UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
___________
FORM 10-K
X Annual Report Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
For the fiscal year ended December 31, 20102013
___ Transition Report Pursuant to Section 13 of 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 For the transition period from ___ to ___
Commission File No. 000-19301
Communication Intelligence Corporation
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
Delaware (State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization) | 94-2790442 (I.R.S. Employer Identification No.) |
275 Shoreline Drive, Suite 500 Redwood Shores, California (Address of principal executive offices) | | 94065 (Zip Code) |
Registrant’s telephone number, including area code: 650-802-7888
Securities registered under Section 12(b) of the Act: None
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act: Common Stock, $0.01 par value
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act.
Yes[ ] No[ X ]Yes No
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act.
Yes[ ] No[ X ]Yes No
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.
Yes [ X ] No [ ]
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes No
Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrant's knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference into Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K. [ X ]
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the act (check one): Large accelerated filer [ ] Accelerated filer [ ] Non-accelerated filer [ ] Smaller reporting company [ X ]
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Act)
Yes [ ] No [ X ]
The aggregate market value of the voting stock (Common Stock) held by non-affiliates of the registrant as of June 30, 20102013, was approximately $8,432,036$6,958,686 based on the closing sale price of $0.07$0.050 on such date, as reported by the Over-the-Counter Bulletin Board.OTC Markets Group Inc. The number of shares of Common Stock outstanding as of the close of business on March 29, 201130, 2014, was 191,489,901.232,559,528.
DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFFERENCE
None.
COMMUNICATION INTELLIGENCE CORPORATION
TABLE OF CONTENTS
| | Page |
PART I | 3 |
Item 1. Business | 3 |
Item 1A. Risk Factors | 7 |
Item 1B. Unresolved Staff Comments | 7 |
Item 2. Properties | 7 |
Item 3. Legal Proceedings | 7 |
Item 4. Mine Safety Disclosures | 7 |
PART II | 7 |
| Item 5. Market For Registrant's Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities | 87
|
Item 6. Selected Financial Data | 8 |
Item 7. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations | 8 |
Item 7A. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk | 1716 |
Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data | 1716 |
Item 9. Changes in and Disagreements With Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure | 1716
|
Item 9A. Controls and Procedures | 1716 |
Item 9B. Other Information | 18 |
PART III | 1918 |
Item 10. Directors, and Executive Officers and Corporate Governance | 1918 |
Item 11. Executive Compensation | 2221 |
| Item 12. Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters | 2523
|
Item 13. Certain Relationships and Related Transactions and Director Independence | 28 |
Item 14. Principal Accountant Fees and Services | 3831 |
PART IV | 31 |
Item 15. Exhibits, Financial Statement Schedules | 31 |
___________
CIC’s logo, Handwriter®Handwriter®, Jot®Jot®, iSign®iSign®, InkSnap®InkSnap®, InkTools® SIGVIEW®InkTools® SIGVIEW®, Sign-On®Sign-On®, Sign-it®Sign-it®, WordComplete®WordComplete®, INKshrINK®INKshrINK®, SigCheck®SigCheck®, SignatureOne®SignatureOne®, Ceremony®Ceremony® and The Power To Sign Online®Online® are registered trademarks of the Company. KnowledgeMatchä is a trademark of the Company. Applications for registration of various trademarks are pending in the United States, Europe and Asia. The Company intends to register its trademarks generally in those jurisdictions where significant marketing of its products will be undertaken in the foreseeable future.
Note Regarding Forward Looking Statements
Certain statements contained in this Annual Report on Form 10-K, including without limitation, statements containing the words “believes”, “anticipates”, “hopes”, “intends”, “expects”, and other words of similar import, constitute “forward looking” statements within the meaning of the Private Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Such statements involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors that may cause actual events to differ materially from expectations. Such factors include the following: (1) technological, engineering, quality control or other circumstances which could delay the sale or shipment of products; (2) economic, business, market and competitive conditions in the software industry and technological innovations which could affect the Company’s business; (3) the Company’s ability to protect its trade secrets or other proprietary rights, operate without infringing upon the proprietary rights of others or prevent others from infringing on the proprietary rights of the Company; and (4) general economic and business conditions and the availability of sufficient financing.
PART I
Item 1. Business
Unless otherwise stated all amounts in Part I through Part IV are stated in thousands (“000s”).
General
Communication Intelligence Corporation (the “Company” or “CIC”) was incorporated in Delaware in October 1986. CIC is a leading supplier of electronic signature products and the recognized leader in biometric signature verification. CIC enables companies to achieve truly paperless workflow in their electronic business processes by providing multiple signature technologies across virtually all applications. CIC’s solutions are available both in software-as-a-service (“SaaS”) and on-premise delivery models and afford “straight-through-processing,” which can increase customer revenue by enhancing user experience and can also reduce costs through paperless and virtually error-free electronic transactions that can be completed significantly faster than paper-based procedures. To date, the Company primarily has delivered biometric and electronic signature solutions to channel partners and end-user customers in the financial services industry. The Company is headquartered in Redwood Shores, California.
For the year ended December 31, 20102013, total revenue was $851,$1,418, a decrease of $1,085,$960, or 56%40%, compared to total revenue of $1,936$2,378 in the prior year. For the year ended December 31, 2010,2013, software product revenue was $197,$728, a decrease of $988,$1,001, or 83%58%, compared to product revenue of $1,185$1,729 in the prior year. Maintenance revenue for the year ended December 31, 20102013, was $654, a decrease$690, an increase of $97,$41, or 13%6%, compared to maintenance revenue of $751$649 in the prior year. The Company believes the decrease in software product revenue is primarily dueattributable to the slow and moderate increase in IT spending by large financial service companies (historically, CIC’s primary target market)delays in the aftermathavailability of new products during the first three quarters of the recent financial crisis and recession.year. The decreaseincrease in maintenance revenue is primarily due to due to lower maintenance revenue from four customers that signed multi year contracts at a reduced annual rate.an increase in the sale of enterprise licenses during 2012.
For the year ended December 31, 2010,2013, the net loss attributable to common stockholders was $4,553,$8,099, an increase of $1,353, or 20%, compared to $10,827$6,746 in the prior year. For the year ended December 31, 2010,2013, non-cash charges attributable to interest expense, deferred financing and loan discount amortization, related to the Company’sloss on extinguishment of debt and loss on debt extinguishmentthe accretion of the beneficial conversion feature was $2,039,$1,793, a decrease of $653, or 27% compared to $2,862$2,446 in the prior year. There was a gain of $3,136 in$103 on the derivative liability value in 2010,for the year ended December 31, 2013, compared to a lossgain of $5,136$211 in the prior year. For the year ended December 31, 2010,2013, operating expenses, including amortization of software development costs, were $6,105,$5,715, an increase of $1,399,$283, or 30%5%, compared to operating expenses of $4,706$5,432 for the prior year. The increase in operating expense resulted primarily from a charge of $1,009 relatedincreases in outside engineering expense and stock option compensation compared to the accelerated amortization of certain capitalized software development costs, as well as general administrative costs related to management changes in the latter half of 2010.prior year.
Core Technologies
The Company's core technologies can be referred to as "transaction-enabling” and “business process work flow” technologies. These technologies include various forms of electronic signature technologies,methods, such as handwritten, biometric, click-to-sign and others, as well as technologies related to signature verification, authentication, cryptography and the logging of audit trails to showprove signers’ intent. These technologies enable the appending of secure, legal and regulatory compliant electronic transactions completed throughsignatures coupled with an enhanced customeruser experience, all at a fraction of the time and cost required by traditional, paper-based processes.processes for signature capture.
Products
The Company’s enterprise-class SignatureOne®SignatureOne® and iSign® suite of electronic signature solutions enables businesses to implement truly paperless, electronic signature-driven business processes. Many applications provide electronic forms and allow users to fill in information, but most of these applications still require users to print out a paper copy for ana handwritten, ink signature. Solutions powered by CIC products allow legally binding electronic signatures to be added to digital documents, eliminating the need for paper copies. This allows users to reduce transaction times and processing costs and to increase theirthe time available for revenue generating activities.
The SignatureOne®SignatureOne® and iSign® suite of products includes the following:
SignatureOne® Ceremony® Server™SignatureOne® Ceremony® Server | The SignatureOne® Ceremony® Server™SignatureOne® Ceremony® Server (“Ceremony Server”) isprovides a J2EE server product that provides the capability to definehighly secure, scalable, patent-protected and manage anstreamlined electronic signature process within a service oriented architecturesolution. Its flexible, easy-to-configure and thatagile workflow can be deployed both on-premiserapidly integrated via standard Web services to become an ultimate and oncost efficient endpoint in true straight-through processing (the complete removal of paper from business processes) and to facilitate end-to-end management of multi-party approvals for PDF and XHTML documents. The Ceremony Server contains CIC’s core esignature engine and signature ceremony management tools, and can be seamlessly integrated with numerous ancillary products. Its key features include: •Consent/disclosure management – integral part of audit record; easily reproducible in the event of a SaaS basis. Application program interfaces, web services, notification services, reporting,dispute; •Configurable document presentment – signatory receipt, access and viewing of document tracked in audit trail; •Multi-party ceremonies – complex processes, simplified; allows for dynamic, multi-channel workflow changes, including remote, face-to-face and mobile scenarios; •Supports complex business rules and dynamic user behaviors; •Configurable branding and workflow; •Flexible tracking and flexible XML schema enable virtually seamless integration with most electronic content management, enterprise resource planning or other workflow, content managementreporting – includes event notification service •Extensive audit trail – embedded in individual document in a tamper evident digital seal; and storage/repository systems •Support for the automation of any document process that requires signatures.multiple signature methods – click-to-sign; biometric; and others. |
SignatureOne®iSign® Console™ | The SignatureOne®iSign® Console™ (“Console”) productleverages the Ceremony Server’s core signature engine and is ideal for organizations looking for a server based offering that leverages CIC’s patented Ceremony® process andstandalone electronic signature solution. Through its intuitive graphical interface, the Console allows users to upload documents for signature, select signers and signature methods, and manage and control the set upenforce document workflow for routing, reviewing, signing and delivery of documents for electronic signatures in an easy and flexible way and with a strong audit trail for non-repudiation.notifications. The Console works independently from advanced document management systemsoffers a secure and represents an intuitive front-end solution for small-to-medium enterprises to rapidly integrate electronic signaturesthat requires no integration and is available on-premise or in the business processes. Its principal features include the ability to upload multiple documents for review and/or execution, to select an electronic signature method, such as click-to-sign or biometric, choose signature field placement, manage the signature process via invites and preset email reminders and secure the process with passcodes.cloud. |
Sign-it®iSign® Suite | Sign-it®The growing suite of iSign® products and service includes iSign® Mobile (for signing on iOS and Android mobile devices), iSign® Forms (for integrated use of templates and forms), and iSign® Live (CIC’s patent-pending co-browsing solution for simultaneous browsing signature ceremonies).
|
Sign-it® | Sign-it® is a family of desktop software products that enable the real-time capture of electronic and digital signatures, as well as their verification and binding within a standard set of applications, including Adobe Acrobat and Microsoft Word, web basedweb-based applications using HTML, XML and XHTML, and custom applications for .NET, C# and similar development environments for the enterprise market. The Sign-it®Sign-it® family of products combines the strengths of biometrics, and other forms of electronic signatures, with cryptography in a patented process that insures the creation of documents containing legally compliant electronic signatures. These signatures have the same legal standing as a traditional so-called wet signature on paper and are created pursuant to the Electronic Signature in National and Global Commerce Act, as well as other related legislation and regulations. With Sign-it®Sign-it® products, organizations wishing to process electronic forms, requiring varying levels of security, can reduce the cost and other inefficiencies inherent with paper documents by adding electronic signature technologies to their workflow solutions. |
SignatureOne Profile Server™iSign® Toolkits | The SignatureOne Profile Server™ (“Profile Server”) is a server compliment to CIC's Sign-It® software and provides server-based enterprise administration and authentication of electronic signatures, as well as maintenance of signature transaction logs for electronically signed documents. The SignatureOne® architecture implements a common process and methodology that provides a uniform program interface for multiple signature methods and multiple capture devices, simplifying enterprise wide integration of business process automation tasks requiring electronic signatures. |
iSign® | iSign® is aiSign® suite of application development tools for electronic signature capture, encryption and verification in custom applications and web-based processes. iSign®processes captures and analyzes the image, speed, stroke sequence and acceleration of a person's handwritten electronic signature and can providesignature. This capability offers an effective and inexpensive solution for immediate authentication of handwritten
|
iSign® (continued) | handwritten signatures. iSign®iSign® toolkits also storesstore certain forensic elements of an electronic signature for use in determining whether a person’s electronic signature is legally valid. iSign® includesThey also include software libraries for industry standard encryption and hashing to protect the sensitive nature oft a user’s signature, as well as the data captured in the Ceremony®Ceremony® process. iSign® is used internally by the Company as an underlying technology for its SignatureOne® and Sign-it® suite of products. |
Products and upgrades that were introduced and first shippeddeployed in 20102013 include the following:
iSign® v4.3.0.1 |
iSign® v4.3.1.2 |
iSign® v4.3.1.3 |
iSign® v4.4 |
SignatureOne® Sign-it® XF v2.1 JavaCeremony® Server | v3.4 |
SignatureOne® Ceremony® Server v1.13 | v3.5 |
SignatureOne® Ceremony® Server v1.2.1 | v4.0 |
SignatureOne® Ceremony® Server v1.2.2 | v4.1 |
SignatureOne® Ceremony® Server v1.4 | v4.1.1 |
SignatureOne® Ceremony® Server v1.5 | v4.1.2 |
SignatureOne® Ceremony® Server v1.5.1 | v4.1.3 |
SignatureOne® Sign-it® v7.1 for Acrobat®Ceremony® Server | v4.1.4 |
SignatureOne® Sign-it® v7.11 for Acrobat®Ceremony® Server | v4.1.5 |
SignatureOne® Sign-it® v7.12 for Acrobat®Ceremony® Server | v4.1.6 |
SignatureOne® Sign-it® v7.2 for Acrobat®Ceremony® Server | v4.1.7 |
| SignatureOne® Ceremony® Server | v4.1.8 |
| SignatureOne® Ceremony® Server | v4.2 |
| SignatureOne® Ceremony® Server | v4.3 |
| SignatureOne® Ceremony® Server | v4.3.1 |
Sign-it® Viewer v2.2 for Acrobat® | v8.0.1 |
| Sign-it® for Acrobat® | v9.0 |
Copyrights, Patents and Trademarks
The Company relies on a combination of patents, copyrights, trademarks, trade secrets and contractual provisions to protect its software offerings and technologies. The Company has a policy of requiring its employees and contractors to respectcommit to the protection of proprietary information through written agreements. The Company also has a policy of requiring prospective business partners to enter into non-disclosure agreements before disclosure of any of its proprietary information.
Over the years, the Company has developed and patented major elements of its software offerings and technologies. In addition, in October 2000 the Company acquired from PenOp, Inc. and its subsidiary, a significant patent portfolio relevant to the markets in which the Company sells its products. The Company’s patents and the years in which they each expire are as follows:
| | Patent No. | Expiration | |
| | 5544255 | 2013 | |
| | 5647017 | 2014 | |
| | 5818955 | 2015 | |
| | 5933514 | 2016 | |
| | 6064751 | 2017 | |
| | 6091835 | 2017 | |
| | 6212295 | 2018 | |
| | 6381344 | 2019 | |
| | 6487310 | 2019 | |
| | Patent No. | Expiration | |
| | 5647017 | 2014 | |
| | 5818955 | 2015 | |
| | 5933514 | 2016 | |
| | 6064751 | 2017 | |
| | 6091835 | 2017 | |
| | 6212295 | 2018 | |
| | 6381344 | 2019 | |
| | 6487310 | 2019 | |
The Company believes that these patents provide a competitive advantage in the electronic signature and biometric signature verification markets. The Company believes the technologies covered by the patents are unique and allow it to produce superior products. The Company also believes these patents are broad in their coverage.unique. The technologies go beyond the simple handwritten signature and include measuring electronically the manner in which a person signs to ensure tamper resistance and security of the resultant documents, and the use of other systems for identifying an individual and using that information to close avalidate the signer and the transaction. The Company believes that the patents are sufficiently broad in coverage that products with substantially similar functionality would infringe its patents.
The Company has an extensive list of registered and unregistered trademarks and applications therefore in the United States and other countries. The Company generally intends to register its trademarks generally in those jurisdictions where significant marketing of its products will be undertaken in the foreseeable future.
Material Customers
Historically, the Company’s revenue has been derived from hundreds of customers, however,but a significant percentage of the revenue has been attributable to a limited number of customers. One customer, Wells Fargo Bank, NA,Five customers, as described in Note 2 to the Consolidated Financial statements, accounted for 20%16%, 15%, 12%, 10%and 10%, respectively, of total revenue for the year ended December 31, 2010.2013.
Seasonality of Business
The Company believes that the sale of its products areis not subject to seasonal fluctuations.
Backlog
Backlog was approximately $1,097$564 and $1,325$818 at December 31, 20102013 and 2009,2012, respectively, representing advanced payments on product and service maintenance agreements. In 2009, the Company negotiated several long term maintenance agreements of which the remaining balance of approximately $650$74 will be recognized over one to threetwo years. The remaining backlog is expected to be recognized over the next twelve months.
Competition
The Company faces competition at different levels.levels both domestically and internationally. The technology-neutral nature of the laws and regulations related to what constitutes an “electronic signature” and CIC’s multi-modal enterprise-wide suite of products causes the Company to compete with different companies depending upon the specific type of electronic signature sought by a prospective customer. Currently, CIC’s primary competition is Silanis and DocuSign when the application is click-wrap, voice, fingerprint, password, andfor basic click-to-sign technology.electronic signatures includes Silanis, Adobe EchoSign and/or DocuSign. Principal competition for handwritten biometric signatures includes SoftPro, Wondernet and low-end tabletsignature pad vendors. The Company believes it has a competitive advantage by offering solutions with a multitudevariety of different electronic signature methods and that enable users to sign virtually any document format, in any software environment, and on any hardware platform.
The Company believes that it has a competitive advantage,differentiation from its competitors and enjoys certain advantages, including its patent portfolio. However, there can be no assurance that competitors, including some with greater financial or other resources, will not succeed in developing products or technologies that are more effective, easier to use or less expensive than our products or technologies and that could render our products or technologies obsolete or non-competitive.
Employees
As of December 31, 2010,2013, the Company employed 20seventeen full-time employees.employees and seven independent contractors. The Company has established long-standing strategic relationships that allow it to rapidly access product development and deployment capabilities that could be required to address most customer requirements. None of the Company’s employees are party to any collective bargaining agreements. We believe our employee relations are good.
Geographic Areas
For the years ended December 31, 20102013 and 2009,2012, sales in the United States as a percentage of total sales were 93%98% and 96%100%, respectively. At December 31, 20102013 and 2009, long lived2012, long-lived assets located in the United States were $3,879$1,336 and $2,870,$1,712, respectively. There were no long-lived assets located elsewhere as of December 31, 20102013 and 2009.2012.
Segments
The Company reports its financial results in one segment.
Available Information
Our web site is located at www.cic.com. The information on or accessible through our web site is not part of this Annual Report on Form 10-K. Our Annual Reports on Form 10-K, Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q, Current Reports on Form 8-K and amendments to such reports are available, free of charge, on our web site as soon as reasonably practicable after we electronically file with or furnish such material to the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”). Furthermore, a copy of this Annual Report on Form 10-K and other reports filed by CIC with the SEC may be read and copied by the public at the SEC’s Public Reference Room at 100 F Street, NE, Washington, D.C. 20549 on official business days during the hours of 10 a.m. and 3 p.m. Information on the operation of the Public Reference Room can be obtained by calling the SEC at 1-800-SEC-0330. The SEC maintains an internet site that contains reports, proxy and information statements and other information regarding issuers, including CIC, that file electronically with the SEC at www.sec.gov.
Item 1A.1A Risk Factors
Not applicable.
Item 1B. Unresolved Staff Comments
None.
Item 2. Properties
The Company leases its principal facilities, consisting of approximately 9,600 square feet, in Redwood Shores, California, pursuant to a lease that expires in 2016.
Item 3. Legal Proceedings
None.
Item 4. Mine Safety Disclosures
None.
PART II
| Item 5. | Market for Registrant's Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities |
Item 5. Market for Registrant's Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity
Securities
The Company’s Common Stock is quoted on OTC Markets Group Inc.’s OTCQB quotation system under the trading symbol CICI. Trading activity for the Company’s Common Stock can be viewed at www.otcmarkets.com. Prior to March 1, 2010, the Company’s Common Stock was also quoted on the Over-the-Counter Bulletin Board under the trading symbol CICI.OB. The following table sets forth the high and low sale prices of the Common Stock for the periods noted.
| | | Sale Price Per Share |
| Year | Period | High | Low |
| | | | |
| 2009 | First Quarter | $ 0.12 | $ 0.04 |
| | Second Quarter | $ 0.11 | $ 0.05 |
| | Third Quarter | $ 0.18 | $ 0.07 |
| | Fourth Quarter | $ 0.23 | $ 0.10 |
| 2010 | First Quarter | $ 0.14 | $ 0.08 |
| | Second Quarter | $ 0.14 | $ 0.05 |
| | Third Quarter | $ 0.08 | $ 0.03 |
| | Fourth Quarter | $ 0.06 | $ 0.03 |
| | | Sale Price Per Share |
| Year | Period | High | Low |
| | | | |
| 2012 | First Quarter | $ 0.14 | $ 0.03 |
| | Second Quarter | $ 0.08 | $ 0.03 |
| | Third Quarter | $ 0.06 | $ 0.03 |
| | Fourth Quarter | $ 0.05 | $ 0.03 |
| 2013 | First Quarter | $ 0.05 | $ 0.03 |
| | Second Quarter | $ 0.04 | $ 0.03 |
| | Third Quarter | $ 0.04 | $ 0.03 |
| | Fourth Quarter | $ 0.04 | $ 0.02 |
Holders
As of March 25, 201120, 2014 there were approximately 847792 holders of record of our Common Stock.
Dividends
To date, the Company has not paid any dividends on its Common Stock and does not anticipate paying any such dividends in the foreseeable future. The declaration and payment of dividends on the Common Stock is at the discretion of the Board of Directors and will depend on, among other things, the Company's operating results, financial condition, capital requirements, contractual restrictions or such other factors as the Board of Directors may deem relevant.
Recent Sales of Unregistered Securities
All securities sold during 20102013 by the Company were either previously reported on a Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q or in a Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC.
Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities
None.
Item 6. Selected Financial Data
Not applicable.
Item 7. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
The following discussion and analysis should be read in conjunction with our financial statements and related notes appearing elsewhere in this Form 10-K. The following discussion relating to projected growth and future results and events constitutes forward-looking statements. Actual results in future periods may differ materially from the forward-looking statements due to a number of risks and uncertainties. We cannot guarantee future results, levels of activity, performance or achievements. Except as otherwise required under applicable law, we disclaim any obligation to revise or update forward-looking statements to reflect events or circumstances after the date of such statements or to reflect the occurrence of anticipated or unanticipated events.
Unless otherwise stated herein, all figures in this Item 7, other than price per share data, are stated in thousands (“000s”).
Overview and Recent Developments
The Company is a leading supplier of electronic signature solutions for business process automation and is the recognized leader in biometric signature verification technology. Our products enable companies to achieve secure paperless business transactions with multiple signature technologies, across virtually all applications and hardware platforms, andplatforms. If the Company’s processes are followed, the result is a signature that areis legally binding and compliant
with applicable laws and regulations and that can provide a higher level of security than paper-based processes. The Company has been a leading supplier of electronic signature solutions within the financial services industryand insurance industries and has delivered significant expense reduction by enabling complete document and workflow automation.automation through the use of electronic signatures and the resulting reduction mail, scanning, filing and other costs related to the use of paper.
The Company was incorporated in Delaware in October 1986. Except for the year ended December 31, 2004, in each year since its inception the Company has incurred losses. For the two-year period ended December 31, 2010,2013, net losses attributable to common stockholders aggregated approximately $15,380,$14,845, and, at December 31, 2010,2013, the Company's accumulated deficit was approximately $107,337.$119,184.
For the year ended December 31, 2010,2013, total revenue was $851,$1,418, a decrease of $1,085,$960, or 56%40%, compared to total revenue of $1,936$2,378 in the prior year. The Company believes this declinedecrease in revenue is primarily attributable to the significant reduction in IT spending from the financial service companiesdelays in the aftermathavailability of new products during the first three quarters of the recent financial crisis and recession.year.
For the year ended December 31, 2010,2013, operating expenses were $5,715, an increase of $283, or 5%, compared to operating expense of $5,432 in the prior year. The increase in operating expense resulted primarily from an increase in outside engineering services and stock option compensation expense. For the year ended December 31, 2013, the loss from operations was $5,254,$4,764, an increase of $2,484,$1,649, or 90%53%, compared with a loss from operations of $2,770$3,115 in the prior year. The increase in the operating loss is primarily attributable to the net effect of lower revenue for$960 decrease in sales and the year ended December 31, 2010, and a charge of $1,009 related to the acceleration of amortization of certain capitalized software development costs. For the year ended December 31, 2010, operating expenses were $6,105, an increase of $1,399, or 30%, compared to operating expense of $4,706 in the prior year. The$283 increase in operating expense primarily reflects the accelerated amortization of certain capitalized software development costs, as well as an increase in general administrative costs related to the accrual for severance pay for three executives in December 2010.expenses.
From MayAugust 2013 through July 2010,December 2013, the Company received $1,260secured $1,150 in additional funding through10% demand notes from related parties and others. In November 2013, the Board of Directors approved the issuance of additional secured indebtedness. Inwarrants in connection with these loans,approved issuances of demand notes. The Company issued 21,667 warrants associated with the demand notes. These warrants have a three-year life from the date of grant and an exercise price of $0.03. See additional information on the demand notes and warrants in Liquidity and Capital Resources, Financing Transactions.
In November 2013, the Company borrowed $60 in additional demand notes from an employee of the Company. The notes plus accrued interest of $1 were repaid at December 31, 2013 from financing proceeds.
In November 2013, the Company’s stockholders approved an amendment of the Company’s Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation to increase the number of authorized shares of Series D-1 Convertible Preferred Stock (the “Series D-1 Preferred Stock”) and Series D-2 Convertible Preferred Stock (the “Series D-2 Preferred Stock”, and, together with Series D-1 Preferred Stock, the “Series D Preferred Stock”) (the “Charter Amendment”). The authorized number of shares of Series D-1 Preferred Stock was increased from 3,000 shares to 6,000 shares and the Series D-2 Preferred Stock was increased from 8,000 shares to 9,000 shares. The Charter Amendment allows the Company to have additional shares of stock available for possible future capital raising activities as may be approved by the Board of Directors.
On December 31, 2013, the Company entered into subscription agreements (the “Subscription Agreements”) with certain investors (each, an “Investor,” and, collectively, the “Investors”). Under the terms of the Subscription Agreements, the Investors purchased an aggregate of 696 Units (each a “Unit,” and, collectively, the “Units”) at a purchase price of $3.00 per Unit for an aggregate purchase price of approximately $2,089, which amount included the conversion of $1.18 million in existing indebtedness and related interest. Each Unit consists of two (2) shares of Series D-1 Preferred Stock and one (1) share of Series D-2 Preferred Stock.
The Investors were also issued warrants to purchase18,000purchase approximately 18,989 shares of Common Stock with an exercise priceat the time of $0.06 per share, whichthe funding of their investment. These warrants are exercisable for a period of three years fromand have an exercise price of $0.0275 per share. In addition to the datewarrants issued at closing, the Subscription Agreements entitle Investors to receive warrants to purchase up to an additional 56,207 shares of issuance.Common Stock based on whether the Company attains certain revenue targets in 2014. Any such additional warrants will be exercisable until December 31, 2016 and will have an exercise price of $0.0275 per share.
The Company closed a recapitalization on August 5, 2010, issuing 6,608 shareshad previously raised $1.15 million in May 2013 through the issuance of Series B Preferred Stock, par value $0.01, in exchange for all of the Company’s $6,608 of outstanding secured indebtedness under an Exchange Agreement (the “Recapitalization”). Simultaneous with the closing of the Recapitalization, the Company also sold an additional 1,440 shares of Series B Preferred Stock in a private placement, receiving $1,440 in gross proceeds (the “Series B Financing”).
On December 31, 2010, the Company sold 2,211 shares of Series C Preferred Stock in a private placement, receiving $2,211 in gross proceeds. In connection with the saleunits comprised of shares of Series CD-1 Preferred Stock and Series D-2 Preferred Stock. All investors from the Company alsoMay 2013 financing
agreed to exchange the securities issued to purchasersthem in the prior financing for the same securities issued to investors in the financing closed on December 31, 2013, with the investors from the May 2013 financing receiving in such exchange an aggregate of Series C Preferred Stock383 Units and warrants to purchase 98,244an aggregate of 10,455 shares of Common Stock, with an exercise price of $0.0225 per share, which are exercisable for a period of three years from the date of issuance. The issuance of shares of Series C Preferred Stock andability to receive warrants to purchase up to an additional 30,946 shares of Common Stock is referredbased on whether the Company attains certain revenue targets in 2014.
Expenses associated with the above transactions were approximately $40, which went in payment of administrative fees to collectively herein asSG Phoenix LLC, an affiliated entity of Phoenix Venture Fund LLC (“Phoenix”), the “Series C Financing.”Company’s largest stockholder.
New Accounting Pronouncements
See Note 1, Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements included under Part IV, Item 15 of this report on Form 10-K.
Critical Accounting Policies
The preparation of financial statements and related disclosures in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America requires management to make judgments, assumptions and estimates that affect the amounts reported in the Company’s consolidated financial statements and the accompanying notes. The amounts of assets and liabilities reported in its balance sheets and the amounts of revenue and expenses reported for each period presented are affected by these estimates and assumptions that are used for, but not limited to, revenue recognition, allowance for doubtful accounts, intangible asset impairments, fair value of financial instruments, software development costs,cost of sales, research and development costs, foreign currency translation, and net operating loss carry-forwards.carry-forwards and valuation allowances on deferred tax assets. Actual results may differ from these estimates. The following critical accounting policies are significantly affected by judgments, assumptions and estimates used by the Company’s management in the preparation of the consolidated financial statements.
Stock based Compensation: Share-based compensation expense is based on the estimated grant date fair value of the portion of share-based payment awards that are ultimately expected to vest during the period. The grant date fair value of stock-based awards to employees and directors is calculated using the Black Scholes valuation model. Forfeitures of share-based payment awards are estimated at the time of grant and revised, if necessary, in subsequent periods if actual forfeitures differ from those estimates. Forfeitures are estimated and it is assumed no dividends will be declared. The estimated fair value of stock-based compensation awards to employees is amortized over the vesting period of the options.
Valuation of equity warrants: The Company values warrants issued using the Black Scholes pricing model.
Derivatives: The Company follows the relevant accounting guidance and records derivative instruments (including certain derivative instruments embedded in other contracts) in the balance sheet as either an asset or a liability measured at itstheir fair value, with changes in the derivative’s fair value recognized currently in earnings unless specific hedge accounting criteria are met.earnings. The Company values these derivative securities under the fair value method at the end of each reporting period (quarter), and their value is marked to marketmarked-to-market at the end of each reporting period with the gain or loss recognition recorded in earnings. The Company continues to revalue these instruments each quarter to reflect their current value in light of the current market price of our Common Stock. The Company utilizesused a discounted Black-Scholes option-pricingsimulated probability valuation model to estimatevalue warrants containing embedded derivative instruments. Determining the appropriate fair-value model and calculating the fair value. Keyvalue of such warrants requires considerable judgment. Any change in the estimates (specifically, probabilities) used may cause the value to be higher or lower than that reported. The assumptions ofused in the Black-Scholes option-pricing model required significant judgment by management and include applicablethe following: volatility, rates,expected term, risk-free interest ratesrate, dividends, warrant holders’ expected rate of return, reset provisions based on expected future financings, projected stock prices, and the instrument’s expected remaining life. These assumptions require significant management judgment.probability of exercise.
Revenue: Revenue is recognized when earned in accordance with the applicable accounting guidance. The Company recognizes revenue from sales of software products upon shipment, provided that persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists, collection is determined to be probable, all non-recurring engineering work necessary to enable the Company's product to function within the customer's application has been completed and the Company's
product has been delivered according to specifications. Revenue from service subscriptions is recognized as costs are incurred or over the service period, whichever is longer.
