Table of Contents


UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
 
FORM 10-K
(Mark One)
xANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
 For the Fiscal Year Ended June 30, 20172019
OR
oTRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
 For the Transition Period from                      to                     
Commission File Number 000-09992
KLA-TENCORKLA CORPORATION
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
Delaware 04-2564110
(State or other jurisdiction of
incorporation or organization)
 
(I.R.S. Employer
Identification Number)
   
One Technology Drive, Milpitas, California 95035
(Address of Principal Executive Offices) (Zip Code)
Registrant’s Telephone Number, Including Area Code: (408) 875-3000
Securities Registered Pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:
Title of Each ClassTrading Symbol(s)Name of Each Exchange on Which Registered
Common Stock, $0.001 par value per shareKLACThe Nasdaq Stock Market, LLC
  The NASDAQ Global Select Market
 Securities Registered Pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act: 
 None 
 (Title of Class) 
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act.    Yes  x    No  o
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act.    Yes o    No  x
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.    Yes  x    No  o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate website, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).    Yes  x    No  o
Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K (§229.405 of this chapter) is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K.  xo
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, a smaller reporting company or an emerging growth company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer,” “smaller reporting company,” and "emerging“emerging growth company"company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.
Large accelerated filer x
   
Accelerated filer o 
Non-accelerated filer o 
 (Do not check if a smaller reporting company) 
Smaller reporting company o 
    
Emerging growth companyo 
If an emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with any new or revised financial accounting standards provided pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act. ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).    Yes  o    No  x
The aggregate market value of the voting and non-voting common stock held by non-affiliates of the registrant based upon the closing price of the registrant’s stock, as of December 31, 2016,2018, was approximately $11.05$13.53 billion.
The registrant had 156,840,420159,255,950 shares of common stock outstanding as of July 14, 2017.19, 2019.
DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE
Portions of the Proxy Statement for the 20172019 Annual Meeting of Stockholders (“Proxy Statement”), and to be filed pursuant to Regulation 14A within 120 days after the registrant’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2017,2019, are incorporated by reference into Part III of this report.


Table of Contents

INDEX 
   
    
PART I
    
Item 1.  
Item 1A.  
Item 1B.  
Item 2.  
Item 3.  
Item 4.  
    
PART II
    
Item 5.  
Item 6.  
Item 7.  
Item 7A.  
Item 8.  
   
   
  
   
   
   
   
Item 9.  
Item 9A.  
Item 9B.  
    
PART III
    
Item 10.  
Item 11.  
Item 12.  
Item 13.  
Item 14.  
    
PART IV
    
Item 15.  
   
   
   
Item 16. 

i

Table of Contents

SPECIAL NOTE REGARDING FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS
This report contains certain forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933 and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. All statements other than statements of historical fact may be forward-looking statements. You can identify these and other forward-looking statements by the use of words such as “may,” “will,” “could,” “would,” “should,” “expects,” “plans,” “anticipates,” “relies,” “believes,” “estimates,” “predicts,” “intends,” “potential,” “continue,” “thinks,” “seeks,” or the negative of such terms, or other comparable terminology. Forward-looking statements also include the assumptions underlying or relating to any of the foregoing statements. Such forward-looking statements include, among others, forecasts of the future results of our operations, including profitability; orders for our products and capital equipment generally; sales of semiconductors; the investments by our customers in advanced technologies and new materials; the allocation of capital spending by our customers (and, in particular, the percentage of spending that our customers allocate to process control); growth of revenue in the semiconductor industry, the semiconductor capital equipment industry and our business; technological trends in the semiconductor industry; future developments or trends in the global capital and financial markets; our future product offerings and product features; the success and market acceptance of new products; timing of shipment of backlog; our future product shipments and product and service revenues; our future gross margins; our future research and development expenses and selling, general and administrative expenses; our ability to successfully maintain cost discipline; international sales and operations; our ability to maintain or improve our existing competitive position; success of our product offerings; creation and funding of programs for research and development; attraction and retention of employees; results of our investment in leading edge technologies; the effects of hedging transactions; the effect of the sale of trade receivables and promissory notes from customers; our future effective income tax rate; our recognition of tax benefits; the effects of any audits or litigation; future payments of dividends to our stockholders; the completion of any acquisitions of third parties, or the technology or assets thereof; benefits received from any acquisitions and development of acquired technologies; sufficiency of our existing cash balance, investments, cash generated from operations and the unfunded portion of our revolving line of credit under a Credit Agreement (the “Credit Agreement”) to meet our operating and working capital requirements, including debt service and payment thereof; future dividends, and stock repurchases; our compliance with the financial covenants under the Credit Agreement; the expected timing of the completion of our global employee workforce reduction; the additional charges that we may incur in connection with our global employee workforce reduction; the expectedcost savings that we expect to recognize as a result of such workforce reduction; the adoption of new accounting pronouncements;pronouncements including ASC 606; the tax liabilities resulting from the enactment of the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act; and our repayment of our outstanding indebtedness.
Our actual results may differ significantly from those projected in the forward-looking statements in this report. Factors that might cause or contribute to such differences include, but are not limited to, those discussed in Item 1A, “Risk Factors” in this Annual Report on Form 10-K, as well as in Item 1, “Business” and Item 7, “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” in this report. You should carefully review these risks and also review the risks described in other documents we file from time to time with the Securities and Exchange Commission, including the Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q that we will file in the fiscal year ending June 30, 20182020. You are cautioned not to place undue reliance on these forward-looking statements, and we expressly assume no obligation and do not intend to update the forward-looking statements in this report after the date hereof.
 
 

ii

Table of Contents

PART I

ITEM 1.BUSINESS
The Company
KLA-TencorKLA Corporation (“KLA-Tencor”KLA” or the “Company” and also referred to as “we” or “our”) is a leading supplier of process equipment, process control equipment, and data analytics products for a broad range of industries, including semiconductors, printed circuit boards and displays. We provide advanced process control and yield managementprocess-enabling solutions for the semiconductormanufacturing and related nanoelectronics industries. Our products are also used in a number of other high technology industries, including the advancedtesting wafers and reticles, integrated circuits (“IC” or “chip”), packaging, light emitting diode (“LED”),diodes, power devices, compound semiconductor anddevices, microelectromechanical systems, data storage, industries,printed circuit boards and flat and flexible panel displays, as well as general materials research.
On February 20, 2019, we completed the acquisition of Orbotech, Ltd. (“Orbotech”) for a total purchase consideration of approximately $3.26 billion. For additional details, refer to Note 6 “Business Combinations” to our Consolidated Financial Statements. Orbotech’s core business enables electronic device manufacturers to inspect, test and measure printed circuit boards and flat panel displays to verify their quality; pattern electronic circuitry on substrate and perform three-dimensional shaping of metalized circuits on multiple surfaces; and utilize advanced vacuum deposition and etching process in semiconductor device and semiconductor manufacturing and to perform laser drilling of electronic substrates.
Subsequent to the acquisition of Orbotech, we changed our organizational structure, resulting in four reportable segments: Semiconductor Process Control; Specialty Semiconductor Process; PCB, Display and Component Inspection; and Other.
Within our primary area of focus,the Semiconductor Process Control segment, our comprehensive portfolio of inspection, metrology and metrologydata analytics products, and related service software and other offerings, helps integrated circuit (“IC” or “chip”) manufacturers manageachieve target yield throughout the entire semiconductor fabrication process—from research and development (“R&D”) to final volume production. TheseOur differentiated products and offeringsservices are designed to provide comprehensive solutions tothat help our customers to accelerate their development and production ramp cycles, to achieve higher and more stable semiconductor die yields and to improve their overall profitability.
KLA-Tencor’s productsIn the Specialty Semiconductor Process segment, we develop and servicessell advanced vacuum deposition and etching process tools, which are used by a broad range of specialty semiconductor customers, including manufacturers of microelectromechanical systems (“MEMS”), radio frequency (“RF”) communication chips, and power semiconductors for automotive and industrial applications.
In the vast majority of bare wafer, IC, lithography reticlePCB, Display and Component Inspection segment, we enable electronic device manufacturers to inspect, test and measure printed circuit boards (“reticle” or “mask”PCBs”) and disk manufacturers aroundflat panel displays (“FPDs”) and ICs to verify their quality, pattern the world. These customers turn to us for inline waferdesired electronic circuitry on the relevant substrate and IC defect monitoring, review and classification; reticle defect inspection and metrology; packaging and interconnect inspection; critical dimension (“CD”) metrology; pattern overlay metrology; film thickness, surface topography and composition measurements; measurementperform three-dimensional shaping of in-chamber process conditions, wafer shape and stress metrology; computational lithography tools; and overall yield and fab-wide data management and analysis systems. metalized circuits on multiple surfaces.
Our advanced products, coupled with our unique yield management services, allow us to deliver the solutions our semiconductor, printed circuit board and display customers need to accelerateachieve their yield learning rates andproductivity goals, by significantly reducereducing their risks and costs.
Certain industry and technical terms used in this section are defined in the subsection entitled “Glossary” found at the end of this Item 1.
KLA-TencorKLA (then KLA-Tencor) was formed in April 1997 through the merger of KLA Instruments Corporation and Tencor Instruments, two long-time leaders in the semiconductor equipment industry that originally began operations in 1975 and 1976, respectively.
Additional information about KLA-TencorKLA is available on our website at www.kla-tencor.com.www.kla.com. Our Annual Report on Form 10-K, our Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q, Current Reports on Form 8-K and amendments to those reports filed or furnished pursuant to Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, are available free of charge on our website as soon as reasonably practicable after we electronically file them with or furnish them to the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC��SEC”). Information contained on our website is not part of this Annual Report on Form 10-K or our other filings with the SEC. Additionally, these filings may be obtained through the SEC’s website (www.sec.gov), which contains reports, proxy and information statements, and other information regarding issuers that file electronically. Documents that are not available through the SEC’s website may also be obtained by mailing a request to the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission, Office of FOIA/PA Operations, 100 F Street, NE, Washington, DC 20549-2736, by submitting an online request to the SEC at www.sec.gov or by calling the SEC at 1-800-732-0330.

Investors and others should note that we announce material financial information to our investors using our investor relations web site (ir.kla-tencor.comir.kla.com), SEC filings, press releases, public conference calls and webcasts. We use these channels as well as social media to communicate with the public about our company, our products and services and other matters. It is possible that the information we post on social media could be deemed to be material information. Therefore, we encourage investors, the media, and others interested in our company to review the information we post on the social media channels listed on our investor relations web site.website.
Terminated Merger with Lam Research
On October 20, 2015, we entered into an Agreement and Plan of Merger and Reorganization (the “Merger Agreement” or “Merger”) with Lam Research Corporation (“Lam Research”) which was subject to regulatory approvals. On October 5, 2016, we mutually agreed to terminate the Merger Agreement and no termination fees were payable by either party in connection with the termination.

Industry
General Background
KLA-Tencor’sKLA’s core focus is the semiconductor industry. The semiconductor fabrication process begins with a bare silicon wafer—a round disk that is typically 150 millimeters, 200 millimeters or 300 millimeters in diameter, about as thick as a credit card and gray in color. The process of manufacturing wafers is in itself highly sophisticated, involving the creation of large ingots of silicon by pulling them out of a vat of molten silicon. The ingots are then sliced into wafers. Prime silicon wafers are then polished to a mirror finish. Other, more specialized wafers, such as epitaxial silicon (“epi”), silicon-on-insulatorsilicon on insulator (“SOI”), gallium nitride (“GaN”) and silicon carbide (“SiC”), are also common in the semiconductor industry.
The manufacturing cycle of an IC is grouped into three phases: design, fabrication and testing. IC design involves the architectural layout of the circuit, as well as design verification and reticle generation. The fabrication of a chip is accomplished by depositing a series of film layers that act as conductors, semiconductors or insulators on bare wafers. The deposition of these film layers is interspersed with numerous other process steps that create circuit patterns, remove portions of the film layers, and perform other functions such as heat treatment, measurement and inspection. Most advanced chip designs require hundreds of individual steps, many of which are performed multiple times. Most chips consist of two main structures: the lower structure, typically consisting of transistors or capacitors which perform the “smart” functions of the chip; and the upper “interconnect” structure, typically consisting of circuitry which connects the components in the lower structure. When all of the layers on the wafer have been fabricated, each chip on the wafer is tested for functionality. The wafer is then cut into individual chips, and thosethe chips that passedpass functional testing are packaged. Final testing is performed on all packaged chips.
Current Trends Packaged chips are mounted onto printed circuit boards (“PCBs”) for connection to the outside world. Additionally, flat panel displays are manufactured using processes similar to ICs (e.g., film deposition, photolithography, etching) except using glass as the starting substrate.
The semiconductor equipment industry is currently experiencing growth from multiple drivers, such as demand for chips providing computationcomputational power and connectivity for Artificial Intelligence (“AI”) applications and supportcontinued need for mobile devices at thechips from leading edge of foundry and logic chip manufacturing.manufacturers that support mobile devices. Qualification of early EUVextreme ultraviolet (“EUV”) lithography processes and equipment is driving growth at leading logic/foundry and dynamic random-access memory (“DRAM”) manufacturers. Expansion of the Internet of Things (“IoT”) together with the increasing acceptanceadoption of advanced driver assistance systems (“ADAS”) in anticipation ofelectrical vehicles and the introduction of autonomous cars have begun to accelerate legacy-nodeneed for automobile connectivity are accelerating trailing-edge node technology conversions and capacity expansions. Intertwined in these areas, spurred by data storage and connectivity needs, is the growth in demand for memory chips. Finally, China is emerging as a major region for manufacturing of logic and memory chips, adding to its role as the world’s largest consumer of ICs. Government initiatives are propelling China to expand its domestic manufacturing capacity and attracting semiconductor manufacturers from Taiwan, Korea, Japan and the US. China is currently seen as an important long-term growth region for the semiconductor capital equipment sector.
Supporting this multi-segmented market growth, the semiconductor industry continues to introduce numerous technology changes. New techniques and architectures in production today include three-dimensionalthree dimensional finFET transistors, three-dimensionaltransistors; three dimensional flash memory (“3D NAND”); design technology co-optimization (“DTCO”); advanced patterning lithography,technologies, including self-aligned multiple patterning and extreme ultraviolet (“EUV”)EUV lithography; and advanced wafer-level packaging. KLA-Tencor’spackaging methods. KLA’s inspection, metrology and measurementdata analytics technologies play key roles in enabling our customers to develop and manufacture advanced semiconductor devices to support these trends.
Companies that anticipate future market demands by developing and refining new technologies and manufacturing processes are better positioned to lead in the semiconductor market. Accelerating the yield ramp and maximizing production yields of high-performance devices are key goals of modern semiconductor manufacturing. Ramping to high-volumehigh volume production ahead of competitors can dramatically increase the revenue an IC manufacturer realizes for a given product. During past industry cycles, semiconductor manufacturers generally contended with a few key new technologies or market trends, such as a specific design rule shrink. In today’s market, driven by consumer demand for low-cost electronic goods, theToday, leading semiconductor manufacturers are investing in simultaneous production integration of multiple new process technologies, some requiring new substrate and film materials, new geometries, advanced multiple-patterningmulti-patterning and EUV lithography and advanced packaging techniques. While many of these technologies have been adopted at the development and pilot production stages of chip manufacturing, significant challenges and risks associated with each technology have affected the adoption of these technologies into full-volumefull volume production. For example, as design rules decrease,

yields become more sensitive to the size and density of defects, and device performance characteristics (namely speed, capacity or power management) become more sensitive to parameters such as line widthlinewidth and film thickness variation. New process materials, such as photoresists for EUV lithography-capable photoresists,lithography, require extensive characterization before they can be used in the manufacturing process. Moving several of these advanced technologies into production at once only adds to the risks that chipmakers face.

The continuing evolution of semiconductor devices to smaller geometries and more complex multi-level circuitry has significantly increased the performance and cost requirements of the capital equipment used to manufacture these devices. Construction of an advanced wafer fabrication facility today can cost overwell above $5.00 billion, substantially more than previous-generation facilities. In addition, chipmakers are demanding increased productivity and higher returns from their manufacturing equipment and are also seeking ways to extend the performance of their existing equipment.
By developing new process control and yield management tools that help chipmakers accelerate the adoption of these new technologies into volume production, we enable our customers to better leverage these increasingly expensive facilities and improve their return on investment (“ROI”). Once customers’ production lines are operating at high volume, our toolssystems help ensure that yields are stable and process excursions are identified for quick resolution. In addition, the move to each new generation’s smaller design rules, coupled with new materials and device innovation, has increased in-process variability, which requires an increase in inspection and metrology sampling.
KLA-TencorKLA systems not only analyze defectivity and metrology issues at critical points in the wafer, reticle and IC manufacturing processes, but also provide information to our customers so that they can identify and address the underlying process problems. The ability to locate the source of defects and resolve the underlying process issues enables our customers to improve control over their manufacturing processes. This helps them increase their yield of high-performance parts and deliver their products to market faster—thus maximizing their profits. With our broad portfolio of application-focused technologies and our dedicated yield technology expertise, we are in position to be a key supplier of comprehensive yield management solutions for customers’ next-generation products, helping our customers respond to the challenges posed by shrinking device sizes, the transition to new production materials, new device and circuit architectures, more demanding lithography processes, and new back-end packaging techniques.
Products
KLA-Tencor is engaged primarilyWith the Orbotech acquisition, KLA has expanded its presence in the design, manufacturesemiconductor capital equipment market, leveraging products and marketingtechnologies of process controlOrbotech’s SPTS semiconductor processing business. SPTS develops and yield managementsells differentiated custom deposition and etching solutions for fast-growing markets, such as power and analog devices, RF communication chips and MEMS. These devices, which are often built on non-traditional substrates, like SiC and GaN, have become critical to accelerating some of the semiconductorsecular trends in automotive, industrial and related nanoelectronics industriescommunication industries. Infrastructure build-out for 5G is creating demand for RF components; new SiC and providesGaN based power devices are moving into volume production for electric vehicles; and high-density packaging is growing to support AI.
The acquisition of Orbotech has also allowed KLA to enter the PCB fabrication market, providing a comprehensive portfolio of tools, services and solutions to accelerate technology transitions and production ramp. Our portfolio includes inline inspection tools to monitor the quality of printed circuit board fabrication, equipment to repair defective boards, digital imaging technologies to print fine geometry according to the design, and computer aided manufacturing (“CAM”) software. Growth in the PCB business is driven mainly by investments in 5G technology and its supporting applications: smartphones, smart vehicles, AI and cloud servers/high performance computing. These applications will be based on several technological segments including flexible printed circuits (“FPCs”), high density interconnect (“HDI”), PCBs, and IC substrates.
The acquisition of Orbotech has also allowed KLA to enter the flat panel display market, providing complete yield management solutions, including automated optical inspection systems, repair technologies and electrical testers. An accelerated transition to organic light emitting diode (“OLED”) displays to serve the mobile market, introduction of OLED technology for large size TVs, and a steep ramp in liquid crystal display (“LCD”) production for televisions in China are driving the flat panel display business. New technologies, such as microLED, also represent a growth opportunity for KLA in the display market.
Products
KLA develops industry-leading equipment and services that enable innovation throughout the electronics industry. We provide advanced process control and process-enabling solutions for manufacturing wafers, reticles, integrated circuits, packaging, printed circuit boards, and flat and flexible panel displays.

KLA’s inspection, metrology products, and related service, software and other offerings.
KLA-Tencor’s inspection and metrologydata analytics products and related offerings can be broadly categorized as supporting customers in the following groups: Chip Manufacturing;and Wafer Manufacturing; Reticle Manufacturing; Advanced Packaging; LED, Power Device,Packaging Manufacturing; Compound Semiconductor Manufacturing and Microelectromechanical Systems (“MEMS”) Manufacturing; Data Storage Media/HeadHard Disk Drive Manufacturing; and General Purpose/Lab Applications. TheOrbotech’s inspection, repair, imaging, laser drilling, electrical testing and wafer processing equipment support customers in Printed Circuit Board Manufacturing, Flexible and Flat Panel Display Manufacturing, Advanced Packaging Manufacturing, and manufacturing of semiconductor devices such as MEMS, LEDs, high speed RF IC devices and power semiconductors. Some of the company’s more significant of these products are described below and also included in the broader product table at the end of this “Products” section.
For customers manufacturing legacy design-rule devices, our K-T Pro division provides refurbished KLA-Tencor tools as part of our K-T Certified program; remanufactured trailing edge systems; and enhancements and upgrades for last-generation KLA-Tencor tools.Semiconductor Process Control:
Chip and Wafer Manufacturing
KLA-Tencor’sKLA’s comprehensive portfolio of defect inspection, review, metrology, patterning simulation, in situ process monitoring and metrologydata analytics products, and related service, software and other offerings, helps substrate and chip manufacturers manage yield throughout the entire semiconductorwafer and chip fabrication process—processes, from research and development to final volume production. These products and offerings are designed to provide comprehensive solutions to help our customers to accelerate their development and production ramp cycles, to achieve higher and more stable semiconductor die yields, and to improve their overall profitability.
Front-End Defect Inspection and Review
KLA-Tencor’s front-endKLA’s wafer defect inspection toolsand review systems cover a broad range of yield applications within thefor IC manufacturing environment, including:and substrate manufacturers, including research and development; incomingdevelopment, wafer qualification;qualification, reticle qualification;qualification, and tool, process and line monitoring. Patterned and unpatterned wafer inspectors find particles, pattern defects and electrical issues on the front surface, back surface and edge of the wafer, allowing engineers to detect and monitor critical yield excursions. Our defect review systems capture high resolution images of the defects detected by inspection tools, helping substrate manufacturers and chipmakers identify and resolve yield issues. Fabs rely on our high sensitivity reticle inspection systems to identify defects on reticles at an early stage and to prevent reticle defects from printing on production wafers. The defect data generated by our inspectors is compiled and reduced to relevant root-cause and yield-analysis information with our suite of data management tools. By implementing our front-end defect inspection and analysisreview systems, chipmakers and substrate manufacturers are able to take quick corrective action, resulting in faster yield improvement and better time to market.

In August 2016, we launched the Teron SL655 reticle inspection system, which enables IC manufacturers to assess incoming reticle quality, monitor reticle degradation and detect yield-critical reticle defects. The Teron SL655 introduces new STARlightGold technology, which provides a golden reference to maximize detection of defects critical to the mask requalification process.
The launch of the Teron SL655 further strengthened our broad range of offerings that support the front-end defect inspection market. In the field ofFor patterned wafer optical inspection, we offerprovide our 3920 Series, 3900 Series, (for high2950 Series, 2930 Series, 2920 Series, 2910 Series and 2900 Series (high resolution broadband plasma defect inspection)inspection for defect discovery, yield learning and inline monitoring across all advanced node layers); our 2930 Series and 2920 Series (for broadband plasmathe Voyager 1015 (laser scanning patterned wafer inspection system that provides enhanced defect inspection)capture for high throughput lithography cell monitoring); ourthe Puma 9980 Series, Puma 9850 Series and Puma 9650 Series (for laser(laser scanning defect inspection); our 8 Series systems (for high(high productivity defect inspection); and our CIRCL cluster tool (for defect(defect inspection, review and metrology of all wafer surfaces - front side, edge and back side)backside).
In the field of unpatterned wafer and surface inspection, the Surfscan SP7 unpatterned wafer defect inspection system provides high sensitivity on bare wafers, smooth films and rough films, supporting development and production of advanced substrates, processes and devices at wafer shops, original equipment manufacturers (“OEMs”) and IC fabs. In addition, we offer the Surfscan SP5 Series and Surfscan SP3 Series (wafer defect inspection systems for process tool qualification and monitoring using blanket films and bare wafers); and the SURFmonitor, (integrated on the Surfscan SP5 and Surfscan SP3 Series), which enables surface quality measurements and capture of low-contrast defects. For wafer manufacturers, these specialized inspection systems assess surface quality and detect, count and bin defects during the development and production monitoring of polished wafers, epi wafers and engineered substrates, and as a critical part of outgoing inspection. For chip manufacturers, the Surfscan systems qualify incoming bare wafers, and qualify and monitor processes during all manufacturing stages – from development through production.
Our eDR7380 high performance electron-beam (e-beam) wafer defect review and classification system produces a comprehensive defect pareto in one test for accurate defect sourcing and faster excursion detection during production. Unique synergy with our inspectors facilitates accurate identification and classification of patterned wafer, bare wafer and bevel edge defects for faster yield learning during IC and wafer manufacturing.
For in-fab reticle inspection,qualification, we offer our X5.3 andthe Teron SL650 Series products, which are photomaskand X5.3 reticle inspection systems thatsystems. These inspectors allow IC fabs to qualify incoming reticles and inspect production reticles for contaminants and other process-related changes. In addition, we offerThe Teron SL655 reticle inspection system enables IC manufacturers to assess incoming reticle quality, monitor reticle degradation and detect yield-critical reticle defects. The Teron SL655 introduced STARlightGold technology, which provides a numbergolden reference to maximize detection of other products fordefects critical to the front-end defect inspection market, as reflected in the product table at the conclusion of this “Products” section.mask requalification process.
Defect Review
KLA-Tencor’s defect review systems capture high resolution images of the defects detected by inspection tools. These images enable defect classification, helping chipmakers identify and resolve yield issues. KLA-Tencor’s suite of defect inspectors, defect review and classification tools and data management systems form a broad solution for finding, identifying and tracking yield-critical defects and process issues. The eDR7280, an electron-beam wafer defect review and classification system, utilizes improved imaging and automatic defect classification capability to identify detected defects and produce an accurate representation of the detected defect population.
Metrology
KLA-Tencor’sKLA’s array of metrology solutions addresses IC and substrate manufacturing, as well as scientific research and other applications. Precise metrology and control of pattern dimensions, film thicknesses, layer-to-layer alignment, pattern placement, surface topography, electro-optical and electro-opticalelectromagnetic properties are important in many industries as critical dimensions narrow, film thicknesses shrink to countable numbers of atomic layers and devices become more complex.
Our 5D Patterning Control Solution addresses five elements of patterning process control--the three geometrical dimensions of device structures, time-to-results and overall equipment efficiency--and supports advanced patterning technologies through the characterization, optimization and monitoring of fab-wide processes. In February 2017, we launched several metrology products that are key components in our 5D Patterning Control Solutionand help accelerate the ramp of innovative patterning techniques for advanced design node devices:
Overlay Metrology
To help achieve sub-3nm overlay error for advanced logic and memory devices we introduced the Archer 600 imaging-based overlay metrology system. New optics in combination with innovative ProAIM targets deliver better resilience to process variations and improved correlation between measurement target and actual device pattern overlay errors, producing more accurate overlay measurements.
Patterned Wafer Geometry Metrology
The WaferSight PWG2 system was introduced to measure comprehensive wafer stress and shape uniformity data with significant productivity improvements. The WaferSight PWG2 system enables faster process ramp, overlay control, lithography focus window control and in-line process monitoring for processes such as thin films, etch, CMP and rapid thermal processing (“RTP”).
Optical CD and Shape Metrology
The SpectraShape 10K optical-based metrology system was introduced to measure the CDs and three-dimensional shapes of complex IC device structures following etch, chemical mechanical planarization (CMP) and other process steps. Several new optical technologies including a new high brightness light source illumination enable accurate measurements of critical parameters in FinFET and 3D NAND devices.

The products that we launched during the fiscal year ended June 30, 2017 further strengthened our broad range of offerings that support the metrology market. The Archer Series of imaging-based overlay metrology tools enablessystems enable characterization of overlay error on lithography process layers for advanced patterning technologies. The ATL Series of scatterometry-based overlay metrology systems utilize tunable laser technology to automatically maintain highly accurate and robust overlay error measurements in the presence of process variations, supporting fast technology ramps and wafer disposition during production.
The SpectraShape family of optical CD and shape metrology systems characterizescharacterize and monitorsmonitor the critical dimensions and 3D shapes of geometrically complex features incorporated by some IC manufacturers ininto their latest generation devices. The SpectraShape 10K metrology system measures the CDs and three-dimensional shapes of finFET, 3D NAND and other complex IC device structures following etch, chemical mechanical planarization (“CMP”) and other process steps.
The SpectraFilm and Aleris families of film metrology toolssystems provide precise measurement of film thickness, refractive index, stress and composition for a broad range of film layers. The WaferSight PWGSpectraFilm F1 film metrology system, measuresemploys optical technologies that determine single- and multi-layer film thicknesses and uniformity with high precision to monitor deposition processes in production, and deliver bandgap data that predict device electrical performance earlier than end of line test.
The PWG3 patterned wafer geometry aftermetrology system measures stress-induced wafer shape, wafer shape-induced pattern overlay errors, wafer thickness variations and wafer front side and backside topography for a wide range of IC processes. This data is used for inline monitoring of fab processes, helping identifyoverlay corrections and monitor variations that can affect patterning. Finally, 5D Analyzerscanner focus control, enabling improved patterning and faster yield ramp. Our WaferSight bare wafer geometry metrology systems are used by substrate manufacturers to qualify polished and epitaxial silicon wafers, and engineered and other advanced substrates.
Magnetic random-access memory (“MRAM”) manufacturing requires the control of deposition, annealing, magnetization and etch of very thin ferromagnetic layers. These memory cells are embedded into the logic chip when the chip is getting close to completion. At this late stage, the value of the chip is high so the MRAM cell must be carefully controlled to maintain high yield. KLA offers advanced, run-time data analysisseveral systems for a wide rangemanufacturing control of metrology system types. MRAM processes, including the CAPRES CIPTech and microHall series, and the MicroSense PKMRAM and KerrMapper systems.
In addition, we offer a number of other products for the metrology market, as reflected in the product table at the conclusion of this “Products” section.
In-SituSitu Process Monitoring
KLA-Tencor’sKLA’s SensArray sensor waferssystems are a portfolio of advanced wireless and wired wafers and reticles that enable in situ monitoring of the production process environment. These sensor wafers and reticles provide insight into critical process parameters, such as thermal uniformity, profile temperature monitoring wafers that captureand light intensity, under real production conditions. For example, the EtchTempin situ wafer temperature measurement systems measure the effect of the plasma etch process environment on production wafers. These sensor wafers provide insight intoBy characterizing thermal uniformity and profile temperature under real production conditions. In February 2017 we introducedconditions that closely represent product wafer conditions, the SensArray HighTemp 4mmEtchTemp SE wireless wafer whichassists process engineers with tuning of the etch process conditions and the qualification, matching and post-PM verification of front end of line plasma etch chambers. The AMW product (Automation Metrology Wafer) enables fab-wide automated wafer handling monitoring. The SensArray Automation package provides temporal and spatial temperature information for advanced films processes. With a thinner wafer profile than its predecessor,fast automated collection of parametric measurement within the SensArray HighTemp 4mm is compatible with a wider range of process tool types, including track, strip and physical vapor deposition (“PVD”) systems.chamber. SensArray products are used infor many semiconductor and flat panel display fabrication processes, including lithography, etch and deposition.deposition, and for reticle manufacturing, including e-beam mask writer qualification and process monitoring.
Lithography SoftwarePatterning Simulation
KLA-Tencor’sKLA’s PROLITH product line providescomputational lithography software is used by researchers at advanced IC manufacturers, lithography hardware suppliers, track companies and material providers with virtual lithography software to explore critical-featurecritical feature designs, manufacturability and process-limited yield of proposed lithographic and patterning technologies without the time and expense of printing hundreds of test wafers using experimental materials and prototype process equipment. OurProDATA process window analysis software tool provides analysis of experimental

Data Analytics
The data including CD, roughness, sidewall angle, top loss and pattern collapse.
In December 2016 we introduced PROLITH X6.0, which includes new modeling features and productivity improvements to support key lithography segments such as EUV, 193nm immersion, multiple patterning and thick resist lithography for 3D interconnects and MEMS manufacturing.
Wafer Manufacturing
KLA-Tencor’s portfolio of products focused on the demands of wafer manufacturers includesgenerated by our inspection, metrology and in situ process monitoring systems are compiled and reduced to relevant root cause and yield analysis information with our suite of data analytics and management tools.
Our 5D Analyzer advanced data analysis and patterning control system offers an extendible, open architecture that accepts data from a wide range of metrology and process tools to enable advanced analysis, characterization and real-time control of fab-wide process variations. Our Klarity automated defect and yield analysis systems help IC manufacturers reduce defect inspection, classification and review data to relevant root-cause and yield-analysis information. Our RDC reticle data analysis and management system provides data used for in-fab reticle qualification. Our FabVision data management systems. Specialized inspection tools assess surface quality and detect, count and bin defects during the wafer manufacturing process and as a critical part of outgoing inspection. Wafer geometry tools ensure that the wafer is extremely flat and uniform in thickness, with precisely controlled surface topography. Specifications for wafer defectivity, geometry and surface quality are tightening as the dimensions of transistors become so small that the geometry of the substrate can substantially affect transistor performance.
Our unpatterned wafer inspection portfolio is comprised of the Surfscan SP5, the Surfscan SP5XPand the Surfscan SP3 Series. These unpatterned wafer inspection systems are designed to enable development and production monitoring of polished wafers, epi wafers and engineered substrates. The integrated SURFmonitor module characterizes wafer surface quality and captures low-contrast defects. The WaferSight Series offers bare wafer geometry and nanotopography metrology capabilities. FabVisionsystem offers fab-wide data management and automated yield analysis for wafer manufacturers.
Reticle Manufacturing
Error-free reticles, or masks, are necessary to achievingachieve high semiconductor device yields, since reticle defects can be replicated in every die on production wafers. KLA-TencorKLA offers high sensitivity reticle inspection, metrology and metrologydata analytics systems for mask shops, designedblank manufacturers and reticle manufacturers (“mask shops”) to help them manufacture reticle blanks and patterned reticles that are free of pattern defects that could print on the wafers and meet pattern placement and critical dimension uniformity specifications. In August 2016 we launched
The FlashScan reticle blank inspection product line is used by blank manufacturers for defect control during process development and volume manufacturing, and by mask shops for incoming inspection, tool monitoring and process control.
The Teron 640e reticle inspection system incorporates advanced optical, detector and algorithm technologies that detect critical pattern and particle defects at high throughput, advancing the Teron 640development and RDC systems to support the abilityqualification of EUV and optical patterned reticles in leading-edge mask shops to accurately qualify advanced optical masks. The Teron 640 inspection system utilizes 193nm illumination with Dual Imaging mode to provide the sensitivity required for high-performance reticle quality control. RDC is a comprehensive data analysis and storage platform that supports multiple KLA-Tencor reticle inspection and metrology platforms for mask shops and IC fabs.

shops. Our reticle inspection portfolio also includes the Teron 600 Series for development and manufacturing of advanced optical and EUV masks, the TeraScan 500XR system for production of reticles for the 32nm node and above, and our X5.3 and Teron SL650 Series products for reticle quality control at IC fabs. These products include the capability for mapping critical dimension uniformity across the reticle.
In addition, we offer the LMS IPRO lineSeries of reticle registration metrology systems for measuring mask pattern placement error, including the LMS IPRO6, which measures on-device pattern features in addition to standard registration marks.error. If the pattern on the reticle is displaced from its intended location, overlay error can result on the wafer, which can lead to electrical continuity issues affecting yield, performance or reliability of the IC device. The LMS IPRO7 reticle registration metrology system accurately measures on-device reticle pattern placement error with fast cycle time, enabling comprehensive reticle qualification for e-beam mask writer corrections and reduction of reticle-related contributions to device overlay errors in the IC fab.
Advanced RDC is a comprehensive data analysis and storage platform that supports multiple KLA reticle inspection and metrology platforms for mask shops and IC fabs.
Packaging Manufacturing
KLA-TencorKLA offers standalone and cluster inspection and metrology systems for various applications in the field of advanced semiconductor packaging.
Wafer-Level Packaging Inspection/Metrology
For wafer-level packaging (i.e., atinspection, the middle and back-end of the semiconductor manufacturing process). Our CIRCL-AP all-surface and 89xx-AP front side wafer inspection, metrology and review systems supportKronos system provides high sensitivity to critical defects for advanced wafer-level packaging production monitoring for processes such as 2.5D/3D IC integration using through silicon vias (“TSVs”), wafer-level chip scale packaging (“WLCSP”) and fan-out wafer-level packaging (“FOWLP”). We also offer our CIRCL-AP cluster tool, which features multiple modules to support all-surface wafer-level packaging inspection, metrology and review. Used for packaging applications associated with LEDs, MEMS, image sensors and flip-chip packaging, our WI-22xx SeriesWI-2280 products focus on front side wafer inspection and provide feedback on wafer surface quality, quality of the wafer dicing, or quality of wafer bumps, pads, pillars and interconnects. Our component inspector products, including the ICOS T830, inspect various semiconductor components that are handled in a tray, such as microprocessors or memory chips. Component inspection capability includes 3D coplanarity inspection, measurement of the evenness of the contacts, component heightZeta-5xx and two-dimensional (“2D”) surface inspection. In March 2017, we introduced the ICOS T3 and T7 Series tools, which provide high performance, fully automated optical inspection of packaged integrated circuit (IC) components, with either tray (T3) or tape (T7) output capability. Both incorporate the new SPECTRUM and SIGMA modules, which produce increased 2D and 3D measurement sensitivity for improved detection of issues that affect final package quality. In June 2017, KLA-Tencor acquired a privately-held company, whose products includeZeta-6xx optical surface profilers measuringmeasure both wafers and large panels for advanced packaging metrology applications. These applications include under-bump metallization (“UBM”) height and roughness, copper pillar height and roughness, and redistribution linelayer (“RDL”) height and width.
LED,
Compound Semiconductor, Power Device, Compound SemiconductorLED and MEMS Manufacturing
The compound semiconductor market comprises a diverse group of applications including power devices, radio frequency (“RF”) communications devices, photonics, LED lighting and photovoltaic and display markets. Our primary products for compound semiconductor manufacturing include the Candela 8520, Candela CS20, 8 Series and WI-2280 inspection systems, MicroXAM and Zeta optical profilers, and the P-Series and HRP-Series stylus profilers. These products are used for the inspection and metrology of substrates, epitaxial (“epi”) layers and process films.
Leading power device manufacturers are targeting faster development and ramp times, high product yields and lower device costs. To achieve these goals, they are implementing solutions for characterizing yield-limiting defects and processes. Full-surface, high sensitivity defect inspection and profiler metrology systems provide accurate process feedback, enabling improvements in SiC substrate quality and optimal epitaxial growth yields on both SiC epi and GaN-on-silicon processes.
KLA offers inspection and metrology systems to support power device manufacturing. The Candela 8520 inspection system integrates surface defect detection and photoluminescence technology for inspection and classification of a wide range of defects on SiC substrates and epi layers. The MicroXAM optical profilers measure step height, texture and form for power device applications. The P-Series and HRP-Series stylus profilers measure step heights and roughness for SiC substrates and patterned wafer applications.
LEDs are becoming more commonly used in solid-statesolid state lighting, television and notebook backlighting, and automotive applications. As LED device makers target aggressive cost and performance targets, they place significant emphasis on improved process control and yield during the manufacturing process.
KLA-TencorKLA offers a portfolio of systems to help LED manufacturers reduce production costs and increase product output: Candela 8720, WI-2280, 8 Series, UltraMap, MicroXAM Seriesand Zeta optical profilers and P-Series and HRP-Series stylus profilers. The Candela 8720 substrate and epi wafer inspection system provides automated inspection and quality control of LED substrates, detecting defects that can impact device performance, yield and field reliability. The WI-2280 system is designed specifically for defect inspection and 2D metrology for LED applications. The 8 Series provides patterned wafer defect inspection capability for LED manufacturing. UltraMap provides wafer geometry measurements on sapphire wafers. The MicroXAM Seriesand Zeta optical profilers measure step height, texture and form for LED applications. The P-SeriesP Series and HRP-Series stylus profilers are metrology systems for measurement of step heights and roughness for LED substrates and pattern wafer applications.
Leading power device manufacturers are targeting faster development and ramp times, high product yields and lower device costs. To achieve these goals, they are implementing solutions for characterizing yield-limiting defects and processes. Full-surface, high sensitivity defect inspection and profiler metrology systems provide accurate process feedback, enabling improvements in SiC substrate quality and optimal epitaxial growth yields on both SiC epi and GaN-on-silicon processes.
KLA-Tencor offers inspection and metrology systems to support power device manufacturing. The Candela CS920 inspection system integrates surface defect detection and photoluminescence technology for inspection and defect classification of a wide range of defects on SiC substrates and epi layers. The MicroXAM Series optical profilers measure step height, texture and form for power device applications. The P-Series and HRP-Series stylus profilers measure step heights and roughness for SiC substrates and patterned wafer applications.
Our primary products for compound semiconductor manufacturing include the Candela CS20 inspection system, the MicroXAM Series optical profilers and the P-Series and HRP-Series stylus profilers, used for the inspection and metrology of substrates, epi-layers and process films.

In October 2016, we introduced the P-170 stylus profiler with an integrated wafer handler, providing fully automated measurements to support LED, GaAs and power device manufacturers. In addition, the HRP-260 was introduced in July 2016 as the latest generation of our HRP (High Resolution Profiler) Series focused on providing both high resolution and high-aspect ratio surface topography profiling to support power device, LED, compound semiconductor and MEMS manufacturing. In June 2017, KLA-Tencor acquired a privately-held company, whose products include optical surface profilers serving LED and MEMS applications used to measure the cone height, diameter and pitch of The Zeta-388 measures patterned sapphire substrates (“PSS”) and inspects for LEDsdefects on high brightness LED substrates.
KLA offers a variety of products for the display market, including the ZetaScan Series defect inspector, SensArray Process Probe 2070, Zeta-300 optical profiler, P-17 OF stylus profiler, and serve broad applications for MEMS.the Nano Indenter nanomechanical tester.
The increasing demand for MEMS technology is coming from diverse industries such as automotive, space and consumer electronics. MEMS have the potential to transform many product categories by bringing together silicon-based microelectronics with micromachining technology, making possible the realization of complete systems-on-a-chip. KLA-TencorKLA offers tools and techniques for this emerging market, such as defect inspection and review, optical inspection and surface profiling which were first developed for the integrated circuit industry. Products that we offer for MEMS manufacturing arethis emerging market, as highlighted in the product table at the conclusion of this “Products” section.
Data Storage Media/Head Manufacturing
Advancements in data storage are being driven by a wave of innovative consumer electronics with small form factors and immense storage capacities, as well as an increasing need for high-volume storage options to back up modern methods ofsupport remote computing and networking, (suchsuch as cloud computing).computing. Our process control and yield management solutions are designed to enable customers to rapidly understand and resolve complex manufacturing problems, which can help improve time to market and product yields. In the front-endTo support manufacturing of substrates, media and back-end of thin-filmthin film head wafer manufacturing,wafers, we offer the same process control equipment that we serve to the semiconductor industry. In addition, we offer an extensive rangea portfolio of test equipment and surface profilers with particular strength in photolithography. In substrate and media manufacturing, we offer metrology and defect inspection solutions, with KLA-Tencor’s optical surface analyzers. Products that we offer for the data storage media/head manufacturing market manufacturing areas highlighted in the product table at the conclusion of this “Products” section.
General Purpose/Lab Applications
A range of industries, including general scientific and materials research and optoelectronics, require measurements of surface topography and film thickness, to either control their processes or research new material characteristics. Typical measurementsurface metrology parameters that our tools address include flatness, roughness, curvature, peak-to-valley, asperity, waviness, texture, volume, sphericity, slope, density, stress, hardness, bearing ratio and distancestep height (mainly in the micron to nanometer range). The June 2017 acquisitionFilm thickness measurements can also include determination of refractive index. We also offer a privately-held company added general metrology optical surface profilers to KLA-Tencor’s portfolio. These systems are complementary to KLA-Tencor’s original stylusportfolio of high-throughput nanomechanical testers for material characterization, including hardness, modulus and optical profiler product lines. The profiler and in-situ process monitoring products that we offer for general purpose/lab applications are highlighted in the product table at the conclusion of this “Products” section.adhesion.
K-T
Previous-Generation KLA Systems
Our KLA Pro
K-T Pro includes our K-T Certified group provides fully refurbished tested and certified systems, in addition to remanufactured legacy systems, and enhancements and upgrades for previous-generation KLA-Tencor tools.KLA systems. When a customer needs to move to the next manufacturing node, KLA-TencorKLA’s Pro offerings can help maximize the value of the customer’s existing assets.
K-T ServicesSpecialty Semiconductor Process:
SPTS Technologies, a wholly-owned subsidiary of KLA, designs, manufactures and markets wafer processing solutions for the global semiconductor and related industries. It provides etch and deposition processes on a range of single wafer handling platforms for wafer sizes up to 330mm, as well as 400mm taped frame assemblies. These products include etch and deposition equipment designed to address advanced IC packaging manufacturing, and also manufacturing of devices such as MEMS, LEDs, high speed RF and power semiconductors. The technology and products of SPTS are used by universities, research institutes, and full-scale production companies.
The Omega family of plasma etch solutions includes the Rapier, Synapse, and ICP process modules. The latest generation Rapier deep reactive ion etch (“DRIE”) module etches large and small structures in silicon MEMS devices such as microphones, accelerometers and gyroscopes. The Si etch modules are also used in advanced packaging to create through-silicon vias, and to rapidly etch wafers to a thickness of less than 10µm for very high density die stacking. The Synapse module etches strongly bond materials such as wide bandgap compounds for power switches, and piezoelectric resonators. The ICP module is used in the manufacture of devices such as RF power amplifiers and vertical cavity surface emitting lasers (“VCSELs”) and etches materials including dielectrics and III-V and II-VI semiconductors.
The Mosaic Plasma Dicing solution includes the Rapier-S series of process modules and uses a non-contact etch process to singulate die on full thickness and taped-framed wafers. Because plasma dicing does not cause chipping or cracking, chip designers can place die much closer together, increasing die count per wafer. Plasma dicing does not degrade silicon strength and produces fewer defects than conventional dicing techniques. These characteristics are increasingly important for zero-defect automotive applications and die-to-die bonding.
The Sigma systems deposit conducting and insulating layers by physical vapor deposition (PVD), sometimes referred to as “sputtering.” For the advanced packaging market, the Sigma system is used to create redistribution and under-bump layers in fan-in and fan-out packages. For power management devices, thick conductor layers are deposited on the front side of the wafer, and solderable stacks on the backside. In the RF/MEMS space, the Sigma system is used to deposit uniform, stress-controlled piezoelectric films for bulk acoustic wave (“BAW”) high frequency filters.
The Delta plasma enhanced chemical vapor deposition (“PECVD”) systems are used for a wide range of dielectric applications within MEMS, compound semiconductor, photonics and advanced packaging industries. SPTS specializes in depositing silicon oxide and nitride layers at temperatures below 200°C, with tightly controlled stress and optical properties.
The Primaxx HF Release Etch products are used to remove sacrificial silicon oxide layers, primarily to release silicon microstructures in MEMS devices. SPTS’s proprietary dry process avoids stiction of released moving parts and subsequent damage to delicate structures, common issues with conventional wet processing technology.
The Xactix XeF2 Release Etch products are used for isotropic etching of silicon to release MEMS devices. As a vapor phase etchant, XeF2 avoids many of the problems typically associated with wet or plasma etch processes.
Single wafer platforms: SPTS offers a range of single wafer handling platforms for Omega, Sigma, Mosaic, Delta, Primaxx, and Xactix systems for volume production, R&D and pilot production environments.
The MVD system replaces traditional liquid coating processes with a highly reproducible molecular vapor deposition (“MVD”) alternative that is valuable for MEMS/BioMEMS manufacturing applications. The MVD system is also used for commercial applications requiring moisture barriers, anti-corrosion coatings, or release layers for imprinting.
The Magna system uses inkjet technology for three-dimensional printing of underfill dam structures and thick isolating layers in defined areas of a chip, for volume production applications.
JEText is the latest generation inkjet system for semiconductor package marking.

PCB, Display and Component Inspection:
Printed Circuit Board (“PCB”) Manufacturing
PCBs are the basic interconnect platforms for the electronic components that comprise all electronic equipment. An assembly of one or more PCBs on which desired components have been mounted forms an essential part of most electronic products. PCBs are manufactured in a series of complex steps, generally starting with a sheet of epoxy-fiberglass (or other material with electric insulating qualities), laminated with a conducting material such as copper. The conductor pattern is subsequently transferred to the substrate either through a direct imaging (“DI”) or photolithographic process and a chemical etching process, followed by removal of excess conducting material, leaving the desired conducting metal pattern printed on the layer.
Because PCBs are susceptible to various defects (electrical shorts, open circuits and insufficient or off-measure conductor widths), inspection is required throughout PCB production to identify such defects, which are then repaired, if possible. Early detection of these defects increases the possibility of successful repair and reduces the number of unusable boards, thereby reducing the overall cost to the manufacturer. Early detection and repair are particularly valuable in cases of multilayered and ‘build-up’ boards, wherein PCB layers are embedded inside the finished board.
KLA’s Orbotech subsidiary manufactures several solutions intended for use by manufacturers of PCBs to streamline and increase the efficiency and yield of PCB production.
Direct Imaging (“DI”)
Direct imaging technology enables the manufacture of higher density, more complex PCBs, with significantly higher yields and reduced manufacturing costs, through the elimination of artwork costs and the scrap created by contact printing. The DI involves the transfer of digital image data directly from the electronic media onto the photoresist or solder resist, thereby eliminating the need for exposing photoresist through a production photolithography tool. This process translates into fewer manufacturing steps, lower material costs and greater accuracy of layer-to-layer registration.
Orbotech’s direct imaging (DI) solutions include the Nuvogo series, the Paragon-Ultra series, and the Orbotech Diamond series. Nuvogo is an advanced DI series for substrate-like PCB (“SLP”), modified semi-additive process (“mSAP”), advanced high density interconnect (“HDI”), and flex and advanced multi-layer PCB (“MLB”) mass production. The Paragon-Ultra series serves complex applications including flip chip ball grid array (“FC-BGA”), flip chip-chip scale package (“FC-CSP”) and BGA/CSP. Orbotech Diamond is a high capacity, high throughput DI series to address challenging surface topographies.
Automated Optical Inspection (“AOI”)
PCB-AOI solutions are computerized, electro-optical systems for inspection and identification of defects in PCBs and photolithography tools at various stages of production. Orbotech’s AOI solutions include the Ultra Dimension series, the Ultra Fusion/Fusion series and the Discovery II series. The Ultra Dimension series incorporates pattern inspection, laser via inspection, remote multi-image verification and two-dimensional metrology, to offer advanced electronics manufacturers a way to significantly improve their quality and yield. The Ultra Dimension solutions are suitable for advanced IC substrates, substrate-like PCB (“SLP”), modified semi-additive process (“mSAP”), advanced HDI, flexible printed circuits and more. The Fusion/Ultra Fusion series inspection solutions include offerings for advanced IC substrates, SLP, mSAP, advanced HDI, flexible printed circuits and more. The Discovery II AOI series AOI handles inspection challenges for MLB, quick turnaround (“QTA”), flex and HDI mass production.
Automated Optical Shaping (“AOS”)
AOS solutions are designed to address certain limitations inherent in the manual repair of PCBs by enabling the automatic shaping of defects in PCB production. Such defects include excess copper (causing electrical shorts) and missing copper (causing electrical opens). Efficient shaping can reduce the scrapping of unusable panels during the manufacturing process, enabling a significant reduction in manufacturers’ overall manufacturing costs. Orbotech AOS solutions ablate the excess conductor material or add copper where missing, and are commonly used for advanced PCBs, where manual repair is not practical.
Orbotech’s Precise series is an automated solution for shaping both open and shorts defects for increasingly fine line/space circuitry. The PerFix series addresses excess copper defects for advanced IC substrates, fine line applications, SLP/mSAP, advanced flex applications, and complex HDI and MLB manufacturing.

Inkjet/Additive Printing
Additive printing refers to the stage in the PCB manufacturing process during which characters and other non-functional patterns (“legends”) are printed on the PCB. Using a digital, non-contact, additive-based printing technology, digital print heads release droplets of ink from small apertures directly onto a given medium to create the required image. The Sprint series is our flagship solution for additive printing.
Laser Drilling
Ultraviolet (“UV”) laser drilling is used to generate the interconnection (vias) between different layers in IC substrates for advanced packaging applications, where traditional mechanical drills or CO2 laser techniques cannot achieve the accuracy required. The Emerald 160 UV laser drilling solutions address challenging IC substrate, IC packaging and flex applications, including skiving and routing.
Laser Plotting
Laser plotters provide PCB manufacturers with the capability to quickly transform circuit designs on electronic media or design data retrieved from computer aided manufacturing (“CAM”) databases into accurate, reliable artwork for production photolithography tools. Orbotech’s LP-9 high speed laser plotters are designed for printing high density jobs on film that is subsequently used in the traditional PCB photolithography process.
Smart Factory/Industry 4.0
Orbotech Smart Factory is an Industry 4.0 compliant solution that delivers manufacturing intelligence to help manufacturers increase yield, improve production floor management and better track production trends.
Pre-Production
CAM and engineering solutions from Frontline P.C.B. Solutions Limited Partnership (“Frontline”), an Orbotech subsidiary, are designed for use in the PCB pre-production phase to facilitate automation and integration of the sales, tooling, production data and inspection needs associated with PCB production.
Display Manufacturing
Flat Panel Display (“FPDs”), which include liquid-crystal displays (“LCDs”), organic light-emitting diode (“OLED”) displays and other types of displays, are currently used for laptop and desktop computers, tablets, televisions, smartphones, public electronic signs, automotive displays, digital and video cameras, augmented reality/virtual reality (“AR/VR”), wearable devices and a variety of other devices for technical, medical, military, aerospace and consumer electronics applications. LCDs and OLEDs are susceptible to various defects, many of which result from the deposition, photolithography and etching processes used in their production. Detection and repair of these defects during the production process allows manufacturers to improve monitoring of their production processes, avoid the expense of further costly material and improve their yields.
Orbotech’s FPD AOI and test systems identify and classify defects that may impact the performance of the display panel, while our repair systems are designed to enable customers to repair defects, thereby further improving the manufacturer’s yield and grade (quality) of displays.
Automated Optical Inspection (AOI)
Orbotech’s automated optical inspection solutions accommodate all types of display panels up to and including Gen 10.5. The Quantum and FPI-6000 product lines inspect and classify defects to boost yield of high-volume LCD and flex OLED display production.
Electrical Testing
Orbotech’s electrical test systems detect, locate, quantify and characterize electrical, contamination and other defects in active matrix LCD and OLED displays after array fabrication. These systems determine whether individual pixels or lines of pixels are functional and also identify subtle defects such as variations in individual pixel voltage. These defect data files are then used for repair and statistical process control. The Array Checker and Accelon systems comprise Orbotech’s electrical testing portfolio.

Repair
Orbotech’s Prism and Array Saver systems repair defects of any shape and any pattern for high-end TVs and flex OLED displays.
Component Inspection
For packaged IC component inspection, the ICOS F160 system performs inspection and die sorting after wafer-level packages are tested and diced. Our packaged IC component inspector products, including the ICOS T890, inspect various semiconductor components that are handled in a tray, such as microprocessors or memory chips. Component inspection capability includes 3D coplanarity inspection, measurement of the evenness of the contacts, component height and two-dimensional (“2D”) surface inspection. The ICOS T3 and T7 Series tools provide high performance, fully automated optical inspection of packaged IC components, with either tray (T3) or tape (T7) output capability. Both incorporate the SPECTRUM and SIGMA modules, which produce increased 2D and 3D measurement sensitivity for improved detection of issues that affect final package quality. The MV Series provides several configurations to support fully automated or portable optical inspection of packaged integrated circuit components with tape or tray output.
Other:
KLA engages in the research, development and marketing of products for the deposition of thin film coating of various materials on crystalline silicon photovoltaic wafers for solar energy panels.
KLA Services:
Our K-T Services program enablesservices programs enable our customers in all business sectors to maintain the high performance and productivity of our products through a flexible portfolio of services. Whether a manufacturing site is producing integrated circuits, wafers, reticles, ICs, display or reticles, K-T Services delivers yield management expertise spanning advanced technology nodes, including collaborationPCB products, our service teams collaborate with customers to determine the best products and services to meet technology requirements and optimize cost of ownership. Our comprehensive services include service engineers, technical support teams and knowledge management systems; and an extensive parts network to ensure worldwide availability of parts.business requirements.

Product Table
SEGMENTMARKETSAPPLICATIONSPRODUCTS
Chip ManufacturingSemiconductor Process Control
 Chip and Wafer Manufacturing
Front-End Defect Inspection | Review
Patterned Wafer
3900 Series, 2930 Series, 292039xx, 29xx Series
PumaTM 9980Puma™ Series PumaTM 9850 Series, PumaTM 9650 Series
Voyager™ 1015
High Productivity and All Surface
CIRCLTMCIRCL™ with 8 Series, CV350i, BDR300BDR300™TM and Micro300 modules
8 Series
Unpatterned Wafer/Surface
Surfscan® SP3 and Surfscan® SP5SPx Series

ReticleElectron-beam Review
X5.3™, TeroneDR72xxTM SL650 Series
Data ManagementAnalytics
Klarity® product family
Defect ReviewElectron-beam
eDR72005D AnalyzerTM®
RDC
 SeriesFabVision®
ProDATA™
MetrologyPatterning Control5D Patterning Control Solution™
Overlay
ArcherArcher™TMSeries
ATL™ Series
Optical CD and Shape
SpectraShapeTMSpectraShape™ product family
Film Thickness/Index
SpectraFilmTMSpectraFilm™ product family
AlerisTM® product family
Filmetrics F Series products
Wafer Geometry and Topography
WaferSight™ Series
PWG™ Series
WaferSightMicrosense UltraMapTM®Series
Edge Bead RemovalCIRCL™
Ion Implant and Anneal
Therma-Probe®680xp
Resistivity
OmniMap® RS product family
CIPTech®
microHall® Series
Magnetic MetrologyMicroSense PKMRAM, KerrMapper
Surface Metrology
HRP® product familySeries
P-Series product familyP Series
ResistivityRS product family
Zeta™ Series
Data ManagementAnalytics
5D Analyzer®, K-T Analyzer®
In-SituIn Situ Process MonitoringManagement
Lithography, Plasma Etch, Deposition, CMP, Ion Implant, Wet Processing
SensArray® product family
AMW
In Situ Data Analytics
Lithography, Plasma Etch, Deposition, CMP, Ion Implant, Wet Processing
SensArray® PlasmaSuite, LithoSuite, ThermalSuite
Patterning Simulation
Lithography SimulationPROLITH™




SEGMENTMARKETSAPPLICATIONSPRODUCTS
Reticle Manufacturing and Quality Control
Defect Inspection (mask shop)
Teron™600Series, TeraScan™500XR
Defect Inspection (wafer fab)Teron™ SL6xx Series, X5.3™
Defect Inspection (mask blanks)
FlashScan®
Pattern Placement MetrologyLMS IPRO Series
Data Analytics
RDC, Klarity®product family
Packaging Manufacturing
Wafer-Level Packaging Inspection | MetrologyCIRCL™-AP, Kronos 1080, WI-2280, Zeta-5xx/6xx
Automated Optical Inspection
Ultra Fusion™
VeriFine™
Ultra Dimension™
Data Analytics
Klarity® product family
Compound Semiconductor | HDD Manufacturing
LED, Photonics, RF Communications
8 Series, WI-2280, Candela® 8720, Zeta-388, MicroXAM Series, P Series, HRP® Series, MicroSense UltraMap® Series
Power Devices
8 Series, WI-2280, Candela® 8520, MicroXAM Series, P Series, HRP® Series
MEMS
8 Series, P Series, HRP®Series, MicroXAM Series, Zeta-20, Zeta-300, Zeta-388, Nano Indenter® G200X
CPV Solar
ZetaScan Series, Zeta-20, Zeta-300
MicroSense PV-6060, UltraMap Series
Display
ZetaScan Series, SensArray® Process Probe 2070, Zeta-300, P-17 OF, Nano Indenter® G200X
Data Storage Media | Head Manufacturing
8 Series, Candela® 71xx, Candela® 63xx, HRP® Series, P Series, Zeta-20, MicroXAM Series
MicroSense Polar Kerr, DiskMapper
Data Analytics
Klarity® product family
Implant and WetGeneral Purpose/Lab Applications
Surface Metrology: Stylus Profiling
SensArrayP Series, Alpha-Step® PlasmaSuiteproduct family, HRP® Series
Lithography SoftwareSurface Metrology: Optical ProfilingLithography SimulationMicroXAM Series, Zeta™ Series, Filmetrics Profilm3D
Nanomechanical Testers
PROLITHNano IndenterTM® G200X, T150 UTM
iMicro, iNano®
Specialty Semiconductor Process Window Analysis
Semiconductor Manufacturing
EtchOmega™ Series
Plasma DicingMosaic™ Series
Deposition
ProDATATMSigma™ Series
Delta™ Series
Primaxx™ Series
Xactix™ Series
MVD Series
Additive Printing
Magna™
JEText™

SEGMENTMARKETS AND APPLICATIONSPRODUCTS
Wafer ManufacturingPCB, Display and Component Inspection
Surface and Defect InspectionPrinted Circuit Boards
Direct Imaging
Surfscan® SP3Nuvogo™ Series and Surfscan® SP5
Paragon™ Series
Orbotech Diamond™ Series
Wafer Geometry and Nanotopography MetrologyAutomated Optical Inspection
WaferSightTMUltra Dimension™ Series
Ultra Fusion™/ Fusion™ Series
Discovery™ II Series
Data ManagementAutomated Optical Shaping
FabVision®Precise™ Series
Ultra PerFix™/ PerFix™ Series
ReticleInkjet / Additive PrintingSprint™ Series
UV Laser DrillingEmerald™ 160 Series
Laser PlottersLP™-9 Family
Computer Aided Engineering / ManufacturingFrontline InCAM Series, InQuery, InPlan, InPlan Flex
Defect Display
Inspection
TeraScanTM 500XR and TeronTM 600Orbotech Quantum™ Series
FPI-6000
Pattern Placement MetrologyElectrical TestingLMS IPRO Series
Array Checker™
Accelon
Advanced PackagingRepair
Orbotech Prism™
Array Saver™
Wafer-Level Packaging
CIRCL-APTM
89xx-AP
WI-22x0 Series
Components
Component Inspection
ICOS® T830 andF160, ICOS® T890, ICOS® T3 and T7 Series
LED, Power Device, Compound Semiconductor and MEMS Manufacturing
Patterned Wafer Inspection
8MV Series
WI product family
Defect Inspection (substrates and epi wafers)Other
Photovoltaic Manufacturing
Deposition
CandelaAurora PECVD® product family
Surface Metrology
P-Series product family
MicroXAM Series
HRP® product family
Data Storage Media/Head Manufacturing
Thin-Film Head Metrology and Inspection
Aleris product family
CIRCLTM with 8 Series, CV350i, BDR300 and Micro300 modules
8 Series
HRP® product family
P-Series product family
Virtual Lithography
PROLITHTM
In-Situ Process Monitoring
SensArray® product family
Transparent and Metal Substrate Inspection
Candela® product family
Data Management
Klarity® Defect
5D Analyzer®, K-T Analyzer®
General Purpose/Lab Applications
Surface Metrology: Stylus Profiling
P-Series product family
Alpha-Step® product family
HRP® product family
Surface Metrology: Optical ProfilingMicroXAM Series
Process Chamber Conditions
SensArray® product family
The product information shown in the tables above excludes some products that were solely offered through our K-T Certified refurbished tools program.

Customers
To support our growing global customer base, we maintain a significant presence throughout Asia, the United States and Europe, staffed with local sales and applications engineers, customer and field service engineers and yield management consultants. We count among our largest customers the leading semiconductor, semiconductor-related and electronic device manufacturers in each of these regions.
For the fiscal years ended June 30, 20172019, 20162018, and 20152017, the following customers each accounted for more than 10% of total revenues:revenues primarily in Semiconductor Process Control segment:
Year ended June 30,
2017 2016 2015
Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. Micron Technology, Inc. Intel Corporation
2019 2018 2017
Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company Limited Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company Limited Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.
 Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company Limited 
 Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company Limited
Our business depends upon the capital expenditures of semiconductor, semiconductor-related and electronic device manufacturers, which in turn is driven by the current and anticipated market demand for ICs, and products utilizing ICs.ICs and other electronic components. We do not consider our business to be seasonal in nature, but it has historically been cyclical with respect to the capital equipment procurement practices of semiconductor manufacturers, and it is impacted by the investment patterns of such manufacturers in different global markets. Downturns in the semiconductor industry or other industries in which we operate, or slowdowns in the worldwide economy as well as customer consolidation could have a material adverse effect on our future business and financial results.

