS may enter into various types of wholesale energy and natural gas contracts acting as an agent for the traditional electric operating companies and Southern Power. Under these agreements, each of the traditional electric operating companies and Southern Power may be jointly and severally liable. Accordingly, Southern Company has entered into keep-well agreements with each of the traditional electric operating companies to ensure they will not subsidize or be responsible for any costs, losses, liabilities, or damages resulting from the inclusion of Southern Power as a contracting party under these agreements.
Affiliate
Georgia Power has also entered into affiliate long-term PPAs with Southern Power, some of which Georgia Power accounts for as leases. Georgia Power's total capacity expense under these affiliate PPAs accounted for as leases was $93 million, $107 million, and $133 million in 2018, 2017, and 2016, respectively. In addition, Georgia Power's energy-only solar PPAs with Southern Power accounted for as leases contained contingent rent expense of $29 million, $29 million, and $21 million for 2018, 2017, and 2016, respectively.
Georgia Power's estimated total obligations under affiliate PPAs accounted for as leases at December 31, 2018 were as follows:
 Georgia Power
 Affiliate Capital Lease PPAs 
Affiliate Operating
Lease PPAs
 (in millions)
2019$23
 $64
202023
 65
202124
 66
202224
 68
202325
 69
2024 and thereafter158
 349
Total$277
 $681
Less: amounts representing executory costs(a)
42
  
Net minimum lease payments235
  
Less: amounts representing interest(b)
105
  
Present value of net minimum lease payments$130
  
(a)
Executory costs such as taxes, maintenance, and insurance (including the estimated profit thereon) are estimated and included in total minimum lease payments.
(b)Calculated using an adjusted incremental borrowing rate to reduce the present value of the net minimum lease payments to fair value.
See Note 8 under "Long-term DebtCapital LeasesGeorgia Power" for additional information.
Pipeline Charges, Storage Capacity, and Gas Supply
Southern Company Gas has commitments for pipeline charges, storage capacity, and gas supply, which include charges recoverable through natural gas cost recovery mechanisms, or alternatively, billed to marketers selling retail natural gas, as well as demand charges associated with Southern Company Gas' wholesale gas services. Gas supply commitments include amounts for gas commodity purchases associated with Southern Company Gas' gas marketing services of 47 million mmBtu at floating gas prices calculated using forward natural gas prices at December 31, 2018 and valued at $150 million. Southern Company Gas provides guarantees to certain gas suppliers for certain of its subsidiaries in support of payment obligations.

COMBINED NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)
Southern Company and Subsidiary Companies 2018 Annual Report

Southern Company Gas' expected future contractual obligations for pipeline charges, storage capacity, and gas supply that are not recognized on the balance sheets at December 31, 2018 were as follows:
 Pipeline Charges, Storage Capacity, and Gas Supply
 (in millions)
2019$781
2020584
2021520
2022489
2023412
2024 and thereafter1,871
Total$4,657
Operating Leases
In addition to the operating lease PPAs discussed previously, the Southern Company system has operating lease agreements with various terms and expiration dates. The traditional electric operating companies' operating leases primarily relate to facilities, coal railcars, vehicles, cellular tower space, and other equipment. Southern Power's operating leases primarily relate to land for solar and wind facilities and are recognized on a straight-line basis over the minimum lease term, plus any renewal periods necessary to cover the expected life of the respective facility. Southern Company Gas' operating leases primarily relate to facilities and vehicles.
Total rent expense for 2018, 2017, and 2016 was as follows:
 
Southern Company(*)
Alabama Power
Georgia
Power
Mississippi Power
Southern Power(*)
 (in millions)
2018$192
$23
$34
$4
$31
2017176
25
31
3
29
2016169
18
28
3
22
(*)Includes contingent rent expense related to Southern Power's land leases based on wind production and escalation in the Consumer Price Index for All Urban Consumers.
 Southern Company Gas
 (in millions)
2018$15
201715
Successor – July 1, 2016 through December 31, 20168
Predecessor – January 1, 2016 through June 30, 20166

COMBINED NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)
Southern Company and Subsidiary Companies 2018 Annual Report

The registrants exclude contingent rent but include any step rents, fixed escalations, lease concessions, and lease extensions to cover the expected life of the facility in the computation of minimum lease payments. At December 31, 2018, estimated minimum lease payments under operating leases were as follows:
 Southern CompanyAlabama Power
Georgia
Power
Mississippi PowerSouthern Power
Southern Company
Gas
 (in millions)
2019$156
$12
$23
$3
$23
$18
2020134
10
18
2
24
16
2021110
7
9
1
24
15
202298
6
6
1
24
13
202379
3
5
1
26
10
2024 and thereafter1,040
1
13
2
874
34
Total$1,617
$39
$74
$10
$995
$106
For the traditional electric operating companies, a majority of the railcar and barge lease expenses are recoverable through fuel cost recovery provisions.
In addition to the above rental commitments, Alabama Power and Georgia Power have potential obligations upon expiration of certain railcar leases with respect to the residual value of the leased property. These leases have terms expiring in 2023 for Alabama Power and in 2024 for Georgia Power with maximum obligations under these leases of $12 million for Alabama Power and $9 million for Georgia Power. At the termination of the leases, Alabama Power and Georgia Power may renew the leases, exercise their purchase options, or the property can be sold to a third party. Alabama Power and Georgia Power expect that the fair market value of the leased property would substantially reduce or, for Alabama Power, potentially eliminate the loss under the residual value obligations.
Guarantees
Alabama Power has guaranteed unconditionally the obligation of SEGCO under an installment sale agreement for the purchase of certain pollution control facilities at SEGCO's generating units, pursuant to which $25 million principal amount of pollution control revenue bonds are outstanding and mature in June 2019. Alabama Power also guaranteed a $100 million principal amount long-term bank loan entered into by SEGCO on November 28, 2018. Georgia Power has agreed to reimburse Alabama Power for the portion of such obligations corresponding to Georgia Power's proportionate ownership of SEGCO's stock if Alabama Power is called upon to make such payment under its guarantee. At December 31, 2018, the capitalization of SEGCO consisted of $90 million of equity and $125 million of long-term debt, on which the annual interest requirement is $4 million. In addition, SEGCO had short-term debt outstanding of $5 million. See Note 7 under "SEGCO" for additional information.
In 2013, Georgia Power entered into an agreement that requires Georgia Power to guarantee certain payments of a gas supplier for Plant McIntosh for a period up to 15 years. The agreement was subsequently amended on May 31, 2018. The guarantee is expected to be terminated if certain events occur by October 2019. In the event the gas supplier defaults on payments, the maximum potential exposure under the guarantee and amendment is approximately $30 million.
In October 2017, Atlantic Coast Pipeline executed a $3.4 billion revolving credit facility with a stated maturity date of October 2021. Southern Company Gas entered into a guarantee agreement to support its share of the revolving credit facility. Southern Company Gas' maximum exposure to loss under the terms of the guarantee is limited to 5% of the outstanding borrowings under the credit facility, and totaled $72 million as of December 31, 2018. See Note 2 under "FERC Matters – Southern Company Gas" for additional information regarding the Atlantic Coast Pipeline.
As discussed above under "Operating Leases," Alabama Power and Georgia Power have entered into certain residual value guarantees related to railcar leases.
10. INCOME TAXES
Southern Company files a consolidated federal income tax return and the registrants file various state income tax returns, some of which are combined or unitary. Under a joint consolidated income tax allocation agreement, each Southern Company subsidiary's current and deferred tax expense is computed on a stand-alone basis and no subsidiary is allocated more current expense than would be paid if it filed a separate income tax return. PowerSecure and Southern Company Gas became participants in the income

COMBINED NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)
Southern Company and Subsidiary Companies 2018 Annual Report

tax allocation agreement as of May 9, 2016 and July 1, 2016, respectively. See Note 15 for additional information on these acquisitions, as well as disposition activity during 2018. In accordance with IRS regulations, each company is jointly and severally liable for the federal tax liability. Prior to the Merger, Southern Company Gas filed a U.S. federal consolidated income tax return and various state income tax returns.
Federal Tax Reform Legislation
Following the enactment of the Tax Reform Legislation, the SEC staff issued Staff Accounting Bulletin 118 – "Income Tax Accounting Implications of the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act" (SAB 118), which provided for a measurement period of up to one year from the enactment date to complete accounting under GAAP for the tax effects of the legislation. Due to the complex and comprehensive nature of the enacted tax law changes and their application under GAAP, the registrants considered all amounts recorded in the financial statements as a result of the Tax Reform Legislation "provisional" as discussed in SAB 118 and subject to revision prior to filing the 2017 tax return in the fourth quarter 2018. As of December 31, 2018, each of the registrants considered the measurement of impacts from the Tax Reform Legislation on deferred income tax assets and liabilities, primarily due to the impact of the reduction of the corporate income tax rate, to be complete.
However, the IRS continues to issue regulations that provide further interpretation and guidance on the law and each respective state's adoption of the provisions contained in the Tax Reform Legislation remains uncertain. In addition, the regulatory treatment of certain impacts of the Tax Reform Legislation is subject to the discretion of the FERC and each state regulatory commission. The ultimate impact of these matters cannot be determined at this time. See Note 2 for additional information.
Current and Deferred Income Taxes
Details of income tax provisions are as follows:
 2018
      
 Southern CompanyAlabama Power
Georgia
Power
Mississippi PowerSouthern Power
 (in millions)
Federal —     
Current$167
$91
$393
$(567)$85
Deferred231
123
(249)575
(154)
 398
214
144
8
(69)
State —  
  
Current188
26
81
(10)(9)
Deferred(137)51
(11)(100)(86)
 51
77
70
(110)(95)
Total$449
$291
$214
$(102)$(164)

COMBINED NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)
Southern Company and Subsidiary Companies 2018 Annual Report

 2017
      
 Southern CompanyAlabama Power
Georgia
Power
Mississippi PowerSouthern Power
 (in millions)
Federal —     
Current$(62)$136
$256
$194
$(566)
Deferred(6)336
504
(753)(312)
 (68)472
760
(559)(878)
State —     
Current37
23
116

(110)
Deferred173
73
(46)27
49
 210
96
70
27
(61)
Total$142
$568
$830
$(532)$(939)
 2016
 Southern CompanyAlabama Power
Georgia
Power
Mississippi PowerSouthern Power
 (in millions)
Federal —     
Current$1,184
$103
$391
$(31)$928
Deferred(342)339
319
(60)(1,098)
 842
442
710
(91)(170)
State —     
Current(108)20
6
(6)(60)
Deferred217
69
64
(7)35
 109
89
70
(13)(25)
Total$951
$531
$780
$(104)$(195)
 Southern Company Gas
 Successor  Predecessor
 Year Ended December 31, 2018Year Ended December 31, 2017
July 1, 2016
through
December 31, 2016
  
January 1, 2016
through
June 30, 2016
 (in millions)  (in millions)
Federal —      
Current$334
$103
$
  $67
Deferred33
170
65
  8
 367
273
65
  75
State —      
Current131
27
(16)  12
Deferred(34)67
27
  
 97
94
11
  12
Total$464
$367
$76
  $87
Southern Company's and Southern Power's ITCs and PTCs generated in the current tax year and carried forward from prior tax years that cannot be utilized in the current tax year are reclassified from current to deferred taxes in federal income tax expense in the tables above. Southern Power's ITCs and PTCs reclassified in this manner include $128 million for 2018, $316 million for

COMBINED NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)
Southern Company and Subsidiary Companies 2018 Annual Report

2017, and $1.13 billion for 2016. These ITCs and PTCs for Southern Company and Southern Power are included in "Deferred Tax Assets and Liabilities" herein.
In accordance with regulatory requirements, federal ITCs for the traditional electric operating companies and the natural gas distribution utilities, as well as certain state ITCs for Nicor Gas, are deferred, and, upon utilization, amortized over the average life of the related property with such amortization normally applied as a credit to reduce depreciation in the statements of income. Southern Power's deferred federal ITCs are amortized to income tax expense over the life of the respective asset. ITCs amortized in 2018, 2017, and 2016 were immaterial for Alabama Power, Georgia Power, Mississippi Power, and Southern Company Gas and were as follows for Southern Company and Southern Power:
 Southern CompanySouthern Power
 (in millions)
2018$87
$58
201779
57
201659
37
Southern Power received $5 million of cash related to federal ITCs under renewable energy initiatives in 2018. No cash was received in 2017 or 2016. Southern Power recognized tax credits and reduced the tax basis of the asset by 50% of the ITCs received, resulting in a net deferred tax asset. Southern Power has elected to recognize the tax benefit of this basis difference as a reduction to income tax expense in the year in which the plant reaches commercial operation. The tax benefit of the related basis differences reduced income tax expense by $1 million in 2018, $18 million in 2017, and $173 million in 2016. See "Unrecognized Tax Benefits" herein for further information.
State ITCs and other state credits, which are recognized in the period in which the credits are generated, reduced Georgia Power's income tax expense by $21 million in 2018, $37 million in 2017, and $31 million in 2016 and reduced Southern Power's income tax expense by $32 million in 2017 and $7 million in 2016.
Southern Power's federal and state PTCs, which are recognized in the period in which the credits are generated, reduced Southern Power's income tax expense by $141 million in 2018, $139 million in 2017, and $50 million in 2016.
Legal Entity Reorganizations
In April 2018, Southern Power completed the final stage of a legal entity reorganization of various direct and indirect subsidiaries that own and operate substantially all of its solar facilities, including certain subsidiaries owned in partnership with various third parties. In September 2018, Southern Power also completed a legal entity reorganization of eight operating wind facilities under a new holding company, SP Wind. The reorganizations resulted in net state tax benefits related to certain changes in apportionment rates totaling approximately $65 million, which were recorded in 2018.
Effective Tax Rate
Southern Company's effective tax rate is typically lower than the statutory rate due to employee stock plans' dividend deduction, non-taxable AFUDC equity at the traditional electric operating companies, flowback of excess deferred income taxes at the regulated utilities, and federal income tax benefits from ITCs and PTCs primarily at Southern Power. Each registrant's effective tax rate for 2018 varied significantly as compared to 2017 due to the 14% lower 2018 federal tax rate resulting from the Tax Reform Legislation.

COMBINED NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)
Southern Company and Subsidiary Companies 2018 Annual Report

A reconciliation of the federal statutory income tax rate to the effective income tax rate is as follows:
 2018
 Southern CompanyAlabama Power
Georgia
Power
Mississippi PowerSouthern Power
Federal statutory rate21.0 %21.0 %21.0 %21.0 %21.0 %
State income tax, net of federal deduction1.8
5.0
5.5
(65.1)(90.8)
Employee stock plans' dividend deduction(1.0)



Non-deductible book depreciation0.8
0.6
1.2
0.7

Flowback of excess deferred income taxes(4.0)(1.8)
(4.1)
AFUDC-Equity(1.0)(1.0)(1.4)

ITC basis difference(0.6)


(0.2)
Federal PTCs(4.7)


(156.6)
Amortization of ITC(2.0)(0.1)(0.2)(0.2)(55.4)
Tax impact from sale of subsidiaries8.6




Tax Reform Legislation(1.4)
(4.9)(26.3)96.1
Noncontrolling interests(0.4)


(14.9)
Other(0.8)(0.1)0.1
(1.4)2.0
Effective income tax (benefit) rate16.3 %23.6 %21.3 %(75.4)%(198.8)%
 2017
 Southern CompanyAlabama Power
Georgia
Power
Mississippi Power(*)
Southern Power
Federal statutory rate35.0 %35.0 %35.0 %(35.0)%35.0 %
State income tax, net of federal deduction12.5
4.5
2.0
0.6
(22.2)
Employee stock plans' dividend deduction(4.0)



Non-deductible book depreciation3.1
0.9
0.7
0.1

Flowback of excess deferred income taxes(0.3)
(0.1)

AFUDC-Equity(2.6)(1.0)(0.6)

AFUDC-Equity portion of Kemper IGCC charge15.7


5.3

ITC basis difference(1.7)


(10.0)
Federal PTCs(12.1)


(72.5)
Amortization of ITC(4.2)(0.2)(0.1)
(20.6)
Tax Reform Legislation(25.6)0.3
(0.4)11.9
(416.1)
Noncontrolling interests(1.4)


(8.6)
Other(1.1)0.1
0.2

(10.7)
Effective income tax (benefit) rate13.3 %39.6 %36.7 %(17.1)%(525.7)%
(*)Represents effective income tax benefit rate for Mississippi Power due to a loss before income taxes in 2017.

COMBINED NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)
Southern Company and Subsidiary Companies 2018 Annual Report

 2016
 Southern CompanyAlabama Power
Georgia
Power
Mississippi Power(*)
Southern Power
Federal statutory rate35.0 %35.0 %35.0 %(35.0)%35.0 %
State income tax, net of federal deduction2.0
4.2
2.1
(5.7)(9.1)
Employee stock plans' dividend deduction(1.2)



Non-deductible book depreciation0.9
1.0
0.8
0.7

Flowback of excess deferred income taxes(0.1)
(0.1)(0.3)
AFUDC-Equity(2.0)(0.7)(0.8)(28.5)
ITC basis difference(5.0)


(96.3)
Federal PTCs(1.2)


(23.3)
Amortization of ITC(0.9)(0.2)(0.2)(0.1)(13.4)
Noncontrolling interests(0.3)


(6.2)
Other0.1
(0.5)(0.1)0.4
4.7
Effective income tax (benefit) rate27.3 %38.8 %36.7 %(68.5)%(108.6)%
(*)Represents effective income tax benefit rate for Mississippi Power due to a loss before income taxes in 2016.
 Southern Company Gas
 Successor  Predecessor
 Year Ended December 31, 2018Year Ended December 31, 2017
July 1, 2016
through
December 31, 2016
  
January 1, 2016
through
June 30, 2016
Federal statutory rate21.0%35.0%35.0%  35.0%
State income tax, net of federal deduction9.210.03.6  3.5
Flowback of excess deferred income taxes(3.0)(0.2)  
Amortization of ITC(0.1)(0.2)(0.4)  
Tax impact on sale of subsidiaries28.5  
Tax Reform Legislation(0.4)15.0  
Other0.30.61.8  (0.9)
Effective income tax rate55.5%60.2%40.0%  37.6%

COMBINED NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)
Southern Company and Subsidiary Companies 2018 Annual Report

Deferred Tax Assets and Liabilities
The tax effects of temporary differences between the carrying amounts of assets and liabilities in the financial statements of the registrants and their respective tax bases, which give rise to deferred tax assets and liabilities, are as follows:
 December 31, 2018
 Southern CompanyAlabama PowerGeorgia
Power
Mississippi PowerSouthern PowerSouthern Company Gas
 (in millions)
Deferred tax liabilities —  
   
Accelerated depreciation$8,461
$2,236
$3,005
$335
$1,483
$1,176
Property basis differences1,807
865
633
162

134
Federal effect of net state deferred tax assets


36


Leveraged lease basis differences253





Employee benefit obligations477
149
290
25
6
6
Premium on reacquired debt88
14
74



Regulatory assets –      
Storm damage reserves111

111



Employee benefit obligations975
260
344
45

45
AROs1,232
276
925
31


AROs1,210
607
575



Other593
177
141
68
34
132
Total deferred income tax liabilities15,207
4,584
6,098
702
1,523
1,493
Deferred tax assets —      
Federal effect of net state deferred tax liabilities260
155
71

22
46
Employee benefit obligations1,273
286
444
62
7
150
Other property basis differences251

61

172

ITC and PTC carryforward2,730
11
430

2,128

Alternative minimum tax carryforward62


32
21

Other partnership basis difference162



162

Other comprehensive losses82
10
3



AROs2,442
883
1,500
31


Estimated loss on plants under construction346

283
63


Other deferred state tax attributes415

19
251
72

Regulatory liability associated with the Tax Reform Legislation (not subject to normalization)294
130
127
29

8
Other731
147
140
47
47
285
Total deferred income tax assets9,048
1,622
3,078
515
2,631
489
Valuation allowance(123)
(42)(41)(27)(12)
Net deferred income tax assets8,925
1,622
3,036
474
2,604
477
Net deferred income taxes (assets)/liabilities$6,282
$2,962
$3,062
$228
$(1,081)$1,016
   

   
Recognized in the balance sheets:  

   
Accumulated deferred income
taxes – assets
$(276)$
$
$(150)$(1,186)$
Accumulated deferred income
taxes – liabilities
$6,558
$2,962
$3,062
$378
$105
$1,016

COMBINED NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)
Southern Company and Subsidiary Companies 2018 Annual Report

 December 31, 2017
 Southern CompanyAlabama PowerGeorgia
Power
Mississippi PowerSouthern PowerSouthern Company Gas
 (in millions)
Deferred tax liabilities —      
Accelerated depreciation$9,059
$2,135
$2,889
$303
$1,922
$1,150
Property basis differences1,853
725
606
207
2
204
Federal effect of net state deferred tax assets


9


Leveraged lease basis differences251





Employee benefit obligations527
162
287
28
7
4
Premium on reacquired debt54
16
34



Regulatory assets –      
Storm damage reserves89

89



Employee benefit obligations1,044
260
349
46

75
AROs821
249
501
33


AROs370
220
130



Other689
147
140
73
30
208
Total deferred income tax liabilities14,757
3,914
5,025
699
1,961
1,641
Deferred tax assets —      
Federal effect of net state deferred tax liabilities330
143
85

42
54
Employee benefit obligations1,339
286
448
62
8
185
Other property basis differences343

59

184

ITC and PTC carryforward2,414
9
403

2,002

Federal NOL carryforward518


40
333
92
Alternative minimum tax carryforward69


32
21

Other partnership basis difference23



23

Other comprehensive losses84
10
4

1

AROs1,191
469
631
33


Estimated loss on plants under construction722


722


Other deferred state tax attributes330

6
133
77

Regulatory liability associated with the Tax Reform Legislation (not subject to normalization)304
126
123
27

9
Other538
111
91
54
9
223
Total deferred income tax assets8,205
1,154
1,850
1,103
2,700
563
Valuation allowance(184)

(157)(13)(11)
Net deferred income tax assets8,021
1,154
1,850
946
2,687
552
Net deferred income taxes (assets)/liabilities$6,736
$2,760
$3,175
$(247)$(726)$1,089
       
Recognized in the balance sheets:      
Accumulated deferred income
taxes – assets
$(106)$
$
$(247)$(925)$
Accumulated deferred income
taxes – liabilities
$6,842
$2,760
$3,175
$
$199
$1,089
The implementation of the Tax Reform Legislation significantly reduced accumulated deferred income taxes in 2017, partially offset by bonus depreciation provisions in the PATH Act.
The traditional electric operating companies and natural gas distribution utilities have tax-related regulatory assets (deferred income tax charges) and regulatory liabilities (deferred income tax credits). The regulatory assets are primarily attributable to tax benefits flowed through to customers in prior years, deferred taxes previously recognized at rates lower than the current enacted

COMBINED NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)
Southern Company and Subsidiary Companies 2018 Annual Report

tax law, and taxes applicable to capitalized interest. The regulatory liabilities are primarily attributable to deferred taxes previously recognized at rates higher than the current enacted tax law and to unamortized ITCs. See Note 2 for each registrant's related balances at December 31, 2018 and 2017.
Tax Credit Carryforwards
Federal ITC/PTC carryforwards at December 31, 2018 were as follows:
 Southern Company
Alabama
Power
Georgia
Power
Southern
Power
 (in millions)
Federal ITC/PTC carryforwards$2,410
$11
$108
$2,128
Year in which federal ITC/PTC carryforwards begin expiring2032
2033
2032
2034
Year by which federal ITC/PTC carryforwards are expected to be utilized2022
2021
2021
2022
The estimated tax credit utilization reflects the 2018 abandonment loss related to certain Kemper County energy facility expenditures as well as the projected taxable gains on the various sale transactions described in Note 15 and "Legal Entity Reorganizations" herein. The expected utilization of tax credit carryforwards could be further delayed by numerous factors, including the acquisition of additional renewable projects, the purchase of rights to additional PTCs of Plant Vogtle Units 3 and 4 pursuant to the MEAG Funding Agreement or the Global Amendments, and changes in taxable income projections. See Note 2 under "Georgia PowerNuclear Construction" for additional information on Plant Vogtle Units 3 and 4.
At December 31, 2018, Georgia Power also had approximately $341 million in state investment and other state tax credit carryforwards for the State of Georgia that will expire between 2020 and 2028 and are not expected to be fully utilized. Georgia Power has a net state valuation allowance of $33 million associated with these carryforwards.
The ultimate outcome of these matters cannot be determined at this time.

COMBINED NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)
Southern Company and Subsidiary Companies 2018 Annual Report

Net Operating Loss Carryforwards
In the 2018 tax year, Southern Company expects to fully utilize the carryforward from federal NOLs generated in 2016 and 2017.
At December 31, 2018, the state and local NOL carryforwards for Southern Company's subsidiaries were as follows:
Company/JurisdictionApproximate NOL CarryforwardsApproximate Net State Income Tax Benefit
Tax Year NOL
Begins Expiring
 (in millions) 
Mississippi Power   
Mississippi$5,062
$200
2031
    
Southern Power   
Oklahoma846
40
2035
Florida264
11
2033
South Carolina62
2
2034
Other states42
3
2029
Southern Power Total$1,214
$56
 
    
Other(*)
   
Georgia358
16
2019
New York223
11
2036
New York City208
15
2036
Other states278
14
Various
Southern Company Total$7,343
$312

(*)Represents other Southern Company subsidiaries. Alabama Power, Georgia Power, and Southern Company Gas did not have state NOL carryforwards at December 31, 2018.
State NOLs for Mississippi, Oklahoma, and Florida are not expected to be fully utilized prior to expiration. At December 31, 2018, Mississippi Power had a net state valuation allowance of $32 million for the Mississippi NOL and Southern Power had a net state valuation allowance of $9 million for the Oklahoma NOL and $11 million for the Florida NOL.
The ultimate outcome of these matters cannot be determined at this time.

COMBINED NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)
Southern Company and Subsidiary Companies 2018 Annual Report

Unrecognized Tax Benefits
Unrecognized tax benefits changes in 2018, 2017, and 2016 for Southern Company, Mississippi Power, and Southern Power are provided below. The remaining registrants did not have any material unrecognized tax benefits for the periods presented.
 Southern CompanyMississippi PowerSouthern Power
 (in millions)
Unrecognized tax benefits at December 31, 2015$433
$421
$8
Tax positions changes –   
Increase from current periods45
26
17
Increase from prior periods21
18

Decrease from prior periods(15)
(8)
Unrecognized tax benefits at December 31, 2016484
465
17
Tax positions changes –   
Increase from current periods10


Increase from prior periods10
2

Decrease from prior periods(196)(177)(17)
Reductions due to settlements(290)(290)
Unrecognized tax benefits at December 31, 201718


Tax positions changes –   
Decrease from prior periods(18)

Unrecognized tax benefits at December 31, 2018$
$
$
Mississippi Power's tax positions increase from current and prior periods for 2017 and 2016 relate to state tax benefits, deductions for R&E expenditures, and charitable contribution carryforwards that were impacted as a result of the settlement of R&E expenditures associated with the Kemper County energy facility, as well as federal income tax benefits from deferred ITCs. Mississippi Power's tax positions decrease from prior periods and the reductions due to settlements for 2017 relate primarily to the settlement of R&E expenditures associated with the Kemper County energy facility. See Note 2 under "Mississippi PowerKemper County Energy Facility" and "Section 174 Research and Experimental Deduction" herein for more information.
Southern Power's increase in unrecognized tax benefits from current periods for 2016, and the decrease from prior periods for 2017 and 2016, primarily relate to federal income tax benefits from deferred ITCs.
There were no unrecognized tax benefits at December 31, 2018. The impact on the effective tax rate of Southern Company, Mississippi Power, and Southern Power, if recognized, was as follows for 2017 and 2016:
 Southern CompanyMississippi PowerSouthern Power
 (in millions)
2017   
Tax positions impacting the effective tax rate$18
$
$
Tax positions not impacting the effective tax rate


Balance of unrecognized tax benefits$18
$
$
    
2016   
Tax positions impacting the effective tax rate$20
$1
$17
Tax positions not impacting the effective tax rate464
464

Balance of unrecognized tax benefits$484
$465
$17
Mississippi Power's tax positions not impacting the effective tax rate for 2016 relate to deductions for R&E expenditures associated with the Kemper County energy facility. See "Section 174 Research and Experimental Deduction" herein for more information. These amounts are presented on a gross basis without considering the related federal or state income tax impact.

COMBINED NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)
Southern Company and Subsidiary Companies 2018 Annual Report

Southern Power's impact on the effective tax rate was determined based on the amount of ITCs, which were uncertain.
All of the registrants classify interest on tax uncertainties as interest expense. Accrued interest for all tax positions other than the Section 174 R&E deductions was immaterial for all years presented. None of the registrants accrued any penalties on uncertain tax positions.
It is reasonably possible that the amount of the unrecognized tax benefits could change within 12 months. New audit findings or settlements associated with ongoing audits could result in significant unrecognized tax benefits. At this time, a range of reasonably possible outcomes cannot be determined.
The IRS has finalized its audits of Southern Company's consolidated federal income tax returns through 2017, as well as the pre-Merger Southern Company Gas tax returns. Southern Company is a participant in the Compliance Assurance Process of the IRS. The audits for the registrants' state income tax returns have either been concluded, or the statute of limitations has expired, for years prior to 2012.
Section 174 Research and Experimental Deduction
Southern Company, on behalf of Mississippi Power, has reflected deductions for R&E expenditures related to the Kemper County energy facility in its federal income tax calculations since 2013 and filed amended federal income tax returns for 2008 through 2013 to also include such deductions. In September 2017, the U.S. Congress Joint Committee on Taxation approved a settlement between Southern Company and the IRS, resolving a methodology for these deductions. As a result of this approval, Mississippi Power recognized $176 million in 2017 of previously unrecognized tax benefits and reversed $36 million of associated accrued interest.
11. RETIREMENT BENEFITS
Effective in December 2017, 538 employees transferred from SCS to the Company. Accordingly, theThe Southern Company assumed various compensation and benefit plans includingsystem has a qualified defined benefit, trusteed, pension plan covering substantially all employees.employees, with the exception of employees at PowerSecure. The qualified defined benefit pension plan is funded in accordance with requirements of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974, as amended (ERISA). No contributions to the qualified pension plan were made for the year ended December 31, 2018 and no mandatory contributions to the qualified pension plan are anticipated for the year ending December 31, 2019. The Southern Company system also provides certain non-qualified defined benefits for a select group of management and highly compensated employees, which are funded on a cash basis. In addition, the Southern Company system provides certain medical care and life insurance benefits for retired employees through other postretirement benefit plans. The traditional electric operating companies fund other postretirement trusts to the extent required by their respective regulatory commissions. Southern Company Gas has a separate unfunded supplemental retirement health care plan that provides medical care and life insurance benefits to employees of discontinued businesses. For the year ending December 31, 2019, no other postretirement trust contributions are expected.
On January 1, 2018, the qualified defined benefit pension plan of Southern Company Gas was merged into the Southern Company system's qualified defined benefit pension plan and the pension plan was reopened to all non-union employees of Southern Company Gas. Prior to January 1, 2018, Southern Company Gas had a separate qualified defined benefit, trusteed, pension plan covering certain eligible employees, which was closed in 2012 to new employees. Also on January 1, 2018, Southern Company Gas' non-qualified retirement plans were merged into the Southern Company system's non-qualified retirement plan (defined benefit and defined contribution).
Effective in December 2017, 538 employees transferred from SCS to Southern Power. Accordingly, Southern Power assumed various compensation and benefit plans including participation in the Southern Company system's qualified defined benefit, trusteed, pension plan covering substantially all employees. With the transfer of employees, the CompanySouthern Power assumed the related benefit obligations from SCS of $139 million for the qualified pension plan (along with trust assets of $138 million) and $11 million for other postretirement benefit plans, together with $36 million in prior service costs and net gains/losses that are in OCI. In 2018, the Company willSouthern Power also beginbegan providing certain defined benefits under athe non-qualified pension plan for a select group of management and highly compensated employees. No obligation related to these benefits was assumed in the employee transfer; however, obligations under the non-qualified pension plan for future services rendered by employees will befollowing the transfer are being recognized beginning in 2018by Southern Power and ultimatelyare funded on a cash basis. In addition, the CompanySouthern Power provides certain medical care and life insurance benefits for retired employees through other postretirement benefit plans that are to be funded on a cash basis.
Prior to the transfer of employees in December 2017, substantially all expenses charged by SCS, including pension and other postretirement benefit costs, were recorded in Southern Power's other operations and maintenance expense. BeginningThe disclosures included herein exclude Southern Power for periods prior to the transfer of employees in 2018, in connection withDecember 2017.
On January 1, 2019, Southern Company completed the adoptionsale of ASU 2017-07,Gulf Power to NextEra Energy. See Note 15 under "Southern Company's Sale of Gulf Power" for additional information. The portion of the service cost component ofSouthern Company system's pension and postretirement benefit costs will be recorded in other operations and maintenance expense while the non-service cost components of pension and postretirement benefit costs will be recorded in other income (expense). See Note 1 under "General" for additional information.
    Table of Contents                                Index to Financial Statements

COMBINED NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)
Southern Power Company and Subsidiary Companies 20172018 Annual Report

postretirement benefit plans attributable to Gulf Power that is reflected in Southern Company's consolidated balance sheet as held for sale at December 31, 2018 consists of:
 
Pension
Plans
Other Postretirement Benefit Plans
 (in millions)
Projected benefit obligation$526
$69
Plan assets492
17
Accrued liability$(34)$(52)
All amounts presented in the remainder of this note reflect the benefit plan obligations and related plan assets for the Southern Company system's pension and other postretirement benefit plans, including the amounts attributable to Gulf Power.
Actuarial AssumptionsCurrent and Deferred Income Taxes
The weighted average rates assumed in the actuarial calculations used to determine the benefit obligations for the pension and other postretirement plans asDetails of the December 31, 2017 measurement dateincome tax provisions are presented below.
Assumptions used to determine benefit obligations:2017
Pension plans
Discount rate3.94%
Annual salary increase4.46
Other postretirement benefit plans
Discount rate3.81%
Annual salary increase4.46
In determining the amount of pension cost to be recognized in 2018, the Company estimates the expected rate of return on pension plan assets using a financial model to project the expected return on the current investment portfolio. The analysis projects an expected rate of return on each of the different asset classes in order to arrive at the expected return on the entire portfolio relying on the trust's target asset allocation and reasonable capital market assumptions. The financial model is based on four key inputs: anticipated returns by asset class (based in part on historical returns), the trust's target asset allocation, an anticipated inflation rate, and the projected impact of a periodic rebalancing of the trust's portfolio.
An additional assumption used in measuring the accumulated other postretirement benefit obligations (APBO) is a weighted average medical care cost trend rate. The weighted average medical care cost trend rates used in measuring the APBO as of December 31, 2017 were as follows:
 Initial Cost Trend Rate Ultimate Cost Trend Rate Year That Ultimate Rate is Reached
Pre-656.50% 4.50% 2026
Post-65 medical5.00
 4.50
 2026
Post-65 prescription10.00
 4.50
 2026
An annual increase or decrease in the assumed medical care cost trend rate of 1% would have an immaterial effect on the APBO at December 31, 2017.
Pension Plan
The total accumulated benefit obligation for the pension plan was $111 million at December 31, 2017. The projected benefit obligation for the pension plan was $139 million and the fair value of plan assets was $138 million at December 31, 2017.
Presented below are the amounts included in AOCI at December 31, 2017 related to the Company's pension plan that had not yet been recognized in net periodic pension cost, along with the estimated amortization of such amounts for 2018.
 2017 Estimated Amortization in 2018
 (in millions)
Prior service cost$1
 $
Net (gain) loss32
 2
AOCI$33
  
 2018
      
 Southern CompanyAlabama Power
Georgia
Power
Mississippi PowerSouthern Power
 (in millions)
Federal —     
Current$167
$91
$393
$(567)$85
Deferred231
123
(249)575
(154)
 398
214
144
8
(69)
State —  
  
Current188
26
81
(10)(9)
Deferred(137)51
(11)(100)(86)
 51
77
70
(110)(95)
Total$449
$291
$214
$(102)$(164)
    Table of Contents                                Index to Financial Statements

COMBINED NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)
Southern Power Company and Subsidiary Companies 20172018 Annual Report

Future benefit payments reflect expected future service and are estimated based on assumptions used to measure the projected benefit obligation for the pension plan. At December 31, 2017, estimated benefit payments average approximately $4 million each year for the next five years, and for the five-year period from 2023 to 2027 estimated benefit payments are $27 million.
Other Postretirement Benefits
The APBO for the other postretirement benefit plan at December 31, 2017 is $11 million. Amounts recognized in the balance sheet at December 31, 2017 related to the Company's other postretirement benefit plan consist of the following:
 2017
 (in millions)
Employee benefit obligations (included in other deferred credits and liabilities)$(11)
AOCI3
Presented below are the amounts included in AOCI at December 31, 2017 related to the other postretirement benefit plans that had not yet been recognized in net periodic other postretirement benefit cost along with the estimated amortization of such amounts for 2018.
 2017 
Estimated
Amortization
in 2018
 (in millions)
Net (gain) loss$3
 $
AOCI$3
  
Future benefit payments, which include any prescription drug benefits, and any offset from drug subsidiary receipts, are immaterial for each of the years 2018-2027.
Benefit Plan Assets
Pension plan assets are managed and invested in accordance with all applicable requirements, including ERISA and the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended. The Company's investment policies for the pension plan cover a diversified mix of assets, including equity and fixed income securities, real estate, and private equity. Derivative instruments are used primarily to gain efficient exposure to the various asset classes and as hedging tools. The Company minimizes the risk of large losses primarily through diversification but also monitors and manages other aspects of risk.
The composition of the Company's pension plan assets as of December 31, 2017, along with the targeted mix of assets for the plan, is presented below:
 2017
      
 Southern CompanyAlabama Power
Georgia
Power
Mississippi PowerSouthern Power
 (in millions)
Federal —     
Current$(62)$136
$256
$194
$(566)
Deferred(6)336
504
(753)(312)
 (68)472
760
(559)(878)
State —     
Current37
23
116

(110)
Deferred173
73
(46)27
49
 210
96
70
27
(61)
Total$142
$568
$830
$(532)$(939)
 Target 2017
Pension plan assets:   
Domestic equity26% 31%
International equity25
 25
Fixed income23
 24
Special situations3
 1
Real estate investments14
 13
Private equity9
 6
Total100% 100%
 2016
 Southern CompanyAlabama Power
Georgia
Power
Mississippi PowerSouthern Power
 (in millions)
Federal —     
Current$1,184
$103
$391
$(31)$928
Deferred(342)339
319
(60)(1,098)
 842
442
710
(91)(170)
State —     
Current(108)20
6
(6)(60)
Deferred217
69
64
(7)35
 109
89
70
(13)(25)
Total$951
$531
$780
$(104)$(195)
The investment strategy for plan assets related to the
 Southern Company Gas
 Successor  Predecessor
 Year Ended December 31, 2018Year Ended December 31, 2017
July 1, 2016
through
December 31, 2016
  
January 1, 2016
through
June 30, 2016
 (in millions)  (in millions)
Federal —      
Current$334
$103
$
  $67
Deferred33
170
65
  8
 367
273
65
  75
State —      
Current131
27
(16)  12
Deferred(34)67
27
  
 97
94
11
  12
Total$464
$367
$76
  $87
Southern Company's qualified pension plan is to be broadly diversified across major asset classes. The asset allocation is established after consideration of various factors that affect the assets and liabilities of the pension plan including, but not limited to, historicalSouthern Power's ITCs and expected returns and interest rates, volatility, correlations of asset classes,PTCs generated in the current level of assetstax year and liabilities,carried forward from prior tax years that cannot be utilized in the current tax year are reclassified from current to deferred taxes in federal income tax expense in the tables above. Southern Power's ITCs and the assumed growthPTCs reclassified in assets and liabilities. Because a significant portion of the liability of the pension plan is long-term in nature, the assets are invested consistent with long-term investment expectationsthis manner include $128 million for return and risk. To manage the actual asset class exposures relative to the target asset allocation, the Company employs a formal rebalancing program. As additional risk management, external investment managers and service providers are subject to written2018, $316 million for
    Table of Contents                                Index to Financial Statements

COMBINED NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)
Southern Power Company and Subsidiary Companies 20172018 Annual Report

guidelines to ensure appropriate2017, and prudent investment practices. Management believes the portfolio is well-diversified$1.13 billion for 2016. These ITCs and PTCs for Southern Company and Southern Power are included in "Deferred Tax Assets and Liabilities" herein.
In accordance with no significant concentrations of risk.
Investment Strategies
Detailed below is a description of the investment strategies for each major asset categoryregulatory requirements, federal ITCs for the pension benefit plan disclosed above:
Domestic equity. A mix of largetraditional electric operating companies and small capitalization stocks with generally an equalthe natural gas distribution of value and growth attributes, managed both actively and through passive index approaches.
International equity. A mix of growth stocks and value stocks with both developed and emerging market exposure, managed both actively and through passive index approaches.
Fixed income. A mix of domestic and international bonds.
Special situations. Investments in opportunistic strategies with the objective of diversifying and enhancing returns and exploiting short-term inefficienciesutilities, as well as investmentscertain state ITCs for Nicor Gas, are deferred, and, upon utilization, amortized over the average life of the related property with such amortization normally applied as a credit to reduce depreciation in promising new strategiesthe statements of income. Southern Power's deferred federal ITCs are amortized to income tax expense over the life of the respective asset. ITCs amortized in 2018, 2017, and 2016 were immaterial for Alabama Power, Georgia Power, Mississippi Power, and Southern Company Gas and were as follows for Southern Company and Southern Power:
 Southern CompanySouthern Power
 (in millions)
2018$87
$58
201779
57
201659
37
Southern Power received $5 million of cash related to federal ITCs under renewable energy initiatives in 2018. No cash was received in 2017 or 2016. Southern Power recognized tax credits and reduced the tax basis of the asset by 50% of the ITCs received, resulting in a net deferred tax asset. Southern Power has elected to recognize the tax benefit of this basis difference as a reduction to income tax expense in the year in which the plant reaches commercial operation. The tax benefit of the related basis differences reduced income tax expense by $1 million in 2018, $18 million in 2017, and $173 million in 2016. See "Unrecognized Tax Benefits" herein for further information.
State ITCs and other state credits, which are recognized in the period in which the credits are generated, reduced Georgia Power's income tax expense by $21 million in 2018, $37 million in 2017, and $31 million in 2016 and reduced Southern Power's income tax expense by $32 million in 2017 and $7 million in 2016.
Southern Power's federal and state PTCs, which are recognized in the period in which the credits are generated, reduced Southern Power's income tax expense by $141 million in 2018, $139 million in 2017, and $50 million in 2016.
Legal Entity Reorganizations
In April 2018, Southern Power completed the final stage of a longer-term nature.
legal entity reorganization of various direct and indirect subsidiaries that own and operate substantially all of its solar facilities, including certain subsidiaries owned in partnership with various third parties. In September 2018, Southern Power also completed a legal entity reorganization of eight operating wind facilities under a new holding company, SP Wind. The reorganizations resulted in net state tax benefits related to certain changes in apportionment rates totaling approximately $65 million, which were recorded in 2018.
Effective Tax Rate
Real estate investments. Investments inSouthern Company's effective tax rate is typically lower than the statutory rate due to employee stock plans' dividend deduction, non-taxable AFUDC equity at the traditional private market, equity-oriented investments in real properties (indirectly through pooled funds or partnerships)electric operating companies, flowback of excess deferred income taxes at the regulated utilities, and in publicly traded real estate securities.
Private equity. Investments in private partnerships that invest in private or public securities typically through privately-negotiated and/or structured transactions, including leveraged buyouts, venture capital,federal income tax benefits from ITCs and distressed debt.
Benefit Plan Asset Fair Values
Following are the fair value measurementsPTCs primarily at Southern Power. Each registrant's effective tax rate for the pension plan assets2018 varied significantly as of December 31, 2017. The fair values presented are prepared in accordance with GAAP. For purposes of determining the fair value of the pension plan assets and the appropriate level designation, management relies on information provided by the plan's trustee. This information is reviewed and evaluated by management with changes madecompared to 2017 due to the trustee information as appropriate.
Valuation methods of14% lower 2018 federal tax rate resulting from the primary fair value measurements disclosed in the following tables are as follows:
Domestic and international equity.Investments in equity securities such as common stocks, American depositary receipts, and real estate investment trusts that trade on a public exchange are classified as Level 1 investments and are valued at the closing price in the active market. Equity investments with unpublished prices (i.e. pooled funds) are valued as Level 2, when the underlying holdings used to value the investment are comprised of Level 1 or Level 2 equity securities.
Fixed income.Investments in fixed income securities are generally classified as Level 2 investments and are valued based on prices reported in the market place. Additionally, the value of fixed income securities takes into consideration certain items such as broker quotes, spreads, yield curves, interest rates, and discount rates that apply to the term of a specific instrument.
Real estate investments, private equity, and special situations investments.Investments in real estate, private equity, and special situations are generally classified as Net Asset Value as a Practical Expedient, since the underlying assets typically do not have publicly available observable inputs. The fund manager values the assets using various inputs and techniques depending on the nature of the underlying investments. Techniques may include purchase multiples for comparable transactions, comparable public company trading multiples, discounted cash flow analysis, prevailing market capitalization rates, recent sales of comparable investments, and independent third-party appraisals. The fair value of partnerships is determined by aggregating the value of the underlying assets less liabilities.
Tax Reform Legislation.
    Table of Contents                                Index to Financial Statements

COMBINED NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)
Southern Power Company and Subsidiary Companies 20172018 Annual Report

The fair valuesA reconciliation of pension plan assetsthe federal statutory income tax rate to the effective income tax rate is as of December 31, 2017 are presented below. These fair value measurements exclude cash, receivables related to investment income, pending investments sales, and payables related to pending investment purchases.follows:
 Fair Value Measurements Using  
 Quoted Prices in Active Markets for Identical Assets Significant Other Observable Inputs Significant Unobservable Inputs Net Asset Value as a Practical Expedient  
As of December 31, 2017:(Level 1) (Level 2) (Level 3) (NAV) Total
 (in millions)
Assets:         
Domestic equity(*)
$28
 $13
 $
 $
 $41
International equity(*)
18
 16
 
 
 34
Fixed income:         
U.S. Treasury, government, and agency bonds
 10
 
 
 10
Corporate bonds
 14
 
 
 14
Pooled funds
 8
 
 
 8
Cash equivalents and other2
 
 
 
 2
Real estate investments5
 
 
 14
 19
Special situations
 
 
 2
 2
Private equity
 
 
 8
 8
Total$53
 $61
 $
 $24
 $138
 2018
 Southern CompanyAlabama Power
Georgia
Power
Mississippi PowerSouthern Power
Federal statutory rate21.0 %21.0 %21.0 %21.0 %21.0 %
State income tax, net of federal deduction1.8
5.0
5.5
(65.1)(90.8)
Employee stock plans' dividend deduction(1.0)



Non-deductible book depreciation0.8
0.6
1.2
0.7

Flowback of excess deferred income taxes(4.0)(1.8)
(4.1)
AFUDC-Equity(1.0)(1.0)(1.4)

ITC basis difference(0.6)


(0.2)
Federal PTCs(4.7)


(156.6)
Amortization of ITC(2.0)(0.1)(0.2)(0.2)(55.4)
Tax impact from sale of subsidiaries8.6




Tax Reform Legislation(1.4)
(4.9)(26.3)96.1
Noncontrolling interests(0.4)


(14.9)
Other(0.8)(0.1)0.1
(1.4)2.0
Effective income tax (benefit) rate16.3 %23.6 %21.3 %(75.4)%(198.8)%
 2017
 Southern CompanyAlabama Power
Georgia
Power
Mississippi Power(*)
Southern Power
Federal statutory rate35.0 %35.0 %35.0 %(35.0)%35.0 %
State income tax, net of federal deduction12.5
4.5
2.0
0.6
(22.2)
Employee stock plans' dividend deduction(4.0)



Non-deductible book depreciation3.1
0.9
0.7
0.1

Flowback of excess deferred income taxes(0.3)
(0.1)

AFUDC-Equity(2.6)(1.0)(0.6)

AFUDC-Equity portion of Kemper IGCC charge15.7


5.3

ITC basis difference(1.7)


(10.0)
Federal PTCs(12.1)


(72.5)
Amortization of ITC(4.2)(0.2)(0.1)
(20.6)
Tax Reform Legislation(25.6)0.3
(0.4)11.9
(416.1)
Noncontrolling interests(1.4)


(8.6)
Other(1.1)0.1
0.2

(10.7)
Effective income tax (benefit) rate13.3 %39.6 %36.7 %(17.1)%(525.7)%
(*)Level 1 securities consist of actively traded stocks while Level 2 securities consist of pooled funds.Represents effective income tax benefit rate for Mississippi Power due to a loss before income taxes in 2017.
3. CONTINGENCIES AND REGULATORY MATTERS
General Litigation MattersCOMBINED NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)
The Company is subject to certain claims and legal actions arising in the ordinary course of business. In addition, the Company's business activities are subject to extensive governmental regulation related to public health and the environment. Litigation over environmental issues and claims of various types, including property damage, personal injury, common law nuisance, and citizen enforcement of environmental requirements such as standards for air, water, land, and protection of other natural resources, has occurred throughout the U.S. This litigation has included claims for damages alleged to have been caused by CO2 and other emissions and alleged exposure to hazardous materials, and/or requests for injunctive relief in connection with such matters. The ultimate outcome of such pending or potential litigation against theSouthern Company and its subsidiaries cannot be predicted at this time; however, for current proceedings not specifically reported herein, management does not anticipate that the ultimate liabilities, if any, arising from such current proceedings would have a material effect on the Company's financial statements.Subsidiary Companies 2018 Annual Report
During 2015, the Company indirectly acquired a 51% membership interest in RE Roserock LLC (Roserock), the owner of the Roserock facility in Pecos County, Texas, which was under construction by Recurrent Energy, LLC and was subsequently placed in service in November 2016. Prior to placing the facility in service, certain solar panels were damaged during installation. While the facility currently is generating energy consistent with operational expectations and PPA obligations, the Company is pursuing remedies under its insurance policies and other contracts to repair or replace these solar panels. In connection therewith, the Company is withholding payments of approximately $26 million from the construction contractor, who has placed a lien on the Roserock facility for the same amount. The amounts withheld are included in other accounts payable and other current liabilities on the Company's consolidated balance sheets. On May 18, 2017, Roserock filed a lawsuit in the state district court in Pecos County, Texas, against XL Insurance America, Inc. (XL) and North American Elite Insurance Company (North American Elite) seeking recovery from an insurance policy for damages resulting from a hail storm and certain installation practices by the construction contractor, McCarthy Building Companies, Inc. (McCarthy). On May 19, 2017, Roserock filed a separate lawsuit against McCarthy in the state district court in Travis County, Texas alleging breach of contract and breach of warranty for the damages sustained at the Roserock facility, which has since been moved to the U.S. District Court for the Western District of Texas. On May 22, 2017, McCarthy filed a counter lawsuit against Roserock, Array Technologies, Inc., Canadian Solar (USA), Inc., XL, and North American Elite in the U.S. District Court for the Western District of Texas alleging, among other things,
 2016
 Southern CompanyAlabama Power
Georgia
Power
Mississippi Power(*)
Southern Power
Federal statutory rate35.0 %35.0 %35.0 %(35.0)%35.0 %
State income tax, net of federal deduction2.0
4.2
2.1
(5.7)(9.1)
Employee stock plans' dividend deduction(1.2)



Non-deductible book depreciation0.9
1.0
0.8
0.7

Flowback of excess deferred income taxes(0.1)
(0.1)(0.3)
AFUDC-Equity(2.0)(0.7)(0.8)(28.5)
ITC basis difference(5.0)


(96.3)
Federal PTCs(1.2)


(23.3)
Amortization of ITC(0.9)(0.2)(0.2)(0.1)(13.4)
Noncontrolling interests(0.3)


(6.2)
Other0.1
(0.5)(0.1)0.4
4.7
Effective income tax (benefit) rate27.3 %38.8 %36.7 %(68.5)%(108.6)%
(*)Represents effective income tax benefit rate for Mississippi Power due to a loss before income taxes in 2016.
 Southern Company Gas
 Successor  Predecessor
 Year Ended December 31, 2018Year Ended December 31, 2017
July 1, 2016
through
December 31, 2016
  
January 1, 2016
through
June 30, 2016
Federal statutory rate21.0%35.0%35.0%  35.0%
State income tax, net of federal deduction9.210.03.6  3.5
Flowback of excess deferred income taxes(3.0)(0.2)  
Amortization of ITC(0.1)(0.2)(0.4)  
Tax impact on sale of subsidiaries28.5  
Tax Reform Legislation(0.4)15.0  
Other0.30.61.8  (0.9)
Effective income tax rate55.5%60.2%40.0%  37.6%
    Table of Contents                                Index to Financial Statements

COMBINED NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)
Southern Power Company and Subsidiary Companies 20172018 Annual Report

breach of contract,Deferred Tax Assets and requesting foreclosure of mechanic's liens against Roserock. On July 18, 2017, the U.S. District Court for the Western District of Texas consolidated the two pending lawsuits. On December 11, 2017, the U.S. District Court for the Western District of Texas dismissed McCarthy's claims against Canadian Solar (USA), Inc. and dismissed cross-claims that XL and North American Elite had sought to bring against Roserock. The Company intends to vigorously pursue and defend these matters, the ultimate outcome of which cannot be determined at this time.
FERC MattersLiabilities
The tax effects of temporary differences between the carrying amounts of assets and liabilities in the financial statements of the registrants and their respective tax bases, which give rise to deferred tax assets and liabilities, are as follows:
 December 31, 2018
 Southern CompanyAlabama PowerGeorgia
Power
Mississippi PowerSouthern PowerSouthern Company Gas
 (in millions)
Deferred tax liabilities —  
   
Accelerated depreciation$8,461
$2,236
$3,005
$335
$1,483
$1,176
Property basis differences1,807
865
633
162

134
Federal effect of net state deferred tax assets


36


Leveraged lease basis differences253





Employee benefit obligations477
149
290
25
6
6
Premium on reacquired debt88
14
74



Regulatory assets –      
Storm damage reserves111

111



Employee benefit obligations975
260
344
45

45
AROs1,232
276
925
31


AROs1,210
607
575



Other593
177
141
68
34
132
Total deferred income tax liabilities15,207
4,584
6,098
702
1,523
1,493
Deferred tax assets —      
Federal effect of net state deferred tax liabilities260
155
71

22
46
Employee benefit obligations1,273
286
444
62
7
150
Other property basis differences251

61

172

ITC and PTC carryforward2,730
11
430

2,128

Alternative minimum tax carryforward62


32
21

Other partnership basis difference162



162

Other comprehensive losses82
10
3



AROs2,442
883
1,500
31


Estimated loss on plants under construction346

283
63


Other deferred state tax attributes415

19
251
72

Regulatory liability associated with the Tax Reform Legislation (not subject to normalization)294
130
127
29

8
Other731
147
140
47
47
285
Total deferred income tax assets9,048
1,622
3,078
515
2,631
489
Valuation allowance(123)
(42)(41)(27)(12)
Net deferred income tax assets8,925
1,622
3,036
474
2,604
477
Net deferred income taxes (assets)/liabilities$6,282
$2,962
$3,062
$228
$(1,081)$1,016
   

   
Recognized in the balance sheets:  

   
Accumulated deferred income
taxes – assets
$(276)$
$
$(150)$(1,186)$
Accumulated deferred income
taxes – liabilities
$6,558
$2,962
$3,062
$378
$105
$1,016

COMBINED NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)
Southern Company and certainSubsidiary Companies 2018 Annual Report

 December 31, 2017
 Southern CompanyAlabama PowerGeorgia
Power
Mississippi PowerSouthern PowerSouthern Company Gas
 (in millions)
Deferred tax liabilities —      
Accelerated depreciation$9,059
$2,135
$2,889
$303
$1,922
$1,150
Property basis differences1,853
725
606
207
2
204
Federal effect of net state deferred tax assets


9


Leveraged lease basis differences251





Employee benefit obligations527
162
287
28
7
4
Premium on reacquired debt54
16
34



Regulatory assets –      
Storm damage reserves89

89



Employee benefit obligations1,044
260
349
46

75
AROs821
249
501
33


AROs370
220
130



Other689
147
140
73
30
208
Total deferred income tax liabilities14,757
3,914
5,025
699
1,961
1,641
Deferred tax assets —      
Federal effect of net state deferred tax liabilities330
143
85

42
54
Employee benefit obligations1,339
286
448
62
8
185
Other property basis differences343

59

184

ITC and PTC carryforward2,414
9
403

2,002

Federal NOL carryforward518


40
333
92
Alternative minimum tax carryforward69


32
21

Other partnership basis difference23



23

Other comprehensive losses84
10
4

1

AROs1,191
469
631
33


Estimated loss on plants under construction722


722


Other deferred state tax attributes330

6
133
77

Regulatory liability associated with the Tax Reform Legislation (not subject to normalization)304
126
123
27

9
Other538
111
91
54
9
223
Total deferred income tax assets8,205
1,154
1,850
1,103
2,700
563
Valuation allowance(184)

(157)(13)(11)
Net deferred income tax assets8,021
1,154
1,850
946
2,687
552
Net deferred income taxes (assets)/liabilities$6,736
$2,760
$3,175
$(247)$(726)$1,089
       
Recognized in the balance sheets:      
Accumulated deferred income
taxes – assets
$(106)$
$
$(247)$(925)$
Accumulated deferred income
taxes – liabilities
$6,842
$2,760
$3,175
$
$199
$1,089
The implementation of its generation subsidiaries are subject to regulationthe Tax Reform Legislation significantly reduced accumulated deferred income taxes in 2017, partially offset by bonus depreciation provisions in the FERC. The Company has authority from the FERC to sell electricity at market-based rates. Since 2008, that authority, for certain balancing authority areas, has been conditioned on compliance with the requirements of an energy auction, which the FERC found to be tailored mitigation that addresses potential market power concerns. In accordance with FERC regulations governing such authority, the traditional electric operating companies and the Company filed a triennial market power analysis in 2014, which included continued reliance on the energy auction as tailored mitigation. In 2015, the FERC issued an order finding that the traditional electric operating companies' and the Company's existing tailored mitigation may not effectively mitigate the potential to exert market power in certain areas served by the traditional electric operating companies and in some adjacent areas. The FERC directed the traditional electric operating companies and the Company to show why market-based rate authority should not be revoked in these areas or to provide a mitigation plan to further address market power concerns. PATH Act.
The traditional electric operating companies and natural gas distribution utilities have tax-related regulatory assets (deferred income tax charges) and regulatory liabilities (deferred income tax credits). The regulatory assets are primarily attributable to tax benefits flowed through to customers in prior years, deferred taxes previously recognized at rates lower than the current enacted

COMBINED NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)
Southern Company filed a requestand Subsidiary Companies 2018 Annual Report

tax law, and taxes applicable to capitalized interest. The regulatory liabilities are primarily attributable to deferred taxes previously recognized at rates higher than the current enacted tax law and to unamortized ITCs. See Note 2 for rehearingeach registrant's related balances at December 31, 2018 and filed their response with2017.
Tax Credit Carryforwards
Federal ITC/PTC carryforwards at December 31, 2018 were as follows:
 Southern Company
Alabama
Power
Georgia
Power
Southern
Power
 (in millions)
Federal ITC/PTC carryforwards$2,410
$11
$108
$2,128
Year in which federal ITC/PTC carryforwards begin expiring2032
2033
2032
2034
Year by which federal ITC/PTC carryforwards are expected to be utilized2022
2021
2021
2022
The estimated tax credit utilization reflects the FERC in 2015.
In December 2016, the traditional electric operating companies and the Company filed an amendment2018 abandonment loss related to their market-based rate tariff that proposed certain changes to theKemper County energy auction,facility expenditures as well as several non-tariff changes. On Februarythe projected taxable gains on the various sale transactions described in Note 15 and "Legal Entity Reorganizations" herein. The expected utilization of tax credit carryforwards could be further delayed by numerous factors, including the acquisition of additional renewable projects, the purchase of rights to additional PTCs of Plant Vogtle Units 3 and 4 pursuant to the MEAG Funding Agreement or the Global Amendments, and changes in taxable income projections. See Note 2 2017, the FERC issued an order accepting all such changes subject to anunder "Georgia PowerNuclear Construction" for additional condition of cost-based price caps for certain sales outside of the energy auction, finding that all of these changes would provide adequate alternative mitigationinformation on Plant Vogtle Units 3 and 4.
At December 31, 2018, Georgia Power also had approximately $341 million in state investment and other state tax credit carryforwards for the traditional electric operating companies'State of Georgia that will expire between 2020 and the Company's potential2028 and are not expected to exert market power in certain areas served by the traditional electric operating companies and in some adjacent areas. On May 17, 2017, the FERC accepted the traditional electric operating companies' and the Company's compliance filing accepting the termsbe fully utilized. Georgia Power has a net state valuation allowance of the order. While the FERC's February 2, 2017 order references the market power proceeding discussed above, it remains a separate, ongoing matter.
On October 25, 2017, the FERC issued an order in response to the traditional electric operating companies' and the Company's June 29, 2017 triennial updated market power analysis. The FERC directed the traditional electric operating companies and the Company to show cause within 60 days why market-based rate authority should not be revoked in certain areas adjacent to the area presently under mitigation in accordance$33 million associated with the February 2, 2017 order or to provide a mitigation plan to further address market power concerns. On November 10, 2017, the traditional electric operating companies and the Company responded to the FERC and proposed to resolve matters by applying the alternative mitigation authorized by the February 2, 2017 order to the adjacent areas made the subject of the October 25, 2017 order.these carryforwards.
The ultimate outcome of these matters cannot be determined at this time.
4. JOINT OWNERSHIP AGREEMENTS
COMBINED NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)
Southern Company and Subsidiary Companies 2018 Annual Report

Net Operating Loss Carryforwards
In the 2018 tax year, Southern Company expects to fully utilize the carryforward from federal NOLs generated in 2016 and 2017.
At December 31, 2018, the state and local NOL carryforwards for Southern Company's subsidiaries were as follows:
Company/JurisdictionApproximate NOL CarryforwardsApproximate Net State Income Tax Benefit
Tax Year NOL
Begins Expiring
 (in millions) 
Mississippi Power   
Mississippi$5,062
$200
2031
    
Southern Power   
Oklahoma846
40
2035
Florida264
11
2033
South Carolina62
2
2034
Other states42
3
2029
Southern Power Total$1,214
$56
 
    
Other(*)
   
Georgia358
16
2019
New York223
11
2036
New York City208
15
2036
Other states278
14
Various
Southern Company Total$7,343
$312

(*)Represents other Southern Company subsidiaries. Alabama Power, Georgia Power, and Southern Company Gas did not have state NOL carryforwards at December 31, 2018.
State NOLs for Mississippi, Oklahoma, and Florida are not expected to be fully utilized prior to expiration. At December 31, 2018, Mississippi Power had a net state valuation allowance of $32 million for the Mississippi NOL and Southern Power had a net state valuation allowance of $9 million for the Oklahoma NOL and $11 million for the Florida NOL.
The Company is a 65% ownerultimate outcome of Plant Stanton A, a natural gas-fired combined-cycle unit with a nameplate capacity of 659 MWs. The unit is co-owned by the Orlando Utilities Commission (28%), the Florida Municipal Power Agency (3.5%), and the Kissimmee Utility Authority (3.5%). The Company has a service agreement with SCS whereby SCS is responsible for the operation and maintenance of Plant Stanton A. As of December 31, 2017, $155 million was recorded in plant in service with associated accumulated depreciation of $55 million. These amounts represent the Company's share of total plant assets and each owner is responsible for providing its own financing. The Company's proportionate share of Plant Stanton A's operating expense is included in the corresponding operating expenses in the consolidated statements of income.
5. INCOME TAXES
On behalf of the Company, Southern Company files a consolidated federal income tax return and various state income tax returns, some of which are combined, unitary, or consolidated. Under a joint consolidated income tax allocation agreement, each Southern Company subsidiary's current and deferred tax expense is computed on a stand-alone basis and no subsidiary is allocated more current expense than wouldthese matters cannot be paid if it filed a separate income tax return. In accordance with IRS regulations, each company is jointly and severally liable for the federal tax liability.determined at this time.
    Table of Contents                                Index to Financial Statements

COMBINED NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)
Southern Power Company and Subsidiary Companies 20172018 Annual Report

FederalUnrecognized Tax Reform LegislationBenefits
Following the enactment of the Tax Reform Legislation, the SEC staff issued Staff Accounting Bulletin 118 – "Income Tax Accounting Implications of the Tax CutsUnrecognized tax benefits changes in 2018, 2017, and Jobs Act" (SAB 118), which provides2016 for a measurement period of up to one year from the enactment date to complete accounting under GAAPSouthern Company, Mississippi Power, and Southern Power are provided below. The remaining registrants did not have any material unrecognized tax benefits for the periods presented.
 Southern CompanyMississippi PowerSouthern Power
 (in millions)
Unrecognized tax benefits at December 31, 2015$433
$421
$8
Tax positions changes –   
Increase from current periods45
26
17
Increase from prior periods21
18

Decrease from prior periods(15)
(8)
Unrecognized tax benefits at December 31, 2016484
465
17
Tax positions changes –   
Increase from current periods10


Increase from prior periods10
2

Decrease from prior periods(196)(177)(17)
Reductions due to settlements(290)(290)
Unrecognized tax benefits at December 31, 201718


Tax positions changes –   
Decrease from prior periods(18)

Unrecognized tax benefits at December 31, 2018$
$
$
Mississippi Power's tax effects of the legislation. Duepositions increase from current and prior periods for 2017 and 2016 relate to the complexstate tax benefits, deductions for R&E expenditures, and comprehensive nature of the enacted tax law changes, and their application under GAAP, Southern Company considers all amounts recorded in the financial statementscharitable contribution carryforwards that were impacted as a result of the Tax Reform Legislationsettlement of R&E expenditures associated with the Kemper County energy facility, as well as federal income tax benefits from deferred ITCs. Mississippi Power's tax positions decrease from prior periods and the reductions due to settlements for 2017 relate primarily to the settlement of R&E expenditures associated with the Kemper County energy facility. See Note 2 under "Mississippi PowerKemper County Energy Facility" and "Section 174 Research and Experimental Deduction" herein for more information.
Southern Power's increase in unrecognized tax benefits from current periods for 2016, and the decrease from prior periods for 2017 and 2016, primarily relate to federal income tax benefits from deferred ITCs.
There were no unrecognized tax benefits at December 31, 2018. The impact on the effective tax rate of Southern Company, Mississippi Power, and Southern Power, if recognized, was as follows for 2017 and 2016:
 Southern CompanyMississippi PowerSouthern Power
 (in millions)
2017   
Tax positions impacting the effective tax rate$18
$
$
Tax positions not impacting the effective tax rate


Balance of unrecognized tax benefits$18
$
$
    
2016   
Tax positions impacting the effective tax rate$20
$1
$17
Tax positions not impacting the effective tax rate464
464

Balance of unrecognized tax benefits$484
$465
$17
Mississippi Power's tax positions not impacting the effective tax rate for 2016 relate to deductions for R&E expenditures associated with the Kemper County energy facility. See "Section 174 Research and Experimental Deduction" herein for more information. These amounts are presented on a gross basis without considering the related federal or state income tax impact.

COMBINED NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)
Southern Company and Subsidiary Companies 2018 Annual Report

Southern Power's impact on the effective tax rate was determined based on the amount of ITCs, which were uncertain.
All of the registrants classify interest on tax uncertainties as interest expense. Accrued interest for all tax positions other than the Section 174 R&E deductions was immaterial for all years presented. None of the registrants accrued any penalties on uncertain tax positions.
It is reasonably possible that the amount of the unrecognized tax benefits could change within 12 months. New audit findings or settlements associated with ongoing audits could result in significant unrecognized tax benefits. At this time, a range of reasonably possible outcomes cannot be "provisional"determined.
The IRS has finalized its audits of Southern Company's consolidated federal income tax returns through 2017, as discussed in SAB 118 and subject to revision. Thewell as the pre-Merger Southern Company Gas tax returns. Southern Company is awaiting additional guidance from industry anda participant in the Compliance Assurance Process of the IRS. The audits for the registrants' state income tax authoritiesreturns have either been concluded, or the statute of limitations has expired, for years prior to 2012.
Section 174 Research and Experimental Deduction
Southern Company, on behalf of Mississippi Power, has reflected deductions for R&E expenditures related to the Kemper County energy facility in orderits federal income tax calculations since 2013 and filed amended federal income tax returns for 2008 through 2013 to finalize its accounting. also include such deductions. In September 2017, the U.S. Congress Joint Committee on Taxation approved a settlement between Southern Company and the IRS, resolving a methodology for these deductions. As a result of this approval, Mississippi Power recognized $176 million in 2017 of previously unrecognized tax benefits and reversed $36 million of associated accrued interest.
11. RETIREMENT BENEFITS
The ultimate impactSouthern Company system has a qualified defined benefit, trusteed, pension plan covering substantially all employees, with the exception of employees at PowerSecure. The qualified defined benefit pension plan is funded in accordance with requirements of the Tax Reform LegislationEmployee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974, as amended (ERISA). No contributions to the qualified pension plan were made for the year ended December 31, 2018 and no mandatory contributions to the qualified pension plan are anticipated for the year ending December 31, 2019. The Southern Company system also provides certain non-qualified defined benefits for a select group of management and highly compensated employees, which are funded on deferred income taxa cash basis. In addition, the Southern Company system provides certain medical care and life insurance benefits for retired employees through other postretirement benefit plans. The traditional electric operating companies fund other postretirement trusts to the extent required by their respective regulatory commissions. Southern Company Gas has a separate unfunded supplemental retirement health care plan that provides medical care and life insurance benefits to employees of discontinued businesses. For the year ending December 31, 2019, no other postretirement trust contributions are expected.
On January 1, 2018, the qualified defined benefit pension plan of Southern Company Gas was merged into the Southern Company system's qualified defined benefit pension plan and the pension plan was reopened to all non-union employees of Southern Company Gas. Prior to January 1, 2018, Southern Company Gas had a separate qualified defined benefit, trusteed, pension plan covering certain eligible employees, which was closed in 2012 to new employees. Also on January 1, 2018, Southern Company Gas' non-qualified retirement plans were merged into the Southern Company system's non-qualified retirement plan (defined benefit and defined contribution).
Effective in December 2017, 538 employees transferred from SCS to Southern Power. Accordingly, Southern Power assumed various compensation and benefit plans including participation in the Southern Company system's qualified defined benefit, trusteed, pension plan covering substantially all employees. With the transfer of employees, Southern Power assumed the related benefit obligations from SCS of $139 million for the qualified pension plan (along with trust assets of $138 million) and liabilities cannot be determined$11 million for other postretirement benefit plans, together with $36 million in prior service costs and net gains/losses in OCI. In 2018, Southern Power also began providing certain defined benefits under the non-qualified pension plan for a select group of management and highly compensated employees. No obligation related to these benefits was assumed in the employee transfer; however, obligations for services rendered by employees following the transfer are being recognized by Southern Power and are funded on a cash basis. In addition, Southern Power provides certain medical care and life insurance benefits for retired employees through other postretirement benefit plans that are funded on a cash basis. Prior to the transfer of employees in December 2017, substantially all expenses charged by SCS, including pension and other postretirement benefit costs, were recorded in Southern Power's other operations and maintenance expense. The disclosures included herein exclude Southern Power for periods prior to the transfer of employees in December 2017.
On January 1, 2019, Southern Company completed the sale of Gulf Power to NextEra Energy. See Note 15 under "Southern Company's Sale of Gulf Power" for additional information. The portion of the Southern Company system's pension and other

COMBINED NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)
Southern Company and Subsidiary Companies 2018 Annual Report

postretirement benefit plans attributable to Gulf Power that is reflected in Southern Company's consolidated balance sheet as held for sale at December 31, 2018 consists of:
 
Pension
Plans
Other Postretirement Benefit Plans
 (in millions)
Projected benefit obligation$526
$69
Plan assets492
17
Accrued liability$(34)$(52)
All amounts presented in the remainder of this time.note reflect the benefit plan obligations and related plan assets for the Southern Company system's pension and other postretirement benefit plans, including the amounts attributable to Gulf Power.
CurrentRedeemable Noncontrolling Interests
In April 2017, Southern Power reclassified approximately $114 million from redeemable noncontrolling interests to non-redeemable noncontrolling interests due to the expiration of an option allowing SunPower Corporation to require Southern Power to purchase its redeemable noncontrolling interest at fair market value. In addition, in October 2017, Turner Renewable Energy, LLC redeemed at fair value its 10% interest of redeemable noncontrolling interest in certain of Southern Power's solar facilities. At December 31, 2018 and Deferred Income Taxes2017, there were no outstanding redeemable noncontrolling interests.
DetailsThe following table presents the changes in Southern Power's redeemable noncontrolling interests for the years ended December 31, 2017 and 2016:
 2017 2016
 (in millions)
Beginning balance$164
 $43
Net income attributable to redeemable noncontrolling interests2
 4
Distributions to redeemable noncontrolling interests(2) (1)
Capital contributions from redeemable noncontrolling interests2
 118
Redemption of redeemable noncontrolling interests(59) 
Reclassification to non-redeemable noncontrolling interests(114) 
Change in fair value of redeemable noncontrolling interests7
 
Ending balance$
 $164
The following table presents the attribution of net income tax provisionsto Southern Power and the noncontrolling interests for the years ended December 31, 2017 and 2016:
 2017 2016
 (in millions)
Net income$1,117
 $374
Less: Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests44
 32
Less: Net income attributable to redeemable noncontrolling interests2
 4
Net income attributable to Southern Power$1,071
 $338
Southern Company Gas
SouthStar, previously a joint venture owned 85% by Southern Company Gas and 15% by Piedmont, was the only VIE for which Southern Company Gas was the primary beneficiary, prior to October 2016 when Southern Company Gas completed its purchase of Piedmont's remaining interest in SouthStar.
In 2015, Georgia Natural Gas Company (GNG), a 100%-owned, direct subsidiary of Southern Company Gas, notified Piedmont of its election, pursuant to a change in control of SouthStar, to purchase Piedmont's 15% interest in SouthStar at fair market value. This purchase was contingent upon the closing of the merger between Piedmont and Duke Energy Corporation (Duke Energy). In October 2016, after Piedmont and Duke Energy completed their merger, GNG completed its purchase of Piedmont's interest in SouthStar and paid a purchase price of $160 million and $15 million for Piedmont's share of SouthStar's 2016 earnings through the date of acquisition.
Southern Company Gas' cash flows used for financing activities included SouthStar's distribution to Piedmont for its portion of SouthStar's annual earnings from the previous year. For the successor period of July 1, 2016 through December 31, 2016, SouthStar made a distribution of $15 million upon completion of the purchase of Piedmont's interest in SouthStar. For the predecessor period of January 1, 2016 through June 30, 2016, SouthStar distributed $19 million to Piedmont.

COMBINED NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)
Southern Company and Subsidiary Companies 2018 Annual Report

Equity Method Investments
The carrying amounts of Southern Company Gas' equity method investments at December 31, 2018 and 2017 and related income from those investments for the successor years ended December 31, 2018 and 2017, the successor period of July 1, 2016 through December 31, 2016, and the predecessor period of January 1, 2016 through June 30, 2016 were as follows:
Investment BalanceDecember 31, 2018 December 31, 2017
 (in millions)
SNG$1,261
 $1,262
PennEast Pipeline71
 57
Atlantic Coast Pipeline83
 41
Other123
 117
Total$1,538
 $1,477
 Successor Predecessor
Earnings from Equity Method InvestmentsYear ended December 31, 2018 Year ended December 31, 2017 July 1, 2016 through December 31, 2016  January 1, 2016 through June 30, 2016
 (in millions) (in millions)
SNG$131
 $88
 $56
  $
PennEast Pipeline5
 6
 
  
Atlantic Coast Pipeline7
 6
 1
  
Other5
 6
 3
  2
Total$148
 $106
 $60
  $2
SNG
In 2016, Southern Company Gas, through a wholly-owned, indirect subsidiary, acquired a 50% equity interest in SNG, which is accounted for as an equity method investment. See Note 15 under "Southern Company GasInvestment in SNG" for additional information. Selected financial information of SNG at December 31, 2018 and 2017 and for the years ended December 31, 2018 and 2017 and for the period September 1, 2016 through December 31, 2016 is as follows:
 At December 31,
Balance Sheet Information2018 2017
 (in millions)
Current assets$104
 $82
Property, plant, and equipment2,606
 2,439
Deferred charges and other assets121
 121
Total Assets$2,831
 $2,642
    
Current liabilities$103
 $110
Long-term debt1,103
 1,102
Other deferred charges and other liabilities212
 76
Total Liabilities$1,418
 $1,288
    
Total Stockholders' Equity$1,413
 $1,354
Total Liabilities and Stockholders' Equity$2,831
 $2,642

COMBINED NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)
Southern Company and Subsidiary Companies 2018 Annual Report

Income Statement Information
Year ended
December 31, 2018
 
Year ended
December 31, 2017
 September 1, 2016
through December 31, 2016
 (in millions)
Revenues$604
 $544
 $230
Operating income310
 242
 137
Net income261
 175
 115
Other Investments
Pipelines
In 2014, Southern Company Gas entered into a partnership in which it holds a 20% ownership interest in the PennEast Pipeline, an interstate pipeline company formed to develop and operate a 118-mile natural gas pipeline between New Jersey and Pennsylvania. The initial transportation capacity of 1.0 Bcf per day, is under long-term contracts, mainly with public utilities and other market-serving entities, such as electric generation companies, in New Jersey, Pennsylvania, and New York.
Also in 2014, Southern Company Gas entered into a project in which it holds a 5% ownership interest in the Atlantic Coast Pipeline, an interstate pipeline company formed to develop and operate a 594-mile natural gas pipeline in North Carolina, Virginia, and West Virginia with initial transportation capacity of 1.5 Bcf per day.
See Note 2 under "FERC Matters – Southern Company Gas" for additional information on these pipeline projects.
Pivotal JAX LNG, LLC
Southern Company Gas owns a 50% interest in a LNG liquefaction and storage facility in Jacksonville, Florida, which was placed in service in October 2018. This facility is outfitted with a 2.0 million gallon storage tank with the capacity to produce in excess of 120,000 gallons of LNG per day.

COMBINED NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)
Southern Company and Subsidiary Companies 2018 Annual Report

8. FINANCING
Securities Due Within One Year
A summary of long-term securities due within one year at each of December 31, 2018 and 2017 is as follows:
 December 31, 2018
 Southern CompanyAlabama PowerGeorgia
Power
Mississippi PowerSouthern PowerSouthern Company Gas
 (in millions)
Senior notes$2,950
$200
$500
$
$600
$300
Revenue bonds(a)
173

108
40


First mortgage bonds50




50
Capitalized leases24
1
13



Other(b)
1

(4)
(1)7
Total$3,198
$201
$617
$40
$599
$357
(a)For Southern Company and Mississippi Power, includes $40 million in pollution control revenue bonds classified as short term since they are variable rate demand obligations supported by short-term credit facilities; however, the final maturity dates range from 2020 to 2028.
(b)Represents unamortized debt related amounts, acquisition accounting fair value adjustments, and/or fair value hedges. See Note 14 for additional information regarding fair value hedges.
 December 31, 2017
 Southern CompanyGeorgia
Power
Mississippi PowerSouthern PowerSouthern Company Gas
 (in millions)
Senior notes$2,354
$750
$
$350
$155
Long-term bank term loans1,420
100
900
420

Revenue bonds(a)
90

90


Capitalized leases31
11



Other(b)
(3)(4)(1)
2
Total$3,892
$857
$989
$770
$157
(a)For Southern Company and Mississippi Power, includes $50 million in revenue bonds classified as short term at December 31, 2017 that were remarketed in an index rate mode subsequent to December 31, 2017. Also for Southern Company and Mississippi Power, includes $40 million in pollution control revenue bonds classified as short term since they are variable rate demand obligations supported by short-term credit facilities; however, the final maturity dates range from 2020 to 2028.
(b)Represents unamortized debt related amounts, acquisition accounting fair value adjustments, and fair value hedges. See Note 14 for additional information regarding fair value hedges.
Maturities of long-term debt for the next five years are as follows:
 2017 2016 2015
 (in millions)
Federal —     
Current (*)
$(566) $928
 $12
Deferred (*)
(312) (1,098) 10
 (878) (170) 22
State —     
Current(110) (60) (32)
Deferred49
 35
 31
 (61) (25) (1)
Total$(939) $(195) $21
 
Southern Company(a)
Alabama Power
Georgia
Power(a)
Mississippi Power
Southern Power(b)
Southern Company
Gas
 (in millions)
2019$3,156
$200
$621
$
$600
$350
20204,041
250
1,006
307
825

20213,186
310
375
270
300
330
20221,974
750
505

677
46
20232,388
300
153

290
400
(a)
Amounts include principal amortization related to the FFB borrowings beginning in 2020; however, the final maturity date is February 20, 2044. See "Long-term DebtDOE Loan Guarantee Borrowings" herein for additional information.
(b)Southern Power's 2022 maturity represents euro-denominated debt at the U.S. dollar denominated hedge settlement amount.

COMBINED NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)
Southern Company and Subsidiary Companies 2018 Annual Report

Long-term Debt
Senior Notes
Total senior notes (including amounts due within one year) outstanding at December 31, 2018 and 2017 were as follows:
 
Southern
Company
(a)
Alabama PowerGeorgia
Power
Mississippi PowerSouthern Power
Southern Company
 Gas(b)
 (in millions)
December 31, 2018$32,725
$6,875
$5,600
$1,200
$5,050
$4,000
December 31, 201735,148
6,375
7,100
755
5,459
4,157
(a)Includes $10.0 billion and $10.2 billion of senior notes at the Southern Company parent entity at December 31, 2018 and 2017, respectively.
(b)
Represents senior notes issued by Southern Company Gas Capital, which are fully and unconditionally guaranteed by Southern Company Gas. See "Structural Considerations" herein for additional information.
See Note 14 for information regarding fair value hedges of existing senior notes.
Except as otherwise described herein, Southern Company and its subsidiaries used the proceeds of 2018 senior note issuances for long-term debt redemptions and maturities, to repay short-term indebtedness, and for general corporate purposes, including working capital. The subsidiaries also used the proceeds for their construction programs.
In August 2018, Southern Company issued $750 million aggregate principal amount of Series 2018A Floating Rate Senior Notes due February 14, 2020 bearing interest based on three-month LIBOR.
Subsequent to December 31, 2018, through cash tender offers, Southern Company repurchased and retired approximately $522 million of the $1.0 billion aggregate principal amount outstanding of its 1.85% Senior Notes due July 1, 2019 (1.85% Notes), approximately $180 million of the $350 million aggregate principal amount outstanding of its Series 2014B 2.15% Senior Notes due September 1, 2019 (Series 2014B Notes), and approximately $504 million of the $750 million aggregate principal amount outstanding of its Series 2018A Floating Rate Notes due February 14, 2020 (Series 2018A Notes), for an aggregate purchase price, excluding accrued and unpaid interest, of approximately $1.2 billion. In addition, subsequent to December 31, 2018, and following the completion of the cash tender offers, Southern Company completed the redemption of all of the Series 2018A Notes remaining outstanding and called for redemption all of the 1.85% Notes and Series 2014B Notes remaining outstanding.
In June 2018, Alabama Power issued $500 million aggregate principal amount of Series 2018A 4.30% Senior Notes due July 15, 2048.
In April 2018, Georgia Power redeemed all $250 million aggregate principal amount of its Series 2008B 5.40% Senior Notes due June 1, 2018.
In May 2018, through cash tender offers, Georgia Power repurchased and retired $89 million of the $250 million aggregate principal amount outstanding of its Series 2007A 5.65% Senior Notes due March 1, 2037, $326 million of the $500 million aggregate principal amount outstanding of its Series 2009A 5.95% Senior Notes due February 1, 2039, and $335 million of the $600 million aggregate principal amount outstanding of its Series 2010B 5.40% Senior Notes due June 1, 2040, for an aggregate purchase price, excluding accrued and unpaid interest, of $902 million.
In March 2018, Mississippi Power issued $300 million aggregate principal amount of Series 2018A Floating Rate Senior Notes due March 27, 2020 bearing interest based on three-month LIBOR and $300 million aggregate principal amount of Series 2018B 3.95% Senior Notes due March 30, 2028.
In October 2018, Mississippi Power completed the redemption of all $30 million aggregate principal amount outstanding of its Series G 5.40% Senior Notes due July 1, 2035 and all $125 million aggregate principal amount outstanding of its Series 2009A 5.55% Senior Notes due March 1, 2019.

COMBINED NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)
Southern Company and Subsidiary Companies 2018 Annual Report

Junior Subordinated Notes
Total junior subordinated notes outstanding for Southern Company and Georgia Power at December 31, 2018 and 2017 were as follows:
 
Southern
Company
(*)
Georgia
Power
 (in millions)
December 31, 2018$3,570
$270
December 31, 20173,570
270
(*)ITCsIncludes $3.3 billion of junior subordinated notes at the Southern Company parent entity at both December 31, 2018 and PTCs generated2017.
Pollution Control Revenue Bonds
Pollution control revenue bond obligations represent loans to the traditional electric operating companies from public authorities of funds derived from sales by such authorities of revenue bonds issued to finance pollution control and solid waste disposal facilities. In some cases, the pollution control revenue bond obligations represent obligations under installment sales agreements with respect to facilities constructed with the proceeds of revenue bonds issued by public authorities. The traditional electric operating companies are required to make payments sufficient for the authorities to meet principal and interest requirements of such bonds. Proceeds from certain issuances are restricted until qualifying expenditures are incurred. Total tax-exempt pollution control revenue bond obligations (including amounts due within one year) outstanding at December 31, 2018 and 2017 were as follows:
 
Southern
Company
Alabama
Power
Georgia
Power
Mississippi Power
 (in millions)
December 31, 2018$2,585
$1,060
$1,460
$40
December 31, 20173,297
1,060
1,821
83
In October 2018, Alabama Power purchased and held $120 million aggregate principal amount of The Industrial Development Board of the City of Mobile, Alabama Pollution Control Revenue Bonds (Alabama Power Company Plant Barry Project), Series 2008. Alabama Power reoffered these bonds to the public in November 2018.
During 2018, Georgia Power purchased and held the following pollution control revenue bonds, which may be reoffered to the public at a later date:
approximately $105 million aggregate principal amount of Development Authority of Burke County (Georgia) Pollution Control Revenue Bonds (Georgia Power Company Plant Vogtle Project), First Series 2013
$173 million aggregate principal amount of Development Authority of Bartow County (Georgia) Pollution Control Revenue Bonds (Georgia Power Company Plant Bowen Project), First Series 2009
$55 million aggregate principal amount of Development Authority of Burke County (Georgia) Pollution Control Revenue Bonds (Georgia Power Company Plant Vogtle Project), Fifth Series 1994
$65 million aggregate principal amount of Development Authority of Burke County (Georgia) Pollution Control Revenue Bonds (Georgia Power Company Plant Vogtle Project), Second Series 2008
approximately $72 million aggregate principal amount of Development Authority of Bartow County (Georgia) Pollution Control Revenue Bonds (Georgia Power Company Plant Bowen Project), First Series 2013
In December 2018, the Development Authority of Burke County (Georgia) issued approximately $108 million aggregate principal amount of Pollution Control Revenue Bonds (Georgia Power Company Plant Vogtle Project), First Series 2018 due November 1, 2052 for the benefit of Georgia Power. The proceeds were used to redeem, in January 2019, approximately $13 million, $20 million, and $75 million aggregate principal amount of Development Authority of Burke County (Georgia) Pollution Control Revenue Bonds (Georgia Power Company Plant Vogtle Project), First Series 1992, Eighth Series 1994, and Second Series 1995, respectively.
In July 2018, Mississippi Power purchased and held approximately $43 million aggregate principal amount of Mississippi Business Finance Corporation Pollution Control Revenue Refunding Bonds, Series 2002. Mississippi Power may reoffer these bonds to the public at a later date.

COMBINED NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)
Southern Company and Subsidiary Companies 2018 Annual Report

Bank Term Loans
Total long-term bank term loans (including amounts due within one year) outstanding at December 31, 2018 and 2017 were as follows:
 
Southern
Company
Alabama PowerGeorgia
Power
Mississippi PowerSouthern Power
 (in millions)
December 31, 2018$145
$45
$
$
$
December 31, 20171,465
45
100
900
420
See "Notes Payable" herein for additional information regarding bank term loans.
In January 2018, Georgia Power repaid its outstanding $100 million floating rate bank loan due October 26, 2018.
In March 2018, Mississippi Power repaid at maturity a $900 million unsecured term loan.
In May 2018, Southern Power repaid $420 million aggregate principal amount of long-term floating rate bank loans.
In November 2018, SEGCO, as borrower, and Alabama Power, as guarantor, entered into a $100 million long-term delayed draw floating rate bank term loan bearing interest based on three-month LIBOR, which SEGCO used to repay at maturity $100 million aggregate principal amount of Series 2013A Senior Notes. See Note 9 under "Guarantees" for additional information.
DOE Loan Guarantee Borrowings
Pursuant to the loan guarantee program established under Title XVII of the Energy Policy Act of 2005 (Title XVII Loan Guarantee Program), Georgia Power and the DOE entered into the Loan Guarantee Agreement in 2014, under which the DOE agreed to guarantee the obligations of Georgia Power under a note purchase agreement (FFB Note Purchase Agreement) among the DOE, Georgia Power, and the FFB and a related promissory note (FFB Promissory Note). The FFB Note Purchase Agreement and the FFB Promissory Note provide for a multi-advance term loan facility (FFB Credit Facility), under which Georgia Power may make term loan borrowings through the FFB.
In July 2017, Georgia Power entered into an amendment to the Loan Guarantee Agreement (LGA Amendment) in connection with the DOE's consent to Georgia Power's entry into the Vogtle Services Agreement and the related intellectual property licenses (IP Licenses).
Under the terms of the Loan Guarantee Agreement, upon termination of the Vogtle 3 and 4 Agreement, further advances are conditioned upon the DOE's approval of any agreements entered into in replacement of the Vogtle 3 and 4 Agreement. Under the terms of the LGA Amendment, Georgia Power will not request any advances unless and until certain conditions are satisfied, including (i) receipt of the DOE's approval of the Bechtel Agreement (together with the Vogtle Services Agreement and the IP Licenses, the Replacement EPC Arrangements) and (ii) Georgia Power's entry into a further amendment to the Loan Guarantee Agreement with the DOE to reflect the Replacement EPC Arrangements.
Proceeds of advances made under the FFB Credit Facility are used to reimburse Georgia Power for Eligible Project Costs. Aggregate borrowings under the FFB Credit Facility may not exceed the lesser of (i) 70% of Eligible Project Costs or (ii) approximately $3.46 billion.
In September 2017, the DOE issued a conditional commitment to Georgia Power for up to approximately $1.67 billion of additional guaranteed loans under the Loan Guarantee Agreement. This conditional commitment expires on March 31, 2019, subject to any further extension approved by the DOE. Final approval and issuance of these additional loan guarantees by the DOE cannot be assured and are subject to the negotiation of definitive agreements, completion of due diligence by the DOE, receipt of any necessary regulatory approvals, and satisfaction of other conditions.
All borrowings under the FFB Credit Facility are full recourse to Georgia Power, and Georgia Power is obligated to reimburse the DOE for any payments the DOE is required to make to the FFB under the guarantee. Georgia Power's reimbursement obligations to the DOE are full recourse and secured by a first priority lien on (i) Georgia Power's 45.7% undivided ownership interest in Plant Vogtle Units 3 and 4 (primarily the units under construction, the related real property, and any nuclear fuel loaded in the reactor core) and (ii) Georgia Power's rights and obligations under the principal contracts relating to Plant Vogtle Units 3 and 4. There are no restrictions on Georgia Power's ability to grant liens on other property.
In addition to the conditions described above, future advances are subject to satisfaction of customary conditions, as well as certification of compliance with the requirements of the Title XVII Loan Guarantee Program, including accuracy of project-related representations and warranties, delivery of updated project-related information, and evidence of compliance with the

COMBINED NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)
Southern Company and Subsidiary Companies 2018 Annual Report

prevailing wage requirements of the Davis-Bacon Act of 1931, as amended, and certification from the DOE's consulting engineer that proceeds of the advances are used to reimburse Eligible Project Costs.
Upon satisfaction of all conditions described above, advances may be requested under the FFB Credit Facility on a quarterly basis through 2020. The final maturity date for each advance under the FFB Credit Facility is February 20, 2044. Interest is payable quarterly and principal payments will begin on February 20, 2020. Borrowings under the FFB Credit Facility will bear interest at the applicable U.S. Treasury rate plus a spread equal to 0.375%.
At both December 31, 2018 and 2017, Georgia Power had $2.6 billion of borrowings outstanding under the FFB Credit Facility.
Under the Loan Guarantee Agreement, Georgia Power is subject to customary borrower affirmative and negative covenants and events of default. In addition, Georgia Power is subject to project-related reporting requirements and other project-specific covenants and events of default.
In the event certain mandatory prepayment events (including any decision not to continue construction of Plant Vogtle Units 3 and 4) occur, the FFB's commitment to make further advances under the FFB Credit Facility will terminate and Georgia Power will be required to prepay the outstanding principal amount of all borrowings under the FFB Credit Facility over a period of five years (with level principal amortization). Among other things, these mandatory prepayment events include (i) the termination of the Vogtle Services Agreement or rejection of the Vogtle Services Agreement in bankruptcy if Georgia Power does not maintain access to intellectual property rights under the IP Licenses; (ii) a decision by Georgia Power not to continue construction of Plant Vogtle Units 3 and 4; (iii) cancellation of Plant Vogtle Units 3 and 4 by the Georgia PSC, or by Georgia Power if authorized by the Georgia PSC; and (iv) cost disallowances by the Georgia PSC that could have a material adverse effect on completion of Plant Vogtle Units 3 and 4 or Georgia Power's ability to repay the outstanding borrowings under the FFB Credit Facility. Under certain circumstances, insurance proceeds and any proceeds from an event of taking must be applied to immediately prepay outstanding borrowings under the FFB Credit Facility. In addition, if Georgia Power discontinues construction of Plant Vogtle Units 3 and 4, Georgia Power would be obligated to immediately repay a portion of the outstanding borrowings under the FFB Credit Facility to the extent such outstanding borrowings exceed 70% of Eligible Project Costs, net of the proceeds received by Georgia Power under the Guarantee Settlement Agreement. Georgia Power also may voluntarily prepay outstanding borrowings under the FFB Credit Facility. Under the FFB Credit Facility, any prepayment (whether mandatory or optional) will be made with a make-whole premium or discount, as applicable.
In connection with any cancellation of Plant Vogtle Units 3 and 4 that results in a mandatory prepayment event, the DOE may elect to continue construction of Plant Vogtle Units 3 and 4. In such an event, the DOE will have the right to assume Georgia Power's rights and obligations under the principal agreements relating to Plant Vogtle Units 3 and 4 and to acquire all or a portion of Georgia Power's ownership interest in Plant Vogtle Units 3 and 4.
Other Long-Term Debt
Alabama Power
Alabama Power has formed a wholly-owned trust subsidiary for the purpose of issuing preferred securities. The proceeds of the related equity investments and preferred security sales were loaned back to Alabama Power through the issuance of junior subordinated notes totaling $206 million outstanding at December 31, 2018 and 2017, which constitute substantially all of the assets of this trust and are reflected in the balance sheets as long-term debt payable. Alabama Power considers that the mechanisms and obligations relating to the preferred securities issued for its benefit, taken together, constitute a full and unconditional guarantee by it of the trust's payment obligations with respect to these securities. At December 31, 2018 and 2017, trust preferred securities of $200 million were outstanding. See Note 1 under "Variable Interest Entities" for additional information on the accounting treatment for this trust and the related securities.
Mississippi Power
At December 31, 2018 and 2017, Mississippi Power had $270 million aggregate principal amount outstanding of Mississippi Business Finance Corporation Taxable Revenue Bonds, 7.13% Series 1999A due October 20, 2021. Mississippi Power assumed the obligations in 2011 in connection with its election under its operating lease of Plant Daniel Units 3 and 4 to purchase the assets. The bonds were recorded at fair value at the date of assumption, or $346 million, reflecting a premium of $76 million. See "Secured Debt" herein for additional information.
At December 31, 2018 and 2017, Mississippi Power had $50 million of tax-exempt revenue bond obligations outstanding representing loans to Mississippi Power from a public authority of funds derived from the sale by such authority of revenue bonds issued to finance a portion of the costs of constructing the Kemper County energy facility.