Software license agreements may contain multiple elements, including upgrades and enhancements, products deliverable on a when and if available basis and post contractpost-contract support. Revenue from software license agreements is recognized upon delivery of the software, provided that persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists, collection is determined to be probable, all nonrecurring engineering work necessary to enable the Company's products to function within the customer's application has been completed and the CompanyCompany's product has been delivered its product according to specifications.
For arrangements with multiple deliverables, the Company allocates consideration at the inception of an arrangement to all of its deliverables based on their relative selling prices, which are determined using vendor-specific objective evidence.
Maintenance revenue is recorded for post-contract support and upgrades or enhancements, which is paid for in addition to license fees, and is recognized as costs are incurred or over the support period, whichever is longer. For undelivered elements where vendor specific objective and reliable evidence of fair value does not exist, revenue is deferred and subsequently recognized when delivery has occurred and when fair valuevendor specific evidence has been determined.
The allowance for doubtful accounts is based on the Company’s assessment of the collectability of specific customer accounts and an assessment of international, political and economic risk as well as the aging of the accounts receivable. If there is a change in actual defaults from the Company’s historical experience, the Company’s
estimates of recoverability of amounts due could be affected and the Company would adjust the allowance accordingly.
Long-lived assets: The Company performs intangible asset impairment analyses in accordance withevaluates the applicable accounting guidance. The Company uses the guidance in response to changes in industry and market conditions that affect its patents, the Company then determines if an impairmentrecoverability of its long-lived assets, has occurred. The Company reassesses the lives of itsincluding intangible assets such as patents, and tests for impairment at least annually or whenever circumstances or events indicate such assets might be impaired. The Company would recognize an impairment charge in order to determine whether the event the net book value exceedsof such assets exceeded the fair value for each patent. Fair value is determined by estimatingfuture undiscounted cash flows attributable to such assets. Estimation of future cash flows from the products that are and will be protected by the patents and consideringconsiders the following additional factors:
| · | whether there are legal, regulatory or contractual provisions known to the Company that limit the useful life of any patent to less than the assigned useful life; |
| · | whether the Company needs to incur material costs or make modifications in order for it to continue to be able to realize the protection afforded by the patents; |
| · | whether any effects of obsolescence or significant competitive pressure on the Company’s current or future products are expected to reduce the anticipated cash flow from the products covered by the patents; |
| · | whether demand for products utilizing the patented technology will diminish, remain stable or increase; and |
| · | whether the current markets for the products based on the patented technology will remain constant or will change over the useful lives assigned to the patents. |
The Company obtained an independent valuation from Strategic Equity Group of the carrying value of its patents as of December 31, 2005. The Company believes that the biometric market potential identified in current year market research has improved over the data used to validate the carrying value of the Company’s patents at the end of 2005. Management updated this analysis at December 31, 2010 and believes that that no impairment of the carrying value of the patents exists at December 31, 2010.
Customer Base: To date, the Company's electronic signature revenue has been derived primarily from financial service industry end-users and from resellers and channel partners serving the financial service industry primarily in North America, the ASEAN Region and Europe. The Company performs periodic credit evaluations of its customers and does not require collateral. The Company maintains reserves for potential credit losses. Historically, such losses have been within the range of management's expectations.
Software Development CostsCost of sales: : Software development costs are accountedCost of sales includes direct engineering labor and overhead for in accordancespecific revenue based projects initiated by customers and maintenance projects specific to customer needs, along with the applicable accounting guidance. Under that guidance, capitalization of software development costs begins upon the establishment of technological feasibility, subject to net realizable value considerations. The costs capitalized include the coding and testing of the product after technological feasibility has been established and ends upon the release of the product. The annual amortization is equalthird party services related to the straight-line amortization over the estimated useful lives of the software and varies by type of software. The Company generally subdivides its software into product software, server software and software-as-a-service. The Company capitalized software development costs of approximately $772 and $813 for the years ended December 31, 2010 and 2009, respectively. For the year ended December 31, 2010, the Company decided to accelerate the amortization of its software portfolio to better reflect the transition of its offering from being mostly product-based to becoming mostly server and service-based and to provide a closer match with the useful life of the development costs being capitalized. This acceleration resulted in a one-time increase in amortization expense of $1,009.Company’s transactional based revenues.
Research and Development Costs: Research and development costs are charged toas expense as incurred.
Net Operating Loss Carry-forwards: Utilization of the Company's net operating losses may be subject to an annual limitation due to the ownership change limitations provided byunder Section 382 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 and similar state provisions. As a result, a portion of the Company's net operating loss carry-forwards may not be available to offset future taxable income. The Company has provided a full valuation allowance for deferred tax assets at December 31, 20102013, of approximately $27.4$29 million based upon the Company's history of losses.
Segments: The Company reports its financial results in one segment.
Results of Operations – Years Ended December 31, 20102013 and December 31, 20092012
Revenue
For the year ended December 31, 2010,2013, total revenue was $851,$1,418, a decrease of $1,085,$960, or 56%40%, compared to total revenue of $1,936$2,378 in the prior year. For the year ended December 31, 2010,2013, product revenue was $197,$728, a decrease of $988,$1,001, or 83%58%, compared to $1,185$1,729 in the prior year. The Company believes the decrease in product revenue is primarily dueattributable to the slow and moderate increase in IT spending by large financial service companies (historically, CIC’s primary target market)delays in the aftermathavailability of new products during the first three quarters of the recent financial crisis and recession.year. For the year ended December 31, 2010,2013, maintenance revenue was $654, a decrease$690, an increase of $97,$41, or 13%6%, compared to maintenance revenue of $751$649 in the prior year. This decreaseincrease is primarily due to lower maintenance revenue from four customers that signed multi year contracts at a reduced annual rate.an increase in the sale of enterprise licenses compared to the prior year.
Cost of Sales
For the year ended December 31, 2010,2013, cost of sales was $879,$344, a decrease of $6,$31, or 1%8%, compared to cost of sales of $885$375 in the prior year. The decrease resultedwas due primarily to lower engineering direct labor costs resulting from a $161 reduction in directlower non-recurring engineering costs due toorders during the absence of development contract services revenue, offset by an increase in amortization of $110 related to previously capitalized software development costs associated with the Company’s product and maintenance revenue and a $45 increase in third party tablet costs.year ended December 31, 2013.
Operating Expenses
Research and Development Expenses
For the year ended December 31, 2010,2013, research and development expenses were $431,$2,073, an increase of $88,$271, or 26%15%, compared to research and development expenses of $343$1,802 in the prior year. Research and development expenses consist primarily of salaries and related costs, outside contract engineering as required, maintenance items, and allocated facility expenses. The most significant factorfactors contributing to the increase in theseengineering expenses was a charge of $1,009 relatedwere an increase in salaries and wages due to the accelerationaddition of certain capitalizedthree full time positions, and an increase in outside engineering services associated with the Company’s software development costs.activities. For the year ended December 31, 2010,2013, total research and development expenses before capitalization of software development costs and other allocations were $1,396, a decrease$2,520, an increase of $265,$242, or 16%11%, compared to $1,661$2,278 of total research and development expenses before capitalization of software development costs and other allocations in the prior year. In 2010, a senior level engineer was transferredThe increase is due primarily to salesan increase in salaries and marketingrelated expenses, including stock compensation expense and the increase in the position of sales engineer. The transfer resulted in a reduction of totaloutside engineering expense before allocations. Research and development expenses before capitalization of software development costs, as well as the amounts to be capitalized on future product development, are expected to remain consistent with the 2010 amount in the near term.services.
Sales and Marketing Expenses
For the year ended December 31, 2010,2013, sales and marketing expenses were $1,531, an increase$1,272, a decrease of $30,$120, or 2%9%, compared to sales and marketing expenses of $1,501$1,392 in the prior year. The increasedecrease was primarily attributable to an increase of $199, or 28%,the lower commissions resulting from the above mentioned decrease in salaryrevenue and a decrease in salaries and related expenses which wasresulting from the result of the Company’s employees returning to full salary in January 2010 following a six-month period in which the compensation of the Company’s employees had been reduced by 14% under the terms of a salary reduction plan agreed to by the Company's employees in June 2009, and an increase in head countloss of one senior level sales engineer transferred from engineering. General marketing expenses were $625, a decrease of $169, or 21%, from general marketing expenses of $794 in the prior year. This reduction was primarily due to decreases in advertising and promotion, commissions and allocated charges from engineering for sales support.person.
General and Administrative Expenses
For the year ended December 31, 2010,2013, general and administrative expenses were $2,255,$2,026, an increase of $278,$163, or 14%9%, from general and administrative expenses of $1,977$1,863 in the prior year. The increase was primarily due to an increase of $167, or 19%, in salaries and related expenses as a result of the Company’s employees returning to full salarystock option compensation expense offset by decreases in January 2010 following a six-month period in which the compensation of the Company’s employees had been reduced by 14% under the terms of a salary reduction plan as discussed above, and an accrual for severance pay for three senior level executives who resigned in December 2010. Otherother general and administrative expenses increased $111, or 15%, due primarily to professional services and investor relations expenses indirectly associated with the Recapitalization and Series B Financing and the Series C Financing.operating expenses.
Other Income (Expense), Net
Interest and other income,Other expense, net, decreasedwas $23, an increase of $4, to expense of $2,or 21%, compared to an incomeexpense of $2$19 in the prior year. The increase was due to administrative expenses related to the joint venture in China.
Interest Expense
For the year ended December 31, 2010,2013, related party interest expense was $255, a decrease$436, an increase of $57,$336, or 18%336%, compared to related party interest expense of $312 in the prior year. The decrease was due to the restructuring of the Company’s debt in the August 5, 2010 Recapitalization through the issuance of Series B Preferred Stock in exchange for all outstanding secured indebtedness. For the year ended December 31, 2010, interest expense-other was $8, a decrease of $35, or 81%, compared to interest expense-other of $43 in the prior year. The decrease was primarily due to the same factors discussed above. For the year ended December 31, 2010, amortization of related party loan discount and deferred financing, which includes warrant costs associated with the Company’s debt and deferred financing costs associated with the notes and warrant purchase agreements was $1,719, an increase of $119, or 7%, compared to amortization of related party loan discount and deferred financing of $1,600$100 in the prior year. The increase was primarily due to the cost of warrants associated with short-term borrowings issued prior to November 2013. For the year ended December 31, 2013, other party interest expense was $0, a decrease of $89, or 100%, compared to other party interest expense of $89 in the prior year. For the year ended December 31, 2013, amortization of related party loan discount was $44, an increase of $30, or 214%, compared to $14 in the loan discount amortization of the cost of the warrants being issued with the bridge notes prior year. The increase was primarily due to the restructuring of the Company’s debt.increase in short-term borrowings in 2013. (See Note 37 to the Consolidated Financial Statements of this report on Form 10-K.)
For the year ended December 31, 2010,2013, amortization of loandebt discount and other party deferred financing-other,financing, which includes warrant and deferred financing costs associated with the notes and warrant purchase agreements,short-term borrowings was $57,$0, a decrease of $21,$50, or 27%100%, compared to $78$50 in the prior year. The decrease was primarily due to the factors discussed in interest expense above. (See Note 3 to the Consolidated Financial Statements of this report on Form 10-K.)
For the year ended December 31, 2010, there2013, the Company recorded a loss on extinguishment of debt of $67, an increase of $67, or 100% compared to the prior year. The increase was no loss recorded for debt extinguishmentdue to the conversion of short-term notes into shares of Series D Preferred stock in December 2013, resulting in the write off of the remaining discount associated with the warrants issued in November 2013.
The change in fair value of derivative liabilities resulted in a non-cash gain of $103, a decrease of $108, or 51% compared to a loss on debt extinguishmentgain of $829 recorded$211 in the prior year. The loss on debt extinguishment relatedchange in fair value is primarily due to a decrease in the cancellationnumber of notes and issuance of new notes as part of the May 2009 financing. This $829 represented unamortized debt discount and deferred financing cost associated with the cancelled notes.
The non-cash gain on derivative liabilities of $3,136 resultedoutstanding derivatives from the revaluationexercise and expiration of warrants and the conversion of shares of Series C Preferred Stock during 2013, as well as a decrease in the closing price of the Company’s derivativesCommon Stock at December 31, 2010 .2013. The Company recorded a non-cash lossfair value of the Company’s derivative instruments is based on derivative liabilities in the periodfair value of adoption of ASC 815 of $5,136 for the year ended December 31, 2009. (See Note 4 to the Consolidated Financial Statements of this report on Form 10-K).our Common Stock. As such, related gains and losses are dependent upon our Common Stock price and fluctuate accordingly.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
Cash and cash equivalents totaled $1,879$945 at December 31, 2010,2013, compared to cash and cash equivalents of $1,021$486 at December 31, 2009. This2012. The increase is primarily attributable to $3,889$3,199 of funds provided by financing activities offset by $2,245$2,736 used in operating activities and $786$5 of funds used in investing activities.
The cash used by operations was primarily attributable to the net loss of $4,159$4,764 and the non-casha $103 gain on derivative liability of $3,136.liabilities. These amounts were offset by non-cash charges of depreciation and amortization of $3,000, a charge to
$380, amortization expense of $1,009 related to accelerationdebt discount and deferred financing costs and loss on extinguishment of the period over which certain capitalized software developmentdebt of $111, warrant costs are amortized,of $436 and stock-based employee compensation of $93, restricted stock expense and stock issued for services of $106, noncash financing costs of $291, and changes in operating assets and liabilities of $551.
$819.
The cash used in investing activities of $786$5 was due to capitalized software development costs of $772 and the acquisition of office and computer equipment of $14.equipment.
Proceeds from financing activities consisted primarily of $1,390$1,460 in net proceeds from the issuance of short-term debt, $860$29 in proceeds from the exercise of warrants for cash, and $2,020 in net proceeds from the issuance of Series BD Preferred Stock in the Series B Financing and $1,789 in net proceeds from the issuance of Series C Preferred Stock in the Series C Financing.Stock. These proceeds were offset by the payment of $150 related to the short-term debt issued in December 2010.$310 of short term notes for cash.
Accounts receivable were $103$410 at December 31, 2010,2013, a decrease of $124,$291, or 55%42%, compared to accounts receivable of $227$701 at December 31, 2009.2012. Accounts receivable at December 31, 20102013 and 2009,2012, are net of $9$22 and $117,$27, respectively, in reservesfor allowances provided for potentially uncollectible accounts. Sales in the Company’s fourth quarter of 20102013 were 34%28% lower than 2009.in 2012.
Prepaid expenses and other current assets were $44$57 at December 31, 2010,2013, a decrease of $22,$16, or 33%22%, compared to prepaid expenses and other current assets of $66$73 at December 31, 2009.2012. The decrease is primarily due to the timingreduction in prepayments of the billingsDirectors and payments ofOfficers Liability Insurance premiums and annual maintenance and other prepaid contracts.third party services. Prepaid expenses generally fluctuate due to the timing of annual insurance premiums and maintenance and support fees, which are prepaid in December and June of each year.
Accounts payable were $450$327 at December 31, 2010,2013, an increase of $332,$252, or 281%336%, from accounts payable of $118$75 at December 31, 2009.2012. The increase in accounts payable is primarily due to increases in liabilities associated with professional fees incurred in connection with the Recapitalization, Series B Financing,outside engineering services and Series C Financing during the second half of the 2010.other expenses.
Other current liabilities, which include accrued compensation of $446, were $605$315 at December 31, 2010,2013, were $547 at December 31, 2013, an increase of $109,$108, or 22%25%, compared to other current liabilities of $496$439 at December 31, 2009.2012. The increase is primarily due to the accrual of severance pay for three senior level executives andprofessional services compared to the revised terms of office rent in 2010.prior year.
Deferred revenue was $1,106$564 at December 31, 2010,2013, a decrease of $219,$254, or 17%31%, compared to deferred revenue of $1,325$818 at December 31, 2009.2012. The decrease is primarily due to primarily to the long-termrecognition of several long term maintenance contracts that were renewed at a discount compared to the annual renewal amounts.entered into in prior years.
Financing Transactions
TheIn April 2013, the Company had outstanding debt with a principal balance of $6,608 (recordedborrowed $250 in the balance sheet netform of a discount of $1,509) immediately prior to the conversion of debt in August 2010 (see Note 3 to the Consolidated Financial Statements). The outstanding balance included $1,260 of funds borrowed through bridge financing obtained in May, June and July 2010demand note from Phoenix Banner Holdings LLC, with the following terms: an interest rate of 8%10% per annumannum.
In May 2013, the Company completed a private placement of 230 units of Series D Preferred Stock. Each unit consisted of one (1) share of Series D-1 Preferred Stock and four (4) shares of Series D-2 Preferred Stock. The Series D-1 Preferred Stock can convert to Common Stock at a maturity dateprice of $0.0225 per share, and the Series D-2 Preferred Stock can convert to Common Stock at a price of $0.05 per share. The Company received $1,150 in proceeds from this private placement. The proceeds were used for general working capital purposes and to repay a demand note from Phoenix Banner Holdings LLC in the amount of $250 plus $2 in accrued interest.
From August 2013 through December 31, 2010.2013 the Company secured $1,150 in 10% demand notes from related parties and others that was used for working capital and general corporate purposes. In November, the Board of Directors approved the issuance of warrants in addition to the interest on these demand notes. The Company issued 21,667 warrants, 14,583 of which were issued for the notes secured prior to purchase an aggregateNovember 6, 2013, and a total of 18,000 shares7,084 warrants were issued for demand notes secured on November 26, and December 13, 2013. The Company ascribed a value of Common Stock$406, recorded as interest expense, to the warrants issued prior to November 6, 2013, and ascribed a value of $111, recorded as a debt discount to the warrants issued with notes secured after November 6, 2013. The Company recorded $44 in debt discount amortization expense and $67 in loss on extinguishment of debt upon conversion of the notes. The warrants have a three year life from the date of grant and an exercise price of $0.06 per share expiring in periods from May 2013 through July 2013 with the bridge financings. The remaining principal balance of $5,348 relates to funds raised in financing transactions in 2008$0.03.. Detail on these demand notes and 2009. The funds raised in these financings had the following terms: interest at 8% per annum and, at the option of the Company, interest could be paid in cash or in kind. Warrants to purchase 80,154 shares of Common Stock with exercise prices of $0.06 and expiration date of June 30, 2012, were issued in the prior financing transactions. Upon execution of each financing a debt discount was recorded. At December 31, 2009, a discount of $2,222 was included in the debt balance. For the years ended December 30, 2010 and 2009, amortization of the debt discount and deferred financing costs was $1,776 and $1,678, respectively. The unamortized discount of $1,509 was charged to paid-in capital in connection with conversion of the associated debt into shares of Series B Preferred Stock (see Note 3 to the Consolidated Financial Statements). The warrants included in the financing transactions were determined to be derivative liabilities (see Note 5 to the Consolidated Financial Statements).is as follows:
| | . | | | Phoenix Banner Holdings LLC | | | Michael W. Engmann | | | Kendu Partners Company | | | JAG Multi Investments | | | Philip Sassower | |
| Date | | | Note Amount | | | Warrants | | | Note Amount | | | Warrants | | | Note Amount | | | Warrants | | | Note Amount | | | Warrants | | | Note Amount | | | Warrants | |
| 8/2/2013 | | | $ | 250 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| 9/3/2013 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | $ | 250 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| 9/27/2013 | | | | | | | | | | $ | 250 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| 11/1/2013 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | $ | 125 | | | | 2,083 | | | | | | | |
| 11/6/2013 | | | | | | | | 4,167 | | | | | | | | 4,167 | | | | | | | | 4,167 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| 12/13/2013 | | | | | | | | | | | $ | 150 | | | | 5,000 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| 12/17/2013 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | $ | 125 | | | | 2,083 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Total | | | $ | 250 | | | | 4,167 | | | $ | 400 | | | | 9,167 | | | $ | 250 | | | | 4,167 | | | $ | 125 | | | | 2,083 | | | $ | 125 | | | | 2,083 | |
The warrants were valued using the Black Sholes pricing model with the following assumptions:
| Date | Expected Term | Volatility | Risk free interest rate | Dividend yield |
| 11/6/2013 | Three years | 202.9% | 0.58% | $0.00 |
| 11/26/2013 | Three years | 200.8% | 0.55% | $0.00 |
| 12/3/2013 | Three years | 198.8% | 0.68% | $0.00 |
| 12/17/2013 | Three years | 198.0% | 0.68% | $0.00 |
In November 2013, in addition to the above, the Company borrowed, in the form of demand notes, $60 from an employee of the Company. The notes plus accrued interest of $1 were repaid at December 31, 2013, from the proceeds of the financing.
In May and June 2010,2013, the Company received $960completed a private placement of 230 units of Series D Preferred Stock consisting of one (1) share of Series D-1 Preferred Stock and four (4) shares of Series D-2 Preferred Stock. The private placement provided $1,150 in proceeds to the $1,260Company.
On December 31, 2013 all investors from the May 2013 financing agreed to exchange the securities issued to them in additional funding through the issuance of additional secured indebtedness. In connectionprior financing for the same securities issued to investors in the financing closed on December 31, 2013, with the issuanceinvestors from the May 2013 financing receiving in such exchange an aggregate of this indebtedness, the Company issued warrants383 Units and an initial warrant grant to purchase 16,000approximately 10,455 shares of Common Stock, with the ability to receive warrants to purchase up to an exercise priceadditional 30,945 shares of $0.06 per share, which are exercisableCommon Stock based on whether the Company attains certain revenue targets in 2014.
On December 31, 2013, the Company converted approximately $1.18 of short-term debt plus accrued interest into 786 shares of Series D-1 Preferred Stock and 393 shares of Series D-2 Preferred Stock.
On December 31, 2013, the Company sold for a period$870 in cash, net of three years from$40 administrative fee paid to SG Phoenix, 607 Shares of Series D-1 preferred Stock and 303 shares of Series D-2 Preferred Stock.
Along with the dateconversion of issuance. The Company ascribed a valuedebt and sale of $622 to the warrants, which was recorded as a discount to “Current portion of long-term debt” in the balance sheet. Prior to conversion upon the closing of the Recapitalization, this additional secured indebtedness was due to maturePreferred shares on December 31, 2010.
In July 2010,2013 the Company received an additional $300 through the issuance of additional secured indebtedness. In connection with the issuance of an additional secured promissory note to an investor, the CompanyInvestors were also issued warrants to purchase 2,000 shares of Common Stock with an exercise price of $0.06 per share, which are exercisable for a period of three years from the date of issuance. The Company ascribed a value of $60 to the warrants, which was recorded as a discount to “Current portion of long-term debt” in the balance sheet. Prior to conversion upon the closing of the Recapitalization, this additional secured indebtedness was due to mature on December 31, 2010.
On August 5, 2010, the Company completed the conversion of all of the Company’s outstanding secured indebtedness into shares of Series B Preferred Stock in the Recapitalization. The Company issued approximately 6,608 shares of Series B Preferred Stock in the Recapitalization. At the same time, the Company also issued an additional 1,440 shares of Series B Preferred Stock for proceeds of $1,440, net of expenses of $437, in the Series B Financing. In addition, the Company paid approximately $143 in expenses to a third party in connection with the financing. The expenses were recorded as a charge to additional paid in capital. The proceeds are to be used for working capital and general corporate purposes, in each case in the ordinary course of business, and to pay fees and expenses associated with the Recapitalization.
The Series B Preferred Stock carries a ten percent (10%) annual dividend, payable quarterly in arrears in cash or in additional shares of Series B Preferred Stock, has a liquidation preference over Common Stock of one dollar and fifty cents ($1.50) per share and was convertible into18,989 shares of Common Stock at the initial conversion price of six cents ($0.06) per share.
In December 2010, as described in greater detail below, the Company issued 2,211 shares of Series C Preferred Stock in the Series C Financing, are initially convertible at a conversion price of two-and-a-quarter cents ($0.0225), which was less than the initial Series B conversion price of $0.06 per share. As a result, the conversion pricetime of the Series B Preferred Stock was adjusted to $0.0433 per share, resulting in an increase in the number of shares of common stock which would be issuable upon conversion of shares of Series B Preferred Stock to shares of Common Stock (see Note 5 to the Consolidated Financial Statements). The Series B Preferred Stock is convertible any time after August 5, 2010. On August 5, 2010, the Series B Preferred Stock’s conversion feature was determined to be a derivative liability in the amount of $2,000 of which $1,498 was attributable to related parties and $502 to the other holders. Due to the decline in the price of the Company’s Common Stock and the issuance of the Series C Preferred Stock, the fair value of the Series B Preferred Stock’s conversion feature was reduced to approximately $130 at December 31, 2010 (See Note 4 to the Consolidated Fiancial Statements). The Company issued 206 shares of Series B Preferred Stock in payment of dividends for the six-month period ended December 31, 2010. The conversion feature recorded on the Series B Preferred Stock dividends was $30. If the outstanding Series B Preferred Stock is converted in its entirety, the Company will issue 193,546 shares of Common Stock.
On December 31, 2010, the Company issued 2,211 shares of Series C Preferred Stock for proceeds of $2,211, net of expense of approximately $422, in the Series C Financing. The Series C Preferred Stock is senior to the Series B Preferred Stock and Series A-1 Preferred Stock and to all shares of Common Stock with respect to dividend rights and to rights on liquidation, winding-up and dissolution. The expenses were recorded as a charge to additional paid in capital. The proceeds are to be used for working capital and general corporate purposes, in each case in the ordinary course of business, and to pay fees and expenses associated with the sale of the Series C Preferred Stock.
The Series C Preferred Stock carries a ten percent (10%) annual dividend, payable quarterly in arrears in cash or in additional shares of Series C Preferred Stock. In preference to all other shares of the Company’s capital stock, the Series C
Preferred Stock will receive liquidating distributions in the amount of $1.50 per share plus any accrued dividends. The Series C Preferred Stock is convertible into Common Stock at any time at the option of the holder at an initial conversion price of $0.0225 per share, subject to adjustment for stock dividends, splits, combinations and similar events and, with certain exceptions, the issuance of additional securities at a purchase price less than the then current conversion price of the Series C Preferred Stock. The shares of Series C Preferred Stock are convertible any time after December 31, 2010. On December 31, 2010, the Series C Preferred Stock’s conversion feature was determined to be a derivative liability in the amount of $179, of which $113 is attributable to related parties and $66 to the other holders. If the outstanding Series C Preferred Stock is converted in its entirety, the Company will issue 98,244 shares of Common Stock.
After receiptfunding of their liquidation preferences, the Series C Preferred Stock and the Series B Preferred Stock will participate pro rata on an as-converted basis with the shares of Common Stock in any remaining liquidation proceeds (after payment of the liquidation preference on the Series C Preferred Stock, Series B Preferred Stock and Series A-1 Preferred Stock).
In connection with the sale of shares of Series C Preferred Stock, the Company also issued to purchasers of Series C Preferred Stock warrants to purchase 98,244 shares of Common Stock with an exercise price of $0.0225 per share, whichinvestment. These warrants are exercisable for a period of three years from the dateand have an exercise price of issuance.
During the year ended December 31, 2010, the Company exercised its option related$0.0275 per share. In addition to the terms ofwarrants issued at closing, the financing transactions and made the interest and dividend payments in kind. PriorSubscription Agreements entitle Investors to the Recapitalization, the Company issued new notes in the amount of $208, and issued additional three-yearreceive warrants to purchase 3,460up to an additional 56,966 shares of Common Stock at $0.06based on whether the Company attains certain revenue targets in 2014, as described therein. Any such additional warrants will be exercisable until December 31, 2016 and will have an exercise price of $0.0275 per share. The Company ascribed the fair value of $170 to the additional warrants. The fair value of the warrants was estimated on the commitment dates using a Black-Scholes pricing model. The Company issued 206 new share of Series B Preferred Stock as in-kind payment of dividends. The Company ascribed the fair value of $30 to the conversion feature of the Series B Preferred Stock paid in kind. The fair value of the conversion feature was estimated on the commitment dates using a Black-Scholes pricing model.
Interest expense associated with the Company’s indebtedness for the years ended December 31, 20102013 and 2009,2012, was $2,039$436 and $2,033,$189, respectively, of which $1,974$436 and $1,912,$100, respectively, was related party expense. Amortization of debt discount and deferred financing costs included in interest expensethe loss on extinguishment of debt for the year ended December 31, 20102013 and 2009,2012, was $1,776$111 and $1,678,$64, respectively, of which $1,719$111 and $1,600,$14, respectively, was related party expense.
Contractual Obligations
The Company had the following material commitments as of December 31, 2010:2013:
| | | Payments due by period | | |
| Contractual obligations | | Total | | | 2011 | | | 2012 | | | 2013 | | | 2014 | | | 2015 | | | Thereafter | | | Total | | | 2014 | | | 2015 | | | 2016 | | | 2017 | | | Thereafter | |
| Operating lease commitments (1) | | | 1,650 | | | | 284 | | | | 267 | | | | 275 | | | | 283 | | | | 292 | | | | 249 | | | | 826 | | | | 284 | | | | 293 | | | | 249 | | | | - | | | | - | |
| Total contractual cash obligations | | $ | 1,650 | | | $ | 284 | | | $ | 267 | | | $ | 275 | | | $ | 283 | | | $ | 292 | | | $ | 249 | | |
| 1. | The Company extended the lease on its offices in April 2010. The base rent will decreasedecreased by approximately 6% in November 2011 and thenwill increase by approximately 3% per annum over the term of the new lease, which expires on October 31, 2016. |
As of December 31, 2010,2013, the Company leasedleases facilities in the United States totaling approximately 10,0009,600 square feet. The Company’s rental expense was $275 and $275 for the years ended December 31, 20102013 and 2009, was approximately $281, and $303,2012, respectively. In addition to the base rent, the Company pays a percentage of the increase, if any, in operating cost costs
incurred by its landlord in such year, over the operating expenses incurred by its landlord in the base year.
As of December 31, 2010, the Company's principal source of liquidity was its cash and cash equivalents of $1,879. With the exception of 2004, in each year since the Company’s inception the Company has incurred losses. Revenue in 2010
reflects the significant negative impact on spending brought about by the recent financial crisis and recession. Delays in closing new sales could result in the need for additional funds. However, there can be no assurance that additional funds will be available when needed or, if available, will be on favorable terms or in the amounts the Company may require. If adequate funds are not available when needed, the Company may be required to delay, scale back or eliminate some or all of its marketing and development efforts or other operations, which could have a material adverse effect on the Company's business, results of operations and prospects. As a result of this uncertainty, our auditors have expressed substantial doubt about on our ability to continue as a going concern.
Item 7A. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
Interest Rate Risk. The Company has an investment portfolio ofAny investments in fixed income securities that are classified as cash equivalents. These securities, like all fixed income instruments, are subject to interest rate risk and will fall in value if the market interest rates increase. The Company attempts to limit this exposure by investing primarily in short-term securities. The Company did not enter into any short-term security investments during the twelve months ended December 31, 2010.2013.
Foreign Currency Risk. The Company operates a joint venture in China and from time to timetime-to-time could make certain capital equipment or other purchases denominated in foreign currencies. As a result, the Company's cash flows and earnings could be exposed to fluctuations in interest rates and foreign currency exchange rates. The Company would attempt to limit any such exposure through operational strategies and generally has not hedged currency exposure.
Future Results and Stock Price Risk. The Company's stock price may be subject to significant volatility. The public stock markets have experienced significant volatility in stock prices in recent years. The stock prices of technology companies have experienced particularly high volatility, including, at times, severe price changes that are unrelated or disproportionate to the operating performance of such companies. The trading price of the Company's Common Stock could be subject to wide fluctuations in response to, among other factors, quarter-to-quarter variations in operating results, announcements of technological innovations or new products by the Company or its competitors, competitor consolidation in the industry, announcements of new strategic relationships by the Company or its competitors, general conditions in the computer software industry or the global economy generally, or market volatility unrelated to the Company's business and operating results. The impact and severity of the above factors could be exacerbated by the Company’s small size, public float and a lack of market liquidity for its Common Stock.
Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data
The Company's audited consolidated financial statements for the years ended December 31, 20102013 and 2009,2012, and for each of the years in the two-year period ended December 31, 2010,2013, begin on page F-1F1 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K, and are incorporated into this item by reference.
Item 9. Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosures
None.
Item 9A. Controls and Procedures
Disclosure Controls and Procedures
The Company carried out an evaluation as of the end of the period covered by this report, under the supervision and with the participation of our management, including our Chief Executive Officer and our Chief Financial Officer, of the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures pursuant to paragraph (b) of Rule 13a-15 and 15d-15 under the Exchange Act.Act of 1934 (the “Exchange Act”). Based on that review,evaluation and because of the material weaknesses in our internal control over financial reporting described below, the Chief Executive Officer and the Chief Financial Officer have concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures arewere not effective to ensure that information required to be disclosed by the Company in the reports it files or submits under the Exchange Act (1) is recorded, processed, summarized, and reported within the time periods specified in the Securities and Exchange Commission’sSEC’s rules and forms, and (2) is accumulated and communicated to our management, including our principal executive officerChief Executive Officer and principal financial officer,Chief Financial Officer, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.disclosures.
