0000200406jnj:MedicalDevicesMemberus-gaap:NonUsMemberjnj:SurgeryMember2021-01-042022-01-02
0000200406 jnj:PREZISTAPREZCOBIXREZOLSTASYMTUZAMember jnj:PharmaceuticalMember jnj:InfectiousDiseasesMember 2017-01-02 2017-12-31
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-K
ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the fiscal year ended December 29, 2019January 2, 2022
or
Transition Report Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934

for the transition period from            to
Commission file number 1-3215
1-3215

JOHNSON & JOHNSON
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
New Jersey22-1024240
(State of incorporation)(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)
One Johnson & Johnson Plaza

New Brunswick, New Jersey
08933
(Address of principal executive offices)(Zip Code)
One Johnson & Johnson Plaza
New Brunswick, New Jersey 08933
(Address of principal executive offices)

Registrant’s telephone number, including area code: (732(732) 524-0400
SECURITIES REGISTERED PURSUANT TO SECTION 12(b) OF THE ACT
Title of each classTrading SymbolName of each exchange on which registered
Common Stock, Par Value $1.00JNJNew York Stock Exchange
0.250% Notes Due January 2022JNJNew York Stock Exchange
0.650% Notes Due May 2024JNJJNJ24CNew York Stock Exchange
5.50% Notes Due November 2024JNJJNJ24BPNew York Stock Exchange
1.150% Notes Due November 2028JNJJNJ28New York Stock Exchange
1.650% Notes Due May 2035JNJJNJ35New York Stock Exchange
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act.  Yes þ     No o
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Exchange Act.  Yes o     No þ
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Exchange Act during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.  Yes þ     No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically every Interactive Data File required to be submitted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit such files).  Yes þ     No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, a smaller reporting company, or emerging growth company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer”, “smaller reporting company," and "emerging“emerging growth company"company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.
Large accelerated filerAccelerated filer
Non-accelerated filerSmaller reporting company
Emerging growth company

If an emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with any new or revised financial accounting standards provided pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act. o



Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has filed a report on and attestation to its management's assessment of the effectiveness of its internal control over financial reporting under Section 404(b) of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act (15 U.S.C. 7262(b)) by the registered public accounting firm that prepared or issued its audit report. Yes ☑     No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).  Yes      No þ
The aggregate market value of the Common Stock held by non-affiliates computed by reference to the price at which the Common Stock was last sold as of the last business day of the registrant’s most recently completed second fiscal quarter was approximately $368$445 billion.
On February 10, 2020,2022, there were 2,634,721,2572,629,268,158 shares of Common Stock outstanding.
DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE
Parts I and III:Portions of registrant’s proxy statement for its 20192022 annual meeting of shareholders filed within 120 days after the close of the registrant’s fiscal year (the "Proxy Statement"“Proxy Statement”), are incorporated by reference to this report on Form 10-K (this "Report"“Report”).





Item Page
1
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
1A.
1B.
2
3
4
 
 
5
6
7
7A.
8
9
9A.
9B.
9C.
 
10
11
12
13
14
 
15
16
 
 



Item Page
   
1
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
1A.
1B.
2
3
4
 
 
5
6
7
7A.
8
9
9A.
9B.
 
10
11
12
13
14
 
15
16
 
 






CAUTIONARY NOTE REGARDING FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS

This Annual Report on Form 10-K and Johnson & Johnson'sJohnson’s other publicly available documents contain "forward-looking statements"“forward-looking statements” within the meaning of the safe harbor provisions of the U.S.United States Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Management and representatives of Johnson & Johnson and its subsidiaries (the "Company")Company) also may from time to time make forward-looking statements. Forward-looking statements do not relate strictly to historical or current facts and reflect management’s assumptions, views, plans, objectives and projections about the future. Forward-looking statements may be identified by the use of words such as “plans,” “expects,” “will,” “anticipates,” “estimates” and other words of similar meaning in conjunction with, among other things: discussions of future operations; expected operating results and financial performance; impact of planned acquisitions and dispositions; impact and timing of restructuring initiatives, including associated cost savings and other benefits; the planned separation of the Company’s Consumer Health business; the Company’s strategy for growth; product development;development activities; regulatory approvals; market position and expenditures.

Because forward-looking statements are based on current beliefs, expectations and assumptions regarding future events, they are subject to uncertainties, risks and changes that are difficult to predict and many of which are outside of the Company'sCompany’s control. Investors should realize that if underlying assumptions prove inaccurate, or known or unknown risks or uncertainties materialize, the Company’s actual results and financial condition could vary materially from expectations and projections expressed or implied in its forward-looking statements. Investors are therefore cautioned not to rely on these forward-looking statements. Risks and uncertainties include, but are not limited to:

Risks Related to Product Development, Market Success and Competition
Challenges and uncertainties inherent in innovation and development of new and improved products and technologies on which the Company’s continued growth and success depend, including uncertainty of clinical outcomes, additional analysis of existing clinical data, obtaining regulatory approvals, health plan coverage and customer access, and initial and continued commercial success;
Challenges to the Company’s ability to obtain and protect adequate patent and other intellectual property rights for new and existing products and technologies in the United States and other important markets;
The impact of patent expirations, typically followed by the introduction of competing biosimilars and genericsgeneric, biosimilar or other products and resulting revenue and market share losses;
Increasingly aggressive and frequent challenges to the Company’s patents by competitors and others seeking to launch competing generic, biosimilar or other products and increased receptivity of courts, the United States Patent and Trademark Office and other decision makers to such challenges, potentially resulting in loss of market exclusivity and rapid decline in sales for the relevant product sooner than expected;
Competition in research and development of new and improved products, processes and technologies, which can result in product and process obsolescence;
Competition to reach agreement with third parties for collaboration, licensing, development and marketing agreements for products and technologies;
Competition based on cost-effectiveness, product performance, technological advances and patents attained by competitors; and
Allegations that the Company’s products infringe the patents and other intellectual property rights of third parties, which could adversely affect the Company’s ability to sell the products in question and require the payment of money damages and future royalties.
Risks Related to Product Liability, Litigation and Regulatory Activity
Product efficacy or safety concerns, whether or not based on scientific evidence, potentially resulting in product withdrawals, recalls, regulatory action on the part of the United States Food and Drug Administration (or international counterparts), declining sales, reputational damage, increased litigation expense and share price impact;
Impact,The impact, including declining sales and reputational damage, of significant litigation or government action adverse to the Company, including product liability claims and allegations related to pharmaceutical marketing practices and contracting strategies;
Impact



The impact of an adverse judgment or settlement and the adequacy of reserves related to legal proceedings, including patent litigation, product liability, personal injury claims, securities class actions, government investigations, employment and other legal proceedings;


Increased scrutiny of the health carehealthcare industry by government agencies and state attorneys general resulting in investigations and prosecutions, which carry the risk of significant civil and criminal penalties, including, but not limited to, debarment from government business;
Failure to meet compliance obligations in the McNEIL-PPC, Inc. Consent Decree or any other compliance agreements with governments or government agencies, which could result in significant sanctions;
Potential changes to applicable laws and regulations affecting United States and international operations, including relating to: approval of new products; licensing and patent rights; sales and promotion of health carehealthcare products; access to, and reimbursement and pricing for, health carehealthcare products and services; environmental protectionprotection; and sourcing of raw materials;
Compliance with local regulations and laws that may restrict the Company’s ability to manufacture or sell its products in relevant markets, including requirements to comply with medical device reporting regulations and other requirements such as the European Union'sUnion’s Medical Devices Regulation;
Changes in domestic and international tax laws and regulations, including changes related to The Tax Cuts and Jobs Act in the United States, the Federal Act on Tax Reform and AHV Financing in Switzerland, increasing audit scrutiny by tax authorities around the world and exposures to additional tax liabilities potentially in excess of existing reserves; and
IssuanceThe issuance of new or revised accounting standards by the Financial Accounting Standards Board and regulations by the Securities and Exchange Commission.
Risks Related to the Company’s Strategic Initiatives, and Healthcare Market Trends and the Planned Separation of the Company’s Consumer Health Business
Pricing pressures resulting from trends toward health carehealthcare cost containment, including the continued consolidation among health carehealthcare providers and other market participants, trends toward managed care, the shift toward governments increasingly becoming the primary payers of health carehealthcare expenses, significant new entrants to the health carehealthcare markets seeking to reduce costs and government pressure on companies to voluntarily reduce costs and price increases;
Restricted spending patterns of individual, institutional and governmental purchasers of health carehealthcare products and services due to economic hardship and budgetary constraints;
Challenges to the Company’s ability to realize its strategy for growth including through externally sourced innovations, such as development collaborations, strategic acquisitions, licensing and marketing agreements, and the potential heightened costs of any such external arrangements due to competitive pressures;
The potential that the expected strategic benefits and opportunities from any planned or completed acquisition or divestiture by the Company may not be realized or may take longer to realize than expected; and
The potential that the expected benefits and opportunities related to past and ongoing restructuring actions may not be realized or may take longer to realize than expected.expected;
The Company’s ability to consummate the planned separation of the Company’s Consumer Health business on a timely basis or at all;
The Company’s ability to successfully separate the Company’s Consumer Health business and realize the anticipated benefits from the planned separation; and
The New Consumer Health Company’s ability to succeed as a standalone publicly traded company.
Risks Related to Economic Conditions, Financial Markets and Operating Internationally
ImpactThe risks associated with global operations on the Company and its customers and suppliers, including foreign governments in countries in which the Company operates;
The impact of inflation and fluctuations in interest rates and currency exchange rates and the potential effect of such fluctuations on revenues, expenses and resulting margins;
Potential changes in export/import and trade laws, regulations and policies of the United States and other countries, including any increased trade restrictions or tariffs and potential drug reimportation legislation;
The impact on international operations from financial instability in international economies, sovereign risk, possible imposition of governmental controls and restrictive economic policies, and unstable international governments and legal systems;
The impact of global public health crises and pandemics, including the novel coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic;



Changes to global climate, extreme weather and natural disasters that could affect demand for the Company'sCompany’s products and services, cause disruptions in manufacturing and distribution networks, alter the availability of goods and services within the supply chain, and affect the overall design and integrity of the Company'sCompany’s products and operations; and
The impact of armed conflicts and terrorist attacks in the United States and other parts of the world, including social and economic disruptions and instability of financial and other markets.
Risks Related to Supply Chain and Operations
Difficulties and delays in manufacturing, internally, through third partythird-party providers or otherwise within the supply chain, that may lead to voluntary or involuntary business interruptions or shutdowns, product shortages, withdrawals or suspensions of products from the market, and potential regulatory action;
Interruptions and breaches of the Company'sCompany’s information technology systems or those of the Company'sCompany’s vendors, which could result in reputational, competitive, operational or other business harm as well as financial costs and regulatory action;


Reliance on global supply chains and production and distribution processes that are complex and subject to increasing regulatory requirements that may adversely affect supply, sourcing and pricing of materials used in the Company’s products; and
The potential that the expected benefits and opportunities related to restructuring actions contemplated for the global supply chain including the Company's transaction with Jabil, may not be realized or may take longer to realize than expected, including due to any required approvals from applicable regulatory authorities. Disruptions associated with the announced global supply chain actions may adversely affect supply and sourcing of materials used in the Company's products.
Investors also should carefully read the Risk Factors described in Item 1A of this Annual Report on Form 10-K for a description of certain risks that could, among other things, cause the Company’s actual results to differ materially from those expressed in its forward-looking statements. Investors should understand that it is not possible to predict or identify all such factors and should not consider the risks described above and in Item 1A to be a complete statement of all potential risks and uncertainties. The Company does not undertake to publicly update any forward-looking statement that may be made from time to time, whether as a result of new information or future events or developments.





PART I
Item 1.BUSINESS
Item 1.BUSINESS
General
Johnson & Johnson and its subsidiaries (the Company) have approximately 132,200141,700 employees worldwide engaged in the research and development, manufacture and sale of a broad range of products in the health carehealthcare field. Johnson & Johnson is a holding company, with operating companies conducting business in virtually all countries of the world. The Company’s primary focus is products related to human health and well-being. Johnson & Johnson was incorporated in the State of New Jersey in 1887.
The Executive Committee of Johnson & Johnson is the principal management group responsible for the strategic operations and allocation of the resources of the Company. This Committee oversees and coordinates the activities of the Company's three business segments: Consumer Health, Pharmaceutical and Medical Devices. Within the strategic parameters provided by the Committee, senior management groups at U.S. and international operating companies are each responsible for their own strategic plans and the day-to-day operations of those companies. Each subsidiary within the business segments is, with limited exceptions, managed by residents of the country where located.
Segments of Business
The Company is organized into three business segments: Consumer Health, Pharmaceutical and Medical Devices. Additional information required by this item is incorporated herein by reference to the narrative and tabular descriptions of segments and operating results under: “Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Results of Operations and Financial Condition” of this Report; and Note 1817 “Segments of Business and Geographic Areas” of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements included in Item 8 of this Report.
Consumer Health
The Consumer Health segment includes a broad range of products focused on personal healthcare used in the beauty, over-the-counter pharmaceutical, baby care, oral care, women’s healthSkin Health/Beauty, Over-the-Counter medicines, Baby Care, Oral Care, Women’s Health and wound careWound Care markets. Major brands in Skin Health/Beauty include the AVEENO®; CLEAN & CLEAR®; DR. CI:LABO®; NEUTROGENA® and OGX® product lines. Over-the-counterOver-the-Counter (OTC) medicines include the broad family of TYLENOL® acetaminophen products; SUDAFED® cold, flu and allergy products; BENADRYL® and ZYRTEC® allergy products; MOTRIN® IB ibuprofen products; NICORETTE® smoking cessation products outside the U.S.; ZARBEE’S NATURALS® products, inspired by nature, and the PEPCID® line of acid reflux products. Baby Care includes the JOHNSON’S® and AVEENO Baby® line of products. Oral Care includes the LISTERINE® product line. Major brands in Women’s Health outside of North America are STAYFREE® and CAREFREE® sanitary pads and o.b.® tampon brands. Wound Care brands include the BAND-AID® Brand Adhesive Bandages and NEOSPORIN® First Aid product lines. These products are marketed to the general public and sold online (eCommerce) and to retail outlets and distributors throughout the world.
In November 2021, the Company announced its intention to separate the Company’s Consumer Health business, with the intention to create a new, publicly traded company. The Company is targeting completion of the planned separation in 18 to 24 months after initial announcement.
Pharmaceutical
The Pharmaceutical segment is focused on six therapeutic areas: Immunology (e.g., rheumatoid arthritis, psoriatic arthritis, inflammatory bowel disease and psoriasis), Infectious Diseases (e.g., HIV/AIDS)AIDS and COVID-19), Neuroscience (e.g., mood disorders, neurodegenerative disorders and schizophrenia), Oncology (e.g., prostate cancer, hematologic malignancies, lung cancer and hematologic malignancies)bladder cancer), Cardiovascular and Metabolism (e.g., thrombosis, diabetes and diabetes)macular degeneration) and Pulmonary Hypertension (e.g., Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension). Medicines in this segment are distributed directly to retailers, wholesalers, distributors, hospitals and health carehealthcare professionals for prescription use. Key products in the Pharmaceutical segment include: REMICADE® (infliximab), a treatment for a number of immune-mediated inflammatory diseases; SIMPONI® (golimumab), a subcutaneous treatment for adults with moderate to severe rheumatoid arthritis, active psoriatic arthritis, active ankylosing spondylitis and moderately active to severely active ulcerative colitis; SIMPONI ARIA® (golimumab), an intravenous treatment for adults with moderate to severe rheumatoid arthritis, active psoriatic arthritis and active ankylosing spondylitis;spondylitis and active polyarticular juvenile idiopathic arthritis (pJIA) in people 2 years of age and older; STELARA® (ustekinumab), a treatment for adults and children with moderate to severe plaque psoriasis, for adults with active psoriatic arthritis, for adults with moderately to severely active Crohn's disease and treatment of moderately to severely active ulcerative colitis; TREMFYA® (guselkumab), a treatment for adults with moderate to severe plaque psoriasis;psoriasis and active psoriatic arthritis; the Janssen COVID-19 vaccine, authorized for use under Emergency Use Authorization (EUA) for active immunization to prevent coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) caused by severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) in individuals 18 years of age and older; EDURANT® (rilpivirine), PREZISTA® (darunavir) and PREZCOBIX®/REZOLSTA® (darunavir/cobicistat), antiretroviral medicines for the treatment of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV-1) in combination with other antiretroviral products and SYMTUZA® (darunavir/cobicistat/emtricitabine/tenofovir alafenamide), a once-daily single tablet regimen for the treatment of HIV; CONCERTA® (methylphenidate HCl) extended-release tablets CII, a treatment
1


for attention deficit hyperactivity disorder; INVEGA SUSTENNA®/XEPLION® (paliperidone palmitate), for the treatment of schizophrenia and schizoaffective disorder in adults; INVEGA TRINZA®/TREVICTA® (paliperidone palmitate), for the treatment of schizophrenia in patients after they have been adequately treated with INVEGA SUSTENNA® for at least four months; RISPERDAL CONSTA® (risperidone long-acting injection), for the treatment of schizophrenia and the

1


maintenance treatment of Bipolar 1 Disorder in adults; ZYTIGA® (abiraterone acetate), a treatment for metastatic castration-resistantpatients with prostate cancer (CRPC) and metastatic high-risk castration-sensitivecancer; ERLEADA® (apalutamide), a next-generation androgen receptor inhibitor for the treatment of patients with prostate cancer; IMBRUVICA® (ibrutinib), a treatment for certain B-cell malignancies, or blood cancers and chronic graft versus host disease and Waldenström's Macroglobulinemia;disease; DARZALEX® (daratumumab), a treatment for relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma; VELCADEDARZALEX FASPRO® (bortezomib)(daratumumab and hyaluronidase-fihj), a treatment for multiple myeloma mantle cell lymphoma;and light chain (AL) Amyloidosis; PROCRIT®/EPREX® (epoetin alfa), a treatment for chemotherapy-induced anemia and patients with chronic kidney disease; XARELTO® (rivaroxaban), an oral anticoagulant for the prevention of deep vein thrombosis (DVT), which may lead to pulmonary embolism (PE) in patients undergoing hip or knee replacement surgery, to reduce the risk of stroke and systemic embolism in patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation, and for the treatment and reduction of risk of recurrence of DVT and PE;PE to reduce the risk of major cardiovascular events in patients with coronary artery disease (CAD) and peripheral artery disease (PAD), for the treatment and secondary prevention of thromboembolism in pediatric patients, and for thromboprophylaxis in pediatric patients following the Fontan procedure; INVOKANA® (canagliflozin), for the treatment of adults with type 2 diabetes; INVOKAMET®/VOKANAMET® (canagliflozin/metformin HCl), a combination therapy of fixed doses of canagliflozin and metformin hydrochloride for the treatment of adults with type 2 diabetes; and INVOKAMET® XR (canagliflozin/metformin hydrochloride extended-release), a once-daily, fixed-dose combination therapy of canagliflozin and metformin hydrochloride extended-release, for the treatment of adults with type 2 diabetes; OPSUMIT® (macitentan) as monotherapy or in combination, indicated for the long-term treatment of pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH); UPTRAVI® (selexipag), the only approved oral and intravenous, selective IP receptor agonist targeting a prostacyclin pathway in PAH. Many of these medicines were developed in collaboration with strategic partners or are licensed from other companies and maintain active lifecycle development programs.
Medical Devices
The Medical Devices segment includes a broad range of products used in the orthopaedic,Interventional Solutions, Orthopaedics, Surgery, and Vision fields. Medical Devices in Interventional Solutions include Electrophysiology products (Biosense Webster) to treat cardiovascular diseases, Neurovascular care (Cerenovus) that treats hemorrhagic and ischemic stroke; the Orthopaedics portfolio (DePuy Synthes) is comprised of products in support of Hips, Knees, Trauma, and Spine, Sports & Other; the Surgery portfolios include advanced and general surgery interventionalofferings (Ethicon), solutions (cardiovascularthat focus on Breast Aesthetics (Mentor) and neurovascular)Ear, Nose and eye health fields.Throat (Acclarent) procedures; and Johnson & Johnson Vision products such as ACUVUE® Brand disposable contact lenses and ophthalmic products related to cataract and laser refractive surgery. These products are distributed to wholesalers, hospitals and retailers, and used principallypredominantly in the professional fields by physicians, nurses, hospitals, eye care professionals and clinics. They include orthopaedic products; general surgery, biosurgical, endomechanical and energy products; electrophysiology productsBeginning in the fiscal first quarter of 2022, the Medical Devices segment will be referred to treat cardiovascular disease; and vision products such as disposable contact lenses and ophthalmic products related to cataract and laser refractive surgery.the MedTech segment.
Geographic Areas
Johnson & Johnson and its subsidiaries (the Company) have approximately 132,200141,700 employees worldwide engaged in the research and development, manufacture and sale of a broad range of products in the health carehealthcare field. The Company conducts business in virtually all countries of the world with the primary focus on products related to human health and well-being.
The products made and sold in the international business include many of those described above under “– Segments of Business – Consumer Health,” “– Pharmaceutical” and “– Medical Devices.” However, the principal markets, products and methods of distribution in the international business vary with the country and the culture. The products sold in international business include those developed in the U.S. and by subsidiaries abroad.
Investments and activities in some countries outside the U.S. are subject to higher risks than comparable U.S. activities because the investment and commercial climate may be influenced by financial instability in international economies, restrictive economic policies and political and legal system uncertainties.
Raw Materials
Raw materials essential to the Company's business are generally readily available from multiple sources. Where there are exceptions, the temporary unavailability of those raw materials would not likely have a material adverse effect on the financial results of the Company.
Patents
The Company's subsidiaries have made a practice of obtaining patent protection on their products and processes where possible. They own, or are licensed under, a significant number of patents in the U.S. and other countries relating to their products, product uses, formulations and manufacturing processes, which in the aggregate are believed to be of material importance to the Company in the operation of its businesses. The Company’s subsidiaries face patent challenges from third parties, including challenges seeking to manufacture and market generic and biosimilar versions of the Company's key pharmaceutical products prior to expiration of the applicable patents covering those products. Significant legal proceedings and
2


claims involving the Company's patent and other intellectual property are described in Note 21,19, “Legal Proceedings—Intellectual Property” of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements included in Item 8 of this Report.
Sales of the Company’s largest product, STELARA® (ustekinumab), accounted for approximately 7.8%9.7% of the Company's total revenues for fiscal 2019.2021. Accordingly, the patents related to this product are believed to be material to the Company.

2


There is one set of granted patents related specifically to STELARA®. This set of patents is owned by Janssen Biotech, Inc., a wholly-owned subsidiary of Johnson & Johnson. TheseJohnson, owns patents arespecifically related to STELARA®.The latest expiring United States composition of matter patent expires in force2023. The latest expiring European composition of matter patent expires in the U.S. and many countries outside the U.S. In the U.S., the latest projected expiration date for patents in this set is 2023 due to patent term extension and adjustment. In most of Europe, the latest projected expiration date for patents in this set is 2024 due to a Supplementary Protection Certificate (patent term extension). In most other countries, the latest projected expiration date is 2021.2024.
In addition to competing in the immunology market with STELARA
®, the Company is currently marketing SIMPONI® (golimumab) and SIMPONI ARIA® (golimumab), next generation immunology products. Patents related to these products are in force and the latest projected U.S. expiration date is 2024 due to patent term extension and adjustment. The Company also markets REMICADE® (infliximab) in the immunology market which isSales of the Company’s 2ndsecond largest product. Patents on this product, have expiredcollectively DARZALEX® (daratumumab) and DARZALEX FASPRO® (daratumumab and hyaluronidase-fihj), accounted for approximately 6.4% of the Food and Drug Administration approved the first infliximab biosimilarCompany's total revenues for sale in the U.S. in 2016, and a number of such products have been launched since then. For a more extensive description of legal matters regardingfiscal 2021. Accordingly, the patents related to REMICADEthis product are believed to be material to the Company. Genmab A/S owns two patent families related to DARZALEX®, see Note 21 “Legal Proceedings - Intellectual Property - Pharmaceutical - REMICADEand Janssen Biotech, Inc. has an exclusive license to those patent families. The two patent families both expire in the United States in 2029. The latest expiring licensed European patent expires in 2032. Janssen Biotech, Inc. owns a separate patent portfolio related to DARZALEX FASPRO® Related Cases” of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements included in Item 8 of this Report..

Trademarks
The Company’s subsidiaries have made a practice of selling their products under trademarks and of obtaining protection for these trademarks by all available means. These trademarks are protected by registration in the U.S. and other countries where such products are marketed. The Company considers these trademarks in the aggregate to be of material importance in the operation of its businesses.
Seasonality
Worldwide sales do not reflect any significant degree of seasonality; however, spending has been heavier in the fourth quarter of each year than in other quarters. This reflects increased spending decisions, principally for advertising and research and development activity.
Competition
In all of their product lines, the Company's subsidiaries compete with companies both locally and globally. Competition exists in all product lines without regard to the number and size of the competing companies involved. Competition in research, both internally and externally sourced, involving the development and the improvement of new and existing products and processes, is particularly significant. The development of new and innovative products, as well as protecting the underlying intellectual property of the Company’s product portfolio, is important to the Company's success in all areas of its business. The competitive environment requires substantial investments in continuing research. In addition, the development and maintenance of customer demand for the Company’s consumer products involve significant expenditures for advertising and promotion.
Environment
The Company is subject to a variety of U.S. and international environmental protection measures. The Company believes that its operations comply in all material respects with applicable environmental laws and regulations. The Company’s compliance with these requirements did not change during the past year, and is not expected to have a material effect upon its capital expenditures, cash flows, earnings or competitive position.
Regulation
The Company’s businesses are subject to varying degrees of governmental regulation in the countries in which operations are conducted, and the general trend is toward increasingly stringent regulation and enforcement. We areThe Company is subject to costly and complex U.S. and foreign laws and governmental regulations and any adverse regulatory action may materially adversely affect ourthe Company's financial condition and business operations. In the U.S., the drug, device and cosmetic industries have long been subject to regulation by various federal and state agencies, primarily as to product safety, efficacy, manufacturing, advertising, labeling and safety reporting. The exercise of broad regulatory powers by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (the U.S. FDA) continues to result in increases in the amounts of testing and documentation required for U.S. FDA approval of new drugs and devices and a corresponding increase in the expense of product introduction. Similar trends are also evident in major markets outside of the U.S. The new medical device regulatory framework and the new privacy regulations in Europe and in other countries are examples of such increased regulation.
The regulatory agencies under whose purview the Company operates have administrative powers that may subject it to actions such as product withdrawals, recalls, seizure of products and other civil and criminal sanctions. In some cases, the Company’s subsidiaries may deem it advisable to initiate product recalls.

3



The U.S. FDA and regulatory agencies around the globe are also increasing their enforcement activities. If the U.S. FDA were to conclude that we are not in compliance with applicable laws or regulations, or that any of our drugs or medical
3


devices are ineffective or pose an unreasonable health risk, the U.S. FDA could ban such products, detain or seize adulterated or misbranded products, order a recall, repair, replacement, or refund of such products, refuse to grant pending applications for marketing authorization or require certificates of foreign governments for exports, and/or require us to notify health professionals and others that the products present unreasonable risks of substantial harm to the public health. The U.S. FDA may also assess civil or criminal penalties against us, our officers or employees and impose operating restrictions on a company-wide basis, or enjoin and/or restrain certain conduct resulting in violations of applicable law. The U.S. FDA may also recommend prosecution to the USU.S. Department of Justice. Any adverse regulatory action, depending on its magnitude, may restrict us from effectively marketing and selling our products and limit our ability to obtain future clearances or approvals, and could result in a substantial modification to our business practices and operations. Equivalent enforcement mechanisms exist in different countries in which we conduct business.
The costs of human health carehealthcare have been and continue to be a subject of study, investigation and regulation by governmental agencies and legislative bodies around the world. In the U.S., attention has been focused by states, regulatory agencies and congress on drug prices and profits and programs that encourage doctors to write prescriptions for particular drugs, or to recommend, use or purchase particular medical devices. Laws and regulations have been enacted to require adherence to strict compliance standards and prevent fraud and abuse in the healthcare industry.There is increased focus on interactions and financial relationships between healthcare companies and health care providers and varioushealthcare providers. Various transparency laws and regulations require disclosures of financial relationships between companiespayments and health care providers.other transfers of value made to physicians and teaching hospitals and, beginning with disclosures in 2022, to certain non-physician practitioners. Federal and foreign laws governing international business practices require strict compliance with anti-bribery standards and certain prohibitions with respect to payments to any foreign government official. Payers have become a more potent force in the market place and increased attention is being paid to drug and medical device pricing, appropriate drug and medical device utilization and the quality and costs of health carehealthcare generally.
U.S. government agenciesactors continue efforts to repeal, and modify, or invalidate provisions of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (the ACA) which passed in 2010. For example, federal legislation repealed the ACA’s individual mandate tax penalty as well as the tax on generous employer-sponsored healthcare plans; CMSthe Center for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) began permitting states to impose work requirements on persons covered by Medicaid expansion plans; certain federal subsidies to insurers have ended; and certain short-term insurance plans not offering the full array of ACA benefits have been allowed to extend in duration. Some of these changes are being challenged in U.S. courts and so their long-term impact remains uncertain. The ACA has also been subject to judicial challenge. In November 2020, the U.S. Supreme Court heard argument in Texas v. Azar, which challenges the constitutionality of the ACA. Pending resolution of the litigation, all of the ACA but the individual mandate to buy health insurance remains in effect.The U.S. government also continues to propose and implement changes to the Medicare Part D benefit including the size of manufacturer discounts in the coverage gap and catastrophic phases of the benefit. There are a number of additional bills pending in Congress and healthcare reform proposals at the state level that would affect drug pricing in the Medicare and Medicaid programs. This changing federal landscape has both positive and negative impacts on the U.S. healthcare industry with much remaining uncertain as to how various provisions of federal law, and potential modification or repeal of these laws, will ultimately affect the industry.
In addition, business practices in the health carehealthcare industry have come under increased scrutiny, particularly in the U.S., by government agencies and state attorneys general, and resulting investigations and prosecutions carry the risk of significant civil and criminal penalties.
Further, the Company relies on global supply chains, and production and distribution processes, that are complex, are subject to increasing regulatory requirements, and may be faced with unexpected changes such as those resulting from the COVID-19 pandemic and Brexit that may affect sourcing, supply and pricing of materials used in the Company's products. These processes also are subject to complex and lengthy regulatory approvals.
The global regulatory landscape is also subject to change as the COVID-19 pandemic continues to affect the U.S. and global economies. The U.S. FDA and other health authorities have shifted resources and priorities to meet the many challenges presented by the pandemic. Pandemic-related disruptions could negatively impact the processing of regulatory submissions and slow agency review times necessary for the approval or clearance of new drugs and devices. The duration and severity of the COVID-19 pandemic is unpredictable and difficult to assess.

4


Employees and Human Capital Management

As of January 2, 2022 and January 3, 2021, the number of employees were approximately:
2021 2020 
Employees1
144,300 136,400 
Full-time equivalent (FTE) positions2
141,700 134,500 

1“Employee” is defined as an individual working full-time or part-time, excluding fixed term employees, interns and co-op employees. Employee data may not include full population from more recently acquired companies and individuals on long-term disability are excluded. Contingent workers, contractors and subcontractors are also excluded.
2 FTE represents the total number of full-time equivalent positions and does not reflect the total number of individual employees as some work part-time.

jnj-20220102_g1.jpg
Strategy
The Company believes that its employees are critical to its continued success and are an essential element of its long-term strategy. Management is responsible for ensuring that its policies and processes reflect and reinforce the Company's desired corporate culture, including policies and processes related to strategy, risk management, and ethics and compliance. The Company’s human capital management strategy is built on three fundamental focus areas:
Attracting and recruiting the best talent
Developing and retaining talent
Empowering and inspiring talent
Underpinning these focus areas are ongoing efforts to cultivate and foster a culture built on diversity, equity and inclusion (DEI), innovation, health, well-being and safety, where the Company's employees are encouraged to succeed both professionally and personally while helping the Company achieve its business goals.
Culture and Employee Engagement
At Johnson & Johnson, employees are guided by Our Credo which sets forth the Company's responsibilities to patients, consumers, customers, healthcare professionals, employees, communities and shareholders. Employees worldwide are further guided by the Company’s Code of Business Conduct which sets basic requirements for business conduct and serves as a foundation for the Company policies, procedures and guidelines, all of which provide additional guidance on expected employee behaviors in every market where it operates. The Company conducts global surveys that offer its employees the ability to provide feedback and valuable insight to help address potential human resources risks and identify opportunities to improve. In 2021, 91% of global employees across 77 countries participated in Our Voice Survey which was offered in 36 languages.
Growth and Development
To continue to lead in the changing healthcare landscape, it is crucial that the Company continue to attract and retain top talent. The Company believes that its employees must be equipped with the right knowledge and skills and be provided with opportunities to grow and develop in their careers. Accordingly, professional development programs and educational resources
5
5




are available to all employees. The Company's objective is to foster a learning culture that helps shape each person’s unique career path while creating a robust pipeline of talent to deliver on the Company’s long-term strategies. In furtherance of this objective, the Company deploys a global approach to ensure development is for everyone, regardless of where they are on their career journey. In 2021, 45.8% of employees in Manager and above job categories took advantage of career opportunities by moving across functions, country or business segment lines (including upward promotion or lateral transfer and excluding employees in the research and development organizations). The Company's voluntary turnover rate was 8%.
Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion (DEI)
The Company is committed to workplace diversity and to cultivating, fostering, and advancing a culture of equity and inclusion. Enabling employees to perform at their best while being themselves is fundamental to the Company's continued success. The Company’s DEI vision is: Be yourself, change the world. The Company's DEI strategy focuses on three pillars that reflect the strategic priorities identified to enable the Company to address the challenges and opportunities presented by this evolving understanding of diversity:
Accelerate the Company’s efforts to advance a culture of inclusion and innovation
Build a diverse workforce for the future
Enhance business results and reputation
The Company's DEI strategy is guided by internal and external insights, global best practices and continual employee feedback which remind the Company that while diversity changes by location, inclusion is the same everywhere.
Compensation and Benefits
As part of the Company's total rewards philosophy, the Company offers competitive compensation and benefits to attract and retain top talent. The Company is committed to fairness and equitable treatment in its compensation and benefits for employees at all levels. The Company observes legal minimum wage provisions and exceeds them where possible. The Company's total rewards offerings include an array of programs to support its employees' financial, physical, and mental well-being, including annual performance incentive opportunities, pension and retirement savings programs, health and welfare benefits, paid time off, leave programs, flexible work schedules and employee assistance programs.
Health, Wellness and Safety
The Company’s investment in employee health, well-being and safety is built on its conviction that advancing health for humanity starts with advancing the health of its employees. With the right awareness, focus, practices and tools, the Company ensures that all its employees around the world, as well as temporary contractors and visitors to the Company's sites, can work safely. The Company has continuously expanded health and well-being programs throughout the Company and across the globe, incorporating new thinking and technologies to keep its offerings best-in-class and to help employees achieve their personal health goals. The programs and practices the Company advances for total health—physical, mental, emotional and financial—help ensure employee health protection from emerging health risks.

Safety and COVID-19 Pandemic Response
Protecting and supporting our employees during the COVID-19 pandemic continues to be a top priority and our approach includes: keeping employees informed of local COVID-19 transmission rates and corresponding risk levels; promoting the health and safety of our employees in the workplace through robust layers of protection; enhanced cleaning and access to cleaning supplies and personal protective equipment; supporting employees with pay continuity, benefits and well-being tools; and recognizing extraordinary employee contributions at work and in our communities. In 2021, in recognition of the new way of working, we initiated J&J Flex, a hybrid model that empowers our office-based employees to find the right productivity and balance of in-person and remote work. This model allows for work to happen seamlessly across a variety of workplaces and is enabled by an array of enhanced collaboration tools and technology to optimize productivity and connection. J&J Flex rolled out in fourth quarter 2021 globally, and will continue deployment through 2022 as protocol and requirements related to the COVID-19 pandemic allow. The Company is evaluating flexible work strategies for its on-site workforce, such as virtual on-boarding and training, to help our employees balance their personal and professional lives. Also, we continued to enhance our benefits offerings with access to wellness tools, on-site vaccine clinics, mental health support resources and delivery of at-home testing kits. In addition, as COVID-19 vaccines were broadly distributed and administered in 2021, including the one developed by Johnson & Johnson, we adopted policies in the U.S., Puerto Rico, and certain other countries to require proof of vaccination from Johnson & Johnson employees and contingent workers, in order to return to our sites, where permitted by local law and regulation. In the U.S. and Puerto Rico, this requirement took effect on October 4, 2021, with processes established for granting accommodations to those with medical or religious needs. Select manufacturing and distribution employees and contractors in the U.S. and Puerto Rico, as well as certain additional countries, are adopting similar policies through early 2022.

6


Available Information
The Company’s main corporate website address is www.jnj.com. www.jnj.com. All of the Company’s SEC filings are also available on the Company’s website at www.investor.jnj.com/sec.cfm, as soon as reasonably practicable after having been electronically filed or furnished to the SEC. All SEC filings are also available at the SEC’s website at www.sec.gov.
Investors and the public should note that the Company also announces information at www.factsaboutourprescriptionopioids.com, and www.factsabouttalc.com and www.LTLManagementInformation.com.
We use these websites to communicate with investors and the public about our products, litigation and other matters. It is possible that the information we post to these websites could be deemed to be material information. Therefore, we encourage investors and others interested in the Company to review the information posted to these websites in conjunction with www.jnj.com, the Company'sSEC filings, press releases, public conference calls and webcasts.
In addition, the Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation, By-Laws, the written charters of the Audit Committee, the Compensation & Benefits Committee, the Nominating & Corporate Governance Committee, the Regulatory Compliance Committee, and the Science, Technology & Sustainability Committee and any special committee of the Board of Directors and the Company’s Principles of Corporate Governance, Code of Business Conduct (for employees), Code of Business Conduct & Ethics for Members of the Board of Directors and Executive Officers, and other corporate governance materials, are available at www.investor.jnj.com/gov.cfm on the Company's website and will be provided without charge to any shareholder submitting a written request, as

4


provided above. The information on www.jnj.com, www.factsaboutourprescriptionopioids.com,www.factsabouttalc.com and www.factsabouttalc.comwww.LTLManagementInformation.com is not, and will not be deemed, a part of this Report or incorporated into any other filings the Company makes with the SEC.

57



Item 1A.    RISK FACTORS

Item 1A.RISK FACTORS
An investment in the Company’s common stock or debt securities involves risks and uncertainties. The Company faces a number ofseeks to identify, manage and mitigate risks to our business, but uncertainties and risks that are difficult to predict and many of which are outside of the Company's control.Company’s control and cannot therefore be eliminated. In addition to the other information in this report and the Company’s other filings with the SEC, investors should consider carefully the factors set forth below. Investors should be aware that it is not possible to predict or identify all such factors and that the following is not meant to be a complete discussion of all potential risks or uncertainties. If known or unknown risks or uncertainties materialize, the Company’s business, results of operations or financial condition could be adversely affected, potentially in a material way.
Global sales in the Company’s pharmaceutical
Risks Related to Our Business, Industry and medical devices segments may be negatively impacted by healthcare reforms and increasing pricing pressures.
Sales of the Company’s pharmaceutical and medical device products are significantly affected by reimbursements by third-party payers such as government healthcare programs, private insurance plans and managed care organizations. As part of various efforts to contain healthcare costs, these payers are putting downward pressure on prices at which products will be reimbursed. In the U.S., increased purchasing power of entities that negotiate on behalf of Medicare, Medicaid, and private sector beneficiaries, in part due to continued consolidation among health care providers, could result in further pricing pressures. In addition, increased political scrutiny could result in additional pricing pressures. Outside the U.S., numerous major markets, including the EU and Japan, have pervasive government involvement in funding healthcare and, in that regard, directly or indirectly impose price controls, limit access to, or reimbursement for, the Company’s products, or reduce the value of its intellectual property protection.
The Company is subject to significant legal proceedings that can result in significant expenses, fines and reputational damage.Operations
In the ordinary course of business, Johnson & Johnson and its subsidiaries are subject to numerous claims and lawsuits involving various issues such as patent disputes, product liability and claims that their product sales, marketing and pricing practices violate various antitrust, unfair trade practices and/or consumer protection laws. The most significant of these proceedings are described in Note 21, “Legal Proceedings” under Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements included in Item 8 of this Report. Litigation, in general, and securities, derivative action, class action and multi-district litigation, in particular, can be expensive and disruptive. Some of these matters may include thousands of plaintiffs or may be determined to be class actions and may involve parties seeking large and/or indeterminate amounts, including punitive or exemplary damages, and may remain unresolved for several years. For example, the Company is a defendant in numerous lawsuits arising out of the use of body powders containing talc, primarily JOHNSONS
® Baby Powder, and the Company’s sale, manufacturing and marketing of opioids.While the Company believes it has substantial defenses in these matters, it is not feasible to predict the ultimate outcome of litigation. The Company could in the future be required to pay significant amounts as a result of settlements or judgments in these matters, potentially in excess of accruals, including matters where the Company could be held jointly and severally liable among other defendants. The resolution of, or increase in accruals for, one or more of these matters in any reporting period could have a material adverse effect on the Company's results of operations and cash flows for that period. Furthermore, as a result of cost and availability factors, effective November 1, 2005, the Company ceased purchasing third-party product liability insurance.
Product reliability, safety and effectiveness concerns can have significant negative impacts on sales and results of operations, lead to litigation and cause reputational damage.
Concerns about product safety, whether raised internally or by litigants, regulators or consumer advocates, and whether or not based on scientific evidence, can result in safety alerts, product recalls, governmental investigations, regulatory action on the part of the FDA (or its counterpart in other countries), private claims and lawsuits, payment of fines and settlements, declining sales and reputational damage. These circumstances can also result in damage to brand image, brand equity and consumer trust in the Company’s products. Product recalls have in the past, and could in the future, prompt government investigations and inspections, the shutdown of manufacturing facilities, continued product shortages and related sales declines, significant remediation costs, reputational damage, possible civil penalties and criminal prosecution.
Changes in tax laws or exposures to additional tax liabilities could negatively impact the Company’s operating results.
Changes in tax laws or regulations around the world could negatively impact the Company’s effective tax rate and results of operations. A change in statutory tax rate in any country would result in the revaluation of the Company’s deferred tax assets and liabilities related to that particular jurisdiction in the period in which the new tax law is enacted. This change would result in an expense or benefit recorded to the Company’s Consolidated Statement of Earnings. The Company closely monitors these proposals as they arise in the countries where it operates. Changes to the statutory tax rate may occur at any time, and any related expense or benefit recorded may be material to the fiscal quarter and year in which the law change is enacted.


6


In fiscal year 2019, Switzerland enacted the Federal Act on Tax Reform and AHV Financing (TRAF) which became effective on January 1, 2020. As of December 29, 2019, certain cantons where the Company operates have not yet enacted portions of the tax reform as stipulated in the Swiss Federal law. These enactments and future possible guidance from the applicable taxing authorities may have a material impact on the Company’s operating results.

See Note 8 on income taxes for additional information.

The Company conducts business and files tax returns in numerous countries and is addressing tax audits and disputes with many tax authorities. In connection with the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development Base Erosion and Profit Shifting (BEPS) project, companies are required to disclose more information to tax authorities on operations around the world, which may lead to greater audit scrutiny of profits earned in other countries. The Company regularly assesses the likely outcomes of its tax audits and disputes to determine the appropriateness of its tax reserves. However, any tax authority could take a position on tax treatment that is contrary to the Company’s expectations, which could result in tax liabilities in excess of reserves.

The Company may not be able to successfully secure and defend intellectual property rights essential to the Company’s businesses.
The Company owns or licenses a significant number of patents and other proprietary rights, determined by patent offices, courts and lawmakers in various countries, relating to its products and manufacturing processes. These rights are essential to the Company’s businesses and materially important to the Company’s results of operations. Public policy, both within and outside the U.S., has become increasingly unfavorable toward intellectual property rights. The Company cannot be certain that it will obtain adequate patent protection for new products and technologies in the U.S. and other important markets or that such protections, once granted, will last as long as originally anticipated.
Competitors routinely challenge the validity or extent of the Company’s owned or licensed patents and proprietary rights through litigation, interferences, oppositions and other proceedings. These proceedings absorb resources and can be protracted as well as unpredictable. In addition, challenges that the Company’s products infringe the patents of third parties could result in the need to pay past damages and future royalties and adversely affect the competitive position and sales of the products in question.
The Company has faced increasing patent challenges from third parties seeking to manufacture and market generic and biosimilar versions of the Company's key pharmaceutical products prior to expiration of the applicable patents covering those products. In the U.S., manufacturers of generic versions of innovative human pharmaceutical products may challenge the validity, or claim non-infringement, of innovator products through the Abbreviated New Drug Application, or ANDA, process with the FDA. The Biologics Price Competition and Innovation Act (BPCIA), enacted in 2010, which created a new regulatory pathway for the approval by the FDA of biosimilar alternatives to innovator-developed biological products, also created mechanisms for biosimilar applicants to challenge the patents on the innovator biologics. The inter partes review (IPR) process with the USPTO, created under the 2011 America Invents Act, is also being used by competitors to challenge patents held by the Company’s subsidiaries.
In the event the Company is not successful in defending its patents against such challenges, or upon the “at-risk” launch (despite pending patent infringement litigation) by the generic or biosimilar firm of its product, the Company can lose a major portion of revenues for the referenced product in a very short period of time. Current legal proceedings involving the Company’s patents and other intellectual property rights are described in Note 21, “Legal Proceedings—Intellectual Property” of the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements included in Item 8 of this Report.
The Company’s businesses operate in highly competitive product markets and competitive pressures could adversely affect the Company’s earnings.
The Company faces substantial competition in all three operating segments and in all geographic markets. The Company’s businesses compete with companies of all sizes on the basis of cost-effectiveness, technological innovations, intellectual property rights, product performance, real or perceived product advantages, pricing and availability and rate of reimbursement. The Company also competes with other market participants in securing rights to acquisitions, collaborations and licensing agreements with third parties. Competition for rights to product candidates and technologies may result in significant investment and acquisition costs and onerous agreement terms for the Company. Competitors’ development of more effective or less costly products, and/or their ability to secure patent and other intellectual property rights and successfully market products ahead of the Company, could negatively impact sales of the Company’s existing products as well as its ability to bring new products to market despite significant prior investment in the related product development.

7


For the Company’s pharmaceuticalPharmaceutical businesses, loss of patent exclusivity for a product often is followed by a substantial reduction in sales as competitors gain regulatory approval for generic and other competing products and enter the market. Similar competition can be triggered by the loss of exclusivity for a biological product. For the Company’s medical deviceMedical Devices businesses, technological innovation, product quality, reputation and customer service are especially important to competitiveness. Development by other companies of new or improved products, processes and technologies could threaten to make the Company’s products or technologies less desirable, less economical or obsolete. The Company’s consumerConsumer Health businesses face intense competition from other branded products and retailers’ private-label brands. If the Company fails to sufficiently differentiate and market its brand name consumer products, this could adversely affect revenues and profitability of those products.

Interruptions and delays in manufacturing operations could adversely affect the Company’s business, sales and reputation.
The Company’s manufacture of products requires the timely delivery of sufficient amounts of complex, high-quality components and materials. The Company’s subsidiaries operate 85 manufacturing facilities as well as sourcing from thousands of suppliers around the world. The Company has in the past, and may in the future, face unanticipated interruptions and delays in manufacturing through its internal or external supply chain. Manufacturing disruptions can occur for many reasons including regulatory action, production quality deviations or safety issues, labor disputes, labor shortages, site-specific incidents (such as fires), natural disasters such as hurricanes and other severe weather events, raw material shortages, political unrest, terrorist attacks and epidemics or pandemics. Such delays and difficulties in manufacturing can result in product shortages, declines in sales and reputational impact as well as significant remediation and related costs associated with addressing the shortage.

The Company relies on third parties to manufacture certain of our products. Any failure by or loss of a third-party manufacturer could result in delays and increased costs, which may adversely affect our business.
The Company relies on third parties to manufacture certain of our products. We depend on these third-party manufacturers to allocate to us a portion of their manufacturing capacity sufficient to meet our needs, to produce products of acceptable quality and at acceptable manufacturing yields and to deliver those products to us on a timely basis and at acceptable prices. However, we cannot guarantee that these third-party manufacturers will be able to meet our near-term or long-term manufacturing requirements, which could result in lost sales and have an adverse effect on our business.

Other risks associated with our reliance on third parties to manufacture these products include reliance on the third party for regulatory compliance and quality assurance, misappropriation of the Company’s intellectual property, limited ability to manage our inventory, possible breach of the manufacturing agreement by the third party and the possible termination or nonrenewal of the manufacturing agreement by the third party at a time that is costly or inconvenient for us. Moreover, if any of our third-party manufacturers suffers any damage to facilities, loses benefits under material agreements, experiences power outages, encounters financial difficulties, is unable to secure necessary raw materials from its suppliers or suffers any other reduction in efficiency, the Company may experience significant business disruption. In the event of any such disruption, the
8


Company would need to seek and source other qualified third-party manufacturers, likely resulting in further delays and increased costs which could affect our business adversely.

Counterfeit versions of our products could harm our patients and have a negative impact on our revenues, earnings, reputation and business.
Our industry continues to be challenged by the vulnerability of distribution channels to illegal counterfeiting and the presence of counterfeit products in a growing number of markets and over the Internet. Third parties may illegally distribute and sell counterfeit versions of our products, which do not meet our rigorous manufacturing and testing standards. To distributors and patients, counterfeit products may be visually indistinguishable from the authentic version. Counterfeit medicines pose a risk to patient health and safety because of the conditions under which they are manufactured often in unregulated, unlicensed, uninspected and unsanitary sites as well as the lack of regulation of their contents.

The industry’s failure to mitigate the threat of counterfeit medicines could adversely impact our business and reputation by impacting patient confidence in our authentic products, potentially resulting in lost sales, product recalls, and an increased threat of litigation. In addition, diversion of our products from their authorized market into other channels may result in reduced revenues and negatively affect our profitability.

The COVID-19 pandemic has adversely impacted certain aspects of the Company’s business and could cause disruptions or future impact to the Company’s business, results of operations and financial condition.
We are subject to risks associated with global health crises, epidemics and pandemics, including the global outbreak of coronavirus and its variants (COVID-19). The COVID-19 pandemic has adversely impacted, and is expected to continue to adversely impact, certain aspects of the Company’s business, results of operations and financial condition, including lower sales and reduced customer demand and usage of certain of our products. The spread of COVID-19 has caused the Company to modify its business practices (including instituting remote work for many of the Company’s employees), and the Company may take further actions as may be required by government authorities or as the Company determines are in the best interests of our patients, customers, employees and business partners. The Company continues to monitor the situation and while we have robust business continuity plans in place across our global supply chain network to help mitigate the impact of COVID-19, these efforts may not completely prevent our business from being adversely affected and future impacts remain uncertain.

While the U.S. and other countries have begun or will begin to reopen their economies, the extent to which COVID-19 will impact the Company’s future operations will depend on many factors which cannot be predicted with confidence, including the duration of the outbreak and impact of variants. Any resurgence in COVID-19 could result in the imposition of new mandates and prolonged restrictive measures implemented in order to control the spread of the disease. The continued global spread of COVID-19 could adversely impact the Company’s operations, including, among other things, our manufacturing operations, supply chain, including third-party suppliers, sales and marketing and clinical trial operations. Any of these factors could adversely affect the Company’s business, financial results, and global economic conditions generally.

We also face uncertainties related to our COVID-19 vaccine, including uncertainties related to the risk that our continued development programs may not be successful, commercially viable or receive approval from regulatory authorities; risks associated with clinical trial and real-world data, including further analyses of its efficacy, safety and durability; the risk that data are subject to differing interpretations and assessments, including during the peer review/publication process, in the scientific community generally, and by national immunization technical advisory groups (NITAGs) and regulatory authorities; disruptions in the relationships between us, our third-party suppliers and external manufacturers; the risk that other companies may produce superior or competitive products; the risk that demand for any products we may develop may no longer exist; risks related to the availability of raw materials to manufacture any such products; the risk that we may not be able to recoup costs associated with our R&D and manufacturing efforts and risks associated with any changes in the way we approach or provide additional research funding for potential drug development related to COVID-19; the risk that we may not be able to create or scale up manufacturing capacity on a timely basis, that we may continue to experience manufacturing delays once a manufacturing site is activated, or have access to logistics or supply channels commensurate with global demand for any potential approved vaccine or product candidate, which would negatively impact our ability to supply the estimated numbers of doses of our vaccine within the projected time periods indicated, and other challenges and risks associated with the pace of our vaccine development program; and pricing and access challenges for such products, including in the U.S.

In addition, to the extent the COVID-19 pandemic adversely affects our business and financial results, it may also have the effect of heightening many of the other risks described in this “Risk Factors” section and those incorporated by reference herein, including risks relating to the Company’s effective tax rate as a result of changes in consumption as well as changes in laws relating to supply of the Company’s products. Given that developments concerning the COVID-19 pandemic have been constantly evolving, additional impacts and risks may arise, including litigation, that are not presently known to the Company.
9



Risks Related to Government Regulation and Legal Proceedings

Global sales in the Company’s Pharmaceutical and Medical Devices segments may be negatively impacted by healthcare reforms and increasing pricing pressures.
Sales of the Company’s Pharmaceutical and Medical Devices products are significantly affected by reimbursements by third-party payers such as government healthcare programs, private insurance plans and managed care organizations. As part of various efforts to contain healthcare costs, these payers are putting downward pressure on prices at which products will be reimbursed. In the U.S., increased purchasing power of entities that negotiate on behalf of Medicare, Medicaid, and private sector beneficiaries, in part due to continued consolidation among healthcare providers, could result in further pricing pressures. In addition, increased political scrutiny could result in additional pricing pressures. Outside the U.S., numerous major markets, including the EU, United Kingdom, Japan and China, have pervasive government involvement in funding healthcare and, in that regard, directly or indirectly impose price controls, limit access to, or reimbursement for, the Company’s products, or reduce the value of its intellectual property protection.

The Company is subject to significant legal proceedings that can result in significant expenses, fines and reputational damage.
In the ordinary course of business, Johnson & Johnson and its subsidiaries are subject to numerous claims and lawsuits involving various issues such as product liability, patent disputes and claims that their product sales, marketing and pricing practices violate various antitrust, unfair trade practices and/or consumer protection laws. The Company’s more significant legal proceedings are described in Note 19, “Legal Proceedings” under Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements included in Item 8 of this Report. Litigation, in general, and securities, derivative action, class action and multi-district litigation, in particular, can be expensive and disruptive. Some of these matters may include thousands of plaintiffs, may involve parties seeking large and/or indeterminate amounts, including punitive or exemplary damages, and may remain unresolved for several years. For example, the Company is a defendant in numerous lawsuits arising out of the use of body powders containing talc, primarily JOHNSON’S® Baby Powder, and the Company’s sale, manufacturing and marketing of opioids.While the Company believes it has substantial defenses in these matters, it is not feasible to predict the ultimate outcome of litigation. The Company could in the future be required to pay significant amounts as a result of settlements or judgments in these matters, potentially in excess of accruals, including matters where the Company could be held jointly and severally liable among other defendants. The resolution of, or increase in accruals for, one or more of these matters in any reporting period could have a material adverse effect on the Company’s results of operations and cash flows for that period. The Company does not purchase third-party product liability insurance; however, the Company utilizes a wholly owned captive insurance company subject to certain limits.

Product reliability, safety and effectiveness concerns can have significant negative impacts on sales and results of operations, lead to litigation and cause reputational damage.
Concerns about product safety, whether raised internally or by litigants, regulators or consumer advocates, and whether or not based on scientific evidence, can result in safety alerts, product recalls, governmental investigations, regulatory action on the part of the U.S. Food and Drug Administration(or its counterpart in other countries), private claims and lawsuits, payment of fines and settlements, declining sales and reputational damage. These circumstances can also result in damage to brand image, brand equity and consumer trust in the Company’s products. Product recalls have in the past, and could in the future, prompt government investigations and inspections, the shutdown of manufacturing facilities, continued product shortages and related sales declines, significant remediation costs, reputational damage, possible civil penalties and criminal prosecution.

The Company faces significant regulatory scrutiny, which imposes significant compliance costs and exposes the Company to government investigations, legal actions and penalties.
Like other companies in the healthcare industry, the Company is subject to extensive regulation, investigations and legal action by national, state and local government agencies in the U.S. and other countries in which it operates. Regulatory issues regarding compliance with current Good Manufacturing Practices (cGMP) (and comparable quality regulations in foreign countries) by manufacturers of drugs, devices and consumer products can lead to fines and penalties, product recalls, product shortages, interruptions in production, delays in new product approvals and litigation. In addition, the marketing, pricing and sale of the Company’s products are subject to regulation, investigations and legal actions including under the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act, the Medicaid Rebate Program, federal and state false claims acts, state unfair trade practices acts and consumer protection laws. Scrutiny of healthcare industry business practices by government agencies and state attorneys general in the U.S., and any resulting investigations and prosecutions, carry risk of significant civil and criminal penalties including, but not limited to, debarment from participation in government healthcare programs. Any such debarment could have a material adverse effect on the Company’s business and results of operations. The most significant current investigations and litigation brought by government agencies are described in Note 19, “Legal Proceedings—Government Proceedings” under Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements included in Item 8 of this Report.

10


Changes in tax laws or exposures to additional tax liabilities could negatively impact the Company’s operating results.
Changes in tax laws or regulations around the world, including in the U.S. and as led by the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development, could negatively impact the Company’s effective tax rate and results of operations. A change in statutory tax rate or certain international tax provisions in any country would result in the revaluation of the Company’s deferred tax assets and liabilities related to that particular jurisdiction in the period in which the new tax law is enacted. This change would result in an expense or benefit recorded to the Company’s Consolidated Statement of Earnings. The Company closely monitors these proposals as they arise in the countries where it operates. Changes to tax laws or regulationsmay occur at any time, and any related expense or benefit recorded may be material to the fiscal quarter and year in which the law change is enacted.

See Note 8, “Income Taxes” under Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements included in Item 8 of this Report for additional information.

The Company conducts business and files tax returns in numerous countries and is addressing tax audits and disputes with many tax authorities. In connection with various government initiatives, companies are required to disclose more information to tax authorities on operations around the world, which may lead to greater audit scrutiny of profits earned in other countries. The Company regularly assesses the likely outcomes of its tax audits and disputes to determine the appropriateness of its tax reserves. However, any tax authority could take a position on tax treatment that is contrary to the Company’s expectations, which could result in tax liabilities in excess of reserves.

Risks Related to Our Intellectual Property

The Company faces increased challenges to intellectual property rights central to its business.
The Company owns or licenses a significant number of patents and other proprietary rights relating to its products and manufacturing processes. These rights are essential to the Company’s businesses and materially important to the Company’s results of operations. Public policy, both within and outside the U.S., has become increasingly unfavorable toward intellectual property rights. The Company cannot be certain that it will obtain adequate patent protection for new products and technologies in the United States and other important markets or that such protections, once granted, will last as long as originally anticipated.

Competitors routinely challenge the validity or extent of the Company’s owned or licensed patents and proprietary rights through litigation, interferences, oppositions and other proceedings, such as inter partes review (IPR) proceedings before the United States Patent & Trademark Office (USPTO). These proceedings absorb resources and can be protracted as well as unpredictable. In addition, challenges that the Company’s products infringe the patents of third parties could result in an injunction and/or the need to pay past damages and future royalties and adversely affect the competitive position and sales of the products in question.

The Company has faced increasing patent challenges from third parties seeking to manufacture and market generic and biosimilar versions of the Company’s key pharmaceutical products prior to expiration of the applicable patents covering those products. In the U.S., manufacturers of generic versions of innovative human pharmaceutical products may challenge the validity, or claim non-infringement, of innovator products through the Abbreviated New Drug Application, or ANDA, process with the U.S. FDA and related ANDA litigation. The Biologics Price Competition and Innovation Act (BPCIA), enacted in 2010, which created a new regulatory pathway for the approval by the U.S. FDA of biosimilar alternatives to innovator-developed biological products, also created mechanisms for biosimilar applicants to challenge the patents on the innovator biologics. The IPR process with the USPTO is also being used by competitors to challenge patents asserted in litigation.

In the event the Company is not successful in defending its patents against such challenges, or upon the “at-risk” launch by the generic or biosimilar firm of its product, the Company can lose a major portion of revenues for the referenced product in a very short period of time. Current legal proceedings involving the Company’s patents and other intellectual property rights are described in Note 19, “Legal Proceedings—Intellectual Property” under Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements included in Item 8 of this Report.

Risks Related to Product Development, Regulatory Approval and Commercialization

Significant challenges or delays in the Company’s innovation and development of new products, technologies and indications could have an adverse impact on the Company’s long-term success.
The Company’s continued growth and success depends on its ability to innovate and develop new and differentiated products and services that address the evolving health carehealthcare needs of patients, providers and consumers. Development of successful
11


products and technologies is also necessary to offset revenue losses when the Company’s existing products lose market share due to various factors such as competition and loss of patent exclusivity. New products introduced within the past five years accounted for approximately 25% of 20192021 sales. The Company cannot be certain when or whether it will be able to develop, license or otherwise acquire companies, products and technologies, whether particular product candidates will be granted regulatory approval, and, if approved, whether the products will be commercially successful.

The Company pursues product development through internal research and development as well as through collaborations, acquisitions, joint ventures and licensing or other arrangements with third parties. In all of these contexts, developing new products, particularly pharmaceutical and biotechnology products and medical devices, requires significant investment of resources over many years. Only a very few biopharmaceutical research and development programs result in commercially viable products. The process depends on many factors including the ability toto: discern patients’ and health carehealthcare providers’ future needs; develop promising new compounds, strategies and technologies; achieve successful clinical trial results; secure effective intellectual property protection; obtain regulatory approvals on a timely basis; and, if and when they reach the market, successfully differentiate the Company’s products from competing products and approaches to treatment. New products or enhancements to existing products may not be accepted quickly or significantly in the marketplace due to product and price competition, changes in customer preferences or healthcare purchasing patterns, resistance by healthcare providers or uncertainty over third-party reimbursement. Even following initial regulatory approval, the success of a product can be adversely impacted by safety and efficacy findings in larger real worldreal-world patient populations, as well as market entry of competitive products.
The Company faces increasing regulatory scrutiny which imposes significant compliance costs
Risks Related to Financial and exposes the Company to government investigations, legal actions and penalties.Economic Market Conditions
Like other companies in the healthcare industry, the Company is subject to extensive regulation, investigations and legal action, by national, state and local government agencies in the U.S. and other countries in which they operate. Regulatory issues regarding compliance with Good Manufacturing Practices (cGMP) (and comparable quality regulations in foreign countries) by manufacturers of drugs, devices and consumer products can lead to fines and penalties, product recalls, product shortages, interruptions in production, delays in new product approvals and litigation. In addition, the marketing, pricing and sale of the Company’s products are subject to regulation, investigations and legal actions including under the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act, the Medicaid Rebate Program, federal and state false claims acts, state unfair trade practices acts and consumer protection laws. Increased scrutiny of health care industry business practices in recent years by government agencies and state attorneys general in the U.S., and any resulting investigations and prosecutions, carry risk of significant civil and criminal penalties including, but not limited to, debarment from participation in government healthcare programs. Any such debarment could have a material adverse effect on the Company’s business and results of operations. The most significant current investigations and litigation brought by government agencies are described in Note 21, “Legal Proceedings-Government Proceedings” under Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements included in Item 8 of this Report.
The Company faces a variety of financial, economic, legal, social and political risks associated with conducting business internationally.internationally.
The Company’s extensive operations and business activity outsidethroughout the U.S.world are accompanied by certain financial, economic, legal, social and political risks, including those listed below.

Foreign Currency Exchange: In fiscal 2019,2021, approximately 49%50% of the Company’s sales occurred outside of the U.S., with approximately 23%25% in Europe, 7%6% in the Western Hemisphere, excluding the U.S., and 19%in the Asia-Pacific and Africa region. Changes in non-U.S. currencies relative to the U.S. dollar impact the Company’s revenues and expenses. While the Company uses financial instruments to mitigate the impact of fluctuations in currency exchange rates on its cash flows,

8


unhedged exposures continue to be subject to currency fluctuations. In addition, the weakening or strengthening of the U.S. dollar may result in significant favorable or unfavorable translation effects when the operating results of the Company’s non-U.S. business activity are translated into U.S. dollars.

Inflation and Currency Devaluation Risks: The Company faces challenges in maintaining profitability of operations in economies experiencing high inflation rates. The Company has accounted for operations in Argentina (beginning in the fiscal third quarter of 2018) and Venezuela as highly inflationary, as the prior three-year cumulative inflation rate surpassed 100%. While the Company strives to maintain profit margins in these areas through cost reduction programs, productivity improvements and periodic price increases, it might experience operating losses as a result of continued inflation. In addition, the impact of currency devaluations in countries experiencing high inflation rates or significant currency exchange fluctuations could negatively impact the Company’s operating results.

Illegal Importation of Pharmaceutical Products: The illegal importation of pharmaceutical products from countries where government price controls or other market dynamics result in lower prices may adversely affect the Company’s sales and profitability in the U.S. and other countries in which the Company operates. With the exception of limited quantities of prescription drugs for personal use, foreign imports of pharmaceutical products are illegal under current U.S. law. However, the volume of illegal imports continues to rise as the ability of patients and other customers to obtain the lower-priced imports has grown significantly.

Anti-Bribery and Other Regulations: The Company is subject to various federal and foreign laws that govern its international business practices with respect to payments to government officials. Those laws include the U.S. Foreign Corrupt Practices Act (FCPA), which prohibits U.S. publicly traded companies from promising, offering, or giving anything of value to foreign officials with the corrupt intent of influencing the foreign official for the purpose of helping the Company obtain or retain business or gain any improper advantage. The Company’s business is heavily regulated and therefore involves significant interaction with foreign officials. Also, in many countries outside the U.S., the health carehealthcare providers who prescribe human pharmaceuticals are employed by the government and the purchasers of human pharmaceuticals are government entities;
12


therefore, the Company’s interactions with these prescribers and purchasers are subject to regulation under the FCPA. In addition to the U.S. application and enforcement of the FCPA, various jurisdictions in which the Company operates have laws and regulations, including the U.KU.K. Bribery Act 2010, aimed at preventing and penalizing corrupt and anticompetitive behavior. Enforcement activities under these laws could subject the Company to additional administrative and legal proceedings and actions, which could include claims for civil penalties, criminal sanctions, and administrative remedies, including exclusion from health carehealthcare programs.

Other Financial, Economic, Legal, Social and Political Risks. Other risks inherent in conducting business globally include:
local and regional economic environments and policies in the markets that we serve, including interest rates, monetary policy, inflation, economic growth, recession, commodity prices, and currency controls or other limitations on the ability to expatriate cash;
protective economic policies taken by governments, such as trade protection measures and import/export licensing requirements;
compliance with local regulations and laws including, in some countries, regulatory requirements restricting the Company’s ability to manufacture or sell its products in the relevant market;
diminished protection of intellectual property and contractual rights in certain jurisdictions;
potential nationalization or expropriation of the Company’s foreign assets;
political or social upheavals, economic instability, repression, or human rights issues; and
geopolitical events, including natural disasters, disruptions to markets due to war, armed conflict, terrorism, social upheavalsepidemics or pandemics.
Interruptions and delays in manufacturing operations
Failure to maintain a satisfactory credit rating could adversely affect the Company’s business, salesour liquidity, capital position, borrowing costs and reputation.access to capital markets.
The Company’s manufacture of products requires the timely delivery of sufficient amounts of complex, high-quality componentsWe currently maintain investment grade credit ratings with Moody’s Investors Service and materials. The Company's subsidiaries operate 97 manufacturing facilities as well as sourcing from hundreds of suppliers around the world. The Company has in the past,Standard & Poor’s Ratings Services. Rating agencies routinely evaluate us, and may in the future, face unanticipated interruptions and delays in manufacturing through its internal or external supply chain. Manufacturing disruptions can occur for many reasons including regulatory action, production quality deviations or safety issues, labor disputes, site-specific incidents (such as fires), natural disasters such as hurricanes and other severe weather events, raw material shortages, political unrest and terrorist attacks. Such delays and difficulties in manufacturing can result in product shortages, declines in sales and reputational impact as well as significant remediation and related costs associated with addressing the shortage.
The Company relies on third parties to manufacture certaintheir ratings of our products.long-term and short-term debt are based on a number of factors. Any failure by or loss of a third party manufacturer could result in delays and increased costs, which may adversely affect our business.

The Company relies on third parties to manufacture certaindowngrade of our products. We depend on these third party manufacturers to allocate to uscredit ratings by a portioncredit rating agency, whether as a result of their manufacturingour actions or factors which are beyond our control, can increase the cost of borrowing under any indebtedness we may incur, reduce market capacity sufficient to meetfor our needs, to produce productscommercial paper or require the posting of acceptable quality

9


and at acceptable manufacturing yields and to deliver those products to us on a timely basis and at acceptable prices. However,additional collateral under our derivative contracts. There can be no assurance that we cannot guarantee that these third party manufacturers will be able to meetmaintain our near-termcredit ratings, and any additional actual or long-term manufacturing requirements, which could resultanticipated changes or downgrades in lost sales and have an adverse effect on our business.

Other risks associated withcredit ratings, including any announcement that our reliance on third parties to manufacture these products include, reliance on the third partyratings are under review for regulatory compliance and quality assurance, misappropriation of the Company’s intellectual property, limited ability to manage our inventory, possible breach of the manufacturing agreement by the third party and the possible termination or nonrenewal of the manufacturing agreement by the third party at a time that is costly or inconvenient for us. Moreover, if any of our third party manufacturers suffer any damage to facilities, lose benefits under material agreements, experience power outages, encounter financial difficulties, are unable to secure necessary raw materials from their suppliers or suffer any other reduction in efficiency, the Companydowngrade, may experience significant business disruption. In the event of any such disruption, the Company would need to seek and source other qualified third party manufacturers, likely resulting in further delays and increased costs which could affect our business adversely.

Counterfeit versions of our products could harm our patients and have a negative impact on our revenues, earnings, reputationliquidity, capital position and business.access to capital markets.
Our industry continues
Risks Related to the Planned Separation of our Consumer Health Business

The planned separation of the Company’s Consumer Health business may not be challenged bycompleted on the vulnerabilityterms or timeline currently contemplated, if at all, and may not achieve the expected results.
In November 2021, the Company announced its intention to separate the Company’s Consumer Health business, with the intention to create a new, publicly traded company. The planned separation is intended to qualify as a tax-free transaction for U.S. federal income tax purposes. The Company is targeting completion of distribution channelsthe planned separation in 18 to illegal counterfeiting24 months after initial announcement. Completion of the planned separation will be subject to the satisfaction of certain conditions, including, among others, consultations with works councils and other employee representative bodies, as required, final approval of the Company’s Board of Directors, receipt of a favorable opinion and Internal Revenue Service (“IRS”) ruling with respect to the tax-free nature of the transaction, and the presencereceipt of counterfeit productsother regulatory approvals. There can be no assurance regarding the ultimate timing of the planned separation or that such separation will be completed. Unanticipated developments could delay, prevent or otherwise adversely affect the planned separation, including but not limited to disruptions in general or financial market conditions or potential problems or delays in obtaining various regulatory and tax approvals or clearances.

The costs to complete the planned separation will be significant. In addition, the Company may be unable to achieve some or all of the strategic and financial benefits that it expects to achieve from the planned separation of the Company’s Consumer Health business.
The Company will incur significant expenses in connection with the planned separation. In addition, the Company may not be able to achieve the full strategic and financial benefits that are expected to result from the planned separation. The anticipated benefits of the planned separation are based on a growing number of marketsassumptions, some of which may prove incorrect.



13


Following the planned separation, the price of shares of the Company’s common stock may fluctuate significantly.
The Company cannot predict the effect of the planned separation on the trading price of shares of its common stock, and the market value of shares of its common stock may be less than, equal to or greater than the market value of shares of its common stock prior to the planned separation. In addition, the price of the Company’s common stock may be more volatile around the time of the planned separation.