COMBINED NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)
Southern Company and Subsidiary Companies 2018 Annual Report

Southern Company Gas
At December 31, 2018 and 2017, Nicor Gas had $1.3 billion and $1.0 billion, respectively, of first mortgage bonds outstanding. These bonds have been issued with maturities ranging from 2019 to 2058. See "Secured Debt" herein for additional information.
Prior to its sale, in the second quarter 2018, Pivotal Utility Holdings caused $200 million aggregate principal amount of gas facility revenue bonds to be redeemed.
Nicor Gas issued $300 million aggregate principal amount of first mortgage bonds in a private placement, of which $100 million was issued in August 2018 and $200 million was issued in November 2018.
At both December 31, 2018 and 2017, Atlanta Gas Light had $159 million of medium-term notes outstanding.
Capital Leases
Assets acquired under capital leases are recorded in the balance sheets as property, plant, and equipment and the related obligations are classified as long-term debt. See Note 5 under "Capital Leases" for additional information.
Southern Company
At December 31, 2018 and 2017, SCS had capital lease obligations of approximately $178 million and $177 million, respectively, for an office building and certain computer equipment including desktops, laptops, servers, printers, and storage devices with annual interest rates that range from 1.6% to 4.7%.
Georgia Power
At December 31, 2018 and 2017, Georgia Power had a capital lease obligation for its corporate headquarters building of $15 million and $22 million, respectively, with an annual interest rate of 7.9%. For ratemaking purposes, the Georgia PSC has allowed the lease payments in cost of service with no return on the capital lease asset. The difference between the depreciation and the lease payments allowed for ratemaking purposes is recovered as operating expenses as ordered by the Georgia PSC. The annual operating expense incurred for this capital lease was not material for any year presented.
At December 31, 2018 and 2017, Georgia Power had capital lease obligations related to two affiliate PPAs with Southern Power of $128 million and $132 million, respectively. The annual interest rates range from 11% to 12% for these two capital lease PPAs. For ratemaking purposes, the Georgia PSC has included the capital lease asset amortization in cost of service and the interest in Georgia Power's cost of debt. See Note 1 under "Affiliate Transactions" and Note 9 under "Fuel and Power Purchase AgreementsAffiliate" for additional information.
Secured Debt
Each of Southern Company's subsidiaries is organized as a legal entity, separate and apart from Southern Company and its other subsidiaries. There are no agreements or other arrangements among the Southern Company system companies under which the assets of one company have been pledged or otherwise made available to satisfy obligations of Southern Company or any of its other subsidiaries.
Outstanding secured debt at December 31, 2018 and 2017 for the applicable registrants was as follows:
 
Georgia
Power
(a)
Mississippi
 Power(b)
Southern
Company
 Gas(c)
 (in millions)
December 31, 2018$2,767
$270
$1,325
December 31, 20172,779
270
1,025
(a)
Includes Georgia Power's FFB loans that are secured by a first priority lien on (i) Georgia Power's 45.7% undivided ownership interest in Plant Vogtle Units 3 and 4 (primarily the units under construction, the related real property, and any nuclear fuel loaded in the current tax yearreactor core) and carried forward from prior tax years that cannot be utilized(ii) Georgia Power's rights and obligations under the principal contracts relating to Plant Vogtle Units 3 and 4. These borrowings totaled $2.6 billion at both December 31, 2018 and 2017. See "Long-term DebtDOE Loan Guarantee Borrowings" herein for additional information. Also includes capital lease obligations of $142 million and $154 million at December 31, 2018 and 2017, respectively. See "Long-term DebtCapital LeasesGeorgia Power" herein for additional information.
(b)
The revenue bonds assumed in the current tax yearconjunction with Mississippi Power's purchase of Plant Daniel Units 3 and 4 are reclassified from current to deferred taxes in federal income tax expense above. ITCssecured by Plant Daniel Units 3 and PTCs reclassified in this manner include $316 million4 and certain related personal property. See "Long-term DebtOther Long-Term Debt" herein for 2017, $1.13 billionadditional information.
(c)
Nicor Gas' first mortgage bonds are secured by substantially all of Nicor Gas' properties. See "Long-term DebtOther Long-Term DebtSouthern Company Gas" herein for 2016, and $246 million for 2015. These ITCs and PTCs are included in the following table of temporary differences as unrealized tax credits.additional information.
    Table of Contents                                Index to Financial Statements

COMBINED NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)
Southern Power Company and Subsidiary Companies 20172018 Annual Report

The tax effectsAt December 31, 2018 and 2017, Gulf Power had $41 million of temporary differences betweensecured debt related to a lien on its property at Plant Daniel in connection with the carrying amountsissuance of assetstwo series of its pollution control revenue bonds, which are included in liabilities held for sale on Southern Company's balance sheet at December 31, 2018. On January 1, 2019, Southern Company completed its sale of Gulf Power to NextEra Energy. See Note 15 under "Southern Company's Sale of Gulf Power" for additional information.
Each registrant's senior notes, junior subordinated notes, pollution control and liabilities in the financial statementsother revenue bond obligations, bank term loans, credit facility borrowings, and theirnotes payable are effectively subordinated to all secured debt of each respective tax bases, which give rise to deferred tax assets and liabilities, areregistrant.
Bank Credit Arrangements
At December 31, 2018, committed credit arrangements with banks were as follows:
 20172016
 (in millions)
Deferred tax liabilities —  
Accelerated depreciation and other property basis differences$1,922
$2,440
Levelized capacity revenues26
28
Other6
27
Total deferred income tax liabilities1,954
2,495
Deferred tax assets —  
Federal effect of state deferred taxes42
53
Basis difference on ITCs184
292
Alternative minimum tax carryforward21
15
Unrealized tax credits2,002
1,685
Federal net operating loss (NOL)333
808
Deferred state tax assets77
60
Other partnership basis differences24
16
Other10
8
Total deferred income tax assets2,693
2,937
Valuation Allowance(13)
Net deferred income tax assets2,680
2,937
Total deferred income tax asset (liability)$726
$442
   
Recognized in the consolidated balance sheets:  
Accumulated deferred income taxes – assets$925
$594
Accumulated deferred income taxes – liability$(199)$(152)
 Expires   Executable Term Loans 
Expires Within
One Year
Company2019 2020 2022 Total 
Unused(d)
 
One
Year
 
Two
Years
 Term Out No Term Out
 (in millions)
Southern Company(a)
$
 $
 $2,000
 $2,000
 $1,999
 $
 $
 $
 $
Alabama Power33
 500
 800
 1,333
 1,333
 
 
 
 33
Georgia Power
 
 1,750
 1,750
 1,736
 
 
 
 
Mississippi Power100
 
 
 100
 100
 
 
 
 100
Southern Power(b)

 
 750
 750
 727
 
 
 
 
Southern Company Gas(c)

 
 1,900
 1,900
 1,895
 
 
 
 
Other30
 
 
 30
 30
 
 
 
 30
Southern Company Consolidated(e)
$163
 $500
 $7,200
 $7,863
 $7,820
 $
 $
 $
 $163
(a)Represents the Southern Company parent entity.
(b)Southern Power's subsidiaries are not parties to its bank credit arrangement.
(c)
Southern Company Gas provides a parent guarantee of the obligations of its subsidiary Southern Company Gas Capital, which is the borrower of $1.4 billion ($1.395 billion unused) of this arrangement. Southern Company Gas' committed credit arrangement also includes $500 million (all unused) for which Nicor Gas is the borrower and which is restricted for working capital needs of Nicor Gas. Pursuant to this multi-year credit arrangement, the allocations between Southern Company Gas Capital and Nicor Gas may be adjusted. See "Structural Considerations" herein for additional information.
(d)Amounts used are for letters of credit.
(e)
Excludes $280 million of committed credit arrangements of Gulf Power, which was sold on January 1, 2019. See Note 15 under "Southern Company's Sale of Gulf Power" for additional information.
Deferred tax liabilities are primarily the result of property-related timing differences, which increased due to bonus depreciation. However, the implementationMost of the Tax Reform Legislation significantly reducedbank credit arrangements require payment of commitment fees based on the amountunused portion of accumulated deferred income taxes at December 31, 2017.the commitments or the maintenance of compensating balances with the banks. Commitment fees average less than 1/4 of 1% for Southern Company, the traditional electric operating companies, Southern Power, Southern Company Gas, and Nicor Gas. Compensating balances are not legally restricted from withdrawal.
Deferred tax assets consist primarilySubject to applicable market conditions, Southern Company and its subsidiaries expect to renew or replace their bank credit arrangements as needed, prior to expiration. In connection therewith, Southern Company and its subsidiaries may extend the maturity dates and/or increase or decrease the lending commitments thereunder.
Southern Company's, Southern Company Gas', and Nicor Gas' credit arrangements contain covenants that limit debt levels to 70% of timing differences relatedtotal capitalization, as defined in the agreements, and most of the other subsidiaries' bank credit arrangements contain covenants that limit debt levels to 65% of total capitalization, as defined in the agreements. For purposes of these definitions, debt excludes the long-term debt payable to affiliated trusts and, in certain arrangements, other hybrid securities. Additionally, for Southern Company and Southern Power, for purposes of these definitions, debt would exclude any project debt incurred by certain subsidiaries of Southern Power to the carryforward of unrealized federal ITCs, PTCs, net operating loss,extent such debt is non-recourse to Southern Power and net basis differences on federal ITCs.
Tax Credit Carryforwards
capitalization would exclude the capital stock or other equity attributable to such subsidiaries. At December 31, 2017,2018, Southern Company, the traditional electric operating companies, Southern Power, Southern Company had federal ITCGas, and PTC carryforwards, which are expected to resultNicor Gas were each in $2.0 billion of federal income tax benefits. The federal ITC carryforwards begin expiring in 2034 but are expected to be fully utilized by 2027. The PTC carryforwards begin expiring in 2036 but are also expected to be fully utilized by 2027. The acquisition of additional renewable projects could further delay the utilization of existing tax credit carryforwards. The ultimate outcome of these matters cannot be determined at this time.compliance with their respective debt limit covenants.
Net Operating Loss
After carrying back portionsA portion of the federal NOL generated in 2016,unused credit with banks is allocated to provide liquidity support to the revenue bonds of the traditional electric operating companies and the commercial paper programs of Southern Company, had a consolidated federal NOL carryforwardthe traditional electric operating companies, Southern Power, Southern Company Gas, and Nicor Gas. The amount of approximately $2.3 billion at December 31, 2017. The federal NOL will expire in 2037 but is expected to be fully utilized by 2019. The ultimate outcomevariable rate revenue bonds of this matter cannot be determined at this time.the traditional electric
    Table of Contents                                Index to Financial Statements

COMBINED NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)
Southern Power Company and Subsidiary Companies 20172018 Annual Report

The Company had state NOL carryforwards of approximately $1.3 billionoperating companies outstanding requiring liquidity support at December 31, 2017, which will expire from 2029 to 2035. These carryforwards resulted in deferred tax assets2018 was approximately $1.6 billion (comprised of approximately $61$854 million as ofat Alabama Power, $659 million at Georgia Power, $82 million at Gulf Power, and $40 million at Mississippi Power). In addition, at December 31, 2017. The state NOL carryforwards by state jurisdiction were as follows:
JurisdictionApproximate NOL CarryforwardsApproximate Net State Income Tax BenefitTax Year NOL Expires
 (in millions) 
Oklahoma$978
$46
2035
Florida283
12
2033
South Carolina48
2
2035
Other states23
1
2029-2035
Balance at year end$1,332
$61
 
Effective Tax Rate
A reconciliation2018, the traditional electric operating companies had approximately $403 million (comprised of approximately $345 million at Georgia Power and $58 million at Gulf Power) of revenue bonds outstanding that are required to be remarketed within the federal statutory income tax ratenext 12 months. See Note 15 under "Southern Company's Sale of Gulf Power" for information regarding the sale of Gulf Power on January 1, 2019. Subsequent to the effective income tax rate is as follows:
 2017 2016 2015
Federal statutory rate35.0 % 35.0 % 35.0 %
State income tax, net of federal deduction(22.2) (9.1) (0.3)
Amortization of ITC(31.8) (20.6) (5.0)
ITC basis difference(10.0) (89.0) (21.5)
Production tax credits(72.5) (23.3) (0.6)
Tax Reform Legislation(416.1) 
 
Noncontrolling interests(8.6) (6.2) (1.7)
Other0.5
 4.6
 2.5
Effective income tax rate (benefit)(525.7)% (108.6)% 8.4 %
The Company's effective tax rate decreased in 2017 primarily due to the Tax Reform Legislation. The decrease in 2016 was primarily due to changes in federal ITCs and PTCs.
The Company's deferred federal ITCs are amortized to income tax expense over the lifeDecember 31, 2018, Georgia Power redeemed approximately $108 million of the respective asset. ITCs amortized in this manner amounted to $57 million in 2017, $37 million in 2016, and $19 million in 2015. Also, the Company received cashobligations related to federal ITCs under the renewable energy incentivesoutstanding variable rate pollution control revenue bonds.
In addition to its credit arrangement described above, Southern Power also has a $120 million continuing letter of $162 millioncredit facility expiring in 2021 for the year endedstandby letters of credit. At December 31, 2015. While no cash2018, $103 million has been used for letters of credit, primarily as credit support for PPA requirements, and $17 million was received relatedunused. At December 31, 2017, the total amount available under this facility was $19 million. Southern Power's subsidiaries are not parties to these incentives in 2017 or 2016, the Company recognized tax credits. Furthermore, the tax basisthis letter of the asset is reduced by 50% of the ITCs received, resulting in a net deferred tax asset. The Company has elected to recognize the tax benefit of this basis difference as a reduction to income tax expense in the year in which the plant reaches commercial operation. The tax benefit of the related basis differences reduced income tax expense by $18 million in 2017, $173 million in 2016,credit facility. Also, at December 31, 2018 and $54 million in 2015. The tax benefit of PTCs reduced income tax expense by $129 million in 2017, $42 million in 2016 and $1 million in 2015. See "Unrecognized Tax Benefits" herein for further information.
Legal Entity Reorganization
In September 2017, Southern Power began a legal entity reorganizationhad $103 million and $113 million, respectively, of various directcash collateral posted related to PPA requirements, which is included in other deferred charges and indirect subsidiariesassets in Southern Power's consolidated balance sheets.
Notes Payable
Southern Company, Alabama Power, Georgia Power, Southern Power, Southern Company Gas, Nicor Gas, and SEGCO make short-term borrowings primarily through commercial paper programs that own and operate substantially allhave the liquidity support of the solar facilities,committed bank credit arrangements described above under "Bank Credit Arrangements." Southern Power's subsidiaries are not parties to its commercial paper program. Southern Company Gas maintains commercial paper programs at Southern Company Gas Capital and at Nicor Gas. Nicor Gas' commercial paper program supports working capital needs at Nicor Gas as Nicor Gas is not permitted to make money pool loans to affiliates. All of Southern Company Gas' other subsidiaries benefit from Southern Company Gas Capital's commercial paper program. See "Structural Considerations" herein for additional information.
In addition, Southern Company and certain of its subsidiaries have entered into various bank term loan agreements. Unless otherwise stated, the proceeds of these loans were used to repay existing indebtedness and for general corporate purposes, including certainworking capital and, for the subsidiaries, owned in partnership with various third parties. The reorganization included the purchase of all of the redeemable noncontrolling interests, representing 10% of the membership interests, in Southern Turner Renewable Energy, LLC. The reorganization is expected to be substantially completed in the first quarter 2018 and is expected to result in estimated tax benefits totaling between $50 million and $55 million related to certain changes in state apportionment rates and net operating loss carryforward utilization that will be recorded in the first quarter 2018. The ultimate outcome of this matter cannot be determined at this time.their continuous construction programs.
    Table of Contents                                Index to Financial Statements

COMBINED NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)
Southern Power Company and Subsidiary Companies 20172018 Annual Report

Unrecognized Tax Benefits
Changes duringCommercial paper and short-term bank term loans are included in notes payable in the year in unrecognized tax benefitsbalance sheets. Details of short-term borrowings were as follows:
 2017 2016 2015
 (in millions)
Balance at beginning of year$17
 $8
 $5
Tax positions increase from current periods
 17
 9
Tax positions decrease from prior periods(17) (8) (6)
Balance at end of year$
 $17
 $8
 Notes Payable at December 31, 2018 Notes Payable at December 31, 2017
 
Amount
Outstanding
 
Weighted Average
Interest Rate
 
Amount
Outstanding
 
Weighted Average
Interest Rate
 (in millions)   (in millions)  
Southern Company       
Commercial paper$1,064
 3.0% $1,832
 1.8%
Short-term bank debt1,851
 3.1% 607
 2.3%
Total$2,915
 3.1% $2,439
 1.9%
        
Alabama Power       
Short-term bank debt$
 % $3
 3.7%
        
Georgia Power       
Commercial paper$294
 3.1% $
 %
Short-term bank debt
 % 150
 2.2%
Total$294
 3.1% $150
 2.2%
        
Mississippi Power       
Short-term bank debt$
 % $4
 3.8%
        
Southern Power       
Commercial paper$
 % $105
 2.0%
Short-term bank debt100
 3.1% 
 %
Total$100
 3.1% $105
 2.0%
        
Southern Company Gas       
Commercial paper:       
Southern Company Gas Capital$403
 3.1% $1,243
 1.7%
Nicor Gas247
 3.0% 275
 1.8%
Total$650
 3.0% $1,518
 1.8%
The increaseoutstanding bank term loans at December 31, 2018 have covenants that limit debt levels to a percentage of total capitalization. The percentage is 70% for Southern Company and 65% for Alabama Power and Southern Power, as defined in unrecognized tax benefitsthe agreements. For purposes of these definitions, debt excludes any long-term debt payable to affiliated trusts and other hybrid securities. Additionally, for Southern Company and Southern Power, for purposes of these definitions, debt excludes any project debt incurred by certain subsidiaries of Southern Power to the extent such debt is non-recourse to Southern Power and capitalization excludes the capital stock or other equity attributable to such subsidiary. At December 31, 2018, each of Southern Company, Alabama Power, and Southern Power was in compliance with its debt limits.
Except as otherwise described herein, Southern Company and its subsidiaries used the proceeds of bank loans for long-term debt redemptions and maturities, to repay short-term indebtedness, and for general corporate purposes, including working capital.
In March 2018, Southern Company entered into a $900 million short-term floating rate bank loan bearing interest based on one-month LIBOR, which was repaid in August 2018.
In April 2018, Southern Company borrowed $250 million pursuant to a short-term uncommitted bank credit arrangement, bearing interest at a rate agreed upon by Southern Company and the bank from current periodstime to time and payable on no less than 30 days' demand by the bank. Subsequent to December 31, 2018, Southern Company repaid this loan.
In June 2018, Southern Company repaid at maturity two $100 million short-term floating rate bank term loans.

COMBINED NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)
Southern Company and Subsidiary Companies 2018 Annual Report

In August 2018, Southern Company entered into a $1.5 billion short-term floating rate bank loan bearing interest based on one-month LIBOR, and repaid $250 million borrowed in August 2017 pursuant to a short-term uncommitted bank credit arrangement. Subsequent to December 31, 2018, Southern Company repaid this loan.
In January 2018, Georgia Power repaid its outstanding $150 million floating rate bank loan due May 31, 2018.
In March 2018, Mississippi Power entered into a $300 million short-term floating rate bank loan bearing interest based on one-month LIBOR, of which $200 million was repaid in the second quarter 2018 and $100 million was repaid in the third quarter 2018.
In May 2018, Southern Power entered into two short-term floating rate bank loans, each for an aggregate principal amount of $100 million, which bear interest based on one-month LIBOR. In November 2018, Southern Power repaid one of these short-term loans.
In January 2018, Southern Company Gas issued a floating rate promissory note to Southern Company in an aggregate principal amount of $100 million bearing interest based on one-month LIBOR. In March 2018, Southern Company Gas repaid this promissory note.
In April 2018, Pivotal Utility Holdings, as borrower, and Southern Company Gas, as guarantor, entered into a $181 million short-term delayed draw floating rate bank term loan bearing interest based on one-month LIBOR. In July 2018, Pivotal Utility Holdings repaid this short-term loan.
In May 2018, Southern Company Gas Capital borrowed $95 million pursuant to a short-term uncommitted bank credit arrangement, guaranteed by Southern Company Gas, bearing interest at a rate agreed upon by Southern Company Gas Capital and the bank from time to time and payable on no less than 30 days' demand by the bank. In July 2018, Southern Company Gas Capital repaid this loan.
Outstanding Classes of Capital Stock
Southern Company
Common Stock
Stock Issued
During 2018, Southern Company issued approximately 11.6 million shares of common stock primarily through employee equity compensation plans and received proceeds of approximately $442 million.
In addition, during the third and fourth quarters 2018, Southern Company issued a total of approximately 12.1 million and 2.5 million shares, respectively, of common stock through at-the-market issuances pursuant to sales agency agreements related to Southern Company's continuous equity offering program and received cash proceeds of approximately $540 million and $108 million, respectively, net of $5 million and $1 million in commissions, respectively.
Shares Reserved
At December 31, 2018, a total of 92 million shares were reserved for issuance pursuant to the Southern Investment Plan, employee savings plans, the Outside Directors Stock Plan, the Omnibus Incentive Compensation Plan (which includes stock options and performance share units as discussed in Note 12), and an at-the-market program. Of the total 92 million shares reserved, there were 10 million shares of common stock remaining available for awards under the Omnibus Incentive Compensation Plan at December 31, 2018.

COMBINED NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)
Southern Company and Subsidiary Companies 2018 Annual Report

Diluted Earnings Per Share
For Southern Company, the only difference in computing basic and diluted earnings per share (EPS) is attributable to awards outstanding under the stock option and performance share plans. The effect of both stock options and performance share award units was determined using the treasury stock method. Shares used to compute diluted EPS were as follows:
 Average Common Stock Shares
 2018 2017 2016
 (in millions)
As reported shares1,020
 1,000
 951
Effect of options and performance share award units5
 8
 7
Diluted shares1,025
 1,008
 958
Stock options and performance share award units that were not included in the diluted EPS calculation because they were anti-dilutive were immaterial in all years presented.
Redeemable Preferred Stock of Subsidiaries
Prior to 2017, each of the traditional electric operating companies had outstanding preferred and/or preference stock. During 2017, Alabama Power and Gulf Power redeemed all of their outstanding preference stock and Georgia Power redeemed all of its outstanding preferred and preference stock. During 2018, Mississippi Power redeemed all of its outstanding preferred stock. The remaining preferred stock of Alabama Power contains a feature that allows the holders to elect a majority of such subsidiary's board of directors if preferred dividends are not paid for four consecutive quarters. Because such a potential redemption-triggering event is not solely within the control of Alabama Power, this preferred stock is presented as "Redeemable Preferred Stock of Subsidiaries" on Southern Company's balance sheets and statements of capitalization in a manner consistent with temporary equity under applicable accounting standards.
The following table presents changes during the decreaseyear in redeemable preferred stock of subsidiaries for Southern Company:
 Redeemable Preferred Stock of Subsidiaries
 (in millions)
Balance at December 31, 2015 and 2016:$118
Issued(a)
250
Redeemed(a)
(38)
Issuance costs(a)
(6)
Balance at December 31, 2017:324
Redeemed(b)
(33)
Balance at December 31, 2018:$291
(a)
See "Alabama Power" herein for additional information.
(b)
See "Mississippi Power" herein for additional information.
Alabama Power
Alabama Power has preferred stock, Class A preferred stock, and common stock outstanding. Alabama Power also has authorized preference stock, none of which is outstanding. Alabama Power's preferred stock and Class A preferred stock, without preference between classes, rank senior to Alabama Power's common stock with respect to payment of dividends and voluntary and involuntary dissolution. The preferred stock and Class A preferred stock of Alabama Power contain a feature that allows the holders to elect a majority of Alabama Power's board of directors if preferred dividends are not paid for four consecutive quarters. Because such a potential redemption-triggering event is not solely within the control of Alabama Power, the preferred stock and Class A preferred stock is presented as "Redeemable Preferred Stock" on Alabama Power's balance sheets and statements of capitalization in a manner consistent with temporary equity under applicable accounting standards.
Alabama Power's preferred stock is subject to redemption at a price equal to the par value plus a premium. Alabama Power's Class A preferred stock is subject to redemption at a price equal to the stated capital. All series of Alabama Power's preferred stock currently are subject to redemption at the option of Alabama Power. The Class A preferred stock is subject to redemption on or

COMBINED NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)
Southern Company and Subsidiary Companies 2018 Annual Report

after October 1, 2022, or following the occurrence of a rating agency event. Information for each outstanding series is in the table below:
Preferred StockPar Value/Stated Capital Per Share Shares Outstanding 
Redemption
Price Per Share
4.92% Preferred Stock$100 80,000
 $103.23
4.72% Preferred Stock$100 50,000
 $102.18
4.64% Preferred Stock$100 60,000
 $103.14
4.60% Preferred Stock$100 100,000
 $104.20
4.52% Preferred Stock$100 50,000
 $102.93
4.20% Preferred Stock$100 135,115
 $105.00
5.00% Class A Preferred Stock$25 10,000,000
 
Stated Capital(*)
(*)Prior to October 1, 2022: $25.50; on or after October 1, 2022: Stated Capital
In September 2017, Alabama Power issued 10 million shares ($250 million aggregate stated capital) of 5.00% Class A Preferred Stock, Cumulative, Par Value $1 Per Share (Stated Capital $25 Per Share). The proceeds were used in October 2017 to redeem all 2 million shares ($50 million aggregate stated capital) of 6.50% Series Preference Stock, 6 million shares ($150 million aggregate stated capital) of 6.45% Series Preference Stock, and 1.52 million shares ($38 million aggregate stated capital) of 5.83% Class A Preferred Stock and for other general corporate purposes, including Alabama Power's continuous construction program.
There were no changes for the year ended December 31, 2018 in redeemable preferred stock of Alabama Power.
Georgia Power
Georgia Power has preferred stock, Class A preferred stock, preference stock, and common stock authorized, but only common stock outstanding as of December 31, 2018 and 2017. In October 2017, Georgia Power redeemed all 1.8 million shares ($45 million aggregate liquidation amount) of its 6.125% Series Class A Preferred Stock and 2.25 millionshares ($225 millionaggregate liquidation amount) of its 6.50% Series 2007A Preference Stock.
Mississippi Power
Mississippi Power has preferred stock and common stock authorized, but only common stock outstanding as of December 31, 2018. Mississippi Power previously had preferred stock that contained a feature allowing the holders to elect a majority of Mississippi Power's board of directors if preferred dividends were not paid for four consecutive quarters. Because such a potential redemption-triggering event was not solely within the control of Mississippi Power, this preferred stock was presented as "Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Stock" on Mississippi Power's balance sheets and statements of capitalization in a manner consistent with temporary equity under applicable accounting standards.
On October 23, 2018, Mississippi Power completed the redemption of all 8,867 outstanding shares ($886,700 aggregate par value) of its 4.40% Series Preferred Stock, all 8,643 outstanding shares ($864,300 aggregate par value) of its 4.60% Series Preferred Stock, all 16,700 outstanding shares ($1.67 million aggregate par value) of its 4.72% Series Preferred Stock, and all 1,200,000 outstanding depositary shares ($30 million aggregate stated value), each representing a 1/4th interest in a share of its 5.25% Series Preferred Stock.
Dividend Restrictions
The income of Southern Company is derived primarily from prior periodsequity in earnings of its subsidiaries. At December 31, 2018, consolidated retained earnings included $4.9 billion of undistributed retained earnings of the subsidiaries.
The traditional electric operating companies and Southern Power can only pay dividends to Southern Company out of retained earnings or paid-in-capital.
See Note 7 under "Southern Power" for all years presented, primarily relateinformation regarding the distribution requirements for certain Southern Power subsidiaries.
The authority of the natural gas distribution utilities to federal income tax benefits from deferred ITCspay dividends to Southern Company Gas is subject to regulation. By regulation, Nicor Gas is restricted, to the extent of its retained earnings balance, in the amount it can dividend or loan to affiliates and would all impact the Company's effective tax rate, if recognized. The impact on the effective tax rate is determined based onnot permitted to make money pool loans to affiliates. At December 31, 2018, the amount of ITCs whichSouthern Company Gas' subsidiary retained earnings restricted for dividend payment totaled $814 million.

COMBINED NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)
Southern Company and Subsidiary Companies 2018 Annual Report

Structural Considerations
Since Southern Company and Southern Company Gas are uncertain.
Theholding companies, the right of Southern Company classifies interest on tax uncertainties as interest expense. Accrued interest for unrecognized tax benefits was immaterial for all periods presented. Theand Southern Company did not accrueGas and, hence, the right of creditors of Southern Company or Southern Company Gas to participate in any penalties on uncertain tax positions.
It is reasonably possible that the amountdistribution of the unrecognized tax benefits could change within 12 months. The settlementassets of federal and state audits could impact the balances. At this time, an estimate of the range of reasonably possible outcomes cannot be determined.
The IRS has finalized its auditsany respective subsidiary of Southern Company's consolidated federal income tax returns through 2016.Company or Southern Company Gas, whether upon liquidation, reorganization or otherwise, is subject to prior claims of creditors and preferred stockholders of such subsidiary.
Southern Company Gas' 100%-owned subsidiary, Southern Company Gas Capital, was established to provide for certain of Southern Company Gas' ongoing financing needs through a participant incommercial paper program, the Compliance Assurance Processissuance of the IRS. The auditsvarious debt, hybrid securities, and other financing arrangements. Southern Company Gas fully and unconditionally guarantees all debt issued by Southern Company Gas Capital. Nicor Gas is not permitted by regulation to make loans to affiliates or utilize Southern Company Gas Capital for the Company's state income tax returns have either been concluded, or the statute of limitations has expired, for years prior to 2011.
6. FINANCINGits financing needs.
Southern Power Company's senior notes, bank term loans, commercial paper, and Facilitybank credit arrangement (as defined herein) are unsecured senior indebtedness, which rank equally with all other unsecured and unsubordinated debt of Southern Power Company. The Company'sSouthern Power's subsidiaries are not issuers, borrowers, or obligors, as applicable, under the senior notes, borrowings from financial institutions, commercial paper, or the Facility.bank credit arrangement. The senior notes, borrowings from financial institutions, commercial paper, and the Facilitybank credit arrangement are effectively subordinated to any future secured debt of Southern Power Company and any potential claims of creditors of the Company'sSouthern Power's subsidiaries. As of December 31, 2017, the Company had no secured debt.
Securities Due Within One Year
At December 31, 2017, the Company had $420 million in term loans and $350 million of senior notes due within one year. At December 31, 2016, the Company had a $60 million term loan, $500 million of senior notes, and $1 million of long-term notes due within one year.
Maturities of long-term debt for the next five years are as follows:
 December 31, 2017
 (in millions)
2018$770
2019600
2020825
2021300
2022(*)
677
(*)Represents euro-denominated debt at the U.S. dollar denominated hedge settlement amount.
Senior Notes
In November 2017, the Company issued $525 million aggregate principal amount of Series 2017A Floating Rate Senior Notes due December 20, 2020, which bear interest based on three-month LIBOR. The net proceeds were used to redeem all of the $500 million aggregate principal amount of Series 2015D 1.85% Senior Notes due December 1, 2017 and to repay a portion of the Company's outstanding short-term debt.
    Table of Contents                                Index to Financial Statements

COMBINED NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)
Southern Power Company and Subsidiary Companies 20172018 Annual Report

At December 31, 2017 and 2016, the Company had $5.5 billion and $5.3 billion of senior notes outstanding, respectively, which included senior notes due within one year.
Other Long-Term Notes
In September 2017, the Company amended its $60 million aggregate principal amount floating rate term loan to, among other things, increase the aggregate principal amount to $100 million and extend the maturity date from September 2017 to October 2018. The additional $40 million of proceeds were used to repay existing indebtedness and for other general corporate purposes.
At December 31, 2017, outstanding term loans were included in securities due within one year.
The outstanding term loans as of December 31, 2017 have a covenant that limits debt levels to 65% of total capitalization, as defined in the agreements. For purposes of this definition, debt excludes any project debt incurred by certain subsidiaries of the company to the extent such debt is non-recourse to the company, and capitalization excludes the capital stock or other equity attributable to such subsidiary.
At December 31, 2017, the Company was in compliance with its debt limits.
Bank Credit Arrangements
Company Credit Facilities
At December 31, 2017, the Company had a committed credit facility (Facility) of $750 million expiring in 2022, of which $22 million has been used for letters of credit and $728 million remains unused. In May 2017, the Company amended the Facility, which, among other things, extended the maturity date from 2020 to 2022 and increased the Company's borrowing ability under the Facility to $750 million from $600 million. Proceeds from the Facility may be used for working capital and general corporate purposes as well as liquidity support for the Company's commercial paper program. As of December 31, 2016, $78 million was used for letters of credit and $522 million remained unused. The Facility does not contain a material adverse change clause at the time of borrowing. Subject to applicable market conditions, the Company expects to renew or replace the Facility, as needed, prior to expiration. In connection therewith, the Company may extend the maturity date and/or increase or decrease the lending commitment thereunder. The Company's subsidiaries are not parties to the Facility.
The Company is required to pay a commitment fee on the unused balance of the Facility. This fee is less than 1/4 of 1%. The Facility contains a covenant that limits the ratio of debt to capitalization (each as defined in the Facility) to a maximum of 65%. For purposes of this definition, debt excludes any project debt incurred by certain subsidiaries of the Company to the extent such debt is non-recourse to the Company, and capitalization excludes the capital stock or other equity attributable to such subsidiary. At December 31, 2017, the Company was in compliance with its debt limits.
The Company also has a $120 million continuing letter of credit facility expiring in 2019 for standby letters of credit. At December 31, 2017, $101 million has been used for letters of credit, primarily as credit support for PPA requirements, and $19 million remains unused. At December 31, 2016, the total amount available under this facility was $82 million. The Company's subsidiaries are not parties to this letter of credit facility.
In addition, at both December 31, 2017 and 2016, the Company has $113 million of cash collateral posted related to PPA requirements, which is included in other deferred charges and assets in the consolidated balance sheets.
Commercial Paper Program
The Company's commercial paper program is used to finance acquisition and construction costs related to electric generating facilities and for general corporate purposes. The Company's subsidiaries are not parties to the commercial paper program. Commercial paper is included in notes payable in the consolidated balance sheets as noted below:
 
Commercial Paper at the
End of the Period
 Amount Outstanding Weighted Average Interest Rate
 (in millions)  
December 31, 2017$105
 2.0%
December 31, 2016$
 N/A

NOTES (continued)
Southern Power Company and Subsidiary Companies 2017 Annual Report

Subsidiary Project Credit Facilities
In connection with the construction of solar facilities by RE Tranquillity LLC, RE Garland Holdings LLC, and RE Roserock LLC, indirect subsidiaries of the Company, each subsidiary had entered into separate credit agreements (Project Credit Facilities), which were non-recourse to the Company (other than the subsidiary party to the agreement). Each Project Credit Facility provided (a) a senior secured construction loan credit facility, (b) a senior secured bridge loan facility, and (c) a senior secured letter of credit facility that was secured by the membership interests of the respective project company, with proceeds directed to finance project costs related to the respective solar facilities. Each Project Credit Facility was secured by the assets of the applicable project subsidiary and membership interests of the applicable project subsidiary. The Tranquillity and Garland Project Credit Facilities were fully repaid on October 14, 2016 and December 29, 2016, respectively. The table below summarizes the Roserock Project Credit Facility as of December 31, 2016, which was extended to January 31, 2017 and fully repaid on January 17, 2017.
   Construction Loan Facility Bridge Loan Facility Total Loan Facility Loan Facility Undrawn Letter of Credit Facility Letter of Credit Facility Undrawn
   (in millions)
December 31, 2016  $63
 $180
 $243
 $34
 $23
 $16
The Project Credit Facilities had no amount outstanding at December 31, 2017 and $209 million outstanding with a weighted average interest rate of 2.1% as of December 31, 2016.
Assets Subject to Lien
Under the terms of the PPA and the expansion PPA for the Mankato project, approximately $442 million of assets, primarily related to property, plant, and equipment, are subject to lien at December 31, 2017. See Note 11 for additional information.
Roserock is in a litigation dispute with McCarthy regarding damage to certain solar panels during installation. In connection therewith, Roserock is withholding payments of approximately $26 million from McCarthy, and McCarthy has filed mechanic's liens on the Roserock facility for the same amount. See Note 3 for additional information.
Dividend Restrictions
The Company can only pay dividends to Southern Company out of retained earnings or paid-in-capital.9. COMMITMENTS
7. COMMITMENTS
Fuel and Power Purchase Agreements
SCS, as agent for the Company and the traditional electric operating companies, has entered into various fuel transportation and procurement agreements toNon-Affiliate
To supply a portion of the fuel (primarily natural gas) requirements forof the Company'sSouthern Company system's electric generating facilities. These purchase obligations areplants, the Southern Company system has entered into various long-term commitments not recognized on the Company's consolidated balance sheets. The Company incurred fuel expense of $621 million, $456 million, and $441 millionsheets for the years ended December 31,procurement and delivery of fossil fuel and, for Alabama Power and Georgia Power, nuclear fuel. Fuel expense in 2018, 2017, and 2016 and 2015, respectively,for the Southern Company system is shown below, the majority of which was purchased under long-term commitments. The Company
 Southern Company
Alabama
Power
Georgia
Power
Mississippi Power
Southern
Power
 (in millions)
2018$4,637
$1,301
$1,698
$405
$699
20174,400
1,225
1,671
395
621
20164,361
1,297
1,807
343
456
Each registrant expects that a substantial amount of its future fuel needs will continue to be purchased under long-term commitments.
The traditional electric operating companies have entered into various non-affiliate long-term PPAs, some of which are accounted for as leases. For Alabama Power and Georgia Power, most long-term PPAs include capacity and energy components. Mississippi Power's long-term PPAs are associated with solar facilities and only include an energy component. For the traditional electric operating companies, the energy-related costs associated with PPAs are recoverable through fuel cost recovery provisions.
Total capacity expense under these non-affiliate PPAs accounted for as operating leases in 2018, 2017, and 2016 was as follows:
 Southern Company
Alabama
Power
Georgia
Power
 (in millions)
2018$231
$44
$113
2017235
41
118
2016232
42
113
In addition, Georgia Power's non-affiliate energy-only solar PPAs accounted for as leases contained contingent rent expense of $43 million, $44 million, and $18 million for 2018, 2017, and 2016, respectively. Mississippi Power's energy-only solar PPAs accounted for as operating leases contained contingent rent expense of $10 million, $5 million, and an immaterial amount for 2018, 2017, and 2016, respectively. Contingent rents are recognized as services are performed.
Estimated total obligations under non-affiliate PPAs accounted for as operating leases at December 31, 2018 were as follows:
 Southern CompanyAlabama Power
Georgia
Power
 (in millions)
2019$161
$41
$120
2020164
42
122
2021168
44
124
2022171
46
125
2023127

127
2024 and thereafter642

642
Total$1,433
$173
$1,260
In addition, Georgia Power has commitments regarding a portion of a 5% interest in the original cost of Plant Vogtle Units 1 and 2 owned by MEAG Power that are in effect until the latter of the retirement of the plant or the latest stated maturity date of MEAG Power's bonds issued to finance such ownership interest. The payments for capacity are required whether or not any capacity is

COMBINED NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)
Southern Company and Subsidiary Companies 2018 Annual Report

available. The energy cost is a function of each unit's variable operating costs. Portions of the capacity payments relate to costs in excess of MEAG Power's Plant Vogtle Units 1 and 2 allowed investment for ratemaking purposes. The present value of these portions at the time of the disallowance was written off. Generally, the cost of such capacity and energy is included in purchased power in Southern Company's statements of income and in purchased power, non-affiliates in Georgia Power's statements of income. Georgia Power's capacity payments related to this commitment totaled $8 million, $9 million, and $11 million in 2018, 2017, and 2016, respectively. At December 31, 2018, Georgia Power's estimated long-term obligations related to this commitment totaled $59 million, consisting of $6 million for 2019, $5 million for 2020, $5 million for 2021, $4 million for 2022, $3 million for 2023, and $36 million for 2024 and thereafter.
SCS may enter into various types of wholesale energy and natural gas contracts acting as an agent for the Company and Southern Company's traditional electric operating companies.companies and Southern Power. Under these agreements, each of the traditional electric operating companies and the CompanySouthern Power may be jointly and severally liable. Accordingly, Southern Company has entered into keep-well agreements with each of the traditional electric operating companies to ensure they will not subsidize or be responsible for any costs, losses, liabilities, or damages resulting from the inclusion of the CompanySouthern Power as a contracting party under these agreements.
Operating Leases
The CompanyAffiliate
Georgia Power has operating lease agreementsalso entered into affiliate long-term PPAs with various terms and expiration dates. Total rentSouthern Power, some of which Georgia Power accounts for as leases. Georgia Power's total capacity expense under these affiliate PPAs accounted for as leases was $29$93 million, $22$107 million, and $7$133 million in 2018, 2017, and 2016, respectively. In addition, Georgia Power's energy-only solar PPAs with Southern Power accounted for the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016, and 2015, respectively. These amounts includeas leases contained contingent rent expense related to landof $29 million, $29 million, and $21 million for 2018, 2017, and 2016, respectively.
Georgia Power's estimated total obligations under affiliate PPAs accounted for as leases based on wind production and escalation in the Consumer Price Index for All Urban Consumers. The Company excludes contingent rent but includes step rents, fixed escalations, lease concessions, and lease extensions in its computation of minimum lease payments, which are recognized on a straight-line basis over the minimum lease term. As ofat December 31, 2017,2018 were as follows:
 Georgia Power
 Affiliate Capital Lease PPAs 
Affiliate Operating
Lease PPAs
 (in millions)
2019$23
 $64
202023
 65
202124
 66
202224
 68
202325
 69
2024 and thereafter158
 349
Total$277
 $681
Less: amounts representing executory costs(a)
42
  
Net minimum lease payments235
  
Less: amounts representing interest(b)
105
  
Present value of net minimum lease payments$130
  
(a)
Executory costs such as taxes, maintenance, and insurance (including the estimated profit thereon) are estimated and included in total minimum lease payments.
(b)Calculated using an adjusted incremental borrowing rate to reduce the present value of the net minimum lease payments to fair value.
See Note 8 under operating leases were $22"Long-term DebtCapital LeasesGeorgia Power" for additional information.
Pipeline Charges, Storage Capacity, and Gas Supply
Southern Company Gas has commitments for pipeline charges, storage capacity, and gas supply, which include charges recoverable through natural gas cost recovery mechanisms, or alternatively, billed to marketers selling retail natural gas, as well as demand charges associated with Southern Company Gas' wholesale gas services. Gas supply commitments include amounts for gas commodity purchases associated with Southern Company Gas' gas marketing services of 47 million mmBtu at floating gas prices calculated using forward natural gas prices at December 31, 2018 and valued at $150 million. Southern Company Gas provides guarantees to certain gas suppliers for certain of its subsidiaries in eachsupport of 2018, 2019, and 2020, $23 million in each of 2021 and 2022, and $815 million in 2023 and thereafter. The majority of the committed future expenditures are related to land leases for solar and wind facilities.payment obligations.
    Table of Contents                                Index to Financial Statements

COMBINED NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)
Southern Power Company and Subsidiary Companies 20172018 Annual Report

Southern Company Gas' expected future contractual obligations for pipeline charges, storage capacity, and gas supply that are not recognized on the balance sheets at December 31, 2018 were as follows:
 Pipeline Charges, Storage Capacity, and Gas Supply
 (in millions)
2019$781
2020584
2021520
2022489
2023412
2024 and thereafter1,871
Total$4,657
Operating Leases
In addition to the operating lease PPAs discussed previously, the Southern Company system has operating lease agreements with various terms and expiration dates. The traditional electric operating companies' operating leases primarily relate to facilities, coal railcars, vehicles, cellular tower space, and other equipment. Southern Power's operating leases primarily relate to land for solar and wind facilities and are recognized on a straight-line basis over the minimum lease term, plus any renewal periods necessary to cover the expected life of the respective facility. Southern Company Gas' operating leases primarily relate to facilities and vehicles.
Total rent expense for 2018, 2017, and 2016 was as follows:
 
Southern Company(*)
Alabama Power
Georgia
Power
Mississippi Power
Southern Power(*)
 (in millions)
2018$192
$23
$34
$4
$31
2017176
25
31
3
29
2016169
18
28
3
22
(*)Includes contingent rent expense related to Southern Power's land leases based on wind production and escalation in the Consumer Price Index for All Urban Consumers.
 Southern Company Gas
 (in millions)
2018$15
201715
Successor – July 1, 2016 through December 31, 20168
Predecessor – January 1, 2016 through June 30, 20166

COMBINED NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)
Southern Company and Subsidiary Companies 2018 Annual Report

The registrants exclude contingent rent but include any step rents, fixed escalations, lease concessions, and lease extensions to cover the expected life of the facility in the computation of minimum lease payments. At December 31, 2018, estimated minimum lease payments under operating leases were as follows:
 Southern CompanyAlabama Power
Georgia
Power
Mississippi PowerSouthern Power
Southern Company
Gas
 (in millions)
2019$156
$12
$23
$3
$23
$18
2020134
10
18
2
24
16
2021110
7
9
1
24
15
202298
6
6
1
24
13
202379
3
5
1
26
10
2024 and thereafter1,040
1
13
2
874
34
Total$1,617
$39
$74
$10
$995
$106
For the traditional electric operating companies, a majority of the railcar and barge lease expenses are recoverable through fuel cost recovery provisions.
In addition to the above rental commitments, Alabama Power and Georgia Power have potential obligations upon expiration of certain railcar leases with respect to the residual value of the leased property. These leases have terms expiring in 2023 for Alabama Power and in 2024 for Georgia Power with maximum obligations under these leases of $12 million for Alabama Power and $9 million for Georgia Power. At the termination of the leases, Alabama Power and Georgia Power may renew the leases, exercise their purchase options, or the property can be sold to a third party. Alabama Power and Georgia Power expect that the fair market value of the leased property would substantially reduce or, for Alabama Power, potentially eliminate the loss under the residual value obligations.
Guarantees
Alabama Power has guaranteed unconditionally the obligation of SEGCO under an installment sale agreement for the purchase of certain pollution control facilities at SEGCO's generating units, pursuant to which $25 million principal amount of pollution control revenue bonds are outstanding and mature in June 2019. Alabama Power also guaranteed a $100 million principal amount long-term bank loan entered into by SEGCO on November 28, 2018. Georgia Power has agreed to reimburse Alabama Power for the portion of such obligations corresponding to Georgia Power's proportionate ownership of SEGCO's stock if Alabama Power is called upon to make such payment under its guarantee. At December 31, 2018, the capitalization of SEGCO consisted of $90 million of equity and $125 million of long-term debt, on which the annual interest requirement is $4 million. In addition, SEGCO had short-term debt outstanding of $5 million. See Note 7 under "SEGCO" for additional information.
In 2013, Georgia Power entered into an agreement that requires Georgia Power to guarantee certain payments of a gas supplier for Plant McIntosh for a period up to 15 years. The agreement was subsequently amended on May 31, 2018. The guarantee is expected to be terminated if certain events occur by October 2019. In the event the gas supplier defaults on payments, the maximum potential exposure under the guarantee and amendment is approximately $30 million.
In October 2017, Atlantic Coast Pipeline executed a $3.4 billion revolving credit facility with a stated maturity date of October 2021. Southern Company Gas entered into a guarantee agreement to support its share of the revolving credit facility. Southern Company Gas' maximum exposure to loss under the terms of the guarantee is limited to 5% of the outstanding borrowings under the credit facility, and totaled $72 million as of December 31, 2018. See Note 2 under "FERC Matters – Southern Company Gas" for additional information regarding the Atlantic Coast Pipeline.
As discussed above under "Operating Leases," Alabama Power and Georgia Power have entered into certain residual value guarantees related to railcar leases.
10. INCOME TAXES
Southern Company files a consolidated federal income tax return and the registrants file various state income tax returns, some of which are combined or unitary. Under a joint consolidated income tax allocation agreement, each Southern Company subsidiary's current and deferred tax expense is computed on a stand-alone basis and no subsidiary is allocated more current expense than would be paid if it filed a separate income tax return. PowerSecure and Southern Company Gas became participants in the income

COMBINED NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)
Southern Company and Subsidiary Companies 2018 Annual Report

tax allocation agreement as of May 9, 2016 and July 1, 2016, respectively. See Note 15 for additional information on these acquisitions, as well as disposition activity during 2018. In accordance with IRS regulations, each company is jointly and severally liable for the federal tax liability. Prior to the Merger, Southern Company Gas filed a U.S. federal consolidated income tax return and various state income tax returns.
Federal Tax Reform Legislation
Following the enactment of the Tax Reform Legislation, the SEC staff issued Staff Accounting Bulletin 118 – "Income Tax Accounting Implications of the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act" (SAB 118), which provided for a measurement period of up to one year from the enactment date to complete accounting under GAAP for the tax effects of the legislation. Due to the complex and comprehensive nature of the enacted tax law changes and their application under GAAP, the registrants considered all amounts recorded in the financial statements as a result of the Tax Reform Legislation "provisional" as discussed in SAB 118 and subject to revision prior to filing the 2017 tax return in the fourth quarter 2018. As of December 31, 2018, each of the registrants considered the measurement of impacts from the Tax Reform Legislation on deferred income tax assets and liabilities, primarily due to the impact of the reduction of the corporate income tax rate, to be complete.
However, the IRS continues to issue regulations that provide further interpretation and guidance on the law and each respective state's adoption of the provisions contained in the Tax Reform Legislation remains uncertain. In addition, the regulatory treatment of certain impacts of the Tax Reform Legislation is subject to the discretion of the FERC and each state regulatory commission. The ultimate impact of these matters cannot be determined at this time. See Note 2 for additional information.
Redeemable Noncontrolling Interests
See Note 10.
8. FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTS
Fair value measurements are based on inputs of observable and unobservable market data that a market participant would use in pricing the asset or liability. The use of observable inputs is maximized where available and the use of unobservable inputs is minimized for fair value measurement and reflects a three-tier fair value hierarchy that prioritizes inputs to valuation techniques used for fair value measurement.
Level 1 consists of observable market data in an active market for identical assets or liabilities.
Level 2 consists of observable market data, other than that included in Level 1, that is either directly or indirectly observable.
Level 3 consists of unobservable market data. The input may reflect the assumptions of the Company of what a market participant would use in pricing an asset or liability. If there is little available market data, then the Company's own assumptions are the best available information.
In the case of multiple inputs being used in a fair value measurement, the lowest level input that is significant to the fair value measurement represents the level in the fair value hierarchy in which the fair value measurement is reported.
As of December 31, 2017, assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis during the period, together with their associated level of the fair value hierarchy, were as follows:
 Fair Value Measurements Using  
 Quoted Prices in Active Markets for Identical Assets Significant Other Observable Inputs Significant Unobservable Inputs  
As of December 31, 2017:(Level 1) (Level 2) (Level 3) Total
 (in millions)
Assets:       
Energy-related derivatives$
 $3
 $
 $3
Foreign currency derivatives
 129
 
 129
Cash equivalents21
 
 
 21
Total$21
 $132
 $
 $153
Liabilities:       
Energy-related derivatives$
 $13
 $
 $13
Foreign currency derivatives
 23
 
 23
Contingent consideration
 
 22
 22
Total$
 $36
 $22
 $58

NOTES (continued)
Southern Power Company and Subsidiary Companies 2017 Annual Report

As of December 31, 2016, assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis during the period, together with their associated level of the fair value hierarchy, were as follows:
 Fair Value Measurements Using  
 Quoted Prices in Active Markets for Identical Assets Significant Other Observable Inputs Significant Unobservable Inputs  
As of December 31, 2016:(Level 1) (Level 2) (Level 3) Total
 (in millions)
Assets:       
Energy-related derivatives$
 $21
 $
 $21
Interest rate derivatives
 1
 
 1
Cash equivalents628
 
 
 628
Total$628
 $22
 $
 $650
Liabilities:       
Energy-related derivatives$
 $5
 $
 $5
Foreign currency derivatives
 58
 
 58
Contingent consideration
 
 18
 18
Total$
 $63
 $18
 $81
Valuation Methodologies
The energy-related derivatives primarily consist of over-the-counter financial products for natural gas and physical power products, including, from time to time, basis swaps. These are standard products used within the energy industry and are valued using the market approach. The inputs used are mainly from observable market sources, such as forward natural gas prices, power prices, implied volatility, and overnight index swap interest rates. Interest rate derivatives are also standard over-the-counter products that are valued using observable market data and assumptions commonly used by market participants. The fair value of interest rate derivatives reflects the net present value of expected payments and receipts under the swap agreement based on the market's expectation of future interest rates. Additional inputs to the net present value calculation may include the contract terms, counterparty credit risk, and occasionally, implied volatility of interest rate options. The fair value of cross-currency swaps reflects the net present value of expected payments and receipts under the swap agreement based on the market's expectation of future foreign currency exchange rates. Additional inputs to the net present value calculation may include the contract terms, counterparty credit risk, and discount rates. The interest rate derivatives and cross-currency swaps are categorized as Level 2 under Fair Value Measurements as these inputs are based on observable data and valuations of similar instruments. See Note 9 for additional information on how these derivatives are used.
The Company has contingent payment obligations related to certain acquisitions whereby the Company is primarily obligated to make generation-based payments to the seller commencing at the commercial operation date through 2026. The obligation is categorized as Level 3 under Fair Value Measurements as the fair value is determined using significant unobservable inputs for the forecasted facility generation in MW-hours, as well as other inputs such as a fixed dollar amount per MW-hour, and a discount rate, and is evaluated periodically. The fair value of contingent consideration reflects the net present value of expected payments and any periodic change arising from forecasted generation is expected to be immaterial.

NOTES (continued)
Southern Power Company and Subsidiary Companies 2017 Annual Report

As of December 31, 2017 and 2016, other financial instruments for which the carrying amount did not equal fair value were as follows:
 
Carrying
Amount
 
Fair
Value
 (in millions)
Long-term debt, including securities due within one year:   
2017$5,841
 $6,079
2016$5,628
 $5,691
The fair values are determined using Level 2 measurements and are based on quoted market prices for the same or similar issues or on the current rates available to the Company.
9. DERIVATIVES
The Company is exposed to market risks, primarily commodity price risk and interest rate risk, and occasionally foreign currency exchange rate risk. To manage the volatility attributable to these exposures, the Company nets its exposures, where possible, to take advantage of natural offsets and enters into various derivative transactions for the remaining exposures pursuant to the Company's policies in areas such as counterparty exposure and risk management practices. The Company's policy is that derivatives are to be used primarily for hedging purposes and mandates strict adherence to all applicable risk management policies. Derivative positions are monitored using techniques including, but not limited to, market valuation, value at risk, stress testing, and sensitivity analysis. Derivative instruments are recognized at fair value in the consolidated balance sheets as either assets or liabilities and are presented on a net basis. See Note 8 for additional fair value information. In the statements of cash flows, the cash impacts of settled energy-related and interest rate derivatives are recorded as operating activities. The cash impacts of settled foreign currency derivatives are classified as operating or financing activities to correspond with classification of the hedged interest or principal, respectively. See Note 1 under "Financial Instruments" for additional information.
Energy-Related Derivatives
The Company enters into energy-related derivatives to hedge exposures to electricity, natural gas, and other fuel price changes. The Company has limited exposure to market volatility in energy-related commodity prices because its long-term sales contracts shift substantially all fuel cost responsibility to the purchaser. However, the Company has been and may continue to be exposed to market volatility in energy-related commodity prices as a result of uncontracted generating capacity.
Energy-related derivative contracts are accounted for under one of two methods:
Cash Flow Hedges – Gains and losses on energy-related derivatives designated as cash flow hedges which are used to hedge anticipated purchases and sales and are initially deferred in OCI before being recognized in the consolidated statements of income in the same period as the hedged transactions are reflected in earnings.
Not Designated – Gains and losses on energy-related derivative contracts that are not designated or fail to qualify as hedges are recognized in the consolidated statements of income as incurred.
Some energy-related derivative contracts require physical delivery as opposed to financial settlement, and this type of derivative is both common and prevalent within the electric industry. When an energy-related derivative contract is settled physically, any cumulative unrealized gain or loss is reversed and the contract price is recognized in the respective line item representing the actual price of the underlying goods being delivered.
At December 31, 2017, the net volume of energy-related derivative contracts for natural gas positions totaled 14 million mmBtu, all of which expire in 2018. At December 31, 2017, the net volume of energy-related derivative contracts for power positions was 3 million MWHs, all of which expire in 2018.
In addition to the volume discussed above, the Company enters into physical natural gas supply contracts that provide the option to sell back excess natural gas due to operational constraints. The maximum expected volume of natural gas subject to such a feature is 10 million mmBtu.
For cash flow hedges, gains (losses) expected to be reclassified from accumulated OCI to earnings for the 12-month period ending December 31, 2018 is $(7) million.

NOTES (continued)
Southern Power Company and Subsidiary Companies 2017 Annual Report

Interest Rate Derivatives
The Company may also enter into interest rate derivatives to hedge exposure to changes in interest rates. Derivatives related to existing variable rate securities or forecasted transactions are accounted for as cash flow hedges where the effective portion of the derivatives' fair value gains or losses is recorded in OCI and is reclassified into earnings at the same time the hedged transactions affect earnings. The derivatives employed as hedging instruments are structured to minimize ineffectiveness, which is recorded directly to earnings. Fair value gains or losses on derivatives that are not designated or fail to qualify as hedges are recognized in the consolidated statements of income as incurred. At December 31, 2017, the Company did not have any interest rate derivatives outstanding and does not have any deferred gains and losses in AOCI related to cash flow hedges that would be reclassified from AOCI to interest expense.
Foreign Currency Derivatives
The Company may also enter into foreign currency derivatives to hedge exposure to changes in foreign currency exchange rates, such as that arising from the issuance of debt denominated in a currency other than U.S. dollars. Derivatives related to forecasted transactions are accounted for as cash flow hedges where the effective portion of the derivatives' fair value gains or losses is recorded in OCI and is reclassified into earnings at the same time that the hedged transactions affect earnings, including foreign currency gains or losses arising from changes in the U.S. currency exchange rates. Any ineffectiveness is recorded directly to earnings. The derivatives employed as hedging instruments are structured to minimize ineffectiveness.
At December 31, 2017, the following foreign currency derivatives were outstanding:
 Pay NotionalPay RateReceive NotionalReceive RateHedge
Maturity Date
Fair Value
Gain (Loss) at December 31, 2017
 (in millions) (in millions)  (in millions)
Cash Flow Hedges of Existing Debt     

$677
2.95%600
1.00%June 2022$55

564
3.78%500
1.85%June 202651
Total$1,241
 1,100
  $106
The estimated pre-tax gains (losses) related to foreign currency derivatives that will be reclassified from accumulated OCI to earnings for the next 12-month period ending December 31, 2018 total $(23) million.
Derivative Financial Statement Presentation and Amounts
The Company enters into energy-related and interest rate derivative contracts that may contain provisions that permit intra-contract netting of derivative receivables and payables for routine billing and offsets related to events of default and settlements. Fair value amounts of derivative assets and liabilities on the consolidated balance sheets are presented net to the extent that there are netting arrangements or similar agreements with counterparties.
At December 31, 2017 and 2016, the fair value of energy-related, interest rate, and foreign currency derivatives reflected in the consolidated balance sheets is as follows:

NOTES (continued)
Southern Power Company and Subsidiary Companies 2017 Annual Report

 2017 2016
Derivative Category and Balance Sheet LocationAssetsLiabilities AssetsLiabilities
 (in millions)
Derivatives designated as hedging instruments in cash flow and fair value hedges     
Energy-related derivatives:     
Other current assets/Other current liabilities$3
$11
 $18
$4
Foreign currency derivatives:     
Other current assets/Other current liabilities
23
 
25
Other deferred charges and assets/Other deferred credits and liabilities129

 
33
Total derivatives designated as hedging instruments in cash flow and fair value hedges$132
$34
 $18
$62
Derivatives not designated as hedging instruments     
Energy-related derivatives:     
Other current assets/Other current liabilities$
$2
 $3
$1
Interest rate derivatives:     
Other current assets/Other current liabilities

 1

Total derivatives not designated as hedging instruments$
$2
 $4
$1
Gross amounts of recognized assets and liabilities$132
$36
 $22
$63
Gross amounts offset$(3)$(3) $(5)$(5)
Net amounts of assets and liabilities$129
$33
 $17
$58

NOTES (continued)
Southern Power Company and Subsidiary Companies 2017 Annual Report

For the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016, and 2015, the pre-tax effects of energy-related, interest rate, and foreign currency derivatives designated as cash flow hedging instruments on the consolidated statements of income were as follows:
Derivatives in Cash Flow Hedging Relationships
Gain (Loss) Recognized in OCI on Derivative
(Effective Portion)
 
Gain (Loss) Reclassified from AOCI into Income
(Effective Portion)
Derivative Category201720162015 Statements of Income Location201720162015
 (in millions)  (in millions)
Energy-related derivatives$(38)$14
$
 Amortization$(17)$2
$
Interest rate derivatives


 Interest expense, net of amounts capitalized
(1)(1)
Foreign currency derivatives140
(58)
 Interest expense, net of amounts capitalized(23)(13)
     Other income (expense), net159
(82)
Total$102
$(44)$
  $119
$(94)$(1)
There was no material ineffectiveness recorded in earnings for any period presented.
The pre-tax effects of energy-related derivatives and interest rate derivatives not designated as hedging instruments on the Company's consolidated statements of income were not material for any year presented.
Contingent Features
The Company does not have any credit arrangements that would require material changes in payment schedules or terminations as a result of a credit rating downgrade. There are certain derivatives that could require collateral, but not accelerated payment, in the event of various credit rating changes of certain affiliated companies. At December 31, 2017, there was no collateral posted with the Company's derivative counterparties.
At December 31, 2017, the fair value of derivative liabilities with contingent features was $8 million. However, the fair value of derivative liabilities with contingent features, including certain agreements that could require collateral in the event that one or more Southern Company system power pool participants has a credit rating change to below investment grade because of joint and several liability features underlying these derivatives, was $12 million at December 31, 2017.
Generally, collateral may be provided by a Southern Company guaranty, letter of credit, or cash. If collateral is required, fair value amounts recognized for the right to reclaim cash collateral or the obligation to return cash collateral are not offset against fair value amounts recognized for derivatives executed with the same counterparty.
The Company maintains accounts with certain regional transmission organizations to facilitate financial derivative transactions. Based on the value of the positions in these accounts and the associated margin requirements, the Company may be required to post collateral. At December 31, 2017, cash collateral posted was immaterial.
The Company is exposed to losses related to financial instruments in the event of counterparties' nonperformance. The Company only enters into agreements and material transactions with counterparties that have investment grade credit ratings by Moody's and S&P or with counterparties who have posted collateral to cover potential credit exposure. The Company has also established risk management policies and controls to determine and monitor the creditworthiness of counterparties in order to mitigate the Company's exposure to counterparty credit risk. Therefore, the Company does not anticipate a material adverse effect on the financial statements as a result of counterparty nonperformance.
10. NONCONTROLLING INTERESTS
In April 2017, Southern Power reclassified approximately $114 million was reclassified from redeemable noncontrolling interests to non-redeemable noncontrolling interests due to the expiration of an option allowing SunPower Corporation to require the CompanySouthern Power to purchase its redeemable noncontrolling interest at fair market value. In addition, in October 2017, Turner Renewable Energy, LLC owned aredeemed at fair value its 10% interest of redeemable noncontrolling interest in certain of the Company'sSouthern Power's solar facilities. These noncontrolling interests were redeemed in October 2017 at fair market value pursuant to the partnership agreement. As ofAt December 31, 2018 and 2017, there were no outstanding redeemable noncontrolling interests.

NOTES (continued)
Southern Power Company and Subsidiary Companies 2017 Annual Report

The following table presents the changes in Southern Power's redeemable noncontrolling interests for the years ended December 31:31, 2017 and 2016:
2017 2016 20152017 2016
  (in millions)  (in millions)
Beginning balance$164
 $43
 $39
$164
 $43
Net income attributable to redeemable noncontrolling interests2
 4
 2
2
 4
Distributions to redeemable noncontrolling interests(2) (1) 
(2) (1)
Capital contributions from redeemable noncontrolling interests2
 118
 2
2
 118
Redemption of redeemable noncontrolling interests(59) 
 
(59) 
Reclassification to non-redeemable noncontrolling interests(114) 
 
(114) 
Change in fair value of redeemable noncontrolling interests7
 
 
7
 
Ending balance$
 $164
 $43
$
 $164
The following table presents the attribution of net income to the CompanySouthern Power and the noncontrolling interests for the years ended December 31:31, 2017 and 2016:
2017 2016 20152017 2016
(in millions)(in millions)
Net income$1,117
 $374
 $229
$1,117
 $374
Less: Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests44
 32
 12
44
 32
Less: Net income attributable to redeemable noncontrolling interests2
 4
 2
2
 4
Net income attributable to the Company$1,071
 $338
 $215
Net income attributable to Southern Power$1,071
 $338
11. ACQUISITIONS
During 2017 and 2016, in accordance with its overall growth strategy, the Company or one of its wholly-owned subsidiaries, acquired or contracted to acquire the projects discussed below. Also, in March 2016, the Company acquired an additional 15% interest in Desert Stateline, 51% of which was initially acquired in 2015. As a result, the Company and the class B member are now entitled to 66% and 34%, respectively, of all cash distributions from Desert Stateline. In addition, the Company will continue to be entitled to substantially all of the federal tax benefits with respect to the transaction. Acquisition-related costs were expensed as incurred and were not material for any of the years presented.
The following table presents the Company's acquisition activity for the year ended, and subsequent to, December 31, 2017.
Project FacilityResourceSeller, Acquisition Date
Approximate Nameplate Capacity (MW)
 LocationOwnership PercentageActual / Expected CODPPA Contract Period
Business Acquisitions During the Year Ended December 31, 2017
BethelWindInvenergy Wind Global LLC,
January 6, 2017
276 Castro County, TX100% January 201712 years
Cactus Flats(a)
WindRES America Developments, Inc.,
July 31, 2017
148 Concho County, TX100% Third quarter 201812 years and 15 years
Asset Acquisitions Subsequent to December 31, 2017
Gaskell West 1SolarRecurrent Energy Development Holdings, LLC,
January 26, 2018
20 Kern County, CA100% of Class B
(b) 
March
2018
20 years
(a)On July 31, 2017, the Company purchased 100% of the Cactus Flats facility and commenced construction. Upon placing the facility in service, the Company expects to close on a tax equity partnership agreement that has already been executed, subject to various customary conditions at closing, and will then own 100% of the class B membership interests.
(b)The Company owns 100% of the class B membership interest under a tax equity partnership agreement.

NOTES (continued)
Southern Power Company and Subsidiary Companies 2017 Annual Report

Business Acquisitions During the Year Ended December 31, 2017
The Company's aggregate purchase price for acquisitions during the year ended December 31, 2017 was $539 million. The fair values of the assets acquired and liabilities assumed were finalized in 2017 and recorded as follows:
 2017
 (in millions)
Restricted cash$16
CWIP534
Other assets5
Accounts payable(16)
Total purchase price$539
In 2017, total revenues of $15 million and net income of $17 million, primarily as a result of PTCs, was recognized in the consolidated statements of income by the Company related to the 2017 acquisitions. The Bethel facility did not have operating revenues or activities prior to completion of construction and being placed in service, and the Cactus Flats facility is still under construction. Therefore, supplemental pro forma information as though the acquisitions occurred as of the beginning of 2017 and for the comparable 2016 period is not meaningful and has been omitted.
Construction Projects in Progress
During the year ended December 31, 2017, in accordance with its overall growth strategy, the Company continued construction on the 345-MW Mankato expansion project and commenced construction on the Cactus Flats facility. Total aggregate construction costs for these facilities, excluding acquisition costs and including construction costs to complete the subsequently-acquired Gaskell West 1 solar project, are expected to be between $385 million and $430 million. At December 31, 2017, construction costs included in CWIP related to these projects totaled $188 million. The ultimate outcome of these matters cannot be determined at this time.
Development Projects
During 2017, as part of the Company's renewable development strategy, the Company purchased wind turbine equipment from Siemens Wind Power, Inc. and Vestas-American Wind Technology, Inc. to be used for various development and construction projects, up to 900 MWs in total. Once these wind projects reach commercial operations, which is expected in 2021, they are expected to qualify for 80% PTCs.
During 2016, the Company entered into a joint development agreement with Renewable Energy Systems Americas, Inc. to develop and construct approximately 3,000 MWs of wind projects expected to be placed in service between 2018 and 2020. In addition, in 2016, the Company purchased wind turbine equipment from Siemens Wind Power, Inc. and Vestas-American Wind Technology, Inc. to be used for construction of the facilities. Once these wind projects reach commercial operations, they are expected to qualify for 100% PTCs.
The ultimate outcome of these matters cannot be determined at this time.

NOTES (continued)
Southern Power Company and Subsidiary Companies 2017 Annual Report

The following table presents the Company's acquisitions for the year ended December 31, 2016.
Project FacilityResourceSeller, Acquisition Date
Approximate
Nameplate Capacity (
MW)
 LocationOwnership PercentageActual CODPPA
Contract Period
Acquisitions for the Year Ended December 31, 2016
Boulder 1SolarSunPower Corporation,
November 16, 2016
100 Clark County, NV51%(a)December 201620 years
CalipatriaSolarSolar Frontier Americas Holding LLC,
February 11, 2016
20 Imperial County, CA100%(b)February 201620 years
East PecosSolarFirst Solar, Inc.,
March 4, 2016
120 Pecos County, TX100% March 201715 years
Grant PlainsWindApex Clean Energy Holdings, LLC,
August 26, 2016
147 Grant County, OK100% December 2016
20 years and 12 years (c)
Grant WindWindApex Clean Energy Holdings, LLC,
April 7, 2016
151 Grant County, OK100% April 201620 years
HenriettaSolarSunPower Corporation,
July 1, 2016
102 Kings County, CA51%(a)July 201620 years
LamesaSolarRES America Developments Inc.,
July 1, 2016
102 Dawson County, TX100% April 201715 years
Mankato (d)
Natural GasCalpine Corporation,
October 26, 2016
375 Mankato, MN100% 
N/A (e)
10 years
PassadumkeagWindQuantum Utility Generation, LLC,
June 30, 2016
42 Penobscot County, ME100% July 201615 years
RutherfordSolarCypress Creek Renewables, LLC,
July 1, 2016
74 Rutherford County, NC100%(b)December 201615 years
Salt ForkWindEDF Renewable Energy, Inc.,
December 1, 2016
174 Donley and Gray Counties, TX100% December 201614 years and 12 years
Tyler BluffWindEDF Renewable Energy, Inc.,
December 21, 2016
125 Cooke County, TX100% December 201612 years
Wake WindWindInvenergy Wind Global LLC,
October 26, 2016
257 Floyd and Crosby Counties, TX90.1%(f)October 201612 years
(a)The Company owns 100% of the class A membership interests and a wholly-owned subsidiary of the seller owns 100% of the class B membership interests. The Company and the class B member are entitled to 51% and 49%, respectively, of all cash distributions from the project. In addition, the Company is entitled to substantially all of the federal tax benefits with respect to the transaction.
(b)The Company originally purchased 90%, with a minority owner owning 10%. During 2017, the Company acquired the remaining 10% ownership interest. See Note 10 for additional information.
(c)In addition to the 20-year and 12-year PPAs, the facility has a 10-year contract with Allianz Risk Transfer (Bermuda) Ltd.
(d)Under the terms of the PPA and the expansion PPA, approximately $442 million of assets, primarily related to property, plant, and equipment, are subject to lien at December 31, 2017.
(e)The acquisition included a fully operational 375-MW natural gas-fired combined-cycle facility.
(f)The Company owns 90.1%, with the minority owner, Invenergy Wind Global LLC, owning 9.9%.

NOTES (continued)
Southern Power Company and Subsidiary Companies 2017 Annual Report

Acquisitions During the Year Ended December 31, 2016
The Company's aggregate purchase price for acquisitions during the year ended December 31, 2016 was approximately $2.3 billion. The total aggregate purchase price including minority ownership contributions and the assumption of non-recourse construction debt to the Company was approximately $2.6 billion for these acquisitions. In connection with the Company's 2016 acquisitions, allocations of the purchase price to individual assets were finalized during the year ended December 31, 2017 with no changes to amounts originally reported for Boulder 1, Grant Plains, Grant Wind, Henrietta, Mankato, Passadumkeag, Salt Fork, Tyler Bluff, and Wake Wind. The fair values of the assets and liabilities acquired through the business combinations were recorded as follows:
 2016
 (in millions)
CWIP$2,354
Property, plant, and equipment302
Intangible assets (a)
128
Other assets52
Accounts payable(16)
Debt(217)
Total purchase price$2,603
  
Funded by: 
The Company (b) (c)
$2,345
Noncontrolling interests (d) (e)
258
Total purchase price$2,603
(a)Intangible assets consist of acquired PPAs that will be amortized over 10- and 20-year terms. The estimated amortization for future periods is approximately $9 million per year. See Note 1 for additional information.
(b)At December 31, 2016, $461 million is included in acquisitions payable on the consolidated balance sheets.
(c)Includes approximately $281 million of contingent consideration, of which $29 million was payable at December 31, 2017.
(d)Includes approximately $51 million of non-cash contributions recorded as capital contributions from noncontrolling interests in the consolidated statements of stockholders' equity.
(e)Includes approximately $142 million of contingent consideration, all of which had been paid at December 31, 2016 by the noncontrolling interests.

NOTES (continued)
Southern Power Company and Subsidiary Companies 2017 Annual Report

12. QUARTERLY FINANCIAL INFORMATION (UNAUDITED)
Summarized quarterly financial information for 2017 and 2016 is as follows:
Quarter Ended
Operating
Revenues
 
Operating
Income
 Income Tax (Benefit) 
Net Income
Attributable to
the Company
 (in millions)
March 2017$450
 $65
 $(52) $70
June 2017529
 112
 (38) 82
September 2017618
 159
 (39) 124
December 2017 (*)
478
 32
 (810) 795
        
March 2016$315
 $47
 $(23) $50
June 2016373
 81
 (41) 89
September 2016500
 134
 (102) 176
December 2016389
 28
 (29) 23
(*)As a result of the Tax Reform Legislation, the Company recorded an income tax benefit of $743 million in the fourth quarter 2017. See Note 5 for additional information.
The Company's business is influenced by seasonal weather conditions.

SELECTED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL AND OPERATING DATA 2013-2017
Southern Power Company and Subsidiary Companies 2017 Annual Report
 2017
 2016
 2015
 2014
 2013
Operating Revenues (in millions):         
Wholesale — non-affiliates$1,671
 $1,146
 $964
 $1,116
 $923
Wholesale — affiliates392
 419
 417
 383
 346
Total revenues from sales of electricity2,063
 1,565
 1,381
 1,499
 1,269
Other revenues12
 12
 9
 2
 6
Total$2,075
 $1,577
 $1,390
 $1,501
 $1,275
Net Income Attributable to
   Southern Power (in millions)(a)
$1,071
 $338
 $215
 $172
 $166
Cash Dividends
   on Common Stock (in millions)
$317
 $272
 $131
 $131
 $129
Return on Average Common Equity (percent)(a)
22.39
 9.79
 10.16
 10.39
 10.73
Total Assets (in millions)(b)(c)
$15,206
 $15,169
 $8,905
 $5,233
 $4,417
Property, Plant, and Equipment
   In Service (in millions)
$13,755
 $12,728
 $7,275
 $5,657
 $4,696
Capitalization (in millions):         
Common stock equity$5,138
 $4,430
 $2,483
 $1,752
 $1,564
Redeemable noncontrolling interests
 164
 43
 39
 29
Noncontrolling interests1,360
 1,245
 781
 219
 
Long-term debt(b)
5,071
 5,068
 2,719
 1,085
 1,607
Total (excluding amounts due within one year)$11,569
 $10,907
 $6,026
 $3,095
 $3,200
Capitalization Ratios (percent):         
Common stock equity44.4
 40.6
 41.2
 56.6
 48.9
Redeemable noncontrolling interests
 1.5
 0.7
 1.3
 0.9
Noncontrolling interests11.8
 11.4
 13.0
 7.1
 
Long-term debt(b)
43.8
 46.5
 45.1
 35.0
 50.2
Total (excluding amounts due within one year)100.0
 100.0
 100.0
 100.0
 100.0
Kilowatt-Hour Sales (in millions):         
Wholesale — non-affiliates35,920
 23,213
 18,544
 19,014
 15,111
Wholesale — affiliates12,811
 15,950
 16,567
 11,194
 9,359
Total48,731
 39,163
 35,111
 30,208
 24,470
Plant Nameplate Capacity
   Ratings (year-end) (megawatts)
12,940
 12,442
 9,808
 9,185
 8,924
Maximum Peak-Hour Demand (megawatts):         
Winter3,421
 3,469
 3,923
 3,999
 2,685
Summer4,224
 4,303
 4,249
 3,998
 3,271
Annual Load Factor (percent)49.1
 50.0
 49.0
 51.8
 54.2
Plant Availability (percent)99.9
 91.6
 93.1
 91.8
 91.8
Source of Energy Supply (percent):         
Natural gas67.7
 79.4
 89.5
 86.0
 88.5
Solar, Wind, and Biomass22.8
 12.1
 4.3
 2.9
 1.1
Purchased power —         
From non-affiliates7.8
 6.8
 4.7
 6.4
 6.4
From affiliates1.7
 1.7
 1.5
 4.7
 4.0
Total100.0
 100.0
 100.0
 100.0
 100.0
Employees (year-end)(d)
541
 
 
 
 
(a)As a result of the Tax Reform Legislation, the Company recorded an income tax benefit of $743 million in 2017.
(b)A reclassification of debt issuance costs from Total Assets to Long-term debt of $11 million and $12 million is reflected for years 2014 and 2013, respectively, in accordance with new accounting standards adopted in 2015 and applied retrospectively.
(c)A reclassification of deferred tax assets from Total Assets of $306 million and $- million is reflected for years 2014 and 2013, respectively, in accordance with new accounting standards adopted in 2015 and applied retrospectively.
(d)Prior to the employee transfer in December 2017, the Company had no employees, but was billed employee related costs from SCS.

SOUTHERN COMPANY GAS
FINANCIAL SECTION


MANAGEMENT'S REPORT ON INTERNAL CONTROL OVER FINANCIAL REPORTING
Southern Company Gas and Subsidiary Companies 2017 Annual Report
The management of Southern Company Gas (the Company) is responsible for establishing and maintaining an adequate system of internal control over financial reporting as required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and as defined in Exchange Act Rule 13a-15(f). A control system can provide only reasonable, not absolute, assurance that the objectives of the control system are met.
Under management's supervision, an evaluation of the design and effectiveness of the Company's internal control over financial reporting was conducted based on the framework in Internal Control—Integrated Framework (2013) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission. Based on this evaluation, management concluded that the Company's internal control over financial reporting was effective as of December 31, 2017.

/s/ Andrew W. Evans
Andrew W. Evans
Chairman, President, and Chief Executive Officer

/s/ Elizabeth W. Reese
Elizabeth W. Reese
Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer, and Treasurer
February 20, 2018

REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
To the stockholder and the Board of Directors of Southern Company Gas and Subsidiary Companies
Opinion on the Financial Statements
We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets and consolidated statements of capitalization of Southern Company Gas and Subsidiary Companies (the Company) (a wholly-owned subsidiary of The Southern Company) as of December 31, 2017 and 2016, the related consolidated statements of income, comprehensive income, stockholders' equity, and cash flows for the year ended December 31, 2017 and the six month periods ended June 30, 2016 (Predecessor) and December 31, 2016 (Successor), and the related notes (collectively referred to as the "financial statements"). In our opinion, the financial statements (pages II-593 to II-651) present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of the Company as of December 31, 2017 and 2016, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for the year ended December 31, 2017 and the six months ended June 30, 2016 (Predecessor) and December 31, 2016 (Successor), in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.
Basis for Opinion
These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Company's financial statements based on our audits. We did not audit the financial statements of Southern Natural Gas Company, L.L.C. (SNG), the Company's investment in which is accounted for by the use of the equity method. The accompanying consolidated financial statements of the Company include its equity investment in SNG of $1,262 million and $1,394 million as of December 31, 2017 and December 31, 2016, respectively, and its earnings from its equity method investment in SNG of $88 million and $56 million for the year ended December 31, 2017 and the six months ended December 31, 2016, respectively. Those statements were audited by other auditors whose report (which expresses an unqualified opinion on SNG's financial statements and contains an emphasis of matter paragraph concerning the extent of its operations and relationships with affiliated entities) have been furnished to us, and our opinion, insofar as it relates to the amounts included for SNG, is based solely on the report of the other auditors. We are a public accounting firm registered with the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (PCAOB) and are required to be independent with respect to the Company in accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.
We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement, whether due to error or fraud. The Company is not required to have, nor were we engaged to perform, an audit of its internal control over financial reporting. As part of our audits, we are required to obtain an understanding of internal control over financial reporting but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Company's internal control over financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion.
Our audits included performing procedures to assess the risks of material misstatement of the financial statements, whether due to error or fraud, and performing procedures that respond to those risks. Such procedures included examining, on a test basis, evidence regarding the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. Our audits also included evaluating the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the financial statements. We believe that our audits and the report of the other auditors provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
/s/ Deloitte & Touche LLP
Atlanta, Georgia
February 20, 2018
We have served as the Company's auditor since 2016.

REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
To the stockholder and the Board of Directors of Southern Company Gas and Subsidiary Companies
In our opinion, the consolidated statement of income, comprehensive income, common stockholders' equity, and cash flows present fairly, in all material respects, the results of operations and cash flows of Southern Company Gas (formerly AGL Resources Inc.) and its subsidiaries for the year ended December 31, 2015, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. In addition, in our opinion, the financial statement schedule for the year ended December 31, 2015 presents fairly, in all material respects, the information set forth therein when read in conjunction with the related consolidated financial statements. These financial statements and financial statement schedule are the responsibility of the Company's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements and the financial statement schedule based on our audit. We conducted our audit of these financial statements in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements, assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, and evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.


/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
Atlanta, Georgia
February 11, 2016

DEFINITIONS
TermMeaning
AFUDCAllowance for funds used during construction
ASCAccounting Standards Codification
ASUAccounting Standards Update
Atlanta Gas LightAtlanta Gas Light Company, a wholly-owned subsidiary of Southern Company Gas
Atlantic Coast PipelineAtlantic Coast Pipeline, LLC
Chattanooga GasChattanooga Gas Company
Chicago HubA venture of Nicor Gas, which provides natural gas storage and transmission-related services to marketers and gas distribution companies
CUBCitizens Utility Board, in Illinois
Dalton PipelineA 50% undivided ownership interest in a pipeline facility in Georgia
EBITEarnings before interest and taxes
EPAU.S. Environmental Protection Agency
FASBFinancial Accounting Standards Board
FERCFederal Energy Regulatory Commission
FitchFitch Ratings, Inc.
GAAPU.S. generally accepted accounting principles
Heating Degree DaysA measure of weather, calculated when the average daily temperatures are less than 65 degrees Fahrenheit
Heating SeasonThe period from November through March when natural gas usage and operating revenues are generally higher
Horizon PipelineHorizon Pipeline Company, LLC
Illinois CommissionIllinois Commerce Commission
IRSInternal Revenue Service
ITCInvestment tax credit
LIBORLondon Interbank Offered Rate
LIFOLast-in, first-out
LNGLiquefied natural gas
LOCOMLower of weighted average cost or current market price
MarketersMarketers selling retail natural gas in Georgia and certificated by the Georgia PSC
MergerThe merger of a wholly-owned, direct subsidiary of Southern Company, with and into Southern Company Gas, effective July 1, 2016, with Southern Company Gas continuing as the surviving corporation and a wholly-owned, direct subsidiary of Southern Company
MGPManufactured gas plant
mmBtuMillion British thermal units
Moody'sMoody's Investors Service, Inc.
natural gas distribution utilitiesSouthern Company Gas' seven natural gas distribution utilities (Nicor Gas, Atlanta Gas Light, Virginia Natural Gas, Elizabethtown Gas, Florida City Gas, Chattanooga Gas, and Elkton Gas)
New Jersey BPUNew Jersey Board of Public Utilities
Nicor GasNorthern Illinois Gas Company, doing business as Nicor Gas Company
NYMEXNew York Mercantile Exchange, Inc.
OCIOther comprehensive income

DEFINITIONS
(continued)
TermMeaning
PennEast PipelinePennEast Pipeline Company, LLC
PiedmontPiedmont Natural Gas Company, Inc.
Pivotal Utility Holdings
Pivotal Utility Holdings, Inc., a wholly-owned subsidiary of Southern Company Gas,
doing business as Elizabethtown Gas, Elkton Gas, and Florida City Gas
PRPPipeline Replacement Program, Atlanta Gas Light's 15-year infrastructure replacement program, which ended in December 2013
PSCPublic Service Commission
ROEReturn on equity
S&PS&P Global Ratings, a division of S&P Global Inc.
SCSSouthern Company Services, Inc. (the Southern Company system service company)
SECU.S. Securities and Exchange Commission
SequentSequent Energy Management, L.P.
SNGSouthern Natural Gas Company, L.L.C.
Southern CompanyThe Southern Company
Southern Company Gas CapitalSouthern Company Gas Capital Corporation, a 100%-owned subsidiary of Southern Company Gas
Southern Company systemSouthern Company, the traditional electric operating companies, Southern Power, Southern Company Gas (as of July 1, 2016), Southern Electric Generating Company, Southern Nuclear, SCS, Southern Linc, PowerSecure, Inc. (as of May 9, 2016), and other subsidiaries
Southern HoldingsSouthern Company Holdings, Inc.
Southern LincSouthern Communications Services, Inc.
Southern NuclearSouthern Nuclear Operating Company, Inc.
Southern PowerSouthern Power Company and its subsidiaries
SouthStarSouthStar Energy Services, LLC
STRIDEAtlanta Gas Light's Strategic Infrastructure Development and Enhancement program
traditional electric operating companiesAlabama Power Company, Georgia Power Company, Gulf Power Company, and Mississippi Power Company
Tax Reform LegislationThe Tax Cuts and Jobs Act, which was signed into law on December 22, 2017 and became effective on January 1, 2018
TritonTriton Container Investments, LLC
VIEVariable interest entity
Virginia CommissionVirginia State Corporation Commission
Virginia Natural GasVirginia Natural Gas, Inc.
WACOGWeighted average cost of gas

MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
Southern Company Gas and Subsidiary Companies 2017 Annual Report
OVERVIEW
Business Activities
Southern Company Gas is an energy services holding company whose primary business is the distribution of natural gas through utilities in seven states – Illinois, Georgia, Virginia, New Jersey, Florida, Tennessee, and Maryland. Southern Company Gas and its subsidiaries (the Company) are also involved in several other complementary businesses.
The Company has four reportable segments – gas distribution operations, gas marketing services, wholesale gas services, and gas midstream operations – and one non-reportable segment, all other. See Note 12 to the financial statements for additional information.
Many factors affect the opportunities, challenges, and risks of the Company's business. These factors include the ability to maintain safety, to maintain constructive regulatory environments, to maintain and grow natural gas sales and number of customers, and to effectively manage and secure timely recovery of costs. These costs include those related to projected long-term demand growth, environmental standards, reliability, natural gas, and capital expenditures, including updating and expanding the natural gas distribution systems. The natural gas distribution utilities have various regulatory mechanisms that operate to address cost recovery. Effectively operating pursuant to these regulatory mechanisms and appropriately balancing required costs and capital expenditures with customer prices will continue to challenge the Company for the foreseeable future.
Merger, Acquisition, and Disposition Activities
On July 1, 2016, the Company completed the Merger, pursuant to which the Company became a wholly-owned subsidiary of Southern Company. Southern Company accounted for the Merger using the acquisition method of accounting whereby the assets acquired and liabilities assumed were recognized at fair value as of the acquisition date. Pushdown accounting was applied to create a new cost basis for the Company's assets, liabilities, and equity as of the acquisition date. Accordingly, the successor financial statements reflect the new basis of accounting, and successor and predecessor period financial results (separated by a heavy black line) are presented, but are not comparable. As a result of the application of acquisition accounting, certain discussions herein include disclosure of the predecessor and successor periods. See Note 11 to the financial statements under "Merger with Southern Company" for additional information.
In September 2016, the Company paid approximately $1.4 billion to acquire a 50% equity interest in SNG, which is the owner of a 7,000-mile pipeline system connecting natural gas supply basins in Texas, Louisiana, Mississippi, and Alabama to markets in Louisiana, Mississippi, Alabama, Florida, Georgia, South Carolina, and Tennessee. The investment in SNG is accounted for using the equity method. On March 31, 2017, the Company made an additional $50 million contribution to maintain its 50% equity interest in SNG. See Note 4 to the financial statements under "Equity Method Investments – SNG" and Note 11 to the financial statements under "Investment in SNG" for additional information.
In October 2016, the Company completed its purchase of Piedmont's 15% interest in SouthStar for $160 million. See Note 4 to the financial statements under "Variable Interest Entities" for additional information.
On October 15, 2017, the Company's subsidiary, Pivotal Utility Holdings, entered into agreements for the sale of the assets of two of its natural gas distribution utilities, Elizabethtown Gas and Elkton Gas, to South Jersey Industries, Inc. for a total cash purchase price of $1.7 billion. As of December 31, 2017, the net book value of the assets to be disposed of in the sale was approximately $1.3 billion, which includes approximately $0.5 billion of goodwill. The goodwill is not deductible for tax purposes and, as a result, a deferred tax liability has not yet been provided. Through the completion of the asset sales, the Company intends to invest less than $0.1 billion in capital additions required for ordinary business operations of these assets. The completion of each asset sale is subject to the satisfaction or waiver of certain conditions, including, among other customary closing conditions, the receipt of required regulatory approvals, including the FERC, the Federal Communications Commission, the New Jersey BPU, and, with respect to the sale of Elkton Gas, the Maryland PSC. The Company and South Jersey Industries, Inc. made joint filings on December 22, 2017 and January 16, 2018 with the New Jersey BPU and the Maryland PSC, respectively, requesting regulatory approval. The asset sales are expected to be completed by the end of the third quarter 2018.
The ultimate outcome of these matters cannot be determined at this time.
Operating Metrics
The Company continues to focus on several operating metrics, including Heating Degree Days, customer count, and volumes of natural gas sold.

MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS (continued)
Southern Company Gas and Subsidiary Companies 2017 Annual Report


The Company measures weather and the effect on its business using Heating Degree Days. Generally, increased Heating Degree Days result in higher demand for natural gas on the Company's distribution system. With the exception of the Company's utilities in Illinois and Florida, the Company has various regulatory mechanisms, such as weather normalization and straight-fixed-variable rate design, which limit its exposure to weather changes within typical ranges in each of its utilities' respective service territory. However, the utility customers in Illinois and the gas marketing services customers primarily in Georgia, Illinois, and Ohio can be impacted by warmer- or colder-than-normal weather. The Company utilizes weather hedges to reduce negative earnings impact in the event of warmer-than-normal weather, while retaining most of the earnings upside for these businesses.
The number of customers served by gas distribution operations and gas marketing services can be impacted by natural gas prices, economic conditions, and competition from alternative fuels. Gas marketing services' customers are primarily located in Georgia, Illinois, and Ohio.
The Company's natural gas volume metrics for gas distribution operations and gas marketing services illustrate the effects of weather and customer demand for natural gas. Wholesale gas services' physical sales volumes represent the daily average natural gas volumes sold to its customers.
See RESULTS OF OPERATIONS herein for additional information on these operating metrics.
Seasonality of Results
During the Heating Season, natural gas usage and operating revenues are generally higher as more customers are connected to the gas distribution systems and natural gas usage is higher in periods of colder weather. Occasionally in the summer, wholesale gas services' operating revenues are impacted due to peak usage by power generators in response to summer energy demands. The Company's base operating expenses, excluding cost of natural gas, bad debt expense, and certain incentive compensation costs, are incurred relatively evenly throughout the year. Seasonality also affects the comparison of certain balance sheet items across quarters, including receivables, unbilled revenues, natural gas for sale, and notes payable. However, these items are comparable when reviewing the Company's annual results. Thus, the Company's operating results can vary significantly from quarter to quarter as a result of seasonality, which is illustrated in the table below.
  Percent Generated During Heating Season
  Operating Revenues EBIT Net Income
Successor - 2017 67.3% 69.6% 73.7%
Successor - July 1, 2016 through December 31, 2016 67.1% 81.5% 96.5%
Predecessor - January 1, 2016 through June 30, 2016 70.0% 107.0% 138.9%
Predecessor - 2015 68.1% 77.3% 85.0%
Earnings
Net income attributable to the Company for the successor year ended December 31, 2017 was $243 million, which included net income of $53 million from the Company's investment in SNG (including $18 million related to a non-cash charge recorded by SNG to establish a regulatory liability associated with the Tax Reform Legislation) and $44 million generated from the Company's continued investment in infrastructure replacement programs and base rate increases at Atlanta Gas Light, Elizabethtown Gas, and Virginia Natural Gas, less the associated increases in depreciation. Net income also reflects $130 million of additional tax expense resulting from the revaluation of deferred tax assets of $93 million related to the Tax Reform Legislation and $37 million associated with State of Illinois income tax legislation enacted in the third quarter 2017 and new income tax apportionment factors in several states resulting from the Company's inclusion in the consolidated Southern Company state tax filings. Also included in net income was $17 million of additional expense resulting from the pushdown of acquisition accounting. See FUTURE EARNINGS POTENTIAL – "Income Tax Matters" herein and Notes 5 and 11 to the financial statements for additional information.
Net income attributable to the Company for the successor period of July 1, 2016 through December 31, 2016 was $114 million, which included $26 million in earnings from the SNG investment, net of related interest expense, partially offset by $12 million of additional expense resulting from the impact of the pushdown of acquisition accounting and $27 million of Merger-related expenses.
Net income attributable to the Company for the predecessor periods of January 1, 2016 through June 30, 2016 and the year ended December 31, 2015 were $131 million and $353 million, respectively, which included $41 million and $26 million, respectively, of Merger-related expenses, and $14 million and $20 million, respectively, of net income attributable to the SouthStar

MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS (continued)
Southern Company Gas and Subsidiary Companies 2017 Annual Report


noncontrolling interest, which the Company purchased in October 2016. Net income for the predecessor periods reflected higher revenues from continued investment in infrastructure programs, partially offset by warm weather, net of hedging, and low earnings from wholesale gas services due to mark-to-market losses.
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
Operating Results
A condensed income statement for the Company follows:
 Successor  Predecessor
 Year Ended December 31, July 1, 2016 through December 31,  January 1, 2016 through June 30, Year Ended December 31,
 2017 2016  2016 2015
 (in millions)  (in millions)
Operating revenues$3,920
 $1,652
  $1,905
 $3,941
Cost of natural gas and other sales1,630
 623
  769
 1,645
Other operations and maintenance940
 482
  454
 928
Depreciation and amortization501
 238
  206
 397
Taxes other than income taxes184
 71
  99
 181
Merger-related expenses
 41
  56
 44
Total operating expenses3,255
 1,455
  1,584
 3,195
Operating income665
 197
  321
 746
Earnings from equity method investments106
 60
  2
 6
Interest expense, net of amounts capitalized200
 81
  96
 175
Other income (expense), net39
 14
  5
 9
Earnings before income taxes610
 190
  232
 586
Income taxes367
 76
  87
 213
Net Income243
 114
  145
 373
Less: Net income attributable to noncontrolling interest
 
  14
 20
Net Income Attributable to Southern Company Gas$243
 $114
  $131
 $353
Operating Revenues
Operating revenues for the successor year ended December 31, 2017 and the successor period of July 1, 2016 through December 31, 2016 were $3.9 billion and $1.7 billion, respectively. For the predecessor periods of January 1, 2016 through June 30, 2016 and the year ended December 31, 2015, operating revenues were $1.9 billion and $3.9 billion, respectively.
For the successor year ended December 31, 2017, natural gas revenues included recovery of $1.6 billion in cost of natural gas and $6 million in net revenues from wholesale gas services, net of $21 million of amortization associated with assets established in the application of acquisition accounting. Also included in natural gas revenues for the successor year ended December 31, 2017 were $99 million in additional revenues generated from gas distribution operations as a result of continued investment in infrastructure replacement programs and increases in base rate revenues at Atlanta Gas Light, Elizabethtown Gas, and Virginia Natural Gas. Natural gas revenues were partially offset by a $13 million negative impact of warmer-than-normal weather, net of hedging.
For the successor period of July 1, 2016 through December 31, 2016, natural gas revenues included recovery of $613 million in cost of natural gas and $24 million in net revenues from wholesale gas services, net of $5 million of amortization associated with assets established in the application of acquisition accounting. Natural gas revenues were partially offset by a $5 million decrease attributable to warmer-than-normal weather, net of hedging.
For the predecessor periods of January 1, 2016 through June 30, 2016 and the year ended December 31, 2015, natural gas revenues included recovery of $755 million and $1.6 billion, respectively, in cost of natural gas, as well as $32 million in net losses and $202 million in net revenues, respectively, from wholesale gas services. For the predecessor period of January 1, 2016 through June 30, 2016, natural gas revenues included a negative impact of $7 million attributable to warmer-than-normal weather,

MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS (continued)
Southern Company Gas and Subsidiary Companies 2017 Annual Report


net of hedging. For the predecessor year ended December 31, 2015, natural gas revenues included a positive impact of $2 million also attributable to warmer-than-normal weather, net of hedging.
See "Segment Information" herein for additional information on wholesale gas services' revenues and losses.
Natural gas distribution rates include provisions to adjust billings for fluctuations in natural gas costs. Therefore, gas costs recovered through natural gas revenues generally equal the amount expensed in cost of natural gas and do not affect net income from gas distribution operations. See "Cost of Natural Gas" herein for additional information. Revenue impacts from weather and customer growth are described further below.
During Heating Season, natural gas usage and operating revenues are generally higher. Weather typically does not have a significant net income impact during the non-Heating Season. The following table presents the Heating Degree Days information for Illinois and Georgia, the primary locations where the Company's operations are impacted by weather.
  Years Ended December 31, 2017 vs. normal 2017 vs. 2016 2016 vs. 2015
  
Normal(a)
 2017 2016 2015 (warmer) colder (warmer) (warmer)
  (in thousands)      
Illinois(b)
 5,869
 5,246
 5,243
 5,433
 (10.6)% 0.1 % (3.5)%
Georgia 2,614
 1,970
 2,175
 2,204
 (24.6)% (9.4)% (1.3)%
(a)Normal represents the 10-year average from January 1, 2007 through December 31, 2016 for Illinois at Chicago Midway International Airport and for Georgia at Atlanta Hartsfield-Jackson International Airport, based on information obtained from the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, National Climatic Data Center.
(b)The 10-year average Heating Degree Days established by the Illinois Commission in Nicor Gas' 2009 rate case is 5,600 annually from 1998 through 2007.
The Company hedged its exposure to warmer-than-normal weather at Nicor Gas in Illinois; therefore, the weather-related negative pre-tax income impact on gas distribution operations was limited to $4 million ($2 million after tax), $1 million ($1 million after tax), $7 million ($5 million after tax), and a positive impact of $2 million ($1 million after tax) for the successor year ended December 31, 2017, the successor period of July 1, 2016 through December 31, 2016, the predecessor period of January 1, 2016 through June 30, 2016, and the predecessor year ended December 31, 2015, respectively.
The Company also hedged its exposure to warmer-than-normal weather at gas marketing services in Georgia and Illinois; therefore, the weather-related negative pre-tax income impact on gas marketing services was limited to $9 million ($5 million after tax) and $4 million ($3 million after tax) for the successor year ended December 31, 2017 and the successor period of July 1, 2016 through December 31, 2016, respectively. There was no weather impact for the predecessor period of January 1, 2016 through June 30, 2016 or the predecessor year ended December 31, 2015.
The following table provides the number of customers served by the Company for the periods presented:
  December 31,
  
2017(a)
 
2016(a)
 
2015(b)
  (in thousands, except market share %)
Gas distribution operations 4,623
 4,586
 4,526
Gas marketing services      
Energy customers(c)
 774
 656
 645
Market share of energy customers in Georgia 29.2% 29.6% 29.7%
Service contracts 1,184
 1,198
 1,171
(a)Includes customer and contract counts at December 31, 2017 and 2016.
(b)Includes average customer and contract counts for the year ended December 31, 2015.
(c)Includes approximately 140,000 customers at December 31, 2017 that were contracted to serve beginning April 1, 2017.
The Company anticipates overall customer growth trends at gas distribution operations to continue as it expects continued improvement in the new housing market and low natural gas prices. The Company uses a variety of targeted marketing programs to attract new customers and to retain existing customers.
Gas marketing services' market share in Georgia decreased at December 31, 2017 compared to the two prior years as a result of a highly competitive marketing environment, which is expected to continue for the foreseeable future. The Company will continue efforts at gas marketing services to enter into targeted markets and expand its energy customers and service contracts.

MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS (continued)
Southern Company Gas and Subsidiary Companies 2017 Annual Report


Cost of Natural Gas and Other Sales
Natural gas costs are the largest expense for the Company. Excluding Atlanta Gas Light, which does not sell natural gas to end-use customers, gas distribution operations charges its utility customers for natural gas consumed using natural gas cost recovery mechanisms set by the applicable state regulatory agencies. Under these mechanisms, all prudently-incurred natural gas costs are passed through to customers without markup, subject to regulatory review. Gas distribution operations defers or accrues the difference between the actual cost of natural gas and the amount of commodity revenue earned in a given period. The deferred or accrued amount is either billed or refunded to customers prospectively through adjustments to the commodity rate. Deferred natural gas costs are reflected as regulatory assets and accrued natural gas costs are reflected as regulatory liabilities. Therefore, gas costs recovered through natural gas revenues generally equal the amount expensed in cost of natural gas and do not affect net income from gas distribution operations. Cost of natural gas at gas distribution operations represented 79.6% of total cost of natural gas for 2017.
Gas marketing services customers are charged for actual or estimated natural gas consumed. Cost of natural gas includes the cost of fuel, lost and unaccounted for gas, adjustments to reduce the value of inventories to market value, and gains and losses associated with certain derivatives.
Cost of natural gas was $1.6 billion for the successor year ended December 31, 2017, which reflected an increase in natural gas pricing of 26.3% during the year compared to 2016, partially offset by lower demand for natural gas.
For the successor period of July 1, 2016 through December 31, 2016, cost of natural gas was $613 million and reflected low demand for natural gas driven by warm weather in the fourth quarter 2016.
Cost of natural gas was $755 million and $1.6 billion for the predecessor period of January 1, 2016 through June 30, 2016 and the year ended December 31, 2015, respectively, and reflected low demand for natural gas driven by warm weather during those periods.
The following table details the volumes of natural gas sold during all periods presented.
  Year Ended December 31, 2017 vs. 2016 2016 vs. 2015
  2017 2016 2015 % Change % Change
Gas distribution operations (mmBtu in millions)
          
Firm 667
 670
 695
 (0.4)% (3.6)%
Interruptible 95
 96
 99
 (1.0)% (3.0)%
Total 762
 766
 794
 (0.5)% (3.5)%
Gas marketing services (mmBtu in millions)
          
Firm:          
Georgia 23
 34
 35
 (32.4)% (2.9)%
Illinois 8
 12
 13
 (33.3)% (7.7)%
Other emerging markets 15
 12
 11
 25.0 % 9.1 %
Interruptible large commercial and industrial 11
 14
 14
 (21.4)%  %
Total 57
 72
 73
 (20.8)% (1.4)%
Wholesale gas services          
Daily physical sales (mmBtu in millions/day)
 6.4
 7.4
 6.8
 (13.5)% 8.8 %
Other Operations and Maintenance Expenses
For the successor year ended December 31, 2017, other operations and maintenance expenses were $940 million and primarily reflected compensation and benefit costs and professional services, including pipeline compliance and maintenance and legal services.
For the successor period of July 1, 2016 through December 31, 2016, other operations and maintenance expenses were $482 million and primarily reflected compensation and benefit costs and professional services, including pipeline compliance and maintenance and legal services.
For the predecessor period of January 1, 2016 through June 30, 2016, other operations and maintenance expenses were $454 million consistent with the level of expenses in the corresponding period in 2015.

MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS (continued)
Southern Company Gas and Subsidiary Companies 2017 Annual Report


For the predecessor year ended December 31, 2015, other operations and maintenance expenses were $928 million and included pipeline compliance and maintenance costs, compensation and benefit costs, and a $14 million goodwill impairment charge. See ACCOUNTING POLICIES – "Assessment of Assets" herein and Note 1 to the financial statements under "Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets and Liabilities" for additional information on the goodwill impairment charge.
Depreciation and Amortization
For the successor year ended December 31, 2017, depreciation and amortization was $501 million and included $38 million of additional amortization of intangible assets as a result of fair value adjustments in acquisition accounting, primarily at gas marketing services and $28 million in additional depreciation at gas distribution operations, primarily due to continued investment in infrastructure programs.
For the successor period of July 1, 2016 through December 31, 2016, depreciation and amortization was $238 million and included $23 million of additional amortization of intangible assets as a result of fair value adjustments in acquisition accounting, primarily at gas marketing services, as well as depreciation at gas distribution operations due to continued investment in infrastructure programs.
For the predecessor periods of January 1, 2016 through June 30, 2016 and the year ended December 31, 2015, depreciation and amortization was $206 million and $397 million, respectively, and reflected depreciation related to additional assets placed in service at gas distribution operations due to continued investment in infrastructure programs.
See Notes 3 and 11 to the financial statements under "Regulatory Matters – Regulatory Infrastructure Programs" and "Merger with Southern Company," respectively, for additional information on infrastructure programs and the application of acquisition accounting.
Taxes Other Than Income Taxes
For the successor year ended December 31, 2017, taxes other than income taxes were $184 million, which consisted primarily of revenue tax expenses, property taxes, and payroll taxes.
For the successor period of July 1, 2016 through December 31, 2016, taxes other than income taxes were $71 million, which consisted primarily of revenue tax expenses, property taxes, and payroll taxes.
For the predecessor periods of January 1, 2016 through June 30, 2016 and the year ended December 31, 2015, taxes other than income taxes were $99 million and $181 million, respectively, which consisted primarily of revenue tax expenses, property taxes, and payroll taxes.
Merger-Related Expenses
There were no Merger-related expenses in the successor year ended December 31, 2017.
For the successor period of July 1, 2016 through December 31, 2016, Merger-related expenses were $41 million, including $18 million in rate credits provided to the customers of Elizabethtown Gas and Elkton Gas as conditions of the Merger, $20 million for additional compensation-related expenses, and $3 million for financial advisory fees, legal expenses, and other Merger-related costs.
For the predecessor periods of January 1, 2016 through June 30, 2016 and the year ended December 31, 2015, Merger-related expenses were $56 million and $44 million, respectively, including $31 million and $20 million, respectively, for financial advisory fees, legal expenses, and other Merger-related costs, and $25 million and $24 million, respectively, for additional compensation-related expenses.
See Note 11 to the financial statements under "Merger with Southern Company" for additional information.
Earnings from Equity Method Investments
For the successor year ended December 31, 2017, earnings from equity method investments were $106 million, reflecting $88 million in earnings from the Company's investment in SNG, including $33 million related to a non-cash charge recorded by SNG to establish a regulatory liability associated with the Tax Reform Legislation, and $18 million in earnings from all other investments.
For the successor period of July 1, 2016 through December 31, 2016, earnings from equity method investments were $60 million, reflecting $56 million in earnings from the Company's investment in SNG and $4 million in earnings from all other investments.
For the predecessor periods of January 1, 2016 through June 30, 2016 and the year ended December 31, 2015, earnings from equity method investments were not material.

MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS (continued)
Southern Company Gas and Subsidiary Companies 2017 Annual Report


See Notes 4 and 11 to the financial statements under "Equity Method Investments" and "Investment in SNG," respectively, for additional information on the Company's investment in SNG.
Interest Expense, Net of Amounts Capitalized
For the successor year ended December 31, 2017, interest expense, net of amounts capitalized was $200 million, which includes the $38 million fair value adjustment on long-term debt in acquisition accounting. Interest expense also reflects debt issuances and redemptions during the period and the recognition of previously deferred interest related to regulatory infrastructure programs.
For the successor period of July 1, 2016 through December 31, 2016, interest expense, net of amounts capitalized was $81 million, which includes the $19 million fair value adjustment on long-term debt in acquisition accounting. Interest expense also reflects debt issuances and redemptions during the period and the recognition of previously deferred interest related to regulatory infrastructure programs.
For the predecessor periods of January 1, 2016 through June 30, 2016 and the year ended December 31, 2015, interest expense, net of amounts capitalized was $96 million and $175 million, respectively, reflecting debt issuances and redemptions during the period and the recognition of previously deferred interest related to regulatory infrastructure programs.
See FUTURE EARNINGS POTENTIAL – "Unrecognized Ratemaking Amounts" herein for additional information on the unrecognized costs related to the infrastructure programs. Also see FINANCIAL CONDITION AND LIQUIDITY – "Financing Activities" herein and Note 6 to the financial statements for additional information on outstanding debt.
Other Income (Expense), Net
For the successor year ended December 31, 2017, other income (expense), net was $39 million and primarily related to a $20 million gain from the settlement of contractor litigation claims, tax gross-up on contributions in aid of construction, and AFUDC. See Note 3 to the financial statements under "Regulatory Matters – PRP Settlement" for additional information on contractor litigation claims.
For the successor period of July 1, 2016 through December 31, 2016, other income (expense), net was $14 million and primarily related to the tax gross-up of contributions in aid of construction received from customers.
For the predecessor periods of January 1, 2016 through June 30, 2016 and the year ended December 31, 2015, other income (expense), net was not material.
Income Taxes
For the successor year ended December 31, 2017, income taxes were $367 million. The effective tax rate in 2017 reflects additional expense from the revaluation of deferred tax assets of $93 million associated with the Tax Reform Legislation and $37 million associated with State of Illinois income tax legislation enacted in the third quarter 2017 and new income tax apportionment factors in several states resulting from the Company's inclusion in the consolidated Southern Company state tax filings.
For the successor period of July 1, 2016 through December 31, 2016, income taxes were $76 million. The effective tax rate during this period reflects certain nondeductible Merger-related charges.
For the predecessor periods of January 1, 2016 through June 30, 2016 and the year ended December 31, 2015, income taxes were $87 million and $213 million, respectively. The effective tax rate in both periods reflects certain nondeductible Merger-related expenses and other charges.
The effective tax rate for each period presented is consistent when adjusted for the additional expense recorded from the revaluation of deferred tax assets associated with the Tax Reform Legislation, the State of Illinois income tax legislation enacted in the third quarter 2017, the allocation of new income tax apportionment factors in several states resulting from the Company's inclusion in the consolidated Southern Company state tax filings in 2017, and the nondeductible Merger-related charges for each period in 2017, 2016, and 2015.
See FUTURE EARNINGS POTENTIAL – "Income Tax Matters" herein and Note 5 to the financial statements for additional information.
Noncontrolling Interest
Prior to the October 2016 acquisition of Piedmont's 15% interest in SouthStar, net income attributable to noncontrolling interest was recorded on the statements of income and totaled $14 million and $20 million in the predecessor periods of January 1, 2016 through June 30, 2016 and the year ended December 31, 2015, respectively. See Note 4 to the financial statements under

MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS (continued)
Southern Company Gas and Subsidiary Companies 2017 Annual Report


"Variable Interest Entities" for additional information.
Effects of Inflation
The Company is subject to rate regulation that is generally based on the recovery of historical and projected costs. The effects of inflation can create an economic loss since the recovery of costs could be in dollars that have less purchasing power. Any adverse effect of inflation on the Company's results of operations has not been substantial in recent years.
Performance and Non-GAAP Measures
Prior to the Merger, the Company evaluated segment performance using EBIT, which includes operating income, earnings from equity method investments, and other income (expense), net. EBIT excludes interest expense, net of amounts capitalized and income taxes (benefit), which were evaluated on a consolidated basis for those periods. EBIT is used herein to discuss the results of the Company's segments for the predecessor periods, as EBIT was the primary measure of segment profit or loss for those periods. Subsequent to the Merger, the Company changed its segment performance measure from EBIT to net income to better align with the performance measure utilized by Southern Company. EBIT for the year ended December 31, 2017 and the period of July 1, 2016 through December 31, 2016 presented herein is considered a non-GAAP measure. The Company also discusses consolidated EBIT, which is considered a non-GAAP measure for all periods presented. The presentation of consolidated EBIT is believed to provide useful supplemental information regarding a consolidated measure of profit or loss. The Company further believes the presentation of segment EBIT for the year ended December 31, 2017 and the period of July 1, 2016 through December 31, 2016 is useful as it allows for a measure of comparability to other companies with different capital and legal structures, which accordingly may be subject to different interest rates and effective tax rates. The applicable reconciliations of net income to consolidated EBIT and segment EBIT are provided herein.
Adjusted operating margin is a non-GAAP measure that is calculated as operating revenues less cost of natural gas, cost of other sales, and revenue tax expense. Adjusted operating margin excludes other operations and maintenance expenses, depreciation and amortization, taxes other than income taxes, and Merger-related expenses, which are included in the calculation of operating income as calculated in accordance with GAAP and reflected in the statements of income. The presentation of adjusted operating margin is believed to provide useful information regarding the contribution resulting from customer growth at gas distribution operations since the cost of natural gas and revenue tax expense can vary significantly and are generally billed directly to customers. The Company further believes that utilizing adjusted operating margin at gas marketing services, wholesale gas services, and gas midstream operations allows it to focus on a direct measure of performance before overhead costs. The applicable reconciliation of operating income to adjusted operating margin is provided herein.
EBIT and adjusted operating margin should not be considered alternatives to, or more meaningful indicators of, the Company's operating performance than net income attributable to the Company or operating income as determined in accordance with GAAP. In addition, the Company's adjusted operating margin may not be comparable to similarly titled measures of other companies.
See RESULTS OF OPERATIONS herein for information on the Company's financial performance.
Reconciliations of operating income to adjusted operating margin and net income attributable to Southern Company Gas to EBIT are as follows:
 Successor  Predecessor
 Year Ended December 31, July 1, 2016 through December 31,  January 1, 2016 through June 30, Year Ended December 31,
 2017 2016  2016 2015
 (in millions)  (in millions)
Operating Income$665
 $197
  $321
 $746
Other operating expenses(a)
1,625
 832
  815
 1,550
Revenue tax expense(b)
(98) (31)  (56) (101)
Adjusted Operating Margin$2,192
 $998
  $1,080
 $2,195
(a)Includes other operations and maintenance, depreciation and amortization, taxes other than income taxes, and Merger-related expenses.
(b)Nicor Gas' revenue tax expenses, which are passed through directly to customers.

MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS (continued)
Southern Company Gas and Subsidiary Companies 2017 Annual Report


 Successor  Predecessor
 Year Ended December 31, July 1, 2016 through December 31,  January 1, 2016 through June 30, Year Ended December 31,
 2017 2016  2016 2015
 (in millions)  (in millions)
Net Income Attributable to Southern Company Gas$243
 $114
  $131
 $353
Net income attributable to noncontrolling interest
 
  14
 20
Income taxes367
 76
  87
 213
Interest expense, net of amounts capitalized200
 81
  96
 175
EBIT$810
 $271
  $328
 $761
Segment Information
Adjusted operating margin, operating expenses, and the Company's primary performance metric for each segment are illustrated in the tables below.
  Successor
  Year ended December 31, 2017 July 1, 2016 through December 31, 2016
  
 Adjusted Operating Margin(*)
 
Operating Expenses(*)
 Net Income 
Adjusted Operating Margin(*)
 
Operating Expenses(*)
 Net Income
  (in millions) (in millions)
Gas distribution operations $1,834
 $1,184
 $353
 $817
 $595
 $77
Gas marketing services 313
 200
 84
 139
 112
 19
Wholesale gas services 5
 56
 (57) 24
 26
 
Gas midstream operations 42
 52
 3
 19
 26
 20
All other 10
 47
 (140) 3
 46
 (2)
Intercompany eliminations (12) (12) 
 (4) (4) 
Consolidated $2,192
 $1,527
 $243
 $998
 $801
 $114
(*)Adjusted operating margin and operating expenses are adjusted for Nicor Gas revenue tax expenses, which are passed through directly to customers.
  Predecessor
  January 1, 2016 through June 30, 2016 Year ended December 31, 2015
  
Adjusted Operating Margin(*)
 
Operating Expenses(*)
 EBIT 
Adjusted Operating Margin(*)
 
Operating Expenses(*)
 EBIT
  (in millions) (in millions)
Gas distribution operations $911
 $560
 $353
 $1,657
 $1,086
 $581
Gas marketing services 190
 81
 109
 317
 165
 152
Wholesale gas services (36) 33
 (68) 183
 71
 110
Gas midstream operations 15
 24
 (6) 36
 62
 (23)
All other 4
 65
 (60) 7
 70
 (59)
Intercompany eliminations (4) (4) 
 (5) (5) 
Consolidated $1,080
 $759
 $328
 $2,195
 $1,449
 $761
(*)Adjusted operating margin and operating expenses are adjusted for Nicor Gas revenue tax expenses, which are passed through directly to customers.
Gas Distribution Operations
Gas distribution operations is the largest component of the Company's business and is subject to regulation and oversight by agencies in each of the states it serves. These agencies approve natural gas rates designed to provide the Company with the

MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS (continued)
Southern Company Gas and Subsidiary Companies 2017 Annual Report


opportunity to generate revenues to recover the cost of natural gas delivered to its customers and its fixed and variable costs, including depreciation, interest, maintenance, taxes, and overhead costs, and to earn a reasonable return on its investments.
With the exception of Atlanta Gas Light, the Company's second largest utility that operates in a deregulated natural gas market and has a straight-fixed-variable rate design that minimizes the variability of its revenues based on consumption, the earnings of the natural gas distribution utilities can be affected by customer consumption patterns that are a function of weather conditions, price levels for natural gas, and general economic conditions that may impact customers' ability to pay for natural gas consumed. The Company has various weather mechanisms, such as weather normalization mechanisms and weather derivative instruments, that limit its exposure to weather changes within typical ranges in its natural gas distribution utilities' service territories.
Successor Year Ended December 31, 2017
Net income of $353 million includes $1.8 billion in adjusted operating margin, $1.2 billion in operating expenses, and $34 million in other income (expense), net, which resulted in EBIT of $684 million. Net income also includes $153 million in interest expense, net of amounts capitalized and $178 million in income tax expense. Adjusted operating margin reflects $99 million in additional revenue from continued investment in infrastructure replacement programs and base rate increases at Atlanta Gas Light, Elizabethtown Gas, and Virginia Natural Gas. Adjusted operating margin was also affected by increased customer growth, partially offset by the negative impact of warmer-than-normal weather, net of hedging. Operating expenses reflect a $28 million increase in depreciation associated with additional assets placed in service, as well as benefit and compensation costs, legal expenses, and pipeline compliance and maintenance expenses. Other income (expense), net reflects a $20 million gain from the settlement of contractor litigation claims. Interest expense reflects the impact of intercompany promissory notes executed in December 2016 and the issuance of first mortgage bonds at Nicor Gas on August 10, 2017 and November 1, 2017. Income tax expense includes a $22 million benefit as a result of the Tax Reform Legislation.
See Note 3 to the financial statements under "Regulatory Matters – PRP Settlement" for additional information on contractor litigation claims. See FINANCIAL CONDITION AND LIQUIDITY – "Financing Activities" herein and Note 6 to the financial statements for additional information on debt issuances. See FUTURE EARNINGS POTENTIAL – "Income Tax Matters" herein and Note 5 to the financial statements for additional information.
Successor Period of July 1, 2016 through December 31, 2016
Net income of $77 million includes $817 million in adjusted operating margin, $595 million in operating expenses, and $11 million in other income (expense), net, resulting in EBIT of $233 million. Net income also includes $105 million in interest expense, net of amounts capitalized and $51 million in income tax expense. Adjusted operating margin reflects revenue from continued investment in infrastructure replacement programs, partially offset by the impact of warm weather, net of hedging. Operating expenses reflect the depreciation associated with additional assets placed in service, the related expenses associated with pipeline compliance and maintenance activities, and $18 million of rate credits provided to the customers of Elizabethtown Gas and Elkton Gas as conditions of the Merger. See Note 11 to the financial statements under "Merger with Southern Company" for additional information.
Predecessor Period of January 1, 2016 through June 30, 2016
EBIT of $353 million includes $911 million in adjusted operating margin, $560 million in operating expense, and $2 million in other income (expense), net. Adjusted operating margin reflects increased revenue from continued investment in infrastructure replacement programs and the impact of customer usage and growth, partially offset by the impact of warm weather, net of hedging. Operating expenses reflect the depreciation associated with additional assets placed in service.
Predecessor Year Ended December 31, 2015
EBIT of $581 million includes $1.7 billion in adjusted operating margin, $1.1 billion in operating expense, and $10 million in other income (expense), net. Adjusted operating margin reflects revenue from the continued investment in infrastructure replacement programs, the impact of customer usage and growth, and the impact of warm weather, net of hedging. Operating expenses reflect the depreciation associated with additional assets placed in service, as well as benefits and compensation costs.
Gas Marketing Services
Gas marketing services consists of several businesses that provide energy-related products and services to natural gas markets, including warranty sales. Gas marketing services is weather sensitive and uses a variety of hedging strategies, such as weather derivative instruments and other risk management tools, to partially mitigate potential weather impacts. Operating expenses primarily reflect employee costs, marketing, customer care, and bad debt expenses.

MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS (continued)
Southern Company Gas and Subsidiary Companies 2017 Annual Report


Successor Year Ended December 31, 2017
Net income of $84 million includes $313 million in adjusted operating margin and $200 million in operating expenses, which resulted in EBIT of $113 million. Net income also includes $5 million in interest expense, net of amounts capitalized and $24 million in income tax expense. Adjusted operating margin reflects a $9 million negative impact of warmer-than-normal weather, net of hedging, and $4 million in unrealized hedge losses, net of recoveries. Operating expenses includes $40 million in additional amortization of intangible assets established in the application of acquisition accounting. Income tax expense includes a $19 million benefit as a result of the Tax Reform Legislation. See FUTURE EARNINGS POTENTIAL – "Income Tax Matters" herein and Note 5 to the financial statements for additional information.
Successor Period of July 1, 2016 through December 31, 2016
Net income of $19 million includes $139 million in adjusted operating margin and $112 million in operating expenses, resulting in EBIT of $27 million. Net income also includes $1 million in interest expense, net of amounts capitalized and $7 million in income tax expense. Adjusted operating margin reflects a reduction of $5 million due to fair value adjustments to certain assets and liabilities in the application of acquisition accounting. Also reflected in adjusted operating margin are unrealized hedge gains and LOCOM adjustments. Operating expenses reflect $23 million in additional amortization of intangible assets, partially offset by a $2 million reduction in operations and maintenance expense due to fair value adjustments to certain assets and liabilities in the application of acquisition accounting. See Note 1 to the financial statements under "Natural Gas for Sale" for additional information on LOCOM adjustments and Note 11 to the financial statements for additional information on the Merger.
Predecessor Period of January 1, 2016 through June 30, 2016
EBIT of $109 million includes $190 million in adjusted operating margin and $81 million in operating expenses. Adjusted operating margin reflects $9 million in unrealized hedge gains. Operating expenses reflect lower bad debt, marketing, and depreciation and amortization, compared to the same period in the prior year. Earnings also include $14 million attributable to noncontrolling interest.
Predecessor Year Ended December 31, 2015
EBIT of $152 million includes $317 million in adjusted operating margin and $165 million in operating expenses. Adjusted operating margin reflects revenue from gas marketing and warranty sales, which were partially offset by the impact of warm weather, net of hedging. Operating expenses primarily reflect compensation and benefits costs. Earnings also include $20 million attributable to noncontrolling interest.
Wholesale Gas Services
Wholesale gas services is involved in asset management and optimization, storage, transportation, producer and peaking services, natural gas supply, natural gas services, and wholesale gas marketing. The Company has positioned the business to generate positive economic earnings on an annual basis even under low volatility market conditions that can result from a number of factors. When market price volatility increases, wholesale gas services is well positioned to capture significant value and generate stronger results. Wholesale gas services generated positive economic results for the successor year ended December 31, 2017, primarily reflecting lower volatility market conditions throughout the majority of 2017 and higher volatility along with the widening of locational and transportation spreads in December 2017 due to colder weather, as well as higher natural gas storage value resulting from higher natural gas prices.
Successor Year Ended December 31, 2017
Net loss of $57 million includes $5 million in adjusted operating margin, $56 million in operating expenses, and $1 million in other income (expense), net, which resulted in a loss before interest and taxes of $50 million. Also included are $7 million in interest expense, net of amounts capitalized. Adjusted operating margin reflects a decrease of $21 million due to fair value adjustments to certain assets and liabilities in the application of acquisition accounting. Also reflected in adjusted operating margin is revenue from commercial activity partially offset by mark-to-market losses. Income tax expense includes $21 million resulting from the revaluation of deferred income tax assets associated with the Tax Reform Legislation. See FUTURE EARNINGS POTENTIAL – "Income Tax Matters" herein and Note 5 to the financial statements for additional information on income taxes.
Successor Period of July 1, 2016 through December 31, 2016
Net income includes $24 million in adjusted operating margin, $26 million in operating expenses, and $2 million in other income (expense), net, resulting in no EBIT. Also included are $3 million in interest expense, net of amounts capitalized and $3 million in income tax benefit. Adjusted operating margin reflects a decrease of $5 million due to fair value adjustments to certain assets and

MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS (continued)
Southern Company Gas and Subsidiary Companies 2017 Annual Report


liabilities in the application of acquisition accounting. Also reflected in adjusted operating margin are mark-to-market gains due to changes in natural gas prices in the fourth quarter 2016 and losses from commercial activity due to low volatility in natural gas prices and warm weather. Operating expenses reflect low incentive compensation expense due to low earnings.
Predecessor Period of January 1, 2016 through June 30, 2016
Loss before interest and taxes of $68 million includes $(36) million in adjusted operating margin, $33 million in operating expense, and $1 million in other income (expense), net. Adjusted operating margin reflects mark-to-market losses and LOCOM adjustments as a result of changes in natural gas prices and revenues from commercial activity driven by changes in price volatility. Operating expenses reflect lower incentive compensation expense as compared to the same period in the prior year due to lower earnings.
Predecessor Year Ended December 31, 2015
EBIT of $110 million includes $183 million in adjusted operating margin, $71 million in operating expenses, and $(2) million in other income (expense), net. Adjusted operating margin reflects revenue from commercial activity driven by changes in price volatility, mark-to-market gains, and LOCOM adjustments as a result of changes in natural gas prices.
The following table illustrates the components of wholesale gas services' adjusted operating margin for the periods presented:
 Successor  Predecessor
 Year Ended December 31, July 1, 2016 through December 31,  January 1, 2016 through June 30, Year Ended December 31,
 2017  2016  2016 2015
 (in millions)  (in millions)
Commercial activity recognized$116
 $(15)  $34
 $140
Gain (loss) on storage derivatives23
 (20)  (38) 45
Gain (loss) on transportation and forward
commodity derivatives
(113) 64
  (31) 11
LOCOM adjustments, net of current period recoveries
 
  (1) (13)
Purchase accounting adjustments to fair value
inventory and contracts
(21) (5)  
 
Adjusted operating margin$5
 $24
  $(36) $183
Change in Commercial Activity
The commercial activity at wholesale gas services includes recognition of storage and transportation values that were generated in prior periods, which reflect the impact of prior period hedge gains and losses as associated physical transactions occur. Warmer-than-normal weather during the 2016/2017 Heating Season, lower power generation volumes, and build-out of new U.S. pipeline infrastructure, along with increases in natural gas supply, caused low volatility and a tightening of locational or transportation spreads throughout the majority of 2017, negatively impacting the amount of commercial activity revenues generated relative to demand fees for contracted pipeline transportation and storage capacity, and minimum sharing under asset management agreements. However, during December 2017, significantly colder weather increased natural gas price volatility and transportation spreads widened, enabling wholesale gas services to capture higher commercial activity. Further, as natural gas prices and forward storage or time spreads increased, wholesale gas services was able to capture higher storage values that it expects to recognize as commercial activity revenues when natural gas is physically withdrawn from storage.
Change in Storage and Transportation Derivatives
Volatility in the natural gas market arises from a number of factors, such as weather fluctuations or changes in supply or demand for natural gas in different regions of the U.S. The volatility of natural gas commodity prices has a significant impact on the Company's customer rates, long-term competitive position against other energy sources, and the ability of wholesale gas services to capture value from locational and seasonal spreads. Transportation and forward commodity derivative losses are primarily the result of widening transportation spreads during the fourth quarter 2017 due to significantly colder weather in the Northeast and Midwest U.S., which impacted forward prices at natural gas receipt and delivery points. Additionally, during 2017, forward storage or time spreads applicable to the locations of wholesale gas services' specific storage positions resulted in storage derivative gains.

MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS (continued)
Southern Company Gas and Subsidiary Companies 2017 Annual Report


The natural gas that the Company purchases and injects into storage is accounted for at the LOCOM value utilizing gas daily or spot prices at the end of the year. Wholesale gas services recorded LOCOM adjustments of $19 million for the predecessor year ended December 31, 2015. LOCOM adjustments for all other periods presented were immaterial. See Note 1 to the financial statements under "Natural Gas for Sale" for additional information.
Withdrawal Schedule and Physical Transportation Transactions
The expected natural gas withdrawals from storage and expected offset to prior hedge losses/gains associated with the transportation portfolio of wholesale gas services are presented in the following table, along with the net operating revenues expected at the time of withdrawal from storage and the physical flow of natural gas between contracted transportation receipt and delivery points. Wholesale gas services' expected net operating revenues exclude storage and transportation demand charges, as well as other variable fuel, withdrawal, receipt, and delivery charges, but are net of the estimated impact of profit sharing under its asset management agreements. Further, the amounts that are realizable in future periods are based on the inventory withdrawal schedule, planned physical flow of natural gas between the transportation receipt and delivery points, and forward natural gas prices at December 31, 2017. A portion of wholesale gas services' storage inventory and transportation capacity is economically hedged with futures contracts, which results in the realization of substantially fixed net operating revenues.
 Storage Withdrawal  
 
Total storage
(WACOG $2.66)
 
Expected net operating gains(a)
 
Physical Transportation Transactions – Expected Net Operating Gains(b)
 (in mmBtu in millions) (in millions) (in millions)
201855.2
 $14
 $70
2019 and thereafter2.3
 1
 43
Total at December 31, 201757.5
 $15
 $113
(a)Represents expected operating gains from planned storage withdrawals associated with existing inventory positions and could change as wholesale gas services adjusts its daily injection and withdrawal plans in response to changes in future market conditions and forward NYMEX price fluctuations. Also includes the impact of purchase accounting adjustments to reflect natural gas storage inventory at market value. Excluding the impact of these adjustments, the expected net operating gains at December 31, 2017 would have been $22 million.
(b)Represents the periods associated with the transportation derivative (gains) and losses during which the derivatives will be settled and the physical transportation transactions will occur that offset the derivative losses that were previously recognized.
Gas Midstream Operations
Gas midstream operations consists primarily of gas pipeline investments, with storage and fuels also aggregated into this segment. Gas pipeline investments include SNG, Horizon Pipeline, Atlantic Coast Pipeline, PennEast Pipeline, Dalton Pipeline, and Magnolia Enterprise Holdings, Inc. See Note 4 to the financial statements under "Equity Method Investments" for additional information.
Successor Year Ended December 31, 2017
Net income of $3 million includes $42 million in adjusted operating margin, $52 million in operating expenses, $103 million in earnings from equity method investments, consisting primarily of the Company's equity interest in SNG, including $33 million related to a non-cash charge recorded by SNG to establish a regulatory liability associated with the Tax Reform Legislation, and $4 million in other income, which resulted in EBIT of $97 million. Also included in net income are $33 million in interest expense, net of amounts capitalized and $61 million in income tax expense. Income tax expense includes $27 million resulting from the revaluation of deferred income tax assets associated with the Tax Reform Legislation and $8 million related to the allocation of new income tax apportionment factors in several states resulting from the Company's inclusion in the consolidated Southern Company state tax filings. See FUTURE EARNINGS POTENTIAL – "Income Tax Matters" herein and Note 5 to the financial statements for additional information on income taxes.
Successor Period of July 1, 2016 through December 31, 2016
Net income of $20 million includes $19 million in adjusted operating margin, $26 million in operating expenses, $58 million in earnings from equity method investments, consisting primarily of the Company's September 2016 acquired equity interest in SNG, and $1 million in other income, resulting in EBIT of $52 million. Also included in net income are $16 million in interest expense, net of amounts capitalized and $16 million in income tax expense.

MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS (continued)
Southern Company Gas and Subsidiary Companies 2017 Annual Report


Predecessor Periods of January 1, 2016 through June 30, 2016 and the Year Ended December 31, 2015
Loss before interest and taxes for the predecessor periods of January 1, 2016 through June 30, 2016 and the year ended December 31, 2015 were $6 million and $23 million, respectively, and reflected a $14 million goodwill impairment charge in 2015.
All Other
All other includes the Company's investment in Triton, AGL Services Company, and Southern Company Gas Capital, as well as various corporate operating expenses that are not allocated to the reportable segments and interest income (expense) associated with affiliate financing arrangements.
Successor Year Ended December 31, 2017
Net loss of $140 million includes $10 million in adjusted operating margin and $47 million in operating expenses. Operating expenses included $26 million of integration-related costs. Interest expense, net of amounts capitalized was $2 million due to the intercompany promissory notes that were executed in December 2016. Income tax expense was $104 million and includes $86 million resulting from the revaluation of deferred tax assets associated with the Tax Reform Legislation and $29 million associated with State of Illinois tax legislation enacted during the third quarter 2017 and new income tax apportionment factors in several states resulting from the Company's inclusion in the consolidated Southern Company state tax filings. See FINANCIAL CONDITION AND LIQUIDITY – "Financing Activities" herein for additional financing information and FUTURE EARNINGS POTENTIAL – "Income Tax Matters" herein and Note 5 to the financial statements for additional information on income taxes.
Successor Period of July 1, 2016 through December 31, 2016
Operating expenses included Merger-related expenses of $41 million primarily comprised of compensation-related expenses, financial advisory fees, legal expenses, and other Merger-related costs and $8 million in expenses associated with certain benefit arrangements.
Predecessor Periods of January 1, 2016 through June 30, 2016 and the Year Ended December 31, 2015
For the predecessor periods of January 1, 2016 through June 30, 2016 and the year ended December 31, 2015, operating expenses included Merger-related expenses of $56 million and $44 million, respectively. These expenses are primarily comprised of financial advisory and legal expenses as well as additional compensation-related expenses, including acceleration of share-based compensation expenses, and change-in-control compensation charges. See Note 11 to the financial statements under "Merger with Southern Company" for additional information.
Segment Reconciliations
Reconciliations of net income attributable to Southern Company Gas to EBIT for the year ended December 31, 2017 and the period of July 1, 2016 through December 31, 2016, and operating income to adjusted operating margin for all periods presented, are in the following tables. See Note 12 to the financial statements for additional segment information.
 Successor
 Year Ended December 31, 2017
 Gas Distribution OperationsGas Marketing ServicesWholesale Gas ServicesGas Midstream OperationsAll OtherIntercompany EliminationConsolidated
 (in millions)
Net Income (Loss) Attributable
to Southern Company Gas
$353
$84
$(57)$3
$(140)$
$243
Income taxes178
24

61
104

367
Interest expense, net of amounts
capitalized
153
5
7
33
2

200
EBIT$684
$113
$(50)$97
$(34)$
$810

MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS (continued)
Southern Company Gas and Subsidiary Companies 2017 Annual Report


 Successor
 July 1, 2016 through December 31, 2016
 Gas Distribution OperationsGas Marketing ServicesWholesale Gas ServicesGas Midstream OperationsAll OtherIntercompany EliminationConsolidated
 (in millions)
Net Income (Loss) Attributable
to Southern Company Gas
$77
$19
$
$20
$(2)$
$114
Income taxes (benefit)51
7
(3)16
5

76
Interest expense, net of amounts
capitalized
105
1
3
16
(44)
81
EBIT$233
$27
$
$52
$(41)$
$271
 Successor
 Year Ended December 31, 2017
 Gas Distribution OperationsGas Marketing ServicesWholesale Gas ServicesGas Midstream OperationsAll OtherIntercompany EliminationConsolidated
 (in millions)
Operating Income (Loss)$650
$113
$(51)$(10)$(37)$
$665
Other operating expenses(a)
1,282
200
56
52
47
(12)1,625
Revenue tax expense(b)
(98)




(98)
Adjusted Operating Margin 
$1,834
$313
$5
$42
$10
$(12)$2,192
 Successor
 July 1, 2016 through December 31, 2016
 Gas Distribution OperationsGas Marketing ServicesWholesale Gas ServicesGas Midstream OperationsAll OtherIntercompany EliminationConsolidated
 (in millions)
Operating Income (Loss)$222
$27
$(2)$(7)$(43)$
$197
Other operating expenses(a)
626
112
26
26
46
(4)832
Revenue tax expense(b)
(31)




(31)
Adjusted Operating Margin 
$817
$139
$24
$19
$3
$(4)$998
 Predecessor
 January 1, 2016 through June 30, 2016
 Gas Distribution OperationsGas Marketing ServicesWholesale Gas ServicesGas Midstream OperationsAll OtherIntercompany EliminationConsolidated
 (in millions)
Operating Income (Loss)$351
$109
$(69)$(9)$(61)$
$321
Other operating expenses(a)
616
81
33
24
65
(4)815
Revenue tax expense(b)
(56)




(56)
Adjusted Operating Margin 
$911
$190
$(36)$15
$4
$(4)$1,080

MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS (continued)
Southern Company Gas and Subsidiary Companies 2017 Annual Report


 Predecessor
 Year Ended December 31, 2015
 Gas Distribution OperationsGas Marketing ServicesWholesale Gas ServicesGas Midstream OperationsAll OtherIntercompany EliminationConsolidated
 (in millions)
Operating Income (Loss)$571
$152
$112
$(26)$(63)$
$746
Other operating expenses(a)
1,187
165
71
62
70
(5)1,550
Revenue tax expense(b)
(101)




(101)
Adjusted Operating Margin 
$1,657
$317
$183
$36
$7
$(5)$2,195
(a)Includes other operations and maintenance, depreciation and amortization, taxes other than income taxes, goodwill impairment in 2015, and Merger-related expenses.
(b)Nicor Gas' revenue tax expenses, which are passed through directly to customers.
FUTURE EARNINGS POTENTIAL
General
The results of operations for the past three years are not necessarily indicative of future earnings potential. The level of the Company's future earnings depends on numerous factors that affect the opportunities, challenges, and risks of the Company's primary business of natural gas distribution and its complementary businesses in the gas marketing services, wholesale gas services, and gas midstream operations sectors. These factors include the Company's ability to maintain a constructive regulatory environment that allows for the timely recovery of prudently-incurred costs, the completion and subsequent operation of ongoing infrastructure and other construction projects, creditworthiness of customers, the Company's ability to optimize its transportation and storage positions, and its ability to re-contract storage rates at favorable prices.
Future earnings will be driven primarily by customer growth and are subject to a variety of other factors. These factors include weather, competition, new energy contracts with other utilities and other wholesale customers, energy conservation practiced by customers, the use of alternative energy sources by customers, the price of natural gas, the price elasticity of demand, and the rate of economic growth or decline in the Company's service territories. Demand for natural gas is primarily driven by the pace of economic growth that may be affected by changes in regional and global economic conditions, which may impact future earnings.
Volatility of natural gas prices has a significant impact on the Company's customer rates, long-term competitive position against other energy sources, and the ability of its gas marketing services and wholesale gas services segments to capture value from locational and seasonal spreads. Additionally, changes in commodity prices subject a significant portion of the Company's operations to earnings variability. Over the longer term, volatility is expected to be low to moderate and locational and/or transportation spreads are expected to decrease as new pipelines are built to reduce the existing supply constraints in the shale areas of the Northeast U.S. To the extent these pipelines are delayed or not built, volatility could increase. Additional economic factors may contribute to this environment, including a significant drop in oil and natural gas prices, which could lead to consolidation of natural gas producers or reduced levels of natural gas production. Further, if economic conditions continue to improve, including the new housing market, the demand for natural gas may increase, which may cause natural gas prices to rise and drive higher volatility in the natural gas markets on a longer-term basis.
On December 22, 2017, the Tax Reform Legislation was signed into law and became effective on January 1, 2018, which among other things, reduces the federal corporate income tax rate to 21% and changes rates of depreciation and the business interest deduction. On July 6, 2017, the State of Illinois enacted tax legislation that repealed its non-combination tax rule and increased the effective corporate income tax rate effective July 1, 2017. In addition, Southern Company calculated new apportionment factors in several states to include the Company in its consolidated tax filings. See "Income Tax Matters" and FINANCIAL CONDITION AND LIQUIDITY – "Credit Rating Risk" herein and Notes 3 and 5 to the financial statements for additional information.
As part of its business strategy, the Company regularly considers and evaluates joint development arrangements as well as acquisitions and dispositions of businesses and assets. On October 15, 2017, the Company's subsidiary Pivotal Utility Holdings entered into agreements for the sale of the assets of two of its natural gas distribution utilities, Elizabethtown Gas and Elkton Gas, to South Jersey Industries, Inc.; the asset sales are expected to be completed by the end of the third quarter 2018. Net income attributable to Elizabethtown Gas and Elkton Gas for the year ended December 31, 2017 was $34 million. However, due to the seasonal nature of the natural gas business and other factors including, but not limited to, weather, regulation, competition,

MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS (continued)
Southern Company Gas and Subsidiary Companies 2017 Annual Report


customer demand, and general economic conditions, the 2017 net income is not necessarily indicative of the results to be expected for any other period. See BUSINESS – "Seasonality" in Item 1, RISK FACTORS in Item 1A, and Note 11 to the financial statements under "Proposed Sale of Elizabethtown Gas and Elkton Gas" for additional information.
Environmental Matters
The Company's operations are regulated by state and federal environmental agencies through a variety of laws and regulations governing air, water, land, and protection of other natural resources. The Company maintains a comprehensive environmental compliance strategy to assess upcoming requirements and compliance costs associated with these environmental laws and regulations. The costs, including capital expenditures and operations and maintenance costs, required to comply with environmental laws and regulations may impact future results of operations, cash flows, and financial condition. A major portion of these compliance costs are expected to be recovered through existing ratemaking provisions. The ultimate impact of the environmental laws and regulations discussed below will depend on various factors, such as state adoption and implementation of requirements and the outcome of pending and/or future legal challenges.
New or revised environmental laws and regulations could affect many areas of the Company's operations. The impact of any such changes cannot be determined at this time. Environmental compliance costs could affect earnings if such costs cannot continue to be fully recovered in rates on a timely basis. Further, increased costs that are recovered through regulated rates could contribute to reduced demand for natural gas, which could negatively affect results of operations, cash flows, and financial condition. Additionally, many commercial and industrial customers may also be affected by existing and future environmental requirements, which for some may have the potential to ultimately affect their demand for natural gas. See Note 3 to the financial statements under "Environmental Matters" for additional information.
Environmental Remediation
The Company is subject to environmental remediation liabilities associated with 46 former MGP sites in five different states. The Company conducts studies to determine the extent of any required cleanup and has recognized the costs to clean up known impacted sites in its financial statements. Accrued environmental remediation costs totaling $388 million were included in the balance sheets at December 31, 2017, $46 million of which is expected to be incurred over the next 12 months. The natural gas distribution utilities in Illinois, New Jersey, Georgia, and Florida have all received authority from their respective state regulators to recover approved environmental compliance costs through regulatory mechanisms, which covers substantially all of the total accrued remediation costs. See FINANCIAL CONDITION AND LIQUIDITY – "Capital Requirements and Contractual Obligations" herein for additional information.
Water Quality
In 2015, the EPA and the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (Corps) jointly published a final rule that revised the regulatory definition of waters of the United States (WOTUS) for all Clean Water Act programs. The rule significantly expanded the scope of federal jurisdiction over waterbodies (such as rivers, streams, and canals), which could impact permitting and reporting requirements associated with the installation, expansion, and maintenance of pipeline projects. On July 27, 2017, the EPA and the Corps proposed to rescind the 2015 WOTUS rule. The WOTUS rule has been stayed by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit since late 2015, but on January 22, 2018, the U.S. Supreme Court determined that federal district courts have jurisdiction over the pending challenges to the rule. On February 6, 2018, the EPA and the Corps published a final rule delaying implementation of the 2015 WOTUS rule to 2020.
FERC Matters
The Company is involved in two significant pipeline construction projects within gas midstream operations. These projects, along with the Company's existing pipelines, are intended to provide diverse sources of natural gas supplies to customers, resolve current and long-term supply planning for new capacity, enhance system reliability, and generate economic development in the areas served. The following table provides an overview of these pipeline projects.

MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS (continued)
Southern Company Gas and Subsidiary Companies 2017 Annual Report


 Miles of Pipe Capital
Expenditures
 Ownership
Interest
   (in millions)  
Atlantic Coast Pipeline(a)(b)
594
 $310
 5%
PennEast Pipeline(a)(c)
118
 276
 20%
Total712
 $586
  
(a)Represents the Company's expected capital expenditures and ownership interest, which may change.
(b)In 2014, the Company entered into a joint venture to construct and operate a natural gas pipeline that will run from West Virginia through Virginia and into eastern North Carolina to meet the region's growing demand for natural gas. The proposed pipeline project is expected to transport natural gas to customers in Virginia. On October 13, 2017, the Atlantic Coast Pipeline project received FERC approval. The joint venture continues to work with state and other federal agencies to obtain the required environmental permits to begin construction.
(c)In 2014, the Company entered into a joint venture to construct and operate a natural gas pipeline that will transport low-cost natural gas from the Marcellus Shale area to customers in New Jersey. The Company believes this will alleviate takeaway constraints in the Marcellus region and help mitigate some of the price volatility experienced during recent winters. On January 19, 2018, the PennEast Pipeline project received FERC approval. The joint venture continues to work with state and other federal agencies to obtain the required environmental permits to begin construction.
On August 1, 2017, the Dalton Pipeline, which serves as an extension of the Transco pipeline system and provides additional natural gas supply to customers in Georgia, was placed in service. The Company has a 50% ownership interest in the Dalton Pipeline. See Note 4 to the financial statements for additional information.
On January 16, 2018, the Georgia PSC approved SNG's purchase of Georgia Power Company's natural gas lateral pipeline serving Plant McDonough Units 4 through 6 at net book value. Pursuant to this approval, legal transfer of the lateral pipeline is expected to occur in the fourth quarter 2018 and payment of $142 million is expected to occur in the first quarter 2020. During this interim period, Georgia Power Company will receive a discounted shipping rate to reflect the delayed consideration. Completion of this sale is contingent on certain conditions being satisfied by SNG that include, among other things, expansion of the existing lateral pipeline. The Company's portion of the expected capital expenditures for this project is $120 million. On February 15, 2018, FERC approval was obtained. The ultimate outcome of this matter cannot be determined at this time.
Regulatory Matters
Utility Regulation and Rate Design
The natural gas distribution utilities are subject to regulations and oversight by their respective state regulatory agencies for the rates charged to their customers, maintenance of accounting records, and various service and safety matters. Rates charged to customers vary according to customer class (residential, commercial, or industrial) and rate jurisdiction. These agencies approve rates designed to provide the opportunity to generate revenues to recover all prudently-incurred costs, including a return on rate base sufficient to pay interest on debt and provide a reasonable ROE. Rate base generally consists of the original cost of the utility plant in service, working capital, and certain other assets, less accumulated depreciation on the utility plant in service and net deferred income tax liabilities, and may include certain other additions or deductions.
The natural gas market for Atlanta Gas Light was deregulated in 1997. Accordingly, Marketers, rather than a traditional utility, sell natural gas to end-use customers in Georgia and handle customer billing functions. The Marketers file their rates monthly with the Georgia PSC. As a result of operating in a deregulated environment, Atlanta Gas Light's role includes:
distributing natural gas for Marketers;
constructing, operating, and maintaining the gas system infrastructure, including responding to customer service calls and leaks;
reading meters and maintaining underlying customer premise information for Marketers; and
planning and contracting for capacity on interstate transportation and storage systems.
Atlanta Gas Light earns revenue by charging rates to its customers based primarily on monthly fixed charges that are set by the Georgia PSC and adjusted periodically. The Marketers add these fixed charges when billing customers. This mechanism, called a straight-fixed-variable rate design, minimizes the seasonality of Atlanta Gas Light's revenues since the monthly fixed charge is not volumetric or directly weather dependent.
With the exception of Atlanta Gas Light, the earnings of the natural gas distribution utilities can be affected by customer consumption patterns that are largely a function of weather conditions and price levels for natural gas. Specifically, customer demand substantially increases during the Heating Season when natural gas is used for heating purposes. The Company has various mechanisms, such as weather normalization mechanisms and weather derivative instruments, at most of its utilities that limit exposure to weather changes within typical ranges in these utilities' respective service territories.

MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS (continued)
Southern Company Gas and Subsidiary Companies 2017 Annual Report


With the exception of Atlanta Gas Light, the natural gas distribution utilities are authorized by the relevant regulatory agencies in the states in which they serve to use natural gas cost recovery mechanisms that adjust rates to reflect changes in the wholesale cost of natural gas and ensure recovery of all costs prudently incurred in purchasing natural gas for customers. Since Atlanta Gas Light does not sell natural gas directly to its end-use customers, it does not utilize a traditional natural gas cost recovery mechanism. However, Atlanta Gas Light does maintain natural gas inventory for the Marketers in Georgia and recovers the cost through recovery mechanisms approved by the Georgia PSC specific to Georgia's deregulated market. In addition to natural gas recovery mechanisms, there are other cost recovery mechanisms, such as regulatory riders, which vary by utility but allow recovery of certain costs, such as those related to infrastructure replacement programs as well as environmental remediation and energy efficiency plans. In traditional rate designs, utilities recover a significant portion of the fixed customer service and pipeline infrastructure costs based on assumed natural gas volumes used by customers. Three of the utilities have decoupled regulatory mechanisms that the Company believes encourage conservation by separating the recoverable amount of these fixed costs from the amounts of natural gas used by customers. Natural gas cost recovery revenues are adjusted for differences in actual recoverable natural gas costs and amounts billed in current regulated rates. Changes in the billing factor will not have a significant effect on the Company's revenues or net income, but will affect cash flows. See Note 3 to the financial statements under "Regulatory Matters" for additional information.
The following table provides regulatory information for the Company's six largest natural gas distribution utilities:
 Nicor Gas Atlanta Gas Light Elizabethtown Gas Virginia Natural Gas Florida City Gas Chattanooga Gas
Authorized ROE(a)(b)
9.80% 10.75% 9.60% 9.50% 11.25% 10.05%
Weather normalization(c)
    ü ü   ü
Decoupled, including straight-fixed-
variable rates
(d)
  ü   ü   ü
Regulatory infrastructure program
rates
(e)
ü 
 
 ü ü  
Bad debt rider(f)
ü     ü   ü
Energy efficiency plan(g)
ü   ü ü ü ü
Last decision on change in rates(h)
2018 2017 2017 2017 2004 2010
(a)Represents the authorized ROE, or the midpoint of the authorized ROE range, at December 31, 2017, except Nicor Gas which represents the authorized ROE established in the January 31, 2018 order issued by the Illinois Commission. The authorized ROE of Nicor Gas at December 31, 2017 was 10.17%. See "Base Rate Cases" herein and Note 3 to the financial statements under "Regulatory Matters – Base Rate Cases" for additional information.
(b)The authorized ROE range for Atlanta Gas Light, Virginia Natural Gas, and Florida City Gas was 10.55% - 10.95%, 9.00% - 10.00%, and 10.25% - 12.25%, respectively, at December 31, 2017.
(c)Regulatory mechanisms that allow recovery of costs in the event of unseasonal weather, but are not direct offsets to the potential impacts on earnings of weather and customer consumption. These mechanisms are designed to help stabilize operating results by increasing base rate amounts charged to customers when weather is warmer than normal and decreasing amounts charged when weather is colder than normal.
(d)Recovery of fixed customer service costs separately from assumed natural gas volumes used by customers.
(e)Programs that update or expand distribution systems and LNG facilities.
(f)The recovery (refund) of bad debt expense over (under) an established benchmark expense. Virginia Natural Gas and Chattanooga Gas recover the gas portion of bad debt expense through their purchased gas adjustment mechanisms.
(g)Recovery of costs associated with plans to achieve specified energy savings goals.
(h)See "Base Rate Cases" herein and Note 3 to the financial statements under "Regulatory Matters – Base Rate Cases" for additional information.
Infrastructure Replacement Programs and Capital Projects
The Company continues to focus on capital discipline and cost control while pursuing projects and initiatives that are expected to have current and future benefits to customers, provide an appropriate return on invested capital, and help ensure the safety and reliability of the utility infrastructure.Total capital expenditures incurred during 2017 for gas distribution operations were $1.3 billion. The following table and discussions provide updates on the infrastructure replacement programs at the natural gas distribution utilities, which are designed to update or expand the Company's distribution systems to improve reliability and meet operational flexibility and growth. The anticipated expenditures for these programs in 2018 are quantified in the discussion below.

MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS (continued)
Southern Company Gas and Subsidiary Companies 2017 Annual Report


Utility Program Program Details Recovery Expenditures in 2017 Expenditures Since Project Inception Miles of Pipe
Installed Since
Project Inception
 Scope of
Program
 Program Duration Last
Year of Program
        (in millions)   (miles) (years)  
Nicor Gas Investing in Illinois 
(a)(b) 
 Rider $336
 $907
 516
 800
 9
 2023
Atlanta Gas Light Integrated Vintage Plastic Replacement Program
(i-VPR)
 
(c)(i) 
 Base Rates 50
 251
 782
 756
 4
 2017
Atlanta Gas Light Integrated System Reinforcement Program
(i-SRP)
 
(g)(i) 
 Base Rates 76
 446
 n/a
 n/a
 8
 2017
Atlanta Gas Light Integrated Customer Growth Program
(i-CGP)
 
(h)(i) 
 Base Rates 18
 89
 n/a
 n/a
 8
 2017
Chattanooga Gas Bare Steel & Cast Iron 
(e) 
 Base Rates 3
 43
 94
 111
 10
 2020
Florida City Gas Safety, Access and Facility Enhancement Program (SAFE) 
(d) 
 Rider 10
 21
 64
 250
 10
 2025
Florida City Gas Galvanized Replacement Program 
(f) 
 Base Rates 
 16
 80
 111
 17
 2017
Virginia Natural Gas Steps to Advance Virginia's Energy (SAVE and SAVE II) 
(a) 
 Rider 34
 156
 255
 496
 10
 2021
Elizabethtown Gas Aging Infrastructure Replacement (AIR) 
(e) 
 Base Rates 16
 115
 96
 130
 4
 2017
Total       $543
 $2,044
 1,887
 2,654
    
(a)Replacement of cast iron, bare steel, mid-vintage plastic, and risk-based materials.
(b)Represents expenditures on qualifying infrastructure placed into service after December 9, 2014.
(c)Replacement of early vintage plastic, risk-based mid-vintage plastic, and mid-vintage neighborhood convenience.
(d)Replacement of four-inch and smaller mains, associated service lines, and in some instances above-ground facilities associated with rear-lot easements.
(e)Replacement of cast iron and bare steel pipes.
(f)Replacement of galvanized and X-Tube steel pipes. Reflects expenditures and miles of pipe installed since the Company acquired Florida City Gas in 2004.
(g)Installation of large diameter pressure improvement and system reinforcement projects.
(h)Installation of new business construction and strategic line extension.
(i)Recovery of the related program costs was incorporated in Atlanta Gas Light's petition for GRAM, which the Georgia PSC approved on February 21, 2017. See "Base Rate Cases" herein and Note 3 to the financial statements under "Regulatory Matters – Base Rate Cases" for additional information.
Nicor Gas
In 2013, Illinois enacted legislation that allows Nicor Gas to provide more widespread safety and reliability enhancements to its distribution system. The legislation stipulates that rate increases to customers as a result of any infrastructure investments shall not exceed a cumulative annual average of 4.0% or, in any given year, 5.5% of base rate revenues. In 2014, the Illinois

MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS (continued)
Southern Company Gas and Subsidiary Companies 2017 Annual Report


Commission approved the nine-year regulatory infrastructure program, Investing in Illinois, under which Nicor Gas implemented rates that became effective in March 2015. Nicor Gas expects to place into service $350 million of qualifying projects under Investing in Illinois in 2018.
Investing in Illinois is subject to annual review by the Illinois Commission. In conjunction with the base rate case order issued by the Illinois Commission on January 31, 2018, Nicor Gas is recovering the portion of these program costs incurred prior to December 31, 2017 through base rates. See "Base Rate Cases" herein for additional information.
Atlanta Gas Light
Atlanta Gas Light's STRIDE program, which was initially approved by the Georgia PSC in 2009, is comprised of i-SRP, i-CGP, and i-VPR, and consists of infrastructure development, enhancement, and replacement programs that are used to update and expand distribution systems and LNG facilities, improve system reliability, and meet operational flexibility and growth. For 2017 and subsequent years, the recovery of and return on current and future capital investments under the STRIDE program are included in the annual base rate revenue adjustment under GRAM.
The i-CGP program authorized Atlanta Gas Light to spend $91 million through 2017 on projects to extend its pipeline facilities to serve customers in areas without pipeline access and create new economic development opportunities in Georgia. This program ended in 2017 and was replaced with a tariff to provide up to $15 million annually for Atlanta Gas Light to commit to strategic economic development projects.
The i-SRP program authorized $445 million of capital spending through 2017 for projects to upgrade Atlanta Gas Light's distribution system and LNG facilities in Georgia, improve its peak-day system reliability and operational flexibility, and create a platform to meet long-term forecasted growth. In August 2016, Atlanta Gas Light filed a petition with the Georgia PSC for approval of a four-year extension of its i-SRP seeking approval to invest an additional $177 million to improve and upgrade its core gas distribution system in years 2017 through 2020.
The i-VPR program authorized Atlanta Gas Light to spend $275 million through 2017 to replace 756 miles of aging plastic pipe that was installed primarily in the mid-1960s to the early 1980s. Atlanta Gas Light has identified approximately 3,300 miles of vintage plastic mains in its system that should be considered for potential replacement.
See "Base Rate Cases" herein for additional information on GRAM.
Elizabethtown Gas
Elizabethtown Gas' 2013 extension of the AIR enhanced infrastructure program allowed for infrastructure investment of $115 million over four years and was focused on the replacement of aging cast iron in its pipeline system. Carrying charges on the additional capital spend are being accrued and deferred for regulatory purposes at a weighted average cost of capital of 6.65%. Effective July 1, 2017, investments under this program, which ended September 30, 2017, are being recovered through base rate revenues. See "Base Rate Cases" herein for additional information.
In 2015, Elizabethtown Gas filed the Safety, Modernization and Reliability Tariff plan with the New Jersey BPU seeking approval to invest more than $1.1 billion to replace 630 miles of vintage cast iron, steel, and copper pipeline, as well as 240 regulator stations. During the first quarter 2018, Elizabethtown Gas withdrew this filing in response to a proposed rule by the New Jersey BPU to incentivize utilities to accelerate investment in infrastructure replacement programs that enhance reliability, resiliency, and/or safety of the distribution system. Elizabethtown Gas expects to file a revised plan during the second half of 2018. The ultimate outcome of this matter cannot be determined at this time.
Virginia Natural Gas
In 2012, the Virginia Commission approved the SAVE program, an accelerated infrastructure replacement program, to be completed over a five-year period. This program included a maximum allowance for capital expenditures of $25 million per year, not to exceed $105 million in total.
In March 2016, the Virginia Commission approved an extension to the SAVE program for Virginia Natural Gas to replace more than 200 miles of aging pipeline infrastructure and invest up to $30 million in 2016 and up to $35 million annually through 2021. Virginia Natural Gas expects to invest $35 million under this program in 2018.
The SAVE program is subject to annual review by the Virginia Commission. In conjunction with the base rate case order issued by the Virginia Commission on December 21, 2017, Virginia Natural Gas is recovering the portion of these program costs incurred prior to September 1, 2017 through base rates. See "Base Rate Cases" herein for additional information.

MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS (continued)
Southern Company Gas and Subsidiary Companies 2017 Annual Report


Florida City Gas
In 2015, the Florida PSC approved Florida City Gas' SAFE, under which costs incurred for replacing aging pipes are recovered through a rate rider with annual adjustments and true-ups. Under the program, Florida City Gas is authorized to spend $105 million over a 10-year period on infrastructure relocation and enhancement projects. Florida City Gas expects to invest $10 million under this program in 2018.
PRP Settlement
In 2015, Atlanta Gas Light received a final order from the Georgia PSC for a rate true-up of allowed unrecovered revenue through 2014 related to its PRP. This order allows Atlanta Gas Light to recover $144 million of the $178 million previously unrecovered program revenue. The remaining $34 million requested related primarily to previously unrecognized ratemaking amounts and did not have a material impact on the Company's financial statements. The Company also recognized $1 million of interest expense and $5 million in operations and maintenance expense related to the PRP on the Company's statements of income for the predecessor year ended December 31, 2015. See "Unrecognized Ratemaking Amounts" herein for additional information.
As a result of the PRP settlement, Atlanta Gas Light began recovering incremental PRP surcharge amounts through three phased in increases in addition to its already existing PRP surcharge amount, which was established to address recovery of the unrecovered PRP balance of $144 million in 2015 and the estimated amounts to be earned under the program through 2025. The initial incremental surcharge of approximately $15 million annually was effective in October 2015, with additional annual increases of approximately $15 million in each of October 2016 and 2017. The final increase scheduled for October 2017 was included in the implementation of GRAM in March 2017. The under recovered balance is the result of the continued revenue requirement earned under the program offset by the existing and incremental PRP surcharges. The unrecovered balance at December 31, 2017 was $187 million, including $104 million of unrecognized equity return. The PRP surcharge will remain in effect until the earlier of the full recovery of the under recovered amount or December 31, 2025. See "Base Rate Cases" herein for additional information on GRAM.
One of the capital projects under the PRP experienced construction issues and Atlanta Gas Light was required to complete mitigation work prior to placing it in service. These mitigation costs will be included in future base rates in 2018. Provisions in the order resulted in the recognition of $5 million in operations and maintenance expense for the predecessor year ended December 31, 2015 on the Company's statements of income. In 2017, Atlanta Gas Light recovered $20 million from the settlement of contractor litigation claims and continues to pursue contractual and legal claims against a third-party contractor. Mitigation costs recovered through the legal process are retained by Atlanta Gas Light. The ultimate outcome of this matter cannot be determined at this time.
Base Rate Cases
Settled Base Rate Cases
On February 21, 2017, the Georgia PSC approved GRAM and a $20 million increase in annual base rate revenues for Atlanta Gas Light, effective March 1, 2017. GRAM adjusts base rates annually, up or down, using an earnings band based on the previously approved ROE of 10.75% and does not collect revenue through special riders and surcharges. Atlanta Gas Light adjusts rates up to the lower end of the band of 10.55% and adjusts rates down to the higher end of the band of 10.95%. Various infrastructure programs previously authorized by the Georgia PSC under Atlanta Gas Light's STRIDE program, which include i-VPR and i-SRP, will continue under GRAM and the recovery of and return on the infrastructure program investments will be included in annual base rate adjustments. The Georgia PSC will review Atlanta Gas Light's performance annually under GRAM.
Pursuant to the GRAM approval, Atlanta Gas Light and the staff of the Georgia PSC agreed to a variation to the i-CGP that was formerly part of Atlanta Gas Light's STRIDE program. As a result, a new tariff was created, effective October 10, 2017, to provide up to $15 million annually for Atlanta Gas Light to commit to strategic economic development projects. Projects under this tariff must be approved by the Georgia PSC.
Beginning with the next rate adjustment in June 2018, Atlanta Gas Light's recovery of the previously unrecovered Pipeline Replacement Program revenue through 2014, as well as the mitigation costs associated with the Pipeline Replacement Program that were not previously included in its rates, will also be included in GRAM. In connection with the GRAM approval, the last monthly Pipeline Replacement Program surcharge increase became effective March 1, 2017.
On June 30, 2017, the New Jersey BPU approved a settlement that provides for a $13 million increase in annual base rate revenues, effective July 1, 2017, based on a ROE of 9.6%. Also included in the settlement was a new composite depreciation rate that is expected to result in a $3 million annual reduction of depreciation. See Note 11 to the financial statements under "Proposed Sale of Elizabethtown Gas and Elkton Gas" for information on the proposed sale of Elizabethtown Gas.

MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS (continued)
Southern Company Gas and Subsidiary Companies 2017 Annual Report


On December 21, 2017, the Virginia Commission approved a settlement for a $34 million increase in annual base rate revenues, effective September 1, 2017, including $13 million related to the recovery of investments under the SAVE program. See "Infrastructure Replacement Programs and Capital Projects" herein for additional information. An authorized ROE range of 9.0% to 10.0% with a midpoint of 9.5% will be used to determine the revenue requirement in any filing, other than for a change in base rates.
On January 31, 2018, the Illinois Commission approved a $137 million increase in annual base rate revenues, including $93 million related to the recovery of investments under the Investing in Illinois program, effective February 8, 2018, based on a ROE of 9.8%.
Pending Base Rate Cases
On October 23, 2017, Florida City Gas filed a general base rate case with the Florida PSC requesting a $19 million increase in annual base rate revenues. On January 29, 2018, Florida City Gas filed an update to incorporate the effects of the Tax Reform Legislation that, if approved, would reduce the requested base rate revenues by $4 million. The requested increase is based on a 2018 projected test year and a ROE of 11.25%. The requested increase includes $3 million related to the recovery of investments under SAFE that are currently being recovered through a surcharge. Additionally, Florida City Gas requested an interim rate increase of $5 million annually that was approved and became effective January 12, 2018, subject to refund. The Florida PSC is expected to rule on the requested increase in mid-2018.
On December 1, 2017, Atlanta Gas Light filed its 2018 annual rate adjustment with the Georgia PSC. If approved, annual base rate revenues will increase by $22 million, effective June 1, 2018. Atlanta Gas Light will file a revised rate adjustment to incorporate the effects of the Tax Reform Legislation in the first quarter 2018. The Georgia PSC is expected to rule on the revised requested increase in the second quarter 2018.
On February 15, 2018, Chattanooga Gas filed a general base rate case with the Tennessee Public Utility Commission requesting a $7 million increase in annual base rate revenues. The requested increase, which incorporated the effects of the Tax Reform Legislation, was based on a projected test year ending June 30, 2019 and a ROE of 11.25%. The Tennessee Public Utility Commission is expected to rule on the requested increase in the third quarter 2018.
The ultimate outcome of these pending base rate cases cannot be determined at this time.
Other
The New Jersey BPU, Virginia Commission, Tennessee Public Utility Commission, and Maryland PSC each issued an order effective January 1, 2018 that requires utilities in their respective states to track as a regulatory liability the impact of the Tax Reform Legislation, including the reduction in the corporate income tax rate to 21% and the impact of excess deferred income taxes. The New Jersey BPU's order requires Elizabethtown Gas to file by March 2, 2018 proposed revised base rates with an April 1, 2018 interim effective date and a July 1, 2018 final effective date. Virginia Natural Gas will address the Virginia Commission's order in its Annual Information Filing, which will be filed by July 1, 2018. The Tennessee Public Utility Commission's order required Chattanooga Gas to file proposals to reduce rates or make other ratemaking adjustments to account for the impact of the Tax Reform Legislation. Chattanooga Gas made the required filing as part of its February 15, 2018 general base rate case filing. The Maryland PSC's order required Elkton Gas to file an explanation of the impact of the Tax Reform Legislation on its expenses and revenues, as well as when and how it expects to pass through to its customers those effects. Elkton Gas made the required filing on February 15, 2018 and will reduce annual base rates by $0.1 million effective April 1, 2018. Credits will be issued to customers for the impact of the Tax Reform Legislation from January 2018 through March 2018.
The Illinois Commission issued an order effective January 25, 2018 that requires utilities in the state to record the impacts of the Tax Reform Legislation, including the reduction in the corporate income tax rate to 21% and the impact of excess deferred income taxes, as a regulatory liability. On February 20, 2018, the Illinois Commission granted Nicor Gas' application for rehearing to file revised base rates and tariffs, which Nicor Gas expects to file by the end of the second quarter 2018.
The ultimate outcome of these matters cannot be determined at this time.
Asset Management Agreements
All of the natural gas distribution utilities except Nicor Gas use asset management agreements with the Company's wholly-owned subsidiary, Sequent, for the primary purpose of reducing utility customers' gas cost recovery rates through payments to the utilities by Sequent. For Atlanta Gas Light, these payments are controlled by the Georgia PSC and are utilized for infrastructure improvements and to fund heating assistance programs, rather than as a reduction to gas cost recovery rates. Under these asset management agreements, Sequent supplies natural gas to the utility and markets available pipeline and storage capacity to improve the overall cost of supplying gas to the utility customers. Currently, the Company's utilities primarily purchase their gas

MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS (continued)
Southern Company Gas and Subsidiary Companies 2017 Annual Report


from Sequent. The purchase agreements require Sequent to provide firm gas to the natural gas distribution utilities, but these natural gas distribution utilities maintain the right and ability to make their own long-term supply arrangements if they believe it is in the best interest of their customers.
Each agreement provides for Sequent to make payments to the natural gas distribution utilities through either an annual minimum guarantee within a profit sharing structure, a profit sharing structure without an annual minimum guarantee, or a fixed fee. From the inception of these agreements in 2001 through December 31, 2017, Sequent made sharing payments to the natural gas distribution utilities under these agreements totaling $390 million.
The following table provides payments made by Sequent to the natural gas distribution utilities under these agreements during the last three years:
  Successor  Predecessor  
  Total Amount Received  Total Amount Received 
  Year Ended December 31, July 1, 2016 through December 31,  January 1, 2016 through June 30, Year Ended December 31, 
  2017 2016  2016 2015 Expiration Date
  (in millions)  (in millions) 
Elizabethtown Gas $11
 $3
  $12
 $28
 March 2019
Virginia Natural Gas 6
 2
  9
 15
 March 2019
Atlanta Gas Light 4
 1
  6
 15
 March 2020
Florida City Gas 1
 
  1
 1
 
(a) 
Chattanooga Gas 1
 
  1
 1
 March 2021
Total(b)
 $23
 $6
  $29
 $60
  
(a)The agreement renews automatically each year unless terminated by either party.
(b)Payments made to Elkton Gas were less than $1 million for each of the periods presented.
Upon consummation of the asset sales of Elizabethtown Gas and Elkton Gas, South Jersey Industries, Inc. will assume the asset management agreements of Elizabethtown Gas and Elkton Gas. See Note 11 to the financial statements under "Proposed Sale of Elizabethtown Gas and Elkton Gas" for additional information on these sales.
energySMART
In 2014, the Illinois Commission approved Nicor Gas' energySMART through 2017, which outlined energy efficiency program offerings and therm reduction goals, and subsequently extended the program to 2021. Through December 31, 2017, Nicor Gas spent $107 million of the initial authorized expenditure of $113 million. A new four-year program began on January 1, 2018, with an additional authorized expenditure of $160 million. Nicor Gas expects to invest $40 million under this program in 2018.
Unrecognized Ratemaking Amounts
The following table illustrates the Company's authorized ratemaking amounts that are not recognized on its balance sheets. These amounts are primarily composed of an allowed equity rate of return on assets associated with certain of the Company's regulatory infrastructure programs. These amounts will be recognized as revenues in the Company's financial statements in the periods they are billable to customers, the majority of which will be recovered by 2025.
 December 31, 2017 December 31, 2016
 (in millions)
Atlanta Gas Light$104
 $110
Virginia Natural Gas11
 11
Elizabethtown Gas(*)
8
 6
Nicor Gas2
 2
Total$125
 $129
(*)See Note 11 to the financial statements under "Proposed Sale of Elizabethtown Gas and Elkton Gas" for information on the pending asset sale.

MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS (continued)
Southern Company Gas and Subsidiary Companies 2017 Annual Report


Income Tax Matters
Federal Tax Reform Legislation
On December 22, 2017, the Tax Reform Legislation was signed into law and became effective on January 1, 2018. The Tax Reform Legislation, among other things, reduces the federal corporate income tax rate to 21%, retains normalization provisions for public utility property and existing renewable energy incentives, and repeals the corporate alternative minimum tax.
For businesses other than regulated utilities, the Tax Reform Legislation allows 100% bonus depreciation of qualified property acquired and placed in service between September 28, 2017 and January 1, 2023 and phases down by 20% each year until completely phased out for qualified property placed in service after December 31, 2027. Further, the business interest deduction is limited to 30% of taxable income excluding interest, net operating loss (NOL) carryforwards, and depreciation and amortization through December 31, 2021 and thereafter to 30% of taxable income excluding interest and NOL carryforwards.
Regulated utility businesses, including the natural gas distribution companies, can continue deducting all business interest expense and are not eligible for bonus depreciation on capital assets acquired and placed in service after September 27, 2017. Projects with binding contracts before September 28, 2017 and placed in service after September 27, 2017 remain eligible for bonus depreciation under the Protecting Americans from Tax Hikes (PATH) Act.
In addition, under the the Tax Reform Legislation, NOLs generated after December 31, 2017 can no longer be carried back to previous tax years but can be carried forward indefinitely, with utilization limited to 80% of taxable income of the subsequent tax year.
For the year ended December 31, 2017, implementation of the Tax Reform Legislation resulted in an estimated net tax expense of $93 million and a $777 million increase in regulatory liabilities, primarily due to the impact of the reduction of the corporate income tax rate on deferred tax assets and liabilities.
The Tax Reform Legislation is subject to further interpretation and guidance from the IRS, as well as each respective state's adoption. In addition, the regulatory treatment of certain impacts of Tax Reform Legislation is subject to the discretion of the FERC and the relevant state regulatory bodies as further described in Note 3 to the financial statements under "Base Rate Cases" and "Other" for additional information.
See FINANCIAL CONDITION AND LIQUIDITY – "Credit Rating Risk" herein and Note 5 to the financial statements under "Current and Deferred Income Taxes" for additional information.
The ultimate outcome of these matters cannot be determined at this time.
Bonus Depreciation
Under the Tax Reform Legislation, projects with binding contracts prior to September 28, 2017 and placed in service after September 27, 2017 remain eligible for bonus depreciation under the PATH Act. The PATH Act allowed for 50% bonus depreciation for 2015 through 2017, 40% bonus depreciation for 2018, and 30% bonus depreciation for 2019 and certain long-lived assets placed in service in 2020. Based on provisional estimates, bonus depreciation is expected to result in positive cash flows of approximately $200 million for the 2017 tax year and approximately $60 million for the 2018 tax year. Should Southern Company have a NOL in 2018, all of these cash flows may not be fully realized in 2018. See Note 5 to the financial statements under "Current and Deferred Income Taxes" for additional information. The ultimate outcome of this matter cannot be determined at this time.
State Tax Reform Legislation
On July 6, 2017, the State of Illinois enacted tax legislation that repealed its non-combination tax rule and increased the effective corporate income tax rate from 5.25% to 7.0% (making the total corporate tax rate 9.5% when combined with the 2.5% personal property replacement tax) effective July 1, 2017. In addition to increasing taxes on future earnings, this legislation required the Company to increase accumulated deferred income tax liabilities by $24 million during the third quarter 2017 to reflect these changes, of which $15 million was expensed and $9 million was recorded as a regulatory asset.
Change in State Apportionment Factors
Southern Company calculated new apportionment factors in several states to include the Company in its consolidated tax filings, which resulted in $22 million of additional deferred income tax expenses in the successor year ended December 31, 2017.

MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS (continued)
Southern Company Gas and Subsidiary Companies 2017 Annual Report


Other Matters
The Company is involved in various other matters being litigated and regulatory matters that could affect future earnings. In addition, the Company is subject to certain claims and legal actions arising in the ordinary course of business.
Nicor Gas and Nicor Energy Services Company, wholly-owned subsidiaries of the Company, and Nicor Inc. were defendants in a putative class action initially filed in 2011 in the state court in Cook County, Illinois. The plaintiffs purported to represent a class of the customers who purchased the Gas Line Comfort Guard product from Nicor Energy Services Company and variously alleged that the marketing, sale, and billing of the Gas Line Comfort Guard product violated the Illinois Consumer Fraud and Deceptive Business Practices Act, constituting common law fraud and resulting in unjust enrichment of these entities. The plaintiffs sought, on behalf of the classes they purported to represent, actual and punitive damages, interest, costs, attorney fees, and injunctive relief. On February 8, 2017, the judge denied the plaintiffs' motion for class certification and the Company's motion for summary judgment. On March 7, 2017, the parties reached a settlement, which was finalized and effective on April 3, 2017. The settlement did not have a material impact on the Company's financial statements.
The Company is assessing its alleged involvement in an incident that occurred in one of its service territories that resulted in several deaths, injuries, and property damage. One of the natural gas distribution utilities has been named as one of the defendants in several lawsuits related to this incident. The Company has insurance that provides full coverage of any financial exposure in excess of $11 million per incident. During the successor period ended December 31, 2016 and the predecessor period ended December 31, 2015, the Company recorded reserves for substantially all of its potential exposure from these cases.
The ultimate outcome of these matters and such pending or potential litigation or regulatory matters cannot be predicted at this time; however, for current proceedings not specifically reported herein or in Note 3 to the financial statements, management does not anticipate that the ultimate liabilities, if any, arising from such current proceedings would have a material effect on the Company's financial statements. See Note 3 to the financial statements under "General Litigation Matters" for a discussion of various other contingencies, regulatory matters, and other matters being litigated which may affect future earnings potential.
The Company owns a 50% interest in a planned LNG liquefaction and storage facility in Jacksonville, Florida. Once construction is complete and the facility is operational, it will be outfitted with a 2.0 million gallon storage tank with the capacity to produce in excess of 120,000 gallons of LNG per day. It is expected to be operational in the first half of 2018. The ultimate outcome of this matter cannot be determined at this time.
A wholly-owned subsidiary of the Company owns and operates a natural gas storage facility consisting of two salt dome caverns in Louisiana. Periodic integrity tests are required in accordance with rules of the Louisiana Department of Natural Resources (DNR). In August 2017, in connection with an ongoing integrity project, updated seismic mapping indicated the proximity of one of the caverns to the edge of the salt dome may be less than the required minimum and could result in the Company retiring the cavern early. At December 31, 2017, the facility's property, plant, and equipment had a net book value of $112 million, of which the cavern itself represents approximately 20%. A potential early retirement of this cavern is dependent upon several factors including compliance with an order from the Louisiana DNR detailing the requirements to place the cavern back in service, which includes, among other things, obtaining core samples to determine the composition of the sheath surrounding the edge of the salt dome.
The cavern continues to maintain its pressures and overall structural integrity. The Company intends to monitor the cavern and comply with the Louisiana DNR order through 2020 and place the cavern back in service in 2021. These events were considered in connection with the Company's annual long-lived asset impairment analysis, which determined there was no impairment as of December 31, 2017. Any changes in results of monitoring activities, rates at which expiring capacity contracts are re-contracted, timing of placing the cavern back in service, or Louisiana DNR requirements could trigger impairment. Further, early retirement of the cavern could trigger impairment of other long-lived assets associated with the natural gas storage facility. The ultimate outcome of this matter cannot be determined at this time, but could have a material impact on the Company's financial statements.
Effective January 1, 2018, the Company conformed its paid time off policy to align with Southern Company. Under the new policy, paid time off days are vested by the employee on the first day of each year and will continue to be recovered through rates on an as-paid basis. As a result, the Company accrued $21 million as of January 1, 2018, of which $9 million was recorded as a regulatory asset.
ACCOUNTING POLICIES
Application of Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates
The Company prepares its financial statements in accordance with GAAP. Significant accounting policies are described in Note 1 to the financial statements. In the application of these policies, certain estimates are made that may have a material impact on the

MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS (continued)
Southern Company Gas and Subsidiary Companies 2017 Annual Report


Company's results of operations and related disclosures. Different assumptions and measurements could produce estimates that are significantly different from those recorded in the financial statements. Senior management has reviewed and discussed the following critical accounting policies and estimates with the Audit Committee of Southern Company's Board of Directors.
Utility Regulation
The natural gas distribution utilities comprised approximately 82% of the Company's total operating revenues for 2017 and are subject to rate regulation by their respective state regulatory agencies, which set the rates utilities are permitted to charge customers based on allowable costs, including a reasonable ROE. As a result, the natural gas distribution utilities apply accounting standards which require the financial statements to reflect the effects of rate regulation. Through the ratemaking process, the regulators may require the inclusion of costs or revenues in periods different than when they would be recognized by a non-regulated company. This treatment may result in the deferral of expenses and the recording of related regulatory assets based on anticipated future recovery through rates or the deferral of gains or creation of liabilities and the recording of related regulatory liabilities. The application of the accounting standards has a further effect on the Company's financial statements as a result of the estimates of allowable costs used in the ratemaking process. These estimates may differ from those actually incurred by the natural gas distribution utilities; therefore, the accounting estimates inherent in specific costs such as depreciation and pension and other postretirement benefits have less of a direct impact on the Company's results of operations and financial condition than they would on a non-regulated company.
As reflected in Note 1 to the financial statements, significant regulatory assets and liabilities have been recorded. Management reviews the ultimate recoverability of these regulatory assets and any requirement to refund these regulatory liabilities based on applicable regulatory guidelines and GAAP. However, adverse legislative, judicial, or regulatory actions could materially impact the amounts of such regulatory assets and liabilities and could adversely impact the Company's financial statements.
Accounting for Income Taxes
The consolidated income tax provision and deferred income tax assets and liabilities, as well as any unrecognized tax benefits and valuation allowances, require significant judgment and estimates. These estimates are supported by historical tax return data, reasonable projections of taxable income and interpretations of applicable tax laws and regulations across multiple taxing jurisdictions. The effective tax rate reflects the statutory tax rates and calculated apportionments for the many states in which the Company operates.
On behalf of the Company, Southern Company files a consolidated federal income tax return and various state income tax returns, some of which are combined or unitary. Under a joint consolidated income tax allocation agreement, each Southern Company subsidiary's current and deferred tax expense is computed on a stand-alone basis and no subsidiary is allocated more current expense than would be paid if it filed a separate income tax return. Certain deductions and credits can be limited at the consolidated or combined level resulting in NOL and tax credit carryforwards that would not otherwise result on a stand-alone basis. Utilization of NOL carryforwards and the assessment of valuation allowances are based on significant judgment and extensive analysis of the Company's, as well as Southern Company's, current financial position and result of operations, including currently available information about future years, to estimate when future taxable income will be realized.
Current and deferred state income tax liabilities and assets are estimated based on laws of multiple states that determine the income to be apportioned to their jurisdictions. States utilize various formulas to calculate the apportionment of taxable income, primarily using sales, assets or payroll within the jurisdiction compared to the consolidated totals. In addition, each state varies as to whether a stand-alone, combined or unitary filing methodology is required. The calculation of deferred state taxes considers apportionment factors and filing methodologies that are expected to apply in future years. The apportionments and methodologies which are ultimately finalized in a manner inconsistent with expectations could have a material effect on the Company's financial statements.
Given the significant judgment involved in estimating NOL carryforwards and tax credit carryforwards and multi-state apportionments, the Company considers state deferred income tax liabilities and assets to be critical accounting estimates.
Federal Tax Reform Legislation
Following the enactment of the Tax Reform Legislation, the SEC staff issued Staff Accounting Bulletin 118 – "Income Tax Accounting Implications of the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act" (SAB 118), which provides for a measurement period of up to one year from the enactment date to complete accounting under GAAP for the tax effects of the legislation. Due to the complex and comprehensive nature of the enacted tax law changes, and their application under GAAP, the Company considers all amounts recorded in the financial statements as a result of the Tax Reform Legislation to be "provisional" as discussed in SAB 118 and subject to revision. The Company is awaiting additional guidance from industry and income tax authorities in order to finalize its

MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS (continued)
Southern Company Gas and Subsidiary Companies 2017 Annual Report


accounting. The ultimate impact of the Tax Reform Legislation on deferred income tax assets and liabilities and the related regulatory liabilities cannot be determined at this time. See "Income Tax MattersFederal Tax Reform Legislation" herein and Note 3 to the financial statements under "Base Rate Cases" and "Other" and Note 5 to the financial statements under "Current and Deferred Income Taxes" for additional information.
Assessment of Assets
Goodwill
The Company does not amortize its goodwill, but tests it annually for impairment at the reporting unit level during the fourth quarter or more frequently if impairment indicators arise. These indicators include, but are not limited to, a significant change in operating performance, the business climate, legal or regulatory factors, or a planned sale or disposition of a significant portion of the business. A reporting unit is the operating segment, or a business one level below the operating segment (a component), if discrete financial information is prepared and regularly reviewed by management. Components are aggregated if they have similar economic characteristics.
As part of the Company's impairment test, the Company may perform an initial qualitative Step 0 assessment to determine whether it is more likely than not that the fair value of each reporting unit is less than its carrying amount before applying the two-step, quantitative goodwill impairment test. If the Company elects to perform the qualitative assessment, it evaluates relevant events and circumstances, including but not limited to, macroeconomic conditions, industry and market conditions, cost factors, financial performance, entity specific events, and events specific to each reporting unit. If the Company determines that it is more likely than not that the fair value of a reporting unit is less than its carrying amount, or it elects not to perform a qualitative assessment, it performs the two-step goodwill impairment test.
Step 1 of the two-step goodwill impairment test compares the fair value of the reporting unit to its carrying value. If the result of the Step 1 test reveals that the estimated fair value is below its carrying value, the Company proceeds with Step 2.
Step 2 of the two-step goodwill impairment test compares the implied fair value of goodwill, which is calculated as the residual amount from the reporting unit's overall fair value after assigning fair values to its assets and liabilities under a hypothetical purchase price allocation as if the reporting unit had been acquired in a business combination, to its carrying value. Based on the result of the Step 2 test, the Company records a goodwill impairment charge for any excess of carrying value over the implied fair value of goodwill.
For the 2017 annual impairment test, the Company performed Step 1 of the two-step impairment test, which resulted in the fair value of all of its reporting units that have goodwill exceeding their carrying value. For the 2016 and 2015 annual impairment tests, the Company performed the qualitative Step 0 assessment and determined that it was more likely than not that the fair value of all of its reporting units with goodwill exceeded their carrying amounts, and therefore no quantitative analysis was required. In the third quarter 2015, the Company identified potential impairment indicators and performed an interim impairment test for its storage and fuels reporting unit, which resulted in impairment of the full $14 million goodwill balance for that reporting unit.
As the determination of an asset's fair value and useful life involves management making certain estimates and because these estimates form the basis for the determination of whether or not an impairment charge should be recorded, the Company considers these estimates to be critical accounting estimates.
See "Recently Issued Accounting Standards – Other" herein for information on the Company's adoption of ASU No. 2017-04 effective January 1, 2018.
Long-Lived Assets
The Company depreciates or amortizes its long-lived and intangible assets over their estimated useful lives. The Company assesses its long-lived and intangible assets for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that an asset's carrying amount may not be recoverable. When such events or circumstances are present, the Company assesses the recoverability of long-lived assets by determining whether the carrying value will be recovered through the expected future cash flows. Impairment is indicated if the carrying amount of a long-lived asset exceeds the sum of the undiscounted future cash flows expected to result from the use and eventual disposition of the asset. If impairment is indicated, the Company records an impairment loss equal to the difference between the carrying value and the fair value of the long-lived asset.
As the determination of the expected future cash flows generated from an asset, an asset's fair value, and useful life involves management making certain estimates and because these estimates form the basis for the determination of whether or not an impairment charge should be recorded, the Company considers these estimates to be critical accounting estimates.

MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS (continued)
Southern Company Gas and Subsidiary Companies 2017 Annual Report


Derivatives and Hedging Activities
Determining whether a contract meets the definition of a derivative instrument, contains an embedded derivative requiring bifurcation, or qualifies for hedge accounting treatment is voluminous and complex. The treatment of a single contract may vary from period to period depending upon accounting elections, changes in the Company's assessment of the likelihood of future hedged transactions, or new interpretations of accounting guidance. As a result, judgment is required in determining the appropriate accounting treatment. In addition, the estimated fair value of derivative instruments may change significantly from period to period depending upon market conditions, and changes in hedge effectiveness may impact the accounting treatment.
Derivative instruments (including certain derivative instruments embedded in other contracts) are recorded on the balance sheets as either assets or liabilities measured at their fair value. If the transaction qualifies for, and is designated as, a normal purchase or normal sale, it is exempted from fair value accounting treatment and is, instead, subject to traditional accrual accounting. The Company utilizes market data or assumptions that market participants would use in pricing the derivative asset or liability, including assumptions about risk and the risks inherent in the inputs of the valuation technique.
Changes in the derivatives' fair value are recognized concurrently in earnings unless specific hedge accounting criteria are met. If the derivatives meet those criteria, derivative gains and losses offset related results of the hedged item in the income statement in the case of a fair value hedge, or gains and losses are recorded in OCI on the balance sheets until the hedged transaction affects earnings in the case of a cash flow hedge. Additionally, a company is required to formally designate a derivative as a hedge as well as document and assess the effectiveness of derivatives associated with transactions that receive hedge accounting treatment.
Nicor Gas and Elizabethtown Gas utilize derivative instruments to hedge the price risk for the purchase of natural gas for customers. These derivatives are reflected at fair value and are not designated as accounting hedges. Realized gains or losses on such instruments are included in the cost of gas delivered and are passed through directly to customers, subject to review by the applicable state regulatory agencies, and therefore have no direct impact on earnings. Unrealized changes in the fair value of these derivative instruments are deferred as regulatory assets or liabilities.
The Company uses derivative instruments primarily to reduce the impact to its results of operations due to the risk of changes in the price of natural gas and to a lesser extent the Company hedges against warmer-than-normal weather and interest rates. The fair value of natural gas derivative instruments used to manage exposure to changing natural gas prices reflects the estimated amounts that the Company would receive or pay to terminate or close the contracts at the reporting date, taking into account the current unrealized gains or losses on open contracts. For derivatives utilized at gas marketing services and wholesale gas services that are not designated as accounting hedges, changes in fair value are reported as gains or losses in the Company's results of operations in the period of change. Gas marketing services records derivative gains or losses arising from cash flow hedges in OCI and reclassifies them into earnings in the same period that the underlying hedged item is recognized in earnings.
The Company classifies derivative assets and liabilities based on the lowest level of input that is significant to the fair value measurement. The assessment of the significance of a particular input to the fair value measurement requires judgment and may affect the valuation of fair value assets and liabilities and their placement within the fair value hierarchy. The determination of the fair value of the derivative instruments incorporates various required factors. These factors include:
the creditworthiness of the counterparties involved and the impact of credit enhancements (such as cash deposits and letters of credit);
events specific to a given counterparty; and
the impact of the Company's nonperformance risk on its liabilities.
If there is a significant change in the underlying market prices or pricing assumptions the Company uses in pricing its derivative assets or liabilities, the Company may experience a significant impact on its financial position, results of operations, and cash flows. See Note 10 to the financial statements for additional information.
Given the assumptions used in pricing the derivative asset or liability, the Company considers the valuation of derivative assets and liabilities a critical accounting estimate. See FINANCIAL CONDITION AND LIQUIDITY – "Market Price Risk" herein for more information.
Pension and Other Postretirement Benefits
The Company's calculation of pension and other postretirement benefits expense is dependent on a number of assumptions. These assumptions include discount rates, healthcare cost trend rates, expected long-term return on plan assets, mortality rates, expected salary and wage increases, and other factors. Components of pension and other postretirement benefits expense include interest and service cost on the pension and other postretirement benefit plans, expected return on plan assets, and amortization of certain unrecognized costs and obligations. Actual results that differ from the assumptions utilized are accumulated and amortized over

MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS (continued)
Southern Company Gas and Subsidiary Companies 2017 Annual Report


future periods and, therefore, generally affect recognized expense and the recorded obligation in future periods. While the Company believes that the assumptions used are appropriate, differences in actual experience or significant changes in assumptions would affect its pension and other postretirement benefits costs and obligations.
Key elements in determining the Company's pension and other postretirement benefit expense are the expected long-term return on plan assets and the discount rate used to measure the benefit plan obligations and the periodic benefit plan expense for future periods. The expected long-term return on pension and other postretirement benefit plan assets is based on the Company's investment strategy, historical experience, and expectations for long-term rates of return that consider external actuarial advice. The Company determines the long-term return on plan assets by applying the long-term rate of expected returns on various asset classes to the Company's target asset allocation. For purposes of determining its liability related to the pension and other postretirement benefit plans, the Company discounts the future related cash flows using a single-point discount rate developed from the weighted average of market-observed yields for high quality fixed income securities with maturities that correspond to expected benefit payments. Prior to 2016, the Company computed the interest cost component of its net periodic pension and other postretirement benefit plan expense using the same single-point discount rate. In 2016, the Company adopted a full yield curve approach for calculating the interest cost component whereby the discount rate for each year is applied to the liability for that specific year. As a result, the interest cost component of net periodic pension and other postretirement benefit plan expense decreased by approximately $7 million in 2016.
A 25 basis point change in any significant assumption (discount rate, salaries, or long-term return on plan assets) would result in a $2 million or less change in total annual benefit expense and a $42 million or less change in projected obligations.
See Note 2 to the financial statements for additional information regarding pension and other postretirement benefits.
Contingent Obligations
The Company is subject to a number of federal and state laws and regulations as well as other factors and conditions that subject it to environmental, litigation, and other risks. See FUTURE EARNINGS POTENTIAL herein and Note 3 to the financial statements for more information regarding certain of these contingencies. The Company periodically evaluates its exposure to such risks and records reserves for those matters where a non-tax-related loss is considered probable and reasonably estimable. The adequacy of reserves can be significantly affected by external events or conditions that can be unpredictable; thus, the ultimate outcome of such matters could materially affect the Company's results of operations, cash flows, or financial condition.
Recently Issued Accounting Standards
Revenue
In 2014, the FASB issued ASC 606, Revenue from Contracts with Customers (ASC 606), replacing the existing accounting standard and industry specific guidance for revenue recognition with a five-step model for recognizing and measuring revenue from contracts with customers. The underlying principle of the new standard is to recognize revenue to depict the transfer of goods or services to customers at the amount expected to be collected. The new standard also requires enhanced disclosures regarding the nature, amount, timing, and uncertainty of revenue and the related cash flows arising from contracts with customers.
Most of the Company's revenue, including energy provided to customers, is from tariff offerings that provide natural gas without a defined contractual term, as well as longer-term contractual agreements, including non-derivative natural gas asset management and optimization arrangements.
The Company has completed the evaluation of all revenue streams and determined that the adoption of ASC 606 will not change the current timing of revenue recognition for such transactions. Some revenue arrangements, such as energy-related derivatives and alternative revenue programs, are excluded from the scope of ASC 606 and, therefore, will be accounted for and disclosed or presented separately from revenues under ASC 606 on the Company's financial statements. The Company has concluded contributions in aid of construction are not in scope for ASC 606 and will continue to be accounted for as an offset to property, plant, and equipment.
The new standard is effective for reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2017. The Company applied the modified retrospective method of adoption effective January 1, 2018. The Company also utilized practical expedients which allowed it to apply the standard to open contracts at the date of adoption and to reflect the aggregate effect of all modifications when identifying performance obligations and allocating the transaction price for contracts modified before the effective date. Under the modified retrospective method of adoption, prior year reported results are not restated; however, a cumulative-effect adjustment to retained earnings at January 1, 2018 is recorded. In addition, quarterly disclosures will include comparative information on 2018 financial statement line items under current guidance. The adoption of ASC 606 did not result in a cumulative-effect adjustment.

MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS (continued)
Southern Company Gas and Subsidiary Companies 2017 Annual Report


Leases
In February 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-02, Leases (Topic 842) (ASU 2016-02). ASU 2016-02 requires lessees to recognize on the balance sheet a lease liability and a right-of-use asset for all leases. ASU 2016-02 also changes the recognition, measurement, and presentation of expense associated with leases and provides clarification regarding the identification of certain components of contracts that would represent a lease. The accounting required by lessors is relatively unchanged. ASU 2016-02 is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2018 and the Company will adopt the new standard effective January 1, 2019.
The Company is currently implementing an information technology system along with the related changes to internal controls and accounting policies that will support the accounting for leases under ASU 2016-02. In addition, the Company has substantially completed a detailed inventory and analysis of its leases. In terms of rental charges and duration of contracts, the most significant leases relate to real estate and fleet vehicles where the Company is the lessee and to natural gas home appliances where the Company is the lessor. While the Company has not yet determined the ultimate impact, adoption of ASU 2016-02 is expected to have a significant impact on the Company's balance sheet.
Other
In November 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-18, Statement of Cash Flows (Topic 230): Restricted Cash (ASU 2016-18). ASU 2016-18 eliminates the need to reflect transfers between cash and restricted cash in operating, investing, and financing activities in the statement of cash flows. Upon adoption, the net change in cash and cash equivalents during the period will include amounts generally described as restricted cash or restricted cash equivalents. ASU 2016-18 is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2017, and will be applied retrospectively to each period presented. The Company adopted ASU 2016-18 effective January 1, 2018 with no material impact on its financial statements.
On January 26, 2017, the FASB issued ASU No. 2017-04, Intangibles – Goodwill and Other (Topic 350): Simplifying the Test for Goodwill Impairment (ASU 2017-04). ASU 2017-04 removes the requirement to compare the implied fair value of goodwill with the carrying amount as part of Step 2 of the goodwill impairment test. Under the new standard, the goodwill impairment loss will be measured as the excess of a reporting unit's carrying amount over its fair value, not exceeding the total amount of goodwill allocated to that reporting unit, which may increase the frequency of goodwill impairment charges if a future goodwill impairment test does not pass the Step 1 evaluation. ASU 2017-04 is effective prospectively for periods beginning on or after December 15, 2019, with early adoption permitted. The Company adopted ASU 2017-04 effective January 1, 2018 with no impact on its financial statements.
On March 10, 2017, the FASB issued ASU No. 2017-07, Compensation – Retirement Benefits (Topic 715): Improving the Presentation of Net Periodic Pension Cost and Net Periodic Postretirement Benefit Cost (ASU 2017-07). ASU 2017-07 requires that an employer report the service cost component in the same line item or items as other compensation costs and requires the other components of net periodic pension and postretirement benefit costs to be separately presented in the income statement outside of income from operations. Additionally, only the service cost component is eligible for capitalization, when applicable. However, all cost components remain eligible for capitalization under FERC regulations. ASU 2017-07 will be applied retrospectively for the presentation of the service cost component and the other components of net periodic pension and postretirement benefit costs in the income statement. The capitalization of only the service cost component of net periodic pension and postretirement benefit costs in assets will be applied on a prospective basis. ASU 2017-07 is effective for periods beginning after December 15, 2017. The presentation changes required for net periodic pension and postretirement benefit costs will result in a decrease in the Company's operating income and an increase in other income for 2016 and 2017 and are expected to result in a decrease in operating income and an increase in other income for 2018. The Company adopted ASU 2017-07 effective January 1, 2018 with no material impact on its financial statements.
On August 28, 2017, the FASB issued ASU No. 2017-12, Derivatives and Hedging (Topic 815): Targeted Improvements to Accounting for Hedging Activities (ASU 2017-12), amending the hedge accounting recognition and presentation requirements. ASU 2017-12 makes more financial and non-financial hedging strategies eligible for hedge accounting, amends the related presentation and disclosure requirements, and simplifies hedge effectiveness assessment requirements. ASU 2017-12 is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2018, with early adoption permitted. The Company adopted ASU 2017-12 effective January 1, 2018 with no material impact on its financial statements.

MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS (continued)
Southern Company Gas and Subsidiary Companies 2017 Annual Report


FINANCIAL CONDITION AND LIQUIDITY
Overview
The Company's financial condition remained stable at December 31, 2017. The Company's cash requirements primarily consist of funding ongoing operations, common stock dividends, capital expenditures, and debt maturities. Capital expenditures and other investing activities include investments to meet projected long-term demand requirements, to maintain existing natural gas distribution systems as well as to update and expand these systems, and to comply with environmental regulations. Operating cash flows provide a substantial portion of the Company's cash needs. For the three-year period from 2018 through 2020, the Company's projected common stock dividends, capital expenditures, and debt maturities are expected to exceed operating cash flows. The Company plans to finance future cash needs in excess of its operating cash flows primarily through external securities issuances, equity contributions from Southern Company, and borrowings from financial institutions and with proceeds from the pending asset sales of Elizabethtown Gas and Elkton Gas. The Company plans to use commercial paper to manage seasonal variations in operating cash flows and other working capital needs. The Company intends to continue to monitor its access to short-term and long-term capital markets as well as its bank credit arrangements to meet future capital and liquidity needs. See "Sources of Capital," "Financing Activities," and "Capital Requirements and Contractual Obligations" herein for additional information.
By regulation, Nicor Gas is restricted, to the extent of its retained earnings balance, in the amount it can dividend or loan to affiliates and is not permitted to make money pool loans to affiliates. The New Jersey BPU restricts the amount Elizabethtown Gas can dividend to its parent company to 70% of its quarterly net income. Additionally, as stipulated in the New Jersey BPU's order approving the Merger, the Company is prohibited from paying dividends to its parent company, Southern Company, if the Company's senior unsecured debt rating falls below investment grade. At December 31, 2017, the amount of subsidiary retained earnings and net income restricted to dividend totaled $719 million. These restrictions did not have any impact on the Company's ability to meet its cash obligations, nor does management expect such restrictions to materially impact the Company's ability to meet its currently anticipated cash obligations.
The Company's investments in the qualified pension plan increased in value at December 31, 2017 as compared to December 31, 2016. There were no voluntary contributions to the qualified pension plan in 2017 and no mandatory contributions to its qualified pension plan are anticipated during 2018. See Note 2 to the financial statements for additional information.
Net cash provided from operating activities totaled $883 million for 2017, primarily due to earnings and the timing of cash receipts for the sale of natural gas inventory and vendor payments. Net cash used for operating activities was $328 million for the successor period of July 1, 2016 through December 31, 2016, primarily due to a $125 million voluntary pension contribution, a $35 million payment for the settlement of an interest rate swap, and less cash due to the timing of collecting receivables and disbursing payables. Due to the seasonal nature of its business, the Company typically reports negative cash flows from operating activities in the second half of the year. Net cash provided from operating activities was $1.1 billion for the predecessor period of January 1, 2016 through June 30, 2016, primarily due to low volumes of natural gas sales and changes in natural gas inventory as a result of warmer weather and the timing of recovery of related gas costs and weather normalization adjustments from customers. Net cash provided from operating activities was $1.4 billion for the predecessor year ended December 31, 2015, primarily due to the timing of recovery of related gas costs from customers, cash provided from derivative financial instrument assets and liabilities, and a tax refund of $150 million related to the extension of bonus depreciation.
Net cash used for investing activities totaled $1.6 billion for 2017, which reflected $1.5 billion in capital expenditures primarily due to gross property additions for infrastructure replacement programs at gas distribution operations and $145 million in capital contributions to equity method investments in pipeline projects, partially offset by $80 million in returned capital from equity method investments in pipeline projects. Net cash used for investing activities was $2.1 billion for the successor period of July 1, 2016 through December 31, 2016, which reflected $1.4 billion primarily related to the Company's acquisition of the 50% interest in SNG, and $632 million in capital expenditures. Net cash used for investing activities was $559 million and $1.0 billion for the predecessor period of January 1, 2016 through June 30, 2016 and the predecessor year ended December 31, 2015, respectively, which primarily related to capital expenditures. See Note 4 to the financial statements under "Equity Method Investments – SNG" and Note 11 to the financial statements under "Investment in SNG" for additional information.
Net cash provided from financing activities totaled $741 million for 2017, primarily due to $850 million in debt issuances, $262 million in net additional commercial paper borrowings, and $103 million in capital contributions from Southern Company, partially offset by $443 million in common stock dividend payments to Southern Company and $22 million in repayment of long-term debt. Net cash provided from financing activities was $2.4 billion for the successor period of July 1, 2016 through December 31, 2016, which reflected $1.1 billion of capital contributions from Southern Company, primarily used to fund the

MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS (continued)
Southern Company Gas and Subsidiary Companies 2017 Annual Report


Company's investment in SNG, $1.1 billion in net additional commercial paper borrowings, partially offset by $160 million for the purchase of the 15% noncontrolling ownership interest in SouthStar, and $900 million in proceeds from debt issuances, partially offset by $420 million in debt payments. Net cash used for financing activities was $558 million for the predecessor period of January 1, 2016 through June 30, 2016, primarily due to $896 million in net repayment of commercial paper borrowings and $125 million in repayment of long-term debt, partially offset by $600 million in debt issuances. Net cash used for financing activities was $366 million for the predecessor year ended December 31, 2015, primarily due to the net repayment of commercial paper borrowings, partially offset by the proceeds from debt issuances in excess of debt repayments. See Note 4 to the financial statements under "Variable Interest Entities" and "Equity Method Investments – SNG" and Note 11 to the financial statements under "Investment in SNG" for additional information.
Significant balance sheet changes at December 31, 2017 include an increase of $1.2 billion in total property, plant, and equipment primarily due to capital expenditures for infrastructure replacement programs, an increase of $1.0 billion in deferred credits related to income taxes primarily resulting from the impacts of the Tax Reform Legislation, a decrease of $886 million in accumulated deferred income tax liabilities primarily due to the change in the federal corporate income tax rate, partially offset by tax depreciation related to infrastructure assets placed in service as well as the impact of State of Illinois tax legislation, and an increase in long-term debt of $632 million, primarily due to $450 million of senior notes issued in May 2017 and $200 million of first mortgage bonds at Nicor Gas issued in each of August 2017 and November 2017. Other significant balance sheet changes include an increase of $261 million in notes payable primarily related to an increase in commercial paper borrowings of $510 million at Southern Company Gas Capital, partially offset by a decrease in commercial paper borrowings of $249 million at Nicor Gas. See FUTURE EARNINGS POTENTIAL – "Income Tax Matters" and FINANCIAL CONDITION AND LIQUIDITY – "Financing Activities" herein and Notes 5 and 6 to the financial statements for additional information.
Sources of Capital
The Company plans to obtain the funds to meet its future capital needs through operating cash flows, external securities issuances, borrowings from financial institutions, and equity contributions from Southern Company. In addition, the Company plans to utilize the proceeds from the pending asset sales of Elizabethtown Gas and Elkton Gas to pay the income taxes resulting from the sales, to retire existing debt, and for general corporate purposes. However, the amount, type, and timing of any future financings, if needed, depend upon prevailing market conditions, regulatory approval, and other factors. The issuance of securities by Nicor Gas is generally subject to the approval of the Illinois Commission.
The Southern Company system does not maintain a centralized cash or money pool. Therefore, except as described below, funds of the Company are not commingled with funds of any other company in the Southern Company system. The Company obtains financing separately without credit support from any affiliate in the Southern Company system. See Note 6 to the financial statements under "Bank Credit Arrangements" for additional information.
The Company maintains commercial paper programs at Southern Company Gas Capital and Nicor Gas that consist of short-term, unsecured promissory notes. Nicor Gas' commercial paper program supports its working capital needs as Nicor Gas is not permitted to make money pool loans to affiliates. All of the Company's other subsidiaries benefit from Southern Company Gas Capital's commercial paper program.
At December 31, 2017, the Company's current liabilities exceeded current assets by $1.0 billion, primarily as a result of $1.5 billion in notes payable. The Company's current liabilities frequently exceed current assets because of commercial paper borrowings used to fund daily operations, scheduled maturities of long-term debt, and significant seasonal fluctuations in cash needs. The Company intends to utilize operating cash flows, external securities issuances, borrowings from financial institutions, equity contributions from Southern Company, and the proceeds from the pending asset sales of Elizabethtown Gas and Elkton Gas to fund short-term capital needs. The Company has substantial cash flow from operating activities and access to capital markets and financial institutions to meet liquidity needs.
At December 31, 2017, the Company had $73 million of cash and cash equivalents. Committed credit arrangements with banks at December 31, 2017 were as follows:
Company Expires 2022 Unused
  (millions)
Southern Company Gas Capital(*)
 $1,400
 $1,390
Nicor Gas 500
 500
Total $1,900
 $1,890
(*)The Company guarantees the obligations of Southern Company Gas Capital.

MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS (continued)
Southern Company Gas and Subsidiary Companies 2017 Annual Report


See Note 6 to the financial statements under "Bank Credit Arrangements" for additional information.
In May 2017, Southern Company Gas Capital and Nicor Gas terminated their existing credit arrangements for $1.3 billion and $700 million, respectively, which were to mature in 2017 and 2018, and entered into a new multi-year credit arrangement (Facility) currently allocated for $1.4 billion and $500 million, respectively, with a maturity date of 2022, as reflected in the table above. Pursuant to the Facility, the allocations between Southern Company Gas Capital and Nicor Gas may be adjusted.
The Facility contains a covenant that limits the ratio of debt to capitalization (as defined in each facility) to a maximum of 70% for each of the Company and Nicor Gas and contains a cross-acceleration provision to other indebtedness (including guarantee obligations) of the applicable company. Such cross-acceleration provision to other indebtedness would trigger an event of default of the applicable company if the Company or Nicor Gas defaulted on indebtedness, the payment of which was then accelerated. At December 31, 2017, both companies were in compliance with such covenant. The Facility does not contain a material adverse change clause at the time of borrowings.
Subject to applicable market conditions, the applicable company expects to renew or replace the Facility as needed, prior to expiration. In connection therewith, the applicable company may extend the maturity dates and/or increase or decrease the lending commitments thereunder. A portion of unused credit with banks provides liquidity support to the Company.
The Company makes short-term borrowings primarily through commercial paper programs that have the liquidity support of the committed bank credit arrangements described above. Commercial paper borrowings are included in notes payable in the balance sheets.
Details of short-term borrowings were as follows:
  Short-term Debt at the End of the Period 
Short-term Debt During the Period(*)
  Amount
Outstanding
 Weighted Average Interest Rate Average
Amount Outstanding
 Weighted Average Interest Rate Maximum
Amount
Outstanding
  (in millions)   (in millions)   (in millions)
Successor – December 31, 2017:          
Southern Company Gas Capital $1,243
 1.73% $723
 1.40% $1,243
Nicor Gas 275
 1.83% 176
 1.12% 525
Total $1,518
 1.75% $899
 1.35%  
           
Successor – December 31, 2016:          
Southern Company Gas Capital $733
 1.09% $461
 0.79% $770
Nicor Gas 524
 0.95% 309
 0.67% 587
Total $1,257
 1.03% $770
 0.74%  
           
Predecessor – December 31, 2015:          
Southern Company Gas Capital $471
 0.71% $382
 0.49% $787
Nicor Gas 539
 0.52% 349
 0.38% 585
Total $1,010
 0.60% $731
 0.44%  
(*)Average and maximum amounts are based upon daily balances during the 12-month periods.
The Company believes that the need for working capital can be adequately met by utilizing commercial paper programs, lines of credit, and operating cash flows.
Additionally, Pivotal Utility Holdings is party to a series of loan agreements with the New Jersey Economic Development Authority and Brevard County, Florida under which five series of gas facility revenue bonds totaling $200 million have been issued. The Elizabethtown Gas asset sale agreement requires that bonds representing $180 million of the total that are currently eligible for redemption at par be redeemed on or prior to consummation of the sale.
Financing Activities
The long-term debt on the Company's balance sheets includes both principal and non-principal components. As of December 31, 2017, the non-principal components totaled $508 million, including the amount attributable to long-term debt

MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS (continued)
Southern Company Gas and Subsidiary Companies 2017 Annual Report


due within one year, which consisted of the unamortized portions of the fair value adjustment recorded in purchase accounting, debt premiums, debt discounts, and debt issuance costs.
In December 2016, the Company executed intercompany promissory notes to further allocate interest expense to its reportable segments that previously remained in the "all other" segment. These intercompany promissory notes allow the Company to calculate net income, which is its performance measure subsequent to the Merger, at the segment level that incorporates the full impact of interest costs.
In May 2017, Southern Company Gas Capital issued $450 million aggregate principal amount of Series 2017A 4.40% Senior Notes due May 30, 2047. The proceeds were used to repay the Company's short-term indebtedness and for general corporate purposes.
In July 2017, Atlanta Gas Light repaid at maturity $22 million of Series C medium-term notes.
On August 10, 2017, Nicor Gas issued $100 million aggregate principal amount of First Mortgage Bonds 3.03% Series due August 10, 2027 and $100 million aggregate principal amount of First Mortgage Bonds 3.62% Series due August 10, 2037. On November 1, 2017, Nicor Gas issued $100 million aggregate principal amount of First Mortgage Bonds 3.85% Series due August 10, 2047 and $100 million aggregate principal amount of First Mortgage Bonds 4.00% Series due August 10, 2057. The proceeds were used to repay short-term indebtedness incurred under the Nicor Gas commercial paper program and for other working capital needs.
On January 4, 2018, the Company issued a floating rate promissory note to Southern Company, in an aggregate principal amount of $100 million due July 31, 2018 bearing interest based on one-month LIBOR, to support the current activities of wholesale gas services.
In addition to any financings that may be necessary to meet capital requirements and contractual obligations, the Company plans to continue, when economically feasible, a program to retire higher-cost securities and replace these obligations with lower-cost capital if market conditions permit.
Credit Rating Risk
The Company does not have any credit arrangements that would require material changes in payment schedules or terminations as a result of a credit rating downgrade.
There are certain contracts that could require collateral, but not accelerated payment, in the event of a credit rating change below BBB- and/or Baa3. These contracts are for physical gas purchases and sales and energy price risk management. The maximum potential collateral requirement under these contracts at December 31, 2017 was $10 million.
Generally, collateral may be provided by a Southern Company guaranty, letter of credit, or cash. Additionally, a credit rating downgrade could impact the ability of the Company to access capital markets and would be likely to impact the cost at which it does so.
On March 24, 2017, S&P revised its consolidated credit rating outlook for Southern Company and its subsidiaries (including the Company, Southern Company Gas Capital, and Nicor Gas) from stable to negative.
While it is unclear how the credit rating agencies and the relevant state regulatory bodies may respond to the Tax Reform Legislation, certain financial metrics, such as the funds from operations to debt percentage, used by the credit rating agencies to assess Southern Company and its subsidiaries, including the Company, may be negatively impacted. Absent actions by Southern Company and its subsidiaries, including the Company, to mitigate the resulting impacts, which, among other alternatives, could include adjusting capital structure and/or monetizing regulatory assets, the Company's, Southern Company Gas Capital's, and Nicor Gas' credit ratings could be negatively affected. See Note 3 to the financial statements for additional information.
Market Price Risk
The Company is exposed to market risks, primarily commodity price risk, interest rate risk, and weather risk. Due to various cost recovery mechanisms, the natural gas distribution utilities of the Company that sell natural gas directly to end-use customers have limited exposure to market volatility of natural gas prices. To manage the volatility attributable to these exposures, the Company nets the exposures, where possible, to take advantage of natural offsets and enters into various derivative transactions for the remaining exposures pursuant to the Company's policies in areas such as counterparty exposure and risk management practices. The Company uses derivatives to buy and sell natural gas as well as for hedging purposes and mandates strict adherence to all applicable risk management policies. Derivative positions are monitored using techniques including, but not limited to, market valuation, value at risk, stress testing, and sensitivity analysis.

MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS (continued)
Southern Company Gas and Subsidiary Companies 2017 Annual Report


To mitigate future exposure to changes in interest rates, the Company may enter into derivatives designated as hedges. The weighted average interest rate on $200 million of long-term variable interest rate exposure at December 31, 2017 was 1.71%. If the Company sustained a 100 basis point change in interest rates for all long-term variable interest rate exposure, the change would have an immaterial effect on annualized interest expense at December 31, 2017. See Note 1 to the financial statements under "Financial Instruments" and Note 10 to the financial statements for additional information.
Certain natural gas distribution utilities of the Company manage fuel-hedging programs implemented per the guidelines of their respective state regulatory agencies to hedge the impact of market fluctuations in natural gas prices for customers. For the weather risk associated with Nicor Gas, the Company has a corporate weather hedging program that utilizes weather derivatives to reduce the risk of lower adjusted operating margins potentially resulting from significantly warmer-than-normal weather. In addition, certain non-regulated operations routinely utilize various types of derivative instruments to economically hedge certain commodity price and weather risks inherent in the natural gas industry. These instruments include a variety of exchange-traded and over-the-counter (OTC) energy contracts, such as forward contracts, futures contracts, options contracts, and swap agreements. Gas marketing services and wholesale gas services also actively manage storage positions through a variety of hedging transactions for the purpose of managing exposures arising from changing natural gas prices. These hedging instruments are used to substantially protect economic margins (as spreads between wholesale and retail natural gas prices widen between periods) and thereby minimize exposure to declining operating margins. Some of these economic hedge activities may not qualify, or are not designated, for hedge accounting treatment. The Company had no material change in market risk exposure for the year ended December 31, 2017 when compared to the year ended December 31, 2016.
For the periods presented below, the changes in net fair value of derivative contracts were as follows:
 Successor  Predecessor
 Year Ended December 31, 2017July 1, 2016 through December 31, 2016  January 1, 2016 through June 30, 2016Year Ended December 31, 2015
 (in millions)  (in millions)
Contracts outstanding at beginning of period, assets (liabilities), net$8
$(54)  $75
$61
Contracts realized or otherwise settled(1)18
  (77)(17)
Current period changes(a)
(113)48
  (82)32
Contracts outstanding at end of period, assets (liabilities), net(106)12
  (84)76
Netting of cash collateral193
62
  120
96
Cash collateral and net fair value of contracts outstanding at end of period(b)
$87
$74
  $36
$172
(a)Current period changes also include the changes in fair value of new contracts entered into during the period, if any.
(b)Net fair value of derivative contracts outstanding excludes premium and intrinsic value associated with weather derivatives of $11 million at December 31, 2017 and includes premium and intrinsic value associated with weather derivatives of $4 million at December 31, 2016, $5 million at June 30, 2016, and $10 million at December 31, 2015.
The net hedge volume of energy-related derivative contracts for natural gas positions for the years ended December 31 were as follows:
  2017 2016
  mmBtu Volume
  (in millions)
Commodity – Natural gas 300
 157
Net Purchased/(Sold) Volume 300
 157
The Company's derivative contracts are comprised of both long and short natural gas positions. A long position is a contract to purchase natural gas, and a short position is a contract to sell natural gas. The volume presented above represents the net of long natural gas positions of 3.51 billion mmBtu and short natural gas positions of 3.21 billion mmBtu at December 31, 2017 and the net of long natural gas positions of 3.31 billion mmBtu and short natural gas positions of 3.16 billion mmBtu at December 31, 2016.

MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS (continued)
Southern Company Gas and Subsidiary Companies 2017 Annual Report


Energy-related derivative contracts that are designated as regulatory hedges relate primarily to the Company's fuel-hedging programs. Therefore, gains and losses are initially recorded as regulatory liabilities and assets, respectively, and then are included in cost of natural gas as the underlying gas is used in operations and ultimately recovered through the respective cost recovery clause. Certain other gains and losses on energy-related derivatives, designated as cash flow hedges (which are mainly used to hedge anticipated purchases and sales), are initially deferred in OCI before being recognized in income in the same period as the hedged transaction. Gains and losses on energy-related derivative contracts that are not designated or fail to qualify as hedges are recognized in the statements of income as incurred.
Some energy-related derivative contracts require physical delivery as opposed to financial settlement, and this type of derivative is both common and prevalent within the natural gas industry. When an energy-related derivative contract is settled physically, any cumulative unrealized gain or loss is reversed and the contract price is recognized in the respective line item representing the actual price of the underlying goods being delivered.
The Company uses OTC contracts that are not exchange traded but are fair valued using prices which are market observable, and thus fall into Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy. See Note 9 to the financial statements for further discussion of fair value measurements.
The maturities of the energy-related derivative contracts at December 31, 2017 were as follows:
   Fair Value Measurements
   December 31, 2017
   Maturity
 Total
Fair Value
 Year 1  Years 2 & 3 Years 4 & 5
 (in millions)
Level 1(a)
$(148) $(71) $(59) $(18)
Level 2(b)
42
 10
 30
 2
Fair value of contracts outstanding at end of period(c)
$(106) $(61) $(29) $(16)
(a)Valued using NYMEX futures prices.
(b)Valued using basis transactions that represent the cost to transport natural gas from a NYMEX delivery point to the contract delivery point. These transactions are based on quotes obtained either through electronic trading platforms or directly from brokers.
(c)Excludes cash collateral of $193 million as well as premium and associated intrinsic value associated with weather derivatives of $11 million at December 31, 2017.
Value at Risk (VaR)
VaR is the maximum potential loss in portfolio value over a specified time period that is not expected to be exceeded within a given degree of probability. The Company's VaR may not be comparable to that of other companies due to differences in the factors used to calculate VaR. The Company's VaR is determined on a 95% confidence interval and a one-day holding period, which means that 95% of the time, the risk of loss in a day from a portfolio of positions is expected to be less than or equal to the amount of VaR calculated. The open exposure of the Company is managed in accordance with established policies that limit market risk and require daily reporting of potential financial exposure to senior management. Because the Company generally manages physical gas assets and economically protects its positions by hedging in the futures markets, the Company's open exposure is generally mitigated. The Company employs daily risk testing, using both VaR and stress testing, to evaluate the risk of its positions.
The Company actively monitors open commodity positions and the resulting VaR and maintains a relatively small risk exposure as total buy volume is close to sell volume, with minimal open natural gas price risk. Based on a 95% confidence interval and employing a one-day holding period, SouthStar's portfolio of positions for all periods presented was immaterial.

MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS (continued)
Southern Company Gas and Subsidiary Companies 2017 Annual Report


For the periods presented below, wholesale gas services had the following VaRs:
 Successor  Predecessor
 Year Ended December 31, 2017July 1, 2016 through December 31, 2016  January 1, 2016 through June 30, 2016Year Ended December 31, 2015
 (in millions)  (in millions)
Period end(*)
$4.8
$2.3
  $1.9
$2.4
Average2.0
2.0
  2.0
3.0
High(*)
4.8
2.8
  2.5
7.3
Low1.0
1.4
  1.6
1.6
(*)Increase in VaR at December 31, 2017 was driven by significant natural gas price increases in Sequent's key markets due to colder-than-normal weather. As weather moderated during January 2018, VaR reduced to a level consistent with prior periods.
Credit Risk
Gas Distribution Operations
Concentration of credit risk occurs at Atlanta Gas Light for amounts billed for services and other costs to its customers, which consist of 15 Marketers in Georgia. The credit risk exposure to Marketers varies seasonally, with the lowest exposure in the non-peak summer months and the highest exposure in the peak winter months. Marketers are responsible for the retail sale of natural gas to end-use customers in Georgia. The functions of the retail sale of gas include the purchase and sale of natural gas, customer service, billings, and collections. The provisions of Atlanta Gas Light's tariff allow Atlanta Gas Light to obtain credit security support in an amount equal to a minimum of two times a Marketer's highest month's estimated bill from Atlanta Gas Light. For 2017, the four largest Marketers based on customer count accounted for 19% of the Company's adjusted operating margin and 22% of gas distribution operations' adjusted operating margin.
Several factors are designed to mitigate the Company's risks from the increased concentration of credit that has resulted from deregulation. In addition to the security support described above, Atlanta Gas Light bills intrastate delivery service to Marketers in advance rather than in arrears. Atlanta Gas Light accepts credit support in the form of cash deposits, letters of credit/surety bonds from acceptable issuers, and corporate guarantees from investment-grade entities. On a monthly basis, the Risk Management Committee reviews the adequacy of credit support coverage, credit rating profiles of credit support providers, and payment status of each Marketer. The Company believes that adequate policies and procedures are in place to properly quantify, manage, and report on Atlanta Gas Light's credit risk exposure to Marketers.
Atlanta Gas Light also faces potential credit risk in connection with assignments of interstate pipeline transportation and storage capacity to Marketers. Although Atlanta Gas Light assigns this capacity to Marketers, in the event that a Marketer fails to pay the interstate pipelines for the capacity, the interstate pipelines would likely seek repayment from Atlanta Gas Light.
Gas Marketing Services
The Company obtains credit scores for its firm residential and small commercial customers using a national credit reporting agency, enrolling only those customers that meet or exceed the Company's credit threshold. The Company considers potential interruptible and large commercial customers based on reviews of publicly available financial statements and commercially available credit reports. Prior to entering into a physical transaction, the Company also assigns physical wholesale counterparties an internal credit rating and credit limit based on the counterparties' Moody's, S&P, and Fitch ratings, commercially available credit reports, and audited financial statements.
Wholesale Gas Services
The Company has established credit policies to determine and monitor the creditworthiness of counterparties, as well as the quality of pledged collateral. The Company also utilizes master netting agreements whenever possible to mitigate exposure to counterparty credit risk. When the Company is engaged in more than one outstanding derivative transaction with the same counterparty and also has a legally enforceable netting agreement with that counterparty, the "net" mark-to-market exposure represents the netting of the positive and negative exposures with that counterparty and a reasonable measure of the Company's credit risk. The Company also uses other netting agreements with certain counterparties with whom it conducts significant transactions. Master netting agreements enable the Company to net certain assets and liabilities by counterparty. The Company also nets across product lines and against cash collateral, provided the master netting and cash collateral agreements include such provisions.

MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS (continued)
Southern Company Gas and Subsidiary Companies 2017 Annual Report


The Company may require counterparties to pledge additional collateral when deemed necessary. The Company conducts credit evaluations and obtains appropriate internal approvals for a counterparty's line of credit before any transaction with the counterparty is executed. In most cases, the counterparty must have an investment grade rating, which includes a minimum long-term debt rating of Baa3 from Moody's and BBB- from S&P. Generally, the Company requires credit enhancements by way of a guaranty, cash deposit, or letter of credit for transaction counterparties that do not have investment grade ratings.
Certain of the Company's derivative instruments contain credit-risk-related or other contingent features that could increase the payments for collateral it posts in the normal course of business when its financial instruments are in net liability positions. At December 31, 2017, for agreements with such features, the Company's derivative instruments with liability fair values totaled $1 million for which the Company had no collateral posted with derivatives counterparties to satisfy these arrangements.
The Company has a concentration of credit risk as measured by its 30-day receivable exposure plus forward exposure. At December 31, 2017, wholesale gas services' top 20 counterparties represented approximately 48%, or $203 million, of its total counterparty exposure and had a weighted average S&P equivalent credit rating of A-, all of which is consistent with the prior year. The S&P equivalent credit rating is determined by a process of converting the lower of the S&P or Moody's ratings to an internal rating ranging from 9 to 1, with 9 being equivalent to AAA/Aaa by S&P and Moody's, respectively, and 1 being D / Default by S&P and Moody's, respectively. A counterparty that does not have an external rating is assigned an internal rating based on the strength of the financial ratios of that counterparty. To arrive at the weighted average credit rating, each counterparty is assigned an internal ratio, which is multiplied by their credit exposure and summed for all counterparties. The sum is divided by the aggregate total counterparties' exposures, and this numeric value is then converted to an S&P equivalent.
The following table provides credit risk information related to the Company's third-party natural gas contracts receivable and payable positions at December 31:
 Gross Receivables Gross Payables
 2017 2016 2017 2016
 (in millions) (in millions)
Netting agreements in place:       
Counterparty is investment grade$342
 $375
 $202
 $227
Counterparty is non-investment grade20
 14
 25
 31
Counterparty has no external rating226
 223
 315
 339
No netting agreements in place:       
Counterparty is investment grade19
 11
 4
 
Amount recorded in balance sheets$607
 $623
 $546
 $597
Capital Requirements and Contractual Obligations
The Company's capital investments are currently estimated to total $1.7 billion for 2018, $1.7 billion for 2019, $1.5 billion for 2020, $1.2 billion for 2021, and $1.4 billion for 2022. The Company's capital investments include estimated capital expenditures related to Elizabethtown Gas and Elkton Gas of $123 million for 2018, $125 million for 2019, $124 million for 2020, $126 million for 2021, and $129 million for 2022. See Note 11 to the financial statements under "Proposed Sale of Elizabethtown Gas and Elkton Gas" for additional information. The regulatory infrastructure programs and other construction programs are subject to periodic review and revision, and actual costs may vary from these estimates because of numerous factors. These factors include: changes in business conditions; changes in FERC rules and regulations; state regulatory agency approvals; changes in legislation; the cost and efficiency of labor, equipment, and materials; project scope and design changes; and the cost of capital. In addition, there can be no assurance that costs related to capital expenditures will be fully recovered.
In addition, as discussed in Note 2 to the financial statements, the Company provides postretirement benefits to certain eligible employees and funds trusts to the extent required by the applicable state regulatory agencies.
Other funding requirements related to obligations associated with scheduled maturities of long-term debt, including the related interest; pipeline charges, storage capacity, and gas supply; operating leases; asset management agreements; financial derivative obligations; pension and other postretirement benefit plans; and other purchase commitments, primarily related to environmental remediation liabilities, are detailed in the contractual obligations table that follows. See Notes 3, 6, 7, and 11 to the financial statements for additional information.

MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS (continued)
Southern Company Gas and Subsidiary Companies 2017 Annual Report


Contractual Obligations
Contractual obligations at December 31, 2017 were as follows:
 2018 2019-
2020
 2021-
2022
 After
2022
 Total
 (in millions)
Long-term debt(a) —
         
Principal$155
 $350
 $423
 $4,612
 $5,540
Interest241
 452
 421
 3,137
 4,251
Pipeline charges, storage capacity, and gas supply(b)
813
 968
 714
 2,294
 4,789
Operating leases(c)
17
 32
 28
 26
 103
Asset management agreements(d)
9
 6
 
 
 15
Financial derivative obligations(e)
444
 174
 37
 5
 660
Pension and other postretirement benefit plans(f)
13
 28
 
 
 41
Purchase commitments —         
Capital(g)
1,821
 2,979
 2,662
 
 7,462
Other(h)
31
 7
 2
 1
 41
Total$3,544
 $4,996
 $4,287
 $10,075
 $22,902
(a)Amounts are reflected based on final maturity dates. The Company plans to continue, when economically feasible, to retire higher-cost securities and replace these obligations with lower-cost capital if market conditions permit. Variable rate interest obligations are estimated based on rates at December 31, 2017, as reflected in the statements of capitalization.
(b)Includes charges recoverable through a natural gas cost recovery mechanism, or alternatively billed to Marketers, and demand charges associated with Sequent. The gas supply balance includes amounts for Nicor Gas and SouthStar gas commodity purchase commitments of 35 million mmBtu at floating gas prices calculated using forward natural gas prices at December 31, 2017 and valued at $101 million. The Company provides guarantees to certain gas suppliers for certain of its subsidiaries, including SouthStar, in support of payment obligations.
(c)Certain operating leases have provisions for step rent or escalation payments and certain lease concessions are accounted for by recognizing the future minimum lease payments on a straight-line basis over the respective minimum lease terms. However, this accounting treatment does not affect the future annual operating lease cash obligations as shown herein. In terms of rental charges and duration of contracts, the Company's most significant operating leases relate to real estate.
(d)Represent fixed-fee minimum payments for Sequent's affiliated asset management agreements.
(e)See Notes 1 and 10 to the financial statements for additional information.
(f)The Company forecasts contributions to the pension and other postretirement benefit plans over a three-year period. The Company anticipates no mandatory contributions to the qualified pension plan during the next three years. Amounts presented represent estimated benefit payments for the nonqualified pension plans, estimated non-trust benefit payments for the other postretirement benefit plans, and estimated contributions to the other postretirement benefit plan trusts, all of which will be made from the Company's corporate assets. See Note 2 to the financial statements for additional information related to the pension and other postretirement benefit plans, including estimated benefit payments. Certain benefit payments will be made through the related benefit plans. Other benefit payments will be made from the Company's corporate assets.
(g)Estimated capital expenditures are provided through 2022. Capital includes amounts related to Elizabethtown Gas and Elkton Gas, which represent $123 million in 2018, $249 million in 2019-2020, and $255 million in 2021-2022. See Note 11 to the financial statements under "Proposed Sale of Elizabethtown Gas and Elkton Gas" for additional information. Capital also includes amounts related to the Company's pipeline investments that will be recorded at the joint venture level, which represent $64 million in 2018, $195 million in 2019-2020, and less than $1 million in capital expenditures in 2021-2022.
(h)Includes contractual environmental remediation liabilities that are generally recoverable through base rates or rate rider mechanisms and long-term service agreements.

MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS (continued)
Southern Company Gas and Subsidiary Companies 2017 Annual Report


Cautionary Statement Regarding Forward-Looking Statements
The Company's 2017 Annual Report contains forward-looking statements. Forward-looking statements include, among other things, statements concerning regulatory matters, the strategic goals for the Company, economic conditions, natural gas price volatility, derivative losses, regulatory and environmental cost recovery and other rate actions, current and proposed environmental regulations and related compliance plans and estimated expenditures, pending or potential litigation matters, access to sources of capital, projections for the qualified pension plan contributions, financing activities, completion dates of construction projects, completion of announced acquisitions or dispositions, filings with state and federal regulatory authorities, impacts of the Tax Reform Legislation, and estimated other plans and expenditures. In some cases, forward-looking statements can be identified by terminology such as "may," "will," "could," "should," "expects," "plans," "anticipates," "believes," "estimates," "projects," "predicts," "potential," or "continue" or the negative of these terms or other similar terminology. There are various factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from those suggested by the forward-looking statements; accordingly, there can be no assurance that such indicated results will be realized. These factors include:
the impact of recent and future federal and state regulatory changes, including environmental laws and regulations governing air, water, land, and protection of other natural resources, and also changes in tax and other laws and regulations to which the Company is subject, as well as changes in application of existing laws and regulations;
the uncertainty surrounding the recently enacted Tax Reform Legislation, including implementing regulations and IRS interpretations, actions that may be taken in response by regulatory authorities, and its impact, if any, on the credit ratings of the Company, Southern Company Gas Capital, and Nicor Gas;
current and future litigation or regulatory investigations, proceedings, or inquiries;
the effects, extent, and timing of the entry of additional competition in the markets in which the Company operates;
variations in demand for natural gas, including those relating to weather, the general economy, population and business growth (and declines), the effects of energy conservation and efficiency measures, including from the development and deployment of alternative energy sources, and any potential economic impacts resulting from federal fiscal decisions;
available sources and costs of natural gas;
limits on pipeline capacity;
effects of inflation;
the ability to control costs and avoid cost overruns during the development and construction of facilities;
investment performance of the Company's employee and retiree benefit plans;
advances in technology;
state and federal rate regulations and the impact of pending and future rate cases and negotiations, including rate actions relating to natural gas and other cost recovery mechanisms;
the inherent risks involved in transporting and storing natural gas;
the ability to successfully operate the natural gas distribution and storage facilities and the successful performance of necessary corporate functions;
internal restructuring or other restructuring options that may be pursued;
potential business strategies, including acquisitions or dispositions of assets or businesses, including the proposed disposition of Elizabethtown Gas and Elkton Gas, which cannot be assured to be completed or beneficial to the Company;
the possibility that the anticipated benefits from the Merger cannot be fully realized or may take longer to realize than expected and the possibility that costs related to integration with Southern Company will be greater than expected;
the ability of counterparties of the Company to make payments as and when due and to perform as required;
the direct or indirect effect on the Company's business resulting from cyber intrusion or physical attack and the threat of physical attacks;
interest rate fluctuations and financial market conditions and the results of financing efforts;
changes in the Company's, Southern Company Gas Capital's, and Nicor Gas' credit ratings, including impacts on interest rates, access to capital markets, and collateral requirements;
the impacts of any sovereign financial issues, including impacts on interest rates, access to capital markets, impacts on foreign currency exchange rates, counterparty performance, and the economy in general;

MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS (continued)
Southern Company Gas and Subsidiary Companies 2017 Annual Report


catastrophic events such as fires, earthquakes, explosions, floods, tornadoes, hurricanes and other storms, droughts, pandemic health events such as influenzas, or other similar occurrences;
the direct or indirect effects on the Company's business resulting from incidents affecting the U.S. natural gas pipeline infrastructure or operation of storage resources;
impairments of goodwill or long-lived assets;
the effect of accounting pronouncements issued periodically by standard-setting bodies; and
other factors discussed elsewhere herein and in other reports filed by the Company from time to time with the SEC.
The Company expressly disclaims any obligation to update any forward-looking statements.

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME
Southern Company Gas and Subsidiary Companies 2017 Annual Report

  Successor  Predecessor
  For the year ended
December 31,
 July 1, 2016 through December 31,  January 1, 2016 through June 30, 
For the year ended
December 31,
  2017 2016  2016 2015
  (in millions)  (in millions)
Operating Revenues:         
Natural gas revenues (includes revenue taxes of
$100, $32, $57, and $103 for the periods presented,
respectively)
 $3,791
 $1,596
  $1,841
 $3,817
Other revenues 129
 56
  64
 124
Total operating revenues 3,920
 1,652
  1,905
 3,941
Operating Expenses:         
Cost of natural gas 1,601
 613
  755
 1,617
Cost of other sales 29
 10
  14
 28
Other operations and maintenance 940
 482
  454
 928
Depreciation and amortization 501
 238
  206
 397
Taxes other than income taxes 184
 71
  99
 181
Merger-related expenses 
 41
  56
 44
Total operating expenses 3,255
 1,455
  1,584
 3,195
Operating Income 665
 197
  321
 746
Other Income and (Expense):         
Earnings from equity method investments 106
 60
  2
 6
Interest expense, net of amounts capitalized (200) (81)  (96) (175)
Other income (expense), net 39
 14
  5
 9
Total other income and (expense) (55) (7)  (89) (160)
Earnings Before Income Taxes 610
 190
  232
 586
Income taxes 367
 76
  87
 213
Net Income 243
 114
  145
 373
Less: Net income attributable to noncontrolling interest 
 
  14
 20
Net Income Attributable to Southern Company Gas $243
 $114
  $131
 $353
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.


CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME
Southern Company Gas and Subsidiary Companies 2017 Annual Report

  Successor  Predecessor
  For the year ended
December 31,
 July 1, 2016 through December 31,  January 1, 2016 through June 30, 
For the year ended
December 31,
  2017 2016  2016 2015
  (in millions)  (in millions)
Net Income $243
 $114
  $145
 $373
Other comprehensive income (loss):         
Qualifying hedges:         
Changes in fair value, net of tax of
$(3), $(1), $(23), and $(3), respectively
 (5) (1)  (41) 
Reclassification adjustment for amounts included
in net income, net of tax of $-, $-, $-, and $1,
respectively
 1
 
  1
 8
Pension and other postretirement benefit plans:         
Benefit plan net gain (loss), net of tax of
$-, $19, $-, and $-, respectively
 (1) 27
  
 
Reclassification adjustment for amounts included
in net income, net of tax of $-, $-, $4, and $9,
respectively
 
 
  5
 12
Total other comprehensive income (loss) (5) 26
  (35) 20
Less: Comprehensive income attributable to
   noncontrolling interest
 
 
  14
 20
Comprehensive Income Attributable to
Southern Company Gas
 $238
 $140
  $96
 $373
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.


CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
Southern Company Gas and Subsidiary Companies 2017 Annual Report
  Successor  Predecessor
  For the year ended
December 31,
 July 1, 2016 through December 31,  January 1,
2016 through June 30,
 
For the year ended
December 31,
  2017 2016  2016 2015
  (in millions)  (in millions)
Operating Activities:         
Net income $243
 $114
  $145
 $373
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash
provided from (used for) operating activities —
         
Depreciation and amortization, total 501
 238
  206
 397
Deferred income taxes 236
 92
  8
 211
Pension, postretirement, and other employee benefits (1) 6
  5
 24
Pension and postretirement funding 
 (125)  
 
Stock based compensation expense 32
 20
  20
 34
Hedge settlements 
 (35)  (26) 
Goodwill impairment 
 
  
 14
Mark-to-market adjustments (24) (3)  162
 22
Other, net (83) (78)  (82) 43
Changes in certain current assets and liabilities —         
-Receivables (91) (490)  181
 615
-Natural gas for sale, net of
   temporary LIFO liquidation
 36
 (226)  273
 72
-Prepaid income taxes (39) (23)  151
 23
-Other current assets (24) (31)  37
 (11)
-Accounts payable (20) 194
  43
 (434)
-Accrued taxes 110
 8
  41
 (20)
-Accrued compensation 15
 (13)  (21) (6)
-Other current liabilities (8) 24
  (30) 24
Net cash provided from (used for) operating activities 883
 (328)  1,113
 1,381
Investing Activities:         
Property additions (1,514) (614)  (509) (961)
Cost of removal, net of salvage (66) (40)  (32) (84)
Change in construction payables, net 72
 22
  (7) 18
Investment in unconsolidated subsidiaries (145) (1,444)  (14) (12)
Returned investment in unconsolidated subsidiaries 80
 5
  3
 12
Other investing activities 3
 4
  
 
Net cash used for investing activities (1,570) (2,067)  (559) (1,027)
Financing Activities:         
Increase (decrease) in notes payable, net 262
 1,143
  (896) (165)
Proceeds —         
First mortgage bonds 400
 
  250
 
Capital contributions from parent company 103
 1,085
  
 
Senior notes 450
 900
  350
 250
Redemptions and repurchases —         
Medium-term notes (22) 
  
 
First mortgage bonds 
 
  (125) 
Senior notes 
 (420)  
 (200)
Distribution to noncontrolling interest 
 (15)  (19) (18)
Purchase of 15% noncontrolling interest in SouthStar 
 (160)  
 
Payment of common stock dividends (443) (126)  (128) (244)
Other financing activities (9) (8)  10
 11
Net cash provided from (used for) financing activities 741
 2,399
  (558) (366)
Net Change in Cash and Cash Equivalents 54
 4
  (4) (12)
Cash and Cash Equivalents at Beginning of Period 19
 15
  19
 31
Cash and Cash Equivalents at End of Period $73
 $19
  $15
 $19
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
At December 31, 2017 and 2016
Southern Company Gas and Subsidiary Companies 2017 Annual Report

Assets 2017 2016
  (in millions)
Current Assets:    
Cash and cash equivalents $73
 $19
Receivables —    
Energy marketing receivable 607
 623
Customer accounts receivable 400
 364
Unbilled revenues 285
 239
Other accounts and notes receivable 103
 76
Accumulated provision for uncollectible accounts (28) (27)
Materials and supplies 24
 26
Natural gas for sale 595
 631
Prepaid income taxes 26
 24
Prepaid expenses 53
 55
Assets from risk management activities, net of collateral 135
 128
Other regulatory assets, current 94
 81
Other current assets 28
 11
Total current assets 2,395
 2,250
Property, Plant, and Equipment:    
In service 15,833
 14,508
Less: Accumulated depreciation 4,596
 4,439
Plant in service, net of depreciation 11,237
 10,069
Construction work in progress 491
 496
Total property, plant, and equipment 11,728
 10,565
Other Property and Investments:    
Goodwill 5,967
 5,967
Equity investments in unconsolidated subsidiaries 1,477
 1,541
Other intangible assets, net of amortization of $120 and $34
at December 31, 2017 and December 31, 2016, respectively
 280
 366
Miscellaneous property and investments 21
 21
Total other property and investments 7,745
 7,895
Deferred Charges and Other Assets:    
Other regulatory assets, deferred 901
 973
Other deferred charges and assets 218
 170
Total deferred charges and other assets 1,119
 1,143
Total Assets $22,987
 $21,853
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
At December 31, 2017 and 2016
Southern Company Gas and Subsidiary Companies 2017 Annual Report

Liabilities and Stockholder's Equity 2017 2016
  (in millions)
Current Liabilities:    
Securities due within one year $157
 $22
Notes payable 1,518
 1,257
Energy marketing trade payables 546
 597
Accounts payable 446
 348
Customer deposits 128
 153
Accrued taxes —    
Accrued income taxes 40
 26
Other accrued taxes 78
 68
Accrued interest 51
 48
Accrued compensation 74
 58
Liabilities from risk management activities, net of collateral 69
 62
Other regulatory liabilities, current 135
 102
Accrued environmental remediation, current 46
 69
Other current liabilities 113
 108
Total current liabilities 3,401
 2,918
Long-term Debt (See accompanying statements)
 5,891
 5,259
Deferred Credits and Other Liabilities:    
Accumulated deferred income taxes 1,089
 1,975
Deferred credits related to income taxes 1,063
 22
Employee benefit obligations 415
 441
Other cost of removal obligations 1,646
 1,616
Accrued environmental remediation, deferred 342
 357
Other regulatory liabilities, deferred 30
 29
Other deferred credits and liabilities 88
 127
Total deferred credits and other liabilities 4,673
 4,567
Total Liabilities 13,965
 12,744
Common Stockholder's Equity (See accompanying statements)
 9,022
 9,109
Total Liabilities and Stockholder's Equity $22,987
 $21,853
Commitments and Contingent Matters (See notes)
 
 
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.


CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CAPITALIZATION
At December 31, 2017 and 2016
Southern Company Gas and Subsidiary Companies 2017 Annual Report
 2017
 2016
 2017
 2016
 (in millions) (percent of total)
Long-Term Debt:       
Long-term notes payable —       
7.20% due 2017$
 $22
    
3.50% due 2018155
 155
    
5.25% due 2019300
 300
    
3.50% to 9.10% due 2021330
 330
    
8.55% to 8.70% due 202246
 46
    
2.45% to 7.30% due 2023-20473,484
 3,034
    
Total long-term notes payable4,315
 3,887
    
Other long-term debt —       
First mortgage bonds —       
4.70% due 201950
 50
    
2.66% to 6.58% due 2023-2057975
 575
    
Gas facility revenue bonds —       
Variable rate (1.71% at 12/31/17) due 202247
 47
    
Variable rate (1.71% at 12/31/17) due 2024-2033153
 153
    
Total other long-term debt1,225
 825
    
Unamortized fair value adjustment of long-term debt525
 578
    
Unamortized debt discount(17) (9)    
Total long-term debt (annual interest requirement — $241 million)6,048
 5,281
    
Less amount due within one year157
 22
    
Long-term debt excluding amount due within one year5,891
 5,259
 39.5% 36.6%
Common Stockholder's Equity:       
Common stock — par value $0.01 per share       
Authorized — 100 million shares       
Outstanding — 100 shares       
Paid-in capital9,214
 9,095
    
Accumulated deficit(212) (12)    
Accumulated other comprehensive income20
 26
    
Total common stockholder's equity9,022
 9,109
 60.5
 63.4
Total Capitalization$14,913
 $14,368
 100.0% 100.0%
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY
Southern Company Gas and Subsidiary Companies 2017 Annual Report
 Southern Company Gas Common Stockholders' Equity   
 Number of Common Shares Common Stock   
Accumulated
Other
Comprehensive Income
(Loss)
 
Noncontrolling
Interests
 
 Issued Treasury Par Value Paid-In Capital Treasury Retained Earnings (Accumulated Deficit)  Total
 (in thousands) (in millions)
Predecessor –
Balance at December 31, 2014
119,647
 217
 $599
 $2,087
 $(8) $1,312
 $(206) $44
$3,828
Consolidated net income
   attributable to
   Southern Company Gas

 
 
 
 
 353
 
 
353
Other comprehensive income
   (loss)

 
 
 
 
 
 20
 
20
Stock issued221
 
 1
 11
 
 
 
 
12
Stock-based compensation509
 
 3
 1
 
 
 
 
4
Cash dividends on common stock
 
 
 
 
 (244) 
 
(244)
Distribution to
   noncontrolling interest(*)

 
 
 
 
 
 
 (18)(18)
Net income attributable
   to noncontrolling interest (*)

 
 
 
 
 
 
 20
20
Predecessor –
Balance at December 31, 2015
120,377
 217
 603
 2,099
 (8) 1,421
 (186) 46
3,975
Consolidated net income
   attributable to
   Southern Company Gas

 
 
 
 
 131
 
 
131
Other comprehensive income
   (loss)

 
 
 
 
 
 (35) 
(35)
Stock issued95
 
 
 6
 
 
 
 
6
Stock-based compensation270
 
 2
 28
 
 
 
 
30
Cash dividends on common stock
 
 
 
 
 (128) 
 
(128)
Reclassification of
   noncontrolling interest (*)

 
 
 
 
 
 
 (46)(46)
Predecessor –
Balance at June 30, 2016
120,742
 217
 605
 2,133
 (8) 1,424
 (221) 
3,933
Successor –
Balance at July 1, 2016

 
 
 8,001
 
 
 
 
8,001
Consolidated net income
   attributable to
   Southern Company Gas

 
 
 
 
 114
 
 
114
Capital contributions from parent
company

 
 
 1,094
 
 
 
 
1,094
Other comprehensive income
   (loss)

 
 
 
 
 
 26
 
26
Cash dividends on common stock
 
 
 
 
 (126) 
 
(126)
Successor –
Balance at December 31, 2016

 
 
 9,095
 
 (12) 26
 
9,109
Consolidated net income
   attributable to
   Southern Company Gas

 
 
 
 
 243
 
 
243
Capital contributions from
   parent company, net

 
 
 117
 
 
 
 
117
Other comprehensive income
   (loss)

 
   
 
 
 (5) 
(5)
Cash dividends on common stock
 
 
 
 
 (443) 
 
(443)
Other
 
 
 2
 
 
 (1) 
1
Successor –
Balance at December 31, 2017

 
 $
 $9,214
 $
 $(212) $20
 $
$9,022
(*)Associated with SouthStar. See Note 4 to the financial statements for additional information.
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements. 

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Southern Company Gas and Subsidiary Companies 2017 Annual Report




Index to the Notes to Financial Statements


NOTES (continued)
Southern Company Gas and Subsidiary Companies 2017 Annual Report


1. SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES
General
On July 1, 2016, Southern Company and Southern Company Gas (together with its subsidiaries, the Company) completed the Merger and Southern Company Gas became a wholly-owned, direct subsidiary of Southern Company. In addition to the Company, Southern Company is the parent company of four traditional electric operating companies, Southern Power, SCS, Southern Linc, Southern Holdings, Southern Nuclear, PowerSecure, Inc., and other direct and indirect subsidiaries. The Company is an energy services holding company whose primary business is the distribution of natural gas across seven states through its seven natural gas distribution utilities. The Company also is involved in several other businesses that are complementary to the distribution of natural gas. The traditional electric operating companies – Alabama Power Company, Georgia Power Company, Gulf Power Company, and Mississippi Power Company – are vertically integrated utilities providing electric service in four Southeastern states. Southern Power develops, constructs, acquires, owns, and manages power generation assets, including renewable energy projects, and sells electricity at market-based rates in the wholesale market. SCS, the system service company, provides, at cost, specialized services to Southern Company and its subsidiary companies. Southern Linc provides digital wireless communications for use by Southern Company and its subsidiary companies and also markets these services to the public and provides fiber optics services within the Southeast. Southern Holdings is an intermediate holding company subsidiary, primarily for Southern Company's investments in leveraged leases and for other electric services. Southern Nuclear operates and provides services to the Southern Company system's nuclear power plants. PowerSecure, Inc. is a provider of products and services in the areas of distributed generation, energy efficiency, and utility infrastructure.
The financial statements reflect the Company's investments in its subsidiaries on a consolidated basis. The equity method is used for subsidiaries in which the Company has significant influence but does not control and for VIEs where the Company has an equity investment, but is not the primary beneficiary. Intercompany transactions have been eliminated in consolidation.
The seven natural gas distribution utilities are subject to regulation by the regulatory agencies of each state in which they operate. As such, the Company's financial statements reflect the effects of rate regulation in accordance with GAAP and comply with the accounting policies and practices prescribed by its regulatory commissions. The preparation of financial statements in conformity with GAAP requires the use of estimates, and the actual results may differ from those estimates.
Pursuant to the Merger, Southern Company has pushed down the application of the acquisition method of accounting to the financial statements of the Company such that the assets and liabilities are recorded at their respective fair values, and goodwill has been established for the excess of the purchase price over the fair value of net identifiable assets. Accordingly, the financial statements of the Company for periods before and after July 1, 2016 (acquisition date) reflect different bases of accounting, and the financial positions and results of operations of those periods are not comparable. Throughout the financial statements and notes to the financial statements, periods prior to July 1, 2016 are identified as "predecessor," while periods after the acquisition date are identified as "successor."
Certain predecessor period data presented in the financial statements has been modified or reclassified to conform to the presentation used by the Company's new parent company, Southern Company. Changes to the statements of income include classifying operating revenues as natural gas revenues and other revenues as well as classifying cost of goods sold as cost of natural gas and cost of other sales, and presenting interest expense and AFUDC on a gross basis. Changes to the statements of cash flows include revised financial statement line item descriptions to align with the new balance sheet descriptions and expanded line items within each category of cash flow activity. Changes to the balance sheets include changing certain captions to conform to the presentation of Southern Company.
Recently Issued Accounting Standards
Revenue
In 2014, the FASB issued ASC 606, Revenue from Contracts with Customers (ASC 606), replacing the existing accounting standard and industry specific guidance for revenue recognition with a five-step model for recognizing and measuring revenue from contracts with customers. The underlying principle of the new standard is to recognize revenue to depict the transfer of goods or services to customers at the amount expected to be collected. The new standard also requires enhanced disclosures regarding the nature, amount, timing, and uncertainty of revenue and the related cash flows arising from contracts with customers.
Most of the Company's revenue, including energy provided to customers, is from tariff offerings that provide natural gas without a defined contractual term, as well as longer-term contractual agreements, including non-derivative natural gas asset management and optimization arrangements.

NOTES (continued)
Southern Company Gas and Subsidiary Companies 2017 Annual Report


The Company has completed the evaluation of all revenue streams and determined that the adoption of ASC 606 will not change the current timing of revenue recognition for such transactions. Some revenue arrangements, such as energy-related derivatives and alternative revenue programs, are excluded from the scope of ASC 606 and, therefore, will be accounted for and disclosed or presented separately from revenues under ASC 606 on the Company's financial statements. The Company has concluded contributions in aid of construction are not in scope for ASC 606 and will continue to be accounted for as an offset to property, plant, and equipment.
The new standard is effective for reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2017. The Company applied the modified retrospective method of adoption effective January 1, 2018. The Company also utilized practical expedients which allowed it to apply the standard to open contracts at the date of adoption and to reflect the aggregate effect of all modifications when identifying performance obligations and allocating the transaction price for contracts modified before the effective date. Under the modified retrospective method of adoption, prior year reported results are not restated; however, a cumulative-effect adjustment to retained earnings at January 1, 2018 is recorded. In addition, quarterly disclosures will include comparative information on 2018 financial statement line items under current guidance. The adoption of ASC 606 did not result in a cumulative-effect adjustment.
Leases
In February 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-02, Leases (Topic 842) (ASU 2016-02). ASU 2016-02 requires lessees to recognize on the balance sheet a lease liability and a right-of-use asset for all leases. ASU 2016-02 also changes the recognition, measurement, and presentation of expense associated with leases and provides clarification regarding the identification of certain components of contracts that would represent a lease. The accounting required by lessors is relatively unchanged. ASU 2016-02 is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2018 and the Company will adopt the new standard effective January 1, 2019.
The Company is currently implementing an information technology system along with the related changes to internal controls and accounting policies that will support the accounting for leases under ASU 2016-02. In addition, the Company has substantially completed a detailed inventory and analysis of its leases. In terms of rental charges and duration of contracts, the most significant leases relate to real estate and fleet vehicles where the Company is the lessee and to natural gas home appliances where the Company is the lessor. While the Company has not yet determined the ultimate impact, adoption of ASU 2016-02 is expected to have a significant impact on the Company's balance sheet.
Other
In March 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-09, Compensation-Stock Compensation (Topic 718): Improvements to Employee Share-Based Payment Accounting (ASU 2016-09). ASU 2016-09 changes the accounting for income taxes and the cash flow presentation for share-based payment award transactions effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2016. The new guidance requires all excess tax benefits and deficiencies related to the exercise or vesting of stock compensation to be recognized as income tax expense or benefit in the income statement. Previously, the Company recognized any excess tax benefits and deficiencies related to the exercise and vesting of stock compensation as additional paid-in capital. In addition, the new guidance requires excess tax benefits for share-based payments to be included in net cash provided from operating activities rather than net cash provided from financing activities on the statement of cash flows. The Company elected to adopt the guidance in 2016 and reflect the related adjustments as of January 1, 2016. Prior year's data presented in the financial statements has not been adjusted. The Company also elected to recognize forfeitures as they occur. The new guidance did not have a material impact on the results of operations, financial position, or cash flows of the Company. See Note 5 for the disclosure impacted by ASU 2016-09.
In November 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-18, Statement of Cash Flows (Topic 230): Restricted Cash (ASU 2016-18). ASU 2016-18 eliminates the need to reflect transfers between cash and restricted cash in operating, investing, and financing activities in the statement of cash flows. Upon adoption, the net change in cash and cash equivalents during the period will include amounts generally described as restricted cash or restricted cash equivalents. ASU 2016-18 is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2017, and will be applied retrospectively to each period presented. The Company adopted ASU 2016-18 effective January 1, 2018 with no material impact on its financial statements.
On January 26, 2017, the FASB issued ASU No. 2017-04, Intangibles – Goodwill and Other (Topic 350): Simplifying the Test for Goodwill Impairment (ASU 2017-04). ASU 2017-04 removes the requirement to compare the implied fair value of goodwill with the carrying amount as part of Step 2 of the goodwill impairment test. Under the new standard, the goodwill impairment loss will be measured as the excess of a reporting unit's carrying amount over its fair value, not exceeding the total amount of goodwill allocated to that reporting unit, which may increase the frequency of goodwill impairment charges if a future goodwill impairment test does not pass the Step 1 evaluation. ASU 2017-04 is effective prospectively for periods beginning on or after December 15, 2019, with early adoption permitted. The Company adopted ASU 2017-04 effective January 1, 2018 with no impact on its financial statements.

NOTES (continued)
Southern Company Gas and Subsidiary Companies 2017 Annual Report


On March 10, 2017, the FASB issued ASU No. 2017-07, Compensation – Retirement Benefits (Topic 715): Improving the Presentation of Net Periodic Pension Cost and Net Periodic Postretirement Benefit Cost (ASU 2017-07). ASU 2017-07 requires that an employer report the service cost component in the same line item or items as other compensation costs and requires the other components of net periodic pension and postretirement benefit costs to be separately presented in the income statement outside of income from operations. Additionally, only the service cost component is eligible for capitalization, when applicable. However, all cost components remain eligible for capitalization under FERC regulations. ASU 2017-07 will be applied retrospectively for the presentation of the service cost component and the other components of net periodic pension and postretirement benefit costs in the income statement. The capitalization of only the service cost component of net periodic pension and postretirement benefit costs in assets will be applied on a prospective basis. ASU 2017-07 is effective for periods beginning after December 15, 2017. The presentation changes required for net periodic pension and postretirement benefit costs will result in a decrease in the Company's operating income and an increase in other income for 2016 and 2017 and are expected to result in a decrease in operating income and an increase in other income for 2018. The Company adopted ASU 2017-07 effective January 1, 2018 with no material impact on its financial statements.
On August 28, 2017, the FASB issued ASU No. 2017-12, Derivatives and Hedging (Topic 815): Targeted Improvements to Accounting for Hedging Activities (ASU 2017-12), amending the hedge accounting recognition and presentation requirements. ASU 2017-12 makes more financial and non-financial hedging strategies eligible for hedge accounting, amends the related presentation and disclosure requirements, and simplifies hedge effectiveness assessment requirements. ASU 2017-12 is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2018, with early adoption permitted. The Company adopted ASU 2017-12 effective January 1, 2018 with no material impact on its financial statements.
Affiliate Transactions
SCS, as agent for Alabama Power, Georgia Power, and Southern Power, and the Company have long-term interstate natural gas transportation agreements with SNG. The interstate transportation service provided to Alabama Power, Georgia Power, Southern Power, and the Company by SNG pursuant to these agreements is governed by the terms and conditions of SNG's natural gas tariff and is subject to FERC regulation. For the successor year ended December 31, 2017, transportation revenue under these agreements from SCS and the Company were $136 million and $32 million, respectively. For the successor period of September 1, 2016 through December 31, 2016, transportation revenue under these agreements from SCS and the Company were $32 million and $15 million, respectively. See Note 4 under "Equity Method Investments – SNG" for additional information regarding the Company's investment in SNG.
The Company has an agreement with SCS under which the following services are currently being rendered to the Company as direct or allocated cost: accounting, finance and treasury, tax, information technology, auditing, insurance and pension administration, human resources, systems and procedures, purchasing, and other services. For the successor year ended December 31, 2017 and the successor period of July 1, 2016 through December 31, 2016, costs for these services amounted to $63 million and $17 million, respectively. Cost allocation methodologies have been reported to the FERC and management believes they are reasonable. The FERC permits services to be rendered at cost by system service companies.
SCS, as agent for Alabama Power, Georgia Power, and Southern Power, has agreements with certain subsidiaries of the Company to purchase natural gas. For the successor year ended December 31, 2017, natural gas purchases made by SCS from the Company's subsidiaries were $142 million. For the successor period of July 1, 2016 through December 31, 2016, natural gas purchases made by SCS from the Company's subsidiaries were $27 million.
Regulatory Assets and Liabilities
The Company is subject to accounting requirements for the effects of rate regulation. Regulatory assets represent probable future revenues associated with certain costs that are expected to be recovered from customers through the ratemaking process. Regulatory liabilities represent probable future reductions in revenues associated with amounts that are expected to be credited to customers through the ratemaking process.

NOTES (continued)
Southern Company Gas and Subsidiary Companies 2017 Annual Report


Regulatory assets and (liabilities) reflected in the balance sheets at December 31 relate to:
 2017 2016 Note
 (in millions)  
Environmental remediation$410
 $411
 (a,b)
Retiree benefit plans270
 325
 (a,c)
Long-term debt fair value adjustment138
 154
 (d)
Under recovered regulatory clause revenues98
 118
 (e)
Other regulatory assets79
 58
 (f)
Other cost of removal obligations(1,646) (1,616) (g)
Deferred income tax credits(1,063) (22) (g,i)
Over recovered regulatory clause revenues(144) (104) (e)
Other regulatory liabilities(21) (39) (h)
Total regulatory assets (liabilities), net$(1,879) $(715)  
Note: The recovery and amortization periods for these regulatory assets and (liabilities) are as follows:
(a)Not earning a return as offset in rate base by a corresponding asset or liability.
(b)Recovered through environmental cost recovery mechanisms when the remediation is performed or the work is performed.
(c)Recovered and amortized over the average remaining service period which range up to 15 years. See Note 2 for additional information.
(d)Recovered over the remaining life of the original debt issuances, which range up to 21 years.
(e)Recorded and recovered or amortized as approved or accepted by the appropriate state regulatory agencies over periods generally not exceeding eight years.
(f)Comprised of several components including unamortized loss on reacquired debt, weather normalization, franchise gas, deferred depreciation expense, and financial instrument-hedging assets, which are recovered or amortized as approved by the applicable state regulatory agencies over periods generally not exceeding 10 years, except for financial hedging-instruments. Financial instrument-hedging assets are recorded over the life of the underlying hedged purchase contracts, which generally do not exceed two years. Upon final settlement, actual costs incurred are recovered, and actual income earned is refunded through the energy cost recovery clause.
(g)Other cost of removal obligations are recorded and deferred income tax liabilities are amortized over the related property lives, which may range up to 80 years. Cost of removal liabilities will be settled and trued up following completion of the related activities.
(h)Comprised of several components including energy efficiency programs, unamortized bond issuance costs and financial instrument-hedging liabilities which are recovered or amortized as approved by the applicable state regulatory agencies over periods generally not exceeding a range of four years to 20 years, except for financial hedging-instruments. Financial instrument-hedging liabilities are recorded over the life of the underlying hedged purchase contracts, which generally do not exceed two years. Upon final settlement, actual costs incurred are recovered, and actual income earned is refunded through the energy cost recovery clause.
(i)Includes excess deferred income tax liabilities not subject to normalization as a result of the Tax Reform Legislation, the recovery and amortization of which will be determined by the applicable state regulatory agencies. See Note 3 under "Regulatory Matters" and Note 5 for additional details.
In the event that a portion of a natural gas distribution utility's operations is no longer subject to applicable accounting rules for rate regulation, the Company would be required to write off to income related regulatory assets and liabilities that are not specifically recoverable through regulated rates. In addition, the natural gas distribution utility would be required to determine if any impairment to other assets, including plant, exists and write down the assets, if impaired, to their fair values. All regulatory assets and liabilities are to be reflected in rates. See Note 3 under "Regulatory Matters" for additional information.
Revenues
Gas Distribution Operations
The Company records revenues when goods or services are provided to customers. Those revenues are based on rates approved by the state regulatory agencies of the Company's utilities. As required by the Georgia PSC, Atlanta Gas Light bills Marketers in equal monthly installments for each residential, commercial, and industrial end-use customer's distribution costs as well as for capacity costs utilizing a seasonal rate design for the calculation of each residential end-use customer's annual straight-fixed-variable charge, which reflects the historic volumetric usage pattern for the entire residential class.
All of the natural gas distribution utilities, with the exception of Atlanta Gas Light, have rate structures that include volumetric rate designs that allow the opportunity to recover certain costs based on gas usage. Revenues from sales and transportation services are recognized in the same period in which the related volumes are delivered to customers. Revenues from residential and certain commercial and industrial customers are recognized on the basis of scheduled meter readings. Additionally, unbilled revenues are recognized for estimated deliveries of gas not yet billed to these customers, from the last bill date to the end of the accounting period. For other commercial and industrial customers and for all wholesale customers, revenues are based on actual deliveries to the end of the period.

NOTES (continued)
Southern Company Gas and Subsidiary Companies 2017 Annual Report


The tariffs for several of the natural gas distribution utilities include provisions which allow for the recognition of certain revenues prior to the time such revenues are billed to customers. These provisions are referred to as alternative revenue programs and provide for the recognition of certain revenues prior to billing, so long as the amounts recognized will be collected from customers within 24 months of recognition. These programs are as follows:
Weather normalization adjustments – reduce customer bills when winter weather is colder than normal and increase customer bills when weather is warmer than normal and are included in the tariffs for Virginia Natural Gas, Elizabethtown Gas, and Chattanooga Gas;
Revenue normalization mechanisms – mitigate the impact of conservation and declining customer usage and are contained in the tariffs for Virginia Natural Gas, Chattanooga Gas, and Elkton Gas; and
Revenue true-up adjustment – included within the provisions of the Georgia Rate Adjustment Mechanism (GRAM) program in which Atlanta Gas Light participates as a short-term alternative to formal rate case filings, the revenue true-up feature provides for a monthly positive (or negative) adjustment to record revenue in the amount of any variance to budgeted revenues, which are submitted and approved annually as a requirement of GRAM. Such adjustments are reflected in customer billings in a subsequent program year.
Revenue Taxes
The Company charges customers for gas revenue and gas use taxes imposed on the Company and remits amounts owed to various governmental authorities. Gas revenue taxes are recorded at the amount charged to customers, which may include a small administrative fee, as operating revenues, and the related taxes imposed on the Company are recorded as operating expenses on the statements of income. Gas use taxes are excluded from revenue and expense with the related administrative fee included in operating revenues when the tax is imposed on the customer. Revenue taxes included in operating expenses were $98 million and $31 million for the successor year ended December 31, 2017 and the successor period of July 1, 2016 through December 31, 2016, respectively, and $56 million and $101 million for the predecessor periods of January 1, 2016 through June 30, 2016 and the year ended December 31, 2015, respectively.
Gas Marketing Services
The Company recognizes revenues from natural gas sales and transportation services in the same period in which the related volumes are delivered to customers and recognizes sales revenues from residential and certain commercial and industrial customers on the basis of scheduled meter readings. The Company also recognizes unbilled revenues for estimated deliveries of gas not yet billed to these customers from the most recent meter reading date to the end of the accounting period. For other commercial and industrial customers and for all wholesale customers, revenues are based on actual deliveries during the period.
The Company recognizes revenues on 12-month utility-bill management contracts as the lesser of cumulative earned or cumulative billed amounts. Revenues for warranty and repair contracts are recognized on a straight-line basis over the contract term while revenues for maintenance services are recognized at the time such services are performed.
Wholesale Gas Services
The Company nets revenues from energy and risk management activities with the associated costs. Profits from sales between segments are eliminated and are recognized as goods or services sold to end-use customers. The Company records transactions that qualify as derivatives at fair value with changes in fair value recognized in earnings in the period of change and characterized as unrealized gains or losses. Gains and losses on derivatives held for energy trading purposes are presented on a net basis in revenue.
Concentration of Revenue
The Company has a diversified base of customers. No single customer or industry comprises 10% or more of revenues. For all periods presented, uncollectible accounts averaged less than 1% of revenues.
Cost of Natural Gas and Other Sales
Gas Distribution Operations
Excluding Atlanta Gas Light, which does not sell natural gas to end-use customers, the Company charges its utility customers for natural gas consumed using natural gas cost recovery mechanisms set by the applicable state regulatory agencies. Under these mechanisms, all prudently-incurred natural gas costs are passed through to customers without markup, subject to regulatory review. The Company defers or accrues the difference between the actual cost of natural gas and the amount of commodity

NOTES (continued)
Southern Company Gas and Subsidiary Companies 2017 Annual Report


revenue earned in a given period such that no operating income is recognized related to these costs. The deferred or accrued amount is either billed or refunded to customers prospectively through adjustments to the commodity rate. Deferred and accrued natural gas costs are included in the balance sheets as regulatory assets and regulatory liabilities, respectively.
Gas Marketing Services
The Company's gas marketing services' customers are charged for actual or estimated natural gas consumed. Within cost of natural gas, the Company also includes costs of fuel and lost and unaccounted for gas, adjustments to reduce the value of inventories to market value, and gains and losses associated with certain derivatives. The Company records the costs to service its warranty and repair contract claims as cost of other sales.
Income and Other Taxes
The Company uses the liability method of accounting for deferred income taxes and provides deferred income taxes for all significant income tax temporary differences. Federal ITCs utilized are deferred and amortized to income over the average life of the related property. Taxes that are collected from customers on behalf of governmental agencies to be remitted to these agencies are presented on the balance sheet, excluding revenue taxes which are presented on the statements of income. See "Revenues – Gas Distribution Operations – Revenue Taxes" herein for additional information.
The Company recognizes tax positions that are "more likely than not" of being sustained upon examination by the appropriate taxing authorities. See Note 5 under "Unrecognized Tax Benefits" for additional information.
Property, Plant, and Equipment
Property, plant, and equipment is stated at original cost, or fair value at the effective date of the Merger as appropriate, less any regulatory disallowances and impairments. Original cost includes: materials; labor; minor items of property; appropriate administrative and general costs; payroll-related costs such as taxes, pensions, and other benefits; and the interest capitalized and cost of equity funds used during construction.
The Company's property, plant, and equipment in service consisted of the following at December 31:
 2017  2016
 (in millions)
Utility plant in service$13,079
  $11,996
Information technology equipment and software366
  324
Storage facilities1,599
  1,463
Other789
  725
Total other plant in service2,754
  2,512
Total plant in service$15,833
  $14,508
The cost of replacements of property, exclusive of minor items of property, is capitalized. The cost of maintenance, repairs, and replacement of minor items of property is charged to other operations and maintenance expenses as incurred or performed. The portion of non-working gas used to maintain the structural integrity of the Company's natural gas storage facilities that is considered to be non-recoverable is recorded as depreciable property, plant, and equipment, while the recoverable or retained portion is recorded as non-depreciable property, plant, and equipment.
The amount of non-cash property additions recognized for the successor periods of the year ended December 31, 2017 and July 1, 2016 through December 31, 2016 and the predecessor periods of January 1, 2016 through June 30, 2016 and the year ended December 31, 2015 were $135 million, $63 million, $41 million, and $48 million, respectively. These amounts are comprised of construction-related accounts payable outstanding at the end of each period.
Depreciation and Amortization
Depreciation of the original cost of utility plant in service is provided using composite straight-line rates, which approximated 2.9% in 2017, 2.8% in 2016, and 2.7% in 2015. Depreciation studies are conducted periodically to update the composite rates that are approved by the respective state regulatory agency. When property subject to composite depreciation is retired or otherwise disposed of in the normal course of business, its original cost, together with the cost of removal, less salvage, is charged to accumulated depreciation. For other property dispositions, the applicable cost and accumulated depreciation are removed from the balance sheet accounts, and a gain or loss is recognized. Minor items of property included in the original cost of the asset are retired when the related property unit is retired.

NOTES (continued)
Southern Company Gas and Subsidiary Companies 2017 Annual Report


Depreciation of the original cost of other plant in service is provided primarily on a straight-line basis over the following useful lives: five to 15 years for transportation equipment, 40 to 60 years for storage facilities, and up to 65 years for other assets.
Allowance for Funds Used During Construction
The Company records AFUDC for Atlanta Gas Light, Nicor Gas, Chattanooga Gas, and Elizabethtown Gas, which represents the estimated debt and equity costs of capital funds that are necessary to finance the construction of new regulated facilities. While cash is not realized currently, AFUDC increases the revenue requirement and is recovered over the service life of the asset through a higher rate base and higher depreciation. All current construction costs are included in rates. The capital expenditures of the other three natural gas utilities do not qualify for AFUDC treatment.
The Company's AFUDC composite rates are as follows:
 Successor  Predecessor
 Year ended December 31, 2017  July 1, 2016 through December 31, 2016  January 1, 2016 through June 30, 2016 Year ended December 31, 2015
Atlanta Gas Light 
8.10%  4.05%  4.05% 8.10%
Chattanooga Gas7.41
  3.71
  3.71
 7.41
Elizabethtown Gas(*)
1.56
  0.84
  0.84
 1.69
Nicor Gas(*)
1.22
  1.50
  1.50
 0.82
(*)Variable rate is determined by the FERC method of AFUDC accounting.
Cash payments for interest during the successor periods of the year ended December 31, 2017 and July 1, 2016 through December 31, 2016 and the predecessor periods of January 1, 2016 through June 30, 2016 and the year ended December 31, 2015 totaled $223 million, $135 million, $119 million, and $181 million, respectively.
Impairment of Long-Lived Assets
The Company evaluates long-lived assets for impairment when events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying value of such assets may not be recoverable. The determination of whether an impairment has occurred is based on either a specific regulatory disallowance or an estimate of undiscounted future cash flows attributable to the assets, as compared with the carrying value of the assets. If an impairment has occurred, the amount of the impairment recognized is determined by either the amount of regulatory disallowance or by estimating the fair value of the assets and recording a loss if the carrying value is greater than the fair value. For assets identified as held for sale, the carrying value is compared to the estimated fair value less the cost to sell in order to determine if an impairment loss is required. Until the assets are disposed of, their estimated fair value is re-evaluated when circumstances or events change. See Note 3 under "Other Matters" for additional information.
Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets and Liabilities
Goodwill is not amortized, but is subject to an annual impairment test during the fourth quarter of each year, or more frequently if impairment indicators arise. In assessing goodwill for impairment, the Company has the option of first performing a qualitative assessment to determine that it is more likely than not that fair value of its reporting unit exceeds its carrying value (commonly referred to as Step 0). If the Company chooses not to perform a qualitative assessment, or the result of Step 0 indicates a probable decrease in fair value of its reporting unit below its carrying value, a quantitative two-step test is performed (commonly referred to as Step 1 and Step 2). Step 1 compares the fair value of the reporting unit to its carrying value including goodwill. If the carrying value exceeds the fair value, Step 2 is performed to allocate the fair value of the reporting unit to its assets and liabilities in order to determine the implied fair value of goodwill, which is compared to the carrying value of goodwill to calculate an impairment loss, if any.
For the 2017 annual impairment test, the Company performed Step 1 of the two-step impairment test, which resulted in the fair value of all its reporting units that have goodwill exceeding their carrying value. For the 2016 and 2015 annual impairment tests, the Company performed the qualitative Step 0 assessment and determined that it was more likely than not that the fair value of all its reporting units with goodwill exceeded their carrying values, and therefore no quantitative assessment was required. In the third quarter 2015, the Company identified potential impairment indicators and performed an interim impairment test for its storage and fuels reporting unit, which resulted in impairment of the full $14 million goodwill balance for that reporting unit.

NOTES (continued)
Southern Company Gas and Subsidiary Companies 2017 Annual Report


Goodwill and other intangible assets consisted of the following:
   At December 31, 2017
 Estimated Useful Life Gross Carrying Amount Accumulated Amortization Other Intangible Assets, Net
   (in millions)
Other intangible assets subject to amortization:       
Gas marketing services       
   Customer relationships11-16 years $221
 $(77) $144
   Trade names10-28 years 115
 (9) 106
Wholesale gas services       
   Storage and transportation contracts1-5 years 64
 (34) 30
Total intangible assets subject to amortization  $400
 $(120) $280
        
Goodwill:       
Gas distribution operations  $4,702
 $
 $4,702
Gas marketing services  1,265
 
 1,265
Total goodwill  $5,967
 $
 $5,967
   At December 31, 2016
 Estimated Useful Life Gross Carrying Amount Accumulated Amortization Other Intangible Assets, Net
   (in millions)
Other intangible assets subject to amortization:       
Gas marketing services       
   Customer relationships11-16 years $221
 $(30) $191
   Trade names10-28 years 115
 (2) 113
Wholesale gas services       
   Storage and transportation contracts1-5 years 64
 (2) 62
Total intangible assets subject to amortization  $400
 $(34) $366
        
Goodwill:       
Gas distribution operations  $4,702
 $
 $4,702
Gas marketing services  1,265
 
 1,265
Total goodwill  $5,967
 $
 $5,967
Amortization associated with intangible assets for gas marketing services, included in depreciation and amortization, for the successor year ended December 31, 2017 and the successor period of July 1, 2016 through December 31, 2016 and the predecessor periods of January 1, 2016 through June 30, 2016 and the year ended December 31, 2015 was $54 million, $32 million, $8 million, and $18 million, respectively. Amortization of $32 million and $2 million for wholesale gas services was recorded as a reduction to operating revenues for the successor year ended December 31, 2017 and the successor period of July 1, 2016 through December 31, 2016, respectively.

NOTES (continued)
Southern Company Gas and Subsidiary Companies 2017 Annual Report


As of December 31, 2017, the estimated amortization associated with other intangible assets is as follows:
 Amortization
 (in millions)
2018$58
201940
202028
202121
202217
Included in other deferred credits and liabilities on the balance sheets is $91 million of intangible liabilities that were recorded during acquisition accounting for transportation contracts at wholesale gas services. At December 31, 2017, the accumulated amortization of these intangible liabilities was $50 million. The estimated amortization associated with the intangible liabilities that will be recorded in natural gas revenues is as follows:
 Amortization
 (in millions)
2018$24
201917
Cash and Cash Equivalents
For purposes of the financial statements, temporary cash investments are considered cash equivalents. Temporary cash investments are securities with original maturities of 90 days or less.
Energy Marketing Receivables and Payables
Wholesale gas services provides services to retail gas marketers, wholesale gas marketers, utility companies, and industrial customers. These counterparties utilize netting agreements that enable wholesale gas services to net receivables and payables by counterparty upon settlement. Wholesale gas services also nets across product lines and against cash collateral, provided the master netting and cash collateral agreements include such provisions. While the amounts due from, or owed to, wholesale gas services' counterparties are settled net, they are recorded on a gross basis in the balance sheets as energy marketing receivables and energy marketing payables.
Wholesale gas services has trade and credit contracts that contain minimum credit rating requirements. These credit rating requirements typically give counterparties the right to suspend or terminate credit if the Company's credit ratings are downgraded to non-investment grade status. Under such circumstances, wholesale gas services would need to post collateral to continue transacting business with some of its counterparties. As of December 31, 2017 and 2016, the required collateral in the event of a credit rating downgrade was $8 million and immaterial, respectively.
Wholesale gas services has a concentration of credit risk for services it provides to its counterparties. This credit risk is generally concentrated in 20 of its counterparties and is measured by 30-day receivable exposure plus forward exposure. Counterparty credit risk is evaluated using an S&P equivalent credit rating, which is determined by a process of converting the lower of the S&P or Moody's rating to an internal rating ranging from 9 to 1, with 9 being equivalent to AAA/Aaa by S&P and Moody's, respectively, and 1 being equivalent to D/Default by S&P and Moody's, respectively. A counterparty that does not have an external rating is assigned an internal rating based on the strength of its financial ratios. As of December 31, 2017, the top 20 counterparties represented 48%, or $203 million, of the total counterparty exposure and had a weighted average S&P equivalent rating of A-.
Credit policies were established to determine and monitor the creditworthiness of counterparties, including requirements to post collateral or other credit security, as well as the quality of pledged collateral. Collateral or credit security is most often in the form of cash or letters of credit from an investment-grade financial institution, but may also include cash or U.S. government securities held by a trustee. When wholesale gas services is engaged in more than one outstanding derivative transaction with the same counterparty and it also has a legally enforceable netting agreement with that counterparty, the "net" mark-to-market exposure represents the netting of the positive and negative exposures with that counterparty combined with a reasonable measure of the Company's credit risk. Wholesale gas services also uses other netting agreements with certain counterparties with whom it conducts significant transactions.

NOTES (continued)
Southern Company Gas and Subsidiary Companies 2017 Annual Report


Receivables and Provision for Uncollectible Accounts
The Company's other trade receivables consist primarily of natural gas sales and transportation services billed to residential, commercial, industrial, and other customers. Customers are billed monthly and payment is due within 30 days. For the majority of receivables, a provision for uncollectible accounts is established based on historical collection experience and other factors. For the remaining receivables, if the Company is aware of a specific customer's inability to pay, a provision for uncollectible accounts is recorded to reduce the receivable balance to the amount the Company reasonably expects to collect. If circumstances change, the estimate of the recoverability of accounts receivable could change as well. Circumstances that could affect this estimate include, but are not limited to, customer credit issues, customer deposits, and general economic conditions. Customers' accounts are written off once they are deemed to be uncollectible.
Nicor Gas
Credit risk exposure at Nicor Gas is mitigated by a bad debt rider approved by the Illinois Commission. The bad debt rider provides for the recovery from (or refund to) customers of the difference between Nicor Gas' actual bad debt experience on an annual basis and the benchmark bad debt expense used to establish its base rates for the respective year.
Atlanta Gas Light
Concentration of credit risk occurs at Atlanta Gas Light for amounts billed for services and other costs to its customers, which consist of 15 Marketers in Georgia. The credit risk exposure to Marketers varies seasonally, with the lowest exposure in the non-peak summer months and the highest exposure in the peak winter months. Marketers are responsible for the retail sale of natural gas to end-use customers in Georgia. The functions of the retail sale of gas include the purchase and sale of natural gas, customer service, billings, and collections. The provisions of Atlanta Gas Light's tariff allow Atlanta Gas Light to obtain credit security support in an amount equal to a minimum of two times a Marketer's highest month's estimated bill from Atlanta Gas Light.
Materials and Supplies
Generally, materials and supplies include propane gas inventory, fleet fuel, and other materials and supplies. Materials are charged to inventory when purchased and then expensed or capitalized to plant, as appropriate, at weighted average cost when installed.
Natural Gas for Sale
The natural gas distribution utilities, with the exception of Nicor Gas, record natural gas inventories on a WACOG basis. In Georgia's competitive environment, Marketers sell natural gas to firm end-use customers at market-based prices. Part of the unbundling process, which resulted from deregulation and provides this competitive environment, is the assignment to Marketers of certain pipeline services that Atlanta Gas Light has under contract. On a monthly basis, Atlanta Gas Light assigns to Marketers the majority of the pipeline storage services that it has under contract, along with a corresponding amount of inventory. Atlanta Gas Light retains and manages a portion of its pipeline storage assets and related natural gas inventories for system balancing and to serve system demand.
Nicor Gas' inventory is carried at cost on a LIFO basis. Inventory decrements occurring during the year that are restored prior to year end are charged to cost of natural gas at the estimated annual replacement cost. Inventory decrements that are not restored prior to year end are charged to cost of natural gas at the actual LIFO cost of the inventory layers liquidated. The cost of gas, including inventory costs, is recovered from customers under a purchased gas recovery mechanism adjusted for differences between actual costs and amounts billed; therefore, LIFO liquidations have no impact on the Company's net income. At December 31, 2017, the Nicor Gas LIFO inventory balance was $148 million. Based on the average cost of gas purchased in December 2017, the estimated replacement cost of Nicor Gas' inventory at December 31, 2017 was $264 million. During 2017, Nicor Gas did not liquidate any LIFO-based inventory.
The gas marketing services, wholesale gas services, and all other segments record inventory at LOCOM, with cost determined on a WACOG basis. For these segments, the Company evaluates the weighted average cost of its natural gas inventories against market prices to determine whether any declines in market prices below the WACOG are other than temporary. For any declines considered to be other than temporary, the Company recorded the following LOCOM adjustments to cost of natural gas to reduce the value of its natural gas inventories to market value.

NOTES (continued)
Southern Company Gas and Subsidiary Companies 2017 Annual Report


 Successor  Predecessor
 2017 July 1, 2016 to December 31, 2016  January 1, 2016 to June 30, 2016 2015
 (in millions)  (in millions)
Gas marketing services$
 $
  $
 $3
Wholesale gas services2
 1
  3
 19
All other
 
  
 1
Total LOCOM adjustments$2
 $1
  $3
 $23
Fair Value Measurements
The Company has financial and nonfinancial assets and liabilities subject to fair value measurement. The financial assets and liabilities measured and carried at fair value include cash and cash equivalents and derivative instruments. The carrying values of receivables, short and long-term investments, accounts payable, short-term debt, other current assets and liabilities, and accrued interest approximate their respective fair value. The nonfinancial assets and liabilities include pension and other postretirement benefits. See Notes 2 and 9 for additional fair value disclosures.
Fair value is the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date (exit price). The Company utilizes market data or assumptions that market participants would use in valuing the asset or liability, including assumptions about risk and the risks inherent in the inputs to the valuation technique. These inputs can be readily observable, market corroborated, or generally unobservable. The Company primarily applies the market approach for recurring fair value measurements to utilize the best available information. Accordingly, the Company uses valuation techniques that maximize the use of observable inputs and minimize the use of unobservable inputs. Fair value balances are classified based on the observance of those inputs. The guidance establishes a fair value hierarchy that prioritizes the inputs used to measure fair value. The hierarchy gives the highest priority to unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities (Level 1) and the lowest priority to unobservable inputs (Level 3). The three levels of the fair value hierarchy defined by the guidance are as follows:
Level 1
Quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities as of the reporting date. Active markets are those in which transactions for the asset or liability occur in sufficient frequency and volume to provide pricing information on an ongoing basis. The Company's Level 1 items consist of exchange-traded derivatives, money market funds, and certain retirement plan assets.
Level 2
Pricing inputs are other than quoted prices in active markets included in Level 1, which are either directly or indirectly observable as of the reporting date. Level 2 includes those financial and commodity instruments that are valued using valuation methodologies. These methodologies are primarily industry-standard methodologies that consider various assumptions, including quoted forward prices for commodities, time value, volatility factors, and current market and contractual prices for the underlying instruments, as well as other relevant economic measures. Substantially all of these assumptions are observable in the marketplace throughout the full term of the instrument, can be derived from observable data, or are supported by observable levels at which transactions are executed in the marketplace. Market price data is obtained from multiple sources in order to value certain Level 2 transactions and this data is representative of transactions that occurred in the marketplace. Level 2 instruments include shorter tenor exchange-traded and non-exchange-traded derivatives such as over-the-counter (OTC) forwards and options and certain retirement plan assets.
Level 3
Pricing inputs include significant unobservable inputs that may be used with internally developed methodologies to determine management's best estimate of fair value from the perspective of market participants. Level 3 instruments include those that may be more structured or otherwise tailored to customers' needs. Level 3 assets, liabilities, and any applicable transfers are primarily related to the Company's pension and other postretirement benefit plan assets as described in Note 2. Transfers into and out of Level 3 are determined using values at the end of the interim period in which the transfer occurred.
Financial Instruments
The Company uses derivative financial instruments to limit exposure to fluctuations in natural gas prices, weather, interest rates, and commodity prices. All derivative financial instruments are recognized as either assets or liabilities on the balance sheets (shown separately as "Risk Management Activities") and are measured at fair value. See Note 9 for additional information

NOTES (continued)
Southern Company Gas and Subsidiary Companies 2017 Annual Report


regarding fair value. Derivative contracts that qualify as cash flow hedges of anticipated transactions or are recoverable through the respective state regulatory agency approved fuel-hedging programs result in the deferral of related gains and losses in OCI or regulatory assets and liabilities, respectively, until the hedged transactions occur. Any ineffectiveness arising from cash flow hedges is recognized currently in net income. Cash flows from derivatives are classified on the statement of cash flows in the same category as the hedged item. See Note 10 for additional information regarding derivatives.
The Company offsets fair value amounts recognized for multiple derivative instruments executed with the same counterparty under a master netting arrangement. The Company had no outstanding collateral repayment obligations or rights to reclaim collateral arising from derivative instruments recognized at December 31, 2017.
The Company enters into weather derivative contracts as economic hedges of natural gas revenues in the event of warmer-than-normal weather in the Heating Season. Exchange-traded options are carried at fair value, with changes reflected in natural gas revenues. Non-exchange-traded options are accounted for using the intrinsic value method. Changes in the intrinsic value for non-exchange-traded contracts are also reflected in natural gas revenues in the statements of income.
Wholesale gas services purchases natural gas for storage when the current market price paid to buy and transport natural gas plus the cost to store and finance the natural gas is less than the market price that can be received in the future, resulting in positive net natural gas revenues. NYMEX futures and OTC contracts are used to sell natural gas at that future price to substantially protect the natural gas revenues that will ultimately be realized when the stored natural gas is sold. The Company enters into transactions to secure transportation capacity between delivery points in order to serve its customers and various markets. NYMEX futures and OTC contracts are used to capture the price differential or spread between the locations served by the capacity in order to substantially protect the natural gas revenues that will ultimately be realized when the physical flow of natural gas between delivery points occurs. These contracts generally meet the definition of derivatives and are carried at fair value on the balance sheets, with changes in fair value recorded in natural gas revenues on the statements of income in the period of change. These contracts are not designated as hedges for accounting purposes.
The purchase, transportation, storage, and sale of natural gas are accounted for on a weighted average cost or accrual basis, as appropriate, rather than on the fair value basis utilized for the derivatives used to mitigate the natural gas price risk associated with the storage and transportation portfolio. Monthly demand charges are incurred for the contracted storage and transportation capacity and payments associated with asset management agreements, and these demand charges and payments are recognized on the statements of income in the period they are incurred. This difference in accounting methods can result in volatility in reported earnings, even though the economic margin is substantially unchanged from the dates the transactions were consummated.
The Company is exposed to potential losses related to financial instruments in the event of counterparties' nonperformance. The Company has established controls to determine and monitor the creditworthiness of counterparties in order to mitigate the Company's exposure to counterparty credit risk.
Comprehensive Income
The objective of comprehensive income is to report a measure of all changes in common stock equity of an enterprise that result from transactions and other economic events of the period other than transactions with owners. Comprehensive income consists of net income, changes in the fair value of qualifying cash flow hedges, certain changes in pension and other postretirement benefit plans, and reclassifications for amounts included in net income.
Non-Wholly Owned Entities
The Company holds ownership interests in a number of business ventures with varying ownership structures and evaluates all of its partnership interests and other variable interests to determine if each entity is a VIE. If a venture is a VIE for which the Company is the primary beneficiary, the assets, liabilities, and results of operations of the entity are consolidated. The Company reassesses its conclusion as to whether an entity is a VIE upon certain occurrences, which are deemed reconsideration events under the guidance. See Note 4 under "Variable Interest Entities" for additional information.
For entities that are not determined to be VIEs, the Company evaluates whether it has control or significant influence over the investee to determine the appropriate consolidation and presentation. Generally, entities under the control of the Company are consolidated, and entities over which the Company can exert significant influence, but does not control, are accounted for under the equity method of accounting. However, the Company also invests in partnerships and limited liability companies that maintain separate ownership accounts. All such investments are required to be accounted for under the equity method unless the interest is so minor that there is virtually no influence over operating and financial policies, as are all investments in joint ventures.
Investments accounted for under the equity method are recorded within equity investments in unconsolidated subsidiaries within the other property and investments section in the balance sheets and the equity income is recorded within earnings from equity

NOTES (continued)
Southern Company Gas and Subsidiary Companies 2017 Annual Report


method investments within the other income (expense) section in the statements of income. See Note 4 under "Equity Method Investments" for additional information.
2. RETIREMENT BENEFITS
The Company has a qualified defined benefit, trusteed, pension plan covering most eligible employees, which was closed in 2012 to new employees and reopened to all non-union employees on January 1, 2018. The qualified pension plan is funded in accordance with requirements of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974, as amended (ERISA). No contributions to the qualified pension plan were made for the year ended December 31, 2017 and no mandatory contributions to the qualified pension plan are anticipated for the year ending December 31, 2018. The Company also provides certain non-qualified defined benefit and defined contribution pension plans for a selected group of management and highly compensated employees. Benefits under these non-qualified pension plans are funded on a cash basis. In addition, the Company provides certain medical care and life insurance benefits for eligible retired employees through a postretirement benefit plan. The Company also has a separate unfunded supplemental retirement health care plan that provides medical care and life insurance benefits to employees of discontinued businesses. For the year ending December 31, 2018, no other postretirement trust contributions are expected.
In connection with the Merger, the Company performed updated valuations of its pension and other postretirement benefit plan assets and obligations to reflect actual census data at the new measurement date of July 1, 2016. This valuation resulted in increases to the projected benefit obligations for the pension and other postretirement benefit plans of approximately $177 million and $20 million, respectively, a decrease in the fair value of pension plan assets of $10 million, and an increase in the fair value of other postretirement benefit plan assets of $1 million. The Company also recorded a related regulatory asset of $437 million related to unrecognized prior service cost and actuarial gain/loss, as it is probable that this amount will be recovered through future rates for the natural gas distribution utilities. The previously unrecognized prior service cost and actuarial gain/loss related to non-utility subsidiaries were eliminated through purchase accounting adjustments.
Actuarial Assumptions
The weighted average rates assumed in the actuarial calculations used to determine both the net periodic costs for the pension and other postretirement benefit plans for all periods presented and the benefit obligations as of the measurement date are presented below.
 Successor  Predecessor
Assumptions used to determine net periodic costs:Year ended December 31, 2017July 1, 2016 through December 31, 2016  January 1, 2016 through June 30, 2016Year ended December 31, 2015
Pension plans      
Discount rate – interest costs(a)
3.76%3.21%  4.00%4.20%
Discount rate – service costs(a)
4.64
4.07
  4.80
4.20
Expected long-term return on plan assets7.60
7.75
  7.80
7.80
Annual salary increase3.50
3.50
  3.70
3.70
Pension band increase(b)
N/A
2.00
  2.00
2.00
Other postretirement benefit plans 
 
    
Discount rate – interest costs(a)
3.40%2.84%  3.60%4.00%
Discount rate – service costs(a)
4.55
3.96
  4.70
4.00
Expected long-term return on plan assets6.03
5.93
  6.60
7.80
Annual salary increase3.50
3.50
  3.70
3.70
(a)Effective January 1, 2016, the Company uses a spot rate approach to estimate the service cost and interest cost components. Previously, the Company estimated these components using a single weighted average discount rate.
(b)Only applicable to Nicor Gas union employees. The pension bands for the former Nicor plan reflect the negotiated rates in accordance with the union agreements.

NOTES (continued)
Southern Company Gas and Subsidiary Companies 2017 Annual Report


Assumptions used to determine benefit obligations:2017 2016
Pension plans   
Discount rate3.74% 4.39%
Annual salary increase2.88
 3.50
Pension band increase(*)
N/A
 2.00
Other postretirement benefit plans 
  
Discount rate3.62% 4.15%
Annual salary increase2.56
 3.50
(*)Only applicable to Nicor Gas union employees. The pension bands for the former Nicor plan reflect the negotiated rates in accordance with the union agreements.
The Company estimates the expected return on pension plan and other postretirement benefit plan assets by evaluating expected bond returns, equity risk premiums, asset allocations, the effects of active plan management, the impact of periodic plan asset rebalancing, and historical performance. The Company also considers guidance from its investment advisors in making a final determination of its expected rate of return on assets. To the extent the actual rate of return on assets realized over the course of a year is greater or less than the assumed rate, it does not affect that year's annual pension or other postretirement benefit plan cost; rather, this gain or loss reduces or increases future pension or other postretirement benefit plan costs.
An additional assumption used in measuring the accumulated other postretirement benefit obligations (APBO) was a weighted average medical care cost trend rate. The weighted average medical care cost trend rates used in measuring the APBO as of December 31, 2017 were as follows:
 Initial Cost Trend Rate Ultimate Cost Trend Rate Year That Ultimate Rate is Reached
Pre-656.40% 4.50% 2038
Post-65 medical7.80
 4.50
 2038
Post-65 prescription7.80
 4.50
 2038
An annual increase or decrease in the assumed medical care cost trend rate of 1% would affect the APBO and the service and interest cost components at December 31, 2017 as follows:
 1 Percent Increase 1 Percent Decrease
 (in millions)
Benefit obligation$11
 $(10)
Service and interest costs
 

NOTES (continued)
Southern Company Gas and Subsidiary Companies 2017 Annual Report


Pension Plans
The total accumulated benefit obligation for the pension plans was $1.1 billion at December 31, 2017 and $1.1 billion at December 31, 2016. Changes in the projected benefit obligations and the fair value of plan assets for all periods presented were as follows:
 Successor  Predecessor
 Year ended December 31, 2017 July 1, 2016 through December 31, 2016  January 1, 2016 through June 30, 2016
 (in millions)  (in millions)
Change in benefit obligation      
Benefit obligation at beginning of period$1,133
 $1,244
` $1,067
Service cost23
 15
  13
Interest cost42
 20
  21
Plan amendments(26) 
  
Benefits paid(91) (31)  (26)
Actuarial (gain) loss103
 (115)  169
Balance at end of period1,184
 1,133
  1,244
Change in plan assets      
Fair value of plan assets at beginning of period983
 837
` 847
Actual return (loss) on plan assets175
 48
  15
Employer contributions1
 129
  1
Benefits paid(91) (31)  (26)
Fair value of plan assets at end of period1,068
 983
  837
Accrued liability$116
 $150
  $407
At December 31, 2017, the projected benefit obligations for the qualified and non-qualified pension plans were $1.1 billion and $44 million, respectively. All pension plan assets are related to the qualified pension plan.
Amounts recognized in the balance sheets at December 31, 2017 and 2016 related to the Company's pension plans consist of the following:
 2017 2016
 (in millions)
Other regulatory assets, deferred$217
 $267
Other deferred charges and assets85
 58
Other current liabilities(3) (2)
Employee benefit obligations(198) (206)

NOTES (continued)
Southern Company Gas and Subsidiary Companies 2017 Annual Report


Presented below are the amounts included in accumulated OCI and regulatory assets at December 31, 2017 and 2016 related to the defined benefit pension plans that had not yet been recognized in net periodic pension cost along with the estimated amortization of such amounts for 2018.
 Regulatory Amortization Prior Service Cost Net (Gain) Loss
 
(in millions)

Balance at December 31, 2017:     
Accumulated OCI$
 $
 $(42)
Regulatory assets (liabilities)40
 (20) 197
Total$40
 $(20) $155
Balance at December 31, 2016:     
Accumulated OCI$
 $
 $(43)
Regulatory assets (liabilities)
 (2) 269
Total$
 $(2) $226
Estimated amortization in net periodic cost in 2018:     
Regulatory assets (liabilities)$3
 $(2) $16
The components of OCI and the changes in the balance of regulatory assets related to the defined benefit pension plans for all periods presented were as follows:
 Accumulated OCI Regulatory Assets
 (in millions)
Predecessor – Balance at December 31, 2015:$282
 $88
Reclassification adjustments:   
Amortization of prior service costs1
 
Amortization of net loss(9) (4)
Total reclassification adjustments(8) (4)
Total change(8) (4)
Predecessor – Balance at June 30, 2016:$274
 $84
    
    
Successor – Balance at July 1, 2016:$
 $368
Net (gain) loss(43) (87)
Reclassification adjustments:   
Amortization of prior service costs
 1
Amortization of net loss
 (15)
Total reclassification adjustments
 (14)
Total change(43) (101)
Successor – Balance at December 31, 2016:$(43) $267
Net (gain) loss1
 (31)
Reclassification adjustments:   
Amortization of regulatory assets
 (1)
Amortization of net loss
 (18)
Total reclassification adjustments
 (19)
Total change1
 (50)
Successor – Balance at December 31, 2017:$(42) $217

NOTES (continued)
Southern Company Gas and Subsidiary Companies 2017 Annual Report


Components of net periodic pension costs for all periods presented were as follows:
 Successor  Predecessor
 Year ended December 31, 2017 July 1, 2016 through December 31, 2016  January 1, 2016 through June 30, 2016 Year ended December 31, 2015
 (in millions)  (in millions)
Service cost$23
 $15
  $13
 $28
Interest cost42
 20
  21
 45
Expected return on plan assets(70) (35)  (33) (65)
Amortization of regulatory assets1
 
  
 
Amortization:        
Prior service costs
 (1)  (1) (2)
Net (gain)/loss18
 14
  13
 31
Net periodic pension cost$14
 $13
  $13
 $37
Net periodic pension cost is the sum of service cost, interest cost, and other costs netted against the expected return on plan assets. The expected return on plan assets is determined by multiplying the expected rate of return on plan assets and the market-related value of plan assets.
Future benefit payments reflect expected future service and are estimated based on assumptions used to measure the projected benefit obligation for the pension plans. At December 31, 2017, estimated benefit payments were as follows:
 Benefit Payments
 (in millions)
2018$100
201977
202079
202179
202280
2023 to 2027392

NOTES (continued)
Southern Company Gas and Subsidiary Companies 2017 Annual Report


Other Postretirement Benefits
Changes in the APBO and the fair value of plan assets for all periods presented were as follows:
 Successor  Predecessor
 Year ended December 31, 2017 July 1, 2016 through December 31, 2016  January 1, 2016 through June 30, 2016
 (in millions)  (in millions)
Change in benefit obligation      
Benefit obligation at beginning of period$308
 $338
  $318
Service cost2
 1
  1
Interest cost10
 5
  5
Benefits paid(19) (11)  (11)
Actuarial (gain) loss3
 (26)  24
Plan amendments3
 
  
Employee contributions3
 1
  1
Balance at end of period310
 308
  338
Change in plan assets      
Fair value of plan assets at beginning of period105
 100
  99
Actual return (loss) on plan assets20
 4
  1
Employee contributions3
 1
  1
Employer contributions17
 11
  10
Benefits paid(20) (11)  (11)
Fair value of plan assets at end of year125
 105
  100
Accrued liability$185
 $203
  $238
Amounts recognized in the balance sheets at December 31, 2017 and 2016 related to the Company's other postretirement benefit plans consist of the following:
  2017 2016
  (in millions)
Other regulatory assets, deferred $46
 $52
Employee benefit obligations (185) (203)
Presented below are the amounts included in accumulated OCI and regulatory assets at December 31, 2017 and 2016 related to the other postretirement benefit plans that had not yet been recognized in net periodic other postretirement benefit cost. The estimated amortization of such amounts for 2018 is immaterial.
 Regulatory Amortization Prior Service Cost Net (Gain) Loss
 (in millions)
Balance at December 31, 2017:     
Accumulated OCI$
 $
 $(3)
Regulatory assets (liabilities)6
 (7) 47
Total$6
 $(7) $44
Balance at December 31, 2016:     
Accumulated OCI$
 $
 $(3)
Regulatory assets (liabilities)
 (12) 64
Total$
 $(12) $61

NOTES (continued)
Southern Company Gas and Subsidiary Companies 2017 Annual Report


The components of OCI, along with the changes in the balance of regulatory assets (liabilities), related to the other postretirement benefit plans for all periods presented were as follows:
 Accumulated OCI Regulatory Assets
 (in millions)
Predecessor – Balance at December 31, 2015:$36
 $30
Net (gain) loss
 
Reclassification adjustments:   
Amortization of prior service costs
 1
Amortization of net loss(1) (1)
Total reclassification adjustments(1) 
Total change(1) 
Predecessor – Balance at June 30, 2016:$35
 $30
    
    
Successor – Balance at July 1, 2016:$
 $77
Net (gain) loss(3) (23)
Reclassification adjustments:   
Amortization of prior service costs
 1
Amortization of net loss
 (3)
Total reclassification adjustments
 (2)
Total change(3) (25)
Successor – Balance at December 31, 2016:$(3) $52
Net (gain) loss
 (5)
Reclassification adjustments:   
Amortization of prior service costs
 3
Amortization of net loss
 (4)
Total reclassification adjustments
 (1)
Total change
 (6)
Successor – Balance at December 31, 2017:$(3) $46
Components of the other postretirement benefit plans' net periodic cost for all periods presented were as follows:
 Successor  Predecessor
 Year ended December 31, 2017 July 1, 2016 through December 31, 2016  January 1, 2016 through June 30, 2016 Year ended December 31, 2015
 (in millions)  (in millions)
Service cost$2
 $1
  $1
 $2
Interest cost10
 5
  5
 13
Expected return on plan assets(7) (3)  (3) (7)
Amortization of regulatory assets
 2
  
 
Amortization:        
Prior service costs(3) 
  (1) (3)
Net (gain)/loss4
 
  2
 6
Net periodic postretirement benefit cost$6
 $5
  $4
 $11

NOTES (continued)
Southern Company Gas and Subsidiary Companies 2017 Annual Report


Future benefit payments, including prescription drug benefits, reflect expected future service and are estimated based on assumptions used to measure the APBO for the other postretirement benefit plans. At December 31, 2017, estimated benefit payments were as follows:
 Benefit Payments
 (in millions)
2018$20
201920
202021
202121
202222
2023 to 2027105
Benefit Plan Assets
Pension plan and other postretirement benefit plan assets are managed and invested in accordance with all applicable requirements, including ERISA and the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended. The Company's investment policies for both the pension plan and the other postretirement benefit plans cover a diversified mix of assets, including equity and fixed income securities, real estate, and private equity. The Company minimizes the risk of large losses primarily through diversification but also monitors and manages other aspects of risk.
The composition of the Company's pension plan and other postretirement benefit plan assets as of December 31, 2017 and 2016, along with the targets for each plan, is presented below:
  Target 2017 2016
Pension plan assets:      
Equity 53% 65% 69%
Fixed Income 15
 19
 20
Cash 2
 6
 1
Other 30
 10
 10
Balance at end of period 100% 100% 100%
Other postretirement benefit plan assets:      
Equity 72% 76% 74%
Fixed Income 24
 20
 23
Cash 1
 2
 1
Other 3
 2
 2
Total 100% 100% 100%
The investment strategy for plan assets related to the Company's qualified pension plan is to be broadly diversified across major asset classes. The asset allocation is established after consideration of various factors that affect the assets and liabilities of the pension plan including, but not limited to, historical and expected returns and interest rates, volatility, correlations of asset classes, the current level of assets and liabilities, and the assumed growth in assets and liabilities. Because a significant portion of the liability of the pension plan is long-term in nature, the assets are invested consistent with long-term investment expectations for return and risk. To manage the actual asset class exposures relative to the target asset allocation, the Company employs a formal rebalancing program for its pension plan assets. As additional risk management, external investment managers and service providers are subject to written guidelines to ensure appropriate and prudent investment practices. Management believes the portfolio is well-diversified with no significant concentrations of risk.

NOTES (continued)
Southern Company Gas and Subsidiary Companies 2017 Annual Report


Investment Strategies
Detailed below is a description of the investment strategies for the successor period for each major asset category for the pension and other postretirement benefit plans disclosed above:
Domestic equity. A mix of large and small capitalization stocks with generally an equal distribution of value and growth attributes, managed both actively and through passive index approaches.
International equity. A mix of growth stocks and value stocks with both developed and emerging market exposure, managed both actively and through passive index approaches.
Fixed income. A mix of domestic and international bonds.
Special situations. Investments in opportunistic strategies with the objective of diversifying and enhancing returns and exploiting short-term inefficiencies as well as investments in promising new strategies of a longer-term nature.
Real estate investments. Investments in traditional private market, equity-oriented investments in real properties (indirectly through pooled funds or partnerships) and in publicly traded real estate securities.
Private equity. Investments in private partnerships that invest in private or public securities typically through privately-negotiated and/or structured transactions, including leveraged buyouts, venture capital, and distressed debt.
The investment strategies for the predecessor periods followed a policy to preserve the plans' capital and maximize investment earnings in excess of inflation within acceptable levels of capital market volatility. To accomplish this goal, the plans' assets were managed to optimize long-term return while maintaining a high standard of portfolio quality and diversification. In developing the allocation policy for the assets of the pension and other postretirement benefit plans, the Company examined projections of asset returns and volatility over a long-term horizon. In connection with this analysis, the risk and return trade-offs of alternative asset classes and asset mixes were evaluated given long-term historical relationships as well as prospective capital market returns. The Company also conducted asset-liability studies to match projected asset growth with projected liability growth to determine whether there is sufficient liquidity for projected benefit payments. Asset mix guidelines were developed by incorporating the results of these analyses with an assessment of the Company's risk posture, and taking into account industry practices. The Company periodically evaluated its investment strategy to ensure that plan assets were sufficient to meet the benefit obligations of the plans. As part of the ongoing evaluation, the Company made changes to its targeted asset allocations and investment strategy.
Benefit Plan Asset Fair Values
Following are the fair value measurements for the pension plan and the other postretirement benefit plan assets as of December 31, 2017 and 2016. The fair values presented are prepared in accordance with GAAP. For purposes of determining the fair value of the pension plan and other postretirement benefit plan assets and the appropriate level designation for the successor period, management relies on information provided by the plan's trustee. This information is reviewed and evaluated by management with changes made to the trustee information as appropriate. Management believes the portfolio is well-diversified with no significant concentrations of risk.
Valuation methods of the primary fair value measurements disclosed in the following tables are as follows:
Domestic and international equity.Investments in equity securities such as common stocks, American depositary receipts, and real estate investment trusts that trade on a public exchange are classified as Level 1 investments and are valued at the closing price in the active market. Equity investments with unpublished prices (i.e. pooled funds) are valued as Level 2, when the underlying holdings used to value the investment are comprised of Level 1 or Level 2 equity securities.
Fixed income.Investments in fixed income securities are generally classified as Level 2 investments and are valued based on prices reported in the market place. Additionally, the value of fixed income securities takes into consideration certain items such as broker quotes, spreads, yield curves, interest rates, and discount rates that apply to the term of a specific instrument.
Real estate investments, private equity, and special situations investments.Investments in real estate, private equity, and special situations are generally classified as Net Asset Value as a Practical Expedient, since the underlying assets typically do not have publicly available observable inputs. The fund manager values the assets using various inputs and techniques depending on the nature of the underlying investments. Techniques may include purchase multiples for comparable transactions, comparable public company trading multiples, discounted cash flow analysis, prevailing market capitalization rates, recent sales of comparable investments, and independent third-party appraisals. The fair value of partnerships is determined by aggregating the value of the underlying assets less liabilities.

NOTES (continued)
Southern Company Gas and Subsidiary Companies 2017 Annual Report


The fair values of pension plan assets as of December 31, 2017 and 2016 are presented below. These fair value measurements exclude cash, receivables related to investment income, pending investments sales, and payables related to pending investment purchases. For 2017 and 2016, special situations (absolute return and hedge funds) investment assets are presented in the table below based on the nature of the investment.
 Fair Value Measurements Using  
 
Quoted Prices
in Active Markets for Identical Assets
 Significant Other Observable Inputs Significant Unobservable Inputs Net Asset Value as a Practical Expedient  
As of December 31, 2017:(Level 1) (Level 2) (Level 3) (NAV) Total
 (in millions)
Assets:         
Domestic equity(*)
$155
 $323
 $
 $
 $478
International equity(*)

 166
 
 
 166
Fixed income:         
U.S. Treasury, government, and agency bonds
 85
 
 
 85
Corporate bonds
 39
 
 
 39
Cash equivalents and other84
 25
 
 48
 157
Real estate investments3
 
 
 16
 19
Private equity
 
 
 1
 1
Total$242
 $638
 $
 $65
 $945
(*)Level 1 securities consist of actively traded stocks while Level 2 securities consist of pooled funds.
 Fair Value Measurements Using    
 Quoted Prices in Active Markets for Identical Assets Significant Other Observable Inputs Significant Unobservable Inputs Net Asset Value as a Practical Expedient  
As of December 31, 2016: (Level 1) (Level 2) (Level 3) (NAV) Total
 (in millions)    
Assets:         
Domestic equity(*)
$142
 $343
 $
 $
 $485
International equity(*)

 185
 
 
 185
Fixed income:         
U.S. Treasury, government, and agency bonds
 85
 
 
 85
Corporate bonds
 41
 
 
 41
Pooled funds
 66
 
 
 66
Cash equivalents and other12
 5
 
 83
 100
Real estate investments4
 
 
 15
 19
Private equity
 
 
 2
 2
Total$158
 $725
 $
 $100
 $983
(*)Level 1 securities consist of actively traded stocks while Level 2 securities consist of pooled funds.

