UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-K
ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the fiscal year ended December 31, 20162017
OR
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the transition period from                             to                             
Commission file number: 001-08052
TORCHMARK CORPORATION
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
Delaware 63-0780404
(State or other jurisdiction of
incorporation or organization)
 
(I.R.S. Employer
Identification No.)
  
3700 South Stonebridge Drive, McKinney, TX 75070
(Address of principal executive offices) (Zip Code)
972-569-4000
(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)
None
(Former name, former address and former fiscal year, if changed since last report)
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:
Title of each class CUSIP 
Name of each exchange on
which registered
Common Stock, $1.00 par value per share 891027104 New York Stock Exchange
Common Stock, $1.00 par value per share891027104The International Stock Exchange, London, England

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act:     None
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act.     
Yes  x      No   ¨    
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Exchange Act.
Yes ¨      No x   
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.     
Yes  x      No ¨   
Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K. ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).
Yes  x     No  ¨
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” andfiler,” “smaller reporting company”, and "emerging growth company" in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):
Large accelerated filer ý  Accelerated filer ¨
Non-accelerated filer 
¨ (Do not check if a smaller reporting company)
  Smaller reporting company¨
Emerging growth company¨
If an emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with any new or revised financial accounting standards provided pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act. ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).
Yes  ¨    No  x
As of June 30, 2016,2017, the aggregate market value of the registrant’s common stock held by non-affiliates of the registrant was $7,409,307,020$8,893,792,769 based on the closing sale price as reported on the New York Stock Exchange.
Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuer’s classes of common stock, as of the latest practicable date.
Class  Outstanding at February 17, 201716, 2018
Common Stock, $1.00 par value per share  117,761,153114,081,876 shares
DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE
Document  Parts Into Which Incorporated
Proxy Statement for the Annual Meeting of Stockholders to be
held April 27, 201726, 2018 (Proxy Statement)
  Part III

TORCHMARK CORPORATION
INDEXTable of Contents
 
    Page
    
   
    
 Item 1.
    
 Item 1A.
    
 Item 1B.
    
 Item 2.
    
 Item 3.
    
 Item 4.
    
   
    
 Item 5.
    
 Item 6.
    
 Item 7.
    
 Item 7A.
    
 Item 8.
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
 Item 9.
    
 Item 9A.
Item 9B.
    

Item 9B.
   
    
 Item 10.
    
 Item 11.
    
 Item 12.
    
 Item 13.
    
 Item 14.
    
   
    
 Item 15.

Index to Financial Statements

PART I
Item 1. Business
 
Torchmark Corporation (Torchmark) is an insurance holding company incorporated in Delaware in 1979. Its primary subsidiaries are American Income Life Insurance Company (American Income), Liberty National Life Insurance Company (Liberty National), Globe Life And Accident Insurance Company (Globe), United American Insurance Company (United American), and Family Heritage Life Insurance Company of America (Family Heritage).

Torchmark’s website is: www.torchmarkcorp.com. Torchmark makes available free of charge through its website, its annual report on Form 10-K, its quarterly reports on Form 10-Q, current reports on Form 8-K, and amendments to those reports as soon as reasonably practicable after they have been electronically filed with or furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission. Other information included in Torchmark's website is not incorporated into this filing.
 
The following table presents Torchmark’s business by primary marketing distribution method.
 
 
Primary
Distribution Method
 Company Products and Target Markets Distribution
  
American Income Exclusive Agency 
American Income Life Insurance Company

Waco, Texas
 Individual life and supplemental health insurance marketed to working families. 6,8706,880 producing agents in the U.S., Canada, and New Zealand.
Globe Life Direct Response 
Globe Life And Accident Insurance Company

McKinney, Texas
 Individual life and supplemental health insurance including juvenile and senior life coverage and Medicare Supplement to middle-income Americans. 
Nationwide distribution through direct-to-consumer channels; including direct mail, electronic media and insert media.

Family Heritage Exclusive Agency 
Family Heritage Life Insurance Company of America
Cleveland, Ohio
 Supplemental limited-benefit health insurance to middle-income families. 9091,076 producing agents in the U.S.
Liberty National Exclusive Agency 
Liberty National Life Insurance Company

McKinney, Texas
 Individual life and supplemental health insurance marketed to middle-income families. 1,7582,106 producing agents in the U.S.
United American Independent Agency 
United American
Insurance Company

McKinney, Texas
 Medicare Supplement coverage to Medicare beneficiaries and, to a lesser extent, supplemental limited-benefit health coverage to people under age 65. 4,1444,192 independent producing agents in the U.S.
 
Additional information concerning industry segments may be found in Management’s Discussion and Analysis and in Note 14—Business Segments in the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements.


1
TMK 2017 FORM 10-K

Index to Financial StatementsTable of Contents



Insurance
 
Life Insurance
 
Torchmark’s insurance subsidiaries write a variety of nonparticipating ordinary life insurance products. These include traditional and interest sensitive whole-life insurance, term life insurance, and other life insurance. The following table presents selected information about Torchmark’s life products.
 
Annualized Premium in Force
(Dollar amounts in thousands)
Annualized Premium in Force
(Amounts in thousands)
2017 2016 2015
2016 2015
2014Amount % of
Total
 Amount % of
Total
 Amount   % of
Total
Whole life:





 
 
 
Traditional$1,471,054

$1,378,290

$1,296,403
$1,567,077
 66 $1,471,054
 65 $1,378,290
 64
Interest-sensitive47,358

50,808

54,490
44,286
 2 47,358
 2 50,808
 2
Term657,797

642,599

619,782
664,558
 28 657,797
 29 642,599
 30
Other86,527

78,801

73,870
97,178
 4 86,527
 4 78,801
 4
$2,262,736
 $2,150,498
 $2,044,545
$2,373,099
 100 $2,262,736
 100 $2,150,498
 100
 
The distribution methods for life insurance products include direct response, exclusive agents and independent agents. These methods are described in more depth in the Distribution Method chart earlier in this report. The following table presents life annualized premium in force by distribution method.
Annualized Premium in Force
(Amounts in thousands)
Annualized Premium in Force
(Dollar amounts in thousands)
2016 2015 20142017 2016 2015
Globe Life Direct Response$782,222
 $757,518
 $721,261
$796,628
 $782,222
 $757,518
Exclusive agents:          
American Income966,990
 880,021
 807,935
1,059,216
 966,990
 880,021
Liberty National288,005
 284,597
 285,201
295,235
 288,005
 284,597
Independent agents:          
United American13,292
 14,488
 15,831
12,121
 13,292
 14,488
Other212,227
 213,874
 214,317
209,899
 212,227
 213,874
$2,262,736
 $2,150,498
 $2,044,545
$2,373,099
 $2,262,736
 $2,150,498
 
Health Insurance
 
Torchmark offers Medicare Supplement and limited-benefit supplemental health insurance products that include primarily critical illness and accident plans. These policies are designed to supplement health coverage that applicants already own. Medicare Supplements are also offered to enrollees in the traditional fee-for-service Medicare program. Medicare Supplement plans are standardized by federal regulation and are designed to pay deductibles and co-payments not paid by Medicare.

On July 1, 2016, Torchmark sold its Medicare Part D business to an unaffiliated third party. Torchmark decided to exit its Medicare Part D business due to increasing risks, declining margins, increased risks, higher drug costs, and increased administrative and compliance costs. Management believes this sale allows the Company to better focus on its core protection life and health insurance businesses. As the historical results for the Medicare Part D business are accounted for as discontinued operations, all business results and relevant forward looking statements of the Company are reported as continuing operations, excluding the Medicare Part D business.  For further discussion of the disposition of the Medicare Part D business, see Note 6—Discontinued Operations in the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements..


2
TMK 2017 FORM 10-K

Index to Financial StatementsTable of Contents



The following table presents supplemental health annualized premium in force information for the three years ended December 31, 20162017 by product category.
Annualized Premium in Force
(Amounts in thousands)
Annualized Premium in Force
(Dollar amounts in thousands)
2016 2015 20142017 2016 2015
Amount % of
Total
 Amount % of
Total
 Amount   % of
Total
Amount % of
Total
 Amount % of
Total
 Amount   % of
Total
Medicare Supplement$502,691
 51 $498,696
 51 $488,142
 52$495,982
 49 $502,691
 51 $498,696
 51
Limited-benefit plans495,943
 49 474,346
 49 459,181
 48522,038
 51 495,943
 49 474,346
 49

$998,634
 100 $973,042
 100 $947,323
 100$1,018,020
 100 $998,634
 100 $973,042
 100
 
The following table presents supplemental health annualized premium in force for the three years ended December 31, 20162017 by distribution method.
 
Annualized Premium in Force
(Amounts in thousands)
Annualized Premium in Force
(Dollar amounts in thousands)
2016 2015 20142017 2016 2015
Direct Response$74,261
 $72,423
 $72,659
$76,672
 $74,261
 $72,423
Exclusive agents:          
Liberty National210,260
 216,139
 226,599
205,136
 210,260
 216,139
American Income78,947
 74,058
 71,942
84,775
 78,947
 74,058
Family Heritage249,857
 234,120
 217,742
268,584
 249,857
 234,120
Independent agents:          
United American385,309
 376,302
 358,381
382,853
 385,309
 376,302
$998,634
 $973,042
 $947,323
$1,018,020
 $998,634
 $973,042
 
Annuities
 
Annuity products include single-premium and flexible-premium deferred annuities. Annuities in each of the three years ended December 31, 20162017 comprised less than 1% of premium.
 
Pricing
 
Premium rates for life and health insurance products are established using assumptions as to future mortality, morbidity, persistency, investment income, expenses, and expenses.target profit margins. These assumptions are based on Company experience and projected investment earnings. Revenues for individual life and health insurance products are primarily derived from premium income, and, to a lesser extent, through policy charges to the policyholder account values on annuity products and certain individual life products. Profitability is affected to the extent actual experience deviates from the assumptions made in pricing and to the extent investment income varies from that which is required for policy reserves.
 
Collections for annuity products and certain life products are not recognized as revenues, but are added to policyholder account values. Revenues from these products are derived from charges to the account balances for insurance risk and administrative costs. Profits are earned to the extent these revenues exceed actual costs. Profits are also earned from investment income on the deposits invested in excess of the amounts credited to policyholder accounts.

Underwriting
 
The underwriting standards of each Torchmark insurance subsidiary are established by management. Each subsidiary uses information from the application and, in some cases, telephone interviews with applicants, inspection reports, pharmacy data, doctors’ statements and/or medical examinations to determine whether a policy should be issued in accordance with the application, with a different rating, with a rider, with reduced coverage or rejected.
 

3
TMK 2017 FORM 10-K

Index to Financial StatementsTable of Contents



Reserves
 
The life insurance policy reserves reflected in Torchmark’s financial statements as future policy benefits are calculated based on accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (GAAP). These reserves, with premiums to be received in the future and the interest thereon compounded annually at assumed rates, must be sufficient to cover policy and contract obligations as they mature. Generally, the mortality and persistency assumptions used in the calculations of reserves are based on Company experience. Similar reserves are held on most of the health policies written by Torchmark’s insurance subsidiaries, since these policies generally are issued on a guaranteed-renewable basis. The assumptions used in the calculation of Torchmark’s reserves are reported in Note 1—Significant Accounting Policiesin the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements.. Reserves for annuity products and certain life products consist of the policyholders’ account values and are increased by policyholder deposits and interest credited and are decreased by policy charges and benefit payments.
 
Investments
 
The nature, quality, and percentage mix of insurance company investments are regulated by state laws. The investments of Torchmark insurance subsidiaries consist predominantly of high-quality, investment-grade securities. Fixed maturities representedApproximately 96% of total investmentsour invested assets at fair value are fixed maturities at December 31, 2016.2017. (See Note 4—Investments in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements and Management’s Discussion and Analysis.)
 
Competition
 
Torchmark competes with other insurance carriers through policyholder service, price, product design, and sales efforts. While there are insurance companies competing with Torchmark, no individual company dominates any of Torchmark’s life or health markets.
 
Torchmark’s health insurance products compete with, in addition to the products of other health insurance carriers, health maintenance organizations, preferred provider organizations, and other health care-related institutions which provide medical benefits based on contractual agreements.
 
Management believes Torchmark companies operate at lower policy acquisition and administrative expense levels than peer companies. This allows Torchmark to have competitive rates while maintaining higher underwriting margins.
 
Regulation
 
Insurance. Insurance companies are subject to regulation and supervision in the states in which they do business. The laws of the various states establish agencies with broad administrative and supervisory powers which include, among other things, granting and revoking licenses to transact business, regulating trade practices, licensing agents, approving policy forms, approving certain premium rates, setting minimum reserve and loss ratio requirements, determining the form and content of required financial statements, and prescribing the type and amount of investments permitted. They are also required to file detailed annual reports with supervisory agencies, and records of their business are subject to examination at any time. Under the rules of the National Association of Insurance Commissioners (NAIC), insurance companies are examined periodically by one or more of the supervisory agencies.

Risk Based Capital. The NAIC requires that a risk based capital formula be applied to all life and health insurers. The risk based capital formula is a threshold formula rather than a target capital formula. It is designed only to identify companies that require regulatory attention and is not to be used to rate or rank companies that are adequately capitalized. All Torchmark insurance subsidiaries are more than adequately capitalized under the risk based capital formula.
 
Guaranty Assessments. State guaranty laws provide for assessments from insurance companies to be placed into a fund which is used, in the event of failure or insolvency of an insurance company, to fulfill the obligations of that company to its policyholders. The amount which a company is assessed is based on its proportional share of the premium in each state. AssessmentsA significant portion of assessments are recoverable to a great extent as offsets against state premium taxes. (See Note 15—Commitments and Contingenciesfor current assessment.)
 
Holding Company. States have enacted legislation requiring registration and periodic reporting by insurance companies domiciled within their respective jurisdictions that control or are controlled by other corporations so as to

4
TMK 2017 FORM 10-K

Table of Contents



constitute a holding company system. Torchmark and its subsidiaries have registered as a holding company system pursuant to such legislation in Indiana, Nebraska, Ohio, and New York.

Index to Financial Statements

Insurance holding company system statutes and regulations impose various limitations on investments in subsidiaries, and may require prior regulatory approval for material transactions between insurers and affiliates and for the payment of certain dividends and other distributions.
 
Personnel
 
At the end of 2016,2017, Torchmark had 3,1283,102 employees.

5
TMK 2017 FORM 10-K

Index to Financial Statements
Table of Contents



Item 1A. Risk Factors
 
Risks Related to Our Business
 
Product Marketplace and Operational Risks:
 
The insurance industry is a regulated industry, populated by many public and private companies. We operate in the life and health insurance sectors of the insurance industry, each withof which has its own set of risks.
 
The development and maintenance of our various distribution systems are critical to growth in product sales and profits. AsDevelopment and retention of producing agents are critical to support sales growth in this market because our insurance sales are primarily made to individuals rather than groups and the face amounts of the life insurance policies sold are typically lower than those of policies sold in the higher income market, the development and maintenance of direct-to-consumer systems and development and retention of adequate numbers of producing agents to support sales growth in this market are critical. Adequate compensationhigher-income markets. Compensation that is competitive with other career opportunities and that also motivates producing agents to increase sales is also critical. In Globe Life Direct Response, continuous development of new methods of reaching the consumer and cost efficiency are key. Less than optimum execution of these strategies may result in reduced sales and profits.
 
Economic conditions may materially adversely affect our business and results of operations. We primarily serve primarily the middle-income market for individual protection life and health insurance and, as a result, we compete directly with alternative uses of a customer’s disposable income. If disposable income within this demographic group declines or the use of disposable income becomes more limited as a result of a significant, sustained economic downturn or otherwise, then new sales of our insurance products could become more challenging, and our policyholders may choose to defer paying insurance premiums or stop payingpayment of insurance premiums altogether. Economic conditions could also impact our investment portfolio as discussed under Investment Risks below.
 
Variations in expected to actualexpected-to-actual rates of mortality, morbidity and persistency could materially negatively affect our results of operations and financial condition. We establish a liability for our policy reserves to pay future policyholder benefits and claims. These reserves do not represent an exact calculation of liability, but rather are actuarial estimates based on models that include many assumptions and projections which are inherently uncertain. The reserve computations involve the exercise of significant judgment with respect to levels of mortality, morbidity and persistency, as well as the timing of premium and benefit payments. Even though our actuaries continually test expected-to-actual results, actual levels that occur may differ significantly from the levels assumed when premium rates were first set. Accordingly, we cannot determine with precision the ultimate amounts of claims or benefits that we will pay or the timing of such payments. Significant adverse variations from the levels assumed when policy reserves are first set could requireresult in increased policy obligations to be increased and negatively affect our profit margins and income.
 
A ratings downgrade or other negative action by a rating agency could materially affect our business, financial condition and results of operations. Various rating agencies review the financial performance and condition of insurers, including our insurance subsidiaries, and publish their financial strength ratings as indicators of an insurer’s ability to meet policyholder and contract holder obligations. These ratings are important to maintaining public confidence in our insurance products. A downgrade or other negative action by a rating agency with respect to the financial strength ratings of our insurance subsidiaries could negatively affect us in many ways, including the following:including: limiting or restricting the ability of our insurance subsidiaries to pay dividends to us and adversely affecting our ability to sell insurance products through our independent agencies.
 
Rating agencies also publish credit ratings for us. Credit ratings are indicators of a debt issuer’s ability to meet the terms of debt obligations in a timely manner. These ratings are important to our overall ability to access certain types of liquidity.capital. Actual or anticipated downgrades in our credit ratings, or an announcement that our ratings are under further review for a downgrade, could potentially have a negative effect on our financial condition and results of operations by limiting our access to capital markets, increasing the cost of debt, or impairing our ability to raise capital to refinance maturing debt obligations, thereby potentially limiting our capacity to support growth at our insurance subsidiaries or making it more difficult to maintain or improve the current financial strength ratings of our insurance subsidiaries.

Ratings reflect only the rating agency’s views and are not recommendations to buy, sell or hold our securities. Rating agencies assign ratings based upon several factors. While most of the factors relate to the rated company, some of the factors relate to the views of the rating agency, general economic conditions and circumstances outside the rated company’s control. In addition, rating agencies use various models and formulas to assess the strength of a rated

Index to Financial Statements

company, and from time to time rating agencies have, in their discretion, altered the models. Changes to the models

6
TMK 2017 FORM 10-K

Table of Contents



could impact the rating agencies’ judgment of the rating to be assigned to the rated company. There can be no assurance that our current credit ratings will remain in effect for any given period of time or that such ratings will not be lowered, suspended or withdrawn entirely by the rating agencies, if in each rating agency’s judgment, circumstances so warrant.agencies. We cannot predict what actions the rating agencies may take, or what actions we may take in response to the actions of the rating agencies which could negatively affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.
 
Life Insurance Marketplace Risk:

Our life products are sold in selected niche markets. We are at risk should any of these markets diminish. We have several life distribution channels that focus on distinct market niches, two of which are labor union membersunions and sales via Globe Life Direct Response solicitation. Deterioration of our relationships with organized labor or adverse changes in the public’s receptivity to direct response marketing initiatives could negatively affect thisour life insurance business.
 
Health Insurance Marketplace Risks:

The health insurance market is subject to substantial regulatory scrutiny. Regulatory changes could impact our Medicare Supplement and other supplemental health businesses. The nature and timing of any such changes cannot be predicted and could have a material adverse effect on thatour health insurance business.
 
Competition in the health insurance market can be significant. Sales of our health insurance products are subject to competition from other health insurance companies and alternative healthcare providers, such as those that provide alternatives to traditional Medicare to seniors. In addition, some insurers may be willing to significantly reduce their profit margins or underpriceunder price new sales in order to gain market share. We choose not to compete for market share based on these terms. Accordingly, changes in the competitive landscape, including the pricing strategies employed by our competitors, could negatively impact the future sales of our health insurance products.
 
Obtaining timely and appropriate premium rate increases for certain health insurance policies is critical. A significant percentage of the health insurance premiums that our insurance subsidiaries earn is from Medicare Supplement insurance. Medicare Supplement insurance, and the termsincluding conditions under which the premiums for such policies may be increased, areis highly regulated at both the state and federal level. As a result, it is characterized by lower profit margins than life insurance and requires strict administrative discipline and economies of scale for success. Because Medicare Supplement policies are coordinated with the federal Medicare program, which experiences health care inflation every year, annual premium rate increases for the Medicare Supplement policies are typically necessary. Obtaining timely rate increases is of critical importance to our success in this market. Accordingly, the inability of our insurance subsidiaries to obtain approval of premium rate increases in a timely manner from state insurance regulatory authorities in the future could adversely impact their profitability and thus our business, financial condition and results of operations and financial condition.operations.

Information Security and Technology Risks:
 
The failure to maintain effective and efficient information systems at the Company could compromise secure data thereby adversely affecting our financial condition and results of operations.

Our business operations are highly dependent upon information technology systems to provide efficient and resilient business operations. Malicious actors, employee errors or disasters affecting these information systems could impair our business operations, regulatory compliance and financial condition. To the extent our information systems may be breached by malicious actors, employee malfeasance or technological attacks, an attacker could circumvent security measures in order to access, alter or delete customer or proprietary information from our systems. In addition,systems or to render our systems unavailable for business use. Additionally, we may not become aware of sophisticated or advanced cyber attacks for some time after they occur, thereby increasing the Company's exposure. We may have to incur significant costs to address or remediate interruptions, threats and vulnerabilities in our information and technology systems and to comply with existing and future regulatory requirements related thereto. These risks are heightened as the frequency and sophistication of cyber-attacks increase.

Employee errors in the handling of our information or technology systems may inadvertently result in unauthorized access to customer or proprietary information, or an inability to use our information technology systems to efficiently support business operations.


7
TMK 2017 FORM 10-K

Table of Contents



Additionally, we anticipate more frequent and sophisticated cyber-attacks along with more impactful regulatory oversight models. In addition, an increasing number of states require that customers be notified of unauthorized access, use or disclosure of their confidential information. Any such breach of confidential information could damage our reputation in the

Index to Financial Statements

marketplace, deter potential customers from purchasing our products, result in the loss of existing customers, subject us to significant civil and criminal liability, or require us to incur significant technical, legal or other expenses.

In the event of a disaster, such as a natural catastrophe, an industrial accident, a blackout, or a terrorist attack or war, our computer systems may be inaccessible to our employees, agents or customers for a period of time. A disaster or natural catastrophe, an industrial accident, terrorterrorist attack or war may make our information systems unavailable to support business operations for a period of time, affectingwhich could adversely affect our systems, physical business operations,financial condition and financial condition.results of operations. Even if our employees are able to report to work, they may be unable to perform their duties for an extended period of time if our data or systems are disabled or destroyed and if existing contingency plans cannot function as designed.

Reputational Risk:
 
Damage to the reputation of Torchmark or its subsidiaries could affect our ability to conduct business. Negative publicity through traditional media, internet, social media and other public forums could damage our reputation and adversely impact our agent recruiting efforts, the ability to market our products and the persistency of our block of inforce policies. As discussed above in Information Security and Technology Risks, the Company could be subjected to adverse publicity as a result of a significant security breach.

Investment Risks:
 
Our investments are subject to market and credit risks. Significant downgrades, delinquencies and defaults in our investment portfolio could potentially result in lower net investment income and increased realized and unrealized investment losses. Our invested assets are subject to the customary risks of defaults, downgrades and changes in market values. Our investment portfolio consists almost exclusively,predominately of fixed maturity and short-term investments. A significant portion of our fixed maturity investments is comprised of corporate bonds, exposing usissued by corporations, where we are exposed to the risk that individual corporate issuers will not have the ability to make required interest or principal payments on thean investment. The concentration of these investments in any particular issuer, industry, group of related industries or geographic areas increases this risk. Factors that may affect both market and credit risks include interest rate levels (consisting of both treasury rate and credit spread), financial market performance, disruptions in credit markets, general economic conditions, legislative changes, particular circumstances affecting the businesses or industries of each issuer and other factors beyond our control.

Additionally, as the majority of our investments are longer-term fixed maturities that we typically hold until maturity, significant increases in interest rates widening of credit spreads or inactive markets associated with market downturns could cause a material temporary decline in the fair value of our fixed investment portfolio, even with regard to performing assets. These declines could cause a material increase in unrealized losses in our investment portfolio. Significant unrealized losses can substantially reduce our capital position and shareholders’ equity. It is possible that our investment in certain of these securities with unrealized losses may experience a default event and that a portion or all of that unrealized loss may not be recoverable. In that case, the unrealized loss will be realized, at which point we would take an impairment charge, reducing our net income.
 
We cannot be assured that any particular issuer, regardless of industry, will be able to make required interest and principal payments on a timely basis or at all. Significant downgrades of issuers could negatively impact our risk-based capital ratios, leading to potential downgrades by our rating agencies, potential reduction in future dividend capacity, and/or higher financing costs at the holding company should additional statutory capital be required.
 
Changes in interest rates could negatively affect income. Declines in interest rates expose insurance companies to the risk that they will fail to earn the level of interest on investments assumed in pricing products and in setting discount rates used to calculate the net policy liabilities. While we attempt to manage our investments to earn an excess investment income spread, we providecan give no assurance that a significant and persistent decline in interest rates will not materially affect such spreads. Significant decreases in interest rates could result in calls by issuers of investments, where such features are available to issuers. These calls could result in a decline in our investment income, as reinvestment of the proceeds would likely be at lower rates.


8
TMK 2017 FORM 10-K

Table of Contents



Increases in interest rates could cause the fair value of securities within our bond portfolio to decline. A rise in interest rates could also result in certain policyholders surrendering their annuity policies for cash thereby potentially requiring our insurance subsidiaries to liquidate bonds if other sources of liquidity are not available to meet their obligations. In such a case, realized losses could result from such sales and could adversely affect our statutory income and results of operations.

Index to Financial Statements

Liquidity Risks:
 
Our ability to fund operations is substantially dependent on funds available, primarily dividends, from our insurance subsidiaries. As a holding company with no direct operations, our principal asset is the capital stock of our insurance subsidiaries, which periodically declare and distribute dividends on their capital stock. Moreover, our liquidity, including our ability to pay our operating expenses and to make principal and interest payments on debt securities or other indebtedness owed by us, as well as our ability to pay dividends on our common stock or any preferred stock, depends significantly upon the surplus and earnings of our insurance subsidiaries and the ability of these subsidiaries to pay dividends or to advance or repay funds to us. Other sources of liquidity include a variety of short-term and long-term instruments, including our credit facility, commercial paper, long-term debt, intercompany financing and reinsurance.

The principal sources of our insurance subsidiaries’ liquidity are insurance premiums, as well as investment income, maturities, repayments and other cash flow from our investment portfolio. Our insurance subsidiaries are subject to various state statutory and regulatory restrictions applicable to insurance companies that limit the amount of cash dividends, loans and advances that those subsidiaries may pay to us, including laws establishing minimum solvency and liquidity thresholds. For example, in the states where our companies are domiciled, an insurance company generally may pay dividends only out of its unassigned surplus as reflected in its statutory financial statements filed in that state. Additionally, dividends paid by insurance subsidiaries are restricted based on regulations by their statestates of domicile. Accordingly, impairments in invested assets or a disruption in our insurance subsidiaries’ operations that reduces their capital or cash flow could limit or disallow payment of dividends to us, a principal source of our cash flow.
 
We can give no assurance that more stringent restrictions will not be adopted from time to time by states in which our insurance subsidiaries are domiciled, which could, under certain circumstances, significantly reduce dividends or other amounts paid to us by our subsidiaries. Although we do not anticipate changes, changes in these laws or regulations could constrain the ability of our subsidiaries to pay dividends or to advance or repay funds to us in sufficient amounts and at times necessary to meet our debt obligations and corporate expenses. Additionally, if our insurance subsidiaries were unable to obtain approval of our health premium rate increases in a timely manner from state insurance regulatory authorities, their profitability, and their ability to declare and distribute dividends to us could be negatively impacted. Limitations on the flow of dividends from our subsidiaries could limit our ability to service and repay debt or to pay dividends on our capital stock.

Adverse capital and credit market conditions may significantly affect our ability to meet liquidity needs or access capital, as well as affect our cost of capital. Should treasuryinterest rates increase or credit spreads widenrise in the future, the interest rate on any new debt obligation we may issue could increase and our net income could be reduced. In addition, if the credit and capital markets were to experience significant disruption, uncertainty and instability, these conditions could adversely affect our access to capital. Such market conditions may limit our ability to replace maturing liabilities (in a timely manner or at all) and/or access the capital necessary to grow our business.
 
In the unlikely event that current sources of liquidity do not satisfy our needs, we may have to seek additional financing or raise capital. The availability and cost of additional financing or capital will depend on a variety of factors such as market conditions, the general availability of credit or capital, the volume of trading activities, the overall availability of credit to the insurance industry and our credit ratings and credit capacity. Additionally, customers, lenders or investors could develop a negative perception of our long- or short-term financial prospects if we were to incur large investment losses or if the level of our business activity decreaseswere to decrease due to a market downturn. Our access to funds may also be impaired if regulatory authorities or rating agencies take negative actions against us. If our internal sources of liquidity prove to be insufficient, we may not be able to successfully obtain additional financing on favorable terms or at all. As such, we may be forced to delay raising capital, issue shorter term securities than we prefer or bear an unattractive cost of capital which could decrease our profitability and significantly reduce our financial flexibility. As a result, our results of operations, financial condition and cash flows could be materially negatively affected.


9
TMK 2017 FORM 10-K

Index to Financial StatementsTable of Contents



Regulatory Risks:
 
Our businesses are heavily regulated and changes in regulation may reduce our profitability and growth. Insurance companies, including our insurance subsidiaries, are subject to extensive supervision and regulation in the states in which they do business. The primary purpose of this supervision and regulation is the protection of our policyholders, not our investors. State agencies have broad administrative power over numerous aspects of our business, including premium rates and other terms and conditions that we can include in the insurance policies offered by our insurance subsidiaries, marketing practices, advertising, licensing of agents, policy forms, capital adequacy, solvency, reserves and permitted investments. Also, regulatory authorities have relatively broad discretion to grant, renew or initiate procedures to revoke licenses or approvals. The insurance laws, regulations and policies currently affecting Torchmark and its insurance subsidiaries may change at any time, possibly having an adverse effect on our business. Should these regulatory changes to our business occur, we may be unable to maintain all required licenses and approvals, and our business may not fully comply with the wide variety of applicable laws and regulations or the relevant authority’s interpretation of such laws and regulations, which may change from time to time. If we do not have the requisite licenses and approvals or do not comply with applicable regulatory requirements, the insurance regulatory authorities could preclude or temporarily suspend us from carrying on some or all of our activities and/or impose substantial fines.
 
We cannot predict the timing or substance of any future regulatory initiatives. In recent years, there has been increased scrutiny of insurance companies, including our insurance subsidiaries, by insurance regulatory authorities, which has included more extensive examinations and more detailed review of disclosure documents. These regulatory authorities may bring regulatory or other legal actions against us if, in their view, our practices, or those of our agents or employees, are improper. Such actions could result in substantial fines, penalties and/or prohibitions or restrictions on our business activities, and could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations or financial condition. Additionally, changes in the overall legal or regulatory environment may even absent any particular regulatory authority’s interpretation of an issue changing, cause us to change our views regarding the actions that we need to take from a legal or regulatory risk management perspective, thus necessitating changes to our practices that may, in some cases, limit our ability to grow, impact regulatory capital requirements, or otherwise negatively impact the profitability of our business.profitability.
 
Currently, the U.S. federal government does not directly regulate the business of insurance. However, the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Record and Consumer Protection Act of 2010 established a Federal Insurance Office (FIO) within, charged with monitoring systemic risk exposure in the Department of the Treasury, and the Affordable Care Actinsurance industry, and a Financial Stability Oversight Council (FSOC) created the, which serves to identify and respond to risks and emerging threats to U.S. financial systems. A Center for Consumer Information and Insurance Oversight (CCIIO), originally established under the Department of Health and Human Services, and subsequently transferred tois charged with overseeing implementation of the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS)Affordable Care Act (ACA). The creation of these insurance regulatory offices may indicate that the federal government intends to play a larger role in the direct oversight or regulation of the insurance industry. We cannot predict what impact, if any, the ongoing operations of the FIO, FSOC and CCIIO, as well as any other proposals or executive action for federal oversight or regulation of insurance could have on our business, results of operations or financial condition.

Changes in U.S. federal income tax law could increase our tax costs.costs or negatively impact our insurance subsidiaries' capital. Changes to the Internal Revenue Code, administrative rulings, or court decisions affecting the insurance industry, including the products it offers,insurers offer, could increase our effective tax rate and lower our net income, adversely impact our insurance subsidiaries' capital, or negatively affectlimit the ability of our abilityinsurance subsidiaries to sell somecertain of ourtheir products.
 
Changes in accounting standards issued by accounting standard-setting bodies may affect our financial statements, reduce our reported profitability and change the timing of profit recognition. Our financial statements are subject to the application of GAAP and accounting practices as promulgated by the National Association of Insurance Commissioners’ statutory accounting practices (NAIC SAP), which principles are periodically revised and/or expanded. Accordingly, from time to time we are required to adopt new or revised accounting standards or guidance issued by recognized authoritative bodies. It is possible that future accounting standards that we are required to adopt could change the current accounting treatment that we apply to our consolidated financial statements and that such changes could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition and results of operations. Further, standard setters have a full agenda of unissued topics under review at any given time, many of which have the potential to negatively impact our profitability.


10
TMK 2017 FORM 10-K

Index to Financial StatementsTable of Contents



Non-compliance with restrictions on patientcustomer and consumer privacy and information security, including taking steps to ensure that our business associates who obtain access to sensitive patientcustomer and consumer information maintain its confidentiality, could materially adversely affect our reputation and business operations. The collection, maintenance, use, disclosure and disposal of individually identifiable data by our insurance subsidiaries are regulated at the international, federal and state levels. These laws and rules are subject to change by legislation or administrative or judicial interpretation. Various state laws address the use and disclosure of individually identifiable health data to the extent they are more restrictive than those contained in the privacy and security provisions in the federal Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act of 1999 (GLBA), the Health Information Technology for Economic and Clinical Health Act (HITECH), and in the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996 (HIPAA). HIPAA also requires that we impose privacy and security requirements on our business associates (as that term is defined in the HIPAA regulations). Noncompliance with any privacy laws or any security breach involving the misappropriation, loss or other unauthorized disclosure of sensitive or confidential information, whether by us or by one of our business associates, could have a material adverse effect on our business, reputation and results of operations and could include material fines and penalties, various forms of damages, consent orders regarding our privacy and security practices, adverse actions against our licenses to do business and injunctive relief.
 
Litigation Risk:
 
Litigation could result in substantial judgments against us or our subsidiaries. We are, and in the future may be, subject to litigation in the ordinary course of business. Some of these proceedings have been brought on behalf of various alleged classes of complainants, and, in certain of these matters, the plaintiffs are seeking large and/or indeterminate amounts, including punitive or exemplary damages. Members of our management and legal teams review litigation on a quarterly and annual basis. However, the outcome of any such litigation cannot be predicted with certainty. A number of civil jury verdicts have been returned against insurers in the jurisdictions in which Torchmark and itsour insurance subsidiaries do business involving the insurers’ sales practices, alleged agent misconduct, failure to properly supervise agents and other matters. These lawsuits have resulted in the award of substantial judgments against insurers that are disproportionate to the actual damages, including material amounts of punitive damages. In some states in which we operate, juries have substantial discretion in awarding punitive damages. This discretion creates the potential for unpredictable material adverse judgments in any given punitive damages suit.
 
Our pending and future litigation could adversely affect us because of the costs of defending these cases, the costs of settlement or judgments against us, or changes in our operations that could result from litigation. Substantial legal liability in these or future legal actions could also have a material adverse financial effect or cause significant harm to our reputation, which, in turn, could materially harm our business and our business prospects.

Actual or alleged misclassification of independent contractors at our insurance subsidiaries could result in adverse legal, tax or financial consequences. A significant portion of our sales agents are independent contractors. Although we believe we have properly classified such individuals, a risk nevertheless exists that a court, the IRS or other authority will take the position that those sales agents are employees. The laws and regulations that govern the status and classification of workers are subject to change and differing interpretations, which we cannot predict.
If there is an adverse determination regarding the classification of some or all of the independent contractors at our insurance subsidiaries by a court or governmental agency, we could incur significant costs with respect to payroll tax liabilities, employee benefits, wage payments, fines, judgments and/or legal settlements, any of which could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations. In addition, any resulting reclassification could necessitate significant changes in our affected insurance subsidiaries’ business models.
Catastrophic Event Risk:
 
Our business is subject to the risk of the occurrence of catastrophic events. Our insurance policies are issued to and held by a large number of policyholders throughout the United States in relatively low-face amounts. Accordingly, it is unlikely that a large portion of our policyholder base would be affected by a single natural disaster. However, our insurance operations could be exposed to the risk of catastrophic mortality or morbidity caused by events such as a pandemic, hurricane, earthquake, or man-made catastrophes, including acts of terrorism or war, which may produce significant claims in larger areas, especially those that are heavily populated. Claims resulting from natural or man-made catastrophic events could cause substantial volatility in our financial results for any fiscal quarter or year and could materially reduce our profitability or harm our financial condition.
 

11
TMK 2017 FORM 10-K

Table of Contents

Index to Financial Statements


Item 1B. Unresolved Staff Comments
 
As of December 31, 2016,2017, Torchmark had no unresolved staff comments.
 
Item 2. Properties
 
Torchmark, through its subsidiaries, owns or leases buildings that are used in the normal course of business. Torchmark owns and occupies a 300,000 square foot facility in McKinney, Texas. This facility is Torchmark’s corporate headquarters and also houses the operations of a subsidiary, United American, as well as many operations of other subsidiaries. In addition, United American leases 5,000 square feet of space in Omaha, Nebraska and, through a subsidiary, leases 2,5003,230 square feet of office space in Syracuse, New York.
 
Liberty National, also in McKinney, Texas, leases a 24,000 square foot facility in Hoover, Alabama (a Birmingham suburb). An 8,000 square foot facility is leased for storage in Pelham, Alabama.
 
Globe leases 34,000 square feet of office area in the Cotter Tower building located in downtown Oklahoma City, Oklahoma. Globe also leases 11,000 square feet at a nearby facility used for storage. Globe Marketing Services, a subsidiary of Globe, owns a 133,000 square foot facility in Oklahoma City which houses the Globe Life Direct Response operation.
 
American Income owns and occupies two buildings located in Waco, Texas: 70,000 square foot building for corporate operations and a 43,000 square foot printing facility. American Income also leases 10,800 square feet in a building across the street from the main office building. American Income also leases office space throughout the United States to support its marketing operations.
 
Family Heritage owns 50% of a partnership that owns a 66,000 square foot building in Broadview Heights, Ohio (a suburb of Cleveland), serving as Family Heritage’s headquarters. The partnership also leases a portion of the building to unrelated tenants.


Item 3. Legal Proceedings
 
Torchmark and its subsidiaries, in common with the insurance industry in general, are subject to litigation, including claims involving tax matters, alleged breaches of contract, torts, including bad faith and fraud claims based on alleged wrongful or fraudulent acts of agents of Torchmark’s subsidiaries, employment discrimination, and miscellaneous other causes of action. Based upon information presently available, and in light of legal and other factual defenses available to Torchmark and its subsidiaries, management does not believe that such litigation will have a material adverse effect on Torchmark’s financial condition, future operating results or liquidity; however, assessing the eventual outcome of litigation necessarily involves forward-looking speculation as to judgments to be made by judges, juries and appellate courts in the future. This bespeaks caution, particularly in states with reputations for high punitive damage verdicts. Torchmark’s management recognizes that large punitive damage awards bearing little or no relation to actual damages continue to be awarded by juries in jurisdictions in which Torchmark and its subsidiaries have substantial business, creating the potential for unpredictable material adverse judgments in any given punitive damage suit.
See further discussion of litigation and unclaimed property audits in Note 15—Commitments and Contingencies.


Item 4. Mine Safety Disclosures.
 
Not Applicable.

12
TMK 2017 FORM 10-K

Index to Financial Statements
Table of Contents



PART II

Item 5. Market for Registrant’s Common Equity,
Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities
 
Market Price of and Dividends on the Registrant’s Common Equity and Related Stockholder Matters
The principal market in which Torchmark’s common stock is traded is the New York Stock Exchange. There were 2,8082,662 shareholders of record on December 31, 2016,2017, excluding shareholder accounts held in nominee form. The market prices and cash dividends paid by calendar quarter for the past two years are presented in the following table.
 
  2016
Market Price
 Dividends
Per Share
  2017
Market Price
 Dividends
Per Share
Quarter  High Low   High Low 
1  $57.01
 $48.58
 $0.1350
  $78.71
 $73.00
 $0.140
2  62.39
 52.83
 0.1400
  77.77
 74.11
 0.150
3  65.21
 60.38
 0.1400
  80.09
 74.68
 0.150
4  74.83
 63.17
 0.1400
  91.16
 80.32
 0.150
Year-end closing price$73.76
 
 
 
$90.71
 
 
 
  2015
Market Price
 Dividends
Per Share
  2016
Market Price
 Dividends
Per Share
Quarter  High Low   High Low 
1  $55.66
 $50.07
 $0.1267
  $57.01
 $48.58
 $0.135
2  59.15
 54.98
 0.1350
  62.39
 52.83
 0.140
3  63.12
 55.62
 0.1350
  65.21
 60.38
 0.140
4  61.19
 55.36
 0.1350
  74.83
 63.17
 0.140
Year-end closing price$57.16
 
 
 
$73.76
 
 
 

The line graph shown below compares Torchmark’s cumulative total return on its common stock with the cumulative total returns of the Standard and Poor’s 500 Stock Index (S&P 500) and the Standard and Poor’s Life & Health Insurance Index (S&P Life & Health Insurance). Torchmark is one of the companies whose stock is included within both the S&P 500 and the S&P Life & Health Insurance Index.
*100 invested on 12/31/1112 in stock or index, including reinvestment of dividends. Fiscal year ended December 31st.
(Copyright © 20172018 Standard & Poor's, a division of S&P Global. All rights reserved.) 

13
TMK 2017 FORM 10-K

Index to Financial StatementsTable of Contents



Purchases of Certain Equity Securities by the Issuer and Others for the Fourth Quarter 20162017
Period(a) Total Number
of Shares
Purchased

(b) Average
Price Paid
Per Share

(c) Total Number of
Shares Purchased
as Part of Publicly
Announced Plans
or Programs

(d) Maximum Number
of Shares (or
Approximate Dollar
Amount) that May
Yet Be Purchased
Under the Plans or
Programs
October 1-31, 2016411,933
 $64.36
 411,933
 
November 1-30, 2016175,770
 62.40
 175,770
 
December 1-31, 2016757,089
 73.90
 757,089
 
Period(a) Total Number
of Shares
Purchased
 (b) Average
Price Paid
Per Share
 (c) Total Number of
Shares Purchased
as Part of Publicly
Announced Plans
or Programs
 (d) Maximum Number
of Shares (or
Approximate Dollar
Amount) that May
Yet Be Purchased
Under the Plans or
Programs
October 1-31, 2017260,690
 $82.44
 260,690
 
November 1-30, 2017593,200
 85.22
 593,200
 
December 1-31, 2017439,315
 89.91
 439,315
 
 
On August 4, 2016,7, 2017, Torchmark’s Board reaffirmed its continued authorization of the Company’s stock repurchase program in amounts and with timing that management, in consultation with the Board, determined to be in the best interest of the Company. The program has no defined expiration date or maximum number of shares to be purchased.


 
 


14
TMK 2017 FORM 10-K

Index to Financial Statements
Table of Contents



Item 6. Selected Financial Data
The following information should be read in conjunction with Torchmark’s Consolidated Financial Statements and related notes reported elsewhere in this Form 10-K:
(AmountsDollar amounts in thousands except per share and percentage data)
Year ended December 31,2016 2015 2014 2013 20122017 2016 2015 2014 2013
Premium revenue:                  
Life$2,189,333
 $2,073,065
 $1,966,300
 $1,885,332
 $1,808,524
$2,306,547
 $2,189,333
 $2,073,065
 $1,966,300
 $1,885,332
Health947,663
 925,520
 869,440
 863,818
 730,019
976,373
 947,663
 925,520
 869,440
 863,818
Other38
 135
 400
 532
 559
15
 38
 135
 400
 532
Total3,137,034
 2,998,720
 2,836,140
 2,749,682
 2,539,102
3,282,935
 3,137,034
 2,998,720
 2,836,140
 2,749,682
Net investment income806,903
 773,951
 758,286
 734,650
 716,132
847,885
 806,903
 773,951
 758,286
 734,650
Realized investment gains (losses)(10,683) (8,791) 23,548
 7,990
 37,833
23,611
 (10,683) (8,791) 23,548
 7,990
Total revenue3,934,629
 3,766,065
 3,620,095
 3,494,253
 3,294,644
4,155,573
 3,934,629
 3,766,065
 3,620,095
 3,494,253
Income from continuing operations, net of tax(1)
539,590
 516,293
 528,074
 507,205
 509,297
1,458,263
 539,590
 516,293
 528,074
 507,205
Income from discontinued operations, net of tax10,189
 10,807
 14,865
 21,267
 20,027
(3,769) 10,189
 10,807
 14,865
 21,267
Net income(1)
549,779
 527,100
 542,939
 528,472
 529,324
1,454,494
 549,779
 527,100
 542,939
 528,472
Per common share:                  
Basic earnings:                  
Income from continuing operations4.50
 4.13
 4.04
 3.68
 3.51
12.53
 4.50
 4.13
 4.04
 3.68
Income from discontinued operations0.08
 0.08
 0.11
 0.16
 0.14
(0.03) 0.08
 0.08
 0.11
 0.16
Net income4.58
 4.21
 4.15
 3.84
 3.65
12.50
 4.58
 4.21
 4.15
 3.84
Diluted earnings:(1)
                  
Income from continuing operations4.41
 4.07
 3.98
 3.63
 3.47
12.26
 4.41
 4.07
 3.98
 3.63
Income from discontinued operations0.08
 0.09
 0.11
 0.16
 0.13
(0.04) 0.08
 0.09
 0.11
 0.16
Net income4.49
 4.16
 4.09
 3.79
 3.60
Net income(1)
12.22
 4.49
 4.16
 4.09
 3.79
Cash dividends declared0.56
 0.54
 0.51
 0.45
 0.40
0.60
 0.56
 0.54
 0.51
 0.45
Cash dividends paid0.56
 0.53
 0.49
 0.44
 0.38
0.59
 0.56
 0.53
 0.49
 0.44
Basic average shares outstanding120,001
 125,095
 130,722
 137,647
 144,921
Diluted average shares outstanding(1)
122,368
 126,757
 132,640
 139,564
 146,848
Basic weighted average shares outstanding116,343
 120,001
 125,095
 130,722
 137,647
Diluted weighted average shares outstanding118,983
 122,368
 126,757
 132,640
 139,564
                  
As of December 31,2016 2015 2014 2013 20122017 2016 2015 2014 2013
Cash and invested assets$15,955,891
 $14,405,073
 $15,058,996
 $13,456,944
 $14,155,919
$17,853,047
 $15,955,891
 $14,405,073
 $15,058,996
 $13,456,944
Total assets21,436,087
 19,853,213
 20,272,259
 18,217,757
 18,810,132
23,474,985
 21,436,087
 19,853,213
 20,272,259
 18,217,757
Short-term debt264,475
 490,129
 238,398
 229,070
 319,043
328,067
 264,475
 490,129
 238,398
 229,070
Long-term debt1,133,165
 743,733
 992,130
 990,865
 989,686
1,132,201
 1,133,165
 743,733
 992,130
 990,865
Shareholders' equity(1)4,566,861
 4,055,552
 4,697,466
 3,776,342
 4,361,786
6,231,421
 4,566,861
 4,055,552
 4,697,466
 3,776,342
Per diluted share(1)
37.76
 32.71
 36.19
 27.66
 30.56
Effect of fixed maturity revaluation on diluted equity per share(1,2)
5.63
 2.62
 8.28
 1.81
 7.07
Per diluted common share(1)
52.95
 37.76
 32.71
 36.19
 27.66
Effect of fixed maturity revaluation on diluted
equity per common share(2)
13.18
 5.63
 2.62
 8.28
 1.81
Annualized premium in force:                  
Life2,262,736
 2,150,498
 2,044,545
 1,955,401
 1,895,017
2,373,099
 2,262,736
 2,150,498
 2,044,545
 1,955,401
Health998,634
 973,042
 947,323
 887,444
 902,753
1,018,020
 998,634
 973,042
 947,323
 887,444
Total3,261,370
 3,123,540
 2,991,868
 2,842,845
 2,797,770
3,391,119
 3,261,370
 3,123,540
 2,991,868
 2,842,845
Basic shares outstanding118,031
 122,370
 127,930
 134,252
 141,353
114,593
 118,031
 122,370
 127,930
 134,252
Diluted shares outstanding(1)
120,958
 123,996
 129,812
 136,537
 142,707
117,696
 120,958
 123,996
 129,812
 136,537

(1)
Certain current year amounts were prospectively adjustedOn December 22, 2017, the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act was enacted into law which revises corporate income tax rates from 35% to give effect to21%, among other modifications. See further discussion of the adoption of ASU 2016-09 related to excess tax benefits from stock compensation as described in Note 1—Significant Accounting Policiesunder "Accounting Pronouncements Adoptedreform implications in the Current Year."Results of Operations. Excluding the effects of tax reform, net income, net income per diluted common share, shareholders' equity and shareholders' equity per diluted common share would have been $581 million, $4.88, $5.36 billion and $45.52, respectively.
(2)
There is accounting guidance (ASC 320-10-35-1, Investments- Debt and Equity Securities) requiring available-for-sale fixed maturities to be recorded at fair value each period. The effect of this rule on diluted equity per share reflects the amount added or (deducted) under this rule to produce GAAP Shareholders’ equity per share. See discussion under the caption Capital Resources in Management’s Discussion and Analysis in this report concerning the effect this rule has on Torchmark’s equity.


15
TMK 2017 FORM 10-K

Table of Contents

Index to Financial Statements

Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
 
The following discussion should be read in conjunction with the Selected Financial Data and Torchmark’s Consolidated Financial Statements and Notes thereto appearing elsewhere in this report.
 
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
 
How Torchmark Views Its Operations: Torchmark is the holding company for a group of insurance companies which market primarily individual life, and supplemental health insurance to middle income households throughout the United States. We view our operations by segments, which are the insurance product lines of life, health, and annuities, and the investment segment that supports the product lines. Segments are aligned based on their common characteristics, comparability of the profit margins, and management techniques used to operate each segment.
 
Insurance Product Line Segments. As fully explained in Note 14—Business Segments in the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements, the insurance product line segments involve the marketing, underwriting, and the administration of policies. Each product line is further segmented by the various distribution units that market the insurance policies. Each distribution unit operates in a niche market offering insurance products designed for that particular market. Whether analyzing profitability of a segment as a whole, or the individual distribution units within the segment, the measure of profitability used by management is the underwriting margin, which is:
 
Premium revenue
Less:
Policy obligations
Policy acquisition costs and commissions
 
Investment Segment. The investment segment involves the management of our capital resources, including investments and the management of corporate debt and liquidity. Our measure of profitability for the investment segment is excess investment income, which is:
 
Net investment income
Less:
Required interest on net policy liabilities
Financing costs

 
The tables in Note 14—Business Segments in the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements reconcile Torchmark’s revenues and expenses by segment to its major income statement line items for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2016. Additionally, this Note provides a summary of the profitability measures that demonstrate year-to-year comparability and which reconciles to net income. That summary is reproduced below from the ConsolidatedFinancial Statements to present our overall operations in the manner that we use to manage the business.2017.
 

16
TMK 2017 FORM 10-K

Index to Financial Statements
Table of Contents



AnalysisCurrent Year Highlights:

Net income as a return on equity (ROE) was 28.2%(1) and net operating income as a ROE, excluding net unrealized gains on the fixed maturity portfolio was 14.3%(1).

Total premium increased by 5% over the prior year. Life premium also increased by 5% for the year from $2.2 billion to $2.3 billion. Life underwriting margin also increased 5% from $574 million in 2016 to $604 million in 2017.

Net investment income increased 5% over the prior year. In addition, excess investment income, a measure used by management as explained below, increased by 7% over the prior year.

During 2017, the Company repurchased 4.1 million shares at a total cost of Profitability by Segment$325 million for an average share price of $78.67.
(Dollar amounts in thousands)
 2016 2015 2014 2016
Change
 % 2015
Change
 %
Life insurance underwriting margin$573,762
 $569,402
 $556,489
 $4,360
 1
 $12,913
 2
Health insurance underwriting margin210,056
 204,377
 199,319
 5,679
 3
 5,058
 3
Annuity underwriting margin9,394
 4,568
 4,312
 4,826
 106
 256
 6
Excess investment income224,031
 219,504
 224,364
 4,527
 2
 (4,860) (2)
Other insurance:      
   
  
Other income1,534
 2,379
 2,354
 (845) (36) 25
 1
Administrative expense(196,598) (186,191) (174,832) (10,407) 6
 (11,359) 6
Corporate and adjustments(34,913) (37,667) (40,362) 2,754
 (7) 2,695
 (7)
Pre-tax total787,266
 776,372
 771,644
 10,894
 1
 4,728
 1
Applicable taxes(1)
(237,906) (253,459) (252,041) 15,553
 (6) (1,418) 1
Net operating income from continuing operations(2)
549,360
 522,913
 519,603
 26,447
 5
 3,310
 1
Discontinued operations (after tax)(3)
10,189
 10,807
 14,865
 (618) (6) (4,058) (27)
Total559,549
 533,720
 534,468
 25,829
 5
 (748) 
Realized gains (losses)—investments (after tax)(6,944) (5,714) 15,306
 (1,230)   (21,020)  
Legal settlement expenses (after tax)
 
 (1,519) 
   1,519
  
Administrative settlements (after tax)(2,467) (906) (5,316) (1,561)   4,410
  
Non-operating fees (after tax)(359) 
 
 (359)   
  
Net income$549,779
 $527,100
 $542,939
 $22,679
 4
 $(15,839) (3)
(1) Certain current year amounts were prospectively adjusted to give effect to the adoption of ASU 2016-09 related to excess tax benefits from stock compensation as described in Note 1—Significant Accounting Policiesunder "Accounting Pronouncements Adopted in the Current Year."
(2)NetThe following represents net income and net operating income from continuing operations isfor the consolidated total of segment profits after3 years ended December 31, 2017.

(1)As further discussed below regarding Tax Legislation, excluding the tax reform adjustment, net income as a ROE and net operating income as a ROE would have been 11.7% and 14.4%, respectively. In 2017, the Company recorded a one-time adjustment of $874 million impacting net income. As the impact of the Tax Legislation was treated as a non-operating event, it was excluded from net operating income.

Net income as a ROE and net operating income as sucha ROE, excluding net unrealized gains on the fixed maturity portfolioin 2016 were 12.0% and 14.6%, respectively and 11.9% and 14.5%, respectively in 2015. Net operating income as a ROE, excluding net unrealized gains on the fixed maturity portfolio is considered a Non-GAAPnon-GAAP measure. See Note 14—Business Segments for reconciliationManagement utilizes this measure to view the most directly comparable GAAP measure and for discussionbusiness without the effect of the usefulness and purpose of this measure.unrealized gains or losses which are primarily attributable to fluctuation in interest rates on the available-for-sale portfolio.
(3) Income from discontinued operations (after tax) is included for purposes of reconciling to net income.

Torchmark’s operations on a segment-by-segment basis are discussed in depth under the appropriate captions following in this report.
Summary of Operations: As shownNet income was $1.5 billion in the above chart, net income was2017, compared with $550 million in 2016. This sharp increase was due to an $874 million increase to net income, primarily relating to a reduction of deferred income tax liabilities resulting from enactment of the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2017 (Tax Legislation). See further discussion below. Net income also increased in 2016 compared withfrom $527 million in 2015. Net income decreased in 2015 from $543 million in 2014. On a diluted per common share basis, 20162017 net income rose

17
TMK 2017 FORM 10-K

Table of Contents



172% to $12.22 after an 8% to $4.49 after a 2% increase in 2015.2016, again largely related to implementation of the Tax Legislation. Without the impact of the Tax Legislation, net income per diluted common share would have been $4.88. Net income per diluted common share in 20152016 rose to $4.49 from $4.16 from $4.09 in 2014.2015. The per share results have exceeded the growth in dollar amounts due to our share repurchase program. Each year’s per share net income was affected by realized investment gains (losses), which were $0.15, $(0.06), $(0.05), and $0.12,$(0.05), in 2017, 2016 2015 and 2014,2015, respectively. More information concerning realized investment gains and losses can be found under the caption Realized Gains and Losses in this report.

Net operating income from continuing operations rose each year over the prior year from $520 million in 2014 to $523 million in 2015 to $549 million in 2016. Also,2016 to $574 million in 2017. Net operating income is the consolidated total of segment profits after tax and as explained insuch is considered a non-GAAP measure. Net income is the most directly comparable GAAP measure. See Note 14—Business Segments in the Notes tofor a discussion of the Consolidated Financial Statements, weusefulness and purpose of this measure. We do not consider realized gains and losses to be a component of our core insurance operations or operating segments. Additionally, net income was affected by certain significant and unusual non-operating items in each of the years 20142015 through 2016.2017. We do not view these items as components of core operating results because they are not indicative of past performance or future prospects of the insurance operations. Accordingly, as described in Note 14—Business Segments in the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements, weWe remove items such as these that relate to prior periods or are non-operating items when evaluating the results of current operations, and therefore exclude such matters from our segment analysis for current periods.

Effective JulyTax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2017: On December 22, 2017, the Tax Legislation was enacted which changed existing tax law, including a reduction of the corporate income tax rate from 35% to 21% effective January 1, 2016, Torchmark sold2018. The Company recorded $877 million of tax benefits in net income as a result of re-measuring its Medicare Part D Prescription Drug Plan businessdeferred tax liabilities using the lower corporate tax rate as of the date of enactment. Based on the analysis of the Tax Legislation, the Company was able to determine that this amount is a reasonable estimate of the impact of the Tax Legislation in accordance with SEC Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 118. However, the Company will continue to analyze relevant information to complete the accounting for income taxes which may result in an unaffiliated third party. Torchmark decidedadjustment to exit its Medicare Part D businessincome tax expense in 2018. The accounting is expected to be complete when the 2017 U.S. corporate income tax returns are filed later in 2018. In addition, the Company early adopted ASU 2018-02, Income Statement—Reporting Comprehensive Income (Topic 220): Reclassification of Certain Tax Effects from Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income, and recorded a $252 million reclassification from Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income to Retained Earnings to eliminate the stranded tax effects associated with the tax rate change, primarily relating to the unrealized gains and losses on the available-for-sale fixed maturity portfolio. More information concerning income taxes is provided in Note 8—Income Taxes.

There will be substantial long-term benefits from the Tax Legislation due to declining margins, increased risks, higher drug costs,the taxation of future profits at the new 21% tax rate. Looking forward, we are anticipating the effective tax rate on our net operating income before stock compensation expense to decrease and increased administrativebe in the range of 19% to 20%. Despite the lower expected tax rate for financial reporting purposes, in the short and compliance costs. This sale allowsintermediate term, we do not anticipate a significant reduction in our current tax expense, as benefits of the Company to better focus on its core protection life and health insurance businesses and provides additional capital to invest. The financial results of this business arelower tax rate will be virtually offset by several provisions included in the Tax Legislation that increase the Company's current taxable income.

The below table illustrates the impact of the tax reform adjustment on certain balances.
 Prior to tax adjustment Tax reform adjustment GAAP balance
Current and deferred income taxes payable$2,189,402
 $(877,400) $1,312,002
Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss)1,171,874
 252,400
 1,424,274
Retained earnings4,181,208
 625,000
 4,806,208
Shareholders' equity5,357,443
 873,978
 6,231,421
Income before income taxes834,028
 (3,380) 830,648
Income tax benefit (expense)(249,743) 877,358
 627,615
Net income580,516
 873,978
 1,454,494
Total diluted net income per common share$4.88
 $7.34
 $12.22



18
TMK 2017 FORM 10-K

Index to Financial StatementsTable of Contents



excluded from Torchmark's continuingTorchmark’s operations includingon a segment-by-segment basis are discussed in depth under the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements, other than Note 2—Statutory Accounting and Note 6—Discontinued Operations.appropriate captions following in this report.

Analysis of Profitability by Segment
(Dollar amounts in thousands)
 2017 2016 2015 2017
Change
 % 2016
Change
 %
Life insurance underwriting margin$604,337
 $573,762
 $569,402
 $30,575
 5
 $4,360
 1
Health insurance underwriting margin219,508
 210,056
 204,377
 9,452
 4
 5,679
 3
Annuity underwriting margin10,562
 9,394
 4,568
 1,168
 12
 4,826
 106
Excess investment income239,363
 224,031
 219,504
 15,332
 7
 4,527
 2
Other insurance:      
   
  
Other income1,270
 1,534
 2,379
 (264) (17) (845) (36)
Administrative expense(210,590) (196,598) (186,191) (13,992) 7
 (10,407) 6
Corporate and other(43,285) (34,913) (37,667) (8,372) 24
 2,754
 (7)
Pre-tax total821,165
 787,266
 776,372
 33,899
 4
 10,894
 1
Applicable taxes(247,484) (237,906) (253,459) (9,578) 4
 15,553
 (6)
Net operating income from continuing operations573,681
 549,360
 522,913
 24,321
 4
 26,447
 5
Discontinued operations—Part D, net of tax
 9,033
 10,807
 (9,033) (100) (1,774) (16)
Net operating income573,681
 558,393
 533,720
 15,288
 3
 24,673
 5
Reconciling items, net of tax:             
Realized gains (losses)—investments17,590
 (6,944) (5,714) 24,534
   (1,230)  
Part D adjustments—discontinued operations(3,769) 1,156
 
 (4,925)   1,156
  
Guaranty fund assessments(1,171) 
 
 (1,171)   
  
Administrative settlements(5,628) (2,467) (906) (3,161)   (1,561)  
Non-operating fees(187) (359) 
 172
   (359)  
Tax reform adjustment873,978
 
 
 873,978
   
  
Net income$1,454,494
 $549,779
 $527,100
 $904,715
 165
 $22,679
 4

The life insurance segment is our strongest segment and is the largest contributor to earnings in each year presented. This segment contributed $31 million in 2017 and $4 million in 2016 and $13 million in 2015 to the growth in our underwriting margin. Also contributing to growth in income in both years was our health insurance segment, which provided $6$9 million of additional margin in 20162017 and $5$6 million in 2015.2016.
 
Excess investment income, the measure of profitability of our investment segment, increased 7% to $224$239 million or 2% from the prior year amount of $220$224 million. In 2015,2016, excess investment income decreasedincreased 2%. Investment yields continue to be pressured by reinvesting proceeds frominvesting at yields lower than the yield on dispositions at lower rates relative toand the fixed maturity assets being disposed of and spreads related to required interestaverage yield on net policy liabilities throughout the three-year period. Excess investment income has also been hampered by a lag in government reimbursements of Medicare Part D costs. The impact of the lost investment income from delayed receipt of reimbursements is reflected in income from continuing operations rather than discontinued operations in accordance with applicable accounting rules. As noted previously, the Medicare Part D business has been classified as discontinued operations.portfolio.
 
Total revenues rose 4%6% in 20162017 to $3.9$4.2 billion, or $169$221 million over the prior year total of $3.8$3.9 billion. Life premium rose 6%5% or $117 million in 2017 to $2.3 billion. Life premium increased $116 million in 2016 to $2.2 billion. Life premium increased $107 million in 2015 to $2.1 billion. Net investment income rose $16$41 million or 2%5% in 2015,2017, and rose 4% or $33 million in 2016. Health premium increased 3% to $976 million in 2017 and contributed $29 million to 2017 revenue growth, after having gained 2% to $948 million in 2016 and2016. Health premium contributed $22 million to 2016 revenue growth, after having gained 6% to $926 million in 2015. Health premium contributed $56 million to 2015 revenue growth.
 
Life insurance premium and underwriting margins have grown steadily in each of the last three years ended December 31, 2016.2017. The increase in life premium was driven by sales growth and improvements in persistency. While premium and underwriting margins grew, margin as a percent of premium declinedremained flat in 2016 to2017 at 26%, after decreasing from 28%27% to 27%26% from 20142015 to 2015. These declines were due primarily2016. Net life sales increased in 2017 to higher than expected Globe Life Direct Response policy obligations.$416 million. Net life sales were flat in 2016 at $412 million after increasing 9% in 2015.between 2015 and 2016. The life insurance segment is discussed further in this report under the caption Life Insurance.
 
Health insurance premium income increased 2%3% to $948$976 million in 2016.2017. Health net sales fell 7%rose 9% to $145$158 million during 2016, as a result of a 20% decrease in Medicare Supplement sales. The decrease in 2016 Medicare Supplement net sales was expected2017 due to both individual and group sales returning to a more normal level after unusually high sales in 2014.sales. Group sales vary significantly from period to period due to the

19
TMK 2017 FORM 10-K

Table of Contents



impact of large groups that are sold from time to time.time-to-time. First-year collected health premium fell 11%3% to $140$136 million from the prior year total of $157$140 million as a result of a high level of grouphigher net sales in Medicare Supplement in the third and fourth quartersquarter of 20142015 that positively affected the 20152016 first-year collected premium. Health margins as a percentage of premium were flat at 22%, with underwriting income increasing to $210$220 million for 20162017 due to the growth in premium income. Underwriting income was $210 million in 2016 compared with $204 million forin 2015. The health insurance segment is discussed further in this report under the same period in 2015 compared with $199 million in 2014.caption Health Insurance.

We do not currently market annuities. See the caption Annuities for discussion of the Annuity segment.
 
The investment segment’s pretax profitability, or excessExcess investment income, is based on three major components: net investment income, required interest on net policy liabilities (interest applicable to insurance products), and financing costs. In 2016,2017, net investment income rose 4%5%, compared with 2%4% in 2015.2016. At the same time, our investment portfolio grew 6% in 20162017 and 3%,2016, on an amortized cost basis, in 2015.basis. In recent years, the percentage growth in net investment income has not grown as fast asbeen less than the growth in the overall investment portfolio due primarily to new investments being made at yield rates lower than the yield rates earned on securities that matured or were otherwise disposed.dispositions and the average yield on the portfolio. The growth rate of net investment income is sometimes impacted at times by a lag between the time when proceeds from maturities and dispositions are received and when the proceeds are reinvested, during which the funds are held in cash. In addition, Torchmark’s share repurchase program (described later under this caption) has diverted cash that could have otherwise been used to acquire investments and increase net investment income. NetThe growth in the investment income was negatively impacted during 2014 throughportfolio has been augmented in 2017 and 2016 bydue to the receipt of certain receivables that had accumulated under our Medicare Part D business. Under the program, we were required to cover certain costs in the current period that are the federal government’s responsibility, but are not reimbursed until late in the next calendar year. This delay in reimbursement reduced our funds available for investment in each year, resulting in reduced investment income.
 
The interest required on net policy liabilities is deducted from net investment income, and generally grows in conjunction with the net policy liabilities that are supported by the invested assets. The lower new-money yields resulting from the

Index to Financial Statements

low interest rate environment noted above have compressed excess investment income as required interest has continued to grow at approximately the same rate that net policy liabilities have grown. Financing costs, which consist of the interest required for debt service on our long and short-term debt, are also deducted from net investment income. Financing costs in 20162017 increased 9%1% to $85 million from $83 million from $77 million in 2015.2016. The additional interest expense resulted primarily from an increase in the cost of our short-term borrowings and, in lesser part, from the issuance of our new 6.125%5.275% Junior Subordinated Debt security seventythirty-six days before the maturity and repayment of our 6.375% Senior Notes.5.875% Junior Subordinated Debt security.
 