The planned separation could result in substantial tax liability.
The Company intends to obtain an opinion from its U.S. tax advisors and a ruling from the IRS as to the tax-free nature of the planned separation under the U.S. Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended. The opinion and ruling will be based on, among other things, various factual assumptions and representations that the Company and the New Consumer Health Company will make regarding the past and future conduct of the companies’ respective businesses and other matters. If any of these assumptions or representations are, or become, inaccurate or incomplete, reliance on the opinion and ruling may be jeopardized. If subsequent to the planned separation it is determined that the transaction does not qualify for tax-free treatment for U.S. federal income tax purposes, the resulting tax liability to the Company and its shareholders could be substantial.The planned separation may also not qualify for tax-free treatment in other countries around the world, and as a result may trigger substantial tax liability to the Company.

Other Risks

Our business depends on our ability to recruit and retain talented, highly skilled employees and a diverse workforce.
Our continued growth requires us to recruit and retain talented employees representing diverse backgrounds, experiences, and skill sets. The market for highly skilled workers and leaders in our industry is extremely competitive and our ability to compete depends on our ability to hire, develop and motivate highly skilled personnel in all areas of our organization. Maintaining our brand and reputation, as well as a diverse, equitable and inclusive work environment enables us to attract top talent. If we are less successful in our recruiting efforts, or if we cannot retain highly skilled workers and key leaders, our ability to develop and deliver successful products and services may be adversely affected. In addition, effective succession planning is important to our long-term success. Any unsuccessful implementation of our succession plans or failure to ensure effective transfer of knowledge and smooth transitions involving key employees couldadversely affect our business, financial condition, or results of operations.

Climate change or legal, regulatory or market measures to address climate change may negatively affect our business and results of operations.
Climate change resulting from increased concentrations of carbon dioxide and other greenhouse gases in the atmosphere could present risks to our operations, including an adverse impact on global temperatures, weather patterns and the frequency and severity of extreme weather and natural disasters. Natural disasters and extreme weather conditions, such as a hurricane, tornado, earthquake, wildfire or flooding, may pose physical risks to our facilities and disrupt the operation of our supply chain. The impacts of the changing climate on water resources may result in water scarcity, limiting our ability to access sufficient high-quality water in certain locations, which may increase operational costs.

Concern over climate change may also result in new or additional legal or regulatory requirements designed to reduce greenhouse gas emissions and/or mitigate the Internet. Third partieseffects of climate change on the environment. If such laws or regulations are more stringent than current legal or regulatory obligations, we may illegally distributeexperience disruption in, or an increase in the costs associated with sourcing, manufacturing and sell counterfeit versionsdistribution of our products, which do not meetmay adversely affect our rigorous manufacturingbusiness, results of operations or financial condition. Further, the impacts of climate change have an influence on customer preferences, and testing standards. To distributors and patients, counterfeit products may be visually indistinguishable from the authentic version. Counterfeit medicines pose a risk to patient health and safety because of the conditions under which they are manufactured-often in unregulated, unlicensed, uninspected and unsanitary sites-as well as the lack of regulation of their contents.
The industry's failure to mitigate the threat of counterfeit medicinesprovide climate-friendly products could adversely impact our business and reputation by impacting patient confidence in our authentic products, potentially resulting in lost sales, product recalls, and an increased threat of litigation. In addition, diversion of our products from their authorized market into other channels may result in reduced revenues and negatively affect our profitability.loss of market share.

An information security incident, including a cybersecurity breach, could have a negative impact to the Company’s business or reputationreputation.
To meet business objectives, the Company relies on both internal information technology (IT) systems and networks, and those of third parties and their vendors, to process and store sensitive data, including confidential research, business plans, financial information, intellectual property, and personal data that may be subject to legal protection.protection, and ensure the continuity of the Company’s supply chain. The extensive information security and cybersecurity threats, which affect companies globally, pose a risk to the security and availability of these IT systems and networks, and the confidentiality, integrity, and availability of the Company’s sensitive data. The Company continually assesses these threats and makes investments to increase internal protection, detection, and response capabilities, as well as ensure the Company’s third partythird-party providers have required capabilities and controls, to address this risk. To date, the Company has not experienced any material impact to the business or operations resulting from information or cybersecurity attacks; however, because of the frequently changing attack techniques, along with the increased volume and sophistication of the attacks, there is the potential for the Company to be adversely
14


impacted. This impact could result in reputational, competitive, operational or other business harm as well as financial costs and regulatory action. The Company maintains cybersecurity insurance in the event of an information security or cyber incident,incident; however, the coverage may not be sufficient to cover all financial, legal, business or reputational losses.


A breach of privacy laws or unauthorized access, loss or misuse of personal data could have a negative impact to the Company’s business or reputation.

The Company is subject to privacy and data protection laws across the globe that impose broad compliance obligations on the collection, use, storage, access, transfer and protection of personal data. Breach of such requirements could result in substantial fines, penalties, private right of actions, claims and damage to our reputation and business. New privacy laws are expected in other territories, together with greater privacy enforcement by governmental authorities globally, particularly on data localization requirements and international data flows. The Company has established privacy compliance programs and controls that our businesses worldwide are required to comply with, but with many technology and data-driven initiatives being prioritized across the Company and involving multiple vendors and third parties, there are potential risks of controls imposed on cross border data flows, unauthorized access, and loss of personal data through internal and external threats that could impact our business operations and research activities.







Item 1B.UNRESOLVED STAFF COMMENTS
    Not applicable.

1015



Item 1B.UNRESOLVED STAFF COMMENTS
Not applicable.

Item 2.PROPERTIES
The Company's subsidiaries operate 9785 manufacturing facilities occupying approximately 15.215.0 million square feet of floor space. The manufacturing facilities are used by the industry segments of the Company’s business approximately as follows:
Segment
Square Feet

(in thousands)
Consumer Health4,8324,562 
Pharmaceutical5,4965,517 
Medical Devices4,8254,908 
Worldwide Total15,15314,987 
Within the U.S., fivefour facilities are used by the Consumer Health segment, five by the Pharmaceutical segment and 2217 by the Medical Devices segment. Outside of the U.S., 2523 facilities are used by the Consumer Health segment, 1413 by the Pharmaceutical segment and 2623 by the Medical Devices segment.
The locations of the manufacturing facilities by major geographic areas of the world are as follows:
Geographic AreaNumber of FacilitiesSquare Feet
(in thousands)
United States26 4,233 
Europe25 5,991 
Western Hemisphere, excluding U.S. 1,733 
Africa, Asia and Pacific25 3,030 
Worldwide Total85 14,987 
Geographic Area Number of Facilities 
Square Feet
(in thousands)
United States 32
 4,480
Europe 27
 5,939
Western Hemisphere, excluding U.S.  11
 1,833
Africa, Asia and Pacific 27
 2,901
Worldwide Total 97
 15,153
In addition to the manufacturing facilities discussed above, the Company maintains numerous office and warehouse facilities throughout the world. Research facilities are also discussed in Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Results of Operations and Financial Condition of this Report.
The Company's subsidiaries generally seek to own, rather than lease, their manufacturing facilities, although some, principally in non-U.S. locations, are leased. Office and warehouse facilities are often leased. The Company also engages contract manufacturers.
The Company is committed to maintaining all of its properties in good operating condition.
McNEIL-PPC, Inc. (now Johnson & Johnson Consumer Inc.) (McNEIL-PPC) continues to operateoperated under a consent decree, signed in 2011 with the U.S. FDA, which governsgoverned certain McNeil Consumer Healthcare manufacturing operations, and requiresrequired McNEIL-PPC to remediate the facilities it operates in Lancaster, Pennsylvania, Fort Washington, Pennsylvania, and Las Piedras, Puerto Rico (the "Consent Decree"“Consent Decree”). Following U.S. FDA inspections McNEIL-PPC received notifications from the U.S FDA that all three manufacturing facilities arewere in conformity with applicable laws and regulations, and commercial production has restarted in 2015.
Under the Consent Decree, after receiving notice from the U.S. FDA of being in compliance with applicable laws and regulations, each of the three facilities iswas subject to a five-year audit period by a third-party cGMP expert. Thus, aA third-party expert will continuecontinued to reassess the sites at various times until at leastthrough 2020.
For information regarding lease obligations, see Note 16 “Lease Commitments” U.S. FDA inspections of the Notesfacilities which have been delayed due to Consolidated Financial Statements includedCOVID-19 were completed and the Consent Decree was vacated in Item 8July of this Report.2021.
    Segment information on additions to property, plant and equipment is contained in Note 1817 “Segments of Business and Geographic Areas” of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements included in Item 8 of this Report.

1116





Item 3.LEGAL PROCEEDINGS

Item 3.LEGAL PROCEEDINGS
The information called for by this item is incorporated herein by reference to the information set forth in Note 2119 “Legal Proceedings” of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements included in Item 8 of this Report.
In addition, Johnson & Johnson and its subsidiaries are also parties to a number of proceedings brought under the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act, commonly known as Superfund, and comparable state, local or foreign laws in which the primary relief sought is the cost of past and/or future remediation.

Item 4.MINE SAFETY DISCLOSURES
Item 4.MINE SAFETY DISCLOSURES
Not applicable.
EXECUTIVE OFFICERS OF THE REGISTRANT
Listed below are the executive officers of the Company. There are no family relationships between any of the executive officers, and there is no arrangement or understanding between any executive officer and any other person pursuant to which the executive officer was selected. At the annual meeting of the Board of Directors, the executive officers are elected by the Board to hold office for one year and until their respective successors are elected and qualified, or until earlier resignation or removal.
Information with regard to the directors of the Company including information for Alex Gorsky, who is also an executive officer, is incorporated herein by reference to the material captioned “Item 1. Election of Directors” in the Proxy Statement.
NameAgePosition
Joaquin DuatoVanessa Broadhurst5753
Member, Executive Committee; Executive Vice President, Global Corporate Affairs(a)
Joaquin Duato59
Chief Executive Officer; Chairman, Executive Committee(a)(b)
Peter M. Fasolo, Ph.D.5759
Member, Executive Committee; Executive Vice President, Chief Human Resources Officer(b)(c)
Alex GorskyWilliam N. Hait, M.D., Ph. D.5972Chairman, Board of Directors; Chairman,
Member, Executive Committee; Executive Vice President, Chief ExecutiveExternal Innovation, Medical Safety and Global Public Health Officer(d)
Mathai Mammen, Ph. D.54
Member, Executive Committee; Executive Vice President, Pharmaceuticals, R&D(e)
Ashley McEvoy4951
Member, Executive Committee; Executive Vice President, Worldwide Chairman, Medical Devices(c)(f)
Thibaut Mongon5052
Member, Executive Committee, Executive Vice President, Worldwide Chairman, Consumer Health(d)(g)
Michael E. SneedJames Swanson6056
Member, Executive Committee; Executive Vice President, Global Corporate Affairs and Chief CommunicationInformation Officer(e)(h)
Paulus Stoffels, M.D.57
Vice Chairman, Executive Committee; Chief Scientific Officer(f)
Jennifer L. Taubert5658
Member, Executive Committee; Executive Vice President, Worldwide Chairman, Pharmaceuticals(g)(i)
Michael H. Ullmann6163
Member, Executive Committee; Executive Vice President, General Counsel(h)(j)
Kathryn E. Wengel5456
Member, Executive Committee; Executive Vice President, Chief Global Supply Chain Officer(i)(k)
Joseph J. Wolk5355
Member, Executive Committee; Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer(j)(l)
(a)Ms. V. Broadhurst joined the Company in 2005 as Worldwide Vice President, Anemia & Oncology Supportive Care. She then went on to become Vice President of the Cardiovascular & Institutional Franchise in 2008, and President of Janssen Therapeutics in 2011 before becoming U.S. President, Internal Medicine in 2012. From 2013 to 2017, she held General Manager roles at Amgen in Inflammation & Cardiovascular, and Cardiovascular & Bone. In 2017, Ms. Broadhurst rejoined Johnson & Johnson as U.S. President, Cardiovascular & Metabolism and a member of the Janssen Americas Leadership Team. In this role she also provided operational oversight of the full portfolio of Janssen medicines in Puerto Rico and Canada. In 2018, she was appointed Company Group Chairman, Global Commercial Strategy Organization. In 2022, Ms. Broadhurst was named Executive Vice President, Global Corporate Affairs and a
(a)Mr. J. Duato joined the Company in 1989 with Janssen-Farmaceutica S.A. (Spain), a subsidiary of the Company, and held executive positions of increasing responsibility in the Pharmaceutical sector. In 2009, he was named Company Group Chairman, Pharmaceuticals, and in 2011, he was named Worldwide Chairman, Pharmaceuticals. In 2016, Mr. Duato became a member of the Executive Committee and was named Executive Vice President, Worldwide Chairman, Pharmaceuticals. In July 2018, Mr. Duato was promoted to Vice Chairman of the Executive Committee, with responsibility for the company's Pharmaceutical and Consumer sectors, supply chain, information technology, global services and the Health & Wellness groups.

1217


member of the Executive Committee, leading the Company's global marketing, communication, design and philanthropy functions.
(b)Mr. J. Duato became Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the Executive Committee and joined the Board of Directors in January 2022. He joined the Company in 1989 with Janssen-Farmaceutica S.A. (Spain), a subsidiary of the Company, and held executive positions of increasing responsibility in all business sectors and across multiple geographies and functions. In 2009, he was named Company Group Chairman, Pharmaceuticals, and in 2011, he was named Worldwide Chairman, Pharmaceuticals. In 2016, Mr. Duato became a member of the Executive Committee and was named Executive Vice President, Worldwide Chairman, Pharmaceuticals. In July 2018, Mr. Duato was promoted to Vice Chairman of the Executive Committee, where he provided strategic direction for the Pharmaceutical and Consumer Health sectors and oversaw both the Global Supply Chain, Information Technology and Health & Wellness teams. As a dual citizen of Spain and the United States, Mr. Duato's international perspective and global lens gives him a deep appreciation of diverse thoughts and opinions.
(c)Dr. P. M. Fasolo joined the Company in 2004 as Worldwide Vice President, Human Resources in the Medical Devices segment, and subsequently served as the Company’s Chief Talent Officer. He left Johnson & Johnson in 2007 to join Kohlberg Kravis Roberts & Co. as Chief Talent Officer. Dr. Fasolo returned to the Company in 2010 as the Vice President, Global Human Resources, and in 2011, he became a member of the Executive Committee. In April 2016, he was named Executive Vice President, Chief Human Resources Officer. Dr. Fasolo has responsibility for global talent, recruiting, diversity, compensation benefits, employee relations and all aspects of the human resources agenda for the Company. He also serves on the Boards of the Human Resources Policy Association, Tufts University and Save the Children and was named a Fellow of the National Academy of Human Resources in 2017.
(d)Dr. W. Hait joined the Company in 2007 as Senior Vice President, Worldwide Head of Oncology Research. He then served as the first Global Therapeutic Area Head for Oncology from 2009 to 2011, and then as Global Head, Janssen Research & Development from 2011 through 2018. From 2018 to 2022, he was Global Head, Johnson & Johnson Global External Innovation. In 2022, he became Executive Vice President, Chief External Innovation, Medical Safety and Global Public Health Officer, and a member of the Executive Committee. He is responsible for leading external sourcing and creation of transformational innovation to help Johnson & Johnson achieve its mission to improve human health utilizing the Company’s excellence in pharmaceuticals, medical devices and consumer products. He also has oversight over Global Public Health and the Office of the Chief Medical Officer.
(e)Dr. M. Mammen joined the Company in 2017 as Global Head of R&D at the Janssen Pharmaceutical Companies of Johnson & Johnson. Prior to joining Janssen in June 2017, Dr. Mammen was Senior Vice President at Merck Research Laboratories, responsible for research in the areas of Cardiovascular, Metabolic and Renal Diseases, Oncology/lmmuno-Oncology and Immunology. Prior to Merck, he led R&D at Theravance, a company he co-founded in the San Francisco Bay Area in 1997 based on his work at Harvard University. In 2022, he was named as Executive Vice President, Pharmaceuticals R&D, and a member of the Executive Committee. He is responsible for a team whose mission is to make transformational medicines with unequivocal benefit for patients worldwide, working across a wide range of therapeutic areas and biological pathways in the areas of: Oncology, Cardiovascular and Metabolic Disease, Retinal Disease, Pulmonary Hypertension, Immunology, Neuroscience and Infectious Disease and Vaccines. These Therapeutic Areas are fueled by world-class Global Functions in Discovery Sciences and Manufacturing, Regulatory Affairs, Development Operations and Data Science.
(f)Ms. A. McEvoy joined the Company in 1996 as Assistant Brand Manager of McNeil Consumer Health, a subsidiary of the Company, advancing through positions of increasing responsibilities until she was appointed Company Group Chairman, Vision Care in 2012, followed by Company Group Chairman, Consumer Medical Devices in 2014. In July 2018, Ms. McEvoy was promoted to Executive Vice President, Worldwide Chairman, Medical Devices, and became a member of the Executive Committee. Ms. McEvoy has responsibility for the surgery, orthopaedics, interventional solutions and eye health businesses across Ethicon, DePuy Synthes, Biosense Webster and Johnson & Johnson Vision.
(g)Mr. T. Mongon joined the Company in 2000 as Director of Marketing for the Vision Care group in France and subsequently held positions of increasing responsibility until he transitioned to the Pharmaceutical sector in 2012, as the Global Commercial Strategy Leader for the Neuroscience therapeutic area. In 2014, he joined the Consumer Health sector as Company Group Chairman Asia-Pacific. In 2019, he was promoted to Executive Vice President and Worldwide Chairman, Consumer Health, and became a member of the Executive Committee. Mr. Mongon has responsibility for the global development of Johnson & Johnson’s health and wellness products and solutions in beauty, OTC, oral care, baby care, women’s health, and wound care.
(h)Mr. J. Swanson rejoined the Company in 2019 as Chief Information Officer of Johnson & Johnson from Bayer Crop Science, where he served as a member of the Executive Leadership Team and as CIO and Head of Digital Transformation. From 1996 to 2005, Mr. Swanson held positions of increasing responsibility at the Company, including Project Manager, Director IT, Sr. Director IT and Vice President, Chief Information Officer. Mr. Swanson is
(b)Dr. P. M. Fasolo joined the Company in 2004 as Vice President, Worldwide Human Resources for Cordis Corporation, a subsidiary of the Company, and was subsequently named Vice President, Global Talent Management for the Company. He left Johnson & Johnson in 2007 to join Kohlberg Kravis Roberts & Co. as Chief Talent Officer. Dr. Fasolo returned to the Company in 2010 as the Vice President, Global Human Resources, and in 2011, he became a member of the Executive Committee. In April 2016, he was named Executive Vice President, Chief Human Resources Officer. Dr. Fasolo has responsibility for global talent, recruiting, diversity, compensation, benefits, employee relations and all aspects of the human resources agenda for the Company.
(c)Ms. A. McEvoy joined the Company in 1996 as Assistant Brand Manager of McNeil Consumer Health, a subsidiary of the Company, advancing through positions of increasing responsibilities until she was appointed Company Group Chairman, Vision Care in 2012, followed by Company Group Chairman, Consumer Medical Devices in 2014. In July 2018, Ms. McEvoy was promoted to Executive Vice President, Worldwide Chairman, Medical Devices, and became a member of the Executive Committee. Ms. McEvoy has responsibility for the surgery, orthopaedics, interventional solutions and eye health businesses across Ethicon, DePuy Synthes, Biosense Webster and Johnson & Johnson Vision.
(d)Mr. T. Mongon joined the Company in 2000 as Director of Marketing for the Vision Care group in France and subsequently held general management positions as Country Manager France, Belgium and North Africa, Managing Director Latin America, and President Asia-Pacific. Mr. Mongon transitioned to the Pharmaceutical sector in 2012 as the Global Commercial Strategy Leader for the Neuroscience therapeutic area, before joining the consumer sector as Company Group Chairman Asia-Pacific. In 2019, he was promoted to Executive Vice President and Worldwide Chairman, Consumer, and became a member of the Executive Committee. Mr. Mongon has responsibility for the global development of Johnson & Johnson’s health and wellness products and solutions in beauty, OTC, oral care, baby care, women’s health, and wound care.
(e)Mr. M. E. Sneed joined the Company in 1983 as Marketing Assistant for Personal Products Company, a subsidiary of the Company, and gained increased responsibilities in executive positions across the global enterprise. In 2004, Mr. Sneed was appointed Company Group Chairman, Consumer North America, followed by Company Group Chairman, Vision Care Franchise in 2007. In 2012, he became the Vice President, Global Corporate Affairs and Chief Communications Officer. Mr. Sneed was appointed Executive Vice President, Global Corporate Affairs and Chief Communications Officer in January 2018, and became a member of the Executive Committee in July 2018, leading the Company's global marketing, communication, design and philanthropy functions.
(f)Dr. P. Stoffels rejoined the Company in 2002 with the acquisition of Tibotec Virco NV, where he was Chief Executive Officer of Virco NV and Chairman of Tibotec NV. In 2005, he was appointed Company Group Chairman, Global Virology. In 2006, he assumed the role of Company Group Chairman, Pharmaceuticals. Dr. Stoffels was appointed Global Head, Research & Development, Pharmaceuticals in 2009, and in 2011, became Worldwide Chairman, Pharmaceuticals. In 2012, Dr. Stoffels was appointed Chief Scientific Officer, and became a member of the Executive Committee. In 2016, Dr. Stoffels was named Executive Vice President, Chief Scientific Officer. In 2018, Dr. Stoffels was promoted to Vice Chairman of the Executive Committee, Chief Scientific Officer. He is responsible for the Company’s innovation agenda across the Pharmaceutical, Medical Devices and Consumer sectors, product safety strategy, and the Company’s global public health strategy.
(g)Ms. J. L. Taubert joined the Company in 2005 as Worldwide Vice President at Johnson & Johnson Pharmaceutical Services, a subsidiary of the Company. She held several executive positions of increasing responsibility in the Pharmaceutical sector until 2012 when she was appointed Company Group Chairman, North America Pharmaceuticals, and in 2015 became Company Group Chairman, The Americas, Pharmaceuticals. In July 2018, Ms. Taubert was promoted to Executive Vice President, Worldwide Chairman, Pharmaceuticals, and became a member of the Executive Committee. Ms. Taubert has responsibility for the Immunology, Infectious Diseases, Neuroscience, Oncology, Cardiovascular and Metabolism, and Pulmonary Hypertension businesses throughout Janssen.
(h)Mr. M. H. Ullmann joined the Company in 1989 as a corporate attorney in the Law Department. He was appointed Corporate Secretary in 1999 and served in that role until 2006.  During that time, he also held various management positions in the Law Department.  In 2006, he was named General Counsel, Medical Devices and Diagnostics and was appointed Vice President, General Counsel and became a member of the Executive Committee in 2012. In April 2016, Mr. Ullmann was named Executive Vice President, General Counsel. Mr. Ullmann has worldwide responsibility for legal, government affairs & policy, global security, aviation and health care compliance & privacy.
(i)Ms. K. E. Wengel joined the Company in 1988 as Project Engineer and Engineering Supervisor at Janssen, a subsidiary of the Company. During her tenure with the Company, she has held a variety of strategic leadership and executive positions across the global enterprise, in roles within operations, quality, engineering, new products, information technology, and other technical and business functions. In 2010, Ms. Wengel became the first Chief Quality Officer of the Company. In 2014, she was promoted to Vice President, Johnson & Johnson Supply Chain. In July 2018, she was promoted to Executive Vice President, Chief Global Supply Chain Officer, and became a member of the Executive Committee.

1318


responsible for enhancing Johnson & Johnson’s business impact and shaping its direction through the strategic use of technology. Mr. Swanson, Executive Vice President, Chief Information Officer, joined the Executive Committee effective January 3, 2022.
(i)Ms. J. L. Taubert joined the Company in 2005 as Worldwide Vice President, and she held several executive positions of increasing responsibility in the Pharmaceutical sector. In 2012, she was appointed Company Group Chairman, North America Pharmaceuticals, and in 2015 became Company Group Chairman, The Americas, Pharmaceuticals. In July 2018, Ms. Taubert was promoted to Executive Vice President, Worldwide Chairman, Pharmaceuticals, and became a member of the Executive Committee. Ms. Taubert is responsible for the Pharmaceutical sector globally, including shaping the company’s strategy of transformational medical innovation and for successfully bringing to market critical new medicines that significantly improve the lives of patients living with cancer, immune-related diseases, cardiovascular disease, infectious diseases, pulmonary hypertension and serious mental illness.
(j)Mr. M. H. Ullmann joined the Company in 1989 as a corporate attorney in the Law Department. He was appointed Corporate Secretary in 1998 and served in that role until 2006.  During that time, he also held various management positions in the Law Department.  In 2006, he was named General Counsel, Medical Devices and Diagnostics and was appointed Vice President, General Counsel and became a member of the Executive Committee in 2012. In April 2016, Mr. Ullmann was named Executive Vice President, General Counsel. Mr. Ullmann has worldwide responsibility for legal, government affairs & policy, global security, aviation, healthcare compliance, global brand protection and privacy.
(k)Ms. K. E. Wengel joined the Company in 1988 as Project Engineer and Engineering Supervisor at Janssen, a subsidiary of the Company. During her tenure with the Company, she has held a variety of strategic leadership and executive positions across the global enterprise, in roles within operations, quality, engineering, new products, information technology, and other technical and business functions. In 2010, Ms. Wengel became the first Chief Quality Officer of the Company. In 2014, she was promoted to Vice President, Johnson & Johnson Supply Chain. In July 2018, she was promoted to Executive Vice President, Chief Global Supply Chain Officer, and became a member of the Executive Committee. Ms. Wengel has enterprise-wide responsibilities for Supply Chain, Quality & Compliance, Procurement, Engineering & Property Services, Environmental Health & Safety and Sustainability.
(l)Mr. J. J. Wolk joined the Company in 1998 as Finance Manager, Business Development for Ortho-McNeil, a subsidiary of the Company, and through the years held a variety of senior leadership roles in several segments and functions across the Company's subsidiaries, in Pharmaceuticals, Medical Devices and Supply Chain. From 2014 to 2016, he served as Vice President, Finance and Chief Financial Officer of the Janssen Pharmaceutical Companies of Johnson & Johnson. In 2016, Mr. Wolk became the Vice President, Investor Relations. In July 2018, he was appointed Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and became a member of the Executive Committee. Mr. Wolk plays a strategic role in the overall management of the Company, and leads the development and execution of the Company's global long-term financial strategy.
(j)Mr. J. J. Wolk joined the Company in 1998 as Finance Manager, Business Development for Ortho-McNeil, a subsidiary of the Company, and through the years held a variety of senior leadership roles in several segments and functions across the Company's subsidiaries, in Pharmaceuticals, Medical Devices and Supply Chain. From 2014 to 2016, he served as Vice President, Finance and Chief Financial Officer of the Janssen Pharmaceutical Companies of Johnson & Johnson. In 2016, Mr. Wolk became the Vice President, Investor Relations. In July 2018, he was appointed Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and became a member of the Executive Committee. Mr. Wolk plays a strategic role in the overall management of the Company, and leads the development and execution of the Company's global long-term financial strategy.

1419



PART II
Item 5.MARKET FOR REGISTRANT’S COMMON EQUITY, RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS AND ISSUER PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES
Item 5.MARKET FOR REGISTRANT’S COMMON EQUITY, RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS AND ISSUER PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES
As of February 12, 2020,10, 2022, there were 135,953127,899 record holders of common stock of the Company. Additional information called for by this item is incorporated herein by reference to the following sections of this Report: Note 1716 “Common Stock, Stock Option Plans and Stock Compensation Agreements” of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements included in Item 8; and Item 12 “Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters – Equity Compensation Plan Information”.Information.”
Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities
On December 17, 2018, the Company announced that its Board of Directors approved a share repurchase program, authorizing the Company to purchase up to $5.0 billion of the Company's Common Stock. Share repurchases take place from time to time on the open market or through privately negotiated transactions. The repurchase program was completed in the fiscal third quarter of 2019.
The following table provides information with respect to common stock purchases by the Company during the fiscal fourth quarter of 2019.2021. Common stock purchases on the open market are made as part of a systematic plan to meet the needs of the Company’s compensation programs. The repurchases below also include the stock-for-stock option exercises that settled in the fiscal fourth quarter.
Fiscal Period
Total Number
of Shares Purchased(1)
Avg. Price
Paid Per Share
Total Number of Shares (or Units) Purchased as Part of Publicly Announced Plans or ProgramsMaximum Number (or Approximate Dollar Value) of Shares (or Units) that May Yet Be Purchased Under the Plans or Programs
October 4, 2021 through October 31, 2021549,068 $163.78 --
November 1, 2021 through November 28, 2021100,000 163.23 --
November 29, 2021 through January 2, 20225,391,956 165.09 --
Total6,041,024 
(1)     During the fiscal fourth quarter of 2021, the Company repurchased an aggregate of 6,041,024 shares of Johnson & Johnson Common Stock in open-market transactions, all of which were purchased in open-market transactions as part of a systematic plan to meet the needs of the Company’s compensation programs.


Item 6. Reserved
Fiscal Period 
Total Number
of Shares Purchased(1)
 
Avg. Price
Paid Per Share
 
Total Number of Shares (or Units) Purchased as Part of Publicly Announced Plans or Programs(2)
 Maximum Number (or Approximate Dollar Value) of Shares (or Units) that May Yet Be Purchased Under the Plans or Programs
September 30, 2019 through October 27, 2019 
 $
 - -
October 28, 2019 through November 24, 2019 734,409
 130.60
 - -
November 25, 2019 through December 29, 2019 2,327,205
 141.91
 - -
Total 3,061,614
   
  

(1)
During the fiscal fourth quarter of 2019, the Company repurchased an aggregate of 3,061,614 shares of Johnson & Johnson Common Stock in open-market transactions, of which 3,061,614 shares were purchased in open-market transactions as part of a systematic plan to meet the needs of the Company’s compensation programs.
(2)
As of September 29, 2019, the share repurchase program was completed with an aggregate of 37,181,268 shares purchased for a total of $5.0 billion since the inception of the repurchase program announced on December 17, 2018.






1520




Item 6.SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA
Summary of Operations and Statistical Data 2009-2019
(Dollars in Millions Except Per Share Amounts)2019 2018 2017 2016 2015 2014 2013 2012 2011 2010 2009
Sales to customers — U.S. $42,097 41,884 39,863 37,811 35,687 34,782
 31,910
 29,830
 28,908
 29,450
 30,889
Sales to customers — International39,962 39,697 36,587 34,079 34,387 39,549
 39,402
 37,394
 36,122
 32,137
 31,008
Total sales82,059 81,581 76,450 71,890 70,074 74,331
 71,312
 67,224
 65,030
 61,587
 61,897
Cost of products sold27,556 27,091 25,439 21,789 21,426 22,684
 22,181
 21,515
 20,219
 18,688
 18,380
Selling, marketing and administrative expenses22,178 22,540 21,520 20,067 21,079 21,887
 21,650
 20,697
 20,800
 19,296
 19,712
Research and development expense11,355 10,775 10,594 9,143 8,999 8,471
 8,119
 7,602
 7,486
 6,796
 6,949
In-process research and development890 1,126 408 29 224 178
 580
 1,163
 
 
 
Interest income(357) (611) (385) (368) (128) (67) (74) (64) (91) (107) (90)
Interest expense, net of portion capitalized318 1,005 934 726 552 533
 482
 532
 571
 455
 451
Other (income) expense, net2,525 1,405 (42) 210 (1,783) 82
 2,903
 2,004
 3,115
 (488) (333)
Restructuring266 251 309 491 509 
 
 
 569
 
 1,073
 64,731 63,582 58,777 52,087 50,878 53,768
 55,841
 53,449
 52,669
 44,640
 46,142
Earnings before provision for taxes on income$17,328 17,999 17,673 19,803 19,196 20,563
 15,471
 13,775
 12,361
 16,947
 15,755
Provision for taxes on income2,209 2,702 16,373 3,263 3,787 4,240
 1,640
 3,261
 2,689
 3,613
 3,489
Net earnings15,119 15,297 1,300 16,540 15,409 16,323
 13,831
 10,514
 9,672
 13,334
 12,266
Add: Net loss attributable to noncontrolling interest     
 
 339
 
 
 
Net earnings attributable to Johnson & Johnson15,119 15,297 1,300 16,540 15,409 16,323
 13,831
 10,853
 9,672
 13,334
 12,266
Percent of sales to customers18.4% 18.8 1.7 23.0 22.0 22.0
 19.4
 16.1
 14.9
 21.7
 19.8
Diluted net earnings per share of common stock (1)
$5.63 5.61 0.47 5.93 5.48 5.70
 4.81
 3.86
 3.49
 4.78
 4.40
Percent return on average shareholders’ equity25.4% 25.5 2.0 23.4 21.9 22.7
 19.9
 17.8
 17.0
 24.9
 26.4
Percent increase (decrease) over previous year:                 
  
  
Sales to customers0.6% 6.7 6.3 2.6 (5.7) 4.2
 6.1
 3.4
 5.6
 (0.5) (2.9)
Diluted net earnings per share0.4% N/M (92.1) 8.2 (3.9) 18.5
 24.6
 10.6
 (27.0) 8.6
 (3.7)
Supplementary balance sheet data:                 
  
  
Property, plant and equipment, net17,658 17,035 17,005 15,912 15,905 16,126
 16,710
 16,097
 14,739
 14,553
 14,759
Additions to property, plant and equipment3,498 3,670 3,279 3,226 3,463 3,714
 3,595
 2,934
 2,893
 2,384
 2,365
Total assets157,728 152,954 157,303 141,208 133,411 130,358
 131,754
 121,347
 113,644
 102,908
 94,682
Long-term debt26,494 27,684 30,675 22,442 12,857 15,122
 13,328
 11,489
 12,969
 9,156
 8,223
Operating cash flow23,416 22,201 21,056 18,767 19,569 18,710
 17,414
 15,396
 14,298
 16,385
 16,571
Common stock information                 
  
  
Dividends paid per share3.75 3.54 3.32 3.15 2.95 2.76
 2.59
 2.40
 2.25
 2.11
 1.93
Shareholders’ equity per share22.59 22.44 22.43 26.02 25.82 25.06
 26.25
 23.33
 20.95
 20.66
 18.37
Market price per share (year-end close)$145.75 127.27 139.72 115.21 102.72 105.06
 92.35
 69.48
 65.58
 61.85
 64.41
Average shares outstanding (millions)                     
 — basic2,645.1 2,681.5 2,692.0 2,737.3 2,771.8 2,815.2
 2,809.2
 2,753.3
 2,736.0
 2,751.4
 2,759.5
 — diluted2,684.3 2,728.7 2,745.3 2,788.9 2,812.9 2,863.9
 2,877.0
 2,812.6
 2,775.3
 2,788.8
 2,789.1
Employees (thousands)132.2 135.1 134.0 126.4 127.1 126.5
 128.1
 127.6
 117.9
 114.0
 115.5
(1) Item 7.Attributable to Johnson & JohnsonMANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF RESULTS OF OPERATIONS AND FINANCIAL CONDITION
N/M = Not Meaningful




16



Item 7.MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF RESULTS OF OPERATIONS AND FINANCIAL CONDITION
Organization and Business Segments
Description of the Company and Business Segments
Johnson & Johnson and its subsidiaries (the Company) have approximately 132,200141,700 employees worldwide engaged in the research and development, manufacture and sale of a broad range of products in the health carehealthcare field. The Company conducts business in virtually all countries of the world with the primary focus on products related to human health and well-being.
The Company is organized into three business segments: Consumer Health, Pharmaceutical and Medical Devices. The Consumer Health segment includes a broad range of products used in the baby care, oral care, beauty, over-the-counterBaby Care, Oral Care, Skin Health/Beauty, Over-the-Counter pharmaceutical, women’s healthWomen’s Health and wound careWound Care markets. These products are marketed to the general public and sold bothonline (eCommerce) and to retail outlets and distributors throughout the world. The Pharmaceutical segment is focused on six therapeutic areas, including immunology, infectiousImmunology, Infectious diseases, neuroscience, oncology, pulmonary hypertension,Neuroscience, Oncology, Pulmonary Hypertension, and cardiovascularCardiovascular and metabolicMetabolic diseases. Products in this segment are distributed directly to retailers, wholesalers, distributors, hospitals and health carehealthcare professionals for prescription use. The Medical Devices segment includes a broad range of products used in the orthopaedic, surgery, interventional solutionsOrthopaedic, Surgery, Interventional Solutions (cardiovascular and neurovascular) and eye healthVision fields. These products are distributed to wholesalers, hospitals and retailers, and used principally in the professional fields by physicians, nurses, hospitals, eye care professionals and clinics.
The Executive Committee of Johnson & Johnson is the principal management group responsible for the strategic operations and allocation of the resources of the Company. This Committee oversees and coordinates the activities of the Consumer Health, Pharmaceutical and Medical Devices business segments.
In all of its product lines, the Company competes with other companies both locally and globally, throughout the world. Competition exists in all product lines without regard to the number and size of the competing companies involved. Competition in research, involving the development and the improvement of new and existing products and processes, is particularly significant. The development of new and innovative products, as well as protecting the underlying intellectual property of the Company's product portfolio, is important to the Company’s success in all areas of its business. The competitive environment requires substantial investments in continuing research. In addition, the development and maintenance of customer demand for the Company’s consumer products involves significant expenditures for advertising and promotion.

Management’s Objectives
With “Our Credo” as the foundation, the Company’s purpose is to blend heart, science and ingenuity to profoundly change the trajectory of health for humanity. The Company is committed to bringing its full breadth and depth to ensure health for people today and for future generations. United around this common ambition, the Company is poised to fulfill its purpose and successfully meet the demands of the rapidly evolving markets in which it competes.
The Company is broadly based in human healthcare, and is committed to creating value by developing accessible, high quality, innovative products and services. New products introduced within the past five years accounted for approximately 25% of 20192021 sales. In 2019, $11.42021, $14.7 billion was invested in research and development and $5.8 billion spent on acquisitions, reflecting management’s commitment to create life-enhancing innovations and to create value through partnerships that will profoundly change the trajectory of health for humanity.
A critical driver of the Company’s success is the 132,200 diversediversity of its 141,700 employees worldwide. Employees are empowered and inspired to lead with the Company’s Our Credo and purpose as guides. This allows every employee to use the Company’s reach and size to advance the Company's purpose, and to also lead with agility and urgency. Leveraging the extensive resources across the enterprise enables the Company to innovate and execute with excellence. This ensures the Company can remain focused on addressing the unmet needs of society every day and invest for an enduring impact, ultimately delivering value to its patients, consumers and healthcare professionals, employees, communities and shareholders.

chart-9ff0d624aa285774ab6.jpgjnj-20220102_g2.jpgchart-983466494a9a5b4ba93.jpgjnj-20220102_g3.jpgchart-98febd78d70a515ead5.jpgjnj-20220102_g4.jpg


1721




Results of Operations
Analysis of Consolidated Sales
For discussion on results of operations and financial condition pertaining to the fiscal years 20182020 and 20172019 see the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 30, 2018,January 3, 2021, Item 7. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Results of Operations and Financial Condition.

In 2019,2021, worldwide sales increased 0.6%13.6% to $82.1$93.8 billion as compared to an increase of 6.7%0.6% in 2018.2020. These sales changes consisted of the following:

Sales increase/(decrease) due to: 2019 2018Sales increase/(decrease) due to:20212020
Volume 3.7 % 8.5 %Volume12.9 %3.5 %
Price (0.9) (2.2)Price(0.7)(2.3)
Currency (2.2) 0.4
Currency1.4 (0.6)
Total 0.6 % 6.7 %Total13.6 %0.6 %

The net impact of acquisitions and divestitures on the worldwide sales growth was a negative impact of 1.7%0.6% in 20192021 and a positivenegative impact of 0.8%0.3% in 2018.2020.
Sales by U.S. companies were $42.1$47.2 billion in 20192021 and $41.9$43.1 billion in 2018.2020. This represents increases of 0.5%9.3% in 20192021 and 5.1%2.5% in 2018.2020. Sales by international companies were $40.0$46.6 billion in 20192021 and $39.7$39.5 billion in 2018.2020. This represents an increase of 0.7%18.2% in 20192021 and 8.5%a decrease of 1.3% in 2018.2020.
The five-year compound annual growth rates for worldwide, U.S. and international sales were 2.0%5.5%, 3.9%4.5% and 0.2%6.5%, respectively. The ten-year compound annual growth rates for worldwide, U.S. and international sales were 2.9%3.7%, 3.1%5.0% and 2.6%, respectively.
In 2019,2021, sales by companies in Europe experienced a sales declineachieved growth of 1.5%24.3% as compared to the prior year, which included operational growth of 3.8% offset by20.7% and a negativepositive currency impact of 5.3%3.6%. Sales by companies in the Western Hemisphere (excluding the U.S.) experienced a sales declineachieved growth of 2.8%7.8% as compared to the prior year, which included operational growth of 5.7% offset by7.3% and a negativepositive currency impact of 8.5%0.5%. Sales by companies in the Asia-Pacific, Africa region achieved growth of 4.9%14.1% as compared to the prior year, including operational growth of 6.9% partially offset by11.4% and a negativepositive currency impact of 2.0%2.7%.
The Company estimated that the inclusion of a 53rd week in the fiscal year 2020 results negatively impacted the 2021 comparative sales growth by approximately 1.0%. (See Note 1 to the Consolidated Financial Statements for Annual Closing Date details). While the additional week added a few days to sales, it also added a full week's worth of operating costs; therefore, the net earnings impact was negligible.
In 2019,2021, the Company utilized three wholesalers distributing products for all three segments that represented approximately 15.0%, 12.0% and 11.0% of the total consolidated revenues. In 2018, the Company had three wholesalers distributing products for all three segments that represented approximately 14.0%, 11.0% and 11.0% of the total consolidated revenues. In 2020, the Company had three wholesalers distributing products for all three segments that represented approximately 16.0%, 12.0% and 12.0% of the total consolidated revenues.


jnj-20220102_g5.jpgjnj-20220102_g6.jpg


chart-035f7b06f212532ca24.jpgchart-1ac36ca0d1a4503ca1c.jpg



Note: values may have been rounded
1822





Analysis of Sales by Business Segments
Consumer Health Segment
Consumer Health segment sales in 20192021 were $13.9$14.6 billion, an increase of 0.3%4.1% from 2018,2020, which included 3.0%2.8% operational growth and a negativepositive currency impact of 2.7%1.3%. U.S. Consumer Health segment sales were $5.8$6.5 billion, an increase of 1.4%2.4%. International sales were $8.1 billion, a decreasean increase of 0.4%5.6%, which included 4.2%3.1% operational growth and a negativepositive currency impact of 4.6%2.5%. In 2019,2021, acquisitions and divestitures had a net positivenegative impact of 1.6%1.0% on the operational sales growth of the worldwide Consumer Health segment.
Major Consumer Health Franchise Sales:
   % Change
(Dollars in Millions)20212020’21 vs. ’20
OTC$5,227 4,824 8.4 %
Skin Health/Beauty4,541 4,450 2.0 
Oral Care1,645 1,641 0.2 
Baby Care1,566 1,517 3.2 
Women’s Health917 901 1.8 
Wound Care/Other739 720 2.6 
Total Consumer Health Sales$14,635 14,053 4.1 %
      % Change
(Dollars in Millions) 2019 2018 ’19 vs. ’18
Beauty $4,593
 4,382
 4.8 %
OTC 4,444
 4,334
 2.5
Baby Care 1,675
 1,858
 (9.9)
Oral Care 1,528
 1,555
 (1.7)
Women’s Health 986
 1,049
 (6.0)
Wound Care/Other 671
 675
 (0.6)
Total Consumer Sales $13,898
 13,853
 0.3 %

The BeautyOTC franchise sales of $4.6$5.2 billion increased 4.8%8.4% as compared to the prior year. Growth was primarily driven by incremental sales from the acquisition of Ci:z Holdings Co., Ltd., (DR.CI:LABO) in Japan as well as market growth and share gains of NEUTROGENAattributable to Analgesics, TYLENOL® and AVEENOMOTRIN®products. Growth was partially offset by, digestive health and the divestitures of RoC® and NIZORAL® in the fiscal year 2018.hydration benefit offering (ORSL).
The Over-the-Counter (OTC)Skin Health/Beauty franchise sales of $4.4$4.5 billion increased 2.5%2.0% as compared to the prior year. Growth was primarily drivendue to COVID-19 recovery, strong performance of NEUTROGENA® and AVEENO®, and eCommerce acceleration partially offset by incrementalthe divestiture of DR. CI:LABO - Sedona business in Asia Pacific and external supply constraints.
The Oral Care franchise sales from the acquisition of ZARBEES®.Additional contributors$1.6 billion increased 0.2% as compared to the prior year. Market growthwere TYLENOL®, Children's MOTRIN®, digestive health products in the U.S. along with strong performance in the Asia Pacific region due to successful brand building and anti-smoking aids.promotional campaigns and the positive impact of currency offset the negative impact of the floss divestiture and U.S. external supply constraints.
The Baby Care franchise sales were $1.7of $1.6 billion in 2019, a decrease of 9.9% compared to the prior year, primarily due to JOHNSON’s® competitive pressures coupled with comparisons to prior year relaunch activities and the Baby Center divestiture.
The Oral Care franchise sales of $1.5 billion decreased 1.7% as compared to the prior year. Growth in LISTERINE® Mouthwash and Ready Tabs outside the U.S. was offset by share declines and retailer destocking in the U.S. and the negative impact of currency.
The Women’s Health franchise sales were $1.0 billion in 2019, a decrease of 6.0% as compared to the prior year. The decline was primarily driven by the negative impact of currency and weakness in liners partially offset by strength in napkins in Asia Pacific and Latin America.
The Wound Care/Other franchise sales were $0.7 billion in 2019, a decrease of 0.6% as compared to the prior year. The decline was primarily driven by the divestiture of COMPEED® outside the U.S. and the negative impact of currency.






19




Pharmaceutical Segment
Pharmaceutical segment sales in 2019 were $42.2 billion, an increase of 3.6% from 2018, which included operational growth of 5.8% and a negative currency impact of 2.2%. U.S. sales were $23.9 billion, an increase of 2.5%. International sales were $18.3 billion, an increase of 5.0%, which included 10.1% operational growth and a negative currency impact of 5.1%. In 2019, the net impact of acquisitions and divestitures on the Pharmaceutical segment operational sales growth was negligible. Adjustments to previous reserve estimates, as compared to the prior year, positively impacted the Pharmaceutical segment operational growth by approximately 1.3%, primarily in the Immunology and Cardiovascular/Metabolism/Other therapeutic areas.


Major Pharmaceutical Therapeutic Area Sales:
      % Change
(Dollars in Millions) 2019 2018 ’19 vs. ’18
Total Immunology $13,950
 13,120
 6.3 %
     REMICADE®
 4,380
 5,326
 (17.8)
     SIMPONI®/SIMPONI ARIA®
 2,188
 2,084
 5.0
     STELARA®
 6,361
 5,156
 23.4
     TREMFYA®
 1,012
 544
 85.9
     Other Immunology 10
 10
 4.5
Total Infectious Diseases 3,413
 3,304
 3.3
     EDURANT®/rilpivirine
 861
 816
 5.6
     PREZISTA®/ PREZCOBIX®/REZOLSTA®/SYMTUZA®
 2,110
 1,955
 8.0
     Other Infectious Diseases 441
 533
 (17.3)
Total Neuroscience 6,328
 6,077
 4.1
     CONCERTA®/methylphenidate
 696
 663
 4.9
     INVEGA SUSTENNA®/XEPLION®/INVEGA TRINZA®/TREVICTA®
 3,330
 2,928
 13.7
     RISPERDAL CONSTA®
 688
 737
 (6.7)
     Other Neuroscience 1,614
 1,749
 (7.7)
Total Oncology 10,692
 9,844
 8.6
     DARZALEX®
 2,998
 2,025
 48.0
     IMBRUVICA®
 3,411
 2,615
 30.4
     VELCADE®
 751
 1,116
 (32.7)
     ZYTIGA® /abiraterone acetate
 2,795
 3,498
 (20.1)
     Other Oncology 739
 590
 25.0
Total Pulmonary Hypertension 2,623
 2,573
 1.9
     OPSUMIT®
 1,327
 1,215
 9.2
     TRACLEER® /bosentan
 341
 546
 (37.5)
     UPTRAVI®
 819
 663
 23.5
     Other Pulmonary Hypertension 135
 149
 (9.4)
Total Cardiovascular / Metabolism / Other 5,192
 5,816
 (10.7)
     XARELTO®
 2,313
 2,477
 (6.6)
     INVOKANA®/ INVOKAMET®
 735
 881
 (16.5)
     PROCRIT®/EPREX®
 790
 988
 (20.0)
     Other 1,353
 1,470
 (8.0)
Total Pharmaceutical Sales $42,198
 40,734
 3.6 %



20



Immunology products sales were $14.0 billion in 2019, representing an increase of 6.3% asincreased 3.2% compared to the prior year. Growth was driven by AVEENO® Asia Pacific eCommerce strength, innovation and COVID-19 recovery.
The Women’s Health franchise sales of $0.9 billion increased 1.8% as compared to the prior year primarily driven by COVID-19 market recovery, favorable price and strong brand building in Asia Pacific partially offset by disruptions in Europe due to flooding.
The Wound Care/Other franchise sales of $0.7 billion increased 2.6% as compared to the prior year. Growth was due to strong performance of BAND-AID® Brand Adhesive Bandages in the U.S. partially offset by product discontinuations and competitive pressures in Asia Pacific.
In November 2021, the Company announced its intention to separate the Company’s Consumer Health business, with the intention to create a new, publicly traded company. The Company is targeting completion of the planned separation in 18 to 24 months after initial announcement.



23



Pharmaceutical Segment
Pharmaceutical segment sales in 2021 were $52.1 billion, an increase of 14.3% from 2020, which included operational growth of 13.1% and a positive currency impact of 1.2%. U.S. sales were $28.0 billion, an increase of 8.6%. International sales were $24.1 billion, an increase of 21.6%, which included 18.8% operational growth and a positive currency impact of 2.8%. In 2021, acquisitions and divestitures had a net negative impact of 0.5% on the operational sales growth of the worldwide Pharmaceutical segment. Adjustments to previous sales reserve estimates were approximately $0.7 billion and $0.6 billion in fiscal years 2021 and 2020, respectively.

Major Pharmaceutical Therapeutic Area Sales*:
% Change
(Dollars in Millions)20212020’21 vs. ’20
Total Immunology$16,750 15,055 11.3 %
     REMICADE®
3,190 3,747 (14.9)
     SIMPONI®/SIMPONI ARIA®
2,276 2,243 1.4 
     STELARA®
9,134 7,707 18.5 
     TREMFYA®
2,127 1,347 57.9 
     Other Immunology24 11 **
Total Infectious Diseases5,861 3,574 64.0 
     COVID-19 VACCINE2,385 — **
     EDURANT®/rilpivirine
994 964 3.1 
     PREZISTA®/ PREZCOBIX®/REZOLSTA®/SYMTUZA®
2,083 2,184 (4.6)
     Other Infectious Diseases399 427 (6.5)
Total Neuroscience7,011 6,548 7.1 
     CONCERTA®/methylphenidate
667 622 7.3 
     INVEGA SUSTENNA®/XEPLION®/INVEGA TRINZA®/TREVICTA®
4,022 3,653 10.1 
     RISPERDAL CONSTA®
592 642 (7.7)
     Other Neuroscience1,729 1,632 6.0 
Total Oncology14,548 12,367 17.6 
     DARZALEX®
6,023 4,190 43.8 
     ERLEADA®
1,291 760 70.0 
     IMBRUVICA®
4,369 4,128 5.8 
     ZYTIGA® /abiraterone acetate
2,297 2,470 (7.0)
     Other Oncology(1)
568 821 (30.8)
Total Pulmonary Hypertension3,450 3,148 9.6 
     OPSUMIT®
1,819 1,639 11.0 
     UPTRAVI®
1,237 1,093 13.1 
     Other Pulmonary Hypertension395 416 (5.0)
Total Cardiovascular / Metabolism / Other4,460 4,878 (8.6)
     XARELTO®
2,438 2,345 4.0 
     INVOKANA®/ INVOKAMET®
563 795 (29.3)
     PROCRIT®/EPREX®
479 552 (13.3)
     Other981 1,186 (17.3)
Total Pharmaceutical Sales$52,080 45,572 14.3 %
*Certain prior year amounts have been reclassified to conform to current year presentation
** Percentage greater than 100% or not meaningful
(1) Inclusive of VELCADE® which was previously disclosed separately


24


Immunology products achieved sales of $16.8 billion in 2021, representing an increase of 11.3% as compared to the prior year driven by strong uptake of STELARA® (ustekinumab) in Crohn's disease and Ulcerative Colitis and strength in TREMFYA® (guselkumab) in Psoriasis expanded indications of SIMPONI®/SIMPONI ARIA® (golimumab), and the U.S. immunology market growth. Immunologyuptake in Psoriatic Arthritis. This was negatively impactedpartially offset by lower sales of REMICADE® (infliximab) due to increased discounts/rebates and biosimilar competition.
The patents for REMICADE® (infliximab)in certain countries in Europe expired in February 2015. Biosimilar versions of REMICADE® have been introduced in the United States and certain markets outside the U.S., resulting in a reduction in sales of REMICADE® in those markets. Additional biosimilar competition will likely result in a further reduction in REMICADE® sales in markets outside the United States. In the U.S., a biosimilar version of REMICADE® was introduced in 2016,States and additional competitors continue to enter the market. Continued infliximab biosimilar competition in the U.S. market will result in a further reduction in U.S. sales of REMICADE®. See Note 21
The latest expiring United States patent for STELARA® (ustekinumab) will expire in September 2023. STELARA® (ustekinumab) U.S. sales in fiscal 2021 were approximately $5.9 billion. The expiration of a product patent or loss of market exclusivity is likely to the Consolidated Financial Statements forresult in a description of legal matters regarding the REMICADE® patents.reduction in sales.
Infectious disease products achieved sales were $3.4of $5.9 billion in 2019,2021, representing an increase of 3.3%64.0% as compared to the prior year. Strong salesGrowth was primarily driven by the contribution of SYMTUZA® andthe launch of JULUCA®COVID-19 vaccine. (dolutegravir/rilpivirine) wereThis was partially offset by lower sales of PREZISTA® and PREZCOBIX®/REZOLSTA® (darunavir/cobicistat) due to increased competition and loss of exclusivity of PREZISTA® in certain countries outside the U.S.
Neuroscience products achieved sales were $6.3of $7.0 billion, representing an increase of 4.1%7.1% as compared to the prior year. StrongPaliperidone long-acting injectables growth was driven by sales of long-acting injectablesINVEGA SUSTENNA®/XEPLION® (paliperidone palmitate) and INVEGA TRINZA®/TREVICTA®(paliperidone palmitate) and INVEGA SUSTENNA®/XEPLION® were partially offset by cannibalizationfrom new patient starts and persistence as well as the launch of RISPERDAL CONSTA® (risperidone)INVEGA HAFYERA™.
Oncology products achieved sales of $10.7$14.5 billion in 2019,2021, representing an increase of 8.6%17.6% as compared to the prior year. Contributors to the growth were strong sales of DARZALEX® (daratumumab) withdriven by continued strong market growth, share gains in all regions and share gain,solid uptake of the subcutaneous formulation launched in 2020; the continued global launch uptake of ERLEADA® (apalutamide) and IMBRUVICA® (ibrutinib) due to increased patient uptake globally. Additionally, sales from the launch of ERLEADA™ (apalutamide) contributed to the growth. Growth was negatively impacted from a decline in U.S. sales of ZYTIGA® (abiraterone acetate)growth primarily driven by generic competitionmarket and continued share leadership. The growth of IMBRUVICA® (ibrutinib) was partially offset by increased sales outside the U.S. Lower sales of VELCADE® (bortezomib) were also due to generic competition.competitive pressures from novel oral agents and COVID-19 related market dynamics including delays in new patient starts.
Pulmonary Hypertension products achieved sales of $2.6$3.5 billion, representing an increase of 1.9%9.6% as compared to the prior year. Sales growth of OPSUMIT® (macitentan) and UPTRAVI® (selexipag) were due to continued market growth and increased share gains while sales of TRACLEER® (bosentan) were negatively impacted by generics and cannibalization from OPSUMIT®.market growth.
Cardiovascular/Metabolism/Other products sales were $5.2$4.5 billion, a decline of 10.7%8.6% as compared to the prior year. XARELTO® (rivaroxaban) sales volume growthThe decline was offset by higher discounts and rebates. Lowerprimarily attributable to lower sales of INVOKANA®/INVOKAMET® (canagliflozin) were due to share loss from competitive pressureerosion and a safety label update in the U.S. and lower sales of PROCRIT®/ EPREX® (epoetin alfa) were due to biosimilar competition.


2125



During 2019,2021, the Company advanced its pipeline with several regulatory submissions and approvals for new drugs and additional indications for existing drugs as follows:
Product Name (Chemical Name)IndicationUS ApprovalEU ApprovalUS FilingEU Filing
BALVERSA™ (erdafitinib)
BYANNLI®
Maintenance Treatment of locally advanced or metastatic urothelial cancerSchizophrenia in AdultsŸ
CABENUVA (rilpivirine and cabotegravir)HIV treatment for use every two months
COVID-19 VaccineCOVID-19 Emergency Use
COVID-19 Vaccine Booster ShotCOVID-19 Emergency Use
DARZALEX® (daratumumab)
Combination RegimenSubcutaneous (SC) formulation Treatment for Newly Diagnosed Transplant-eligibleSystemic Light Chain Amyloidosis and Gains an Additional Approval in Pre-Treated Multiple Myeloma
DARZALEX FASPRO® (daratumumab and hyaluronidase-fihj)
Combination with Carfilzomib and Dexamethasone for Patients with Multiple Myeloma

After First or Subsequent Relapse
ŸŸ
INVEGA HAFYERA (paliperidone palmitate)Newly diagnosed patientsFirst and Only Twice-Yearly Treatment for Adults with Multiple Myeloma in combination with Lenalidomide and DexamethasoneSchizophreniaŸ
PONVORY (Ponesimod)Split-dosing regimenTreatment of Adults with Relapsing Forms of Multiple Sclerosis with Active Disease Defined by Clinical or Imaging FeaturesŸ
PONVORY (Ponesimod)Combination therapyOral Treatment for transplant ineligibleAdults with Relapsing Multiple Myeloma patientsSclerosisŸŸ
RYBREVANT (amivantamab-vmjw)
Subcutaneous Formulation in Multiple Myeloma

ŸŸ
 ERLEADA™ (apalutamide)Treatment of Metastatic Castration-Sensitive Prostate CancerŸ
Treatment of Metastatic Hormone-Sensitive Prostate CancerŸ
IMBRUVICA®  (ibrutinib)
Expanded Use in Combination with Obinutuzumab in Adultfor Patients with Previously Untreated Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia and in CombinationNon-Small Cell Lung Cancer with Rituximab in Waldenström's Macroglobulinemia

EGFR Exon 20 Insertion Mutations
Ÿ
Treatment for Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia in combination with obinutuzumabŸ
INVOKANA®  (canagliflozin)
Treatment of Diabetic Kidney Disease

Ÿ
rilpivirine and cabotegravir

For Monthly, Injectable, Two Drug Regimen for Treatment of HIV

ŸŸ
SPRAVATO® (esketamine)
Treatment-resistant depressionRapid reduction of depressive symptoms in a psychiatric emergency for patients with major depressive disorderŸŸ
Rapid Reduction of Depressive Symptoms in Adults with Major Depressive Disorder who have Active Suicidal Ideation with Intent

Ÿ
STELARA® (ustekinumab)
Extended Use for the Treatment of Moderately to Severely Active Ulcerative Colitis

ŸŸ
Treatment of Pediatric Patients with Moderate to Severe Plaque Psoriasis

Juvenille Psoriatic Arthritis
Ÿ
TeclistamabTreatment of Patients with Relapsed or Refractory Multiple Myeloma
TREMFYAUPTRAVI® (guselkumab)
(selexipag)
One-press patient-controlled injectorIntravenous Use in Adult Patients with Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension (PAH)
Ÿ
Treatment of Adults with Active Psoriatic ArthritisŸŸ
XARELTO® (rivaroxaban)
For the prevention ofHelp Prevent and Treat Blood Clots in Acutely Ill MedicalPediatric Patients


XARELTO® (rivaroxaban)
ŸExpanded Peripheral Artery Disease (PAD) Indication to Include Patients After Lower-Extremity Revascularization (LER)

2226




Medical Devices Segment
The Medical Devices segment sales in 20192021 were $26.0$27.1 billion, a decreasean increase of 3.8%17.9% from 2018,2020, which included an operational decreasegrowth of 1.7%16.2% and a negativepositive currency impact of 2.1%1.7%. U.S. sales were $12.4$12.7 billion, a decreasean increase of 3.5%14.9% as compared to the prior year. International sales were $13.6$14.4 billion, a decreasean increase of 4.1%20.6% as compared to the prior year, with anwhich included operational decreasegrowth of 0.1%17.3% and a negativepositive currency impact of 4.0%3.3%. In 2019,2021, the net impact of acquisitions and divestitures on the Medical Devices segment worldwide operational sales growth was a negative 5.6%0.6% primarily due to the divestiture of which, the divestitures of LifeScan and Advanced Sterilization Products (ASP). The Company has seen a market recovery in global procedural volumes in the Medical Devices segment as compared to the prior year which had an impactsignificant negative impacts from COVID-19. This procedural volume recovery is the primary driver of approximately 3.8%sales and 1.6%, respectively.earnings growth as compared to the prior year.
Major Medical Devices Franchise Sales:
     % Change   % Change
(Dollars in Millions) 2019 2018 ’19 vs. ’18(Dollars in Millions)20212020’21 vs. ’20
Surgery $9,501
 9,901
 (4.0)%Surgery$9,812 8,232 19.2 %
Advanced 4,095
 4,002
 2.3
Advanced4,622 3,839 20.4 
General 4,480
 4,557
 (1.7) General5,190 4,392 18.1 
Specialty 926
 1,342
 (31.0)
Orthopaedics 8,839
 8,885
 (0.5)Orthopaedics8,588 7,763 10.6 
Hips 1,438
 1,418
 1.4
Hips1,485 1,280 16.0 
Knees 1,480
 1,502
 (1.4) Knees1,325 1,170 13.3 
Trauma 2,720
 2,699
 0.8
Trauma2,885 2,614 10.4 
Spine & Other 3,201
 3,266
 (2.0)
Spine, Sports & Other Spine, Sports & Other2,893 2,699 7.2 
Vision 4,624
 4,553
 1.6
Vision4,688 3,919 19.6 
Contact Lenses/Other 3,392
 3,302
 2.7
Contact Lenses/Other3,440 2,994 14.9 
Surgical 1,232
 1,251
 (1.6) Surgical1,248 925 34.9 
Interventional Solutions
 2,997
 2,646
 13.3
Interventional Solutions
3,971 3,046 30.4 
Diabetes Care(1)
 
 1,009
 *
Total Medical Devices Sales $25,963
 26,994
 (3.8)%Total Medical Devices Sales$27,060 22,959 17.9 %
(1)LifeScan was divested in the fiscal fourth quarter of 2018.
*Percentage greater than 100% or not meaningful

The Surgery franchise achieved sales were $9.5of $9.8 billion in 2019, a decrease2021 representing an increase of 4.0%19.2% from 2018. Growth2020. The growth in Advanced Surgery was primarily driven by endocutter, biosurgeryEndocutter, Biosurgery and energy products.Energy products attributable to market recovery, market expansion and the success of new products offsetting competitive pressures in the U.S. The declinegrowth in General Surgery was primarily driven by market recovery and the negative impactcontinued strength of currencythe suture portfolio partially offset by the impact of the ASP divestiture in the prior year.
The Orthopaedics franchise achieved sales of $8.6 billion in 2021, representing an increase of 10.6% from 2020. The growth in hips reflects the market recovery combined with continued strength of wound closure products.the portfolio including the ACTIS® stem and enabling technologies – KINCISE™ and VELYS™ Hip Navigation. The declinegrowth in Specialty Surgeryknees was primarily driven by the divestiture of the sterilization business (ASP) partially offset by growth of aesthetic products.
The Orthopaedics franchise sales were $8.8 billion in 2019, a decrease of 0.5%, including operational growth of 1.2% offset by a negative currency impact of 1.7% as compared to the prior year.procedure recovery and new product introductions. The growth in hipsTrauma was driven by leadership position in the anterior approach, strongglobal market demand for the ACTIS® stemrecovery and the KINCISE™ surgical automated system. Knees grew outside the U.S. from new products coupled with continued global uptake of ATTUNE® Revision, offset by a negative currency impact. Growth in trauma was due to strong market growth coupled with continued uptake of new products. The declinegrowth in Spine, Sports & Other was primarily driven by base business declines in Spine partially offset by growth in Sports which was led byprocedure recovery and new products, MONOVISC® in the U.S. and growth in Asia Pacific.product introductions.
The Vision franchise achieved sales of $4.6$4.7 billion in 2019,2021, representing an increase of 1.6%19.6% from 2018. Growth2020. The Contact Lenses/Other operational growth was primarily driven by the strength of daily disposable lenses in the ACUVUE® OASYS contact lenses category. Thedue to market recovery and market share gains from new products. Surgical Vision operational growth was primarily driven by the strengthdue to market recovery and uptake of cataracts outside the U.S. partially offset by competitive pressures in the U.S.recently launched products.
The Interventional Solutions franchise achieved sales of $3.0$4.0 billion in 2019,2021, an increase of 13.3%30.4% from 2018. Strong growth2020. Growth in the electrophysiology business wasand stroke businesses were driven by Atrial Fibrillation procedure growthmarket recovery and with strong THERMOCOOL SMARTTOUCH® SF Contact Force Sensing Cathetersuccess of new products and diagnostic catheter sales.commercial strategies.




Beginning in the fiscal first quarter of 2022, the Medical Devices segment will be referred to as the MedTech segment.
2327




Analysis of Consolidated Earnings Before Provision for Taxes on Income
Consolidated earnings before provision for taxes on income was $17.3$22.8 billion and $18.0$16.5 billion for the fiscal years ended 20192021 and 2018,2020, respectively. As a percent to sales, consolidated earnings before provision for taxes on income was 21.1%24.3% and 22.1%20.0%, in 20192021 and 2018,2020, respectively.

chart-1854133c01565e83bbe.jpgjnj-20220102_g7.jpg
(Dollars in billions. Percentages in chart are as a percent to total sales)


Cost of Products Sold and Selling, Marketing and Administrative Expenses:

jnj-20220102_g8.jpgjnj-20220102_g9.jpg
(Dollars in billions. Percentages in chart are as a percent to total sales)

Cost of products sold and selling, marketing and administrative expensesdecreased as a percent to sales were as follows:
driven by:
% of Sales 2019 2018
Cost of products sold 33.6% 33.2
Percent point increase/(decrease) over the prior year 0.4
 (0.1)
Selling, marketing and administrative expenses 27.0% 27.6
Percent point increase/(decrease) over the prior year (0.6) (0.5)
Non-recurring prior year COVID-19 production related slow-downs and related inventory impacts

Fixed cost deleveraging in the Medical Devices business in the fiscal 2020
In 2019, cost of products sold as a percent to sales increased to 33.6% from 33.2% as compared to the same period a year ago primarily driven by the negative impact of currency inFavorable mix within the Pharmaceutical business as well as increased intangible asset amortization expense. Intangible asset amortization expense of $4.5 billion was included in cost of products sold for 2019 as compared to $4.4 billion in 2018. There was a decrease inat the percent to sales of selling, marketing and administrative expenses in 2019 as compared to the prior year, primarily due to favorable segment mixenterprise level with a higher percentage of sales coming from the Pharmaceutical business planned prioritization and reduced brand marketing expense
Supply chain efficiencies in the Consumer business partially offset by increased sellingHealth segment
The intangible asset amortization expense included in cost of products sold was $4.7 billion for both fiscal years 2021 and marketing investments2020.

28



Selling, Marketing and Administrative Expenses decreased as a percent to sales driven by:
Leveraging in the Medical Devices business.business resulting from the recovery of sales from the prior years impact of COVID-19

Partially offset by:
Increased brand marketing expenses in the Consumer Health business

Research and Development Expense:
Research and development expense by segment of business was as follows:
  2019 2018
(Dollars in Millions) Amount % of Sales* Amount % of Sales*
Consumer $493
 3.5% 565
 4.1
Pharmaceutical 8,834
 20.9
 8,446
 20.7
Medical Devices 2,028
 7.8
 1,764
 6.5
Total research and development expense $11,355
 13.8% 10,775
 13.2
Percent increase/(decrease) over the prior year 5.4%  
 1.7
  
*As a percent to segment sales

24



 20212020
(Dollars in Millions)Amount% of Sales*Amount% of Sales*
Consumer Health$455 3.1 %$422 3.0 %
Pharmaceutical11,882 22.8 9,563 21.0 
Medical Devices2,377 8.8 2,174 9.5 
Total research and development expense$14,714 15.7 %$12,159 14.7 %
Percent increase/(decrease) over the prior year21.0 % 7.1 % 
*As a percent to segment sales
Research and development activities represent a significant part of the Company's business. These expenditures relate to the processes of discovering, testing and developing new products, upfront payments and developmental milestones, improving existing products, as well as ensuring product efficacy and regulatory compliance prior to launch. The Company remains committed to investing in research and development with the aim of delivering high quality and innovative products. In 2019, worldwide costs of research
Research and development activitiesDevelopment increased by 5.4% comparedas a percent to 2018sales primarily driven by increased investment in the Medical Devices business related to robotics and digital surgery platforms along with higher upfront and developmental milestone payments, primarily from the argenx collaborationby:
General portfolio progression in the Pharmaceutical business.business
Research facilities are located in the U.S., Belgium, Brazil, China, France, Germany, India, Israel, the Netherlands, Poland, Singapore, Sweden, Switzerland and the United Kingdom with additional R&D support in over 30 other countries.COVID-19 vaccine expenses, net of governmental reimbursements

In-Process Research and Development (IPR&D): In fiscal year 2021, the Company recorded a partial IPR&D charge of $0.9 billion primarily related to expected development delays in the general surgery digital robotics platform (Ottava) acquired with the Auris Health acquisition in 2019. The impairment charge was calculated based on revisions to the discounted cash flow valuation model reflecting a delay of first in human procedures of approximately two years from the initial acquisition model assumption of the second half of 2022. The Company will continue to monitor the remaining $1.5 billion Ottava platform intangible asset as development program activities are ongoing. In fiscal first quarter of 2019,year 2020, the Company recorded an IPR&D charge of $0.9$0.2 billion primarily related to a partial impairment due to timing and progression of one of the digital surgery platforms acquired with the Auris Health acquisition.

On January 28, 2022, subsequent to the fiscal year 2021, additional information regarding efficacy became available which led the Company to the decision to terminate the development of bermekimab for the remainingAtopic Dermatitis (AD). The Company recorded an intangible asset valueimpairment charge of approximately $0.6 billion related to thean in-process research and development program of AL-8176,asset, bermekimab (JnJ-77474462), an investigational drug for the treatment of Respiratory Syncytial Virus (RSV)AD and human metapneumovirus (hMPV) acquired with the 2014 acquisition of Alios Biopharma Inc.Hidradenitis Suppurativa (HS). The impairment charge was based on additional information, including clinical data, which became available and led to the Company's decision to abandon the development of AL-8176. In the fiscal third quarter of 2018, the Company recorded an impairment charge of $1.1 billion which included a partial impairment charge of $0.8 billionis related to the development program of AL-8176AD indication and an impairment charge of $0.3 billion foris a nonrecognized subsequent event and will be reflected in the discontinuation of the development project for an anti-thrombin antibody associated with the 2015 acquisition of XO1 Limited.first quarter 2022 financial statements. The Company acquired all rights to bermekimab from XBiotech, Inc. in fiscal year 2020.