NOTES (continued)
Southern Company Gas and Subsidiary Companies 2017 Annual Report


The fair values of other postretirement benefit plan assets as of December 31, 2017 and 2016 are presented below. These fair value measurements exclude cash, receivables related to investment income, pending investments sales, and payables related to pending investment purchases. For 2017 and 2016, special situations (absolute return and hedge funds) investment assets are presented in the table below based on the nature of the investment.
 Fair Value Measurements Using  
 Quoted Prices in Active Markets for Identical Assets Significant Other Observable Inputs Significant Unobservable Inputs Net Asset Value as a Practical Expedient  
As of December 31, 2017:(Level 1) (Level 2) (Level 3) (NAV) Total
 (in millions)
Assets:         
Domestic equity(*)
$3
 $69
 $
 $
 $72
International equity(*)

 22
 
 
 22
Fixed income:        

Pooled funds
 24
 
 
 24
Cash equivalents and other2
 
 
 1
 3
Total$5
 $115
 $
 $1
 $121
(*)Level 1 securities consist of actively traded stocks while Level 2 securities consist of pooled funds.
 Fair Value Measurements Using    
 Quoted Prices in Active Markets for Identical Assets Significant Other Observable Inputs Significant Unobservable Inputs Net Asset Value as a Practical Expedient  
As of December 31, 2016: (Level 1) (Level 2) (Level 3) (NAV) Total
 (in millions)    
Assets:         
Domestic equity(*)
$3
 $58
 $
 $
 $61
International equity(*)

 18
 
 
 18
Fixed income:         
Pooled funds
 23
 
 
 23
Cash equivalents and other1
 
 
 2
 3
Total$4
 $99
 $
 $2
 $105
(*)Level 1 securities consist of actively traded stocks while Level 2 securities consist of pooled funds.
Employee Savings Plan
SCS sponsors 401(k) defined contribution plans covering certain eligible Southern Company Gas employees. Through December 31, 2017, the 401(k) plans provided matching contributions of either 65% on up to 8% of an employee's eligible compensation, or a 100% matching contribution on up to 3% of an employee's eligible compensation, followed by a 75% matching contribution on up to the next 3% of an employee's eligible compensation. Total matching contributions made to the 401(k) plans for the successor periods ended December 31, 2017 and 2016 were $17 million and $8 million, respectively, and for the predecessor periods ended June 30, 2016 and December 31, 2015 were $10 million and $16 million, respectively.
For employees not accruing a benefit under the pension plan, additional contributions made to the 401(k) plans for the successor period ended December 31, 2017 were $2 million, for the successor period ended December 31, 2016 were not material, and for the predecessor periods ended June 30, 2016 and December 31, 2015 were $2 million for each period.
Effective January 1, 2018, the 401(k) plans were merged into the Southern Company Employee Savings Plan, which is a defined contribution plan covering substantially all employees of the Company. Under this plan, the Company matches a portion of the first 6% of employee base salary contributions. The maximum Company match is 5.1% of an employee's base salary.

NOTES (continued)
Southern Company Gas and Subsidiary Companies 2017 Annual Report


3. CONTINGENCIES AND REGULATORY MATTERS
General Litigation Matters
Nicor Gas and Nicor Energy Services Company, wholly-owned subsidiaries of the Company, and Nicor Inc. were defendants in a putative class action initially filed in 2011 in the state court in Cook County, Illinois. The plaintiffs purported to represent a class of the customers who purchased the Gas Line Comfort Guard product from Nicor Energy Services Company and variously alleged that the marketing, sale, and billing of the Gas Line Comfort Guard product violated the Illinois Consumer Fraud and Deceptive Business Practices Act, constituting common law fraud and resulting in unjust enrichment of these entities. The plaintiffs sought, on behalf of the classes they purported to represent, actual and punitive damages, interest, costs, attorney fees, and injunctive relief. On February 8, 2017, the judge denied the plaintiffs' motion for class certification and the Company's motion for summary judgment. On March 7, 2017, the parties reached a settlement, which was finalized and effective on April 3, 2017. The settlement did not have a material impact on the Company's financial statements.
The Company is assessing its alleged involvement in an incident that occurred in one of its service territories that resulted in several deaths, injuries, and property damage. One of the Company's utilities has been named as one of the defendants in several lawsuits related to this incident. The Company has insurance that provides full coverage of any financial exposure in excess of $11 million that is related to this incident. During the successor period ended December 31, 2016 and the predecessor period ended December 31, 2015, the Company recorded reserves for substantially all of its potential exposure from these cases. The ultimate outcome of this matter cannot be determined at this time.
The Company is subject to certain claims and legal actions arising in the ordinary course of business. The ultimate outcome of these matters and such pending or potential litigation against the Company cannot be determined at this time; however, for current proceedings not specifically reported herein, management does not anticipate that the ultimate liabilities, if any, arising from such current proceedings would have a material effect on the Company's financial statements.
Environmental Matters
The Company's operations are regulated by state and federal environmental agencies through a variety of laws and regulations governing air, water, land, and protection of other natural resources. The Company maintains a comprehensive environmental compliance strategy to assess upcoming requirements and compliance costs associated with these environmental laws and regulations. The costs, including capital expenditures and operations and maintenance costs, required to comply with environmental laws and regulations impact future results of operations, cash flows, and financial condition. Compliance costs may result from the installation of additional environmental controls. Compliance with these environmental requirements involves significant capital and operating costs to clean up affected sites. The Company conducts studies to determine the extent of any required clean up and has recognized in its financial statements the costs to clean up known impacted sites. The natural gas distribution utilities in Illinois, New Jersey, Georgia, and Florida have each received authority from their applicable state regulatory agencies to recover approved environmental compliance costs through regulatory mechanisms.
The Company is subject to environmental remediation liabilities associated with 46 former MGP sites in five different states. Accrued environmental remediation costs of $388 million and $426 million have been recorded in the balance sheets as of December 31, 2017 and 2016, respectively. These environmental remediation expenditures are recoverable from customers through rate mechanisms approved by the applicable state regulatory agencies, with the exception of one site representing $2 million of the accrued remediation costs.
In 2015, the EPA filed an administrative complaint and notice of opportunity for hearing against Nicor Gas. The complaint alleged violation of the regulatory requirements applicable to polychlorinated biphenyls in the Nicor Gas distribution system and the EPA sought a total civil penalty of $0.3 million. On January 26, 2017, the EPA notified Nicor Gas that it agreed to voluntarily dismiss its administrative complaint with prejudice and without payment of a civil penalty or other further obligation on the part of Nicor Gas.
The Company's ultimate environmental compliance strategy and future environmental capital expenditures will be affected by the final requirements of new or revised environmental regulations and the outcome of any legal challenges to the environmental rules. The ultimate outcome of these matters cannot be determined at this time.
FERC Matters
At December 31, 2017, gas midstream operations was involved in two gas pipeline construction projects. These projects, along with the Company's existing pipelines, are intended to provide diverse sources of natural gas supplies to customers, resolve current and long-term supply planning for new capacity, enhance system reliability, and generate economic development in the

NOTES (continued)
Southern Company Gas and Subsidiary Companies 2017 Annual Report


areas served. On October 13, 2017, the Atlantic Coast Pipeline project received FERC approval. On January 19, 2018, the PennEast Pipeline project received FERC approval.
Additionally, on August 1, 2017, the Dalton Pipeline was placed in service as authorized by the FERC and transportation service for customers commenced. See Note 4 for additional information.
Regulatory Matters
Regulatory Infrastructure Programs
The Company has infrastructure improvement programs at several of its utilities. Descriptions of these programs are as follows:
Nicor Gas
In 2013, Illinois enacted legislation that allows Nicor Gas to provide more widespread safety and reliability enhancements to its distribution system. The legislation stipulates that rate increases to customers as a result of any infrastructure investments shall not exceed a cumulative annual average of 4.0% or, in any given year, 5.5%, of base rate revenues. In 2014, the Illinois Commission approved the nine-year regulatory infrastructure program, Investing in Illinois, under which Nicor Gas implemented rates that became effective in March 2015.
Investing in Illinois is subject to annual review by the Illinois Commission. In conjunction with the base rate case order issued by the Illinois Commission on January 31, 2018, Nicor Gas is recovering the portion of these program costs incurred prior to December 31, 2017 through base rates. See "Base Rate Cases" herein for additional information.
Atlanta Gas Light
Atlanta Gas Light's STRIDE program, which was initially approved by the Georgia PSC in 2009, is comprised of the Integrated System Reinforcement Program (i-SRP), the Integrated Customer Growth Program (i-CGP), and the Integrated Vintage Plastic Replacement Program (i-VPR) and consists of infrastructure development, enhancement, and replacement programs that are used to update and expand distribution systems and LNG facilities, improve system reliability, and meet operational flexibility and growth. For 2017 and subsequent years, the recovery of and return on current and future capital investments under the STRIDE program are included in the annual base rate revenue adjustment under GRAM.
The i-CGP program authorized Atlanta Gas Light to spend $91 million through 2017 on projects to extend its pipeline facilities to serve customers in areas without pipeline access and create new economic development opportunities in Georgia. This program ended in 2017 and was replaced with a tariff to provide up to $15 million annually for Atlanta Gas Light to commit to strategic economic development projects.
The i-SRP program authorized $445 million of capital spending through 2017 for projects to upgrade Atlanta Gas Light's distribution system and LNG facilities in Georgia, improve its peak-day system reliability and operational flexibility, and create a platform to meet long-term forecasted growth. In August 2016, Atlanta Gas Light filed a petition with the Georgia PSC for approval of a four-year extension of its i-SRP seeking approval to invest an additional $177 million to improve and upgrade its core gas distribution system in years 2017 through 2020.
The i-VPR program authorized Atlanta Gas Light to spend $275 million through 2017 to replace 756 miles of aging plastic pipe that was installed primarily in the mid-1960s to the early 1980s. Atlanta Gas Light has identified approximately 3,300 miles of vintage plastic mains in its system that should be considered for potential replacement.
See "Base Rate Cases" herein for additional information.
The orders for the STRIDE programs provide for recovery of all prudent costs incurred in the performance of the program. Atlanta Gas Light will recover from end-use customers, through billings to Marketers, the costs related to the programs net of any cost savings from the programs. The regulatory asset represents recoverable incurred costs related to the programs that will be collected in future rates charged to customers through the rate riders. The future expected costs to be recovered through rates related to allowed, but not incurred costs, are recognized in an unrecognized ratemaking amount that is not reflected on the balance sheets. This allowed cost is primarily the equity return on the capital investment under the program. See "Unrecognized Ratemaking Amounts"herein for additional information.
Atlanta Gas Light capitalizes and depreciates the capital expenditure costs incurred from the STRIDE programs over the life of the assets. Operations and maintenance costs are expensed as incurred. Recoveries, which are recorded as revenue, are based on a formula that allows Atlanta Gas Light to recover operations and maintenance costs in excess of those included in its current base rates, depreciation, and an allowed rate of return on capital expenditures. However, Atlanta Gas Light is allowed the recovery of carrying costs on the under recovered balance resulting from the timing difference.

NOTES (continued)
Southern Company Gas and Subsidiary Companies 2017 Annual Report


Elizabethtown Gas
Elizabethtown Gas' 2013 extension of the Aging Infrastructure Replacement (AIR) enhanced infrastructure program allowed for infrastructure investment of $115 million over four years and was focused on the replacement of aging cast iron in its pipeline system. Carrying charges on the additional capital spend are being accrued and deferred for regulatory purposes at a weighted average cost of capital of 6.65%. Effective July 1, 2017, investments under this program, which ended September 30, 2017, are being recovered through base rate revenues. See "Base Rate Cases" herein for additional information.
In 2015, Elizabethtown Gas filed the Safety, Modernization and Reliability Tariff plan with the New Jersey BPU seeking approval to invest more than $1.1 billion to replace 630 miles of vintage cast iron, steel, and copper pipeline, as well as 240 regulator stations. During the first quarter 2018, Elizabethtown Gas withdrew this filing in response to a proposed rule by the New Jersey BPU to incentivize utilities to accelerate investment in infrastructure replacement programs that enhance reliability, resiliency, and/or safety of the distribution system. The ultimate outcome of this matter cannot be determined at this time.
Virginia Natural Gas
In 2012, the Virginia Commission approved the Steps to Advance Virginia's Energy (SAVE) program, an accelerated infrastructure replacement program, to be completed over a five-year period. This program included a maximum allowance for capital expenditures of $25 million per year, not to exceed $105 million in total.
In March 2016, the Virginia Commission approved an extension to the SAVE program for Virginia Natural Gas to replace more than 200 miles of aging pipeline infrastructure and invest up to $30 million in 2016 and up to $35 million annually through 2021.
The SAVE program is subject to annual review by the Virginia Commission. In conjunction with the base rate case order issued by the Virginia Commission on December 21, 2017, Virginia Natural Gas is recovering the portion of these program costs incurred prior to September 1, 2017 through base rates. See "Base Rate Cases" herein for additional information.
Florida City Gas
In 2015, the Florida PSC approved Florida City Gas' Safety, Access, and Facility Enhancement program, under which costs incurred for replacing aging pipes are recovered through a rate rider with annual adjustments and true-ups. Under the program, Florida City Gas is authorized to spend $105 million over a 10-year period on infrastructure relocation and enhancement projects.
PRP Settlement
In 2015, Atlanta Gas Light received a final order from the Georgia PSC for a rate true-up of allowed unrecovered revenue through 2014 related to its PRP. This order allows Atlanta Gas Light to recover $144 million of the $178 million previously unrecovered program revenue. The remaining $34 million requested related primarily to previously unrecognized ratemaking amounts and did not have a material impact on the Company's financial statements. The Company also recognized $1 million of interest expense and $5 million in operations and maintenance expense related to the PRP on the Company's statements of income for the predecessor year ended December 31, 2015. See "Unrecognized Ratemaking Amounts"herein for additional information.
As a result of the PRP settlement, Atlanta Gas Light began recovering incremental PRP surcharge amounts through three phased in increases in addition to its previously existing PRP surcharge amount, which was established to address recovery of the unrecovered PRP balance of $144 million in 2015 and the estimated amounts to be earned under the program through 2025. The initial incremental surcharge of approximately $15 million annually was effective in October 2015, with additional annual increases of approximately $15 million in each of October 2016 and 2017. The final increase scheduled for October 2017 was included in the implementation of GRAM in March 2017. The under recovered balance is the result of the continued revenue requirement earned under the program offset by the existing and incremental PRP surcharges. The unrecovered balance at December 31, 2017 was $187 million, including $104 million of unrecognized equity return. The PRP surcharge will remain in effect until the earlier of the full recovery of the under recovered amount or December 31, 2025. See "Base Rate Cases" herein for additional information on GRAM.
One of the capital projects under the PRP experienced construction issues and Atlanta Gas Light was required to complete mitigation work prior to placing it in service. These mitigation costs will be included in future base rates in 2018. Provisions in the order resulted in the recognition of $5 million in operations and maintenance expense for the predecessor year ended December 31, 2015 on the Company's statements of income. In 2017, Atlanta Gas Light recovered $20 million from the settlement of contractor litigation claims and continues to pursue contractual and legal claims against a third-party contractor. Mitigation costs recovered through the legal process are retained by Atlanta Gas Light. The ultimate outcome of this matter cannot be determined at this time.

NOTES (continued)
Southern Company Gas and Subsidiary Companies 2017 Annual Report


Base Rate Cases
Settled Base Rate Cases
On February 21, 2017, the Georgia PSC approved GRAM and a $20 million increase in annual base rate revenues for Atlanta Gas Light, effective March 1, 2017. GRAM adjusts base rates annually, up or down, using an earnings band based on the previously approved ROE of 10.75% and does not collect revenue through special riders and surcharges. Atlanta Gas Light adjusts rates up to
the lower end of the band of 10.55% and adjusts rates down to the higher end of the band of 10.95%. Various infrastructure programs previously authorized by the Georgia PSC under Atlanta Gas Light's STRIDE program, which include the i-VPR and i-SRP, will continue under GRAM and the recovery of and return on the infrastructure program investments will be included in annual base rate adjustments. The Georgia PSC will review Atlanta Gas Light's performance annually under GRAM.
Pursuant to the GRAM approval, Atlanta Gas Light and the staff of the Georgia PSC agreed to a variation to the i-CGP that was formerly part of Atlanta Gas Light's STRIDE program. As a result, a new tariff was created, effective October 10, 2017, to provide up to $15 million annually for Atlanta Gas Light to commit to strategic economic development projects. Projects under this tariff must be approved by the Georgia PSC.
Beginning with the next rate adjustment in June 2018, Atlanta Gas Light's recovery of the previously unrecovered Pipeline Replacement Program revenue through 2014, as well as the mitigation costs associated with the Pipeline Replacement Program that were not previously included in its rates, will also be included in GRAM. In connection with the GRAM approval, the last monthly Pipeline Replacement Program surcharge increase became effective March 1, 2017.
On June 30, 2017, the New Jersey BPU approved a settlement that provides for a $13 million increase in annual base rate revenues, effective July 1, 2017, based on a ROE of 9.6%. Also included in the settlement was a new composite depreciation rate that is expected to result in a $3 million annual reduction of depreciation. See Note 11 under "Proposed Sale of Elizabethtown Gas and Elkton Gas" for information on the proposed sale of Elizabethtown Gas.
On December 21, 2017, the Virginia Commission approved a settlement for a $34 million increase in annual base rate revenues, effective September 1, 2017, including $13 million related to the recovery of investments under the SAVE program. See "Regulatory Infrastructure Programs" herein for additional information. An authorized ROE range of 9.0% to 10.0% with a midpoint of 9.5% will be used to determine the revenue requirement in any filing, other than for a change in base rates.
On January 31, 2018, the Illinois Commission approved a $137 million increase in annual base rate revenues, including $93 million related to the recovery of investments under the Investing in Illinois program, effective February 8, 2018, based on a ROE of 9.8%.
Pending Base Rate Cases
On October 23, 2017, Florida City Gas filed a general base rate case with the Florida PSC requesting a $19 million increase in annual base rate revenues. On January 29, 2018, Florida City Gas filed an update to incorporate the effects of the Tax Reform Legislation that, if approved, would reduce the requested base rate revenues by $4 million. The requested increase is based on a 2018 projected test year and a ROE of 11.25%. The requested increase includes $3 million related to the recovery of investments under SAFE that are currently being recovered through a surcharge. Additionally, Florida City Gas requested an interim rate increase of $5 million annually that was approved and became effective January 12, 2018, subject to refund. The Florida PSC is expected to rule on the requested increase in mid-2018.
On December 1, 2017, Atlanta Gas Light filed its 2018 annual rate adjustment with the Georgia PSC. If approved, annual base rate revenues will increase by $22 million, effective June 1, 2018. Atlanta Gas Light will file a revised rate adjustment to incorporate the effects of the Tax Reform Legislation in the first quarter 2018. The Georgia PSC is expected to rule on the revised requested increase in the second quarter 2018.
On February 15, 2018, Chattanooga Gas filed a general base rate case with the Tennessee Public Utility Commission requesting a $7 million increase in annual base rate revenues. The requested increase, which incorporated the effects of the Tax Reform Legislation, was based on a projected test year ending June 30, 2019 and a ROE of 11.25%. The Tennessee Public Utility Commission is expected to rule on the requested increase in the third quarter 2018.
The ultimate outcome of these pending base rate cases cannot be determined at this time.
Other
The New Jersey BPU, Virginia Commission, Tennessee Public Utility Commission, and Maryland PSC each issued an order effective January 1, 2018 that requires utilities in their respective states to track as a regulatory liability the impact of the Tax Reform Legislation, including the reduction in the corporate income tax rate to 21% and the impact of excess deferred income

NOTES (continued)
Southern Company Gas and Subsidiary Companies 2017 Annual Report


taxes. The New Jersey BPU's order requires Elizabethtown Gas to file by March 2, 2018 proposed revised base rates with an April 1, 2018 interim effective date and a July 1, 2018 final effective date. Virginia Natural Gas will address the Virginia Commission's order in its Annual Information Filing, which will be filed by July 1, 2018. The Tennessee Public Utility Commission's order required Chattanooga Gas to file proposals to reduce rates or make other ratemaking adjustments to account for the impact of the Tax Reform Legislation. Chattanooga Gas made the required filing as part of its February 15, 2018 general base rate case filing. The Maryland PSC's order required Elkton Gas to file an explanation of the impact of the Tax Reform Legislation on its expenses and revenues, as well as when and how it expects to pass through to its customers those effects. Elkton Gas made the required filing on February 15, 2018 and will reduce annual base rates by $0.1 million effective April 1, 2018. Credits will be issued to customers for the impact of the Tax Reform Legislation from January 2018 through March 2018.
The Illinois Commission issued an order effective January 25, 2018 that requires utilities in the state to record the impacts of the Tax Reform Legislation, including the reduction in the corporate income tax rate to 21% and the impact of excess deferred income taxes, as a regulatory liability. On February 20, 2018, the Illinois Commission granted Nicor Gas' application for rehearing to file revised base rates and tariffs, which Nicor Gas expects to file by the end of the second quarter 2018.
The ultimate outcome of these matters cannot be determined at this time.
energySMART
In 2014, the Illinois Commission approved Nicor Gas' energySMART through 2017, which outlined energy efficiency program offerings and therm reduction goals, and subsequently extended the program to 2021. Through December 31, 2017, Nicor Gas spent $107 million of the initial authorized expenditure of $113 million. A new four-year program began on January 1, 2018, with an additional authorized expenditure of $160 million.
Unrecognized Ratemaking Amounts
The following table illustrates the Company's authorized ratemaking amounts that are not recognized on its balance sheets. These amounts are primarily composed of an allowed equity rate of return on assets associated with certain of the Company's regulatory infrastructure programs. These amounts will be recognized as revenues in the Company's financial statements in the periods they are billable to customers, the majority of which will be recovered by 2025.
 December 31, 2017 December 31, 2016
 (in millions)
Atlanta Gas Light$104
 $110
Virginia Natural Gas11
 11
Elizabethtown Gas(*)
8
 6
Nicor Gas2
 2
Total$125
 $129
(*) See Note 11 under "Proposed Sale of Elizabethtown Gas and Elkton Gas" for information on the pending asset sale.
Other Matters
A wholly-owned subsidiary of the Company owns and operates a natural gas storage facility consisting of two salt dome caverns in Louisiana. Periodic integrity tests are required in accordance with rules of the Louisiana Department of Natural Resources (DNR). In August 2017, in connection with an ongoing integrity project, updated seismic mapping indicated the proximity of one of the caverns to the edge of the salt dome may be less than the required minimum and could result in the Company retiring the cavern early. At December 31, 2017, the facility's property, plant, and equipment had a net book value of $112 million, of which the cavern itself represents approximately 20%. A potential early retirement of this cavern is dependent upon several factors including compliance with an order from the Louisiana DNR detailing the requirements to place the cavern back in service, which includes, among other things, obtaining core samples to determine the composition of the sheath surrounding the edge of the salt dome.
The cavern continues to maintain its pressures and overall structural integrity. These events were considered in connection with the Company's annual long-lived asset impairment analysis, which determined there was no impairment as of December 31, 2017. Any changes in results of monitoring activities, rates at which expiring capacity contracts are re-contracted, timing of placing the cavern back in service, or Louisiana DNR requirements could trigger impairment. Further, early retirement of the cavern could trigger impairment of other long-lived assets associated with the natural gas storage facility. The ultimate outcome of this matter cannot be determined at this time, but could have a material impact on the Company's financial statements.

NOTES (continued)
Southern Company Gas and Subsidiary Companies 2017 Annual Report


4. JOINT OWNERSHIP AGREEMENTS
In 2014, the Company entered into a construction and ownership arrangement associated with the Dalton Pipeline through which the Company has a 50% undivided ownership interest jointly with The Williams Companies, Inc. in the 115-mile Dalton Pipeline to serve as an extension of the Transco natural gas pipeline system into northwest Georgia. The Company also entered into an agreement to lease its 50% undivided ownership in the Dalton Pipeline that became effective when it was placed in service on August 1, 2017. Under the lease, the Company will receive approximately $26 million annually for an initial term of 25 years. The lessee is responsible for maintaining the pipeline during the lease term and for providing service to transportation customers under its FERC-regulated tariff. At December 31, 2017, the net book value of the Company's 50% share of the pipeline was $252 million and is reflected in total property, plant, and equipment in the balance sheet. At December 31, 2016, the net book value of the Company's 50% share of the pipeline was $124 million and is reflected in construction work in progress in the balance sheet.
Variable Interest Entities
SouthStar, previously a joint venture owned 85% by theSouthern Company Gas and 15% by Piedmont, was the only VIE for which theSouthern Company Gas was the primary beneficiary, prior to October 2016 when theSouthern Company Gas completed its purchase of Piedmont's remaining interest in SouthStar.
In 2015, Georgia Natural Gas Company (GNG), a 100%-owned, direct subsidiary of theSouthern Company Gas, notified Piedmont of its election, pursuant to a change in control of SouthStar, to purchase Piedmont's 15% interest in SouthStar at fair market value. This purchase was contingent upon the closing of the merger between Piedmont and Duke Energy Corporation (Duke Energy). In October 2016, after Piedmont and Duke Energy completed their merger, GNG completed its purchase of Piedmont's interest in SouthStar and paid a purchase price of $160 million and $15 million for Piedmont's share of SouthStar's 2016 earnings through the date of acquisition.
At December 31, 2015, theSouthern Company presented the noncontrolling interest related to Piedmont's interest in SouthStar as a component in equity. During the first quarter 2016, the Company reclassified its noncontrolling interest, whose redemption was beyond the Company's control, as a contingently redeemable noncontrolling interest. Upon Piedmont and Duke Energy obtaining the necessary merger approval, the Company deemed this noncontrolling interest to be mandatorily redeemable and reclassified it to a current liability during the third quarter 2016. The roll-forwards of the redeemable noncontrolling interest for the successor period of July 1, 2016 through December 31, 2016 and the predecessor period of January 1, 2016 through June 30, 2016 are detailed below:
Predecessor –(in millions)
Balance at December 31, 2015$
Reclassification of noncontrolling interest to contingently redeemable noncontrolling interest46
Net income attributable to noncontrolling interest14
Distribution to noncontrolling interest(19)
Balance at June 30, 2016$41
Successor –(in millions)
Balance at July 1, 2016$174
Reclassification of contingently redeemable noncontrolling interest to mandatorily redeemable
noncontrolling interest
(174)
Balance at December 31, 2016$
The Company'sGas' cash flows used for financing activities included SouthStar's distribution to Piedmont for its portion of SouthStar's annual earnings from the previous year, which generally occurred in the first quarter of each year. For the successor period of July 1, 2016 through December 31, 2016, SouthStar made a distribution of $15 million upon completion of the purchase of Piedmont's interest in SouthStar. For the predecessor periodsperiod of January 1, 2016 through June 30, 2016, and the year ended December 31, 2015, SouthStar distributed to Piedmont $19 million and $18 million, respectively.to Piedmont.
    Table of Contents                                Index to Financial Statements

COMBINED NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)
Southern Company Gas and Subsidiary Companies 20172018 Annual Report


Equity Method Investments
The carrying amounts of the Company'sSouthern Company Gas' equity method investments as ofat December 31, 20172018 and 20162017 and related income from those investments for the successor periods of the yearyears ended December 31, 2018 and 2017, andthe successor period of July 1, 2016 through December 31, 2016, and the predecessor periodsperiod of January 1, 2016 through June 30, 2016 and the year ended December 31, 2015 were as follows:
Balance Sheet InformationDecember 31, 2017  December 31, 2016
 (in millions)
SNG(*)
$1,262
  $1,394
Triton42
  44
Horizon Pipeline30
  30
PennEast Pipeline57
  22
Atlantic Coast Pipeline41
  33
Pivotal JAX LNG, LLC44
  16
Other1
  2
Total$1,477
  $1,541
Investment BalanceDecember 31, 2018 December 31, 2017
 (in millions)
SNG$1,261
 $1,262
PennEast Pipeline71
 57
Atlantic Coast Pipeline83
 41
Other123
 117
Total$1,538
 $1,477
(*)Includes a $104 million decrease at December 31, 2017 related to the impact of the Tax Reform Legislation and new income tax apportionment factors in several states resulting from the Company's inclusion in the consolidated Southern Company state tax filings.
Successor PredecessorSuccessor Predecessor
Income Statement InformationYear ended December 31, 2017 July 1, 2016 through December 31, 2016  January 1, 2016 through June 30, 2016 Year ended December 31, 2015
Earnings from Equity Method InvestmentsYear ended December 31, 2018 Year ended December 31, 2017 July 1, 2016 through December 31, 2016  January 1, 2016 through June 30, 2016
(in millions) (in millions)(in millions) (in millions)
SNG$88
 $56
  $
 $
$131
 $88
 $56
  $
Triton4
 2
  1
 4
Horizon Pipeline2
 1
  1
 2
PennEast Pipeline5
 6
 
  
Atlantic Coast Pipeline6
 1
  
 
7
 6
 1
  
PennEast Pipeline6
 
  
 
Other5
 6
 3
  2
Total$106
 $60
  $2
 $6
$148
 $106
 $60
  $2

NOTES (continued)
In 2016, Southern Company Gas, and Subsidiary Companies 2017 Annual Report


SNG
In September 2016, the Company, through a wholly-owned, indirect subsidiary, acquired a 50% equity interest in SNG, which is accounted for as an equity method investment. See Note 1115 under "Investment"Southern Company GasInvestment in SNG"SNG" for additional information. Selected financial information of SNG as ofat December 31, 20172018 and 20162017 and for the yearyears ended December 31, 2018 and 2017 and for the period September 1, 2016 through December 31, 2016 is as follows:
As of December 31,At December 31,
Balance Sheet Information2017 20162018 2017
(in millions)(in millions)
Current assets$82
 $95
$104
 $82
Property, plant, and equipment2,439
 2,451
2,606
 2,439
Deferred charges and other assets121
 129
121
 121
Total Assets$2,642
 $2,675
$2,831
 $2,642
      
Current liabilities$110
 $588
$103
 $110
Long-term debt1,102
 706
1,103
 1,102
Other deferred charges and other liabilities76
 22
212
 76
Total Liabilities$1,288
 $1,316
$1,418
 $1,288
      
Total Stockholders' Equity1,354
 1,359
$1,413
 $1,354
Total Liabilities and Stockholders' Equity$2,642
 $2,675
$2,831
 $2,642

COMBINED NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)
Southern Company and Subsidiary Companies 2018 Annual Report

Income Statement InformationYear ended December 31, 2017 September 1, 2016
through December 31, 2016
Year ended
December 31, 2018
 
Year ended
December 31, 2017
 September 1, 2016
through December 31, 2016
(in millions)(in millions)
Revenues$544
 $230
$604
 $544
 $230
Operating income246
 138
310
 242
 137
Net income$175
 $115
261
 175
 115
Other Investments
Triton
The Company has an investment in Triton, a cargo container leasing company, which is aggregated into its all other segment. Container equipment that is acquired by Triton is accounted for in tranches as defined in Triton's operating agreement and investors make capital contributions to Triton to invest in each of the tranches. As of December 31, 2017, the Company had invested in seven tranches established by Triton.
Horizon Pipeline
The Company owns aninterest in a joint venture with Natural Gas Pipeline Company of America that is regulated by the FERC. Horizon Pipeline operates a 70-mile natural gas pipeline from Joliet, Illinois to near the Wisconsin/Illinois border. Nicor Gas typically contracts for 70% to 80% of the total annual capacity.
PennEast PipelinePipelines
In 2014, theSouthern Company Gas entered into a partnership in which it holds a 20% ownership interest in the PennEast Pipeline, an interstate pipeline company formed to develop and operate a 118-mile natural gas pipeline between New Jersey and Pennsylvania. The initial transportation capacity of 1.0 billion cubic feet (Bcf)Bcf per day, is under long-term contracts, mainly bywith public utilities and other market-serving entities, such as electric generation companies, in New Jersey, Pennsylvania, and New York. On January 19, 2018, the PennEast Pipeline project received FERC approval.

NOTES (continued)
Also in 2014, Southern Company Gas and Subsidiary Companies 2017 Annual Report


Atlantic Coast Pipeline
In 2014, the Company entered into a project in which it holds a 5% ownership interest in the Atlantic Coast Pipeline, an interstate pipeline company formed to develop and operate a 594-mile natural gas pipeline in North Carolina, Virginia, and West Virginia with initial transportation capacity of 1.5 Bcf per day. On October 13, 2017, the Atlantic Coast Pipeline project received FERC approval.
See Note 2 under "FERC Matters – Southern Company Gas" for additional information on these pipeline projects.
Pivotal JAX LNG, LLC
TheSouthern Company Gas owns a 50% interest in a planned LNG liquefaction and storage facility in Jacksonville, Florida. Once construction is complete and theFlorida, which was placed in service in October 2018. This facility is operational, it will be outfitted with a 2.0 million gallon storage tank with the capacity to produce in excess of 120,000 gallons of LNG per day.

COMBINED NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)
Southern Company and Subsidiary Companies 2018 Annual Report

8. FINANCING
5. INCOME TAXESSecurities Due Within One Year
A summary of long-term securities due within one year at each of December 31, 2018 and 2017 is as follows:
 December 31, 2018
 Southern CompanyAlabama PowerGeorgia
Power
Mississippi PowerSouthern PowerSouthern Company Gas
 (in millions)
Senior notes$2,950
$200
$500
$
$600
$300
Revenue bonds(a)
173

108
40


First mortgage bonds50




50
Capitalized leases24
1
13



Other(b)
1

(4)
(1)7
Total$3,198
$201
$617
$40
$599
$357
(a)For Southern Company and Mississippi Power, includes $40 million in pollution control revenue bonds classified as short term since they are variable rate demand obligations supported by short-term credit facilities; however, the final maturity dates range from 2020 to 2028.
(b)Represents unamortized debt related amounts, acquisition accounting fair value adjustments, and/or fair value hedges. See Note 14 for additional information regarding fair value hedges.
 December 31, 2017
 Southern CompanyGeorgia
Power
Mississippi PowerSouthern PowerSouthern Company Gas
 (in millions)
Senior notes$2,354
$750
$
$350
$155
Long-term bank term loans1,420
100
900
420

Revenue bonds(a)
90

90


Capitalized leases31
11



Other(b)
(3)(4)(1)
2
Total$3,892
$857
$989
$770
$157
(a)For Southern Company and Mississippi Power, includes $50 million in revenue bonds classified as short term at December 31, 2017 that were remarketed in an index rate mode subsequent to December 31, 2017. Also for Southern Company and Mississippi Power, includes $40 million in pollution control revenue bonds classified as short term since they are variable rate demand obligations supported by short-term credit facilities; however, the final maturity dates range from 2020 to 2028.
(b)Represents unamortized debt related amounts, acquisition accounting fair value adjustments, and fair value hedges. See Note 14 for additional information regarding fair value hedges.
Maturities of long-term debt for the next five years are as follows:
 
Southern Company(a)
Alabama Power
Georgia
Power(a)
Mississippi Power
Southern Power(b)
Southern Company
Gas
 (in millions)
2019$3,156
$200
$621
$
$600
$350
20204,041
250
1,006
307
825

20213,186
310
375
270
300
330
20221,974
750
505

677
46
20232,388
300
153

290
400
(a)
Amounts include principal amortization related to the FFB borrowings beginning in 2020; however, the final maturity date is February 20, 2044. See "Long-term DebtDOE Loan Guarantee Borrowings" herein for additional information.
(b)Southern Power's 2022 maturity represents euro-denominated debt at the U.S. dollar denominated hedge settlement amount.

COMBINED NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)
Southern Company and Subsidiary Companies 2018 Annual Report

Long-term Debt
Senior Notes
Total senior notes (including amounts due within one year) outstanding at December 31, 2018 and 2017 were as follows:
 
Southern
Company
(a)
Alabama PowerGeorgia
Power
Mississippi PowerSouthern Power
Southern Company
 Gas(b)
 (in millions)
December 31, 2018$32,725
$6,875
$5,600
$1,200
$5,050
$4,000
December 31, 201735,148
6,375
7,100
755
5,459
4,157
(a)Includes $10.0 billion and $10.2 billion of senior notes at the Southern Company parent entity at December 31, 2018 and 2017, respectively.
(b)
Represents senior notes issued by Southern Company Gas Capital, which are fully and unconditionally guaranteed by Southern Company Gas. See "Structural Considerations" herein for additional information.
See Note 14 for information regarding fair value hedges of existing senior notes.
Except as otherwise described herein, Southern Company and its subsidiaries used the proceeds of 2018 senior note issuances for long-term debt redemptions and maturities, to repay short-term indebtedness, and for general corporate purposes, including working capital. The subsidiaries also used the proceeds for their construction programs.
In August 2018, Southern Company issued $750 million aggregate principal amount of Series 2018A Floating Rate Senior Notes due February 14, 2020 bearing interest based on three-month LIBOR.
Subsequent to December 31, 2018, through cash tender offers, Southern Company repurchased and retired approximately $522 million of the Merger, $1.0 billion aggregate principal amount outstanding of its 1.85% Senior Notes due July 1, 2019 (1.85% Notes), approximately $180 million of the $350 million aggregate principal amount outstanding of its Series 2014B 2.15% Senior Notes due September 1, 2019 (Series 2014B Notes), and approximately $504 million of the $750 million aggregate principal amount outstanding of its Series 2018A Floating Rate Notes due February 14, 2020 (Series 2018A Notes), for an aggregate purchase price, excluding accrued and unpaid interest, of approximately $1.2 billion. In addition, subsequent to December 31, 2018, and following the completion of the cash tender offers, Southern Company completed the redemption of all of the Series 2018A Notes remaining outstanding and called for redemption all of the 1.85% Notes and Series 2014B Notes remaining outstanding.
In June 2018, Alabama Power issued $500 million aggregate principal amount of Series 2018A 4.30% Senior Notes due July 15, 2048.
In April 2018, Georgia Power redeemed all $250 million aggregate principal amount of its Series 2008B 5.40% Senior Notes due June 1, 2018.
In May 2018, through cash tender offers, Georgia Power repurchased and retired $89 million of the $250 million aggregate principal amount outstanding of its Series 2007A 5.65% Senior Notes due March 1, 2037, $326 million of the $500 million aggregate principal amount outstanding of its Series 2009A 5.95% Senior Notes due February 1, 2039, and $335 million of the $600 million aggregate principal amount outstanding of its Series 2010B 5.40% Senior Notes due June 1, 2040, for an aggregate purchase price, excluding accrued and unpaid interest, of $902 million.
In March 2018, Mississippi Power issued $300 million aggregate principal amount of Series 2018A Floating Rate Senior Notes due March 27, 2020 bearing interest based on three-month LIBOR and $300 million aggregate principal amount of Series 2018B 3.95% Senior Notes due March 30, 2028.
In October 2018, Mississippi Power completed the redemption of all $30 million aggregate principal amount outstanding of its Series G 5.40% Senior Notes due July 1, 2035 and all $125 million aggregate principal amount outstanding of its Series 2009A 5.55% Senior Notes due March 1, 2019.

COMBINED NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)
Southern Company and Subsidiary Companies 2018 Annual Report

Junior Subordinated Notes
Total junior subordinated notes outstanding for Southern Company and Georgia Power at December 31, 2018 and 2017 were as follows:
 
Southern
Company
(*)
Georgia
Power
 (in millions)
December 31, 2018$3,570
$270
December 31, 20173,570
270
(*)Includes $3.3 billion of junior subordinated notes at the Southern Company parent entity at both December 31, 2018 and 2017.
Pollution Control Revenue Bonds
Pollution control revenue bond obligations represent loans to the traditional electric operating companies from public authorities of funds derived from sales by such authorities of revenue bonds issued to finance pollution control and solid waste disposal facilities. In some cases, the pollution control revenue bond obligations represent obligations under installment sales agreements with respect to facilities constructed with the proceeds of revenue bonds issued by public authorities. The traditional electric operating companies are required to make payments sufficient for the authorities to meet principal and interest requirements of such bonds. Proceeds from certain issuances are restricted until qualifying expenditures are incurred. Total tax-exempt pollution control revenue bond obligations (including amounts due within one year) outstanding at December 31, 2018 and 2017 were as follows:
 
Southern
Company
Alabama
Power
Georgia
Power
Mississippi Power
 (in millions)
December 31, 2018$2,585
$1,060
$1,460
$40
December 31, 20173,297
1,060
1,821
83
In October 2018, Alabama Power purchased and held $120 million aggregate principal amount of The Industrial Development Board of the City of Mobile, Alabama Pollution Control Revenue Bonds (Alabama Power Company Plant Barry Project), Series 2008. Alabama Power reoffered these bonds to the public in November 2018.
During 2018, Georgia Power purchased and held the following pollution control revenue bonds, which may be reoffered to the public at a later date:
approximately $105 million aggregate principal amount of Development Authority of Burke County (Georgia) Pollution Control Revenue Bonds (Georgia Power Company Plant Vogtle Project), First Series 2013
$173 million aggregate principal amount of Development Authority of Bartow County (Georgia) Pollution Control Revenue Bonds (Georgia Power Company Plant Bowen Project), First Series 2009
$55 million aggregate principal amount of Development Authority of Burke County (Georgia) Pollution Control Revenue Bonds (Georgia Power Company Plant Vogtle Project), Fifth Series 1994
$65 million aggregate principal amount of Development Authority of Burke County (Georgia) Pollution Control Revenue Bonds (Georgia Power Company Plant Vogtle Project), Second Series 2008
approximately $72 million aggregate principal amount of Development Authority of Bartow County (Georgia) Pollution Control Revenue Bonds (Georgia Power Company Plant Bowen Project), First Series 2013
In December 2018, the Development Authority of Burke County (Georgia) issued approximately $108 million aggregate principal amount of Pollution Control Revenue Bonds (Georgia Power Company Plant Vogtle Project), First Series 2018 due November 1, 2052 for the benefit of Georgia Power. The proceeds were used to redeem, in January 2019, approximately $13 million, $20 million, and $75 million aggregate principal amount of Development Authority of Burke County (Georgia) Pollution Control Revenue Bonds (Georgia Power Company Plant Vogtle Project), First Series 1992, Eighth Series 1994, and Second Series 1995, respectively.
In July 2018, Mississippi Power purchased and held approximately $43 million aggregate principal amount of Mississippi Business Finance Corporation Pollution Control Revenue Refunding Bonds, Series 2002. Mississippi Power may reoffer these bonds to the public at a later date.

COMBINED NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)
Southern Company and Subsidiary Companies 2018 Annual Report

Bank Term Loans
Total long-term bank term loans (including amounts due within one year) outstanding at December 31, 2018 and 2017 were as follows:
 
Southern
Company
Alabama PowerGeorgia
Power
Mississippi PowerSouthern Power
 (in millions)
December 31, 2018$145
$45
$
$
$
December 31, 20171,465
45
100
900
420
See "Notes Payable" herein for additional information regarding bank term loans.
In January 2018, Georgia Power repaid its outstanding $100 million floating rate bank loan due October 26, 2018.
In March 2018, Mississippi Power repaid at maturity a $900 million unsecured term loan.
In May 2018, Southern Power repaid $420 million aggregate principal amount of long-term floating rate bank loans.
In November 2018, SEGCO, as borrower, and Alabama Power, as guarantor, entered into a $100 million long-term delayed draw floating rate bank term loan bearing interest based on three-month LIBOR, which SEGCO used to repay at maturity $100 million aggregate principal amount of Series 2013A Senior Notes. See Note 9 under "Guarantees" for additional information.
DOE Loan Guarantee Borrowings
Pursuant to the loan guarantee program established under Title XVII of the Energy Policy Act of 2005 (Title XVII Loan Guarantee Program), Georgia Power and the DOE entered into the Loan Guarantee Agreement in 2014, under which the DOE agreed to guarantee the obligations of Georgia Power under a note purchase agreement (FFB Note Purchase Agreement) among the DOE, Georgia Power, and the FFB and a related promissory note (FFB Promissory Note). The FFB Note Purchase Agreement and the FFB Promissory Note provide for a multi-advance term loan facility (FFB Credit Facility), under which Georgia Power may make term loan borrowings through the FFB.
In July 2017, Georgia Power entered into an amendment to the Loan Guarantee Agreement (LGA Amendment) in connection with the DOE's consent to Georgia Power's entry into the Vogtle Services Agreement and the related intellectual property licenses (IP Licenses).
Under the terms of the Loan Guarantee Agreement, upon termination of the Vogtle 3 and 4 Agreement, further advances are conditioned upon the DOE's approval of any agreements entered into in replacement of the Vogtle 3 and 4 Agreement. Under the terms of the LGA Amendment, Georgia Power will not request any advances unless and until certain conditions are satisfied, including (i) receipt of the DOE's approval of the Bechtel Agreement (together with the Vogtle Services Agreement and the IP Licenses, the Replacement EPC Arrangements) and (ii) Georgia Power's entry into a further amendment to the Loan Guarantee Agreement with the DOE to reflect the Replacement EPC Arrangements.
Proceeds of advances made under the FFB Credit Facility are used to reimburse Georgia Power for Eligible Project Costs. Aggregate borrowings under the FFB Credit Facility may not exceed the lesser of (i) 70% of Eligible Project Costs or (ii) approximately $3.46 billion.
In September 2017, the DOE issued a conditional commitment to Georgia Power for up to approximately $1.67 billion of additional guaranteed loans under the Loan Guarantee Agreement. This conditional commitment expires on March 31, 2019, subject to any further extension approved by the DOE. Final approval and issuance of these additional loan guarantees by the DOE cannot be assured and are subject to the negotiation of definitive agreements, completion of due diligence by the DOE, receipt of any necessary regulatory approvals, and satisfaction of other conditions.
All borrowings under the FFB Credit Facility are full recourse to Georgia Power, and Georgia Power is obligated to reimburse the DOE for any payments the DOE is required to make to the FFB under the guarantee. Georgia Power's reimbursement obligations to the DOE are full recourse and secured by a first priority lien on (i) Georgia Power's 45.7% undivided ownership interest in Plant Vogtle Units 3 and 4 (primarily the units under construction, the related real property, and any nuclear fuel loaded in the reactor core) and (ii) Georgia Power's rights and obligations under the principal contracts relating to Plant Vogtle Units 3 and 4. There are no restrictions on Georgia Power's ability to grant liens on other property.
In addition to the conditions described above, future advances are subject to satisfaction of customary conditions, as well as certification of compliance with the requirements of the Title XVII Loan Guarantee Program, including accuracy of project-related representations and warranties, delivery of updated project-related information, and evidence of compliance with the

COMBINED NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)
Southern Company and Subsidiary Companies 2018 Annual Report

prevailing wage requirements of the Davis-Bacon Act of 1931, as amended, and certification from the DOE's consulting engineer that proceeds of the advances are used to reimburse Eligible Project Costs.
Upon satisfaction of all conditions described above, advances may be requested under the FFB Credit Facility on a quarterly basis through 2020. The final maturity date for each advance under the FFB Credit Facility is February 20, 2044. Interest is payable quarterly and principal payments will begin on February 20, 2020. Borrowings under the FFB Credit Facility will bear interest at the applicable U.S. Treasury rate plus a spread equal to 0.375%.
At both December 31, 2018 and 2017, Georgia Power had $2.6 billion of borrowings outstanding under the FFB Credit Facility.
Under the Loan Guarantee Agreement, Georgia Power is subject to customary borrower affirmative and negative covenants and events of default. In addition, Georgia Power is subject to project-related reporting requirements and other project-specific covenants and events of default.
In the event certain mandatory prepayment events (including any decision not to continue construction of Plant Vogtle Units 3 and 4) occur, the FFB's commitment to make further advances under the FFB Credit Facility will terminate and Georgia Power will be required to prepay the outstanding principal amount of all borrowings under the FFB Credit Facility over a period of five years (with level principal amortization). Among other things, these mandatory prepayment events include (i) the termination of the Vogtle Services Agreement or rejection of the Vogtle Services Agreement in bankruptcy if Georgia Power does not maintain access to intellectual property rights under the IP Licenses; (ii) a decision by Georgia Power not to continue construction of Plant Vogtle Units 3 and 4; (iii) cancellation of Plant Vogtle Units 3 and 4 by the Georgia PSC, or by Georgia Power if authorized by the Georgia PSC; and (iv) cost disallowances by the Georgia PSC that could have a material adverse effect on completion of Plant Vogtle Units 3 and 4 or Georgia Power's ability to repay the outstanding borrowings under the FFB Credit Facility. Under certain circumstances, insurance proceeds and any proceeds from an event of taking must be applied to immediately prepay outstanding borrowings under the FFB Credit Facility. In addition, if Georgia Power discontinues construction of Plant Vogtle Units 3 and 4, Georgia Power would be obligated to immediately repay a portion of the outstanding borrowings under the FFB Credit Facility to the extent such outstanding borrowings exceed 70% of Eligible Project Costs, net of the proceeds received by Georgia Power under the Guarantee Settlement Agreement. Georgia Power also may voluntarily prepay outstanding borrowings under the FFB Credit Facility. Under the FFB Credit Facility, any prepayment (whether mandatory or optional) will be made with a make-whole premium or discount, as applicable.
In connection with any cancellation of Plant Vogtle Units 3 and 4 that results in a mandatory prepayment event, the DOE may elect to continue construction of Plant Vogtle Units 3 and 4. In such an event, the DOE will have the right to assume Georgia Power's rights and obligations under the principal agreements relating to Plant Vogtle Units 3 and 4 and to acquire all or a portion of Georgia Power's ownership interest in Plant Vogtle Units 3 and 4.
Other Long-Term Debt
Alabama Power
Alabama Power has formed a wholly-owned trust subsidiary for the purpose of issuing preferred securities. The proceeds of the related equity investments and preferred security sales were loaned back to Alabama Power through the issuance of junior subordinated notes totaling $206 million outstanding at December 31, 2018 and 2017, which constitute substantially all of the assets of this trust and are reflected in the balance sheets as long-term debt payable. Alabama Power considers that the mechanisms and obligations relating to the preferred securities issued for its benefit, taken together, constitute a full and unconditional guarantee by it of the trust's payment obligations with respect to these securities. At December 31, 2018 and 2017, trust preferred securities of $200 million were outstanding. See Note 1 under "Variable Interest Entities" for additional information on the accounting treatment for this trust and the related securities.
Mississippi Power
At December 31, 2018 and 2017, Mississippi Power had $270 million aggregate principal amount outstanding of Mississippi Business Finance Corporation Taxable Revenue Bonds, 7.13% Series 1999A due October 20, 2021. Mississippi Power assumed the obligations in 2011 in connection with its election under its operating lease of Plant Daniel Units 3 and 4 to purchase the assets. The bonds were recorded at fair value at the date of assumption, or $346 million, reflecting a premium of $76 million. See "Secured Debt" herein for additional information.
At December 31, 2018 and 2017, Mississippi Power had $50 million of tax-exempt revenue bond obligations outstanding representing loans to Mississippi Power from a public authority of funds derived from the sale by such authority of revenue bonds issued to finance a portion of the costs of constructing the Kemper County energy facility.

COMBINED NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)
Southern Company and Subsidiary Companies 2018 Annual Report

Southern Company Gas
At December 31, 2018 and 2017, Nicor Gas had $1.3 billion and $1.0 billion, respectively, of first mortgage bonds outstanding. These bonds have been issued with maturities ranging from 2019 to 2058. See "Secured Debt" herein for additional information.
Prior to its sale, in the second quarter 2018, Pivotal Utility Holdings caused $200 million aggregate principal amount of gas facility revenue bonds to be redeemed.
Nicor Gas issued $300 million aggregate principal amount of first mortgage bonds in a private placement, of which $100 million was issued in August 2018 and $200 million was issued in November 2018.
At both December 31, 2018 and 2017, Atlanta Gas Light had $159 million of medium-term notes outstanding.
Capital Leases
Assets acquired under capital leases are recorded in the balance sheets as property, plant, and equipment and the related obligations are classified as long-term debt. See Note 5 under "Capital Leases" for additional information.
Southern Company
At December 31, 2018 and 2017, SCS had capital lease obligations of approximately $178 million and $177 million, respectively, for an office building and certain computer equipment including desktops, laptops, servers, printers, and storage devices with annual interest rates that range from 1.6% to 4.7%.
Georgia Power
At December 31, 2018 and 2017, Georgia Power had a capital lease obligation for its corporate headquarters building of $15 million and $22 million, respectively, with an annual interest rate of 7.9%. For ratemaking purposes, the Georgia PSC has allowed the lease payments in cost of service with no return on the capital lease asset. The difference between the depreciation and the lease payments allowed for ratemaking purposes is recovered as operating expenses as ordered by the Georgia PSC. The annual operating expense incurred for this capital lease was not material for any year presented.
At December 31, 2018 and 2017, Georgia Power had capital lease obligations related to two affiliate PPAs with Southern Power of $128 million and $132 million, respectively. The annual interest rates range from 11% to 12% for these two capital lease PPAs. For ratemaking purposes, the Georgia PSC has included the capital lease asset amortization in cost of service and the interest in Georgia Power's cost of debt. See Note 1 under "Affiliate Transactions" and Note 9 under "Fuel and Power Purchase AgreementsAffiliate" for additional information.
Secured Debt
Each of Southern Company's subsidiaries is organized as a legal entity, separate and apart from Southern Company and its other subsidiaries. There are no agreements or other arrangements among the Southern Company system companies under which the assets of one company have been pledged or otherwise made available to satisfy obligations of Southern Company or any of its other subsidiaries.
Outstanding secured debt at December 31, 2018 and 2017 for the applicable registrants was as follows:
 
Georgia
Power
(a)
Mississippi
 Power(b)
Southern
Company
 Gas(c)
 (in millions)
December 31, 2018$2,767
$270
$1,325
December 31, 20172,779
270
1,025
(a)
Includes Georgia Power's FFB loans that are secured by a first priority lien on (i) Georgia Power's 45.7% undivided ownership interest in Plant Vogtle Units 3 and 4 (primarily the units under construction, the related real property, and any nuclear fuel loaded in the reactor core) and (ii) Georgia Power's rights and obligations under the principal contracts relating to Plant Vogtle Units 3 and 4. These borrowings totaled $2.6 billion at both December 31, 2018 and 2017. See "Long-term DebtDOE Loan Guarantee Borrowings" herein for additional information. Also includes capital lease obligations of $142 million and $154 million at December 31, 2018 and 2017, respectively. See "Long-term DebtCapital LeasesGeorgia Power" herein for additional information.
(b)
The revenue bonds assumed in conjunction with Mississippi Power's purchase of Plant Daniel Units 3 and 4 are secured by Plant Daniel Units 3 and 4 and certain related personal property. See "Long-term DebtOther Long-Term Debt" herein for additional information.
(c)
Nicor Gas' first mortgage bonds are secured by substantially all of Nicor Gas' properties. See "Long-term DebtOther Long-Term DebtSouthern Company Gas" herein for additional information.

COMBINED NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)
Southern Company and Subsidiary Companies 2018 Annual Report

At December 31, 2018 and 2017, Gulf Power had $41 million of secured debt related to a lien on its property at Plant Daniel in connection with the issuance of two series of its pollution control revenue bonds, which are included in liabilities held for sale on Southern Company's balance sheet at December 31, 2018. On January 1, 2019, Southern Company completed its sale of Gulf Power to NextEra Energy. See Note 15 under "Southern Company's Sale of Gulf Power" for additional information.
Each registrant's senior notes, junior subordinated notes, pollution control and other revenue bond obligations, bank term loans, credit facility borrowings, and notes payable are effectively subordinated to all secured debt of each respective registrant.
Bank Credit Arrangements
At December 31, 2018, committed credit arrangements with banks were as follows:
 Expires   Executable Term Loans 
Expires Within
One Year
Company2019 2020 2022 Total 
Unused(d)
 
One
Year
 
Two
Years
 Term Out No Term Out
 (in millions)
Southern Company(a)
$
 $
 $2,000
 $2,000
 $1,999
 $
 $
 $
 $
Alabama Power33
 500
 800
 1,333
 1,333
 
 
 
 33
Georgia Power
 
 1,750
 1,750
 1,736
 
 
 
 
Mississippi Power100
 
 
 100
 100
 
 
 
 100
Southern Power(b)

 
 750
 750
 727
 
 
 
 
Southern Company Gas(c)

 
 1,900
 1,900
 1,895
 
 
 
 
Other30
 
 
 30
 30
 
 
 
 30
Southern Company Consolidated(e)
$163
 $500
 $7,200
 $7,863
 $7,820
 $
 $
 $
 $163
(a)Represents the Southern Company parent entity.
(b)Southern Power's subsidiaries are not parties to its bank credit arrangement.
(c)
Southern Company Gas provides a parent guarantee of the obligations of its subsidiary Southern Company Gas Capital, which is the borrower of $1.4 billion ($1.395 billion unused) of this arrangement. Southern Company Gas' committed credit arrangement also includes $500 million (all unused) for which Nicor Gas is the borrower and which is restricted for working capital needs of Nicor Gas. Pursuant to this multi-year credit arrangement, the allocations between Southern Company Gas Capital and Nicor Gas may be adjusted. See "Structural Considerations" herein for additional information.
(d)Amounts used are for letters of credit.
(e)
Excludes $280 million of committed credit arrangements of Gulf Power, which was sold on January 1, 2019. See Note 15 under "Southern Company's Sale of Gulf Power" for additional information.
Most of the bank credit arrangements require payment of commitment fees based on the unused portion of the commitments or the maintenance of compensating balances with the banks. Commitment fees average less than 1/4 of 1% for Southern Company, the traditional electric operating companies, Southern Power, Southern Company Gas, and Nicor Gas. Compensating balances are not legally restricted from withdrawal.
Subject to applicable market conditions, Southern Company and its subsidiaries expect to renew or replace their bank credit arrangements as needed, prior to expiration. In connection therewith, Southern Company and its subsidiaries may extend the maturity dates and/or increase or decrease the lending commitments thereunder.
Southern Company's, Southern Company Gas', and Nicor Gas' credit arrangements contain covenants that limit debt levels to 70% of total capitalization, as defined in the agreements, and most of the other subsidiaries' bank credit arrangements contain covenants that limit debt levels to 65% of total capitalization, as defined in the agreements. For purposes of these definitions, debt excludes the long-term debt payable to affiliated trusts and, in certain arrangements, other hybrid securities. Additionally, for Southern Company and Southern Power, for purposes of these definitions, debt would exclude any project debt incurred by certain subsidiaries of Southern Power to the extent such debt is non-recourse to Southern Power and capitalization would exclude the capital stock or other equity attributable to such subsidiaries. At December 31, 2018, Southern Company, the traditional electric operating companies, Southern Power, Southern Company Gas, and Nicor Gas were each in compliance with their respective debt limit covenants.
A portion of the unused credit with banks is allocated to provide liquidity support to the revenue bonds of the traditional electric operating companies and the commercial paper programs of Southern Company, the traditional electric operating companies, Southern Power, Southern Company Gas, and Nicor Gas. The amount of variable rate revenue bonds of the traditional electric

COMBINED NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)
Southern Company and Subsidiary Companies 2018 Annual Report

operating companies outstanding requiring liquidity support at December 31, 2018 was approximately $1.6 billion (comprised of approximately $854 million at Alabama Power, $659 million at Georgia Power, $82 million at Gulf Power, and $40 million at Mississippi Power). In addition, at December 31, 2018, the traditional electric operating companies had approximately $403 million (comprised of approximately $345 million at Georgia Power and $58 million at Gulf Power) of revenue bonds outstanding that are required to be remarketed within the next 12 months. See Note 15 under "Southern Company's Sale of Gulf Power" for information regarding the sale of Gulf Power on January 1, 2019. Subsequent to December 31, 2018, Georgia Power redeemed approximately $108 million of obligations related to outstanding variable rate pollution control revenue bonds.
In addition to its credit arrangement described above, Southern Power also has a $120 million continuing letter of credit facility expiring in 2021 for standby letters of credit. At December 31, 2018, $103 million has been used for letters of credit, primarily as credit support for PPA requirements, and $17 million was unused. At December 31, 2017, the total amount available under this facility was $19 million. Southern Power's subsidiaries are not parties to this letter of credit facility. Also, at December 31, 2018 and 2017, Southern Power had $103 million and $113 million, respectively, of cash collateral posted related to PPA requirements, which is included in other deferred charges and assets in Southern Power's consolidated balance sheets.
Notes Payable
Southern Company, Alabama Power, Georgia Power, Southern Power, Southern Company Gas, Nicor Gas, and SEGCO make short-term borrowings primarily through commercial paper programs that have the liquidity support of the committed bank credit arrangements described above under "Bank Credit Arrangements." Southern Power's subsidiaries are not parties to its commercial paper program. Southern Company Gas maintains commercial paper programs at Southern Company Gas Capital and at Nicor Gas. Nicor Gas' commercial paper program supports working capital needs at Nicor Gas as Nicor Gas is not permitted to make money pool loans to affiliates. All of Southern Company Gas' other subsidiaries benefit from Southern Company Gas Capital's commercial paper program. See "Structural Considerations" herein for additional information.
In addition, Southern Company and certain of its subsidiaries have entered into various bank term loan agreements. Unless otherwise stated, the proceeds of these loans were used to repay existing indebtedness and for general corporate purposes, including working capital and, for the subsidiaries, their continuous construction programs.

COMBINED NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)
Southern Company and Subsidiary Companies 2018 Annual Report

Commercial paper and short-term bank term loans are included in notes payable in the balance sheets. Details of short-term borrowings were as follows:
 Notes Payable at December 31, 2018 Notes Payable at December 31, 2017
 
Amount
Outstanding
 
Weighted Average
Interest Rate
 
Amount
Outstanding
 
Weighted Average
Interest Rate
 (in millions)   (in millions)  
Southern Company       
Commercial paper$1,064
 3.0% $1,832
 1.8%
Short-term bank debt1,851
 3.1% 607
 2.3%
Total$2,915
 3.1% $2,439
 1.9%
        
Alabama Power       
Short-term bank debt$
 % $3
 3.7%
        
Georgia Power       
Commercial paper$294
 3.1% $
 %
Short-term bank debt
 % 150
 2.2%
Total$294
 3.1% $150
 2.2%
        
Mississippi Power       
Short-term bank debt$
 % $4
 3.8%
        
Southern Power       
Commercial paper$
 % $105
 2.0%
Short-term bank debt100
 3.1% 
 %
Total$100
 3.1% $105
 2.0%
        
Southern Company Gas       
Commercial paper:       
Southern Company Gas Capital$403
 3.1% $1,243
 1.7%
Nicor Gas247
 3.0% 275
 1.8%
Total$650
 3.0% $1,518
 1.8%
The outstanding bank term loans at December 31, 2018 have covenants that limit debt levels to a percentage of total capitalization. The percentage is 70% for Southern Company and 65% for Alabama Power and Southern Power, as defined in the agreements. For purposes of these definitions, debt excludes any long-term debt payable to affiliated trusts and other hybrid securities. Additionally, for Southern Company and Southern Power, for purposes of these definitions, debt excludes any project debt incurred by certain subsidiaries of Southern Power to the extent such debt is non-recourse to Southern Power and capitalization excludes the capital stock or other equity attributable to such subsidiary. At December 31, 2018, each of Southern Company, Alabama Power, and Southern Power was in compliance with its debt limits.
Except as otherwise described herein, Southern Company and its subsidiaries used the proceeds of bank loans for long-term debt redemptions and maturities, to repay short-term indebtedness, and for general corporate purposes, including working capital.
In March 2018, Southern Company entered into a $900 million short-term floating rate bank loan bearing interest based on one-month LIBOR, which was repaid in August 2018.
In April 2018, Southern Company borrowed $250 million pursuant to a short-term uncommitted bank credit arrangement, bearing interest at a rate agreed upon by Southern Company and the bank from time to time and payable on no less than 30 days' demand by the bank. Subsequent to December 31, 2018, Southern Company repaid this loan.
In June 2018, Southern Company repaid at maturity two $100 million short-term floating rate bank term loans.

COMBINED NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)
Southern Company and Subsidiary Companies 2018 Annual Report

In August 2018, Southern Company entered into a $1.5 billion short-term floating rate bank loan bearing interest based on one-month LIBOR, and repaid $250 million borrowed in August 2017 pursuant to a short-term uncommitted bank credit arrangement. Subsequent to December 31, 2018, Southern Company repaid this loan.
In January 2018, Georgia Power repaid its outstanding $150 million floating rate bank loan due May 31, 2018.
In March 2018, Mississippi Power entered into a $300 million short-term floating rate bank loan bearing interest based on one-month LIBOR, of which $200 million was repaid in the second quarter 2018 and $100 million was repaid in the third quarter 2018.
In May 2018, Southern Power entered into two short-term floating rate bank loans, each for an aggregate principal amount of $100 million, which bear interest based on one-month LIBOR. In November 2018, Southern Power repaid one of these short-term loans.
In January 2018, Southern Company Gas issued a floating rate promissory note to Southern Company in an aggregate principal amount of $100 million bearing interest based on one-month LIBOR. In March 2018, Southern Company Gas repaid this promissory note.
In April 2018, Pivotal Utility Holdings, as borrower, and Southern Company Gas, as guarantor, entered into a $181 million short-term delayed draw floating rate bank term loan bearing interest based on one-month LIBOR. In July 2018, Pivotal Utility Holdings repaid this short-term loan.
In May 2018, Southern Company Gas Capital borrowed $95 million pursuant to a short-term uncommitted bank credit arrangement, guaranteed by Southern Company Gas, bearing interest at a rate agreed upon by Southern Company Gas Capital and the bank from time to time and payable on no less than 30 days' demand by the bank. In July 2018, Southern Company Gas Capital repaid this loan.
Outstanding Classes of Capital Stock
Southern Company
Common Stock
Stock Issued
During 2018, Southern Company issued approximately 11.6 million shares of common stock primarily through employee equity compensation plans and received proceeds of approximately $442 million.
In addition, during the third and fourth quarters 2018, Southern Company issued a total of approximately 12.1 million and 2.5 million shares, respectively, of common stock through at-the-market issuances pursuant to sales agency agreements related to Southern Company's continuous equity offering program and received cash proceeds of approximately $540 million and $108 million, respectively, net of $5 million and $1 million in commissions, respectively.
Shares Reserved
At December 31, 2018, a total of 92 million shares were reserved for issuance pursuant to the Southern Investment Plan, employee savings plans, the Outside Directors Stock Plan, the Omnibus Incentive Compensation Plan (which includes stock options and performance share units as discussed in Note 12), and an at-the-market program. Of the total 92 million shares reserved, there were 10 million shares of common stock remaining available for awards under the Omnibus Incentive Compensation Plan at December 31, 2018.

COMBINED NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)
Southern Company and Subsidiary Companies 2018 Annual Report

Diluted Earnings Per Share
For Southern Company, the only difference in computing basic and diluted earnings per share (EPS) is attributable to awards outstanding under the stock option and performance share plans. The effect of both stock options and performance share award units was determined using the treasury stock method. Shares used to compute diluted EPS were as follows:
 Average Common Stock Shares
 2018 2017 2016
 (in millions)
As reported shares1,020
 1,000
 951
Effect of options and performance share award units5
 8
 7
Diluted shares1,025
 1,008
 958
Stock options and performance share award units that were not included in the diluted EPS calculation because they were anti-dilutive were immaterial in all years presented.
Redeemable Preferred Stock of Subsidiaries
Prior to 2017, each of the traditional electric operating companies had outstanding preferred and/or preference stock. During 2017, Alabama Power and Gulf Power redeemed all of their outstanding preference stock and Georgia Power redeemed all of its outstanding preferred and preference stock. During 2018, Mississippi Power redeemed all of its outstanding preferred stock. The remaining preferred stock of Alabama Power contains a feature that allows the holders to elect a majority of such subsidiary's board of directors if preferred dividends are not paid for four consecutive quarters. Because such a potential redemption-triggering event is not solely within the control of Alabama Power, this preferred stock is presented as "Redeemable Preferred Stock of Subsidiaries" on Southern Company's balance sheets and statements of capitalization in a manner consistent with temporary equity under applicable accounting standards.
The following table presents changes during the year in redeemable preferred stock of subsidiaries for Southern Company:
 Redeemable Preferred Stock of Subsidiaries
 (in millions)
Balance at December 31, 2015 and 2016:$118
Issued(a)
250
Redeemed(a)
(38)
Issuance costs(a)
(6)
Balance at December 31, 2017:324
Redeemed(b)
(33)
Balance at December 31, 2018:$291
(a)
See "Alabama Power" herein for additional information.
(b)
See "Mississippi Power" herein for additional information.
Alabama Power
Alabama Power has preferred stock, Class A preferred stock, and common stock outstanding. Alabama Power also has authorized preference stock, none of which is outstanding. Alabama Power's preferred stock and Class A preferred stock, without preference between classes, rank senior to Alabama Power's common stock with respect to payment of dividends and voluntary and involuntary dissolution. The preferred stock and Class A preferred stock of Alabama Power contain a feature that allows the holders to elect a majority of Alabama Power's board of directors if preferred dividends are not paid for four consecutive quarters. Because such a potential redemption-triggering event is not solely within the control of Alabama Power, the preferred stock and Class A preferred stock is presented as "Redeemable Preferred Stock" on Alabama Power's balance sheets and statements of capitalization in a manner consistent with temporary equity under applicable accounting standards.
Alabama Power's preferred stock is subject to redemption at a price equal to the par value plus a premium. Alabama Power's Class A preferred stock is subject to redemption at a price equal to the stated capital. All series of Alabama Power's preferred stock currently are subject to redemption at the option of Alabama Power. The Class A preferred stock is subject to redemption on or

COMBINED NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)
Southern Company and Subsidiary Companies 2018 Annual Report

after October 1, 2022, or following the occurrence of a rating agency event. Information for each outstanding series is in the table below:
Preferred StockPar Value/Stated Capital Per Share Shares Outstanding 
Redemption
Price Per Share
4.92% Preferred Stock$100 80,000
 $103.23
4.72% Preferred Stock$100 50,000
 $102.18
4.64% Preferred Stock$100 60,000
 $103.14
4.60% Preferred Stock$100 100,000
 $104.20
4.52% Preferred Stock$100 50,000
 $102.93
4.20% Preferred Stock$100 135,115
 $105.00
5.00% Class A Preferred Stock$25 10,000,000
 
Stated Capital(*)
(*)Prior to October 1, 2022: $25.50; on or after October 1, 2022: Stated Capital
In September 2017, Alabama Power issued 10 million shares ($250 million aggregate stated capital) of 5.00% Class A Preferred Stock, Cumulative, Par Value $1 Per Share (Stated Capital $25 Per Share). The proceeds were used in October 2017 to redeem all 2 million shares ($50 million aggregate stated capital) of 6.50% Series Preference Stock, 6 million shares ($150 million aggregate stated capital) of 6.45% Series Preference Stock, and 1.52 million shares ($38 million aggregate stated capital) of 5.83% Class A Preferred Stock and for other general corporate purposes, including Alabama Power's continuous construction program.
There were no changes for the year ended December 31, 2018 in redeemable preferred stock of Alabama Power.
Georgia Power
Georgia Power has preferred stock, Class A preferred stock, preference stock, and common stock authorized, but only common stock outstanding as of December 31, 2018 and 2017. In October 2017, Georgia Power redeemed all 1.8 million shares ($45 million aggregate liquidation amount) of its 6.125% Series Class A Preferred Stock and 2.25 millionshares ($225 millionaggregate liquidation amount) of its 6.50% Series 2007A Preference Stock.
Mississippi Power
Mississippi Power has preferred stock and common stock authorized, but only common stock outstanding as of December 31, 2018. Mississippi Power previously had preferred stock that contained a feature allowing the holders to elect a majority of Mississippi Power's board of directors if preferred dividends were not paid for four consecutive quarters. Because such a potential redemption-triggering event was not solely within the control of Mississippi Power, this preferred stock was presented as "Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Stock" on Mississippi Power's balance sheets and statements of capitalization in a manner consistent with temporary equity under applicable accounting standards.
On October 23, 2018, Mississippi Power completed the redemption of all 8,867 outstanding shares ($886,700 aggregate par value) of its 4.40% Series Preferred Stock, all 8,643 outstanding shares ($864,300 aggregate par value) of its 4.60% Series Preferred Stock, all 16,700 outstanding shares ($1.67 million aggregate par value) of its 4.72% Series Preferred Stock, and all 1,200,000 outstanding depositary shares ($30 million aggregate stated value), each representing a 1/4th interest in a share of its 5.25% Series Preferred Stock.
Dividend Restrictions
The income of Southern Company is derived primarily from equity in earnings of its subsidiaries. At December 31, 2018, consolidated retained earnings included $4.9 billion of undistributed retained earnings of the subsidiaries.
The traditional electric operating companies and Southern Power can only pay dividends to Southern Company out of retained earnings or paid-in-capital.
See Note 7 under "Southern Power" for information regarding the distribution requirements for certain Southern Power subsidiaries.
The authority of the natural gas distribution utilities to pay dividends to Southern Company Gas is subject to regulation. By regulation, Nicor Gas is restricted, to the extent of its retained earnings balance, in the amount it can dividend or loan to affiliates and is not permitted to make money pool loans to affiliates. At December 31, 2018, the amount of Southern Company Gas' subsidiary retained earnings restricted for dividend payment totaled $814 million.

COMBINED NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)
Southern Company and Subsidiary Companies 2018 Annual Report

Structural Considerations
Since Southern Company and Southern Company Gas are holding companies, the right of Southern Company and Southern Company Gas and, hence, the right of creditors of Southern Company or Southern Company Gas to participate in any distribution of the assets of any respective subsidiary of Southern Company or Southern Company Gas, whether upon liquidation, reorganization or otherwise, is subject to prior claims of creditors and preferred stockholders of such subsidiary.
Southern Company Gas' 100%-owned subsidiary, Southern Company Gas Capital, was established to provide for certain of Southern Company Gas' ongoing financing needs through a commercial paper program, the issuance of various debt, hybrid securities, and other financing arrangements. Southern Company Gas fully and unconditionally guarantees all debt issued by Southern Company Gas Capital. Nicor Gas is not permitted by regulation to make loans to affiliates or utilize Southern Company Gas Capital for its financing needs.
Southern Power Company's senior notes, bank term loans, commercial paper, and bank credit arrangementare unsecured senior indebtedness, which rank equally with all other unsecured and unsubordinated debt of Southern Power Company. Southern Power's subsidiaries are not issuers, borrowers, or obligors, as applicable, under the senior notes, borrowings from financial institutions, commercial paper, or the bank credit arrangement. The senior notes, borrowings from financial institutions, commercial paper, and the bank credit arrangement are effectively subordinated to any future secured debt of Southern Power Company and any potential claims of creditors of Southern Power's subsidiaries.

COMBINED NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)
Southern Company and Subsidiary Companies 2018 Annual Report

9. COMMITMENTS
Fuel and Power Purchase Agreements
Non-Affiliate
To supply a portion of the fuel requirements of the Southern Company system's electric generating plants, the Southern Company system has entered into various long-term commitments not recognized on the balance sheets for the procurement and delivery of fossil fuel and, for Alabama Power and Georgia Power, nuclear fuel. Fuel expense in 2018, 2017, and 2016 for the Southern Company system is shown below, the majority of which was purchased under long-term commitments.
 Southern Company
Alabama
Power
Georgia
Power
Mississippi Power
Southern
Power
 (in millions)
2018$4,637
$1,301
$1,698
$405
$699
20174,400
1,225
1,671
395
621
20164,361
1,297
1,807
343
456
Each registrant expects that a substantial amount of its future fuel needs will continue to be purchased under long-term commitments.
The traditional electric operating companies have entered into various non-affiliate long-term PPAs, some of which are accounted for as leases. For Alabama Power and Georgia Power, most long-term PPAs include capacity and energy components. Mississippi Power's long-term PPAs are associated with solar facilities and only include an energy component. For the traditional electric operating companies, the energy-related costs associated with PPAs are recoverable through fuel cost recovery provisions.
Total capacity expense under these non-affiliate PPAs accounted for as operating leases in 2018, 2017, and 2016 was as follows:
 Southern Company
Alabama
Power
Georgia
Power
 (in millions)
2018$231
$44
$113
2017235
41
118
2016232
42
113
In addition, Georgia Power's non-affiliate energy-only solar PPAs accounted for as leases contained contingent rent expense of $43 million, $44 million, and $18 million for 2018, 2017, and 2016, respectively. Mississippi Power's energy-only solar PPAs accounted for as operating leases contained contingent rent expense of $10 million, $5 million, and an immaterial amount for 2018, 2017, and 2016, respectively. Contingent rents are recognized as services are performed.
Estimated total obligations under non-affiliate PPAs accounted for as operating leases at December 31, 2018 were as follows:
 Southern CompanyAlabama Power
Georgia
Power
 (in millions)
2019$161
$41
$120
2020164
42
122
2021168
44
124
2022171
46
125
2023127

127
2024 and thereafter642

642
Total$1,433
$173
$1,260
In addition, Georgia Power has commitments regarding a portion of a 5% interest in the original cost of Plant Vogtle Units 1 and 2 owned by MEAG Power that are in effect until the latter of the retirement of the plant or the latest stated maturity date of MEAG Power's bonds issued to finance such ownership interest. The payments for capacity are required whether or not any capacity is

COMBINED NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)
Southern Company and Subsidiary Companies 2018 Annual Report

available. The energy cost is a function of each unit's variable operating costs. Portions of the capacity payments relate to costs in excess of MEAG Power's Plant Vogtle Units 1 and 2 allowed investment for ratemaking purposes. The present value of these portions at the time of the disallowance was written off. Generally, the cost of such capacity and energy is included in purchased power in Southern Company's statements of income and in purchased power, non-affiliates in Georgia Power's statements of income. Georgia Power's capacity payments related to this commitment totaled $8 million, $9 million, and $11 million in 2018, 2017, and 2016, respectively. At December 31, 2018, Georgia Power's estimated long-term obligations related to this commitment totaled $59 million, consisting of $6 million for 2019, $5 million for 2020, $5 million for 2021, $4 million for 2022, $3 million for 2023, and $36 million for 2024 and thereafter.
SCS may enter into various types of wholesale energy and natural gas contracts acting as an agent for the traditional electric operating companies and Southern Power. Under these agreements, each of the traditional electric operating companies and Southern Power may be jointly and severally liable. Accordingly, Southern Company has entered into keep-well agreements with each of the traditional electric operating companies to ensure they will not subsidize or be responsible for any costs, losses, liabilities, or damages resulting from the inclusion of Southern Power as a contracting party under these agreements.
Affiliate
Georgia Power has also entered into affiliate long-term PPAs with Southern Power, some of which Georgia Power accounts for as leases. Georgia Power's total capacity expense under these affiliate PPAs accounted for as leases was $93 million, $107 million, and $133 million in 2018, 2017, and 2016, respectively. In addition, Georgia Power's energy-only solar PPAs with Southern Power accounted for as leases contained contingent rent expense of $29 million, $29 million, and $21 million for 2018, 2017, and 2016, respectively.
Georgia Power's estimated total obligations under affiliate PPAs accounted for as leases at December 31, 2018 were as follows:
 Georgia Power
 Affiliate Capital Lease PPAs 
Affiliate Operating
Lease PPAs
 (in millions)
2019$23
 $64
202023
 65
202124
 66
202224
 68
202325
 69
2024 and thereafter158
 349
Total$277
 $681
Less: amounts representing executory costs(a)
42
  
Net minimum lease payments235
  
Less: amounts representing interest(b)
105
  
Present value of net minimum lease payments$130
  
(a)
Executory costs such as taxes, maintenance, and insurance (including the estimated profit thereon) are estimated and included in total minimum lease payments.
(b)Calculated using an adjusted incremental borrowing rate to reduce the present value of the net minimum lease payments to fair value.
See Note 8 under "Long-term DebtCapital LeasesGeorgia Power" for additional information.
Pipeline Charges, Storage Capacity, and Gas Supply
Southern Company Gas has commitments for pipeline charges, storage capacity, and gas supply, which include charges recoverable through natural gas cost recovery mechanisms, or alternatively, billed to marketers selling retail natural gas, as well as demand charges associated with Southern Company Gas' wholesale gas services. Gas supply commitments include amounts for gas commodity purchases associated with Southern Company Gas' gas marketing services of 47 million mmBtu at floating gas prices calculated using forward natural gas prices at December 31, 2018 and valued at $150 million. Southern Company Gas provides guarantees to certain gas suppliers for certain of its subsidiaries in support of payment obligations.

COMBINED NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)
Southern Company and Subsidiary Companies 2018 Annual Report

Southern Company Gas' expected future contractual obligations for pipeline charges, storage capacity, and gas supply that are not recognized on the balance sheets at December 31, 2018 were as follows:
 Pipeline Charges, Storage Capacity, and Gas Supply
 (in millions)
2019$781
2020584
2021520
2022489
2023412
2024 and thereafter1,871
Total$4,657
Operating Leases
In addition to the operating lease PPAs discussed previously, the Southern Company system has operating lease agreements with various terms and expiration dates. The traditional electric operating companies' operating leases primarily relate to facilities, coal railcars, vehicles, cellular tower space, and other equipment. Southern Power's operating leases primarily relate to land for solar and wind facilities and are recognized on a straight-line basis over the minimum lease term, plus any renewal periods necessary to cover the expected life of the respective facility. Southern Company Gas' operating leases primarily relate to facilities and vehicles.
Total rent expense for 2018, 2017, and 2016 was as follows:
 
Southern Company(*)
Alabama Power
Georgia
Power
Mississippi Power
Southern Power(*)
 (in millions)
2018$192
$23
$34
$4
$31
2017176
25
31
3
29
2016169
18
28
3
22
(*)Includes contingent rent expense related to Southern Power's land leases based on wind production and escalation in the Consumer Price Index for All Urban Consumers.
 Southern Company Gas
 (in millions)
2018$15
201715
Successor – July 1, 2016 through December 31, 20168
Predecessor – January 1, 2016 through June 30, 20166

COMBINED NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)
Southern Company and Subsidiary Companies 2018 Annual Report

The registrants exclude contingent rent but include any step rents, fixed escalations, lease concessions, and lease extensions to cover the expected life of the facility in the computation of minimum lease payments. At December 31, 2018, estimated minimum lease payments under operating leases were as follows:
 Southern CompanyAlabama Power
Georgia
Power
Mississippi PowerSouthern Power
Southern Company
Gas
 (in millions)
2019$156
$12
$23
$3
$23
$18
2020134
10
18
2
24
16
2021110
7
9
1
24
15
202298
6
6
1
24
13
202379
3
5
1
26
10
2024 and thereafter1,040
1
13
2
874
34
Total$1,617
$39
$74
$10
$995
$106
For the traditional electric operating companies, a majority of the railcar and barge lease expenses are recoverable through fuel cost recovery provisions.
In addition to the above rental commitments, Alabama Power and Georgia Power have potential obligations upon expiration of certain railcar leases with respect to the residual value of the leased property. These leases have terms expiring in 2023 for Alabama Power and in 2024 for Georgia Power with maximum obligations under these leases of $12 million for Alabama Power and $9 million for Georgia Power. At the termination of the leases, Alabama Power and Georgia Power may renew the leases, exercise their purchase options, or the property can be sold to a third party. Alabama Power and Georgia Power expect that the fair market value of the leased property would substantially reduce or, for Alabama Power, potentially eliminate the loss under the residual value obligations.
Guarantees
Alabama Power has guaranteed unconditionally the obligation of SEGCO under an installment sale agreement for the purchase of certain pollution control facilities at SEGCO's generating units, pursuant to which $25 million principal amount of pollution control revenue bonds are outstanding and mature in June 2019. Alabama Power also guaranteed a $100 million principal amount long-term bank loan entered into by SEGCO on November 28, 2018. Georgia Power has agreed to reimburse Alabama Power for the portion of such obligations corresponding to Georgia Power's proportionate ownership of SEGCO's stock if Alabama Power is called upon to make such payment under its guarantee. At December 31, 2018, the capitalization of SEGCO consisted of $90 million of equity and $125 million of long-term debt, on which the annual interest requirement is $4 million. In addition, SEGCO had short-term debt outstanding of $5 million. See Note 7 under "SEGCO" for additional information.
In 2013, Georgia Power entered into an agreement that requires Georgia Power to guarantee certain payments of a gas supplier for Plant McIntosh for a period up to 15 years. The agreement was subsequently amended on May 31, 2018. The guarantee is expected to be terminated if certain events occur by October 2019. In the event the gas supplier defaults on payments, the maximum potential exposure under the guarantee and amendment is approximately $30 million.
In October 2017, Atlantic Coast Pipeline executed a $3.4 billion revolving credit facility with a stated maturity date of October 2021. Southern Company Gas entered into a guarantee agreement to support its share of the revolving credit facility. Southern Company Gas' maximum exposure to loss under the terms of the guarantee is limited to 5% of the outstanding borrowings under the credit facility, and totaled $72 million as of December 31, 2018. See Note 2 under "FERC Matters – Southern Company Gas" for additional information regarding the Atlantic Coast Pipeline.
As discussed above under "Operating Leases," Alabama Power and Georgia Power have entered into certain residual value guarantees related to railcar leases.
10. INCOME TAXES
Southern Company files a consolidated federal income tax return and the registrants file various combined and separate state income tax returns, on behalfsome of the Company.which are combined or unitary. Under a joint consolidated income tax allocation agreement, each Southern Company subsidiary's current and deferred tax expense is computed on a stand-alone basis and no subsidiary is allocated more current expense than would be paid if it filed a separate income tax return. PowerSecure and Southern Company Gas became participants in the income

COMBINED NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)
Southern Company and Subsidiary Companies 2018 Annual Report

tax allocation agreement as of May 9, 2016 and July 1, 2016, respectively. See Note 15 for additional information on these acquisitions, as well as disposition activity during 2018. In accordance with IRS regulations, each company is jointly and severally liable for the federal tax liability. Prior to the Merger, theSouthern Company Gas filed a U.S. federal consolidated income tax return and various state income tax returns.
Federal Tax Reform Legislation
Following the enactment of the Tax Reform Legislation, the SEC staff issued Staff Accounting Bulletin 118 – "Income Tax Accounting Implications of the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act" (SAB 118), which providesprovided for a measurement period of up to one year from the enactment date to complete accounting under GAAP for the tax effects of the legislation. Due to the complex and comprehensive nature of the enacted tax law changes and their application under GAAP, the Company considersregistrants considered all amounts recorded in the financial statements as a result of the Tax Reform Legislation to be "provisional" as discussed in SAB 118 and subject to revision. The Company is awaiting additional guidancerevision prior to filing the 2017 tax return in the fourth quarter 2018. As of December 31, 2018, each of the registrants considered the measurement of impacts from industry and income tax authorities in order to finalize its accounting. The ultimate impact of the Tax Reform Legislation on deferred income tax assets and liabilities, primarily due to the impact of the reduction of the corporate income tax rate, to be complete.
However, the IRS continues to issue regulations that provide further interpretation and guidance on the relatedlaw and each respective state's adoption of the provisions contained in the Tax Reform Legislation remains uncertain. In addition, the regulatory assetstreatment of certain impacts of the Tax Reform Legislation is subject to the discretion of the FERC and liabilitieseach state regulatory commission. The ultimate impact of these matters cannot be determined at this time. See Note 2 for additional information.
Current and Deferred Income Taxes
Details of income tax provisions are as follows:
 Successor Predecessor
 Year ended December 31, 2017 July 1, 2016 through December 31, 2016  January 1, 2016 through June 30, 2016 Year ended December 31, 2015
 (in millions) (in millions)
Federal —        
Current$103
 $
  $67
 $(13)
Deferred170
 65
  8
 198
 273
 65
  75
 185
State —        
Current27
 (16)  12
 10
Deferred67
 27
  
 18
 94
 11
  12
 28
Total$367
 $76
  $87
 $213
Net cash payments (refunds) for income taxes for the successor periods of the year ended December 31, 2017 and July 1, 2016 through December 31, 2016 and the predecessor periods of January 1, 2016 through June 30, 2016 and the year ended December 31, 2015 were $72 million, $23 million, $(100) million, and $(26) million, respectively.
 2018
      
 Southern CompanyAlabama Power
Georgia
Power
Mississippi PowerSouthern Power
 (in millions)
Federal —     
Current$167
$91
$393
$(567)$85
Deferred231
123
(249)575
(154)
 398
214
144
8
(69)
State —  
  
Current188
26
81
(10)(9)
Deferred(137)51
(11)(100)(86)
 51
77
70
(110)(95)
Total$449
$291
$214
$(102)$(164)
    Table of Contents                                Index to Financial Statements

COMBINED NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)
Southern Company Gas and Subsidiary Companies 20172018 Annual Report


The tax effects of temporary differences between the carrying amounts of assets and liabilities in the financial statements and their respective tax bases, which give rise to deferred tax assets and liabilities, are as follows:
 2017
      
 Southern CompanyAlabama Power
Georgia
Power
Mississippi PowerSouthern Power
 (in millions)
Federal —     
Current$(62)$136
$256
$194
$(566)
Deferred(6)336
504
(753)(312)
 (68)472
760
(559)(878)
State —     
Current37
23
116

(110)
Deferred173
73
(46)27
49
 210
96
70
27
(61)
Total$142
$568
$830
$(532)$(939)
 2017 2016
 (in millions)
Deferred tax liabilities —   
Accelerated depreciation$1,436
 $1,954
Property basis differences204
 311
Regulatory assets associated with employee benefit obligations79
 125
Other208
 164
Total1,927
 2,554
Deferred tax assets —   
Federal net operating loss92
 59
Federal effect of state deferred taxes54
 42
Employee benefit obligations185
 165
Regulatory liability associated with the Tax Reform Legislation (not subject to
normalization)
295
 
Other223
 332
Total849
 598
Less valuation allowances(11) (19)
Total, net of valuation allowances838
 579
Accumulated deferred income taxes, net$1,089
 $1,975
 2016
 Southern CompanyAlabama Power
Georgia
Power
Mississippi PowerSouthern Power
 (in millions)
Federal —     
Current$1,184
$103
$391
$(31)$928
Deferred(342)339
319
(60)(1,098)
 842
442
710
(91)(170)
State —     
Current(108)20
6
(6)(60)
Deferred217
69
64
(7)35
 109
89
70
(13)(25)
Total$951
$531
$780
$(104)$(195)
The implementation of the Tax Reform Legislation significantly reduced accumulated deferred income taxes, partially offset by
bonus depreciation provisions
 Southern Company Gas
 Successor  Predecessor
 Year Ended December 31, 2018Year Ended December 31, 2017
July 1, 2016
through
December 31, 2016
  
January 1, 2016
through
June 30, 2016
 (in millions)  (in millions)
Federal —      
Current$334
$103
$
  $67
Deferred33
170
65
  8
 367
273
65
  75
State —      
Current131
27
(16)  12
Deferred(34)67
27
  
 97
94
11
  12
Total$464
$367
$76
  $87
Southern Company's and Southern Power's ITCs and PTCs generated in the Protecting Americanscurrent tax year and carried forward from Tax Hikes Act. The Tax Reform Legislation also significantly increased tax-related regulatory liabilities.
At December 31, 2017,prior tax years that cannot be utilized in the tax-related regulatory liabilities to be credited to customers were $1.1 billion. These liabilitiescurrent tax year are primarily attributablereclassified from current to deferred taxes previously recognized at rates higher thanin federal income tax expense in the current enacted tax lawtables above. Southern Power's ITCs and PTCs reclassified in this manner include $128 million for 2018, $316 million for

COMBINED NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)
Southern Company and Subsidiary Companies 2018 Annual Report

2017, and $1.13 billion for 2016. These ITCs and PTCs for Southern Company and Southern Power are included in "Deferred Tax Assets and Liabilities" herein.
In accordance with regulatory requirements, federal ITCs for the traditional electric operating companies and the natural gas distribution utilities, as well as certain state ITCs for Nicor Gas, are deferred, and, upon utilization, amortized over the average life of the related property with such amortization normally applied as a credit to reduce depreciation in the statements of income. CreditsSouthern Power's deferred federal ITCs are amortized to income tax expense over the life of the respective asset. ITCs amortized in 2018, 2017, and 2016 were immaterial for Alabama Power, Georgia Power, Mississippi Power, and Southern Company Gas and were as follows for Southern Company and Southern Power:
 Southern CompanySouthern Power
 (in millions)
2018$87
$58
201779
57
201659
37
Southern Power received $5 million of cash related to federal ITCs under renewable energy initiatives in 2018. No cash was received in 2017 or 2016. Southern Power recognized tax credits and reduced the tax basis of the asset by 50% of the ITCs received, resulting in a net deferred tax asset. Southern Power has elected to recognize the tax benefit of this manner amountedbasis difference as a reduction to $4 million andincome tax expense in the year in which the plant reaches commercial operation. The tax benefit of the related basis differences reduced income tax expense by $1 million for the successor periods of the year ended December 31,in 2018, $18 million in 2017, and July 1, 2016 through December 31,$173 million in 2016. See "Unrecognized Tax Benefits" herein for further information.
State ITCs and other state credits, which are recognized in the period in which the credits are generated, reduced Georgia Power's income tax expense by $21 million in 2018, $37 million in 2017, and $31 million in 2016 and forreduced Southern Power's income tax expense by $32 million in 2017 and $7 million in 2016.
Southern Power's federal and state PTCs, which are recognized in the predecessor periodsperiod in which the credits are generated, reduced Southern Power's income tax expense by $141 million in 2018, $139 million in 2017, and $50 million in 2016.
Legal Entity Reorganizations
In April 2018, Southern Power completed the final stage of January 1, 2016 through June 30, 2016a legal entity reorganization of various direct and the year ended December 31, 2015,indirect subsidiaries that own and operate substantially all of its solar facilities, including certain subsidiaries owned in partnership with various third parties. In September 2018, Southern Power also completed a legal entity reorganization of eight operating wind facilities under a new holding company, SP Wind. The reorganizations resulted in net state tax benefits related to certain changes in apportionment rates totaling approximately $65 million, which were $1 million and $2 million, respectively. At December 31, 2017, all ITCs available to reduce federal income taxes payable had been utilized.recorded in 2018.
Effective Tax Rate
Southern Company's effective tax rate is typically lower than the statutory rate due to employee stock plans' dividend deduction, non-taxable AFUDC equity at the traditional electric operating companies, flowback of excess deferred income taxes at the regulated utilities, and federal income tax benefits from ITCs and PTCs primarily at Southern Power. Each registrant's effective tax rate for 2018 varied significantly as compared to 2017 due to the 14% lower 2018 federal tax rate resulting from the Tax Reform Legislation.

COMBINED NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)
Southern Company and Subsidiary Companies 2018 Annual Report

A reconciliation of the federal statutory income tax rate to the effective income tax rate is as follows:
Successor  Predecessor2018
Year ended December 31, 2017 July 1, 2016 through December 31,
2016
  January 1, 2016 through June 30, 2016 Year ended December 31, 2015Southern CompanyAlabama Power
Georgia
Power
Mississippi PowerSouthern Power
Federal statutory rate35.0% 35.0%  35.0% 35.0%21.0 %21.0 %21.0 %21.0 %21.0 %
State income tax, net of federal deduction4.0 4.0  3.5 3.41.8
5.0
5.5
(65.1)(90.8)
Employee stock plans' dividend deduction(1.0)



Non-deductible book depreciation0.8
0.6
1.2
0.7

Flowback of excess deferred income taxes(4.0)(1.8)
(4.1)
AFUDC-Equity(1.0)(1.0)(1.4)

ITC basis difference(0.6)


(0.2)
Federal PTCs(4.7)


(156.6)
Amortization of ITC(2.0)(0.1)(0.2)(0.2)(55.4)
Tax impact from sale of subsidiaries8.6




Tax Reform Legislation15.0    (1.4)
(4.9)(26.3)96.1
State tax legislation and rate changes6.2    
Noncontrolling interests(0.4)


(14.9)
Other 1.0  (0.9) (2.0)(0.8)(0.1)0.1
(1.4)2.0
Effective income tax rate60.2% 40.0%  37.6% 36.4%
Effective income tax (benefit) rate16.3 %23.6 %21.3 %(75.4)%(198.8)%
 2017
 Southern CompanyAlabama Power
Georgia
Power
Mississippi Power(*)
Southern Power
Federal statutory rate35.0 %35.0 %35.0 %(35.0)%35.0 %
State income tax, net of federal deduction12.5
4.5
2.0
0.6
(22.2)
Employee stock plans' dividend deduction(4.0)



Non-deductible book depreciation3.1
0.9
0.7
0.1

Flowback of excess deferred income taxes(0.3)
(0.1)

AFUDC-Equity(2.6)(1.0)(0.6)

AFUDC-Equity portion of Kemper IGCC charge15.7


5.3

ITC basis difference(1.7)


(10.0)
Federal PTCs(12.1)


(72.5)
Amortization of ITC(4.2)(0.2)(0.1)
(20.6)
Tax Reform Legislation(25.6)0.3
(0.4)11.9
(416.1)
Noncontrolling interests(1.4)


(8.6)
Other(1.1)0.1
0.2

(10.7)
Effective income tax (benefit) rate13.3 %39.6 %36.7 %(17.1)%(525.7)%
(*)Represents effective income tax benefit rate for Mississippi Power due to a loss before income taxes in 2017.

COMBINED NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)
Southern Company and Subsidiary Companies 2018 Annual Report

 2016
 Southern CompanyAlabama Power
Georgia
Power
Mississippi Power(*)
Southern Power
Federal statutory rate35.0 %35.0 %35.0 %(35.0)%35.0 %
State income tax, net of federal deduction2.0
4.2
2.1
(5.7)(9.1)
Employee stock plans' dividend deduction(1.2)



Non-deductible book depreciation0.9
1.0
0.8
0.7

Flowback of excess deferred income taxes(0.1)
(0.1)(0.3)
AFUDC-Equity(2.0)(0.7)(0.8)(28.5)
ITC basis difference(5.0)


(96.3)
Federal PTCs(1.2)


(23.3)
Amortization of ITC(0.9)(0.2)(0.2)(0.1)(13.4)
Noncontrolling interests(0.3)


(6.2)
Other0.1
(0.5)(0.1)0.4
4.7
Effective income tax (benefit) rate27.3 %38.8 %36.7 %(68.5)%(108.6)%
(*)Represents effective income tax benefit rate for Mississippi Power due to a loss before income taxes in 2016.
 Southern Company Gas
 Successor  Predecessor
 Year Ended December 31, 2018Year Ended December 31, 2017
July 1, 2016
through
December 31, 2016
  
January 1, 2016
through
June 30, 2016
Federal statutory rate21.0%35.0%35.0%  35.0%
State income tax, net of federal deduction9.210.03.6  3.5
Flowback of excess deferred income taxes(3.0)(0.2)  
Amortization of ITC(0.1)(0.2)(0.4)  
Tax impact on sale of subsidiaries28.5  
Tax Reform Legislation(0.4)15.0  
Other0.30.61.8  (0.9)
Effective income tax rate55.5%60.2%40.0%  37.6%
    Table of Contents                                Index to Financial Statements

COMBINED NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)
Southern Company Gas and Subsidiary Companies 20172018 Annual Report


Deferred Tax Assets and Liabilities
The principaltax effects of temporary differences between the carrying amounts of assets and liabilities in the Company's effectivefinancial statements of the registrants and their respective tax rate from December 31, 2016bases, which give rise to December 31, 2017 include the impactdeferred tax assets and liabilities, are as follows:
 December 31, 2018
 Southern CompanyAlabama PowerGeorgia
Power
Mississippi PowerSouthern PowerSouthern Company Gas
 (in millions)
Deferred tax liabilities —  
   
Accelerated depreciation$8,461
$2,236
$3,005
$335
$1,483
$1,176
Property basis differences1,807
865
633
162

134
Federal effect of net state deferred tax assets


36


Leveraged lease basis differences253





Employee benefit obligations477
149
290
25
6
6
Premium on reacquired debt88
14
74



Regulatory assets –      
Storm damage reserves111

111



Employee benefit obligations975
260
344
45

45
AROs1,232
276
925
31


AROs1,210
607
575



Other593
177
141
68
34
132
Total deferred income tax liabilities15,207
4,584
6,098
702
1,523
1,493
Deferred tax assets —      
Federal effect of net state deferred tax liabilities260
155
71

22
46
Employee benefit obligations1,273
286
444
62
7
150
Other property basis differences251

61

172

ITC and PTC carryforward2,730
11
430

2,128

Alternative minimum tax carryforward62


32
21

Other partnership basis difference162



162

Other comprehensive losses82
10
3



AROs2,442
883
1,500
31


Estimated loss on plants under construction346

283
63


Other deferred state tax attributes415

19
251
72

Regulatory liability associated with the Tax Reform Legislation (not subject to normalization)294
130
127
29

8
Other731
147
140
47
47
285
Total deferred income tax assets9,048
1,622
3,078
515
2,631
489
Valuation allowance(123)
(42)(41)(27)(12)
Net deferred income tax assets8,925
1,622
3,036
474
2,604
477
Net deferred income taxes (assets)/liabilities$6,282
$2,962
$3,062
$228
$(1,081)$1,016
   

   
Recognized in the balance sheets:  

   
Accumulated deferred income
taxes – assets
$(276)$
$
$(150)$(1,186)$
Accumulated deferred income
taxes – liabilities
$6,558
$2,962
$3,062
$378
$105
$1,016

COMBINED NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)
Southern Company and Subsidiary Companies 2018 Annual Report

 December 31, 2017
 Southern CompanyAlabama PowerGeorgia
Power
Mississippi PowerSouthern PowerSouthern Company Gas
 (in millions)
Deferred tax liabilities —      
Accelerated depreciation$9,059
$2,135
$2,889
$303
$1,922
$1,150
Property basis differences1,853
725
606
207
2
204
Federal effect of net state deferred tax assets


9


Leveraged lease basis differences251





Employee benefit obligations527
162
287
28
7
4
Premium on reacquired debt54
16
34



Regulatory assets –      
Storm damage reserves89

89



Employee benefit obligations1,044
260
349
46

75
AROs821
249
501
33


AROs370
220
130



Other689
147
140
73
30
208
Total deferred income tax liabilities14,757
3,914
5,025
699
1,961
1,641
Deferred tax assets —      
Federal effect of net state deferred tax liabilities330
143
85

42
54
Employee benefit obligations1,339
286
448
62
8
185
Other property basis differences343

59

184

ITC and PTC carryforward2,414
9
403

2,002

Federal NOL carryforward518


40
333
92
Alternative minimum tax carryforward69


32
21

Other partnership basis difference23



23

Other comprehensive losses84
10
4

1

AROs1,191
469
631
33


Estimated loss on plants under construction722


722


Other deferred state tax attributes330

6
133
77

Regulatory liability associated with the Tax Reform Legislation (not subject to normalization)304
126
123
27

9
Other538
111
91
54
9
223
Total deferred income tax assets8,205
1,154
1,850
1,103
2,700
563
Valuation allowance(184)

(157)(13)(11)
Net deferred income tax assets8,021
1,154
1,850
946
2,687
552
Net deferred income taxes (assets)/liabilities$6,736
$2,760
$3,175
$(247)$(726)$1,089
       
Recognized in the balance sheets:      
Accumulated deferred income
taxes – assets
$(106)$
$
$(247)$(925)$
Accumulated deferred income
taxes – liabilities
$6,842
$2,760
$3,175
$
$199
$1,089
The implementation of the Tax Reform Legislation significantly reduced accumulated deferred income taxes in 2017, partially offset by bonus depreciation provisions in the IllinoisPATH Act.
The traditional electric operating companies and natural gas distribution utilities have tax-related regulatory assets (deferred income tax legislation enacted in the third quarter 2017, newcharges) and regulatory liabilities (deferred income tax apportionment factorscredits). The regulatory assets are primarily attributable to tax benefits flowed through to customers in several states resulting fromprior years, deferred taxes previously recognized at rates lower than the Company's inclusion in the consolidated current enacted

COMBINED NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)
Southern Company and Subsidiary Companies 2018 Annual Report

tax law, and taxes applicable to capitalized interest. The regulatory liabilities are primarily attributable to deferred taxes previously recognized at rates higher than the current enacted tax law and to unamortized ITCs. See Note 2 for each registrant's related balances at December 31, 2018 and 2017.
Tax Credit Carryforwards
Federal ITC/PTC carryforwards at December 31, 2018 were as follows:
 Southern Company
Alabama
Power
Georgia
Power
Southern
Power
 (in millions)
Federal ITC/PTC carryforwards$2,410
$11
$108
$2,128
Year in which federal ITC/PTC carryforwards begin expiring2032
2033
2032
2034
Year by which federal ITC/PTC carryforwards are expected to be utilized2022
2021
2021
2022
The estimated tax credit utilization reflects the 2018 abandonment loss related to certain Kemper County energy facility expenditures as well as the projected taxable gains on the various sale transactions described in Note 15 and "Legal Entity Reorganizations" herein. The expected utilization of tax credit carryforwards could be further delayed by numerous factors, including the acquisition of additional renewable projects, the purchase of rights to additional PTCs of Plant Vogtle Units 3 and 4 pursuant to the MEAG Funding Agreement or the Global Amendments, and changes in taxable income projections. See Note 2 under "Georgia PowerNuclear Construction" for additional information on Plant Vogtle Units 3 and 4.
At December 31, 2018, Georgia Power also had approximately $341 million in state investment and other state tax filings,credit carryforwards for the disallowanceState of certain nondeductible Merger-related expensesGeorgia that will expire between 2020 and 2028 and are not expected to be fully utilized. Georgia Power has a net state valuation allowance of $33 million associated with change-in-control compensation charges,these carryforwards.
The ultimate outcome of these matters cannot be determined at this time.