Torchmark’s current investment policy regarding fixed maturities limits new fixed maturity acquisitions to investment-grade securities generally with longer maturities (often exceeding twenty years) that meet our quality and yield objectives. Approximately 96% of our invested assets at fair value are fixed maturities, of which 95% were investment grade at December 31, 2016. The average quality rating of the portfolio was BBB+. The portfolio contains no securities backed by subprime or Alt-A mortgages, no direct investment in residential mortgages, no credit default swaps, or other derivative contracts. See the analysis of excess investment income and investment activities under the caption Investments in this report and Note 4—Investments in the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements for a more detailed discussion of this segment.

Insurance administrative expenses were up 5.6%7.1% in 20162017 when compared with the prior year period, and increased to 6.3%6.4% as a percentage of premium from 6.3% in 2016 and 6.2% in 2015 and 2014.2015. The increase in administrative expenses is primarily due to an increase in other employee costs and investments in information technology that will enhance our customer experience, improve our data analytic capabilities, improve our abilitytechnology. Corporate and Other expenses were up primarily due to adapt to future changes and bolster our information security programs. Stockan increase in stock-based compensation expense, declined $2 million in 2016 to $26.3 millionreflecting Torchmark's higher share price as compared with the same period a decreaseyear ago, and recognition of $4 milliona one-time increase in 2015 to $28.7 million. The decline in stockstock-based compensation expense in 2016 and 2015 resulted primarily from lower expense associated with performance shares as well as lower option values on 2016 and 2015 option awards.due to the Tax Legislation.



20
TMK 2017 FORM 10-K

Table of Contents



Share PurchasesHealth Insurance
Torchmark hasoffers Medicare Supplement and limited-benefit supplemental health insurance products that include primarily critical illness and accident plans. These policies are designed to supplement health coverage that applicants already own. Medicare Supplements are offered to enrollees in placethe traditional fee-for-service Medicare program. Medicare Supplement plans are standardized by federal regulation and are designed to pay deductibles and co-payments not paid by Medicare.

On July 1, 2016, Torchmark sold its Medicare Part D business to an ongoing share repurchase programunaffiliated third party. Torchmark decided to exit its Medicare Part D business due to increasing risks, declining margins, higher drug costs, and increased administrative and compliance costs. Management believes this sale allows the Company to better focus on its core protection life and health insurance businesses. As the historical results for the Medicare Part D business are accounted for as discontinued operations, all business results and relevant forward looking statements of the Company are reported as continuing operations, excluding the Medicare Part D business.  For further discussion of the disposition of the Medicare Part D business, see Note 6—Discontinued Operations.


2
TMK 2017 FORM 10-K

Table of Contents



The following table presents supplemental health annualized premium in force information for the three years ended December 31, 2017 by product category.
 
Annualized Premium in Force
(Dollar amounts in thousands)
 2017 2016 2015
 Amount % of
Total
 Amount % of
Total
 Amount   % of
Total
Medicare Supplement$495,982
 49 $502,691
 51 $498,696
 51
Limited-benefit plans522,038
 51 495,943
 49 474,346
 49

$1,018,020
 100 $998,634
 100 $973,042
 100
The following table presents supplemental health annualized premium in force for the three years ended December 31, 2017 by distribution method.
 
Annualized Premium in Force
(Dollar amounts in thousands)
 2017 2016 2015
Direct Response$76,672
 $74,261
 $72,423
Exclusive agents:     
Liberty National205,136
 210,260
 216,139
American Income84,775
 78,947
 74,058
Family Heritage268,584
 249,857
 234,120
Independent agents:     
United American382,853
 385,309
 376,302
 $1,018,020
 $998,634
 $973,042
Annuities
Annuity products include single-premium and flexible-premium deferred annuities. Annuities in each of the three years ended December 31, 2017 comprised less than 1% of premium.
Pricing
Premium rates for life and health insurance products are established using assumptions as to future mortality, morbidity, persistency, investment income, expenses, and target profit margins. These assumptions are based on Company experience and projected investment earnings. Revenues for individual life and health insurance products are primarily derived from premium income, and, to a lesser extent, through policy charges to the policyholder account values on annuity products and certain individual life products. Profitability is affected to the extent actual experience deviates from the assumptions made in pricing and to the extent investment income varies from that required for policy reserves.
Collections for annuity products and certain life products are not recognized as revenues, but are added to policyholder account values. Revenues from these products are derived from charges to the account balances for insurance risk and administrative costs. Profits are earned to the extent these revenues exceed actual costs. Profits are also earned from investment income in excess of the amounts credited to policyholder accounts.

Underwriting
The underwriting standards of each Torchmark insurance subsidiary are established by management. Each subsidiary uses information from the application and, in some cases, telephone interviews with applicants, inspection reports, pharmacy data, doctors’ statements and/or medical examinations to determine whether a policy should be issued in accordance with the application, with a different rating, with a rider, with reduced coverage or rejected.

3
TMK 2017 FORM 10-K

Table of Contents



Reserves
The life insurance policy reserves reflected in Torchmark’s financial statements as future policy benefits are calculated based on accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (GAAP). These reserves, with premiums to be received in the future and the interest thereon compounded annually at assumed rates, must be sufficient to cover policy and contract obligations as they mature. Generally, the mortality and persistency assumptions used in the calculations of reserves are based on Company experience. Similar reserves are held on most of the health policies written by Torchmark’s insurance subsidiaries, since these policies generally are issued on a guaranteed-renewable basis. The assumptions used in the calculation of Torchmark’s reserves are reported in Note 1—Significant Accounting Policies. Reserves for annuity products and certain life products consist of the policyholders’ account values and are increased by policyholder deposits and interest credited and are decreased by policy charges and benefit payments.
Investments
The nature, quality, and percentage mix of insurance company investments are regulated by state laws. The investments of Torchmark insurance subsidiaries consist predominantly of high-quality, investment-grade securities. Approximately 96% of our invested assets at fair value are fixed maturities at December 31, 2017. (SeeNote 4—Investments and Management’s Discussion and Analysis.)
Competition
Torchmark competes with other insurance carriers through policyholder service, price, product design, and sales efforts. While there are insurance companies competing with Torchmark, no individual company dominates any of Torchmark’s life or health markets.
Torchmark’s health insurance products compete with, in addition to the products of other health insurance carriers, health maintenance organizations, preferred provider organizations, and other health care-related institutions which beganprovide medical benefits based on contractual agreements.
Management believes Torchmark companies operate at lower policy acquisition and administrative expense levels than peer companies. This allows Torchmark to have competitive rates while maintaining higher underwriting margins.
Regulation
Insurance. Insurance companies are subject to regulation and supervision in 1986. With no specified authorization amount, we determine the states in which they do business. The laws of the various states establish agencies with broad administrative and supervisory powers which include, among other things, granting and revoking licenses to transact business, regulating trade practices, licensing agents, approving policy forms, approving certain premium rates, setting minimum reserve and loss ratio requirements, determining the form and content of required financial statements, and prescribing the type and amount of repurchasesinvestments permitted. They are also required to file detailed annual reports with supervisory agencies, and records of their business are subject to examination at any time. Under the rules of the National Association of Insurance Commissioners (NAIC), insurance companies are examined periodically by one or more of the supervisory agencies.

Risk Based Capital. The NAIC requires that a risk based capital formula be applied to all life and health insurers. The risk based capital formula is a threshold formula rather than a target capital formula. It is designed only to identify companies that require regulatory attention and is not to be used to rate or rank companies that are adequately capitalized. All Torchmark insurance subsidiaries are more than adequately capitalized under the risk based capital formula.
Guaranty Assessments. State guaranty laws provide for assessments from insurance companies to be placed into a fund which is used, in the event of failure or insolvency of an insurance company, to fulfill the obligations of that company to its policyholders. The amount which a company is assessed is based on the amountits proportional share of the excess cash flow atpremium in each state. A significant portion of assessments are recoverable as offsets against state premium taxes. (See Note 15—Commitments and Contingenciesfor current assessment.)
Holding Company. States have enacted legislation requiring registration and periodic reporting by insurance companies domiciled within their respective jurisdictions that control or are controlled by other corporations so as to

4
TMK 2017 FORM 10-K

Table of Contents



constitute a holding company system. Torchmark and its subsidiaries have registered as a holding company system pursuant to such legislation in Indiana, Nebraska, Ohio, and New York.

Insurance holding company system statutes and regulations impose various limitations on investments in subsidiaries, and may require prior regulatory approval for material transactions between insurers and affiliates and for the Parent Company, general market conditions,payment of certain dividends and other alternative uses. distributions.
Personnel
At the end of 2017, Torchmark had 3,102 employees.

5
TMK 2017 FORM 10-K

Table of Contents



Item 1A. Risk Factors
Risks Related to Our Business
Product Marketplace and Operational Risks:
The majorityinsurance industry is a regulated industry, populated by many public and private companies. We operate in the life and health insurance sectors of the industry, each of which has its own set of risks.
The development and maintenance of our various distribution systems are critical to growth in product sales and profits. Development and retention of producing agents are critical to support sales growth in this market because our insurance sales are primarily made to individuals rather than groups and the face amounts of the life insurance policies sold are typically lower than those of policies sold in higher-income markets. Compensation that is competitive with other career opportunities and motivates producing agents to increase sales is also critical. In Globe Life Direct Response, continuous development of new methods of reaching the consumer and cost efficiency are key. Less than optimum execution of these purchases are made from excess cash flow. Excess cash flow atstrategies may result in reduced sales and profits.
Economic conditions may materially adversely affect our business and results of operations. We primarily serve the Parent Company is primarily comprisedmiddle-income market for individual protection life and health insurance and, as a result, we compete directly with alternative uses of dividends received froma customer’s disposable income. If disposable income within this demographic group declines or the insurance subsidiaries less interest expense paid on its debt, dividends paid to Torchmark shareholders, and otheruse of disposable income becomes more limited operating activities. Additionally, when stock options are exercised, proceeds from these exercises and the tax benefit are used to repurchase additional shares on the open market to minimize dilution as a result of a significant, sustained economic downturn or otherwise, then new sales of our insurance products could become more challenging, and our policyholders may choose to defer or stop payment of insurance premiums altogether. Economic conditions could also impact our investment portfolio as discussed under Investment Risks below.
Variations in expected-to-actual rates of mortality, morbidity and persistency could materially negatively affect our results of operations and financial condition. We establish policy reserves to pay future policyholder benefits and claims. These reserves do not represent an exact calculation of liability, but rather are actuarial estimates based on models that include many assumptions and projections which are inherently uncertain. The reserve computations involve the option exercises. exercise of significant judgment with respect to levels of mortality, morbidity and persistency, as well as the timing of premium and benefit payments. Even though our actuaries continually test expected-to-actual results, actual levels that occur may differ significantly from the levels assumed when premium rates were first set. Accordingly, we cannot determine with precision the ultimate amounts of claims or benefits that we will pay or the timing of such payments. Significant adverse variations from the levels assumed when policy reserves are first set could result in increased policy obligations and negatively affect our profit margins and income.
A ratings downgrade or other negative action by a rating agency could materially affect our business, financial condition and results of operations. Various rating agencies review the financial performance and condition of insurers, including our insurance subsidiaries, and publish their financial strength ratings as indicators of an insurer’s ability to meet policyholder and contract holder obligations. These ratings are important to maintaining public confidence in our insurance products. A downgrade or other negative action by a rating agency with respect to the financial strength ratings of our insurance subsidiaries could negatively affect us in many ways, including: limiting or restricting the ability of our insurance subsidiaries to pay dividends to us and adversely affecting our ability to sell insurance products through our independent agencies.
Rating agencies also publish credit ratings for us. Credit ratings are indicators of a debt issuer’s ability to meet the terms of debt obligations in a timely manner. These ratings are important to our overall ability to access certain types of capital. Actual or anticipated downgrades in our credit ratings, or an announcement that our ratings are under further review for a downgrade, could potentially have a negative effect on our financial condition and results of operations by limiting our access to capital markets, increasing the cost of debt, or impairing our ability to raise capital to refinance maturing debt obligations, thereby potentially limiting our capacity to support growth at our insurance subsidiaries or making it more difficult to maintain or improve the current financial strength ratings of our insurance subsidiaries.

Ratings reflect only the rating agency’s views and are not recommendations to buy, sell or hold our securities. Rating agencies assign ratings based upon several factors. While most of the factors relate to the rated company, some of the factors relate to the views of the rating agency, general economic conditions and circumstances outside the rated company’s control. In addition, rating agencies use various models and formulas to assess the strength of a rated company, and from time to time rating agencies have, in their discretion, altered the models. Changes to the models

6
TMK 2017 FORM 10-K

Table of Contents



could impact the rating agencies’ judgment of the rating to be assigned to the rated company. There can be no assurance that our current credit ratings will remain in effect for any given period of time or that such ratings will not be lowered, suspended or withdrawn entirely by the rating agencies. We cannot predict what actions the rating agencies may take, or what actions we may take in response to the actions of the rating agencies which could negatively affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.
Life Insurance Marketplace Risk:

Our life products are sold in selected niche markets. We are at risk should any of these markets diminish. We have several life distribution channels that focus on distinct market niches, two of which are labor unions and sales via Globe Life Direct Response solicitation. Deterioration of our relationships with organized labor or adverse changes in the public’s receptivity to direct response marketing initiatives could negatively affect our life insurance business.
Health Insurance Marketplace Risks:

The health insurance market is subject to substantial regulatory scrutiny. Regulatory changes could impact our Medicare Supplement and other supplemental health businesses. The nature and timing of any such changes cannot be predicted and could have a material adverse effect on our health insurance business.
Competition in the health insurance market can be significant. Sales of our health insurance products are subject to competition from other health insurance companies and alternative healthcare providers, such as those that provide alternatives to traditional Medicare to seniors. In addition, some insurers may be willing to significantly reduce their profit margins or under price new sales in order to gain market share. We choose not to compete for market share based on these terms. Accordingly, changes in the competitive landscape, including the pricing strategies employed by our competitors, could negatively impact the future sales of our health insurance products.
Obtaining timely and appropriate premium rate increases for certain health insurance policies is critical. A significant percentage of the health insurance premiums that our insurance subsidiaries earn is from Medicare Supplement insurance. Medicare Supplement insurance, including conditions under which the premiums for such policies may be increased, is highly regulated at both the state and federal level. As a result, it is characterized by lower profit margins than life insurance and requires strict administrative discipline and economies of scale for success. Because Medicare Supplement policies are coordinated with the federal Medicare program, which experiences health care inflation every year, annual premium rate increases for the Medicare Supplement policies are typically necessary. Obtaining timely rate increases is of critical importance to our success in this market. Accordingly, the inability of our insurance subsidiaries to obtain approval of premium rate increases in a timely manner from state insurance regulatory authorities in the future could adversely impact their profitability and thus our business, financial condition and results of operations.

Information Security and Technology Risks:
The failure to maintain effective and efficient information systems at the Company could compromise secure data thereby adversely affecting our financial condition and results of operations. Our business operations are highly dependent upon information technology systems to provide efficient and resilient business operations. Malicious actors, employee errors or disasters affecting these information systems could impair our business operations, regulatory compliance and financial condition. To the extent our information systems may be breached by malicious actors, employee malfeasance or technological attacks, an attacker could circumvent security measures in order to access, alter or delete customer or proprietary information from our systems or to render our systems unavailable for business use. Additionally, we may not become aware of sophisticated cyber attacks for some time after they occur, thereby increasing the Company's exposure. We may have to incur significant costs to address or remediate interruptions, threats and vulnerabilities in our information and technology systems and to comply with existing and future regulatory requirements related thereto. These risks are heightened as the frequency and sophistication of cyber-attacks increase.

Employee errors in the handling of our information or technology systems may inadvertently result in unauthorized access to customer or proprietary information, or an inability to use our information technology systems to efficiently support business operations.


7
TMK 2017 FORM 10-K

Table of Contents



Additionally, we anticipate more frequent and sophisticated cyber-attacks along with more impactful regulatory oversight models. In addition, an increasing number of states require that customers be notified of unauthorized access, use or disclosure of their confidential information. Any such breach of confidential information could damage our reputation in the marketplace, deter potential customers from purchasing our products, result in the loss of existing customers, subject us to significant civil and criminal liability, or require us to incur significant technical, legal or other expenses.

In the event of a disaster, such as a natural catastrophe, an industrial accident, a blackout, or a terrorist attack or war, our computer systems may be inaccessible to our employees, agents or customers for a period of time. A disaster or natural catastrophe, an industrial accident, terrorist attack or war may make our information systems unavailable to support business operations for a period of time, which could adversely affect our financial condition and results of operations. Even if our employees are able to report to work, they may be unable to perform their duties for an extended period of time if our data or systems are disabled or destroyed and existing contingency plans cannot function as designed.

Reputational Risk:
Damage to the reputation of Torchmark or its subsidiaries could affect our ability to conduct business. Negative publicity through traditional media, internet, social media and other public forums could damage our reputation and adversely impact our agent recruiting efforts, the ability to market our products and the persistency of our block of inforce policies. As discussed above in Information Security and Technology Risks, the Company could be subjected to adverse publicity as a result of a significant security breach.

Investment Risks:
Our investments are subject to market and credit risks. Significant downgrades, delinquencies and defaults in our investment portfolio could potentially result in lower net investment income and increased realized and unrealized investment losses. Our invested assets are subject to the customary risks of defaults, downgrades and changes in market values. Our investment portfolio consists predominately of fixed maturity and short-term investments issued by corporations, where we are exposed to the risk that individual corporate issuers will not have the ability to make required interest or principal payments on an investment. The concentration of these investments in any particular issuer, industry, group of related industries or geographic areas increases this risk. Factors that may affect both market and credit risks include interest rate levels (consisting of both treasury rate and credit spread), financial market performance, disruptions in credit markets, general economic conditions, legislative changes, particular circumstances affecting the businesses or industries of each issuer and other factors beyond our control.

Additionally, as the majority of our investments are longer-term fixed maturities that we typically hold until maturity, significant increases in interest rates or inactive markets associated with market downturns could cause a material temporary decline in the fair value of our fixed investment portfolio, even with regard to performing assets. These declines could cause a material increase in unrealized losses in our investment portfolio. Significant unrealized losses can substantially reduce our capital position and shareholders’ equity. It is possible that our investment in certain of these securities with unrealized losses may experience a default event and that a portion or all of that unrealized loss may not be recoverable. In that case, the unrealized loss will be realized, at which point we would take an impairment charge, reducing our net income.
We cannot be assured that any particular issuer, regardless of industry, will be able to make required interest and principal payments on a timely basis or at all. Significant downgrades of issuers could negatively impact our risk-based capital ratios, leading to potential downgrades by our rating agencies, potential reduction in future dividend capacity, and/or higher financing costs at the holding company should additional statutory capital be required.
Changes in interest rates could negatively affect income. Declines in interest rates expose insurance companies to the risk that they will fail to earn the level of interest on investments assumed in pricing products and in setting discount rates used to calculate the net policy liabilities. While we attempt to manage our investments to earn an excess investment income spread, we can give no assurance that a significant and persistent decline in interest rates will not materially affect such spreads. Significant decreases in interest rates could result in calls by issuers of investments, where such features are available to issuers. These calls could result in a decline in our investment income, as reinvestment of the proceeds would likely be at lower rates.


8
TMK 2017 FORM 10-K

Table of Contents



Increases in interest rates could cause the fair value of securities within our bond portfolio to decline. A rise in interest rates could also result in certain policyholders surrendering their annuity policies for cash thereby potentially requiring our insurance subsidiaries to liquidate bonds if other sources of liquidity are not available to meet their obligations. In such a case, realized losses could result from such sales and could adversely affect our statutory income and results of operations.

Liquidity Risks:
Our ability to fund operations is substantially dependent on funds available, primarily dividends, from our insurance subsidiaries. As a holding company with no direct operations, our principal asset is the capital stock of our insurance subsidiaries, which periodically declare and distribute dividends on their capital stock. Moreover, our liquidity, including our ability to pay our operating expenses and to make principal and interest payments on debt securities or other indebtedness owed by us, as well as our ability to pay dividends on our common stock or any preferred stock, depends significantly upon the surplus and earnings of our insurance subsidiaries and the ability of these subsidiaries to pay dividends or to advance or repay funds to us. Other sources of liquidity include a variety of short-term and long-term instruments, including our credit facility, commercial paper, long-term debt, intercompany financing and reinsurance.

The principal sources of our insurance subsidiaries’ liquidity are insurance premiums, as well as investment income, maturities, repayments and other cash flow from our investment portfolio. Our insurance subsidiaries are subject to various state statutory and regulatory restrictions applicable to insurance companies that limit the amount of cash dividends, loans and advances that those subsidiaries may pay to us, including laws establishing minimum solvency and liquidity thresholds. For example, in the states where our companies are domiciled, an insurance company generally may pay dividends only out of its unassigned surplus as reflected in its statutory financial statements filed in that state. Additionally, dividends paid by insurance subsidiaries are restricted based on regulations by their states of domicile. Accordingly, impairments in assets or a disruption in our insurance subsidiaries’ operations that reduces their capital or cash flow could limit or disallow payment of dividends to us, a principal source of our cash flow.
We can give no assurance that more stringent restrictions will not be adopted from time to time by states in which our insurance subsidiaries are domiciled, which could, under certain circumstances, significantly reduce dividends or other amounts paid to us by our subsidiaries. Although we do not anticipate changes, changes in laws or regulations could constrain the ability of our subsidiaries to pay dividends or to advance or repay funds to us in sufficient amounts and at times necessary to meet our debt obligations and corporate expenses. Additionally, if our insurance subsidiaries were unable to obtain approval of our health premium rate increases in a timely manner from state insurance regulatory authorities, their profitability, and their ability to declare and distribute dividends to us could be negatively impacted. Limitations on the flow of dividends from our subsidiaries could limit our ability to service and repay debt or to pay dividends on our capital stock.

Adverse capital and credit market conditions may significantly affect our ability to meet liquidity needs or access capital, as well as affect our cost of capital. Should interest rates rise in the future, the interest rate on any new debt obligation we may issue could increase and our net income could be reduced. In addition, if the credit and capital markets were to experience significant disruption, uncertainty and instability, these conditions could adversely affect our access to capital. Such market conditions may limit our ability to replace maturing liabilities (in a timely manner or at all) and/or access the capital necessary to grow our business.
In the unlikely event that current sources of liquidity do not satisfy our needs, we may have to seek additional financing or raise capital. The availability and cost of additional financing or capital will depend on a variety of factors such as market conditions, the general availability of credit or capital, the volume of trading activities, the overall availability of credit to the insurance industry and our credit ratings and credit capacity. Additionally, customers, lenders or investors could develop a negative perception of our financial prospects if we were to incur large investment losses or if the level of our business activity were to decrease due to a market downturn. Our access to funds may also be impaired if regulatory authorities or rating agencies take negative actions against us. If our internal sources of liquidity prove to be insufficient, we may not be able to successfully obtain additional financing on favorable terms or at all. As such, we may be forced to delay raising capital, issue shorter term securities than we prefer or bear an unattractive cost of capital which could decrease our profitability and significantly reduce our financial flexibility. As a result, our results of operations, financial condition and cash flows could be materially negatively affected.


9
TMK 2017 FORM 10-K

Table of Contents



Regulatory Risks:
Our businesses are heavily regulated and changes in regulation may reduce our profitability and growth. Insurance companies, including our insurance subsidiaries, are subject to extensive supervision and regulation in the states in which they do business. The primary purpose of this supervision and regulation is the protection of our policyholders, not our investors. State agencies have broad administrative power over numerous aspects of our business, including premium rates and other terms and conditions that we can include in the insurance policies offered by our insurance subsidiaries, marketing practices, advertising, licensing of agents, policy forms, capital adequacy, solvency, reserves and permitted investments. Also, regulatory authorities have relatively broad discretion to grant, renew or initiate procedures to revoke licenses or approvals. The insurance laws, regulations and policies currently affecting Torchmark and its insurance subsidiaries may change at any time, possibly having an adverse effect on our business. Should these regulatory changes occur, we may be unable to maintain all required licenses and approvals, and our business may not fully comply with the wide variety of applicable laws and regulations or the relevant authority’s interpretation of such laws and regulations, which may change from time to time. If we do not have the requisite licenses and approvals or do not comply with applicable regulatory requirements, the insurance regulatory authorities could preclude or temporarily suspend us from carrying on some or all of our activities and/or impose substantial fines.
We cannot predict the timing or substance of any future regulatory initiatives. In recent years, there has been increased scrutiny of insurance companies, including our insurance subsidiaries, by insurance regulatory authorities, which has included more extensive examinations and more detailed review of disclosure documents. These regulatory authorities may bring regulatory or other legal actions against us if, in their view, our practices, or those of our agents or employees, are improper. Such actions could result in substantial fines, penalties and/or prohibitions or restrictions on our business activities, and could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations or financial condition. Additionally, changes in the overall legal or regulatory environment may cause us to change our views regarding the actions that we need to take from a legal or regulatory risk management perspective, thus necessitating changes to our practices that may, in some cases, limit our ability to grow, impact regulatory capital requirements, or otherwise negatively impact our profitability.
Currently, the U.S. federal government does not directly regulate the business of insurance. However, the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Record and Consumer Protection Act of 2010 established a Federal Insurance Office (FIO), charged with monitoring systemic risk exposure in the insurance industry, and a Financial Stability Oversight Council (FSOC), which serves to identify and respond to risks and emerging threats to U.S. financial systems. A Center for Consumer Information and Insurance Oversight (CCIIO), established under the Department of Health and Human Services, is charged with overseeing implementation of the Affordable Care Act (ACA). The creation of these insurance regulatory offices may indicate that the federal government intends to play a larger role in the direct oversight or regulation of the insurance industry. We cannot predict what impact, if any, the ongoing operations of the FIO, FSOC and CCIIO, as well as any other proposals or executive action for federal oversight or regulation of insurance could have on our business, results of operations or financial condition.

Changes in U.S. federal income tax law could increase our tax costs or negatively impact our insurance subsidiaries' capital. Changes to the Internal Revenue Code, administrative rulings, or court decisions affecting the insurance industry, including the products insurers offer, could increase our effective tax rate and lower our net income, adversely impact our insurance subsidiaries' capital, or limit the ability of our insurance subsidiaries to sell certain of their products.
Changes in accounting standards issued by accounting standard-setting bodies may affect our financial statements, reduce our reported profitability and change the timing of profit recognition. Our financial statements are subject to the application of GAAP and accounting practices as promulgated by the National Association of Insurance Commissioners’ statutory accounting practices (NAIC SAP), which principles are periodically revised and/or expanded. Accordingly, from time to time we are required to adopt new or revised accounting standards or guidance issued by recognized authoritative bodies. It is possible that future accounting standards that we are required to adopt could change the current accounting treatment that we apply to our consolidated financial statements and that such changes could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition and results of operations. Further, standard setters have a full agenda of unissued topics under review at any given time, many of which have the potential to negatively impact our profitability.


10
TMK 2017 FORM 10-K

Table of Contents



Non-compliance with restrictions on customer and consumer privacy and information security, including taking steps to ensure that our business associates who obtain access to sensitive customer and consumer information maintain its confidentiality, could materially adversely affect our reputation and business operations. The collection, maintenance, use, disclosure and disposal of individually identifiable data by our insurance subsidiaries are regulated at the international, federal and state levels. These laws and rules are subject to change by legislation or administrative or judicial interpretation. Various state laws address the use and disclosure of individually identifiable health data to the extent they are more restrictive than those contained in the privacy and security provisions in the federal Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act of 1999 (GLBA), the Health Information Technology for Economic and Clinical Health Act (HITECH), and in the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996 (HIPAA). HIPAA also requires that we impose privacy and security requirements on our business associates (as that term is defined in the HIPAA regulations). Noncompliance with any privacy laws or any security breach involving the misappropriation, loss or other unauthorized disclosure of sensitive or confidential information, whether by us or by one of our business associates, could have a material adverse effect on our business, reputation and results of operations and could include material fines and penalties, various forms of damages, consent orders regarding our privacy and security practices, adverse actions against our licenses to do business and injunctive relief.
Litigation Risk:
Litigation could result in substantial judgments against us or our subsidiaries. We are, and in the future may be, subject to litigation in the ordinary course of business. Some of these proceedings have been brought on behalf of various alleged classes of complainants, and, in certain of these matters, the plaintiffs are seeking large and/or indeterminate amounts, including punitive or exemplary damages. Members of our management and legal teams review litigation on a quarterly and annual basis. However, the outcome of any such litigation cannot be predicted with certainty. A number of civil jury verdicts have been returned against insurers in the jurisdictions in which our insurance subsidiaries do business involving the insurers’ sales practices, alleged agent misconduct, failure to properly supervise agents and other matters. These lawsuits have resulted in the award of substantial judgments against insurers that are disproportionate to the actual damages, including material amounts of punitive damages. In some states in which we operate, juries have substantial discretion in awarding punitive damages. This discretion creates the potential for unpredictable material adverse judgments in any given punitive damages suit.
Our pending and future litigation could adversely affect us because of the costs of defending these cases, the costs of settlement or judgments against us, or changes in our operations that could result from litigation. Substantial legal liability in these or future legal actions could also have a material adverse financial effect or cause significant harm to our reputation, which, in turn, could materially harm our business and our business prospects.

Actual or alleged misclassification of independent contractors at our insurance subsidiaries could result in adverse legal, tax or financial consequences. A significant portion of our sales agents are independent contractors. Although we believe we have properly classified such individuals, a risk nevertheless exists that a court, the IRS or other authority will take the position that those sales agents are employees. The laws and regulations that govern the status and classification of workers are subject to change and differing interpretations, which we cannot predict.
If there is an adverse determination regarding the classification of some or all of the independent contractors at our insurance subsidiaries by a court or governmental agency, we could incur significant costs with respect to payroll tax liabilities, employee benefits, wage payments, fines, judgments and/or legal settlements, any of which could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations. In addition, any resulting reclassification could necessitate significant changes in our affected insurance subsidiaries’ business models.
Catastrophic Event Risk:
Our business is subject to the risk of the occurrence of catastrophic events. Our insurance policies are issued to and held by a large number of policyholders throughout the United States in relatively low-face amounts. Accordingly, it is unlikely that a large portion of our policyholder base would be affected by a single natural disaster. However, our insurance operations could be exposed to the risk of catastrophic mortality or morbidity caused by events such as a pandemic, hurricane, earthquake, or man-made catastrophes, including acts of terrorism or war, which may produce significant claims in larger areas, especially those that are heavily populated. Claims resulting from natural or man-made catastrophic events could cause substantial volatility in our financial results for any fiscal quarter or year and could materially reduce our profitability or harm our financial condition.

11
TMK 2017 FORM 10-K

Table of Contents




Item 1B. Unresolved Staff Comments
As of December 31, 2017, Torchmark had no unresolved staff comments.
Item 2. Properties
Torchmark, through its subsidiaries, owns or leases buildings that are used in the normal course of business. Torchmark owns and occupies a 300,000 square foot facility in McKinney, Texas. This facility is Torchmark’s corporate headquarters and also houses the operations of a subsidiary, United American, as well as many operations of other subsidiaries. In addition, United American leases 5,000 square feet of space in Omaha, Nebraska and, through a subsidiary, leases 3,230 square feet of office space in Syracuse, New York.
Liberty National, also in McKinney, Texas, leases a 24,000 square foot facility in Hoover, Alabama (a Birmingham suburb). An 8,000 square foot facility is leased for storage in Pelham, Alabama.
Globe leases 34,000 square feet of office area in the Cotter Tower building located in downtown Oklahoma City, Oklahoma. Globe also leases 11,000 square feet at a nearby facility used for storage. Globe Marketing Services, a subsidiary of Globe, owns a 133,000 square foot facility in Oklahoma City which houses the Globe Life Direct Response operation.
American Income owns and occupies two buildings located in Waco, Texas: 70,000 square foot building for corporate operations and a 43,000 square foot printing facility. American Income also leases 10,800 square feet in a building across the street from the main office building. American Income also leases office space throughout the United States to support its marketing operations.
Family Heritage owns 50% of a partnership that owns a 66,000 square foot building in Broadview Heights, Ohio (a suburb of Cleveland), serving as Family Heritage’s headquarters. The partnership also leases a portion of the building to unrelated tenants.


Item 3. Legal Proceedings
Torchmark and its subsidiaries, in common with the insurance industry in general, are subject to litigation, including claims involving tax matters, alleged breaches of contract, torts, including bad faith and fraud claims based on alleged wrongful or fraudulent acts of agents of Torchmark’s subsidiaries, employment discrimination, and miscellaneous other causes of action. Based upon information presently available, and in light of legal and other factual defenses available to Torchmark and its subsidiaries, management does not believe that such litigation will have a material adverse effect on Torchmark’s financial condition, future operating results or liquidity; however, assessing the eventual outcome of litigation necessarily involves forward-looking speculation as to judgments to be made by judges, juries and appellate courts in the future. This bespeaks caution, particularly in states with reputations for high punitive damage verdicts. Torchmark’s management recognizes that large punitive damage awards bearing little or no relation to actual damages continue to be awarded by juries in jurisdictions in which Torchmark and its subsidiaries have substantial business, creating the potential for unpredictable material adverse judgments in any given punitive damage suit.
See further discussion of litigation and unclaimed property audits in Note 15—Commitments and Contingencies.


Item 4. Mine Safety Disclosures.
Not Applicable.

12
TMK 2017 FORM 10-K

Table of Contents



PART II

Item 5. Market for Registrant’s Common Equity,
Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities
Market Price of and Dividends on the Registrant’s Common Equity and Related Stockholder Matters
The principal market in which Torchmark’s common stock is traded is the New York Stock Exchange. There were 2,662 shareholders of record on December 31, 2017, excluding shareholder accounts held in nominee form. The market prices and cash dividends paid by calendar quarter for the past two years are presented in the following table.
   2017
Market Price
 Dividends
Per Share
Quarter  High Low 
1  $78.71
 $73.00
 $0.140
2  77.77
 74.11
 0.150
3  80.09
 74.68
 0.150
4  91.16
 80.32
 0.150
Year-end closing price$90.71
 
 
 
   2016
Market Price
 Dividends
Per Share
Quarter  High Low 
1  $57.01
 $48.58
 $0.135
2  62.39
 52.83
 0.140
3  65.21
 60.38
 0.140
4  74.83
 63.17
 0.140
Year-end closing price$73.76
 
 
 

The line graph shown below compares Torchmark’s cumulative total return on its common stock with the cumulative total returns of the Standard and Poor’s 500 Stock Index (S&P 500) and the Standard and Poor’s Life & Health Insurance Index (S&P Life & Health Insurance). Torchmark is one of the companies whose stock is included within both the S&P 500 and the S&P Life & Health Insurance Index.
*100 invested on 12/31/12 in stock or index, including reinvestment of dividends. Fiscal year ended December 31st.
(Copyright © 2018 Standard & Poor's, a division of S&P Global. All rights reserved.)

13
TMK 2017 FORM 10-K

Table of Contents



Purchases of Certain Equity Securities by the Issuer and Others for the Fourth Quarter 2017
Period(a) Total Number
of Shares
Purchased
 (b) Average
Price Paid
Per Share
 (c) Total Number of
Shares Purchased
as Part of Publicly
Announced Plans
or Programs
 (d) Maximum Number
of Shares (or
Approximate Dollar
Amount) that May
Yet Be Purchased
Under the Plans or
Programs
October 1-31, 2017260,690
 $82.44
 260,690
 
November 1-30, 2017593,200
 85.22
 593,200
 
December 1-31, 2017439,315
 89.91
 439,315
 
On August 7, 2017, Torchmark’s Board reaffirmed its continued authorization of Directors has authorized the Company’s sharestock repurchase program in amounts and with timing that management, in consultation with the Board, determinesdetermined to be in the best interest of the Company and its shareholders.Company. The following chart summarizes share purchase activity for eachprogram has no defined expiration date or maximum number of the last three years.shares to be purchased.


 
Analysis


14
TMK 2017 FORM 10-K

Table of Share PurchasesContents



Item 6. Selected Financial Data
The following information should be read in conjunction with Torchmark’s Consolidated Financial Statements and related notes reported elsewhere in this Form 10-K:
(AmountsDollar amounts in thousands)thousands except per share and percentage data)
 2016 2015 2014
PurchasesShares Amount Shares Amount Shares Amount
Excess cash flow at the Parent Company5,208
 $311,332
 6,292
 $358,552
 7,155
 $375,042
Option proceeds1,487
 93,452
 1,049
 59,974
 1,394
 74,266
Total6,695
 $404,784
 7,341
 $418,526
 8,549
 $449,308
Year ended December 31,2017 2016 2015 2014 2013
Premium revenue:         
Life$2,306,547
 $2,189,333
 $2,073,065
 $1,966,300
 $1,885,332
Health976,373
 947,663
 925,520
 869,440
 863,818
Other15
 38
 135
 400
 532
Total3,282,935
 3,137,034
 2,998,720
 2,836,140
 2,749,682
Net investment income847,885
 806,903
 773,951
 758,286
 734,650
Realized investment gains (losses)23,611
 (10,683) (8,791) 23,548
 7,990
Total revenue4,155,573
 3,934,629
 3,766,065
 3,620,095
 3,494,253
Income from continuing operations, net of tax1,458,263
 539,590
 516,293
 528,074
 507,205
Income from discontinued operations, net of tax(3,769) 10,189
 10,807
 14,865
 21,267
Net income(1)
1,454,494
 549,779
 527,100
 542,939
 528,472
Per common share:         
Basic earnings:         
Income from continuing operations12.53
 4.50
 4.13
 4.04
 3.68
Income from discontinued operations(0.03) 0.08
 0.08
 0.11
 0.16
Net income12.50
 4.58
 4.21
 4.15
 3.84
Diluted earnings:         
Income from continuing operations12.26
 4.41
 4.07
 3.98
 3.63
Income from discontinued operations(0.04) 0.08
 0.09
 0.11
 0.16
Net income(1)
12.22
 4.49
 4.16
 4.09
 3.79
Cash dividends declared0.60
 0.56
 0.54
 0.51
 0.45
Cash dividends paid0.59
 0.56
 0.53
 0.49
 0.44
Basic weighted average shares outstanding116,343
 120,001
 125,095
 130,722
 137,647
Diluted weighted average shares outstanding118,983
 122,368
 126,757
 132,640
 139,564
          
As of December 31,2017 2016 2015 2014 2013
Cash and invested assets$17,853,047
 $15,955,891
 $14,405,073
 $15,058,996
 $13,456,944
Total assets23,474,985
 21,436,087
 19,853,213
 20,272,259
 18,217,757
Short-term debt328,067
 264,475
 490,129
 238,398
 229,070
Long-term debt1,132,201
 1,133,165
 743,733
 992,130
 990,865
Shareholders' equity(1)
6,231,421
 4,566,861
 4,055,552
 4,697,466
 3,776,342
Per diluted common share(1)
52.95
 37.76
 32.71
 36.19
 27.66
Effect of fixed maturity revaluation on diluted
equity per common share(2)
13.18
 5.63
 2.62
 8.28
 1.81
Annualized premium in force:         
Life2,373,099
 2,262,736
 2,150,498
 2,044,545
 1,955,401
Health1,018,020
 998,634
 973,042
 947,323
 887,444
Total3,391,119
 3,261,370
 3,123,540
 2,991,868
 2,842,845
Basic shares outstanding114,593
 118,031
 122,370
 127,930
 134,252
Diluted shares outstanding117,696
 120,958
 123,996
 129,812
 136,537

(1)
On December 22, 2017, the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act was enacted into law which revises corporate income tax rates from 35% to 21%, among other modifications. See further discussion of the tax reform implications in the Results of Operations. Excluding the effects of tax reform, net income, net income per diluted common share, shareholders' equity and shareholders' equity per diluted common share would have been $581 million, $4.88, $5.36 billion and $45.52, respectively.
(2)
There is accounting guidance (ASC 320-10-35-1, Investments- Debt and Equity Securities) requiring available-for-sale fixed maturities to be recorded at fair value each period. The effect of this rule on diluted equity per share reflects the amount added or (deducted) under this rule to produce GAAP Shareholders’ equity per share. See discussion under the caption Capital Resources in Management’s Discussion and Analysis in this report concerning the effect this rule has on Torchmark’s equity.

15
TMK 2017 FORM 10-K

Table of Contents

Throughout the remainder

Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of this discussion, share purchases refer only to those made from excess cash flow at the Parent CompanyFinancial Condition and borrowings.Results of Operations
 
A discussion of each of Torchmark’s segments follows. The following discussions are presenteddiscussion should be read in conjunction with the manner weSelected Financial Data and Torchmark’s Consolidated Financial Statements and Notes thereto appearing elsewhere in this report.
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
How Torchmark Views Its Operations: Torchmark is the holding company for a group of insurance companies which market primarily individual life, and supplemental health insurance to middle income households throughout the United States. We view our operations by segments, which are the insurance product lines of life, health, and annuities, and the investment segment that supports the product lines. Segments are aligned based on their common characteristics, comparability of the profit margins, and management techniques used to operate each segment.
Insurance Product Line Segments. As fully explained in Note 14—Business Segments, the insurance product line segments involve the marketing, underwriting, and the administration of policies. Each product line is further segmented by the various distribution units that market the insurance policies. Each distribution unit operates in a niche market offering insurance products designed for that particular market. Whether analyzing profitability of a segment as describeda whole, or the individual distribution units within the segment, the measure of profitability used by management is the underwriting margin, which is:
Premium revenue
Less:
Policy obligations
Policy acquisition costs and commissions
Investment Segment. The investment segment involves the management of our capital resources, including investments and the management of corporate debt and liquidity. Our measure of profitability for the investment segment is excess investment income, which is:
Net investment income
Less:
Required interest on net policy liabilities
Financing costs

The tables in Note 14—Business Segments in theNotes to the Consolidated Financial Statementsreconcile Torchmark’s revenues and expenses by segment to its major income statement line items for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2017.

16
TMK 2017 FORM 10-K

Table of Contents



Current Year Highlights:

Net income as a return on equity (ROE) was 28.2%(1) and net operating income as a ROE, excluding net unrealized gains on the fixed maturity portfolio was 14.3%(1).

Total premium increased by 5% over the prior year. Life premium also increased by 5% for the year from $2.2 billion to $2.3 billion. Life underwriting margin also increased 5% from $574 million in 2016 to $604 million in 2017.

Net investment income increased 5% over the prior year. In addition, excess investment income, a measure used by management as explained below, increased by 7% over the prior year.

During 2017, the Company repurchased 4.1 million shares at a total cost of $325 million for an average share price of $78.67.

The following represents net income and net operating income from continuing operations for the 3 years ended December 31, 2017.

(1)As further discussed below regarding Tax Legislation, excluding the tax reform adjustment, net income as a ROE and net operating income as a ROE would have been 11.7% and 14.4%, respectively. In 2017, the Company recorded a one-time adjustment of $874 million impacting net income. As the impact of the Tax Legislation was treated as a non-operating event, it was excluded from net operating income.

Net income as a ROE and net operating income as a ROE, excluding net unrealized gains on the fixed maturity portfolioin 2016 were 12.0% and 14.6%, respectively and 11.9% and 14.5%, respectively in 2015. Net operating income as a ROE, excluding net unrealized gains on the fixed maturity portfolio is considered a non-GAAP measure. Management utilizes this measure to view the business without the effect of the unrealized gains or losses which are primarily attributable to fluctuation in interest rates on the available-for-sale portfolio.

Summary of Operations: Net income was $1.5 billion in 2017, compared with $550 million in 2016. This sharp increase was due to an $874 million increase to net income, primarily relating to a reduction of deferred income tax liabilities resulting from enactment of the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2017 (Tax Legislation). See further discussion below. Net income also increased in 2016 from $527 million in 2015. On a diluted per common share basis, 2017 net income rose

17
TMK 2017 FORM 10-K

Table of Contents



172% to $12.22 after an 8% increase in 2016, again largely related to implementation of the Tax Legislation. Without the impact of the Tax Legislation, net income per diluted common share would have been $4.88. Net income per diluted common share in 2016 rose to $4.49 from $4.16 in 2015. The per share results have exceeded the growth in dollar amounts due to our share repurchase program. Each year’s per share net income was affected by realized investment gains (losses), which were $0.15, $(0.06), and $(0.05), in 2017, 2016 and 2015, respectively. More information concerning realized investment gains and losses can be found under the caption Realized Gains and Losses in this report.

Net operating income from continuing operations rose each year over the prior year from $523 million in 2015 to $549 million in 2016 to $574 million in 2017. Net operating income is the consolidated total of segment profits after tax and as such is considered a non-GAAP measure. Net income is the most directly comparable GAAP measure. See Note 14—Business Segmentsfor a discussion of the usefulness and purpose of this measure. We do not consider realized gains and losses to be a component of our core insurance operations or operating segments. Additionally, net income was affected by certain significant and unusual non-operating items in each of the years 2015 through 2017. We do not view these items as components of core operating results because they are not indicative of past performance or future prospects of the insurance operations. We remove items such as these that relate to prior periods or are non-operating items when evaluating the results of current operations, and therefore exclude such matters from our segment analysis for current periods.

Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2017: On December 22, 2017, the Tax Legislation was enacted which changed existing tax law, including a reduction of the corporate income tax rate from 35% to 21% effective January 1, 2018. The Company recorded $877 million of tax benefits in net income as a result of re-measuring its deferred tax liabilities using the lower corporate tax rate as of the date of enactment. Based on the analysis of the Tax Legislation, the Company was able to determine that this amount is a reasonable estimate of the impact of the Tax Legislation in accordance with SEC Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 118. However, the Company will continue to analyze relevant information to complete the accounting for income taxes which may result in an adjustment to income tax expense in 2018. The accounting is expected to be complete when the 2017 U.S. corporate income tax returns are filed later in 2018. In addition, the Company early adopted ASU 2018-02, Income Statement—Reporting Comprehensive Income (Topic 220): Reclassification of Certain Tax Effects from Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income, and recorded a $252 million reclassification from Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income to Retained Earnings to eliminate the stranded tax effects associated with the tax rate change, primarily relating to the unrealized gains and losses on the available-for-sale fixed maturity portfolio. More information concerning income taxes is provided in Note 8—Income Taxes.

IndexThere will be substantial long-term benefits from the Tax Legislation due to Financial Statementsthe taxation of future profits at the new 21% tax rate. Looking forward, we are anticipating the effective tax rate on our net operating income before stock compensation expense to decrease and be in the range of 19% to 20%. Despite the lower expected tax rate for financial reporting purposes, in the short and intermediate term, we do not anticipate a significant reduction in our current tax expense, as benefits of the lower tax rate will be virtually offset by several provisions included in the Tax Legislation that increase the Company's current taxable income.

The below table illustrates the impact of the tax reform adjustment on certain balances.
 Prior to tax adjustment Tax reform adjustment GAAP balance
Current and deferred income taxes payable$2,189,402
 $(877,400) $1,312,002
Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss)1,171,874
 252,400
 1,424,274
Retained earnings4,181,208
 625,000
 4,806,208
Shareholders' equity5,357,443
 873,978
 6,231,421
Income before income taxes834,028
 (3,380) 830,648
Income tax benefit (expense)(249,743) 877,358
 627,615
Net income580,516
 873,978
 1,454,494
Total diluted net income per common share$4.88
 $7.34
 $12.22



18
TMK 2017 FORM 10-K

Table of Contents



Life Insurance
Life insurance is our largest insurance segment, with 2016 life premium representing 70% of total premium. Life underwriting income before other income and administrative expense represented 72% ofTorchmark’s operations on a segment-by-segment basis are discussed in depth under the totalappropriate captions following in 2016. Additionally, investments supporting the reserves for life products produce the majority of excess investment income attributable to the investment segment.
We use three statistical measures as indicators of premium growth and sales over the near term: “annualized premium in force,” “net sales,” and “first-year collected premium.” Annualized premium in force is defined as the premium income that would be received over the following twelve months at any given date on all active policies if those policies remain in force throughout the twelve-month period. Annualized premium in force is an indicator of potential growth in premium revenue. Net sales is annualized premium issued, net of cancellations in the first thirty days after issue, except in the case of Globe Life Direct Response where net sales is annualized premium issued at the time the first full premium is paid after any introductory offer period has expired. We believe that net sales is a better indicator of the rate of premium growth as compared to annualized premium issued. First-year collected premium is defined as the premium collected during the reporting period for all policies in their first policy year. First-year collected premium takes lapses into account in the first year when lapses are more likely to occur, and thus is a useful indicator of how much new premium is expected to be added to premium income in the future.this report.

Life insurance premium rose 6% to $2.2 billion in 2016 after having increased 5% in 2015 to $2.1 billion. Life insurance products are marketed through several distribution channels. Premium incomeAnalysis of Profitability by channel for each of the last three years is as follows:
LIFE INSURANCE
Premium by Distribution MethodSegment
(Dollar amounts in thousands)
 2016 2015 2014
 Amount 
% of
Total
 Amount 
% of
Total
 Amount 
% of
Total
American Income Exclusive Agency$913,355
 42 $830,903
 40 $766,458
 39
Globe Life Direct Response782,765
 36 746,693
 36 702,023
 36
Liberty National Exclusive Agency270,476
 12 271,113
 13 272,265
 14
Other Agencies222,737
 10 224,356
 11 225,554
 11
 $2,189,333
 100 $2,073,065
 100 $1,966,300
 100
 2017 2016 2015 2017
Change
 % 2016
Change
 %
Life insurance underwriting margin$604,337
 $573,762
 $569,402
 $30,575
 5
 $4,360
 1
Health insurance underwriting margin219,508
 210,056
 204,377
 9,452
 4
 5,679
 3
Annuity underwriting margin10,562
 9,394
 4,568
 1,168
 12
 4,826
 106
Excess investment income239,363
 224,031
 219,504
 15,332
 7
 4,527
 2
Other insurance:      
   
  
Other income1,270
 1,534
 2,379
 (264) (17) (845) (36)
Administrative expense(210,590) (196,598) (186,191) (13,992) 7
 (10,407) 6
Corporate and other(43,285) (34,913) (37,667) (8,372) 24
 2,754
 (7)
Pre-tax total821,165
 787,266
 776,372
 33,899
 4
 10,894
 1
Applicable taxes(247,484) (237,906) (253,459) (9,578) 4
 15,553
 (6)
Net operating income from continuing operations573,681
 549,360
 522,913
 24,321
 4
 26,447
 5
Discontinued operations—Part D, net of tax
 9,033
 10,807
 (9,033) (100) (1,774) (16)
Net operating income573,681
 558,393
 533,720
 15,288
 3
 24,673
 5
Reconciling items, net of tax:             
Realized gains (losses)—investments17,590
 (6,944) (5,714) 24,534
   (1,230)  
Part D adjustments—discontinued operations(3,769) 1,156
 
 (4,925)   1,156
  
Guaranty fund assessments(1,171) 
 
 (1,171)   
  
Administrative settlements(5,628) (2,467) (906) (3,161)   (1,561)  
Non-operating fees(187) (359) 
 172
   (359)  
Tax reform adjustment873,978
 
 
 873,978
   
  
Net income$1,454,494
 $549,779
 $527,100
 $904,715
 165
 $22,679
 4

The life insurance segment is our strongest segment and is the largest contributor to earnings in each year presented. This segment contributed $31 million in 2017 and $4 million in 2016 to the growth in our underwriting margin. Also contributing to growth in income in both years was our health insurance segment, which provided $9 million of additional margin in 2017 and $6 million in 2016.
 
Annualized life premium in force was $2.26 billionExcess investment income, the measure of profitability of our investment segment, increased 7% to $239 million from the prior year amount of $224 million. In 2016, excess investment income increased 2%. Investment yields continue to be pressured by investing at December 31, 2016, an increase of 5.2% over $2.15 billion a year earlier. Annualized life premium in force was $2.04 billion at December 31, 2014.yields lower than the yield on dispositions and the average yield on the portfolio.
 
The following table shows net sales information forTotal revenues rose 6% in 2017 to $4.2 billion, or $221 million over the prior year total of $3.9 billion. Life premium rose 5% or $117 million in 2017 to $2.3 billion. Life premium increased $116 million in 2016 to $2.2 billion. Net investment income rose $41 million or 5% in 2017, and rose 4% or $33 million in 2016. Health premium increased 3% to $976 million in 2017 and contributed $29 million to 2017 revenue growth, after having gained 2% to $948 million in 2016. Health premium contributed $22 million to 2016 revenue growth.
Life insurance premium and underwriting margins have grown in each of the last three years ended December 31, 2017. The increase in life premium was driven by distribution method.sales growth and improvements in persistency. While premium and underwriting margins grew, margin as a percent of premium remained flat in 2017 at 26%, after decreasing from 27% to 26% from 2015 to 2016. Net life sales increased in 2017 to $416 million. Net life sales were flat between 2015 and 2016. The life insurance segment is discussed further in this report under the caption Life Insurance.
 
LIFE INSURANCEHealth insurance premium income increased 3% to $976 million in 2017. Health net sales rose 9% to $158 million during 2017 due to both individual and group sales. Group sales vary significantly from period to period due to the
Net Sales by Distribution Method
(Dollar amounts in thousands)
19
TMK 2017 FORM 10-K

 2016 2015 2014
 Amount 
% of
Total
 Amount 
% of
Total
 Amount 
% of
Total
American Income Exclusive Agency$209,856
 51 $198,046
 48 $172,271
 45
Globe Life Direct Response150,267
 36 164,348
 40 158,089
 42
Liberty National Exclusive Agency40,159
 10 35,782
 9 34,402
 9
Other Agencies11,673
 3 13,705
 3 13,492
 4
 $411,955
 100 $411,881
 100 $378,254
 100



The table below discloses first-yearimpact of large groups that are sold from time-to-time. First-year collected lifehealth premium by distribution channel.
LIFE INSURANCE
First-Year Collected Premium by Distribution Method
(Dollar amounts in thousands)
 2016 2015 2014
 Amount 
% of
Total
 Amount 
% of
Total
 Amount 
% of
Total
American Income Exclusive Agency$173,573
 56 $156,206
 52 $134,202
 50
Globe Life Direct Response98,496
 31 106,417
 35 100,287
 37
Liberty National Exclusive Agency29,103
 9 27,554
 9 25,777
 9
Other Agencies11,458
 4 12,036
 4 10,473
 4
 $312,630
 100 $302,213
 100 $270,739
 100
The American Income Exclusive Agency has historically marketed primarilyfell 3% to members of labor unions. While labor unions are still the core market for this agency, American Income has diversified in recent years by focusing heavily on other affinity groups and referrals to help ensure sustainable growth. This agency is Torchmark’s largest contributor to life premium of any distribution channel at 42% of Torchmark’s 2016 total. This group produced premium income of $913$136 million an increase of 10% overfrom the prior year total of $831$140 million after having risen 8%as a result of higher net sales in 2015. First-yearMedicare Supplement in the fourth quarter of 2015 that positively affected the 2016 first-year collected premium. Health margins as a percentage of premium was $174were flat at 22%, with underwriting income increasing to $220 million comparedfor 2017 due to $156 million in 2015, an increase of 11%. First-year collected premium rose 16% in 2015. Net sales increased 6% to $210 million in 2016 over the 2015 total of $198 million. Net sales increased 15% in 2015 over the 2014 total of $172 million. Sales growth in our captive agencies is generally dependent on growth in the size of the agency force. The American Income Agency's average agent count rose 2% to 6,671 for the year ended December 31, 2016 compared with 6,529 for the same period in 2015. The average producing agent count is based on the actual count at the end of each week during the period. The American Income Exclusive Agency has been focusing on growing and strengthening middle management to support sustainable growth of the agency force. To accomplish this, the agency has placed an increased emphasis on agent training programs and financial incentives that appropriately reward agents at all levels for helping develop and train its agents, including more home-office and webinar training programs. These programs are designed to provide each agent, from new recruits to top level managers, coaching and instruction specifically designed for their level of experience and responsibility. We are also making considerable investments in information technology in support of the agency, including the launching of a lead mapping and management tool to the agency force in 2017. We anticipate this tool will enhance overall productivity of agents and improve agent retention.
The Globe Life Direct Response unit offers adult and juvenile life insurance through a variety of direct-to-consumer marketing approaches, which include direct mailings, insert media, and electronic media. These different approaches support and complement one another in the unit’s efforts to reach the consumer. The Globe Life Direct Response channel’s growth has been fueled by constant innovation. In recent years, electronic media production has grown rapidly as management has aggressively increased marketing activities related to internet and mobile technology, and has focused on driving traffic to the inbound call center. We continually introduce new initiatives in this unit in an attempt to increase response rates.
While the juvenile market is an important source of sales, it also is a vehicle to reach the parents and grandparents of juvenile policyholders, who are more likely to respond favorably to a Globe Life Direct Response solicitation for life coverage on themselves than is the general adult population. Also, both juvenile policyholders and their parents are low acquisition-cost targets for sales of additional coverage over time.
Globe Life Direct Response’s life premium income. Underwriting income rose 5% to $783 million, representing 36% of Torchmark’s total life premium during 2016. Life premium in this channel increased 6% in 2015 to $747 million over the 2014 total of $702 million. Net sales of $150 million for this group decreased 9% from $164 million in 2015, after a 4% increase in 2015. The sales decline was expected as we have shifted our marketing efforts away from certain segments that no longer meet our profit objectives. First-year collected premium decreased 7% to $98 million in 2016 after having risen 6% in 2015.


The Liberty National Exclusive Agency markets individual and group life insurance to middle-income customers. Life premium income for this agency was $270 million in 2016, a slight decline from $271 million in 2015. Life premium income in 2014 totaled $272 million. Net sales increased 12% during 2016 to $40 million over the 2015 total of $36 million. Net sales in 2015 increased 4%. The increase in net sales during 2015 marked the first increase in several years, reflecting changes in structure of the agency that management has put in place in recent years. First-year collected premium increased 6% to $29 million during 2016 and increased 7% in 2015 to $28 million.
The Liberty average producing agent count increased 12% to 1,715 for the year ended December 31, 2016 compared with 1,535 for the same period in 2015. We continue to execute our long term plan to grow this agency through expansion from small-town markets in the southeast to more densely populated areas with larger pools of potential agent recruits and customers. Expansion of this agency’s presence into more heavily populated, less-penetrated areas will help create long term agency growth. Additionally, the agency's prospecting training program has helped to improve the ability of agents to develop new work site marketing business.
The Other Agencies distribution channels offering life insurance include the Military Agency, the UA Independent Agency (which predominantly writes health insurance), and various smaller distribution channels. The Other Agencies contributed $223 million of life premium income, or 10% of Torchmark’s total in 2016, but contributed only 3% of net sales for the year.
LIFE INSURANCE
Summary of Results
(Dollar amounts in thousands)
 2016 2015 2014
 Amount 
% of
Premium
 Amount 
% of
Premium
 Amount 
% of
Premium
Premium and policy charges$2,189,333
 100
 $2,073,065
 100
 $1,966,300
 100
            
Policy obligations1,475,477
 67
 1,374,608
 67
 1,293,384
 66
Required interest on reserves(577,827) (26) (552,298) (27) (530,192) (27)
Net policy obligations897,650
 41
 822,310
 40
 763,192
 39
Commissions, premium taxes, and non-deferred acquisition expenses164,476
 8
 154,811
 8
 143,174
 7
Amortization of acquisition costs553,445
 25
 526,542
 25
 503,445
 26
Total expense1,615,571
 74
 1,503,663
 73
 1,409,811
 72
Insurance underwriting margin before other income and administrative expenses$573,762
 26
 $569,402
 27
 $556,489
 28
Life insurance underwriting income before insurance administrative expense was $574$210 million in 2016 compared with $569$204 million in 2015 and $556 million in 2014. As a percentage of premium, underwriting margins declined to 26% in 2016 from 27% in 2015. The decreasehealth insurance segment is discussed further in underwriting marginthis report under the caption Health Insurance.

We do not currently market annuities. See the caption Annuities for discussion of the Annuity segment.
Excess investment income, is based on three major components: net investment income, required interest on net policy liabilities (interest applicable to insurance products), and financing costs. In 2017, net investment income rose 5%, compared with 4% in 2016. At the same time, our investment portfolio grew 6% in 2017 and 2016, on an amortized cost basis. In recent years, the percentage growth in net investment income has been less than the growth in the overall investment portfolio due primarily to new investments being made at yield rates lower than the yield rates on dispositions and the average yield on the portfolio. The growth rate of net investment income is impacted at times by a lag between the time when proceeds from maturities and dispositions are received and when the proceeds are reinvested, during which the funds are held in cash. In addition, Torchmark’s share repurchase program (described later under this caption) has diverted cash that could have otherwise been used to acquire investments and increase net investment income. The growth in the investment portfolio has been augmented in 2017 and 2016 due to the receipt of certain receivables that had accumulated under our Medicare Part D business.
The interest required on net policy liabilities is deducted from net investment income, and generally grows in conjunction with the net policy liabilities that are supported by the invested assets. The lower new-money yields resulting from the low interest rate environment noted above have compressed excess investment income as required interest has continued to grow at approximately the same rate that net policy liabilities have grown. Financing costs, which consist of the interest required for debt service on our long and short-term debt, are also deducted from net investment income. Financing costs in 2017 increased 1% to $85 million from $83 million in 2016. The additional interest expense resulted primarily from an increase in the cost of our short-term borrowings and, in lesser part, from the issuance of our new 5.275% Junior Subordinated Debt security thirty-six days before the repayment of our 5.875% Junior Subordinated Debt security.
Insurance administrative expenses were up 7.1% in 2017 when compared with the prior year period, and increased to 6.4% as a percentage of premium from 6.3% in 2016 and 2015 was due to higher Globe Life Direct Response net policy obligations. The higher than anticipated net policy obligations6.2% in the Globe Life Direct Response Unit primarily relate to policies issued in calendar years 2011 through 2015. The increase in administrative expenses is primarily attributeddue to an increase in other employee costs and investments in information technology. Corporate and Other expenses were up primarily due to an increase in stock-based compensation expense, reflecting Torchmark's higher share price as compared with the same period a spikeyear ago, and recognition of a one-time increase in claims in certain blocks of policies as well as policies where additional prescription drug information was used instock-based compensation expense due to the underwriting process with an expectation of improved mortality. To date, improvements in actual mortality have been less than expected, causing higher than expected net policy obligations.Tax Legislation.



20
TMK 2017 FORM 10-K

Index to Financial Statements
Table of Contents



Health Insurance
Torchmark offers Medicare Supplement and limited-benefit supplemental health insurance products that include primarily critical illness and accident plans. These policies are designed to supplement health coverage that applicants already own. Medicare Supplements are offered to enrollees in the traditional fee-for-service Medicare program. Medicare Supplement plans are standardized by federal regulation and are designed to pay deductibles and co-payments not paid by Medicare.

On July 1, 2016, Torchmark sold its Medicare Part D business to an unaffiliated third party. Torchmark decided to exit its Medicare Part D business due to increasing risks, declining margins, higher drug costs, and increased administrative and compliance costs. Management believes this sale allows the Company to better focus on its core protection life and health insurance businesses. As the historical results for the Medicare Part D business are accounted for as discontinued operations, all business results and relevant forward looking statements of the Company are reported as continuing operations, excluding the Medicare Part D business.  For further discussion of the disposition of the Medicare Part D business, see Note 6—Discontinued Operations.


2
TMK 2017 FORM 10-K

Table of Contents



The following table presents supplemental health annualized premium in force information for the three years ended December 31, 2017 by product category.
 
Annualized Premium in Force
(Dollar amounts in thousands)
 2017 2016 2015
 Amount % of
Total
 Amount % of
Total
 Amount   % of
Total
Medicare Supplement$495,982
 49 $502,691
 51 $498,696
 51
Limited-benefit plans522,038
 51 495,943
 49 474,346
 49

$1,018,020
 100 $998,634
 100 $973,042
 100
The following table presents supplemental health annualized premium in force for the three years ended December 31, 2017 by distribution method.
 
Annualized Premium in Force
(Dollar amounts in thousands)
 2017 2016 2015
Direct Response$76,672
 $74,261
 $72,423
Exclusive agents:     
Liberty National205,136
 210,260
 216,139
American Income84,775
 78,947
 74,058
Family Heritage268,584
 249,857
 234,120
Independent agents:     
United American382,853
 385,309
 376,302
 $1,018,020
 $998,634
 $973,042
Annuities
Annuity products include single-premium and flexible-premium deferred annuities. Annuities in each of the three years ended December 31, 2017 comprised less than 1% of premium.
Pricing
Premium rates for life and health insurance products are established using assumptions as to future mortality, morbidity, persistency, investment income, expenses, and target profit margins. These assumptions are based on Company experience and projected investment earnings. Revenues for individual life and health insurance products are primarily derived from premium income, and, to a lesser extent, through policy charges to the policyholder account values on annuity products and certain individual life products. Profitability is affected to the extent actual experience deviates from the assumptions made in pricing and to the extent investment income varies from that required for policy reserves.
Collections for annuity products and certain life products are not recognized as revenues, but are added to policyholder account values. Revenues from these products are derived from charges to the account balances for insurance risk and administrative costs. Profits are earned to the extent these revenues exceed actual costs. Profits are also earned from investment income in excess of the amounts credited to policyholder accounts.

Underwriting
The underwriting standards of each Torchmark insurance subsidiary are established by management. Each subsidiary uses information from the application and, in some cases, telephone interviews with applicants, inspection reports, pharmacy data, doctors’ statements and/or medical examinations to determine whether a policy should be issued in accordance with the application, with a different rating, with a rider, with reduced coverage or rejected.

3
TMK 2017 FORM 10-K

Table of Contents



Reserves
The life insurance policy reserves reflected in Torchmark’s financial statements as future policy benefits are calculated based on accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (GAAP). These reserves, with premiums to be received in the future and the interest thereon compounded annually at assumed rates, must be sufficient to cover policy and contract obligations as they mature. Generally, the mortality and persistency assumptions used in the calculations of reserves are based on Company experience. Similar reserves are held on most of the health policies written by Torchmark’s insurance subsidiaries, since these policies generally are issued on a guaranteed-renewable basis. The assumptions used in the calculation of Torchmark’s reserves are reported in Note 1—Significant Accounting Policies. Reserves for annuity products and certain life products consist of the policyholders’ account values and are increased by policyholder deposits and interest credited and are decreased by policy charges and benefit payments.
Investments
The nature, quality, and percentage mix of insurance company investments are regulated by state laws. The investments of Torchmark insurance subsidiaries consist predominantly of high-quality, investment-grade securities. Approximately 96% of our invested assets at fair value are fixed maturities at December 31, 2017. (SeeNote 4—Investments and Management’s Discussion and Analysis.)
Competition
Torchmark competes with other insurance carriers through policyholder service, price, product design, and sales efforts. While there are insurance companies competing with Torchmark, no individual company dominates any of Torchmark’s life or health markets.
Torchmark’s health insurance products compete with, in addition to the products of other health insurance carriers, health maintenance organizations, preferred provider organizations, and other health care-related institutions which provide medical benefits based on contractual agreements.
Management believes Torchmark companies operate at lower policy acquisition and administrative expense levels than peer companies. This allows Torchmark to have competitive rates while maintaining higher underwriting margins.
Regulation
Insurance. Insurance companies are subject to regulation and supervision in the states in which they do business. The laws of the various states establish agencies with broad administrative and supervisory powers which include, among other things, granting and revoking licenses to transact business, regulating trade practices, licensing agents, approving policy forms, approving certain premium rates, setting minimum reserve and loss ratio requirements, determining the form and content of required financial statements, and prescribing the type and amount of investments permitted. They are also required to file detailed annual reports with supervisory agencies, and records of their business are subject to examination at any time. Under the rules of the National Association of Insurance Commissioners (NAIC), insurance companies are examined periodically by one or more of the supervisory agencies.