Other (Income) Expense, Net: Other (income) expense, net is the account where the Company records gains and losses related to the sale and write-down of certain investments in equity securities held by Johnson & Johnson Innovation - JJDC, Inc. (JJDC), unrealized gains and losses on investments, income and losses associated with certain employee benefit programs, gains and losses on divestitures, certain transactional currency gains and losses, acquisition-related costs, litigation accruals and settlements, as well as royalty income.
The change in other
29


Other (income) expense, net for the fiscal year 20192021 was additional net expense of $1.1 billion primarily attributable to litigation expense of $5.1 billion in 2019, primarily related to the agreement in principle to settle opioid litigation of $4.0 billion, as compared to litigation expense of $2.0 billion in 2018. This was partially offsetfavorable by divestiture gains in 2019 of $2.2 billion of which $2.0 billion related to the divestiture of the ASP business. In addition, the fiscal year 2019 included higher unrealized gains on securities of $0.7 billion, an equity step-up gain of $0.3 billion related to the Company's previously held equity investment in DR. CI:LABO, and lower restructuring related expense of $0.2$2.4 billion as compared to the same periodprior year primarily due to the following:
(Dollars in Billions)(Income)/Expense20212020Change
Litigation expense(1)
$2.3 5.1 (2.8)
Acquisition, Integration and Divestiture related(2)
(0.5)(1.1)0.6 
(Gains)/losses on securities(0.5)(0.5)0.0 
Restructuring related0.1 0.1 0.0 
Employee benefit plan related(0.6)(0.4)(0.2)
Other(3)
(0.3)(0.3)— 
Total Other (Income) Expense, Net$0.5 2.9 (2.4)
(1)2021 is primarily related to talc and Risperdal. 2020 is primarily related to talc and the opioid litigation settlement.
(2)2021 is primarily related to divestiture gains of two pharmaceutical brands outside the U.S.
2020 is primarily driven by a year ago. Divestiture gains were approximately $1.2 billion in 2018 and included the LifeScan business, NIZORAL®, RoC® and certain non-strategic Pharmaceutical products. Additionally, 2018 included acontingent consideration reversal of a contingent liabilityapproximately $1.1 billion related to the timing of $0.2certain developmental milestones associated with the Auris Health acquisition.
(3)2021 includes Consumer Health separation costs of $0.1 billion. Costs in future years are expected to be significantly higher.

Interest (Income) Expense: The fiscal year 20192021 included net interest incomeexpense of $130 million as compared to an$90 million net interest expense in the fiscal year 2018.2020. This was primarily due to lower rates of interest earned on cash balances and a higher average debt balance, partially offset by the positive effect ofbenefit from net investment hedging arrangements and certain cross currency swaps, and a lower average debt balance.hedging. Cash, cash equivalents and marketable securities totaled $19.3$31.6 billion at the end of 2019,2021, and averaged $19.5$28.4 billion as compared to the cash, cash equivalents and marketable securities total of $19.7$25.2 billion and $19.0$22.2 billion average cash balance in 2018.2020. The total debt balance at the end of 20192021 was $27.7$33.8 billion with an average debt balance of $29.1$34.5 billion as compared to $30.5$35.3 billion at the end of 20182020 and an average debt balance of $32.5$31.5 billion. The decrease in debt was due to the retirement of long-term debt.
Income Before Tax by Segment
Income (loss) before tax by segment of business were as follows:
  Income Before Tax Segment Sales Percent of Segment Sales
(Dollars in Millions) 2019 2018 2019 2018 2019 2018
Consumer $2,061
 2,320
 13,898
 13,853
 14.8% 16.7
Pharmaceutical 8,816
 12,568
 42,198
 40,734
 20.9
 30.9
Medical Devices 7,286
 4,397
 25,963
 26,994
 28.1
 16.3
Total (1)
 18,163
 19,285
 82,059
 81,581
 22.1
 23.6
Less: Net expense not allocated to segments (2)
 835
 1,286
      
  
Earnings before provision for taxes on income $17,328
 17,999
 82,059
 81,581
 21.1% 22.1

(1)
See Note 18 to the Consolidated Financial Statements for more details.
(2)
Amounts not allocated to segments include interest (income) expense and general corporate (income) expense.


25



 Income Before TaxSegment SalesPercent of Segment Sales
(Dollars in Millions)202120202021202020212020
Consumer Health$1,294 (1,064)14,635 14,053 8.8 %(7.6)
Pharmaceutical18,181 15,462 52,080 45,572 34.9 33.9 
Medical Devices4,373 3,044 27,060 22,959 16.2 13.3 
Total (1)
23,848 17,442 93,775 82,584 25.4 21.1 
Less: Net expense not allocated to segments (2)
1,072 945   
Earnings before provision for taxes on income$22,776 16,497 93,775 82,584 24.3 %20.0 

(1)See Note 17 to the Consolidated Financial Statements for more details.
(2)Amounts not allocated to segments include interest (income) expense and general corporate (income) expense.
Consumer Health Segment:
In 2019,2021, the Consumer Health segment income before tax as a percent toof sales was 14.8%,8.8% versus 16.7%a loss before tax of 7.6% in 2018.2020. The decreaseincrease in the income before tax as a percent of sales in 2019 as compared to 2018 was primarily attributable to higherdriven by the following:
2021 litigation expense includes $1.6 billion of talc expenses; 2020 includes $3.9 billion of talc expenses for litigation of $0.1 billion, intangible asset amortization of $0.1 billion and restructuring of $0.1 billion in the fiscal year 2019 as compared to the fiscal year 2018. This was
Supply chain efficiencies
partially offset by planned prioritization andby:
Increased brand marketing expense reductions. The fiscal year 2019 included a gain of $0.3 billion related to the Company's previously held equity investment in DR. CI:LABO. Divestiture gains for the fiscal year of 2018 included a gain of $0.3 billion from the divestiture of NIZORAL®.expenses and commodity inflation

Pharmaceutical Segment:
In 2019,2021, the Pharmaceutical segment income before tax as a percent to sales was 20.9%34.9% versus 30.9%33.9% in 2018.2020. The decreaseincrease in the income before tax as a percent of sales was primarily duedriven by the following:
Divestiture gains of $0.6 billion related to highertwo pharmaceutical brands outside the U.S. in fiscal 2021
2021 litigation expense of $4.3includes $0.6 billion primarily duerelated to Risperdal; 2020 includes $0.8 billion primarily related to the agreement in principle to settle opioid litigation of $4.0 billion, increased spending in research and development, including a $0.3 billion upfront payment to argenx. This was settlement
partially offset by $0.8 billionby:
Research & Development investment in the COVID-19 vaccine net of higher unrealized gains on securities, a lower in-process researchgovernmental reimbursements and development charge of $0.2 billion, and lower Actelion acquisition and integration related costs as compared to the fiscal year 2018. In addition, the fiscal year 2018 included a contingent liability reversal of $0.2 billion and higher divestiture gains of $0.2 billion.general portfolio progression
30


Medical Devices Segment: In 2019,2021, the Medical Devices segment income before tax as a percent to sales was 28.1%16.2% versus 16.3%13.3% in 2018.2020. The increase in the income before tax as a percent to sales was primarily attributable to higher divestiture gains in 2019. Divestiture gains indriven by the fiscal 2019 included a gainfollowing:
Recovery of $2.0 billionprior year COVID-19 production related toslow downs and related inventory impacts
Overall expense leveraging resulting from the ASP business. Divestiture gains for the fiscal year of 2018 included a gain of $0.5 billion related to LifeScan. Additionally, the fiscal year 2019 included lower litigation expense of $1.3 billion, lower restructuring charges of $0.2 billion and lower intangible asset amortizationMedical Devices sales recovery
Litigation expense of $0.1 billion as comparedin 2021 vs. $0.3 billion in 2020
partially offset by:
A contingent consideration reversal of approximately $1.1 billion in the fiscal 2020 related to the fiscal year 2018. This was partially offset by increased investmenttiming of certain developmental milestones associated with the Auris Health acquisition
A higher IPR&D charge of $0.7 billion ($0.9 billion in 2021 related to the general surgery offering in digital robotics and digital solutions.(Ottava) acquired with the Auris Health acquisition in 2019)

Restructuring: In the fiscal second quarter of 2018, the Company announced plans to implement actions across its global supply chainGlobal Supply Chain that are intended to enable the Company to focus resources and increase investments in critical capabilities, technologies and solutions necessary to manufacture and supply its product portfolio of the future, enhance agility and drive growth. The Company expects these supply chain actions will include expanding its use of strategic collaborations, and bolstering its initiatives to reduce complexity, improving cost-competitiveness, enhancing capabilities and optimizing its network.  Discussions regarding specific future actions are ongoing and are subject to all relevant consultation requirements before they are finalized. In total, the Company expects these actions to generate approximately $0.6 to $0.8 billion in annual pre-tax cost savings that will be substantially delivered by the end of 2022. The Company expects to record pre-tax restructuring charges of approximately $1.9$2.1 to $2.3 billion. The Company estimates that approximately 70% of the cumulative pre-tax costs will result in cash outlays. In 2019,2021, the Company recorded a pre-tax charge of $0.6$0.5 billion, which is included on the following lines of the Consolidated Statement of Earnings, $0.3 billion in restructuring, $0.2$0.1 billion in other (income) expense and $0.1 billion in cost of products sold. Total project costs of approximately $0.8$1.8 billion have been recorded since the restructuring was announced. The program is set to be completed at the end of 2022.

See Note 2220 to the Consolidated Financial Statements for additional details related to the restructuring programs.

Provision for Taxes on Income: The worldwide effective income tax rate was 12.7%8.3% in 20192021 and 15.0%10.8% in 2018.2020.

For discussion related to the fiscal 20192021 provision for taxes refer to Note 8 to the Consolidated Financial Statements.

On September 28, 2018 the Swiss Parliament approved the Federal Act on Tax Reform and AHV Financing (TRAF). On May 19, 2019 a public referendum was held in Switzerland that approved the federal reform proposals. In the fiscal third quarter of 2019, the Swiss Federal Council enacted TRAF which became effective on January 1, 2020. On February 9, 2020 a public referendum on the legislative change was held in the last remaining canton where the Company has significant operations. The legislation was approved by the voters and formal enactment is expected in the fiscal first half of 2020. The Company has not yet elected the transitional provision in this canton. However, the net financial benefit is estimated to be between $0.2 billion and $0.5 billion in the fiscal first half of 2020. The Company does not believe that TRAF will have a material impact to the Company’s ongoing consolidated effective tax rate beginning in fiscal year 2020.






26







Liquidity and Capital Resources
Liquidity & Cash Flows
Cash and cash equivalents were $17.3$14.5 billion at the end of 20192021 as compared to $18.1$14.0 billion at the end of 2018. 2020.
The primary sources and uses of cash that contributed to the $0.8$0.5 billion decrease were approximately $23.4 billion of cash generated from operating activities. This was offset by $6.2 billion net cash used by investing activities and $18.0 billion net cash used by financing activities. increase were:
(Dollars In Billions)
$14.0 Q4 2020 Cash and cash equivalents balance
23.4 cash generated from operating activities
(8.7)net cash used by investing activities
(14.0)net cash used by financing activities
(0.2)effect of exchange rate and rounding
$14.5 Q4 2021 Cash and cash equivalents balance

In addition, the Company had $2.0$17.1 billion in marketable securities at the end of 2019fiscal year 2021 and $1.6$11.2 billion at the end of 2018.fiscal year 2020. See Note 1 to the Consolidated Financial Statements for additional details on cash, cash equivalents and marketable securities.






31


Cash flow from operations of $23.4 billion was the result of $15.1 billion of net earnings and $9.1 billion of non-cash expenses and other adjustments for depreciation and amortization, stock-based compensation, assets write-downs (primarily related to the Alios IPR&D asset), and favorable increases in accounts payable, accrued liabilities and other liabilities of $5.5 billion. This was reduced by $1.6 billion related to an increase in accounts receivable, inventories, other current and non-current assets. as well as non-cash expenses and other adjustments of $2.5 billion for the increase in the deferred tax provision and a net gain on sale of assets/businesses of $2.2 billion (primarily related to the ASP divestiture).of:
(Dollars In Billions)
$20.9 Net Earnings
6.8 non-cash expenses and other adjustments primarily for depreciation and amortization, stock-based compensation and asset write-downs partially offset by the deferred tax provision, net gain on sale of assets/businesses and credit losses and accounts receivable allowances
(1.1)a decrease in current and non-current liabilities
2.4 an increase in accounts payable and accrued liabilities
(5.6)an increase in accounts receivable, inventories and other current and non-current assets
$23.4 Cash Flow from operations

Investing activities use of $6.2$8.7 billion of cash was primarily used for acquisitions of $5.8 billion primarily related to the acquisitions of Auris Health, Inc. and DR. CI:LABO, additions to property, plant and equipment of $3.5 billion and $0.5 billion from the net purchases of investments. Investing activities also included a source of $3.3 billion of proceeds from the disposal of assets/businesses, primarily the ASP divestiture, and proceeds from credit support agreements of $0.3 billion.for:
(Dollars In Billions)
$(3.7)additions to property, plant and equipment
(5.4)net purchases of investments
0.7 proceeds from the disposal of assets/businesses, net
0.2 Credit support agreements activity, net
(0.1) acquisitions
(0.4)other (primarily licenses and milestones) and rounding
$(8.7)Net cash used for investing activities

Financing activities use of $18.0$14.0 billion of cash was primarily used for dividends to shareholders of $9.9 billion, the repurchase of common stock of $6.7 billion and the net retirement of short and long term debt of $2.9 billion. Financing activities also included sources of $1.5 billion from proceeds of stock options exercised/employee withholding tax on stock awards, and other financing activities.for:
(Dollars In Billions)
$(11.0)dividends to shareholders
(3.5)repurchase of common stock for employee share programs
(1.0)net repayment from short and long term debt
1.0 proceeds from stock options exercised/employee withholding tax on stock awards, net
0.3 Credit support agreements activity, net
0.2 other and rounding
$(14.0)Net cash used for financing activities
On December 17, 2018, the Company announced that its Board of Directors approved a share repurchase program, authorizing the Company to purchase up to $5.0 billion of the Company's shares of common stock. Shares acquired are available for general corporate purposes. The Company financed the share repurchase program through available cash.
As of September 29, 2019, $5.0 billion was repurchased under the program and the program was completed.
As of December 29, 2019,January 2, 2022, the Company's notes payable and long-term debt was in excess of cash, cash equivalents and marketable securities. As of December 29, 2019,January 2, 2022, the net debt position was $8.4$2.1 billion as compared to the prior year of $10.8$10.1 billion. There was a decrease in the net debt position due to retirementrepayment of debt.debt and an increase in cash, cash equivalents, and marketable securities generating from operations. The debt balance at the end of 20192021 was $27.7$33.8 billion as compared to $30.5$35.3 billion in 2018. In 2019,2020. Considering recent market conditions and the Company continued to have access to liquidity through the commercial paper market. Additionally, as a result of the TCJA,on-going COVID-19 crisis, the Company has access toevaluated its operating cash outside the U.S. at a significantly reduced cost.flows and liquidity profile and does not foresee any significant incremental risk. The Company anticipates that operating cash flows, the ability to raise funds from external sources, borrowing capacity from existing committed credit facilities and access to the commercial paper markets will continue to provide sufficient resources to fund operating needs, including the agreementCompany's approximate $1.1 billion in principle to settlecontractual supply commitments associated with its development of the COVID-19 vaccine, the opioid litigation to be potentially paid oversettlement for $5.0 billion and the next two to three years. As discussed inestablishment of the $2.0 billion trust for talc related liabilities (See Note 819 to the Consolidated Financial Statements the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) has completed its audit for the tax years through 2009 and is currently auditing the tax years 2010-2012. The Company currently expects completion of this audit and settlement of the related tax liabilities in the fiscal year 2020. As of December 29, 2019, the Company has classified unrecognized tax benefits and related interest of approximately $0.9 billion as a current liability in the “Accrued taxes on Income” line in the Consolidated Balance Sheet. This is the amount expected to be paid over the next 12 months with respect to the IRS audit. Subsequent to December 29, 2019, the Company made a payment for approximately $0.6 billion to the U.S. Treasury related to the estimated 2010-2012 tax audit liability in anticipation of the final settlement later in fiscal 2020. The completion of this tax audit may result in additional adjustments todetails). In addition, the Company’s unrecognized tax benefit liability that may have a material impact on the Company’s future operating results or cash flows in the period that the audit is substantially completed.
The Company monitors the global capital markets on an ongoing basis and from time to time may raise capital when market conditions are favorable. Effective beginning in fiscal 2022, the U.S. Tax Cuts and Job Act of 2017 currently requires the Company to deduct U.S. and international research and development expenditures for tax purposes over 5 to 15 years, instead of in the current fiscal year. As a result, the Company is expecting an increase in annual cash tax payments to the U.S Treasury of an incremental $1.0 to 1.5 billion beginning in fiscal 2022. The Company filedwill concurrently record a shelf registration on February 27, 2017, which will enable itdeferred tax benefit for the future amortization of the research and development (R&D) for tax purposes and therefore, the Company is not expecting a significant impact to issue debt securities onits effective tax rate related to this change. The requirement to expense R&D as incurred is unchanged for U.S. GAAP purposes and the impact to pre-tax R&D expense is not affected by this provision.Additionally, as a timely basisresult of the Tax Cuts and will be updatedJobs Act (TCJA), the Company has access to its cash outside the U.S. at a significantly reduced cost. During the fiscal third quarter of
32


2021, in accordance with the terms of the agreement associated with the acquisition of Actelion, the Company's undrawn credit facility with Idorsia was terminated.

The following table summarizes the Company’s material contractual obligations and their aggregate maturities as required. of January 2, 2022: To satisfy these obligations, the Company intends to use cash from operations.
(Dollars in Millions)Tax Legislation (TCJA)Debt ObligationsInterest on
Debt Obligations
Total
2022$812 2,131 909 3,852 
20231,522 1,551 893 3,966 
20242,029 1,518 843 4,390 
20252,536 1,732 789 5,057 
2026— 1,995 744 2,739 
After 2026— 23,189 8,786 31,975 
Total$6,899 32,116 12,964 51,979 

For additional details on borrowings,tax matters, see Note 78 to the Consolidated Financial Statements. The table does not include activity related to business combinations or the Company’s approximate $1.1 billion in contractual supply commitments associated with its development of a COVID-19 vaccine.

Financing and Market Risk
The Company uses financial instruments to manage the impact of foreign exchange rate changes on cash flows. Accordingly, the Company enters into forward foreign exchange contracts to protect the value of certain foreign currency assets and liabilities and to hedge future foreign currency transactions primarily related to product costs. Gains or losses on these contracts are offset by the gains or losses on the underlying transactions. A 10% appreciation of the U.S. Dollar from the December 29, 2019January 2, 2022 market rates would increase the unrealized value of the Company’s forward contracts by $271 million.$0.1 billion. Conversely, a

27



10% depreciation of the U.S. Dollar from the December 29, 2019January 2, 2022 market rates would decrease the unrealized value of the Company’s forward contracts by $331 million.$0.1 billion. In either scenario, the gain or loss on the forward contract would be offset by the gain or loss on the underlying transaction, and therefore, would have no impact on future anticipated earnings and cash flows.
The Company hedges the exposure to fluctuations in currency exchange rates, and the effect on certain assets and liabilities in foreign currency, by entering into currency swap contracts. A 1% change in the spread between U.S. and foreign interest rates on the Company’s interest rate sensitive financial instruments would either increase or decrease the unrealized value of the Company’s swap contracts by approximately $1,043 million.$2.2 billion. In either scenario, at maturity, the gain or loss on the swap contract would be offset by the gain or loss on the underlying transaction, and therefore, would have no impact on future anticipated cash flows.
The Company does not enter into financial instruments for trading or speculative purposes. Further, the Company has a policy of only entering into contracts with parties that have at least an investment grade credit rating. The counter-partiescounterparties to these contracts are major financial institutions and there is no significant concentration of exposure with any one counter-party.counterparty. Management believes the risk of loss is remote. During the fiscal second quarter of 2017, theThe Company entered into credit support agreements (CSA) with certain derivative counterparties establishing collateral thresholds based on respective credit ratings and netting agreements. See Note 6 to the Consolidated Financial Statements for additional details on credit support agreements.
The Company invests in both fixed rate and floating rate interest earning securities which carry a degree of interest rate risk. The fair market value of fixed rate securities may be adversely impacted due to a rise in interest rates, while floating rate securities may produce less income than predicted if interest rates fall. A 1% (100 basis points) change in spread on the Company’s interest rate sensitive investments would either increase or decrease the unrealized value of cash equivalents and current marketable securities by approximately $7 million.$0.1 billion.
The Company has access to substantial sources of funds at numerous banks worldwide. In September 2019,2021, the Company secured a new 364-day Credit Facility. Total credit available to the Company approximates $10 billion, which expires on September 10, 2020.8, 2022. Interest charged on borrowings under the credit line agreement is based on either bids provided by banks, the prime rate, London Interbank Offered Rates (LIBOR),Secured Overnight Financing Rate (SOFR) Reference Rate or other applicable market rate as allowed under the terms of the agreement, plus applicable margins. Commitment fees under the agreement are not material.
Total borrowings at the end of 20192021 and 20182020 were $27.7$33.8 billion and $30.5$35.3 billion, respectively. The decrease in borrowings was due to the retirementrepayment of debt in 2019.debt. In 2019,2021, net debt (cash and current marketable securities, net of debt) was $8.4$2.1 billion compared to net debt of $10.8$10.1 billion in 2018.2020. Total debt represented 31.8%31.3% of total capital (shareholders’ equity and total debt) in 20192021 and 33.8%35.8% of total capital in 2018.2020. Shareholders’ equity per share at the end of 20192021 was $22.59$28.16 compared to $22.44$24.04 at year-end 2018.2020.
A summary of borrowings can be found in Note 7 to the Consolidated Financial Statements.
Contractual Obligations and Commitments
The Company’s contractual obligations are primarily for the recently enacted tax legislation, leases, debt and unfunded retirement plans. There are no other significant obligations. To satisfy these obligations, the Company will use cash from operations. The following table summarizes the Company’s contractual obligations and their aggregate maturities as of December 29, 2019 (see Notes 7, 8, 10 and 16 to the Consolidated Financial Statements for further details):

(Dollars in Millions) Tax Legislation (TCJA) Debt Obligations Interest on
Debt Obligations
 Unfunded
Retirement Plans
 Leases Total
2020 $528
 1,100
 886
 103
 215
 2,832
2021 812
 1,797
 841
 107
 254
 3,811
2022 812
 2,106
 796
 113
 197
 4,024
2023 1,522
 1,552
 764
 118
 141
 4,097
2024 2,029
 1,474
 729
 127
 86
 4,445
After 2024 2,536
 19,565
 8,121
 749
 201
 31,172
Total $8,239
 27,594
 12,137
 1,317
 1,094
 50,381

For tax matters, see Note 8 to the Consolidated Financial Statements. For other retirement plan and post-employment medical benefit information, see Note 10 to the Consolidated Financial Statements. The table does not include activity related to business combinations.


2833



Dividends
The Company increased its dividend in 20192021 for the 57th59th consecutive year. Cash dividends paid were $3.75$4.19 per share in 20192021 and $3.54$3.98 per share in 2018.2020.

On January 4, 2022, the Board of Directors declared a regular cash dividend of $1.06 per share, payable on March 8, 2022 to shareholders of record as of February 22, 2022.
Other Information
Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates
Management’s discussion and analysis of results of operations and financial condition are based on the Company’s consolidated financial statements that have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the U.S. (GAAP). The preparation of these financial statements requires that management make estimates and assumptions that affect the amounts reported for revenues, expenses, assets, liabilities and other related disclosures. Actual results may or may not differ from these estimates. The Company believes that the understanding of certain key accounting policies and estimates are essential in achieving more insight into the Company’s operating results and financial condition. These key accounting policies include revenue recognition, income taxes, legal and self-insurance contingencies, valuation of long-lived assets, assumptions used to determine the amounts recorded for pensions and other employee benefit plans and accounting for stock based awards.
The extent to which COVID-19 impacts the Company’s business and financial results will depend on numerous evolving factors including, but not limited to, the magnitude and duration of COVID-19, the extent to which it will impact worldwide macroeconomic conditions including interest rates, employment rates and health insurance coverage, the speed of the anticipated recovery, and governmental and business reactions to the pandemic. The Company assessed certain accounting matters that generally require consideration of forecasted financial information in context with the information reasonably available to the Company and the unknown future impacts of COVID-19 as of January 2, 2022 and through the date of this report. The accounting matters assessed included, but were not limited to, the Company’s allowance for doubtful accounts and credit losses, inventory and related reserves, accrued rebates and associated reserves, and the carrying value of the goodwill and other long-lived assets. While there was not a material impact to the Company’s consolidated financial statements as of and for the year ended January 2, 2022, the Company’s future assessment of the magnitude and duration of COVID-19, as well as other factors, could result in material impacts to the Company’s consolidated financial statements in future reporting periods.

Revenue Recognition: The Company recognizes revenue from product sales when obligations under the terms of a contract with the customer are satisfied; generally, this occurs with the transfer of control of the goods to customers. The Company's global payment terms are typically between 30 to 90 days. Provisions for certain rebates, sales incentives, trade promotions, coupons, product returns, and discounts to customers and governmental clawback provisions are accounted for as variable consideration and recorded as a reduction in sales. See Note 1 to the Consolidated Financial Statements for the Accounting Standards Update related to revenue which was adopted in 2018.
Product discounts granted are based on the terms of arrangements with direct, indirect and other market participants, as well as market conditions, including consideration of competitor pricing. Rebates are estimated based on contractual terms, historical experience, patient outcomes, trend analysis and projected market conditions in the various markets served. The Company evaluates market conditions for products or groups of products primarily through the analysis of wholesaler and other third-party sell-through and market research data, as well as internally generated information.
Sales returns are estimated and recorded based on historical sales and returns information. Products that exhibit unusual sales or return patterns due to dating, competition or other marketing matters are specifically investigated and analyzed as part of the accounting for sales return accruals.
Sales returns allowances represent a reserve for products that may be returned due to expiration, destruction in the field, or in specific areas, product recall. The sales returns reserve is based on historical return trends by product and by market as a percent to gross sales. In accordance with the Company’s accounting policies, the Company generally issues credit to customers for returned goods. The Company’s sales returns reserves are accounted for in accordance with the U.S. GAAP guidance for revenue recognition when right of return exists. Sales returns reserves are recorded at full sales value. Sales returns in the Consumer Health and Pharmaceutical segments are almost exclusively not resalable. Sales returns for certain franchises in the Medical Devices segment are typically resalable but are not material. The Company infrequently exchanges products from inventory for returned products. The sales returns reserve for the total Company has been approximately 1.0% of annual net trade sales during the fiscal reporting years 20192021 and 2018.2020.
Promotional programs, such as product listing allowances and cooperative advertising arrangements, are recorded in the same period as related sales. Continuing promotional programs include coupons and volume-based sales incentive programs. The redemption cost of consumer coupons is based on historical redemption experience by product and value. Volume-based incentive programs are based on the estimated sales volumes for the incentive period and are recorded as products are sold. These arrangements are evaluated to determine the appropriate amounts to be deferred or recorded as a reduction of revenue. The Company also earns profit-share payments through collaborative arrangements of certain products, which are included in
34


sales to customers. For all years presented, profit-share payments were approximately 2.0%less than 3.0% of the total revenues and are included in sales to customers.
In addition, the Company enters into collaboration arrangements that contain multiple revenue generating activities. Amounts due from collaborative partners for these arrangements are recognized as each activity is performed or delivered, based on the relative selling price. Upfront fees received as part of these arrangements are deferred and recognized over the performance period. See Note 1 to the Consolidated Financial Statements for additional disclosures on collaborations.
Reasonably likely changes to assumptions used to calculate the accruals for rebates, returns and promotions are not anticipated to have a material effect on the financial statements. The Company currently discloses the impact of changes to assumptions in the quarterly or annual filing in which there is a material financial statement impact.




29





Below are tables that show the progression of accrued rebates, returns, promotions, reserve for doubtful accounts and reserve for cash discounts by segment of business for the fiscal years ended December 29, 2019January 2, 2022 and December 30, 2018.January 3, 2021.

Consumer Health Segment
(Dollars in Millions)Balance at
Beginning of Period
AccrualsPayments/CreditsBalance at
End of Period
2021    
Accrued rebates (1)
$289 893 (895)287 
Accrued returns76 136 (136)76 
Accrued promotions428 1,958 (1,999)387 
Subtotal$793 2,987 (3,030)750 
Reserve for doubtful accounts39 (7)32 
Reserve for cash discounts12 213 (210)15 
Total$844 3,200 (3,247)797 
2020    
Accrued rebates(1)
$284 793 (788)289 
Accrued returns63 138 (125)76 
Accrued promotions487 1,988 (2,047)428 
Subtotal$834 2,919 (2,960)793 
Reserve for doubtful accounts35 (3)39 
Reserve for cash discounts17 201 (206)12 
Total$886 3,127 (3,169)844 
(Dollars in Millions) Balance at
Beginning of Period
 Accruals Payments/Credits Balance at
End of Period
2019  
  
  
  
Accrued rebates (1)
 $271
 841
 (828) 284
Accrued returns 57
 128
 (122) 63
Accrued promotions 497
 2,119
 (2,129) 487
Subtotal $825
 3,088
 (3,079) 834
Reserve for doubtful accounts 32
 21
 (18) 35
Reserve for cash discounts 23
 198
 (204) 17
Total $880
 3,307
 (3,301) 886
         
2018  
  
  
  
Accrued rebates(1)
 $186
 836
 (751) 271
Accrued returns 68
 98
 (109) 57
Accrued promotions 481
 2,233
 (2,217) 497
Subtotal $735
 3,167
 (3,077) 825
Reserve for doubtful accounts 31
 10
 (9) 32
Reserve for cash discounts 23
 204
 (204) 23
Total $789
 3,381
 (3,290) 880
(1)Includes reserve for customer rebates of $80 million at January 2, 2022 and $66 million at January 3, 2021, recorded as a contra asset.






(1)
Includes reserve for customer rebates of $54 million at December 29, 2019 and $57 million at December 30, 2018, recorded as a contra asset.
Pharmaceutical Segment
(Dollars in Millions) Balance at
Beginning of Period
 Accruals 
Payments/Credits(2)
 Balance at
End of Period
2019  
  
  
  
Accrued rebates (1)
 $7,510
 26,868
 (25,365) 9,013
Accrued returns 436
 354
 (290) 500
Accrued promotions 13
 17
 (25) 5
Subtotal $7,959
 27,239
 (25,680) 9,518
Reserve for doubtful accounts 47
 2
 (13) 36
Reserve for cash discounts 53
 936
 (924) 65
Total $8,059
 28,177
 (26,617) 9,619
         
2018  
  
  
  
Accrued rebates (1)
 $4,862
 22,644
 (19,996) 7,510
Accrued returns 362
 385
 (311) 436
Accrued promotions 35
 46
 (68) 13
Subtotal $5,259
 23,075
 (20,375) 7,959
Reserve for doubtful accounts 77
 37
 (67) 47
Reserve for cash discounts 55
 860
 (862) 53
Total $5,391
 23,972
 (21,304) 8,059
(1)
Includes reserve for customer rebates of $93 million at December 29, 2019 and $89 million at December 30, 2018, recorded as a contra asset.

3035


Pharmaceutical Segment
(Dollars in Millions)Balance at
Beginning of Period
Accruals
Payments/Credits(2)
Balance at
End of Period
2021    
Accrued rebates (1)
$9,837 37,922 (37,428)10,331 
Accrued returns460 345 (285)520 
Accrued promotions13 (16)
Subtotal10,303 38,280 (37,729)10,854 
Reserve for doubtful accounts52 18 (20)50 
Reserve for cash discounts70 1,163 (1,139)94 
Total10,425 39,461 (38,888)10,998 
2020    
Accrued rebates (1)
$9,013 32,415 (31,591)9,837 
Accrued returns500 233 (273)460 
Accrued promotions10 (9)
Subtotal$9,518 32,658 (31,873)10,303 
Reserve for doubtful accounts36 24 (8)52 
Reserve for cash discounts65 1,034 (1,029)70 
Total$9,619 33,716 (32,910)10,425 
(1)Includes reserve for customer rebates of $218 million at January 2, 2022 and $174 million at January 3, 2021, recorded as a contra asset.
(2)Includes prior period adjustments
Medical Devices Segment
(Dollars in Millions)Balance at
Beginning of Period
AccrualsPayments/CreditsBalance at
End of Period
2021    
Accrued rebates(1)
$1,174 5,942 (5,670)1,446 
Accrued returns138 559 (563)134 
Accrued promotions52 140 (138)54 
Subtotal1,364 6,641 (6,371)1,634 
Reserve for doubtful accounts202 12 (66)148 
Reserve for cash discounts96 (95)10 
Total1,575 6,749 (6,532)1,792 
2020    
Accrued rebates(1)
$1,013 5,144 (4,983)1,174 
Accrued returns118 578 (558)138 
Accrued promotions46 118 (112)52 
Subtotal$1,177 5,840 (5,653)1,364 
Reserve for doubtful accounts155 95 (48)202 
Reserve for cash discounts10 88 (89)
Total$1,342 6,023 (5,790)1,575 
(1)Includes reserve for customer rebates of $845 million at January 2, 2022 and $707 million at January 3, 2021, recorded as a contra asset.

(2)
Includes adjustments36

Medical Devices Segment

(Dollars in Millions) Balance at
Beginning of Period
 Accruals Payments/Credits Balance at
End of Period
2019  
  
  
  
Accrued rebates(1)
 $1,218
 5,487
 (5,692) 1,013
Accrued returns 114
 673
 (669) 118
Accrued promotions 42
 106
 (102) 46
Subtotal $1,374
 6,266
 (6,463) 1,177
Reserve for doubtful accounts 169
 30
 (44) 155
Reserve for cash discounts 
 106
 (96) 10
Total $1,543
 6,402
 (6,603) 1,342
         
2018(2)
  
  
  
  
Accrued rebates(1)
 $1,620
 6,344
 (6,746) 1,218
Accrued returns 152
 750
 (788) 114
Accrued promotions 83
 116
 (157) 42
Subtotal $1,855
 7,210
 (7,691) 1,374
Reserve for doubtful accounts 183
 29
 (43) 169
Reserve for cash discounts 15
 140
 (155) 
Total $2,053
 7,379
 (7,889) 1,543
(1)
Includes reserve for customer rebates of $499 million at December 29, 2019 and $632 million at December 30, 2018, recorded as a contra asset.
(2)
Certain prior period amounts have been reclassified to conform to current year presentation.

Income Taxes: Income taxes are recorded based on amounts refundable or payable for the current year and include the results of any difference between U.S. GAAP accounting and tax reporting, recorded as deferred tax assets or liabilities. The Company estimates deferred tax assets and liabilities based on enacted tax regulations and rates. Future changes in tax laws and rates may affect recorded deferred tax assets and liabilities.
The Company has unrecognized tax benefits for uncertain tax positions. The Company follows U.S. GAAP, which prescribes a recognition threshold and measurement attribute for the financial statement recognition and measurement of a tax position taken or expected to be taken in a tax return. Management believes that changes in these estimates would not have a material effect on the Company's results of operations, cash flows or financial position.
The Company has recorded deferred tax liabilities on all undistributed earnings prior to December 31, 2017 from its international subsidiaries. The Company has not provided deferred taxes on the undistributed earnings subsequent to January 1, 2018 from certain international subsidiaries where the earnings are considered to be indefinitely reinvested. The Company intends to continue to reinvest these earnings in those international operations. If the Company decides at a later date to repatriate these earnings to the U.S., the Company would be required to provide for the net tax effects on these amounts. The Company estimates that the total tax effect of this repatriation would be approximately $0.8$0.7 billion under currentcurrently enacted tax laws and regulations and at current currency exchange rates. This amount does not include the possible benefit of U.S. foreign tax credits, which may substantially offset this cost.
See Note 1 and Note 8 to the Consolidated Financial Statements for further information regarding income taxes.
Legal and Self Insurance Contingencies: The Company records accruals for various contingencies, including legal proceedings and product liability claims as these arise in the normal course of business. The accruals are based on management’s judgment as to the probability of losses and, where applicable, actuarially determined estimates. The Company has self insurance through a wholly-owned captive insurance company. In addition to accruals in the self insurance program, claims that exceed the insurance coverage are accrued when losses are probable and amounts can be reasonably estimated.
The Company follows the provisions of U.S. GAAP when recording litigation related contingencies. A liability is recorded when a loss is probable and can be reasonably estimated. The best estimate of a loss within a range is accrued; however, if no estimate in the range is better than any other, the minimum amount is accrued.

31



See Notes 1 and 2119 to the Consolidated Financial Statements for further information regarding product liability and legal proceedings.
Long-Lived and Intangible Assets: The Company assesses changes, both qualitatively and quantitatively, in economic conditions and makes assumptions regarding estimated future cash flows in evaluating the value of the Company’s property, plant and equipment, goodwill and intangible assets. As these assumptions and estimates may change over time, it may or may not be necessary for the Company to record impairment charges.
Employee Benefit Plans: The Company sponsors various retirement and pension plans, including defined benefit, defined contribution and termination indemnity plans, which cover most employees worldwide. These plans are based on assumptions for the discount rate, expected return on plan assets, mortality rates, expected salary increases, health carehealthcare cost trend rates and attrition rates. See Note 10 to the Consolidated Financial Statements for further details on these rates and the effect a rate change to the health care cost trend would have on the Company’s results of operations.rates.
Stock Based Compensation: The Company recognizes compensation expense associated with the issuance of equity instruments to employees for their services. Based on the type of equity instrument, the fair value is estimated on the date of grant using either the Black-Scholes option valuation model or a combination of both the Black-Scholes option valuation model and Monte Carlo valuation model, and is expensed in the financial statements over the service period. The input assumptions used in determining fair value are the expected life, expected volatility, risk-free rate and expected dividend yield. ForPrior to fiscal 2020, for performance share units, the fair market value iswas calculated for each of the three component goals at the date of grant.grant: operational sales, adjusted operational earnings per share and relative total shareholder return. Beginning in fiscal 2020, for performance share units, the fair market value is calculated for the two component goals at the date of grant: adjusted operational earnings per share and relative total shareholder return.  The fair values for the sales and earnings per share goalsgoal of each performance share unit werewas estimated on the date of grant using the fair market value of the shares at the time of the award, discounted for dividends, which are not paid on the performance share units during the vesting period. The fair value for the relative total shareholder return goal of each performance share unit was estimated on the date of grant using the Monte Carlo valuation model. See Note 1716 to the Consolidated Financial Statements for additional information.
New Accounting Pronouncements
Refer to Note 1 to the Consolidated Financial Statements for recently adopted accounting pronouncements and recently issued accounting pronouncements not yet adopted as of January 2, 2022.

December 29, 2019
37

.
Economic and Market Factors
COVID-19 considerations and business continuity
The Company has considered various internal and external factors in assessing the potential impact of COVID-19 on its business and financial results based upon information available at this time, as follows:
Operating Model: The Company has a diversified business model across the healthcare industry with flexibility designed into its manufacturing, research and development clinical operations and commercial capabilities.
Supply Chain: The Company continues to leverage its global manufacturing footprint and dual-source capabilities while closely monitoring and maintaining critical inventory at major distribution centers away from high-risk areas to help ensure adequate and effective distribution.
Business Continuity: The robust, active business continuity plans across the Company's network have been instrumental in preparing the Company for events like COVID-19 and the ability to meet the majority of patient and consumer needs remains uninterrupted.
Workforce: The Company has put procedures in place to protect its essential workforce in manufacturing, distribution, commercial and research operations while ensuring appropriate remote working protocols have been established for other employees.
Liquidity: The Company's high-quality credit rating allows the Company superior access to the financial capital markets for the foreseeable future.
Domestic and Foreign Legislation: The Company will continue to assess and evaluate the on-going global legislative efforts to combat the COVID-19 impact on economies and the sectors in which it participates. Currently, the recent legislative acts put in place are not expected to have a material impact on the Company’s operations.
In fiscal 2020 and 2021, the Company entered into a series of contract manufacturing arrangements for vaccine production with third party contract manufacturing organizations. These arrangements provide the Company with future supplemental commercial capacity for vaccine production and potentially transferable rights to such production if capacity is not required. Amounts paid for services to be deliveredand contractually obligated to be paid to these contract manufacturing organizations of approximately $1.1 billion are reflected in the prepaid expenses and other, other assets, accrued liabilities and other liabilities accounts in the Company's consolidated balance sheet upon execution of each agreement. Additionally, the Company has entered into certain vaccine development cost sharing arrangements with government related organizations.
The Company continues to evaluate and monitor both its internal and external supply arrangements, including its contract with Emergent BioSolutions and related production activities at its Bayview, Maryland facility. The Company has established a global vaccine supply network, where, in addition to its internal manufacturing site in Leiden, the Netherlands, ten other manufacturing sites will be involved in the production of vaccine across different countries and continents. The Company does not believe that a disruption at a vaccine manufacturing site, or the resulting delay would have a material financial impact on the Company’s consolidated financial statements or results.
The Company is aware that its products are used in an environment where, for more than a decade, policymakers, consumers and businesses have expressed concerns about the rising cost of health care.healthcare. In response to these concerns, the Company has a long-standing policy of pricing products responsibly. For the period 20092011 - 2019,2021, in the U.S., the weighted average compound annual growth rate of the Company’s net price increases for health carehealthcare products (prescription and over-the-counter drugs, hospital and professional products) was below the U.S. Consumer Price Index (CPI).
The Company operates in certain countries where the economic conditions continue to present significant challenges. The Company continues to monitor these situations and take appropriate actions. Inflation rates continue to have an effect on worldwide economies and, consequently, on the way companies operate. The Company has accounted for operations in Argentina (beginning in the fiscal third quarter of 2018) and Venezuela as highly inflationary, as the prior three-year cumulative inflation rate surpassed 100%. This did not have a material impact to the Company's results in the period. In the face of increasing costs, the Company strives to maintain its profit margins through cost reduction programs, productivity improvements and periodic price increases.
In June 2016, the United Kingdom (U.K.) held a referendum in which voters approved an exit from the European Union (E.U.), commonly referred to as “Brexit” and on January 31, 2020, the U.K. formally exited the E.U. Given the lack of comparable precedent, it is unclear what the ultimate financial, trade, regulatory and legal implications the withdrawal of the U.K. from the E.U. will have. Brexit creates global political and economic uncertainty, which may cause, among other consequences, volatility in exchange rates and interest rates, additional cost containment by third-party payors and changes in regulations.  However, the Company currently does not believe that these and other related effects will have a material impact on the Company’s consolidated financial position or operating results. As of December 29, 2019, the business of the Company’s U.K. subsidiaries represented less than 3% of both the Company’s consolidated assets and fiscal twelve months revenues, respectively.
The Company is exposed to fluctuations in currency exchange rates. A 1% change in the value of the U.S. Dollar as compared to all foreign currencies in which the Company had sales, income or expense in 20192021 would have increased or decreased the translation of foreign sales by approximately $390 million$0.5 billion and net income by approximately $120 million.$0.2 billion.
Governments around the world consider various proposals to make changes to tax laws, which may include increasing or decreasing existing statutory tax rates. In connection with various government initiatives, companies are required to disclose more information to tax authorities on operations around the world, which may lead to greater audit scrutiny of profits earned in other countries. A change in statutory tax rate in any country would result in the revaluation of the Company’s deferred tax assets and liabilities related to that particular jurisdiction in the period in which the new tax law is enacted.  This change would result in an expense or benefit recorded to the Company’s Consolidated Statement of Earnings.  The Company closely monitors these proposals as they arise in the countries where it operates. Changes to the statutory tax rate

32



may occur at any time, and any related expense or benefit recorded may be material to the fiscal quarter and year in which the law change is enacted. For discussion on Federal Act on Tax Reform and AHV Financing (Swiss Tax Reform) see Provision for Taxes on Income in Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.

The Company faces various worldwide health carehealthcare changes that may continue to result in pricing pressures that include health carehealthcare cost containment and government legislation relating to sales, promotions and reimbursement of health carehealthcare products.
38


Changes in the behavior and spending patterns of purchasers of health carehealthcare products and services, including delaying medical procedures, rationing prescription medications, reducing the frequency of physician visits and foregoing health carehealthcare insurance coverage, as a result of the current global economic downturn, may continue to impact the Company’s businesses.
The Company also operates in an environment increasingly hostile to intellectual property rights. Firms have filed Abbreviated New Drug Applications or Biosimilar Biological Product Applications with the U.S. FDA or otherwise challenged the coverage and/or validity of the Company's patents, seeking to market generic or biosimilar forms of many of the Company’s key pharmaceutical products prior to expiration of the applicable patents covering those products. In the event the Company is not successful in defending the patent claims challenged in the resulting lawsuits, generic or biosimilar versions of the products at issue will be introduced to the market, resulting in the potential for substantial market share and revenue losses for those products, and which may result in a non-cash impairment charge in any associated intangible asset. There is also a risk that one or more competitors could launch a generic or biosimilar version of the product at issue following regulatory approval even though one or more valid patents are in place. For further information, see the discussion on “REMICADE® Related Cases” and “Litigation Against Filers of Abbreviated New Drug Applications” in Note 21 to the Consolidated Financial Statements.
Legal Proceedings
Johnson & Johnson and certain of its subsidiaries are involved in various lawsuits and claims regarding product liability, intellectual property, commercial, employment, indemnification and other matters; governmental investigations; and other legal proceedings that arise from time to time in the ordinary course of business.
The Company records accruals for loss contingencies associated with these legal matters when it is probable that a liability will be incurred and the amount of the loss can be reasonably estimated. As of December 29, 2019,January 2, 2022, the Company has determined that the liabilities associated with certain litigation matters are probable and can be reasonably estimated. The Company has accrued for these matters and will continue to monitor each related legal issue and adjust accruals as might be warranted based on new information and further developments in accordance with ASC 450-20-25. For these and other litigation and regulatory matters discussed below for which a loss is probable or reasonably possible, the Company is unable to estimate the possible loss or range of loss beyond the amounts already accrued. Amounts accrued for legal contingencies often result from a complex series of judgments about future events and uncertainties that rely heavily on estimates and assumptions including timing of related payments. The ability to make such estimates and judgments can be affected by various factors including, among other things, whether damages sought in the proceedings are unsubstantiated or indeterminate; scientific and legal discovery has not commenced or is not complete; proceedings are in early stages; matters present legal uncertainties; there are significant facts in dispute; procedural or jurisdictional issues; the uncertainty and unpredictability of the number of potential claims; ability to achieve comprehensive multi-party settlements; complexity of related cross-claims and counterclaims; and/or there are numerous parties involved. To the extent adverse awards, judgments or verdicts have been rendered against the Company, the Company does not record an accrual until a loss is determined to be probable and can be reasonably estimated.
In the Company's opinion, based on its examination of these matters, its experience to date and discussions with counsel, the ultimate outcome of legal proceedings, net of liabilities accrued in the Company's balance sheet, is not expected to have a material adverse effect on the Company's financial position. However, the resolution of, or increase in accruals for, one or more of these matters in any reporting period may have a material adverse effect on the Company's results of operations and cash flows for that period.
See Note 2119 to the Consolidated Financial Statements included in Item 8 of this report for further information regarding legal proceedings.
Common Stock
The Company’s Common Stock is listed on the New York Stock Exchange under the symbol JNJ. As of February 12, 2020,10, 2022, there were 135,953127,899 record holders of Common Stock of the Company.

Item 7A.QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK
Item 7A.QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK
The information called for by this item is incorporated herein by reference to “Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Results of Operations and Financial Condition - Liquidity and Capital Resources - Financing and Market Risk” of this Report; and Note 1 “Summary of Significant Accounting Policies - Financial Instruments” of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements included in Item 8 of this Report.


3339




Item 8.     FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA


3440




JOHNSON & JOHNSON AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
At December 29, 2019January 2, 2022 and December 30, 2018January 3, 2021
(Dollars in Millions Except Share and Per Share Amounts) (Note 1)
 2019 2018
Assets   
Current assets 
  
Cash and cash equivalents (Notes 1 and 2)$17,305
 18,107
Marketable securities (Notes 1 and 2)1,982
 1,580
Accounts receivable trade, less allowances for doubtful accounts $226 (2018, $248)14,481
 14,098
Inventories (Notes 1 and 3)9,020
 8,599
Prepaid expenses and other receivables2,392
 2,699
Assets held for sale (Note 20)94
 950
Total current assets45,274
 46,033
Property, plant and equipment, net (Notes 1 and 4)17,658
 17,035
Intangible assets, net (Notes 1 and 5)47,643
 47,611
Goodwill (Notes 1 and 5)33,639
 30,453
Deferred taxes on income (Note 8)7,819
 7,640
Other assets5,695
 4,182
Total assets$157,728
 152,954
Liabilities and Shareholders’ Equity 
  
Current liabilities 
  
Loans and notes payable (Note 7)$1,202
 2,796
Accounts payable8,544
 7,537
Accrued liabilities9,715
 7,601
Accrued rebates, returns and promotions10,883
 9,380
Accrued compensation and employee related obligations3,354
 3,098
Accrued taxes on income (Note 8)2,266
 818
Total current liabilities35,964
 31,230
Long-term debt (Note 7)26,494
 27,684
Deferred taxes on income (Note 8)5,958
 7,506
Employee related obligations (Notes 9 and 10)10,663
 9,951
Long-term taxes payable (Note 8)7,444
 8,242
Other liabilities11,734
 8,589
Total liabilities98,257
 93,202
Commitments and Contingencies (Note 21)   
Shareholders’ equity 
  
Preferred stock — without par value (authorized and unissued 2,000,000 shares)
 
Common stock — par value $1.00 per share (Note 12) (authorized 4,320,000,000 shares; issued 3,119,843,000 shares)3,120
 3,120
Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) (Note 13)(15,891) (15,222)
Retained earnings110,659
 106,216
 97,888
 94,114
Less: common stock held in treasury, at cost (Note 12) (487,336,000 shares and 457,519,000 shares)38,417
 34,362
Total shareholders’ equity59,471
 59,752
Total liabilities and shareholders’ equity$157,728
 152,954
20212020
Assets
Current assets  
Cash and cash equivalents (Notes 1 and 2)$14,487 13,985 
Marketable securities (Notes 1 and 2)17,121 11,200 
Accounts receivable trade, less allowances for doubtful accounts $230 (2020, $293)15,283 13,576 
Inventories (Notes 1 and 3)10,387 9,344 
Prepaid expenses and other receivables3,701 3,132 
Total current assets60,979 51,237 
Property, plant and equipment, net (Notes 1 and 4)18,962 18,766 
Intangible assets, net (Notes 1 and 5)46,392 53,402 
Goodwill (Notes 1 and 5)35,246 36,393 
Deferred taxes on income (Note 8)10,223 8,534 
Other assets10,216 6,562 
Total assets$182,018 174,894 
Liabilities and Shareholders’ Equity  
Current liabilities  
Loans and notes payable (Note 7)$3,766 2,631 
Accounts payable11,055 9,505 
Accrued liabilities13,612 13,968 
Accrued rebates, returns and promotions12,095 11,513 
Accrued compensation and employee related obligations3,586 3,484 
Accrued taxes on income (Note 8)1,112 1,392 
Total current liabilities45,226 42,493 
Long-term debt (Note 7)29,985 32,635 
Deferred taxes on income (Note 8)7,487 7,214 
Employee related obligations (Notes 9 and 10)8,898 10,771 
Long-term taxes payable (Note 1)5,713 6,559 
Other liabilities10,686 11,944 
Total liabilities107,995 111,616 
Commitments and Contingencies (Note 19)00
Shareholders’ equity  
Preferred stock — without par value (authorized and unissued 2,000,000 shares)— — 
Common stock — par value $1.00 per share (Note 12) (authorized 4,320,000,000 shares; issued 3,119,843,000 shares)3,120 3,120 
Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) (Note 13)(13,058)(15,242)
Retained earnings123,060 113,890 
 113,122 101,768 
Less: common stock held in treasury, at cost (Note 12) (490,878,000 shares and 487,331,000 shares)39,099 38,490 
Total shareholders’ equity74,023 63,278 
Total liabilities and shareholders’ equity$182,018 174,894 
See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

3541




JOHNSON & JOHNSON AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF EARNINGS
(Dollars and Shares in Millions Except Per Share Amounts) (Note 1)
202120202019
Sales to customers$93,775 82,584 82,059 
Cost of products sold29,855 28,427 27,556 
Gross profit63,920 54,157 54,503 
Selling, marketing and administrative expenses24,659 22,084 22,178 
Research and development expense14,714 12,159 11,355 
In-process research and development (Note 5)900 181 890 
Interest income(53)(111)(357)
Interest expense, net of portion capitalized (Note 4)183 201 318 
Other (income) expense, net489 2,899 2,525 
Restructuring (Note 20)252 247 266 
Earnings before provision for taxes on income22,776 16,497 17,328 
Provision for taxes on income (Note 8)1,898 1,783 2,209 
Net earnings$20,878 14,714 15,119 
Net earnings per share (Notes 1 and 15)
    Basic$7.93 5.59 5.72 
    Diluted$7.81 5.51 5.63 
Average shares outstanding (Notes 1 and 15)
   Basic2,632.1 2,632.8 2,645.1 
   Diluted2,674.0 2,670.7 2,684.3 
 2019 2018 2017
Sales to customers$82,059
 81,581
 76,450
Cost of products sold27,556
 27,091
 25,439
Gross profit54,503
 54,490
 51,011
Selling, marketing and administrative expenses22,178
 22,540
 21,520
Research and development expense11,355
 10,775
 10,594
In-process research and development (Note 5)890
 1,126
 408
Interest income(357) (611) (385)
Interest expense, net of portion capitalized (Note 4)318
 1,005
 934
Other (income) expense, net2,525
 1,405
 (42)
Restructuring (Note 22)266
 251
 309
Earnings before provision for taxes on income17,328
 17,999
 17,673
Provision for taxes on income (Note 8)2,209
 2,702
 16,373
Net earnings$15,119
 15,297
 1,300
      
Net earnings per share (Notes 1 and 15)     
    Basic$5.72
 5.70
 0.48
    Diluted$5.63
 5.61
 0.47
Average shares outstanding (Notes 1 and 15)     
   Basic2,645.1
 2,681.5
 2,692.0
   Diluted2,684.3
 2,728.7
 2,745.3

See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements



3642




JOHNSON & JOHNSON AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME
(Dollars in Millions) (Note 1)

 2019 2018 2017
Net earnings$15,119
 15,297
 1,300
      
Other comprehensive income (loss), net of tax     
      Foreign currency translation164
 (1,518) 1,696
      
      Securities:     
          Unrealized holding gain (loss) arising during period
 (1) 159
          Reclassifications to earnings
 1
 (338)
          Net change
 
 (179)
      
      Employee benefit plans:     
          Prior service credit (cost), net of amortization(18) (44) 2
          Gain (loss), net of amortization(714) (56) 29
          Effect of exchange rates(1) 92
 (201)
          Net change(733) (8) (170)
      
      Derivatives & hedges:     
          Unrealized gain (loss) arising during period(107) (73) (4)
          Reclassifications to earnings7
 (192) 359
          Net change(100) (265) 355
      
Other comprehensive income (loss)(669) (1,791) 1,702
      
Comprehensive income$14,450
 13,506
 3,002
      
202120202019
Net earnings$20,878 14,714 15,119 
Other comprehensive income (loss), net of tax
      Foreign currency translation(1,079)(233)164 
      Securities:
          Unrealized holding gain (loss) arising during period(4)— 
          Reclassifications to earnings— — — 
          Net change(4)— 
      Employee benefit plans:
          Prior service credit (cost), net of amortization(169)1,298 (18)
          Gain (loss), net of amortization4,318 (1,135)(714)
          Effect of exchange rates106 (229)(1)
          Net change4,255 (66)(733)
      Derivatives & hedges:
          Unrealized gain (loss) arising during period(199)1,000 (107)
          Reclassifications to earnings(789)(53)
          Net change(988)947 (100)
Other comprehensive income (loss)2,184 649 (669)
Comprehensive income$23,062 15,363 14,450 
The tax effects in other comprehensive income for the fiscal years ended2021, 2020 and 2019 2018 and 2017 respectively: Foreign Currency Translation; $346 million, $536 million and $19 million; Securities: $1 million in 2019 and $236 million in 2018; Securities: $96 million in 2017,2021, Employee Benefit Plans: $222$1,198 million, $4$21 million and $83$222 million, Derivatives & Hedges: $27$263 million, $70$252 million and $191$27 million.
See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements


3743








JOHNSON & JOHNSON AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF EQUITY
(Dollars in Millions) (Note 1)
TotalRetained
Earnings
Accumulated
Other
Comprehensive
Income (Loss)
Common Stock
Issued Amount
Treasury
Stock
Amount
Balance, December 30, 2018$59,752 106,216 (15,222)3,120 (34,362)
Net earnings15,119 15,119    
Cash dividends paid ($3.75 per share)(9,917)(9,917)   
Employee compensation and stock option plans1,933 (758)  2,691 
Repurchase of common stock(6,746)  (6,746)
Other(1)(1)
Other comprehensive income (loss), net of tax(669)(669)  
Balance, December 29, 201959,471 110,659 (15,891)3,120 (38,417)
Net earnings14,714 14,714    
Cash dividends paid ($3.98 per share)(10,481)(10,481)   
Employee compensation and stock option plans2,217 (931)  3,148 
Repurchase of common stock(3,221)  (3,221)
Other(71)(71)
Other comprehensive income (loss), net of tax649  649   
Balance, January 3, 202163,278 113,890 (15,242)3,120 (38,490)
Net earnings20,878 20,878    
Cash dividends paid ($4.19 per share)(11,032)(11,032)   
Employee compensation and stock option plans2,171 (676)  2,847 
Repurchase of common stock(3,456)  (3,456)
Other comprehensive income (loss), net of tax2,184  2,184   
Balance, January 2, 2022$74,023 123,060 (13,058)3,120 (39,099)
 Total 
Retained
Earnings
 
Accumulated
Other
Comprehensive
Income (Loss)
 
Common Stock
Issued Amount
 
Treasury
Stock
Amount
Balance, January 1, 2017$70,418
 110,551
 (14,901) 3,120
 (28,352)
Net earnings1,300
 1,300
  
  
  
Cash dividends paid ($3.32 per share)(8,943) (8,943)  
  
  
Employee compensation and stock option plans2,077
 (1,079)  
  
 3,156
Repurchase of common stock(6,358) 

  
  
 (6,358)
Other(36) (36)      
Other comprehensive income (loss), net of tax1,702
   1,702
  
  
Balance, December 31, 201760,160
 101,793
 (13,199) 3,120
 (31,554)
Cumulative adjustment(486) (254)
(1 
) 
(232)    
Net earnings15,297
 15,297
  
  
  
Cash dividends paid ($3.54 per share)(9,494) (9,494)  
  
  
Employee compensation and stock option plans1,949
 (1,111)  
  
 3,060
Repurchase of common stock(5,868) 

  
  
 (5,868)
Other(15) (15)      
Other comprehensive income (loss), net of tax(1,791)  
 (1,791)  
  
Balance, December 30, 201859,752
 106,216
 (15,222) 3,120
 (34,362)
Net earnings15,119
 15,119
  
  
  
Cash dividends paid ($3.75 per share)(9,917) (9,917)  
  
  
Employee compensation and stock option plans1,933
 (758)  
  
 2,691
Repurchase of common stock(6,746) 

  
  
 (6,746)
Other(1) (1)      
Other comprehensive income (loss), net of tax(669)  
 (669)  
  
Balance, December 29, 2019$59,471
 110,659
 (15,891) 3,120
 (38,417)


(1) See Note 1 to Consolidated Financial Statements for additional details on the effect of cumulative adjustments to retained earnings.
See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements


3844




JOHNSON & JOHNSON AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(Dollars in Millions) (Note 1)
202120202019
Cash flows from operating activities  
Net earnings$20,878 14,714 15,119 
Adjustments to reconcile net earnings to cash flows from operating activities:  
Depreciation and amortization of property and intangibles7,390 7,231 7,009 
Stock based compensation1,135 1,005 977 
Asset write-downs989 233 1,096 
Contingent consideration reversal— (1,148)— 
Net gain on sale of assets/businesses(617)(111)(2,154)
Deferred tax provision(2,079)(1,141)(2,476)
Credit losses and accounts receivable allowances(48)63 (20)
Changes in assets and liabilities, net of effects from acquisitions and divestitures:  
(Increase)/Decrease in accounts receivable(2,402)774 (289)
Increase in inventories(1,248)(265)(277)
Increase in accounts payable and accrued liabilities2,437 5,141 4,060 
Increase in other current and non-current assets(1,964)(3,704)(1,054)
(Decrease)/Increase in other current and non-current liabilities(1,061)744 1,425 
Net cash flows from operating activities23,410 23,536 23,416 
Cash flows from investing activities  
Additions to property, plant and equipment(3,652)(3,347)(3,498)
Proceeds from the disposal of assets/businesses, net711 305 3,265 
Acquisitions, net of cash acquired (Note 18)(60)(7,323)(5,810)
Purchases of investments(30,394)(21,089)(3,920)
Sales of investments25,006 12,137 3,387 
Credit support agreements activity, net214 (987)338 
Other (primarily licenses and milestones)(508)(521)44 
Net cash used by investing activities(8,683)(20,825)(6,194)
Cash flows from financing activities 
Dividends to shareholders(11,032)(10,481)(9,917)
Repurchase of common stock(3,456)(3,221)(6,746)
Proceeds from short-term debt1,997 3,391 39 
Repayment of short-term debt(1,190)(2,663)(100)
Proceeds from long-term debt, net of issuance costs7,431 
Repayment of long-term debt(1,802)(1,064)(2,823)
Proceeds from the exercise of stock options/employee withholding tax on stock awards, net1,036 1,114 954 
Credit support agreements activity, net281 (333)100 
Other114 (294)475 
Net cash used by financing activities(14,047)(6,120)(18,015)
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents(178)89 (9)
Increase/(Decrease) in cash and cash equivalents502 (3,320)(802)
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of year (Note 1)13,985 17,305 18,107 
Cash and cash equivalents, end of year (Note 1)$14,487 13,985 17,305 
Supplemental cash flow data   
Cash paid during the year for:   
Interest$990 904 995 
Interest, net of amount capitalized941 841 925 
Income taxes4,768 4,619 4,191 
 2019 2018 2017
Cash flows from operating activities 
  
  
Net earnings$15,119
 15,297
 1,300
Adjustments to reconcile net earnings to cash flows from operating activities: 
  
  
Depreciation and amortization of property and intangibles7,009
 6,929
 5,642
Stock based compensation977
 978
 962
Asset write-downs1,096
 1,258
 795
Gain on sale of assets/businesses(2,154) (1,217) (1,307)
Deferred tax provision(2,476) (1,016) 2,406
Accounts receivable allowances(20) (31) 17
Changes in assets and liabilities, net of effects from acquisitions and divestitures: 
  
  
Increase in accounts receivable(289) (1,185) (633)
(Increase)/Decrease in inventories(277) (644) 581
Increase in accounts payable and accrued liabilities4,060
 3,951
 2,725
Increase in other current and non-current assets(1,054) (275) (411)
Increase/(Decrease) in other current and non-current liabilities1,425
 (1,844) 8,979
Net cash flows from operating activities23,416
 22,201
 21,056
Cash flows from investing activities 
  
  
Additions to property, plant and equipment(3,498) (3,670) (3,279)
Proceeds from the disposal of assets/businesses, net3,265
 3,203
 1,832
Acquisitions, net of cash acquired (Note 20)(5,810) (899) (35,151)
Purchases of investments(3,920) (5,626) (6,153)
Sales of investments3,387
 4,289
 28,117
Proceeds from credit support agreements338
 
 
Other44
 (464) (234)
Net cash used by investing activities(6,194) (3,167) (14,868)
Cash flows from financing activities   
  
Dividends to shareholders(9,917) (9,494) (8,943)
Repurchase of common stock(6,746) (5,868) (6,358)
Proceeds from short-term debt39
 80
 869
Repayment of short-term debt(100) (2,479) (1,330)
Proceeds from long-term debt, net of issuance costs
3
 5
 8,992
Repayment of long-term debt(2,823) (1,555) (1,777)
Proceeds from the exercise of stock options/employee withholding tax on stock awards, net954
 949
 1,062
Other575
 (148) (188)
Net cash used by financing activities(18,015) (18,510) (7,673)
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents(9) (241) 337
(Decrease)/Increase in cash and cash equivalents(802) 283
 (1,148)
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of year (Note 1)18,107
 17,824
 18,972
Cash and cash equivalents, end of year (Note 1)$17,305
 18,107
 17,824
      
Supplemental cash flow data 
  
  
Cash paid during the year for: 
  
  
Interest$995
 1,049
 960
Interest, net of amount capitalized925
 963
 866
Income taxes4,191
 4,570
 3,312
      

3945



Supplemental schedule of non-cash investing and financing activities 
  
  
Supplemental schedule of non-cash investing and financing activities   
Treasury stock issued for employee compensation and stock option plans, net of cash proceeds/ employee withholding tax on stock awards$1,736
 2,095
 2,062
Treasury stock issued for employee compensation and stock option plans, net of cash proceeds/ employee withholding tax on stock awards$1,811 1,937 1,736 
Conversion of debt1
 6
 16
Conversion of debt— 27 
     
Acquisitions 
  
  
Acquisitions   
Fair value of assets acquired$7,228
 1,047
 36,937
Fair value of assets acquired$61 7,755 7,228 
Fair value of liabilities assumed and noncontrolling interests(1,418) (148) (1,786)Fair value of liabilities assumed and noncontrolling interests(1)(432)(1,418)
Net cash paid for acquisitions (Note 20)$5,810
 899
 35,151
Net cash paid for acquisitions (Note 18)Net cash paid for acquisitions (Note 18)$60 7,323 5,810 
See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

4046






NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

1.Summary of Significant Accounting Policies
1.Summary of Significant Accounting Policies
Principles of Consolidation
The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of Johnson & Johnson and its subsidiaries (the Company). Intercompany accounts and transactions are eliminated. Columns and rows within tables may not add due to rounding. Percentages have been calculated using actual, non-rounded figures.
Description of the Company and Business Segments
The Company has approximately 132,200141,700 employees worldwide engaged in the research and development, manufacture and sale of a broad range of products in the health carehealthcare field. The Company conducts business in virtually all countries of the world and its primary focus is on products related to human health and well-being.
The Company is organized into 3 business segments: Consumer Health, Pharmaceutical and Medical Devices. The Consumer Health segment includes a broad range of products used in the baby care, oral care, beauty, over-the-counterBaby Care, Oral Care, Skin Health/Beauty, Over-the-Counter pharmaceutical, women’s healthWomen’s Health and wound careWound Care markets. These products are marketed to the general public and sold bothonline (eCommerce) and to retail outlets and distributors throughout the world. The Pharmaceutical segment is focused on six therapeutic areas, including immunology, infectiousImmunology, Infectious diseases, neuroscience, oncology, pulmonary hypertension,Neuroscience, Oncology, Pulmonary Hypertension, and cardiovascularCardiovascular and metabolicMetabolic diseases. Products in this segment are distributed directly to retailers, wholesalers, distributors, hospitals and health carehealthcare professionals for prescription use. The Medical Devices segment includes a broad range of products used in the orthopaedic, surgery, interventional solutionsOrthopaedic, Surgery, Interventional Solutions (cardiovascular and neurovascular) and eye health fields, whichVision fields. These products are distributed to wholesalers, hospitals and retailers, and used principally in the professional fields by physicians, nurses, hospitals, eye care professionals and clinics.
In November 2021, the Company announced its intention to separate the Company’s Consumer Health business, with the intention to create a new, publicly traded company. The Company is targeting completion of the planned separation in 18 to 24 months after initial announcement.


New Accounting Standards
Recently Adopted Accounting Standards
ASU 2016-02: Leases
The Company adopted this standard as of the beginning of fiscal year 2019, on a prospective basis. This update requires the recognition of lease assets and lease liabilities on the balance sheet for all lease obligations and disclosing key information about leasing arrangements. This update requires the recognition of lease assets and lease liabilities by lessees for arrangements that are classified as operating leases. The Company’s operating leases resulted in the recognition of additional assets and the corresponding liabilities on its Consolidated Balance Sheet, however it did not have aThere were no new material impact on the consolidated financial statements.
The Company determines whether an arrangement is a lease at contract inception by establishing if the contract conveys the right to control the use of identified property, plant, or equipment for a period of time in exchange for consideration.
Right of Use (ROU) Assets and Lease Liabilities for operating leases are included in Other assets, Accrued liabilities, and Other liabilities on the consolidated balance sheet. The ROU Assets represent the right to use an underlying asset for the lease term and lease liabilities represent an obligation to make lease payments arising from the lease. Commitments under finance leases are not significant, and are included in Property, plant and equipment, Loans and notes payable, and Long-term debt on the consolidated balance sheet.
ROU Assets and Lease Liabilities are recognized at the lease commencement date based on the present value of all minimum lease payments over the lease term. The Company uses its incremental borrowing rate based on the information available at commencement date in determining the present value of lease payments, when the implicit rate is not readily determinable. Lease terms may include options to extend or terminate the lease. These options are included in the lease term when it is reasonably certain that the Company will exercise that option. Operating lease expense is recognized on a straight-line basis over the lease term.
The Company has elected the following policy elections on adoption: use of portfolio approach on leases of assets under master service agreements, exclusion of short term leases on the balance sheet, and not separating lease and non-lease components.
For additional disclosures see Note 16 to the Consolidated Financial Statements.
ASU 2018-02: Reclassification of Certain Tax Effects from Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income
This update allows a Company to elect to reclassify stranded tax effects resulting from the Tax Cuts and Job Act enacted in December 2017 from accumulated other comprehensive income to retained earnings. The Company has elected not to reclassify the income tax effects of this standard and therefore this standard will not impact the Company's consolidated financial statements.

41




ASU 2018-16: Derivatives and Hedging (Topic ASC 815)
This update adds the Overnight Index Swap (OIS) rate based on the Secured Overnight Financing Rate (SOFR) as an eligible benchmark interest rate permitted in the application of hedge accounting. The guidance was effective for the Company as of the fiscal fourth quarter of 2018, due to the previous adoption of ASU 2017-12. The impact of the adoption of this guidance did not have a material impact on the Company’s consolidated financial statements and related disclosures. The standard may have an impact in the future as the market for SOFR derivatives develops over time and if SOFR is used to hedge the Company’s financial instruments.

Accounting Standardsaccounting standards adopted in the fiscal 2018 with a cumulative effect to the 2018 opening balance of Retained Earnings2021.
The following table summarizes the cumulative effect adjustments made to the 2018 opening balance of retained earnings upon adoption of the new accounting standards mentioned below:
(Dollars in Millions) Cumulative Effect Adjustment Increase (Decrease) to Retained Earnings
ASU 2014-09 - Revenue from Contracts with Customers $(47)
ASU 2016-01 - Financial Instruments 232
ASU 2016-16 - Income Taxes: Intra-Entity Transfers (439)
Total $(254)


Recently Issued Accounting Standards
Not Adopted as of December 29, 2019January 2, 2022
The Company assesses the adoption impacts of recently issued accounting standards by the Financial Accounting Standards Board on the Company's financial statements as well as material updates to previous assessments, if any, from the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended January 3, 2021. There were no new material accounting standards issued in fiscal 2021 that impacted the Company.
ASU 2018-18: Collaborative Arrangements
This update clarifiesASU 2021-01: Reference Rate Reform
In mid- 2017, the interaction between ASC 808, Collaborative ArrangementsFinancial Conduct Authority (FCA) announced that it will no longer require banks to submit rates for the London Interbank Offered Rate (LIBOR) after 2021 hence market participants should work to transition to alternative reference rates (Reference Rate Reform) and ASC 606, Revenue from Contracts with Customers.should not rely on LIBOR being available after the end of 2021. Reference rate reform is the term used to refer to the efforts that have been undertaken by regulators and other market participants to introduce new reference rates that are based on a larger and more liquid population of observable transactions. The update clarifiesCompany evaluated the implications of reference rate reform and applicable financial reporting guidance in ASU 2020-04, Reference Rate Reform (Topic 848): Facilitation of the Effects of Reference Rate Reform on Financial Reporting on its key financial and commercial contracts that certain transactions between participants inreferenced LIBOR including any hedging relationships. Most contracts reviewed will mature prior to the termination of LIBOR or will be modified to apply a collaborative arrangement should be accounted fornew reference rate (primarily the Secured Overnight Financing Rate “SOFR” where applicable). The company also applied available practical expedients under ASC 606848 to in scope financial and commercial contracts that previously referenced LIBOR when applicable. As a result, the counterparty is a customer. In addition, the update precludes an entity from presenting consideration from a transactionCompany's implementation of any reference rate reform provisions to commercial and financial contracts did not result in a collaborative arrangement as revenue if the counterparty is not a customer for that transaction. This update will be effectiveany material change for the Company for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2019, and interim periods within those fiscal years. ASU 2018-18 should be applied retrospectively to the date of initial application of ASC 606 and early adoption is permitted. The adoption of this standard will not have a material impact on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.

ASU 2016-13Company. : Financial Instruments - Credit Losses
This update introduces the current expected credit loss (CECL) model, which will require an entity to measure credit losses for certain financial instruments and financial assets, including trade receivables. Under this update, on initial recognition and at each reporting period, an entity will be required to recognize an allowance that reflects the entity’s current estimate of credit losses expected to be incurred over the life of the financial instrument. This update will be effective for the Company for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2019 and interim periods within those fiscal years. Early adoption is permitted. The adoption of this standard will not have a material impact on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.

