UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-K
(Mark One)
[X] ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 or 15(d) OF
THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 19971998
OR
[ ] TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF
THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
FOR THE TRANSITION PERIOD FROM __________ TO __________
0-9781
(Commission File Number)
CONTINENTAL AIRLINES, INC.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
Delaware 74-2099724
(State or other jurisdiction of (IRS Employer
incorporation or organization) Identification No.)
2929 Allen Parkway, Suite 2010,1600 Smith Street, Dept. HQSEO, Houston, Texas 7701977002
(Address of principal executive offices) (Zip Code)
Registrant's telephone number, including area code: 713-834-2950713-324-2950
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:
Name of Each Exchange
Title of Each Class on Which Registered
Class A Common Stock, New York Stock Exchange
Inc.
par value $.01 per share
Class B Common Stock, New York Stock Exchange
Inc.
par value $.01 per share
Series A Junior Participating New York Stock Exchange
Preferred Stock Purchase Rights
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act:
None
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all
reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or
for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file
such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements
for the past 90 days. Yes X No
Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers
pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and
will not be contained, to the best of registrant's knowledge, in
definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by
reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this
Form 10-K. [ ]
The aggregate market value of the voting and non-voting common
equity stock held by non-affiliates of the registrant was $3.2$1.9
billion as of March 11, 1998.
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has filed all
documents and reports required to be filed by Section 12, 13 or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 subsequent to the
distribution of securities under a plan confirmed by a court.
Yes X NoFebruary 17, 1999.
_______________
As of March 11, 1998, 8,379,464February 17, 1999, 11,406,732 shares of Class A Common
Stock and 50,951,66357,400,355 shares of Class B Common Stock were
outstanding.
DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE
Proxy Statement for Annual Meeting
of Stockholders to be held on May 21, 1998:18, 1999: PART III
PART I
ITEM 1. BUSINESS.
Continental Airlines, Inc. (the "Company" or "Continental") is a
major United States air carrier engaged in the business of
transporting passengers, cargo and mail. Continental is the fifth
largest United States airline (as measured by 19971998 revenue
passenger miles) and, together with its wholly owned subsidiaries,
Continental Express, Inc. ("Express") and Continental Micronesia,
Inc. ("CMI"), each a Delaware corporation, serves 191206 airports
worldwide.worldwide at February 1, 1999. As of MarchFebruary 1, 1998,1999, Continental
flies to 125127 domestic and 6679 international destinations and offers
additional connecting service through alliances with domestic and
foreign carriers. Continental directly serves 1013 European cities,
eight South American cities and Tokyo and is one of the leading
airlines providing service to Mexico and Central America, serving
more destinations there than any other United States airline. Continental currently flies to seven cities in South
America.
Through its Guam hub, CMI provides extensive service in the western
Pacific, including service to more Japanese cities than any other
United States carrier.
As used in this Form 10-K, the terms "Continental" and "Company"
refer to Continental Airlines, Inc. and its subsidiaries, unless
the context indicates otherwise. This Form 10-K may contain
forward-looking statements. In connection therewith, please see
the cautionary statements contained in Item 1. "Business - Risk
Factors Relating to the Company" and "Business - Risk Factors
Relating to the Airline Industry" which identify important factors
that could cause actual results to differ materially from those in
the forward-looking statements.
Continental/Northwest Alliance and Related Agreements
On January 26, 1998, the Company announced that, in connection with
an agreement by Air Partners, L.P. ("Air Partners") to dispose of
its interest in the Company to an affiliate of Northwest Airlines,
Inc. ("Northwest"), the Company had entered into a long-term global
alliance with Northwest ("Northwest Alliance") involving schedule
coordination, frequent flyer reciprocity, executive lounge access,
airport facility coordination, code-sharing, the formation of a
joint venture among the two carriers and KLM Royal Dutch Airlines
("KLM") with respect to their trans-Atlantic services, cooperation
regarding other alliance partners of the two carriers and regional
alliance development, certain coordinated sales programs, preferred
reservations displays and other activities.
The Northwest Alliance is expected to be phased in over a multi-
year period. A significant portion of the alliance activities will
commence promptly. Code-sharing will commence, subject to
governmental approvals, with the Company initially placing its
designator code on all of Northwest's international flights (other
than its trans-Atlantic flights) and those Northwest domestic
flights which create international connecting itineraries to and
from Latin America. Thereafter, subject to governmental approval
and approval by Northwest's pilots under their collective
bargaining agreement, (i) Northwest and the Company anticipate
entering into a joint venture among themselves and KLM with respect
to their respective trans-Atlantic flights, (ii) Northwest
anticipates placing its designator code on substantially all of the
Company's other international flights, and (iii) Northwest and the
Company each anticipate placing their respective designator codes
on substantially all of the other carrier's domestic flights.
The Company estimates that the alliance, when fully phased in over
a three-year period, will generate in excess of $500 million in
additional annual pre-tax operating income for the carriers, and
anticipates that approximately 45% of such pre-tax operating income
will accrue to the Company. The Company believes that a
significant portion of the alliance synergies allocable to the
Company can be achieved even without the activities which are
subject to approval of Northwest's pilots.
The Company also announced on January 26, 1998 that Air Partners,
the holder of approximately 14% of the Company's equity and
approximately 51% of its voting power (after giving effect to the
exercise of warrants), had entered into an agreement to dispose of
its interest in the Company to an affiliate of Northwest (the "Air
Partners Transaction"). The Air Partners Transaction is subject
to, among other matters, governmental approval and expiration of
applicable waiting periods under the Hart-Scott-Rodino Antitrust
Improvements Act of 1976. The agreement also extends to an
affiliate of Air Partners a right of first offer to purchase
certain shares of Class A common stock of the Company to be
acquired by Northwest or its affiliates if such entities intend to
dispose of those securities prior to the fifth anniversary of the
closing of the Air Partners Transaction.
In connection with the Air Partners Transaction, the Company
entered into a corporate governance agreement with certain
affiliates of Northwest (the "Northwest Parties") designed to
assure the independence of the Company's board and management
during the six-year term of the governance agreement. Under the
corporate governance agreement, as amended, the Northwest Parties
have agreed not to beneficially own voting securities of the
Company in excess of 50.1% of the fully diluted voting power of the
Company's voting securities, subject to certain exceptions
involving third-party acquisitions or tender offers for 15% or more
of the voting power of the Company's voting securities and a
limited exception permitting a one-time ownership of approximately
50.4% of the fully diluted voting power. The Northwest Parties
have agreed to deposit all voting securities of the Company
beneficially owned by them in a voting trust with an independent
voting trustee requiring that such securities be voted (i) on all
matters other than the election of directors, either as recommended
by the Company's board of directors (a majority of whom must be
independent directors as defined in the agreement) or in the same
proportion as the votes cast by other holders of voting securities,
and (ii) in the election of directors, for the election of
independent directors nominated by the board of directors;
provided, that in the event of a merger or similar business
combination or a recapitalization, liquidation or similar
transaction, a sale of all or substantially all of the Company's
assets, or an issuance of voting securities which would represent
more than 20% of the voting power of the Company prior to issuance,
or any amendment of the Company's charter or by-laws that would
materially and adversely affect Northwest, the shares may be voted
as directed by the Northwest Party owning such shares, and if a
third party is soliciting proxies in connection with an election of
directors, the shares may be voted at the option of such Northwest
Party either as recommended by the Company's board of directors or
in the same proportion as the votes cast by the other holders of
voting securities.
The Northwest Parties have also agreed to certain restrictions on
the transfer of voting securities owned by them, have agreed not to
seek to affect or influence the Company's board of directors or the
control of the management of the Company or the business,
operations, affairs, financial matters or policies of the Company
or to take certain other actions, and have agreed to take all
actions as are necessary to cause independent directors to at all
times constitute at least a majority of the Company's board of
directors. The Company has agreed to cause one designee of a
Northwest Party reasonably acceptable to the board of directors to
be appointed to the Company's board, and has agreed to grant
preemptive rights to a Northwest Party with respect to certain
issuances of Class A common stock and Class B common stock. The
Northwest Parties have agreed that certain specified actions,
together with any material transactions between the Company and
Northwest or its affiliates, including any modifications or waivers
of the corporate governance agreement and the alliance agreement,
may not be taken without the prior approval of a majority of the
board of directors, including the affirmative vote of a majority of
the independent directors. The governance agreement also provides
for the Company to adopt a shareholder rights plan with reasonably
customary terms and conditions, with an acquiring person threshold
of 15% and with appropriate exceptions for the Northwest Parties
for actions permitted by and taken in compliance with the corporate
governance agreement.
The corporate governance agreement provides that, if after three
years Northwest's pilots have not consented to those portions of
the alliance agreement requiring their consent and the Company, at
its election, then chooses to terminate the alliance agreement, the
Northwest Parties can elect either to dispose of their shares in
the Company or negotiate with a committee of independent directors
of the Company regarding a merger. If a merger agreement cannot be
reached within six months of the establishment of the committee,
certain appraisal procedures are specified. If upon completion of
the appraisal procedures, Northwest is unwilling to enter into a
merger agreement at the value for the shares not held by the
Northwest Parties determined by such appraisal procedures, then the
Northwest Parties must sell their voting securities, and if the
Company and the committee are unwilling to approve a merger
agreement at such value, then the corporate governance agreement
(except for certain provisions requiring continuing independent
directors and approval by a majority of such independent directors
of material transactions between the Company and the Northwest
Parties) will expire.
The corporate governance agreement will otherwise expire after the
sixth anniversary of the date of closing of the Air Partners
Transaction, or if earlier, upon the date that the Northwest
Parties cease to beneficially own voting securities representing at
least 10% of the fully diluted voting power of the Company's voting
securities. Upon a termination of the above described terms of the
governance agreement, the Northwest Parties must nonetheless take
such actions as are necessary to cause the Company's board of
directors to at all times include at least five directors who are
independent of and otherwise unaffiliated with Northwest or the
Company and their respective affiliates, and any material
transaction between the Company and Northwest or its affiliates, or
relating to the governance agreement or the alliance agreement, may
not be taken without prior approval thereof by a majority vote of
the independent directors.
The alliance agreement provides that if after four years the
Company has not entered into a code-share with KLM or is not
legally able (but for aeropolitical restrictions) to enter into a
new trans-Atlantic joint venture with KLM and Northwest and place
its airline code on certain Northwest flights, Northwest can elect
to (i) cause good faith negotiations among the Company, KLM and
Northwest as to the impact, if any, on the contribution to the
joint venture resulting from the absence of the code-share, and the
Company will reimburse the joint venture for the amount of any loss
until it enters into a code-share with KLM, or (ii) terminate
(subject to cure rights of the Company) after one year's notice any
or all of such alliance agreement and any or all of the agreements
contemplated thereunder.
Business Strategy
In 1995, Continental implemented a plan, labeled the "Go Forward
Plan", which was a "back to basics" approach focusing on improving
profitability and financial condition, delivering a consistent,
reliable, quality product to customers and improving employee
morale and working conditions. The Company's 19981999 strategic plan,
as discussed below, retains the four basic components of the Go
Forward Plan: Fly to Win, Fund the Future, Make Reliability a
Reality and Working Together, with initiatives intended to build
upon Continental's operational and strategic strengths.
Fly to Win
The Company's 19981999 Fly to Win initiatives center around three
principal themes: Grow Hub Operations, Improve Business/Leisure
Mix and Strengthen its Alliance Network.
Grow Hub Operations. Continental will continue to add select
flights and refine its flight schedules to maximize the potential
of its hubs. In addition, Continental plans to focus on expanding
international traffic through service to new destinations and
additional code-sharing and other marketing alliances with certain foreign
carriers.
Management believes that by adding domestic and international
flights to the Company's hubs, attracting more international
passengers through alliances with foreign carriers and further
refining the efficiency of the Company's hub operations,
Continental will continue to capture additional flow traffic
through its hubs and attract a larger share of higher-yielding
business travelers.
Improve Business/Leisure Mix. The Company's passenger load factors
increased from 68.1% in 1996 to 70.9% in 1997 to 72.1% in 1998, facilitating
management of the business/leisure traveler mix on its aircraft.
Since business travelers typically pay a higher fare (on a revenue-
per-seat-mile basis) for the convenience of being able to make and
change last minute travel plans, increases in business traffic
contribute disproportionately to incremental profitability.
Unrestricted business fares accounted for approximately 43.8%44.3% of
the Company's domestic passenger revenue in 19971998 compared to 42.8%43.8%
in 19961997 (excluding CMI and Express). Many of the Company's product and
schedule improvements have been made to appeal to business
travelers. The Company has invested in state-of-the-art revenue
management and pricing systems to enhance its ability to manage its
fare mix.
Strengthen its Alliance Network. Management believes that
strengthening the Company's network of alliance partners will allow
it to compete with larger global airline alliances, better leverage
the Company's hub assets and result in improved returns to the
Company. Focusing on strategic global alliances allows the Company
to benefit from the strengths of its alliance partners in their
local markets while reducing the Company's reliance on any
individual alliance partner.
The Company seeks alliance relationships that, together with the
Company's own flying, will permit expanded service through Newark
to major destinations in SouthLatin America, Europe and Asia, and
expanded service through Houston to SouthLatin America and Europe as
well as service to Japan. Route authorities that would be required
for the Company's own service to certain of these destinations are
not currently available to the Company. In November 1998, the
Company began implementing its long-term global alliance with
Northwest Airlines, Inc. ("Northwest"), which will continue to be
phased in over a multi-year period. See "Continental/Northwest
Alliance and Related Agreements" above"Domestic Carrier
Alliances" and "Foreign Carrier Alliances" below for a discussion
of new alliances recently entered into with other carriers.
Fund the Future
Having achieved its 1995 goals of building the Company's overall
liquidity and improving its financial condition, management shifted
its financial focus in 1996 and 1997 to target the Company's
interest and lease expenses. Through refinancingIn 1998, the Company concentrated on
securing favorable financing for new aircraft and other initiatives, Continental has achieved substantial reductions in
interest and lease expenses attributable to financing arrangements
that were entered into when the Company was in a less favorable
financial position.assets as
well as buying back common stock.
In 19971998 and early 1998,1999, the Company completed a number of
transactions intended to strengthen its long-term financial
position and enhance earnings:
- - In March 1997, ContinentalFebruary 1998, the Company completed an offering of $707$773
million of pass-through certificates to be used to finance (through
either leveraged leases or secured debt financings) the debt
portion of the acquisition cost of up to 30 new aircraft from The
Boeing Company ("Boeing") scheduled to be delivered through April
1998.
- - In April 1997, Continental entered into a $160 million secured
revolving credit facility to be used for the purpose of making
certain predelivery payments to Boeing for new Boeing aircraft to
be delivered through December 1999.
- - In April 1997, Continental redeemed for cash all of the 460,247
outstanding shares of its Series A 12% Cumulative Preferred Stock
held by an affiliate of Air Canada for $100 per share plus
accrued dividends thereon. The redemption price, including
accrued dividends, totaled $48 million.
- - In June 1997, Continental purchased from Air Partners for $94
million in cash warrants to purchase 3,842,542 shares of Class B
common stock of the Company.
- - In June 1997, Continental completed an offering of $155 million
of pass-through certificates which were used to finance the
acquisition of 10 aircraft previously leased by the Company.
- - In July 1997, Continental entered into a $575 million credit
facility, including $350 million of term loans, $275 million of
which was loaned by Continental to its wholly owned subsidiary
Air Micronesia, Inc. ("AMI"), reloaned by AMI to its wholly owned
subsidiary, CMI, and used by CMI to repay its existing secured
term loan. The facility also includes a $225 million revolving
credit facility.
- - In July 1997, the Company (i) purchased (a) the right of United
Micronesia Development Association, Inc. ("UMDA") to receive
future payments under a services agreement between UMDA and CMI
and (b) UMDA's 9% interest in AMI, (ii) terminated the Company's
obligations to UMDA under a settlement agreement entered into in
1987, and (iii) terminated substantially all of the other
contractual arrangements between the Company, AMI and CMI, on the
one hand, and UMDA on the other hand, for an aggregate
consideration of $73 million.
- - In September 1997, Continental completed an offering of $89
million of pass-through certificates which were used to finance
the debt portion of the acquisition cost of nine Embraer ERJ-145
("ERJ-145") regional jets.
- - In October 1997, the Company completed an offering of $752
million of pass-through certificates to be used to finance
(through either leveraged leases or secured debt financings) the
debt portion of the acquisition cost of up to 24 new Boeing
aircraft scheduled to be delivered from April 1998 through
November 1998.
- - In February 1998, the Company completed an offering of $773
million of pass-through certificates to be used to finance
(through either leveraged leases or secured debt financings) the
debt portion of the acquisition cost of up to 24 aircraft
scheduled to be delivered from
February 1998 through December 1998.
- - In addition, during 1997 andDuring the first quarter of 1998, Continental completed several
offerings totaling approximately $291$98 million aggregate principal
amount of tax-exempt special facilities revenue bonds to finance
or refinance certain airport facility projects. These bonds are
payable solely from rentals paid by Continental under long-term
lease agreements with the respective governing bodies.
- - In April 1998, the Company completed an offering of $187 million
of pass-through certificates used to refinance the debt related
to 14 aircraft currently owned by Continental.
- - During the fourth quarter of 1998, the Company completed an
offering of $524 million of pass-through certificates to be used
to finance (through either leveraged leases or secured debt
financings) the debt portion of the acquisition cost of up to 14
aircraft scheduled to be delivered from December 1998 through May
1999.
- - In November 1998, the Company exercised its right and called for
redemption approximately half of its outstanding 8-1/2%
Convertible Trust Originated Preferred Securities ("TOPrS"). The
TOPrS were convertible into shares of Class B common stock at a
conversion price of $24.18 per share of Class B common stock. As
a result of the call for redemption, 2,688,173 TOPrS were
converted into 5,558,649 shares of Class B common stock. In
December 1998, the Company called for redemption the remaining
outstanding TOPrS. As a result of the second call, the remaining
2,298,327 TOPrS were converted into 4,752,522 shares of Class B
common stock during January 1999.
- - In December 1998, the Company sold $200 million principal amount
of 8% unsecured senior notes due in December 2005. The proceeds
will be used for general corporate purposes.
- -In February 1999, the Company completed an offering of $806
million of pass-through certificates to be used to finance
(through either leveraged leases or secured debt financings) the
debt portion of the acquisition cost of up to 22 aircraft
scheduled to be delivered from March 1999 through September 1999.
The focus in 19981999 is to maintain stable cash balances while
continuing to pay down debt, secure financing for aircraft deliveries in 19981999 and
1999beyond and, under appropriate circumstances, buy back stock.common stock
or common stock equivalents. The Company expects to continue,
through refinancings and other initiatives, to eliminate excess
interest and lease expenses.expenses and complete its transition from Stage
2 to Stage 3 aircraft.
Make Reliability a Reality
Customer service continues to be thea principal focus in 1998.1999.
Management believes Continental's on-time performance record is
crucial to its other operational objectives and, together with its
initiatives to improve baggage handling and customer satisfaction
and appropriately manage involuntary denied boarding
initiatives,boardings, is an
important tool to attract higher-margin business travelers.
Continental's goal for 19981999 is to be ranked monthly by the
Department of Transportation ("DOT") among the top threehalf of major
air carriers (excluding those airlines who do not report
electronically) in on-time performance, baggage handling, customer
satisfaction and avoidance of involuntary denied boarding. For
1997,1998, Continental ranked fifthsixth in on-time performance, second in
baggage handling, fourthfifth in fewest customer complaints and first in
fewest involuntary denied boardings. In 1997,1998, bonuses of $65 were
paid to substantially all employees for each month that Continental
ranked second or third or achieved 80% or above (for arrivals
within 14 minutes) in on-time performance, and bonuses of $100 were
paid for each month that Continental ranked first among the top 10
U.S. air carriers (excluding those airlines who do not report
electronically) in on-time performance. For 1997,1998, a total of $21$23
million of on-time bonuses waswere paid. This successful on-time
performance bonus program continues in 1998.1999.
In addition to programs intended to improve Continental's standings
in DOT performance data, the Company has acted in a number of
additional areas to enhance its attractiveness to business
travelers and the travel agent community. Specifically,
Continental implemented various initiatives designed to offer
travelers cleaner and more attractive aircraft interiors,
consistent interior and exterior decor, first class seating on all
jet aircraft (other than regional jets), better meals and greater
benefits under its award-
winningaward-winning frequent flyer program.
In 1996 and 1997, Continental continuedcontinues to make product improvements, such as new and
refurbished Presidents Clubs with specialty bars, and on-board
specialty coffees and microbrewery beer, among others. In 1997,All the
Company
switchedCompany's jets expected to a new inflight telephoneremain in service provider that offersafter 1999 now have
reliable air-to-ground telephone service on boardfor customers, and its jet aircraft.
The Company expects to complete the installation of inflight
telephones on all its Stage 3 aircraft in 1998. The Company has
also continued to refine its award-winning BusinessFirst service.new
long-range jets have state-of-the-art video equipment.
In January 1998, Continental launched its TransContinental service
whereby passengers traveling coast-to-coast from Newark
International Airport ("Newark International"Newark") will experience new enhancements on
their flights, including new check-in options at nine New York
locations, flexible meal options and door-to-door pick-up service.
The focus in 1998 also includesIn addition, the integration
ofCompany successfully integrated the Boeing 777 and
737-700/800 aircraft into the fleet and the
enhancement of the entertainment equipment on board theits fleet. The Company has also
continued to refine its award-winning BusinessFirst service.
Working Together
Management believes that Continental's employees are its greatest
asset, as well as the cornerstones of improved reliability and
customer service. Management has introduced a variety of programs
to increase employee participation and foster a sense of shared
community. These initiatives include significant efforts to
communicate openly and honestly with all employees through daily
news bulletins, weekly voicemail updates from the Company's Chief
Executive Officer, monthly and quarterly Continental publications,
videotapes mailed to employees reporting on the Company's growth
and aprogress, Go Forward Plan bulletin boardboards in over 600 locations
system-wide.system-wide, and daily news electronic display signs in many
Continental employee locations. In addition, regularly scheduled
visits to airports throughout the route system are made by the
senior executives of the Company (each of whom is assigned an
airport for this purpose). Monthly meetings open to all employees,
as well as other periodic on-site visits by management, are
designed to encourage employee participation, knowledge and
cooperation. Continental was recently named among the best
companies to work for in America, finishing 40th in Fortune
Magazine's 1998 "100 Best Companies to Work for in America" list.
Continental also reached long-term agreements with a majority of
its employee workgroups regarding wages, benefits and other
workplace matters.
Continental's goalgoals for 1998 is1999 include (i) to be ranked among the top
three major air carriers in employee measures such as turnover,
lost time, productivity and on-the-job injury claims.claims, (ii) to
continue working with all employee groups in a way that is fair to
both the employees and the Company, (iii) to continue to improve
work environment safety, and (iv) to maintain Continental as one of
the 100 best companies to work for in America.
In September 1997, Continental announced that it intendsintended to bring
all employees to industry standard wages over a three-year period.period,
and has made substantial progress in doing so. See "Employees"
below.
Domestic Operations
Continental operates its domestic route system primarily through
its hubs at Newark, International, George Bush Intercontinental Airport ("Bush
Intercontinental") in Houston and Hopkins International Airport
("Hopkins International") in Cleveland. In
addition, as part of its alliance with Northwest, Continental's
system will connect with Northwest's hubs in Minneapolis, Detroit
and Memphis. See "Continental/Northwest Alliance and Related
Agreements" above. The Company's hub system
allows it to transport passengers between a large number of
destinations with substantially more frequent service than if each
route were served directly. The hub system also allows Continental
to add service to a new destination from a large number of cities
using only one or a limited number of aircraft. Each of
Continental's domestic hubs is located in a large business and
population center, contributing to a high volume of "origin and
destination" traffic.
Newark. As of MarchFebruary 1, 1998,1999, Continental operated 58% (24455% (237
departures) of the average daily jet departures (excluding regional
jets) and, together with Express, 59% (35458% (333 departures) of all
average daily departures (jet, regional jet and turboprop) from
Newark International.Newark. Considering the three major airports serving New York City
(Newark, International, LaGuardia and John F. Kennedy), Continental and Express
accounted for 24% of all daily departures, while the next largest
carrier, US Airways,American Airlines, Inc. ("US
Airways"), and its commuter affiliate
accounted for 15%14% of all daily departures.
Houston. As of MarchFebruary 1, 1998,1999, Continental operated 80%
(33378%
(328 departures) of the average daily jet departures (excluding
regional jets) and, together with Express, 84% (47982% (467 departures) of
all average daily departures from Bush Intercontinental. Southwest
Airlines Co. ("Southwest") also has a significant share of the
Houston market through Hobby Airport. Considering both Bush
Intercontinental and Hobby Airport, Continental operated 58%56% and
Southwest operated 26%25% of the daily jet departures (excluding
regional jets) from Houston.
Cleveland. As of MarchFebruary 1, 1998,1999, Continental operated 55% (9851% (86
departures) of the average daily jet departures (excluding regional
jets) and, together with Express, 67% (24765% (232 departures) of all
average daily departures from Hopkins International. The next
largest carrier, Southwest,US Airways, Inc. ("US Airways"), accounted for 6%
of all daily departures.
Continental Express. Continental'sContinental Airlines' jet service at each of
its domestic hub cities is coordinated with Express, which operates
new-generation turboprop aircraft and regional jets under the name
"Continental Express". The turboprop aircraft average
approximately fiveseven years of age and seat 64 passengers or lessfewer passengers
while the regional jets average less than one year of age and seat 50
passengers.
In September 1996, Express placed a firm order for 25 ERJ-145
regional jets, with options for an additional 175 aircraft
exercisable through 2008. In June 1997, Express exercised its
option to order 25 of such option aircraft and expects to confirm
its order for an additional 25 of its remaining 150 option aircraft
by August 1998. Express took delivery of 18 of the aircraft
through December 31, 1997 and will take delivery of the remaining
32 aircraft through the third quarter of 1999. The Company expects
to account for all of these aircraft as operating leases. Express
began service with its regional jets in Cleveland in April 1997.
See Item 7. "Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial
Condition and Results of Operations. Liquidity and Capital
Commitments".
As of MarchFebruary 1, 1998,1999, Express served 1930 destinations from Newark
International (eight(15 by regional jet), 2132 destinations from Bush Intercontinental
(two(12 by regional jet) and 3641 destinations from Hopkins International
(seven(13 by regional jet). In addition, commuter feed traffic is
currently provided by other code-sharing partners. See "Domestic
Carrier Alliances" below.
Management believes Express's turboprop and regional jet operations
complement Continental's jet operations by allowing more frequent
service to small cities than could be provided economically with
conventional jet aircraft and by carrying traffic that connects
onto Continental's jets. In many cases, Express (and Continental)
compete for such connecting traffic with commuter airlines owned by
or affiliated with other major airlines operating out of the same
or other cities. Continental believes that Express's new ERJ-145 regional
jets provide greater comfort and enjoy better customer acceptance
than turboprop aircraft. TheseThe regional jets also allow Express to
serve certain routes that cannot be served by its turboprop
aircraft.
Domestic Carrier Alliances. Pursuant to the Company's Fly to Win
initiative under the Go Forward Plan, Continental has entered into
and continues to develop alliances with domestic carriers:
- - OnIn January 26, 1998, the Company announced that it had entered into
a long-term global alliance with Northwest. See
"Continental/Northwest ("Northwest
Alliance"). The Northwest Alliance includes the placing by each
carrier of its code on a large number of the flights of the other
and Related Agreements" above.reciprocal frequent flyer programs and executive lounge
access. Significant other joint marketing activities will be
undertaken, while preserving the separate identities of the
carriers. See "Risk Factors Relating to the Company - Risks
Regarding Continental/Northwest Alliance".
- - Continental has entered into a series of agreements with America West
Airlines, Inc. ("America West"), including agreements related to
code-sharing and ground handling, which have created substantial
benefits for both airlines. These code-sharing agreements cover
7363 city-pairs at February 1, 1999, and allow Continental to link
additional destinations to its route network.network and derive
additional traffic from America West's distribution strength in
cities where Continental has less sales presence. The sharing of
facilities and employees by Continental and America West in their
respective key markets has resulted in significant cost savings.
- - Currently, SkyWest Airlines, Inc., a commuter operator, provides
Continental access to five additional markets in California
through Los Angeles.
- - Continental has entered into a code-sharing agreement with Gulfstream
International Airlines, Inc. ("Gulfstream") which commenced in
April 1997. Gulfstream serves as a connection for Continental
passengers throughout Florida as well as fivesix markets in the
Bahamas.
- - Continental has a code-sharing arrangement with Colgan Air, Inc.
which commenced in July 1997 on flights connecting in four cities
in the eastern United States and offers connections for
Continental passengers to ten11 cities in the northeasternNortheastern and mid-
Atlantic regions of the United States.
- - Continental has a code-sharing agreement with Mesaba Aviation,
Inc. ("Mesaba"), operating as a Northwest affiliate, which
commenced on January 14, 1999. Mesaba serves as a connection for
Continental passengers through Detroit and Minneapolis/St. Paul.
- - Continental and CMI entered into a cooperative marketing
agreement with Hawaiian Airlines that began October 1, 1997 on
flights connecting in Honolulu.
International Operations
International Operations. Continental directly serves destinations
throughout Europe, Canada, Mexico, the Caribbean and Central and South America, and
the Caribbean, as well as Tokyo, and has extensive operations in
the western Pacific conducted by CMI. Continental's revenue from international
operations has increased each of the last three years and, asAs measured by 19971998
available seat miles, approximately 31.4%33.8% of Continental's jet
operations, including CMI, were dedicated to international traffic. See Note 15traffic,
compared with 31.4% in 1997. Continental anticipates that a
majority of Notes to Consolidated Financial
Statements.its capacity growth in 1999 will be international. As
of MarchFebruary 1, 1998,1999, the Company offered 112132 weekly departures to
1013 European cities and marketed service to six33 other cities through
code-sharing agreements. Continental is one of the leading
airlines providing service to Mexico and Central America, serving
more destinations there than any other United States airline.
The Company was recently awarded route authority to fly
to Tokyo from both its Newark and Houston hubs receiving a total of
14 frequencies for the two cities. Initially, the Company will use
seven frequencies at its Newark hub with daily non-stop service
scheduled to begin in November 1998. The Company will begin daily
non-stop service to Tokyo from Houston in December 1998.
The Company's Newark hub is a significant international gateway.
From Newark at February 1, 1999, the Company serves 1013 European
cities and twofour Canadian cities, three Mexican cities, two Central
American cities, six South American cities and six Caribbean
destinations, and markets service to Amsterdam, Prague and certain other destinations in Canada, the United Kingdom and Europe through code-
sharingcode-sharing
arrangements with foreign carriers. In addition, Continental
recently
announced new non-stop service, subject to government approval,
between Newark and Dublin and Shannon, Ireland (effective June
1998), and Newark and Glasgow, Scotland (effective July 1998). The
Company also has code-sharing agreements and joint marketing
arrangements with other foreign carriers which management believes
are important to Continental's ability to compete effectively as an
international airline. See "Foreign Carrier Alliances" discussed
below.
The Company also hascommenced non-stop service to two Mexican cities, six
Caribbean destinationsTokyo in November 1998, and four South American cities from Newark.
Continental recently received authority from the DOThas
announced plans to begin non-stop service between Newarkto Amsterdam (subject to
government approval), Brussels, Tel Aviv and Santiago, Chile. The service is
scheduled to begin on May 30, 1998.Zurich in 1999.
The Company's Houston hub is the focus of its operations in Mexico
and Central America. As of February 1, 1999, Continental currently flies
from Houston to 1113 cities in Mexico, every country in Central
America, and five cities in South America, including new service to Caracas,
Venezuela which commenced in December 1997. Continental recently
announced four new international routes out of Houston totwo Caribbean destinations,
three cities in Mexico (Tampico, VeracruzCanada and Merida)two cities in Europe. In addition,
Continental commenced non-stop service to Tokyo in January 1999,
and Calgary,
Canada, all of which are scheduledhas been tentatively awarded non-stop service to begin in the second quarter
of 1998.Sao Paulo.
Continental also flies non-stop from Houston to Toronto, Vancouver,San Juan and Cancun from its hub
in Cleveland and has announced service to London, subject to
receipt of appropriate take-off and Paris.landing slots at Gatwick
airport.
Continental Micronesia. CMI is a United States-certificated
international air carrier engaged in the business of transporting
passengers, cargo and mail in the western Pacific. From its hub
operations based on the island of Guam, CMI provides service to
sixeight cities in Japan, more than any other United States carrier,
as well as other Pacific rim destinations, including Taiwan, the
Philippines, Hong Kong, Australia, New Caledonia and Indonesia.
Service to these Japanese cities and certain other Pacific Rim
destinations is subject to a variety of regulatory restrictions
limiting the ability of other carriers to service these markets.
CMI is the principal air carrier in the Micronesian Islands, where
it pioneered scheduled air service in 1968. CMI's route system is
linked to the United States market through Honolulu, which CMI
serves non-stop from both Tokyo and Guam.Guam, and Tokyo. CMI and
Continental also maintain a code-sharing agreement and coordinate
schedules on certain flights from the west coast of the United
States to Honolulu, and from Honolulu to Guam and Tokyo, to
facilitate travel from the United States into CMI's route system.
In July 1997, the Company entered into certain agreements with
UMDA. For a discussion of these agreements, see "Business Strategy
- - Fund the Future" above.
Foreign Carrier Alliances. Over the last decade, major United
States airlines have developed and expanded alliances with foreign
air carriers, generally involving adjacent terminal operations,
coordinated flights, code-sharing and other joint marketing
activities. Continental is the sole major United States carrier to
operate a hub in the New York City area. Consequently, managementContinental
believes the Companyit is uniquely situated to attract alliance partners from
Europe, the Far East and South America and intends tohas aggressively pursuepursued
such alliances. The Company believes that its
recently announced global alliance withthe Northwest Alliance
will enhance its ability to attract foreign alliance partners. ManagementSee
"Risk Factors Relating to Continental - Risks Regarding
Continental/Northwest Alliance".
Continental believes that developing a network of international
alliance partners will better leverage the Company's hub assets by
attracting high-yield flow traffic and by strengthening
Continental's position in large, local (non-connecting) markets and
will result in improved returns to the Company. Additionally,
Continental can enlarge its scope of service more rapidly and enter
additional markets with lower capital and start-up costs through
formation of alliances with partners as compared with entering
markets independently of other carriers.
ManagementContinental has a goal of developing alliance relationships that,
together with the Company's own flying, will permit expanded
service through Newark and Houston to major destinations in South
America, Central America, Europe and Asia. Route authorities
necessary for the Company's own service to certain of these
destinations are not currently available to the Company.
Continental has implemented international code-sharing agreements
with Alitalia Air Canada,Linee Aeree Italiane, S.P.A. ("Alitalia"), Transavia
Airlines, ("Transavia"), CSA Czech Airlines, Business Air,British Midland, China Airlines, EVA
Airways Corporation, an airline based in Taiwan, (scheduled to commence
March 30, 1998) and Virgin Atlantic
Airways ("Virgin"), which
commenced February 2, 1998.
AlitaliaViacao Aerea Sao Paulo ("VASP") and Continental code-share between pointsSociete Air
France ("Air France"), and is in the United
Statesprocess of implementing a
code-share agreement and Italy,other joint marketing and service
agreements with Alitalia placing its code onCompania Panamena de Aviacion, S.A., 49% of the
common equity of which is owned by Continental. Upon receipt of
government approval, Continental flights between Newarkwill commence code-sharing
arrangements with Aeroservicios Carabobo S.A., a Venezuelan
carrier, Avant Airlines, a Chilean carrier, and RomeAir Aruba. In
addition, the Northwest Alliance contemplates formation of a joint
venture with KLM Royal Dutch Airlines ("KLM"), a Dutch carrier.
Continental has entered into joint market agreements with Air China
and Milan and between Newark and
seven U.S. cities and Mexico City.Aerolineas Centrales de Colombia, for which government approval
has not yet been sought.
Certain of Continental's agreement with
Alitalia involves a block-space arrangement pursuantcode-sharing agreements involve block-
space arrangements (pursuant to which carriers agree to share
capacity and bear economic risk for blocks of seats on certain
routes.routes). Alitalia has agreed to purchase blocks of seats on
Continental flights between Newark and Rome and Milan. VASP has
agreed to purchase blocks of seats on Continental flights between
Newark and Rio de Janeiro and Sao Paulo. Continental and Air
France purchase blocks of seats on each other's flights between
Houston and Newark and Paris. Continental and Virgin exchange
blocks of seats on each other's flights between Newark and London.
Continental's agreement with Virgin is a code-share arrangement
containing block-space commitments involvingalso includes the carriers' Newark-
London routes andpurchase by
Continental of blocks of seats on eight other routes flown by
Virgin between the United Kingdom and the United States.
Continental and Air Canada (and its subsidiaries) continue to code-
share on six cross-border routes under agreements that expire in
April 1998, where Continental places its code on 18 Air Canada
flights per day and Air Canada places its code on six Continental
flights per day. Continental and Air Canada provide ground
handling and other services for each other at certain locations in
the United States and Canada. Continental does not anticipate
renewing its agreements with Air Canada.
In addition, the Company has also entered into joint marketing
agreements with other airlines, all of which are currently subject
to government approval. Some of these agreements will involve
block-space provisions which management believes are important to
Continental's ability to compete as an international airline. In
October 1996, Continental announced a block-space agreement with
Air France which contemplates a future code-share arrangement on
certain flights between Newark and Charles de Gaulle Airport
("CDG") and Houston and CDG. In August 1997, Continental announced
a code-share agreement with Aerolineas Centrales de Colombia
("ACES").