Risk Based Capital. The NAIC requires that a risk based capital formula be applied to all life and health insurers. The risk based capital formula is a threshold formula rather than a target capital formula. It is designed only to identify companies that require regulatory attention and is not to be used to rate or rank companies that are adequately capitalized. All Torchmark insurance subsidiaries are more than adequately capitalized under the risk based capital formula.
Guaranty Assessments. State guaranty laws provide for assessments from insurance companies to be placed into a fund which is used, in the event of failure or insolvency of an insurance company, to fulfill the obligations of that company to its policyholders. The amount which a company is assessed is based on its proportional share of the premium in each state. A significant portion of assessments are recoverable as offsets against state premium taxes. (See Note 15—Commitments and Contingenciesfor current assessment.)
Holding Company. States have enacted legislation requiring registration and periodic reporting by insurance companies domiciled within their respective jurisdictions that control or are controlled by other corporations so as to

4
TMK 2017 FORM 10-K

Table of Contents



constitute a holding company system. Torchmark and its subsidiaries have registered as a holding company system pursuant to such legislation in Indiana, Nebraska, Ohio, and New York.

Insurance holding company system statutes and regulations impose various limitations on investments in subsidiaries, and may require prior regulatory approval for material transactions between insurers and affiliates and for the payment of certain dividends and other distributions.
Personnel
At the end of 2017, Torchmark had 3,102 employees.

5
TMK 2017 FORM 10-K

Table of Contents



Item 1A. Risk Factors
Risks Related to Our Business
Product Marketplace and Operational Risks:
The insurance industry is a regulated industry, populated by many public and private companies. We operate in the life and health insurance sectors of the industry, each of which has its own set of risks.
The development and maintenance of our various distribution systems are critical to growth in product sales and profits. Development and retention of producing agents are critical to support sales growth in this market because our insurance sales are primarily made to individuals rather than groups and the face amounts of the life insurance policies sold are typically lower than those of policies sold in higher-income markets. Compensation that is competitive with other career opportunities and motivates producing agents to increase sales is also critical. In Globe Life Direct Response, continuous development of new methods of reaching the consumer and cost efficiency are key. Less than optimum execution of these strategies may result in reduced sales and profits.
Economic conditions may materially adversely affect our business and results of operations. We primarily serve the middle-income market for individual protection life and health insurance and, as a result, we compete directly with alternative uses of a customer’s disposable income. If disposable income within this demographic group declines or the use of disposable income becomes more limited as a result of a significant, sustained economic downturn or otherwise, then new sales of our insurance products could become more challenging, and our policyholders may choose to defer or stop payment of insurance premiums altogether. Economic conditions could also impact our investment portfolio as discussed under Investment Risks below.
Variations in expected-to-actual rates of mortality, morbidity and persistency could materially negatively affect our results of operations and financial condition. We establish policy reserves to pay future policyholder benefits and claims. These reserves do not represent an exact calculation of liability, but rather are actuarial estimates based on models that include many assumptions and projections which are inherently uncertain. The reserve computations involve the exercise of significant judgment with respect to levels of mortality, morbidity and persistency, as well as the timing of premium and benefit payments. Even though our actuaries continually test expected-to-actual results, actual levels that occur may differ significantly from the levels assumed when premium rates were first set. Accordingly, we cannot determine with precision the ultimate amounts of claims or benefits that we will pay or the timing of such payments. Significant adverse variations from the levels assumed when policy reserves are first set could result in increased policy obligations and negatively affect our profit margins and income.
A ratings downgrade or other negative action by a rating agency could materially affect our business, financial condition and results of operations. Various rating agencies review the financial performance and condition of insurers, including our insurance subsidiaries, and publish their financial strength ratings as indicators of an insurer’s ability to meet policyholder and contract holder obligations. These ratings are important to maintaining public confidence in our insurance products. A downgrade or other negative action by a rating agency with respect to the financial strength ratings of our insurance subsidiaries could negatively affect us in many ways, including: limiting or restricting the ability of our insurance subsidiaries to pay dividends to us and adversely affecting our ability to sell insurance products through our independent agencies.
Rating agencies also publish credit ratings for us. Credit ratings are indicators of a debt issuer’s ability to meet the terms of debt obligations in a timely manner. These ratings are important to our overall ability to access certain types of capital. Actual or anticipated downgrades in our credit ratings, or an announcement that our ratings are under further review for a downgrade, could potentially have a negative effect on our financial condition and results of operations by limiting our access to capital markets, increasing the cost of debt, or impairing our ability to raise capital to refinance maturing debt obligations, thereby potentially limiting our capacity to support growth at our insurance subsidiaries or making it more difficult to maintain or improve the current financial strength ratings of our insurance subsidiaries.

Ratings reflect only the rating agency’s views and are not recommendations to buy, sell or hold our securities. Rating agencies assign ratings based upon several factors. While most of the factors relate to the rated company, some of the factors relate to the views of the rating agency, general economic conditions and circumstances outside the rated company’s control. In addition, rating agencies use various models and formulas to assess the strength of a rated company, and from time to time rating agencies have, in their discretion, altered the models. Changes to the models

6
TMK 2017 FORM 10-K

Table of Contents



could impact the rating agencies’ judgment of the rating to be assigned to the rated company. There can be no assurance that our current credit ratings will remain in effect for any given period of time or that such ratings will not be lowered, suspended or withdrawn entirely by the rating agencies. We cannot predict what actions the rating agencies may take, or what actions we may take in response to the actions of the rating agencies which could negatively affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.
Life Insurance Marketplace Risk:

Our life products are sold in selected niche markets. We are at risk should any of these markets diminish. We have several life distribution channels that focus on distinct market niches, two of which are labor unions and sales via Globe Life Direct Response solicitation. Deterioration of our relationships with organized labor or adverse changes in the public’s receptivity to direct response marketing initiatives could negatively affect our life insurance business.
Health Insurance Marketplace Risks:

The health insurance market is subject to substantial regulatory scrutiny. Regulatory changes could impact our Medicare Supplement and other supplemental health businesses. The nature and timing of any such changes cannot be predicted and could have a material adverse effect on our health insurance business.
Competition in the health insurance market can be significant. Sales of our health insurance products are subject to competition from other health insurance companies and alternative healthcare providers, such as those that provide alternatives to traditional Medicare to seniors. In addition, some insurers may be willing to significantly reduce their profit margins or under price new sales in order to gain market share. We choose not to compete for market share based on these terms. Accordingly, changes in the competitive landscape, including the pricing strategies employed by our competitors, could negatively impact the future sales of our health insurance products.
Obtaining timely and appropriate premium rate increases for certain health insurance policies is critical. A significant percentage of the health insurance premiums that our insurance subsidiaries earn is from Medicare Supplement insurance. Medicare Supplement insurance, including conditions under which the premiums for such policies may be increased, is highly regulated at both the state and federal level. As a result, it is characterized by lower profit margins than life insurance and requires strict administrative discipline and economies of scale for success. Because Medicare Supplement policies are coordinated with the federal Medicare program, which experiences health care inflation every year, annual premium rate increases for the Medicare Supplement policies are typically necessary. Obtaining timely rate increases is of critical importance to our success in this market. Accordingly, the inability of our insurance subsidiaries to obtain approval of premium rate increases in a timely manner from state insurance regulatory authorities in the future could adversely impact their profitability and thus our business, financial condition and results of operations.

Information Security and Technology Risks:
The failure to maintain effective and efficient information systems at the Company could compromise secure data thereby adversely affecting our financial condition and results of operations. Our business operations are highly dependent upon information technology systems to provide efficient and resilient business operations. Malicious actors, employee errors or disasters affecting these information systems could impair our business operations, regulatory compliance and financial condition. To the extent our information systems may be breached by malicious actors, employee malfeasance or technological attacks, an attacker could circumvent security measures in order to access, alter or delete customer or proprietary information from our systems or to render our systems unavailable for business use. Additionally, we may not become aware of sophisticated cyber attacks for some time after they occur, thereby increasing the Company's exposure. We may have to incur significant costs to address or remediate interruptions, threats and vulnerabilities in our information and technology systems and to comply with existing and future regulatory requirements related thereto. These risks are heightened as the frequency and sophistication of cyber-attacks increase.

Employee errors in the handling of our information or technology systems may inadvertently result in unauthorized access to customer or proprietary information, or an inability to use our information technology systems to efficiently support business operations.


7
TMK 2017 FORM 10-K

Table of Contents



Additionally, we anticipate more frequent and sophisticated cyber-attacks along with more impactful regulatory oversight models. In addition, an increasing number of states require that customers be notified of unauthorized access, use or disclosure of their confidential information. Any such breach of confidential information could damage our reputation in the marketplace, deter potential customers from purchasing our products, result in the loss of existing customers, subject us to significant civil and criminal liability, or require us to incur significant technical, legal or other expenses.

In the event of a disaster, such as a natural catastrophe, an industrial accident, a blackout, or a terrorist attack or war, our computer systems may be inaccessible to our employees, agents or customers for a period of time. A disaster or natural catastrophe, an industrial accident, terrorist attack or war may make our information systems unavailable to support business operations for a period of time, which could adversely affect our financial condition and results of operations. Even if our employees are able to report to work, they may be unable to perform their duties for an extended period of time if our data or systems are disabled or destroyed and existing contingency plans cannot function as designed.

Reputational Risk:
Damage to the reputation of Torchmark or its subsidiaries could affect our ability to conduct business. Negative publicity through traditional media, internet, social media and other public forums could damage our reputation and adversely impact our agent recruiting efforts, the ability to market our products and the persistency of our block of inforce policies. As discussed above in Information Security and Technology Risks, the Company could be subjected to adverse publicity as a result of a significant security breach.

Investment Risks:
Our investments are subject to market and credit risks. Significant downgrades, delinquencies and defaults in our investment portfolio could potentially result in lower net investment income and increased realized and unrealized investment losses. Our invested assets are subject to the customary risks of defaults, downgrades and changes in market values. Our investment portfolio consists predominately of fixed maturity and short-term investments issued by corporations, where we are exposed to the risk that individual corporate issuers will not have the ability to make required interest or principal payments on an investment. The concentration of these investments in any particular issuer, industry, group of related industries or geographic areas increases this risk. Factors that may affect both market and credit risks include interest rate levels (consisting of both treasury rate and credit spread), financial market performance, disruptions in credit markets, general economic conditions, legislative changes, particular circumstances affecting the businesses or industries of each issuer and other factors beyond our control.

Additionally, as the majority of our investments are longer-term fixed maturities that we typically hold until maturity, significant increases in interest rates or inactive markets associated with market downturns could cause a material temporary decline in the fair value of our fixed investment portfolio, even with regard to performing assets. These declines could cause a material increase in unrealized losses in our investment portfolio. Significant unrealized losses can substantially reduce our capital position and shareholders’ equity. It is possible that our investment in certain of these securities with unrealized losses may experience a default event and that a portion or all of that unrealized loss may not be recoverable. In that case, the unrealized loss will be realized, at which point we would take an impairment charge, reducing our net income.
We cannot be assured that any particular issuer, regardless of industry, will be able to make required interest and principal payments on a timely basis or at all. Significant downgrades of issuers could negatively impact our risk-based capital ratios, leading to potential downgrades by our rating agencies, potential reduction in future dividend capacity, and/or higher financing costs at the holding company should additional statutory capital be required.
Changes in interest rates could negatively affect income. Declines in interest rates expose insurance companies to the risk that they will fail to earn the level of interest on investments assumed in pricing products and in setting discount rates used to calculate the net policy liabilities. While we attempt to manage our investments to earn an excess investment income spread, we can give no assurance that a significant and persistent decline in interest rates will not materially affect such spreads. Significant decreases in interest rates could result in calls by issuers of investments, where such features are available to issuers. These calls could result in a decline in our investment income, as reinvestment of the proceeds would likely be at lower rates.


8
TMK 2017 FORM 10-K

Table of Contents



Increases in interest rates could cause the fair value of securities within our bond portfolio to decline. A rise in interest rates could also result in certain policyholders surrendering their annuity policies for cash thereby potentially requiring our insurance subsidiaries to liquidate bonds if other sources of liquidity are not available to meet their obligations. In such a case, realized losses could result from such sales and could adversely affect our statutory income and results of operations.

Liquidity Risks:
Our ability to fund operations is substantially dependent on funds available, primarily dividends, from our insurance subsidiaries. As a holding company with no direct operations, our principal asset is the capital stock of our insurance subsidiaries, which periodically declare and distribute dividends on their capital stock. Moreover, our liquidity, including our ability to pay our operating expenses and to make principal and interest payments on debt securities or other indebtedness owed by us, as well as our ability to pay dividends on our common stock or any preferred stock, depends significantly upon the surplus and earnings of our insurance subsidiaries and the ability of these subsidiaries to pay dividends or to advance or repay funds to us. Other sources of liquidity include a variety of short-term and long-term instruments, including our credit facility, commercial paper, long-term debt, intercompany financing and reinsurance.

The principal sources of our insurance subsidiaries’ liquidity are insurance premiums, as well as investment income, maturities, repayments and other cash flow from our investment portfolio. Our insurance subsidiaries are subject to various state statutory and regulatory restrictions applicable to insurance companies that limit the amount of cash dividends, loans and advances that those subsidiaries may pay to us, including laws establishing minimum solvency and liquidity thresholds. For example, in the states where our companies are domiciled, an insurance company generally may pay dividends only out of its unassigned surplus as reflected in its statutory financial statements filed in that state. Additionally, dividends paid by insurance subsidiaries are restricted based on regulations by their states of domicile. Accordingly, impairments in assets or a disruption in our insurance subsidiaries’ operations that reduces their capital or cash flow could limit or disallow payment of dividends to us, a principal source of our cash flow.
We can give no assurance that more stringent restrictions will not be adopted from time to time by states in which our insurance subsidiaries are domiciled, which could, under certain circumstances, significantly reduce dividends or other amounts paid to us by our subsidiaries. Although we do not anticipate changes, changes in laws or regulations could constrain the ability of our subsidiaries to pay dividends or to advance or repay funds to us in sufficient amounts and at times necessary to meet our debt obligations and corporate expenses. Additionally, if our insurance subsidiaries were unable to obtain approval of our health premium rate increases in a timely manner from state insurance regulatory authorities, their profitability, and their ability to declare and distribute dividends to us could be negatively impacted. Limitations on the flow of dividends from our subsidiaries could limit our ability to service and repay debt or to pay dividends on our capital stock.

Adverse capital and credit market conditions may significantly affect our ability to meet liquidity needs or access capital, as well as affect our cost of capital. Should interest rates rise in the future, the interest rate on any new debt obligation we may issue could increase and our net income could be reduced. In addition, if the credit and capital markets were to experience significant disruption, uncertainty and instability, these conditions could adversely affect our access to capital. Such market conditions may limit our ability to replace maturing liabilities (in a timely manner or at all) and/or access the capital necessary to grow our business.
In the unlikely event that current sources of liquidity do not satisfy our needs, we may have to seek additional financing or raise capital. The availability and cost of additional financing or capital will depend on a variety of factors such as market conditions, the general availability of credit or capital, the volume of trading activities, the overall availability of credit to the insurance industry and our credit ratings and credit capacity. Additionally, customers, lenders or investors could develop a negative perception of our financial prospects if we were to incur large investment losses or if the level of our business activity were to decrease due to a market downturn. Our access to funds may also be impaired if regulatory authorities or rating agencies take negative actions against us. If our internal sources of liquidity prove to be insufficient, we may not be able to successfully obtain additional financing on favorable terms or at all. As such, we may be forced to delay raising capital, issue shorter term securities than we prefer or bear an unattractive cost of capital which could decrease our profitability and significantly reduce our financial flexibility. As a result, our results of operations, financial condition and cash flows could be materially negatively affected.


9
TMK 2017 FORM 10-K

Table of Contents



Regulatory Risks:
Our businesses are heavily regulated and changes in regulation may reduce our profitability and growth. Insurance companies, including our insurance subsidiaries, are subject to extensive supervision and regulation in the states in which they do business. The primary purpose of this supervision and regulation is the protection of our policyholders, not our investors. State agencies have broad administrative power over numerous aspects of our business, including premium rates and other terms and conditions that we can include in the insurance policies offered by our insurance subsidiaries, marketing practices, advertising, licensing of agents, policy forms, capital adequacy, solvency, reserves and permitted investments. Also, regulatory authorities have relatively broad discretion to grant, renew or initiate procedures to revoke licenses or approvals. The insurance laws, regulations and policies currently affecting Torchmark and its insurance subsidiaries may change at any time, possibly having an adverse effect on our business. Should these regulatory changes occur, we may be unable to maintain all required licenses and approvals, and our business may not fully comply with the wide variety of applicable laws and regulations or the relevant authority’s interpretation of such laws and regulations, which may change from time to time. If we do not have the requisite licenses and approvals or do not comply with applicable regulatory requirements, the insurance regulatory authorities could preclude or temporarily suspend us from carrying on some or all of our activities and/or impose substantial fines.
We cannot predict the timing or substance of any future regulatory initiatives. In recent years, there has been increased scrutiny of insurance companies, including our insurance subsidiaries, by insurance regulatory authorities, which has included more extensive examinations and more detailed review of disclosure documents. These regulatory authorities may bring regulatory or other legal actions against us if, in their view, our practices, or those of our agents or employees, are improper. Such actions could result in substantial fines, penalties and/or prohibitions or restrictions on our business activities, and could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations or financial condition. Additionally, changes in the overall legal or regulatory environment may cause us to change our views regarding the actions that we need to take from a legal or regulatory risk management perspective, thus necessitating changes to our practices that may, in some cases, limit our ability to grow, impact regulatory capital requirements, or otherwise negatively impact our profitability.
Currently, the U.S. federal government does not directly regulate the business of insurance. However, the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Record and Consumer Protection Act of 2010 established a Federal Insurance Office (FIO), charged with monitoring systemic risk exposure in the insurance industry, and a Financial Stability Oversight Council (FSOC), which serves to identify and respond to risks and emerging threats to U.S. financial systems. A Center for Consumer Information and Insurance Oversight (CCIIO), established under the Department of Health and Human Services, is charged with overseeing implementation of the Affordable Care Act (ACA). The creation of these insurance regulatory offices may indicate that the federal government intends to play a larger role in the direct oversight or regulation of the insurance industry. We cannot predict what impact, if any, the ongoing operations of the FIO, FSOC and CCIIO, as well as any other proposals or executive action for federal oversight or regulation of insurance could have on our business, results of operations or financial condition.

Changes in U.S. federal income tax law could increase our tax costs or negatively impact our insurance subsidiaries' capital. Changes to the Internal Revenue Code, administrative rulings, or court decisions affecting the insurance industry, including the products insurers offer, could increase our effective tax rate and lower our net income, adversely impact our insurance subsidiaries' capital, or limit the ability of our insurance subsidiaries to sell certain of their products.
Changes in accounting standards issued by accounting standard-setting bodies may affect our financial statements, reduce our reported profitability and change the timing of profit recognition. Our financial statements are subject to the application of GAAP and accounting practices as promulgated by the National Association of Insurance Commissioners’ statutory accounting practices (NAIC SAP), which principles are periodically revised and/or expanded. Accordingly, from time to time we are required to adopt new or revised accounting standards or guidance issued by recognized authoritative bodies. It is possible that future accounting standards that we are required to adopt could change the current accounting treatment that we apply to our consolidated financial statements and that such changes could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition and results of operations. Further, standard setters have a full agenda of unissued topics under review at any given time, many of which have the potential to negatively impact our profitability.


10
TMK 2017 FORM 10-K

Table of Contents



Non-compliance with restrictions on customer and consumer privacy and information security, including taking steps to ensure that our business associates who obtain access to sensitive customer and consumer information maintain its confidentiality, could materially adversely affect our reputation and business operations. The collection, maintenance, use, disclosure and disposal of individually identifiable data by our insurance subsidiaries are regulated at the international, federal and state levels. These laws and rules are subject to change by legislation or administrative or judicial interpretation. Various state laws address the use and disclosure of individually identifiable health data to the extent they are more restrictive than those contained in the privacy and security provisions in the federal Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act of 1999 (GLBA), the Health Information Technology for Economic and Clinical Health Act (HITECH), and in the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996 (HIPAA). HIPAA also requires that we impose privacy and security requirements on our business associates (as that term is defined in the HIPAA regulations). Noncompliance with any privacy laws or any security breach involving the misappropriation, loss or other unauthorized disclosure of sensitive or confidential information, whether by us or by one of our business associates, could have a material adverse effect on our business, reputation and results of operations and could include material fines and penalties, various forms of damages, consent orders regarding our privacy and security practices, adverse actions against our licenses to do business and injunctive relief.
Litigation Risk:
Litigation could result in substantial judgments against us or our subsidiaries. We are, and in the future may be, subject to litigation in the ordinary course of business. Some of these proceedings have been brought on behalf of various alleged classes of complainants, and, in certain of these matters, the plaintiffs are seeking large and/or indeterminate amounts, including punitive or exemplary damages. Members of our management and legal teams review litigation on a quarterly and annual basis. However, the outcome of any such litigation cannot be predicted with certainty. A number of civil jury verdicts have been returned against insurers in the jurisdictions in which our insurance subsidiaries do business involving the insurers’ sales practices, alleged agent misconduct, failure to properly supervise agents and other matters. These lawsuits have resulted in the award of substantial judgments against insurers that are disproportionate to the actual damages, including material amounts of punitive damages. In some states in which we operate, juries have substantial discretion in awarding punitive damages. This discretion creates the potential for unpredictable material adverse judgments in any given punitive damages suit.
Our pending and future litigation could adversely affect us because of the costs of defending these cases, the costs of settlement or judgments against us, or changes in our operations that could result from litigation. Substantial legal liability in these or future legal actions could also have a material adverse financial effect or cause significant harm to our reputation, which, in turn, could materially harm our business and our business prospects.

Actual or alleged misclassification of independent contractors at our insurance subsidiaries could result in adverse legal, tax or financial consequences. A significant portion of our sales agents are independent contractors. Although we believe we have properly classified such individuals, a risk nevertheless exists that a court, the IRS or other authority will take the position that those sales agents are employees. The laws and regulations that govern the status and classification of workers are subject to change and differing interpretations, which we cannot predict.
If there is an adverse determination regarding the classification of some or all of the independent contractors at our insurance subsidiaries by a court or governmental agency, we could incur significant costs with respect to payroll tax liabilities, employee benefits, wage payments, fines, judgments and/or legal settlements, any of which could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations. In addition, any resulting reclassification could necessitate significant changes in our affected insurance subsidiaries’ business models.
Catastrophic Event Risk:
Our business is subject to the risk of the occurrence of catastrophic events. Our insurance policies are issued to and held by a large number of policyholders throughout the United States in relatively low-face amounts. Accordingly, it is unlikely that a large portion of our policyholder base would be affected by a single natural disaster. However, our insurance operations could be exposed to the risk of catastrophic mortality or morbidity caused by events such as a pandemic, hurricane, earthquake, or man-made catastrophes, including acts of terrorism or war, which may produce significant claims in larger areas, especially those that are heavily populated. Claims resulting from natural or man-made catastrophic events could cause substantial volatility in our financial results for any fiscal quarter or year and could materially reduce our profitability or harm our financial condition.

11
TMK 2017 FORM 10-K

Table of Contents




Item 1B. Unresolved Staff Comments
As of December 31, 2017, Torchmark had no unresolved staff comments.
Item 2. Properties
Torchmark, through its subsidiaries, owns or leases buildings that are used in the normal course of business. Torchmark owns and occupies a 300,000 square foot facility in McKinney, Texas. This facility is Torchmark’s corporate headquarters and also houses the operations of a subsidiary, United American, as well as many operations of other subsidiaries. In addition, United American leases 5,000 square feet of space in Omaha, Nebraska and, through a subsidiary, leases 3,230 square feet of office space in Syracuse, New York.
Liberty National, also in McKinney, Texas, leases a 24,000 square foot facility in Hoover, Alabama (a Birmingham suburb). An 8,000 square foot facility is leased for storage in Pelham, Alabama.
Globe leases 34,000 square feet of office area in the Cotter Tower building located in downtown Oklahoma City, Oklahoma. Globe also leases 11,000 square feet at a nearby facility used for storage. Globe Marketing Services, a subsidiary of Globe, owns a 133,000 square foot facility in Oklahoma City which houses the Globe Life Direct Response operation.
American Income owns and occupies two buildings located in Waco, Texas: 70,000 square foot building for corporate operations and a 43,000 square foot printing facility. American Income also leases 10,800 square feet in a building across the street from the main office building. American Income also leases office space throughout the United States to support its marketing operations.
Family Heritage owns 50% of a partnership that owns a 66,000 square foot building in Broadview Heights, Ohio (a suburb of Cleveland), serving as Family Heritage’s headquarters. The partnership also leases a portion of the building to unrelated tenants.


Item 3. Legal Proceedings
Torchmark and its subsidiaries, in common with the insurance industry in general, are subject to litigation, including claims involving tax matters, alleged breaches of contract, torts, including bad faith and fraud claims based on alleged wrongful or fraudulent acts of agents of Torchmark’s subsidiaries, employment discrimination, and miscellaneous other causes of action. Based upon information presently available, and in light of legal and other factual defenses available to Torchmark and its subsidiaries, management does not believe that such litigation will have a material adverse effect on Torchmark’s financial condition, future operating results or liquidity; however, assessing the eventual outcome of litigation necessarily involves forward-looking speculation as to judgments to be made by judges, juries and appellate courts in the future. This bespeaks caution, particularly in states with reputations for high punitive damage verdicts. Torchmark’s management recognizes that large punitive damage awards bearing little or no relation to actual damages continue to be awarded by juries in jurisdictions in which Torchmark and its subsidiaries have substantial business, creating the potential for unpredictable material adverse judgments in any given punitive damage suit.
See further discussion of litigation and unclaimed property audits in Note 15—Commitments and Contingencies.


Item 4. Mine Safety Disclosures.
Not Applicable.

12
TMK 2017 FORM 10-K

Table of Contents



PART II

Item 5. Market for Registrant’s Common Equity,
Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities
Market Price of and Dividends on the Registrant’s Common Equity and Related Stockholder Matters
The principal market in which Torchmark’s common stock is traded is the New York Stock Exchange. There were 2,662 shareholders of record on December 31, 2017, excluding shareholder accounts held in nominee form. The market prices and cash dividends paid by calendar quarter for the past two years are presented in the following table.
   2017
Market Price
 Dividends
Per Share
Quarter  High Low 
1  $78.71
 $73.00
 $0.140
2  77.77
 74.11
 0.150
3  80.09
 74.68
 0.150
4  91.16
 80.32
 0.150
Year-end closing price$90.71
 
 
 
   2016
Market Price
 Dividends
Per Share
Quarter  High Low 
1  $57.01
 $48.58
 $0.135
2  62.39
 52.83
 0.140
3  65.21
 60.38
 0.140
4  74.83
 63.17
 0.140
Year-end closing price$73.76
 
 
 

The line graph shown below compares Torchmark’s cumulative total return on its common stock with the cumulative total returns of the Standard and Poor’s 500 Stock Index (S&P 500) and the Standard and Poor’s Life & Health Insurance Index (S&P Life & Health Insurance). Torchmark is one of the companies whose stock is included within both the S&P 500 and the S&P Life & Health Insurance Index.
*100 invested on 12/31/12 in stock or index, including reinvestment of dividends. Fiscal year ended December 31st.
(Copyright © 2018 Standard & Poor's, a division of S&P Global. All rights reserved.)

13
TMK 2017 FORM 10-K

Table of Contents



Purchases of Certain Equity Securities by the Issuer and Others for the Fourth Quarter 2017
Period(a) Total Number
of Shares
Purchased
 (b) Average
Price Paid
Per Share
 (c) Total Number of
Shares Purchased
as Part of Publicly
Announced Plans
or Programs
 (d) Maximum Number
of Shares (or
Approximate Dollar
Amount) that May
Yet Be Purchased
Under the Plans or
Programs
October 1-31, 2017260,690
 $82.44
 260,690
 
November 1-30, 2017593,200
 85.22
 593,200
 
December 1-31, 2017439,315
 89.91
 439,315
 
On August 7, 2017, Torchmark’s Board reaffirmed its continued authorization of the Company’s stock repurchase program in amounts and with timing that management, in consultation with the Board, determined to be in the best interest of the Company. The program has no defined expiration date or maximum number of shares to be purchased.




14
TMK 2017 FORM 10-K

Table of Contents



Item 6. Selected Financial Data
The following information should be read in conjunction with Torchmark’s Consolidated Financial Statements and related notes reported elsewhere in this Form 10-K:
(Dollar amounts in thousands except per share and percentage data)
Year ended December 31,2017 2016 2015 2014 2013
Premium revenue:         
Life$2,306,547
 $2,189,333
 $2,073,065
 $1,966,300
 $1,885,332
Health976,373
 947,663
 925,520
 869,440
 863,818
Other15
 38
 135
 400
 532
Total3,282,935
 3,137,034
 2,998,720
 2,836,140
 2,749,682
Net investment income847,885
 806,903
 773,951
 758,286
 734,650
Realized investment gains (losses)23,611
 (10,683) (8,791) 23,548
 7,990
Total revenue4,155,573
 3,934,629
 3,766,065
 3,620,095
 3,494,253
Income from continuing operations, net of tax1,458,263
 539,590
 516,293
 528,074
 507,205
Income from discontinued operations, net of tax(3,769) 10,189
 10,807
 14,865
 21,267
Net income(1)
1,454,494
 549,779
 527,100
 542,939
 528,472
Per common share:         
Basic earnings:         
Income from continuing operations12.53
 4.50
 4.13
 4.04
 3.68
Income from discontinued operations(0.03) 0.08
 0.08
 0.11
 0.16
Net income12.50
 4.58
 4.21
 4.15
 3.84
Diluted earnings:         
Income from continuing operations12.26
 4.41
 4.07
 3.98
 3.63
Income from discontinued operations(0.04) 0.08
 0.09
 0.11
 0.16
Net income(1)
12.22
 4.49
 4.16
 4.09
 3.79
Cash dividends declared0.60
 0.56
 0.54
 0.51
 0.45
Cash dividends paid0.59
 0.56
 0.53
 0.49
 0.44
Basic weighted average shares outstanding116,343
 120,001
 125,095
 130,722
 137,647
Diluted weighted average shares outstanding118,983
 122,368
 126,757
 132,640
 139,564
          
As of December 31,2017 2016 2015 2014 2013
Cash and invested assets$17,853,047
 $15,955,891
 $14,405,073
 $15,058,996
 $13,456,944
Total assets23,474,985
 21,436,087
 19,853,213
 20,272,259
 18,217,757
Short-term debt328,067
 264,475
 490,129
 238,398
 229,070
Long-term debt1,132,201
 1,133,165
 743,733
 992,130
 990,865
Shareholders' equity(1)
6,231,421
 4,566,861
 4,055,552
 4,697,466
 3,776,342
Per diluted common share(1)
52.95
 37.76
 32.71
 36.19
 27.66
Effect of fixed maturity revaluation on diluted
equity per common share(2)
13.18
 5.63
 2.62
 8.28
 1.81
Annualized premium in force:         
Life2,373,099
 2,262,736
 2,150,498
 2,044,545
 1,955,401
Health1,018,020
 998,634
 973,042
 947,323
 887,444
Total3,391,119
 3,261,370
 3,123,540
 2,991,868
 2,842,845
Basic shares outstanding114,593
 118,031
 122,370
 127,930
 134,252
Diluted shares outstanding117,696
 120,958
 123,996
 129,812
 136,537

(1)
On December 22, 2017, the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act was enacted into law which revises corporate income tax rates from 35% to 21%, among other modifications. See further discussion of the tax reform implications in the Results of Operations. Excluding the effects of tax reform, net income, net income per diluted common share, shareholders' equity and shareholders' equity per diluted common share would have been $581 million, $4.88, $5.36 billion and $45.52, respectively.
(2)
There is accounting guidance (ASC 320-10-35-1, Investments- Debt and Equity Securities) requiring available-for-sale fixed maturities to be recorded at fair value each period. The effect of this rule on diluted equity per share reflects the amount added or (deducted) under this rule to produce GAAP Shareholders’ equity per share. See discussion under the caption Capital Resources in Management’s Discussion and Analysis in this report concerning the effect this rule has on Torchmark’s equity.

15
TMK 2017 FORM 10-K

Table of Contents



Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
The following discussion should be read in conjunction with the Selected Financial Data and Torchmark’s Consolidated Financial Statements and Notes thereto appearing elsewhere in this report.
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
How Torchmark Views Its Operations: Torchmark is the holding company for a group of insurance companies which market primarily individual life, and supplemental health insurance to middle income households throughout the United States. We view our operations by segments, which are the insurance product lines of life, health, and annuities, and the investment segment that supports the product lines. Segments are aligned based on their common characteristics, comparability of the profit margins, and management techniques used to operate each segment.
Insurance Product Line Segments. As fully explained in Note 14—Business Segments, the insurance product line segments involve the marketing, underwriting, and the administration of policies. Each product line is further segmented by the various distribution units that market the insurance policies. Each distribution unit operates in a niche market offering insurance products designed for that particular market. Whether analyzing profitability of a segment as a whole, or the individual distribution units within the segment, the measure of profitability used by management is the underwriting margin, which is:
Premium revenue
Less:
Policy obligations
Policy acquisition costs and commissions
Investment Segment. The investment segment involves the management of our capital resources, including investments and the management of corporate debt and liquidity. Our measure of profitability for the investment segment is excess investment income, which is:
Net investment income
Less:
Required interest on net policy liabilities
Financing costs

The tables in Note 14—Business Segments in the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements reconcile Torchmark’s revenues and expenses by segment to its major income statement line items for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2017.

16
TMK 2017 FORM 10-K

Table of Contents



Current Year Highlights:

Net income as a return on equity (ROE) was 28.2%(1) and net operating income as a ROE, excluding net unrealized gains on the fixed maturity portfolio was 14.3%(1).

Total premium increased by 5% over the prior year. Life premium also increased by 5% for the year from $2.2 billion to $2.3 billion. Life underwriting margin also increased 5% from $574 million in 2016 to $604 million in 2017.

Net investment income increased 5% over the prior year. In addition, excess investment income, a measure used by management as explained below, increased by 7% over the prior year.

During 2017, the Company repurchased 4.1 million shares at a total cost of $325 million for an average share price of $78.67.

The following represents net income and net operating income from continuing operations for the 3 years ended December 31, 2017.

(1)As further discussed below regarding Tax Legislation, excluding the tax reform adjustment, net income as a ROE and net operating income as a ROE would have been 11.7% and 14.4%, respectively. In 2017, the Company recorded a one-time adjustment of $874 million impacting net income. As the impact of the Tax Legislation was treated as a non-operating event, it was excluded from net operating income.

Net income as a ROE and net operating income as a ROE, excluding net unrealized gains on the fixed maturity portfolioin 2016 were 12.0% and 14.6%, respectively and 11.9% and 14.5%, respectively in 2015. Net operating income as a ROE, excluding net unrealized gains on the fixed maturity portfolio is considered a non-GAAP measure. Management utilizes this measure to view the business without the effect of the unrealized gains or losses which are primarily attributable to fluctuation in interest rates on the available-for-sale portfolio.

Summary of Operations: Net income was $1.5 billion in 2017, compared with $550 million in 2016. This sharp increase was due to an $874 million increase to net income, primarily relating to a reduction of deferred income tax liabilities resulting from enactment of the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2017 (Tax Legislation). See further discussion below. Net income also increased in 2016 from $527 million in 2015. On a diluted per common share basis, 2017 net income rose

17
TMK 2017 FORM 10-K

Table of Contents



172% to $12.22 after an 8% increase in 2016, again largely related to implementation of the Tax Legislation. Without the impact of the Tax Legislation, net income per diluted common share would have been $4.88. Net income per diluted common share in 2016 rose to $4.49 from $4.16 in 2015. The per share results have exceeded the growth in dollar amounts due to our share repurchase program. Each year’s per share net income was affected by realized investment gains (losses), which were $0.15, $(0.06), and $(0.05), in 2017, 2016 and 2015, respectively. More information concerning realized investment gains and losses can be found under the caption Realized Gains and Losses in this report.

Net operating income from continuing operations rose each year over the prior year from $523 million in 2015 to $549 million in 2016 to $574 million in 2017. Net operating income is the consolidated total of segment profits after tax and as such is considered a non-GAAP measure. Net income is the most directly comparable GAAP measure. See Note 14—Business Segmentsfor a discussion of the usefulness and purpose of this measure. We do not consider realized gains and losses to be a component of our core insurance operations or operating segments. Additionally, net income was affected by certain significant and unusual non-operating items in each of the years 2015 through 2017. We do not view these items as components of core operating results because they are not indicative of past performance or future prospects of the insurance operations. We remove items such as these that relate to prior periods or are non-operating items when evaluating the results of current operations, and therefore exclude such matters from our segment analysis for current periods.

Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2017: On December 22, 2017, the Tax Legislation was enacted which changed existing tax law, including a reduction of the corporate income tax rate from 35% to 21% effective January 1, 2018. The Company recorded $877 million of tax benefits in net income as a result of re-measuring its deferred tax liabilities using the lower corporate tax rate as of the date of enactment. Based on the analysis of the Tax Legislation, the Company was able to determine that this amount is a reasonable estimate of the impact of the Tax Legislation in accordance with SEC Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 118. However, the Company will continue to analyze relevant information to complete the accounting for income taxes which may result in an adjustment to income tax expense in 2018. The accounting is expected to be complete when the 2017 U.S. corporate income tax returns are filed later in 2018. In addition, the Company early adopted ASU 2018-02, Income Statement—Reporting Comprehensive Income (Topic 220): Reclassification of Certain Tax Effects from Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income, and recorded a $252 million reclassification from Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income to Retained Earnings to eliminate the stranded tax effects associated with the tax rate change, primarily relating to the unrealized gains and losses on the available-for-sale fixed maturity portfolio. More information concerning income taxes is provided in Note 8—Income Taxes.

There will be substantial long-term benefits from the Tax Legislation due to the taxation of future profits at the new 21% tax rate. Looking forward, we are anticipating the effective tax rate on our net operating income before stock compensation expense to decrease and be in the range of 19% to 20%. Despite the lower expected tax rate for financial reporting purposes, in the short and intermediate term, we do not anticipate a significant reduction in our current tax expense, as benefits of the lower tax rate will be virtually offset by several provisions included in the Tax Legislation that increase the Company's current taxable income.

The below table illustrates the impact of the tax reform adjustment on certain balances.
 Prior to tax adjustment Tax reform adjustment GAAP balance
Current and deferred income taxes payable$2,189,402
 $(877,400) $1,312,002
Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss)1,171,874
 252,400
 1,424,274
Retained earnings4,181,208
 625,000
 4,806,208
Shareholders' equity5,357,443
 873,978
 6,231,421
Income before income taxes834,028
 (3,380) 830,648
Income tax benefit (expense)(249,743) 877,358
 627,615
Net income580,516
 873,978
 1,454,494
Total diluted net income per common share$4.88
 $7.34
 $12.22



18
TMK 2017 FORM 10-K

Table of Contents



Torchmark’s operations on a segment-by-segment basis are discussed in depth under the appropriate captions following in this report.

Analysis of Profitability by Segment
(Dollar amounts in thousands)
 2017 2016 2015 2017
Change
 % 2016
Change
 %
Life insurance underwriting margin$604,337
 $573,762
 $569,402
 $30,575
 5
 $4,360
 1
Health insurance underwriting margin219,508
 210,056
 204,377
 9,452
 4
 5,679
 3
Annuity underwriting margin10,562
 9,394
 4,568
 1,168
 12
 4,826
 106
Excess investment income239,363
 224,031
 219,504
 15,332
 7
 4,527
 2
Other insurance:      
   
  
Other income1,270
 1,534
 2,379
 (264) (17) (845) (36)
Administrative expense(210,590) (196,598) (186,191) (13,992) 7
 (10,407) 6
Corporate and other(43,285) (34,913) (37,667) (8,372) 24
 2,754
 (7)
Pre-tax total821,165
 787,266
 776,372
 33,899
 4
 10,894
 1
Applicable taxes(247,484) (237,906) (253,459) (9,578) 4
 15,553
 (6)
Net operating income from continuing operations573,681
 549,360
 522,913
 24,321
 4
 26,447
 5
Discontinued operations—Part D, net of tax
 9,033
 10,807
 (9,033) (100) (1,774) (16)
Net operating income573,681
 558,393
 533,720
 15,288
 3
 24,673
 5
Reconciling items, net of tax:             
Realized gains (losses)—investments17,590
 (6,944) (5,714) 24,534
   (1,230)  
Part D adjustments—discontinued operations(3,769) 1,156
 
 (4,925)   1,156
  
Guaranty fund assessments(1,171) 
 
 (1,171)   
  
Administrative settlements(5,628) (2,467) (906) (3,161)   (1,561)  
Non-operating fees(187) (359) 
 172
   (359)  
Tax reform adjustment873,978
 
 
 873,978
   
  
Net income$1,454,494
 $549,779
 $527,100
 $904,715
 165
 $22,679
 4

The life insurance segment is our strongest segment and is the largest contributor to earnings in each year presented. This segment contributed $31 million in 2017 and $4 million in 2016 to the growth in our underwriting margin. Also contributing to growth in income in both years was our health insurance segment, which provided $9 million of additional margin in 2017 and $6 million in 2016.
Excess investment income, the measure of profitability of our investment segment, increased 7% to $239 million from the prior year amount of $224 million. In 2016, excess investment income increased 2%. Investment yields continue to be pressured by investing at yields lower than the yield on dispositions and the average yield on the portfolio.
Total revenues rose 6% in 2017 to $4.2 billion, or $221 million over the prior year total of $3.9 billion. Life premium rose 5% or $117 million in 2017 to $2.3 billion. Life premium increased $116 million in 2016 to $2.2 billion. Net investment income rose $41 million or 5% in 2017, and rose 4% or $33 million in 2016. Health premium increased 3% to $976 million in 2017 and contributed $29 million to 2017 revenue growth, after having gained 2% to $948 million in 2016. Health premium contributed $22 million to 2016 revenue growth.
Life insurance premium and underwriting margins have grown in each of the last three years ended December 31, 2017. The increase in life premium was driven by sales growth and improvements in persistency. While premium and underwriting margins grew, margin as a percent of premium remained flat in 2017 at 26%, after decreasing from 27% to 26% from 2015 to 2016. Net life sales increased in 2017 to $416 million. Net life sales were flat between 2015 and 2016. The life insurance segment is discussed further in this report under the caption Life Insurance.
Health insurance premium income increased 3% to $976 million in 2017. Health net sales rose 9% to $158 million during 2017 due to both individual and group sales. Group sales vary significantly from period to period due to the

19
TMK 2017 FORM 10-K

Table of Contents



impact of large groups that are sold from time-to-time. First-year collected health premium fell 3% to $136 million from the prior year total of $140 million as a result of higher net sales in Medicare Supplement in the fourth quarter of 2015 that positively affected the 2016 first-year collected premium. Health margins as a percentage of premium were flat at 22%, with underwriting income increasing to $220 million for 2017 due to the growth in premium income. Underwriting income was $210 million in 2016 compared with $204 million in 2015. The health insurance segment is discussed further in this report under the caption Health Insurance.

We do not currently market annuities. See the caption Annuities for discussion of the Annuity segment.
Excess investment income, is based on three major components: net investment income, required interest on net policy liabilities (interest applicable to insurance products), and financing costs. In 2017, net investment income rose 5%, compared with 4% in 2016. At the same time, our investment portfolio grew 6% in 2017 and 2016, on an amortized cost basis. In recent years, the percentage growth in net investment income has been less than the growth in the overall investment portfolio due primarily to new investments being made at yield rates lower than the yield rates on dispositions and the average yield on the portfolio. The growth rate of net investment income is impacted at times by a lag between the time when proceeds from maturities and dispositions are received and when the proceeds are reinvested, during which the funds are held in cash. In addition, Torchmark’s share repurchase program (described later under this caption) has diverted cash that could have otherwise been used to acquire investments and increase net investment income. The growth in the investment portfolio has been augmented in 2017 and 2016 due to the receipt of certain receivables that had accumulated under our Medicare Part D business.
The interest required on net policy liabilities is deducted from net investment income, and generally grows in conjunction with the net policy liabilities that are supported by the invested assets. The lower new-money yields resulting from the low interest rate environment noted above have compressed excess investment income as required interest has continued to grow at approximately the same rate that net policy liabilities have grown. Financing costs, which consist of the interest required for debt service on our long and short-term debt, are also deducted from net investment income. Financing costs in 2017 increased 1% to $85 million from $83 million in 2016. The additional interest expense resulted primarily from an increase in the cost of our short-term borrowings and, in lesser part, from the issuance of our new 5.275% Junior Subordinated Debt security thirty-six days before the repayment of our 5.875% Junior Subordinated Debt security.
Insurance administrative expenses were up 7.1% in 2017 when compared with the prior year period, and increased to 6.4% as a percentage of premium from 6.3% in 2016 and 6.2% in 2015. The increase in administrative expenses is primarily due to an increase in other employee costs and investments in information technology. Corporate and Other expenses were up primarily due to an increase in stock-based compensation expense, reflecting Torchmark's higher share price as compared with the same period a year ago, and recognition of a one-time increase in stock-based compensation expense due to the Tax Legislation.



20
TMK 2017 FORM 10-K

Table of Contents



Share Purchases
Torchmark has in place an ongoing share repurchase program which began in 1986. With no specified authorization amount, we determine the amount of repurchases based on the amount of the excess cash flow at the Parent Company, general market conditions, and other alternative uses. The majority of these purchases are made from excess cash flow. Excess cash flow at the Parent Company is primarily comprised of dividends received from the insurance subsidiaries less interest expense paid on its debt, dividends paid to Torchmark shareholders, and other limited operating activities. Additionally, when stock options are exercised, proceeds from these exercises and the resulting tax benefit are used to repurchase additional shares on the open market to minimize dilution as a result of the option exercises. The Board of Directors has authorized the Company’s share repurchase program in amounts and with timing that management, in consultation with the Board, determines to be in the best interest of the Company and its shareholders. The following chart summarizes share purchase activity for each of the last three years.
Analysis of Share Purchases
(Amounts in thousands)
 2017 2016 2015
PurchasesShares Amount Shares Amount Shares Amount
Share repurchase program4,126
 $324,622
 5,208
 $311,332
 6,292
 $358,552
Option proceeds1,103
 88,367
 1,487
 93,452
 1,049
 59,974
Total5,229
 $412,989
 6,695
 $404,784
 7,341
 $418,526

Throughout the remainder of this discussion, share purchases refer only to those made from excess cash flow at the Parent Company.
A discussion of each of Torchmark’s segments follows. The following discussions are presented in the manner we view our operations, as described in Note 14—Business Segments.
Life Insurance
Life insurance is our largest insurance segment, with 2017 life premium representing 70% of total premium. Life underwriting income before other income and administrative expense represented 72% of the total in 2017. Additionally, investments supporting the reserves for life products produce the majority of excess investment income attributable to the investment segment.
We use three statistical measures as indicators of premium growth and sales over the near term: “annualized premium in force,” “net sales,” and “first-year collected premium.”

Annualized premium in force is defined as the premium income that would be received over the following twelve months at any given date on all active policies if those policies remain in force throughout the twelve-month period. Annualized premium in force is an indicator of potential growth in premium revenue.

Net sales is annualized premium issued (Gross premium that would be received during the policies' first year in force and assuming that none of the policies lapsed or terminated.), net of cancellations in the first thirty days after issue, except in the case of Globe Life Direct Response where net sales is annualized premium issued at the time the first full premium is paid after any introductory offer period has expired. We believe that net sales is a better indicator of the rate of premium growth as compared to annualized premium issued.

First-year collected premium is defined as the premium collected during the reporting period for all policies in their first policy year. First-year collected premium takes lapses into account in the first year when lapses are more likely to occur, and thus is a useful indicator of how much new premium is expected to be added to premium income in the future.


21
TMK 2017 FORM 10-K

Table of Contents



The following table presents the summary of results of life insurance. Further discussion of the results by distribution channel is included below.

LIFE INSURANCE
Summary of Results
(Dollar amounts in thousands)
 2017 2016 2015
 Amount 
% of
Premium
 Amount 
% of
Premium
 Amount 
% of
Premium
Premium and policy charges$2,306,547
 100
 $2,189,333
 100
 $2,073,065
 100
            
Policy obligations1,549,602
 67
 1,475,477
 67
 1,374,608
 67
Required interest on reserves(607,007) (26) (577,827) (26) (552,298) (27)
Net policy obligations942,595
 41
 897,650
 41
 822,310
 40
Commissions, premium taxes, and non-deferred acquisition expenses177,111
 8
 164,476
 8
 154,811
 8
Amortization of acquisition costs582,504
 25
 553,445
 25
 526,542
 25
Total expense1,702,210
 74
 1,615,571
 74
 1,503,663
 73
Insurance underwriting margin before other income and administrative expenses$604,337
 26
 $573,762
 26
 $569,402
 27
Life insurance premium rose 5% to $2.3 billion in 2017 after having increased 6% in 2016 to $2.2 billion. Life insurance products are marketed through several distribution channels. Premium income by distribution channel for each of the last three years is as follows:
LIFE INSURANCE
Premium by Distribution Channel
(Dollar amounts in thousands)
 2017 2016 2015
 Amount 
% of
Total
 Amount 
% of
Total
 Amount 
% of
Total
American Income Exclusive Agency$999,279
 43 $913,355
 42 $830,903
 40
Globe Life Direct Response812,907
 35 782,765
 36 746,693
 36
Liberty National Exclusive Agency274,635
 12 270,476
 12 271,113
 13
Other Agencies219,726
 10 222,737
 10 224,356
 11
 $2,306,547
 100 $2,189,333
 100 $2,073,065
 100
Annualized life premium in force was $2.37 billion at December 31, 2017, an increase of 4.9% over $2.26 billion a year earlier. Annualized life premium in force was $2.15 billion at December 31, 2015.

22
TMK 2017 FORM 10-K

Table of Contents



The following table shows net sales information for each of the last three years by distribution channel.
LIFE INSURANCE
Net Sales by Distribution Channel
(Dollar amounts in thousands)
 2017 2016 2015
 Amount 
% of
Total
 Amount 
% of
Total
 Amount 
% of
Total
American Income Exclusive Agency$223,259
 54 $209,856
 51 $198,046
 48
Globe Life Direct Response135,704
 33 150,267
 36 164,348
 40
Liberty National Exclusive Agency46,886
 11 40,159
 10 35,782
 9
Other Agencies10,233
 2 11,673
 3 13,705
 3
 $416,082
 100 $411,955
 100 $411,881
 100

The table below discloses first-year collected life premium by distribution channel.
LIFE INSURANCE
First-Year Collected Premium by Distribution Channel
(Dollar amounts in thousands)
 2017 2016 2015
 Amount 
% of
Total
 Amount 
% of
Total
 Amount 
% of
Total
American Income Exclusive Agency$182,538
 58 $173,573
 56 $156,206
 52
Globe Life Direct Response92,057
 29 98,496
 31 106,417
 35
Liberty National Exclusive Agency33,191
 10 29,103
 9 27,554
 9
Other Agencies9,633
 3 11,458
 4 12,036
 4
 $317,419
 100 $312,630
 100 $302,213
 100
The American Income Exclusive Agency has historically marketed primarily to members of labor unions. While labor unions are still the core market for this agency, American Income has diversified in recent years by focusing heavily on other affinity groups, third party internet vendor leads, and referrals to help ensure sustainable growth. This agency is Torchmark’s largest contributor to life premium of any distribution channel at 43% of Torchmark’s 2017 total. This group produced premium income of $999 million, an increase of 9% over the prior year total of $913 million, after having risen 10% in 2016. First-year collected premium was $183 million compared to $174 million in 2016, an increase of 5%. First-year collected premium rose 11% in 2016. Net sales increased 6% to $223 million in 2017 over the 2016 total of $210 million. Net sales increased 6% in 2016 over the 2015 total of $198 million. Sales growth in our captive agencies is generally dependent on growth in the size of the agency force. The American Income Agency's average agent count rose 4% to 6,962 in 2017. The average producing agent count is based on the actual count at the end of each week during the period.
The American Income Exclusive Agency continues to focus on growing and strengthening middle management to support sustainable growth of the agency force. To accomplish this, the agency places an emphasis on agent training programs and financial incentives that appropriately reward agents at all levels for helping develop and train its agents, including more home-office and webinar training programs. These programs are designed to provide each agent, from new recruits to top level managers, coaching and instruction specifically designed for their level of experience and responsibility. We have made considerable investments in information technology in support of the agency, including the launching of a lead mapping and management tool to the agency force. We anticipate this tool will help the Agency enhance agent productivity and agent retention.
The Globe Life Direct Response unit offers adult and juvenile life insurance through a variety of direct-to-consumer marketing approaches, which include direct mailings, insert media, and electronic media. These different approaches support and complement one another in the unit’s efforts to reach the consumer. The Globe Life Direct Response

23
TMK 2017 FORM 10-K

Table of Contents



channel’s growth has been fueled by constant innovation. In recent years, electronic media production has grown rapidly as management has aggressively increased marketing activities related to internet and mobile technology, and has focused on driving traffic to the inbound call center. We continually introduce new initiatives in this unit in an attempt to increase response rates.
While the juvenile market is an important source of sales, it also is a vehicle to reach the parents and grandparents of juvenile policyholders, who are more likely to respond favorably to a Globe Life Direct Response solicitation for life coverage on themselves than is the general adult population. Also, both juvenile policyholders and their parents are low acquisition-cost targets for sales of additional coverage over time.
Globe Life Direct Response’s life premium income rose 4% to $813 million, representing 35% of Torchmark’s total life premium during 2017. Life premium in this channel increased 5% in 2016 to $783 million over the 2015 total of $747 million. Net sales of $136 million for this group decreased 10% from $150 million in 2016, after a 9% decrease in 2016 due to operational changes designed to maximize underwriting margin dollars. We expect sales to decline, consistent with this recent trend, through 2018. First-year collected premium decreased 7% to $92 million in 2017 after having decreased 7% in 2016.
The Liberty National Exclusive Agency markets individual and group life insurance to middle-income customers. Life premium income for this agency was $275 million in 2017, an increase of 2% from $270 million in 2016. Life premium income in 2015 totaled $271 million. Net sales increased 17% during 2017 to $47 million over the 2016 total of $40 million. Net sales in 2016 increased 12%. The continued increases in net sales reflect changes in structure of the agency that were put in place several years ago. Middle management has also grown within the agency which will help continue this growth. First-year collected premium increased 14% to $33 million during 2017 and increased 6% in 2016 to $29 million.
The Liberty average producing agent count increased from 1,715 in 2016 to 2,017 in 2017. We continue to execute our long term plan to grow this agency through expansion from small-town markets in the southeast to more densely populated areas with larger pools of potential agent recruits and customers. Expansion of this agency’s presence into more heavily populated, less-penetrated areas will help create long term agency growth. Additionally, the agency's prospecting training program has helped to improve the ability of agents to develop new work site marketing business.
The Other Agencies distribution channels offering life insurance include the Military Agency, the UA Independent Agency (which predominantly writes health insurance), and various smaller distribution channels. The Other Agencies contributed $220 million of life premium income, or 10% of Torchmark’s total in 2017, but contributed only 2% of net sales for the year.

24
TMK 2017 FORM 10-K

Table of Contents



Health Insurance
Health insurance sold by Torchmark includes primarily Medicare Supplement insurance, critical illness coverage, accident coverage, and other limited-benefit supplemental health products. In this analysis, all health coverage plans other than Medicare Supplement are classified as limited-benefit plans.
Health premium accounted for 30% of our total premium in 2016,2017, while the health underwriting margin accounted for 26% of total underwriting margin, reflective of the lower underwriting margin as a percent of premium for health compared with life insurance. As noted under the caption Life Insurance, we have emphasized life insurance sales relative to health, due to life’s superior profitability and its greater contribution to excess investment income.
The following table presents the summary of results for health insurance.
HEALTH INSURANCE
Summary of Results
(Dollar amounts in thousands)
 
 2017 2016 2015
 Amount 
% of
Premium
 Amount 
% of
Premium
 Amount 
% of
Premium
Premium$976,373
 100
 $947,663
 100
 $925,520
 100
            
Policy obligations628,640
 65
 612,725
 65
 602,610
 65
Required interest on reserves(77,792) (8) (73,382) (8) (69,057) (7)
Net policy obligations550,848
 57
 539,343
 57
 533,553
 58
Commissions, premium taxes, and non-deferred acquisition expenses86,044
 9
 84,819
 9
 81,489
 9
Amortization of acquisition costs119,973
 12
 113,445
 12
 106,101
 11
Total expense756,865
 78
 737,607
 78
 721,143
 78
Insurance underwriting margin before other income and administrative expense$219,508
 22
 $210,056
 22
 $204,377
 22

Health premium increased 3% from $948 million in 2016 to $976 million in 2017. Health underwriting margin increased 4% from $210 million in 2016 to $220 million in 2017. Further discussion is included below by distribution channels.

25
TMK 2017 FORM 10-K

Table of Contents



Premium income by distribution channel for each of the last three years is as follows:

HEALTH INSURANCE
Premium by Distribution MethodChannel
(Dollar amounts in thousands)
 
2016 2015 20142017 2016 2015
Amount 
% of
Total
 Amount 
% of
Total
 Amount 
% of
Total
Amount 
% of
Total
 Amount 
% of
Total
 Amount 
% of
Total
United American Independent Agency                      
Limited-benefit plans$12,704
 $15,260
 $19,028
 $11,438
 $12,704
 $15,260
 
Medicare Supplement342,311
 330,070
 286,340
 352,690
 342,311
 330,070
 
355,015
 38 345,330
 37 305,368
 35364,128
 37 355,015
 38 345,330
 37
Family Heritage Exclusive Agency            
Limited-benefit plans236,075
 221,091
 204,667
 253,534
 236,075
 221,091
 
Medicare Supplement
 
 
 
 
 
 
236,075
 25 221,091
 24 204,667
 24253,534
 26 236,075
 25 221,091
 24
Liberty National Exclusive Agency            
Limited-benefit plans142,026
 142,130
 143,722
 144,128
 142,026
 142,130
 
Medicare Supplement59,772
 67,020
 78,295
 52,079
 59,772
 67,020
 
201,798
 21 209,150
 23 222,017
 25196,207
 20 201,798
 21 209,150
 23
American Income Exclusive Agency            
Limited-benefit plans84,064
 79,984
 78,244
 88,776
 84,064
 79,984
 
Medicare Supplement318
 355
 478
 260
 318
 355
 
84,382
 9 80,339
 9 78,722
 989,036
 9 84,382
 9 80,339
 9
Direct Response            
Limited-benefit plans552
 869
 805
 545
 552
 869
 
Medicare Supplement69,841
 68,741
 57,861
 72,923
 69,841
 68,741
 
70,393
 7 69,610
 7 58,666
 773,468
 8 70,393
 7 69,610
 7
Total Premium            
Limited-benefit plans475,421
 50 459,334
 50 446,466
 51498,421
 51 475,421
 50 459,334
 50
Medicare Supplement472,242
 50 466,186
 50 422,974
 49477,952
 49 472,242
 50 466,186
 50
$947,663
 100 $925,520
 100 $869,440
 100$976,373
 100 $947,663
 100 $925,520
 100


26
TMK 2017 FORM 10-K

Index to Financial StatementsTable of Contents



We market supplemental health insurance products through a number of distribution channels. The following table presents net sales by distribution methodchannel for the last three years.
 
HEALTH INSURANCE
Net Sales by Distribution MethodChannel
(Dollar amounts in thousands)
 
2016 2015 20142017 2016 2015
Amount 
% of
Total
 Amount 
% of
Total
 Amount 
% of
Total
Amount 
% of
Total
 Amount 
% of
Total
 Amount 
% of
Total
United American Independent Agency                      
Limited-benefit plans$558
 $734
 $873
 $500
 $558
 $734
 
Medicare Supplement55,451
 70,891
 82,971
 60,670
 55,451
 70,891
 
56,009
 39 71,625
 46 83,844
 4661,170
 39 56,009
 39 71,625
 46
Family Heritage Exclusive Agency            
Limited-benefit plans51,349
 50,266
 47,102
 56,534
 51,349
 50,266
 
Medicare Supplement
 
 
 
 
 
 
51,349
 35 50,266
 32 47,102
 2656,534
 36 51,349
 35 50,266
 32
Liberty National Exclusive Agency            
Limited-benefit plans19,513
 18,021
 17,084
 20,407
 19,513
 18,021
 
Medicare Supplement9
 41
 299
 
 9
 41
 
19,522
 13 18,062
 12 17,383
 1020,407
 13 19,522
 13 18,062
 12
American Income Exclusive Agency            
Limited-benefit plans12,666
 11,501
 9,162
 13,943
 12,666
 11,501
 
Medicare Supplement
 
 
 
 
 
 
12,666
 9 11,501
 7 9,162
 513,943
 9 12,666
 9 11,501
 7
Direct Response            
Limited-benefit plans
 
 6
 
 
 
 
Medicare Supplement5,560
 5,003
 23,099
 5,582
 5,560
 5,003
 
5,560
 4 5,003
 3 23,105
 135,582
 3 5,560
 4 5,003
 3
Total Net Sales            
Limited-benefit plans84,086
 58 80,522
 51 74,227
 4191,384
 58 84,086
 58 80,522
 51
Medicare Supplement61,020
 42 75,935
 49 106,369
 5966,252
 42 61,020
 42 75,935
 49
$145,106
 100 $156,457

100 $180,596
 100$157,636
 100 $145,106

100 $156,457
 100


27
TMK 2017 FORM 10-K

Index to Financial StatementsTable of Contents



The following table discloses first-year collected health premium by distribution method.channel.
 
HEALTH INSURANCE
First-Year Collected Premium by Distribution MethodChannel
(Dollar amounts in thousands)
 
2016 2015 20142017 2016 2015
Amount 
% of
Total
 Amount 
% of
Total
 Amount 
% of
Total
Amount 
% of
Total
 Amount 
% of
Total
 Amount 
% of
Total
United American Independent Agency            
Limited-benefit plans$547
 $660
 $710
 $458
 $547
 $660
 
Medicare Supplement64,848
 76,575
 49,519
 54,393
 64,848
 76,575
 
65,395
 47 77,235
 49 50,229
 4254,851
 40 65,395
 47 77,235
 49
Family Heritage Exclusive Agency            
Limited-benefit plans40,822
 39,196
 36,392
 44,535
 40,822
 39,196
 
Medicare Supplement
 
 
 
 
 
 
40,822
 29 39,196
 25 36,392
 3144,535
 33 40,822
 29 39,196
 25
Liberty National Exclusive Agency            
Limited-benefit plans16,103
 14,690
 13,132
 16,425
 16,103
 14,690
 
Medicare Supplement6
 168
 306
 2
 6
 168
 
16,109
 11 14,858
 9 13,438
 1116,427
 12 16,109
 11 14,858
 9
American Income Exclusive Agency            
Limited-benefit plans13,710
 12,041
 9,500
 14,673
 13,710
 12,041
 
Medicare Supplement
 
 
 
 
 
 
13,710
 10 12,041
 8 9,500
 814,673
 11 13,710
 10 12,041
 8
Direct Response            
Limited-benefit plans
 (2) 143
 
 
 (2) 
Medicare Supplement4,457
 13,843
 9,196
 5,657
 4,457
 13,843
 
4,457
 3 13,841
 9 9,339
 85,657
 4 4,457
 3 13,841
 9
Total First-Year Collected Premium            
Limited-benefit plans71,182
 51 66,585
 42 59,877
 5076,091
 56 71,182
 51 66,585
 42
Medicare Supplement69,311
 49 90,586
 58 59,021
 5060,052
 44 69,311
 49 90,586
 58
$140,493
 100 $157,171
 100 $118,898
 100$136,143
 100 $140,493
 100 $157,171
 100
 
Health premium increased 2% to $948 million in 2016 compared with $926 million in 2015 after an increase of 6% in 2015 over the 2014 total of $869 million. Medicare Supplement premium increased 1% to $472 million in 2016 compared with $466 million in 2015. Medicare Supplement premium totaled $423 million in 2014. Other limited-benefit health premium increased 4% to $475 million over the prior year total of $459 million. Other limited-benefit premium totaled $446 million in 2014.
Health net sales declined 7% to $145 million in 2016 from $156 million in 2015. Health net sales in 2014 totaled $181 million. Medicare Supplement net sales decreased 20% to $61 million in 2016, after declining 29% to $76 million in 2015. Limited-benefit net sales increased 4% to $84 million in 2016 compared with an increase of 8% in 2015 to $81 million.
Health first-year collected premium fell 11% to $140 million. Health first-year collected premium rose 32% during 2015. First year Medicare Supplement premium was down 23% in 2016 to $69 million from the prior year total of $91 million compared with an increase of $32 million or 53% in 2015 over 2014 total of $59 million. First year limited-benefit premium increased 7% to $71 million in 2016 compared with an increase of 11% in 2015 over the 2014 total of $60 million.

Index to Financial Statements

The decline in Medicare Supplement net sales and first-year premium was primarily due to group sales returning to a normal level after unusually high sales in late 2014 that positively affected the 2015 first-year collected premium.  Group sales vary significantly from period to period due to the impact of large groups that are sold from time to time which in turn impact premium income. First year limited-benefit premium increased 7% to $71 million in 2016 compared with an increase of 11% in 2015 over the 2014 total of $60 million.
Health care reform activity is not expected to have a significant impact on our operations, and we are continuing to monitor future developments. The Affordable Care Act (ACA) imposes an annual fee to health insurance issuers offering commercial health insurance as well as another fee for premium stabilization. These taxes totaled $621 thousand, $1.2 million and $1.8 million in 2016, 2015 and 2014, respectively.
The UA Independent Agency consists of independent agencies appointed with Torchmark who may also sell for other companies. The UA Independent Agency was Torchmark’s largest health agency in terms of health premium income. In 2016,2017, premium income was $355$364 million, representing 38%37% of Torchmark’s total health premium. Net sales were $56$61 million, or 39% of Torchmark’s health sales. This agency is also Torchmark’s largest producer of Medicare Supplement insurance, with Medicare Supplement premium income of $342$353 million. The UA Independent Agency represents 72%74% of all Torchmark Medicare Supplement premium and 91%92% of Medicare Supplement net sales. Medicare Supplement premium in this agency rose 4%3% in 2016.2017. Total health premium increased 3% in 20162017 and 13% in 2015.2016. Medicare Supplement net sales decreased 22%increased 9% in 20162017 from the prior year primarily due to a declineincreases in individual and group sales. As noted earlier, Group Medicare Supplement sales have historically fluctuated from period to period.
The Family Heritage Exclusive Agency primarily markets limited-benefit supplemental health insurance in non-urban areas. Most of their policies include a cash-back feature, such as a return of premium whereby any excess of premiums over claims paid is returned to the policyholder at the end of a specified period stated within the insurance policy. Management expects to grow this agency through geographic expansion and continuing incorporation of Torchmark’s recruiting programs.systems. The Family Heritage Agency contributed $51$57 million in net sales in 2016,2017, compared with $51 million in 2016 and $50 million in 2015 and $47 million in 2014.2015. Health premium income was $236$254 million in 2016,2017, representing 25%26% of Torchmark’s

28
TMK 2017 FORM 10-K

Table of Contents



health premium. This compared with $236 million or 25% of health premium in 2016 and $221 million or 24% of health premium in 2015 and $205 million or 24% in 2014.2015. The average producing agent count was 923995 for the year ended December 31, 2016,2017, compared with 882923 for the same period in 2015,2016, an increase of 5%8%.
The Liberty National Exclusive Agency represented 21%20% of all Torchmark health premium income at $202$196 million in 2016.2017. The Liberty Agency markets limited-benefit supplemental health products consisting primarily of critical illness insurance. Much of Liberty’s health business is now generated through work site marketing targeting small businesses of 10 to 25 employees. In 2016,2017, health premium income in the Agency declined 4% from prior year premium of $209 million3% after declining 6%4% during 2015.2016. Liberty’s health premium decline has been due primarily to its declining Medicare Supplement block. Liberty's first-year collected premium increased 8%2% to $16 million in 20162017 compared with an increase of 11% to $15 million8% in 2015,2016, reflecting the steady increase in net sales of limited-benefit plans in the agency.
Other distribution. Certain of our other distribution channels market health products, although their main emphasis is on life insurance. On a combined basis, they accounted for 16%17% of health premium in 20162017 and 2015.16% in 2016. The American Income Exclusive Agency primarily markets accident plans. The Direct Response group markets primarily Medicare Supplements to employer or union-sponsored groups. Direct Response added $6 million of Medicare Supplement net sales in 2017 and 2016 compared withand $5 million in 2015.
In 2016 and 2015, and $23 million in 2014. The higher net sales in 2014 were duethe Affordable Care Act (ACA) imposed an annual fee to the addition of a large new group in the third quarter of 2014.