The Company does not expect that its disclosure controls and procedures will prevent all error and all fraud. A control procedure, no matter how well conceived and operated, can provide only reasonable, not absolute, assurance that the objectives of the control procedures are met. Because of the inherent limitations in all control procedures, no evaluation of controls can provide absolute assurance that all control issues and instances of fraud, if any, within the Company have been detected. These inherent limitations include the realities that judgments in decision-making can
be faulty, and that breakdowns can occur because of simple error or mistake. Additionally, controls can be circumvented by the individual acts of some persons, by collusion of two or more people, or by management override of the control. The Company considered these limitations during the development of its disclosure controls and procedures, and will continually reevaluate them to ensure they provide reasonable assurance that such controls and procedures are effective.
Internal Control over Financial Reporting
Management’s Annual Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting
Management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting (as such term is defined in Rule 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934) which are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed in the reports we file or submit under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time specified in the Securities and Exchange Commission’s rules and forms, and that such information is accumulated and communicated to our management including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.
Under the supervision and with the participation of the Company’s management, including the Company’s Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, the Company has evaluated the effectiveness of the design and operation of itsreporting. Our internal control over financial reporting pursuantincludes those policies and procedures that (i) pertain to applicable rules under the Securities Exchange Actmaintenance of 1934,records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect transactions and dispositions of assets; (ii) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as amended. In making this assessment,necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures are being made only in accordance with authorizations of our management and directors; and (iii) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use or disposition of our assets that could have a material effect on our financial statements. Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements.
Management has assessed the effectiveness it’s the Company’s management usedinternal control over financial reporting based on the criteria established in “Internal Control, Integrated Framework” issued by the Committee of Sponsoring OrganizationOrganizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO)(“COSO”). A material weakness is a deficiency, or a combination of deficiencies, in internal control over financial reporting, such that there is a reasonable possibility that a material misstatement of the Company’s annual or interim financial statements will not be prevented or detected on a timely basis.
In performing this assessment, management identified the following material weaknesses:
As a small company with limited resources that are mainly focused on the development and sales of software products and services, CIC does not employ a sufficient number of staff in its finance department to possess an optimal segregation of duties or to provide optimal levels of oversight. This has resulted in certain audit adjustments and management believes that there may be a possibility for a material misstatement to occur in future periods while it employs the current number of personnel in its finance department.
Based on this evaluation, the Company’s its assessment, our management has concluded that, as of December 31, 2010,2013, our internal control over financial reporting was not effective. There are inherent limitations Management believes that the identified weaknesses have not affected our ability to present GAAP-compliant financial statements in this Form 10-K. During the effectiveness of any system of internal control overyear-end financial reporting. Accordingly, even an effective system of internal control overstatement close the Company was able adjust its financial reporting can only provide reasonable assurancerecords to properly present its financial statements and we were therefore able to present GAAP-compliant financial statements. Management does not believe that its weakness with respect to financial statement preparationits procedures and presentation in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. Our internal controls overhave had a pervasive effect upon our financial reporting are subjectdue to various inherent limitations,our ability to make the necessary reconciling adjustments to our financial statements.
Management’s Remediation Initiatives
Management conducts a number of activities to address the material weaknesses noted above, including cost limitations, judgments usedbut not limited to the following:
• Key managers and accounting personnel work closely with our independent audit firm in decision making, assumptions aboutevaluating our progress in remediating our material weaknesses with oversight by the likelihood of future events,audit committee;
• Evaluate control procedures on an ongoing basis, and, where possible, modify those control procedures to improve oversight;
• Evaluate, and, where possible, employ additional third party resources that can provide oversight support within the soundnessCompany’s budget constraints; and
• As the Company grows its business and the cash flow necessary to hire additional accounting personnel, management expects to pursue and implement such additional hires.
Elements of our systems,remediation plan can only be accomplished over time and we can offer no assurances that those initiatives will ultimately have the possibilityintended effects. Ultimately, revenue growth and performance improvements are the most likely avenue to greater resources that will improve the Company’s internal controls.
Management will continue the process of human errorreviewing existing controls, procedures and responsibilities to more closely identify financial reporting risks and the risk of fraud. Moreover, projections of any evaluation of effectivenessrequired controls to future periodsaddress them. Key control and compensating control procedures will be developed to ensure that material weaknesses are subjectproperly addressed and related financial reporting risks are mitigated. Periodic control validation and testing will also be implemented to the riskensure that controls may be inadequate because of changes in conditionscontinue to operate consistently and the risk that the degree of compliance with policies or procedures may deteriorate over time.
as designed.
Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting
There have not been any changes in the Company’s internal control over financial reporting (as such term is defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) under the Exchange Act) during the quarter ended December 31, 20102013 that our certifying officers concluded materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.
Item 9B. Other Information
None.
PART III
Item 10. Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance
Directors and Executive Officers
The following table sets forth certain information concerning the Company’s directors and executive officers:
| Name | Age | Positions with the Company |
| Philip S. Sassower, Chairman | 7173 | Chairman and Chief Executive Officer |
| Andrea Goren | 4346 | Director and Acting Chief Financial Officer |
| William Keiper | 6063 | Acting President and Chief Operating Officer |
Kurt AmundsonStanley Gilbert | 5774 | Director |
Francis J. ElenioJeffrey Holtmeier | 4456 | Director |
| David E. Welch | 6267 | Director |
The business experience of each of the directors and executive officers for at least the past five years includes the following:
Philip S. Sassowerhas served as the Company’s Chairman and Chief Executive Officer since August 2010. Mr. Sassower is a Managing Director of SG Phoenix LLC, a private equity firm, and has served in that capacity since May 2003. Mr. Sassower has also been Chief Executive Officer of Phoenix Enterprises LLC, a private equity firm, and has served in that capacity since 1996. In addition, Mr. Sassower has served as Chief Executive Officer of Xplore Technologies Corp. (OTCQB: XLRT) since February 2006 and has been a director of Xplore Technologies Corp. and served as Chairman of its board of directors since December 2004. On May 13, 2008, Mr. Sassower was named Chairman of the Board of The Fairchild Corporation (NYSE: FA), a motorcycle accessories and aerospace parts and services company. On March 18, 2009, The Fairchild Corporation and 61 subsidiaries filed a petition for bankruptcy under Chapter 11 of the U.S. Bankruptcy Code in the U.S. Bankruptcy Court, District of Delaware. On January 7, 2010, The Fairchild Corporation’s plan of liquidation was declared effective and the company’s board of directors was relieved of its duties. Mr. Sassower also served as Chairman of the Board of the Company from 1998 to 2002 and as Co-Chief Executive Officer of the Company from 1997 to 1998. Mr. Sassower is co-manager of the managing member of Phoenix Venture Fund LLC. Mr. Sassower’s qualifications to serve on the Board of Directors include more than 40 years of business and investment experience. Mr. Sassower has developed extensive
experience working with management teams and boards of directors, and in acquiring, investing in and building companies and implementing changes.
Andrea Goren has served as a director since August 2010. Mr. Goren was appointed the Company’s Acting Chief Financial Officer in December 2010. Mr. Goren is a Managing Director of SG Phoenix LLC, a private equity firm, and has served in that capacity since May 2003 and has been associated with Phoenix Enterprises LLC since January 2003. Prior to that, Mr. Goren served as Vice President of Shamrock International, Ltd., a private equity firm, from June 1999 to December 2002.firm. Mr. Goren has been a director of Xplore Technologies Corp. (OTCQB: XLRT) since December 2004 and of The Fairchild Corporation (NYSE: FA) sincefrom May 2008.2008 to January 2010. On March 18, 2009, The Fairchild Corporation and 61 subsidiaries filed a petition for bankruptcy under Chapter 11 of the U.S. Bankruptcy Code in the U.S. Bankruptcy Court, District of Delaware. On January 7, 2010, The Fairchild Corporation’s plan of liquidation was declared effective and the company’s board of directors was relieved of its duties. Mr. Goren is co-manager of the managing member of Phoenix Venture Fund LLC. Mr. Goren’s qualifications to serve on the Board of Directors include his experience and knowledge acquired in more than 11approximately 15 years of private equity investing. Mr. Goren has played a significantleading role in SG Phoenix LLC’s private equity investments and has developed extensive experience working with management teams and boards of directors, including at numerous public companies affiliated with SG Phoenix LLC.
William Keiper was appointed the Company’s Acting President and Chief Operating Officer in December 2010. Mr. Keiper is Managing Partner of First GlobalFirstGlobal Partners LLC where he specializes in working with investors and Boards of Directors in
resolving issues related to business continuity, performance and sustainable value creation. Mr. Keiper has over 30 years of business experience, more than 18 of which have been in the management of software, technology and IT product distribution and services organizations. He was President and Chief Executive Officer of Hypercom Corporation (NYSE: HYC) from 2005 to 2007 and served as a member of its Board of Directors from 2000 to 2007. He was Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of Arrange Technology LLC, a software development services outsourcing company, from 2002 to 2005. From 1997 to 2002, he served as a principal in mergers and acquisitions firms serving middle market software and IT services companies. He was Chief Executive Officer of Artisoft, Inc., a public networking and communications software company, from 1993 to 1997, and its Chairman from 1995 to 1997. He held several executive positions, including President and Chief Operating Officer, of MicroAge, Inc., an indirect sales-based IT products distribution and services company, from 1986 to 1993, where he was a key executive in helping to profitably drive more than a billion dollar revenue increase over the course of his tenure with the company. Kurt Amundson Stanley L. Gilberthas served as a director since September 2009. He is presently CFO of GoPro, a manufacturer of sports cameras and accessories, a position heOctober 2011. Mr. Gilbert has held since December 2009. Mr. Amundson has over 25more than 45 years of experience in financial and operating management, including 20 years at the CFO level of responsibility and higher, predominately with high tech firms in the Silicon Valley area. Mr. Amundson began his career with PricewaterhouseCoopers San Jose, California in 1980 after graduating from California Polytechnic State University. He attained his CPA certification in 1983. His experience as a VP-Finance/CFOlawyer with primary specialties in wills, trusts, estate planning and administration, as well as tax planning. Mr. Gilbert is Founder, and, has been President of private companies includes: Proxim, Inc., Mountain View, CA, Abaxis, Inc., Sunnyvale, CA, Metra Biosystems, Inc. Mountain View, CA, Shaman Pharmaceuticals, Inc., South San Francisco, CA, Adesso Healthcare Technology Services, Inc., San Jose, CA,Stanley L. Gilbert PC since 1982. Mr. Gilbert has also been a partner of a number of law firms, including Nager Korobow, Bell Kallnick Klee and CercoGreen, and Migdal Pollack Rosenkrantz and Sherman. Mr. Gilbert has served as a Director of Planned Giving at Columbia University Medical San Francisco, CA.Center’s Nathaniel Wharton Fund, which supports a broad variety of projects in basic research, clinical care and teaching since 2001. Mr. Amundson's COO/President experience includes positions with Medisys, Plc, Menlo Park, CAGilbert was elected by a majority of CIC’s Series C and Tuaki Medical, Inc., San Francisco, CA. As Chief Financial Officer,Series B Preferred stockholders voting together as a separate class on an as converted to common stock basis, and serves on CIC’s audit and compensation committees. Mr. Amundson's experience includes successfully leading multiple public financings and IPOs, a secondary financing, Eurobond Financing, and multiple private and venture capital backed equity financings. He has worked with multiple investment banks in the execution of successful public financings including Cowen & Co., Robertson Stephens & Co., Hambrecht & Quist, Furman Selz, Volpe Welty and Co., Nomura Securities (London), UBS Warburg (prior to merger with Paine Webber), CIBC World Markets/Oppenheimer & Co., and U.S. Bancorp Piper Jaffray. Mr. Amundson’sGilbert’s qualifications to serve on the Board of Directors include his significant financial management, operationaltax and leadership experience with several public companies.accounting expertise acquired through his years of practicing law.
Francis J. ElenioJeffrey Holtmeierhas served as a director since August 2010.2011. Mr. Elenio is Financial AdvisorHoltmeier has more than 25 years of successful entrepreneurship in the technology and communications fields. As CEO of GENext from 2001 to Premier Wealth Management,present, and through its subsidiary China US Business Development, LLC, Mr. Holtmeier has assisted many US companies in establishing relationships in China, where he also co-founded Koncept International, Inc., a wealth management company focused on mediumChinese-based VoIP and high net worth individuals,digital media technology company. Prior to his involvement in the Chinese market, Mr. Holtmeier founded, built over seventeen years and successfully sold InfiNET in 2001 to Teligent, a NASDAQ listed company. Mr. Holtmeier was a recipient of the prestigious Ernst & Young, NASDAQ/USA Today “Entrepreneur of the Year” award in 1999, and has served in that position since September 2007. In addition,on the boards of numerous corporations and non-profit organizations. He serves on CIC’s audit and compensation committees. Mr. Elenio is Chief Financial Officer of Wilshire Enterprises, Inc., a real estate investment and management company, and has served in that position since September 2006. Previously, Mr. Elenio was Chief Financial Officer of WebCollage, Inc., an internet content integrator for manufacturers, from March 2006 through August 2006. From November 2005 through March 2006, Mr. Elenio was interim Chief Financial Officer of TWS Holdings, Inc., a business process outsourcing company. From April 2004 until November 2005, Mr. Elenio was Chief Financial Officer and Director for Roomlinx, Inc., a provider of wireless high speed internet access to hotels and conference centers. Mr. Elenio has been a director of Xplore Technologies Corp. (OTCQB: XLRT) since November 2007. Mr. Elenio’sHoltmeier’s qualifications to serve on the Board of Directors include his significant financial management, operationalexperience as a successful entrepreneur and leadershiphis experience including over 20 years of public and private accounting. Mr. Elenio has extensive CFO level experience at public and private companies.in establishing business relationships in China.
David E. Welchhas served as a director since March 2004. From July 2002 to present Mr. Welch has been the principal of David E. Welch Consulting, a financial consulting firm. Mr. Welch has also been Vice President and
Chief Financial Officer of American Millennium Corporation, Inc., a provider of satellite basedsatellite-based asset tracking and reporting equipment, from April 2004 to present. Mr. Welch was Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of Active Link Communications, a manufacturer of telecommunications equipment, from 1999 to 2002. Mr. Welch has held positions as Director of Management Information Systems and Chief Information Officer with Micromedex, Inc. and Language Management International from 1995 through 1998. Mr. Welch other directorships have been with AspenBio Pharma, Inc., from 2004 to present, PepperBall Technologies, Inc. Fromfrom January 2007 to January 2009 and Advanced Nutraceuticals, Inc., from 2003 to 2006. Mr. Welch is a Certified Public Accountant licensed in the state of Colorado. He serves on CIC’s audit and compensation committees. Mr. Welch’s qualifications to serve on the Board of Directors include his significant accounting and financial expertise.
Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance
Section 16(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”), requires the Company's officers, directors and persons who own more than ten percent of a registered class of the Company's equity securities to file certain reports with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "SEC")SEC regarding ownership of, and transactions in, the Company's securities. These officers, directors and stockholders are also required by SEC rules to furnish the Company with copies of all Section 16(a) reports that are filed with the SEC. Based solely on a review of copies of such forms received by the Company and written representations received by the Company from certain reporting persons, the Company believes thatThe following Section 16 filings were not timely filed for the year ended December 31, 2010, all Section 16(a) reports required to be filed by2013: the Company's executive officers, directorsForm 4 for Andrea Goren dated January 3, 2013, March 31, 2013, May 15, 3013, June 30, 2013, September 30, 2013, November 6, 2013, November 26, 2013, December 31,2013, the Form 4 for Philip Sassower dated January 3, 2013, March 31, 2013, May 15, 3013, June 30, 2013, September 30, 2013, November 6, 2013, November 26, 2013, December 31,2013,the Form 4 for Stan Gilbert dated January 3, 2013, May 4, 2013, May 17, 2013, May 19,2013, June 3, 2013, June 30, 2013 and 10% stockholders were filed on a timely basis.December 16, 2013, the Form 4 for Jeffrey Holtmeier dated January 3, 2013 and the Form 4 for David Welch dated January 3, 2013.
Code of Business Conduct and Ethics
We have adopted a written code of business conduct and ethics, referred to as our Code of Business Conduct and Ethics, which applies to all of our directors, officers, and employees, including our principal executive officer, our principal financial and accounting officer, and our Chief Technology officer. A copy of the Code of Business Conduct and Ethics is posted on the Company’s web site, at www.cic.com.
Audit Committee Financial Expert
Mr. Welch serves as the Audit Committee’s financial expert. Each member of the Audit Committee is independent as defined under the applicable rules and regulations of the SEC and the director independence standards of the NASDAQ Stock Market, as currently in effect.
Item 11. Executive Compensation
Summary Compensation Table (in dollars)
Name and Principal Position | | Year | | Salary ($) | | Bonus ($) | | Stock Awards ($)(4) | | Option Awards ($) (5) | | Non-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation ($) | | Change in Pension Value And Nonqualified Deferred Compensation Earnings ($) | | All Other Compensation ($) | | Total ($) | |
Philip S. Sassower Chairman and CEO | | 2010 | | | -(1) | | | − | | | − | | | − | | | − | | | − | | | − | | | − | |
Andrea Goren Acting CFO | | | 2010 | | | -(2) | | | – | | | – | | | – | | | – | | | – | | | – | | | – | |
Guido DiGregorio Former President & COO | | | 2010 2009 | | | 262,156(3) 285,000(3) | | | − − | | | 31,038 − | | | − 51,297 | | | − − | | | − − | | | 10,388 10,388 | | | 303,582 346,685 | |
Frank Dane Former CLO & CFO | | | 2010 2009 | | | 169,157 145,500 | | | − − | | | 3,485 − | | | − 14,484 | | | − − | | | − − | | | − − | | | 172,642 159,984 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Name and Principal Position | Year | Salary ($) | Bonus ($) | Stock Awards ($) | Option Awards ($) (4) | Non-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation ($) | Change in Pension Value And Nonqualified Deferred Compensation Earnings ($) | All Other Compensation ($) | Total ($) |
Philip S Sassower Chairman and CEO | 2013 2012 | −(1) −(1) | − − | − − | $273,000 $ ─ | − − | − − | − − | $273,000 $ ─ |
| William Keiper, President | 2013 2012 | −(2) −(2) | − − | − − | $168,000 $ ─ | − − | − − | − − | $168,000 ─ |
Andrea Goren, CFO | 2013 2012 | -(3) -(3) | − − | − − | $126,000 $ ─ | − − | − − | − − | $126,000 ─ |
| | | | | | | | | |
| 1. | Mr. Sassower was appointed Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officerexecutive officer on August 5, 2010, and receives no compensation. |
| 2. | Mr. GorenKeiper was appointed ActingPresident and Chief FinancialOperating Officer on December 7, 2010, and2010. Mr. Keiper receives no compensation.salary compensation from the Company. |
| 3. | Mr. DiGregorio's 2010 salary includes $35,000 paid in August 2010 that he had voluntarily deferred from his 2009 salary. Mr. DiGregorio's 2009 salary includes $85,000 paid in June 2009 that he had voluntarily deferred from his 2008 salary. In connection with the Recapitalization and Series B Financing, in June 2010, Mr. DiGregorio gave up 25% of his 2010 annual salary, or $71,250, in exchange for shares of restricted stock which shares vested over a 12-month period. Mr. DiGregorio gave up 18% of his 2009 salary, or $50,000, as part of the overall Company salary reduction per the May 2009 financing. Mr. DiGregorio resignedGoren was appointed Chief Financial Officer on December 7, 2010. Mr. Goren receives no compensation from the Company. |
| 4. | The amounts provided in this column represent the aggregate grant date fair value of restricted stock awards granted to our officers, as calculated in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 718, Stock Compensation. |
5. | The amounts provided in this column represent the aggregate grant date fair value of option awards granted to our officers, as calculated in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 718, Stock Compensation. Mr. DiGregorioSassower has 2,902,7133,168,399 options that are vested and exercisable within sixty days of December 31, 2010.2013. Mr. DaneKeiper has 684,7649,334,399 options that are vested and exercisable within sixty days of December 31, 2010.2013. Mr. Goren has 6,167,799 options that are vested and exercisable within sixty days of December 31, 2013. In accordance with applicable regulations, the value of such options does not reflect an estimate for features related to service-based vesting used by the Company for financial statement purposes. See footnote 610 in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements included with this report on Form 10-K. |
ThereMr. Keiper is retained by the Company through an Advisory Services Agreement (the “FGP Agreement”) with First Global Partners, LLC (“FGP’). Mr. Keiper is Managing Partner of FGP. The term of the FGP Agreement is two years unless terminated earlier and will automatically renew for additional one year periods upon the same terms and conditions unless either party notifies the other in writing of its intent to terminate at least 90 days prior to the then-current term. FGP receives a cash sum payment of $20,000 (“Cash Fee”) per month. In addition, FPG is eligible for, but not entitled to receive, an annual cash performance fee of up to thirty-five percent (35%) of the Cash Fee during a given year or prorated portion thereof. Such performance fee, if any, would be awarded based upon the sole discretion of the Company’s Board of Directors. No performance fee was paid to FGP in 2013. Under the FGP Agreement, FGP furnishes, at its own expense, all materials and equipment necessary to carry out the terms of the FGP Agreement. The Company has agreed to pay FGP for reasonable and documented out of pocket expenses incurred for Services rendered by FGP during the term of the FGP Agreement, as long as FGP obtains written approval of the Company prior to incurring any significant expense.
Mr. Goren is retained by the Company through an Advisory Services Agreement (the “SGP Agreement”) with SG Phoenix LLC (“SGP”). Mr. Goren and Mr. Sassower are no employment agreements with any named executives, either written or oral. All employmentmanaging members of SGP. The term of the SGP Agreement is at will.two years unless terminated earlier and will automatically renew for additional one year periods upon
the same terms and conditions unless either party notifies the other in writing of its intent to terminate at least 90 days prior to the then-current term. SGP receives a cash sum payment of $15,000 (“Cash Fee”) per month. In addition, SGP is eligible for, but not entitled to receive, an annual cash performance fee of up to thirty-five percent (35%) of the Cash Fee during a given year or prorated portion thereof. Such performance fee, if any, would be awarded based upon the sole discretion of the Company’s Board of Directors. No performance fee was paid to SGP in 2013. Under the SGP Agreement, SGP furnishes, at its own expense, all materials and equipment necessary to carry out the terms of the SGP Agreement. The Company has agreed to pay SGP for reasonable and documented out of pocket expenses incurred for services rendered by SGP during the term of the SGP Agreement, as long as SGP obtains written approval of the Company prior to incurring any significant expense.
Outstanding Equity Awards at Fiscal 2010 Year EndDecember 31, 2013
The following table summarizes the outstanding equity award holdings held by our named executive officers. The amounts are not stated in thousands.
| Name and Principal Position | Number of Securities Underlying Unexercised Options (#) Exercisable | Number of Securities Underlying Unexercised Options (#) Unexercisable | Option Exercise Price ($) (3) | Option Expiration Date (10) |
| Philip S. Sassower, Chairman and CEO | − | − | − 916,700(1)
1,626,949(2) | – 83.300(1) 4,873,051(2) | $0.0649 $0.0450 | 01/28/2018 01/03/2020 |
| Guido DiGregorio,William Keiper, Former President & CEOand COO
| 1,275,000(1) 8,000,000(3)
425,000(2)
559,090(3)
184,701(4)
69,646(4)
63,721(4)
56,567(4)
53,202(4)
34,613(4)
24,926(4)
21,619(4)
23,347(4)
29,737(4)
37,107(4)
44,437(4) 1,001,199(4)
| −─(3)
−
−
−
−
−
−
−
−
−
−
−
−
−
−2,998,801(4)
| $ 0.750.0250 $ 0.39 $ 0.15
$ 0.08
$ 0.07
$ 0.08
$ 0.08
$ 0.09
$ 0.13
$ 0.18
$ 0.19
$ 0.18
$ 0.15
$ 0.12
$ 0.100.0450
| 06/07/201208/11/2018
06/07/2012
06/07/2012
07/15/2012
07/31/2012
08/14/2012
08/31/2012
09/15/2012
09/30/2012
10/15/2012
10/30/2012
11/13/2012
11/30/2012
12/15/2012
12/31/2012
01/03/2020 |
| Frank Dane, FormerAndrea Goren, CLO & CFOChief Financial Officer
| 35,985(5) 916,700(5)
107,958(6)3,750,000(6)
100,000(7)
279,545(8)
52,151(9)
19,665(9)
17,922(9)
15,972(9)
15,022(9)
9,733(9)
7,038(9)
6,104(9)
6,593(9)
8,396(9)
10,478(9)
12,547(9) 750,899(7)
| −83,300(5) −1,249,500(6)
−
−
−
−
−
−
−
−
−
−
−
–
−
−2,443,778(7)
| $ 0.390.0649 $ 0.750.0250 $ 0.55 $ 0.15
$ 0.08
$ 0.07
$ 0.08
$ 0.08
$ 0.09
$ 0.13
$ 0.18
$ 0.19
$ 0.18
$ 0.15
$ 0.12
$ 0.100.0450
| 06/07/201201/28/2018
06/07/201208/11/2018
06/07/2012
06/07/2012
07/15/2012
07/31/2012
08/14/2012
08/31/2012
09/15/2012
09/30/2012
10/15/2012
10/30/2012
11/13/2012
11/30/2012
12/15/2012
12/31/2012
|
| (1) Mr. DiGregorio's 1,275,000 options were granted on December 19, 2005, vested pro rata quarterly over three years, and expire on June 7, 2012.01/03/2020
|
| (1) | (2) Mr. DiGregorio's 425,000Sassower’s 1,000,000 options were granted on December 19, 2005, vested pro rata quarterly over three years, and expire on June 7, 2012. |
| (3)Mr. DiGregorio's 559,090 options were granted on July 25, 2008,January 28, 2011, vest pro rata quarterly over three years, and expire on June 7, 2012.January 28, 2018. |
| (2) | (4) Mr. DiGregorio was granted an aggregate of 643,623 options granted in 2009. Each of those options was 100% vested on its respective date of grant and expires three years from the date of grant. |
| (5) Mr. Dane's 35,985Sassower’s 6,500,000 options were granted on December 19, 2005, vested pro rata quarterly over three years, and expire on June 7, 2012. |
| (6) Mr. Dane's 107,958 options were granted on December 19, 2005, vested pro rata quarterly over three years, and expire on June 7, 2012. |
| (7) Mr. Dane's 100,000 options were granted on November 11, 2007, vested pro rata quarterly over three years, and expire on June 7, 2012. |
| (8) Mr. Dane's 279,545 options were granted on July 25, 2008,January 3, 2013, vest pro rata quarterly over three years, and expire on June 7, 2012.January 3, 2020. |
| (3) | Mr. Keiper's 8,000,000 options were granted on August 11, 2011, vest pro rata monthly over two years, and expire on August 11, 2018 |
| (4) | (9) Mr. Dane wasKeiper's 4,000,000 options were granted an aggregate of 263,549 options granted in 2009. Each of those options was 100% vested on its respective date of grant and expiresJanuary 3,2013, vest pro rata quarterly over three years, from the date of grant.and expire on January 3, 2020. |
| (5) | Mr. Goren's 1,000,000 options were granted on January 28, 2011, vest pro rata quarterly over three years, and expire on January 28, 2018. |
(10)(6) | AllMr. Goren's 5,000,000 options were granted will expire upon the earlier of (i) 18 months from December 7, 2010, or June 7, 2012 or (ii) the seven-year anniversary of the grant date, except for those fully vested stock options granted in lieu of salary, which options willon August 11, 2011, vest pro rata quarterly over three years, and expire on the three-year anniversary of the grant date.August 11, 2018. |
| (7) | Mr. Goren's 3,000,000 options were granted on January 3, 2013, vest pro rata quarterly over three years, and expire on January 3, 2020. |
Option Exercises and Stock Vested
There were no stock options exercised in 2010. There2013. During the twelve months ended December 31, 2012, a total of 203,456 stock options were 163,636,exercised by employees of the Company and 161,820 options to purchase stock granted to Mr. DiGregorio, and Mr. Dane, respectively, that vested during 2010. In addition Mr. DiGregorio and Mr. Dane were granted shares of restricted stockthe Company received $13 in lue of salary as part of a salary reduction plan. As of December 7, 2010, the date Mr. DiGregorio and Mr. Dane resigned as employees, Mr. DiGregorio and Mr. Dane had vested in 517,295 and 58,082 shares, respectively, of restricted stock. The Company does not grant other equity-based incentives.cash.