Cash Equivalents
The Company classifies all highly liquid investments with stated maturities of three months or less from date of purchase as cash equivalents and all highly liquid investments with stated maturities of greater than three months from the date of purchase as current marketable securities. The Company has a policy of making investments only with commercial institutions that have
47


at least an investment grade credit rating. The Company invests its cash primarily in government securities and obligations, corporate debt securities, money market funds and reverse repurchase agreements (RRAs).
RRAs are collateralized by deposits in the form of Government Securities and Obligations for an amount not less than 102% of their value. The Company does not record an asset or liability as the Company is not permitted to sell or repledge the associated collateral. The Company has a policy that the collateral has at least an A (or equivalent) credit rating. The Company utilizes a third party custodian to manage the exchange of funds and ensure that collateral received is maintained at 102% of the value of the RRAs on a daily basis. RRAs with stated maturities of greater than three months from the date of purchase are classified as marketable securities.




42



Investments
Investments classified as held to maturity investments are reported at amortized cost and realized gains or losses are reported in earnings. Investments classified as available-for-sale debt securities are carried at estimated fair value with unrealized gains and losses recorded as a component of accumulated other comprehensive income. Available-for-sale securities available for current operations are classified as current assets otherwise, they are classified as long term. Management determines the appropriate classification of its investment in debt and equity securities at the time of purchase and re-evaluates such determination at each balance sheet date. The Company reviews its investments for impairment and adjusts these investments to fair value through earnings, as required. 
Property, Plant and Equipment and Depreciation
Property, plant and equipment are stated at cost. The Company utilizes the straight-line method of depreciation over the estimated useful lives of the assets:
Building and building equipment20 - 30 years
Land and leasehold improvements10 - 20 years
Machinery and equipment2 - 13 years


The Company capitalizes certain computer software and development costs, included in machinery and equipment, when incurred in connection with developing or obtaining computer software for internal use. Capitalized software costs are amortized over the estimated useful lives of the software, which generally range from 3 to 8 years.
The Company reviews long-lived assets to assess recoverability using undiscounted cash flows. When certain events or changes in operating or economic conditions occur, an impairment assessment may be performed on the recoverability of the carrying value of these assets. If the asset is determined to be impaired, the loss is measured based on the difference between the asset’s fair value and its carrying value. If quoted market prices are not available, the Company will estimate fair value using a discounted value of estimated future cash flows.
Revenue Recognition
The Company recognizes revenue from product sales when obligations under the terms of a contract with the customer are satisfied; generally, this occurs with the transfer of control of the goods to customers. The Company's global payment terms are typically between 30 to 90 days. Provisions for certain rebates, sales incentives, trade promotions, coupons, product returns, and discounts to customers and governmental clawback provisions are accounted for as variable consideration and recorded as a reduction in sales. The liability is recognized within Accrued Rebates, Returns, and Promotions on the consolidated balance sheet.
Product discounts granted are based on the terms of arrangements with direct, indirect and other market participants, as well as market conditions, including consideration of competitor pricing. Rebates are estimated based on contractual terms, historical experience, patient outcomes, trend analysis and projected market conditions in the various markets served. A significant portion of the liability related to rebates is from the sale of the Company's pharmaceutical products within the U.S., primarily the Managed Care, Medicare and Medicaid programs, which amounted to $7.0$7.7 billion and $5.8$7.2 billion as of December 29, 2019January 2, 2022 and December 30, 2018,January 3, 2021, respectively. The Company evaluates market conditions for products or groups of products primarily through the analysis of wholesaler and other third-party sell-through and market research data, as well as internally generated information.
Sales returns are estimated and recorded based on historical sales and returns information. Products that exhibit unusual sales or return patterns due to dating, competition or other marketing matters are specifically investigated and analyzed as part of the accounting for sales return accruals.
Sales returns allowances represent a reserve for products that may be returned due to expiration, destruction in the field, or in specific areas, product recall. The sales returns reserve is based on historical return trends by product and by market as a percent to gross sales. In accordance with the Company’s accounting policies, the Company generally issues credit to customers for returned goods. The Company’s sales returns reserves are accounted for in accordance with the U.S. GAAP guidance for revenue recognition when right of return exists. Sales returns reserves are recorded at full sales value. Sales returns in the Consumer Health and Pharmaceutical segments are almost exclusively not resalable. Sales returns for certain franchises in the
48


Medical Devices segment are typically resalable but are not material. The Company infrequently exchanges products from inventory for returned products. The sales returns reserve for the total Company has been approximately 1.0% of annual net trade sales during each of the fiscal reporting years 2019, 20182021, 2020 and 2017.2019.
Promotional programs, such as product listing allowances and cooperative advertising arrangements, are recorded in the same period as related sales. Continuing promotional programs include coupons and volume-based sales incentive programs. The redemption cost of consumer coupons is based on historical redemption experience by product and value. Volume-based incentive programs are based on the estimated sales volumes for the incentive period and are recorded as products are sold. These arrangements are evaluated to determine the appropriate amounts to be deferred or recorded as a reduction of revenue. The Company also earns profit-share payments through collaborative arrangements for certain products, which are included in

43



sales to customers. For all years presented, profit-share payments were approximately 2.0%less than 3.0% of the total revenues and are included in sales to customers.
See Note 1817 to the Consolidated Financial Statements for further disaggregation of revenue.
Shipping and Handling
Shipping and handling costs incurred were $1.1 billion, $1.0 billion $1.1and $1.0 billion in fiscal years 2021, 2020 and $1.0 billion in 2019,, 2018 and 2017, respectively, and are included in selling, marketing and administrative expense. The amount of revenue received for shipping and handling is less than 0.5% of sales to customers for all periods presented.
Inventories
Inventories are stated at the lower of cost or net realizable value determined by the first-in, first-out method.
Intangible Assets and Goodwill
The authoritative literature on U.S. GAAP requires that goodwill and intangible assets with indefinite lives be assessed annually for impairment. The Company completed its annual impairment test for 20192021 in the fiscal fourth quarter. Future impairment tests will be performed annually in the fiscal fourth quarter, or sooner if warranted. Purchased in-process research and development is accounted for as an indefinite lived intangible asset until the underlying project is completed, at which point the intangible asset will be accounted for as a definite lived intangible asset, or abandoned, at which point the intangible asset will be written off or partially impaired.
Intangible assets that have finite useful lives continue to be amortized over their useful lives, and are reviewed for impairment when warranted by economic conditions. See Note 5 for further details on Intangible Assets and Goodwill.
Financial Instruments
As required by U.S. GAAP, all derivative instruments are recorded on the balance sheet at fair value. Fair value is the exit price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability. Fair value is a market-based measurement determined using assumptions that market participants would use in pricing an asset or liability. The authoritative literature establishes a three-level hierarchy to prioritize the inputs used in measuring fair value, with Level 1 having the highest priority and Level 3 having the lowest. Changes in the fair value of derivatives are recorded each period in current earnings or other comprehensive income, depending on whether the derivative is designated as part of a hedge transaction, and if so, the type of hedge transaction.
The Company documents all relationships between hedged items and derivatives. The overall risk management strategy includes reasons for undertaking hedge transactions and entering into derivatives. The objectives of this strategy are: (1) minimize foreign currency exposure’s impact on the Company’s financial performance; (2) protect the Company’s cash flow from adverse movements in foreign exchange rates; (3) ensure the appropriateness of financial instruments; and (4) manage the enterprise risk associated with financial institutions. See Note 6 for additional information on Financial Instruments.

Leases
The Company determines whether an arrangement is a lease at contract inception by establishing if the contract conveys the right to control the use of identified property, plant, or equipment for a period of time in exchange for consideration. Right of Use (ROU) Assets and Lease Liabilities for operating leases are included in Other assets, Accrued liabilities, and Other liabilities on the consolidated balance sheet. The ROU Assets represent the right to use an underlying asset for the lease term and lease liabilities represent an obligation to make lease payments arising from the lease. Commitments under finance leases are not significant, and are included in Property, plant and equipment, Loans and notes payable, and Long-term debt on the consolidated balance sheet.
ROU Assets and Lease Liabilities are recognized at the lease commencement date based on the present value of all minimum lease payments over the lease term. The Company uses its incremental borrowing rate based on the information available at commencement date in determining the present value of lease payments, when the implicit rate is not readily determinable. Lease terms may include options to extend or terminate the lease. These options are included in the lease term when it is reasonably certain that the Company will exercise that option. Operating lease expense is recognized on a straight-line basis over the lease term. The Company has elected the following policy elections on adoption: use of portfolio approach
49


on leases of assets under master service agreements, exclusion of short term leases on the balance sheet, and not separating lease and non-lease components.
The Company primarily has operating lease for space, vehicles, manufacturing equipment and data processing equipment. The ROU asset pertaining to operating leases was $0.9 billion and $1.0 billion in 2021 and 2020, respectively. The lease liability was $1.0 billion and $1.1 billion in 2021and 2020, respectively. The operating lease costs were $0.3 billion, $0.3 billion and $0.3 billion in 2021, 2020 and 2019, respectively. Cash paid for amounts included in the measurement of lease liabilities were $0.3 billion, $0.3 billion and $0.3 billion in 2021, 2020 and 2019, respectively.
Product Liability
Accruals for product liability claims are recorded, on an undiscounted basis, when it is probable that a liability has been incurred and the amount of the liability can be reasonably estimated based on existing information and actuarially determined estimates where applicable. The accruals are adjusted periodically as additional information becomes available. The Company accrues an estimate of the legal defense costs needed to defend each matter when those costs are probable and can be reasonably estimated. To the extent adverse verdicts have been rendered against the Company, the Company does not record an accrual until a loss is determined to be probable and can be reasonably estimated.
The Company has self insurance through a wholly-owned captive insurance company. In addition to accruals in the self insurance program, claims that exceed the insurance coverage are accrued when losses are probable and amounts can be reasonably estimated.
Research and Development
Research and development expenses are expensed as incurred in accordance with ASC 730, Research and Development. Upfront and milestone payments made to third parties in connection with research and development collaborations are expensed as incurred up to the point of regulatory approval. Payments made to third parties subsequent to regulatory approval are capitalized and amortized over the remaining useful life of the related product. Amounts capitalized for such payments are included in other intangibles, net of accumulated amortization.
The Company enters into collaborative arrangements, typically with other pharmaceutical or biotechnology companies, to develop and commercialize drug candidates or intellectual property. These arrangements typically involve two (or more) parties who are active participants in the collaboration and are exposed to significant risks and rewards dependent on the commercial success of the activities. These collaborations usually involve various activities by one or more parties, including research and development, marketing and selling and distribution. Often, these collaborations require upfront, milestone and royalty or profit

44



share payments, contingent upon the occurrence of certain future events linked to the success of the asset in development. Amounts due from collaborative partners related to development activities are generally reflected as a reduction of research and development expense because the performance of contract development services is not central to the Company’s operations. In general, the income statement presentation for these collaborations is as follows:

Nature/Type of CollaborationStatement of Earnings Presentation
Third-party sale of product & profit share payments receivedSales to customers
Royalties/milestones paid to collaborative partner (post-regulatory approval)*Cost of products sold
Royalties received from collaborative partnerOther income (expense), net
Upfront payments & milestones paid to collaborative partner (pre-regulatory approval)Research and development expense
Research and development payments to collaborative partnerResearch and development expense
Research and development payments received from collaborative partner or government entityReduction of Research and development expense
*Milestones are capitalized as intangible assets and amortized to cost of products sold over the useful life.
For all years presented, there was no individual project that represented greater than 5% of the total annual consolidated research and development expense.
The Company has a number of products and compounds developed in collaboration with strategic partners including XARELTO®, co-developed with Bayer HealthCare AG and IMBRUVICA®, developed in collaboration and co-marketed with Pharmacyclics LLC, an AbbVie company.
Separately, the Company has a number of licensing arrangements for products and compounds including DARZALEX®, licensed from Genmab A/S.
Advertising
Costs associated with advertising are expensed in the year incurred and are included in selling, marketing and administrative expenses. Advertising expenses worldwide, which comprised television, radio, print media and Internet advertising, were $2.7 billion, $2.1 billion and $2.2 billion $2.6 billionin fiscal years 2021, 2020 and $2.5 billion in 2019, 2018 and 2017, respectively.
50


Income Taxes
Income taxes are recorded based on amounts refundable or payable for the current year and include the results of any difference between U.S. GAAP accounting and tax reporting, recorded as deferred tax assets or liabilities. The Company estimates deferred tax assets and liabilities based on enacted tax regulations and rates. Future changes in tax laws and rates may affect recorded deferred tax assets and liabilities in the future.
The Company has unrecognized tax benefits for uncertain tax positions. The Company follows U.S. GAAP which prescribes a recognition threshold and measurement attribute for the financial statement recognition and measurement of a tax position taken or expected to be taken in a tax return. Management believes that changes in these estimates would not have a material effect on the Company's results of operations, cash flows or financial position.
In 2017, the United States enacted into law new U.S. tax legislation, the U.S. Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (TCJA). This law included provisions for a comprehensive overhaul of the corporate income tax code, including a reduction of the statutory corporate tax rate from 35% to 21%, effective on January 1, 2018. The TCJA included a provision for a tax on all previously undistributed earnings of U.S. companies located in foreign jurisdictions. Undistributed earnings in the form of cash and cash equivalents were taxed at a rate of 15.5% and all other earnings were taxed at a rate of 8.0%. This tax is payable over 8 years and will not accrue interest. These payments began in 2018 and will continue through 2025. The remaining balance at the end of the 2021 was approximately $6.9 billion, of which $6.1 billion is classified as noncurrent and reflected as “Long-term taxes payable” on the Company’s balance sheet. The balance of this account is related to receivables from tax authorities not expected to be received in the next 12 months.
The TCJA also includes provisions for a tax on global intangible low-taxed income (GILTI). GILTI is described as the excess of a U.S. shareholder’s total net foreign income over a deemed return on tangible assets, as provided by the TCJA. In January 2018, the FASB issued guidance that allows companies to elect as an accounting policy whether to record the tax effects of the global intangible low-taxed income (GILTI)GILTI in the period the tax liability is generated (i.e., “period cost”) or provide for deferred tax assets and liabilities related to basis differences that exist and are expected to effect the amount of GILTI inclusion in future years upon reversal (i.e., “deferred method”). In fiscal 2018, theThe Company has elected to account for GILTI under the deferred method. The deferred tax amounts recorded are based on the evaluation of temporary differences that are expected to reverse as GILTI is incurred in future periods.
The Company has recorded deferred tax liabilities on all undistributed earnings prior to December 31, 2017 from its international subsidiaries. The Company has not provided deferred taxes on the undistributed earnings subsequent to January 1, 2018 from certain international subsidiaries where the earnings are considered to be indefinitely reinvested. The Company intends to continue to reinvest these earnings in those international operations. If the Company decides at a later date to repatriate these earnings to the U.S., the Company would be required to provide for the net tax effects on these amounts. The Company estimates that the total tax effect of this repatriation would be approximately $0.8$0.7 billion under currentcurrently enacted tax laws and regulations and at current currency exchange rates. This amount does not include the possible benefit of U.S. foreign tax credits, which may substantially offset this cost.
See Note 8 to the Consolidated Financial Statements for further information regarding income taxes.



45



Net Earnings Per Share
Basic earnings per share is computed by dividing net earnings available to common shareholders by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding for the period. Diluted earnings per share reflects the potential dilution that could occur if securities were exercised or converted into common stock using the treasury stock method.
Use of Estimates
The preparation of consolidated financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the U.S. requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the amounts reported. Estimates are used when accounting for sales discounts, rebates, allowances and incentives, product liabilities, income taxes, withholding taxes, depreciation, amortization, employee benefits, contingencies and intangible asset and liability valuations. Actual results may or may not differ from those estimates.
The Company follows the provisions of U.S. GAAP when recording litigation related contingencies. A liability is recorded when a loss is probable and can be reasonably estimated. The best estimate of a loss within a range is accrued; however, if no estimate in the range is better than any other, the minimum amount is accrued.
The extent to which COVID-19 impacts the Company’s business and financial results will depend on numerous evolving factors including, but not limited to: the magnitude and duration of COVID-19, the extent to which it will impact worldwide macroeconomic conditions including interest rates, employment rates and health insurance coverage, the speed of the anticipated recovery, and governmental and business reactions to the pandemic. The Company assessed certain accounting matters that generally require consideration of forecasted financial information in context with the information reasonably available to the Company and the unknown future impacts of COVID-19 as of January 2, 2022 and through the date of this report. The accounting matters assessed included, but were not limited to, the Company’s allowance for doubtful accounts and credit losses, inventory and related reserves, accrued rebates and associated reserves, and the carrying value of the goodwill and other long-lived assets along with the Company’s on-going vaccine development and distribution efforts. While there was not a material impact to the Company’s consolidated financial statements as of and for the fiscal year ended January 2, 2022, the Company’s future assessment of the magnitude and duration of COVID-19, as well as other factors, could result in material impacts to the Company’s consolidated financial statements in future reporting periods.
51


Annual Closing Date
The Company follows the concept of a fiscal year, which ends on the Sunday nearest to the end of the month of December. Normally each fiscal year consists of 52 weeks, but every five or six years the fiscal year consists of 53 weeks,, and therefore includes additional shipping days, as was the case in 2015,fiscal year 2020, and will be the case again in 2020.fiscal year 2026.
Reclassification
Certain prior period amounts have been reclassified to conform to current year presentation.

2.Cash, Cash Equivalents and Current Marketable Securities52



2.Cash, Cash Equivalents and Current Marketable Securities
At the end of the fiscal year 20192021 and 2018,2020, cash, cash equivalents and current marketable securities were comprised of:
(Dollars in Millions)2021
Carrying AmountUnrecognized LossEstimated Fair ValueCash & Cash EquivalentsCurrent Marketable Securities
Cash$2,936 — 2,936 2,936 — 
Non-U.S. Sovereign Securities(1)
1,006 — 1,006 90 916 
U.S. Reverse repurchase agreements1,659 — 1,659 1,659 — 
Corporate debt securities(1)
3,479 (1)3,478 200 3,279 
Money market funds1,901 — 1,901 1,901 — 
Time deposits(1)
900 — 900 900 — 
    Subtotal$11,881 (1)11,880 7,686 4,195 
U.S. Gov't Securities$19,485 (4)19,481 6,785 12,696 
Other Sovereign Securities — 
Corporate debt securities245  245 15 230 
   Subtotal available for sale(2)
$19,731 (4)19,727 6,801 12,926 
Total cash, cash equivalents and current marketable securities$14,487 17,121 
(Dollars in Millions) 2019
  Carrying Amount Cash & Cash Equivalents Current Marketable Securities
Cash $2,637
 2,637
 
Non-U.S. Sovereign Securities(1)
 439
 149
 290
U.S. Reverse repurchase agreements 6,375
 6,375
 
Other Reverse repurchase agreements 375
 375
 
Corporate debt securities(1)
 1,323
 889
 434
Money market funds 2,864
 2,864
 
Time deposits(1)
 906
 906
 
    Subtotal $14,919
 14,195
 724
       
U.S. Gov't Securities $4,102
 3,095
 1,007
Corporate debt securities 266
 15
 251
   Subtotal available for sale(2)
 $4,368
 3,110
 1,258
       
Total cash, cash equivalents and current marketable securities 

 $17,305
 1,982





46



(Dollars in Millions) 2018
  Carrying Amount Cash & Cash Equivalents Current Marketable Securities
Cash $2,619
 2,619
 
U.S. Reverse repurchase agreements 3,009
 3,009
 
Other Reverse repurchase agreements 443
 443
 
Money market funds 3,397
 3,397
 
Time deposits(1)
 485
 485
 
    Subtotal $9,953
 9,953
 
       
Gov't Securities $9,474
 8,144
 1,330
Corporate debt securities 260
 10
 250
   Subtotal available for sale(2)
 $9,734
 8,154
 1,580
       
Total cash, cash equivalents and current marketable securities   $18,107
 1,580

(Dollars in Millions)2020
Carrying AmountUnrecognized GainEstimated Fair ValueCash & Cash EquivalentsCurrent Marketable Securities
Cash$2,863 — 2,863 2,863 — 
Non-U.S. Sovereign Securities(1)
690 — 690 — 690 
U.S. Reverse repurchase agreements1,937 — 1,937 1,937 — 
Corporate debt securities(1)
2,674 — 2,674 1,451 1,223 
Money market funds2,102 — 2,102 2,102 — 
Time deposits(1)
877 — 877 877 — 
    Subtotal$11,143 — 11,143 9,230 1,913 
Gov't Securities$13,777 13,778 4,731 9,047 
Other Sovereign Securities14 — 14 — 14 
Corporate debt securities250 — 250 24 226 
   Subtotal available for sale(2)
$14,041 14,042 4,755 9,287 
Total cash, cash equivalents and current marketable securities$13,985 11,200 

(1) Held to maturity investments are reported at amortized cost and realized gains or losses are reported in earnings.
(2) Available for sale debt securities are reported at fair value with unrealized gains and losses reported net of taxes in other comprehensive income.


53


Fair value of government securities and obligations and corporate debt securities were estimated using quoted broker prices and significant other observable inputs.
In 2019 and 2018, the carrying amount was the same as the estimated fair value.


The contractual maturities of the available for sale debt securities at December 29, 2019January 2, 2022 are as follows:
(Dollars in Millions) Cost Basis Fair Value
Due within one year $4,322
 4,322
Due after one year through five years 46
 46
Due after five years through ten years 
 
Total debt securities $4,368
 4,368

(Dollars in Millions)Cost BasisFair Value
Due within one year$19,709 19,705 
Due after one year through five years22 22 
Due after five years through ten years— — 
Total debt securities$19,731 19,727 
The Company invests its excess cash in both deposits with major banks throughout the world and other high-quality money market instruments. The Company has a policy of making investments only with commercial institutions that have at least an investment grade credit rating.

3.Inventories
3.Inventories
At the end of 2019fiscal years 2021 and 2018,2020, inventories were comprised of:
(Dollars in Millions)20212020
Raw materials and supplies$1,592 1,410 
Goods in process2,287 2,040 
Finished goods6,508 5,894 
Total inventories$10,387 9,344 
(Dollars in Millions) 2019 2018
Raw materials and supplies $1,117
 1,114
Goods in process 1,832
 2,109
Finished goods 6,071
 5,376
Total inventories (1)
 $9,020
 8,599

(1)See Note 20 to the Consolidated Financial Statements for details on assets held for sale and the related divestitures.



4.
47
Property, Plant and Equipment



4.Property, Plant and Equipment
At the end of 2019fiscal years 2021 and 2018,2020, property, plant and equipment at cost and accumulated depreciation were:
(Dollars in Millions) 2019 2018(Dollars in Millions)20212020
Land and land improvements $854
 807
Land and land improvements$884 882 
Buildings and building equipment 11,877
 11,176
Buildings and building equipment12,882 12,502 
Machinery and equipment 26,964
 25,992
Machinery and equipment29,774 29,104 
Construction in progress 3,637
 3,876
Construction in progress4,139 4,316 
Total property, plant and equipment, gross $43,332
 41,851
Total property, plant and equipment, gross$47,679 46,804 
Less accumulated depreciation 25,674
 24,816
Less accumulated depreciation28,717 28,038 
Total property, plant and equipment, net(1)
 $17,658
 17,035
Total property, plant and equipment, net(1)
$18,962 18,766 
(1)
See Note 20 to the Consolidated Financial Statements for details on assets held for sale and the related divestitures.

The Company capitalizes interest expense as part of the cost of construction of facilities and equipment. Interest expense capitalized in fiscal years 2021, 2020 and 2019 2018 and 2017 was $70$49 million, $86$63 million and $94$70 million, respectively.
Depreciation expense, including the amortization of capitalized interest in fiscal years 2021, 2020 and 2019 2018 and 2017 was $2.5$2.7 billion, $2.6 billion and $2.6$2.5 billion, respectively.
Upon retirement or other disposal of property, plant and equipment, the costs and related amounts of accumulated depreciation or amortization are eliminated from the asset and accumulated depreciation accounts, respectively. The difference, if any, between the net asset value and the proceeds are recorded in earnings.


5.Intangible Assets and Goodwill54



5.Intangible Assets and Goodwill
At the end of 2019fiscal years 2021 and 2018,2020, the gross and net amounts of intangible assets were:
(Dollars in Millions)20212020
Intangible assets with definite lives:  
Patents and trademarks — gross$38,572 39,990 
Less accumulated amortization(20,088)(17,618)
Patents and trademarks — net$18,484 22,372 
Customer relationships and other intangibles — gross$23,011 22,898 
Less accumulated amortization(11,925)(10,912)
Customer relationships and other intangibles — net(1)
$11,086 11,986 
Intangible assets with indefinite lives:  
Trademarks$6,985 7,195 
Purchased in-process research and development(2)
9,837 11,849 
Total intangible assets with indefinite lives$16,822 19,044 
Total intangible assets — net$46,392 53,402 
(Dollars in Millions) 2019 2018
Intangible assets with definite lives:  
  
Patents and trademarks — gross $36,634
 35,194
Less accumulated amortization 13,154
 9,784
Patents and trademarks — net $23,480
 25,410
Customer relationships and other intangibles — gross $22,056
 21,334
Less accumulated amortization 9,462
 8,323
Customer relationships and other intangibles — net* $12,594
 13,011
Intangible assets with indefinite lives:  
  
Trademarks $6,922
 6,937
Purchased in-process research and development(1)
 4,647
 2,253
Total intangible assets with indefinite lives $11,569
 9,190
Total intangible assets — net $47,643
 47,611

(1)
*The majority is comprised of customer relationships
(1) (2)In the fiscal year 2019, the Company completed the acquisition of Auris Health, Inc. and recorded an in-process research and development intangible asset of $2.9 billion. Additionally, in the fiscal first quarter of 2019,2021, the Company recorded ana partial IPR&D impairment charge of $0.9 billion for the remaining intangible asset valueprimarily related to expected development delays in the development program of AL-8176, an investigational drug for the treatment of Respiratory Syncytial Virus (RSV) and human metapneumovirus (hMPV)general surgery digital robotics platform (Ottava) acquired with the 2014Auris Health acquisition of Alios Biopharma Inc.in 2019. The impairment charge was calculated based on additional information, including clinical data, which became available and ledrevisions to the Company's decision to abandondiscounted cash flow valuation model reflecting a delay of first in human procedures of approximately two years from the developmentinitial acquisition model assumption of AL-8176. A partial impairment chargethe second half of $0.8 billion2022. The remaining reduction was previously recorded in the fiscal third quarter 2018 related to the development program of AL-8176.driven by assets that reached commercialization and are now classified as having definite lives.










48




Goodwill as of December 29, 2019January 2, 2022 and December 30, 2018,January 3, 2021, as allocated by segment of business, was as follows:
(Dollars in Millions)Consumer HealthPharmaceuticalMedical DevicesTotal
Goodwill at December 29, 2019$9,736 9,169 14,734 33,639 
Goodwill, related to acquisitions— 1,222 238 1,460 
Currency translation/other600 618 76 1,294 
Goodwill at January 3, 2021$10,336 11,009 15,048 36,393 
Goodwill, related to acquisitions— — — — 
Goodwill, related to divestitures(9)— — (9)
Currency translation/other(517)(429)(192)(1,138)
Goodwill at January 2, 2022$9,810 10,580 14,856 35,246 
(Dollars in Millions) Consumer Pharmaceutical Medical Devices Total
Goodwill at December 31, 2017 $8,875
 9,109
 13,922
 31,906
Goodwill, related to acquisitions 168
 51
 184
 403
Goodwill, related to divestitures 
 
 (1,348)
(1) 
(1,348)
Currency translation/other (373) (97) (38) (508)
Goodwill at December 30, 2018 $8,670
 9,063
 12,720
 30,453
Goodwill, related to acquisitions 1,188
 75
 2,018
 3,281
Currency translation/other (122) 31
 (4) (95)
Goodwill at December 29, 2019 $9,736
 9,169
 14,734
 33,639


(1) Goodwill of $1.0 billion is related to the divestiture of the LifeScan business. Goodwill of $0.3 billion is related to the divestiture of the Advanced Sterilization Products business which closed in 2019, and was pending and classified as assets held for sale on the Consolidated Balance Sheet as of December 30, 2018.

The weighted average amortization period for patents and trademarks is 12 years. The weighted average amortization period for customer relationships and other intangible assets is 21 years. The amortization expense of amortizable assets included in costCost of products sold was $4.5$4.7 billion, $4.4$4.7 billion and $3.0$4.5 billion before tax, for the fiscal years ended January 2, 2022, January 3, 2021 and December 29, 2019, December 30, 2018 and December 31, 2017, respectively. Intangible asset write-downs are included in Other (income) expense, net.

The estimated amortization expense for approved products, before tax, for the five succeeding years is approximately:
(Dollars in Millions)
20222023202420252026
$4,6004,6004,4003,6003,000
(Dollars in Millions)      
2020 2021 2022 2023 2024
$4,500 4,300 4,100 4,100 4,000


See Note 2018 to the Consolidated Financial Statements for additional details related to acquisitions and divestitures.



6.Fair Value Measurements
6.Fair Value Measurements55


The Company uses forward foreign exchange contracts to manage its exposure to the variability of cash flows, primarily related to the foreign exchange rate changes of future intercompany products and third-party purchases of materials denominated in a foreign currency. The Company uses cross currency interest rate swaps to manage currency risk primarily related to borrowings. Both types of derivatives are designated as cash flow hedges.
Additionally, the Company uses interest rate swaps as an instrument to manage interest rate risk related to fixed rate borrowings. These derivatives are designated as fair value hedges. The Company uses cross currency interest rate swaps and forward foreign exchange contracts designated as net investment hedges. Additionally, the Company uses forward foreign exchange contracts to offset its exposure to certain foreign currency assets and liabilities. These forward foreign exchange contracts are not designated as hedges and therefore, changes in the fair values of these derivatives are recognized in earnings, thereby offsetting the current earnings effect of the related foreign currency assets and liabilities.
The Company does not enter into derivative financial instruments for trading or speculative purposes, or that contain credit risk related contingent features. The Company maintains credit support agreements (CSA) with certain derivative counterparties establishing collateral thresholds based on respective credit ratings and netting agreements. As of December 29, 2019,January 2, 2022, the total amount of cash collateral heldpaid by the Company under the credit support agreements (CSA)CSA amounted to $255$570 million net, primarily related to net investment and cash flow hedges. On an ongoing basis, the Company monitors counter-party credit ratings. The Company considers credit non-performance risk to be low, because the Company primarily enters into agreements with commercial institutions that have at least an investment grade credit rating. Refer to the table on significant financial assets and liabilities measured at fair value contained in this footnote for receivables and payables with these commercial institutions. As of December 29, 2019,January 2, 2022, the Company had notional amounts outstanding for forward foreign exchange contracts, and cross currency interest rate swaps of $45.3 billion, and $20.1 billion respectively. As of December 30, 2018, the Company

49



had notional amounts outstanding for forward foreign exchange contracts, cross currency interest rate swaps and interest rate swaps of $41.1$45.8 billion, $7.3$37.4 billion and $0.5$10.0 billion, respectively.

As of January 3, 2021, the Company had notional amounts outstanding for forward foreign exchange contracts and cross currency interest rate swaps of $37.8 billion and $30.6 billion, respectively.
All derivative instruments are recorded on the balance sheet at fair value. Changes in the fair value of derivatives are recorded each period in current earnings or other comprehensive income, depending on whether the derivative is designated as part of a hedge transaction, and if so, the type of hedge transaction.
The designation as a cash flow hedge is made at the entrance date of the derivative contract. At inception, all derivatives are expected to be highly effective. Foreign exchange contracts designated as cash flow hedges are accounted for under the forward method and all gains/losses associated with these contracts will be recognized in the income statement when the hedged item impacts earnings. Changes in the fair value of these derivatives are recorded in accumulated other comprehensive income until the underlying transaction affects earnings, and are then reclassified to earnings in the same account as the hedged transaction.
Gains and losses associated with interest rate swaps and changes in fair value of hedged debt attributable to changes in interest rates are recorded to interest expense in the period in which they occur. The effect of which are immaterial for the fiscal years ended December 29, 2019 and December 30, 2018. Gains and losses on net investment hedge are accounted through the currency translation account within accumulated other comprehensive income. The portion excluded from effectiveness testing is recorded through interest (income) expense using the spot method. On an ongoing basis, the Company assesses whether each derivative continues to be highly effective in offsetting changes of hedged items. If and when a derivative is no longer expected to be highly effective, hedge accounting is discontinued.
The Company designated its Euro denominated notes issued in May 2016 with due dates ranging from 2022 to 2035 as a net investment hedge of the Company's investments in certain of its international subsidiaries that use the Euro as their functional currency in order to reduce the volatility caused by changes in exchange rates.
As of December 29, 2019,January 2, 2022, the balance of deferred net loss on derivatives included in accumulated other comprehensive income was $295$336 million after-tax. For additional information, see the Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income and Note 13. The Company expects that substantially all of the amounts related to forward foreign exchange contracts will be reclassified into earnings over the next 12 months as a result of transactions that are expected to occur over that period. The maximum length of time over which the Company is hedging transaction exposure is 18 months, excluding interest rate contracts and net investment hedges. The amount ultimately realized in earnings may differ as foreign exchange rates change. Realized gains and losses are ultimately determined by actual exchange rates at maturity of the derivative.


5056



The following table is a summary of the activity related to derivatives and hedges for the fiscal years ended December 29, 2019January 2, 2022 and December 30, 2018,January 3, 2021, net of tax:
January 2, 2022January 3, 2021
(Dollars in Millions)SalesCost of Products SoldR&D ExpenseInterest (Income) ExpenseOther (Income) ExpenseSalesCost of Products SoldR&D ExpenseInterest (Income) ExpenseOther (Income) Expense
The effects of fair value, net investment and cash flow hedging:
Gain (Loss) on fair value hedging relationship:
Interest rate swaps contracts:
 Hedged items$— — — (109)— — — — — — 
 Derivatives designated as hedging instruments— — — 109 — — — — — — 
Gain (Loss) on net investment hedging relationship:
Cross currency interest rate swaps contracts:
   Amount of gain or (loss) recognized in income on derivative amount excluded from effectiveness testing$— — — 174 — — — — 153 — 
   Amount of gain or (loss) recognized in AOCI— — — 174 — — — — 153 — 
Gain (Loss) on cash flow hedging relationship:
Forward foreign exchange contracts:
   Amount of gain or (loss) reclassified from AOCI into income17 119 30 — 47 12 (329)(137)— (16)
   Amount of gain or (loss) recognized in AOCI(94)(557)123 — 146 44 298 (91)— (52)
Cross currency interest rate swaps contracts:
   Amount of gain or (loss) reclassified from AOCI into income— — — 402 — — — — 370 — 
   Amount of gain or (loss) recognized in AOCI$— — — — — — — 748 — 


As of January 2, 2022 and January 3, 2021, the following amounts were recorded on the consolidated balance sheet related to cumulative basis adjustment for fair value hedges

Line item in the Consolidated Balance Sheet in which the hedged item is includedCarrying Amount of the Hedged LiabilityCumulative Amount of Fair Value Hedging Adjustment Included in the Carrying Amount of the Hedged Liability
(Dollars in Millions)January 2, 2022January 3, 2021January 2, 2022January 3, 2021
Long-term Debt$9,793 $— $(142)$— 
 December 29, 2019December 30, 2018
(Dollars in Millions)SalesCost of Products SoldR&D ExpenseInterest (Income) ExpenseOther (Income) ExpenseSalesCost of Products SoldR&D ExpenseInterest (Income) ExpenseOther (Income) Expense
The effects of fair value, net investment and cash flow hedging:          
           
Gain (Loss) on net investment hedging relationship:          
Cross currency interest rate swaps contracts:          
   Amount of gain or (loss) recognized in income on derivative amount excluded from effectiveness testing


159




56

   Amount of gain or (loss) recognized in AOCI


159




56

           
Gain (Loss) on cash flow hedging relationship:          
Forward foreign exchange contracts:          
   Amount of gain or (loss) reclassified from AOCI into income(54)(321)(105)
22
47
200
(220)
(24)
           
   Amount of gain or (loss) recognized in AOCI(20)(606)(94)
39
(32)(17)(193)
(4)
           
Cross currency interest rate swaps contracts:          
   Amount of gain or (loss) reclassified from AOCI into income


292




133

   Amount of gain or (loss) recognized in AOCI$


415




117



57


ForThe following table is the effect of derivatives not designated as hedging instrument for the fiscal years ended December 29, 2019January 2, 2022 and December 30, 2018, the following amounts were recorded on the Consolidated Balance SheetJanuary 3, 2021:
(Dollars in Millions)Location of Gain /(Loss) Recognized in Income on DerivativeGain/(Loss)
Recognized In
Income on Derivative
Derivatives Not Designated as Hedging InstrumentsJanuary 2, 2022January 3, 2021
Foreign Exchange ContractsOther (income) expense$(70)24 
Line item in the Consolidated Balance Sheet in which the hedged item is included 
Carrying Amount of the Hedged Liability

 Cumulative Amount of Fair Value Hedging Adjustment Included in the Carrying Amount of the Hedged Liability
(Dollars in Millions) December 29, 2019 December 30, 2018 December 29, 2019 December 30, 2018
Current Portion of Long-term Debt $
 494
 
 5


51



The following table is the effect of derivatives not designated as hedging instrument for the fiscal years ended December 29, 2019 and December 30, 2018:
     
(Dollars in Millions) Location of Gain /(Loss) Recognized in Income on Derivative 
Gain/(Loss)
Recognized In
Income on Derivative
Derivatives Not Designated as Hedging Instruments   December 29, 2019 December 30, 2018
Foreign Exchange Contracts Other (income) expense (144) (68)


The following table is the effect of net investment hedges for the fiscal years ended January 2, 2022 and January 3, 2021:
Gain/(Loss)
Recognized In
Accumulated OCI
Location of Gain or (Loss) Reclassified from Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income Into IncomeGain/(Loss) Reclassified From
Accumulated OCI
Into Income
(Dollars in Millions)January 2, 2022January 3, 2021January 2, 2022January 3, 2021
Debt$387 (473)Interest (income) expense
— — 
Cross Currency interest rate swaps$548 65 Interest (income) expense— — 

The following table is the effect of net investment hedges for the fiscal years ended December 29, 2019 and December 30, 2018:
  
Gain/(Loss)
Recognized In
Accumulated OCI
 Location of Gain or (Loss) Reclassified from Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income Into Income 
Gain/(Loss) Reclassified From
Accumulated OCI
Into Income
(Dollars in Millions) December 29, 2019 December 30, 2018   December 29, 2019 December 30, 2018
Debt $121
 218
 
Interest (income) expense

 
 
Cross Currency interest rate swaps $488
 150
 Interest (income) expense 
 

The Company holds equity investments with readily determinable fair values and equity investments without readily determinable fair values. The Company measures equity investments that do not have readily determinable fair values at cost minus impairment, if any, plus or minus changes resulting from observable price changes in orderly transactions for the identical or a similar investment of the same issuer.
The following table is a summary of the activity related to equity investments for the fiscal years ended December 29, 2019January 2, 2022 and December 30, 2018:January 3, 2021:
January 3, 2021January 2, 2022
(Dollars in Millions)Carrying Value
Changes in Fair Value Reflected in Net Income (1)
Sales/ Purchases/Other(2)
Carrying ValueNon Current Other Assets
Equity Investments with readily determinable value$1,481 198 205 1,884 1,884 
Equity Investments without readily determinable value$738 394 (632)500 500 

 December 30, 2018     December 29, 2019  December 29, 2019January 3, 2021
(Dollars in Millions) Carrying Value 
Changes in Fair Value Reflected in Net Income (1)
 
Sales/ Purchases/Other(2)
 Carrying Value Non Current Other Assets(Dollars in Millions)Carrying Value
Changes in Fair Value Reflected in Net Income (1)
Sales/ Purchases/Other(2)
Carrying ValueNon Current Other Assets
Equity Investments with readily determinable value $511
 533
 104
 1,148
 1,148
Equity Investments with readily determinable value$1,148 527 (194)1,481 1,481 
          
Equity Investments without readily determinable value $681
 (38) 69
 712
 712
Equity Investments without readily determinable value$712 (55)81 738 738 


  December 31, 2017
     December 30, 2018
  
(Dollars in Millions) Carrying Value 
Changes in Fair Value Reflected in Net Income (1)
 
Sales/ Purchases/Other(2)
 Carrying Value Non Current Other Assets
Equity Investments with readily determinable value $751
 (247) 7
 511
 511
           
Equity Investments without readily determinable value $510
 13
 158
 681
 681


(1) Recorded in Other Income/Expense
(2) Other includes impact of currency



5258




For the fiscal years ended December 29, 2019January 2, 2022 and December 30, 2018January 3, 2021 for equity investments without readily determinable market values, $57$28 million and $54$76 million, respectively, of the changes in fair value reflected in net income were the result of impairments. There were $19offsetting impacts of $422 million and $67$21 million, respectively, of changes in fair value reflected in net income due to changes in observable prices.prices and gains on the disposal of investments. The impact in fiscal 2021 was driven by the gain on disposal of the Grail investment.

Fair value is the exit price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability. Fair value is a market-based measurement determined using assumptions that market participants would use in pricing an asset or liability. In accordance with ASC 820, a three-level hierarchy to prioritize the inputs used in measuring fair value. The levels within the hierarchy are described below with Level 1 having the highest priority and Level 3 having the lowest.

The fair value of a derivative financial instrument (i.e., forward foreign exchange contracts, interest rate contracts) is the aggregation by currency of all future cash flows discounted to its present value at the prevailing market interest rates and subsequently converted to the U.S. Dollar at the current spot foreign exchange rate. The Company does not believe that fair values of these derivative instruments materially differ from the amounts that could be realized upon settlement or maturity, or that the changes in fair value will have a material effect on the Company’s results of operations, cash flows or financial position. The Company also holds equity investments which are classified as Level 1 and debt securities which are classified as Level 2. The Company holds acquisition related contingent liabilities based upon certain regulatory and commercial events, which are classified as Level 3, whose values are determined using discounted cash flow methodologies or similar techniques for which the determination of fair value requires significant judgment or estimations.

The following three levels of inputs are used to measure fair value:
Level 1 — Quoted prices in active markets for identical assets and liabilities.
Level 2 — Significant other observable inputs.
Level 3 — Significant unobservable inputs.

The Company’s significant financial assets and liabilities measured at fair value as of the fiscal year ended December 29, 2019January 2, 2022 and December 30, 2018January 3, 2021 were as follows:
20212020
(Dollars in Millions)Level 1Level 2Level 3Total
Total (1)
Derivatives designated as hedging instruments:     
Assets:     
Forward foreign exchange contracts$— 540 — 540 849 
Interest rate contracts (2)
— 796 — 796 240 
Total$— 1,336 — 1,336 1,089 
Liabilities:     
Forward foreign exchange contracts— 881 — 881 702 
Interest rate contracts (2)
— 979 — 979 1,569 
Total$— 1,860 — 1,860 2,271 
Derivatives not designated as hedging instruments:     
Assets:     
Forward foreign exchange contracts$— 24 — 24 49 
Liabilities:     
Forward foreign exchange contracts— 28 — 28 38 
Available For Sale Other Investments:
Equity investments(3)
1,884 — — 1,884 1,481 
Debt securities(4)
— 19,727 — 19,727 14,042 
Other Liabilities
Contingent Consideration(5)
$533 533 633 
  2019 2018
(Dollars in Millions) Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Total 
Total (1)
Derivatives designated as hedging instruments:  
  
  
  
  
Assets:  
  
  
  
  
Forward foreign exchange contracts $
 209
 
 209
 501
Interest rate contracts (2)(4)
 
 693
 
 693
 161
Total 
 902
 
 902
 662
Liabilities:  
  
  
  
  
Forward foreign exchange contracts 
 426
 
 426
 548
Interest rate contracts (3)(4)
 
 193
 
 193
 292
Total 
 619
 
 619
 840
Derivatives not designated as hedging instruments:  
  
  
  
  
Assets:  
  
  
  
  
Forward foreign exchange contracts 
 23
 
 23
 32
Liabilities:  
  
  
  
  
Forward foreign exchange contracts 
 33
 
 33
 32
Available For Sale Other Investments:          
Equity investments(5)
 1,148
 
 
 1,148
 511
Debt securities(6)
 $
 4,368
 
 4,368
 9,734
Other Liabilities          
Contingent Consideration(7)
     1,715
 1,715
 397

5359




Gross to Net Derivative Reconciliation20212020
(Dollars in Millions)
Total Gross Assets$1,360 1,138 
Credit Support Agreement (CSA)(1,285)(1,107)
Total Net Asset75 31 
Total Gross Liabilities1,888 2,309 
Credit Support Agreement (CSA)(1,855)(2,172)
Total Net Liabilities$33 137 

Gross to Net Derivative Reconciliation 2019 2018
(Dollars in Millions)    
Total Gross Assets $925
 694
Credit Support Agreement (CSA) (841) (423)
Total Net Asset 84
 271
     
Total Gross Liabilities 652
 872
Credit Support Agreement (CSA) (586) (605)
Total Net Liabilities $66
 267
     

Summarized information about changes in liabilities for contingent consideration is as follows:

202120202019
(Dollars in Millions)
Beginning Balance$633 1,715 397 
Changes in estimated fair value (6)
(52)(1,089)151 
Additions— 106 1,246 
Payments(48)(99)(79)
Ending Balance$533 633 1,715 

  201920182017
(Dollars in Millions)    
Beginning Balance 397
600
378
Changes in estimated fair value (8)
 151
(156)87
Additions 1,246
125
160
Payments (79)(172)(25)
Ending Balance 1,715
397
600
     
(1)2020 assets and liabilities are all classified as Level 2 with the exception of equity investments of $1,481 million, which are classified as Level 1 and contingent consideration of $633 million, classified as Level 3.

(2)Includes cross currency interest rate swaps and interest rate swaps.

(3)Classified as non-current other assets.
(4)Classified as cash equivalents and current marketable securities.
(5)Includes $520 million, $594 million and $1,631 million, classified as non-current other liabilities as of January 2, 2022, January 3, 2021 and December 29, 2019, respectively. Includes $13 million, $39 million and $84 million classified as current liabilities as of January 2, 2022, January 3, 2021 and December 29, 2019, respectively.
(6)Ongoing fair value adjustment amounts are recorded primarily in Research and Development expense. The Company recorded a contingent consideration reversal of $1,148 million in 2020 related to the timing of certain developmental milestones associated with the Auris Health acquisition. The reversal of the contingent consideration was recorded in Other income and expense.

(1)
2018 assets and liabilities are all classified as Level 2 with the exception of equity investments of $511 million, which are classified as Level 1 and contingent consideration of $397 million, classified as Level 3.
(2)
Includes $1 million and $6 million of non-current assets for the fiscal years ending December 29, 2019 and December 30, 2018, respectively.
(3)
Includes $3 million of non-current liabilities for the fiscal years ending December 30, 2018.
(4)
Includes cross currency interest rate swaps and interest rate swaps.
(5)
Classified as non-current other assets.
(6)
Classified as cash equivalents and current marketable securities.
(7)
Includes $1,631 million (primarily related to Auris Health), $397 million and $600 million, classified as non-current other liabilities as of December 29, 2019, December 30, 2018 and December 31, 2017 respectively. Includes $84 million classified as current liabilities as of December 29, 2019.
(8)
Amounts are recorded primarily in Research and Development expense.

See Notes 2 and 7 for financial assets and liabilities held at carrying amount on the Consolidated Balance Sheet.


5460



7.Borrowings


7.Borrowings
The components of long-term debt are as follows:
(Dollars in Millions)2021 Effective Rate % 2020 Effective Rate %
3.55% Notes due 2021$— — %$450 3.67 %
2.45% Notes due 2021— — 350 2.48 
1.65% Notes due 2021— — 999 1.65 
0.250% Notes due 2022 (1B Euro 1.1311)(2)/(1B Euro 1.2281)(3)

1,131 (2)0.26 1,227 (3)0.26 
2.25% Notes due 20221,000 2.31 999 2.31 
6.73% Debentures due 2023250  6.73  250  6.73 
3.375% Notes due 2023802 3.18 803 3.17 
2.05% Notes due 2023499 2.09 499 2.09 
0.650% Notes due 2024
(750MM Euro 1.1311)(2)/(750MM Euro 1.2281)(3)
847 (2)0.68 919 (3)0.68 
5.50% Notes due 2024
(500MM 1.3485 GBP )(2)/(500MM GBP 1.3654)(3)
672 (2)6.75  679 (3)6.75 
2.625% Notes due 2025749 2.63 748 2.63 
0.55% Notes due 2025983 0.57 996 0.57 
2.45% Notes due 20261,995 2.47 1,994 2.47 
2.95% Notes due 2027978 2.96 997 2.96 
0.95% Notes due 20271,478 0.96 1,494 0.96 
1.150% Notes due 2028 (750MM Euro 1.1311)(2)/(750MM Euro 1.2281)(3)
843 (2)1.21 915 (3)1.21 
2.90% Notes due 20281,495 2.91 1,495 2.91 
6.95% Notes due 2029298  7.14  297  7.14 
1.30% Notes due 20301,723 1.30 1,743 1.30 
4.95% Debentures due 2033498  4.95  498  4.95 
4.375% Notes due 2033854 4.24 855 4.24 
1.650% Notes due 2035 (1.5B Euro 1.1311)(2)/(1.5B Euro 1.2281)(3)
1,683 (2)1.68 1,827 (3)1.68 
3.55% Notes due 2036974 3.59 989 3.59 
5.95% Notes due 2037993  5.99  992  5.99 
3.625% Notes due 20371,475 3.64 1,488 3.64 
5.85% Debentures due 2038696  5.85  696  5.85 
3.400% Notes due 2038992 3.42 991 3.42 
4.50% Debentures due 2040540  4.63  539  4.63 
2.10% Notes due 2040974 2.14 986 2.14 
4.85% Notes due 2041297 4.89 297 4.89 
4.50% Notes due 2043496 4.52 496 4.52 
3.70% Notes due 20461,975 3.74 1,974 3.74 
3.75% Notes due 2047971 3.76 991 3.76 
3.500% Notes due 2048743 3.52 742 3.52 
2.250% Notes due 2050983 2.29 984 2.29 
2.450% Notes due 20601,222 2.49 1,228 2.49 
Other —   — 
Subtotal32,116 (4)2.89 %(1)34,434 (4)2.85 %(1)
Less current portion2,131    1,799   
Total long-term debt$29,985    $32,635   
(Dollars in Millions) 2019
  
Effective Rate %
  
2018
  
Effective Rate % 
4.75% Notes due 2019 (1B Euro 1.1096)(2)/(1B Euro 1.14)(3)
 $
 
  
1,139
(2) 
5.83 
1.875% Notes due 2019 
 
 494
 1.93 
0.89% Notes due 2019 
 
 300
 1.32 
1.125% Notes due 2019 
 
 699
 1.13 
3% Zero Coupon Convertible Subordinated Debentures due 2020 51
  
3.00
  
51
  
3.00 
2.95% Debentures due 2020 549
  
3.15
  
548
  
3.15 
1.950% Notes due 2020 500
 1.99
 499
 1.99 
3.55% Notes due 2021 449
 3.67
 449
 3.67 
2.45% Notes due 2021 349
 2.48
 349
 2.48 
1.65% Notes due 2021 999
 1.65
 998
 1.65 
0.250% Notes due 2022 (1B Euro 1.1096)(2)/(1B Euro 1.14)(3)

 1,108
(2) 
0.26
 1,137
(3) 
0.26 
2.25% Notes due 2022 998
 2.31
 996
 2.31 
6.73% Debentures due 2023 250
  
6.73
  
250
  
6.73 
3.375% Notes due 2023 804
 3.17
 805
 3.17 
2.05% Notes due 2023 498
 2.09
 498
 2.09 
0.650% Notes due 2024 (750MM Euro 1.1096)(2)/(750MM Euro 1.14)(3)
 829
(2) 
0.68
 851
(3) 
0.68 
5.50% Notes due 2024 (500MM GBP 1.2987)(2)/(500MM GBP 1.2636)(3)
 645
(2) 
6.75
  
627
(3) 
6.75 
2.625% Notes due 2025 748
 2.63
 748
 2.63 
2.45% Notes due 2026 1,993
 2.47
 1,992
 2.47 
2.95% Notes due 2027 996
 2.96
 996
 2.96 
1.150% Notes due 2028 (750MM Euro 1.1096)(2)/(750MM Euro 1.14)(3)
 825
(2) 
1.21
 847
(3) 
1.21 
2.900% Notes due 2028 1,494
 2.91
 1,493
 2.91 
6.95% Notes due 2029 297
  
7.14
  
297
  
7.14 
4.95% Debentures due 2033 498
  
4.95
  
498
  
4.95 
4.375% Notes due 2033 855
 4.24
 856
 4.24 
1.650% Notes due 2035 (1.5B Euro 1.1096)(2)/(1.5B Euro 1.14)(3)
 1,649
(2) 
1.68
 1,693
(3) 
1.68 
3.55% Notes due 2036 989
 3.59
 988
 3.59 
5.95% Notes due 2037 992
  
5.99
  
991
  
5.99 
3.625% Notes due 2037 1,487
 3.64
 1,486
 3.64 
5.85% Debentures due 2038 696
  
5.85
  
696
  
5.85 
3.400% Notes due 2038 991
 3.42
 990
 3.42 
4.50% Debentures due 2040 539
  
4.63
  
538
  
4.63 
4.85% Notes due 2041 297
 4.89
 297
 4.89 
4.50% Notes due 2043 495
 4.52
 495
 4.52 
3.70% Notes due 2046 1,973
 3.74
 1,972
 3.74 
3.75% Notes due 2047 991
 3.76
 991
 3.76 
3.500% Notes due 2048 742
 3.52
 742
 3.52 
Other 18
  

  
24
  
 

5561



(1)Weighted average effective rate.
Subtotal 27,594
(4) 
3.19%
(1) 
30,320
(4) 
3.19
(1 
) 
Less current portion 1,100
  
 
  
2,636
  
  
Total long-term debt $26,494
  
 
  
27,684
  
  
(2)Translation rate at January 2, 2022.
(3)Translation rate at January 3, 2021.
(4)The excess of the fair value over the carrying value of debt was $3.2 billion at the end of fiscal year 2021 and $5.4 billion at the end of fiscal year 2020.

(1)
Weighted average effective rate.
(2)
Translation rate at December 29, 2019.
(3)
Translation rate at December 30, 2018.
(4)
The excess of the fair value over the carrying value of debt was $3.0 billion in 2019 and $0.3 billion in 2018.

Fair value of the long-term debt was estimated using market prices, which were corroborated by quoted broker prices and significant other observable inputs.
The Company has access to substantial sources of funds at numerous banks worldwide. In September 2019,2021, the Company secured a new 364-day Credit Facility. Total credit available to the Company approximates $10 billion, which expires on September 10, 2020.8, 2022. Interest charged on borrowings under the credit line agreementsagreement is based on either bids provided by banks, the prime rate, London Interbank Offered Rates (LIBOR)Term SOFR Reference Rate or other applicable market raterates as allowed under the terms of the agreement, plus applicable margins. Commitment fees under the agreements are not material.
Throughout 2019,fiscal years 2021 and 2020, the Company continued to have access to liquidity through the commercial paper market. Short-term borrowings and the current portion of long-term debt amounted to approximately $1.2$3.8 billion and $2.6 billion at the end of 2019, of which $1.1 billion is the current portion of the long-term debt,fiscal years 2021 and the remainder principally represents local borrowing by international subsidiaries.
Throughout 2018, the Company continued to have access to liquidity through the commercial paper market. Short-term borrowings and the current portion of long-term debt amounted to approximately $2.8 billion at the end of 2018, of which $2.6 billion is the2020, respectively. The current portion of the long term debt was $2.1 billion and $1.8 billion in 2021 and 2020, respectively, and the remainder principally representsis commercial paper and local borrowing by international subsidiaries.
The current debt balance as of January 2, 2022 includes $1.6 billion of commercial paper which has a weighted average interest rate of 0.11% and a weighted average maturity of approximately three months.

Aggregate maturities of long-term debt obligations commencing in 20202022 are:
(Dollars in Millions)
20222023202420252026After 2026
$2,1311,5511,5181,7321,99523,189
(Dollars in Millions)        
2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 After 2024
$1,100 1,797 2,106 1,552 1,474 19,565


8.Income Taxes
8.Income Taxes
The provision for taxes on income consists of:
(Dollars in Millions)202120202019
Currently payable:
U.S. taxes$1,525 1,026 1,941 
International taxes2,452 1,898 2,744 
Total currently payable3,977 2,924 4,685 
Deferred:
U.S. taxes583 (76)(814)
International taxes(2,662)(1,065)(1,662)
Total deferred(2,079)(1,141)(2,476)
Provision for taxes on income$1,898 1,783 2,209 
(Dollars in Millions) 2019 2018 2017
Currently payable:      
U.S. taxes $1,941
 1,284
 12,095
International taxes 2,744
 2,434
 1,872
Total currently payable 4,685
 3,718
 13,967
Deferred:      
U.S. taxes (814) 1,210
(1) 
(1,956)
International taxes (1,662) (2,226) 4,362
Total deferred (2,476) (1,016) 2,406
Provision for taxes on income $2,209
 2,702
 16,373

(1)Includes $1.4 billion of deferred tax expense for the adoption of the deferred method to account for GILTI.









5662



A comparison of income tax expense at the U.S. statutory rate of 21% in 2019fiscal years 2021, 2020 and 2018 and 35% in 2017,2019, to the Company’s effective tax rate is as follows:
(Dollars in Millions)202120202019
U.S. $6,110 4,312 3,543 
International16,666 12,185 13,785 
Earnings before taxes on income:$22,776 16,497 17,328 
Tax rates:
U.S. statutory rate21.0 %21.0 21.0 
International operations (1)
(16.4)(9.9)(5.9)
U.S. taxes on international income (2)
6.7 2.7 1.8 
Tax benefits from loss on capital assets(1.3)(1.2)(0.3)
Tax benefits on share-based compensation(1.0)(1.5)(0.5)
TCJA and related impacts(0.5)0.7 (3.9)(3)
All other(0.2)(1.0)0.5 
Effective Rate8.3 %10.8 12.7 
(Dollars in Millions) 2019 2018 2017 
U.S.  $3,543
 5,575
 4,865
 
International 13,785
 12,424
 12,808
 
Earnings before taxes on income: $17,328
 17,999
 17,673
 
Tax rates:       
U.S. statutory rate 21.0 % 21.0
 35.0
 
International operations (1)
 (5.9) (3.7) (12.8) 
U.S. taxes on international income (2)
 1.8
 1.4
 0.7
 
Tax benefits on share-based compensation (0.5) (1.5) (2.1) 
All other 0.2
 (0.3) (1.5) 
TCJA and related impacts (3.9)
(3) 
(1.9)
(3) 
73.3
(4) 
Effective Rate 12.7 % 15.0
 92.6
 


(1) For all periods presented the Company has subsidiaries operating in Puerto Rico under various tax incentives. International operations reflects the impacts of operations in jurisdictions with statutory tax rates different than the U.S., particularly Ireland, Switzerland and Puerto Rico, which is a favorable impact on the effective tax rate as compared with the U.S. statutory rate. The 2017 amount also includes2021 amounts include the reorganization of international subsidiaries; the 2020 and 2019 amounts include the impact of the new tax cost related to the revaluationlegislation enactment in Switzerland, both of deferred tax balances related to the change in the Belgian statutory tax rate increasing the tax provision by approximately 3.4%.which are further described below.
(2) Includes the impact of the GILTI tax, the Foreign-Derived Intangible Income deduction and other foreign income that is taxable under the U.S. tax code. The 2021 amounts include the reorganization of international subsidiaries; the 2020 and 2019 amounts include the impact of the new tax legislation enactment in Switzerland, both of which is further described below.
(3) Represents impact of adjustments to balances originally recorded as part of the 2017 TCJA provisional tax charge. Further information provided below.
(4) Includes U.S. state and local taxes provisionally recorded as part TCJA provisional charge which was approximately 0.6% of the total effective tax rate.

The 2019fiscal year 2021 tax rate decreased by 2.3%2.5% compared to the fiscal year 20182020 tax rate, which was primarily driven by the following items. In fiscal year 2021, the Company reorganized the ownership structure of certain wholly-owned international subsidiaries. As part of this reorganization, the Company increased the tax basis of certain assets to fair value in accordance with applicable local regulations. The net impact of this restructuring was approximately $0.6 billion net benefit or 2.7% benefit to the Company’s annual effective tax rate, comprised of the following items:

approximately $2.3 billion of local deferred tax assets to record the remeasurement of the tax basis of these assets to fair value, this benefit has been reflected as “International Operations” on the Company’s effective tax rate reconciliation.
approximately $1.7 billion of U.S. deferred tax expense relating to the GILTI deferred tax liability resulting from the remeasurement of these deferred tax assets. This expense has been reflected as “U.S. tax on international income” on the Company’s effective tax rate reconciliation.

Also, in the fiscal fourth quarter of 2021, the Company recognized a loss on certain U.S. affiliates related to the previously impaired book value of certain intangibles, which reduced the 2021 tax rate by approximately 1.3% which is reflected as a “Tax benefits from loss on capital assets” on the effective tax rate reconciliation. Additionally other fiscal 2021 impacts to the rate were primarily driven by litigation and acquisition related items as follows:

the Company accrued additional legal expenses, of approximately $1.6 billion for talc at an effective tax rate of 23.5% and $0.8 billion for Risperdal settlements at an effective tax rate of 16.4% (See Note 19 to the Consolidated Financial Statements for more details).
the Company recorded a partial IPR&D charge of $0.9 billion for the Ottava intangible asset (acquired with the Auris Health acquisition in 2019) at an effective rate of 22.4% (See Notes 5 and 18 to the Consolidated Financial Statements for more details).

The fiscal year 2020 tax rate decreased by 1.9% compared to the fiscal year 2019 tax rate. which was primarily driven by the following items. In fiscal year 2019, Switzerland enacted the Federal Act on Tax Reform and AHV Financing (TRAF) which became effective on January 1, 2020. The Federal transitional provisions of TRAF allow companies, under certain conditions, to adjust the tax basis in certain assets to fair value (i.e., “step-up”) to be depreciated and amortized resulting in an incremental Swiss tax deduction over the transitional period.

TRAF also provides for parameters which enable the Swiss cantons to establish localized tax rates and regulations for companies. The new cantonal tax parameters include favorable tax benefits for patents and additional research and development
63


tax deductions. The cantonal transitional provisions of TRAF allowed companies to elect either 1) tax basis step-up similar to the Federal transition benefit or 2) alternative statutory tax rate for a period not to exceed 5 years. The Company currently has operations located in various Swiss cantons. During the fiscal year 2019, as described in further detail below, the Company recorded the impacts of the TRAF that were enacted in that period.

During the fiscal year 2020, the final canton where the Company maintains significant operations enacted TRAF legislation. Additionally, the Company received rulings from the Swiss Federal and cantonal tax authorities in the remaining jurisdictions where it has significant operations. These rulings resulted in the Company revising its estimate on the tax basis adjustment (i.e., “step-up”) for its assets and as a result, the Company recorded additional deferred tax benefits in 2020. The Company recognized a net benefit in the fiscal year 2020 for Swiss Tax Reform of approximately $0.4 billion or 2.6% benefit to the Company’s annual effective tax rate, comprised of the following items:

approximately $0.3 billion tax benefit relating to the remeasurement of Swiss deferred tax assets and liabilities for the change in the Federal and cantonal tax rates, where enactment occurred in the fiscal year 2020; this benefit has been reflected as “International Operations” on the Company’s effective tax rate reconciliation.
a $450 million deferred tax asset related to the estimated value of a Federal tax basis step-up of the Company’s Swiss subsidiaries’ assets as described above; this benefit has been reflected as “International Operations” on the Company’s effective tax rate reconciliation.
approximately $0.3 billion of U.S. deferred tax expense relating to the GILTI deferred tax liability resulting from the remeasurement of the Swiss deferred tax assets and liabilities in the fiscal year 2020. This benefit has been reflected as “U.S. tax on international income” on the Company’s effective tax rate reconciliation.

The Company does not expect to receive future rulings regarding the transitional provisions of TRAF.

Also, in the fiscal year 2020, the Company recognized a capital loss on certain U.S. affiliates related to the previously impaired book value of certain intangibles, which reduced the 2020 tax rate by approximately 1.2% which is reflected as a “Tax benefits from loss on capital assets” on the effective tax rate reconciliation. In addition, to in the fiscal year 2020, the Company had lower income in higher tax jurisdictions, primarily driven by:

the impact of Swissthe accrual of litigation costs related to talc for $4.0 billion which reduced the U.S. earnings before taxes at an effective tax reform discussedrate of 23.5%;
the accrual of additional legal costs, including an additional $1.0 billion associated with a revised agreement in more detail below,principle to settle opioid litigation at an effective tax rate of 21.4%

The Company also reduced the primary driverscontingent consideration liability related to the Auris Health acquisition (see Note 18) and reversed of some of its unrecognized tax benefits due to the net decrease were as follows:completion of several years of tax examinations in certain jurisdictions during the fiscal year 2020.

TheIn fiscal year 2019, the Company reorganized the ownership structure of certain wholly-owned international subsidiaries in the fiscal fourth quarter of 2019, which resulted in a reduction of certain withholding and local taxes that it had previously recognized as part of the provisional Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (TCJA) tax charge in the fiscal year 2017 and finalized in the fiscal year 2018. Following the completion of this restructuring and approval by the applicable local authorities, the Company reversed a deferred tax liability of $0.6 billion and a related deferred tax asset of $0.2 billion for U.S. foreign tax credits, for a net deferred tax benefit of $0.4 billion decreasing the annual effective tax rate by 2.2%. This benefit has been reflected as “TCJA and related impacts” on the Company’s effective tax rate reconciliation. The following items also impacted the fiscal year 2019 effective tax rate:
The impact of the agreement in principle to settle opioid litigation for $4 billion (see Note 2119 to the Consolidated Financial Statements) which reduced the U.S. earnings before taxes at an effective tax rate of 23.5% and decreased the Company’s annual effective tax rate by approximately 2.1%.
In December of fiscal year 2019, the U.S. Treasury issued final foreign tax credit regulations, which resulted in the Company revising the amount of foreign tax credits that were initially recorded in the fiscal year 2017 as part of the provisional TCJA tax charge. As a result, the Company recorded an increased deferred tax asset related to these foreign tax credits of approximately $0.3 billion or 1.7% to the annual effective tax rate. This benefit has been reflected as “TCJA and related impacts” on the Company’s effective tax rate reconciliation.
The Company reassessed its uncertain tax positions related to the current IRS audit and increased its unrecognized tax benefit by $0.3 billion liability which increased the annual effective tax rate by approximately 1.5% (see section on Unrecognized Tax Benefits for additional information). As these positions were related to uncertain tax regarding international transfer pricing, this expense has been classified as “International Operations” on the Company’s effective tax rate reconciliation. Subsequent to December 29, 2019, the Company received and agreed to Notices of Proposed Adjustments (NOPAs) from the IRS. The Company believes it is adequately reserved for potential exposures.
There were several one-time tax impacts that resulted in a cumulative net tax benefit to the 2018 annual effective tax rate of 1.2%. These items included the LifeScan divestiture, the adjustment to the 2017 provisional TCJA tax charge and the acceleration of certain tax deductions as part of the 2017 tax return.
More income in higher tax jurisdictions relative to lower tax jurisdictions as compared to 2018.

On September 28, 2018 the Swiss Parliament approved the Federal Act on Tax Reform and AHV Financing (TRAF). On May 19, 2019 a public referendum was held in Switzerland that approved the federal reform proposals. In the fiscal third quarter of 2019, the Swiss Federal Council enacted TRAF which became effective on January 1, 2020. The Federal transitional provisions

5764



of TRAF allow companies, under certain conditions, to adjust their tax basis adjustments to fair value (i.e., “step-up”) which is usedAs described above for tax depreciation and amortization purposes resulting in a deduction over the transitional period. The subsequent adjustment to the Company’s asset tax basis will require review and approval by the tax authorities.
TRAF also provides for parameters which enable the Swiss cantons to establish localized tax rates and regulations for companies. The new cantonal tax parameters include favorable tax benefits for patents and additional research and development tax deductions. The cantonal transitional provisions of TRAF are also expected to allow companies to elect either 1) tax basis step-up similar tolegislation, in the Federal transition benefit or 2) alternative statutory tax rate for a period not to exceed 5 years. The Company currently has operations located in various Swiss cantons and enactment may not be uniform in bothfiscal year 2019, the substantive nature of the legislation and the timing of enactment.
The Company recorded a net tax expense of $0.1 billion which increased the effective tax rate for the fiscal year 2019 by approximately 0.6%. This net tax expense related to federal and certain cantonal enactments in the fiscal year 2019 consisting of the following provisions:

approximately $0.6 billion tax expense relating to the remeasurement of Swiss deferred tax assets and liabilities for the change in the Federal and cantonal tax rates, where enactment occurred by December 29, 2019; this expense has been reflected as “International Operations” on the Company’s effective tax rate reconciliation.
a $0.9 billion deferred tax asset related to the estimated value of a Federal tax basis step-up of the Company’s Swiss subsidiaries’ assets; this benefit has been reflected as “International Operations” on the Company’s effective tax rate reconciliation.
approximately $450 million of U.S. deferred tax expense relating to the GILTI deferred tax liability resulting from the remeasurement of the Swiss deferred tax assets and liabilities and the new deferred tax asset for the Federal step-up. thisThis benefit has been reflected as “U.S. tax on international income” on the Company’s effective tax rate reconciliation.

In the fiscal fourth quarter of 2019, the Swiss Federal Tax Administration issued authoritative guidance that required the Company to decrease the estimated value of the Federal tax basis step-up by approximately $0.3 billion from the determination made in the fiscal third quarter of 2019. Further authoritative guidance from the relevant Swiss tax authorities may be issued in the futureTemporary differences and additional revisions may be required in the fiscal period that they are issued.
The Company is currently assessing and applying for approval for the elective transition provisions in several cantons which includes discussions with local tax authorities on the application of the new law. The Company has recorded an estimated impact of the transitional provisions based on the best available information for cantons where enactment has occurred but the Company has not yet received a final tax ruling.
As of December 29, 2019, the one canton where the Company maintains significant operations has not yet enacted TRAF legislation and the amounts recorded in the fiscal year 2019 do not include estimates for unenacted legislation. On February 9, 2020 a public referendum on the legislative change was held in this canton and the legislation was approved by the voters; formal enactment is expected in the fiscal first half of 2020. The Company has not yet elected the transitional provision in this canton. However, the net financial benefit is estimated to be between $0.2 billion and $0.5 billion in the fiscal first half of 2020.
U.S. Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (TCJA) (2018 and 2017)
In the fiscal year 2017, the United States enacted into law new U.S. tax legislation, the TCJA. This law included provisions for a comprehensive overhaul of the corporate income tax code, including a reduction of the statutory corporate tax rate from 35% to 21%, effective on January 1, 2018. This legislation also eliminated or reduced certain corporate income tax deductions as well as introduced new provisions that taxed certain foreign income not previously taxed by the United States. The TCJA also included a provision for a tax on all previously undistributed earnings of U.S. companies located in foreign jurisdictions. Undistributed earnings in the form of cash and cash equivalents were taxed at a rate of 15.5% and all other earnings were taxed at a rate of 8.0%. This tax is payable over 8 years and will not accrue interest. These payments began in 2018 and will continue through 2025. The remaining balancecarryforwards at the end of the fiscal years 2021 and 2020 were as follows:
2021 Deferred Tax
2020 Deferred Tax(1)
(Dollars in Millions)AssetLiabilityAssetLiability
Employee related obligations$1,244 2,434 
Stock based compensation679 627 
Depreciation of property, plant and equipment(876)(823)
Goodwill and intangibles(2,659)(2)(5,023)
R&D capitalized for tax1,664 1,517 
Reserves & liabilities2,882 3,466 
Income reported for tax purposes2,566 1,777 
Net realizable operating loss carryforward1,073 990 
Undistributed foreign earnings1,015 (1,461)812 (1,435)
Global intangible low-taxed income(4,853)(3,606)
Miscellaneous international1,006 (39)854 (211)
Miscellaneous U.S. 495 (59)
Total deferred income taxes$12,624 (9,888)12,477 (11,157)
(1)Certain prior year 2019 was approximately $8.2 billion, of which $7.7 billionamounts have been reclassified to conform to current year presentation
(2)Amount is classified as noncurrent and reflected as “Long-term taxes payable” on the Company’s balance sheet. The balance of this account is related to receivables from tax authorities not expected to be received in the next 12 months.