Sales, Service and Marketing
Our sales, service and marketing efforts are aimed at building long-term relationships with our customers. We focus on providing a single and comprehensive resource for the full breadth of process control, process-enabling and yield management productssolutions for manufacturing and services.testing wafers and reticles, integrated circuits (“IC” or “chip”), packaging, light emitting diodes, power devices, compound semiconductor devices, microelectromechanical systems, data storage, printed circuit boards and flat and flexible panel displays, as well as general materials research. Our customers benefit from the simplified planning and coordination, as well as the increased equipment compatibility, which are realized as a result of dealing with a single supplier for multiple products and services. Our revenues are derived primarily from product sales and related service contracts, mostly through our direct sales force.
We believe that the size and location of our field sales, service and applications engineering, and marketing organizations represent a competitive advantage in our served markets. We have direct sales forces in Asia, the United States and Europe. We maintain an export compliance program that is designed to meet the requirements of the United States Departments of Commerce and State.
As of June 30, 20172019, we employed approximately 2,2204,280 full-time sales and related personnel, service engineers and applications engineers. In addition to sales and service offices in the United States, we conduct sales, marketing and services out of subsidiaries or branches in other countries, including Belgium, China, Germany, Israel, United Kingdom, Japan, Singapore, Korea and Taiwan. International revenues accounted for approximately 86%87%, 82%88% and 71%86% of our total revenues in the fiscal years ended June 30, 2017, 20162019, 2018 and 2015,2017, respectively. Additional information regarding our revenues from foreign operations for our last three fiscal years can be found in Note 17, “Segment Reporting and Geographic Information” to the consolidated financial statements.Consolidated Financial Statements.
We believe that sales outside the United States will continue to be a significant percentage of our total revenues. Our future performance will depend, in part, on our ability to continue to compete successfully in Asia, one of the largest markets for our equipment. Our ability to compete in this area is dependent upon the continuation of favorable trading relationships between countries in the region and the United States, and our continuing ability to maintain satisfactory relationships with leading semiconductor companies in the region.

International sales and operations may be adversely affected by the imposition of governmental controls, restrictions on export technology, political instability, trade restrictions, changes in tariffs and the difficulties associated with staffing and managing international operations. In addition, international sales may be adversely affected by the economic conditions in each country and by fluctuations in currency exchange rates, and such fluctuations may negatively impact our ability to compete on price with local providers or the value of revenues we generate from our international business. Although we attempt to manage some of the currency risk inherent in non-U.S. dollar product sales through hedging activities, there can be no assurance that such efforts will be adequate. These factors, as well as any of the other risk factors related to our international business and operations that are described in Item 1A, “Risk Factors,” could have a material adverse effect on our future business and financial results.
Backlog
Our shipment backlog for systemswhich represents our performance obligation to deliver products and associated warrantyservices, totaled $1.46$1.84 billion and $1.21$1.62 billion as of June 30, 20172019 and 20162018, respectively, and primarily consists of sales orders where written customer requests have been received and a majority of the delivery is anticipated within the next 12 months. Orders for service contracts and unreleased products are excluded from shipmentincluded in the backlog. All orders are subject to risk of delays, pushouts, and cancellation or delay by the customer, oftenusually with limited or no penalties. We make adjustments for shipment backlog obtained from acquired companies, sales order cancellations, customer delivery date changes and currency adjustments. Shipment backlog is not subject to normal accounting controls for information that is either reported in or derived from our consolidated financial statements. In addition, the concept of shipment backlog is not defined in the accounting literature, making comparisons between periods and with other companies difficult and potentially misleading.
Our revenue backlog, which includes the gross value of sales orders where physical deliveries have been completed, but for which revenue has not been recognized pursuant to our policy for revenue recognition, totaled $328.0 million and $255.0 million as of June 30, 2017 and 2016, respectively. Orders for service contracts are excluded from revenue backlog.
Because customers can potentially change delivery schedules or delay or cancel orders, and because some orders are received and shipped within the same quarter, our shipment backlog at any particular date is not necessarily indicative of business volumes or actual sales for any succeeding periods. The historical cyclicality of the semiconductor industry combined with the lead times from our suppliers sometimes result in timing disparities between, on the one hand, our ability to manufacture, deliver and install products and, on the other, the requirements of our customers. In our efforts to balance the requirements of our customers with the availability of resources, management of our operating model and other factors, we often must exercise discretion and judgment as to the timing and prioritization of manufacturing, deliveries and installations of products, which may impact the timing of revenue recognition with respect to such products.

Research and Development
The market for yield managementsemiconductor and process monitoring systemselectronics industries is characterized by rapid technological development and product innovation. These technical innovations are inherently complex and require long development cycles and appropriate professional staffing. We believe that continued and timely development of new products and enhancements to existing products are necessary to maintain our competitive position. Accordingly, we devote a significant portion of our human and financial resources to research and development programs and seek to maintain close relationships with customers to remain responsive to their needs. In addition, we may enter into certain strategic development and engineering programs whereby certain government agencies or other third parties fund a portion of our research and development costs. As of June 30, 2017,2019, we employed approximately 1,5602,710 full-time research and development personnel.
Our key research and development activities during the fiscal year ended June 30, 20172019 involved the development of process control and yield management equipment aimed at addressing the challenges posed by shrinking device sizes, the transition to new production materials, new device and circuit architecture, more demanding lithography processes and new back-end packaging techniques. For information regarding our research and development expenses during the last three fiscal years, see Item 7, “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

The strength of our competitive positions in many of our existing markets is largely due to our leading technology, which is the result of our continuing significant investments in product research and development. Even during down cycles in the semiconductor industry, we have remained committed to significant engineering efforts toward both product improvement and new product development in order to enhance our competitive position. New product introductions, however, may contribute to fluctuations in operating results, since customers may defer ordering existing products, and, if new products have reliability or quality problems, those problems may result in reduced orders, higher manufacturing costs, delays in acceptance of and payment for new products, and additional service and warranty expenses. There can be no assurance that we will successfully develop and manufacture new products, or that new products introduced by us will be accepted in the marketplace. If we do not successfully introduce new products, our results of operations will be adversely affected.
Manufacturing, Raw Materials and Supplies
We perform system design, assembly and testing in-house and utilize an outsourcing strategy for the manufacture of components and major subassemblies. Our in-house manufacturing activities consist primarily of assembling and testing components and subassemblies that are acquired through third-party vendors and integrating those subassemblies into our finished products. Our principal manufacturing activities take place in the United States, (Milpitas, California), Singapore, Israel, Germany, United Kingdom, Italy, and China. As of June 30, 20172019, we employed approximately 10901,690 full-time manufacturing personnel.
Some critical parts, components and subassemblies (collectively, “parts”) that we use are designed by us and manufactured by suppliers in accordance with our specifications, while other parts are standard commercial products. We use numerous vendors to supply parts and raw materials for the manufacture and support of our products. Although we make reasonable efforts to ensure that these parts and raw materials are available from multiple suppliers, this is not always possible, and certain parts and raw materials included in our systems may be obtained only from a single supplier or a limited group of suppliers. Through our business interruption planning, we endeavor to minimize the risk of production interruption by, among other things, monitoring the financial condition of suppliers of key parts and raw materials, identifying (but not necessarily qualifying) possible alternative suppliers of such parts and materials, and ensuring adequate inventories of key parts and raw materials are available to maintain manufacturing schedules.
Although we seek to reduce our dependence on sole and limited source suppliers, in some cases the partial or complete loss of certain of these sources, or disruptions within our suppliers’ often-complex supply chains, could disrupt scheduled deliveries to customers, damage customer relationships and have a material adverse effect on our results of operations.
Competition
The worldwide market for technologically advanced, process control, process-enabling and yield management systemssolutions used by semiconductor and electronics manufactures is highly competitive. In each of our product markets, we face competition from established and potential competitors, such as Applied Materials, Inc., ASML Holding N.V., Hitachi High-Technologies Corporation, Nanometrics, Inc. and Rudolph Technologies, Inc., some of which may have greater financial, research, engineering, manufacturing and marketing resources than we have. We may also face future competition from new market entrants from other overseas and domestic sources. We expect our competitors to continue to improve the design and performance of their current products and processes and to introduce new products and processes with improved price and performance characteristics. We believe that, to remain competitive, we will require significant financial resources to offer a

broad range of products, to maintain customer service and support centers worldwide, and to invest in product and process research and development.
We believe that, while price and delivery are important competitive factors, the customers’ overriding requirement is for systems that easily and effectively incorporate automated and highly accurate inspection and metrology capabilities into their existing manufacturing processes to enhance productivity. Significant competitive factors in the market for process control and yield management systems include system performance, ease of use, reliability, interoperability with the existing installed base and technical service and support, as well as overall cost of ownership.
Management believes that we are well positioned in the market with respect to both our products and services. However, any loss of competitive position could negatively impact our prices, customer orders, revenues, gross margins and market share, any of which would negatively impact our operating results and financial condition.

Acquisitions and Alliances
We continuously evaluate strategic acquisitions and alliances to expand our technologies, product offerings and distribution capabilities. Acquisitions involve numerous risks, including management issues and costs in connection with integration of the operations, technologies and products of the acquired companies, and the potential loss of key employees of the acquired companies. The inability to manage these risks effectively could negatively impact our operating results and financial condition.
Patents and Other Proprietary Rights
We protect our proprietary technology through reliance on a variety of intellectual property laws, including patent, copyright and trade secret. We have filed and obtained a number of patents in the United States and abroad and intend to continue pursuing the legal protection of our technology through intellectual property laws. In addition, from time to time we acquire license rights under United States and foreign patents and other proprietary rights of third parties, and we attempt to protect our trade secrets and other proprietary information through confidentiality and other agreements with our customers, suppliers, employees and consultants and through other security measures.
Although we consider patents and other intellectual property significant to our business, dueno single patent, copyright or trade secret is in itself essential to the rapid paceus as a whole or to any of innovation within the process control and yield management systems industry, we believe that our protection through patent and other intellectual property rights is less important than factors such as our technological expertise, continuing development of new systems, market penetration, installed base and the ability to provide comprehensive support and service to customers worldwide.business segments.
No assurance can be given that patents will be issued on any of our applications, that license assignments will be made as anticipated, or that our patents, licenses or other proprietary rights will be sufficiently broad to protect our technology. No assurance can be given that any patents issued to or licensed by us will not be challenged, invalidated or circumvented or that the rights granted thereunder will provide us with a competitive advantage. In addition, there can be no assurance that we will be able to protect our technology or that competitors will not be able to independently develop similar or functionally competitive technology.
Environmental Matters
We are subject to a variety of federal, state and local governmental laws and regulations related to the protection of the environment, including without limitation the management of hazardous materials that we use in our business operations. Compliance with these environmental laws and regulations has not had, and is not expected to have, a material effect on our capital expenditures, financial condition, results of operations or competitive position.
However, any failure to comply with environmental laws and regulations may subject us to a range of consequences, including fines, suspension of certain of our business activities, limitations on our ability to sell our products, obligations to remediate environmental contamination, and criminal and civil liabilities or other sanctions. In addition, changes in environmental laws and regulations could require us to invest in potentially costly pollution control equipment, alter our manufacturing processes or use substitute materials. Our failure to comply with these laws and regulations could subject us to future liabilities.
Employees
As of June 30, 20172019, we employed approximately 5,99010,020 full-time employees. Except for our employees in Belgium (where a trade union delegation has been recognized) and our employees in the German operations of our MIE business unit (who are represented by employee works council), none of our employees are represented by a labor union. We have not experienced work stoppages and believe that our employee relations are good.

Competition is intense in the recruiting of personnel in the semiconductor and semiconductor equipment industry. We believe that our future success will depend, in part, on our continued ability to hire and retain qualified management, marketing and technical employees.



Glossary
This section provides definitions for certain industry and technical terms commonly used in our business, which are used elsewhere in this Item 1:
back-endactive matrix Process steps that make upA technology used in flat panel displays to control the second half ofimaging-produced active areas where the semiconductor manufacturing process, from contact through completion of the wafer prior to electrical test.display pixels are located.
   
broadband  An illumination source with a wide spectral bandwidth.
computer-aided manufacturing (CAM)An application technology that uses computer software and machinery to facilitate and automate manufacturing processes.
   
critical dimension (CD)  The dimension of a specified geometry (such as the width of a patterned line or the distance between two lines) that must be within design tolerances in order to maintain semiconductor device performance consistency.
   
design rules  Rules that set forth the allowable dimensions of particular features used in the design and layout of integrated circuits.
   
design technology co-optimization (DTCO) The methodology of optimizing semiconductor design and process simultaneously during the technology definition phase.
   
die  The term for a single semiconductor chip on a wafer.
   
electron-beam  An illumination source comprised of a stream of electrons emitted by a single source.
   
epitaxial silicon (epi) A substrate technology based on growing a crystalline silicon layer on top of a silicon wafer. The added layer, where the structure and orientation are matched to those of the silicon wafer, includes dopants (impurities) to imbue the substrate with special electronic properties.
   
excursion  For a manufacturing step or process, a deviation from normal operating conditions that can lead to decreased performance or yield of the final product.
   
fab The main manufacturing facility for processing semiconductor wafers.
   
front-endflat panel display (FPD)A display appliance that uses a thin panel design. Also includes flexible displays.
flexible printed circuit (FPC)Flexible circuits in a device provide mechanical support and connect various electrical and mechanical components together using material that can be shaped, bent, twisted or folded.
front end  The processes that make up the first half of the semiconductor manufacturing process, from wafer start through final contact window processing.
   
in-situhigh-density interconnect (HDI)HDI PCBs have a higher wiring density per unit area, finer lines and spaces, smaller vias, smaller capture pads and higher connection pad density than conventional PCBs.
in situ  Refers to processing steps or tests that are done without moving the wafer. Latin for “in original position.”
   
interconnect  A highly conductive material, usually copper or aluminum, which carries electrical signals to different parts of a die.
   
liquid crystal display (LCD)A flat panel display technology that uses a backlight to provide light to individual pixels arranged in a grid.

lithography  A process in which a masked pattern is projected onto a photosensitive coating that covers a substrate.
   
mask shop  A manufacturer that produces the reticles used by semiconductor manufacturers.
   
metrology  The science of measurement to determine dimensions, quantity or capacity. In the semiconductor industry, typical measurements include critical dimension, overlay and film thickness.
   
microelectromechanical systems (MEMS) Micron-sized mechanical devices powered by electricity, created using processes similar to those used to manufacture IC devices.
   
micron  
A metric unit of linear measure that equals 1/1,000,000 meter (10-6m), or 10,000 angstroms (the diameter of a human hair is approximately 75 microns).
   
Moores Law
 An observation made by Gordon Moore in 1965 and revised in 1975 that the number of transistors on a typical integrated circuit doubles approximately every two years.
   
multi-layer boards (MLB)A printed circuit board (PCB) made up of three or more conductive layers that are pressed together.
nanometer (nm)  
One billionth (10-9) of a meter.
   

organic light emitting diode (OLED)A flat panel display technology containing thin flexible sheets of an organic electroluminescent material, used for visual displays.
patterned  For semiconductor manufacturing and industries using similar processing technologies, refers to substrates that have electronic circuits (transistors, interconnects, etc.) fabricated on the surface.
   
photoresist  A radiation-sensitive material that, when properly applied to a variety of substrates and then properly exposed and developed, masks portions of the substrate with a high degree of integrity.
   
printed circuit board (PCB)A board used to mechanically support and electrically connect various electrical and mechanical components.
process control  The ability to maintain specifications of products and equipment during manufacturing operations.
   
reticle  A very flat glass plate that contains the patterns to be reproduced on a wafer.
   
silicon-on-insulatorsilicon on insulator (SOI) A substrate technology comprised of a thin top silicon layer separated from the silicon substrate by a thin insulating layer of glass or silicon dioxide, used to improve performance and reduce the power consumption of IC circuits.
   
SLP/mSAPSubstrate-like PCB/modified semi-additive process is an advanced manufacturing process or technique that enables fine line and space patterns with higher manufacturing precision that maximizes circuit density.
substrate  A wafer or other material on which layers of various materials are added during the process of manufacturing semiconductor devices (circuits), flat panel displays or circuits.printed circuit boards.
   
unpatterned  For semiconductor manufacturing and industries using similar processing technologies, refers to substrates that do not have electronic circuits (transistors, interconnects, etc.) fabricated on the surface. These can include bare silicon wafers, other bare substrates or substrates on which blanket films have been deposited.
   
yield management  The ability of a semiconductor manufacturer to oversee, manage and control its manufacturing processes so as to maximize the percentage of manufactured wafers or die that conform to pre-determined specifications.
__________________ 

The definitions above are from internal sources, as well as online semiconductor dictionaries such as https://www.semiconductors.org/faq/glossary/.







ITEM 1A.RISK FACTORS
A description of factors that could materially affect our business, financial condition or operating results is provided below.
Risks Associated with Our Industry
Ongoing changes in the technology industry, as well as the semiconductor industry in particular, could expose our business to significant risks.
The semiconductor equipment industry and other industries that we serve, including the semiconductor, flat panel display and printed circuit board industries, are constantly developing and changing over time. Many of the risks associated with operating in these industries are comparable to the risks faced by all technology companies, such as the uncertainty of future growth rates in the industries that we serve, pricing trends in the end-markets for consumer electronics and other products (which place a growing emphasis on our customers’ cost of ownership), changes in our customers’ capital spending patterns and, in general, an environment of constant change and development, including decreasing product and component dimensions; use of new materials; and increasingly complex device structures, applications and process steps. If we fail to appropriately adjust our cost structure and operations to adapt to any of these trends, or, with respect to technological advances, if we do not timely develop new technologies and products that successfully anticipate and address these changes, we could experience a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and operating results.
In addition, we face a number of risks specific to ongoing changes in the semiconductor industry, as the significant majority of our sales are madeour process control and yield management products sold to semiconductor manufacturers. Some of the trends that our management monitors in operating our business include the following:
the potential for reversal of the long-term historical trend of declining cost per transistor with each new generation of technological advancement within the semiconductor industry, and the adverse impact that such reversal may have upon our business;
the increasing cost of building and operating fabrication facilities and the impact of such increases on our customers’ capital equipment investment decisions;
differing market growth rates and capital requirements for different applications, such as memory, logic and foundry;
lower level of process control adoption by our memory customers compared to our foundry and logic customers;
our customers’ reuse of existing and installed products, which may decrease their need to purchase new products or solutions at more advanced technology nodes;
the emergence of disruptive technologies that change the prevailing semiconductor manufacturing processes (or the economics associated with semiconductor manufacturing) and, as a result, also impact the inspection and metrology requirements associated with such processes;
the higher design costs for the most advanced integrated circuits, which could economically constrain leading-edge manufacturing technology customers to focus their resources on only the large, technologically advanced products and applications;
the possible introduction of integrated products by our larger competitors that offer inspection and metrology functionality in addition to managing other semiconductor manufacturing processes;
changes in semiconductor manufacturing processes that are extremely costly for our customers to implement and, accordingly, our customers could reduce their available budgets for process control equipment by reducing inspection and metrology sampling rates for certain technologies;
the bifurcation of the semiconductor manufacturing industry into (a) leading edge manufacturers driving continued research and development into next-generation products and technologies and (b) other manufacturers that are content with existing (including previous generation) products and technologies;
the ever escalating cost of next-generation product development, which may result in joint development programs between us and our customers or government entities to help fund such programs that could restrict our control of, ownership of and profitability from the products and technologies developed through those programs; and
the entry by some semiconductor manufacturers into collaboration or sharing arrangements for capacity, cost or risk with other manufacturers, as well as increased outsourcing of their manufacturing activities, and greater focus only on specific markets or applications, whether in response to adverse market conditions or other market pressures.

Any of the changes described above may negatively affect our customers’ rate of investment in the capital equipment that we produce, which could result in downward pressure on our prices, customer orders, revenues and gross margins. If we do not successfully manage the risks resulting from any of these or other potential changes in our industries, our business, financial condition and operating results could be adversely impacted.

We are exposed to risks associated with a highly concentrated customer base.
Our customer base, particularly in the semiconductor industry, historically has been and is becoming increasingly, highly concentrated due to corporate consolidation, acquisitions and business closures. In this environment, orders from a relatively limited number of manufacturers have accounted for, and are expected to continue to account for, a substantial portion of our sales. This increasing concentration exposes our business, financial condition and operating results to a number of risks, including the following:
The mix and type of customers, and sales to any single customer, may vary significantly from quarter to quarter and from year to year, which exposes our business and operating results to increased volatility tied to individual customers.
New orders from our foundry customers in the past several years have constituted a significant portion of our total orders. This concentration increases the impact that future business or technology changes within the foundry industry may have on our business, financial condition and operating results.
In a highly concentrated business environment, if a particular customer does not place an order, or if they delay or cancel orders, we may not be able to replace the business. Furthermore, because our process control and yield management products are configured to each customer’s specifications, any changes, delays or cancellations of orders may result in significant, non-recoverable costs.
As a result of this consolidation, the customers that survive the consolidation represent a greater portion of our sales and, consequently, have greater commercial negotiating leverage. Many of our large customers have more aggressive policies regarding engaging alternative, second-source suppliers for the products we offer and, in addition, may seek and, on occasion, receive pricing, payment, intellectual property-related or other commercial terms that may have an adverse impact on our business. Any of these changes could negatively impact our prices, customer orders, revenues and gross margins.
Certain customers have undergone significant ownership changes, created alliances with other companies, experienced management changes or have outsourced manufacturing activities, any of which may result in additional complexities in managing customer relationships and transactions. Any future change in ownership or management of our existing customers may result in similar challenges, including the possibility of the successor entity or new management deciding to select a competitor’s products.
The highly concentrated business environment also increases our exposure to risks related to the financial condition of each of our customers. For example, as a result of the challenging economic environment during fiscal year 2009, we were (and in some cases continue to be) exposed to additional risks related to the continued financial viability of certain of our customers. To the extent our customers experience liquidity issues in the future, we may be required to incur additional bad debt expense with respect to receivables owed to us by those customers. In addition, customers with liquidity issues may be forced to reduce purchases of our equipment, delay deliveries of our products, discontinue operations or may be acquired by one of our customers, and in either case such event would have the effect of further consolidating our customer base.
Semiconductor manufacturers generally must commit significant resources to qualify, install and integrate process control and yield management equipment into a semiconductor production line. We believe that once a semiconductor manufacturer selects a particular supplier’s process control and yield management equipment, the manufacturer generally relies upon that equipment for that specific production line application for an extended period of time. Accordingly, we expect it to be more difficult to sell our products to a given customer for that specific production line application and other similar production line applications if that customer initially selects a competitor’s equipment. Similarly, we expect it to be challenging for a competitor to sell its products to a given customer for a specific production line application if that customer initially selects our equipment.
Prices differ among the products we offer for different applications due to differences in features offered or manufacturing costs. If there is a shift in demand by our customers from our higher-priced to lower-priced products, our gross margin and revenue would decrease. In addition, when products are initially introduced, they tend to have higher costs because of initial development costs and lower production volumes relative to the previous product generation, which can impact gross margin.
Any of these factors could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and operating results.

TheWe operate in industries that have historically been cyclical, including the semiconductor equipment industry has been cyclical.industry. The purchasing decisions of our customers are highly dependent on the economies of both the local markets in which they are located and the semiconductorcondition of the industry worldwide. If we fail to respond to industry cycles, our business could be seriously harmed.
The timing, length and severity of the up-and-down cycles in the semiconductor equipment industryindustries in which we serve are difficult to predict. The historically cyclical nature of the primarysemiconductor industry in which we primarily operate is largely a function of our customers’ capital spending patterns and need for expanded manufacturing capacity, which in turn are affected by factors such as capacity utilization, consumer demand for products, inventory levels and our customers’ access to capital. Cyclicality affects our ability to accurately predict future revenue and, in some cases, future expense levels. During down cycles in our industry, the financial results of our customers may be negatively impacted, which could result not only in a decrease in, or cancellation or delay of, orders (which are generally subject to cancellation or delay by the customer with limited or no penalty) but also a weakening of their financial condition that could impair their ability to pay for our products or our ability to recognize revenue from certain customers. Our ability to recognize revenue from a particular customer may also be negatively impacted by the customer’s funding status, which could be weakened not only by adverse business conditions or inaccessibility to capital markets for any number of macroeconomic or company-specific reasons, but also by funding limitations imposed by the customer’s unique corporateorganizational structure. Any of these factors could negatively impact our business, operating results and financial condition.
When cyclical fluctuations result in lower than expected revenue levels, operating results may be adversely affected and cost reduction measures may be necessary in order for us to remain competitive and financially sound. During periods of declining revenues, we must be in a position to adjust our cost and expense structure to prevailing market conditions and to continue to motivate and retain our key employees. If we fail to respond, or if our attempts to respond fail to accomplish our intended results, then our business could be seriously harmed. Furthermore, any workforce reductions and cost reduction actions that we adopt in response to down cycles may result in additional restructuring charges, disruptions in our operations and loss of key personnel. In addition, during periods of rapid growth, we must be able to increase manufacturing capacity and personnel to meet customer demand. We can provide no assurance that these objectives can be met in a timely manner in response to industry cycles. Each of these factors could adversely impact our operating results and financial condition.
In addition, our management typically provides quarterly forecasts for certain financial metrics, which, when made, are based on business and operational forecasts that are believed to be reasonable at the time. However, largely due to the historical cyclicality of our business and the industries in which we operate, and the fact that business conditions in our industries can change very rapidly as part of these cycles, our actual results may vary (and have varied in the past) from forecasted results. These variations can occur for any number of reasons, including, but not limited to, unexpected changes in the volume or timing of customer orders, product shipments or product acceptances;acceptance; an inability to adjust our operations rapidly enough to adapt to changing business conditions; or a different than anticipated effective tax rate. The impact on our business of delays or cancellations of customer orders may be exacerbated by the short lead times that our customers expect between order placement and product shipment. This is because order delays and cancellations may lead not only to lower revenues, but also, due to the advance work we must do in anticipation of receiving a product order to meet the expected lead times, to significant inventory write-offs and manufacturing inefficiencies that decrease our gross margin. Any of these factors could materially and adversely affect our financial results for a particular quarter and could cause those results to differ materially from financial forecasts we have previously provided. We provide these forecasts with the intent of giving investors and analysts a better understanding of management’s expectations for the future, but those reviewing such forecasts must recognize that such forecasts are comprised of, and are themselves, forward-looking statements subject to the risks and uncertainties described in this Item 1A and elsewhere in this report and in our other public filings and public statements. If our operating or financial results for a particular period differ from our forecasts or the expectations of investment analysts, or if we revise our forecasts, the market price of our common stock could decline.

Risks Related to Our Business Model and Capital Structure
If we do not develop and introduce new products and technologies in a timely manner in response to changing market conditions or customer requirements, our business could be seriously harmed.
Success in the industries in which we serve, including the semiconductor, equipment industryflat panel display and printed circuit board industries depends, in part, on continual improvement of existing technologies and rapid innovation of new solutions. The primary driver of technology advancement in the semiconductor industry has been to shrink the lithography that prints the circuit design on semiconductor chips. That driver appears to be slowing, which may cause semiconductor manufacturers to delay investments in equipment, investigate more complex device architectures, use new materials and develop innovative fabrication processes. These and other evolving customer plans and needs require us to respond with continued development programs and cut back or discontinue older programs, which may no longer have industry-wide support. Technical innovations are inherently complex and require long development cycles and appropriate staffing of highly qualified employees. Our competitive advantage and future business success depend on our ability to accurately predict evolving industry standards, develop and introduce new products and solutions that successfully address changing customer needs, win market acceptance of these new products and solutions, and manufacture these new products in a timely and cost-effective manner. Our failure to accurately predict evolving industry standards and develop as well as offer competitive technology solutions in a timely manner with cost-effective products could result in loss of market share, unanticipated costs, and inventory obsolescence, which would adversely impact our business, operating results and financial condition.
We must continue to make significant investments in research and development in order to enhance the performance, features and functionality of our products, to keep pace with competitive products and to satisfy customer demands. Substantial research and development costs typically are incurred before we confirm the technical feasibility and commercial viability of a new product, and not all development activities result in commercially viable products. There can be no assurance that revenues from future products or product enhancements will be sufficient to recover the development costs associated with such products or enhancements. In addition, we cannot be sure that these products or enhancements will receive market acceptance or that we will be able to sell these products at prices that are favorable to us. Our business will be seriously harmed if we are unable to sell our products at favorable prices or if the market in which we operate does not accept our products.
In addition, the complexity of our products exposes us to other risks. We regularly recognize revenue from a sale upon shipment of the applicable product to the customer (even before receiving the customer’s formal acceptance of that product) in certain situations, including sales of products for which installation is considered perfunctory, transactions in which the product is sold to an independent distributor and we have no installation obligations, and sales of products where we have previously delivered the same product to the same customer location and that prior delivery has been accepted. However, our products are very technologically complex and rely on the interconnection of numerous subcomponents (all of which must perform to their respective specifications), so it is conceivable that a product for which we recognize revenue upon shipment may ultimately fail to meet the overall product’s required specifications. In such a situation, the customer may be entitled to certain remedies, which could materially and adversely affect our operating results for various periods and, as a result, our stock price.
We derive a substantial percentage of our revenues from sales of inspection products. As a result, any delay or reduction of sales of these products could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and operating results. The continued customer demand for these products and the development, introduction and market acceptance of new products and technologies are critical to our future success.
Our success is dependent in part on our technology and other proprietary rights. If we are unable to maintain our lead or protect our proprietary technology, we may lose valuable assets.
Our success is dependent in part on our technology and other proprietary rights. We own various United States and international patents and have additional pending patent applications relating to some of our products and technologies. The process of seeking patent protection is lengthy and expensive, and we cannot be certain that pending or future applications will actually result in issued patents or that issued patents will be of sufficient scope or strength to provide meaningful protection or commercial advantage to us. Other companies and individuals, including our larger competitors, may develop technologies and obtain patents relating to our business that are similar or superior to our technology or may design around the patents we own, which may adversely affectingaffect our business. In addition, we at times engage in collaborative technology development efforts with our customers and suppliers, and these collaborations may constitute a key component of certain of our ongoing technology and product research and development projects. The termination of any such collaboration, or delays caused by disputes or other unanticipated challenges that may arise in connection with any such collaboration, could significantly impair our research and development efforts, which could have a material adverse impact on our business and operations.

We also maintain trademarks on certain of our products and services and claim copyright protection for certain proprietary software and documentation. However, we can give no assurance that our trademarks and copyrights will be upheld or successfully deter infringement by third parties.
While patent, copyright and trademark protection for our intellectual property is important, we believe our future success in highly dynamic markets is most dependent upon the technical competence and creative skills of our personnel. We attempt to protect our trade secrets and other proprietary information through confidentiality and other agreements with our customers, suppliers, employees and consultants and through other security measures. We also maintain exclusive and non-exclusive licenses with third parties for strategic technology used in certain products. However, these employees, consultants and third parties may breach these agreements, and we may not have adequate remedies for wrongdoing. In addition, the laws of certain territories in which we develop, manufacture or sell our products may not protect our intellectual property rights to the same extent as do the laws of the United States. In any event, the extent to which we can protect our trade secrets through the use of confidentiality agreements is limited, and our success will depend to a significant extent on our ability to innovate ahead of our competitors.
Our future performance depends, in part, upon our ability to continue to compete successfully worldwide.
Our industry includes large manufacturers with substantial resources to support customers worldwide. Some of our competitors are diversified companies with greater financial resources and more extensive research, engineering, manufacturing, marketing, and customer service and support capabilities than we possess. We face competition from companies whose strategy is to provide a broad array of products and services, some of which compete with the products and services that we offer. These competitors may bundle their products in a manner that may discourage customers from purchasing our products, including pricing such competitive tools significantly below our product offerings. In addition, we face competition from smaller emerging semiconductor equipment companies whose strategy is to provide a portion of the products and services that we offer, using innovative technology to sell products into specialized markets. The strength of our competitive positions in many of our existing markets is largely due to our leading technology, which is the result of continuing significant investments in product research and development. However, we may enter new markets, whether through acquisitions or new internal product development, in which competition is based primarily on product pricing, not technological superiority. Further, some new growth markets that emerge may not require leading technologies. Loss of competitive position in any of the markets we serve, or an inability to sell our products on favorable commercial terms in new markets we may enter, could negatively affect our prices, customer orders, revenues, gross margins and market share, any of which would negatively affect our operating results and financial condition.
Our business would be harmed if we do not receive parts sufficient in number and performance to meet our production requirements and product specifications in a timely and cost-effective manner.
We use a wide range of materials in the production of our products, including custom electronic and mechanical components, and we use numerous suppliers to supply these materials. We generally do not have guaranteed supply arrangements with our suppliers. Because of the variability and uniqueness of customers’ orders, we do not maintain an extensive inventory of materials for manufacturing. Through our business interruption planning, we seek to minimize the risk of production and service interruptions and/or shortages of key parts by, among other things, monitoring the financial stability of key suppliers, identifying (but not necessarily qualifying) possible alternative suppliers and maintaining appropriate inventories of key parts. Although we make reasonable efforts to ensure that parts are available from multiple suppliers, certain key parts are available only from a single supplier or a limited group of suppliers. Also, key parts we obtain from some of our suppliers incorporate the suppliers’ proprietary intellectual property; in those cases we are increasingly reliant on third parties for high-performance, high-technology components, which reduces the amount of control we have over the availability and protection of the technology and intellectual property that is used in our products. In addition, if certain of our key suppliers experience liquidity issues and are forced to discontinue operations, which is a heightened risk especially during economic downturns, it could affect their ability to deliver parts and could result in delays for our products. Similarly, especially with respect to suppliers of high-technology components, our suppliers themselves have increasingly complex supply chains, and delays or disruptions at any stage of their supply chains may prevent us from obtaining parts in a timely manner and result in delays for our products. Our operating results and business may be adversely impacted if we are unable to obtain parts to meet our production requirements and product specifications, or if we are only able to do so on unfavorable terms. Furthermore, a supplier may discontinue production of a particular part for any number of reasons, including the supplier’s financial condition or business operational decisions, which would require us to purchase, in a single transaction, a large number of such discontinued parts in order to ensure that a continuous supply of such parts remains available to our customers. Such “end-of-life” parts purchases could result in significant expenditures by us in a particular period, and ultimately any unused parts may result in a significant inventory write-off, either of which could have an adverse impact on our financial condition and results of operations for the applicable periods.

If we fail to operate our business in accordance with our business plan, our operating results, business and stock price may be significantly and adversely impacted.
We attempt to operate our business in accordance with a business plan that is established annually, revised frequently (generally quarterly), and reviewed by management even more frequently (at least monthly). Our business plan is developed based on a number of factors, many of which require estimates and assumptions, such as our expectations of the economic environment, future business levels, our customers’ willingness and ability to place orders, lead-times, and future revenue and cash flow. Our budgeted operating expenses, for example, are based in part on our future revenue expectations. However, our ability to achieve our anticipated revenue levels is a function of numerous factors, including the volatile and historically cyclical nature of our primary industry, customer order cancellations, macroeconomic changes, operational matters regarding particular agreements, our ability to manage customer deliveries, the availability of resources for the installation of our products, delays or accelerations by customers in taking deliveries and the acceptance of our products (for products where customer acceptance is required before we can recognize revenue from such sales), our ability to operate our business and sales processes effectively, and a number of the other risk factors set forth in this Item 1A.
Because our expenses are in most cases relatively fixed in the short term, any revenue shortfall below expectations could have an immediate and significant adverse effect on our operating results. Similarly, if we fail to manage our expenses effectively or otherwise fail to maintain rigorous cost controls, we could experience greater than anticipated expenses during an operating period, which would also negatively affect our results of operations. If we fail to operate our business consistent with our business plan, our operating results in any period may be significantly and adversely impacted. Such an outcome could cause customers, suppliers or investors to view us as less stable, or could cause us to fail to meet financial analysts’ revenue or earnings estimates, any of which could have an adverse impact on our stock price.
In addition, our management is constantly striving to balance the requirements and demands of our customers with the availability of resources, the need to manage our operating model and other factors. In furtherance of those efforts, we often must exercise discretion and judgment as to the timing and prioritization of manufacturing, deliveries, installations and payment scheduling. Any such decisions may impact our ability to recognize revenue, including the fiscal period during which such revenue may be recognized, with respect to such products, which could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations or stock price.
OurWe have a leveraged capital structure is highly leveraged.structure.
As of June 30, 2017,2019, we had $2.95 billion aggregate principal amount of outstanding indebtedness, consisting of $2.50$3.45 billion aggregate principal amount of senior, unsecured long-term notes and $446.3 million of term loans under a Credit Agreement (the “Credit Agreement”).notes. Additionally, we have commitments for an unfunded revolving credit facilityRevolving Credit Facility of $500.0 million$1.00 billion under the Credit Agreement. We may incur additional indebtedness in the future by accessing the unfunded revolving credit facility under theportion of our Revolving Credit AgreementFacility and/or entering into new financing arrangements. For example, at the same time we announced our intention to acquire Orbotech, we also announced a new stock repurchase program authorizing the repurchase up to $2.00 billion of our common stock, a large portion of which would be financed with new indebtedness. Our ability to pay interest and repay the principal of our current indebtedness is dependent upon our ability to manage our business operations, our credit rating, the ongoing interest rate environment and the other risk factors discussed in this section. There can be no assurance that we will be able to manage any of these risks successfully.
In addition, the interest rates of the senior, unsecured long-term notes may be subject to adjustments from time to time if Moody’s Investors Service, Inc. (“Moody’s”), Standard & Poor’s Ratings Services (“S&P”) or, under certain circumstances, a substitute rating agency selected by us as a replacement for Moody’s or S&P, as the case may be (a “Substitute Rating Agency”), downgrades (or subsequently upgrades) its rating assigned to the respective series of notes such that the adjusted rating is below investment grade. Accordingly, changes by Moody’s, S&P, or a Substitute Rating Agency to the rating of any series of notes, our outlook or credit rating could require us to pay additional interest, which may negatively affect the value and liquidity of our debt and the market price of our common stock could decline. Factors that can affect our credit rating include changes in our operating performance, the economic environment, conditions in the semiconductor and semiconductor equipment industries we serve, our financial position, including the incurrence of additional indebtedness, and our business strategy.

In certain circumstances involving a change of control followed by a downgrade of the rating of a series of notes by at least two of Moody’s, S&P and Fitch Inc., unless we have exercised our right to redeem the notes of such series, we will be required to make an offer to repurchase all or, at the holder’s option, any part, of each holder’s notes of that series pursuant to the offer described below (the “Change of Control Offer”). In the Change of Control Offer, we will be required to offer payment in cash equal to 101% of the aggregate principal amount of notes repurchased plus accrued and unpaid interest, if any, on the notes repurchased, up to, but not including, the date of repurchase. We cannot make any assurance that we will have sufficient financial resources at such time or will be able to arrange financing to pay the repurchase price of that series of notes. Our ability to repurchase that series of notes in such event may be limited by law, by the indenture associated with that series of notes, or by the terms of other agreements to which we may be party at such time. If we fail to repurchase that series of notes as required by the terms of such notes, it would constitute an event of default under the indenture governing that series of notes which, in turn, may also constitute an event of default under other of our obligations.
The term loansBorrowings under theour Revolving Credit AgreementFacility bear interest at a floating rate, which is based on the London Interbank Offered Rate plus a fixed spread, and therefore, anyan increase in interest rates would require us to pay additional interest on any borrowings, which may have an adverse effect on the value and liquidity of our debt and the market price of our common stock could decline. The interest rate under theour Revolving Credit Facility is also subject to an adjustment in conjunction with our credit rating downgrades or upgrades. Additionally, under theour Revolving Credit Agreement,Facility, we are required to comply with affirmative and negative covenants, which include the maintenance of certain financial ratios, the details of which can be found in Note 7, “Debt”8, “Debt,” to the consolidated financial statements.our Consolidated Financial Statements.
If we fail to comply with these covenants, we will be in default and our borrowings will become immediately due and payable. There can be no assurance that we will have sufficient financial resources or we will be able to arrange financing to repay our borrowings at such time. In addition, certain of our domestic subsidiaries under the Credit Agreement are required to guarantee our borrowings under theour Revolving Credit Agreement.Facility. In the event that we default on our borrowings, these domestic subsidiaries shall be liable for our borrowings, which could disrupt our operations and result in a material adverse impact on our business, financial condition or stock price.
Our leveraged capital structure may adversely affect our financial condition, results of operations and net income per share.
Our issuance and maintenance of higher levels of indebtedness could have adverse consequences including, but not limited to:
a negative impact on our ability to satisfy our future obligations;
an increase in the portion of our cash flows that may have to be dedicated to increased interest and principal payments that may not be available for operations, working capital, capital expenditures, acquisitions, investments, dividends, stock repurchases, general corporate or other purposes;
an impairment of our ability to obtain additional financing in the future; and
obligations to comply with restrictive and financial covenants as noted in the above risk factor and Note 7, “Debt”8, “Debt,” to the consolidated financial statements.our Consolidated Financial Statements.
Our ability to satisfy our future expenses as well as our new debt obligations will depend on our future performance, which will be affected by financial, business, economic, regulatory and other factors. Furthermore, our future operations may not generate sufficient cash flows to enable us to meet our future expenses and service our new debt obligations, which may impact our ability to manage our capital structure to preserve and maintain our investment grade rating. If our future operations do not generate sufficient cash flows, we may need to access the unfunded revolving credit facility of $500.0 millionmoney available for borrowing under theour Revolving Credit AgreementFacility or enter into new financing arrangements to obtain necessary funds. If we determine it is necessary to seek additional funding for any reason, we may not be able to obtain such funding or, if funding is available, we may not be able to obtain it on acceptable terms. Any additional borrowingborrowings under theour Revolving Credit AgreementFacility will place further pressure on us to comply with the financial covenants. If we fail to make a payment associated with our debt obligations, we could be in default on such debt, and such a default could cause us to be in default on our other obligations.

There can be no assurance that we will continue to declare cash dividends at all or in any particular amounts.
Our Board of Directors first instituted a quarterly dividend during the fiscal year ended June 30, 2005. Since that time, we have announced a number of increases in the amount of our quarterly dividend level as well as payment of a special cash dividend that was declared and substantially paid in the second quarter of our fiscal year ended June 30, 2015. We intend to continue to pay quarterly dividends subject to capital availability and periodic determinations by our Board of Directors that cash dividends are in the best interest of our stockholders and are in compliance with all laws and agreements applicable to the declaration and payment of cash dividends by us. Future dividends may be affected by, among other factors: our views on potential future capital requirements for investments in acquisitions and the funding of our research and development; legal risks; stock repurchase programs; changes in federal and state income tax laws or corporate laws; changes to our business model; and our increased interest and principal payments required by our outstanding indebtedness and any additional indebtedness that we may incur in the future. Our dividend payments may change from time to time, and we cannot provide assurance that we will continue to declare dividends at all or in any particular amounts. A reduction in our dividend payments could have a negative effect on our stock price.
We are exposed to risks related to our commercial terms and conditions, including our indemnification of third parties, as well as the performance of our products.
Although our standard commercial documentation sets forth the terms and conditions that we intend to apply to commercial transactions with our business partners, counterparties to such transactions may not explicitly agree to our terms and conditions. In situations where we engage in business with a third party without an explicit master agreement regarding the applicable terms and conditions, or where the commercial documentation applicable to the transaction is subject to varying interpretations, we may have disputes with those third parties regarding the applicable terms and conditions of our business relationship with them. Such disputes could lead to a deterioration of our commercial relationship with those parties, costly and time-consuming litigation, or additional concessions or obligations being offered by us to resolve such disputes, or could impact our revenue or cost recognition. Any of these outcomes could materially and adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.
In addition, in our commercial agreements, from time to time in the normal course of business we indemnify third parties with whom we enter into contractual relationships, including customers, suppliers and lessors, with respect to certain matters. We have agreed, under certain conditions, to hold these third parties harmless against specified losses, such as those arising from a breach of representations or covenants, other third party claims that our products when used for their intended purposes infringe the intellectual property rights of such other third parties, or other claims made against certain parties. We may be compelled to enter into or accrue for probable settlements of alleged indemnification obligations, or we may be subject to potential liability arising from our customers’ involvements in legal disputes. In addition, notwithstanding the provisions related to limitations on our liability that we seek to include in our business agreements, the counterparties to such agreements may dispute our interpretation or application of such provisions, and a court of law may not interpret or apply such provisions in our favor, any of which could result in an obligation for us to pay material damages to third parties and engage in costly legal proceedings. It is difficult to determine the maximum potential amount of liability under any indemnification obligations, whether or not asserted, due to our limited history of prior indemnification claims and the unique facts and circumstances that are likely to be involved in any particular claim. Our business, financial condition and results of operations in a reported fiscal period could be materially and adversely affected if we expend significant amounts in defending or settling any purported claims, regardless of their merit or outcomes.
We are also exposed to potential costs associated with unexpected product performance issues. Our products and production processes are extremely complex and thus could contain unexpected product defects, especially when products are first introduced. Unexpected product performance issues could result in significant costs being incurred by us, including increased service or warranty costs, providing product replacements for (or modifications to) defective products, litigation related to defective products, reimbursement for damages caused by our products, product recalls, or product write-offs or disposal costs. These costs could be substantial and could have an adverse impact upon our business, financial condition and operating results. In addition, our reputation with our customers could be damaged as a result of such product defects, which could reduce demand for our products and negatively impact our business.

Furthermore, we occasionally enter into volume purchase agreements with our larger customers, and these agreements may provide for certain volume purchase incentives, such as credits toward future purchases. We believe that these arrangements are beneficial to our long-term business, as they are designed to encourage our customers to purchase higher volumes of our products. However, these arrangements could require us to recognize a reduced level of revenue for the products that are initially purchased, to account for the potential future credits or other volume purchase incentives. Our volume purchase agreements require significant estimation for the amounts to be accrued depending upon the estimate of volume of future purchases. As such, we are required to update our estimates of the accruals on a periodic basis. Until the earnings process is complete, our estimates could differ in comparison to actuals.actual results. As a result, these volume purchase arrangements, while expected to be beneficial to our business over time, could materially and adversely affect our results of operations in near-term periods, including the revenue we can recognize on product sales and therefore our gross margins.
In addition, we may, in limited circumstances, enter into agreements that contain customer-specific commitments on pricing, tool reliability, spare parts stocking levels, response time and other commitments. Furthermore, we may give these customers limited audit or inspection rights to enable them to confirm that we are complying with these commitments. If a customer elects to exercise its audit or inspection rights, we may be required to expend significant resources to support the audit or inspection, as well as to defend or settle any dispute with a customer that could potentially arise out of such audit or inspection. To date, we have made no significant accruals in our consolidated financial statementsConsolidated Financial Statements for this contingency. While we have not in the past incurred significant expenses for resolving disputes regarding these types of commitments, we cannot make any assurance that we will not incur any such liabilities in the future. Our business, financial condition and results of operations in a reported fiscal period could be materially and adversely affected if we expend significant amounts in supporting an audit or inspection, or defending or settling any purported claims, regardless of their merit or outcomes.
There are risks associated with our receipt of government funding for research and development.
We are exposed to additional risks related to our receipt of external funding for certain strategic development programs from various governments and government agencies, both domestically and internationally. Governments and government agencies typically have the right to terminate funding programs at any time in their sole discretion, or a project may be terminated by mutual agreement if the parties determine that the project’s goals or milestones are not being achieved, so there is no assurance that these sources of external funding will continue to be available to us in the future. In addition, under the terms of these government grants, the applicable granting agency typically has the right to audit the costs that we incur, directly and indirectly, in connection with such programs. Any such audit could result in modifications to, or even termination of, the applicable government funding program. For example, if an audit were to identify any costs as being improperly allocated to the applicable program, those costs would not be reimbursed, and any such costs that had already been reimbursed would have to be refunded. We do not know the outcome of any future audits. Any adverse finding resulting from any such audit could lead to penalties (financial or otherwise), termination of funding programs, suspension of payments, fines and suspension or prohibition from receiving future government funding from the applicable government or government agency, any of which could adversely impact our operating results, financial condition and ability to operate our business.
We have recorded significant restructuring, inventory write-off and asset impairment charges in the past and may do so again in the future, which could have a material negative impact on our business.
Historically, we have recorded material restructuring charges related to our prior global workforce reductions, large excess inventory write-offs, and material impairment charges related to our goodwill and purchased intangible assets. During the fourth quarter of fiscal year ended 2015, we implemented a plan to reduce our global employee workforce to streamline our organization and business processes in response to changing customer requirements in our industry. We substantially completed the global employee workforce reduction during the fiscal year ended June 30, 2016. Such workforceWorkforce changes can also temporarily reduce workforce productivity, which could be disruptive to our business and adversely affect our results of operations. In addition, we may not achieve or sustain the expected cost savings or other benefits of our restructuring plans, or do so within the expected time frame. If we again restructure our organization and business processes, implement additional cost reduction actions or discontinue certain business operations, we may take additional, potentially material, restructuring charges related to, among other things, employee terminations or exit costs. We may also be required to write-off additional inventory if our product build plans or usage of service inventory decline. Also, as our lead times from suppliers increase (due to the increasing complexity of the parts and components they provide) and the lead times demanded by our customers decrease (due to the time pressures they face when introducing new products or technology or bringing new facilities into production), we may be compelled to increase our commitments, and therefore our risk exposure, to inventory purchases to meet our customers’ demands in a timely manner, and that inventory may need to be written-off if demand for the underlying product declines for any reason. Such additional write-offs could constituteresult in material charges.

In the past, we have recorded a material chargecharges related to the impairment of our goodwill and purchased intangible assets. Goodwill represents the excess of costs over the net fair value of net assets acquired in a business combination. Goodwill is not amortized, but is instead tested for impairment at least annually in accordance with authoritative guidance for goodwill. Purchased intangible assets with estimable useful lives are amortized over their respective estimated useful lives based on economic benefit if known or using the straight-line method, and are reviewed for impairment in accordance with authoritative guidance for long-lived assets. The valuation of goodwill and intangible assets requires assumptions and estimates of many critical factors, including revenue and market growth, operating cash flows, market multiples, and discount rates. A substantial decline in our stock price, or any other adverse change in market conditions, particularly if such change has the effect of changing one of the critical assumptions or estimates we previously used to calculate the value of our goodwill or intangible assets (and, as applicable, the amount of any previous impairment charge), could result in a change to the estimation of fair value that could result in an additional impairment charge.
Any such additional material charges, whether related to restructuring or goodwill or purchased intangible asset impairment, may have a material negative impact on our operating results and related financial statements.
We are exposed to risks related to our financial arrangements with respect to receivables factoring and banking arrangements.
We enter into factoring arrangements with financial institutions to sell certain of our trade receivables and promissory notes from customers without recourse. In addition, we maintain bank accounts with several domestic and foreign financial institutions, any of which may prove not to be financially viable. If we were to stop entering into these factoring arrangements, our operating results, financial condition and cash flows could be adversely impacted by delays or failures in collecting trade receivables. However, by entering into these arrangements, and by engaging these financial institutions for banking services, we are exposed to additional risks. If any of these financial institutions experiences financial difficulties or is otherwise unable to honor the terms of our factoring or deposit arrangements, we may experience material financial losses due to the failure of such arrangements or a lack of access to our funds, any of which could have an adverse impact upon our operating results, financial condition and cash flows.
We are subject to the risks of additional government actions in the event we were to breach the terms of any settlement arrangement into which we have entered.
In connection with the settlement of certain government actions and other legal proceedings related to our historical stock option practices, we have explicitly agreed as a condition to such settlements that we will comply with certain laws, such as the books and records provisions of the federal securities laws. If we were to violate any such law, we might not only be subject to the significant penalties applicable to such violation, but our past settlements may also be impacted by such violation, which could give rise to additional government actions or other legal proceedings. Any such additional actions or proceedings may require us to expend significant management time and incur significant accounting, legal and other expenses, and may divert attention and resources from the operation of our business. These expenditures and diversions, as well as an adverse resolution of any such action or proceeding, could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.
General Commercial, Operational, Financial and Regulatory Risks
A majority of our annual revenues are derived from outside the United States, and we maintain significant operations outside the United States. We are exposed to numerous risks as a result of the international nature of our business and operations.
A majority of our annual revenues are derived from outside the United States, and we maintain significant operations outside the United States. We expect that these conditions will continue in the foreseeable future. Managing global operations and sites located throughout the world presents a number of challenges, including but not limited to:
managing cultural diversity and organizational alignment;
exposure to the unique characteristics of each region in the global market, which can cause capital equipment investment patterns to vary significantly from period to period;
periodic local or international economic downturns;
potential adverse tax consequences, including withholding tax rules that may limit the repatriation of our earnings, and higher effective income tax rates in foreign countries where we do business;
compliance with customs regulations in the countries in which we do business;
tariffs or other trade barriers (including those applied to our products or to parts and supplies that we purchase);
political instability, natural disasters, legal or regulatory changes, acts of war or terrorism in regions where we have operations or where we do business;

fluctuations in interest and currency exchange rates may adversely impact our ability to compete on price with local providers or the value of revenues we generate from our international business. Although we attempt to manage some of our near-term currency risks through the use of hedging instruments, there can be no assurance that such efforts will be adequate;
longer payment cycles and difficulties in collecting accounts receivable outside of the United States;
difficulties in managing foreign distributors (including monitoring and ensuring our distributors’ compliance with applicable laws); and
inadequate protection or enforcement of our intellectual property and other legal rights in foreign jurisdictions.
In addition, government controls, either by the United States or other countries, that restrict our business overseas or the import or export of our products or increase the cost of our operations through the imposition of tariffs or otherwise, could harm our business. For example, effective on October 30, 2018, the United States Department of Commerce added Fujian Jinhua Integrated Circuit Company, Ltd. (“JHICC”) to its entity list, restricting exports of technology to JHICC without a license. As a result, unless JHICC is subsequently removed from the entity list, we will be unable to fulfill orders JHICC has made for our products, accept future orders placed by JHICC for our products, and provide services for any of our products already installed at JHICC.
Any of the factors above could have a significant negative impact on our business and results of operations.
We are exposed to risks associated with a weakening in the condition of the financial markets and the global economy.
The marketsDemand for semiconductors, and therefore our business, areproducts is ultimately driven by the global demand for electronic devices by consumers and businesses. Economic uncertainty frequently leads to reduced consumer and business spending, which caused our customers to decrease, cancel or delay their equipment and service orders from us in the economic slowdown during fiscal year 2009. In addition, the tightening of credit markets and concerns regarding the availability of credit that accompanied that slowdown made it more difficult for our customers to raise capital, whether debt or equity, to finance their purchases of capital equipment, including the products we sell. Reduced demand, combined with delays in our customers’ ability to obtain financing (or the unavailability of such financing), has at times in the past adversely affected our product and service sales and revenues and therefore has harmed our business and operating results, and our operating results and financial condition may again be adversely impacted if economic conditions decline from their current levels.

In addition, a decline in the condition of the global financial markets could adversely impact the market values or liquidity of our investments. Our investment portfolio includes corporate and government securities, money market funds and other types of debt and equity investments. Although we believe our portfolio continues to be comprised of sound investments due to the quality and (where applicable) credit ratings, a decline in the capital and financial markets would adversely impact the market value of our investments and their liquidity. If the market value of such investments were to decline, or if we were to have to sell some of our investments under illiquid market conditions, we may be required to recognize an impairment charge on such investments or a loss on such sales, either of which could have an adverse effect on our financial condition and operating results.
If we are unable to timely and appropriately adapt to changes resulting from difficult macroeconomic conditions, our business, financial condition or results of operations may be materially and adversely affected.
A majority of our annual revenues are derived from outside the United States, and we maintain significant operations outside the United States. We are exposed to numerous risks as a result of the international nature of our business and operations.
A majority of our annual revenues are derived from outside the United States, and we maintain significant operations outside the United States. We expect that these conditions will continue in the foreseeable future. Managing global operations and sites located throughout the world presents a number of challenges, including but not limited to:
managing cultural diversity and organizational alignment;
exposure to the unique characteristics of each region in the global semiconductor market, which can cause capital equipment investment patterns to vary significantly from period to period;
periodic local or international economic downturns;
potential adverse tax consequences, including withholding tax rules that may limit the repatriation of our earnings, and higher effective income tax rates in foreign countries where we do business;
government controls, either by the United States or other countries, that restrict our business overseas or the import or export of semiconductor products or increase the cost of our operations;
compliance with customs regulations in the countries in which we do business;
tariffs or other trade barriers (including those applied to our products or to parts and supplies that we purchase);
political instability, natural disasters, legal or regulatory changes, acts of war or terrorism in regions where we have operations or where we do business;

fluctuations in interest and currency exchange rates may adversely impact our ability to compete on price with local providers or the value of revenues we generate from our international business. Although we attempt to manage some of our near-term currency risks through the use of hedging instruments, there can be no assurance that such efforts will be adequate;
longer payment cycles and difficulties in collecting accounts receivable outside of the United States;
difficulties in managing foreign distributors (including monitoring and ensuring our distributors’ compliance with applicable laws); and
inadequate protection or enforcement of our intellectual property and other legal rights in foreign jurisdictions.
Any of the factors above could have a significant negative impact on our business and results of operations.

We might be involved in claims or disputes related to intellectual property or other confidential information that may be costly to resolve, prevent us from selling or using the challenged technology and seriously harm our operating results and financial condition.
As is typical in the semiconductor equipment industry,industries in which we serve, from time to time we have received communications from other parties asserting the existence of patent rights, copyrights, trademark rights or other intellectual property rights which they believe cover certain of our products, processes, technologies or information. In addition, we occasionally receive notification from customers who believe that we owe them indemnification or other obligations related to intellectual property claims made against such customers by third parties. With respect to intellectual property infringement disputes, our customary practice is to evaluate such infringement assertions and to consider whether to seek licenses where appropriate. However, we cannot ensurethere can be no assurance that licenses can be obtained or, if obtained, will be on acceptable terms or that costly litigation or other administrative proceedings will not occur. The inability to obtain necessary licenses or other rights on reasonable terms could seriously harm our results of operations and financial condition. Furthermore, we may potentially be subject to claims by customers, suppliers or other business partners, or by governmental law enforcement agencies, related to our receipt, distribution and/or use of third-party intellectual property or confidential information. Legal proceedings and claims, regardless of their merit, and associated internal investigations with respect to intellectual property or confidential information disputes are often expensive to prosecute, defend or conduct; may divert management’s attention and other company resources; and/or may result in restrictions on our ability to sell our products, settlements on significantly adverse terms or adverse judgments for damages, injunctive relief, penalties and fines, any of which could have a significant negative effect on our business, results of operations and financial condition. There can be no assurance regarding the outcome of future legal proceedings, claims or investigations. The instigation of legal proceedings or claims, our inability to favorably resolve or settle such proceedings or claims, or the determination of any adverse findings against us or any of our employees in connection with such proceedings or claims could materially and adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations, as well as our business reputation.
We are exposed to various risks related to the legal, regulatory and tax environments in which we perform our operations and conduct our business.
We are subject to various risks related to compliance with new, existing, different, inconsistent or even conflicting laws, rules and regulations enacted by legislative bodies and/or regulatory agencies in the countries in which we operate and with which we must comply, including environmental, safety, antitrust, anti-corruption/anti-bribery, unclaimed property and export control regulations. Our failure or inability to comply with existing or future laws, rules or regulations, or changes to existing laws, rules or regulations (including changes that result in inconsistent or conflicting laws, rules or regulations), in the countries in which we operate could result in violations of contractual or regulatory obligations that may adversely affect our operating results, financial condition and ability to conduct our business. From time to time, we may receive inquiries or audit notices from governmental or regulatory bodies, or we may participate in voluntary disclosure programs, related to legal, regulatory or tax compliance matters, and these inquiries, notices or programs may result in significant financial cost (including investigation expenses, defense costs, assessments and penalties), reputational harm and other consequences that could materially and adversely affect our operating results and financial condition.
Our properties and many aspects of our business operations are subject to various domestic and international environmental laws and regulations, including those that control and restrict the use, transportation, emission, discharge, storage and disposal of certain chemicals, gases and other substances. Any failure to comply with applicable environmental laws, regulations or requirements may subject us to a range of consequences, including fines, suspension of certain of our business activities, limitations on our ability to sell our products, obligations to remediate environmental contamination, and criminal and civil liabilities or other sanctions. In addition, changes in environmental regulations (including regulations relating to climate change and greenhouse gas emissions) could require us to invest in potentially costly pollution control equipment, alter our manufacturing processes or use substitute (potentially more expensive and/or rarer) materials. Further, we use hazardous and other regulated materials that subject us to risks of strict liability for damages caused by any release, regardless of fault. We also face increasing complexity in our manufacturing, product design and procurement operations as we adjust to new and prospective requirements relating to the materials composition of our products, including restrictions on lead and other substances and requirements to track the sources of certain metals and other materials. The cost of complying, or of failing to comply, with these and other regulatory restrictions or contractual obligations could adversely affect our operating results, financial condition and ability to conduct our business.

In addition, we may from time to time be involved in legal proceedings or claims regarding employment, immigration, contracts, product performance, product liability, antitrust, environmental regulations, securities, unfair competition and other matters (in addition to proceedings and claims related to intellectual property matters, which are separately discussed elsewhere in this Item 1A).matters. These legal proceedings and claims, regardless of their merit, may be time-consuming and expensive to prosecute or defend, divert management’s attention and resources, and/or inhibit our ability to sell our products. There can be no assurance regarding the outcome of current or future legal proceedings or claims, which could adversely affect our operating results, financial condition and ability to operate our business.
We depend on key personnel to manage our business effectively, and if we are unable to attract, retain and motivate our key employees, our sales and product development could be harmed.
Our employees are vital to our success, and our key management, engineering and other employees are difficult to replace. We generally do not have employment contracts with our key employees. Further, we do not maintain key person life insurance on any of our employees. The expansion of high technology companies worldwide has increased demand and competition for qualified personnel. If we are unable to attract and retain key personnel, or if we are not able to attract, assimilate and retain additional highly qualified employees to meet our current and future needs, our business and operations could be harmed.
We outsource a number of services to third-party service providers, which decreases our control over the performance of these functions. Disruptions or delays at our third-party service providers could adversely impact our operations.
We outsource a number of services, including our transportation, information systems management and logistics management of spare parts and certain accounting and procurement functions, to domestic and overseas third-party service providers. While outsourcing arrangements may lower our cost of operations, they also reduce our direct control over the services rendered. It is uncertain what effect such diminished control will have on the quality or quantity of products delivered or services rendered, on our ability to quickly respond to changing market conditions, or on our ability to ensure compliance with all applicable domestic and foreign laws and regulations. In addition, many of these outsourced service providers, including certain hosted software applications that we use for confidential data storage, employ cloud computing technology for such storage. These providers’ cloud computing systems may be susceptible to “cyber incidents,” such as intentional cyber attacks aimed at theft of sensitive data or inadvertent cyber-security compromises, which are outside of our control. If we do not effectively develop and manage our outsourcing strategies, if required export and other governmental approvals are not timely obtained, if our third-party service providers do not perform as anticipated or do not adequately protect our data from cyber-related security breaches, or if there are delays or difficulties in enhancing business processes, we may experience operational difficulties (such as limitations on our ability to ship products), increased costs, manufacturing or service interruptions or delays, loss of intellectual property rights or other sensitive data, quality and compliance issues, and challenges in managing our product inventory or recording and reporting financial and management information, any of which could materially and adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.
We are exposed to risks related to cybersecurity threats and cyber incidents.
In the conduct of our business, we collect, use, transmit and store data on information systems. This data includes confidential information, transactional information and intellectual property belonging to us, our customers and our business partners, as well as personally-identifiable information of individuals. We allocate significant resources to network security, data encryption and other measures to protect our information systems and data from unauthorized access or misuse. Despite our ongoing efforts to enhance our network security measures, our information systems are susceptible to computer viruses, cyber-related security breaches and similar disruptions from unauthorized intrusions, tampering, misuse, criminal acts, including phishing, or other events or developments that we may be unable to anticipate or fail to mitigate and are subject to the inherent vulnerabilities of network security measures. We have experienced cyber-related attacks in the past, and may experience cyber-related attacks in the future. Our security measures may also be breached due to employee errors, malfeasance, or otherwise. Third parties may also attempt to influence employees, users, suppliers or customers to disclose sensitive information in order to gain access to our, our customers’ or business partners’ data. Because the techniques used to obtain unauthorized access to the information systems change frequently, and may not be recognized until launched against a target, we may be unable to anticipate these techniques or to implement adequate preventative measures.
Any of such occurrences could result in disruptions to our operations; misappropriation, corruption or theft of confidential information, including intellectual property and other critical data, of KLA-Tencor,KLA, our customers and other business partners; misappropriation of funds and company assets; reduced value of our investments in research, development and engineering; litigation with, or payment of damages to, third parties; reputational damage; costs to comply with regulatory inquiries or actions; data privacy issues; costs to rebuild our internal information systems; and increased cybersecurity protection and remediation costs.