Director Compensation
For services as directorsThe following table provides information regarding the compensation of the Company, allCompany’s non-employee directors receive a fee of $1,000 for each board of directors meeting attended and all directors are reimbursed for all reasonable out-of-pocket expenses incurred in connection with attending such meetings.the year ended December 31, 2013:
During 2010, due to the telephonic nature of the director meetings, no director fees were paid and no stock options were issued. Name | Fees Earned or Paid in Cash(1) | Stock Awards | Option Awards | Non-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation | Non-qualified Deferred Compensation Earnings | All Other Compensation | Total |
| Current Directors | | | | | | | |
| Stanley Gilbert | $ 1,000 | $ 21,000 | $ ─ | $ ─ | $ ─ | $ ─ | $ 22,000 |
| Jeffrey Holtmeier | $ 1,000 | $ 21,000 | $ ─ | $ ─ | $ ─ | $ ─ | $ 22,000 |
| David Welch | $ 1,000 | $ 21,000 | $ ─ | $ ─ | $ ─ | $ ─ | $ 22,000 |
| (1) | The amounts provided in this column represent the fees paid for attendance at the November 18, 2013 Board of Directors Meeting and the value of Stock options awarded in 2013. |
Item 12. Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters
The following table sets forth information as of March 28, 2011,20, 2014, with respect to the beneficial ownership of (i) any person known to be the beneficial owner of more than 5% of any class of voting securities of the Company, (ii) each director and director nominee of the Company, (iii) each of the current executive officers of the Company named in the Summary Compensation Table under the heading "Executive Compensation" and (iv) all directors and executive officers of the Company as a group. Except as indicated in the footnotes to this table (i) each person has sole voting and investment power with respect to all shares attributable to such person and (ii) each person’s address is c/o Communication Intelligence Corporation, 275 Shoreline Drive, Suite 500, Redwood Shores, California 94065-1413. AllThe amounts are not stated in thousands.
| | Common Stock | | Series A-1 Preferred Stock | | Series B Preferred Stock | | Series C Preferred Stock | | Series D Preferred Stock |
Name of Beneficial Owner | Number of Shares (1) | Percent Of Class (1) | | Number of Shares (2) | Percent Of Class (2) | | Number of Shares (3) | Percent Of Class (3) | | Number of Shares (4) | Percent Of Class (4) | | Number of Shares (5) | Percent of Class (5) |
Philip S. Sassower (6) | 378,578,904 | 61.9% | | − | − | | 6,588,541 | 59.3% | | 1,992,313 | 44.2% | | 800,048 | 9.8% |
Andrea Goren (7) | 359,282,088 | 60.7% | | − | − | | 6,616,686 | 59.6% | | 1,961,302 | 43.5% | | 868,952 | 10.6% |
Stanley Gilbert (8) | 34,885,934 | 13.0% | | − | − | | 140,718 | 1.3% | | 400,232 | 8.9% | | 112,726 | 2.4% |
Jeffrey Holtmeier (9) | 2,621,570 | 1.0% | | − | − | | − | − | | − | − | | 24,821 | * |
David E. Welch (10) | 1,258,450 | * | | − | − | | − | − | | − | − | | − | − |
| William Keiper (11) | 29,547,754 | 11.2% | | − | − | | − | − | | 252,306 | 5.6% | | − | − |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| All directors and executive officers as a group (6 persons) (12) | 419,813,095 | 72.2% | | − | − | | 6,757,404 | 60.9% | | 2,659,779 | 59.0% | | 2,215,884 | 27.0% |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| 5% Shareholders | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Phoenix Venture Fund LLC (13) | 297,241,858 | 63.1% | | − | − | | 6,588,541 | 59.3% | | 1,946,374 | 43.2% | | − | − |
| Michael W. Engmann (14) | 91,324,893 | 29.0% | | 734,291 | 71.2% | | 799,688 | 7.2% | | 137,365 | 3.0% | | 878,818 | 10.7% |
| | Common Stock | | Series A-1 Preferred Stock | | Series B Preferred Stock | | Series C Preferred Stock |
Name of Beneficial Owner | Number of Shares (1) | Percent Of Class (1) | | Number of Shares (2) | Percent Of Class (2) | | Number of Shares (3) | Percent Of Class (3) | | Number of Shares (4) | Percent Of Class (4) |
Andrea Goren (5) | 304,136,996 | 70.6% | | − | − | | 4,898,965 | 58.6% | | 1,200,000 | 54.3% |
Philip S. Sassower (6) | 301,117,996 | 70.6% | | − | − | | 4,898,965 | 58.6% | | 1,200,000 | 54.3% |
Kurt Amundson (7) | 158,333 | * | | − | − | | − | | | − | − |
Francis J. Elenio (8) | 83,333 | * | | − | − | | − | − | | − | − |
David E. Welch (9) | 308,333 | * | | − | − | | − | − | | − | − |
William Keiper (10) | 8,666,666 | 4.3% | | | − | | − | − | | 97,500 | 4.2% |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
All directors and executive officers as a group (6 persons) (11) | 313,353,661 | 71.3% | | − | − | | 4,898,965 | 58.6% | | 1,297,500 | 56.2% |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| 5% Shareholders | | | | | | | | | | | |
Phoenix Venture Fund LLC (12) | 304,034,663 | 70.6% | | − | − | | 4,898,965 | 58.6% | | 1,200,000 | 52.0% |
Michael W. Engmann (13) | 68,166,292 | 25.6% | | 578,983 | 71.2% | | 1,374,077 | 16.5% | | 200,000 | 8.7% |
* Less than 1%.
| 1. | Shares of Common Stock beneficially owned and the respective percentages of beneficial ownership of Common Stock assumes the exercise or conversion of all options, warrants and other securities convertible into Common Stock, including shares of Series A-1 Convertible Preferred Stock (the “Series A-1 Preferred”), Series B Participating Convertible Preferred Stock (the “Series B Preferred”), Series C Participating Convertible Preferred Stock (the “Series C Preferred”) and Series CD Preferred Stock beneficially owned by such person or entity currently exercisable or exercisable within 60 days of March 28, 2011.20, 2014. Shares issuable pursuant to the exercise of stock options and warrants exercisable within 60 days of March 28, 2011,20, 2014, or securities convertible into Common Stock within 60 days of March 28, 201120, 2014 are deemed outstanding and held by the holder of such shares of Common Stock, options, warrants, or the other convertible securities including shares of Series A-1 Preferred Stock, Series B Preferred Stock and Series C Preferred Stock,listed above for purposes of computing the percentage of outstanding Common Stock beneficially owned by such person, but are not deemed outstanding for computing the percentage of outstanding Common Stock beneficially |
| owned by any other person. The percentage of beneficial ownership of Common Stock beneficially owned is based on 191,489,901232,559,528 shares of Common Stock, 813,3111,031,476 shares of Series A-1 Preferred Stock, 8,380,54711,102,924 shares of Series B Preferred Stock, and 2,308,0004,507,960 shares of Series C Preferred Stock, 8,198,779 shares of Series D Preferred Stock outstanding as of March 28, 2011.20, 2014. The shares of Common Stock beneficially owned and the respective percentages of beneficial ownership of Common Stock stated in these columns assume conversion of shares of Series A-1 Preferred Stock, Series B Preferred Stock, Series C Preferred Stock and Series CD Preferred Stock. |
| 2. | Each outstanding share of Series A-1 Preferred Stock is presently convertible into 7.1429 shares of Common Stock. The shares of Series A-1 Preferred Stock beneficially owned and the respective percentages of beneficial ownership of Series A-1 Preferred Stock stated in these columns reflect ownership of shares of Series A-1 Preferred Stock, and not shares of Common Stock issuable upon conversion of shares of Series A-1 Preferred Stock at this ratio. The percentage of beneficial ownership of Series A-1 Preferred Stock beneficially owned is based on 813,3111,031,476 shares of Series A-1 Preferred Stock outstanding as of March 28, 2011.20, 2014. |
| 3. | Each outstanding share of Series B Preferred Stock is presently convertible into 23.0947 shares of Common Stock. The shares of Series B Preferred Stock beneficially owned and the respective percentages of beneficial ownership of Series B Preferred Stock stated in these columns reflect ownership of shares of Series B Preferred Stock, and not shares of Common Stock issuable upon conversion of shares of Series B Preferred Stock at this ratio. The percentage of beneficial ownership of Series B Preferred Stock beneficially owned is based on 8,380,54711,102,924 shares of Series B Preferred Stock outstanding as of March 28, 2011.20, 2014. |
| 4. | Each outstanding share of Series C Preferred Stock is presently convertible into 44.444 shares of Common Stock. The shares of Series C Preferred Stock beneficially owned and the respective percentages of beneficial ownership of Series C Preferred Stock stated in these columns reflect ownership of shares of Series C Preferred Stock, and not shares of Common Stock issuable upon conversion of shares of Series C Preferred Stock at this ratio. The percentage of beneficial ownership of Series C Preferred Stock beneficially owned is based on 2,308,0004,507,960 shares of Series C Preferred Stock outstanding as of March 28, 2011.20, 2014. |
| 5. | IncludesEach share of Series D-1 Preferred Stock is presently convertible into 44.444 shares of Common Stock and each share of Series D-2 Preferred Stock is presently convertible into 20.000 shares of Common Stock. There are presently 3,414,729 shares of Series D-1 Preferred Stock, and 4,784,050 shares of Series D-2 Preferred Stock. The shares of Series D Preferred Stock beneficially owned and the respective percentages of beneficial ownership of Series D Preferred Stock stated in these columns reflect ownership of shares of Series D Preferred Stock, and not shares of Common Stock issuable upon conversion of shares of Series D Preferred Stock at the above ratios. The percentage of beneficial ownership of Series D Preferred Stock beneficially owned is based on 8,198,779 shares of Series D Preferred Stock outstanding as of March 20, 2014. |
| 6. | Represents (a) 61,131,610 shares of Common Stock, (b) 2,543,649 shares issuable to Mr. Sassower upon the exercise of options exercisable within 60 days of March 20, 2014, (c) 152,160,378 shares of Common Stock issuable upon the conversion of 6,588,541 shares of Series B Preferred Stock, (d) 88,547,156 share of Common Stock issuable upon the conversion of 1,946,374 shares of Series C Preferred Stock, (e) 56,548,965 shares of Common Stock issuable upon the conversion of 1,314,477 shares of Series D Preferred Stock and (f) 17,737,144 shares of Common Stock issuable upon the exercise of warrants (see table below for details), including securities beneficially owned by Phoenix.Phoenix, SG Phoenix Ventures LLC, SG Phoenix LLC, Phoenix Banner Holdings LLC and Phoenix Enterprises Family Fund. Please see footnote 1213 below for information concerning shares of Common Stock beneficially owned by Phoenix. Along with Mr. Goren, Mr. Sassower is the co-manager of SG Phoenix Ventures LLC, which has the shared power to vote and dispose of the shares of Common Stock held by Phoenix and Phoenix Banner Holdings LLC, and, accordingly, Mr. Sassower may be deemed to be the beneficial owner of the shares owned by Phoenix.Phoenix and Phoenix Banner Holdings LLC. SG Phoenix Ventures LLC, Mr. Goren and Mr. Sassower each disclaim beneficial ownership of |
| the shares owned by Phoenix and Phoenix Banner Holdings LLC, except to the extent of their respective pecuniary interests therein. Mr. Sassower’s address is 110 East 59th Street, Suite 1901, New York, NY 10022. |
| | Philip Sassower | SG Phoenix Ventures LLC | SG Phoenix LLC | Phoenix Venture Fund | Phoenix Enterprises Family Fund LLC | Phoenix Banner Holdings | Total |
| Common Shares | 2,555,556 | | 2,792,494 | 55,783,562 | | | 61,131,612 |
| Stock Options | 2,543,649 | | | | | | 2,543,649 |
| Series B Preferred Stock As If Converted to Common Stock | | | | 152,160,378 | | | 152,160,378 |
| Series C Preferred Stock As If Converted to Common Stock | | | | 86,505,425 | 2,041,731 | | 88,547,156 |
| Series D Preferred Stock As If Converted to Common Stock | 20,901,312 | | | | | 35,557,653 | 56,458,965 |
| Warrants | 3,223,786 | 2,425,000 | | ─ | ─ | 12,088,358 | 17,737,144 |
| Total | 29,224,303 | 2,425,000 | 2,792,494 | 294,449,365 | 2,041,731 | 47,646,011 | 378,578,904 |
6.7. | IncludesRepresents (a) 58,595,056 shares of Common Stock, (b) 6,834,199 shares issuable upon the exercise of options exercisable within 60 days of March 20, 2014, (c) 152,810,378 shares of Common Stock issuable upon the conversion of 6,616,686 shares of Series B Preferred Stock, (d) 87,168,891 shares of Common Stock issuable upon the conversion of 1,961,302 shares of Series C Preferred Stock, (e) 38,704,650 shares of Common Stock issuable upon the conversion of 873,182 shares of Series D-1 Preferred Stock and (f) 15,168,914 shares of Common Stock issuable upon the exercise of warrants (see table below for details), including securities beneficially owned by Phoenix.Phoenix, SG Phoenix Ventures LLC, SG Phoenix LLC, Phoenix Banner Holdings LLC, Andax LLC and Mr. Goren. Please see footnote 1213 below for information concerning Phoenix’s beneficial ownership. Mr. Goren is managing member Andax LLC and disclaims beneficial ownership of the shares except to the extent of Common Stock beneficially owned by Phoenix.his pecuniary interest therein. Along with Mr. Sassower, Mr. Goren is the co-manager of SG Phoenix Ventures LLC, which has the shared power to vote and dispose of the shares of Common Stock held by Phoenix and by Phoenix Banner Holdings LLC, and accordingly, Mr. Goren may be deemed to be the beneficial owner of the shares owned by Phoenix.Phoenix and Phoenix Banner Holdings LLC. SG Phoenix Ventures LLC, Mr. Goren and Mr. Sassower each disclaim beneficial ownership of the shares owned by Phoenix and Phoenix Banner Holdings LLC, except to the extent of their respective pecuniary interests therein. In addition to the shares beneficially owned by Phoenix, Mr. Goren beneficially owns 19,000 shares of Common Stock. Mr. Goren’s address is 110 East 59th Street, Suite 1901, New York, NY 10022. |
| | Andrea Goren | Andax, LLC | SG Phoenix Ventures LLC | SG Phoenix LLC | Phoenix Venture Fund | Phoenix Banner Holdings | Total |
| Common Shares | 19,000 | | 2,792,494 | 55,783,562 | | | 58,595,056 |
| Stock Options | 6,834,199 | | | | | | 6,834,199 |
| Series B Preferred Stock As If Converted to Common Stock | | 650,000 | | | 152,160,378 | | 152,810,378 |
| Series C Preferred Stock As If Converted to Common Stock | | 663,466 | | | 86,505,425 | | 87,168,891 |
| Series D Preferred Stock As If Converted to Common Stock | | 3,146,997 | | | | 35,557,653 | 38,704,650 |
| Warrants | | 655,556 | | 2,425,000 | ─ | 12,088,358 | 15,168,914 |
| Total | 6,853,199 | 5,116,019 | 2,792,494 | 58,208,562 | 238,665,803 | 47,646,011 | 359,282,088 |
7.8. | Represents 158,333(a) 9,976,813 shares of Common Stock, (b) 1,041,850 shares of Common Stock issuable upon the exercise of options exercisable within 60 days hereof.of March 20, 2014, (c) 3,249,840 shares of Common Stock issuable upon the conversion of 140,718 shares of Series B Preferred Stock, and (d) 17,787,911 shares of Common Stock issuable upon the conversion of 400,232 shares of Series C Preferred Stock, (e) 2,254,520 shares of Common Stock issuable upon the conversion of 112,726 shares of Series D Preferred Stock, and (f) 575,000 shares of Common Stock issuable upon the exercise of warrants, (see table below for details) (d). As manager of Galaxy LLC, Mr. Gilbert has the power to vote and dispose of the shares of Common Stock held by Galaxy LLC, and, accordingly, Mr. Gilbert may be deemed to be the beneficial owner of the shares owned by Galaxy LLC. |
| | Stanley Gilbert | Stanley Gilbert PC | Galaxy LLC | Mrs. Gilbert | Total |
| Common Shares | 6,018,176 | 28,485 | 1,783,035 | 2,147,117 | 9,976,813 |
| Stock Options | 1,041,850 | | | | 1,041,850 |
| Series B Preferred Stock As If Converted to Common Stock | 3,249,840 | | | | 3,249,840 |
| Series C Preferred Stock As If Converted to Common Stock | 17,787,911 | | | | 17,787,911 |
| Series D Preferred Stock As If Converted to Common Stock | 2,254,520 | | | | 2,254,520 |
| Warrants | 575,000 | | | | 575,000 |
| Total | 30,927,297 | 28,485 | 1,783,035 | 2,147,117 | 34,885,934 |
8.9. | Represents 83,333(a) 1,125,150 shares of Common Stock issuable upon the exercise of options exercisable within 60 days hereof.of March 20, 2013, (b) 496,420 shares of Common Stock issuable upon the conversion of 24,821 shares of Series D Preferred Stock owned by Genext, LLC (“Genext”) and (c) 1,000,000 shares of Common Stock issuable upon the exercise of warrants exercisable within 60 days of March 20, 2014 beneficially owned by China U.S. Business Development, LLC (“CUBD”). As manager of CUBD and Genext, Mr. Holtmeier has the power to vote and dispose of the shares of Common Stock held by CUBD and Genext, and, accordingly, Mr. Holtmeier may be deemed to be the beneficial owner of the shares owned by CUBD and Genext. |
9.10. | Represents 308,3331,258,450 shares of Common Stock issuable upon the exercise of options exercisable within 60 days hereof.of March 20, 2014. |
10.11. | Represents (a) 4,333,3339,667,599 shares of Common Stock issuable upon the exercise of options exercisable within 60 days of March 20, 2014, (b) 11,213,488 shares issuable upon the conversion of 97,500252,306 shares of Series C Preferred Stock, and (b)(c) an aggregate of 4,333,3338,666,667 shares of Common Stock issuable upon exercise of warrants exercisable within 60 days hereofof March 20, 2014 beneficially owned by FirstGlobal Partners LLC (“FirstGlobal”). Mr. Keiper is theAs manager of FirstGlobal, whichMr. Keiper has the power to vote and dispose of the shares of Common Stock held by FirstGlobal and, accordingly, Mr. Keiper may be deemed to be the beneficial owner of the shares owned by FirstGlobal. |
11.12. | Includes shares of Common Stock beneficially owned by Phoenix. Please see footnote 1213 below for information concerning shares of Common Stock beneficially owned by Phoenix. Mr. Sassower and Mr. Goren are the co-managers of SG Phoenix Ventures LLC, which has the shared power to vote and dispose of the shares of Common Stock held by Phoenix and, accordingly, Mr. Sassower and Mr. Goren may be deemed to be the beneficial owner of the shares owned by Phoenix. SG Phoenix Ventures LLC, Mr. Sassower and Mr. Goren each disclaim beneficial ownership of the shares owned by Phoenix, except to the extent of their respective pecuniary interests therein. The amount stated above includes 716,66522,470,897 shares issuable upon the exercise of options within 60 days of March 28, 2011.20, 2014. |
12.13. | Represents (a) 62,283,625 shares held by Phoenix Venture Fund LLC ( “Phoenix”), (b) 2,792,429 shares held by SG Phoenix LLC, Phoenix’s management company and (c) 72,485,207 shares issuable upon the exercise of warrants, 113,140,069 shares issuable upon the conversion of 4,898,965 shares of Series B Preferred stock and 53,333,333 shares issuable upon the exercise of 1,200,000 shares of Series C Preferred Stock. SG Phoenix Ventures LLC is the Managing Member of Phoenix, with the power to vote and dispose of the shares of Common Stock held by Phoenix. Accordingly, SG Phoenix Ventures LLC may be deemed to be the beneficial owner of such shares. Andrea Goren is the co-manager of SG Phoenix Ventures LLC, has the shared power to vote and dispose of the shares of Common Stock held by Phoenix and, as such, may be deemed to be the beneficial owner of the common shares owned by Phoenix and by SG Phoenix LLC, of which he is a member. Philip Sassower is the co-manager of SG Phoenix Ventures LLC, has the shared power to vote and dispose of the shares of Common Stock held by Phoenix and, as such, may be |
| deemed to be the beneficial owner of the common shares owned by Phoenix and by SG Phoenix LLC, of which he is a member. SG Phoenix Ventures LLC, Mr. Goren and Mr. Sassower each disclaim beneficial ownership of the shares owned by Phoenix, and Mr. Goren and Mr. Sassower each disclaim beneficial ownership of the shares owned by SG Phoenix LLC, except to the extent of their respective pecuniary interests therein. The address of these stockholders is 110 East 59th Street, Suite 1901, New York, NY 10022. |
| | Phoenix Venture Fund LLC | SG Phoenix Ventures LLC | Total |
| Common Shares | 55,783,562 | 2,792,492 | 58,576,054 |
| Stock Options | - | | |
| Series B Preferred Stock As If Converted to Common Stock | 152,160,378 | | 152,160,378 |
| Series C Preferred Stock As If Converted to Common Stock | 86,505,425 | | 86,505,425 |
| Series D Preferred Stock As If Converted to Common Stock | - | | |
| Warrants | ─ | 2,425,000 | 2,425,000 |
| Total | 297,241,858 | 5,217,492 | 299,666,857 |
13.14. | Represents (a) 5,956,1978,964,953 shares of Common Stock beneficially owned by Mr. Engmann, of which 743,128 are held by MDNH Partners, L.P. and 1,171,617 are held by KENDU Partners Company, (b) an aggregate of 22,158,341 shares issuable upon exercise of warrants beneficially owned by Mr. Engmann, of which 10,630,772 are held by MDNH Partners, L.P. and 150,435 are held by KENDU Partners Company, (c) 4,135,5935,244,967 shares of Common Stock issuable upon the conversion of 734,291 shares of Series A-1 Preferred Stock beneficially owned by Mr. Engmann, of which 1,255,366 are issuable to MDNH Partners, L.P. and 2,845,450 are issuable to KENDU Partners Company, (d) 31,733,880(c) 18,468,555 shares of Common Stock issuable upon the conversion of 799,688 shares of Series B Preferred Stock beneficially owned by Mr. Engmann of which 7,362,286 are issuable to MDNH Partners, L.P. and 2,642,379 are issuable to KENDU Partners Company; and (e) 8,888,888(d) 6,105,104 shares of Common Stock issuable upon the conversion of 137,365 shares of Series C Preferred Stock beneficially owned by Mr. Engmann and (e) 31,751,767 shares of which 4,444,444 areCommon Stock issuable to MDNH Partners, L.P.upon the conversion of 878,818 shares of Series D Preferred Stock beneficially owned by Mr. Engmann and (f) an aggregate of 20,789,547 shares of Common Stock issuable upon exercise of warrants exercisable within 60 days of March 20, 2014 beneficially owned by Mr. Engmann. See the following table for more detail. Mr. Engmann’s address is 220 Bush Street, No. 660, San Francisco, CA 94104. (See note 5 to the Consolidated Financial Statements). |
| | Michael Engmann | MDNH Partners, LP | KENDU Partners Company | Total |
| Common Shares | 3,680,249 | 4,041,140 | 1,243,564 | 8,964,953 |
| Stock Options | | | | |
| Series A-1 Preferred Stock As If Converted to Common Stock | 44,143 | 1,592,081 | 3,608,743 | 5,244,967 |
| Series B Preferred Stock As If Converted to Common Stock | 5,013,421 | 9,901,437 | 3,553,697 | 18,468,555 |
| Series C Preferred Stock As If Converted to Common Stock | 127,777 | 5,977,327 | - | 6,105,104 |
| Series D Preferred Stock As If Converted to Common Stock | 22,382,838 | - | 9,368,929 | 31,751,767 |
| Warrants | 14,276,299 | - | 6,513,248 | 20,789,547 |
| Total | 45,524,727 | 21,511,985 | 24,288,181 | 91,324,893 |
Equity Compensation Plan Information
The following table provides information as of December 31, 2010,2013, regarding our compensation plans (including individual compensation arrangements) under which equity securities are authorized for issuance:
| | | Number of Securities To Be Issued Upon Exercise of Outstanding Options, Warrants and Rights | | | Weighted-Average Exercise Price Of Outstanding Options, Warrants and Rights | | | Number of Securities Remaining Available For Future Issuance Under Equity Compensation Plans | | Number of Securities To Be Issued Upon Exercise of Outstanding Options and Rights | Weighted-Average Exercise Price Of Outstanding Options and Rights | Number of Securities Remaining Available For Future Issuance Under Equity Compensation Plans |
| Equity Compensation Plans Approved by Security Holders | | | | | | | | | | |
1999 Stock Option Plan | | | 2,154 | | | $ | 0.61 | | | | − | | 175 | $ 0.21 | − |
| | | |
2011 Stock Compensation Plan | | 68,813 | $ 0.05 | 31,125 |
Equity Compensation Plans Not Approved by Security Holders | | | 7,874 | | | $ | 0.26 | | | | 3,182 | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
2009 Stock Compensation Plan | | 425 | 0.11 | 6,502 |
Non Plan Stock Options | | 125 | 0.15 | − |
| Total: | | | 10,028 | | | $ | 0.38 | | | | 3,182 | | 69,538 | $ 0.05 | 37,627 |
Item 13. Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence
Procedures for Approval of Related Person Transactions
In accordance with our Code of Business Conduct and Ethics, we submit all proposed transactions involving our officers and directors and related parties, and other transactions involving conflicts of interest, to the Board of Directors or the Audit Committee for approval. Each of the related party transactions listed below that were submitted to our board were approved by a disinterested majority of our Board of Directors after full disclosure of the interest of the related party in the transaction.
Director Independence
The Board of Directors has determined that Messrs. Amundson, ElenioGilbert, Holtmeier, and Welch are “independent,” as defined under and required by the federal securities laws and the rules of the NASDAQ Stock Market.Market relating to director independence, and Messrs. Sassower and Goren are not independent under such rules. Messrs. Welch, Gilbert, and Holtmeier serve on the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors. Each of the members of the Compensation Committee is independent under the rules of the NASDAQ Stock Market relating to director independence. Messrs. Welch, Gilbert and Holtmeier serve on the Audit Committee of the Board of Directors. Under the applicable rules of the NASDAQ Stock Market and the SEC relating to independence of Audit Committee members, the Board of Directors has determined that Messrs. Welch and Gilbert are independent and Mr. Holtmeier is not. Mr. Holtmeier's lack of independence stems solely from the fact that he was party to a consulting agreement under which he was paid $15,000 in the year ended December 31, 2012. The Board has determined that the amount paid to Mr. Holtmeier under this contract is not material, and thus the Board determined that Mr. Holtmeier is suitable to serve on the Audit Committee.
Related Party Transactions
Phoenix Venture Fund LLC (“Phoenix”) is the beneficial owner of approximately 70.6%63.3% of the Common Stock of the Company when calculated in accordance with Rule 13d-3, and Michael W. Engmann, together with two affiliated entities, is the beneficial owner of approximately 25.6%24.0% of the Common Stock of the Company when calculated in accordance with Rule 13d-3.
On April 26, 2010, the Company entered into a letter agreement (the “Phoenix Letter”) with Phoenix and SG Phoenix LLC, an affiliated entity of Phoenix, and a term sheet relating to certain bridge financing described below, the Recapitalization, and the Series B Financing. Under the Phoenix Letter, the Company agreed to pay SG Phoenix LLC an administrative fee as follows: $20,000 upon execution and delivery of the Phoenix Letter and an additional amount equal to 2% of the new capital invested or arranged by Phoenix in the offering of Series B Preferred Stock at the closing of such offering. In addition, the Company agreed to issue to SG Phoenix LLC three-year warrants to purchase shares of Common Stock at an exercise price of $0.06 per share. The number of warrant shares was determined by dividing 3% of the sum of the indebtedness converted in the recapitalization and the new capital raised in the offering by $0.06. The Company also agreed to indemnify Phoenix and SG Phoenix for breaches of the Phoenix Letter.
On May 4, 2010,In February 2012, for working capital purposes, the Company borrowed $25 from Phoenix in the form of an unsecured demand note carrying 10% interest per annum. This note in plus accrued interest was repaid in September 2012.
In March 2012, the Company borrowed an aggregate of $100 from Phoenix Banner Holdings LLC in the form of an unsecured demand note. This note had an interest rate of 10% per annum. The funds were used for working capital purposes. The note plus accrued interest was repaid in September 2012.
In April 2012, the Company entered into a second amendmentthe April 2012 Purchase Agreement with the April 2011 Investors, which April 2011 Investors included Genext, LLC (”Genext”). Jeffrey Holtmeier is the managing member of Genext. Mr. Holtmeier was appointed to the CreditCompany’s board of directors on August 11, 2011. Under the terms of the April 2012 Purchase Agreement, dated June 5, 2008 (‘‘Amendment No. 2the Company issued the April 2012 Notes to the Credit Agreement’’). Under Amendment No. 2April 2012 Investors. The April 2012 Notes bore interest at the rate of 10% per annum and had a maturity date of December 20, 2012. The December 2012 Notes were convertible at the option of the April 2012 Investors into securities sold in the Company’s next equity financing with gross proceeds to the Credit Agreement, until August 31, 2010, upon submissionCompany in excess of a written request by the Company and the approval of Phoenix in its sole discretion, the Company had the ability to receive up to an aggregate of $1.0 million in additional funding through the issuance of additional secured promissory notes to Phoenix and/or its designees.$100. In connection with the issuance of any additional secured promissory notes to Phoenix and/or its designees,the April 2012 Notes, the Company was obligatedalso issued to issuethe April 2012 Investors warrants to purchase an aggregate of 5,000 shares of Common Stock. Under Amendment No. 2 to the Credit Agreement the Company had received an aggregate amount of $960 and issued and issued promissory notes therefore. The Company also issued warrants to purchase 16,000 shares ofCompany’s Common Stock at an exercise price of $0.06$0.05 per share. The Company ascribed a value of $47 to these warrants, which was recorded as a discount to short-term debt in the balance sheet.
In August and September 2012, the Company borrowed an aggregate of $50 and $50, respectively, from Phoenix Banner Holdings LLC in the form of unsecured demand notes. These notes had an interest rate of 10% per annum. The funds were used for working capital purposes. These notes plus accrued interest were repaid in November 2012.
In September 2012 and November 2012, the Company paid to SG Phoenix LLC, $75 and $75, respectively, for administrative fees related to the Series D Preferred Stock financing rounds.
In October 2012, the Company signed an amendment to its agreement with China-US Business Development Corporation (“CUBD”), dated July 2011, to provide certain advisory and consulting services in relation to expanding distribution for certain CIC products in the People’s Republic of China. Specifically, introductions to targeted IT service companies, as well as facilitating meetings and assistance in negotiations for prospective partnerships. Per the agreement and amendment, CUBD was paid a total of $35 in installments, in part based upon reaching certain milestones. In addition, CUBD is entitled to receive a performance fee equal to 7%of net revenue received from any customer and/or partners introduced by CUBD during the first year, and, thereafter, 5% of net revenue up to $2 million and 3% of net revenue above $2 million, all from customers and/or partners introduced by CUBD. Jeffrey Holtmeier is the managing member of CUBD.
In April 2013, the Company borrowed $250 in the form of a demand note from Phoenix Banner Holdings LLC, with an interest rate of 10% per annum. This amount plus $2 in accrued interest was repaid out the May 2013 private placement of Series D Preferred Stock.
In the May 2013 private placement of Series D Preferred Stock, the Company received $100 and $11 from Mr. Sassower and Andax LLC, respectively, issuing 20 and 2.2 May 2013 Units, respectively. The shares of Series D Preferred Stock from this investment were exchanged by Mr. Sassower and Andax LLC for Units in the December 31, 2013 financing round.
From August 2013 through December 2013 the Company secured $1,025 in 10% demand notes from related parties. In November 2013, the Board of Directors approved the issuance of warrants in connection with Amendment No. 2approved issuances of demand notes. The Company issued a total of 19,167 warrants to related parties along with the demand notes. At December 31, 2013 accrued interest associated with the above notes was approximately $27. Detail on these demand note and warrant issuances is as follows:
| Date | Phoenix Banner Holdings LLC | Michael W. Engmann | Kendu Partners Company | Philip Sassower |
| Note Amount | Warrants | Note Amount | Warrants | Note Amount | Warrants | Note Amount | Warrants |
| 8/2/2013 | $250 | | | | | | | |
| 9/3/2013 | | | | | $250 | | | |
| 9/27/2013 | | | $250 | | | | | |
| 11/6/2013 | | 4,167 | | 4,167 | | 4,167 | | |
| | | | | | | | | |
| 12/3/2013 | | | $150 | 5000 | | | | |
| 12/17/2013 | | | | | | | $125 | 2,083 |
| | | | | | | | | |
| Total | $250 | 4,167 | $400 | 9,167 | $250 | 4,167 | $125 | 2,083 |
In November 2013, the Company borrowed an additional $60 in demand notes from an employee of the Company. The notes plus accrued interest of $1 were repaid at December 31, 2013 from financing proceeds.
In the December 2013 private placement of Series D Preferred Stock, the related parties listed in the above table converted their demand notes and most of the accrued interest into Units. As a result, the Company issued 260, 258, 407 and 125 shares of Series D Preferred Stock, as well as 2,366, 2,346, 3,708 and 1,140 warrants to purchase Company Common Stock, to Phoenix Banner Holdings LLC, Kendu Partners Company, Michael W. Engmann and Philip Sassower, respectively.
SG Phoenix LLC, a Phoenix affiliate, acted as administrative agent with respect to the Credit Agreement,aforementioned demand and preferred stock offerings. Philip Sassower and Andrea Goren are the co-managers of SG Phoenix LLC, and are also the Company’s Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, respectively. Mr. Sassower is Chairman of the Board of Directors, and Mr. Goren is also a member of the Company’s Board of Directors and the Company’s Corporate Secretary. The Company also entered intoagreed to pay all legal fees and out-of-pocket expenses incurred by SG Phoenix LLC and its affiliates in connection with the aforementioned offerings. In addition and in connection to such offerings, SG Phoenix LLC was paid a second amendmentcash administrative fee equal to $150 and issued three-year warrants to purchase 3,000 shares of the Registration Rights Agreement dated June 5, 2008 in order to provide for certain registration rightsCommon Stock at a $0.05 exercise price for the offerings in 2012, and an additional $75 in cash plus a similar warrant to purchase an additional 3,000 shares of Common Stock issuable upon exercise of the warrants issuable under Amendment No. 2 to the Credit Agreement.
On June 21, 2010, in order to effect the Recapitalization, the Company entered into an Exchange Agreement and related documents with its two principal stockholders, Phoenix and Mr. Engmann, and other holders of the Company’s outstanding senior secured indebtedness. Pursuant to the Exchange Agreement, dated June 21, 2010, the Company and such parties agreed, subject to the terms thereof, that Phoenix, Mr. Engmann and other holders of senior secured indebtedness would exchange all of the Company’s outstanding senior secured indebtedness under the Credit Agreement into shares of Series B Preferred Stock at an exchange price of $1.00 per share.
On June 21, 2010, in connection with the Series B Financing, the Company also entered into the Series B Purchase Agreement with Phoenix and other investors. Pursuant to the Series B Purchase Agreement, the Company and the investors agreed, subject to the terms thereof, that the Company would issue and sell and the investors would purchase for cash in a private placement 1,440 additional shares of Series B Preferred Stock at a purchase price of $1.00 per share. Subject to the terms of the Series B Purchase Agreement, Phoenix agreed to purchase 600 shares of Series B Preferred Stock and Mr. Engmann and an affiliated entity agreed to purchase an aggregate of 300 shares of Series B Preferred Stock.
On August 5, 2010, the Company consummated both the Recapitalization and the Series B Financing.
On December 9, 2010, the Company entered into a Securities Purchase Agreement with Phoenix, Mr. Engmann and other investors. Pursuant to the Securities Purchase Agreement, the Company and the investors agreed, subject to the terms thereof, that the Company would issue and sell and the investors would purchase for cash in a private placement shares of Series C Preferred Stock at a purchase price of $1.00 per share. Subject to the terms of the Securities Purchase Agreement, Phoenix agreed to purchase 1,200 shares of Series C Preferred Stock and Mr. Engmann and one of his affiliated entities agreed to purchase an aggregate of 200 shares of Series C Preferred Stock. Under the terms of the Securities Purchase Agreement, Phoenix was to be issued at closing warrants to purchase 53,333 shares of Common Stock and Mr. Engmann and one of his affiliated entities was to be issued at closing warrants to purchase an aggregate of 8,889 shares of Common Stock. The exercise price of these warrants is $0.0225 per share. The Series C Preferred Stock issued in connection with the Financing was to be convertible into Common Stock at an initial conversion price of $0.0225 per share. The conversion price of the Series C Preferred Stock and the$0.0275 exercise price for the Warrants were negotiated between the Company and Phoenix on behalf of the Investors.