In connection with the Continental/Northwest alliance, subject to
government approvals, code-sharing will commence with the Company
and Northwest. See "Continental/Northwest Alliance and Related
Agreements" above. ManyThe majority of the Company's international alliance agreements provide that a
party may terminate the agreement upon a
change ofcertain changes in ownership
or control of the other party. IfAs a result of the Air Partners
Transactiontransfer by
Continental's principal stockholder of its Continental Class A
common stock to an affiliate of Northwest (which affiliate is
consummated,referred to hereafter together with Northwest as "Northwest"),
certain of the Company's international
alliance partners will have the rightcould rely on such
provision to attempt to terminate their alliance relationship with
the Company. Based on discussions with such
partners,To date, none has done so, and the Company believesdoes not
believe that none of its partners will
exercisethe Northwest transaction would provide the basis for
such right.a termination.
The Company anticipates enteringmight enter into other code-sharing, joint marketing
and block-space agreements in 1998,1999, which maymight include the Company
undertaking the financial commitment to purchase seats from other
carriers.
Employees
As of December 31, 1997,1998, the Company had approximately 39,30043,900 full-
time equivalent employees, including approximately 17,10019,200 customer
service agents, reservations agents, ramp and other airport
personnel, 7,0007,750 flight attendants, 6,3007,000 management and clerical
employees, 5,5006,150 pilots, 3,3003,650 mechanics and 100150 dispatchers.
Labor costs are a significant component of the Company's expenses
and can substantially impact airline results. In 1997,1998, labor costs
(including employee incentives) constituted 27.9%31.1% of the Company's
total operating expenses.expenses (excluding fleet disposition/impairment
loss). While there can be no assurance that the Company's
generally good labor relations and high labor productivity will
continue, management has established as a significant component of
its business strategy the preservation of good relations with the
Company's employees, approximately one-
third40% of whom are represented by
unions. In September 1997, the Company announced that it intendsa plan to bring
all employees to industry standard wages (the averageno later than the end of
the top ten air carriers as
ranked by the DOT excluding Continental) within 36 months. Such
wageyear 2000. Wage increases began in 1997, and will continue to
be phased in over the 36-month periodthrough 2000 as revenue, interest rates and rental
rates reach industry standards.
The Company estimates thatfollowing is a table of the increased wages will aggregate
approximately $500 million over the 36-month period.
In April 1997,Company's, Express's and CMI's
principal collective bargaining negotiations began with the
Independent Association of Continental Pilots ("IACP") to amend
both the Continental pilots' contract (which becameagreements, and their respective
amendable in
July 1997) and the Express pilots' contract (which became amendable
in October 1997). In February 1998, a five-year collective
bargaining agreement with the Continental Airlines pilots was
announced by the Company and the IACP. In March 1998, Express also
announced a five-year collective bargaining agreement with its
pilots. These agreements are subject to approval by the IACP board
of directors and ratification by the Continental and Express
pilots.
The Company's mechanics and related employees recently voted to be
represented by thedates:
Approximate Contract
Employee Number of Representing Amendable
Group Employees Union Date
Continental Pilots 5,050 Independent October 2002
Association
of Continental
Pilots
Express Pilots 1,100 Independent October 2002
Association
of Continental
Pilots
Dispatchers 150 Transport Workers October 2003
Union of America
Continental 3,220 International January 2002
Mechanics Brotherhood of
Teamsters
Express Mechanics 280 International (Negotiations
Brotherhood of for initial
Teamsters contract
ongoing)
CMI Mechanics 150 International March 2001
Brotherhood of
Teamsters
Continental 6,925 International December 1999
Flight Attendants Association of
Machinists and
Aerospace Workers
Express 375 International November 1999
Flight Attendants Association of
Machinists and
Aerospace Workers
CMI 450 International June 2000
Flight Attendants Association of
Machinists and
Aerospace Workers
CMI Fleet and 300 International March 2001
Passenger Service Brotherhood of
Employees Teamsters
(the
"Teamsters"). The Company does not believe that the Teamsters'
union representation will be material to the Company.
In addition, the Company's and Express's flight attendants and
dispatchers are represented by unions, as are CMI's flight
attendants, mechanics and related employees and its agent
classification employees.
The other employees of Continental, Express and CMI are not represented by unions and are not covered
by collective bargaining agreements.
Competition and Marketing
The airline industry is highly competitive and susceptible to price
discounting. The Company competes with other air carriers that
have substantially greater resources (and in certain cases, lower
cost structures) as well as smaller air carriers with low costlow-cost
structures. Overall industry profit margins have historically been
low. However, during 1995 through 1997,1998, industry profit margins
improved substantially. See Item 1. "Business. Risk Factors
Relating to the Airline Industry" and Item 7. "Management's
Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operations".
As with other carriers, most tickets for travel on Continental are
sold by travel agents. Travel agents generally receive commissions
measured by the price of tickets sold. Accordingly, airlines
compete not only with respect to the price of tickets sold, but
also with respect to the amount of commissions paid. Airlines
often pay additional commissions in connection with special revenue
programs.
In 1997,1998, Continental Airlines continued to expand its electronic
ticketing ("E-Ticket") product throughoutto international destinations. E-
Tickets result in lower distribution costs to the United States.Company while
providing enhanced customer and revenue information. Continental
recorded over $1.3$2.4 billion in E-Ticket sales in 19971998, representing
35%27% of domestictotal customers traveling with an E-Ticket
in 1997.by the end of 1998. Further
expansion in 19981999 will bring selectcomplete the offering of E-Ticket to all
international stations online,destinations, expand the number of E-Ticket machines
in major airports, and enhance the Company's ability to interline
with other carriers on a bilateral basis. The Company expects
these features to contribute to an increase in E-Ticket usage and
a further reduction in distribution costs.
Frequent Flyer Program
Each major airline has established a frequent flyer program
designed to encourage repeat travel on such carrier. Continental
sponsors a frequent flyerits system. Continental's
OnePass program ("OnePass"), which allows passengers to earn mileage credits by flying
Continental and certain other carriers such asincluding Northwest, America
West, Transavia, Alitalia and Air Canada.France. The Company also sells mileage
credits to hotels, car rental agencies, credit card companies and
others participating in the OnePass program.
Continental accrues the incremental cost associated with the earned
flight awards based on expected redemptions. The incremental cost
to transport a passenger on a free trip includes the cost of
incremental fuel, meals, telecommunications, insurance and
miscellaneous supplies and does not include any charge for
potential displacement of revenue passengers or costs for aircraft
ownership, maintenance, labor or overhead allocation. Due to the
structure of the program and the low level of redemptions as a
percentage of total travel, Continental believes that displacement
of revenue passengers by passengers using flight awards has
historically been minimal. The number of awards used on
Continental represented less than 7% of Continental's total revenue
passenger miles in each of the years 19971998 and 1996.1997.
During the fourth quarter of 1998, Continental, as part of the
Northwest Alliance, entered into a frequent flyer arrangement with
Northwest designed to allow Continental and Northwest to combine
their frequent flyer programs while continuing to administer them
as two separate programs.
Industry Regulation and Airport Access
Continental and its subsidiaries operate under certificates of
public convenience and necessity issued by the DOT. Such
certificates may be altered, amended, modified or suspended by the
DOT if public convenience and necessity so require, or may be
revoked for intentional failure to comply with the terms and
conditions of a certificate.
The airlines are also regulated by the Federal Aviation
Administration ("FAA"), primarily in the areas of flight
operations, maintenance, ground facilities and other technical
matters. Pursuant to these regulations, Continental has
established, and the FAA has approved, a maintenance program for
each type of aircraft operated by the Company that provides for the
ongoing maintenance of such aircraft, ranging from frequent routine
inspections to major overhauls. Certain regulations require phase-
out of certain aircraft and modifications to aging aircraft. Such
regulations can significantly increase costs and affect a carrier's
ability to compete.
The DOT allows local airport authorities to implement procedures
designed to abate special noise problems, provided such procedures
do not unreasonably interfere with interstate or foreign commerce
or the national transportation system. Certain airports, including
the major airports at Boston, Washington, D.C., Chicago, Los
Angeles, San Diego, Orange County and San Francisco, have
established airport restrictions to limit noise, including
restrictions on aircraft types to be used and limits on the number
of hourly or daily operations or the time of such operations. In
some instances, these restrictions have caused curtailments in
services or increases in operating costs, and such restrictions
could limit the ability of Continental to expand its operations at
the affected airports. Local authorities at other airports are
considering adopting similar noise regulations.
Several airports have recently soughtAirports from time to time seek to increase substantially the rates charged to
airlines, and the ability of airlines to contest such increases has
been restricted by federal legislation, DOT regulations and
judicial decisions. In addition, public airports generally impose
passenger facility charges ("PFC's") of up to $3 per departing or
connecting passenger. Congress has from time to time considered
legislation increasing PFC's, and the Company is unable to predict
whether PFC's will increase. With certain exceptions, these
charges are passed on to the customers.
The FAA has designated John F. Kennedy, LaGuardia, O'Hare and Wash-
ington National airports as "high density traffic airports" and has
limited the number of departure and arrival slots at those
airports. Currently, slots at the high density traffic airports
may be voluntarily sold or transferred between the carriers. The
DOT has in the past reallocated slots to other carriers and
reserves the right to withdraw slots. Various amendments to the
slot system, proposed from time to time by the FAA, members of
Congress and others, could, if adopted, significantly affect
operations at the high density traffic airports or expand slot
controls to other airports. Certain of such proposals could
restrict the number of flights, limit transfer of the ownership of
slots, increase the risk of slot withdrawals or require charges to
the Company's financial statements. The DOT recently proposed the
elimination of slot restrictions at high-density airports.
Continental cannot predict whether any of these proposals will be
adopted.
The availability of international routes to United States carriers
is regulated by treaties and related agreements between the United
States and foreign governments. The United States has in the past
generally followed the practice of encouraging foreign governments
to accept multiple carrier designation on foreign routes, although
certain countries have sought to limit the number of carriers.
Foreign route authorities may become less valuable to the extent
that the United States and other countries adopt "open skies"
policies liberalizing entry on international routes. Continental
cannot predict what laws and regulations will be adopted or their
impact, but the impact may be significant.
Many aspects of Continental's operations are subject to
increasingly stringent federal, state and local laws protecting the
environment. Future regulatory developments could adversely affect
operations and increase operating costs in the airline industry.
Risk Factors Relating to the Company
Leverage and Liquidity. Continental is more leveraged and has significantly less liquiditya higher proportion of
debt compared to its equity capital than certainsome of its competitors,
severalprincipal
competitors. In addition, a majority of whom have substantial available lines of credit and/or
significant unencumbered assets.Continental's property and
equipment is subject to liens securing indebtedness. Accordingly,
Continental may be less able than certainsome of its competitors to
withstand a prolonged recession in the airline industry and may not haveor respond
as much
flexibility to respondflexibly to changing economic conditions or to
exploit new business opportunities.and competitive conditions.
As of December 31, 1997,1998, Continental had approximately $1.9$2.7 billion
(including current maturities) of long-term debt and capital lease
obligations and had approximately $1.2$1.3 billion of Continental-
obligated mandatorily redeemable preferred securities of subsidiary
trust and common stockholders' equity. Common stockholders' equity
reflects the adjustment of Continental's balance sheet and the
recording of assets and liabilities at fair market value as of
April 27, 1993 in accordance with the American Institute of
Certified Public Accountants' Statement of Position 90-7 -
"Financial Reporting by Entities in Reorganization Under the
Bankruptcy Code". As of December 31, 1997,1998,
Continental had $1.0$1.4 billion in cash and cash equivalents (excluding restricted cash and
cash equivalents of $15 million).equivalents.
Continental has general lines of credit totaling $225 million and
significant encumbered assets.
For 1997, Continental incurred cash expenditures under operating
leases relating to aircraft of approximately $626 million, compared
to $568 million for 1996, and $236 million relating to facilities
and other rentals, compared to $210 million in 1996. Continental
expects that its operating lease expenses for 1998 will increase
over 1997 amounts. In addition,
Continental has substantial commitments for capital requirements relating to compliance with regulations that are
discussed below. See "Risk Factors Relating toexpenditures,
including for the Airline
Industry - Regulatory Matters".
In March 1998, Continental announced the conversionacquisition of 15 Boeing
737 option aircraft to 15 Boeing 737-900 firm aircraft and the
addition of 25 optionnew aircraft. As of March 18, 1998,February 8,
1999, Continental had firm commitments with Boeingagreed to take delivery ofacquire a total of 154109 Boeing jet
aircraft (including thethrough 2005. The Company anticipates taking delivery of
57 Boeing 737-900jet aircraft discussed above) during the years 1998
through 2005 within 1999. Continental also has options for
an additional 114 aircraft (exercisable subject to certain
conditions). These aircraft will replace older,
less efficient Stage 2 aircraft and allow for growth of operations. The estimated aggregate cost of the Company's firm
commitments for the Boeing aircraft is approximately $6.7$5.4 billion.
Continental currently plans to finance its new Boeing aircraft with
a combination of enhanced pass through trust certificates, lease
equity and other third-party financing, subject to availability and
market conditions. As of March 18,
1998,February 8, 1999, Continental had
completed or had third party commitments for
a total of approximately $1.6$1.1 billion in financing arranged for itssuch future
Boeing deliveries, anddeliveries. In addition, Continental had commitments or
letters of intent from
various sources for backstop financing for approximately one-thirdone-
third of the anticipated remaining acquisition cost of such Boeing
deliveries. The Company currently plans on financingIn addition, at February 8, 1999, Continental has firm
commitments to purchase 32 spare engines related to the new Boeing
aircraft for approximately $167 million, which will be deliverable
through December 2004.
As of February 8, 1999, Express had firm commitments for 37 Embraer
ERJ-145 ("ERJ-145") 50-seat regional jets and 25 Embraer ERJ-135
("ERJ-135") 37-seat regional jets, with options for an additional
125 ERJ-145 and 50 ERJ-135 aircraft exercisable through 2008.
Express anticipates taking delivery of 19 ERJ-145 and six ERJ-135
regional jets in 1999. Neither Express nor Continental will have
any obligation to take any of the firm ERJ-145 aircraft that are
not financed by a combination of enhanced equipment trust
certificates, lease equitythird party and leased to Continental.
For 1998, cash expenditures under operating leases relating to
aircraft approximated $702 million, compared to $626 million for
1997, and approximated $263 million relating to facilities and
other third party financing, subjectrentals compared to availability and market conditions. However, further$236 million in 1997. Continental
expects that its operating lease expenses for 1999 will increase
over 1998 amounts.
Additional financing will be needed to satisfy the Company's
capital commitments for
other aircraft and aircraft-related expenditures such as engines,
spare parts, simulators and related items. There can be no
assurance thatcommitments. Continental cannot predict whether sufficient
financing will be available for all
aircraft and other capital expenditures not covered by
firm financing commitments.
Deliveries of new Boeing aircraft are
expected to increase aircraft rental, depreciation and interest
costs while generating cost savings in the areas of maintenance,
fuel and pilot training.
Continental's History of Operating Losses. Although Continental recorded
net income (including special charges) of $383 million in 1998,
$385 million in 1997, $319 million in 1996 and $224 million in
1995, it had1995. However, Continental experienced significant operating
losses in the previous eight years. InHistorically, the long term,
Continental's viability depends on its ability to sustain
profitablefinancial
results of operations.the U.S. airline industry have been cyclical.
Continental cannot predict whether current industry conditions will
continue.
Aircraft Fuel. Since fuelFuel costs constitute a significant portion of
Continental's operating expense. Fuel costs (approximately 13.6% and 13.3%were approximately
10.2% of operating expenses for the yearsyear ended December 31, 19971998
(excluding fleet disposition/impairment loss) and 1996, respectively),
significant changes in fuel costs would materially affect
Continental's operating results.13.6% for the
year ended December 31, 1997. Fuel prices continue to be
susceptible toand supplies are
influenced significantly by international events,political and Continental cannot predict
near or longer-term fuel prices.economic
circumstances. Continental enters into petroleum swap contracts,
petroleum call option contracts and jet fuel purchase commitments
to provide some short-term protection (generally three to six
months) against a sharp increase in jet fuel prices. InThe Company's
fuel hedging strategy could result in the event ofCompany not fully
benefiting from certain fuel price declines. If a fuel supply
shortage resultingwere to arise from a disruption of oil imports or
otherwise, higher fuel prices or curtailment of scheduled airline
service could result. Significant changes in fuel costs would
materially affect Continental's operating results.
Labor Matters. In AprilSeptember 1997, collective bargaining agreement
negotiations began with the IACP to amend both the Continental
Airlines pilots' contract (which became amendable in July 1997) and
Express pilots' contract (which became amendable in October 1997).
In February 1998, a five-year collective bargaining agreement with
the Continental Airlines pilots was announced by the Company and
the IACP. In March 1998, Express also announced a five-year
collective bargaining agreement with its pilots. These agreements
are subject to approval by the IACP board of directors and
ratification by the Continental and Express pilots. The Company
began accruing for the increased costs of a tentative agreement
reached in November 1997 in the fourth quarter of 1997. The
Company estimates that such accrual will be approximately $113
million for 1998. Continental's mechanics and related employees
recently voted to be represented by the Teamsters. Continental
does not believe that the Teamsters' union representation will be
material to Continental. In September 1997, Continental announced
that it intendsplan to
bring all employees to industry standard wages (the averageno later than the
end of the top ten air carriers as ranked by the DOT,
excluding Continental) within 36 months. The announcement further
stated that wageyear 2000. Wage increases wouldbegan in 1997, and will
continue to be phased in over the 36-month
periodthrough 2000, as revenue, interest rates
and rental rates reach industry standards.
Continental estimates that the increased wages will
aggregate approximately $500 million over the 36-month period.
Certain Tax Matters. At December 31, 1997,1998, Continental had
estimated net operating loss carryforwards ("NOLs") of $1.7$1.1 billion
for federal income tax purposes that will expire through 2009 and
federal investment tax credit carryforwards of $45 million that
will expire through 2001. As a result of the change in ownership
of Continental on April 27, 1993, the ultimate utilization of
Continental's NOLs and investment tax credits could be limited.
Reflecting this possible limitation, Continental has recorded a
valuation allowance of $617$263 million at December 31, 1997.1998.
Continental had, as of December 31, 1997,1998, deferred tax assets
aggregating $1.1 billion,$803 million, including $631$372 million of NOLs. RealizationDuring
the first quarter of a substantial portion of1998, the Company's remaining
NOLs will require the completion by April 27, 1998 of transactions
resulting in recognition of built-in gains for federal income tax
purposes. The Company has consummated several
such transactions, resultingthe benefit of which resulted in a $62 million reduction inthe elimination of
reorganization value in excess of amounts allocable to identifiable
assets. Theassets of $164 million. During the third and fourth quarters of
1998, the Company may consummate one or moredetermined that additional built-in gain transactionsNOLs of the Company's
predecessor could be benefitted and accordingly reduced both the
valuation allowance and routes, gates and slots by April 27, 1998.$190 million.
To the extent the Company were to determine in the future that
additional NOLs of the Company's predecessor could be recognized in
the accompanying consolidated financial statements, such benefit
would further reduce routes, gates and slots.
As a result of NOLs, Continental will not pay United States federal
income taxes (other than alternative minimum tax) until it has
recordedearned approximately an additional $515 million$1.1 billion of taxable income
following December 31, 1997.1998. Section 382 of the Internal Revenue
Code ("Section 382") imposes limitations on a corporation's ability
to utilize NOLs if it experiences an "ownership change." In
general terms, an ownership change may result from transactions
increasing the ownership of certain stockholders in the stock of a
corporation by more than 50 percentage points over a three-year
period. In the event that an ownership change should occur,
utilization of Continental's NOLs would be subject to an annual
limitation under Section 382 determined by multiplying the value of
Continental's stock at the time of the ownership change by the
applicable long-term tax-exempt rate (which was 5.23%4.71% for February
1998)1999). Any unused annual limitation may be carried over to later
years, and the amount of the limitation may under certain
circumstances be increased by the built-in gains in assets held by
Continental at the time of the change that are recognized in the
five-year period after the change. Under current conditions, if an
ownership change were to occur, Continental's annual NOL
utilization would be limited to approximately $147$102 million per year
other than through the recognition of future built-in gain
transactions.
On November 20, 1998, Northwest completed its acquisition of
certain equity of the Company previously held by Air Partners, L.P.
("Air Partners") and its affiliates, together with certain Class A
common stock of the Company held by certain other investors,
totaling 8,661,224 shares of the Class A common stock (the "Air
Partners Transaction"). Based on information currently available,
the Company does not believe that the Air Partners Transaction
will resultresulted in an ownership change for purposes of Section 382.
Continental Micronesia. Because the majority of CMI's traffic
originates in Japan, its results of operations are substantially
affected by the Japanese economy and changes in the value of the
yen as compared to the dollar. Appreciation of the yen against the
dollar during 1994 and 1995 increased CMI's profitability, while a
decline of the yen against the dollar in 1996 and 1997 has reduced
CMI's profitability. As a result of the continued weaknessdevaluation of
the yen against the dollar, a weak Japanese economy and increased
fuel costs, CMI's operating earnings have declined during 1996 and 1997,1997.
Although CMI's results in Asia have declined significantly in
recent years, the Company successfully redeployed CMI capacity into
the stronger domestic markets and are not expected to improve materially absent a significant
improvement in these factors.CMI's most recent results have
improved.
To reduce the potential negative impact on CMI's dollar earnings, CMI, from time to time, purchasesthe
Company has entered into forward contracts and purchased foreign
currency average rate optionsoption contracts as a hedge against a portion
of its expected net yen cash flow position. Such
options historically have notAs of December 31,
1998, the Company had a material effect on
Continental's resultshedged approximately 100% of operations or financial condition. Any
significantits first and
sustained decrease in traffic or yields (including
due to the valuesecond quarter 1999 projected net yen-denominated cash flows and
75% of the yen) to and from Japan could materially
adversely affect Continental's consolidated profitability.its third quarter 1999 projected net yen-denominated cash
flows.
Principal Stockholder. As of December 31, 1997, Air Partners1998, Northwest held
approximately 9%13.5% of the common equity interest and 39%45.8% of the
generalfully-diluted voting power of the Company. If all the remaining warrants
held by Air Partners had been exercised on December 31, 1997,
approximately 14% of the common equity interest and 51% of the
general voting power of the Company would have been held by Air
Partners. Various provisions in the Company's Certificate of
Incorporation and Bylaws currently provide Air Partners with the
rightIn addition, Northwest
holds a limited proxy to elect one-third of the directors invote certain circumstances;
these provisions could have the effect of delaying, deferring or
preventing a change in the control of the Company. On January 26,
1998, the Company announced that Air Partners had entered into an
agreement to dispose of its interest in the Company to an affiliate
of Northwest. See Item 1. "Business - Continental/Northwest
Alliance and Related Agreements".
Risks Regarding Continental/Northwest Alliance. On January 26,
1998, the Company and Northwest announced a long-term global
alliance involving schedule coordination, frequent flyer
reciprocity, executive lounge access, airport facility
coordination, code-sharing, the formation of a joint venture among
the two carriers and KLM with respect to their respective trans-
Atlantic services, cooperation regarding other alliance partners of
the two carriers and regional alliance development, certain
coordinated sales programs, preferred reservations displays and
other activities. See Item 1. "Business - Continental/Northwest
Alliance and Related Agreements".
Successful implementation of the alliance and the achievement and
timing of the anticipated synergies by the Company are subject to
certain risks and uncertainties, some of which are beyond the
control of the Company, including (a) competitive pressures,
including developments with respect to existing and potential
future competitive alliances; (b) customer perception of and
acceptance of the alliance, including product differences and
benefits provided; (c) whether the Northwest pilots approve those
aspects of the alliance requiring their approval, and the timing
thereof; (d) potential adverse developments with respect to
regional economic performance; (e) costs or difficulties in
implementing the alliance being greater than expected, including
those caused by the Company's or Northwest's workgroups; (f)
contractual impediments to the implementation by the Company of
certain aspects of the alliance; and (g) non-approval or delay by
regulatory authorities or possible adverse regulatory decisions or
changes. There can be no assurance that the alliance will be fully
and timely implemented or continued, or that the anticipated
synergies will not be delayed or will be achieved.
Corporate Governance Agreement. The Company announced on January
26, 1998 that Air Partners, the holder of approximately 14%additional shares of the
Company's equity and approximately 51% ofcommon stock that would raise its voting power (after
giving effect to
approximately 50.3% of the exercise of warrants), had entered into an
agreement to dispose of its interest in the Company to an affiliate
of Northwest. See Item 1. "Business - Continental/Northwest
Alliance and Related Agreements".Company's fully diluted voting power.
In connection with the Air Partners Transaction, the Company has
entered into a corporate governance agreement with certain
affiliates of Northwest (the "Northwest Parties") designed to
assure the independence of the Company's board of directorsBoard and management
during the six-year periodterm of the governance agreement. During the term ofUnder the
governance agreement, as amended, the Northwest Parties have agreed
not to beneficially own voting securities of the Company in excess
of 50.1% of the fully diluted voting power of the Company's voting
securities, subject to certain exceptions, including third-party
acquisitions or tender offers for 15% or more of the voting power
of the Company's voting securities and a limited exception
permitting a one-time ownership of approximately 50.4% of the fully
diluted voting power. The Northwest Parties have deposited all
voting securities of the Company beneficially owned by Northwest and its affiliates will be
deposited intothem (other
than the shares for which they hold only a limited proxy) in a
voting trust and generallywith an independent voting trustee requiring that such
securities be voted as recommended by(i) on all matters other than the Company's boardelection of
directors, (a majority of whom must be
independent directors as defined in the agreement) or in the same proportion as the votes cast by other
holders of voting securities, and (ii) in the election of
directors, for the election of independent directors (who must
constitute a majority of the Board) nominated by the Board of
Directors. However, in the event of a merger or similar business
combination or a recapitalization, liquidation or similar
transaction, a sale of all or substantially all of the Company's
voting securities. However, pursuant to the governance agreement,
those shares may be voted as directed by the Northwest affiliate in
connection with certain matters, including with respect to mergers
and certain other change in control matters and theassets, or an issuance of capital stock representing in excess ofvoting securities that would represent
more than 20% of the voting power of the Company prior to issuance,
requiringor any amendment of the Company's charter or bylaws that would
materially and adversely affect Northwest (each, an "Extraordinary
Transaction"), the shares may be voted as directed by the Northwest
Party owning such shares, and if a stockholder vote. In
addition,third party is soliciting
proxies in connection with thean election of directors, those
shares shall be voted for the election of the independent
directors; provided that with respect to elections of directors in
respect of which any person other than the Company is soliciting
proxies, the shares may be voted at the
electionoption of Northwest's
affiliate,such Northwest Party either as recommended by the
Company's boardBoard of directorsDirectors or in the same proportion as the votes
cast by the other holders of voting securities.
The Northwest Parties have also agreed to certain restrictions on
the transfer of voting securities owned by them, have agreed not to
seek to affect or influence the Company's Board of Directors or the
control of the management of the Company or the business,
operations, affairs, financial matters or policies of the Company
or to take certain other actions, and have agreed to take all
actions necessary to cause independent directors to at all times
constitute at least a majority of the Company's Board of Directors.
The Company has granted preemptive rights to a Northwest Party with
respect to issuances of Class A common stock and certain issuances
of Class B common stock. The Northwest Parties have agreed that
certain specified actions, together with any material transactions
between the Company and Northwest or its affiliates, including any
modifications or waivers of the governance agreement or the
alliance agreement, may not be taken without the prior approval of
a majority of the Board of Directors, including the affirmative
vote of a majority of the independent directors. The governance
agreement also required the Company to adopt a shareholder rights
plan with reasonably customary terms and conditions, with an
acquiring person threshold of 15% and with appropriate exceptions
for the Northwest Parties for actions permitted by and taken in
compliance with the governance agreement. A rights plan meeting
these requirements was adopted effective November 20, 1998.
The governance agreement will expire on November 20, 2004, or if
earlier, upon the date that the Northwest Parties cease to
beneficially own voting securities representing at least 10% of the
fully diluted voting power of the Company's voting securities.
As a resultHowever, in response to concerns raised by the Department of
the
provisions of the corporate governance agreement, the ability of
the Company to engageJustice ("DOJ") in a change in control transaction other than
with Northwest or an affiliate thereof, or to issue significant
amounts of capital stock under certain circumstances, is limited.
Shareholder Litigation. Following the announcementits antitrust review of the Northwest Alliance,
the Air Partners Transaction and the related corporate governance agreement
between the Company and certain
affiliates ofthe Northwest Parties (collectively, the
"Northwest Trans-
action"Transaction"), a supplemental agreement was adopted,
which extended the effect of a number of the provisions of the
governance agreement for an additional four years. For instance,
the Northwest Parties must act to ensure that a majority of the
Company's Board is comprised of independent directors, and certain
specified actions, together with material transactions between the
Company and Northwest or its affiliates, including any
modifications or waivers of the supplemental agreement or the
alliance agreement, may not be taken without the prior approval of
a majority of the Board of Directors, including the affirmative
vote of a majority of the independent directors. The Northwest
Parties will continue to have the right to vote in their discretion
on any Extraordinary Transaction during the supplemental period,
but also will be permitted to vote in their discretion on other
matters up to 20% of the outstanding voting power (their remaining
votes to be cast neutrally, except in a proxy contest, as
contemplated in the governance agreement), subject to their
obligation set forth in the previous sentence. If, during the term
of the supplemental agreement, the Company's rights plan were
amended to allow certain parties to acquire more shares than is
currently permitted, or if the rights issued thereunder were
redeemed, the Northwest Parties could vote all of their shares in
their discretion. Certain transfer limitations are imposed on the
Northwest Parties during the supplemental period. The Company has
granted preemptive rights to a Northwest Party with respect to
issuances of Class A common stock and certain issuances of Class B
common stock that occur during such period. The Company has agreed
to certain limitations upon its ability to amend its charter,
bylaws, executive committee charter and rights plan during the term
of the supplemental agreement. Following the supplemental period,
the supplemental agreement requires the Northwest Parties to take
all actions necessary to cause Continental's Board to have at least
five independent directors, a majority of whom will be required to
approve material transactions between Continental and Northwest or
its affiliates, including the amendment, modification or waiver of
any provisions of the supplemental agreement or the alliance
agreement.
In certain circumstances, particularly in cases where a change in
control of the Company could otherwise be caused by another party,
Northwest could exercise its voting power so as to delay, defer or
prevent a change in control of the Company.
Risks Regarding Continental/Northwest Alliance. In November 1998,
the Company and Northwest began implementing a long-term global
alliance involving extensive code-sharing, frequent flyer
reciprocity, and other cooperative activities.
Continental's ability to implement the Northwest Alliance
successfully and to achieve the anticipated benefits is subject to
certain risks and uncertainties, including (a) disapproval or delay
by regulatory authorities or adverse regulatory developments; (b)
competitive pressures, including developments with respect to
alliances among other air carriers; (c) customer reaction to the
alliance, including reaction to differences in products and
benefits provided by Continental and Northwest; (d) economic
conditions in the principal markets served by Continental and
Northwest; (e) increased costs or other implementation
difficulties, including those caused by employees; (f)
Continental's ability to modify certain contracts that restrict
certain aspects of the alliance; and (g) the outcome of lawsuits
commenced by certain stockholders of Continental challenging the
Northwest Transaction and certain related matters.
The alliance agreement provides that if after four years the
Company has not entered into a code share with KLM or is not
legally able (but for aeropolitical restrictions) to enter into a
new trans-Atlantic joint venture with KLM and Northwest and place
its airline code on certain Northwest flights, Northwest can elect
to (i) cause good faith negotiations among the Company, KLM and
Northwest as to the impact, if any, on the contribution to the
joint venture resulting from the absence of the code share, and the
Company will reimburse the joint venture for the amount of any loss
until it enters into a code share with KLM, or (ii) terminate
(subject to cure rights of the Company) after one year's notice any
or all of such alliance agreement and any or all of the agreements
contemplated thereunder.
On October 23, 1998, the DOJ filed a lawsuit against Northwest and
Continental challenging Northwest's acquisition of an interest in
Continental. The DOJ did not seek to preliminarily enjoin the
transaction before it closed on November 20, 1998, nor is the DOJ
challenging the Northwest Alliance at this time, although the DOJ
has informed the parties that it continues to investigate certain
specific aspects of the alliance. Continental is in the process of
implementing its alliance with Northwest. While it is not possible
to predict the ultimate outcome of this litigation, management does
not believe that this litigation will have a material adverse
effect on Continental.
The DOT is reviewing the changes in Continental's ownership
pursuant to DOT procedures for confirming the continuing fitness of
airlines when their ownership changes. In connection with this
review, DOT has exempted Continental and Northwest from regulatory
provisions which DOT has interpreted to require approval for de
facto route transfers when one airline holding international route
authority acquires control of another airline holding international
route authority, and has deferred action until December 10, 1999 as
to its review of the governance and other agreements between
Continental and Northwest to determine whether there has been a de
facto route transfer.
If DOT were to conclude that a de facto route transfer of
Continental routes to Northwest were occurring, it would institute
a proceeding to determine whether such a transfer was in the public
interest. In the past, DOT has approved numerous transfers, but it
has also concluded on occasion that certain overlapping routes in
limited-entry markets should not be transferred. In those
instances, DOT has decided those routes should instead become
available to other airlines to enhance competition on overlapping
routes or between two countries. Continental and Northwest operate
overlapping flights on certain limited entry routes, and
Continental and Northwest offer service between their primary U.S.
hubs and various other countries. If DOT were to institute a route
transfer proceeding, it could consider whether certain of
Continental's international routes overlapping with Northwest's on
a point-to-point or country-to-country basis should be transferred
to Northwest or to another airline. Continental believes that
Northwest has not acquired control of Continental, and that there
is a significant question as to DOT's authority to apply a de facto
route transfer theory to the current relationship between Northwest
and Continental. Continental would vigorously oppose any attempt
by DOT to institute a route transfer proceeding which would
consider any reductions in Continental's route authorities.
Stockholder Litigation. Following the announcement of the
Northwest Transaction, to the Company's knowledge as of MarchFebruary 1,
1998,1999, six separate lawsuits werehad been filed against the Company and
its Directors and certain other parties (the "Shareholder"Stockholder
Litigation"). The complaints in the ShareholderStockholder Litigation, which
were filed in the Court of Chancery of the State of Delaware in and
for New Castle County and seek class certification, and which have
been consolidated under the caption In re Continental Airlines,
Inc. Shareholder Litigation, generally allege that the Company's
Directors improperly accepted the Northwest Transaction in
violation of their fiduciary duties owed to the public shareholdersstockholders
of the Company. They further allege that Delta Air Lines, Inc.
submitted a proposal to purchase the Company which, in the
plaintiffs' opinion, was superior to the Northwest Transaction.
The ShareholderStockholder Litigation seeks, inter alia, to enjoin the
Northwest Transaction and the award of unspecified damages to the
plaintiffs.
While there can be no assurance that the ShareholderStockholder Litigation
will not result in a delay in the implementation of any aspect of
the Northwest Transaction, or the enjoining of the Northwest
Transaction, the Company believes the ShareholderStockholder Litigation to be
without merit and intends to defend it vigorously.
Year 2000 Computer Risk. The Year 2000 issue arises as a result of
computer programs having been written using two digits (rather than
four) to define the applicable year, among other problems. Any
information technology ("IT") systems that have time-sensitive
software might recognize a date using "00" as the year 1900 rather
than the year 2000, which could result in miscalculations and
system failures. The problem also extends to many "non-IT"
systems; that is, operating and control systems that rely on
embedded chip systems. In addition, the Company is at risk from
Year 2000 failures on the part of third-party suppliers and
governmental agencies with which the Company interacts.
The Company uses a significant number of computer software programs
and embedded operating systems that are essential to its
operations. For this reason, the Company implemented a Year 2000
project in late 1996 so that the Company's computer systems would
function properly in the year 2000 and thereafter. The Company's
Year 2000 project involves the review of a number of internal and
third-party systems. Each system is subjected to the project's
five phases which consist of systems inventory, evaluation and
analysis, modification implementation, user testing and integration
compliance. The systems are currently in various stages of
completion. The Company anticipates completing its review of
systems in the second quarter of 1999 and believes that, with
modifications to its existing software and systems and/or
conversions to new software, the Year 2000 issue will not pose
significant operational problems for its computer systems.
The Company has also initiated communications and on-site visits
with its significant suppliers, vendors and governmental agencies
with which its systems interface and exchange data or upon which
its business depends. The Company is coordinating efforts with
these parties to minimize the extent to which its business may be
vulnerable to their failure to remediate their own Year 2000
problems. The Company's business is dependent upon certain
domestic and foreign governmental organizations or entities such as
the FAA that provide essential aviation industry infrastructure.
There can be no assurance that the systems of such third parties on
which the Company's business relies (including those of the FAA)
will be modified on a timely basis. The Company's business,
financial condition or results of operations could be materially
adversely affected by the failure of its equipment or systems or
those operated by other parties to operate properly beyond 1999.
Although the Company currently has day-to-day operational
contingency plans, management is in the process of updating these
plans for possible Year 2000-specific operational requirements.