Index to Financial Statements


As presented in the following table, Torchmark’s health insurance underwriting income before other incomeissuers offering commercial health insurance as well as another fee for premium stabilization. These fees totaled $621 thousand and administrative expense increased 3% to $210$1.2 million in 2016 after an increase of 3% to $204 million in 2015. As a percentage of health premium, marginsand 2015, respectively. There were flat at 22% in 2016 and were down slightly to 22% in 2015 from 23% in 2014.

HEALTH INSURANCE
Summary of Results
(Dollar amounts in thousands)
 2016 2015 2014
 Amount 
% of
Premium
 Amount 
% of
Premium
 Amount 
% of
Premium
Premium$947,663
 100
 $925,520
 100
 $869,440
 100
            
Policy obligations612,725
 65
 602,610
 65
 559,817
 64
Required interest on reserves(73,382) (8) (69,057) (7) (64,401) (7)
Net policy obligations539,343
 57
 533,553
 58
 495,416
 57
Commissions, premium taxes, and non-deferred acquisition expenses84,819
 9
 81,489
 9
 79,475
 9
Amortization of acquisition costs113,445
 12
 106,101
 11
 95,230
 11
Total expense737,607
 78
 721,143
 78
 670,121
 77
Insurance underwriting income before other income and administrative expense$210,056
 22
 $204,377
 22
 $199,319
 23

no fees for 2017.

Annuities. Our fixed annuity balances at the end of 2017 and 2016 2015, and 2014 were $1.24 billion, $1.32$1.25 billion and $1.36$1.29 billion, respectively. Underwriting income was $10.6 million, $9.4 million, and $4.6 million and $4.3 million in each offor the respective years.three years ended December 31, 2017, respectively.

While the fixed annuity account balance has been declining slightly year over year, underwriting income has increased each year over the prior year. The significant increase in underwriting income in 2016 was primarily due to a slowdown in amortization as assumptions were adjusted to reflect longer retention of the annuity block than previously estimated as a result of the continuing low interest rate environment. Policy charges have actually declined slightly in each successive year. The majority of policy charges consist of surrender charges which are based on a function of account size and time lapsed since deposit. A considerable portion of fixed annuity profitability is derived from the spread of investment income exceeding contractual interest requirements, which can result in negative net policy obligations. In the three-year period, however, spreads tended to level as crediting rates reached guaranteed minimums. We do not currently market annuity products, favoring instead protection-oriented life and health insurance products. Therefore, we do not expect that annuities will be a significant portion of our business or marketing strategy going forward.


29
TMK 2017 FORM 10-K

Table of Contents

Index to Financial Statements

Administrative expenses. Operating expenses are included in the Corporate and Other and Corporate Segmentssegment and are classified into two categories: insurance administrative expenses and expenses of the parent company.Parent Company. The following table is an analysis of operating expenses for the three years ended December 31, 2016.2017.
 
Operating Expenses Selected Information
(Dollar amounts in thousands)
 
 2017 2016 2015
 Amount 
% of
Premium
 Amount 
% of
Premium
 Amount 
% of
Premium
Insurance administrative expenses:           
Salaries$96,185
 2.9 $91,415
 2.9 $87,262
 2.9
Non-salary employee costs33,539
 1.0 29,852
 1.0 30,683
 1.0
Information technology costs26,048
 0.8 23,303
 0.7 17,307
 0.6
Other administrative expense46,066
 1.4 43,727
 1.4 43,694
 1.4
Legal expense—insurance8,752
 0.3 8,301
 0.3 7,245
 0.3
Total insurance administrative expenses210,590
 6.4 196,598
 6.3 186,191
 6.2
Parent company expense9,631
   8,587
   9,003
  
Stock-based compensation expense37,034
   26,326
   28,664
  
Non-operating fees
   553
   
  
Total operating expenses, per
Consolidated Statements of Operations
$257,255
   $232,064
   $223,858
  
            
 2016 2015 2014
 Amount 
% of
Premium
 Amount 
% of
Premium
 Amount 
% of
Premium
Insurance administrative expenses:           
Salaries$91,415
 2.9 $87,262
 2.9 $81,227
 2.9
Non-salary employee costs29,852
 1.0 30,683
 1.0 27,471
 1.0
Information technology costs23,303
 0.7 17,307
 0.6 14,465
 0.5
Other administrative expense43,727
 1.4 43,694
 1.4 41,704
 1.5
Legal expense—insurance8,301
 0.3 7,245
 0.3 9,965
 0.3
Total insurance administrative expenses196,598
 6.3 186,191
 6.2 174,832
 6.2
Parent company expense8,587
   9,003
   8,159
  
Stock compensation expense26,326
   28,664
   32,203
  
Litigation settlements
   
   2,337
  
Non-operating fees553
   
   
  
Total operating expenses, per Consolidated Statements of Operations
$232,064
   $223,858
   $217,531
  
            
Insurance administrative expenses:            
Increase (decrease) over prior year5.6% 6.5% (0.5)% 7.1% 5.6% 6.5% 
Total operating expenses:            
Increase (decrease) over prior year3.7% 2.9% 2.9 % 10.9% 3.7% 2.9% 
 
Insurance administrative expenses were up 5.6%7.1% in 20162017 when compared with the prior year after increasing 6.5%5.6% during 2015.2016. As a percentage of total premium, insurance administrative expenses increased to 6.4% in 2017 from 6.3% in 2016 fromand 6.2% in 2015 and 2014.2015. Total operating expenses increased 10.9% in 2017, after increasing 3.7% in 2016, after increasing 2.9% in 2015.2016. The primary reason for the increase in administrative expenses areother employee costs was due primarily to higher pension expense driven by lower interest rates.
The increase in information technology costs. costs was due to investments that will enhance our customer experience, expand our data analytics capabilities, modernize our systems in order to improve our ability to react quickly to future changes, and bolster our information security programs.
The declineincrease in stockstock-based compensation expense iswas primarily due to lowerhigher expense associated with performanceequity awards, reflecting Torchmark's higher share awardsprice and lowerhigher stock option values onas compared with the 2016 and 2015 grants.same period a year ago. The increase also reflects a one-time increase in stock-based compensation expense due to the effects of the Tax Legislation as previously discussed.


30
TMK 2017 FORM 10-K

Index to Financial Statements
Table of Contents



Investments. We manage our capital resources including investments, debt, and cash flow through the investment segment. Excess investment income represents the profit margin attributable to investment operations. It is the measure that we use to evaluate the performance of the investment segment as described in Note 14—Business Segments in the Notes to the Consolidated FinancialStatements.. It is defined as net investment income less both the required interest attributable to net policy liabilities and the interest cost associated with capital funding or “financing costs.”
We also view excess investment income per diluted common share as an important and useful measure to evaluate the performance of the investment segment. It is defined as excess investment income divided by the total diluted weighted average shares outstanding, representing the contribution by the investment segment to the consolidated earnings per share of the Company. Since implementing our share repurchase program in 1986, we have used $6.8$7.1 billion of excess cash flow at the Parent Company to repurchase Torchmark shares after determining that the repurchases provided a greater return than other investment alternatives. Share repurchases reduceIf we had not used this excess investment income because of the foregone earnings on the cash that would otherwise have beento repurchase shares, but had instead invested it in interest-bearing assets, but they also reduce the number ofwe would have earned more investment income and had more shares outstanding. In order to put all capital resource uses on a comparable basis, we believe that excess investment income per diluted share is an appropriate measure of the investment segment.
 
Excess Investment Income. The following table summarizes Torchmark’s investment income and excess investment income.
 
Analysis of Excess Investment Income
(Dollar amounts in thousands except for per share data)
 
2016 2015 20142017 2016 2015
Net investment income$806,903
 $773,951
 $758,286
$847,885
 $806,903
 $773,951
Interest on net insurance policy liabilities:          
Interest on reserves(702,340) (674,650) (649,848)(734,370) (702,340) (674,650)
Interest on deferred acquisition costs202,813
 196,845
 192,052
210,380
 202,813
 196,845
Net required interest(499,527) (477,805) (457,796)(523,990) (499,527) (477,805)
Financing costs(83,345) (76,642) (76,126)(84,532) (83,345) (76,642)
Excess investment income$224,031
 $219,504
 $224,364
$239,363
 $224,031
 $219,504
          
Excess investment income per diluted share(1)
$1.83
 $1.73
 $1.69
$2.01
 $1.83
 $1.73
          
Mean invested assets (at amortized cost)$14,461,502
 $13,697,129
 $13,278,028
$15,376,781
 $14,461,502
 $13,697,129
Average net insurance policy liabilities(2)(1)
8,945,850
 8,574,699
 8,240,435
9,359,780
 8,945,850
 8,574,699
Average debt and preferred securities (at amortized cost)1,379,933
 1,343,663
 1,287,740
1,458,706
 1,379,933
 1,343,663

(1)
Certain current year amounts were prospectively adjusted to give effect to the adoption of ASU 2016-09 related to excess tax benefits from stock compensation as described in Note 1—Significant Accounting Policiesunder "Accounting Pronouncements Adopted in the Current Year."
(2)Net of deferred acquisition costs, excluding the associated unrealized gains and losses thereon.

Excess investment income increased $5$15 million or 7% during 2017 after increasing 2% during 2016. The rate of growth was higher in 2017 than in 2016, overin part, because excess investment income during 2016 was negatively impacted by an increase in financing costs attributable to the early refinancing of our 6.375% Senior Notes as is discussed below in the discussion of our financing costs. In addition, the growth rate in 2017 was positively impacted by the investment of positive cash flows relating to the collection in 2016 and 2017 of various receivables that had accumulated in prior year. years in the Medicare Part D business.

Excess investment income decreased $5 million or 2% in 2015. On a per diluted common share basis, excess investment income increased 10% during 2017 after increasing 6% to $1.83 induring 2016. Excess investment income increased 2% to $1.73 per diluted common share in 2015, after having increased 8% in the prior year. The higher percentage increase in thegenerally increases at a faster pace than excess investment income perbecause the number of diluted share amount over the percentage increase in the dollar amount of excess investment income for those same periods isshares outstanding generally decreases from year to year as a result of our share repurchase program.

The largest component of excess investment income is net investment income, which increased at a compound annual growth rate of 4% during the last three years. Growth in net investment income has been negatively impacted in recent years by the declining interest rate environment during which time we have invested new money and reinvested the

31
TMK 2017 FORM 10-K

Table of Contents



proceeds from bonds that matured or were called or otherwise disposed of at yield rates less than what we earned on these bonds before their maturity or disposition. We currently expect that the average annual turnover rate of fixed maturity assets during the next five years will not exceed 1% to 3% of the portfolio, and will not have a significant negative impact on the growth of net investment income. Presented in the following chart is the growth in net investment income and the growth in mean invested assets.
2016 2015 20142017 2016 2015
Growth in net investment income4.3% 2.1% 3.2%5.1% 4.3% 2.1%
Growth in mean invested assets (at amortized cost)5.6% 3.2% 3.4%6.3% 5.6% 3.2%


Index to Financial Statements

The largest component of excess investment income is net investment income, which rose 4% to $807 million in 2016. It increased 2% to $774 million in 2015 from $758 million in 2014. In 2016, fixed maturity yields averaged 5.78% on a tax-equivalent and effective-yield basis, compared with 5.84% in 2015 and 5.91% in 2014.Growth in net investment income has been slower than the growth in mean invested assets in recent years as a result of the decline in the average yields. The decrease in the overall portfolio yield from 2014 to 2016 was due primarily to reinvesting proceeds from calls and maturities at yield rates lower than the bonds earned before it was called or matured.

Net investment income has also been negatively affected in the calendar years 2014 through 2016 by the CMS requirement for us to pay certain Medicare Part D claims costs during the current period that are ultimately the responsibility of the government, but are not reimbursed until the following year. Because of the overall design of the program and higher Part D claims due to higher overall drug costs, we have incurred extensive upfront costs that are not reimbursed by CMS until late in the following respective year. We also experience delays from the time certain claims are paid until related drug rebates are received from various pharmaceutical companies. These delays in reimbursements cause a lag in the timing of investable cash flows that result in lower investment income than would have been earned absent the delays. We estimate the delays resulted in a loss of approximately $5 million, $8 million and $9 million of pre-tax net investment income in 2014, 2015 and 2016, respectively. As we have exited this business, the negative impact is expected to be approximately $2 million to $3 million in 2017 and negligible in 2018.

While net investment income in recent years has been negatively impacted by the factors discussed above, we would expect to see only modest declines in the average portfolio yield rate over the next few years. We anticipate that approximately 2% of fixed maturities on average are expected to run off each year over the next five years. Accordingly, we believe it is unlikely that dispositions will have a significant negative impact on net investment income and the growth rate of net investment income in the next few years.

Should interest rates rise, especially long-term rates, Torchmark's net investment income would benefit due to higher interest rates on new purchases. WeWhile such a rise in interest rates could adversely affect the fair value of the fixed maturities portfolio, we could withstand an increase in interest rates of approximately 60100 to 65105 basis points before the net unrealized gains on our fixed maturity portfolio as of December 31, 20162017 would be eliminated (assuming there were no credit related valuation declines).eliminated. Should interest rates increase further than that, we would not be concerned with potential interest rate driven unrealized losses in our fixed maturity portfolio because we have the intent and, more importantly, the ability, to hold our fixed maturities to maturity.

Required interest on net insurance policy liabilities reduces net investment income as it is the amount of net investment income considered by management necessary to “fund” the required interest included in the insurance segments. As such, it is removed from the investment segment and applied to the insurance segments to offset the effect of the required interest from the insurance segments. As discussed in Note 14-Business Segmentsin the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements,, management believes this provides a more meaningful analysis of the investment and insurance segments. Required interest is based on the actuarial interest assumptions used in discounting the benefit reserve liability and the amortization of deferred acquisition costs for our insurance policies in force. The great majority of our life and health insurance policies are fixed interest-rate protection policies, not investment products, and are accounted for under current accounting guidance for long-duration insurance products which mandates that interest rate assumptions for a particular block of business be “locked in” for the life of that block of business. Each calendar year, we set the discount rate to be used to calculate the benefit reserve liability and the amortization of the deferred acquisition cost asset for all insurance policies issued that year. That rate is based on the new money yields that we expect to earn on cash flow received in the future from policies of that issue year, and cannot be changed. The discount rate used for policies issued in the current year has no impact on the in force policies issued in prior years as the rates of all prior issue years are also locked in. As such, the overall discount rate for the entire in force block is a weighted average of the discount rates being used from all issue years. Changes in the overall weighted-average discount rate over time are caused by changes in the mix of the reserves and the deferred acquisition cost asset by issue year on the entire block of in force business. Business issued in the current year has very little impact on the overall weighted-average discount rate due to the size of our in force business.

BecauseSince actuarial discount rates are locked in for life on essentially all of our business, benefit reserves and deferred acquisition costs are not affected by interest rate fluctuations unless a loss recognition event occurs. Due to the strength of our underwriting margins and the current positive spread between the yield on our investment portfolio and the weighted-average discount rate of our in force block, we don’tdo not expect an extended low-interest-rate environment to cause a loss recognition event.
 

32
TMK 2017 FORM 10-K

Index to Financial StatementsTable of Contents



Information about interest on net policy liabilities is shown in the following table.

Required Interest on Net Insurance Policy Liabilities
(Dollar amounts in thousands)
Required
Interest
 
Average Net
Insurance
Policy  Liabilities
 
Average
Discount
Rate
Required
Interest
 
Average Net
Insurance
Policy  Liabilities
 
Average
Discount
Rate
2017     
Life and Health$468,038
 $8,099,319
 5.78%
Annuity55,952
 1,260,461
 4.44
Total$523,990
 $9,359,780
 5.60
Increase in 20174.90% 4.63%  
2016          
Life and Health$442,021
 $7,658,639
 5.77%$442,021
 $7,658,639
 5.77%
Annuity57,506
 1,287,211
 4.47
57,506
 1,287,211
 4.47
Total$499,527
 $8,945,850
 5.58
$499,527
 $8,945,850
 5.58
Increase in 20164.55% 4.33%  4.55% 4.33% 

2015          
Life and Health$418,432
 $7,256,732
 5.77%$418,432
 $7,256,732
 5.77%
Annuity59,373
 1,317,967
 4.50
59,373
 1,317,967
 4.50
Total$477,805
 $8,574,699
 5.57
$477,805
 $8,574,699
 5.57
Increase in 20154.37% 4.06% 

4.37% 4.06% 

2014     
Life and Health$396,658
 $6,901,566
 5.75%
Annuity61,138
 1,338,869
 4.57
Total$457,796
 $8,240,435
 5.56
Increase in 20144.99% 4.95% 

 
Excess investment income is also impacted by financing costs. Financing costs for the investment segment primarily consist of interest on our various debt instruments and are deducted from excess investment income. The table below presents the components of financing costs and reconciles interest expense per the Consolidated Statements of Operations.
 
Analysis of Financing Costs
(AmountsDollar amounts in thousands)
 
2016 2015 20142017 2016 2015
Interest on funded debt$75,988
 $71,180
 $71,072
$74,115
 $75,988
 $71,180
Interest on term loan993
 
 
2,336
 993
 
Interest on short-term debt6,360
 5,457
 5,013
8,076
 6,360
 5,457
Other4
 5
 41
5
 4
 5
Financing costs$83,345
 $76,642
 $76,126
$84,532
 $83,345
 $76,642
 
Financing costs increased $1 million or 1% from 2016 to 2017. In 2017, interest on short-term debt increased because of the increase in the weighted-average interest rate on such debt. Financing costs also increased $7 million or 9% from 2015 to 2016. The2016 due primarily to the additional interest expense on our funded debt resulted fromassociated with the issuance of our newa 6.125% Junior Subordinated Debt security seventy days before the maturity and repayment of ourthe 6.375% Senior Notes. In 2016, interest on short-term debt increased because of the increase in the weighted-average interest rate. Financing costs also increased slightly from 2014 to 2015. More information on our debt transactions are disclosed in the Financial Condition section of this report and in Note 11—Debt in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
 

Realized Gains and Losses.Our life and health insurance companies collect premium income from policyholders for the eventual payment of policyholder benefits, sometimes paid many years or even decades in the future. Because benefits are expected to be paid in future periods, premium receipts in excess of current expenses are invested to provide for these obligations. For this reason, we hold a significant investment portfolio as a part of our core insurance operations. This portfolio consists primarily of high-quality fixed maturities containing an adequate yield to provide for the cost of carrying these long-term insurance product obligations. As previously noted, growtha result, fixed maturities are generally held for

33
TMK 2017 FORM 10-K

Table of Contents



long periods to support the liabilities. Expected yields on these investments are taken into account when setting insurance premium rates and product profitability expectations.
Despite our intent to hold fixed maturity investments for a long period of time, investments are occasionally sold or called, resulting in a realized gain or loss. These gains and losses generally occur only incidentally, usually as the result of bonds sold because of deterioration in investment quality of issuers or calls by the issuers. Investment losses are also caused by write downs due to impairments. We do not engage in trading investments for profit. Therefore, gains or losses which occur in protecting the portfolio or its yield, or which result from events that are beyond our control, are only secondary to our core insurance operations of providing insurance coverage to policyholders.
Realized gains and losses can be significant in relation to the earnings from core insurance operations, and as a result, can have a material positive or negative impact on net income. The significant fluctuations caused by gains and losses can cause period-to-period trends of net income that are not indicative of historical core operating results or predictive of the future trends of core operations. Accordingly, they have no bearing on core insurance operations or segment results as we view operations. For these reasons, and in line with industry practice, we remove the effects of realized gains and losses when evaluating overall insurance operating results.
The following table summarizes our tax-effected realized gains (losses) by component for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2017.

Analysis of Realized Gains (Losses), Net of Tax
(Dollar amounts in thousands, except for per share data)
 Year Ended December 31,
 2017 2016 2015
 Amount Per Share Amount Per Share Amount Per Share
Fixed maturities:           
Sales$2,587
 $0.02
 $(17,209) $(0.14) $(10,813) $(0.09)
Called or tendered20,292
 0.17
 10,290
 0.08
 4,652
 0.04
Write-downs(159)









Loss on redemption of debt(2,627) (0.02) 
 
 
 
Other(2,503) (0.02) (25) 
 447
 
Total$17,590
 $0.15
 $(6,944) $(0.06) $(5,714) $(0.05)

As described in Note 4—Investments under the caption Other-than-temporary impairments, the Company recorded $245 thousand ($159 thousand, net of tax) in security write-downs. We did not incur any write downs in our excess investment income decline when growth in income fromfixed maturity portfolio as a result of other-than-temporary impairment for the portfolio is less than that of the interest required by policy liabilitiesyears 2015 and financing costs, as has been the case in recent years. In an extended low-interest-rate environment, the portfolio yield will tend to decline as we invest new money at lower long-term rates.
Excess investment income benefits from increases in long-term rates available on new investments and decreases in short-term borrowing rates. Of these two factors, higher investment rates have the greater impact because the amount2016.

Index to Financial Statements

of cash that we invest is significantly greater than the amount that we borrow at short-term rates. Therefore, Torchmark would benefit if rates, especially long-term rates, were to rise.

Investment Acquisitions. Torchmark’s investment policy calls for investing in fixed maturities that are investment grade and meet our quality and yield objectives. We generally prefer to invest in securities with longer maturities because they more closely match the long-term nature of our policy liabilities. We believe this strategy is appropriate because our cash flows are generally stable and predictable. If longer-term securities that meet our quality and yield objectives are not available, we do not relax our quality objectives, but instead, consider investing in shorter term or lower yielding securities, taking into consideration the slope of the yield curve and other factors.

During calendar years 20142015 through 2016,2017, Torchmark invested almost exclusively in fixed maturity securities, primarily in corporate bonds with longer-term maturities. The following table summarizes selected information for fixed maturity purchases for the last three years. The effective annual yield shown is the yield calculated to the potential termination date that produces the lowest yield, commonly referred to as the “worst call date.” For non-callable bonds, the worst-call date is always the maturity date. For callable bonds, the worst-call date is the call date that produces the lowest yield, typically the first call date.


34
TMK 2017 FORM 10-K

Table of Contents



Fixed Maturity Acquisitions Selected Information
(Dollar amounts in thousands)
Year Ended December 31,Year Ended December 31,
2016 2015 20142017 2016 2015
Cost of acquisitions: (1)
     
Cost of acquisitions(1):
     
Investment-grade corporate securities$1,505,135
 $1,026,520
 $696,264
$1,308,567
 $1,505,135
 $1,026,520
Taxable municipal securities13,023
 29,092
 

 13,023
 29,092
Other investment-grade securities14,727
 15,296
 8,729
6,042
 14,727
 15,296
Total fixed maturity acquisitions$1,532,885
 $1,070,908
 $704,993
$1,314,609
 $1,532,885
 $1,070,908
          
Effective annual yield (one year compounded) (2)
4.67% 4.79% 4.77%4.67% 4.67% 4.79%
Average life (in years, to next call)24.6
 27.2
 22.9
23.0
 24.6
 27.2
Average life (in years to maturity)25.4
 27.9
 23.4
24.0
 25.4
 27.9
Average ratingBBB+
 BBB+
 BBB+
BBB+
 BBB+
 BBB+
(1)Includes unsettled trades of $3 million for 2016.
(2)Tax-equivalent basis, where the yield on tax-exempt securities is adjusted to produce a yield equivalent to the pretax yield on taxable securities.
We prefer to invest primarily in bonds that are not callable (on other than a make-whole basis) prior to maturity, but we periodically invest some funds in callable bonds when the incremental yield available on such bonds warrants doing so. For investments in callable bonds, the actual life of the investment will depend on whether the issuer calls the investment prior to the maturity date. Given our investments in callable bonds, the actual average life of our investments cannot be known at the time of the investment. However absentAbsent sales, however, the average life will not be less than the average life to next call and will not exceed the average life to maturity. Data for both of these average life measures is provided in the above chart.
 
During the three years 2014From 2015 through 2016,2017, acquisitions consisted of securities spanning a diversified range of issuers, industry sectors, and geographical regions. All of the acquired securities were investment grade. In addition to the fixed maturity acquisitions, Torchmark invested $30$55 million in a limited partnershipother long-term investments in 20152017 compared with an additional investment in the partnership of $19$20 million in 2016. The limited partnership is a diversified investment fund that currently invests opportunistically2016 and $32 million in global credit assets with the potential for attractive returns relative to risk. It is classified within long-term investments.2015.

New cash flow available for investment has been primarily provided through our insurance operations and interest received on existing investments. The amount of cash available for investment in 2016 was greater than 2015 due in part to the collection of various receivables from our Medicare Part D business. In some years, a significant amount of new investments can be derived from proceeds from dispositions including issuer calls. IssuerWhile calls as a result of the low-interest environment experienced during the past three years, were an important factor. Calls increase funds available for investment, but as noted earlier in this discussion, they can also have a negative impact on investment income if the proceeds from the calls are reinvested in

Index to Financial Statements

bonds that have lower yields than those of the bonds that were called. Issuer calls were $371 million in 2017, $182 million in 2016, and $178 million in 2015, and $160 million in 2014.2015.

Portfolio Composition. The composition of the investment portfolio at book value on December 31, 2017 and 2016 was as follows:follows
:
Invested Assets
(Dollar amounts in thousands)
2016 20152017 2016

Amount % of Total Amount % of TotalAmount % of Total Amount % of Total
Fixed maturities (at amortized cost)$14,188,050
 96 $13,251,871
 96$14,995,101
 95 $14,188,050
 96
Policy loans507,975
 3 492,462
 4529,529
 3 507,975
 3
Other long-term investments(1)
53,355
  37,579
 107,953
 1 53,355
 
Short-term investments72,040
 1 38,438
 127,071
 1 72,040
 1
Total$14,821,420
 100 $13,820,350
 100$15,759,654
 100 $14,821,420
 100
(1)Includes equities available for sale at amortized cost.

35
TMK 2017 FORM 10-K

Table of Contents



Approximately 96%95% of our investments at book value are in a diversified fixed maturity portfolio. Policy loans, which are secured by policy cash values, make up 3% of our investments. We also have insignificant investments in equity securities and other long-term investments. Because fixed maturities represent such a significant portion of our investment portfolio, the remainder of the discussion of portfolio composition will focus on fixed maturities.

Selected information concerning the fixed maturity portfolio is as follows:
Fixed Maturities
Fixed Maturity Portfolio Selected Information
 
 At December 31,
 2016 2015
Average annual effective yield (1)
5.74% 5.83%
Average life, in years, to:
 
Next call (2)
17.6
 17.8
Maturity (2)
19.8
 20.3
Effective duration to:
 
Next call (2, 3)
10.4
 10.2
Maturity (2, 3)
11.3
 11.2
 At December 31,
 2017 2016
Average annual effective yield(1)
5.60% 5.74%
Average life, in years, to:   
Next call(2)
17.5
 17.6
Maturity(2)
19.1
 19.8
Effective duration to:   
Next call(2, 3)
10.8
 10.4
Maturity(2, 3)
11.5
 11.3
(1)Tax-equivalent basis, where the yield on tax-exempt securities is adjusted to produce a yield equivalent to the pretax yield on taxable securities.
(2)Torchmark calculates the average life and duration of the fixed maturity portfolio two ways:
(a)based on the next call date which is the next call date for callable bonds and the maturity date for noncallable bonds, and
(b)based on the maturity date of all bonds, whether callable or not.
(3)Effective duration is a measure of the price sensitivity of a fixed-income security to a particular change in interest rates.


36
TMK 2017 FORM 10-K

Index to Financial StatementsTable of Contents



Credit Risk Sensitivity. The following tables summarize certain information about the major corporate sectors and security types held in our fixed maturity portfolio at December 31, 20162017 and 2015.2016.

Fixed Maturities by Sector
At December 31, 2017
(Dollar amounts in thousands)
  Below Investment Grade Total Fixed Maturities % of Total Fixed Maturities
  Cost or
Amortized
Cost
Gross
Unrealized
Gains
Gross
Unrealized
Losses
Fair
Value
 Cost or
Amortized
Cost
Gross
Unrealized
Gains
Gross
Unrealized
Losses
Fair
Value
 At Amortized CostAt Fair Value
 
 Corporates:            
 Financial            
 Insurance - life, health, P&C$66,489
$3,896
$(3,650)$66,735
 $2,018,315
$346,364
$(4,588)$2,360,091
 1414
 Banks27,104

(2,727)24,377
 747,249
117,724
(3,007)861,966
 55
 Other financial74,956

(17,661)57,295
 853,583
74,765
(18,524)909,824
 66
 Total financial168,549
3,896
(24,038)148,407
 3,619,147
538,853
(26,119)4,131,881
 2525
 Utilities            
 Electric20,713
1,159

21,872
 1,463,872
306,812
(1,275)1,769,409
 1011
 Gas and water



 520,418
64,726
(120)585,024
 33
 Total utilities20,713
1,159

21,872
 1,984,290
371,538
(1,395)2,354,433
 1314
 Industrial - Energy            
 Pipelines40,590
937
(1,092)40,435
 880,379
117,765
(2,320)995,824
 66
 Exploration and production28,174
1,180
(85)29,269
 527,581
79,784
(2,620)604,745
 44
 Oil field services33,867

(6,004)27,863
 83,722
11,074
(6,004)88,792
 11
 Refiner



 73,106
17,430

90,536
 
 Driller54,561
87
(14,448)40,200
 54,561
87
(14,448)40,200
 
 Total energy157,192
2,204
(21,629)137,767
 1,619,349
226,140
(25,392)1,820,097
 1111
 Industrial - Basic materials            
 Chemicals



 541,785
59,216
(20)600,981
 33
 Metals and mining57,438
7,727

65,165
 387,134
85,105

472,239
 33
 Forestry products and paper



 112,175
16,911

129,086
 11
 Total basic materials57,438
7,727

65,165
 1,041,094
161,232
(20)1,202,306
 77
 Industrial - Consumer, non-cyclical21,334

(4,498)16,836
 1,834,778
192,887
(6,494)2,021,171
 1212
 Other industrials47,136
2,965

50,101
 1,326,051
179,694
(671)1,505,074
 99
 Industrial - Transportation26,443
1,581
(162)27,862
 553,435
90,211
(195)643,451
 34
 Other corporate sectors143,995
5,076
(9,387)139,684
 1,310,445
123,588
(13,236)1,420,797
 98
 Total corporates642,800
24,608
(59,714)607,694
 13,288,589
1,884,143
(73,522)15,099,210
 8990
 Other fixed maturities:            
 Government (U.S., municipal, and foreign)306

(105)201
 1,501,865
147,772
(1,507)1,648,130
 109
 Collateralized debt obligations59,150
20,084
(7,653)71,581
 59,150
20,084
(7,653)71,581
 
 Other asset-backed securities



 144,040
4,790

148,830
 11
 
Mortgage-backed securities(1)




 1,457
118
(1)1,574
 
 Total fixed maturities$702,256
$44,692
$(67,472)$679,476
 $14,995,101
$2,056,907
$(82,683)$16,969,325
 100100
 (1) Includes GNMA's           

37
TMK 2017 FORM 10-K

Table of Contents



Fixed Maturities by Sector
At December 31, 2016
(Dollar amounts in thousands)
  Below Investment Grade Total Fixed Maturities % of Total Fixed Maturities
  Cost or
Amortized
Cost
Gross
Unrealized
Gains
Gross
Unrealized
Losses
Fair
Value
 Cost or
Amortized
Cost
Gross
Unrealized
Gains
Gross
Unrealized
Losses
Fair
Value
 At Amortized CostAt Fair Value
 
 Corporates:            
 Financial            
 Insurance - life, health, P&C$58,400
$1,760
$(4,003)$56,157
 $2,030,188
$217,377
$(16,783)$2,230,782
 1515
 Banks41,558
512
(7,218)34,852
 681,422
71,828
(11,692)741,558
 55
 Other financial74,955

(18,589)56,366
 623,836
39,215
(24,628)638,423
 44
 Total financial174,913
2,272
(29,810)147,375
 3,335,446
328,420
(53,103)3,610,763
 2424
 Utilities            
 Electric21,300
486

21,786
 1,433,742
219,154
(9,384)1,643,512
 1011
 Gas and water



 470,804
31,345
(3,464)498,685
 33
 Total utilities21,300
486

21,786
 1,904,546
250,499
(12,848)2,142,197
 1314
 Industrial - Energy            
 Pipelines45,394
87
(3,297)42,184
 809,300
67,313
(11,431)865,182
 66
 Exploration and production28,954
182
(744)28,392
 531,754
43,009
(11,806)562,957
 44
 Oil field services33,880

(6,483)27,397
 83,753
7,624
(6,483)84,894
 11
 Refiner



 62,977
9,721
(7)72,691
 
 Driller54,642
322
(14,597)40,367
 54,642
322
(14,597)40,367
 
 Total energy162,870
591
(25,121)138,340
 1,542,426
127,989
(44,324)1,626,091
 1111
 Industrial - Basic materials            
 Chemicals



 481,127
21,538
(10,204)492,461
 33
 Metals and mining107,102
491
(2,195)105,398
 389,908
25,247
(2,613)412,542
 33
 Forestry products and paper



 112,702
10,270
(415)122,557
 11
 Total basic materials107,102
491
(2,195)105,398
 983,737
57,055
(13,232)1,027,560
 77
 Industrial - Consumer, non-cyclical



 1,629,706
101,254
(31,938)1,699,022
 1111
 Other industrials80,311
4,066
(1,327)83,050
 1,282,000
115,119
(14,412)1,382,707
 99
 Industrial - Transportation26,675

(2,918)23,757
 494,527
59,067
(4,709)548,885
 44
 Other corporate sectors116,696
1,076
(6,063)111,709
 1,211,166
91,526
(20,256)1,282,436
 98
 Total corporates689,867
8,982
(67,434)631,415
 12,383,554
1,130,929
(194,822)13,319,661
 8888
 Other fixed maturities:            
 Government (U.S., municipal, and foreign)551

(194)357
 1,686,021
129,064
(10,539)1,804,546
 1212
 Collateralized debt obligations60,726
13,062
(10,285)63,503
 60,726
13,062
(10,285)63,503
 
 Other asset-backed securities



 53,786
530
(337)53,979
 
 
Mortgage-backed securities(1)




 3,963
210
(1)4,172
 
 Total fixed maturities$751,144
$22,044
$(77,913)$695,275
 $14,188,050
$1,273,795
$(215,984)$15,245,861
 100100
 (1) Includes GNMA's            

Index to Financial Statements

Fixed Maturities by Sector
At December 31, 2015
(Dollar amounts in thousands)
  Below Investment Grade Total Fixed Maturities % of Total Fixed Maturities
  Cost or
Amortized
Cost
Gross
Unrealized
Gains
Gross
Unrealized
Losses
Fair
Value
 Cost or
Amortized
Cost
Gross
Unrealized
Gains
Gross
Unrealized
Losses
Fair
Value
 At Amortized CostAt Fair Value
 
 Corporates:            
 Financial            
 Insurance - life, health, P&C$58,534
$2,410
$(6,366)$54,578
 $1,912,580
$212,640
$(21,634)$2,103,586
 1415
 Banks41,606
452
(4,781)37,277
 605,957
65,740
(5,942)665,755
 55
 Other financial74,954

(29,916)45,038
 624,532
69,170
(32,086)661,616
 55
 Total financial175,094
2,862
(41,063)136,893
 3,143,069
347,550
(59,662)3,430,957
 2425
 Utilities            
 Electric9,646
1,003

10,649
 1,571,784
194,932
(20,000)1,746,716
 1213
 Gas and water



 438,101
29,334
(8,319)459,116
 33
 Total utilities9,646
1,003

10,649
 2,009,885
224,266
(28,319)2,205,832
 1516
 Industrial - Energy            
 Pipelines45,420

(16,971)28,449
 830,190
29,638
(124,357)735,471
 65
 Exploration and production10,923

(872)10,051
 532,425
15,975
(61,838)486,562
 44
 Oil field services38,962

(11,088)27,874
 87,986
4,226
(11,455)80,757
 11
 Refiner



 63,072
3,937
(1,162)65,847
 1
 Driller5,382

(2,600)2,782
 54,719

(20,289)34,430
 
 Total energy100,687

(31,531)69,156
 1,568,392
53,776
(219,101)1,403,067
 1210
 Industrial - Basic materials            
 Chemicals



 493,634
16,254
(21,339)488,549
 44
 Metals and mining49,891

(27,661)22,230
 402,545
4,389
(90,070)316,864
 32
 Forestry products and paper



 103,599
8,386
(2,952)109,033
 11
 Total basic materials49,891

(27,661)22,230
 999,778
29,029
(114,361)914,446
 87
 Industrial - Consumer, non-cyclical13,499
1,106

14,605
 1,158,828
86,401
(26,917)1,218,312
 99
 Other industrials76,457
1,195
(5,704)71,948
 979,187
64,579
(36,555)1,007,211
 77
 Industrial - Transportation26,771

(7,953)18,818
 571,474
44,720
(26,702)589,492
 44
 Other corporate sectors123,889
1,337
(7,339)117,887
 1,051,925
69,297
(26,376)1,094,846
 88
 Total corporates575,934
7,503
(121,251)462,186
 11,482,538
919,618
(537,993)11,864,163
 8786
 Other fixed maturities:            
 Government (U.S., municipal, and foreign)554

(255)299
 1,684,846
133,117
(16,148)1,801,815
 1313
 Collateralized debt obligations63,662
16,158
(9,438)70,382
 63,662
16,158
(9,438)70,382
 1
 Other asset-backed securities



 16,078
550

16,628
 
 
Mortgage-backed securities(1)




 4,747
290
(1)5,036
 
 Total fixed maturities$640,150
$23,661
$(130,944)$532,867
 $13,251,871
$1,069,733
$(563,580)$13,758,024
 100100
 (1) Includes GNMA's            


At December 31, 2016,2017, fixed maturities had a fair value of $15.2$17.0 billion, compared with $13.8$15.2 billion at December 31, 2015.2016. The net unrealized gain position in the fixed maturity portfolio increased from $506 million at December 31, 2015 to $1.1 billion at December 31, 2016 to $2.0 billion at December 31, 2017, primarily as a result of a decrease in market interest rates.credit spreads. The December 31, 20162017 net unrealized gain consisted of gross unrealized gains of $1.3$2.1 billion offset by $216$83 million of gross unrealized losses, compared with the December 31, 20152016 net unrealized gain which consisted of a gross unrealized gain of $1.1$1.3 billion and a gross unrealized loss of $564$216 million.

Index to Financial Statements

Corporate securities, which consist of bonds and redeemable preferred stocks, were the largest component of the fixed maturity portfolio, representing 88% at both89% of amortized cost and 90% of fair value. The remainder of the portfolio is

38
TMK 2017 FORM 10-K

Table of Contents



invested primarily in securities issued by the U.S. government and U.S. municipalities. The Company holds insignificant amounts in foreign government bonds, collateralized debt obligations, asset-backed securities, and agency mortgage-backed securities. Corporate securities are diversified over a variety of industry sectors and issuers. As shown in the chart above, financial, utility, and energy sectors represented approximately 50% of the portfolio. Corporate securities are diversified over a variety of industry sectors and issuers. At December 31, 2016,2017, the total fixed maturity portfolio consists of 588596 issuers, with 208220 issuers within the financial, utility, and energy sectors.

The net unrealized gain of the fixed maturity portfolio increased $552$916 million from December 31, 2015.2016. The financial, utility, energy, and basic materials sectors experienced increases of $42$237 million, $249$132 million, $117 million, and $129$117 million respectively, in net unrealized gains from December 31, 20152016 to December 31, 2016, while the financial industry decreased $13 million.2017. The fair value of the entire portfolio increased 11% for the period. Over the past year, oil and many other commodity prices have increased meaningfully to the benefit of our holdings in the energy and basic materials sectors. While a sustained period of low prices might lead to some downgrades in ratings, we do not currently anticipate any losses from defaults or write-downs in the foreseeable future.

For more information about our fixed maturity portfolio by component at December 31, 20162017 and 2015,2016, including a discussion of other-than-temporary impairments, an analysis of unrealized investment losses and a schedule of maturities, see Note 4—Investments in the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements.
 
An analysis of the fixed maturity portfolio by a composite rating at December 31, 20162017 is shown in the following table. The composite rating for each security, other than private-placement securities managed by third parties, is the average of the security’s ratings as assigned by Moody’s Investor Service, Standard & Poor’s, Fitch Ratings, and Dominion Bond Rating Service, LTD. The ratings assigned by these four nationally recognized statistical rating organizations are evenly weighted when calculating the average. The composite quality rating is created using a methodology developed by Torchmark Corporation using ratings from the various rating agencies noted above. The composite quality rating is not a Standard & Poor's credit rating. Standard & Poor's does not sponsor, endorse or promote the composite quality rating and shall not be liable for any use of the composite quality rating. Included in the chart below are private placement fixed maturity holdings of $565$591 million at amortized cost ($574613 million at fair value) for which the ratings were assigned by the third party managers.
Fixed Maturities by Rating
At December 31, 20162017
(Dollar amounts in thousands)
Amortized
Cost
 % 
Fair
Value
 %
Amortized
Cost
 % 
Fair
Value
 %
Investment grade:              
AAA$674,277
 5 $690,104
 4$649,559
 4 $689,356
 4
AA1,357,026
 10 1,493,478
 101,095,502
 7 1,222,148
 7
A3,729,598
 26 4,232,327
 284,139,252
 28 4,959,570
 29
BBB+3,359,101
 24 3,617,922
 243,493,309
 23 3,936,939
 23
BBB2,825,950
 20 2,961,864
 193,302,118
 22 3,696,880
 22
BBB-1,490,954
 10 1,554,891
 101,613,105
 11 1,784,956
 11
Investment grade13,436,906
 95 14,550,586
 9514,292,845
 95 16,289,849
 96
Below investment grade:        
BB365,495
 2 347,919
 2413,425
 3 397,063
 2
B253,982
 2 210,905
 2152,454
 1 133,582
 1
Below B131,667
 1 136,451
 1136,377
 1 148,831
 1
Below investment grade751,144
 5 695,275
 5702,256
 5 679,476
 4

$14,188,050
 100 $15,245,861
 100$14,995,101
 100 $16,969,325
 100
 
Of the $14.2$15.0 billion of fixed maturities at amortized cost as of December 31, 2016, $13.42017, $14.3 billion or 95% were investment grade with an average rating of A-. Below-investment-grade bonds were $751$702 million with an average rating of B+. Below-investment-grade bonds at amortized cost were 19%15% of our shareholders’ equity, excluding the effect of

Index to Financial Statements

unrealized gains and losses on fixed maturities as of December 31, 2016.2017. Overall, the total portfolio had a weighted average quality rating of BBB+ based on amortized cost, a decline from A-the same as at the end of 2015.2016.

39
TMK 2017 FORM 10-K

Table of Contents



An analysis of changes in our portfolio of below-investment grade fixed maturities at amortized cost is as follows:

Below-Investment Grade Fixed Maturities
(Dollar amounts in thousands)
Year Ended December 31,Year Ended December 31,
2016 20152017 2016
Balance at beginning of year$640,150
 $560,890
$751,144
 $640,150
Downgrades by rating agencies179,077
 164,968
61,691
 179,077
Upgrades by rating agencies(58,626) (38,821)(55,345) (58,626)
Disposals(13,860) (51,322)(59,420) (13,860)
Write down of other-than-temporarily impaired securities(245) 
Amortization4,403
 4,435
4,431
 4,403
Balance at end of year$751,144
 $640,150
$702,256
 $751,144

Our investment policy regarding fixed maturities is to acquire only investment-grade obligations. Thus, any increases in below investment-grade issues are a result of ratings downgrades of existing holdings. We have no direct investments in commercial or residential mortgages and we are not a party to any credit default swaps or other derivative contracts. We do not participate in securities lending, we have no off-balance sheet investments, and we do not have only an insignificantany exposure to European sovereign debtconsisting of $2 million in German government bonds at December 31, 2016.2017. Our exposure to Puerto Rican obligations is insignificant. On June 23, 2016, the United Kingdom voted to depart the European Union (EU) under the referendum commonly referred to as "Brexit." Although the formal separation from the EU will take time, the nature and extent of the effects on interest rates and economic performance are uncertain at this time. We do not expect an increase in other-than-temporary impairments on our limited exposure related to this event.

Market Risk Sensitivity. Torchmark’s investment securities are exposed to interest rate risk, meaning the effect of changes in financial market interest rates on the current fair value of the company’s investment portfolio. Since 96%95% of the book value of our investments is attributable to fixed maturity investments (and virtually all of these investments are fixed-rate investments), the portfolio is highly subject to market risk. Declines in market interest rates generally result in the fair value of the investment portfolio rising and increases in interest rates cause the fair value to decline. Under normal market conditions, we do not expect to realize these unrealized gains and losses because we have the ability and the intent to hold these investments to maturity. The long-term nature of our insurance policy liabilities and strong cash-flow operating position substantially mitigate any future need to liquidate portions of the portfolio. The increase or decrease in the fair value of insurance liabilities and debt due to increases or decreases in market interest rates largely offsets the impact of rates on the investment portfolio. However, as is permitted by GAAP, these liabilities are not recorded at fair value.
 

Index to Financial Statements

The following table illustrates the market risk sensitivity of our interest-rate sensitive fixed maturity portfolio at December 31, 20162017 and 2015.2016. This table measures the effect of a parallel shift in interest rates (as represented by the U.S. Treasury curve) on the fair value of the fixed maturity portfolio. The data measures the change in fair value arising from an immediate and sustained change in interest rates in increments of 100 basis points.

Market Value of Fixed Maturity Portfolio
(Dollar amounts in thousands)
 At December 31, At December 31,
Change in Interest Rates (1)
 2016 2015 2017 2016
(200) $19,126,303

$17,184,975
 $21,455,515
 $19,126,303
(100) 17,030,458

15,337,923
 19,024,031
 17,030,458
0 15,245,861

13,758,025
 16,969,325
 15,245,861
100 13,716,023

12,397,872
 15,221,207
 13,716,023
200 12,395,635

11,219,241
 13,723,745
 12,395,635

(1) In basis points.

Realized Gains and Losses. Our life and health insurance companies collect premium income from policyholders for the eventual payment of policyholder benefits, sometimes paid many years or even decades in the future. Because benefits are expected to be paid in future periods, premium receipts in excess of current expenses are invested to provide for these obligations. For this reason, we hold a significant investment portfolio as a part of our core insurance operations. This portfolio consists primarily of high-quality fixed maturities containing an adequate yield to provide for the cost of carrying these long-term insurance product obligations. As a result, fixed maturities are generally held for long periods to support the liabilities. Expected yields on these investments are taken into account when setting insurance premium rates and product profitability expectations.
Investments are occasionally sold or called, resulting in a realized gain or loss. These gains and losses generally occur only incidentally, usually as the result of bonds sold because of deterioration in investment quality of issuers or calls by the issuers. Investment losses are also caused by write downs due to impairments. We do not engage in trading investments for profit. Therefore, gains or losses which occur in protecting the portfolio or its yield, or which result from events that are beyond our control, are only secondary to our core insurance operations of providing insurance coverage to policyholders.
Realized gains and losses can be significant in relation to the earnings from core insurance operations, and as a result, can have a material positive or negative impact on net income. The significant fluctuations caused by gains and losses can cause period-to-period trends of net income that are not indicative of historical core operating results or predictive of the future trends of core operations. Accordingly, they have no bearing on core insurance operations or segment results as we view operations. For these reasons, and in line with industry practice, we remove the effects of realized gains and losses when evaluating overall insurance operating results.



40
TMK 2017 FORM 10-K

Index to Financial Statements
Table of Contents



The following table summarizes our tax-effected realized gains (losses) by component for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2016.

Analysis of Realized Gains (Losses), Net of Tax
(Dollar amounts in thousands, except for per share data)
 Year Ended December 31,
 2016 2015 2014
 Amount 
Per Share(1)
 Amount Per Share Amount Per Share
Fixed maturities:           
Sales$(17,209) $(0.14) $(10,813) $(0.09) $10,209
 $0.08
Called or tendered10,290
 0.08
 4,652
 0.04
 4,851
 0.04
Loss on redemption of debt
 
 
 
 (168) 
Other(25) 
 447
 
 414
 
Total$(6,944) $(0.06) $(5,714) $(0.05) $15,306
 $0.12

(1)
Certain current year amounts were prospectively adjusted to give effect to the adoption of ASU 2016-09 related to excess tax benefits from stock compensation as described in Note 1—Significant Accounting Policiesunder "Accounting Pronouncements Adopted in the Current Year."

As described in Note 4—Investments under the caption Other-than-temporary impairments, we have not incurred any write downs in our fixed maturity portfolio as a result of other-than-temporary impairment for the years 2014 through 2016.

FINANCIAL CONDITION
 
Liquidity. Liquidity provides Torchmark with the ability to meet on demand the cash commitments required by its business operations and financial obligations. Our liquidity is primarily derived from three sources: positive cash flow from operations, a portfolio of marketable securities, and a line of credit facility.
 
Insurance Subsidiary Liquidity. The operations of our insurance subsidiaries have historically generated substantial cash inflows in excess of immediate cash needs. Sources of cash flows for the insurance subsidiaries include primarily premium and investment income. Cash outflows from operations include policy benefit payments, commissions, administrative expenses, and taxes. The funds to provide for policy benefits, the majority of which are paid in future periods, are invested primarily in long-term fixed maturities to meet these long-term obligations. In addition to investment income, maturities and scheduled repayments in the investment portfolio are sources of cash. Excess cash available from the insurance subsidiaries’ operations is generally distributed as a dividend to the Parent Company, subject to regulatory restriction. The dividends are generally paid in amounts equal to the subsidiaries’ prior year statutory net income excluding realized capital gains. While the leading source of the excess cash is investment income, due to our high underwriting margins and effective expense control, a significant portion of the excess cash also comes from underwriting income.
 
Parent Company Liquidity. Cash flows from the insurance subsidiaries are used to pay interest and principal repayments on Parent Company debt, operating expenses of the Parent, and Parent Company dividends to Torchmark shareholders. In 2016,2017, the Parent received $438$454 million of cash dividends from its subsidiaries, compared with $438 million in 2016 and $466 million in 2015 and $479 million in 2014.2015. Including transfers from other subsidiaries and after paying debt obligations, shareholder dividends, and other expenses (but before share repurchases), the Parent Company had excess cash flow in 20162017 of approximately $311$330 million, compared with $311 million in 2016 and $358 million in 2015 and $377 million in 2014. 2015.

Parent Company cash flow in excess of its operating requirements is available for other corporate purposes, such as insurance subsidiary capital or financing needs, strategic acquisitions, additional shareholder dividends, or share repurchases. In 2017,2018, it is expected that the Parent Company will receive approximately $450 million in dividends and transfers from subsidiaries and that approximately $325$320 to $335$330 million will be available as excess cash flow. Certain restrictions exist on the payment of these dividends. For more information on the restrictions on the payment of dividends by subsidiaries, see the Restrictions section of Note 12—Shareholders’ Equity in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.. Although these restrictions exist, dividend availability from subsidiaries historically has been more than sufficient for the cash flow needs of the Parent Company.


Index to Financial Statements

Short-Term Borrowings. An additional source of parent company liquidity is a line of credit facility with a group of lenders which allows unsecured borrowings and stand-by letters of credit up to $750 million, which could be extended up to $1 billion. While Torchmark can request the extension, it is not guaranteed. In May 2016, Torchmark amended the facility to extend the maturity date to May 2021. The amendment also allowed for an additional $100 million term loan as discussed under the caption Credit Facility in Note 11—Debt in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements. The facility is further designated as a back-up line of credit for a commercial paper program as well as the stand-by letters of credit as discussed below. As of December 31, 2016,2017, we had available $310$249 million of additional borrowing capacity under this facility, compared with $332$310 million a year earlier. There have been no difficulties in accessing the commercial paper market during the three years ended December 31, 2016.2017.
 
In summary, Torchmark expects to have readily available funds for 20172018 and the foreseeable future to conduct its operations and to maintain target capital ratios in the insurance subsidiaries through internally generated cash flow and the credit facility. In the unlikely event that more liquidity is needed, the Company could generate additional funds through multiple sources including, but not limited to, the issuance of additional debt, additional borrowings on our short-term credit facility, and intercompany borrowing.
 
Consolidated Liquidity. Consolidated net cash inflows provided from continuing operations were $1.4 billion in 2017, compared with $1.2 billion in 2016 compared withand $1.1 billion in 2015 and $1.0 billion in 2014.2015. In addition to cash inflows from operations, our companies received proceeds from maturities, calls, and repayments of fixed maturities in the amount of $489 million in 2017, compared with $236 million in 2016 compared withand $376 million in 2015 and $273 million in 2014.2015.
 
Our cash and short-term investments were $246 million at year-end 2017 and $148 million at year-end 2016 and $116 million at year-end 2015.2016. Additionally, we have a portfolio of marketable fixed securities that are available for sale in the event of an unexpected need. These

41
TMK 2017 FORM 10-K

Table of Contents



securities had a fair value of $15.2$17.0 billion at December 31, 2016.2017. However, our strong cash flows from operations, investment maturities, and the availability of our credit line make any need to sell securities for liquidity unlikely.
 
Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements. As a part of its aforementioned credit facility, Torchmark had outstanding $177 million in stand-by letters of credit at December 31, 20162017 and 2015.2016. These letters are issued among our subsidiaries, one of which is an offshore captive reinsurer, and have no impact on company obligations as a whole. Any future regulatory changes that restrict the use of off-shore captive reinsurers might require Torchmark to obtain third-party financing, which could cause an immaterialinsignificant increase in financing costs.
 
As of December 31, 2016,2017, we had no unconsolidated affiliates and no guarantees of the obligations of third party entities. All of our guarantees were guarantees of the performance of consolidated subsidiaries, as disclosed in Note 15—Commitments and Contingenciesin the .Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

Index to Financial Statements

The following table presents information about future payments under our contractual obligations for the selected periods as of December 31, 2016.2017.
 
Contractual Obligations
(AmountsDollar amounts in thousands)
 
Actual
Liability
 
Total
Payments
 
Less than
One Year
 
One to
Three Years
 
Three to
Five Years
 
More than
Five Years
Actual
Liability
 
Total
Payments
 
Less than
One Year
 
One to
Three Years
 
Three to
Five Years
 
More than
Five Years
Fixed and determinable:                      
Debt—principal(1)
$1,397,640
 $1,416,109
 $264,725
 $303,897
 $86,875
 $760,612
$1,460,268
 $1,475,634
 $328,625
 $308,897
 $227,500
 $610,612
Debt—interest(2)
6,487
 1,202,063
 74,472
 140,312
 92,658
 894,621
6,837
 1,134,369
 73,967
 111,475
 87,988
 860,939
Capital leases
 
 
 
 
 

 
 
 
 
 
Operating leases
 35,807
 8,182
 10,301
 9,523
 7,801

 16,564
 3,483
 6,422
 4,829
 1,830
Purchase obligations(3)56,818
 56,818
 34,162
 21,314
 1,140
 202
33,846
 290,999
 27,326
 12,455
 4,382
 246,836
Postretirement obligations(3)(4)
222,372
 281,429
 20,853
 46,094
 52,600
 161,882
250,595
 292,824
 21,603
 48,572
 55,059
 167,590
Future insurance obligations(4)(5)
12,825,837
 49,794,075
 1,494,814
 2,940,878
 2,890,372
 42,468,011
13,439,472
 52,462,823
 1,584,774
 3,074,789
 2,955,996
 44,847,264
Total$14,509,154
 $52,786,301
 $1,897,208
 $3,462,796
 $3,133,168
 $44,293,129
$15,191,018
 $55,673,213
 $2,039,778
 $3,562,610
 $3,335,754
 $46,735,071
 
(1)
Debt is itemized in Note 11—Debt in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements..
(2)Interest on debt is based on our fixed contractual obligations.
(3)Purchase obligations include various long-term non-cancelable purchase commitments as well as commitments to provide capital for low-income housing tax credit interests.
(4)
Pension obligations are primarily liabilities in trust funds that are calculated in accordance with the terms of the pension plans. They are offset by invested assets in the trusts, which are funded through periodic contributions by Torchmark in a manner which will provide for the settlement of the obligations as they become due. Therefore, our obligations are offset by those assets when reported on Torchmark’s Consolidated Balance Sheets. At December 31, 2016,2017, these pension obligations were $528$603 million, but there were also assets of $329$378 million in the pension entities. The schedule of pension benefit payments covers ten years and is based on the same assumptions used to measure the pension obligations, except there is no interest assumption because the payments are undiscounted. There are also obligations for benefits other than pensions with a liability of $24$26 million. Please refer to Note 9—Postretirement Benefits in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for more information on pension obligations.
(4)(5)Future insurance obligations consist primarily of estimated future contingent benefit payments on policies in force at December 31, 2016.2017. These estimated payments were computed using assumptions for future mortality, morbidity and persistency. The actual amount and timing of such payments may differ significantly from the estimated amounts shown. Management believes that the assets supporting the liability of $12.8$13.4 billion at December 31, 2016,2017, along with future premiums and investment income, will be sufficient to fund all future insurance obligations.

Capital Resources. Torchmark’s capital structure consists of short-term debt (the commercial paper facility described in Note 11—Debt in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements and the current maturity of funded debt), long-term funded debt, and shareholders’ equity. A complete analysis and description of long-term debt issues outstanding is presented in Note 11.
 
Debt: The carrying value of the fundedlong-term debt was $1.1 billion at December 31, 2016, compared with $993 million2017, the same as a year earlier.

On November 17, 2017, Torchmark completed the issuance and sale of $125 million in aggregate principal of Torchmark’s 5.275% Junior Subordinated Debentures due 2057. The debentures were sold in a private placement pursuant to exemptions from the registration requirements of the Securities Act of 1933. The initial purchaser of the

42
TMK 2017 FORM 10-K

Table of Contents



debentures was outside the United States. The net proceeds from the sale of the debentures were $123.3 million, after giving effect to the discount payable to the initial purchaser and expenses of the offering of the debentures. Torchmark used the net proceeds from the offering of the debentures to repay the $125 million outstanding principal of the 5.875% Junior Subordinated Debentures that were due December 15, 2052 and that were callable beginning December 15, 2017.

On April 5, 2016, Torchmark completed the issuance and sale of $300 million aggregate principal amount of Torchmark’s 6.125% Junior Subordinated Debentures due 2056. The debentures were sold pursuant to Torchmark’s shelf registration statement on Form S-3, filed September 25, 2015. The net proceeds from the sale of the debentures were $290 million, after giving effect to the underwriting discount and estimated expenses of the offering of the debentures. Torchmark used the net proceeds from the offering of the debentures to repay the $250 million outstanding principal amount plus accrued interest of $8 million on its 6.375% Senior Notes that were due June 15, 2016. The remaining proceeds were used for general corporate purposes.
 
Subsidiary Capital: OurFor the past several years, our insurance subsidiaries targethave targeted a capital ratio of approximately 325% of Company action levelAction Level regulatory capital under Risk-Based Capital (RBC), standards, a formula designed by insurance regulatory authorities to monitor the adequacy of capital. The 325% target is considered sufficient for the subsidiaries because of their strong reliable cash flows, the relatively low risk of their product mix, and because that ratio is in line with rating agency expectations for Torchmark. At December 31, 2016,2017, our insurance subsidiaries had an aggregate RBC ratio of approximately 324%. Should we experience impairments and/or ratings downgrades within our fixed maturity portfolio314%, a decrease in the future,ratio from the prior year of 324% due to the reduction in deferred tax assets as a result of the Tax Legislation previously discussed in the Results of Operations in this report. Should the NAIC adjust the RBC factors in 2018, as expected, to take into account the lower tax rate, we would expect a further reduction in our consolidated RBC ratio could fall below targeted levels. In such a case, managementfor the year ending December 31, 2018. At this time, target RBC levels for 2018 are yet to be determined pending discussion with regulators and rating agencies. Management believes more than sufficient liquidity exists at the Parent Company to make additional contributions as necessary to maintain the targeted ratio.


Index to Financial Statements

Shareholder's Equity: As noted under the caption SummaryAnalysis of OperationsShare Repurchases in this report, we have an ongoing share repurchase program. Under this program, we acquired 4 million shares at a cost of $325 million in 2017, 5 million shares at a cost of $311 million in 2016, and 6 million shares at a cost offor $359 million in 2015, and 7 million shares for $375 million in 2014.2015. The majority of purchased shares are retired each year. Please refer to the description of our share repurchase program under the caption Summary of Operations in this report.
 
Torchmark has continually increased the quarterly dividend on its common shares over the past three years. In the first quarter of 2014,2015, it was increased to $0.1267$0.135 per share from $0.1133$0.1267 per share. In the first quarter of 2015,2016, it was raised to $0.135$0.14 per share. Finally, in the first quarter of 2016,2017, dividends were raised to $0.14$0.15 per share.
 
Shareholders’ equity was $6.2 billion at December 31, 2017, compared with $4.6 billion at December 31, 2016, compared with $4.1a $1.7 billion at December 31, 2015.or 36% increase. During the twelve months since December 31, 2015,2016, shareholders’ equity was reduced by the $311$325 million in share purchases under the repurchase program and $93$88 million to offset the dilution from stock option exercises. However, it was increased by $550 million$1.5 billion of net income, $874 million of which was attributed to a tax adjustment as a result of the Tax Legislation and $357$870 million of after-tax unrealized gains, inof which $275 million was attributed to a tax adjustment as a result of the fixed maturity portfolio.Tax Legislation.
 
We plan to use excess cash available at the Parent Company as efficiently as possible in the future. Possible uses of excess cash flow include, but are not limited to, share repurchases, acquisitions, increases in shareholder dividends, investment in securities, or repayment of short-term debt. We will determine the best use of excess cash after ensuring that targeted capital levels are maintained in our companies. If market conditions are favorable, we currently expect that share repurchases will continue to be a primary use of those funds.

We maintain a significant available-for-sale fixed maturity portfolio to support our insurance policyholders’ liabilities. Current accounting guidance requires that we revalue our portfolio to fair market value at the end of each accounting period. The period-to-period changes in fair value, net of their associated impact on deferred acquisition costs and income tax, are reflected directly in shareholders’ equity. Changes in the fair value of the portfolio can result from changes in interest rates and liquidity in financial markets. While invested assets are revalued, accounting rules do not permit interest-bearing insurance policy liabilities to be valued at fair value in a consistent manner as that of assets, with changes in value applied directly to shareholders’ equity.

Due to the size of our policy liabilities in relation to our shareholders’ equity, this inconsistency in measurement usually has a material impact on the reported value of shareholders’ equity. If these liabilities were revalued in the same manner

43
TMK 2017 FORM 10-K

Table of Contents



as the assets, the effect on equity would be largely offset. Fluctuations in interest rates cause undue volatility in the period-to-period presentation of our shareholders’ equity, capital structure, and financial ratios which would be essentially removed if interest-bearing liabilities were valued in the same manner as assets. From time to time, the market value of our fixed maturity portfolio may be depressed as a result of bond market illiquidity which could result in a significant decrease in shareholders’ equity. Because of the long-term nature of our fixed maturities and liabilities and the strong cash flows consistently generated by our insurance subsidiaries, we have the intent and ability to hold our securities to maturity. As such, we do not expect to incur losses due to fluctuations in market value of fixed maturities caused by interest rate changes and temporarily illiquid markets. Accordingly, our management, credit rating agencies, lenders, many industry analysts, and certain other financial statement users prefer to remove the effect of this accounting rule when analyzing our balance sheet, capital structure, and financial ratios.
 

Index to Financial Statements

The following tables presenttable presents selected data related to our capital resources. Additionally, the tables presenttable presents the effect of this accounting guidance on relevant line items, so that investors and other financial statement users may determine its impact on Torchmark’s capital structure. Excluding the effect of unrealized gains and losses on the fixed maturity portfolio from shareholders' equity is considered non-GAAP. Below we include the reconciliation to GAAP.
 
Selected Financial Data
(Amounts in thousands except per share and percentage data)
(Dollar amounts in thousands except per share and percentage data)(Dollar amounts in thousands except per share and percentage data)
At December 31, 2016 At December 31, 2015 At December 31, 2014At December 31, 2017 At December 31, 2016 At December 31, 2015
GAAP 
Effect of
Accounting
Rule
Requiring
Revaluation 
(1)
 GAAP 
Effect of
Accounting
Rule
Requiring
Revaluation
 (1)
 GAAP 
Effect of
Accounting
Rule
Requiring
Revaluation 
(1)
GAAP 
Effect of
Accounting
Rule
Requiring
Revaluation 
(1)
 GAAP 
Effect of
Accounting
Rule
Requiring
Revaluation
 (1)
 GAAP 
Effect of
Accounting
Rule
Requiring
Revaluation 
(1)
Fixed maturities$15,245,861
 $1,057,811
 $13,758,024
 $506,153
 $14,493,060
 $1,669,448
$16,969,325
 $1,974,224
 $15,245,861
 $1,057,811
 $13,758,024
 $506,153
Deferred acquisition costs (2)
3,783,158
 (10,281) 3,617,135
 (7,869) 3,457,397
 (16,551)3,958,063
 (10,819) 3,783,158
 (10,281) 3,617,135
 (7,869)
Total assets21,436,087
 1,047,530
 19,853,213
 498,284
 20,272,259
 1,652,897
23,474,985
 1,963,405
 21,436,087
 1,047,530
 19,853,213
 498,284
Short-term debt264,475
 
 490,129
 
 238,398
 
328,067
 
 264,475
 
 490,129
 
Long-term debt1,133,165
 
 743,733
 
 992,130
 
1,132,201
 
 1,133,165
 
 743,733
 
Shareholders’ equity(3)
4,566,861
 680,894
 4,055,552
 323,885
 4,697,466
 1,074,383
6,231,421
 1,551,090
 4,566,861
 680,894
 4,055,552
 323,885
Book value per diluted share(3)
37.76
 5.63
 32.71
 2.62
 36.19
 8.28
52.95
 13.18
 37.76
 5.63
 32.71
 2.62
Debt to capitalization (4)(3)
23.4% (3.1)% 23.3% (1.5)% 20.8% (4.6)%19.0% (4.8)% 23.4% (3.1)% 23.3% (1.5)%
Diluted shares outstanding(3)
120,958
   123,996
   129,812
  117,696
   120,958
   123,996
  
Actual shares outstanding118,031
   122,370
   127,930
  114,593
   118,031
   122,370
  
(1)Amount added to (deducted from) comprehensive income to produce the stated GAAP item.
(2)Includes the value of insurance purchased.
(3)
Due to the adoption of ASU 2016-09 as described in Note 1—Significant Accounting Policiesin the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements under "Accounting Pronouncements Adopted in Current Year", certain current year balances related to excess tax benefits from stock compensation were adjusted prospectively.
(4)Torchmark’s debt covenants require that the effect of the accounting guidance requiring revaluation be removed to determine this ratio. This ratio is computed by dividing total debt by the sum of debt and shareholders’ equity.