We carry insurance that provides some protection against the potential losses arising from a cybersecurity incident but it will not likely cover all such losses, and the losses that it does not cover may be significant.
We rely upon certain critical information systems for our daily business operations. Our inability to use or access our information systems at critical points in time could unfavorably impact our business operations.
Our global operations are dependent upon certain information systems, including telecommunications, the internet, our corporate intranet, network communications, email and various computer hardware and software applications. System failures or malfunctioning, such as difficulties with our customer relationship management (“CRM”) system, could disrupt our operations and our ability to timely and accurately process and report key components of our financial results. Our enterprise resource planning (“ERP”) system is integral to our ability to accurately and efficiently maintain our books and records, record transactions, provide critical information to our management, and prepare our financial statements. Any disruptions or difficulties that may occur in connection with our ERP system or other systems (whether in connection with the regular operation, periodic enhancements, modifications or upgrades of such systems or the integration of our acquired businesses into such systems) could adversely affect our ability to complete important business processes, such as the evaluation of our internal control over financial reporting pursuant to Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. Any of these events could have an adverse effect on our business, operating results and financial condition.
Acquisitions are an important element of our strategy but, because of the uncertainties involved, we may not find suitable acquisition candidates and we may not be able to successfully integrate and manage acquired businesses. We are also exposed to risks in connection with strategic alliances into which we may enter.
In addition to our efforts to develop new technologies from internal sources, part of our growth strategy is to pursue acquisitions and acquire new technologies from external sources. As part of this effort, in February 2019, we announced that we had consummated our acquisition of Orbotech. We may makealso enter into definitive agreements for and consummate acquisitions of, or significant investments in, businesses with complementary products, services and/or technologies. There can be no assurance that we will find suitable acquisition candidates or that acquisitions we complete will be successful. In addition, we may use equity to finance future acquisitions, which would increase our number of shares outstanding and be dilutive to current stockholders.
If we are unable to successfully integrate and manage acquired businesses, if the costs associated with integrating the acquired business exceeds our expectations, or if acquired businesses perform poorly, then our business and financial results may suffer. It is possible that the businesses we have acquired, as well as businesses that we may acquire in the future, may perform worse than expected or prove to be more difficult to integrate and manage than anticipated. In addition, we may lose key employees of the acquired companies. As a result, risks associated with acquisition transactions may give riselead to a material adverse effect on our business and financial results for a number of reasons, including:
we may have to devote unanticipated financial and management resources to acquired businesses;
the combination of businesses may causeresult in the loss of key personnel or an interruption of, or loss of momentum in, the activities of our company and/or the acquired business;
we may not be able to realize expected operating efficiencies or product integration benefits from our acquisitions;
we may experience challenges in entering into new market segments for which we have not previously manufactured and sold products;
we may face difficulties in coordinating geographically separated organizations, systems and facilities;
the customers, distributors, suppliers, employees and others with whom the companies we acquire have business dealings may have a potentially adverse reaction to the acquisition;
we may have difficulty implementing a cohesive framework of internal controls over the entire organization;
we may have to write-off goodwill or other intangible assets; and
we may incur unforeseen obligations or liabilities in connection with acquisitions.
At times, we may also enter into strategic alliances with customers, suppliers or other business partners with respect to development of technology and intellectual property. These alliances typically require significant investments of capital and exchange of proprietary, highly sensitive information. The success of these alliances depends on various factors over which we may have limited or no control and requires ongoing and effective cooperation with our strategic partners. Mergers and acquisitions and strategic alliances are inherently subject to significant risks, and the inability to effectively manage these risks could materially and adversely affect our business, financial condition and operating results.

Disruption of our manufacturing facilities or other operations, or in the operations of our customers, due to earthquake, flood, other natural catastrophic events, health epidemics or terrorism could result in cancellation of orders, delays in deliveries or other business activities, or loss of customers and could seriously harm our business.
We have significant manufacturing operations in the United States, Singapore, Israel, Germany, United Kingdom, Italy, and China. In addition, our business is international in nature, with our sales, service and administrative personnel and our customers located in numerous countries throughout the world. Operations at our manufacturing facilities and our assembly subcontractors, as well as our other operations and those of our customers, are subject to disruption for a variety of reasons, including work stoppages, acts of war, terrorism, health epidemics, fire, earthquake, volcanic eruptions, energy shortages, flooding or other natural disasters. Such disruption could cause delays in, among other things, shipments of products to our customers, our ability to perform services requested by our customers, or the installation and acceptance of our products at customer sites. We cannot ensureprovide any assurance that alternate means of conducting our operations (whether through alternate production capacity or service providers or otherwise) would be available if a major disruption were to occur or that, if such alternate means were available, they could be obtained on favorable terms.
In addition, as part of our cost-cutting actions, we have consolidated several operating facilities. Our California operations are now primarily centralized in our Milpitas facility. The consolidation of our California operations into a single campus could further concentrate the risks related to any of the disruptive events described above, such as acts of war or terrorism, earthquakes, fires or other natural disasters, if any such event were to impact our Milpitas facility.
We are predominantly uninsured for losses and interruptions caused by terrorist acts and acts of war. If international political instability continues or increases, our business and results of operations could be harmed.
The threat of terrorism targeted at, or acts of war in, the regions of the world in which we do business increases the uncertainty in our markets. Any act of terrorism or war that affects the economy or the semiconductor industryindustries we serve could adversely affect our business. Increased international political instability in various parts of the world, disruption in air transportation and further enhanced security measures as a result of terrorist attacks may hinder our ability to do business and may increase our costs of operations. We maintain significant manufacturing and research and development operations in Israel. Since the establishment of the State of Israel an areain 1948, a number of armed conflicts have taken place between Israel and its Arab neighbors, and a state of hostility varying in degree and intensity, has led to security and economic challenges for Israel. In addition, some our employees in Israel are obligated to perform annual reserve duty in the Israel Defense Forces, and may be called to active military duty in emergency circumstances. We cannot assess the impact that has historically experienced a high degreeemergency conditions in Israel in the future may have on our business, operations, financial condition or results of political instability, and we are therefore exposed to risks associated with future instabilityoperations, but it could be material. Instability in that region. Such instabilityany region could directly impact our ability to operate our business (or our customers’ ability to operate their businesses) in the affected region,, cause us to incur increased costs in transportation, make such transportation unreliable, increase our insurance costs, and cause international currency markets to fluctuate. Such instabilityInstability in the region could also have the same effects on our suppliers and their ability to timely deliver their products. If international political instability continues or increases in any region in which we do business, our business and results of operations could be harmed. We are predominantly uninsured for losses and interruptions caused by terrorist acts and acts of war.
We self-insure certain risks including earthquake risk. If one or more of the uninsured events occurs, we could suffer major financial loss.
We purchase insurance to help mitigate the economic impact of certain insurable risks; however, certain risks are uninsurable, are insurable only at significant cost or cannot be mitigated with insurance. Accordingly, we may experience a loss that is not covered by insurance, either because we do not carry applicable insurance or because the loss exceeds the applicable policy amount or is less than the deductible amount of the applicable policy. For example, we do not currently hold earthquake insurance. An earthquake could significantly disrupt our manufacturing operations, a significant portion of which are conducted in California, an area highly susceptible to earthquakes. It could also significantly delay our research and engineering efforts on new products, much of which is also conducted in California. We take steps to minimize the damage that would be caused by an earthquake, but there is no certainty that our efforts will prove successful in the event of an earthquake. We self-insure earthquake risks because we believe this is a prudent financial decision based on our cash reserves and the high cost and limited coverage available in the earthquake insurance market. Certain other risks are also self-insured either based on a similar cost-benefit analysis, or based on the unavailability of insurance. If one or more of the uninsured events occurs, we could suffer major financial loss.

We are exposed to foreign currency exchange rate fluctuations. Although we hedge certain currency risks, we may still be adversely affected by changes in foreign currency exchange rates or declining economic conditions in these countries.
We have some exposure to fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates, primarily the Japanese Yen, the euro, the pound sterling and the euro.Israeli new shekel. We have international subsidiaries that operate and sell our products globally. In addition, an increasing proportion of our manufacturing activities are conducted outside of the United States, and many of the costs associated with such activities are denominated in foreign currencies. We routinely hedge our exposures to certain foreign currencies with certain financial institutions in an effort to minimize the impact of certain currency exchange rate fluctuations, but these hedges may be inadequate to protect us from currency exchange rate fluctuations. To the extent that these hedges are inadequate, or if there are significant currency exchange rate fluctuations in currencies for which we do not have hedges in place, our reported financial results or the way we conduct our business could be adversely affected. Furthermore, if a financial counterparty to our hedges experiences financial difficulties or is otherwise unable to honor the terms of the foreign currency hedge, we may experience material financial losses.
We are exposed to fluctuations in interest rates and the market values of our portfolio investments; impairment of our investments could harm our earnings. In addition, we and our stockholders are exposed to risks related to the volatility of the market for our common stock.
Our investment portfolio primarily consists of both corporate and government debt securities that are susceptible to changes in market interest rates and bond yields. As market interest rates and bond yields increase, those securities with a lower yield-at-cost show a mark-to-market unrealized loss. We believe we have the ability to realize the full value of all these investments upon maturity. However, an impairment of the fair market value of our investments, even if unrealized, must be reflected in our financial statements for the applicable period and may therefore have a material adverse effect on our results of operations for that period.
In addition, the market price for our common stock is volatile and has fluctuated significantly during recent years. The trading price of our common stock could continue to be highly volatile and fluctuate widely in response to various factors, including without limitation conditions in the semiconductor industry and other industries in which we operate, fluctuations in the global economy or capital markets, our operating results or other performance metrics, or adverse consequences experienced by us as a result of any of the risks described elsewhere in this Item 1A. Volatility in the market price of our common stock could cause an investor in our common stock to experience a loss on the value of their investment in us and could also adversely impact our ability to raise capital through the sale of our common stock or to use our common stock as consideration to acquire other companies.
We are exposed to risks in connection with tax and regulatory compliance audits in various jurisdictions.
We are subject to tax and regulatory compliance audits (such as related to customs or product safety requirements) in various jurisdictions, and such jurisdictions may assess additional income or other taxes, penalties, fines or other prohibitions against us. Although we believe our tax estimates are reasonable and that our products and practices comply with applicable regulations, the final determination of any such audit and any related litigation could be materially different from our historical income tax provisions and accruals related to income taxes and other contingencies. In addition to and in connection with the Israel Tax Authority (“ITA”) Assessment described in more detail in Note 13, “Income Taxes” to our Consolidated Financial Statements, there is an ongoing criminal investigation against our Orbotech subsidiary, certain of its employees and its tax consultant that began prior to the Acquisition Date. We can make no assurances that an indictment will not result from the criminal investigation. The results of an audit or litigation could have a material adverse effect on our operating results or cash flows in the period or periods for which that determination is made.
A change in our effective tax rate can have a significant adverse impact on our business.
We earn profits in, and are therefore potentially subject to taxes in, the U.S. and numerous foreign jurisdictions, including Singapore, Israel and the Cayman Islands, the countries in which we earn the majority of our non-U.S. profits. Due to economic, political or other conditions, tax rates in those jurisdictions may be subject to significant change. A number of factors may adversely impact our future effective tax rates, such as the jurisdictions in which our profits are determined to be earned and taxed; changes in the tax rates imposed by those jurisdictions; expiration of tax holidays in certain jurisdictions that are not renewed; the resolution of issues arising from tax audits with various tax authorities; changes in the valuation of our deferred tax assets and liabilities; adjustments to estimated taxes upon finalization of various tax returns; increases in expenses not deductible for tax purposes, including write-offs of acquired in-process research and development and impairment of goodwill in connection with acquisitions; changes in available tax credits; changes in stock-based compensation expense; changes in tax laws or the interpretation of such tax laws (for example, proposals for fundamental United States international tax reform);laws; changes in generally accepted accounting principles; and the repatriation of earnings from outside the United StatesU.S. for which we have not previously provided for United StatesU.S. taxes. A change in our effective tax rate can materially and adversely impact our results from operations.

In addition, recent changes to U.S. tax laws will significantly impact how U.S. multinational corporations are taxed on foreign earnings. Numerous countries are evaluating their existing tax laws due in part, to recommendations made by the Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development’s (“OECD’s”) Base Erosion and Profit Shifting (“BEPS”) project. As of December 31, 2018, we have completed our accounting for the tax effects of the Act, which was enacted into law on December 22, 2017. However, the recent U.S. tax law changes are subject to future guidance from U.S. federal and state governments, such as the Treasury Department and/or the IRS. Any future guidance can change our tax liability. A significant portion of the income taxes due to the enactment of the Act is payable by us over a period of eight years. As a result, our cash flows from operating activities will be adversely impacted until tax liability is paid in full.
Compliance with federal securities laws, rules and regulations, as well as NASDAQ requirements, has become increasingly complex, and the significant attention and expense we must devote to those areas may have an adverse impact on our business.
Federal securities laws, rules and regulations, as well as NASDAQ rules and regulations, require companies to maintain extensive corporate governance measures, impose comprehensive reporting and disclosure requirements, set strict independence and financial expertise standards for audit and other committee members and impose civil and criminal penalties for companies and their chief executive officers, chief financial officers and directors for securities law violations. These laws, rules and regulations have increased, and in the future are expected to continue to increase, the scope, complexity and cost of our corporate governance, reporting and disclosure practices, which could harm our results of operations and divert management’s attention from business operations.
A change in accounting standards or practices or a change in existing taxation rules or practices (or changes in interpretations of such standards, practices or rules) can have a significant effect on our reported results and may even affect reporting of transactions completed before the change is effective.
New accounting standards and taxation rules and varying interpretations of accounting pronouncements and taxation rules have occurred and will continue to occur in the future. Changes to (or revised interpretations or applications of) existing accounting standards or tax rules or the questioning of current or past practices may adversely affect our reported financial results or the way we conduct our business. For example, in May 2014, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued an accounting standard update regarding revenue from contracts with customers, and in February 2016, the FASB issued an accounting standard update which amends the existing accounting standards for leases. Adoption of new standards may require changes to our processes, accounting systems, and internal controls. Difficulties encountered during adoption could result in internal control deficiencies or delay the reporting of our financial results. In addition, the passing of the Act in December 2017 caused us to significantly increase our provision for income taxes, which had a material adverse effect on our net income for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2018. Further interpretations of the Act from the government and regulatory organizations may change our tax expense provided for our transitional tax liability and deferred tax adjustments as well as our provision liability or accounting treatment of the provisional liability which may potentially affect the measurement of these balances or potentially give rise to new deferred tax amounts.
ITEM 1B.UNRESOLVED STAFF COMMENTS

None.

ITEM 2.PROPERTIES
Information regarding our principal properties as of June 30, 2017 is set forth below:
LocationTypePrincipal Use
Square
Footage
Ownership
Milpitas, CA
Office, plant and
warehouse
Principal Executive Offices, Research, Engineering, Marketing, Manufacturing, Service and Sales Administration727,302Owned
Westwood, MA(1)
Office and plantEngineering, Marketing, Manufacturing and Service116,908Leased
Leuven, Belgium(1)
Office, plant and
warehouse
Engineering, Marketing and Service and Sales Administration60,654Owned
Shenzhen, ChinaOffice and plantSales, Service and Manufacturing47,840Leased
Shanghai, ChinaOfficeResearch, Service and Sales Administration58,109Leased
Weilburg, GermanyOffice and plantEngineering, Marketing, Manufacturing, Service and Sales Administration138,119Leased
Chennai, IndiaOfficeEngineering46,351Leased
Chennai, IndiaOfficeEngineering33,366Owned
Migdal Ha’Emek, IsraelOffice and plantResearch, Engineering, Marketing, Manufacturing, Service and Sales Administration191,982Owned
Yokohama, Japan
Office and
warehouse
Sales and Service35,531Leased
Serangoon, Singapore(2)
Office and plantSales, Service and Manufacturing248,155Owned
Hsinchu, TaiwanOfficeSales and Service73,676Leased
__________________ 
(1)Portions of this property are sublet, are vacant and marketed to sublease, or are leased to third parties.
(2)We own the building at our location in Serangoon, Singapore, but the land on which this building resides is leased.
Our headquarters are located in Milpitas, California. As of June 30, 2017,2019, we owned or leased a total of approximately 2.13.4 million square feet of space worldwide, including the locations listed above and office space for smallerresearch, engineering, marketing, service, sales and service officesadministration worldwide primarily in several locations throughout the world.U.S., Israel, China, Singapore, Germany and Taiwan. Our operating leases expire at various times through November 7, 2028, subject to renewal, with some of the leases containing renewal option clauses at the fair market value, for additional periods up to five years. Additional information regarding these leases is incorporated herein by reference to Note 13,14, “Commitments and Contingencies” to the consolidated financial statements.Consolidated Financial Statements. We believe our properties are adequately maintained and suitable for their intended use and that our production facilities have capacity adequate for our current needs.
Information regarding our principal properties as of June 30, 2019 is set forth below:
(Square Feet)United States Other Countries Total
Owned(1)
727,302
 695,048
 1,422,350
Leased426,535
 1,519,614
 1,946,149
Total1,153,837
 2,214,662
 3,368,499
__________________ 
(1)Includes 248,155 square feet of property owned at out location in Serangoon, Singapore, where the land on which this building resides is leased.
ITEM 3.LEGAL PROCEEDINGS
The information set forth below under Note 14,15, “Litigation and Other Legal Matters” to the consolidated financial statementsConsolidated Financial Statements is incorporated herein by reference.
ITEM 4.MINE SAFETY DISCLOSURES
Not applicable.

PART II

ITEM 5.MARKET FOR REGISTRANT’S COMMON EQUITY, RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS AND ISSUER PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES
Our common stock is listed and traded on the NASDAQ Global Select Market under the symbol “KLAC.”
The prices per share reflected in the following table represent the high and low prices for our common stock on the NASDAQ Global Select Market for the periods indicated:
 Year ended June 30, 2017 Year ended June 30, 2016
 High     Low     Cash Dividends Declared per share High     Low     Cash Dividends Declared per share
First Fiscal Quarter$77.85
 $66.88
 $0.52
 $57.35
 $44.95
 $0.52
Second Fiscal Quarter$83.23
 $69.75
 $0.54
 $70.28
 $48.73
 $0.52
Third Fiscal Quarter$96.91
 $77.86
 $0.54
 $73.19
 $62.33
 $0.52
Fourth Fiscal Quarter$109.59
 $91.09
 $0.54
 $75.17
 $67.32
 $0.52
On JuneAugust 1, 2017,2019, we announced that our Board of Directors had authorized an increase in the level of ourdeclared a quarterly cash dividend from $0.54of $0.75 per share to $0.59 per share. Additional information regardingbe paid on September 3, 2019 to stockholders of record as of the declarationclose of our quarterly cash dividend after June 30, 2017 can be found in Note 19, “Subsequent Events” to the Consolidated Financial Statements.business on August 15, 2019.
As of July 14, 2017,19, 2019, there were 394383 holders of record of our common stock.
Equity Repurchase Plans
The following is a summary of stock repurchases for each month during the fourth quarter of the fiscal year ended June 30, 20172019(1):
PeriodTotal Number of
Shares
Purchased (2)
 Average Price Paid
per Share
 Maximum Number of
Shares that May
Yet Be Purchased Under the Plans or Programs (3)
April 1, 2017 to April 30, 2017
 $
 5,916,120
May 1, 2017 to May 31, 2017148,769
 $102.03
 5,767,351
June 1, 2017 to June 30, 201794,391
 $104.06
 5,672,960
Total243,160
 $102.82
  
PeriodTotal Number of
Shares
Purchased (1)
 Average Price Paid
per Share
 Approximate Dollar Value that May
Yet Be Purchased Under the Plans or Programs (2)
April 1, 2019 to April 30, 2019507,700
 $123.81
 $1,142,833,354
May 1, 2019 to May 31, 20191,693,619
 $109.10
 $958,067,283
June 1, 2019 to June 30, 2019899,092
 $110.53
 $858,692,904
Total3,100,411
 $111.92
  
 __________________ 
(1)Our Board of Directors has authorized a program forwhich permits us to repurchase sharesup to $2.00 billion of our common stock. The total number and dollar amountstock, reflecting an increase from $1.00 billion upon the close of shares repurchased for the fiscal years ended June 30, 2017, 2016 and 2015 were 0.2 million shares ($25.0 million), 3.4 million shares ($175.7 million) and 9.3 million shares ($608.9 million), respectively.
(2)All shares were purchased pursuant to the publicly announced repurchase program described in footnote 1 above.Orbotech Acquisition. Shares are reported based on the trade date of the applicable repurchase.
(3)(2)The stock repurchase program has no expiration date.date and may be suspended at any time. Future repurchases of our common stock under our repurchase program may be effected through various different repurchase transaction structures, including isolated open market transactions or systematic repurchase plans.



Stock Performance Graph and Cumulative Total Return
Notwithstanding any statement to the contrary in any of our previous or future filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission, the following information relating to the price performance of our common stock shall not be deemed “filed” with the Commission or “soliciting material” under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and shall not be incorporated by reference into any such filings.
The following graph compares the cumulative 5-year total return attained by stockholders on our common stock relative to the cumulative total returns of the S&P 500 Index (as required by SEC regulations) and the Philadelphia Semiconductor Index (PHLX). The graph tracks the performance of a $100 investment in our common stock and in each of the indices (with the reinvestment of all dividends) from June 30, 20122014 to June 30, 2017.2019.
totalreturnlinegraphupdated.jpg
 June 2012 June 2013 June 2014 June 2015 June 2016 June 2017
KLA-Tencor Corporation$100.00 $116.72 $156.61 $155.36 $209.39 $268.60
S&P 500$100.00 $120.60 $150.27 $161.43 $167.87 $197.92
PHLX Semiconductor$100.00 $116.96 $156.62 $161.36 $173.61 $241.00
__________________ 
 * Assumes $100 invested on June 30, 2012 in stock or index, including reinvestment of dividends.
 June 2014 June 2015 June 2016 June 2017 June 2018 June 2019
KLA Corporation$100.00 $99.11 $133.57 $171.34 $196.71 $233.26
S&P 500$100.00 $107.42 $111.71 $131.70 $150.64 $166.33
PHLX Semiconductor$100.00 $108.97 $113.07 $172.12 $222.22 $251.80
Our fiscal year ends June 30. The comparisons in the graph above are based upon historical data and are not necessarily indicative of, nor intended to forecast, future stock price performance.

ITEM 6.SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA
The following tables include selected consolidated summary financial data for each of our last five fiscal years. This data should be read in conjunction with Item 8, “Financial Statements and Supplementary Data,” and Item 7, “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” in this Annual Report on Form 10-K. 
Year ended June 30,Year ended June 30,
(In thousands, except per share amounts)2017 2016 2015 2014 20132019 2018 2017 2016 2015
Consolidated Statements of Operations:         
Consolidated Statements of Operations(1)(2):
         
Total revenues$3,480,014
 $2,984,493
 $2,814,049
 $2,929,408
 $2,842,781
$4,568,904
 $4,036,701
 $3,480,014
 $2,984,493
 $2,814,049
Net income(1)
$926,076
 $704,422
 $366,158
 $582,755
 $543,149
Net income attributable to KLA(3)
$1,175,617
 $802,265
 $926,076
 $704,422
 $366,158
Cash dividends declared per share (including a special cash dividend of $16.50 per share declared during the three months ended December 31, 2014)$2.14
 $2.08
 $18.50
 $1.80
 $1.60
$3.00
 $2.52
 $2.14
 $2.08
 $18.50
Net income per share:         
Net income per share attributable to KLA:         
Basic$5.92
 $4.52
 $2.26
 $3.51
 $3.27
$7.53
 $5.13
 $5.92
 $4.52
 $2.26
Diluted$5.88
 $4.49
 $2.24
 $3.47
 $3.21
$7.49
 $5.10
 $5.88
 $4.49
 $2.24
                  
As of June 30,As of June 30,
2017 2016 2015 2014 20132019 2018 2017 2016 2015
Consolidated Balance Sheets:         
Consolidated Balance Sheets(1)(2):
         
Cash, cash equivalents and marketable securities$3,016,740
 $2,491,294
 $2,387,111
 $3,152,637
 $2,918,881
$1,739,385
 $2,880,318
 $3,016,740
 $2,491,294
 $2,387,111
Working capital(2)(4)
$3,098,904
 $2,865,609
 $2,902,813
 $3,690,484
 $3,489,236
$2,546,589
 $3,334,730
 $3,102,094
 $2,868,062
 $2,904,758
Total assets$5,532,173
 $4,962,432
 $4,826,012
 $5,535,846
 $5,283,804
$9,008,516
 $5,638,619
 $5,550,334
 $4,977,076
 $4,841,023
Long-term debt(3)(5)
$2,680,474
 $3,057,936
 $3,173,435
 $745,101
 $743,823
$3,173,383
 $2,237,402
 $2,680,474
 $3,057,936
 $3,173,435
Total stockholders’ equity(3)
$1,326,417
 $689,114
 $421,439
 $3,669,346
 $3,482,152
Total KLA stockholders’ equity(5)
$2,659,108
 $1,620,511
 $1,326,417
 $689,114
 $421,439
__________
(1)On July 1, 2018, we adopted ASC 606 using the modified retrospective transition approach. Results for reporting periods beginning after June 30, 2018 are presented under ASC 606, while prior period amounts are not adjusted and continue to be reported in accordance with the previous revenue guidance in ASC 605. Refer to Note 2, “Revenue” to our Consolidated Financial Statements for additional details.
(2)On February 20, 2019, we completed the acquisition of Orbotech for total purchase consideration of approximately $3.26 billion. The operating results of Orbotech have been included in our Consolidated Financial Statements for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2019 from the Acquisition Date. For additional details, refer to Note 6 “Business Combinations” to our Consolidated Financial Statements.
(3)Our net income decreased to $802.3 million in the fiscal year ended June 30, 2018, primarily as a result of the income tax effects from the enacted tax reform legislation through the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act, which was signed into law on December 22, 2017. Our net income was $366.2 million in the fiscal year ended June 30, 2015, primarily as a result of the impact of the pre-tax net loss of $131.7 million for the loss on extinguishment of debt and certain one-time expenses of $2.5 million associated with the leveraged recapitalization that was completed during the three months ended December 31, 2014.
(2)(4)We adopted the accounting standards update regarding classification of deferred taxes on a prospective basis at the beginning of the fourth quarter of fiscal year ended 2016. Upon adoption, approximately $218.0 million in net current deferred tax assets were reclassified to noncurrent. No prior periods were retrospectively adjusted.
(3)(5)Our long-term debt increased to $3.17 billion at the end of fiscal year ended June 30, 2015,2019, because as part of the leveraged recapitalization plan, we issued $2.50$1.20 billion aggregate principal amount of senior, unsecured long-term notes (collectively referred to as “Senior Notes”), entered into $750.0 million of five-year senior unsecured prepayable term loans and a $500.0 million unfunded revolving credit facility and redeemed our $750.0 million aggregate principal amount of 6.900% Senior Notes due in 2018 (the “2018 Notes”).notes. Refer to Note 7,8, “Debt” to our Consolidated Financial Statements for additional details. Our total stockholders’ equity decreased to $421.4 million at the end of fiscal year ended June 30, 2015, because, as part of our leveraged recapitalization plan, we declared a special cash dividend of approximately $2.76 billion. Refer to Note 8,9, “Equity, and Long-term Incentive Compensation Plans”Plans and Non-Controlling Interest” to the consolidated financial statementsConsolidated Financial Statements for additional details.



ITEM 7.
MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
The following discussion of our financial condition and results of operations should be read in conjunction with our Consolidated Financial Statements and the related notes included in Item 8, “Financial Statements and Supplementary Data,” in this Annual Report on Form 10-K. This discussion contains forward-looking statements, which involve risks and uncertainties. Our actual results could differ materially from those anticipated in the forward-looking statements as a result of certain factors, including but not limited to those discussed in Item 1A, “Risk Factors” and elsewhere in this Annual Report on Form 10-K. (See “Special Note Regarding Forward-Looking Statements.Statements”). Pursuant to the FAST Act Modernization and Simplification of Regulation S-K, discussions related to the changes in results of operations from fiscal year 2018 to fiscal year 2017 have been omitted. Such omitted discussion can be found under Item 7 of our annual Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2018, filed with the SEC.
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
We are a leading supplier of process control and yield management solutions for the semiconductor and related nanoelectronics industries. Our broad portfolio of inspection and metrology products, and related service, software and other offerings primarily supports integrated circuit (“IC” or “chip”) manufacturers throughout the entire semiconductor fabrication process, from research and development to final volume production. We provide leading edge equipment, software and support that enable IC manufacturers to identify, resolve and manage significant advanced technology manufacturing process challenges and obtain higher finished product yields at lower overall cost. In addition to serving the semiconductor industry, we also provide a range of technology solutions to a number of other high technology industries, including advanced packaging, light emitting diode (LED”), power devices, compound semiconductor, and data storage industries, as well as general materials research.
Our products and services are used by the vast majority of bare wafer, IC, lithography reticle (“reticle” or “mask”) and hard disk drive manufacturers around the world. Our products, services and expertise are used by our customers to measure, detect, analyze and resolve critical product defects that arise in that environment in order to control nanometric level manufacturing processes.
Our revenues are driven largely by our customers’ spending on capital equipment and related maintenance services necessary to support key transitions in their underlying product technologies, or to increase their production volumes in response to market demand or expansion plans. Our semiconductor customers generally operate in one or more of the three major semiconductor markets - memory, foundry and logic. All three of these markets are characterized by rapid technological changes and sudden shifts in end-user demand, which influence the level and pattern of our customers’ spending on our products and services. Although capital spending in all three semiconductor markets has historically been very cyclical, the demand for more advanced and lower cost chips used in a growing number of consumer electronics, communications, data processing, and industrial and automotive products has resulted over the long term in a favorable demand environment for our process control and yield management solutions, particularly in the foundry and logic markets, which have higher levels of process control adoption than the memory market.
Through the acquisition of Orbotech, Ltd. (“Orbotech”), we have expanded our reach in the electronics value chain to include technologically advanced, yield-enhancing and process-enabling solutions to address various manufacturing stages of Printed Circuit Boards (“PCB”), Flat Panel Displays (“FPD”), Specialty Semiconductor Devices (“SD”) and other electronic components. The products include Automated Optical Inspection (“AOI”), Automated Optical Shaping (“AOS”), Direct Imaging (“DI”), additive printing, laser drilling, laser plotters, Computer aided manufacturing (“CAM”) and engineering solutions for PCB and additional adjacent electronics component manufacturing, as well as AOI, test, repair and process monitoring systems for FPD manufacturing and vacuum process tools for etch, Physical Vapor Deposition (“PVD”), Molecular Vapor Deposition (“MVD”) and Chemical Vapor Deposition (“CVD”) solutions for SD manufacturing.
In our newly acquired Orbotech business, consumer end markets have been experiencing a fundamental shift in technology complexity, driven primarily by the proliferation of high-end mobile devices and automotive devices, as well as by the demand for large area FPDs such as large-size LCD televisions and OLED displays. The shift towards 5G connectivity and the fast-paced growth of the Internet of Things (“IoT”) services is expected to continue to further accelerate this shift as more devices become connected and dependent upon other electronic devices.

As a supplier to the global semiconductor, semiconductor-related and electronics industries, our customer base continues to become more highly concentrated over time, thereby increasing the potential impact of a sudden change in capital spending by a major customer on our revenues and profitability. As our customer base becomes increasingly more concentrated, large orders from a relatively limited number of customers account for a substantial portion of our sales, which potentially exposes us to more volatility for revenues and earnings. In the global semiconductor and electronics related industries, China is emerging as a major region for manufacturing of logic and memory chips, adding to its role as the world’s largest consumer of ICs. Additionally, a significant portion of global FPD and PCB manufacturing has migrated to China. Government initiatives are propelling China to expand its domestic manufacturing capacity and attracting semiconductor manufacturers from Taiwan, Korea, Japan and the US. China is currently seen as an important long-term growth region for the semiconductor and electronics capital equipment sector. We are also subject to the cyclical capital spending that has historically characterized the semiconductor, semiconductor-related and electronics industries. The timing, length, intensity and volatility of the capacity-oriented capital spending cycles of our customers are unpredictable.
The semiconductor and electronics industries have also been characterized by constant technological innovation. Currently, there are multiple drivers for growth in the industry with increased demand for chips providing computation power and connectivity for Artificial Intelligence (“AI”) applications and support for mobile devices at the leading edge of foundry and logic chip manufacturing. Qualification of early extreme ultraviolet (“EUV”) lithography processes and equipment is driving growth at leading logic/foundry and dynamic random-access memory (“DRAM”) manufacturers. Expansion of IoT together with increasing acceptance of advanced driver assistance systems (“ADAS”) in anticipation of the introduction of autonomous cars have begun to accelerate legacy-node technology conversions and capacity expansions. Intertwined in these areas, spurred by data storage and connectivity needs, is the growth in demand for memory chips. On the other hand, higher design costs for the most advanced ICs could economically constrain leading-edge manufacturing technology customers to focus their resources on only the large technologically advanced products and applications. We believe that, over the long term, our customers will continue to invest in advanced technologies and new materials to enable smaller design rules and higher density applications that fuel demand for process control equipment, although the growth for such equipment may be adversely impacted by higher design costs for advanced ICs, reuse of installed products, and delays in production ramps by our customers in response to higher costs and technical challenges at more advanced technology nodes.
Additionally, current trends in smart mobile devices, 5G connectivity, automotive electronics, smart vehicles, flexible displays, AR/VR and wearable devices, high-performance computing, large size televisions and the IoT are expected to drive the need for production, inspection, test and repair solutions that are able to address the cutting-edge technology embedded in these types of electronic products.
The demand for our products and our revenue levels are driven by our customers’ needs to solve the process challenges that they face as they adopt new technologies required to fabricate advanced ICs that are incorporated into sophisticated mobile devices. Our customers continuously seek to increase yields and enhance the efficiency of their manufacturing processes, including by improving their manufacturing, inspection, testing and repair capabilities.
Subsequent to the Orbotech Acquisition, we changed our organizational structure resulting in four reportable segments: Semiconductor Process Control, Specialty Semiconductor Process, PCB, Display and Component Inspection, and Other. Prior period results have been recast to conform to the current presentation.
Our view of the current wafer fab equipment demand climate is aligned with consensus industry analyst expectations for the calendar year 2019, which reflects a decline in capital equipment spending by memory customers. In contrast to the memory business, capital equipment spending by foundry and logic customers at the leading edge has begun to ramp up, and the momentum is expected to continue in calendar year 2019. We have already seen our mix of business begin to shift toward increased purchases by logic and foundry customers as a percentage of total sales, and we expect spending from these customers to continue to remain strong. Because of a more diversified semiconductor device-end demand, and disciplined capacity planning by wafer fab equipment customers, we believe the long-term growth dynamics for the industry remain strong. While manufacturers of PCBs, FPDs, SDs and other electronic components create different products for diverse end-markets, they share similar production challenges in an increasingly competitive environment.

The following table sets forth some of our key consolidated financial information for each of our last three fiscal years(1):
 Year ended June 30,
(Dollar amounts in thousands, except diluted net income per share)2019 2018 2017
Total revenues$4,568,904
 $4,036,701
 $3,480,014
Costs of revenues$1,869,377
 $1,446,041
 $1,286,215
Gross margin percentage59% 64% 63%
Net income attributable to KLA(2)
$1,175,617
 $802,265
 $926,076
Diluted net income per share attributable to KLA$7.49
 $5.10
 $5.88
__________________ 
(1)On July 1, 2018, we adopted ASC 606 using the modified retrospective transition approach. Results for reporting periods beginning after June 30, 2018 are presented under ASC 606, while prior period amounts are not adjusted and continue to be reported in accordance with the previous revenue guidance in ASC 605.
(2)Our net income attributable to KLA decreased to $802.3 million in the fiscal year ended June 30, 2018, primarily as a result of the income tax effects from the enacted tax reform legislation through the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act, which was signed into law on December 22, 2017.

Total revenues during the fiscal year ended June 30, 2019 increased by 13% compared to the fiscal year ended June 30, 2018. Our year over year revenue growth reflected strong demand in the semiconductor process control market, growth in service revenues, and additional revenues from the Orbotech business which was acquired in the fiscal year ended June 30, 2019.

Acquisition of Orbotech, Ltd.
On February 20, 2019, we completed the acquisition of Orbotech for total purchase consideration of approximately $3.26 billion. Orbotech’s core business enables electronic device manufacturers to inspect, test and measure printed circuit boards and flat panel displays to verify their quality; pattern electronic circuitry on substrate and perform three-dimensional shaping of metalized circuits on multiple surfaces; and utilize advanced vacuum deposition and etching process in semiconductor device and semiconductor manufacturing and to perform laser drilling of electronic substrates. For additional details on the financial statement impacts of the Orbotech acquisition, refer to Note 6 “Business Combinations” to our Consolidated Financial Statements.
In addition, our Board of Directors has authorized a share repurchase of up to $2.00 billion of our common stock, reflecting an increase from $1.00 billion upon the close of the Orbotech Acquisition. We raised approximately $1.20 billion in new long-term debt financing to partially refinance our existing debt, to repurchase shares and for general corporate purposes. For additional details, refer to Note 8, “Debt”, and Note 10, “Stock Repurchase Program” to our Consolidated Financial Statements.
CRITICAL ACCOUNTING ESTIMATES AND POLICIES
The preparation of our consolidated financial statementsConsolidated Financial Statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America requires management to make estimates and assumptions in applying our accounting policies that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenues and expenses, and related disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities. We base these estimates and assumptions on historical experience and evaluate them on an on-goingongoing basis to ensure that they remain reasonable under current conditions. Actual results could differ from those estimates. We discuss the development and selection of the critical accounting estimates with the Audit Committee of our Board of Directors on a quarterly basis, and the Audit Committee has reviewed our related disclosure in this Annual Report on Form 10-K. The accounting policies that reflect our more significant estimates, judgments and assumptions and which we believe are the most critical to aid in fully understanding and evaluating our reported financial results include the following:
Revenue Recognition. We recognizeprimarily derive revenue from the sale of process control and yield management solutions for the semiconductor and related nanoelectronics industries, maintenance and support of all these products, installation and training services and the sale of spare parts. Our solutions provide a comprehensive portfolio of inspection, metrology and data analytics products, which are accompanied by a flexible portfolio of services to enable our customers to maintain the performance and productivity of the solutions purchased. The acquisition of Orbotech enabled us to broaden our portfolio to include the yield enhancement and production solutions used by manufacturers of printed circuit boards, flat panel displays, advanced packaging, micro-electro-mechanical systems and other electronic components.

Our solutions are generally not sold with a right of return, nor have we experienced significant returns from or refunds to our customers.
We account for a contract with a customer when persuasive evidencethere is approval and commitment from both parties, the rights of the parties are identified, payment terms are identified, the contract has commercial substance and collectibility of consideration is probable.
Our revenues are measured based on consideration stipulated in the arrangement with each customer, net of any sales incentives and amounts collected on behalf of third parties, such as sales taxes. The revenues are recognized as separate performance obligations that are satisfied by transferring control of the product or service to the customer.
Our arrangements with our customers include various combinations of products and services, which are generally capable of being distinct and accounted for as separate performance obligations. A product or service is considered distinct if it is separately identifiable from other deliverables in the arrangement and if a customer can benefit from it on its own or with other resources that are readily available to the customer.
The transaction consideration, including any sales incentives, is allocated between separate performance obligations of an arrangement exists, delivery has occurredbased on the stand-alone selling prices (“SSP”) for each distinct product or service. Management considers a variety of factors to determine the SSP, such as, historical standalone sales of products and services, have been rendered, the selling price is fixeddiscounting strategies and other observable data.
From time to time, our contracts are modified to account for additional, or determinable, and collectibility is reasonably assured. to change existing, performance obligations. Our contract modifications are generally accounted for prospectively.
Product Revenue
We deriverecognize revenue from three sources—product sales at a point in time when we have satisfied our performance obligation by transferring control of systems, spare partsthe product to the customer. We use judgment to evaluate whether the control has transferred by considering several indicators, including:
whether we have a present right to payment;
the customer has legal title;
the customer has physical possession;
the customer has significant risk and services. In general, we recognize revenue for systemsrewards of ownership; and
the customer has accepted the product, or whether customer acceptance is considered a formality based on history of acceptance of similar products (for example, when the system has been installed, is operating according to predetermined specifications and is accepted by the customer. When we have demonstrated a history of successful installation and acceptance, we recognize revenue upon delivery and customer acceptance. Under certain circumstances, however, we recognize revenue prior to acceptance from the customer, as follows:
When the customer fab has previously accepted the same tool, with the same specifications, and when we can objectively demonstrate that the tool meets all of the required acceptance criteria.
When system sales to independent distributors have no installation requirement, contain no acceptance agreement,criteria, and 100% of the payment is due based upon shipment.
Whenwhen the installation of the system is deemed perfunctory.perfunctory).
WhenNot all of the customer withholds acceptance dueindicators need to issues unrelatedbe met for us to product performance, in which case revenue is recognized whenconclude that control has transferred to the system is performing as intended and meets predetermined specifications.
customer. In circumstances in which we recognize revenue is recognized prior to installation,the product acceptance, the portion of revenue associated with installationour performance obligations to install product is deferred based on estimated fair value, and that revenue is recognized upon completion of the installation.
In many instances, products are sold in stand-alone arrangements. Services are sold separately through renewals of annual maintenance contracts. We have multiple element revenue arrangements in cases where certain elements of a sales arrangement are not delivered and accepted in one reporting period. To determine the relative fair value of each element in a revenue arrangement, we allocate arrangement consideration based on the selling price hierarchy. For substantially all of the arrangements with multiple deliverables pertaining to products and services, we use vendor-specific objective evidence (“VSOE”) or third-party evidence (“TPE”) to allocate the selling price to each deliverable. We determine TPE based on historical prices charged for products and services when sold on a stand-alone basis. When we are unable to establish relative selling price using VSOE or TPE, we use estimated selling price (“ESP”) in our allocation of arrangement consideration. The objective of ESP is to determine the price at which we would transact a sale if the product or service were sold on a stand-alone basis. ESP could potentially be used for new or customized products. We regularly review relative selling prices and maintain internal controls over the establishment and updates of these estimates.
In a multiple element revenue arrangement, we defer revenue recognition associated with the relative fair value of each undelivered element until that element is delivered to the customer. To be considered a separate element, the product or service in question must represent a separate unit of accounting, which means that such product or service must fulfill the following criteria: (a) the delivered item(s) has value to the customer on a stand-alone basis; and (b) if the arrangement includes a general right of return relative to the delivered item(s), delivery or performance of the undelivered item(s) is considered probable and substantially in our control. If the arrangement does not meet all the above criteria, the entire amount of the sales contract is deferred until all elements are accepted by the customer.

Trade-in rights are occasionally granted to customers to trade in tools in connection with subsequent purchases. We estimate the value of the trade-in right and reduce the revenue recognized on the initial sale. This amount is recognized at the earlier of the exercise of the trade-in right or the expiration of the trade-in right.acceptance.
We enter into volume purchase agreements with some of our customers. We accrueadjust the transaction consideration for estimated credits earned by our customers for such incentives,incentives. These credits are estimated based upon the forecasted and actual product sales for any given period and agreed-upon incentive rate. The estimate is updated at each reporting period.
We offer perpetual and term licenses for defects and data analysis software. The primary difference between perpetual and term licenses is the duration over which the customer can benefit from the use of the software, while the functionality and the features of the software are the same. With the acquisition of Orbotech we offer computer-aided manufacturing and engineering software solutions for the printed circuit boards production. Software is generally bundled with post-contract customer support (“PCS”), which includes unspecified software updates that are made available throughout the entire term of the arrangement. Revenue from software licenses is recognized at a point in situationstime, when the credit levels vary depending upon sales volume, we update our accrual based on the amount that we estimate to be purchased pursuantsoftware is made available to the volume purchase agreements. Accruals for customer credits are recorded as an offset to revenue orcustomer. Revenue from PCS is deferred revenue.
Spare parts revenue is recognized when the product has been shipped, risk of loss has passed to the customerat contract inception and collection of the resulting receivable is probable.
Service and maintenance contract revenue is recognized ratably over the termservice period, or as services are performed.

Services and Spare Parts Revenue
The majority of product sales include a standard 6 to 12-month warranty that is not separately paid for by the customers. The customers may also purchase extended warranty for periods beyond the initial year as part of the initial product sale. We have concluded that the standard 12-month warranty as well as any extended warranty periods included in the initial product sales are separate performance obligations. The estimated fair value of warranty services is deferred and recognized ratably as revenue over the warranty period, as the customer simultaneously receives and consumes the benefits of warranty services provided by us.
Additionally, we offer product maintenance contract.and support services, which the customer may purchase separately from the standard and extended warranty offered as part of the initial product sale. Revenue from separately negotiated maintenance and support service contracts is also recognized over time based on the terms of the applicable service period. Revenue from services performed in the absence of a maintenance contract, including consulting and training revenue, is recognized when the related services are performedperformed. We also sell spare parts, revenue from which is recognized when control over the spare parts is transferred to the customer.
Installation services include connecting and collectibilityvalidating configuration of the product. In addition, several testing protocols are completed to confirm the equipment is reasonably assured.performing to customer specifications. Revenues from product installation are deferred and recognized at a point in time, once installation is complete.
We sell stand-alone software thatSignificant Judgments
Our contracts with our customers often include promises to transfer multiple products and services. Each product and service is subjectgenerally capable of being distinct within the context of the contract and represents a separate performance obligation. Determining the SSP for each distinct performance obligation and allocation of consideration from an arrangement to softwarethe individual performance obligations and the appropriate timing of revenue recognition guidance.are significant judgments with respect to these arrangements. We periodically review selling prices to determine whether VSOE exists, and in situations where we are unable to establish VSOE for undelivered elements such as post-contract service, revenue is recognized ratably overtypically estimate the termSSP of the service contract.
We also defer the fair value of non-standard warranty bundled with equipment sales as unearned revenue. Non-standard warranty includes services incremental to the standard 40-hour per week coverage for 12 months. Non-standard warranty is recognized ratably as revenue when the applicable warranty term period commences.
The deferred system profit balance equals the value of products that have been shipped and billed to customers which have not met our revenue recognition criteria, less applicable product and warranty costs. Deferred system profit does not include the profit associated with product shipments to certain customers in Japan, to whom title does not transfer until customer acceptance. Shipments to such customers in Japan are classified as inventory at cost until the time of acceptance.
We enter into sales arrangements that may consist of multiple deliverables of our products and services where certain elementsbased on observable transactions when the products and services are sold on a standalone basis and those prices fall within a reasonable range. We typically have more than one SSP for individual products and services due to the stratification of these products by customers and circumstances. In these instances, we use information such as the size of the sales arrangement are not delivered and accepted in one reporting period. Judgment is required to properly identify the accounting unitscustomer, geographic region, as well as customization of the multiple deliverable transactions and toproducts in determining the SSP. In instances where the SSP is not directly observable, we determine the manner in which revenue should be allocated amongSSP using information that includes market conditions, entity-specific factors, including discounting strategies, information about the accounting units. Additionally, judgmentcustomer or class of customer that is required to interpret various commercial termsreasonably available and determine when all criteria of revenue recognition have been met in order for revenue recognition to occur in the appropriate accounting period.other observable inputs. While changes in the allocation of the estimated selling priceSSP between the accounting unitsperformance obligations will not affect the amount of total revenue recognized for a particular arrangement,contract, any material changes in these allocations could impact the timing of revenue recognition, which could have a material effect on our financial position and resultsresult of operations.
Although the products are generally not sold with a right of return, we may provide other credits or sales incentives, which are accounted for either as variable consideration or material right, depending on the specific terms and conditions of the arrangement. These credits and incentives are estimated at contract inception and updated at the end of each reporting period if and when additional information becomes available.
As outlined above, we use judgments to evaluate whether or not the customer has obtained control of the product and considers the several indicators in evaluating whether or not control has transferred to the customer. Not all of the indicators need to be met for us to conclude that control has transferred to the customer.
Contract Assets/Liabilities
The timing of revenue recognition, billings and cash collections may result in accounts receivable, contract assets, and contract liabilities (deferred revenue) on our Consolidated Balance Sheets. A receivable is recorded in the period we deliver products or provide services when we have an unconditional right to payment. Contract assets primarily relate to the value of products and services transferred to the customer for which the right to payment is not just dependent on the passage of time. Contract assets are transferred to receivable when rights to payment become unconditional.
A contract liability is recognized when we receive payment or have an unconditional right to payment in advance of the satisfaction of performance. The contract liabilities represent (1) deferred product revenue related to the value of products that have been shipped and billed to customers and for which the control has not been transferred to the customers, and (2) deferred service revenue, which is recorded when we receive consideration, or such consideration is unconditionally due, from a customer prior to transferring services to the customer under the terms of a contract. Deferred service revenue typically results from warranty services, and maintenance and other service contracts.

Contract assets and liabilities related to rights and obligations in a contract are recorded net in the Consolidated Balance Sheets. Upon the adoption of ASC 606, deferred costs of revenue are included in other current assets while under the legacy guidance deferred costs of revenue was included in deferred system profit.
Business Combinations. Accounting for business combinations requires management to make significant estimates and assumptions to determine the fair values of assets acquired and liabilities assumed at the acquisition date. Although we believe the assumptions and estimates we have made in the past have been reasonable and appropriate, they are based, in part, on historical experience and information obtained from management of the acquired companies and are inherently uncertain. Critical estimates in valuing certain acquired intangible assets include, but are not limited to future expected cash flows including revenue growth rate assumptions from product sales, customer contracts and acquired technologies, expected costs to develop in-process research and development into commercially viable products, estimated cash flows from the projects when completed, including assumptions associated with the technology migration curve, estimated royalty rates used in valuing technology related intangible assets, and discount rates. The discount rates used to discount expected future cash flows to present value are typically derived from a weighted-average cost of capital analysis and adjusted to reflect inherent risks. Unanticipated events and circumstances may occur that could affect either the accuracy or validity of such assumptions, estimates or actual results.
We allocate the fair value of the purchase price of our acquisitions to the tangible assets acquired, liabilities assumed, and intangible assets acquired, including in-process research and development (“IPR&D”), based on their estimated fair values. The excess of the fair value of the purchase price over the fair values of these net tangible and intangible assets acquired is recorded as goodwill. Management’s estimates of fair value are based upon assumptions believed to be reasonable, but our estimates and assumptions are inherently uncertain and subject to refinement. As a result, during the measurement period, which will not exceed one year from the acquisition date, we record adjustments to the assets acquired and liabilities assumed with the corresponding offset to goodwill. Upon the conclusion of the measurement period or final determination of the fair value of the purchase price of our acquisitions, whichever comes first, any subsequent adjustments are recorded to our Consolidated Statements of Operations.
The fair value of IPR&D is initially capitalized as an intangible asset with an indefinite life and assessed for impairment thereafter whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying value of the IPR&D assets may not be recoverable. Impairment of IPR&D is recorded to research and development expenses. When an IPR&D project is completed, the IPR&D is reclassified as an amortizable purchased intangible asset and amortized to costs of revenues over the asset’s estimated useful life.
Acquisition-related expenses are recognized separately from the business combination and are expensed as incurred.
Inventories. Inventories are stated at the lower of cost (on a first-in, first-out basis) or market.net realizable value. Net realizable value is the estimated selling prices in the ordinary course of business, less reasonably predictable costs of completion, disposal and transportation. Demonstration units are stated at their manufacturing cost and written down to their net realizable value. We review and set standard costs semi-annually at current manufacturing costs in order to approximate actual costs. Our manufacturing overhead standards for product costs are calculated assuming full absorption of forecasted spending over projected volumes, adjusted for excess capacity. Abnormal inventory costs such as costs of idle facilities, excess freight and handling costs, and spoilage are recognized as current period charges. We write down product inventory based on forecasted demand and technological obsolescence and service spare parts inventory based on forecasted usage. These factors are impacted by market and economic conditions, technology changes, new product introductions and changes in strategic direction and require estimates that may include uncertain elements. Actual demand may differ from forecasted demand, and such differences may have a material effect on recorded inventory values.
Warranty. We provide standard warranty coverage on our systems for 40 hours per week for 12 months, providing labor and parts necessary to repair and maintain the systems during the warranty period. We account for the estimated warranty cost as a charge to costs of revenues when revenue is recognized. The estimated warranty cost is based on historical product performance and field expenses. Utilizing actual service records, we calculate the average service hours and parts expense per system and apply the actual labor and overhead rates to determine the estimated warranty charge. We update these estimated charges on a regular basis. The actual product performance and/or field expense profiles may differ, and in those cases we adjust our warranty accruals accordingly. See Note 13, “Commitments and Contingencies” to the Consolidated Financial Statements for additional details.

Allowance for Doubtful Accounts. A majority of our accounts receivablesreceivable are derived from sales to large multinational semiconductor manufacturers throughout the world. In order to monitor potential credit losses, we perform ongoing credit evaluations of our customers’ financial condition. An allowance for doubtful accounts is maintained for probable credit losses based upon our assessment of the expected collectibility of the accounts receivable. The allowance for doubtful accounts is reviewed on a quarterly basis to assess the adequacy of the allowance. We take into consideration (1) any circumstances of which we are aware of a customer’s inability to meet its financial obligations; and (2) our judgments as to prevailing economic conditions in the industry and their impact on our customers. If circumstances change, such that the financial conditions of our customers are adversely affected and they are unable to meet their financial obligations to us, we may need to record additional allowances, which would result in a reduction of our net income.

Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation Plans. We account for stock-based awards granted to employees for services based on the fair value of those awards. The fair value of stock-based awards is measured at the grant date and is recognized as expense over the employee’s requisite service period. The fair value for restricted stock units granted without “dividend equivalent” rights is determined using the closing price of our common stock on the grant date, adjusted to exclude the present value of dividends which are not accrued on the restricted stock units. The fair value for restricted stock units granted with “dividend equivalent” rights is determined using the closing price of our common stock on the grant date. The award holder is not entitled to receive payments under dividend equivalent rights unless the associated restricted stock unit award vests (i.e., the award holder is entitled to receive credits, payable in cash or shares of our common stock, equal to the cash dividends that would have been received on the shares of our common stock underlying the restricted stock units had the shares been issued and outstanding on the dividend record date, but such dividend equivalents are only paid subject to the recipient satisfying the vesting requirements of the underlying award). Compensation expense for restricted stock units with performance metrics is calculated based upon expected achievement of the metrics specified in the grant, or when a grant contains a market condition, the grant date fair value using a Monte Carlo simulation. The Monte Carlo simulation incorporates estimates of the potential outcomes of the market condition on the grant date fair value of each award. Additionally, we estimate forfeitures based on historical experience and revise those estimates in subsequent periods if actual forfeitures differ from the estimated amounts. The fair value is determined using a Black-Scholes valuation model for purchase rights under our Employee Stock Purchase Plan. The Black-Scholes option-pricing model requires the input of assumptions, including the option’s expected term and the expected price volatility of the underlying stock. The expected stock price volatility assumption is based on the market-based historical implied volatility from traded options of our common stock.
Accounting for Cash-Based Long-Term Incentive Compensation. Cash-based long-term incentive (“Cash LTI”) awards issued to employees under our Cash LTI program vest in three or four equal installments, with one-third or one-fourth of the aggregate amount of the Cash LTI award vesting on each yearly anniversary of the grant date over a three or four-year period. In order to receive payments under a Cash LTI award, participants must remain employed by us as of the applicable award vesting date. Compensation expense related to the Cash LTI awards is recognized over the vesting term, which is adjusted for the impact of estimated forfeitures.
Contingencies and Litigation. We are subject to the possibility of losses from various contingencies. Considerable judgment is necessary to estimate the probability and amount of any loss from such contingencies. An accrual is made when it is probable that a liability has been incurred or an asset has been impaired and the amount of loss can be reasonably estimated. We accrue a liability and recognize as expense the estimated costs expected to be incurred over the next twelve months to defend or settle asserted and unasserted claims existing as of the balance sheet date. See Note 13,14, “Commitments and Contingencies” and Note 14,15, “Litigation and Other Legal Matters” to theour Consolidated Financial Statements for additional details.
Goodwill and Purchased Intangible Assets. We assess goodwill for impairment annually as well as whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying value may not be recoverable. Long-lived purchased intangible assets are tested for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that their carrying amounts may not be recoverable. See Note 6,7, “Goodwill and Purchased Intangible Assets” to the Consolidated Financial Statements for additional details. Goodwill represents the excess of the purchase price over the fair value of the net tangible and identifiable intangible assets acquired in each business combination. We performed our annual qualitative assessment of the goodwill by reporting unit in our secondduring the third quarter of the fiscal year ended June 30, 20172019 and concluded that there was no impairment. There have beenIn addition, as a result of the Orbotech Acquisition, we updated our organizational structure and performed a qualitative assessment of the goodwill for our reporting units, which were impacted by the organizational change, and concluded that there were no significant events or circumstancesimpairment indicators affecting the valuation of goodwill subsequent to our annual impairment test. The next annual evaluation of the goodwill by reporting unit will be performed in the secondthird quarter of the fiscal year ending June 30, 2018.2020.
If we were to encounter challenging economic conditions, such as a decline in our operating results, an unfavorable industry or macroeconomic environment, a substantial decline in our stock price, or any other adverse change in market conditions, we may be required to perform the two-step quantitative goodwill impairment analysis. In addition, if such conditions have the effect of changing one of the critical assumptions or estimates we use to calculate the value of our goodwill or intangible assets, we may be required to record goodwill and/or intangible asset impairment charges in future periods.periods, whether in connection with our next annual impairment assessment or prior to that, if any triggering event occurs outside of the quarter during which the annual goodwill impairment assessment is performed. It is not possible at this time to determine if any such future impairment charge would occur or, if it does, whether such charge would be material to our results of operations.

Income Taxes. We account for income taxes in accordance with the authoritative guidance, which requires that deferredincome tax effects for changes in tax laws are recognized in the period in which the law is enacted.
Transition tax liability is recognized in the period when the change in the U.S. tax law was enacted and the income tax effects are recorded as a component of provision for income taxes from continuing operations. Several inputs were considered in the calculation, such as the calculation of the post-1986 foreign earnings and profit (“E&P”), income tax pools for all foreign subsidiaries, and the amount of those earnings held in cash and other specified assets. We applied the current interpretations from the U.S. federal and state governments and regulatory organization in its calculation of the transition tax liability.

Deferred tax assets and liabilities beare recognized using enacted tax rates for the effect of temporary differences between the book and tax bases of recorded assets and liabilities. The guidance also requires that deferred tax assets be reduced by a valuation allowance if it is more likely than not that a portion of the deferred tax asset will not be realized. We have determined that a valuation allowance is necessary against a portion of the deferred tax assets, but we anticipate that our future taxable income will be sufficient to recover the remainder of our deferred tax assets. However, should there be a change in our ability to recover our deferred tax assets that are not subject to a valuation allowance, we could be required to record an additional valuation allowance against such deferred tax assets. This would result in an increase to our tax provision in the period in which we determine that the recovery is not probable.
On a quarterly basis, we provide for income taxes based upon an estimated annual effective income tax rate. The effective tax rate is highly dependent upon the geographic composition of worldwide earnings, tax regulations governing each region, availability of tax credits and the effectiveness of our tax planning strategies. We carefully monitor the changes in many factors and adjust our effective income tax rate on a timely basis. If actual results differ from these estimates, this could have a material effect on our financial condition and results of operations.
In addition, theThe calculation of our tax liabilities involves dealing with uncertainties in the application of complex tax regulations. In accordance with the authoritative guidance on accounting for uncertainty in income taxes, we recognize liabilities for uncertain tax positions based on the two-step process. The first step is to evaluate the tax position for recognition by determining if the weight of available evidence indicates that it is more likely than not that the position will be sustained in audit, including resolution of related appeals or litigation processes, if any. The second step is to measure the tax benefit as the largest amount that is more than 50% likely of being realized upon ultimate settlement. We reevaluate these uncertain tax positions on a quarterly basis. This evaluation is based on factors including, but not limited to, changes in facts or circumstances, changes in tax law, effectively settled issues under audit and new audit activity. Any change in these factors could result in the recognition of a tax benefit or an additional charge to the tax provision.
We record income taxes on the undistributed earnings of foreign subsidiaries unless the subsidiaries’ earnings are considered indefinitely reinvested outside the U.S. Our effective tax rate would be adversely affected if we change our intent or if such undistributed earnings are needed for U.S. operations because we would be required to provide or pay income taxes on some or all of these undistributed earnings.
Global Intangible Low-Taxed Income. The Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (the “Act”) includes provisions for Global Intangible Low-Taxed Income (“GILTI”) wherein taxes on foreign income are imposed in excess of a deemed return on tangible assets of foreign corporations. This income will effectively be taxed at a 10.5% tax rate in general. As a result, our deferred tax assets and liabilities were being evaluated to determine if the deferred tax assets and liabilities should be recognized for the basis differences expected to reverse as a result of GILTI provisions that are effective for us after the fiscal year ending June 30, 2018, or should the tax on GILTI provisions be recognized as period costs in each year incurred. We elected to account for GILTI as a component of current period tax expense starting from the first quarter of the fiscal year ending June 30, 2019.
Valuation of Marketable Securities. Our investments in available-for-sale securities are reported at fair value. Unrealized gains related to increases in the fair value of investments and unrealized losses related to decreases in the fair value are included in accumulated other comprehensive income (loss), net of tax, as reported on our Consolidated Statements of Stockholders’ Equity. However, changes in the fair value of investments impact our net income only when such investments are sold or an impairment charge is recognized. Realized gains and losses on the sale of securities are determined by specific identification of the security’s cost basis. We periodically review our investment portfolio to determine if any investment is other-than-temporarily impaired due to changes in credit risk or other potential valuation concerns, which would require us to record an impairment charge in the period during which any such determination is made. In making this judgment, we evaluate, among other things, the duration of the investment, the extent to which the fair value of an investment is less than its cost, the credit rating and any changes in credit rating for the investment, default and loss rates of the underlying collateral, structure and credit enhancements to determine if a credit loss may exist. Our assessment that an investment is not other-than-temporarily impaired could change in the future due to new developments or changes in our strategies or assumptions related to any particular investment.
Recent Accounting Pronouncements
For a description of recent accounting pronouncements, including those recently adopted and the expected dates of adoption as well as estimated effects, if any, on our consolidated financial statementsConsolidated Financial Statements of those not yet adopted, see Note 1, “Description of Business and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies” of the Notesnotes to our Consolidated Financial Statements.


EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
KLA-Tencor Corporation is a leading supplier of process control and yield management solutions for the semiconductor and related nanoelectronics industries. Our broad portfolio of inspection and metrology products, and related service, software and other offerings primarily supports integrated circuit (“IC” or “chip”) manufacturers throughout the entire semiconductor fabrication process, from research and development to final volume production. We provide leading-edge equipment, software and support that enable IC manufacturers to identify, resolve and manage significant advanced technology manufacturing process challenges and obtain higher finished product yields at lower overall cost. In addition to serving the semiconductor industry, we also provide a range of technology solutions to a number of other high technology industries, including advanced packaging, light emitting diode (LED”), power devices, compound semiconductor, and data storage industries, as well as general materials research.
Our products and services are used by the vast majority of bare wafer, IC, lithography reticle (“reticle” or “mask”) and disk manufacturers around the world. Our products, services and expertise are used by our customers to measure, detect, analyze and resolve critical product defects that arise in that environment in order to control nanometric level manufacturing processes. Our revenues are driven largely by our customers’ spending on capital equipment and related maintenance services necessary to support key transitions in their underlying product technologies, or to increase their production volumes in response to market demand or expansion plans. Our semiconductor customers generally operate in one or more of the three major semiconductor markets - memory, foundry and logic. All three of these markets are characterized by rapid technological changes and sudden shifts in end-user demand, which influence the level and pattern of our customers’ spending on our products and services. Although capital spending in all three semiconductor markets has historically been cyclical, the demand for more advanced and lower cost chips used in a growing number of consumer electronics, communications, data processing, and industrial and automotive products has resulted over the long term in a favorable demand environment for our process control and yield management solutions, particularly in the foundry and logic markets, which have higher levels of process control adoption than the memory market.
As we are a supplier to the global semiconductor and semiconductor-related industries, our customer base continues to become more highly concentrated over time, thereby increasing the potential impact of a sudden change in capital spending by a major customer on our revenues and profitability. As our customer base becomes increasingly more concentrated, large orders from a relatively limited number of customers account for a substantial portion of our sales, which potentially exposes us to more volatility for revenues and earnings. In the global semiconductor and semiconductor-related industries, China is emerging as a major region for manufacturing of logic and memory chips, adding to its role as the world’s largest consumer of ICs. Government initiatives are propelling China to expand its domestic manufacturing capacity and attracting semiconductor manufacturers from Taiwan, Korea, Japan and the US. China is currently seen as an important long-term growth region for the semiconductor capital equipment sector. We are also subject to the cyclical capital spending that has historically characterized the semiconductor and semiconductor-related industries. The timing, length, intensity and volatility of the capacity-oriented capital spending cycles of our customers are unpredictable.
The semiconductor industry has also been characterized by constant technological innovation. Currently, there are multiple drivers for growth in the industry with increased demand for chips providing computation power and connectivity for AI applications and support for mobile devices at the leading edge of foundry chip manufacturing. Qualification of early EUV lithography processes and equipment is driving growth at leading logic/foundry and DRAM manufacturers. Expansion of the IoT together with increasing acceptance of ADAS in anticipation of the introduction of autonomous cars have begun to accelerate legacy-node technology conversions and capacity expansions. Intertwined in these areas, spurred by data storage and connectivity needs, is the growth in demand for memory chips. On the other hand, higher design costs for the most advanced ICs could economically constrain leading-edge manufacturing technology customers to focus their resources on only the large technologically advanced products and applications. We believe that, over the long term, our customers will continue to invest in advanced technologies and new materials to enable smaller design rules and higher density applications that fuel demand for process control equipment, although the growth for such equipment may be adversely impacted by higher design costs for advanced ICs, reuse of installed products, and delays in production ramps by our customers in response to higher costs and technical challenges at more advanced technology nodes.

The demand for our products and our revenue levels are driven by our customers’ needs to solve the process challenges that they face as they adopt new technologies required to fabricate advanced ICs that are incorporated into sophisticated mobile devices. The timing for our customers in ordering and taking delivery of process control and yield management equipment is also determined by our customers’ requirements to meet the next generation production ramp schedules, and the timing for capacity expansion to meet end customer demand. Our earnings will depend not only on our revenue levels, but also on the amount of research and development spending required to meet our customers’ technology roadmaps. We have maintained production volumes and capacity to meet anticipated customer requirements and remain at risk of incurring significant inventory-related and other restructuring charges if business conditions deteriorate. Over the past year, our customers have taken delivery of higher volumes of process control equipment than they did in the previous year. However, any delay or push out by our customers in taking delivery of process control and yield management equipment may cause earnings volatility, due to increases in the risk of inventory related charges as well as timing of revenue recognition.
On October 20, 2015, we entered into an Agreement and Plan of Merger and Reorganization (the “Merger Agreement” or “Merger”) with Lam Research Corporation (“Lam Research”) which was subject to regulatory approvals. On October 5, 2016, we mutually agreed to terminate the Merger Agreement and no termination fees were payable by either party in connection with the termination.
The following table sets forth some of our key consolidated financial information for each of our last three fiscal years:
 Year ended June 30,
(Dollar amounts in thousands, except diluted net income per share)2017 2016 2015
Total revenues$3,480,014
 $2,984,493
 $2,814,049
Costs of revenues$1,287,547
 $1,163,391
 $1,215,229
Gross margin percentage63% 61% 57%
Net income$926,076
 $704,422
 $366,158
Diluted net income per share$5.88
 $4.49
 $2.24

Total revenues during the fiscal year ended June 30, 2017 increased by 17% compared to the fiscal year ended June 30, 2016. Our year over year revenue growth reflected increases from sales of both our inspection and metrology products as our customers continue to invest in process control and services. Increased revenues during the fiscal year ended June 30, 2017 were also driven by strong demand from our foundry customers and an increase in the number of post-warranty systems installed at our customers’ sites over this time period for our service revenues.
Total revenues during the fiscal year ended June 30, 2016 increased by 6% compared to the fiscal year ended June 30, 2015. Our year over year revenue growth reflected increases from sales of both our inspection and metrology products as our customers continue to invest in process control and services. Increased revenues during the fiscal year ended June 30, 2016 were also driven by the introduction of our new generation of inspection products as well strong demand from our foundry customers and an increase in the number of post-warranty systems installed at our customers’ sites over this time period for our service revenues.
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
Revenues and Gross Margin 
On July 1, 2018, we adopted ASC 606 using the modified retrospective transition approach. Results for reporting periods beginning after June 30, 2018 are presented under ASC 606, while prior period amounts are presented under legacy guidance. For additional details, refer to Note 2 “Revenue” to our Consolidated Financial Statements.
Year ended June 30,        Year ended June 30,        
(Dollar amounts in thousands)2017 2016 2015 FY17 vs. FY16 FY16 vs. FY152019 2018 2017 FY19 vs. FY18 FY18 vs. FY17
Revenues:                          
Product$2,703,934
 $2,250,260
 $2,125,396
 $453,674
 20% $124,864
 6 %$3,392,243
 $3,160,671
 $2,703,934
 $231,572
 7% $456,737
 17%
Service776,080
 734,233
 688,653
 41,847
 6% 45,580
 7 %1,176,661
 876,030
 776,080
 300,631
 34% 99,950
 13%
Total revenues$3,480,014
 $2,984,493
 $2,814,049
 $495,521
 17% $170,444
 6 %$4,568,904
 $4,036,701
 $3,480,014
 $532,203
 13% $556,687
 16%
Costs of revenues$1,287,547
 $1,163,391
 $1,215,229
 $124,156
 11% $(51,838) (4)%$1,869,377
 $1,446,041
 $1,286,215
 $423,336
 29% $159,826
 12%
Gross margin percentage63% 61% 57% 2%   4%  59% 64% 63% (5)%   1%  
Product revenues
Our business is affected by the concentration of our customer base and our customers’ capital equipment procurement schedules as a result of their investment plans. Our product revenues in any particular period are significantly impacted by the amount of new orders that we receive during that period and, depending upon the duration of manufacturing and installation cycles, in the preceding period.

ProductThe increase in product revenues increased by 20%7% in the fiscal year ended June 30, 20172019 compared to the fiscalprior year ended June 30, 2016,is primarily attributable to product revenue from our newly acquired Orbotech business, increased investments from our foundry and wafer customers, and a favorable impact from the adoption of ASC 606 due to growth in revenues from our customers in Korea, Taiwan, and Europe & Israel. Our year over year increase in our product revenues were primarily driven by strong demand for our inspection and metrology products, increased investments by our foundry customers to support their new device architectures and process technologies for capacity-related expansion, and salesearlier timing of our next generation inspection products.
Product revenues increased by 6% in the fiscal year ended June 30, 2016 compared to the fiscal year ended June 30, 2015, primarily due to growth in revenues from our customers in China, Taiwan and Japan,transfer of control, partially offset by a lower revenues from ourproducts shipments to customers in North America, Korea, Rest of Asia and Europe & Israel. The year over year increase in our product revenues were primarily driven by strong demand for our inspection and metrology products, the introduction of our new generation of inspection products and the expansion of semiconductor investments in Asia, particularly in China and Taiwan from our foundry customers.memory business.
Service revenues
Service revenues are generated from product maintenance contracts,and support services, as well as billable time and material service calls made to our customers after the expiration of the warranty period.customers. The amount of our service revenues is typically a function of the number of post-warranty systems installed at our customers’ sites and the utilization of those systems, but it is also impacted by other factors, such as our rate of service contract renewals, the types of systems being serviced and fluctuations in foreign exchange rates. Service
The increase in service revenues increased sequentially overby 34% in the fiscal yearsyear ended June 30, 2015, 20162019 compared to the prior year is primarily attributable to service revenues from our newly acquired Orbotech business, the impact of adoption of ASC 606 whereby revenue from the standard warranty represents a separate performance obligation and 2017, primarily as a result ofincluded in our services revenue, and an increase over timein the number of systems installed at our customers’ sites.
Revenues by segment(1)
 Year ended June 30,        
(Dollar amounts in thousands)2019 2018 2017 FY19 vs. FY18 FY18 vs. FY17
Revenues:             
Semiconductor Process Control$4,080,822
 $3,944,015
 $3,408,876
 $136,807
 3% $535,139
 16%
Specialty Semiconductor Process151,164
 
 
 151,164
 
(3) 

 
 
(3) 

PCB, Display and Component Inspection(2)
332,810
 92,516
 71,557
 240,294
 
(3) 

 20,959
 
(3) 

Other4,676
 
 
 4,676
 
(3) 

 
 
(3) 

Total revenues$4,569,472
 $4,036,531
 $3,480,433
 $532,941
 
(3) 

 $556,098
 
(3) 

__________
(1)Segment revenues exclude corporate allocation and the effects of foreign exchange rates. For additional details, refer to Note 17, “Segment Reporting and Geographic Information” to our Consolidated Financial Statements.
(2)Segment revenues for the fiscal years ended June 30, 2018 and 2017 include the component inspection business only.
(3)No meaningful comparative information exists for the prior periods.

Fiscal Year 2019 compared with Fiscal Year 2018
Revenue from our Semiconductor Process Control segment increased by 3% primarily due to a strong demand from our customers in the patterning business, and growth in service revenues. The increase in revenues from Specialty Semiconductor Process, PCB, Display and Component Inspection and Other segments primarily relates to the Orbotech business which was acquired in February of 2019.
Fiscal Year 2018 compared with Fiscal Year 2017
Revenue from our Semiconductor Process Control segment increased by 16%, primarily due to increases from sales of both our wafer inspection and patterning products as our customers continue to invest in the process control and services, and an increase in the number of post-warranty systems installed at our customers’ sites over thatthis time period.
Revenues - Top Customers
The following customers each accounted for more than 10% of our total revenues primarily in Semiconductor Process Control segment for the indicated periods:
Year ended June 30,
2017 2016 2015
Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. Micron Technology, Inc. Intel Corporation
2019 2018 2017
Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company Limited Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company Limited Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.
 Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company Limited 
 Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company Limited
Revenues by region
Revenues by region for the periods indicated were as follows:
Year ended June 30,Year ended June 30,
(Dollar amounts in thousands)2017 2016 20152019 2018 2017
China$1,215,807
 27% $643,033
 16% $412,098
 12%
Taiwan$1,104,307
 32% $894,557
 30% $691,482
 25%1,105,726
 24% 636,363
 16% 1,104,307
 32%
North America596,452
 13% 494,330
 12% 523,024
 14%
Korea688,094
 20% 367,905
 12% 405,320
 14%584,091
 13% 1,178,601
 29% 688,094
 20%
North America523,024
 14% 521,335
 18% 815,914
 29%
China412,098
 12% 430,074
 14% 162,669
 6%
Japan351,202
 10% 444,216
 15% 426,963
 15%581,529
 13% 638,358
 16% 351,202
 10%
Europe & Israel263,789
 8% 167,936
 6% 194,670
 7%305,924
 7% 300,883
 7% 263,789
 8%
Rest of Asia137,500
 4% 158,470
 5% 117,031
 4%179,375
 3% 145,133
 4% 137,500
 4%
Total$3,480,014
 100% $2,984,493
 100% $2,814,049
 100%$4,568,904
 100% $4,036,701
 100% $3,480,014
 100%
A significant portion of our revenues continues to be generated in Asia, where a substantial portion of the world’s semiconductor manufacturing capacity is located, and we expect that trend to continue.

Gross margin
Our gross margin fluctuates with revenue levels and product mix and is affected by variations in costs related to manufacturing and servicing our products, including our ability to scale our operations efficiently and effectively in response to prevailing business conditions.

The following table summarizes the major factors that contributed to the changes in gross margin percentage:
 Gross Margin Percentage
Fiscal year ended June 30, 2015201756.863.0 %
Revenue volume of products and services0.40.8 %
Mix of products and services sold2.60.9 %
Manufacturing labor, overhead and efficiencies0.7(0.4)%
Other service and manufacturing costs0.5(0.2)%
Fiscal year ended June 30, 2016201861.064.1 %
Revenue volume of products and services1.5(1.0)%
Mix of products and services sold0.60.7 %
Manufacturing labor, overhead and efficiencies(1.6)%
Other service and manufacturing costs(0.10.5)%
Impact from acquisition of Orbotech(2.6)%
Fiscal year ended June 30, 2017201963.059.1 %
Changes in gross margin percentage, which are driven by the revenue volume of products and services, reflect our ability to leverage existing infrastructure to generate higher revenues. It also includes the effect of fluctuations in foreign exchange rates, average customer pricing and customer revenue deferrals associated with volume purchase agreements. Changes in gross margin percentage from the mix of products and services sold, reflect the impact of changes inwithin the composition withinof product and service offerings.offerings, and amortization of inventory fair value adjustments from business combinations. Changes in gross margin percentage from manufacturing labor, overhead and efficiencies reflect our ability to manage costs and drive productivity as we scale our manufacturing activity to respond to customer requirements; this includes the impactrequirements, and amortization of capacity utilization, use of overtime and variability of cost structure.intangible assets. Changes in gross margin percentage from other service and manufacturing costs include the impact of customer support costs, including the efficiencies with which we deliver services to our customers, and the effectiveness with which we manage our production plans and inventory risk.
OurThe decrease in our gross margin increased to 63.0%59.1% from 64.1% during the fiscal year ended June 30, 2017 from 61.0% during2019 is primarily attributable to the fiscal year ended June 30, 2016, primarily due toacquisition of Orbotech, which historically had lower product gross margins, an increase in service and manufacturing costs, and a higherlower revenue volume of products and services andservices. These trends were partially offset by a favorable mix of products and services sold, partially offset by other service and manufacturing costs.sold.
OurSegment gross margin(1)
 Year ended June 30,        
(Dollar amounts in thousands)2019 2018 2017 FY19 vs. FY18 FY18 vs. FY17
Segment gross margin:             
Semiconductor Process Control$2,590,434
 $2,554,223
 $2,160,747
 $36,211
 1% $393,476
 18%
Specialty Semiconductor Process78,800
 
 
 78,800
 
(3) 

 
 
(3) 

PCB, Display and Component Inspection(2)
155,765
 38,428
 30,914
 117,337
 
(3) 

 7,514
 
(3) 

Other1,102
 
 
 1,102
 
(3) 

 
 
(3) 

 $2,826,101
 $2,592,651
 $2,191,661
 $233,450
 
(3) 

 $400,990
 
(3) 

_________________ 
(1)Segment gross margin is calculated as segment revenues less segment cost of revenues and excludes corporate allocation and the effects of foreign exchange rates, amortization of intangible assets, inventory fair value adjustments, and acquisition related costs. For additional details, refer to Note 17, “Segment Reporting and Geographic Information” to our Consolidated Financial Statements.
(2)Segment gross margin in the fiscal year ended June 30, 2018 and 2017 include the component inspection business only.
(3)No meaningful comparative information exists for the prior periods.

Fiscal Year 2019 compared with Fiscal Year 2018
The primary factors impacting the performance of our segment gross margins are summarized as follows:
Semiconductor Process Control segment gross margin increasedremained relatively consistent from prior years.
The segment gross margins of Specialty Semiconductor Process, PCB, Display and Component Inspection and Other segments primarily relate to 61.0% during the fiscal year ended June 30, 2016 from 56.8% duringOrbotech business, which was acquired in February 2019.
Fiscal Year 2018 compared with Fiscal Year 2017
The primary factors impacting the fiscal year ended June 30, 2015,performance of our segment gross margins are summarized as follows:
Semiconductor Process Control segment gross margin increased primarily due to a favorable mix of products and services sold, an increase in manufacturing efficiencies driven by lower warranty costs as well as a decrease in severance-related expenses, and higher revenue volume of products and services.services, and lower customer support costs, partially offset by higher manufacturing and service costs to support increased volume of product shipments.
There were no segment gross margins in Specialty Semiconductor Process and Other segments as both segments relate to the Orbotech business, which was acquired in February 2019.
Research and Development (“R&D”) 
Year ended June 30,        Year ended June 30,        
(Dollar amounts in thousands)2017 2016 2015 FY17 vs. FY16 FY16 vs. FY152019 2018 2017 FY19 vs. FY18 FY18 vs. FY17
R&D expenses$526,870
 $481,258
 $530,616
 $45,612
 9% $(49,358) (9)%$711,030
 $608,531
 $526,688
 $102,499
 17% $81,843
 16%
R&D expenses as a percentage of total revenues15% 16% 19% (1)%   (3)%  16% 15% 15% 1%   %  
R&D expenses may fluctuate with product development phases and project timing as well as our focused R&D efforts that are aligned with our overall business strategy.efforts. As technological innovation is essential to our success, we may incur significant costs associated with R&D projects, including compensation for engineering talent, engineering material costs, and other expenses.

R&D expenses during the fiscal year ended June 30, 20172019 were higher compared to the fiscal year ended June 30, 2016,2018, primarily due to an increase in employee-related expenses of $25.4$36.2 million as a result of additional engineering headcount higher variable compensation, and higher employee benefit costs, an increase in consulting expenses of $12.5 million, an increase in engineering materials and supplies expenses of $9.9 million, an increase in merger-related expenses of $2.3 million, a lower benefit from external funding of $1.9 million and higher travel-related costs of $1.2 million, partially offset by a decrease in depreciation expense of $7.3$5.1 million, and lower severance-related charges$55.7 million of $1.5 million.
R&D expenses duringfrom the fiscal year ended June 30, 2016 were lower compared to the fiscal year ended June 30, 2015, primarily due to a decrease in employee-related expenses, including severance-related expenses of $33.9 million as a result of the reduced headcount from our global workforce reduction that we initiated during the three months ended June 30, 2015, partially offset by an increase in variable compensation of $10.6 million. Additionally, there was a decrease in engineering materials and supplies expenses of $21.0 million and an increase in the benefit to R&D expense from external funding of $5.4 million.Orbotech business.
Our future operating results will depend significantly on our ability to produce products and provide services that have a competitive advantage in our marketplace. To do this, we believe that we must continue to make substantial and focused investments in our research and development. We remain committed to product development in new and emerging technologies as we address the yield challenges our customers face at future technology nodes.technologies.
Selling, General and Administrative (“SG&A”)
Year ended June 30,        Year ended June 30,        
(Dollar amounts in thousands)2017 2016 2015 FY17 vs. FY16 FY16 vs. FY152019 2018 2017 FY19 vs. FY18 FY18 vs. FY17
SG&A expenses$389,336
 $379,399
 $406,864
 $9,937
 3% $(27,465) (7)%$599,124
 $442,304
 $388,211
 $156,820
 35% $54,093
 14%
SG&A expenses as a percentage of total revenues11% 13% 14% (2)%   (1)%  13% 11% 11% 2%   %  
SG&A expenses during the fiscal year ended June 30, 20172019 were higher compared to the fiscal year ended June 30, 2016,2018, primarily due to an increase in consulting expenses of $7.1 million; an increase in employee-related expenses of $6.7 million mainly as a result of higher variable compensation and employee benefit costs; an increase in travel costs of $2.3 million; an increase in cost of support for sales evaluations of $1.3 million and an increase in facilities-related expense of $1.1 million. The increases above were partially offset by a decrease in merger-related expenses of $6.6 million and a lower severance-related charges of $3.7 million.
SG&A expenses during the fiscal year ended June 30, 2016 were lower compared to the fiscal year ended June 30, 2015, primarily due to a decrease in employee-related expenses, including severance-related expenses, of $28.0$11.1 million as a result of the reducedadditional headcount, from our global workforce reduction that we initiated during the three months ended June 30, 2015 partially offset byand higher employee benefit costs, an increase in variable compensation of $16.4 million, a decrease in cost of support for sales evaluation of $8.6 million, a decrease in contributions to support our corporate social responsibility program of $7.0 million and a decrease in travel-relatedacquisition-related expenses of $4.7 million. The decreases above were partially offset by an increase in our merger-related$22.0 million, $10.9 million of stock-based compensation expense acceleration for certain equity awards for Orbotech employees and $91.8 million of expenses from the Orbotech business, including $30.2 million of $15.6 million, principallyamortization expense for financial advisory services including the fairness opinion fees, employee-related expenses and legal fees during the fiscal year ended June 30, 2016.
Restructuring Charges
During the fourth quarter of the fiscal year ended 2015, we announced a plan to reduce our global employee workforce to streamline our organization and business processes in response to changing customer requirements in its industry. The goals of this reduction were to enable continued innovation, direct our resources toward its best opportunities and lower our ongoing expense run rate. We substantially completed our global workforce reduction during the fiscal year ended June 30, 2016.acquired intangible assets.

The following table shows the activity primarily related to accrual for severance and benefits for the fiscal years ended June 30, 2017, 2016 and 2015:
 Year ended June 30,
(In thousands)2017 2016 2015
Beginning balance$587
 $24,887
 $2,329
Restructuring costs
 8,926
 31,569
Adjustments(147) (142) 1,177
Cash payments(440) (33,084) (10,188)
Ending balance$
 $587
 $24,887

Interest Expense and Other Expense (Income), Net
 Year ended June 30,
(Dollar amounts in thousands)2017 2016 2015
Interest expense$122,476
 $122,887
 $106,009
Other expense (income), net$(19,461) $(20,634) $(10,469)
Interest expense as a percentage of total revenues4% 4% 4%
Other expense (income), net as a percentage of total revenues1% 1% %
During the fiscal year ended June 30, 2017 interest expense remained relatively unchanged compared to the fiscal year ended June 30, 2016.
 Year ended June 30,
(Dollar amounts in thousands)2019 2018 2017
Interest expense$124,604
 $114,376
 $122,476
Other expense (income), net$(31,462) $(30,482) $(16,822)
Interest expense as a percentage of total revenues3% 3% 4%
Other expense (income), net as a percentage of total revenues1% 1% %
The increase in interest expense during the fiscal year ended June 30, 20162019 compared to the fiscal year ended June 30, 20152018, was primarily attributabledue to interest on the $2.50$1.20 billion aggregate principal amount of senior, unsecured long-term notes (collectively referred to as “Senior Notes”), the $750.0 million unsecured prepayable term loans and the $500.0 million unfunded revolving credit facility which were executed during the three months ended December 31, 2014 and which were not outstanding for the entire fiscal year ended June 30, 2015. In addition, the $750.0 million of 2018 Senior Notes were redeemed during the three months ended December 31, 2014.issued in March 2019.
Other expense (income), net is comprised primarily of realized gains or losses on sales of marketable securities, gains or losses from revaluations of certain foreign currency denominated assets and liabilities as well as foreign currency contracts, impairments associated with equity investments in privately-held companies, interest relatedand interest-related accruals (such as interest and penalty accruals related to our tax obligations) and interest income earned on our investmentinvested cash, cash equivalents and cash portfolio.
The decrease in other expense (income), net during the fiscal year ended June 30, 2017 compared to the fiscal year ended June 30, 2016 was primarily due to an increase in interest accruals related to uncertain tax positions of $6.4 million, a decrease in net gains from our investments in privately-held companies of $3.6 million, partially offset by an increase in interest income of $8.8 million.marketable securities.
The increase in other expense (income), net during the fiscal year ended June 30, 20162019 compared to the fiscal year ended June 30, 20152018 was primarily due to reductionan increase in interest income of interest and penalty$3.7 million, partially offset by an increase in accruals related to uncertain tax positions of $5.5 million and an increase of $4.5 million for gain on the sale of equity investments in privately-held companies net of impairment charges.
Loss on extinguishment of debt and other, net
For the fiscal year ended June 30, 2015, loss on extinguishment of debt and other, net, reflected a pre-tax net loss of $131.7 million associated with the redemption of our $750.0 million of 2018 Senior Notes during the three months ended December 31, 2014. Included in the loss on extinguishment of debt and other, net is the $1.2 million gain on the non-designated forward contract that was entered into by us in anticipation of the redemption of the 2018 Senior Notes, which were redeemed during the three months ended December 31, 2014. Refer to “Note 7, Debt” and “Note 16, Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities” to the consolidated financial statements for further details. We had no loss on extinguishment of debt and other, net, in the fiscal years ended June 30, 2017 and 2016.$2.6 million.


Provision for Income Taxes
The following table provides details of income taxes:
Year ended June 30,Year ended June 30,
(Dollar amounts in thousands)2017 2016 20152019 2018 2017
Income before income taxes$1,173,246
 $858,192
 $434,131
$1,296,231
 $1,455,931
 $1,173,246
Provision for income taxes$247,170
 $153,770
 $67,973
$121,214
 $653,666
 $247,170
Effective tax rate21.1% 17.9% 15.7%9.4% 44.9% 21.1%
TheOur effective tax rate during the fiscal years ended June 30, 2019 and June 30, 2018 was impacted by the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (“the Act”), which was enacted into law on December 22, 2017. Income tax effects resulting from changes in tax laws are accounted for by us in accordance with the authoritative guidance, which requires that these tax effects be recognized in the period in which the law is enacted and the effects are recorded as a component of provision for income taxes differs from continuing operations. We have completed our accounting for the statutory U.S. federal rate primarily duetax effects of the enactment of the Act. As a result, we recorded a tax benefit of $19.3 million during the year ended June 30, 2019 relating to foreign income with lowerthe transition tax rates, tax credits, and other domestic incentives.liability provided by the Act.
Tax expense was lower as a percentage of income before taxes during the fiscal year ended June 30, 2017 was 21.1% compared to 17.9% for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2016. Tax expense as a percentage of income increased primarily due to an increase in the percentage of income earned in the U.S. compared to income earned outside the U.S. in jurisdictions with lower tax rates. Tax expense as a percentage of income increased also because there was a decrease in unrecognized tax benefits during the fiscal year ended June 30, 20162019 compared to the fiscal year ended June 30, 20172018 primarily due to settlements with taxing authorities and expirationthe impact of statutes of limitations.the following items:
Tax expense decreased by $49.9 million relating to the reduction of the U.S. federal corporate tax rate from 28.1% to 21% for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2019. The Act reduces the U.S. federal corporate tax rate from 35.0% to 21.0% as of January 1, 2018. The decrease in the U.S. federal corporate tax rate from 35.0% to 21.0% results in a percentageblended statutory tax rate of income28.1% for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2018;
Tax expense decreased by $320.2 million relating to the one -time transition tax recorded during the fiscal year ended June 30, 20162018 on our total post-1986 earnings and profits (“E&P”) of which, prior to the enactment of the Act, was 17.9% comparedpreviously deferred from U.S. income taxes; and
Tax expense decreased by $102.1 million relating to 15.7% forthe one-time re-measurement of our deferred tax assets and liabilities recorded during the fiscal year ended June 30, 2015. Tax expense as a percentage2018 based on the Act’s new corporate tax rate of income increased primarily due to an increase in the percentage of income earned in the U.S. compared to income earned outside the U.S. in jurisdictions with lower tax rates. During the fiscal year ended June 30, 2015, the loss on extinguishment of debt decreased income earned in the U.S.21.0%.
Our future effective income tax rate depends on various factors, such as tax legislation, the geographic composition of our pre-tax income, the amount of our pre-tax income as business activities fluctuate, non-deductible expenses incurred in connection with acquisitions, research and development credits as a percentage of aggregate pre-tax income, the domestic manufacturing deduction, non-taxable or non-deductible increases or decreases in the assets held within our Executive Deferred Savings Plan, the tax effects of employee stock activity, and the effectiveness of our tax planning strategies.

In the normal course of business, we are subject to examination by tax auditsauthorities throughout the world. We are subject to federal income tax examinations for all years beginning from the fiscal year ended June 30, 2016 and are under U.S. federal income tax examination for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2016. We are subject to state income tax examinations for all years beginning from the fiscal year ended June 30, 2015. We are also subject to examinations in variousother major foreign jurisdictions, including Singapore and such jurisdictions may assess additional income or other taxes against us.Israel, for all years beginning from the calendar year ended December 31, 2012. We are under income tax examinationaudit in IsraelGermany related to Orbotech for the fiscal years ended June 30,December 31, 2013 through June 30,to December 31, 2015. Although we believe our tax estimates are reasonable, the final determination of tax audits and any related litigation could be materially different from our historical income tax provisions and accruals. The results of an audit or litigation could have a material adverse effect on our results of operations or cash flows in the period or periods for which that determination is made.
In May 2017, Orbotech received an assessment from the ITA with respect to its fiscal years 2012 through 2014 (the “Assessment”, and the “Audit Period”, respectively), for an aggregate amount of tax against us, after offsetting all NOLs for tax purposes available through the end of 2014, of approximately NIS 218 million (approximately $61.0 million as of June 30, 2019), which amount includes related interest and linkage differentials to the Israeli consumer price index (as of date of the Assessment). We believe our recorded unrecognized tax benefits are sufficient to cover the resolution of the Assessment.
On August 31, 2018, Orbotech filed an objection in respect of the tax assessment (the “Objection”). Orbotech is now in the process of the second stage, in which the claims raised by it in the Objection are examined by different personnel at the Israel Tax Authority (“ITA”). In addition, the ITA can examine additional items and may assess additional amounts in the second stage. The second stage must be completed within one year of when the Objection was filed.

Liquidity and Capital Resources
As of June 30,As of June 30,
(Dollar amounts in thousands)2017 2016 20152019 2018 2017
Cash and cash equivalents$1,153,051
 $1,108,488
 $838,025
$1,015,994
 $1,404,382
 $1,153,051
Marketable securities1,863,689
 1,382,806
 1,549,086
723,391
 1,475,936
 1,863,689
Total cash, cash equivalents and marketable securities$3,016,740
 $2,491,294
 $2,387,111
$1,739,385
 $2,880,318
 $3,016,740
Percentage of total assets55% 50% 49%19% 51% 54%
          
Year ended June 30,Year ended June 30,
(In thousands)2017 2016 20152019 2018 2017
Cash flows:          
Net cash provided by operating activities$1,079,665
 $759,696
 $605,906
$1,152,632
 $1,229,120
 $1,079,665
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities(560,886) 144,687
 918,221
Net cash (used in) provided by investing activities(1,180,982) 291,618
 (560,886)
Net cash used in financing activities(472,805) (636,702) (1,302,972)(360,005) (1,270,103) (472,805)
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents(1,411) 2,782
 (13,991)(33) 696
 (1,411)
Net increase in cash and cash equivalents$44,563
 $270,463
 $207,164
Net (decrease) increase in cash and cash equivalents$(388,388) $251,331
 $44,563
Cash and Cash Equivalents and Marketable Securities:
As of June 30, 2017,2019, our cash, cash equivalents and marketable securities totaled $3.02$1.74 billion, which is an increaserepresents a decrease of $525.4 million$1.14 billion from June 30, 2016.2018. The increasedecrease is primarily attributablemainly due to $1.82 billion paid to fund Orbotech and other business acquisitions, payment of dividends and dividend equivalents of $472.3 million, and stock repurchases of $1.10 billion, partially offset by the net proceeds from our 2019 Senior Notes of $1.18 billion, our cash generated from operations partially offset byof $1.15 billion and net purchasesproceeds of $764.2 million from marketable securities of $493.2 million, payment of dividends of $344.0 million, payment of term loans of $130.0 million, cash used for a business acquisition of $28.6 million and payment for stock repurchases of $25.0 million.transactions. As of June 30, 2017, $2.16 billion2019, $669.3 million of our $3.02$1.74 billion of cash, cash equivalents, and marketable securities were held by our foreign subsidiaries and branch offices. We currently intend to indefinitely reinvest $2.00 billion$379.1 million of the cash, cash equivalents and marketable securities held by our foreign subsidiaries.subsidiaries for which we assert that earnings are permanently reinvested. If, however, a portion of these funds were to be repatriated to the United States, we would be required to accrue and pay U.S.state and foreign taxes of approximately 30%-50%1%-22% of the funds repatriated. The amount of taxes due will depend on the amount and manner of the repatriation, as well as the location from which the funds are repatriated. Of the $2.16 billion,We have accrued state and foreign tax on the remaining cash of $156.4$290.2 million isof the $669.3 million held by our foreign subsidiaries and branches for which earnings are not indefinitely reinvested.branch offices. As we have accrued (but not paid) U.S. taxes on the earnings of these subsidiaries and branches,such, these funds can be returned to the U.S. without accruing any additional U.S. tax expense.

Cash Dividends and Special Cash Dividend:
The total amount of regular quarterly cash dividends and dividends equivalents paid during the fiscal years ended June 30, 2019, 2018 and 2017 2016 and 2015 was $335.4$469.4 million, $324.5$395.6 million and $324.8$335.4 million, respectively. The increase in the amount of regular quarterly cash dividends and dividends equivalents paid during the fiscal year ended June 30, 20172019 reflected the increase in the level of our regular quarterly cash dividend from $0.52$0.59 to $0.54$0.75 per share that waswere instituted during the three months ended December 31, 2016.June 30, 2018. The amount of accrued dividendsdividend equivalents payable for regular quarterly cash dividends on unvested restricted stock units (“RSUs”) with dividend equivalent rights was $4.8$7.3 million and $2.7$6.7 million as of June 30, 20172019 and 2016,2018, respectively. These amounts will be paid upon vesting of the underlying unvested restricted stock unitsRSUs as described in Note 8,9, “Equity, and Long-term Incentive Compensation Plans.”Plans and Non-Controlling Interest” to our Consolidated Financial Statements.
On JuneAugust 1, 2017,2019, we announced that our Board of Directors had authorized an increase in the level of ourdeclared a quarterly cash dividend from $0.54 to $0.59of $0.75 per share. Refer to Note 19, “Subsequent Events” to the consolidated financial statementsConsolidated Financial Statements for additional information regarding the declaration of our quarterly cash dividend announced subsequent to June 30, 2017.2019.
On November 19, 2014, weour Board of Directors declared a special cash dividend of $16.50 per share on our outstanding common stock which was paid on December 9, 2014 to our stockholders of record as of the close of business on December 1, 2014. Additionally, in connection with the special cash dividend, our Board of Directors and our Compensation Committee of our Board of Directors approved a proportionate and equitable adjustment to outstanding equity awards (restricted stock units and stock options) under the 2004 Equity Incentive Plan (the “2004 Plan”), as required by the 2004 Plan, subject to the vesting requirements of the underlying awards. As the adjustment was required by the 2004 Plan, the adjustment to the outstanding awards did not result in any incremental compensation expense due to modification of such awards, under the authoritative guidance.stock. The declaration and payment of the special cash dividend was part of our leveraged recapitalization transaction under which the special cash dividend was financed through a combination of existing cash and proceeds from the debt financing disclosed in Note 7,8, “Debt” that was completed during the three months ended December 31, 2014. As of the declaration date, theThe total amount of the special cash dividend accrued by us at the declaration date was approximately $2.76 billion, substantially all of which was paid out during the three months ended December 31, 2014, except for the aggregate special cash dividend of $43.0 million that was accrued for the unvested restricted stock units. As of June 30, 2017RSUs and 2016, we had $9.0 million and $16.9 million, respectively, of accrued dividends payable for the special cash dividend with respect to outstanding unvested restricted stock units, which will be paid when such underlying unvested restricted stock unitsRSUs vest. During the second quarter of fiscal 2019, all of the special cash dividends accrued with respect to outstanding RSUs were vested and paid in full. We paid a special cash dividend with respect to vested restricted stock units during the fiscal years ended June 30, 2019, 2018 and 2017 2016 and 2015 of $8.6$2.9 million, $21.8$6.4 million and $1.8$8.6 million, respectively. Other than the special cash dividend declared during the three months ended December 31, 2014, we historically have not declared any special cash dividend. For details of the special cash dividend, refer to Note 9 “Equity, Long-Term Incentive Compensation Plans and Non-Controlling Interest,” to our Consolidated Financial Statements
Stock Repurchases:
The shares repurchased under our stock repurchase program have reduced our basic and diluted weighted-average shares outstanding for the fiscal years ended June 30, 20172019 and 2016.2018. The stock repurchase program is intended, in part, to offset shares issued in connection with the purchases under our ESPPEmployee Stock Purchase Plan (“ESPP”) program and the vesting of employee restricted stock units.

Fiscal Year 20172019 Compared to Fiscal Year 20162018
Cash Flows from Operating Activities:
We have historically financed our liquidity requirements through cash generated from operations. Net cash provided by operating activities during the fiscal year ended June 30, 2017 increased2019 decreased by $76.5 million compared to the fiscal year ended June 30, 2016,2018, from $759.7 million$1.23 billion to $1.08$1.15 billion primarily as a result of the following key factors:
An increase in accounts payable payments of approximately $58.0 million;
An increase in payments for employee-related expenses of approximately $51.0 million;
An increase in payments for merger and acquisition related expenses, net of cash outflow mostly related to the Orbotech acquisition of approximately $51.0 million;
These trends were partially offset by a decrease in income tax payments of $72.7 million, and an increase in collections of approximately $567.0 million during the fiscal year ended June 30, 2017 compared to the fiscal year June 30, 2016, mainly driven by higher shipments;$10.0 million.
The positive impact of our early adoption of the new accounting standard update for share-based payment awards to employees on a prospective basis during the fiscal year ended June 30, 2017, which no longer requires the excess tax benefit from share-based compensation to be shown as a reduction within cash flows from operating activities of $11.9 million compared to the fiscal ended June 30, 2016;
An increase in interest income of approximately $9.0 million during the fiscal year ended June 30, 2017 compared to the fiscal year ended June 30, 2016, as U.S. dollar interest rates increased; partially offset by
An increase in accounts payable payments of approximately $71.0 million during the fiscal year ended June 30, 2017 compared to the fiscal year ended June 30, 2016;
An increase in income tax payments of $129.0 million during the fiscal year ended June 30, 2017 compared to the fiscal year ended June 30, 2016, reflecting higher operating profits;
An increase in payroll and employee expenses of approximately $85.0 million during the fiscal year ended June 30, 2017 compared to the fiscal year ended June 30, 2016, primarily due to a change in the timing of certain variable compensation payments; and
Less unfavorable impacts from currency fluctuations of approximately $19.0 million during the fiscal year ended June 30, 2017 compared to the fiscal year ended June 30, 2016.
Cash Flows from Investing Activities:
Net cash used byin investing activities during the fiscal year ended June 30, 20172019 was $560.9 million$1.18 billion compared to net cash provided by investing activities of $144.7$291.6 million during the fiscal year ended June 30, 2016. The change primarily resulted from2018. This increase was mainly due to $1.82 billion paid to fund Orbotech and other acquisitions, an increase in capital expenditures of $63.6 million, partially offset by higher net purchasessales and maturities of marketable securities of $493.2 million and cash used for a business acquisition of $28.6 million during the fiscal year ended June 30, 2017.$388.8 million.

Cash Flows from Financing Activities:
Net cash used in financing activities during the fiscal year ended June 30, 20172019 decreased compared to the fiscal year ended June 30, 2016,2018, from $636.7 million$1.27 billion to $472.8 million, primarily as a result$360.0 million. This change was mainly impacted by net proceeds from the issuance of a decreaseSenior Notes in March 2019 of $1.18 billion, partially offset by an increase in common stock repurchases of $156.7$892.0 million and the impact of our early adoption of the new accounting standard update for share-based payment awards to employees on a prospective basis during the year ended June 30, 2017. This new standard no longer requires the excess tax benefit from share-based compensation to be shown as a cash inflow from financing activities, resulting in a change of $11.9 million from the year ended June 30, 2016.
Fiscal Year 2016 Compared to Fiscal Year 2015
Cash Flows from Operating Activities:
Net cash provided by operating activities during the fiscal year ended June 30, 2016 increased compared to the fiscal year ended June 30, 2015, from $605.9 million to $759.7 million primarily as a result of the following key factors:
Anan increase in collectionsdividend and dividend equivalent payments of approximately $294.0$70.2 million mostly due to higher shipments during the fiscal year ended June 30, 2016 compared to the fiscal year ended June 30, 2015;
A decrease in payroll and employee-related payments of approximately $34.0 million during the fiscal year ended June 30, 2016 compared to the fiscal year ended June 30, 2015; partially offset by
Anan increase in vendor payments of approximately $65.0 million during the fiscal year ended June 30, 2016 mainly due to higher inventory purchases compared to the fiscal year ended June 30, 2015;
A net increase of realized foreign exchange hedge losses of approximately $48.0 million during the fiscal year ended June 30, 2016 compared to the fiscal year ended June 30, 2015, mainly due to the substantial foreign exchange fluctuations in Japanese Yen during these periods;
An increase in debt interest payments of approximately $27.0 million during the fiscal year ended June 30, 2016 due to higher average outstanding debt balances compared to the fiscal year ended June 30, 2015;

An increase in income tax and other tax payments net of tax refunds of approximately $22.0 million during the fiscal year ended June 30, 2016 compared to the fiscal year ended June 30, 2015; and
An increase in cash LTI payments of approximately $13.0 million during the fiscal year ended June 30, 2016 compared to the fiscal year ended June 30, 2015.
Cash Flows from Investing Activities:
Net cash provided by investing activities during the fiscal year ended June 30, 2016 decreased to $144.7 million compared to the fiscal year ended June 30, 2015 from net cash provided in investing activities of $918.2 million, primarily as a result of our strategic decision to liquidate certain marketable securities in our investment portfolioquarterly dividend from $0.59 to fund our working capital requirements during the fiscal year ended June 30, 2015, partially offset by approximately $14.0 million lower capital expenditures during the fiscal year ended June 30, 2016, as compared to the fiscal year ended June 30, 2015.$0.75 per share.
Cash Flows from Financing Activities:
Net cash used in financing activities during the fiscal year ended June 30, 2016 decreased compared to the fiscal year ended June 30, 2015, from $1.30 billion to $636.7 million, primarily as a result of the following key factors:
A decrease in payment of dividends to stockholders of $2.70 billion, primarily from the payment of special cash dividend during the fiscal year ended June 30, 2015;
A decrease in repayment of debt of approximately $781.0 million mainly as a result of the redemption of the 2018 Senior Notes during the fiscal year ended June 30, 2015;
A decrease in common stock repurchases of $421.0 million during the fiscal year ended June 30, 2016 compared to the fiscal year ended June 30, 2015. In connection with entering into the Merger Agreement, we suspended further repurchases under our repurchase program effective October 21, 2015; partially offset by
Net proceeds of $3.22 billion from the issuance of Senior Notes and the term loans during the fiscal year ended June 30, 2015.
Senior Notes:
In March 2019 and November 2014, we issued $1.20 billion and $2.50 billion, respectively (each a “2019 Senior Notes”, a “2014 Senior Notes”, and collectively the “Senior Notes”), aggregate principal amount of senior, unsecured long-term notes (collectively referred to as “Senior Notes”). We issued the Senior Notes as part of the leveraged recapitalization plan under which the proceeds from the Senior Notes in conjunction with the proceeds from the term loans (described below) and cash on hand were used (x) to fund a special cash dividend of $16.50 per share, aggregating to approximately $2.76 billion, (y) to redeem $750.0 million of 2018 Senior Notes, including associated redemption premiums, accrued interest and other fees and expenses and (z) for other general corporate purposes, including repurchases of shares pursuant to our stock repurchase program. notes.
The interest rate specified for each series of the 2014 Senior Notes will be subject to adjustments from time to time if Moody’s Investor Service, Inc. (“Moody’s”) or Standard & Poor’s Ratings Services (“S&P”) or, under certain circumstances, a substitute rating agency selected by us as a replacement for Moody’s or S&P, as the case may be (a “Substitute Rating Agency”), downgrades (or subsequently upgrades) its rating assigned to the respective series of the 2014 Senior Notes such that the adjusted rating is below investment grade. IfUnlike the adjusted rating of any2014 Senior Notes, the interest rate for each series of Senior Notes from Moody’s (or, if applicable, any Substitute Rating Agency) is decreased to Ba1, Ba2, Ba3 or B1 or below, the stated interest rate on such series of Senior Notes as noted above will increase by 25 bps, 50 bps, 75 bps or 100 bps, respectively (“bps” refers to Basis Points and 1% is equal to 100 bps). If the rating of any series of Senior Notes from S&P (or, if applicable, any Substitute Rating Agency) with respect to such series of Senior Notes is decreased to BB+, BB, BB- or B+ or below, the stated interest rate on such series of Senior Notes as noted above will increase by 25 bps, 50 bps, 75 bps or 100 bps, respectively. The interest rates on any series of2019 Senior Notes will permanently cease tonot be subject to any adjustment (notwithstanding any subsequent decrease insuch adjustments. During the ratings by any of Moody’s, S&P and, if applicable, any Substitute Rating Agency) if suchthree months ended June 30, 2018, we entered into a series of Senior Notes becomes rated “Baa1” (or its equivalent) or higher by Moody’s (or, if applicable, any Substitute Rating Agency) and “BBB+” (or its equivalent) or higher by S&P (or, if applicable, any Substitute Rating Agency), or oneforward contracts (the “2018 Rate Lock Agreements”) to lock the benchmark interest rate with notional amount of those ratings if rated by only one of Moody’s, S&P and, if applicable, any Substitute Rating Agency,$500.0 million in each case with a stable or positive outlook.aggregate. In October 2014, we entered into a series of forward contracts to lock the 10-year treasury rate (“benchmark rate”) on a portion of the 2014 Senior Notes with a notional amount of $1.00 billion in aggregate. For additional details, refer to Note 16,17, “Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities” and Note 8 “Debt” to the consolidated financial statements.our Consolidated Financial Statements.
The original discountdiscounts on the 2019 Senior Notes and the 2014 Senior Notes amounted to $6.7 million and $4.0 million, respectively, and isare being amortized over the life of the debt. Interest is payable semi-annually on May 1 and November 1 of each year.year for the 2014 Senior Notes and semi-annually on March 15 and September 15 of each year for the 2019 Senior Notes. The debt indenture for the Senior Notes (the “Indenture”) includes covenants that limit our ability to grant liens on itsour facilities and enter into sale and leaseback transactions, subject to certain allowances under which certain sale and leaseback transactions are not restricted.
In certain circumstances involving a change of control followed by a downgrade of the rating of a series of Senior Notes by at least two of Moody’s, S&P and Fitch Inc., unless we have exercised our rights to redeem the Senior Notes of such series, we will be required to make an offer to repurchase all or, at the holder’s option, any part, of each holder’s Senior Notes of that series pursuant to the offer described below (the “Change of Control Offer”). In the Change of Control Offer, we will be required to offer payment in cash equal to 101% of the aggregate principal amount of Senior Notes repurchased plus accrued and unpaid interest, if any, on the Senior Notes repurchased, up to, but not including, the date of repurchase.
As of June 30, 2017,2019, we were in compliance with all of theour covenants under the Indenture associated with the Senior Notes.

Credit Facility (Term Loans and Unfunded Revolving Credit Facility):Facility:
In November 2014,2017, we entered into $750.0 million of five-year senior unsecured prepayable term loans and a $500.0 million unfunded revolving credit facility (collectively, the “Credit Facility”) under the Credit Agreement (the “Credit Agreement”). The interest providing for a $750.0 million five-year unsecured Revolving Credit Facility (the “Revolving Credit Facility”), which replaced our prior Credit Facility. Subject to the terms of the Credit Agreement, the Revolving Credit Facility may be increased in an amount up to $250.0 million in the aggregate. In November 2018, we entered into an Incremental Facility, Extension and Amendment Agreement (the “Amendment”), which amends the Credit Agreement to (a) extend the Maturity Date (the “Maturity Date”) from November 30, 2022 to November 30, 2023, (b) increase the total commitment by $250.0 million and (c) effect certain other amendments to the Credit Agreement as set forth in the Amendment. After giving effect to the Amendment, the total commitments under the Credit Agreement are $1.00 billion. During the third quarter of the fiscal year ended June 30, 2019, we made borrowings of $900.0 million from the Revolving Credit Facility as part of the funding for the Orbotech Acquisition, which were paid in full in the same quarter. As of June 30, 2019, we had no outstanding borrowings under the Revolving Credit Facility.
We may borrow, repay and reborrow funds under the Revolving Credit Facility until the Maturity Date, at which time such Revolving Credit Facility will terminate, and all outstanding loans under such facility, together with all accrued and unpaid interest, must be payable onrepaid. We may prepay outstanding borrowings under the borrowed amountsRevolving Credit Facility at any time without a prepayment penalty.

Borrowings under the Revolving Credit Facility will bear interest, at our option, at either: (i) the Alternative Base Rate (“ABR”) plus a spread, which ranges from 0 bps to 75 bps, or (ii) the London Interbank Offered Rate (“LIBOR”) plus a spread, which is currently 125ranges from 100 bps to 175 bps. The spreads under ABR and this spread isLIBOR are subject to adjustment in conjunction with our credit rating downgrades or upgrades. The spread ranges from 100 bps to 175 bps based on the then effective credit rating. We are also obligated to pay an annual commitment fee on the daily undrawn balance of 15the Revolving Credit Facility, which ranges from 10 bps to 25 bps, subject to an adjustment in conjunction with changes to our credit rating. As of June 30, 2019, we pay an annual commitment fee of 12.5 bps on the daily undrawn balance of the revolving credit facility, which is also subject to an adjustment in conjunction with our credit rating downgrades or upgrades by Moody’s and S&P. The annual commitment fee ranges from 10 bps to 25 bps on the daily undrawn balance of the revolving credit facility, depending upon the then effective credit rating. Principal payments with respect to the term loans will be made on the last day of each calendar quarter and any unpaid principal balance of the term loans, including accrued interest, shall be payable on November 14, 2019 (the “Maturity Date”). We may prepay the term loans and unfunded revolving credit facility at any time without a prepayment penalty. During the fiscal year ended June 30, 2017, we made term loan principal payments of $130.0 million. The remaining term loan balance of $446.3 million as of June 30, 2017 is due in the fiscal quarter ending December 31, 2019.Revolving Credit Facility.
The Revolving Credit Facility requires us to maintain an interest expense coverage ratio as described in the Credit Agreement, on a quarterly basis, covering the trailing four consecutive fiscal quarters of no less than 3.50 to 1.00. In addition, we are required to maintain the maximum leverage ratio as described in the Credit Agreement, on a quarterly basis of 3.00 to 1.00, covering the trailing four consecutive fiscal quarters for each fiscal quarter.quarter, which can be increased to 4.00 to 1.00 for a period of time in connection with a material acquisition or a series of material acquisitions. As of June 30, 2019, we elected to increase the maximum allowed leverage ratio to 4.00 to 1.00 following the Orbotech Acquisition.
We were in compliance with the financialall covenants under the Credit Agreement as of June 30, 20172019 (the interest expense coverage ratio was 11.5814.27 to 1.00 and the leverage ratio was 2.081.80 to 1.00) and had no outstanding borrowings under the unfunded revolving credit facility.. Considering our current liquidity position, short-term financial forecasts and ability to prepay the term loans,Revolving Credit Facility, if necessary, we expect to continue to be in compliance with our financial covenants at the end of our first quarter of fiscal year ending June 30, 2018.2020.
Debt Redemption:
In December 2014, we redeemed the $750.0 million aggregate principal amount of 2018 Senior Notes. The redemption resulted in a pre-tax net loss on extinguishment of debt of $131.7 million for the three months ended December 31, 2014, after an offset of a $1.2 million of gain upon the termination of the non-designated forward contract described below.
In addition, in November 2014, we entered into a non-designated forward contract to lock the treasury rate to be used for determining the redemption amount as part of our plan to redeem the existing 2018 Senior Notes. The notional amount of the non-designated forward contract was $750.0 million. For additional details, refer to Note 16, “Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities” to the consolidated financial statements.

Contractual Obligations
The following is a schedule summarizing our significant obligations to make future payments under contractual obligations as of June 30, 20172019: 
Fiscal year ending June 30,Fiscal year ending June 30,
(In thousands)Total 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 and thereafter OthersTotal 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 and thereafter Others
Debt obligations(1)
$2,946,250
 $250,000
 $
 $696,250
 $
 $500,000
 $1,500,000
 $
$3,450,000
 $250,000
 $
 $500,000
 $
 $
 $2,700,000
 $
Interest payment associated with all
debt obligations
(2)
829,212
 116,579
 113,610
 101,710
 92,875
 82,563
 321,875
 
1,653,037
 152,925
 146,942
 136,630
 126,317
 125,581
 964,642
 
Purchase commitments(3)
432,752
 428,903
 3,586
 142
 121
 
 
 
631,128
 621,401
 7,405
 1,405
 423
 226
 268
 
Income taxes
payable
(4)
74,344
 
 
 
 
 
 
 74,344
139,603
 
 
 
 
 
 
 139,603
Operating leases25,515
 9,073
 5,768
 4,341
 2,486
 1,358
 2,489
 
103,571
 30,296
 22,250
 16,217
 11,878
 7,912
 15,018
 
Cash long-term incentive program(5)
163,141
 58,088
 46,809
 34,534
 23,710
 
 
 
179,346
 67,831
 58,307
 34,884
 18,324
 
 
 
Pension obligations(6)
23,938
 1,551
 1,586
 1,534
 1,705
 2,574
 14,988
 
38,415
 2,327
 2,144
 2,806
 2,950
 5,257
 22,931
 
Executive Deferred
Savings Plan
(7)
183,603
 
 
 
 
 
 
 183,603
208,926
 
 
 
 
 
 
 208,926
Other(8)
34,600
 28,640
 4,822
 1,044
 94
 
 
 
Total contractual cash obligations$4,713,355
 $892,834
 $176,181
 $839,555
 $120,991
 $586,495
 $1,839,352
 $257,947
Transition tax payable(8)
283,143
 8,643
 26,143
 26,143
 26,143
 49,018
 147,053
 
Liability for employee rights upon retirement(9)
52,108
 
 
 
 
 
 
 52,108
Other(10)
7,340
 3,991
 1,696
 1,159
 418
 76
 
 
Total obligations$6,746,617
 $1,137,414
 $264,887
 $719,244
 $186,453
 $188,070
 $3,849,912
 $400,637
__________________ 
(1)In November 2014, we issued $750.0 million aggregate principal amount of term loans due in fiscal year 2020 (outstanding balance of $446.3 million as of June 30, 2017) and $2.50Represents $3.45 billion aggregate principal amount of Senior Notes due from fiscal year 20182020 to fiscal year 2035. During our fiscal year ended June 30, 2017, we made term loan principal payments of $130.0 million.2049.
(2)The interest payments associated with the Senior Notes obligationspayable included in the table above are based on the principal amount multiplied by the applicable couponinterest rate for each series of Senior Notes. Our future interest payments are subject to change if our then effective credit rating is below investment grade as discussed above. The interest payments under the term loans are payable on the borrowed amounts at the LIBOR plus 125 bps. As of June 30, 2017, we utilized the existing interest rates to project our estimated term loans interest payments for the next five years. The interest payment under the revolving credit facilityRevolving Credit Facility for the undrawn balance is payable at 1512.5 bps as a commitment fee based on the daily undrawn balance and we utilized the existing rate for the projected interest payments included in the table above. Our future interest payments for the term loans and the revolving credit facility areRevolving Credit Facility is subject to change due to future fluctuations in the LIBOR rates as well as any upgrades or downgrades to our then effective credit rating.

(3)Represents an estimate of significant commitments to purchase inventory from our suppliers as well as an estimate of significant purchase commitments associated with goods, services and other goods and servicesassets in the ordinary course of business. Our liabilityobligation under these purchase commitments is generally restricted to a forecasted time-horizon as mutually agreed upon between the parties. This forecasted time-horizon can vary among different suppliers. Actual expenditures will vary based upon the volume of the transactions and length of contractual service provided. In addition, the amounts paid under these arrangements may be less in the event the arrangements are renegotiated or canceled. Certain agreements provide for potential cancellation penalties.
(4)Represents the estimated income tax payable obligation related to uncertain tax positions as well as related accrued interest. We are unable to make a reasonably reliable estimate of the timing of payments in individual years due to uncertainties in the timing of tax audit outcomes.
(5)Represents the amount committed under our cash long-term incentive program. The expected payment after estimated forfeitures is approximately $133.0$145.8 million.
(6)Represents an estimate of expected benefit payments up to fiscal year 20272029 that was actuarially determined and excludes the minimum cash required to contribute to the plan. As of June 30, 2017,2019, our defined benefit pension plans do not have material required minimum cash contribution obligations.

(7)Represents the amount committed under our non-qualified executive deferred compensation plan. We are unable to make a reasonably reliable estimate of the timing of payments in individual years due to the uncertainties in the timing around participant’s separation and any potential changes that participants may decide to make to the previous distribution elections.
(8)Includes $20.8 millionRepresents the transition tax liability associated with our deemed repatriation of employee-related retention commitmentsaccumulated foreign earnings as a result from the enactment of the Tax Cuts and Jobs-Act into law on December 22, 2017.
(9)Represents severance payments due upon dismissal of an employee or upon termination of employment in connection with the retention program adopted at the time we entered into the Merger Agreement with Lam Researchcertain other circumstances as well as the amountrequired under Israeli law.
(10)Represents amounts committed for accrued dividends payable of $13.8 million, substantially all of which are for the special cash dividend for the unvested restricted stock units as of the dividend record date as well as quarterly cash dividends fromfor unvested restricted stock units granted with dividend equivalent rights. For additional details, refer to Note 8,9, “Equity, and Long-term Incentive Compensation Plans.Plans and Non-Controlling Interest, to our Consolidated Financial Statements.
We have adopted a cash-based long-term incentive (“Cash LTI”) program for many of our employees as part of our employee compensation program. Cash LTI awards issued to employees under the Cash Long-Term Incentive Plan (“Cash LTI Plan”) generally vest in three or four equal installments, with one-third or one-fourth of the aggregate amount of the Cash LTI award vesting on each yearly anniversary of the grant date over a three or four-year period. In orderinstallments. For additional details, refer to receive payments under the Cash LTI Plan, participants must remain employed by us as of the applicable award vesting date.Note 9, “Equity, Long-term Incentive Compensation Plans and Non-Controlling Interest,” to our Consolidated Financial Statements.
We have agreements with financial institutions to sell certain of our trade receivables and promissory notes from customers without recourse. In addition, we periodically sell certain letters of credit (“LCs”), without recourse, received from customers in payment for goods and services.
The following table shows total receivables sold under factoring agreements and proceeds from sales of LCs for the indicated periods:
Year ended June 30,Year ended June 30,
(In thousands)2017 2016 20152019 2018 2017
Receivables sold under factoring agreements$152,509
 $205,790
 $137,285
$193,089
 $217,462
 $152,509
Proceeds from sales of LCs$48,780
 $21,904
 $6,920
$95,436
 $5,511
 $48,780
 Factoring and LC fees for the sale of certain trade receivables were recorded in other expense (income), net and were not material for the periods presented.
We maintain guarantee arrangements available through various financial institutions for up to $25.3$50.8 million, of which $22.1$44.7 million had been issued as of June 30, 2017,2019, primarily to fund guarantees to customs authorities for value-added tax (“VAT”) and other operating requirements of our subsidiaries in Europe, Israel, and Asia.
We maintain certain open inventory purchase commitments with our suppliers to ensure a smooth and continuous supply for key components. Our liability under these purchase commitments is generally restricted to a forecasted time-horizon as mutually agreed upon between the parties. This forecasted time-horizon can vary among different suppliers. Our open inventory purchase commitments were approximately $432.8 million as of June 30, 2017 and are primarily due within the next 12 months. Actual expenditures will vary based upon the volume of the transactions and length of contractual service provided. In addition, the amounts paid under these arrangements may be less in the event that the arrangements are renegotiated or canceled. Certain agreements provide for potential cancellation penalties.
We provide standard warranty coverage on our systems for 40 hours per week for 12 months, providing labor and parts necessary to repair and maintain the systems during the warranty period. We account for the estimated warranty cost as a charge to costs of revenues when revenue is recognized. The estimated warranty cost is based on historical product performance and field expenses. The actual product performance and/or field expense profiles may differ, and in those cases we adjust our warranty accruals accordingly. The difference between the estimated and actual warranty costs tends to be larger for new product introductions as there is limited historical product performance to estimate warranty expense; our warranty charge estimates for more mature products with longer product performance histories tend to be more stable. Non-standard warranty coverage generally includes services incremental to the standard 40-hours per week coverage for 12 months. See Note 13, “Commitments and Contingencies” to the Consolidated Financial Statements for additional details.

Working Capital:
Working capital was $3.10$2.55 billion as of June 30, 2017,2019, which was an increaserepresents a decrease of $233.3$788.1 million compared to our working capital as of June 30, 2016.2018. As of June 30, 2017,2019, our principal sources of liquidity consisted of $3.02$1.74 billion of cash, cash equivalents and marketable securities. Our liquidity ismay be affected by many factors, some of which are based on the normal ongoing operations of the business, spending for business acquisitions, and others of which relate toother factors such as uncertainty in the uncertainties of global and regional economies and the semiconductor, semiconductor-related and the semiconductor equipmentelectronic device industries. Although cash requirements will fluctuate based on the timing and extent of these factors, we believe that cash generated from operations, together with the liquidity provided by existing cash and cash equivalents balances and our $500.0 million unfunded revolving credit facility,$1.00 billion Revolving Credit Facility, will be sufficient to satisfy our liquidity requirements associated with working capital needs, capital expenditures, cash dividends, stock repurchases and other contractual obligations, including repayment of outstanding debt, for at least the next 12 months.
Our credit ratings as of June 30, 20172019 are summarized below: 
Rating AgencyRating
FitchBBB-BBB+
Moody’sBaa2Baa1
Standard & Poor’sBBB
Factors that can affect our credit ratings include changes in our operating performance, the economic environment, conditions in the semiconductor and semiconductor equipment industries, our financial position, material acquisitions and changes in our business strategy.
Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements
Under our foreign currency risk management strategy,As of June 30, 2019, we utilize derivative instrumentsdid not have any off-balance sheet arrangements, as defined in Item 303(a)(4)(ii) of SEC Regulation S-K, that have or are reasonably likely to protect our earnings and cash flows from unanticipated fluctuations in earnings and cash flows caused by volatility in currency exchange rates. This financial exposure is monitored and managed as an integral part of our overall risk management program, which focuses on the unpredictability of financial markets and seeks to reduce the potentially adverse effects that the volatility of these markets may have a current or future effect on our operating results. We continuefinancial position, changes in financial condition, revenues and expenses, results of operations, liquidity, capital expenditures, or capital resources that are material to investors. Refer to Note 14 “Commitments and Contingencies” to our policy of hedging our current and forecasted foreign currency exposures with hedging instruments having tenors of up to 18 months (see Note 16, “Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities” to the Consolidated Financial Statements for additional details). Our outstanding hedge contracts, with maximum remaining maturities of approximately ten months and seven months as of June 30, 2017 and 2016, respectively, were as follows:
 As of June 30,
(In thousands)2017 2016
Cash flow hedge contracts   
Purchase$19,305
 $7,591
Sell$128,672
 $91,793
Other foreign currency hedge contracts   
Purchase$165,563
 $122,275
Sell$118,504
 $115,087
information related to indemnification obligations.