The Company anticipates completing the revision of current
contingency plans and the creation of additional contingency plans
by September 1999. In addition, the Company will continue to
monitor third-party (including governmental) readiness and will
modify its contingency plans accordingly. While the Company does
not currently expect any significant modification of it operations
in response to the Year 2000 issue, in a worst-case scenario the
Company could be required to alter its operations significantly.
Risks Factors Relating to the Airline Industry
Competition and Industry Conditions and Competition.Conditions. The airline industry is
highly competitive and susceptible to price discounting. Continental has in the past both respondedCarriers
have used discount fares to discounting actions
taken by other carriersstimulate traffic during periods of
slack demand, to generate cash flow and initiated significant discounting
actions itself.to increase market share.
Some of Continental's competitors include carriers withhave substantially greater
financial resources (and in certain cases,or lower cost structures), as well as smaller carriers with lower cost
structures.structures than Continental.
Airline profit levels are highly sensitive to and
during recent years have been severely impacted by, changes in fuel
costs, fare levels (or "average yield") and passenger demand. Passenger demandsdemand and yieldsfare
levels have in the past been affectedinfluenced by, among other things, the
general state of the economy (both in international regions and
domestically), international events, airline capacity and pricing
actions taken by carriers. Domestically, from 1990 to 1993, the
weak U.S. economy, turbulent international events and actions takenextensive
price discounting by carriers with respect to fares. From 1990 to
1993, these factors contributed to unprecedented losses
for U.S. airlines. In the domestic airline industry's
incurring unprecedented losses. Although fare levels have
increased subsequently, fuel costs have also increased
significantly.last several years, the U.S. economy has
improved and excessive price discounting has abated. Continental
cannot predict the extent to which these industry conditions will
continue.
In addition, significant industry-wide discounts
could be reimplemented at any time, and the introduction of broadly
available, deeply discounted fares by a major United States airline
would likely result in lower yields for the entire industry and
could have a material adverse effect on Continental's operating
results.
The airline industry has consolidated in past years as a result of
mergers and liquidations and may further consolidate in the future.
Among other effects, such consolidation has allowed certain of
Continental's major competitors to expand (in particular) their
international operations and increase their market strength.
Furthermore, the emergence in recent years, of several new carriers,
typically with low cost structures, has further increased the
competitive pressures on the major United States airlines. In many
cases,U.S. airlines have sought to form
marketing alliances with other U.S. and foreign air carriers. Such
alliances generally provide for "code-sharing", frequent flyer
reciprocity, coordinated scheduling of flights of each alliance
member to permit convenient connections and other joint marketing
activities. Such arrangements permit an airline to market flights
operated by other alliance members as its own. This increases the
new entrantsdestinations, connections and frequencies offered by the airline,
which provide an opportunity to increase traffic on its segment of
flights connecting with its alliance partners. The Northwest
Alliance is an example of such an arrangement, and Continental has
existing alliances with numerous other air carriers. Other major
U.S. airlines have initiatedalliances or triggered price
discounting. Aircraft, skilled laborplanned alliances more extensive
than Continental's. Continental cannot predict the extent to which
it will benefit from its alliances or be disadvantaged by competing
alliances.
Regulatory Matters. Airlines are subject to extensive regulatory
and gates at most airports
continue to be readily available to start-up carriers. Competition
with new carriers or other low cost competitors on Continental's
routes could negatively impact Continental's operating results.
Regulatory Matters.legal compliance requirements that engender significant costs.
In the last several years, the FAA has issued a number of
maintenance directives and other regulations relating to the maintenance and
operation of aircraft that have required significant expenditures.
Some FAA requirements cover, among other things, retirement of
older aircraft, security measures, collision avoidance systems,
airborne windshear avoidance systems, noise abatement, commuter
aircraft safety and increased inspections and maintenance
procedures to be conducted on older aircraft. Continental expects
to continue incurring expenses for
the purpose ofin complying with the FAA's
noise, aging aircraft and
other regulations. In addition, several airports have recently
sought to increase substantially the rates charged to airlines, and
the ability of airlines to contest such increases has been
restricted by federal legislation, DOT regulations and judicial
decisions.
Management believes that Continental benefitted significantly from
the expiration of the aviation trust fund tax (the "ticket tax") on
December 31, 1995. The ticket tax was reinstated on August 27,
1996, expired again on December 31, 1996 and was reinstated again
on March 7, 1997. In July 1997, Congress passed tax legislation
reimposing and significantly modifying the ticket tax. The
legislation includes the imposition of new excise tax and segment
fee tax formulas to be phased in over a multi-year period, an
increase in the international departure tax and the imposition of
a new arrivals tax, and the extension of the ticket tax to cover
items such as the sale of frequent flyer miles. Management
believes that the ticket tax has a negative impact on Continental,
although neither the amount of such negative impact directly
resulting from the reimposition of the ticket tax, nor the benefit
previously realized by its expiration, can be precisely determined.
Additional laws, regulations, taxes and regulationsairport rates and charges
have been proposed from time to time that could significantly
increase the cost of airline operations by imposing additional requirements or restrictions on
operations. Lawsreduce revenues.
Congress and regulationsthe DOT have also been considered that
would prohibit or restrictproposed the regulation of airlines'
competitive responses and other activities, including ticketing
practices and the treatment of customers. Restrictions on the
ownership and/orand transfer of airline routes orand takeoff and landing
slots. Also, the availabilityslots have also been proposed. The ability of
international routes to United States
carriers to operate international routes is regulated by
treaties and related agreementssubject to change
because the applicable arrangements between the United States and
foreign governments thatmay be amended from time to time, or because
appropriate slots or facilities are amendable.not made available.
Continental cannot predict
what laws, regulations and amendments may be adopted or their
impact, and there can be noprovide assurance that laws or regulations and
amendments currently proposed or
enacted in the future will not adversely affect Continental.it.
Seasonal Nature of Airline Business. Due to the greater demand for
air travel during the summer months, revenue in the airline
industry in the third quarter of the year is generally
significantly greater than revenue in the first quarter of the year
and moderately greater than revenue in the second and fourth
quarters of the year for the majority of air carriers.
Continental's results of operations generally reflect this
seasonality, but have also been impacted by numerous other factors
that are not necessarily seasonal, including the extent and nature
of competition from other airlines, fare wars, excise and similar
taxes, changing levels of operations, fuel prices, foreign currency
exchange rates and general economic conditions.
Other
While the Company has implemented a Year 2000 project to ensure
that its computer systems will function properly in the year 2000
and thereafter (see Item 7. "Management's Discussion and Analysis
of Financial Condition and Results of Operations"), the Company's
business is dependent upon certain governmental organizations or
entities, such as the FAA, that provide essential aviation industry
infrastructure. There can be no assurance that the systems of such
third parties (including those of the FAA) will be modified to
function properly in the year 2000 on a timely basis. The
Company's business, financial condition or results of operations
could be materially adversely affected by the failure of systems
operated by other parties to operate properly beyond 1999. To the
extent possible, the Company will be developing and executing
contingency plans designed to allow continued operation in the
event of failure of third parties' systems.
ITEM 2. PROPERTIES.
Flight Equipment
As shown in the following table, Continental's (including CMI's)
jet aircraft fleet (excluding regional jets) consisted of 337363 jets
and was comprised of 1113 different types and series of aircraft at
December 31, 1997.1998.
Seats
Total in Standard Average Age
Type Aircraft Owned Leased Configuration (In Years)
Four Engine
747-200* 4 - 43 1 2 426 25.025.9
Three Engine
DC-10-10 5 - 5 287 26.1
DC-10-30 31 6 - 6 287 25.2
DC-10-3025 242 22.8
727-200* 32 4 28 6 22 242 21.7
727-200* 43 4 39 149 21.122.4
Two Engine
777-200 6 1 5 283 0.2
737-800 15 - 15 155 0.4
737-700 16 - 16 124 0.5
757-200 23 - 2332 5 27 183 2.42.6
737-500 50 1 4967 15 52 104 2.42.7
737-300 65 14 51 128 10.411.4
737-200* 16 162 2 - 100 28.5
737-100* 5 5 - 95 29.5
MD-80 69 15 5417 52 141 13.014.0
DC-9-30* 2820 3 2517 103 25.7
337 64 273 14.426.8
363 68 295 11.6
*Stage 2 (noise level) aircraft (excluding five 727 aircraft
operated by CMI) which are scheduled to be replaced prior to the
year 2000.
The table above excludes six all-cargo 727 CMI aircraft.aircraft and one
A300 and one 747 Continental aircraft that were removed from
service in 1995 and 1998, respectively.
A majority of the aircraft and engines owned by Continental are
subject to mortgages.
The FAA has adopted rules pursuant to the Airport Noise and
Capacity Act of 1990 that require a scheduled phase outphase-out of Stage 2
aircraft during the 1990's.1990s. As a result of Continental's
acquisition of a number of new aircraft and the retirement of older
Stage 2 aircraft in recent years, 71.5%84.3% of Continental's current
jet fleet was composed of Stage 3 aircraft at December 31, 1997.1998.
The Company plans to retire the remainder of its Stage 2 jet fleet
(excluding thosefive 727 aircraft operated by CMI) prior to the year
2000 in order to comply with such rules. Scheduled deliveries of
the Company's new Boeing aircraft on order are expected to reduce
the average age of the Company's jet fleet (excluding regional
jets) from 14.411.6 years to 9.88.6 years by the end of 1999.
During 1997,1998, Continental took delivery of a total of 2065 new Boeing
aircraft which consisted of 14sixteen 737-500 aircraft, sixteen 737-
700 aircraft, seventeen 737-800 aircraft, ten 757-200 aircraft and
six 757-200
aircraft. In addition, Continental also purchased three DC-10-30
aircraft and leased seven DC-10-30777-200 aircraft. The Company anticipates taking delivery of
6457 new Boeing aircraft in 1998.1999.
As of December 31, 1997,1998, Express operated a fleet of 116127 aircraft,
as follows:
Seats
Total in Standard Average Age
Type Aircraft Owned Leased Configuration (In Years)
Turboprop
ATR-72 3 3 - 64 3.44.4
ATR-42-320 30 3 27 46 7.98.9
ATR-42-500 8 - 8 48 1.32.3
EMB-120 32 2226 16 10 30 8.49.2
Beech 1900-D 25 25 - 19 1.92.9
Regional jets
ERJ-145* 18ERJ-145 35 - 1835 50 0.5
116 53 63 5.01.0
127 47 80 5.1
*One regional jet was damaged beyond economic repair in February
1998.
Not included in theThe table above isexcludes one ATR-42 aircraft owned by the Company
and currently leased to a third party.party and six EMB-120s owned by the
Company but removed from service for remarketing. On January 26,
1999, one such EMB-120 was sold.
During 1997,1998, Express took delivery of 1618 ERJ-145 aircraft. Express
anticipates taking delivery of another 18 new ERJ-145 aircraft and six
new ERJ-135 aircraft in 1998.1999.
See Item 7. "Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial
Condition and Results of Operations - Liquidity and Capital
Commitments" for a discussion of the Company's order for new firm
commitment aircraft and related financing arrangements.
Facilities
The Company's principal facilities are located at Newark, International, Bush
Intercontinental in Houston, Hopkins International in Cleveland and
A.B. Won Pat International Airport in Guam. All these facilities,
as well as substantially all of Continental's other facilities, are
leased on a long-term, net-rental basis, and Continental is
responsible for maintenance, taxes, insurance and other facility-
related expenses and services. In certain locations, Continental
owns hangars and other facilities on land leased on a long-term
basis, which facilities will become the property of the lessor on
termination of the lease. At each of its three domestic hub cities
and most other locations, Continental's passenger and baggage
handling space is leased directly from the airport authority on
varying terms dependent on prevailing practice at each airport.
In July 1996, the Company announced plans to expand its gates and
related facilities into Terminal B at Bush Intercontinental, as
well as planned improvements at Terminal C and the construction of
a new automated people mover system linking Terminal B and Terminal
C. In April 1997 and January 1999, the City of Houston completed
the offering of $190 million and $46 million, respectively,
aggregate principal amount of tax-exempt special facilities revenue
bonds (the "IAH Bonds"). The IAH Bonds are unconditionally
guaranteed by Continental. In connection therewith, the Company
has entered into long-term leases (or amendments to existing
leases) with the City of Houston providing for the Company to make
rental payments sufficient to service the related tax-exempt bonds,
which have a term no longer than 30 years. The majority of the
Company's expansion and improvements at Bush Intercontinental are
expected to be completed during the summer of 1999.
In 1998, the Company is buildingbuilt a wide-body aircraft maintenance hangar
in Honolulu, Hawaii at an estimatedapproximate cost of $25 million. Construction
of the hangar, anticipated to be completed by the second quarter of
1998, is beingThe
construction was financed by tax-exempt special facilities revenue
bonds issued by the State of Hawaii. In connection therewith, the
Company has entered into long-term leases providing for the Company
to make rental payments sufficient to service the related tax-
exempt bonds.
In December 1997,1998, Continental substantially completed construction of a new hangar and
improvements to a cargo facility at Newark
International.Newark. Continental expects to completecompleted
the financing of these projects in April 1998 with approximately $25$23 million of
tax-
exempt bonds.tax-exempt bonds issued by the New Jersey Economic Development
Authority. Continental is also planning a major facility expansion
at Newark which wouldwill require, among other matters, agreements to be
reached with the applicable airport authority.authority and significant tax-
exempt bond financing for the project.
Continental has announced plans to expandcommenced the expansion of its facilities at
Hopkins International, which expansion is expected to be completed
in the third quarter of 1999. The expansion, which will include a
new jet concourse for the regional jet service offered by Express,
as well as other facility improvements, is expected to cost
approximately $156 million and will beis being funded principally by the issuance of a
combination of tax-exempt special facilities revenue bonds (issued
in March 1998) and general airport revenue bonds (issued in
December 1997) by the City of Cleveland. In connection therewith,
Continental has entered into a long-term lease with the City of
Cleveland under which rental payments will be sufficient to service
the related bonds.
The Company has lease agreements with the City and County of Denver
covering ten gates and several support facilities at Denver
International Airport. The gates and facilities exceed
Continental's needs at the airport and the Company has subleased a
portion of the space.
The Company has cargo facilities at Los Angeles International
Airport. In July 1996, the Company subleased such facilities to
another carrier. If such carrier fails to comply with its
obligations under the sublease, the Company would be required to
perform those obligations.
CMI operates a hub on the island of Guam. In September 1996, the
Guam International Airport Authority completed the first phase of
a $240 million airport terminal expansion and renovation project.
This provided new arrival facilities, inbound baggage carousels and
customs halls and increased the number of gates available to CMI
from six to 12. Upon completion of theThe second (and final) phase of the project was
completed in August 1998,November 1998. This added five new additional gates, will be
added, includingadditional
ticket counters and a new pier-sort outbound baggage system. The
completed project is expected to tripletripled the size of the terminal complex and increase the cost of CMI's
operations in Guam by approximately $15 million a year.complex.
Continental also maintains administrative offices, airport and
terminal facilities, training facilities and other facilities
related to the airline business in the cities it serves.
Continental remains contingently liable until December 1, 2015, on
$202 million of long-term lease obligations of US Airways related
to the East End Terminal at LaGuardia Airport in New York. If US
Airways defaulted on these obligations, Continental could be
required to cure the default, at which time it would have the
right to reoccupy the terminal.
ITEM 3. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS.
PlanAntitrust Litigation
United States of Reorganization
The Company's Plan of Reorganization, which became effective on
April 27, 1993, upon emergence from bankruptcy (the "Plan of
Reorganization")America v. Northwest Airlines Corp. & Continental
Airlines, Inc., providesin the United States District Court for the
full paymentEastern District of all allowed
administrativeMichigan, Southern Division. In this
litigation, the Antitrust Division of the Department of Justice is
challenging under Section 7 of the Clayton Act and priority claims. Pursuant toSection 1 of the
PlanSherman Act the acquisition by Northwest of
Reorganization, holders of allowed general unsecured claims are
entitled to participate in a distribution of 3,800,000 shares of the Company'sContinental's
Class A common stock 10,084,736bearing, together with certain shares for
which Northwest has a limited proxy, more than 50% of the Company's Class B common stock,fully
diluted voting power of all Continental stock. The government's
position is that, notwithstanding various agreements that severely
restrict Northwest's ability to exercise voting control over
Continental and $6,523,952are designed to assure Continental's competitive
independence, Northwest's control of cash and have no
further claim against the Company. The Plan of Reorganization
provides for this distribution to be issued initially in trust to
a distribution agent and thereafter for distributions to be made
from the trust from time to time as disputed claims are resolved.
The distribution agent must reserve from each partial distribution
of stock or cash to allow a complete pro rata distribution to be
made to each holder of a disputed claim in the event such claim is
eventually allowed, unless the United States Bankruptcy Court for
the District of Delaware (the "Bankruptcy Court") establishes a
lower reserve or estimates the claim at a lesser amount for
purposes of distribution. As of December 31, 1997, there remained
581,355 shares of Class A common stock 1,520,827 shareswill
reduce actual and potential competition in various ways and in a
variety of Class B
commonmarkets. Continental believes that because of
agreements restricting Northwest's right to exercise control over
Continental, the companies remain independent competitors;
Northwest's stock acquisition was made solely for investment
purposes and approximately $972,000thus is expressly exempt under Section 7 of cash availablethe
Clayton Act; and Northwest's stock acquisition was necessary in
order for distribution.Northwest and Continental to enter into an alliance
agreement that is highly pro-competitive. The government seeks an
order requiring Northwest to divest all voting stock in Continental
on terms and cash set aside for distributionconditions as may be agreed to prepetition unsecured creditors was fixed inby the Plan of
Reorganizationgovernment and
will not change as claims are allowed. However,
a limited number of proceedings were brought by prepetition
creditors seeking to impose additional obligations on the Company.Court. No specific relief is sought against Continental.
Environmental Proceedings
Under the federal Comprehensive Environmental Response,
Compensation and Liability Act of 1980, as amended (commonly known
as "Superfund") and similar state environment cleanup laws,
generators of waste disposed of at designated sites may, under
certain circumstances, be subject to joint and several liability
for investigation and remediation costs. The Company (including
its predecessors) has been identified as a potentially responsible
party at four federal and two state sites that are undergoing or
have undergone investigation or remediation. The Company believes
that, although applicable case law is evolving and some cases may
be interpreted to the contrary, some or all of any liability claims
associated with these sites were discharged by confirmation of the
Company's Plan of Reorganization, principally because the Company's
exposure is based on alleged offsite disposal known as of the date
of confirmation. Even if any such claims were not discharged, on
the basis of currently available information, the Company believes
that its potential liability for its allocable share of the cost to
remedy each site (to the extent the Company is found to have
liability) is not, in the aggregate, material; however, the Company
has not been designated a "de minimis" contributor at any of such
sites.
The Company is also involved in other environmental matters,
including the investigation and/or remediation of environmental
conditions at properties used or previously used by the Company.
Although the Company is not currently subject to any environmental
cleanup orders imposed by regulatory authorities, it is undertaking
voluntary investigation or remediation at certain properties in
consultation with such authorities. The full nature and extent of
any contamination at these properties and the parties responsible
for such contamination have not been determined, but based on
currently available information, the Company does not believe that
any environmental liability associated with such properties will
have a material adverse effect on the Company.
ShareholderStockholder Litigation
Following the announcement of the Northwest Alliance, the Air
Partners Transaction, and the related corporate governance agreement
between the Company and certain affiliates of Northwest
(collectively, the "Northwest Transaction"), to the
Company's knowledge as of MarchFebruary 1, 1998,1999, six separate lawsuits
werehad been filed against the Company and its Directors and certain
other parties
(the "Shareholder Litigation").parties. The complaints in the ShareholderStockholder Litigation, which
were filed in the Court of Chancery of the State of Delaware in and
for New Castle County and seek class certification, and which have
been consolidated under the caption In re Continental Airlines,
Inc. Shareholder Litigation, generally allege that the Company's
Directors improperly accepted the Northwest Transaction in
violation of their fiduciary duties owed to the public shareholdersstockholders
of the Company. They further allege that Delta Air Lines, Inc.
submitted a proposal to purchase the Company which, in the
plaintiffs' opinion, was superior to the Northwest Transaction.
The ShareholderStockholder Litigation seeks, inter alia, to enjoin the
Northwest Transaction and the award of unspecified damages to the
plaintiffs.
While there can be no assurance that the ShareholderStockholder Litigation
will not result in a delay in the implementation of any aspect of
the Northwest Transaction, or the enjoining of the Northwest
Transaction, the Company believes the ShareholderStockholder Litigation to be
without merit and intends to defend it vigorously.
General
Various other claims and lawsuits against the Company are pending
that are of the type generally consistent with the Company's
business. The Company cannot at this time reasonably estimate the
possible loss or range of loss that could be experienced if any of
the claims were successful. Typically, such claims and lawsuits
are covered in whole or in part by insurance. The Company does not
believe that the foregoing matters will have a material adverse
effect on the Company.
ITEM 4. SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS.
Not applicable.
PART II
ITEM 5. MARKET FOR REGISTRANT'S COMMON EQUITY AND RELATED
STOCKHOLDER MATTERS.
Continental's common stock trades on the New York Stock Exchange.
The table below shows the high and low sales prices for the
Company's Class A common stock and Class B common stock as reported
on the New York Stock Exchange during 19961997 and 1997.1998.
Class A Class B
Common Stock Common Stock
High Low High Low
19961997 First Quarter . . . 33-3/4 27 19-1/33-5/8 28-3/16 19-7/1627
Second Quarter. . . 31-1/36-3/4 30-1/8 35-7/8 29-1/2
Third Quarter . . . 41-7/16 25-7/34 41-3/8 31-7/34
Fourth Quarter. . . 50-1/2 38-1/2 50-3/16 26-9/38-5/8
1998 First Quarter . . . 64-1/4 47-3/4 62-1/16 44
Second Quarter. . . 64-1/2 55-3/4 64 54-1/16
Third Quarter . . . 31 21 31-1/64-3/4 36-1/2 65-1/8 21-1/835-3/4
Fourth Quarter. . . 30-5/43-5/16 30-7/8 22 30-3/4 22-5/8
1997 First Quarter . . . 33-3/4 27 33-5/8 27
Second Quarter. . . 36-3/4 30-1/8 35-7/8 29-1/2
Third Quarter . . . 41-7/42-13/16 34 41-3/8 34
Fourth Quarter. . . 50-1/2 38-1/2 50-3/16 38-5/28-7/8
As of March 11, 1998,February 17, 1999, there were approximately 3,1332,953 and 17,95615,494
holders of record of Continental's Class A common stock and Class B
common stock, respectively.
The Company has paid no cash dividends on its common stock.
Because management believes it is important to continue
strengthening the Company's balance sheet and liquidity, the
Company has no current intention of paying cash dividends on its
common stock, but may considerstock. During 1998, the Company's Board of Directors
authorized the expenditure of up to $300 million to repurchase
shares of itsthe Company's Class A and Class B common stock under
certain market conditions.or
securities convertible into Class B common stock. As of February
17, 1999, the Company has repurchased 4,952,700 Class B common
shares for $240 million. Certain of the Company's credit
agreements and indentures restrict the ability of the Company and
certain of its subsidiaries to pay cash dividends by imposing
minimum unrestricted cash requirements on the Company, limiting the
amount of such dividends when aggregated with certain other
payments or distributions and requiring that the Company comply
with other covenants specified in such instruments.
The Company's Certificate of Incorporation provides that no shares
of capital stock may be voted by or at the direction of persons who
are not United States citizens unless such shares are registered on
a separate stock record. The Company's Bylaws further provide that
no shares will be registered on such separate stock record if the
amount so registered would exceed United States foreign ownership
restrictions. United States law currently requires that no more
than 25% of the voting stock of the Company (or any other domestic
airline) may be owned directly or indirectly by persons who are not
citizens of the United States.
ITEM 6. SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA.
The table on the following page sets forth certain consolidated
financial data of (i) the Company at December 31, 1997, 1996, 1995,
1994 and 1993 and for the years ended December 31,1998, 1997, 1996,
1995 and 1994 and for each of the five years in the period April 28, 1993 throughended
December 31, 1993
and (ii) the Predecessor Company (see "1993 Reorganization" below),
for the period January 1, 1993 through April 27, 1993 (in millions,
except per share data).
1993 Reorganization
As used on the following page, the term "Reorganized Company"
refers to Continental Airlines, Inc. and its subsidiaries. The
Company reorganized under Chapter 11 of the federal bankruptcy code
in April 1993, after having filed for protection in December 1990.
Pursuant to the Reorganization, Continental Airlines Holdings, Inc.
(together with its subsidiaries, "Holdings" or the "Predecessor
Company"), which had been the Company's parent, merged with and
into the Reorganized Company.
As a result of the adoption of fresh start reporting in accordance
with SOP 90-7, upon consummation of the Company's Plan of
Reorganization (see Item 3. "Legal Proceedings - Plan of
Reorganization"), the consolidated financial statements of the
Predecessor Company and the Reorganized Company have not been
prepared on a consistent basis of accounting and are separated by
a vertical black line. The Reorganized Company includes
Continental CRS Interests, Inc. (formerly System One Information
Management, Inc. prior to April 27, 1995) and other businesses that
had been consolidated with Holdings prior to April 28, 1993 (but
not with pre-reorganized Continental).1998.
ITEM 6. SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA (Continued)
Predecessor
Reorganized Company (1)(2)(3) Company (2)
April 28, January 1,
1993 through 1993 through
Year Ended December 31, December 31, April 27,(1)(2)
1998 1997 1996 1995 1994
1993 1993
Operating revenue. . . . . . $7,951 $7,213 $6,360 $5,825 $5,670
$3,910 $1,857
Operating income (loss). . . 701 716 525 385 (11)
95 (114)
Income (loss) before
extraordinary gain
(loss)charge . . . . . . . .387 389 325 224 (613) (39) (979)
Net income (loss). . . . . . 383 385 319 224 (613) (39) 2,640
Earnings (loss) per
common share:
Income (loss) before
extra-
ordinary loss.extraordinary charge . .6.40 6.72 5.87 4.07 (11.88)
(1.17) *
Net income (loss). . . . 6.34 6.65 5.75 4.07 (11.88) (1.17) *
Earnings (loss) per common
share assuming dilution:
Income (loss) before
extra-
ordinary loss.extraordinary charge . .5.06 5.03 4.25 3.37 (11.88)
(1.17) *
Net income (loss). . . . 5.02 4.99 4.17 3.37 (11.88) (1.17) *
*Not meaningful.
ITEM 6. SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA (Continued)
Reorganized CompanyDecember 31, (1)
December 31,1998 1997 1996 1995 1994 1993
Total assets . . . . . . . . . . . $7,086 $5,830 $5,206 $4,821 $4,601 $5,099
Debt and capital lease obligations
in default (4)(3) . . . . . . . . . - - - - 490 -
Long-term debt and capital lease
obligations. . . . . . . . . . . 2,480 1,568 1,624 1,658 1,202
1,775
Minority interest (5)(4). . . . . . . - - 15 27 26 22
Continental-Obligated Mandatorily
Redeemable Preferred Securities
of Subsidiary Trust holding
solely Convertible Subordinated
Debentures (6)(5) . . . . . . . . . 111 242 242 242 -
-
Redeemable preferred stock (7)(6) . . - - 46 41 53 47
(1) See Item 7. "Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results
of Operations - Results of Operations" for a discussion of significant transactions in
1998, 1997, 1996 and 1995. 1998 results include a $122 million fleet disposition/
impairment charge resulting from the Company's decision to accelerate the retirement of
certain jet and turboprop aircraft. 1996 results include a $128 million fleet
disposition charge associated with the Company's decision to accelerate the replacement
of certain aircraft
between August 1997its DC-9-30, DC-10-10, 727-200, 737-100 and December 1999. The fleet disposition charge relates primarily
to (i) the writedown of Stage 2 aircraft inventory to its estimated fair value and (ii)
a provision for costs associated with the return of leased aircraft at the end of their
respective lease terms.737-200 aircraft. 1995 results include
a $108 million gain ($30 million after taxes) from the System One transactions. 1994
results include a provision of $447 million associated with the planned early retirement
of certain aircraft and closed or underutilized airport and maintenance facilities and
other assets.
(2) No cash dividends were paid on common stock during the periods shown.
(3) The earnings per share amounts prior to 1997 have been restated as required to comply
with Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 128 - "Earnings Per Share" ("SFAS
128"). For further discussion of earnings per share and the impact of SFAS 128, see the
notes to the consolidated financial statements beginning on page F-14.
(4) The Company's failure to make certain required payments in 1994 to certain lenders and
aircraft lessors constituted events of default under the respective agreements with such
parties. These events of default were cured in 1995.
(5)(4) Continental purchased UMDA's 9% interest in AMIAir Micronesia, Inc. in 1997.
See Item 1. "Business -
Business Strategy - Fund the Future".
(6)(5) The sole assets of the Continental-Obligated Mandatorily Redeemable Preferred Securities
of Subsidiary Trust ("Trust") are Convertible Subordinated Debentures, with an aggregateDebentures. In 1998,
approximately $134 million principal amount of $250 million, which bear interest atsuch Preferred Securities converted into
shares of Class B common stock, and in January 1999, the rateremainder of 8-1/2% per annum
and mature on December 1, 2020. Upon repayment, the Trust will be mandatorily redeemed.
(7)such Preferred
Securities converted into shares of Class B common stock.
(6) Continental redeemed for cash all of the outstanding shares of its Series A 12%
Cumulative Preferred Stock in 1997. See Item 1. "Business - Business Strategy - Fund
the Future".
ITEM 7. MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL
CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS.
The following discussion may contain forward-looking statements.
In connection therewith, please see the cautionary statements
contained in Item 1. "Business - Risk Factors Relating to the
Company" and "Business - Risk Factors Relating to the Airline
Industry" which identify important factors that could cause actual
results to differ materially from those in the forward-looking
statements. Hereinafter, the terms "Continental" and the "Company"
refer to Continental Airlines, Inc. and its subsidiaries, unless
the context indicates otherwise.
Continental's results of operations are impacted by seasonality
(the second and third quarters are generally stronger than the
first and fourth quarters) as well as numerous other factors that
are not necessarily seasonal, including the extent and nature of
competition from other airlines, fare sale activities, excise and
similar taxes, changing levels of operations, fuel prices, foreign
currency exchange rates and general economic conditions. To date,
the recent turmoil in the world's financial markets has not had a
material adverse impact on the Company's results of operations,
although the Company has experienced yield degradations in domestic
and certain international markets. Although the results in Asia of
Continental Micronesia, Inc. ("CMI"), a wholly owned subsidiary of
the Company, have declined in recent years, the Company
successfully redeployed CMI capacity into stronger domestic markets
and CMI's recent results have improved. In addition, the Company
believes it is well positioned to respond to market conditions in
the event of a sustained economic downturn for the following
reasons: underdeveloped hubs with strong local traffic; a flexible
fleet plan; a strong cash balance, a $225 million unused revolving
credit facility and a well developed alliance network.
Results of Operations
The following discussion provides an analysis of the Company's
results of operations and reasons for material changes therein for
the three years ended December 31, 1998.
Comparison of 1998 to 1997. The Company recorded consolidated net
income of $383 million and $385 million for the years ended
December 31, 1998 and 1997 (including special charges),
respectively. Net income in 1998 was significantly impacted by a
$77 million ($122 million before taxes) fleet
disposition/impairment loss resulting from the Company's decision
to accelerate the retirement of certain jet and turboprop aircraft.
Management believes that the Company benefitted in the first
quarter of 1997 from the expiration of the aviation trust fund tax
(the "ticket tax"). The ticket tax was reinstated on March 7,
1997. Management believes that the ticket tax has a negative
impact on the Company, although neither the amount of such negative
impact directly resulting from the reimposition of the ticket tax,
nor the benefit realized by its previous expiration, can be
precisely determined.
Passenger revenue increased 10.6%, $706 million, during 1998 as
compared to 1997. The increase was due to a 12.5% increase in
revenue passenger miles, partially offset by a 2.6% decrease in
yield. The decrease in yield was due to lower industry-wide fare
levels and an 8% increase in average stage length.
Cargo and mail increased 6.6%, $17 million, due to an increase in
freight revenue resulting from strong international volumes and
strong growth in Continental's express delivery service.
Other operating revenue increased 5.1%, $15 million, due to an
increase in revenue related to the Company's frequent flyer program
("OnePass").
Wages, salaries and related costs increased 22.3%, $404 million,
during 1998 as compared to 1997, primarily due to an 11.2% increase
in average full-time equivalent employees to support increased
flying and higher wage rates resulting from the Company's decision
to increase employee wages to industry standards by the year 2000.
Aircraft fuel expense decreased 17.9%, $158 million, in 1998 as
compared to the prior year. The average price per gallon decreased
25.6% from 62.91 cents in 1997 to 46.83 cents in 1998. This
reduction was partially offset by a 9.6% increase in the quantity
of jet fuel used principally reflecting increased capacity.
Aircraft rentals increased 19.6%, $108 million, during 1998 as
compared to 1997, due primarily to the delivery of new leased
aircraft.
Maintenance, materials and repairs increased 8.4%, $45 million,
during 1998 as compared to 1997. Aircraft maintenance expense in
the second quarter of 1997 was reduced by $16 million due to the
reversal of reserves that were no longer required as a result of
the acquisition of 10 aircraft previously leased by the Company.
In addition, maintenance expense increased due to the overall
increase in flight operations offset by newer aircraft and the
volume and timing of engine overhauls as part of the Company's
ongoing maintenance program.
Depreciation and amortization expense increased 15.7%, $40 million,
in 1998 compared to 1997 primarily due to the addition of new
aircraft and related spare parts. These increases were partially
offset by an approximate $18 million reduction in the amortization
of reorganization value in excess of amounts allocable to
identifiable assets and routes, gates and slots resulting from the
recognition of previously unbenefitted net operating losses
("NOLs").
On August 11, 1998, Continental announced that CMI plans to
accelerate the retirement of its four Boeing 747 aircraft by April
1999 and its remaining thirteen Boeing 727 aircraft by December
2000. The Boeing 747s will be replaced by DC-10-30 aircraft and
the Boeing 727 aircraft will be replaced with a reduced number of
Boeing 737 aircraft. In addition, Continental Express, Inc.
("Express"), a wholly owned subsidiary of the Company, will
accelerate the retirement of certain turboprop aircraft by December
2000, including its fleet of 32 Embraer 120 ("EMB-120") turboprop
aircraft, as regional jets are acquired to replace turboprops. As
a result of its decision to accelerate the retirement of these
aircraft, Continental recorded a fleet disposition/impairment loss
of $77 million ($122 million before taxes) in the third quarter of
1998.
Other operating expense increased 10.5%, $157 million, in 1998 as
compared to the prior year, primarily as a result of increases in
passenger and aircraft servicing expense, reservations and sales
expense and other miscellaneous expense, primarily due to the 10.6%
increase in available seat miles.
Interest expense increased 7.2%, $12 million, due to an increase in
long-term debt resulting from the purchase of new aircraft.
Interest capitalized increased 57.1%, $20 million, due to increased
capital spending and a higher average balance of purchase deposits
for flight equipment.
The Company's other nonoperating income (expense) in 1998 included
a $6 million gain on the sale of America West Holdings Corporation
("America West Holdings") stock.
Comparison of 1997 to 1996. The Company recorded consolidated net
income of $385 million and $319 million for the years ended
December 31, 1997 and 1996, respectively, including a $128$77 million
fleet disposition chargeloss ($77128 million afterbefore taxes) in 1996 and
after-tax extraordinary lossescharges relating to the early
extinguishment of debt of $4 million and $6 million in 1997 and
1996, respectively. Management believes that the Company
benefitted in the first three quarters of 1996 and in the first
quarter of 1997 from the expiration of the aviation trust fundticket tax (the "ticket
tax") on December
31, 1995 and December 31, 1996, respectively. The ticket tax was
reinstated on August 27, 1996 and again on March 7, 1997.
Management believes that the ticket tax has a negative impact on
the Company, although neither the amount of such negative impact
directly resulting from the reimposition of the ticket tax, nor the
benefit realized by its expiration, can be precisely determined.
Additionally, the Company benefitted in the first six months of
1996 from the recognition of previously unbenefitted post-reorganization net operating loss carryforwards ("NOLs").post-
reorganization NOLs.
Passenger revenue increased 13.4%, $789 million, during 1997
compared to 1996. The increase was due to a 14.3% increase in
revenue passenger miles on capacity growth of 9.9% offset by a 1.1%
decrease in yield.
Cargo and mail revenue increased 13.6%11.2%, $21$26 million, during 1997
compared to 1996 due to an increase in cargo capacity and mail
volumes, primarily in international markets.
Mail and other
Other operating revenue increased 12.8%14.8%, $43$38 million, from 1996 to
1997 primarily as a result of an increase in mail volumes
(principally in international markets) and an increase in other
revenue related to
frequent flyer mileage credits sold to participating partners in
the Company's frequent flyer program
("OnePass").
OnePass program.
Wages, salaries and related costs increased 16.3%17.1%, $236$265 million,
during 1997 as compared to 1996 due in part to ana 9.6% increase in
the average number of full-time equivalent employees from
approximately 34,300 for the year ended December 31, 1996 to 37,600
for the year ended December 31, 1997. Wages and salaries also
increased in 1997 due to a $29 million accrual for the impact of
the tentative collective bargaining agreement with the pilots.
Employee incentives increased 29.9%, $29 million, from 1996 to 1997
as a result ofpilots and
an increase in employee profit sharingincentives of $37
million offset by a decrease in on-time bonuses of $8$29 million.