FASB guidance provides for an option which, if elected, would permit us to value our interest-bearing policy liabilities and debt at fair value in our Consolidated Balance Sheets. However, unlike the accounting rule which permits us to account for changes in our available-for-sale bond portfolio through other comprehensive income, the guidance requires such changes to be recorded in earnings. Because both the size and duration of the investment portfolio do not match those attributes of our policyholder liabilities and debt, the impact on earnings could be very significant and volatile, causing reported earnings not to be reflective of core results. Therefore, we have not elected this option.
Torchmark’s ratio of earnings before interest and taxes to interest requirements (times interest earned) was 10.8 times in 2017, compared with 10.3 times in 2016 compared withand 11.0 times in 2015 and 11.3 times in 2014 based on continuing operations. This times-interest-earned ratio is computed by dividing interest expense into the sum of pre-tax income from continuing operations and interest expense. A discussion of our interest expense is included in the discussion of financing costs under the caption Investments in this report.
 

44
TMK 2017 FORM 10-K

Table of Contents



Financial Strength Ratings. The financial strength of our major insurance subsidiaries is rated by Standard & Poor’s and A. M. Best. The following chart presents these ratings for our five largest insurance subsidiaries at December 31, 2016.2017.
 
 
Standard
& Poor’s
  
A.M
Best
LibertyAA-  A+ (Superior)
GlobeAA-  A+ (Superior)
United AmericanAA-  A+ (Superior)
American IncomeAA-  A+ (Superior)
Family HeritageNR  A (Excellent)A+ (Superior)
 

Index to Financial Statements

A.M. Best states that it assigns an A+ (Superior) rating to insurance companies that have, in its opinion, a superior ability to meet their ongoing insurance obligations. It assigns an A (Excellent) rating to insurance companies that have, in its opinion, an excellent ability to meet their ongoing insurance obligations.

The AA financial strength rating category is assigned by Standard & Poor’s Corporation (S&P) to those insurers which have very strong capacity to meet its financial commitments which differs from the highest-rated insurers only to a small degree. An insurer rated A has strong capacity to meet its financial commitments but it is somewhat more susceptible to the adverse effects of changes in circumstances and economic conditions than insurers in higher-rated categories. The plus sign (+) or minus sign (-) shows the relative standing within the major rating category.
 
During the fourth quarter of 2016,2017, S&P reviewed our operations and financial outlook. Based on their review, they confirmed our "AA-" financial strength ratings at our insurance subsidiaries and Torchmark Corporation's senior debt "A" credit rating. We intend to maintain adequate capital levels for S&P and any changes to our capital position to maintain such levels are not expected to have any significant impact on our share repurchase program or our financial results in future periods.


OTHER ITEMS
 
Litigation. Torchmark and its subsidiaries are subject to being named as parties to pending or threatened litigation, much of which involves punitive damage claims based upon allegations of agent misconduct at the insurance subsidiaries. Such punitive damage claims may have the potential for significant adverse results since Torchmark and its subsidiaries operate in jurisdictions where large punitive damage awards bearing little or no relation to actual damages continue to be awarded. This bespeaks caution since it is impossible to predict the likelihood or extent of punitive damages that may be awarded if liability is found in any given case. Based upon information presently available, and in light of legal and other factual defenses available to Torchmark and its subsidiaries, contingent liabilities arising from threatened and pending litigation are not presently considered by us to be material. For more information concerning litigation, please refer to Note 15—Commitments and Contingencies in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.


45
TMK 2017 FORM 10-K

Index to Financial Statements
Table of Contents



CRITICAL ACCOUNTING POLICIES
 
Future Policy Benefits: Due to the long-term nature of insurance contracts, our insurance companies are liable for policy benefit payments that will be made in the future. The liability for future policy benefits is determined by standard actuarial procedures common to the life insurance industry. The accounting policies for determining this liability are disclosed in Note 1—Significant Accounting Policiesin the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements..
 
Approximately 86%87% of our liabilities for future policy benefits at December 31, 20162017 were traditional insurance liabilities where the liability is determined as the present value of future benefits less the present value of the portion of the gross premium required to pay for such benefits. The assumptions used in estimating the future benefits for this portion of business are set at the time of contract issue. These assumptions are “locked in” and are not revised for the lifetime of the contracts, except where there is a premium deficiency, as defined in Note 1—Significant Accounting Policies in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statementsunder the caption Future Policy Benefits. Otherwise, variability in the accrual of policy reserve liabilities after policy issuance is caused only by variability of the inventory of in force policies. Torchmark did not have a premium deficiency event for its traditional business during the three years ended December 31, 2016.2017.
 
The remaining portion of liabilities for future policy benefits pertains to business accounted for as deposit business, where the recorded liability is the fund balance attributable to the benefit of policyholders as determined by the policy contract at the financial statement date. Accordingly, there are no assumptions used to determine the future policy benefit liability for deposit business.
 
Deferred Acquisition Costs: Certain costs of acquiring new business are deferred and recorded as an asset. Deferred acquisition costs consist primarily of sales commissions and other underwriting costs related to the successful issuance of a new insurance contract as indicated in Note1 1—Significant Accounting Policies under the caption Deferred Acquisition Costs in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements. Additionally, the cost of acquiring blocks of insurance business or insurance business through the purchase of other companies, known as the value of insurance purchased, is included in deferred acquisition costs. Our policies for accounting for deferred acquisition costs and the associated amortization are reported under the same caption in Note 1.1—Significant Accounting Policies.
 
ApproximatelyOver 99% of our recorded amounts for deferred acquisition costs at December 31, 20162017 were related to traditional products and are being amortized over the premium-paying period in proportion to the present value of actual historic and estimated future gross premiums. The projection assumptions for this business are set at the time of contract issue. These assumptions are “locked-in” at that time and, except where there is a loss recognition issue, are not revised for the lifetime of the contracts. Absent a premium deficiency, variability in amortization after policy issuance is caused only by variability in premium volume. We have not recorded a deferred acquisition cost loss recognition event for assets related to this business for any period in the three years ended December 31, 2016.2017.
 
The remainingLess than 1% of deferred acquisition costs pertain to deposit business for which deferred acquisition costs are amortized over the estimated lives of the contracts in proportion to actual and estimated future gross profits. These contracts are not subject to lock-in. The assumptions must be updated when actual experience or other evidence suggests that earlier estimates should be revised. Revisions related to our deposit business assets have not had a material impact on the amortization of deferred acquisition costs during the three years ended December 31, 2016.2017.
 
Policy Claims and Other Benefits Payable: This liability consists of known benefits currently payable and an estimate of claims that have been incurred but not yet reported to us. The estimate of unreported claims is based on prior experience and is made after careful evaluation of all information available to us. However, the factors upon which these estimates are based can be subject to change from historical patterns. Factors involved include the litigation environment, regulatory mandates, and the introduction of policy types for which claim patterns are not well established, and medical trend rates and medical cost inflation as they affect our health claims. Changes in these estimates, if any, are reflected in the earnings of the period in which the adjustment is made. We believe that the estimates used to produce the liability for claims and other benefits, including the estimate of unsubmitted claims, are the most appropriate under the circumstances. However, there is no certainty that the resulting stated liability will be our ultimate obligation. At this time, we do not expect any change in this estimate to have a material impact on earnings or financial position consistent with our historical experience.

Index to Financial Statements


Valuation of Fixed Maturities: We hold a substantial investment in high-quality fixed maturities to provide for the funding of our future policy contractual obligations over long periods of time. While these securities are generally expected to be held to maturity, they are classified as available for sale and are sold from time to time, primarily to manage risk.

46
TMK 2017 FORM 10-K

Table of Contents



We report this portfolio at fair value. Fair value is the price that we would expect to receive upon sale of the asset in an orderly transaction. The fair value of the fixed maturity portfolio is primarily affected by changes in interest rates in financial markets, having a greater impact on longer-term maturities. Because of the size of our fixed maturity portfolio, small changes in rates can have a significant effect on the portfolio and the reported financial position of the Company. This impact is disclosed in 100 basis point increments under the caption Market Risk Sensitivity in this report. However, as discussed under the caption Financial Condition in this report, we believe these unrealized fluctuations in value have no meaningful impact on our actual financial condition and, as such, we remove them from consideration when viewing our financial position and financial ratios.
 
At times, the values of our fixed maturities can also be affected by illiquidity in the financial markets. Illiquidity would contribute to a spread widening, and accordingly unrealized losses, on many securities that we would expect to be fully recoverable. Even though our fixed maturity portfolio is available for sale, we have the ability and intent to hold the securities until maturity as a result of our strong and stable cash flows generated from our insurance products. Considerable information concerning the policies, procedures, classification levels, and other relevant data concerning the valuation of our fixed maturity investments is presented in Note 1—Significant Accounting Policies and in Note 4—Investments in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements under the captions Fair Value Measurements in both notes.
 
Impairment of Investments: We continually monitor our investment portfolio for investments where fair value has declined below carrying value and that have become impaired in value. While the values of the investments in our portfolio constantly fluctuate due to market conditions, an other-than-temporary impairment charge is recorded only when a security has experienced a decline in fair market value which is deemed to be other than temporary. The policies and procedures that we use to evaluate and account for impairments of investments are disclosed in Note 1—Significant Accounting Policies in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements and the discussions under the captions Investments and Realized Gains and Losses in this report. While every effort is made to make the best estimate of status and value with the information available regarding an other-than-temporary impairment, it is difficult to predict the future prospects of a distressed or impaired security.
 
Defined benefit pension plans: We maintain funded defined benefit plans covering most full-time employees. We also have unfunded nonqualified defined benefit plans covering certain key and other employees. Our obligations under these plans are determined actuarially based on specified actuarial assumptions. In accordance with GAAP, an expense is recorded each year as these pension obligations grow due to the increase in the service period of employees and the interest cost associated with the passage of time. These obligations are offset, at least in part, by the growth in value of the assets in the funded plans. At December 31, 2016,2017, our gross liability under these plans was $528$603 million, but was offset by assets of $329$378 million.

Index to Financial Statements


The actuarial assumptions used in determining our obligations for pensions include employee mortality and turnover, retirement age, the expected return on plan assets, projected salary increases, and the discount rate at which future obligations could be settled. These assumptions have an important effect on the pension obligation. A decrease in the discount rate or rate of return on plan assets will cause an increase in the pension obligation. A decrease in projected salary increases will cause a decrease in this obligation. Small changes in assumptions may cause significant differences in reported results for these plans. For example, a sensitivity analysis is presented below for the impact of change in the discount rate and the long-term rate of return on assets assumed on our defined benefit pension plans expense for the year 20162017 and projected benefit obligation as of December 31, 2016.2017.

47
TMK 2017 FORM 10-K

Table of Contents



Pension Assumptions
(Dollar amounts in thousands)
 
Assumption % Change 
Impact on
Expense
 Impact on Projected Benefit Obligation % Change 
Impact on
Expense
 Impact on Projected Benefit Obligation
   (Dollars in Thousands)    
Discount Rate: (1)
      
Discount Rate(1):
      
Increase 0.25
 $(2,575) $(19,884) 0.25
 $(2,890) $(23,697)
Decrease (0.25) 2,712
 21,084
 (0.25) 3,054
 25,181
Expected Return: (2)
      
Expected Return(2):
      
Increase 0.25
 (842)   0.25
 (923)  
Decrease (0.25) 842
   (0.25) 923
  
 
(1)The discount rate was 4.64%4.27% for 20162017 expense and 4.27%3.75% for the projected benefit obligation at December 31, 2016.2017.
(2)The expected return rate assumed was 7.19%6.96%.

The Company determines mortality assumptions through the use of published mortality tables that reflect broad-based studies of mortality and published longevity improvement scales. During 2014, the Company revised the mortality assumptions based on an evaluation of a new mortality table and longevity scale released by the Society of Actuaries. The change in these assumptions added approximately $26 million to the projected benefit obligation as of December 31, 2014.
 
The criteria used to determine the primary assumptions are discussed in Note 9—Postretirement Benefitsin the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.. While we have used our best efforts to determine the most reliable assumptions, given the information available from company experience, economic data, independent consultants and other sources, we cannot be certain that actual results will be the same as expected. The assumptions are reviewed annually and revised, if necessary, based on more current information available to us. Note 99—Postretirement Benefits also contains information about pension plan assets, investment policies, and other related data.

48
TMK 2017 FORM 10-K

Index to Financial Statements
Table of Contents



CAUTIONARY STATEMENTS
 
We caution readers regarding certain forward-looking statements contained in the foregoing discussion and elsewhere in this document, and in any other statements made by us or on our behalf whether or not in future filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission. Any statement that is not a historical fact, or that might otherwise be considered an opinion or projection concerning us or our business, whether express or implied, is meant as and should be considered a forward-looking statement. Such statements represent our opinions concerning future operations, strategies, financial results or other developments.
 
Forward-looking statements are based upon estimates and assumptions that are subject to significant business, economic and competitive uncertainties, many of which are beyond our control. If these estimates or assumptions prove to be incorrect, the actual results may differ materially from the forward-looking statements made on the basis of such estimates or assumptions. Whether or not actual results differ materially from forward-looking statements may depend on numerous foreseeable and unforeseeable events or developments, which may be national in scope, related to the insurance industry generally, or applicable to Torchmark specifically. Such events or developments could include, but are not necessarily limited to:
 
(1)Changes in lapse rates and/or sales of our insurance policies as well as levels of mortality, morbidity, and utilization of healthcare services that differ from our assumptions;
(2)Federal and state legislative and regulatory developments, particularly those impacting taxes and changes to the federal Medicare program that would affect Medicare Supplement;
(3)Market trends in the senior-aged health care industry that provide alternatives to traditional Medicare, such as health maintenance organizations (HMOs) and other managed care or private plans, and that could affect the sales of traditional Medicare Supplement insurance;
(4)Interest rate changes that affect product sales and/or investment portfolio yield;
(5)General economic, industry sector or individual debt issuers’ financial conditions that may affect the current market value of securities that we own, or that may impair issuers’ ability to pay interest due us on those securities;
(6)Changes in pricing competition;
(7)Litigation results;
(8)Levels of administrative and operational efficiencies that differ from our assumptions;
(9)Our inability to obtain timely and appropriate premium rate increases for health insurance policies due to regulatory delay;
(10)The customer response to new products and marketing initiatives; and
(11)Reported amounts in the financial statements which are based on our estimates and judgments which may differ from the actual amounts ultimately realized.
Readers are also directed to consider other risks and uncertainties described in our other documents on file with the Securities and Exchange Commission.

 
Item 7A. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk
 
Information required by this item is found under the heading Market Risk Sensitivity in Item 7 of this report.

49
TMK 2017 FORM 10-K

Index to Financial Statements
Table of Contents



Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data

Consolidated Financial Statements Index
 Page
  
 

50
TMK 2017 FORM 10-K

Index to Financial Statements
Table of Contents



REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
 
To the shareholders and the Board of Directors and Shareholders of
Torchmark Corporation (McKinney, Texas)
McKinney, Texas
Opinion on the Financial Statements
We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Torchmark Corporation and subsidiaries (Torchmark)(the “Company”) as of December 31, 20162017 and 2015, and2016, the related consolidated statements of operations, comprehensive income, shareholders’ equity, and cash flows, for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2016. Our audits also included2017, and the financial statementrelated notes and the schedules listed in the Index at Item 15. These financial statements and financial statement schedules are15 (collectively referred to as the responsibility of Torchmark’s management. Our responsibility is to express an“financial statements”). In our opinion, on the financial statements present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of the Company as of December 31, 2017 and financial statement schedules based on our audits.2016, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2017, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.
We conducted our auditshave also audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). (PCAOB), the Company’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2017, based on criteria established in Internal Control - Integrated Framework (2013) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission and our report dated February 26, 2018, expressed an unqualified opinion on the Company’s internal control over financial reporting.
Basis for Opinion
These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Company’s financial statements based on our audits. We are a public accounting firm registered with the PCAOB and are required to be independent with respect to the Company in accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.
We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includesmisstatement, whether due to error or fraud. Our audits included performing procedures to assess the risks of material misstatement of the financial statements, whether due to error or fraud, and performing procedures that respond to those risks. Such procedures included examining, on a test basis, evidence supportingregarding the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An auditOur audits also includes assessingincluded evaluating the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the financial statement presentation.statements. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, such consolidated financial statements present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Torchmark Corporation and subsidiaries as of December 31, 2016 and 2015, and the results of their operations and their cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2016, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. Also, in our opinion, such financial statement schedules, when considered in relation to the basic consolidated financial statements taken as a whole, present fairly, in all material respects, the information set forth therein.
We have also audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), Torchmark’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2016, based on the criteria established in Internal Control-Integrated Framework(2013) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission and our report dated February 27, 2017 expressed an unqualified opinion on Torchmark’s internal control over financial reporting.




/s/ DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP

Dallas, Texas
February 27, 201726, 2018

We have served as the Company's auditor since 1999.

51
TMK 2017 FORM 10-K

Index to Financial Statements
Table of Contents



TORCHMARK CORPORATION
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(Dollar amounts in thousands, except per share data)
 
December 31,December 31,
2016 20152017 2016
Assets:      
Investments:      
Fixed maturities-available for sale, at fair value (amortized cost: 2016—$14,188,050;
2015—$13,251,871)
$15,245,861
 $13,758,024
Fixed maturities-available for sale, at fair value (amortized cost: 2017—$14,995,101;
2016—$14,188,050)
$16,969,325
 $15,245,861
Policy loans507,975
 492,462
529,529
 507,975
Other long-term investments53,852
 38,438
108,559
 53,852
Short-term investments72,040
 54,766
127,071
 72,040
Total investments15,879,728
 14,343,690
17,734,484
 15,879,728
Cash76,163
 61,383
118,563
 76,163
Accrued investment income223,148
 209,915
233,453
 223,148
Other receivables384,454
 344,552
391,775
 384,454
Deferred acquisition costs3,783,158
 3,617,135
3,958,063
 3,783,158
Goodwill441,591
 441,591
441,591
 441,591
Other assets520,313
 522,104
528,536
 520,313
Assets related to discontinued operations127,532
 312,843
68,520
 127,532
Total assets$21,436,087
 $19,853,213
$23,474,985
 $21,436,087
Liabilities:      
Future policy benefits$12,825,837
 $12,245,811
$13,439,472
 $12,825,837
Unearned and advance premiums64,017
 67,021
61,430
 64,017
Policy claims and other benefits payable299,565
 272,898
333,294
 299,565
Other policyholders' funds96,993
 95,988
97,635
 96,993
Total policy liabilities13,286,412
 12,681,718
13,931,831
 13,286,412
Current and deferred income taxes payable1,743,990
 1,450,888
1,312,002
 1,743,990
Other liabilities413,760
 380,158
489,609
 413,760
Short-term debt264,475
 490,129
328,067
 264,475
Long-term debt (estimated fair value: 2016—$1,233,019; 2015—$856,291)1,133,165
 743,733
Long-term debt (estimated fair value: 2017—$1,228,392; 2016—$1,233,019)1,132,201
 1,133,165
Liabilities related to discontinued operations27,424
 51,035
49,854
 27,424
Total liabilities16,869,226
 15,797,661
17,243,564
 16,869,226
Commitments and Contingencies (Note 15)

 

 
Shareholders' equity:      
Preferred stock, par value $1 per share—Authorized 5,000,000 shares; outstanding: 0 in 2016 and 2015
 
Common stock, par value $1 per share—Authorized 320,000,000 shares;
outstanding: (2016—127,218,183 issued, less 9,187,075 held in treasury and
2015—130,218,183 issued, less 7,848,231 held in treasury)
127,218
 130,218
Preferred stock, par value $1 per share—Authorized 5,000,000 shares; outstanding: 0 in 2017 and 2016
 
Common stock, par value $1 per share—Authorized 320,000,000 shares; outstanding: (2017—124,218,183 issued, less 9,625,104 held in treasury and 2016—127,218,183 issued, less 9,187,075 held in treasury)124,218
 127,218
Additional paid-in capital490,421
 482,284
508,476
 490,421
Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss)577,574
 231,947
1,424,274
 577,574
Retained earnings3,890,798
 3,614,369
4,806,208
 3,890,798
Treasury stock(519,150) (403,266)(631,755) (519,150)
Total shareholders' equity4,566,861
 4,055,552
Total liabilities and shareholders' equity$21,436,087
 $19,853,213
Total shareholders’ equity6,231,421
 4,566,861
Total liabilities and shareholders’ equity$23,474,985
 $21,436,087


See accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

52
TMK 2017 FORM 10-K

Index to Financial Statements
Table of Contents



TORCHMARK CORPORATION
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
(AmountsDollar amounts in thousands, except per share data)
Year Ended December 31,Year Ended December 31,
2016 2015 20142017 2016 2015
Revenue:          
Life premium$2,189,333
 $2,073,065
 $1,966,300
$2,306,547
 $2,189,333
 $2,073,065
Health premium947,663
 925,520
 869,440
976,373
 947,663
 925,520
Other premium38
 135
 400
15
 38
 135
Total premium3,137,034
 2,998,720
 2,836,140
3,282,935
 3,137,034
 2,998,720
          
Net investment income806,903
 773,951
 758,286
847,885
 806,903
 773,951
Realized investment gains (losses)(10,683) (8,791) 23,548
23,611
 (10,683) (8,791)
Other income1,375
 2,185
 2,121
1,142
 1,375
 2,185
Total revenue3,934,629
 3,766,065
 3,620,095
4,155,573
 3,934,629
 3,766,065
          
Benefits and expenses:          
Life policyholder benefits1,479,272
 1,374,608
 1,301,562
1,558,261
 1,479,272
 1,374,608
Health policyholder benefits612,725
 602,610
 559,817
633,778
 612,725
 602,610
Other policyholder benefits36,751
 38,994
 42,005
35,836
 36,751
 38,994
Total policyholder benefits2,128,748
 2,016,212
 1,903,384
2,227,875
 2,128,748
 2,016,212
          
Amortization of deferred acquisition costs469,063
 445,625
 415,914
490,403
 469,063
 445,625
Commissions, premium taxes, and non-deferred acquisition expenses249,174
 237,541
 222,463
264,860
 249,174
 237,541
Other operating expense232,064
 223,858
 217,531
257,255
 232,064
 223,858
Interest expense83,345
 76,642
 76,126
84,532
 83,345
 76,642
Total benefits and expenses3,162,394
 2,999,878
 2,835,418
3,324,925
 3,162,394
 2,999,878
          
Income before income taxes772,235
 766,187
 784,677
830,648
 772,235
 766,187
Income taxes(1)
(232,645) (249,894) (256,603)
Income tax benefit (expense)627,615
 (232,645) (249,894)
Income from continuing operations539,590
 516,293
 528,074
1,458,263
 539,590
 516,293

          
Discontinued operations:          
Income from discontinued operations, net of tax10,189
 10,807
 14,865
Income (loss) from discontinued operations, net of tax(3,769) 10,189
 10,807
Net income$549,779
 $527,100
 $542,939
$1,454,494
 $549,779
 $527,100

          
Basic net income per common share:          
Continuing operations$4.50
 $4.13
 $4.04
$12.53
 $4.50
 $4.13
Discontinued operations0.08
 0.08
 0.11
(0.03) 0.08
 0.08
Total basic net income per common share$4.58
 $4.21
 $4.15
$12.50
 $4.58
 $4.21

          
Diluted net income per common share:(1)
          
Continuing operations$4.41
 $4.07
 $3.98
$12.26
 $4.41
 $4.07
Discontinued operations0.08
 0.09
 0.11
(0.04) 0.08
 0.09
Total diluted net income per common share$4.49
 $4.16
 $4.09
$12.22
 $4.49
 $4.16
 
(1)
Certain current year amounts were prospectively adjusted to give effect to the adoption of ASU 2016-09 related to excess tax benefits from stock compensation as described in Note 1—Significant Accounting Policiesunder "Accounting Pronouncements Adopted in the Current Year."

See accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

53
TMK 2017 FORM 10-K

Index to Financial Statements
Table of Contents



TORCHMARK CORPORATION
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME
(AmountsDollar amounts in thousands)
 
Year Ended December 31,Year Ended December 31,
2016 2015 20142017 2016 2015
Net income$549,779
 $527,100
 $542,939
$1,454,494
 $549,779
 $527,100
          
Other comprehensive income (loss):
 
 
     
Unrealized investment gains (losses):
 
 
     
Unrealized gains (losses) on securities:

 

 

     
Unrealized holding gains (losses) arising during period544,886
 (1,163,417) 1,312,548
950,088
 544,886
 (1,163,417)
Reclassification adjustment for (gains) losses on securities included in net income10,645
 9,478
 (23,170)(34,954) 10,645
 9,478
Reclassification adjustment for amortization of (discount) premium(4,185) (6,346) (8,621)(47) (4,185) (6,346)
Foreign exchange adjustment on securities recorded at fair value312
 (3,010) (1,567)1,326
 312
 (3,010)
Unrealized gains (losses) on securities551,658
 (1,163,295) 1,279,190
916,413
 551,658
 (1,163,295)

 
 
     
Unrealized gains (losses) on other investments:

 

 

     
Unrealized holding gains (losses) arising during period2,503
 (1,635) 4,473
5,008
 2,503
 (1,635)
Reclassification adjustment for (gains) losses included in net income(360) (1,102) (601)
 (360) (1,102)
Unrealized gains (losses) on other investments2,143
 (2,737) 3,872
5,008
 2,143
 (2,737)
Total unrealized investment gains (losses)553,801
 (1,166,032) 1,283,062
921,421
 553,801
 (1,166,032)
Less applicable (taxes) benefits(193,820) 408,092
 (448,985)(322,553) (193,820) 408,092
Unrealized gains (losses) on investments, net of tax359,981
 (757,940) 834,077
598,868
 359,981
 (757,940)
          
Unrealized gains (losses) attributable to deferred acquisition costs(2,412) 8,682
 (6,200)(538) (2,412) 8,682
Less applicable (taxes) benefits845
 (3,039) 2,170
188
 845
 (3,039)
Unrealized gains (losses) attributable to deferred acquisition costs, net of tax(1,567) 5,643
 (4,030)(350) (1,567) 5,643
          
Foreign exchange translation adjustments, other than securities2,178
 (20,651) (10,770)11,389
 2,178
 (20,651)
Less applicable (taxes) benefits(838) 6,892
 3,290
(2,937) (838) 6,892
Foreign exchange translation adjustments, other than securities, net of tax1,340
 (13,759) (7,480)8,452
 1,340
 (13,759)

 
 
     
Pension adjustments:

 

 

     
Amortization of pension costs10,168
 14,586
 10,285
12,436
 10,168
 14,586
Plan amendments
 (2,104) 

 
 (2,104)
Experience gain (loss)(31,902) (11,632) (65,817)(31,933) (31,902) (11,632)
Pension adjustments(21,734) 850
 (55,532)(19,497) (21,734) 850
Less applicable (taxes) benefits7,607
 (299) 19,436
6,827
 7,607
 (299)
Pension adjustments, net of tax(14,127) 551
 (36,096)(12,670) (14,127) 551
          
Other comprehensive income (loss)345,627
 (765,505) 786,471
594,300
 345,627
 (765,505)
Comprehensive income (loss)$895,406
 $(238,405) $1,329,410
$2,048,794
 $895,406
 $(238,405)
 

See accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

54
TMK 2017 FORM 10-K

Index to Financial Statements
Table of Contents



TORCHMARK CORPORATION
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY
(AmountsDollar amounts in thousands, except per share data)
 
Preferred
Stock
 
Common
Stock
 
Additional
Paid-in
Capital
 
Accumulated
Other
Comprehensive
Income (Loss)
 
Retained
Earnings
 
Treasury
Stock
 
Total
Shareholders’
Equity
Preferred
Stock
 
Common
Stock
 
Additional
Paid-in
Capital
 
Accumulated
Other
Comprehensive
Income (Loss)
 
Retained
Earnings
 
Treasury
Stock
 
Total
Shareholders’
Equity
Year Ended December 31, 2014             
Balance at January 1, 2014$
 $151,218
 $462,058
 $210,981
 $3,495,533
 $(543,448) $3,776,342
Comprehensive income (loss)
 
 
 786,471
 542,939
 
 1,329,410
Common dividends declared
($.51 per share)

 
 
 
 (65,998) 
 (65,998)
Acquisition of treasury stock
 
 
 
 
 (449,308) (449,308)
Stock-based compensation
 
 31,315
 
 362
 526
 32,203
Exercise of stock options
 
 18,524
 
 (22,641) 78,934
 74,817
Retirement of treasury stock
 (17,000) (54,284) 
 (573,349) 644,633
 
Balance at December 31, 2014
 134,218
 457,613
 997,452
 3,376,846
 (268,663) 4,697,466
             
Year Ended December 31, 2015                          
Balance at January 1, 2015$
 $134,218
 $457,613
 $997,452
 $3,376,846
 $(268,663) $4,697,466
Comprehensive income (loss)
 
 
 (765,505) 527,100
 
 (238,405)
 
 
 (765,505) 527,100
 
 (238,405)
Common dividends declared
($.54 per share)

 
 
 
 (67,182) 
 (67,182)
 
 
 
 (67,182) 
 (67,182)
Acquisition of treasury stock
 
 
 
 
 (418,526) (418,526)
 
 
 
 
 (418,526) (418,526)
Stock-based compensation
 
 21,813
 
 (2,132) 8,983
 28,664

 
 21,813
 
 (2,132) 8,983
 28,664
Exercise of stock options
 
 17,577
 
 (36,322) 72,280
 53,535

 
 17,577
 
 (36,322) 72,280
 53,535
Retirement of treasury stock
 (4,000) (14,719) 
 (183,941) 202,660
 

 (4,000) (14,719) 
 (183,941) 202,660
 
Balance at December 31, 2015
 130,218
 482,284
 231,947
 3,614,369
 (403,266) 4,055,552

 130,218
 482,284
 231,947
 3,614,369
 (403,266) 4,055,552
                          
Year Ended December 31, 2016                          
Comprehensive income (loss)
 
 
 345,627
 549,779
 
 895,406

 
 
 345,627
 549,779
 
 895,406
Common dividends declared
($.56 per share)

 
 
 
 (66,968) 
 (66,968)
 
 
 
 (66,968) 
 (66,968)
Acquisition of treasury stock
 
 
 
 
 (404,784) (404,784)
 
 
 
 
 (404,784) (404,784)
Stock-based compensation
 
 19,659
 
 (2,224) 8,891
 26,326

 
 19,659
 
 (2,224) 8,891
 26,326
Exercise of stock options(1)

 
 

 
 (53,845) 115,174
 61,329
Exercise of stock options
 
 

 
 (53,845) 115,174
 61,329
Retirement of treasury stock
 (3,000) (11,522) 
 (150,313) 164,835
 

 (3,000) (11,522) 
 (150,313) 164,835
 
Balance at December 31, 2016$
 $127,218
 $490,421
 $577,574
 $3,890,798
 $(519,150) $4,566,861

 127,218
 490,421
 577,574
 3,890,798
 (519,150) 4,566,861
             
Year Ended December 31, 2017             
Comprehensive income (loss)
 
 
 594,300
 1,454,494
 
 2,048,794
Common dividends declared
($.60 per share)

 
 
 
 (69,494) 
 (69,494)
Acquisition of treasury stock
 
 
 
 
 (412,989) (412,989)
Stock-based compensation
 
 30,190
 
 (606) 7,450
 37,034
Exercise of stock options
 
 

 
 (38,333) 99,548
 61,215
Reclassifications, Tax Reform(1)

 
 
 252,400
 (252,400) 

 
Retirement of treasury stock
 (3,000) (12,135) 
 (178,251) 193,386
 
Balance at December 31, 2017$
 $124,218
 $508,476
 $1,424,274
 $4,806,208
 $(631,755) $6,231,421

(1)
Certain current year amountsIncome tax effects of certain items were prospectively adjustedreclassified from accumulated other comprehensive income to give effectretained earnings to theremove stranded tax effects as a result of early adoption of ASU 2016-09 related to excess tax benefits2018-02, Income Statement—Reporting Comprehensive Income (Topic 220): Reclassification of Certain Tax Effects from stock compensation as describedAccumulated Other Comprehensive Income. See further discussion in Note 1—Significant Accounting Policiesunder "Accounting Pronouncements Adopted in the Current Year.".














See accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

55
TMK 2017 FORM 10-K

Index to Financial Statements
Table of Contents



TORCHMARK CORPORATION
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(AmountsDollar amounts in thousands)
Year Ended December 31,Year Ended December 31,
2016 2015 20142017 2016 2015
Net income$549,779
 $527,100
 $542,939
$1,454,494
 $549,779
 $527,100
Adjustments to reconcile net income from continuing operations to cash provided from continuing operations:          
(Income) from discontinued operations, net of income taxes(10,189) (10,807) (14,865)
Increase in future policy benefits645,844
 631,202
 585,632
Loss (Income) from discontinued operations, net of income taxes3,769
 (10,189) (10,807)
Increase (decrease) in future policy benefits687,407
 645,844
 631,202
Increase (decrease) in other policy benefits24,668
 14,609
 12,521
31,784
 24,668
 14,609
Deferral of policy acquisition costs(635,318) (612,181) (562,245)(660,134) (635,318) (612,181)
Amortization of deferred policy acquisition costs469,063
 445,625
 415,914
490,403
 469,063
 445,625
Change in current and deferred income taxes(1)
152,210
 103,558
 102,720
(700,660) 152,210
 103,558
Realized (gains) losses on sale of investments and properties10,683
 8,791
 (23,548)(23,611) 10,683
 8,791
Other, net20,079
 13,985
 (38,354)67,933
 20,079
 13,985
Net cash provided from (used for) continuing operations1,226,819
 1,121,882
 1,020,714
1,351,385
 1,226,819
 1,121,882
Net cash provided from (used for) discontinued operations171,889
 (1,832) (156,006)77,673
 171,889
 (1,832)
Cash provided from (used for) operating activities1,398,708
 1,120,050
 864,708
1,429,058
 1,398,708
 1,120,050
          
Cash provided from (used for) investing activities:          
Investments sold or matured:          
Fixed maturities available for sale—sold340,434
 226,792
 109,024
67,246
 340,434
 226,792
Fixed maturities available for sale—matured, called, and repaid236,353
 376,158
 273,223
488,843
 236,353
 376,158
Other long-term investments1,217
 3,740
 1,495
3,534
 1,217
 3,740
Total investments sold or matured578,004
 606,690
 383,742
559,623
 578,004
 606,690
Acquisition of investments:          
Fixed maturities—available for sale(1,530,053) (1,070,908) (704,993)(1,314,609) (1,530,053) (1,070,908)
Other long-term investments(20,444) (31,707) 
(55,096) (20,444) (31,707)
Total investments acquired(1,550,497) (1,102,615) (704,993)(1,369,705) (1,550,497) (1,102,615)
Net increase in policy loans(15,513) (20,353) (23,222)
Net (increase) decrease in policy loans(21,554) (15,513) (20,353)
Net (increase) decrease in short-term investments(17,274) (38,884) 61,008
(55,031) (17,274) (38,884)
Additions to properties(25,162) (36,957) (19,367)(20,285) (25,162) (36,957)
Sales of properties90
 
 8,752
Sale of other assets18
 90
 
Investments in low-income housing interests(32,084) (41,231) (56,083)(19,890) (32,084) (41,231)
Cash provided from (used for) investing activities(1,062,436) (633,350) (350,163)(926,824) (1,062,436) (633,350)
          
Cash provided from (used for) financing activities:          
Issuance of common stock61,329
 35,958
 56,294
61,215
 61,329
 35,958
Cash dividends paid to shareholders(66,931) (66,899) (65,006)(68,831) (66,931) (66,899)
Repayment of debt(250,000) 
 
(126,875) (250,000) 
Proceeds from issuance of debt400,000
 
 
125,000
 400,000
 
Payment for debt issuance costs(9,638) 
 
(1,661) (9,638) 
Net borrowing (repayment) of commercial paper22,224
 1,978
 9,328
61,092
 22,224
 1,978
Excess tax benefit from stock option exercises(1)

 17,577
 18,524

 
 17,577
Acquisition of treasury stock(404,784) (418,526) (449,308)(412,989) (404,784) (418,526)
Net receipts (payments) from deposit-type product(71,991) (95,793) (69,792)(90,932) (71,991) (95,793)
Cash provided from (used for) financing activities(319,791) (525,705) (499,960)(453,981) (319,791) (525,705)
     
Effect of foreign exchange rate changes on cash(1,701)
34,369
 14,491
(5,853)
(1,701) 34,369
Increase (decrease) in cash14,780
 (4,636) 29,076
42,400
 14,780
 (4,636)
Cash at beginning of year61,383
 66,019
 36,943
76,163
 61,383
 66,019
Cash at end of year$76,163

$61,383

$66,019
$118,563

$76,163

$61,383
(1)
Certain current year amounts were prospectively adjusted to give effect to the adoption of ASU 2016-09 related to excess tax benefits from stock compensation as described in Note 1—Significant Accounting Policiesunder "Accounting Pronouncements Adopted in the Current Year."



See accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

56
TMK 2017 FORM 10-K

Index to Financial Statements
Table of Contents



TORCHMARK CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Dollar amounts in thousands, except per share data)
 
Note 1—Significant Accounting Policies
 
Business: Torchmark Corporation (Torchmark or alternatively, the Company) through its wholly-owned subsidiaries provides a variety of life and supplemental health insurance products and annuities to a broad base of customers. Torchmark is organized into four reportable segments: life insurance, health insurance, annuity, and investment.
 
Basis of Presentation: The accompanying consolidated financial statements have been prepared in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (GAAP), under guidance issued by the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB). The preparation of financial statements in conformity with GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates.
 
Principles of Consolidation: The consolidated financial statements include the results of Torchmark and its wholly-owned subsidiaries. All intercompany accounts and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation. When Torchmark acquires a subsidiary or a block of business, the assets acquired and the liabilities assumed are measured at fair value at the acquisition date. Any excess of acquisition cost over the fair value of net assets is recorded as goodwill. Expenses incurred to effect the acquisition are charged to earnings as of the acquisition date. Upon acquisition, the accounts and results of operations are consolidated as of and subsequent to the acquisition date.
 
Torchmark accounts for its variable interest entities (VIEs) under accounting guidance which clarifies the definition of a variable interest and the instructions for consolidating VIEs. Only primary beneficiaries are required or allowed to consolidate VIEs. Therefore, a company may have voting control of a VIE, but if it is not the primary beneficiary, it is not permitted to consolidate the VIE. As further described under the caption Low-Income Housing Tax Credit Interests below in this note, Torchmark holds passive interests in limited partnerships which provide investment returns through the provision of tax benefits (principally from the transfer of federal or state tax credits related to federal low-income housing). These interests are considered to be VIEs. They are not consolidated because the Company has no power to control the activities that most significantly affect the economic performance of these entities and therefore the Company is not the primary beneficiary of any of these interests. Torchmark’s involvement is limited to its limited partnership interest in the entities. Torchmark has not provided any other financial support to the entities beyond its commitments to fund its limited partnership interests, and there are no arrangements or agreements with any of the interests to provide other financial support. The maximum loss exposure relative to these interests is limited to their carrying value.
 
Discontinued Operations: When a component of Torchmark’s business is sold or expected to be sold during the ensuing year, Torchmark considers whether the criteria of ASC 205-20, Discontinued Operations, have been met, which includes evaluating if the disposal of a component represents a strategic shift that has, or will have, a major effect on the Company. If the disposal meets the criteria for discontinued operations, the assets and liabilities are segregated and recorded in the Consolidated Balance Sheets as "Assets and Liabilities related to discontinued operations" for all periods presented. If the carrying amount of the business exceeds its estimated fair value, a loss is recognized. The results of operations for the discontinued component are reported in "Income from discontinued operations, net of tax" in the Consolidated Statements of Operations for current and prior periods. Discontinued operations are reported commencing in the period in which the business is either disposed of or meets the accounting criteria for discontinued operations, including any gain or loss recognized on the sale or adjustment of the carrying amount to the estimated fair value less cost to sell.

As discussed in further detail in Note 6—Discontinued Operations, Torchmark sold one of its operating segments, Medicare Part D during 2016. The financial results of this business are excluded from Torchmark's continuing operations including the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements, other than Note 2—Statutory Accounting and Note 6—Discontinued Operations.
 
Investments: Torchmark classifies all of its fixed maturity investments, which include bonds and redeemable preferred stocks, as available for sale. Investments classified as available for sale are carried at fair value with unrealized gains and losses, net of deferred taxes, reflected directly in accumulated other comprehensive income. Policy loans are

57
TMK 2017 FORM 10-K

Index to Financial StatementsTable of Contents

TORCHMARK CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)
(Dollar amounts in thousands, except per share data)
 
Note 1—Significant Accounting Policies (continued)

carried at unpaid principal balances. Other long-term investments include equity securities, real estate, mortgage participations, and limited partnerships. Investments in equity securities, which include common and nonredeemable preferred stocks, are reported at fair value with unrealized gains and losses, net of deferred taxes, reflected directly in accumulated other comprehensive income. Investments in real estate are reported at cost less allowances for depreciation. Depreciation is calculated on the straight-line method. Mortgage participations, a type of investment where the mortgage loan is shared among investors, are accounted for as financing receivables. Investments in limited partnerships are primarily accounted for using the cost method of accounting as Torchmark's partnership interest is minor sinceas Torchmark lacks the ability to exercise significant influence over the partnership's operating and financial policies. The Company considers its cost method investments for impairment when the carrying value of such investments exceeds the net asset value (“NAV”). As further discussed below in Accounting Pronouncements Not Yet Adopted, the Company will adopt ASU 2016-01 on January 1, 2018 which removes the cost method for certain investments and replaces it with fair value through net income method. Under the new guidance, limited partnerships will be reported at fair value and all fluctuations in fair value will be reported through realized gains and losses. Short-term investments include investments in interest-bearing time depositsassets with original maturities of twelve months or less. Gains and losses realized on the disposition of investments are determined on a specific identification basis.
 
Fair Value Measurements, Investments in Securities: Torchmark measures the fair value of its fixed maturities based on a hierarchy consisting of three levels which indicate the quality of the fair value measurements as described below:
 
Level 1—fair values are based on quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities that the Company has the ability to access as of the measurement date.
Level 2 fair values are based on inputs other than quoted prices included in Level 1 that are observable for the asset or liability, either directly or indirectly. Level 2 inputs include quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities in active markets, quoted prices for identical or similar assets or liabilities in markets that are not active, inputs other than quoted prices that are observable for the asset or liability, or inputs that can otherwise be corroborated by observable market data.
Level 3— fair values are based on inputs that are considered unobservable where there is little, if any, market activity for the asset or liability as of the measurement date. In this circumstance, the Company has to rely on values derived by independent brokers or internally-developed assumptions. Unobservable inputs are developed based on the best information available to the Company which may include the Company’s own data or bid and ask prices in the dealer market.

The great majority of Torchmark's fixed maturities are not actively traded and direct quotes are not generally available. Management therefore determines the fair values of these securities after consideration of data provided by third-party pricing services, independent broker/dealers, and other resources. At December 31, 2016,2017, Torchmark's investments in fixed maturities were primarily composed of the following significant security types: Corporate securities, state and municipal securities, redeemable preferred stocks, and U.S. government securities. The remaining security types represented less than 1% of the total in the aggregate.

Over 95% of the fair value reported at December 31, 20162017 was determined using data provided by third-party pricing services. Prices provided by these services are not binding offers, but are estimated exit values. Third-party pricing services use proprietary pricing models to determine security values by discounting cash flows using a market-adjusted spread to a benchmark yield.

For all asset classes within Torchmark’s significant security types, third-party pricing services use a common valuation technique to model the price of the investments using observable market data. The foundation for these models consists of developing yield spreads based on multiple observable market inputs, including but not limited to: benchmark yield curves, actual trading activity, new issue yields, broker-dealer quotes, issuer spreads, two-sided markets, benchmark securities, bids, offers, sector-specific data, economic data, and other inputs that are corroborated in the market. Pricing vendors monitor and review their pricing data continuously with current market and economic data feeds, augmented by ongoing communication within the dealer community.


58
TMK 2017 FORM 10-K

Table of Contents

TORCHMARK CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)
(Dollar amounts in thousands, except per share data)
Note 1—Significant Accounting Policies (continued)

Using the observable market inputs described above, spreads to an appropriate benchmark yield are further developed by the vendors for each security based on security-specific and/or sector-specific risk factors, such as a security’s terms and conditions (coupon, maturity, and call features), credit rating, sector, liquidity, collateral or other cash flow options, and other factors that could impact the risk of the security. Embedded repayment options, such as call and redemption features, are also taken into account in the pricing models. When the spread is determined, it is added to

Index to Financial Statements

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)
(Dollar amounts in thousands except per share data)
Note 1—Significant Accounting Policies (continued)

the security’s benchmark yield. The security's expected cash flows are discounted using this spread-adjusted yield, and the resulting present value of the discounted cash flows is the evaluated price.

When third-party vendor prices are not available, the Company attempts to obtain valuations from other sources, including but not limited to broker/dealers, broker quotes, and prices on comparable securities.

When valuations have been obtained for all securities in the portfolio, management reviews and analyzes the prices to ensure their reasonableness, taking into account available observable information. When two or more valuations are available for a security and the variance between the prices is 10% or less, the close correlation suggests similar observable inputs were used in deriving the price, and the mean of the prices is used. Securities valued in this manner are classified as Level 2. When the variance between two or more valuations for a security exceeds 10%, additional analysis is performed to determine the most appropriate value for that security, using resources such as broker quotes, prices on comparable securities, recent trades, and any other observable market data. Further review is performed on the available valuations to determine if they can be corroborated within reasonable tolerance to any other observable evidence. If one of the valuations or the mean of the available valuations for a security can be corroborated with other observable evidence, then the corroborated value is used and reported as Level 2. The Company uses information and analytical techniques deemed appropriate for determining the point within the range of reasonable fair value estimates that is most representative of fair value under current market conditions. Valuations that cannot be corroborated within a reasonable tolerance are classified as Level 3.

Torchmark invests in a portfolio of private placement bonds which are not actively traded. This portfolio is managed by third parties and was $565 million at amortized cost and $574 million at fair value on December 31, 2016, compared with $542 million at amortized cost and $546 million at fair value a year earlier.parties. The portfolio managers provide valuations for the bonds based on a pricing matrix utilizing observable inputs, such as the benchmark treasury rate and published sector indices, and unobservable inputs such as an internally-developed credit rating. If they cannot be corroborated, the fair values are classified as Level 3. As of December 31, 2016, fair values of $15 million were classified as Level 2, while the remaining balance of $559 million was classified as Level 3. As of December 31, 2015, fair values of $15 million were classified as Level 2, while the remaining balance of $531 million was classified as Level 3.
  
The fair values for each class of security and by valuation hierarchy level are indicated in Note 4—Investments under the caption Fair value measurements and Note 9—Postretirement Benefits under the caption Pension Plans.
 
Fair Value Measurements, Other Financial Instruments: Fair values for cash, short-term investments, short-term debt, mortgage participations, receivables and payables approximate carrying value. Policy loans are an integral part of Torchmark’s subsidiaries’ life insurance policies in force and their fair values cannot be valued separately and apart from the insurance contracts. The fair values of Torchmark’s long-term debt issues are based on the same methodology as investments in fixed maturities. BecauseAt December 31, 2017, observable inputs were available for these debt securities at December 31, 2016, theyand as such were classified as Level 2 in the valuation hierarchy. The fair value for each debt instrument as of December 31, 20162017 is disclosed in Note 11—Debt. As described in Note 9—Postretirement Benefits, Torchmark maintains a nonqualified supplemental retirement plan. Therefore the assets which support the liability for this plan are considered general assets of the Company. These assets consist of the cash value of corporate-owned life insurance policies (COLI) and exchange traded funds (ETFs). The fair value of the insurance cash values approximates carrying value. Fair values for the ETFs are derived from direct quotes and are considered Level 1 in the valuation hierarchy.
 
Impairment of Investments: Torchmark’s portfolio of fixed maturities fluctuates in value due to changes in interest rates in the financial markets as well as other factors. Fluctuations caused by market interest rate changes have little bearing on whether or not the investment will be ultimately recoverable. Therefore, Torchmark considers these declines in value resulting from changes in market interest rates to be temporary. In certain circumstances, however, Torchmark determines that the decline in the value of a security is other-than-temporary and writes the book value of the security down to its fair value, realizing an investment loss. The evaluation of Torchmark’s securities for other-than-temporary impairments is a process that is undertaken at least quarterly and is overseen by a team of Company investment and accounting professionals. Each security, which is impaired because the fair value is less than the cost or amortized cost, is identified

59
TMK 2017 FORM 10-K

Index to Financial StatementsTable of Contents

TORCHMARK CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)
(Dollar amounts in thousands, except per share data)
 
Note 1—Significant Accounting Policies (continued)

cost is identified and evaluated. The determination that an impairment is other-than-temporary is highly subjective and involves the careful consideration of many factors. Among the factors considered are:
 
The length of time and extent to which the security has been impaired
The reason(s) for the impairment
The financial condition of the issuer and the near-term prospects for recovery in fair value of the security
The Company’s ability and intent to hold the security until anticipated recovery
Expected future cash flows

The relative weight given to each of these factors can change over time as facts and circumstances change. In many cases, management believes it is appropriate to give relatively more weight to prospective factors than to retrospective factors. Prospective factors that are given more weight include prospects for recovery, the Company’s ability and intent to hold the security until anticipated recovery, and expected future cash flows.
 
Among the facts and information considered in the process are:
Financial statements of the issuer
Changes in credit ratings of the issuer
The value of underlying collateral
News and information included in press releases issued by the issuer
News and information reported in the media concerning the issuer
News and information published by or otherwise provided by credit analysts
The nature and amount of recent and expected future sources and uses of cash
Default on a required payment
Issuer bankruptcy filings

While all available information is taken into account, it is difficult to predict the ultimate recoverable amount of a distressed or impaired security. If a security is determined to be other-than-temporarily impaired, the cost basis of the security is written down to fair value and is treated as a realized loss in the period the determination is made. The written-down security will be amortized and revenue recognized in accordance with estimated future cash flows.
 
Current accounting guidance is such that if an entity intends to sell or if it is more likely than not that it will be required to sell an impaired security prior to recovery of its cost basis, the security is to be considered other-than-temporarily impaired and the full amount of impairment must be charged to earnings. Otherwise, losses on fixed maturities which are other-than-temporarily impaired are separated into two categories, the portion of loss which is considered credit loss and the portion of loss which is due to other factors. The credit loss portion is charged to earnings while the loss due to other factors is charged to other comprehensive income. The credit loss portion of an impairment is determined as the difference between the security’s amortized cost and the present value of expected future cash flows discounted at the security’s original effective yield rate. The temporary portion is the difference between this present value of expected future cash flows and fair value (as discounted by a market yield). The expected cash flows are determined using judgment and the best information available to the Company. Inputs used to derive expected cash flows include expected default rates, current levels of subordination, and loan-to-collateral value ratios. Management believes that the present value of future cash flows at the original effective yield is a better measure of valuation because fair value determined by a discounted market yield is often based on limited observable market data, and the market for these securities is generally neither active nor orderly.
 
Cash: Cash consists of balances on hand and on deposit in banks and financial institutions.


Index to Financial Statements

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)
(Dollar amounts in thousands except per share data)
Note 1—Significant Accounting Policies (continued)

Accrued investment income: Accrued investment income consists of interest income or dividends earned on the investment portfolio, but are yet to be received as of the balance sheet date.


60
TMK 2017 FORM 10-K

Table of Contents

TORCHMARK CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)
(Dollar amounts in thousands, except per share data)
Note 1—Significant Accounting Policies (continued)

Other Receivables: Other receivables consist primarilymostly of agent debit balances, which primarily represent commissions advanced to insurance agents. These balances are repaid to the Company over time as the premiums associated with the advanced commissions are collected by the Company and the agents' commissions on such premiums are retained. The balance was $353balances were $378 million and $334$353 million at December 31, 20162017 and 2015,2016, respectively. Management believes these balances are recoverable as they are less than the estimated present value of future commissions.

Deferred Acquisition Costs: Certain costs of acquiring new insurance business are deferred and recorded as an asset. These costs are essential for the acquisition of new insurance business and are directly related to the successful issuance of an insurance contract including sales commissions, policy issue costs, and underwriting costs. Additionally, deferred acquisition costs (DAC) include the value of insurance purchased,business acquired (VOBA), which are the costs of acquiring blocks of insurance from other companies or through the acquisition of other companies. These costs represent the difference between the fair value of the contractual insurance assets acquired and liabilities assumed compared against the assets and liabilities for insurance contracts that the Company issues or holds measured in accordance with GAAP. Deferred acquisition costs

DAC and the value of insurance purchasedVOBA are amortized in a systematic manner which matches these costs with the associated revenues. Policies other than universal life-type policies are amortized with interest over the estimated premium-paying period of the policies in a manner which charges each year’s operations in proportion to the receipt of premium income. Universal life-type policies are amortized with interest in proportion to estimated gross profits. The assumptions used to amortize acquisition costs with regard to interest, mortality, morbidity, and persistency are consistent with those used to estimate the liability for future policy benefits. For interest-sensitive and deposit-balance type products, these assumptions are reviewed on a regular basis and are revised if actual experience differs significantly from original expectations. For all other products, amortization assumptions are generally not revised once established. Deferred acquisition costs

DAC are subject to periodic recoverability and loss recognition testing to determine if there is a premium deficiency. These tests evaluate whether the present value of future contract-related cash flows will support the capitalized deferred acquisition costDAC asset. These cash flows consist primarily of premium income, less benefits and expenses taking inflation into account. The present value of these cash flows, less the benefit reserve, is then compared with the unamortized deferred acquisition cost balance. In the event the estimated present value of net cash flows is less, the deficiency would be recognized by a charge to earnings and either a reduction of unamortized acquisition costs or an increase in the liability for future benefits, as described under the caption Future Policy Benefits.

Advertising Costs: Costs related to advertising are generally charged to expense as incurred. However, certain Globe Life Direct Response advertising costs are capitalized when there is a reliable and demonstrated relationship between total costs and future benefits that is a direct result of incurring these costs. Globe Life Direct Response advertising costs consist primarily of the production and distribution costs of direct mail advertising materials, and when capitalized are included as a component of deferred acquisition costs.DAC. They are amortized in the same manner as other deferred acquisition costs.DAC. Globe Life Direct Response advertising costs charged to earnings and included in other operating expense were $9$9.3 million, $10$9.3 million, and $8$9.7 million in 2017, 2016, and 2015, and 2014, respectively. CapitalizedAt December 31, 2017, unamortized capitalized advertising costs included within deferred acquisition costsDAC were $1.28 billion at December 31, 2017 and $1.25 billion at December 31, 2016 and $1.21 billion at December 31, 2015.2016.

Goodwill: The excess cost of a business acquired over the fair value of net assets acquired is reported as goodwill. Goodwill is subject to impairment testing in accordance with GAAP on an annual basis, or whenever potential impairment triggers occur. The Company may perform a qualitative analysis under certain circumstances, or perform a two-step quantitative analysis.

In the qualitative analysis, the Company determines if it is more likely than not that the fair value of a reporting unit is less than its carrying amount by assessing current events and circumstances. If there are factors present indicating potential impairment, the company shouldCompany would proceed to the two-step quantitative analysis as described as follows.


Index to Financial Statements

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)
(Dollar amounts in thousands except per share data)
Note 1—Significant Accounting Policies (continued)
analysis.

In the two-step quantitative analysis, the Company utilizes two approaches, income and market, to determine the fair value of each reporting unit. In the income approach, judgment and assumptions are used in developing the projected cash flows for the reporting units, and such estimates are subject to change. The Company also exercises judgment in the determination of the discount rate as management believes this to be appropriate for the risk associated with the cash flow expectations. In the market approach, the Company utilizes the share price and a control premium based

61
TMK 2017 FORM 10-K

Table of Contents

TORCHMARK CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)
(Dollar amounts in thousands, except per share data)
Note 1—Significant Accounting Policies (continued)

on businesses with similar assets to determine a fair value. In both cases, the fair value of each reporting unit is then measured against that reporting unit’s corresponding carrying value. In the event the fair value is less than the carrying value, further testing is required under the accounting guidance to determine the amount of impairment, if any. If there is an impairment in the goodwill of any reporting unit, it is written down and charged to earnings in the period of the test.

Torchmark tested its goodwill annually as of June 30th in each of the years 20142015 through 2016.2017. Torchmark’s goodwill was not impaired in any of those periods.

Low-Income Housing Tax Credit Interests: Torchmark invests in limited partnerships that provide low-income housing tax credits and other related federal income tax and state premium tax benefits to Torchmark. The carrying value of Torchmark’s investment in these entities was $280$228 million and $306$280 million at December 31, 2017 and 2016, respectively and 2015, respectively. At December 31, 2016, $280 million associated with the federal interests was included in "Other assets" on the Consolidated Balance Sheets. At December 31, 2015, $302 million associated with the federal interests was included in "Other assets" with the remaining $4 million state-related interests included in "Other long-term investments". As of December 31, 2016,2017, Torchmark was obligated under future commitments of $57$34 million, which is includedare recorded in the above carrying value."Other liabilities". For guaranteed investments acquired prior to January 1, 2015, the Company utilizes the effective-yield method of amortization while the proportional method of amortization is utilized for all non-guaranteed as well as guaranteed investments acquired on or after January 1, 2015. All amortization expense is recorded in “Income"Income tax expense”benefit (expense)" on the Consolidated Statements of Operations.

Property and Equipment: Property and equipment, included in “Other assets,” is reported at cost less allowances for depreciation. Depreciation is recorded primarily on the straight line method over the estimated useful lives of these assets which range from three to tenfive years for equipment and fiveten to forty years for buildings and improvements. Ordinary maintenance and repairs are charged to income as incurred. Impairments, if any, are recorded when certain events and circumstances become evident that the fair value of the asset is less than its carrying amount. Original cost of property and equipment was $217 million at December 31, 2017 and $196 million at December 31, 2016 and $175 million at December 31, 2015.2016. Accumulated depreciation was $99$109 million at year end 20162017 and $92$99 million at the end of 2015.2016. Depreciation expense was $10.5 million in 2017, $9.8 million in 2016, and $8.0 million in 2015,2015. Internally generated software costs are expensed as incurred in the preliminary project phase and $7.4 million in 2014.post-implementation phase, and will be capitalized during the application development stage.

Future Policy Benefits: The liability for future policy benefits for annuity and universal life-type products is represented by policy account value. The liability for future policy benefits for all other life and health products, approximately 86%87% of total future policy benefits, is determined on the net level premium method. This method provides for the present value of expected future benefit payments less the present value of expected future net premiums, based on estimated investment yields, mortality, morbidity, persistency and other assumptions which were considered appropriate at the time the policies were issued. For limited-payment contracts, a deferred profit liability is also recorded which causes profits to emerge over the life of the contract in proportion to policies in force.

Assumptions used for traditional life and health insurance products are based primarily on Company experience. Assumptions for interest rates range from 2.5% to 7.0% for Torchmark’s insurance companies with an overall weighted average assumed rate of 5.7%5.80%. Mortality tables used for individual life insurance include various statutory tables and modifications of a variety of generally accepted actuarial tables. Morbidity assumptions for individual health are based on Company experience and industry data. Withdrawal and termination assumptions are based on Torchmark’s experience. Once established, assumptions for these products are generally not changed. An additional provision is made on most products to allow for possible adverse deviation from the assumptions. These estimates are reviewed annually and compared with actual experience. If it is determined that existing contract liabilities, together with the present value of future gross premiums, will not be sufficient to cover the present value of future benefits and to recover unamortized deferred acquisition costs, then a premium deficiency exists. Such a deficiency would be recognized immediately by a charge to earnings and either a

Index to Financial Statements

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)
(Dollar amounts in thousands except per share data)
Note 1—Significant Accounting Policies (continued)

reduction of unamortized deferred acquisition costs or an increase in the liability for future policy benefits. From that point forward, the liability for future policy benefits would be based on revised assumptions.


62
TMK 2017 FORM 10-K

Table of Contents

TORCHMARK CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)
(Dollar amounts in thousands, except per share data)
Note 1—Significant Accounting Policies (continued)

Policy Claims and Other Benefits Payable: Torchmark establishes a liability for known policy benefits payable and an estimate of claims that have been incurred but not yet reported to the Company. Torchmark makes an estimate of unreported claims after careful evaluation of all information available to the Company. This estimate is based on prior experience and is reviewed quarterly. However, there is no certainty the stated liability for claims and other benefits, including the estimate of unsubmitted claims, will be Torchmark’s ultimate obligation.

Income Taxes: Income taxes are accounted for under the asset and liability method. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are recognized for the future tax consequences attributable to differences between the financial statement book values and tax bases of assets and liabilities. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are measured using enacted tax rates expected to apply to taxable income in the years in which those temporary differences are expected to be recovered or settled. The effect on deferred tax assets and liabilities of a change in tax rates is recognized in income in the period that includes the enactment date.
On December 22, 2017, the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (Tax Legislation) was enacted into law which changed existing tax law, including a reduction of the corporate income tax rate from 35% to 21% effective January 1, 2018. The Company recorded $877 million of tax benefits in net income in 2017 as a result of re-measuring its deferred assets and liabilities using the lower corporate tax rate as of the date of enactment. Based on the analysis of the Tax Legislation, the Company was able to determine that this amount is a reasonable estimate of the impact of the Tax Legislation in accordance with SEC Staff Accounting Bulletin (SAB) No. 118. However, the Company will continue to analyze relevant information to complete the accounting for income taxes which may result in an adjustment to tax expense in 2018. The accounting is expected to be complete when the 2017 U.S. corporate income tax returns are filed later in 2018. More information concerning income taxes is provided in Note 8—Income Taxes.

Postretirement Benefits: Torchmark accounts for its postretirement defined benefit plans by recognizing the funded status of those plans on its Consolidated Balance Sheets in accordance with accounting guidance. Periodic gains and losses attributable to changes in plan assets and liabilities that are not recognized as components of net periodic benefit costs are recognized as components of other comprehensive income, net of tax. More information concerning the accounting and disclosures for postretirement benefits is found in Note 9—Postretirement Benefits.

Treasury Stock: Torchmark accounts for purchases of treasury stock on the cost method. Issuance of treasury stock is accounted for using the weighted-average cost method. More information is found in Note 12—Shareholders' Equity.

Recognition of Premium Revenue and Related Expenses: Premium income for traditional long-duration life and health insurance products is recognized evenly over the contract period and when due from the policyholder. Premiums for short-duration health contracts are recognized as revenue over the contract period in proportion to the insurance protection provided. Premiums for universal life-type and annuity contracts are added to the policy account value, and revenues for such products are recognized as charges to the policy account value for mortality, administration, and surrenders (retrospective deposit method). Life premium includes policy charges of $17 million, $18 million, $19 million, and $21$19 million for the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016, 2015, and 2014,2015, respectively. Other premium consists of annuity policy charges in each year. For most insurance products, the related benefits and expenses are matched with revenues by means of the provision of future policy benefits and the amortization of deferred acquisition costsDAC in a manner which recognizes profits as they are earned over the revenue recognition period. For limited-payment life insurance products, the profits are recognized over the contract period.
 
Stock-Based Compensation: Torchmark accounts for stock-based compensation by recognizing an expense in the financial statements based on the “fair value method.” The fair value method requires that a fair value be assigned to a stock option or other stock grant on its grant date and that this value be amortized over the grantees’ service period.
 

63
TMK 2017 FORM 10-K

Table of Contents

TORCHMARK CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)
(Dollar amounts in thousands, except per share data)
Note 1—Significant Accounting Policies (continued)

The fair value method requires the use of an option valuation model to value employee stock options. Torchmark has elected to use the Black-Scholes valuation model for option expensing. A summary of assumptions for options granted in each of the three years 20142015 through 20162017 is as follows:
 2016 2015 2014
Volatility factor19.2% 23.6% 30.9%
Dividend yield1.1% 0.9% 0.9%
Expected term (in years)5.78
 5.66
 5.65
Risk-free rate1.3% 1.6% 1.9%


Index to Financial Statements

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)
(Dollar amounts in thousands except per share data)
Note 1—Significant Accounting Policies (continued)
 2017 2016 2015
Volatility factor14.8% 19.2% 23.6%
Dividend yield0.7% 1.1% 0.9%
Expected term (in years)5.71
 5.78
 5.66
Risk-free rate2.0% 1.3% 1.6%

The expected term is generally derived from Company experience. However, expected terms are determined based on the simplified method as permitted under the ASC 718 Stock Compensation topic when companyCompany experience is insufficient. The Torchmark Corporation 2011 Incentive Plan replaced all previous plans and allows for option grants for employees with a ten-year contractual term which vest over five years in addition to seven-year grants which vest over three years as permitted by the previous plans. Director grants vest over six months. The Company has sufficient experience with seven-year grants that vest in three years, but insufficient historical experience with five-year vesting. Therefore, Torchmark has used the simplified method to determine the expected term for the ten-year grants with five-year vesting and will do so until adequate experience is developed. Volatility and risk-free interest rates are assumed over a period of time consistent with the expected term of the option. Volatility is measured on a historical basis. Monthly data points are utilized to derive volatility for periods greater than three years. Expected dividend yield is based on current dividend yield held constant over the expected term. Once the fair value of an option has been determined, it is amortized on a straight-line basis over the employee’s service period for that grant (from the grant date to the date the grant is fully vested). Expenses for restricted stock and restricted stock units are based on the grant date fair value allocated on a straight-line basis over the service period. Performance share expense is recognized based on management’s estimate of the probability of meeting the metrics identified in the performance share award agreement, assigned to each service period as these estimates develop.
 
Torchmark management views all stock-based compensation expense as a corporate or Parent Company expense and, therefore, presents it as such in its segment analysis (See Note 14—Business Segments). It is included in “Other operating expense” in the Consolidated Statements of Operations.
  
Earnings Per Share: Torchmark presents basic and diluted earnings per common share (EPS) on the face of the Consolidated Statements of Operations for income from continuing operations and income from discontinued operations. Basic EPS is computed by dividing income available to common shareholders by the weighted average common shares outstanding for the period. Diluted EPS is calculated by adding to shares outstanding the additional net effect of potentially dilutive securities or contracts, such as stock options, which could be exercised or converted into common shares. Due to the prospective adoption of ASU 2016-09, as further discussed below, an adjustment was made to the weighted average diluted shares outstanding in 2016 to exclude excess tax benefits from the assumed proceeds in the diluted shares calculation. For more information on earnings per share, see Note 12—Shareholders’ Equity.
 