COMBINED NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)
Southern Company and an increaseSubsidiary Companies 2018 Annual Report

Net Operating Loss Carryforwards
In the 2018 tax year, Southern Company expects to fully utilize the carryforward from federal NOLs generated in earnings before income taxes.2016 and 2017.
At December 31, 2018, the state and local NOL carryforwards for Southern Company's subsidiaries were as follows:
Company/JurisdictionApproximate NOL CarryforwardsApproximate Net State Income Tax Benefit
Tax Year NOL
Begins Expiring
 (in millions) 
Mississippi Power   
Mississippi$5,062
$200
2031
    
Southern Power   
Oklahoma846
40
2035
Florida264
11
2033
South Carolina62
2
2034
Other states42
3
2029
Southern Power Total$1,214
$56
 
    
Other(*)
   
Georgia358
16
2019
New York223
11
2036
New York City208
15
2036
Other states278
14
Various
Southern Company Total$7,343
$312

(*)Represents other Southern Company subsidiaries. Alabama Power, Georgia Power, and Southern Company Gas did not have state NOL carryforwards at December 31, 2018.
State NOLs for Mississippi, Oklahoma, and Florida are not expected to be fully utilized prior to expiration. At December 31, 2018, Mississippi Power had a net state valuation allowance of $32 million for the Mississippi NOL and Southern Power had a net state valuation allowance of $9 million for the Oklahoma NOL and $11 million for the Florida NOL.
The ultimate outcome of these matters cannot be determined at this time.

COMBINED NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)
Southern Company and Subsidiary Companies 2018 Annual Report

Unrecognized Tax Benefits
Unrecognized tax benefits changes in 2018, 2017, and 2016 for Southern Company, Mississippi Power, and Southern Power are provided below. The Company hasremaining registrants did not have any material unrecognized tax benefits for the periods presented.
 Southern CompanyMississippi PowerSouthern Power
 (in millions)
Unrecognized tax benefits at December 31, 2015$433
$421
$8
Tax positions changes –   
Increase from current periods45
26
17
Increase from prior periods21
18

Decrease from prior periods(15)
(8)
Unrecognized tax benefits at December 31, 2016484
465
17
Tax positions changes –   
Increase from current periods10


Increase from prior periods10
2

Decrease from prior periods(196)(177)(17)
Reductions due to settlements(290)(290)
Unrecognized tax benefits at December 31, 201718


Tax positions changes –   
Decrease from prior periods(18)

Unrecognized tax benefits at December 31, 2018$
$
$
Mississippi Power's tax positions increase from current and prior periods for 2017 and 2016 relate to state tax benefits, deductions for R&E expenditures, and charitable contribution carryforwards that were impacted as a result of the settlement of R&E expenditures associated with the Kemper County energy facility, as well as federal income tax benefits from deferred ITCs. Mississippi Power's tax positions decrease from prior periods and the reductions due to settlements for 2017 relate primarily to the settlement of R&E expenditures associated with the Kemper County energy facility. See Note 2 under "Mississippi PowerKemper County Energy Facility" and "Section 174 Research and Experimental Deduction" herein for more information.
Southern Power's increase in unrecognized tax benefits from current periods for 2016, and the decrease from prior periods for 2017 and 2016, primarily relate to federal income tax benefits from deferred ITCs.
There were no unrecognized tax benefits at December 31, 2018. The impact on the effective tax rate of Southern Company, Mississippi Power, and Southern Power, if recognized, was as follows for any period presented.2017 and 2016:
The
 Southern CompanyMississippi PowerSouthern Power
 (in millions)
2017   
Tax positions impacting the effective tax rate$18
$
$
Tax positions not impacting the effective tax rate


Balance of unrecognized tax benefits$18
$
$
    
2016   
Tax positions impacting the effective tax rate$20
$1
$17
Tax positions not impacting the effective tax rate464
464

Balance of unrecognized tax benefits$484
$465
$17
Mississippi Power's tax positions not impacting the effective tax rate for 2016 relate to deductions for R&E expenditures associated with the Kemper County energy facility. See "Section 174 Research and Experimental Deduction" herein for more information. These amounts are presented on a gross basis without considering the related federal or state income tax impact.

COMBINED NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)
Southern Company classifiesand Subsidiary Companies 2018 Annual Report

Southern Power's impact on the effective tax rate was determined based on the amount of ITCs, which were uncertain.
All of the registrants classify interest on tax uncertainties as interest expense; however,expense. Accrued interest for all tax positions other than the Company had noSection 174 R&E deductions was immaterial for all years presented. None of the registrants accrued interest orany penalties for unrecognizedon uncertain tax benefits for any period presented.positions.
It is reasonably possible that the amount of the unrecognized tax benefits could change within 12 months. The settlement of federal and stateNew audit findings or settlements associated with ongoing audits could impact the balances.result in significant unrecognized tax benefits. At this time, an estimate of thea range of reasonably possible outcomes cannot be determined.
On July 1, 2016, the Company became a wholly-owned subsidiaryThe IRS has finalized its audits of Southern Company's consolidated federal income tax returns through 2017, as well as the pre-Merger Southern Company whichGas tax returns. Southern Company is a participant in the Compliance Assurance Process of the IRS. The IRS has finalized its audits of Southern Company's consolidated federal tax returns through 2016. However, the pre-Merger Southern Company Gas 2014, 2015, and June 30, 2016 federal tax returns are currently under audit. The audits for the Company by anyregistrants' state income tax returns have either been concluded, or the statute of limitations has expired, with respect to income tax examinations, for years prior to 2011.2012.
Section 174 Research and Experimental Deduction
Southern Company, on behalf of Mississippi Power, has reflected deductions for R&E expenditures related to the Kemper County energy facility in its federal income tax calculations since 2013 and filed amended federal income tax returns for 2008 through 2013 to also include such deductions. In September 2017, the U.S. Congress Joint Committee on Taxation approved a settlement between Southern Company and the IRS, resolving a methodology for these deductions. As a result of this approval, Mississippi Power recognized $176 million in 2017 of previously unrecognized tax benefits and reversed $36 million of associated accrued interest.
6. FINANCING11. RETIREMENT BENEFITS
The Company's 100%-owned subsidiary,Southern Company system has a qualified defined benefit, trusteed, pension plan covering substantially all employees, with the exception of employees at PowerSecure. The qualified defined benefit pension plan is funded in accordance with requirements of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974, as amended (ERISA). No contributions to the qualified pension plan were made for the year ended December 31, 2018 and no mandatory contributions to the qualified pension plan are anticipated for the year ending December 31, 2019. The Southern Company system also provides certain non-qualified defined benefits for a select group of management and highly compensated employees, which are funded on a cash basis. In addition, the Southern Company system provides certain medical care and life insurance benefits for retired employees through other postretirement benefit plans. The traditional electric operating companies fund other postretirement trusts to the extent required by their respective regulatory commissions. Southern Company Gas Capital, was establishedhas a separate unfunded supplemental retirement health care plan that provides medical care and life insurance benefits to provide for certainemployees of discontinued businesses. For the Company's ongoing financing needs through a commercial paper program, the issuance of various debt, hybrid securities, and other financing arrangements. Southern Company Gas fully and unconditionally guarantees all debt issued by Southern Company Gas Capital and the gas facility revenue bonds issued by Pivotal Utility Holdings. Additionally, substantially all of Nicor Gas' properties are subject to the lien of the indenture securing its first mortgage bonds. Nicor Gas is not permitted by regulation to make loans to affiliates or utilize Southern Company Gas Capital for its financing needs.
Securities Due Within One Year
The current portion of long-term debt is composed of the portion of its long-term debt due within the next 12 months. Atyear ending December 31, 2017,2019, no other postretirement trust contributions are expected.
On January 1, 2018, the Company had $157 million of senior notes due within one year, including the fair value adjustment attributable to the application of acquisition accounting. At December 31, 2016, the Company had $22 million of medium-term notes due within one year.
Long-Term Debt
Long-term debt of the Company at December 31, 2017 and 2016 consisted of Series A, Series B, and Series C medium-term notes of Atlanta Gas Light; senior notesqualified defined benefit pension plan of Southern Company Gas Capital; first mortgage bondswas merged into the Southern Company system's qualified defined benefit pension plan and the pension plan was reopened to all non-union employees of Nicor Gas; and gas facility revenue bonds of Pivotal Utility Holdings.
Maturities through 2022 applicableSouthern Company Gas. Prior to total long-term debt are as follows: $155 million in 2018; $350 million in 2019; $330 million in 2021; $93 million in 2022; and $4.6 billion thereafter. There are no material scheduled maturities in 2020.
Medium-Term Notes
In July 2017, Atlanta Gas Light repaid at maturity $22 million of medium-term notes. The amount of medium-term notes outstanding at December 31, 2017 and 2016 was $159 million and $181 million, respectively, including securities due within one year.
Senior Notes
In May 2017,January 1, 2018, Southern Company Gas Capital issued $450had a separate qualified defined benefit, trusteed, pension plan covering certain eligible employees, which was closed in 2012 to new employees. Also on January 1, 2018, Southern Company Gas' non-qualified retirement plans were merged into the Southern Company system's non-qualified retirement plan (defined benefit and defined contribution).
Effective in December 2017, 538 employees transferred from SCS to Southern Power. Accordingly, Southern Power assumed various compensation and benefit plans including participation in the Southern Company system's qualified defined benefit, trusteed, pension plan covering substantially all employees. With the transfer of employees, Southern Power assumed the related benefit obligations from SCS of $139 million aggregate principal amountfor the qualified pension plan (along with trust assets of Series 2017A 4.40% Senior Notes due May 30, 2047.$138 million) and $11 million for other postretirement benefit plans, together with $36 million in prior service costs and net gains/losses in OCI. In 2018, Southern Power also began providing certain defined benefits under the non-qualified pension plan for a select group of management and highly compensated employees. No obligation related to these benefits was assumed in the employee transfer; however, obligations for services rendered by employees following the transfer are being recognized by Southern Power and are funded on a cash basis. In addition, Southern Power provides certain medical care and life insurance benefits for retired employees through other postretirement benefit plans that are funded on a cash basis. Prior to the transfer of employees in December 2017, substantially all expenses charged by SCS, including pension and other postretirement benefit costs, were recorded in Southern Power's other operations and maintenance expense. The proceeds were useddisclosures included herein exclude Southern Power for periods prior to repay the transfer of employees in December 2017.
On January 1, 2019, Southern Company completed the sale of Gulf Power to NextEra Energy. See Note 15 under "Southern Company's short-term indebtednessSale of Gulf Power" for additional information. The portion of the Southern Company system's pension and for general corporate purposes. The amount of senior notes outstanding at December 31, 2017 and 2016 was $4.2 billion and $3.7 billion, respectively, including securities due within one year.other
    Table of Contents                                Index to Financial Statements

COMBINED NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)
Southern Company Gas and Subsidiary Companies 20172018 Annual Report


First Mortgage Bonds
Nicor Gas had $1.0 billion and $625 million of first mortgage bonds outstandingpostretirement benefit plans attributable to Gulf Power that is reflected in Southern Company's consolidated balance sheet as held for sale at December 31, 2017 and 2016, respectively. These bonds have been issued with maturities ranging from 2019 to 2057.
On August 10, 2017, Nicor Gas issued $100 million aggregate principal amount of First Mortgage Bonds 3.03% Series due August 10, 2027 and $100 million aggregate principal amount of First Mortgage Bonds 3.62% Series due August 10, 2037. On November 1, 2017, Nicor Gas issued $100 million aggregate principal amount of First Mortgage Bonds 3.85% Series due August 10, 2047 and $100 million aggregate principal amount of First Mortgage Bonds 4.00% Series due August 10, 2057. The proceeds were used to repay short-term indebtedness incurred under the Nicor Gas commercial paper program and for other working capital needs.
Gas Facility Revenue Bonds
Pivotal Utility Holdings is party to a series of loan agreements with the New Jersey Economic Development Authority and Brevard County, Florida under which five series of gas facility revenue bonds have been issued with maturities ranging from 2022 to 2033. These revenue bonds are issued by state agencies or counties to investors, and proceeds from each issuance then are loaned to Pivotal Utility Holdings. The amount of gas facility revenue bonds outstanding at December 31, 2017 and 2016 was $200 million.
The Elizabethtown Gas asset sale agreement requires that bonds representing $180 million of the total that are currently eligible for redemption at par be redeemed on or prior to consummation of the sale. The ultimate outcome of this matter cannot be determined at this time. See Note 11 under "Proposed Sale of Elizabethtown Gas and Elkton Gas" for additional information.
Parent Company Note
On January 4, 2018 Southern Company Gas issued a floating rate promissory note to Southern Company in an aggregate principal amount of $100 million due July 31, 2018, bearing interest based on one-month LIBOR.
Dividend Restrictions
By regulation, Nicor Gas is restricted, to the extent of its retained earnings balance, in the amount it can dividend or loan to affiliates and is not permitted to make money pool loans to affiliates. The New Jersey BPU restricts the amount Elizabethtown Gas can dividend to its parent company to 70% of its quarterly net income. Additionally, as stipulated in the New Jersey BPU's order approving the Merger, the Company is prohibited from paying dividends to its parent company, Southern Company, if the Company's senior unsecured debt rating falls below investment grade. As of December 31, 2017, the amount of subsidiary retained earnings restricted for dividend payment totaled $719 million.
Bank Credit Arrangements
Credit Facilities
At December 31, 2017, committed credit arrangements with banks were as follows:consists of:
Company Expires 2022 Unused
  (in millions)
Southern Company Gas Capital $1,400
 $1,390
Nicor Gas 500
 500
Total $1,900
 $1,890
 
Pension
Plans
Other Postretirement Benefit Plans
 (in millions)
Projected benefit obligation$526
$69
Plan assets492
17
Accrued liability$(34)$(52)
In May 2017,All amounts presented in the remainder of this note reflect the benefit plan obligations and related plan assets for the Southern Company Gas Capitalsystem's pension and Nicor Gas terminated their existing credit arrangements for $1.3 billion and $700 million, respectively, which wereother postretirement benefit plans, including the amounts attributable to mature in 2017 and 2018, and entered into a new multi-year credit arrangement (Facility) currently allocated for $1.4 billion and $500 million, respectively, with a maturity date of 2022, as reflectedGulf Power.
Actuarial Assumptions
The weighted average rates assumed in the table above. Pursuantactuarial calculations used to determine both the Facility,net periodic costs for the allocations between Southern Company Gas Capitalpension and Nicor Gas may be adjusted.
The Facility contains a covenant that limitsother postretirement benefit plans for the ratio of debt to capitalization (as defined in each facility) to a maximum of 70% for eachfollowing year and the benefit obligations as of the Company and Nicor Gas and contains a cross-acceleration provision to other indebtedness (including guarantee obligations) of the applicable company. Such cross-acceleration provision to other indebtedness would trigger an event of default of the applicable company if the Company or Nicor Gas defaulted on indebtedness, the payment of which was then accelerated. At December 31, 2017, both companies were in compliance with such covenant. The Facility does not contain a material adverse change clause at the time of borrowings.measurement date are presented below.
 2018
Assumptions used to determine net
periodic costs:
Southern CompanyAlabama PowerGeorgia
Power
Mississippi PowerSouthern Power
Pension plans     
Discount rate – benefit obligations3.80%3.81%3.79%3.80%3.94%
Discount rate – interest costs3.45
3.45
3.42
3.46
3.69
Discount rate – service costs3.98
4.00
3.99
3.99
4.01
Expected long-term return on plan assets7.95
7.95
7.95
7.95
7.95
Annual salary increase4.34
4.46
4.46
4.46
4.46
Other postretirement benefit plans     
Discount rate – benefit obligations3.68%3.71%3.68%3.68%3.81%
Discount rate – interest costs3.29
3.31
3.29
3.29
3.47
Discount rate – service costs3.91
3.93
3.91
3.91
3.93
Expected long-term return on plan assets6.83
6.83
6.80
6.99

Annual salary increase4.34
4.46
4.46
4.46
4.46
    Table of Contents                                Index to Financial Statements

COMBINED NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)
Southern Company Gas and Subsidiary Companies 20172018 Annual Report


Commercial Paper Programs
The Company maintains commercial paper programs at Southern Company Gas Capital and at Nicor Gas that consist of short-term, unsecured promissory notes. Nicor Gas' commercial paper program supports working capital needs at Nicor Gas as Nicor Gas is not permitted to make money pool loans to affiliates. All of the Company's other subsidiaries benefit from Southern Company Gas Capital's commercial paper program. Commercial paper is included in notes payable in the balance sheets.
Details of commercial paper borrowings outstanding were as follows:
  Short-term Debt at the End of the Period
  Amount
Outstanding
 Weighted Average Interest Rate
  (in millions)  
December 31, 2017:    
Southern Company Gas Capital $1,243
 1.73%
Nicor Gas 275
 1.83
Total $1,518
 1.75%
     
December 31, 2016:    
Southern Company Gas Capital $733
 1.09%
Nicor Gas 524
 0.95
Total $1,257
 1.03%
7. COMMITMENTS
Pipeline Charges, Storage Capacity, and Gas Supply
Pipeline charges, storage capacity, and gas supply include charges recoverable through a natural gas cost recovery mechanism, or alternatively, billed to Marketers and demand charges associated with Sequent. The gas supply balance includes amounts for Nicor Gas' and SouthStar's gas commodity purchase commitments of 35 million mmBtu at floating gas prices calculated using forward natural gas prices at December 31, 2017 and valued at $101 million. The Company provides guarantees to certain gas suppliers for certain of its subsidiaries in support of payment obligations.
Expected future contractual obligations for pipeline charges, storage capacity, and gas supply that are not recognized on the balance sheets as of December 31, 2017 were as follows:
 2017
Assumptions used to determine net
periodic costs:
Southern CompanyAlabama
Power
Georgia
Power
Mississippi Power
Pension plans    
Discount rate – benefit obligations4.40%4.44%4.40%4.44%
Discount rate – interest costs3.77
3.76
3.72
3.81
Discount rate – service costs4.81
4.85
4.83
4.83
Expected long-term return on plan assets7.92
7.95
7.95
7.95
Annual salary increase4.37
4.46
4.46
4.46
Other postretirement benefit plans    
Discount rate – benefit obligations4.23%4.27%4.23%4.22%
Discount rate – interest costs3.54
3.58
3.55
3.55
Discount rate – service costs4.64
4.70
4.63
4.65
Expected long-term return on plan assets6.84
6.83
6.79
6.88
Annual salary increase4.37
4.46
4.46
4.46
 Pipeline Charges, Storage Capacity, and Gas Supply
 (in millions)
2018$813
2019552
2020416
2021375
2022339
2023 and thereafter2,294
Total$4,789
Operating Leases
The Company has operating lease agreements with various terms and expiration dates. Total rent expense was $15 million, $8 million, $6 million, and $12 million for the successor periods of the year ended December 31, 2017 and July 1, 2016 through December 31, 2016 and the predecessor periods of January 1, 2016 through June 30, 2016 and the year ended December 31, 2015, respectively. The Company includes any step rents, escalations, and lease concessions in its computation of minimum lease payments, which are recognized on a straight-line basis over the minimum lease terms.
 2016
Assumptions used to determine net periodic costs:Southern CompanyAlabama
Power
Georgia
Power
Mississippi Power
Pension plans    
Discount rate – benefit obligations4.58%4.67%4.65%4.69%
Discount rate – interest costs3.88
3.90
3.86
3.97
Discount rate – service costs4.98
5.07
5.03
5.04
Expected long-term return on plan assets8.16
8.20
8.20
8.20
Annual salary increase4.37
4.46
4.46
4.46
Other postretirement benefit plans    
Discount rate – benefit obligations4.38%4.51%4.49%4.47%
Discount rate – interest costs3.66
3.69
3.67
3.66
Discount rate – service costs4.85
4.96
4.88
4.88
Expected long-term return on plan assets6.66
6.83
6.27
7.07
Annual salary increase4.37
4.46
4.46
4.46
    Table of Contents                                Index to Financial Statements

COMBINED NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)
Southern Company Gas and Subsidiary Companies 20172018 Annual Report


As
 Southern Company Gas
 Successor  Predecessor
Assumptions used to determine net periodic costs:Year Ended December 31, 2018Year Ended December 31, 2017
July 1, 2016
through
December 31, 2016
  
January 1, 2016
through
June 30, 2016
Pension plans      
Discount rate – benefit obligations3.74%4.39%3.85%  4.60%
Discount rate – interest costs3.41
3.76
3.21
  4.00
Discount rate – service costs3.84
4.64
4.07
  4.80
Expected long-term return on plan assets7.95
7.60
7.75
  7.80
Annual salary increase3.07
3.50
3.50
  3.70
Pension band increase(*)
N/A
N/A
2.00
  2.00
Other postretirement benefit plans      
Discount rate - benefit obligations3.62%4.15%3.61%  4.40%
Discount rate – interest costs3.21
3.40
2.84
  3.60
Discount rate – service costs3.82
4.55
3.96
  4.70
Expected long-term return on plan assets5.89
6.03
5.93
  6.60
Annual salary increase3.07
3.50
3.50
  3.70
(*)Only applicable to Nicor Gas union employees. The pension bands for the former Nicor Gas plan reflect the negotiated rates in accordance with the union agreements.
 2018
Assumptions used to determine benefit obligations:Southern CompanyAlabama PowerGeorgia PowerMississippi PowerSouthern PowerSouthern Company Gas
Pension plans      
Discount rate4.49%4.51%4.48%4.49%4.65%4.47%
Annual salary increase4.34
4.46
4.46
4.46
4.46
3.07
Other postretirement benefit plans      
Discount rate4.37%4.40%4.36%4.35%4.50%4.32%
Annual salary increase4.34
4.46
4.46
4.46
4.46
3.07
 2017
Assumptions used to determine benefit obligations:Southern CompanyAlabama PowerGeorgia PowerMississippi PowerSouthern PowerSouthern Company Gas
Pension plans      
Discount rate3.80%3.81%3.79%3.80%3.94%3.74%
Annual salary increase4.32
4.46
4.46
4.46
4.46
2.88
Other postretirement benefit plans      
Discount rate3.68%3.71%3.68%3.68%3.81%3.62%
Annual salary increase4.32
4.46
4.46
4.46
4.46
2.56
The registrants estimate the expected rate of return on pension plan and other postretirement benefit plan assets using a financial model to project the expected return on each current investment portfolio. The analysis projects an expected rate of return on each of the different asset classes in order to arrive at the expected return on the entire portfolio relying on each trust's target asset allocation and reasonable capital market assumptions. The financial model is based on four key inputs: anticipated returns by asset class (based in part on historical returns), each trust's target asset allocation, an anticipated inflation rate, and the projected impact of a periodic rebalancing of each trust's portfolio.

COMBINED NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)
Southern Company and Subsidiary Companies 2018 Annual Report

An additional assumption used in measuring the accumulated other postretirement benefit obligations (APBO) was a weighted average medical care cost trend rate. The weighted average medical care cost trend rates used in measuring the APBO for the registrants at December 31, 2017, the Company's estimated minimum lease payments under operating leases2018 were as follows:
 Minimum Lease Payments
 (in millions)
2018$17
201916
202016
202115
202213
2023 and thereafter26
Total$103
 Initial Cost Trend Rate Ultimate Cost Trend Rate Year That Ultimate Rate is Reached
Pre-656.50% 4.50% 2028
Post-65 medical5.00
 4.50
 2028
Post-65 prescription8.00
 4.50
 2028
Financial Guarantees
AGL Equipment Leasing Inc. (AEL), a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Company, holds the Company's interest in Triton and has anPension Plans
The total accumulated benefit obligation to restore to zero any deficit in its equity account for income tax purposes in the unlikely event that Triton is liquidated and a deficit balance remains. This obligation continues for the life of the Triton partnerships. Any payment is effectively limited to the net assets of AEL, which were less than $1 millionpension plans at December 31, 2017. 2018 and 2017 was as follows:
 Southern CompanyAlabama PowerGeorgia PowerMississippi PowerSouthern PowerSouthern Company Gas
 (in millions)
December 31, 2018$11,683
$2,550
$3,613
$513
$101
$842
December 31, 201712,577
2,696
3,847
541
111
1,139
The actuarial gain of $1.1 billion recorded in the remeasurement of the Southern Company believes the likelihood of any such payment by AEL is remote and, as such, no liability has been recorded for this obligationsystem pension plans at December 31, 2017.2018 was primarily due to a 69 basis point increase in the overall discount rate used to calculate the benefit obligation as a result of higher market interest rates. The actuarial loss of $1.3 billion recorded in the remeasurement of the Southern Company system pension plans at December 31, 2017 was primarily due to a 60 basis point decrease in the overall discount rate used to calculate the benefit obligation as a result of lower market interest rates.
Changes in the projected benefit obligations and the fair value of plan assets during the plan years ended December 31, 2018 and 2017 were as follows:
 2018
 Southern CompanyAlabama PowerGeorgia
Power
Mississippi PowerSouthern PowerSouthern Company Gas
 (in millions)
Change in benefit obligation      
Benefit obligation at beginning of year$13,808
$2,998
$4,188
$602
$139
$1,184
Dispositions(107)


(3)(104)
Service cost359
78
87
17
9
34
Interest cost464
101
139
20
5
39
Benefits paid(618)(124)(191)(24)(3)(98)
Actuarial (gain) loss(1,143)(237)(318)(58)(24)(148)
Balance at end of year12,763
2,816
3,905
557
123
907
Change in plan assets      
Fair value of plan assets at beginning of year12,992
2,836
4,058
563
138
1,068
Dispositions(107)


(3)(104)
Actual return (loss) on plan assets(711)(150)(218)(37)(9)(70)
Employer contributions55
13
14
3

2
Benefits paid(618)(124)(191)(24)(3)(98)
Fair value of plan assets at end of year11,611
2,575
3,663
505
123
798
Accrued liability$(1,152)$(241)$(242)$(52)$
$(109)

COMBINED NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)
Southern Company and Subsidiary Companies 2018 Annual Report

 2017
 Southern CompanyAlabama PowerGeorgia
Power
Mississippi PowerSouthern PowerSouthern Company Gas
 (in millions)
Change in benefit obligation      
Benefit obligation at beginning of year$12,385
$2,663
$3,800
$534
$
$1,133
Service cost293
63
74
15

23
Interest cost455
98
138
20

42
Benefits paid(596)(120)(187)(22)
(91)
Plan amendments(26)



(26)
Actuarial (gain) loss1,297
294
363
55

103
Obligations assumed from employee transfer



139

Balance at end of year13,808
2,998
4,188
602
139
1,184
Change in plan assets      
Fair value of plan assets at beginning of year11,583
2,517
3,621
499

983
Actual return (loss) on plan assets1,953
427
610
84

175
Employer contributions52
12
14
2

1
Benefits paid(596)(120)(187)(22)
(91)
Assets assumed from employee transfer



138

Fair value of plan assets at end of year12,992
2,836
4,058
563
138
1,068
Accrued liability$(816)$(162)$(130)$(39)$(1)$(116)
The projected benefit obligations for the qualified and non-qualified pension plans at December 31, 2018 are shown in the following table. All pension plan assets are related to the qualified pension plan.
 Southern CompanyAlabama PowerGeorgia PowerMississippi PowerSouthern PowerSouthern Company Gas
 (in millions)
Projected benefit obligations:      
Qualified pension plan$12,135
$2,692
$3,757
$527
$122
$866
Non-qualified pension plan629
124
148
30
1
41

COMBINED NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)
Southern Company and Subsidiary Companies 2018 Annual Report

Amounts recognized in the balance sheets at December 31, 2018 and 2017 related to the registrants' pension plans consist of the following:
 
Southern
  Company(*)
Alabama PowerGeorgia
Power
Mississippi PowerSouthern PowerSouthern Company Gas
 (in millions)
December 31, 2018:      
Prepaid pension costs$
$
$
$
$1
$
Other regulatory assets, deferred3,566
955
1,230
167

160
Other deferred charges and assets




74
Other current liabilities(55)(12)(15)(3)
(3)
Employee benefit obligations(1,097)(229)(227)(49)(1)(179)
Other regulatory liabilities, deferred(108)




AOCI97



26
(44)
       
December 31, 2017:      
Prepaid pension costs$
$
$23
$
$
$
Other regulatory assets, deferred3,273
890
1,105
158

217
Other deferred charges and assets




85
Other current liabilities(53)(12)(15)(3)
(3)
Employee benefit obligations(763)(150)(138)(36)(1)(198)
Other regulatory liabilities, deferred(118)




AOCI107



33
(42)
(*)Amounts for Southern Company exclude regulatory assets of $268 million associated with unamortized amounts in Southern Company Gas' pension plans prior to its acquisition by Southern Company on July 1, 2016.
Presented below are the amounts included in regulatory assets at December 31, 2018 and 2017 related to the portion of the defined benefit pension plan attributable to Southern Company, the traditional electric operating companies, and Southern Company Gas that had not yet been recognized in net periodic pension cost.
 
Southern
Company
(*)
Alabama PowerGeorgia
Power
Mississippi PowerSouthern Company Gas
 (in millions)
Balance at December 31, 2018     
Regulatory assets:     
Prior service cost$17
$6
$12
$2
$(17)
Net (gain) loss3,441
949
1,218
165
83
Regulatory amortization(*)




94
Total regulatory assets (liabilities)$3,458
$955
$1,230
$167
$160
      
Balance at December 31, 2017     
Regulatory assets:     
Prior service cost$14
$8
$14
$3
$(20)
Net (gain) loss3,140
882
1,091
155
197
Regulatory amortization(*)




40
Total regulatory assets$3,154
$890
$1,105
$158
$217
(*)Amounts for Southern Company exclude regulatory assets of $268 million associated with unamortized amounts in Southern Company Gas' pension plans prior to its acquisition by Southern Company on July 1, 2016.

COMBINED NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)
Southern Company and Subsidiary Companies 2018 Annual Report

The changes in the balance of regulatory assets related to the portion of the defined benefit pension plan attributable to Southern Company, the traditional electric operating companies, and Southern Company Gas for the years ended December 31, 2018 and 2017 are presented in the following table:
 
Southern
Company
(*)
Alabama PowerGeorgia
Power
Mississippi PowerSouthern Company Gas
 (in millions)
Regulatory assets (liabilities):     
Balance at December 31, 2016$3,120
$870
$1,129
$154
$267
Net (gain) loss227
64
36
12
(31)
Change in prior service costs(26)



Reclassification adjustments:     
Amortization of prior service costs(11)(2)(3)(1)
Amortization of net gain (loss)(155)(42)(57)(7)(18)
Amortization of regulatory assets(*)




(1)
Total reclassification adjustments(166)(44)(60)(8)(19)
Total change35
20
(24)4
(50)
Balance at December 31, 2017$3,155
$890
$1,105
$158
$217
Net (gain) loss498
120
196
19
20
Change in prior service costs1



(18)
Dispositions12



(34)
Reclassification adjustments:     
Amortization of prior service costs(4)(1)(2)
2
Amortization of net gain (loss)(204)(54)(69)(10)(12)
Amortization of regulatory assets



(15)
Total reclassification adjustments(208)(55)(71)(10)(25)
Total change303
65
125
9
(57)
Balance at December 31, 2018$3,458
$955
$1,230
$167
$160
(*)Amounts for Southern Company exclude regulatory assets of $268 million associated with unamortized amounts in Southern Company Gas' pension plans prior to its acquisition by Southern Company on July 1, 2016.

COMBINED NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)
Southern Company and Subsidiary Companies 2018 Annual Report

Presented below are the amounts included in AOCI at December 31, 2018 and 2017 related to the portion of the defined benefit pension plan attributable to Southern Company, Southern Power, and Southern Company Gas that had not yet been recognized in net periodic pension cost.
 
Southern
Company
Southern
Power
Southern Company
Gas
 (in millions)
Balance at December 31, 2018   
AOCI:   
Prior service cost$(3)$
$(6)
Net (gain) loss100
26
(38)
Total AOCI$97
$26
$(44)
    
Balance at December 31, 2017   
AOCI:   
Prior service cost$3
$1
$
Net (gain) loss104
32
(42)
Total AOCI$107
$33
$(42)
The components of OCI related to the portion of the defined benefit pension plan attributable to Southern Company, Southern Power, and Southern Company Gas for the years ended December 31, 2018 and 2017 are presented in the following table:
 Southern Company
Southern
Power
Southern Company
Gas
 (in millions)
AOCI:   
Balance at December 31, 2016$100
$
$(43)
Net (gain) loss15

1
Change from employee transfer
33

Reclassification adjustments:   
Amortization of prior service costs(1)

Amortization of net gain (loss)(7)

Total reclassification adjustments(8)

Total change7
33
1
Balance at December 31, 2017$107
$33
$(42)
Net (gain) loss7
(5)6
Dispositions(8)
(8)
Reclassification adjustments:   
Amortization of net gain (loss)(9)(2)
Total reclassification adjustments(9)(2)
Total change(10)(7)(2)
Balance at December 31, 2018$97
$26
$(44)

COMBINED NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)
Southern Company and Subsidiary Companies 2018 Annual Report

Components of net periodic pension cost for Southern Company, the traditional electric operating companies, and Southern Power were as follows:
 Southern CompanyAlabama PowerGeorgia
Power
Mississippi PowerSouthern Power
 (in millions)
2018:     
Service cost$359
$78
$87
$17
$9
Interest cost464
101
139
20
5
Expected return on plan assets(943)(207)(296)(41)(10)
Recognized net (gain) loss213
54
69
10
1
Net amortization4
1
2


Net periodic pension cost$97
$27
$1
$6
$5
      
2017:     
Service cost$293
$63
$74
$15
 
Interest cost455
98
138
20
 
Expected return on plan assets(897)(196)(283)(40) 
Recognized net (gain) loss162
42
57
7
 
Net amortization12
2
3
1
 
Net periodic pension cost$25
$9
$(11)$3
 
      
2016:     
Service cost$262
$57
$70
$13
 
Interest cost422
95
136
19
 
Expected return on plan assets(782)(184)(258)(35) 
Recognized net (gain) loss150
40
55
7
 
Net amortization14
3
5
1
 
Net periodic pension cost$66
$11
$8
$5
 
Components of net periodic pension cost for Southern Company Gas were as follows:
 Southern Company Gas
 Successor  Predecessor
 Year Ended December 31, 2018Year Ended December 31, 2017
July 1, 2016
through
December 31, 2016
  
January 1, 2016
through
June 30, 2016
 (in millions)  (in millions)
Service cost$34
$23
$15
  $13
Interest cost39
42
20
  21
Expected return on plan assets(75)(70)(35)  (33)
Recognized net (gain) loss12
18
14
  13
Net amortization of regulatory asset15
1

  
Prior service cost(2)
(1)  (1)
Net periodic pension cost$23
$14
$13
  $13
Net periodic pension cost is the sum of service cost, interest cost, and other costs netted against the expected return on plan assets. The expected return on plan assets is determined by multiplying the expected rate of return on plan assets and the market-related value of plan assets. In determining the market-related value of plan assets, the registrants have elected to amortize changes in the

COMBINED NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)
Southern Company and Subsidiary Companies 2018 Annual Report

market value of all plan assets over five years rather than recognize the changes immediately. As a result, the accounting value of plan assets that is used to calculate the expected return on plan assets differs from the current fair value of the plan assets.
Future benefit payments reflect expected future service and are estimated based on assumptions used to measure the projected benefit obligation for the pension plans. At December 31, 2018, estimated benefit payments were as follows:
 Southern CompanyAlabama PowerGeorgia
Power
Mississippi PowerSouthern PowerSouthern Company Gas
 (in millions)
Benefit Payments:      
2019$623
$132
$201
$28
$3
$59
2020645
136
206
28
3
61
2021664
141
209
29
4
62
2022687
147
215
29
4
62
2023711
152
221
30
5
62
2024 to 20283,869
832
1,183
166
27
313
8.Other Postretirement Benefits
Changes in the APBO and the fair value of the registrants' plan assets during the plan years ended December 31, 2018 and 2017 were as follows:
 2018
 Southern CompanyAlabama PowerGeorgia
Power
Mississippi PowerSouthern PowerSouthern Company Gas
 (in millions)
Change in benefit obligation      
Benefit obligation at beginning of year$2,339
$517
$863
$97
$11
$310
Dispositions(18)



(18)
Service cost24
6
6
1
1
2
Interest cost75
17
28
3

10
Benefits paid(129)(28)(47)(5)(1)(17)
Actuarial (gain) loss(432)(111)(178)(15)(2)(43)
Retiree drug subsidy6
2
3



Balance at end of year1,865
403
675
81
9
244
Change in plan assets      
Fair value of plan assets at beginning of year1,053
406
386
25

125
Dispositions(18)



(18)
Actual return (loss) on plan assets(57)(25)(20)(1)
(5)
Employer contributions73
5
22
4
1
13
Benefits paid(123)(26)(44)(5)(1)(17)
Fair value of plan assets at end of year928
360
344
23

98
Accrued liability$(937)$(43)$(331)$(58)$(9)$(146)

COMBINED NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)
Southern Company and Subsidiary Companies 2018 Annual Report

 2017
 Southern CompanyAlabama PowerGeorgia
Power
Mississippi PowerSouthern PowerSouthern Company Gas
 (in millions)
Change in benefit obligation      
Benefit obligation at beginning of year$2,297
$501
$847
$97
$
$308
Service cost24
6
7
1

2
Interest cost79
17
29
3

10
Benefits paid(136)(29)(51)(6)
(19)
Actuarial (gain) loss65
20
28
1

3
Plan amendments3




3
Retiree drug subsidy7
2
3
1


Obligations assumed from employee transfer



11

Employee contributions




3
Balance at end of year2,339
517
863
97
11
310
Change in plan assets      
Fair value of plan assets at beginning of year944
367
354
23

105
Actual return (loss) on plan assets154
60
54
3

20
Employer contributions84
6
26
4

17
Employee contributions




3
Benefits paid(129)(27)(48)(5)
(20)
Fair value of plan assets at end of year1,053
406
386
25

125
Accrued liability$(1,286)$(111)$(477)$(72)$(11)$(185)
Amounts recognized in the balance sheets at December 31, 2018 and 2017 related to the registrants' other postretirement benefit plans consist of the following:
 
Southern
Company
(a)
Alabama PowerGeorgia
Power
Mississippi Power
Southern
  Power
Southern Company Gas
 (in millions)
December 31, 2018:      
Other regulatory assets, deferred(a)
$99
$
$60
$6
$
$(4)
Other current liabilities(6)




Employee benefit obligations(b)
(931)(43)(331)(58)(9)146
Other regulatory liabilities, deferred(77)(8)
(2)

AOCI(4)


1
(4)
       
December 31, 2017:      
Other regulatory assets, deferred(a)
$382
$63
$202
$18
$
$46
Other current liabilities(5)




Employee benefit obligations(b)
(1,281)(111)(477)(72)(11)(185)
Other regulatory liabilities, deferred(41)(7)
(1)

AOCI4



3
(3)
(a)Amounts for Southern Company exclude regulatory assets of $57 million associated with unamortized amounts in Southern Company Gas' other postretirement benefit plans prior to its acquisition by Southern Company on July 1, 2016.
(b)Included in other deferred credits and liabilities on Southern Power's consolidated balance sheets.

COMBINED NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)
Southern Company and Subsidiary Companies 2018 Annual Report

Presented below are the amounts included in net regulatory assets (liabilities) at December 31, 2018 and 2017 related to the other postretirement benefit plans of Southern Company, the traditional electric operating companies, and Southern Company Gas that had not yet been recognized in net periodic other postretirement benefit cost.
 
Southern
Company
(*)
Alabama PowerGeorgia
Power
Mississippi PowerSouthern Company Gas
 (in millions)
Balance at December 31, 2018     
Regulatory assets:     
Prior service cost$14
$8
$4
$
$2
Net (gain) loss8
(16)56
4
(43)
Regulatory amortization(*)




37
Total regulatory assets (liabilities)$22
$(8)$60
$4
$(4)
      
Balance at December 31, 2017     
Regulatory assets:     
Prior service cost$21
$11
$5
$
$(7)
Net (gain) loss320
45
197
17
47
Regulatory amortization(*)




6
Total regulatory assets$341
$56
$202
$17
$46
(*)Amounts for Southern Company exclude regulatory assets of $57 million associated with unamortized amounts in Southern Company Gas' other postretirement benefit plans prior to its acquisition by Southern Company on July 1, 2016.

COMBINED NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)
Southern Company and Subsidiary Companies 2018 Annual Report

The changes in the balance of net regulatory assets (liabilities) related to the other postretirement benefit plans for the plan years ended December 31, 2018 and 2017 are presented in the following table:
 
Southern
Company
(*)
Alabama PowerGeorgia
Power
Mississippi PowerSouthern Company Gas
 (in millions)
Net regulatory assets (liabilities):     
Balance at December 31, 2016$378
$76
$213
$19
$52
Net (gain) loss(21)(15)(2)(1)(5)
Change in prior service costs3




Reclassification adjustments:     
Amortization of prior service costs(6)(4)(1)
3
Amortization of net gain (loss)(13)(1)(8)(1)(4)
Total reclassification adjustments(19)(5)(9)(1)(1)
Total change(37)(20)(11)(2)(6)
Balance at December 31, 2017$341
$56
$202
$17
$46
Net (gain) loss(298)(60)(132)(12)(42)
Change in prior service costs



(2)
Reclassification adjustments:     
Amortization of prior service costs(7)(4)(1)

Amortization of net gain (loss)(14)(1)(9)(1)
Amortization of regulatory assets



(6)
Total reclassification adjustments(21)(5)(10)(1)(6)
Total change(319)(65)(142)(13)(50)
Balance at December 31, 2018$22
$(9)$60
$4
$(4)
(*)Amounts for Southern Company exclude regulatory assets of $57 million associated with unamortized amounts in Southern Company Gas' other postretirement benefit plans prior to its acquisition by Southern Company on July 1, 2016.
Presented below are the amounts included in AOCI at December 31, 2018 and 2017 related to the other postretirement benefit plans of Southern Company, Southern Power, and Southern Company Gas that had not yet been recognized in net periodic other postretirement benefit cost.
 Southern
Company
Southern
Power
Southern Company
Gas
 (in millions)
Balance at December 31, 2018   
AOCI:   
Prior service cost$1
$
$1
Net (gain) loss(5)1
(5)
Total AOCI$(4)$1
$(4)
    
Balance at December 31, 2017   
AOCI:   
Prior service cost$
$
$
Net (gain) loss4
3
(3)
Total AOCI$4
$3
$(3)

COMBINED NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)
Southern Company and Subsidiary Companies 2018 Annual Report

The components of OCI related to the other postretirement benefit plans for the plan years ended December 31, 2018 and 2017 are presented in the following table:
 Southern Company
Southern
Power
Southern Company Gas
 (in millions)
AOCI:   
Balance at December 31, 2016$7
$
$(3)
Net (gain) loss(3)
(1)
Change from employee transfer
3
1
Total change(3)3

Balance at December 31, 2017$4
$3
$(3)
Net (gain) loss(8)(2)(2)
Amortization of prior service costs

1
Total change(8)(2)(1)
Balance at December 31, 2018$(4)$1
$(4)
Components of the other postretirement benefit plans' net periodic cost for Southern Company, the traditional electric operating companies, and Southern Power were as follows:
 Southern CompanyAlabama PowerGeorgia
Power
Mississippi PowerSouthern Power
 (in millions)
2018:     
Service cost$24
$6
$6
$1
$1
Interest cost75
17
28
3

Expected return on plan assets(69)(26)(25)(2)
Net amortization21
5
10
1

Net periodic postretirement benefit cost$51
$2
$19
$3
$1
      
2017:     
Service cost$24
$6
$7
$1
 
Interest cost79
17
29
3
 
Expected return on plan assets(66)(25)(25)(1) 
Net amortization20
5
9
1
 
Net periodic postretirement benefit cost$57
$3
$20
$4
 
      
2016:     
Service cost$22
$5
$6
$1
 
Interest cost76
18
30
3
 
Expected return on plan assets(60)(25)(22)(1) 
Net amortization21
6
10
1
 
Net periodic postretirement benefit cost$59
$4
$24
$4
 

COMBINED NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)
Southern Company and Subsidiary Companies 2018 Annual Report

Components of the other postretirement benefit plans' net periodic cost for Southern Company Gas were as follows:
 Successor  Predecessor
 Year Ended December 31, 2018Year Ended December 31, 2017
July 1, 2016
through
December 31, 2016
  
January 1, 2016
through
June 30, 2016
 (in millions)  (in millions)
Service cost$2
$2
$1
  $1
Interest cost10
10
5
  5
Expected return on plan assets(7)(7)(3)  (3)
Amortization:      
Regulatory assets6

2
  
Prior service costs
(3)
  (1)
Net (gain)/loss
4

  2
Net periodic postretirement benefit cost$11
$6
$5
  $4
The registrants' future benefit payments, including prescription drug benefits, reflect expected future service and are estimated based on assumptions used to measure the APBO for the other postretirement benefit plans. The registrants' estimated benefit payments are reduced by drug subsidy receipts expected as a result of the Medicare Prescription Drug, Improvement, and Modernization Act of 2003 as follows:
 Southern CompanyAlabama PowerGeorgia
Power
Mississippi PowerSouthern PowerSouthern Company Gas
 (in millions)
Benefit payments:      
2019$136
$28
$51
$6
$
$18
2020136
28
50
6

18
2021136
29
50
6

19
2022137
29
50
6
1
19
2023137
29
49
7
1
19
2024 to 2028669
146
243
30
3
90
       
Subsidy receipts:      
2019$(7)$(2)$(3)$
$
$
2020(7)(2)(3)


2021(8)(2)(3)


2022(8)(2)(3)(1)

2023(8)(3)(4)(1)

2024 to 2028(41)(13)(18)(2)

       
Total:      
2019$129
$26
$48
$6
$
$18
2020129
26
47
6

18
2021128
27
47
6

19
2022129
27
47
5
1
19
2023129
26
45
6
1
19
2024 to 2028628
133
225
28
3
90

COMBINED NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)
Southern Company and Subsidiary Companies 2018 Annual Report

Benefit Plan Assets
Pension plan and other postretirement benefit plan assets are managed and invested in accordance with all applicable requirements, including ERISA and the Internal Revenue Code. The registrants' investment policies for both the pension plans and the other postretirement benefit plans cover a diversified mix of assets as described below. Derivative instruments may be used to gain efficient exposure to the various asset classes and as hedging tools. Additionally, the registrants minimize the risk of large losses primarily through diversification but also monitor and manage other aspects of risk.
The investment strategy for plan assets related to the Southern Company system's qualified pension plan is to be broadly diversified across major asset classes. The asset allocation is established after consideration of various factors that affect the assets and liabilities of the pension plan including, but not limited to, historical and expected returns and interest rates, volatility, correlations of asset classes, the current level of assets and liabilities, and the assumed growth in assets and liabilities. Because a significant portion of the liability of the pension plans is long-term in nature, the assets are invested consistent with long-term investment expectations for return and risk. To manage the actual asset class exposures relative to the target asset allocation, the Southern Company system employs a formal rebalancing program. As additional risk management, external investment managers and service providers are subject to written guidelines to ensure appropriate and prudent investment practices. Management believes the portfolio is well-diversified with no significant concentrations of risk.
Investment Strategies and Benefit Plan Asset Fair Values
A description of the major asset classes that the pension and other postretirement benefit plans are comprised of, along with the valuation methods used for fair value measurement, is provided below:
DescriptionValuation Methodology
Domestic equity: A mix of large and small capitalization stocks with generally an equal distribution of value and growth attributes, managed both actively and through passive index approaches.

International equity: A mix of growth stocks and value stocks with both developed and emerging market exposure, managed both actively and through passive index approaches.
Domestic and international equities such as common stocks, American depositary receipts, and real estate investment trusts that trade on public exchanges are classified as Level 1 investments and are valued at the closing price in the active market. Equity funds with unpublished prices are valued as Level 2 when the underlying holdings are comprised of Level 1 or Level 2 equity securities.
Fixed income: A mix of domestic and international bonds.
Investments in fixed income securities are generally classified as Level 2 investments and are valued based on prices reported in the market place. Additionally, the value of fixed income securities takes into consideration certain items such as broker quotes, spreads, yield curves, interest rates, and discount rates that apply to the term of a specific instrument.
Trust-owned life insurance (TOLI): Investments of taxable trusts aimed at minimizing the impact of taxes on the portfolio.
Investments in TOLI policies are classified as Level 2 investments and are valued based on the underlying investments held in the policy's separate accounts. The underlying assets are equity and fixed income pooled funds that are comprised of Level 1 and Level 2 securities.
Special situations: Investments in opportunistic strategies with the objective of diversifying and enhancing returns and exploiting short-term inefficiencies, as well as investments in promising new strategies of a longer-term nature.

Real estate: Investments in traditional private market, equity-oriented investments in real properties (indirectly through pooled funds or partnerships) and in publicly traded real estate securities.

Private equity: Investments in private partnerships that invest in private or public securities typically through privately-negotiated and/or structured transactions, including leveraged buyouts, venture capital, and distressed debt.
Investments in real estate, private equity, and special situations are generally classified as Net Asset Value as a Practical Expedient, since the underlying assets typically do not have publicly available observable inputs. The fund manager values the assets using various inputs and techniques depending on the nature of the underlying investments. Techniques may include purchase multiples for comparable transactions, comparable public company trading multiples, discounted cash flow analysis, prevailing market capitalization rates, recent sales of comparable investments, and independent third-party appraisals. The fair value of partnerships is determined by aggregating the value of the underlying assets less liabilities.

COMBINED NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)
Southern Company and Subsidiary Companies 2018 Annual Report

The fair values, and actual allocations relative to the target allocations, of the Southern Company system's pension plans at December 31, 2018 and 2017 are presented below. The fair values presented are prepared in accordance with GAAP. For purposes of determining the fair value of the pension plan and other postretirement benefit plan assets and the appropriate level designation, management relies on information provided by the plan's trustee. This information is reviewed and evaluated by management with changes made to the trustee information as appropriate. The registrants did not have any investments classified as Level 3 at December 31, 2018 or 2017.
These fair values exclude cash, receivables related to investment income and pending investment sales, and payables related to pending investment purchases.
 Fair Value Measurements Using   
 Quoted Prices in Active Markets for Identical Assets
Significant
Other
Observable
Inputs
Net Asset Value as a Practical Expedient Target AllocationActual Allocation
At December 31, 2018:(Level 1)(Level 2)(NAV)Total
 (in millions)  
Southern Company      
Assets:      
Domestic equity(*)
$2,102
$1,030
$
$3,132
26%28%
International equity(*)
1,344
1,325

2,669
25
25
Fixed income:    23
24
U.S. Treasury, government, and agency bonds
930

930


Mortgage- and asset-backed securities
7

7


Corporate bonds
1,195

1,195


Pooled funds
654

654


Cash equivalents and other270
2

272


Real estate investments419

1,361
1,780
14
15
Special situations

171
171
3
1
Private equity

821
821
9
7
Total$4,135
$5,143
$2,353
$11,631
100%100%
       
Alabama Power      
Assets:      
Domestic equity(*)
$466
$228
$
$694
26%28%
International equity(*)
298
293

591
25
25
Fixed income:    23
24
U.S. Treasury, government, and agency bonds
206

206
  
Mortgage- and asset-backed securities
2

2
  
Corporate bonds
265

265
  
Pooled funds
145

145
  
Cash equivalents and other60
1

61
  
Real estate investments93

302
395
14
15
Special situations

38
38
3
1
Private equity

182
182
9
7
Total$917
$1,140
$522
$2,579
100%100%
       

COMBINED NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)
Southern Company and Subsidiary Companies 2018 Annual Report

 Fair Value Measurements Using   
 Quoted Prices in Active Markets for Identical Assets
Significant
Other
Observable
Inputs
Net Asset Value as a Practical Expedient Target AllocationActual Allocation
At December 31, 2018:(Level 1)(Level 2)(NAV)Total
 (in millions)  
Georgia Power      
Assets:      
Domestic equity(*)
$663
$325
$
$988
26%28%
International equity(*)
424
418

842
25
25
Fixed income:    23
24
U.S. Treasury, government, and agency bonds
294

294
  
Mortgage- and asset-backed securities
2

2
  
Corporate bonds
377

377
  
Pooled funds
206

206
  
Cash equivalents and other85
1

86
  
Real estate investments132

429
561
14
15
Special situations

54
54
3
1
Private equity

259
259
9
7
Total$1,304
$1,623
$742
$3,669
100%100%
       
Mississippi Power      
Assets:      
Domestic equity(*)
$91
$45
$
$136
26%28%
International equity(*)
59
59

118
25
25
Fixed income:    23
24
U.S. Treasury, government, and agency bonds
40

40
  
Corporate bonds
52

52
  
Pooled funds
28

28
  
Cash equivalents and other12


12
  
Real estate investments18

59
77
14
15
Special situations

7
7
3
1
Private equity

36
36
9
7
Total$180
$224
$102
$506
100%100%
       

COMBINED NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)
Southern Company and Subsidiary Companies 2018 Annual Report

 Fair Value Measurements Using   
 Quoted Prices in Active Markets for Identical Assets
Significant
Other
Observable
Inputs
Net Asset Value as a Practical Expedient Target AllocationActual Allocation
At December 31, 2018:(Level 1)(Level 2)(NAV)Total
 (in millions)  
Southern Power      
Assets:      
Domestic equity(*)
$22
$11
$
$33
26%28%
International equity(*)
14
14

28
25
25
Fixed income:    23
24
U.S. Treasury, government, and agency bonds
10

10
  
Corporate bonds
13

13
  
Pooled funds
7

7
  
Cash equivalents and other3


3
  
Real estate investments4

15
19
14
15
Special situations

2
2
3
1
Private equity

9
9
9
7
Total$43
$55
$26
$124
100%100%
       
Southern Company Gas      
Assets:      
Domestic equity(*)
$145
$71
$
$216
26%28%
International equity(*)
92
91

183
25
25
Fixed income:    23
24
U.S. Treasury, government, and agency bonds
64

64



Corporate bonds
82

82



Pooled funds
45

45



Cash equivalents and other19


19



Real estate investments29

94
123
14
15
Special situations

12
12
3
1
Private equity

56
56
9
7
Total$285
$353
$162
$800
100%100%
(*)Level 1 securities consist of actively traded stocks while Level 2 securities consist of pooled funds.

COMBINED NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)
Southern Company and Subsidiary Companies 2018 Annual Report

 Fair Value Measurements Using   
 Quoted Prices in Active Markets for Identical Assets
Significant
Other
Observable
Inputs
Net Asset Value as a Practical Expedient Target AllocationActual Allocation
At December 31, 2017:(Level 1)(Level 2)(NAV)Total
 (in millions)  
Southern Company(a)
      
Assets:      
Domestic equity(b)
$2,559
$1,482
$
$4,041
26%31%
International equity(b)
1,555
1,569

3,124
25
25
Fixed income:    23
24
U.S. Treasury, government, and agency bonds
926

926


Mortgage- and asset-backed securities
8

8


Corporate bonds
1,241

1,241


Pooled funds
650

650


Cash equivalents and other301
36
48
385


Real estate investments472

1,204
1,676
14
13
Special situations

180
180
3
1
Private equity

670
670
9
6
Total$4,887
$5,912
$2,102
$12,901
100%100%
       
Alabama Power      
Assets:      
Domestic equity(b)
$572
$276
$
$848
26%31%
International equity(b)
370
333

703
25
25
Fixed income:    23
24
U.S. Treasury, government, and agency bonds
200

200
  
Mortgage- and asset-backed securities
2

2
  
Corporate bonds
286

286
  
Pooled funds
155

155
  
Cash equivalents and other51
3

54
  
Real estate investments111

283
394
14
13
Special situations

43
43
3
1
Private equity

159
159
9
6
Total$1,104
$1,255
$485
$2,844
100%100%
       

COMBINED NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)
Southern Company and Subsidiary Companies 2018 Annual Report

 Fair Value Measurements Using   
 Quoted Prices in Active Markets for Identical Assets
Significant
Other
Observable
Inputs
Net Asset Value as a Practical Expedient Target AllocationActual Allocation
At December 31, 2017:(Level 1)(Level 2)(NAV)Total
 (in millions)  
Georgia Power      
Assets:      
Domestic equity(b)
$819
$394
$
$1,213
26%31%
International equity(b)
529
477

1,006
25
25
Fixed income:    23
24
U.S. Treasury, government, and agency bonds
286

286

 
Mortgage- and asset-backed securities
3

3

 
Corporate bonds
409

409

 
Pooled funds
221

221

 
Cash equivalents and other74
4

78

 
Real estate investments160

404
564
14
13
Special situations

61
61
3
1
Private equity

228
228
9
6
Total$1,582
$1,794
$693
$4,069
100%100%
       
Mississippi Power      
Assets:      
Domestic equity(b)
$113
$55
$
$168
26%31%
International equity(b)
73
66

139
25
25
Fixed income:    23
24
U.S. Treasury, government, and agency bonds
40

40
  
Corporate bonds
56

56
  
Pooled funds
31

31
  
Cash equivalents and other10
1

11
  
Real estate investments22

56
78
14
13
Special situations

9
9
3
1
Private equity

32
32
9
6
Total$218
$249
$97
$564
100%100%
       

COMBINED NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)
Southern Company and Subsidiary Companies 2018 Annual Report

 Fair Value Measurements Using   
 Quoted Prices in Active Markets for Identical Assets
Significant
Other
Observable
Inputs
Net Asset Value as a Practical Expedient Target AllocationActual Allocation
At December 31, 2017:(Level 1)(Level 2)(NAV)Total
 (in millions)  
Southern Power      
Assets:      
Domestic equity(b)
$28
$13
$
$41
26%31%
International equity(b)
18
16

34
25
25
Fixed income:    23
24
U.S. Treasury, government, and agency bonds
10

10
  
Corporate bonds
14

14
  
Pooled funds
8

8
  
Cash equivalents and other2


2
  
Real estate investments5

14
19
14
13
Special situations

2
2
3
1
Private equity

8
8
9
6
Total$53
$61
$24
$138
100%100%
(a)Target and actual allocations reflect the asset allocations for only the Southern Company system pension plan prior to its merger with the Southern Company Gas pension plan on January 1, 2018.
(b)Level 1 securities consist of actively traded stocks while Level 2 securities consist of pooled funds.

COMBINED NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)
Southern Company and Subsidiary Companies 2018 Annual Report

The fair values of Southern Company Gas' pension plan assets for the period ended December 31, 2017 are presented below. The fair value measurements exclude cash, receivables related to investment income, pending investment sales, and payables related to pending investment purchases. Special situations (absolute return and hedge funds) investment assets are presented in the tables below based on the nature of the investment.
 Fair Value Measurements Using 
 Quoted Prices in Active Markets for Identical AssetsSignificant
Other
Observable
Inputs
Net Asset Value as a Practical Expedient 
At December 31, 2017:(Level 1)(Level 2)(NAV)Total
 (in millions)
Southern Company Gas    
Assets:    
Domestic equity(*)
$155
$323
$
$478
International equity(*)

166

166
Fixed income:



U.S. Treasury, government, and agency bonds
85

85
Corporate bonds
39

39
Cash equivalents and other84
25
48
157
Real estate investments3

16
19
Private equity

1
1
Total$242
$638
$65
$945
(*)Level 1 securities consist of actively traded stocks while Level 2 securities consist of pooled funds.
The composition of Southern Company Gas' pension plan assets at December 31, 2017, along with the targets, is presented below:
  Target 2017
Pension plan assets:    
Equity 53% 65%
Fixed Income 15
 19
Cash 2
 6
Other 30
 10
Balance at end of period 100% 100%

COMBINED NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)
Southern Company and Subsidiary Companies 2018 Annual Report

The fair values of the applicable registrants' other postretirement benefit plan assets at December 31, 2018 and 2017 are presented below. The registrants did not have any investments classified as Level 3 at December 31, 2018 or 2017. These fair value measurements exclude cash, receivables related to investment income, pending investment sales, and payables related to pending investment purchases.
 Fair Value Measurements Using   
 Quoted Prices in Active Markets for Identical Assets
Significant
Other
Observable
Inputs
Net Asset Value as a Practical ExpedientTotalTarget AllocationActual Allocation
At December 31, 2018:(Level 1)(Level 2)(NAV)
 (in millions)  
Southern Company      
Assets:      
Domestic equity(*)
$100
$76
$
$176
39%40%
International equity(*)
45
75

120
23
22
Fixed income:    29
30
U.S. Treasury, government, and agency bonds
34

34


Corporate bonds
35

35


Pooled funds
81

81


Cash equivalents and other13


13


Trust-owned life insurance
386

386


Real estate investments13

40
53
5
5
Special situations

4
4
1

Private equity

24
24
3
3
Total$171
$687
$68
$926
100%100%
       
Alabama Power      
Assets:      
Domestic equity(*)
$35
$10
$
$45
43%45%
International equity(*)
12
12

24
21
21
Fixed income:    28
28
U.S. Treasury, government, and agency bonds
10

10
  
Corporate bonds
11

11
  
Pooled funds
6

6
  
Cash equivalents and other3


3
  
Trust-owned life insurance
233

233
  
Real estate investments4

13
17
4
4
Special situations

2
2
1

Private equity

8
8
3
2
Total$54
$282
$23
$359
100%100%
       

COMBINED NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)
Southern Company and Subsidiary Companies 2018 Annual Report

 Fair Value Measurements Using   
 Quoted Prices in Active Markets for Identical Assets
Significant
Other
Observable
Inputs
Net Asset Value as a Practical ExpedientTotalTarget AllocationActual Allocation
At December 31, 2018:(Level 1)(Level 2)(NAV)
 (in millions)  
Georgia Power      
Assets:      
Domestic equity(*)
$41
$9
$
$50
36%35%
International equity(*)
17
32

49
24
24
Fixed income:    33
35
U.S. Treasury, government, and agency bonds
7

7
  
Corporate bonds
10

10
  
Pooled funds
44

44
  
Cash equivalents and other5


5
  
Trust-owned life insurance
153

153
  
Real estate investments4

11
15
4
4
Special situations

2
2
1

Private equity

7
7
2
2
Total$67
$255
$20
$342
100%100%
       
Mississippi Power      
Assets:      
Domestic equity(*)
$3
$2
$
$5
21%22%
International equity(*)
2
2

4
20
20
Fixed income:    38
39
U.S. Treasury, government, and agency bonds
6

6
  
Corporate bonds
2

2
  
Pooled funds
1

1
  
Cash equivalents and other1


1
  
Real estate investments1

2
3
11
12
Special situations



3
1
Private equity

1
1
7
6
Total$7
$13
$3
$23
100%100%
       

COMBINED NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)
Southern Company and Subsidiary Companies 2018 Annual Report

 Fair Value Measurements Using   
 Quoted Prices in Active Markets for Identical Assets
Significant
Other
Observable
Inputs
Net Asset Value as a Practical ExpedientTotalTarget AllocationActual Allocation
At December 31, 2018:(Level 1)(Level 2)(NAV)
 (in millions)  
Southern Company Gas      
Assets:      
Domestic equity(*)
$2
$47
$
$49
51%51%
International equity(*)
1
17

18
20
18
Fixed income:    25
28
U.S. Treasury, government, and agency bonds
1

1




Corporate bonds
1

1




Pooled funds
24

24




Cash equivalents and other1


1




Real estate investments

1
1
2
2
Special situations



1

Private equity

1
1
1
1
Total$4
$90
$2
$96
100%100%
(*)Level 1 securities consist of actively traded stocks while Level 2 securities consist of pooled funds.

COMBINED NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)
Southern Company and Subsidiary Companies 2018 Annual Report

 Fair Value Measurements Using   
 Quoted Prices in Active Markets for Identical Assets
Significant
Other
Observable
Inputs
Net Asset Value as a Practical Expedient Target AllocationActual Allocation
At December 31, 2017:(Level 1)(Level 2)(NAV)Total
 (in millions)  
Southern Company(a)
      
Assets:      
Domestic equity(b)
$135
$104
$
$239
37%40%
International equity(b)
47
98

145
23
23
Fixed income:    30
29
U.S. Treasury, government, and agency bonds
32

32


Corporate bonds
37

37


Pooled funds
79

79


Cash equivalents and other12

1
13


Trust-owned life insurance
426

426


Real estate investments16

36
52
5
5
Special situations

5
5
1
1
Private equity

20
20
4
2
Total$210
$776
$62
$1,048
100%100%
       
Alabama Power      
Assets:      
Domestic equity(b)
$52
$12
$
$64
42%44%
International equity(b)
16
14

30
22
22
Fixed income:    28
28
U.S. Treasury, government, and agency bonds
11

11
  
Corporate bonds
12

12
  
Pooled funds
7

7
  
Cash equivalents and other2


2
  
Trust-owned life insurance
253

253
  
Real estate investments5

12
17
4
4
Special situations

2
2
1

Private equity

7
7
3
2
Total$75
$309
$21
$405
100%100%
       

COMBINED NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)
Southern Company and Subsidiary Companies 2018 Annual Report

 Fair Value Measurements Using   
 Quoted Prices in Active Markets for Identical Assets
Significant
Other
Observable
Inputs
Net Asset Value as a Practical Expedient Target AllocationActual Allocation
At December 31, 2017:(Level 1)(Level 2)(NAV)Total
 (in millions)  
Georgia Power      
Assets:      
Domestic equity(b)
$53
$11
$
$64
36%38%
International equity(b)
14
46

60
24
24
Fixed income:    33
31
U.S. Treasury, government, and agency bonds
6

6
  
Corporate bonds
11

11
  
Pooled funds
41

41
  
Cash equivalents and other4


4
  
Trust-owned life insurance
173

173
  
Real estate investments6

11
17
4
4
Special situations

2
2
1
1
Private equity

6
6
2
2
Total$77
$288
$19
$384
100%100%
       
Mississippi Power      
Assets:      
Domestic equity(b)
$4
$2
$
$6
21%25%
International equity(b)
3
2

5
21
20
Fixed income:    37
38
U.S. Treasury, government, and agency bonds
5

5
  
Corporate bonds
2

2
  
Pooled funds
1

1
  
Cash equivalents and other1


1
  
Real estate investments1

2
3
12
11
Special situations



2
1
Private equity

1
1
7
5
Total$9
$12
$3
$24
100%100%
(a)Target and actual allocations reflect the asset allocations for only the Southern Company other postretirement benefit plans prior to the merger of the plans with the Southern Company Gas other postretirement benefit plans on January 1, 2018.
(b)Level 1 securities consist of actively traded stocks while Level 2 securities consist of pooled funds.

COMBINED NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)
Southern Company and Subsidiary Companies 2018 Annual Report

The fair values of Southern Company Gas' other postretirement benefit plan assets for the period ended December 31, 2017 are presented below. These fair value measurements exclude cash, receivables related to investment income, pending investment sales, and payables related to pending investment purchases. Special situations (absolute return and hedge funds) investment assets are presented in the tables below based on the nature of the investment.
 Fair Value Measurements Using 
 Quoted Prices in Active Markets for Identical AssetsSignificant
Other
Observable
Inputs
Net Asset Value as a Practical ExpedientTotal
At December 31, 2017:(Level 1)(Level 2)(NAV)
 (in millions)
Southern Company Gas    
Assets:    
Domestic equity(*)
$3
$69
$
$72
International equity(*)

22

22
Fixed income:    
Pooled funds
24

24
Cash equivalents and other2

1
3
Total$5
$115
$1
$121
(*)Level 1 securities consist of actively traded stocks while Level 2 securities consist of pooled funds.
The composition of Southern Company Gas' other postretirement benefit plan assets at December 31, 2017, along with the targets, is presented below:
  Target 2017
Other postretirement benefit plan assets:    
Equity 72% 76%
Fixed Income 24
 20
Cash 1
 2
Other 3
 2
Total 100% 100%
Employee Savings Plan
Southern Company and its subsidiaries also sponsor 401(k) defined contribution plans covering substantially all employees and provide matching contributions up to specified percentages of an employee's eligible pay. Total matching contributions made to the plans for 2018, 2017, and 2016 were as follows:
 Southern Company
Alabama
Power
Georgia
Power
Mississippi
Power
Southern
Power
 (in millions)
2018$119
$24
$26
$5
$3
2017118
23
26
5
N/A
2016105
23
27
5
N/A

COMBINED NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)
Southern Company and Subsidiary Companies 2018 Annual Report

 Southern Company Gas
 (in millions)
Successor – 2018$18
Successor – 201719
Successor – July 1, 2016 through December 31, 20168
Predecessor – January 1, 2016 through June 30, 201612
12. STOCK COMPENSATION
Successor
Stock-Based Compensation
Stock-based compensation primarily in the form of Southern Company performance share units (PSU) and restricted stock units (RSU) may be granted through the Omnibus Incentive Compensation Plan to certain levelsa large segment of Southern Company system employees ranging from line management withinto executives. Southern Company Gas and Southern Power had no employee participants in the Company. In 2017, stock-based compensation granted to employees includes performance share unitsplans until 2017 and restricted stock units.2018, respectively. In 2016, in conjunction with the Merger, stock-based compensation was granted to certain executives in the form of Southern Company restricted stockRSUs and performance share units. AsPSUs was granted to certain executives of Southern Company Gas through the Southern Company Omnibus Incentive Compensation Plan.
At December 31, 2017, there were 3272018, the number of current and former employees participating in the performance share unit and restricted stock unit programs.
Performance Share Units
Performance share units granted to employees vest at the end of a three-year performance period. All unvested performance share units vest immediately upon a change in control where Southern Company is not the surviving corporation. Shares of Southern Company common stock are delivered to employees at the end of the performance period with the number of shares issued ranging from 0% to 200% of the target number of performance share units granted, based on achievement of the performance goals established by the Compensation Committee of the Southern Company Board of Directors.
Southern Company issues performance share units with performance goals based on three performance goals to employees. These include performance share units with performance goals based on the total shareholder return (TSR) for Southern Company common stock during the three-year performance period as compared to a group of industry peers, performance share units with performance goals based on Southern Company's cumulative earnings per share (EPS) over the performance period, and performance share units with performance goals based on Southern Company's equity-weighted ROE over the performance period.
The total target grant date fair value of the stockstock-based compensation awards granted was comprised 20% each of EPS-based awards and ROE-based awards and 30% each of TSR-based awards and restricted stock units.
The fair value of TSR-based performance share unit awards is determined as of the grant date using a Monte Carlo simulation model to estimate the TSR of Southern Company's common stock among the industry peers over the performance period. Southern Company recognizes compensation expense on a straight-line basis over the three-year performance period without remeasurement.
The fair values of the EPS-based awards and the ROE-based awards are based on the closing stock price of Southern Company common stock on the date of the grant. Compensation expenseprograms for the EPS-based and ROE-based awards is generally recognized ratably over the three-year performance period initially assuming a 100% payout at the end of the performance period. Employeesregistrants was as follows:

NOTES (continued)
Southern Company Gas and Subsidiary Companies 2017 Annual Report


 Southern CompanyAlabama PowerGeorgia PowerMississippi PowerSouthern PowerSouthern Company Gas
Number of employees4,716
745
822
164
95
285
Employees become immediately vested in the TSR-based performance share units, along with the EPS-basedPSUs and ROE-based awards,RSUs upon retirement. As a result, compensation expense for employees that are retirement eligible at the grant date is recognized immediately, while compensation expense for employees that become retirement eligible during the vesting period is recognized over the period from grant date to the date of retirement eligibility. The expected payout related toIn addition, the EPS-based and ROE-based awards is reevaluated annually with expense recognized to date increased or decreased based on the number of shares currently expected to be issued. Unlike the TSR-based awards, the compensation expense ultimately recognized for the EPS-based awards and the ROE-based awards will be based on the actual number of shares issued at the end of the performance period.registrants recognize forfeitures as they occur.
For the year ended December 31, 2017, employees of the Company were granted 0.3 million performance share units. The weighted average grant-date fair value of TSR-based performance share units granted during 2017, determined using a Monte Carlo simulation model to estimate the TSR of Southern Company's stock among the industry peers over the performance period, was $49.27. The weighted average grant-date fair value of both EPS-based and ROE-based performance share units granted during 2017 was $49.22.
For the year ended December 31, 2017, total compensation cost for performance share units recognized in income was $8 million with the related tax benefit also recognized in income of $3 million. The compensation cost related to the grant of Southern Company performance share units to the Company's employees is recognized in the Company's financial statements with a corresponding credit to equity, representing a capital contribution from Southern Company. As of December 31, 2017, $6 million of total unrecognized compensation cost related to performance share award units will be recognized over a weighted-average period of approximately 21 months.
Restricted Stock Units
Stock-based compensation granted to employees included restricted stock units in addition to performance share units. One-third of the restricted stock units granted to employees vest each year throughout a three-year service period. All unvested restricted stock unitsPSUs and RSUs vest immediately upon a change in control where Southern Company is not the surviving corporation.
Performance Share Units
PSUs granted to employees vest at the end of a three-year performance period. Shares of Southern Company common stock are delivered to employees at the end of the vestingperformance period with the number of shares issued ranging from 0% to 200% of the target number of PSUs granted, based on achievement of the performance goals established by the Compensation Committee of the Southern Company Board of Directors.
Southern Company has issued three types of PSUs, each with a unique performance goal. These types of PSUs include total shareholder return (TSR) awards based on the TSR for Southern Company common stock during the three-year performance period as compared to a group of industry peers; ROE awards based on Southern Company's equity-weighted return over the performance period; and EPS awards based on Southern Company's cumulative EPS over the performance period. EPS awards were not granted in 2018.

COMBINED NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)
Southern Company and Subsidiary Companies 2018 Annual Report

The fair value of restrictedTSR awards is determined as of the grant date using a Monte Carlo simulation model to estimate the TSR of Southern Company's common stock unitsamong industry peers over the performance period. In determining the fair value of the TSR awards issued to employees, the expected volatility is based on the historical volatility of Southern Company's stock over a period equal to the performance period. The risk-free rate is based on the U.S. Treasury yield curve in effect at the time of grant that covers the performance period of the awards. The following table shows the assumptions used in the pricing model and the weighted average grant-date fair value of TSR awards granted:
Year Ended December 312018 2017 2016
Expected volatility14.9% 15.6% 15.0%
Expected term (in years)
3 3 3
Interest rate2.4% 1.4% 0.8%
Weighted average grant-date fair value$43.75 $49.08 $45.06
The registrants recognize TSR award compensation expense on a straight-line basis over the three-year performance period without remeasurement.
The fair values of EPS awards and ROE awards are based on the closing stock price of Southern Company common stock on the date of the grant. Since one-third of the restricted stock units vest each year throughout a three-year service period, compensation expense for restricted stock unit awards is generally recognized over the corresponding one-, two-, or three-year period. Employees become immediately vested in the restricted stock units upon retirement. As a result, compensation expense for employees that are retirement eligible at the grant date is recognized immediately while compensation expense for employees that become retirement eligible during the vesting period is recognized over the period from grant date to the date of retirement eligibility.
For the year ended December 31, 2017, employees of the Company were granted 0.1 million restricted stock units. The weighted average grant-date fair value of restricted stock unitsthe awards granted during 2018, 2017, and 2016 was $43.49, $49.21, and $48.87, respectively. Compensation expense for EPS and ROE awards is generally recognized ratably over the three-year performance period adjusted for expected changes in EPS and ROE performance. Total compensation cost recognized for vested EPS awards and ROE awards reflects final performance metrics.
Southern Company's total unvested PSUs outstanding at December 31, 2017 was $49.23.
For2.9 million. In February 2018, 1.5 million PSUs vested for the yearthree-year performance period ended December 31, 2017 totalwere converted into 1.9 million shares outstanding at a share price of $44.68.
During 2018, Southern Company granted 1.3 million PSUs and 1.9 million PSUs were vested or forfeited, resulting in 2.5 million unvested PSUs outstanding at December 31, 2018. In February 2019, the PSUs that vested for the three-year performance period ended December 31, 2018 were converted into 1.7 million shares outstanding at a share price of $49.24.

COMBINED NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)
Southern Company and Subsidiary Companies 2018 Annual Report

Total PSU compensation cost, for restricted stock units recognized in income was $4 million withand the related tax benefit also recognized in income, of $2 million. for the years ended December 31, 2018, 2017, and 2016 are as follows:
 2018 2017 2016
 (in millions)
Southern Company     
Compensation cost recognized in income$91
 $74
 $96
Tax benefit of compensation cost recognized in income24
 29
 37
Alabama Power     
Compensation cost recognized in income$11
 $9
 $15
Tax benefit of compensation cost recognized in income3
 4
 6
Georgia Power     
Compensation cost recognized in income$11
 $10
 $15
Tax benefit of compensation cost recognized in income3
 4
 6
Mississippi Power     
Compensation cost recognized in income$3
 $2
 $4
Tax benefit of compensation cost recognized in income1
 1
 1
Southern Power     
Compensation cost recognized in income$4
 N/A
 N/A
Tax benefit of compensation cost recognized in income1
 N/A
 N/A
Southern Company Gas     
Compensation cost recognized in income$11
 $8
 N/A
Tax benefit of compensation cost recognized in income3
 3
 N/A
The compensation cost related to the grant of Southern Company restricted stock unitsPSUs to the Company's employees of the traditional electric operating companies, Southern Power, and Southern Company Gas is recognized in the Company'seach respective registrant's financial statements with a corresponding credit to equity representing a capital contribution from Southern Company. As of
At December 31, 2017, $1 million of2018, Southern Company's total unrecognized compensation cost related to restricted stock units willPSUs was $30 million and is expected to be recognized over a weighted-average period of approximately 1316 months.
Merger Stock Compensation
At the effective time of the Merger, each share of Southern Company Gas common stock, other than certain excluded shares, was converted into the right to receive $66 in cash, without interest. Also at the effective time of the Merger:
Southern Company Gas' outstanding restricted stock units, restricted stock awards, and non-employee director stock awards were deemed fully vested and were canceled and converted into the right to receive an amount in cash equal to the product of (i) the total number of shares of Southern Company Gas' common stock subject to such award and (ii) the Merger consideration of $66 per share;
Southern Company Gas' outstanding stock options, all of which were fully vested, were canceled and converted into the right to receive an amount in cash equal to the product of (i) the total number of shares of Southern Company Gas' common stock subject to such options and (ii) the excess of the Merger consideration of $66 per share over the applicable exercise price per share of such options; and
each outstanding award of a performance share unit was converted into an award of Southern Company's restricted stock units (restricted stock awards).

NOTES (continued)
Southern Company Gas and Subsidiary Companies 2017 Annual Report


In conjunction with the Merger, stock-based compensation, in the form of Southern Company restricted stock and performance share units, was granted to certain executives of the Company through the Southern Company Omnibus Incentive Compensation Plan.
Southern Company Restricted Stock Awards
Under the terms of the restricted stock awards, the employees received a specified number of restricted stock units that vest when the employees have satisfied the requisite service period(s) at which time the employee receives Southern Company common stock. The terms of the award require the employee to be continuously employed through the original three-year vesting schedule of the award being replaced.
For the successor period ended December 31, 2016, employees of the Company were granted 0.7 million restricted stock units. The grant-date fair value of the restricted stock units granted was $53.83, based on the closing stock price of Southern Company common stock on the date of the grant. As a portion of the fair value of the award related to pre-combination service, the grant date fair value was allocated to pre- or post-combination service and accounted for as Merger consideration or compensation cost, respectively. Approximately $13 million of the grant date fair value was allocated to Merger consideration. The remaining fair value of $12 million is being recognized as compensation expense on a straight-line basis over the remaining vesting period.
The compensation cost related to the grant of restricted stock units to the Company's employees are recognized in the Company's financial statements with a corresponding credit to equity, representing a capital contribution from Southern Company. For the successor year ended December 31, 2017 and the successor period of July 1, 2016 through December 31, 2016, total compensation cost for restricted stock units recognized in income was $8 million and $13 million, respectively, with the related tax benefit also recognized in income of $4 million and $4 million, respectively. As of December 31, 2017, $3 million of total unrecognized compensation cost related to restricted stock units will be recognized over a weighted-average period of approximately 12 months. See "Performance Share Unit Awards" herein for additional information.
Change in Control Awards
Southern Company awarded performance share units to certain employees remaining with the Company in lieu of certain change in control benefits the employee was entitled to receive following the Merger (change-in-control awards). Shares of Southern Company common stock and/or cash equal to the dollar value of the change-in-control benefit will vest and be issued one-third each yearPSUs as long as the employee remains in service with the Company, or any of its affiliates, at each vest date. In addition to the change-in-control benefit, Southern Company common stock could be issued to the employees at the end of a performance period with the number of shares issued ranging from 0% to 100% of the target number of performance share units granted, based on achievement of certain Southern Company common stock price metrics, as well as performance goals established by the Compensation Committee of the Southern Company Board of Directors (achievement shares).
The change-in-control benefits are accounted for as a liability award with the fair value equal to the guaranteed dollar value of the change-in-control benefit. The grant-date fair value of the achievement portion of the award was determined using a Monte Carlo simulation model to estimate the number of achievement shares expected to vest based on the Southern Company common stock price. The expected payout is reevaluated annually with expense recognized to date increased or decreased proportionately based on the expected performance. The compensation expense ultimately recognized for the achievement shares will be based on the actual performance.
For the successor year ended December 31, 2017 and the successor period of July 1, 2016 through December 31, 2016, total compensation cost for the change-in-control awards recognized in income was $12 million and $4 million, respectively, with $6 million and less than $1 million, respectively, of related tax benefit recognized in income. The compensation cost related to the grant of Southern Company change-in-control benefit and achievement shares to the Company's employees are recognized in the Company's financial statements with a corresponding credit to a liability or equity, representing a capital contribution from Southern Company, respectively. As of December 31, 2017, $8 million of total unrecognized compensation cost related to change in control awards will be recognized over a weighted-average period of approximately 18 months.
Predecessor
For the predecessor periods of January 1, 2016 through June 30, 2016 and the year ended December 31, 2015, the employees of Southern Company Gas and subsidiaries participated in the AGL Resources Inc. Omnibus Performance Incentive Plan, as amended and restated.
The AGL Resources Inc. Omnibus Performance Incentive Plan, as amended and restated, and the Long-Term Incentive Plan (1999) provided2018 was immaterial for the grant of incentive and nonqualified stock options, stock appreciation rights, shares of restricted stock, restricted stock units, performance cash awards, andall other stock-based awards to officers and key employees. Effective July 1, 2016, all Southern Company Gas shares of stock were canceled and/or converted as a result of the Merger. No further grants willregistrants.

NOTES (continued)
Southern Company Gas and Subsidiary Companies 2017 Annual Report


be made from the Long-Term Incentive Plan (1999) or the AGL Resources Inc. Omnibus Performance Incentive Plan, as amended and restated.
For the predecessor periods, the Company recognized stock-based compensation expense for its stock-based awards over the requisite service period based on the estimated fair value at the date of grant for its stock-based awards using the modified prospective method. These stock awards included: stock options, stock and restricted stock awards, and performance units (restricted stock units, performance share units, and performance cash units).
Performance-based stock awards and performance units contained market and performance conditions. Stock options, restricted stock awards, and performance units also contained a service condition. The Company estimated forfeitures over the requisite service period when recognizing compensation expense. These estimates were adjusted to the extent that actual forfeitures differ, or were expected to materially differ, from such estimates. Excess tax benefits were reported as a financing cash inflow. The difference between the proceeds from the exercise of the Company's stock-based awards and the par value of the stock was recorded within additional paid-in capital.
Southern Company Gas granted stock awards with a grant price that was equal to the fair market value on the date of the grant. Fair market value was defined under the terms of the applicable plans as the closing price per share of Southern Company Gas' common stock on the grant date. For the predecessor periods of January 1, 2016 through June 30, 2016 and the year ended December 31, 2015, total compensation cost for cash and stock-based awards recognized in income was $24 million and $40 million, respectively, with related tax benefits also recognized in income, which were immaterial.
Incentive and Nonqualified Stock Options
The stock options that the Company granted prior to the Merger had a three-year vesting period and expired ten years after the date of grant. The exercise price for stock options granted equaled the stock price of Southern Company Gas common stock on the date of grant. Participants realized value from option grants only to the extent that the fair market value of the Company's common stock on the date of exercise of the option exceeded the fair market value of the common stock on the date of the grant. No stock options have been issued under the plan since 2009.
The Company measured compensation cost related to stock options based on the fair value of these awards at their date of grant using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model. For the predecessor year ended December 31, 2015, the Company had no unrecognized compensation costs related to stock options. For the predecessor period ended June 30, 2016 and the year ended December 31, 2015, cash received from stock option exercises and the related income tax benefits were immaterial.
For the predecessor periods of January 1, 2016 through June 30, 2016 and the year ended December 31, 2015, the total intrinsic value of options exercised was $3 million, and $13 million, respectively.
Effective July 1, 2016, all of the Company's outstanding stock options, all of which were fully vested, were canceled and converted into the right to receive an amount in cash equal to the product of (i) the total number of shares of Southern Company Gas' common stock subject to such options and (ii) the excess of the Merger consideration of $66 per share over the applicable exercise price per share of such options.
Restricted Stock Units
A restricted stock unit is an award that represents the opportunityBeginning in 2017, employees are granted RSUs in addition to receive a specified number of sharesPSUs. One-third of the Company'sRSUs granted to employees vest each year throughout a three-year service period. Shares of Southern Company common stock subjectare delivered to employees at the achievementend of certain pre-established performance criteria. each vesting period.
The fair value of RSUs is based on the closing stock price of Southern Company common stock on the date of the grant. The weighted average grant-date fair values of RSUs granted during 2018 and 2017 were $43.81 and $49.25, respectively. Since one-third of the RSUs vest each year throughout a three-year service period, compensation cost for RSUs is generally recognized over the corresponding one-, two-, or three-year vesting period.
Southern Company had 0.7 million RSUs outstanding at December 31, 2017. During 2018, Southern Company granted 0.7 million RSUs and 0.3 million RSUs were vested or forfeited, resulting in 1.1 million unvested RSUs outstanding at December 31, 2018, including RSUs related to employee retention agreements.
For the predecessor period of January 1, 2016 through June 30, 2016 and the yearyears ended December 31, 2018 and 2017, Southern Company's total compensation cost for RSUs recognized in income was $27 million and $25 million, respectively. The related tax benefit also recognized in income was $7 million and $10 million for the years ended December 31, 2018 and 2017, respectively. Total unrecognized compensation cost related to RSUs as of December 31, 2018 for Southern Company of $13 million will be recognized over a weighted-average period of approximately 16 months.

COMBINED NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)
Southern Company and Subsidiary Companies 2018 Annual Report

Total RSUs outstanding and total compensation cost and related tax benefit for the RSUs recognized in income for the years ended December 31, 2018 and 2017, as well as the total unrecognized compensation cost as of December 31, 2018, were immaterial for all other registrants.
Stock Options
In 2015, Southern Company discontinued granting stock options. Stock options expire no later than 10 years after the grant date and the latest possible exercise will occur no later than November 2024. As of December 31, 2018, the weighted average remaining contractual term for the options outstanding and exercisable was approximately 4 years.
As of December 31, 2017, all stock option awards are vested and compensation cost fully recognized. Total compensation cost for stock option awards and the related tax benefits recognized in income for the years ended December 31, 2017 and 2016 were immaterial for Southern Company, granted 25,166Alabama Power, Georgia Power, and 47,546, respectively,Mississippi Power.
Southern Company's activity in the stock option program for 2018 is summarized below:
 Shares Subject to Option Weighted Average Exercise Price
 (in millions)  
Outstanding at December 31, 201718.6
 $41.68
Exercised1.1
 37.82
Outstanding and Exercisable at December 31, 201817.5
 $41.92
Southern Company's cash receipts from issuances related to stock options exercised under the share-based payment arrangements for the years ended December 31, 2018, 2017, and 2016 were $41 million, $239 million, and $448 million, respectively.
At December 31, 2018, the aggregate intrinsic value for the options outstanding and exercisable was as follows:
 Southern CompanyAlabama PowerGeorgia PowerMississippi Power
 (in millions)
Total intrinsic value for outstanding and exercisable options$39
$5
$13
$1
Total intrinsic value of restricted stock units (including dividends)options exercised, and the related tax benefit, for the years ended December 31, 2018, 2017, and 2016 are presented below:
Year Ended December 312018 2017 2016
 (in millions)
Southern Company     
Intrinsic value of options exercised$9
 $64
 $120
Tax benefit of options exercised2
 25
 46
Alabama Power     
Intrinsic value of options exercised$2
 $12
 $21
Tax benefit of options exercised
 5
 8
Georgia Power     
Intrinsic value of options exercised$2
 $13
 $18
Tax benefit of options exercised
 5
 7
Mississippi Power     
Intrinsic value of options exercised$1
 $2
 $4
Tax benefit of options exercised
 1
 2

COMBINED NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)
Southern Company and Subsidiary Companies 2018 Annual Report

Merger Stock Compensation
At the effective time of the Merger, alleach share of Southern Company Gas common stock, other than certain excluded shares, was converted into the right to receive $66 in cash, without interest. Also, at the effective time of the Merger:
Southern Company Gas' outstanding RSUs, restricted stock units outstandingawards, and non-employee director stock awards were deemed fully vested and were canceled and converted into the right to receive an amount in cash equal to the product of (i) the total number of shares of Southern Company Gas' common stock subject to such award and (ii) the Merger consideration of $66 per share.
Performance Share Unit Awards
A performance share unit award represented the opportunity to receive cash and shares subject to the achievement of certain pre-established performance criteria. For the predecessor periods of January 1, 2016 through June 30, 2016 and the year ended December 31, 2015, the Company granted performance share unit awards to certain officers. The Company's 2016 and 2015 performance share units had two performance measures. One measure, which accounted for 75%, related to the Company's total shareholder return relative to a group of peer companies. The second measure, which accounted for 25%, related to the Company's earnings per share, excluding wholesale gas services, over the three-year performance period.

NOTES (continued)share;
Southern Company GasGas' outstanding stock options, all of which were fully vested, were canceled and Subsidiary Companies 2017 Annual Report


Atconverted into the effective timeright to receive an amount in cash equal to the product of (i) the total number of shares of Southern Company Gas' common stock subject to such options and (ii) the excess of the Merger consideration of $66 per share over the applicable exercise price per share of such options; and
each outstanding performance share unitaward of a Southern Company Gas PSU was converted into an award of Southern Company's restricted stock units.Company RSUs. The conversion ratio was the product of (i) the greater of (a) 125% of the number of units underlying such award based on target level achievement of all relevant performance goals and (b) the number of units underlying such award based on the actual level of achievement of all relevant performance goals against target and (ii) an exchange ratio based on the Merger consideration of $66 per share as compared to the volume-weighted average price per share of Southern Company common stock. The resulting
Southern Company restricted stock units will follow the vesting schedule and payment terms, and otherwise be issued on similar terms and conditions, as were applicable to such pre-Merger performance share unit awards, subject to certain exceptions. See "Southern Company Restricted Stock Awards" for additional information.
Stock and Restricted Stock Awards
The compensation cost of both stock awards and restricted stock awards was equal to the grant date fair value of the awards, recognized over the requisite service period. No other assumptions were used to value the awards. The Company referred to restricted stock as an award of Company common stock subject to time-based vesting or achievement of performance measures. Prior to vesting, restricted stock awards were subject to certain transfer restrictions and forfeiture upon termination of employment.
Restricted Stock AwardsEmployees
Total unvested restricted stock awards outstanding as of December 31, 2015 totaled 0.4 million. During 2016, 0.3 million restricted stock awards were granted, 0.7 million restricted stock awards were vested or forfeited. At the effective time of the Merger, each outstanding award of existing Southern Company Gas PSUs was converted into an award of Southern Company RSUs. Under the terms of the restricted stock awards, the employees received Southern Company stock when they satisfy the requisite service period by being continuously employed through the original three-year vesting schedule of the award being replaced. Southern Company issued 0.7 million RSUs with a grant-date fair value of $53.83, based on the closing stock price of Southern Company common stock on the date of the grant. As a portion of the fair value of the award related to pre-combination service, the grant date fair value was allocated to pre- or post-combination service and accounted for as Merger consideration or compensation cost, respectively. Approximately $13 million of the grant date fair value was allocated to Merger consideration. Southern Company Gas recognized the remaining fair value as compensation expense on a straight-line basis over the remaining vesting period. As of December 31, 2018, all RSUs are vested and compensation cost is fully recognized.
For the years ended December 31, 2018, 2017, and 2016, total compensation cost for RSUs recognized in income was $2 million, $8 million, and $13 million, respectively, with the related tax benefit of $1 million, $4 million, and $4 million, respectively, also recognized in income. The compensation cost related to the grant of RSUs to Southern Company Gas employees is recognized in Southern Company Gas' outstanding restricted stock awards were deemed fully vested and were canceled and converted intofinancial statements with a corresponding credit to equity, representing a capital contribution from Southern Company.
Southern Company Gas Change in Control Awards
Southern Company awarded PSUs to certain Southern Company Gas employees who continued their employment with the rightSouthern Company in lieu of certain change in control benefits the employee was entitled to receive an amountfollowing the Merger (change in control awards). Shares of Southern Company common stock and/or cash equal to the productdollar value of (i) the totalchange in control benefit will vest and be issued one-third each year as long as the employee remains in service with Southern Company or its subsidiaries at each vest date. In addition to the change in control benefit, Southern Company common stock could be issued to the employees at the end of a performance period based on achievement of certain Southern Company common stock price metrics, as well performance goals established by the Compensation Committee of the Southern Company Board of Directors (achievement shares).
The change in control benefits are accounted for as a liability award with the fair value equal to the guaranteed dollar value of the change in control benefit. The compensation cost of the change in control benefit is recognized in Southern Company Gas' financial statements with a corresponding credit to a liability. The grant-date fair value of the achievement portion of the award was determined using a Monte Carlo simulation model to estimate the number of achievement shares expected to vest based on the Southern Company common stock price. The compensation cost of the achievement shares is recognized in Southern Company Gas' financial statements with a corresponding credit to equity, representing a capital contribution from Southern Company. The expected payout is reevaluated annually with expense recognized to date increased or decreased proportionately based on the expected performance. The compensation cost ultimately recognized for the achievement shares will be based on the actual performance.

COMBINED NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)
Southern Company and Subsidiary Companies 2018 Annual Report

For the years ended December 31, 2018, 2017, and 2016, total compensation cost for the change in control awards recognized in income was $5 million, $12 million, and $4 million, respectively, with the related tax benefit of $2 million, $6 million, and less than $1 million, respectively, also recognized in income. As of December 31, 2018, $2 million of total unrecognized compensation cost related to change in control awards will be recognized over a weighted-average period of approximately six months.
Predecessor
For the predecessor period of January 1, 2016 through June 30, 2016, the employees of Southern Company Gas and subsidiaries participated in the AGL Resources Inc. Omnibus Performance Incentive Plan, as amended and restated.
The AGL Resources Inc. Omnibus Performance Incentive Plan, as amended and restated, and the Long-Term Incentive Plan (1999) provided for the grant of incentive and nonqualified stock options, stock appreciation rights, shares of restricted stock, RSUs, performance cash awards, and other stock-based awards to officers and key employees. Effective July 1, 2016, all Southern Company Gas shares of stock were canceled and/or converted as a result of the Merger. No further grants will be made from the Long-Term Incentive Plan (1999) or the AGL Resources Inc. Omnibus Performance Incentive Plan, as amended and restated.
For the predecessor period, Southern Company Gas recognized stock-based compensation cost for its stock-based awards over the requisite service period based on the estimated fair value at the date of grant for its stock-based awards using the modified prospective method.
Performance-based stock awards and performance units contained market and performance conditions. Stock options, restricted stock awards, and performance units also contained a service condition. Southern Company Gas estimated forfeitures over the requisite service period when recognizing compensation cost. These estimates were adjusted to the extent that actual forfeitures differ, or were expected to materially differ, from such estimates. The difference between the proceeds from the exercise of Southern Company Gas' stock-based awards and the par value of the stock was recorded within additional paid-in capital.
Southern Company Gas granted stock awards with a grant price that was equal to the fair market value on the date of the grant. Fair market value was defined under the terms of the applicable plans as the closing price per share of Southern Company Gas' common stock subject to such awardon the grant date. For the predecessor period of January 1, 2016 through June 30, 2016, total compensation cost for cash and (ii) the Merger considerationstock-based awards recognized in income was $24 million with related tax benefits of $66 per share.an immaterial amount also recognized in income.
9.13. FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTS
Fair value measurements are based on inputs of observable and unobservable market data that a market participant would use in pricing the asset or liability. The use of observable inputs is maximized where available and the use of unobservable inputs is minimized for fair value measurement and reflects a three-tier fair value hierarchy that prioritizes inputs to valuation techniques used for fair value measurement. See Note
Level 1 under "Fair Value Measurements"consists of observable market data in an active market for additional information onidentical assets or liabilities.
Level 2 consists of observable market data, other than that included in Level 1, that is either directly or indirectly observable.
Level 3 consists of unobservable market data. The input may reflect the assumptions of each registrant of what a market participant would use in pricing an asset or liability. If there is little available market data, then each registrant's own assumptions are the best available information.
In the case of multiple inputs being used in a fair value measurement, the lowest level input that is significant to the fair value hierarchy.measurement represents the level in the fair value hierarchy in which the fair value measurement is reported.
As

COMBINED NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)
Southern Company and Subsidiary Companies 2018 Annual Report

At December 31, 2017,2018, assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis during the period, together with their associated level of the fair value hierarchy, were as follows:
Fair Value Measurements Using  Fair Value Measurements Using  
As of December 31, 2017:Quoted Prices in Active Markets for Identical Assets
(Level 1)
 Significant Other Observable Inputs
(Level 2)
 Significant Unobservable Inputs
(Level 3)
 Net Asset Value as a Practical Expedient (NAV) Total
(in millions)Quoted Prices in Active Markets for Identical Assets  Significant Other Observable Inputs Significant Unobservable Inputs Net Asset Value as a Practical Expedient  
At December 31, 2018:(Level 1) (Level 2) (Level 3) (NAV) Total
(in millions)
Southern Company         
Assets:                  
Energy-related derivatives(a)(b)
$331
 $223
 $
 $
 $554
$469
 $292
 $
 $
 $761
Foreign currency derivatives
 75
 
 
 75
Investments in trusts:(c)(d)
         
Domestic equity601
 107
 
 
 708
Foreign equity53
 173
 
 
 226
U.S. Treasury and government agency securities
 261
 
 
 261
Municipal bonds
 83
 
 
 83
Pooled funds – fixed income
 14
 
 
 14
Corporate bonds24
 290
 
 
 314
Mortgage and asset backed securities
 68
 
 
 68
Private equity
 
 
 45
 45
Cash and cash equivalents16
 
 
 
 16
Other34
 4
 
 
 38
Cash equivalents765
 1
 
 
 766
Other investments
 12
 
 
 12
Total$1,962
 $1,380
 $
 $45
 $3,387
Liabilities:                  
Energy-related derivatives(a)(b)
$479
 $181
 $
 $
 $660
$648
 $316
 $
 $
 $964
Interest rate derivatives
 49
 
 
 49
Foreign currency derivatives
 23
 
 
 23
Contingent consideration
 
 21
 
 21
Total$648
 $388
 $21
 $
 $1,057
         

COMBINED NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)
Southern Company and Subsidiary Companies 2018 Annual Report

 Fair Value Measurements Using  
 Quoted Prices in Active Markets for Identical Assets  Significant Other Observable Inputs Significant Unobservable Inputs Net Asset Value as a Practical Expedient  
At December 31, 2018:(Level 1) (Level 2) (Level 3) (NAV) Total
 (in millions)
Alabama Power         
Assets:         
Energy-related derivatives$
 $6
 $
 $
 $6
Nuclear decommissioning trusts:(c)
         
Domestic equity396
 95
 
 
 491
Foreign equity53
 50
 
 
 103
U.S. Treasury and government agency securities
 18
 
 
 18
Municipal bonds
 1
 
 
 1
Corporate bonds24
 135
 
 
 159
Mortgage and asset backed securities
 23
 
 
 23
Private equity
 
 
 45
 45
Other6
 
 
 
 6
Cash equivalents116
 1
 
 
 117
Other investments
 12
 
 
 12
Total$595
 $341
 $
 $45
 $981
Liabilities:         
Energy-related derivatives$
 $10
 $
 $
 $10
          
Georgia Power         
Assets:         
Energy-related derivatives$
 $6
 $
 $
 $6
Nuclear decommissioning trusts:(c)(d)
         
Domestic equity205
 1
 
 
 206
Foreign equity
 119
 
 
 119
U.S. Treasury and government agency securities
 243
 
 
 243
Municipal bonds
 82
 
 
 82
Corporate bonds
 155
 
 
 155
Mortgage and asset backed securities
 45
 
 
 45
Other19
 4
 
 
 23
Total$224
 $655
 $
 $
 $879
Liabilities:
 
 
 
 
Energy-related derivatives$
 $21
 $
 $
 $21
Interest rate derivatives
 2
 
 
 2
Total$
 $23
 $
 $
 $23
          

COMBINED NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)
Southern Company and Subsidiary Companies 2018 Annual Report

 Fair Value Measurements Using  
 Quoted Prices in Active Markets for Identical Assets  Significant Other Observable Inputs Significant Unobservable Inputs Net Asset Value as a Practical Expedient  
At December 31, 2018:(Level 1) (Level 2) (Level 3) (NAV) Total
 (in millions)
Mississippi Power         
Assets:         
Energy-related derivatives$
 $3
 $
 $
 $3
Cash equivalents255
 
 
 
 255
Total$255
 $3
 $
 $
 $258
Liabilities:         
Energy-related derivatives$
 $9
 $
 $
 $9
          
Southern Power         
Assets:         
Energy-related derivatives$
 $4
 $
 $
 $4
Foreign currency derivatives
 75
 
 
 75
Cash equivalents46
 
 
 
 46
Total$46
 $79
 $
 $
 $125
Liabilities:         
Energy-related derivatives$
 $8
 $
 $
 $8
Foreign currency derivatives
 23
 
 
 23
Contingent consideration
 
 21
 
 21
Total$
 $31
 $21
 $
 $52
          
Southern Company Gas         
Assets:         
Energy-related derivatives(a)(b)
$469
 $272
 $
 $
 $741
Non-qualified deferred compensation trusts:         
Domestic equity
 11
 
 
 11
Foreign equity
 4
 
 
 4
Pooled funds - fixed income
 14
 
 
 14
Cash equivalents4
 
 
 
 4
Cash equivalents40
 
 
 
 40
Total$513
 $301
 $
 $
 $814
Liabilities:        

Energy-related derivatives(a)(b)
$648
 $261
 $
 $
 $909
(a)Energy-related derivatives exclude $8 million associated with premiums and certain weather derivatives accounted for based on intrinsic value rather than fair value.
(b)Energy-related derivatives exclude cash collateral of $277 million.
(c)
Excludes receivables related to investment income, pending investment sales, payables related to pending investment purchases, and currencies. See Note 6 under "Nuclear Decommissioning" for additional information.
(d)
Includes investment securities pledged to creditors and collateral received and excludes payables related to the securities lending program. See Note 6 under "Nuclear Decommissioning" for additional information.