In October 2014, in anticipation of the issuance of the Senior Notes, we entered into a series of forward contracts (“Rate Lock Agreements”) to lock the benchmark rate on a portion of the Senior Notes. The objective of the Rate Lock Agreements was to hedge the risk associated with the variability in interest rates due to the changes in the benchmark rate leading up to the closing of the intended financing, on the notional amount being hedged. The Rate Lock Agreements had a notional amount of $1.00 billion in aggregate which matured in the second quarter of the fiscal year ended June 30, 2015. We designated each of the Rate Lock Agreements as a qualifying hedging instrument and accounted for as a cash flow hedge, under which the effective portion of the gain or loss on the close out of the Rate Lock Agreements was initially recognized in accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) as a reduction of total stockholders’ equity and subsequently amortized into earnings as a component of interest expense over the term of the underlying debt. The ineffective portion, if any, was recognized in earnings immediately. The Rate Lock Agreements were terminated on the date of pricing of the $1.25 billion of 4.650% Senior Notes due in 2024 and we recorded the fair value of $7.5 million as a gain within accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) as of December 31, 2014. For the fiscal years ended June 30, 2017, 2016 and 2015, we recognized $0.8 million, $0.8 million and $0.5 million, respectively, for the amortization of the gain recognized in accumulated other comprehensive income (loss), which amount reduced the interest expense. As of June 30, 2017, the unamortized portion of the fair value of the forward contracts for the rate lock agreements was $5.5 million. The cash proceeds of $7.5 million from the settlement of the Rate Lock Agreements were included in the cash flows from operating activities in the consolidated statements of cash flows for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2015 because the designated hedged item was classified as interest expense in the cash flows from operating activities in the consolidated statements of cash flows.
In addition, in November 2014, we entered into a non-designated forward contract to lock the treasury rate used to determine the redemption amount of the 2018 Senior Notes that occurred during the three months ended December 31, 2014. The objective of the forward contract was to hedge the risk associated with the variability of the redemption amount due to changes in interest rates through the redemption of the existing 2018 Senior Notes. The forward contract had a notional amount of $750.0 million. The forward contract was terminated in December 2014 and the resulting fair value of $1.2 million was included in the loss on extinguishment of debt and other, net line in the consolidated statements of operations, partially offsetting the loss on redemption of the debt during the three months ended December 31, 2014. The cash proceeds from the forward contract were included in the cash flows from financing activities in the consolidated statements of cash flows for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2015, partially offsetting the cash outflows for the redemption of the 2018 Senior Notes.
Indemnification Obligations. Subject to certain limitations, we are obligated to indemnify our current and former directors, officers and employees with respect to certain litigation matters and investigations that arise in connection with their service to us. These obligations arise under the terms of our certificate of incorporation, our bylaws, applicable contracts, and Delaware and California law. The obligation to indemnify generally means that we are required to pay or reimburse the individuals’ reasonable legal expenses and possibly damages and other liabilities incurred in connection with these matters. For example, we have paid or reimbursed legal expenses incurred in connection with the investigation of our historical stock option practices and the related litigation and government inquiries by a number of our current and former directors, officers and employees. Although the maximum potential amount of future payments we could be required to make under the indemnification obligations generally described in this paragraph is theoretically unlimited, we believe the fair value of this liability, to the extent estimable, is appropriately considered within the reserve we have established for currently pending legal proceedings.
We are a party to a variety of agreements pursuant to which we may be obligated to indemnify the other party with respect to certain matters. Typically, these obligations arise in connection with contracts and license agreements or the sale of assets, under which we customarily agree to hold the other party harmless against losses arising from, or provide customers with other remedies to protect against, bodily injury or damage to personal property caused by our products, non-compliance with our product performance specifications, infringement by our products of third-party intellectual property rights and a breach of warranties, representations and covenants related to matters such as title to assets sold, validity of certain intellectual property rights, non-infringement of third-party rights, and certain income tax-related matters. In each of these circumstances, payment by us is typically subject to the other party making a claim to and cooperating with us pursuant to the procedures specified in the particular contract. This usually allows us to challenge the other party’s claims or, in case of breach of intellectual property representations or covenants, to control the defense or settlement of any third-party claims brought against the other party. Further, our obligations under these agreements may be limited in terms of amounts, activity (typically at our option to replace or correct the products or terminate the agreement with a refund to the other party), and duration. In some instances, we may have recourse against third parties and/or insurance covering certain payments made by us.

In addition, we may in limited circumstances enter into agreements that contain customer-specific commitments on pricing, tool reliability, spare parts stocking levels, service response time and other commitments. Furthermore, we may give these customers limited audit or inspection rights to enable them to confirm that we are complying with these commitments. If a customer elects to exercise its audit or inspection rights, we may be required to expend significant resources to support the audit or inspection, as well as to defend or settle any dispute with a customer that could potentially arise out of such audit or inspection. To date, we have made no significant accruals in our consolidated financial statements for this contingency. While we have not in the past incurred significant expenses for resolving disputes regarding these types of commitments, we cannot make any assurance that we will not incur any such liabilities in the future.
It is not possible to predict the maximum potential amount of future payments under these or similar agreements due to the conditional nature of our obligations and the unique facts and circumstances involved in each particular agreement. Historically, payments made by us under these agreements have not had a material effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations or cash flows.

ITEM 7A.QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK
We are exposed to financial market risks, including changes in interest rates, foreign currency exchange rates and marketable equity security prices. To mitigate these risks, we utilize derivative financial instruments, such as foreign currency hedges. All of the potential changes noted below are based on sensitivity analysesanalysis performed on our financial position as of June 30, 20172019. Actual results may differ materially.
As of June 30, 20172019, we had an investment portfolio of fixed income securities of $2.10 billion.$813.5 million These securities, as with all fixed income instruments, are subject to interest rate risk and will decline in value if market interest rates increase. If market interest rates were to increase immediately and uniformly by 100 bps from levels as of June 30, 2017,2019, the fair value of the portfolio would have declined by $21.9$4.3 million.
In March 2019 and November 2014, we issued $1.20 billion and $2.50 billion, respectively, (each, a “2019 Senior Notes”, a “2014 Senior Notes”, and collectively the “Senior Notes”) aggregate principal amount of fixed rate senior, unsecured long-term notes (collectively referred to as “Senior Notes”) due in various fiscal years ranging from 2018 to 2035.notes. The fair market value of long-term fixed interest rate notes is subject to interest rate risk. Generally, the fair market value of fixed interest rate notes will increase as interest rates fall and decrease as interest rates rise. As of June 30, 2017,2019, the fair value and the book value of our Senior Notes were $2.67$3.70 billion and $2.50$3.45 billion, respectively.respectively, due in various fiscal years ranging from 2020 to 2049. Additionally, the interest expense for the 2014 Senior Notes is subject to interest rate adjustments following a downgrade of our credit ratings below investment grade by the credit rating agencies. Following a rating change below investment grade, the stated interest rate for each series of the 2014 Senior Notes may increase between 25 bps to 100 bps based on the adjusted credit rating. Refer to Note 7,8, “Debt” to theour Consolidated Financial Statements in Part II, Item 8 and Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations, “Liquidity and Capital Resources,” in Part II, Item 7 for additional details. Factors that can affect our credit ratings include changes in our operating performance, the economic environment, conditions in the semiconductor, semiconductor-related, and semiconductor equipmentelectronics industries, our financial position, and changes in our business strategy. As of June 30, 2017,2019, if our credit rating was downgraded below investment grade by Moody’s and S&P, the maximum potential increase to our annual interest expense on the 2014 Senior Notes, considering a 200 bps increase to the stated interest rate for each series of our 2014 Senior Notes, is estimated to be approximately $46.7$41.7 million. Unlike the 2014 Senior Notes, the interest rate for each series of the 2019 Senior Notes will not be subject to such adjustments.

In November 2014,2017, we entered into a Credit Agreement (the “Credit Agreement”) for a $750.0 million aggregate principal amount of floating rate senior,five-year unsecured prepayable term loans due in 2019 and a $500.0 million unfunded revolving credit facility. The interest rates forRevolving Credit Facility (the “Revolving Credit Facility”), which replaced our prior Credit Agreement. Subject to the term loans are based on LIBOR plus a fixed spread and this spread is subject to adjustment in conjunction with our credit rating downgrades or upgrades. The spread ranges from 100 bps to 175 bps based on the adjusted credit rating. The fair valueterms of the term loans is subjectCredit Agreement, the Revolving Credit Facility may be increased in an amount up to interest rate risk only$250.0 million in the aggregate. In November 2018, we entered into an Incremental Facility, Extension and Amendment Agreement (the “Amendment”), which amends the Credit Agreement to (a) extend the Maturity Date (the “Maturity Date”) from November 30, 2022 to November 30, 2023, (b) increase the total commitment by $250.0 million and (c) effect certain other amendments to the extent ofCredit Agreement as set forth in the fixed spread portion ofAmendment. After giving effect to the interest rates which does not fluctuate with change in interest rates.Amendment, the total commitments under the Credit Agreement are $1.00 billion. As of June 30, 2017, the difference between book value and fair value of our term loans was immaterial.2019, we do not have any outstanding floating rate debts that are subject to an increase in interest rates. We are also obligated to pay an annual commitment fee of 1512.5 bps on the daily undrawn balance of the unfunded revolving credit facilityRevolving Credit Facility which is also subject to an adjustment in conjunction with our credit rating downgrades or upgrades. The annual commitment fee ranges from 10 bps to 25 bps on the daily undrawn balance of the revolving credit facility,Revolving Credit Facility, depending upon the then effective credit rating. As of June 30, 2017, if LIBOR-based interest rates increased by 100 bps, the change would increase our annual interest expense annually by approximately $4.0 million as it relates to our borrowings under the term loans. Additionally, as of June 30, 2017,2019, if our credit rating wasratings were downgraded to be below investment grade, the maximum potential increase to our annual interest expensecommitment fee for the term loans and the revolving credit facility,Revolving Credit Facility, using the highest range of the ranges discussed above, is estimated to be approximately $2.7$0.8 million.
See Note 4,5, “Marketable Securities” to theour Consolidated Financial Statements in Part II, Item 8; Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations, “Liquidity and Capital Resources,” in Part II, Item 7; and Risk Factors in Part I, Item 1A of this Annual Report on Form 10-K for a description of recent market events that may affect the value of the investments in our portfolio that we held as of June 30, 20172019.
As of June 30, 20172019, we had net forward and option contracts to sell $62.3$97.6 million in foreign currency in order to hedge certain currency exposures (see Note 16, “Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities” to theour Consolidated Financial Statements for additional details). If we had entered into these contracts on June 30, 20172019, the U.S. dollar equivalent would have been $57.7$98.3 million. A 10% adverse move in all currency exchange rates affecting the contracts would decrease the fair value of the contracts by $29.6$48.3 million. However, if this occurred, the fair value of the underlying exposures hedged by the contracts would increase by a similar amount. Accordingly, we believe that, as a result of the hedging of certain of our foreign currency exposure, changes in most relevant foreign currency exchange rates should have no material impact on our incomeresults of operations or cash flows.

ITEM 8.FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA
 
  
  
  
  
  
  

KLA CORPORATION
(formerly known as KLA-TENCOR CORPORATIONCORPORATION)
Consolidated Balance Sheets
 
As of June 30,As of June 30,
(In thousands, except par value)2017 20162019 2018
ASSETS      
Current assets:      
Cash and cash equivalents$1,153,051
 $1,108,488
$1,015,994
 $1,404,382
Marketable securities1,863,689
 1,382,806
723,391
 1,475,936
Accounts receivable, net571,117
 613,233
990,113
 651,678
Inventories732,988
 698,635
1,262,500
 931,845
Other current assets71,221
 64,870
323,077
 85,159
Total current assets4,392,066
 3,868,032
4,315,075
 4,549,000
Land, property and equipment, net283,975
 278,014
448,799
 286,306
Goodwill349,526
 335,177
2,211,858
 354,698
Deferred income taxes291,967
 302,219
206,141
 193,200
Purchased intangibles, net18,963
 4,331
Purchased intangible assets, net1,560,670
 19,333
Other non-current assets195,676
 174,659
265,973
 236,082
Total assets$5,532,173
 $4,962,432
$9,008,516
 $5,638,619
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY   
LIABILITIES, NON-CONTROLLING INTEREST AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY   
Current liabilities:      
Accounts payable$147,380
 $106,517
$202,416
 $169,354
Deferred system revenue282,348
 
Deferred service revenue206,669
 69,255
Deferred system profit180,861
 174,551

 279,581
Unearned revenue65,507
 59,147
Current portion of long-term debt249,983
 
249,999
 
Other current liabilities649,431
 662,208
827,054
 696,080
Total current liabilities1,293,162
 1,002,423
1,768,486
 1,214,270
Non-current liabilities:      
Long-term debt2,680,474
 3,057,936
3,173,383
 2,237,402
Unearned revenue59,713
 56,336
Deferred tax liabilities702,285
 1,197
Deferred service revenue98,772
 71,997
Other non-current liabilities172,407
 156,623
587,897
 493,242
Total liabilities4,205,756
 4,273,318
6,330,823
 4,018,108
Commitments and contingencies (Notes 13 and 14)
 
Commitments and contingencies (Notes 14 and 15)
 
Stockholders’ equity:      
Preferred stock, $0.001 par value, 1,000 shares authorized, none outstanding
 

 
Common stock, $0.001 par value, 500,000 shares authorized, 261,654 and 260,619 shares issued, 156,840 and 155,955 shares outstanding, as of June 30, 2017 and June 30, 2016, respectively157
 156
Common stock, $0.001 par value, 500,000 shares authorized, 276,202 and 262,718 shares issued, 159,475 and 156,048 shares outstanding, as of June 30, 2019 and June 30, 2018, respectively159
 156
Capital in excess of par value529,126
 452,818
2,017,153
 617,843
Retained earnings848,457
 284,825
714,825
 1,056,445
Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss)(51,323) (48,685)(73,029) (53,933)
Total KLA stockholders’ equity2,659,108
 1,620,511
Non-controlling interest in consolidated subsidiaries18,585
 
Total stockholders’ equity1,326,417
 689,114
2,677,693
 1,620,511
Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity$5,532,173
 $4,962,432
$9,008,516
 $5,638,619
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.Consolidated Financial Statements.

KLA CORPORATION
(formerly known as KLA-TENCOR CORPORATIONCORPORATION)
Consolidated Statements of Operations
 
Year ended June 30,Year ended June 30,
(In thousands, except per share amounts)2017 2016 20152019 2018 2017
Revenues:          
Product$2,703,934
 $2,250,260
 $2,125,396
$3,392,243
 $3,160,671
 $2,703,934
Service776,080
 734,233
 688,653
1,176,661
 876,030
 776,080
Total revenues3,480,014
 2,984,493
 2,814,049
4,568,904
 4,036,701
 3,480,014
Costs and expenses:          
Costs of revenues1,287,547
 1,163,391
 1,215,229
1,869,377
 1,446,041
 1,286,215
Research and development526,870
 481,258
 530,616
711,030
 608,531
 526,688
Selling, general and administrative389,336
 379,399
 406,864
599,124
 442,304
 388,211
Loss on extinguishment of debt and other, net
 
 131,669
Interest expense122,476
 122,887
 106,009
124,604
 114,376
 122,476
Other expense (income), net(19,461) (20,634) (10,469)(31,462) (30,482) (16,822)
Income before income taxes1,173,246
 858,192
 434,131
1,296,231
 1,455,931
 1,173,246
Provision for income taxes247,170
 153,770
 67,973
121,214
 653,666
 247,170
Net income$926,076
 $704,422
 $366,158
1,175,017
 802,265
 926,076
Net income per share:     
Less: Net loss attributable to non-controlling interest(600) 
 
Net income attributable to KLA$1,175,617
 $802,265
 $926,076
Net income per share attributable to KLA     
Basic$5.92
 $4.52
 $2.26
$7.53
 $5.13
 $5.92
Diluted$5.88
 $4.49
 $2.24
$7.49
 $5.10
 $5.88
Cash dividends declared per share (including a special
cash dividend of $16.50 per share declared during the three
months ended December 31, 2014)
$2.14
 $2.08
 $18.50
Weighted-average number of shares:          
Basic156,468
 155,869
 162,282
156,053
 156,346
 156,468
Diluted157,481
 156,779
 163,701
156,949
 157,378
 157,481

See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.Consolidated Financial Statements.

KLA CORPORATION
(formerly known as KLA-TENCOR CORPORATIONCORPORATION)
Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income

Year ended June 30,Year ended June 30,
(In thousands)2017 2016 20152019 2018 2017
Net income$926,076
 $704,422
 $366,158
$1,175,017
 $802,265
 $926,076
Other comprehensive income (loss):          
Currency translation adjustments:          
Change in currency translation adjustments2,332
 (3,898) (20,740)(5,190) 1,358
 2,332
Change in income tax benefit or expense(562) 1,399
 8,086
117
 (678) (562)
Net change related to currency translation adjustments1,770
 (2,499) (12,654)(5,073) 680
 1,770
Cash flow hedges:          
Change in net unrealized gains or losses10,138
 (9,622) 13,745
(9,119) (1,934) 10,138
Reclassification adjustments for net gains or losses included in net income(3,222) 3,722
 (6,615)(4,018) (3,846) (3,222)
Change in income tax benefit or expense(2,470) 2,122
 (2,565)2,033
 2,491
 (2,470)
Net change related to cash flow hedges4,446
 (3,778) 4,565
(11,104) (3,289) 4,446
Net change related to unrecognized losses and transition obligations in connection with defined benefit plans(1,534) (4,552) (147)(1,824) 7,162
 (1,534)
Available-for-sale securities:          
Change in net unrealized gains or losses(8,568) 3,549
 (1,069)11,664
 (9,697) (8,568)
Reclassification adjustments for net gains or losses included in net income(191) (312) (2,119)1,294
 209
 (191)
Change in income tax benefit or expense1,439
 (520) 1,122
(3,208) 2,325
 1,439
Net change related to available-for-sale securities(7,320) 2,717
 (2,066)9,750
 (7,163) (7,320)
Other comprehensive income (loss)(2,638) (8,112) (10,302)
Total comprehensive income$923,438
 $696,310
 $355,856
Other comprehensive loss(8,251) (2,610) (2,638)
Comprehensive loss attributable to non-controlling interest(600) 
 
Total comprehensive income attributable to KLA$1,167,366
 $799,655
 $923,438
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.Consolidated Financial Statements.


KLA CORPORATION
(formerly known as KLA-TENCOR CORPORATIONCORPORATION)
Consolidated Statements of Stockholders’ Equity
Common Stock and
Capital in Excess of
Par Value
 
Retained
Earnings
(Accumulated Deficit)
 
Accumulated
Other
Comprehensive
Income (Loss)
 
Total
Stockholders’
Equity
Common Stock and
Capital in Excess of
Par Value
 
Retained
Earnings
 
Accumulated
Other
Comprehensive
Income (Loss)
 
Total
KLA Stockholders’
Equity
 Non-Controlling Interest 
Total Stockholders’
 Equity
(In thousands, except per share amounts)Shares Amount Shares Amount 
Balances as of June 30, 2014165,448
 $1,220,504
 $2,479,113
 $(30,271) $3,669,346
Net income
 
 366,158
 
 366,158
Other comprehensive loss
 
 
 (10,302) (10,302)
Net issuance under employee stock plans1,658
 16,186
 
 
 16,186
Repurchase of common stock(9,255) (26,891) (581,965) 
 (608,856)
Cash dividends ($18.50 per share including a special cash dividend of $16.50 per share declared during the three months ended December 31, 2014) and dividend equivalents declared
 (807,391) (2,275,668) 
 (3,083,059)
Stock-based compensation expense
 55,302
 
 
 55,302
Tax benefit for equity awards
 16,664
 
 
 16,664
Balances as of June 30, 2015157,851
 474,374
 (12,362) (40,573) 421,439
Net income
 
 704,422
 
 704,422
Other comprehensive loss
 
 
 (8,112) (8,112)
Net issuance under employee stock plans1,589
 14,354
 
 
 14,354
Repurchase of common stock(3,445) (10,049) (165,694) 
 (175,743)
Cash dividends ($2.08 per share) and dividend equivalents declared
 (82,295) (241,541) 
 (323,836)
Stock-based compensation expense
 45,050
 
 
 45,050
Tax benefit for equity awards
 11,540
 
 
 11,540
Balances as of June 30, 2016155,995
 452,974
 284,825
 (48,685) 689,114
155,995
 $452,974
 $284,825
 $(48,685) $689,114
 $
 $689,114
Net income
 
 926,076
 
 926,076

 
 926,076
 
 926,076
 
 926,076
Other comprehensive loss
 
 
 (2,638) (2,638)
 
 
 (2,638) (2,638) 
 (2,638)
Net issuance under employee stock plans1,088
 26,132
 
 
 26,132
1,088
 26,132
 
 
 26,132
 
 26,132
Repurchase of common stock(243) (766) (24,236) 
 (25,002)(243) (766) (24,236) 
 (25,002) 
 (25,002)
Cash dividends ($2.14 per share) and dividend equivalents declared
 
 (338,208) 
 (338,208)
 
 (338,208) 
 (338,208) 
 (338,208)
Stock-based compensation expense
 50,943
 
 
 50,943

 50,943
 
 
 50,943
 
 50,943
Balances as of June 30, 2017156,840
 $529,283
 $848,457
 $(51,323) $1,326,417
156,840
 529,283
 848,457
 (51,323) 1,326,417
 
 1,326,417
Net income
 
 802,265
 
 802,265
 
 802,265
Other comprehensive loss
 
 
 (2,610) (2,610) 
 (2,610)
Net issuance under employee stock plans1,168
 32,687
 
 
 32,687
 
 32,687
Repurchase of common stock(1,960) (6,755) (196,414) 
 (203,169) 
 (203,169)
Cash dividends ($2.52 per share) and dividend equivalents declared
 
 (397,863) 
 (397,863) 
 (397,863)
Stock-based compensation expense
 62,784
 
 
 62,784
 
 62,784
Balances as of June 30, 2018156,048
 617,999
 1,056,445
 (53,933) 1,620,511
 
 1,620,511
Adoption of ASC 606
 
 (21,215) 75
 (21,140) 
 (21,140)
Reclassification of stranded tax effects
 
 10,920
 (10,920) 
 
 
Balance as of July 1, 2018156,048
 617,999
 1,046,150
 (64,778) 1,599,371
 
 1,599,371
Net income attributable to KLA
 
 1,175,617
 
 1,175,617
 
 1,175,617
Net loss attributable to non-controlling interest
 
 
 
 
 (600) (600)
Other comprehensive loss
 
 
 (8,251) (8,251) 
 (8,251)
Assumption of stock-based compensation plan awards in connection with the acquisition of Orbotech
 13,281
 
 
 13,281
 
 13,281
Common stock issued upon the acquisition of Orbotech12,292
 1,330,786
 
 
 1,330,786
 
 1,330,786
Net issuance under employee stock plans1,342
 27,321
 
 
 27,321
 
 27,321
Repurchase of common stock(10,207) (66,269) (1,036,933) 
 (1,103,202) 
 (1,103,202)
Cash dividends ($3.00 per share) and dividend equivalents declared
 
 (470,009) 
 (470,009) 
 (470,009)
Non-controlling interest in connection with the acquisition of Orbotech
 
 
 
 
 19,185
 19,185
Stock-based compensation expense
 94,194
 
 
 94,194
 
 94,194
Balances as of June 30, 2019159,475
 $2,017,312
 $714,825
 $(73,029) $2,659,108
 $18,585
 $2,677,693
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.Consolidated Financial Statements.

KLA CORPORATION
(formerly known as KLA-TENCOR CORPORATIONCORPORATION)
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
Year Ended June 30,Year Ended June 30,
(In thousands)2017 2016 20152019 2018 2017
Cash flows from operating activities:          
Net income$926,076
 $704,422
 $366,158
$1,175,017
 $802,265
 $926,076
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities:          
Depreciation and amortization57,836
 66,932
 80,536
233,224
 62,684
 57,836
Asset impairment charges358
 1,396
 2,126
Loss on extinguishment of debt and other, net
 
 131,669
Non-cash stock-based compensation expense50,943
 45,050
 55,302
Loss (gains) on unrealized foreign exchange and other4,051
 9,886
 (4,173)
Stock-based compensation expense94,194
 62,784
 50,943
Deferred income taxes4,007
 19,804
 (24,245)(27,511) 98,760
 4,007
Excess tax benefit from equity awards
 (11,936) (15,403)
Net gain on sales of marketable securities and other investments(1,207) (5,887) (2,119)
Changes in assets and liabilities, net of business acquisition:     
Decrease (increase) in accounts receivable, net39,898
 (8,292) (118,520)
Decrease (increase) in inventories(46,433) (67,579) 27,500
Decrease (increase) in other assets(26,596) 14,613
 11,135
Increase in accounts payable40,100
 3,109
 848
Increase in deferred system profit6,310
 25,860
 768
Increase (decrease) in other liabilities28,373
 (27,796) 90,151
Changes in assets and liabilities, net of assets acquired and liabilities assumed in business acquisitions:     
Accounts receivable(146,151) (76,033) 39,750
Inventories(59,561) (179,605) (46,549)
Other assets(47,123) (41,748) (25,961)
Accounts payable(21,627) 21,778
 39,968
Deferred system revenue(15,674) 
 
Deferred service revenue15,064
 
 
Deferred system profit
 99,457
 6,310
Other liabilities(51,271) 368,892
 31,458
Net cash provided by operating activities1,079,665
 759,696
 605,906
1,152,632
 1,229,120
 1,079,665
Cash flows from investing activities:          
Acquisition of non-marketable securities(3,430) 
 
(630) (3,377) (3,430)
Business acquisition, net of cash acquired(28,560) 
 
Capital expenditures, net(38,594) (31,741) (45,791)
Business acquisitions, net of cash acquired(1,818,283) (17,403) (28,560)
Capital expenditures(130,498) (66,947) (38,594)
Proceeds from sale of assets2,947
 7,076
 

 
 2,947
Purchases of available-for-sale securities(1,626,983) (1,175,720) (1,731,551)(81,533) (466,330) (1,626,983)
Proceeds from sale of available-for-sale securities434,873
 737,817
 1,993,396
256,395
 233,259
 434,873
Proceeds from maturity of available-for-sale securities699,293
 602,446
 699,108
589,324
 608,446
 699,293
Purchases of trading securities(97,525) (68,378) (60,808)(81,022) (77,922) (97,525)
Proceeds from sale of trading securities97,093
 73,187
 63,867
85,265
 81,892
 97,093
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities(560,886) 144,687
 918,221
Net cash (used in) provided by investing activities(1,180,982) 291,618
 (560,886)
Cash flows from financing activities:          
Proceeds from issuance of debt, net of issuance costs
 
 3,224,906
1,183,785
 
 
Proceeds from revolving credit facility, net of debt issuance costs900,000
 248,693
 
Repayment of debt(130,000) (135,000) (916,117)(902,474) (946,250) (130,000)
Common stock repurchases(1,095,202) (203,169) (25,002)
Payment of dividends to stockholders(472,263) (402,065) (343,993)
Issuance of common stock45,359
 38,298
 47,008
64,828
 61,444
 45,359
Tax withholding payments related to vested and released restricted stock units(19,169) (23,942) (30,229)(37,517) (28,756) (19,169)
Common stock repurchases(25,002) (181,711) (602,888)
Payment of dividends to stockholders(343,993) (346,283) (3,041,055)
Excess tax benefit from equity awards
 11,936
 15,403
Payment of contingent consideration payable(1,162) 
 
Net cash used in financing activities(472,805) (636,702) (1,302,972)(360,005) (1,270,103) (472,805)
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents(1,411) 2,782
 (13,991)(33) 696
 (1,411)
Net increase in cash and cash equivalents44,563
 270,463
 207,164
Net (decrease) increase in cash and cash equivalents(388,388) 251,331
 44,563
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period1,108,488
 838,025
 630,861
1,404,382
 1,153,051
 1,108,488
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period$1,153,051
 $1,108,488
 $838,025
$1,015,994
 $1,404,382
 $1,153,051
Supplemental cash flow disclosures:          
Income taxes paid, net$234,053
 $105,187
 $69,681
$180,470
 $253,128
 $234,053
Interest paid$119,998
 $120,433
 $92,982
$107,073
 $114,238
 $119,998
Non-cash activities:          
Purchase of land, property and equipment - investing activities$3,299
 $2,035
 $1,843
Business acquisition holdback amounts- investing activities

$5,318
 $
 $
Issuance of common stock for the acquisition of Orbotech - financing activities$1,330,786
 $
 $
Contingent consideration payable - financing activities$6,905
 $
 $
Dividends payable - financing activities$7,340
 $9,571
 $13,772
Business acquisition holdback amounts - investing activities$440
 $
 $5,318
Unsettled common stock repurchase - financing activities$
 $
 $5,968
$8,000
 $
 $
Dividends payable - financing activities$13,772
 $19,556
 $42,002
Accrued purchase of land, property and equipment - investing activities$6,353
 $7,418
 $3,299
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.Consolidated Financial Statements.

KLA-TENCORKLA CORPORATION
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
NOTE 1— DESCRIPTION OF BUSINESS AND SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES
Description of Business and Principles of Consolidation. KLA-TencorOn July 15, 2019, we changed our corporate name from “KLA-Tencor Corporation” to “KLA Corporation”. For purposes of this report, “KLA,” the “Company,” “we,” “our,” “us,” or similar references mean KLA Corporation, (“KLA-Tencor” orand its majority-owned subsidiaries unless the “Company”) iscontext requires otherwise. We are a leading supplier of process equipment, process control equipment, and data analytics products for a broad range of industries, including semiconductors, printed circuit boards and displays. We provide advanced process control and yield managementprocess-enabling solutions for themanufacturing and testing wafers and reticles, integrated circuits (“IC” or “chip”), packaging, light emitting diodes, power devices, compound semiconductor devices, microelectromechanical systems, data storage, printed circuit boards and related nanoelectronics industries. KLA-Tencor’s broadflat and flexible panel displays, as well as general materials research. Our comprehensive portfolio of inspection, metrology and metrologydata analytics products, and related service, software and other offerings primarily supportsservices, helps integrated circuit which is referred to as an “IC” or “chip,” manufacturers achieve target yield throughout the entire semiconductor fabrication process, from research and development to final volume production. KLA-Tencor provides leading-edge equipment, softwareWe develop and support thatsell advanced vacuum deposition and etching process tools, which are used by a broad range of specialty semiconductor customers. We enable ICelectronic device manufacturers to identify, resolveinspect, test and manage significantmeasure printed circuit boards (“PCBs”) and flat panel displays (“FPDs) and ICs to verify their quality, pattern the desired electronic circuitry on the relevant substrate and perform three-dimensional shaping of materialized circuits on multiple surfaces. Our advanced technology manufacturing process challengesproducts, coupled with our unique yield management services, allow us to deliver the solutions our semiconductor, printed circuit board and obtain higher finished product yields at lower overall cost. In additiondisplay customers need to serving the semiconductor industry, KLA-Tencor also provides a range of technology solutions to a number of other high technology industries, including the advanced packaging, light emitting diode (LED”), power devices, compound semiconductor,achieve their productivity goals, by significantly reducing their risks and data storage industries, as well as general materials research. costs. Headquartered in Milpitas, California, KLA-Tencor haswe have subsidiaries both in the United States and in key markets throughout the world.
The Consolidated Financial Statements include the accounts of KLA-TencorKLA and its majority-owned subsidiaries. All significant intercompany balances and transactions have been eliminated.
Terminated Merger Agreement.Acquisition of Orbotech, Ltd. On OctoberFebruary 20, 2015,2019 (the “Closing Date” or “Acquisition Date”), we completed the Company entered into an Agreementacquisition of Orbotech, Ltd. (“Orbotech”) for $38.86 in cash and Plan0.25 of Mergera share of our common stock in exchange for each ordinary share of Orbotech for a total consideration of $3.26 billion. The acquisition of Orbotech is referred to as the “Orbotech Acquisition”. The Orbotech Acquisition was accounted for by applying the acquisition method of accounting for business combinations. The Consolidated Financial Statements in this report include the financial results of Orbotech prospectively from the Acquisition Date. For additional details, refer to Note 6 “Business Combinations.”
Subsequent to the Orbotech Acquisition, we changed our organizational structure, resulting in four reportable segments: Semiconductor Process Control; Specialty Semiconductor Process; PCB, Display and Reorganization (the “Merger Agreement” or “Merger”)Component Inspection; and Other. Prior period results have been recast to conform to the current presentation. For additional information, refer to Note 17, “Segment Reporting and Geographic Information.”
Comparability. Effective on the first day of fiscal 2019, we adopted Accounting Standards Update 2014-09, Revenue from Contracts with Lam Research CorporationCustomers (“Lam Research”ASC 606”) which was subject. Prior periods were not retrospectively restated, and accordingly, the Consolidated Balance Sheets as of June 30, 2018, and the Consolidated Statements of Operations for the year ended June 30, 2018 were prepared using accounting standards that were different from those in effect for the year ended June 30, 2019.
Certain reclassifications have been made to regulatory approvals. On October 5, 2016, the parties mutually agreedprior year’s Consolidated Financial Statements to terminateconform to the Merger Agreementcurrent year presentation. The reclassifications did not have material effects on the prior year’s Consolidated Balance Sheets, Statements of Operations, Comprehensive Income and no termination fees were payable by either party.Cash Flows.
Management Estimates. The preparation of the Consolidated Financial Statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America requires management to make estimates and assumptions in applying the Company’sour accounting policies that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities (and related disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities) at the date of the Consolidated Financial Statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting periods. Actual results could differ from those estimates.
Cash Equivalents and Marketable Securities. All highly liquid debt instruments with original or remaining maturities of less than three months at the date of purchase are considered to be cash equivalents. Marketable securities are generally classified as available-for-sale for use in current operations, if required, and are reported at fair value, with unrealized gains and losses, net of tax, presented as a separate component of stockholders’ equity under the caption “Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss).” All realized gains and losses and unrealized losses resulting from declines in fair value that are other than temporary are recorded in earnings in the period of occurrence. The specific identification method is used to determine the realized gains and losses on investments. For all investments in debt and equity securities, the Company assesseswe assess whether the

impairment is other than temporary. If the fair value of a debt security is less than its amortized cost basis, an impairment is considered other than temporary if (i) the Company haswe have the intent to sell the security or it is more likely than not that the Companywe will be required to sell the security before recovery of its entire amortized cost basis, or (ii) the Company doeswe do not expect to recover the entire amortized cost of the security. If an impairment is considered other than temporary based on condition (i), the entire difference between the amortized cost and the fair value of the security is recognized in earnings. If an impairment is considered other than temporary based on condition (ii), the amount representing credit losses, defined as the difference between the present value of the cash flows expected to be collected and the amortized cost basis of the debt security, will be recognized in earnings, and the amount relating to all other factors will be recognized in other comprehensive income (loss). The Company evaluatesWe evaluate both qualitative and quantitative factors such as duration and severity of the unrealized losses, credit ratings, default and loss rates of the underlying collateral, structure and credit enhancements to determine if a credit loss may exist.
Non-Marketable Equity Securities and Other Investments.Securities. KLA-Tencor acquiresWe acquire certain non-marketable equity investments for the promotion of business and strategic objectives, and, to the extent these investments continue to have strategic value, the Company typically does not attempt to reduce or eliminate the inherent market risks.objectives. Non-marketable equity securities do not give us the ability to exercise significant influence over the investees and other investments are recordedaccounted for at historical cost.cost, less impairment, plus or minus observable price changes for identical or similar securities of the same issuer. Non-marketable equity securities and other investments are included in “Other non-current assets” on the balance sheet. Non-marketable equity securities are subject to a periodic impairment review; however, since there are no open-market valuations, and the impairment analysis requires significant judgment. This analysis includes assessment of the investee’s financial condition, the business outlook for its products and technology, its projected results and cash flow, financing transactions subsequent to the acquisition of the investment, the likelihood of obtaining subsequent rounds of financing and the impact of any relevant contractual equity preferences held by us or the Company or others.

Variable Interest Entities. KLA-Tencor usesWe use a qualitative approach in assessing the consolidation requirement for variable interest entities. The approach focuses on identifying which enterprise has the power to direct the activities that most significantly impact the variable interest entity’s economic performance and which enterprise has the obligation to absorb losses or the right to receive benefits from the variable interest entity. In the event that the Company iswe are the primary beneficiary of a variable interest entity, the assets, liabilities, and results of operations of the variable interest entity will be included in the Company’sour Consolidated Financial Statements. The Company hasWe have concluded that none of the Company’sour equity investments require consolidation as per the Company’sbased on our most recent qualitative assessment.
Inventories. Inventories are stated at the lower of cost (on a first-in, first-out basis) or market.net realizable value. Net realizable value is the estimated selling prices in the ordinary course of business, less costs of completion, disposal and transportation. Demonstration units are stated at their manufacturing cost and written down to their net realizable value. The Company reviewsWe review and setsset standard costs semi-annually at current manufacturing costs in order to approximate actual costs. The Company’sOur manufacturing overhead standards for product costs are calculated assuming full absorption of forecasted spending over projected volumes, adjusted for excess capacity. Abnormal inventory costs such as costs of idle facilities, excess freight and handling costs, and spoilage are recognized as current period charges. The Company writesWe write down product inventory based on forecasted demand and technological obsolescence and service spare parts inventory based on forecasted usage. These factors are impacted by market and economic conditions, technology changes, new product introductions and changes in strategic direction and require estimates that may include uncertain elements. Actual demand may differ from forecasted demand, and such differences may have a material effect on recorded inventory values.
Allowance for Doubtful Accounts. A majority of the Company’sour accounts receivable are derived from sales to large multinational semiconductor manufacturers throughout the world. In order to monitor potential credit losses, the Company performswe perform ongoing credit evaluations of its customers’ financial condition. An allowance for doubtful accounts is maintained for probable credit losses based upon the Company’sour assessment of the expected collectibility of the accounts receivable. The allowance for doubtful accounts is reviewed on a quarterly basis to assess the adequacy of the allowance.
Property and Equipment. Property and equipment are recorded at cost, net of accumulated depreciation. Depreciation of property and equipment is based on the straight-line method over the estimated useful lives of the assets. The following table sets forth the estimated useful life for various asset categories:
Asset CategoryRange of Useful Lives
Buildings30 to 3550 years
Leasehold improvementsShorter of 15 years or lease term
Machinery and equipment2 to 510 years
Office furniture and fixtures7 years

Construction-in-process assets are not depreciated until the assets are placed in service. Depreciation expense for the fiscal years ended June 30, 20172019, 20162018 and 20152017 was $49.1$72.6 million, $52.653.3 million and $55.849.1 million, respectively.
Goodwill and Purchased Intangible Assets. KLA-Tencor assessesEffective May 1, 2019, with the change in our reportable segments, we have determined there are now six reporting units, to which goodwill is allocated using an acquisition accounting method. We assess goodwill for impairment annually as well as whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying value may not be recoverable. We perform either a qualitative or quantitative analysis when testing a reporting unit’s goodwill for impairment. A qualitative goodwill impairment test is performed when the fair value of a reporting unit historically has significantly exceeded the carrying value of its net assets and based on current operations is expected to continue to do so. Otherwise, we are required to conduct a quantitative impairment test for each reporting unit and estimates the fair value of each reporting unit using a combination of a discounted cash flow analysis and a market approach based on market multiples. If the fair value of a reporting unit is less than its carrying value, a goodwill impairment charge is recorded for the difference. We performed our annual qualitative assessment of the goodwill by reporting unit during the third quarter of the fiscal year ended June 30, 2019 and concluded that there was no impairment. In addition, as a result of the Orbotech Acquisition, during the fourth quarter of the fiscal year ended June 30, 2019 we updated our organizational structure and performed a qualitative assessment of the goodwill for our reporting units, which were impacted by the organizational change, and concluded that there were no impairment indicators affecting the valuation of goodwill subsequent to our annual impairment test. The next annual evaluation of the goodwill by reporting unit will be performed in the third quarter of the fiscal year ending June 30, 2020.
Long-lived purchased intangible assets are tested for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that their carrying amounts may not be recoverable. See Note 6,7, “Goodwill and Purchased Intangible Assets” for additional details.
Impairment of Long-Lived Assets. KLA-Tencor evaluatesWe evaluate the carrying value of itsour long-lived assets whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying value of the asset may be impaired. An impairment loss is recognized when estimated future cash flows expected to result from the use of the asset, including disposition, are less than the carrying value of the asset. Such an impairment charge would be measured as the excess of the carrying value of the asset over its fair value.
Concentration of Credit Risk. Financial instruments that potentially subject KLA-Tencorus to significant concentrations of credit risk consist primarily of cash equivalents, short-term marketable securities, trade accounts receivable and derivative financial instruments used in hedging activities. The Company investsWe invest in a variety of financial instruments, such as, but not limited to, certificates of deposit, corporate debt and municipal securities, United States Treasury and Government agency securities, and equity securities and, by policy, limits the amount of credit exposure with any one financial institution or commercial issuer. The Company hasWe have not experienced any material credit losses on itsour investments.
A majority of the Company’sour accounts receivable are derived from sales to large multinational semiconductor manufacturers located throughout the world, with a majority located in Asia. In recent years, the Company’sour customer base has become increasingly concentrated due to corporate consolidations, acquisitions and business closures, and to the extent that these customers experience liquidity issues in the future, the Companywe may be required to incur additional bad debt expense

with respect to trade receivables. The Company performsWe perform ongoing credit evaluations of itsour customers’ financial condition and generally requiresrequire no collateral to secure accounts receivable. The Company maintainsWe maintain an allowance for potential credit losses based upon expected collectibility risk of all accounts receivable. In addition, the Companywe may utilize letters of credit, credit insurance or non-recourse factoring to mitigate credit risk when considered appropriate.
The Company isWe are exposed to credit loss in the event of non-performance by counterparties on the foreign exchange contracts that the Company useswe use in hedging activities and in certain factoring transactions. These counterparties are large international financial institutions, and to date no such counterparty has failed to meet its financial obligations to the Companyus under such contracts.
The following customers each accounted for more than 10% of total revenues primarily in Semiconductor Process Control segment for the indicated periods:
Year ended June 30,
2017 2016 2015
Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. Micron Technology, Inc. Intel Corporation
2019 2018 2017
Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company Limited Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company Limited Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.

 
 Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company Limited 
 Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company Limited

The following customers each accounted for more than 10% of net accounts receivable as of the dates indicated below:
As of June 30,
2017 2016
Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. SK Hynix, Inc.
2019 2018
Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company Limited Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company Limited Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.
 Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company Limited
 SK Hynix, Inc.
Foreign Currency. The functional currencies of KLA-Tencor’sour foreign subsidiaries are primarily the local currencies, except as described below. Accordingly, all assets and liabilities of these foreign operations are translated to U.S. dollars at current period end exchange rates, and revenues and expenses are translated to U.S. dollars using average exchange rates in effect during the period. The gains and losses from foreign currency translation of these subsidiaries’ financial statements are recorded directly into a separate component of stockholders’ equity under the caption “Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss).”
The Company’sOur manufacturing subsidiaries in Singapore, Israel, Germany, and GermanyUnited Kingdom use the U.S. dollar as their functional currency. Accordingly, monetary assets and liabilities in non-functional currency of these subsidiaries are remeasured using exchange rates in effect at the end of the period. Revenues and costs in local currency are remeasured using average exchange rates for the period, except for costs related to those balance sheet items that are remeasured using historical exchange rates. The resulting remeasurement gains and losses are included in the Consolidated Statements of Operations as incurred.
Derivative Financial Instruments. KLA-Tencor usesWe use financial instruments, such as forward exchange contracts and currency options, to hedge a portion of, but not all, existing and forecasted foreign currency denominated transactions. The purpose of the Company’sour foreign currency program is to manage the effect of exchange rate fluctuations on certain foreign currency denominated revenues, costs and eventual cash flows. The effect of exchange rate changes on forward exchange contracts is expected to offset the effect of exchange rate changes on the underlying hedged items. The Company believesWe also use interest rate lock agreements to hedge the risk associated with the variability of cash flows due to changes in the benchmark interest rate of the intended debt financing. We believe these financial instruments do not subject the Companyus to speculative risk that would otherwise result from changes in currency exchange rates or interest rates.
All of the Company’sour derivative financial instruments are recorded at fair value based upon quoted market prices for comparable instruments adjusted for risk of counterparty non-performance.
For derivative instruments designated and qualifying as cash flow hedges of forecasted foreign currency denominated transactions or debt financing expected to occur within twelve to eighteen months, the effective portion of the gaingains or loss on these hedgeslosses is reported as a component of “Accumulatedin accumulated other comprehensive income (loss)” in stockholders’ equity, (“OCI”) and is reclassified into earnings whenin the same period or periods during which the hedged transaction affects earnings. IfIn the second quarter of our fiscal year ending June 30, 2019, we early adopted the new accounting guidance for hedge accounting. Prior to adopting this new accounting guidance, time value was excluded from the assessment of effectiveness for derivative instruments designated as cash flow hedges. Time value was amortized on a mark-to-market basis and recognized in earnings over the life of the derivative contract. For derivative contracts executed after adopting the new accounting guidance, the election to include time value for the assessment of effectiveness is made on all forward contracts designated as cash flow hedges. The change in fair value of the derivative are recorded in OCI until the hedged transaction being hedged fails to occur, or if a portion of any derivative is (or becomes) ineffective, the gain or loss on the associated financial instrument is recorded immediatelyrecognized in earnings. The assessment effectiveness of options contracts designated as cash flow hedges continue to exclude time value after adopting the new accounting guidance. The initial value of the component excluded from the assessment of effectiveness are recognized in earnings over the life of the derivative contracts. Any difference between change in the fair value of the excluded components and the amounts recognized in earnings are recorded in OCI. For derivative instruments usedthat are not designated as a cash flow hedge, gains and losses are recognized in other expense (income), net. We use foreign currency forward contracts to hedge existingcertain foreign currency denominated assets or liabilities, theliabilities. The gains orand losses on these hedgesderivative instruments are recorded immediately in earnings tolargely offset by the changes in the fair value of the assets or liabilities being hedged.
Revenue Recognition. We primarily derive revenue from the sale of process control and yield management solutions for the semiconductor and related nanoelectronics industries, maintenance and support of all these products, installation and training services and the sale of spare parts. Our solutions provide a comprehensive portfolio of inspection, metrology and data analytics products, which are accompanied by a flexible portfolio of services to enable our customers to maintain the performance and productivity of the solutions purchased. The acquisition of Orbotech enabled us to broaden our portfolio to include the yield enhancement and production solutions used by manufacturers of printed circuit boards, flat panel displays, advanced packaging, micro-electro-mechanical systems and other electronic components.
Our solutions are generally not sold with a right of return, nor have we experienced significant returns from or refunds to our customers.

Warranty.We account for a contract with a customer when there is approval and commitment from both parties, the rights of the parties are identified, payment terms are identified, the contract has commercial substance and collectibility of consideration is probable.
Our revenues are measured based on consideration stipulated in the arrangement with each customer, net of any sales incentives and amounts collected on behalf of third parties, such as sales taxes. The Company provides standard warranty coveragerevenues are recognized as separate performance obligations that are satisfied by transferring control of the product or service to the customer.
Our arrangements with our customers include various combinations of products and services, which are generally capable of being distinct and accounted for as separate performance obligations. A product or service is considered distinct if it is separately identifiable from other deliverables in the arrangement and if a customer can benefit from it on its systems for 40 hours per week for 12 months, providing labor and parts necessaryown or with other resources that are readily available to repair and maintain the systems during the warranty period. customer.
The Company accounts for the estimated warranty cost as a charge to coststransaction consideration, including any sales incentives, is allocated between separate performance obligations of revenues when revenue is recognized. The estimated warranty cost isan arrangement based on historicalthe stand-alone selling prices (“SSP”) for each distinct product performance and field expenses. Utilizing actual service records, the Company calculates the average service hours and parts expense per system and applies the actual labor and overhead ratesor service. Management considers a variety of factors to determine the estimated warranty charge. The Company updates these estimated charges on a regular basis. The actual productSSP, such as, historical standalone sales of products and services, discounting strategies and other observable data.
From time to time, our contracts are modified to account for additional, or to change existing, performance and/or field expense profiles may differ, and in those cases the Company adjusts its warranty accruals accordingly (see Note 13, “Commitments and Contingencies”).obligations. Our contract modifications are generally accounted for prospectively.
Product Revenue Recognition. The Company recognizes revenue when persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists, delivery has occurred or services have been rendered, the selling price is fixed or determinable, and collectibility is reasonably assured. The Company derives
We recognize revenue from three sources—product sales at a point in time when we have satisfied our performance obligation by transferring control of systems, spare partsthe product to the customer. We use judgment to evaluate whether the control has transferred by considering several indicators, including:
whether we have a present right to payment;
the customer has legal title;
the customer has physical possession;
the customer has significant risk and services. In general, rewards of ownership; and
the Company recognizes revenue for systemscustomer has accepted the product, or whether customer acceptance is considered a formality based on history of acceptance of similar products (for example, when the system has been installed, is operating according to predetermined specifications and is accepted by the customer. When the Company has demonstrated a history of successful installation and acceptance, the Company recognizes revenue upon delivery and customer acceptance. Under certain circumstances, however, the Company recognizes revenue prior to acceptance from the customer, as follows:
When the customer fab has previously accepted the same tool, with the same specifications, and when the Companywe can objectively demonstrate that the tool meets all of the required acceptance criteria.
When system sales to independent distributors have no installation requirement, contain no acceptance agreement,criteria, and 100% of the payment is due based upon shipment.
Whenwhen the installation of the system is deemed perfunctory.perfunctory).
WhenNot all of the customer withholds acceptance dueindicators need to issues unrelatedbe met for us to product performance, in which case revenue is recognized whenconclude that control has transferred to the system is performing as intended and meets predetermined specifications.
customer. In circumstances in which the Company recognizes revenue is recognized prior to installation,the product acceptance, the portion of revenue associated with installationour performance obligations to install product is deferred based on estimated fair value, and that revenue is recognized upon completion of the installation.acceptance.
In many instances, products are sold in stand-alone arrangements. Services are sold separately through renewals of annual maintenance contracts. The Company has multiple element revenue arrangements in cases where certain elements of a sales arrangement are not delivered and accepted in one reporting period. To determine the relative fair value of each element in a revenue arrangement, the Company allocates arrangement consideration based on the selling price hierarchy. For substantially all of the arrangements with multiple deliverables pertaining to products and services, the Company uses vendor-specific objective evidence (“VSOE”) or third-party evidence (“TPE”) to allocate the selling price to each deliverable. The Company determines TPE based on historical prices charged for products and services when sold on a stand-alone basis. When the Company is unable to establish relative selling price using VSOE or TPE, the Company uses estimated selling price (“ESP”) in its allocation of arrangement consideration. The objective of ESP is to determine the price at which the Company would transact a sale if the product or service were sold on a stand-alone basis. ESP could potentially be used for new or customized products. The Company regularly reviews relative selling prices and maintains internal controls over the establishment and updates of these estimates.
In a multiple element revenue arrangement, the Company defers revenue recognition associated with the relative fair value of each undelivered element until that element is delivered to the customer. To be considered a separate element, the product or service in question must represent a separate unit of accounting, which means that such product or service must fulfill the following criteria: (a) the delivered item(s) has value to the customer on a stand-alone basis; and (b) if the arrangement includes a general right of return relative to the delivered item(s), delivery or performance of the undelivered
item(s) is considered probable and substantially in the control of the Company. If the arrangement does not meet all the above criteria, the entire amount of the sales contract is deferred until all elements are accepted by the customer.
Trade-in rights are occasionally granted to customers to trade in tools in connection with subsequent purchases. The Company estimates the value of the trade-in right and reduces the revenue recognized on the initial sale. This amount is recognized at the earlier of the exercise of the trade-in right or the expiration of the trade-in right.
The Company entersWe enter into volume purchase agreements with some of itsour customers. The Company accruesWe adjust the transaction consideration for estimated credits earned by itsour customers for such incentives,incentives. These credits are estimated based upon the forecasted and actual product sales for any given period and agreed-upon incentive rate. The estimate is updated at each reporting period.
We offer perpetual and term licenses for defects and data analysis software. The primary difference between perpetual and term licenses is the duration over which the customer can benefit from the use of the software, while the functionality and the features of the software are the same. With the acquisition of Orbotech we offer computer-aided manufacturing and engineering software solutions for the printed circuit boards production. Software is generally bundled with post-contract customer support (“PCS”), which includes unspecified software updates that are made available throughout the entire term of the arrangement. Revenue from software licenses is recognized at a point in situationstime, when the credit levels vary depending upon sales volume, the Company updates its accrual based on the amount that the Company estimates will be purchased pursuantsoftware is made available to the volume purchase agreements. Accruals for customer credits are recorded as an offset to revenue orcustomer. Revenue from PCS is deferred revenue.
Spare parts revenue is recognized when the product has been shipped, risk of loss has passed to the customerat contract inception and collection of the resulting receivable is probable.

Service and maintenance contract revenue is recognized ratably over the termservice period, or as services are performed.
Services and Spare Parts Revenue
The majority of product sales include a standard 6 to 12-month warranty that is not separately paid for by the customers. The customers may also purchase extended warranty for periods beyond the initial year as part of the initial product sale. We have concluded that the standard 12-month warranty as well as any extended warranty periods included in the initial product sales are separate performance obligations. The estimated fair value of warranty services is deferred and recognized ratably as revenue over the warranty period, as the customer simultaneously receives and consumes the benefits of warranty services provided by us.

Additionally, we offer product maintenance contract.and support services, which the customer may purchase separately from the standard and extended warranty offered as part of the initial product sale. Revenue from separately negotiated maintenance and support service contracts is also recognized over time based on the terms of the applicable service period. Revenue from services performed in the absence of a maintenance contract, including consulting and training revenue, is recognized when the related services are performedperformed. We also sell spare parts, revenue from which is recognized when control over the spare parts is transferred to the customer.
Installation services include connecting and collectibilityvalidating configuration of the product. In addition, several testing protocols are completed to confirm the equipment is performing to customer specifications. Revenues from product installation are deferred and recognized at a point in time, once installation is complete.
Significant Judgments
Our contracts with our customers often include promises to transfer multiple products and services. Each product and service is generally capable of being distinct within the context of the contract and represents a separate performance obligation. Determining the SSP for each distinct performance obligation and allocation of consideration from an arrangement to the individual performance obligations and the appropriate timing of revenue recognition are significant judgments with respect to these arrangements. We typically estimate the SSP of products and services based on observable transactions when the products and services are sold on a standalone basis and those prices fall within a reasonable range. We typically have more than one SSP for individual products and services due to the stratification of these products by customers and circumstances. In these instances, we use information such as the size of the customer, geographic region, as well as customization of the products in determining the SSP. In instances where the SSP is not directly observable, we determine the SSP using information that includes market conditions, entity-specific factors, including discounting strategies, information about the customer or class of customer that is reasonably assured.available and other observable inputs. While changes in the allocation of SSP between performance obligations will not affect the amount of total revenue recognized for a particular contract, any material changes could impact the timing of revenue recognition, which could have a material effect on our financial position and result of operations.
Although the products are generally not sold with a right of return, we may provide other credits or sales incentives, which are accounted for either as variable consideration or material right, depending on the specific terms and conditions of the arrangement. These credits and incentives are estimated at contract inception and updated at the end of each reporting period if and when additional information becomes available.
As outlined above, we use judgments to evaluate whether or not the customer has obtained control of the product and considers the several indicators in evaluating whether or not control has transferred to the customer. Not all of the indicators need to be met for us to conclude that control has transferred to the customer.
Contract Assets/Liabilities
The Company sells stand-alone software that is subject to softwaretiming of revenue recognition, guidance. The Company periodically reviews selling pricesbillings and cash collections may result in accounts receivable, contract assets, and contract liabilities (deferred revenue) on our Consolidated Balance Sheets. A receivable is recorded in the period we deliver products or provide services when we have an unconditional right to determine whether VSOE exists,payment. Contract assets primarily relate to the value of products and in situations whereservices transferred to the Companycustomer for which the right to payment is unablenot just dependent on the passage of time. Contract assets are transferred to establish VSOE for undelivered elements such as post-contract service, revenuereceivable when rights to payment become unconditional.
A contract liability is recognized ratably over the termwhen we receive payment or have an unconditional right to payment in advance of the service contract.
satisfaction of performance. The Company also defers the fair value of non-standard warranty bundled with equipment sales as unearned revenue. Non-standard warranty includes services incrementalcontract liabilities represent (1) deferred product revenue related to the standard 40-hour per week coverage for 12 months. Non-standard warranty is recognized ratably as revenue when the applicable warranty term period commences.
The deferred system profit balance equals the value of products that have been shipped and billed to customers and for which havethe control has not metbeen transferred to the Company’scustomers, and (2) deferred service revenue, recognition criteria, less applicable productwhich is recorded when we receive consideration, or such consideration is unconditionally due, from a customer prior to transferring services to the customer under the terms of a contract. Deferred service revenue typically results from warranty services, and warranty costs. Deferredmaintenance and other service contracts.
Contract assets and liabilities related to rights and obligations in a contract are recorded net in the Consolidated Balance Sheets. Upon the adoption of ASC 606, deferred costs of revenue are included in other current assets while under the legacy guidance deferred costs of revenue was included in deferred system profit does not include the profit associated with product shipments to certain customers in Japan, to whom title does not transfer until customer acceptance. Shipments to such customers in Japan are classified as inventory at cost until the time of acceptance.profit.
Research and Development Costs. Research and development costs are expensed as incurred.
Shipping and Handling Costs. Shipping and handling costs are included as a component of cost of sales.

Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation Plans. The Company accountsWe account for stock-based awards granted to employees for services based on the fair value of those awards. The fair value of stock-based awards is measured at the grant date and is recognized as expense over the employee’s requisite service period. The fair value for restricted stock units granted without “dividend equivalent” rights is determined using the closing price of the Company’sour common stock on the grant date, adjusted to exclude the present value of dividends which are not accrued on the restricted stock units. The fair value for restricted stock units granted with “dividend equivalent” rights is determined using the closing price of the Company’sour common stock on the grant date. The award holder is not entitled to receive payments under dividend equivalent rights unless the associated restricted stock unit award vests (i.e., the award holder is entitled to receive credits, payable in cash or shares of the Company’s common stock, equal to the cash dividends that would have been received on the shares of our common stock underlying the restricted stock units had the shares been issued and outstanding on the dividend record date, but such dividend equivalents are only paid subject to the recipient satisfying the vesting requirements of the underlying award). Compensation expense for restricted stock units with performance metrics is calculated based upon expected achievement of the metrics specified in the grant, or when a grant contains a market condition, the grant date fair value using a Monte Carlo simulation. The Monte Carlo simulation incorporates estimates of the potential outcomes of the market condition on the grant date fair value of each award. Additionally, the Company estimateswe estimate forfeitures based on historical experience and revisesrevise those estimates in subsequent periods if actual forfeitures differ from the estimated amounts. The fair value is determined using a Black-Scholes valuation model for purchase rights under theour Employee Stock Purchase Plan. The Black-Scholes option-pricing model requires the input of assumptions, including the option’s expected term and the expected price volatility of the underlying stock. The expected stock price volatility assumption is based on the market-based historical implied volatility from traded options of the Company’sour common stock.
Accounting for Cash-Based Long-Term Incentive Compensation. Cash-based long-term incentive (“Cash LTI”) awards issued to employees under the Company’sour Cash LTI program vests in three or four equal installments, with one-third or one-fourth of the aggregate amount of the Cash LTI award vesting on each yearly anniversary of the grant date over a three or four-year period. In order to receive payments under a Cash LTI award, participants must remain employed by the Companyus as of the applicable award vesting date. Compensation expense related to the Cash LTI awards is recognized over the vesting term which isand adjusted for the impact of estimated forfeitures.
Accounting for Non-qualified Deferred Compensation Plan. The Company hasWe have a non-qualified deferred compensation plan (known as “Executive Deferred Savings Plan”) under which certain executives and non-employee directors may defer a portion of their compensation. Participants are credited with returns based on their allocation of their account balances among measurement funds. The Company controlsWe control the investment of these funds, and the participants remain general creditors of the Company. The Company investsours. We invest these funds in certain mutual funds and such investments are classified as trading securities in the consolidated balance sheets.Consolidated Balance Sheets. Investments in trading securities are measured at fair value in the statement of financial position. Unrealized holding gains and losses for trading securities are included in earnings. Distributions from the Executive Deferred Savings Plan commence following a participant’s retirement or termination of employment or on a specified date allowed per the Executive Deferred Savings Plan provisions, except in cases where such distributions are required to be delayed in order to avoid a prohibited distribution under Internal Revenue Code Section 409A. Participants can generally elect the distributions to be paid in lump sum or quarterly cash payments over a scheduled period for up to 15 years and are allowed to make subsequent changes to their existing elections as permissible under the Executive Deferred Savings Plan provisions. The liability associated with the Executive Deferred Savings Plan is included as a component of other current liabilities in the consolidated balance sheets.Consolidated Balance Sheets. Changes in the Executive Deferred Savings Plan liability is recorded in selling, general and administrative expense in the consolidated statementsConsolidated Statements of operations.Operations. The expense (benefit) associated with changes in the liability included in selling, general and

administrative expense was $20.9$13.6 million, $(0.8)$19.9 million and $10.4$20.9 million for the fiscal years ended June 30, 2019, 2018 and 2017, 2016 and 2015, respectively. The CompanyWe also hashave a deferred compensation asset that corresponds to the liability under the Executive Deferred Savings Plan and it is included as a component of other non-current assets in the consolidated balance sheets.Consolidated Balance Sheets. Changes in the Executive Deferred Savings Plan assets are recorded as gains (losses), net in selling, general and administrative expense in the consolidated statementsConsolidated Statements of operations.Operations. The amount of net gains included in selling, general and administrative expense were $20.8$14.7 million, $0.1$19.5 million and $10.4$20.8 million for the fiscal years ended June 30, 2019, 2018 and 2017, 2016 and 2015, respectively.
Income Taxes. The Company accountsWe account for income taxes in accordance with the authoritative guidance, which requires that deferredincome tax effects for changes in tax laws are recognized in the period in which the law is enacted.
Transition tax liability is recognized in the period when the change in the U.S. tax law was enacted and the income tax effects are recorded as a component of provision for income taxes from continuing operations. Several inputs were considered in the calculation, such as the calculation of the post-1986 foreign earnings and profit (“E&P”), income tax pools for all foreign subsidiaries, and the amount of those earnings held in cash and other specified assets. We applied the current interpretations from the U.S. federal and state governments and regulatory organization in its calculation of the transition tax liability.

Deferred tax assets and liabilities beare recognized using enacted tax rates for the effect of temporary differences between the book and tax bases of recorded assets and liabilities. The guidance also requires that deferred tax assets be reduced by a valuation allowance if it is more likely than not that certaina portion of the deferred tax asset will not be realized. The Company hasWe have determined that a valuation allowance is necessary against certaina portion of the deferred tax assets, but it anticipateswe anticipate that itsour future taxable income will be sufficient to recover the remainder of itsour deferred tax assets. However, should there be a change in the Company’sour ability to recover itsour deferred tax assets that are not subject to a valuation allowance, the Companywe could be required to record an additional valuation allowance against such deferred tax assets. This would result in an increase to the Company’sour tax provision in the period in which the Company determineswe determine that the recovery is not probable.
On a quarterly basis, we provide for income taxes based upon an estimated annual effective income tax rate. The effective tax rate is highly dependent upon the geographic composition of worldwide earnings, tax regulations governing each region, availability of tax credits and the effectiveness of our tax planning strategies. We carefully monitor the changes in many factors and adjust our effective income tax rate on a timely basis. If actual results differ from these estimates, this could have a material effect on our financial condition and results of operations.
The Company applies a two-step approach,calculation of our tax liabilities involves dealing with uncertainties in the application of complex tax regulations. In accordance with the authoritative guidance on accounting for uncertainty in income taxes, we recognize liabilities for uncertain tax positions based on authoritative guidance, to recognizing and measuring uncertain tax positions.the two-step process. The first step is to evaluate the tax position for recognition by determining if the weight of available evidence indicates that it is more likely than not that the position will be sustained in audit, including resolution of related appeals or litigation processes, if any. The second step is to measure the tax benefit as the largest amount that is more than 50% likely of being realized upon ultimate settlement. The Company reevaluatesWe reevaluate these uncertain tax positions on a quarterly basis. This evaluation is based on factors including, but not limited to, changes in facts or circumstances, changes in tax law, effectively settled issues under audit and new audit activity. Any change in these factors could result in the recognition of a tax benefit or an additional charge to the tax provision.
We record income taxes on the undistributed earnings of foreign subsidiaries unless the subsidiaries’ earnings are considered indefinitely reinvested outside the U.S. Our effective tax rate would be adversely affected if we change our intent or if such undistributed earnings are needed for U.S. operations because we would be required to provide or pay income taxes on some or all of these undistributed earnings.
Global Intangible Low-Taxed Income. The Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (the “Act”) includes provisions for Global Intangible Low-Taxed Income (“GILTI”) wherein taxes on foreign income are imposed in excess of a deemed return on tangible assets of foreign corporations. This income will effectively be taxed at a 10.5% tax rate in general. As a result, our deferred tax assets and liabilities were being evaluated to determine if the deferred tax assets and liabilities should be recognized for the basis differences expected to reverse as a result of GILTI provisions that are effective for us after the fiscal year ending June 30, 2018, or should the tax on GILTI provisions be recognized as period costs in each year incurred. We elected to account for GILTI as a component of current period tax expense starting from the first quarter of the fiscal year ending June 30, 2019.
Business Combinations. Accounting for business combinations requires management to make significant estimates and assumptions to determine the fair values of assets acquired and liabilities assumed at the acquisition date. Although we believe the assumptions and estimates we have made in the past have been reasonable and appropriate, they are based, in part, on historical experience and information obtained from management of the acquired companies and are inherently uncertain. Critical estimates in valuing certain acquired intangible assets include, but are not limited to future expected cash flows including revenue growth rate assumptions from product sales, customer contracts and acquired technologies, expected costs to develop in-process research and development into commercially viable products, estimated cash flows from the projects when completed, including assumptions associated with the technology migration curve, estimated royalty rates used in valuing technology related intangible assets, and discount rates. The discount rates used to discount expected future cash flows to present value are typically derived from a weighted-average cost of capital analysis and adjusted to reflect inherent risks. Unanticipated events and circumstances may occur that could affect either the accuracy or validity of such assumptions, estimates or actual results.
We allocate the fair value of the purchase price of our acquisitions to the tangible assets acquired, liabilities assumed, and intangible assets acquired, including in-process research and development (“IPR&D”), based on their estimated fair values. The excess of the fair value of the purchase price over the fair values of these net tangible and intangible assets acquired is recorded as goodwill. Management’s estimates of fair value are based upon assumptions believed to be reasonable, but our estimates and assumptions are inherently uncertain and subject to refinement. As a result, during the measurement period, which will not exceed one year from the acquisition date, we record adjustments to the assets acquired and liabilities assumed with the corresponding offset to goodwill. Upon the conclusion of the measurement period or final determination of the fair value of the purchase price of our acquisitions, whichever comes first, any subsequent adjustments are recorded to our Consolidated Statements of Operations.