In the fourth quarter of 2017, the Company recorded a provisional tax cost of approximately $13.0 billion which consisted primarilyinclusive of the following components:

a $10.1 billion charge on previously undistributed foreign earnings as of December 31, 2017
a $4.5 billion deferred tax liability for foreign local and withholding taxes, offset by a $1.1$2.3 billion deferred tax asset for U.S. foreign tax credits, for repatriation of substantially all those earnings

58



a $0.6 billion tax benefit relating to the remeasurement of U.S. deferred tax assets and liabilities and the impactestablished as part of the TCJA on unrecognized tax benefits
a $0.1 billion charge for U.S. state and local taxes on the repatriation of these foreign earnings

In the fiscal year 2018, the Company completed its full assessment and finalized the accounting for the impact of the TCJA. The Company recorded net adjustments to the above components of the provisional charge of approximately $0.2 billion. These revisions were based on updated estimates and additional analysis by management as well as applying interpretative guidance issued by the U.S. Department of Treasury to the facts and circumstances that existed as of the TCJA enactment date. This charge was primarily related to additional deferred tax liabilities for foreign local and withholding taxes for the remaining balance of undistributed foreign earnings as of December 31, 2017 that were not provided for in the 2017 provisional charge.

The TCJA also includes provisions for a tax on GILTI. GILTI is described as the excess of a U.S. shareholder’s total net foreign income over a deemed return on tangible assets, as provided by the TCJA. In the fiscal year 2018, the Company elected to treat GILTI as a period expense under the deferred method and recorded a deferred tax cost of approximately $1.4 billion in the fiscal year 2018 related to facts and circumstances that existed on the date of TCJA enactment. See Note 1 for further information regarding income taxes accounting policies.
During 2018, the Company reorganized the ownership structure of certain foreignwholly-owned international subsidiaries, which resulted in a reduction of certain foreign withholding taxes that it had recognized as part of the provisional TCJA tax charge in the fourth quarter of 2017. Following the completion of this restructuring and as a result of clarification by Swiss tax authorities regarding the applicability of withholding tax to repatriation of certain earnings, the Company reversed a deferred tax liability of $2.8 billion and a related deferred tax asset of $0.9 billion for U.S. foreign tax credits, for a net deferred tax benefit of $1.9 billion. This benefit has been reflected as “TCJA and related impacts” on the Company’s effective tax rate reconciliation.previously described.

The 2018 effective tax rate decreased by 77.6% compared to 2017. The 2017 effective tax rate was primarily driven by the approximately $13 billion provisional tax charge recorded in the fourth quarter of 2017 and the impact of a Belgian statutory tax rate change which increased the 2017 effective rate by 3.4%. Additional drivers of the 2018 annual effective tax were:
the reduction of the U.S. statutory corporate tax rate including the effects of tax elections which resulted in the acceleration of certain deductions into the 2017 tax return. The impact of these accelerated deductions decreased the annual effective tax rate by approximately 1.7%
the impact of the adjustments to the 2017 provisional TCJA charge, including both Staff Accounting Bulletin (SAB) 118 adjustments and the internal restructuring, decreased the effective tax rate by approximately 1.9%
GILTI tax which increased the annual effective tax rate by approximately 1.6%, which excludes the impact of the SAB 118 adjustment for the adoption of the deferred method for GILTI
tax benefits received from stock-based compensation during fiscal 2018 and 2017, reduced the effective tax rate by 1.5% and 2.0%, respectively
in the fourth quarter of 2018, the Company completed the divestiture of its LifeScan business (See Note 20 to the Consolidated Financial Statements), which increased the Company's annual effective tax rate by approximately 0.8%
more income in higher tax jurisdictions relative to lower tax jurisdictions as compared to 2017





















59






Temporary differences and carryforwards for 2019 and 2018 were as follows:
  2019 Deferred Tax 2018 Deferred Tax
(Dollars in Millions) Asset Liability Asset Liability
Employee related obligations $2,393
 

 2,398
 

Stock based compensation 546
 

 639
 

Depreciation & amortization 1,122
 

 1,784
 

Non-deductible intangibles 

 (5,752) 

 (5,967)
International R&D capitalized for tax 1,189
 

 1,282
 

Reserves & liabilities 2,384
 

 1,647
 

Income reported for tax purposes 1,605
 

 1,104
 

Net operating loss carryforward international 838
 

 786
 

Undistributed foreign earnings 765
 (1,289) 693
 (2,240)
Global intangible low-taxed income   (2,965)   (2,971)
Miscellaneous international 696
 (81) 603
 (93)
Miscellaneous U.S.  410
 

 469
 

Total deferred income taxes $11,948
 (10,087) 11,405
 (11,271)

The Company has wholly-owned international subsidiaries that have cumulative net losses. The Company believes that it is more likely than not that these subsidiaries will generate future taxable income sufficient to utilize these deferred tax assets. However, in certain jurisdictions, valuation allowances have been recorded against deferred tax assets for loss carryforwards that are not more likely than not to be realized. Such valuation allowances are not material.
The following table summarizes the activity related to unrecognized tax benefits:
(Dollars in Millions)202120202019
Beginning of year$3,373 3,853 3,326 
Increases related to current year tax positions242 265 249 
Increases related to prior period tax positions23 668 408 
Decreases related to prior period tax positions(128)(551)(105)
Settlements(187)(839)(9)
Lapse of statute of limitations(23)(16)
End of year$3,323 3,373 3,853 


65

(Dollars in Millions) 2019 2018 2017 
Beginning of year $3,326
 3,151
 3,041
 
Increases related to current year tax positions 249
 242
 332
 
Increases related to prior period tax positions 408
 145
 232
 
Decreases related to prior period tax positions (105) (137) (416)(1)
Settlements (9) (40) (2) 
Lapse of statute of limitations (16) (35) (36) 
End of year $3,853
 3,326
 3,151
 
(1) In 2017, $347 million of this decrease is related to the TCJA.

The unrecognized tax benefits of $3.9$3.3 billion at December 29, 2019,January 2, 2022, if recognized, would affect the Company’s annual effective tax rate. The Company conducts business and files tax returns in numerous countries and currently has tax audits in progress with a number of tax authorities. With respect to the United States, the Internal Revenue Service (IRS)IRS has completed its audit for the tax years through 20092012 and is currently auditing the tax years 2010-2012. The Company currently expects completion of this audit and settlement of the related tax liabilities in2013 through 2016. In the fiscal year 2020. As of the December 29, 2019, the Company has classified unrecognized tax benefits and related interest of approximately $0.9 billion as a current liability on the “Accrued taxes on Income” line of the Consolidated Balance Sheet. This is the amount expected to be paid over the next 12 months with respect to the IRS audit. Subsequent to December 29, 2019,2020, the Company made a paymentits final payments for approximately $0.6approximately$0.7 billion to the U.S. Treasury related to the estimatedfinal settlement of 2010-2012 tax audit liability in anticipation of the final settlement later in fiscal 2020. The completion of this tax audit may result in additional adjustments to the Company’s unrecognized tax benefit liability.

In other major jurisdictions where the Company conducts business, the years that remain open to tax audit go back to the year 2006.2008. The Company believes it is possible that tax audits may be completed over the next twelve months by taxing authorities in some jurisdictions outside of the United States. However, the Company is not able to provide a reasonably reliable estimate of the timing of any other future tax payments relating to uncertain tax positions.

The Company classifies liabilities for unrecognized tax benefits and related interest and penalties as long-term liabilities, except as previously noted on amounts related to the current United States IRS audit. Interest expense and penalties related to

60



unrecognized tax benefits are classified as income tax expense. The Company recognized after tax interest expense of $44 million, $32 million and $50 million $53 millionin fiscal years 2021, 2020 and $60 million in 2019, 2018 and 2017, respectively. The total amount of accrued interest was $559$512 million and $503$468 million in 2019fiscal years 2021 and 2018,2020, respectively.


9.Employee Related Obligations
9.Employee Related Obligations
At the end of 2019fiscal 2021 and 2018,fiscal 2020, employee related obligations recorded on the Consolidated Balance Sheets were:
(Dollars in Millions)20212020
Pension benefits$4,088 5,761 
Postretirement benefits2,069 2,229 
Postemployment benefits3,117 3,078 
Deferred compensation181 250 
Total employee obligations9,455 11,318 
Less current benefits payable557 547 
Employee related obligations — non-current$8,898 10,771 
(Dollars in Millions) 2019 2018
Pension benefits $5,538
 5,327
Postretirement benefits 2,297
 2,283
Postemployment benefits 3,004
 2,330
Deferred compensation 338
 410
Total employee obligations 11,177
 10,350
Less current benefits payable 514
 399
Employee related obligations — non-current $10,663
 9,951

Prepaid employee related obligations of $551$4,436 million and $475$656 million for 20192021 and 2018,2020, respectively, are included in Other assets on the Consolidated Balance Sheets.


10.Pensions and Other Benefit Plans66



10.Pensions and Other Benefit Plans

The Company sponsors various retirement and pension plans, including defined benefit, defined contribution and termination indemnity plans, which cover most employees worldwide. The Company also provides post-retirement benefits, primarily health care,healthcare, to all eligible U.S. retired employees and their dependents.

Many international employees are covered by government-sponsored programs and the cost to the Company is not significant.
Retirement plan
In the U.S, non-union pension benefits for employees hired before January 1, 2015 are primarily based on the employee’s compensation during the last three to five years before retirement and the number of years of service. In 2014, the Company announced that theservice (the Final Average Pay formula). U.S. Defined Benefit Plan was amended to adopt a new benefit formula, effectivepension benefits for employees hired on or after January 1, 2015. The benefits2014, are calculated using a newdifferent formula based on employee compensation over total years of service.service (the Retirement Value formula).

In January 2021, the Company announced that, effective on January 1, 2026, all eligible U.S. non-union employees,
regardless of hire date, will earn benefits under the Retirement Value formula. This amendment does not affect the benefits
accrued under the Final Average Pay formula for service before January 1, 2026. The impact of this change decreases the
Projected Benefit Obligation as of January 3, 2021 by approximately $1.8 billion and is included in the “Amendments” line in the Change in Benefit Obligation.

International subsidiaries have plans under which funds are deposited with trustees, annuities are purchased under group contracts, or reserves are provided.

The Company does not typically fund retiree health carehealthcare benefits in advance but may do so at its discretion. The Company alsoand has the right to modify these plans in the future.

In 20192021 and 20182020 the Company used December 31, 20192021 and December 31, 2018,2020, respectively, as the measurement date for all U.S. and international retirement and other benefit plans.


Net periodic benefit costs for the Company’s defined benefit retirement plans and other benefit plans for 2019, 20182021, 2020 and 20172019 include the following components:
 Retirement PlansOther Benefit Plans
(Dollars in Millions)202120202019202120202019
Service cost$1,421 1,380 1,163 309 287 274 
Interest cost770 955 1,096 81 133 185 
Expected return on plan assets(2,645)(2,461)(2,322)(7)(7)(6)
Amortization of prior service cost(181)(31)(31)(31)
Recognized actuarial losses (gains)1,257 891 579 151 142 129 
Curtailments and settlements23 73 — — — 
Net periodic benefit cost$623 790 593 503 524 551 
  Retirement Plans Other Benefit Plans
(Dollars in Millions) 2019 2018 2017 2019 2018 2017
Service cost $1,163
 1,283
 1,080
 274
 269
 247
Interest cost 1,096
 996
 927
 185
 148
 159
Expected return on plan assets (2,322) (2,212) (2,041) (6) (7) (6)
Amortization of prior service cost (credit) 4
 3
 2
 (31) (31) (30)
Recognized actuarial losses 579
 852
 609
 129
 123
 138
Curtailments and settlements 73
 1
 17
 
 
 
Net periodic benefit cost $593
 923
 594
 551
 502
 508




Amounts expected to be recognized inThe service cost component of net periodic benefit cost is presented in the coming year forsame line items on the Company’s definedConsolidated Statement of Earnings where other employee compensation costs are reported, including Cost of products sold, Research and development expense, and Selling, marketing and administrative expenses. All other components of net periodic benefit retirement plans and other post-retirement plans:cost are presented as part of Other (income) expense, net on the Consolidated Statement of Earnings.

61



(Dollars in Millions)
Amortization of net transition obligation$
Amortization of net actuarial losses1,022
Amortization of prior service credit29


Unrecognized gains and losses for the U.S. pension plans are amortized over the average remaining future service for each plan. For plans with no active employees, they are amortized over the average life expectancy. The amortization of gains and losses for the other U.S. benefit plans is determined by using a 10% corridor of the greater of the market value of assets or the accumulated postretirement benefit obligation. Total unamortized gains and losses in excess of the corridor are amortized over the average remaining future service.

Prior service costs/benefits for the U.S. pension plans are amortized over the average remaining future service of plan participants at the time of the plan amendment. Prior service cost/benefit for the other U.S. benefit plans is amortized over the average remaining service to full eligibility age of plan participants at the time of the plan amendment.

67




The following table represents the weighted-average actuarial assumptions:
 Retirement PlansOther Benefit Plans
Worldwide Benefit Plans202120202019202120202019
Net Periodic Benefit Cost
Service cost discount rate2.14 %2.82 3.63 2.09 3.04 4.45 
Interest cost discount rate2.34 %3.13 4.13 2.33 3.08 4.25 
Rate of increase in compensation levels4.01 %4.00 3.99 4.25 4.25 4.29 
Expected long-term rate of return on plan assets7.71 %8.12 8.31 
Benefit Obligation
Discount rate2.49 %2.14 2.91 2.68 2.23 3.39 
Rate of increase in compensation levels4.01 %4.00 4.01 4.21 4.27 4.29 
  Retirement Plans Other Benefit Plans
Worldwide Benefit Plans 2019 2018 2017 2019 2018 2017
Net Periodic Benefit Cost            
Service cost discount rate 3.63% 3.20 3.59 4.45 3.85 4.63
Interest cost discount rate 4.13% 3.60 3.98 4.25 3.62 3.94
Rate of increase in compensation levels 3.99% 3.98 4.01 4.29 4.29 4.31
Expected long-term rate of return on plan assets 8.31% 8.46 8.43      
             
Benefit Obligation            
Discount rate 2.91% 3.76 3.30 3.39 4.40 3.78
Rate of increase in compensation levels 4.01% 3.97 3.99 4.29 4.29 4.30


The Company’s discount rates are determined by considering current yield curves representing high quality, long-term fixed income instruments. The resulting discount rates are consistent with the duration of plan liabilities. The Company's methodology in determining service and interest cost uses duration specific spot rates along that yield curve to the plans' liability cash flows.

The expected rates of return on plan asset assumptions represent the Company's assessment of long-term returns on diversified investment portfolios globally. The assessment is determined using projections from external financial sources, long-term historical averages, actual returns by asset class and the various asset class allocations by market.

The following table displays the assumed health carehealthcare cost trend rates, for all individuals:
Healthcare Plans20212020
Healthcare cost trend rate assumed for next year5.33 %5.68 %
Rate to which the cost trend rate is assumed to decline (ultimate trend)3.73 %4.49 %
Year the rate reaches the ultimate trend rate2046 2040 
Health Care Plans 2019 2018
Health care cost trend rate assumed for next year 5.87% 6.12%
Rate to which the cost trend rate is assumed to decline (ultimate trend) 4.50% 4.55%
Year the rate reaches the ultimate trend rate 2040
 2038


A one-percentage-point change in assumed health care cost trend rates would have the following effect:
  One-Percentage- One-Percentage-
(Dollars in Millions) Point Increase Point Decrease
Health Care Plans  
  
Total interest and service cost $21
 (17)
Post-retirement benefit obligation $296
 (246)


6268




The following table sets forth information related to the benefit obligation and the fair value of plan assets at fiscal year-end 20192021 and 20182020 for the Company’s defined benefit retirement plans and other post-retirement plans:
 Retirement PlansOther Benefit Plans
(Dollars in Millions)2021202020212020
Change in Benefit Obligation
Projected benefit obligation — beginning of year$43,300 37,188 5,028 5,076 
Service cost1,421 1,380 309 287 
Interest cost770 955 81 133 
Plan participant contributions67 61 — — 
Amendments(1)
(1,780)— — 
Actuarial (gains) losses(2)
(2,132)5,716 (188)(75)
Divestitures & acquisitions(2)(88)— — 
Curtailments, settlements & restructuring(7)(24)— — 
Benefits paid from plan(1,157)(1,111)(348)(396)
Effect of exchange rates(683)1,003 (4)
Projected benefit obligation — end of year$41,582 43,300 4,878 5,028 
Change in Plan Assets
Plan assets at fair value — beginning of year$38,195 32,201 90 115 
Actual return on plan assets4,439 5,524 17 14 
Company contributions969 870 343 357 
Plan participant contributions67 61 — — 
Settlements(7)(13)— — 
Divestitures & acquisitions(2)(84)— — 
Benefits paid from plan assets(1,157)(1,111)(348)(396)
Effect of exchange rates(574)747 — — 
Plan assets at fair value — end of year$41,930 38,195 102 90 
Funded status — end of year$348 (5,105)(4,776)(4,938)
Amounts Recognized in the Company’s Balance Sheet consist of the following:
Non-current assets$4,436 656 — — 
Current liabilities(115)(125)(438)(418)
Non-current liabilities(3,973)(5,636)(4,338)(4,520)
Total recognized in the consolidated balance sheet — end of year$348 (5,105)(4,776)(4,938)
Amounts Recognized in Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income consist of the following:
Net actuarial loss$5,539 10,860 1,113 1,463 
Prior service cost (credit)(1)
(1,610)(1,797)(13)(44)
Unrecognized net transition obligation— — — — 
Total before tax effects$3,929 9,063 1,100 1,419 
Accumulated Benefit Obligations — end of year$39,049 40,356 
(1)In January 2021, the Company announced that, effective on January 1, 2026, all eligible U.S. non-union employees, regardless of hire date, will earn benefits under the Retirement Value formula. This amendment does not affect the benefits accrued under the Final Average Pay formula for service before January 1, 2026.
(2)The actuarial gain for retirement plans in 2021 was primarily related to increases in discount rates; the actuarial losses for retirement plans in 2020 were primarily related to decreases in discount rates.
  Retirement Plans Other Benefit Plans
(Dollars in Millions) 2019 2018 2019 2018
Change in Benefit Obligation        
Projected benefit obligation — beginning of year $31,670
 33,221
 4,480
 4,582
Service cost 1,163
 1,283
 274
 269
Interest cost 1,096
 996
 185
 148
Plan participant contributions 63
 66
 
 
Amendments 
 26
 
 
Actuarial (gains) losses 5,178
 (2,326) 562
 (119)
Divestitures & acquisitions (278) (29) 
 
Curtailments, settlements & restructuring (172) (21) 
 
Benefits paid from plan assets*
 (1,555) (1,018) (431) (383)
Effect of exchange rates 23
 (528) 6
 (17)
Projected benefit obligation — end of year $37,188
 31,670
 5,076
 4,480
Change in Plan Assets        
Plan assets at fair value — beginning of year $26,818
 28,404
 180
 281
Actual return on plan assets 6,185
 (1,269) 19
 
Company contributions 908
 1,140
 347
 282
Plan participant contributions 63
 66
 
 
Settlements (16) (13) 
 
Divestitures & acquisitions (274) (17) 
 
Benefits paid from plan assets*
 (1,555) (1,018) (431) (383)
Effect of exchange rates 72
 (475) 
 
Plan assets at fair value — end of year $32,201
 26,818
 115
 180
Funded status — end of year $(4,987) (4,852) (4,961) (4,300)
Amounts Recognized in the Company’s Balance Sheet consist of the following:        
Non-current assets $551
 475
 
 
Current liabilities (113) (98) (397) (281)
Non-current liabilities (5,425) (5,229) (4,564) (4,019)
Total recognized in the consolidated balance sheet — end of year $(4,987) (4,852) (4,961) (4,300)
Amounts Recognized in Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income consist of the following:        
Net actuarial loss $8,835
 8,323
 1,685
 1,263
Prior service cost (credit) (8) 2
 (75) (106)
Unrecognized net transition obligation 
 
 
 
Total before tax effects $8,827
 8,325
 1,610
 1,157
         
Accumulated Benefit Obligations — end of year $33,416
 28,533
    
         
*In 2019, the Company offered a voluntary lump-sum payment option for certain eligible former employees who are vested participants of the U.S. Qualified Defined Benefit Pension Plan. The distribution of the lump-sums was completed by the end of fiscal 2019. The amount distributed in 2019 was approximately $514 million.


6369



  Retirement Plans Other Benefit Plans
(Dollars in Millions) 2019 2018 2019 2018
Amounts Recognized in Net Periodic Benefit Cost and Other Comprehensive Income        
Net periodic benefit cost $593
 923
 551
 502
Net actuarial (gain) loss 1,084
 1,153
 550
 (111)
Amortization of net actuarial loss (579) (852) (129) (123)
Prior service cost (credit) 
 26
 
 
Amortization of prior service (cost) credit (4) (3) 31
 31
Effect of exchange rates 1
 (114) 1
 (3)
Total loss/(income) recognized in other comprehensive income, before tax $502
 210
 453
 (206)
Total recognized in net periodic benefit cost and other comprehensive income $1,095
 1,133
 1,004
 296

 Retirement PlansOther Benefit Plans
(Dollars in Millions)2021202020212020
Amounts Recognized in Net Periodic Benefit Cost and Other Comprehensive Income
Net periodic benefit cost$623 790 503 524 
Net actuarial (gain) loss(3,927)2,616 (199)(81)
Amortization of net actuarial loss(1,257)(891)(151)(142)
Prior service cost (credit)(1,780)— — 
Amortization of prior service (cost) credit181 (2)31 31 
Effect of exchange rates(136)293 — 
Total loss/(income) recognized in other comprehensive income, before tax$(5,134)236 (319)(191)
Total recognized in net periodic benefit cost and other comprehensive income$(4,511)1,026 184 333 

The Company plans to continue to fund its U.S. Qualified Plans to comply with the Pension Protection Act of 2006. International Plans are funded in accordance with local regulations. Additional discretionary contributions are made when deemed appropriate to meet the long-term obligations of the plans. For certain plans, funding is not a common practice, as funding provides no economic benefit. Consequently, the Company has several pension plans that are not funded.

In 2019,2021, the Company contributed $489$102 million and $419$867 million to its U.S. and international pension plans, respectively.
The following table displays the funded status of the Company's U.S. Qualified & Non-Qualified pension plans and international funded and unfunded pension plans at December 31, 20192021 and December 31, 2018,2020, respectively:

U.S. PlansInternational Plans
Qualified PlansNon-Qualified PlansFunded PlansUnfunded Plans
(Dollars in Millions)20212020202120202021202020212020
Plan Assets$27,944 25,554 — — 13,986 12,641 — — 
Projected Benefit Obligation25,041 25,466 2,703 2,748 13,428 14,541 410 545 
Accumulated Benefit Obligation23,985 24,158 2,479 2,495 12,212 13,210 373 493 
Over (Under) Funded Status
Projected Benefit Obligation$2,903 88 (2,703)(2,748)558 (1,900)(410)(545)
Accumulated Benefit Obligation3,959 1,396 (2,479)(2,495)1,774 (569)(373)(493)
 U.S. PlansInternational Plans
 Qualified PlansNon-Qualified PlansFunded PlansUnfunded Plans
(Dollars in Millions)20192018201920182019201820192018
Plan Assets$21,398
17,725


10,803
9,093


Projected Benefit Obligation22,034
18,609
2,544
2,176
12,132
10,467
478
418
Accumulated Benefit Obligation19,831
16,851
2,115
1,793
11,040
9,510
430
379
Over (Under) Funded Status        
Projected Benefit Obligation$(636)(884)(2,544)(2,176)(1,329)(1,374)(478)(418)
Accumulated Benefit Obligation1,567
874
(2,115)(1,793)(237)(417)(430)(379)

Plans with accumulated benefit obligations in excess of plan assets have an accumulated benefit obligation, projected benefit obligation and plan assets of $4.3$3.9 billion, $5.2$4.2 billion and $0.9$0.3 billion, respectively, at the end of 2019,2021, and $7.5$8.8 billion,, $8.8 $9.8 billion and $4.3$4.4 billion,, respectively, at the end of 2020.
2018.

The following table displays the projected future benefit payments from the Company’s retirement and other benefit plans:
(Dollars in Millions)202220232024202520262027-2031
Projected future benefit payments
Retirement plans$1,317 1,386 1,421 1,496 1,572 9,279 
Other benefit plans $447 459 472 485 434 2,379 
(Dollars in Millions) 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025-2029
Projected future benefit payments            
Retirement plans $1,126
 1,172
 1,234
 1,323
 1,359
 7,945
Other benefit plans  $437
 450
 466
 479
 494
 2,356


The following table displays the projected future minimum contributions to the unfunded retirement plans. These amounts do not include any discretionary contributions that the Company may elect to make in the future.
(Dollars in Millions)202220232024202520262027-2031
Projected future contributions$114 119 126 133 139 794 
(Dollars in Millions) 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025-2029
Projected future contributions $103
 107
 113
 118
 127
 749



64




Each pension plan is overseen by a local committee or board that is responsible for the overall administration and investment of the pension plans. In determining investment policies, strategies and goals, each committee or board considers factors
70


including, local pension rules and regulations; local tax regulations; availability of investment vehicles (separate accounts, commingled accounts, insurance funds, etc.); funded status of the plans; ratio of actives to retirees; duration of liabilities; and other relevant factors including: diversification, liquidity of local markets and liquidity of base currency. A majority of the Company’s pension funds are open to new entrants and are expected to be on-going plans. Permitted investments are primarily liquid and/or listed, with little reliance on illiquid and non-traditional investments such as hedge funds.

The Company’s retirement plan asset allocation at the end of 20192021 and 20182020 and target allocations for 20202022 are as follows:
  
Percent of
Plan Assets
 
Target
Allocation
  2019 2018 2020
Worldwide Retirement Plans      
Equity securities 74% 71% 69%
Debt securities 26
 29
 31
Total plan assets 100% 100% 100%

Percent of
Plan Assets
Target
Allocation
 202120202022
Worldwide Retirement Plans
Equity securities65 %66 %61 %
Debt securities35 34 39 
Total plan assets100 %100 %100 %
Determination of Fair Value of Plan Assets
The Plan has an established and well-documented process for determining fair values. Fair value is based upon quoted market prices, where available. If listed prices or quotes are not available, fair value is based upon models that primarily use, as inputs, market-based or independently sourced market parameters, including yield curves, interest rates, volatilities, equity or debt prices, foreign exchange rates and credit curves.
While the Plan believes its valuation methods are appropriate and consistent with other market participants, the use of different methodologies or assumptions to determine the fair value of certain financial instruments could result in a different estimate of fair value at the reporting date.
Valuation Hierarchy
The authoritative literature establishes a three-level hierarchy to prioritize the inputs used in measuring fair value. The levels within the hierarchy are described in the table below with Level 1 having the highest priority and Level 3 having the lowest.
The Net Asset Value (NAV) is based on the value of the underlying assets owned by the fund, minus its liabilities, and then divided by the number of shares outstanding.
A financial instrument’s categorization within the valuation hierarchy is based upon the lowest level of input that is significant to the fair value measurement.
Following is a description of the valuation methodologies used for the investments measured at fair value.
Short-term investment funds — Cash and quoted short-term instruments are valued at the closing price or the amount held on deposit by the custodian bank. Other investments are through investment vehicles valued using the NAV provided by the administrator of the fund. The NAV is a quoted price in a market that is not active and classified as Level 2.
Government and agency securities — A limited number of these investments are valued at the closing price reported on the major market on which the individual securities are traded. Where quoted prices are available in an active market, the investments are classified within Level 1 of the valuation hierarchy. If quoted market prices are not available for the specific security, then fair values are estimated by using pricing models, quoted prices of securities with similar characteristics or discounted cash flows. When quoted market prices for a security are not available in an active market, they are classified as Level 2.
Debt instruments — A limited number of these investments are valued at the closing price reported on the major market on which the individual securities are traded. Where quoted prices are available in an active market, the investments are classified as Level 1. If quoted market prices are not available for the specific security, then fair values are estimated by using pricing models, quoted prices of securities with similar characteristics or discounted cash flows and are classified as Level 2. Level 3 debt instruments are priced based on unobservable inputs.
Equity securities — Equity securities are valued at the closing price reported on the major market on which the individual securities are traded. Substantially all equity securities are classified within Level 1 of the valuation hierarchy.
Commingled funds — These investment vehicles are valued using the NAV provided by the fund administrator. Assets in the Level 2 category have a quoted market price.
Short-term investment funds — Cash and quoted short-term instruments are valued at the closing price or the amount held on deposit by the custodian bank. Other investments are through investment vehicles valued using the NAV provided by the administrator of the fund. The NAV is a quoted price in a market that is not active and classified as Level 2.
Government and agency securities — A limited number of these investments are valued at the closing price reported on the major market on which the individual securities are traded. Where quoted prices are available in an active market, the investments are classified within Level 1 of the valuation hierarchy. If quoted market prices are not available for the specific security, then fair values are estimated by using pricing models, quoted prices of securities with similar characteristics or discounted cash flows. When quoted market prices for a security are not available in an active market, they are classified as Level 2.
Debt instruments — A limited number of these investments are valued at the closing price reported on the major market on which the individual securities are traded. Where quoted prices are available in an active market, the investments are classified as Level 1. If quoted market prices are not available for the specific security, then fair values are estimated by using pricing models, quoted prices of securities with similar characteristics or discounted cash flows and are classified as Level 2. Level 3 debt instruments are priced based on unobservable inputs.
Equity securities — Equity securities are valued at the closing price reported on the major market on which the individual securities are traded. Substantially all equity securities are classified within Level 1 of the valuation hierarchy.
Commingled funds — These investment vehicles are valued using the NAV provided by the fund administrator. Assets in the Level 2 category have a quoted market price.

6571


Other assets — Other assets are represented primarily by limited partnerships. These investment vehicles are valued using the NAV provided by the fund administrator. Other assets that are exchange listed and actively traded are classified as Level 1, while inactively traded assets are classified as Level 2.

Insurance contracts — The instruments are issued by insurance companies. The fair value is based on negotiated value and the underlying investments held in separate account portfolios as well as considering the credit worthiness of the issuer. The underlying investments are government, asset-backed and fixed income securities. In general, insurance contracts are classified as Level 3 as there are no quoted prices nor other observable inputs for pricing.
Other assets — Other assets are represented primarily by limited partnerships. These investment vehicles are valued using the NAV provided by the fund administrator. Other assets that are exchange listed and actively traded are classified as Level 1, while inactively traded assets are classified as Level 2.

The following table sets forth the Retirement Plans' investments measured at fair value as of December 31, 20192021 and December 31, 2018:2020:
Quoted Prices
in Active
Markets for
Identical Assets
Significant
Other
Observable
Inputs
Significant
Unobservable
Inputs(1)
Investments Measured at Net Asset Value
 (Level 1)(Level 2)(Level 3)Total Assets
(Dollars in Millions)2021202020212020202120202021202020212020
Short-term investment funds$102 127 1,033 763 — — — — 1,135 890 
Government and agency securities— — 7,016 5,023 — — — — 7,016 5,023 
Debt instruments— — 3,505 3,931 — — — — 3,505 3,931 
Equity securities14,107 14,375 — — — — 14,109 14,377 
Commingled funds— — 5,496 4,690 105 160 8,708 8,236 14,309 13,086 
Other assets— — 34 11 15 21 1,807 856 1,856 888 
Investments at fair value$14,209 14,502 17,086 14,420 120 181 10,515 9,092 41,930 38,195 
  
Quoted Prices
in Active
Markets for
Identical Assets
 
Significant
Other
Observable
Inputs
 
Significant
Unobservable
Inputs(a)
 Investments Measured at Net Asset Value    
  (Level 1) (Level 2) (Level 3)     Total Assets
(Dollars in Millions) 2019 2018 2019 2018 2019 2018 2019 2018 2019 2018
Short-term investment funds $119
 122
 405
 529
 
 
 
 
 524
 651
Government and agency securities 
 
 4,140
 3,595
 
 
 
 
 4,140
 3,595
Debt instruments 
 
 3,452
 3,105
 
 
 
 
 3,452
 3,105
Equity securities 12,483
 11,298
 2
 4
 
 
 
 
 12,485
 11,302
Commingled funds 
 
 3,338
 2,304
 181
 133
 7,580
 5,201
 11,099
 7,638
Insurance contracts 
 
 
 
 19
 193
 
 
 19
 193
Other assets 
 
 9
 33
 
 
 473
 301
 482
 334
Investments at fair value $12,602
 11,420
 11,346
 9,570
 200
 326
 8,053
 5,502
 32,201
 26,818


(a)(1) The activity for the Level 3 assets is not significant for all years presented.

The Company's Other Benefit Plans are unfunded except for U.S. commingled funds (Level 2) of $84$102 million and $72 million and U.S. short-term investment funds (Level 2) of $31 million and $108$90 million at December 31, 20192021 and December 31, 2018,2020, respectively.
The fair value of Johnson & Johnson Common Stock directly held in plan assets was $984$385 million (3.1%(0.9% of total worldwide plan assets) at December 31, 20192021 and $876$946 million (3.3% (2.5% of total worldwide plan assets) at December 31, 2018.2020.


11.Savings Plan
11.Savings Plan
The Company has voluntary 401(k) savings plans designed to enhance the existing retirement programs covering eligible employees. The Company matches a percentage of each employee’s contributions consistent with the provisions of the plan for which he/she is eligible. Total Company matching contributions to the plans were $256 million, $243 million and $235 million $242 millionin fiscal years 2021, 2020 and 2019, respectively.
$214 million in 2019, 2018 and 2017, respectively.


6672



12.Capital and Treasury Stock


12.Capital and Treasury Stock
Changes in treasury stock were:
Treasury Stock
(Amounts in Millions Except Treasury Stock Shares in Thousands)SharesAmount
Balance at December 30, 2018457,519 $34,362 
Employee compensation and stock option plans(20,053)(2,691)
Repurchase of common stock49,870 6,746 
Balance at December 29, 2019487,336 38,417 
Employee compensation and stock option plans(21,765)(3,148)
Repurchase of common stock21,760 3,221 
Balance at January 3, 2021487,331 38,490 
Employee compensation and stock option plans(17,399)(2,847)
Repurchase of common stock20,946 3,456 
Balance at January 2, 2022490,878 $39,099 
  Treasury Stock
(Amounts in Millions Except Treasury Stock Shares in Thousands) Shares Amount
Balance at January 1, 2017 413,332
 $28,352
Employee compensation and stock option plans (25,508) (3,156)
Repurchase of common stock 49,494
 6,358
Balance at December 31, 2017 437,318
 31,554
Employee compensation and stock option plans (22,082) (3,060)
Repurchase of common stock 42,283
 5,868
Balance at December 30, 2018 457,519
 34,362
Employee compensation and stock option plans (20,053) (2,691)
Repurchase of common stock 49,870
 6,746
Balance at December 29, 2019 487,336
 $38,417


Aggregate shares of common stock issued were approximately 3,119,843,000 shares at the end of 2019, 2018fiscal years 2021, 2020 and 2019.
2017.

Cash dividends paid were $4.19 per share in fiscal year 2021, compared with dividends of $3.98 per share in fiscal year 2020, and $3.75 per share in 2019, compared with dividendsfiscal year 2019.
On January 4, 2022, the Board of $3.54Directors declared a regular cash dividend of $1.06 per share, in 2018, and $3.32 per share in 2017.payable on March 8, 2022 to shareholders of record as of February 22, 2022.
On December 17, 2018, the Company announced that its Board of Directors approved a share repurchase program, authorizing the Company to purchase up to $5.0 billion of the Company's shares of common stock. This share repurchase program was completed as of September 29, 2019.
On October 13, 2015, the Company announced that its Board of Directors approved a share repurchase program, authorizing the Company to purchase up to $10.0 billion of the Company's shares of common stock. This share repurchase program was completed as of July 2, 2017.

13.Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss)
13.Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss)
Components of other comprehensive income (loss) consist of the following:
(Dollars in Millions)Foreign
Currency Translation
Gain/(Loss) On SecuritiesEmployee Benefit PlansGain/
(Loss) On
Derivatives & Hedges
Total
Accumulated
Other
Comprehensive Income (Loss)
December 30, 2018$(8,869)— (6,158)(195)(15,222)
Net 2019 changes164 — (733)(100)(669)
December 29, 2019(8,705)— (6,891)(295)(15,891)
Net 2020 changes(233)(66)947 649 
January 3, 2021(8,938)(6,957)652 (15,242)
Net 2021 changes(1,079)(4)4,255 (988)2,184 
January 2, 2022$(10,017)(3)(2,702)(336)(13,058)
(Dollars in Millions) Foreign
Currency Translation
 Gain/(Loss) On Securities Employee Benefit Plans Gain/
(Loss) On
Derivatives & Hedges
 Total
Accumulated
Other
Comprehensive Income (Loss)
January 1, 2017 $(9,047) 411
 (5,980) (285) (14,901)
Net 2017 changes 1,696
 (179) (170) 355
 1,702
December 31, 2017 (7,351) 232
 (6,150) 70
 (13,199)
Cumulative adjustment to retained earnings 
 (232)
(1) 
    (232)
Net 2018 changes (1,518) 
 (8) (265) (1,791)
December 30, 2018 (8,869) 
 (6,158) (195) (15,222)
Net 2019 changes 164
 
 (733) (100) (669)
December 29, 2019 $(8,705) 
 (6,891) (295) (15,891)

(1)
Per the adoption of ASU 2016-01- Financial Instruments

Amounts in accumulated other comprehensive income are presented net of the related tax impact. Foreign currency translation is not adjusted for income taxes where it relates to permanent investments in international subsidiaries. For additional details on comprehensive income see the Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income.

Details on reclassifications out of Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income:
Gain/(Loss) On Securities - reclassifications released to Other (income) expense, net.
Employee Benefit Plans - reclassifications are included in net periodic benefit cost. See Note 10 for additional details.
Gain/(Loss) On Derivatives & Hedges - reclassifications to earnings are recorded in the same account as the hedged transaction. See Note 6 for additional details.


6773



14.International Currency Translation


14.International Currency Translation
For translation of its subsidiaries operating in non-U.S. Dollar currencies, the Company has determined that the local currencies of its international subsidiaries are the functional currencies except those in highly inflationary economies, which are defined as those which have had compound cumulative rates of inflation of 100% or more during the past three years,, or where a substantial portion of its cash flows are not in the local currency. For the majority of the Company's subsidiaries the local currency is the functional currency.
In consolidating international subsidiaries, balance sheet currency effects are recorded as a component of accumulated other comprehensive income. The other current and non-current assets line within the Statement of Cash flows includes the impact of foreign currency translation. This equity account includes the results of translating certain balance sheet assets and liabilities at current exchange rates and some accounts at historical rates, except for those located in highly inflationary economies, (Argentina and Venezuela). The translation of balance sheet accounts for highly inflationary economies are reflected in the operating results.
A rollforward of the changes during 2019, 2018fiscal years 2021, 2020 and 20172019 for foreign currency translation adjustments is included in Note 13.
Net currency transaction gains and losses included in Other (income) expense were losses of $236 million, $209 million and $267 million $265 millionin fiscal years 2021, 2020 and 2019, respectively.
$216 million in 2019, 2018 and 2017, respectively.

15.Earnings Per Share
15.Earnings Per Share
The following is a reconciliation of basic net earnings per share to diluted net earnings per share for the fiscal years ended January 2, 2022, January 3, 2021 and December 29, 20192019:, December 30, 2018 and December 31, 2017:
(In Millions Except Per Share Amounts)202120202019
Basic net earnings per share$7.93 5.59 5.72 
Average shares outstanding — basic2,632.1 2,632.8 2,645.1 
Potential shares exercisable under stock option plans138.0 118.3 136.3 
Less: shares repurchased under treasury stock method(96.1)(80.4)(97.8)
Convertible debt shares— — 0.7 
Adjusted average shares outstanding — diluted2,674.0 2,670.7 2,684.3 
Diluted net earnings per share$7.81 5.51 5.63 
(In Millions Except Per Share Amounts) 2019 2018 2017
Basic net earnings per share $5.72
 5.70
 0.48
Average shares outstanding — basic 2,645.1
 2,681.5
 2,692.0
Potential shares exercisable under stock option plans 136.3
 139.0
 139.7
Less: shares repurchased under treasury stock method (97.8) (92.5) (87.3)
Convertible debt shares 0.7
 0.7
 0.9
Adjusted average shares outstanding — diluted 2,684.3
 2,728.7
 2,745.3
Diluted net earnings per share $5.63
 5.61
 0.47


The diluted net earnings per share calculation included the dilutive effect of convertible debt that is offset by the related reduction in interest expense of $1 million after-tax for 2019, 2018 and 2017.
The diluted net earnings per share calculation for fiscal year 2021 included all shares related to stock options, as the exercise price of these options was less than the average market value of the Company's stock. As of January 2, 2022, the Company did not have convertible debt.

The diluted net earnings per share calculation for fiscal year 2020 excluded 18 million shares related to stock options, as the exercise price of these options was greater than the average market value of the Company's stock. As of January 3, 2021, the Company did not have convertible debt.

The diluted net earnings per share calculation for fiscal year 2019 excluded an insignificant number of shares related to stock options, as the exercise price of these options was greater than the average market value of the Company’s stock. The diluted net earnings per share calculation for 2018 and 2017fiscal year 2019 included all sharesthe dilutive effect of convertible debt that was offset by the related to stock options, as the exercise pricereduction in interest expense of all options was less than the average market value of the Company's stock.$1 million after-tax.
16.Lease Commitments
The Company primarily has operating leases for space, vehicles, manufacturing equipment and data processing equipment. Leases have remaining lease terms ranging from 1 year to 55 years, some of which could include options to extend the leases when they are reasonably certain.

The operating lease costs were approximately $307 million, $332 million and $372 million in 2019, 2018 and 2017, respectively. Cash paid for amounts included in the measurement of lease liabilities in 2019 were $308 million. Commitments under finance leases are not significant. Other supplemental information related to these leases are as follows:

The Weighted Average Remaining Lease Term and discount rate:
Operating leases                        5.8 years
Weighted Average Discount Rate                3%






68




Maturity of Lease Liabilities related to Operating Lease
The approximate minimum rental payments required under operating leases that have initial or remaining non-cancelable lease terms in excess of one year at December 29, 2019 are:

 (Dollars in Millions)Operating Leases
2020$215
2021254
2022197
2023141
202486
After 2024201
Total lease payments1,094
Less: Interest109
Present Value of lease liabilities$985


Supplemental information for comparative periods:
As of December 30, 2018, prior to the adoption of ASU 2016-02, the approximate future minimum rental payments required under operating leases that have initial or remaining non-cancelable lease terms in excess of one year were:
(Dollars in Millions)
2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 After 2023 Total
$223 188 154 116 76 139 896


Supplemental balance sheet information related to leases as of December 29, 2019 were as follows16.:Common Stock, Stock Option Plans and Stock Compensation Agreements
(Dollars in Millions)  
Non-current operating lease right-of-use assets $957
Current operating lease liabilities 269
Non-current Operating lease liabilities 716
       Total operating lease liabilities $985


17.Common Stock, Stock Option Plans and Stock Compensation Agreements
At December 29, 2019,January 2, 2022, the Company had 2 stock-based compensation plans. The shares outstanding are for contracts under the Company's 2005 Long-Term Incentive Plan and the 2012 Long-Term Incentive Plan. The 2005 Long-Term Incentive Plan expired April 26, 2012. All options and restricted shares granted subsequent to that date were under the 2012 Long-Term Incentive Plan. Under the 2012 Long-Term Incentive Plan, the Company may issue up to 650 million shares of common stock, plus any shares canceled, expired, forfeited, or not issued from the 2005 Long-Term Incentive Plan subsequent to April 26, 2012. Shares available for future grants under the 2012 Long-Term Incentive Plan were 315240 million at the end of 2019.fiscal year 2021.
The compensation cost that has been charged against income for these plans was $1,135 million, $1,005 million and $977 million $978 millionfor fiscal years 2021, 2020 and $962 million for 2019, 2018 and 2017, respectively. The total income tax benefit recognized in the income statement for share-based compensation costs was $218 million, $210 million and $227 million $192for fiscal years 2021, 2020 and 2019, respectively. The Company also recognized additional income tax benefits of $223 million, $248 million and $275$209 million for fiscal years 2021, 2020 and 2019, 2018 and 2017, respectively.respectively, for which options were exercised or restricted shares were vested. The total unrecognized compensation cost was $862 million, $804 million and $823 million $827 millionfor fiscal years 2021, 2020 and $798 million for 2019, 2018 and 2017,
74


respectively. The weighted average period for this cost to be recognized was 1.78 years, 1.76 years and 1.71 years 1.73for fiscal years 2021, 2020, and 1.76 years for 2019, 2018, and 2017, respectively. Share-based compensation costs capitalized as part of inventory were insignificant in all periods.
The Company settles employee benefit equity issuances with treasury shares. Treasury shares are replenished through market purchases throughout the year for the number of shares used to settle employee benefit equity issuances.



69



Stock Options
Stock options expire 10 years from the date of grant and vest over service periods that range from 6 months to 4 years.years. All options are granted at the average of the high and low prices of the Company’s Common Stock on the New York Stock Exchange on the date of grant.
The fair value of each option award was estimated on the date of grant using the Black-Scholes option valuation model that uses the assumptions noted in the following table. For 2019, 20182021, 2020 and 20172019 grants, expected volatility represents a blended rate of 10-year weekly historical overall volatility rate, and a 5-week average implied volatility rate based on at-the-money traded Johnson & Johnson options with a life of 2 years. For all grants, historical data is used to determine the expected life of the option. The risk-free rate was based on the U.S. Treasury yield curve in effect at the time of grant.

The average fair value of options granted was $20.86, $16.42 and $17.80, $17.98in fiscal years 2021, 2020 and $13.38, in 2019,, 2018 and 2017, respectively. The fair value was estimated based on the weighted average assumptions of:
202120202019
Risk-free rate0.83 %1.47 %2.56 %
Expected volatility18.59 %15.33 %16.27 %
Expected life (in years)7.07.07.0
Expected dividend yield2.50 %2.60 %2.80 %
 2019 2018 2017
Risk-free rate2.56% 2.77% 2.25%
Expected volatility16.27% 15.77% 15.30%
Expected life (in years)7.0
 7.0
 7.0
Expected dividend yield2.80% 2.70% 2.90%


A summary of option activity under the Plan as of January 2, 2022, January 3, 2021 and December 29, 2019,, December 30, 2018 and December 31, 2017, and changes during the years ending on those dates is presented below:
(Shares in Thousands)Outstanding SharesWeighted
Average Exercise Price
Aggregate
Intrinsic
Value
(Dollars in Millions)
Shares at December 30, 2018109,652 $98.29 $3,214 
Options granted19,745 131.94 
Options exercised(14,785)82.43 
Options canceled/forfeited(2,975)125.11 
Shares at December 29, 2019111,637 105.63 4,478 
Options granted20,723 151.41 
Options exercised(16,275)86.05 
Options canceled/forfeited(1,835)137.62 
Shares at January 3, 2021114,250 116.22 4,703 
Options granted18,525 164.62 
Options exercised(13,248)97.48 
Options canceled/forfeited(2,166)149.75 
Shares at January 2, 2022117,361 $125.36 $5,364 
(Shares in Thousands) Outstanding Shares 
Weighted
Average Exercise Price
 
Aggregate
Intrinsic
Value
(Dollars in Millions)
Shares at January 1, 2017 113,455
 $83.16
 $3,636
Options granted 19,287
 115.67
  
Options exercised (18,975) 70.87
  
Options canceled/forfeited (2,461) 101.40
  
Shares at December 31, 2017 111,306
 90.48
 5,480
Options granted 17,115
 129.51
  
Options exercised (16,228) 75.44
  
Options canceled/forfeited (2,541) 112.90
  
Shares at December 30, 2018 109,652
 98.29
 3,214
Options granted 19,745
 131.94
  
Options exercised (14,785) 82.43
  
Options canceled/forfeited (2,975) 125.11
  
Shares at December 29, 2019 111,637
 $105.63
 $4,478


The total intrinsic value of options exercised was $919 million, $1,021 million and $807 million $1,028 millionin fiscal years 2021, 2020 and 2019, respectively.
$1,060 million in 2019, 2018 and 2017, respectively.

75



The following table summarizes stock options outstanding and exercisable at December 29, 2019:
(Shares in Thousands) Outstanding Exercisable
Exercise Price Range Options 
Average Life(1)
 Average Exercise Price Options Average Exercise Price
$58.65-$66.07 7,752
 1.3 $63.71 7,752
 $63.71
$72.54-$90.44 23,837
 3.6 $82.08 23,837
 $82.08
$100.06-$101.87 29,586
 5.6 $101.07 29,083
 $101.05
$115.67-$129.51 31,810
 7.6 $122.32 84
 $120.76
$131.94-$141.06 18,652
 9.1 $131.94 5
 $131.94
  111,637
 6.0 $105.63 60,761
 $88.88

January 2, 2022:


70



(Shares in Thousands)OutstandingExercisable
Exercise Price RangeOptions
Average Life(1)
Weighted Average Exercise PriceOptionsWeighted Average Exercise Price
$65.08-$90.4416,007 1.6$81.9216,007 $81.92
$100.06-$101.8722,647 3.6$101.0722,647 $101.07
$115.67-$129.5124,543 5.6$122.5923,972 $122.43
$131.94-$151.4136,304 7.6$142.23100 $140.72
$151.42-$164.6217,860 9.1$164.6216 $164.62
 117,361 5.8$125.3662,742 $104.42
(1) Average contractual life remaining in years.
Stock options outstanding at December 30, 2018January 3, 2021 and December 31, 201729, 2019 were 109,652114,250 and an average life of 6.26.0 years and 111,306111,637 and an average life of 6.36.0 years, respectively. Stock options exercisable at December 30, 2018January 3, 2021 and December 31, 201729, 2019 were 54,86261,289 at an average price of $82.03$96.97 and 52,42160,761 at an average price of $73.61,$88.88, respectively.
Restricted Share Units and Performance Share Units
The Company grants restricted share units which vest over service periods that range from 6 months to 3 years.years. The Company also grants performance share units, which are paid in shares of Johnson & Johnson Common Stock after the end of a three-yearthree-year performance period. Whether any performance share units vest, and the amount that does vest, is tied to the completion of service periods that range from 6 months to 3 years and the achievement, over a three-year period, of three equally-weighted goals that directly align with or help drive long-term total shareholder return: operational sales, adjusted operational earnings per share, and relative total shareholder return. Beginning in fiscal 2020, performance shares were granted with two equally-weighted goals that directly align with or help drive long-term total shareholder return: adjusted operational earnings per share and relative total shareholder return. The number of shares actually earned at the end of the three-year period will vary, based only on actual performance, from 0% to 200% of the target number of performance share units granted.In the fourth quarter of 2017, the Company modified the restricted share units that were scheduled to vest between January 1, 2018 and March 15, 2018. This modification guaranteed a minimum aggregate value, below the market value of the total expected payout amount, for all awards expected to vest during this period. The amount that was committed was not material to the Company’s overall financial position.

A summary of the restricted share units and performance share units activity under the Plans as of December 29, 2019January 2, 2022 is presented below:
(Shares in Thousands) Outstanding Restricted Share Units Outstanding Performance Share Units
Shares at December 30, 2018 18,460
 2,494
Granted 5,769
 932
Issued (6,261) (996)
Canceled/forfeited/adjusted (1,199) (256)
Shares at December 29, 2019 16,769
 2,174

(Shares in Thousands)Outstanding Restricted Share UnitsOutstanding Performance Share Units
Shares at January 3, 202114,998 2,236 
Granted4,981 741 
Issued(5,101)(610)
Canceled/forfeited/adjusted(756)(55)
Shares at January 2, 202214,122 2,312 
The average fair value of the restricted share units granted was $152.62, $139.58 and $121.31 $119.67in fiscal years 2021, 2020 and $107.69 in 2019, 2018 and 2017, respectively, using the fair market value at the date of grant. The fair value of restricted share units was discounted for dividends, which are not paid on the restricted share units during the vesting period. The fair value of restricted share units issued was $585.9$611 million, $613.7$650 million and $596.5$586 million in 2019, 20182021, 2020 and 2017,2019, respectively.
The weighted average fair value of the performance share units granted was $179.35, $160.54 and $124.67 $120.64in fiscal years 2021, 2020 and $114.13 in 2019, 2018 and 2017, calculated using the weighted average fair market value for each of the three component goals at the date of grant. 
The fair values for the sales and earnings per share goals of each performance share unit were estimated on the date of grant using the fair market value of the shares at the time of the award discounted for dividends, which are not paid on the performance share units during the vesting period. The fair value for the relative total shareholder return goal of each performance share unit was estimated on the date of grant using the Monte Carlo valuation model. The fair value of performance share units issued was $119.1$83 million, $128.8$91 million and $132.5$119 million in 2019, 2018fiscal years 2021, 2020 and 2017,2019, respectively.


7176



17.Segments of Business* and Geographic Areas
 Sales to Customers% Change
(Dollars in Millions)202120202019’21 vs. ’20’20 vs. ’19
Consumer Health   
OTC
     U.S.$2,594 2,460 2,010 5.4 %22.4 
     International2,634 2,364 2,434 11.4 (2.9)
     Worldwide5,227 4,824 4,444 8.4 8.5 
Skin Health/Beauty
     U.S.2,400 2,350 2,392 2.1 (1.7)
     International2,141 2,100 2,201 1.9 (4.6)
     Worldwide4,541 4,450 4,593 2.0 (3.1)
Oral Care
     U.S.637 683 621 (6.7)9.9 
     International1,008 958 906 5.1 5.7 
     Worldwide1,645 1,641 1,528 0.2 7.4 
Baby Care
     U.S.378 376 362 0.5 3.7 
     International1,188 1,141 1,313 4.1 (13.1)
     Worldwide1,566 1,517 1,675 3.2 (9.4)
Women's Health
     U.S.13 13 12 (1.6)8.2 
     International905 888 974 1.8 (8.8)
     Worldwide917 901 986 1.8 (8.6)
Wound Care/Other
     U.S.495 480 441 3.1 8.9 
     International243 240 230 1.7 4.1 
     Worldwide739 720 671 2.6 7.2 
TOTAL CONSUMER HEALTH
     U.S.6,516 6,362 5,839 2.4 9.0 
     International8,119 7,691 8,059 5.6 (4.6)
     Worldwide14,635 14,053 13,898 4.1 1.1 




18.Segments of Business and Geographic Areas

  Sales to Customers % Change
(Dollars in Millions) 2019 2018 2017 ’19 vs. ’18 ’18 vs. ’17
           
CONSUMER          
Baby Care          
     U.S. $362
 422
 449
 (14.2)% (6.0)
     International 1,313
 1,436
 1,467
 (8.6) (2.1)
     Worldwide 1,675
 1,858
 1,916
 (9.9) (3.0)
Beauty          
     U.S. 2,392
 2,403
 2,335
 (0.4) 2.9
     International 2,201
 1,979
 1,865
 11.2
 6.1
     Worldwide 4,593
 4,382
 4,200
 4.8
 4.3
Oral Care          
     U.S. 621
 637
 616
 (2.5) 3.4
     International 906
 918
 915
 (1.2) 0.3
     Worldwide 1,528
 1,555
 1,531
 (1.7) 1.6
OTC          
     U.S. 2,010
 1,850
 1,716
 8.6
 7.8
     International 2,434
 2,484
 2,410
 (2.0) 3.1
     Worldwide 4,444
 4,334
 4,126
 2.5
 5.0
Women's Health          
     U.S. 12
 13
 12
 (5.5) 8.3
     International 974
 1,036
 1,038
 (6.0) (0.2)
     Worldwide 986
 1,049
 1,050
 (6.0) (0.1)
Wound Care/Other          
     U.S. 441
 436
 437
 1.2
 (0.2)
     International 230
 239
 342
 (3.9) (30.1)
     Worldwide 671
 675
 779
 (0.6) (13.4)
TOTAL CONSUMER          
     U.S. 5,839
 5,761
 5,565
 1.4
 3.5
     International 8,059
 8,092
 8,037
 (0.4) 0.7
     Worldwide 13,898
 13,853
 13,602
 0.3
 1.8
           

7277



PHARMACEUTICAL
Immunology
     U.S.10,843 10,175 9,641 6.6 5.5 
     International5,907 4,880 4,309 21.0 13.2 
     Worldwide16,750 15,055 13,950 11.3 7.9 
     REMICADE®
     U.S.2,019 2,508 3,079 (19.5)(18.5)
     U.S. Exports236 346 294 (31.9)18.0 
     International935 893 1,007 4.8 (11.4)
     Worldwide3,190 3,747 4,380 (14.9)(14.4)
     SIMPONI / SIMPONI ARIA®
     U.S.1,127 1,155 1,159 (2.4)(0.3)
     International1,148 1,088 1,029 5.5 5.8 
     Worldwide2,276 2,243 2,188 1.4 2.6 
     STELARA®
     U.S.5,938 5,240 4,346 13.3 20.6 
     International3,196 2,467 2,015 29.6 22.4 
     Worldwide9,134 7,707 6,361 18.5 21.1 
     TREMFYA®
     U.S.1,503 926 764 62.3 21.3 
     International624 421 248 48.2 69.9 
     Worldwide2,127 1,347 1,012 57.9 33.2 
     OTHER IMMUNOLOGY
     U.S.21 — — **— 
     International11 10 (73.3)6.4 
     Worldwide24 11 10 **6.4 
Infectious Diseases
     U.S.2,249 1,735 1,597 29.7 8.6 
     International3,612 1,839 1,815 96.3 1.3 
     Worldwide5,861 3,574 3,413 64.0 4.7 
     COVID-19 VACCINE
U.S.634 — — ****
International1,751 — — ****
Worldwide2,385 — — ****
     EDURANT® / rilpivirine
     U.S.41 44 50 (7.6)(11.2)
     International953 920 812 3.6 13.3 
     Worldwide994 964 861 3.1 11.9 
     PREZISTA® / PREZCOBIX® / REZOLSTA® / SYMTUZA®
     U.S.1,508 1,587 1,422 (4.9)11.6 
     International575 597 689 (3.6)(13.4)
     Worldwide2,083 2,184 2,110 (4.6)3.5 
     OTHER INFECTIOUS DISEASES
     U.S.66 104 126 (36.0)(17.6)
     International333 323 315 3.0 2.6 
     Worldwide399 427 441 (6.5)(3.2)
PHARMACEUTICAL          
Immunology          
     U.S. 9,641
 9,073
 8,871
 6.3
 2.3
     International 4,309
 4,047
 3,373
 6.5
 20.0
     Worldwide 13,950
 13,120
 12,244
 6.3
 7.2
     REMICADE®
          
     U.S. 3,079
 3,664
 4,525
 (16.0) (19.0)
     U.S. Exports 294
 436
 563
 (32.7) (22.6)
     International 1,007
 1,226
 1,227
 (17.8) (0.1)
     Worldwide 4,380
 5,326
 6,315
 (17.8) (15.7)
     SIMPONI / SIMPONI ARIA®
          
     U.S. 1,159
 1,051
 954
 10.2
 10.2
     International 1,029
 1,033
 879
 (0.4) 17.5
     Worldwide 2,188
 2,084
 1,833
 5.0
 13.7
     STELARA®
          
     U.S. 4,346
 3,469
 2,767
 25.3
 25.4
     International 2,015
 1,687
 1,244
 19.4
 35.6
     Worldwide 6,361
 5,156
 4,011
 23.4
 28.5
     TREMFYA®
          
     U.S. 764
 453
 62
 68.5
 *
     International 248
 91
 1
 * *
     Worldwide 1,012
 544
 63
 85.9
 *
     OTHER IMMUNOLOGY
          
     U.S. 
 
 
 
 
     International 10
 10
 22
 4.5
 (54.5)
     Worldwide 10
 10
 22
 4.5
 (54.5)
           
Infectious Diseases          
     U.S. 1,597
 1,378
 1,358
 15.9
 1.5
     International 1,815
 1,926
 1,796
 (5.7) 7.2
     Worldwide 3,413
 3,304
 3,154
 3.3
 4.8
     EDURANT® / rilpivirine
          
     U.S. 50
 58
 58
 (13.7) 0.0
     International 812
 758
 656
 7.1
 15.5
     Worldwide 861
 816
 714
 5.6
 14.3
     PREZISTA® / PREZCOBIX® /                                                REZOLSTA® / SYMTUZA®
          
     U.S. 1,422
 1,169
 1,109
 21.6
 5.4
     International 689
 786
 712
 (12.3) 10.4
     Worldwide 2,110
 1,955
 1,821
 8.0
 7.4
     OTHER INFECTIOUS DISEASES
          
     U.S. 126
 151
 191
 (16.5) (20.9)
     International 315
 382
 428
 (17.6) (10.7)
     Worldwide 441
 533
 619
 (17.3) (13.9)
           

7378



Neuroscience
     U.S.3,347 3,091 2,919 8.3 5.9 
     International3,664 3,457 3,409 6.0 1.4 
     Worldwide7,011 6,548 6,328 7.1 3.5 
     CONCERTA® / methylphenidate
     U.S.172 183 233 (5.8)(21.4)
     International495 439 463 12.8 (5.1)
     Worldwide667 622 696 7.3 (10.6)
       INVEGA SUSTENNA® / XEPLION® / INVEGA TRINZA® / TREVICTA®
     U.S.2,550 2,314 2,107 10.2 9.8 
     International1,472 1,339 1,224 10.0 9.4 
     Worldwide4,022 3,653 3,330 10.1 9.7 
     RISPERDAL CONSTA®
     U.S.287 296 314 (2.9)(5.9)
     International305 346 374 (11.8)(7.5)
     Worldwide592 642 688 (7.7)(6.8)
     OTHER NEUROSCIENCE
     U.S.338 298 266 13.3 12.4 
     International1,391 1,334 1,349 4.3 (1.1)
     Worldwide1,729 1,632 1,614 6.0 1.1 
Oncology
     U.S.5,958 5,092 4,299 17.0 18.5 
     International8,590 7,275 6,393 18.1 13.8 
     Worldwide14,548 12,367 10,692 17.6 15.7 
     DARZALEX®
     U.S.3,169 2,232 1,567 42.0 42.4 
     International2,854 1,958 1,430 45.8 36.9 
     Worldwide6,023 4,190 2,998 43.8 39.8 
     ERLEADA®
     U.S.813 583 297 39.3 96.1
     International478 176 35  * ** *
     Worldwide1,291 760 332 70.0 * *
     IMBRUVICA®
     U.S.1,747 1,821 1,555 (4.0)17.1 
     International2,622 2,307 1,856 13.6 24.3 
     Worldwide4,369 4,128 3,411 5.8 21.0 
     ZYTIGA® /abiraterone acetate
     U.S.119 373 810 (68.1)(54.0)
     International2,178 2,097 1,985 3.9 5.6 
     Worldwide2,297 2,470 2,795 (7.0)(11.6)
     OTHER ONCOLOGY
     U.S.110 83 70 31.7 18.6 
     International458 738 1,087 (37.9)(32.1)
     Worldwide568 821 1,158 (30.8)(29.1)
Neuroscience          
     U.S. 2,919
 2,574
 2,630
 13.4
 (2.1)
     International 3,409
 3,503
 3,356
 (2.7) 4.4
     Worldwide 6,328
 6,077
 5,986
 4.1
 1.5
     CONCERTA® / Methylphenidate
          
     U.S. 233
 229
 384
 1.7
 (40.4)
     International 463
 434
 407
 6.6
 6.6
     Worldwide 696
 663
 791
 4.9
 (16.2)
     INVEGA SUSTENNA® / XEPLION® / INVEGA TRINZA® / TREVICTA®
          
     U.S. 2,107
 1,791
 1,590
 17.6
 12.6
     International 1,224
 1,137
 979
 7.7
 16.1
     Worldwide 3,330
 2,928
 2,569
 13.7
 14.0
     RISPERDAL CONSTA®
          
     U.S. 314
 315
 360
 (0.3) (12.5)
     International 374
 422
 445
 (11.4) (5.2)
     Worldwide 688
 737
 805
 (6.7) (8.4)
     OTHER NEUROSCIENCE
          
     U.S. 266
 239
 296
 11.4
 (19.3)
     International 1,349
 1,510
 1,525
 (10.7) (1.0)
     Worldwide 1,614
 1,749
 1,821
 (7.7) (4.0)
           
Oncology          
     U.S. 4,299
 4,331
 3,098
 (0.7) 39.8
     International 6,393
 5,513
 4,160
 16.0
 32.5
     Worldwide 10,692
 9,844
 7,258
 8.6
 35.6
     DARZALEX®
          
     U.S. 1,567
 1,203
 884
 30.3
 36.1
     International 1,430
 822
 358
 73.9
 *
     Worldwide 2,998
 2,025
 1,242
 48.0
 63.0
     IMBRUVICA®
          
     U.S. 1,555
 1,129
 841
 37.7
 34.2
     International 1,856
 1,486
 1,052
 24.9
 41.3
     Worldwide 3,411
 2,615
 1,893
 30.4
 38.1
     VELCADE®
          
     U.S. 
 
 
 
 
     International 751
 1,116
 1,114
 (32.7) 0.2
     Worldwide 751
 1,116
 1,114
 (32.7) 0.2
     ZYTIGA® /abiraterone acetate
          
     U.S. 810
 1,771
 1,228
 (54.3) 44.2
     International 1,985
 1,727
 1,277
 15.0
 35.2
     Worldwide 2,795
 3,498
 2,505
 (20.1) 39.6
     OTHER ONCOLOGY
          
     U.S. 367
 228
 145
 61.0
 57.2
     International 371
 362
 359
 2.4
 0.8
     Worldwide 739
 590
 504
 25.0
 17.1
           

7479



Pulmonary Hypertension
     U.S.2,365 2,133 1,684 10.9 26.6 
     International1,085 1,015 939 6.9 8.2 
     Worldwide3,450 3,148 2,623 9.6 20.0 
     OPSUMIT®
     U.S.1,147 1,008 766 13.7 31.7 
     International672 631 562 6.6 12.3 
     Worldwide1,819 1,639 1,327 11.0 23.5 
     UPTRAVI®
     U.S.1,056 955 714 10.5 33.8 
     International181 138 105 31.1 30.9 
     Worldwide1,237 1,093 819 13.1 33.5 
     OTHER
     U.S.163 169 205 (3.7)(17.6)
     International232 247 272 (5.9)(9.2)
     Worldwide395 416 476 (5.0)(12.8)
Cardiovascular / Metabolism / Other
     U.S.3,192 3,509 3,734 (9.0)(6.0)
     International1,268 1,369 1,458 (7.4)(6.1)
     Worldwide4,460 4,878 5,192 (8.6)(6.0)
     XARELTO®
     U.S.2,438 2,345 2,313 4.0 1.4 
     International— — — — — 
     Worldwide2,438 2,345 2,313 4.0 1.4 
     INVOKANA® / INVOKAMET®
     U.S.308 564 536 (45.4)5.2 
     International254 231 199 9.9 16.3 
     Worldwide563 795 735 (29.3)8.2 
     PROCRIT® / EPREX®
     U.S.223 277 505 (19.7)(45.1)
     International256 274 285 (6.8)(3.8)
     Worldwide479 552 790 (13.3)(30.2)
     OTHER
     U.S.223 323 380 (31.0)(15.1)
     International758 864 974 (12.2)(11.3)
     Worldwide981 1,186 1,353 (17.3)(12.4)
TOTAL PHARMACEUTICAL
     U.S.27,954 25,735 23,874 8.6 7.8 
     International24,126 19,837 18,324 21.6 8.3 
     Worldwide52,080 45,572 42,198 14.3 8.0 
Pulmonary Hypertension          
     U.S. 1,684
 1,651
 773
 2.0
 *
     International 939
 922
 554
 1.9
 66.4
     Worldwide 2,623
 2,573
 1,327
 1.9
 93.9
     OPSUMIT®
          
     U.S. 766
 700
 320
 9.4
 *
     International 562
 515
 253
 9.0
 *
     Worldwide 1,327
 1,215
 573
 9.2
 *
     TRACLEER® / bosentan
          
     U.S. 131
 268
 161
 (51.1) 66.5
     International 210
 278
 242
 (24.3) 14.9
     Worldwide 341
 546
 403
 (37.5) 35.5
     UPTRAVI®
          
     U.S. 714
 598
 238
 19.3
 *
     International 105
 65
 25
 62.4
 *
     Worldwide 819
 663
 263
 23.5
 *
     OTHER 
          
     U.S. 74
 85
 54
 (13.7) 57.4
     International 62
 64
 34
 (3.7) 88.2
     Worldwide 135
 149
 88
 (9.4) 69.3
Cardiovascular / Metabolism / Other          
     U.S. 3,734
 4,279
 4,744
 (12.7) (9.8)
     International 1,458
 1,537
 1,543
 (5.2) (0.4)
     Worldwide 5,192
 5,816
 6,287
 (10.7) (7.5)
     XARELTO®
          
     U.S. 2,313
 2,477
 2,500
 (6.6) (0.9)
     International 
 
 
 
 
     Worldwide 2,313
 2,477
 2,500
 (6.6) (0.9)
     INVOKANA® / INVOKAMET®
          
     U.S. 536
 711
 944
 (24.6) (24.7)
     International 199
 170
 167
 17.3
 1.8
     Worldwide 735
 881
 1,111
 (16.5) (20.7)
     PROCRIT® / EPREX®
          
     U.S. 505
 674
 675
 (25.1) (0.1)
     International 285
 314
 297
 (9.2) 5.7
     Worldwide 790
 988
 972
 (20.0) 1.6
     OTHER
          
     U.S. 380
 417
 625
 (9.1) (33.3)
     International 974
 1,053
 1,079
 (7.6) (2.4)
     Worldwide 1,353
 1,470
 1,704
 (8.0) (13.7)
           
TOTAL PHARMACEUTICAL          
     U.S. 23,874
 23,286
 21,474
 2.5
 8.4
     International 18,324
 17,448
 14,782
 5.0
 18.0
     Worldwide 42,198
 40,734
 36,256
 3.6
 12.4
           

7580



MEDICAL DEVICES
Interventional Solutions
     U.S.1,836 1,452 1,443 26.4 0.6 
     International2,135 1,594 1,554 34.0 2.6 
     Worldwide3,971 3,046 2,997 30.4 1.6 
Orthopaedics
     U.S.5,126 4,779 5,319 7.3 (10.2)
     International3,462 2,984 3,520 16.0 (15.2)
     Worldwide8,588 7,763 8,839 10.6 (12.2)
     HIPS
     U.S.883 793 863 11.4 (8.2)
     International602 487 575 23.6 (15.3)
     Worldwide1,485 1,280 1,438 16.0 (11.0)
     KNEES
     U.S.787 743 889 5.9 (16.4)
     International538 427 591 26.1 (27.8)
     Worldwide1,325 1,170 1,480 13.3 (21.0)
     TRAUMA
     U.S.1,819 1,648 1,652 10.4 (0.2)
     International1,066 966 1,068 10.4 (9.6)
     Worldwide2,885 2,614 2,720 10.4 (3.9)
     SPINE, SPORTS & OTHER
     U.S.1,637 1,595 1,915 2.6 (16.7)
     International1,256 1,104 1,286 13.8 (14.1)
     Worldwide2,893 2,699 3,201 7.2 (15.7)
Surgery
     U.S.3,867 3,249 3,828 19.0 (15.1)
     International5,945 4,983 5,673 19.3 (12.2)
     Worldwide9,812 8,232 9,501 19.2 (13.4)
     ADVANCED
     U.S.1,761 1,535 1,637 14.9 (6.2)
     International2,861 2,304 2,458 24.1 (6.2)
     Worldwide4,622 3,839 4,095 20.4 (6.2)
     GENERAL
     U.S.2,105 1,714 2,192 22.7 (21.8)
     International3,085 2,679 3,215 15.2 (16.7)
     Worldwide5,190 4,392 5,406 18.1 (18.8)
Vision
     U.S.1,857 1,557 1,794 19.3 (13.2)
     International2,831 2,362 2,830 19.8 (16.5)
     Worldwide4,688 3,919 4,624 19.6 (15.2)
     CONTACT LENSES / OTHER
     U.S.1,398 1,213 1,304 15.2 (7.0)
     International2,043 1,781 2,088 14.7 (14.7)
     Worldwide3,440 2,994 3,392 14.9 (11.7)
MEDICAL DEVICES          
Diabetes Care          
     U.S. 
 371
 612
 * (39.4)
     International 
 638
 1,003
 * (36.4)
     Worldwide 
 1,009
 1,615
 * (37.5)
Diagnostics          
     U.S. 
 