Aircraft fuel expense increased 14.3%, $111 million, from 1996 to
1997 primarily due to a 10.5% increase in the quantity of jet fuel
used from 1.228 billion gallons during 1996 to 1.357 billion
gallons during 1997, resulting from increased flying. In addition,
the average price per gallon, net of fuel hedging gains of $65
million in 1996, increased 3.3% from 60.9 cents in 1996 to
62.9 cents in 1997.
Commissions expense increased 11.2%, $57 million, in 1997 compared
to 1996, primarily due to increased passenger revenue.
Aircraft rentals increased 8.3%, $42 million, from 1996 to 1997,
primarily as a result of the delivery of new aircraft throughout
1997, net of retirements.
Commissions expense increased 11.2%, $57 million, in 1997 compared
to 1996, primarily due to increased passenger revenue.
Maintenance, materials and repairs increased 16.5%, $76 million,
during 1997 as compared to 1996, principally due to the volume and
timing of engine overhauls, increase in component costs and routine
maintenance as part of the Company's ongoing maintenance program.
Aircraft maintenance expense was reduced by $16 million in 1997 due
to the reversal of reserves that are no longer required as a result
of the acquisition of 10 aircraft previously leased by the Company.
Other rentals and landing fees increased 12.9%, $45 million, during
1997 compared to 1996 due to higher facilities rentals and landing
fees resulting from increased operations.
During the third quarter of 1996, the Company recorded a fleet
disposition chargeloss of $128$77 million ($77128 million afterbefore taxes),
related primarily to (i) the writedown of Stage 2 aircraft
inventory to its estimated fair value; and (ii) a provision for
costs associated with the return of leased aircraft at the end of
their respective lease terms.
Other operating expense increased 14.9%, $194 million, in 1997 as
compared to 1996, primarily as a result of increases in passenger
services, advertising and publicity, reservations and sales expense
and other miscellaneous expense.
Interest income increased 30.2%, $13 million, in 1997 compared to
the prior year principally due to an increase in the average
invested balance of cash and cash equivalents.
Interest capitalized increased $30 million in 1997 compared to 1996
as a result of higher average purchase deposits for flight
equipment resulting from the pending acquisition of new aircraft.
Interest income increased 30.2%, $13 million, in 1997 compared to
the prior year principally due to an increase in the average
invested balance of cash and cash equivalents.
Other nonoperating income (expense) for the year ended December 31,
1996 included an $18 million gain related to the sale of America
West Airlines, Inc. ("America West")Holdings common stock and warrants.
The income tax provision for the year ended December 31, 1997 and
1996 of $237 million and $86 million, respectively, consists of
federal, state and foreign income taxes. During the second quarter
of 1996, the Company had fully utilized previously unbenefitted
post-reorganization NOLs, and began accruing income tax expense.
Comparison of 1996 to 1995. The Company recorded consolidated net
income of $319 million and $224 million for the years ended
December 31, 1996 and 1995, respectively, including a $128 million
fleet disposition charge ($77 million after taxes) and a $6 million
after-tax extraordinary loss relating to the early extinguishment
of debt in 1996. Continental's financial and operating performance
improved significantly in 1996 compared to 1995, reflecting, among
other things, continued implementation of the Company's strategic
program to enhance the fundamentals of its operations, rationalize
capacity, improve customer service and employee relations and
strengthen its balance sheet and liquidity. Management believes
that the Company benefitted significantly from the expiration of
the ticket tax on December 31, 1995, although the amount of any
such benefit directly resulting from the expiration of the ticket
tax cannot precisely be determined. The ticket tax was reinstated
on August 27, 1996, and expired again on December 31, 1996.
Implementation of the Company's route realignment and capacity
rationalization initiatives increased capacity by 0.8% in 1996 as
compared to 1995. This increase in capacity, combined with a 4.7%
increase in traffic, produced a 2.5 percentage point increase in
load factor to 68.1%. This higher load factor, combined with a
4.7% increase in the average yield per revenue passenger mile,
contributed to a 10.7% increase in passenger revenue to $5.9
billion in 1996.
Mail and other revenue decreased 11.4%, $43 million, from 1995 to
1996 primarily as a result of a series of transactions entered into
with a former subsidiary, System One Information Management, Inc.
("System One") (which were effective April 27, 1995). See Note 11
of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements. Partially
offsetting such decrease was an increase in other revenue resulting
from a wet lease agreement with Alitalia, an agreement with DHL
International to operate a sorting and distribution hub in Manila
and an increase in revenue related to frequent flyer mileage
credits sold to participating partners in the Company's OnePass
program.
Wages, salaries and related costs increased 5.1%, $71 million,
during 1996 as compared to 1995 due in part to an increase in the
average number of full-time equivalent employees from approximately
33,700 for the year ended December 31, 1995 to approximately 34,300
for the year ended December 31, 1996. The increase is also
attributable to pay increases effective July 1, 1996 for
Continental's jet pilots and substantially all of its non-unionized
employees and an increase in base wages and per diem payments for
flight attendants resulting from the Company's collective
bargaining agreement with the International Association of
Machinists and Aerospace Workers ("IAM") representing Continental's
flight attendants.
Employee incentives increased $46 million from 1995 to 1996
primarily due to an increase in employee profit sharing of $37
million and an increase in on-time bonuses of $9 million.
Aircraft fuel expense increased 13.7%, $93 million, from 1995 to
1996. The average price per gallon, net of fuel hedging gains of
$65 million in 1996, increased 10.7% from 55.0 cents in 1995 to
60.9 cents in 1996. In addition, there was a 2.1% increase in the
quantity of jet fuel used from 1.203 billion gallons during 1995 to
1.228 billion gallons during 1996, principally reflecting increased
capacity.
Commissions expense increased 4.3%, $21 million, in 1996 compared
to 1995, primarily due to a 10.7% increase in passenger revenue,
partially offset by a decrease in the percentage of commissionable
revenue.
Aircraft rentals increased 2.4%, $12 million, from 1995 to 1996,
primarily as a result of the delivery of new aircraft throughout
1996. Such increase was partially offset by retirements of certain
leased aircraft and refinancings of certain leased aircraft.
Maintenance, materials and repairs increased 7.5%, $32 million,
during 1996 as compared to 1995, principally due to the volume and
timing of engine overhauls as part of the Company's ongoing
maintenance program.
During the third quarter of 1996, the Company made the decision to
accelerate the replacement of 30 DC-9-30 aircraft, six DC-10-10
aircraft, 31 727-200 aircraft, 13 737-100 aircraft and 17 737-200
aircraft between August 1997 and December 1999. As a result of its
decision to accelerate the replacement of these aircraft, the
Company recorded a fleet disposition charge of $128 million ($77
million after taxes). The fleet disposition charge relates
primarily to (i) the writedown of Stage 2 aircraft inventory, which
is not expected to be consumed through operations, to its estimated
fair value; and (ii) a provision for costs associated with the
return of leased aircraft at the end of their respective lease
terms.
Interest expense decreased 22.5%, $48 million, from 1995 to 1996,
primarily due to principal reductions of long-term debt and capital
lease obligations as a result of the Company's refinancing
initiatives.
Interest income increased 38.7%, $12 million, in 1996 compared to
1995, principally due to an increase in the average invested
balance of cash and cash equivalents.
The Company's other nonoperating income (expense) for the year
ended December 31, 1996 includes a $13 million gain related to the
sale of approximately 1.4 million shares of America West common
stock, a $5 million gain related to the sale of the America West
warrants and foreign currency gains and losses (primarily related
to the Japanese yen and the British pound).
Nonoperating income (expense) for the year ended December 31, 1995
primarily consisted of a pre-tax gain of $108 million from the
System One transactions. Additionally in 1995, the bankruptcy
court approved a settlement resolving certain claims filed by the
Company for the return of certain aircraft purchase deposits. As
a result of the settlement, the Company recorded a $12 million gain
in 1995, included in other nonoperating income (expense). These
gains were partially offset by an additional provision of $14
million for underutilized airport facilities and other assets
(primarily associated with Denver International Airport) and a
$5 million pretax charge which represented a waiver fee to a major
creditor of the Company.
The income tax provision for the year ended December 31, 1996 of
$86 million consists of federal, state and foreign income taxes.
During 1996, the Company utilized previously unbenefitted NOLs,
created subsequent to the Company's 1993 emergence from bankruptcy,
and began accruing income tax expense in the second quarter. A
provision for federal income taxes was recorded for the year ended
December 31, 1995 related to the System One transactions. No
additional provision was recorded in 1995 due to the previously
incurred NOLs for which a tax benefit had not previously been
recorded.
Certain Statistical Information
An analysis of statistical information for Continental's jet
operations, excluding regional jets operated by Continental
Express, for each
of the three years in the period ended December 31, 19971998 is as
follows:
Net Increase/ Net Increase/
(Decrease) (Decrease)
1998 1998-1997 1997 1997-1996 1996 1996-1995 1995
Revenue pas-
senger miles
(millions) (1). .53,910 12.5 % 47,906 14.3 % 41,914
4.7 % 40,023
Available seat
miles
(millions) (2). .74,727 10.6 % 67,576 9.9 % 61,515
0.8 % 61,006
Passenger load
factor (3). . . .72.1% 1.2 pts. 70.9% 2.8 pts. 68.1% 2.5 pts. 65.6%
Breakeven pas-
senger load
factor (4), (11)(5). 61.4% 1.4 pts. 60.0% (0.7)pts. 60.7% (0.1)pts. 60.8%
Passenger revenue
per available
seat mile
(cents) (5) . . . . . 9.10 (1.0)% 9.19 2.9 % 8.93 8.9 % 8.20
Total revenue per
available seat
milesmile (cents)
(6) . . . . . . .9.98 (1.1)% 10.09 3.0 % 9.80 8.6 % 9.02
Operating cost
per available
seat mile
(cents) (7),
(11)(5). . . . . . .8.93 (1.5)% 9.07 3.4 % 8.77 4.9 % 8.36
Average yield
per revenue
passenger mile
(cents) (8)(6). . . 12.62 (2.6)% 12.96 (1.1)% 13.10
4.7 % 12.51
Average fare per
revenue
passengerpassenger. . . . .$150.63$155.95 3.53% $150.63 5.1 % $143.27
7.6 % $133.21
Revenue passengers
(thousands). . . 43,625 5.9 % 41,210 7.5 % 38,332 2.0 % 37,575
Average length of
aircraft flight
(miles). . . . . 1,044 8.0 % 967 7.9 % 896 7.2 % 836
Average daily
utilization of
each aircraft
(hours) (9) (7). . . 10:13 0.0 % 10:13 2.3 % 9:59 4.7 % 9:32
Actual aircraft
in fleet at end
of period (10)(8). . 363 7.7 % 337 6.3 % 317 2.6 % 309
_______________
Continental has entered into block space arrangements with certain
other carriers whereby one or both of the carriers is obligated to
purchase capacity on the other carrier. One such arrangement began
in June 1997 pursuant to which the other carrier is sharing
Continental's costs of operating certain flights by committing to
purchase capacity on such flights.other. The tablestable above excludeexcludes 1.9
billion and 738 million available seat miles, in 1997, as well as thetogether with related
revenue passenger miles and enplanements, which wereoperated by Continental
but purchased and marketed by the other carrier.carrier in 1998 and 1997,
respectively, and includes 358 million available seat miles,
together with related revenue passenger miles and enplanements,
operated by other carriers but purchased and marketed by
Continental in 1998.
(1) The number of scheduled miles flown by revenue passengers.
(2) The number of seats available for passengers multiplied by
the number of scheduled miles those seats are flown.
(3) Revenue passenger miles divided by available seat miles.
(4) The percentage of seats that must be occupied by revenue
passengers in order for the airline to break even on an
income before income taxes basis, excluding nonrecurring
charges, nonoperating items and other special items.
(5) Passenger revenue divided by available seat miles.1998 excludes a fleet disposition/impairment loss totaling
$122 million and 1996 excludes a fleet disposition loss
totaling $128 million.
(6) Total revenue divided by available seat miles.
(7) Operating expenses divided by available seat miles.
(8) The average revenue received for each mile a revenue
passenger is carried.
(9)(7) The average number of hours per day that an aircraft flown in
revenue service is operated (from gate departure to gate
arrival).
(10)(8) Excludes sixall-cargo 727 aircraft (six in 1998 and 1997 and
four all-cargo 727 CMI aircraft in 1997 and
1996, respectively.
(11) 1996 excludes fleet disposition charge totaling $128 million.1996) at CMI.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
During 19971998 and early 1998,1999, the Company completed a number of
transactions intended to strengthen its long-term financial
position and enhance earnings:
- - In March 1997, ContinentalFebruary 1998, the Company completed an offering of $707$773
million of pass-through certificates to be used to finance (through
either leveraged leases or secured debt financings) the debt
portion of the acquisition cost of up to 30 new aircraft from The
Boeing Company ("Boeing") scheduled to be delivered to
Continental through April 1998.
- - In April 1997, Continental entered into a $160 million secured
revolving credit facility to be used for the purpose of making
certain predelivery payments to Boeing for new Boeing aircraft to
be delivered through December 1999.
- - In April 1997, Continental redeemed for cash all of the 460,247
outstanding shares of its Series A 12% Cumulative Preferred Stock
held by an affiliate of Air Canada for $100 per share plus
accrued dividends thereon. The redemption price, including
accrued dividends, totaled $48 million.
- - In June 1997, Continental purchased from Air Partners, L.P. ("Air
Partners") for $94 million in cash warrants to purchase 3,842,542
shares of Class B common stock of the Company.
- - In June 1997, Continental completed an offering of $155 million
of pass-through certificates which were used to finance the
acquisition of 10 aircraft previously leased by the Company.
- - In July 1997, Continental entered into a $575 million credit
facility, including $350 million of term loans, $275 million of
which was loaned by Continental to its wholly owned subsidiary
Air Micronesia, Inc. ("AMI"), reloaned by AMI to its wholly owned
subsidiary, Continental Micronesia, Inc. ("CMI") and used by CMI
to repay its existing secured term loan. The facility also
includes a $225 million revolving credit facility.
- - In July 1997, the Company (i) purchased (a) the right of United
Micronesia Development Association's ("UMDA") to receive future
payments under a services agreement between UMDA and CMI and (b)
UMDA's 9% interest in AMI, (ii) terminated the Company's
obligations to UMDA under a settlement agreement entered into in
1987, and (iii) terminated substantially all of the other
contractual arrangements between the Company, AMI and CMI, on the
one hand, and UMDA on the other hand, for an aggregate
consideration of $73 million.
- - In September 1997, Continental completed an offering of $89
million of pass-through certificates which were used to finance
the debt portion of the acquisition cost of nine Embraer ERJ-145
("ERJ-145") regional jets.
- - In October 1997, the Company completed an offering of $752
million of pass-through certificates to be used to finance
(through either leveraged leases or secured debt financings) the
debt portion of the acquisition cost of up to 24 new Boeing
aircraft scheduled to be delivered from April 1998 through
November 1998.
- - In February 1998, the Company completed an offering of $773
million of pass-through certificates to be used to finance
(through either leveraged leases or secured debt financings) the
debt portion of the acquisition cost of up to 24 aircraft
scheduled to be delivered from
February 1998 through December 1998.
- - In addition, during 1997 andDuring the first quarter of 1998, Continental completed several
offerings totaling approximately $291$98 million aggregate principal
amount of tax-exempt special facilities revenue bonds to finance
or refinance certain airport facility projects. These bonds are
payable solely from rentals paid by Continental under long-term
lease agreements with the respective governing bodies.
- - In April 1998, the Company completed an offering of $187 million
of pass-through certificates used to refinance the debt related
to 14 aircraft currently owned by Continental.
- - During the fourth quarter of 1998, the Company completed an
offering of $524 million of pass-through certificates to be used
to finance (through either leveraged leases or secured debt
financings) the debt portion of the acquisition cost of up to 14
aircraft scheduled to be delivered from December 1998 through May
1999.
- - In November 1998, the Company exercised its right and called for
redemption approximately half of its outstanding 8-1/2%
Convertible Trust Originated Preferred Securities ("TOPrS"). The
TOPrS were convertible into shares of Class B common stock at a
conversion price of $24.18 per share of Class B common stock. As
a result of the call for redemption, 2,688,173 TOPrS were
converted into 5,558,649 shares of Class B common stock. In
December 1998, the Company called for redemption the remaining
outstanding TOPrS. As a result of the second call, the remaining
2,298,327 TOPrS were converted into 4,752,522 shares of Class B
common stock during January 1999.
- - In December 1998, the Company sold $200 million principal amount
of 8% unsecured senior notes due in December 2005. The proceeds
will be used for general corporate purposes.
- - In February 1999, the Company completed an offering of $806
million of pass-through certificates to be used to finance
(through either leveraged leases or secured debt financings) the
debt portion of the acquisition cost of up to 22 aircraft
scheduled to be delivered from March 1999 through September 1999.
At the direction of an independent trustee, the cash proceeds from
the pass-through certificate transactions are deposited with a depositary bank for the benefit of the
certificate holdersan
escrow agent and enable the Company to finance (through either
leveraged leases or secured debt financings) the debt portion of
the acquisition cost of new aircraft. As of March 18,
1998February 8, 1999,
approximately $1.6$1.1 billion of the proceeds remain on deposit. If
any funds remain as deposits at the end of the specified delivery
periods, such funds will be distributed back to the certificate
holders.
As of December 31, 1997,1998, Continental had approximately $1.9$2.7 billion
(including current maturities) of long-term debt and capital lease
obligations, and had approximately $1.2$1.3 billion of Continental-
obligated mandatorily redeemable preferred securities of subsidiary
trust and common stockholders' equity, a ratio of 2.1 to 1,
compared to 1.6 to 1.1 at December 31, 1997.
As of December 31, 1996, the ratio of long-term debt and capital lease
obligations (including current maturities) to minority interest,
Continental-obligated mandatorily redeemable preferred securities
of subsidiary trust, redeemable preferred stock and common
stockholders' equity was 2.1 to 1.
As of December 31, 19971998, the Company had $1.0$1.4 billion in cash and
cash equivalents (excluding restricted cash), compared to $985
million$1.0
billion as of December 31, 1996.1997. Net cash provided by operating
activities increased $129decreased $80 million during the year ended December 31,
19971998 compared to the same period in the prior year principallyprimarily due to
an improvementincrease in operating income.accounts receivable due to increased operations.
Net cash used by investing activities for the year ended December
31, 19971998 compared to the same period in the prior year increased
$406$41 million, primarily as a result of higher capital and fleet-relatedfleet-
related expenditures in 1997 and lower1998 offset by higher purchase deposits
refunded in connection with aircraft delivered in 1996.1998. Net cash
usedprovided by financing activities increased $80$474 million primarily
due to (i) a decrease in payments on long-term debt and capital lease
obligations (ii) a decreaseand an increase in proceeds received from the issuance
of long-term debt and (iii) an increase in warrants purchased in
1997.debt.
Continental has general lines of credit totaling $225 million, and
significant encumbered assets.
Deferred Tax Assets. The Company had, as of December 31, 1997,
deferred tax assets aggregating $1.1 billion, including
$631 million of NOLs. The Company recorded a valuation allowance
of $617 million against such assets as of December 31, 1997.
Realization of a substantial portion ofDuring the Company's remaining
NOLs will require the completion by April 27, 1998 of transactions
resulting in recognition of built-in gains for federal income tax
purposes. In the fourthfirst quarter of 1997,1998, the Company
determined
that it would be able to recognize an additional $155 millionconsummated several transactions, the benefit of NOLs attributable towhich resulted in
the Company's pre-bankruptcy predecessor.
This benefit, $62 million, was used to reduceelimination of reorganization value in excess of amounts
allocable to identifiable assets.assets of $164 million. During the third
and fourth quarters of 1998, the Company determined that additional
NOLs of the Company's predecessor could be benefited and
accordingly reduced both the valuation allowance and routes, gates
and slots by $190 million. To the extent the Company were to
determine in the future that additional NOLs of the Company's
pre-bankruptcy predecessor could be recognized in the accompanying consolidated
financial statements, such benefit would alsofurther reduce reorganization value in excessroutes,
gates and slots. As of amounts
allocable to identifiable assets. If such reorganization value is
exhausted, such benefit would decrease other intangibles. TheDecember 31, 1998, the Company may consummate one or more additional built-in gain
transactions by April 28, 1998.had deferred
tax assets aggregating $803 million, including $372 million of
NOLs, and a valuation allowance of $263 million.
As a result of NOLs, the Company will not pay United States federal
income taxes (other than alternative minimum tax) until it has
recorded approximately an additional $515 million$1.1 billion of taxable income
following December 31, 1997.1998. Section 382 of the Internal Revenue
Code ("Section 382") imposes limitations on a corporation's ability
to utilize NOLs if it experiences an "ownership change". In
general terms, an ownership change may result from transactions
increasing the ownership of certain stockholders in the stock of a
corporation by more than 50 percentage points over a three-year
period. In the event that an ownership change should occur,
utilization of Continental's NOLs would be subject to an annual
limitation under Section 382 determined by multiplying the value of
the Company's stock at the time of the ownership change by the
applicable long-term tax exempt rate (which was 5.23%4.71% for February
1998)1999). Any unused annual limitation may be carried over to later
years, and the amount of the limitation may under certain
circumstances be increased by the built-in gains in assets held by
the Company at the time of the change that are recognized in the
five-year period after the change. Under current conditions, if an
ownership change were to occur, Continental's annual NOL
utilization would be limited to approximately $147$102 million per year
other than through the recognition of future built-in gain
transactions.
On November 20, 1998, an affiliate of Northwest Airlines, Inc.
("Northwest") completed its acquisition of certain equity of the
Company previously held by Air Partners, L.P. ("Air Partners") and
its affiliates, together with certain Class A common stock of the
Company held by certain other investors, totaling 8,661,224 shares
of the Class A common stock (the "Air Partners Transaction").
Based on information currently available, the Company does not
believe that the Air Partners agreement to dispose of its interest
in the Company to an affiliate of Northwest Airlines, Inc. will
resulttransaction resulted in an ownership
change for purposes of Section 382.
See
Item 7. "Management's Discussion and Analyses - Liquidity and
Capital Resources - Other".
Purchase Commitments. In March 1998, Continental announcedhas substantial commitments for
capital expenditures, including for the conversionacquisition of 15 Boeing 737 option aircraft to 15 Boeing 737-900
firm aircraft and the addition of 25 optionnew
aircraft. As of March
18, 1998,February 8, 1999, Continental had firm commitments with Boeingagreed to
take
delivery ofacquire a total of 154109 Boeing jet aircraft (including thethrough 2005. The
Company anticipates taking delivery of 57 Boeing 737-
900jet aircraft described above) during the years 1998 through 2005
within
1999. Continental also has options for an additional 61114 aircraft
(exercisable subject to certain conditions). These aircraft will replace older, less
efficient Stage 2 aircraft and allow for growth of operations. The estimated
aggregate cost of the Company's firm commitments for the
Boeing
aircraft is approximately $6.7$5.4 billion. Continental currently
plans to finance its new Boeing aircraft with a combination of
enhanced pass through trust certificates, lease equity and other
third party financing, subject to availability and market
conditions. As of March 18,
1998,February 8, 1999, Continental had completed or had third party commitments for
a total of approximately
$1.6$1.1 billion in financing arranged for itssuch future Boeing
deliveries, and haddeliveries. In addition, Continental has commitments or letters of
intent from
various sources for backstop financing for approximately one-third of the
anticipated remaining acquisition cost of such Boeing deliveries.
The Company currently plans on financingIn addition, at February 8, 1999, Continental has firm commitments
to purchase 32 spare engines related to the new Boeing aircraft with a combination of enhanced equipment trust
certificates, lease equity and other third party financing, subject
to availability and market conditions. However, furtherfor
approximately $167 million which will be deliverable through
December 2004. Additional financing will be needed to satisfy the
Company's capital commitments for other aircraft and aircraft-relatedaircraft-
related expenditures such as engines, spare parts, simulators and
related items. There can be no assurance that sufficient financing
will be available for all aircraft and other capital expenditures
not covered by firm financing commitments. Deliveries of new
Boeing aircraft are expected to increase aircraft rental,
depreciation and interest costs while generating cost savings in
the areas of maintenance, fuel and pilot training.
In September 1996, ContinentalAs of February 8, 1999, Express Inc.had firm commitments for 37 Embraer
ERJ-145 ("Express"ERJ-145") placed an
order forregional jets and 25 firm ERJ-145Embraer ERJ-135 ("ERJ-
135") regional jets, with options for an additional 175125 ERJ-145 and
50 ERJ-135 aircraft exercisable through 2008. In June 1997,
Express exercised its option to order 25anticipates
taking delivery of such option aircraft19 ERJ-145 and expects to confirm its order for an additional 25 of its
remaining 150 option aircraft by August 1998.six ERJ-135 regional jets in
1999. Neither Express nor Continental will have any obligation to
take suchany of the firm ERJ-145 aircraft that are not financed by a
third party and leased to the Company. Express
took delivery of 18 of the aircraft through December 31, 1997 and
will take delivery of the remaining 32 aircraft through the third
quarter of 1999. The Company expects to account for all of these
aircraft as operating leases.Continental.
Continental expects its cash outlays for 19981999 capital expenditures,
exclusive of fleet plan requirements, to aggregate $211$254 million,
primarily relating to mainframe, software application and
automation infrastructure projects, aircraft modifications and
mandatory maintenance projects, passenger terminal facility
improvements and office, maintenance, telecommunications and ground
equipment. Continental's capital expenditures during 19971998
aggregated $118$179 million, exclusive of fleet plan requirements.
The Company expects to fund its future capital commitments through
internally generated funds together with general Company financings
and aircraft financing transactions. However, there can be no
assurance that sufficient financing will be available for all
aircraft and other capital expenditures not covered by firm
financing commitments.
Year 2000.2000 and Euro. The Year 2000 issue arises as a result of
computer programs having been written using two digits (rather than
four) to define the applicable year, among other problems. Any
information technology ("IT") systems that have time-sensitive
software might recognize a date using "00" as the year 1900 rather
than the year 2000, which could result in miscalculations and
system failures. The problem also extends to many "non-IT"
systems; that is, operating and control systems that rely on
embedded chip systems. In addition, the Company is at risk from
Year 2000 failures on the part of third party-suppliers and
governmental agencies with which the Company interacts.
The Company uses a significant number of computer software programs
and embedded operating systems that are essential to its
operations. As a result,For this reason, the Company implemented a Year 2000
project in early 1997 to ensurelate 1996 so that the Company's computer systems willwould
function properly in the year 2000 and thereafter. The Company's
Year 2000 project involves the review of a number of internal and
third-party systems. Each system is subjected to the project's
five phases which consist of systems inventory, evaluation and
analysis, modification implementation, user testing and integration
compliance. The systems are currently in various stages of
completion. The Company anticipates completing its Year 2000 projectreview of
systems in earlythe second quarter of 1999 and believes that, with
modifications to its existing software and systems and/or
conversions to new software, the Year 2000 Issueissue will not pose
significant operational problems for its computer systems.
The Company has also initiated communications and on-site visits
with its significant suppliers, vendors and vendorsgovernmental agencies
with which its systems interface and exchange data or upon which
its business depends. The Company is coordinating efforts with
these parties to minimize the extent to which its business willmay be
vulnerable to their failure to remediate their own Year 2000
issues.problems. The Company's business is also
dependent upon certain
domestic and foreign governmental organizations or entities such as
the Federal Aviation Administration ("FAA") that provide essential
aviation industry infrastructure. There can be no assurance that
the systems of such third parties on which the Company's business
relies (including those of the FAA) will be modified on a timely
basis. The Company's business, financial condition or results of
operations could be materially adversely affected by the failure of
its equipment or systems or those operated by other parties to
operate properly beyond 1999. ToAlthough the extentCompany currently has
day-to-day operational contingency plans, management is in the
process of updating these plans for possible Year 2000-specific
operational requirements. The Company anticipates completing the
revision of current contingency plans and the creation of
additional contingency plans by September 1999. In addition, the
Company will be developingcontinue to monitor third-party (including
governmental) readiness and executingwill modify its contingency plans
designedaccordingly. While the Company does not currently expect any
significant modification of its operations in response to allow continued operationthe Year
2000 issue, in a worst-case scenario the event of failure of
the Company's or third parties' systems.Company could be required
to alter its operations significantly.
The total cost (excluding internal payroll costs) of the Company's Year 2000 project (excluding
internal payroll) is currently estimated at $12$16-18 million and has
been and will be funded through cash from operations. As of
December 31, 1998, the Company had incurred and expensed
approximately $15 million relating to its Year 2000 project. The
cost of the Company's Year 2000 project is limited by the substantial
outsourcing of itsthe Company's systems and the significant
implementation of new systems following itsthe Company's emergence
from bankruptcy in 1993.bankruptcy. The costs of the Company's Year 2000 project and
the date on which the Company believes it will be completed are
based on management's best estimates and include assumptions
regarding third-party modification plans. However, in particular
due to the potential impact of third-party modification plans,
there can be no assurance that these estimates will be achieved and
actual results could differ materially from those anticipated.
Effective January 1, 1999, eleven of the fifteen countries
comprising the European Union began a transition to a single
monetary unit, the "euro", which is scheduled to be completed by
July 1, 2002. The Company has developed processes designed to
allow it to effectively operate in euros. Management does not
anticipate that the implementation of this single currency plan
will have a material effect on the Company's operations or
financial condition.
Bond Financings. In July 1996, the Company announced plans to
expand its gates and related facilities into Terminal B at Bush
Intercontinental Airport, as well as planned improvements at
Terminal C and the construction of a new automated people mover
system linking Terminal B and Terminal C. In April 1997 and
January 1999, the City of Houston completed the offering of $190
million and $46 million, respectively, aggregate principal amount
of tax-exempt special facilities revenue bonds (the "IAH Bonds") payable solely
from rentals paid by Continental under long-term lease agreements
with the City of Houston..
The IAH Bonds are unconditionally guaranteed by Continental. In
connection therewith, the Company has entered into long-term leases
(or amendments to existing leases) with the City of Houston
providing for the Company to make rental payments sufficient to
service the related tax-exempt bonds, which have a term no longer
than 30 years. The proceeds frommajority of the IAH Bonds are
being used to finance the acquisition, construction and
installation of certain terminal and other airport facilities
located at Continental's hub at George Bush Intercontinental
Airport, including a new automated people mover system linking
Terminals B and C and 20 aircraft gates in Terminal B into which
Continental intends to expand its operations. TheCompany's expansion project is
expected to be completed byduring the summer of 1999.
In December 1997,1998, Continental substantially completed construction of a new hangar and
improvements to a cargo facility at Continental's hub at Newark
International Airport.Airport ("Newark"). Continental expects to completecompleted the
financing of these projects in April 1998 with $25$23 million of tax-exempt bonds.tax-
exempt bonds issued by the New Jersey Economic Development
Authority. Continental is also planning a major facility expansion
at Newark which would require, among other matters, agreements to
be reached with the applicable airport authority.
Theauthority and significant
tax-exempt bond financing for the project.
In 1998, the Company is buildingbuilt a wide-body aircraft maintenance hangar
in Honolulu, Hawaii at an estimatedapproximate cost of $25 million.
Construction of the hangar anticipated to be completed by the second quarter of
1998, is beingwas financed by tax-exempt special
facilities revenue bonds issued by the State of Hawaii. In
connection therewith, the Company has entered into long-term leases
providing for the Company to make rental payments sufficient to
service the related tax-
exempttax-exempt bonds.
Continental has announced plans to expandcommenced the expansion of its facilities at its
Hopkins International Airport hub in Cleveland, which expansion is
expected to be completed in the third quarter of 1999. The
expansion, which will include a new jet concourse for the regional
jet service offered by Express, as well as other facility
improvements, is expected to cost approximately $156 million and will beis
being funded principally by the issuance of a combination of tax-
exempttax-exempt special
facilities revenue bonds (expected to be issued(issued in March 1998) and general airport
revenue bonds (issued in December 1997) by the City of Cleveland.
In connection therewith, Continental has entered into a long-term
lease with the City of Cleveland under which rental payments will
be sufficient to service the related bonds.
Employees. In AprilSeptember 1997, collective bargaining agreement
negotiations began with the Independent Association of Continental
Pilots ("the IACP") to amend both the Continental Airlines pilots'
contract (which became amendable in July 1997) and Express pilots'
contract (which became amendable in October 1997). In February
1998, a five-year collective bargaining agreement with the
Continental Airlines pilots was announced by the Company and the
IACP. In March 1998, Express also announced a five-year collective
bargaining agreement with its pilots. These agreements are subject
to approval by the IACP board of directors and ratification by the
Continental and Express pilots. The Company began accruing for the
increased costs of a tentative agreement reached in November 1997
in the fourth quarter of 1997. The Company estimates that such
accrual will be approximately $113 million for 1998. The Company's
mechanics and related employees recently voted to be represented by
the International Brotherhood of Teamsters (the "Teamsters"). The
Company does not believe that the Teamsters' union representation
will be material to the Company. In September 1997, Continental
announced that it intendsplan to
bring all employees to industry standard wages (the averageno later than the
end of the top ten air carriers as ranked
by the Department of Transportation excluding Continental) within
36 months. The announcement further stated that wageyear 2000. Wage increases began in 1997, and will
continue to be phased in over the 36-month periodthrough 2000 as revenue, interest rates
and rental rates reachedreach industry standards.
The following is a table of the Company's, Express's and CMI's
principal collective bargaining agreements, and their respective
amendable dates:
Approximate Contract
Employee Number of Representing Amendable
Group Employees Union Date
Continental Pilots 5,050 Independent October 2002
Association
of Continental
Pilots
Express Pilots 1,100 Independent October 2002
Association
of Continental
Pilots
Dispatchers 150 Transport Workers October 2003
Union of America
Continental 3,220 International January 2002
Mechanics Brotherhood of
Teamsters
Express 280 International (Negotiations
Mechanics Brotherhood of for initial
Teamsters contract
ongoing)
CMI Mechanics 150 International March 2001
Brotherhood of
Teamsters
Continental 6,925 International December 1999
Flight Attendants Association of
Machinists and
Aerospace Workers
Express 375 International November 1999
Flight Attendants Association of
Machinists and
Aerospace Workers
CMI 450 International June 2000
Flight Attendants Association of
Machinists and
Aerospace Workers
CMI Fleet and 300 International March 2001
Passenger Service Brotherhood of
Employees Teamsters
The other employees of Continental, estimates that the increased wages will aggregate approximately
$500 million over the 36-month period.Express and CMI are not covered
by collective bargaining agreements.
Other. As a result of the continued weaknessdecline of the yen against the dollar,
a weak Japanese economy and increased fuel costs, CMI's operating
earnings have declined during 1996 and 1997,1997. Although CMI's results in
Asia have declined significantly in recent years, the Company
successfully redeployed CMI capacity into the stronger domestic
markets and are not
expected to improve materially absent a significant improvement in
these factors.CMI's most recent results have improved.
In addition, the Company has entered into petroleum call option
contracts, petroleum swap contracts and jet fuel purchase
commitments to provide some short-term protection (generally three
to six months) against a sharp increase in jet fuel prices, and CMI has
entered into forward contracts and purchased foreign currency
average rate option contracts to hedge a portion of its Japanese
yen-denominated ticket sales against a significant depreciation in
the value of the yen versus the United States dollar.
On January 26, 1998, the Company announced that, in connection with
an agreement by Air Partners, L.P. to dispose of its interest in
the Company to an affiliate of Northwest Airlines, Inc.
("Northwest"), the Company had entered into a long-term global
alliance with Northwest.
The Company estimates that the alliance with Northwest, when fully
phased in over a three-year period, will generate in excess of $500
million in additional annual pre-tax operating income for the
carriers, and anticipates that approximately 45% of such pre-tax
operating income will accrue to the Company.
In FebruaryDuring 1998, Continental began a block space arrangementblock-space arrangements whereby it
is committed to purchase capacity on another carrierother carriers at aan aggregate
cost of approximately $147$ 150 million per year. This arrangement isThese arrangements
are for 10 years. Pursuant to other block spaceblock-space arrangements,
other carriers are committed to purchase capacity on Continental.
On March 3, 1998, the Company announced that its Boardat a cost of
Directors
had authorized the expenditure of up toapproximately $100 million to repurchase
the Company's common stock or convertible securities. No time
limit was placed on the duration of the repurchase program.
Subject to applicable securities laws, such purchases will be at
times and in amounts as the Company deems appropriate. As of March
17, 1998, 200,000 shares had been repurchased.Continental.
Management believes that the Company's costs are likely to be
affected in the future by (i) higher aircraft rental expense as new
aircraft are delivered, (ii) higher wages, salaries and related
costs as the Company compensates its employees comparable to
industry average, (iii) changes in the costs of materials and
services (in particular, the cost of fuel, which can fluctuate
significantly in response to global market conditions),
(iv) changes in governmental regulations and taxes affecting air
transportation and the costs charged for airport access, including
new security requirements, (v) changes in the Company's fleet and
related capacity and (vi) the Company's continuing efforts to
reduce costs throughout its operations, including reduced
maintenance costs for new aircraft, reduced distribution expense
from using Continental's electronic ticket product, ("E-Ticket")E-Ticket and
the Internet for bookings, and reduced interest expense.
ITEM 7A. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET
RISK
Market Risk Sensitive Instruments and Positions
The Company is subject to certain market risks, including commodity
price risk (i.e., aircraft fuel prices), interest rate risk,
foreign currency risk and price changes related to investments in
equity securities. Following is a discussion of theThe adverse effects of potential changes in
these market risks.risks are discussed below. The sensitivity analyses
presented do not consider the effects that such adverse changes may
have on overall economic activity nor do they consider additional
actions management may take to mitigate the Company's exposure to
such changes. Actual results may differ. See the notes to the
consolidated financial statements for a description of the
Company's accounting policies and other information related to
these financial instruments.