Accounting Pronouncements Adopted in the Current Year:

Going ConcernASU 2018-02: In August 2014,February 2018, the FASB issued Accounting Standards UpdateASU No. 2014-15,2018-02, PresentationIncome Statement—Reporting Comprehensive Income (Topic 220): Reclassification of Financial Statements—Going Concern (Subtopic 205-40)Certain Tax Effects from Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (AOCI). This accounting standard requires managementguidance was issued to perform interim and annual assessmentsallow the reclassification of taxes from AOCI to retained earnings as a result of the entity's abilityreduction in corporate income tax rates due to continue its business operations within one yearTax Legislation. Current accounting requires the effect of changes in tax rates used to measure deferred tax assets and liabilities to be reported in net income as of the date of issuance of its financial statements.enactment even though deferred taxes were previously recognized in AOCI (stranded taxes). This guidance, however, allows a company to elect to reclassify the stranded taxes in AOCI to retained earnings and is effective for years beginning after December 15, 2018, with early adoption permitted. The Company must then provide certain disclosure if there is substantial doubt about its ability to continue as a going concern. As of January 1, 2016, the Company adopted this standard with no impact to the financial statements.
Short-Duration Contracts: The FASB issued Accounting Standards Update No. 2015-09 Financial Services-Insurance: Disclosures about Short-Duration Contracts (ASU 2015-09), requiring companies to disclose additional information with regards to its short-duration insurance contracts. These new disclosures provide additional insight into an insurance entity’s ability to underwrite claims. Torchmark's disclosures under ASU 2015-09 are effective for the 2016 annual consolidated financial statements. The guidance consists only of new disclosures and did not impact the accounting for short-duration contracts. See Note 7—Liability for Unpaid Claims.
Excess Tax Benefits: In March 2016, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update No. 2016-09, Compensation—Stock Compensation (Topic 718): Improvements to Employee Share-Based Payment Accounting to simplify certain aspects of accounting for share-based payment award transactions including: (a) income tax consequences; (b) classification in the statement of cash flows; and (c) accounting for forfeitures. Torchmark elected to early adopt this standard asguidance resulting in a reclassification of January 1, 2016, as permitted. This new accounting standard primarily causes excess tax benefits$252 million from AOCI to be recognized throughretained earnings affecting Torchmark's computationsfor the period ended December 31, 2017. See Consolidated Statements of net income, diluted shares outstanding, Shareholders' Equity and earnings per share.Note 3—Supplemental Information about Changes to Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income.


64
TMK 2017 FORM 10-K

Index to Financial StatementsTable of Contents

TORCHMARK CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)
(Dollar amounts in thousands, except per share data)
 
Note 1—Significant Accounting Policies (continued)


While the intent of the adoption of this guidance is simplification, inherent changes in future share prices and volume of stock option exercises are expected to result in increased volatility in net income and earnings per share in future periods. As provided by the new standard, the adoption is prospective and thus will impact only 2016 and future periods.

Below is a listing of the effects of the prospective adoption of this guidance due to the change in accounting of excess tax benefits:
Consolidated statement of operations: For the year ended 2016, the Company recorded $20 million in excess tax benefits as a component of income taxes, which resulted in an increase in net income as compared with 2015 and 2014 when the excess tax benefits of $18 million and $19 million, respectively, were recorded as a component of additional paid-in capital on the balance sheet.
Weighted average diluted shares: The weighted average diluted shares outstanding were adjusted to exclude excess tax benefits from the assumed proceeds in the diluted shares calculation. This change resulted in diluted weighted average shares outstanding of 122.4 million for 2016, as compared with 121.5 million previous guidance.
Earnings per share: The adoption resulted in a $0.13 increase in earnings per share for the year ended December 31, 2016.
Consolidated statement of cash flows: The excess tax benefits related to share-based payments of $20 million were presented as a component of operating activities in the same manner as other cash flows related to income taxes. In 2015 and 2014, the excess tax benefits of $18 million and $19 million, respectively, were presented within financing activities.
Accounting Pronouncements Not Yet Adopted:

ASU 2016-01: In January 2016, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued Accounting Standards Update (ASU) No. 2016-01, Financial Instruments—Overall (Subtopic 825-10): Recognition and Measurement of Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities, which primarily revises the classification and measurement of certain equity investments such that they will be measured at fair value through net income. Additionally, it eliminates the cost method for partnerships and joint ventures and requires these types of investments to be accounted for under the fair value through net income method or equity method. Lastly, the guidance will require certain disclosures associated with fair value of financial instruments. This standard became effective for the Company on January 1, 2018. The adoption will result in a $6 million positive adjustment to the opening balance of retained earnings as we have minimal ownership interests in equity investments and partnerships.
Leases:ASU 2016-02: In February 2016, the FASB issued Accounting Standards UpdateASU No. 2016-02, Leases (Topic 842), which requires all lessees to report a right-of-use asset and a lease liability for most leases. For lessors,leases with a term life greater than 12 months. Operating and financing leases will be recognized on the standard modifies the classification criteriabalance sheet going forward. Additional qualitative and the accounting for sales-type and direct financing leases. Thequantitative disclosures will be required. This standard will become effective for the Company beginning January 1, 2019 and will require recognizing and measuring leases at the beginning of the earliest period presented using a modified retrospective approach. Early adoption is permitted. The Company does not expect the adoption to have a significant impact on the financial statements. Refer to Note 15—Commitments and Contingencies for consideration of five yearthe noncancelable operating lease commitments. The Company is not a lessor.
Investment ImpairmentASU 2016-13: :In June 2016, the FASB issued Accounting Standards UpdateASU No. 2016-13, Financial Instruments—Credit Losses (Topic 326): Measurement of Credit Losses on Financial Instruments to provide financial statement users with more decision-useful information about the expected credit losses on financial instruments as well as to change the loss impairment methodology for available-for-sale debt securities.securities by use of an allowance rather than a direct write-down. This standard will become effective on January 1, 2020. The applicable section of the standard related to debt securities requires a prospective transition. The Company does not expect the adoption to have a significant impact on the financial statements.statements as we have limited credit losses with respect to our available-for-sale portfolio.
Cash Flows:ASU 2016-15: In August 2016, the FASB issued Accounting Standards UpdateASU No. 2016-15, Statement of Cash Flows:Flows (Topic 230): Classification of Certain Cash Receipts and Cash Payments.Payments This guidance was issuedto provide uniformity in the classification of cash receipts and payments recorded in the statement of cash flows including debt prepayment or debt extinguishment costs, settlementssettlement of zero-coupon bonds, and proceeds from the settlement of insurance claims. This standard will becomebecame effective on January 1, 2018. The Company is currently evaluating2018 and will not have a significant impact to the standard to determine its impact.classification on our Statement of Cash Flows.
Income Taxes:ASU 2016-16: In October 2016, the FASB issued Accounting Standards UpdateASU No. 2016-16, Income Taxes:Taxes (Topic 740): Intra-Entity Transfer of Assets Other Than Inventory. This guidance was issued to improve the accounting for income tax consequences of intra-entity transfers of assets other than inventory by allowing the immediate recognition of the current and deferred income tax effects. Current guidance prohibits the recognition of current and deferred income

Index to Financial Statements

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)
(Dollar amounts in thousands except per share data)
Note 1—Significant Accounting Policies (continued)

taxes for an intra-entity transfer until the asset has been sold to an outside party. This new guidance should be applied on a modified retrospective approach and will becomebecame effective on January 1, 2018. The Company doesThis adoption will not expect the adoption to have a significant impact on the financial statements.
Goodwill: ASU 2017-04:In January 2017, the FASB issued Accounting Standards UpdateASU No. 2017-04, Intangibles—Goodwill and Other:Other (Topic 350): Simplifying the Test for Goodwill Impairment. This guidance was issued to simplify the subsequent measurement of goodwill through the elimination of Step 2 from the goodwill impairment test.test which required a hypothetical purchase price allocation. It will become effective on January 1, 2020 and should be applied on a prospective basis. This adoption will not have an impact to the financial statements.

65
TMK 2017 FORM 10-K

Table of Contents

TORCHMARK CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)
(Dollar amounts in thousands, except per share data)
Note 1—Significant Accounting Policies (continued)

ASU 2017-07: In March 2017, the FASB issued ASU No. 2017-07, Compensation—Retirement Benefits (Topic 715): Improving the Presentation of Net Periodic Pension Cost and Net Periodic Postretirement Benefit Cost. This guidance was issued to simplify the reporting of pension costs by disaggregating the service-cost component from the other components of net benefit costs and reporting it separately on the income statement. The service-cost component is the only component of net benefit cost that will be eligible for capitalization. The guidance became effective on January 1, 2018 with a retrospective transition method for separation of net benefit costs and a prospective transition method for the capitalization of service costs. The Company does not expectexpects the adoption to add an additional $3 to $5 million in expense to the 2018 Consolidated Statements of Operations due to the elimination of the ability to capitalize a portion of the benefit costs.
ASU 2017-08: In March 2017, the FASB issued ASU No. 2017-08, Receivables—Nonrefundable Fees and Other Costs (Topic 310-20): Premium Amortization on Purchased Callable Debt Securities. This guidance was issued to shorten the amortization period for certain callable debt securities held at a premium. The guidance requires the premium to be amortized to the earliest call date. It will become effective on January 1, 2019 with early adoption permitted, including during interim periods. The adoption is to be applied on a modified retrospective basis through an adjustment to retained earnings. This adoption will not have a significant impact on the financial statements.
ASU 2017-09: In May 2017, the FASB issued ASU No. 2017-09, Compensation—Stock Compensation (Topic 718): Scope of Modification Accounting. This guidance was issued to provide clarity and guidance regarding changes to the terms or conditions of a share-based payment award that requires an entity to apply modification accounting. It became effective on January 1, 2018 with early adoption permitted, including adoption in any interim periods. The adoption will have a minimal impact on the financial statements as modifications to stock compensation are infrequent.


66
TMK 2017 FORM 10-K

Table of Contents


TORCHMARK CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)
(Dollar amounts in thousands, except per share data)

Note 2—Statutory Accounting

Life insurance subsidiaries of Torchmark are required to file statutory financial statements with state insurance regulatory authorities. Accounting principles used to prepare these statutory financial statements differ from GAAP. Consolidated net income and shareholders’ equity (capital and surplus) on a statutory basis for the insurance subsidiaries were as follows:
 Net Income Shareholders’ Equity
 Year Ended December 31, At December 31,
 2016 2015 2014 2016 2015
Life insurance subsidiaries$429,563
 $393,466
 $446,439
 $1,335,070
 $1,253,007
 Net Income Shareholders’ Equity
 Year Ended December 31, At December 31,
 2017 2016 2015 2017 2016
Life insurance subsidiaries$426,285
 $429,563
 $393,466
 $1,254,875
 $1,335,070
 
The excess, if any, of shareholder’s equity of the insurance subsidiaries on a GAAP basis over that determined on a statutory basis is not available for distribution by the insurance subsidiaries to Torchmark without regulatory approval. Insurance subsidiaries’ statutory capital and surplus necessary to satisfy regulatory requirements in the aggregate was $477$458 million at December 31, 2016.2017. More information on the restrictions on the payment of dividends can be found in Note 12—Shareholders’ Equity.
 
Torchmark’s statutory financial statements are presented on the basis of accounting practices prescribed by the insurance department of the state of domicile of each insurance subsidiary. While all states have adopted the National Association of Insurance Commissioners’ (NAIC) statutory accounting practices (NAIC SAP) as the basis for statutory accounting, certain states have retained prescribed practices of their respective insurance code or administrative code which can differ from NAIC SAP. For Torchmark’s life insurance companies, there are no significant differences between NAIC SAP and the accounting practices prescribed by the states of domicile.

67
TMK 2017 FORM 10-K

Index to Financial Statements
Table of Contents


TORCHMARK CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)
(Dollar amounts in thousands, except per share data)

Note 3—Supplemental Information about Changes to Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income
An analysis in the change in balance by component of Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income is as follows for each of the years 20142015 through 2016.2017.
 
Components of Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income
For the 12 months ended December 31, 2014:Available
for Sale
Assets
 Deferred
Acquisition
Costs
 Foreign
Exchange
 Pension
Adjustments
 Total
Balance at January 1, 2014$256,196
 $(6,728) $24,866
 $(63,353) $210,981
Other comprehensive income (loss) before reclassifications, net of tax855,132
 (4,030) (7,480) (42,781) 800,841
Reclassifications, net of tax(21,055) 
 
 6,685
 (14,370)
Other comprehensive income (loss)834,077
 (4,030) (7,480) (36,096) 786,471
Balance at December 31, 20141,090,273
 (10,758) 17,386
 (99,449) 997,452
         
For the 12 months ended December 31, 2015:         Available
for Sale
Assets
 Deferred
Acquisition
Costs
 Foreign
Exchange
 Pension
Adjustments
 Total
Balance at January 1, 2015$1,090,273
 $(10,758) $17,386
 $(99,449) $997,452
Other comprehensive income (loss) before reclassifications, net of tax(759,976) 5,643
 (13,759) (8,930) (777,022)(759,976) 5,643
 (13,759) (8,930) (777,022)
Reclassifications, net of tax2,036
 
 
 9,481
 11,517
2,036
 
 
 9,481
 11,517
Other comprehensive income (loss)(757,940) 5,643
 (13,759) 551
 (765,505)(757,940) 5,643
 (13,759) 551
 (765,505)
Balance at December 31, 2015332,333
 (5,115) 3,627
 (98,898) 231,947
332,333
 (5,115) 3,627
 (98,898) 231,947
                  
For the 12 months ended December 31, 2016: 
  
  
  
  
         
Other comprehensive income (loss) before reclassifications, net of tax356,016
 (1,567) 1,340
 (20,736) 335,053
356,016
 (1,567) 1,340
 (20,736) 335,053
Reclassifications, net of tax3,965
 
 
 6,609
 10,574
3,965
 
 
 6,609
 10,574
Other comprehensive income (loss)359,981
 (1,567) 1,340
 (14,127) 345,627
359,981
 (1,567) 1,340
 (14,127) 345,627
Balance at December 31, 2016$692,314
 $(6,682) $4,967
 $(113,025) $577,574
692,314
 (6,682) 4,967
 (113,025) 577,574
         
For the 12 months ended December 31, 2017: 
  
  
  
  
Other comprehensive income (loss) before reclassifications, net of tax621,619
 (350) 8,452
 (20,753) 608,968
Reclassifications, net of tax(22,751) 
 
 8,083
 (14,668)
Other comprehensive income (loss)598,868
 (350) 8,452
 (12,670) 594,300
Reclassifications, Tax reform(1)
278,107
 (1,515) 2,883
 (27,075) 252,400
Balance at December 31, 2017$1,569,289
 $(8,547) $16,302
 $(152,770) $1,424,274
 
(1)
Income tax effects of certain items were reclassified from accumulated other comprehensive income to retained earnings to remove stranded tax effects as a result of early adoption of ASU No. 2018-02, Income Statement—Reporting Comprehensive Income (Topic 220): Reclassification of Certain Tax Effects from Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income. See further discussion in Note 1—Significant Accounting Policies.


68
TMK 2017 FORM 10-K

Index to Financial StatementsTable of Contents


TORCHMARK CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)
(Dollar amounts in thousands, except per share data)
 
Note 3—Supplemental Information about Changes to Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (continued)


ReclassificationsReclassification adjustments out of Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income are presented below for each of the years 20142015 through 2016.2017.
 
Reclassification Adjustments
 Year Ended December 31,   Year Ended December 31,  
Component Line Item 2016 2015 2014 Affected line items in the
Statement of Operations
 2017 2016 2015 Affected line items in the
Statement of Operations
Unrealized gains (losses) on available for sale assets:              
Realized (gains) losses $10,285
 $9,478
 $(23,771) Realized investment gains (losses) $(34,954) $10,285
 $9,478
 Realized investment gains (losses)
Amortization of (discount) premium (4,185) (6,346) (8,621) Net investment income (47) (4,185) (6,346) Net investment income
Total before tax 6,100
 3,132
 (32,392)  (35,001) 6,100
 3,132
 
Tax (2,135) (1,096) 11,337
 Income taxes 12,250
 (2,135) (1,096) Income taxes
Total after tax 3,965
 2,036
 (21,055)  (22,751) 3,965
 2,036
 
Pension adjustments:              
Amortization of prior service cost 477
 377
 2,113
 Other operating expenses 476
 477
 377
 Other operating expenses
Amortization of actuarial (gain) loss 9,691
 14,209
 8,172
 Other operating expenses 11,960
 9,691
 14,209
 Other operating expenses
Total before tax 10,168
 14,586
 10,285
  12,436
 10,168
 14,586
 
Tax (3,559) (5,105) (3,600) Income taxes (4,353) (3,559) (5,105) Income taxes
Total after tax 6,609
 9,481
 6,685
  8,083
 6,609
 9,481
 
Total reclassifications (after tax) $10,574
 $11,517
 $(14,370)  $(14,668) $10,574
 $11,517
 


69
TMK 2017 FORM 10-K

Index to Financial Statements
Table of Contents


TORCHMARK CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)
(Dollar amounts in thousands, except per share data)

Note 4—Investments

Portfolio Composition:
 
A summary of fixed maturities available for sale by cost or amortized cost and estimated fair value at December 31, 20162017 and 20152016 is as follows:
2016:Cost or
Amortized
Cost
 Gross
Unrealized
Gains
 Gross
Unrealized
Losses
 
Fair Value(1)
 
% of Total
Fixed
Maturities
(2)
2017:Cost or
Amortized
Cost
 Gross
Unrealized
Gains
 Gross
Unrealized
Losses
 
Fair Value(1)
 
% of Total
Fixed
Maturities
(2)
Fixed maturities available for sale:                  
U.S. Government direct, guaranteed, and government-sponsored enterprises$381,054
 $895
 $(9,151) $372,798
 3$390,646
 $18,173
 $(1,373) $407,446
 2
States, municipalities, and political subdivisions1,284,605
 126,850
 (1,327) 1,410,128
 91,091,960
 127,890
 (135) 1,219,715
 7
Foreign governments21,701
 1,438
 (62) 23,077
 20,236
 1,782
 
 22,018
 
Corporates, by sector:

 

 

 

 
        
Financial2,963,584
 285,037
 (45,885) 3,202,736
 213,282,526
 475,961
 (23,392) 3,735,095
 22
Utilities1,875,946
 249,701
 (12,604) 2,113,043
 141,955,737
 369,406
 (1,298) 2,323,845
 14
Energy1,542,426
 127,989
 (44,324) 1,626,091
 111,619,349
 226,140
 (25,392) 1,820,097
 11
Other corporate sectors5,601,136
 424,021
 (84,547) 5,940,610
 396,065,803
 747,612
 (20,616) 6,792,799
 40
Total corporates11,983,092
 1,086,748
 (187,360) 12,882,480
 8512,923,415
 1,819,119
 (70,698) 14,671,836
 87
Collateralized debt obligations60,726
 13,062
 (10,285) 63,503
 59,150
 20,084
 (7,653) 71,581
 
Other asset-backed securities56,410
 621
 (337) 56,694
 144,520
 4,835
 
 149,355
 1
Redeemable preferred stocks, by sector:                
Financial371,862
 43,383
 (7,218) 408,027
 3336,621
 62,892
 (2,727) 396,786
 3
Utilities28,600
 798
 (244) 29,154
 28,553
 2,132
 (97) 30,588
 
Total redeemable preferred stocks400,462
 44,181
 (7,462) 437,181
 3365,174
 65,024
 (2,824) 427,374
 3
Total fixed maturities$14,188,050
 $1,273,795
 $(215,984) $15,245,861
 100$14,995,101
 $2,056,907
 $(82,683) $16,969,325
 100
(1) Amount reported in the balance sheet.
(2) At fair value.


70
TMK 2017 FORM 10-K

Index to Financial StatementsTable of Contents


TORCHMARK CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)
(Dollar amounts in thousands, except per share data)
 
Note 4—Investments (continued)

2015:Cost or
Amortized
Cost
 Gross
Unrealized
Gains
 Gross
Unrealized
Losses
 
Fair Value(1)
 
% of Total
Fixed
Maturities
(2)
2016:Cost or
Amortized
Cost
 Gross
Unrealized
Gains
 Gross
Unrealized
Losses
 
Fair Value(1)
 
% of Total
Fixed
Maturities
(2)
Fixed maturities available for sale:                  
U.S. Government direct, guaranteed, and government-sponsored enterprises$368,718
 $404
 $(14,078) $355,044
 3$381,054
 $895
 $(9,151) $372,798
 3
States, municipalities, and political subdivisions1,296,396
 131,516
 (1,908) 1,426,004
 101,284,605
 126,850
 (1,327) 1,410,128
 9
Foreign governments21,594
 1,369
 (163) 22,800
 21,701
 1,438
 (62) 23,077
 
Corporates, by sector:                
Financial2,760,552
 301,624
 (54,881) 3,007,295
 222,963,584
 285,037
 (45,885) 3,202,736
 21
Utilities1,981,241
 223,535
 (28,267) 2,176,509
 161,875,946
 249,701
 (12,604) 2,113,043
 14
Energy1,568,392
 53,776
 (219,101) 1,403,067
 101,542,426
 127,989
 (44,324) 1,626,091
 11
Other corporate sectors4,761,192
 294,026
 (230,911) 4,824,307
 355,601,136
 424,021
 (84,547) 5,940,610
 39
Total corporates11,071,377
 872,961
 (533,160) 11,411,178
 8311,983,092
 1,086,748
 (187,360) 12,882,480
 85
Collateralized debt obligations63,662
 16,158
 (9,438) 70,382
 160,726
 13,062
 (10,285) 63,503
 
Other asset-backed securities18,963
 668
 
 19,631
 56,410
 621
 (337) 56,694
 
Redeemable preferred stocks, by sector:                
Financial382,517
 45,926
 (4,781) 423,662
 3371,862
 43,383
 (7,218) 408,027
 3
Utilities28,644
 731
 (52) 29,323
 28,600
 798
 (244) 29,154
 
Total redeemable preferred stocks411,161
 46,657
 (4,833) 452,985
 3400,462
 44,181
 (7,462) 437,181
 3
Total fixed maturities$13,251,871
 $1,069,733
 $(563,580) $13,758,024
 100$14,188,050
 $1,273,795
 $(215,984) $15,245,861
 100
(1) Amount reported in the balance sheet.
(2) At fair value.

Securities, cash, and short-term investments held on depositsdeposit with various state and federal regulatory authorities had a carryingan amortized cost and fair value, respectively, of $600$657 million and $555$753 million at December 31, 20162017 and 2015, respectively.$600 million and $663 million at December 31, 2016.

A schedule of fixed maturities available for sale by contractual maturity date at December 31, 20162017 is shown below on an amortized cost basis and on a fair value basis. Actual maturitiesmaturity dates could differ from contractual maturities due to call or prepayment provisions.

Amortized
Cost
 Fair
Value
Amortized
Cost
 Fair
Value
Fixed maturities available for sale:      
Due in one year or less$23,969
 $24,573
$147,457
 $149,495
Due from one to five years640,903
 688,509
Due from five to ten years1,228,081
 1,337,752
Due from ten to twenty years4,278,896
 4,746,466
Due after one year through five years682,932
 720,186
Due after five years through ten years1,397,473
 1,567,972
Due after ten years through twenty years4,701,591
 5,519,917
Due after twenty years7,897,726
 8,326,907
7,861,000
 8,789,769
Mortgage-backed and asset-backed securities118,475
 121,654
204,648
 221,986

$14,188,050
 $15,245,861
$14,995,101
 $16,969,325
 

71
TMK 2017 FORM 10-K

Index to Financial StatementsTable of Contents


TORCHMARK CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)
(Dollar amounts in thousands, except per share data)
 
Note 4—Investments (continued)

Analysis of investment operations:
Year Ended December 31,Year Ended December 31,
2016 2015 20142017 2016 2015
Net investment income is summarized as follows:          
Fixed maturities$778,912
 $747,663
 $732,925
Fixed maturities available for sale$817,213
 $778,912
 $747,663
Policy loans38,436
 36,763
 35,015
39,578
 38,436
 36,763
Other long-term investments2,786
 2,021
 1,516
4,991
 2,786
 2,021
Short-term investments447
 95
 75
948
 447
 95
820,581
 786,542
 769,531
862,730
 820,581
 786,542
Less investment expense(13,678) (12,591) (11,245)(14,845) (13,678) (12,591)
Net investment income$806,903
 $773,951
 $758,286
$847,885
 $806,903
 $773,951
An analysis of realized gains (losses) from investments is as follows:          
Realized investment gains (losses):          
Fixed maturities$(10,645) $(9,479) $23,170
Fixed maturities available for sale:     
Sales and other$35,199
 $(10,645) $(9,479)
Other-than-temporary impairments(245) 
 
Other investments(38) 688
 636
(7,302) (38) 688
Loss on redemption on debt
 
 (258)(4,041) 
 
(10,683) (8,791) 23,548
23,611
 (10,683) (8,791)
Applicable tax3,739
 3,077
 (8,242)(6,021) 3,739
 3,077
Realized gains (losses) from investments, net of tax$(6,944) $(5,714) $15,306
$17,590
 $(6,944) $(5,714)
An analysis of the net change in unrealized investment gains (losses) is as follows:          
Fixed maturities$551,658
 $(1,163,295) $1,279,190
Fixed maturities available for sale$916,413
 $551,658
 $(1,163,295)
Other investments2,143
 (2,737) 3,872
5,008
 2,143
 (2,737)
Net change in unrealized gains (losses)$553,801
 $(1,166,032) $1,283,062
$921,421
 $553,801
 $(1,166,032)

Additional information about securities sold is as follows:
At December 31,At December 31,
2016 2015 20142017 2016 2015
Fixed maturities:     
Fixed maturities available for sale:     
Proceeds from sales(1)
$358,285
 $226,792
 $109,024
$67,246
 $358,285
 $226,792
Gross realized gains6,133
 259
 17,583
5,079
 6,133
 259
Gross realized losses(32,608) (16,894) (1,879)(1,100) (32,608) (16,894)
(1)Includes unsettled sales of $18$17.9 million at December 31, 2016. There were no unsettled sales in 2017 or 2015.

72
TMK 2017 FORM 10-K

Index to Financial StatementsTable of Contents


TORCHMARK CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)
(Dollar amounts in thousands, except per share data)
 
Note 4—Investments (continued)

Fair value measurements: The following tables represent the fair value of fixed maturities measured on a recurring basis at December 31, 20162017 and 2015:2016:
 Fair Value Measurements at December 31, 2017 Using:
Description
Quoted Prices in
Active Markets
for Identical
Assets (Level 1)
 
Significant Other
Observable
Inputs (Level 2)
 
Significant
Unobservable
Inputs (Level 3)
 
Total Fair
Value
Fixed maturities available for sale:       
U.S. Government direct, guaranteed, and government-sponsored enterprises$
 $407,446
 $
 $407,446
States, municipalities, and political subdivisions44
 1,219,671
 
 1,219,715
Foreign governments
 22,018
 
 22,018
Corporates, by sector:       
Financial
 3,673,089
 62,006
 3,735,095
Utilities
 2,168,115
 155,730
 2,323,845
Energy
 1,779,281
 40,816
 1,820,097
Other corporate sectors
 6,468,541
 324,258
 6,792,799
Total corporates
 14,089,026
 582,810
 14,671,836
Collateralized debt obligations
 
 71,581
 71,581
Other asset-backed securities
 135,306
 14,049
 149,355
Redeemable preferred stocks, by sector:       
Financial
 396,786
 
 396,786
Utilities
 30,588
 
 30,588
Total redeemable preferred stocks
 427,374
 
 427,374
Total fixed maturities$44
 $16,300,841
 $668,440
 $16,969,325
Percentage of total% 96.1% 3.9% 100.0%
 Fair Value Measurements at December 31, 2016 Using:
Description
Quoted Prices in
Active Markets
for Identical
Assets (Level 1)
 
Significant Other
Observable
Inputs (Level 2)
 
Significant
Unobservable
Inputs (Level 3)
 
Total Fair
Value
Fixed maturities available for sale:       
U.S. Government direct, guaranteed, and government-sponsored enterprises$
 $372,798
 $
 $372,798
States, municipalities, and political subdivisions45,302
 1,364,826
 
 1,410,128
Foreign governments
 23,077
 
 23,077
Corporates, by sector:       
Financial
 3,141,611
 61,125
 3,202,736
Utilities
 1,959,143
 153,900
 2,113,043
Energy
 1,598,976
 27,115
 1,626,091
Other corporate sectors
 5,623,150
 317,460
 5,940,610
Total corporates
 12,322,880
 559,600
 12,882,480
Collateralized debt obligations
 
 63,503
 63,503
Other asset-backed securities
 56,694
 
 56,694
Redeemable preferred stocks, by sector:       
Financial
 408,027
 
 408,027
Utilities
 29,154
 
 29,154
Total redeemable preferred stocks
 437,181
 
 437,181
Total fixed maturities$45,302
 $14,577,456
 $623,103
 $15,245,861
Percentage of total0.3% 95.6% 4.1% 100.0%

73
TMK 2017 FORM 10-K

 Fair Value Measurements at December 31, 2015 Using:
Description
Quoted Prices in
Active Markets
for Identical
Assets (Level 1)
 
Significant Other
Observable
Inputs (Level 2)
 
Significant
Unobservable
Inputs (Level 3)
 
Total Fair
Value
Fixed maturities available for sale:       
U.S. Government direct, guaranteed, and government-sponsored enterprises$
 $355,044
 $
 $355,044
States, municipalities, and political subdivisions
 1,426,004
 
 1,426,004
Foreign governments
 22,800
 
 22,800
Corporates, by sector:       
Financial
 2,945,048
 62,247
 3,007,295
Utilities22,189
 2,020,268
 134,052
 2,176,509
Energy
 1,377,861
 25,206
 1,403,067
Other corporate sectors
 4,515,006
 309,301
 4,824,307
Total corporates22,189
 10,858,183
 530,806
 11,411,178
Collateralized debt obligations
 
 70,382
 70,382
Other asset-backed securities
 19,631
 
 19,631
Redeemable preferred stocks, by sector:       
Financial10,124
 413,538
 
 423,662
Utilities
 29,323
 
 29,323
Total redeemable preferred stocks10,124
 442,861
 
 452,985
Total fixed maturities$32,313
 $13,124,523
 $601,188
 $13,758,024
Percentage of total0.2% 95.4% 4.4% 100.0%
Table of Contents

Index to Financial Statements

TORCHMARK CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)
(Dollar amounts in thousands, except per share data)
 
Note 4—Investments (continued)

The following table represents changes in fixed maturities measured at fair value on a recurring basis using significant unobservable inputs (Level 3).
Analysis of Changes in Fair Value Measurements Using Significant
Unobservable Inputs (Level 3)
  
Analysis of Changes in Fair Value Measurements Using Significant
Unobservable Inputs (Level 3)
Collateralized
debt
Obligations
 Corporates Total
Asset-
backed
securities
 
Collateralized
debt
Obligations
 Corporates Total
Balance at January 1, 2014$58,205
 $300,300
 $358,505
Total gains or losses:     
Included in realized gains/losses15,924
 1
 15,925
Included in other comprehensive income3,323
 27,864
 31,187
Acquisitions
 186,366
 186,366
Sales(16,049) (1) (16,050)
Amortization5,519
 13
 5,532
Other(1)
(3,690) (1,829) (5,519)
Transfers into (out of) Level 3
 
 
Balance at December 31, 201463,232
 512,714
 575,946
Balance at January 1, 2015$
 $63,232
 $512,714
 $575,946
Total gains or losses:            
Included in realized gains/losses
 1,182
 1,182

 
 1,182
 1,182
Included in other comprehensive income11,365
 (11,925) (560)
 11,365
 (11,925) (560)
Acquisitions
 38,600
 38,600

 
 38,600
 38,600
Sales
 
 

 
 
 
Amortization5,536
 17
 5,553

 5,536
 17
 5,553
Other(1)
(9,751) (9,782) (19,533)
 (9,751) (9,782) (19,533)
Transfers into (out of) Level 3(2)
 
 

 
 
 
Balance at December 31, 201570,382
 530,806
 601,188

 70,382
 530,806
 601,188
Total gains or losses:            
Included in realized gains/losses
 788
 788

 
 788
 788
Included in other comprehensive income(3,943) 6,403
 2,460

 (3,943) 6,403
 2,460
Acquisitions
 33,662
 33,662

 
 33,662
 33,662
Sales
 
 

 
 
 
Amortization5,186
 17
 5,203

 5,186
 17
 5,203
Other(1)
(8,122) (12,076) (20,198)
 (8,122) (12,076) (20,198)
Transfers into (out of) Level 3
 
 
Transfers into (out of) Level 3(2)
 
 
 
Balance at December 31, 2016$63,503
 $559,600
 $623,103

 63,503
 559,600
 623,103
Total gains or losses:       
Included in realized gains/losses
 
 
 
Included in other comprehensive income410
 9,654
 10,900
 20,964
Acquisitions14,000
 
 21,666
 35,666
Sales
 
 
 
Amortization
 4,914
 17
 4,931
Other(1)
(361) (6,490) (9,373) (16,224)
Transfers into (out of) Level 3(2)

 
 
 
Balance at December 31, 2017$14,049
 $71,581
 $582,810
 $668,440

(1) Includes foreign exchange adjustments and principal repayments. 
(2) There were no transfers in or out of Level 3 during the three years ended 2017.
Acquisitions of Level 3 investments in each of the years 20142015 through 20162017 are comprised of private-placement fixed maturities managed by an unaffiliated third-party. See Note 1—Significant Accounting Policies for more information on private placements.
 

74
TMK 2017 FORM 10-K

Index to Financial StatementsTable of Contents


TORCHMARK CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)
(Dollar amounts in thousands, except per share data)
 
Note 4—Investments (continued)

Quantitative Information about Level 3
Fair Value Measurements
As of December 31, 20162017

Fair Value Valuation
Techniques
 Unobservable
Input
 Range Weighted
Average
Fair Value Valuation
Techniques
 Significant Unobservable
Input
 Range Weighted
Average
Asset-backed securities$14,049
 Determination of credit spread Credit
rating
 BBB BBB



 Discounted cash flows Discount
rate
 5.35% 5.35%
Collateralized debt obligations$63,503
 Discounted cash flows Discount
rate
 9.3 - 10.45% 10.3%71,581
 Discounted cash flows Discount
rate
 7.0 - 8.25% 8.03%
Private placement fixed maturities559,600
 Determination of credit spread Credit
rating
 A+ to B BBB$582,810
 Determination of credit spread Credit
rating
 A+ to BB- BBB
Discounted cash flows Discount
rate
 2.82 - 6.55% 4.17%

$623,103
   Discounted cash flows Discount
rate
 2.97 - 7.27% 3.93%

$668,440
 

The private placement fixed maturities and asset-backed securities reported as Level 3 are managed by third party investment managers. These securities are valued based on the contractual cash flows discounted by a yield determined as a treasury benchmark adjusted for a credit spread. The credit spread is developed from observable indices for similar public fixed maturities and unobservable indices for private fixed maturities for corresponding credit ratings. However, the credit ratings for the securities are considered unobservable inputs, as they are assigned by the third party investment manager based on a quantitative and qualitative assessment of the credit underwritten. A higher (lower) credit rating would result in a higher (lower) valuation.

The collateral underlying collateralized debt obligations for which fair values are reported as Level 3 consists primarily of trust preferred securities issued by banks and insurance companies. Collateralized debt obligations are valued at the present value of expected future cash flows using an unobservable discount rate. Expected cash flows are determined by scheduling the projected repayment of the collateral assuming no future defaults, deferrals, or recoveries. The discount rate is risk-adjusted to take these items into account. A significant increase (decrease) in the discount rate will produce a significant decrease (increase) in fair value. Additionally, a significant increase (decrease) in the cash flow expectations would result in a significant increase (decrease) in fair value.
The private placement fixed maturities are valued based on the contractual cash flows discounted by a yield determined as a treasury benchmark adjusted for a credit spread. The credit spread is developed from observable indices for similar public fixed maturities and unobservable indices for private fixed maturities for corresponding credit ratings. However, the credit ratings for the private placements are considered unobservable inputs, as they are assigned by the third party investment manager based on a quantitative and qualitative assessment of the credit underwritten. A higher (lower) credit rating would result in a higher (lower) valuation. For more information regarding valuation procedures, please refer to Note 1—Significant Accounting Policies under the caption Fair Value Measurements, Investments in Securities.
 
The following table presents transfers in and out of each of the valuation levels of fair values.
2016 2015 20142017 2016 2015
In Out Net In Out Net In Out NetIn Out Net In Out Net In Out Net
Level 1$45,344
 $
 $45,344
 $17,252
 $(49,744) $(32,492) $36,468
 $
 $36,468
$42,372
 $(597) $41,775
 $45,344
 $
 $45,344
 $17,252
 $(49,744) $(32,492)
Level 2
 (45,344) (45,344) 49,744
 (17,252) 32,492
 
 (36,468) (36,468)597
 (42,372) (41,775) 
 (45,344) (45,344) 49,744
 (17,252) 32,492
Level 3
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Transfers into Level 2 from Level 3 result from the availability of observable market data when a security is valued at the end of a period. Transfers into Level 3 occur when there is a lack of observable market information. Transfers into Level 1 from Level 2 occur when direct quotes are available; transfers from Level 1 into Level 2 result when only observable market data and no direct quotes are available. Transfers between levels are recognized as of the end of the period of transfer.


75
TMK 2017 FORM 10-K

Table of Contents


TORCHMARK CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)
(Dollar amounts in thousands, except per share data)
Note 4—Investments (continued)

Other-than-temporary impairments (OTTI): Based on the Company's evaluation of its fixed maturities available for sale in an unrealized loss position in accordance with the OTTI policy as described in Note 1—Significant Accounting Policies, the Company concluded that there were nowas an other-than-temporary impairmentsimpairment of $245 thousand ($159 thousand, net of tax) during the threeyear ended December 31, 2017. For the two years ended December 31, 2016. 2016, there were no other-than-temporary impairments.

As of year end 2016,2017, previously written down securities remaining in the portfolio were carried at a fair value of $54$59 million, or less than 0.4% of the fair value of the fixed maturity portfolio. Torchmark is continuously monitoring the market conditions impacting its portfolio. While adverse market conditions for an extended duration could lead to some

Index to Financial Statements

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)
(Dollar amounts in thousands except per share data)
Note 4—Investments (continued)

ratings downgrades in certain sectors, Torchmark has the ability and intent to hold these investments to recovery, and does not intend to sell or expect to be required to sell any of its securities in such a position.
 

76
TMK 2017 FORM 10-K

Table of Contents


TORCHMARK CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)
(Dollar amounts in thousands, except per share data)
Note 4—Investments (continued)

Unrealized gains/loss analysis: The following tables disclose gross unrealized investment losses by class and major sector of investments at December 31, 20162017 and December 31, 20152016 for the respective periods of time in a loss position. Torchmark considers these investments to be only temporarily impaired.
 
ANALYSIS OF GROSS UNREALIZED INVESTMENT LOSSES
At December 31, 20162017
Less than
Twelve Months
 
Twelve Months
or Longer
 Total
Less than
Twelve Months
 
Twelve Months
or Longer
 Total
Description of Securities
Fair
Value
 
Unrealized
Loss
 Fair Value 
Unrealized
Loss
 Fair Value 
Unrealized
Loss
Fair
Value
 
Unrealized
Loss
 Fair Value 
Unrealized
Loss
 Fair Value 
Unrealized
Loss
Fixed maturities available for sale:          ��           
Investment grade securities:                      
U.S. Government direct, guaranteed, and government-sponsored enterprises$321,133
 $(8,553) $1,404
 $(598) $322,537
 $(9,151)$34,388
 $(422) $47,514
 $(951) $81,902
 $(1,373)
States, municipalities and political subdivisions32,178
 (1,114) 683
 (19) 32,861
 (1,133)4,561
 (21) 1,771
 (9) 6,332
 (30)
Foreign governments4,416
 (62) 
 
 4,416
 (62)
 
 
 
 
 
Corporates, by sector:

 

 

 

 

 

        

 

Financial479,669
 (18,666) 64,335
 (4,627) 544,004
 (23,293)133,080
 (652) 35,302
 (1,429) 168,382
 (2,081)
Utilities290,732
 (11,000) 16,977
 (1,604) 307,709
 (12,604)48,562
 (569) 32,345
 (729) 80,907
 (1,298)
Energy83,064
 (1,076) 154,908
 (18,127) 237,972
 (19,203)23,463
 (81) 67,775
 (3,682) 91,238
 (3,763)
Metals and mining5,936
 (231) 5,789
 (187) 11,725
 (418)
 
 
 
 
 
Other corporate sectors1,564,273
 (65,131) 68,968
 (6,495) 1,633,241
 (71,626)220,661
 (2,312) 163,886
 (4,257) 384,547
 (6,569)
Total corporates2,423,674
 (96,104) 310,977
 (31,040) 2,734,651
 (127,144)425,766
 (3,614) 299,308
 (10,097) 725,074
 (13,711)
Other asset-backed securities41,498
 (337) 
 
 41,498
 (337)
 
 
 
 
 
Redeemable preferred stocks, by sector:                      
Utilities5,857
 (244) 
 
 5,857
 (244)
 
 5,953
 (97) 5,953
 (97)
Total redeemable preferred stocks5,857
 (244) 
 
 5,857
 (244)
 
 5,953
 (97) 5,953
 (97)
Total investment grade securities2,828,756
 (106,414) 313,064
 (31,657) 3,141,820
 (138,071)464,715
 (4,057) 354,546
 (11,154) 819,261
 (15,211)
                      
Below investment grade securities:                      
States, municipalities and political subdivisions
 
 357
 (194) 357
 (194)200
 (105) 
 
 200
 (105)
Corporates, by sector:

 

 
 
    

 

 

 

    
Financial
 
 83,174
 (22,592) 83,174
 (22,592)
 
 84,432
 (21,311) 84,432
 (21,311)
Energy15,567
 (385) 91,165
 (24,736) 106,732
 (25,121)8,114
 (104) 75,204
 (21,525) 83,318
 (21,629)
Metals and mining32,478
 (172) 34,463
 (2,023) 66,941
 (2,195)
 
 
 
 
 
Other corporate sectors51,640
 (291) 95,679
 (10,017) 147,319
 (10,308)25,334
 (5,066) 54,383
 (8,981) 79,717
 (14,047)
Total corporates99,685
 (848) 304,481
 (59,368) 404,166
 (60,216)33,448
 (5,170) 214,019
 (51,817) 247,467
 (56,987)
Collateralized debt obligations
 
 9,714
 (10,285) 9,714
 (10,285)
 
 12,347
 (7,653) 12,347
 (7,653)
Redeemable preferred stocks, by sector:                      
Financial
 
 19,912
 (7,218) 19,912
 (7,218)
 
 24,376
 (2,727) 24,376
 (2,727)
Total redeemable preferred stocks
 
 19,912
 (7,218) 19,912
 (7,218)
 
 24,376
 (2,727) 24,376
 (2,727)
Total below investment grade securities99,685
 (848) 334,464
 (77,065) 434,149
 (77,913)33,648
 (5,275) 250,742
 (62,197) 284,390
 (67,472)
Total fixed maturities$2,928,441
 $(107,262) $647,528
 $(108,722) $3,575,969
 $(215,984)$498,363
 $(9,332) $605,288
 $(73,351) $1,103,651
 $(82,683)
 

77
TMK 2017 FORM 10-K

Index to Financial StatementsTable of Contents


TORCHMARK CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)
(Dollar amounts in thousands, except per share data)
 
Note 4—Investments (continued)

ANALYSIS OF GROSS UNREALIZED INVESTMENT LOSSES
At December 31, 20152016
Less than
Twelve Months
 
Twelve Months
or Longer
 Total
Less than
Twelve Months
 
Twelve Months
or Longer
 Total
Description of SecuritiesFair Value 
Unrealized
Loss
 
Fair
Value
 
Unrealized
Loss
 Fair Value 
Unrealized
Loss
Fair Value 
Unrealized
Loss
 
Fair
Value
 
Unrealized
Loss
 Fair Value 
Unrealized
Loss
Fixed maturities available for sale:                      
Investment grade securities:                      
U.S. Government direct, guaranteed, and government-sponsored enterprises$310,676
 $(13,196) $14,731
 $(882) $325,407
 $(14,078)$321,133
 $(8,553) $1,404
 $(598) $322,537
 $(9,151)
States, municipalities and political subdivisions55,351
 (1,611) 671
 (42) 56,022
 (1,653)32,178
 (1,114) 683
 (19) 32,861
 (1,133)
Foreign governments7,302
 (163) 
 
 7,302
 (163)4,416
 (62) 
 
 4,416
 (62)
Corporates, by sector:
 
 
 
 
 

 
 
 
 
 
Financial476,469
 (18,599) 
 
 476,469
 (18,599)479,669
 (18,666) 64,335
 (4,627) 544,004
 (23,293)
Utilities435,692
 (28,267) 
 
 435,692
 (28,267)290,732
 (11,000) 16,977
 (1,604) 307,709
 (12,604)
Energy745,969
 (146,157) 81,681
 (41,412) 827,650
 (187,569)83,064
 (1,076) 154,908
 (18,127) 237,972
 (19,203)
Metals and mining225,273
 (50,857) 25,831
 (11,552) 251,104
 (62,409)5,936
 (231) 5,789
 (187) 11,725
 (418)
Other corporate sectors1,615,515
 (113,185) 35,684
 (6,661) 1,651,199
 (119,846)1,564,273
 (65,131) 68,968
 (6,495) 1,633,241
 (71,626)
Total corporates3,498,918
 (357,065) 143,196
 (59,625) 3,642,114
 (416,690)2,423,674
 (96,104) 310,977
 (31,040) 2,734,651
 (127,144)
Other asset-backed securities41,498
 (337) 
 
 41,498
 (337)
Redeemable preferred stocks, by sector:                      
Utilities7,763
 (52) 
 
 7,763
 (52)5,857
 (244) 
 
 5,857
 (244)
Total redeemable preferred stocks7,763
 (52) 
 
 7,763
 (52)5,857
 (244) 
 
 5,857
 (244)
Total investment grade securities3,880,010
 (372,087) 158,598
 (60,549) 4,038,608
 (432,636)2,828,756
 (106,414) 313,064
 (31,657) 3,141,820
 (138,071)
                      
Below investment grade securities:                      
States, municipalities and political subdivisions
 
 299
 (255) 299
 (255)
 
 357
 (194) 357
 (194)
Corporates, by sector:                      
Financial
 
 69,506
 (36,282) 69,506
 (36,282)
 
 83,174
 (22,592) 83,174
 (22,592)
Energy7,979
 (1,854) 61,175
 (29,678) 69,154
 (31,532)15,567
 (385) 91,165
 (24,736) 106,732
 (25,121)
Metals and mining4,551
 (5,414) 17,679
 (22,247) 22,230
 (27,661)32,478
 (172) 34,463
 (2,023) 66,941
 (2,195)
Other corporate sectors81,368
 (12,492) 63,307
 (8,503) 144,675
 (20,995)51,640
 (291) 95,679
 (10,017) 147,319
 (10,308)
Total corporates93,898
 (19,760) 211,667
 (96,710) 305,565
 (116,470)99,685
 (848) 304,481
 (59,368) 404,166
 (60,216)
Collateralized debt obligations
 
 10,562
 (9,438) 10,562
 (9,438)
 
 9,714
 (10,285) 9,714
 (10,285)
Redeemable preferred stocks, by sector:                      
Financial
 
 22,374
 (4,781) 22,374
 (4,781)
 
 19,912
 (7,218) 19,912
 (7,218)
Total redeemable preferred stocks
 
 22,374
 (4,781) 22,374
 (4,781)
 
 19,912
 (7,218) 19,912
 (7,218)
Total below investment grade securities93,898
 (19,760) 244,902
 (111,184) 338,800
 (130,944)99,685
 (848) 334,464
 (77,065) 434,149
 (77,913)
Total fixed maturities$3,973,908
 $(391,847) $403,500
 $(171,733) $4,377,408
 $(563,580)$2,928,441
 $(107,262) $647,528
 $(108,722) $3,575,969
 $(215,984)
 
Gross unrealized losses decreased from $564 million at year end 2015 to $216 million at year end 2016 to $83 million at year end 2017, a decrease of $348$133 million. The decrease in the gross unrealized losses from prior year was primarily attributable to the improved conditions during 20162017 in the energy sector and metals and miningbroadly across all sectors.



78
TMK 2017 FORM 10-K

Index to Financial StatementsTable of Contents


TORCHMARK CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)
(Dollar amounts in thousands, except per share data)
 
Note 4—Investments (continued)

Additional information about investmentsfixed maturities available for sale in an unrealized loss position is as follows:

Less than
Twelve
Months
 Twelve
Months
or Longer
 TotalLess than
Twelve
Months
 Twelve
Months
or Longer
 Total
Number of issues (CUSIP numbers) held:
 
  
 
  
As of December 31, 201792
 102
 194
As of December 31, 2016407
 94
 501
407
 94
 501
As of December 31, 2015480
 75
 555
 
Torchmark’s entire fixed maturity portfolio consisted of 1,502 issues at December 31, 2017 and 1,565 issues at December 31, 2016 and 2015.2016. The weighted-average quality rating of all unrealized loss positions at amortized cost was BBB- for 2017 and BBB+ for both 2016 and 2015.2016.

Other investment information:
 
Other long-term investments consist of the following:
Year Ended December 31,Year Ended December 31,
2016 20152017 2016
Investment in limited partnerships$51,509

$31,409
$66,522
 $51,509
Low-income housing interests
 3,767
Commercial mortgage participations(1)
39,489
 
Other2,343
 3,262
2,548
 2,343
Total$53,852
 $38,438
$108,559
 $53,852

(1) A mortgage participation is a legal right to a prorata interest in a mortgage loan.
 
Torchmark did not have any invested assets that were non-income producing during the twelve months ended December 31, 2016.2017.

Concentrations of Credit Risk: Torchmark maintains a diversified investment portfolio with limited concentration in any given issuer. At December 31, 2016,2017, the investment portfolio, at fair value, consisted of the following:
Investment grade fixed maturities: 
Corporate securities8082%
Securities of state and municipal governments97
Government-sponsored enterprises2
Other1
Below investment grade fixed maturities: 
Corporate securities43
Other1
Policy loans, which are secured by the underlying insurance policy values3
Other investments1
 100%

As of December 31, 2016,2017, securities of state and municipal governments represented 9%7% of invested assets at fair value. Such investments are made throughout the U.S. At year end 2016,yearend 2017, the state and municipal bond portfolio at fair value was invested in securities issued within the following states: Texas (30%(29%), Ohio (7%(9%), Washington (7%(8%), Illinois (6%(7%), Michigan (5%), and AlabamaGeorgia (5%). Otherwise, there was no concentration within any given state greater than 5%.


79
TMK 2017 FORM 10-K

Index to Financial StatementsTable of Contents


TORCHMARK CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)
(Dollar amounts in thousands, except per share data)
 
Note 4—Investments (continued)

Corporate debt securities and redeemable preferred stocks represent 84%85% of Torchmark's investment portfolio. These investments are spread across a wide range of industries. Below are the ten largest industry concentrations held in the corporate portfolio of corporate debt securities and redeemable preferred stocks at December 31, 2016,2017, based on fair value:
Insurance1716%
Electric utilities12
Oil and natural gas pipelines67
Banks6
Transportation4
Oil and natural gas exploration and production4
TransportationChemicals4
ChemicalsReal estate investment trusts4
Food3
Metals and mining3
Food3
Real estate investment trusts3
 
At year end 2016,yearend 2017, 4% of invested assets at fair value were represented by fixed maturities rated below investment grade. Par value of these investments was $834$790 million, amortized cost was $751$702 million, and fair value was $695$679 million. While these investments could be subject to additional credit risk, such risk should generally be reflected in their fair value.

Note 5—Deferred Acquisition Costs
 
An analysis of deferred acquisition costsDAC is as follows:
Year Ended December 31,Year Ended December 31,
2016 2015 20142017 2016 2015
Balance at beginning of year$3,617,135
 $3,457,397
 $3,325,433
$3,783,158
 $3,617,135
 $3,457,397
Additions:          
Deferred during period:          
Commissions436,252
 401,166
 358,969
465,920
 436,252
 401,166
Other expenses199,066
 211,015
 203,276
194,214
 199,066
 211,015
Total deferred635,318
 612,181
 562,245
660,134
 635,318
 612,181
Foreign exchange adjustment2,180
 
 
5,712
 2,180
 
Adjustment attributable to unrealized investment losses(1)

 8,682
 

 
 8,682
Total additions637,498
 620,863
 562,245
665,846
 637,498
 620,863
Deductions:          
Amortized during period(469,063) (445,625) (415,914)(490,403) (469,063) (445,625)
Foreign exchange adjustment
 (15,500) (8,167)
 
 (15,500)
Adjustment attributable to unrealized investment gains(1)
(2,412) 
 (6,200)(538) (2,412) 
Total deductions(471,475) (461,125) (430,281)(490,941) (471,475) (461,125)
Balance at end of year$3,783,158
 $3,617,135
 $3,457,397
$3,958,063
 $3,783,158
 $3,617,135
(1)Represents amounts pertaining to investments relating to universal life-type products.

80
TMK 2017 FORM 10-K

Index to Financial Statements
Table of Contents


TORCHMARK CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)
(Dollar amounts in thousands, except per share data)

Note 6—Discontinued Operations

At December 31, 2015, Torchmark met the criteria to account for its Medicare Part D Prescription Drug Plan business as a discontinued operation. Historically, the business was a reportable segment. Effective July 1, 2016, Torchmark sold its Medicare Part D Prescription Drug Plan business to an unaffiliated third party. Management believes this sale allows the Company to better focus on its core protection life and health insurance businesses, as well as provides additional capital to invest.

The initial sale price was based on the number of enrollees as of the end of the second quarter 2016 and will be adjusted based on the number of enrollees as of January 1, 2017 as determined by the Center for Medicare Services (CMS) in March 2017. Estimated ultimate net proceeds from the sale resulted in a net gain of $1.8 million ($1.2 million net of tax). in 2016. The deferred acquisition costs write-off of $16.4 million and the contingent sale price reserve of $3.6 million are included in the net gain calculation. The gain is recognized in incomeoperating results from discontinued operations as ofare reflected in income for the twelve months ended December 31, 2016.

Torchmark retained certain assets and liabilities related to the Medicare Part D business including all corresponding profits or losses for the 2016 plan year. The buyer assumed the rights and obligations related to the business for all subsequent plan years. To facilitate a seamless transition, Torchmark administered the plans for the duration of 2016.2017. The remaining assets and liabilities reflected on the Torchmark balance sheet related to discontinued operations are receivables and payables primarily associated with the 2016 and prior plan yearyears that are expected to be settled in the ordinary course of business during 2017 and 2018.

The net assets related to discontinued operations at December 31, 20162017 and 20152016 were as follows:
At December 31,At December 31,
2016 20152017 2016
Assets:      
Due premiums$8,840
 $8,041
$3,945
 $8,840
Other receivables(1)
118,692
 287,765
64,575
 118,692
Deferred acquisition costs
 17,037
Total assets related to discontinued operations127,532
 312,843
68,520
 127,532
      
Liabilities:      
Unearned and advance premiums67
 806
Policy claims and other benefits payable10,868
 12,309
Risk sharing payable8,374
 23,837
8,731
 8,374
Current and deferred income taxes payable3,820
 13,604
1,077
 3,820
Other(2)
4,295
 479
40,046
 15,230
Total liabilities related to discontinued operations27,424
 51,035
49,854
 27,424
      
Net assets$100,108
 $261,808
$18,666
 $100,108

(1)At December 31, 2016,2017, other receivables included $65 million from Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS). At December 31, 2016, the comparable amounts were $50 million from CMS and $69 million from drug manufacturer rebates. At December 31, 2015, the comparable amounts were $193 million and $95 million, respectively.
(2)BalanceAt December 31, 2017, the balance included $37.3 million due to CMS. At December 31, 2016, the balance includes $3.6 million contingent sale price reserve for the year ended December 31, 2016.reserve.


81
TMK 2017 FORM 10-K

Index to Financial StatementsTable of Contents


TORCHMARK CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)
(Dollar amounts in thousands, except per share data)

Note 6—Discontinued Operations (continued)


Income from discontinued operations for the three years ended December 31, 20162017 is as follows:
Year Ended December 31,Year Ended December 31,
2016 2015 20142017 2016 2015
Revenue:          
Health premium$222,840
 $260,657
 $373,280
$
 $222,840
 $260,657
          
Benefits and expenses:          
Health policyholder benefits183,423
 213,114
 315,816
3,827
 183,423
 213,114
Amortization of deferred acquisition costs3,747
 3,506
 2,858

 3,747
 3,506
Commissions, premium taxes, and non-deferred acquisition expenses16,396
 20,909
 26,613
763
 16,396
 20,909
Other operating expense5,377
 6,502
 5,123
1,209
 5,377
 6,502
Total benefits and expenses208,943
 244,031
 350,410
5,799
 208,943
 244,031
          
Income before income taxes for discontinued operations13,897
 16,626
 22,870
(5,799) 13,897
 16,626
Gain from sale of discontinued operations1,779
 
 

 1,779
 
Income taxes(5,487) (5,819) (8,005)2,030
 (5,487) (5,819)
Income from discontinued operations$10,189
 $10,807
 $14,865
$(3,769) $10,189
 $10,807
 
Income taxes paid related to discontinued operations for the three years ended December 31, 20162017 were as follows:
 Year Ended December 31,
 2016 2015 2014
Income taxes paid$15,271
 $3,409
 $12,013

 Year Ended December 31,
 2017 2016 2015
Income taxes paid$714
 $15,271
 $3,409

Note 7—Liability for Unpaid Claims
 
Activity in the liability for unpaid health claims is summarized as follows:
Year Ended December 31,Year Ended December 31,
2016 2015 20142017 2016 2015
Balance at beginning of year$137,120
 $128,265
 $116,559
$143,128
 $137,120
 $128,265
Incurred related to:          
Current year510,075
 502,009
 453,014
520,528
 510,075
 502,009
Prior years(1,127) (7,845) 804
(8,048) (1,127) (7,845)
Total incurred508,948
 494,164
 453,818
512,480
 508,948
 494,164
Paid related to:          
Current year386,278
 379,037
 343,648
394,506
 386,278
 379,037
Prior years116,662
 106,272
 98,464
114,237
 116,662
 106,272
Total paid502,940
 485,309
 442,112
508,743
 502,940
 485,309
Balance at end of year$143,128
 $137,120
 $128,265
$146,865
 $143,128
 $137,120
 

82
TMK 2017 FORM 10-K

Table of Contents


TORCHMARK CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)
(Dollar amounts in thousands except per share data)

Note 7—Liability for Unpaid Claims (continued)

At the end of each period, the liability for unpaid health claims includes an estimate of claims incurred but not yet reported to the Company. Such estimates are updated regularly based upon the Company’s most recent claims data

Index to Financial Statements

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)
(Dollar amounts in thousands except per share data)

with recognition of emerging experience trends. Because of the nature of the Company’s health business, the payment lags are relatively short and most claims are fully paid within a year from the time incurred. Fluctuations in claims experience can lead to either over or under estimation of the liability for any given year. The difference between the estimate made at the end of the prior period and the actual experience during the period is reflected above under the caption “Incurred related to: Prior years.”
 
The liability for unpaid health claims is included withwithin “Policy claims and other benefits payable” in the Consolidated Balance Sheets.

Short-Duration Contracts

Although Torchmark primarily sells long-duration contracts for both life and health, the Company also has a limited amount of group health products that qualify as short-duration contracts in accordance with the applicable guidance.

The belowfollowing table illustrates the total incurred claims for short-duration products over the last five years.years for the year ended December 31, 2017. Claim frequency is determined by duration and incurred date.
For the years ended December 31, As of December 31, 2016For the years ended December 31, 2017 As of December 31, 2017
Cumulative incurred claims(1)
 Total of incurred-but-not-reported liabilities plus expected development on reported claims 
Cumulative number of reported claims(1)
Cumulative incurred claims(1)
 Total of incurred-but-not-reported liabilities plus expected development on reported claims 
Cumulative number of reported claims(1)
(In thousands)
Accident Year2012 2013 2014 2015 2016    2013 2014 2015 2016 2017    
2012$84,975
 $83,965
 $83,928
 $83,906
 $83,906
 $
 1,357
2013
 84,111
 82,644
 83,151
 83,119
 
 1,337
$84,111
 $82,644
 $83,151
 $83,119
 $83,103
 $
 1,337
2014
 
 101,407
 99,876
 99,810
 19
 1,600
  101,407
 99,876
 99,810
 99,777
 
 1,600
2015
 
 
 141,667
 141,460
 478
 2,222
    141,667
 141,460
 141,259
 17
 2,224
2016
 
 
 
 140,944
 26,224
 1,863
      140,944
 138,899
 431
 2,158
2017        134,677
 24,259
 1,765

      Total
 $549,239
 $26,721
        Total
 $597,715
 $24,707
  
(1)The incurred claims and cumulative number of reported claims for all years prior to 20162017 are unaudited.


83
TMK 2017 FORM 10-K

Index to Financial StatementsTable of Contents


TORCHMARK CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)
(Dollar amounts in thousands except per share data)

Note 7—Liability for Unpaid Claims (continued)

This table illustrates the total cumulative paid claims and allocated claims for short-duration products over the last five years:years for the year ended December 31, 2017.
 
Cumulative paid claims(1)
 
Cumulative paid claims(1)
 For the years ended December 31, For the years ended December 31,
Accident Year 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017
2012 $68,742
 $83,766
 $83,919
 $83,906
 $83,906
2013 
 68,159
 82,408
 83,131
 83,119
 $68,159
 $82,408
 $83,131
 $83,119
 $83,103
2014 
 
 81,054
 99,545
 99,791
   81,054
 99,545
 99,791
 99,777
2015 
 
 
 115,922
 140,982
     115,922
 140,982
 141,242
2016 
 
 
 
 114,720
       114,720
 138,468
2017         110,418

       Total
 522,518
       Total
 573,008
Short-duration claim liability as of December 31, 2016  26,721
Short-duration claim liability as of December 31, 2017Short-duration claim liability as of December 31, 2017  24,707
   Total incurred claims & IBNR  $549,239
   Total incurred claims & IBNR  $597,715
(1)The cumulative paid claims for all years prior to 20162017 are unaudited.

Below is the reconciliation of the net incurred and paid claims development tables to the liability for "Policy"Policy claims and other benefits payable" in the Consolidated Balance Sheets.
December 31, 2016December 31, 2017 December 31, 2016
Policy claims and other benefits payable:
   
Short-duration products$26,721
$24,707
 $26,721
Insurance lines other than short duration—health116,407
122,158
 116,407
Total health146,865
 143,128
Insurance lines other than short duration—life156,437
186,429
 156,437
Total policy claims and other benefits payable$299,565
$333,294
 $299,565

Index to Financial Statements

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)
(Dollar amounts in thousands except per share data)

Note 8—Income Taxes
 
The components of income taxes were as follows:
Year Ended December 31,Year Ended December 31,
2016 2015 20142017 2016 2015
Income tax expense from continuing operations(1)
$232,645
 $249,894
 $256,603
Income tax expense (benefit) from continuing operations$(627,615) $232,645
 $249,894
     
Shareholders’ equity:          
Other comprehensive income (loss)186,206
 (411,646) 424,089
318,475
 186,206
 (411,646)
Tax basis compensation expense (from the exercise of stock options and vesting of restricted stock awards) in excess of amounts recognized for financial reporting purposes (1)

 (17,577) (18,524)
Tax basis compensation expense (from the exercise of stock options and vesting of restricted stock awards) in excess of amounts recognized for financial reporting purposes
 
 (17,577)
$418,851
 $(179,329) $662,168
$(309,140) $418,851
 $(179,329)
 
(1)
Due to the adoption of ASU 2016-09, the excess tax benefits related to share-based awards are now recorded through income tax expense rather than additional paid in capital as described in Note 1—Significant Accounting Policiesunder "Stock Compensation."

84
TMK 2017 FORM 10-K

Table of Contents


TORCHMARK CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)
(Dollar amounts in thousands except per share data)
Note 8—Income Taxes (continued)

Income tax (benefit) expense from continuing operations consists of:
 Year Ended December 31,
 2016 2015 2014
Current income tax expense$132,806
 $174,284
 $169,319
Deferred income tax expense99,839
 75,610
 87,284
 $232,645
 $249,894
 $256,603
 Year Ended December 31,
 2017 2016 2015
Current income tax (benefit) expense$138,262
 $132,806
 $174,284
Deferred income tax (benefit) expense(765,877) 99,839
 75,610
 $(627,615) $232,645
 $249,894
 
In each of the years 20142015 through 2016,2017, deferred income tax (benefit) expense was incurred because of certain differences between net income before income taxes as reported on the Consolidated Statements of Operations and taxable income as reported on Torchmark’s income tax returns. As explained in Note 1—Significant Accounting Policies, these differences caused the financial statement book values of some assets and liabilities to be different from their respective tax bases.

As discussed in Note 1—Significant Accounting Policies, due to the passage of the Tax Legislation before December 31, 2017, the Company recorded $877 million reduction in deferred income tax expense related to a one-time adjustment to reduce its net deferred tax liability as of December 22, 2017, as required by ASC 740 Income Taxes, due to the reduction in the income tax rate. This adjustment to the Company's net deferred tax liability included $252 million related to items included in AOCI.

Although many aspects of the Tax Legislation are not effective until 2018, the Company recorded a reasonable estimate for the tax reform adjustment in accordance with SAB 118. We will continue to analyze relevant information to complete our accounting for income taxes which may result in an adjustment to our estimate in 2018. The accounting is expected to be complete when the 2017 U.S. corporate income tax return is filed later in 2018.

The effective income tax rate differed from the expected 35% rate as shown below:
 Year Ended December 31,
 2016 % 2015 % 2014 %
Expected income taxes$270,282
 35.0
 $268,165
 35.0
 $274,637
 35.0
Increase (reduction) in income taxes resulting from:           
Low income housing investments(18,202) (2.4) (19,031) (2.5) (17,541) (2.2)
Share-based awards(18,653) (2.4) 
 
 
 
Other(782) (0.1) 760
 0.1
 (493) 
Income tax expense from continuing operations$232,645
 30.1
 $249,894
 32.6
 $256,603
 32.8

The effective income tax rates for the year ended December 31, 2016 differed from the effective income tax rates for 2015 and 2014 primarily as a result of the Company adopting ASU 2016-09 as of January 1, 2016. As a result of the adoption, the excess tax benefits related to share-based awards are now recorded through income tax expense rather than additional paid-in capital. See Note 1—Significant Accounting Policies for further discussion.
 Year Ended December 31,
 2017 % 2016 % 2015 %
Expected income taxes$290,727
 35.0
 $270,282
 35.0
 $268,165
 35.0
Increase (reduction) in income taxes resulting from:           
Tax reform adjustment(877,400) (105.6) 
 
 
 
Low income housing investments(18,515) (2.2) (18,202) (2.4) (19,031) (2.5)
Share-based awards(19,549) (2.4) (18,653) (2.4) 
 
Other(2,878) (0.4) (782) (0.1) 760
 0.1
Income tax expense (benefit) from continuing operations$(627,615) (75.6) $232,645
 30.1
 $249,894
 32.6




85
TMK 2017 FORM 10-K

Index to Financial StatementsTable of Contents


TORCHMARK CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)
(Dollar amounts in thousands except per share data)
 
Note 8—Income Taxes (continued)

The tax effects of temporary differences that gave rise to significant portions of the deferred tax assets and deferred tax liabilities are presented below:
December 31,December 31,
2016 20152017 2016
Deferred tax assets:      
Fixed maturity investments$15,004
 $16,098
$8,692
 $15,004
Carryover of tax losses3,906
 2,266
4,760
 3,906
Total gross deferred tax assets18,910
 18,364
13,452
 18,910
Deferred tax liabilities:      
Unrealized gains315,509
 128,683
380,251
 315,509
Employee and agent compensation92,131
 83,229
65,576
 92,131
Deferred acquisition costs975,873
 921,799
618,889
 975,873
Future policy benefits, unearned and advance premiums, and policy claims391,451
 340,854
248,752
 391,451
Other liabilities3,987
 17,176
11,289
 3,987
Total gross deferred tax liabilities1,778,951
 1,491,741
1,324,757
 1,778,951
Net deferred tax liability$1,760,041
 $1,473,377
$1,311,305
 $1,760,041

Income Tax Return: Torchmark and its subsidiaries, excluding Family Heritage Life Insurance Company (Family Heritage), file a life-nonlife consolidated federal income tax return. Family Heritage files its federal income tax return on a separate company basis. Torchmark’s consolidated federal income tax returns are routinely audited by the Internal Revenue Service (IRS). The IRS completed its examination of Torchmark’s 2008-2011 consolidated income tax returns during 2014 resulting in no impact on the Company’s effective tax rate. The statutes of limitations for the Internal Revenue Service's examination and assessment of additional tax are closed for all tax years prior to 20132014 with respect to Torchmark’s consolidated and Family Heritage’s federal income tax returns. Management believes that adequate provision has been made in the consolidated financial statements for any potential assessments that may result from current or future tax examinations and other tax-related matters for all open years.
 