On December 31, 2010, the Company issued 2,211 shares of Series C Preferred Stock and issued warrants to purchase an aggregate of 98,244 shares of Common Stock. Phoenix and Mr. Engmann invested the amounts and were issued the shares of Series C Preferred Stock and warrants to purchase Common Stock described above.offerings in 2013.
During the year ended December 31, 20102013, the Company paid interestexercised its option to made preferred dividend payments in kind by issuing noteskind. For the year ended December 31, 2013, the Company issued 79 shares of approximately $283Series A-1 Preferred Stock, of which 56 were to related parties, 1,044 shares of Series B Preferred Stock, of which 711 were to related parties, 433 shares of Series C Preferred Stock, of which 225 were to related parties, 131 shares of Series D-1 Preferred Stock, of which 113 were to related parties, and $51402 shares of Series D-2 Preferred Stock, of which 35 were to Phoenixrelated parties.
Interest expense associated with the Company’s indebtedness for the years ended December 31, 2013 and Mr. Engmann, respectively. (See Note 32012, was $436 and $189, respectively, of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statementswhich $436 and $100, respectively, was related party expense. Amortization of debt discount and deferred financing costs and the loss on page F-17extinguishment of debt for additional details.)the year ended December 31, 2013 and 2012, was $111 and $64, respectively, of which $111 and $14, respectively, was related party expense.
Item 14. Principal Accounting Fees and Services
Audit and other Fees. GHP Horwath, P.C.PMB Helin Donovan has been the Company’s auditors since September 2006.May 2011. During fiscal years 20102012 and 2009,2013, the estimated fees for audit and other services performed by GHP HorwathPMB Helin Donovan for the Company were as follows:
| | Amount and percentage of fees | |
| Nature of Services | 2010 | | 2009 | |
| | | | | | |
| Nature of Service | | | 2013 | | | 2012 | |
| Audit Fees | Audit fees are expected to be | $ 109,000 (76%) | | Audit Fees | $ 103,300(72%) | | $ | 94,800 | (91%) | | $ | 71,000 | (86%) |
| Audit-Related Fees | | $ 25,000 (18%) | | Audit-Related fees | $ 29,400(20%) | | $ | 1,900 | (2%) | | $ | 5,300 | (6%) |
| Tax Fees | Tax fees are expected to be | $ 9,000 (6%) | | Tax Fees | $ 12,000( 8%) | | $ | 7,500 | (8%) | | $ | 7,000 | (8%) |
| All Other Fees | | $ − | | All Other Fees | $ − | | $ | − | | | $ | − | |
| Total | | $ 143,000 | | Total | $ 144,700 | | $ | 101,200 | | | $ | 83,000 | |
Pre-Approval Policies.
It is the policy of the Company not to enter into any agreement with its auditors to provide any non-audit services unless (a) the agreement is approved in advance by the Audit Committee or (b) (i) the aggregate amount of all such non-audit services constitutes no more than 5% of the total amount the Company pays to the auditors during the fiscal year in which such services are rendered, (ii) such services were not recognized by the Company as constituting non-audit services at the time of the engagement of the non-audit services and (iii) such services are promptly brought to the attention of the Audit Committee and prior to the completion of the audit are approved by the Audit Committee or by one or more members of the Audit Committee who are members of the board of directors to whom authority to grant such approvals has been delegated by the Audit Committee. The Audit Committee will not approve any agreement in advance for non-audit services unless (x) the procedures and policies are detailed in advance as to such services, (y) the Audit Committee is informed of such services prior to commencement and (z) such policies and procedures do not constitute delegation of the Audit Committee’s responsibilities to management under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.Act.
The Audit Committee has considered whether the provision of non-audit services has impaired the independence of GHP Horwath, P. C.PMB Helin Donovan and has concluded that GHP Horwath, P.C.PMB Helin Donovan is independent under applicable SEC and NASDAQ rules and regulations.
PART IV
Item 15. Exhibits, Financial Statement Schedules.
(a) The following documents are filed as part of this Annual Report on Form 10-K:
(1) Financial Statements
Index to Financial Statements
| | | | Page | |
| (a)(1) | Financial Statements | | | |
| | Report of GHP Horwath, P.C., Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm | | | F-1 | |
| | Consolidated Balance Sheets at December 31, 20102013 and 20092012 | | | F-2 | |
| | Consolidated Statements of Operations for the years ended December 31, 20102013 and 20092012 | | | F-3 | |
| Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Loss for the years ended December 31, 2013 and 2012 | | | F-4 | |
| | Consolidated Statements of Changes in Stockholders' ( Deficit) Equity for the years ended December 31, 20102013 and 20092012 | F-4
| | F-5 | |
| | Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the years ended December 31, 20102013 and 20092012 | F-5 | | F-7 | |
| | Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements | F-7 | | F-9 | |
| | (2) Financial Statement Schedules |
All schedules are omitted because they are not applicable or the required information is shown in the financial statements or the notes thereto.
(3) Exhibits
The exhibits required by Item 601 of Regulation S-K are listed in paragraph (b) below.
(b) Exhibits.
The following exhibits are filed herewith or are incorporated by reference to exhibits previously filed with the SEC as indicated below:
Exhibit Number | Document |
| 3.1 | Certificate of Incorporation of the Company, as amended, incorporated herein by reference to Exhibits 3.1, 3.2, 3.3 and 3.4 to the Company's Registration Statement on Form 10 (File No. 000-19301). |
| 3.2 | Certificate of Amendment to the Company's Certificate of Incorporation (authorizing the reclassification of the Class A Common Stock and Class B Common Stock into one class of Common Stock) filed with the Delaware Secretary of State on November 1, 1991, incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 3 to Amendment 1 on Form 8 to the Company's Form 8-A (File No. 000-19301). |
| 3.3 | Certificate of Amendment to the Company’s Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation filed with the Delaware Secretary of State June 12, 1998, incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.24 to the Company’s 1998 Form 10-K filed on April 6, 1999. |
| 3.4 | By-laws of the Company adopted on October 6, 1986, incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 3.5 to the Company's Registration Statement on Form 10 (File No. 000-19301). |
| 3.5 | Certificate of Amendment to the Company’s Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation filed with the Delaware Secretary of State January 24, 2001, incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 3.5 to the Company’s Registration Statement on Form S/1 filed on December 28, 2007. |
| 3.6 | Certificate of Elimination of the Company’s Certificate of Designation of the Series A Preferred Stock filed with the Delaware Secretary of State August 17, 2001, incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 3.6 to the Company’s Registration Statement on Form S/1 filed on December 28, 2007. |
| |
| |
Exhibit
Number
| Document
|
| 3.7 | Certificate of Amendment to the Company’s Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation filed with the Delaware Secretary of State August 17, 2007, incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 3.7 to the Company’s Registration Statement on Form S/1 filed on December 28, 2007. |
| 3.8 | Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation of the Company filed with the Delaware Secretary of State on May 18, 1995, incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 3.2 to the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed on August 14, 2008. |
| 3.9 | Certificate of Designations, Powers, Preferences and Rights of the Series A Cumulative Convertible Preferred Stock filed with the Delaware Secretary of State on June 4, 2008, incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 4.23 to the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed on August 14, 2008. |
| 3.10 | Certificate of Amendment to the Company’s Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation filed with the Delaware Secretary of State on June 30, 2008, incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 3.7 to the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed on August 14, 2008. |
| 3.11 | Certificate of Designations, Powers, Preferences and Rights of the Series A-1 Cumulative Convertible Preferred Stock filed with the Delaware Secretary of State on October 30, 2008, incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 3.11 to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K filed on March 12, 2009. |
| 3.12 | Certificate of Elimination of the Company’s Series A Cumulative Convertible Preferred Stock filed with the Delaware Secretary of State on December 30, 2008, incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 3.12 to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K filed on March 12, 2009. |
| 3.13 | Certificate of Amendment to the Company’s Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation filed with the Delaware Secretary of State on June 30, 2009, incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 3.13 to the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed on August 14, 2009. |
| 3.14 | Amendment No. 1 to By-laws dated June 17, 2010, incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 3.14 to the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed on August 16, 2010. |
Exhibit Number | Document |
| 3.15 | Certificate of Amendment to the Company’s Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation filed with the Delaware Secretary of State on August 4, 2010, incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 3.15 to the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed on November 12, 2010. |
| 3.16 | Amended and Restated Certificate of Designation of Series A-1 Cumulative Convertible Preferred Stock filed with the Delaware Secretary of State on August 4, 2010, incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 3.16 to the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed on November 12, 2010. |
| 3.17 | Certificate of Designation of Series B Participating Convertible Preferred Stock filed with the Delaware Secretary of State on August 4, 2010, incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 3.17to the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed on November 12, 2010. |
*3.18 | Certificate of Amendment to Amended And Restated Certificate of Incorporation filed with the Delaware Secretary of State on December 31, 2010.2010, incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 3.18 to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K filed on March 30, 2011. |
*3.19 | Second Amended and Restated Certificate of Designation of Series A-1 Cumulative Convertible Preferred Stock filed with the Delaware Secretary of State on December 31, 2010.2010, incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 3.19 to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K filed on March 30, 2011. |
| 3.20 | Amended and Restated Certificate of Designation of Series B Participating Convertible Preferred Stock filed with the Delaware Secretary of State on December 31, 2010, incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 3.20 to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K filed on March 30, 2011. |
| 3.21 | Certificate of Designation of Series C Participating Convertible Preferred Stock filed with the Delaware Secretary of State on December 31, 2010, incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 3.21 to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K filed on March 30, 2011. |
| 3.22 | Amendment to the Amended And Restated Certificate of Designation of the Series B Participating Convertible Preferred Stock, incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.59 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed March 31, 2011. |
| 3.23 | Amendment to the Amended And Restated Certificate of Designation of the Series C Participating Convertible Preferred Stock, incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.60 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed March 31, 2011. |
| 3.24 | Certificate of Amendment to Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation filed with the Delaware Secretary of State on November 13, 2012, incorporated herein by reference to Appendix A to the Company’s Definitive Proxy Statement filed on Schedule 14A on October 22, 2012. |
*3.203.25 | Third Amended and Restated Certificate of Designation of Series A-1 Cumulative Convertible Preferred Stock filed with the Delaware Secretary of State on November 13, 2012. |
| *3.26 | Second Amended and Restated Certificate of Designation of Series B Participating Convertible Preferred Stock filed with the Delaware Secretary of State on December 31, 2010.November 13, 2012. |
*3.213.27 | Amended and Restated Certificate of Designation of Series C Participating Convertible Preferred Stock filed with the Delaware Secretary of State on November 13, 2012. |
| *3.28 | Certificate of Designation of Series D Convertible Preferred Stock filed with the Delaware Secretary of State on November 13, 2012. |
| 3.29 | Certificate of Amendment to Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation filed with the Delaware Secretary of State on December 10, 2013, incorporated herein by reference to Appendix A to the Company’s Definitive Proxy Statement filed on Schedule 14A on November 1, 2013. |
| *3.30 | Certificate of Amendment to Certificate of Designation of Series D Convertible Preferred Stock filed with the Delaware Secretary of State on December 31, 2010.2013 |
| †4.10 | 1999 Stock Option Plan, as amended, incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 4.2 to the Company's Form S-8 filed on September 19, 2008. |
| 4.11 | Form of Convertible Promissory Note issued by the Company, incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.3 to the Company's Form 8-K filed on November 3, 2004. |
| 4.12 | Form of Warrant issued by the Company, incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.4 to the Company's Form 8-K filed on November 3, 2004. |
| 4.13 | Form of Promissory Note issued by the Company, incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.36 to the Company's Form 8-K filed on August 12, 2006. |
| |
| |
Exhibit Number | Document |
| 4.14 | Form of Warrant issued by the Company, incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.37 to the Company's Form 8-K filed on August 12, 2006. |
| 4.15 | Form of Promissory Note issued by the Company, incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.36 to the Company’s Form 8-K filed on February 9, 2007. |
| 4.16 | Form of Warrant issued by the Company, incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.37 to the Company’s Form 8-K filed on February 9, 2007. |
| 4.17 | Form of Promissory Note issued by the Company, incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.36 to the Company’s Form 8-K filed on June 20, 2007. |
| 4.18 | Form of Warrant issued the Company, incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.37 to the Company’s Form 8-K filed on June 20, 2007. |
| 4.19 | Form of Common Stock Purchase Warrant issued by the Company, incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 4.19 to the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed on August 14, 2008. |
| 4.20 | Form of Additional Common Stock Purchase Warrant, incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 4.20 to the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed on August 14, 2008. |
| 4.21 | Form of Secured Promissory Note issued by the Company dated June 5, 2008, incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 4.21 to the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed on August 14, 2008. |
| 4.22 | Form of Additional Secured Promissory Note, incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 4.22 to the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed on August 14, 2008. |
| 4.23 | Certificate of Designations, Powers, Preferences and Rights of the Series A-1 Cumulative Convertible Preferred Stock filed with the Delaware Secretary of State on October 30, 2008, incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 4.23 to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K filed on March 12, 2009. |
| 4.24 | Form of Secured Promissory Note issued by the Company dated May 28, 2009, incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 4.24 to the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed on August 14, 2009. |
| 4.25 | Form of Additional Secured Promissory Note, incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 4.25 to the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed on August 14, 2009. |
| 4.26 | Form of Common Stock Purchase Warrant issued by the Company, incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 4.26 to the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed on August 14, 2009. |
| 4.27 | Form of Additional Common Stock Purchase Warrant, incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 4.27 to the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed on August 14, 2009. |
| ††10.19 | Software Development and License Agreement dated December 4, 1998 between Ericsson Mobile Communications AB and the Company incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.26 of the Company's 1998 Form 10-K (File No. 0-19301). |
| 10.24 | Form of Note and Warrant Purchase Agreement dated October 28, 2004, by and among the Company and the Purchasers identified therein, incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Company's Form 8-K filed on November 3, 2004. |
| 10.25 | Form of Registration Rights Agreement dated October 28, 2004, by and among the Company and the parties identified therein, incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to the Company's Form 8-K filed on November 3, 2004. |
| 10.26 | Form of Note and Warrant Purchase Agreement dated August 10, 2006, by and among the Company and the Purchasers identified therein, incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.34 to the Company's Form 8-K filed on August 12, 2006. |
| 10.26 | Form of Note and Warrant Purchase Agreement dated August 10, 2006, by and among the Company and the Purchasers identified therein, incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.34 to the Company's Form 8-K filed on August 12, 2006. |
| 10.27 | Form of Registration Rights Agreement dated August 10, 2006, by and among the Company and the parties identified therein, incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.35 to the Company's Form 8-K filed on August 12, 2006. |
| |
| |
Exhibit Number | Document |
| †††10.28 | Amendment dated May 31, 2005 to the License agreement dated December 22, 2000 between the Company and eCom Asia Pacific, Ltd., incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.26 of the Company’s Form 10-K/A filed on September 15, 2005. |
| †††10.29 | License agreement dated June 2, 2005 between the Company and SnapOn Credit LLC, incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.27 of the Company’s Form 10-K/A filed on September 15, 2005. |
| †10.30 | Amendment to employment agreement with Guido DiGregorio, incorporated herein by reference to the Company's Form 8-K filed on September 21, 2005. |
| †10.31 | Amendment to employment agreement with Francis V. Dane, incorporated herein by reference to the Company's Form 8-K filed on September 21, 2005. |
| †10.32 | Form of stock option agreement dated August 31, 2005 with RusselRussell L. Davis, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.30 of the Company’s Form 10-K/A filed on September 15, 2006. |
| †10.33 | Form of stock option agreement dated December 19, 2005 with Guido DiGregorio, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.30 of the Company’s Form 10-K/A filed on September 15, 2006. |
| †10.34 | Form of stock option agreement dated August 31, 2005 with Francis V. Dane, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.30 of the Company’s Form 10-K/A filed on September 15, 2006. |
| †10.35 | Form of stock option agreement dated August 31, 2005 with C. B. Sung, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.30 of the Company’s Form 10-K/A filed on September 15, 2006. |
| 10.36 | Form of Note and Warrant Purchase Agreement dated February 5, 2007, by and among the Company and the Purchasers identified therein, incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.34 to the Company's Form 8-K filed on February 5, 2007. |
| 10.37 | Form of Registration Rights Agreement dated February 5, 2007, by and among the Company and the parties identified therein, incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.35 to the Company's Form 8-K filed on February 5, 2007. |
| 10.38 | Amendment to the Note and Warrant Purchase Agreement dated February 5, 2007, by and among the Company and the parties identified therein, incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 99.1 to the Company's Form 8-K filed on March 15, 2007. |
| 10.39 | Form of Note and Warrant Purchase Agreement dated June 15, 2007, by and among the Company and the Purchasers identified therein, incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.34 to the Company's Form 8-K filed on June 15, 2007. |
| 10.40 | Form of Registration Rights Agreement dated June 15, 2007, by and among the Company and the parties identified therein, incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.35 to the Company's Form 8-K filed on June 15, 2007. |
| 10.41 | Form of Securities Purchase and Registration Rights Agreement dated August 24, 2007, by and among the Company and Phoenix Venture Fund LLC, incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.36 to the Company's Form 8-K filed on August 27, 2007. |
| †10.42 | Consulting Agreement dated January 9, 2008 between the Company and GS Meyer & Associates LLC - Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.42 to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K filed on March 12, 2007. |
| 10.43 | Credit Agreement dated June 5, 2008, by and among the Company and the Lenders Party Hereto and SG Phoenix as Collateral Agent, incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.41 to the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed on August 14, 2008. |
| 10.44 | Pledge and Security Agreement dated June 5, 2008, by and among the Company and the parties identified therein, incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.42 to the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed on August 14, 2008. |
| 10.44 | Securities Purchase Agreement dated June 5, 2008, by and among the Company and the parties identified therein, incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.43 to the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed on August 14, 2008. |
| 10.45 | Registration Rights Agreement dated June 5, 2008, by and among the Company and the parties identified therein, incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.44 to the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed on August 14, 2008. |
| | |
| |
Exhibit Number | Document |
| 10.46 | Amendment No. 1 to Credit Agreement dated May 28, 2009, by and among the Company, the Lenders and Additional Lenders Parties Hereto and SG Phoenix as Collateral Agent, incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.46 to the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed on August 14, 2009. |
| 10.47 | Amendment No. 1 to Registration Rights Agreement dated May 28, 2009, by and among the Company and the parties identified therein, incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.47 to the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed on August 14, 2009. |
| 10.48 | Salary Reduction Plan for Executive Officers of Communication Intelligence Corporation under Amendment No. 1 to Credit Agreement dated May 28, 2009, incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.48 to the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed on August 14, 2009. |
| 10.53 | Amendment No. 3 to Credit Agreement dated July 22, 2010, by and among the Company, the Lenders and Additional Lenders Parties Hereto and SG Phoenix as Collateral Agent, incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.53 to the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed on November 12, 2010. |
| 10.54 | Amendment No. 3 to Registration Rights Agreement dated July 22, 2010, by and among the Company and the parties identified therein, incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.54 to the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed on November 12, 2010. |
| 10.55 | Registration Rights Agreement dated August 5, 2010, by and among the Company and the Persons Executing the Agreement as Investors, incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.55 to the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed on November 12, 2010. |
| 10.56 | Investor Rights Agreement dated August 5, 2010, by and among the Company and Phoenix Venture Fund LLC, SG Phoenix LLC, Michael Engmann, Ronald Goodman, Kendu Partners Company and MDNH Partners L.P., incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.56 to the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed on November 12, 2010. |
| 10.57 | Securities Purchase Agreement dated December 9, 2010, by and among the Company, Phoenix Venture Fund LLC, and the Investors signatory thereto, incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.57 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on December 9, 2010. |
| 10.58 | Registration Rights Agreement dated December 31, 2010, by and among the Company and the Persons Executing the Agreement as Investors, incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.58 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on January 6, 2011. |
| 10.59 | Form of Subscription Agreement dated March 31, 2011, by and among the Company and the Person Executing the Agreement as Subscribers, incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.61 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on April 4, 2011. |
| 10.60 | Amendment No. 1 to Registration Rights Agreement dated March 31, 2011, by and among the Company and the Persons Executing the Agreement as Required Holders, incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.62 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on April 4, 2011. |
| 10.61 | Note and Warrant Purchase Agreement dated September 20, 2011, incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.61 to the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed on November 14, 2011. |
| 10.62 | Note and Warrant Purchase Agreement dated December 2, 2011, incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.62 to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K filed on March 30, 2012. |
| 10.63 | Note and Warrant Purchase Agreement dated April 23, 2012, incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.63 to the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed on August 14, 2012. |
| 10.64 | Form of Subscription Agreement dated September 14, 2012, incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.64 to the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed on November 14, 2012.. |
| 10.65 | Form of Unsecured Convertible Promissory Note dated September 14, 2012, incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.65 to the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed on November 14, 2012. |
| 10.66 | Form of Subscription Agreement dated May 17, 2013, incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.66 to the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed on August 14, 2013. |
| *10.67 | Form of Subscription Agreement dated December 31, 2013. |
| 14.1 | Code of Ethics, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 14 to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K filed on March 30, 2004. |
| |
Exhibit Number | Document |
| *21.1 | Schedule of Subsidiaries. |
| *23.1 | Consent of GHP Horwath, P.C.,PMB Helin Donovan, LLP, Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm. |
| *31.1 | Certification of Company’s Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 |
| *31.2 | Certificate of Company’s Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 |
| *32.1 | Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to 18 USC Section 1750, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 |
| *32.2 | Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to 18 USC Section 1750, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 |
| | † | Indicates management contract or compensatory plan, contract or arrangement. |
| | †† | Confidential treatment of certain portions of this exhibit have been requested from the SEC pursuant to a request for confidentiality dated March 30, 1999, filed pursuant to the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934.Act. |
| ††† | Confidential treatment of certain portions of this exhibit have been requested from the SEC pursuant to a request for confidentiality dated March 30, 2006 filed pursuant to the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934.Act. |
The exhibits listed above are filed as part of this Form 10-K other than Exhibits 32.1 and 32.2, which shall be deemed furnished.
| | (c) Financial Statement Schedules |
All financial statement schedules are omitted because the information is inapplicable or presented in the notes to the financial statements.
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned; thereunto duly authorized, in the City of Redwood Shores, State of California, on March 29, 2011.California.
| | Communication Intelligence Corporation |
| | By: | /s/ Andrea Goren Andrea Goren (Principal Financial Officer and Officer Duly Authorized to Sign on Behalf of the Registrant) |
Date: March 31, 2014
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of Registrant and in the capacities indicated on March 29, 2011.31, 2014.
| Date | Signature | Title |
| |
| March 31, 2014 | /s/ Philip S. Sassower Philip S. Sassower | Chairman and Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer) |
| March 31, 2014 | /s/ Andrea Goren Andrea Goren | Director, Acting Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial and Accounting Officer) |
| March 31, 2014 | /s/ Kurt AmundsonStanly Gilbert Kurt AmundsonStanley Gilbert
| Director |
| March 31, 2014 | /s/ Francis J. ElenioJeffrey Holtmeier Francis J. ElenioJeffrey Holtmeier
| Director |
| March 31, 2014 | /s/ David Welch David Welch | Director |
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
To the Board of Directors and
Stockholders
of Communication Intelligence Corporation and Subsidiary:
We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Communication Intelligence Corporation and its subsidiary (“Subsidiary (collectively the Company”“Company”) as of December 31, 20102013 and 2009,2012, and the related consolidated statements of operations, changes in stockholders'comprehensive loss, stockholders’ (deficit) equity, and cash flows for each of the two years in the period ended December 31, 2010.then ended. These consolidated financial statements are the responsibility of the Company'sCompany’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these consolidated financial statements based on our audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States)States of America). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audits to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the consolidated financial statements are free of material misstatement. The company is not required to have, nor were we engaged to perform, an audit of its internal control over financial reporting. Our audit included consideration of internal control over financial reporting as a basis for designing audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion. An audit also includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the consolidated financial statements. An audit also includesstatements, assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall consolidated financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Communication Intelligence Corporation and its subsidiarythe Company as of December 31, 20102013 and 2009, and2012, including the results of their operations and their cash flows for each of the two years in the periodthen ended, December 31, 2010, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.
The accompanying consolidated financial statements have been prepared assuming that the Company will continue as a going concern. As discussed in Note 1 to the consolidated financial statements, the Company’s significant recurring operating losses and accumulated deficit raise substantial doubt about its ability to continue as a going concern. Management’s plans in regard to these matters are also described in Note 1. The consolidated financial statements do not include any adjustments that might result from the outcome of this uncertainty.
As discussed in Note 4 to the consolidated financial statements, in 2009, the Company adopted a new accounting standard related to whether an equity-linked financial instrument (or embedded feature) is indexed to an entity’s stock.
/S/ GHP Horwath, P.C.