Aircraft Fuel. The Company's results of operations are
significantly impacted by changes in the price of aircraft fuel.
During 1997,1998, aircraft fuel accounted for 14%10.2% of the Company's
operating expenses.expenses (excluding fleet disposition/impairment loss).
Based on the Company's 19981999 projected fuel consumption, a one cent
change in the average annual price per gallon of aircraft fuel
would impact the Company's annual aircraft fuel expense by
approximately $15 million.$12 million, after the effect of hedging instruments
and jet fuel purchase commitments in place as of December 31, 1998.
In order to provide short-term protection (generally three to six
months) against sharp
increases in aircraft fuel prices,, the Company has entered into petroleum call options.options,
petroleum swap contracts and jet fuel purchase commitments. The
Company's fuel hedging strategy could result in the Company not
fully benefiting from certain fuel price declines. As of December
31, 1997,1998, the Company had hedged approximately 24%25% of its projected
19981999 fuel requirements, including 100%93% related to the first quarter.quarter
and 9% related to the second quarter using petroleum swap
contracts. The Company estimates that at December 31, 1998, a ten
percent change in the price per gallon of aircraft fuel would have
changed the fair value of the existing petroleum swap contracts by
$8 million.
Foreign Currency. The Company is exposed to the effect of exchange
rate fluctuations on the U.S. dollar value of foreign currency
denominated operating revenue and expenses. The Company's largest
exposure comes from the Japanese yen. The result of a uniform 10%25%
strengthening in the value of the U.S. dollar from December 31,
19971998 levels relative to the yen is estimated towould result in aan estimated
decrease in operating income of approximately $25$13 million for 1998.1999,
after the effect of hedging instruments in place. However, the
Company has mitigatedis attempting to mitigate the effect of certain of these potential
foreign currency losses by purchasing foreign currency average rate
option contracts and entering into forward contracts that
effectively enable it to sell Japanese yen expected to be received
from yen-denominated ticket sales over the next nine to twelve
months at specified dollar amounts. As of December 31, 1997,1998, the
Company had purchased average rate options and entered into forward
contracts to hedge approximately 100% of its first and second
quarter 1999 projected
1998 net yen-denominated cash flows and 75% of
its third quarter 1999 projected net yen-denominated cash flows.
The Company estimates that at December 31, 1998, a 25%
strengthening in the value of the U.S. dollar relative to the yen
would have increased the fair value of the existing average rate
options and forward contracts by $22 million.
Interest Rates. The Company's results of operations are affected
by fluctuations in interest rates (e.g., interest expense on debt
and interest income earned on short-term investments).
The Company had approximately $714$599 million of variable-rate debt as
of December 31, 1997. If average interest rates increased by 0.5%
during 1998 as compared to 1997, the Company's projected 1998
interest expense would increase by approximately $3 million.1998. The Company has mitigated its exposure on
certain variable-rate debt by entering into an interest rate cap
(notional amount of $142$125 million as of December 31, 1997)1998) which
expires in July 2001. The interest rate cap limits the amount of
potential increase in the Eurodollar
or PrimeLIBOR rate component of the floating rate
to a maximum of 9% over the term of the contract. If average
interest rates increased by 1.0% during 1999 as compared to 1998,
the Company's projected 1999 interest expense would increase by
approximately $5 million. The interest rate cap does not mitigate
this increase in interest expense materially.
As of December 31, 1997,1998, the fair value of $793 million$1.52 billion (carrying
value) of the Company's fixed-rate debt was estimated to be $803
million,$1.47
billion, based upon discounted future cash flows using current
incremental borrowing rates for similar types of instruments or
market prices. Market risk, estimated as the potential increase in
fair value resulting from a hypothetical 0.5%1.0% decrease in interest
rates, was approximately $18$70 million as of December 31, 1997.1998. The
fair value of the remaining fixed-rate debt (with a carrying value
of $162$287 million and primarily relating to aircraft modification
notes and various loans with immaterial balances) was not
practicable to estimate due to the large number and small dollar
amounts of these notes.
If 19981999 average short-term interest rates decreased by 0.5%1.0% over
19971998 average rates, the Company's projected interest income from
short-term investments would decrease by approximately $4$13 million
during 1998.
Preferred Securities of Trust. As of December 31, 1997, the fair
value of Continental's 8-1/2% Convertible Trust Originated
Preferred Securities was estimated to be $514 million using market
prices, which exceeded the carrying value of these securities by
$272 million. Market risk is estimated as the potential increase
in fair value resulting from a hypothetical 10% increase in market
prices and was estimated to be $51 million as of December 31, 1997.1999.
Investments in Equity Securities. Continental's investment in
America West Holdings Corporation at December 31, 1997,1998, which was recorded asat
its fair value of $9$3 million and includes unrealized gains of $4$1
million, has exposure to price risk. This risk is estimated as the
potential loss in fair value resulting from a hypothetical 10%
adverse change in prices quoted by stock exchanges and amounts to
less than $1 million.
The Company also has ana 12.4% investment in AMADEUS Global Travel
Distribution S.A. ("AMADEUS") and a 49% equity investment in
Compania Panamena de Aviacion, S.A. ("COPA") which isare also subject
to price risk. However, since a readily determinable market value
does not exist for either AMADEUS (itor COPA (each is privately held),
the Company is unable to quantify the amount of price risk
sensitivity inherent in this investment.these investments. At December 31, 1998,
the carrying value of these investments was $95 million and $53
million, respectively. At December 31, 1997, the carrying value of
AMADEUS was $95 million.
ITEM 8. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA.
Index to Consolidated Financial Statements
Page No.
Report of Independent Auditors F-2
Consolidated Statements of Operations for each of the
Three Years in the Period Ended December 31, 19971998 F-3
Consolidated Balance Sheets as of December 31, 19971998
and 19961997 F-5
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for each of the
Three Years in the Period Ended December 31, 19971998 F-7
Consolidated Statements of Redeemable Preferred Stock
and Common Stockholders' Equity for each of the
Three Years in the Period Ended December 31, 1997 F-91998 F-10
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements F-13F-15
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS
The Board of Directors and Stockholders
Continental Airlines, Inc.
We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of
Continental Airlines, Inc. (the "Company") as of December 31, 19971998
and 1996,1997, and the related consolidated statements of operations,
redeemable preferred stock and common stockholders' equity and cash
flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31,
1997.1998. These financial statements are the responsibility of the
Company's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion
on these financial statements based on our audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with generally accepted
auditing standards. Those standards require that we plan and
perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the
financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit
includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the
amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also
includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant
estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall
financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits
provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred to
above present fairly, in all material respects, the consolidated
financial position of the Company at December 31, 1998 and 1997,
and 1996, the consolidated results of its operations and its cash flows
for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 1997,1998,
in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles.
ERNST & YOUNG LLP
Houston, Texas
February 9, 1998
except for Note 13, as
to which the date is
March 18, 1998January 20, 1999
CONTINENTAL AIRLINES, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
(In millions, except per share data)
Year Ended December 31,
1998 1997 1996 1995
Operating Revenue:
Passenger. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $7,366 $6,660 $5,871
$5,302
Cargo.Cargo and mail . . . . . . . . . . . . . 275 258 232
Other. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 175 154 145
Mail and other . . . . . . . . . . . . . 378 335 378310 295 257
7,951 7,213 6,360 5,825
Operating Expenses:
Wages, salaries and related costs. . . . 1,688 1,452 1,381
Employee incentives. . . . . . . . . . . 126 97 512,218 1,814 1,549
Aircraft fuel. . . . . . . . . . . . . . 727 885 774
681Aircraft rentals . . . . . . . . . . . . 659 551 509
Commissions. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 583 567 510
489
AircraftMaintenance, materials and repairs . . . 582 537 461
Other rentals and landing fees . . . . . 414 395 350
Depreciation and amortization. . . . . . 294 254 254
Fleet disposition/impairment losses:
Jet . . . . . . . . . . . . 551 509 497
Maintenance, materials and repairs . . . 537 461 429
Other rentals and landing fees . . . . . 395 350 356
Depreciation and amortization. . . . . . 254 254 253
Fleet disposition charge65 - 128
Turboprop . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 57 - 128 -
Other. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1,651 1,494 1,300
1,3037,250 6,497 5,835
5,440
Operating Income 701 716 525 385
Nonoperating Income (Expense):
Interest expense . . . . . . . . . . . . (178) (166) (165) (213)
Interest capitalized . . . . . . . . . . 35 5 6
Interest income. . . . . . . . . . . . . 59 56 43
31
Gain on System One transactions.Interest capitalized . . . . - - 108. . . . . . 55 35 5
Other, net . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11 (1) 20
(7)(53) (76) (97) (75)
Income before Income Taxes, Minority
Interest and Extraordinary Loss.Charge. . . . .648 640 428 310
Income Tax Provision. . . . . . . . . . . (248) (237) (86) (78)
(continued on next page)
CONTINENTAL AIRLINES, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
(In millions, except per share data)
Year Ended December 31,
1998 1997 1996 1995
Income before Minority Interest
and Extraordinary Loss .Charge . . . . . . . . $ 400 $ 403 $ 342 $ 232
Minority Interest . . . . . . . . . . . . - - (3) (6)
Distributions on Preferred Securities
of Trust, net of applicable income taxes
of $8,$7, $8 and $0,$8, respectively . . . . . (13) (14) (14) (2)
Income before Extraordinary Loss.Charge. . . . .387 389 325
224
Extraordinary Loss,Charge, net of applicable
income taxes of $2, $2 and $4,
respectively.respectively . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (4) (4) (6) -
Net Income. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 383 385 319 224
Preferred Dividend Requirements and
Accretion to Liquidation Value . . . . . - (2) (5) (9)
Income Applicable to Common Shares. . . . $ 383 $ 314383 $ 215314
Earnings per Common Share:
Income before Extraordinary Loss.Charge. . . .$ 6.40 $ 6.72 $ 5.87
$ 4.07
Extraordinary Loss.Charge. . . . . . . . . . .(0.06) (0.07) (0.12) -
Net Income. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 6.34 $ 6.65 $ 5.75 $ 4.07
Earnings per Common Share Assuming
Dilution:
Income before Extraordinary Loss.Charge. . . .$ 5.06 $ 5.03 $ 4.25
$ 3.37
Extraordinary Loss. .Charge. . . . . . . . . . (0.04) (0.04) (0.08) -
Net Income. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 5.02 $ 4.99 $ 4.17 $ 3.37
The accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements are an
integral part of these statements.
CONTINENTAL AIRLINES, INC.
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(In millions, except for share data)
December 31, December 31,
ASSETS 1998 1997 1996
Current Assets:
Cash and cash equivalents, including
restricted cash and cash equivalents
of $15$11 and $76,$15, respectively. . . . . . $1,399 $1,025 $1,061
Accounts receivable, net of allowance
for doubtful receivables of $23$22 and
$27,$23, respectively . . . . . . . . . . . 449 361 377
Spare parts and supplies, net of
allowance for obsolescence of $51$46 and
$47,$51, respectively . . . . . . . . . . . 166 128 111
Deferred income taxes. . . . . . . . . . 234 111 -
Prepayments and other assets . . . . . . 106 103 85
Total current assets . . . . . . . . . 2,354 1,728 1,634
Property and Equipment:
Owned property and equipment:
Flight equipment. . . . . . . . . . . . 2,459 1,636 1,199
Other . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 582 456
3383,041 2,092 1,537
Less: Accumulated depreciation . . . . 625 473
3702,416 1,619 1,167
Purchase deposits for flight equipment . 410 437 154
Capital leases:
Flight equipment. . . . . . . . . . . . 361 274 396
Other . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 56 40
31417 314 427
Less: Accumulated amortization . . . . 178 145
152239 169 275
Total property and equipment . . . . . 3,065 2,225 1,596
Other Assets:
Routes, gates and slots, net of
accumulated amortization
of $270$283 and $212,$270, respectively. . . . . 1,181 1,425 1,473
Reorganization value in excess of
amounts allocable to identifiable
assets, net of accumulated amortization
of $71 and $60, respectively.in 1997. . . . . . . . . . . . . - 164 237
Investments. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 151 104 134
Other assets, net. . . . . . . . . . . . 335 184 132
Total other assets . . . . . . . . . . 1,667 1,877 1,976
Total Assets . . . . . . . . . . . . $7,086 $5,830 $5,206
(continued on next page)
CONTINENTAL AIRLINES, INC.
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(In millions, except for share data)
December 31, December 31,
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY 1998 1997 1996
Current Liabilities:
Current maturities of long-term debt . . $ 243184 $ 201243
Current maturities of capital leases . . 47 40 60
Accounts payable . . . . . . . . . . . . 843 781 705
Air traffic liability. . . . . . . . . . 854 746 661
Accrued payroll and pensions . . . . . . 158 149265158
Accrued other liabilities. . . . . . . . 249 317 328
Total current liabilities . . . . . . . 2,442 2,285 2,104
Long-Term Debt. . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2,267 1,426 1,368
Capital Leases. . . . . . . . . . . . . . 213 142 256
Deferred Credits and Other Long-Term
Liabilities:
Deferred income taxes. . . . . . . . . . 372 435 75
Accruals for aircraft retirements and
excess facilities . . . . . . . . . . . 95 123 188
Other. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 393 261 331
Total deferred credits and other
long-term liabilities. . . . . . . . . 860 819 594
Commitments and Contingencies
Minority Interest . . . . . . . . . . . . - 15
Continental-Obligated Mandatorily
Redeemable Preferred Securities
of Subsidiary Trust Holding Solely
Convertible Subordinated
Debentures (1) . . . . . . . . . . . . . 111 242 242
Redeemable Preferred Stock. . . . . . . . - 46
Common Stockholders' Equity:
Class A common stock - $.01 par,
50,000,000 shares authorized;
8,379,46411,406,732 shares issued and 9,280,000out-
standing in 1998 and 8,379,464
shares issued and outstanding
respectivelyin 1997 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . - -
Class B common stock - $.01 par,
200,000,000 shares authorized;
50,512,01053,370,741 shares issued in 1998
and 47,943,34350,512,010 shares issued and
outstanding respectively.in 1997 . . . . . . . . . . 1 -1
Additional paid-in capital . . . . . . . 639 693634 641
Retained earnings (accumulated deficit). 276 (109)
Other.earnings. . . . . . . . . . . . 659 276
Accumulated other comprehensive income . (88) (2)
Treasury Stock - 399,524 Class B
shares in 1998, at cost . . . . . . . . (13) - (3)
Total common stockholders' equity . . . 1,193 916 581
Total Liabilities and Stockholders'
Equity . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $7,086 $5,830 $5,206
(1) The sole assets of the Trust arewere convertible subordinated
debentures. At December 31, 1998 and 1997, the debentures withhad an
aggregate principal amount of $115 and $249 million, which bearrespectively,
bore interest at the rate of 8-1/2% per annum and were to mature on
December 1, 2020. Upon repayment,In November and December 1998, approximately
$134 million of such securities converted into 5,558,649 shares of
Class B common stock, and in January 1999, the Continental-Obligated Mandatorily
Redeemable Preferred Securitiesremainder of Subsidiary Trust will be
mandatorily redeemed.such
securities were converted into 4,752,522 shares of Class B common
stock.
The accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements are an
integral part of these statements.
CONTINENTAL AIRLINES, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(In millions)
Year Ended December 31,
1998 1997 1996 1995
Cash Flows From Operating
Activities:
Net income . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 383 $ 385 $ 319 $224
Adjustments to reconcile net income
to net cash provided by operating
activities:
Depreciation and amortization.Deferred income taxes. . . . . 254 254 253
Provision for aircraft and
facilities.. . . . 241 212 72
Depreciation . . . . . . . . . . . . . 211 162 153
Fleet disposition/impairment losses. . 122 - 128
14
Deferred income taxes. . . . . . . . . 212 72 71
Gain on sale of America West stock
and warrants.Amortization . . . . . . . . . . . . - (18) -
Gain on System One transactions. . . . - - (108)83 92 101
Other, net . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (4) 34 11 27
Changes in operating assets and
liabilities:
Increase in air traffic liability. . 108 85 82
Increase in accounts receivable. . . (102) (1) (42) (21)
Increase in spare parts and
supplies. . . . . . . . . . . . . . (71) (38) (43) (8)
Increase in accounts payable . . . . 59 71 103 48
Increase (decrease) in air traffic
liability . . . . . . . . . . . . . 85 82 (5)
Other. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (150) (42) (35) (176)(53)
Net cash provided by operating
activities. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 880 960 831 319
Cash Flows from Investing Activities:
Capital expenditures, net of returned
purchase deposits in 1996 and 1995. . . (417) (198) (67)
Purchase deposits paid in connection
with future aircraft deliveries . . . . (818) (409) (116)
(15)
DepositsPurchase deposits refunded in
connection with aircraft transactionsdelivered. . . 758 141 20
Capital expenditures, net of returned
purchase deposits in 1996 . . . . . . . (610) (417) (198)
Investment in partner airline. . . . . . (53) - -
Proceeds from disposition of property
and equipment . . . . . . . . . 141 20 97. . . . 46 29 11
Other. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 28 43 60(21) (1) 32
Net cash provided (used)used by investing activities . . . . . . . . .(698) (657) (251) 75
Cash Flows From Financing Activities:
Net proceeds from issuance of
long-term debt. . . . . . . . . . . . . 517 797 9
Payments on long-term debt and
capital lease obligations . . . . . . . (676) (975) (318)
Net proceeds from issuance of
preferred securities of trust . . . . . - - 242
Purchase of warrants . . . . . . . . . . (94) (50) (14)
Other. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (25) 30 13
Net cash used by financing activities . (278) (198) (68)
(continued on next page)
CONTINENTAL AIRLINES, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(In millions)
Year Ended December 31,
1998 1997 1996
1995
Cash Flows From Financing Activities:
Proceeds from issuance of
long-term debt, net . . . . . . . . . . $ 737 $ 517 $ 797
Payments on long-term debt and
capital lease obligations . . . . . . . (423) (676) (975)
Purchase of Class B treasury stock . . . (223) - -
Proceeds from sale-leaseback
transactions. . . . . . . . . . . . . . 71 39 47
Proceeds from issuance of common stock . 56 24 18
Dividends paid on preferred securities
of trust. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (22) (22) (22)
Purchase of warrants to purchase
Class B common stock. . . . . . . . . . - (94) (50)
Redemption of preferred stock. . . . . . - (48) -
Other. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . - (18) (13)
Net cash provided (used) by financing
activities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 196 (278) (198)
(continued on next page)
CONTINENTAL AIRLINES, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(In millions)
Year Ended December 31,
1998 1997 1996
Net Increase in Cash and
Cash Equivalents . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 378 $ 25 $ 382 $326
Cash and Cash Equivalents
Beginning of Period (1). . . . . . . . . 1,010 985 603 277
Cash and Cash Equivalents
End of Period (1). . . . . . . . . . . . $1,388 $1,010 $ 985 $603
Supplemental Cash Flows Information:
Interest paid. . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 157 $ 156 $ 161
$179
Income taxes paid, netpaid. . . . . . . . . . . . $ 25 $ 12 $ 4 $ 11
Financing and Investing Activities
Not Affecting Cash:
Capital lease obligations incurred. . . $ 22 $ 32 $ 10
Property and equipment acquired
through the issuance of debt . . . . . $ 425 $ 207 $ 119
Conversion of trust originated
preferred securities . . . . . . . . . $ 92134 $ - $ -
Capital lease obligations incurred. . . $ 124 $ 22 $ 32
Reduction of capital lease
obligations in connection with
refinanced aircraft. . . . . . . . . . $ - $ 97 $ -
$ -
Investment in AMADEUS acquired in con-
nection with System One transactionsFinanced purchase deposits for flight
equipment, net . $ - $ - $120
Issuance of convertible secured
debentures in connection with the
aircraft settlements. . . . . . . . . . . $ - $ - $15814 $ 19
(1) Excludes restricted cash of $11 million, $15 million, $76 million
$144 million
and $119$144 million at December 31, 1998, 1997, 1996 1995 and 1994,1995,
respectively.
The accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements are an
integral part of these statements.
CONTINENTAL AIRLINES, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF REDEEMABLE PREFERRED
STOCK AND COMMON STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY
(In millions)
Retained Accumulated
Redeemable Additional Earnings Other Treasury
Preferred Paid-In (Accumulated Comprehensive Comprehensive Stock,
Stock Capital Deficit) OtherIncome Income at Cost
Balance, December 31, 1994 . . . . . .1995 . . $ 5341 $ 778723 $ (652) $(23)
Net Income . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .(428) $ 10 $ - - 224 -
Purchase of Warrants . . . . . . . . . . . - (51) - -
Accumulated Dividends:
8% Cumulative Redeemable Preferred
Stock. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2 (2) - -
12% Cumulative Redeemable Preferred
Stock. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2 (2) - -
Series A 12% Cumulative Preferred Stock . 2 (2) - -
Issuance of Note in Exchange for
Series A 8% Cumulative Preferred Stock. . (18) (3) - -
Additional Minimum Pension Liability . . . - - - (1)
Unrealized Gain on Marketable Equity
Securities. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . - - - 20
Other. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . - 15 - 4
Balance, December 31, 1995 . . . . . . . . 41 733 (428)$ -
Net Income . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . - - 319 - 319 -
Purchase of Warrants . . . . . . . . . . . - (50) - - - -
Accumulated Dividends:
Series A 12% Cumulative
Preferred StockStock. . . . . . . 5 (5) - - - -
Additional Minimum Pension
Liability, net of applicable
income taxes of $2. . . . . . - - - 6 6 -
Unrealized Gain on Marketable
Equity Securities, net .of
applicable income taxes
of $1 . . . . . . . . . . . . - - - 4 Sale of America West Stock and Warrants.4 -
Reclassification to realized
gains . . . . . . . . . . . . - - - (18) - -
Other. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . - 1520 - 5- - -
Balance, December 31, 1996 . . . . . . . . 46 693688 (109) (3)2 329 -
(continued on next page)
CONTINENTAL AIRLINES, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF REDEEMABLE PREFERRED
STOCK AND COMMON STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY
(In millions)
Retained Accumulated
Redeemable Additional Earnings Other Treasury
Preferred Paid-In (Accumulated Comprehensive Comprehensive Stock,
Stock Capital Deficit) OtherIncome Income at Cost
Net Income . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ - $ - $ 385 - $385 $ -
Purchase of Warrants . . . . . . . . . . . - (94) - - - -
Accumulated Dividends on
Series A 12% Cumulative
Preferred Stock.Stock . . . . . . . 2 (2) - - - -
Redemption of Series A
12% Cumulative Preferred
Stock . . . . . . . . . . . . . (48) - - - - -
Additional Minimum Pension
Liability, net of applicable
income taxes of $2. . . . . . - - - (4) (4) -
Other. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .- 49 - - - -
Balance, December 31, 1997 . . - 42641 276 (2) 381 -
7
Balance, December 31, 1997(continued on next page)
CONTINENTAL AIRLINES, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF REDEEMABLE PREFERRED
STOCK AND COMMON STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY
(In millions)
Retained Accumulated
Redeemable Additional Earnings Other Treasury
Preferred Paid-In (Accumulated Comprehensive Comprehensive Stock,
Stock Capital Deficit) Income Income at Cost
Net Income . . . . . . . . . . $ - $ 639- $ 276383 $ - $383 $ -
Cumulative Effect of
Adopting SFAS 133 (see Note 5)
as of October 1, 1998, net of
applicable income taxes
of $1 . . . . . . . . . . . . - - - 1 1 -
Net loss on derivative
instruments designated and
qualifying as cash flow
hedging instruments, net of
applicable income taxes
of $4 . . . . . . . . . . . . - - - (7) (7) -
Additional Minimum Pension
Liability, net of applicable
income taxes of $41 . . . . . - - - (76) (76) -
Unrealized Gain on Marketable
Equity Securities, net of
applicable income taxes
of $1 . . . . . . . . . . . . - - - (4) (4) -
Purchase of Common Stock . . . - - - - - (223)
Reissuance of Treasury Stock
pursuant to Stock Plans . . . - - - - - 50
Issuance of Common Stock
pursuant to Stock Plans . . . - 9 - - - -
Conversion of Trust Originated
Preferred Securities into
Common Stock. . . . . . . . . - (32) - - - 160
Other. . . . . . . . . . . . . - 16 - - - -
Balance, December 31, 1998 . . - $ 634 $ 659 $ (88) $297 $(13)
CONTINENTAL AIRLINES, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF REDEEMABLE PREFERRED
STOCK AND COMMON STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY
NUMBER OF SHARES
Redeemable Class A Class B
Preferred Common Common Treasury
Stock Stock Stock Stock
Balance, December 31, 1994 . . . . . . . 471,000 12,602,112 40,747,024 60,000
Cancellation of 8% and 12% Cumulative
Redeemable Preferred Stock. . . . . . . (471,000) - - -
Issuance of Series A 8% and 12%
Cumulative Preferred Stock. . . . . . . 589,142 - - -
Issuance of Note in Exchange for
Series A 8% Cumulative Preferred
Stock . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (202,784) - - -
Forfeiture of Restricted Class B
Common Stock. . . . . . . . . . . . . . - - (55,000) 55,000
Reissuance of Treasury Stock . . . . . . - - 115,000 (115,000)
Preferred Stock In-kind Dividend . . . . 11,590 - - -
Issuance of Common Stock pursuant to
Stock Plans and Awards. . . . . . . . . - - 863,978 -
Other. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . - - 1,185,546 -
Balance, December 31, 1995 . . . . . . . 397,948 12,602,112 42,856,548 -
Conversion of Class A to Class B
Common Stock by Air Canada. . . . . . . - (3,322,112) 3,322,112 -
Forfeiture of Restricted Class B
Common Stock. . . . . . . . . . . . . . - - (60,000) 60,000
Purchase of Common Stock . . . . . . . . - - (133,826) 133,826
Reissuance of Treasury Stock . . . . . . - - 193,826 (193,826)
Preferred Stock In-kind Dividend . . . . 49,134 - - -
Issuance of Common Stock pursuant to
Stock Plans and Awards. . . . . . . . . - - 1,764,683 -
Balance, December 31, 1996 . . . . . . . 447,082 9,280,000 47,943,343 -
(continued on next page)
CONTINENTAL AIRLINES, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF REDEEMABLE PREFERRED
STOCK AND COMMON STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY
NUMBER OF SHARES
Redeemable Class A Class B
Preferred Common Common Treasury
Stock Stock Stock Stock
Conversion of Class A to Class B
Common Stock. . . . . . . . . . . . . . - (900,536) 900,536 -
Purchase of Common Stock . . . . . . . . - - (154,882) 154,882
Reissuance of Treasury Stock pursuant
to Stock Plans. . . . . . . . . . . . . - - 154,882 (154,882)
Issuance of Preferred Stock Dividends
on Series A 12% Cumulative Preferred
Stock . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 13,165 - - -
Redemption of Series A 12% Cumulative
Preferred Stock . . . . . . . . . . . . (460,247) - - -
Issuance of Common Stock pursuant to
Stock Plans . . . . . . . . . . . . . . - - 1,646,419 -
Conversion of Trust Originated
Preferred Securities into
Common Stock. . . . . . . . . . . . . . - - 21,712 -
Balance, December 31, 1997 . . . . . . . - 8,379,464 50,512,010 -
(continued on next page)
CONTINENTAL AIRLINES, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF REDEEMABLE PREFERRED
STOCK AND COMMON STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY
NUMBER OF SHARES
Redeemable Class A Class B
Preferred Common Common Treasury
Stock Stock Stock Stock
Purchase of Common Stock . . . . . . . . - - (4,452,700) 4,452,700
Reissuance of Treasury Stock pursuant
to Stock Plans. . . . . . . . . . . . . - - 859,080 (859,080)
Reissuance of Treasury Stock pursuant
to Conversion of Trust Originated
Preferred Securities. . . . . . . . . . - - 3,181,896 (3,181,896)
Conversion of Class A to Class B
Common Stock. . . . . . . . . . . . . . - (12,200) 12,200 (12,200)
Issuance of Common Stock pursuant to
Stock Plans . . . . . . . . . . . . . . - - 235,290 -
Conversion of Trust Originated
Preferred Securities into
Common Stock. . . . . . . . . . . . . . - - 2,376,753 -
Exercise of warrants . . . . . . . . . . - 3,039,468 246,688 -
Balance, December 31, 1998 . . . . . . . - 11,406,732 52,971,217 399,524
The accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements are an integral part of these statements.
CONTINENTAL AIRLINES, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Continental Airlines, Inc. (the "Company" or "Continental") is a
major United States air carrier engaged in the business of
transporting passengers, cargo and mail. Continental is the fifth
largest United States airline (as measured by 19971998 revenue
passenger miles) and, together with its wholly owned subsidiaries,
Continental Express, Inc. ("Express"), and Continental Micronesia,
Inc. ("CMI"), each a Delaware corporation, serves 191206 airports
worldwide.worldwide on December 31, 1998. As of December 31, 1998,
Continental flies to 125127 domestic and 6679 international destinations
and offers additional connecting service through alliances with
domestic and foreign carriers. Continental directly serves 1013
European cities, eight South American cities and is one of the
leading airlines providing service to Mexico and Central America,
serving more destinations there than any other United States
airline.
Continental currently flies to seven cities in South America. Through its Guam hub, CMI provides extensive service in
the western Pacific, including service to more Japanese cities than
any other United States carrier.
As used in these Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements, the
terms "Continental" and "Company" refer to Continental Airlines,
Inc. and, unless the context indicates otherwise, its subsidiaries.
NOTE 1 - SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES
(a) Principles of Consolidation -
The consolidated financial statements of the Company include
the accounts of Continental and its operating subsidiaries,
Express CMI, and prior to April 27, 1995, System One
Information Management, Inc. ("System One"). See Note 11.CMI. All significant intercompany transactions
have been eliminated in consolidation.
(b) Use of Estimates -
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with
generally accepted accounting principles requires management
to make estimates and assumptions that affect the amounts
reported in the financial statements and accompanying notes.
Actual results could differ from those estimates.
(c) Cash and Cash Equivalents -
Cash and cash equivalents consist of cash and short-term,
highly liquid investments which are readily convertible into
cash and have a maturity of three months or less when
purchased. Approximately $15$11 million and $76$15 million of cash
and cash equivalents at December 31, 19971998 and 1996,1997,
respectively, were held in restricted arrangements relating
primarily to payments for workers' compensation claims and in
accordance with the terms of certain other agreements.
(d) Spare Parts and Supplies -
Flight equipment expendable parts and supplies are valued at
average cost. An allowance for obsolescence for flight
equipment expendable parts and supplies is accrued to allocate
the costs of these assets, less an estimated residual value,
over the estimated useful lives of the related aircraft and
engines.
(e) Property and Equipment -
Property and equipment were recorded at fair market values as
of April 27, 1993; subsequent1993. Subsequent purchases were recorded at cost
and are depreciated to estimated residual values (10% of cost)
over their
estimated useful lives using the straight-line method.
Estimated useful lives for such assets areEffective January 1, 1998, the Company increased the
depreciable life on certain new generation Boeing aircraft
from 25 yearsto 30 years. The Company also increased the estimated
residual values on certain Stage 3 and 18 yearsnew generation Boeing
aircraft from the date of manufacture for all10% to 15%. All owned jet
and turboprop aircraft respectively; up to 25 years,
dependingare
depreciated over an 18-year useful life with an estimated
residual value of 10%. Flight and ground equipment under
capital leases are depreciated on a straight-line method over
the respective original lease period, for aircraft acquired under
long-term capital leases; and two to 25 years for otherterms. Ground property and
equipment, including airport facility improvements.improvements, are
depreciated on a straight-line method from 2 to 25 years.
(f) Intangible Assets -
During 1998, the Company determined that it would be able to
recognize additional net operating losses ("NOLs")
attributable to the Company's predecessor as a result of the
completion of several transactions resulting in recognition of
built-in gains for federal income tax purposes. This benefit
was used to reduce to zero reorganization value in excess of
amounts allocable to identifiable assets in the first quarter
of 1998. During the third and fourth quarters of 1998, the
Company determined that additional NOLs of the Company's
predecessor could be benefitted and accordingly reduced the
deferred tax valuation allowance and routes, gates and slots
by $190 million.
Routes, Gates and Slots
Routes are amortized on a straight-line basis over 40 years,
gates over the stated term of the related lease and slots over
20 years. Routes, gates and slots are comprised of the
following (in millions):
Balance at Accumulated Amortization
December 31, 19971998 at December 31, 19971998
Routes. . . . $ 892 $115754 $123
Gates . . . . 407 115327 120
Slots . . . . 126100 40
$1,425 $270$1,181 $283
Reorganization Value In Excess of Amounts Allocable to
Identifiable Assets
Reorganization value in excess of amounts allocable to
identifiable assets, arising from Continental's emergence from
bankruptcy reorganization in 1993, was amortized on a
straight-line basis over 20 years.
(g) Air Traffic Liability -
Passenger revenue is recognized when transportation is
provided rather than when a ticket is sold. The amount of
passenger ticket sales not yet recognized as revenue is
reflected in the accompanying Consolidated Balance Sheets as
air traffic liability. The Company performs periodic
evaluations of this estimated liability, and any adjustments
resulting therefrom, which can be significant, are included in
results of operations for the periods in which the evaluations
are completed.
Continental sponsors a frequent flyer program ("OnePass") and
records an estimated liability for the incremental cost
associated with providing the related free transportation at
the time a free travel award is earned. The liability is
adjusted periodically based on awards earned, awards redeemed
and changes in the OnePass program.
The Company also sells mileage credits in the OnePass program
to participating partners, such as hotels, car rental agencies
and credit card companies. The resulting revenue, net of the
estimated incremental cost of the credits sold, is recorded in
the accompanying Consolidated Statements of Operations during
the period in which the credits are sold as other operating
revenue.
(h) Passenger Traffic Commissions -
Passenger traffic commissions are recognized as expense when
the transportation is provided and the related revenue is
recognized. The amount of passenger traffic commissions not
yet recognized as expense is included in Prepayments and other
assets in the accompanying Consolidated Balance Sheets.
(i) Deferred Income Taxes -
Deferred income taxes are provided under the liability method
and reflect the net tax effects of temporary differences
between the tax basis of assets and liabilities and their
reported amounts in the financial statements.
(j) Maintenance and Repair Costs -
Maintenance and repair costs for owned and leased flight
equipment, including the overhaul of aircraft components, are
charged to operating expense as incurred.
(k) Advertising Costs -
The Company expenses the costs of advertising as incurred.
Advertising expense was $102 million, $98 million and $76
million for the years ended December 31, 1998, 1997 and 1996,
respectively.
(l) Stock Plans and Awards -
Continental has elected to follow Accounting Principles Board
Opinion No. 25 - "Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees"
("APB 25") in accounting for its employee stock options and
its stock purchase plans because the alternative fair value
accounting provided for under Statement of Financial
Accounting Standards No. 123 - "Accounting for Stock-Based
Compensation" ("SFAS 123") requires use of option valuation
models that were not developed for use in valuing employee
stock options or purchase rights. Under APB 25, since the
exercise price of the Company's employee stock options equals
the market price of the underlying stock on the date of grant,
generally no compensation expense is recognized. Furthermore,
under APB 25, since the stock purchase plans are considered
noncompensatory plans, no compensation expense is recognized.
(m) Measurement of Impairment -
In accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting Standards
No. 121, "Accounting for the Impairment of Long-Lived Assets
and for Long-Lived Assets to be Disposed Of" ("SFAS 121"), the
Company records impairment losses on long-lived assets used in
operations when events and circumstances indicate that the
assets might be impaired and the undiscounted cash flows
estimated to be generated by those assets are less than the
carrying amount of those assets.
(n) Recently Issued Accounting Standards -
Statement of Position 98-5, "Reporting on the Costs of Start-
Up Activities" ("SOP 98-5"), requires start-up costs to be
expensed as incurred. Continental will adopt SOP 98-5 in the
first quarter of 1999. This statement requires all
unamortized start up costs (e.g., pilot training costs related
to induction of new aircraft) to be expensed upon adoption,
resulting in approximately a $5 million cumulative effect of
change in accounting, net of tax, in the first quarter of
1999.
(o) Reclassifications -
Certain reclassifications have been made in the prior years'
financial statements to conform to the current year
presentation.
NOTE 2 - EARNINGS PER SHARE
Basic earnings per common share ("EPS") excludes dilution and is
computed by dividing net income available to common stockholders by
the weighted average number of common shares outstanding for the
period. Diluted EPS reflects the potential dilution that could
occur if securities or other obligations to issue common stock were
exercised or converted into common stock or resulted in the
issuance of common stock that then shared in the earnings of the
Company. The following table sets forth the computation of basic
and diluted earnings per share (in millions):
Reorganization Value In Excess of Amounts Allocable to
Identifiable Assets
Reorganization value in excess of amounts allocable to
identifiable assets, arising from Continental's emergence from
bankruptcy reorganization in 1993, is amortized on a straight-
line basis over 20 years. The carrying value of this
intangible asset is reviewed if the facts and circumstances
suggest it may be impaired. If this review indicates that
this intangible asset will not be recoverable, as determined
based on the undiscounted cash flows over the remaining
amortization periods, the carrying value is reduced by the
estimated shortfall of cash flows.