Valuations: Torchmark has net operating loss carryforwards of approximately $11.2$22.7 million at December 31, 20162017 which will begin to expire in 20322033 if not otherwise used to offset future taxable income. A valuation allowance is to be provided when it is more likely than not that deferred tax assets will not be realized by the Company. No valuation allowance has been recorded relating to Torchmark’s deferred tax assets as management believes Torchmark will more likely than not have sufficient taxable income in future periods to fully realize its existing deferred tax assets.

Torchmark’s tax liability is adjusted to include a provision for uncertain tax positions taken or expected to be taken in a tax return. However, during the years 20142015 through 2016,2017, Torchmark did not have any uncertain tax positions which resulted in unrecognized tax benefits.
 
Tax penalties:Torchmark’s continuing practice is to recognize interest and penalties related to income tax matters in income tax expense. The Company recognized interest income of $5 thousand, $9 thousand, $11 thousand, and $465$11 thousand, net of federal income tax expense, in its Consolidated Statements of Operations for 2017, 2016, 2015, and 2014,2015, respectively. The Company had no accrued interest or penalties at December 31, 20162017 or 2015.2016.


86
TMK 2017 FORM 10-K

Index to Financial Statements
Table of Contents


TORCHMARK CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)
(Dollar amounts in thousands, except per share data)

Note 9—Postretirement Benefits
 
Torchmark has qualified noncontributory defined benefit pension plans and contributory savings plans which cover substantially all employees. There are also two nonqualified noncontributory supplemental benefit pensionexecutive retirement plans (SERPs) which cover a limited number of employees. The total cost of these retirement plans charged to operations was as follows:
Year Ended December 31, 
Defined 
Contribution
Plans
(1)
 
Defined 
Benefit
Pension Plans
(2)
 
Defined 
Contribution
Plans
(1)
 
Defined 
Benefit
Pension Plans
(2)
2017 $4,145
 $28,828
2016 $3,614
 $24,202
 3,614
 24,202
2015 3,429
 29,230
 3,429
 29,230
2014 3,078
 23,463

(1) 401K plans
(2) Qualified pension plans and SERPs
 
Torchmark accrues expense for the defined contribution plans based on a percentage of the employees’ contributions. The plans are funded by the employee contributions and a Torchmark contribution equal to the amount of accrued expense. Plan contributions are both mandatory and discretionary, depending on the terms of the plan.
 
Pension Plans: Cost for the defined benefit pension plans has been calculated on the projected unit credit actuarial cost method. All plan measurements for the defined benefit plans are as of December 3131st of the respective year. The defined benefit pension plans covering the majority of employees are qualified and funded. Contributions are made to funded pension plans subject to minimums required by regulation and maximums allowed for tax purposes. Defined benefit plan contributions were $21.3 million in 2017, $15.8 million in 2016, and $15.5 million in 2015, and $14.6 million in 2014.2015. Torchmark estimates as of December 31, 20162017 that it will contribute an amount notin the range of $30 million to exceed $20$40 million to these plans in 2017.2018. The actual amount of contribution may be different from this estimate.

Torchmark has two SERPs, one of which is active and provides to a limited number of executives an additional supplemental defined pension benefit. The supplemental benefit is based on the participant’s qualified plan benefit without consideration to the regulatory limits on compensation and benefit payments applicable to qualified plans, except that eligible compensation is capped at $1 million. This SERP is nonqualified and unfunded. However, a Rabbi Trust has been established to support the liability for this plan. This trust consists of life insurance policies on the lives of plan participants with an unaffiliated insurance carrier as well as an investment account.

The following table includes activity for the active SERP for the three years ended December 31, 2016.
 Year Ended December 31,
 2016 2015 2014
Premiums paid for insurance coverage$2,050
 $10,068
 $2,150
      
 December 31,  
 2016 2015  
Total investments of this SERP:     
Company owned life insurance$37,267
 $34,178
  
Exchange Traded Funds(1)
48,999
 45,014
  
 $86,266
 $79,192
  
      
Liability for this SERP$74,687
 $67,243
  

(1)There were no deposits in 2016, 2015 or 2014.

Index to Financial Statements

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)
(Dollar amounts in thousands except per share data)
Note 9—Postretirement Benefits (continued)


BecauseSince this plan is nonqualified, the investments and the policyholder value of the insurance policies in the Rabbi Trust are not included as defined benefit plan assets, but rather assets of the Company. They are included in “Other Assets” in the Consolidated Balance Sheets.

The second supplemental benefit pension plan is limited to a very select group of employees and was closed as of December 31, 1994. It provides the full benefits that an employee would have otherwise received from a defined benefit plan in the absence of the limitation on benefits payable under a qualified plan. This plan is also nonqualified and unfunded. Liability for this closed plan was $3 million at December 31, 2016 and December 31, 2015. Pension cost for both supplemental defined benefit plans is determined in the same manner as for the qualified defined benefit plans.


87
TMK 2017 FORM 10-K

Table of Contents


TORCHMARK CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)
(Dollar amounts in thousands, except per share data)
Note 9—Postretirement Benefits (continued)


The following table includes activity for the SERPs for the three years ended December 31, 2017.
 Year Ended December 31,
 2017 2016 2015
Premiums paid for insurance coverage$2,050
 $2,050
 $10,068
      
 December 31,  
 2017 2016  
Total investments:     
Company owned life insurance$40,273
 $37,267
  
Exchange traded funds55,442
 48,999
  
 $95,715
 $86,266
  
      
Liability:     
Active plan$81,457
 $74,687
  
Closed plan$3,008
 $3,220
  

Plan assets in the funded plans consist primarily of investments in marketable fixed maturities and equity securities and are valued at fair value. Torchmark measures the fair value of its financial assets, including the assets in its benefit plans, in accordance with accounting guidance which establishes a hierarchy for asset values and provides a methodology for the measurement of value. Please refer to Note 1—Significant Accounting Policies under the caption Fair Value Measurements, Investments in Securities for a complete discussion of valuation procedures. The following table presents the assets of Torchmark’s defined benefit pension plans for the years ended December 31, 20162017 and 2015.2016.

Pension Assets by Component at December 31, 2016
2017
Fair Value Determined by:    Fair Value Determined by:    
Quoted Prices in
Active Markets
for Identical
Assets (Level 1)
 
Significant
Observable
Inputs (Level 2)
 
Significant
Unobservable
Inputs (Level 3)
 
Total
Amount
 
% to
Total
Quoted Prices in
Active Markets
for Identical
Assets (Level 1)
 
Significant
Observable
Inputs (Level 2)
 
Significant
Unobservable
Inputs (Level 3)
 
Total
Amount
 
% to
Total
Corporate bonds:                
Financial$ $41,578
 $ $41,578
 13$ $43,451
 $ $43,451
 12
Utilities

 43,890
 

 43,890
 13

 46,144
 

 46,144
 12
Energy

 25,427
 

 25,427
 8

 25,023
 

 25,023
 7
Other corporates

 49,141
 

 49,141
 15

 65,888
 

 65,888
 17
Total corporate bonds
 160,036
 
 160,036
 49
 180,506
 
 180,506
 48
Exchange traded fund(1)
134,771
 

 

 134,771
 41164,351
 

 

 164,351
 43
Other bonds

 258
 

 258
 

 256
 

 256
 
Other long-term investments

 2,304
 

 2,304
 1
Guaranteed annuity contract(2)


 18,997
 

 18,997
 6

 21,202
 

 21,202
 6
Short-term investments7,391
 
 
 7,391
 23,984
 
 
 3,984
 1
Other7,418
 
 
 7,418
 25,021
 
 
 5,021
 1
Grand Total$149,580
 $179,291
 $
 $328,871
 100$173,356
 $204,268
 $
 $377,624
 100
(1)A fund including marketable securities that mirror the S&P 500 index.
(2)Representing a guaranteed annuity contract issued by Torchmark's subsidiary, American Income Life Insurance Company, to fund the obligations of the American Income Pension Plan.

88
TMK 2017 FORM 10-K

Table of Contents


Index to Financial Statements

TORCHMARK CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)
(Dollar amounts in thousands, except per share data)
 
Note 9—Postretirement Benefits (continued)



Pension Assets by Component at December 31, 20152016
Fair Value Determined by:    Fair Value Determined by:    
Quoted Prices in
Active Markets
for Identical
Assets (Level 1)
 
Significant
Observable
Inputs (Level 2)
 
Significant
Unobservable
Inputs (Level 3)
 
Total
Amount
 
% to
Total
Quoted Prices in
Active Markets
for Identical
Assets (Level 1)
 
Significant
Observable
Inputs (Level 2)
 
Significant
Unobservable
Inputs (Level 3)
 
Total
Amount
 
% to
Total
Equity securities:        
Financial$49,391
 $ $ $49,391
 16
Consumer, Cyclical24,264
 
 
 24,264
 8
Technology19,871
 
 
 19,871
 6
Consumer, Non-Cyclical12,216
 
 
 12,216
 4
Industrial15,176
 
 
 15,176
 5
Other2,502
 8
 

 2,510
 1
Total equity securities123,420
 8
 
 123,428
 40
Corporate bonds:

 

 
 

 
        
Financial
 36,266
 
 36,266
 12$ $41,578
 $ $41,578
 13
Utilities
 43,229
 
 43,229
 14
 43,890
 
 43,890
 13
Energy
 25,890
 
 25,890
 8
 25,427
 
 25,427
 8
Other corporates
 40,996
 
 40,996
 13
 49,141
 
 49,141
 15
Total corporate bonds
 146,381
 
 146,381
 47
 160,036
 
 160,036
 49
Exchange traded fund(1)
134,771
     134,771
 41
Other bonds
 270
 
 270
 
 258
 
 258
 
Guaranteed annuity contract(1)

 17,082
 
 17,082
 6
Guaranteed annuity contract(2)

 18,997
 
 18,997
 6
Short-term investments15,593
 
 
 15,593
 57,391
 
 
 7,391
 2
Other4,842
 
 
 4,842
 27,418
 
 
 7,418
 2
Grand Total$143,855
 $163,741
 $
 $307,596
 100$149,580
 $179,291
 $
 $328,871
 100
(1)A fund including marketable securities that mirror the S&P 500 index.
(2)Representing a guaranteed annuity contract issued by Torchmark's subsidiary, American Income Life Insurance Company, to fund the obligations of the American Income Pension Plan.
 
Torchmark’s investment objectives for its plan assets include preservation of capital, preservation of purchasing power, and long-term growth. Torchmark seeks to preserve capital through investments made in high quality securities with adequate diversification by issuer and industry sector to minimize risk. The portfolio is monitored continuously for changes in quality and diversification mix. The preservation of purchasing power is intended to be accomplished through asset growth, exclusive of contributions and withdrawals, in excess of the rate of inflation. Torchmark intends to maintain investments that when combined with future plan contributions will produce adequate long-term growth to provide for all plan obligations. It is also Torchmark’s objective that the portfolio’s investment return will meet or exceed the return of a balanced market index.
 
The majority of the securities in the portfolio are highly marketable so that there will be adequate liquidity to meet projected payments. There are no specific policies calling for asset durations to match those of benefit obligations.

Index to Financial Statements

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)
(Dollar amounts in thousands except per share data)
Note 9—Postretirement Benefits (continued)



Allowed investments are limited to equities, fixed maturities, and short-term investments (invested cash). The assets are to be invested in a mix of equity and fixed income investments that best serve the objectives of the pension plan. Factors to be considered in determining the asset mix include funded status, annual pension expense, annual pension contributions, and balance sheet liability. Equities can include common and preferred stocks, securities convertible into equities, mutual funds and exchange traded funds that invest in equities, equity interests in limited partnerships, and other equity-related investments. EquitiesPrimarily, equities are listed on major exchanges and adequate market liquidity is required. Fixed maturities primarily consist of marketable debt securities rated investment grade at purchase by a major rating agency. Short-term investments include fixed maturities with maturities less than one year and invested cash. Short-term investments in commercial paper must be rated at least A-2 by Standard & Poor’s with the issuer rated investment grade. Invested cash is limited to banks rated A or higher. Investments outside of the aforementioned list are not permitted, except by prior approval of the Plan’s Trustees.

The investment portfolio is to be well diversified to avoid undue exposure to a single sector, industry, business, or security. The equity and fixed maturity portfolios are not permitted to invest in any single issuer that would exceed 10% of total plan assets at the time of purchase. Torchmark does not employ any other special risk management techniques, such as derivatives, in managing the pension investment portfolio.

As
89
TMK 2017 FORM 10-K

Table of December 31, 2016, Torchmark sold allContents


TORCHMARK CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)
(Dollar amounts in thousands, except per share data)
Note 9—Postretirement Benefits (continued)


Torchmark's equity securities in various sectors and replaced them withinclude an exchange traded fund that mirrors the S&P 500 index towhich better alignaligns with a passive approach rather than an actively managed portfolio. At December 31, 2016,2017, there were no restricted investments contained in the portfolio. Plan contributions have been invested primarily in fixed maturity and equity securities during the three years ended December 31, 2016.2017.

The following table discloses the assumptions used to determine Torchmark’s pension liabilities and costs for the appropriate periods. The discount and compensation increase rates are used to determine current year projected benefit obligations and subsequent year pension expense. The long-term rate of return is used to determine current year expense. Differences between assumptions and actual experience are included in actuarial gain or loss.

Weighted Average Pension Plan Assumptions
For Benefit Obligations at December 31:2016 2015 2017 2016 
Discount Rate4.27% 4.64% 3.75% 4.27% 
Rate of Compensation Increase4.31
 4.33
 4.37
 4.31
 
For Periodic Benefit Cost for the Year:2016 2015 20142017 2016 2015
Discount Rate4.64% 4.23% 5.12%4.27% 4.64% 4.23%
Expected Long-Term Returns7.19
 6.96
 6.97
6.96
 7.19
 6.96
Rate of Compensation Increase4.33
 4.35
 4.35
4.31
 4.33
 4.35

The discount rate is determined based on the expected duration of plan liabilities. A yield is then derived based on the current market yield of a hypothetical portfolio of higher-quality corporate bonds which match the liability duration. The rate of compensation increase is projected based on Company experience, modified as appropriate for future expectations. The expected long-term rate of return on plan assets is management’s best estimate of the average rate of earnings expected to be received on the assets invested in the plan over the benefit period. In determining this assumption, consideration is given to the historical rate of return earned on the assets, the projected returns over future periods, and the discount rate used to compute benefit obligations.
 
Net periodic pension cost for the defined benefit plans by expense component was as follows:
 Year Ended December 31,
 2017 2016 2015
Service cost—benefits earned during the period$17,942
 $15,502
 $15,902
Interest cost on projected benefit obligation22,124
 21,631
 19,887
Expected return on assets(23,597) (23,127) (21,204)
Net amortization12,281
 10,135
 14,465
Recognition of actuarial loss78
 61
 180
Net periodic pension cost$28,828
 $24,202
 $29,230

90
TMK 2017 FORM 10-K

Index to Financial StatementsTable of Contents


TORCHMARK CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)
(Dollar amounts in thousands, except per share data)
 
Note 9—Postretirement Benefits (continued)


Net periodic pension cost for the defined benefit plans by expense component was as follows:
 Year Ended December 31,
 2016 2015 2014
Service cost—benefits earned during the period$15,502
 $15,902
 $12,925
Interest cost on projected benefit obligation21,631
 19,887
 19,270
Expected return on assets(23,127) (21,204) (19,031)
Net amortization10,135
 14,465
 10,283
Recognition of actuarial loss61
 180
 16
Net periodic pension cost$24,202
 $29,230
 $23,463

An analysis of the impact on other comprehensive income (loss) concerning pensions and other postretirement benefits is as follows:
Year Ended December 31,Year Ended December 31,
2016 2015 20142017 2016 2015
Balance at January 1$(152,149) $(152,999) $(97,467)$(173,883) $(152,149) $(152,999)
Amortization of:          
Prior service cost477
 377
 2,113
476
 477
 377
Net actuarial (gain) loss(1)
9,691
 14,209
 8,172
11,960
 9,691
 14,209
Total amortization10,168
 14,586
 10,285
12,436
 10,168
 14,586
Plan amendments
 (2,104) 

 
 (2,104)
Experience gain (loss)(31,902) (11,632) (65,817)(31,933) (31,902) (11,632)
Balance at December 31$(173,883) $(152,149) $(152,999)$(193,380) $(173,883) $(152,149)
(1)Includes amortization of postretirement benefits other than pensions of $155 thousand in 2017, $33 thousand in 2016, and $120 thousand in 2015, and $2 thousand in 2014.2015. 




Index to Financial Statements

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)
(Dollar amounts in thousands except per share data)
Note 9—Postretirement Benefits (continued)


The following table presents a reconciliation from the beginning to the end of the year of the projected benefit obligation and plan assets for pensions. This table also presents the amounts previously recognized as a component of accumulated other comprehensive income.
Pension Benefits
Year Ended December 31,Year Ended December 31,
2016 20152017 2016
Changes in benefit obligation:      
Obligation at beginning of year$476,581
 $477,426
$527,522
 $476,581
Service cost15,502
 15,902
17,942
 15,502
Interest cost21,631
 19,887
22,124
 21,631
Plan amendments
 2,104

 
Actuarial loss (gain)34,667
 (19,226)55,369
 34,667
Benefits paid(20,859) (19,512)(20,351) (20,859)
Obligation at end of year527,522
 476,581
602,606
 527,522
      
Changes in plan assets:      
Fair value at beginning of year307,596
 322,898
328,871
 307,596
Return on assets26,377
 (11,333)47,832
 26,377
Contributions15,757
 15,543
21,272
 15,757
Benefits paid(20,859) (19,512)(20,351) (20,859)
Fair value at end of year328,871
 307,596
377,624
 328,871
Funded status at year end$(198,651) $(168,985)$(224,982) $(198,651)
Amounts recognized in accumulated other comprehensive income consist of:      
Net loss (gain)$167,313
 $145,623
$186,563
 $167,313
Prior service cost4,611
 5,088
4,135
 4,611
Net amounts recognized at year end$171,924
 $150,711
$190,698
 $171,924

The portion
91
TMK 2017 FORM 10-K

Table of other comprehensive income that is expected to be reflected in pension expense in 2017 is as follows:
Amortization of prior service cost$476
Amortization of net actuarial loss11,806
Total$12,282
Contents

The accumulated benefit obligation (ABO) for Torchmark’s funded defined benefit pension plans was $411 million and $371 million at December 31, 2016 and 2015, respectively. In the nonqualified plans, the ABO was $69 million at December 31, 2016 and $63 million at 2015.

Index to Financial Statements

TORCHMARK CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)
(Dollar amounts in thousands, except per share data)
 
Note 9—Postretirement Benefits (continued)


The portion of other comprehensive income that is expected to be reflected in pension expense in 2018 is as follows:
Amortization of prior service cost$476
Amortization of net actuarial loss14,543
Total$15,019

The accumulated benefit obligation (ABO) for Torchmark’s funded defined benefit pension plans was $466 million and $411 million at December 31, 2017 and 2016, respectively. In the nonqualified plans, the ABO was $75 million at December 31, 2017 and $69 million at 2016.
Torchmark has estimated its expected pension benefits to be paid over the next ten years as of December 31, 2016.2017. These estimates use the same assumptions that measure the benefit obligation at December 31, 2015,2016, taking estimated future employee service into account. Those estimated benefits are as follows:
For the year(s)  
2017$19,839
201821,198
$20,375
201922,516
22,143
202024,109
23,840
202125,678
25,239
2022-2025152,071
202227,090
2023-2027160,075
 
Postretirement Benefit Plans Other Than Pensions: Torchmark provides a small postretirement life insurance benefit for most retired employees, and also provides additional postretirement life insurance benefits for certain key employees. The majority of the life insurance benefits are accrued over the working lives of active employees. Otherwise, Torchmark does not provide postretirement benefits other than pensions and the life insurance benefits described above.
 
Torchmark’s postretirement defined benefit plans other than pensions are not funded. Liabilities for these plans are measured as of December 31 for the appropriate year.
 
The components of net periodic postretirement benefit cost for plans other than pensions are as follows:
Year Ended December 31,Year Ended December 31,
2016 2015 20142017 2016 2015
Service cost$
 $
 $
$
 $
 $
Interest cost on benefit obligation1,139
 1,075
 646
1,132
 1,139
 1,075
Expected return on plan assets
 
 

 
 
Net amortization33
 120
 2
155
 33
 120
Recognition of net actuarial (gain) loss(132) 367
 (256)167
 (132) 367
Net periodic postretirement benefit cost$1,040
 $1,562
 $392
$1,454
 $1,040
 $1,562
 


92
TMK 2017 FORM 10-K

Index to Financial StatementsTable of Contents


TORCHMARK CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)
(Dollar amounts in thousands, except per share data)
 
Note 9—Postretirement Benefits (continued)


The following table presents a reconciliation of the benefit obligation and plan assets from the beginning to the end of the year. As these plans are unfunded, funded status is equivalent to the accrued benefit liability.

Benefits Other Than Pensions
Year Ended December 31,Year Ended December 31,
2016 20152017 2016
Changes in benefit obligation:      
Obligation at beginning of year$22,479
 $22,895
$23,721
 $22,479
Service cost
 

 
Interest cost1,139
 1,075
1,132
 1,139
Actuarial loss (gain)412
 (1,133)1,045
 412
Benefits paid(309) (358)(285) (309)
Obligation at end of year23,721
 22,479
25,613
 23,721
      
Changes in plan assets:      
Fair value at beginning of year
 

 
Return on assets
 

 
Contributions309
 358
285
 309
Benefits paid(309) (358)(285) (309)
Fair value at end of year
 

 
Funded status at year end$(23,721) $(22,479)$(25,613) $(23,721)
Amounts recognized in accumulated other comprehensive income:      
Net loss(1)
$1,959
 $1,447
$2,682
 $1,959
Net amounts recognized at year end$1,959
 $1,447
$2,682
 $1,959
(1)The net loss for benefit plans other than pensions reduces other comprehensive income.

The table below presents the assumptions used to determine the liabilities and costs of Torchmark’s postretirement benefit plans other than pensions.

 Weighted Average Assumptions for Postretirement
Benefit Plans Other Than Pensions
For Benefit Obligations at December 31:2016 2015  2017 2016  
Discount Rate4.29% 4.66% 3.76% 4.29% 
For Periodic Benefit Cost for the Year:2016 2015 20142017 2016 2015
Discount Rate4.66% 4.23% 5.12%4.29% 4.66% 4.23%

93
TMK 2017 FORM 10-K

Index to Financial StatementsTable of Contents


TORCHMARK CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)
(Dollar amounts in thousands, except per share data)
 
Note 9—Postretirement Benefits (continued)


Estimated Future Payments for Post-Retirement Benefit Plans Other Than Pensions
For the year(s)  
2017$1,014
20181,133
$1,228
20191,247
1,278
20201,351
1,311
20211,462
1,344
2022-20259,811
20221,386
2023-20277,515

Note 10—Supplemental Disclosures of Cash Flow Information
 
The following table summarizes Torchmark’s noncash transactions, which are not reflected on the Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows:
Year Ended December 31,Year Ended December 31,
2016 2015 20142017 2016 2015
Stock-based compensation not involving cash$26,326
 $28,664
 $32,203
$37,034
 $26,326
 $28,664
Commitments for low-income housing interests56,818
 68,949
 75,706
33,846
 56,818
 68,949
Exchanges of fixed maturity investments224,901
 
 17,333
84,312
 224,901
 
Net unsettled security trades15,020
 
 

 15,020
 
 
The following table summarizes certain amounts paid during the period:
Year Ended December 31,Year Ended December 31,
2016 2015 20142017 2016 2015
Interest paid$81,338
 $74,792
 $77,066
$82,494
 $81,338
 $74,792
Income taxes paid79,790
 110,650
 100,922
74,379
 79,790
 110,650
 


94
TMK 2017 FORM 10-K

Index to Financial Statements
Table of Contents


TORCHMARK CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)
(Dollar amounts in thousands, except per share data)

Note 11—Debt
 
The following table presents information about the terms and outstanding balances of Torchmark’s debt.
 
Selected Information about Debt Issues
      As of December 31,      As of December 31,
      2016 2015      2017 2016
Annual
Interest
Rate
 
Issue
Date
 
Periodic
Interest
Payments
Due
 
Outstanding
Principal
(Par Value)
 
Outstanding
Principal
(Book Value)
 
Outstanding
Principal
(Fair Value)
 
Outstanding
Principal
(Book Value)
Annual
Interest
Rate
 
Issue
Date
 
Periodic
Interest
Payments
Due
 
Outstanding
Principal
(Par Value)
 
Outstanding
Principal
(Book Value)
 
Outstanding
Principal
(Fair Value)
 
Outstanding
Principal
(Book Value)
Long-term debt:                  
Notes, due 5/15/23(3,5)
7.875% 5/93 5/15 & 11/15 $165,612
 $164,095
 $196,496
 $163,920
7.875% 5/93 5/15 & 11/15 $165,612
 $164,284
 $195,786
 $164,095
Senior Notes, due 6/15/19(3,7)
9.250% 6/09 6/15 & 12/15 292,647
 291,424
 338,363
 291,002
9.250% 6/09 6/15 & 12/15 292,647
 291,888
 320,697
 291,424
Senior Notes, due 9/15/22(3,7)
3.800% 9/12 3/15 & 9/15 150,000
 148,189
 152,777
 147,913
3.800% 9/12 3/15 & 9/15 150,000
 148,477
 155,000
 148,189
Junior Subordinated Debentures due 12/15/52(4,8,11)
5.875% 9/12 quarterly 125,000
 120,929
 124,378
 120,898
Junior Subordinated Debentures due 3/15/36(4,6,11)
4.263%
(12) 
(10) 
 quarterly 20,000
 20,000
 20,000
 20,000
Junior Subordinated Debentures due 12/15/52(4,8,12)
5.875% 9/12 quarterly 
 
 
 120,929
Junior Subordinated Debentures due 3/15/36(4,6,12)
4.888%
(13) 
(11) 
 quarterly 20,000
 20,000
 20,000
 20,000
Junior Subordinated Debentures due 6/15/56(4,9)
6.125% 4/16 quarterly 300,000
 290,403
 302,880
 
6.125% 4/16 quarterly 300,000
 290,460
 321,120
 290,403
Junior Subordinated Debentures due 11/17/57(4,10)
5.275% 11/17 6/15 & 12/15 125,000
 123,342
 122,039
 
Term loan due 5/17/21(1,6)
1.856%
(13) 
6/16 monthly 100,000
 100,000
 100,000
 
2.600%
(14) 
6/16 monthly 98,125
 98,125
 98,125
 100,000
  1,153,259
 1,135,040
 1,234,894
 743,733
  1,151,384
 1,136,576
 1,232,767
 1,135,040
Less current maturity of term loanLess current maturity of term loan 1,875
 1,875
 1,875
 
Less current maturity of term loan 4,375
 4,375
 4,375
 1,875
Total long-term debtTotal long-term debt 1,151,384
 1,133,165
 1,233,019
 743,733
Total long-term debt 1,147,009
 1,132,201
 1,228,392
 1,133,165
                  
Short-term debt:                  
Senior Notes, due 6/15/166.375% 6/06 6/15 & 12/15 
 
 
 249,753
Current maturity of term loanCurrent maturity of term loan 1,875
 1,875
 1,875
 
Current maturity of term loan 4,375
 4,375
 4,375
 1,875
Commercial paper(2)
Commercial paper(2)
 262,850
 262,600
 262,600
 240,376
Commercial paper(2)
 324,250
 323,692
 323,692
 262,600
Total short-term debtTotal short-term debt 264,725
 264,475
 264,475
 490,129
Total short-term debt 328,625
 328,067
 328,067
 264,475
                  
Total debtTotal debt $1,416,109
 $1,397,640
 $1,497,494
 $1,233,862
Total debt $1,475,634
 $1,460,268
 $1,556,459
 $1,397,640

(1)The term loan has higher priority than all other debt issues.
(2)Commercial paper has priority over all other debt except the term loan.
(3)All securities, other than the term loan, commercial paper and Junior Subordinated Debentures have equal priority with one another.
(4)All Junior Subordinated Debentures have equal priority, but are subordinate to all other issues.
(5)Not callable.
(6)Callable anytime.
(7)Callable subject to “make-whole” premium.
(8)Callable as ofRedeemed on December 15,22, 2017.
(9)Callable subject to “make-whole” premium until June 15,at any time on or after June15, 2021, and at par on and any time after June 15, 2021.prior to this date upon the occurrence of a Tax Event or Rating Agency Event.
(10)Callable at any time on or after November 17, 2022, and prior to this date upon the occurrence of a Tax Event or Rating Agency Event.
(11)Assumed upon November 1, 2012 acquisition of Family Heritage.
(11)(12)Quarterly payments on the 15th of March, June, September, and December.
(12)(13)
Interest paid at 3 Month LIBOR plus 330 basis points, resets each quarter.
(13)(14)
Interest paid at 1 Month LIBOR plus 125 basis points, resets each month.




95
TMK 2017 FORM 10-K

Index to Financial StatementsTable of Contents

TORCHMARK CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)
(Dollar amounts in thousands except per share data)
 
Note 11—Debt (continued)

Contractual Debt Obligations: The following table presents expected scheduled principal payments under our contractual debt obligations:
 Year Ended December 31,
 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 Thereafter
Debt obligations$264,725
 $4,375
 $299,522
 $9,375
 $77,500
 $760,612
 Year Ended December 31,
 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 Thereafter
Debt obligations$328,625
 $299,522
 $9,375
 $77,500
 $150,000
 $610,612

Funded debt: On November 17, 2017, Torchmark completed the issuance and sale of $125 million in aggregate principal of Torchmark’s 5.275% Junior Subordinated Debentures due 2057. The debentures were sold in a private placement pursuant to exemptions from the registration requirements of the Securities Act of 1933. The initial purchaser of the debentures was outside the United States. The net proceeds from the sale of the debentures were $123.3 million, after giving effect to the discount payable to the initial purchaser and expenses of the offering of the debentures. Torchmark used the net proceeds from the offering of the debentures to repay the $125 million outstanding principal, plus accrued interest of $143 thousand on the 5.875% Junior Subordinated Debentures on December 22, 2017. The Debentures were due December 15, 2052 and were callable beginning December 15, 2017.

On April 5, 2016, Torchmark completed the issuance and sale of $300 million in aggregate principal of Torchmark’s 6.125% Junior Subordinated Debentures due 2056. The debentures were sold pursuant to Torchmark’s shelf registration statement on Form S-3, filed September 25, 2015. The net proceeds from the sale of the debentures were $290 million, after giving effect to the underwriting discount and expenses of the offering of the debentures. Torchmark used the net proceeds from the offering of the debentures to repay the $250 million outstanding principal, plus accrued interest of $8 million, on the 6.375% Senior Notes that were due June 15, 2016. The remaining proceeds were used for general corporate purposes.

Credit Facility: On May 17, 2016, Torchmark amended its credit facility to include, as a part of the facility, the issuance of a $100 million term loan and to extend the maturity date of the entire credit facility to May 2021. The facility is further designated as a back-up credit line for a commercial paper program under which the Company may either borrow from the credit line or issue commercial paper at any time, with total commercial paper outstanding not to exceed the facility maximum of $750 million, less any letters of credit issued. Interest is charged at variable rates. The term loan will be repaid on a redemption schedule which provides for quarterly installments beginningthat began June 30, 2017 that escalate each annual period with a balloon payment of $75 million due in May 2021. Interest on the term loan is computed and paid monthly at 125 basis points plus 1 Month LIBOR. In accordance with the agreement, Torchmark is subject to certain covenants regarding capitalization. As of December 31, 2016,2017, the Company was in full compliance with these covenants.

Commercial paper outstanding and any amortization payments of the term loan due within one year are reported as short-term debt on the Consolidated Balance Sheets. A table presenting selected information concerning Torchmark’s commercial paper borrowings is presented below.
 
Credit Facility - Commercial Paper
At December 31,At December 31,
2016 20152017 2016
Balance at end of period (at par value)$262,850
 $240,544
$324,250
 $262,850
Annualized interest rate0.96% 0.55%1.78% 0.96%
Letters of credit outstanding$177,000
 $177,000
$177,000
 $177,000
Remaining amount available under credit line310,150
 332,456
248,750
 310,150


 Year Ended December 31,
 2016 2015 2014
Average balance outstanding during period$301,550
 $350,851
 $296,246
Daily-weighted average interest rate (annualized)0.83% 0.43% 0.26%
Maximum daily amount outstanding during period$412,676
 $458,110
 $343,000
96
TMK 2017 FORM 10-K

Table of Contents

Index to Financial Statements

TORCHMARK CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)
(Dollar amounts in thousands except per share data)
Note 11—Debt (continued)

 Year Ended December 31,
 2017 2016 2015
Average balance outstanding during period$323,429
 $301,550
 $350,851
Daily-weighted average interest rate (annualized)1.30% 0.83% 0.43%
Maximum daily amount outstanding during period$455,912
 $412,676
 $458,110

Note 12—Shareholders’ Equity
 
Share Data: A summary of preferred and common share activity is presented in the following chart.
Preferred Stock Common StockPreferred Stock Common Stock
Issued 
Treasury
Stock
 Issued 
Treasury
Stock
Issued 
Treasury
Stock
 Issued 
Treasury
Stock
2014:       
Balance at January 1, 2014
 
 151,218,183
 (16,965,802)
Grants of restricted stock
 
 
 19,041
Forfeitures of restricted stock
 
 
 (2,700)
Issuance of common stock due to exercise of stock options
 
 
 2,210,349
Treasury stock acquired
 
 
 (8,548,795)
Retirement of treasury stock
 
 (17,000,000) 17,000,000
Balance at December 31, 2014
 
 134,218,183
 (6,287,907)
2015:              
Balance at January 1, 2015
 
 134,218,183
 (6,287,907)
Grants of restricted stock
 
 
 6,648

 
 
 6,648
Forfeitures of restricted stock
 
 
 (13,950)
 
 
 (13,950)
Vesting of performance shares
 
 
 211,287

 
 
 211,287
Issuance of common stock due to exercise of stock options
 
 
 1,576,485

 
 
 1,576,485
Treasury stock acquired
 
 
 (7,340,794)
 
 
 (7,340,794)
Retirement of treasury stock
 
 (4,000,000) 4,000,000

 
 (4,000,000) 4,000,000
Balance at December 31, 2015
 
 130,218,183
 (7,848,231)
 
 130,218,183
 (7,848,231)
2016:              
Grants of restricted stock
 
 
 12,549

 
 
 12,549
Forfeitures of restricted stock
 
 
 
Vesting of performance shares
 
 
 159,020

 
 
 159,020
Issuance of common stock due to exercise of stock options
 
 
 2,184,169

 
 
 2,184,169
Treasury stock acquired
 
 
 (6,694,582)
 
 
 (6,694,582)
Retirement of treasury stock
 
 (3,000,000) 3,000,000

 
 (3,000,000) 3,000,000
Balance at December 31, 2016
 
 127,218,183
 (9,187,075)
 
 127,218,183
 (9,187,075)
2017:       
Grants of restricted stock
 
 
 9,135
Vesting of performance shares
 
 
 119,896
Issuance of common stock due to exercise of stock options
 
 
 1,661,808
Treasury stock acquired
 
 
 (5,228,868)
Retirement of treasury stock
 
 (3,000,000) 3,000,000
Balance at December 31, 2017
 
 124,218,183
 (9,625,104)
 
Acquisition of Common Shares: Torchmark shares are acquired from time to time through open market purchases under the Torchmark stock repurchase program when it is believed to be the best use of Torchmark’s excess cash flows. Share repurchases under this program were 4.1 million shares at a cost of $325 million in 2017, 5.2 million shares at a cost of $311 million in 2016, and 6.3 million shares at a cost of $359 million in 2015, and 7.2 million shares at a cost of $375 million in 2014.2015. When stock options are exercised, proceeds from the exercises are generally used to repurchase approximately the number of shares available with those funds in order to reduce dilution. Shares repurchased for dilution purposes were 1.1 million shares at a cost of $88 million in 2017, 1.5 million shares at a cost of $93 million in 2016, and 1.0 million shares at a cost of $60 million in 2015, and 1.4 million shares at a cost2015.

97
TMK 2017 FORM 10-K

Table of $74 millionContents


TORCHMARK CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)
(Dollar amounts in 2014.thousands except per share data)
 
Note 12—Shareholders’ Equity (continued)

Retirement of Treasury Stock: Torchmark retired 3.0 million shares of treasury stock in 2017, 3.0 million in 2016, and 4.0 million in 2015, and 17.0 million in 2014.2015.
 
Restrictions: Restrictions exist on the flow of funds to Torchmark from its insurance subsidiaries. Statutory regulations require life insurance subsidiaries to maintain certain minimum amounts of capital and surplus. Dividends from insurance subsidiaries of Torchmark are restricted based on regulations by their statestates of domicile. Additionally, insurance company distributions are generally not permitted in excess of statutory surplus. Subsidiaries are also subject to certain minimum

Index to Financial Statements

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)
(Dollar amounts in thousands except per share data)
Note 12—Shareholders’ Equity (continued)

capital requirements. Subsidiaries of Torchmark paid cash dividends to the Parent Company in the amount of $454 million in 2017, $438 million in 2016, and $466 million in 2015, and $479 million in 2014.2015. As of December 31, 2016,2017, dividends and transfers from insurance subsidiaries to parent available to be paid in 20172018 are limited to the amount of $262$315 million without regulatory approval, such that $1.1 billion$940 million was considered restricted net assets of the subsidiaries. Dividends exceeding these limitations may be available during the year pending regulatory approval. While there are no legal restrictions on the payment of dividends to shareholders from Torchmark’s retained earnings, retained earnings as of December 31, 20162017 were restricted by lenders’ covenants which require the Company to maintain and not distribute $2.6$3.5 billion from its total consolidated retained earnings of $3.9$4.8 billion.
 
Earnings Per Share: A reconciliation of basic and diluted weighted-average shares outstanding used in the computation of basic and diluted earnings per share is as follows:
Year Ended December 31,Year Ended December 31,
2016 2015 20142017 2016 2015
Basic weighted average shares outstanding120,001,191
 125,094,628
 130,721,738
116,342,529
 120,001,191
 125,094,628
Weighted average dilutive options outstanding2,366,594
 1,662,607
 1,918,506
2,640,965
 2,366,594
 1,662,607
Diluted weighted average shares outstanding122,367,785
 126,757,235
 132,640,244
118,983,494
 122,367,785
 126,757,235
 
ThereFor the three years ended December 31, 2017, there were no anti-dilutive shares as of December 31, 2016, 2015, or 2014.shares. Income available to common shareholders for basic earnings per share is equivalent to income available to common shareholders for diluted earnings per share. As discussed earlier in Note 1—Significant Accounting Policies, the Company adopted ASU 2016-09 on January 1, 2016.

Note 13—Stock-Based Compensation
 
Torchmark’s stock-based compensation consists of stock options, restricted stock, restricted stock units, and performance shares. Certain employees and directors have been granted fixed equity options to buy shares of Torchmark stock at the market value of the stock on the date of grant, under the provisions of the Torchmark stock option plans. The options are exercisable during the period commencing from the date they vest until expiring according to the terms of the grant. Options generally expire the earlier of employee termination or option contract term, which ranges fromare either seven toor ten years.year terms. Options generally vest in accordance with the following schedule:

 
 Shares vested by period
 Contract Period 6 Months Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year 5
Directors7 years 100%          
Employees7 years —% —% 50% 50%    
Employees(1)
10 years —% —% 25% 25% 25% 25%

(1)Grant offered through the Torchmark Corporation 2011 Incentive Plan only.

All employee options vest immediately upon retirement on or after the attainment of age 65, upon death, or disability. Torchmark generally issues shares for the exercise of stock options from treasury stock. The Company generally uses

98
TMK 2017 FORM 10-K

Table of Contents


TORCHMARK CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)
(Dollar amounts in thousands except per share data)
Note 13—Stock-Based Compensation (continued)

the proceeds from option exercises to buy shares of Torchmark common stock in the open market to reduce the dilution from option exercises.
 
During 2014, shareholders approved an amendment to the 2011 Incentive Plan allowing for an additional 6.3 million shares available for grant.

Index to Financial Statements

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)
(Dollar amounts in thousands except per share data)
Note 13—Stock-Based Compensation (continued)

An analysis of shares available for grant is as follows:
Available for GrantAvailable for Grant
2016 2015 20142017 2016 2015
Balance at January 1,6,872,282
 8,458,593
 4,368,753
5,088,461
 6,872,282
 8,458,593
2011 Plan amendment
 
 6,300,000
Options expired and forfeited during year(1)
8,518
 90,371
 3,488
26,488
 8,518
 90,371
Restricted stock expired and forfeited during year(2)

 89,745
 31,620
46,500
 
 89,745
Options granted during year(1)
(1,306,306) (1,334,514) (1,523,982)(1,328,513) (1,306,306) (1,334,514)
Restricted stock, restricted stock units, and performance shares granted under the Torchmark Corporation 2011 Incentive Plan(2)
(486,033) (431,913) (721,286)(868,616) (486,033) (431,913)
Balance at December 31,5,088,461
 6,872,282
 8,458,593
2,964,320
 5,088,461
 6,872,282
(1)Plan allows for grant of options such that each grant reduces shares available for grant in a range from 0.85 share to 1 share.
(2)Plan allows for grant of restricted stock such that each stock grant reduces shares available for grant in a range from 3.1 shares to 3.88 shares.


A summary of stock compensation activity for each of the three years ended December 31, 20162017 is presented below:
2016 2015 20142017 2016 2015
Stock-based compensation expense recognized(1)
$26,326
 $28,664
 $32,203
$37,034
 $26,326
 $28,664
Tax benefit recognized(2)
27,867
 10,033
 11,271
32,511
 27,867
 10,033
(1)No stock-based compensation expense was capitalized in any period.
(2)
Due to the adoption of ASU 2016-09 as described in Note 1—Significant Accounting Policiesunder "Accounting Pronouncements Adopted in the Current Year", certain current year balances related to excess tax benefits from stock compensation were adjusted prospectively.


Additional stock compensation information is as follows at December 31:
2016 20152017 2016
Unrecognized compensation(1)
$27,334
 $33,977
$31,309
 $27,334
Weighted average period of expected recognition (in years)(1)
0.89
 0.85
0.86
 0.89
(1)Includes restricted stock and performance shares.

No equity awards were cash settled during the three years ended December 31, 2016.2017.

Options: The following table summarizes information about stock options outstanding at December 31, 2017.
  Options Outstanding Options Exercisable
Range of
Exercise Prices
 
Number
Outstanding
 
Weighted-
Average
Remaining
Contractual
Life (Years)
 
Weighted-
Average
Exercise
Price
 
Number
Exercisable
 
Weighted-
Average
Exercise
Price
$29.59 - $37.40 1,421,268
 2.20 $34.54
 1,366,689
 $34.42
50.64 1,405,725
 6.39 50.64
 
 
50.69 - 51.62 1,090,703
 3.69 50.70
 958,463
 50.70
53.61 - 56.32 1,384,582
 4.63 53.65
 594,184
 53.71
73.92 - 77.26 1,451,523
 7.23 77.24
 9,643
 73.92
$29.59 - $77.26 6,753,801
 4.89 $53.59
 2,928,979
 $43.79

99
TMK 2017 FORM 10-K

Table of Contents


Index to Financial Statements

TORCHMARK CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)
(Dollar amounts in thousands except per share data)
 
Note 13—Stock-Based Compensation (continued)

Options:

The following table summarizes information about stock options outstanding at December 31, 2016.

  Options Outstanding Options Exercisable
Range of
Exercise Prices
 
Number
Outstanding
 
Weighted-
Average
Remaining
Contractual
Life (Years)
 
Weighted-
Average
Exercise
Price
 
Number
Exercisable
 
Weighted-
Average
Exercise
Price
$20.58 - $32.48 1,549,010
 2.23 $30.01
 1,470,267
 $29.99
37.40 - 43.06 1,111,634
 3.53 37.67
 998,713
 37.70
50.64 1,412,225
 7.41 50.64
 
 
50.69 1,406,282
 4.63 50.69
 604,802
 50.69
51.62 - 56.32 1,494,440
 5.65 53.64
 42,065
 54.79
$20.58 - $56.32 6,973,591
 4.70 $44.64
 3,115,847
 $36.81

An analysis of option activity for each of the three years ended December 31, 20162017 is as follows:
2016 2015 20142017 2016 2015
Options 
Weighted Average
Exercise Price
 Options 
Weighted Average
Exercise Price
 Options 
Weighted Average
Exercise Price
Options 
Weighted Average
Exercise Price
 Options 
Weighted Average
Exercise Price
 Options 
Weighted Average
Exercise Price
Outstanding-beginning of year7,734,841
 $38.84
 7,889,321
 $32.91
 8,579,202
 $27.84
Outstanding—beginning of year6,973,591
 $44.64
 7,734,841
 $38.84
 7,889,321
 $32.91
Granted:                      
7-year term834,212
 50.78
 1,220,751
 53.62
 1,226,270
 50.70
933,286
 77.19
 834,212
 50.78
 1,220,751
 53.62
10-year term597,225
 50.64
 296,875
 53.61
 297,712
 50.69
535,220
 77.26
 597,225
 50.64
 296,875
 53.61
Exercised(2,184,169) 28.08
 (1,576,485) 22.81
 (2,210,348) 25.47
(1,661,808) 36.84
 (2,184,169) 28.08
 (1,576,485) 22.81
Expired and forfeited(8,518) 39.35
 (95,621) 48.85
 (3,488) 40.05
(26,488) 57.94
 (8,518) 39.35
 (95,621) 48.85
Adjustment due to 7/1/14 stock split
 
 
 
 (27) 
Outstanding-end of year6,973,591
 $44.64
 7,734,841
 $38.84
 7,889,321
 $32.91
Outstanding—end of year6,753,801
 $53.59
 6,973,591
 $44.64
 7,734,841
 $38.84
                      
Exercisable at end of year3,115,847
 $36.81
 3,774,061
 $29.37
 3,809,415
 $24.58
2,928,979
 $43.79
 3,115,847
 $36.81
 3,774,061
 $29.37

Additional information about Torchmark’s stock option activity as of December 31, 20162017 and 20152016 is as follows:
2016 20152017 2016
Outstanding options:      
Weighted-average remaining contractual term (in years)4.70

4.32
4.89
 4.70
Aggregate intrinsic value$87,286

$141,728
$231,277
 $87,286
Exercisable options:



 
Weighted-average remaining contractual term (in years)2.96

2.74
2.99
 2.96
Aggregate intrinsic value$63,395

$104,885
$137,424
 $63,395
 
Selected stock option activity for the three years ended December 31, 20162017 is presented below:

Index to Financial Statements

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)
(Dollar amounts in thousands except per share data)
Note 13—Stock-Based Compensation (continued)

2016 2015 20142017 2016 2015
Weighted-average grant-date fair value of options granted
(per share)
$9.04
 $11.97
 $14.77
$12.88
 $9.04
 $11.97
Intrinsic value of options exercised73,995
 54,854
 61,229
70,948
 73,995
 54,854
Cash received from options exercised61,329
 35,958
 56,294
61,215
 61,329
 35,958
Actual tax benefit received25,898
 24,470
 23,232
24,832
 25,898
 24,470

Additional information concerning Torchmark’s unvested options is as follows at December 31:
2016 2015 2017 2016 
Number of shares outstanding3,857,744
 3,960,780
 3,824,822
 3,857,744
 
Weighted-average exercise price (per share)$50.97
 $47.86
 $61.10
 $50.97
 
Weighted-average remaining contractual term (in years)6.11
 5.82
 6.34
 6.11
 
Aggregate intrinsic value$23,891
 $36,843
 $113,246
 $23,891
 
 
Torchmark expects that substantially all unvested options will vest.


Restricted Stock:

Restricted stock grants consist of time-vested grants, restricted stock units, and performance shares. Time-vested restricted stock is available to both senior executives and directors. The employee grants generally vest over five years and the director grants vest over six months. Restricted stock units are available only to directors. They vest over six months and are not converted to shares until the directors’ retirement, death, or disability. Director restricted

TORCHMARK CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)
(Dollar amounts in thousands except per share data)
Note 13—Stock-Based Compensation (continued)

stock and restricted stock units are generally granted on the first work day of the year. Performance shares are granted to a limited number of senior executives. Performance shares have a three year contract life and are not settled in shares until the termination of the three-year contract period. While the grant specifies a stated target number of shares, the determination of the actual settlement in shares will be based on the achievement of certain performance objectives of Torchmark over the respective three-year contract periods. Certain executive restricted stock and performance share grants contain terms related to age that could accelerate vesting.

Restricted stock units outstanding at each of the year ends 2017, 2016, and 2015 were 120,326, 112,591, and 2014 were 112,591, 105,679, and 98,039, respectively. All restricted stock units were fully vested at the end of each year of grant.
Below is the final determination of the performance share grants in 20122013 to 2014:2015:
Year of grants Final settlement of shares Final settlement date Final settlement of shares Final settlement date
2012 211,287
 January 27, 2015
2013 159,020
 February 24, 2016 159,020
 February 24, 2016
2014 119,896
 February 21, 2017 119,896
 February 21, 2017
2015 149,898
 February 27, 2018
For the 20152016 and 20162017 performance share grants, actual shares that could be distributed range from 0 to 353335 thousand for the 20152016 grants and 0 to 335306 thousand shares for the 20162017 grants.


Index to Financial Statements

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)
(Dollar amounts in thousands except per share data)
Note 13—Stock-Based Compensation (continued)

A summary of restricted stock grants for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 20162017 is presented in the table below.
2016 2015 20142017 2016 2015
Executives restricted stock:     
Shares
 
 12,000
Price per share$
 $
 $50.69
Aggregate value$
 $
 $608
Percent vested as of 12/31/16% % %
Directors restricted stock:          
Shares12,549
 6,648
 7,041
9,135
 12,549
 6,648
Price per share$57.39
 $54.16
 $51.62
$73.92
 $57.39
 $54.16
Aggregate value$720
 $360
 $363
$675
 $720
 $360
Percent vested as of 12/31/1685% 100% 100%
Percent vested as of 12/31/17100% 85% 100%
Directors restricted stock units (including dividend equivalents):          
Shares6,912
 7,640
 12,322
7,735
 6,912
 7,640
Price per share$56.74
 $54.44
 $51.69
$74.45
 $56.74
 $54.44
Aggregate value$392
 $416
 $637
$576
 $392
 $416
Percent vested as of 12/31/16100% 100% 100%
Percent vested as of 12/31/17100% 100% 100%
Performance shares:

 

 

     
Target shares167,500
 179,500
 179,250
153,000
 167,500
 179,500
Target price per share$50.64
 $53.61
 $51.41
$77.26
 $50.64
 $53.61
Assumed adjustment for performance objectives (in shares)(35,073) (58,056) 22,060
106,084
 (35,073) (58,056)
Aggregate value$8,482
 $9,623
 $9,215
$11,821
 $8,482
 $9,623
Percent vested as of 12/31/16% % %
Percent vested as of 12/31/17% % %
Time-vested restricted stock holders, both employees and directors, are entitled to dividend payments on the unvested stock. Restricted stock unit holders are entitled to dividend equivalents. These equivalents are granted in the form of additional restricted stock units and vest immediately upon grant. Dividend equivalents are applicable only to restricted stock units. Performance shareholders are not entitled to dividend equivalents and are not entitled to dividend payments until the shares are vested and settled.

Index to Financial Statements

TORCHMARK CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)
(Dollar amounts in thousands except per share data)
 
Note 13—Stock-Based Compensation (continued)

An analysis of unvested restricted stock is as follows:
Executive
Restricted
Stock

Executive
Performance
Shares

Directors
Restricted
Stock

Directors
Restricted
Stock
Units

TotalExecutive
Restricted
Stock
 Executive
Performance
Shares
 Directors
Restricted
Stock
 Directors
Restricted
Stock
Units
 Total
2014:         
Balance at January 1, 2014344,445
 362,550
 
 
 706,995
Grants12,000
 179,250
 7,041
 12,322
 210,613
Additional performance shares(1)


 22,060
 

 

 22,060
Restriction lapses and settlements(90,315) 

 (7,041) (12,322) (109,678)
Forfeitures(2,700) (7,500) 

 

 (10,200)
Balance at December 31, 2014263,430
 556,360
 
 
 819,790
2015:                  
Balance at January 1, 2015263,430
 556,360
 
 
 819,790
Grants
 179,500
 6,648
 7,640
 193,788

 179,500
 6,648
 7,640
 193,788
Additional performance shares(1)


 (58,056) 

 

 (58,056)

 (58,056) 

 

 (58,056)
Restriction lapses(61,815) (211,287) (6,648) (7,640) (287,390)(61,815) (211,287) (6,648) (7,640) (287,390)
Forfeitures(13,950) (7,500) 

 

 (21,450)(13,950) (7,500) 

 

 (21,450)
Balance at December 31, 2015187,665
 459,017
 
 
 646,682
187,665
 459,017
 
 
 646,682
2016:                  
Grants
 167,500
 12,549
 6,912
 186,961

 167,500
 12,549
 6,912
 186,961
Additional performance shares(1)


 (35,073) 

 

 (35,073)

 (35,073) 

 

 (35,073)
Restriction lapses(130,215) (159,020) (10,655) (6,912) (306,802)(130,215) (159,020) (10,655) (6,912) (306,802)
Forfeitures
 
 

 

 

 
 

 

 
Balance at December 31, 201657,450
 432,424
 1,894
 
 491,768
57,450
 432,424
 1,894
 
 491,768
2017:         
Grants
 153,000
 9,135
 7,735
 169,870
Additional performance shares(1)


 106,084
 

 

 106,084
Restriction lapses(14,700) (119,896) (11,029) (7,735) (153,360)
Forfeitures(7,500) (7,500) 

 

 (15,000)
Balance at December 31, 201735,250
 564,112
 
 
 599,362

(1)Estimated additional (reduced) share grants expected due to achievement of performance criteria.


An analysis of the weighted-average grant-date fair values per share of unvested restricted stock is as follows for the year 2016:2017:
Executive
Restricted Stock
 
Executive
Performance
Shares
 
Directors
Restricted
Stock
 
Directors
Restricted
Stock Units
Executive Restricted Stock Executive Performance Shares Directors Restricted Stock Directors Restricted Stock Units
Grant-date fair value per share at January 1, 2016$32.92
 $46.77
    
Grant-date fair value per share at January 1, 2017$38.46
 $49.79
 $63.39
 
Grants
 50.64
 $57.39
 $56.32

 77.26
 73.92
 $73.92
Estimated additional performance shares  (70.47)      71.76
 
 
Restriction lapses(30.47) (37.40) (56.32) (56.32)(30.69) (72.42) (72.11) (73.92)
Forfeitures
 
    (37.40) (43.85) 
 
Grant-date fair value per share at December 31, 201638.46
 49.79
 63.39
  
Grant-date fair value per share at December 31, 201741.93
 56.64
 
 


Index to Financial Statements

TORCHMARK CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)
(Dollar amounts in thousands, except per share data)

Note 14—Business Segments
 
Torchmark is organized into four segments: life insurance, supplemental health insurance, annuities, and investments. We also have other administrative expenses reported in "Corporate & Other."

Torchmark’s reportable segments are based on the insurance product lines it markets and administers: life insurance, supplemental health insurance, and annuities. These major product lines are set out as reportable segments because of the common characteristics of products within these categories, comparability of margins, and the similarity in regulatory environment and management techniques. There is also an investment segment which manages the investment portfolio, debt, and cash flow for the insurance segments and the corporate function. Torchmark's chief operating decision makers evaluate the overall performance of the operations of the Company in accordance with these segments.
 
Life insurance products include traditional and interest-sensitive whole life insurance as well as term life insurance. Health insurance products are generally guaranteed-renewable and include Medicare Supplement, critical illness, accident, and limited-benefit supplemental hospital and surgical coverages. Annuities include fixed-benefit contracts.
 
Torchmark markets its insurance products through a number of distribution channels, each of which sells the products of one or more of Torchmark’s insurance segments. The tables below present segment premium revenue by each of Torchmark’s marketing groups.distribution channels.
 
Torchmark Corporation
Premium Income by Distribution Channel
 
 For the Year 2017
 Life Health Annuity Total
Distribution ChannelAmount 
% of
Total
 Amount 
% of
Total
 Amount 
% of
Total
 Amount 
% of
Total
United American Independent$12,547
 1 $364,128
 37 $15
 100 $376,690
 12
Liberty National Exclusive274,635
 12 196,207
 20     470,842
 14
American Income Exclusive999,279
 43 89,036
 9     1,088,315
 33
Family Heritage Exclusive3,193
  253,534
 26     256,727
 8
Direct Response812,907
 35 73,468
 8     886,375
 27
Other203,986
 9         203,986
 6
 $2,306,547
 100 $976,373
 100 $15
 100 $3,282,935
 100
 For the Year 2016
 Life Health Annuity Total
Distribution ChannelAmount 
% of
Total
 Amount 
% of
Total
 Amount 
% of
Total
 Amount 
% of
Total
United American Independent$13,733
 1 $355,015
 38 $38
 100 $368,786
 12
Liberty National Exclusive270,476
 12 201,798
 21     472,274
 15
American Income Exclusive913,355
 42 84,382
 9     997,737
 32
Family Heritage Exclusive2,866
  236,075
 25     238,941
 8
Direct Response782,765
 36 70,393
 7     853,158
 27
Other206,138
 9         206,138
 6
 $2,189,333
 100 $947,663
 100 $38
 100 $3,137,034
 100
 For the Year 2015
 Life Health Annuity Total
Distribution ChannelAmount 
% of
Total
 Amount 
% of
Total
 Amount 
% of
Total
 Amount 
% of
Total
United American Independent$15,036
 1 $345,330
 37 $135
 100 $360,501
 12
Liberty National Exclusive271,113
 13 209,150
 23     480,263
 16
American Income Exclusive830,903
 40 80,339
 9     911,242
 30
Family Heritage Exclusive2,334
  221,091
 24     223,425
 8
Direct Response746,693
 36 69,610
 7     816,303
 27
Other206,986
 10         206,986
 7
 $2,073,065
 100 $925,520
 100 $135
 100 $2,998,720
 100


Index to Financial Statements

TORCHMARK CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)
(Dollar amounts in thousands except per share data)
 
Note 14—Business Segments (continued)

For the Year 2014For the Year 2015
Life Health Annuity TotalLife Health Annuity Total
Distribution ChannelAmount 
% of
Total
 Amount 
% of
Total
 Amount 
% of
Total
 Amount 
% of
Total
Amount 
% of
Total
 Amount 
% of
Total
 Amount 
% of
Total
 Amount 
% of
Total
United American Independent$16,582
 1 $305,368
 35 $400
 100 $322,350
 11$15,036
 1 $345,330
 37 $135
 100 $360,501
 12
Liberty National Exclusive272,265
 14 222,017
 25   494,282
 18271,113
 13 209,150
 23   480,263
 16
American Income Exclusive766,458
 39 78,722
 9   845,180
 30830,903
 40 80,339
 9   911,242
 30
Family Heritage Exclusive1,595
  204,667
 24   206,262
 72,334
  221,091
 24   223,425
 8
Direct Response702,023
 36 58,666
 7   760,689
 27746,693
 36 69,610
 7   816,303
 27
Other207,377
 10         207,377
 7206,986
 10         206,986
 7
$1,966,300
 100 $869,440
 100 $400
 100 $2,836,140
 100$2,073,065
 100 $925,520
 100 $135
 100 $2,998,720
 100

Due to the nature of the life insurance industry, Torchmark has no individual or group which would be considered a major customer. Substantially all of Torchmark’s business is conducted in the United States.
 
The measure of profitability established by the chief operating decision makers for insurance segments is underwriting margin before other income and administrative expenses, in accordance with the manner the segments are managed. It essentially represents gross profit margin on insurance products before insurance administrative expenses and consists of premium, less net policy obligations, acquisition expenses, and commissions. Interest credited to net policy liabilities (reserves less deferred acquisition costs) is reflected as a component of the Investment segment in order to match this cost to the investment earnings from the assets supporting the net policy liabilities.
 
The measure of profitability for the Investment segment is excess investment income, which represents the income earned on the investment portfolio in excess of net policy requirements and financing costs associated with Torchmark’s debt. Other than the above-mentioned interest allocations and an intersegment commission, there are no other intersegment revenues or expenses. Expenses directly attributable to corporate operations are included in the “Corporate”“Corporate & Other” category. Stock-based compensation expense is considered a corporate expense by Torchmark management and is included in this category. All other unallocated revenues and expenses on a pretax basis, including insurance administrative expense, are also included in the “Other”“Corporate & Other” segment category.
 
Torchmark holds a sizeablesizable investment portfolio to support its insurance liabilities, the yield from which is used to offset policy benefit, acquisition, administrative and tax expenses. This yield or investment income is taken into account when establishing premium rates and profitability expectations of its insurance products. In holding such a portfolio, investments are sold, called, or written down from time to time, resulting in a realized gain or loss. These gains or losses generally occur as a result of disposition due to issuer calls, compliance with Company investment policies, or other reasons often beyond management’s control. Unlike investment income, realized gains and losses are incidental to insurance operations, and only overall yields are considered when setting premium rates or insurance product profitability expectations. While these gains and losses are not relevant to segment profitability or core operating results, they can have a material positive or negative result on net income. For these reasons, management removes realized investment gains and losses when it views its segment operations.

In 2016, Torchmark recorded $3.8 million in administrative settlements ($2.5 million after tax) related to benefits paid for deaths occurring in prior years where claims had not been filed. These administrative settlements were included in “Policyholder benefits” in the Consolidated Statements of Operations in 2016.
In 2015, Torchmark recorded $1.4 million in administrative settlements ($906 thousand after tax) related to a post closing adjustment on the sale of a former subsidiary. These administrative settlements were included in "Commissions, premium taxes, and non-deferred acquisition costs" in the Consolidated Statements of Operations in 2015.

During 2014, Torchmark accrued for certain litigation matters in the net amount of $3.7 million ($2.4 million after tax) that were not directly related to its insurance operations. Additionally, Torchmark received $1.3 million ($853 thousand after tax) in settlement of litigation regarding investments. Also in 2014, the Company recorded $8.2 million in

Index to Financial Statements

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)
(Dollar amounts in thousands except per share data)
Note 14—Business Segments (continued)

administrative settlements ($5.3 million after tax) related to benefits paid for deaths occurring in prior years where claims had not been filed. These administrative settlements were included in “Policyholder benefits” in the Consolidated Statements of Operations in 2014.

Management removes items that are related to prior periods when evaluating the operating results of current periods. Management also removes non-operating items unrelated to its core insurance activities when evaluating those results. Therefore, these items are excluded in its presentation of segment results, because accounting guidance requires that operating segment results be presented as management views its business. With the exception of the administrative settlements noted in the paragraphs above, all of these items are included in “Other operating expense” in the Consolidated Statements of Operations for the appropriate year.

In 2017, Torchmark recorded $8.7 million in administrative settlements ($5.6 million after tax) where claims were not properly filed or information to support the validity of the claim had not been properly submitted. These administrative settlements were included in "Policyholder benefits" in the Consolidated Statements of Operations in 2017.


TORCHMARK CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)
(Dollar amounts in thousands except per share data)
Note 14—Business Segments (continued)

As further discussed in Note 15—Commitments and Contingencies, the Company received an assessment from various state guaranty fund associations for the liquidation of Penn Treaty and its affiliate. The total estimated assessment for Torchmark's subsidiaries is approximately $9.6 million of which $1.8 million is estimated to be unrecoverable. We are anticipating the remaining amount of the assessments to be recovered through premium tax credits. The assessment expenses were considered a non-operational event and therefore were excluded from the core underwriting operations of the Company.

As a result of the Tax Legislation, which is discussed in Note 1—Significant Accounting Policies, we recorded a one-time increase in stock-based compensation expense of 3.4 million ($2.2 million after tax) due to the impact the Tax Legislation had on certain performance based equity awards.

In 2016, Torchmark recorded $3.8 million in administrative settlements ($2.5 million after tax) related to benefits paid for deaths occurring in prior years where claims had not been filed. These administrative settlements were included in "Policyholder benefits" in the Consolidated Statements of Operations in 2016.

In 2015, Torchmark recorded $1.4 million in administrative settlements ($906 thousand after tax) related to a post- closing adjustment on the sale of a former subsidiary. These administrative settlements were included in "Commissions, premium taxes, and non-deferred acquisition costs" in the Consolidated Statements of Operations in 2015.


TORCHMARK CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)
(Dollar amounts in thousands except per share data)
Note 14—Business Segments (continued)

The following tables set forth a reconciliation of Torchmark’s revenues and operations by segment to its major income statement line items. See Note 1—Significant Accounting Policies for additional information concerning reconciling items of segment profits to pretax income.
For the year 2016For the year 2017
Life Health Annuity Investment Other Corporate Adjustments ConsolidatedLife Health Annuity Investment Corporate & Other AdjustmentsConsolidated
Revenue:                             
Premium$2,189,333
 $947,663
 $38
         $3,137,034
$2,306,547
 $976,373
 $15
       $3,282,935
Net investment income      $806,903
       806,903
      $847,885
     847,885
Other income        $1,534
   $(159)
(2) 
 1,375
        $1,270
 $(128)
(2) 
1,142
Total revenue2,189,333
 947,663
 38
 806,903
 1,534
   (159) 3,945,312
2,306,547
 976,373
 15
 847,885
 1,270
 (128) 4,131,962
Expenses:                            
Policy benefits1,475,477
 612,725
 36,751
       3,795
(3) 
 2,128,748
1,549,602
 628,640
 35,836
     13,797
(3,4) 
2,227,875
Required interest on:              

            

Policy reserves(577,827) (73,382) (51,131) 702,340
       
(607,007) (77,792) (49,571) 734,370
     
Deferred acquisition costs178,946
 23,060
 807
 (202,813)       
186,236
 23,454
 690
 (210,380)     
Amortization of acquisition costs374,499
 90,385
 4,179
         469,063
396,268
 96,519
 2,466
     (4,850)
(4) 
490,403
Commissions, premium taxes, and non-deferred acquisition costs164,476
 84,819
 38
       (159)
(2) 
 249,174
177,111
 86,044
 32
     1,673
(2,5) 
264,860
Insurance administrative expense (1)
        196,598
   553
(4) 
 197,151
        210,590
 


210,590
Parent expense          $8,587
   8,587
        9,631
   9,631
Stock-based compensation expense          26,326
   26,326
        33,654
 3,380
(6) 
37,034
Interest expense      83,345
       83,345
      84,532
     84,532
Total expenses1,615,571
 737,607
 (9,356) 582,872
 196,598
 34,913
 4,189
 3,162,394
1,702,210
 756,865
 (10,547) 608,522
 253,875
 14,000
 3,324,925
Subtotal573,762
 210,056
 9,394
 224,031
 (195,064) (34,913) (4,348) 782,918
604,337
 219,508
 10,562
 239,363
 (252,605) (14,128) 807,037
Non-operating items            4,348
(3,4) 
 4,348
          14,128
(3,4,5,6) 
14,128
Measure of segment profitability (pretax)$573,762
 $210,056
 $9,394
 $224,031
 $(195,064) $(34,913) $
 787,266
$604,337
 $219,508
 $10,562
 $239,363
 $(252,605) $
 821,165
Deduct applicable income taxesDeduct applicable income taxes (237,906)Deduct applicable income taxes (247,484)
Net operating income from continuing operationsNet operating income from continuing operations 549,360
Net operating income from continuing operations 573,681
Add back income taxes applicable to segment profitabilityAdd back income taxes applicable to segment profitability 237,906
Add back income taxes applicable to segment profitability 247,484
Add (deduct) realized investment gains (losses)Add (deduct) realized investment gains (losses) (10,683)Add (deduct) realized investment gains (losses) 23,611
Deduct administrative settlements (3)
Deduct administrative settlements (3)
 (3,795)
Deduct administrative settlements (3)
 (8,659)
Deduct non-operating fees (4)
 (553)
Deduct non-operating expensesDeduct non-operating expenses (288)
Deduct guaranty fund assessmentsDeduct guaranty fund assessments (1,801)
Deduct increase in stock-based compensation expense due to Tax LegislationDeduct increase in stock-based compensation expense due to Tax Legislation (3,380)
Income before income taxes per Consolidated Statement of Operations
Income before income taxes per Consolidated Statement of Operations
 $772,235
Income before income taxes per Consolidated Statement of Operations
 $830,648
(1)Administrative expense is not allocated to insurance segments.
(2)Elimination of intersegment commission.
(3)Administrative settlements.
(4)Non-operating expense.
(5)Guaranty fund assessments.
(6)Recognition of a one-time increase in stock-based compensation expense due to Tax Legislation.