Denver, ColoradoPMB Helin Donovan, LLP
San Francisco, CA
March 29, 201131, 2014
Communication Intelligence Corporation
Consolidated Balance Sheets
(In thousands, except par value amounts)
| | | | | |
| | | December 31, | | | December 31, | |
| | | 2010 | | | 2009 | | | 2013 | | | 2012 | |
| Assets | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Current assets: | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Cash and cash equivalents | | $ | 1,879 | | | $ | 1,021 | | | $ | 945 | | | $ | 486 | |
Accounts receivable, net of allowance of $9 and $117 at December 31, 2010 and 2009, respectively | | | 103 | | | | 227 | | |
Accounts receivable, net of allowance of $22 and $27 at December 31, 2013 and 2012 | | | | 410 | | | | 701 | |
Prepaid expenses and other current assets | | | 44 | | | | 66 | | | | 57 | | | | 73 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total current assets | | | 2,026 | | | | 1,314 | | | | 1,412 | | | | 1,260 | |
Property and equipment, net | | | 26 | | | | 31 | | | | 17 | | | | 28 | |
Patents, net | | | 2,392 | | | | 2,771 | | | | 1,290 | | | | 1,655 | |
Capitalized software development costs, net | | | 452 | | | | 1,515 | | |
Deferred financing costs (Note 3) | | | – | | | | 218 | | |
Other assets | | | 29 | | | | 29 | | | | 29 | | | | 29 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total assets | | $ | 4,925 | | | $ | 5,878 | | | $ | 2,748 | | | $ | 2,972 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Liabilities and Stockholders' Equity | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Current liabilities: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Current portion of long-term debt –net of discount of $2,222, including related party debt of $4,918, net of discount of $2,138 at December 31, 2009 (Note 3) | | $ | – | | | $ | 2,869 | | |
Accounts payable | | | 450 | | | | 118 | | | | 327 | | | | 75 | |
Accrued compensation | | | 446 | | | | 327 | | | | 315 | | | | 289 | |
Other accrued liabilities | | | 159 | | | | 169 | | | | 232 | | | | 150 | |
Deferred revenue | | | 456 | | | | 458 | | | | 490 | | | | 569 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total current liabilities | | | 1,511 | | | | 3,941 | | | | 1,364 | | | | 1,083 | |
Deferred revenue long-term | | | 650 | | | | 867 | | | | 74 | | | | 249 | |
Deferred rent | | | 183 | | | | – | | | | 86 | | | | 125 | |
Derivative liability | | | 499 | | | | 422 | | | | 25 | | | | 128 | |
| Total liabilities | | | 2,843 | | | | 5,230 | | | | 1,549 | | | | 1,585 | |
| Commitments and contingencies (Note 6) | | | | | | | | | |
| Stockholders' equity: | | | | | | | | | |
Series A-1 Preferred Stock, $.01 par value; 2,000 shares authorized; 813 and 751 shares outstanding at December 31, 2010 and 2009, respectively ($813 liquidation preference at December 31, 2010) | | | 813 | | | | 751 | | |
Series B Preferred Stock, $.01 par value; 14,000 shares authorized; 8,380 shares outstanding at December 31, 2010 ($12,570 liquidation preference at December 31, 2010) | | | 6,350 | | | | – | | |
Series C Preferred Stock, $.01 par value; 4,100 shares authorized; 2,211 shares outstanding at December 31, 2010 ($3,317 liquidation preference at December 31, 2010) | | | 2,032 | | | | – | | |
Common stock, $.01 par value; 1,050,000 shares authorized; 191,489 and 190,026 shares issued and outstanding at December 31, 2010 and 2009, respectively | | | 1,915 | | | | 1,900 | | |
Additional paid-in capital | | | 98,347 | | | | 101,221 | | |
| Commitments and contingencies | | | | − | | | | − | |
| Stockholders' equity (deficit): | | | | | | | | | |
Series A-1 Preferred Stock, $.01 par value; 2,000 shares authorized; 1,031 and 953 shares issued and outstanding at December 31, 2013 and 2012, respectively ($1,031 liquidation preference at December 31, 2013) | | | | 1,031 | | | | 953 | |
Series B Preferred Stock, $.01 par value; 14,000 shares authorized; 11,102 and 10,058 shares issued and outstanding at December 31, 2013 and 2012 ($16,653 liquidation preference at December 31, 2013) | | | | 9,232 | | | | 8,188 | |
Series C Preferred Stock, $.01 par value; 9,000 shares authorized; 4,508 and 4,175 shares issued and outstanding at December 31, 2013 and 2012 ($6,762 liquidation preference at December 31, 2013) | | | | 4,895 | | | | 4,754 | |
Series D-1 Preferred Stock, $.01 par value; 6,000 shares authorized; 3,415 and 1,124 shares issued and outstanding at December 31, 2013 and 2012 ($3,415 liquidation preference at December 31, 2013) | | | | 2,357 | | | | 2,158 | |
Series D-2 Preferred Stock, $.01 par value; 9,000 shares authorized; 4,783 and 3,302 shares issued and outstanding at December 31, 2013 and 2012 ($4,783 liquidation preference at December 31, 2013) | | | | 3,934 | | | | 3,073 | |
Common stock, $.01 par value; 1,500,000 shares authorized; 232,558 and 224,523 shares issued and outstanding at December 31, 2013 and 2012, respectively | | | | 2,390 | | | | 2,309 | |
Treasury shares, 6,500 at December 31, 2013 and December 31, 2012 respectively | | | | (325 | ) | | | (325 | ) |
Additional paid-in-capital | | | | 97,419 | | | | 95,262 | |
Accumulated deficit | | | (107,337 | ) | | | (103,178 | ) | | | (119,184 | ) | | | (114,420 | ) |
Accumulated other comprehensive loss | | | (38 | ) | | | (46 | ) | | | (14 | ) | | | (29 | ) |
Total stockholders' equity | | | 2,082 | | | | 648 | | |
Total CIC stockholder’ equity | | | | 1,735 | | | | 1,923 | |
Non-Controlling interest | | | | (536 | ) | | | (536 | ) |
Total stockholders' equity (deficit) | | | | 1,199 | | | | 1,387 | |
Total liabilities and stockholders' equity | | $ | 4,925 | | | $ | 5,878 | | | $ | 2,748 | | | $ | 2,972 | |
TheSee accompanying notes form an integral part ofto these Consolidated Financial Statements
Communication Intelligence Corporation
Consolidated Statements of Operations
(In thousands, except per share amounts)
| | | Years Ended December 31, | | | Years Ended December 31, | |
| | | 2010 | | | 2009 | | | 2013 | | | 2012 | |
| Revenue: | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Product | | $ | 197 | | | $ | 1,185 | | | $ | 728 | | | $ | 1,729 | |
Maintenance | | | 654 | | | | 751 | | | | 690 | | | | 649 | |
| | | | 851 | | | | 1,936 | | | | 1,418 | | | | 2,378 | |
| Operating costs and expenses: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Cost of sales: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Product | | | 635 | | | | 724 | | | | 64 | | | | 323 | |
Maintenance | | | 244 | | | | 161 | | | | 280 | | | | 52 | |
Acceleration of amortization of certain capitalized software development costs | | | 1,009 | | | | | |
Research and development | | | 431 | | | | 343 | | | | 2,073 | | | | 1,802 | |
Sales and marketing | | | 1,531 | | | | 1,501 | | | | 1,272 | | | | 1,392 | |
General and administrative | | | 2,255 | | | | 1,977 | | | | 2,026 | | | | 1,863 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | 6,105 | | | | 4,706 | | | | 5,715 | | | | 5,432 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Loss from operations | | | (5,254 | ) | | | (2,770 | ) | | | (4,297 | ) | | | (3,054 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Interest and other (expense) income, net | | | (2 | ) | | | 2 | | |
Other expense, net | | | | (23 | ) | | | (19 | ) |
| Interest expense: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Related party (Note 3) | | | (255 | ) | | | (312 | ) | |
Other (Note 3) | | | (8 | ) | | | (43 | ) | |
Related party | | | | (436 | ) | | | (100 | ) |
Other | | | | − | | | | (89 | ) |
| Amortization of debt discount and deferred financing cost: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Related party (Note 3) | | | (1,719 | ) | | | (1,600 | ) | |
Other (Note 3) | | | (57 | ) | | | (78 | ) | |
Loss on extinguishment of long-term debt | | | – | | | | (829 | ) | |
Gain (loss) on derivative liability | | | 3,136 | | | | (5,136 | ) | |
Related party | | | | (44 | ) | | | (14 | ) |
Other | | | | | | | | (50 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | |
Loss on extinguishment of debt, related party | | | | (67 | ) | | ─ | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
Gain on derivative liability | | | | 103 | | | | 211 | |
Net loss | | | (4,159 | ) | | | (10,766 | ) | | | (4,764 | ) | | | (3,115 | ) |
| Preferred stock: | | | | | | | | | |
| Accretion of beneficial conversion feature: | | | | | | | | | |
Related party | | | | (599 | ) | | | (1,859 | ) |
Other | | | | (648 | ) | | | (334 | ) |
| Preferred stock dividends: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Related party | | | (292 | ) | | | (45 | ) | | | (1,140 | ) | | | (982 | ) |
Other | | | (102 | ) | | | (16 | ) | | | (948 | ) | | | (484 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | |
| Income tax tax expense | | | | − | | | | − | |
Net loss before non-controlling interestNet loss | | | $ | (8,099 | ) | | $ | (6,744 | ) |
Net loss attributable to non-controlling interest | | | | − | | | | (2 | ) |
| Net loss attributable to common stockholders | | $ | (4,553 | ) | | $ | (10,827 | ) | | | (8,099 | ) | | | (6,746 | ) |
Basic and diluted loss per common share | | $ | (0.02 | ) | | $ | (0.08 | ) | | $ | (0.04 | ) | | $ | (0.03 | ) |
Weighted average common shares outstanding, basic and diluted | | | 190,721 | | | | 129,247 | | | | 226,225 | | | | 223,390 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
TheSee accompanying notes form an integral part ofto these Consolidated Financial Statements
Communication Intelligence Corporation
Consolidated Statements of Changes in Stockholders' EquityComprehensive Loss
(In thousands, except per share amounts)
| | | Series A-1Preferred Shares Outstanding | | | Series A-1Preferred Shares Amount | | | Series B Preferred Shares Outstanding | | | Series B Preferred Shares Amount | | | Series C Preferred Shares Outstanding | | | Series C Preferred Shares Amount | | | Common Shares Outstanding | | | Common Stock Amount | | | Additional Paid-In Capital | | | Accumulated Deficit | | | Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss) | | | Total | |
| Balance as of December 31, 2008 | | | 856 | | | $ | 856 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 130,374 | | | $ | 1,304 | | | $ | 95,174 | | | $ | (94,569 | ) | | $ | 13 | | | $ | 2,778 | |
| Cumulative effect of change in accounting principle on January 1, 2009 – Reclassification of equity-linked financial instrument to derivative liability | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | (3,510 | ) | | | 2,157 | | | | | | | | (1,353 | ) |
| Stock-based employee compensation | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 318 | | | | | | | | | | | | 318 | |
| Conversion of preferred shares | | | (166 | ) | | | (166 | ) | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 1,183 | | | | 11 | | | | 155 | | | | | | | | | | | | − | |
| Cancellation of warrants recorded as derivative liability | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 875 | | | | | | | | | | | | 875 | |
| Exercise of stock options | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 85 | | | | 1 | | | | 7 | | | | | | | | | | | | 8 | |
| Exercise of warrants | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 58,384 | | | | 584 | | | | 8,263 | | | | | | | | | | | | 8,847 | |
| Comprehensive loss: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Net loss | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | (10,766 | ) | | | | | | | (10,766 | ) |
| Foreign currency translation adjustment | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | (59 | ) | | | (59 | ) |
| Total comprehensive (loss) | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | (10,825 | ) |
| Preferred share dividends, paid in kind | | | 61 | | | | 61 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | (61 | ) | | | | | | | | | | | − | |
| Balances as of December 31, 2009 | | | 751 | | | | 751 | | | | − | | | | − | | | | − | | | | − | | | | 190,026 | | | | 1,900 | | | | 101,221 | | | | (103,178 | ) | | | (46 | ) | | | 648 | |
| Conversion of long-term notes into Series B Preferred Shares, net of unamortized discount of $1,509 | | | | | | | | | | | 6,608 | | | $ | 6,608 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | (1,509 | ) | | | | | | | | | | | 5,099 | |
| Issuance of Series B Preferred Shares | | | | | | | | | | | 1,440 | | | | 1,440 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 1,440 | |
| Financing cost on conversion of long-term notes and issuance of Series B Preferred Shares | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | (580 | ) | | | | | | | | | | | (580 | ) |
| Conversion feature associated with the Series B Preferred Shares | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | (2,000 | ) | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | (2,000 | ) |
| Warrants issued for services | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | (153 | ) | | | | | | | | | | | (153 | ) |
| Stock based employee compensation | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 93 | | | | | | | | | | | | 93 | |
| Common stock issued for services | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 750 | | | | 8 | | | | 58 | | | | | | | | | | | | 66 | |
| Restricted common stock issued in lieu of salaries | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 713 | | | | 7 | | | | (7 | ) | | | | | | | | | | | − | |
| Restricted stock expense | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 40 | | | | | | | | | | | | 40 | |
| Issuance of Series C Preferred Shares | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2,211 | | | $ | 2,211 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2,211 | |
| Financing cost on issuance of Series C Preferred Shares | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | (422 | ) | | | | | | | | | | | (422 | ) |
| Conversion feature associated with the Series C Preferred Shares | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | (179 | ) | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | (179 | ) |
| Comprehensive loss: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Net loss | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | (4,159 | ) | | | | | | | (4,159 | ) |
| Foreign currency translation adjustment | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 8 | | | | 8 | |
| Total comprehensive loss | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | (4,151 | ) |
| Preferred share dividends | | | 62 | | | | 62 | | | | 332 | | | | 332 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | (394 | ) | | | | | | | | | | | − | |
| Conversion feature, Preferred Share dividends | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | (30 | ) | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | (30 | ) |
| Balances as of December 31, 2010 | | | 813 | | | $ | 813 | | | | 8,380 | | | $ | 6,350 | | | | 2,211 | | | $ | 2,032 | | | | 191,489 | | | $ | 1,915 | | | $ | 98,347 | | | $ | (107,337 | ) | | $ | (38 | ) | | $ | 2,082 | |
| | | Years Ended December 31, | |
| | | 2013 | | | 2012 | |
| | | | | | | |
Net loss: | | $ | (4,764 | ) | | $ | (3,115 | ) |
Other comprehensive income, net of tax | | | | | | | | |
Foreign currency translation adjustment | | | 15 | | | | 14 | |
| | | | | | | | | |
Total comprehensive loss | | $ | (4,749 | ) | | | (3,101 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | |
The
See accompanying notes form an integral part ofto these Consolidated Financial Statements
| | | Series A-1Preferred Shares Outstanding | | | Series A-1Preferred Shares Amount | | | Series B Preferred Shares Outstanding | | | Series B Preferred Shares Amount | | | Series C Preferred Shares Outstanding | | | Series C Preferred Shares Amount | | | Series D-1 Preferred Shares Outstanding | | | Series D-1 Preferred Shares Amount | | | Series D-2 Preferred Shares Outstanding | | | Series D-2 Preferred Shares Amount | | | Common Shares Outstanding | | | Common Stock Amount | | | Treasury Stock | | | Additional Paid-In Capital | | | Accumulated Deficit | | | Non-Controlling Interest | | | Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss) | | | Total | |
| Balances as of December 31, 2011 | | | 880 | | | $ | 880 | | | | 9,250 | | | $ | 7,380 | | | | 3,547 | | | $ | 3,569 | | | | - | | | $ | - | | | | - | | | $ | - | | | | 198,188 | | | $ | 1,981 | | | | − | | | $ | 97,715 | | | $ | (111,305 | ) | | $ | (534 | ) | | $ | (43 | ) | | $ | (357 | ) |
| Receipt of 6.5M common shares in settlement of the 16b action | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | (6,500 | ) | | | | | | | (325 | ) | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | (325 | ) |
| Series C preferred shares issued in settlement of an indemnification claim related to the 16b settlement | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 278 | | | | 417 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 417 | |
| Stock-based employee compensation | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 461 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 461 | |
| Common shares issued in connection with the cashless exercise of warrants | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 20,186 | | | | 202 | | | | | | | | (202 | ) | | | | | | | | | | | | | | ─- | |
| Common shares issued in connection with the exercise of warrants for cash | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 7,439 | | | | 74 | | | | | | | | 138 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 212 | |
| Common shares issued in connection with the exercise of stock options option for cash | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 203 | | | | 2 | | | | | | | | 11 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 13 | |
| Common stock issued as restricted stock | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 46 | | | | | | | | | | | | 2 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2 | |
| Common shares issued in connection with the conversion of Series B preferred shares | | | | | | | | | | | (140 | ) | | | (140 | ) | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 3,232 | | | | 33 | | | | | | | | 107 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | ─ | |
| Common shares issued in connection with the conversion of Series C preferred shares | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | (39 | ) | | | (39 | ) | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 1,729 | | | | 17 | | | | | | | | 22 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | ─ | |
| Accretion of beneficial conversion feature on Series C preferred shares issued in settlement of the indemnification claim | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 417 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | (417 | ) | | | | | | | | | | | | | | ─ | |
| Series D-1 preferred shares issued in a private placement upon the conversion of short-term debt net of offering expenses of $76 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 1,110 | | | | 1,034 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 1,034 | |
| Series D-2 preferred shares issued in a private placement upon the conversion of short-term debt, net of offering expenses of $114 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2,179 | | | | 2,065 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2,065 | |
| Series D-2 preferred shares issued in a private placement for cash, net of offering expenses of $115 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 1,082 | | | | 967 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 967 | |
| Accretion of beneficial conversion feature on Series D-1 preferred shares issued in a private placement upon the conversion of short term debt | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 1,110 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | (1,110 | ) | | | | | | | | | | | | | | ─ | |
| Accretion of beneficial conversion feature on preferred shares dividends issued in kind | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 268 | | | | | | | | 385 | | | | | | | | 13 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | (666 | ) | | | | | | | | | | | | | | ─- | |
| Preferred share dividends, paid in kind | | | 73 | | | | 73 | | | | 948 | | | | 680 | | | | 389 | | | | 4 | | | | 14 | | | | 1 | | | | 41 | | | | 41 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | (799 | ) | | | | | | | | | | | | | | ─ | |
| Net loss attributable to non-controlling interest | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | (2 | ) | | | | | | | (2 | ) |
| Comprehensive loss: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Net loss | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | (3,115 | ) | | | | | | | | | | | (3115 | ) |
| Foreign currency translation adjustment | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 14 | | | | 14 | |
| Balance as of December 31, 2012 | | | 953 | | | $ | 953 | | | | 10,058 | | | $ | 8,188 | | | | 4,175 | | | $ | 4,754 | | | | 1,124 | | | $ | 2,158 | | | | 3,302 | | | $ | 3,073 | | | | 224,523 | | | $ | 2,309 | | | $ | (325 | ) | | $ | 95,262 | | | $ | (114,420 | ) | | $ | (536 | ) | | $ | (29 | ) | | $ | 1,387 | |
| Stock-based employee compensation | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 819 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 819 | |
| Common shares issued in connection with the cashless exercise of warrants | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2,283 | | | | 23 | | | | | | | | (23 | ) | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | − | |
| Common shares issued in connection with the exercise of warrants for cash | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 1,300 | | | | 13 | | | | | | | | 16 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 29 | |
| Common shares issued in connection with the conversion of Series C preferred shares | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | (100 | ) | | | (100 | ) | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 4,452 | | | | 45 | | | | | | | | 55 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | − | |
| Series D-1 preferred shares issued in a private placement upon the conversion of short-term debt plus accrued interest | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 786 | | | | 786 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 786 | |
| Cost of warrants issued with Series D-1 preferred shares upon the conversion of short-term debt plus accrued interest | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | (391 | ) | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 391 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | − | |
| Accretion of beneficial conversion feature on Series D-1 preferred shares upon the conversion of short term debt plus accrued interest | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | (395 | ) | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 395 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | − | |
| Series D-2 preferred shares upon the conversion of short-term debt plus accrued interest | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 393 | | | | 393 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 393 | |
| Cost of warrants issued with Series D-2 preferred shares upon the conversion of short-term debt plus accrued interest | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | (196 | ) | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 196 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | − | |
| Accretion of beneficial conversion feature on Series D-1 preferred shares upon the conversion of short term debt plus accrued interest | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | (39 | ) | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 39 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | Series A-1Preferred Shares Outstanding | | | Series A-1Preferred Shares Amount | | | Series B Preferred Shares Outstanding | | | Series B Preferred Shares Amount | | | Series C Preferred Shares Outstanding | | | Series C Preferred Shares Amount | | | Series D-1 Preferred Shares Outstanding | | | Series D-1 Preferred Shares Amount | | | Series D-2 Preferred Shares Outstanding | | | Series D-2 Preferred Shares Amount | | Common Shares Outstanding | Common Stock Amount | Treasury Stock | | Additional Paid-In Capital | | Accumulated Deficit | | Non-Controlling Interest | | Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss) | | Total | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Series D-1 preferred shares issued in a private placement for cash, net of offering expenses of $26 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 837 | | | | 810 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 810 | |
| Cost of warrants issued with Series D-1 preferred shares issued in a private placement for cash | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | (302 | ) | | | | | | | | | | | | 302 | | | | | | | | | − | |
| Accretion of beneficial conversion feature on Series D-1 preferred shares issued in a private placement for cash | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | (381 | ) | | | | | | | | | | | | 381 | | | | | | | | | − | |
| Series D-2 preferred shares issued in a private placement for cash, net of offering expenses of $13 | | | 7 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 1,223 | | | | 1,211 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 1,211 | |
| Cost of warrants issued with Series D-2 preferred shares issued in a private placement for cash | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | (151 | ) | | | | | | 151 | | | | | | | | | − | |
| Accretion of beneficial conversion feature on Series D-1 preferred shares issued in a private placement for cash | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | (30 | ) | | | | | | 30 | | | | | | | | | | |
| Exchange of Series D-2 Preferred Stock for shares of Series D-1 Preferred Stock issued in May 2013 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 537 | | | | 537 | | | | (537 | ) | | | (537 | ) | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | − | |
| Cost of warrants issued on exchange of Series D Preferred Stock | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | (385 | ) | | | | | | | (192 | ) | | | | | | 577 | | | | | | | | | − | |
| Accretion of beneficial conversion feature on exchange of Series D Preferred Stock | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | (152 | ) | | | | | | | - | | | | | | | 152 | | | | | | | | | − | |
| Preferred share dividends, paid in kind | | | 78 | | | | 78 | | | | 1,044 | | | | 1,044 | | | | 433 | | | | 433 | | | | 131 | | | | 131 | | | | 402 | | | | 402 | | | | | | | (2,088 | ) | | | | | | | | − | |
| Accretion of beneficial conversion feature on preferred shares dividends issued in kind | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | (191 | ) | | | | | | | (59 | ) | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 250 | | | | | | | | | − | |
| Warrants issued with short term debt | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 403 | | | | | | | | | 403 | |
| Loan discount on demand notes | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 111 | | | | | | | | | 111 | |
| Net loss attributable to non-controlling interest | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | − | | | | | − | |
| Comprehensive loss: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Net loss | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | (4,764) | | | | | | | | (4,764 | ) |
| Foreign currency translation adjustment | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 15 | | | 15 | |
| Balance as of December 31, 2013 | | | 1,031 | | | $ | 1,031 | | | | 11,102 | | | $ | 9,232 | | | | 4,508 | | | $ | 4,895 | | | | 3,415 | | | $ | 2,357 | | | | 4,783 | | | $ | 3,934 | | 232,558 | $2,390 | $(325) | | $ | 97,419 | | $(119,184) | | $ | (536 | ) | $(14) | | $ | 1,199 | |
See accompanying notes to these Consolidated Financial Statements
Communication Intelligence Corporation
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
(In thousands)
| | | | December 31, | |
| | | 2010 | | | 2009 | | | 2013 | | | 2012 | |
| Cash flows from operating activities: | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net loss | | $ | (4,159 | ) | | $ | (10,766 | ) | | $ | (4,764 | ) | | $ | (3,115 | ) |
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash used for operating activities: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Depreciation and amortization | | | 1,224 | | | | 1,107 | | | | 380 | | | | 459 | |
Accelerated amortization of certain capitalized software development costs | | | 1,009 | | | | − | | |
Amortization of debt discount and deferred financing costs | | | 1,776 | | | | 1,678 | | | | 44 | | | | 64 | |
Loss on extinguishment of long-term debt | | | − | | | | 829 | | |
Loss on extinguishment of debt | | | | 67 | | | ─ | |
Stock-based employee compensation | | | 93 | | | | 318 | | | | 819 | | | | 461 | |
Warrants issued with demand notes | | | | 436 | | | | − | |
Restricted stock expense | | | 40 | | | | − | | | | − | | | | 2 | |
Stock issued for services | | | 66 | | | | − | | |
(Gain) loss on derivative liability | | | (3,136 | ) | | | 5,136 | | |
Non cash interest expense | | | 291 | | | | 337 | | |
Series C preferred shares issued in settlement of indemnity claim | | | | − | | | | 417 | |
Common Stock received as settlement of 16b claim | | | | − | | | | (325 | ) |
Gain on derivative liability | | | | (103 | ) | | | (211 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | |
Changes in operating assets and liabilities: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Accounts receivable, net | | | 124 | | | | 473 | | | | 291 | | | | (403 | ) |
Prepaid expenses and other assets | | | 22 | | | | 15 | | |
Prepaid expenses and other current assets | | | | 16 | | | | (44 | ) |
Accounts payable | | | 332 | | | | 26 | | | | 252 | | | | (188 | ) |
Accrued compensation | | | 119 | | | | (42 | ) | | | 26 | | | | 68 | |
Other accrued liabilities | | | 173 | | | | (67 | ) | | | 54 | | | | (93 | ) |
Deferred revenue | | | (219 | ) | | | 982 | | | | (254 | ) | | | (96 | ) |
Net cash (used for) provided by operating activities | | | (2,245 | ) | | | 26 | | |
Net cash (used for) operating activities | | | | (2,736 | ) | | | (3,004 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Cash flows from investing activities: Acquisition of property and equipment | | | (14 | ) | | | (8 | ) | | | (5 | ) | | | (12 | ) |
Capitalized software development costs | | | (772 | ) | | | (813 | ) | |
Net cash used for investing activities | | | (786 | ) | | | (821 | ) | | | (5 | ) | | | (12 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Cash flows from financing activities: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Deferred financing costs | | | − | | | | (174 | ) | |
Net proceeds from issuance of short-term debt | | | 1,390 | | | | − | | | | 1,460 | | | | 2,328 | |
Net proceeds from exercise of stock options and warrants | | | | | | | 26 | | |
Net proceeds from issuance of long-term debt | | | − | | | | 1,100 | | |
Net proceeds from issuance of Series B preferred shares | | | 860 | | | | − | | |
Net proceeds from issuance of Series C preferred shares | | | 1,789 | | | | − | | |
Principal payments on short term debt | | | (150 | ) | | | (65 | ) | |
Net proceeds from issuance of Series D-1 preferred shares | | | | 810 | | | | − | |
Net proceeds from issuance of Series D-2 preferred shares | | | | 1,210 | | | | 967 | |
Proceeds from exercise of warrants for cash | | | | 29 | | | | 212 | |
Proceeds from exercise of stock options | | | | − | | | | 13 | |
Principal payments on short term notes payable | | | | (310 | ) | | | (325 | ) |
Net cash provided by financing activities | | | 3,889 | | | | 887 | | | | 3,199 | | | | 3,195 | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
| Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents | | | | − | | | | − | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Net increase in cash and cash equivalents | | | 858 | | | | 92 | | | | 459 | | | | 179 | |
| Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period | | | 1,021 | | | | 929 | | | | 486 | | | | 307 | |
| Cash and cash equivalents at end of period | | $ | 1,879 | | | $ | 1,021 | | | $ | 945 | | | $ | 486 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
TheSee accompanying notes form an integral part ofto these Consolidated Financial Statements
Communication Intelligence Corporation
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
(In thousands)
Supplemental disclosure of cash flow information:
| | | December 31 | |
| | | 2010 | | | | | 2009 | |
| Supplementary disclosure of cash flow information | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
| Non-cash financing and investing transactions | | | | | | | | | |
Secured indebtedness and accrued interest exchanged for Series B convertible preferred stock | | $ | 6,608 | | | | | $ | − | |
Conversion feature of Series B preferred shares classified as a derivative liability | | $ | 2,000 | | | | | | − | |
Dividends on preferred shares | | $ | 394 | | | | | $ | 61 | |
Conversion feature of Series B preferred shares dividends issued as payment in-kind classified as a derivative liability | | $ | 30 | | | | | | − | |
Conversion of Series A-1 preferred stock to common stock | | $ | − | | | | | $ | 166 | |
Issuance of long-term debt for payment of interest in kind | | $ | − | | | | | $ | 355 | |
Reclassification of equity linked instrument to derivative liability | | $ | − | | | | | $ | 1,353 | |
Debt discount and related liability recorded in connection with long-term debt | | $ | − | | | | | $ | 3,433 | |
| Warrants issued as payment of financing services | | $ | 153 | | | | | $ | − | |
Warrants issued in connection with bridge loans recorded as derivative liabilities | | $ | 682 | | | | | $ | − | |
Warrants issued for interest recorded as a derivative liability | | $ | 170 | | | | | $ | 291 | |
Conversion feature of Series C preferred shares classified as a derivative liability | | $ | 179 | | | | | $ | − | |
| | | December 31 | |
| | | 2013 | | | 2012 | |
| Supplementary disclosure of cash flow information | | | | | | |
| Interest paid | | $ | 1 | | | $ | 21 | |
| Income taxes paid | | $ | − | | | $ | − | |
| | | | | | | | | |
| Non-cash financing and investing transactions | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | |
Cashless exercise of warrants | | $ | 23 | | | $ | 202 | |
Dividends on preferred shares | | $ | 2,088 | | | $ | 1,466 | |
Conversion of Series B Preferred shares into Common Stock | | $ | − | | | $ | 140 | |
Conversion of Series C Preferred Stock into Common Stock | | $ | 56 | | | $ | 39 | |
Debt discount recorded in connection with short-term debt | | $ | 111 | | | $ | 64 | |
| Conversion of short term notes plus accrued interest into Series D-1 preferred shares | | $ | 786 | | | $ | 1,034 | |
| Conversion of short term notes plus accrued interest into Series D-2 preferred shares | | $ | 391 | | | $ | 2,065 | |
Accretion of beneficial conversion feature on Preferred Shares | | | | | | | | |
Series B Preferred Stock | | $ ─ | | | $ | 268 | |
Series C Preferred Stock | | $ | 191 | | | $ | 385 | |
Series D-1 Preferred Stock | | $ | 59 | | | $ | 13 | |
Series D-2 Preferred Stock | | $ ─ | | | $ ─ | |
Accretion of beneficial conversion feature on Preferred Shares issued | | | | | | | | |
Series C Preferred Stock | | $ ─ | | | $ | 417 | |
Series D-1 Preferred Stock | | $ | 929 | | | $ | 1,110 | |
Series D-2 Preferred Stock | | $ | 68 | | | $ ─ | |
Warrants issued in connection with the Series D financing | | | | | | | | |
Subscription agreements | | $ | 453 | | | $ ─ | |
Debt conversion | | $ | 587 | | | $ ─ | |
Exchange of May Series D financing | | $ | 575 | | | $ ─ | |
TheSee accompanying notes form an integral part ofto these Consolidated Financial Statements
Communication Intelligence Corporation
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(In thousands except per share amounts)
1. Nature of Business, Basis of Presentation and Summary of Significant Accounting PoliciesPolicies:
The Company:
Communication Intelligence Corporation (the "Company" or "CIC") is a leading supplier of electronic signature products and the recognized leader in biometric signature verification. CIC enables companies to achieve truly paperless workflow in their electronic business processes by providing multiple signature technologies across virtually all applications. CIC’s solutions are available both in SaaS and on-premise delivery models and afford “straight-through-processing,” which can increase customer revenue by enhancing user experience and can also reduce costs through paperless and virtually error-free electronic transactions that can be completed significantly quicker than paper-based procedures. To date, the Company primarily has delivered biometric and electronic signature solutions to channel partners and end-user customers in the financial services industry.
The Company's research and development activities have given rise to numerous technologies and products. The Company's core technologies can be referred to as "transaction-enabling” technologies. These technologies include various forms of electronic signatures, such as handwritten biometric, click-to-sign and others, as well as signature verification, cryptography and the logging of audit trails to show signers’ intent. These technologies can enable secure, legal and regulatory compliant electronic transactions that can enhance customer experience at a fraction of the time and cost required by traditional, paper-based processes. The Company’s products include SignatureOne®SignatureOne®, Ceremony® Server™, SignatureOne® Profile Server™, Sign-it®Ceremony® Serve, Sign-it® iSign® Console™ and iSign®.the iSign® toolkits.
Going concern and management plans:
The accompanying consolidated financial statements have been prepared assuming that the Company will continue as a going concern. Except for 2004, the Company has incurred significant losses since its inception and, at December 31, 2010,2013, the Company’s accumulated deficit was approximately $107,300.$119,184. The Company has primarily met its working capital needs through the sale of debt and equity securities. As of December 31, 2013, the Company’s cash balance was approximately $945. These factors raise substantial doubt about the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern. The Company has primarily funded these losses through the sale of debt and equity securities. As of December 31, 2010, the Company’s cash balance was approximately $1,879. These factors raise substantial doubt about the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern. In June 2008 and May 2009 the Company raised funds through debt and equity financings and converted short-term notes payable to equity. In May, June and July 2010, the Company amended its credit agreement to provide for an additional $1,260 in short term funding. On August 4, 2010, stockholders approved the issuance of a Series B Participating Convertible Preferred Stock and the Company converted approximately $6,608 of long-term debt due in December 2010 into shares of Series B Preferred Stock. In addition the Company sold, for cash in a private placement, 1,440 additional shares of Series B Preferred Stock at a purchase price of $1.00 per share (Note 5). In December 2010 the shareholders approved the issuance of a Series C Participating Convertible Preferred Stock and the Company sold, for cash in a private placement, 2,211 shares of Series C Preferred Stock at a purchase price of $1.00 per share (Note 5).
There can be no assurance that the Company will be successful in securing adequate capital resources to fund planned operations or that any additional funds will be available to the Company when needed, or if available, will be available on favorable terms or in amounts required by the Company. If the Company is unable to obtain adequate capital resources to fund operations, it may be required to delay, scale back or eliminate some or all of its operations, which may have a material adverse effect on the Company's business, results of operations and ability to operate as a going concern. The consolidated financial statements do not include any adjustments that might result from the outcome of this uncertainty.
Communication Intelligence Corporation
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(In thousands except per share amounts)
1. Nature of Business, Basis of Presentation and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (continued)
Basis of consolidation:
The accompanying consolidated financial statements are prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles in the United States of America, and include the accounts of Communication Intelligence Corporation and its 90%-owned Joint Venture in the People's Republic of China. All inter-company accounts and transactions have been eliminated. All amounts shown in the accompanying consolidated financial statements are in thousands of dollars except per share amounts.
Reclassification:
Certain amounts in the consolidated financial statements for 2012 have been reclassified to conform to the 2013 presentation. These reclassifications have no effect on net income, earnings per share, or cash flows as previously reported.
Communication Intelligence Corporation
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(In thousands except per share amounts)
1. Nature of Business, Basis of Presentation and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies:
Use of estimates:
The preparation of consolidated financial statements in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities, at the date of the consolidated financial statements, as well as the reported amounts of revenue and expenses during the reporting periods. Actual results could differ from these estimates.
Fair value measures:
Fair value is the price that would be received to sell an asset, or paid to transfer a liability, in the principal or most advantageous market for the asset or liability in an ordinary transaction between market participants on the measurement date. Our policy on fair value measures requires us to maximize the use of observable inputs and minimize the use of unobservable inputs when measuring fair value. The policy establishes a fair value hierarchy based on the level of independent, objective evidence surrounding the inputs used to measure fair value. A financial instruments:instrument’s categorization within the fair value hierarchy is based upon the lowest level of input that is significant to the fair value measurement. The policy prioritizes the inputs into three levels that may be used to measure fair value:
Level 1: Applies to assets or liabilities for which there are quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities.
Level 2: Applies to assets or liabilities for which there are inputs other than quoted prices that are observable for the asset or liability such as quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities in active markets; quoted prices for identical assets or liabilities in markets with insufficient volume or infrequent transactions (less active markets); or model-derived valuations in which significant inputs are observable or can be derived principally from, or corroborated by, observable market data.
Level 3: Applies to assets or liabilities for which there are unobservable inputs to the valuation methodology that are significant to the measurement of the fair value of the assets or liabilities.
The carrying amounts of the Company's financial instruments, including cashCompany’s assets and cash equivalents, accounts receivable, accounts payable, short-term debt and long-term debt approximate fair value due to their relatively short maturities. The derivative liability has been statedliabilities measured at fair value, usingwhether recurring or non-recurring, at December 31, 2013 and December 31, 2012, and the fair value calculation input hierarchy level that we have determined applies to each asset and liability category.
Fair Value of Financial Instruments:
The Company carries financial instruments on the consolidated balance sheet at the fair value of the instruments as of the consolidated balance sheet date. At the end of each period, management assesses the fair value of each instrument and adjusts the carrying value to reflect its assessment. At December 31, 2013 and December 31, 2012, the carrying values of accounts receivable and accounts payable approximated their fair values.
Treasury Stock:
Shares of common stock returned to, or repurchased by, the Company are recorded at cost and are included as a discounted Black-Sholes option pricingseparate component of stockholders’ equity.
Under the cost method, the gross cost of the shares reacquired is charged to a contra equity account entitled treasury stock. The equity accounts that were credited for the original share issuance (common stock, paid-in capital in excess of par, etc.) remain intact. When the treasury shares are reissued, proceeds in excess of cost are credited to a paid-in capital account. Any deficiency is charged to retained earnings (unless paid-in capital from previous treasury share transactions exists, in which case the deficiency is charged to that account, with any excess charged to retained earnings).
Communication Intelligence Corporation
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(In thousands except per share amounts)
1. Nature of Business, Basis of Presentation and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies:
Derivatives:
The Company, from time to time, enters into transactions which contain conversion privileges, the settlement of which may entitle the holder or the Company to settle the obligation(s) by issuance of Company securities. The Company applies a two-step model (Note 4).in determining whether a financial instrument or an embedded feature is indexed to an issuer’s own stock and thus able to qualify for the scope exception. The fair value of each derivative is estimated each reporting period.
Cash and cash equivalents:
The Company considers all highly liquid investments with maturities at the date of purchase of three months or less to be cash equivalents.
The Company's cash and cash equivalents, (level 1 inputs), at December 31, consisted of the following:
| | 2010 | 2009 |
Cash in bank | $ | 1,852 | | $ | 124 |
Money market funds | | 27 | | | 897 |
| | | | | | |
Cash and cash equivalents | $ | 1,879 | | $ | 1,021 |
| | | | | | |
| | | 2013 | | | 2012 | |
Cash in bank | | $ | 945 | | | $ | 486 | |
Money market funds | | | – | | | | − | |
| | | | | | | | | |
Cash and cash equivalents | | $ | 945 | | | $ | 486 | |
Concentrations of credit risk:
Financial instruments that potentially subject the Company to significant concentrations of credit risk consist primarily of cash, cash equivalents, and accounts receivable. The Company maintains its cash and cash equivalents with various financial institutions. This diversification of risk is consistent with Company policy to maintain liquidity, and mitigate risk of loss as to principal.