(g) Air Traffic Liability -
Passenger revenue is recognized when transportation is
provided rather than when a ticket is sold. The amount of
passenger ticket sales not yet recognized as revenue is
reflected in the accompanying Consolidated Balance Sheets as
air traffic liability. The Company performs periodic
evaluations of this estimated liability, and any adjustments
resulting therefrom, which can be significant, are included in
results of operations for the periods in which the evaluations
are completed.
Continental sponsors a frequent flyer program ("OnePass") and
records an estimated liability for the incremental cost
associated with providing the related free transportation at
the time a free travel award is earned. The liability is
adjusted periodically based on awards earned, awards redeemed
and changes in the OnePass program.
The Company also sells mileage credits to participating
partners in the OnePass program, such as hotels, car rental
agencies and credit card companies. The resulting revenue,
net of the estimated incremental cost of the credits sold, is
recorded as other operating revenue in the accompanying
Consolidated Statements of Operations during the period in
which the credits are sold.
(h) Passenger Traffic Commissions -
Passenger traffic commissions are recognized as expense when
the transportation is provided and the related revenue is
recognized. The amount of passenger traffic commissions not
yet recognized as expense is included in Prepayments and other
assets in the accompanying Consolidated Balance Sheets.
(i) Deferred Income Taxes -
Deferred income taxes are provided under the liability method
and reflect the net tax effects of temporary differences
between the tax basis of assets and liabilities and their
reported amounts in the financial statements.
(j) Maintenance and Repair Costs -
Maintenance and repair costs for owned and leased flight
equipment, including the overhaul of aircraft components, are
charged to operating expense as incurred.
(k) Advertising Costs -
The Company expenses the costs of advertising as incurred.
Advertising expense was $98 million, $76 million and $94
million for the years ended December 31, 1997, 1996 and 1995,
respectively.
(l) Stock Plans and Awards -
Continental has elected to follow Accounting Principles Board
Opinion No. 25 - "Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees"
("APB 25") in accounting for its employee stock options and
its stock purchase plans because the alternative fair value
accounting provided for under Statement of Financial
Accounting Standards No. 123 - "Accounting for Stock-Based
Compensation" ("SFAS 123") requires use of option valuation
models that were not developed for use in valuing employee
stock options or purchase rights. Under APB 25, since the
exercise price of the Company's employee stock options equals
the market price of the underlying stock on the date of grant,
no compensation expense is recognized. Furthermore, under APB
25, since the stock purchase plans are considered
noncompensatory plans, no compensation expense is recognized.
(m) Recently Issued Accounting Standards -
In June 1997, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (the
"FASB") issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No.
130 - "Reporting Comprehensive Income" ("SFAS 130") and
Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 131 -
"Disclosure About Segments of an Enterprise and Related
Information" ("SFAS 131"). Both SFAS 130 and SFAS 131 are
effective for Continental beginning in the first quarter of
1998.
SFAS 130 establishes standards for the reporting and display
of comprehensive income and its components in a full set of
financial statements. Comprehensive income is defined as the
change in equity during a period from transactions and other
events and circumstances from non-owner sources. Upon
adopting the new standard, Continental will report and display
comprehensive income which includes net income plus non-owner
changes in equity such as the minimum pension liability and
unrealized gains or losses on investments in marketable equity
securities.
SFAS 131 changes the way segment information is presented from
an industry segment approach to a management approach. Under
the management approach, segments are determined based on the
operations regularly reviewed by the chief operating decision
maker to make decisions about resources to be allocated to the
segment and assess its performance. The Company believes that
it will report only one segment and certain additional
geographic disclosures.
In February 1998, the Financial Accounting Standards Board
issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 132 -
"Employers' Disclosures about Pensions and Other
Postretirement Benefits" ("SFAS 132") that revises the
disclosure requirements of Statement of Financial Accounting
Standards No. 87 - "Employers' Accounting for Pensions") and
Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 106 -
"Employers' Accounting for Postretirement Benefits Other than
Pensions". The Company will adopt SFAS 132 in 1998. SFAS 132
is not expected to have an impact on the Company's results of
operations or financial position.
(n) Block Space Arrangements -
Continental has entered into block space arrangements with
certain other carriers whereby one or both of the carriers is
obligated to purchase capacity on the other carrier. To the
extent the other carrier is financially committed to purchase
such capacity on Continental's flights, such payments to
Continental by the other carrier are recorded as a reduction
in the respective operating expenses in the accompanying
Consolidated Statements of Operations. During 1997,
Continental recorded a reduction of approximately $43 million
of such operating expenses. To the extent that Continental is
financially committed to purchase capacity on other carriers,
such payments to other carriers are recorded as a reduction in
other revenue. No such payments were made in 1997. See Note
13.
(o) Reclassifications -
Certain reclassifications have been made in the prior years'
financial statements to conform to the current year
presentation.
NOTE 2 - EARNINGS PER SHARE
In the fourth quarter of 1997, the Company adopted the FASB's
Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 128 - "Earnings per
Share" ("SFAS 128") which specifies the computation, presentation
and disclosure requirements for earnings per common share ("EPS").
SFAS 128 replaces the presentation of primary and fully diluted EPS
pursuant to Accounting Principles Board Opinion No. 15 - "Earnings
per Share" with the presentation of basic and diluted EPS. Basic
EPS excludes dilution and is computed by dividing net income
available to common stockholders by the weighted average number of
common shares outstanding for the period. Diluted EPS reflects the
potential dilution that could occur if securities or other
obligations to issue common stock were exercised or converted into
common stock or resulted in the issuance of common stock that then
shared in the earnings of the entity. All prior-period EPS data
have been retroactively restated and reflect the application of
SFAS 128.
The following table sets forth the computation of basic and diluted
earnings per share (in millions, except per share data):
1998 1997 1996 1995
Numerator:
Income before extraordinary loss. .charge. $387 $389 $325
$224
Extraordinary loss,charge, net of
applicable income taxes. . . . . . (4) (4) (6) -
Net income. . . . . . . . . . . . . 383 385 319 224
Preferred stock dividends . . . . . - (2) (5) (9)
Numerator for basic earnings per
share - income available to
common stockholders. . . . . . . . 383 383 314 215
Effect of dilutive securities:
Series A convertible debentures. . - 1 4
Preferred Securities of Trust. . . 11 14 15 2
6-3/4% convertible subordinated
notes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9 11 8
Series A convertible debentures - - 1
20 25 24 6
Other . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . - (4) (3) (1)
Numerator for diluted earnings
per share - income available to
common stockholders after
assumed conversions . . . . . . . $403 $404 $335 $220
Denominator:
Denominator for basic earnings per
share - weighted-average shares. . 60.3 57.6 54.6 52.8
Effect of dilutive securities:
Employee stock options . . . . . . 1.7 1.6 2.2 1.3
Warrants . . . . . . . . . . . . . 0.9 3.5 5.9 3.6
Restricted Class B common stock. . 0.4 0.8 0.7
Preferred Securities of Trust. . . 9.8 10.3 10.3 0.9
6-3/4% convertible subordinated
notes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7.6 7.6 5.8
Restricted Class B common stock. . - 0.4 0.8
Series A convertible debentures. . - - 0.7 5.9
Dilutive potential common shares. . 20.0 23.4 25.7 12.4
Denominator for diluted earnings
per share - adjusted weighted-
average and assumed conversions . 81.0 80.3 65.281.0 80.3
WarrantsOptions to purchase 11,120,002 weighted average2,909,130 and 2,643,426 shares of the Company's
Class B common stock, par value $.01 per share ("Class B common
stock"), during the third and fourth quarters of 1998,
respectively, were not included in the computation of diluted
earnings per share in 19951998 because the warrants'options' exercise price was
greater than the average market price of the common shares and,
therefore, the effect would have been antidilutive.
NOTE 3 - LONG-TERM DEBT
Long-term debt as of December 31 is summarized as follows (in
millions):
1998 1997 1996
Secured
Notes payable, interest rates of 5.84%5.00% to
7.52%, payable through 2019 . . . . . . . . $ 886 $ 201
Floating rate notes, interest rates of
LIBOR plus 0.75% to 1.25%, Eurodollar
plus 1.0%, or Commercial Paper,
payable through 2009. . . . . . . . . . . . 223 174
Notes payable, interest rates of 7.13% to
7.15%, payable through 1999 and floating
rates thereafter of LIBOR plus 2%,
payable through 2011. . . . . . . . . . . . 86 91
Notes payable, interest rates of 8.0% to
9.97%, payable through 2019 . . . . . . . . $ 325 $ 21866 124
Revolving credit facility totaling $160
million, floating interest rates of
LIBOR or Eurodollar plus 1.125%, payable
through 1999. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 57 160
Credit facility, floating interest rate of
LIBOR or Eurodollar plus 1.125%, payable
through 2002. . . . . . . . . . . . 275 -
Floating rate notes, interest rates of
Prime plus .5% to .75%, LIBOR plus
.75% to 3.75% or Eurodollar plus .75%
to 1.0%, payable through 2006 . . . . . . . 204 187
Revolving credit facility, floating interest
rates of LIBOR or Eurodollar plus 1.125%,
payable through 1999. . . . . . . . . . . . 160 - Notes payable, interest rates of 7.13% to
7.15% payable through 1999 and floating
rates thereafter of LIBOR plus 2%,
payable through 2011. . . . . . . . . . . . 91 97275
Floating rate note, interest rate of LIBOR
or Eurodollar plus 1.375%, payable
through 2004. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . - 75 -
Notes payable, interest rates of 10.0% to
14.00%14.0%, payable through 2005 . . . . . . . . - 54
Floating rate notes, interest rates of
LIBOR plus 2.50% to 3.75%, payable
through 2005. . . . . . . . 54 178
Floating rate notes, interest rates of
Eurodollar plus 1.75% to 2.0% or Prime
plus 0.75% to 1.0% payable through 2003. . . . . . . . - 32030
Other. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . - 2 4
Unsecured
Senior notes payable, interest rate of 9.5%, payable
through 2001. . . . . . . . . $. . . . . . . 250 $ 250
Credit facility, floating interest rate
of LIBOR or Eurodollar plus 1.125%,
payable through 2002. . . . . . . . . . . . 245 -
Convertible subordinated notes, interest
rate of 6.75%, payable through 2006 . . . . 230 230
Senior notes payable, interest rate of
8.0%, payable through 2005. . . . . . . . . 200 -
Notes payable, interest ratesrate of 8.38% to
12%8.125%,
payable through 20012008. . . . . . . . . . 2 78. . 110 -
Floating rate note, interest rate of LIBOR
or Eurodollar plus 1.375%, payable
through 2004. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 74 -
Other. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 724 3
2,451 1,669 1,569
Less: current maturities. . . . . . . . . . 184 243 201
Total. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $2,267 $1,426 $1,368
As ofAt December 31, 1998 and 1997, and 1996, the Prime, LIBOR and Eurodollar rates
associated with Continental's indebtedness approximated 8.5%5.1% and 8.3%,
5.8% and 5.6%,5.1% and 5.8% and 5.6%, respectively. The Commercial Paper rate
was 5.5% as of December 31, 1998.
A majority of Continental's property and equipment is subject to
agreements securing indebtedness of Continental.
In July 1997, Continental entered into a $575 million credit
facility (the "Credit Facility"), including a $275 million term
loan, the proceeds of which were loaned to CMI to repay its
existing $320 million secured term loan. In connection with this
prepayment, Continental recorded a $4 million after tax
extraordinary losscharge relating to early extinguishment of debt. The
Credit Facility also includes a $225 million revolving credit
facility with a commitment fee of 0.25% per annum on the unused
portion, and a $75 million term loan commitment with a current
floating interest rate of Libor or Eurodollar plus 1.375%. At
December 31, 1998 and 1997, no borrowings were outstanding under
the $225 million revolving credit facility. During 1998, the
Credit Facility became unsecured due to an upgrade of Continental's
credit rating by Standard and Poor's Corporation.
The Credit Facility is secured by substantially all of CMI's assets
(other than aircraft subject to other financing arrangements) but does not contain any financial covenants
relating to CMI other than covenants restricting CMI's incurrence
of certain indebtedness and pledge or sale of assets. In addition,
the Credit Facility contains certain financial covenants applicable
to Continental and prohibits Continental from granting a security
interest on certain of its international route authorities and domestic slots.authorities.
In April 1997, Continental entered into a $1601998, the Company completed an offering of $187 million floating
rate secured revolving credit facility (the "Facility"). The
revolving loans made under the Facility areof
pass-through certificates to be used to make certain
predelivery paymentsrefinance the debt related
to The Boeing Company ("Boeing") for new
Boeing14 aircraft currently owned by Continental. In connection with
this refinancing, Continental recorded a $4 million after tax
extraordinary charge to be delivered through December 1999. Asconsolidated earnings in the second quarter
of December 31, 1997,1998 related to the Facility had been fully drawn.early extinguishment of such debt.
At December 31, 1997,1998, under the most restrictive provisions of the
Company's debt and credit facility agreements, the Company had a
minimum cash balance requirement of $600 million, a minimum net
worth requirement of $613$758 million and was restricted from paying
cash dividends in excess of $350$533 million.
In March 1996, the Company issued $230 million of 6-3/4%
Convertible Subordinated Notes (the "Notes"). The Notes are
convertible into shares of Class B common stock prior to their
maturity date, April 15, 2006, at a conversion price of $30.20$30.195 per
share. The Notes are redeemable at the option of the Company on or
after April 15, 1999, at specified redemption prices.
Maturities of long-term debt due over the next five years are as
follows (in millions):
Year ending December 31,
1998. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $243
1999. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 159$184
2000. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 152182
2001. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 394419
2002. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 170236
2003. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 122
NOTE 4 - LEASES
Continental leases certain aircraft and other assets under long-
term lease arrangements. Other leased assets include real
property, airport and terminal facilities, sales offices,
maintenance facilities, training centers and general offices. Most
leases also include renewal options, and some aircraft leases
include purchase options.
At December 31, 1997,1998, the scheduled future minimum lease payments
under capital leases and the scheduled future minimum lease rental
payments required under aircraft and engine operating leases, that
have initial or remaining noncancellable lease terms in excess of
one year, are as follows (in millions):
Capital Operating
Leases Leases
Year ending December 31,
1998. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 55 $ 658
1999. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 52 593
2000. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 41 582
2001. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 41 564
2002. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 15 482
Later years . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 26 3,007
Total minimum lease payments . . . . . . . . 230 $5,886
Less: amount representing interest. . . . . 48
Present value of capital leases. . . . . . . 182
Less: current maturities of capital
leases. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 40
Long-term capital leases . . . . . . . . . . $142
Capital Operating
Leases Leases
Year ending December 31,
1999. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 66 $ 738
2000. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 55 729
2001. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 56 711
2002. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 30 637
2003. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 24 575
Later years . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 98 4,818
Total minimum lease payments . . . . . . . . 329 $8,208
Less: amount representing interest. . . . . 69
Present value of capital leases. . . . . . . 260
Less: current maturities of capital
leases. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 47
Long-term capital leases . . . . . . . . . . $213
Not included in the above operating lease table is $236approximately
$404 million inof annual average minimum lease payments for each of
the next five years relating to non-aircraft leases, principally
airport and terminal facilities and related equipment.
Continental is the guarantor of $325$422 million aggregate principal
amount of tax-exempt special facilities revenue bonds. These
bonds, issued by various airport municipalities, are payable solely
from rentals paid by Continental under long-term agreements with
the respective governing bodies.
At December 31, 1998, the Company, including Express, had 350 and
31 aircraft under operating and capital leases, respectively.
These leases have remaining lease terms ranging from one month to
21 years.
The Company's total rental expense for all operating leases, net of
sublease rentals, was $922 million, $787 million and $719 million
in 1998, 1997 and $720 million
in 1997, 1996, and 1995, respectively.
During 1997, the Company acquired 10 aircraft previously leased by
it. Aircraft maintenance expense in the second quarter of 1997 was
reduced by approximately $16 million due to the reversal of
reserves that arewere no longer required as a result of the
transaction.
NOTE 5 - FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS AND RISK MANAGEMENT
As part of the Company's risk management program, Continental uses
or used a variety of financial instruments, including petroleum
call options, petroleum swaps, jet fuel purchase commitments,
foreign currency average rate options, and interest
rate swapforeign currency forward
contracts and interest rate cap agreements. The Company does not
hold or issue derivative financial instruments for trading
purposes.
Effective October 1, 1998, the Company adopted Statement of
Financial Accounting Standards No. 133 - "Accounting for Derivative
Instruments and Hedging Activities" ("SFAS 133"). SFAS 133
requires the Company to recognize all derivatives on the balance
sheet at fair value. Derivatives that are not hedges must be
adjusted to fair value through income. If the derivative is a
hedge, depending on the nature of the hedge, changes in the fair
value of derivatives are either offset against the change in fair
value of assets, liabilities, or firm commitments through earnings
or recognized in other comprehensive income until the hedged item
is recognized in earnings. The ineffective portion of a
derivative's change in fair value is immediately recognized in
earnings. The adoption of SFAS 133 on October 1, 1998 did not have
a material impact on results of operations but resulted in the
cumulative effect of an accounting change of $2 million pre-tax
being recognized as income in other comprehensive income.
Notional Amounts and Credit Exposure of Derivatives
The notional amounts of derivative financial instruments summarized
below do not represent amounts exchanged between parties and,
therefore, are not a measure of the Company's exposure resulting
from its use of derivatives. The amounts exchanged are calculated
based upon the notional amounts as well as other terms of the
instruments, which relate to interest rates, exchange rates andor
other indices.
The Company is exposed to credit losses in the event of non-
performance by counterparties to these financial instruments, but
it does not expect any of the counterparties to fail to meet itstheir
obligations. To manage credit risks, the Company selects
counterparties based on credit ratings, limits its exposure to a
single counterparty under defined Company guidelines, and monitors
the market position with each counterparty.
Fuel Price Risk Management
The Company has entered intouses a combination of petroleum call optionoptions, petroleum
swap contracts, and jet fuel purchase commitments to provide some
short-term protection against a sharp increase in jet fuel prices.
The petroleum call option contractsThese instruments generally cover the Company's forecasted jet fuel
needs for three to six months.
Gains, if any, on these optionThe Company accounts for the call options and swap contracts as
cash flow hedges. In accordance with SFAS 133, such financial
instruments are marked-to-market with the offset to other
comprehensive income and then subsequently recognized as a
component of fuel expense when the underlying fuel being hedged is
used (deferral method).used. The ineffective portion of these call and swap agreements is
determined based on the correlation between West Texas Intermediate
Crude Oil prices and jet fuel prices, which was not material for
the quarter ended December 31, 1998.
At December 31, 1997,1998, the Company had petroleum call optionswap contracts
outstanding with an aggregate notional amount of $200 million. Theapproximately $82
million and a fair value of approximately $6 million (loss), which
has been recorded in other current liabilities with the Company's
call option contracts at December 31, 1997, representingoffset to
other comprehensive income, net of applicable income taxes. The
loss will be recognized in earnings within the amount
the Company would receive if the option contracts were closed, was
immaterial. During the year ended December 31, 1996, thenext six months.
The Company recognized gains of approximately $65 million under
this risk reduction strategy.strategy in 1996. Such gains were classified
as a reduction in aircraft fuel expense in the accompanying
consolidated statements of operations.
Additionally, as of December 31, 1998, the Company had entered into
jet fuel purchase commitments of approximately $53 million that
relate to jet fuel to be delivered and used during the first
quarter of 1999.
Foreign Currency Exchange Risk Management
CMI purchasesThe Company uses a combination of foreign currency average rate
option and forward contracts that
effectively enable it to sellhedge against the currency risk
associated with Japanese yen expected to be received
from yen-denominateddenominated ticket sales overfor the next
nine to twelve months at specified dollar amounts.months. The average rate option and forward
contracts have only nominal intrinsic value at the time of
purchase.
These contracts
The Company accounts for these instruments as cash flow hedges. In
accordance with SFAS 133, such financial instruments are designatedmarked-to-
market with the offset to other comprehensive income and effective as hedges of probable monthly yen-
denominated sales transactions, which otherwise would expose the
Company to foreign currency risk. Gains, if any, on these average
rate option contracts are deferred andthen
subsequently recognized as a component of passenger revenue when
the related saleunderlying sales transaction is recognized (deferral
method).as revenue. The
Company measures hedge effectiveness of average rate options and
forward contracts based on the forward price of the underlying
commodity. Hedge ineffectiveness was not material during the
quarter ended December 31, 1998.
At December 31, 1997, CMI1998, the Company had average rate option and
forward contracts outstanding with aan aggregate notional amount of
approximately $78 million and $76 million, respectively. The fair
value of $266 million; the
related fair value, representing the amount CMI would receive to
terminate the agreements,these instruments was immaterial. During the year ended$3 million (loss) as of December 31,
1997,1998 which has been recorded in other current liabilities with the
Companyoffset to other comprehensive income, net of applicable income
taxes. The loss will be recognized gains of approximately
$10 million under these option contracts.in earnings within the next
twelve months.
Interest Rate Risk Management
The Company entered into an interest rate cap agreement to reduce
the impact of potential increases in interest rates on a floating rate bank financing.debt. The
interest rate cap agreement has a notional valueamount of $142$125 million as of
December 31, 1998 and is effective through July 31, 2001. The
Company accounts for the interest rate cap limitsas a cash flow hedge
whereby the amountfair value of potential
increasethe interest rate cap is reflected as an
asset in the Eurodollar or Prime rate componentaccompanying consolidated balance sheet with the
offset, net of the floating
rateany hedge ineffectiveness (which is not material)
recorded as interest expense, to a maximum of 9% over the term of the contract.other comprehensive income. The
fair value is immaterial. Payments to be received as a result of the interest rate cap agreement are accruedwas not material as a reduction inof December
31, 1998. As interest expense (accrual method)on the underlying hedged debt is
recognized, corresponding amounts are removed from other
comprehensive income and charged to interest expense. Such amounts
were not material during 1998.
Accumulated Derivative Gains or Losses
The following table summarizes activity in other comprehensive
income related to derivatives classified as cash flow hedges held
by the Company during the period October 1 (the date of the
Company's adoption of SFAS 133) through December 31, 1998 (in
millions):
Cumulative effect of adopting SFAS 133 as
of October 1, 1998, net . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 1
(Gains)/losses reclassified into earnings from
other comprehensive income, net . . . . . . . . -
Change in fair value of derivatives, net . . . . (7)
Accumulated derivative loss included in other
comprehensive income as of December 31, 1998,
net . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ (6)
Fair Value of Other Financial Instruments
(a) Cash equivalents -
Cash equivalents consist primarily of commercial paper with
original maturities of three months or less and approximate
fair value due to their short maturity.
(b) Investment in Equity Securities -
Continental's investment in America West Holdings Corporation
("America West"West Holdings") is classified as available-for-sale
and carried at an aggregate market value of $9$3 million and
$8$9 million at December 31, 19971998 and 1996,1997, respectively.
Included in stockholders' equity at December 31, 1998 and 1997
and 1996
is aare net unrealized gains of $1 million and $4 million,
respectively.
In June 1998, the Company sold its remaining 317,140 shares of
America West Holdings Class B common stock realizing net
proceeds of approximately $8.9 million and recognizing a gain
of $4$6 million. The gain is included in Other, net in the
accompanying Consolidated Statements of Operations.
In February 1996, Continental sold approximately 1.4 million
of the 1.8 million shares it owned in America West Holdings,
realizing net proceeds of $25 million and recognizing a gain
of $13 million. In May 1996, the Company sold all of its
802,860 America West Holdings warrants, realizing net proceeds
of $7 million and recognizing a gain of $5 million. The gains
are included in Other, net in the accompanying Consolidated
Statements of Operations.
In May 1998, the Company acquired a 49% interest in Compania
Panamena de Aviacion, S.A. ("COPA") for $53 million. The
investment is accounted for under the equity method of
accounting. As of December 31, 1998, the excess of the amount
at which the investment is carried and the amount of
underlying equity in the net assets was $43 million. This
difference is being amortized over the investment's estimated
useful life of 40 years.
As of December 31, 1998, Continental had a 12.4% interest in
AMADEUS Global Travel Distribution S.A. ("AMADEUS") with a
carrying value of $95 million. Since a readily determinable
market value does not exist for the Company's investment in
AMADEUS, (see Note 11), the investment is carried at cost.
(c) Debt -
The fair value of the Company's debt with a carrying value of
$1.98 billion and $1.49 billion and $1.36 billion as ofat December 31, 19971998 and 1996,1997,
respectively, estimated based on the discounted amount of
future cash flows using the current incremental rate of
borrowing for a similar liability or market prices,
approximates $1.47approximate $1.88 billion and $1.37$1.47 billion, respectively.
The fair value of the remaining debt (with a carrying value of
$179$473 million and $209$179 million, respectively, and primarily
relating to aircraft modification notes and various loans with
immaterial balances) was not practicable to estimate due to
the large number and small dollar amounts of these notes.
(d) Preferred Securities of Trust -
As of December 31, 1997,1998, the fair value of Continental's 8-
1/2% Convertible Trust Originated Preferred Securities
("TOPrS") (with a carrying value of $242$111 million), estimated
based on market prices, approximates $514approximated $159 million. The
carrying value of the TOPrS was $242 million and the fair
value approximated $332 million$514 as of December 31, 1996.1997. See Note 6.
NOTE 6 - PREFERRED SECURITIES OF TRUST
Continental Airlines Finance Trust, a Delaware statutory business
trust (the "Trust") with respect to which the Company ownsowned all of
the common trust securities, had 4,986,5002,298,327 and 4,997,000 8-1/2%4,986,500 TOPrS
outstanding at December 31, 1998 and 1997, respectively. In
November 1998, the Company exercised its right and 1996, respectively.called for
redemption approximately half of its outstanding TOPrS. The TOPrS
have a liquidation value of $50 per preferred security and
arewere convertible at any time at the option of the holder into shares of Class B common stock at a
conversion rateprice of 2.068 shares of
Class B common stock for each preferred security (equivalent to $24.18 per share of Class B common stock), subject to adjustment in
certain circumstances.stock. As
a result of the call for redemption, 2,688,173 TOPrS were converted
into 5,558,649 shares of Class B common stock. In December 1998,
the Company called for redemption the remaining outstanding TOPrS.
As a result of the second call, the remaining 2,298,327 TOPrS were
converted into 4,752,522 shares of Class B common stock during
January 1999.
Distributions on the preferred securities arewere payable by the Trust
at the annual rate of 8-1/2% of the liquidation value of $50 per
preferred security and are included in Distributions on Preferred
Securities of Trust in the accompanying Consolidated Statements of
Operations. The proceeds of the private
placement, which totaled $242At December 31, 1998, outstanding TOPrS totaling $111
million (net of $8 million of
underwriting commissions and expense) are included in Continental-
ObligatedContinental-Obligated Mandatorily
Redeemable Preferred Securities of Subsidiary Trust Holding Solely
Convertible Subordinated Debentures in the accompanying
Consolidated Balance Sheets.
The sole assets of the trust arewere 8-1/2% Convertible Subordinated
Deferrable Interest Debentures ("Convertible Subordinated
Debentures") with an aggregate principal amount of $249$115 million issued by the Company and which mature onat
December 1, 2020. The
Convertible Subordinated Debentures are redeemable by Continental,
in whole or in part, on or after December 1, 1998 at designated
redemption prices. If Continental redeems the Convertible
Subordinated Debentures, the Trust must redeem the TOPrS on a pro
rata basis having an aggregate liquidation value equal to the
aggregate principal amount of the Convertible Subordinated
Debentures redeemed. Otherwise, the TOPrS will be redeemed upon
maturity of the Convertible Subordinated Debentures, unless
previously converted.
Taking into consideration the Company's obligations under (i) the
Preferred Securities Guarantee relating to the TOPrS, (ii) the
Indenture relating to the Convertible Subordinated Debentures to
pay all debts and obligations and all costs and expenses of the
Trust (other than U.S. withholding taxes) and (iii) the Indenture,
the Declaration relating to the TOPrS and the Convertible
Subordinated Debentures, Continental has fully and unconditionally
guaranteed payment of (i) the distributions on the TOPrS, (ii) the
amount payable upon redemption of the TOPrS, and (iii) the
liquidation amount of the TOPrS.31, 1998.
The Convertible Subordinated Debentures and related income
statement effects are eliminated in the Company's consolidated
financial statements.
NOTE 7 - REDEEMABLE PREFERRED, PREFERRED, TREASURY AND COMMON STOCK
Redeemable Preferred and Preferred Stock
During the yearsyear ended December 31, 1997, and 1996, the Company's board of
directors declared and issued 13,165 and 49,134 additional shares respectively, of Series A
12% Cumulative Preferred Stock ("Series A 12% Preferred") in lieu
of cash dividends. In April 1997, Continental redeemed for cash
all of the 460,247 shares of its Series A 12% Preferred then
outstanding for $100 per share plus accrued dividends thereon. The
redemption price, including accrued dividends, totaled $48 million.
Redeemable preferred stock consisted of 1,000,000 authorized shares
of Series A 12% Preferred with 447,082 shares issued and
outstanding at December 31, 1996.
Continental has 10 million shares of authorized preferred stock,
none of which werewas outstanding as of December 31, 19971998 or 1996.
1997.
Common Stock
Continental has two classes of common stock issued and outstanding,
Class A common stock, par value $.01 per share ("Class A common
stock"), and Class B common stock. Holders of shares of Class A
common stock and Class B common stock are entitled to receive
dividends when and if declared by the Company's board of directors.
Each share of Class A common stock is entitled to 10 votes per
share and each share of Class B common stock is entitled to one
vote per share. In addition, Continental has authorized 50 million
shares of Class D common stock, par value $.01 per share, none of
which wereis outstanding.
The Company's Certificate of Incorporation permits shares of the
Company's Class A common stock to be converted into an equal number
of shares of Class B common stock. During 1998 and 1997, 12,200
and 1996, 900,536
and 3,322,112 shares of the Company's Class A common stock,
respectively, were so converted.
Treasury Stock
During 1998, the Company's Board of Directors authorized the
expenditure of up to $300 million to repurchase shares of the
Company's Class A and Class B common stock or securities
convertible into Class B common stock. No time limit was placed on
the duration of the repurchase program. Subject to applicable
securities law, such purchases occur at times and in amounts that
the Company deems appropriate. As of December 31, 1998, the
Company had repurchased 4,452,700 shares of Class B common stock
for $223 million.
Stockholder Rights Plan
Effective November 20, 1998, the Company adopted a stockholder
rights plan (the "Rights Plan") in connection with the disposition
by Air Partners, L.P. ("Air Partners") of its interest in the
Company to an affiliate of Northwest Airlines, Inc. (together with
such affiliate, "Northwest").
The rights become exercisable upon the earlier of (i) the tenth day
following a public announcement or public disclosure of facts
indicating that a person or group of affiliated or associated
persons has acquired beneficial ownership of 15% or more of the
total number of votes entitled to be cast generally by the holders
of the common stock of the Company then outstanding, voting
together as a single class (such person or group being an
"Acquiring Person"), or (ii) the tenth business day (or such later
date as may be determined by action of the Board of Directors prior
to such time as any person becomes an Acquiring Person) following
the commencement of, or announcement of an intention to make, a
tender offer or exchange offer the consummation of which would
result in any person becoming an Acquiring Person. Certain persons
and entities related to the Company, Air Partners or Northwest at
the time the Rights Plan was adopted are exempt from the definition
of "Acquiring Person."
The rights will expire on November 20, 2008 unless extended or
unless the rights are earlier redeemed or exchanged by the Company.
Subject to certain adjustments, if any person becomes an Acquiring
Person, each holder of a right, other than rights beneficially
owned by the Acquiring Person and its affiliates and associates
(which rights will thereafter be void), will thereafter have the
right to receive, upon exercise thereof, that number of Class B
Common Shares having a market value of two times the exercise price
($200, subject to adjustment) of the right.
If at any time after a person becomes an Acquiring Person, (i) the
Company merges into any other person, (ii) any person merges into
the Company and all of the outstanding common stock does not remain
outstanding after such merger, or (iii) the Company sells 50% or
more of its consolidated assets or earning power, each holder of a
right (other than the Acquiring Person and its affiliates and
associates) will have the right to receive, upon the exercise
thereof, that number of shares of common stock of the acquiring
corporation (including the Company as successor thereto or as the
surviving corporation) which at the time of such transaction will
have a market value of two times the exercise price of the right.
At any time after any person becomes an Acquiring Person, and prior
to the acquisition by any person or group of a majority of the
Company's voting power, the Board of Directors may exchange the
rights (other than rights owned by such Acquiring Person which have
become void), in whole or in part, at an exchange ratio of one
share of Class B common stock per right (subject to adjustment).
At any time prior to any person becoming an Acquiring Person, the
Board of Directors may redeem the rights at a price of $.001 per
right. The Rights Plan may be amended by the Board of Directors
without the consent of the holders of the rights, except that from
and after such time as any person becomes an Acquiring Person no
such amendment may adversely affect the interests of the holders of
the rights (other than the Acquiring Person and its affiliates and
associates). Until a right is exercised, the holder thereof, as
such, will have no rights as a stockholder of the Company,
including, without limitation, the right to vote or to receive
dividends.
Warrants
As of December 31, 1997, the Company had outstanding 3,039,468
Class A Warrants and 308,343 Class B Warrants (collectively, the
"Warrants"). As of such date, all of the Class A Warrants were
held by Air Partners, L.P. ("Air Partners"), and all of the Class
B Warrants were held by a limited partner of Air Partners.Warrants. The Warrants entitlewarrants
entitled the holder to purchase one share of Class A common stock
or Class B common stock as follows: (i) 2,298,134 Class A Warrants
and 186,134 Class B Warrants havewith an exercise price of $7.50 per
share, and (ii) 741,334 Class A Warrants and 122,209 Class B
Warrants havewith an exercise price of $15$15.00 per share. TheDuring 1998,
all remaining Class A and Class B Warrants expire on April 27, 1998.outstanding were
exercised.
On June 2, 1997, the Company purchased for $94 million from Air Partners warrants
to purchase 3,842,542 shares of Class B common stock (representing a portion of the total warrants held by Air
Partners). The purchase price representedfor $94
million, the intrinsic value of the warrants (the difference
between the closing market price of the Class B common stock on May
28, 1997 ($34.25) and the applicable exercise price).
On November 21, 1996, Air Partners exercised its right to sell to
the Company, and the Company subsequently purchased, for $50
million, Warrants to purchase 2,614,379 shares of Class B common
stock (representing a portion of the total Warrants held by Air
Partners) pursuant to an agreement with the Company entered into
earlier in 1996
with the Company.
On September 29, 1995, Continental purchased 2,735,760 Class A
Warrants and 9,699,510 Class B Warrants for an aggregate purchase
price of $56 million (including a waiver fee of $5 million paid to
a major creditor of the Company).1996.
NOTE 8 - STOCK PLANS AND AWARDS
Stock Options
On May 21, 1998, the stockholders of the Company approved the
Continental Airlines, Inc. 1998 Stock Incentive Plan (the "98
Incentive Plan") under which the Company may issue shares of
restricted Class B common stock or grant options to purchase shares
of Class B common stock to non-employee directors and employees of
the Company or its subsidiaries. Subject to adjustment as provided
in the 98 Incentive Plan, the aggregate number of shares of Class
B common stock that may be issued under the 98 Incentive Plan may
not exceed 5,500,000 shares, which may be originally issued or
treasury shares or a combination thereof. The maximum number of
shares of Class B common stock that may be subject to options
granted to any one individual during any calendar year may not
exceed 750,000 shares. In early December 1998, the Company offered
certain employees who were granted options during the period from
May 21, 1998 to November 20, 1998 (excluding the Company's
executive officers, certain other officers and members of its
Board) the opportunity to exchange such options for a lesser number
of new options bearing an exercise price equal to the closing price
of the Class B common stock on the date of grant, which was lower
than that of the exchanged options. Employees who exchanged their
options forfeited the vesting on their old options and received 65
new options for every 100 old options exchanged. As a result,
1,874,000 old options were exchanged for 1,218,100 new options.
The new options are subject to a new four-year vesting schedule
commencing on the date of grant. The exchange did not result in
recognition of compensation expense. The total shares remaining
available for grant under the 98 Incentive Plan at December 31,
1998 was 990,000. Stock options granted under the 98 Incentive
Plan generally vest over a period of four years and have a term of
five years.
On May 16, 1997, the stockholders of the Company approved the
Continental Airlines, Inc. 1997 Stock Incentive Plan, as amended
(the "97 Incentive Plan"), under which the Company may award
restricted stock or grant options to purchase shares of Class B
common stock to non-employee directors of the Company and employees
of the Company or its subsidiaries. Subject to adjustment as
provided in the 97 Incentive Plan, the aggregate number of shares
of Class B common stock that may be issued under the 97 Incentive
Plan may not exceed 2,000,000 shares, which may be originally
issued or treasury shares or a combination thereof. The maximum
number of shares of Class B common stock that may be subject to
options granted to any one individual during any calendar year may
not exceed 200,000 shares (subject to adjustment as provided in the
97 Incentive Plan). The total shares remaining available for grant
under the 97 Incentive Plan at December 31, 19971998 was 604,000.563,988.
Stock options granted under the 97 Incentive Plan generally vest
over a period of three years and have a term of five years.