 
  
     International 
 
 1
  *
     Worldwide 
 
 1
  *
Interventional Solutions          
     U.S. 1,443
 1,283
 1,148
 12.5
 11.8
     International 1,554
 1,363
 1,148
 14.0
 18.7
     Worldwide 2,997
 2,646
 2,296
 13.3
 15.2
Orthopaedics          
     U.S. 5,319
 5,281
 5,404
 0.7
 (2.3)
     International 3,520
 3,604
 3,654
 (2.3) (1.4)
     Worldwide 8,839
 8,885
 9,058
 (0.5) (1.9)
     HIPS
          
     U.S. 863
 841
 827
 2.6
 1.7
     International 575
 577
 567
 (0.3) 1.8
     Worldwide 1,438
 1,418
 1,394
 1.4
 1.7
     KNEES
          
     U.S. 889
 911
 948
 (2.4) (3.9)
     International 591
 591
 575
 0.0
 2.8
     Worldwide 1,480
 1,502
 1,523
 (1.4) (1.4)
     TRAUMA
          
     U.S. 1,652
 1,599
 1,576
 3.3
 1.5
     International 1,068
 1,100
 1,040
 (2.9) 5.8
     Worldwide 2,720
 2,699
 2,616
 0.8
 3.2
     SPINE & OTHER
          
     U.S. 1,915
 1,930
 2,053
 (0.8) (6.0)
     International 1,286
 1,336
 1,472
 (3.8) (9.2)
     Worldwide 3,201
 3,266
 3,525
 (2.0) (7.3)
Surgery          
     U.S. 3,828
 4,125
 4,085
 (7.2) 1.0
     International 5,673
 5,776
 5,474
 (1.8) 5.5
     Worldwide 9,501
 9,901
 9,559
 (4.0) 3.6
     ADVANCED
          
     U.S. 1,637
 1,657
 1,620
 (1.2) 2.3
     International 2,458
 2,345
 2,136
 4.8
 9.8
     Worldwide 4,095
 4,002
 3,756
 2.3
 6.5
     GENERAL
          
     U.S. 1,762
 1,751
 1,728
 0.6
 1.3
     International 2,718
 2,806
 2,735
 (3.1) 2.6
     Worldwide 4,480
 4,557
 4,463
 (1.7) 2.1

7681



     SURGICAL
     U.S.459 344 490 33.5 (29.7)
     International788 581 742 35.7 (21.7)
     Worldwide1,248 925 1,232 34.9 (24.9)
TOTAL MEDICAL DEVICES   
     U.S.12,686 11,036 12,384 14.9 (10.9)
     International14,374 11,923 13,579 20.6 (12.2)
     Worldwide27,060 22,959 25,963 17.9 (11.6)
WORLDWIDE   
     U.S.47,156 43,133 42,097 9.3 2.5 
     International46,619 39,451 39,962 18.2 (1.3)
     Worldwide$93,775 82,584 82,059 13.6 %0.6 
*Certain prior year amounts have been reclassified to conform to current year presentation
     SPECIALTY
          
     U.S. 430
 717
 737
 (40.1) (2.7)
     International 497
 625
 603
 (20.5) 3.6
     Worldwide 926
 1,342
 1,340
 (31.0) 0.1
Vision          
     U.S. 1,794
 1,777
 1,575
 0.9
 12.8
     International 2,830
 2,776
 2,488
 2.0
 11.6
     Worldwide 4,624
 4,553
 4,063
 1.6
 12.1
     CONTACT LENSES / OTHER
          
     U.S. 1,304
 1,237
 1,122
 5.4
 10.2
     International 2,088
 2,065
 1,914
 1.1
 7.9
     Worldwide 3,392
 3,302
 3,036
 2.7
 8.8
     SURGICAL
          
     U.S. 490
 540
 453
 (9.4) 19.2
     International 742
 711
 574
 4.4
 23.9
     Worldwide 1,232
 1,251
 1,027
 (1.6) 21.8
           
TOTAL MEDICAL DEVICES          
     U.S. 12,384
 12,837
 12,824
 (3.5) 0.1
     International 13,579
 14,157
 13,768
 (4.1) 2.8
     Worldwide 25,963
 26,994
 26,592
 (3.8) 1.5
           
WORLDWIDE          
     U.S. 42,097
 41,884
 39,863
 0.5
 5.1
     International 39,962
 39,697
 36,587
 0.7
 8.5
     Worldwide $82,059
 81,581
 76,450
 0.6 % 6.7
**Percentage greater than 100% or not meaningful

  Income Before Tax Identifiable Assets
(Dollars in Millions) 
2019 (3)
 
2018 (4)
 
2017 (5)
 2019 2018
Consumer $2,061
 2,320
 2,524
 $26,618
 25,877
Pharmaceutical 8,816
 12,568
 11,083
 56,292
 56,636
Medical Devices 7,286
 4,397
 5,392
 49,462
 46,254
Total 18,163
 19,285
 18,999
 132,372
 128,767
Less: Expense not allocated to segments (1)
 835
 1,286
 1,326
    
General corporate (2)
       25,356
 24,187
Worldwide total $17,328
 17,999
 17,673
 $157,728
 152,954

  
Additions to Property,
Plant & Equipment
 
Depreciation and
Amortization
(Dollars in Millions) 2019 2018 2017 2019 2018 2017
Consumer $328
 438
 485
 $765
 688
 674
Pharmaceutical 950
 1,012
 936
 3,910
 3,802
 2,416
Medical Devices 1,912
 1,843
 1,566
 2,014
 2,103
 2,216
Segments total 3,190
 3,293
 2,987
 6,689
 6,593
 5,306
General corporate 308
 377
 292
 320
 336
 336
Worldwide total $3,498
 3,670
 3,279
 $7,009
 6,929
 5,642


 Income (Loss) Before TaxIdentifiable Assets
(Dollars in Millions)
2021 (3)
2020 (4)
2019 (5)
20212020
Consumer Health$1,294 (1,064)2,061 $25,081 27,355 
Pharmaceutical18,181 15,462 8,816 64,376 66,158 
Medical Devices4,373 3,044 7,286 53,372 49,578 
Total23,848 17,442 18,163 142,829 143,091 
Less: Expense not allocated to segments (1)
1,072 945 835 
General corporate (2)
39,189 31,803 
Worldwide total$22,776 16,497 17,328 $182,018 174,894 
77



Additions to Property,
Plant & Equipment
Depreciation and
Amortization
(Dollars in Millions)202120202019202120202019
Consumer Health$331 248 328 $759 785 765 
Pharmaceutical1,198 863 950 4,029 4,006 3,910 
Medical Devices1,933 1,980 1,912 2,286 2,140 2,014 
Segments total3,462 3,091 3,190 7,074 6,931 6,689 
General corporate190 256 308 316 300 320 
Worldwide total$3,652 3,347 3,498 $7,390 7,231 7,009 

 Sales to Customers
Long-Lived Assets (6)
(Dollars in Millions)20212020201920212020
United States$47,156 43,133 42,097 $48,586 49,951 
Europe23,594 18,980 18,466 43,257 49,363 
Western Hemisphere excluding U.S. 5,750 5,335 5,941 2,708 2,734 
Asia-Pacific, Africa17,275 15,136 15,555 5,035 5,484 
Segments total93,775 82,584 82,059 99,586 107,532 
General corporate1,014 1,029 
Other non long-lived assets81,418 66,333 
Worldwide total$93,775 82,584 82,059 $182,018 174,894 

  Sales to Customers 
Long-Lived Assets (6)
(Dollars in Millions) 2019 2018 2017 2019 2018
United States $42,097
 41,884
 39,863
 $41,528
 37,117
Europe 18,466
 18,753
 17,126
 48,015
 51,433
Western Hemisphere excluding U.S.  5,941
 6,113
 6,041
 2,862
 2,752
Asia-Pacific, Africa 15,555
 14,831
 13,420
 5,486
 2,733
Segments total 82,059
 81,581
 76,450
 97,891
 94,035
General corporate       1,049
 1,064
Other non long-lived assets       58,788
 57,855
Worldwide total $82,059
 81,581
 76,450
 $157,728
 152,954
­
See Note 1 for a description of the segments in which the Company operates.
82


Export sales are not significant. In 2019,fiscal year 2021, the Company utilized three wholesalers distributing products for all 3 segments that represented approximately 15.0%, 12.0% and 11.0% of the total consolidated revenues. In 2018, the Company had three wholesalers distributing products for all 3 segments that represented approximately 14.0%, 11.0% and 11.0% of the total consolidated revenues. In 2017,fiscal year 2020, the Company had twothree wholesalers distributing products for all 3 segments that represented approximately 14.0%16.0%, 12.0% and 10.0%12.0% of the total consolidated revenues. In fiscal year 2019, the Company had three wholesalers distributing products for all 3 segments that represented approximately 15.0%, 12.0%, and 11.0% of the total consolidated revenues.
(1)Amounts not allocated to segments include interest (income) expense and general corporate (income) expense.
(2)General corporate includes cash, cash equivalents and marketable securities.
(3)Consumer Health includes:
Litigation expense of $1.6 billion, primarily talc related reserves
A restructuring related charge of $0.1 billion
Pharmaceutical includes:
Litigation expense of $0.6 billion, primarily related to Risperdal
Divestiture gains of $0.6 billion
Gains on securities of $0.5 billion
A restructuring related charge of $0.1 billion
Medical Devices includes:
A restructuring related charge of $0.3 billion
An in-process research and development expense of $0.9 billion
A Medical Device Regulation charge of $0.2 billion
Litigation expense of $0.1 billion

(4)    Consumer Health includes:
Litigation expense of $3.9 billion, primarily talc related reserves and certain settlements.
Pharmaceutical includes:
Litigation expense of $0.8 billion, primarily related to the agreement in principle to settle opioid litigation
An unrealized gain on securities of $0.5 billion
A restructuring related charge of $0.1 billion
Medical Devices includes:
A contingent consideration reversal of $1.1 billion related to the timing of certain developmental milestones associated with the Auris Health acquisition.
Litigation expense of $0.3 billion
A restructuring related charge of $0.3 billion
An in-process research and development expense of $0.2 billion
A Medical Device Regulation charge of $0.1 billion
(5)     Consumer Health includes:
A gain of $0.3 billion related to the Company's previously held equity investment in DR. CI:LABO
Litigation expense of $0.4 billion
A restructuring related charge of $0.1 billion
Pharmaceutical includes:
Litigation expense of $4.3 billion of which $4.0 billion is related to the agreement in principle to settle opioid litigation
An in-process research and development expense of $0.9 billion related to the Alios asset
A research and development expense of $0.3 billion for an upfront payment related to argenx
An unrealized gain on securities of $0.6 billion
(1)
Amounts not allocated to segments include interest (income) expense and general corporate (income) expense.
(2)
General corporate includes cash, cash equivalents and marketable securities.
(3)
The Consumer segment includes a gain of $0.3 billion related to the Company's previously held equity investment in DR. CI:LABO, litigation expense of $0.4 billion and a restructuring charge of $0.1 billion. The Pharmaceutical segment includes litigation expense of $4.3 billion including $4.0 billion related to the agreement in principle to settle opioid litigation (see Note 21 to the Consolidated Financial Statements for additional information regarding the opioid litigation), an in-process research and development expense of $0.9 billion related to the Alios asset, a research and development expense of $0.3 billion for an upfront payment related to argenx, an unrealized gain on securities of $0.6 billion, Actelion acquisition related costs of $0.2 billion and a restructuring charge of $0.1 billion. The Medical Devices segment includes a gain of $2.0 billion from the divestiture of the ASP business, a restructuring related charge of $0.4 billion, litigation expense of $0.4 billion and Auris Health acquisition related costs of $0.1 billion.
(4)
The Consumer segment includes a gain of $0.3 billion from the divestiture of NIZORAL® and litigation expense of $0.3 billion. The Pharmaceutical segment includes an in-process research and development charge of $1.1 billion related to the Alios and XO1 assets and the corresponding XO1 contingent liability reversal of $0.2 billion, Actelion acquisition related costs of $0.2 billion, unrealized loss on securities of $0.2 billion and a gain of $0.2 billion from the divestiture of certain non-strategic Pharmaceutical products. The Medical Devices segment includes net litigation expense of $1.7 billion, a restructuring related charge of $0.6 billion, AMO acquisition related costs of $0.1 billion and a gain of $0.5 billion from the divestiture of the LifeScan business.
(5)
The Pharmaceutical segment includes $0.8 billion for Actelion acquisition and integration related costs, an in-process research and development expense of $0.4 billion and litigation expense of $0.1 billion. The Medical Devices segment includes litigation expense of $1.1 billion, a restructuring related charge of $0.8 billion, an asset impairment of $0.2 billion primarily related to the insulin pump business and $0.1 billion for AMO acquisition related costs. The Medical Devices segment includes a gain of $0.7 billion from the divestiture of Codman Neurosurgery. The Consumer segment includes a gain of $0.5 billion from the divestiture of COMPEED®.
(6)
Long-lived assets include property, plant and equipment, net for 2019, and 2018 of $17,658 and $17,035, respectively, and intangible assets and goodwill, net for 2019 and 2018 of $81,282 and $78,064, respectively.


7883



Actelion acquisition and integration related costs of $0.2 billion
19.Selected Quarterly Financial Data (unaudited)
Selected unaudited quarterly financial data forA restructuring charge of $0.1 billion
Medical Devices includes:
A gain of $2.0 billion from the years divestiture of the ASP business
2019A restructuring related charge of $0.4 billion
Litigation expense of $0.4 billion
Auris Health acquisition and integration related costs of $0.1 billion
(6) Long-lived assets include property, plant and 2018 are summarized below:equipment, net for fiscal years 2021, and 2020 of $18,962 and $18,766, respectively, and intangible assets and goodwill, net for fiscal years 2021 and 2020 of $81,638 and $89,795, respectively.

18.Acquisitions and Divestitures
  2019 2018
(Dollars in Millions Except Per Share Data) 
First Quarter (1)
 
Second Quarter (2)
 
Third Quarter (3)
 
Fourth Quarter (4)
 
First Quarter (5)
 
Second Quarter (6)
 
Third Quarter (7)
 
Fourth Quarter (8)
Segment sales to customers  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
Consumer $3,318
 3,544
 3,469
 3,567
 3,398
 3,504
 3,415
 3,536
Pharmaceutical 10,244
 10,529
 10,877
 10,548
 9,844
 10,354
 10,346
 10,190
Medical Devices  6,459
 6,489
 6,383
 6,632
 6,767
 6,972
 6,587
 6,668
Total sales 20,021
 20,562
 20,729
 20,747
 20,009
 20,830
 20,348
 20,394
Gross profit 13,406
 13,622
 13,862
 13,613
 13,395
 13,903
 13,759
 13,433
Earnings before provision for taxes on income 4,422
 7,041
 1,647
 4,218
 5,481
 4,973
 4,423
 3,122
Net earnings 3,749
 5,607
 1,753
 4,010
 4,367
 3,954
 3,934
 3,042
Basic net earnings per share $1.41
 2.11
 0.67
 1.52
 1.63
 1.47
 1.47
 1.14
Diluted net earnings per share $1.39
 2.08
 0.66
 1.50
 1.60
 1.45
 1.44
 1.12
During fiscal year 2021, the Company did not make any material acquisitions.

(1)
The first quarter of 2019 includes a gain of $0.3 billion after-tax ($0.3 billion before-tax) related to the Company's previously held equity investment in DR. CI:LABO, an in-process research and development expense of $703 million after-tax ($890 million before-tax) related to the Alios asset, a litigation expense of $342 million after-tax ($423 million before-tax), an unrealized gain on securities of $125 million after-tax ($158 million before-tax), a restructuring related charge of $75 million after-tax ($90 million before-tax), and acquisition related costs of $60 million after-tax ($67 million before-tax).
(2)
The second quarter of 2019 includes a gain of $1.5 billion after-tax ($2.0 billion before-tax) from the divestiture of the ASP business, a litigation expense of $342 million after-tax ($409 million before-tax), an unrealized gain on securities of $117 million after-tax ($148 million before-tax), a restructuring related charge of $116 million after-tax ($142 million before-tax) and acquisition related costs of $50 million after-tax ($55 million before-tax).
(3)
The third quarter of 2019 includes a litigation expense of $3,080 million after-tax ($4,000 million before-tax) related to the agreement in principle to settle opioid litigation, a restructuring related charge of $106 million after-tax ($128 million before-tax), acquisition related costs of $88 million after-tax ($107 million before-tax), a $391 million benefit after-tax from the impact of tax legislation, and an unrealized loss on securities of $71 million after-tax ($89 million before-tax).
(4)
The fourth quarter of 2019 includes a litigation expense of $251 million after-tax ($264 million before-tax), an unrealized gain on securities of $277 million after-tax ($350 million before-tax), a restructuring related charge of $214 million after-tax ($251 million before-tax), a $184 million benefit after-tax from the impact of tax legislation, and acquisition related costs of $82 million after-tax ($90 million before-tax).
(5)
The first quarter of 2018 includes an Actelion acquisition related cost of $92 million after-tax ($96 million before-tax) and a restructuring related charge of $81 million after-tax ($107 million before-tax).
(6)
The second quarter of 2018 includes a litigation expense of $609 million after-tax ($703 million before-tax) and a restructuring related charge of $152 million after-tax ($176 million before-tax).
(7)
The third quarter of 2018 includes an in-process research and development expense of $859 million after-tax ($1,126 million before-tax) related to the Alios and XO1 assets and the corresponding XO1 contingent liability reversal of $184 million after and before tax, a restructuring related charge of $162 million after-tax ($190 million before-tax) and a $265 million benefit after-tax from the impact of tax legislation.
(8)
The fourth quarter of 2018 includes a litigation expense of $1,113 million after-tax ($1,288 million before-tax), a restructuring related charge of $190 million after-tax ($227 million before-tax) and a $137 million benefit after-tax from the impact of tax legislation.



79



20.Acquisitions and Divestitures
CertainDuring fiscal year 2020, certain businesses were acquired for $5.8$7.3 billion in cash and $1.4$0.4 billion of liabilities assumed during 2019.assumed. These acquisitions were accounted for using the acquisition method and, accordingly, results of operations have been included in the financial statements from their respective dates of acquisition.
The 2019excess of purchase price over the estimated fair value of tangible assets acquired amounted to $7.5 billion and has been assigned to identifiable intangible assets, with any residual recorded to goodwill.
The fiscal year 2020 acquisitions primarily included: DR. CI:LABO, a Japanese company focused onall rights to the marketing, development and distribution of a broad range of dermocosmetic, cosmetic and skincare products; Auris Health,investigational compound bermekimab, which has multiple dermatological indications, along with certain employees from XBiotech Inc. a privately held developer of robotic technologies, initially focused in lung cancer, with an FDA-cleared platform currently used in bronchoscopic diagnostic and therapeutic procedures and Taris Biomedical LLC(XBiotech), Momenta Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (Momenta), a company specializingthat discovers and develops novel therapies for immune-mediated diseases and the outstanding shares in Verb Surgical Inc., a company with significant robotics and data science capabilities.
During the fiscal first quarter of 2020, the Company completed the acquisition of all rights to the investigational compound bermekimab, which has multiple dermatological indications, along with certain employees from XBiotech Inc., for a purchase price of $0.8 billion. The fair value of the acquisition was allocated primarily to non-amortizable intangible assets, primarily IPR&D, for $0.8 billion applying a probability of success factor that ranged from 20% to 60% to reflect inherent development, regulatory and commercial risk for the different indications. The discount rate applied was approximately 16%. XBiotech may be eligible to receive additional payments upon the receipt of certain commercialization authorizations. The transaction was accounted for as a business combination and included in the Pharmaceutical segment. On January 28, 2022, subsequent to the fiscal year 2021, additional information regarding efficacy became available which led the Company to the decision to terminate the development of a novelbermekimab for Atopic Dermatitis (AD). The Company recorded an intangible asset impairment charge of approximately $0.6 billion related to an in-process research and development asset, bermekimab (JnJ-77474462), an investigational drug delivery technology for the treatment of bladder diseases including cancer.AD and Hidradenitis Suppurativa (HS). The impairment charge is related to the AD indication and is a nonrecognized subsequent event and will be reflected in the first quarter 2022 financial statements. The Company also acquired all rights to bermekimab from XBiotech, Inc. in fiscal year 2020.
Additionally, in the fiscal first quarter of 2020, the Company completed the acquisition of all outstanding shares in Verb Surgical Inc., a company with significant robotics and data science capabilities, including those shares previously held by Verily. The transaction was accounted for as a business combination and included in the Medical Devices segment. The fair value of the acquisition was allocated primarily to non-amortizable intangible assets, primarily IPR&D, for $0.4 billion, goodwill for $0.2 billion, other assets of JointPoint,$0.2 billion and liabilities assumed of $0.3 billion. The fair value of the Company's previously held equity investment in Verb Surgical Inc., was $0.4 billion.
On October 1, 2020, the Company completed the acquisition of Momenta for a privately held company, with navigation softwarepurchase price of approximately $6.1 billion, net of cash acquired. The fair value of the acquisition was allocated primarily to improve surgical outcomesnon-amortizable intangible assets (IPR&D) of $6.0 billion, goodwill of $1.2 billion, other assets of $0.5 billion and liabilities of $1.6 billion. The assets acquired are intended to address substantial unmet medical need in hip replacement.maternal-fetal disorders, neuro-inflammatory disorders, rheumatology, dermatology and autoimmune hematology. Depending on the asset, probability of success factors ranging from 20% to 77% were used in the fair value calculation to reflect inherent development and regulatory risk of the IPR&D. The discount rate applied was approximately 13%. The goodwill is primarily attributable to synergies expected to arise from the business acquisition and is not expected to be deductible for tax purposes. The transaction was accounted for as a business combination and included in the Pharmaceutical segment.
During fiscal year 2019 certain businesses were acquired for $5.8 billion in cash and $1.4 billion of liabilities assumed. These acquisitions were accounted for using the acquisition method and, accordingly, results of operations have been included in the financial statements from their respective dates of acquisition.
The excess of purchase price over the estimated fair value of tangible assets acquired amounted to $6.8 billion and has been assigned to identifiable intangible assets, with any residual recorded to goodwill.
The fiscal year 2019 acquisitions primarily included DR. CI:LABO, a Japanese company focused on the marketing, development and distribution of a broad range of dermocosmetic, cosmetic and skincare products and Auris Health, Inc. a
84


privately held developer of robotic technologies, initially focused in lung cancer, with an U.S. FDA-cleared platform currently used in bronchoscopic diagnostic and therapeutic procedures.
On January 17, 2019, the Company acquired DR. CI:LABO, a Japanese company focused on the marketing, development and distribution of a broad range of dermocosmetic, cosmetic and skincare products for a total purchase price of approximately ¥230 billion, which equates to approximately $2.1 billion, using the exchange rate of 109.06 Japanese Yen to each U.S. Dollar on January 16, 2019. The acquisition was completed through a series of transactions that included an all-cash tender offer to acquire the publicly held shares not already held by the Company for ¥5,900 per share. The Company previously held a 20% ownership in DR. CI:LABO. As of June 2019, the Company became the legal owner of DR. CI:LABO with the completion of the tender offer procedure in Japan. The acquired company was then delisted from the Tokyo Stock Exchange. Additionally, in the fiscal first quarter of 2019, the Company recognized a pre-tax gain recorded in Other (income) expense, net, of approximately $0.3 billion related to the Company's previously held equity investment in DR. CI:LABO.
The Company treated this transaction as a business combination and included it in the Consumer Health segment. The allocationDuring the fiscal first quarter of 2020, the Company finalized the purchase price included in the current period balance sheet is based on the best estimate of management and is preliminary and subject to change. At December 29, 2019, theallocation. The final fair value of the acquisition was allocated primarily to amortizable intangible assets for $1.5 billion, goodwill for $1.2 billion and liabilities of $0.4 billion subject to any subsequent valuation adjustments within the measurement period. The adjustments made since the date of acquisition were $0.1 billion to intangible assets, accrued liabilities, deferred taxes on income and property, plant and equipment with the offset to goodwill.billion. The amortizable intangible assets were comprised of brand/trademarks and customer relationships with a weighted average life of 15.3 yearsyears. The goodwill is primarily attributable to synergies expected to arise from the business acquisition and is not expected to be deductible for tax purposes.
On April 1, 2019 the Company completed the acquisition of Auris Health, Inc. for approximately $3.4 billion, net of cash acquired. Additional contingent payments of up to $2.35 billion, in the aggregate, may be payable upon reaching certain predetermined milestones. Auris Health was a privately held developer of robotic technologies, initially focused in lung cancer, with ana U.S. FDA-cleared platform currently used in bronchoscopic diagnostic and therapeutic procedures. The Company treated this transaction as a business combination and included it in the Medical Devices segment. The fair value of the acquisition was allocated primarily to amortizable and non-amortizable intangible assets, primarily IPR&D for $3.0 billion, goodwill for $2.0 billion, marketable securities of $0.2 billion and liabilities assumed of $1.8 billion, which includes the fair value of the contingent payments mentioned above, subjectabove. The goodwill is primarily attributable to any subsequent valuation adjustments withinsynergies expected to arise from the measurement period. Asbusiness acquisition and is not expected to be deductible for tax purposes. During the fiscal second quarter of December 29, 2019 there were no valuation adjustments. The fair value2020, the Company finalized the purchase price allocation. During fiscal 2020, the Company recorded Other income of approximately $1.1 billion for the reversal of all of the contingent consideration was $1.1 billion.related to the timing of certain developmental and commercial milestones, which are not expected to be met based on the Company’s current timelines. During the fiscal third quarter of 2020, the Company recorded a partial IPR&D impairment charge of $0.1 billion related to timing and progression of the digital surgery platforms. In the fiscal third quarter of 2021, the Company recorded a partial IPR&D charge of $0.9 billion primarily related to expected development delays in the general surgery digital robotics platform (Ottava). A probability of success factor ranging from 55%18% to 95%66% across Ottava sub-platforms, was used in the fair value calculation to reflect inherent regulatory and commercial risk of the contingent payments and IPR&D. The discount rate applied was approximately 10%. The goodwill is primarily attributable to synergies expected to arise from the business acquisition and is not expected to be deductible for tax purposes.
On December 20, 2019, the Company announced the agreement to acquire Verily's stake in Verb Surgical Inc. The transaction closed in the fiscal first quarter of 2020 and Verb Surgical Inc. is now a subsidiary of Johnson & Johnson.
On December 30, 2019, subsequent to the fiscal year end, the Company completed the acquisition of all rights to the investigational compound bermekimab, which has multiple dermatological indications, along with certain employees from XBiotech Inc., for a purchase price of $0.8 billion. XBiotech may be eligible to receive additional payments upon the receipt of certain commercialization authorizations. The transaction will be accounted for as a business combination and included in the Pharmaceutical segment.
During 2018 certain businesses were acquired for $0.9 billion in cash and $0.1 billion of liabilities assumed during 2018. These acquisitions were accounted for using the acquisition method and, accordingly, results of operations have been included in the financial statements from their respective dates of acquisition.
The 2018 acquisitions primarily included: Zarbee’s, Inc., a privately held company that is a leader in naturally-based consumer healthcare products; BeneVir Biopharm, Inc. (BeneVir), a privately-held, biopharmaceutical company specializing in the development of oncolytic immunotherapies and Orthotaxy, a privately-held developer of software-enabled surgery technologies, including a differentiated robotic-assisted surgery solution. The Company also acquired the assets of Medical Enterprises Distribution LLC, a privately held healthcare technology firm focused on surgical procedure innovation.

80



The excess of purchase price over the estimated fair value of tangible assets acquired amounted to $1.0 billion and has been assigned to identifiable intangible assets, with any residual recorded to goodwill.
During 2017 certain businesses were acquired for $35.2 billion in cash and $1.8 billion of liabilities assumed. These acquisitions were accounted for using the acquisition method and, accordingly, results of operations have been included in the financial statements from their respective dates of acquisition.
The 2017 acquisitions primarily included: Actelion Ltd, an established leading franchise of differentiated, innovative products for pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH); Abbott Medical Optics (AMO), a wholly-owned subsidiary of Abbott Laboratories, which included ophthalmic products related to: cataract surgery, laser refractive surgery and consumer eye health; Neuravi Limited, a privately-held medical device company that develops and markets medical devices for neurointerventional therapy; TearScience Inc., a manufacturer of products dedicated to treating meibomian gland dysfunction; Sightbox, Inc., a privately-held company that developed a subscription vision care service that connects consumers with eye care professionals and a supply of contact lenses; Torax Medical, Inc., a privately-held medical device company that manufactures and markets the LINX™ Reflux Management System for the surgical treatment of gastroesophageal reflux disease and Megadyne Medical Products, Inc., a privately-held medical device company that develops, manufactures and markets electrosurgical tools.
The excess of purchase price over the estimated fair value of tangible assets acquired amounted to $34.4 billion and has been assigned to identifiable intangible assets, with any residual recorded to goodwill. Of this amount, approximately $1.1 billion has been identified as the value of IPR&D, primarily associated with the acquisition of Actelion Ltd. The value of the IPR&D was calculated using cash flow projections discounted for the inherent risk in the projects.
During 2017, the Company completed the acquisition of Actelion Ltd through an all cash tender offer in Switzerland for $280 per share, amounting to $29.6 billion, net of cash acquired. As part of the transaction, immediately prior to the completion of the acquisition, Actelion spun out its drug discovery operations and early-stage clinical development assets into a newly created Swiss biopharmaceutical company, Idorsia Ltd. The shares of Idorsia are listed on the SIX Swiss Exchange (SIX). In 2017 the Company held 9.9% of the shares of Idorsia and had rights to an additional 22.1% of Idorsia equity through a convertible loan with a principal amount of approximately $0.5 billion. As a result of Idorsia raising additional capital in July 2018, the Company currently holds 9.0% of the shares of Idorsia and has rights to an additional 20.8% of Idorsia equity through a convertible loan with a carrying value and a principal amount of approximately $0.5 billion. The convertible loan may be converted into38,715,114 Idorsia shares, subject to certain restrictions, as follows: (i) up to an aggregate shareholding of 16% of Idorsia shares as a result of certain shareholders holding more than 20% of the issued Idorsia shares, and (ii) up to the balance of the remaining amount within 20 business days of the maturity date of the convertible loan, which has a 10 year term, or if Idorsia undergoes a change of control transaction. At the maturity of the loan, if the remaining amount has not yet been converted, Idorsia may elect to settle the remaining amount in cash or in ordinary shares of Idorsia. The equity investment in Idorsia and the convertible loan are recorded in Other assets in the Company's consolidated Balance Sheet. The Company also exercised the option acquired on ACT-132577, a product within Idorsia being developed for resistant hypertension currently in phase 3of clinical development. The Company has also entered into an agreement to provide Idorsia with a Swiss franc denominated credit facility of approximately $250 million. As of December 29, 2019, Idorsia has not made any draw-downs under the credit facility. Actelion has established a leading franchise of differentiated, innovative products for pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) that are highly complementary to the existing portfolio of the Company. The addition of Actelion’s specialty in-market medicines and late-stage products is consistent with the Company's efforts to grow in attractive and complementary therapeutic areas and serve patients with serious illnesses and significant unmet medical need.

81



During the fiscal second quarter of 2018, the Company finalized the purchase price allocation for Actelion to the individual assets acquired and liabilities assumed using the acquisition method. The following table presents the amounts recognized for assets acquired and liabilities assumed as of the acquisition date with adjustments made through the second quarter of 2018:

(Dollars in Millions)
Cash & Cash equivalents469
Inventory(1)
759
Accounts Receivable485
Other current assets93
Property, plant and equipment104
Goodwill6,161
Intangible assets25,010
Deferred Taxes99
Other non-current assets19
Total Assets Acquired33,199
Current liabilities956
Deferred Taxes1,776
Other non-current liabilities413
Total Liabilities Assumed3,145
Net Assets Acquired30,054
(1) Includes adjustment of $642 million to write-up the acquired inventory to its estimated fair value.
The adjustments made since the date of acquisition were $0.2 billion to the deferred taxes and $0.4 billion to the current liabilities with the offset to goodwill. The assets acquired are recorded in the Pharmaceutical segment. The acquisition of Actelion resulted in approximately $6.2 billion of goodwill. The goodwill is primarily attributable to synergies expected to arise from the acquisition. The goodwill is not expected to be deductible for tax purposes.

The purchase price allocation to the identifiable intangible assets is as follows:
(Dollars in Millions)  
Intangible assets with definite lives:  
Patents and trademarks* $24,230
Total amortizable intangibles 24,230
   
In-process research and development 780
Total intangible assets $25,010

*Includes $0.4 billion related to VALCHLOR®, one of the acquired products, which was divested in the fiscal second quarter of 2018.
The patents and trademarks acquired are comprised of developed technology with a weighted average life of 9 years and was primarily based on the patent life of the marketed products. The intangible assets with definite lives were assigned asset lives ranging from 4 to 10 years. The in-process research and development intangible assets were valued for technology programs for unapproved products.
The value of the IPR&D was calculated using probability adjusted cash flow projections discounted for the risk inherent in such projects. The discount rate applied was 9%9.5%.
The acquisition was accounted for using the acquisition method and, accordingly, the results of operations of Actelion were reported in the Company's financial statements beginning on June 16, 2017, the date of acquisition. For the year ended December 31, 2017, total sales and a net loss for Actelion from the date of acquisition were $1.4 billion and $1.4 billion, respectively.
The following table provides pro forma results of operations for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2017, as if Actelion had been acquired as of January 4, 2016. The pro forma results include the effect of certain purchase accounting adjustments such as the estimated changes in depreciation and amortization expense on the acquired tangible and intangible assets. However, pro forma results do not include any anticipated cost savings or other effects of the planned integration of Actelion.

82



Accordingly, such amounts are not necessarily indicative of the results if the acquisition had occurred on the dates indicated or which may occur in the future.
Unaudited Pro forma Consolidated Results
(Dollars in Millions Except Per Share Data)2017
Net Sales77,681
Net Earnings1,509
Diluted Net Earnings per Common Share0.55


The Company recorded Actelion acquisition related costs before tax of approximately $0.2 billion, $0.2 billion and $0.8 billion in 2019, 2018 and 2017, respectively, which was recorded in Other (income)/expense and Cost of products sold.
During 2017, the Company acquired Abbott Medical Optics (AMO), a wholly-owned subsidiary of Abbott Laboratories, for $4.3 billion, net of cash acquired. The acquisition included ophthalmic products related to: cataract surgery, laser refractive surgery and consumer eye health. The net purchase price was primarily recorded as amortizable intangible assets for $2.3 billion and goodwill for $1.7 billion. The weighted average life of total amortizable intangibles, the majority being customer relationships, is approximately 14.4 years. The goodwill is primarily attributable to synergies expected to arise from the business acquisition and is not deductible for tax purposes. The intangible assets and goodwill amounts are based on the final purchase price allocation. The assets acquired were recorded in the Medical Devices segment.
In 2012, the Company completed the acquisition of Synthes, Inc. for a purchase price of $20.2 billion in cash and stock. In connection with the acquisition of Synthes, Inc. the Company entered into two accelerated share repurchase (ASR) agreements. In 2013, the Company settled the remaining liabilities under the ASR agreements. While the Company believes that the transactions under each ASR agreement and a series of related internal transactions were consummated in a tax efficient manner in accordance with applicable law, it is possible that the Internal Revenue Service could assert one or more contrary positions to challenge the transactions from a tax perspective. If challenged, an amount up to the total purchase price for the Synthes shares could be treated as subject to applicable U.S. tax at approximately the statutory rate to the Company, plus interest.
With the exception of the Actelion Ltd acquisition, supplemental pro forma information for 2019, 2018 and 2017 in accordance with U.S. GAAP standards related to business combinations, and goodwill and other intangible assets, supplemental pro forma information for fiscal years 2021, 2020 and 2019 is not provided, as the impact of the aforementioned acquisitions did not have a material effect on the Company’s results of operations, cash flows or financial position.

Divestitures
During fiscal year 2021, in separate transactions, the Company divested two brands outside the U.S. within the Pharmaceutical segment. The Company recognized a pre-tax gain recorded in Other (income) expense, net, of approximately $0.6 billion.
During fiscal year 2020, the Company sold 11.8 million shares of Idorsia LTD (Idorsia), or its 8.3% ownership in the company at that time. The transaction resulted in gross proceeds of approximately CHF 337 million ($357 million) based on a sales price of CHF 28.55/share and resulted in an immaterial net loss. At the end of fiscal 2020, the Company had rights to approximately 38.7 million shares through a convertible loan with a principal amount of CHF 445 million (due June 2027). During fiscal year 2021, the Company converted CHF 110 million ($120 million) of this loan into approximately 9.6 million shares of Idorsia which were reflected at fair value as of January 2, 2022. During the fiscal third quarter of 2021, the Company's undrawn credit facility with Idorsia was terminated.
During fiscal year 2019, the Company divested its Advanced Sterilization Products (ASP)ASP business to Fortive Corporation for an aggregate value of approximately $2.8 billion, consisting of $2.7 billion of cash proceeds and $0.1 billion of retained net receivables. As of December 30, 2018, the assets held for sale on the Consolidated Balance Sheet were $0.2 billion of inventory, $0.1 billion of property, plant and equipment, net and $0.3 billion of goodwill. The Company recognized a pre-tax gain recorded in Other (income)( income) expense, net, of approximately $2.0 billion.
During 2018, the Company divested the LifeScan Inc business for approximately $2.1 billion and retained certain net liabilities. Other divestitures in 2018 included: NIZORAL®, RoC® and certain non-strategic Pharmaceutical products. In 2018, the pre-tax gains on the divestitures were approximately $1.2 billion.
In 2018, the Company accepted a binding offer to form a strategic collaboration with Jabil Inc., one of the world’s leading manufacturing services providers for health care products and technology products. The Company is expanding a 12-year relationship with Jabil to produce a range of products within the Ethicon Endo-Surgery and DePuy Synthes businesses. This transaction includes the transfer of employees and manufacturing sites. The majority of the transfers were completed in 2019 with a minor amount remaining in 2020. As of December 29, 2019, the assets held for sale on the Consolidated Balance Sheet were $0.1 billion of inventory and property, plant and equipment, net. As of December 30, 2018, the assets held for sale on the Consolidated Balance Sheet were $0.3 billion of inventory and $0.1 billion of property, plant and equipment, net. For additional details on the global supply chain restructuring see Note 22 to the Consolidated Financial Statements.
During 2017, the Company divestitures primarily included: the Codman Neurosurgery business, to Integra LifeSciences Holdings Corporation and the divestiture of COMPEED19.® to HRA Pharma. In 2017, the pre-tax gains on the divestitures were approximately $1.3 billion.Legal Proceedings

83



21.Legal Proceedings
Johnson & Johnson and certain of its subsidiaries are involved in various lawsuits and claims regarding product liability,liability; intellectual property, commercial, supplierproperty; commercial; indemnification and other matters; governmental investigations; and other legal proceedings that arise from time to time in the ordinary course of their business. Due to the ongoing impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic, certain trials have been rescheduled or delayed. The Company continues to monitor its legal proceedings as the situation evolves and in person trials resume.

85


The Company records accruals for loss contingencies associated with these legal matters when it is probable that a liability will be incurred, and the amount of the loss can be reasonably estimated. As of December 29, 2019,January 2, 2022, the Company has determined that the liabilities associated with certain litigation matters are probable and can be reasonably estimated. The Company has accrued for these matters and will continue to monitor each related legal issue and adjust accruals as might be warranted based on new information and further developments in accordance with ASC 450-20-25. For these and other litigation and regulatory matters discussed below for which a loss is probable or reasonably possible, the Company is unable to estimate the possible loss or range of loss beyond the amounts already accrued. Amounts accrued for legal contingencies often result from a complex series of judgments about future events and uncertainties that rely heavily on estimates and assumptions including timing of related payments. The ability to make such estimates and judgments can be affected by various factors including, among other things, whether damages sought in the proceedings are unsubstantiated or indeterminate; scientific and legal discovery has not commenced or is not complete; proceedings are in early stages; matters present legal uncertainties; there are significant facts in dispute; procedural or jurisdictional issues; the uncertainty and unpredictability of the number of potential claims; ability to achieve comprehensive multi-party settlements; complexity of related cross-claims and counterclaims; and/or there are numerous parties involved. To the extent adverse awards, judgments or verdicts have been rendered against the Company, the Company does not record an accrual until a loss is determined to be probable and can be reasonably estimated.

In the Company'sCompany’s opinion, based on its examination of these matters, its experience to date and discussions with counsel, the ultimate outcome of legal proceedings, net of liabilities accrued in the Company'sCompany’s balance sheet, is not expected to have a material adverse effect on the Company'sCompany’s financial position. However, the resolution of, or increase in accruals for, one or more of these matters in any reporting period may have a material adverse effect on the Company'sCompany’s results of operations and cash flows for that period.

PRODUCT LIABILITY

Johnson & Johnson and certain of its subsidiaries are involved in numerous product liability claims and lawsuits involving multiple products. Claimants in these cases seek substantial compensatory and, where available, punitive damages. While the Company believes it has substantial defenses, it is not feasible to predict the ultimate outcome of litigation. From time to time, even if it has substantial defenses, the Company considers isolated settlements based on a variety of circumstances. The Company has established accruals for product liability claims and lawsuits in compliance with ASC 450-20 based on currently available information, which in some cases may be limited. The Company accrues an estimate of the legal defense costs needed to defend each matter when those costs are probable and can be reasonably estimated. For certain of these matters, the Company has accrued additional amounts such as estimated costs associated with settlements, damages and other losses. Product liability accruals can represent projected product liability for thousands of claims around the world, each in different litigation environments and with different fact patterns. Changes to the accruals may be required in the future as additional information becomes available.

The most significant of these cases include: the DePuy ASR™ XL Acetabular System and DePuy ASR™ Hip Resurfacing System; the PINNACLE® Acetabular Cup System; pelvic meshes; RISPERDAL®; XARELTO®; body powders containing talc, primarily JOHNSONSJOHNSON'S® Baby Powder; INVOKANA®; and ETHICON PHYSIOMESH® Flexible Composite Mesh. As of December 29, 2019,January 2, 2022, in the United States there were approximately 1,100250 plaintiffs with direct claims in pending lawsuits regarding injuries allegedly due to the DePuy ASR™ XL Acetabular System and DePuy ASR™ Hip Resurfacing System; 10,3005,300 with respect to the PINNACLE® Acetabular Cup System; 17,60010,100 with respect to pelvic meshes; 11,9008,800 with respect to RISPERDAL®; 29,0005,500 with respect to XARELTO®; 17,90040,400 with respect to body powders containing talc; 400100 with respect to INVOKANA®;and 3,3004,700 with respect to ETHICON PHYSIOMESH® Flexible Composite Mesh.

In August 2010, DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. (DePuy) announced a worldwide voluntary recall of its ASR XL Acetabular System and DePuy ASR Hip Resurfacing System used in hip replacement surgery. Claims for personal injury have been made against DePuy and Johnson & Johnson. The number of pending lawsuits is expected to fluctuate as certain lawsuits are settled or dismissed and additional lawsuits are filed.

In August 2010, DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. (DePuy) announced a worldwide voluntary recall of its ASR XL Acetabular System and DePuy ASR Hip Resurfacing System (ASR Hip) used in hip replacement surgery. Claims for personal injury have been made against DePuy and Johnson & Johnson. Cases filed in federal courts in the United States have been organized as a multi-district litigation in the United States District Court for the Northern District of Ohio. Litigation has also been filed in countries outside of the United States, primarily in the United Kingdom, Canada, Australia, Ireland, Germany, India and Italy. In November 2013, DePuy reached an agreement with a Court-appointed committee of lawyers representing ASR Hip System plaintiffs to establish a program to settle claims with eligible ASR Hip patients in the United States who had surgery to replace their ASR Hips, known as revision surgery, as of August 31, 2013. DePuy reached additional agreements in February 2015 and March 2017, which further extended the settlement program to include ASR Hip patients who had revision surgeries after

84



August 31, 2013 and prior to February 15, 2017. This settlement program has resolved more than 10,000 claims, thereforethereby bringing to resolution significant ASR Hip litigation activity in the United States. However, lawsuits in the United States remain, and the settlement program does not address litigation outside of the United States. In Australia, a class action settlement was reached that resolved the claims of the majority of ASR Hip patients in that country. In Canada, the Company has reached agreements to settle two pendingthe class actions which have been approved by the Québec Superior Court and the Supreme Court of British Columbia.filed in that country. The Company continues to receive information with respect to potential additional
86


costs associated with this recall on a worldwide basis. The Company has established accruals for the costs associated with the United States settlement program and DePuy ASR Hip-related product liability litigation.

Claims for personal injury have also been made against DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson (collectively, DePuy) relating to the PINNACLE® Acetabular Cup System used in hip replacement surgery. Product liability lawsuits continue to be filed, and the Company continues to receive information with respect to potential costs and the anticipated number of cases. Cases filed in federal courts in the United States have been organized as a multi-district litigation in the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas. Litigation also has also been filed in some state courts and in countries outside of the United States. Several adverse verdicts have been rendered against DePuy, one of which was reversed on appeal and remanded for retrial. During the first quarter of 2019, DePuy established a United States settlement program to resolve these cases. As part of the settlement program, adverse verdicts have been settled. The Company has established an accrual for product liability litigation associated with the PINNACLE® Acetabular Cup System and the related settlement program.

Claims for personal injury have been made against Ethicon, Inc. (Ethicon) and Johnson & Johnson arising out of Ethicon'sEthicon’s pelvic mesh devices used to treat stress urinary incontinence and pelvic organ prolapse. The Company continues to receive information with respect to potential costs and additional cases. Cases filed in federal courts in the United States had been organized as a multi-district litigation (MDL) in the United States District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia. In March 2021, the MDL Court entered an order closing the MDL. The MDL Court is remandinghas remanded cases for trial to the jurisdictions where the case was originally filed and additional pelvic mesh lawsuits have been filed, and remain, outside of the MDL. The Company has settled or otherwise resolved athe majority of the United States cases and the estimated costs associated with these settlements and the remaining cases are reflected in the Company'sCompany’s accruals. In addition, class actions and individual personal injury cases or claims seeking damages for alleged injury resulting from Ethicon’s pelvic mesh devices have been commenced in various countries outside of the United States, including claims and cases in the United Kingdom, the Netherlands and Belgium, and class actions in Israel, Australia and Canada, seeking damages for alleged injury resulting from Ethicon's pelvic mesh devices.Canada. In November 2019, the Federal Court of Australia issued a judgment regarding its findings with respect to liability in relation to the three Lead Applicants and generally in relation to the design, manufacture, pre and post-market assessments and testing, and supply and promotion of the devices in Australia used to treat stress urinary incontinence and pelvic organ prolapse. Orders determiningIn March 2020, the Court issued a decision and entered damages amounts to be awardedawards to the three Lead Applicants are expectedApplicants. The Company appealed the decision to the intermediate appellate court, the Full Court. The appeal was heard in February 2021 and, in March 2021, the first quarterFull Court entered a judgment dismissing the appeal. An application for special leave to the High Court of 2020. With respectAustralia was filed in April 2021, and the High Court heard oral argument on the application in November 2021. Special leave was refused. While this brings an end to other group members,the appellate process, there will now be an individual case assessment process which will require prooffor the remaining group member claims. The parties currently are in discussions with the Court to determine the form and mechanism of use and causally related loss.that individual case assessment process. The next hearing is scheduled for late February 2022. The class actions in Canada are expected to bewere discontinued in 2020 as a result of a settlement of a group of cases and an agreement to resolve the Israeli class action was reached in May 2021. The parties in the Israeli class action are currently negotiating the wording and some of the terms thereof and once finalized, the settlement will be subject to court approvalapproval. The parties are due to update the court on the status of the discontinuance.finalization of the settlement negotiations by the end of February 2022. The Company has established accruals with respect to product liability litigation associated with Ethicon'sEthicon’s pelvic mesh products.

Following a June 2016 worldwide market withdrawal of ETHICON PHYSIOMESH® Flexible Composite Mesh (Physiomesh), claims for personal injury have been made against Ethicon, Inc. (Ethicon) and Johnson & Johnson alleging personal injury arising out of the use of this hernia mesh device. Cases filed in federal courts in the United States have been organized as a multi-district litigation (MDL) in the United States District Court for the Northern District of Georgia. A multi-county litigation (MCL) also has also been formed in New Jersey state court and assigned to Atlantic County for cases pending in New Jersey. In addition to the matters in the MDL and MCL, there are additional lawsuits pending in the United States District Court for the Southern District of Ohio, which are part of the MDL for polypropylene mesh devices manufactured by C.R. Bard, Inc., one multi-plaintiff lawsuit pending in Oklahoma state court and lawsuits pending outside the United States. In May 2021, Ethicon and lead counsel for the plaintiffs entered into a term sheet to resolve approximately 3,600 Physiomesh cases (covering approximately 4,300 plaintiffs) pending in the MDL and MCL at that time. A master settlement agreement (MSA) was entered into in September 2021 and includes 3,729 cases in the MDL and MCL. All deadlines and trial settings in those proceedings are currently stayed pending the completion of the settlement agreement. The deadline for issuance of Individual Allocation amounts by the Special Master is March 2022. The costs associated with this proposed settlement are reflected in the Company’s accruals. Post-Settlement cases in the Physiomesh MDL and MCL are subject to docket control orders requiring early expert reports and discovery requirements. As of February 2022, there are approximately 90 active cases subject to these orders which are being reviewed and evaluated.

Along with ETHICON PHYSIOMESH® lawsuits, there were a number of filings related toClaims have also been filed against Ethicon and Johnson & Johnson alleging personal injuries arising from the PROCEED® Mesh and PROCEED® Ventral Patch hernia mesh products. In March 2019, the New Jersey Supreme Court entered an order consolidating all PROCEED® and PROCEED® Ventral Patchthese cases pending in New Jersey as an MCL in Atlantic County Superior Court. Additional cases have been filed in various federal and state courts in the US,United States, and in jurisdictions outside the US. The Company continuesUnited States. Discovery is underway in the MCL proceedings.
87



Ethicon and Johnson & Johnson also have been subject to receive information with respectclaims for personal injuries arising from the PROLENE™ Polypropylene Hernia System. In January 2020, the New Jersey Supreme Court created an MCL in Atlantic County Superior Court to potential costshandle such cases. Cases involving this product have also been filed in other federal and state courts in the anticipated number of cases. United States.

The Company has established accruals with respect to product liability litigation associated with ETHICON PHYSIOMESH® Flexible Composite Mesh, PROCEED® Mesh and PROCEED® Ventral Patch, products. In September 2019, plaintiffs’ attorney filed an application with the New Jersey Supreme Court seeking centralized management of 107and PROLENE™ Polypropylene Hernia System cases.   The New Jersey Supreme Court granted plaintiffs application in January 2020 and those will be transferred to an MCL in Atlantic County Superior Court.products.


85



Claims for personal injury have been made against Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson arising out of the use of RISPERDAL®, and related compounds, indicated for the treatment of schizophrenia, acute manic or mixed episodes associated with bipolar I disorder and irritability associated with autism, and related compounds.autism. Lawsuits primarily have been primarily filed in state courts in Pennsylvania, California, and Missouri. Other actions are pending in various courts in the United States and Canada. Product liability lawsuits continue to be filed, and the Company continues to receive information with respect to potential costs and the anticipated number of cases. The Company has successfully defended a number of these cases but there have been verdicts against the Company, including a recent verdict in October 2019 of $8$8.0 billion of punitive damages related to one single plaintiff, which was subsequentlythe trial judge reduced in January 2020 to $6.8 million byin January 2020. In September 2021, the trial judge. The Company will appealentered into a settlement in principle with the final judgment. The Company has settled or otherwise resolved manycounsel representing plaintiffs in this matter and in substantially all of the outstanding cases in the United States cases and theStates. The costs associated with thesethis and other settlements are reflected in the Company'sCompany’s accruals.

Claims for personal injury arising out of the use of XARELTO®, an oral anticoagulant, have been made against Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (JPI); Johnson & Johnson (J&J);Johnson; and JPI'sJPI’s collaboration partner for XARELTO®, Bayer Healthcare AG, and certain of its affiliates. Cases filed in federal courts in the United States have been organized as a multi-district litigation in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana. In addition, cases have been filed in state courts across the United States. Many of these cases have beenwere consolidated into a state mass tort litigation in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania and in a coordinated proceeding in Los Angeles, California. Class action lawsuits also have been filed in Canada. In March 2019, JPI and J&JJohnson & Johnson announced an agreement in principle to the settle the XARELTO® cases in the United States; the settlement agreement was executed in May 2019, and the settlement became final in December 2019.2019, and the settlement was funded in January 2020. This will resolveresolved the majority of cases pending in the United States. The Company has established accruals for its costs associated with the United States settlement program and XARELTO® related product liability litigation.

PersonalA significant number of personal injury claims alleging that talc causes cancer have beenwere made against Johnson & Johnson Consumer Inc. and Johnson & Johnson arising out of the use of body powders containing talc, primarily JOHNSON’S® Baby Powder. The number of pending product liabilitythese personal injury lawsuits, continues to increase, and the Company continues to receive information with respect to potential costs and the anticipated number of cases. Lawsuits have been primarily filed in state courts in Missouri, New Jersey and California, as well as outside the United States. Cases filed in federal courts in the United States have been organized as a multi-district litigation inwell as outside of the United States, continued to increase through fiscal year 2021.

In talc cases that previously have gone to trial, the Company has obtained a number of defense verdicts, but there also have been verdicts against the Company, many of which have been reversed on appeal. In June 2020, the Missouri Court of Appeals reversed in part and affirmed in part a July 2018 verdict of $4.7 billion in Ingham v. Johnson & Johnson, et al., No. ED 207476 (Mo. App.), reducing the overall award to $2.1 billion. An application for transfer of the case to the Missouri Supreme Court was subsequently denied and in June 2021, a petition for certiorari, seeking a review of the Ingham decision by the United States Supreme Court, was denied. In June 2021, the Company paid the award, which, including interest, totaled approximately $2.5 billion. The facts and circumstances, including the terms of the award, were unique to the Ingham decision and not representative of other claims brought against the Company. The Company continues to believe that it has strong legal grounds to contest the other talc verdicts that it has appealed. Notwithstanding the Company’s confidence in the safety of its talc products, in certain circumstances the Company has settled cases.

In October 2021, Johnson & Johnson Consumer Inc. (Old JJCI) implemented a corporate restructuring (the 2021 Corporate Restructuring). As a result of that restructuring, Old JJCI ceased to exist and three new entities were created: (a) LTL Management LLC, a North Carolina limited liability company (LTL or Debtor); (b) Royalty A&M LLC, a North Carolina limited liability company and a direct subsidiary of LTL (RAM); and (c) the Debtor’s direct parent, Johnson & Johnson Consumer Inc., a New Jersey company (New JJCI). The Debtor received certain of Old JJCI’s assets and became solely responsible for the talc-related liabilities of Old JJCI, including all liabilities related in any way to injury or damage, or alleged injury or damage, sustained or incurred in the purchase or use of, or exposure to, talc, including talc contained in any product, or to the risk of, or responsibility for, any such damage or injury, except for any liabilities for which the exclusive remedy is provided under a workers’ compensation statute or act (the Talc-Related Liabilities).

In October 2021, notwithstanding the Company’s confidence in the safety of its talc products, the Debtor filed a voluntary petition with the United States Bankruptcy Court for the Western District of North Carolina, Charlotte Division, seeking relief under chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code (the LTL Bankruptcy Case). As a result of the LTL Bankruptcy Case, the Court entered a temporary restraining order staying all litigation against LTL and Old JJCI. On November 15, 2021, the North
88


Carolina Bankruptcy Court confirmed the scope of the stay, issuing a Preliminary Injunction (PI) prohibiting and enjoining the commencement and prosecution of talc-related claims against LTL, Old JJCI, New JJCI, Johnson & Johnson, other of their corporate affiliates, identified retailers, insurance companies, and certain other parties. The LTL Bankruptcy Case was transferred to the United States Bankruptcy Court for the District of New Jersey. InJersey in November 2021, and that court subsequently extended the multi-districtPI through the end of February 2022. Claimants have filed a motion to dismiss the LTL Bankruptcy Case. The court commenced a hearing on February 14, 2022 regarding the motion to dismiss and on whether the PI should be extended. While the PI effectively stays all of the Company’s talc-related personal injury litigation, LTL has agreed to lift the partiesautomatic stay on a small number of appeals where appeal bonds have moved to exclude experts, known as Daubert motions. The Court held Daubert hearings in mid-July 2019 and a final round of briefing has been submitted to the Court. The parties are awaiting a decision. filed.

The Company has successfully defendedagreed to provide funding to LTL for the payment of amounts the Bankruptcy Court determines are owed by LTL through the establishment of a number$2 billion trust in furtherance of these cases but there have been verdicts against the Company, including a verdict in July 2018 of $4.7 billion. The Company believes that it has strong grounds on appeal to overturn these verdicts.this purpose. The Company has established an accrual primarilya reserve for defense costsapproximately $2 billion in connection with product liability litigation associated with body powders containing talc.the aforementioned trust. Subsequent to the fiscal third quarter of 2021, the Company de-consolidated LTL, which is a related party, as a result of the bankruptcy filing. The impact of the de-consolidation is not material to the Company. The parties have not yet been able to reach a resolution of all matters related to talc, and while certain amounts under various scenarios have recently been referred to in testimony as part of the LTL bankruptcy proceedings, the Company is unable to estimate the possible loss or range of loss beyond the amount accrued.

In February 2019, the Company’s talc supplier, Imerys Talc America, Inc. and two of its affiliates, Imerys Talc Vermont, Inc. and Imerys Talc Canada, Inc. (collectively, Imerys) filed a voluntary petition under chapter 11 petition commencing a reorganization underof the United States Code (the Bankruptcy CodeCode) in the United States Bankruptcy Court for the District of Delaware (Imerys Bankruptcy). The Imerys Bankruptcy relates to Imerys’Imerys’s potential liability for personal injury from exposure to talcum powder sold by Imerys (Talc Claims). In its bankruptcy, filing, Imerys noted certain claims it alleges it has claims against the Company for indemnification and rights to joint insurance proceeds. BasedIn May 2020, Imerys, its parent Imerys S.A., the Tort Claimants’ Committee (TCC), and the Future Claimants’ Representative (FCR) (collectively, the Plan Proponents) filed their Plan of Reorganization (the Plan) and the Disclosure Statement related thereto. The Plan Proponents have since filed numerous amendments to the Plan and Disclosure Statement. A hearing on such claims as well as indemnitythe Plan Proponent’s Disclosure Statement was held in January 2021, and insurance claimsthe Court entered an order approving the Disclosure Statement, allowing Imerys to proceed with soliciting votes on the Plan. In March 2021, the Company has against Imerys,voted to reject the Company petitioned the United States District Court for the District of Delaware to establish federal jurisdiction of the state court talc lawsuits under the Bankruptcy Code.  The Company's petition was deniedPlan and the state court talc lawsuits that have been removed to federal court on such basis have been remanded.   The Company formally proposed to resolve Imerys' and the Company’s obligations arisingopted out of the consensual releases in the Plan. In April 2021, the Plan Proponents announced the Plan had received the requisite number of accepting votes to confirm the Plan. The Company challenged certain improprieties with respect to portions of the vote and sought to disqualify those votes. In October 2021, the Bankruptcy Court issued a ruling deeming thousands of votes as withdrawn as improperly voted. In October 2021, Imerys cancelled the confirmation hearing on the Plan. Imerys, the TCC, the FCR, and certain of Imerys’s insurers (the Mediation Parties) have since agreed to engage in mediation.

In July 2021, Imerys commenced an adversary proceeding against the Company in the Imerys Bankruptcy (the Imerys adversary proceeding). The Imerys adversary proceeding sought, among other things, certain declarations with respect to the indemnification obligations allegedly owed by the Company to Imerys. The TCC and FCR simultaneously filed a motion for temporary restraining order and preliminary injunction seeking to enjoin the Company from undergoing a corporate restructuring that would separate the Company’s talc liabilities from its other assets. The Bankruptcy Court denied the motion. The Company thereafter filed a motion to dismiss the adversary proceeding. The Bankruptcy Court has not yet decided the motion to dismiss. In October 2021, the Company filed a Notice of Bankruptcy Filing and Stay of Proceedings clarifying that the automatic stay arising upon the filing of the LTL Bankruptcy Case should apply to the Imerys adversary proceeding.

In June 2020, Cyprus Mines Corporation and its parent (together, Cyprus), which had owned certain Imerys talc mines, filed an adversary proceeding against the Company and Imerys in the Imerys Bankruptcy seeking a declaration of indemnity rights under certain contractual agreements (the Cyprus adversary proceeding). The Company denies such indemnification is owed, and filed a motion to dismiss the adversary complaint. In February 2021, Cyprus filed a voluntary petition for relief under chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code and filed its Disclosure Statement and Plan. The Plan contemplates a settlement with Imerys and talc claimants where Cyprus would make a monetary contribution to a trust established under the Imerys Plan in exchange for an injunction against Talc Claims by agreeingasserted against it. Cyprus has not yet sought approval of its Disclosure Statement and Plan. Cyprus, along with the TCC and FCR appointed in the Cyprus chapter 11 case, have agreed to assumeparticipate in the defensemediation with the Mediation Parties. In October 2021, the Company filed a Notice of Bankruptcy Filing and Stay of Proceedings clarifying that the automatic stay arising upon the filing of the LTL Bankruptcy Case should apply to the Cyprus adversary proceeding.

In February 2021, several of the Company’s insurers involved in coverage litigation of all Talc Claims involvingin New Jersey State Court (the Coverage Action) filed a motion in the Company's products, liftingImerys Bankruptcy Court proceeding seeking a determination that the automatic stay does not apply to the Coverage Action and, in the alternative, seeking relief from the automatic stay to enableallow them to continue to litigate their claims in the Talc Claims to proceed outside the bankruptcy forum withCoverage Action. In March 2021, the Company agreeingfiled a limited response and reservation of rights with respect to settle or pay any judgment against Imerys,the motion. The Court entered an agreed order modifying the stay to allow the litigation in the Coverage Action to continue. In October 2021, LTL filed a Notice of Bankruptcy Filing and waivingStay of Proceedings clarifying that the Company’s indemnification claims against Imerys. Discussions between Imerys andautomatic stay arising upon the Company on this issue remain ongoing. filing of the LTL Bankruptcy Case should apply to the Coverage Action.

89


In February 2018, a securities class action lawsuit was filed against Johnson & Johnson and certain named officers in the United States District Court for the District of New Jersey, alleging that Johnson & Johnson violated the federal securities laws by failing to adequately disclose the alleged asbestos contamination in body powders containing talc, primarily JOHNSON'SJOHNSON’S® Baby Powder, and that purchasers of Johnson & Johnson’s shares suffered losses as a result. Plaintiffs arePlaintiff is seeking damages. In April 2019, the Company moved to dismiss the complaint and briefing on the motion was complete as of August 2019. In December 2019, the Court denied, in part, the motion to dismiss. In March 2020, the Company answered the complaint. In April 2021, briefing on Plaintiffs’ motion for class certification was completed. In July 2021, the Company filed a notice of supplemental authority in opposition to Plaintiff’s motion for class certification, and Plaintiff filed a response. In December 2021, the Company filed a motion to supplement the class certification record, and in January 2022, Plaintiff responded. Discovery is ongoing.

In October 2018, a shareholder derivative lawsuit was filed against Johnson & Johnson as the nominal defendant and its current directors as defendants in the United States District Court for the District of New Jersey, alleging a breach of fiduciary duties related to the alleged asbestos contamination in body powders containing talc, primarily JOHNSON’S® Baby Powder, and that Johnson & Johnson has suffered damages as a result of those alleged breaches. In June 2019, thea shareholder filed an additional

86



a complaint initiating a summary proceeding in New Jersey state court for a books and records inspection. In August 2019, Johnson & Johnson responded to the books and records complaint and filed a cross motion to dismiss. In September 2019, Plaintiff replied and the Court heard oral argument. TheIn February 2022, the Court has not yet ruledgranted Johnson & Johnson's cross motion to dismiss. In October 2019, December 2019, and January 2020, four shareholders filed four separate derivative lawsuits against Johnson & Johnson as the nominal defendant and its current directors and certain officers as defendants in the books and records action. In September 2019, the United States District Court for the District of New Jersey, granted defendants’alleging a breach of fiduciary duties related to the alleged asbestos contamination in body powders containing talc, primarily JOHNSON’S® Baby Powder, and that Johnson & Johnson has suffered damages as a result of those alleged breaches. In February 2020, the four cases were consolidated into a single action under the caption In re Johnson & Johnson Talc Stockholder Derivative Litigation. In July 2020, a report was delivered to the Company’s Board of Directors by independent counsel retained by the Board to investigate the allegations in the derivative lawsuits and in a series of shareholder letters that the Board received raising similar issues and demanding that suit be brought against certain Directors. Four of the shareholders who sent demands are plaintiffs in the In re Johnson & Johnson Talc Stockholder Derivative Litigation. The independent counsel recommended that the Company reject the shareholder demands and take the steps that are necessary or appropriate to secure dismissal of the derivative lawsuits. The Board unanimously adopted the recommendations of the independent counsel’s report. In October 2020, the shareholders filed a consolidated complaint, and in January 2021, Johnson & Johnson moved to dismiss the consolidated complaint. In March 2021, Plaintiffs filed a motion for discovery. The Court temporarily terminated Johnson & Johnson’s motion to dismiss pending a decision on Plaintiff’s motion for discovery. In November 2021, at the shareholder derivative lawsuit, and dismissedCourt’s request, the complaint without prejudice. In October 2019, the shareholder filed a notice of appeal with the United States Court of Appealsparties submitted supplemental briefing on Plaintiff’s motion for the Third Circuit. In January 2020, the shareholder voluntarily dismissed his appeal, with prejudice. Four additional shareholder derivative lawsuits have been filed in New Jersey making similar allegations against the Company and its current directors and certain officers.discovery.

In January 2019, two ERISA class action lawsuits were filed by participants in the Johnson & Johnson Savings Plan against Johnson & Johnson, its Pension and Benefits Committee, and certain named officers in the United States District Court for the District of New Jersey, alleging that the defendants breached their fiduciary duties by offering Johnson & Johnson stock as a Johnson & Johnson Savings Plan investment option when it was imprudent to do so because of failures to disclose alleged asbestos contamination in body powders containing talc, primarily JOHNSON’S®Baby Powder. Plaintiffs are seeking damages and injunctive relief. In September 2019, Defendants have filed a motion to dismiss. In April 2020, the Court granted Defendants’ motion but granted leave to amend. In June 2020, Plaintiffs filed an amended complaint, and in July 2020, Defendants moved to dismiss the amended complaint. As of October 2020, briefing on Defendants’ motion was complete. In February 2021, the Court granted Defendants’ motion, and granted Plaintiffs leave to amend. In April 2021, Plaintiffs informed the Court that they did not intend to file an amended complaint, and the Court dismissed the case with prejudice. In May 2021, Plaintiffs filed a notice of appeal with the Third Circuit. In July 2021, Plaintiffs filed their opening brief in the Third Circuit and in September 2021, Defendants filed their response brief, and in October 2021, Plaintiffs filed their reply brief. In January 2022, the Third Circuit heard oral argument.

A lawsuit is pending inwas brought against the United States District Court for the Central District of California alleging violations of Proposition 65, California’s Unfair Competition Law and False Advertising Law concerning JOHNSON’S® Baby Powder. In June 2019, plaintiffs filed a motion for voluntary dismissal of this Proposition 65 action and the Company opposed such motion to the extent it would allow plaintiffs’ counsel to refile such claims with new plaintiffs. The Court granted plaintiff’s motion conditioned upon payment of attorneys’ fees and costs. The Court entered its award of attorneys’ fees and costs in October 2019 and the case was dismissed without prejudice. Another lawsuit alleging violations of Proposition 65, California’s Consumer Legal Remedies Act relating to JOHNSON’S® Baby Powder was filed in the Superior Court of California for the County of San Diego.Diego alleging violations of California’s Consumer Legal Remedies Act (CLRA) relating to JOHNSON’S® Baby Powder. In that lawsuit, the plaintiffs allege that Johnson & Johnson violated the CLRA by failing to provide required Proposition 65 warnings. In July 2019, the Company filed a notice of removal to the United States District Court for the Southern District of California and plaintiffs filed a second amended complaint shortly thereafter. In October 2019, the Company moved to dismiss the second amended complaint for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted, primarily on the basis that the plaintiffs failed to comply with Proposition 65’s mandatory pre-suit notice requirement, which applies even when a plaintiff asserts only an indirect Proposition 65 claim.granted. In response to those motions, plaintiffs filed a third amended complaint. In December 2019, the Company moved to dismiss the third amended complaint for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted. In April 2020, the Court granted the motion to dismiss but granted leave to amend. In May 2020, plaintiffs filed a Fourth Amended Complaint but indicated that they would be filing a motion for leave to file a fifth amended complaint. Plaintiffs filed a Fifth Amended Complaint in August 2020. The Company moved to dismiss the Fifth Amended Complaint for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted. In January 2021, the Court issued an Order and opinion ruling in the Company’s favor and granting the motion to dismiss with prejudice. In February 2021, Plaintiffs filed a Notice of Appeal with the Ninth Circuit. Plaintiffs filed their opening brief in July 2021. The company filed its responsive brief in October 2021. In October 2021, Notice of Suggestion of Bankruptcy was filed with the Ninth Circuit. A bankruptcy stay was imposed in December 2021, and the Court held the reply deadline in abeyance.

In addition, the Company has received preliminary inquiries, subpoenas, and subpoenasrequests to produce documents regarding thesetalc matters, including from Senator Murray, a member of the Senate Committee on Health, Education, Labor and Pensions, the Department of Justice, the Securities and Exchange Commission and the U.S. Congressional Subcommittee on Economic and Consumer Policy.Policy of the House Committee on Oversight and Reform, the Senate
90


Committee on the Judiciary, the House Committee on Oversight and Reform, and individual Members of Congress. The Company is cooperatinghas produced documents and responded to inquiries, and will continue to cooperate with government inquiries and continues to produce documents in response.     inquiries.

Claims for personal injury have been made against a number of Johnson & Johnson companies, including Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson, arising out of the use of INVOKANA®, a prescription medication indicated to improve glycemic control in adults with Type 2 diabetes. LawsuitsIn December 2016, lawsuits filed in federal courts in the United States have beenwere organized as a multi-district litigation in the United States District Court for the District of New Jersey. Cases have also been filed in state courts. Class action lawsuits have been filed in Canada. Product liability lawsuits continue to be filed, and the Company continues to receive information with respect to potential costs and the anticipated number of cases. The Company has settled or otherwise resolved many of the cases and claims in the United States and the costs associated with these settlements are reflected in the Company'sCompany’s accruals.

Claims for personal injury have been made against a number of Johnson & Johnson companies, including Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson, arising out of the use of ELMIRON®, a prescription medication indicated for the relief of bladder pain or discomfort associated with interstitial cystitis. These lawsuits, which allege that ELMIRON® contributes to the development of permanent retinal injury and vision loss, have been filed in both state and federal courts across the United States. In December 2020, lawsuits filed in federal courts in the United States, including putative class action cases seeking medical monitoring, were organized as a multi-district litigation in the United States District Court for the District of New Jersey. Cases also have been filed in various state courts. In addition, three class action lawsuits have been filed in Canada. Product liability lawsuits continue to be filed, and the Company continues to receive information with respect to potential costs and the anticipated number of cases. The Company has established accruals for defense costs associated with ELMIRON® related product liability litigation.

INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY
Certain subsidiaries of Johnson & Johnson are subject, from time to time, to legal proceedings and claims related to patent, trademark and other intellectual property matters arising out of their businesses. Many of these matters involve challenges to the coverage and/or validity of the patents on various products and allegations that certain of the Company’s products infringe the patents of third parties. Although these subsidiaries believe that they have substantial defenses to these challenges and allegations with respect to all significant patents, there can be no assurance as to the outcome of these matters. A loss in any of these cases could adversely affect the ability of these subsidiaries to sell their products, result in loss of sales due to loss of market exclusivity, require the payment of past damages and future royalties, and may result in a non-cash impairment charge for any associated intangible asset. The most significant of theseSignificant matters are described below.