To date, accounts receivable have been derived principally from revenue earned from end users, manufacturers, and distributors of computer products in North America. The Company performs periodic credit evaluations of its customers, and does not require collateral. The Company maintains reserves for potential credit losses; historically, such losses have been within management's expectations.
Communication Intelligence Corporation
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(In thousands except per share amounts)
1. Nature of Business, Basis of Presentation and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (continued)
Concentrations of credit risk (continued):
The allowance for doubtful accounts is based on the Company’s assessment of the collectability of specific customer accounts and an assessment of international, political and economic risk as well as the aging of the accounts receivable. If there is a change in actual defaults from the Company’s historical experience, the Company’s estimates of recoverability of amounts due could be affected and the Company will adjust the allowance accordingly.
Deferred financing costs:
Deferred financing costs include costs paid in cash, such as professional fees and commissions. The costs are amortized to interest expense over the life of the notes or upon early payment using the effective interest method. The costs amortized to interest expense amounted to $218 for the year ended December 31, 2010. The costsThere were $0 and $64 in cost amortized to interest expense for the yearyears ended December 31, 2009 amounted to $425, including $212 of unamortized fees written off due to cancellation of the June 2008 notes in May 2009.2013 and 2012.
Property and equipment, net:
Property and equipment are stated at cost. Depreciation is computed using the straight-line method over the estimated useful lives of the related assets, ranging from three to five years. Leasehold improvements are amortized over their estimated useful lives, not to exceed the term of the related lease. The cost of additions and improvements is capitalized, while maintenance and repairs are charged to expense as incurred. Depreciation expense was $19$15 and $25$12 for the years ended December 31, 20102013 and 2009,2012, respectively.
Property and equipment, net at December 31, consists of the following:
| | | 2010 | | | 2009 | |
Machinery and equipment | | $ | 1,224 | | | $ | 1,210 | |
Office furniture and fixtures | | | 435 | | | | 435 | |
Leasehold improvements | | | 90 | | | | 90 | |
Purchased software | | | 323 | | | | 323 | |
| | | | | | | | �� | |
| | | | 2,072 | | | | 2,058 | |
Less accumulated depreciation and amortization | | | (2,046 | ) | | | (2,027 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | $ | 26 | | | $ | 31 | |
| | | | | | | | | |
Patents:
On October 6, 2000, the Company acquired certain assets of PenOp Limited (“PenOp”) and its subsidiary PenOp Inc. pursuant to an asset purchase agreement dated as of September 29, 2000.
The nature of the underlying technology of each material patent is as follows:
· | Patent numbers 5544255, 5647017, 5818955 and 6064751 involve (a) the electronic capture of a handwritten signature utilizing an electronic tablet device on a standard computer system within an electronic document, (b) the verification of the identity of the person providing the electronic signature through comparison of stored signature measurements, and (c) a system to determine whether an electronic document has been modified after signature. |
Communication Intelligence Corporation
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(In thousands except per share amounts)
1. Nature of Business, Basis of Presentation and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (continued)Policies:
Patents (continued):
· | Patent number 6091835 involves all of the foregoing and the recording of the electronic execution of a document regardless of whether execution occurs through a handwritten signature, voice pattern, fingerprint or other identifiable means. |
· | Patent numbers 5933514, 6212295, 6381344, and 6487310 involve methods and processes related to handwriting recognition developed by the Company over the years. Legal fees associated with these patents were immaterial and expensed as the fees were incurred. |
Patents, net consists of the following at December 31:
| | | Expiration | | Estimated Original Life | | 2010 | | 2009 | |
Patent (Various) | | Various | | | 5 | | $ | 9 | | $ | 9 | |
Patent (Various) | | Various | | | 7 | | | 476 | | | 476 | |
| 5544255 | | | | 2013 | | | 13 | | | 93 | | | 93 | |
| 5647017 | | | | 2014 | | | 14 | | | 187 | | | 187 | |
| 5818955 | | | | 2015 | | | 15 | | | 373 | | | 373 | |
| 6064751 | | | | 2017 | | | 17 | | | 1,213 | | | 1,213 | |
| 6091835 | | | | 2017 | | | 17 | | | 4,394 | | | 4,394 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | 6,745 | | | 6,745 | |
Less accumulated amortization | | | | | | | | | (4,353 | | | (3,974 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | $ | 2,392 | | $ | 2,771 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Patents are stated at cost less accumulated amortization that, in management’s opinion, does not exceed fair value. Amortization is computed using the straight-line method over the estimated lives of the related assets, ranging from five to seventeen years. Amortization expense was $379$365 and $378$365 for the years ended December 31, 20102013 and 2009,2012, respectively. Amortization expense is estimated to be $379 for each of the six years through December 31, 2017. The estimated remaining weighted average useful lives of the patents are 64 years. The patents identified as "various" are technically narrow or dated patents that the Company believes the expiration of which will not be material to its operations. At December 31, 2010, the net carrying value of those patents is $0.
The useful lives assigned to the patents are based upon the following assumptions and conclusions:Future patent amortization is as follows:
· | The estimated cash flow from products based upon each patent are expected to exceed the value assigned to each patent; |
· | There are no legal, regulatory or contractual provisions known to the Company that limit the useful life of each patent to less than the assigned useful life; |
· | No additional material costs need to be incurred or modifications made in order for the Company to continue to be able to realize the protection afforded by the patents; and |
· | The Company does not foresee any effects of obsolescence or significant competitive pressure on its current or future products, anticipates increasing demand for products utilizing the patented technology, and believes that the current markets for its products based on the patented technology will remain constant or will grow over the useful lives assigned to the patents because of a legal, regulatory and business environment encouraging the use of electronic signatures. |
Communication Intelligence Corporation
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(In thousands except per share amounts)
1. Nature of Business, Basis of Presentation and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (continued)
Patents (continued):
The Company performs intangible asset impairment analyses at least annually in accordance with the guidance in the Codification Topic ASC 350-30-05, “Goodwill and Other” ( “ASC 350”) and ASC 360-05-4, “Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets” ("ASC 360"). The Company uses the guidance in ASC 350 in response to changes in industry and market conditions that affect its patents; the Company then determines if an impairment of its assets has occurred. Fair value is determined by estimating future cash flows from the products that are and will be protected by the patents and considering the additional factors listed in Critical Accounting Policies in Item 7 of this Form 10-K. The Company believes that no significant events or circumstances occurred or changed during the year ended December 31, 2010, and therefore concluded that no impairment in the carrying values of the patents existed at December 31, 2010.| Year Ended December 31, | | | |
| 2014 | | $ | 357 | |
| 2015 | | | 342 | |
| 2016 | | | 322 | |
| 2017 | | | 269 | |
| Total | | $ | 1,290 | |
Long-lived assets:
The Company evaluates the recoverability of its long-lived assets, including intangible assets such as patents, at least annually or whenever circumstances or events indicate such assets might be impaired. The Company would recognize an impairment charge in the event the net book value of such assets exceeded the future undiscounted cash flows attributable to such assets. No such impairment charges have been recorded induring the two years ended December 31, 2010.2013 and 2012, respectively.
Software development costs:Share-based payment:
Software development costs are accounted for in accordance withShare-based compensation expense is based on the guidance in the Codification Topic 985-20, "Costs of Software to be Sold, Leased or Marketed" ("ASC 985-20"). Under ASC 985-20, capitalization of software development costs begins upon the establishment of technological feasibility, subject to net realizableestimated grant date fair value considerations. The costs capitalized include the coding and testing of the product afterportion of share-based payment awards that are ultimately expected to vest during the technological feasibility has been establishedperiod. The grant date fair value of stock-based awards to employees and ends upondirectors is calculated using the releaseBlack Scholes valuation model. Forfeitures of share-based payment awards are estimated at the time of grant and revised, if necessary, in subsequent periods if actual forfeitures differ from those estimates and it is assumed no dividends will be declared. The estimated fair value of stock-based compensation awards to employees is amortized over the vesting period of the product. The annual amortization is equal to the straight-line amortization over the estimated useful life of the software and varies by type of software. The Company performs periodic impairment reviews to ensure that unamortized deferred development costs remain recoverable from the projected future net cash flows that they are expected to generate.options.
The capitalized costs are amortized to cost of sales. During 2010 and 2009, the Company capitalized approximately $772 and $813 of software development costs. Amortization of capitalized software development costs for the years ended December 31, 2010 and 2009, was $1,835 and $704, respectively. The increase between periods is related to the Company’s decision to accelerate the amortization of its software portfolio to better reflect the transition of its offering from being mostly product-based to becoming mostly server and service-based and to provide a closer match with the useful life of the development costs being capitalized. This acceleration resulted in an increase in amortization expense of $1,009 in 2010.
Communication Intelligence Corporation
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(In thousands except per share amounts)
1. Nature of Business, Basis of Presentation and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (continued)
Other accrued liabilities:
The Company records liabilities based on reasonable estimates for expenses, or payables that are known or estimated including deposits, taxes, rents and services. The estimates are for current liabilities that should be extinguished within one year.
The Company had the following other accrued liabilities at December 31:
| | | 2010 | | | 2009 | |
| Accrued professional services | | $ | 100 | | | $ | 102 | |
| Rents | | | 19 | | | | 39 | |
| Interest | | | – | | | | 1 | |
| Other | | | 40 | | | | 27 | |
| Total | | $ | 159 | | | $ | 169 | |
Material commitments:
The Company had the following commitments at December 31, 2010:
| | | Payments due by period | |
| Contractual obligations | | Total | | 2011 | | 2012 | | 2013 | | 2014 | | 2015 | | Thereafter | |
| Operating lease commitments (1) | | | 1,650 | | | 284 | | | 267 | | | 275 | | | 283 | | | 292 | | | 249 | |
| Total contractual cash obligations | | $ | 1,650 | | $ | 284 | | $ | 267 | | $ | 275 | | $ | 283 | | $ | 292 | | $ | 249 | |
1. | The Company extended the lease on its offices in April 2010. The base rent will decrease approximately 6% in November 2011 and then increase approximately 3% per annum over the term of the lease, which expires on October 31, 2016. |
Revenue recognition:
Revenue is recognized when earned in accordance with applicable guidance found in the Codification topic, ASC 605 “Revenue Recognition,” ASC 985-605, “Software Revenue Recognition,” and ASC 985-605-25 “Revenue Recognition, Multi-Element Arrangements”. The Company recognizes revenue from sales of software products upon shipment, provided that persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists, collection is determined to be probable, all non-recurring engineering work necessary to enable the Company's product to function within the customer's application has been completed and the Company's product has been delivered according to specifications. Revenue from service subscriptions is recognized as costs are incurred or over the service period, which everwhichever is longer. Software license agreements may contain multiple elements, including upgrades and enhancements, products deliverable on a when and if available basis and post contract support. Revenue from software license agreements is recognized upon delivery of the software, provided that persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists, collection is determined to be probable, all nonrecurring engineering work necessary to enable the Company's products to function within the customer's application has been completed, and the Company has delivered its product according to specifications.
For arrangements with multiple deliverables, the Company allocates consideration at the inception of an arrangement to all of its deliverables based on their relative selling prices. In the absence of the vendor-specificprices which is determined using vendor specific objective evidence or third-party evidence of the selling prices, Management’s best estimate of the selling prices is use. For the Company’s tangible products containing software and hardware elements that function together and deliver the tangible products’ essential functionality is accounted for under the multiple-element arrangements revenue recognition guidance discussed above.evidence.
Communication Intelligence Corporation
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(In thousands except per share amounts)
1. Nature of Business, Basis of Presentation and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (continued)Policies:
Maintenance revenue is recorded for post-contract support and upgrades or enhancements, which is paid for in addition to license fees, and is recognized as costs are incurred or over the support period whichever is longer. For undelivered elements where vendor specific objective and reliable evidence of fair value does not exist, revenue is deferred and subsequently recognized when delivery has occurred and when fair valuevendor specific evidence has been determined.
For each of the years ended December 31, 2010 and 2009, the Company’s sales in the United States as a percentage of total sales were 92% and 96%, respectively. For the years ended December 31, 2010 and 2009, the Company’s export sales as a percentage of total revenue were approximately 8% and 4%, respectively. Foreign sales are sales to customers in all countries other than the U.S.
Major customers:
Wells Fargo Bank accounted for 20% of total revenue for the year ended December 31, 2010. Two customers accounted for 55% of total revenue for the year ended December 31, 2009. American Family Insurance, Co. accounted for 12% and Wells Fargo Bank accounted for 43%.
Two customers accounted for 66% of gross accounts receivable at December 31, 2010. Mountain America Credit Union accounted for 49% and Oracle USA Inc. accounted for 17%. Four customers accounted for 75% of gross accounts receivable at December 31, 2009. eCom Asia Pacific, Ltd, accounted for 30%, Lender Live accounted for 22%, Integrasys accounted for 13%, and John Deere Information Systems accounted for 10%.
Research and development:
Research and development costs are charged to expense as incurred.
MarketingMarketing:
The Company expenses advertising (marketing) costs as incurred. These expenses are outbound marketing expenses associated with participation in industry events, related sales collateral and email campaigns aimed at generating customer participation in webinars. The expense for the years ended December 31, 20102013 and 20092012 was $20$15 and $59,$15, respectively.
Net loss per share:
The Company calculates net loss per share under the provisions of the Codification Topic ASC 260, Earnings Per Share. ASC 260relevant accounting guidance. That guidance requires the disclosure of both basic net loss per share, which is based on the weighted average number of shares outstanding, and diluted loss per share, which is based on the weighted average number of shares and dilutive potential shares outstanding.
For the year ended December 31, 2010, 10,028The number of shares of Common Stockcommon stock subject to outstanding options, preferred shares on an as converted basis and 135,131 shares issuable upon exercise of warrants were excluded from the calculation of dilutive earningsloss per share because the exercise of such options and warrantsas their inclusion would be anti-dilutive.anti-dilutive are as follows:
For the year ended December 31, 2009, 10,231 shares of Common Stock subject to outstanding options and 16,728 shares issuable upon exercise of the warrants were excluded from the calculation of dilutive earnings per share because the exercise of such options and warrants would be anti-dilutive.
Communication Intelligence Corporation
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements| | | December 31, 2013 | | | December 31, 2012 | |
| Common Stock subject to outstanding options | | | 69,537 | | | | 44,529 | |
| Series A-1 Preferred Stock | | | 1,031 | | | | 6,806 | |
| Series B Preferred Stock | | | 11,103 | | | | 232,142 | |
| Series C Preferred Stock | | | 4,508 | | | | 185,572 | |
| Series D-1 Preferred Stock | | | 3,415 | | | | 49,961 | |
| Series D-2 Preferred Stock | | | 4,784 | | | | 66,052 | |
| Warrants outstanding | | | 77,155 | | | | 151,722 | |
(In thousands except per share amounts)
1. Nature of Business, Basis of Presentation and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (continued)
Foreign currency translation:
The Company considers the functional currency of the Joint Venture, CICC to be the local currency of China, which is the Renminbi (“RMB”) and, accordingly, gains and losses from the translation of the local foreign currency financial statements are included as a component of "accumulatedaccumulated other comprehensive loss in”in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets. Foreign currency assets and liabilities are translated into U.S. dollars at the end-of-period exchange rates except for long-term assets and liabilities, which are translated at historical exchange rates. Revenue and expenses are translated at the average exchange rates in effect during each period except for those expenses related to consolidated balance sheet amounts which are translated at historical exchange rates.
Net foreign currency transaction gains and losses are included in "Interestinterest and other income, net"net in the accompanying consolidated statements of operations. Foreign currency transaction gains and losses in 20102013 and 20092012 were insignificant.
Comprehensive income:Communication Intelligence Corporation
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(In thousands except per share amounts)
1. Nature of Business, Basis of Presentation and Summary of Significant Accounting Standards Codification topic, ASC 220-10, “Comprehensive Income” (“ASC 220”), requires that all items recognized under accounting standards as components of comprehensive earnings be reported in an annual statement that is displayed with the same prominence as other annual financial statements. ASC 220 also requires that an entity classify items as other comprehensive earnings by their nature in an annual financial statement.Policies:
Income taxes:
Deferred tax assets and liabilities are recognized for the expected tax consequences of temporary differences between the tax bases of assets and liabilities and their financial statement reported amounts and for tax loss and credit carry-forwards. A valuation allowance is provided against deferred tax assets when it is determined to be more likely than not that the deferred tax asset will not be realized.
The Company follows the provisions of the Accounting Standards Codification topic, ASC 740, “Income Taxes” (ASC 740). There have been no unrecognized tax benefits and, accordingly, there has been no effect on the Company's financial condition or results of operations as a result of ASC 740.operations.
The Company files income tax returns in the U.S. federal jurisdiction and various state and foreign jurisdictions. The Company is no longer subject to U.S. federal tax examinations for years before 2003,2006, and state tax examinations for years before 2002.2005. Management does not believe there will be any material changes in ourthe Company’s unrecognized tax positions over the next 12 months.
The Company's policy is to recognize interest and penalties accrued on any unrecognized tax benefits as a component of income tax expense. As of the date of adoption of ASC 740, there was no accrued interest or penalties associated with any unrecognized tax benefits, nor was any interest expense recognized during the twelve month periods ended December 31, 2010 and 2009.
Recently issued accounting pronouncement:
In October 2009,Other accounting standards that have been issued or proposed by the FASB issuedor other standards-setting bodies are not expected to have a new accounting standard which provides guidance for arrangements with multiple deliverables. Specifically,material impact on the new standard requires an entity to allocate consideration at the inceptionCompany’s financial position, results of an arrangement to all of its deliverables based on their relative selling prices. In the absence of the vendor-specific objective evidenceoperations or third-party evidence of the selling prices, consideration must be allocated to the deliverables based on management’s best estimate of the selling prices. In addition, the new standard eliminates the use of the residual method of allocation. In October 2009, the FASB also issued a new accounting standard which changescash flows.
The following table summarizes accounts receivable and revenue recognition for tangible products containing software and hardware elements. Specifically, tangible products containing software and hardware that function together to deliver the tangible products’ essential functionality are scoped out of the existing software revenue recognition guidance and will be accounted for under the multiple-element arrangementsconcentrations:
| | | Accounts Receivable As of December 31, | | | Total Revenue for the year ended December 31, | |
| | | 2013 | | | 2012 | | | 2013 | | | 2012 | |
| Customer #1 | | | 47 | % | | | 67 | % | | | 15 | % | | | 29 | % |
| Customer #2 | | | 15 | % | | | − | | | | 10 | % | | | − | |
| Customer #3 | | | 19 | % | | | 16 | % | | | 16 | % | | | − | |
| Customer #4 | | | − | | | | − | | | | 10 | % | | | − | |
| Customer #5 | | | − | | | | − | | | | 12 | % | | | 19 | % |
| Total concentration | | | 81 | % | | | 83 | % | | | 63 | % | | | 48 | % |
The following table summarizes sales concentrations:
| | | December 31,2013 | | | December 31, 2012 | |
| Sales within the United States | | | 98 | % | | | 100 | % |
| Sales outside of the United States | | | 2 | % | | | − | |
| Total | | | 100 | % | | | 100 | % |
Communication Intelligence Corporation
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(In thousands except per share amounts)
| 3. | Property plant and equipment: |
Property and equipment, net at December 31, consists of the following:
| | | 2013 | | | 2012 | |
Machinery and equipment | | $ | 1,231 | | | $ | 1,227 | |
Office furniture and fixtures | | | 435 | | | | 435 | |
Leasehold improvements | | | 90 | | | | 90 | |
Purchased software | | | 323 | | | | 323 | |
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | 2,079 | | | | 2,075 | |
Less accumulated depreciation and amortization | | | (2,062 | ) | | | (2,047 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | $ | 17 | | | $ | 28 | |
| | | | | | | | | |
Patents, net consists of the following at December 31:
| | | | Expiration | | | Estimated Original Life | | | 2013 | | | 2012 | |
Patent (Various) | | | Various | | | | 5 | | | $ | 9 | | | $ | 9 | |
Patent (Various) | | | Various | | | | 7 | | | | 476 | | | | 476 | |
| | 5544255 | | | | 2013 | | | | 13 | | | | 93 | | | | 93 | |
| | 5647017 | | | | 2014 | | | | 14 | | | | 187 | | | | 187 | |
| | 5818955 | | | | 2015 | | | | 15 | | | | 373 | | | | 373 | |
| | 6064751 | | | | 2017 | | | | 17 | | | | 1,213 | | | | 1,213 | |
| | 6091835 | | | | 2017 | | | | 17 | | | | 4,394 | | | | 4,394 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | 6,745 | | | | 6,745 | |
Less accumulated amortization | | | | | | | | | | | | (5,455 | ) | | | (5,090 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | $ | 1,290 | | | $ | 1,655 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
The nature of the underlying technology of each material patent is as follows:
• Patent numbers 5544255, 5647017, 5818955 and 6064751 involve (a) the electronic capture of a handwritten signature utilizing an electronic tablet device on a standard computer system within an electronic document, (b) the verification of the identity of the person providing the electronic signature through comparison of stored signature measurements, and (c) a system to determine whether an electronic document has been modified after signature.
• Patent number 6091835 involves all of the foregoing and the recording of the electronic execution of a document regardless of whether execution occurs through a handwritten signature, voice pattern, fingerprint or other identifiable means.
• Patent numbers 5933514, 6212295, 6381344, and 6487310 involve methods and processes related to handwriting recognition developed by the Company over the years. Legal fees associated with these patents were immaterial and expensed as the fees were incurred.
The Company does not foresee any effects of obsolescence or significant competitive pressure on its current or future products, anticipates increasing demand for products utilizing the patented technology, and believes that the current markets for its products based on the patented technology will remain constant or will grow over the remaining useful lives assigned to the patents because of a legal, regulatory and business environment encouraging the use of electronic signatures.
Communication Intelligence Corporation
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(In thousands except per share amounts)
1. Nature of Business, Basis of Presentation and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (continued)
revenue recognition guidance discussed above. Both standards are effective on January 1, 2011 while early adoption is permitted. The Company adopted these new accounting standards on January 1, 2010 using the prospective method and the adoption did not have a material impact on our consolidated financial statements. Had the Company adopted these new standards in 2009, the impact on its consolidated financial statements would not have been material.
2. Chinese Joint Venture:| 5. | Chinese Joint Venture (Non-Controlling Interest): |
The Company currently owns 90% of a joint venture (the “Joint Venture”) with the Jiangsu Hongtu Electronics Group, a provincial agency of the People's Republic of China (the "Agency").China. The Joint Venture's business license expires October 18, 2043. There were no significant operations in 2013 or 2012.
The Joint Venture had no revenue for the years ended December 31, 20102013 and 2009,2012, respectively. It had no long-lived assets as of December 31, 20102013 and 2009.2012.
3. Debt:| 6. | Other accrued liabilities: |
Immediately prior toThe Company records liabilities based on reasonable estimates for expenses, or payables that are known or estimated including deposits, taxes, rents and services. The estimates are for current liabilities that should be extinguished within one year.
The Company had the conversion of debt (the “Recapitalization”) in August 2010 (see Note 5),following other accrued liabilities at December 31:
| | | 2013 | | | 2012 | |
| Accrued professional services | | $ | 8 | | | $ | 12 | |
| Rents | | | 35 | | | | 23 | |
| Management fees | | | 180 | | | | − | |
| Other | | | 9 | | | | 115 | |
| Total | | $ | 232 | | | $ | 150 | |
| 7. | Short-term notes payable: |
In April 2013, the Company had outstanding debt with a principal balance of $6,608 (recordedborrowed $250 in the balance sheet netform of a discount of $1,509). The outstanding balance included $1,260 of funds borrowed through bridge financing obtained in May, June and July 2010demand note from Phoenix Banner Holdings LLC, with the following terms: an interest rate of 8%10% per annum and a maturity date of December 31, 2010. Warrants to purchase 18,000 shares of Common Stock with an exercise price of $0.06 per share expiringannum. The demand note plus accrued $2 in periods fromaccrued interest was paid in May 2013.
From August 2013 through JulyDecember 2013 were issued with the bridge financings. The remaining principal balance of $5,348 relates to funds raised in financing transactions in 2008 and 2009. The funds raised in these financings had the following terms: interest at 8% per annum and, at the option of the Company secured $1,150 in 10% demand notes from related parties and others that was used for working capital and general corporate purposes. In November, the Board of Directors approved the issuance of warrants in addition to the interest could be paid in cash or in kind. Warrants to purchase 80,154 shares of Common Stock with an exercise price of $0.06 and an expiration date of June 30, 2012 were issued in the financing transactions. Upon execution of each financing a debt discount was recorded. At December 31, 2009, a discount of $2,222 was included in the debt balance. For the years ended December 31, 2010 and 2009, amortization of the debt discount and deferred financing costs was $1,776 and $1,678, respectively. The unamortized discount of $1,509 was charged to paid-in capital in connection with conversion of the associated debt into shares of Series B Preferred Stock (Note 7). The warrants included in the financing transactions were determined to be derivative liabilities (Note 4).
In May and June 2010, the Company received loans aggregating $960 of the $1,260 in additional funding.on these demand notes. The Company issued 16,00021,667 warrants, 14,583 of which were issued for the notes secured prior to purchase sharesNovember 6, 2013, and a total of Common Stock at $0.06 per share. The7,084 warrants expire three years from the date of issuance.were issued for demand notes secured on November 26, and December 13, 2013. The Company ascribed a value of $622$406, recorded as interest expense, to the warrants which wasissued prior to November 6, 2013, and ascribed a value of $111, recorded as a debt discount to “Current portion of long-term debt”the warrants issued with notes secured after November 6, 2013. The Company recorded $44 in the balance sheet.
In July 2010, the Company entered into a third amendmentdebt discount amortization expense and $67 in loss on extinguishment upon conversion of the Credit Agreement dated June 5, 2008 (“Amendment No. 3”). Under Amendment No. 3 to the Credit Agreement, the Company received an additional $300 in secured indebtedness through the issuance of an additional secured promissory note tonotes. The warrants have a new investor. In connection with the issuance of this additional secured promissory note to this investor, the Company also issued 2,000 warrants to purchase shares of the Company’s Common Stock at $0.06 per share. The warrant expires three yearsyear life from the date of issuance. The Company ascribed a valuegrant and an exercise price of $60 to the$0.03. Detail on these demand notes and warrants which was recordedis as a discount to “Current portion of long-term debt” in the balance sheet. Prior to conversion upon the closing of the Recapitalization on August 5, 2010, the additional secured promissory note was due to mature on December 31, 2010.follows:
| | | Phoenix Banner Holdings LLC | | | Michael W. Engmann | | | Kendu Partners Company | | | JAG Multi Investments | | | Philip Sassower | |
| Date | | Note Amount | | | Warrants | | | Note Amount | | | Warrants | | | Note Amount | | | Warrants | | | Note Amount | | | Warrants | | | Note Amount | | | Warrants | |
| 8/2/2013 | | $ | 250 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| 9/3/2013 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | $ | 250 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| 9/27/2013 | | | | | | | | | $ | 250 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| 11/1/2013 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | $ | 125 | | | | 2,083 | | | | | | | |
| 11/6/2013 | | | | | | | 4,167 | | | | | | | | 4,167 | | | | | | | | 4,167 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| 12/13/2013 | | | | | | | | | | $ | 150 | | | | 5,000 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| 12/17/2013 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | $ | 125 | | | | 2,083 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Total | | $ | 250 | | | | 4,167 | | | $ | 400 | | | | 9,167 | | | $ | 250 | | | | 4,167 | | | $ | 125 | | | | 2,083 | | | $ | 125 | | | | 2,083 | |
The Company closed the Recapitalization on August 5, 2010, issuing 6,608 shares of Series B Preferred Stock in exchange for all of the Company’s outstanding secured indebtedness under the Exchange Agreement.
Communication Intelligence Corporation
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(In thousands except per share amounts)
3. Debt (continued):| 7. | Short-term notes payable: |
Interest expense associatedThe warrants were valued using the Black Sholes pricing model with the following assumptions:
Date | Expected Term | | Volatility | | | Risk free interest rate | | | Dividend yield | |
| 11/6/2013 | Three years | | | 202.9 | % | | | 0.58 | % | | $ | 0.00 | |
| 11/26/2013 | Three years | | | 200.8 | % | | | 0.55 | % | | $ | 0.00 | |
| 12/3/2013 | Three years | | | 198.8 | % | | | 0.68 | % | | $ | 0.00 | |
| 12/17/2013 | Three years | | | 198.0 | % | | | 0.68 | % | | $ | 0.00 | |
On December 31, 2013, the Company’s debtnote holders converted the notes discussed above into 786 shares of Series D-1 Preferred Stock and 393 shares of Series D-2 preferred Stock.
In November 2013, in addition to the above, the Company borrowed, in the form of demand notes, $60 from an employee of the Company. The notes plus accrued interest of $1 were repaid at December 31, 2013, from the proceeds of the financing.
In February and March 2012, the Company borrowed $25 and $100 from Phoenix, respectively, at 10% per annum in the form of demand notes. All principal and accrued interest was repaid in cash in the amount of $132 in September 2012.
In April 2012, the Company entered into the April 2012 Purchase Agreement with the April 2012 Investors, and issued the April 2012 Notes for $1,000, receiving $982 in cash, net of expenses of $17. In connection with the issuance of the April 2012 Notes, the Company recorded a discount on notes for $64, and, as the result of the conversion of the April 2012 Notes in November 2012, the discount was fully amortized to interest expense. The April 2012 Notes had an interest at the rate of 10% per annum and a maturity date of April 22, 2013. In connection with the issuance of the April 2012 Notes, the Company also issued to the April 2012 Investors warrants to purchase 5,000 shares of Common Stock at an exercise price of $0.05 per share. The April 2012 Warrants are exercisable for a period of three years from the date of issue. The Company ascribed a value of $47 to the April 2012 Warrants, which was recorded as a discount to notes payable and as a derivative liability. In connection with the April 2012 Purchase Agreement, the Company paid $17 in consulting fees and issued an aggregate of 349 warrants at an exercise price of $0.05 per share to two consultants. These warrants are exercisable for three years from the date of issue, and the Company ascribed to them a value of $3, using a modified Black Scholes pricing model. The related warrant value was recorded as a professional service fee expense and as a derivative liability. The April 2012 Notes and accrued interest were automatically converted into shares of Series D-2 Preferred Stock at a price of $1.00 per share at a closing that occurred on November 15, 2012 (the “Final Closing”), for $1,057.
In August and September 2012, the Company borrowed $50 and $50 from Phoenix Banner Holdings LLC, respectively, at 10% per annum in the form of demand notes. All principal and accrued interest was repaid in cash in the amount of $102 from the proceeds of the November 2012 closing.
In September 2012, the Company entered into the September 2012 Subscription Agreements with the September 2012 Investors. Under the terms of the September 2012 Subscription Agreements, the September 2012 Investors purchased approximately $1,103 of September 2012 Notes, and, subject to the satisfaction of certain closing conditions, agreed to purchase at the Final Closing approximately 1,103 shares of Series D-2 Preferred Stock at a purchase price of $1.00 per share. The Company received $778 net of expenses in cash for the year endedSeptember 2012 Notes, and proceeds of $967 net of offering costs of $115 for 1,082 of Series D-2 Preferred Stock at the Final Closing. The September 2012 Notes had an interest at the rate of 10% per annum, and a maturity date of December 31, 20102012. The September 2012 Notes and 2009accrued unpaid interest were converted into 1,121 shares of Series D-2 Preferred Stock at a price of $1.00 per share upon the consummation of the Final Closing. The Series D-2 Preferred Stock is convertible into shares of the Company’s Common Stock at a conversion price of $0.05 per share (subject to adjustment). The Final Closing was $2,039subject to stockholder approvals and $2,033, respectively,the satisfaction of which $1,974 and $1,912customary closing conditions. A portion of the proceeds from the September 2012 Notes was used to repay approximately $225 in demand notes to a related party expense. Amortizationand an employee of debt discountthe Company, and deferred financing costs included in interest expense for the year ended December 31, 2010working capital and 2009 was $1,776 and $1,678, respectively, of which $1,719 and $1,600 was related party expense.general corporate
Communication Intelligence Corporation
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(In thousands except per share amounts)
| 7. | Short-term notes payable: |
4. Derivative liability:purposes in the ordinary course of business. In connection with the September 2012 Subscription Agreements, the Company, after the Final Closing, issued an aggregate of 294 warrants to four consultants as a finder’s fee and 3,000 warrants to SG Phoenix LLC as and administrative fee. These fee warrants have an exercise price of $0.05 per share and the Company recorded a derivative liability in the amount of $1 and $7, respectively.