The fair value of IPR&D is initially capitalized as an intangible asset with an indefinite life and assessed for impairment thereafter whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying value of the IPR&D assets may not be recoverable. Impairment of IPR&D is recorded to research and development expenses. When an IPR&D project is completed, the IPR&D is reclassified as an amortizable purchased intangible asset and amortized to costs of revenues over the asset’s estimated useful life.
Acquisition-related expenses are recognized separately from the business combination and are expensed as incurred.
Net Income Per Share. Basic net income per share is calculated by dividing net income available to common stockholders by the weighted-average number of common shares outstanding during the period. Diluted net income per share is calculated by using the weighted-average number of common shares outstanding during the period increased to include the number of additional shares of common stock that would have been outstanding if the dilutive potential shares of common stock had been issued. The dilutive effect of restricted stock units and options is reflected in diluted net income per share by application of the treasury stock method. The dilutive securities are excluded from the computation of diluted net loss per share when a net loss is recorded for the period as their effect would be anti-dilutive.
Contingencies and Litigation. The Company isWe are subject to the possibility of losses from various contingencies. Considerable judgment is necessary to estimate the probability and amount of any loss from such contingencies. An accrual is made when it is probable that a liability has been incurred or an asset has been impaired and the amount of loss can be reasonably estimated. The Company accruesWe accrue a liability and recognizesrecognize as expense the estimated costs expected to be incurred over the next twelve months to defend or settle asserted and unasserted claims existing as of the balance sheet date. See Note 13,14, “Commitments and Contingencies” and Note 14,15, “Litigation and Other Legal Matters” for additional details.
Reclassifications. Certain reclassifications have been made to prior year financial statements to conform to the current year presentation. The reclassifications had no effect on the Consolidated Statements of Operations, Comprehensive Income, Stockholder’s Equity and Cash Flows.
Recent Accounting Pronouncements
Recently Adopted
In April 2015,May 2014, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued an accounting standard update for customer’s cloud based fees. TheASC 606, which supersedes the guidance changes whatin ASC 605, Revenue Recognition (“ASC 605”). Under ASC 606, revenue is recognized when a customer must consider in determining whether a cloud computing arrangement contains a software license. If the arrangement contains a software license, the customer would account for the fees related to the software license element in accordance with guidance related to internal use software; if the arrangement does not contain a software license, the customer would account for the arrangement as a service contract. The Company adopted this update beginning in the first quarter of its fiscal year ended June 30, 2017 on a prospective basis and there was no impact of adoption on its consolidated financial statements.

In September 2015, the FASB issued an accounting standard update on simplifying the accounting for measurement-period adjustments for business combinations. This standard requires an acquirer in a business combination to recognize an impact of a measurement period adjustment in the reporting period in which the adjustment amounts are determined, rather than retrospectively adjusting previously reported amounts. The standard is effective for the Company beginning in the first quarter of its fiscal year ended June 30, 2017.  The Company adopted the standard in the fiscal year ended June 30, 2017 and there was no impact of adoption on its consolidated financial statements.
In March 2016, the FASB issued an accounting standard update to simplify certain aspects of share-based payment awards to employees, including the accounting for income taxes, an option to recognize gross stock-based compensation expense with actual forfeitures recognized as they occur and statutory tax withholding requirements, as well as certain classifications in the statement of cash flows. The update is effective for the Company beginning in the first quarter of its fiscal year ending June 30, 2018, with early adoption permitted and all of the guidance must be adopted in the same period. However, the Company elected to early-adopt this standard update beginning in the first quarter of its fiscal year ended June 30, 2017.
Impact to Consolidated Statements of Operations
The primary impact of adopting the standard update is a change in the recording of the excess tax benefits or deficiencies from share-based payments. Before adoption, the Company recognized the excess tax benefits or deficiencies related to stock-based compensation as a credit or charge to additional paid-in capital (“APIC”) in the Company’s Consolidated Balance Sheets. Under the standard update, these excess tax benefits or deficiencies are recognized as a discrete tax benefit or discrete tax expense in the income tax provision in the Company’s Consolidated Statement of Operations. For the fiscal year ended June 30, 2017, the Company recognized a discrete tax benefit of $6.6 million related to net excess tax benefits mainly from stock-based compensation and dividend equivalents. The standard update requires companies to adopt the amendment related to accounting for excess tax benefits or deficiencies on a prospective basis only and as a result, prior periods were not retrospectively adjusted.
Impact to Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
In addition to the income tax consequence as described above, the standard update for share-based payment requires that cash flows from excess tax benefits related to share-based payments be reported as operating activities in the Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows. Previously, cash flows from excess tax benefit related to share-based payments were reported as financing activities. The standard update allows for two methods of adoption which are prospective or retrospective application. The Company elected to adopt this amendment on a prospective basis and as a result, prior periods were not retrospectively adjusted.
Updates Not Yet Effective
In May 2014, the FASB issued an accounting standard update regarding revenue from customer contracts to transfer goods and services or non-financial assets unless the contracts are covered by other standards (for example, insurance or lease contracts). Under the new guidance, an entity should recognize revenue in connection with the transferobtains control of promised goods or services to customers in an amount that reflects the consideration thatto which the entity expects to be entitled to receive in exchange for those goods or services. In addition, the new standardASC 606 requires that reporting companies discloseenhanced disclosures, including disclosure of the nature, amount, timing, and uncertainty of revenue and cash flows arising from contracts with customers. The new standard is effective forWe adopted the Company beginningASC 606 as of July 1, 2018 in theour first quarter of itsour fiscal year ending June 30, 2019, with early adoption permitted beginning inusing the first quarter of its fiscal year ending June 30, 2018. The new standard may be applied retrospectively to each prior period presented (“full retrospective transition method”) or retrospectively with the cumulative effect recognized as of the date of adoption (“modified retrospective transition method”). The FASB has also issued several amendmentsapproach. For additional detail, refer to the standard since its initial issuance. The Company intends to adopt the new standard in the first quarter of its fiscal year ending June 30, 2019 and elected a modified retrospective transition method to be applied to completed and incomplete contracts as of adoption date.
To address the significant implementation requirements of the accounting standard update, the Company has established a revenue project steering committee and cross-functional implementation team for the implementation of the standard, including a review of all significant revenue arrangements to identify any differences in the timing, measurement, presentation of revenue recognition including new disclosure requirements.




The Company has completed its preliminary assessment of the potential impact that the implementation of this new standard will have on its consolidated financial statements and believes the most significant impact may include the following:

The Company will account for the standard 12-month warranty for a majority of its products that is not separately paid for by the customers as a performance obligation since the Company provides for necessary repairs as well as preventive maintenance services for such products. The estimated fair value of the service will be deferred and recognized ratably as revenue over the warranty period.

The Company will generally recognize revenue for its products at a point of time based on judgment of whether or not the Company has satisfied its performance obligation by transferring control of the product to the customer. In evaluating whether or not control has been transferred to the customer, the Company will consider whether or not certain indicators have been met. Not all of the indicators need to be met for the Company to conclude that control has transferred to the customer. The Company will be required to use significant judgment to evaluate whether or not the factors indicate that the customer has obtained control of the product and the following factors will be considered in evaluating whether or not control has transferred to the customer: the Company has a present right to payment; the customer has legal title; the customer has physical possession; the customer has significant risk and rewards of ownership; and the customer has accepted the product, or whether customer acceptance is considered a formality based on history of acceptance of similar products.

The Company will recognize revenue for software licenses at the time of delivery since the Vendor Specific Objective Evidence (“VSOE”) requirement for undelivered element such as post-contract support is eliminated and companies are allowed to use established or best estimate selling price for the undelivered element to allocate and defer the revenue. As a result, the Company will recognize as revenue a portion of the sales price upon delivery of the software, compared to the current practice of recognizing the entire sales price ratably over the term of the service contract due to the lack of VSOE.
The Company will continue to assess the impact of the new standard, including potential changes to the accounting policies, business processes, systems and internal controls over financial reporting and its preliminary assessment of the impact is subject to change.
In July 2015, the FASB issued an accounting standard update for the subsequent measurement of inventory. The amended guidance requires entities to measure inventory at the lower of cost or net realizable value. Net realizable value is the estimated selling prices in the ordinary course of business, less reasonably predictable costs of completion, disposal and transportation. The requirement would replace the current lower of cost or market evaluation and the accounting guidance is unchanged for inventory measured using last-in, first-out (“LIFO”) or the retail inventory method. The update is effective for the Company beginning in the first quarter of the Company’s fiscal year ending June 30, 2018 and should be applied prospectively with early adoption permitted as of the beginning of an interim or annual reporting period. The Company does not expect that this accounting standard update will have a material effect on its consolidated financial statements upon adoption.Note 2 “Revenue.”
In January 2016, the FASB issued an accounting standard update that changes the accounting for financial instruments primarily related to equity investments (other than those accounted for under the equity method of accounting or those that result in consolidation of the investee), financial liabilities under the fair value option, and the presentation and disclosure requirements for financial instruments. The accounting standardWe adopted this update is effective for the Company beginning in the first quarter of itsour fiscal year ending June 30, 2019 on a prospective basis and earlythe adoption is permitted. The Company is currently evaluating thehad no material impact of this accounting standard update on its consolidated financial statements.our Consolidated Financial Statements.
In FebruaryAugust 2016, the FASB issued an accounting standard update which amends the existing accounting standards for leases. Consistent with current guidance, the recognition, measurement, and presentation of expensesintended to clarify how certain cash receipts and cash flows arising from a lease by a lessee primarily will depend on its classification. Underpayments are presented and classified in the new guidance, a lessee will be required to recognize assets and liabilities for all leases with lease termsstatement of more than 12 months. Thecash flows. We adopted this update is effective for the Company beginning in the first quarter of itsour fiscal year ending June 30, 2020 using2019 on a modified retrospective transition method. Earlybasis and the adoption is permitted. The Company is currently evaluating thehad no material impact of this accounting standard update on its consolidated financial statements.
In June 2016, the FASB issued an accounting standard update that changes the accounting for recognizing impairments of financial assets. Under the update, credit losses for certain types of financial instruments will be estimated based on expected losses. The update also modifies the impairment models for available-for-sale debt securities and for purchased financial assets with credit deterioration since their origination. The update is effective for the Company beginning in the first quarter of its fiscal year ending June 30, 2021, with early adoption permitted starting in the first quarter of fiscal year ending 2020. The Company is currently evaluating the impact of this accounting standard update on its consolidated financial statements.

our Consolidated Financial Statements.
In October 2016, the FASB issued an accounting standard update to recognize the income tax consequences of intra-entity transfers of assets other than inventory when they occur. This eliminates the exception to postpone recognition until the asset has been sold to an outside party. This standard is effective for the CompanyWe adopted this update beginning in the first quarter of itsour fiscal year ending June 30, 2019 and early adoption is permitted. It is required to be applied on a modified retrospective basis throughand the adoption had no material impact on our Consolidated Financial Statements.
In January 2017, the FASB issued an accounting standard on clarifying the definition of a cumulative-effect adjustmentbusiness, with the objective of adding guidance to assist entities with evaluating whether transactions should be accounted for as acquisitions (or disposals) of assets or businesses. We adopted this update beginning in the balance sheet asfirst quarter of the beginning of theour fiscal year of adoption. The Company is currently evaluatingending June 30, 2019 on a prospective basis and the adoption had no material impact of this accounting standard update on its consolidated financial statements.our Consolidated Financial Statements.

In January 2017, the FASB issued an accounting standard update to simplify the subsequent measurement of goodwill by removing the second step of the two-step impairment test, which requires an entity to determine the fair value of assets and liabilities similar to what is required in a purchase price allocation. Under the update, goodwill impairment will be calculated as the amount by which a reporting unit'sunit’s carrying value exceeds itsour fair value. This standard is effective for the Company beginningWe early adopted this update in the first quarter of its fiscal year ending 2021 and requires a prospective approach to adoption. Early adoption is permitted. The Company is currently evaluating the impact of this accounting standard update on its consolidated financial statements.
In January 2017, the FASB issued an accounting standard on clarifying the definition of a business, with the objective of adding guidance to assist entities with evaluating whether transactions should be accounted for as acquisitions (or disposals) of assets or businesses. The standard is effective for the Company for itsour fiscal year ending June 30, 2019.  The Company is currently evaluating2019 on a prospective basis and the adoption had no material impact of this accounting standard update on its consolidated financial statements. our Consolidated Financial Statements.
In March 2017, the FASB issued an accounting standard update that changes the income statementstatements of operations classification of net periodic benefit cost related to defined benefit pension and/or other postretirementpost-retirement benefit plans. Under the update, employers will present the service cost component of net periodic benefit cost in the same statementstatements of operations line item(s) as other employee compensation costs arising from services rendered during the period. Only the service cost component will be eligible for capitalization in assets. Employers will present the other components of the net periodic benefit costs separately from the line item(s) that includes the service cost and outside of any subtotal of operating income, if one is presented. The standard is effective for the CompanyWe adopted this update beginning in the first quarter of itsour fiscal year ending June 30, 2019 on a retrospective basis and earlythe adoption is permitted. It is required to be applied retrospectively, except for the provision regarding capitalization in assets which is required to be applied prospectively. The Company is currently evaluating thehad no material impact of this accounting standard update on its consolidated financial statements.our Consolidated Financial Statements.
In May 2017, the FASB issued an accounting standard update regarding stock compensation that provides guidance about which changes to the terms and conditions of a share-based payment award require an entity to apply modification accounting in order to reduce diversity in practice and reduce complexity. TheWe adopted this update is effective for the Company beginning in the first quarter of our fiscal year ending June 30, 2019 on a prospective basis and the Company’sadoption had no material impact on our Consolidated Financial Statements.
In August 2017, the FASB issued an accounting standard update to hedge accounting to better align risk management activities by refining financial and non-financial hedging strategy eligibilities. This update also amends the presentation and disclosure requirements to increase transparency to better understand an entity’s risk exposures and how hedging strategies are used to manage those exposures. We early adopted this update in the second quarter of our fiscal year ending June 30, 2019 under the modified retrospective approach. The cumulative effect adjustment for the elimination of the ineffectiveness was not material to our Consolidated Financial Statements. The presentation and disclosure have been amended on a prospective basis, as required by this update.
In February 2018, the FASB issued an accounting standard update that provides an option to reclassify disproportional tax effects and other income tax effects (“stranded tax effects”) caused by the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (“the Act”) from accumulated other comprehensive income (“AOCI”) to retained earnings. We early adopted this update in the first quarter of our fiscal year ending June 30, 2019 and shouldapplied this update in the period of adoption. As a result of the adoption, we made a reclassification from AOCI to beginning retained earnings of approximately $10.9 million related to the stranded tax effects.
Updates Not Yet Effective
In February 2016, the FASB issued an accounting standard update, Leases (Topic 842), (“ASC 842”) which supersedes the lease recognition requirements in Leases (Topic 840), (“ASC 840”). ASC 842 establishes a right- of-use (“ROU”) model that requires a lessee to record a ROU asset and a lease liability on the balance sheet for all leases. Consistent with ASC 840, leases will be applied prospectivelyclassified as either finance or operating, with classification affecting the pattern of expense recognition in the statements of operations. The new guidance will be effective for us starting in the first quarter of our fiscal year ending June 30, 2020. ASC 842 requires a modified retrospective transition approach for capital and operating leases existing at, or entered into after, the beginning of the earliest comparative period presented in the financial statements. In July 2018, the FASB issued an accounting standard update which amends ASC 842 and offers an additional (and optional) transition method by which entities may elect not to recast the comparative periods presented in financial statements in the period of adoption. This ASU has the same transition requirements and effective date as ASC 842. We will adopt ASC 842 using the optional adoption method and thereby not adjust comparative financial statements. Consequently, our reporting for the comparative periods presented in the year of adoption would continue to be in accordance with ASC 840, including the disclosure requirements of ASC 840. We currently plan to apply the package of practical expedients to leases that commenced before the effective date whereby we will elect to not reassess the following: (i) whether any expired or existing contracts contain leases; (ii) the lease classification for any expired or existing leases; and (iii) initial direct costs for any existing leases. We have enhanced system functionality to enable the preparation and reporting of financial information and are evaluating related processes and internal controls. We expect the most significant impact upon the adoption of this standard to be the recognition of ROU assets and lease liabilities on our Consolidated Balance Sheets. We do not expect the adoption of this standard will have a significant impact on our Consolidated Statements of Operations or Cash Flows.

In June 2016, the FASB issued an accounting standard update that changes the accounting for recognizing impairments of financial assets. Under the update, credit losses for certain types of financial instruments will be estimated based on expected losses. The update also modifies the impairment models for available-for-sale debt securities and for purchased financial assets with credit deterioration since their origination. This update is effective for us beginning in the first quarter of our fiscal year ending June 30, 2021, with early adoption permitted asstarting in the first quarter of the beginning of an interim or annual reporting period. The Company isfiscal year ending June 30, 2020. We are currently evaluating the impact of this accounting standard update on its consolidated financial statements.our Consolidated Financial Statements.
In August 2018, the FASB issued an accounting standard update which modifies the existing accounting standards for fair value measurement disclosure. This update eliminates the disclosure of the amount of and reasons for transfers between level 1 and level 2 of the fair value hierarchy, and the policy for timing of transfers between levels. This standard update is effective for us beginning in the first quarter of our fiscal year ending June 30, 2021, and early adoption is permitted. We are currently evaluating the impact of this accounting standard update on our Consolidated Financial Statements.
In August 2018, the FASB issued an accounting standard update to amend the disclosure requirements related to defined benefit pension and other post-retirement plans. Some of the changes include adding a disclosure requirement for significant gains and losses related to changes in the benefit obligation for the period and removing the amounts in accumulated other comprehensive income expected to be recognized as components of net periodic benefit cost over the next fiscal year. This standard update is effective for us beginning in the first quarter of the fiscal year ending June 30, 2021, and early adoption is permitted. We are currently evaluating the impact of this accounting standard update on our Consolidated Financial Statements.
In August 2018, the FASB issued an accounting standard update to align the requirements for capitalizing implementation costs incurred in a cloud computing arrangement that is a service contract with the requirements for capitalizing implementation costs incurred to develop or obtain internal-use software. The guidance clarifies which costs should be capitalized including the cost to acquire the license and the related implementation costs. This standard update is effective for us beginning in the first quarter of our fiscal year ending June 30, 2021, with an option to be adopted either prospectively or retrospectively. Early adoption is permitted. We are currently evaluating the impact of this accounting standard update on our Consolidated Financial Statements.
NOTE 2 — REVENUE
New Revenue Accounting Standard
Method and Impact of Adoption
At the beginning of the fiscal year 2019, we adopted ASC 606 using the modified retrospective transition approach for all contracts completed and not completed as of the date of adoption. Under the modified retrospective transition approach, periods prior to the adoption date were not adjusted and continue to be reported in accordance with ASC 605. A cumulative effect of applying ASC 606 was recorded to the beginning retained earnings to reflect the impact of all existing arrangements under ASC 606.
The cumulative effect of applying ASC 606 represents a net decrease to retained earnings of $21.0 million as of July 1, 2018, which primarily related to the following:
A decrease of approximately $97.0 million in retained earnings related to the deferral of estimated fair value of the warranty services provided with our products for which revenue will be recognized in future periods under ASC 606. Further, upon adoption of ASC 606, we recognize the standard warranty for a majority of products as a separate performance obligation, while in prior periods, we accounted for the estimated warranty cost as a charge to costs of revenues when revenue was recognized. This was partially offset by an increase in retained earnings of approximately $37.0 million related to reversal of standard warranty expense, which was charged to costs of revenues in prior periods.
An increase in retained earnings of approximately $26.0 million due to a change in the timing of transfer of control over products to the customers.
Under ASC 606, revenue is recognized earlier than it would have been recognized under legacy guidance primarily due to our assessment of timing of transfer of control. Additionally, we render standard warranty coverage on our products for 12 months, providing labor and parts necessary to repair and maintain the products during the warranty period. Prior to adoption of ASC 606, we accounted for the estimated warranty cost as a charge to costs of sales when revenue was recognized. Upon adoption of ASC 606, the standard warranty for the majority of products is recognized as a separate performance obligation in service revenue.

Consistent with our policy, revenue on the majority of Orbotech’s contracts is recognized upon delivery because this represents the point in time at which control is transferred to the customers. Revenues derived from performance obligations such as warranty and service contracts are recognized over the period of the service.
The following table, including the results from the acquisition of Orbotech, summarizes the effects of adopting ASC 606 on our Consolidated Balance Sheets as follows:
As of June 30, 2019 (In thousands)
As Reported Under
ASC 606
 
Prior to
Adoption of
ASC 606
 Effect of Changes
ASSETS     
Accounts receivable, net$990,113
 $1,097,098
 $(106,985)
Other current assets323,077
 158,342
 164,735
Deferred income taxes206,141
 195,537
 10,604
LIABILITIES     
Deferred system revenue$282,348
 $
 $282,348
Deferred service revenue206,669
 114,874
 91,795
Deferred system profit
 382,085
 (382,085)
Other current liabilities827,054
 853,253
 (26,199)
Deferred service revenue, non-current98,772
 88,289
 10,483
STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY
     
Retained earnings$714,825
 $622,989
 $91,836
Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss)(73,029) (73,205) 176
The following table, including the results from the acquisition of Orbotech, summarizes the effects of adopting ASC 606 on our Consolidated Statements of Operations as follows:
Year ended June 30, 2019 (In thousands, except per share amounts)
As Reported Under
ASC 606
 
Prior to
Adoption of
ASC 606
 Effect of Changes
Revenues:     
Product$3,392,243
 $3,356,837
 $35,406
Service1,176,661
 1,029,796
 146,865
Costs and expenses:     
Costs of revenues1,869,377
 1,819,060
 50,317
Other expense (income), net(31,462) (30,989) (473)
Provision for income taxes121,214
 101,838
 19,376
Net income attributable to KLA1,175,617
 1,062,566
 113,051
Net income per share attributable to KLA     
Basic$7.53
 $6.81
 $0.72
Diluted$7.49
 $6.77
 $0.72

Contract Balances
 As of As of    
(In thousands, except for percentage)June 30, 2019 July 1, 2018 $ Change % Change
Accounts receivable, net$990,113
 $635,878
 $354,235
 56%
Contract assets$94,015
 $14,727
 $79,288
 538%
Contract liabilities$587,789
 $556,691
 $31,098
 6%
Our payment terms and conditions vary by contract type, although terms generally include a requirement of payment of 70% to 90% of total contract consideration within 30 to 60 days of shipment, with the remainder payable within 30 days of acceptance.

The change in contract assets during the fiscal year ended June 30, 2019 was mainly due to an increase in contract assets of $76.3 million from the Orbotech Acquisition in the third quarter of fiscal year 2019 and $16.8 million of revenue recognized in excess of the amounts billed to the customers, partially offset by $14.7 million of contract assets reclassified to net accounts receivable as our right to consideration for these contract assets became unconditional. Contract assets are included in other current assets on our Consolidated Balance Sheets.
During the fiscal year ended June 30, 2019, we recognized revenue of $461.3 million that was included in contract liabilities as of July 1, 2018. This was partially offset by an increase in contract liabilities of $43.2 million from the Orbotech Acquisition in the third quarter of fiscal year 2019, and the value of products and services billed to customers for which control of the products and service has not transferred to the customers. Contract liabilities are included in current and non-current liabilities on our Consolidated Balance Sheets.

Remaining Performance Obligations
As of June 30, 2019, we had $1.84 billion of remaining performance obligations, which represents our obligation to deliver products and services, and consists primarily of sales orders where written customer requests have been received. We expect to recognize approximately 5% to 15% of these performance obligations as revenue beyond the next twelve months, subject to risk of delays, pushouts, and cancellation by the customer, usually with limited or no penalties.
Refer to Note 17 “Segment Reporting and Geographic Information” for information related to revenue by geographic region as well as significant product and service offerings.
Practical expedients
We apply the following practical expedients:
We account for shipping and handling costs as activities to fulfill the promise to transfer the goods, instead of a promised service to our customer.
We have elected to not adjust the promised amount of consideration for the effects of a significant financing component as we expect, at contract inception, that the period between when the entity transfers a promised good or service to a customer and when the customer pays for that good or service will generally be one year or less.
We have elected to expense costs to obtain a contract as incurred because the expected amortization period is one year or less.
We have elected to reflect the aggregate effect of all modifications that occurred before July 1, 2018 in determining the transaction price, identifying the satisfied and unsatisfied performance obligations, and allocating the transaction price to the performance obligations.

NOTE 3 — FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTS
The Company’sOur financial assets and liabilities are measured and recorded at fair value, except for our debt and certain equity investments in privately-held companies. ThesePrior to July 1, 2018, the equity investments arewere generally accounted for under the cost method of accounting and arewere periodically assessed for other-than-temporary impairment when an event or circumstance indicatesindicated that an other-than-temporary decline in value may have occurred. Effective July 1, 2018, equity investments without a readily available fair value are accounted for using the measurement alternative. The Company’smeasurement alternative is calculated as cost minus impairment, if any, plus or minus changes resulting from observable price changes.
Our non-financial assets, such as goodwill, intangible assets, and land, property and equipment, are recorded at cost and are assessed for impairment when an event or circumstance indicates that an other-than-temporary decline in value may have occurred.

Fair Value of Financial Instruments. KLA-Tencor hasWe have evaluated the estimated fair value of financial instruments using available market information and valuations as provided by third-party sources. The use of different market assumptions and/or estimation methodologies could have a significant effect on the estimated fair value amounts. The fair value of the Company’sour cash equivalents, accounts receivable, accounts payable and other current assets and liabilities approximate their carrying amounts due to the relatively short maturity of these items.
Fair Value Hierarchy. The authoritative guidance for fair value measurements establishes a fair value hierarchy that prioritizes the inputs to valuation techniques used to measure fair value. The hierarchy gives the highest priority to unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities (Level 1 measurements) and the lowest priority to unobservable inputs (Level 3 measurements). The three levels of the fair value hierarchy are described below:
Level 1  Valuations based on quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities that the entity has the ability to access.
   
Level 2  Valuations based on quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities, quoted prices in markets that are not active, or other inputs that are observable or can be corroborated by observable data for substantially the full term of the assets or liabilities.
   
Level 3  Valuations based on inputs that are supported by little or no market activity and that are significant to the fair value of the assets or liabilities.
A financial instrument’s level within the fair value hierarchy is based on the lowest level of any input that is significant to the fair value measurement.
The Company’s financial instruments were classified within Level 1 or Level 2As of the fair value hierarchy as of June 30, 2017, because they were valued using quoted market prices, broker/dealer quotes or alternative pricing sources with observable levels of price transparency. As of June 30, 2017,2019, the types of instruments valued based on quoted market prices in active markets included money market funds, certain U.S. Treasury securities and certain U.S. Government agency securities. Such instruments are generally classified within Level 1 of the fair value hierarchy.
As of June 30, 2017, theThe types of instruments valued based on other observable inputs included corporate debt securities, sovereign securities, municipal securities, certain U.S. Treasury securities and certain U.S. Government agency securities .securities. The market inputs used to value these instruments generally consist of market yields, reported trades and broker/dealer quotes. Such instruments are generally classified within Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy.
The principal market in which the Company executes itswe execute our foreign currency contracts is the institutional market in an over-the-counter environment with a relatively high level of price transparency. The market participants generally are large financial institutions. The Company’sOur foreign currency contracts’ valuation inputs are based on quoted prices and quoted pricing intervals from public data sources and do not involve management judgment. These contracts are typically classified within Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy.

    Financial assets (excluding cash held in operating accounts and time deposits) and liabilities measured atThe fair value on a recurring basis as of deferred payments and contingent consideration payable, the date indicated belowmajority of which were presented onrecorded in connection with business combinations during the Company’s Consolidated Balance Sheet as follows:
As of June 30, 2017 (In thousands)Total 
Quoted Prices in
Active Markets
for Identical
Assets (Level 1)
 
Significant Other
Observable Inputs
(Level 2)
Assets     
Cash equivalents:     
Corporate debt securities$76,472
 $
 $76,472
Money market funds and other616,039
 616,039
 
U.S. Government agency securities117,417
 
 117,417
Sovereign securities10,050
 
 10,050
Marketable securities:     
Corporate debt securities1,042,723
 
 1,042,723
Sovereign securities42,515
 
 42,515
U.S. Government agency securities391,409
 368,121
 23,288
U.S. Treasury securities373,299
 373,299
 
Total cash equivalents and marketable securities(1)
2,669,924
 1,357,459
 1,312,465
Other current assets:     
Derivative assets5,931
 
 5,931
Other non-current assets:     
Executive Deferred Savings Plan182,150
 136,145
 46,005
Total financial assets(1)
$2,858,005
 $1,493,604
 $1,364,401
Liabilities     
Other current liabilities:     
Derivative liabilities$(1,275) $
 $(1,275)
Total financial liabilities$(1,275) $
 $(1,275)
__________________ 
(1) Excludes cash of $307.4 million held in operating accounts and time deposits of $39.4 million as offiscal year ended June 30, 2017.2019, were classified as Level 3 and estimated using significant inputs that were not observable in the market. See Note 6 “Business Combinations” for additional information.

Financial assets (excluding cash held in operating accounts and time deposits) and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis as of the date indicated below were presented on the Company’sour Consolidated Balance SheetSheets as follow
As of June 30, 2019 (In thousands)Total 
Quoted Prices
in Active Markets
for Identical
Assets (Level 1)
 
Significant 
Other
Observable 
Inputs
(Level 2)
 
Little or No
Market Activity Inputs (Level 3)
Assets       
Cash equivalents:       
Corporate debt securities$10,988
 $
 $10,988
 $
Money market funds and other352,708
 352,708
 
 
U.S. Government agency securities27,994
 
 27,994
 
U.S. Treasury securities55,858
 
 55,858
 
Marketable securities:       
Corporate debt securities422,089
 
 422,089
 
Municipal securities1,913
 
 1,913
  
Sovereign securities5,994
 
 5,994
 
U.S. Government agency securities131,224
 131,224
 
 
U.S. Treasury securities151,838
 151,838
 
 
Total cash equivalents and marketable securities(1)
1,160,606
 635,770
 524,836
 
Other current assets:       
Derivative assets2,557
 
 2,557
 
Other non-current assets:       
Executive Deferred Savings Plan207,581
 158,021
 49,560
 
Total financial assets(1)
$1,370,744
 $793,791
 $576,953
 $
Liabilities       
Derivative liabilities$(3,334) $
 $(3,334) $
Deferred payments(8,800) 
 
 (8,800)
Contingent consideration payable(14,005) 
 
 (14,005)
Total financial liabilities$(26,139) $
 $(3,334) $(22,805)
__________________ 
(1)Excludes cash of $479.8 million held in operating accounts and time deposits of $99.0 million as of June 30, 2019.

Financial assets (excluding cash held in operating accounts and time deposits) and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis as of the date indicated below were presented on our Consolidated Balance Sheets as follows: 
As of June 30, 2016 (In thousands)Total 
Quoted Prices in
Active Markets
for Identical
Assets (Level 1)
 
Significant Other
Observable Inputs
(Level 2)
As of June 30, 2018 (In thousands)Total 
Quoted Prices in
Active Markets
for Identical
Assets (Level 1)
 
Significant Other
Observable Inputs
(Level 2)
Assets          
Cash equivalents:          
Corporate debt securities$20,569
 $
 $20,569
$4,995
 $
 $4,995
Money market funds and other626,156
 626,156
 
863,115
 863,115
 
U.S. Government agency securities7,675
 
 7,675
U.S. Treasury securities68,748
 68,748
 
1,996
 
 1,996
Marketable securities:          
Corporate debt securities657,905
 
 657,905
735,408
 
 735,408
Municipal securities5,016
 
 5,016
Sovereign securities41,257
 6,426
 34,831
17,142
 
 17,142
U.S. Government agency securities405,705
 385,731
 19,974
316,022
 299,501
 16,521
U.S. Treasury securities258,754
 258,754
 
405,654
 364,574
 41,080
Total cash equivalents and marketable securities(1)
2,084,110
 1,345,815
 738,295
2,352,007
 1,527,190
 824,817
Other current assets:          
Derivative assets1,095
 
 1,095
5,385
 
 5,385
Other non-current assets:          
Executive Deferred Savings Plan162,160
 106,149
 56,011
197,213
 143,580
 53,633
Total financial assets(1)
$2,247,365
 $1,451,964
 $795,401
$2,554,605
 $1,670,770
 $883,835
Liabilities          
Other current liabilities:     
Derivative liabilities$(11,647) $
 $(11,647)$(6,828) $
 $(6,828)
Total financial liabilities$(11,647) $
 $(11,647)$(6,828) $
 $(6,828)
__________________ 
(1) Excludes cash of $330.1 million held in operating accounts and time deposits of $77.1 million as of June 30, 2016.
(1)Excludes cash of $473.8 million held in operating accounts and time deposits of $54.5 million as of June 30, 2018. 
There were no transfers between Level 1 and Level 2 fair value measurements during the fiscal year ended June 30, 20172019 or 20162018. The CompanyWe did not have any assets or liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis within Level 3 fair value measurements as of June 30, 2017 or 20162018. See Note 8 “Debt” for disclosure of the fair value of our Senior Notes.

NOTE 34 — FINANCIAL STATEMENT COMPONENTS
Consolidated Balance Sheets
As of June 30,As of June 30,
(In thousands)2017 20162019 2018
Accounts receivable, net:      
Accounts receivable, gross$592,753
 $634,905
$1,002,114
 $663,317
Allowance for doubtful accounts(21,636) (21,672)(12,001) (11,639)
$571,117
 $613,233
$990,113
 $651,678
Inventories:      
Customer service parts$245,172
 $234,712
$328,515
 $253,639
Raw materials240,389
 208,689
444,627
 331,065
Work-in-process193,026
 187,733
285,191
 280,208
Finished goods54,401
 67,501
204,167
 66,933
$732,988
 $698,635
$1,262,500
 $931,845
Other current assets:      
Contract assets$94,015
 $
Deferred costs of revenue(1)
70,721
 
Prepaid expenses$36,146
 $37,127
88,387
 47,088
Income tax related receivables22,071
 18,190
Prepaid income and other taxes51,889
 23,452
Other current assets13,004
 9,553
18,065
 14,619
$71,221
 $64,870
$323,077
 $85,159
Land, property and equipment, net:      
Land$40,617
 $40,603
$67,883
 $40,599
Buildings and leasehold improvements319,306
 313,239
402,678
 335,647
Machinery and equipment551,277
 507,378
669,316
 577,077
Office furniture and fixtures21,328
 21,737
28,282
 22,171
Construction-in-process4,597
 5,286
26,029
 9,180
937,125
 888,243
1,194,188
 984,674
Less: accumulated depreciation and amortization(653,150) (610,229)
Less: accumulated depreciation(745,389) (698,368)
$283,975
 $278,014
$448,799
 $286,306
Other non-current assets:      
Executive Deferred Savings Plan$182,150
 $162,160
$207,581
 $197,213
Other non-current assets13,526
 12,499
58,392
 38,869
$195,676
 $174,659
$265,973
 $236,082
Other current liabilities:      
Executive Deferred Savings Plan$183,603
 $162,289
$208,926
 $199,505
Compensation and benefits172,707
 224,496
226,462
 173,774
Other accrued expenses196,177
 123,869
Customer credits and advances95,188
 81,994
133,677
 116,440
Interest payable19,396
 19,395
Warranty45,458
 34,773
6,470
 42,258
Income taxes payable17,040
 27,964
23,350
 23,287
Other accrued expenses116,039
 111,297
Interest payable31,992
 16,947
$649,431
 $662,208
$827,054
 $696,080
Other non-current liabilities:      
Pension liabilities$72,801
 $69,418
$79,622
 $66,786
Income taxes payable68,439
 50,365
392,266
 371,665
Other non-current liabilities31,167
 36,840
116,009
 54,791
$172,407
 $156,623
$587,897
 $493,242



________________
(1)Deferred costs of revenue were previously included under deferred system profit prior to the adoption of ASC 606.
Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss)
The components of accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) (“OCI”) as of the dates indicated below were as follows:
(In thousands)Currency Translation Adjustments Unrealized Gains (Losses) on Available-for-Sale Securities Unrealized Gains (Losses) on Cash Flow Hedges Unrealized Gains (Losses) on Defined Benefit Plans Total
Balance as of June 30, 2017$(30,654) $(3,869) $5,221
 $(22,021) $(51,323)
          
Balance as of June 30, 2016$(32,424) $3,451
 $775
 $(20,487) $(48,685)
          
(In thousands)Currency Translation Adjustments Unrealized Gains (Losses) on Available-for-Sale Securities Unrealized Gains (Losses) on Cash Flow Hedges Unrealized Gains (Losses) on Defined Benefit Plans Total
Balance as of June 30, 2019$(44,041) $(1,616) $(8,725) $(18,647) $(73,029)
          
Balance as of June 30, 2018$(29,974) $(11,032) $1,932
 $(14,859) $(53,933)
          
The effects on net income of amounts reclassified from accumulated OCI to the Consolidated Statements of Operations for the indicated periods were as follows (in thousands):
 Location in the Consolidated Statements of Operations Year ended June 30, Location in the Consolidated Statements of Operations Year ended June 30,
Accumulated OCI Components 2017 2016 2019 2018
Unrealized gains (losses) on cash flow hedges from foreign exchange and interest rate contracts(1) Revenues $2,846
 $(2,926) Revenues $4,329
 $955
 Costs of revenues (378) (1,551) Costs of revenues and operating expenses (739) 2,137
 Interest expense 754
 755
 Interest expense 424
 754
 Net gains reclassified from accumulated OCI $3,222
 $(3,722) Other expense (income), net 4
 
     Net gains reclassified from accumulated OCI $4,018
 $3,846
    
Unrealized gains (losses) on available-for-sale securities Other expense (income), net $191
 $312
 Other expense (income), net $(1,294) $(209)
________________
(1)Reflects the adoption of the new accounting guidance for hedge accounting in the second quarter of fiscal year 2019. For additional details, refer to Note 16, “Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities.”
The amounts reclassified out of accumulated OCI related to the Company’sour defined benefit pension plans, which were recognized as a component of net periodic cost for the fiscal years ended June 30, 20172019 and 20162018 were $1.9$1.1 million and $1.4$1.8 million, respectively. For additional details, refer to Note 11,12, “Employee Benefit Plans.”
Consolidated Statements of Operations
The following table shows other expense (income), net for the indicated periods:
Year ended June 30,Year ended June 30,
(In thousands)2017 2016 20152019 2018 2017
Other expense (income), net:          
Interest income$(23,270) $(14,507) $(12,545)$(40,367) $(36,869) $(23,270)
Foreign exchange losses, net641
 1,235
 1,764
Net realized gains on sale of investments(191) (311) (2,119)
Foreign exchange (gains) losses, net(322) 708
 641
Net realized losses (gains) on sale of investments1,294
 209
 (191)
Other3,359
 (7,051) 2,431
7,933
 5,470
 5,998
$(19,461) $(20,634) $(10,469)$(31,462) $(30,482) $(16,822)

NOTE 45 — MARKETABLE SECURITIES
The amortized cost and fair value of marketable securities as of the dates indicated below were as follows:
As of June 30, 2017 (In thousands)
Amortized
Cost
 
Gross
Unrealized
Gains
 
Gross
Unrealized
Losses
 Fair Value
Corporate debt securities$1,120,548
 $598
 $(1,951) $1,119,195
Money market funds and other616,039
 
 
 616,039
Sovereign securities52,621
 
 (56) 52,565
U.S. Government agency securities510,553
 62
 (1,789) 508,826
U.S. Treasury securities374,676
 52
 (1,429) 373,299
Subtotal2,674,437
 712
 (5,225) 2,669,924
Add: Time deposits(1)
39,389
 
 
 39,389
Less: Cash equivalents845,639
 
 (15) 845,624
Marketable securities$1,868,187
 $712
 $(5,210) $1,863,689
       
As of June 30, 2016 (In thousands)
Amortized
Cost
 
Gross
Unrealized
Gains
 
Gross
Unrealized
Losses
 Fair Value
As of June 30, 2019 (In thousands)
Amortized
Cost
 
Gross
Unrealized
Gains
 
Gross
Unrealized
Losses
 Fair Value
Corporate debt securities$676,259
 $2,372
 $(157) $678,474
$433,518
 $141
 $(582) $433,077
Money market funds and other626,156
 
 
 626,156
352,708
 
 
 352,708
Municipal securities5,014
 2
 
 5,016
1,910
 3
 
 1,913
Sovereign securities41,224
 38
 (5) 41,257
6,001
 1
 (8) 5,994
U.S. Government agency securities404,889
 830
 (14) 405,705
159,454
 5
 (241) 159,218
U.S. Treasury securities326,321
 1,181
 
 327,502
208,058
 39
 (401) 207,696
Subtotal2,079,863
 4,423
 (176) 2,084,110
1,161,649
 189
 (1,232) 1,160,606
Add: Time deposits(1)
77,131
 
 
 77,131
99,006
 
 
 99,006
Less: Cash equivalents778,451
 1
 (17) 778,435
536,206
 17
 (2) 536,221
Marketable securities$1,378,543
 $4,422
 $(159) $1,382,806
$724,449
 $172
 $(1,230) $723,391
       
As of June 30, 2018 (In thousands)
Amortized
Cost
 
Gross
Unrealized
Gains
 
Gross
Unrealized
Losses
 Fair Value
Corporate debt securities$747,763
 $148
 $(7,508) $740,403
Money market funds and other863,115
 
 
 863,115
Sovereign securities17,293
 
 (151) 17,142
U.S. Government agency securities326,508
 16
 (2,827) 323,697
U.S. Treasury securities411,329
 3
 (3,682) 407,650
Subtotal2,366,008
 167
 (14,168) 2,352,007
Add: Time deposits(1)
54,537
 
 
 54,537
Less: Cash equivalents930,608
 
 
 930,608
Marketable securities$1,489,937
 $167
 $(14,168) $1,475,936
__________________ 
(1)Time deposits excluded from fair value measurements. 
(1) Time deposits excluded from fair value measurements.
KLA-Tencor’sOur investment portfolio consists of both corporate and government securities that have a maximum maturity of three years. The longer the duration of these securities, the more susceptible they are to changes in market interest rates and bond yields. As yields increase, those securities with a lower yield-at-cost show a mark-to-market unrealized loss. AllMost of our unrealized losses are due to changes in market interest rates, and bond yields and/or credit ratings. The Company believesyields. We believe that it haswe have the ability to realize the full value of all of these investments upon maturity. As of June 30, 2019, we had 246 investments in an unrealized loss position. The following table summarizes the fair value and gross unrealized losses of the Company’sour investments that were in an unrealized loss position as of the date indicated below:below, the majority of which were in a continuous loss position for 12 months or more:
As of June 30, 2017 (In thousands)Fair Value 
Gross
Unrealized
Losses(1)
As of June 30, 2019 (In thousands)Fair Value 
Gross
Unrealized
Losses
Corporate debt securities$716,934
 $(1,940)$321,972
 $(580)
Sovereign securities1,999
 (8)
U.S. Government agency securities328,868
 (1,786)126,694
 (241)
U.S. Treasury securities324,555
 (1,429)142,796
 (401)
Sovereign securities42,515
 (55)
Total$1,412,872
 $(5,210)$593,461
 $(1,230)
 __________________ 
(1)
As of June 30, 2017, the amount of total gross unrealized losses related to investments that had been in a continuous loss position for 12 months or more was immaterial.

The contractual maturities of securities classified as available-for-sale, regardless of their classification on the Company’sour Consolidated Balance Sheet,Sheets, as of the date indicated below were as follows:
As of June 30, 2017 (In thousands)
Amortized
Cost
 Fair Value
As of June 30, 2019 (In thousands)
Amortized
Cost
 Fair Value
Due within one year$661,679
 $661,184
$554,039
 $553,048
Due after one year through three years1,206,508
 1,202,505
170,410
 170,343
$1,868,187
 $1,863,689
$724,449
 $723,391
Actual maturities may differ from contractual maturities because borrowers may have the right to call or prepay obligations with or without call or prepayment penalties. Realized gains on available for sale securities were immaterial for the fiscal years ended June 30, 2017, 20162019, 2018 and 2015 were $0.4 million, $0.9 million and $2.4 million, respectively.2017. Realized losses on available for sale securities were $1.4 million for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2019 and were immaterial for allthe fiscal years presented.ended June 30, 2018 and 2017.

NOTE 56 - BUSINESS COMBINATIONCOMBINATIONS

Orbotech Acquisition
On June 9, 2017, the CompanyFebruary 20, 2019, we completed the acquisition of the outstanding shares of a privately-held company that designs and manufactures optical profilers and defect inspection systems for advanced semiconductor packaging, LED and data storage industries,Orbotech for total purchase consideration of $36.9approximately $3.26 billion which was paid in part by cash of $1.90 billion, in part by KLA common stock with a fair value of $1.32 billion and the balance by the assumption of stock options and RSUs. Orbotech is a global supplier of yield-enhancing and process-enabling solutions for the manufacture of electronics products. KLA acquired Orbotech to extend and enhance its portfolio of products to address market opportunities in the printed circuit board, flat panel display, advanced packaging and semiconductor manufacturing areas.

Preliminary Purchase Price Allocation
The aggregate purchase consideration has been preliminarily allocated as follows (in thousands):
Purchase Price 
Cash for outstanding Orbotech shares(1)
$1,901,948
Fair value of KLA common stock issued for outstanding Orbotech shares(2)
1,324,657
Cash for Orbotech equity awards(3)
9,543
Fair value of KLA common stock issued to settle Orbotech equity awards(4)
6,129
Stock options and RSUs assumed(5)
13,281
Total purchase consideration3,255,558
Less: cash acquired(215,640)
Total purchase consideration, net of cash acquired$3,039,918
  
Allocation 
Accounts receivable, net$200,517
Inventories329,491
Contract assets63,181
Other current assets73,557
Property, plant and equipment102,086
Goodwill1,811,760
Intangible assets1,553,570
Other non-current assets73,179
Accounts payable(53,015)
Accrued liabilities(179,624)
Other current liabilities(6)
(69,860)
Deferred tax liabilities(7)
(777,838)
Other non-current liabilities(6)
(67,901)
Non-controlling interest(19,185)
 $3,039,918

________________
(1)Represents the total cash paid to settle 48.9 million outstanding Orbotech shares as of February 20, 2019 at $38.86 per Orbotech share.
(2)Represents the fair value of 12.2 million shares of our common stock issued to settle 48.9 million outstanding Orbotech shares. KLA issued 0.25 shares for each Orbotech share. The fair value of KLA’s common stock was $108.26 per share on the Acquisition Date.
(3)Represents primarily cash consideration for the settlement of the vested stock options and restricted stock units for which services were rendered by the employees of Orbotech prior to the closing, and a small portion for the settlement of fractional shares.
(4)Represents the fair value of share of 56,614 shares of KLA common stock issued to settle the vested Orbotech stock options. The fair value of KLA’s common stock was $108.26 per share on the Acquisition Date.
(5)Represents the fair value of the assumed stock options and RSUs to the extent those related to services provided by the employee of Orbotech prior to closing. Also refer to Note 9, “Equity, Long-Term Incentive Compensation Plans and Non-Controlling Interest” for additional information about assumed stock options and RSUs.
(6)On December 24, 2018, Orbotech, as part of its strategy to invest in the high growth area of the software business within the Printed Circuit Boards (“PCB”) industry, acquired the remaining 50% shares of Frontline, which was prior to that accounted as an equity investee, from Mentor Graphics Development Services (Israel) Ltd. Orbotech acquired all of the joint venture interests it did not previously own for $85.0 million in cash on hand and agreed to pay an additional $10.0 million in cash over four years plus a cash earn-out of not less than $5.0 million and up to $20.0 million. The earn out amounts are based on revenues from a Frontline product currently under development. As of both February 20, 2019 and June 30, 2019, the estimated fair market values of the four-year cash payment was $8.8 million and the earn-out was $7.1 million. As of both February 20, 2019 and June 30, 2019, these amounts have been included in current and non-current liabilities at $4.3 million and $11.6 million, respectively.
(7)Primarily related to tax impact on the future amortization of intangible assets acquired and inventory fair value adjustments.

During the fourth quarter of the fiscal year ended June 30, 2019, we recorded measurement period adjustments to reflect facts and circumstances in existence as of the Acquisition Date. These adjustments primarily related to the valuation of acquired intangible assets of $75.5 million, including cash paidtrade accounts receivable of $31.6$21.5 million, non-controlling interest of $17.4 million, other immaterial adjustments of $6.1 million, and related impacts on the deferred income tax liabilities of $47.5 million with resulting to corresponding increase to goodwill of $38.2 million.
KLA allocated the purchase price to tangible and identified intangible assets acquired and liabilities assumed based on the preliminary estimates of their estimated fair values, which were determined using generally accepted valuation techniques based on estimates and assumptions made by management at closing. The remaining acquisition holdback amountthe time of $5.3 million will be paid before the end of calendar year 2017.Orbotech Acquisition and are subject to change during the measurement period which is not expected to exceed one year. The primary reason fortasks that are required to be completed include discovery and the remeasurement of unknown uncertain tax positions that existed at the acquisition isdate, adjustments to expand the Company’s portfoliodeferred tax liabilities for unremitted earnings, validation of products.

The following table representssynergies expected to be derived from the acquisition of Orbotech, recoverability of certain acquired assets and reallocation of certain acquired intangible assets between jurisdictions based on the outcome of ongoing tax audits, including any related tax impacts. Any adjustments to our preliminary purchase price allocation identified during the measurement period will be recognized in the period in which the adjustments are determined and summarizes the aggregate estimated fair value of the net assets acquired on the closing date of the acquisition:
(In thousands)Preliminary Purchase Price Allocation
Intangible assets$17,660
Goodwill14,280
Assets acquired (including cash and marketable securities of $3.2 million)6,294
Liabilities assumed(1,334)
  Fair value of net assets acquired

$36,900
recorded against goodwill.

The operating results of the acquired entityOrbotech have been included in the Company’s consolidated financial statementsour Consolidated Financial Statements for the fiscal year endingended June 30, 2017. Goodwill represents2019 from the excessAcquisition Date. The goodwill was primarily attributable to the assembled workforce of Orbotech, planned growth in new markets and synergies expected to be achieved from the combined operations of KLA and Orbotech. None of the goodwill is deductible for income tax purposes. Goodwill arising from the Orbotech Acquisition has been allocated to the Specialty Semiconductor Process; and the PCB and Display reporting units during the fiscal year ended June 30, 2019. For additional details, refer to Note 7 “Goodwill and Purchased Intangible Assets.”


Intangible Assets

The estimated fair value and weighted average useful life of the Orbotech intangible assets are as follows:
(In thousands)Fair Value Weighted Average Useful Lives
Existing technology(1)
$1,008,000
 8
Customer-related assets(2)
227,000
 8
Backlog(3)
37,500
 1
Trade name(4)
91,500
 7
Off market leases (5)
2,070
 7
Total identified finite-lived intangible assets1,366,070
  
In-process research and development(6)
187,500
 N/A
Total identified intangible assets$1,553,570
  
________________
(1)Existing technology was identified from the products of Orbotech and its fair value was determined using the Relief-from-Royalty Method under the income approach, which estimates the cost savings generated by a company related to the ownership of an asset for which it would otherwise have had to pay royalties or license fees on revenues earned through the use of the asset. The discount rate used was determined at the time of measurement based on an analysis of the implied internal rate of return of the transaction, weighted average cost of capital and weighted average return on assets. The economic useful life was determined based on the technology cycle related to each developed technology, as well as the cash flows over the forecast period.
(2)Customer contracts and related relationships represent the fair value of the existing relationships with the Orbotech customers and its fair value was determined using the Multi-Period Excess Earning Method which involves isolating the net earnings attributable to the asset being measured based on present value of the incremental after-tax cash flows (excess earnings) attributable solely to the intangible asset over its remaining useful life. The economic useful life was determined based on historical customer attrition rates.
(3)Backlog primarily relates to the dollar value of purchase arrangements with customers, effective, as of a given point in time, that are based on mutually agreed terms which, in some cases, may still be subject to completion of written documentation and may be changed or cancelled by the customer, often without penalty. Orbotech’s backlog consists of these arrangements with assigned shipment dates expected, in most cases, within three to twelve months. The fair value was determined using the Multi-Period Excess Earning Method. The economic useful life is based on the time to fulfill the outstanding order backlog obligation.
(4)Trade name primarily relates to the “Orbotech” trade name. The fair value was determined by applying the Relief-From-Royalty method under the income approach. The economic useful life was determined based on the expected life of the trade name.
(5)The favorable/unfavorable components of the acquired leases were determined using the Income Approach which involves present valuing the difference in future cash flows between the contracted lease payments and the rent payable to a market participant over the lease terms. The economic useful life is based on the remaining lease term.
(6)The fair value of in-process research and development (“IPR&D”) was determined using the relief-from-royalty method under the income approach, which estimates the cost savings generated by a company related to the ownership of an asset for which it would otherwise have had to pay royalties or license fees on revenues earned through the use of the asset.

We believe the amounts of purchased intangible assets recorded above represent the fair values of and approximate the amounts a market participant would pay for, these intangible assets as of the acquisition date.

Our Consolidated Statements of Operations for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2019 included revenue of $388.9 million and a net loss of $61.6 million from Orbotech.

Other Fiscal 2019 Acquisitions
During the three months ended March 31, 2019, we acquired three privately-held companies primarily to expand our products and services offerings for an aggregate purchase price overof $118.3 million, including a post-closing working capital adjustment, and the fair value of the net tangible and identifiable intangible assets acquired. promise to pay additional consideration of up to $13.0 million contingent on the achievement of certain milestones. As of June 30, 2019, the estimated fair value of the additional consideration was $5.1 million, which is classified as a current liability on the Consolidated Balance Sheets.

During the three months ended September 30, 2018 we acquired two privately-held companies for an aggregate purchase price of $15.4 million, including the fair value of the promise to pay total additional consideration of up to $6.0 million contingent on the achievement of certain milestones. As of June 30, 2019, the estimated fair value of the additional consideration was $1.8 million, which is classified as a current liability on the Consolidated Balance Sheets.
None of these acquisitions were individually material to our Consolidated Financial Statements.
The $14.3 millionaggregate purchase price of the other fiscal 2019 acquisitions was allocated on a preliminary basis as follows:
(In thousands)Fair Value
Net tangible assets (including Cash and cash equivalents of $2.6 million)$13,214
Identifiable intangible assets75,130
Goodwill45,380
Total$133,724
The goodwill was assignedprimarily attributable to the Global Serviceassembled workforce, and Support (“GSS”), and the Other reporting units. Noneplanned growth in new markets. A portion of the goodwill recognized is deductible for income tax purposes. Our Consolidated Statements of Operations for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2019 included revenues of $9.7 million, respectively, and net losses of $3.5 million from these privately-held companies.
KLA, in the aggregate for the Orbotech and other fiscal 2019 acquisitions, incurred approximately $40.2 million of acquisition-related costs, which are primarily included within selling, general and administrative expenses in our Consolidated Statements of Operations.
Fiscal 2018 Acquisition
In the fiscal year ended June 30, 2018, we acquired a product line from Keysight Technologies, Inc., a related party, for a total purchase consideration of $12.1 million, of which $5.2 million was allocated to goodwill based on the fair value at the acquisition date. Goodwill recognized was deductible for income tax purposes. See Note 18 “Related Party Transactions” for additional details.

Supplemental Unaudited Pro Forma Information:
The following unaudited pro forma financial information summarizes the combined results of operations for KLA, Orbotech, and the three acquisitions completed in the third quarter of fiscal 2019 as if the companies were combined as of the beginning of fiscal 2018. The unaudited pro forma information includes adjustments to amortization and depreciation for intangible assets and property, plant and equipment acquired, adjustments to stock-based compensation expense, the purchase accounting effect on inventory acquired, the purchase accounting effect on deferred revenue, interest expense and amortization of debt issuance costs associated with the Senior Notes financing, and transaction costs.

The table below reflects the impact of material and nonrecurring adjustments to the unaudited pro forma results for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2019 and 2018 that are directly attributable to the acquisitions:
 Year ended June 30,
Non-recurring Adjustments (In thousands)
2019 2018
Decrease to revenue as a result of deferred revenue fair value adjustment$
 $5,349
Increase to expense as a result of inventory fair value adjustment$1,029
 $85,778
(Decrease)/increase to expense as a result of transaction costs$(64,343) $64,343
Increase to expense as a result of compensation costs$7,201
 $39,888

The unaudited pro forma information presented below is for informational purposes only and is not necessarily indicative of our consolidated results of operations of the combined business had the acquisitions actually occurred at the beginning of fiscal year 2018 or of the results of our future operations of the combined businesses.

 Pro Forma
 Year ended June 30,
(In thousands)2019 2018
Revenues$5,154,823
 $5,079,654
Net income attributable to KLA$1,288,467
 $608,542

We have not included pro forma results of operations for the acquisition of privately-held companies completed in the first quarter of fiscal 2019 herein as they were not material to us on either an individual or in aggregate. We included the results of operations of each acquisition in our Consolidated Statements of Operations from the date of each acquisition.

NOTE 67 — GOODWILL AND PURCHASED INTANGIBLE ASSETS
Goodwill

Goodwill represents the excess of the purchase price over the fair value of the net tangible and identifiable intangible assets acquired in the current and prior business combinations. The CompanyFollowing the update of the organizational structure during the fiscal year 2019, as described in Note 17, “Segment Reporting and Geographic Information”, we have four reportable segments and six reporting units. To reflect our new segment structure, goodwill arising from the Orbotech Acquisition has fourbeen allocated to the Specialty Semiconductor Process; and the PCB and Display reporting units: Wafer Inspection, Patterning, GSS, and Others.units using an acquisition accounting method. The following table presents goodwill balancescarrying value and the movements by reporting unit during the fiscal years ended June 30, 20172019 and 2016:2018(1):
(In thousands) Wafer Inspection Patterning GSS Others Total Wafer Inspection Patterning GSS  SPC Others Wafer Inspection and Patterning Specialty Semiconductor Process PCB and Display Component Inspection Total
Balance as of June 30, 2015 $332,783
(1) 
$2,480
(2) 
$
 $
 $335,263
Goodwill reallocation (51,671)
(3) 
50,775
(3) 

 896
(3) 

Foreign currency adjustment (86) 
 
 
 (86)
Balance as of June 30, 2016 281,026
 53,255
 
 896
 335,177
Balance as of June 30, 2017 $281,095
 $53,255
 $2,856
 $12,320
 $
 $
 $
 $
 $349,526
Acquired goodwill 
 
 2,856
 11,424
 14,280
 
 
 5,163
 
 
 
 
 
 5,163
Foreign currency adjustment 69
 
 
 
 69
 (90) 
 20
 79
 
 
 
 
 9
Balance as of June 30, 2017 $281,095
 $53,255
 $2,856
 $12,320
 $349,526
Balance as of June 30, 2018 281,005
 53,255
 8,039
 12,399
 
 
 
 
 354,698
Acquired goodwill 
 26,362
 17,869
 1,176
 
 821,842
 989,918
 
 1,857,167
Reallocation due to change in segments (281,005) (79,617) 
 (13,575) 360,622
 
 
 13,575
 
Foreign currency and other adjustments 
 
 
 
 (7) 
 
 
 (7)
Balance as of June 30, 2019 $
 $
 $25,908
 $
 $360,615
 $821,842
 $989,918
 $13,575
 $2,211,858
___________________________________
(1)The balance as of June 30, 2015, reflectsNo goodwill forwas assigned to the Defect InspectionOther reporting unit, under the old reporting structure which was renamed as Wafer Inspection under a new reporting structure after certain components were allocated out.
(2)The balance as of June 30, 2015, reflects goodwill for the Metrology reporting unit under the old reporting structure which was renamed as Patterning under a new reporting structure after certain components were allocated in.
(3)The Company made certain organizational changes and consolidated its product division effectiveaccordingly not disclosed in the first quarter of fiscal 2016. The reorganization resulted in the reallocation of certain goodwill balances as notedtable above.

Goodwill is net of accumulated impairment losses of $277.6 million, which were recorded prior to the fiscal year ended June 30, 2014. As of June 30, 2019, all of accumulated impairment losses were included in the Wafer Inspection and Patterning reporting unit. As of June 30, 2018 and 2017, approximately $1.0 million and $276.6 million of accumulated impairment losses were included in the Wafer Inspection reporting unit and the Patterning reporting unit, respectively.
The acquiredchange in goodwill during the fiscal year ended June 30, 2017 resulted from2019 is due to $1.81 billion related to the acquisition of certain assetsOrbotech and liabilities$45.4 million related to the acquisition of athe privately-held company. Seecompanies during the period. For additional details, refer to Note 56 “Business Combination” for additional details.Combinations”.
The CompanyWe performed a qualitative assessment of the goodwill byfor our reporting unit as of November 30, 2016units during the three months ended DecemberMarch 31, 2016 and2019. Based on this assessment we concluded that it was more likely than not that the fair value of each of the reporting units exceeded its carrying amount. As a result of our determination based on our qualitative assessment, it was not necessary to perform the quantitative goodwill impairment test at this time. In assessing the qualitative factors, the Companywe considered the impact of key factors, including changechanges in the industry and competitive environment, market capitalization, stock price, earnings multiples, budgeted-to-actual revenue performance from prior year, gross margin and cash flowflows from operating activities. As such, it was not necessary to perform the two-step quantitative goodwill impairment test at that time. In addition, there have been no significant events or circumstances affecting the valuation of goodwill subsequent to the update of the organizational structure, we performed a qualitative assessment performedof the goodwill for our reporting units, which were impacted by the organizational change, and concluded that there were no impairment indicators identified.