87



Medical Devices
In March 2013, Medinol Ltd. (Medinol) filed a patent infringement lawsuit against Cordis Corporation (Cordis) and Johnson & Johnson in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York alleging that Cordis’s sales of the CYPHER and CYPHER SELECT stents made in the United States since 2005 willfully infringed four of Medinol's patents directed to the geometry of articulated stents. Although Johnson & Johnson has since sold Cordis, it has retained liability for this case. After the trial in January 2014, the district court dismissed the case, finding Medinol unreasonably delayed bringing its claims (the laches defense). In September 2014, the district court denied a motion by Medinol to vacate the judgment and grant it a new trial. Medinol appealed the decision to the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit. In March 2017, the United States Supreme Court held that the laches defense is not available in patent cases. In April 2018, the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit remanded the case back to the district court to reconsider Medinol’s motion for a new trial. In March 2019, the district court denied Medinol’s motion for a new trial. In April 2019, Medinol filed a notice of appeal.

In November 2016, MedIdea, L.L.C. (MedIdea) filed a patent infringement lawsuit against DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. in the United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois alleging infringement by the ATTUNE® Knee System. In April 2017, MedIdea filed an amended complaint adding DePuy Synthes Products, Inc. and DePuy Synthes Sales, Inc. as named defendants (collectively, DePuy). MedIdea alleges infringement of United States Patent Nos. 6,558,426 (’426); 8,273,132 (’132); 8,721,730 (’730) and 9,492,280 (’280) relating to posterior stabilized knee systems. Specifically, MedIdea alleges that the SOFCAMTM Contact feature of the ATTUNE® posterior stabilized knee products infringes the patents-in-suit. MedIdea is seeking monetary damages and injunctive relief. In June 2017, the case was transferred to the United States District Court for the District of Massachusetts. A claim construction hearing was held in October 2018, and a claim construction order was issued in November 2018. In December 2018, MedIdea stipulated to non-infringement of the ’132, ’730 and ’280 patents, based on the district court’s claim construction and reserving its right to appeal that construction, leaving only the ’426 patent at issue before the district court. In January 2019, the district court stayed the case pending a decision in the Inter Partes Review proceeding on the ’426 patent (see below). In December 2017, DePuy Synthes Products, Inc. filed a petition for Inter Partes Review with the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO), seeking to invalidate the two claims of the ’426 patent asserted in the district court litigation, and in June 2018, the USPTO instituted review of those claims. A hearing was held in March 2019, and in April 2019, the USPTO issued its decision upholding the validity of the patent. In May 2019, DePuy filed a motion for summary judgment of non-infringement of the claims of the ’426 patent. In November 2019, judgment was entered in favor of Depuy. In December 2019, MedIdea filed a notice of appeal.

In December 2016, Ethicon Endo-Surgery, Inc. and Ethicon Endo-Surgery, LLC (now known as Ethicon LLC) sued Covidien, Inc. in the United States District Court for the District of Massachusetts seeking a declaration that United States Patent Nos. 6,585,735 (the ’735 patent); 7,118,587; 7,473,253; 8,070,748 and 8,241,284 (the ’284 patent), are either invalid or not infringed by Ethicon’s ENSEAL® X1 Large Jaw Tissue Sealer product. In April 2017, Covidien LP, Covidien Sales LLC, and Covidien AG (collectively, Covidien) answered and counterclaimed, denying the allegations, asserting willful infringement of the ’735 patent, the ’284 patent and United States Patent Nos. 8,323,310 (the ’310 patent); 9,084,608; 9,241,759 (the ’759 patent) and 9,113,882, and seeking damages and an injunction. Covidien filed a motion for preliminary injunction, which was denied in October 2017. The parties have entered joint stipulations such that only the ’310 patent and the ’759 patent remain in dispute. Trial began in September 2019, and closing arguments will be heard in March 2020.

In December 2016, Dr. Ford Albritton sued Acclarent, Inc. (Acclarent) in United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas alleging that Acclarent’s RELIEVA® Spin and RELIEVEA SpinPlus® products infringe U.S. Patent No. 9,011,412 (the ’412 patent).9,011,412. Dr. Albritton also alleges breach of contract, fraud and that he is the true owner of Acclarent’s U.S. Patent No. 8,414,473. In December 2016, Acclarent filed a petition for Inter Partes Review (IPR) with the United States PatentTrial began in October 2021, and Trademark Office (USPTO) challenging the validity of the ’412 patent. The USPTO instituted the IPR in July 2017. In July 2018, the USPTO ruled in favor of Albritton in the IPR, finding that Acclarent had not met its burden of proof that the challenged claims were invalid. In October 2019, the Court of Appeals affirmed the USPTO’s Patent Trial and Appeal Board. In June 2019,shortly thereafter, the parties reached an agreement to settle the case. Plaintiff’s motion to dismiss with prejudice was filed cross motions for summary judgment in the district court and the parties are awaiting a decision.October 2021. The district court trial is scheduled for April 2020.case was dismissed with prejudice in November 2021.

In November 2017, Board of Regents, The University of Texas System and TissueGen, Inc. (collectively, UT) filed a lawsuit in the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas against Ethicon, Inc. and Ethicon US, LLC alleging the manufacture and sale of VICRYL® Plus Antibacterial Sutures, MONOCRYL® Plus Antibacterial Sutures, PDS® Plus Antibacterial Sutures, STRATAFIX® PDS® Antibacterial Sutures and STRATAFIX® MONOCRYL® Plus Antibacterial Sutures infringe plaintiffs’ United States Patent Nos. 6,596,296 and 7,033,603 (the ’603 patent) directed to implantable polymer drug releasing biodegradable fibers containing a therapeutic agent. UT is seeking damages and an injunction. In December 2018, Ethicon filed petitions with the USPTO, seeking Inter Partes Review (IPR) of both asserted patents. Those petitions have been stayed by the USPTO pending a decision by the U.S. Supreme Court in an unrelated case. UT dismissed the ’603 patent from

88



the suit and no longer accuses PDS® Plus Antibacterial Sutures or STRATAFIX® PDS® Plus Antibacterial Sutures of infringement. The district court trial is scheduled for June 2020.

In August 2018, Intuitive Surgical, Inc. and Intuitive Surgical Operations, Inc. (“Intuitive”)(collectively, Intuitive) filed a patent infringement suit against Auris Health, Inc. (“Auris”)(Auris) in United States District Court for the District of Delaware. In the suit, Intuitive alleges willful infringement of U.S. Patent Nos. 6,246,200 (’200 patent)(’200); 6,491,701 (’701 patent)(’701); 6,522,906 (’906 patent)(’906); 6,800,056 (’056 patent)(’056); 8,142,447 (’447 patent)(’447); 8,620,473 (’473 patent)(’473); 8,801,601 (’601 patent)(’601); and 9,452,276 (’276 patent)(’276) based on Auris’ Monarch™ Platform. Auris filed IPR Petitions for Inter Partes Review with the USPTOU.S. Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) regarding the ’200, ’056, ’601 ’701, ’447, ’276 and ’906 patents. Intuitive subsequently dropped the ’200, ’473 and ’701 patents from the suit. In December 2019, the USPTO instituted review of the ’601 patent and denied review of the ’056 patent. The district court trialIn February and March 2020, the USPTO instituted review of the ’200, ’447, ’701 and ’906 patents and denied review of the ’276 patent. In December 2020, the USPTO declared all of the challenged claims in the ’601 patent to be invalid. Intuitive has appealed that decision. In March 2021, the USPTO ruled that the challenged claims of the ’447 and ’906 patents are not invalid. Auris has appealed that decision. Auris filed a request for reexamination of the ’276 patent in November 2021, and in January 2022, the USPTO granted the reexamination request. Trial is scheduled to begin in January 2021.2023.

In August 2019, RSB Spine LLC (“RSB Spine”)(RSB Spine) filed a patent infringement suit against DePuy Synthes, Inc. in the United States District Court for the District of Delaware. In October 2019, RSB Spine amended the complaint to change the named defendants to DePuy Synthes Sales, Inc. and DePuy Synthes Products, Inc. In the suit, RSB Spine alleges willful infringement of United States Patent Nos. 6,984,234 and 9,713, 5379,713,537 by one or more of the following products: ZERO-P-VA™ Spacer, ZERO-P® Spacer, ZERO-P NATURAL™ Plate, SYNFIX® LR Spacer and SYNFIX® Evolution System. RSB Spine seeks
91


monetary damages and injunctive relief. In November 2019, the suit was consolidated for pre-trial purposes with other patent infringement suits brought by RSB Spine in the United States District Court for the District of Delaware against Life Spine, Inc., Medacta USA, Inc., and Precision Spine, Inc., A stay that had been entered pending Inter Partes Review at the U.S. Patent & Trademark Office has been lifted, and Xtant Medical Holdings, Inc.trial is scheduled to begin in December 2022.

Pharmaceutical
In August 2016, Sandoz Ltd and Hexal AG (collectively, Sandoz) filed a lawsuit in the English High Court against G.D. SearleMarch 2020, Osteoplastics, LLC a Pfizer company (Searle) and Janssen Sciences Ireland UC (JSI) alleging that Searle’s supplementary protection certificate SPC/GB07/038 (SPC), which is exclusively licensed to JSI, is invalid and should be revoked. Janssen-Cilag Limited sells PREZISTA® (darunavir) in the United Kingdom pursuant to this license. In October 2016, Searle and JSI counterclaimed against Sandoz for threatened infringement of the SPC based on statements of its plans to launch generic darunavir in the United Kingdom. Sandoz admitted that its generic darunavir product would infringe the SPC if it is found valid. Searle and JSI are seeking an order enjoining Sandoz from marketing its generic darunavir before the expiration of the SPC. Following a trial in April 2017, the court entered a decision holding that the SPC is valid and granting a final injunction. Sandoz has appealed the court’s decision and the injunction is stayed pending the appeal. In January 2018, the court referred the issue on appeal to the Court of Justice for the European Union (CJEU) and stayed the proceedings pending the CJEU’s ruling on the issue. In December 2019, the parties entered into a settlement agreement.

In April 2018, Acerta Pharma B.V., AstraZeneca UK Ltd and AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP filed a patent infringement lawsuitsuit against DePuy Synthes, Inc., DePuy Synthes Products, Inc., Medical Device Business Services, Inc., and Synthes, Inc. (collectively, DePuy Synthes) in the United States District Court for the District of Delaware against Pharmacyclics LLCDelaware. In the suit, Osteoplastics alleges willful infringement of U.S. Patent Nos. 8,781,557; 9,929,920; 9,330,206; 9,626,756; 9,672,617; 9,672,302; and Abbvie Inc. (collectively, Abbvie), alleging that9,275,191 based on the manufacturePROPLAN CMF® Virtual Surgical Planning Services and sale of IMBRUVICAthe TruMatch® infringesCMF Personalize Solutions. In April 2020, Osteoplastics filed an amended complaint to substitute U.S. Patent No. 7,459,554. Janssen Biotech, Inc., which commercializes IMBRUVICA® jointly with Abbvie, intervened in9,292,920 for U.S. Patent No. 9,929,920. Osteoplastics seeks monetary damages and injunctive relief. In June 2020, DePuy Synthes filed a motion to dismiss the action in November 2018.complaint. In October 2019,2020, the parties entered into a settlement agreement.Court dismissed Medical Device Business Services, Inc. from the case but otherwise denied the motion. In June 2021, Osteoplastics admitted that the PROPLAN CMF® Virtual Surgical Planning Services do not infringe any asserted patents. Trial was scheduled for October 2022. In October 2021, the case was settled and dismissed.

REMICADE® Related Cases

In August 2014, Celltrion Healthcare Co. Ltd.October 2020, Rasmussen Instruments, LLC (Rasmussen) filed a patent infringement suit against DePuy Synthes Products, Inc., DePuy Synthes Sales, Inc. and CelltrionMedical Device Business Services, Inc. (collectively, Celltrion) filed an application with the United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for approval to make and sell its own infliximab biosimilar. In March 2015, Janssen Biotech, Inc. (JBI) filed a lawsuitDePuy) in the United States District Court for the District of Massachusetts against CelltrionMassachusetts. Rasmussen alleges that DePuy willfully infringes U.S. Patent Nos. 9,492,180 and Hospira Healthcare Corporation (Hospira), which has exclusive marketing rights10,517,583 (’583) by making and selling the Attune® Balanced Sizer. In April 2021, Rasmussen sought permission to amend its infringement contentions to allege that DePuy also willfully infringes the ’583 patent by making and selling the Attune® Balancing Blocks. Rasmussen seeks treble damages for Celltrion’s infliximab biosimilar in the United States, seeking, among other things, a declaratory judgment that their biosimilar product infringes or potentially infringes several JBI patents, including United States Patent No. 6,284,471 relating to REMICADE® (infliximab) (the ’471 patent) and United States Patent No. 7,598,083 (the ’083 patent) directed to the cell culture media used to make Celltrion’s biosimilar. In August 2016, the district court granted both Celltrion’s and Hospira’s motions for summary judgment of invalidity of the ’471 patent. JBI appealed those decisions to the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit. In January 2018, the Federal Circuit dismissed the appeal as moot based on its affirmance of a decision by the USPTO’s Patentwillful infringement. Trial and Appeal Board affirming invalidity of the ’471 patent.

In June 2016, JBI filed two additional patent infringement lawsuits asserting the ’083 patent, one against Celltrion and Hospira in the United States District Court for the District of Massachusetts and the other against HyClone Laboratories, Inc., the manufacturer of the cell culture media that Celltrion uses to make its biosimilar product, in the United States District Court for the District of Utah. JBI seeks monetary damages and other relief. In October 2017, the district court in the Massachusetts

89



action denied Celltrion and Hospira’s motion to dismiss for lack of standing. In July 2018, the district court in the Massachusetts action granted Celltrion’s motion for summary judgment of non-infringement and entered an order dismissing the ’083 lawsuit against Celltrion and Hospira. JBI appealed to the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit, and Celltrion and Hospira cross-appealed on the standing issue. A hearing on the appeal and cross-appeal is scheduled for March 2020. The litigation against HyClone in Utah is stayed pending the outcome of the Massachusetts actions.February 2022.

The FDA approved the first infliximab biosimilar for sale in the United States in 2016, and a number of such products have been launched.

Pharmaceutical
Litigation Against Filers of Abbreviated New Drug Applications (ANDAs)

The following summarizes lawsuits pendingthe Company’s subsidiaries have brought against generic companies that have filed Abbreviated New Drug Applications (ANDAs)ANDAs with the U.S. FDA or undertaken similar regulatory processes outside of the United States, seeking to market generic forms of products sold by various subsidiaries of Johnson & Johnson prior to expiration of the applicable patents covering those products. These ANDAs typically include allegations of non-infringement and invalidity of the applicable patents. In the event the Company’s subsidiaries are not successful in an action, or the automatic statutory stay of the ANDAs expires before the United States District Court rulings are obtained, the third-partygeneric companies involved would have the ability, upon approval of the U.S. FDA, to introduce generic versions of their products to the market, resulting in the potential for substantial market share and revenue losses for the applicable products, and which may result in a non-cash impairment charge in any associated intangible asset. In addition, from time to time, the Company’s subsidiaries may settle these types of actions and such settlements can involve the introduction of generic versions of the products at issue to the market prior to the expiration of the relevant patents. The Inter Partes Review (IPR) process with the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO),USPTO, created under the 2011 America Invents Act, is also being used at times by generic companies in conjunction with ANDAs and lawsuits, to challenge the applicable patents.
ZYTIGA®
In July 2015,ZYTIGA®

Beginning in January 2019, Janssen Biotech, Inc., and Janssen Oncology, Inc. and Janssen Research & Development, LLC (collectively, Janssen) and BTG International Ltd. (BTG) initiated a patent infringement lawsuit (the main action)Statements of Claim under Section 6 of the Patented Medicines (Notice of Compliance) Regulations in the United States District Court for the District of New JerseyCanada against a number of generic companies (and certain of their affiliates and/or suppliers) who filed ANDAs seeking approval to market a generic version of ZYTIGA® 250mg before the expiration of United States Patent No. 8,822,438 (the ’438 patent). The generic companies include Amneal Pharmaceuticals, LLC and Amneal Pharmaceuticals of New York, LLC (collectively, Amneal); Apotex Inc. (Apotex), Pharmascience Inc. (Pharmascience) and Apotex Corp. (collectively, Apotex); Citron Pharma LLC (Citron); Dr. Reddy’s Laboratories Ltd. and Dr. Reddy’s Laboratories, Inc. (collectively, Dr. Reddy’s); Mylan Pharmaceuticals Inc. and Mylan Inc. (collectively, Mylan); Par Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and Par Pharmaceutical Companies, Inc. (collectively, Par); Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc. (Teva); Wockhardt Bio A.G.; Wockhardt USA LLC and Wockhardt Ltd. (collectively, Wockhardt); West-Ward Pharmaceutical Corp. (West-Ward) and Hikma Pharmaceuticals, LLC (Hikma).

Janssen and BTG also initiated patent infringement lawsuitsDRL) in the United States District Court for the Districtresponse to those parties’ filing of Abbreviated New Jersey against Amerigen Pharmaceuticals Limited (Amerigen) in May 2016, and Glenmark Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (Glenmark) in June 2016, each of whom filed an ANDADrug Submissions (ANDS) seeking approval to market its generic versionversions of ZYTIGA® before the expiration of the ’438 patent. These lawsuits were consolidated withCanadian Patent No. 2,661,422 (’422). The trial in these actions concluded in November 2020, and the main action.Court issued a decision holding the ’422 patent invalid in January 2021. In February 2021, Janssen appealed the decision.

In August 2015, Janssen and BTG filed an additional jurisdictional protective lawsuit against the Mylan defendants in the United States District Court for the Northern District of West Virginia, which has been stayed.XARELTO®

In August 2017,March 2021, Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (JPI) and BTG initiatedBayer Pharma AG and Bayer AG (collectively, Bayer) filed a patent infringement lawsuit in the United States District Court for the District of New JerseyDelaware against Teva, whoLupin Limited and Lupin Pharmaceuticals, Inc. which filed an ANDA seeking approval to market a generic version of ZYTIGAXARELTO® 500mg before the expiration of the ’438 patent. This lawsuit has been consolidated with the main action.U.S. Patent No. 10,828,310 (’310).

In December 2017, Janssen and BTG entered into a settlement agreement with Glenmark.

In February 2018, JanssenMay 2021, JPI and BTGBayer filed a patent infringement lawsuit against MSN Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and MSN Laboratories Private Limited (collectively, MSN) in United States District Court for the District of New Jersey based on its ANDA seeking approval for a generic version of ZYTIGA® prior to the expiration of the ’438 patent. In February 2019, the action was stayed pending the outcome of the main action.

In April 2018, Janssen and BTG entered into a settlement agreement with Apotex.


90



In October 2018, the United States District Court for the District of New Jersey issued a ruling invalidating all asserted claims of the ’438 patent. The court held that the patent claims would be infringed if the patent were valid. Janssen appealed the court’s decision.

In November 2018, Janssen and BTG initiated a patent infringement lawsuit in the United States District Court for the District of New JerseyDelaware against Qilu Pharmaceutical Co.,Dr. Reddy’s Laboratories, Inc. and Dr. Reddy’s Laboratories, Ltd. and Qilu Pharma, Inc. (collectively, Qilu), whowhich filed an ANDA seeking approval to market a generic version of ZYTIGAXARELTO® before the expiration of the ’438 patent. Janssen is seeking an order enjoining Qilu from marketing its generic version of ZYTIGA® before the expiration of the ’438’310 patent.

In November 2018, the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit denied Janssen’s request for an injunction pending appeal. As a result, several generic versions of ZYTIGA® have entered the market.

Several generic companies including Amerigen, Argentum Pharmaceuticals LLC (Argentum), Mylan, Wockhardt, Actavis, Amneal, Dr. Reddy’s, Sun, Teva, West-Ward and Hikma filed Petitions for Inter Partes Review (IPR) with the USPTO, seeking to invalidate the ’438 patent. In January 2018, the USPTO issued decisions finding the ’438 patent claims unpatentable, and Janssen requested rehearing. In December 2018, the USPTO denied Janssen’s request for rehearing of the IPR decisions. Janssen filed an appeal, which was consolidated with the above-mentioned appeal of the decision of the United States District Court for the District of New Jersey. In May 2019, the Federal Circuit issued a decision affirming the USPTO's decision in the Wockhardt IPR that the ’438 patent claims are unpatentable and dismissed the remaining appeals as moot. Subsequently, Janssen dismissed its lawsuits against MSN and Qilu.

In November 2017, Janssen initiated a Notice of Application under Section 6 of the Patented Medicines (Notice of Compliance) Regulations against Apotex Inc. (Apotex) and the Minister of Health in Canada in response to Apotex’s filing of an Abbreviated New Drug Submission (ANDS) seeking approval to market a generic version of ZYTIGA® before the expiration of Canadian Patent No. 2,661,422 (the ’422 patent). The final hearing concluded in May 2019. In October 2019, the court issued an order prohibiting the Canadian Minister of Health from approving Apotex’s ANDS until the expiration of the ’422 patent. In November 2019, Apotex filed an appeal.

In January 2019, Janssen initiated a Notice of Application under Section 6 of the Patented Medicines (Notice of Compliance) Regulations against Apotex and the Minister of Health in Canada in response to Apotex’s filing of an Abbreviated New Drug Submission (ANDS) seeking approval to market a film-coated generic version of ZYTIGA® before the expiration of the ’422 patent.

In January 2019, Janssen initiated a Notice of Application under Section 6 of the Patented Medicines (Notice of Compliance) Regulations against Pharmascience Inc. (Pharmascience) and the Minister of Health in Canada in response to Pharmascience’s filing of an Abbreviated New Drug Submission (ANDS) seeking approval to market a generic version of ZYTIGA® 250 mg,before the expiration of the ’422 patent. The final hearing is scheduled to begin in October 2020.

In November 2019, Janssen initiated a Notice of Application under Section 6 of the Patented Medicines (Notice of Compliance) Regulations against Pharmascience and the Minister of Health in Canada in response to Pharmascience’s filing of an ANDS seeking approval to market a generic version of ZYTIGA®, 500 mg, before the expiration of the ’422 patent. The final hearing is scheduled to begin in October 2020.

In January 2019, Janssen initiated a Notice of Application under Section 6 of the Patented Medicines (Notice of Compliance) Regulations against Sandoz Canada Inc. (Sandoz) and the Minister of Health in Canada in response to Sandoz’s filing of an Abbreviated New Drug Submission (ANDS) seeking approval to market a generic version of ZYTIGA® before the expiration of Canadian Patent No. 2,661,422. In July 2019, the parties entered into a settlement agreement.

In June 2019, Janssen initiated a Notice of Application under Section 6 of the Patented Medicines (Notice of Compliance) Regulations against Dr. Reddy's Laboratories Ltd. and Dr. Reddy's Laboratories, Inc. (collectively, DRL) and the Minister of Health in Canada in response to Apotex’s filing of an Abbreviated New Drug Submission (ANDS) seeking approval to market a generic version of ZYTIGA® before the expiration of Canadian Patent No. 2,661,422. The final hearing is scheduled to begin in October 2020.

In each of these Canadian actions, Janssen is seeking an order prohibiting the Minister of Health from issuing a Notice of Compliance with respect to the defendants’ ANDSs before the expiration of Janssen’s patent.


9192



XARELTO®
Beginning in October 2015, Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (JPI)In July 2021, JPI and Bayer Pharma AG and Bayer Intellectual Property GmbH (collectively, Bayer) filed a patent infringement lawsuitslawsuit in the United States District Court for the District of Delaware against a number of generic companies who filed ANDAs seeking approval to market generic versions of XARELTO® before expiration of Bayer’s United States Patent Nos. 7,157,456, 7,585,860 and 7,592,339 relating to XARELTO®. JPI is the exclusive sublicensee of the asserted patents. The following generic companies are named defendants: Aurobindo Pharma Limited and Aurobindo Pharma USA, Inc. (collectively, Aurobindo); Breckenridge Pharmaceutical, Inc. (Breckenridge); InvaGen Pharmaceuticals Inc. (InvaGen); Micro Labs USA Inc. and Micro Labs Ltd (collectively, Micro); Mylan Pharmaceuticals Inc. (Mylan); Prinston Pharmaceuticals, Inc.; Sigmapharm Laboratories, LLC (Sigmapharm); Torrent Pharmaceuticals, Limited and Torrent Pharma Inc. (collectively, Torrent). The trial concluded in April 2018. In July 2018 the district court entered judgment against Mylan and Sigmapharm, holding that the asserted compound patent is valid and infringed. In September 2018, the district court entered judgment against the remaining defendants. None of the defendants appealed the judgment.
Beginning in April 2017, JPI and Bayer Intellectual Property GmbH and Bayer AG (collectively, Bayer AG) filed patent infringement lawsuits in the United States District Court for the District of Delaware against a number of generic companies who filed ANDAs seeking approval to market generic versions of XARELTO® before expiration of Bayer AG’s United States Patent No. 9,539,218 (’218) relating to XARELTO®. JPI is the exclusive sublicensee of the asserted patent. The following generic companies are named defendants: Alembic Pharmaceuticals Limited, Alembic Global Holding SA and Alembic Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (Alembic); Aurobindo; Breckenridge; InvaGen; Lupin Limited and Lupin Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (collectively, Lupin); Micro; Mylan; Sigmapharm; Taro Pharmaceutical Industries Ltd. and Taro Pharmaceuticals U.S.A., Inc. (collectively, Taro) and Torrent. Lupin counterclaimed for declaratory judgmentwhich filed an ANDA seeking approval to market a generic version of noninfringement and invalidity of United States Patent No. 9,415,053, but Lupin dismissed its counterclaims after it was provided a covenant not to sue on that patent. Aurobindo, Taro, Torrent, Micro, Breckenridge, InvaGen, Sigmapharm, Lupin and Alembic have agreed to have their cases stayed and to be bound by the outcome of any final judgment rendered against anyXARELTO® before expiration of the other defendants. The ’218 cases have been consolidated for discovery and trial. The trial began in April 2019 and closing arguments were heard in June 2019.’310 patent.

In December 2018,July 2021, JPI and Bayer AG filed a patent infringement lawsuit in the United States District Court for the District of Delaware against Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc. and Teva Pharmaceutical Industries Ltd. (collectively, Teva) whowhich filed an ANDA seeking approval to market a generic version of XARELTO® before expiration of Bayer AG’s ’218the ’310 patent. The case againstIn August 2021, the court entered a joint stipulation dismissing Teva has beenPharmaceutical Industries Ltd.

In October 2021, the court consolidated with the other ’218 casesDelaware lawsuits for all purposes, and Teva has agreedincluding trial. Trial for the consolidated Delaware lawsuits is scheduled to have its case stayed and to be bound by the outcome of any final judgment rendered against any of the other defendants.begin in May 2023.


In May 2018, Mylan filed a Petition for Inter Partes Review with the USPTO, seeking to invalidate the ’218 patent. In December 2018, the USPTO issued a decision denying institution of Mylan’s Petition for Inter Partes Review.

In May 2019,July 2021, JPI and Bayer filed suit against Macleods Pharmaceuticals Ltd. and Macleods Pharma USA, Inc. (collectively, Macleods) alleging infringement of the ’218 patent. The case against Macleods has been consolidated with the other ’218 cases for all purposes, and Macleods has agreed to have its case stayed and to be bound by the outcome of any final judgment rendered against any of the other defendants.

In June 2019, JPI and Bayer filed suit against Accord Healthcare Inc., Accord Healthcare Ltd., and Intas Pharmaceuticals Ltd. (collectively, Accord) alleging infringement of the ’218 patent.

In August 2019, JPI and Bayer filed suit against Sunshine Lake Pharma Co., Ltd. and HEC Pharm USA Inc. alleging infringement of the ’218 patent.

In October 2019, JPI and Bayer entered into a settlement agreement with Mylan. In November 2019, JPI and Bayer entered into a settlement agreement with Breckenridge. In December 2019, JPI and Bayer entered into settlement agreements with each of Accord, Micro, Sigmapharm, Sunshine, and Torrent. In January 2020, JPI and Bayer entered into a settlement agreement with Macleods.

The consolidated ’218 cases involving Alembic, Aurobindo, InvaGen, Lupin, Taro, and Teva, and have been stayed until March 2020.

In each of these lawsuits, JPI is seeking an order enjoining the defendants from marketing their generic versions of XARELTO® before the expiration of the relevant patents.

PREZISTA®

92




In May 2018, Janssen Products, L.P. and Janssen Sciences Ireland UC (collectively, Janssen) initiated a patent infringement lawsuit in the United States District Court for the Northern District of New JerseyWest Virginia against Dr. Reddys Laboratories, Inc., Dr. Reddys Laboratories, Ltd., Laurus Labs, Ltd. and Pharmaq, Inc. (collectively, DRL) who filed an ANDA seeking approval to market generic versions of PREZISTA® before the expiration of United States Patent Nos. 8,518,987; 7,126,015; and 7,595,408. In February 2019, the parties entered into a settlement agreement.

In December 2018, Janssen initiated a patent infringement lawsuit in the United States District Court for the District of New Jersey against AmnealMylan Pharmaceuticals LLC, Amneal Pharmaceuticals Company GmbH, Amneal Pharmaceuticals of New York, LLC, Amneal Pharmaceuticals Pvt Ltd., and Raks Pharma Pvt. Ltd. (collectively, Amneal), who filed an ANDA seeking approval to market generic versions of PREZISTA® before the expiration of United States Patent Nos. 8,518,987; 7,126,015; and 7,595,408. In April 2019, the parties entered into a settlement agreement.

In January 2020, Janssen Products, L.P. and Janssen Sciences Ireland Unlimited Company (collectively, Janssen) initiated a patent infringement lawsuit in the United States District Court for the District of New Jersey against Zydus Pharmaceuticals (USA), Inc. and Cadila Healthcare Ltd. (collectively, Zydus), whoMylan Inc. which filed an ANDA seeking approval to market a generic version of PREZISTAXARELTO® before the expiration of the ’310 patent. In August 2021, JPI and Bayer filed a motion before the United States Patent Nos. 7,700,645, 8,518,987, 7,126,015Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation (the MDL panel) to transfer this lawsuit to the United States District Court for the District of Delaware for coordinated and 7,595,408. Janssen isconsolidated pretrial proceedings. In December 2021, the MDL panel granted the motion. No trial date has been set in this lawsuit.

In each of these lawsuits, JPI and Bayer are seeking an order enjoining Zydusdefendants from marketing itstheir generic version of PREZISTAXARELTO® before the expiration of the relevant patents.’310 patent.

INVOKANA®/INVOKAMET®/INVOKAMET XR®

Beginning in July 2017,In October 2019, Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Janssen Research & Development, LLC, Cilag GmbH International and Janssen Pharmaceutica NV (collectively, Janssen) and Mitsubishi Tanabe Pharma Corporation (MTPC) filedinitiated a patent infringement lawsuitslawsuit in the United States District Court for the District of New Jersey the United States District Court for the District of Colorado and the United States District Court for the District of Delaware against a number of generic companies who filed ANDAs seeking approval to market generic versions of INVOKANA® and/or INVOKAMET® before expiration of MTPC’s United States Patent Nos. 7,943,582 (the ’582 patent) and/or 8,513,202 (the ’202 patent) relating to INVOKANA® and INVOKAMET®. Janssen is the exclusive licensee of the asserted patents. The following generic companies are named defendants:  Apotex Inc. and Apotex Corp. (Apotex); Aurobindo Pharma USA Inc. (Aurobindo); Macleods Pharmaceuticals Ltd. and Macleods Pharma USA, Inc.; InvaGen Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (InvaGen); Prinston Pharmaceuticals Inc.; Dr. Reddy’s Laboratories, Inc. and Dr. Reddy’s Laboratories Ltd; Hetero USA, Inc.Ltd (DRL), Hetero Labs Limited Unit-V and Hetero Labs Limited; MSN Laboratories Private Ltd. and MSN Pharmaceuticals, Inc.; Laurus Labs Ltd.; Indoco Remedies Ltd.; Zydus Pharmaceuticals (USA) Inc. (Zydus); Sandoz, Inc. (Sandoz); Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc.; and Lupin Ltd. and Lupin Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (Lupin).

Beginning in July 2017, Janssen and MTPC filed patent infringement lawsuits in the United States District Court for the District of New Jersey and the United States District Court for the District of Colorado against Sandoz and InvaGen, who filed ANDAs seeking approval to market generic versions of INVOKANA® and/or INVOKAMET® before expiration of MTPC’s United States Patent No. 7,943,788 (the ’788 patent) relating to INVOKANA® and INVOKAMET® and against Zydus, who filed ANDAs seeking approval to market generic versions of INVOKANA® and INVOKAMET® before expiration of the ’788 patent, MTPC's United States Patent No. 8,222,219 relating to INVOKANA® and INVOKAMET® and MTPC’s United States Patent No. 8,785,403 relating to INVOKAMET® (the ’403 patent), and against Aurobindo, who filed an ANDA seeking approval to market a generic version of INVOKANAINVOKAMET® before expiration of the ’788 patent and the ’219 patentMTPC’s United States Patent No. 7,943,788 (’788) relating to INVOKANAINVOKAMET®. Janssen is the exclusive licensee of the asserted patents. In October 2017, the Colorado lawsuits against Sandoz were dismissed. In December 2017, the Delaware lawsuits against Apotex and Teva were dismissed.

In April 2018,January 2021, Janssen and MTPC filed a patent infringement lawsuit in the United States District Court for the District of New Jersey against Prinston, who filed an ANDA seeking approval to market a generic version of INVOKANA® before expiration of the ’788 patent relating to INVOKANA®.

In February 2019, JanssenMacleods Pharmaceuticals, Ltd. and MTPC filed a patent infringement lawsuit in the United States District Court for the District of New Jersey against Lupin, whoMacleods Pharma USA, Inc. (Macleods), which filed an ANDA seeking approval to market a generic version of INVOKAMET XR® before expiration of the ’582 patent and ’202 patentMTPC’s United States Patent Nos. 7,943,582 (’582) and/or 8,513,202 (’202) relating to INVOKAMET XR®.

In July 2019,each of these U.S. lawsuits, Janssen and MTPC filedare seeking an order enjoining the defendant from marketing their generic versions of INVOKAMET® and/or, INVOKAMET XR® before the expiration of the relevant patents.

In October 2020, Janssen Inc., Janssen Pharmaceutica NV and MTPC initiated a patent infringement lawsuitStatement of Claim under Section 6 of the Patented Medicines (Notice of Compliance) Regulations against Sandoz Canada Inc. (Sandoz) in the United States District Court for the DistrictCanada in response to Sandoz’s filing of New Jersey against MSN, who filed an ANDAANDS seeking approval to market a generic version of INVOKAMET XRINVOKANA® before the expiration of the ’582 patentCanadian Patent Nos. 2,799,204, 2,534,024 and ’202 patent relating to INVOKAMET XR®.

93




In October 2019,2,671,357. Janssen Inc., Janssen Pharmaceutica NV and MTPC initiated a patent infringement lawsuit in the United States District Court for the District of New Jersey against MSN, who filed ANDAsare seeking approval to marketan order enjoining Sandoz from marketing its generic versionsversion of INVOKANA® and INVOKAMET XR® before the expiration of the ’788 patent. relevant patents. The trial is scheduled to begin in August 2022.

OPSUMIT®

In October 2019,May 2020, Janssen Inc. (Janssen) and MTPCActelion Pharmaceuticals Ltd (Actelion) initiated a patent infringement lawsuitStatement of Claim under Section 6 of the Patented Medicines (Notice of Compliance) Regulations against Sandoz Canada Inc. (Sandoz) in the United States District Court for the DistrictCanada in response to Sandoz’s filing of New Jersey against DRL, who filed an ANDAANDS seeking approval to market a generic version of INVOKAMETOPSUMIT®10 mg, before the expiration of Canadian Patent No. 2,659,770 (’770). Trial is ongoing.

In May 2020, Janssen and Actelion initiated a Statement of Claim under Section 6 of the Patented Medicines (Notice of Compliance) Regulations against Apotex Inc. (Apotex) in Canada in response to Apotex’s filing of an ANDS seeking approval to market a generic version of OPSUMIT® 10 mg,before the expiration of the ’788’770 patent. Trial is scheduled to begin in February 2022.

In July 2020, Janssen and MTPC entered into settlement agreements with PrinstonActelion initiated a Statement of Claim under Section 6 of the Patented Medicines (Notice of Compliance) Regulations against JAMP Pharma Corporation (JAMP) in Canada in response to JAMP’s filing of an ANDS seeking approval to market a generic version of OPSUMIT® 10 mg before the expiration of the ’770 patent and InvaGen (June 2019), Hetero (July 2019) and Apotex and Teva (August 2019)Canadian Patent No. 2,621,273 (’273).

A trial on the ’582 and ’202 patents Trial is scheduled to begin in April 2020, and a trial on the ’788, ’219 and ’403 patents is scheduled to begin in May 2020.2022.

93


In each of these lawsuits,Canadian actions, Janssen and MTPCActelion are seeking an order enjoining the defendants from marketing their generic versions of INVOKANAOPSUMIT®, INVOKAMET® and/or, INVOKAMET XR® before the expiration of the relevant patents.

OPSUMIT®

In January 2018, Actelion Pharmaceuticals Ltd (Actelion) initiated a patent infringement lawsuit in the United States District Court for the District of New Jersey against Zydus Pharmaceuticals (USA) Inc. (Zydus) and Amneal Pharmaceuticals LLC (Amneal), each of whom filed an ANDA seeking approval to market a generic version of OPSUMIT® before the expiration of United States Patent No. 7,094,781 (the ’781 patent). In the lawsuit, Actelion is seeking an order enjoining Zydus and Amneal from marketing generic versions of OPSUMIT® before the expiration of the patent. Amneal and Zydus have stipulated to infringement. In February 2019, Actelion and Amneal entered into a settlement agreement. The trial against Zydus is scheduled to commence in October 2020.

In July 2019, Actelion Pharmaceuticals Ltd. filed suit against Aurobindo Pharma USA Inc. and Aurobindo Pharma Limited (Aurobindo). Aurobindo filed an ANDA seeking approval to market a generic version of OPSUMIT® before the expiration of the ’781 patent. Actelion is seeking an order enjoining Defendants from marketing a generic version of OPSUMIT® before the expiration of the ’781 patent. Trial against Aurobindo is scheduled to commence in July 2021.

INVEGA SUSTENNA®

In January 2018, Janssen Pharmaceutica NV and Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (collectively, Janssen) initiated a patent infringement lawsuit in the United States District Court for the District of New Jersey against Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc. (Teva), whowhich filed an ANDA seeking approval to market a generic version of INVEGA SUSTENNA® before the expiration of United States Patent No. 9,439,906.9,439,906 (’906). Trial concluded in October 2020. In October 2021, the court issued a decision in Janssen’s favor. Teva has appealed the decision.

In August 2019, Janssen initiated a patent infringement lawsuit in the United States District Court for the District of New Jersey against Mylan Laboratories Limited (Mylan), which filed an ANDA seeking approval to market a generic version of INVEGA SUSTENNA® before the expiration of the ’906 patent. Pursuant to an agreement by the parties, judgment in favor of Janssen was entered in December 2021. Mylan has filed an appeal.

In December 2019, Janssen initiated a patent infringement lawsuit in the United States District Courts for the Districts of New Jersey and Delaware against Pharmascience Inc., Mallinckrodt PLC and Specgx LLC (collectively, Pharmascience), which filed an ANDA seeking approval to market a generic version of INVEGA SUSTENNA® before the expiration of the ’906 patent.

In November 2021, Janssen initiated a patent infringement lawsuit in the United States District Court for the District of Delaware against Tolmar, Inc., Tolmar Therapeutics, Inc., Tolmar Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and Tolmar Holding, Inc. (collectively, Tolmar), which filed an ANDA seeking approval to market a generic version of INVEGA SUSTENNA® before the expiration of the ’906 patent.

In each of these U.S. lawsuits, Janssen is seeking an order enjoining the defendant from marketing a generic version of INVEGA SUSTENNA® before the expiration of the relevant patents.

In February 2018, Janssen Inc. and Janssen Pharmaceutica NV (collectively, Janssen Canada) initiated a Statement of Claim under Section 6 of the Patented Medicines (Notice of Compliance) Regulations against Teva Canada Limited (Teva Canada) in response to Teva’s filing of an ANDS seeking approval to market a generic version of INVEGA SUSTENNA® before the expiration of Canadian Patent Nos. 2,309,629 (’629) and 2,655,335 (’335). Janssen subsequently discontinued the portion of the lawsuit relating to the ’629 patent. In May 2020, the Canadian Federal Court issued a Public Judgment and Reasons declaring that Teva Canada’s generic version of INVEGA SUSTENNA®, if approved, would infringe certain claims of the ’335 patent and that the claims of the ’335 patent are not invalid for obviousness. Teva Canada appealed.

In November 2020, Janssen Canada initiated a Statement of Claim under Section 6 of the Patented Medicines (Notice of Compliance) Regulations against Pharmascience Inc. in response to Pharmascience Inc.’s filing of an ANDS seeking approval to market a generic version of INVEGA SUSTENNA® before the expiration of the ’335 patent. A summary trial on the issue of infringement took place in November 2021. In January 2022, the Court issued a decision in favor of Janssen on the issue of infringement. A trial on the issue of validity is scheduled to begin in June 2020.July 2022.

In August 2019,January 2021, Janssen Canada initiated a Statement of Claim under Section 6 of the Patented Medicines (Notice of Compliance) Regulations against Apotex Inc. (Apotex) in response to Apotex’s filing of an ANDS seeking approval to market a generic version of INVEGA SUSTENNA® before the expiration of the ’335 patent. A summary trial on the issue of infringement took place in December 2021. In January 2022, the Court issued a decision in favor of Janssen on the issue of infringement. Apotex has not contested validity.

In each of these Canadian lawsuits, Janssen Canada is seeking an order enjoining the defendant from marketing a generic version of INVEGA SUSTENNA® before the expiration of the relevant patents.

INVEGA TRINZA®

In September 2020, Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Janssen Pharmaceutica NV, and Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Research & Development, LLC (collectively, Janssen) initiated a patent infringement lawsuit in the United States District Court for the District of New Jersey against Mylan Laboratories Limited, (Mylan)Mylan Pharmaceuticals Inc., whoand Mylan Institutional LLC (collectively, Mylan). Mylan filed an ANDA seeking approval to market a generic versionversions of INVEGA SUSTENNATRINZA® (546 mg) before the expiration of the patent.

In December 2019, Janssen Pharmaceutica NV and Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (collectively, Janssen) initiated a patent infringement lawsuit in the United States District Courts for the Districts of New Jersey and Delaware against Pharmascience Inc., Mallincrodt PLC and Specgx LLC (collectively, Pharmascience), who filed an ANDA seeking approval to market a generic version of INVEGA SUSTENNA® before the expiration of United States Patent No. 9,439,906.

In February 2018, Janssen Inc. and Janssen Pharmaceutica NV (collectively, Janssen) initiated a Notices of Application under Section 6 of the Patented Medicines (Notice of Compliance) Regulations against Teva Canada Limited (Teva) and the Minister of Health in response10,143,693 (’693) relating to Teva's filing of an Abbreviated New Drug Submission (ANDS) seeking approval to market a generic version of INVEGA SUSTENNATRINZA® before the expiration of Canadian Patent Nos. 2,309,629 and 2,655,335. Janssen is seeking an order prohibiting the Minister of Health from issuing a Notice of Compliance with respect to Teva’s ANDS before the expiration of these patents. The final hearing is scheduled to begin in February 2020.

In each of these lawsuits,(546 mg). Janssen is seeking an order enjoining the defendantMylan from marketing a generic version of INVEGA SUSTENNATRINZA® before the expiration of the ’693 patent.

IMBRUVICA®

94




Beginning in January 2018, Pharmacyclics LLC (Pharmacyclics) and Janssen Biotech, Inc. (JBI) filed patent infringement lawsuits in the United States District Court for the District of Delaware against a number of generic companies who filed ANDAs seeking approval to market generic versions of IMBRUVICA® 140 mg capsulesbefore expiration of Pharmacyclics’  United States Patent Nos. 8,008,309, 7,514,444, 8,697,711, 8,735,403, 8,957,079, 9,181,257, 8,754,091, 8,497,277, 8,925,015, 8,476,284, 8,754,090, 8,999,999, 9,125,889, 9,801,881, 9,801,883, 9,814,721, 9,795,604, 9,296,753, 9,540,382, 9,713,617 and/or 9,725,455 relating to IMBRUVICA®. JBI is the exclusive licensee of the asserted patents. The following generic companies are named defendants: Cipla Limited and Cipla USA Inc. (Cipla); Fresenius Kabi USA, LLC, Fresenius Kabi USA, Inc., and Fresenius Kabi Oncology Limited (Fresenius Kabi); Sandoz Inc. and Lek Pharmaceuticals d.d. (Sandoz); Shilpa Medicare Limited (Shilpa); Sun Pharma Global FZE and Sun Pharmaceutical Industries Limited (Sun); Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc. (Teva); and Zydus Worldwide DMCC and Cadila Healthcare Limited (Zydus). The trial Trial is scheduled to begin in October 2020.2022.

94


In October 2018, Pharmacyclics and JBI filedAugust 2021, Janssen initiated a patent infringement lawsuit in the United States District Court for the District of DelawareNew Jersey against Sun asserting United States Patent No. 10,004,746.Mylan. Mylan filed an ANDA seeking approval to market generic versions of INVEGA TRINZA® (819 mg) before expiration of the ’693 patent. Janssen is seeking an order enjoining Mylan from marketing a generic version of INVEGA TRINZA® (819 mg) before the expiration of the ’693 patent.

In November 2018, Pharmacyclics and JBI filedOctober 2021, Janssen initiated a patent infringement lawsuit in the United States District Court for the District of DelawareNew Jersey against Hetero Labs Limited, Hetero Labs Limited Unit-1, Hetero Labs Limited Unit-V, and Hetero USA Inc. (Hetero), whoMylan. Mylan filed an ANDA seeking approval to market generic versions of INVEGA TRINZA® (273 mg and 410 mg) before expiration of the ’693 patent. Janssen is seeking an order enjoining Mylan from marketing a generic version of IMBRUVICAINVEGA TRINZA®140 mg capsules, asserting infringement of United States Patent Nos. 8,754,090, 9,296,753, 9,540,382, 9,713,617 and 9,725,455.

In January 2019, Pharmacyclics and JBI amended their complaints against Fresenius Kabi, Zydus, Teva and Sandoz to further allege infringement of U.S. Patent Nos. 10,106,548, and 10,125,140.

In January 2019, Pharmacyclics and JBI filed a patent infringement lawsuit in the United States District Court for the District of Delaware against Zydus, who filed an ANDA seeking approval to market a generic version of IMBRUVICA® 70(273 mg and 410 mg) before the expiration of U.S. Patent Nos. 7,514,444, 8,003,309, 8,476,284, 8,497,277, 8,697,711, 8,753,403, 8,754,090, 8,754,091, 8,952,015, 8,957,079, 9,181,257, 9,296,753, 9,540,382, 9,713,617, 9,725,455, 10,106,548, and 10,125,140.the ’693 patent.

In January 2019, Pharmacyclics and JBI2022, the court consolidated the three cases into the case filed a patent infringement lawsuit in the United States District Court for the District of Delaware against Hetero asserting infringement of United States Patent No. 10,106,548.September 2020.

In February 2019, Pharmacyclics and JBI amended their complaints against Cipla, Shilpa, and Sun to allege infringement of United States Patent Nos. 10,106,548, and 10,125,140.IMBRUVICA®

In February 2019, Pharmacyclics and JBI entered into settlement agreements with Teva and Hetero. In March 2019, Pharmacyclics and JBI entered into a settlement agreement with Shilpa.

In March 2019, Pharmacyclics LLC (Pharmacyclics) and JBIJanssen Biotech, Inc. (JBI) filed a patent infringement lawsuit in the United States District Court for the District of Delaware against Alvogen Pine Brook LLC and Natco Pharma Ltd. (Alvogen)(collectively, Alvogen), whowhich filed an ANDA seeking approval to market generic versions of IMBRUVICA® tablets, asserting infringement of United States Patent Nos. 7,514,444, 8,003,309, 8,476,284, 8,497,277, 8,697,711, 8,753,403, 8,754,090, 8,754,091, 8,952,015, 8,957,079, 9,181,257, 9,296,753, 9,655,857, 9,725,455, 10,010,507, 10,106,548,7,514,444; 8,003,309; 8,476,284; 8,497,277; 8,697,711; 8,753,403; 8,754,090; 8,754,091; 8,952,015; 8,957,079; 9,181,257; 9,296,753; 9,655,857; 9,725,455; 10,010,507; 10,106,548; and 10,125,140.

In May 2019, Pharmacyclics and JBI amended their complaints against Cipla to further allege infringement of United States Patent No. 10,016,435. In June 2019, Pharmacyclics and JBI amended their complaintscomplaint against Alvogen to further allege infringement of United States Patent No. 10,213,386.

In August 2019, Pharmacyclics and JBI amended their complaints against Cipla, Fresenius, and Sandoz to further allege infringement of U.S. Patent Nos. 10,294,231 and 10,294,232 and amended their complaint against Sun to further allege infringement of U.S. Patent No. 10,294,232.

In March 2019, Sandoz filed an Inter Partes Review (IPR) in the USPTO, seeking to invalidate United States Patent No. 9,795,604.

In each of the lawsuits, Pharmacyclics and JBI are seeking an order enjoining the defendants from marketing generic versions of IMBRUVICA® before the expiration of the relevant patents.

Trial against Alvogen took place in October 2020. In August 2021, the District Court issued a decision in favor of Pharmacyclics and Janssen finding the asserted claims against Alvogen to be infringed and not invalid. Alvogen has appealed that decision.
TRACLEER
®


95



In May 2019, Actelion Pharmaceuticals LtdSeptember 2021, Pharmacyclics and Actelion Pharmaceuticals US,Janssen Inc. (Janssen Canada) initiated a patent infringement lawsuit inStatements of Claim under Section 6 of the United States District Court for the DistrictPatented Medicines (Notice of New JerseyCompliance) Regulations against Natco Pharma Limited and Syneos Health LLC (collectively, Natco), who filed an ANDA(Canada) Inc. (Natco) in response to Natco’s filing of two ANDSs seeking approval to market a generic versionversions of TRACLEERIMBRUVICA®, 32 mg,capsules before the expiration of U.S.Canadian Patent No. 8,309,126 (the ’126 patent). In the lawsuit, ActelionNos. 2,663,116; 2,928,721; 2,800,913; 3,007,787; 3,007,788; 2,875,986; and 3,022,256. The trial is scheduled to begin in July 2023. Pharmacyclics and Janssen are seeking an order enjoining Natco from marketing its generic versionversions of TRACLEERIMBRUVICA® before the expiration of the ’126 patent. In November 2019, the parties entered into a settlement agreement.relevant patents.

UPTRAVI®

In December 2019,April 2020, Actelion Pharmaceuticals Ltd (Actelion) and Actelion Pharmaceuticals US, Inc.Nippon Shinyaku Co., Ltd. (Nippon Shinyaku) initiated a patent infringement lawsuit in the United States District Court for the District of New Jersey against Zydus Pharmaceuticals (USA), Inc. and Cadila Healthcare LimitedZydus Worldwide DMCC (collectively, Zydus), who filed an ANDA seeking approval to market a generic version of TRACLEERUPTRAVI®, 32 mg, before the expiration of U.S.Nippon Shinyaku’s United States Patent No. 8,309,126 (the ’126 patent)Nos. 7,205,302 (’302); relating to UPTRAVI®. Actelion is seeking an order enjoining Zydus from marketing its generic version of TRACLEER® before the expirationexclusive licensee of the ’126’302 patent.

RISPERDAL CONSTA®

In July 2019, Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Alkermes Pharma Ireland LimitedJanuary 2022, Actelion, Nippon Shinyaku and Alkermes Controlled Therapeutics, Inc. initiated a patent infringement lawsuit in the United States District Court for the District of Delaware against Luye Pharma Group Ltd., Luye Pharma (USA), Ltd., Nanjing Luye Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd. and Shandong Luye Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd. (collectively, Luye), who filed an ANDA seeking approval to market a generic version of RISPERDAL CONSTA® before the expiration of United States Patent No. 6,667,061. In November 2019, the partiesZydus entered into a settlement.confidential settlement agreement and the lawsuit was dismissed.

In this lawsuit, Janssen is seeking an order enjoining Luye from marketing a generic version of RISPERDAL CONSTA® before the expiration of the patent.

GOVERNMENT PROCEEDINGS
Like other companies in the pharmaceutical, consumer health and medical devices industries, Johnson & Johnson and certain of its subsidiaries are subject to extensive regulation by national, state and local government agencies in the United States and other countries in which they operate. As a result, interaction withSuch regulation has been the basis of government agencies is ongoing.investigations and litigations. The most significant litigation brought by, and investigations conducted by, government agencies are listed below. It is possible that criminal charges and substantial fines and/or civil penalties or damages could result from government investigations or litigation.

Average Wholesale Price (AWP) Litigation
Johnson & Johnson and several of its pharmaceutical subsidiaries (the J&J AWP Defendants), along with numerous other pharmaceutical companies, were named as defendants in a series of lawsuits in state and federal courts involving allegations that the pricing and marketing of certain pharmaceutical products amounted to fraudulent and otherwise actionable conduct because, among other things, the companies allegedly reported an inflated Average Wholesale Price (AWP) for the drugs at issue. Payors alleged that they used those AWPs in calculating provider reimbursement levels. The plaintiffs in these cases included three classes of private persons or entities that paid for any portion of the purchase of the drugs at issue based on
95


AWP, and state government entities that made Medicaid payments for the drugs at issue based on AWP. Many of these cases, both federal actions and state actions removed to federal court, were consolidated for pre-trial purposes in a multi-district litigation in the United States District Court for the District of Massachusetts, where all claims against the J&J AWP Defendants were ultimately dismissed. The J&J AWP Defendants also prevailed in a case brought by the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania. Other AWP cases have been resolved through court order or settlement. The case brought by Illinois was settled after trial. In New Jersey, a putative class action based upon AWP allegations is pending against Centocor, Inc. and Ortho Biotech Inc. (both now Janssen Biotech, Inc.), Johnson & Johnson and ALZA Corporation. All other cases have been resolved.

Opioid Litigation
Beginning in 2014 and continuing to the present, Johnson & Johnson and Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (JPI), along with other pharmaceutical companies, have been named in more than 2,800approximately 3,400 lawsuits brought by certain state and local governments related to the marketing of opioids, including DURAGESIC®, NUCYNTA® and NUCYNTA® ER. The suits also raise allegations related to previously owned active pharmaceutical ingredient supplier subsidiaries, Tasmanian Alkaloids Pty, Ltd. and Noramco, Inc. (both subsidiaries were divested in 2016). The majority of the cases have been filed by state and local governments. Similar lawsuits have also been filed by private plaintiffs and organizations, including but not limited to the following groups of plaintiffs:following: individual plaintiffs on behalf of children suffering from Neonatal Abstinence Syndrome; hospitals; and health insurers/payors. To date, complaints against pharmaceutical companies,manufacturers, including Johnson & Johnson and JPI, have been filed by the state Attorneys General in Arkansas, Florida, Idaho, Illinois, Kentucky, Louisiana, Mississippi, Missouri, Nevada, New

96



Hampshire, New Jersey, New Mexico, New York, Ohio, Oklahoma, South Dakota, Texas, Washington and West Virginia. Complaints against the manufacturers also have been filed in state or federal court by city, county and local government agencies in the following states: Alabama, Arizona, Arkansas, California, Colorado, Connecticut, Delaware, Florida, Georgia, Hawaii, Idaho, Illinois, Indiana, Iowa, Kansas, Kentucky, Louisiana, Maine, Maryland, Massachusetts, Michigan, Minnesota, Mississippi, Missouri, Montana, Nebraska, Nevada, New Hampshire, New Jersey, New Mexico, New York, North Carolina;Carolina, North Dakota, Ohio, Oklahoma, Oregon, Pennsylvania, Rhode Island, South Carolina, South Dakota, Tennessee, Texas, Utah, Vermont, Virginia, Washington, West Virginia, Wisconsin, and Wisconsin.Wyoming. The Government of Puerto Rico filed suit in Superior Court of San Juan. There are more than 350over 380 cases pending in various state courts. There are over 2,500close to 3,000 federal cases coordinated in a federal Multi-District Litigation (MDL) pending in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Ohio (MDL No. 2804).Ohio. In addition, the Province of British Columbia filed suit against Johnson & Johnson and its Canadian affiliate Janssen Inc., and many other industry members, in Canada, and is seeking to have that action certified as an opt in class action on behalf of other provincial/territorial and the federal governments in Canada. Additional proposed class actions have been filed in Canada against Johnson & Johnson and Janssen Inc., and many other industry members, by and on behalf of people who used opioids (for personal injuries), municipalities and First Nations bands. In October 2019, an anti-trustantitrust complaint was filed by private plaintiffs in federal court in Tennessee and is pending transfer to the MDL. These actions allege a variety of claims related to opioid marketing practices, including false advertising, unfair competition, public nuisance, consumer fraud violations, deceptive acts and practices, false claims and unjust enrichment. The suits generally seek penalties and/or injunctive and monetary relief and, in some of the suits, the plaintiffs are seeking joint and several liability among the defendants. An adverse judgment in any of these lawsuits could result in the imposition of large monetary penalties and significant damages including, punitive damages, cost of abatement, substantial fines, equitable remedies and other sanctions.

TheIn 2019, the trial in the matter filed by the Oklahoma Attorney General resulted in a judgment against Johnson & Johnson and JPI in the amount of $572 million, subject to a final order to be issued by the court.  The court issued a final judgment reducing the amount to $465 million. Johnson & Johnson and JPI have appealed the judgment. The Company believes that it has strong grounds to overturn thisjudgment, and in November 2021, the Oklahoma Supreme Court reversed the trial court’s judgment. In October 2019 Johnson & Johnson and JPI announced a settlement of the first case set for trial in the MDL with two counties in Ohio.

Johnson & Johnson, JPI In April 2021, three California counties and other pharmaceutical companies have also received subpoenas or requests for information related to opioids marketing practices from the followingCity of Oakland commenced a trial in California state Attorneys General: Alaska, Indiana, Montana, New Hampshire, South Carolina, Tennessee, Texas and Washington. In September 2017,court against Johnson & Johnson and JPI, were contacted byand other affiliates, as well as three other pharmaceutical manufacturers. The trial concluded in October 2021, and in December 2021, the TexasCourt entered a final trial judgment in favor of Defendants on all claims. In February 2022, Plaintiffs' motion to set aside and Colorado Attorney General’s Offices on behalf of approximately 38 states regarding a multi-state Attorney General investigation. In October 2019,vacate the Company announced a proposed agreement in principle that would include the Company paying $4 billion as settlement of these lawsuits, subject to various conditions and an agreement being finalized. This agreement in principle is not an admission of liability or wrong-doing and would resolve opioid lawsuits filed and future claims by states, cities and counties. The Company cannot predict if or when the agreement will be finalized and individual cases are ongoing, including a trial in New York scheduled to commence in March 2020.judgment was denied.

In August 2019, Johnson & Johnson received a grand jury subpoena from the United States Attorney’s Office for the Eastern District of New York for documents related to the Company’s anti-diversion policies and procedures and distribution of its opioid medications, in what the Company understands to be part of a broader investigation into manufacturers’ and distributors’ monitoring programs and reporting under the Controlled Substances Act. In September 2019, Johnson & Johnson received subpoenas from the New York State Department of Financial Services (NYDFS) as part of an industry-wide inquiry into the effect of opioid prescriptions on New York health insurance premiums. In September 2020, the Company learned that NYDFS filed a statement of charges related to this investigation.

In June 2021, the Company and JPI announced a settlement agreement with the State of New York and its participating subdivisions, including Nassau County and Suffolk County, resolving their opioid-related claims against the Company on terms consistent with the Company’s previously announced agreement in principle to contribute up to $5 billion to all-in settlement of opioid-related claims by states, cities, counties, and tribal governments. The settlement provides New York and its participating subdivisions with up to $263 million to address opioid-related issues, reimburses attorney fees and costs, and removes the
96


Company and Janssen from a multi-defendant trial of opioid-related claims that commenced in Suffolk County in June 2021. In exchange, the Company and JPI receive releases from the claims asserted by New York and the participating parties, including NYDFS.
In October 2021, the Company and JPI announced a settlement agreement with the State of Texas and its participating subdivisions, including Dallas County, Bexar County, and Tarrant County, resolving their opioid-related claims against the Company on terms consistent with the Company’s previously announced agreement to contribute up to $5 billion to all-in settlement of opioid-related claims by states, cities, counties, and tribal governments. The settlement provides Texas and its participating subdivisions with up to $297 million to address opioid-related issues and reimburse attorney fees and costs, and removes the Company and Janssen from multi-defendant bellwether trials of opioid-related claims scheduled to commence in Texas state courts in early 2022. In exchange, the Company and JPI will receive releases from the claims asserted by Texas and the participating subdivisions.

Johnson & Johnson, JPI and other pharmaceutical companies have also received subpoenas or requests for information related to opioids marketing practices from the following state Attorneys General: Alaska, Indiana, Montana, New Hampshire, South Carolina, Tennessee, Texas and Washington. In September 2017, Johnson & Johnson and JPI were contacted by the Texas and Colorado Attorney General’s Offices on behalf of approximately 38 states regarding a multi-state Attorney General investigation. In October 2019, the Company announced a proposed agreement in principle that would include the Company paying $4 billion as settlement of these matters. In October 2020, the Company agreed to contribute up to an additional $1 billion to an all-in settlement amount that would resolve opioid lawsuits filed and future claims by states, cities, counties and tribal governments, for a total of $5 billion which has been accrued, subject to various conditions and an agreement being finalized. This agreement in principle is not an admission of liability or wrong-doing. In July 2021, the Company announced that the terms of the agreement to settle the state and subdivision claims have been finalized and up to one-third of the all-in settlement is expected to be paid within the next 12 months, depending upon the level of participation by the states and their subdivisions. The terms provide a period of time for states to elect to participate in the agreement and, thereafter, a period for the subdivisions of the participating states to opt-in. As of January 2022, 45 states, five territories, and the District of Columbia had elected to participate in the settlement. The subdivision opt-in period expired in January 2022. The Company retains the right to opt-out of the agreement until late February 2022 if, in its sole discretion, there is cooperatinginsufficient participation. Based on expected participation, the Company has committed in advance to proceed with the settlement in five of the participating states (New York, Texas, Florida, Nevada, and producing documentsNew Mexico) and with tribal governments, whose cases were scheduled for trial in response2021, 2022, or 2023.

From June 2017 through December 2019, the Company’s Board of Directors received a series of shareholder demand letters alleging breaches of fiduciary duties related to the various subpoenasmarketing of opioids. The Board retained independent counsel to investigate the allegations in the demands, and requestsin April 2020, independent counsel delivered a report to the Board recommending that the Company reject the shareholder demands and take the steps that are necessary or appropriate to secure dismissal of related derivative litigation. The Board unanimously adopted the recommendations of the independent counsel’s report.

In November 2019, one of the shareholders who sent a demand filed a derivative complaint against Johnson & Johnson as the nominal defendant and certain current and former directors and officers as defendants in the Superior Court of New Jersey. The complaint alleges breaches of fiduciary duties related to the marketing of opioids, and that Johnson & Johnson has suffered damages as a result of those alleged breaches. In May 2020, the shareholder filed an amended complaint challenging the Board’s rejection of his demand. In August 2020, Johnson & Johnson moved to dismiss the amended complaint. In February 2021, the Court held oral argument on Johnson & Johnson’s motion. In February 2022, the Court granted Johnson & Johnson’s motion to dismiss the amended complaint. In August 2020, another shareholder who sent a demand filed a separate derivative complaint in the same court making similar allegations. In October 2020, the Court granted defendants’ request to reassign the second-filed case to the division where the first-filed case is pending.

In December 2019, two additional shareholders who sent demands filed two separate derivative complaints making similar allegations against Johnson & Johnson as the nominal defendant and certain current and former directors and officers as defendants in the United States District for information.the District of New Jersey. In April 2020, the two federal cases were consolidated into a single action captioned In re Johnson & Johnson Opioid Stockholder Derivative Litigation. In July 2020, the shareholders filed a consolidated complaint. In September 2020, Johnson & Johnson moved to dismiss the consolidated complaint, and in December 2020, the shareholders opposed Johnson & Johnson’s motion. Johnson & Johnson filed its reply in February 2021. In July 2020, an additional shareholder who sent a demand filed a derivative complaint in the same federal court making similar allegations against the same defendants named in the consolidated action. In January 2021, pursuant to an order in the consolidated action, the third case was consolidated into the consolidated action. In February 2021, the Court granted the shareholders motion to voluntarily dismiss the consolidated action without prejudice, and the shareholders’ counsel then filed a notice of association in the first-filed derivative action pending in the Superior Court of New Jersey.



97


Other
In August 2012, DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc., DePuy, Inc. (now known as DePuy Synthes, Inc.), and Johnson & Johnson Services, Inc. (collectively DePuy) received an informal request from the United States Attorney'sAttorney’s Office for the District of Massachusetts and the Civil Division of the United States Department of Justice (the United States) for the production of materials relating to the DePuy ASR™ XL Hip device. In July 2014, the United States notified the United States District Court for the District of Massachusetts that it had declined to intervene in a qui tam case filed pursuant to the False Claims Act against the companies.companies concerning the hip devices. In February 2016, the district courtDistrict Court granted the companies’ motion to dismiss with prejudice, unsealed the qui tam complaint, and denied the qui tam relators’ request for leave to file a further amended complaint. The qui tam relators appealed the case to the United States Court of Appeals for the First Circuit. In July 2017, the First Circuit affirmed the district court’sDistrict Court’s dismissal in part, reversed in part, and affirmed the decision to deny the relators’ request to file a third amended complaint. In March 2021, DePuy filed its motion to strike and dismiss the relators’ second amended complaint; the District Court denied DePuy’s motion to strike and dismiss in July 2021. DePuy filed a motion for reconsideration of the District Court’s July 2021 ruling. In November 2021, the District Court granted DePuy’s motion for reconsideration and dismissed the case with prejudice. The relators’ remaining claims are now pending beforeDistrict Court’s order was unsealed in December 2021. The Relators filed several post-dismissal motions, including a January 2022 omnibus motion for reconsideration. Following the district court, and fact discovery is currently scheduled to close in March 2020.District Court’s order dismissing the case with prejudice, DePuy filed a December 2021 motion seeking the recovery of attorneys’ fees.

In October 2012, Johnson & Johnson was contacted by the California Attorney General'sGeneral’s office regarding a multi-state Attorney General investigation of the marketing of surgical mesh products for hernia and urogynecological purposes by Johnson & Johnson'sJohnson’s subsidiary, Ethicon, Inc. (Ethicon). In May 2016, California and Washington filed civil complaints against Johnson & Johnson, Ethicon and Ethicon US, LLC alleging violations of their consumer protection statutes. Similar complaints were filed against the companies by the following states: Kentucky, Mississippi, West Virginia and Oregon. In April 2019, Johnson & Johnson and Ethicon settled the Washington case. The California case started trial in July 2019 and concluded in September

97



2019. In January 2020, the court found in favor of the state and awarded the state civil penalties of approximately $344 million. The Company intends to appeal when further proceedings are concluded in the trial court. Similar complaints were filed against the companies by Kentucky in August 2016, by Mississippi in October 2017, by West Virginia in September 2019 and by Oregon in December 2019. The trial date for the Kentucky case was scheduled for September 2019 but has been adjourned and no new trial date has been scheduled. In October 2019, Johnson & Johnson and Ethicon settled the multi-state investigation with 41 other states and the District of Columbia.
In December 2012, Therakos, Inc. (Therakos), formerlyJanuary 2020, the Court in California issued a subsidiarystatement of Johnson & Johnson and partdecision, finding in favor of the Ortho-Clinical Diagnostics, Inc. (OCD) franchise, receivedState of California, and awarded civil penalties in the amount of $344 million. In April 2020, the Court in California denied the Company’s motion for a letter fromnew trial. In August 2020, the civil division of the United States Attorney's Office for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania informing Therakos that the United States Attorney's Office was investigating the sales and marketing of Uvadex® (methoxsalen) and the Uvar Xts® and Cellex® Systems during the period 2000Court entered judgment with respect to the present.penalties of $344 million, but denied the Attorney General’s request for injunctive relief. The United States Attorney's Office requested that OCD and Johnson & Johnson preserve documents that could relate toCompany is appealing the investigation. Therakos was subsequently acquired by an affiliatepenalty judgment. In April 2020, the Company settled the West Virginia case. In October 2020, the Company settled with the Attorney General of Gores Capital Partners III, L.P.Oregon. Trial in January 2013, and OCD was divested in June 2014. Following the divestiture of OCD, Johnson & Johnson retains OCD’s portion of any liability that may result from the investigationKentucky matter is scheduled for activity that occurred prior to the sale of Therakos. In March 2014 and March 2016, the United States Attorney’s Office requested that Johnson & Johnson produce certain documents, and Johnson & Johnson is cooperating with those requests.May 2023.

In June 2014, the Mississippi Attorney General filed a complaint in Chancery Court of The First Judicial District of Hinds County, Mississippi against Johnson & Johnson and Johnson & Johnson Consumer Companies, Inc. (now known as Johnson & Johnson Consumer Inc.) (JJCI)(collectively, JJCI). The complaint alleges that defendantsJJCI violated the Mississippi Consumer Protection Act by
failing to disclose alleged health risks associated with female consumers'consumers’ use of talc contained in JOHNSON'SJOHNSON’S® Baby Powder and JOHNSON'SJOHNSON’S® Shower to Shower (a product divested in 2012) and seeks injunctive and monetary relief. The matter is stayed pending interlocutory appeal of a December 2018 denial of Johnson & Johnson and JJCI's motionJJCI moved for summary judgment.judgment on the grounds that the State’s claim was barred by preemption, which the trial court denied. The Mississippi Supreme Court granted J&JJohnson & Johnson and JJCI'sJJCI’s request to file an interlocutory appeal of the denial of the motion for summary judgment in late 20192019. Briefing and it will soon establishoral argument were completed. Thereafter, the Court rejected the interlocutory appeal in April 2021 and remanded the matter to the trial court. Thereafter, the State moved for a briefing schedule.trial setting. JJCI objected to any trial setting due to the LTL Bankruptcy and that any decision on whether the stay applied should be deferred to the LTL Bankruptcy court. The State opposed any stay and argued that the trial court should decide issues concerning the stay. The motion for trial setting and JJCI’s objections were heard in November 2021 and in January 2022, the Court granted plaintiff’s motion for trial setting and directed the parties to consult with the Court administrator to secure a trial date. That process is underway. In August 2021, JJCI filed a Petition for Writ of Certiorari in the United States Supreme Court as to the Mississippi Supreme Court’s ruling of April 2021, the State responded to the Petition for Writ of Certiorari in November 2021, the JJCI filed a reply in November 2021, and the United States Supreme Court denied the Petition for Writ of Certiorari in December 2021.

In January 2020, the State of New Mexico filed a consumer protection case alleging that the Company deceptively marketed and sold its talcum powder products by making misrepresentations about the safety of the products and the presence of carcinogens, including asbestos. The State of New Mexico filed an Amended Complaint in March 2020. The Company moved to dismiss certain of the claims in the Amended Complaint, which was granted. The Company then filed a motion for partial judgment on the pleadings in December 2020, which was denied. The Company made its first document production in February 2021 and discovery is currently scheduled to close on April 25, 2022.

Forty-two states and the District of Columbia have commenced a joint investigation into the Company’s marketing of its talcum powder products. At this time, the multi-state group has not asserted any claims against the Company. Five states have issued Civil Investigative Demands seeking documents and other information. The Company has alsoproduced documents to Arizona,
98


North Carolina, Texas, and Washington and entered into confidentiality agreements. The Company has not received inquiriesany follow up requests from several other State Attorneys General.those states.

In March 2016, Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (JPI) received a Civil Investigative Demand from the United States Attorney’s Office for the Southern District of New York related to JPI’s contractual relationships with pharmacy benefit managers over the period from January 1, 2006 to the present with regard to certain of JPI'sJPI’s pharmaceutical products. The demand was issued in connection with an investigation under the False Claims Act. The Company has provided documents in response to the demand.

In July 2016, Johnson & Johnson and Janssen Products LP were served with a qui tam complaint pursuant to the False Claims Act filed in the United States District Court for the District of New Jersey alleging the off-label promotion of two HIV products, PREZISTA® and INTELENCE®, and anti-kickback violations in connection with the promotion of these products. The complaint was filed under seal in December 2012. The federal and state governments have declined to intervene, and the lawsuit is being prosecuted by the relators. The Court denied summary judgment on all claims in December 2021.