COMBINED NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)
Southern Company and Subsidiary Companies 2018 Annual Report

At December 31, 2017, assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis during the period, together with their associated level of the fair value hierarchy, were as follows:
 Fair Value Measurements Using  
 Quoted Prices in Active Markets for Identical Assets Significant Other Observable Inputs Significant Unobservable Inputs Net Asset Value as a Practical Expedient  
At December 31, 2017:(Level 1) (Level 2) (Level 3) (NAV) Total
 (in millions)
Southern Company         
Assets:         
Energy-related derivatives(a)(b)
$331
 $239
 $
 $
 $570
Interest rate derivatives
 1
 
 
 1
Foreign currency derivatives
 129
 
 
 129
Nuclear decommissioning trusts:(c)
         
Domestic equity690
 82
 
 
 772
Foreign equity62
 224
 
 
 286
U.S. Treasury and government agency securities
 251
 
 
 251
Municipal bonds
 68
 
 
 68
Corporate bonds21
 315
 
 
 336
Mortgage and asset backed securities
 57
 
 
 57
Private equity
 
 
 29
 29
Other19
 12
 
 
 31
Cash equivalents1,455
 
 
 
 1,455
Other investments9
 
 1
 
 10
Total$2,587
 $1,378
 $1
 $29
 $3,995
Liabilities:         
Energy-related derivatives(a)(b)
$480
 $253
 $
 $
 $733
Interest rate derivatives
 38
 
 
 38
Foreign currency derivatives
 23
 
 
 23
Contingent consideration
 
 22
 
 22
Total$480
 $314
 $22
 $
 $816
          

COMBINED NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)
Southern Company and Subsidiary Companies 2018 Annual Report

 Fair Value Measurements Using  
 Quoted Prices in Active Markets for Identical Assets Significant Other Observable Inputs Significant Unobservable Inputs Net Asset Value as a Practical Expedient  
At December 31, 2017:(Level 1) (Level 2) (Level 3) (NAV) Total
 (in millions)
Alabama Power         
Assets:         
Energy-related derivatives$
 $4
 $
 $
 $4
Nuclear decommissioning trusts:(d)


 

 

   

Domestic equity442
 81
 
 
 523
Foreign equity62
 59
 
 
 121
U.S. Treasury and government agency securities
 24
 
 
 24
Corporate bonds21
 160
 
 
 181
Mortgage and asset backed securities
 18
 
 
 18
Private equity
 
 
 29
 29
Other6
 
 
 
 6
Cash equivalents349
 
 
 
 349
Total$880
 $346
 $
 $29
 $1,255
Liabilities:         
Energy-related derivatives$
 $10
 $
 $
 $10
          
Georgia Power         
Assets:         
Energy-related derivatives$
 $6
 $
 $
 $6
Nuclear decommissioning trusts:(d)(e)
         
Domestic equity248
 1
 
 
 249
Foreign equity
 166
 
 
 166
U.S. Treasury and government agency securities
 227
 
 
 227
Municipal bonds
 68
 
 
 68
Corporate bonds
 155
 
 
 155
Mortgage and asset backed securities
 40
 
 
 40
Other12
 12
 
 
 24
Cash equivalents690
 
 
 
 690
Total$950
 $675
 $
 $
 $1,625
Liabilities:         
Energy-related derivatives$
 $19
 $
 $
 $19
Interest rate derivatives
 5
 
 
 5
Total$
 $24
 $
 $
 $24
          

COMBINED NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)
Southern Company and Subsidiary Companies 2018 Annual Report

 Fair Value Measurements Using  
 Quoted Prices in Active Markets for Identical Assets Significant Other Observable Inputs Significant Unobservable Inputs Net Asset Value as a Practical Expedient  
At December 31, 2017:(Level 1) (Level 2) (Level 3) (NAV) Total
 (in millions)
Mississippi Power         
Assets:         
Energy-related derivatives$
 $2
 $
 $
 $2
Interest rate derivatives
 1
 
 
 1
Cash equivalents224
 
 
 
 224
Total$224
 $3
 $
 $
 $227
Liabilities:         
Energy-related derivatives$
 $9
 $
 $
 $9
          
Southern Power         
Assets:         
Energy-related derivatives$
 $3
 $
 $
 $3
Foreign currency derivatives
 129
 
 
 129
Cash equivalents21
 
 
 
 21
Total$21
 $132
 $
 $
 $153
Liabilities:         
Energy-related derivatives$
 $13
 $
 $
 $13
Foreign currency derivatives
 23
 
 
 23
Contingent consideration
 
 22
 
 22
Total$
 $36
 $22
 $
 $58
          
Southern Company Gas         
Assets:         
Energy-related derivatives(a)(b)
$331
 $223
 $
 $
 $554
Liabilities:         
Energy-related derivatives(a)(b)
$479
 $181
 $
 $
 660
(a)Energy-related derivatives exclude $11 million associated with premiums and certain weather derivatives accounted for based on intrinsic value rather than fair value.
(b)Energy-related derivatives excludesexclude cash collateral of $193 million.

NOTES (continued)
Southern Company Gas and Subsidiary Companies 2017 Annual Report


As of December 31, 2016, assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis during the period, together with their associated level of the fair value hierarchy, were as follows:
 Fair Value Measurements Using  
As of December 31, 2016:Quoted Prices in Active Markets for Identical Assets
(Level 1)
 Significant Other Observable Inputs
(Level 2)
 Significant Unobservable Inputs
(Level 3)
 Net Asset Value as a Practical Expedient (NAV) Total
 (in millions)
Assets:         
Energy-related derivatives(a)(b)
$338
 $239
 $
 $
 $577
Liabilities:         
Energy-related derivatives(a)(b)
$345
 $224
 $
 $
 $569
(a)(c)Energy-related derivatives excludes $4 million associated with certain weather derivatives accountedFor additional detail, see the nuclear decommissioning trusts sections for based on intrinsic value rather than fair value.Alabama Power and Georgia Power in this table.
(b)(d)Energy-related derivatives
Excludes receivables related to investment income, pending investment sales, payables related to pending investment purchases, and currencies. See Note 6 under "Nuclear Decommissioning" for additional information.
(e)
Includes investment securities pledged to creditors and collateral received and excludes cash collateral of $62 million.payables related to the securities lending program. See Note 6 under "Nuclear Decommissioning" for additional information.
Valuation Methodologies
The energy-related derivatives primarily consist of exchange-traded and over-the-counter financial products for natural gas and physical power products, including, from time to time, basis swaps. These are standard products used within the energy industry and are valued using the market approach. The inputs used are mainly from observable market sources, such as forward natural gas prices, power prices, implied volatility, and overnight index swap interest rates. Interest rate derivatives are also standard OTCover-the-counter products that are valued using observable market data and assumptions commonly used by market participants. The fair value of interest rate derivatives reflects the net present value of expected payments and receipts under the swap

COMBINED NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)
Southern Company and Subsidiary Companies 2018 Annual Report

agreement based on the market's expectation of future interest rates. Additional inputs to the net present value calculation may include the contract terms, counterparty credit risk, and occasionally, implied volatility of interest rate options. The fair value of cross-currency swaps reflects the net present value of expected payments and receipts under the swap agreement based on the market's expectation of future foreign currency exchange rates. Additional inputs to the net present value calculation may include the contract terms, counterparty credit risk, and discount rates. The interest rate derivatives and cross-currency swaps are categorized as Level 2 under Fair Value Measurements as these inputs are based on observable data and valuations of similar instruments. See Note 1014 for additional information on how these derivatives are used.
DebtFor fair value measurements of the investments within the nuclear decommissioning trusts and the non-qualified deferred compensation trusts, external pricing vendors are designated for each asset class with each security specifically assigned a primary pricing source. For investments held within commingled funds, fair value is determined at the end of each business day through the net asset value, which is established by obtaining the underlying securities' individual prices from the primary pricing source. A market price secured from the primary source vendor is then evaluated by management in its valuation of the assets within the trusts. As a general approach, fixed income market pricing vendors gather market data (including indices and market research reports) and integrate relative credit information, observed market movements, and sector news into proprietary pricing models, pricing systems, and mathematical tools. Dealer quotes and other market information, including live trading levels and pricing analysts' judgments, are also obtained when available.
The Company's long-term debtNRC requires licensees of commissioned nuclear power reactors to establish a plan for providing reasonable assurance of funds for future decommissioning. See Note 6 under "Nuclear Decommissioning" for additional information.
Southern Power has contingent payment obligations related to certain acquisitions whereby Southern Power is recordedprimarily obligated to make generation-based payments to the seller, which commenced at amortized cost, includingthe commercial operation of the respective facility and continue through 2026. The obligation is categorized as Level 3 under Fair Value Measurements as the fair value adjustments atis determined using significant unobservable inputs for the effective date of the Merger.forecasted facility generation in MW-hours, as well as other inputs such as a fixed dollar amount per MW-hour, and a discount rate. The Company amortizes the fair value adjustments overof contingent consideration reflects the livesnet present value of expected payments and any periodic change arising from forecasted generation is expected to be immaterial.
"Other investments" include investments categorized as Level 3 under Fair Value Measurements that are not traded in the respective bonds.open market. The following table presentsfair value of these investments has been determined based on market factors including comparable multiples and the expectations regarding cash flows and business plan executions.
The fair value measurements of private equity investments held in Alabama Power's nuclear decommissioning trusts that are calculated at net asset value per share (or its equivalent) as a practical expedient totaled $45 million and $29 million at December 31, 2018 and 2017, respectively. Unfunded commitments related to the private equity investments totaled $50 million and $21 million at December 31, 2018 and 2017, respectively. Private equity funds include funds-of-funds that invest in high-quality private equity funds across several market sectors, funds that invest in real estate assets, and a fund that acquires companies to create resale value. Private equity funds do not have redemption rights. Distributions from these funds will be received as the underlying investments in the funds are liquidated.

COMBINED NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)
Southern Company and Subsidiary Companies 2018 Annual Report

At December 31, 2018 and 2017, other financial instruments for which the carrying amount anddid not equal fair value of the Company's long-term debtwere as of December 31:follows:
 Carrying Amount Fair Value
 (in millions)
Long-term debt, including securities due within one year:   
2017$6,048
 $6,471
2016$5,281
 $5,491
 
Southern
  Company(a)(b)
Alabama PowerGeorgia PowerMississippi PowerSouthern Power
Southern Company Gas(b)
 (in millions)
At December 31, 2018:      
Long-term debt, including securities due within one year:      
Carrying amount$45,023
$8,120
$9,838
$1,579
$5,017
$5,940
Fair value44,824
8,370
9,800
1,546
4,980
5,965
At December 31, 2017:      
Long-term debt, including securities due within one year:      
Carrying amount$48,151
$7,625
$11,777
$2,086
$5,841
$6,048
Fair value51,348
8,305
12,531
2,076
6,079
6,471
(a)
Includes long-term debt of Gulf Power, which is classified as liabilities held for sale on Southern Company's balance sheet at December 31, 2018. See Note 15 under "Southern Company's Sale of Gulf Power" and "Assets Held for Sale" for additional information.
(b)The long-term debt of Southern Company Gas is recorded at amortized cost, including the fair value adjustments at the effective date of the Merger. Southern Company Gas amortizes the fair value adjustments over the lives of the respective bonds.
The fair values are determined using Level 2 measurements and are based on quoted market prices for the same or similar issues or on the current rates available to the Company.registrants.
10.14. DERIVATIVES
TheSouthern Company, isthe traditional electric operating companies, Southern Power, and Southern Company Gas are exposed to market risks, primarilyincluding commodity price risk, interest rate risk, weather risk, and weatheroccasionally foreign currency exchange rate risk. To manage the volatility attributable to these exposures, the Companyeach company nets its exposures, where possible, to take advantage of natural offsets and enters into various derivative transactions for the remaining exposures pursuant to the Company'seach company's policies in areas such as counterparty exposure and risk management practices. WholesaleSouthern Company Gas' wholesale gas operations use various contracts in its commercial activities that generally meet the definition of derivatives. For the traditional electric operating companies, Southern Power, and Southern Company Gas' other businesses, the Company'seach company's policy is that derivatives are to be used primarily for hedging purposes. In both cases, the Companypurposes and mandates strict adherence to all applicable risk management policies. Derivative positions are monitored using techniques including, but not limited to, market valuation, value at risk, stress testing, and sensitivity analysis. Derivative instruments are recognized at fair value in the balance sheets as either assets or liabilities and are presented on a net basis. See Note 913 for additional fair value information. In the statements of cash flows, theany cash impacts of settled energy-related and interest rate derivatives are recorded as operating activities. Any cash impacts of settled foreign currency derivatives are classified as operating or financing activities to correspond with classification of the hedged interest or principal, respectively. See Note 1 under "Financial Instruments" for additional information.
The registrants adopted ASU 2017-12 as of January 1, 2018. See Note 1 under "Recently Adopted Accounting StandardsOther" for additional information.
Energy-Related Derivatives
The traditional electric operating companies, Southern Power, and Southern Company entersGas enter into energy-related derivatives to hedge exposures to electricity, natural gas, and other fuel price changes. However, due to cost-based rate regulations and other various cost recovery mechanisms, the traditional electric operating companies and the natural gas distribution operations hasutilities have limited exposure to market volatility in pricesenergy-related commodity prices. Each of the traditional electric operating companies and certain of the natural gas. Thegas distribution utilities of Southern Company managesGas manage fuel-hedging programs, implemented per the guidelines of their respective state PSCs or other applicable state regulatory agencies, through the natural gasuse of financial derivative contracts, which are expected to continue to mitigate price volatility. The traditional electric operating companies (with respect to wholesale generating capacity) and Southern Power have limited exposure to market volatility in energy-related commodity prices because their long-term sales contracts shift substantially all fuel cost responsibility to the purchaser. However, the traditional electric operating companies and Southern Power may be exposed to market volatility in energy-related commodity
    Table of Contents                                Index to Financial Statements

COMBINED NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)
Southern Company Gas and Subsidiary Companies 20172018 Annual Report


distribution utilities' respective state regulatory agencies, throughprices to the use of financial derivative contracts, whichextent any uncontracted capacity is expectedused to continue to mitigate price volatility. However, thesell electricity. Southern Company Gas retains exposure to price changes that can, in a volatile energy market, be extremely material and can adversely affect the Company.its results of operations.
TheSouthern Company Gas also enters into weather derivative contracts as economic hedges of adjusted operating margins in the event of warmer-than-normal weather. Exchange-traded options are carried at fair value, with changes reflected in operating revenues. Non-exchange-traded options are accounted for using the intrinsic value method. Changes in the intrinsic value for non-exchange-traded contracts are reflected in the statements of income.operating revenues.
Energy-related derivative contracts are accounted for under one of three methods:
Regulatory Hedges Energy-related derivative contracts which are designated as regulatory hedges relate primarily to the traditional electric operating companies' and the natural gas distribution utilities' fuel-hedging programs, where gains and losses are initially recorded as regulatory liabilities and assets, respectively, and then are included in the cost of natural gasfuel expense as the underlying natural gasfuel is used in operations and ultimately recovered through the respective fuel cost recovery clauses.
Cash Flow Hedges Gains and losses on energy-related derivatives designated as cash flow hedges (which are mainly used to hedge anticipated purchases and sales) are initially deferred in other OCIAOCI before being recognized in the statements of income in the same period and in the same income statement line item as the earnings effect of the hedged transactions are reflected in earnings.transactions.
Not Designated Gains and losses on energy-related derivative contracts that are not designated or fail to qualify as hedges are recognized in the statements of income in the period of change.as incurred.
Some energy-related derivative contracts require physical delivery as opposed to financial settlement, and this type of derivative is both common and prevalent within the electric and natural gas industry.industries. When an energy-related derivative contract is settled physically, any cumulative unrealized gain or loss is reversed and the contract price is recognized in the respective line item representing the actual price of the underlying goods being delivered.
At December 31, 2017,2018, the net volume of energy-related derivative contracts for natural gas positions, totaled 300 million mmBtu for the Company, together with the longest hedge date of 2020 over which the Companyrespective entity is hedging its exposure to the variability in future cash flows for forecasted transactions and the longest non-hedge date of 2026 for derivatives not designated as hedges.hedges, were as follows:
 
Net
Purchased
mmBtu
 
Longest
Hedge
Date
 
Longest
Non-Hedge
Date
 (in millions)    
Southern Company(*)
431 2022 2029
Alabama Power74 2022 
Georgia Power153 2022 
Mississippi Power63 2022 
Southern Power15 2020 
Southern Company Gas(*)
120 2021 2029
(*)Southern Company Gas' derivative instruments include both long and short natural gas positions. A long position is a contract to purchase natural gas and a short position is a contract to sell natural gas. Southern Company Gas' volume represents the net of long natural gas positions of 4,159 million mmBtu and short natural gas positions of 4,039 million mmBtu at December 31, 2018, which is also included in Southern Company's total volume.
At December 31, 2018, the net volume of Southern Power's energy-related derivative contracts for power to be sold was 2 million MWHs, all of which expire by 2020.
In addition to the volumes discussed above, the traditional electric operating companies and Southern Power enter into physical natural gas supply contracts that provide the option to sell back excess natural gas due to operational constraints. The maximum expected volume of natural gas subject to such a feature is 23 million mmBtu for Southern Company, which includes 4 million mmBtu for Alabama Power, 7 million mmBtu for Georgia Power, 3 million mmBtu for Mississippi Power, and 7 million mmBtu for Southern Power.
For cash flow hedges of energy-related derivatives, the estimated pre-tax losses that willgains (losses) expected to be reclassified from accumulated OCIAOCI to earnings for the 12-month periodyear ending December 31, 20182019 are $4 million.immaterial for all registrants.
Interest Rate Derivatives
TheSouthern Company and certain subsidiaries may also enter into interest rate derivatives to hedge exposure to changes in interest rates. The derivatives employed as hedging instruments are structured to minimize ineffectiveness. Derivatives related to existing

COMBINED NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)
Southern Company and Subsidiary Companies 2018 Annual Report

variable rate securities or forecasted transactions are accounted for as cash flow hedges where the effective portion of the derivatives' fair value gains or losses isare recorded in OCI and isare reclassified into earnings at the same time and presented on the same income statement line item as the earnings effect of the hedged transactions affect earnings, with any ineffectiveness recorded directly to earnings.transactions. Derivatives related to existing fixed rate securities are accounted for as fair value hedges, where the derivatives' fair value gains or losses and hedged items' fair value gains or losses are both recorded directly to earnings providing an offset, with any difference representing ineffectiveness.on the same income statement line item. Fair value gains or losses on derivatives that are not designated or fail to qualify as hedges are recognized in the statements of income as incurred.
In 2015,At December 31, 2018, the Company executed $800 million in notional value of 10-year and 30-year fixed-rate forward-startingfollowing interest rate swapsderivatives were outstanding:

Notional
Amount

Interest
Rate
Received

Weighted Average Interest
Rate Paid

Hedge
Maturity
Date

Fair Value
Gain (Loss) December 31, 2018

(in millions)






(in millions)
Fair Value Hedges of Existing Debt







Southern Company(*)
$300
 2.75% 3-month LIBOR + 0.92% June 2020 $(4)
Southern Company(*)
1,500
 2.35% 1-month LIBOR + 0.87% July 2021 (43)
Georgia Power200
 4.25% 3-month LIBOR + 2.46% December 2019 (2)
Southern Company Consolidated$2,000
       $(49)
(*)Represents the Southern Company parent entity.
The estimated pre-tax gains (losses) related to interest rate derivatives expected to be reclassified from AOCI to interest expense for the year ending December 31, 2019 are $(19) million for Southern Company and immaterial for all other registrants. Deferred gains and losses related to interest rate derivatives are expected to be amortized into earnings through 2046 for the Southern Company parent entity, 2035 for Alabama Power, 2037 for Georgia Power, 2028 for Mississippi Power, and 2046 for Southern Company Gas.
Foreign Currency Derivatives
Southern Company and certain subsidiaries, including Southern Power, may enter into foreign currency derivatives to hedge potential interest rate volatility designatedexposure to changes in foreign currency exchange rates, such as that arising from the issuance of debt denominated in a currency other than U.S. dollars. Derivatives related to forecasted transactions are accounted for as cash flow hedges where the derivatives' fair value gains or losses are recorded in OCI and are reclassified into earnings at the same time and on the same income statement line as the earnings effect of issuances of long-term debtthe hedged transactions, including foreign currency gains or losses arising from changes in the fourth quarter 2015U.S. currency exchange rates. The derivatives employed as hedging instruments are structured to minimize ineffectiveness.
At December 31, 2018, the following foreign currency derivatives were outstanding:
 Pay NotionalPay RateReceive NotionalReceive RateHedge
Maturity Date
Fair Value
Gain (Loss) at December 31, 2018
 (in millions) (in millions)  (in millions)
Cash Flow Hedges of Existing Debt     
Southern Power$677
2.95%600
1.00%June 2022$25
Southern Power564
3.78%500
1.85%June 202627
Total$1,241
 1,100
  $52
The estimated pre-tax gains (losses) related to Southern Power's foreign currency derivatives that will be reclassified from AOCI to earnings for the year ending December 31, 2019 are $(23) million.

COMBINED NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)
Southern Company and during 2016. The Company settled $200 million of these interest rate swaps in 2015 for an immaterial loss, $400 million in May 2016 at a loss of $26 million, and the remaining $200 million in September 2016 at a loss of $35 million. Due to the application of acquisition accounting, only $5 million of the pre-tax loss incurred and deferred in the successor period is being amortized to interest expense through 2046.Subsidiary Companies 2018 Annual Report

Derivative Financial Statement Presentation and Amounts
TheSouthern Company, the traditional electric operating companies, Southern Power, and Southern Company Gas enter into derivative contracts of the Company are subject to master netting arrangements or similar agreements and are reported net in the financial statements. Some of these energy-related and interest rate derivative contractsthat may contain certain provisions that permit intra-contract netting of derivative receivables and payables for routine billing and offsets related to events of default and settlements. Southern Company and certain subsidiaries also utilize master netting agreements to mitigate exposure to counterparty credit risk. These agreements may contain provisions that permit netting across product lines and against cash collateral. The fair value amounts of derivative assets and liabilities on the balance sheets are presented net to the extent that there are netting arrangements or similar agreements with the counterparties.
At December 31, 2018 and 2017, the fair value of energy-related derivatives, interest rate derivatives, and foreign currency derivatives was reflected in the balance sheets as follows:
 20182017
Derivative Category and Balance Sheet LocationAssetsLiabilitiesAssetsLiabilities
 (in millions)
Southern Company    
Derivatives designated as hedging instruments for regulatory purposes    
Energy-related derivatives:    
Other current assets/Other current liabilities$8
$23
$10
$43
Other deferred charges and assets/Other deferred credits and liabilities9
26
7
24
Assets held for sale, current/Liabilities held for sale, current
6


Total derivatives designated as hedging instruments for regulatory purposes$17
$55
$17
$67
Derivatives designated as hedging instruments in cash flow and fair value hedges    
Energy-related derivatives:    
Other current assets/Other current liabilities$3
$7
$3
$14
Other deferred charges and assets/Other deferred credits and liabilities1
2


Interest rate derivatives:    
Other current assets/Other current liabilities
19
1
4
Other deferred charges and assets/Other deferred credits and liabilities
30

34
Foreign currency derivatives:    
Other current assets/Other current liabilities
23

23
Other deferred charges and assets/Other deferred credits and liabilities75

129

Total derivatives designated as hedging instruments in cash flow and fair value hedges$79
$81
$133
$75
Derivatives not designated as hedging instruments    
Energy-related derivatives:    
Other current assets/Other current liabilities$561
$575
$380
$437
Other deferred charges and assets/Other deferred credits and liabilities180
325
170
215
Total derivatives not designated as hedging instruments$741
$900
$550
$652
Gross amounts recognized$837
$1,036
$700
$794
Gross amounts offset(a)
$(524)$(801)$(405)$(598)
Net amounts recognized in the Balance Sheets(b)
$313
$235
$295
$196
     
    Table of Contents                                Index to Financial Statements

COMBINED NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)
Southern Company Gas and Subsidiary Companies 20172018 Annual Report


At December 31, 2017
 20182017
Derivative Category and Balance Sheet LocationAssetsLiabilitiesAssetsLiabilities
 (in millions)
Alabama Power    
Derivatives designated as hedging instruments for regulatory purposes    
Energy-related derivatives:    
Other current assets/Other current liabilities$3
$4
$2
$6
Other deferred charges and assets/Other deferred credits and liabilities3
6
2
4
Total derivatives designated as hedging instruments for regulatory purposes$6
$10
$4
$10
Gross amounts recognized$6
$10
$4
$10
Gross amounts offset$(4)$(4)$(4)$(4)
Net amounts recognized in the Balance Sheets$2
$6
$
$6
     
Georgia Power    
Derivatives designated as hedging instruments for regulatory purposes    
Energy-related derivatives:    
Other current assets/Other current liabilities$2
$8
$2
$9
Other deferred charges and assets/Other deferred credits and liabilities4
13
4
10
Total derivatives designated as hedging instruments for regulatory purposes$6
$21
$6
$19
Derivatives designated as hedging instruments in cash flow and fair value hedges



  
Interest rate derivatives:



  
Other current assets/Other current liabilities$
$2
$
$4
Other deferred charges and assets/Other deferred credits and liabilities


1
Total derivatives designated as hedging instruments in cash flow and fair value hedges$
$2
$
$5
Gross amounts recognized$6
$23
$6
$24
Gross amounts offset$(6)$(6)$(6)$(6)
Net amounts recognized in the Balance Sheets$
$17
$
$18
     

COMBINED NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)
Southern Company and 2016, the fair value of energy-related derivatives and interest rate derivatives was reflected in the balance sheets as follows:Subsidiary Companies 2018 Annual Report

2017201620182017
Derivative Category and Balance Sheet LocationAssetsLiabilitiesAssetsLiabilitiesAssetsLiabilitiesAssetsLiabilities
(in millions)(in millions)
Mississippi Power 
Derivatives designated as hedging instruments for regulatory purposes  
Energy-related derivatives:  
Assets from risk management activities/Liabilities from risk management activities-current$5
$8
$24
$3
Other current assets/Other current liabilities$1
$3
$1
$6
Other deferred charges and assets/Other deferred credits and liabilities

1

2
6
1
3
Total derivatives designated as hedging instruments for regulatory purposes$5
$8
$25
$3
$3
$9
$2
$9
Gross amounts recognized$3
$9
$3
$9
Gross amounts offset$(2)$(2)$(2)$(2)
Net amounts recognized in the Balance Sheets$1
$7
$1
$7
 
Southern Power 
Derivatives designated as hedging instruments in cash flow and fair value hedges  
Energy-related derivatives:  
Assets from risk management activities/Liabilities from risk management activities-current$
$3
$4
$3
Other current assets/Other current liabilities$3
$6
$3
$11
Other deferred charges and assets/Other deferred credits and liabilities1
2


Foreign currency derivatives: 
Other current assets/Other current liabilities
23

23
Other deferred charges and assets/Other deferred credits and liabilities75

129

Total derivatives designated as hedging instruments in cash flow and fair value hedges$79
$31
$132
$34
Derivatives not designated as hedging instruments  
Energy-related derivatives:  
Assets from risk management activities/Liabilities from risk management activities-current$379
$434
$486
$482
Other deferred charges and assets/Other deferred credits and liabilities170
215
66
81
Other current assets/Other current liabilities$
$
$
$2
Total derivatives not designated as hedging instruments$549
$649
$552
$563
$
$
$
$2
Gross amounts recognized$554
$660
$581
$569
$79
$31
$132
$36
Gross amounts offset(a)
$(390)$(583)$(435)$(497)
Net amounts recognized in the Balance Sheets (b)
$164
$77
$146
$72
Gross amounts offset$(3)$(3)$(3)$(3)
Net amounts recognized in the Balance Sheets$76
$28
$129
$33
 

COMBINED NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)
Southern Company and Subsidiary Companies 2018 Annual Report

 20182017
Derivative Category and Balance Sheet LocationAssetsLiabilitiesAssetsLiabilities
 (in millions)
Southern Company Gas    
Derivatives designated as hedging instruments for regulatory purposes    
Energy-related derivatives:    
Assets from risk management activities/Liabilities from risk management activities-current$2
$8
$5
$8
Other deferred charges and assets/Other deferred credits and liabilities
1


Total derivatives designated as hedging instruments for regulatory purposes$2
$9
$5
$8
Derivatives designated as hedging instruments in cash flow and fair value hedges    
Energy-related derivatives:    
Assets from risk management activities/Liabilities from risk management activities-current$
$1
$
$3
Total derivatives designated as hedging instruments in cash flow and fair value hedges$
$1
$
$3
Derivatives not designated as hedging instruments    
Energy-related derivatives:    
Assets from risk management activities/Liabilities from risk management activities-current$559
$574
$379
$434
Other deferred charges and assets/Other deferred credits and liabilities180
325
170
215
Total derivatives not designated as hedging instruments$739
$899
$549
$649
Gross amounts recognized$741
$909
$554
$660
Gross amounts offset(a)
$(508)$(785)$(390)$(583)
Net amounts recognized in the Balance Sheets (b)
$233
$124
$164
$77
(a)Gross amounts offset include cash collateral held on deposit in broker margin accounts of $277 million and $193 million and $62 million as ofat December 31, 20172018 and 2016,2017, respectively.
(b)Net amountamounts of derivative instruments outstanding excludes premiumsexclude premium and intrinsic value associated with weather derivatives of $8 million and $11 million as ofat December 31, 2017.2018 and 2017, respectively.
Energy-related derivatives not designated as hedging instruments were immaterial for Alabama Power, Georgia Power, Mississippi Power, and Southern Power at December 31, 2018 and 2017.

COMBINED NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)
Southern Company and Subsidiary Companies 2018 Annual Report

At December 31, 20172018 and 2016,2017, the pre-tax effecteffects of unrealized derivative gains (losses) arising from energy-related derivativesderivative instruments designated as regulatory hedging instruments and deferred were as follows:
  Unrealized Losses Unrealized Gains
Derivative CategoryBalance Sheet Location20172016Balance Sheet Location20172016
  (in millions) (in millions)
Energy-related derivatives:     
 Other regulatory assets, current$(4)$(1)Other regulatory liabilities, current$7
$17
 Other regulatory assets, deferred

Other regulatory liabilities, deferred
1
Total energy-related derivative gains (losses)(*)
$(4)$(1) $7
$18
Regulatory Hedge Unrealized Gain (Loss) Recognized in the Balance Sheet at December 31, 2018
Derivative Category and Balance Sheet
Location
Southern
Company
Alabama
Power
Georgia
Power
Mississippi
Power
Southern Company Gas
 (in millions)
Energy-related derivatives:     
Other regulatory assets, current$(19)$(3)$(6)$(2)$(8)
Other regulatory assets, deferred(16)(3)(9)(4)
Assets held for sale, current(6)



Other regulatory liabilities, current1



1
Total energy-related derivative gains (losses)$(40)$(6)$(15)$(6)$(7)
(*) Fair value gains and losses included
Regulatory Hedge Unrealized Gain (Loss) Recognized in the Balance Sheet at December 31, 2017
Derivative Category and Balance Sheet
Location
Southern
Company(*)
Alabama
Power
Georgia
Power
Mississippi
Power
Southern Company Gas(*)
 (in millions) 
Energy-related derivatives:     
Other regulatory assets, current$(34)$(4)$(7)$(5)$(4)
Other regulatory assets, deferred(18)(3)(6)(2)
Other regulatory liabilities, current7
1


7
Other regulatory liabilities, deferred1




Total energy-related derivative gains (losses)$(44)$(6)$(13)$(7)$3
(*)Fair value gains and losses recorded in regulatory assets and liabilities include cash collateral held on deposit in broker margin accounts of $6 million as of $6 million at December 31, 2017.
For the years ended December 31, 2018, 2017, and $8 million2016, the pre-tax effects of cash flow hedge accounting on AOCI for the applicable registrants were as of December 31, 2016.follows:
Gain (Loss) Recognized in OCI on Derivative201820172016
 (in millions)
Southern Company   
Energy-related derivatives$17
$(47)$18
Interest rate derivatives(1)(2)(180)
Foreign currency derivatives(78)140
(58)
Total$(62)$91
$(220)
Southern Power   
Energy-related derivatives$10
$(38)$14
Foreign currency derivatives(78)140
(58)
Total$(68)$102
$(44)
    Table of Contents                                Index to Financial Statements

COMBINED NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)
Southern Company Gas and Subsidiary Companies 20172018 Annual Report


 Successor  Predecessor
Gain (Loss) Recognized in OCI on DerivativeYear Ended December 31, 2018Year Ended December 31, 2017
July 1, 2016
through
December 31, 2016
  
January 1, 2016
through
June 30, 2016
 (in millions)  (in millions)
Southern Company Gas      
Energy-related derivatives$7
$(9)$2
  $
Interest rate derivatives

(5)  (64)
Total$7
$(9)$(3)  $(64)
For all periodsyears presented, the pre-tax effecteffects of energy-related derivatives and interest rate derivatives designated as cash flow hedging instruments recognized in OCIon AOCI were immaterial for the other registrants. In addition, for the years ended December 31, 2017 and those reclassified from accumulated OCI into earnings were as follows:
 
Gain (Loss) Recognized in OCI on Derivative
(Effective Portion)
 
Gain (Loss) Reclassified from Accumulated OCI into Income
(Effective Portion)
 Successor Successor
Derivatives in Cash Flow Hedging Relationships2017Statements of Income Location2017
 (in millions) (in millions)
Energy-related derivatives$(9)Cost of natural gas$(2)
 
Gain (Loss) Recognized in OCI on Derivative
 (Effective Portion)
  Gain (Loss) Reclassified from Accumulated OCI into Income (Effective Portion)
 Successor  Predecessor  Successor  Predecessor
Derivatives in Cash Flow Hedging RelationshipsJuly 1, 2016 through December 31, 2016  January 1, 2016 through June 30, 2016 Statements of Income LocationJuly 1, 2016 through December 31, 2016  January 1, 2016 through June 30, 2016
 (in millions)  (in millions)  (in millions)  (in millions)
Energy-related derivatives$2
  $
 Cost of natural gas$(1)  $(1)
Interest rate derivatives(5)  (64) Interest expense, net of amounts capitalized
  
Total derivatives in cash flow hedging relationships$(3)  $(64)  $(1)  $(1)
 Gain (Loss) Recognized in OCI on Derivative (Effective Portion) 
Gain (Loss) Reclassified from Accumulated OCI into Income
(Effective Portion)
 Predecessor Predecessor
Derivatives in Cash Flow Hedging Relationships2015Statements of Income Location2015
 (in millions) (in millions)
Energy-related derivatives$3
Cost of natural gas$(10)
  Other operations and maintenance(1)
Interest rate derivatives
Interest expense, net of amounts capitalized2
Total derivatives in cash flow hedging relationships$3
 $(9)
There2016, there was no material ineffectiveness recorded in earnings for any period presented.registrant. Upon the adoption of ASU 2017-12, beginning in 2018, ineffectiveness was no longer separately measured and recorded in earnings. See Note 1 for additional information.
    Table of Contents                                Index to Financial Statements

COMBINED NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)
Southern Company Gas and Subsidiary Companies 20172018 Annual Report


The pre-tax effects of cash flow and fair value hedge accounting on income for the years ended December 31, 2018, 2017, and 2016 were as follows:
Location and Amount of Gain (Loss) Recognized in Income on Cash Flow and Fair Value Hedging Relationships201820172016
 (in millions)
Southern Company   
Total cost of natural gas$1,539
$1,601
$613
Gain (loss) on energy-related cash flow hedges(a)
2
(2)(1)
Total depreciation and amortization3,131
3,010
2,502
Gain (loss) on energy-related cash flow hedges(a)
7
(16)2
Total interest expense, net of amounts capitalized(1,842)(1,694)(1,317)
Gain (loss) on interest rate cash flow hedges(a)
(21)(21)(18)
Gain (loss) on foreign currency cash flow hedges(a)
(24)(23)(13)
Gain (loss) on interest rate fair value hedges(b)
(12)(22)(21)
Total other income (expense), net114
163
50
Gain (loss) on foreign currency cash flow hedges(a)(c)
(60)160
(82)
Alabama Power   
Total interest expense, net of amounts capitalized$(323)$(305)$(302)
Gain (loss) on interest rate cash flow hedges(a)
(6)(6)(6)
Georgia Power   
Total interest expense, net of amounts capitalized$(397)$(419)$(388)
Gain (loss) on interest rate cash flow hedges(a)
(4)(4)(4)
Gain (loss) on interest rate fair value hedges(b)
2
(3)(1)
Mississippi Power   
Total interest expense, net of amounts capitalized$(76)$(42)$(74)
Gain (loss) on interest rate cash flow hedges(a)
(2)(2)3
Southern Power   
Total depreciation and amortization$493
$503
$352
Gain (loss) on energy-related cash flow hedges(a)
7
(17)2
Total interest expense, net of amounts capitalized(183)(191)(117)
Gain (loss) on foreign currency cash flow hedges(a)
(24)(23)(13)
Total other income (expense), net23
1
6
Gain (loss) on foreign currency cash flow hedges(a)(c)
(60)159
(82)
(a)Reclassified from AOCI into earnings.
(b)For fair value hedges, changes in the fair value of the derivative contracts are generally equal to changes in the fair value of the underlying debt and have no material impact on income.
(c)The reclassification from AOCI into other income (expense), net completely offsets currency gains and losses arising from changes in the U.S. currency exchange rates used to record the euro-denominated notes.

COMBINED NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)
Southern Company and Subsidiary Companies 2018 Annual Report

 Successor  Predecessor
Location and Amount of Gain (Loss) Recognized in Income on Cash Flow and Fair Value Hedging RelationshipsYear Ended December 31, 2018Year Ended December 31, 2017July 1, 2016
through
December 31, 2016
  January 1, 2016
through
June 30, 2016
 (in millions)  (in millions)
Southern Company Gas      
Total cost of natural gas$1,539
$1,601
$613
  $755
Gain (loss) on energy-related cash flow hedges(*)
2
(2)(1)  (1)
(*)Amounts reflect gains or losses on cash flow hedges that were reclassified from AOCI into earnings.
The pre-tax effects of cash flow hedge accounting on income for interest rate derivatives were immaterial for all periods presented,other registrants for all years presented.
At December 31, 2018 and 2017, the following amounts were recorded on the balance sheets related to cumulative basis adjustments for fair value hedges:
 Carrying Amount of the Hedged Item Cumulative Amount of Fair Value Hedging Adjustment included in Carrying Amount of the Hedged Item
Balance Sheet Location of Hedged ItemsAt December 31, 2018At December 31, 2017 At December 31, 2018At December 31, 2017
 (in millions) (in millions)
Southern Company     
Securities due within one year$(498)$(746) $2
$3
Long-term debt(2,052)(2,553) 41
35
      
Georgia Power     
Securities due within one year$(498)$(746) $2
$3
Long-term debt
(498) 
1
The pre-tax effects of energy-related derivatives not designated as hedging instruments on the statements of income for the years ended December 31, 2018, 2017, and 2016 for the applicable registrants were as follows:
 Gain (Loss)
 Successor  Predecessor
Gain (Loss)
Derivatives in Non-Designated Hedging RelationshipsStatements of Income LocationYear Ended December 31, 2017July 1, 2016 through December 31, 2016  January 1, 2016 through June 30, 2016Year Ended December 31, 2015Statements of Income Location2018
2017
2016
 (in millions)  (in millions)
(in millions)
Southern Company      
Energy-related derivatives
Natural gas revenues(*)
$(80)$33
  $(1)$56
Natural gas revenues(*)
$(122) $(80) $33
Cost of natural gas(2)3
  (62)(6)Cost of natural gas(6) (2) 3
Wholesale electric revenues2
 (4) 2
Total derivatives in non-designated hedging relationshipsTotal derivatives in non-designated hedging relationships$(82)$36
  $(63)$50
Total derivatives in non-designated hedging relationships$(126)
$(86)
$38
(*)Excludes the impact of weather derivatives recorded in natural gas revenues of $5 million, $23 million, and $6 million for the years ended December 31, 2018, 2017, and 2016, respectively, as they are accounted for based on intrinsic value rather than fair value.

COMBINED NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)
Southern Company and Subsidiary Companies 2018 Annual Report

  Gain (Loss)
  Successor  Predecessor
Derivatives in Non-Designated Hedging RelationshipsStatements of Income LocationFor the Year Ended December 31, 2018For the Year Ended December 31, 2017July 1, 2016
through
December 31, 2016
  January 1, 2016 through
June 30, 2016
   (in millions)  (in millions)
Southern Company Gas       
Energy-related derivatives
Natural gas revenues(*)
$(122)$(80)$33
  $(1)
 Cost of natural gas(6)(2)3
  (62)
Total derivatives in non-designated hedging relationships$(128)$(82)$36
  $(63)
(*)Excludes the impact of weather derivatives recorded in natural gas revenues of $5 million and $23 million for the successor yearyears ended December 31, 2018 and 2017, respectively, $6 million for the successor period of July 1, 2016 through December 31, 2016, and $3 million for the predecessor period of January 1, 2016 through June 30, 2016, and $12 millionas they are accounted for the predecessor year ended December 31, 2015.based on intrinsic value rather than fair value.
The pre-tax effects of energy-related derivatives and interest rate derivatives not designated as hedging instruments were immaterial for all other registrants for all years presented.
Contingent Features
TheSouthern Company, doesthe traditional electric operating companies, Southern Power, and Southern Company Gas do not have any credit arrangements that would require material changes in payment schedules or terminations as a result of a credit rating downgrade. There are certain derivatives that could require collateral, but not accelerated payment, in the event of avarious credit rating change below BBB- and/or Baa3.changes of certain Southern Company subsidiaries. At December 31, 2017,2018, the Companyregistrants had no collateral posted with derivative counterparties to satisfy these arrangements.
AtFor the registrants with interest rate derivatives at December 31, 2017,2018, the fair value of interest rate derivative liabilities with contingent features was $3 million and the maximum potential collateral requirements arising from the credit-risk-related contingent features, at a rating below BBB- and/or Baa3, was $2 million.immaterial. At December 31, 2018, the fair value of energy-related derivative liabilities with contingent features and the maximum potential collateral requirements arising from the credit-risk-related contingent features, at a rating below BBB- and/or Baa3, were immaterial for all registrants. The maximum potential collateral requirements arising from the credit-risk-related contingent features for the traditional electric operating companies and Southern Power include certain agreements that could require collateral in the event that one or more Southern Company power pool participants has a credit rating change to below investment grade. Following the sale of Gulf Power to NextEra Energy, Gulf Power is continuing to participate in the Southern Company power pool for a defined transition period that, subject to certain potential adjustments, is scheduled to end on January 1, 2024.
Generally, collateral may be provided by a Southern Company guaranty, letter of credit, or cash. If collateral is required, fair value amounts recognized for the right to reclaim cash collateral or the obligation to return cash collateral are not offset against fair value amounts recognized for derivatives executed with the same counterparty.
Alabama Power and Southern Power maintain accounts with certain regional transmission organizations to facilitate financial derivative transactions. Based on the value of the positions in these accounts and the associated margin requirements, Alabama Power and Southern Power may be required to post collateral. At December 31, 2018, cash collateral posted in these accounts was immaterial. Southern Company Gas maintains accounts with brokers or the clearing houses of certain exchanges to facilitate financial derivative transactions. Based on the value of the positions in these accounts and the associated margin requirements, Southern Company Gas may be required to deposit cash into these accounts. At December 31, 2018, cash collateral held on deposit in broker margin accounts was $277 million.
The Company isregistrants are exposed to losses related to financial instruments in the event of counterparties' nonperformance. The Company hasregistrants only enter into agreements and material transactions with counterparties that have investment grade credit ratings by Moody's and S&P or with counterparties who have posted collateral to cover potential credit exposure. The registrants have also established risk management policies and controls to determine and monitor the creditworthiness of counterparties in order to mitigate the Company'stheir exposure to counterparty credit risk. Prior to entering into a physical transaction, theSouthern Company Gas assigns physical wholesale counterparties an internal credit rating and credit limit based on the counterparties' Moody's, S&P, and Fitch ratings, commercially available credit reports, and audited financial statements. TheSouthern Company Gas may require counterparties to pledge additional collateral when deemed necessary. Credit

COMBINED NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)
Southern Company and Subsidiary Companies 2018 Annual Report

In addition, Southern Company Gas conducts credit evaluations are conducted and obtains appropriate internal approvals are obtained for athe counterparty's line of credit before any transaction with the counterparty is executed. In most cases, the counterparty must have an investment grade rating, which includes a minimum long-term debt rating of Baa3 from Moody's and BBB- from S&P. Generally, theSouthern Company Gas requires credit enhancements by way of a guaranty, cash deposit, or letter of credit for transaction counterparties that do not have investment grade ratings.
TheSouthern Company Gas also utilizes master netting agreements whenever possible to mitigate exposure to counterparty credit risk. When theSouthern Company Gas is engaged in more than one outstanding derivative transaction with the same counterparty and it also has a legally enforceable netting agreement with that counterparty, the "net" mark-to-market exposure represents the netting of the positive and negative exposures with that counterparty and a reasonable measure of the Company'sSouthern Company Gas' credit risk. TheSouthern Company Gas also uses other netting agreements with certain counterparties with whom it conducts significant transactions. Master netting agreements enable theSouthern Company Gas to net certain assets and liabilities by counterparty. TheSouthern Company Gas also nets across product lines and against cash collateral provided the master netting and cash collateral agreements include such provisions. TheSouthern Company Gas may require counterparties to pledge additional collateral when deemed necessary. Therefore, the Company does
The registrants do not anticipate a material adverse effect on thetheir respective financial statements as a result of counterparty nonperformance.

15. ACQUISITIONS AND DISPOSITIONS
NOTES (continued)
Southern Company Gas and Subsidiary Companies 2017 Annual Report


11. MERGER, ACQUISITION, AND DISPOSITIONS
Merger with Southern Company Gas
On July 1, 2016, theSouthern Company completed the Merger with Southern Company. A wholly-owned, direct subsidiaryfor a total purchase price of Southern Company merged withapproximately $8.0 billion and into Southern Company Gas with the Company surviving asbecame a wholly-owned, direct subsidiary of Southern Company.
At the effective time of the Merger, each share of Southern Company Gas common stock, other than certain excluded shares, was converted into the right to receive $66 in cash, without interest. Also at the effective time of the Merger, all of the outstanding restricted stock units,Southern Company Gas RSUs, restricted stock awards, non-employee director stock awards, stock options, and performance share unitsPSUs were either redeemed or converted into Southern Company's restricted stock units.Company RSUs. See Note 812 for additional information.
The application of the acquisition method of accounting was pushed down to the Company.Southern Company Gas. The excess of the purchase price over the fair values of the Company'sSouthern Company Gas' assets and liabilities was recorded as goodwill, which represents a different basis of accounting from theSouthern Company Gas' historical basis prior to the Merger. The following table presents the final purchase price allocation:
 Successor  Predecessor  
 New Basis  Old Basis Change in Basis
 (in millions)  (in millions)
Current assets$1,557
  $1,474
 $83
Property, plant, and equipment10,108
  10,148
 (40)
Goodwill5,967
  1,813
 4,154
Other intangible assets400
  101
 299
Regulatory assets1,118
  679
 439
Other assets229
  273
 (44)
Current liabilities(2,201)  (2,205) 4
Other liabilities(4,742)  (4,600) (142)
Long-term debt(4,261)  (3,709) (552)
Contingently redeemable noncontrolling interest(174)  (41) (133)
Total purchase price/equity$8,001
  $3,933
 $4,068
Measurement period adjustments were recorded to the purchase price allocation during the fourth quarter 2016, which resulted in a net $30 million increase in goodwill to establish intangible liabilities for transportation contracts at wholesale services, partially offset by adjustments to deferred tax balances.
In determining the fair value of assets and liabilities subject to rate regulation that allows recovery of costs and/or a fair return on investments, historical cost was deemed to be a reasonable proxy for fair value, as it is included in rate base or otherwise specified in regulatory recovery mechanisms. Property, plant, and equipment subject to rate regulation was reflected based on the historical gross amount of assets in service and accumulated depreciation, as they are included in rate base. For certain assets and liabilities subject to rate regulation (such as debt instruments and employee benefit obligations), the fair value adjustment was applied to historical cost with a corresponding offset to regulatory asset or liability based on the assessment of probable future recovery in rates.
For unregulated assets and liabilities, fair value adjustments were applied to historical cost of natural gas for sale, property, plant, and equipment, debt instruments, and noncontrolling interest. The valuation of other intangible assets included customer relationships, trade names, and favorable/unfavorable contracts. The valuation of these assets and liabilities applied either the market approach or income approach. The market approach was utilized when prices and other relevant market information were available. The income approach, which is based on discounted cash flows, was primarily based on significant unobservable inputs (Level 3). Key estimates and inputs included forecasted profitability and cash flows, customer retention rates, royalty rates, and discount rates.
The estimated fair value of deferred income taxes was determined by applying the appropriate enacted statutory tax rate to the temporary differences that arose on the differences between the financial reporting value and tax basis of the assets acquired and liabilities assumed.
 
Southern
Company Gas Successor
  
Southern
Company Gas Predecessor
  
Southern Company Gas Purchase PriceNew Basis  Old Basis Change in Basis
 (in millions)  (in millions)
Current assets$1,557
  $1,474
 $83
Property, plant, and equipment10,108
  10,148
 (40)
Goodwill5,967
  1,813
 4,154
Other intangible assets400
  101
 299
Regulatory assets1,118
  679
 439
Other assets229
  273
 (44)
Current liabilities(2,201)  (2,205) 4
Other liabilities(4,742)  (4,600) (142)
Long-term debt(4,261)  (3,709) (552)
Contingently redeemable noncontrolling interest(174)  (41) (133)
Total purchase price$8,001
  $3,933
 $4,068
    Table of Contents                                Index to Financial Statements

COMBINED NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)
Southern Company Gas and Subsidiary Companies 20172018 Annual Report


Southern Company Gas' Results of Operations and Pro Forma Financial Information
The excessresults of operations for Southern Company Gas have been included in Southern Company's consolidated financial statements from the date of acquisition and consisted of operating revenues of $1.7 billion and net income of $114 million in 2016.
The following summarized unaudited pro forma consolidated statement of earnings information assumes that the acquisition of Southern Company Gas was completed on January 1, 2015. The summarized unaudited pro forma consolidated statement of earnings information includes adjustments for (i) intercompany sales, (ii) amortization of intangible assets, (iii) adjustments to interest expense to reflect current interest rates on Southern Company Gas debt and additional interest expense associated with borrowings by Southern Company to fund the Merger, and (iv) the elimination of nonrecurring expenses associated with the Merger.
 2016
  
Operating revenues (in millions)$21,791
Net income attributable to Southern Company (in millions)$2,591
Basic EPS$2.70
Diluted EPS$2.68
These unaudited pro forma results are for comparative purposes only and may not be indicative of the results that would have occurred had this acquisition been completed on January 1, 2015 or the results that would be attained in the future.
Southern Company Acquisition of PowerSecure
In May 2016, Southern Company acquired all of the outstanding stock of PowerSecure for $18.75 per common share in cash, resulting in an aggregate purchase price overof $429 million. As a result, PowerSecure became a wholly-owned subsidiary of Southern Company.
The acquisition of PowerSecure was accounted for using the estimatedacquisition method of accounting with the assets acquired and liabilities assumed recognized at fair value as of the acquisition date. The following table presents the final purchase price allocation:
PowerSecure Purchase Price 
 (in millions)
Current assets$172
Property, plant, and equipment46
Intangible assets106
Goodwill284
Other assets4
Current liabilities(121)
Long-term debt, including current portion(48)
Deferred credits and other liabilities(14)
Total purchase price$429
The results of operations for PowerSecure have been included in Southern Company's consolidated financial statements from the date of acquisition and are immaterial to the consolidated financial results of Southern Company. Pro forma results of operations have not been presented for the acquisition because the effects of the acquisition were immaterial to Southern Company's consolidated financial results for all periods presented.
Southern Company's Sale of Gulf Power
On January 1, 2019, Southern Company completed the sale of all of the capital stock of Gulf Power to 700 Universe, LLC, a wholly-owned subsidiary of NextEra Energy, for an aggregate cash purchase price of approximately $5.8 billion (less $1.3 billion of indebtedness assumed), subject to customary working capital adjustments.

COMBINED NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)
Southern Company and Subsidiary Companies 2018 Annual Report

The assets and liabilities of $6 billionGulf Power are classified as assets held for sale and liabilities held for sale on Southern Company's balance sheet as of December 31, 2018. See "Assets Held for Sale" herein for additional information.
Southern Power
During 2018 and 2017, Southern Power or one of its wholly-owned subsidiaries acquired or completed construction of the facilities discussed below. Acquisition-related costs were expensed as incurred and were not material for any of the years presented.
Acquisitions During the Year Ended December 31, 2018
During 2018, Southern Power acquired and completed the project below and acquired the Wild Horse Mountain and Reading wind facilities discussed under "Construction Projects Completed and/or in Progress" below.
Project FacilityResourceSeller, Acquisition Date
Approximate Nameplate Capacity (MW)
LocationOwnership PercentageActual CODPPA Contract Period
Gaskell West 1SolarRecurrent Energy Development Holdings, LLC,
January 26, 2018
20Kern County, CA100% of Class B
(*)
March
2018
20 years
(*)Southern Power owns 100% of the class B membership interests under a tax equity partnership.
The Gaskell West 1 facility did not have operating revenues or activities prior to being placed in service during March 2018.
Acquisitions During the Year Ended December 31, 2017
The following table presents Southern Power's acquisition activity for the year ended December 31, 2017.
Project FacilityResourceSeller, Acquisition Date
Approximate Nameplate Capacity (MW)
 LocationOwnership PercentageActual CODPPA Contract Period
BethelWindInvenergy Wind Global LLC,
January 6, 2017
276 Castro County, TX100% January 201712 years
Cactus Flats(*)
WindRES America Developments, Inc.,
July 31, 2017
148 Concho County, TX100% July 201812 years and 15 years
(*)On July 31, 2017, Southern Power purchased 100% of the Cactus Flats facility. In August 2018, Southern Power closed on a tax equity partnership and owns 100% of the class B membership interests.
Southern Power's aggregate purchase price for acquisitions during the year ended December 31, 2017 was $539 million. The fair values of the assets acquired and liabilities assumed were finalized in 2017 and recorded as follows:
 2017
 (in millions)
Restricted cash$16
CWIP534
Other assets5
Accounts payable(16)
Total purchase price$539
In 2017, total revenues of $15 million and net income of $17 million, primarily as a result of PTCs, were recognized in the consolidated statements of income by Southern Power related to the 2017 acquisitions. The Bethel facility did not have operating revenues or activities prior to completion of construction and being placed in service, and the Cactus Flats facility was still under construction. Therefore, supplemental pro forma information as goodwill,though the acquisitions occurred as of the beginning of 2017 is not meaningful and has been omitted.

COMBINED NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)
Southern Company and Subsidiary Companies 2018 Annual Report

Construction Projects Completed and/or in Progress
During 2018, in accordance with its growth strategy, Southern Power started, continued, or completed construction of the projects set forth in the table below. Total aggregate construction costs, excluding the acquisition costs, are expected to be between $575 million and $640 million for the Plant Mankato expansion, Wild Horse Mountain, and Reading facilities. At December 31, 2018, construction costs included in CWIP related to these projects totaled $289 million, except for the Plant Mankato expansion which is primarily attributableclassified as assets held for sale in the financial statements. The ultimate outcome of these matters cannot be determined at this time.
Project FacilityResource
Approximate Nameplate Capacity (MW)
Location
Actual/Expected
COD
PPA CounterpartiesPPA Contract Period
Construction Projects Completed During the Year Ended December 31, 2018
Cactus Flats(a)
Wind148Concho County, TXJuly 2018General Motors, LLC
and
General Mills Operations, LLC
12 years
and
15 years
Projects Under Construction at December 31, 2018
Mankato expansion(b)
Natural Gas385Mankato, MNSecond quarter 2019Northern States Power Company20 years
Wild Horse Mountain(c)
Wind100Pushmataha County, OKFourth quarter 2019Arkansas Electric Cooperative20 years
Reading(d)
Wind200Osage and Lyon Counties, KSSecond quarter 2020Royal Caribbean Cruises LTD12 years
(a)In July 2017, Southern Power purchased 100% of the Cactus Flats facility. In August 2018, Southern Power closed on a tax equity partnership and now owns 100% of the class B membership interests.
(b)In November 2018, Southern Power entered into an agreement to sell all of its equity interests in Plant Mankato, including this expansion currently under construction. See "Sales of Natural Gas Plants" below.
(c)In May 2018, Southern Power purchased 100% of the Wild Horse Mountain facility. Southern Power may enter into a tax equity partnership, in which case it would then own 100% of the class B membership interests. The ultimate outcome of this matter cannot be determined at this time.
(d)In August 2018, Southern Power purchased 100% of the membership interests of the Reading facility from the joint development arrangement with Renewable Energy Systems Americas, Inc. described below. Southern Power may enter into a tax equity partnership, in which case it would then own 100% of the class B membership interests. The ultimate outcome of this matter cannot be determined at this time.
Development Projects
During 2017, Southern Power purchased wind turbine equipment to positioning be used for various development and construction projects. Any wind projects using this equipment and reaching commercial operation by the end of 2021 are expected to qualify for 80% PTCs.
During 2016, Southern Power entered into a joint development agreement with Renewable Energy Systems Americas, Inc. (RES) to develop and construct wind projects. Concurrent with the agreement, Southern Power purchased wind turbine equipment from Siemens Wind Power, Inc. and Vestas-American Wind Technology, Inc. to be used for construction of these projects. Several wind projects using this equipment, as well as other purchased equipment, have successfully originated, directly or indirectly, from the partnership with RES and are expected to reach commercial operation before the end of 2020, thus qualifying for 100% PTCs.
Southern Power continues to evaluate and refine the deployment of the wind turbine equipment to potential joint development and construction projects as well as the amount of MW capacity to be constructed. During the third quarter 2018, as a result of a review of various options for probable dispositions of wind turbine equipment not deployed to development or construction projects, Southern Power recorded a $36 million asset impairment charge on the equipment.
Subsequent to December 31, 2018 and as part of management's continuous review of disposition options, approximately $53 million of this equipment is being marketed for sale and will be classified as held for sale.
The ultimate outcome of these matters cannot be determined at this time.
Sales of Renewable Facility Interests
On May 22, 2018, Southern Power completed the sale of a noncontrolling 33% equity interest in SP Solar, a limited partnership indirectly owning substantially all of Southern Power's solar facilities, to Global Atlantic for approximately $1.2 billion. Since Southern Power retains control of the limited partnership through its wholly-owned general partner, the sale was recorded as an

COMBINED NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)
Southern Company and Subsidiary Companies 2018 Annual Report

equity transaction and Southern Power will continue to provide natural gas infrastructureconsolidate SP Solar in its financial statements. On the date of the transaction, the noncontrolling interest was increased by $511 million to meet customers' growing energy needsreflect 33% of the carrying value of the partnership. This difference, partially offset by the tax impact and other related transaction charges, also resulted in a $410 million decrease to competeSouthern Power's common stockholder's equity.
On December 11, 2018, Southern Power completed the sale of a noncontrolling tax equity interest in SP Wind, which owns a portfolio of eight operating wind facilities, to three financial investors for growth acrossapproximately $1.2 billion. Since Southern Power retains control of SP Wind, it will continue to consolidate SP Wind in its financial statements. The tax equity investors together will generally receive 40% of the energy value chain.cash distributions from available cash and will receive a 99% allocation of tax attributes, including future PTCs.
Sales of Natural Gas Plants
On December 4, 2018, Southern Power completed the sale of all of its equity interests in the Florida Plants to NextEra Energy for $203 million. In contemplation of this sale transaction, Southern Power recorded an asset impairment charge of approximately $119 million ($89 million after tax) in May 2018.
On November 5, 2018, Southern Power entered into an agreement with Northern States Power to sell all of its equity interests in Plant Mankato (including the 385-MW expansion currently under construction) for an aggregate purchase price of approximately $650 million. The Company anticipatescompletion of the disposition is subject to the expansion unit reaching commercial operation as well as various other customary conditions to closing, including working capital and timing adjustments. The ultimate purchase price will decrease $66,667 per day for each day after June 1, 2019 that the majorityexpansion has not achieved commercial operation, not to exceed $15 million. This transaction is subject to FERC and state commission approvals and is expected to close in mid-2019. The assets and liabilities of the value assigned to goodwill will not be deductiblePlant Mankato are classified as assets held for tax purposes.
The receiptsale and liabilities held for sale on Southern Company's and Southern Power's balance sheet as of required regulatory approvals was conditioned upon certain terms and commitments. In connection with these regulatory approvals, certain regulatory agencies prohibited the Company from recovering goodwill and Merger-related expenses, required the Company to maintain a minimum number of employeesDecember 31, 2018. See "Assets Held for a set period of time to ensure that certain pipeline safety standards and the competence level of the employee workforce is not degraded, and/or required the Company to maintain its pre-Merger level of support for various social and charitable programs. The most notable terms and commitments with potential financial impacts included:
rate credits of $18 million to be paid to customers in New Jersey and Maryland;
sharing of Merger savings with customers in Georgia starting in 2020;
phasing-out the use of the Nicor name or logo by certain of the Company's gas marketing services subsidiaries in conducting non-utility business in Illinois;
reaffirming that Elizabethtown Gas would file a base rate case no later than September 1, 2016, with another base rate case no later than three years after the 2016 rate case; and
requiring Elkton Gas to file a base rate case within two years of closing the Merger.
There is no restriction on the Company's other utilities' ability to file future rate cases. The rate credits to customers in New Jersey and Maryland were paid during the third and fourth quarters of 2016, respectively. The use of the Nicor name and logo was phased out, effective November 1, 2017, by certain of the Company's gas marketing services subsidiaries in conducting non-utility business in Illinois. Elizabethtown Gas filed a base rate case with the New Jersey BPU on September 1, 2016. See Note 3 under "Base Rate Cases"Sale" herein for additional information. Upon completionThe ultimate outcome of this matter cannot be determined at this time.
Southern Company Gas
See "Southern Company Merger with Southern Company Gas" herein for information regarding the Merger, the Company amended and restated its Bylaws and Articles of Incorporation, under which it now has the authority to issue no more than 110 million shares of stock consisting of (i) 100 million shares of common stock and (ii) 10 million shares of preferred stock, both categories of which have a par value of $0.01 per share. The amended and restated Articles of Incorporation do not allow any treasury shares to be held.Merger.
Investment in SNG
In September 2016, theSouthern Company Gas, through a wholly-owned, indirect subsidiary, acquired a 50% equity interest in SNG pursuant to a definitive agreement between Southern Company andfrom Kinder Morgan, Inc. in July 2016, to which Southern Company assigned all rights and obligations to the Company in August 2016.for $1.4 billion. SNG owns a 7,000-mile pipeline system connecting natural gas supply basins in Texas, Louisiana, Mississippi, and Alabama to markets in Louisiana, Mississippi, Alabama, Florida, Georgia, South Carolina, and Tennessee. The purchase price of $1.4 billion was financed by a $1.05 billion equity contribution from Southern Company and $360 million of cash paid by the Company, which was financed by a promissory note from Southern Company repaid with a portion of the proceeds from senior notes issued in September 2016. The purchase price of the 50% equity interest exceeded the underlying ownership interest in the net assets of SNG by approximately $700 million. This basis difference iswas attributable to goodwill and deferred tax assets. While the deferred tax assets will be amortized through deferred tax expense, the goodwill will not be amortized and is not required to be tested for impairment on an annual basis. The Company's
In March 2017, Southern Company Gas made an additional $50 million contribution to maintain its 50% equity interest in SNG. See Note 7 under "Southern Company Gas" for additional information on this investment.
Southern Company Gas' investment in SNG decreased by $104 million at December 31, 2017 related to the impact of the Tax Reform Legislation and new income tax apportionment factors in several states resulting from the Company'sSouthern Company Gas' inclusion in the consolidated Southern Company state tax filings.
Sale of Pivotal Home Solutions
On March 31, 2017,June 4, 2018, Southern Company Gas completed the stock sale of Pivotal Home Solutions to American Water Enterprises LLC for a total cash purchase price of $365 million, which includes the final working capital adjustment. This disposition resulted in a net loss of $67 million, which includes $34 million of income tax expense. In contemplation of the transaction, a goodwill impairment charge of $42 million was recorded during the first quarter 2018. The income tax expense included tax on goodwill not deductible for tax purposes and for which a deferred tax liability had not been recorded previously. Southern Company made an additional $50 million contribution to maintain its 50% equity interest in SNG. See NoteGas and American Water Enterprises LLC entered into a transition services agreement whereby Southern Company Gas provided certain administrative and operational services through November 4, under "Equity Method Investments" for additional information on this investment.2018.
Proposed Sale of Elizabethtown Gas and Elkton Gas
On October 15, 2017, the Company'sJuly 1, 2018, a Southern Company Gas subsidiary, Pivotal Utility Holdings, entered into agreements forcompleted the salesales of the assets of two of its natural gas distribution utilities, Elizabethtown Gas and Elkton Gas, to South Jersey Industries, Inc. for a total cash purchase price of $1.7 billion. The completion of each asset sale is subject to the satisfaction or waiver of certain conditions, including, among other customary closing conditions, the receipt of required regulatory approvals, including the FERC, the Federal Communications Commission, the New Jersey BPU, and, with respect to the sale of Elkton Gas, the Maryland PSC. The Company and South Jersey Industries, Inc. made joint filings on December 22, 2017 and January 16, 2018 with the New Jersey BPU and the Maryland PSC, respectively, requesting regulatory approval. The asset sales are expected to be completed by the end of the third quarter 2018.
The ultimate outcome of these matters cannot be determined at this time.
    Table of Contents                                Index to Financial Statements

COMBINED NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)
Southern Company Gas and Subsidiary Companies 20172018 Annual Report


12.of $1.7 billion, which includes the final working capital and other adjustments. This disposition resulted in a pre-tax gain that was entirely offset by $205 million of income tax expense, resulting in no material net income impact. The income tax expense included tax on goodwill not deductible for tax purposes and for which a deferred tax liability had not been recorded previously. Southern Company Gas and South Jersey Industries, Inc. entered into transition services agreements whereby Southern Company Gas will provide certain administrative and operational services through no later than July 31, 2020.
Sale of Florida City Gas
On July 29, 2018, Southern Company Gas and its wholly-owned direct subsidiary, NUI Corporation, completed the stock sale of Pivotal Utility Holdings, which primarily consisted of Florida City Gas, to NextEra Energy for a total cash purchase price of $587 million, which includes the final working capital adjustment. This disposition resulted in a net gain of $16 million, which includes $103 million of income tax expense. The income tax expense included tax on goodwill not deductible for tax purposes and for which a deferred tax liability had not been recorded previously. Southern Company Gas and NextEra Energy entered into a transition services agreement whereby Southern Company Gas will provide certain administrative and operational services through no later than July 29, 2020.
Assets Held for Sale
As discussed previously, Southern Company and Southern Power each have assets and liabilities held for sale on their balance sheets at December 31, 2018. Assets and liabilities held for sale have been classified separately on each company's balance sheet at the lower of carrying value or fair value less costs to sell at the time the criteria for held-for-sale classification were met. For assets and liabilities held for sale recorded at fair value on a nonrecurring basis, the fair value of assets held for sale is based primarily on unobservable inputs (Level 3), which includes the agreed upon sales prices in executed sales agreements.
Upon classification as held for sale in May 2018 for the Florida Plants and November 2018 for Plant Mankato, Southern Power ceased recognizing depreciation on the property, plant, and equipment to be sold. The Florida Plants sale was completed on December 4, 2018. Since the depreciation of the assets sold in the Gulf Power transaction continued to be reflected in customer rates through the closing date and was reflected in the carryover basis of the assets when sold, Southern Company continued to record depreciation on those assets through the date the transaction closed. Likewise, since the depreciation of the assets sold in the Elizabethtown Gas, Elkton Gas, and Florida City Gas transactions continued to be reflected in customer rates and was reflected in the carryover basis of the assets when sold, Southern Company Gas continued to record depreciation on those assets through the respective date that each transaction closed.
The following table provides Southern Company's and Southern Power's major classes of assets and liabilities classified as held for sale at December 31, 2018:
 Southern Company
Southern
Power
 (in millions)
Assets Held for Sale:  
Current assets$393
$8
Total property, plant, and equipment4,623
576
Other non-current assets727

Total Assets Held for Sale$5,743
$584
   
Liabilities Held for Sale:  
Current liabilities$425
$15
Long-term debt1,286

Accumulated deferred income taxes618

Other non-current liabilities932

Total Liabilities Held for Sale$3,261
$15
Southern Company, Southern Power, and Southern Company Gas each concluded that the asset sales, both individually and combined, did not represent a strategic shift in operations that has, or is expected to have, a major effect on its operations and financial results; therefore, none of the assets related to the sales have been classified as discontinued operations for any of the periods presented.

COMBINED NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)
Southern Company and Subsidiary Companies 2018 Annual Report

Gulf Power and the Florida Plants represent individually significant components of Southern Company and Southern Power, respectively; therefore, pre-tax income for these components for the years ended December 31, 2018, 2017, and 2016 are presented below:
 201820172016
 (in millions)
Earnings (loss) before income taxes:   
Gulf Power$140
$229
$231
Southern Power's Florida Plants(*)
$49
$37
$37
(*)Earnings before income taxes for the Florida Plants in 2018 represents the period from January 1, 2018 to December 4, 2018 (the divestiture date).
16. SEGMENT AND RELATED INFORMATION
Southern Company
The primary businesses of the Southern Company system are electricity sales by the traditional electric operating companies and Southern Power and the distribution of natural gas by Southern Company Gas. The traditional electric operating companies – Alabama Power, Georgia Power, Gulf Power (through December 31, 2018), and Mississippi Power – are vertically integrated utilities providing electric service in four Southeastern states. On January 1, 2019, Southern Company completed its sale of Gulf Power to NextEra Energy. Southern Power develops, constructs, acquires, owns, and manages power generation assets, including renewable energy projects, and sells electricity at market-based rates in the wholesale market. Southern Company Gas distributes natural gas through its natural gas distribution utilities and is involved in several other complementary businesses including gas pipeline investments, wholesale gas services, and gas marketing services. In July 2018, Southern Company Gas completed sales of three of its natural gas distribution utilities. See Note 15 for additional information regarding disposition activities.
Southern Company's reportable business segments are the sale of electricity by the traditional electric operating companies, the sale of electricity in the competitive wholesale market by Southern Power, and the sale of natural gas and other complementary products and services by Southern Company Gas. Revenues from sales by Southern Power to the traditional electric operating companies were $435 million, $392 million, and $419 million in 2018, 2017, and 2016, respectively. Revenues from sales of natural gas from Southern Company Gas to the traditional electric operating companies and Southern Power were $32 million and $119 million, respectively, in 2018, $23 million and $119 million, respectively, in 2017, and $11 million and $17 million, respectively, in 2016. The "All Other" column includes the Southern Company parent entity, which does not allocate operating expenses to business segments. Also, this category includes segments below the quantitative threshold for separate disclosure. These segments include providing energy technologies and services to electric utilities and large industrial, commercial, institutional, and municipal customers, as well as investments in telecommunications and leveraged lease projects. All other inter-segment revenues are not material.

COMBINED NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)
Southern Company and Subsidiary Companies 2018 Annual Report

Financial data for business segments and products and services for the years ended December 31, 2018, 2017, and 2016 was as follows:
 Electric Utilities    
 
Traditional
Electric
Operating
Companies
Southern
Power
EliminationsTotalSouthern Company Gas
All
Other
EliminationsConsolidated
 (in millions)
2018        
Operating revenues$16,843
$2,205
$(477)$18,571
$3,909
$1,213
$(198)$23,495
Depreciation and amortization2,072
493

2,565
500
66

3,131
Interest income23
8

31
4
8
(5)38
Earnings from equity method investments(1)

(1)148
2
(1)148
Interest expense852
183

1,035
228
580
(1)1,842
Income taxes (benefit)371
(164)
207
464
(222)
449
Segment net income (loss)(a)(b)(c)(d)
2,117
187

2,304
372
(453)3
2,226
Goodwill
2


2
5,015
298

5,315
Total assets79,382
14,883
(306)93,959
21,448
3,285
(1,778)116,914
Gross property additions6,077
315

6,392
1,399
414

8,205
2017        
Operating revenues$16,884
$2,075
$(419)$18,540
$3,920
$741
$(170)$23,031
Depreciation and amortization1,954
503

2,457
501
52

3,010
Interest income14
7

21
3
11
(9)26
Earnings from equity method investments1


1
106
(1)
106
Interest expense820
191

1,011
200
490
(7)1,694
Income taxes (benefit)1,021
(939)
82
367
(307)
142
Segment net income (loss)(a)(b)(e)(f)
(193)1,071

878
243
(279)
842
Goodwill
2

2
5,967
299

6,268
Total assets72,204
15,206
(325)87,085
22,987
2,552
(1,619)111,005
Gross property additions3,836
268

4,104
1,525
355

5,984
2016        
Operating revenues$16,803
$1,577
$(439)$17,941
$1,652
$463
$(160)$19,896
Depreciation and amortization1,881
352

2,233
238
31

2,502
Interest income6
7

13
2
20
(15)20
Earnings from equity method investments2


2
60
(3)
59
Interest expense814
117

931
81
317
(12)1,317
Income taxes (benefit)1,286
(195)
1,091
76
(216)
951
Segment net income (loss)(a)(b)
2,233
338

2,571
114
(230)(7)2,448
Goodwill
2

2
5,967
282

6,251
Total assets72,141
15,169
(316)86,994
21,853
2,474
(1,624)109,697
Gross property additions4,852
2,114

6,966
618
41
(1)7,624
(a)Attributable to Southern Company.
(b)
Segment net income (loss) for the traditional electric operating companies includes pre-tax charges for estimated losses on plants under construction of $1.1 billion ($722 million after tax) in 2018, $3.4 billion ($2.4 billion after tax) in 2017, and $428 million ($264 million after tax) in 2016. See Note 2 under "Georgia PowerNuclear Construction" and "Mississippi PowerKemper County Energy FacilitySchedule and Cost Estimate" for additional information.
(c)
Segment net income (loss) for Southern Power includes pre-tax impairment charges of $156 million ($117 million after tax) in 2018. See Note 15 under "Southern PowerDevelopment Projects" and " – Sales of Natural Gas Plants" for additional information.
(d)
Segment net income (loss) for Southern Company Gas includes a net gain on dispositions of $291 million ($51 million loss after tax) in 2018 related to the Southern Company Gas Dispositions and a goodwill impairment charge of $42 million in 2018 related to the sale of Pivotal Home Solutions. See Note 15 under "Southern Company Gas" for additional information.
(e)
Segment net income (loss) for the traditional electric operating companies includes a pre-tax charge for the write-down of Gulf Power's ownership of Plant Scherer Unit 3 of $33 million ($20 million after tax) in 2017. See Note 2 under "Southern CompanyGulf Power" for additional information.
(f)
Segment net income (loss) includes income tax expense of $367 million for the traditional electric operating companies, income tax benefit of $743 million for Southern Power, and income tax expense of $93 million for Southern Company Gas in 2017 related to the Tax Reform Legislation.

COMBINED NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)
Southern Company and Subsidiary Companies 2018 Annual Report

Products and Services
Electric Utilities' Revenues
YearRetail Wholesale Other Total
 (in millions)
2018$15,222
 $2,516
 $833
 $18,571
201715,330
 2,426
 784
 18,540
201615,234
 1,926
 781
 17,941
Southern Company Gas' Revenues
YearGas
Distribution
Operations
 Gas
Marketing
Services
 All Other Total
 (in millions)
2018$3,155
 $568
 $186
 $3,909
20173,024
 860
 36
 3,920
20161,266
 354
 32
 1,652
Southern Company Gas
Southern Company Gas manages its business through four reportable segments - gas distribution operations, gas marketing services,pipeline investments, wholesale gas services, and gas midstream operations.marketing services. The non-reportable segments are combined and presented as all other. In conjunction with the Merger, theDuring 2018, Southern Company Gas changed the names of certainits reportable segments to betterfurther align withthe way its new parent company.Chief Operating Decision Maker reviews operating results and has reclassified prior years' data to conform to the new reportable segment presentation. This change resulted in a new reportable segment, gas pipeline investments, which was formerly included in gas midstream operations.
Gas distribution operations is the largest component of the Company'sSouthern Company Gas' business and includes natural gas local distribution utilities that construct, manage, and maintain intrastate natural gas pipelines and gas distribution facilities in sevenfour states. In July 2018, Southern Company Gas marketing services includessold three of its natural gas marketingdistribution utilities, Elizabethtown Gas, Elkton Gas, and Florida City Gas. See Note 15 under "Southern Company Gas" for additional information.
Gas pipeline investments consists of joint ventures in natural gas pipeline investments including a 50% interest in SNG, two significant pipeline construction projects, and a 50% joint ownership interest in the Dalton Pipeline. These natural gas pipelines enable the provision of diverse sources of natural gas supplies to end-usethe customers primarily in Georgiaof Southern Company Gas. See Notes 5 and Illinois. Additionally, gas marketing services provides home equipment protection products and services. 7 for additional information.
Wholesale gas services provides natural gas asset management and/or related logistics services for each of the Company'sSouthern Company Gas' utilities except Nicor Gas as well as for non-affiliated companies. Additionally, wholesale gas services segment engages in natural gas storage and gas pipeline arbitrage and related activities. Since the acquisition
Gas marketing services provides natural gas marketing to end-use customers primarily in Georgia and Illinois through SouthStar. On June 4, 2018, Southern Company Gas sold Pivotal Home Solutions, which provided home equipment protection products and services. See Note 15 under "Southern Company GasSale of the Company's 50% interest in SNG, gas midstream operations primarily consists of the Company's gas pipeline investments, with storage and fuel operations also aggregated into this segment. Pivotal Home Solutions" for additional information.
The all other column includes segments below the quantitative threshold for separate disclosure, including the storage and fuels operations, which was formerly included in gas midstream operations, and the other subsidiaries that fall below the quantitative threshold for separate disclosure.
After the Merger, theSouthern Company Gas changed the segment performance measure to net income, which is utilized by its parent company. In order to properly assess net income by segment, theSouthern Company Gas executed various intercompany note agreements to revise interest charges to its segments. Since such agreements did not exist in the predecessor periods, theperiod, Southern Company Gas is unable to provide the comparable net income for those periods.that period.
    Table of Contents                                Index to Financial Statements

COMBINED NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)
Southern Company Gas and Subsidiary Companies 20172018 Annual Report


Financial data for business segments for the successor yearyears ended December 31, 2018 and 2017, the successor period of July 1, 2016 through December 31, 2016, and the predecessor periodsperiod of January 1, 2016 through June 30, 2016 and the year ended December 31, 2015 were as follows:
Gas Distribution Operations Gas Marketing Services 
Wholesale Gas Services(a)
 Gas Midstream Operations Total All Other Eliminations Consolidated
Gas Distribution Operations(a)(b)
 Gas Pipeline Investments 
Wholesale Gas Services(c)
 
Gas Marketing Services(b)(d)
 Total All Other Eliminations Consolidated
(in millions)(in millions)
Successor – Year ended December 31, 2018Successor – Year ended December 31, 2018          
Operating revenues$3,186
 $32
 $144
 $568
 $3,930
 $55
 $(76) $3,909
Depreciation and
amortization
409
 5
 2
 37
 453
 47
 
 500
Operating income (loss)904
 20
 70
 19
 1,013
 (98) 
 915
Earnings from equity method investments
 145
 
 
 145
 3
 
 148
Interest expense(178) (34) (9) (6) (227) (1) 
 (228)
Income taxes (benefit)409
 28
 4
 54
 495
 (31) 
 464
Segment net income (loss)(b)
334
 103
 38
 (40) 435
 (63) 
 372
Gross property
additions
1,429
 32
 
 6
 1,467
 54
 
 1,521
Successor – Total assets
at December 31, 2018
17,266
 1,763
 1,302
 1,587
 21,918
 11,112
 (11,582) 21,448
Successor – Year ended December 31, 2017Successor – Year ended December 31, 2017          Successor – Year ended December 31, 2017          
Operating revenues$3,207
 $860
 $6
 $71
 $4,144
 $10
 $(234) $3,920
$3,207
 $17
 $6
 $860
 $4,090
 $64
 $(234) $3,920
Depreciation and
amortization
391
 62
 2
 18
 473
 28
 
 501
391
 2
 2
 62
 457
 44
 
 501
Operating income (loss)650
 113
 (51) (10) 702
 (37) 
 665
645
 10
 (51) 113
 717
 (57) 
 660
Earnings from equity method investments
 
 
 103
 103
 3
 
 106

 103
 
 
 103
 3
 
 106
Interest expense(153) (5) (7) (33) (198) (2) 
 (200)(153) (26) (7) (5) (191) (9) 
 (200)
Income taxes(b)
178
 24
 
 61
 263
 104
 
 367
Segment net income (loss)(b)
353
 84
 (57) 3
 383
 (140) 
 243
Income taxes(e)178
 109
 
 24
 311
 56
 
 367
Segment net income (loss)(e)353
 (22) (57) 84
 358
 (115) 
 243
Gross property
additions
1,330
 9
 1
 134
 1,474
 34
 
 1,508
1,330
 117
 1
 9
 1,457
 51
 
 1,508
Successor – Total assets
at December 31, 2017
19,358
 2,147
 1,096
 2,241
 24,842
 12,184
 (14,039) 22,987
19,358
 1,699
 1,096
 2,147
 24,300
 12,726
 (14,039) 22,987
Successor – July 1, 2016 through December 31, 2016Successor – July 1, 2016 through December 31, 2016          Successor – July 1, 2016 through December 31, 2016          
Operating revenues$1,342
 $354
 $24
 $31
 $1,751
 $3
 $(102) $1,652
$1,342
 $3
 $24
 $354
 $1,723
 $31
 $(102) $1,652
Depreciation and
amortization
185
 35
 1
 9
 230
 8
 
 238
185
 
 1
 35
 221
 17
 
 238
Operating income (loss)222
 27
 (2) (7) 240
 (43) 
 197
225
 1
 (2) 27
 251
 (52) 
 199
Earnings from equity
method investments

 
 
 58
 58
 2
 
 60

 58
 
 
 58
 2
 
 60
Interest expense(105) (1) (3) (16) (125) 44
 
 (81)(105) (10) (3) (1) (119) 38
 
 (81)
Income taxes(e)51
 7
 (3) 16
 71
 5
 
 76
Segment net income (loss)(e)77
 19
 
 20
 116
 (2) 
 114
Income taxes (benefit)51
 21
 (3) 7
 76
 
 
 76
Segment net income (loss)77
 29
 
 19
 125
 (11) 
 114
Gross property
additions
561
 5
 1
 54
 621
 11
 
 632
561
 51
 1
 5
 618
 14
 
 632
Successor – Total assets
at December 31, 2016
19,453
 2,084
 1,127
 2,211
 24,875
 11,145
 (14,167) 21,853
19,453
 1,659
 1,127
 2,084
 24,323
 11,697
 (14,167) 21,853
    Table of Contents                                Index to Financial Statements

COMBINED NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)
Southern Company Gas and Subsidiary Companies 20172018 Annual Report


Gas Distribution Operations Gas Marketing Services 
Wholesale Gas Services(a)
 Gas Midstream Operations Total All Other Eliminations Consolidated
Gas Distribution Operations(a)(b)
 Gas Pipeline Investments 
Wholesale Gas Services(c)
 
Gas Marketing Services(b)(d)
 Total All Other Eliminations Consolidated
(in millions)(in millions)
Predecessor – January 1, 2016 through June 30, 2016Predecessor – January 1, 2016 through June 30, 2016          Predecessor – January 1, 2016 through June 30, 2016   
     
Operating revenues$1,575
 $435
 $(32) $25
 $2,003
 $4
 $(102) $1,905
$1,575
 $3
 $(32) $435
 $1,981
 $26
 $(102) $1,905
Depreciation and
amortization
178
 11
 1
 9
 199
 7
 
 206
178
 
 1
 11
 190
 16
 
 206
Operating income (loss)351
 109
 (69) (9) 382
 (61) 
 321
353
 3
 (69) 109
 396
 (73) 
 323
EBIT353
 109
 (68) (6) 388
 (60) 
 328
353
 3
 (68) 109
 397
 (69) 
 328
Gross property additions484
 4
 1
 43
 532
 16
 
 548
484
 40
 1
 4
 529
 19
 
 548
Predecessor – Year Ended December 31, 2015   
     
Operating revenues$3,049
 $835
 $202
 $55
 $4,141
 $11
 $(211) $3,941
Depreciation and
amortization
336
 25
 1
 18
 380
 17
 
 397
Operating income (loss)571
 152
 112
 (26) 809
 (63) 
 746
EBIT581
 152
 110
 (23) 820
 (59) 
 761
Gross property additions957
 7
 2
 27
 993
 34
 
 1,027
Predecessor – Total
assets at
December 31, 2015
12,519
 686
 935
 692
 14,832
 9,662
 (9,740) 14,754
(a)
Operating revenues for the three gas distribution operations dispositions were $244 million, $399 million, and $168 million for the successor years ended December 31, 2018 and 2017 and the successor period of July 1, 2016 through December 31, 2016, respectively, and $215 million for the predecessor period ended June 30, 2016. See Note 15 under "Southern Company Gas" for additional information.
(b)
Segment net income for gas distribution operations includes a gain on dispositions of $324 million ($16 million after tax) for the year ended December 31, 2018. Segment net income for gas marketing services includes a loss on disposition of $(33) million ($(67) million loss after tax) and a goodwill impairment charge of $42 million for the year ended December 31, 2018 recorded in contemplation of the sale of Pivotal Home Solutions. See Note 15 under "Southern Company Gas" for additional information.
(a)(c)The revenues for wholesale gas services are netted with costs associated with its energy and risk management activities. A reconciliation of operating revenues and intercompany revenues is shown in the following table.
Third Party Gross Revenues Intercompany Revenues Total Gross Revenues Less Gross Gas Costs Operating RevenuesThird Party Gross Revenues Intercompany Revenues Total Gross Revenues Less Gross Gas Costs Operating Revenues
(in millions)(in millions)
Successor – Year Ended
December 31, 2018
$6,955
 $451
 $7,406
 $7,262
 $144
Successor – Year Ended
December 31, 2017
$6,152
 $481
 $6,633
 $6,627
 $6
6,152
 481
 6,633
 6,627
 6
Successor – July 1, 2016 through
December 31, 2016
5,807
 333
 6,140
 6,116
 24
(in millions)
Successor – July 1, 2016 through
December 31, 2016
5,807
 333
 6,140
 6,116
 24
Predecessor – January 1, 2016 through
June 30, 2016
$2,500
 $143
 $2,643
 $2,675
 $(32)2,500
 143
 2,643
 2,675
 (32)
Predecessor – Year Ended December 31, 20156,286
 408
 6,694
 6,492
 202
(b)(d)
Operating revenues for the gas marketing services disposition were $55 million, $129 million, and $56 million for the successor years ended December 31, 2018 and 2017 and the successor period of July 1, 2016 through December 31, 2016, respectively, and $64 million for the predecessor period ended June 30, 2016 See Note 15 under "Southern Company Gas" for additional information.
(e)Includes the impact of the Tax Reform Legislation and new income tax apportionment factors in several states resulting from the Company'sSouthern Company Gas' inclusion in the consolidated Southern Company state tax filings.
    Table of Contents                                Index to Financial Statements

COMBINED NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)
Southern Company Gas and Subsidiary Companies 20172018 Annual Report


13.17. QUARTERLY FINANCIAL INFORMATION (UNAUDITED)
SummarizedThe tables below provide summarized quarterly financial information for the successor year ended December 31, 2017each registrant for 2018 and the successor period of July 1, 2016 through December 31, 2016 and for the predecessor period of January 1, 2016 through June 30, 2016 are as follows:2017. Each registrant's business is influenced by seasonal weather conditions.
Quarter EndedOperating
Revenues
 Operating
Income (Loss)
 EBIT Net Income (Loss) Attributable to Southern Company Gas
 (in millions)
Successor - 2017       
March 2017$1,560
 $391
 $435
 $239
June 2017716
 96
 128
 49
September 2017(a)
565
 68
 118
 15
December 2017(a)(b)
1,079
 110
 129
 (60)
Predecessor - January 1, 2016 through June 30, 2016(in millions)
March 2016$1,334
 $348
 $351
 $182
June 2016571
 (27) (23) (51)
Successor - July 1, 2016 through December 31, 2016(in millions)
September 2016$543
 $12
 $50
 $4
December 20161,109
 185
 221
 110
Quarter Ended
Southern Company(a)
Alabama Power
Georgia
Power(b)
Mississippi Power(c)
Southern Power(d)
Southern Company Gas(e)
 (in millions)
March 2018      
Operating Revenues$6,372
$1,473
$1,961
$302
$509
$1,639
Operating Income (Loss)1,376
372
513
7
60
388
Net Income (Loss)936
225
352
(7)115
279
Net Income (Loss) Attributable to Registrant938
225
352
(7)121
279
       
June 2018      
Operating Revenues$5,627
$1,503
$2,048
$297
$555
$730
Operating Income (Loss)63
380
(472)54
16
49
Net Income (Loss)(127)259
(396)46
45
(31)
Net Income (Loss) Attributable to Registrant(154)259
(396)46
22
(31)
       
September 2018      
Operating Revenues$6,159
$1,740
$2,593
$358
$635
$492
Operating Income (Loss)2,174
561
991
80
136
374
Net Income (Loss)1,222
373
664
47
146
46
Net Income (Loss) Attributable to Registrant1,164
373
664
47
92
46
       
December 2018      
Operating Revenues$5,337
$1,316
$1,818
$308
$506
$1,048
Operating Income (Loss)578
164
257
52
30
104
Net Income (Loss)269
73
173
149
(60)78
Net Income (Loss) Attributable to Registrant278
73
173
149
(48)78
(a)Net income (loss) attributable to Southern Company Gas includes the impact of new income tax apportionment factors in several states resulting from the Company's inclusion in the consolidated Southern Company state tax filings.See notes (b), (c), (d), and (e) below.
(b)Net
Georgia Power recorded an estimated probable loss attributableof $1.1 billion in the second quarter 2018 to reflect its revised estimate to complete construction and start-up of Plant Vogtle Units 3 and 4. See Note 2 under "Georgia PowerNuclear Construction" for additional information.
(c)
As a result of the abandonment and related closure activities for the mine and gasifier-related assets at the Kemper County energy facility, Mississippi Power recorded total pre-tax charges to income of $44 million ($33 million after tax) in the first quarter 2018, immaterial amounts in the second and third quarters 2018, and a pre-tax credit to income of $9 million in the fourth quarter 2018. In addition, Mississippi Power recorded a credit to earnings of $95 million in the fourth quarter 2018 primarily resulting from the reduction of a valuation allowance for a state income tax NOL carryforward associated with the Kemper County energy facility. See Note 2 under "Mississippi PowerKemper County Energy Facility" and Note 10 for additional information.
(d)
Southern CompanyPower recorded pre-tax impairment charges of $119 million ($89 million after tax) in the second quarter 2018 in contemplation of the sale of the Florida Plants and $36 million ($27 million after tax) in the third quarter 2018 related to wind turbine equipment. See Note 15 under "Southern PowerSales of Natural Gas includes the impactPlants" and " – Development Projects" for additional information. As a result of the Tax Reform Legislation.Legislation, Southern Power recorded income tax expense of $75 million in the fourth quarter 2018. See Note 10 for additional information.
(e)
Southern Company Gas recorded a goodwill impairment charge of $42 million in the first quarter 2018 in contemplation of the sale of Pivotal Home Solutions. Southern Company Gas also recorded gains (losses) on dispositions in the second, third, and fourth quarters 2018 of $(36) million pre-tax and $(76) million after tax, $353 million pre-tax and $40 million after tax, and $(27) million pre-tax and $(15) million after tax, respectively. See Note 15 under "Southern Company Gas" for additional information.

COMBINED NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)
Southern Company and Subsidiary Companies 2018 Annual Report

Quarter Ended
Southern
     Company(a)(b)(c)
Alabama Power
Georgia
Power
Mississippi Power(a)(b)
Southern Power(b)
Southern Company Gas(b)
 (in millions)
March 2017      
Operating Revenues$5,771
$1,382
$1,832
$272
$450
$1,560
Operating Income (Loss)1,252
361
483
(64)65
389
Net Income (Loss)665
174
260
(20)66
239
Net Income (Loss) Attributable to Registrant658
174
260
(20)70
239
       
June 2017      
Operating Revenues$5,430
$1,484
$2,048
$303
$529
$716
Operating Income (Loss)(1,649)440
621
(2,956)112
95
Net Income (Loss)(1,348)230
347
(2,054)104
49
Net Income (Loss) Attributable to Registrant(1,381)230
347
(2,054)82
49
       
September 2017      
Operating Revenues$6,201
$1,740
$2,546
$341
$618
$565
Operating Income (Loss)1,991
601
1,017
49
159
67
Net Income (Loss)1,109
325
580
40
154
15
Net Income (Loss) Attributable to Registrant1,069
325
580
40
124
15
       
December 2017      
Operating Revenues$5,629
$1,433
$1,884
$271
$478
$1,079
Operating Income (Loss)739
255
452
(180)32
109
Net Income (Loss)500
119
227
(556)793
(60)
Net Income (Loss) Attributable to Registrant496
119
227
(556)795
(60)
(a)
As a result of revisions to the cost estimate for the Kemper IGCC and the project's June 2017 suspension, Mississippi Power recorded total pre-tax charges to income related to the Kemper IGCC of $108 million ($67 million after tax) in the first quarter 2017, $3.0 billion ($2.1 billion after tax) in the second quarter 2017, $34 million ($21 million after tax) in the third quarter 2017, and $208 million ($185 million after tax) in the fourth quarter 2017. See Note 2 under "Mississippi PowerKemper County Energy Facility" for additional information.
(b)As a result of the Tax Reform Legislation, the Southern Company system recorded a total income tax benefit of $264 million in the fourth quarter 2017, comprised primarily of income tax expense of $372 million recorded at Mississippi Power, income tax benefit of $743 million recorded at Southern Power, and income tax expense of $93 million recorded at Southern Company Gas. See Note 10 for additional information.
(c)
Gulf Power recorded a pre-tax charge of $33 million ($20 million after tax) for the write-down of its ownership in Plant Scherer Unit 3 in the first quarter 2017. See Note 2 under "Southern CompanyGulf Power" for additional information.

COMBINED NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)
Southern Company and Subsidiary Companies 2018 Annual Report

Southern Company
The table below provides quarterly per share financial information for Southern Company common stock for 2018 and 2017.
 Per Common Share
 
Basic
Earnings
 Diluted Earnings  
Quarter EndedDividends
      
March 2018$0.93
 $0.92
 $0.5800
June 2018(0.15) (0.15) 0.6000
September 20181.14
 1.13
 0.6000
December 20180.27
 0.27
 0.6000
      
March 2017$0.66
 $0.66
 $0.5600
June 2017(1.38) (1.37) 0.5800
September 20171.07
 1.06
 0.5800
December 20170.49
 0.49
 0.5800

Item 9.CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE
None.
Item 9A.CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES
Disclosure Controls and Procedures.
As of the end of the period covered by this Annual Report on Form 10-K, Southern Company, Alabama Power, Georgia Power, Mississippi Power, Southern Power, and Southern Company Gas conducted separate evaluations under the supervision and with the participation of each company's management, including the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, of the effectiveness of the design and operation of the disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended). Based upon these evaluations, the Chief Executive Officer and the Chief Financial Officer, in each case, concluded that the disclosure controls and procedures are effective.
Internal Control Over Financial Reporting.
(a) Management's Annual Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting.
(b) Attestation Report of the Registered Public Accounting Firm.
The report of Deloitte & Touche LLP, Southern Company's businessindependent registered public accounting firm, regarding Southern Company's Internal Control over Financial Reporting is influenced by seasonal weather conditions.included in Item 8 herein of this Form 10-K. This report is not applicable to Alabama Power, Georgia Power, Mississippi Power, Southern Power, and Southern Company Gas as these companies are not accelerated filers or large accelerated filers.
See Note 11(c) Changes in internal control over financial reporting.
There have been no changes in Southern Company's, Alabama Power's, Georgia Power's, Mississippi Power's, Southern Power's, or Southern Company Gas' internal control over financial reporting (as such term is defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) under "Merger withthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended) during the fourth quarter 2018 that have materially affected or are reasonably likely to materially affect Southern Company" for information on the Merger.Company's, Alabama Power's, Georgia Power's, Mississippi Power's, Southern Power's, or Southern Company Gas' internal control over financial reporting.

    Table of Contents                                Index to Financial Statements

SELECTED CONSOLIDATEDMANAGEMENT'S REPORT ON INTERNAL CONTROL OVER FINANCIAL AND OPERATING DATA 2013-2017REPORTING
Southern Company and Subsidiary Companies 2018 Annual Report
The management of Southern Company is responsible for establishing and maintaining an adequate system of internal control over financial reporting as required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and as defined in Exchange Act Rule 13a-15(f). A control system can provide only reasonable, not absolute, assurance that the objectives of the control system are met.
Under management's supervision, an evaluation of the design and effectiveness of Southern Company's internal control over financial reporting was conducted based on the framework in Internal Control—Integrated Framework(2013) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission. Based on this evaluation, management concluded that Southern Company's internal control over financial reporting was effective as of December 31, 2018.
Deloitte & Touche LLP, as auditors of Southern Company's financial statements, has issued an attestation report on the effectiveness of Southern Company's internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2018, which is included herein.

/s/ Thomas A. Fanning
Thomas A. Fanning
Chairman, President, and Chief Executive Officer

/s/ Andrew W. Evans
Andrew W. Evans
Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
February 19, 2019


MANAGEMENT'S REPORT ON INTERNAL CONTROL OVER FINANCIAL REPORTING
Alabama Power Company 2018 Annual Report
The management of Alabama Power is responsible for establishing and maintaining an adequate system of internal control over financial reporting as required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and as defined in Exchange Act Rule 13a-15(f). A control system can provide only reasonable, not absolute, assurance that the objectives of the control system are met.
Under management's supervision, an evaluation of the design and effectiveness of Alabama Power's internal control over financial reporting was conducted based on the framework in Internal Control—Integrated Framework (2013) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission. Based on this evaluation, management concluded that Alabama Power's internal control over financial reporting was effective as of December 31, 2018.

/s/ Mark A. Crosswhite
Mark A. Crosswhite
Chairman, President, and Chief Executive Officer

/s/ Philip C. Raymond
Philip C. Raymond
Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer, and Treasurer
February 19, 2019


MANAGEMENT'S REPORT ON INTERNAL CONTROL OVER FINANCIAL REPORTING
Georgia Power Company 2018 Annual Report
The management of Georgia Power is responsible for establishing and maintaining an adequate system of internal control over financial reporting as required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and as defined in Exchange Act Rule 13a-15(f). A control system can provide only reasonable, not absolute, assurance that the objectives of the control system are met.
Under management's supervision, an evaluation of the design and effectiveness of Georgia Power's internal control over financial reporting was conducted based on the framework in Internal Control—Integrated Framework (2013) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission. Based on this evaluation, management concluded that Georgia Power's internal control over financial reporting was effective as of December 31, 2018.

/s/ W. Paul Bowers
W. Paul Bowers
Chairman, President, and Chief Executive Officer

/s/ Xia Liu
Xia Liu
Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer, and Treasurer
February 19, 2019


MANAGEMENT'S REPORT ON INTERNAL CONTROL OVER FINANCIAL REPORTING
Mississippi Power Company 2018 Annual Report
The management of Mississippi Power is responsible for establishing and maintaining an adequate system of internal control over financial reporting as required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and as defined in Exchange Act Rule 13a-15(f). A control system can provide only reasonable, not absolute, assurance that the objectives of the control system are met.
Under management's supervision, an evaluation of the design and effectiveness of Mississippi Power's internal control over financial reporting was conducted based on the framework in Internal Control—Integrated Framework (2013) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission. Based on this evaluation, management concluded that Mississippi Power's internal control over financial reporting was effective as of December 31, 2018.

/s/ Anthony L. Wilson
Anthony L. Wilson
Chairman, President, and Chief Executive Officer

/s/ Moses H. Feagin
Moses H. Feagin
Vice President, Chief Financial Officer, and Treasurer
February 19, 2019


MANAGEMENT'S REPORT ON INTERNAL CONTROL OVER FINANCIAL REPORTING
Southern Power Company and Subsidiary Companies 2018 Annual Report
The management of Southern Power is responsible for establishing and maintaining an adequate system of internal control over financial reporting as required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and as defined in Exchange Act Rule 13a-15(f). A control system can provide only reasonable, not absolute, assurance that the objectives of the control system are met.
Under management's supervision, an evaluation of the design and effectiveness of Southern Power's internal control over financial reporting was conducted based on the framework in Internal Control—Integrated Framework (2013) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission. Based on this evaluation, management concluded that Southern Power's internal control over financial reporting was effective as of December 31, 2018.