Based on our assessment, goodwill in the second quarterreporting units was not impaired as of the fiscal year ended June 30, 2017.2019 and 2018. The next annual assessment of goodwill by reporting unit is scheduled to be performed in the secondthird quarter of the fiscal year ending June 30, 2018.2020.
Purchased Intangible Assets
The components of purchased intangible assets as of the dates indicated below were as follows:
(In thousands) As of June 30, 2017 As of June 30, 2016 As of June 30, 2019 As of June 30, 2018
Category
Range of
Useful Lives
 
Gross
Carrying
Amount
 
Accumulated
Amortization and Impairment
 
Net
Amount
 
Gross
Carrying
Amount
 
Accumulated
Amortization and Impairment
 
Net
Amount
Range of
Useful Lives
(in years)
 
Gross
Carrying
Amount
 
Accumulated
Amortization and Impairment
 
Net
Amount
 
Gross
Carrying
Amount
 
Accumulated
Amortization and Impairment
 
Net
Amount
Existing technology4-7 years $157,259
 $140,346
 $16,913
 $141,659
 $138,160
 $3,499
4-8  $1,224,629
 $196,582
 $1,028,047
 $160,859
 $144,202
 $16,657
Trade name/Trademark7 years 20,993
 19,902
 1,091
 19,893
 19,743
 150
Trade name/trademark4-7 114,573
 25,052
 89,521
 20,993
 20,060
 933
Customer relationships7-8 years 55,680
 54,959
 721
 54,980
 54,298
 682
4-9 297,250
 66,471
 230,779
 56,680
 55,136
 1,544
Backlog<1 year 260
 22
 238
 
 
 
Backlog and other<1- 9 43,969
 19,146
 24,823
 660
 461
 199
Intangible assets subject to amortization 1,680,421
 307,251
 1,373,170
 239,192
 219,859
 19,333
In-process research and development 187,500
 
 187,500
 
 
 
Total $234,192
 $215,229
 $18,963
 $216,532
 $212,201
 $4,331
 $1,867,921
 $307,251
 $1,560,670
 $239,192
 $219,859
 $19,333
IntangiblePurchased intangible assets are reviewed for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of an asset or asset group may not be recoverable. The change in the gross carrying amounts of intangible assets is due to the acquisition of Orbotech and other privately-held companies. For additional details, refer to Note 6 “Business Combinations.”

For the fiscal years ended June 30, 2017, 2016 and 2015, amortizationAmortization expense for purchased intangible assets for the periods indicated below was $3.0 million, $7.6 million and $15.8 million, respectively. The increase in the gross carrying value resulted from the acquisition of a privately-held company. See Note 5 “Business Combination” for additional details. as follows:
 Year ended June 30,
(In thousands)2019 2018
Amortization expense- Cost of revenues$52,387
 $4,095
Amortization expense- Selling, general and administrative34,992
 535
Amortization expense- Research and development13
 
Total$87,392
 $4,630
Based on the purchased intangible assets gross carrying amount recorded as of June 30, 2017, and assuming no subsequent additions to, or impairment of,2019, the underlying assets, the remaining estimated annual amortization expense is expected to be as follows:
Fiscal year ending June 30:
Amortization
(In thousands)
Amortization
(In thousands)
2018$4,172
20192,409
20202,409
$206,293
20212,409
186,609
20222,409
185,159
2023184,060
2024182,113
Thereafter5,155
428,936
Total$18,963
$1,373,170


NOTE 78 — DEBT
The following table summarizes theour debt of the Company as of June 30, 20172019 and June 30, 2016:2018:
 As of June 30, 2017 As of June 30, 2016
 
Amount
(in thousands)
 
Effective
Interest Rate
 Amount
(in thousands)
 
Effective
Interest Rate
Fixed-rate 2.375% Senior notes due on November 1, 2017$250,000
 2.396% $250,000
 2.396%
Fixed-rate 3.375% Senior notes due on November 1, 2019250,000
 3.377% 250,000
 3.377%
Fixed-rate 4.125% Senior notes due on November 1, 2021500,000
 4.128% 500,000
 4.128%
Fixed-rate 4.650% Senior notes due on November 1, 2024(1)
1,250,000
 4.682% 1,250,000
 4.682%
Fixed-rate 5.650% Senior notes due on November 1, 2034250,000
 5.670% 250,000
 5.670%
Term loans446,250
 2.137% 576,250
 1.714%
Total debt2,946,250
   3,076,250
  
Unamortized discount(2,901)   (3,312)  
Unamortized debt issuance costs(12,892)   (15,002)  
Total debt$2,930,457
   $3,057,936
  
        
Reported as:       
Current portion of long-term debt$249,983
   $
  
Long-term debt2,680,474
   3,057,936
  
Total debt$2,930,457
   $3,057,936
  
 As of June 30, 2019 As of June 30, 2018
 
Amount
(In thousands)
 
Effective
Interest Rate
 Amount
(In thousands)
 
Effective
Interest Rate
Fixed-rate 3.375% Senior Notes due on November 1, 2019250,000
 3.377% 250,000
 3.377%
Fixed-rate 4.125% Senior Notes due on November 1, 2021500,000
 4.128% 500,000
 4.128%
Fixed-rate 4.650% Senior Notes due on November 1, 20241,250,000
 4.682% 1,250,000
 4.682%
Fixed-rate 5.650% Senior Notes due on November 1, 2034250,000
 5.670% 250,000
 5.670%
Fixed-rate 4.100% Senior Notes due on March 15, 2029800,000
 4.159% 
 %
Fixed-rate 5.000% Senior Notes due on March 15, 2049400,000
 5.047% 
 %
Total3,450,000
   2,250,000
  
Unamortized discount(8,738)   (2,523)  
Unamortized debt issuance costs(17,880)   (10,075)  
Total$3,423,382
   $2,237,402
  
        
Reported as:       
Current portion of long-term debt$249,999
   $
  
Long-term debt3,173,383
   2,237,402
  
Total$3,423,382
   $2,237,402
  
__________________ 
(1)The effective interest rate disclosed above for this series of Senior Notes excludes the impact of the treasury rate lock hedge discussed below. The effective interest rate including the impact of the treasury rate lock hedge was 4.626%.

As of June 30, 2017,2019, future principal payments for the long-term debt are summarized as follows.
Fiscal year ending June 30,
Amount
(In thousands)
2018$250,000
2019
2020696,250
2021
2022500,000
Thereafter1,500,000
Total payments$2,946,250
$250.0 million in fiscal year 2020; $500.0 million in fiscal year 2022; and $2.70 billion after fiscal year 2023.
Senior Notes:
In March 2019 and November 2014, the Companywe issued $1.20 billion and $2.50 billion, respectively (each, a “2019 Senior Notes”, a “2014 Senior Notes”, and collectively the “Senior Notes”), aggregate principal amount of senior, unsecured long-term notes (collectively referred to as “Senior Notes”). The Company issued the Senior Notes as part of the leveraged recapitalization plan under which the proceeds from the Senior Notes in conjunction with the proceeds from the term loans (described below) and cash on hand were used (x) to fund a special cash dividend of $16.50 per share, aggregating to approximately $2.76 billion, (y) to redeem $750.0 million of 2018 Senior Notes, including associated redemption premiums, accrued interest and other fees and expenses and (z) for other general corporate purposes, including repurchases of shares pursuant to the Company’s stock repurchase program. notes.
The interest rate specified for each series of the 2014 Senior Notes will be subject to adjustments from time to time if Moody’s Investor Service, Inc. (“Moody’s”) or Standard & Poor’s Ratings Services (“S&P”) or, under certain circumstances, a substitute rating agency selected by us as a replacement for Moody’s or S&P, as the case may be (a “Substitute Rating Agency”), downgrades (or subsequently upgrades) its rating assigned to the respective series of the 2014 Senior Notes such that the adjusted rating is below investment grade. If the adjusted rating of any series of the 2014 Senior Notes from Moody’s (or, if applicable, any Substitute Rating Agency) is decreased to Ba1, Ba2, Ba3 or B1 or below, the stated interest rate on such series of the 2014 Senior Notes as noted above will increase by 25 bps, 50 bps, 75 bps or 100 bps, respectively (“bps” refers to Basis Points and 1% is equal to 100 bps). If the rating of any series of the 2014 Senior Notes from S&P (or, if applicable, any Substitute Rating Agency) with respect to such series of the 2014 Senior Notes is decreased to BB+, BB, BB- or B+ or below, the stated interest rate on such series of the 2014 Senior Notes as noted above will increase by 25 bps, 50 bps, 75 bps or 100 bps, respectively. The interest rates on any series of the 2014 Senior Notes will permanently cease to be subject to any adjustment (notwithstanding any subsequent decrease in the ratings by any of Moody’s, S&P and, if applicable, any Substitute Rating Agency) if such series of the 2014 Senior Notes becomes rated “Baa1” (or its equivalent) or higher by Moody’s (or, if applicable, any Substitute Rating Agency) and “BBB+” (or its equivalent) or higher by S&P (or, if applicable, any Substitute Rating Agency), or one of those ratings if rated by only one of Moody’s, S&P and, if applicable, any Substitute Rating Agency, in each case with a stable or positive outlook. Unlike the 2014 Senior Notes, the interest rate for each series of the 2019 Senior Notes will not be subject to such adjustments. 
During the three months ended June 30, 2018, we entered into a series of forward contracts (the “2018 Rate Lock Agreements”) to lock the benchmark interest rate with notional amount of $500.0 million in aggregate. In October 2014, the Companywe entered into a series of forward contracts to lock the 10-year treasury rate (“benchmark rate”) on a portion of the 2014 Senior Notes with a notional amount of $1.00 billion in aggregate. For additional details on the forward contracts, refer to Note 16,17, “Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities.”

The original discountdiscounts on the 2019 Senior Notes and the 2014 Senior Notes amounted to $6.7 million and $4.0 million, respectively, and isare being amortized over the life of the debt. Interest is payable semi-annually on May 1 and November 1 of each year.year for the 2014 Senior Notes and semi-annually on March 15 and September 15 of each year for the 2019 Senior Notes. The debt indenture for the Senior Notes (the “Indenture”) includes covenants that limit the Company’sour ability to grant liens on itsour facilities and enter into sale and leaseback transactions, subject to certain allowances under which certain sale and leaseback transactions are not restricted. As of June 30, 2017, the Company was in compliance with all of its covenants under the Indenture associated with the Senior Notes.
In certain circumstances involving a change of control followed by a downgrade of the rating of a series of Senior Notes by at least two of Moody’s, S&P and Fitch Inc., unless the Company haswe have exercised its rightour rights to redeem the Senior Notes of such series, the Companywe will be required to make an offer to repurchase all or, at the holder’s option, any part, of each holder’s Senior Notes of that series pursuant to the offer described below (the “Change of Control Offer”). In the Change of Control Offer, the Companywe will be required to offer payment in cash equal to 101% of the aggregate principal amount of Senior Notes repurchased plus accrued and unpaid interest, if any, on the Senior Notes repurchased, up to, but not including, the date of repurchase.
Based on the trading prices of the Senior Notes on the applicable dates, the fair value of the Senior Notes as of June 30, 20172019 and June 30, 20162018 was approximately $2.67$3.70 billion and $2.68$2.33 billion, respectively. While the Senior Notes are recorded at cost, the fair value of the long-term debt was determined based on quoted prices in markets that are not active; accordingly, the long-term debt is categorized as Level 2 for purposes of the fair value measurement hierarchy.

As of June 30, 2019, we were in compliance with all of our covenants under the Indenture associated with the Senior Notes.
Credit Facility (Term Loans and Unfunded Revolving Credit Facility):Facility:
In November 2014, the Company2017, we entered into $750.0 million of five-year senior unsecured prepayable term loans and a $500.0 million unfunded revolving credit facility (collectively, the “Credit Facility”) under the Credit Agreement (the “Credit Agreement”). The interest providing for a $750.0 million five-year unsecured Revolving Credit Facility (the “Revolving Credit Facility”), which replaced our prior Credit Facility. Subject to the terms of the Credit Agreement, the Revolving Credit Facility may be increased in an amount up to $250.0 million in the aggregate. In November 2018, we entered into an Incremental Facility, Extension and Amendment Agreement (the “Amendment”), which amends the Credit Agreement to (a) extend the Maturity Date (the “Maturity Date”) from November 30, 2022 to November 30, 2023, (b) increase the total commitment by $250.0 million and (c) effect certain other amendments to the Credit Agreement as set forth in the Amendment. After giving effect to the Amendment, the total commitments under the Credit Agreement are $1.00 billion. During the third quarter of the fiscal year ended June 30, 2019, we made borrowings of $900.0 million from the Revolving Credit Facility, which were paid in full in the same quarter. As of June 30, 2019, we had no outstanding borrowings under the Revolving Credit Facility.
We may borrow, repay and reborrow funds under the Revolving Credit Facility until the Maturity Date, at which time such Revolving Credit Facility will terminate, and all outstanding loans under such facility, together with all accrued and unpaid interest, must be payable onrepaid. We may prepay outstanding borrowings under the borrowed amountsRevolving Credit Facility at any time without a prepayment penalty.
Borrowings under the Revolving Credit Facility will bear interest, at our option, at either: (i) the Alternative Base Rate (“ABR”) plus a spread, which ranges from 0 bps to 75 bps, or (ii) the London Interbank Offered Rate (“LIBOR”) plus a spread, which is currently 125ranges from 100 bps to 175 bps. The spreads under ABR and this spread isLIBOR are subject to adjustment in conjunction with the Company’s credit rating downgrades or upgrades. The spread ranges from 100 bps to 175 bps based on the Company’s then effective credit rating. The Company isWe are also obligated to pay an annual commitment fee on the daily undrawn balance of 15the Revolving Credit Facility, which ranges from 10 bps to 25 bps, subject to an adjustment in conjunction with changes to our credit rating. As of June 30, 2019,we pay an annual commitment fee of 12.5 bps on the daily undrawn balance of the revolving credit facility, which is also subject to an adjustment in conjunction with the Company’s credit rating downgrades or upgrades by Moody’s and S&P. The annual commitment fee ranges from 10 bps to 25 bps on the daily undrawn balance of the revolving credit facility, depending upon the then effective credit rating. Principal payments with respect to the term loans will be made on the last day of each calendar quarter, and any unpaid principal balance of the term loans, including accrued interest, shall be payable on November 14, 2019 (the “Maturity Date”). The Company may prepay the term loans and unfunded revolving credit facility at any time without a prepayment penalty. During the year ended June 30, 2017, the Company made term loan principal payments of $130.0 million. The remaining term loan balance of $446.3 million as of June 30, 2017 is due in the fiscal quarter ending December 31, 2019.Revolving Credit Facility.
The Revolving Credit Facility requires the Companyus to maintain an interest expense coverage ratio as described in the Credit Agreement, on a quarterly basis, covering the trailing four consecutive fiscal quarters of no less than 3.50 to 1.00. In addition, the Company iswe are required to maintain the maximum leverage ratio as described in the Credit Agreement on a quarterly basis of 3.00 to 1.00, covering the trailing four consecutive fiscal quarters for each fiscal quarter.quarter, which can be increased to 4.00 to 1.00 for a period of time in connection with a material acquisition or a series of material acquisitions. As of June 30, 2019, we elected to increase the maximum allowed leverage ratio to 4.00 to 1.00 following the Orbotech Acquisition.
The Company wasWe were in compliance with the financialall covenants under the Credit Agreement as of June 30, 2017 and had no outstanding borrowings under the unfunded revolving credit facility.2019.
Debt Redemption:
In December 2014, the Company redeemed the $750.0 million aggregate principal amount of the 2018 Senior Notes. The redemption resulted in a pre-tax net loss on extinguishment of debt of $131.7 million for the three months ended December 31, 2014 after an offset of a $1.2 million gain upon the termination of the non-designated forward contract entered by the Company in November 2014. The objective of entering into the non-designated forward contract was to lock the treasury rate used to determine the redemption amount of the 2018 Senior Notes. The notional amount of the non-designated forward contract was $750.0 million. Refer to Note 16, “Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities.”

NOTE 89 — EQUITY, AND LONG-TERM INCENTIVE COMPENSATION PLANS AND NON-CONTROLLING INTEREST
Equity Incentive Program
As of June 30, 2017, the Company had two plans under which the Company was2019, we were able to issue new equity incentive awards, such as restricted stock units (“RSUs”) and stock options, to itsour employees, consultants and members of itsour Board of Directors: theDirectors under our 2004 Equity Incentive Plan (the “2004 Plan”) and the 1998 Director Plan (the “Outside Director Plan”).
2004 Plan:
The 2004 Plan provides for the grant of options to purchase shares of the Company’s common stock, stock appreciation rights, restricted stock units, performance shares, performance units and deferred stock units to the Company’s employees, consultants and members of its Board of Directors. As of June 30, 2017, 3.1with 11.6 million shares were available for issuance under the 2004 Plan.issuance.
Any 2004 Plan awards of restricted stock units, performance shares, performance units or deferred stock units with a per share or unit purchase price lower than 100% of fair market value on the grant date are counted against the total number of shares issuable under the 2004 Plan as follows, based on the grant date of the applicable award: (a) for any such awards granted before November 6, 2013, the awards counted against the 2004 Plan share reserve as 1.8 shares for every one share subject thereto; and (b) for any such awards granted on or after November 6, 2013, the awards count against the 2004 Plan share reserve as 2.0 shares for every one share subject thereto.
In addition, the plan administrator has the ability to grant “dividend equivalent” rights in connection with awards of restricted stock units, performance shares, performance units and deferred stock units before they are fully vested. The plan administrator, at its discretion, may grant a right to receive dividends on the aforementioned awards which may be settled in cash or Companyour stock at the discretion of the plan administrator subject to meeting the vesting requirement of the underlying awards.

Assumed Equity Plans
Outside DirectorAs of the Acquisition Date, we assumed outstanding equity incentive awards under the following Orbotech equity incentive plans: (i) Equity Remuneration Plan
for Key Employees of Orbotech and its Affiliates and Subsidiaries (as Amended and Restated in 2005), (ii) 2010 Equity-Based Incentive Plan, and (iii) 2015 Equity-Based Incentive Plan (each, an “Assumed Equity Plan” and collectively the “Assumed Equity Plans”). The Outside Director Plan only permitsawards under the issuanceAssumed Equity Plans, previously issued in the form of stock options and restricted share units (“RSUs”), were generally settled as follows:
a)Each award of Orbotech’s stock options and RSUs that was outstanding and vested immediately prior to the Acquisition Date (collectively the “Vested Equity Awards”) was canceled and terminated and converted into the right to receive the purchase consideration in respect of such Vested Equity Awards as of the Acquisition Date, and in the case of stock options, less the exercise price.
b)Each award of Orbotech’s stock options and RSUs that was outstanding and unvested immediately prior to the Acquisition Date was assumed by us (each, an “Assumed Option” and “Assumed RSU”, and collectively the “Assumed Equity Awards”) and converted to stock options and RSUs exercisable for the number of shares of our common stock equal to the product of (i) the number of Orbotech shares underlying such Assumed Equity Awards as of immediately prior to the Acquisition Date multiplied by (ii) the exchange ratio defined in the Acquisition Agreement. The Assumed Equity Awards generally retain all of the rights, terms and conditions of the respective plans under which they were originally granted, including the same service-based vesting schedule, applicable thereto.
As of the Acquisition Date, the estimated fair value of the Assumed Equity Awards was $55.0 million, of which $13.3 million was recognized as goodwill and the balance of $41.7 million will be recognized as stock-based compensation expense over the remaining service period of the Assumed Equity Awards. The fair value of the Assumed Equity Awards for services rendered through the Acquisition Date was recognized as a component of the merger consideration, with the remaining fair value related to the non-employee memberspost-combination services to be recorded as stock-based compensation over the remaining vesting period.
A total of 14,558 and 518,971 shares of our common stock underly the BoardAssumed Options and RSUs and have an estimated weighted average fair value at the Acquisition Date of Directors.$53.3 and $104.5 per share, respectively. As of June 30, 2017, 1.7 million2019, there were 14,558 and 465,587 shares were available for grantof our common stock underlying the outstanding Assumed Options and RSUs, respectively, under the Outside Director Plan.Assumed Equity Plans. The weighted-average remaining contractual terms, the aggregate intrinsic values, and the weighted average exercise price for the stock options outstanding under the Assumed Equity Plans as of June 30, 2019 were 4.4 years, $0.9 million, and $54.0 per share, respectively. No Assumed Options were exercised during the year ended June 30, 2019.

Equity Incentive Plans - General Information
The following table summarizes the combined activity under the Company’sour equity incentive plans for the indicated periods:plans:
(In thousands)
Available
For Grant
Balances as of June 30, 20148,804
Restricted stock units granted(1)(3)(5)
(1,191)
Restricted stock units canceled(1)
196
Options canceled/expired/forfeited11
Plan shares expired(2)
(10)
Balances as of June 30, 2015(4)
7,810
Restricted stock units granted(1)(3)
(1,541)
Restricted stock units canceled(1)
509
Balances as of June 30, 20166,778
Restricted stock units granted(1)(3)(2)
(2,169)
Restricted stock units canceled(1)
101
Balances as of June 30, 20174,710
Restricted stock units granted(2)
(1,132)
Restricted stock units granted adjustment(4)
33
Restricted stock units canceled69
Balances as of June 30, 20183,680
Plan shares increased12,000
Restricted stock units granted(2)(3)
(2,463)
Restricted stock units granted adjustment(4)
5
Restricted stock units canceled51
Plan shares expired (1998 Director Plan)(1,660)
Balances as of June 30, 201911,613
__________________  
(1)The number of restricted stock unitsRSUs reflects the application of the award multiplier as described above (1.8x or 2.0x depending on the grant date of the applicable award).
(2)Represents the portion of shares listed as “Options canceled/expired/forfeited” above that were issued under the Company’s equity incentive plans other than the 2004 Plan and the Outside Director Plan. Because the Company is only currently authorized to issue equity awards under the 2004 Plan and the Outside Director Plan, any equity awards that are canceled, expired or forfeited under any other Company equity incentive plan do not result in additional shares being available to the Company for future grant.
(3)Includes restricted stock unitsRSUs granted to senior management with performance-based vesting criteria (in addition to service-based vesting criteria for any of such restricted stock unitsRSUs that are deemed to have been earned) (“performance-based RSUs”). As of June 30, 2017,2019, it had not yet been determined the extent to which (if at all) the performance-based vesting criteria had been satisfied. Therefore, this line item includes all such performance-based restricted stock unitsRSUs granted during the fiscal year, reported at the maximum possible number of shares that may ultimately be issuable if all applicable performance-based criteria are achieved at their maximum levels and all applicable service-based criteria are fully satisfied (84 thousand(0.7 million shares, 0.70.3 million shares and 0.6 million84 thousand shares for the fiscal years ended June 30, 2019, 2018 and 2017, 2016 and 2015, respectively, afterreflects the application of the 1.8x or 2.0x multiplier described above).
(4)(3)DuringIncludes RSUs granted to executive management during the fiscal year ended June 30, 2015,2019 with both a market condition and a service condition (“market-based RSUs”). Under the Company adjustedaward agreements, the vesting of the market-based RSUs is contingent on achieving total stockholder return (including stock price appreciation and cash dividends) objectives on a per share basis of equal to or greater than 150%, 175% and 200% multiplied by the measurement price of $116.39 during the five-year period ending March 20, 2024. The awards are split into three tranches and, to the extent that total stockholder return targets have been met, one-third of the maximum number of shares subject to outstandingavailable under these awards will vest on each of the third, fourth, and fifth anniversaries of the grant date. This line item includes all such market-based RSUs granted during the third quarter of the fiscal year ended June 30, 2019 reported at the maximum possible number of shares that may ultimately be issuable if all applicable market-based criteria are met at their maximum levels and all applicable service-based criteria are fully satisfied (0.8 million shares for the year ended June 30, 2019 reflects the application of the multiplier described above).
(4)Represents the portion of RSUs granted with performance-based vesting criteria and reported at the actual number of shares issued upon achievement of the performance vesting criteria during the year ended June 30, 2019 and 2018.
(5)No additional stock options, RSUs or other awards will be granted under the 2004 Plan by an aggregate of 4,245 shares pursuant to a proportionate and equitable adjustment for the effect of the special cash dividend, as required by the 2004 Plan. The total number of outstanding options under the 2004 Plan as well as the associated exercise prices were adjusted to ensure the aggregate intrinsic value remained the same after considering the effect of the special cash dividend. As the adjustment was required by the 2004 Plan, under the authoritative guidance, the adjustment to the outstanding awards did not result in any incremental compensation expense. Additionally, the adjustment did not have an impact on the shares available for future issuance under the 2004 Plan.Assumed Equity Plans.

The fair value of stock-based awards is measured at the grant date and is recognized as an expense over the employee’s requisite service period. For restricted stock unitsRSUs granted without “dividend equivalent” rights, fair value is calculated using the closing price of the Company’sour common stock on the grant date, adjusted to exclude the present value of dividends which are not accrued on those restricted stock units.RSUs. The fair value for restricted stock unitsRSUs granted with “dividend equivalent” rights is determined using the closing price of the Company’sour common stock on the grant date. Asdate The fair value for market-based RSUs is estimated on the grant date using a Monte Carlo simulation model with the following assumptions: expected volatilities ranging from 27.8% to 28.1%, based on a combination of June 30, 2017implied volatility from traded options on our common stock and the historical volatility of our common stock; dividend yield ranging from 2.4% to 2.5%, based on our current expectations about our anticipated dividend policy; risk-free interest rate ranging from 2.3% to 2.4%, based on the Company accrued $13.8 millionimplied yield available on U.S. Treasury zero-coupon issues with terms equal to the contractual terms of dividends payable,each tranche; and an expected term which included both a special cash dividendtakes into consideration the vesting term and quarterly cash dividends for the unvested restricted stock units outstanding ascontractual term of the

market-based award. The awards are amortized over service periods of three, four, and five years, which is the longer of the dividend record date.explicit service period or the period in which the market target is expected to be met. The fair value for purchase rights under the Company’sour Employee Stock Purchase Plan is determined using a Black-Scholes valuation model.

The following table shows pre-tax stock-based compensation expense for the indicated periods: 
Year ended June 30,Year ended June 30,
(In thousands)2017 2016 2015
2019(1)
 2018 2017
Stock-based compensation expense by:          
Costs of revenues$5,338
 $4,689
 $7,242
$10,384
 $8,062
 $5,338
Research and development8,089
 8,618
 12,259
16,225
 11,249
 8,089
Selling, general and administrative37,516
 31,743
 35,801
67,585
 43,473
 37,516
Total stock-based compensation expense$50,943
 $45,050
 $55,302
$94,194
 $62,784
 $50,943
As a result of the early adoption of the accounting standard update on accounting for share-based payment awards in the first quarter of its fiscal year ended June 30, 2017, the Company recorded excess tax benefits in the provision for income taxes of $6.6 million. See Note 1, “Description of Business and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies” for additional details. __________________ 
(1)Includes $10.9 million of stock-based compensation expense acceleration for certain equity awards for Orbotech employees.
The following table shows stock-based compensation capitalized as inventory as of the dates indicated below:
(In thousands)As of June 30,As of June 30,
2017 20162019 2018
Inventory$2,820
 $2,685
$4,819
 $4,580

Restricted Stock Units
The following table shows the applicable number of restricted stock unitsactivity and weighted-average grant date fair value for restricted stock units granted, vested and released, withheld for taxes, and forfeitedRSUs during the fiscal year ended June 30, 2017 and restricted stock units outstanding as of June 30, 2017 and 20162019: 
Restricted Stock Units
Shares
(In thousands) (1)
 
Weighted-Average
Grant Date
Fair Value
Outstanding restricted stock units as of June 30, 2016(2)
1,849
 $56.41
Shares
(In thousands) (1)
 
Weighted-Average
Grant Date
Fair Value
Outstanding restricted stock units as of June 30, 2018(2)
2,014
 $76.50
Granted(2)
1,085
 $78.83
1,232
 $99.53
Granted adjustments(3)
(2) $50.88
Assumed upon Orbotech Acquisition(4)
519
 $104.49
Vested and released(383) $52.73
(500) $73.88
Withheld for taxes(259) $52.73
(323) $73.88
Forfeited(51) $59.77
(38) $92.08
Outstanding restricted stock units as of June 30, 2017(2)
2,241
 $68.24
Outstanding restricted stock units as of June 30, 2019(2)
2,902
 $91.84
 __________________ 
(1)Share numbers reflect actual shares subject to awarded restricted stock units. As described above, underRSUs. Under the terms of the 2004 Plan, the number of shares subject to each award reflected in this number is multiplied by either 1.8x or 2.0x (depending on the grant date of the award) to calculate the impact of the award on the share reserve under the 2004 Plan.
(2)Includes restricted stock units granted to senior management with performance-based vesting criteria (in addition to service-based vesting criteria for any of such restricted stock units that are deemed to have been earned).and market-based RSUs. As of June 30, 2017,2019, it had not yet been determined the extent to which (if at all) the performance-based or market-based vesting criteria had been satisfied. Therefore, this line item includes all performance-based restricted stock units,such RSUs, reported at the maximum possible number of shares (i.e., 0.7 million shares for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2019, 0.2 million shares for fiscal year ended June 30, 2018 and 42 thousand shares for the fiscal yearsyear ended June 30, 2017 and 0.3 million shares for each of the fiscal years ended June 30, 2016 and 2015)2017) that may ultimately be issuable if all applicable performance-based and market-based criteria are achieved at their maximum and all applicable service-based criteria are fully satisfied.
(3)Represents the portion of RSUs granted with performance-based vesting criteria and reported at the actual number of shares issued upon achievement of the performance vesting criteria during the fiscal year ended June 30, 2019.
(4)Represents Assumed RSUs under the Assumed Equity Plans. Since the Assumed RSUs do not have “dividend equivalent” rights, the fair value was calculated using the closing price of our common stock on the Acquisition Date, adjusted to exclude the present value of dividends.


The restricted stock unitsRSUs granted by the Companyus generally vest (a) with respect to awards with only service-based vesting criteria, in three orover periods ranging from two to four equal installmentsyears and (b) with respect to awards with both performance-based and service-based vesting criteria, in two equal installments on the third and fourth anniversaries of the grant date, and (c) with respect to awards with both market-based and service-based vesting criteria in three equal installments on the third, fourth and fifth anniversaries of the grant date, in each case subject to the recipient remaining employed by the Companyus as of the applicable vesting date. The restricted stock unitsRSUs granted to the independent members of the boardBoard of directorsDirectors vest on the first anniversary of the date of grant. 

annually. 
The following table shows the weighted-average grant date fair value per unit for the restricted stock unitsRSUs granted, and the restricted stock units vested, and tax benefits realized by the Companyus in connection with vested and released restricted stock unitsRSUs for the indicated periods: 
(In thousands, except for weighted-average grant date fair value)Year ended June 30,Year ended June 30,
2017 2016 20152019 2018 2017
Weighted-average grant date fair value per unit$78.83
 $51.12
 $74.48
$99.53
 $95.95
 $78.83
Weighted-average fair value per unit assumed upon Orbotech Acquisition$104.49
 $
 $
Grant date fair value of vested restricted stock units$33,820
 $51,992
 $38,859
$60,749
 $49,606
 $33,820
Tax benefits realized by the Company in connection with vested and released restricted stock units$15,829
 $27,412
 $26,250
Tax benefits realized by us in connection with vested and released restricted stock units$15,053
 $16,615
 $15,829
As of June 30, 20172019, the unrecognized stock-based compensation expense balance related to restricted stock unitsRSUs was $99.4$179.7 million, excluding the impact of estimated forfeitures, and will be recognized over a weighted-average remaining contractual term and an estimated weighted-average amortization period of 1.41.6 years. The intrinsic value of outstanding restricted stock unitsRSUs as of June 30, 20172019 was $205.1$343.0 million.
Cash-Based Long-Term Incentive Compensation
The Company hasWe have adopted a cash-based long-term incentive (“Cash LTI”LTI Plan”) program for many of itsour employees as part of the Company’sour employee compensation program. Executives and non-employee members of the Board of Directors are not participating in this program. During the fiscal years ended June 30, 20172019 and 2016, the Company2018, we approved Cash LTI awards of $96.7$85.2 million and $49.3$64.9 million, respectively, under the Company’s Cash Long-Term Incentive Plan (“Cash LTI Plan”).respectively. Cash LTI awards issued to employees under the Cash LTI Plan will vest in three or four equal installments, with one-third or one-fourth of the aggregate amount of the Cash LTI award vesting on each anniversary of the grant date over a three or four-year period. In order to receive payments under a Cash LTI award, participants must remain employed by the Companyus as of the applicable award vesting date. Executives and non-employee Board members are not participating in this program. During the fiscal years ended June 30, 2019, 2018 and 2017, 2016 and 2015, the Companywe recognized $48.8$55.5 million, $44.6$52.4 million and $39.6$48.8 million, respectively, in compensation expense under the Cash LTI Plan. As of June 30, 2017,2019, the unrecognized compensation balance (excluding the impact of estimated forfeitures) related to the Cash LTI Plan was $127.7$152.2 million.
Employee Stock Purchase Plan
KLA-Tencor’sOur Employee Stock Purchase Plan (“ESPP”) provides that eligible employees may contribute up to 10%15% of their eligible earnings toward the semi-annual purchase of KLA-Tencor’sour common stock. The ESPP is qualified under Section 423 of the Internal Revenue Code. The employee’s purchase price is derived from a formula based on the closing price of the common stock on the first day of the offering period versus the closing price on the date of purchase (or, if not a trading day, on the immediately preceding trading day).
The offering period (or length of the look-back period) under the ESPP has a duration of six months, and the purchase price with respect to each offering period beginning on or after such date is, until otherwise amended, equal to 85% of the lesser of (i) the fair market value of the Company’sour common stock at the commencement of the applicable six-month offering period or (ii) the fair market value of the Company’sour common stock on the purchase date. The Company estimatesWe estimate the fair value of purchase rights under the ESPP using a Black-Scholes valuation model.
The fair value of each purchase right under the ESPP was estimated on the date of grant using the Black-Scholes option valuation model and the straight-line attribution approach with the following weighted-average assumptions: 

Year ended June 30,Year ended June 30,
2017 2016 20152019 2018 2017
Stock purchase plan:          
Expected stock price volatility23.4% 25.4% 24.5%33.2% 28.7% 23.4%
Risk-free interest rate0.5% 0.2% 0.1%2.1% 1.1% 0.5%
Dividend yield2.8% 3.3% 2.8%3.1% 2.5% 2.8%
Expected life (in years)0.50
 0.50
 0.50
0.50
 0.50
 0.50
The following table shows total cash received from employees for the issuance of shares under the ESPP, the number of shares purchased by employees through the ESPP, the tax benefits realized by the Companyus in connection with the disqualifying dispositions of shares purchased under the ESPP and the weighted-average fair value per share for the indicated periods:
(In thousands, except for weighted-average fair value per share)Year ended June 30,Year ended June 30,
2017 2016 20152019 2018 2017
Total cash received from employees for the issuance of shares under the ESPP$45,358
 $38,295
 $41,116
$64,828
 $61,452
 $45,358
Number of shares purchased by employees through the ESPP705
 735
 759
843
 733
 705
Tax benefits realized by the Company in connection with the disqualifying dispositions of shares purchased under the ESPP$1,999
 $2,194
 $1,741
Tax benefits realized by us in connection with the disqualifying dispositions of shares purchased under the ESPP$1,133
 $1,664
 $1,999
Weighted-average fair value per share based on Black-Scholes model$15.16
 $12.48
 $14.55
$21.72
 $21.95
 $15.16
The ESPP shares are replenished annually on the first day of each fiscal year by virtue of an evergreen provision. The provision allows for share replenishment equal to the lesser of 2.0 million shares or the number of shares which KLA-Tencor estimateswe estimate will be required to be issued under the ESPP during the forthcoming fiscal year. As of June 30, 2017,2019, a total of 684 thousand1.8 million shares were reserved and available for issuance under the ESPP.
Quarterly cash dividends
On May 4, 2017, the Company’s3, 2019, our Board of Directors declared a regular quarterly cash dividend of $0.54$0.75 per share on the outstanding shares of the Company’sour common stock, which was paid on June 1, 20174, 2019 to the stockholders of record as of the close of business on May 15, 2017.2019. The total amount of regular quarterly cash dividends and dividend equivalents paid by the Company during the fiscal years ended June 30, 20172019 and 20162018 was $335.4$469.4 million and $324.5$395.6 million, respectively. The amount of accrued dividends equivalents payable for regular quarterly cash dividends on unvested restricted stock unitsRSUs with dividend equivalent rights was $4.8$7.3 million and $2.7$6.7 million as of June 30, 20172019 and 2016,2018, respectively. These amounts will be paid upon vesting of the underlying restricted stock units.RSUs. Refer to Note 19, “Subsequent Events” to the Consolidated Financial Statements for additional information regarding the declaration of theour quarterly cash divideddividend announced subsequent to June 30, 2017.2019.
Special cash dividend
On November 19, 2014, the Company’sour Board of Directors declared a special cash dividend of $16.50 per share on our outstanding common stock, which was paid on December 9, 2014 to the stockholders of record as of the close of business on December 1, 2014. Additionally, in connection with the special cash dividend, the Company’s Board of Directors and the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors approved a proportionate and equitable adjustment to outstanding equity awards (restricted stock units and stock options), as required under the 2004 Plan, subject to the vesting requirements of the underlying awards. As the adjustment was required by the 2004 Plan, the adjustment to the outstanding awards did not result in any incremental compensation expense due to modification of such awards, under the authoritative guidance. Under the authoritative guidance, the dividend when declared is recognized as a reduction of retained earnings, to the extent available, with any shortfall recognized as a reduction of additional paid-in-capital. The special cash dividend reduced the retained earnings by $2.11 billion as of the special cash dividend declaration date, reducing the retained earnings amount to zero and the excess amount of the special cash dividend of $646.5 million was charged against additional paid-in capital. The declaration and payment of the special cash dividend werewas part of the Company’sour leveraged recapitalization transaction under which the special cash dividend was financed through a combination of existing cash and proceeds from the debt financing disclosed in Note 7,8, “Debt” that was completed during the three months ended December 31, 2014. TheAs of the declaration date, the total amount of the special cash dividend accrued by the Company during the three months ended December 31, 2014us was approximately $2.76 billion, substantially all of which was paid out during the three months ended December 31, 2014, except for the aggregate special cash dividend of $43.0 million that was accrued for the unvested restricted stock units. As of June 30, 2017RSUs and 2016, the Company had a total of $9.0 million and $16.9 million, respectively, of accrued dividends payable for the special cash dividend with respect to outstanding unvested restricted stock units, which will be paid when such underlying unvested restricted stock unitsRSUs vest. The CompanyDuring the second quarter of fiscal 2019, all of the special cash dividends accrued with respect to outstanding RSUs were vested and paid in full. We paid a special cash dividend with respect to vested restricted stock unitsRSUs during the fiscal years ended June 30, 20172019 and 20162018 of $8.6$2.9 million and $21.8$6.4 million respectively. Other than the special cash dividend declared during the three months ended December 31, 2014, the Companywe historically hashave not declared any special cash dividend.

Non-controlling Interest
We have consolidated the results of Orbotech LT Solar, LLC (“OLTS”) and Orbograph Ltd. (“Orbograph”), in which we own approximately 84% and 94% of the outstanding equity interest, respectively. OLTS is engaged in the research, development and marketing of products for the deposition of thin film coating of various materials on crystalline silicon photovoltaic wafers for solar energy panels through plasma-enhanced chemical vapor deposition (“PECVD”). Orbograph is engaged in the development and marketing of character recognition solutions to banks, financial and other payment processing institutions and healthcare providers.
Additionally, we have consolidated the results of PixCell, an Israeli company developing diagnostic equipment for point-of-care hematology applications of which we own approximately 52% of the outstanding equity interest and are entitled to appoint the majority of this company’s directors.
NOTE 910 — STOCK REPURCHASE PROGRAM
The Company’sOur Board of Directors has authorized a program for the Companywhich permits us to repurchase sharesup to $2.00 billion of our common stock, reflecting an increase from $1.00 billion upon the close of the Company’s common stock.Orbotech Acquisition. For additional details, refer to Note 1, “Description of Business and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies.” The intent of this program is to offset the dilution from KLA-Tencor’sour equity incentive plans, and employee stock purchase plan, the issuance of shares in the Orbotech Acquisition, as well as to return excess cash to the Company’sour stockholders. Subject to market conditions, applicable legal requirements and other factors, the repurchases were made in the open market in compliance with applicable securities laws, including the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the rules promulgated thereunder such as Rule 10b-18.10b-18 and Rule 10b5-1. This stock repurchase program has no expiration date and may be suspended at any time. As of June 30, 20172019, an aggregate of approximately 5.7$858.7 million shares werewas available for repurchase under the Company’sour stock repurchase program.
Share repurchases for the indicated periods (based on the trade date of the applicable repurchase) were as follows: 
(In thousands)Year ended June 30,Year ended June 30,
2017 2016 20152019 2018 2017
Number of shares of common stock repurchased243
 3,445
 9,255
10,207
 1,960
 243
Total cost of repurchases$25,002
 $175,743
 $608,856
$1,103,202
 $203,169
 $25,002

As of June 30, 2019, we had repurchased 68 thousand shares for $8.0 million, for which repurchases had not settled prior to June 30, 2019. The amount was recorded as a component of other current liabilities for the period presented.
NOTE 1011 — NET INCOME PER SHARE
Basic net income per share is calculated by dividing net income available to common stockholders by the weighted-average number of common shares outstanding during the period. Diluted net income per share is calculated by using the weighted-average number of common shares outstanding during the period, increased to include the number of additional shares of common stock that would have been outstanding if the shares of common stock underlying the Company’sour outstanding dilutive restricted stock units and stock options had been issued. The dilutive effect of outstanding restricted stock units and options is reflected in diluted net income per share by application of the treasury stock method.
The following table sets forth the computation of basic and diluted net income per share:share attributable to KLA:
(In thousands, except per share amounts)Year ended June 30,Year ended June 30,
2017 2016 20152019 2018 2017
Numerator:          
Net income$926,076
 $704,422
 $366,158
Net income attributable to KLA$1,175,617
 $802,265
 $926,076
Denominator:          
Weighted-average shares-basic, excluding unvested restricted stock units156,468
 155,869
 162,282
156,053
 156,346
 156,468
Effect of dilutive restricted stock units and options (1)
1,013
 910
 1,419
896
 1,032
 1,013
Weighted-average shares-diluted157,481
 156,779
 163,701
156,949
 157,378
 157,481
Basic net income per share$5.92
 $4.52
 $2.26
Diluted net income per share$5.88
 $4.49
 $2.24
Basic net income per share attributable to KLA$7.53
 $5.13
 $5.92
Diluted net income per share attributable to KLA$7.49
 $5.10
 $5.88
Anti-dilutive securities excluded from the computation of diluted net income per share46
 9
 36
227
 
 46
_________________  
(1) The Company has not had any outstanding stock options since August 2016.

NOTE 1112 — EMPLOYEE BENEFIT PLANS
KLA-Tencor hasWe have a profit sharing program for eligible employees, which distributes, on a quarterly basis, a percentage of the Company’sour pre-tax profits. In addition, the Company haswe have an employee savings plan that qualifies as a deferred salary arrangement under Section 401(k) of the Internal Revenue Code. Since April 1, 2011, the employer match amount was 50% of the first $8,000 of an eligible employee’s contribution (i.e., a maximum of $4,000) during each fiscal year.
The total expenses under the profit sharing and 401(k) programs aggregated $15.3$18.6 million, $15.316.0 million, and $14.2$15.3 million in the fiscal years ended June 30, 2017, 20162019, 2018 and 20152017, respectively. The Company hasWe have no defined benefit plans in the United States. In addition to the profit sharing plan and the United States 401(k), several of the Company’sour foreign subsidiaries have retirement plans for their full-time employees, several of which are defined benefit plans. Consistent with the requirements of local law, the Companyour deposits funds for certain of these plans with insurance companies, with third-party

trustees or into government-managed accounts and/or accrues for the unfunded portion of the obligation. The assumptions used in calculating the obligation for the foreign plans depend on the local economic environment.
The Company appliesWe apply authoritative guidance that requires an employer to recognize the funded status of each of its defined pension and post-retirement benefit plans as a net asset or liability on its balance sheets. Additionally, the authoritative guidance requires an employer to measure the funded status of each of its plans as of the date of its year-end statement of financial position. The benefit obligations and related assets under the Company’sour plans have been measured as of June 30, 20172019 and 20162018.
Summary data relating to the Company’sour foreign defined benefit pension plans, including key weighted-average assumptions used, is provided in the following tables:
Year ended June 30,Year ended June 30,
(In thousands)2017 20162019 2018
Change in projected benefit obligation:      
Projected benefit obligation as of the beginning of the fiscal year$89,923
 $75,928
$96,682
 $97,265
Service cost4,015
 3,349
4,220
 4,127
Interest cost1,117
 1,322
1,132
 1,302
Contributions by plan participants76
 163
69
 78
Actuarial loss2,991
 9,029
Actuarial (gain) loss4,187
 (8,228)
Benefit payments(1,363) (2,517)(1,755) (1,190)
Assumed benefit obligation from acquisition11,095
 
Transfer in
 2,806
Foreign currency exchange rate changes and others, net506
 2,649
(140) 522
Projected benefit obligation as of the end of the fiscal year$97,265
 $89,923
$115,490
 $96,682
      
Year ended June 30,Year ended June 30,
(In thousands)2017 20162019 2018
Change in fair value of plan assets:      
Fair value of plan assets as of the beginning of the fiscal year$18,894
 $17,038
$27,932
 $21,780
Actual return on plan assets241
 588
854
 850
Employer contributions3,330
 4,330
3,587
 3,662
Benefit and expense payments(1,363) (2,517)(1,752) (1,190)
Assumed plan assets from acquisition3,424
 
Transfer in
 2,806
Foreign currency exchange rate changes and others, net678
 (545)(490) 24
Fair value of plan assets as of the end of the fiscal year$21,780
 $18,894
$33,555
 $27,932
 

As of June 30,As of June 30,
(In thousands)2017 20162019 2018
Underfunded status$75,485
 $71,029
$81,935
 $68,750
      
As of June 30,As of June 30,
(In thousands)2017 20162019 2018
Plans with accumulated benefit obligations in excess of plan assets:      
Accumulated benefit obligation$56,967
 $53,198
$72,508
 $60,047
Projected benefit obligation$97,265
 $89,923
$115,490
 $96,682
Plan assets at fair value$21,780
 $18,894
$33,555
 $27,932
 
Year ended June 30,Year ended June 30,
2017
2016
20152019
2018
2017
Weighted-average assumptions:  
Weighted-average assumptions(1):
  
Discount rate0.8%-1.9% 0.5%-2.0% 1.3%-2.0%0.3%-1.7% 0.5%-2.3% 0.8%-1.9%
Expected rate of return on assets1.5%-2.9% 1.8%-2.5% 1.8%-2.5%1.0%-2.9% 1.3%-2.9% 1.5%-2.9%
Rate of compensation increases3.0%-5.8% 3.0%-5.8% 3.0%-5.5%1.8%-4.5% 3.0%-4.5% 3.0%-5.8%

__________________
(1)Represents the weighted-average assumptions used to determine the benefit obligation.
The assumptions for expected rate of return on assets were developed by considering the historical returns and expectations of future returns relevant to the country in which each plan is in effect and the investments applicable to the corresponding plan. The discount rate for each plan was derived by reference to appropriate benchmark yields on high quality corporate bonds, allowing for the approximate duration of both plan obligations and the relevant benchmark index.
The following table presents losses recognized in accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) before tax related to the Company’sour foreign defined benefit pension plans: 
Year ended June 30,As of June 30,
(In thousands)2017 20162019 2018
Unrecognized transition obligation$190
 $108
$242
 $251
Unrecognized prior service cost51
 113
4
 28
Unrealized net loss33,477
 31,739
25,721
 23,208
Amount of losses recognized$33,718
 $31,960
$25,967
 $23,487
Losses in accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) related to the Company’sour foreign defined benefit pension plans expected to be recognized as components of net periodic benefit cost over the fiscal year ending June 30, 20182020 are as follows: 
(In thousands)
Year ending
June 30, 2018
 
Unrecognized transition obligation$
Unrecognized prior service cost26
$3
Unrealized net loss1,436
906
Amount of losses expected to be recognized$1,462
$909
 

The components of the Company’sour net periodic cost relating to its foreign subsidiaries’ defined pension plans are as follows: 
Year ended June 30,Year ended June 30,
(In thousands)2017 2016 20152019 2018 2017
Components of net periodic pension cost:          
Service cost(1)$4,015
 $3,349
 $3,905
$4,220
 $4,127
 $4,015
Interest cost1,117
 1,322
 1,562
1,132
 1,302
 1,117
Return on plan assets(393) (406) (450)(476) (428) (393)
Amortization of transitional obligation251
 249
 259

 
 251
Amortization of prior service cost46
 46
 46
21
 26
 46
Amortization of net loss1,617
 1,132
 1,014
1,047
 1,731
 1,617
Adjustment
 
 (177)
Net periodic pension cost$6,653
 $5,692
 $6,159
$5,944
 $6,758
 $6,653
__________________
(1)Service cost is reported in cost of revenues, research and development and selling, general and administrative expenses. All other components of net periodic pension cost are reported in other expense (income), net in the Consolidated Statements of Operations.
Fair Value of Plan Assets
Fair value is the price that would be received from selling an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date. The three levels of inputs used to measure fair value of plan assets are described in Note 2,3, “Fair Value Measurements.”
The foreign plans’ investments are managed by third-party trustees consistent with the regulations or market practice of the country where the assets are invested. The Company isWe are not actively involved in the investment strategy, nor does it have control over the target allocation of these investments. These investments made up 100% of total foreign plan assets in the fiscal years ended June 30, 20172019 and 2016.2018.
The expected aggregate employer contribution for the foreign plans during the fiscal year ending June 30, 20182020 is $2.1$3.1 million.
The total benefits to be paid from the foreign pension plans are not expected to exceed $3.0$5.3 million in any year through the fiscal year ending June 30, 2027.

2029.
Foreign plan assets measured at fair value on a recurring basis consisted of the following investment categories as of June 30, 20172019 and 2016,2018, respectively:
As of June 30, 2017 (In thousands)Total 
Quoted Prices in
Active Markets
for Identical
Assets (Level 1)
 
Significant Other
Observable Inputs
(Level 2)
As of June 30, 2019 (In thousands)Total 
Quoted Prices in
Active Markets
for Identical
Assets (Level 1)
 
Significant Other
Observable Inputs
(Level 2)
Cash and cash equivalents$13,784
 $13,784
 $
$18,571
 $18,571
 $
Bonds, equity securities and other investments7,996
 
 7,996
14,984
 
 14,984
Total assets measured at fair value$21,780
 $13,784
 $7,996
$33,555
 $18,571
 $14,984
          
As of June 30, 2016 (In thousands)Total Quoted Prices in
Active Markets
for Identical
Assets (Level 1)
 Significant Other
Observable Inputs
(Level 2)

As of June 30, 2018 (In thousands)Total Quoted Prices in
Active Markets
for Identical
Assets (Level 1)
 Significant Other
Observable Inputs
(Level 2)
Cash and cash equivalents$11,950
 $11,950
 $
$15,737
 $15,737
 $
Bonds, equity securities and other investments6,944
 
 6,944
12,195
 
 12,195
Total assets measured at fair value$18,894
 $11,950
 $6,944
$27,932
 $15,737
 $12,195

 Concentration of Risk
The Company managesWe manage a variety of risks, including market, credit and liquidity risks, across itsour plan assets through itsour investment managers. The Company definesWe define a concentration of risk as an undiversified exposure to one of the above-mentioned risks that increases the exposure of the loss of plan assets unnecessarily. The Company monitorsWe monitor exposure to such risks in the foreign plans by monitoring the magnitude of the risk in each plan and diversifying the Company’sour exposure to such risks across a variety of instruments, markets and counterparties. As of June 30, 2017, the Company2019, we did not have concentrations of plan asset investment risk in any single entity, manager, counterparty, sector, industry or country.
NOTE 1213 — INCOME TAXES
The components of income before income taxes are as follows: 
Year ended June 30,Year ended June 30,
(In thousands)2017 2016 20152019 2018 2017
Domestic income before income taxes$615,906
 $417,803
 $157,251
$545,401
 $716,015
 $615,906
Foreign income before income taxes557,340
 440,389
 276,880
750,830
 739,916
 557,340
Total income before income taxes$1,173,246
 $858,192
 $434,131
$1,296,231
 $1,455,931
 $1,173,246
The provision for income taxes is comprised of the following: 
(In thousands)Year ended June 30,Year ended June 30,
2017 2016 20152019 2018 2017
Current:          
Federal$200,831
 $94,088
 $63,123
$82,460
 $504,758
 $200,831
State4,660
 6,123
 3,655
5,665
 6,422
 4,660
Foreign38,208
 37,680
 25,438
59,274
 41,414
 38,208
243,699
 137,891
 92,216
147,399
 552,594
 243,699
Deferred:          
Federal444
 15,645
 (22,390)1,636
 98,702
 444
State2,852
 3,583
 409
2,118
 1,526
 2,852
Foreign175
 (3,349) (2,262)(29,939) 844
 175
3,471
 15,879
 (24,243)(26,185) 101,072
 3,471
Provision for income taxes$247,170
 $153,770
 $67,973
$121,214
 $653,666
 $247,170

The significant components of deferred income tax assets and liabilities are as follows:
(In thousands)As of June 30,As of June 30,
2017 20162019 2018
Deferred tax assets:      
Tax credits and net operating losses$134,052
 $116,277
$208,572
 $171,701
Employee benefits accrual106,637
 109,524
65,065
 64,707
Stock-based compensation15,252
 13,607
9,432
 8,902
Inventory reserves95,200
 94,783
67,249
 62,232
Non-deductible reserves43,140
 34,484
21,633
 29,841
Depreciation and amortization3,415
 15,857

 701
Unearned revenue15,757
 14,375
16,126
 11,104
Unrealized loss on investments1,492
 956
Other26,538
 26,877
55,518
 25,602
Gross deferred tax assets439,991
 425,784
445,087
 375,746
Valuation allowance(120,708) (104,968)(166,571) (163,570)
Net deferred tax assets$319,283
 $320,816
$278,516
 $212,176
Deferred tax liabilities:      
Unremitted earnings of foreign subsidiaries not indefinitely reinvested$(13,213) $(11,571)$(243,491) $(7,146)
Deferred profit(13,657) (10,346)(15,718) (13,027)
Unrealized gain on investments(2,707) (604)
Depreciation and amortization(515,643) 
Total deferred tax liabilities(29,577) (22,521)(774,852) (20,173)
Total net deferred tax assets$289,706
 $298,295
Total net deferred tax assets (liabilities)$(496,336) $192,003

The provision for income taxes and the significant components of deferred income tax assets and liabilities for the year ended June 30, 2019 includes the tax impact of the acquisition of Orbotech.
As of June 30, 2017, the Company2019, we, excluding Orbotech, had U.S. federal, state and foreign net operating loss (“NOL”) carry-forwards of approximately $29.4$20.5 million, $49.4$28.9 million and $41.9$23.1 million, respectively. Orbotech had U.S. federal, state, and foreign NOLs of approximately $49.0 million, $27.5 million and $53.6 million, respectively. Orbotech also had capital loss carry-forwards of approximately $44.6 million. The U.S. federal NOL carry-forwards will expire at various dates beginning in 2023 through 2029.2033. The utilization of NOLs created by acquired companies is subject to annual limitations under Section 382 of the Internal Revenue Code. However, it is not expected that such annual limitation will significantly impair the realization of these NOLs. The state NOLs will begin to expire in 2018.2019. Foreign NOLs and capital loss carry-forwards will be carried forward indefinitely. State credits of $167.6$225.8 million for us including Orbotech, will also be carried overforward indefinitely. The foreign NOL carry-forwards will begin to expire in 2018.
The net deferred tax asset valuation allowance was $120.7$166.6 million and $105.0$163.6 million as of June 30, 20172019 and June 30, 2016,2018, respectively. The change was primarily due to an increase in the valuation allowance related to state credit carry-forwards generated in the fiscal year ended June 30, 2017.2019, partially offset by a decrease in the valuation allowance related to foreign NOL carry-forwards. The valuation allowance is based on the Company’sour assessment that it is more likely than not that certain deferred tax assets will not be realized in the foreseeable future. Of the valuation allowance as of June 30, 2017, $103.82019, $163.2 million relates to federal and state credit carry-forwards. The remainder of the valuation allowance relates primarily to state and foreign NOL carry-forwards.
 As of June 30, 2017, U.S. income taxes were not provided for on a cumulative total of approximately $2.602019, we intend to indefinitely reinvest $2.94 billion of cumulative undistributed earnings forheld by certain non-U.S. subsidiaries. If these undistributed earnings were repatriated to the United States, they would generate foreign tax credits to reduce the federal tax liability associated with the foreign dividend. Assuming full utilization of the foreign tax credits,U.S., the potential deferred tax liability associated with the undistributed earnings would be approximately $866.0$104.8 million.
KLA-Tencor benefitsWe benefit from tax holidays in Israel and Singapore where it manufactureswe manufacture certain of itsour products. These tax holidays are on approved investments and are scheduled to expire at varying times in the next one to fournine years. The Company wasWe are in compliance with all the terms and conditions of the tax holidays as of June 30, 2017.2019. The net impact of these tax holidays was to decrease the Company’sour tax expense by approximately $31.6 million, $39.7 million and $32.6 million$19.5 million and $20.4 million in the fiscal years ended June 30, 2017, 20162019, 2018 and 2015,2017, respectively. The benefits of the tax holidays on diluted net income per share were $0.21, $0.12$0.20, $0.25 and $0.13$0.21 for the fiscal years ended June 30, 2017, 20162019, 2018 and 2015,2017, respectively.
One of the Company’s Singapore holidays
Our Israel tax holiday is scheduled to expire in August 2018.  The Company is unsure ifJune 2020. We will adopt Israel’s Preferred Technology Enterprise (“PTE”) regime after the holiday will be extended.  The Company’s tax rate on income earned under this holiday would increase from 5% to 17% ifexpiration of the holiday is not extended.


current holiday.
The reconciliation of the United StatesU.S. federal statutory income tax rate to KLA-Tencor’sour effective income tax rate is as follows: 
Year ended June 30,Year ended June 30,
2017 2016 20152019 2018 2017
Federal statutory rate35.0 % 35.0 % 35.0 %21.0 % 28.1 % 35.0 %
State income taxes, net of federal benefit0.4 % 0.9 % 0.7 %0.5 % 0.5 % 0.4 %
Effect of foreign operations taxed at various rates(12.2)% (13.0)% (15.3)%(10.5)% (11.0)% (12.2)%
Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2017 - Transition tax and deferred tax effects(1.5)% 30.3 %  %
Global intangible low-taxed income3.5 %  %  %
Foreign derived intangible income(4.0)%  %  %
Research and development tax credit(1.1)% (1.9)% (3.7)%(1.8)% (1.4)% (1.1)%
Net change in tax reserves1.3 % (2.2)% 1.5 %1.4 % (0.4)% 1.3 %
Domestic manufacturing benefit(1.5)% (1.5)% (2.1)% % (1.1)% (1.5)%
Effect of stock-based compensation(0.2)% 0.3 % 0.8 %0.4 % (0.1)% (0.2)%
Other(0.6)% 0.3 % (1.2)%0.4 %  % (0.6)%
Effective income tax rate21.1 % 17.9 % 15.7 %9.4 % 44.9 % 21.1 %
A reconciliation of gross unrecognized tax benefits is as follows: 
Year ended June 30,Year ended June 30,
(In thousands)2017 2016 20152019 2018 2017
Unrecognized tax benefits at the beginning of the year$50,365
 $69,018
 $59,575
$63,994
 $68,439
 $50,365
Increases for tax positions from acquisitions60,753
 
 
Increases for tax positions taken in prior years6,788
 4,245
 1,245
13,001
 4,642
 6,788
Decreases for tax positions taken in prior years(246) (1,209) (7)(1,304) (6,045) (246)
Increases for tax positions taken in current year14,696
 13,636
 11,634
26,178
 16,812
 14,696
Decreases for settlements with taxing authorities
 (8,762) 

 (9,666) 
Decreases for lapsing of statutes of limitations(3,164) (26,563) (3,429)(16,196) (10,188) (3,164)
Unrecognized tax benefits at the end of the year$68,439
 $50,365
 $69,018
$146,426
 $63,994
 $68,439
 
The amount of unrecognized tax benefits that would impact the effective tax rate was $68.4$136.1 million, $50.4$57.9 million and $69.0$68.4 million as of June 30, 2017, 20162019, 2018 and 20152017, respectively. The amount of interest and penalties recognized during the years ended June 30, 2017, 2016,2019, 2018 and 20152017 was expense of $2.2$2.9 million, expense of $0.1 million, and income of $4.3$2.2 million as a result of a release of unrecognized tax benefits, and expense of $1.2 million, respectively. KLA-Tencor’sOur policy is to include interest and penalties related to unrecognized tax benefits within other expense (income), net. The amount of interest and penalties accrued as of June 30, 20172019 and 20162018 was approximately $5.9$21.8 million and $3.7$6.0 million, respectively.
The Company isWe are subject to federal income tax examinations for all years beginning from the fiscal year ended June 30, 2014. The Company is2016 and are under U.S. federal income tax examination for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2016. We are subject to state income tax examinations for all years beginning from the fiscal year ended June 30, 2013. The Company is2015. We are also subject to examinations in other major foreign jurisdictions, including Singapore and Israel, for all years beginning from the fiscalcalendar year ended December 31, 2012. We are under audit in Germany related to a wholly owned subsidiary of Orbotech for the years ended December 31, 2013 to December 31, 2015.
In May 2017, Orbotech received an assessment from the Israel Tax Authority (“ITA”) with respect to its fiscal years 2012 through 2014 (the “Assessment”, and the “Audit Period”, respectively), for an aggregate amount of tax against us, after offsetting all NOLs for tax purposes available through the end of 2014, of approximately NIS 218 million (approximately $61.0 million as of June 30, 2013.2019), which amount includes related interest and linkage differentials to the Israeli consumer price index (as of date of the Assessment). We believe our recorded unrecognized tax benefits are sufficient to cover the resolution of the Assessment.

On August 31, 2018, Orbotech filed an objection in respect of the tax assessment (the “Objection”). Orbotech is now in the process of the second stage, in which the claims raised by it in the Objection are examined by different personnel at the ITA. In addition, the ITA can examine additional items and may assess additional amounts in the second stage. The Companysecond stage must be completed within one year of when the Objection was filed.
In connection with the above, there is under income tax examinationan ongoing criminal investigation in Israel foragainst Orbotech, which became our wholly owned subsidiary as of the fiscal years ended Juneacquisition date, certain of its employees and its tax consultant. On April 11, 2018, Orbotech received a “suspect notification letter” (dated March 28, 2018) from the Tel Aviv District Attorney’s Office (Fiscal and Financial). In the letter, it was noted that the investigation file was transferred from the Assessment Investigation Officer to the District Attorney’s Office. The letter further states that the District Attorney’s Office has not yet made a decision regarding submission of an indictment against Orbotech; and that if after studying the case, a decision is made to consider prosecuting Orbotech, Orbotech will receive an additional letter, and within 30 2013 through June 30, 2015. The Company believes that adequate amounts have been reserved fordays, Orbotech may present its arguments to the District Attorney’s Office as to why it should not be indicted. To date, neither we nor Orbotech has received such an additional letter or any adjustments that may ultimately resultother correspondence or contact from any future examinationsthe District Attorney’s Office. We will continue to monitor the progress of these years.the District Attorney's Office investigation, however, cannot anticipate when the review of the case will be completed and what will be the results thereof. We intend to cooperate with the District Attorney’s Office to enable them to conclude their investigation.
It is possible that certain examinations may be concluded in the next twelve months. The Company believes it is possibleWe believe that itwe may recognize up to $15.3$14.3 million of itsour existing unrecognized tax benefits within the next 12twelve months as a result of the lapse of statutes of limitations and the resolution of examinations with various tax authorities.
NOTE 1314 — COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES
Employee Retention Commitments. In connection with the retention program adopted at the time the Company entered into the Merger Agreement with Lam Research, the Company has an estimated $20.8 million of employee-related retention commitments as of June 30, 2017 which are expected to be paid during the quarter ending December 31, 2017.
Factoring. KLA-Tencor hasWe have agreements (referred to as “factoring agreements”) with financial institutions to sell certain of itsour trade receivables and promissory notes from customers without recourse. The Company doesWe do not believe it iswe are at risk for any material losses as a result of these agreements. In addition, the Companywe periodically sellssell certain letters of credit (“LCs”), without recourse, received from customers in payment for goods and services.