Under the Continental Airlines, Inc. 1994 Incentive Equity Plan, as
amended (the "94 Incentive Plan" and, together with the 97
Incentive Plan and the 98 Incentive Plan, the "Incentive Plans"),
key officers and employees of the Company and its subsidiaries
received stock options and/or restricted stock. The 94 Incentive
Plan also provided for each outside director to receive on the day
following the annual stockholders' meeting options to purchase
5,000 shares of Class B common stock. The maximum number of shares
of Class B common stock that may be issued under the 94 Incentive
Plan willmay not in the aggregate exceed 9,000,000. The total
remaining shares available for grant under the 94 Incentive Plan at
December 31, 19971998 was 141,671. In 1995, the 94 Incentive Plan was amended to provide for
the exchange and repricing of substantially all the outstanding
stock options for new options bearing a shorter exercise term and
generally exercisable at a price lower than that of the cancelled
options, subject to certain conditions. The exercise price for the
repriced options equaled the market value per share on the date of
grant ($8.00). As a result of the repricing, stock options
generally vest over a period of three years and have a term of five
years.201,754.
Under the terms of the 97 and 94 Incentive Plans, a change of control would
result in all outstanding options under these plans becoming
exercisable in full and restrictions on restricted shares being
terminated (see Note 17).terminated. On November 20, 1998, Air Partners disposed of its
interest in the Company to Northwest, resulting in a change of
control under the terms of the 97 Incentive Plan and the 94
Incentive Plan. As a result, all outstanding options and
restricted stock under these plans became exercisable and fully
vested, respectively.
The table on the following page summarizes stock option
transactions pursuant to the Company's 94 and 97 Incentive Plans (share data
in thousands):
1998 1997 1996 1995
Weighted- Weighted- Weighted-
Average Average Average
Options Exercise Price Options Exercise Price Options Exercise Price
Outstanding at
Beginning of
Year. . . . . . 5,998 $22.62 5,809 $17.37 4,769 $ 8.41
3,443 $10.19
Granted* . . . . 6,504 $43.75 1,968 $29.34 3,307 $25.07
4,322 $ 8.43
Exercised . . . (807) $19.53 (1,582) $11.72 (1,747) $ 8.23
(361) $ 9.25
Cancelled. . . . (195)(2,012) $55.18 (197) $22.49 (520) $14.83 (2,635) $10.58
Outstanding at
End of Year . . 6,0009,683 $30.31 5,998 $22.62 5,809 $17.37 4,769 $ 8.41
Options
exercisable
at end of
year. . . . . . 1,235 -5,174 $23.56 1,229 $20.61 656 - 1,079 -$11.18
*The option price for all stock options is equal to 100% of the fair market value at the date
of grant.
Options granted during 1995 include the grant of repriced options; options cancelled during
1995 include the cancellation of the higher priced options.
The following tables summarize the range of exercise prices and the
weighted average remaining contractual life of the options
outstanding and the range of exercise prices for the options
exercisable at December 31, 19971998 (share data in thousands):
Options Outstanding
Weighted
Average
Remaining
Range of Contractual Weighted Average
Exercise Prices Outstanding Life Exercise Price
$3.88-$8.00 1,178 3.10 $7.54915 2.25 $7.46
$8.19-$22.38 389 3.91 $16.59
$22.56-28.19 1,881 2.44 $22.68
$28.25-$23.00 1,328 3.12 $22.99
$23.25-34.75 3,443 3.75 $29.23
$34.88-$27.88 467 3.82 $25.63
$27.94-35.00 2,306 4.90 $35.00
$35.31-$48.88 2,638 4.08 $29.5356.81 1,138 4.62 $55.05
$3.88-$48.88 6,000 3.64 $22.62
56.81 9,683 3.73 $30.31
Options Exercisable
Range of Weighted Average
Exercise Prices Exercisable Exercise Price
$3.88-$8.00 287915 $ 7.637.46
$8.19-$22.38 186 $16.55
$22.56-28.19 1,881 $22.68
$28.25-$23.00 359 $22.99
$23.25-34.75 2,222 $29.25
$34.88-$27.88 77 $25.05
$27.94-35.00 2 $35.00
$35.31-$48.88 326 $30.5356.81 154 $47.72
$3.88-$48.88 1,235 $20.5756.81 5,174 $23.56
Restricted Stock
The 97 Incentive Plan permitsPlans permit awards of restricted stock to
participants, subject to one or more restrictions, including a
restriction period, and a purchase price, if any, to be paid by the
participant. In connection withUnder the plan,98 Incentive Plan, the 97 Incentive Plan
and the 94 Incentive Plan, 250,000, 100,000 and 600,000 shares,
respectively, have been authorized for issuance, as restricted stock (subject to adjustment
as provided in the 97 Incentive Plan). As of December 31, 1997, no
awards of restricted stock had been made.
The 94 Incentive Plan also permitted awards of restricted stock to
participants, subject to one or more restrictions, including a
restriction period,which 250,000,
100,000 and a purchase price, if any, to be paid by the
participant. In connection with the plan, 600,000 shares were
authorized for issuance as restricted stock. As of December 31,
1997, 35,000 shares were available for grant as restricted stock.
at December 31,
1998.
Additionally, on March 4, 1994, the Board approved a one-time grant
of 2,014,000 shares of restricted Class B common stock to
substantially all employees at or below the manager level. These
shares were issued at no cost to the employees and vestvested in 25
percent increments on each of January 2, 1995, 1996, 1997 and 1998.
Employee Stock Purchase Plans
On May 16, 1997, the stockholders of the Company approved the
Continental Airlines, Inc. 1997 Employee Stock Purchase Plan (the
"97 Stock Purchase Plan"). Under the 97 Stock Purchase Plan, all
employees of the Company including CMI and Express, may purchase shares of Class B common
stock of the Company at 85% of the lower of the fair market value
on the first day of the option period or the last day of the option
period. Subject to adjustment, a maximum of 1,750,000 shares of
Class B common stock are authorized for issuance under the 97 Stock
Purchase Plan. In January 1999, 132,928 shares of Class B common
stock were issued for $28.47 per share relating to contributions
made in fourth quarter of 1998. During 1998 and 1997, 305,978 and
148,186 shares of Class B common stock were issued at prices
ranging from $29.33 to $49.41 in 1998 and $23.38 to $29.33.$29.33 in 1997.
Under the Continental Airlines, Inc. 1994 Employee Stock Purchase
Plan, as amended (the "94 Stock Purchase Plan"), which terminated
on December 31, 1996, substantially all employees of the Company
could purchase shares of Class B common stock at 85% of the lower
of the fair market value on the first or last business day of a
calendar quarter. Subject to adjustment, a maximum of
8,000,000 shares of Class B common stock were authorized for
purchase under the 94 Stock Purchase Plan. During 1997, 70,706
shares were issued at a price of $19.55 per share that related to
contributions made in the fourth quarter of 1996. During 1996 and
1995, 70,706, 191,809 and 518,428 shares, respectively, of Class B
common stock were issued at a price of $19.55 in 1997 and at prices
ranging from $15.81 to $23.96 in 1996 and $4.31 to $10.63 in 1995
in connection with the 94 Stock Purchase Plan.
Pro Forma SFAS 123 Results
Pro forma information regarding net income and earnings per share
has been determined as if the Company had accounted for its
employee stock options and purchase rights under the fair value
method of SFAS 123. The fair value for these options was estimated
at the date of grant using a Black-Scholes option pricing model
with the following weighted-average assumptions for 1998, 1997 1996 and
1995,1996, respectively: risk-free interest rates of 6.1%4.9%, 5.8%6.1% and
6.2%5.8%; dividend yields of 0%; volatility factors of the expected
market price of the Company's common stock of 40% for 1998, 34% for
1997 and 39% for 1996 and 1995;1996; and a weighted-average expected life of the
option of 3.0 years, 2.5 years 2.6 years and 2.32.6 years. The weighted average
grant date fair value of the stock options granted in 1998, 1997
and 1996 was $13.84, $7.87 and 1995 was
$7.87, $7.55 and $2.35,per option, respectively.
The fair value of the purchase rights under the Stock Purchase
Plans was also estimated using the Black-Scholes model with the
following weighted-average assumptions for 1998, 1997 1996 and 1995,1996,
respectively: risk free interest rates of 5.2%4.7%, 5.2% and 5.8%5.2%;
dividend yields of 0%; expected volatility of 40% for 1998, 34% for
1997 and 39% for 1996 and 1995;1996; and an expected life of .25 years for 1998,
.33 years for 1997 and 0.25.25 years for 1996 and
1995.1996. The weighted-average
fair value of thosethe purchase rights granted in 1998, 1997 and 1996
was $9.10, $7.38 and 1995 was $7.38, $5.75, and $1.89, respectively.
The Black-Scholes option valuation model was developed for use in
estimating the fair value of traded options which have no vesting
restrictions and are fully transferrable. In addition, option
valuation models require the input of highly subjective assumptions
including the expected stock price volatility. Because the
Company's employee stock options and purchase rights have
characteristics significantly different from those of traded
options, and because changes in the subjective input assumptions
can materially affect the fair value estimate, in management's
opinion, the existing models do not necessarily provide a reliable
single measure of the fair value of its employee stock options and
purchase rights.
Assuming that the Company had accounted for its employee stock
options and purchase rights using the fair value method and
amortized the resulting amount to expense over the options' vesting
period net income would have been reduced by $18 million, $11
million $9
million and $5$9 million for the years ended December 31, 1998, 1997
1996
and 1995,1996, respectively. Basic EPS would have been reduced by 30
cents, 18 cents 17 cents and 1017 cents for the years ended December 31, 1998,
1997 1996 and 1995,1996, respectively, and diluted EPS would have been
reduced by 23 cents, 14 cents 11 cents and 611 cents for the same periods,
respectively. The pro forma effect on net income is not
representative of the pro forma effects on net income in future
years because it did not take into consideration pro forma
compensation expense related to grants made prior to 1995.
NOTE 9 - ACCUMULATED OTHER COMPREHENSIVE INCOME
The components of accumulated other comprehensive income are as
follows (in millions):
Minimum Unrealized Loss on
Pension Gain/(Loss) Derivative
Liability on Investments Instruments Total
Balance at
December 31, 1995 . $ (8) $ 18 $ - $ 10
Current year change
in other compre-
hensive income. . . 6 (14) - (8)
Balance at
December 31, 1996 . (2) 4 - 2
Current year change
in other compre-
hensive income. . . (4) - - (4)
Balance at
December 31, 1997 . (6) 4 - (2)
Current year change
in other compre-
hensive income. . . (76) (4) (6) (86)
Balance at
December 31, 1998 . $(82) $ - $ (6) $ (88)
NOTE 10 - EMPLOYEE BENEFIT PLANS
The Company has noncontributory defined benefit pension and defined
contribution (including 401(k) savings) plans. Substantially all
domestic employees of the Company are covered by one or more of
these plans. The benefits under the active defined benefit pension
plan are based on years of service and an employee's final average
compensation. For the years ended December 31, 1998, 1997 and
1996, and
1995, total pension expense for the defined benefit plans was $41
million, $45 million and $40 million, respectively. Total expense for the defined contribution plansplan was $8
million, $6 million and $7 million, and
$6 million, for 1997, 1996 and 1995, respectively.
Net periodic pension cost of the Company's defined benefit plans
for 1997, 1996 and 1995 included the following components (in
millions):
1997 1996 1995
Service cost - benefits earned
during the year . . . . . . . . $38 $38 $30
Interest cost on projected
benefit obligations . . . . . . 51 45 40
Loss (return) on plan assets . . (83) (63) (79)
Net amortization and deferral. . 35 25 49
Net periodic pension costs . . . $41 $45 $40
The following table sets forth the defined benefit pension plans'
fundedchange in projected benefit obligation for 1998 and 1997:
1998 1997
(in millions)
Projected benefit obligation at
beginning of year . . . . . . . . $ 846 $ 604
Service cost . . . . . . . . . . . 55 38
Interest cost. . . . . . . . . . . 69 51
Plan amendments. . . . . . . . . . 110 -
Actuarial gains, net . . . . . . . 178 176
Benefits paid. . . . . . . . . . . (28) (23)
Projected benefit obligation at
end of year . . . . . . . . . . . $1,230 $ 846
The following table sets forth the defined benefit pension plans'
change in the fair value of plan assets for 1998 and 1997:
1998 1997
(in millions)
Fair value of plan assets at
beginning of year . . . . . . . . $ 633 $ 508
Actual return on plan assets . . . 75 83
Employer contributions . . . . . . 101 65
Benefits paid. . . . . . . . . . . (28) (23)
Fair value of plan assets at
end of year . . . . . . . . . . . $ 781 $ 633
Pension cost recognized in the accompanying Consolidated Balance
Sheets is computed as follows:
1998 1997
(in millions)
Funded status amountsof the plans -
net underfunded . . . . . . . . . $ (449) $ (213)
Unrecognized net actuarial loss. . 256 93
Unrecognized prior service cost. . 113 9
Net amount recognized. . . . . . . (80) (111)
Prepaid benefit cost . . . . . . . 2 16
Accrued benefit liability. . . . . (320) (136)
Intangible asset . . . . . . . . . 113 -
Accumulated other comprehensive
income. . . . . . . . . . . . . . 125 9
Net amount recognized. . . . . . . $ (80) $ (111)
Net periodic defined benefit pension cost for 1998, 1997 and 1996
included the following components:
1998 1997 1996
(in millions)
Service cost . . . . . . . . . . . $ 55 $ 38 $ 38
Interest cost. . . . . . . . . . . 69 51 45
Expected return on plan assets . . (64) (49) (38)
Amortization of prior service
cost . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6 1 1
Amortization of unrecognized
net actuarial loss . . . . . . . 4 - -
Settlement gain. . . . . . . . . . - - (1)
Net periodic benefit cost. . . . . $ 70 $ 41 $ 45
The projected benefit obligation, accumulated benefit obligation
and the fair value of plan assets for the pension plans with
projected benefit obligations and accumulated benefit obligations
in excess of plan assets were $1.2 billion, $1.1 billion and $771
million, respectively, as of December 31, 19971998, and 1996 (in millions):
1997 1996
Accumulated Assets Accumulated Assets
Benefits Exceed Benefits Exceed
Exceed Accumulated Exceed Accumulated
Assets Benefits Assets Benefits
Actuarial present
value$762 million,
$620 million and $529 million, respectively, as of benefit
obligations:
Vested . . . . . $603 $ 83 $308 $ 91
Non-vested . . . 17 1 96 3
Accumulated
benefit
obligations . . . 620 84 404 94
Effect of
projected future
salary increases. 141 - 107 -
Projected benefit
obligation. . . . 761 84 511 94
Plan assets at
fair value. . . . 529 103 393 115
Projected benefit
obligation in
excess of (less
than) plan
assets. . . . . . 232 (19) 118 (21)
Unrecognized prior
service costs . . (9) - (9) -
Unrecognized net
gain (loss).. . . (96) 3 42 7
Additional mini-
mum liability . . 9 - 2 -
Accrued (pre-
paid) pension
liability . . . . $136 $(16) $153 $(14)
In accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting Standards
No. 87 - "Employers' Accounting for Pensions", an additional
minimum pension liability for certain plans, representing the
excess of accumulated benefits over plan assets and accrued pension
costs, was recognized at December 31,
1997 and 1996. A
corresponding amount was recognized1997.
During 1998, the Company amended its benefit plan as a separate reductionresult of
changes in benefits pursuant to stockholders' equity.new collective bargaining
agreements.
Plan assets consist primarily of equity securities (including
50,00032,500 and 100,00050,000 shares of Class B common stock)stock with a fair market
value of $1.1 million and $2.4 million as of December 31, 1998 and
1997, and 1996, respectively,respectively), long-term debt securities and short-term
investments.
The weighted average discount rate used in determining the
actuarial present value of the projected benefit obligation was
7.00% to 7.25%, 7.25% and 7.75% for 1998, 1997 and 7.25% for 1997, 1996, and 1995,
respectively. The expected long-term rate of return on assets
(which is used to calculate the Company's return on pension assets
for the current year) was 9.25% to 9.50% for 1998, and 9.25% for
each of 1997 1996 and 1995.1996. The weighted average rate of salary
increases was 4.9%5.30% for 1998, and 4.90% for each of 1997 1996
and 1995. In1996.
The 1983 Group Annuity Mortality Table (GAM 83) was used to develop
the 1997 Continental changed from theand 1998 end-of-year disclosure amounts and 1998 pension
cost. The 1984 Unisex Pensioners Mortality Table (UP 84) was used
to the 1983 Group Annuity Mortality
Table which affects the comparability of benefit obligations.develop 1996 end-of-year disclosure and 1996 and 1997 pension
cost. The unrecognized net gain (loss) is amortized on a straight-linestraight-
line basis over the average remaining service period of employees
expected to receive a plan benefit.
Continental's policy is to fund the noncontributory defined benefit
pension plans in accordance with Internal Revenue Service ("IRS")
requirements as modified, to the extent applicable, by agreements
with the IRS.
The Company also has a profit sharing program under which an award
pool consisting of 15.0% of the Company's annual pre-tax earnings,
subject to certain adjustments, is distributed each year to
substantially all employees (other than employees whose collective
bargaining agreement provides otherwise or who otherwise receive
profit sharing payments as required by local law) on a pro rata
basis according to base salary. The profit sharing expense
included in the accompanying Consolidated Statements of Operations
for the years ended December 31, 1998, 1997 and 1996 and 1995 was $86
million, $105 million $68 million and $31$68 million, respectively.
NOTE 1011 - INCOME TAXES
The reconciliations of income tax computed at the United States
federal statutory tax rates to income tax provision for the years
ended December 31, 1998, 1997 1996 and 19951996 are as follows (in
millions):
Amount Percent
1998 1997 1996 19951998 1997 1996 1995
Income tax pro-
vision at
United States
statutory rates . . $227 $224 $150 $109 35.0 % 35.0 % 35.0 %
State income tax
provision . . . . . 10 9 6 51.5 1.4 1.4 1.6
Reorganization value
in excess of
amounts allocable
to identifiable
assets. . . . . . . - 4 5 20- 0.6 1.2 6.5
Meals and
entertainment
disallowance. . . . 10 9 7 61.5 1.4 1.6 1.9
Net operating loss
not previously
benefitted. . . . . - (15) (88) (67)- (2.3) (20.5) (21.6)
Other. . . . . . . . 1 6 6 50.3 1.0 1.4 1.6
Income tax
provision, net. . . $248 $237 $ 86 $ 7838.3 % 37.1 % 20.1 % 25.0 %
The significant component of the provision for income taxes for the
year ended December 31, 1998, 1997 1996 and 19951996 was a deferred tax
provision of $231 million, $220 million $80 million and $71$80 million,
respectively. The provision for income taxes for the period ended
December 31, 1998, 1997 1996 and 19951996 also reflects a current tax
provision in the amount of $17 million, $6$17 million and $7$6 million,
respectively, as the Company is in an alternative minimum tax
position for federal income tax purposes and pays current state
income tax.
Deferred income taxes reflect the net tax effects of temporary
differences between the carrying amounts of assets and liabilities
for financial reporting purposes and the related amounts used for
income tax purposes. Significant components of the Company's
deferred tax liabilities and assets as of December 31, 19971998 and
19961997 are as follows (in millions):
1998 1997 1996
Spare parts and supplies, fixed assets
and intangibles . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 639536 $ 635639
Deferred gain. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 57 63 62
Capital and safe harbor lease activity . . 46 49 34
Other, net . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 39 3439
Gross deferred tax liabilities . . . . . . 678 790 765
Accrued liabilities. . . . . . . . . . . . (370)(347) (370)
Revaluation of leases. . . . . . . . . . . (2) (16) (34)
Net operating loss carryforwards . . . . . (372) (631) (804)
Investment tax credit carryforwards. . . . (45) (45)
Minimum tax credit carryforward. . . . . . (37) (21) (10)
Gross deferred tax assets. . . . . . . . . (803) (1,083) (1,263)
Deferred tax assets valuation allowance. . 263 617 694
Net deferred tax liability . . . . . . . . 138 324 196
Less: current deferred tax (asset)
liability . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (234) (111) 121
Non-current deferred tax liability . . . . $ 435372 $ 75435
At December 31, 1997,1998, the Company hashad estimated net operating loss
carryforwards ("NOLs")NOLs of
$1.7$1.1 billion for federal income tax purposes that will expire
through 2009 and federal investment tax credit carryforwards of
$45 million that will expire through 2001. As a result of the
change in ownership of the Company on April 27, 1993, the ultimate
utilization of the Company's net operating losses and investment
tax credits could be limited. Reflecting this possible limitation,
the Company has recorded a valuation allowance of $617$263 million at
December 31, 1997.
In the fourth quarter1998.
Continental had, as of 1997, the Company determined that it would
be able to recognize an additional $155December 31, 1998, deferred tax assets
aggregating $803 million, including $372 million of NOLs attributable toand a
valuation allowance of $263 million. During the Company's pre-bankruptcy predecessor. Thisfirst quarter of
1998, the Company consummated several transactions, the benefit $62 million, was used to reduceof
which resulted in the elimination of reorganization value in excess
of amounts allocable to identifiable assets.assets of $164 million.
During the third and fourth quarters of 1998, the Company
determined that additional NOLs of the Company's predecessor could
be benefited and accordingly reduced both the valuation allowance
and routes, gates and slots by $190 million. To the extent the
Company were to determine in the future that additional NOLs of the
Company's pre-bankruptcy predecessor could be recognized in the accompanying
consolidated financial statements, such benefit would alsofurther
reduce reorganization value in excess of amounts allocable to
identifiable assets. If such reorganization value is exhausted,
such benefit would reduce other intangibles.
The deferred tax valuation allowance decreased from $694 million at
December 31, 1996 to $617 million at December 31, 1997. This
decrease is related to the realization of deferred tax assets
associated with net operating losses that had not previously been
benefitted.
Approximately $359 million of the Company's net operating losses
can only be used to offset the separate parent company taxable
income of Continental Airlines, Inc. Approximately $13 million of
the Company's investment tax credits can only be used to offset the
separate parent company tax liability of Continental Airlines, Inc.
NOTE 11 - NONOPERATING INCOME (EXPENSE)
In February 1996, Continental sold approximately 1.4 million of the
1.8 million shares it owned in America West, realizing net proceeds
of $25 millionroutes, gates and recognizing a gain of $13 million. In May 1996,
the Company sold all of its 802,860 America West warrants,
realizing net proceeds of $7 million and recognizing a gain of $5
million. The gains are included in Other, net in the accompanying
Consolidated Statements of Operations.
Continental and its former System One subsidiary entered into a
series of transactions on April 27, 1995 whereby a substantial
portion of System One's assets (including the travel agent
subscriber base and travel-related information management products
and services software), as well as certain liabilities of System
One, were transferred to a newly formed limited liability company,
System One Information Management, L.L.C. ("LLC"). LLC is owned
equally by Continental CRS Interests, Inc. ("Continental CRS")
(formerly System One, which remains a wholly owned subsidiary of
Continental), Electronic Data Systems Corporation ("EDS") and
AMADEUS, a European computerized reservation system ("CRS").
Substantially all of System One's remaining assets (including the
CRS software) and liabilities were transferred to AMADEUS. In
addition to the one-third interest in LLC, Continental CRS received
cash proceeds of $40 million and an equity interest in AMADEUS
valued at $120 million, and outstanding indebtedness of $42 million
of System One owed to EDS was extinguished. In connection with
these transactions, the Company recorded a pretax gain of $108
million, which amount was included in Nonoperating Income (Expense)
in the accompanying Consolidated Statements of Operations for the
year ended December 31, 1995. The related tax provision totaled
$78 million (which differs from the federal statutory rate due to
certain nondeductible expenses), for a net gain of $30 million.
System One's revenue, included in Cargo, mail and other revenue,
and related net earnings were not material to the consolidated
financial statements of Continental.
slots.
NOTE 12 - ACCRUALS FOR AIRCRAFT RETIREMENTS AND EXCESS FACILITIES
In August 1998, the Company announced that CMI plans to accelerate
the retirement of its four Boeing 747 aircraft by April 1999 and
its remaining thirteen Boeing 727 aircraft by December 2000. The
Boeing 747s will be replaced by DC-10-30 aircraft and the Boeing
727 aircraft will be replaced with a reduced number of Boeing 737
aircraft. In addition, Express will accelerate the retirement of
certain turboprop aircraft by December 2000, including its fleet of
32 EMB-120 turboprop aircraft, as regional jets are acquired to
replace turboprops.
In connection with its decision to accelerate the replacement of
these aircraft, the Company performed an evaluation to determine,
in accordance with SFAS 121, whether future cash flows
(undiscounted and without interest charges) expected to result from
the use and eventual disposition of these aircraft would be less
than the aggregate carrying amount of these aircraft and the
related assets. As a result of the evaluation, management
determined that the estimated future cash flows expected to be
generated by these aircraft would be less than their carrying
amount, and therefore these aircraft are impaired as defined by
SFAS 121. Consequently, the original cost basis of these aircraft
and related items was reduced to reflect the fair market value at
the date the decision was made, resulting in a $59 million fleet
disposition/impairment loss. In determining the fair market value
of these assets, the Company considered recent transactions
involving sales of similar aircraft and market trends in aircraft
dispositions. The remaining $63 million of the fleet
disposition/impairment loss includes cash and non-cash costs
related primarily to future commitments on leased aircraft past the
dates they will be removed from service and the write-down of
related inventory to its estimated fair market value. The combined
charge of $122 million was recorded in the third quarter of 1998.
During 1996, the Company made the decision to accelerate the
replacement of certain aircraft between August 1997 and December
1999. As a result of its decision to accelerate the replacement of
these aircraft, the Company recorded a fleet disposition charge of
$128 million. The fleet disposition charge related primarily to
(i) the writedown of Stage 2 aircraft inventory, which is not
expected to be consumed through operations, to its estimated fair
value; and (ii) a provision for costs associated with the return of
leased aircraft at the end of their respective lease terms. The
majority of the aircraft are being accounted for as operating
leases and therefore the Company will continue to recognize rent
and amortization expenses on these aircraft until they are removed
from service.
During 1994, the Company recorded a $447 million provision
associated with (i) the planned early retirement of certain
aircraft ($278 million) and (ii) closed or underutilized airport
and maintenance facilities and other assets ($169 million).
The following represents the activity within these accruals during
the three years ended December 31, 19971998 (in millions):
1998 1997 1996 1995
Total accruals at beginning of year. . $151 $205 $220 $443
Net cash payments:
Aircraft related. . . . . . . . . . . (25)(34) (27) (52) (59)
Underutilized facilities and other. . (30) (13) (17)
(20)
DecreaseIncrease/(decrease) in accrual for
grounded aircraft.aircraft . . . . . . . . . . . . . .- (16) - -
Fleet disposition charge for cost of
return of leased aircraft . . . . . . - 54
Fleet disposition/impairment loss
for the retirement of aircraft. . . . 63 - Issuance of the Convertible Secured
Debentures.-
Other. . . . . . . . . . . . . . - - (158)
Increase in accrual for underutilized
facilities. . . . . . . . . . . . . .5 2 - - 14
Total accruals at end of year. . . . . 155 151 205 220
Portion included in accrued other
liabilities . . . . . . . . . . . . . (60) (28) (17) (45)
Accrual for aircraft retirements and
excess facilities . . . . . . . . . . $ 95 $123 $188 $175
The remaining accruals relate primarily to anticipated cash outlays
associated with (i) underutilized airport facilities (primarily
associated with Denver International Airport), (ii) the return of
leased aircraft and (iii) the remaining liability associated with
the grounded aircraft. The Company has assumed certain sublease
rental income for these closed and underutilized facilities and
grounded aircraft in determining the accrual at December 31, 1997.each balance sheet
date. However, should actual sublease rental income be different
from the Company's estimates, the actual charge could be different
from the amount estimated. The remaining accrual represents cash
outlays to be incurred over the remaining lease terms (from one to
1312 years).
NOTE 13 - COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES
In March 1998, Continental announcedhas substantial commitments for capital expenditures,
including for the conversionacquisition of 15 Boeing
737 option aircraft to 15 Boeing 737-900 firm aircraft and the
addition of 25 optionnew aircraft. As of March 18, 1998,January 20,
1999, Continental had firm commitments with Boeingagreed to take delivery ofacquire a total of 154113 Boeing jet
aircraft (including the
Boeing 737-900 aircraft described above) during the years 1998
through 2005, withapproximately 57 of which are expected to be
delivered in 1999. Continental also has options for an additional
61114 aircraft (exercisable subject to certain conditions). These aircraft will
replace older, less efficient Stage 2 aircraft and allow for the
growth of operations. The
estimated aggregate cost of the Company's firm commitments for
the Boeing aircraft is approximately $6.7$5.5 billion. Continental
currently plans to finance its new Boeing aircraft with a
combination of enhanced pass through trust certificates, lease
equity and other third-party financing, subject to availability and
market conditions. As of March 18, 1998,January 20, 1999, Continental had
completed or
had third party commitments for a total of approximately $1.6
billion$354 million in financing arranged for itssuch future
Boeing deliveries, anddeliveries. In addition, Continental had commitments or
letters of intent from various sources for backstop financing for approximately one-thirdone-
third of the anticipated remaining acquisition cost of such Boeing
deliveries. The Company currently
plans on financingIn addition, at January 20, 1999, Continental has firm
commitments to purchase 32 spare engines related to the new Boeing
aircraft with a combination of
enhanced equipment trust certificates, lease equity and other third
party financing subject to availability and market conditions.for approximately $167 million, which will be deliverable
through December 2004. However, further financing will be needed
to satisfy the Company's capital commitments for other aircraft and
aircraft-related expenditures such as engines, spare parts,
simulators and related items. There can be no assurance that
sufficient financing will be available for all aircraft and other
capital expenditures not covered by firm financing commitments.
Deliveries of new Boeing aircraft are expected to increase aircraft
rental, depreciation and interest costs while generating cost
savings in the areas of maintenance, fuel and pilot training.
In September 1996,As of January 20, 1999, Express placed ahad firm ordercommitments for 38 Embraer
ERJ-145 ("ERJ-145") 50-seat regional jets and 25 Embraer ERJ-
145ERJ-135
("ERJ-135") 37-seat regional jets, with options for an additional
175125 ERJ-145 and 50 ERJ-135 aircraft exercisable through 2008.
In June 1997, Express exercised its
option to order 25anticipates taking delivery of such option aircraft19 ERJ-145 and expects to confirm
its order for an additional 25 of its remaining option aircraft by
August 1998.six ERJ-135
regional jets in 1999. Neither Express nor Continental will have
any obligation to take suchany ERJ-145 firm aircraft that are not
financed by a third party and leased to Continental.
Express took delivery of 18 of
the aircraft through December 31, 1997 and will take delivery of
the remaining 32 aircraft through the third quarter of 1999.
Continental expects to account for all of these aircraft as
operating leases.
Continental expects its cash outlays for 19981999 capital expenditures,
exclusive of fleet plan requirements, to aggregate $211$254 million
primarily relating to mainframe, software application and
automation infrastructure projects, aircraft modifications and
mandatory maintenance projects, passenger terminal facility
improvements and office, maintenance, telecommunications and ground
equipment.
Continental remains contingently liable until December 1, 2015, on
$202 million of long-term lease obligations of US Airways, Inc.
("US Airways") related to the East End Terminal at LaGuardia
Airport in New York. If US Airways defaulted on these obligations,
Continental could be required to cure the default, at which time it
would have the right to reoccupy the terminal.
In April 1997, collective bargaining agreement negotiations began
with the Independent Association of Continental Pilots ("IACP") to
amend both the Continental pilots' contract (which became amendable
in July 1997) and Express pilots' contract (which became amendable
in October 1997). In February 1998, a five-year collective
bargaining agreement with the Continental Airlines pilots was
announced by the Company and the IACP. In March 1998, Express also
announced a five-year collective bargaining agreement with its
pilots. These agreements are subject to approval by the IACP board
of directors and ratification by the Continental and Express
pilots. In September 1997, Continental announced that it intends
to bring all employees to industry standard wages (the average of
the top ten air carriers as ranked by the DOT excluding
Continental) within 36 months. The announcement further stated
that wage increases will be phased in over the 36-month period as
revenue, interest rates and rental rates reached industry
standards.
In FebruaryDuring 1998, Continental began a block space arrangementarrangements whereby Continentalit
is committed to purchase capacity on another
carrierother carriers at an aggregate
cost of approximately $150 million per year. These arrangements
are for 10 years. Pursuant to other block-space arrangements,
other carriers are committed to purchase capacity at a cost of
approximately $147$100 million per year. This
arrangementon Continental.
Approximately 40% of the Company's employees are covered by
collective bargaining agreements. The Company's collective
bargaining agreements with its Express flight attendants and
Continental Airlines flight attendants (representing approximately
17% of the Company's employees) become amendable in November and
December 1999. Negotiations are expected to begin in the third
quarter of 1999 to amend these contracts. The Company believes
that mutually acceptable agreements can be reached with such
employees, although the ultimate outcome of the Company's
negotiations is for 10 years.unknown at this time.
Legal Proceedings
United Statement of America v. Northwest Airlines Corp. &
Continental Airlines, Inc.: The Antitrust Division of the
Department of Justice is challenging under Section 7 of the Clayton
Act and Section 1 of the Sherman Act the acquisition by Northwest
of Shares of Continental's Class A common stock bearing, together
with certain shares for which Northwest has a limited proxy, more
than 50% of the fully diluted voting power of all Continental
stock. The government's position is that, notwithstanding various
agreements that severely restrict Northwest's ability to exercise
voting control over Continental and are designed to assure
Continental's competitive independence, Northwest's control of the
Class A common stock will reduce actual and potential competition
in various ways and in a variety of markets. Continental believes
that because of agreements restricting Northwest's right to
exercise control over Continental, the companies remain independent
competitors; Northwest's stock acquisition was made solely for
investment purposes and thus is expressly exempt under Section 7 of
the Clayton Act; and Northwest's stock acquisition was necessary in
order for Northwest and Continental to enter into an alliance
agreement that is highly pro-competitive. The government seeks an
order requiring Northwest to divest all voting stock in Continental
on terms and conditions as may be agreed to by the government and
the Court. No specific relief is sought against Continental.
The Company and/or certain of its subsidiaries are defendants in
various lawsuits, including suits relating to certain environmental
claims, the Company's consolidated Plan of Reorganization under
Chapter 11 of the federal bankruptcy code which became effective on
April 27, 1993, the Company's long-term global alliance agreement
with Northwest Airlines, Inc. ("Northwest") entered into in connection with Air Partners'
disposition of its interest in Continental to an affiliate of Northwest (see Note
16)14) and proceedings arising in the normal course of business.
While the outcome of these lawsuits and proceedings cannot be
predicted with certainty and could have a material adverse effect
on the Company's financial position, results of operations and cash
flows, it is the opinion of management, after consulting with
counsel, that the ultimate disposition of such suits will not have
a material adverse effect on the Company's financial position,
results of operations or cash flows.
NOTE 14 - RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS
The following is a summary of significant related party
transactions that occurred during 1998, 1997 1996 and 1995,1996, other than
those discussed elsewhere in the Notes to Consolidated Financial
Statements.
In connection with certain synergies agreements, Continental paid
Air Canada, a former significant stockholder of the Company, $30
million $16 million and $38$16 million for the years ended December 31, 1997 1996 and
1995,1996, respectively, and Air Canada paid Continental $16 million $17 million and
$16$17 million in 1997 1996 and 1995,1996, respectively, primarily relating to
aircraft maintenance.
The Company and America West Airlines, Inc. ("America West"), a
subsidiary of America West Holdings, in which David Bonderman holds
a significant interest, entered into a series of agreements during
1994 related to code-sharing and ground handling that have created
substantial benefits for both airlines. Mr. Bonderman is a
director of the Company and holds a significant interest in the
Company. The services provided are considered normal to the daily
operations of both airlines. As a result of these agreements,
Continental paid America West $15 million, $16 million and $15
million in 1998, 1997 and $11
million in 1997, 1996, and 1995, respectively, and America West paid
Continental $27 million, $23 million and $22 million in 1998, 1997
and $14 million in 1997, 1996, and 1995, respectively.
On July 27, 1995 and August 10, 1995, Air Partners purchased from
the Company an aggregate of 308,226 and 657,320 shares of Class B
common stock, respectively, at purchase prices of $7.93 per share
(with respect to a total of 710,660 shares) and $6.70 per share
(with respect to a total of 254,886 shares). Of the total, 316,640
shares were purchased pursuant to the exercise of antidilution
rights granted to Air Partners under the Certificate of
Incorporation and the remaining 648,906 shares were purchased
pursuant to the exercise of antidilution rights granted to Air
Canada under the Certificate of Incorporation (which rights were
purchased by Air Partners immediately prior to their exercise on
August 10, 1995).
In May 1996, Air Canada converted all of its 3,322,112 shares of
Class A common stock into Class B common stock (pursuant to certain
rights granted to it under the Company's Certificate of
Incorporation) and sold, on the open market, 4,400,000 shares of
the Company's common stock pursuant to the Secondary Offering.
On November 21, 1996, Air Partners, a significant stockholder of
the Company, exercised its right to sell to the Company, and the
Company subsequently purchased, for $50 million, Warrantswarrants to
purchase 2,614,379 shares of Class B common stock (representing a
portion of the total warrants held by Air Partners) pursuant to an
agreement entered into earlier in 1996 with the Company.
In April 1997, Continental redeemed for cash all of the 460,247
outstanding shares of its Series A 12% Preferred held by an
affiliate of Air Canada for $100 per share plus accrued dividends
thereon. The redemption price, including accrued dividends,
totaled $48 million.