/s/ Mark S. Lantrip
Mark S. Lantrip
Chairman, President, and Chief Executive Officer

/s/ William C. Grantham
William C. Grantham
Senior Vice President, Chief Financial Officer, and Treasurer
February 19, 2019


MANAGEMENT'S REPORT ON INTERNAL CONTROL OVER FINANCIAL REPORTING
Southern Company Gas and Subsidiary Companies 20172018 Annual Report
The management of Southern Company Gas is responsible for establishing and maintaining an adequate system of internal control over financial reporting as required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and as defined in Exchange Act Rule 13a-15(f). A control system can provide only reasonable, not absolute, assurance that the objectives of the control system are met.
Under management's supervision, an evaluation of the design and effectiveness of Southern Company Gas' internal control over financial reporting was conducted based on the framework in Internal Control—Integrated Framework (2013) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission. Based on this evaluation, management concluded that Southern Company Gas' internal control over financial reporting was effective as of December 31, 2018.

/s/ Kimberly S. Greene
Kimberly S. Greene
Chairman, President, and Chief Executive Officer

/s/ Daniel S. Tucker
Daniel S. Tucker
Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer, and Treasurer
February 19, 2019
 Successor  Predecessor
 2017 July 1, 2016 through December 31, 2016  January 1, 2016 through June 30, 2016 2015 2014 2013
Operating Revenues (in millions)$3,920
 $1,652
  $1,905
 $3,941
 $5,385
 $4,209
Net Income Attributable to
Southern Company Gas
(in millions)
$243
 $114
  $131
 $353
 $482
 $295
Cash Dividends on Common Stock
(in millions)
$443
 $126
  $128
 $244
 $233
 $222
Return on Average Common Equity
(percent)
2.68
 1.74
  3.31
 9.05
 12.96
 8.42
Total Assets (in millions)$22,987
 $21,853
  $14,488
 $14,754
 $14,888
 $14,528
Gross Property Additions
(in millions)
$1,525
 $632
  $548
 $1,027
 $769
 $731
Capitalization (in millions):            
Common stock equity$9,022
 $9,109
  $3,933
 $3,975
 $3,828
 $3,613
Long-term debt5,891
 5,259
  3,709
 3,275
 3,581
 3,791
Total (excluding amounts due within
one year)
$14,913
 $14,368
  $7,642
 $7,250
 $7,409
 $7,404
Capitalization Ratios (percent):            
Common stock equity60.5
 63.4
  51.5
 54.8
 51.7
 48.8
Long-term debt39.5
 36.6
  48.5
 45.2
 48.3
 51.2
Total (excluding amounts due within
one year)
100.0
 100.0
  100.0
 100.0
 100.0
 100.0
Service Contracts (period-end)1,184,257
 1,198,263
  1,197,096
 1,205,476
 1,162,065
 1,176,908
Customers (period-end)            
Gas distribution operations4,623,249
 4,586,477
  4,544,489
 4,557,729
 4,529,114
 4,504,067
Gas marketing services773,984
 655,999
  630,475
 654,475
 633,460
 632,337
Total (period-end)5,397,233
 5,242,476
  5,174,964
 5,212,204
 5,162,574
 5,136,404
Employees (period-end)5,318
 5,292
  5,284
 5,203
 5,165
 6,094

Item 9B.OTHER INFORMATION
Georgia Power is disclosing the information below in this Item 9B in lieu of filing a Current Report on Form 8-K.
Amendments to the Vogtle Joint Ownership Agreements
As previously reported, on September 26, 2018, Georgia Power entered into a binding term sheet with the other Vogtle Owners and MEAG's wholly-owned subsidiaries MEAG Power SPVJ, LLC (MEAG SPVJ), MEAG Power SPVM, LLC (MEAG SPVM), and MEAG Power SPVP, LLC (MEAG SPVP) to take certain actions which partially mitigate potential financial exposure for the other Vogtle Owners (Vogtle Owner Term Sheet).
On February 18, 2019, Georgia Power, the other Vogtle Owners, MEAG SPVJ, MEAG SPVM, and MEAG SPVP entered into certain amendments to the joint ownership agreements for Plant Vogtle Units 3 and 4 (Vogtle Joint Ownership Agreements) to implement the provisions of the Vogtle Owner Term Sheet (Global Amendments).
Pursuant to the Global Amendments, and consistent with the Vogtle Owner Term Sheet, the Vogtle Joint Ownership Agreements were modified as follows: (i) each Vogtle Owner must pay its proportionate share of qualifying construction costs for Plant Vogtle Units 3 and 4 based on its ownership percentage up to the estimated cost at completion (EAC) for Plant Vogtle Units 3 and 4 which formed the basis of Georgia Power's forecast of $8.4 billion in the nineteenth VCM plus $800 million; (ii) Georgia Power will be responsible for 55.7% of actual qualifying construction costs between $800 million and $1.6 billion over the EAC in the nineteenth VCM (resulting in $80 million of potential additional costs to Georgia Power), with the remaining Vogtle Owners responsible for 44.3% of such costs pro rata in accordance with their respective ownership interests; and (iii) Georgia Power will be responsible for 65.7% of qualifying construction costs between $1.6 billion and $2.1 billion over the EAC in the nineteenth VCM (resulting in a further $100 million of potential additional costs to Georgia Power), with the remaining Vogtle Owners responsible for 34.3% of such costs pro rata in accordance with their respective ownership interests.
If the EAC is revised and exceeds the EAC in the nineteenth VCM by more than $2.1 billion, each of the other Vogtle Owners will have a one-time option at the time the project budget forecast is so revised to tender a portion of its ownership interest to Georgia Power in exchange for Georgia Power's agreement to pay 100% of such Vogtle Owner's remaining share of total construction costs in excess of the EAC in the nineteenth VCM plus $2.1 billion. In this event, Georgia Power will have the option of cancelling the project in lieu of purchasing a portion of the ownership interest of any other Vogtle Owner. If Georgia Power accepts the offer to purchase a portion of another Vogtle Owner's ownership interest in Plant Vogtle Units 3 and 4, the ownership interest(s) to be conveyed from the tendering Vogtle Owner(s) to Georgia Power will be calculated based on the proportion of the cumulative amount of construction costs paid by each such tendering Vogtle Owner(s) and by Georgia Power as of the COD of Plant Vogtle Unit 4. For purposes of this calculation, payments made by Georgia Power on behalf of another Vogtle Owner in accordance with the second and third items described in the paragraph above will be treated as payments made by the applicable Vogtle Owner.
In the event the actual costs of construction at completion of a Unit are less than the EAC reflected in the nineteenth VCM report and such Unit is placed in service in accordance with the schedule projected in the nineteenth VCM report (i.e., Plant Vogtle Unit 3 is placed in service by November 2021 or Plant Vogtle Unit 4 is placed in service by November 2022), Georgia Power will be entitled to 60.7% of the cost savings with respect to the relevant Unit and the remaining Vogtle Owners will be entitled to 39.3% of such savings on a pro rata basis in accordance with their respective ownership interests.
For purposes of the foregoing provisions, qualifying construction costs will not include costs (i) resulting from force majeure events, including governmental actions or inactions (or significant delays associated with issuance of such actions) that affect the licensing, completion, start-up, operations, or financing of Plant Vogtle Units 3 and 4, administrative proceedings or litigation regarding ITAAC or other regulatory challenges to commencement of operation of Plant Vogtle Units 3 and 4, and changes in laws or regulations governing Plant Vogtle Units 3 and 4, (ii) legal fees and legal expenses incurred due to litigation with contractors or subcontractors that are not subsidiaries or affiliates of Southern Company, and (iii) additional costs caused by requests from the Vogtle Owners other than Georgia Power, except for the exercise of a right to vote granted under the Vogtle Joint Ownership Agreements, that increase costs by $100,000 or more.
Pursuant to the Global Amendments, and consistent with the Vogtle Owner Term Sheet, the provisions of the Vogtle Joint Ownership Agreements requiring that Vogtle Owners holding 90% of the ownership interests in Plant Vogtle Units 3 and 4 vote to continue construction following certain adverse events (Project Adverse Events) were also modified. In particular, an increase in the construction cost estimate for Plant Vogtle Units 3 and 4 no longer constitutes a Project Adverse Event and thus would no longer require a vote. In addition, the Project Adverse Event relating to disallowances of cost recovery by Georgia Power now excludes any additional amounts paid by Georgia Power on behalf of the other Vogtle Owners pursuant to the provisions of the Global Amendments described above and the first 6% of costs during any six-month VCM reporting period that are disallowed by the Georgia PSC for recovery, or for which Georgia Power elects not to seek cost recovery, through retail rates. Further, the Global Amendments provide that Georgia Power may cancel the project at any time in its sole discretion.
    Table of Contents                                Index to Financial Statements

SELECTED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL AND OPERATING DATA 2013-2017 (continued)The Global Amendments provide that if the holders of at least 90% of the ownership interests fail to vote in favor of continuing the project following any future Project Adverse Event, work on Plant Vogtle Units 3 and 4 will continue for a period of 30 days if the holders of more than 50% of the ownership interests vote in favor of continuing construction (Majority Voting Owners). In such a case, the Vogtle Owners (i) have agreed to negotiate in good faith towards the resumption of the project, (ii) if no agreement is reached during such 30-day period, the project will be cancelled, and (iii) in the event of such a cancellation, the Majority Voting Owners will be obligated to reimburse any other Vogtle Owner for the incremental costs it incurred during such 30-day negotiation period.
Southern Company GasPurchase of PTCs During Commercial Operation
Pursuant to the Global Amendments, and Subsidiary Companies 2017 Annual Report
 Successor  Predecessor
 2017 July 1, 2016 through December 31, 2016  January 1, 2016 through June 30, 2016 2015 2014 2013
Operating Revenues (in millions)            
Residential$2,100
 $899
  $1,101
 $2,129
 $2,877
 $2,422
Commercial641
 260
  310
 617
 861
 696
Transportation811
 269
  290
 526
 458
 487
Industrial159
 74
  72
 203
 242
 180
Other209
 150
  132
 466
 947
 424
Total$3,920
 $1,652
  $1,905
 $3,941
 $5,385
 $4,209
Heating Degree Days:            
Illinois5,246
 1,903
  3,340
 5,433
 6,556
 6,305
Georgia1,970
 727
  1,448
 2,204
 2,882
 2,689
Gas Sales Volumes
(mmBtu in millions):
            
Gas distributions operations            
Firm667
 274
  396
 695
 766
 720
Interruptible95
 47
  49
 99
 106
 111
Total762
 321
  445
 794
 872
 831
Gas marketing services            
Firm:            
Georgia23
 13
  21
 35
 41
 38
Illinois8
 4
  8
 13
 17
 9
Other emerging markets15
 5
  7
 11
 10
 8
Interruptible (large commercial and
industrial)
11
 6
  8
 14
 17
 18
Total57
 28
  44
 73
 85
 73
Market share in Georgia (percent)29.2
 29.4
  29.3
 29.7
 30.6
 31.4
Wholesale gas services            
Daily physical sales (mmBtu in
millions/day
)
6.4
 7.2
  7.6
 6.8
 6.3
 5.7

consistent with the Vogtle Owner Term Sheet, Georgia Power has agreed to purchase additional PTCs from OPC, Dalton, MEAG SPVM, MEAG SPVP, and MEAG SPVJ (to the extent any MEAG SPVJ PTC rights remain after any purchases required under Georgia Power's agreement with MEAG and MEAG SPVJ to provide funding with respect to MEAG SPVJ's ownership interest in Plant Vogtle Units 3 and 4 under certain circumstances) at varying purchase prices dependent upon the actual cost to complete construction of Plant Vogtle Units 3 and 4 as compared to the EAC reflected in the nineteenth VCM report. The purchases are at the option of the applicable Vogtle Owner. The purchases will occur during the month after such PTCs are earned and will be at the following purchase prices: (i) 88% of face value if the actual cost remains at or below the EAC projected in the nineteenth VCM report; (ii) 91% of face value if the actual cost increases by no more than $299 million over the EAC projected in the nineteenth VCM report; (iii) 95% of face value if the actual cost increases at least $300 million but less than $600 million over the EAC in the nineteenth VCM report; and (iv) 98% of face value if the actual cost increases by $600 million or more over the EAC in the nineteenth VCM report.
    Table of Contents                                Index to Financial Statements

PART III
Items 10 (other than the information under "Code of Ethics" below), 11, 12, 13, and 14 for Southern Company are incorporated by reference to Southern Company's Definitive Proxy Statement relating to the 20182019 Annual Meeting of Stockholders. Specifically, reference is made to "Corporate Governance at Southern Company" and "Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance" for Item 10, "Compensation Discussion and Analysis," "Executive Compensation Tables," and "Director Compensation" for Item 11, "Stock Ownership Information," "Executive Compensation Tables," and "Equity Compensation Plan Information" for Item 12, "Southern Company Board" for Item 13, and "Principal Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm Fees" for Item 14.
Items 10 (other than the information under "Code of Ethics" below), 11, 12, 13, and 14 for Alabama Power and Mississippi Power are incorporated by reference to the Definitive Information StatementsStatement of Alabama Power and Mississippi Power relating to each of their respective 2018its 2019 Annual MeetingsMeeting of Shareholders. Specifically, reference is made to "Nominees for Election as Directors," "Corporate Governance," and "Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance" for Item 10, "Executive Compensation," "Compensation Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation," "Director Compensation," "Director Deferred Compensation Plan," and "Director Compensation Table" for Item 11, "Stock Ownership Table" and "Executive Compensation" for Item 12, "Certain Relationships and Related Transactions" and "Director Independence" for Item 13, and "Principal Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm Fees" for Item 14.
Items 10, 11, 12, and 13 for each of Georgia Power, GulfMississippi Power, Southern Power, and Southern Company Gas are omitted pursuant to General Instruction I(2)(c) of Form 10-K. Item 14 for each of Georgia Power, GulfMississippi Power, Southern Power, and Southern Company Gas is contained herein.
ITEM 10.DIRECTORS, EXECUTIVE OFFICERS AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE
Code of Ethics
The registrants collectively have adopted a code of business conduct and ethics (Code of Ethics) that applies to each director, officer, and employee of the registrants and their subsidiaries. The Code of Ethics can be found on Southern Company's website located at www.southerncompany.com. The Code of Ethics is also available free of charge in print to any shareholder by requesting a copy from Myra C. Bierria, Corporate Secretary, Southern Company, 30 Ivan Allen Jr. Boulevard NW, Atlanta, Georgia 30308. Any amendment to or waiver from the Code of Ethics that applies to executive officers and directors will be posted on the website.

    Table of Contents                                Index to Financial Statements

ITEM 14.PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTANT FEES AND SERVICES
The following represents the fees billed to Georgia Power, GulfMississippi Power, Southern Power, and Southern Power for the last two fiscal yearsCompany Gas in 2018 and 2017 by Deloitte & Touche LLP, each company's principal public accountant for 2017 and 2016:accountant:
2017 20162018 2017
(in thousands)(in thousands)
Georgia Power      
Audit Fees (1)
$3,247
 $3,154
$3,605
 $3,247
Audit-Related Fees (2)
96
 30
31
 96
Tax Fees
 

 
All Other Fees (3)
1
 15
8
 1
Total$3,344
 $3,199
$3,644
 $3,344
Gulf Power   
Mississippi Power   
Audit Fees (1)
$1,442
 $1,346
$1,371
 $1,537
Audit-Related Fees3
 3
Audit-Related Fees (2)
79
 6
Tax Fees
 

 
All Other Fees (3)

 2

 8
Total$1,445
 $1,351
$1,450
 $1,551
Southern Power      
Audit Fees (1)
$1,778
 $1,817
$1,795
 $1,778
Audit-Related Fees439
 372
Audit-Related Fees(4)
1,017
 439
Tax Fees
 

 
All Other Fees (3)
8
 6
13
 8
Total$2,225
 $2,195
$2,825
 $2,225
Southern Company Gas   
Audit Fees (1)(5)
$3,622
 $4,449
Audit-Related Fees (6)
520
 579
Tax Fees
 
All Other Fees (3)(7)
7
 8
Total$4,149
 $5,036
(1)
(1)Includes services performed in connection with financing transactions.
(2) Includes both audit and non-statutory audit services in 2017 and non-statutory audit services in 2016.
(3) Represents registration fees for attendance at Deloitte & Touche LLP-sponsored education seminars.

The following represents the fees billed to Southern Company Gas for the last two fiscal years by PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, Southern Company Gas' principal public accountant through February 11, 2016, and Deloitte & Touche LLP, Southern Company Gas' principal public accountant since February 11, 2016:
 2017 2016
 (in thousands)
Southern Company Gas   
Audit Fees (1)
$4,449
 $5,131
Audit-Related Fees (2)
579
 59
Tax Fees (3)

 65
All Other Fees (4)
8
 7
Total$5,036
 $5,262
(1)Includes Deloitte & Touche LLP fees in connection with financing transactions and PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP and Deloitte & Touche LLP fees in connection with audits of several subsidiaries in addition to the consolidated audit.
(2)Represents fees for non-statutory audit services in 20172018 and a review report on internal controls provided to third parties billed by Deloitte & Touche LLP in 2017 and 2016.2017.
(3)Represents fees billed by Deloitte & Touche LLP for tax compliance services.
(4)Represents registration fees for attendance at Deloitte & Touche LLP-sponsored education seminarsseminars.
(4)Represents fees in connection with audits of Southern Power partnerships.
(5)Includes fees in connection with statutory audits of several Southern Company Gas subsidiaries.
(6)Represents fees for non-statutory audit services in 2018 and a review report on internal controls in 2018 and 2017.
(7)Includes subscription fees for Deloitte & Touche LLP's technical accounting research tool.tool in 2017.


The Southern Company Audit Committee (on behalf of Southern Company and its subsidiaries) adopted a Policy of Engagement of the Independent Auditor for Audit and Non-Audit Services that includes pre-approval requirements for such Audit Committee to pre-approvethe audit and non-audit services provided by Deloitte & Touche LLP. All of the audit services provided by Deloitte & Touche LLP in fiscal years 20172018 and 2016 (described in the footnotes to the table above)2017 and related fees were approved in advance by the Southern Company Audit Committee.

Prior to the closing of the Merger, the Southern Company Gas Audit Committee had responsibility for appointing, setting compensation, and overseeing the work of Southern Company Gas' independent registered public accounting firm. In recognition of this responsibility, Southern Company Gas' Audit Committee adopted a policy that required specific Audit Committee approval before any services were provided by the independent registered public accounting firm. All of the audit services provided by PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP and Deloitte & Touche LLP in fiscal year 2016 (described in the footnotes to the table above) prior to the closing of the Merger and related fees were approved in advance by the Southern Company Gas Audit Committee.
    Table of Contents                                Index to Financial Statements

PART IV
Item 15.EXHIBITS AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES
(a)The following documents are filed as a part of this report on Form 10-K:
(1)Financial Statements and Financial Statement Schedules:
Management's ReportReports on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting for Southern Company and Subsidiary Companies, is listed under Item 8 herein.
Management's Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting for Alabama Power, is listed under Item 8 herein.
Management's Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting for Georgia Power, is listed under Item 8 herein.
Management's Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting for Gulf Power is listed under Item 8 herein.
Management's Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting for Mississippi Power, is listed under Item 8 herein.
Management's Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting for Southern Power and Subsidiary Companies, is listed under Item 8 herein.
Management's Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting forand Southern Company Gas and Subsidiary Companies isare listed under Item 89A herein.
Reports of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm on the financial statements and financial statement schedules for Southern Company and Subsidiary Companies, Alabama Power Company, Georgia Power GulfCompany, Mississippi Power MississippiCompany, Southern Power Company and Subsidiary Companies, and Southern Company Gas and Subsidiary Companies, as well as the Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm on the financial statements of Southern Power and Subsidiary Companies are listed under Item 8 herein.
The financial statements filed as a part of this report for Southern Company and Subsidiary Companies, Alabama Power, Georgia Power, Gulf Power, Mississippi Power, Southern Power and Subsidiary Companies, and Southern Company Gas and Subsidiary Companies are listed under Item 8 herein.
Reports of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm on the financial statement schedules for Southern Company and Subsidiary Companies, Alabama Power Company, Georgia Power Company, Mississippi Power Company, Southern Power Company and Subsidiary Companies, and Southern Company Gas and Subsidiary Companies are listed in the Index to the Financial Statement Schedules at page S-1.
The financial statement schedules for Southern Company and Subsidiary Companies, Alabama Power, Georgia Power, GulfMississippi Power, MississippiSouthern Power and Subsidiary Companies, and Southern Company Gas and Subsidiary Companies are listed in the Index to the Financial Statement Schedules at page S-1.
The financial statements of Southern Natural Gas Company, L.L.C. as of December 31, 20172018 and 20162017 and for the yearyears ended December 31, 2018 and 2017 and the four months ended December 31, 2016 are provided by Southern Company Gas as separate financial statements of subsidiaries not consolidated pursuant to Rule 3-09 of Regulation S-X, and are incorporated by reference herein from Exhibit 99(g) hereto.
(2)Exhibits:
Exhibits for Southern Company, Alabama Power, Georgia Power, Gulf Power, Mississippi Power, Southern Power, and Southern Company Gas are listed in the Exhibit Index at page E-1.

Item 16. FORM 10-K SUMMARY

None.


    Table of Contents                                Index to Financial Statements

REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
To the stockholders and the Board of Directors of The Southern Company and Subsidiary Companies
Opinion on the Financial Statement Schedule
We have audited the consolidated financial statements of Southern Company and Subsidiary Companies (the Company) as of December 31, 2017 and 2016, and for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2017, and the Company's internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2017, and have issued our report thereon dated February 20, 2018; such report is included elsewhere in this Form 10-K. Our audits also included the consolidated financial statement schedule of the Company (page S-2) listed in the Index at Item 15. This consolidated financial statement schedule is the responsibility of the Company's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion based on our audits. In our opinion, such consolidated financial statement schedule, when considered in relation to the financial statements taken as a whole, presents fairly, in all material respects, the information set forth therein.
/s/ Deloitte & Touche LLP
Atlanta, Georgia
February 20, 2018


REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
To the stockholders and the Board of Directors of Alabama Power Company
Opinion on the Financial Statement Schedule
We have audited the financial statements of Alabama Power Company (the Company) (a wholly-owned subsidiary of The Southern Company) as of December 31, 2017 and 2016, and for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2017, and have issued our report thereon dated February 20, 2018; such report is included elsewhere in this Form 10-K. Our audits also included the financial statement schedule of the Company (Page S-3) listed in the Index at Item 15. This financial statement schedule is the responsibility of the Company's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion based on our audits. In our opinion, such financial statement schedule, when considered in relation to the financial statements taken as a whole, presents fairly, in all material respects, the information set forth therein.
/s/ Deloitte & Touche LLP
Birmingham, Alabama
February 20, 2018


REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
To the stockholder and the Board of Directors of Georgia Power Company
Opinion on the Financial Statement Schedule
We have audited the financial statements of Georgia Power Company (the Company) (a wholly-owned subsidiary of The Southern Company) as of December 31, 2017 and 2016, and for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2017, and have issued our report thereon dated February 20, 2018; such report is included elsewhere in this Form 10-K. Our audits also included the financial statement schedule of the Company (Page S-4) listed in the Index at Item 15. This financial statement schedule is the responsibility of the Company's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion based on our audits. In our opinion, such financial statement schedule, when considered in relation to the financial statements taken as a whole, presents fairly, in all material respects, the information set forth therein.
/s/ Deloitte & Touche LLP
Atlanta, Georgia
February 20, 2018


REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
To the stockholder and the Board of Directors of Gulf Power Company
Opinion on the Financial Statement Schedule
We have audited the financial statements of Gulf Power Company (the Company) (a wholly-owned subsidiary of The Southern Company) as of December 31, 2017 and 2016, and for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2017, and have issued our report thereon dated February 20, 2018; such report is included elsewhere in this Form 10-K. Our audits also included the financial statement schedule of the Company (Page S-5) listed in the Index at Item 15. This financial statement schedule is the responsibility of the Company's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Company's financial statement schedule based on our audits. In our opinion, such financial statement schedule, when considered in relation to the financial statements taken as a whole, presents fairly, in all material respects, the information set forth therein.
/s/ Deloitte & Touche LLP
Atlanta, Georgia
February 20, 2018


REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
To the stockholders and the Board of Directors of Mississippi Power Company
Opinion on the Financial Statement Schedule
We have audited the financial statements of Mississippi Power Company (the Company) (a wholly-owned subsidiary of The Southern Company) as of December 31, 2017 and 2016, and for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2017, and have issued our report thereon dated February 20, 2018; such report is included elsewhere in this Form 10-K. Our audits also included the financial statement schedule of the Company (Page S-6) listed in the Index at Item 15. This financial statement schedule is the responsibility of the Company's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion based on our audits. In our opinion, such financial statement schedule, when considered in relation to the financial statements taken as a whole, presents fairly, in all material respects, the information set forth therein.
/s/ Deloitte & Touche LLP
Atlanta, Georgia
February 20, 2018



REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
To the stockholder and the Board of Directors of Southern Company Gas and Subsidiary Companies
Opinion on the Financial Statement Schedule
We have audited the consolidated financial statements of Southern Company Gas and Subsidiary Companies (the Company) (a wholly-owned subsidiary of The Southern Company) as of December 31, 2017 and 2016, and the related consolidated statements of income, comprehensive income, stockholders' equity, and cash flows, for the year ended December 31, 2017 and the six-month periods ended June 30, 2016 (Predecessor) and December 31, 2016 (Successor), and have issued our report thereon dated February 20, 2018; such report is included elsewhere in this Form 10-K. As indicated in that report, we did not audit the financial statements of Southern Natural Gas Company, L.L.C. (SNG), the Company's investment in which is accounted for by the use of the equity method. The Company's consolidated financial statements include its equity investment in SNG of $1,262 million and $1,394 million as of December 31, 2017 and December 31, 2016, respectively, and its earnings from its equity method investment in SNG of $88 million and $56 million for the year ended December 31, 2017 and the six months ended December 31, 2016, respectively. Those statements were audited by other auditors whose report (which expresses an unqualified opinion on SNG's financial statements and contains an emphasis of matter paragraph concerning the extent of its operations and relationships with affiliated entities) have been furnished to us, and our opinion, insofar as it relates to the amounts included for SNG, is based solely on the report of the other auditors. Our audits also included the consolidated financial statement schedule of the Company (Page S-7) listed in the Index at Item 15. This consolidated financial statement schedule is the responsibility of the Company's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion based on our audits. In our opinion, such consolidated financial statement schedule, when considered in relation to the financial statements taken as a whole, presents fairly, in all material respects, the information set forth therein.
/s/ Deloitte & Touche LLP
Atlanta, Georgia
February 20, 2018


INDEX TO FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES
Schedules I through V not listed above are omitted as not applicable or not required. A Schedule II for Southern Power Company and Subsidiary Companies is not being provided because there were no reportable items for the three-year period ended December 31, 2017. Columns omitted from schedules filed have been omitted because the information is not applicable or not required.

REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
To the stockholders and the Board of Directors of The Southern Company and Subsidiary Companies
Opinion on the Financial Statement Schedule
We have audited the consolidated financial statements of The Southern Company and subsidiary companies (Southern Company) as of December 31, 2018 and 2017, and for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2018, and Southern Company's internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2018, and have issued our report thereon dated February 19, 2019; such report is included elsewhere in this Form 10-K. Our audits also included the financial statement schedule of Southern Company (Page S-8) listed in the Index at Item 15. This financial statement schedule is the responsibility of Southern Company's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion based on our audits. In our opinion, such financial statement schedule, when considered in relation to the financial statements taken as a whole, presents fairly, in all material respects, the information set forth therein.
/s/ Deloitte & Touche LLP
Atlanta, Georgia
February 19, 2019


REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
To the stockholders and the Board of Directors of Alabama Power Company
Opinion on the Financial Statement Schedule
We have audited the financial statements of Alabama Power Company (Alabama Power) (a wholly-owned subsidiary of The Southern Company) as of December 31, 2018 and 2017, and for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2018, and have issued our report thereon dated February 19, 2019; such report is included elsewhere in this Form 10-K. Our audits also included the financial statement schedule of Alabama Power (Page S-9) listed in the Index at Item 15. This financial statement schedule is the responsibility of Alabama Power's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion based on our audits. In our opinion, such financial statement schedule, when considered in relation to the financial statements taken as a whole, presents fairly, in all material respects, the information set forth therein.
/s/ Deloitte & Touche LLP
Birmingham, Alabama
February 19, 2019


REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
To the stockholder and the Board of Directors of Georgia Power Company
Opinion on the Financial Statement Schedule
We have audited the financial statements of Georgia Power Company (Georgia Power) (a wholly-owned subsidiary of The Southern Company) as of December 31, 2018 and 2017, and for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2018, and have issued our report thereon dated February 19, 2019; such report is included elsewhere in this Form 10-K. Our audits also included the financial statement schedule of Georgia Power (Page S-10) listed in the Index at Item 15. This financial statement schedule is the responsibility of Georgia Power's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion based on our audits. In our opinion, such financial statement schedule, when considered in relation to the financial statements taken as a whole, presents fairly, in all material respects, the information set forth therein.
/s/ Deloitte & Touche LLP
Atlanta, Georgia
February 19, 2019


REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
To the stockholders and the Board of Directors of Mississippi Power Company
Opinion on the Financial Statement Schedule
We have audited the financial statements of Mississippi Power Company (Mississippi Power) (a wholly-owned subsidiary of The Southern Company) as of December 31, 2018 and 2017, and for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2018, and have issued our report thereon dated February 19, 2019; such report is included elsewhere in this Form 10-K. Our audits also included the financial statement schedule of Mississippi Power (Page S-11) listed in the Index at Item 15. This financial statement schedule is the responsibility of Mississippi Power's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion based on our audits. In our opinion, such financial statement schedule, when considered in relation to the financial statements taken as a whole, presents fairly, in all material respects, the information set forth therein.
/s/ Deloitte & Touche LLP
Atlanta, Georgia
February 19, 2019



REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
To the stockholder and the Board of Directors of Southern Power Company and Subsidiary Companies
Opinion on the Financial Statement Schedule
We have audited the consolidated financial statements of Southern Power Company and subsidiary companies (Southern Power) (a wholly-owned subsidiary of The Southern Company) as of December 31, 2018 and 2017, and for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2018, and have issued our report thereon dated February 19, 2019; such report is included elsewhere in this Form 10-K. Our audits also included the financial statement schedule of Southern Power (Page S-12) listed in the Index at Item 15. This financial statement schedule is the responsibility of Southern Power's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion based on our audits. In our opinion, such financial statement schedule, when considered in relation to the financial statements taken as a whole, presents fairly, in all material respects, the information set forth therein.
/s/ Deloitte & Touche LLP
Atlanta, Georgia
February 19, 2019


REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
To the stockholder and the Board of Directors of Southern Company Gas and Subsidiary Companies
Opinion on the Financial Statement Schedule
We have audited the consolidated financial statements of Southern Company Gas and subsidiary companies (Southern Company Gas) (a wholly-owned subsidiary of The Southern Company) as of December 31, 2018 and 2017, and the six-month periods ended June 30, 2016 (Predecessor) and December 31, 2016 (Successor), and have issued our report thereon dated February 19, 2019; such report is included elsewhere in this Form 10-K. As indicated in that report, we did not audit the financial statements of Southern Natural Gas Company, L.L.C. (SNG), Southern Company Gas' investment in which is accounted for by the use of the equity method. Southern Company Gas' financial statements include its equity investment in SNG of $1,261 million and $1,262 million as of December 31, 2018 and December 31, 2017, respectively, and its earnings from its equity method investment in SNG of $131 million, $88 million, and $56 million for the years ended December 31, 2018 and 2017 and the six months ended December 31, 2016, respectively. Those statements were audited by other auditors whose report (which expresses an unqualified opinion on SNG's financial statements and contains an emphasis of matter paragraph concerning the extent of its operations and relationships with affiliated entities) have been furnished to us, and our opinion, insofar as it relates to the amounts included for SNG, is based solely on the report of the other auditors. Our audits also included the financial statement schedule of Southern Company Gas (Page S-13) listed in the Index at Item 15. This financial statement schedule is the responsibility of Southern Company Gas' management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion based on our audits. In our opinion, such financial statement schedule, when considered in relation to the financial statements taken as a whole, presents fairly, in all material respects, the information set forth therein.
/s/ Deloitte & Touche LLP
Atlanta, Georgia
February 19, 2019

    Table of Contents                                Index to Financial Statements

THE SOUTHERN COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARY COMPANIES
SCHEDULE II — VALUATION AND QUALIFYING ACCOUNTS
FOR THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 20172018, 20162017, AND 20152016
(Stated in ThousandsMillions of Dollars)
  Additions      Additions      
DescriptionBalance at Beginning of Period Charged to Income Charged to Other Accounts Acquisitions Deductions (Note) Balance at End of PeriodBalance at Beginning of Period Charged to Income Charged to Other Accounts Acquisitions Deductions 
Reclassified to Held for Sale(c)
 Balance at End of Period
Provision for uncollectible accounts(a)                        
2018$44
 $69
 $(1) $
 $61
 $1
 $50
2017$43,429
 $55,770
 $(248) $30
 $54,605
 $44,376
43
 56
 
 
 55
 
 44
201613,341
 39,959
 (1,257) 40,629
 49,243
 43,429
13
 40
 (1) 41
 50
 
 43
201518,253
 31,074
 
 
 35,986
 13,341
Tax valuation allowance (net state)(b)
             
2018$148
 $(38) $
 $
 $10
 $
 $100
201722
 126
 
 
 
 
 148
20162
 
 
 20
 
 
 22
(Note)
(a)Deductions represent write-offs of accounts considered to be uncollectible, less recoveries of amounts previously written off.
(b)In 2017, Mississippi Power established a valuation allowance for the State of Mississippi net operating loss carryforward expected to expire prior to being fully utilized. This valuation allowance was reduced in 2018 as a result of higher projected state taxable income. In 2018, Georgia Power established a valuation allowance for certain Georgia state tax credits expected to expire prior to being fully utilized, as a result of lower projected state taxable income. See Note 10 to the financial statements in Item 8 herein for additional information.
(c)
Represents provision for uncollectible accounts at Gulf Power presented on Southern Company's balance sheet at December 31, 2018 as assets held for sale, current. See Note 15 to the financial statements under "Southern Company's Sale of Gulf Power" and "Assets Held for Sale" in Item 8 herein for additional information.    Represents write-off of accounts considered to be uncollectible, less recoveries of amounts previously written off.

    Table of Contents                                Index to Financial Statements

ALABAMA POWER COMPANY
SCHEDULE II — VALUATION AND QUALIFYING ACCOUNTS
FOR THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 20172018, 20162017, AND 20152016
(Stated in ThousandsMillions of Dollars)
  Additions      Additions    
Description
Balance at Beginning
of Period
 
Charged to
Income
 Charged to Other Accounts 
Deductions
(Note)
 
Balance at
End of Period
Balance at Beginning
of Period
 
Charged to
Income
 Charged to Other Accounts 
Deductions(*)
 
Balance at
End of Period
Provision for uncollectible accounts                  
2018$9
 $13
 $
 $12
 $10
2017$10,487
 $9,367
 $
 $11,075
 $8,779
10
 10
 
 11
 9
20169,597
 11,310
 
 10,420
 10,487
10
 11
 
 11
 10
20159,143
 13,500
 
 13,046
 9,597
(Note)    Represents write-off of accounts considered to be uncollectible, less recoveries of amounts previously written off.
(*)Deductions represent write-offs of accounts considered to be uncollectible, less recoveries of amounts previously written off.
    Table of Contents                                Index to Financial Statements

GEORGIA POWER COMPANY
SCHEDULE II — VALUATION AND QUALIFYING ACCOUNTS
FOR THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 20172018, 20162017, AND 20152016
(Stated in ThousandsMillions of Dollars)
  Additions      Additions    
Description
Balance at Beginning
of Period
 
Charged to
Income
 
Charged to Other
Accounts
 
Deductions
(Note)
 Balance at End of Period
Balance at Beginning
of Period
 
Charged to
Income
 
Charged to Other
Accounts
 Deductions Balance at End of Period
Provision for uncollectible accounts(a)                  
2018$3
 $11
 $
 $12
 $2
2017$2,836
 $11,250
 $
 $11,474
 $2,612
3
 11
 
 11
 3
20162,147
 14,476
 
 13,787
 2,836
2
 15
 
 14
 3
20156,076
 16,862
 
 20,791
 2,147
Tax valuation allowance (net state)(b)
         
2018$
 $39
 $
 $6
 $33
2017
 
 
 
 
2016
 
 
 
 
(Note)    Represents write-off of accounts considered to be uncollectible, less recoveries of amounts previously written off.


GULF POWER COMPANY
SCHEDULE II — VALUATION AND QUALIFYING ACCOUNTS
FOR THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2017, 2016, AND 2015
(Stated in Thousands of Dollars)
   Additions    
Description
Balance at Beginning
of Period
 
Charged to
Income
 
Charged to Other
Accounts
 
Deductions
(Note)
 Balance at End of Period
Provision for uncollectible accounts         
2017$732
 $2,859
 $
 $2,846
 $745
2016775
 2,946
 
 2,989
 732
20152,087
 2,041
 
 3,353
 775
(Note)    Represents write-off of accounts considered to be uncollectible, less recoveries of amounts previously written off.
(a)Deductions represent write-offs of accounts considered to be uncollectible, less recoveries of amounts previously written off.
(b)In 2018, Georgia Power established a valuation allowance for certain Georgia state tax credits expected to expire prior to being fully utilized, as a result of lower projected state taxable income. See Note 10 to the financial statements in Item 8 herein for additional information.

    Table of Contents                                Index to Financial Statements

MISSISSIPPI POWER COMPANY
SCHEDULE II — VALUATION AND QUALIFYING ACCOUNTS
FOR THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 20172018, 20162017, AND 20152016
(Stated in ThousandsMillions of Dollars)
   Additions    
Description
Balance at Beginning
of Period
 
Charged to
Income
 
Charged to Other
Accounts
 
Deductions
(Note)
 Balance at End of Period
Provision for uncollectible accounts         
2017$494
 $1,377
 $
 $1,279
 $592
2016287
 1,295
 
 1,088
 494
2015(*)825
 (1,994) 
 (1,456) 287
(Note)    Represents write-off of accounts considered to be uncollectible, less recoveries of amounts previously written off.

   Additions    
Description
Balance at Beginning
of Period
 
Charged to
Income
 
Charged to Other
Accounts
 Deductions Balance at End of Period
Provision for uncollectible accounts(a)
         
2018$1
 $1
 $
 $1
 $1
2017
 2
 
 1
 1
2016
 1
 
 1
 
Tax valuation allowance (net state)(b)
         
2018$124
 $(92) $
 $
 $32
2017
 124
 
 
 124
2016
 
 
 
 
(*)(a)The refund ordered by the Mississippi PSC pursuantDeductions represent write-offs of accounts considered to the 2015 Mississippi Supreme Court decision relative to a regulatory liability used by Mississippi Power to record financing costs associated with constructionbe uncollectible, less recoveries of the Kemper County energy facility involved refunding all billed amounts to all historical customers and included an interest component. The refund of approximately $371 million in 2015 was of sufficient magnitude to resolve most past due amounts beyond 30 days aged receivables, accounting for the negative provision of $(2.0) million where risk of collectibility was offset by applying the refund to past due amounts. It was also of sufficient size to offset amounts previously written off in the 2012-2015 time frame, accountingoff.
(b)In 2017, Mississippi Power established a valuation allowance for the State of Mississippi net recoveriesoperating loss carryforward expected to expire prior to being fully utilized. This valuation allowance was reduced in 2018 as a result of $1.5 million.higher projected state taxable income. See Note 10 to the financial statements in Item 8 herein for additional information.
    Table of Contents                                Index to Financial Statements

SOUTHERN POWER COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARY COMPANIES
SCHEDULE II — VALUATION AND QUALIFYING ACCOUNTS
FOR THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2018, 2017, AND 2016
(Stated in Millions of Dollars)
   Additions    
Description
Balance at Beginning
of Period
 
Charged to
Income
 
Charged to Other
Accounts
 Deductions Balance at End of Period
Tax valuation allowance (net state)         
2018$10
 $12
 $
 $
 $22
2017
 10
 
 
 10
2016
 
 
 
 



SOUTHERN COMPANY GAS AND SUBSIDIARY COMPANIES
SCHEDULE II — VALUATION AND QUALIFYING ACCOUNTS
FOR THE SUCCESSOR PERIODS OF JULY 1, 2016 THROUGH DECEMBER 31, 2016
AND THE YEARYEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2018 AND 2017
AND THE PREDECESSOR PERIODSPERIOD OF JANUARY 1, 2016 THROUGH JUNE 30, 2016
AND THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2015
(Stated in ThousandsMillions of Dollars)
   Additions    
Description
Balance at Beginning
of Period
 
Charged to
Income
 Charged to Other Accounts 
Deductions
(Note)
 
Balance at
End of Period
Successor – December 31, 2017         
Provision for uncollectible accounts$27,316
 $28,022
 $(248) $27,286
 $27,804
Income tax valuation19,182
 
 
 7,910
 11,272
Successor – December 31, 2016         
Provision for uncollectible accounts$37,663
 $9,500
 $(1,257) $18,590
 $27,316
Income tax valuation19,182
 
 
 
 19,182
Predecessor – June 30, 2016         
Provision for uncollectible accounts$29,142
 $15,976
 $1,608
 $9,063
 $37,663
Income tax valuation19,182
 
 
 
 19,182
Predecessor – 2015         
Provision for uncollectible accounts$35,069
 $27,050
 $3,017
 $35,994
 $29,142
Income tax valuation19,637
 
 
 455
 19,182
   Additions    
Description
Balance at Beginning
of Period
 
Charged to
Income
 Charged to Other Accounts Deductions 
Balance at
End of Period
Successor – December 31, 2018         
Provision for uncollectible accounts(*)
$28
 $33
 $(1) $30
 $30
Income tax valuation allowance (net state)11
 1
 
 
 12
Successor – December 31, 2017         
Provision for uncollectible accounts(*)
$27
 $28
 $
 $27
 $28
Income tax valuation allowance (net state)19
 
 
 8
 11
Successor – December 31, 2016         
Provision for uncollectible accounts(*)
$38
 $9
 $(1) $19
 $27
Income tax valuation allowance (net state)19
 
 
 
 19
Predecessor – June 30, 2016         
Provision for uncollectible accounts(*)
$29
 $16
 $2
 $9
 $38
Income tax valuation allowance (net state)19
 
 
 
 19
(Note)    Represents write-off of accounts considered to be uncollectible, less recoveries of amounts previously written off.
(*)Deductions represent write-offs of accounts considered to be uncollectible, less recoveries of amounts previously written off.

    Table of Contents                                Index to Financial Statements

EXHIBIT INDEX
The exhibits below with an asterisk (*) preceding the exhibit number are filed herewith. The remaining exhibits have previously been filed with the SEC and are incorporated herein by reference. The exhibits marked with a pound sign (#) are management contracts or compensatory plans or arrangements required to be identified as such by Item 15 of Form 10-K.
(2) Plan of acquisition, reorganization, arrangement, liquidation or succession
  Southern Company
   (a) 1  
Agreement and Plan of Merger by and among Southern Company, AMS Corp., and Southern Company Gas, dated August 23, 2015. (Designated in Form 8-K dated August 23, 2015, File No. 1-3526, as Exhibit 2.1.)
  (a)2
Stock Purchase Agreement, dated as of May 20, 2018, by and among Southern Company, 700 Universe, LLC, and NextEra Energy. (Designated in Form 8-K dated May 23, 2018, File No. 1-3526, as Exhibit 2(a)1.)
*(a)3
(a)4
Stock Purchase Agreement, dated as of May 20, 2018, by and among Southern Company Gas, NUI Corporation, 700 Universe, LLC, and NextEra Energy. (Designated in Form 8-K dated May 23, 2018, File No. 1-3526, as Exhibit 2(a)2.)
(a)5
Equity Interest Purchase Agreement, dated as of May 20, 2018, by and among Southern Power Company, 700 Universe, LLC, and NextEra Energy. (Designated in Form 8-K dated May 23, 2018, File No. 1-3526, as Exhibit 2(a)3.)
Southern Power
(e)1Equity Interest Purchase Agreement, dated as of May 20, 2018, by and among Southern Power Company, 700 Universe, LLC, and NextEra Energy. See Exhibit 2(a)5 herein.
Southern Company Gas
   (g)(f) 1  Agreement and Plan of Merger by and among Southern Company, AMS Corp., and Southern Company Gas, dated August 23, 2015. See Exhibit 2(a)1 herein.
   (g)(f) 2  
Purchase and Sale Agreement, dated as of July 10, 2016, among Kinder Morgan SNG Operator LLC, Southern Natural Gas Company, L.L.C., and Southern Company.(Designated in Form 8-K dated August 31, 2016, File No. 1-14174, as Exhibit 2.1a.)
   (g)(f) 3  
Assignment, Assumption and Novation of Purchase and Sale Agreement, dated as of August 31, 2016, between Southern Company and Evergreen Enterprise Holdings LLC. (Designated in Form 8-K dated August 31, 2016, File No. 1-14174, as Exhibit 2.1b.)
          
(3) Articles of Incorporation and By-Laws
  Southern Company
  *(a) 1  
   (a) 2  
By-laws of Southern Company as amended effective May 25, 2016, and as presently in effect. (Designated in Form 8-K dated May 25, 2016, File No. 1-3526, as Exhibit 3.2.)
  Alabama Power
   (b) 1  
Charter of Alabama Power and amendments thereto through September 7, 2017. (Designated in Registration Nos. 2-59634 as Exhibit 2(b), 2-60209 as Exhibit 2(c), 2-60484 as Exhibit 2(b), 2-70838 as Exhibit 4(a)-2, 2-85987 as Exhibit 4(a)-2, 33-25539 as Exhibit 4(a)-2, 33-43917 as Exhibit 4(a)-2, in Form 8-K dated February 5, 1992, File No. 1-3164, as Exhibit 4(b)-3, in Form 8-K dated July 8, 1992, File No. 1-3164, as Exhibit 4(b)-3, in Form 8-K dated October 27, 1993, File No. 1-3164, as Exhibits 4(a) and 4(b), in Form 8-K dated November 16, 1993, File No. 1-3164, as Exhibit 4(a), in Certificate of Notification, File No. 70-8191, as Exhibit A, in Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 1997, File No. 1-3164, as Exhibit 3(b)2, in Form 8-K dated August 10, 1998, File No. 1-3164, as Exhibit 4.4, in Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2000, File No. 1-3164, as Exhibit 3(b)2, in Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2001, File No. 1-3164, as Exhibit 3(b)2, in Form 8-K dated February 5, 2003, File No. 1-3164, as Exhibit 4.4, in Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2003, File No 1-3164, as Exhibit 3(b)1, in Form 8-K dated February 5, 2004, File No. 1-3164, as Exhibit 4.4, in Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2006, File No. 1-3164, as Exhibit 3(b)(1), in Form 8-K dated December 5, 2006, File No. 1-3164, as Exhibit 4.2, in Form 8-K dated September 12, 2007, File No. 1-3164, as Exhibit 4.5, in Form 8-K dated October 17, 2007, File No. 1-3164, as Exhibit 4.5, in Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2008, File No. 1-3164, as Exhibit 3(b)1, and in Form 8-K dated September 5, 2017, File No. 1-3164, as Exhibit 4.1.)

   (b) 2  
Amended and Restated By-laws of Alabama Power effective February 10, 2014, and as presently in effect. (Designated in Form 8-K dated February 10, 2014, File No 1-3164, as Exhibit 3.1.)

  Georgia Power
   (c) 1  
Charter of Georgia Power and amendments thereto through October 9, 2007. (Designated in Registration Nos. 2-63392 as Exhibit 2(a)-2, 2-78913 as Exhibits 4(a)-(2) and 4(a)-(3), 2-93039 as Exhibit 4(a)-(2), 2-96810 as Exhibit 4(a)-2, 33-141 as Exhibit 4(a)-(2), 33-1359 as Exhibit 4(a)(2), 33-5405 as Exhibit 4(b)(2), 33-14367 as Exhibits 4(b)-(2) and 4(b)-(3), 33-22504 as Exhibits 4(b)-(2), 4(b)-(3) and 4(b)-(4), in Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 1991, File No. 1-6468, as Exhibits 4(a)(2) and 4(a)(3), in Registration No. 33-48895 as Exhibits 4(b)-(2) and 4(b)-(3), in Form 8-K dated December 10, 1992, File No. 1-6468 as Exhibit 4(b), in Form 8-K dated June 17, 1993, File No. 1-6468, as Exhibit 4(b), in Form 8-K dated October 20, 1993, File No. 1-6468, as Exhibit 4(b), in Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 1997, File No. 1-6468, as Exhibit 3(c)2, in Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2000, File No. 1-6468, as Exhibit 3(c)2, in Form 8-K dated June 27, 2006, File No. 1-6468, as Exhibit 3.1, and in Form 8-K dated October 3, 2007, File No. 1-6468, as Exhibit 4.5.)
   (c) 2  
By-laws of Georgia Power as amended effective November 9, 2016, and as presently in effect. (Designated in Form 8-K dated November 9, 2016, File No. 1-6468, as Exhibit 3.1.)
  GulfMississippi Power
   (d)1
(d)2
By-laws of Gulf Power as amended effective July 1, 2017, and as presently in effect. (Designated in Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2017, File No. 001-31737, as Exhibit 3(d).)
Mississippi Power
(e) 1  
Articles of Incorporation of Mississippi Power, articles of merger of Mississippi Power Company (a Maine corporation) into Mississippi Power and articles of amendment to the articles of incorporation of Mississippi Power through April 2, 2004. (Designated in Registration No. 2-71540 as Exhibit 4(a)-1, in Form U5S for 1987, File No. 30-222-2, as Exhibit B-10, in Registration No. 33-49320 as Exhibit 4(b)-(1), in Form 8-K dated August 5, 1992, File No. 001-11229, as Exhibits 4(b)-2 and 4(b)-3, in Form 8-K dated August 4, 1993, File No. 001-11229, as Exhibit 4(b)-3, in Form 8-K dated August 18, 1993, File No. 001-11229, as Exhibit 4(b)-3, in Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 1997, File No. 001-11229, as Exhibit 3(e)2, in Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2000, File No. 001-11229, as Exhibit 3(e)2, and in Form 8-K dated March 3, 2004, File No. 001-11229, as Exhibit 4.6.)
   (e)(d) 2  
By-laws of Mississippi Power as amended effective July 1, 2017, and as presently in effect. (Designated in Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2017, File No. 001-11229, as Exhibit 3(e).)
  Southern Power
   (f)(e) 1  
Certificate of Incorporation of Southern Power Company dated January 8, 2001. (Designated in Registration No. 333-98553 as Exhibit 3.1.)
   (f)(e) 2  
By-laws of Southern Power Company effective January 8, 2001. (Designated in Registration No. 333-98553 as Exhibit 3.2.)
  Southern Company Gas
   (f) 1  
Amended and Restated Articles of Incorporation of Southern Company Gas dated July 11, 2016. (Designated in Form 8-K dated July 8, 2016, File No. 1-14174, as Exhibit 3.1.)
   (f) 2  
By-laws of Southern Company Gas effective July 11, 2016. (Designated in Form 8-K dated July 8, 2016, File No. 1-14174, as Exhibit 3.2.)
          

(4) Instruments Describing Rights of Security Holders, Including Indentures
  With respect to each of Southern Company, Alabama Power, Georgia Power, Gulf Power, Mississippi Power, Southern Power Company, and Southern Company Gas, such registrant has excluded certain instruments with respect to long-term debt that does not exceed 10% of the total assets of such registrant and its subsidiaries. Each such registrant agrees, upon request of the SEC, to furnish copies of any or all such instruments to the SEC.

  Southern Company
   (a) 1  
   (a) 2  
  Alabama Power
   (b) 1  
Subordinated Note Indenture dated as of January 1, 1997, between Alabama Power and Regions Bank, as Successor Trustee, and certain indentures supplemental thereto through October 2, 2002. (Designated in Form 8-K dated January 9, 1997, File No. 1-3164, as Exhibits 4.1, and in Form 8-K dated September 26, 2002, File No. 3164, as Exhibit 4.9-B.)
   (b) 2  
Senior Note Indenture dated as of December 1, 1997, between Alabama Power and Regions Bank, as Successor Trustee, and certain indentures supplemental thereto through November 8, 2017.June 28, 2018. (Designated in Form 8-K dated December 4, 1997, File No. 1-3164, as Exhibit 4.1, in Form 8-K dated December 6, 2002, File No. 1-3164, as Exhibit 4.2, in Form 8-K dated February 11, 2003, File No. 1-3164, as Exhibit 4.2(a), in Form 8-K dated February 11, 2003, File No. 1-3164, as Exhibit 4.2(b), in Form 8-K dated March 12, 2003, File No. 1-3164, as Exhibit 4.2, in Form 8-K dated May 1, 2003, File No. 1-3164, as Exhibit 4.2, in Form 8-K dated November 14, 2003, File No. 1-3164, as Exhibit 4.2, in Form 8-K dated May 8, 2008, File No. 1-3164, as Exhibit 4.2, in Form 8-K dated February 26, 2009, File No. 1-3164 as Exhibit 4.2, in Form 8-K dated September 27, 2010, File No. 1-3164, as Exhibit 4.2, in Form 8-K dated March 3, 2011, File No. 1-3164, as Exhibit 4.2, in Form 8-K dated May 18, 2011, File No. 1-3164, as Exhibit 4.2(a), in Form 8-K dated May 18, 2011, File No. 1-3164, as Exhibit 4.2(b),in Form 8-K dated January 10, 2012, File No. 1-3164, as Exhibit 4.2, in Form 8-K dated October 9, 2012, File No. 1-3164, as Exhibit 4.2, in Form 8-K dated November 27, 2012, File No. 1-3164, as Exhibit 4.2, in Form 8-K dated December 3, 2013, File No. 1-3164, as Exhibit 4.2, in Form 8-K dated August 20, 2014, File No. 1-3164, as Exhibit 4.6, in Form 8-K dated March 5, 2015, File No. 1-3164, as Exhibit 4.6, in Form 8-K dated April 9, 2015, File No. 1-3164, as Exhibit 4.6(b), in Form 8-K dated January 8, 2016, File No. 1-3164, as Exhibit 4.6, in Form 8-K dated February 27, 2017, File No. 1-3164, as Exhibit 4.6, and in Form 8-K dated November 2, 2017, File No. 1-3164, as Exhibit 4.6, and in Form 8-K dated June 21, 2018, File No. 1-3164, as Exhibit 4.6.)
   (b) 3  
Amended and Restated Trust Agreement of Alabama Power Capital Trust V dated as of October 1, 2002. (Designated in Form 8-K dated September 26, 2002, File No. 1-3164, as Exhibit 4.12-B.)
   (b) 4  
Guarantee Agreement relating to Alabama Power Capital Trust V dated as of October 1, 2002. (Designated in Form 8-K dated September 26, 2002, File No. 1-3164, as Exhibit 4.16-B.)
    Table of Contents                                Index to Financial Statements

  Georgia Power
   (c) 1  
   (c) 2  
Subordinated Note Indenture, dated as of September 1, 2017, between Georgia Power and Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as Trustee, and First Supplemental Indenture thereto dated as of September 21, 2017. (Designated in Form 8-K dated September 18, 2017, File No. 1-6468, as Exhibit 4.3, and in Form 8-K dated September 18, 2017, File No. 1-6468, as Exhibit 4.4.)
   (c) 3  
Loan Guarantee Agreement between Georgia Power and the DOE dated as of February 20, 2014, Amendment No. 1 thereto dated as of June 4, 2015, Amendment No. 2 thereto dated as of March 9, 2016, Amendment No. 3 thereto dated as of July 27, 2017, and Amendment No. 4 thereto dated as of December 8, 2017. (Designated in Form 8-K dated February 20, 2014, File No. 1-6468, as Exhibit 4.1, in Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2015, File No. 1-6468, as Exhibit 10(c)1, in Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2016, File No. 1-6468, as Exhibit 4(c)3, in Form 8-K dated July 27, 2017, File No. 1-6468, as Exhibit 4.1, and in Form 8-K dated December 8, 2017, File No. 1-6468, as Exhibit 4.1.)
   (c) 4  
Note Purchase Agreement among Georgia Power, the DOE, and the Federal Financing Bank dated as of February 20, 2014. (Designated in Form 8-K dated February 20, 2014, File No. 1-6468, as Exhibit 4.2.)
   (c) 5  
Future Advance Promissory Note dated February 20, 2014 made by Georgia Power to the FFB. (Designated in Form 8-K dated February 20, 2014, File No. 1-6468, as Exhibit 4.3.)
   (c) 6  
Deed to Secure Debt, Security Agreement and Fixture Filing between Georgia Power and PNC Bank, National Association, doing business as Midland Loan Services Inc., a division of PNC Bank, National Association dated as of February 20, 2014. (Designated in Form 8-K dated February 20, 2014, File No. 1-6468, as Exhibit 4.4.)
   (c) 7  
Owners Consent to Assignment and Direct Agreement and Amendment to Plant Alvin W. Vogtle Additional Units Ownership Participation Agreement by and among Georgia Power, OPC, MEAG Power, and Dalton dated as of February 20, 2014. (Designated in Form 8-K dated February 20, 2014, File No. 1-6468, as Exhibit 4.5.)
  GulfMississippi Power
   (d)1
Mississippi Power
(e) 1  
Senior Note Indenture dated as of May 1, 1998, between Mississippi Power and Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as Successor Trustee, and certain indentures supplemental thereto through March 9, 2012.27, 2018. (Designated in Form 8-K dated May 14, 1998, File No. 001-11229, as Exhibit 4.1, in Form 8-K dated June 24, 2005, File No. 001-11229, as Exhibit 4.2, in Form 8-K dated March 3, 2009, File No. 001-11229, as Exhibit 4.2, in Form 8-K dated October 11, 2011, File No. 001-11229, as Exhibit 4.2(b), and in Form 8-K dated March 5, 2012, File No. 001-11229, as Exhibit 4.2(b).), in
(e)2
    Table of Contents                                Index to Financial Statements

  Southern Power
   (f)(e) 1  
*(f)2
  Southern Company Gas
   (g)(f) 1  
Indenture dated February 20, 2001 between AGL Capital Corporation, AGL Resources Inc., and The Bank of New York, as Trustee. (Designated in Form S-3, File No. 333-69500, as Exhibit 4.2.)
   (g)(f) 2  
Southern Company Gas Capital Corporation's 6.00% Senior Notes due 2034, 5.25% Senior Notes due 2019, Form of 3.50% Senior Notes due 2021, 5.875% Senior Notes due 2041, Form of Series B Senior Notes due 2018, 4.40% Senior Notes due 2043, 3.875% Senior Notes due 2025, 3.250% Senior Notes due 2026, Form of 2.450% Senior Note due October 1, 2023, Form of 3.950% Senior Note due October 1, 2046, and Form of Series 2017A 4.400% Senior Note due May 30, 2047. (Designated in Form 8-K dated September 22, 2004, File No. 1-14174, as Exhibit 4.1, in Form 8-K dated August 5, 2009, File No. 1-14174, as Exhibit 4.1, in Form 8-K dated September 15, 2011, File No. 1-14174, as Exhibit 4.1, in Form 8-K dated March 16, 2011, File No. 1-14174, as Exhibit 4.1, in Form 8-K dated August 31, 2011, File No. 1-14174, as Exhibit 4.2, in Form 8-K dated May 13, 2013, File No. 1-14174, as Exhibit 4.2, in Form 8-K dated November 13, 2015, File No. 1-14174, as Exhibit 4.2, in Form 8-K dated May 13, 2016, File No. 1-14174, as Exhibit 4.2, in Form 8-K dated September 8, 2016, File No. 1-14174, as Exhibit 4.1(a), in Form 8-K dated September 8, 2016, File No. 1-14174, as Exhibit 4.1(b), and in Form 8-K dated May 5, 2017, File No. 1-14174, as Exhibit 4.1, respectively.)
   (g)(f) 3  
Southern Company Gas' Guarantee related to the 6.00% Senior Notes due 2034, Guarantee related to the 5.25% Senior Notes due 2019, Guarantee related to the 5.875% Senior Notes due 2041, Form of Guarantee related to the 3.50% Senior Notes due 2021, Guarantee related to the 4.40% Senior Notes due 2043, Guarantee related to the 3.875% Senior Notes due 2025, Guarantee related to the 3.250% Senior Notes due 2026, Form of Guarantee related to the 2.450% Senior Notes due October 1, 2023, Form of Guarantee related to the 3.950% Senior Notes due October 1, 2046, and Form of Guarantee related to the Series 2017A 4.400% Senior Notes due May 30, 2047. (Designated in Form 8-K dated September 22, 2004, File No. 1-14174, as Exhibit 4.3, in Form 8-K dated March 16, 2011, File No. 1-14174, as Exhibit 4.2, in Form 8-K dated September 15, 2011, File No. 1-14174, as Exhibit 4.2, in Form 8-K dated May 13, 2013, File No. 1-14174, as Exhibit 4.3, in Form 8-K dated November 13, 2015, File No. 1-14174, as Exhibit 4.3, in Form 8-K dated May 13, 2016, File No. 1-14174, as Exhibit 4.3, in Form 8-K dated September 8, 2016, File No. 1-14174, as Exhibit 4.3(a), in Form 8-K dated September 8, 2016, File No. 1-14174, as Exhibit 4.3(b), and in Form 8-K dated May 5, 2017, File No. 1-14174, as Exhibit 4.3, respectively.)
   (g)(f) 4  Indenture dated December 1, 1989 of Atlanta Gas Light Company and First Supplemental Indenture thereto dated March 16, 1992. (Designated in Form S-3, File No. 33-32274, as Exhibit 4(a) and in Form S-3, File No. 33-46419, as Exhibit 4(a).)
    Table of Contents                                Index to Financial Statements

   (g)(f) 5  
Indenture of Commonwealth Edison Company to Continental Illinois National Bank and Trust Company of Chicago, Trustee, dated as of January 1, 1954, Indenture of Adoption of Northern Illinois Gas Company to Continental Illinois National Bank and Trust Company of Chicago, Trustee, dated February 9, 1954, and certain indentures supplemental thereto. (Designated in Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 1995, File No. 1-7296, as Exhibit 4.01, in Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 1995, File No. 1-7296, as Exhibit 4.02, in Registration No. 2-56578 as Exhibits 2.21 and 2.25, in Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 1996, File No. 1-7296, as Exhibit 4.01, in Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 1997, File No. 1-7296, as Exhibit 4.19, in Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2003, File No. 1-7296, as Exhibit 4.09, in Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2003, File No. 1-7296, as Exhibit 4.10, in Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2003, File No. 1-7296, as Exhibit 4.11, in Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2006, File No. 1-7296, as Exhibit 4.11, in Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2008, File No. 1-7296, as Exhibit 4.01, in Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 31, 2009, File No. 1-7296, as Exhibit 4.01, in Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2012, File No. 1-7296, as Exhibit 4, and in Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2016, File No. 1-14174, as Exhibit 4(g)6, in Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2017, File No. 1-14174, as Exhibit 4(g)6, and in Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2018, File No. 1-14174, as Exhibit 4(g)1.)
*(g)6
          
(10) Material Contracts
  Southern Company
  #(a) 1  
Southern Company 2011 Omnibus Incentive Compensation Plan effective May 25, 2011. (Designated in Form 8-K dated May 25, 2011, File No. 1-3526, as Exhibit 10.1.)
  #(a) 2  
Form of Stock Option Award Agreement for Executive Officers of Southern Company under the Southern Company Omnibus Incentive Compensation Plan. (Designated in Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2011, File No. 1-3526, as Exhibit 10(a)3.)
  #(a) 3  
Deferred Compensation Plan for Outside Directors of The Southern Company, Amended and Restated effective January 1, 2008 and First Amendment thereto effective April 1, 2015. (Designated in Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2007, File No. 1-3526, as Exhibit 10(a)3 and in Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2015, File No. 1-3526, as Exhibit 10(a)2.)
  #   *(a) 4  
  #(a) 5  
The Southern Company Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan, Amended and Restated effective June 30, 2016, and Amendment No. 1 thereto effective January 1, 2017.2017, Amendment No. 2 thereto effective January 1, 2018, and Amendment No. 3 thereto effective April 1, 2018. (Designated in Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2016, File No. 1-3526, as Exhibit 10(a)1 and, in Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2016, File No. 13536,1-3536, as Exhibit 10(a)18, in Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2017, File No. 1-3526, as Exhibit 10(a)16, and in Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2018, File No. 1-3526, as Exhibit 10(a)1.)
  #(a) 6  
The Southern Company Supplemental Benefit Plan, Amended and Restated effective as of June 30, 2016, and Amendment No. 1 thereto effective January 1, 2017.2017, Amendment No. 2 thereto effective January 1, 2018, and Amendment No. 3 thereto effective April 1, 2018. (Designated in Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2016, File No. 1-3526, as Exhibit 10(a)2  and, in Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2016, File No. 13536,1-3536, as Exhibit 10(a)19, in Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2017, File No. 1-3526, as Exhibit 10(a)17, and in Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2018, File No. 1-3526, as Exhibit 10(a)2.)
  #(a) 7  
The Southern Company Change in Control Benefits Protection Plan (an amendment and restatement of The Southern Company Change in Control Benefit Plan Determination Policy), effective December 31, 2008.2008 and Amendment No. 1 thereto effective March 1, 2018. (Designated in Form 8-K dated December 31, 2008, File No. 1-3526, as Exhibit 10.1 and in Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2018, File No. 1-3526, as Exhibit 10(a)3.)

  #(a) 8  
Deferred Cash Compensation Trust Agreement for Directors of Southern Company and its Subsidiaries, Amended and Restated effective January 1, 2001, between Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., as successor to Wachovia Bank, N.A., Southern Company, SCS, Alabama Power, Georgia Power, Gulf Power, Mississippi Power, Southern Linc, Southern Company Energy Solutions, LLC, and Southern Nuclear and First Amendment thereto effective January 1, 2009. (Designated in Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2000, File No. 1-3526, as Exhibit 10(a)103 and in Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008, File No. 1-3526, as Exhibit 10(a)16.)
  #(a) 9  
Deferred Stock Trust Agreement for Directors of Southern Company and its Subsidiaries, Amended and Restated effective January 1, 2000, between Reliance Trust Company, Southern Company, Alabama Power, Georgia Power, Gulf Power, and Mississippi Power and First Amendment thereto effective January 1, 2009. (Designated in Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2000, File No. 1-3526, as Exhibit 10(a)104 and in Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008, File No. 1-3526, as Exhibit 10(a)18.)

  #(a) 10  
Deferred Cash Compensation Trust Agreement for Directors of Southern Company and its Subsidiaries, Amended and Restated effective September 1, 2001, between Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., as successor to Wachovia Bank, N.A., Southern Company, Alabama Power, Georgia Power, Gulf Power, and Mississippi Power and First Amendment thereto effective January 1, 2009. (Designated in Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2001, File No. 1-3526, as Exhibit 10(a)92 and in Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008, File No. 1-3526, as Exhibit 10(a)20.)
  #(a) 11  
Southern Company Senior Executive Change in Control Severance Plan, Amended and Restated effective December 31, 2008, First Amendment thereto effective October 19, 2009, and Second Amendment thereto effective February 22, 2011. (Designated in Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008, File No. 1-3526, as Exhibit 10(a)23, in Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009, File No. 1-3526, as Exhibit 10(a)22, and in Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010, File No. 1-3526, as Exhibit 10(a)16.)
  #(a) 12  
Southern Company Executive Change in Control Severance Plan, Amended and Restated effective December 31, 2008 and First Amendment thereto effective January 1, 2010. (Designated in Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008, File No. 1-3526, as Exhibit 10(a)24 and in Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009, File No. 1-3526, as Exhibit 10(a)24.)
  #(a) 13  
Form of Terms for Performance Share Awards granted under the Southern Company 2011 Omnibus Incentive Compensation Plan. (Designated in Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2017, File No. 1-3526, as Exhibit 10(a)1).
  #(a) 14  
Outside Directors Stock Plan for The Southern Company and its Subsidiaries effective June 1, 2015. (Designated in Definitive Proxy Statement filed April 10, 2015, File No. 1-3526, as Appendix A.)
  #(a) 15  
Deferred Compensation Agreement between Southern Company, SCS, Alabama Power, and Mark A. Crosswhite, effective July 30, 2008. (Designated in Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2016, File No. 1-3526, as Exhibit 10(a)17.)
  #   *(a) 16
#   *(a)17
(a)18  
The Southern Company Employee Savings Plan, Amended and Restated effective January 1, 2018. (Designated in Post-Effective Amendment No. 1 to Form S-8, File No. 333-212783 as Exhibit 4.3.)
  #(a) 1917  
Form of Terms for Restricted Stock Unit with Performance Measure Awards granted under the Southern Company 2011 Omnibus Incentive Compensation Plan. (Designated in Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2017, File No. 1-3526, as Exhibit 10(a)2.)
  #(a) 2018  
Letter Agreement among Southern Company Gas, Southern Company, and Andrew W. Evans and Performance Stock Unit Award Agreement, dated September 29, 2016. (Designated in Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2017, File No. 1-3526, as Exhibit 10(a)3.)
  #(a) 2119  
Form of Time-Vesting Restricted Stock Unit Awards granted under the Southern Company 2011 Omnibus Incentive Compensation Plan. (Designated in Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2017, File No. 1-3526, as Exhibit 10(a)4.)
#(a)20
Consulting Agreement between SCS and Arthur P. Beattie effective August 1, 2018. (Designated in Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2018, File No. 1-3526, as Exhibit 10(a)1.)
#   *(a)21
#   *(a)22

#   *(a)23
#   *(a)24
#   *(a)25
#   *(a)26
#   *(a)27
#   *(a)28
  Alabama Power
   (b) 1  
Intercompany Interchange Contract as revised effective May 1, 2007, among Alabama Power, Georgia Power, Gulf Power, Mississippi Power, Southern Power Company, and SCS. (Designated in Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2007, File No. 1-3164, as Exhibit 10(b)5.)
  *(b)2
#(b) 23  Southern Company 2011 Omnibus Incentive Compensation Plan effective May 25, 2011. See Exhibit 10(a)1 herein.
  #(b) 34  Form of Stock Option Award Agreement for Executive Officers of Southern Company under the Southern Company Omnibus Incentive Compensation Plan. See Exhibit 10(a)2 herein.
  #(b) 45  Southern Company Deferred Compensation Plan, Amended and Restated as of January 1, 2018. See Exhibit 10(a)4 herein.
  #(b) 56  The Southern Company Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan, Amended and Restated effective June 30, 2016 and Amendment No. 1 thereto effective January 1, 2017. See Exhibit 10(a)5 herein.

  #(b) 67  The Southern Company Supplemental Benefit Plan, Amended and Restated effective as of June 30, 2016 and Amendment No. 1 thereto effective January 1, 2017. See Exhibit 10(a)6 herein.
  #(b) 78  Southern Company Executive Change in Control Severance Plan, Amended and Restated effective December 31, 2008 and First Amendment thereto effective January 1, 2010. See Exhibit 10(a)12 herein.
  #(b) 89  
Deferred Compensation Plan for Outside Directors of Alabama Power Company, Amended and Restated effective January 1, 2008 and First Amendment thereto effective June 1, 2015. (Designated in Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2008, File No. 1-3164, as Exhibit 10(b)1 and in Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2015, File No. 1-3164, as Exhibit 10(b)1.)
  #(b) 910  The Southern Company Change in Control Benefits Protection Plan (an amendment and restatement of The Southern Company Change in Control Benefit Plan Determination Policy), effective December 31, 2008. See Exhibit 10(a)7 herein.
  #(b) 1011  Deferred Cash Compensation Trust Agreement for Directors of Southern Company and its Subsidiaries, Amended and Restated effective January 1, 2001, between Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., as successor to Wachovia Bank, N.A., Southern Company, SCS, Alabama Power, Georgia Power, Gulf Power, Mississippi Power, Southern Linc, Southern Company Energy Solutions, LLC, and Southern Nuclear and First Amendment thereto effective January 1, 2009. See Exhibit 10(a)8 herein.
  #(b) 1112  Deferred Stock Trust Agreement for Directors of Southern Company and its Subsidiaries, Amended and Restated effective January 1, 2000, between Reliance Trust Company, Southern Company, Alabama Power, Georgia Power, Gulf Power, and Mississippi Power and First Amendment thereto effective January 1, 2009. See Exhibit 10(a)9 herein.
  #(b) 1213  Deferred Cash Compensation Trust Agreement for Directors of Southern Company and its Subsidiaries, Amended and Restated effective September 1, 2001, between Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., as successor to Wachovia Bank, N.A., Southern Company, Alabama Power, Georgia Power, Gulf Power, and Mississippi Power and First Amendment thereto effective January 1, 2009. See Exhibit 10(a)10 herein.

  #(b) 1314  Southern Company Senior Executive Change in Control Severance Plan, Amended and Restated effective December 31, 2008, First Amendment thereto effective October 19, 2009, and Second Amendment thereto effective February 22, 2011. See Exhibit 10(a)11 herein.
  #(b) 1415  Form of Terms for Performance Share Awards granted under the Southern Company 2011 Omnibus Incentive Compensation Plan. See Exhibit 10(a)13 herein.
  #(b) 1516  
Deferred Compensation Agreement between Southern Company, Alabama Power, Georgia Power, Gulf Power, Mississippi Power, and SCS and Philip C. Raymond dated September 15, 2010. (Designated in Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2010, File No. 1-3164, as Exhibit 10(b)2.)
  #(b) 1617  Deferred Compensation Agreement between Southern Company, SCS, Alabama Power, and Mark A. Crosswhite, effective July 30, 2008. See Exhibit 10(a)15 herein.
  #(b) 1718  Outside Directors Stock Plan for The Southern Company and its Subsidiaries effective June 1, 2015. See Exhibit 10(a)14 herein.
  #(b) 18Second Amendment to The Southern Company Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan effective January 1, 2018. See Exhibit 10(a)16 herein.
#(b)19  Second Amendment to TheForm of Terms for Restricted Stock Unit with Performance Measure Awards granted under the Southern Company Supplemental Benefit Plan effective January 1, 2018.2011 Omnibus Incentive Compensation Plan. See Exhibit 10(a)17 herein.
  #(b) 20  Form of Terms forTime-Vesting Restricted Stock Unit with Performance Measure Awards granted under the Southern Company 2011 Omnibus Incentive Compensation Plan. See Exhibit 10(a)19 herein.
  #(b) 21  Form of Time-Vesting Restricted Stock Unit Awards granted underFirst Amendment to the Southern Company 2011 Omnibus IncentiveDeferred Compensation Plan.Plan, dated December 7, 2018. See Exhibit 10(a)21 herein.
#(b)22Second Amendment to the Southern Company Deferred Compensation Plan, dated January 29, 2019.  See Exhibit 10(a)22 herein.
#(b)23Fourth Amendment to the Southern Company Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan, dated December 7, 2018. See Exhibit 10(a)23 herein.
#(b)24Fifth Amendment to the Southern Company Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan, dated January 29, 2019.  (See Exhibit 10(a)24 herein.
#(b)25Fourth Amendment to the Southern Company Supplemental Benefit Plan, dated December 14, 2018. See Exhibit 10(a)25 herein.
#(b)26Fifth Amendment to the Southern Company Supplemental Benefit Plan, dated January 29, 2019.  See Exhibit 10(a)26 herein.
#(b)27Second Amendment to the Deferred Stock Trust Agreement For Directors of Southern Company and Its Subsidiaries, dated December 29, 2018. See Exhibit 10(a)27 herein.
#(b)28Second Amendment to the Deferred Cash Compensation Trust Agreement For Directors of Southern Company and Its Subsidiaries, dated December 21, 2018. See Exhibit 10(a)28 herein.
  Georgia Power
   (c) 1  Intercompany Interchange Contract as revised effective May 1, 2007, among Alabama Power, Georgia Power, Gulf Power, Mississippi Power, Southern Power Company, and SCS. See Exhibit 10(b)1 herein.
   (c) 2  Appendix A to the Southern Company System Intercompany Interchange Contract, dated as of January 1, 2019. See Exhibit 10(b)2 herein.
(c)3Revised and Restated Integrated Transmission System Agreement dated as of November 12, 1990, between Georgia Power and OPC. (Designated in Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 1990, File No. 1-6468, as Exhibit 10(g).)

   (c) 34  Revised and Restated Integrated Transmission System Agreement between Georgia Power and Dalton dated as of December 7, 1990. (Designated in Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 1990, File No. 1-6468, as Exhibit 10(gg).)
   (c) 45  Revised and Restated Integrated Transmission System Agreement between Georgia Power and MEAG Power dated as of December 7, 1990. (Designated in Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 1990, File No. 1-6468, as Exhibit 10(hh).)

   (c) 56  
Interim Assessment Agreement dated as of March 29, 2017, by and among Georgia Power, for itself and as agent for Oglethorpe Power Corporation, Municipal Electric Authority of Georgia,OPC, MEAG, and The City of Dalton, Georgia, acting by and through its Board of Water, Light and Sinking Fund Commissioners, and Westinghouse, Electric Company LLC, WECTEC Staffing Services LLC, and WECTEC Global Project Services, Inc., Amendment 1 thereto dated as of April 28, 2017, Amendment 2 thereto dated as of May 12, 2017, Amendment 3 thereto dated as of June 3, 2017, Amendment 4 thereto dated as of June 5, 2017, Amendment 5 thereto dated as of March 29, 2017, Amendment 6 thereto dated as of June 22, 2017, Amendment 7 thereto dated as of June 28, 2017 and Amendment 8 thereto dated as of July 20, 2017. (Designated in Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2017, File No. 1-6468, as Exhibit 10(c)3, in Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2017, File No. 1-6468, as Exhibit 10(c)4, in Form 8-K dated May 12, 2017, File No. 1-6468, as Exhibit 10.1, in Form 8-K dated June 3, 2017, File No. 1-6468, as Exhibit 10.1, in Form 8-K dated June 5, 2017, File No. 1-6468, as Exhibit 10.1, in Form 8-K dated June 16, 2017, File No. 1-6468, as Exhibit 10.2, in Form 8-K dated June 22, 2017, File No. 1-6468, as Exhibit 10.1, in Form 8-K dated June 28, 2017, File No. 1-6468, as Exhibit 10.1, and in Form 8-K dated July 20, 2017, File No. 1-6468, as Exhibit 10.1.)
   (c) 67  
Settlement Agreement dated as of June 9, 2017, by and among Georgia Power, Oglethorpe Power Corporation, Municipal Electric Authority of Georgia, The City ofOPC, MEAG, Dalton, Georgia, acting by and through its Board of Water, Light and Sinking Fund Commissioners, and Toshiba Corporation and Amendment No. 1 thereto dated as of December 8, 2017. (Designated in Form 8-K dated June 16, 2017, File No. 1-6468, as Exhibit 10.1 and in Form 8-K dated December 8, 2017, File No. 1-6468, as Exhibit 10.1.)
   (c) 78  
Amended and Restated Services Agreement dated as of June 20, 2017, by and among Georgia Power, for itself and as agent for Oglethorpe Power Corporation, Municipal Electric Authority of Georgia,OPC, MEAG, MEAG Power SPVJ, LLC, MEAG Power SPVM, LLC, MEAG Power SPVP, LLC, and The City of Dalton, acting by and through its Board of Water, Light and Sinking Fund Commissioners, and Westinghouse Electric Company LLC and WECTEC Global Project Services, Inc. (Georgia Power requested confidential treatment for certain portions of this document pursuant to an application for confidential treatment sent to the SEC. Georgia Power omitted such portions from the filing and filed them separately with the SEC.) (Designated inForm 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2017, File No. 1-6468, as Exhibit 10(c)9.)
  *(c) 89  
*(c)10
Amendment No. 1 to Construction Completion Agreement dated as of October 12, 2018, between Georgia Power, for itself and as agent for OPC, MEAG, MEAG Power SPVJ, LLC, MEAG Power SPVM, LLC, MEAG Power SPVP, LLC, and Dalton, and Bechtel. (Georgia Power has requested confidential treatment for certain portions of this document pursuant to an application for confidential treatment sent to the SEC. Georgia Power omitted such portions from the filing and filed them separately with the SEC.)
   (c) 911  
Plant Alvin W. Vogtle Additional Units Ownership Participation Agreement dated as of April 21, 2006, among Georgia Power, Oglethorpe Power Corporation, Municipal Electric Authority of Georgia,OPC, MEAG, and The City of Dalton, Georgia, Amendment 1 thereto dated as of April 8, 2008, Amendment 2 thereto dated as of February 20, 2014, and Agreement Regarding Additional Participating Party Rights and Amendment 3 thereto dated as of November 2, 2017.2017, and First Amendment to Agreement Regarding Additional Participating Party Rights and Amendment No. 3 to Plant Alvin W. Vogtle Additional Units Ownership Participation Agreement, dated as of August 31, 2018. (Designated in Form 8-K dated April 21, 2006, File No. 33-7591, as Exhibit 10.4.4, in Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2013, File No. 000-53908, as Exhibit 10.3.2(a), in Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2013, File No. 000-53908, as Exhibit 10.3.2(b), and in Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2017, File No. 000-53908, as Exhibit 10.1, and in Form 8-K dated August 31, 2018, File No. 1-6468, as Exhibit 10.1.)
  Gulf*(c)12
Mississippi Power
   (d) 1  Intercompany Interchange Contract as revised effective May 1, 2007, among Alabama Power, Georgia Power, Gulf Power, Mississippi Power, Southern Power Company, and SCS. See Exhibit 10(b)1 herein.
  Mississippi Power
(d) (e)12  Appendix A to the Southern Company System Intercompany Interchange Contract, dated as revised effective Mayof January 1, 2007, among Alabama Power, Georgia Power, Gulf Power, Mississippi Power, Southern Power Company, and SCS.2019. See Exhibit 10(b)12 herein.
    Table of Contents                                Index to Financial Statements

   (e)(d) 23  Transmission Facilities Agreement dated February 25, 1982, Amendment No. 1 dated May 12, 1982 and Amendment No. 2 dated December 6, 1983, between Entergy Corporation (formerly Gulf States) and Mississippi Power. (Designated in Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 1981, File No. 001-11229, as Exhibit 10(f), in Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 1982, File No. 001-11229, as Exhibit 10(f)(2), and in Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 1983, File No. 001-11229, as Exhibit 10(f)(3).)
  #(e)3Southern Company 2011 Omnibus Incentive Compensation Plan effective May 25, 2011. See Exhibit 10(a)1 herein.
#(e)(d) 4Form of Stock Option Award Agreement for Executive Officers of Southern Company under the Southern Company Omnibus Incentive Compensation Plan. See Exhibit 10(a)2 herein.
#(e)5Southern Company Deferred Compensation Plan, Amended and Restated as of January 1, 2018. See Exhibit 10(a)4 herein.
#(e)6The Southern Company Supplemental Benefit Plan, Amended and Restated effective as of June 30, 2016 and Amendment No. 1 thereto effective January 1, 2017. See Exhibit 10(a)6 herein.
#(e)7Southern Company Executive Change in Control Severance Plan, Amended and Restated effective December 31, 2008 and First Amendment thereto effective January 1, 2010. See Exhibit 10(a)12 herein.
#(e)8The Southern Company Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan, Amended and Restated effective June 30, 2016 and Amendment No. 1 thereto effective January 1, 2017. See Exhibit 10(a)5 herein.
#(e)9
Deferred Compensation Plan for Outside Directors of Mississippi Power Company, Amended and Restated effective January 1, 2008 and First Amendment thereto effective April 1, 2015. (Designated in Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2008, File No. 001-11229 as Exhibit 10(e)1 and in Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2015, File No. 001-11229 as Exhibit 10(e)1.)
#(e)10The Southern Company Change in Control Benefits Protection Plan (an amendment and restatement of The Southern Company Change in Control Benefit Plan Determination Policy), effective December 31, 2008. See Exhibit 10(a)7 herein.
#(e)11Deferred Cash Compensation Trust Agreement for Directors of Southern Company and its Subsidiaries, Amended and Restated effective January 1, 2001, between Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., as successor to Wachovia Bank, N.A., Southern Company, SCS, Alabama Power, Georgia Power, Gulf Power, Mississippi Power, Southern Linc, Southern Company Energy Solutions, LLC, and Southern Nuclear and First Amendment thereto effective January 1, 2009. See Exhibit 10(a)8 herein.
#(e)12Deferred Stock Trust Agreement for Directors of Southern Company and its Subsidiaries, Amended and Restated effective January 1, 2000, between Reliance Trust Company, Southern Company, Alabama Power, Georgia Power, Gulf Power, and Mississippi Power and First Amendment thereto effective January 1, 2009. See Exhibit 10(a)9 herein.
#(e)13Deferred Cash Compensation Trust Agreement for Directors of Southern Company and its Subsidiaries, Amended and Restated effective September 1, 2001, between Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., as successor to Wachovia Bank, N.A., Southern Company, Alabama Power, Georgia Power, Gulf Power, and Mississippi Power and First Amendment thereto effective January 1, 2009. See Exhibit 10(a)10 herein.
#(e)14Southern Company Senior Executive Change in Control Severance Plan, Amended and Restated effective December 31, 2008, First Amendment thereto effective October 19, 2009, and Second Amendment thereto effective February 22, 2011. See Exhibit 10(a)11 herein.
(e)15  
Cooperative Agreement between the DOE and SCS dated as of December 12, 2008. (Designated in Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008, File No. 001-11229, as Exhibit 10(e)22.) (Mississippi Power requested confidential treatment for certain portions of this document pursuant to an application for confidential treatment sent to the SEC. Mississippi Power omitted such portions from this filing and filed them separately with the SEC.)
  #(e)16Form of Terms for Performance Share Awards granted under the Southern Company 2011 Omnibus Incentive Compensation Plan. See Exhibit 10(a)13 herein.
#(e)17Outside Directors Stock Plan for The Southern Company and its Subsidiaries effective June 1, 2015. See Exhibit 10(a)14 herein.
#(e)18
Letter Agreement between Mississippi Power and Emile J. Troxclair III dated December 11, 2014. (Designated in Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2016, File No. 001-11229, as Exhibit 10(e)1.)

#(e)19
Performance Award Agreement between Southern Company Services, Inc. and Emile J. Troxclair III effective as of January 3, 2015. (Designated in Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2016, File No. 001-11229, as Exhibit 10(e)2.)
#(e)20Second Amendment to The Southern Company Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan effective January 1, 2018. See Exhibit 10(a)16 herein.
#(e)21Second Amendment to The Southern Company Supplemental Benefit Plan effective January 1, 2018. See Exhibit 10(a)17 herein.
#(e)22Form of Terms for Restricted Stock Unit with Performance Measure Awards granted under the Southern Company 2011 Omnibus Incentive Compensation Plan. See Exhibit 10(a)19 herein.
#(e)23Form of Time-Vesting Restricted Stock Unit Awards granted under the Southern Company 2011 Omnibus Incentive Compensation Plan. See Exhibit 10(a)21 herein.
Southern Power
   (f)(e) 1  Intercompany Interchange Contract as revised effective May 1, 2007, among Alabama Power, Georgia Power, Gulf Power, Mississippi Power, Southern Power Company, and SCS. See Exhibit 10(b)1 herein.
  (e)2Appendix A to the Southern Company System Intercompany Interchange Contract, dated as of January 1, 2019. See Exhibit 10(b)2 herein.
Southern Company Gas
   (g)(f) 1
Note Purchase Agreement dated August 31, 2011. (Designated in Form 8-K dated August 31, 2011, File No. 1-14174, as Exhibit 10.1.)
(g)3  
Final Allocation Agreement dated January 3, 2008. (Designated in Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2007, File No. 1-7296, as Exhibit 10.15.)
   (g)(f) 4
Bank Rate Mode Covenants Agreement, dated as of February 26, 2013 and First Amendment to Bank Rate Mode Covenants Agreement dated as of October 30, 2015. (Designated in Form 8-K dated February 26, 2013, File No. 1-14174, as Exhibit 10.1 and in Form 8-K dated October 30, 2015, File No. 1-14174, as Exhibit 10.3.)
(g)5
Loan Agreement dated as of February 1, 2013. (Designated in Form 8-K dated February 26, 2013, File No. 1-14174, as Exhibit 10.2.)
(g)6
Loan Agreement dated as of March 1, 2013. (Designated in Form 8-K dated March 25, 2013, File No. 1-14174, as Exhibit 10.1.)
(g)7
Amended and Restated Loan Agreement dated as of March 1, 2013. (Designated in Form 8-K dated March 25, 2013, File No. 1-14174, as Exhibit 10.2.)
(g)8
Amended and Restated Loan Agreement dated as of March 1, 2013. (Designated in Form 8-K dated March 25, 2013, File No. 1-14174, as Exhibit 10.3.)
(g)9
Amended and Restated Loan Agreement dated as of March 1, 2013. (Designated in Form 8-K dated March 25, 2013, File No. 1-14174, as Exhibit 10.4.)
(g)102  
Asset Purchase Agreement, dated as of October 15, 2017, by and between Pivotal Utility Holdings, Inc., as Seller, and South Jersey Industries, Inc., as Buyer. (Designated in Form 8-K dated October 15, 2017, File No. 1-14174, as Exhibit 10.1.)
          
(14) Code of Ethics
  Southern Company
   (a)    
The Southern Company Code of Ethics. (Designated in Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2016, File No. 1-3526, as Exhibit 14(a).)
  Alabama Power
   (b)    The Southern Company Code of Ethics. See Exhibit 14(a) herein.
  Georgia Power
   (c)    The Southern Company Code of Ethics. See Exhibit 14(a) herein.
  GulfMississippi Power
   (d)    The Southern Company Code of Ethics. See Exhibit 14(a) herein.
  MississippiSouthern Power
   (e)    The Southern Company Code of Ethics. See Exhibit 14(a) herein.
  Southern Power
(f)The Southern Company Code of Ethics. See Exhibit 14(a) herein.

Southern Company Gas
   (g)(f)    The Southern Company Code of Ethics. See Exhibit 14(a) herein.
          
(21) Subsidiaries of Registrants
  Southern Company
  *(a)    
  Alabama Power
   (b)    Subsidiaries of Registrant. See Exhibit 21(a) herein.
  Georgia Power
   Omitted pursuant to General Instruction I(2)(b) of Form 10-K.
  GulfMississippi Power
   Omitted pursuant to General Instruction I(2)(b) of Form 10-K.
Mississippi Power
(e)Subsidiaries of Registrant. See Exhibit 21(a) herein.
  Southern Power
   Omitted pursuant to General Instruction I(2)(b) of Form 10-K.
  Southern Company Gas
   Omitted pursuant to General Instruction I(2)(b) of Form 10-K

          
(23) Consents of Experts and Counsel
  Southern Company
  *(a) 1
  
  Alabama Power
  *(b) 1
  
  Georgia Power
  *(c) 1
  
  GulfMississippi Power
  *(d) 1
  
  MississippiSouthern Power
  *(e) 1
  
  Southern PowerCompany Gas
  *(f) 1
  
  Southern Company Gas
*(g)1
*(g)(f) 2
  
  *(g)(f) 3
  
          
(24) Powers of Attorney and Resolutions
  Southern Company
  *(a) 1
  
*(a)2
  Alabama Power
  *(b)    
  Georgia Power
  *(c)    


Gulf Power
*(d)1
*(d)2
  Mississippi Power
  *(e)(d) 1  
  *(e)(d) 2  
  Southern Power
  *(f)(e) 1  
  *(f)(e) 2  
  Southern Company Gas
  *(g)(f) 1  
  *(g)(f) 2  
          
(32) Section 906 Certifications
  Southern Company
  *(a)    
  Alabama Power
  *(b)    

  Georgia Power
  *(c)    
  GulfMississippi Power
  *(d)
Mississippi Power
*(e)    
  Southern Power
  *(f)(e)    
  Southern Company Gas
  *(g)(f)    
          
(99) Additional Exhibits
  Southern Company Gas
  *(g)(f)    
          
(101)XBRL-Related Documents
  *INS   XBRL Instance Document
  *SCH   XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document
  *CAL   XBRL Taxonomy Calculation Linkbase Document
  *DEF   XBRL Definition Linkbase Document
  *LAB   XBRL Taxonomy Label Linkbase Document
  *PRE   XBRL Taxonomy Presentation Linkbase Document
** Schedules and exhibits have been omitted pursuant to Item 601(b)(2) of Regulation S-K. A copy of any omitted schedule or exhibit will be furnished supplementally to the Securities and Exchange Commission upon request; provided, however, that each registrant may request confidential treatment pursuant to Rule 24b-2 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, for any schedules or exhibits so furnished.
    Table of Contents                                Index to Financial Statements

THE SOUTHERN COMPANY
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized. The signature of the undersigned company shall be deemed to relate only to matters having reference to such company and any subsidiaries thereof.
THE SOUTHERN COMPANY
  
By:Thomas A. Fanning
 Chairman, President, and
 Chief Executive Officer
  
By:/s/Melissa K. Caen
 (Melissa K. Caen, Attorney-in-fact)
  
Date:February 20, 201819, 2019
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated. The signature of each of the undersigned shall be deemed to relate only to matters having reference to the above-named company and any subsidiaries thereof.
 
Thomas A. Fanning
Chairman, President, and
Chief Executive Officer
(Principal Executive Officer)
   
    
Art P. BeattieAndrew W. Evans
Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
(Principal Financial Officer)
   
    
Ann P. Daiss
Comptroller and Chief Accounting Officer
(Principal Accounting Officer)
   
Directors:  
Janaki Akella
Juanita Powell Baranco
Jon A. Boscia
Henry A. Clark III
Anthony F. Earley, Jr.
David J. Grain
Veronica M. Hagen
Warren A. Hood, Jr.
Linda P. Hudson

Donald M. James
John D. Johns
Dale E. Klein
Ernest J. Moniz
William G. Smith, Jr.
Steven R. Specker
Larry D. Thompson
E. Jenner Wood III

  
By: /s/Melissa K. Caen
  (Melissa K. Caen, Attorney-in-fact)
Date: February 20, 201819, 2019



    Table of Contents                                Index to Financial Statements

ALABAMA POWER COMPANY
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized. The signature of the undersigned company shall be deemed to relate only to matters having reference to such company and any subsidiaries thereof.
ALABAMA POWER COMPANY
  
By:Mark A. Crosswhite
 Chairman, President, and Chief Executive Officer
  
By:/s/Melissa K. Caen
 (Melissa K. Caen, Attorney-in-fact)
  
Date:February 20, 201819, 2019
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated. The signature of each of the undersigned shall be deemed to relate only to matters having reference to the above-named company and any subsidiaries thereof.
 
Mark A. Crosswhite
Chairman, President, and Chief Executive Officer
(Principal Executive Officer)
   
    
Philip C. Raymond
Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer, and Treasurer
(Principal Financial Officer)
   
    
Anita Allcorn-Walker
Vice President and Comptroller
(Principal Accounting Officer)
   
Directors:  
Whit Armstrong
David J.Angus R. Cooper, Sr.III
O. B. Grayson Hall, Jr.
Anthony A. Joseph
Patricia M. KingJames K. Lowder

James K. Lowder
Robert D. Powers
Catherine J. Randall
C. Dowd Ritter
R. Mitchell Shackleford, III
Phillip M. Webb
  
By: /s/Melissa K. Caen
  (Melissa K. Caen, Attorney-in-fact)
Date: February 20, 201819, 2019



    Table of Contents                                Index to Financial Statements

GEORGIA POWER COMPANY
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized. The signature of the undersigned company shall be deemed to relate only to matters having reference to such company and any subsidiaries thereof.
GEORGIA POWER COMPANY
  
By:W. Paul Bowers
 Chairman, President, and Chief Executive Officer
  
By:/s/Melissa K. Caen
 (Melissa K. Caen, Attorney-in-fact)
  
Date:February 20, 201819, 2019
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated. The signature of each of the undersigned shall be deemed to relate only to matters having reference to the above-named company and any subsidiaries thereof.
 
W. Paul Bowers
Chairman, President, and Chief Executive Officer
(Principal Executive Officer)
   
    
Xia Liu
Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer,
and Treasurer
(Principal Financial Officer)
   
    
David P. Poroch
Comptroller and Vice President
(Principal Accounting Officer)
   
Directors:  
Mark L. Burns
Shantella E. Cooper
Lawrence L. Gellerstedt III
Stephen S. Green
Douglas J. Hertz
Kessel D. Stelling, Jr.
Jimmy C. Tallent
Charles K. Tarbutton
Beverly Daniel Tatum
Clyde C. Tuggle
  
By: /s/Melissa K. Caen
  (Melissa K. Caen, Attorney-in-fact)
Date: February 20, 201819, 2019




GULF POWER COMPANY
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized. The signature of the undersigned company shall be deemed to relate only to matters having reference to such company and any subsidiaries thereof.
GULF POWER COMPANY
By:S. W. Connally, Jr.
Chairman, President, and Chief Executive Officer
By:/s/Melissa K. Caen
(Melissa K. Caen, Attorney-in-fact)
Date:February 20, 2018
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated. The signature of each of the undersigned shall be deemed to relate only to matters having reference to the above-named company and any subsidiaries thereof.

S. W. Connally, Jr.
Chairman, President, and Chief Executive Officer
(Principal Executive Officer)
Robin B. Boren
Vice President, Chief Financial Officer, and Treasurer
(Principal Financial Officer)
Paul D. Trippe
Comptroller
(Principal Accounting Officer)
Directors:
Allan G. BenseJ. Mort O'Sullivan, III
Deborah H. CalderMichael T. Rehwinkel
William C. Cramer, Jr.Winston E. Scott
Julian B. MacQueen
By:/s/Melissa K. Caen
(Melissa K. Caen, Attorney-in-fact)

Date: February 20, 2018


Supplemental Information to be Furnished with Reports Filed Pursuant to Section 15(d) of the Act by Registrants Which Have Not Registered Securities Pursuant to Section 12 of the Act:

Gulf Power Company is not required to send an annual report or proxy statement to its sole shareholder and parent company, The Southern Company, and will not prepare such a report after filing this Annual Report on Form 10-K for fiscal year 2017. Accordingly, Gulf Power Company will not file an annual report with the Securities and Exchange Commission.




    Table of Contents                                Index to Financial Statements

MISSISSIPPI POWER COMPANY
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized. The signature of the undersigned company shall be deemed to relate only to matters having reference to such company and any subsidiaries thereof.
MISSISSIPPI POWER COMPANY
  
By:Anthony L. Wilson
 Chairman, President, and Chief Executive Officer
  
By:/s/Melissa K. Caen
 (Melissa K. Caen, Attorney-in-fact)
  
Date:February 20, 201819, 2019
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated. The signature of each of the undersigned shall be deemed to relate only to matters having reference to the above-named company and any subsidiaries thereof.
 
Anthony L. Wilson
Chairman, President, and Chief Executive Officer
(Principal Executive Officer)
   
    
Moses H. Feagin
Vice President, Treasurer, and
Chief Financial Officer
(Principal Financial Officer)
   
    
Cynthia F. Shaw
Comptroller
(Principal Accounting Officer)
   
Directors:  
Carl J. Chaney
L. Royce Cumbest
Thomas M. Duff
Mark E. Keenum
Christine L. Pickering
L. Royce CumbestPhillip J. Terrell
Mark E. Keenum
M.L. Waters
Camille S. Young
  
By: /s/Melissa K. Caen
  (Melissa K. Caen, Attorney-in-fact)
Date: February 20, 201819, 2019


Supplemental Information to be Furnished with Reports Filed Pursuant to Section 15(d) of the Act by Registrants Which Have Not Registered Securities Pursuant to Section 12 of the Act:

Mississippi Power is not required to send an annual report or proxy statement to its sole shareholder and parent company, The Southern Company, and will not prepare such a report after filing this Annual Report on Form 10-K for fiscal year 2018. Accordingly, Mississippi Power will not file an annual report with the Securities and Exchange Commission.




    Table of Contents                                Index to Financial Statements

SOUTHERN POWER COMPANY
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized. The signature of the undersigned company shall be deemed to relate only to matters having reference to such company and any subsidiaries thereof.
SOUTHERN POWER COMPANY
  
By:Joseph A. MillerMark S. Lantrip
 Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer
  
By:/s/Melissa K. Caen
 (Melissa K. Caen, Attorney-in-fact)
  
Date:February 20, 201819, 2019
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated. The signature of each of the undersigned shall be deemed to relate only to matters having reference to the above-named company and any subsidiaries thereof.
 
Joseph A. MillerMark S. Lantrip
Chairman, President, and Chief Executive Officer
(Principal Executive Officer)
   
    
William C. Grantham
Senior Vice President, Chief Financial Officer, and Treasurer
(Principal Financial Officer)
   
    
Elliott L. Spencer
Comptroller and Corporate Secretary
(Principal Accounting Officer)
   
Directors:  
Art P. Beattie
Stan W. Connally
Andrew W. Evans
Thomas A. Fanning
Kimberly S. Greene
James Y. Kerr, II
Thomas A. FanningMark S. Lantrip
Kimberly S. Greene
Christopher C. Womack
  
By: /s/Melissa K. Caen
  (Melissa K. Caen, Attorney-in-fact)
Date: February 20, 201819, 2019



    Table of Contents                                Index to Financial Statements

SOUTHERN COMPANY GAS
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized. The signature of the undersigned company shall be deemed to relate only to matters having reference to such company and any subsidiaries thereof.
SOUTHERN COMPANY GAS
  
By:Andrew W. EvansKimberly S. Greene
 Chairman, President, and Chief Executive Officer
  
By:/s/Melissa K. Caen
 (Melissa K. Caen, Attorney-in-fact)
  
Date:February 20, 201819, 2019
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated. The signature of each of the undersigned shall be deemed to relate only to matters having reference to the above-named company and any subsidiaries thereof.
 
Andrew W. EvansKimberly S. Greene
Chairman, President, and Chief Executive Officer
(Principal Executive Officer)
   
    
Elizabeth W. ReeseDaniel S. Tucker
Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer, and Treasurer
(Principal Financial Officer)
   
    
Grace A. Kolvereid
Senior Vice President and Comptroller
(Principal Accounting Officer)
   
Directors:  
Sandra N. Bane
Kimberly S. Greene
Thomas D. Bell, Jr.
Charles R. Crisp
Brenda J. Gaines
John E. Rau
Charles R. Crisp
James A. Rubright
Brenda J. Gaines  
By: /s/Melissa K. Caen
  (Melissa K. Caen, Attorney-in-fact)
Date: February 20, 201819, 2019


Supplemental Information to be Furnished with Reports Filed Pursuant to Section 15(d) of the Act by Registrants Which Have Not Registered Securities Pursuant to Section 12 of the Act:

Southern Company Gas is not required to send an annual report or proxy statement to its sole shareholder and parent company, The Southern Company, and will not prepare such a report after filing this Annual Report on Form 10-K for fiscal year 2017.2018. Accordingly, Southern Company Gas will not file an annual report with the Securities and Exchange Commission.