InDaubert motions were granted in part and denied in part in January 2017, Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (JPI) received a Civil Investigative Demand from the United States Department of Justice relating to allegations concerning the sales and marketing practices of OLYSIO®. In December 2017, Johnson & Johnson and JPI were served with a whistleblower lawsuit filed in the United States District Court for the Central District of California alleging the off-label promotion of OLYSIO® and additional products, including NUCYNTA®, XARELTO®, LEVAQUIN® and REMICADE®.  At this time, the federal and state governments have declined to intervene2022, and the lawsuit, whichcase is relatedproceeding to the Civil Investigative Demand, is being prosecuted by a former company employee.  The United States District Court for the Central District of California dismissed the claim in April 2018. In May 2018, the relator filed a notice of appeal to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. In January 2020, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit dismissed the relator's appeal.trial.

In November 2018, a second whistleblower lawsuit was unsealed in the United States District Court for the Central District of California. The lawsuit was substantially similar to the lawsuit under appeal but was brought in the name of the original relator. The federal and state governments declined to intervene in the second suit, and the relator moved to dismiss the lawsuit without prejudice. In April 2019, the court granted the relator's motion and dismissed the complaint without prejudice.

In March 2017, Janssen Biotech, Inc. (JBI) received a Civil Investigative Demand from the United States Department of Justice regarding a False Claims Act investigation concerning management and advisory services provided to rheumatology and gastroenterology practices that purchased REMICADE® or SIMPONI ARIA®. In August 2019, the UnitesUnited States Department of Justice notified Janssen Biotech, Inc.JBI that it was closing the investigation. In January 2020, Janssen Biotech, Inc. was served with a newly-unsealed qui tam suit filed inSubsequently, the U.S.United States District Court for the District of Massachusetts.Massachusetts unsealed a qui tam False Claims Act complaint, which was served on the Company. The Department of Justice had declined to intervene in the qui tam lawsuit in August 2019. The Company filed a motion to dismiss, which was granted in part and denied in part. Discovery is underway.

98




In April and September 2017, Johnson & Johnson received subpoenas from the United States Attorney for the District of Massachusetts seeking documents broadly relating to pharmaceutical copayment support programs for DARZALEX®, OLYSIO®, REMICADE®, SIMPONI®, STELARA®and ZYTIGA®. The subpoenas also seek documents relating to Average Manufacturer Price and Best Price reporting to the Center for Medicare and Medicaid Services related to those products, as well as rebate payments to state Medicaid agencies. The Company has provided documents in response to the subpoenas.

In June 2017, Johnson & Johnson received a subpoena from the United States Attorney'sAttorney’s Office for the District of Massachusetts seeking information regarding practices pertaining to the sterilization of DePuy Synthes, Inc.(DePuy) spinal implants at three hospitals in Boston as well as interactions of employees of Company subsidiaries with physicians at these hospitals. Johnson & Johnson and DePuy Synthes, Inc. have produced documents in response to the subpoena and are fully cooperating with the government’s investigation.

In July 2018, the Public Prosecution Service in Rio de Janeiro and representatives from the Brazilian antitrust authority CADE inspected the offices of more than 30 companies including Johnson & Johnson do Brasil Indústria e Comércio de Produtos para Saúde Ltda. The authorities appear to be investigating allegations of possible anti-competitive behavior and possible improper payments in the medical device industry. The Company continues to respond to inquiries regarding the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act from the United States Department of Justice and the United States Securities and Exchange Commission have made additional inquiries, and Johnson & Johnson do Brasil Indústria e Comércio de Produtos para Saúde Ltda.is cooperating with those requests.Commission.

In January 2020, the New Mexico Attorney General’s Office filed a suit against Johnson & Johnson and Johnson & Johnson Consumer Companies, Inc. in the First Judicial District Court, New Mexico. The suit relates to the safety and marketing of the Company’s talc products. The State included claims for violations of the New Mexico Unfair Practices Act, Medicaid Fraud Act, Fraud Against Taxpayers Act, Fraud and Negligent Misrepresentation, Negligence and Unjust Enrichment. Other state Attorneys General have informed the Company that they are conducting an inquiry into this matter.

From time to time, the Company has received requests from a variety of United States Congressional Committees to produce information relevant to ongoing congressional inquiries. It is the policy of Johnson & Johnson to cooperate with these inquiries by producing the requested information.
GENERAL LITIGATION
In May 2014, two purported class actions were filed in federal court, one in the United States District Court for the Central District of California and one in the United States District Court for the Southern District of Illinois, against Johnson & Johnson and Johnson & Johnson Consumer Companies, Inc. (now known as Johnson & Johnson Consumer Inc.) (JJCI) alleging violations of state consumer fraud statutes based on nondisclosure of alleged health risks associated with talc contained in JOHNSON'S® Baby Powder and JOHNSON'S® Shower to Shower (a product no longer sold by JJCI). Both cases seek injunctive relief and monetary damages; neither includes a claim for personal injuries. In October 2016, both cases were transferred to the United States District Court for the District Court of New Jersey as part of a newly created federal multi-district litigation. In July 2017, the district court granted Johnson & Johnson's and JJCI’s motion to dismiss one of the cases. In September 2018, the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit affirmed this dismissal. In September 2017, the plaintiff in the second case voluntarily dismissed the complaint. In March 2018, the plaintiff in the second case refiled in Illinois State Court.

In August 2014, United States Customs and Border Protection (US CBP) issued a Penalty Notice against Janssen Ortho LLC (Janssen Ortho), assessing penalties for the alleged improper classification of darunavir ethanolate (the active pharmaceutical ingredient in PREZISTA®) in connection with its importation into the United States. In October 2014, Janssen Ortho submitted a Petition for Relief in response to the Penalty Notice. In May 2015, US CBP issued an Amended Penalty Notice assessing substantial penalties and Janssen Ortho filed a Petition for Relief in July 2015. In May 2019, US CBP issued its Mitigation Decision and determined that Janssen Ortho had negligently misrepresented that darunavir ethanolate is entitled to duty free treatment. In June 2019, Janssen Ortho filed a Supplemental Petition for Relief. The Penalties Proceeding will be impacted by the related Classification Litigation pending in the United States Court of International Trade. The Classification Litigation will determine whether darunavir ethanolate was properly classified as exempt from duties upon importation into the United States. The trial in the Classification Litigation was held in July 2019. In February 2020, the Court ruled that darunavir ethanolate is eligible for duty free treatment.

In March and April 2015, over 30 putative class action complaints were filed by contact lens patients in a number of courts around the United States against Johnson & Johnson Vision Care, Inc. (JJVCI) and other contact lens manufacturers, distributors, and retailers, alleging vertical and horizontal conspiracies to fix the retail prices of contact lenses. The complaints

99



allege that the manufacturers reached agreements with each other and certain distributors and retailers concerning the prices at which some contact lenses could be sold to consumers. The plaintiffs are seeking damages and injunctive relief. All of the class action cases were transferred to the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida in June 2015. The plaintiffs filed a consolidated class action complaint in November 2015. In December 2018, the district court granted the plaintiffs'Discovery and pre-trial motion for class certification. Defendants filed two motions for interlocutory appeal of class certification to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit. Both motions were denied. Defendants' motions for summary judgment were denied in November 2019.practice are complete. Trial is scheduled for June 2020.to begin in March 2022.
In August 2015, two third-party payors filed a
Beginning in September 2017, multiple purported class action in the United States District Court for the Eastern Districtactions were filed on behalf of Louisiana against Janssen Research & Development, LLC, Janssen Ortho LLC, Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Ortho-McNeil-Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson (as well as certain Bayer entities), alleging that the defendants improperly marketed and promoted XARELTOindirect purchasers of REMICADE® as safer and more effective than less expensive alternative medications while failing to fully disclose its risks. The complaint seeks damages.
In September 2017, Pfizer, Inc. (Pfizer) filed an antitrust complaint against Johnson & Johnson and Janssen Biotech, Inc. (collectively, Janssen) in United States District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania. Pfizer allegesalleging that Janssen has violated federal antitrust laws through its contracting strategies for REMICADE®. The cases were consolidated for pre-trial purposes as In re
99


REMICADE® Antitrust Litigation in United States District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania. The consolidated complaint seeks damages and injunctive relief. Discovery is ongoing.

Beginning in September 2017, multiple purported class actions of direct and indirect purchasers were filed against Johnson & Johnson and Janssen Biotech, Inc. (collectively, Janssen) alleging that Janssen’s REMICADE® contracting strategies violated federal and state antitrust and consumer laws and seeking damages and injunctive relief. In November 2017, the cases were consolidated for pre-trial purposes in United States District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania as In re Remicade Antitrust Litigation. Motions to dismiss were denied in both the direct and indirect purchaser cases. A motion to compel arbitration of the direct purchaser case was denied by the district court. The United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit reversed the district court's ruling.

In June 2018, Walgreen Co. and Kroger Co,Co., filed an antitrust complaint against Johnson & Johnson and Janssen Biotech, Inc. (collectively, Janssen) in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania. The complaint alleges that Janssen has violated federal antitrust laws through its contracting strategies for REMICADE®. The complaint seeks damages and injunctive relief. In March 2019, summary judgment was granted in favor of Janssen. This ruling is on appeal toIn February 2020, the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit.Circuit reversed the District Court’s decision. This matter was settled in January 2022.

In June 2019, the United States Federal Trade Commission (FTC) issued a Civil Investigative Demand to Johnson & Johnson in connection with its investigation of whether Janssen’s REMICADE® contracting practices violate federal antitrust laws. The Company has produced documents and information responsive to the Civil Investigative Demand.

In October 2017, certain United States service members and their families brought a complaint against a number of pharmaceutical and medical devices companies, including Johnson & Johnson and certain of its subsidiaries in United States District Court for the District of Columbia, alleging that the defendants violated the United States Anti-Terrorism Act. The complaint alleges that the defendants provided funding for terrorist organizations through their sales practices pursuant to pharmaceutical and medical device contracts with the Iraqi Ministry of Health. In July 2020, the District Court dismissed the complaint. In January 2019, plaintiffs' motion to file a Second Amended Complaint adding plaintiffs to2022, the lawsuit was granted. In April 2019,United States Court of Appeals for the Company moved to dismissDistrict of Columbia Circuit reversed the Second Amended Complaint.District Court’s decision.

In October 2018, two separate putative class actions were filed against Actelion Pharmaceutical Ltd., Actelion Pharmaceuticals US,U.S., Inc., and Actelion Clinical Research, Inc. (collectively Actelion) in United States District Court for the District of Maryland and United States District Court for the District of Columbia. The complaints allege that Actelion violated state and federal antitrust and unfair competition laws by allegedly refusing to supply generic pharmaceutical manufacturers with samples of TRACLEER®. TRACLEER® is subject to a Risk Evaluation and Mitigation Strategy required by the Food and Drug Administration, which imposes restrictions on distribution of the product. In January 2019, the plaintiffs dismissed the District of Columbia case and filed a consolidated complaint in the United States District Court for the District of Maryland. In October 2019, the Court granted Actelion’s motion to dismiss the amended complaint. Plaintiffs have appealedIn April 2021, the decision.United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit reversed and remanded. Discovery is ongoing.

In December 2018, Janssen Biotech, Inc., Janssen Oncology, Inc, Janssen Research & Development, LLC, and Johnson & Johnson (collectively, Janssen) were served with a qui tam complaint filed on behalf of the United States, 28 states, and the District of Columbia. The complaint, which was filed in December 2017 in United States District Court for the Northern District of California, alleges that Janssen violated the federal False Claims Act and state law when providing pricing information for ZYTIGA® to the government in connection with direct government sales and government-funded drug

100



reimbursement programs. At this time, the federal and state governments have declined to intervene. The case has been transferred to United States District Court for the District of New Jersey. Janssen has movedJanssen’s motion to dismiss the complaint.

In April 2019, Blue Cross & Blue Shield of Louisiana and HMO Louisiana, Inc. filed a class action complaint against Janssen Biotech, Inc, Janssen Oncology, Inc, Janssen Research & Development, LLC and BTG International Limitedwas denied in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia. Several additional complaints were filed thereafter. The complaints generally allege that the defendants violated the antitrust and consumer protections laws of several states and the Sherman ActDecember 2021.
by pursuing patent litigation relating to ZYTIGA
®in order to delay generic entry. The case has been transferred to the United States District Court for the District of New Jersey and consolidated for pretrial purposes. 

In May 2019, a class action antitrust complaint was filed against Janssen R&D Ireland (Janssen) and Johnson & Johnson.Johnson in the United States District Court for the Northern District of California. The complaint alleges that Janssen violated federal and state antitrust and consumer protection laws by agreeing to exclusivity provisions in its agreements with Gilead concerning the development and marketing of combination antiretroviral therapies (cART) to treat HIV. The complaint also alleges that Gilead entered into similar agreements with Bristol-Myers-SquibbBristol-Myers Squibb and Japan Tobacco. The case is pendingIn March 2020, the Court granted in the United States District Court for the District of Northern California. The defendants havepart and denied in part defendants’ motions to dismiss. Plaintiffs filed motionsan amended complaint in April 2020. Defendants moved to dismiss the amended complaint.

In July 2020, the Court granted in part and denied in part the renewed motion to dismiss. In December 2021, several insurance companies and other payers filed individual “Opt-Out” complaints containing allegations similar to the original complaint. Discovery is ongoing.

In October 2019, Innovative Health, LLC filed a complaint against Biosense Webster, Inc. (BWI) in the United StatesDistrict Court for the Middle District of California. The complaint alleges that certain of BWI’s business practices and contractual terms violate the antitrust laws of the United States and the State of California by restricting competition in the sale of High Density Mapping Catheters and Ultrasound Catheters. In January 2020, BWI filed a motion to dismiss the complaint. In August 2020, the Court granted in part and denied in part BWI’s motion to dismiss. In December 2021, BWI filed a motion for summary judgment. The trial is set for April 2022.


The CompanyIn November 2019, Johnson & Johnson received noticesa demand for indemnification from Pfizer Inc. and Sanofi Consumer Health, Inc. in November 2019 and Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc. in January 2020 tendering for defense and indemnification of legal claims related, pursuant to personal injury matters and putative class actions in the U.S. and Canada related to Zantac (ranitidine) products. The notices were based on certain indemnification provisions regarding assumed liabilities in connection with the2006 Stock and Asset Purchase Agreement between Pfizer,the Company and Pfizer. Also in November 2019, Johnson & Johnson Inc. received a demand for indemnification from Sanofi Consumer Health, Inc., pursuant to the 2016 Asset Purchase Agreement between Johnson & Johnson Inc. and Sanofi. In January 2020, Johnson & Johnson received a demand for indemnification from
100


Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc., pursuant to the 2006 Asset Purchase Agreement among the Company, in 2006.Pfizer, and Boehringer Ingelheim. The notices seek indemnification for legal claims related to over-the-counter ZANTAC® (ranitidine) products. Plaintiffs in the underlying suitsactions allege generally that ZantacZANTAC® and other over-the-counter ranitidine medications contain unsafe levels of NDMA (N-nitrosodimethylamine) and can cause and/or have caused various cancers in patients using the products, for which plaintiffs are seekingand seek injunctive and monetary relief.

In October 2020, Fortis Advisors LLC (Fortis), in its capacity as representative of the former stockholders of Auris Health Inc. (Auris), filed a complaint against Johnson & Johnson, Ethicon Inc., and certain named officers and employees (collectively, Ethicon) in the Court of Chancery of the State of Delaware. The complaint alleges breach of contract, fraud, and other causes of action against Ethicon in connection with Ethicon’s acquisition of Auris in 2019. The complaint seeks damages and other relief. In December 2021, the Court granted in part and denied in part defendants’ motion to dismiss certain causes of action. All claims against the individual defendants were dismissed.

Beginning in May 2021, multiple putative class actions were filed in state and federal courts (California, Florida, New York, and New Jersey) against various Johnson & Johnson entities alleging violations of state consumer fraud statutes based on nondisclosure of alleged benzene contamination of certain Neutrogena and Aveeno sunscreen products and the affirmative promotion of those products as “safe”; and, in at least one case, alleging astrict liability manufacturing defect and failure to warn claims, asserting that the named plaintiffs suffered unspecified injuries as a result of alleged exposure to benzene. The Judicial Panel on Multi-District Litigation has consolidated all pending actions, except one product liability case and one case pending in New Jersey state court, in the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida, Fort Lauderdale Division. In October 2021, the Company reached an agreement in principle for the settlement of a nationwide class, encompassing the claims of the consolidated actions, subject to approval by the Florida federal Court. In December 2021, plaintiffs in the consolidated actions filed a motion for preliminary approval of a nationwide class settlement.

Johnson & Johnson (subsequently substituted by Johnson & Johnson Consumer Inc. (JJCI)) along with more than 120 other companies, is a defendant in a cost recovery and contribution action brought by Occidental Chemical Corporation in June 2018 in the United States District Court for the District of New Jersey, related to the clean-up of a section of the Lower Passaic River in New Jersey.

Johnson & Johnson or its subsidiaries are also parties to a number of proceedings brought under the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act, commonly known as Superfund, and comparable state, local or foreign laws in which the primary relief sought is the cost of past and/or future remediation.





101



22.
20. Restructuring
TheIn the fiscal second quarter of 2018, the Company announced plans to implement a series of actions across its Global Supply Chain that are intended to focus resources and increase investments in the critical capabilities, technologies and solutions necessary to manufacture and supply its product portfolio, enhance agility and drive growth. The Global Supply Chain actions will include expanding the use of strategic collaborations and bolstering initiatives to reduce complexity, improve cost-competitiveness, enhance capabilities and optimize the Supply Chain network. For additional details on the global supply chain restructuring strategic collaborations see Note 20 to the Consolidated Financial Statements. In 2019,fiscal year 2021, the Company recorded a pre-tax charge of $0.6$0.5 billion, which is included on the following lines of the Consolidated Statement of Earnings, $0.3 billion in restructuring, $0.2$0.1 billion in other (income) expense and $0.1 billion in cost of products sold. Total project costs of approximately $0.8$1.8 billion have been recorded since the restructuring was announced. See the following table for additional details on the restructuring program.
In total, the Company expects the Global Supply Chain actions to generate approximately $0.6 billion to $0.8 billion in annual pre-tax cost savings that will be substantially delivered by the end of 2022. The program is set to be completed at the end of 2022.The Company expects to record pre-tax restructuring charges of approximately $1.9$2.1 billion to $2.3 billion, over the 4 to 5 year period of this activity. These costs are associated with network optimizations, exit costs and accelerated depreciation and amortization.   

The following table summarizes the severance charges and the associated spending under these initiatives through the fiscal year ended 2019:2021:
(Dollars in Millions)SeveranceAsset Write-offs
Other(2)
 Total
Reserve balance, December 31, 2017229

38
 267
      
2018 activity(35)
10
 (25)
      
Reserve balance, December 30, 2018194

48
 242
      
Current year activity:     
   Charges
151
460
 611
   Cash payments(30)
(424) (454)
   Settled non cash
(151)(68)
(3) 
(219)
Reserve balance, December 29, 2019(1)
$164

16
 180
      
(Dollars in Millions)SeveranceAsset Write-offs/Sales
Other(2)
Total
Reserve balance, December 29, 2019$164 — 16 180 
2020 activity(29)— (7)(36)
Reserve balance, January 3, 2021135 — 144 
Current year activity:
   Charges— 53 420 473 
   Cash settlements(23)0(404)(427)
   Settled non cash— (53)0(53)
Reserve balance, January 2, 2022(1)
$112 — 25 137 
(1) Cash outlays for severance are expected to be substantially paid out over the next 2 yearsyear in accordance with the Company's plans and local laws.
(2) Other includes project expense such as salaries for employees supporting these initiatives and consulting expenses.
(3)
Relates to pension related actuarial losses associated with the transfer of employees to Jabil Inc. as part of the strategic collaboration.

The Company continuously reevaluates its severance reserves related to restructuring and the timing of payments due to the planned release of associates regarding several longer-term projects. The Company believes that the existing severance reserves are sufficient to cover the Global Supply Chain plans given the period over which the actions will take place. The Company will continue to assess and make adjustments as necessary if additional amounts become probable and estimable.

102




Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

To the Board of Directors and Shareholders of Johnson & Johnson

Opinions on the Financial Statements and Internal Control over Financial Reporting
We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Johnson & Johnson and its subsidiaries (the “Company”) as of December 29, 2019January 2, 2022 and December 30, 2018,January 3, 2021, and the related consolidated statements of earnings, of comprehensive income, of equity and of cash flows for each of the three fiscal years in the period ended December 29, 2019,January 2, 2022, including the related notes (collectively referred to as the “consolidated financial statements”). We also have audited the Company's internal control over financial reporting as of December 29, 2019January 2, 2022, based on criteria established in Internal Control - Integrated Framework (2013) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO).

In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of the Company as of December 29, 2019January 2, 2022 and December 30, 2018,January 3, 2021, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for each of the three fiscal years in the period ended December 29, 2019January 2, 2022 in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. Also in our opinion, the Company maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 29, 2019,January 2, 2022, based on criteria established in Internal Control - Integrated Framework (2013) issued by the COSO.

BasisReport of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

To the Board of Directors and Shareholders of Johnson & Johnson

Opinions on the Financial Statements and Internal Control over Financial Reporting
We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Johnson & Johnson and its subsidiaries (the “Company”) as of January 2, 2022 and January 3, 2021, and the related consolidated statements of earnings, of comprehensive income, of equity and of cash flows for Opinions
The Company's management is responsible for these consolidated financial statements, for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting, and for its assessmenteach of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, includedthree fiscal years in the accompanying Management's Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting. Our responsibility isperiod ended January 2, 2022, including the related notes (collectively referred to express opinions onas the Company’s consolidated“consolidated financial statements and onstatements”). We also have audited the Company's internal control over financial reporting as of January 2, 2022, based on our audits. We are a public accounting firm registered with the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (PCAOB) and are required to be independent with respect to the Companycriteria established in accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.
We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audits to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the consolidated financial statements are free of material misstatement, whether due to error or fraud, and whether effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material respects.
Our audits of the consolidated financial statements included performing procedures to assess the risks of material misstatement of the consolidated financial statements, whether due to error or fraud, and performing procedures that respond to those risks. Such procedures included examining, on a test basis, evidence regarding the amounts and disclosures in the consolidated financial statements. Our audits also included evaluating the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the consolidated financial statements. Our audit of internal control over financial reporting included obtaining an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, assessing the risk that a material weakness exists, and testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control based on the assessed risk. Our audits also included performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinions.
As described in Management’s Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting, management has excluded Ci:z Holdings Co., Ltd., (“DR. CI:LABO”) from its assessment of internal control over financial reporting as of December 29, 2019, because it was acquired by the Company in a business combination during 2019. We have also excluded DR. CI:LABO from our audit of internal control over financial reporting. DR. CI:LABO is wholly-owned subsidiary whose total assets, excluding intangible assets and goodwill, and total sales excluded from management’s assessment and our audit of internal control over financial reporting represent less than 1% of each of the related consolidated financial statement amounts as of and for the fiscal year ended December 29, 2019.
Definition and Limitations of Internal Control over Financial Reporting
A company’s internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A company’s internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (i) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and

- Integrated Framework
103



dispositions of the assets of the company; (ii) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company; and (iii) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the company’s assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.
Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.
Critical Audit Matters
The critical audit matters communicated below are matters arising from the current period audit of the consolidated financial statements that were communicated or required to be communicated to the audit committee and that (i) relate to accounts or disclosures that are material to the consolidated financial statements and (ii) involved our especially challenging, subjective, or complex judgments. The communication of critical audit matters does not alter in any way our opinion on the consolidated financial statements, taken as a whole, and we are not, by communicating the critical audit matters below, providing separate opinions on the critical audit matters or on the accounts or disclosures to which they relate.
U.S. Pharmaceutical Rebate Reserves - Managed Care, Medicare and Medicaid
As described in Note 1 to the consolidated financial statements, the Company recognizes revenue from product sales when obligations under the terms of a contract with the customer are satisfied. Rebates and discounts provided to customers are accounted for as variable consideration and recorded as a reduction in sales. The liability for such rebates and discounts is recognized within Accrued Rebates, Returns and Promotions on the consolidated balance sheet. A significant portion of the liability related to rebates is from the sale of pharmaceutical goods within the U.S., primarily the Managed Care, Medicare and Medicaid programs, which amounted to $7.0 billion as of December 29, 2019. For significant rebate programs, which include the U.S. Managed Care, Medicare and Medicaid rebate programs, rebates and discounts estimated by management are based on contractual terms, historical experience, patient outcomes, trend analysis, and projected market conditions in the U.S. pharmaceutical market.
The principal considerations for our determination that performing procedures relating to U.S. pharmaceutical rebate reserves - Managed Care, Medicare and Medicaid is a critical audit matter are the use of significant judgment by management due to the significant measurement uncertainty involved in developing these reserves. This in turn led to a high degree of auditor judgment and subjectivity and audit effort in applying procedures for the assumptions related to contractual terms with customers, historical experience, patient outcomes, trend analysis, and projected market conditions in the U.S.
Addressing the matter involved performing procedures and evaluating audit evidence in connection with forming our overall opinion on the consolidated financial statements. These procedures included testing the effectiveness of controls relating to U.S. pharmaceutical rebate reserves - Managed Care, Medicare and Medicaid, including controls over the assumptions used to estimate these rebates. These procedures also included, among others, (i) developing an independent estimate of the rebates by utilizing third party information on price and market conditions in the U.S., the terms of the specific rebate programs, and the historical trend of actual rebate claims paid; (ii) testing rebate claims processed by the Company, including evaluating those claims for consistency with the contractual and mandated terms of the Company’s rebate arrangements; and (iii) comparing the independent estimate to management’s estimates.
Litigation Contingencies - Talc
As described in Notes 1 and 21 to the consolidated financial statements, the Company records accruals for loss contingencies associated with legal matters, including talc, when it is probable that a liability will be incurred and the amount of the loss can be reasonably estimated. To the extent adverse verdicts have been rendered against the Company, management does not record an accrual until a loss is determined to be probable and can be reasonably estimated. For these matters, management is unable to estimate the reasonably possible loss or range of loss. The ability to make such estimates and judgments can be affected by various factors, including, among other things, whether damages sought in the proceedings are unsubstantiated or indeterminate; scientific and legal discovery has not commenced or is not complete; proceedings are in early stages; matters present legal uncertainties; there are significant facts in dispute; procedural or jurisdictional issues; the uncertainty and unpredictability of the number of potential claims; or there are numerous parties involved. There have been verdicts against the Company for this matter, including a verdict in July 2018 of $4.7 billion. As described by management, the Company believes

104



that it has strong grounds on appeal to overturn these verdicts. The Company has established an accrual primarily for defense costs in connection with product liability litigation associated with body powders containing talc.
The principal considerations for our determination that performing procedures relating to the talc litigation is a critical audit matter are the use of significant judgment by management when assessing the likelihood of a loss being incurred and management’s determination of whether a reasonable estimate of the loss or range of loss for each claim can be made. This in turn led to a high degree of auditor judgment and effort in evaluating management’s assessment of the loss contingencies associated with this litigation.
Addressing the matter involved performing procedures and evaluating audit evidence in connection with forming our overall opinion on the consolidated financial statements. These procedures included testing the effectiveness of controls relating to management’s evaluation of the talc litigation, including controls over determining whether a loss is probable and whether the amount of loss can be reasonably estimated, as well as financial statement disclosures. These procedures also included, among others, (i) gaining an understanding of the Company’s process around the accounting and reporting for the talc litigation; (ii) discussing the status of significant known actual and potential litigation with the Company’s in-house legal counsel, as well as external counsel when deemed necessary; (iii) obtaining and evaluating the letters of audit inquiry with internal and external legal counsel for significant litigation; (iv) evaluating the reasonableness of management’s assessment regarding whether an unfavorable outcome is reasonably possible or probable and reasonably estimable; and (v) evaluating the sufficiency of the Company’s litigation contingencies disclosures.
Litigation - Opioids
As described in Notes 18 and 21 to the consolidated financial statements, the Company records accruals for loss contingencies associated with legal matters, including opioids, when it is probable that a liability will be incurred and the amount of the loss can be reasonably estimated. To the extent adverse verdicts have been rendered against the Company, management does not record an accrual until a loss is determined to be probable and can be reasonably estimated. For these matters, management is unable to estimate the reasonably possible loss or range of loss. Amounts accrued for legal contingencies often result from a complex series of judgments about future events and uncertainties that rely heavily on estimates and assumptions including timing of related payments. The ability to make such estimates and judgments can be affected by various factors, including, among other things, whether damages sought in the proceedings are unsubstantiated or indeterminate; matters present legal uncertainties; there are significant facts in dispute; procedural or jurisdictional issues; the uncertainty and unpredictability of the number of potential claims; or there are numerous parties involved. The Company has been named in numerous lawsuits brought by certain state and local governments related to opioids matters. The trial in the matter filed by the Oklahoma Attorney General resulted in a judgment against the Company in the amount of $572 million which was subsequently reduced to $465 million. The Company has appealed the judgment and, as described by management, believes that it has strong grounds to overturn this judgment. Separately in October 2019, the Company announced a proposed agreement in principle that would include the Company paying $4 billion as settlement of these lawsuits, subject to various conditions and an agreement being finalized. The Company cannot predict if or when the agreement will be finalized. The Company has recorded a pre-tax charge of $4 billion during the fiscal year ended December 29, 2019 for this matter.
The principal considerations for our determination that performing procedures relating to the opioids litigation is a critical audit matter are the use of significant judgment by management when assessing the likelihood of a loss being incurred for the judgment against the Company in Oklahoma and management’s determination of whether a reasonable estimate of the range of loss for the proposed agreement in principle to settle opioids litigation can be made. This in turn led to a high degree of auditor judgment and effort in evaluating management’s assessment of the loss contingencies associated with this litigation.
Addressing the matter involved performing procedures and evaluating audit evidence in connection with forming our overall opinion on the consolidated financial statements. These procedures included testing the effectiveness of controls relating to management’s evaluation of the opioid litigation, including controls over determining whether a loss is probable and whether the amount of loss can be reasonably estimated, as well as financial statement disclosures. These procedures also included, among others, (i) gaining an understanding of the Company’s process around the accounting and reporting for the opioids litigation; (ii) discussing the status of significant known actual and potential litigation and ongoing settlement negotiations with the Company’s in-house legal counsel, as well as external counsel when deemed necessary; (iii) obtaining and evaluating the letters of audit inquiry with internal and external legal counsel for significant litigation; (iv) evaluating the reasonableness of management’s assessment regarding whether an unfavorable outcome is reasonably possible or probable and reasonably estimable; and (v) evaluating the sufficiency of the Company’s litigation contingencies disclosures.


105



/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP Florham Park, New Jersey February 18, 2020
We have served as the Company’s auditor since at least 1920. We have not been able to determine the specific year we began serving as auditor of the Company.


106



Management’s Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting

Under Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, management is required to assess the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting as of the end of each fiscal year and report, based on that assessment, whether the Company’s internal control over financial reporting is effective.
Management of the Company is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting. The Company’s internal control over financial reporting is designed to provide reasonable assurance as to the reliability of the Company’s financial reporting and the preparation of external financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles.
Internal controls over financial reporting, no matter how well designed, have inherent limitations. Therefore, internal control over financial reporting determined to be effective can provide only reasonable assurance with respect to financial statement preparation and may not prevent or detect all misstatements. Moreover, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.
The Company’s management has assessed the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 29, 2019. In making this assessment, the Company used the criteria established(2013) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO).

In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred to above present fairly, in “Internal Control-Integrated Framework (2013).” These criteria are inall material respects, the areasfinancial position of control environment, risk assessment, control activities, informationthe Company as of January 2, 2022 and communication,January 3, 2021, and monitoring. The Company’s assessment included extensive documenting, evaluating and testing the design and operating effectivenessresults of its internal controls over financial reporting.
The Company acquired Ci:z Holdings Co., Ltd., (DR. CI:LABO), in a business combination during January 2019. DR. CI:LABO's total assets, excluding intangible assetsoperations and goodwill, and total sales represented less than1% ofits cash flows for each of the related consolidated financial statement amounts as of and for thethree fiscal year ended December 29, 2019. As the acquisition occurredyears in the fiscal year 2019, the scope of the Company's assessment of the design and effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting for the fiscal year 2019 excluded the above mentioned acquisition. This exclusion isperiod ended January 2, 2022 in accordanceconformity with the SEC's general guidance that an assessment of a recently acquired business may be omitted from the scopeaccounting principles generally accepted in the yearUnited States of acquisition.
Based onAmerica. Also in our opinion, the Company’s processes and assessment, as described above, management has concluded that, as of December 29, 2019, the Company’s internal control over financial reporting was effective.
The effectiveness of the Company’sCompany maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 29, 2019 has been audited by PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, an independent registered public accounting firm, as statedJanuary 2, 2022, based on criteria established in their report, which appears herein.

/s/ Alex Gorsky/s/ Joseph J. Wolk
Alex GorskyJoseph J. Wolk
Chairman, Board of DirectorsExecutive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer
Chief Executive Officer


107



Shareholder Return Performance Graphs
Set forth below are line graphs comparing the cumulative total shareholder return on the Company’s Common Stock for periods of five years and ten years ending December 31, 2019, against the cumulative total return of the Standard & Poor’s 500 Stock Index, the Standard & Poor’s Pharmaceutical Index and the Standard & Poor’s Health Care Equipment Index. The graphs and tables assume that $100 was invested on December 31, 2014 and December 31, 2009 in each of the Company’s Common Stock, the Standard & Poor’s 500 Stock Index, the Standard & Poor’s Pharmaceutical Index and the Standard & Poor’s Health Care Equipment Index and that all dividends were reinvested.
5 Year Shareholder Return Performance J&J vs. Indices
jnj5yearshareholder2019.jpg
 201420152016201720182019
Johnson & Johnson$100.00$101.16$116.66$145.13$137.67$159.99
S&P 500 Index$100.00$101.37$113.49$138.26$132.19$173.80
S&P Pharmaceutical Index$100.00$105.79$104.13$117.22$126.71$145.83
S&P Healthcare Equipment Index$100.00$105.97$112.85$147.71$171.70$222.04
10 Year Shareholder Return Performance J&J vs. Indices
jnj10yearshareholder2019.jpg
 20092010201120122013201420152016201720182019
Johnson & Johnson$100.00$99.42$109.25$121.08$162.99$191.25$193.46$223.10$277.55$263.30$305.98
S&P 500 Index$100.00$115.06$117.48$136.27$180.39$205.06$207.88$232.73$283.51$271.06$356.39
S&P Pharmaceutical Index$100.00$100.77$118.67$135.79$183.63$224.43$237.41$233.70$263.08$284.37$327.28
S&P Healthcare Equipment Index$100.00$97.29$96.51$113.18$144.52$182.49$193.40$205.94$269.56$313.34$405.21

108


Item 9.CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE
Not applicable.
Item 9A.CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES
Disclosure Controls and Procedures.Internal Control - Integrated Framework At the end of the period covered by this Report, the Company evaluated the effectiveness of the design and operation of its disclosure controls and procedures. The Company’s disclosure controls and procedures are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed(2013) issued by the Company in the reports that it files or submits under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the SEC’s rules and forms. Disclosure controls and procedures include, without limitation, controls and procedures designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed by the Company in the reports that it files or submits under the Exchange Act is accumulated and communicated to the Company’s management, including its principal executive and principal financial officers, or persons performing similar functions, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure. Alex Gorsky, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer, and Joseph J. Wolk, Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer, reviewed and participated in this evaluation. Based on this evaluation, Messrs. Gorsky and Wolk concluded that, as of the end of the period covered by this Report, the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures were effectiveCOSO.
Reports on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting. The information called for by this item is incorporated herein by reference to "Management’s Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting", and the attestation regarding internal controls over financial reporting included in the "Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm" included in Item 8 of this Report.
Changes in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting.  During the fiscal quarter ended December 29, 2019, there were no changes in the Company’s internal control over financial reporting identified in connection with the evaluation required under Rules 13a-15 and 15d-15 under the Exchange Act that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, the Company’s internal control over financial reporting.
The Company is implementing a multi-year, enterprise-wide initiative to integrate, simplify and standardize processes and systems for the human resources, information technology, procurement, supply chain and finance functions. These are enhancements to support the growth of the Company’s financial shared service capabilities and standardize financial systems. This initiative is not in response to any identified deficiency or weakness in the Company’s internal control over financial reporting. In response to this initiative, the Company has and will continue to align and streamline the design and operation of its financial control environment.
Item 9B.OTHER INFORMATION
Not applicable.
PART III
Item 10.DIRECTORS, EXECUTIVE OFFICERS AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE
The information called for by this item is incorporated herein by reference to the discussion of the Audit Committee under the caption “Item 1. Election of Directors - Board Committees”; and the material under the captions “Item 1. Election of Directors” and “Stock Ownership and Section 16 Compliance – Delinquent Section 16(a) Reports” in the Proxy Statement; and the material under the caption “Executive Officers of the Registrant” in Part I of this Report.
The Company’s Code of Business Conduct, which covers all employees (including the Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer and Controller), meets the requirements of the SEC rules promulgated under Section 406 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. The Code of Business Conduct is available on the Company’s website at www.jnj.com/code-of-business-conduct, and copies are available to shareholders without charge upon written request to the Secretary at the Company’s principal executive offices. Any substantive amendment to the Code of Business Conduct or any waiver of the Code granted to the Chief Executive Officer, the Chief Financial Officer or the Controller will be posted on the Company’s website at www.investor.jnj.com/gov.cfm within five business days (and retained on the website for at least one year).
In addition, the Company has adopted a Code of Business Conduct & Ethics for Members of the Board of Directors and Executive Officers. The Code of Business Conduct & Ethics for Members of the Board of Directors and Executive Officers is available on the Company’s website at www.investor.jnj.com/gov/boardconduct.cfm, and copies are available to shareholders without charge upon written request to the Secretary at the Company’s principal executive offices. Any substantive amendment to the Code or any waiver of the Code granted to any member of the Board of Directors or any executive officer will be posted

109



on the Company’s website at www.investor.jnj.com/gov.cfm within five business days (and retained on the website for at least one year).
Item 11.EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
The information called for by this item is incorporated herein by reference to the material under the captions “Item 1. Election of Directors – Director Compensation,” and “Item 2. Compensation Committee Report,” “Compensation Discussion and Analysis” and “Executive Compensation Tables” in the Proxy Statement.
The material incorporated herein by reference to the material under the caption “Compensation Committee Report” in the Proxy Statement shall be deemed furnished, and not filed, in this Report and shall not be deemed incorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, as a result of this furnishing, except to the extent that the Company specifically incorporates it by reference.
Item 12.SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS
The information called for by this item is incorporated herein by reference to the material under the caption “Item 1. Stock Ownership and Section 16 Compliance” in the Proxy Statement; and Note 17 “Common Stock, Stock Option Plans and Stock Compensation Agreements” of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements in Item 8 of this Report.
Equity Compensation Plan Information
The following table provides certain information as of December 29, 2019 concerning the shares of the Company’s Common Stock that may be issued under existing equity compensation plans.
Plan Category
Number of Securities to
be Issued Upon Exercise of
Outstanding Options and Rights
 
Weighted Average
Exercise Price of
Outstanding Options and Rights
 
Number of Securities
Remaining Available for
Future Issuance Under Equity Compensation Plans(2)(3)
Equity Compensation Plans Approved by Security Holders(1)
130,579,915
 
$90.31
 314,776,315
Equity Compensation Plans Not Approved by Security Holders

 -
 -
Total130,579,915
 
$90.31
 314,776,315

(1)
Included in this category are the following equity compensation plans which have been approved by the Company’s shareholders: 2005 Long-Term Incentive Plan and 2012 Long-Term Incentive Plan.
(2)
This column excludes shares reflected under the column “Number of Securities to be Issued Upon Exercise of Outstanding Options and Rights.”
(3)
The 2005 Long-Term Incentive Plan expired April 26, 2012. All options and restricted shares granted subsequent to that date were under the 2012 Long-Term Incentive Plan.
Item 13.CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS, AND DIRECTOR INDEPENDENCE
The information called for by this item is incorporated herein by reference to the material under the captions “Item 1. Election of Directors - Director Independence” and “Related Person Transactions” in the Proxy Statement.
Item 14.PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTANT FEES AND SERVICES
The information called for by this item is incorporated herein by reference to the material under the caption “Item 3. Ratification of Appointment of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm” in the Proxy Statement.

110



PART IV
Item 15.EXHIBITS AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES
The following documents are filed as part of this report:
1.     Financial Statements
Consolidated Balance Sheets at end of Fiscal Years 2019 and 2018
Consolidated Statements of Earnings for Fiscal Years 2019, 2018 and 2017    
Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income for Fiscal Years 2019, 2018 and 2017
Consolidated Statements of Equity for Fiscal Years 2019, 2018 and 2017
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for Fiscal Years 2019, 2018 and 2017
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

To the Board of Directors and Shareholders of Johnson & Johnson

Opinions on the Financial Statements and Internal Control over Financial Reporting
We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Johnson & Johnson and its subsidiaries (the “Company”) as of January 2, 2022 and January 3, 2021, and the related consolidated statements of earnings, of comprehensive income, of equity and of cash flows for each of the three fiscal years in the period ended January 2, 2022, including the related notes (collectively referred to as the “consolidated financial statements”). We also have audited the Company's internal control over financial reporting as of January 2, 2022, based on criteria established in Internal Control - Integrated Framework (2013) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO).

In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of the Company as of January 2, 2022 and January 3, 2021, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for each of the three fiscal years in the period ended January 2, 2022 in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. Also in our opinion, the Company maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as of January 2, 2022, based on criteria established in Internal Control - Integrated Framework (2013) issued by the COSO.

Basis for Opinions
The Company's management is responsible for these consolidated financial statements, for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting, and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, included in the accompanying Management’s Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting. Our responsibility is to express opinions on the Company’s consolidated financial statements and on the Company's internal control over financial reporting based on our audits. We are a public accounting firm registered with the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (PCAOB) and are required to be independent with respect to the Company in accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.

We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audits to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the consolidated financial statements are free of material misstatement, whether due to error or fraud, and whether effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material respects.

Our audits of the consolidated financial statements included performing procedures to assess the risks of material misstatement of the consolidated financial statements, whether due to error or fraud, and performing procedures that respond to those risks. Such procedures included examining, on a test basis, evidence regarding the amounts and disclosures in the consolidated financial statements. Our audits also included evaluating the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the consolidated financial statements. Our audit of internal control over financial reporting included obtaining an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, assessing the risk that a material weakness exists, and testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control based on the assessed risk. Our audits also included performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinions.

Definition and Limitations of Internal Control over Financial Reporting
A company’s internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A company’s internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (i) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (ii) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company; and (iii) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the company’s assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.

Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.


Critical Audit Matters
The critical audit matters communicated below are matters arising from the current period audit of the consolidated financial statements that were communicated or required to be communicated to the audit committee and that (i) relate to accounts or
103


disclosures that are material to the consolidated financial statements and (ii) involved our especially challenging, subjective, or complex judgments. The communication of critical audit matters does not alter in any way our opinion on the consolidated financial statements, taken as a whole, and we are not, by communicating the critical audit matters below, providing separate opinions on the critical audit matters or on the accounts or disclosures to which they relate.

U.S. Pharmaceutical Rebate Reserves – Managed Care, Medicare and Medicaid
As described in Note 1 to the consolidated financial statements, the Company recognizes revenue from product sales when obligations under the terms of a contract with the customer are satisfied. Rebates and discounts provided to customers are accounted for as variable consideration and recorded as a reduction in sales. The liability for such rebates and discounts is recognized within Accrued Rebates, Returns, and Promotions on the consolidated balance sheet. A significant portion of the liability related to rebates is from the sale of pharmaceutical goods within the U.S., primarily the Managed Care, Medicare and Medicaid programs, which amounted to $7.7 billion as of January 2, 2022. For significant rebate programs, which include the U.S. Managed Care, Medicare and Medicaid rebate programs, rebates and discounts estimated by management are based on contractual terms, historical experience, patient outcomes, trend analysis, and projected market conditions in the U.S. pharmaceutical market.

The principal considerations for our determination that performing procedures relating to U.S. pharmaceutical rebate reserves - Managed Care, Medicare and Medicaid is a critical audit matter are the significant judgment by management due to the significant measurement uncertainty involved in developing these reserves and the high degree of auditor judgment, subjectivity and audit effort in performing procedures and evaluating the assumptions related to contractual terms, historical experience, patient outcomes, trend analysis, and projected market conditions in the U.S. pharmaceutical market.

Addressing the matter involved performing procedures and evaluating audit evidence in connection with forming our overall opinion on the consolidated financial statements. These procedures included testing the effectiveness of controls relating to U.S. pharmaceutical rebate reserves - Managed Care, Medicare and Medicaid, including controls over the assumptions used to estimate these rebates. These procedures also included, among others, (i) developing an independent estimate of the rebates by utilizing third party information on price and market conditions in the U.S. pharmaceutical market, the terms of the specific rebate programs, and the historical experience and trend analysis of actual rebate claims paid; (ii) testing rebate claims processed by the Company, including evaluating those claims for consistency with the contractual and mandated terms of the Company’s rebate arrangements; and (iii) comparing the independent estimates to management’s estimates.

Litigation Contingencies – Talc
As described in Notes 1 and 19 to the consolidated financial statements, the Company records accruals for loss contingencies associated with legal matters, including talc, when it is probable that a liability will be incurred and the amount of the loss can be reasonably estimated. To the extent adverse awards, judgments, or verdicts have been rendered against the Company, management does not record an accrual until a loss is determined to be probable and can be reasonably estimated. For these matters, management is unable to estimate the possible loss or range of loss beyond the amounts accrued. Amounts accrued for legal contingencies often result from a complex series of judgments about future events and uncertainties that rely heavily on estimates and assumptions including timing of related payments. The ability to make such estimates and judgments can be affected by various factors, including, among other things, whether damages sought in the proceedings are unsubstantiated or indeterminate; scientific and legal discovery has not commenced or is not complete; proceedings are in early stages; matters present legal uncertainties; there are significant facts in dispute; procedural or jurisdictional issues; the uncertainty and unpredictability of the number of potential claims; ability to achieve comprehensive multi-party settlements; complexity of related cross-claims and counterclaims; and/or there are numerous parties involved. Management continues to believe that the Company has strong legal grounds to contest the talc verdicts it has appealed. Notwithstanding management’s confidence in the safety of the Company’s talc products, in certain circumstances the Company has settled cases. In October 2021, Johnson & Johnson Consumer Inc. (Old JJCI), a wholly-owned subsidiary of Johnson & Johnson, implemented a corporate restructuring and created a subsidiary, LTL Management LLC (LTL), which became solely responsible for the talc-related liabilities, and another subsidiary, New JJCI, which became responsible for the remaining business of Old JJCI. LTL filed a voluntary petition, seeking relief under chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code. As a result of the LTL bankruptcy case, the Court entered a temporary restraining order staying all litigation against LTL and Old JJCI. On November 15, 2021, the North Carolina Bankruptcy Court confirmed the scope of the stay, issuing a Preliminary Injunction (PI) prohibiting and enjoining the commencement and prosecution of talc-related claims against LTL, Old JJCI, New JJCI, Johnson & Johnson, other of their corporate affiliates, identified retailers, insurance companies, and certain other parties. Claimants have filed a motion to dismiss the LTL bankruptcy case. The court commenced a hearing on February 14, 2022 regarding the motion to dismiss and on whether the PI should be extended. The Company has agreed to provide funding to LTL for the payment of amounts the Bankruptcy Court determines are owed by LTL through the establishment of a $2 billion trust in furtherance of this purpose. The Company has established a reserve for approximately $2 billion in connection with the aforementioned trust. The parties have not yet been able to reach a resolution of all matters related to talc, and while certain amounts under various scenarios have recently been referred to in testimony as part of the LTL bankruptcy proceedings, the Company is unable to estimate the possible loss or range of loss beyond the amount accrued.

104


The principal considerations for our determination that performing procedures relating to the talc litigation is a critical audit matter are the significant judgment by management when assessing the likelihood of a loss being incurred and when determining whether a reasonable estimate of the loss or range of loss for the future and existing talc claims can be made, which in turn led to a high degree of auditor judgment, subjectivity and effort in performing procedures and evaluating management’s assessment of the loss contingencies associated with this litigation.

Addressing the matter involved performing procedures and evaluating audit evidence in connection with forming our overall opinion on the consolidated financial statements. These procedures included testing the effectiveness of controls relating to management’s evaluation of the talc litigation, including controls over determining whether a loss is probable and whether the amount of loss can be reasonably estimated, as well as financial statement disclosures. These procedures also included, among others, (i) gaining an understanding of the Company’s process around the accounting and reporting for the talc litigation; (ii) discussing the status of significant known actual and potential litigation and the ongoing LTL bankruptcy proceedings with the Company’s in-house legal counsel, as well as external counsel when deemed necessary; (iii) obtaining and evaluating the letters of audit inquiry with internal and external legal counsel for significant litigation; (iv) evaluating the reasonableness of management’s assessment regarding whether an unfavorable outcome is reasonably possible or probable and reasonably estimable; and (v) evaluating the sufficiency of the Company’s litigation contingencies disclosures.

Litigation – Opioids
As described in Notes 1 and 19 to the consolidated financial statements, the Company records accruals for loss contingencies associated with legal matters, including opioids, when it is probable that a liability will be incurred and the amount of the loss can be reasonably estimated. To the extent adverse awards, judgments, or verdicts have been rendered against the Company, management does not record an accrual until a loss is determined to be probable and can be reasonably estimated. For these matters, management is unable to estimate the possible loss or range of loss beyond the amounts accrued. Amounts accrued for legal contingencies often result from a complex series of judgments about future events and uncertainties that rely heavily on estimates and assumptions including timing of related payments. The ability to make such estimates and judgments can be affected by various factors, including, among other things, whether damages sought in the proceedings are unsubstantiated or indeterminate; matters present legal uncertainties; there are significant facts in dispute; procedural or jurisdictional issues; the uncertainty and unpredictability of the number of potential claims; ability to achieve comprehensive multi-party settlements; complexity of related cross-claims and counterclaims; and/or there are numerous parties involved. The Company has been named in numerous lawsuits brought by certain state and local governments, including tribal governments, related to opioids matters. In October 2019, the Company announced a proposed agreement in principle that would include the Company paying $4 billion as settlement of the matters. In October 2020, the Company agreed to contribute up to an additional $1 billion to an all-in settlement amount that would resolve opioid lawsuits filed and future claims by states, cities, counties and tribal governments, for a total of $5 billion. In July 2021, the Company announced that the terms of the agreement to settle the state and subdivision claims have been finalized, depending upon the level of participation by the various parties. The terms provide a period of time for states to elect to participate in the agreement and, thereafter, a period for the subdivisions of the participating states to opt-in. The subdivision opt-in period expired in January 2022. The Company retains the right to opt-out of the agreement until late February 2022 if, in its sole discretion, there is insufficient participation.

The principal considerations for our determination that performing procedures relating to the opioids litigation is a critical audit matter are the significant judgment by management when determining whether a reasonable estimate of the range of loss for the agreement to settle the opioids litigation can be made, which in turn led to a high degree of auditor judgment, subjectivity and effort in performing procedures and evaluating management’s assessment of the loss contingencies associated with this litigation.

Addressing the matter involved performing procedures and evaluating audit evidence in connection with forming our overall opinion on the consolidated financial statements. These procedures included testing the effectiveness of controls relating to management’s evaluation of the opioid litigation, including controls over determining whether a loss is probable and whether the amount of loss can be reasonably estimated, as well as financial statement disclosures. These procedures also included, among others, (i) gaining an understanding of the Company’s process around the accounting and reporting for the opioids litigation; (ii) discussing the status of significant known actual and potential litigation and ongoing settlement negotiations with the Company’s in-house legal counsel, as well as external counsel when deemed necessary; (iii) obtaining and evaluating the letters of audit inquiry with internal and external legal counsel for significant litigation; (iv) evaluating the reasonableness of management’s assessment regarding whether an unfavorable outcome is reasonably possible or probable and reasonably estimable; and (v) evaluating the sufficiency of the Company’s litigation contingencies disclosures.

/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
Florham Park, New Jersey
February 17, 2022
We have served as the Company’s auditor since at least 1920. We have not been able to determine the specific year we began serving as auditor of the Company.
105


Management’s Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting

Under Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, management is required to assess the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting as of the end of each fiscal year and report, based on that assessment, whether the Company’s internal control over financial reporting is effective.
Management of the Company is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting. The Company’s internal control over financial reporting is designed to provide reasonable assurance as to the reliability of the Company’s financial reporting and the preparation of external financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles.
Internal controls over financial reporting, no matter how well designed, have inherent limitations. Therefore, internal control over financial reporting determined to be effective can provide only reasonable assurance with respect to financial statement preparation and may not prevent or detect all misstatements. Moreover, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.
The Company’s management has assessed the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting as of January 2, 2022. In making this assessment, the Company used the criteria established by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO) in “Internal Control-Integrated Framework (2013).” These criteria are in the areas of control environment, risk assessment, control activities, information and communication, and monitoring. The Company’s assessment included extensive documenting, evaluating and testing the design and operating effectiveness of its internal controls over financial reporting.
Based on the Company’s processes and assessment, as described above, management has concluded that, as of January 2, 2022, the Company’s internal control over financial reporting was effective.
The effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting as of January 2, 2022 has been audited by PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, an independent registered public accounting firm, as stated in their report, which appears herein.
/s/  J. Duato/s/ Joseph J. Wolk
Joaquin DuatoJoseph J. Wolk
DirectorExecutive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer
Chief Executive Officer

106


Shareholder Return Performance Graphs
Set forth below are line graphs comparing the cumulative total shareholder return on the Company’s Common Stock for periods of five years and ten years ending January 2, 2022, against the cumulative total return of the Standard & Poor’s 500 Stock Index, the Standard & Poor’s Pharmaceutical Index and the Standard & Poor’s Healthcare Equipment Index. The graphs and tables assume that $100 was invested on December 31, 2016 and December 31, 2011 in each of the Company’s Common Stock, the Standard & Poor’s 500 Stock Index, the Standard & Poor’s Pharmaceutical Index and the Standard & Poor’s Healthcare Equipment Index and that all dividends were reinvested.
5 Year Shareholder Return Performance J&J vs. Indices
jnj-20220102_g10.jpg
201620172018201920202021
Johnson & Johnson$100.00$124.40$118.02$137.15$152.03$169.43
S&P 500 Index$100.00$121.82$116.47$153.13$181.29$233.28
S&P Pharmaceutical Index$100.00$112.57$121.68$140.04$150.58$189.36
S&P Healthcare Equipment Index$100.00$130.90$152.15$196.77$231.46$276.26
10 Year Shareholder Return Performance J&J vs. Indices
jnj-20220102_g11.jpg
20112012201320142015201620172018201920202021
Johnson & Johnson$100.00$110.83$149.19$175.05$177.08$204.21$254.05$241.00$280.07$310.46$346.00
S&P 500 Index$100.00$115.99$153.55$174.55$176.95$198.10$241.33$230.73$303.35$359.13$462.13
S&P Pharmaceutical Index$100.00$114.43$154.74$189.12$200.06$196.93$221.69$239.63$275.78$296.54$372.90
S&P Healthcare Equipment Index$100.00$117.27$149.74$189.09$200.39$213.38$279.31$324.67$419.87$493.90$589.48

107


Item 9.CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE
    Not applicable.
Item 9A.CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES
    Disclosure Controls and Procedures.  At the end of the period covered by this Report, the Company evaluated the effectiveness of the design and operation of its disclosure controls and procedures. The Company’s disclosure controls and procedures are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed by the Company in the reports that it files or submits under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the SEC’s rules and forms. Disclosure controls and procedures include, without limitation, controls and procedures designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed by the Company in the reports that it files or submits under the Exchange Act is accumulated and communicated to the Company’s management, including its principal executive and principal financial officers, or persons performing similar functions, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure. Joaquin Duato, Chief Executive Officer, and Joseph J. Wolk, Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer, reviewed and participated in this evaluation. Based on this evaluation, Messrs. Duato and Wolk concluded that, as of the end of the period covered by this Report, the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures were effective.
    Reports on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting. The information called for by this item is incorporated herein by reference to “Management’s Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting”, and the attestation regarding internal controls over financial reporting included in the “Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm” included in Item 8 of this Report.
    Changes in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting.  During the fiscal quarter ended January 2, 2022, there were no changes in the Company’s internal control over financial reporting identified in connection with the evaluation required under Rules 13a-15 and 15d-15 under the Exchange Act that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, the Company’s internal control over financial reporting. The Company has not experienced any material impact to its internal controls over financial reporting despite the fact that many of its employees have worked remotely due to the COVID-19 pandemic. The Company proactively took actions to re-evaluate and refine its financial reporting process through additional monitoring controls to provide reasonable assurance that the financial results are reported accurately and timely. The Company continues to monitor and assess the effectiveness of the design and operation of its disclosure controls and procedures.
The Company is implementing a multi-year, enterprise-wide initiative to integrate, simplify and standardize processes and systems for the human resources, information technology, procurement, supply chain and finance functions. These are enhancements to support the growth of the Company’s financial shared service capabilities and standardize financial systems. This initiative is not in response to any identified deficiency or weakness in the Company’s internal control over financial reporting. In response to this initiative, the Company has and will continue to align and streamline the design and operation of its financial control environment.
Item 9B.OTHER INFORMATION
    Not applicable.

Item 9C. DISCLOSURE REGARDING FOREIGN JURISDICTIONS THAT PREVENT INSPECTIONS
Not applicable.
PART III
Item 10.DIRECTORS, EXECUTIVE OFFICERS AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE
    The information called for by this item is incorporated herein by reference to the discussion of the Audit Committee under the caption “Item 1. Election of Directors - Board Committees”; and the material under the captions “Item 1. Election of Directors” and, if applicable, “Stock Ownership and Section 16 Compliance – Delinquent Section 16(a) Reports” in the Proxy Statement; and the material under the caption “Executive Officers of the Registrant” in Part I of this Report.
    The Company’s Code of Business Conduct, which covers all employees (including the Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer and Controller), meets the requirements of the SEC rules promulgated under Section 406 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. The Code of Business Conduct is available on the Company’s website at www.jnj.com/code-of-business-conduct, and copies are available to shareholders without charge upon written request to the Secretary at the Company’s principal executive offices. Any substantive amendment to the Code of Business Conduct or any waiver of the Code granted to
108


the Chief Executive Officer, the Chief Financial Officer or the Controller will be posted on the Company’s website at www.investor.jnj.com/gov.cfm within five business days (and retained on the website for at least one year).
    In addition, the Company has adopted a Code of Business Conduct & Ethics for Members of the Board of Directors and Executive Officers. The Code of Business Conduct & Ethics for Members of the Board of Directors and Executive Officers is available on the Company’s website at www.investor.jnj.com/gov/boardconduct.cfm, and copies are available to shareholders without charge upon written request to the Secretary at the Company’s principal executive offices. Any substantive amendment to the Code or any waiver of the Code granted to any member of the Board of Directors or any executive officer will be posted on the Company’s website at www.investor.jnj.com/gov.cfm within five business days (and retained on the website for at least one year).
Item 11.EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
    The information called for by this item is incorporated herein by reference to the material under the captions “Item 1. Election of Directors – Director Compensation,” and “Item 2. Compensation & Benefits Committee Report,” “Compensation Discussion and Analysis” and “Executive Compensation Tables” in the Proxy Statement.
    The material incorporated herein by reference to the material under the caption “Compensation & Benefits Committee Report” in the Proxy Statement shall be deemed furnished, and not filed, in this Report and shall not be deemed incorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, as a result of this furnishing, except to the extent that the Company specifically incorporates it by reference.
Item 12.SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS
    The information called for by this item is incorporated herein by reference to the material under the caption “Item 1. Stock Ownership and Section 16 Compliance” in the Proxy Statement; and Note 16 “Common Stock, Stock Option Plans and Stock Compensation Agreements” of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements in Item 8 of this Report.
Equity Compensation Plan Information
    The following table provides certain information as of January 2, 2022 concerning the shares of the Company’s Common Stock that may be issued under existing equity compensation plans.
Plan CategoryNumber of Securities to
be Issued Upon Exercise of
Outstanding Options and Rights
Weighted Average
Exercise Price of
Outstanding Options and Rights
Number of Securities
Remaining Available for
Future Issuance Under Equity Compensation Plans(2)(3)
Equity Compensation Plans Approved by Security Holders(1)
133,794,708 $109.96 240,344,013 
Equity Compensation Plans Not Approved by Security Holders---
Total133,794,708 $109.96 240,344,013 

(1)Included in this category are the following equity compensation plans which have been approved by the Company’s shareholders: 2005 Long-Term Incentive Plan and 2012 Long-Term Incentive Plan.
(2)This column excludes shares reflected under the column “Number of Securities to be Issued Upon Exercise of Outstanding Options and Rights.”
(3)The 2005 Long-Term Incentive Plan expired April 26, 2012. All options and restricted shares granted subsequent to that date were under the 2012 Long-Term Incentive Plan.
Item 13.CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS, AND DIRECTOR INDEPENDENCE
    The information called for by this item is incorporated herein by reference to the material under the captions “Item 1. Election of Directors - Director Independence” and “Related Person Transactions” in the Proxy Statement.
Item 14.PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTANT FEES AND SERVICES
    The information called for by this item is incorporated herein by reference to the material under the caption “Item 3. Ratification of Appointment of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm” in the Proxy Statement.
109


PART IV
Item 15.EXHIBITS AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES
The following documents are filed as part of this report:
1.     Financial Statements
    Consolidated Balance Sheets at end of Fiscal Years 2021 and 2020
        Consolidated Statements of Earnings for Fiscal Years 2021, 2020 and 2019    
        Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income for Fiscal Years 2021, 2020 and 2019
        Consolidated Statements of Equity for Fiscal Years 2021, 2020 and 2019
        Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for Fiscal Years 2021, 2020 and 2019
        Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
All schedules are omitted because they are not applicable or the required information is included in the financial statements or notes.
2.     Exhibits Required to be Filed by Item 60l of Regulation S-K
The information called for by this item is incorporated herein by reference to the Exhibit Index in this Report.

Item 16. FORM 10-K SUMMARY
Registrants may voluntarily include a summary of information required by Form 10-K under this Item 16. The Company has elected not to include such summary information.


111110




SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this Report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
Date: February 18, 2020
17, 2022
JOHNSON & JOHNSON
(Registrant)

By /s/  A. GorskyJOHNSON & JOHNSON
(Registrant)
A. Gorsky, Chairman, Board of Directors,
By /s/  J. Duato
J. Duato, Director
and Chief Executive Officer

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.
SignatureTitleDate
/s/  J. DuatoDirectorFebruary 17, 2022
J. DuatoChief Executive Officer
(Principal Executive Officer)
/s/  J. J. WolkChief Financial OfficerFebruary 17, 2022
J. J. Wolk(Principal Financial Officer)
/s/  R. J. Decker Jr.Controller and Chief Accounting OfficerFebruary 17, 2022
R. J. Decker Jr.(Principal Accounting Officer)
SignatureTitleDate
/s/ A. GorskyExecutive Chairman, Board of DirectorsFebruary 18, 202017, 2022
A. Gorsky
Chief Executive Officer
(Principal Executive Officer)
/s/  J. J. WolkChief Financial OfficerFebruary 18, 2020
J. J. Wolk(Principal Financial Officer)
/s/  R. J. Decker Jr.Controller and Chief Accounting OfficerFebruary 18, 2020
R. J. Decker Jr.(Principal Accounting Officer)
/s/ M. C. BeckerleDirectorFebruary 18, 2020
M. C. Beckerle
/s/  D. S. DavisDirectorFebruary 18, 2020
D. S. Davis
/s/  I. E. L. DavisDirectorFebruary 18, 2020
I. E. L. Davis
/s/  J. A. DoudnaDirectorFebruary 18, 2020
J. A. Doudna

112



/s/ M. C. BeckerleDirectorFebruary 17, 2022
M. C. Beckerle
Signature/s/  D. S. DavisTitleDirectorDateFebruary 17, 2022
D. S. Davis
/s/  I. E. L. DavisDirectorFebruary 17, 2022
I. E. L. Davis
/s/  J. A. DoudnaDirectorFebruary 17, 2022
J. A. Doudna
111


SignatureTitleDate
/s/ M. A. HewsonDirectorFebruary 18, 202017, 2022
M. A. Hewson
/s/ H. JolyDirectorFebruary 18, 2020
H. Joly
/s/ M. B. McClellanDirectorFebruary 18, 2020
M. B. McClellan
/s/  A. M. MulcahyDirectorFebruary 18, 2020
A. M. Mulcahy
/s/  W. D. PerezDirectorFebruary 18, 2020
W. D. Perez
/s/  C. PrinceDirectorFebruary 18, 2020
C. Prince
/s/  A. E. WashingtonDirectorFebruary 18, 2020
A. E. Washington
/s/  M. A. WeinbergerDirectorFebruary 18, 2020
M. A. Weinberger
/s/  R. A. WilliamsDirectorFebruary 18, 2020
R. A. Williams


/s/ H. Joly113DirectorFebruary 17, 2022



EXHIBIT INDEX

H. Joly
Reg. S-K
Exhibit Table/s/ M. B. McClellanDescriptionDirectorFebruary 17, 2022
M. B. McClellan
/s/  A. M. MulcahyDirectorFebruary 17, 2022
A. M. Mulcahy
/s/  C. PrinceDirectorFebruary 17, 2022
C. Prince
/s/  A. E. WashingtonDirectorFebruary 17, 2022
A. E. Washington
/s/  M. A. WeinbergerDirectorFebruary 17, 2022
M. A. Weinberger
/s/ N.Y. WestDirectorFebruary 17, 2022
N. Y. West
/s/  R. A. WilliamsDirectorFebruary 17, 2022
R. A. Williams

112


EXHIBIT INDEX
Reg. S-K
Exhibit TableDescription
Item No.of Exhibit
Restated Certificate of Incorporation effective February 19, 2016 — Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 3(i) of the Registrant’s Form 10-K Annual Report for the fiscal year ended January 3, 2016.
By-LawsCertificate of Amendment to the Company, as amendedCertificate of Incorporation of Johnson & Johnson effective January 26, 2016April 30, 2020  — Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 3.1 of the Registrant's Form 8-K Current Report filed April 29, 2020.
By-Laws of the Company, as amended effective June 9, 2020 — Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 3.1 of the Registrant’s Form 8-K Current Report filed January 26, 2016.June 10, 2020.
4(a)Upon the request of the Securities and Exchange Commission, the Registrant will furnish a copy of all instruments defining the rights of holders of long-term debt of the Registrant.
Description of Securities Registered Pursuant to Section 12 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934  — Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 4.1 of the Registrant’s Form 8-K Current Report filed August 12, 2020.
2005 Long-Term Incentive Plan — Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 4 of the Registrant’s S-8 Registration Statement filed with the Commission on May 10, 2005 (file no. 333-124785).*
Form of Stock Option Certificate under the 2005 Long-Term Incentive Plan — Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.1 of the Registrant’s Form 8-K Current Report filed January 13, 2012.*
2012 Long-Term Incentive Plan — Incorporated herein by reference to Appendix A of the Registrant’s Proxy Statement filed with the Commission on March 15, 2017 .*2017.*
Form of Stock Option Certificate, Restricted Share Unit Certificate and Performance Share Unit Certificate under the 2012 Long-Term Incentive Plan — Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibits 10.2, 10.3 and 10.4 of the Registrant’s Form 10-Q Quarterly Report filed May 7,for the quarter ended April 1, 2012.*
Global NonQualified Stock Option Award Agreement, Global Restricted Share Unit Award Agreement and Global Performance Share Unit Award Agreement under the 2012 Long-Term Incentive Plan — Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibits 10.1, 10.2 and 10.3 of the Registrant’s Form 10-Q Quarterly Report filed Mayfor the quarter ended April 1, 2018.*
Johnson & Johnson Executive Incentive Plan (Amended as of November 28, 2018) — Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10(a) of the Registrant’s Form 10-Q Quarterly Report for filed May 1,the quarter ended March 31, 2019.*
Domestic Deferred Compensation (Certificate of Extra Compensation) Plan — Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10(g) of the Registrant’s Form 10-K Annual Report for the year ended December 28, 2003.*
Amendments to the Certificate of Extra Compensation Plan effective as of January 1, 2009 — Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10(j) of the Registrant’s Form 10-K Annual Report for the year ended December 28, 2008.*
2009 Certificates of Long-Term Performance Plan — Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.1 of the Registrant’s Form 10-Q Quarterly Report for the quarter ended September 27, 2009.*
Amended and Restated Deferred Fee Plan for Directors (Amended as of January 17, 2012) — Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10(k) of the Registrant's Form 10-K Annual Report for the fiscal year ended January 1, 2012.*
The Johnson & Johnson Executive Income Deferral Plan (AmendedAmended and Restated Effective January 1, 2010)2010 — Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.1 of the Registrant’s Form 10-Q Quarterly Report for the quarter ended September 30, 2012.*
Excess Savings Plan (Effective as of January 1, 1996) — Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10(j) of the Registrant’s Form 10-K Annual Report for the fiscal year ended December 29, 1996.*
Amendments to the Johnson & Johnson Excess Savings Plan effective as of January 1, 2009 — Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10(p) of the Registrant’s Form 10-K Annual Report for the fiscal year ended December 28, 2008.*
Amended and Restated Excess Benefit Plan (Supplemental Retirement Plan) — Incorporatedof Johnson & Johnson and Affiliated Companies (Amended and restated effective January 1, 2020, except as otherwise provided) incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10(h)10(n) of the Registrant’sRegistrant's Form 10-K Annual Report for the fiscal year ended January 3, 1993.*2021*
Amendments to the Excess Benefit Plan of Johnson & Johnson and Affiliated Companies effective as of January 1, 2009 — Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10(r) of the Registrant’s Form 10-K Annual Report for the fiscal year ended December 28, 2008.*
Amendment to the Excess Benefit Plan of Johnson & Johnson and Affiliated Companies, effective as of January 1, 2015 — Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10(q) of the Registrant’s Form 10-K Annual Report for the fiscal year ended December 28, 2014.*
10(q)**Executive Life Plan Agreement — Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10(i) of the Registrant’s Form 10-K Annual Report for the fiscal year ended January 3, 1993.*
Executive Life Plan Agreement Closure Letter — Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.1 of the Registrant’s Form 10-Q Quarterly Report for the quarter ended March 29, 2015.*
Employment Agreement for Dr. Paulus Stoffels - Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.2 of the Registrant’s Form 10-Q Quarterly Report for the quarter ended September 30, 2012.*

114113



Reg. S-K
Exhibit TableDescription
Item No.of Exhibit
Severance Pay Plan of Johnson & Johnson and U.S. Affiliated Companies, Amended and Restated as of October 1, 2014 — Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.1 of the Registrant's Form 10-Q Quarterly Report for the quarter ended September 28, 2014.*
First Amendment to the Severance Pay Plan of Johnson & Johnson and U.S. Affiliated Companies (as amended and restated effective October 1, 2014) — Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.1 of the Registrant's Form 10-Q Quarterly Report for the quarter ended June 28, 2015.*
Second Amendment to the Severance Pay Plan of Johnson & Johnson and U.S. Affiliated Companies (as amended and restated effective October 1, 2014) — Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10(x) of the Registrant's Form 10-K Annual Report for the fiscal year ended January 3, 2016.*
Subsidiaries - Filed with this document.
Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm — Filed with this document.
Certification of Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act — Filed with this document.
Certification of Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act — Filed with this document.
Certification of Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act — Furnished with this document.
Certification of Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act — Furnished with this document.
Exhibit 101:
EX-101.INSInstance Document - the instance document does not appear in the Interactive Data File because its XBRL tags are embedded within the Inline XBRL document
EX-101.SCHInline XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema
EX-101.CALInline XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase
EX-101.LABInline XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase
EX-101.PREInline XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase
EX-101.DEFInline XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Document
Exhibit 104:Cover Page Interactive Data File––the cover page interactive data file does not appear in the Interactive Data File because its XBRL tags are embedded within the Inline XBRL document.
*Management contract or compensatory plan.
**Paper filing.
A copy of any of the Exhibits listed above will be provided without charge to any shareholder submitting a written request specifying the desired exhibit(s) to the Secretary at the principal executive offices of the Company. Pursuant to Item 601(b)(4)(iii)(A) of Regulation S-K, the Company has not filed as exhibits to this Form 10-K certain long-term debt instruments, including indentures, under which the total amount of securities authorized does not exceed 10% of the total assets of the Company and its subsidiaries on a consolidated basis. The Company hereby agrees to furnish a copy of any such instrument to the SEC upon request.


115114