On June 2, 1997, the Company purchased for $94 million from Air
Partners warrants to purchase 3,842,542 shares of Class B common
stock (representing a portion of the total warrants held by Air
Partners). The purchase price represented the intrinsic value of
the warrants (the difference between the closing market price of
the Class B common stock on May 28, 1997 ($34.25) and the
applicable exercise price).
In July 1997, the Company purchased the rights of United Micronesia
Development Association, Inc. ("UMDA") to receive future payments
under a services agreement between UMDA and CMI (pursuant to which
CMI was to pay UMDA approximately 1% of the gross revenues of CMI,
as defined, through January 1, 2012, which payment by CMI to UMDA
totaled $1 million, $6 million and $6 million in 1997, 1996 and
1995, respectively) and UMDA's 9% interest in AMI, terminated the
Company's obligations to UMDA under a settlement agreement entered
into in 1987, and terminated substantially all of the other
contractual arrangements between the Company, AMI and CMI, on the
one hand, and UMDA on the other hand, for an aggregate
consideration of $73 million.
In connection with the Company's $320 million secured term loan
financing, entered into in 1996, CMI paid UMDA a dividend of
approximately $13 million in 1996.
In November 1998, the Company and Northwest, a significant
stockholder of the Company, began implementing a long-term global
alliance involving extensive code-sharing, frequent flyer
reciprocity and other cooperative activities.
NOTE 15 - FOREIGN OPERATIONSSEGMENT REPORTING
Continental conducts operationsadopted Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No.
131 - "Disclosure About Segments of an Enterprise and Related
Information" ("SFAS 131") during the first quarter of 1998. SFAS
131 established standards for reporting information about operating
segments in various foreign countries.annual financial statements as well as related
disclosures about products and services, geographic areas and major
customers. Operating revenue from foreign operationssegments are defined as components of an
enterprise about which separate financial information is available
that is evaluated regularly by the chief operating decision maker,
or decision making group, in deciding how to allocate resources and
in assessing performance. Continental has one reportable operating
segment (air transportation).
Information concerning principal geographic areas is as follows (in
millions):
Year Ended December 31,1998 1997 1996
1995Operating Operating Operating
Revenue Revenue Revenue
Pacific $ 648 $ 699 $ 742Domestic (U.S.) $5,620 $5,215 $4,761
Atlantic 995 778 494
390
Latin America 532 372 311
$1,958 $1,565 $1,443769 572 406
Pacific 567 648 699
$7,951 $7,213 $6,360
NOTE 16 - SUBSEQUENT EVENTS
The Company announced on January 26, 1998 that Air Partners,attributes revenue among the holdergeographical areas based
upon the origin and destination of 5,263,188 shareseach flight segment. The
Company's tangible assets consist primarily of Continental's Class A common stockflight equipment
which is mobile across geographic markets and, warrants to purchase 3,039,468 shares of Class A common stock,
which represent, assuming exercise of the warrants, approximately
14% of the Company's common stock equity and approximately 51% of
its outstanding voting power, had entered into an agreement to
dispose of its interest in the Company to an affiliate of Northwest
(the "Air Partners Transaction"). The Air Partners Transaction is
subject to, among other matters, governmental approval and
expiration of applicable waiting periods under the Hart-Scott-
Rodino Antitrust Improvements Act of 1976. The agreement also
extends to an affiliate of Air Partners a right of first offer to
purchase certain shares of Class A common stock to be acquired by
Northwest or its affiliates if such entities intend to dispose of
those securities prior to the fifth anniversary of the closing of
the Air Partners Transaction. Upon completion of the Air Partners
Transaction, a change of control will result under the 97 and 94
Incentive Plans and all outstanding options and restricted stock
under these plans will become fully vested. The Company also
announced on January 26, 1998, that in connection with the Air
Partners Transaction, the Company had entered into a long-term
global alliance with Northwest.therefore, has not
been allocated.
NOTE 17
NOTE 16 - QUARTERLY FINANCIAL DATA (UNAUDITED)
Unaudited summarized financial data by quarter for 19971998 and 19961997 is as follows (in millions,
except per share data):
Three Months Ended
March 31 June 30 September 30 December 31
1998
Operating revenue . . . . . . . . . . . . . $1,854 $2,036 $2,116 $1,945
Operating income. . . . . . . . . . . . . . 150 280 143 128
Nonoperating income (expense), net. . . . . (13) (5) (18) (17)
Net income. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 81 163 73 66
Earnings per common share:
Income before extraordinary charge. . . . $ 1.38 $ 2.74 $ 1.21 $ 1.08
Extraordinary charge, net of tax. . . . . - (0.06) - -
Net income (a). . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 1.38 $ 2.68 $ 1.21 $ 1.08
Earnings per common share assuming
dilution:
Income before extraordinary charge. . . . $ 1.06 $ 2.11 $ 0.97 $ 0.91
Extraordinary charge, net of tax. . . . . - (0.05) - -
Net income (a). . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 1.06 $ 2.06 $ 0.97 $ 0.91
(continued on next page)
Three Months Ended
March 31 June 30 September 30 December 31
1997
Operating revenue . . . . . . . . . . . . . $1,698 $1,786 $1,890 $1,839
Operating income. . . . . . . . . . . . . . 146 231 207 132
Nonoperating income (expense), net. . . . . (22) (23) (21) (10)
Net income. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 74 128 110 73
Earnings per common share:
Income before extraordinary losscharge (a). . . $ 1.28 $ 2.22 $ 1.97 $ 1.26
Extraordinary loss,charge, net of tax. . . . . . - - (0.07) -
Net income (a). . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 1.28 $ 2.22 $ 1.90 $ 1.26
Earnings per common share assuming
dilution:
Income before extraordinary losscharge (a). . . $ 0.96 $ 1.63 $ 1.48 $ 0.97
Extraordinary loss,charge, net of tax. . . . . . - - (0.04) -
Net income (a). . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 0.96 $ 1.63 $ 1.44 $ 0.97
(continued on next page)
Three Months Ended
March 31 June 30 September 30 December 31
1996
Operating revenue . . . . . . . . . . . . . $1,489 $1,639 $1,671 $1,561
Operating income. . . . . . . . . . . . . . 120 229 77 99
Nonoperating income (expense), net. . . . . (25) (23) (30) (19)
Net income. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 88 167 17 47
Earnings per common share:
Income before extraordinary loss (a). . . $ 1.60 $ 3.05 $ 0.42 $ 0.82
Extraordinary loss, net of tax. . . . . . - - (0.12) -
Net income (a). . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 1.60 $ 3.05 $ 0.30 $ 0.82
Earnings per common share assuming
dilution:
Income before extraordinary loss (a). . . $ 1.19 $ 2.09 $ 0.34 $ 0.62
Extraordinary loss, net of tax. . . . . . - - (0.08) -
Net income (a). . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 1.19 $ 2.09 $ 0.26 $ 0.62
(a) The sum of the four quarterly earnings per share amounts does not agree with the
earnings per share as calculated for the full year due to the fact that the full year
calculation uses a weighted average number of shares based on the sum of the four
quarterly weighted average shares divided by four quarters.
During the second quarter of 1998, Continental recorded a $4
million after tax extraordinary charge relating to prepayment of
debt.
During the third quarter of 1998, Continental recorded a fleet
disposition/impairment loss of $122 million ($77 million after tax)
relating to its decision to accelerate the retirement of certain
jet and turboprop aircraft.
During the third quarter of 1997, in connection with the prepayment
of certain indebtedness, Continental recorded a $4 million after
tax extraordinary loss relating to early extinguishment of debt.
During the first quarter of 1996, the Company recorded a pretax
gain of $12.5 million related to the sale of approximately 1.4
million shares of America West common stock.
During the second quarter of 1996, the Company recorded a $5
million gain related to the sale of the America West warrants.
During the third quarter of 1996, the Company recorded a fleet
disposition charge of $128 million ($77 million after-tax) related
to the Company's decision to accelerate the replacement of certain
aircraft. In addition, in connection with the prepayment
of certain indebtedness, Continental recorded a $6$4 million after
tax extraordinary losscharge relating to early extinguishment of debt.
ITEM 9. CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS ON ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL
DISCLOSURE.
There were no changes in or disagreements on any matters of
accounting principles or financial statement disclosure between the
Company and its independent public auditors during the registrant's
two most recent fiscal years or any subsequent interim period.
PART III
ITEM 10. DIRECTORS AND EXECUTIVE OFFICERS OF THE REGISTRANT.
Incorporated herein by reference from the Company's definitive
proxy statement for the annual meeting of stockholders to be held
on May 21, 1998.18, 1999.
ITEM 11. EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION.
Incorporated herein by reference from the Company's definitive
proxy statement for the annual meeting of stockholders to be held
on May 21, 1998.18, 1999.
ITEM 12. SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND
MANAGEMENT.
Incorporated herein by reference from the Company's definitive
proxy statement for the annual meeting of stockholders to be held
on May 21, 1998.18, 1999.
ITEM 13. CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS.
Incorporated herein by reference from the Company's definitive
proxy statement for the annual meeting of stockholders to be held
on May 21, 1998.18, 1999.
PART IV
ITEM 14. EXHIBITS, FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES AND REPORTS ON
FORM 8-K.
(a) The following financial statements are included in Item 8.
"Financial Statements and Supplementary Data":
Report of Independent Auditors
Consolidated Statements of Operations for each of the Three
Years in the Period Ended December 31, 19971998
Consolidated Balance Sheets as of December 31, 19971998 and 19961997
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for each of the Three
Years in the Period Ended December 31, 19971998
Consolidated Statements of Redeemable Preferred Stock and
Common Stockholders' Equity for each of the Three Years
in the Period Ended December 31, 19971998
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(b) Financial Statement Schedules:
Report of Independent Auditors
Schedule II - Valuation and Qualifying Accounts
All other schedules have been omitted because they are
inapplicable, not required, or the information is included
elsewhere in the consolidated financial statements or notes
thereto.
(c) Reports on Form 8-K.8-K:
(i) Report on Form 8-K dated September 25, 1997,November 3, 1998 with respect to Item 7.
Financial Statements and Exhibits, related to the
offering of Continental Airlines, Inc.'s Pass Through
Certificates Series 1997-3.1998-3.
(ii) Report on Form 8-K dated October 6, 1997,November 20, 1998 with respect to Item 7. Financial Statements and Exhibits5.
Other Events, related to the Form of Pass Through Trust Agreement and
Statement of Eligibility of Wilmington Trust Company on
Form T-1.Northwest Transaction.
(iii) Report on Form 8-K dated October 23, 1997,December 8, 1998 with respect to Item 7.
Financial Statements and Exhibits, related to the
offering of Continental Airlines, Inc.'s Pass
Through Certificates, Series 1997-4.8% Notes due
December 15, 2005.
(d) See accompanying Index to Exhibits.
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS
We have audited the consolidated financial statements of
Continental Airlines, Inc. as of December 31, 19971998 and 1996,1997, and
for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 1997,1998,
and have issued our report thereon dated February 9, 1998, except
for Note 13, as to which the date is March 18, 1998January 20, 1999 (included
elsewhere in this Form 10-K). Our audits also included the
financial statement schedule for these related periods listed in
Item 14(b) of this Form 10-K. This schedule is the responsibility
of the Company's management. Our responsibility is to express an
opinion based on our audits.
In our opinion, the financial statement schedule referred to above,
when considered in relation to the basic financial statements taken
as a whole, presents fairly in all material respects the
information set forth therein.
ERNST & YOUNG LLP
Houston, Texas
March 18, 1998January 20, 1999
CONTINENTAL AIRLINES, INC.
SCHEDULE II - VALUATION AND QUALIFYING ACCOUNTS
For the Years Ended December 31, 1998, 1997, and 1996 and 1995
(In millions)
Allowance
for Doubtful Allowance for
Receivables Obsolescence
Balance, December 31, 1994 . . . $38 $36
Additions charged to expense . 24 12
Deductions from reserve. . . . (15) (12)
Other. . . . . . . . . . . . . (3) -
Balance, December 31, 1995 . . . $ 44 $ 36
Additions charged to expense . 16 18
Deductions from reserve. . . . (31) (8)
Other. . . . . . . . . . . . . (2) 1
Balance, December 31, 1996 . . . 27 47
Additions charged to expense . 12 12
Deductions from reserve. . . . (21) (4)
Other. . . . . . . . . . . . . 5 (4)
Balance, December 31, 1997 . . . $23 $5123 51
Additions charged to expense . 18 17
Deductions from reserve. . . . (18) (16)
Other. . . . . . . . . . . . . (1) (6)
Balance, December 31, 1998 . . . $ 22 $ 46
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused
this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned,
thereunto duly authorized.
CONTINENTAL AIRLINES, INC.
By /s/ LAWRENCE W. KELLNER
Lawrence W. Kellner
Executive Vice President and
Chief Financial Officer
(On behalf of Registrant)
Date: March 19, 1998February 25, 1999
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934, this report has been signed by the following persons in the
capacities indicated on March 19, 1998.February 25, 1999.
Signature Capacity
/s/ GORDON M. BETHUNE Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
Gordon M. Bethune (Principal Executive Officer)
/s/ LAWRENCE W. KELLNER Executive Vice President and
Lawrence W. Kellner Chief Financial Officer
(Principal Financial Officer)
/s/ MICHAEL P. BONDS Vice President and Controller
Michael P. Bonds (Principal Accounting Officer)
THOMAS J. BARRACK, JR.* Director
Thomas J. Barrack, Jr.
LLOYD M. BENTSEN, JR.* Director
Lloyd M. Bentsen, Jr.
DAVID BONDERMAN* Director
David Bonderman
/s/GREGORY D. BRENNEMAN Director
Gregory D. Brenneman
PATRICK FOLEY* Director
Patrick Foley
DOUGLAS McCORKINDALE* Director
Douglas McCorkindale
GEORGE G.C.G. C. PARKER* Director
George G.C.G. C. Parker
RICHARD W. POGUE* Director
Richard W. Pogue
WILLIAM S. PRICE III* Director
William Price III
DONALD L. STURM* Director
Donald L. Sturm
KAREN HASTIE WILLIAMS* Director
Karen Hastie Williams
CHARLES A. YAMARONE* Director
Charles A. Yamarone
*By /s/ LAWRENCE W. KELLNER
Lawrence W. Kellner
Attorney-in-Fact
March 19, 1998Attorney in-fact
February 25, 1999
INDEX TO EXHIBITS
OF
CONTINENTAL AIRLINES, INC.
2.1 Revised Third Amended Disclosure Statement Pursuant to
Section 1125 of the Bankruptcy Code with Respect to
Debtors' Revised Second Amended Joint Plan of
Reorganization Under Chapter 11 of the United States
Bankruptcy Code, as filed with the Bankruptcy Court on
January 13, 1993 -- incorporated by reference from
Exhibit 2.1 to Continental's Annual Report on Form 10-K
for the year ended December 31, 1992 (File no. 0-9781).
2.2 Modification of Debtors' Revised Second Amended Joint
Plan of Reorganization dated March 12, 1993 --
incorporated by reference to Exhibit 2.2 to Continental's
Current Report on Form 8-K, dated April 16, 1993 (File
no. 0-9781) (the "April"4/93 8-K").
2.3 Second Modification of Debtors' Revised Second Amended
Joint Plan of Reorganization, dated April 8, 1993 --
incorporated by reference to Exhibit 2.3 to the April 8-
K.4/93 8-K.
2.4 Third Modification of Debtors' Revised Second Amended
Joint Plan of Reorganization, dated April 15, 1993 --
incorporated by reference to Exhibit 2.4 to the April 8-
K.4/93 8-K.
2.5 Confirmation Order, dated April 16, 1993 -- incorporated
by reference to Exhibit 2.5 to the April4/93 8-K.
3.1 Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation of
Continental -- incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 4.1(a) to Continental's Form S-8 registration
statement (No. 333-06993) (the "1996 S-8").
3.2 By-laws of Continental, as amended to date --
incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.199.3 to
Continental's QuarterlyCurrent Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended
September 30, 19968-K dated November
20, 1998 (the "1996 Third Quarter 10-Q""11/98 8-K").
4.1 Specimen Class A Common Stock Certificate of the Company
-- incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to
Continental's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year
ended December 31, 1995 (File no. 0-9781) (the "1995 10-
K").
4.2 Specimen Class B Common Stock Certificate of the Company
-- incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to
Continental's Form S-1 Registration Statement (No. 33-
68870) (the "1993 S-1").
4.3 SubscriptionRights Agreement, dated as of November 20, 1998, between
Continental and Stockholders' AgreementHarris Trust and Savings Bank --
incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.54.1 to the April 8-K.
4.3(a) Amendment11/98 8-
K.
4.4 Certificate of Designation of Series A Junior
Participating Preferred Stock, included as Exhibit A to
Stockholders' Agreement dated April 19, 1996
among the Company, Air Partners and Air CanadaExhibit 4.3 -- incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.14.2
to the 11/98 8-K.
4.5 Form of Right Certificate, included as Exhibit B to
Exhibit 4.3 -- incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.3
to the 11/98 8-K.
4.6 Summary of Rights to Purchase Preferred Shares, included
as Exhibit C to Exhibit 4.3 -- incorporated by reference
to Exhibit 4.4 to the 11/98 8-K.
4.7 Governance Agreement dated January 25, 1998 among the
Company, Newbridge Parent Corporation ("Newbridge") and
Northwest Airlines Corporation ("Northwest") --
incorporated by reference to Exhibit 99.1 to
Continental's Current Report on Form S-3 Registration Statement (No. 333-
02701) (the "1996 S-3")8-K dated January
25, 1998 (File no. 0-9781).
4.44.7(a) First Amendment to the Governance Agreement dated March
2, 1998. (3)
4.7(b) Second Amendment to the Governance Agreement dated
November 20, 1998 -- incorporated by reference to Exhibit
99.6 to the 11/98 8-K.
4.8 Supplemental Agreement dated November 20, 1998 among the
Company, Newbridge and Northwest -- incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 99.7 to the 11/98 8-K.
4.9 Amended and Restated Registration Rights Agreement dated
April 19, 1996 among the Company, Air Partners, L.P. and
Air Canada -- incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2
to Continental's Form S-3 Registration Statement (No.
333-02701).
4.9(a) Amendment dated November 20, 1998 to the 1996 S-3.
4.5Amended and
Restated Registration Rights Agreement among the Company,
Air Partners and Northwest -- incorporated by reference
to Exhibit 99.5 to the November 8-K.
4.10 Warrant Agreement dated as of April 27, 1993, between
Continental and Continental as warrant agent --
incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.7 to the April 8-
K.
4.64/93 8-K.
4.11 Continental hereby agrees to furnish to the Commission,
upon request, copies of certain instruments defining the
rights of holders of long-term debt of the kind described
in Item 601(b)(4)(iii)(A) of Regulation S-K.
9.1 Northwest Airlines/Air Partners Voting Trust Agreement
dated as of November 20, 1998 among the Company,
Northwest, Northwest Airlines Holdings Corporation, Air
Partners and Wilmington Trust Company, as Trustee --
incorporated by reference to Exhibit 99.4 to the 11/98 8-
K.
10.1 Agreement of Lease dated as of January 11, 1985, between
the Port Authority of New York and New Jersey and People
Express Airlines, Inc., regarding Terminal C (the
"Terminal C Lease") -- incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 10.61 to the Annual Report on Form 10-K (File No.
0-9781) of People Express Airlines, Inc. for the year
ended December 31, 1984.
10.1(a) Supplemental Agreements Nos. 1 through 6 to the Terminal
C Lease -- incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3 to
Continental's Annual Report on Form 10-K (File No. 1-
8475) for the year ended December 31, 1987 ("the 1987(the "1987 10-
K").
10.1(b) Supplemental Agreement No. 7 to the Terminal C Lease --
incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.4 to
Continental's Annual Report on Form 10-K (File No. 1-
8475) for the year ended December 31, 1988.
10.1(c) Supplemental Agreements No. 8 through 11 to the Terminal
C Lease -- incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.10 to
the 1993 S-1.
10.1(d) Supplemental Agreements No. 12 through 15 to the Terminal
C Lease -- incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2(d)
to the 1995 10-K.
10.1(e) Supplemental Agreement No. 16 to the Terminal C Lease.
(3)
Lease --
incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1(e) to
Continental's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year
ended December 31, 1997 (File no. 0-9781) (the "1997 10-
K").
10.2 Assignment of Lease with Assumption and Consent dated as
of August 15, 1987, among the Port Authority of New York
and New Jersey, People Express Airlines, Inc. and
Continental -- incorporated by reference to Exhibit
10.2 to the 1987 10-K.
10.3* Amended and restated employment agreement between the
Company and Gordon M. Bethune, dated as of November 20,
1998. (3)
10.4* Amended and restated employment agreement between the
Company and Gregory Brenneman, dated as of November 20,
1998. (3)
10.5* Amended and restated employment agreement dated as of
November 15, 1995 between the Company and Lawrence
Kellner -- incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.4 to the 1995 10-K.
10.3(a)* Amendment to employment agreement, dated as of April 19,
1996, between the Company and Gordon M. Bethune --
incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.110.3 to
Continental's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the
quarter ended June 30, 199630,1996 (File no. 0-9781) (the "1996
Second Quarter 10-
Q"Q2 10-Q").
10.3(b)10.5(a)* Amendment dated as of November 20, 1998 to Mr. Kellner's
employment agreement. (3)
10.6* Amended and restated employment agreement dated as of
September
30, 1996, between the Company and Gordon M. Bethune --
incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the 1996
Third Quarter 10-Q.
10.4* Amended and restated employment agreement between the
Company and Gregory D. Brenneman -- incorporated by ref-
erence to Exhibit 10.5 to theNovember 15, 1995 10-K.
10.4(a)* Amendment to employment agreement, dated as of April 19,
1996, between the Company and Gregory D. Brenneman --
incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to the 1996
Second Quarter 10-Q.
10.4(b)* Amendment to employment agreement, dated as of September
30, 1996, between the Company and Gregory D. Brenneman --
incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to the 1996
Third Quarter 10-Q.
10.5* Amended and restated employment agreement between the
Company and Lawrence W. Kellner -- incorporated by ref-
erence to Exhibit 10.3 to the 1996 Second Quarter 10-Q.
10.6* Amended and restated employment agreement between the Company and C.D. McLean --
incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.8 to the 1995 10-K.10-
K.
10.6(a)* Amendment dated as of November 20, 1998 to Mr. McLean's
employment agreement. (3)
10.7* Form of amendment to employment agreements, dated as of
April 19, 1996, between the Company and, respectively,
Lawrence W. Kellner and C.D. McLean -- incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 10.4 to the 1996 Second Quarter 10-
Q.
10.7(a)*Q2 10-Q.
10.8* Form of amendment to employment agreements, dated as of
September 30, 1996, between the Company and,
respectively, Lawrence W. Kellner and C.D. McLean --
incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3 to
Continental's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the
quarter ended September 30, 1996 Third Quarter 10-Q.
10.8*(File no. 0-9781) (the
"1996 Q3 10-Q").
10.9* Amended and restated employment agreement, as amended,
between the Company and Jeffery A. Smisek -- incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 10.2 to the ContinentalContinental's Quarterly
Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 1997
(File no. 0-9781) (the "1997 First QuarterQ1 10-Q").
10.9*10.9(a)* Amendment dated as of November 20, 1998 to Mr. Smisek's
employment agreement. (3)
10.10* Stay Bonus Agreement between the Company and Gordon
Bethune -- incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3 to
Continental's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the
quarter ended June 30, 1998 (File no. 0-9781) (the "1998
Q2 10-Q").
10.11* Stay Bonus Agreement between the Company and Gregory
Brenneman -- incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.4 to
the 1998 Q2 10-Q.
10.12* Stay Bonus Agreement between the Company and Lawrence
Kellner -- incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.5 to
the 1998 Q2 10-Q.
10.13* Stay Bonus Agreement between the Company and C.D. McLean
-- incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.6 to the 1998
Q2 10-Q.
10.14* Stay Bonus Agreement between the Company and Jeffery
Smisek -- incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.7 to
the 1998 Q2 10-Q.
10.15* Forms of Stay Bonus Agreements for other executive
officers -- incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.8 to
the 1998 Q2 10-Q.
10.16* Executive Bonus Program -- incorporated by reference to
Appendix B to the Company's proxy statement relating its
annual meeting of stockholders held on June 26, 1996.
10.10*10.17* Continental Airlines, Inc. 1994 Incentive Equity Plan
("1994 Equity Plan") -- incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 4.3 to the Company's Form S-8 Registration
Statement (No. 33-81324).
10.10(a)10.17(a)* First Amendment to 1994 Equity Plan -- incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 10.1 to Continental's Quarterly
Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30,
1995.
10.10(b)1995 (File no. 0-9781).
10.17(b)* Second Amendment to 1994 Equity Plan -- incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 4.3(c) to the 1996 S-8.
10.10(c)10.17(c)* Third Amendment to 1994 Equity Plan -- incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 10.4 to the 1996 Third QuarterQ3 10-Q.
10.10(d)10.17(d)* Fourth Amendment to 1994 Equity Plan. (3)
10.10(e)Plan -- incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 10.10(d) to the 1997 10-K.
10.17(e)* Form of Employee Stock Option Grant pursuant to the 1994
Equity Plan. (3)
10.10(f)Plan -- incorporated by reference to Exhibit
10.10(e) to the 1997 10-K.
10.17(f)* Form of Outside Director Stock Option Grant pursuant to
the 1994 Equity Plan. (3)
10.10(g)Plan -- incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 10.10(f) to the 1997 10-K.
10.17(g)* Form of Restricted Stock Grant pursuant to the 1994
Equity Plan. (3)
10.11*Plan -- incorporated by reference to Exhibit
10.10(g) to the 1997 10-K.
10.18* Continental Airlines, Inc. 1997 Stock Incentive Plan
("1997 Incentive Plan") -- incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 4.3 to Continental's Form S-8 Registration
Statement (No. 333-23165).
10.11(a)10.18(a)* First Amendment to 1997 Incentive Plan. (3)
10.11(b)Plan -- incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 10.11(a) to the 1997 10-K.
10.18(b)*Form of Employee Stock Option Grant pursuant to the 1997
Incentive Plan. (3)
10.11(c)Plan -- incorporated by reference to Exhibit
10.11(b) to the 1997 10-K.
10.18(c)*Form of Outside Director Stock Option Grant pursuant to
the 1997 Incentive Plan -- incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 10.11(c) to the 1997 10-K.
10.19* Amendment and Restatement of the 1994 Equity Plan and the
1997 Incentive Plan. (3)
10.12*10.20* Continental Airlines, Inc. 1998 Stock Incentive Plan
("1998 Incentive Plan") -- incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 4.3 to Continental's Form S-8 Registration
Statement (No. 333-57297) (the "1998 S-8").
10.20(a)* Form of Employee Stock Option Grant pursuant to the 1998
Incentive Plan -- incorporated by reference to Exhibit
4.4 to the 1998 S-8.
10.21* Continental Airlines, Inc. Deferred Compensation Plan --
incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.3 to Continental's
Form S-8 Registration Statement (No. 333-68233).
10.22* Form of Letter Agreement relating to certain flight
benefits between the Company and each of its nonemployee
directors -- incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.19
ofto the 1995 10-K.
10.1310.23 Purchase Agreement No. 1783, including exhibits and side
letters, thereto, between the Company and Boeing, effective
April 27, 1993, relating to the purchase of Boeing 757
aircraft ("Purchase Agreement No.P.A. 1783") -- incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 10.2 to Continental's Quarterly Report on Form
10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 1993.1993 (File no. 0-
9781). (1)
10.13(a)10.23(a) Supplemental Agreement No. 4 to Purchase Agreement No.P.A. 1783, dated March
31, 1995 -- incorporated by reference to Exhibit
10.12(a) to Continental's Annual Report on Form 10-K for
the year ended December 31, 1994 (File no. 0-9781). (1)
10.13(b)10.23(b) Supplemental Agreement No. 6 to Purchase Agreement No.P.A. 1783, dated June 13,
1996 -- incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.6 to the
1996 Second QuarterQ2 10-Q. (1)
10.13(c)10.23(c) Supplemental Agreement No. 7 to Purchase Agreement No.P.A. 1783, dated July 23,
1996 -- incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.6(a) to
the 1996 Second QuarterQ2 10-Q. (1)
10.13(d)10.23(d) Supplemental Agreement No. 8 to Purchase Agreement No.P.A. 1783, dated October
27, 1996 -- incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.11(d)
to Continental's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year
ended December 31, 1996 (File no. 0-9781) (the "1996 10-K"10-
K"). (1)
10.13(e)10.23(e) Letter Agreement No. 6-1162-GOC-044 to Purchase Agreement
No.P.A. 1783, dated
March 21, 1997 -- incorporated by reference to Exhibit
10.4 to the 1997 First QuarterQ1 10-Q. (2)
10.13(f)(1)
10.23(f) Supplemental Agreement No. 9 to Purchase Agreement No.P.A. 1783, dated August
13, 1997 -- incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to
Continental's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the
quarter ended September 30, 1997. (2)
10.13(g)1997 (File no. 0-9781). (1)
10.23(g) Supplemental Agreement No. 10, including side letters, to
Purchase Agreement No.P.A. 1783, dated October 10, 1997.1997 -- incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 10.13(g) to the 1997 10-K. (1)
10.23(h) Supplemental Agreement No. 11, including exhibits and
side letters, to P.A. 1783, dated July 30, 1998 --
incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to
Continental's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the
quarter ended September 30, 1998 (File no. 0-9781) (the
"1998 Q3 10-Q"). (1)
10.23(i) Supplemental Agreement No. 12, including side letter, to
P.A. 1783, dated September 29, 1998. (2)(3)
10.1410.23(j) Supplemental Agreement No. 13 to P.A. 1783, dated
November 16, 1998. (2)(3)
10.23(k) Supplemental Agreement No. 14, including side letter, to
P.A. 1783, dated December 17, 1998. (2)(3)
10.24 Purchase Agreement No. 1951, including exhibits and side
letters thereto, between the Company and Boeing, dated
July 23, 1996, relating to the purchase of Boeing 737
aircraft ("Purchase Agreement No.P.A. 1951") -- incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 10.8 to the 1996 Second QuarterQ2 10-Q. (1)
10.14(a)10.24(a) Supplemental Agreement No. 1 to Purchase Agreement No.P.A. 1951, dated October
10, 1996 -- incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.14(a)
to the 1996 10-K. (1)
10.14(b)10.24(b) Supplemental Agreement No. 2 to Purchase Agreement No.P.A. 1951, dated March 5,
1997 -- incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3 to the
1997 First QuarterQ1 10-Q. (2)
10.14(c)(1)
10.24(c) Supplemental Agreement No. 3, including exhibit and side
letter, to Purchase Agreement No.P.A. 1951, dated July 17, 1997. (2)(3)
10.14(d)1997 -- incorporated
by reference to Exhibit 10.14(c) to the 1997 10-K. (1)
10.24(d) Supplemental Agreement No. 4, including exhibits and side
letters, to Purchase Agreement No.P.A. 1951, dated October 10, 1997.1997 --
incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.14(d) to the 1997
10-K. (1)
10.24(e) Supplemental Agreement No. 5, including exhibits and side
letters, to P.A. 1951 dated October 10, 1997 --
incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the 1998 Q2
10-Q. (1)
10.24(f) Supplemental Agreememt No. 6, including exhibits and side
letters, to P.A. 1951, dated July 30, 1998 -- incor-
porated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the 1998 Q3 10-Q.
(1)
10.24(g) Supplemental Agreement No. 7, including side letters, to
P.A. 1951, dated November 12, 1998. (2)(3)
10.1510.24(h) Supplemental Agreement No. 8, including side letters, to
P.A. 1951, dated December 7, 1998. (2)(3)
10.24(i) Letter Agreement No. 6-1162-GOC-131R1 to P.A. 1951, dated
March 26, 1998 -- incorporated by reference to Exhibit
10.1 to Continental's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for
the quarter ended March 31, 1998 (File no. 0-9781). (1)
10.25 Aircraft General Terms Agreement between the Company and
Boeing, dated October 10, 1997. (2)(3)
10.15(a)1997 -- incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 10.15 to the 1997 10-K. (1)
10.25(a) Letter Agreement No. 6-1162-GOC-136 between the Company
and Boeing, dated October 10, 1997, relating to certain
long-term aircraft purchase commitments of the Company.
(2)(3)
10.16Company --
incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.15(a) to the 1997
10-K. (1)
10.26 Purchase Agreement No. 2060, including exhibits and side
letters, between the Company and Boeing, dated October
10, 1997, relating to the purchase of Boeing 767 aircraft
("Purchase Agreement No.P.A. 2060"). (2)(3)
10.16(a) Supplement -- incorporated by reference to Exhibit
10.16 to the 1997 10-K. (1)
10.26(a) Supplemental Agreement No. 1 to Purchase Agreement No.
2060. (2)(3)
10.17P.A. 2060 dated December
18, 1997 -- incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.16(a)
to the 1997 10-K. (1)
10.27 Purchase Agreement No. 2061, including exhibits and side
letters, between the Company and Boeing, dated October
10, 1997, relating to the purchase of Boeing 777 aircraft
("Purchase Agreement No.P.A. 2061"). (2)(3)
10.17(a) -- incorporated by reference to Exhibit
10.17 to the 1997 10-K. (1)
10.27(a) Supplemental Agreement No. 1 to P.A. 2061 dated December
18, 1997 -- incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.17(a)
as to the 1997 10-K. (1)
10.27(b) Supplemental Agreement No. 2, including side letter, to
P.A. 2061, dated July 30, 1998. (2) (3)
10.27(c) Supplemental Agreement No. 3, including side letter, to
P.A. 2061, dated September 25, 1998. (2)(3)
10.28 Purchase Agreement No. 2061.2211, including exhibits and side
letters thereto, between the Company and Boeing, dated
November 16, 1998, relating to the purchase of Boeing 767
aircraft. (2)(3)
10.1810.29 Lease Agreement dated as of May 1992 between the City and
County of Denver, Colorado and Continental regarding
Denver International Airport -- incorporated by reference
to Exhibit 10.17 to the 1993 S-1.
10.18(a)10.29(a) Supplemental Lease Agreement, including an exhibit
thereto, dated as of April 3, 1995 between the City and
County of Denver, Colorado and Continental and United Air
Lines, Inc. regarding Denver International Airport --
incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.15(a) to
Continental's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year
ended December 31, 1994 (File No. 0-9781).
10.1910.30 Airport Use and Lease Agreement dated as amended and supplemented,of January 1,
1998 between the Company and the City of Houston, Texas
regarding Terminal
CBush Intercontinental. (3)
10.30(a) Special Facilities Lease Agreement dated as of GeorgeMarch 1,
1997 by and between the Company and the City of Houston,
Texas regarding an automated people mover project at Bush
Intercontinental Airport -- incorporatedIntercontinental. (3)
10.30(b) Amended and Restated Special Facilities Lease Agreement
dated as of December 1, 1998 by reference to Exhibit 10.5 to Continental's Quarterly
Report on Form 10-Q forand between the quarter ended September 30,
1993 (the "1993 Third Quarter 10-Q").
10.20Company
and the City of Houston, Texas regarding certain terminal
improvement projects at Bush Intercontinental. (3)
10.30(c) Amended and Restated Special Facilities Lease Agreement
dated December 1, 1998 by and between the Company and the
City of Houston, Texas regarding certain airport
improvement projects at Bush Intercontinental. (3)
10.31 Agreement and Lease dated as of May 1987, as
supplemented, between the City of Cleveland, Ohio and
Continental regarding Cleveland Hopkins International
Airport --
incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.6 to
Continental's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the
quarter ended September 30, 1993 Third Quarter 10-Q.
10.21(File no. 0-9781).
10.31(a) Special Facilities Lease Agreement dated as of October
24, 1997 by and between the Company and the City of
Cleveland, Ohio regarding certain concourse expansion
projects at Hopkins International. (3)
10.32 Third Revised Investment Agreement, dated April 21, 1994,
between America West Airlines, Inc. and AmWest Partners,
L.P. -- incorporated by reference to Exhibit 1 to
Continental's Schedule 13D relating to America West
Airlines, Inc. filed on August 25, 1994.
10.22 Governance Agreement, dated January 25, 1998, among
Continental, Newbridge Parent Corporation and Northwest
Airlines Corporation (the "Governance Agreement") --
incorporated by reference to Exhibit 99.1 to
Continental's Current Report on Form 8-K, dated January
25, 1998.
10.22(a) First Amendment to the Governance Agreement, dated March
2, 1998. (3)
10.2310.33 Letter Agreement No. 11 between the Company and General
Electric Company, dated December 22, 1997, relating to
certain long-term engine purchase commitments of the
Company. (2)(3)Company -- incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.23 to
the 1997 10-K. (1)
21.1 List of Subsidiaries of Continental. (3)
23.1 Consent of Ernst & Young LLP. (3)
24.1 Powers of attorney executed by certain directors and
officers of Continental. (3)
27.1 Financial Data Schedule. (3)
99.1 Deferred Compensation Plan Trust Agreement, effective as
of January 1, 1999, between Continental Airlines, Inc.
and Chase Bank of Texas, N.A. (3)
__________
*These* These exhibits relate to management contracts or compensatory
plans or arrangements.
(1) The Commission has granted confidential treatment for a
portion of this exhibit.
(2) The Company has applied to the Commission for confidential
treatment of a portion of this exhibit.
(3) Filed herewith.