The following table shows total receivables sold under factoring agreements and proceeds from sales of LCs for the indicated periods:
Year ended June 30,Year ended June 30,
(In thousands)2017 2016 20152019 2018 2017
Receivables sold under factoring agreements$152,509
 $205,790
 $137,285
$193,089
 $217,462
 $152,509
Proceeds from sales of LCs$48,780
 $21,904
 $6,920
$95,436
 $5,511
 $48,780
Factoring and LC fees for the sale of certain trade receivables were recorded in other expense (income), net and were not material for the periods presented.
Facilities.Leases. KLA-Tencor leasesWe lease certain of itsour facilities, autos and equipment under arrangements that are accounted for as operating leases. RentFacilities rent expense was $9.6$13.5 million, $8.7$10.4 million and $9.19.6 million for the fiscal years ended June 30, 20172019, 20162018 and 20152017, respectively.
The following is a schedule of expected operating lease payments: 
Fiscal year ending June 30,
Amount
(In thousands)
Amount
(In thousands)
2018$9,073
20195,768
20204,341
$30,296
20212,486
22,250
20221,358
16,217
2023 and thereafter2,489
202311,878
20247,912
2025 and thereafter15,018
Total minimum lease payments$25,515
$103,571

Purchase Commitments. KLA-Tencor maintainsWe maintain commitments to purchase inventory from itsour suppliers as well as goods, services, and servicesother assets in the ordinary course of business. The Company’sOur liability under these purchase commitments is generally restricted to a forecasted time-horizon as mutually agreed upon between the parties. This forecasted time-horizon can vary among different suppliers. The Company’sOur estimate of itsour significant purchase commitments for primarily material, services, supplies and asset purchases is approximately $432.8$631.1 million as of June 30, 20172019, which are primarily due within the next 12 months. Actual expenditures will vary based upon the volume of the transactions and length of contractual service provided. In addition, the amounts paid under these arrangements may be less in the event that the arrangements are renegotiated or canceled. Certain agreements provide for potential cancellation penalties.
Cash Long-Term Incentive Plan. As of June 30, 20172019, the Company hadwe have committed $163.1$179.3 million for future payment obligations under itsour Cash LTI Plan. The calculation of compensation expense related to the Cash LTI Plan includes estimated forfeiture rate assumptions. Cash LTI awards issued to employees under the Cash LTI Plan vest in to three or four equal installments, with one-third or one-fourth of the aggregate amount of the Cash LTI award vesting on each yearly anniversary of the grant date over a three or four-year period. In order to receive payments under a Cash LTI award, participants must remain employed by the Companyus as of the applicable award vesting date.
Warranties, Guarantees and Contingencies. KLA-Tencor provides standard warranty coverage on its systems for 40 hours per week for 12 months, providing labor and parts necessary to repair andWe maintain the systems during the warranty period. The Company accounts for the estimated warranty cost as a charge to costs of revenues when revenue is recognized. The estimated warranty cost is based on historical product performance and field expenses. Utilizing actual service records, the Company calculates the average service hours and parts expense per system and applies the actual labor and overhead rates to determine the estimated warranty charge. The Company updates these estimated charges on a regular basis. The actual product performance and/or field expense profiles may differ, and in those cases the Company adjusts its warranty accruals accordingly.

The following table provides the changes in the product warranty accrual for the indicated periods:
 Year ended June 30,
(In thousands)2017 2016
Beginning balance$34,773
 $36,413
Accruals for warranties issued during the period50,616
 39,175
Changes in liability related to pre-existing warranties(5,133) (9,146)
Settlements made during the period(34,798) (31,669)
Ending balance$45,458
 $34,773
The Company maintains guarantee arrangements available through various financial institutions for up to $25.3$50.8 million, of which $22.1$44.7 million had been issued as of June 30, 2017,2019, primarily to fund guarantees to customs authorities for value-added tax (“VAT”) and other operating requirements of the Company’sour subsidiaries in Europe, Israel and Asia.
KLA-TencorIndemnification Obligations. Subject to certain limitations, we are obligated to indemnify our current and former directors, officers and employees with respect to certain litigation matters and investigations that arise in connection with their service to us. These obligations arise under the terms of our certificate of incorporation, its bylaws, applicable contracts, and Delaware and California law. The obligation to indemnify generally means that we are required to pay or reimburse the individuals’ reasonable legal expenses and possibly damages and other liabilities incurred in connection with these matters. For example, we have paid or reimbursed legal expenses incurred in connection with the investigation of our historical stock option practices and the related litigation and government inquiries by several of our current and former directors, officers and employees. Although the maximum potential amount of future payments we could be required to make under the indemnification obligations generally described in this paragraph is theoretically unlimited, we believe the fair value of this liability, to the extent estimable, is appropriately considered within the reserve we have established for currently pending legal proceedings.
We are a party to a variety of agreements pursuant to which itwe may be obligated to indemnify the other party with respect to certain matters. Typically, these obligations arise in connection with contracts and license agreements or the sale of assets, under which the Companywe customarily agrees to hold the other party harmless against losses arising from, or provides customers with other remedies to protect against, bodily injury or damage to personal property caused by the Company’sour products, non-compliance with the Company’sour product performance specifications, infringement by the Company’sour products of third-party intellectual property rights and a breach of warranties, representations and covenants related to matters such as title to assets sold, validity of certain intellectual property rights, non-infringement of third-party rights, and certain income tax-related matters. In each of these circumstances, payment by the Companyus is typically subject to the other party making a claim to and cooperating with the Companyus pursuant to the procedures specified in the particular contract.
This usually allows the Companyus to challenge the other party’s claims or, in case of breach of intellectual property representations or covenants, to control the defense or settlement of any third-party claims brought against the other party. Further, the Company’sour obligations under these agreements may be limited in terms of amounts, activity (typically at the Company’sour option to replace or correct the products or terminate the agreement with a refund to the other party), and duration. In some instances, the Companywe may have recourse against third parties and/or insurance covering certain payments made by the Company.
Subject to certain limitations, the Company is obligated to indemnify its current and former directors, officers and employees with respect to certain litigation matters and investigations that arise in connection with their service to the Company. These obligations arise under the terms of the Company’s certificate of incorporation, its bylaws, applicable contracts, and Delaware and California law. The obligation to indemnify generally means that the Company is required to pay or reimburse the individuals’ reasonable legal expenses and possibly damages and other liabilities incurred in connection with these matters.us.
In addition, the Companywe may in limited circumstances enter into agreements that contain customer-specific commitments on pricing, tool reliability, spare parts stocking levels, response time and other commitments. Furthermore, the Companywe may give these customers limited audit or inspection rights to enable them to confirm that the Company iswe are complying with these commitments. If a customer elects to exercise its audit or inspection rights, the Companywe may be required to expend significant resources to support the audit or inspection, as well as to defend or settle any dispute with a customer that could potentially arise out of such audit or inspection. To date, the Company haswe have made no significant accruals in its consolidated financial statementsour Consolidated Financial Statements for this contingency. While the Company haswe have not in the past incurred significant expenses for resolving disputes regarding these types of commitments, the Companywe cannot make any assurance that it will not incur any such liabilities in the future.
It is not possible to predict the maximum potential amount of future payments under these or similar agreements due to the conditional nature of the Company’sour obligations and the unique facts and circumstances involved in each particular agreement. Historically, payments made by the Companyus under these agreements have not had a material effect on itsour business, financial condition, results of operations or cash flows.

NOTE 1415 — LITIGATION AND OTHER LEGAL MATTERS
Litigation Related to Terminated Merger with Lam Research.
In connection with the previously announced Merger transaction with Lam Research, four purported KLA-Tencor stockholders filed putative class actions on behalf of all KLA-Tencor stockholders. In January 2017, all four actions were dismissed with prejudice.
Other Legal Matters.
The Company isWe are named from time to time as a party to lawsuits and other types of legal proceedings and claims in the normal course of itsour business. Actions filed against the Companyus include commercial, intellectual property, customer, and labor and employment related claims, including complaints of alleged wrongful termination and potential class action lawsuits regarding alleged violations of federal and state wage and hour and other laws. In general, legal proceedings and claims, regardless of their merit, and associated internal investigations (especially those relating to intellectual property or confidential information disputes) are often expensive to prosecute, defend or conduct and may divert management’s attention and other company resources. Moreover, the results of legal proceedings are difficult to predict, and the costs incurred in litigation can be substantial, regardless of outcome. The Company believesWe believe the amounts provided in its consolidated financial statementsour Consolidated Financial Statements are adequate in light of the probable and estimated liabilities. However, because such matters are subject to many uncertainties, the ultimate outcomes are not predictable, and there can be no assurances that the actual amounts required to satisfy alleged liabilities from the matters described above will not exceed the amounts reflected in the Company’s consolidated financial statementsour Consolidated Financial Statements or will not have a material adverse effect on itsour results of operations, financial condition or cash flows.
NOTE 15 — RESTRUCTURING CHARGES
The Company has in recent years undertaken a number of cost reduction activities, including workforce reductions, in an effort to lower its ongoing expense run rate. The program in the United States is accounted for in accordance with the authoritative guidance related to compensation for non-retirement post-employment benefits, whereas the programs in the Company’s international locations are accounted for in accordance with the authoritative guidance for contingencies.
During the fourth quarter of fiscal year ended 2015, the Company implemented a plan to reduce its global employee workforce to streamline the organization and business processes in response to changing customer requirements in the industry. The goals of this reduction were to enable continued innovation, direct the Company’s resources toward its best opportunities and lower its ongoing expense run rate. The Company substantially completed its global workforce reduction during the fiscal year ended June 30, 2016. Restructuring charges for the year ended June 30, 2016 were $8.9 million, of which $3.6 million was recorded to costs of revenues, $1.6 million to research and development expense and $3.7 million to selling, general and administrative expense lines of the consolidated statements of operations. Restructuring charges for the year ended June 30, 2015 were $31.6 million, of which $8.0 million was recorded to costs of revenues, $11.1 million to research and development expense and $12.5 million to selling, general and administrative expense lines of the consolidated statements of operations.
The following table shows the activity which is primarily related to accrued severance and benefits for the fiscal years ended June 30, 2017, 2016 and 2015:
 Year ended June 30,
(In thousands)2017 2016 2015
Beginning balance$587
 $24,887
 $2,329
Restructuring costs
 8,926
 31,569
Adjustments(147) (142) 1,177
Cash payments(440) (33,084) (10,188)
Ending balance$
 $587
 $24,887


NOTE 16 — DERIVATIVE INSTRUMENTS AND HEDGING ACTIVITIES
The authoritative guidance requires companies to recognize all derivative instruments and hedging activities, including foreign currency exchange contracts and interest rate lock agreements, (collectively “derivatives”) as either assets or liabilities at fair value on the balance sheet. Changes in the fair value of derivatives that do not qualify for hedge treatment, as well as the ineffective portion of any hedges, are recognized in other expense (income), net in the consolidated statements of operations.Consolidated Balance Sheets. In accordance with the accounting guidance, the Company designateswe designate foreign currency forward exchange contracts and option contractsinterest rate lock agreements as cash flow hedges of certain forecasted foreign currency denominated sales, purchase and purchase transactions.spending transactions, and the benchmark interest rate of the corresponding debt financing, respectively.
KLA-Tencor’sOur foreign subsidiaries operate and sell KLA-Tencor’sour products in various global markets. As a result, KLA-Tencor iswe are exposed to risks relating to changes in foreign currency exchange rates. KLA-Tencor utilizesWe utilize foreign currency forward exchange contracts and option contracts to hedge against future movements in foreign exchange rates that affect certain existing and forecasted foreign currency denominated sales and purchase transactions, such as the Japanese yen, the euro, the New Taiwan dollarpound sterling and the Israeli new shekel. The CompanyWe routinely hedges itshedge our exposures to certain foreign currencies with various financial institutions in an effort to minimize the impact of certain currency exchange rate fluctuations. These currency forward exchange contracts and options, designated as cash flow hedges, generally have maturities of less than 18 months. Cash flow hedges are evaluated for effectiveness monthly, based on changes in total fair value of the derivatives. If a financial counterparty to any of the Company’sour hedging arrangements experiences financial difficulties or is otherwise unable to honor the terms of the foreign currency hedge, the Companywe may experience material losses.
For derivative instruments that are designated and qualify as cash flow hedges, the effective portion of the gains or losses on the derivative is reported as a component of accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) (“OCI”) and reclassified into earnings in the same period or periods during which the hedged transaction affects earnings. Changes in the fair value of currency forward exchange and option contracts due to changes in time value are excluded from the assessment of effectiveness. Gains and losses on the derivative representing either hedge ineffectiveness or hedge components excluded from the assessment of effectiveness are recognized in current earnings.
For derivative instruments that are not designated as accounting hedges, gains and losses are recognized in other expense (income), net. The Company uses foreign currency forward contracts to hedge certain foreign currency denominated assets or liabilities. The gains and losses on these derivatives are largely offset by the changes in the fair value of the assets or liabilities being hedged.
In October 2014, in anticipation of the issuance of the Senior Notes, the Companywe entered into a series of forward contracts (“Rate Lock Agreements”) to lock the benchmark rate on a portion of the 2014 Senior Notes. The Rate Lock Agreements had a notional amount of $1.00 billion in aggregate which matured in the second quarter of the fiscal year ended June 30, 2015. The Rate Lock Agreements were terminated on the date of pricing of the $1.25 billion of 4.650% Senior Notes due in 2024 and we recorded the fair value of $7.5 million as a gain within accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) (“OCI”) as of December 31, 2014. We recognized $0.8 million for each of the fiscal years ended June 30, 2019, 2018 and 2017, for the amortization of the gain recognized in accumulated other comprehensive income (loss), which amount reduced the interest expense. As of June 30, 2019, the unamortized portion of the fair value of the forward contracts for the rate lock agreements was $4.0 million.
During the three months ended June 30, 2018, we entered into a series of forward contracts (the “2018 Rate Lock Agreements”) to lock the benchmark interest rate prior to expected debt issuances. The objective of the 2018 Rate Lock Agreements was to hedge the risk associated with the variability in interest rates due to the changes in the benchmark rate leading up to the closing of the intended financing, on the notional amount being hedged. The 2018 Rate Lock AgreementsAgreement had a notional amount of $1.00 billion$500.0 million in aggregate, which matured and terminated in the secondthird quarter of fiscal year ended June 30, 2019 and we recorded the fair value of $13.6 million as a loss within OCI. We recognized $0.3 million amortization of the loss recognized in AOCI, which increased the interest expense for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2015. The Company designated each of the Rate Lock Agreements as a qualifying hedging instrument and accounted for as a cash flow hedge, under which the effective portion of the gain or loss on the close out of the Rate Lock Agreements was initially recognized in accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) as a reduction of total stockholders’ equity and subsequently amortized into earnings as a component of interest expense over the term of the underlying debt. The ineffective portion, if any, was recognized in earnings immediately. The Rate Lock Agreements were terminated on the date of pricing of the $1.25 billion of 4.650% Senior Notes due in 2024 and the Company recorded the fair value of $7.5 million as a gain within accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) as of December 31, 2014. For the fiscal years ended June 30, 2017, 2016 and 2015, the Company recognized $0.8 million, $0.8 million and $0.5 million, respectively, for the amortization of the gain recognized in accumulated other comprehensive income (loss), which amount reduced the interest expense.2019. As of June 30, 2017,2019, the unamortized portion of the fair value of the forward contracts for the rate lock agreements was $5.5 million. The cash proceeds of $7.5 million from the settlement of the2018 Rate Lock Agreements were includedwas $13.2 million.
For derivatives that are designated and qualify as cash flow hedges, the effective portion of the gains or losses is reported in OCI and reclassified into earnings in the same period or periods during which the hedged transaction affects earnings. Prior to adopting the new accounting guidance for hedge accounting, time value was excluded from the assessment of effectiveness for derivatives designated as cash flows from operating activitiesflow hedges. Time value was amortized on a mark-to-market basis and recognized in earnings over the consolidated statementslife of cash flowsthe derivative contract. For derivative contracts executed after adopting the new accounting guidance, the election to include time value for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2015 because theassessment of effectiveness is made on all forward contracts designated hedged item was classified as interest expensecash flow hedges. The change in the cash flows from operating activities in the consolidated statements of cash flows.
In addition, in November 2014, the Company entered into a non-designated forward contract to lock the treasury rate used to determine the redemption amount of the 2018 Senior Notes. The objective of the forward contract was to hedge the risk associated with the variability of the redemption amount due to changes in interest rates through the redemption of the existing 2018 Senior Notes. The forward contract had a notional amount of $750.0 million. The forward contract was terminated in December 2014 and the resulting fair value of $1.2 million was includedthe derivative are recorded in OCI until the hedged item is recognized in earnings. The assessment of effectiveness of options contracts designated as cash flow hedges continue to exclude time value after adopting

the new accounting guidance. The initial value of the component excluded from the assessment of effectiveness are recognized in earnings over the life of the derivative contract. Any difference between change in the lossfair value of the excluded components and the amounts recognized in earnings are recorded in OCI.
For derivatives that are not designated as cash flow hedges, gains and losses are recognized in other expense (income), net. We use foreign currency forward contracts to hedge certain foreign currency denominated assets or liabilities. The gains and losses on extinguishment of debt and other, net linethese derivative instruments are largely offset by the changes in the consolidated statements of operations, partially offsetting the loss on redemptionfair value of the debt during the three months ended December 31, 2014. The cash proceeds from the forward contract were included in the cash flows from financing activities in the consolidated statements of cash flows for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2015, partially offsetting the cash outflows for the redemption of the 2018 Senior Notes.

assets or liabilities being hedged.
Derivatives in Cash Flow Hedging Relationships: Foreign Exchange and Interest Rate Contracts
The locations and amounts of designated and non-designated derivative instruments’ gains and losses reported(losses) on derivatives in the consolidated financial statementscash flow hedging relationships recognized in OCI for the indicated periods were as follows:
(In thousands)Location in Financial StatementsYear ended June 30,
2017 2016
Derivatives Designated as Hedging Instruments    
Gains (losses) in accumulated OCI on derivatives (effective portion)Accumulated OCI$10,138
 $(9,622)
Gains (losses) reclassified from accumulated OCI into income (effective portion):Revenues$2,846
 $(2,926)
 Costs of revenues(378) (1,551)
 Interest expense754
 755
 Net gains (losses) reclassified from accumulated OCI into income (effective portion)$3,222
 $(3,722)
Net losses recognized in income on derivatives (ineffective portion and amount excluded from effectiveness testing)Other expense (income), net$(929) $(989)
Derivatives Not Designated as Hedging Instruments    
Gains (losses) recognized in incomeOther expense (income), net$7,318
 $(21,430)
 Year ended June 30,
(In thousands)2019 2018
Derivatives Designated as Hedging Instruments:   
Rate lock agreements:   
Amounts included in the assessment of effectiveness$(8,649) $
Foreign exchange contracts:   
Amounts included in the assessment of effectiveness$(358) $(1,934)
Amounts excluded from the assessment of effectiveness$(112) $
The locations and amounts of designated and non-designated derivative’s gains and losses reported in the Consolidated Statements of Operations for the indicated periods were as follows:
 Year ended June 30,
 2019 2018
(In thousands)Revenues Costs of Revenues and Operating Expense Interest Expense Other Expense (Income), Net Revenues Costs of Revenues Interest Expense Other Expense (Income), Net
Total amounts presented in the Consolidated Statements of Operations in which the effects of cash flow hedges are recorded$4,568,904
 $1,869,377
 $124,604
 $(31,462) $4,036,701
 $1,446,041
 $114,376
 $(30,482)
Gains (losses) on Derivatives Designated as Hedging Instruments:
Rate lock agreements:               
Amount of gains (losses) reclassified from accumulated OCI to earnings$
 $
 $424
 $
 $
 $
 $
 $
Amount of gains (losses) reclassified from accumulated OCI to earnings as a result that a forecasted transaction is no longer probable of occurring$
 $
 $
 $4
 $
 $
 $
 $
Foreign exchange contracts:               
Amount of gains (losses) reclassified from accumulated OCI to earnings$4,329
 $(739) $
 $
 $955
 $2,137
 $754
 
Amount excluded from the assessment of effectiveness recognized in earnings based on an amortization approach$
 $
 $
 $
 $
 $
 $
 $
Amount excluded from the assessment of effectiveness$
 $
 $
 $(323) $
 $
 $
 $(567)
Gains (losses) on Derivatives Not Designated as Hedging Instruments:
Amount of gains (losses) recognized in earnings$
 $
 $
 $(23) $
 $
 $
 $(2,311)

The U.S. dollar equivalent of all outstanding notional amounts of foreign currency hedge contracts, with maximum remaining maturities of approximately ten months and seven months as of June 30, 20172019 and 2016, respectively,2018, were as follows:
(In thousands)As of
June 30, 2017
 As of
June 30, 2016
Cash flow hedge contracts   
Purchase$19,305
 $7,591
Sell$128,672
 $91,793
Other foreign currency hedge contracts   
Purchase$165,563
 $122,275
Sell$118,504
 $115,087

(In thousands)As of
June 30, 2019
 As of
June 30, 2018
Cash flow hedge contracts- foreign currency   
Purchase$31,108
 $8,116
Sell$113,226
 $115,032
Other foreign currency hedge contracts   
Purchase$257,614
 $130,442
Sell$273,061
 $154,442
The locations and fair value amounts of the Company’s derivative instrumentsour derivatives reported in itsour Consolidated Balance Sheets as of the dates indicated below were as follows:
Asset Derivatives Liability Derivatives
Asset Derivatives Liability Derivatives
Balance Sheet 
Location
 As of
June 30, 2019
 As of
June 30, 2018
 
Balance Sheet 
Location
 As of
June 30, 2019
 As of
June 30, 2018
Balance Sheet 
Location
 As of
June 30, 2017
 As of
June 30, 2016
 
Balance Sheet 
Location
 As of
June 30, 2017
 As of
June 30, 2016
       
(In thousands)Fair Value Fair ValueFair Value Fair Value
Derivatives designated as hedging instruments                
Rate lock contractsOther current assets $
 $219
 Other current liabilities $
 $5,158
Foreign exchange contractsOther current assets $2,198
 $342
 Other current liabilities $72
 $4,736
Other current assets 397
 3,259
 Other current liabilities 2,097
 312
Total derivatives designated as hedging instruments 2,198
 342
 72
 4,736
 397
 3,478
 2,097
 5,470
Derivatives not designated as hedging instruments                
Foreign exchange contractsOther current assets 3,733
 753
 Other current liabilities 1,203
 6,911
Other current assets 2,160
 1,907
 Other current liabilities 1,237
 1,358
Total derivatives not designated as hedging instruments 3,733
 753
 1,203
 6,911
 2,160
 1,907
 1,237
 1,358
Total derivatives $5,931
 $1,095
 $1,275
 $11,647
 $2,557
 $5,385
 $3,334
 $6,828
The following table provides the balances and changes in accumulated OCI, before taxes, related to derivative instrumentsderivatives for the indicated periods:periods were as follows:
 Year ended June 30, Year ended June 30,
(In thousands) 2017 2016 2019 2018
Beginning balance $1,210
 $7,110
 $2,346
 $8,126
Amount reclassified to income (3,222) 3,722
Amount reclassified to earnings (4,018) (3,846)
Net change in unrealized gains or losses 10,138
 (9,622) (9,119) (1,934)
Ending balance $8,126
 $1,210
 $(10,791) $2,346

Offsetting of Derivative Assets and Liabilities
KLA-Tencor presentsWe present derivatives at gross fair values in the Consolidated Balance Sheets. The Company hasWe have entered into arrangements with each of itsour counterparties, which reduce credit risk by permitting net settlement of transactions with the same counterparty under certain conditions. As of June 30, 2017 and 2016,The information related to the offsetting arrangements for the periods indicated was as follows (in thousands):
As of June 30, 2017     Gross Amounts of Derivatives Not Offset in the Consolidated Balance Sheets  
Description Gross Amounts of Derivatives Gross Amounts of Derivatives Offset in the Consolidated Balance Sheets Net Amount of Derivatives Presented in the Consolidated Balance Sheets Financial Instruments Cash Collateral Received Net Amount
Derivatives - Assets $5,931
 $
 $5,931
 $(1,275) $
 $4,656
Derivatives - Liabilities $(1,275) $
 $(1,275) $1,275
 $
 $
As of June 30, 2019     Gross Amounts of Derivatives Not Offset in the Consolidated Balance Sheets  
Description Gross Amounts of Derivatives Gross Amounts of Derivatives Offset in the Consolidated Balance Sheets Net Amount of Derivatives Presented in the Consolidated Balance Sheets Financial Instruments Cash Collateral Received Net Amount
Derivatives - assets $2,557
 $
 $2,557
 $(1,397) $
 $1,160
Derivatives - liabilities $(3,334) $
 $(3,334) $1,397
 $
 $(1,937)
As of June 30, 2016     Gross Amounts of Derivatives Not Offset in the Consolidated Balance Sheets  
Description Gross Amounts of Derivatives Gross Amounts of Derivatives Offset in the Consolidated Balance Sheets Net Amount of Derivatives Presented in the Consolidated Balance Sheets Financial Instruments Cash Collateral Received Net Amount
Derivatives - Assets $1,095
 $
 $1,095
 $(843) $
 $252
Derivatives - Liabilities $(11,647) $
 $(11,647) $843
 $
 $(10,804)
As of June 30, 2018     Gross Amounts of Derivatives Not Offset in the Consolidated Balance Sheets  
Description Gross Amounts of Derivatives Gross Amounts of Derivatives Offset in the Consolidated Balance Sheets Net Amount of Derivatives Presented in the Consolidated Balance Sheets Financial Instruments Cash Collateral Received Net Amount
Derivatives - assets $5,385
 $
 $5,385
 $(1,888) $
 $3,497
Derivatives - liabilities $(6,828) $
 $(6,828) $1,888
 $
 $(4,940)

NOTE 17 — SEGMENT REPORTING AND GEOGRAPHIC INFORMATION
KLA-Tencor reports one reportable segment in accordance with the provisions of the authoritative guidanceASC 280, Segment Reporting, establishes standards for segment reporting.reporting information about operating segments. Operating segments are defined as components of an enterprise about which separate financial information is evaluated regularly by the chief operating decision maker (“CODM”) in deciding how to allocate resources and in assessing performance. KLA-Tencor’s chief operating decision makerOur CODM is itsour Chief Executive Officer.
As a result of the Orbotech Acquisition, we updated our organizational structure resulting in four reportable segments: Semiconductor Process Control; Specialty Semiconductor Process; PCB, Display and Component Inspection; and Other. The Company is engaged primarily in designing, manufacturingreportable segments are determined based on several factors including, but not limited to, customer base, homogeneity of products, technology, delivery channels and marketing process controlsimilar economic characteristics.
Semiconductor Process Control.
The Semiconductor Process Control (“SPC”) segment offers comprehensive portfolio of inspection, metrology and yield management solutions for the semiconductordata analytics products, and related nanoelectronics industries.
All operating segments have been aggregated dueservice, which helps integrated circuit manufacturers achieve target yield throughout the entire semiconductor fabrication process-from research and development (“R&D”) to their inter-dependencies, commonality of long-term economic characteristics,final volume production. Our differentiated products and services theare designed to provide comprehensive solutions that help our customers accelerate development and production processes, class of customerramp cycles, achieve higher and distribution processes. The Company’s service products are an extension of the system product portfoliomore stable semiconductor die yields and provide customers with spare parts and fab management services (including system preventive maintenance and optimization services) to improve yield, increase production uptime and throughput, and lower the cost of ownership. Since the Company operates in onetheir overall profitability. This reportable segment all financialis comprised of two operating segments.
Specialty Semiconductor Process
The Specialty Semiconductor Manufacturing segment information requireddevelops and sells advanced vacuum deposition and etching process tools, which are used by a broad range of specialty semiconductor customers, including manufacturers of microelectromechanical systems (“MEMS”), radio frequency (“RF”) communication chips, and power semiconductors for automotive and industrial applications. This reportable segment is comprised of one operating segment.
PCB, Display and Component Inspection
The PCB, Display and Component Inspection segment enable electronic device manufacturers to inspect, test and measure printed circuit boards (“PCBs”), flat panel displays (“FPDs”) and ICs to verify their quality, pattern the authoritative guidance can be founddesired electronic circuitry on the relevant substrate and perform three-dimensional shaping of metalized circuits on multiple surfaces. This segment also engages in the consolidateddevelopment and marketing of character recognition solutions to banks, financial statements.and other payment processing institutions and healthcare providers. This reportable segment is comprised of two operating segments.

Other
We engage in the research, development and marketing of products for the deposition of thin film coating of various materials on crystalline silicon photovoltaic wafers for solar energy panels. This reportable segment is comprised of one operating segment.
The Company’sCODM assesses the performance of each operating segment and allocates resources to those segments based on total revenue and segment gross margin and does not evaluate the segments using discrete asset information. Segment gross margin excludes corporate allocation and effects of foreign exchange rates, amortization of intangible assets, amortization of inventory fair value adjustments, and transaction costs associated with our acquisitions related to costs of revenues.
The following is a summary of results for each of our four reportable segments for the indicated periods:
 Year ended June 30,
(In thousands)2019 2018 2017
Semiconductor Process Control:     
Revenue$4,080,822
 $3,944,015
 $3,408,876
Segment gross margin$2,590,434
 $2,554,223
 $2,160,747
Specialty Semiconductor Process:     
Revenue$151,164
 $
 $
Segment gross margin$78,800
 $
 $
PCB, Display and Component Inspection:     
Revenue$332,810
 $92,516
 $71,557
Segment gross margin$155,765
 $38,428
 $30,914
Other:     
Revenue$4,676
 $
 $
Segment gross margin$1,102
 $
 $
Totals:     
Revenue$4,569,472
 $4,036,531
 $3,480,433
Segment gross margin$2,826,101
 $2,592,651
 $2,191,661
The following table reconciles total reportable segment revenue to total revenue for the indicated periods:
 Year ended June 30,
(In thousands)2019 2018 2017
Total revenue for reportable segments$4,569,472
 $4,036,531
 $3,480,433
Corporate allocation and effects of foreign exchange rates(568) 170
 (419)
Total revenue$4,568,904
 $4,036,701
 $3,480,014
The following table reconciles total segment gross margin to total income before income taxes for the indicated periods:
 Year ended June 30,
(In thousands)2019 2018 2017
Total segment gross margin$2,826,101
 $2,592,651
 $2,191,661
Merger and acquisition-related charges, corporate allocation, and effects of foreign exchange rates(1)
126,574
 1,991
 (2,138)
Research and development711,030
 608,531
 526,688
Selling, general and administrative599,124
 442,304
 388,211
Interest expense124,604
 114,376
 122,476
Other expense (income), net(31,462) (30,482) (16,822)
Income before income taxes$1,296,231
 $1,455,931
 $1,173,246
__________________

(1)Acquisition-related charges primarily include amortization of intangible assets, amortization of inventory fair value adjustments, and other acquisition-related costs classified or presented as part of costs of revenues. Merger-related charges are associated with the merger agreement terminated during the fiscal year ended June 30, 2017 between KLA and Lam Research Corporation (“Lam”) primarily includes employee retention-related expenses associated with costs of revenues.
Our significant operations outside the United States include manufacturing facilities in China, Germany, Israel and Singapore and sales, marketing and service offices in Japan, the rest of the Asia Pacific region and Europe. For geographical revenue reporting, revenues are attributed to the geographic location in which the customer is located. Long-lived assets consist of land, property and equipment, net and are attributed to the geographic region in which they are located.
The following is a summary of revenues by geographic region, based on ship-to location, for the indicated periods (as a percentage of total revenues):periods:
(Dollar amounts in thousands)Year ended June 30,Year ended June 30,
2017 2016 20152019 2018 2017
Revenues:                      
China$1,215,807
 27% $643,033
 16% $412,098
 12%
Taiwan$1,104,307
 32% $894,557
 30% $691,482
 25%1,105,726
 24% 636,363
 16% 1,104,307
 32%
North America596,452
 13% 494,330
 12% 523,024
 14%
Korea688,094
 20% 367,905
 12% 405,320
 14%584,091
 13% 1,178,601
 29% 688,094
 20%
North America523,024
 14% 521,335
 18% 815,914
 29%
China412,098
 12% 430,074
 14% 162,669
 6%
Japan351,202
 10% 444,216
 15% 426,963
 15%581,529
 13% 638,358
 16% 351,202
 10%
Europe & Israel263,789
 8% 167,936
 6% 194,670
 7%
Europe and Israel305,924
 7% 300,883
 7% 263,789
 8%
Rest of Asia137,500
 4% 158,470
 5% 117,031
 4%179,375
 3% 145,133
 4% 137,500
 4%
Total$3,480,014
 100% $2,984,493
 100% $2,814,049
 100%$4,568,904
 100% $4,036,701
 100% $3,480,014
 100%
The following is a summary of revenues by major products for the indicated periods (as a percentage of total revenues):periods:
(Dollar amounts in thousands)Year ended June 30,Year ended June 30,
2017 2016 20152019 2018 2017
Revenues:                      
Wafer Inspection$1,601,190
 46% $1,293,922
 43% $1,224,858
 44%$1,657,753
 36% $1,731,809
 43% $1,600,889
 46%
Patterning917,178
 26% 772,045
 26% 736,959
 26%1,134,409
 25% 1,116,022
 28% 917,178
 26%
Global Service and Support (1)
897,794
 26% 852,151
 29% 790,971
 28%
Specialty Semiconductor Process129,854
 3% 
 % 
 %
PCB, Display and Component Inspection238,275
 5% 85,836
 2% 66,399
 2%
Services1,176,661
 26% 876,030
 22% 776,080
 22%
Other63,852
 2% 66,375
 2% 61,261
 2%231,952
 5% 227,004
 5% 119,468
 4%
Total$3,480,014
 100% $2,984,493
 100% $2,814,049
 100%$4,568,904
 100% $4,036,701
 100% $3,480,014
 100%
__________________ 
(1) The Global ServiceWafer Inspection, and Support revenuesPatterning products are offered in Semiconductor Process Control segment. Services are offered in multiple segments. Other includes service revenues as presented inprimarily refurbished systems, remanufactured legacy systems, and enhancements and upgrades for previous-generation products which are part of Semiconductor Process Control segment.
In the consolidated statementsfiscal year ended June 30, 2019, one customer accounted for approximately 15% of operations as well as certain product revenues, primarily revenues fromtotal revenues. In the Company’s K-T Pro business.
fiscal year ended June 30, 2018, one customer accounted for approximately 21% of total revenues. In the fiscal year ended June 30, 2017, two customers accounted for approximately 23% and 16% of total revenues. In the fiscal year ended June 30, 2016, two customers accounted for approximately 18% and 10% of total revenues. In the fiscal year ended June 30, 2015, three customers accounted for approximately 15%, 12% and 11% of total revenues.

Long-lived assets by geographic region as of the dates indicated below were as follows:
As of June 30,As of June 30,
(In thousands)2017 20162019 2018
Long-lived assets:      
United States$191,096
 $182,597
$253,255
 $187,352
Singapore39,118
 41,658
Israel30,182
 30,844
66,082
 26,980
Europe13,300
 13,347
62,027
 12,924
Singapore49,523
 47,009
Rest of Asia10,279
 9,568
17,912
 12,041
Total$283,975
 $278,014
$448,799
 $286,306
NOTE 18 — RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS
During the fiscal years ended June 30, 20172019, 20162018 and 20152017, the Companywe purchased from, or sold to, several entities, where one or more of our executive officers of the Company or members of the Company’sour Board of Directors, or their immediate family members were, during the periods presented, an executive officer or a board member or a board member of a subsidiary, including Broadcom Limited, CiscoCitrix Systems, Inc., Citrix Systems,Integrated Device Technology, Inc., Juniper Networks, Inc., Keysight Technologies, Inc., MetLife andInsurance K.K., NetApp, Inc., and Proofpoint, Inc.
The following table provides the transactions with these parties for the indicated periods (for the portion of such period that they were considered related):
 Year ended June 30,
(In thousands)2019 2018 2017
Total revenues$2,402
 $474
 $16
Total purchases(1)
$2,881
 $14,723
 $1,048
________________ 
 Year ended June 30,
(In thousands)2017 2016 2015
Total revenues$16
 $8
 $1,856
Total purchases$1,048
 $983
 $1,098
(1)During the fourth quarter of the fiscal year ended June 30, 2018, we acquired a product line from Keysight Technologies, Inc. (“Keysight”) and entered into a transition services agreement pursuant to which Keysight provides certain manufacturing services to us. For additional details refer to Note 6, “Business Combinations”. We recorded the manufacturing services fees under the transition services agreement with Keysight within cost of revenues, which was immaterial for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2019 and 2018.
 The Company’sOur receivable and payable balances from these parties were immaterial atas of June 30, 20172019 and 2016. Management believes that such transactions are at arm’s length and on similar terms as would have been obtained from unaffiliated third parties.June 30, 2018.
NOTE 19 — SUBSEQUENT EVENTS
On August 3, 2017, the Company1, 2019, we announced that itsour Board of Directors had declared a quarterly cash dividend of $0.59$0.75 per share to be paid on September 1, 20173, 2019 to stockholders of record as of the close of business on August 15, 2017.2019.
NOTE 20 — QUARTERLY CONSOLIDATED RESULTS OF OPERATIONS (UNAUDITED)
The following is a summary of the Company’sour quarterly consolidated results of operations (unaudited) for the fiscal years ended June 30, 20172019 and 20162018.
(In thousands, except per share data)
First quarter
ended
September 30, 2016
 
Second quarter
ended
December 31, 2016
 
Third quarter
ended
March 31, 2017
 
Fourth quarter
ended
June 30, 2017
First Quarter Ended
September 30, 2018
 
Second Quarter Ended
December 31, 2018
 
Third Quarter Ended
March 31, 2019
 
Fourth Quarter Ended
June 30, 2019
Total revenues(2)$750,673
 $876,885
 $913,809
 $938,647
$1,093,260
 $1,119,898
 $1,097,311
 $1,258,435
Gross margin$472,837
 $558,378
 $570,535
 $590,717
$711,873
 $711,638
 $610,366
 $665,650
Net income$178,101
 $238,251
 $253,562
 $256,162
Net income per share:       
Net income attributable to KLA$395,944
 $369,100
 $192,728
 $217,845
Net income attributable to KLA per share:       
Basic(1)(4)
$1.14
 $1.52
 $1.62
 $1.64
$2.55
 $2.43
 $1.23
 $1.36
Diluted(1)(4)
$1.13
 $1.52
 $1.61
 $1.62
$2.54
 $2.42
 $1.23
 $1.35

(In thousands, except per share data)
First quarter
ended
September 30, 2015
 
Second quarter
ended
December 31, 2015
 
Third quarter
ended
March 31, 2016
 
Fourth quarter
ended
June 30, 2016
First Quarter Ended
September 30, 2017
 
Second Quarter Ended
December 31, 2017
 
Third Quarter Ended
March 31, 2018
 
Fourth Quarter Ended
June 30, 2018
Total revenues$642,644
 $710,245
 $712,433
 $919,171
$969,581
 $975,822
 $1,021,294
 $1,070,004
Gross margin$372,400
 $429,265
 $437,834
 $581,603
$616,464
 $628,820
 $652,938
 $692,438
Net income$104,897
 $152,207
 $175,777
 $271,541
Net income per share:       
Net income (loss) attributable to KLA(3)
$280,936
 $(134,319) $306,881
 $348,767
Net income (loss) attributable to KLA per share:       
Basic(1)(4)
$0.67
 $0.98
 $1.13
 $1.74
$1.79
 $(0.86) $1.96
 $2.24
Diluted(1)(4)
$0.66
 $0.98
 $1.12
 $1.73
$1.78
 $(0.86) $1.95
 $2.22
 __________________ 
(1)On July 1, 2018, we adopted ASC 606 using the modified retrospective transition approach. Results for reporting periods beginning after June 30, 2018 are presented under ASC 606, while prior period amounts are not adjusted and continue to be reported in accordance with the previous revenue guidance in ASC 605.
(2)On February 20, 2019, we completed the acquisition of Orbotech for total consideration of approximately $3.26 billion. The operating results of Orbotech have been included in our Consolidated financial statements for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2019 from the Acquisition Date. For additional details, refer to Note 6 “Business Combinations” to our Consolidated Financial Statements.
(3)We had a net loss of $134.3 million in the second quarter of the fiscal year ended June 30, 2018, primarily as a result of the income tax effects from the enacted tax reform legislation through the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act, which was signed into law on December 22, 2017.
(4)Basic and diluted net income (loss) per share are computed independently for each of the quarters presented based on the weighted-average basic and fully diluted shares outstanding for each quarter. Therefore, the sum of quarterly basic and diluted net income (loss) per share information may not equal annual basic and diluted net income (loss) per share.


REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

To the Board of Directors and Stockholders of KLA-TencorKLA Corporation:
In our opinion,Opinions on the Financial Statements and Internal Control over Financial Reporting
We have audited the accompanying consolidated financial statements listed in the index appearing under Item 15(a)(1) present fairly, in all material respects, the financial positionbalance sheets of KLA Corporation (formerly known as KLA-Tencor CorporationCorporation) and its subsidiaries at (the “Company”) as of June 30, 20172019 and June 30, 2016,2018, and the resultsrelated consolidated statements of their operations, comprehensive income, stockholders’ equity and their cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended June 30, 20172019, including the related notes and financial statement schedule listed in the index appearing under Item 15(a)(2) (collectively referred to as the “consolidated financial statements”). We also have audited the Company's internal control over financial reporting as of June 30, 2019, based on criteria established in Internal Control - Integrated Framework (2013) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO).
In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of the Company as of June 30, 2019 and 2018, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended June 30, 2019 in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. In addition, in our opinion, the financial statement schedule listed in the index appearing under Item 15(a)(2) presents fairly, in all material respects, the information set forth therein when read in conjunction with the related consolidated financial statements. Also, in our opinion, the Company maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as of June 30, 20172019, based on criteria established in Internal Control—Integrated Framework (2013) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations ofCOSO.
Change in Accounting Principle
As discussed in Notes 1 and 2 to the Treadway Commission (COSO). consolidated financial statements, the Company changed the manner in which it accounts for revenues from contracts with customers in 2019.
Basis for Opinions
The Company’s management is responsible for these consolidated financial statements, and financial statement schedule, for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting, and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, included in Management’s Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting appearing under Item 9A. Our responsibility is to express opinions on thesethe Company’s consolidated financial statements on the financial statement schedule, and on the Company’s internal control over financial reporting based on our integrated audits. We are a public accounting firm registered with the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (PCAOB) and are required to be independent with respect to the Company in accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.
We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States).PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audits to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the consolidated financial statements are free of material misstatement, whether due to error or fraud, and whether effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material respects.
Our audits of the consolidated financial statements included performing procedures to assess the risks of material misstatement of the consolidated financial statements, whether due to error or fraud, and performing procedures that respond to those risks. Such procedures included examining, on a test basis, evidence supportingregarding the amounts and disclosures in the consolidated financial statements, assessingstatements. Our audits also included evaluating the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, andas well as evaluating the overall presentation of the consolidated financial statement presentation.statements. Our audit of internal control over financial reporting included obtaining an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, assessing the risk that a material weakness exists, and testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control based on the assessed risk. Our audits also included performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinions.
As described in Management’s Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting, management has excluded Orbotech, Ltd. from its assessment of internal control over financial reporting as of June 30, 2019 because it was acquired by the Company in a purchase business combination during 2019. We have also excluded Orbotech, Ltd. from our audit of internal control over financial reporting. Orbotech, Ltd. is a wholly-owned subsidiary whose total assets and total revenues excluded from management’s assessment and our audit of internal control over financial reporting were $917.6 million and $388.9 million, respectively, of the related consolidated financial statement amounts as of and for the year ended June 30, 2019.


Definition and Limitations of Internal Control over Financial Reporting
A company’s internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A company’s internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (i) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (ii) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company; and (iii) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the company’s assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.
Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.
Critical Audit Matters
The critical audit matters communicated below are matters arising from the current period audit of the consolidated financial statements that were communicated or required to be communicated to the audit committee and that (i) relate to accounts or disclosures that are material to the consolidated financial statements and (ii) involved our especially challenging, subjective, or complex judgments. The communication of critical audit matters does not alter in any way our opinion on the consolidated financial statements, taken as a whole, and we are not, by communicating the critical audit matters below, providing separate opinions on the critical audit matters or on the accounts or disclosures to which they relate.
Acquisition of Orbotech, Ltd. - Valuation of Intangible Assets
As described in Notes 1 and 6 to the consolidated financial statements, the Company completed the acquisition of Orbotech, Ltd. (“Orbotech”) for consideration of approximately $3.26 billion in 2019, which resulted in approximately $1.55 billion of intangible assets being recorded. Management applied significant judgment in estimating the fair value of the intangible assets acquired, which involved the use of significant estimates and assumptions with respect to the revenue growth rates, technology migration curves, discount rates, royalty rates and customer attrition rates.
The principal considerations for our determination that performing procedures relating to the valuation of the intangible assets acquired in the acquisition of Orbotech is a critical audit matter are there was a high degree of auditor judgment and subjectivity in applying procedures relating to the fair value measurement of intangible assets acquired due to the significant amount of judgment by management when developing the estimate. Significant audit effort was required in performing procedures and evaluating the significant assumptions relating to the estimate, including the revenue growth rates and the technology migration curves; and the audit effort involved the use of professionals with specialized skill and knowledge to assist in evaluating the audit evidence obtained from these procedures.
Addressing the matter involved performing procedures and evaluating audit evidence in connection with forming our overall opinion on the consolidated financial statements. These procedures included testing the effectiveness of controls relating to the acquisition accounting, including controls over management’s valuation of intangible assets and controls over development of the assumptions related to the valuation of the intangible assets. These procedures also included, among others, reading the purchase agreement, and testing management’s process for estimating the fair value of intangible assets. Testing management’s process included evaluating the appropriateness of the valuation methods and the reasonableness of significant assumptions, including the revenue growth rates and the technology migration curves for the intangible assets, and using professionals with specialized skill and knowledge to assist with the evaluation. Evaluating the reasonableness of the revenue growth rates involved considering the past performance of the acquired business as well as economic and industry forecasts. The technology migration curves were evaluated by considering the revenue attribution between existing technology and in-process research and development based on the assessment of the separation of forecasted future revenue between developed products and new generation products together with the technology carryover rate.

Uncertain Tax Positions related to the Orbotech Acquisition
As described in Note 13 to the consolidated financial statements, the Company has recorded liabilities for gross uncertain tax positions of approximately $60.8 million at June 30, 2019 in connection with acquisitions completed by the Company. The majority of the uncertain tax positions were related to the Orbotech acquisition. The uncertain tax positions for the Orbotech acquisition relate to multiple jurisdictions, including Israel, which as further discussed in Note 13 is comprised principally of a liability for an uncertain tax position arising from the assessment Orbotech received from the Israel Tax Authority (“ITA”) with respect to its fiscal years 2012 through 2014. The calculation of the Company’s tax liabilities including liabilities associated with the Orbotech acquisition, involves dealing with uncertainties in the application of complex tax regulations. The evaluation is based on factors including, but not limited to, changes in facts or circumstances, changes in tax law, effectively settled issues under audit and new audit activity.

The principal considerations for our determination that performing procedures relating to the uncertain tax positions related to the Orbotech acquisition is a critical audit matter are there was significant judgment by management when evaluating uncertain tax positions, including a high degree of estimation uncertainty relative to the application of complex tax regulations and evaluation of factors including changes in facts or circumstances, changes in tax law, effectively settled issues under audit and new audit activity. This in turn led to significant auditor judgment and effort in performing procedures to evaluate the timely identification and accurate measurement of uncertain tax positions. Also, the evaluation of audit evidence available to support the tax liabilities for uncertain tax positions is complex and required significant auditor judgment as the nature of the evidence is often highly subjective, and the audit effort involved the use of professionals with specialized skill and knowledge to assist in evaluating the audit evidence obtained from these procedures.

Addressing the matter involved performing procedures and evaluating audit evidence in connection with forming our overall opinion on the consolidated financial statements. These procedures included testing the effectiveness of controls relating to the identification and recognition of the liability for uncertain tax positions, and controls addressing completeness of the uncertain tax positions, as well as controls over measurement of the liability. These procedures also included, among others, (i) testing and evaluating the information used in the calculation of the liability for uncertain tax positions related to the Orbotech acquisition, including international filing positions, the related final tax returns and communications between the Company and the tax authorities; (ii) testing the calculation of the liability for uncertain tax positions by jurisdiction, including management’s assessment of the technical merits of tax positions related to the Orbotech matters and estimates of the amount of tax benefit expected to be sustained for the matters; (iii) testing the completeness of management’s assessment of both the identification of uncertain tax positions and possible outcomes of each uncertain tax position; and (iv) evaluating the status and results of income tax audits with other relevant tax authorities. Professionals with specialized skill and knowledge were used to assist in the evaluation of the completeness and measurement of the uncertain tax positions related to the Orbotech acquisition, including evaluating the reasonableness of management’s assessment of whether tax positions are more-likely-than-not of being sustained, the amount of potential benefit to be realized, and the application of relevant tax laws.
/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP

San Jose, California
August 4, 201716, 2019

We have served as the Company’s auditor since 1977.

ITEM 9.CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE
None.
 
ITEM 9A.CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES
Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures
The CompanyWe conducted an evaluation of the effectiveness of the design and operation of itsour disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”)) (“Disclosure Controls”) as of the end of the period covered by this Annual Report on Form 10-K (this “Report”) required by Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(b) or 15d-15(b). The controls evaluation was conducted under the supervision and with the participation of the Company’sour management, including the Company’sour Chief Executive Officer (“CEO”) and Chief Financial Officer (“CFO”). Based on this evaluation, the CEO and CFO have concluded that as of the end of the period covered by this Report the Company’sour Disclosure Controls were effective at a reasonable assurance level.
Attached as exhibits to this Report are certifications of the CEO and CFO, which are required in accordance with Rule 13a-14 of the Exchange Act. This Controls and Procedures section includes the information concerning the controls evaluation referred to in the certifications, and it should be read in conjunction with the certifications for a more complete understanding of the topics presented.
Definition of Disclosure Controls
Disclosure Controls are controls and procedures designed to reasonably assure that information required to be disclosed in the Company’sour reports filed under the Exchange Act, such as this Report, is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the SEC’s rules and forms. Disclosure Controls are also designed to reasonably assure that such information is accumulated and communicated to the Company’sour management, including theour CEO and CFO, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure. The Company’sOur Disclosure Controls include components of itsour internal control over financial reporting, which consists of control processes designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of itsour financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles in the United States. To the extent that components of the Company’sour internal control over financial reporting are included within itsour Disclosure Controls, they are included in the scope of the Company’sour annual controls evaluation.
Management’s Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting
The Company’sOur management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting as defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) under the Exchange Act. Under the supervision and with the participation of the Company’sour management, including theour CEO and CFO, the Companywe conducted an evaluation of the effectiveness of itsour internal control over financial reporting based on criteria established in the framework in Internal Control—Integrated Framework (2013) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission. Based on this evaluation, the Company’sour management concluded that the Company’sour internal control over financial reporting was effective as of June 30, 2017.2019.
The effectivenessManagement excluded Orbotech, Ltd (“Orbotech”), which was acquired by us on February 20, 2019, from its assessment of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting as of June 30, 20172019. Total assets and revenues of Orbotech excluded from our assessment of internal control over financial reporting, were $917.6 million as of June 30, 2019, and $388.9 million for the year ended June 30, 2019, respectively.
The effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting as of June 30, 2019 has been audited by PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, an independent registered public accounting firm, as stated in their report which appears in Item 8, “Financial Statements and Supplementary Data” in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

Limitations on the Effectiveness of Controls
The Company’sOur management, including the CEO and CFO, does not expect that the Company’sour Disclosure Controls or internal control over financial reporting will prevent all errorserror and all fraud. A control system, no matter how well designed and operated, can provide only reasonable, not absolute, assurance that the control system’s objectives will be met. Further, the design of a control system must reflect the fact that there are resource constraints, and the benefits of controls must be considered relative to their costs. Because of the inherent limitations in all control systems, no evaluation of controls can provide absolute assurance that all control issues and instances of fraud, if any, within the Company have been detected. These inherent limitations include the realities that judgments in decision making can be faulty and that breakdowns can occur because of simple error or mistake. Controls can also be circumvented by the individual acts of some persons, by collusion of two or more people, or by management override of the controls. The design of any system of controls is based in part on certain assumptions about the likelihood of future events, and there can be no assurance that any design will succeed in achieving itsour stated goals under all potential future conditions. Over time, controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions or deterioration in the degree of compliance with policies or procedures. Because of the inherent limitations in a cost-effective control system, misstatements due to error or fraud may occur and not be detected.
Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting
There were no changes in the Company’sour internal control over financial reporting identified in connection with the evaluation required by Rule 13a-15(d) and 15d-15(d) of the Exchange Act that occurred during the fourth quarter of the fiscal year 2017ended June 30, 2019 that havehas materially affected, or areis reasonably likely to materially affect, the Company’sour internal control over financial reporting.

ITEM 9B.OTHER INFORMATION
None.
 

PART III

ITEM 10.DIRECTORS, EXECUTIVE OFFICERS AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE
For the information required by this Item, see “Information About the Directors and the Nominees,” “Information About Executive Officers,” “Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management—Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance,” “Our Corporate Governance Practices—Standards of Business Conduct; Whistleblower Hotline and Website” and “Information About the Board of Directors and Its Committees—Audit Committee” in the Proxy Statement, which is incorporated herein by reference.

ITEM 11.EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
For the information required by this Item, see “Executive Compensation and Other Matters,” “Director Compensation” and “Information About the Board of Directors and Its Committees—Compensation Committee—Risk Considerations in Our Compensation Programs” in the Proxy Statement, which is incorporated herein by reference.

ITEM 12.SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS
For the information required by this Item, see “Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management” and “Equity Compensation Plan Information” in the Proxy Statement, which is incorporated herein by reference.
 
ITEM 13.CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS, AND DIRECTOR INDEPENDENCE
For the information required by this Item, see “Certain Relationships and Related Transactions” and “Information About the Board of Directors and Its Committees —The Board of Directors” in the Proxy Statement, which is incorporated herein by reference.
 
ITEM 14.PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTING FEES AND SERVICES
For the information required by this Item, see “Proposal Two: Ratification of Appointment of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP as Our Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm for the Fiscal Year Ending June 30, 20182020” in the Proxy Statement, which is incorporated herein by reference.
 

PART IV

ITEM 15.EXHIBITS, FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES
(a) The following documents are filed as part of this Annual Report on Form 10-K:
1. Financial Statements:
The following financial statements and schedules of the Registrant are contained in Item 8, “Financial Statements and Supplementary Data” of this Annual Report on Form 10-K:
2. Financial Statement Schedule:
The following financial statement schedule of the Registrant is filed as part of this Annual Report on Form 10-K and should be read in conjunction with the financial statements:
Schedule II—Valuation and Qualifying Accounts for the years ended June 30, 2019, 2018 and 2017
All other schedules are omitted because they are either not applicable or the required information is shown in the Consolidated Financial Statements or notes thereto.
3. Exhibits
The information required by this Item is set forth in the Exhibit Index following Schedule II included in this Annual Report.


SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
    KLA-TencorKLA Corporation
     
August 4, 201716, 2019 By: 
/S/    RICHARD P. WALLACE        
(Date)   Richard P. Wallace
    President and Chief Executive Officer

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.
 
Signature  Title Date
     
/s/    RICHARD P. WALLACE    
  President, Chief Executive Officer and Director (principal executive officer) August 4, 201716, 2019
Richard P. Wallace   
     
/s/     BREN D. HIGGINS 
  Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer (principal financial officer) August 4, 201716, 2019
Bren D. Higgins   
     
/s/    VIRENDRA A. KIRLOSKAR
  Senior Vice President and Chief Accounting Officer (principal accounting officer) August 4, 201716, 2019
Virendra A. Kirloskar  
     
/s/    EDWARD W. BARNHOLT
  Chairman of the Board and Director August 4, 201715, 2019
Edward W. Barnholt  
     
/s/    ROBERT M. CALDERONI
  Director August 4, 201714, 2019
Robert M. Calderoni  
     
/s/    JOHN T. DICKSON  
  Director August 4, 201714, 2019
John T. Dickson
/s/    JENEANNE HANLEY
DirectorAugust 15, 2019
Jeneanne Hanley  
     
/s/    EMIKO HIGASHI 
 Director August 4, 201715, 2019
Emiko Higashi  
     
/s/    KEVIN J. KENNEDY 
  Director August 4, 201715, 2019
Kevin J. Kennedy  
     
/s/    GARY B. MOORE
 Director August 4, 201715, 2019
Gary B. Moore  
     
/s/    KIRAN M. PATEL       
  Director August 4, 201714, 2019
Kiran M. Patel
Director
Victor Peng
/s/    ANA G. PINCZUK    
DirectorAugust 14, 2019
Ana G. Pinczuk  
     
/s/    ROBERT A. RANGO      
 Director August 4, 201715, 2019
Robert A. Rango
/s/    DAVID C. WANG    
DirectorAugust 4, 2017
David C. Wang
  

SCHEDULE II
Valuation and Qualifying Accounts
 
(In thousands)
Balance at
Beginning
of Period
 
Charged to
Expense
 
Deductions/
Adjustments
 
Balance
at End
of Period
Balance at
Beginning
of Period
 
Charged to
Expense
 
Deductions/
Adjustments
 
Balance
at End
of Period
Fiscal Year Ended June 30, 2015:       
Allowance for Doubtful Accounts$21,827
 $
 $(164) $21,663
Allowance for Deferred Tax Assets$76,328
 $
 $15,022
 $91,350
Fiscal Year Ended June 30, 2016:       
Allowance for Doubtful Accounts$21,663
 $
 $9
 $21,672
Allowance for Deferred Tax Assets$91,350
 $1,763
 $11,855
 $104,968
Fiscal Year Ended June 30, 2017:

             
Allowance for Doubtful Accounts$21,672
 $
 $(36) $21,636
$21,672
 $
 $(36) $21,636
Allowance for Deferred Tax Assets$104,968
 $
 $15,740
 $120,708
$104,968
 $
 $15,740
 $120,708
Fiscal Year Ended June 30, 2018:       
Allowance for Doubtful Accounts$21,636
 $
 $(9,997) $11,639
Allowance for Deferred Tax Assets$120,708
 $1,152
 $41,710
 $163,570
Fiscal Year Ended June 30, 2019:

      
Allowance for Doubtful Accounts$11,639
 $364
 $(2) $12,001
Allowance for Deferred Tax Assets$163,570
 $
 $3,001
 $166,571

KLA-TENCORKLA CORPORATION
EXHIBIT INDEX
 
Exhibit
Number
 Exhibit Description Incorporated by Reference
Form File No. 
Exhibit
Number
 Filing Date
2.1 Agreement and Plan of Merger and Reorganization, dated as of October 20, 2015, by and among Lam Research Corporation, Topeka Merger Sub 1, Inc., Topeka Merger sub 2, Inc. and KLA-Tencor Corporation 8-K No. 000-09992 2.1 October 21, 2015
2.2 Termination Agreement with Lam Research Corporation 8-K No. 000-09992 2.1 October 6, 2016
3.1 Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation 10-Q No. 000-09992 3.1 May 14, 1997
3.2 Certificate of Amendment of Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation 10-Q No. 000-09992 3.1 February 14, 2001
3.3 Certificate of Amendment to Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation of the Company effective as of November 8, 2012 8-K No. 000-09992 3.1 November 13, 2012
3.4 Amended and Restated Bylaws of the Company effective as of May 7, 2015 8-K No. 000-09992 3.1 May 8, 2015
4.1 Indenture dated November 6, 2014 between KLA-Tencor Corporation and Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as trustee 8-K No. 000-09992 4.1 November 7, 2014
4.2 Form of Officer’s Certificate setting forth the terms of the Notes (with form of Notes attached) 8-K No. 000-09992 4.2 November 7, 2014
10.1 2004 Equity Incentive Plan (as amended and restated (as of August 7, 2014))* 8-K No. 000-09992 10.45 August 12, 2014
10.2 Notice of Grant of Restricted Stock Units* 10-Q No. 000-09992 10.18 May 4, 2006
10.3 Form of Restricted Stock Unit Award Notification (Performance-Vesting) (approved August 2014)* 8-K No. 000-09992 10.49 August 12, 2014
10.4 Form of Restricted Stock Unit Award Notification (Service-Vesting) (approved August 2012)* 8-K No. 000-09992 10.1 August 2, 2012
10.5 Form of Restricted Stock Unit Award Notification (Service-Vesting; 25% Annual Vesting) (approved August 2014)* 8-K No. 000-09992 10.50 August 12, 2014
10.6 Form of Restricted Stock Unit Award Notification (Service-Vesting; 50% Vesting Year Two, 50% Vesting Year Four) (approved August 2014)* 8-K No. 000-09992 10.51 August 12, 2014
10.7 Form of Restricted Stock Unit Agreement for U.S. Employees (with Dividend Equivalents) (approved August 2014)* 8-K No. 000-09992 10.46 August 12, 2014
10.8 Form of Restricted Stock Unit Agreement for Non-U.S. Employees (with Dividend Equivalents) (approved August 2014)* 8-K No. 000-09992 10.48 August 12, 2014
10.9 KLA-Tencor Corporation Performance Bonus Plan* DEF 14A No. 000-09992 App. B September 26, 2013
10.10 Fiscal Year 2015 Executive Incentive Plan*+ 10-Q No. 000-09992 10.53 October 24, 2014
10.11 Fiscal Year 2016 Executive Incentive Plan*+ 10-Q No. 000-09992 10.44 October 22, 2015
10.12 Executive Deferred Savings Plan (as amended and restated effective November 7, 2012)* 10-Q No. 000-09992 10.42 January 25, 2013
Exhibit
Number
 Exhibit Description Incorporated by Reference
Form File No. 
Exhibit
Number
 Filing Date
         
  8-K No. 000-09992 3.2 July 16, 2019
  8-K No. 000-09992 4.1 November 7, 2014
  8-K No. 000-09992 4.2 November 7, 2014
  8-K No. 000-09992 4.2 March 20, 2019
  S-8 No. 228283 10.1 November 8, 2018
  10-Q No. 000-09992 10.18 May 4, 2006
  8-K No. 000-09992 10.49 August 12, 2014
  8-K No. 000-09992 10.1 August 2, 2012
  8-K No. 000-09992 10.50 August 12, 2014
  8-K No. 000-09992 10.51 August 12, 2014
  8-K No. 000-09992 10.46 August 12, 2014
  8-K No. 000-09992 10.48 August 12, 2014
         
  8-K No. 000-09992 10.1 November 30, 2017
  8-K No. 000-09992 10.1 October 20, 2016
  10-Q No. 000-09992 10.45 October 22, 2015
         
  S-8 No. 333-230112 10.1 March 7, 2019

Exhibit
Number
 Exhibit Description Incorporated by Reference
Form File No. 
Exhibit
Number
 Filing Date
10.13 Credit Agreement dated November 14, 2014 among KLA-Tencor Corporation, the lenders party thereto and JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., as administrative agent 8-K No. 000-09992 10.54 November 17, 2014
10.14 Fiscal year 2017 6-Month Executive Incentive Plan*+ 10-Q No. 000-09992 10.1 October 20, 2016
10.15 Amended and Restated Executive Severance Plan* 8-K No. 000-09992 10.1 October 20, 2016
10.16 Amended and Restated 2010 Executive Severance Plan 10-Q No. 000-09992 10.45 October 22, 2015
10.17 Calendar Year 2017 Executive Incentive Plan*+ 10-Q No. 000-09992 10.1 April 28, 2017
12.1 Computation of Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges        
21.1 List of Subsidiaries        
23.1 Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm        
31.1 Certification of Chief Executive Officer under Rule 13a-14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934        
31.2 Certification of Chief Financial Officer under Rule 13a-14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934        
32 Certification of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350        
99.1 Risks related to the Merger with Lam Research        
101.INS XBRL Instance Document        
101.SCH XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document        
101.CAL XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document        
101.DEF XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase Document        
101.LAB XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase Document        
101.PRE XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document        
Exhibit
Number
 Exhibit Description Incorporated by Reference
Form File No. 
Exhibit
Number
 Filing Date
  S-8 
No. 333-230112

 10.2 March 7, 2019
  S-8 
No. 333-230112

 10.3 March 7, 2019
  10-Q No. 000-09992 10.1 May 8, 2019
  10-Q No. 000-0992 10.2 May 8, 2019
         
         
         
         
         
101.INS XBRL Instance Document        
101.SCH XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document        
101.CAL XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document        
101.DEF XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase Document        
101.LAB XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase Document        
101.PRE XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document        
__________________
*Denotes a management contract, plan or arrangement.
+Confidential treatment has been requested as to a portion of this exhibit.



ITEM 16.     FORM 10-K SUMMARY
None.


112127