TORCHMARK CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)
(Dollar amounts in thousands except per share data)
Note 14—Business Segments (continued)

 For the year 2016
 Life Health Annuity Investment Corporate & Other Adjustments Consolidated
Revenue:              
Premium$2,189,333
 $947,663
 $38
        $3,137,034
Net investment income      $806,903
      806,903
Other income        $1,534
 $(159)
(2) 
 1,375
    Total revenue2,189,333
 947,663
 38
 806,903
 1,534
 (159)  3,945,312
Expenses:              
Policy benefits1,475,477
 612,725
 36,751
     3,795
(3) 
 2,128,748
Required interest on:              
  Policy reserves(577,827) (73,382) (51,131) 702,340
      
  Deferred acquisition costs178,946
 23,060
 807
 (202,813)      
Amortization of acquisition costs374,499
 90,385
 4,179
        469,063
Commissions, premium taxes, and non-deferred acquisition costs164,476
 84,819
 38
     (159)
(2) 
 249,174
Insurance administrative expense(1)
        196,598
 553
(4) 
 197,151
Parent expense        8,587
    8,587
Stock-based compensation expense        26,326
    26,326
Interest expense      83,345
      83,345
    Total expenses1,615,571
 737,607
 (9,356) 582,872
 231,511
 4,189
  3,162,394
Subtotal573,762
 210,056
 9,394
 224,031
 (229,977) (4,348)  782,918
   Non-operating items          4,348
(3,4) 
 4,348
    Measure of segment profitability (pretax)$573,762
 $210,056
 $9,394
 $224,031
 $(229,977) $
  787,266
Deduct applicable income taxes  (237,906)
Net operating income from continuing operations  549,360
Add back income taxes applicable to segment profitability  237,906
Add (deduct) realized investment gains (losses)  (10,683)
Deduct administrative settlements  (3,795)
Deduct non-operating fees  (553)
Income before income taxes per Consolidated Statement of Operations
  $772,235
(1) Administrative expense is not allocated to insurance segments.
(2) Elimination of intersegment commission.
(3) Administrative settlements.
(4) Non-operating fees.





Index to Financial Statements





TORCHMARK CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)
(Dollar amounts in thousands except per share data)
 
Note 14—Business Segments (continued)

For the year 2015For the Year 2015
Life Health Annuity Investment Other Corporate Adjustments ConsolidatedLife Health Annuity Investment Corporate & Other Adjustments Consolidated
Revenue:                            
Premium$2,073,065
 $925,520
 $135
         $2,998,720
$2,073,065
 $925,520
 $135
       $2,998,720
Net investment income      $773,951
       773,951
      $773,951
     773,951
Other income        $2,379
   $(194)
(2) 
 2,185
        $2,379
 $(194)
(2) 
 2,185
Total revenue2,073,065
 925,520
 135
 773,951
 2,379
   (194) 3,774,856
2,073,065
 925,520
 135
 773,951
 2,379
 (194) 3,774,856
Expenses:                            
Policy benefits1,374,608
 602,610
 38,994
         2,016,212
1,374,608
 602,610
 38,994
     


 2,016,212
Required interest on:                            
Policy reserves(552,298) (69,057) (53,295) 674,650
       
(552,298) (69,057) (53,295) 674,650
     
Deferred acquisition costs172,947
 22,760
 1,138
 (196,845)       
172,947
 22,760
 1,138
 (196,845)     
Amortization of acquisition costs353,595
 83,341
 8,689
         445,625
353,595
 83,341
 8,689
       445,625
Commissions, premium taxes, and non-deferred acquisition costs154,811
 81,489
 41
       1,200
(2,3) 
 237,541
154,811
 81,489
 41
     1,200
(2,3) 
 237,541
Insurance administrative expense (1)
        186,191
     186,191
        186,191
 

 186,191
Parent expense          $9,003
   9,003
        9,003
 


 9,003
Stock-based compensation expense          28,664
   28,664
        28,664
   28,664
Interest expense      76,642
       76,642
      76,642
     76,642
Total expenses1,503,663
 721,143
 (4,433) 554,447
 186,191
 37,667
 1,200
 2,999,878
1,503,663
 721,143
 (4,433) 554,447
 223,858
 1,200
 2,999,878
Subtotal569,402
 204,377
 4,568
 219,504
 (183,812) (37,667) (1,394) 774,978
569,402
 204,377
 4,568
 219,504
 (221,479) (1,394) 774,978
Non-operating items            1,394
(3) 
 1,394
          1,394
(3) 
 1,394
Measure of segment profitability (pretax)$569,402
 $204,377
 $4,568
 $219,504
 $(183,812) $(37,667) $
 776,372
$569,402
 $204,377
 $4,568
 $219,504
 $(221,479) $
 776,372
Deduct applicable income taxesDeduct applicable income taxes (253,459)Deduct applicable income taxes (253,459)
Net operating income from continuing operationsNet operating income from continuing operations 522,913
Net operating income from continuing operations 522,913
Add back income taxes applicable to segment profitabilityAdd back income taxes applicable to segment profitability 253,459
Add back income taxes applicable to segment profitability 253,459
Add (deduct) realized investment gains (losses)Add (deduct) realized investment gains (losses) (8,791)Add (deduct) realized investment gains (losses) (8,791)
Deduct administrative settlements (3)
Deduct administrative settlements (3)
 (1,394)
Deduct administrative settlements (3)
 (1,394)
Income before income taxes per Consolidated Statement of Operations
Income before income taxes per Consolidated Statement of Operations
 $766,187
Income before income taxes per Consolidated Statement of Operations
 $766,187

(1) Administrative expense is not allocated to insurance segments.
(2) Elimination of intersegment commission.
(3) Administrative settlements.






Index to Financial Statements

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)
(Dollar amounts in thousands except per share data)
Note 14—Business Segments (continued)

 For the Year 2014
 Life Health Annuity Investment Other Corporate Adjustments Consolidated
Revenue:                
Premium$1,966,300
 $869,440
 $400
          $2,836,140
Net investment income      $758,286
        758,286
Other income        $2,354
   $(233)
(2) 
 2,121
    Total revenue1,966,300
 869,440
 400
 758,286
 2,354
   (233)  3,596,547
Expenses:                
Policy benefits1,293,384
 559,817
 42,005
       8,178
(4) 
 1,903,384
Required interest on:                
  Policy reserves(530,192) (64,401) (55,255) 649,848
        
  Deferred acquisition costs168,100
 22,499
 1,453
 (192,052)        
Amortization of acquisition costs335,345
 72,731
 7,838
          415,914
Commissions, premium taxes, and non-deferred acquisition costs143,174
 79,475
 47
       (233)
(2) 
 222,463
Insurance administrative expense (1)
        174,832
   2,422
(3) 
 177,254
Parent expense          $8,159
 (85)
(3) 
 8,074
Stock-based compensation expense          32,203
    32,203
Interest expense      76,126
        76,126
    Total expenses1,409,811
 670,121
 (3,912) 533,922
 174,832
 40,362
 10,282
  2,835,418
Subtotal556,489
 199,319
 4,312
 224,364
 (172,478) (40,362) (10,515)  761,129
   Non-operating items            10,515
(3,4) 
 10,515
    Measure of segment profitability (pretax)$556,489
 $199,319
 $4,312
 $224,364
 $(172,478) $(40,362) $
  771,644
Deduct applicable income taxes  (252,041)
Net operating income from continuing operations  519,603
Add back income taxes applicable to segment profitability  252,041
Add (deduct) realized investment gains (losses)  23,548
Deduct legal settlement expenses (3)
  (2,337)
Deduct administrative settlements (4)
  (8,178)
Income before income taxes per Consolidated Statement of Operations
  $784,677

(1) Administrative expense is not allocated to insurance segments.
(2) Elimination of intersegment commission.
(3) Legal settlement expenses.
(4) Administrative settlements.



Index to Financial Statements

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)
(Dollar amounts in thousands except per share data)
Note 14—Business Segments (continued)

The following table summarizes the measures of segment profitability as determined in the three preceding tables for comparison with prior periods. The table also reconciles segment profits to net income.
Analysis of Profitability by Segment
 2016 2015 2014 2016
Change
 % 2015
Change
 %
Life insurance underwriting margin$573,762
 $569,402
 $556,489
 $4,360
 1
 $12,913
 2
Health insurance underwriting margin210,056
 204,377
 199,319
 5,679
 3
 5,058
 3
Annuity underwriting margin9,394
 4,568
 4,312
 4,826
 106
 256
 6
Excess investment income224,031
 219,504
 224,364
 4,527
 2
 (4,860) (2)
Other insurance:             
Other income1,534
 2,379
 2,354
 (845) (36) 25
 1
Administrative expense(196,598) (186,191) (174,832) (10,407) 6
 (11,359) 6
Corporate and adjustments(34,913) (37,667) (40,362) 2,754
 (7) 2,695
 (7)
Pre-tax total787,266
 776,372
 771,644
 10,894
 1
 4,728
 1
Applicable taxes(1)
(237,906) (253,459) (252,041) 15,553
 (6) (1,418) 1
Net operating income from continuing operations549,360
 522,913
 519,603
 26,447
 5
 3,310
 1
Discontinued operations (after tax)(2)
10,189
 10,807
 14,865
 (618) (6) (4,058) (27)
Total559,549
 533,720
 534,468
 25,829
 5
 (748) 
Realized gains (losses)—investments (after tax)(6,944) (5,714) 15,306
 (1,230)   (21,020)  
Legal settlement expenses (after tax)
 
 (1,519) 
   1,519
  
Administrative settlements (after tax)(2,467) (906) (5,316) (1,561)   4,410
  
Non-operating fees (after tax)(359) 
 
 (359)   
  
Net income$549,779
 $527,100
 $542,939
 $22,679
 4
 $(15,839) (3)
(1) Certain current year amounts were prospectively adjusted to give effect to the adoption of ASU 2016-09 related to excess tax benefits from stock compensation as described in Note 1—Significant Accounting Policiesunder "Accounting Pronouncements Adopted in the Current Year."
(2) Income from discontinued operations (after tax) is included for purposes of reconciling to net income.

Assets for each segment are reported based on a specific identification basis. The insurance segments’ assets contain deferred acquisition costs (including the value of insurance purchased).DAC. The investment segment includes the investment portfolio, cash, and accrued investment income. Goodwill is assigned to the insurance segments at the time of purchase based on the excess of cost over the fair value of assets acquired for the benefit of that segment.purchase. All other assets are included in the Other category. The table below reconciles segment assets to total assets as reported in the consolidated financial statements.
 
Assets by Segment
At December 31, 2016At December 31, 2017
Life Health Annuity Investment Other ConsolidatedLife Health Annuity Investment Other Consolidated
Cash and invested assets      $15,955,891
   $15,955,891
      $17,853,047
   $17,853,047
Accrued investment income      223,148
   223,148
      233,453
   233,453
Deferred acquisition costs$3,261,220
 $512,701
 $9,237
     3,783,158
$3,423,296
 $529,068
 $5,699
     3,958,063
Goodwill309,609
 131,982
       441,591
309,609
 131,982
       441,591
Other assets        $1,032,299
 1,032,299
        $988,831
 988,831
Total assets$3,570,829
 $644,683
 $9,237
 $16,179,039
 $1,032,299
 $21,436,087
$3,732,905
 $661,050
 $5,699
 $18,086,500
 $988,831
 $23,474,985

Index to Financial Statements

TORCHMARK CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)
(Dollar amounts in thousands except per share data)
 
Note 14—Business Segments (continued)

At December 31, 2015At December 31, 2016
Life Health Annuity Investment Other ConsolidatedLife Health Annuity Investment Other Consolidated
Cash and invested assets      $14,405,073
   $14,405,073
      $15,955,891
   $15,955,891
Accrued investment income      209,915
   209,915
      223,148
   223,148
Deferred acquisition costs$3,098,656
 $502,535
 $15,944
     3,617,135
$3,261,220
 $512,701
 $9,237
     3,783,158
Goodwill309,609
 131,982
       441,591
309,609
 131,982
       441,591
Other assets        $1,179,499
 1,179,499
        $1,032,299
 1,032,299
Total assets$3,408,265
 $634,517
 $15,944
 $14,614,988
 $1,179,499
 $19,853,213
$3,570,829
 $644,683
 $9,237
 $16,179,039
 $1,032,299
 $21,436,087
 
Liabilities for each segment are reported also on a specific identification basis similar to the assets. The insurance segments' liabilities contain future policy benefits, unearned and advance premiums, and policy claims and other benefits payable. Other policyholders' funds are included in Other as well as current and deferred income taxes payable. Debt represents both short and long term.long-term.

Liabilities by Segment
 At December 31, 2017
 Life Health Annuity Investment Other Consolidated
Future policy benefits$10,353,286
 $1,831,338
 $1,254,848
     $13,439,472
Unearned and advance premiums16,927
 44,503
       61,430
Policy claims and other benefits payable186,429
 146,865
       333,294
Debt      $1,460,268
   1,460,268
Other        $1,949,100
 1,949,100
Total liabilities$10,556,642
 $2,022,706
 $1,254,848

$1,460,268

$1,949,100

$17,243,564
 At December 31, 2016
 Life Health Annuity Investment Other Consolidated
Future policy benefits$9,825,776
 $1,706,870
 $1,293,191
     $12,825,837
Unearned and advance premiums16,828
 47,189
       64,017
Policy claims and other benefits payable156,437
 143,128
       299,565
Debt      $1,397,640
   1,397,640
Other        $2,282,167
 2,282,167
Total liabilities$9,999,041
 $1,897,187
 $1,293,191
 $1,397,640
 $2,282,167
 $16,869,226
 At December 31, 2015
 Life Health Annuity Investment Other Consolidated
Future policy benefits$9,327,561
 $1,600,240
 $1,318,010
     $12,245,811
Unearned and advance premiums17,381
 49,640
       67,021
Policy claims and other benefits payable135,778
 137,120
       272,898
Debt      $1,233,862
   1,233,862
Other        $1,978,069
 1,978,069
Total liabilities$9,480,720
 $1,787,000
 $1,318,010
 $1,233,862
 $1,978,069
 $15,797,661


Index to Financial Statements

TORCHMARK CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)
(Dollar amounts in thousands, except per share data)

Note 15—Commitments and Contingencies
 
Reinsurance: Insurance affiliates of Torchmark reinsure that portion of insurance risk which is in excess of their retention limits. Retention limits for ordinary life insurance range up to $2 million per life. Life insurance ceded represented 0.4% of total life insurance in force at December 31, 2016.2017. Insurance ceded on life and accident and health products represented 0.3%0.2% of premium income for 2016.2017. Torchmark would be liable for the reinsured risks ceded to other companies to the extent that such reinsuring companies are unable to meet their obligations.
 
Insurance affiliates also assume insurance risks of other external companies. Life reinsurance assumed represented 1.9%1.8% of life insurance in force at December 31, 20162017 and reinsurance assumed on life and accident and health products represented 0.7% of premium income for 2016.2017.
 
Leases: Torchmark leases office space, office equipment, and aviation equipment under a variety of operating lease arrangements. The Company does not have any capital leases.

Rental expense for operating leases for each of the three years ended December 31, 20162017 is as follows:
 Year Ended December 31,
 2016 2015 2014
Rental expense$6,520
 $6,722
 $4,200
 Year Ended December 31,
 2017 2016 2015
Rental expense$6,446
 $6,520
 $6,722

Future minimum rental commitments required under operating leases having remaining noncancelable lease terms in excess of one year at December 31, 20162017 were as follows:
 Year Ended December 31,
 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 Thereafter
Operating lease commitments$8,182
 $5,254
 $5,047
 $4,898
 $4,625
 $7,801
 Year Ended December 31,
 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 Thereafter
Operating lease commitments$3,483
 $3,298
 $3,124
 $2,886
 $1,943
 $1,830

Low-Income Housing Tax Credit InterestsPurchase Commitments: As describedTorchmark has various long-term noncancelable purchase commitments as well as commitments to provide capital for low-income housing tax credit interests. See further discussion related to tax credits in Note 1—Significant Accounting Policies, Torchmark had $280 million invested in entities which provide certain tax benefits at December 31, 2016. As of December 31, 2016, Torchmark remained obligated under these commitments as follows:.
 Year Ended December 31,
 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 Thereafter
Low-Income housing commitments$34,162
 $18,350
 $2,964
 $838
 $302
 $202
 Year Ended December 31,
 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 Thereafter
Purchase commitments$27,326
 $9,198
 $3,257
 $2,213
 $2,169
 $246,836

Investments: As of December 31, 2016,2017, Torchmark hadis committed to purchase $8.4$210 million of private placement fixed maturities managed bycommercial mortgage loan participations from a third party in early 2017.party.
 
Guarantees: At December 31, 2016,2017, Torchmark had in place four guarantee agreements, of which were either parent companyParent Company guarantees of subsidiary obligations to a third party, or parent companyParent Company guarantees of obligations between wholly-owned subsidiaries. As of December 31, 2016,2017, Torchmark had no liability with respect to these guarantees.
 
Letters of Credit: Torchmark has guaranteed letters of credit in connection with its credit facility with a group of banks as disclosed in Note 11—Debt. The letters of credit were issued by TMK Re, Ltd., a wholly-owned subsidiary, to secure TMK Re, Ltd.’s obligation for claims on certain policies reinsured by TMK Re, Ltd. that were sold by other Torchmark insurance companies. These letters of credit facilitate TMK Re, Ltd.’s ability to reinsure the business of Torchmark’s insurance carriers. The agreement expires in 2021. The maximum amount of letters of credit available is $250 million. The Torchmark parent companyParent Company would be liable to the extent that TMK Re, Ltd. does not pay the reinsured party. Letters of credit outstanding were $177 million at December 31, 20162017 and 2015.2016.


Index to Financial Statements

TORCHMARK CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)
(Dollar amounts in thousands except per share data)
 
Note 15—Commitments and Contingencies (continued)

Equipment leases: Torchmark has guaranteed performance of certain subsidiaries as lessees under three leasing arrangements which include two for aviation equipment and one for computer software, furniture, and equipment. One aviation lease expires in August 2022 and the second expires in September 2024. The office equipment lease expiresexpired in December 2017. At December 31, 2016,2017, total remaining undiscounted payments under the leases were approximately $15$10 million. The Torchmark parent companyParent Company would be responsible for any subsidiary obligation in the event the subsidiary did not make payments or otherwise perform under the terms of the lease.
 
Unclaimed Property Audits: Torchmark subsidiaries are currently the subject of audits regarding the identification, reporting and escheatment of unclaimed property arising from life insurance policies and a limited number of annuity contracts. These audits are being conducted by private entities that have contracted with forty-seven states through their respective Departments of Revenue, and have not resulted in any financial assessment from any state nor indicated any liability. The audits are wide-ranging and seek large amounts of data regarding claims handling, procedures, and payments of contract benefits arising from unreported death claims. No estimate of range can be made at this time for loss contingencies related to possible administrative penalties or amounts that could be payable to the states for the escheatment of abandoned property.
 
Litigation: Torchmark and its subsidiaries, in common with the insurance industry in general, are subject to litigation, including claims involving tax matters, alleged breaches of contract, torts, including bad faith and fraud claims based on alleged wrongful or fraudulent acts of agents of Torchmark’s subsidiaries, employment discrimination, and miscellaneous other causes of action. Based upon information presently available, and in light of legal and other factual defenses available to Torchmark and its subsidiaries, management does not believe that such litigation will have a material adverse effect on Torchmark’s financial condition, future operating results or liquidity; however, assessing the eventual outcome of litigation necessarily involves forward-looking speculation as to judgments to be made by judges, juries and appellate courts in the future. This bespeaks caution, particularly in states with reputations for high punitive damage verdicts. Torchmark’s management recognizes that large punitive damage awards bearing little or no relation to actual damages continue to be awarded by juries in jurisdictions in which Torchmark and its subsidiaries have substantial business, creating the potential for unpredictable material adverse judgments in any given punitive damage suit.

As previously reported,On February 1, 2018, a putative class action litigation was filed on February 10, 2015 against Torchmark subsidiary, GlobeAmerican Income Life And Accident Insurance Company in Oklahoma County, OklahomaU.S. District Court (Proctorfor the Northern District of Texas, Dallas Division (Bruce v. GlobeAmerican Income Life And Accident Insurance Company, et al., Case No. CJ-2015-838) asserting claims for breach3:18-cv-00258-G). The plaintiff, a former insurance sales agent of American Income who is suing on behalf of all current and former American Income sales agents contracted through State General Agent Stephen Jubrey’s agency office at any time since January 31, 2015 through the implied covenantsfinal disposition of good faiththis matter, asserts that such agents are employees rather than independent contractors as they are classified by American Income. He alleges failure to pay minimum wages, overtime wages and fair dealing and for false representation, deceit and conversionother applicable monies in connectionaccordance with Globe’s denial of plaintiff’s claim onthe Fair Labor Standards Act. The plaintiff seeks, in a life insurance policy for non-payment of premium. Plaintiff, who had alleged that Globe had improperly retained 12 monthly premium payments on a policy that was treated as lapsed or not returned to in-force status, seeksjury trial, actual and punitive damages, prejudgmentpre- and post-judgment interest, attorney fees, costs and other relief, including injunctive relief. Plaintiff subsequently amended his complaint to add allegations of conversion and civil theft on behalf of a purported class of Globe’s U.S. policyholders who had paid premiums retained by Globe when their policies were lapsed and not reinstated at the time of the premium payments. Globe removed the case to the U.S. District Court for the Western District of Oklahoma (Case No. 15-CV-0070-M) on July 10, 2015 and filed a Motion to Dismiss on July 17, 2015. The Court denied plaintiff’s Motion to Remand back to state court on October 26, 2015, but allowed the plaintiff to amend the complaint to assert a putative class action in federal court. Plaintiff filed a Motion for Class Certification on September 23, 2016. Globe filed a Response in Opposition on November 4, 2016. The Court has not yet ruled on Plaintiff’s Motion.

With respect to its current litigation, at this time management believes that the possibility of a material judgment adverse to Torchmark is remote, and no estimate of range can be made for loss contingencies that are at least reasonably possible but not accrued.

Guaranty Fund Assessment: In 2017, the Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania issued orders placing Penn Treaty Network America Insurance Company (Penn Treaty) and affiliate American Network Insurance Company (ANIC) in liquidation due to financial difficulties. In such instances, the various state guaranty fund associations employ funding mechanisms, through assessments to their member companies, to cover the obligations of the insolvent entities. Consequently, the Company continues to receive guaranty fund assessments from the state associations related to these companies. The Company has projected its share of the ultimate assessments from these insolvencies based on assumptions about future events and its market share of premiums by state. The total estimated assessment for Torchmark's subsidiaries is approximately $9.6 million of which $7.8 million is estimated to be recoverable through state premium tax credit offsets. We anticipate the remaining $1.8 million will be unrecoverable.

Index to Financial Statements

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)
(Dollar amounts in thousands except per share data)
Note 16—Selected Quarterly Data (Unaudited) (continued)

Note 16—Selected Quarterly Data (Unaudited)
 
The following is an unaudited summary of quarterly results for the two years ended December 31, 2016.2017. The information includes all adjustments (consisting of normal accruals) which management considers necessary for a fair presentation of the results of operations for these periods.
Three Months EndedThree Months Ended
March 31, June 30, September 30, December 31,March 31, June 30, September 30, December 31,
2016:       
2017:       
Premium income$779,860
 $785,855
 $783,411
 $787,908
$820,631
 $816,614
 $819,217
 $826,473
Net investment income197,053
 201,642
 202,720
 205,488
208,282
 212,776
 213,872
 212,955
Realized investment gains (losses)293
 4,005
 3,482
 (18,463)(5,748) (705) 12,595
 17,469
Total revenue977,627
 991,884
 989,773
 975,345
1,023,581
 1,029,078
 1,046,015
 1,056,899
Policyholder benefits524,973
 531,485
 532,152
 540,138
557,776
 556,415
 551,219
 562,465
Amortization of deferred acquisition costs118,806
 117,245
 116,821
 116,191
125,908
 122,121
 122,334
 120,040
Pretax income from continuing operations195,448
 199,344
 201,461
 175,982
191,741
 201,926
 220,610
 216,371
Income from continuing operations133,574
 139,294
 141,910
 124,812
137,178
 140,363
 153,346
 1,027,376
Income from discontinued operations(9,541) (865) 9,959
 10,636
(3,637) (90) (12) (30)
Net income(1)
124,033
 138,429
 151,869
 135,448
133,541
 140,273
 153,334
 1,027,346
Basic net income per common share:              
Continuing operations1.10
 1.16
 1.19
 1.05
1.16
 1.20
 1.32
 8.93
Discontinued operations(0.08) (0.01) 0.08
 0.09
(0.03) 
 
 
Total basic net income per share1.02
 1.15
 1.27
 1.14
Total basic net income per common share1.13
 1.20
 1.32
 8.93
Diluted net income per common share:(1)
              
Continuing operations1.08
 1.13
 1.16
 1.03
1.14
 1.18
 1.29
 8.71
Discontinued operations(0.07) 
 0.09
 0.09
(0.03) 
 
 
Total diluted net income per share1.01
 1.13
 1.25
 1.12
Total diluted net income per common share1.11
 1.18
 1.29
 8.71
2015:       
Three Months Ended
March 31, June 30, September 30, December 31,
2016:       
Premium income$742,056
 $752,484
 $748,109
 $756,071
$779,860
 $785,855
 $783,411
 $787,908
Net investment income191,596
 194,823
 193,213
 194,319
197,053
 201,642
 202,720
 205,488
Realized investment gains (losses)119
 2,613
 5,140
 (16,663)293
 4,005
 3,482
 (18,463)
Total revenue934,440
 950,611
 947,154
 933,860
977,627
 991,884
 989,773
 975,345
Policyholder benefits497,775
 508,316
 501,156
 508,965
524,973
 531,485
 532,152
 540,138
Amortization of deferred acquisition costs110,660
 111,738
 111,643
 111,584
118,806
 117,245
 116,821
 116,191
Pretax income from continuing operations194,477
 196,723
 199,009
 175,978
195,448
 199,344
 201,461
 175,982
Income from continuing operations130,778
 132,527
 133,858
 119,130
133,574
 139,294
 141,910
 124,812
Income from discontinued operations(9,130) (5,417) 11,528
 13,826
(9,541) (865) 9,959
 10,636
Net income121,648
 127,110
 145,386
 132,956
124,033
 138,429
 151,869
 135,448
Basic net income per common share:              
Continuing operations1.03
 1.05
 1.08
 0.97
1.10
 1.16
 1.19
 1.05
Discontinued operations(0.07) (0.04) 0.09
 0.11
(0.08) (0.01) 0.08
 0.09
Total basic net income per share0.96
 1.01
 1.17
 1.08
Total basic net income per common share1.02
 1.15
 1.27
 1.14
Diluted net income per common share:              
Continuing operations1.02
 1.04
 1.06
 0.96
1.08
 1.13
 1.16
 1.03
Discontinued operations(0.07) (0.04) 0.09
 0.11
(0.07) 
 0.09
 0.09
Total diluted net income per share0.95
 1.00
 1.15
 1.07
Total diluted net income per common share1.01
 1.13
 1.25
 1.12
(1)
Due to the adoption in 2016 of ASU 2016-09, certain current year balances related to excess tax benefits from stock compensation were adjusted prospectively as described in Note 1—Significant Accounting Policiesunder "Stock Compensation."

Index to Financial Statements

Item 9. Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure
 
No disagreements with accountants on any matter of accounting principles or practices or financial statement disclosure have been reported on a Form 8-K within the twenty-four months prior to the date of the most recent financial statements.
 
Item 9A. Controls and Procedures
 
Torchmark, under the direction of the Co-Chairmen and Chief Executive Officers and the Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer, has established disclosure controls and procedures that are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed by Torchmark in the reports that it files or submits under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the SEC’s rules and forms. The disclosure controls and procedures are also intended to ensure that such information is accumulated and communicated to Torchmark’s management, including the Co-Chairmen and Chief Executive Officers and the Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosures.
 
As of the end of the fiscal year completed December 31, 2016,2017, an evaluation was performed under the supervision and with the participation of Torchmark management, including the Co-Chairmen and Chief Executive Officers and the Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer, of Torchmark’s disclosure controls and procedures (as those terms are defined in Rule 13a-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934). Based upon their evaluation, the Co-Chairmen and Chief Executive Officers and the Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer have concluded that Torchmark’s disclosure controls and procedures are effective as of the date of this Form 10-K. In compliance with Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. § 1350), each of these officers executed a Certification included as an exhibit to this Form 10-K.
 
As of the quarter ended December 31, 2016,2017, there have not been any changes in Torchmark’s internal control over financial reporting or in other factors that could significantly affect this control over financial reporting subsequent to the date of their evaluation which have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, Torchmark’s internal control over financial reporting. No material weaknesses in such internal controls were identified in the evaluation and as a consequence, no corrective action was required to be taken.
 
Item 9B. Other Information
 
There were no items required.

Index to Financial Statements

Management’s Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting
 
Management at Torchmark Corporation is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting for the Company and for assessing the effectiveness of internal control on an annual basis. As a framework for assessing internal control over financial reporting, the Company utilizes the criteria for effective internal control over financial reporting described in Internal ControlIntegrated Framework (2013) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission.
 
There are inherent limitations in the effectiveness of any internal control, including the possibility of human error and the circumvention or overriding of controls. Accordingly, even effective internal controls can provide only reasonable assurance with respect to financial statement preparation. Further, because of changes in conditions, the effectiveness of internal control may vary over time.
 
Management evaluated the Company’s internal control over financial reporting, and based on its assessment, determined that the Company’s internal control over financial reporting was effective as of December 31, 2016.2017. The Company’s independent registered public accounting firm has issued an attestation report on the Company’s internal control over financial reporting as stated in their report which is included herein.
 
/s/ Gary L. Coleman 
Gary L. Coleman
Co-Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
 
  
/s/ Larry M. Hutchison 
Larry M. Hutchison
Co-Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
 
  
/s/ Frank M. Svoboda 
Frank M. Svoboda
Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
 
 
February 27, 201726, 2018

Index to Financial Statements

REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
 
To the shareholders and the Board of Directors and Shareholders of
Torchmark Corporation (McKinney, Texas)
McKinney, Texas
Opinion on Internal Control over Financial Reporting
We have audited the internal control over financial reporting of Torchmark Corporation and subsidiaries (Torchmark) as of December 31, 2016,2017, based on criteria established in Internal Control - Integrated Framework (2013) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission. Torchmark'sCommission (COSO). In our opinion, Torchmark maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2017, based on criteria established in Internal Control - Integrated Framework issued by COSO.
We have also audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (PCAOB), the consolidated financial statements and financial statement schedules as of and for the year ended December 31, 2017 of Torchmark and our report dated February 26, 2018 expressed an unqualified opinion on those financial statements and financial statement schedules.
Basis for Opinion
Torchmark’s management is responsible for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, included in the accompanying Management’s Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on Torchmark'sTorchmark’s internal control over financial reporting based on our audit.

We are a public accounting firm registered with the PCAOB and are required to be independent with respect to the Company in accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.
We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States).PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material respects. Our audit included obtaining an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, assessing the risk that a material weakness exists, testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control based on the assessed risk, and performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.

Definition and Limitations of Internal Control over Financial Reporting
A company'scompany’s internal control over financial reporting is a process designed by, or under the supervision of, the company's principal executive and principal financial officers, or persons performing similar functions, and effected by the company's board of directors, management, and other personnel to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A company'scompany’s internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (1) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company; and (3) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the company'scompany’s assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.

Because of theits inherent limitations, of internal control over financial reporting including the possibility of collusion or improper management override of controls, material misstatements due to error or fraud may not be preventedprevent or detected on a timely basis.detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of the effectiveness of the internal control over financial reporting to future periods are subject to the risk that the controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.

In our opinion, Torchmark maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2016, based on the criteria established in Internal Control - Integrated Framework (2013) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission.

We have also audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the consolidated financial statements and financial statement schedules as of and for the year ended December 31, 2016 of Torchmark and our report dated February 27, 2017 expressed an unqualified opinion on those financial statements and financial statement schedules.

/s/ DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP
Dallas, Texas
February 27, 201726, 2018

Index to Financial Statements

PART III
 
Item 10. Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance
 
Information required by this item is incorporated by reference from the sections entitled “Election of Directors,” “Profiles of Director Nominees,” “Executive Officers,” “Audit Committee Report,” “Governance Guidelines and Codes of Ethics,” “Director Qualification Standards,” “Procedures for Director Nominations by Stockholders,Shareholders,” and “Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance” in the Proxy Statement for the Annual Meeting of StockholdersShareholders to be held April 27, 201726, 2018 (the Proxy Statement), which is to be filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC).
 
Item 11. Executive Compensation
 
Information required by this item is incorporated by reference from the sections entitled “Compensation Discussion and Analysis”, “Compensation Committee Report”, “Summary Compensation Table”, “2016“2017 Grants of Plan-based Awards”, “Outstanding Equity Awards at Fiscal Year End 2016”2017”, “Option Exercises and Stock Vested during Fiscal Year Ended December 31, 2016”2017”, “Pension Benefits at December 31, 2016”2017”, “Potential Payments upon Termination or Change in Control”, “2016“2017 Director Compensation”, “Payments to Directors” and “Compensation Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation” in the Proxy Statement, which is to be filed with the SEC.
 
Item 12. Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters
 
(a)
Equity Compensation Plan Information as of December 31, 20162017
Plan Category
Number of securities to be
issued upon exercise of
outstanding options,
warrants, and rights
 
Weighted-average
exercise price of
outstanding options,
warrants, and rights
 
Number of securities
remaining available for
future issuance under
equity compensation plans
Number of securities to be
issued upon exercise of
outstanding options,
warrants, and rights
 
Weighted-average
exercise price of
outstanding options,
warrants, and rights
 
Number of securities
remaining available for
future issuance under
equity compensation plans
Equity compensation plans approved by security holders6,973,591
 $44.64
 5,088,461
6,753,801
 $53.59
 2,964,320
Equity compensation plans not approved by security holders
 
 

 
 
Total6,973,591
 $44.64
 5,088,461
6,753,801
 $53.59
 2,964,320
(b)Security ownership of certain beneficial owners:
Information required by this item is incorporated by reference from the section entitled “Principal Stockholders”Shareholders” in the Proxy Statement, which is to be filed with the SEC.
(c)Security ownership of management:
Information required by this item is incorporated by reference from the section entitled “Stock Ownership” in the Proxy Statement, which is to be filed with the SEC.
(d)Changes in control:
Torchmark knows of no arrangements, including any pledges by any person of its securities, the operation of which may at a subsequent date result in a change of control.
 
Item 13. Certain Relationships and Related Transactions and Director Independence
 
Information required by this item is incorporated by reference from the sections entitled “Related Party Transaction Policy and Transactions” and “Director Independence Determinations” in the Proxy Statement, which is to be filed with the SEC.
 
Item 14. Principal Accountant Fees and Services
 
Information required by this Item is incorporated by reference from the section entitled “Principal Accounting Firm Fees” and “Pre-approval Policy”Policy for Accounting Fees” in the Proxy Statement, which is to be filed with the SEC.

Index to Financial Statements

PART IV
 
Item 15.    Exhibits and Financial Statement Schedules
 
Index of documents filed as a part of this report:
 
 Page of this report
Financial Statements: 
  
Torchmark Corporation and Subsidiaries: 
Schedules Supporting Financial Statements for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2016:2017: 
Schedules not referred to have been omitted as inapplicable or not required by Regulation S-X. 

Index to Financial Statements

EXHIBITS
 
 
   
Page of
this
Report
3.1
   
     
3.2
   
     
4.1
 Specimen Common Stock Certificate (incorporated by reference from Exhibit 4(a) to Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 1989)
4.2
4.3
Junior Subordinated Indenture, dated November 2, 2001, between Torchmark Corporation and The Bank of New York defining the rights of the 7 3/4% Junior Subordinated Debentures (incorporated by reference from Exhibit 4.3 to Form 8-K dated November 2, 2001)
  
     
4.44.2
   
     
4.54.3
 Second Supplemental Indenture dated as of June 23, 2006 between Torchmark Corporation, J.P. Morgan Trust Company, National Association and The Bank of New York Trust Company, N.A. (incorporated by reference from Exhibit 4.1 to Form 8-K filed June 23, 2006)
4.6
  
     
4.74.4
   
     
4.84.5
 First Supplemental  
     
4.94.6
 Certificate and Declaration of Trust of SAFC Statutory Trust I dated February 16, 2006 (incorporated by reference from Exhibit 4.9 to Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2012)
4.10
  
     
4.114.7
 
4.8
4.9
  
     
4.124.10
 

Index to Financial Statements


Page of
this
Report
10.1
Torchmark Corporation and Affiliates Retired Lives Reserve Agreement, as amended, and Trust (incorporated by reference from Exhibit 10(b) to Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 1991)*  
     
10.210.1
 Capital Accumulation and Bonus Plan of Torchmark Corporation, as amended, (incorporated by reference from Exhibit 10(c) to Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 1988)*
10.3
Torchmark Corporation Supplementary Retirement Plan (incorporated by reference from Exhibit 10(c) to Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 1992)*
10.4
Second Amended and Restated Credit Agreement dated as of May 17, 2016 among Torchmark Corporation, as the Borrower, TMK Re, Ltd., as a Loan Party, Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as Administrative Agent, Swing Line Lender and L/C Administrator and the other lenders party thereto (incorporated by reference from Exhibit 10.1 to Form 8-K dated May 16, 2016)
10.5
Certified Copy of Resolution Regarding Director Retirement Benefit Program (incorporated by reference from Exhibit 10(e) to Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 1999)*
10.6
10.7
The Torchmark Corporation 1987 Stock Incentive Plan (incorporated by reference from Exhibit 10(f) to Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 1998)*
10.8
General Agency Contract between Liberty National Life Insurance Company and First Command Financial Services, Inc., (formerly known as Independent Research Agency For Life Insurance, Inc.) (incorporated by reference from Exhibit 10(i) to Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 1990)
10.9
Amendment to General Agency Contract between First Command Financial Services and Liberty National Life Insurance Company (incorporated by reference from Exhibit 10.1 to Form 10-Q for the First Quarter 2005)
10.10
Form of Deferred Compensation Agreement Between Torchmark Corporation or Subsidiary and Officer at the Level of Vice President or Above Eligible to Participate in the Torchmark Corporation and Affiliates Retired Lives Reserve Agreement and to Retire Prior to December 31, 1986 (incorporated by reference from Exhibit 10(k) to Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 1991)*
10.11
Form of Deferred Compensation Agreement between Torchmark Corporation or Subsidiary and Officer at the Level of Vice President or Above Eligible to Participate in the Torchmark Corporation and Affiliates Retired Lives Reserve Agreement and Not Eligible to Retire Prior to December 31, 1986 (incorporated by reference from Exhibit 10(l) to Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 1991)*
10.12
Form of Deferred Compensation Agreement Between Torchmark Corporation or Subsidiary and Officer at the Level of Vice President or Above Not Eligible to Participate in Torchmark Corporation and Affiliates Retired Lives Reserve Agreement (incorporated by reference from Exhibit 10(j) to Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 1991)*
10.13
Service Agreement, dated as of January 1, 1991, between Torchmark Corporation and Liberty National Life Insurance Company (prototype for agreements between Torchmark Corporation and other principal operating subsidiaries) (incorporated by reference from Exhibit 10(n) to Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 1992)
10.14
The Torchmark Corporation Amended and Restated Pension Plan Generally Effective as of January 1, 2014* (incorporated by reference from Exhibit 10.14 to Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2015)
10.15
The Torchmark Corporation 1998 Stock Incentive Plan (incorporated by reference from Exhibit 10(n) to Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 1998)*

Index to Financial Statements


Page of
this
Report
10.16
The Torchmark Corporation Savings and Investment Plan (amended and restated as of January 1, 2014)* (incorporated by reference from Exhibit 10.16 to From 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2015)
10.17
Torchmark Corporation 2013 Management Incentive Plan effective as of January 1, 2013 (incorporated by reference from Exhibit 10.1 to Form 8-K dated April 30, 2013)*
10.18
Coinsurance and Servicing Agreement between Security Benefit Life Insurance Company and Liberty National Life Insurance Company, effective as of December 31, 1995 (incorporated by reference from Exhibit 10(u) to Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 1995)
10.19
Torchmark Corporation 1996 Non-Employee Director Stock Option Plan (incorporated by reference from Exhibit 10(w) to Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 1996)*
10.20
Torchmark Corporation 1996 Executive Deferred Compensation Stock Option Plan (incorporated by reference from Exhibit 10(x) to Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 1996)*
10.21
Form of Retirement Life Insurance Benefit Agreement ($1,995,000 face amount limit) (incorporated by reference from Exhibit 10(z) to Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2001)*
10.22
Form of Retirement Life Insurance Benefit Agreement ($495,000 face amount limit) (incorporated by reference from Exhibit 10(aa) to Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2001)*
10.23
Payments to Directors*
10.24
Form of Non-Formula Based Director Stock Option Agreement pursuant to Torchmark Corporation 2005 Non-Employee Director Incentive Plan (incorporated by reference from Exhibit 10.2 to Form 10-Q for the First Quarter 2005)*
10.25
Form of Stock Option Agreement pursuant to Torchmark Corporation 2005 Incentive Plan (Section 16(a) (restoration)) (incorporated by reference from Exhibit 10.3 to Form 10-Q for the First Quarter 2005)*
10.26
Form of Stock Option Agreement pursuant to Torchmark Corporation 2005 Incentive Plan (restoration general) (incorporated by reference from Exhibit 10.4 to Form 10-Q for the First Quarter 2005)*
10.27
Form of Stock Option Agreement pursuant to Torchmark Corporation 2005 Incentive Plan (bonus) (incorporated by reference from Exhibit 10.36 to Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2005)*
10.28
Form of Stock Option Agreement pursuant to Torchmark Corporation 2005 Incentive Plan (regular vesting) (incorporated by reference from Exhibit 10.37 to Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2005)*
10.29
Torchmark Corporation 2005 Non-Employee Director Incentive Plan (incorporated by reference from Exhibit 10.1 to Form 8-K dated May 4, 2005)*
10.30
Torchmark Corporation 2005 Stock Incentive Plan (incorporated by reference from Exhibit 10.2 to Form 8-K dated May 4, 2005)*
10.31
Form of Deferred Compensation Stock Option Grant Agreement pursuant to the Torchmark Corporation 2005 Non-Employee Director Incentive Plan (incorporated by reference from Exhibit 10.3 to Form 8-K dated May 4, 2005)*
10.32
Torchmark Corporation Amended and Restated 2005 Incentive Plan (incorporated by reference from Exhibit 10.1 to Form 10-Q for quarter ended March 31, 2006)*
10.33
Torchmark Corporation Amended and Restated 2005 Non-Employee Director Incentive Plan (incorporated by reference from Exhibit 10.2 to Form 10-Q for quarter ended March 31, 2006)*

Index to Financial Statements


Page of
this
Report
10.34
Form of Director Stock Option Issued under Torchmark Corporation Amended and Restated 2005 Non-Employee Director Incentive Plan (incorporated by reference from Exhibit 10.3 to Form 10-Q for quarter ended March 31, 2006)*
10.35
Amendment One to Torchmark Corporation Supplementary Retirement Plan (incorporated by reference from Exhibit 10.4 to Form 10-Q for quarter ended March 31, 2006)*
10.36
Torchmark Corporation Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan (incorporated by reference from Exhibit 10.1 to Form 8-K dated January 25, 2007)*
10.37
Torchmark Corporation 2007 Long-Term Compensation Plan (incorporated by reference from Exhibit 99.1 to Form 8-K dated May 2, 2007)*
10.38
Form of Stock Option Award Agreement under Torchmark Corporation 2007 Long-Term Compensation Plan (incorporated by reference from Exhibit 99.2 to Form 8-K
dated May 2, 2007)*
  
     
10.3910.2
 
Form of Restricted Stock Award (Board grant) under Torchmark Corporation 2007 Long-Term Compensation Plan (incorporated by reference from Exhibit 99.3 to Form 8-K dated
May 2, 2007)*
10.40
Torchmark Corporation Non-Employee Director Compensation Plan, as amended and restated (incorporated by reference from Exhibit 10.1 to Form 8-K dated April 29, 2008)*
10.41
Amendment No. 1 to the Torchmark Corporation Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan (incorporated by reference from Exhibit 10.53 to Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2007)*
10.42
Amendment No. 2 to the Torchmark Corporation Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan (incorporated by reference from Exhibit 10.54 to Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2007)*
10.43
Amendment No. 2 to the Torchmark Corporation Supplementary Retirement Plan (incorporated by reference from Exhibit 10.55 to Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2007)*
10.44
Amendment No. 3 to the Torchmark Corporation Supplementary Retirement Plan (incorporated by reference from Exhibit 10.56 to Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2007)*
10.45
Form of Restricted Stock Award Notice under Torchmark Corporation Non-Employee Director Compensation Plan (incorporated by reference from Exhibit 10.57 to Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2007)*
10.46
Form of Restricted Stock Unit Award Notice under Torchmark Corporation Non-Employee Director Compensation Plan (incorporated by reference from Exhibit 10.58 to Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2007)*
10.47
Form of Restricted Stock Award (Compensation Committee grant) under Torchmark Corporation 2007 Long-Term Compensation Plan (incorporated by reference from Exhibit 10.59 to Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2007)*
10.48
Amendment Four to the Torchmark Corporation Supplementary Retirement Plan (incorporated by reference from Exhibit 10.52 to Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2008)*
10.49
Amendment Three to the Torchmark Corporation Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan (incorporated by reference from Exhibit 10.53 to Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2008)*
10.50
Amendment One to the Torchmark Corporation Restated Deferred Compensation Plan for Directors, Advisory Directors, Directors Emeritus and Officers (incorporated by reference from Exhibit 10.54 to Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2008)*
10.51
Amendment Two to the Torchmark Corporation Restated Deferred Compensation Plan (incorporated by reference from Exhibit 10.55 to Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2008)*  
     

Index to Financial Statements

 
   
Page of
this
Report
10.5210.3
   
     
10.5310.4
 
10.5
10.6
10.7
10.8
10.9
10.10
10.11
10.12
10.13
10.14
  
     
10.5410.15
   
     
10.5510.16
   
     
10.5610.17
 
10.18
10.19
10.20



Page of
this
Report
10.21
10.22
10.23
10.24
10.25
10.26
10.27
10.28
  
     
10.5710.29
   
     
10.5810.30
   
     
10.5910.31
   
     
10.6010.32
 Form of Restricted Stock Award (Executive) under  
     
10.6110.33
 Form of Restricted Stock Award (Special) under   
     
10.6210.34
 Form of Ten year Stock Option under  
     
10.6310.35
 Form of Seven year Stock Option under   
     
10.6410.36
 Form of Performance Share Award under  
     
10.6510.37
 First Amendment
10.66
Form of Stock Option Grant Agreement (Special) pursuant to Torchmark Corporation 2011 Incentive Plan (incorporated by reference from Exhibit 10.1 to Form 8-K dated May10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2013)2016)*
10.67
Amendment to Restricted Stock Award Agreement of February 26, 2009 between Torchmark Corporation and Mark S. McAndrew (incorporated by reference from Exhibit 10.2 to Form 8-K dated May 31, 2013)*
10.68
Amendment to Restricted Stock Award Agreement of February 25, 2010 between Torchmark Corporation and Mark S. McAndrew (incorporated by reference from Exhibit 10.3 to Form 8-K dated May 31, 2013)*
10.71
Amendment to Restricted Stock Award Agreement of April 28, 2011 between Torchmark Corporation and Mark S. McAndrew (incorporated by reference from Exhibit 10.4 to Form 8-K dated May 31, 2013)*  
     

Index to Financial Statements


 
Page of
this
Report

 
Page of
this
Report
10.72
 
Consent and Acknowledgment of Amendment to Non-Qualified Stock Option Grant Agreement dated April 8, 2013 (incorporated by reference from Exhibit 10.1 to Form 8-K dated
April 8, 2013)*
 
10.38
   
   
10.73
 Torchmark Corporation Savings and Investment Plan 2016 Amendment Number One* (incorporated by reference from Exhibit 10.2 to Form 8-K dated May 17, 2016) 
10.74
 Amendment Five to the Torchmark Corporation Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to Form 8-K dated May 5, 2015)* 
 
10.75
 Form of Seven Year Stock Option Grant Agreement under Torchmark Corporation 2011 Incentive Plan, as amended with Non-Compete, Non-Solicit and Confidentiality Provisions* 
 
10.76
 Form of Ten Year Stock Option Grant Agreement under Torchmark Corporation 2011 Incentive Plan, as amended with Non-Compete, Non-Solicit and Confidentiality Provisions* 
10.77
 Form of Performance Share Award Certificate under Torchmark Corporation 2011 Incentive Plan, as amended with Non-Compete, Non-Solicit and Confidentiality Provisions* 
10.78
 Form of Seven Year Stock Option Grant Agreement (Special) under Torchmark Corporation 2011 Incentive Plan, as amended with Non-Compete, Non-Solicit and Confidentiality Provisions* 
10.79
 2016 Amendment to the Torchmark Corporation Savings and Investment Plan (effective December 31, 2016)* 
10.80
 Torchmark Corporation Pension Plan 2016 Amendment to Limit Eligibility (effective December 31, 2016)* 
   
12
 Statement re computation of ratios 
  
   
20
 Proxy Statement for Annual Meeting of Stockholders to be held April 27, 2017** 
 Proxy Statement for Annual Meeting of Stockholders to be held April 27, 2017** 
   
21
 Subsidiaries of the registrant 
 Subsidiaries of the registrant 
   
23
 Consent of Deloitte & Touche LLP 
  
   
24
 Powers of attorney 
  
   
31.1
 Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certification by Gary L. Coleman 
  
   
31.2
 Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certification by Larry M. Hutchison 
  
   
31.3
 Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certification by Frank M. Svoboda 
  
   
32.1
 Section 1350 Certification by Gary L. Coleman, Larry M. Hutchison and Frank M. Svoboda 
  
   
101
 Interactive Data File 
 Interactive Data File 
* Compensatory plan or arrangement.
** To be filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission within 120 days after the fiscal year ended December 31, 2016.2017.

Index to Financial Statements


Exhibit 21. Subsidiaries of the Registrant
 
The following table lists subsidiaries of the registrant which meet the definition of “significant subsidiary” according to Regulation S-X:
 
Company  
State of
Incorporation
    
Name Under Which
Company Does
Business
American Income Life
Insurance Company
  Indiana    
American Income Life
Insurance Company
Globe Life And Accident
Insurance Company
  Nebraska    
Globe Life And Accident
Insurance Company
Liberty National Life
Insurance Company
  Nebraska    
Liberty National Life
Insurance Company
United American
Insurance Company
Nebraska
United American
Insurance Company

While United American Life Insurance Company and Family Heritage Life Insurance Company of America do not qualify as significant subsidiaries in accordance with Regulation S-X, management views these subsidiaries as significant to our operations.
 
All other exhibits required by Regulation S-K are listed as to location in the “Index of documents filed as a part of this report” in this report. Exhibits not referred to have been omitted as inapplicable or not required.

Index to Financial Statements

TORCHMARK CORPORATION
(PARENT COMPANY)
SCHEDULE II. CONDENSED FINANCIAL INFORMATION OF REGISTRANT
CONDENSED BALANCE SHEETS
(AmountsDollar amounts in thousands)
 
December 31,December 31,
2016 20152017 2016
Assets:      
Investments:   
Long-term investments$33,586
 $35,498
$35,562
 $33,586
Short-term investments5,624
 
Total investments41,186
 33,586
Cash
 
1,008
 
Investment in affiliates6,004,429
 5,438,749
7,763,704
 6,004,429
Due from affiliates96,005
 50,765
95,920
 96,005
Taxes receivable from affiliates88,406
 79,599
63,099
 88,406
Other assets119,801
 93,936
135,616
 119,801
Total assets$6,342,227
 $5,698,547
$8,100,533
 $6,342,227
      
Liabilities and shareholders’ equity:      
Liabilities:      
Short-term debt$264,475
 $490,129
$328,067
 $264,475
Long-term debt1,282,891
 893,417
1,281,971
 1,282,891
Due to affiliates
 57,157
8,002
 
Other liabilities228,000
 202,292
251,072
 228,000
Total liabilities1,775,366
 1,642,995
1,869,112
 1,775,366
      
Shareholders’ equity:      
Preferred stock351
 351
351
 351
Common stock127,218
 130,218
124,218
 127,218
Additional paid-in capital840,932
 832,795
858,987
 840,932
Accumulated other comprehensive income577,574
 231,947
1,424,274
 577,574
Retained earnings3,890,798
 3,614,369
4,806,208
 3,890,798
Treasury stock(870,012) (754,128)(982,617) (870,012)
Total shareholders’ equity4,566,861
 4,055,552
6,231,421
 4,566,861
Total liabilities and shareholders’ equity$6,342,227
 $5,698,547
$8,100,533
 $6,342,227
 











See Notes to Condensed Financial Statements and accompanying Report of Independent Registered
Public Accounting Firm.

Index to Financial Statements

TORCHMARK CORPORATION
(PARENT COMPANY)
SCHEDULE II. CONDENSED FINANCIAL INFORMATION OF REGISTRANT (continued)
CONDENSED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
(AmountsDollar amounts in thousands)
 
Year Ended December 31,Year Ended December 31,
2016 2015 20142017 2016 2015
Net investment income$25,352
 $23,715
 $22,259
$26,130
 $25,352
 $23,715
Realized investment gains (losses)
 8
 4,767
(2,791) 
 8
Total revenue25,352
 23,723
 27,026
23,339
 25,352
 23,723
          
General operating expenses52,613
 54,100
 53,235
61,447
 52,613
 54,100
Reimbursements from affiliates(54,288) (53,436) (53,040)(52,776) (54,288) (53,436)
Interest expense86,853
 79,677
 79,366
88,474
 86,853
 79,677
Total expenses85,178
 80,341
 79,561
97,145
 85,178
 80,341
          
Operating income (loss) before income taxes and equity in earnings of affiliates(59,826) (56,618) (52,535)(73,806) (59,826) (56,618)
Income taxes23,479
 15,542
 13,335
(9,874) 23,479
 15,542
Net operating loss before equity in earnings of affiliates(36,347) (41,076) (39,200)(83,680) (36,347) (41,076)
Equity in earnings of affiliates586,126
 568,176
 582,139
1,538,174
 586,126
 568,176
Net income549,779
 527,100
 542,939
1,454,494
 549,779
 527,100
          
Other comprehensive income (loss):          
Attributable to Parent Company(11,314) (3,539) (28,680)(8,409) (11,314) (3,539)
Attributable to affiliates356,941
 (761,966) 815,151
602,709
 356,941
 (761,966)
Comprehensive income (loss)$895,406
 $(238,405) $1,329,410
$2,048,794
 $895,406
 $(238,405)
 






















See Notes to Condensed Financial Statements and accompanying Report of Independent Registered
Public Accounting Firm.

Index to Financial Statements

TORCHMARK CORPORATION
(PARENT COMPANY)
SCHEDULE II. CONDENSED FINANCIAL INFORMATION OF REGISTRANT—(continued)
CONDENSED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(AmountsDollar amounts in thousands)
 
Year Ended December 31,Year Ended December 31,
2016 2015 20142017 2016 2015
Net income$549,779
 $527,100
 $542,939
$1,454,494
 $549,779
 $527,100
Equity in earnings of affiliates(586,126) (568,176) (582,139)(1,538,174) (586,126) (568,176)
Cash dividends from subsidiaries437,566
 466,416
 478,840
453,904
 437,566
 466,416
Other, net(6,718) 20,371
 17,842
52,957
 (6,718) 20,371
Cash provided from operations394,501
 445,711
 457,482
423,181
 394,501
 445,711
          
Cash provided from (used for) investing activities:          
Disposition of investments
 
 5,064
Net decrease (increase) in short-term investments(3,466) 17,338
 2,729
(5,624) (3,466) 17,338
Investment in subsidiaries(35,000) (2) 
(31,000) (35,000) (2)
Additions to properties(21,965) (468) 
(7,230) (21,965) (468)
Loaned money to affiliates(363,056) (282,508) (81,000)(180,000) (363,056) (282,508)
Repayments from affiliates318,056
 282,508
 81,000
180,000
 318,056
 282,508
Cash provided from (used for) investing activities(105,431) 16,868
 7,793
(43,854) (105,431) 16,868
          
Cash provided from (used for) financing activities:          
Repayment of debt(250,000) 
 
(126,875) (250,000) 
Proceeds from issuance of debt400,000
 
 
125,000
 400,000
 
Payment for debt issuance costs(9,638) 
 
(1,661) (9,638) 
Net issuance (repayment) of commercial paper22,224
 1,978
 9,328
61,092
 22,224
 1,978
Issuance of stock61,329
 35,958
 56,294
61,215
 61,329
 35,958
Acquisitions of treasury stock(404,784) (418,526) (449,309)(412,989) (404,784) (418,526)
Borrowed money from affiliate60,000
 15,000
 168,000
278,500
 60,000
 15,000
Repayments to affiliates(78,000) (15,000) (168,000)(270,500) (78,000) (15,000)
Excess tax benefit on stock option exercises(1)

 8,180
 6,688
Excess tax benefit on stock option exercises
 
 8,180
Payment of dividends(90,201) (90,169) (88,276)(92,101) (90,201) (90,169)
Cash provided from (used for) financing activities(289,070) (462,579) (465,275)(378,319) (289,070) (462,579)
          
Net increase (decrease) in cash
 
 
1,008
 
 
Cash balance at beginning of period
 
 

 
 
Cash balance at end of period$
 $
 $
$1,008
 $
 $
 
(1)
Certain current year amounts were prospectively adjusted to give effect to the adoption of ASU 2016-09 related to excess tax benefits from stock compensation as described in Note 1—Significant Accounting Policiesunder "Accounting Pronouncements Adopted in the Current Year."







See Notes to Condensed Financial Statements and accompanying Report of Independent Registered
Public Accounting Firm.

Index to Financial Statements

TORCHMARK CORPORATION
(PARENT COMPANY)
SCHEDULE II. CONDENSED FINANCIAL INFORMATION OF REGISTRANT (continued)
NOTES TO CONDENSED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(AmountsDollar amounts in thousands)
 
Note A—Dividends from Subsidiaries
 
Cash dividends paid to Torchmark from the subsidiaries were as follows:
 Year Ended December 31,
 2016 2015 2014
Dividends from subsidiaries$437,566
 $466,416
 $478,840
 Year Ended December 31,
 2017 2016 2015
Dividends from subsidiaries$453,904
 $437,566
 $466,416
 

Note B—Supplemental Disclosures of Cash Flow Information
 
The following table summarizes noncash transactions, which are not reflected on the Condensed Statements of Cash Flows:
Year Ended December 31,Year Ended December 31,
2016 2015 20142017 2016 2015
Stock-based compensation not involving cash$26,326
 $28,664
 $32,203
$37,034
 $26,326
 $28,664
Borrowed money from affiliate
 56,503
 

 
 56,503
Investment in subsidiaries
 39,206
 
317,027
 
 39,206
Purchase of agent debit balances
 17,297
 

 
 17,297

 
The following table summarizes certain amounts paid (received) during the period:
Year Ended December 31,Year Ended December 31,
2016 2015 20142017 2016 2015
Interest paid$84,952
 $77,920
 $77,663
$86,606
 $84,952
 $77,920
Income taxes received(20,838) (22,009) (25,581)
Income taxes paid (received)(19,961) (20,838) (22,009)
 

Note C—Preferred Stock
 
As of December 31, 2016,2017, Torchmark had 351 thousand shares of Cumulative Preferred Stock, Series A, issued and outstanding, of which 280 thousand shares were 6.50% Cumulative Preferred Stock, Series A, and 71 thousand shares were 7.15% Cumulative Preferred Stock, Series A (collectively, the “Series A Preferred Stock”). All issued and outstanding shares of Series A Preferred Stock were held by wholly-owned insurance subsidiaries. In the event of liquidation, the holders of the Series A Preferred Stock at the time outstanding would be entitled to receive a liquidating distribution out of the assets legally available to stockholders in the amount of $1 thousand per share or $351 million in the aggregate, plus any accrued and unpaid dividends, before any distribution is made to holders of Torchmark common stock. Holders of Series A Preferred Stock do not have any voting rights nor have rights to convert such shares into shares of any other class of Torchmark capital stock.
 
 








See accompanying Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm.

Index to Financial Statements

TORCHMARK CORPORATION
SCHEDULE IV. REINSURANCE (CONSOLIDATED)
(Dollar Amounts in thousands)
 
 Gross
Amount
 
Ceded
to Other
Companies
(1)
 Assumed
from Other
Companies
 Net
Amount
 Percentage
of Amount
Assumed
to Net
 Gross
Amount
 
Ceded
to Other
Companies
(1)
 Assumed
from Other
Companies
 Net
Amount
 Percentage
of Amount
Assumed
to Net
For the Year Ended December 31, 2017          
Life insurance in force $179,902,605
 $705,152
 $3,211,423
 $182,408,876
 1.8
Premiums:(2)
 
 
 
   
Life insurance $2,272,038
 $4,437
 $21,912
 $2,289,513
 1.0
Health insurance 980,082
 3,709
 
 976,373
 
Total premium $3,252,120
 $8,146
 $21,912
 $3,265,886
 0.7
For the Year Ended December 31, 2016                    
Life insurance in force $174,314,897
 $725,867
 $3,352,113
 $176,941,143
 1.9 $174,314,897
 $725,867
 $3,352,113
 $176,941,143
 1.9
Premiums:(2)
 
 
 
            
Life insurance $2,152,698
 $4,507
 $22,915
 $2,171,106
 1.1 $2,152,698
 $4,507
 $22,915
 $2,171,106
 1.1
Health insurance 951,137
 3,474
 
 947,663
  951,137
 3,474
 
 947,663
 
Total premium $3,103,835
 $7,981
 $22,915
 $3,118,769
 0.7 $3,103,835
 $7,981
 $22,915
 $3,118,769
 0.7
For the Year Ended December 31, 2015                    
Life insurance in force $167,677,206
 $729,739
 $3,498,826
 $170,446,293
 2.1 $167,677,206
 $729,739
 $3,498,826
 $170,446,293
 2.1
Premiums:(2)
                  
Life insurance $2,034,373
 $4,484
 $24,007
 $2,053,896
 1.2 $2,034,373
 $4,484
 $24,007
 $2,053,896
 1.2
Health insurance 928,659
 3,139
 
 925,520
  928,659
 3,139
 
 925,520
 
Total premium $2,963,032
 $7,623
 $24,007
 $2,979,416
 0.8 $2,963,032
 $7,623
 $24,007
 $2,979,416
 0.8
For the Year Ended December 31, 2014          
Life insurance in force $160,455,963
 $795,192
 $3,658,511
 $163,319,282
 2.2
Premiums:(2)
         
Life insurance $1,924,605
 $4,614
 $25,774
 $1,945,765
 1.3
Health insurance 872,391
 2,951
 
 869,440
 
Total premium $2,796,996
 $7,565
 $25,774
 $2,815,205
 0.9
 
(1)No amounts have been netted against ceded premium.
(2)Excludes policy charges of $17.0 million, $18.3 million, $19.3 million, and $20.9$19.3 million in each of the years 2017, 2016, 2015, and 2014,2015, respectively.



















See accompanying Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm.

Index to Financial Statements

SIGNATURES
 
Pursuant to the requirements of Section 12 or 15(d) of the Securities Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
 
 
TORCHMARK CORPORATION
 
    
 By:
/s/    GARY L. COLEMAN        
 
  Gary L. Coleman 
  Co-Chairman and Chief Executive Officer and Director 
    
 By:
/s/    LARRY M. HUTCHISON        
 
  Larry M. Hutchison 
  Co-Chairman and Chief Executive Officer and Director 
    
 By:
/s/    FRANK M. SVOBODA        
 
  
Frank M. Svoboda, Executive Vice President
and Chief Financial Officer
(Principal Accounting Officer)
 
 
Date: February 27, 201726, 2018
 
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.
 
By:
/s/    CHARLESCHARLES E. ADAIR  ADAIR  *        
 By:/s/    STEVEN P. JOHNSON  *        
 Charles E. Adair  Steven P. Johnson
 Director  Director
     
By:
/S/    MARILYN A. ALEXANDER  s/    LINDA L. ADDISON  *        
 By:
/s/    LLOYDLLOYD W. NEWTON  NEWTON  *        
 Marilyn A. AlexanderLinda L. Addison  Lloyd W. Newton
 Director  Director
     
By:
/S/    DAVID L. BOREN  S/    MARILYN A. ALEXANDER  *        
 By:
/s/    DARRENDARREN M. REBELEZ  REBELEZ  *        
 David L. BorenMarilyn A. Alexander  Darren M. Rebelez
 Director  Director
     
By:
/s/    JANE M. BUCHAN  S/    CHERYL D. ALSTON  *        
 By:
/s/    LAMARLAMAR C. SMITH  SMITH  *        
 Jane M. BuchanCheryl D. Alston  Lamar C. Smith
 Director  Director
     
By:
/s/    ROBERT W. INGRAM  S/    DAVID L. BOREN  *        
 By:
/s/    PAUL J. ZUCCONI  MARY E. THIGPEN  *        
 Robert W. IngramDavid L. BorenMary E. Thigpen
DirectorDirector
By:/s/    JANE M. BUCHAN  *        By:/s/    PAUL J. ZUCCONI  *        
Jane M. Buchan  Paul J. Zucconi
 Director  Director
By:/s/    ROBERT W. INGRAM  *        
Robert W. Ingram
Director


Date: February 27, 201726, 2018 
   
*By:  
/s/    FRANK M. SVOBODA        
 
 Frank M. Svoboda 
 Attorney-in-fact 

129
TMK 2017 FORM 10-K