In November 2012, shareholders approved an increase in the Company’s authorized capital and the issuance of Series D Preferred Stock. In November 2012 the Company converted approximately $3,099 of short-term debt and accrued interest into shares of Series D Preferred Stock net of offering costs of $190. The Company sold, for cash in a private placement, 1,082 of additional shares of Series D Preferred Stock at a purchase price of $1.00 per share and received $967 net of offering costs of $115.
| 8. | Derivative liabilities: |
The Company follows the guidance found in the Derivative and Hedging, Contracts in Entity’s Own Equity topic in the Codification, ASC 815-40-15. Paragraphs 15-5 through 15-8 specifieshas determined that a contract that would otherwise meet the definition of a derivative but is both (a) indexed to the Company’s own stock and (b) classified in stockholders’ equity in the statement of financial position would not be considered a derivative financial instrument. ASC 815-40-15 providesThe Company applies a two-step model to be applied in determining whether a financial instrument or an embedded feature is indexed to an issuer’s own stock and thus able to qualify for the scope exception.
The Company adopted ASC 815-40-15 effective January 1, 2009, and determined thatissued certain warrants and the embedded conversion feature on the Series A-1, Series B Preferred Shares and Series C Preferred Sharesin connection with financing transactions from 2010 through 2012 that require liability classification because of certain provisions that may resulthave resulted in an adjustment to the number of shares issued upon settlement and an adjustment to their exercise or conversion.price. The Company classifies these warrants were retroactively reclassifiedon its balance sheet as liabilities,a derivative liability which is fair valued at each reporting period subsequent to the result wasinitial issuance. The Company used a decrease in paid-in capital as of January 1, 2009 of $3,510, a decrease in accumulative deficit of $2,157simulated probability valuation model to value these warrants. Determining the appropriate fair-value model and calculating the recognition of a liability of $1,353 during various dates. The fair value of warrants requires considerable judgment. Any change in the embedded conversion feature forestimates (specifically, probabilities) used may cause the Series A-1 Preferred Shares at December 31, 2010value to be higher or lower than that reported. The assumptions used in the model required significant judgment by management and December 31, 2009 was insignificant.include the following: volatility, expected term, risk-free interest rate, dividends, warrant holders’ expected rate of return, reset provisions based on expected future financings, projected stock prices, and probability of exercise. The fair valueestimated volatility of the embedded conversion featureCompany’s common stock at the date of issuance, and at each subsequent reporting period, is based on historical volatility. The risk-free interest rate is based on rates published by the government for bonds with a maturity similar to the expected remaining life of the warrants at the valuation date. The expected life of the warrants is assumed to be equivalent to their remaining contractual term. Dividends are estimated at 0% based on the Series B Preferred Shares on the initial valuation date was approximately $2.0 million. The fair valueCompany’s history of the embedded conversion feature on the Series B Preferred Shares at December 31, 2010 was approximately $130 (Note 7). The fair value of the embedded conversion feature on the Series C Preferred Shares on the initial valuation date, December 31, 2010, was approximately $179.no common stock dividends.
The Company issued additionalthe following warrants to purchase 30,405 shares of common stock during the year ended December 31, 2010, including 18,000 in connection with bridge financing, 3,469 for paid in-kind interest and 8,936 for services related to the Recapitalizationbridge financings in April and Purchase Agreements (Note 7).November 2012. Included in the April 2012 warrants were warrants issued as finder’s fees. The issuanceNovember warrants issued included warrants issued to related parties as administrative fees and warrants issued as finder’s fees. The warrants have a three year life from the date of issue with a zero dividend yield and were valued using a simulated probability valuation model. Additional information with respect to these warrants is presented in the table below.
Issue Date | Reason for issuance | | Number of warrants issued | | | Exercise price | | | Risk free interest rate | | | Expected volatility | | | Derivative liability value on date of issue | |
| 4/23/2012 | Bridge financing warrants | | | 5,000 | | | $ | 0.050 | | | | 1.78 | % | | | 205.3 | % | | $ | 50 | |
| 4/23/2012 | Finder’s fee warrants | | | 349 | | | $ | 0.050 | | | | 1.78 | % | | | 205.3 | % | | | | |
| 11/15/2012 | Administrative fee warrants | | | 3,000 | | | $ | 0.050 | | | | 1.58 | % | | | 202.2 | % | | $ | 8 | |
| 11/15/2012 | Finder’s fee warrants | | | 294 | | | $ | 0.050 | | | | 1.58 | % | | | 202.2 | % | | | | |
The fair value of the Series C Preferred Shares resulted in an increase in the liability of $179. Theoutstanding derivative liabilities were adjusted to fair value as of December 31, 2010, resulting in a decrease in the liability and other expense of $3,136 for the year ended December 31, 2010. The ending derivative liability balance at December 31, 2010 was $499.
The Company uses a discounted Black-Scholes pricing model to calculate the fair value of its preferred share2013, and warrant liabilities. Key assumptions used to apply these models are as follows:
| | | December 31, 2010 | | | December 31, 2009 | |
| Expected term | | 0.5 to 4.00 years | | | 0.5 to 3.00 years | |
| Volatility | | 141.5% - 184.1% | | | 139.0% - 156.0% | |
| Risk-free interest rate | | 0.29 – 1.02% | | | 1.70% | |
| Dividend yield | | 0% | | | 0% | |
Fair value measurements:
Assets and liabilities measured at fair value as of December 31, 2010, are as follows:2012, was $25 and $128, respectively.
| | | Value at December 31, 2010 | | | Quoted prices in active markets | | | Significant other observable inputs | | | Significant unobservable inputs | |
| | | | | | (Level 1) | | | (Level 2) | | | (Level 3) | |
| Derivative liability | | $ | 499 | | | $ | − | | | $ | − | | | $ | 499 | |
Communication Intelligence Corporation
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(In thousands except per share amounts)
4. Derivative liability (continued):
The fair value framework requires a categorization of assets and liabilities into three levels based upon the assumptions (inputs) used to price the assets and liabilities. Level 1 provides the most reliable measure of fair value, whereas Level 3 generally requires significant management judgment. The three levels are defined as follows:
Level 1: Unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical assets and liabilities.
| 8. | Level 2: Observable inputs other than those included in Level 1. For example, quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities in active markets or quoted prices for identical assets or liabilities in inactive markets.Derivative liabilities: |
| Level 3: Unobservable inputs reflecting management’s own assumptions about the inputs used in pricing the asset or liability. |
There were no financial assets or liabilities measured at fair value, with the exception of cash and cash equivalents (level 1) and the above mentioned derivative liability as of December 31, 2010 and December 31, 2009.
Changes in the fair value of the level 3 derivative liability for the year ended December 31, 2010,2013, are as follows:
| | | Derivative Liability | |
| Balance at January 1, 2010 | | $ | 422 | |
| Additional liabilities recorded related to warrants issued for services | | | 153 | |
| Additional liabilities recorded related to warrants issued for interest paid in kind and bridge financing | | | 851 | |
| Additional liabilities recorded related to the conversion feature on Series B preferred shares and dividends paid in kind | | | 2,030 | |
| Additional liabilities recorded related to the conversion feature on Series C preferred shares | | | 179 | |
| Gain on derivative liability | | | (3,136 | ) |
| Balance at December 31, 2010 | | $ | 499 | |
| | | Derivative Liability | |
| Balance at January 1, 2012 | | $ | 128 | |
| Gain on derivative liability | | | 103 | |
| Balance at December 31, 2013 | | $ | 25 | |
5. Stockholders' equity:Assets and liabilities measured at fair value as of December 31, 2013, are as follows:
| | Value at December 31, 2013 | | Quoted prices in active markets | | Significant other observable inputs | | Significant unobservable inputs |
| | | | (Level 1) | | (Level 2) | | (Level 3) |
| Derivative liability | $25 | | $ − | | $ − | | $ 25 |
9.Common stock options:
At December 31, 2010,2013, the Company has onethree stock-based employee compensation plan, (the "2009 Stock Compensation Plan") and may also grants options to employees, directors and consultants outside ofplans, the 1999 Option Plan, the 2009 Stock Compensation Plan, under individual plans.
On July 1, 2009and the Board of Directors adopted the 20092011 Stock Compensation Plan. Non-qualified options under the 2009 Stock Compensation Plan are granted to employees, officers, and consultants of the Company. There were 7,000 shares of Common Stock authorized for issuance under the 2009 Stock Compensation Plan. The options have a term of three to seven years and vest immediately or quarterly over three years as defined. As of December 31, 2010, 3,745 plan options were outstanding, and 2,366 plan options were exercisable with a weighted average exercise price of $0.09 per share.
Communication Intelligence Corporation
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(In thousands except per share amounts)
5. Stockholders' equity (continued):
In April 1999, the Company adopted and in June 1999, the shareholders approved the 1999 Option Plan. Incentive and non-qualified options under the 1999 Option Plan were granted to employees, officers, and consultants of the Company. The 1999 Option Plan expired in April 2009 (options outstanding under that plan are not effectedaffected by its expiration). There were 4,000 sharesThe Company may also grant options to employees, directors and consultants outside of Commonthe active 2009 and 2011 under individual plans.
Information with respect to the Stock authorized for issuance under the 1999 Option Plan. The options had a seven year term and generally vested quarterly over three years. As ofCompensation Plans at December 31, 2010, 2,153 plan options were outstanding and 2,153 plan options were exercisable with a weighted average exercise price of $0.61 per share.2013 is as follows:
The Company has issued options under individual plans to its employees and directors. The individual plan options generally vest over four years or pro rata quarterly over three years. Non-plan options are generally exercisable over a period not to exceed seven years. As of December 31, 2010, 4,130 non-plan options were outstanding and 3,790 non-plan options were exercisable with a weighted average exercise price of $0.44 per share.
Share-based payment:
The Company accounts for stock based compensation in accordance with Accounting Standards Codification topic, ASC718 “Compensation- Stock Compensation” (“ASC 718”). ASC 718 requires the recognition of the cost of employee services received in exchange for an award of equity instrument in the financial statements and is measured based on the grant date fair value of the award.
| | 1999 Option Plan | 2009 Stock Compensation Plan | 2011 Stock Compensation Plan | Individual Plans |
| Shares authorized for issuance | 4,000 | 7,000 | 100,000 | − |
| Option vesting period | Quarterly over 3 years | Quarterly over 3 years | Immediate/Quarterly over 3 years | Quarterly over 3 years |
| Date adopted by shareholders | June 2009 | − | November 2011 | − |
| Option term | 7 Years | 3 to 7 Years | 7 Years | 7 Years |
| Options outstanding | 175 | 425 | 68,812 | 125 |
| Options exercisable | 175 | 425 | 42,654 | 125 |
| Weighted average exercise price | $0. 21 | $0.11 | $0.047 | $0.15 |
Share-based compensation expense is based on the estimated grant date fair value of the portion of share-based payment awards that are ultimately expected to vest during the period. The grant date fair value of stock-based awards to employees and directors is calculated using the Black-Scholes option pricing model. ASC 718 requires forfeitures of share-based payment awards to be estimated at the time of grant and revised, if necessary, in subsequent periods if actual forfeitures differ from those estimates. The estimated average forfeiture rates for the year ended December 31, 2010, was approximately 24%.
ASC 718 requires the cash flows from tax benefits for deductions in excess of the compensation costs recognized for share-based payment awards to be classified as financing cash flows. Due to the Company’s loss position, there were no such tax benefits during the year ended December 31, 2010.
Valuation and Expense Information under ASC 718:Information:
The weighted-average fair value of stock-based compensation is based on the single optionBlack Scholes valuation approach.model. Forfeitures are estimated and it is assumed no dividends will be declared. The estimated fair value of stock-based compensation awards to employees is amortized using the accrual method over the vesting period of the options. The fair value calculations are based on the following assumptions:
| | Year Ended
December 31, 2010
| Year Ended
December 31, 2009
|
Risk free interest rate | | 1.12% - 5.11% | 1.12% - 5.11% |
Expected life (years) | | 2.82 – 7.00 | 2.82 – 7.00 |
Expected volatility | | 91.99% - 147.4% | 91.99% - 145.0% |
Expected dividends | | None | None |
| | | Year Ended December 31, 2013 | Year Ended December 31, 2012 |
| Risk free interest rate | | 0.40% - 4.92% | 0.62% - 5.11% |
| Expected life (years) | | 2.82 – 7.00 | 2.82 – 7.00 |
| Expected volatility | | 91.99% - 198.38% | 91.99% - 180.36% |
| Expected dividends | | None | None |
| Estimated average forfeiture rate | | 10% | 10% |
Communication Intelligence Corporation
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(In thousands except per share amounts)
5. Stockholders' equity (continued):
Share-based payment:
The following table summarizes the allocation of stock-based compensation expense related to stock option grants under ASC 718 for the years ended December 31, 2010 and 2009. There were no stock option exercises during the year ended December 31, 2010. During the year ended December 31, 2009, 85 stock options were exercised at a weighted average $0.09 per share.
| | | Year Ended December 31, 2010 | | | Year Ended December 31, 2009 | |
| Research and development | | $ | 21 | | | $ | 59 | |
| Sales and marketing | | | 52 | | | | 98 | |
| General and administrative | | | 20 | | | | 137 | |
| Director options | | | – | | | | 24 | |
| Stock-based compensation expense included in operating expenses | | $ | 93 | | | $ | 318 | |
The summary activity under the Company’s 2009 Stock Compensation Plan, the 1999 Option Plan and Individual Plans is as follows:
| | | December 31, 2010 | | | December 31, 2009 | |
| | | Shares | | | Weighted Average Exercise Price | | Aggregate Intrinsic Value | | Weighted Average Remaining Contractual Life | | | Shares | | | Weighted Average Exercise Price | | Aggregate Intrinsic Value | | Weighted Average Remaining Contractual Life | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Outstanding at beginning of period | | | 10,231 | | | $ | 0.34 | | | | | | | | 7,608 | | | $ | 0.48 | | | | | |
Granted | | | 2,550 | | | $ | 0.08 | | | | | | | | 3,976 | | | $ | 0.10 | | | | | |
Exercised | | | – | | | $ | 0.00 | | | | | | | | (85 | ) | | $ | 0.09 | | | | | |
Forfeited | | | (2,753 | ) | | $ | 0.15 | | | | | | | | (1,268 | ) | | $ | 0.40 | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Outstanding at period end | | | 10,028 | | | $ | 0.33 | | | | | 3.2 | | | | 10,231 | | | $ | 0.34 | | | | | 3.9 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Options vested and exercisable at period end | | | 8,309 | | | $ | 0.38 | | | | | 2.6 | | | | 8,249 | | | $ | 0.39 | | | | | 3.3 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Weighted average grant-date fair value of options granted during the period | | $ | 0.08 | | | | | | | | | | | | $ | 0.10 | | | | | | | | | | |
The following table summarizes significant ranges of outstanding and exercisable options as of December 31, 2010:
| | | | Options Outstanding | | | Options Exercisable | |
| Range of Exercise Prices | | | Options Outstanding | | | Weighted Average Remaining Contractual Life(in years) | | | Weighted Average Exercise Price | | | Number Outstanding | | | Weighted Average Exercise Price | |
| $ | 0.00 – $0.50 | | | | 7,047 | | | | 3.8 | | | $ | 0.15 | | | | 5,328 | | | $ | 0.18 | |
| $ | 0.51 – $1.00 | | | | 2,908 | | | | 1.8 | | | $ | 0.72 | | | | 2,908 | | | $ | 0.72 | |
| $ | 1.01 – $2.00 | | | | 73 | | | | 1.2 | | | $ | 1.66 | | | | 73 | | | $ | 1.66 | |
| | | | | | 10,028 | | | | | | | | | | | | 8,309 | | | | | |
Communication Intelligence Corporation
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(In thousands except per share amounts)
5. Stockholders' equity (continued):9. Stockholders’ equity:
Share-based payment:
A summaryThe following table summarizes the allocation of stock-based compensation expense for the status of the Company’s non-vested shares as ofyears ended December 31, 2010 is as follows:2013 and 2012. The Company granted 26,553 options at a weighted average grant date fair value of $0.047 per share. There were no stock options exercised during the year ended December 31, 2013. There were 203 stock options exercised for cash proceeds of $13 during the year ended December 31, 2012.
Non-vested Shares | | Shares | | | Weighted Average Grant-Date Fair Value | |
Non-vested at January 1, 2010 | | | 1,982 | | | $ | 0.10 | |
| Granted | | | 2,550 | | | $ | 0.07 | |
| Forfeited | | | (1,895 | ) | | $ | 0.12 | |
| Vested | | | (918 | ) | | $ | 0.18 | |
| Non-vested | | | 1,719 | | | $ | 0.06 | |
| | | Year Ended December 31, 2013 | | | Year Ended December 31, 2012 | |
| Research and development | | $ | 262 | | | $ | 206 | |
| Sales and marketing | | | 100 | | | | 91 | |
| General and administrative | | | 410 | | | | 137 | |
| Director options | | | 47 | | | | 27 | |
| Stock-based compensation expense included in operating expenses | | $ | 819 | | | $ | 461 | |
As of December 31, 2010,2013, there was $43$270 of total unrecognized compensation cost related to non-vested share-based compensation arrangements. The unrecognized compensation cost is expected to be recognized over a weighted average period of 2.11.1 years.
The cash flows from tax benefits for deductions in excess of the compensation costs recognized for share-based payment awards would be classified as financing cash flows. Due to the Company’s loss position, there were no such tax benefits during the year ended December 31, 2013.
The summary activity for the Company’s 2009 and 2011 Stock Compensation Plans, the 1999 Option Plan and Individual Plans is as follows:
| | | December 31, 2013 | | December 31, 2012 | |
| | | Shares | | | Weighted Average Exercise Price | | Aggregate Intrinsic Value | | Weighted Average Remaining Contractual Life | | | Shares | | | Weighted Average Exercise Price | | | Aggregate Intrinsic Value | | | Weighted Average Remaining Contractual Life | |
| Outstanding at beginning of period | | | 44,529 | | | $ | 0.05 | | | | | | | | 51,353 | | | $ | 0.09 | | | | | | | |
Granted | | | 26,553 | | | $ | 0.04 | | | | | | | | 2,500 | | | $ | 0.06 | | | | | | | |
Exercised | | | − | | | $ | − | | ─ | | | | | | (203 | ) | | $ | 0.07 | | | $ | 2 | | | | |
Forfeited/ Cancelled | | | (1,545 | ) | | $ | 0.11 | | | | | | | | (9,121 | ) | | $ | 0.26 | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Outstanding at period end | | | 69,537 | | | $ | 0.05 | | ─ | | | 5.02 | | | | 44,529 | | | $ | 0.05 | | | | | | | | 3.2 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Options vested and exercisable at period end | | | 43,379 | | | $ | 0.05 | | ─ | | | 4.61 | | | | 23,319 | | | $ | 0.05 | | | | | | | | 2.6 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Weighted average grant-date fair value of options granted during the period | | $ | 0.04 | | | | | | | | | | | | $ | 0.06 | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
The following table summarizes significant ranges of outstanding and exercisable options as of December 31, 2013:
| | | | Options Outstanding | | | Options Exercisable | |
Range of Exercise Prices | | | Options Outstanding | | | Weighted Average Remaining Contractual Life(in years) | | | Weighted Average Exercise Price | | | Number Outstanding | | | Weighted Average Exercise Price | |
| $ | 0.00 – $0.50 | | | | 69,537 | | | | 5.02 | | | $ | 0.05 | | | | 43,379 | | | $ | 0.05 | |
Communication Intelligence Corporation
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(In thousands except per share amounts)
A summary of the status of the Company’s non-vested shares as of December 31, 2013 is as follows:
Non-vested Shares | | Shares | | | Weighted Average Grant-Date Fair Value | |
| Non-vested at January 1, 2013 | | | 21,210 | | | $ | 0.04 | |
| Granted | | | 26,553 | | | $ | 0.04 | |
| Forfeited | | | (682 | ) | | $ | 0.03 | |
| Vested | | | (20,923 | ) | | $ | 0.04 | |
| Non-vested at December 31, 2013 | | | 26,158 | | | $ | 0.05 | |
An employee or consultant desiring to exercise or convert his or her stock options must provide a signed notice of exercise to the Chief Financial Officer. Once the exercise is approved an issue order is sent to the Company’s transfer agent and by certificate or through other means of conveyance, the shares are delivered to the employee or consultant, generally within three business days. The Company has no plans to repurchase shares of Common Stock in the future.
The Company expects to make additional option grants in future years. The options issued to employees and directors will be subject to the same provisions of ASC 718,outlined above, which may have a material impact on the Company’s financial statements.
As of December 31, 2010, 10,0282013, 69,537 shares of Common Stockcommon stock were reserved for issuance upon exercise of outstanding options.
Treasury Stock:
The Company received 6,500 shares of its Common Stock having a fair value under the cost method of $325 in January 2012, in settlement of a 16b suit brought by a shareholder against Phoenix Venture Fund, LLC (“Phoenix”). At December 31, 2013, the total value of treasury stock was $325.
Preferred Shares:
Series A-1
In connection with the closingThe Company has five series of the June 2008 Financing Transaction, the Company also entered into a Securities Purchase Agreement (the “Purchase Agreement”) and a Registration Rights Agreement (the “Registration Rights Agreement”) each dated as of June 5, 2008. Under the Purchase Agreement, in exchange for the cancellation of $995 in principal amount and $45 of interest accrued thereon of the Company’s aggregate outstanding $2,071 in existing debt and interest accrued thereon through May 31, 2008, the Company issued to the holders of such debt an aggregate of 1,040 shares of the Company’s Series A Cumulative Convertible Preferred Stock, which shares were subsequently exchanged in October 2008 for an equivalent number of shares of Series A-1 Cumulative Convertible Preferred Stock (the “Series A-1 Preferred Shares”). During 2009, 146Stock; Series A-1 Preferred Shares were converted into 1,005 shares of the Company’s Common Stock. As of December 31, 2009, there are 813 Series A-1 Preferred Shares outstanding. The Series A-1 Preferred Shares carry an eight percent (8%) annual dividend, payable quarterly in arrears in cash or in additional Series A-1 Preferred Shares, have a liquidation preference over Common Stock, of one dollar ($1.00) per share and are convertible into shares of Common Stock at the conversion price of fourteen cents ($0.14) per share. If the outstanding Series A-1 Preferred Shares are converted in their entirety, the Company would issue 5,809 shares of Common Stock. The Series A-1 Preferred Shares are convertible any time after June 30, 2008. As of December 31, 2010, the Company has accrued dividends on the preferred shares of $170.
During the year ended December 31, 2009, one preferred shareholder, a related party, converted an aggregate of 166 preferred shares into 1,183 shares of the Company’s Common Stock.
Communication Intelligence Corporation
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(In thousands except per share amounts)
5. Stockholders' equity (continued):
Series B
On August 5, 2010, the Company completed the conversion of all of the Company’s outstanding indebtedness into shares of Series B Participating Convertible Preferred Stock (the “Series B Preferred Stock”) in accordance with an executed Exchange Agreement entered into with Phoenix Venture Fund LLC and certain other holders of the Company’s indebtedness and sold approximately 1.44 million shares of Series B Preferred Stock, in accordance with an executed Series B Preferred Stock Purchase Agreement (the “Purchase Agreement”). The Company issued approximately 6,608 shares of Series B Preferred Stock in exchange for all of the Company’s outstanding secured indebtedness and issued 1,440 shares of Series B Preferred Stock for proceeds of $1,440, net of expenses of $437. In addition, the Company paid approximately $143 in expenses to a third party in connection with the financing. The expenses were recorded as a charge to additional paid in capital. The proceeds are to be used for working capital and general corporate purposes, in each case in the ordinary course of business, and to pay fees and expenses associated with the Recapitalization.
The Series B Preferred Stock carries a ten percent (10%) annual dividend, payable quarterly in arrears in cash or in additional shares of Series B Preferred Stock, has a liquidation preference over Common Stock of one dollar ($1.50) per share and are convertible into shares of Common Stock at an initial conversion price of six cents ($0.06) per share. The Company issued additional stock, the Series C Participating Convertible Preferred Stock (the “Series C Preferred Stock”), at a price less than the current conversion price of $0.06, which resulted in a downward adjustment in the conversion price of the Series B Preferred Stock to $0.0433 per share and in an increase in the number of shares of Common Stock that would be issued upon conversion of the Series B Preferred Stock (Note4). The Series B Preferred Stock is convertible any time after August 5, 2010. The Recapitalization included a conversion feature determined to be a derivative liability in the amount of $2,000 of which $1,498 was attributable to related parties and $502 to the other creditors. Due to the decline in the price of the Company’s Common Stock and the issuance of the Series C Preferred Stock Series D-1 Preferred Stock and Series D-2 Preferred Stock. Generally, the fair valueCompany’s Preferred Stock votes together on an as converted basis with the holders of Common Stock. In addition, the Company’s Preferred Stock enjoys certain protective provisions, a liquidation preference and anti-dilution protection that are similar to one another.
The Company has amended its Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation to increase the number of authorized shares of its Series D-1 and Series D-2 Preferred Stock. The Company solicited its stockholders and its stockholders approved an amendment of the embedded conversion feature onCompany’s Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation to increase the Series B Preferred Stock was reduced to approximately $130 at December 31, 2010 (Note 4). The Company issued 206number of authorized shares of Series BD-1 Preferred Stock in paymentfrom 3,000 to 6,000, and of dividendsSeries D-2 Preferred Stock from 8,000 to 9,000 (the “Charter Amendment”). The Charter Amendment allows the Company to have additional shares of stock available for possible future capital raising activities as approved by the Board of Directors.
The Company has amended and restated the Certificates of Designation for the year ended December 31, 2010. The conversion feature recorded on the Series BA-1 Preferred Stock, dividends was $5. If the outstanding Series B Preferred Stock is converted in its entirety, the Company would issue 193,533 shares of Common Stock.
Series C
On December 31, 2010, the Company completed the sale of 2,211 shares of Series C Preferred Stock through a Purchase Agreement with Phoenix Venture Fund LLC and certain other investors for proceeds of $2,211 net of approximately $422 in expenses to third parties in connection with the financing. The Series C Preferred Stock is senior to the outstanding Series B Preferred Stock and Series C Preferred Stock to, among other things, subordinate the Series A-1 Preferred Stock, and all shares of CommonSeries B Preferred Stock with respect to dividend rights and rights on liquidation, winding-up and dissolution in accordance with its Purchase Agreement. The expenses were recorded as a charge to additional paid in capital. The proceeds are to be used for working capital and general corporate purposes, in each case in the ordinary course of business, and to pay fees and expenses associated with the sale of the Series C Preferred Stock.
The Series C Preferred Stock, carries a ten percent (10%) annualin terms of dividend payable quarterly in arrears in cash or in additionalrights, liquidation preferences and other rights, to the Series CD Preferred Stock. In preference to all otherHolders of at least a majority of the shares of the Company’s capital stock, TheSeries A-1 Preferred Stock, Series B Preferred Stock and Series C Preferred Stock will receive liquidating distributions inhave approved the amount of $1.50 per share plus any accrued dividends. The Series C Preferred Stock is convertible into Common Stock at any time at the optionamendment and restatement of the holder at an initial conversion priceCertificate of $0.0225 per share, subjectDesignation applicable to adjustment for stock dividends, splits, combinations and similar events and, with certain exceptions, the issuance of additional securities at a purchase price less than the then current conversion price of the Series C Preferred Stock. The Series C Preferred Stock is convertible any time after December 31, 2010. On December 31, 2010, the Series C Preferred Stock’s conversion feature was determined to be a derivative liability in the amount of $179, of which $113 is attributable to related parties and $66 to the othersuch holders. If the
Communication Intelligence Corporation
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(In thousands except per share amounts)
Information with respect to the classes of Preferred Stock at December 31, 2013 is as follows:
| Class of Preferred Stock | Issue Date | | Annual Dividend | | Annual Dividend Payable, in Cash or In Kind | | Liquidation Preference | | | Conversion Price | | | Total Preferred Shares Outstanding | | | Common Shares to be issued if Fully Converted | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Series A-1 | May 2008 | | | 8 | % | Quarterly in Arrears | | $ | 1.00 | | | $ | 0.1400 | | | | 1,031 | | | | 7,368 | |
| Series B | August 2010 | | | 10 | % | Quarterly in Arrears | | $ | 1.50 | | | $ | 0.0433 | | | | 11,012 | | | | 256,241 | |
| Series C | December/March 2011 | | | 10 | % | Quarterly in Arrears | | $ | 1.50 | | | $ | 0.0225 | | | | 4,508 | | | | 200,354 | |
| Series D-1 | November 2012/May and December 2013 | | | 10 | % | Quarterly in Arrears | | $ | 1.00 | | | $ | 0.0225 | | | | 3,415 | | | | 151,766 | |
| Series D-2 | November 2012/May and December 2013 | | | 10 | % | Quarterly in Arrears | | $ | 1.00 | | | $ | 0.0500 | | | | 4,783 | | | | 95,682 | |
| Total | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 711,411 | |
Information with respect to dividends issued on the Company’s Preferred stock for the years ended December 31, 2013 and 2012 is as follows:
5. Stockholders' equity (continued):| | | December 31, | | | December 31, | |
| | | 2013 | | | 2012 | | | 2013 | | | 2012 | |
| | | Dividends | | | Beneficial Conversion Feature Related to dividends | |
| Series A-1 | | $ | 78 | | | $ | 73 | | | $ ─ | | | $ ─ | |
| Series B | | | 1,044 | | | | 948 | | | ─ | | | | 268 | |
| Series C | | | 433 | | | | 389 | | | | 191 | | | | 385 | |
| Series D-1 | | | 131 | | | | 14 | | | | 59 | | | | 13 | |
| Series D-2 | | | 402 | | | | 41 | | | ─ | | | ─ | |
| Total | | $ | 2,088 | | | $ | 1,465 | | | $ | 250 | | | $ | 666 | |
Series A-1 Preferred Stock
The shares of Series A-1 Preferred Stock are convertible any time and are subordinate to the Series B, Series C and Series D Preferred Stock.
Series CB Preferred Stock
outstandingThe shares of Series B Preferred Stock are convertible at any time and are subordinate to the Series C and Series D Preferred Stock.
In January and March 2012, a total of 140 shares of Series B Preferred Stock iswere converted in its entirety,and the Company would issue 98,244issued 3,232 shares of Common Stock.
After receiptSeries C Preferred Stock
The shares of Series C Preferred Stock are convertible into Common Stock at any time and are subordinate to the Series D Preferred Stock.
Communication Intelligence Corporation
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(In thousands except per share amounts)
In January 2012, the Company received 6,500 shares of Common Stock from Phoenix in settlement of a 16b claim brought by a Company stockholder against Phoenix, certain affiliates and the Company, as a nominal defendant. The Common Stock was valued at $325. In settlement of an indemnification claim brought by Phoenix in March 2012, resulting from the settlement of the liquidation preference,16b claim in January 2012, the Company issued to Phoenix 278 shares of Series C Preferred Stock valued at $417. The Company booked a $417 accretion amount for the beneficial conversion feature on the 278 shares of Series C Preferred Stock.
In September 2012, an investor converted 39 shares of Series C Preferred Stock into 1,729 shares of the Company’s Common Stock.
In November 2013, a shareholder converted 100 shares of Series C Preferred Stock, and the Company issued 4,452 share of common stock.
Series D Preferred Stock
The material terms of the Series D-1 and Series D-2 Preferred Stock, other than the initial conversion price, are essentially the same. The shares of Series D Preferred Stock are convertible at any time and rank senior to the Company’s outstanding shares of Series A-1, Series B Preferred Stock will participate pro rata on an as-converted basis with the shares of Common Stock in any remaining liquidation proceeds (after payment of the liquidation preference on theand Series C Preferred Stock, and of Common Stock with respect to dividend rights and liquidation preferences.
In November 2012, the Company converted approximately $3,099 of short-term debt and accrued interest into shares of Series BD Preferred Stock net of offering costs of $190. The Company sold, for cash in a private placement, 1,082 of additional shares of Series D-2 Preferred Stock at a purchase price of $1.00 per share and received $967 net of offering costs of $115.
In May 2013, the Company completed a private placement of 230 units of Series D Preferred Stock consisting of one (1) share of Series D-1 Preferred Stock and Series A-1 Preferred Stock).
Warrants:
Series C Warrants
Each investor received a warrant to purchase a number of shares of Common Stock equal to the aggregate number offour (4) shares of Series CD-2 Preferred Stock. The private placement provided $1,150 in proceeds to the Company.
On December 31, 2013, the Company converted approximately $1,179 of short-term debt plus accrued interest into 786 shares of Series D-1 Preferred Stock purchased byand 393 shares of Series D-2 Preferred Stock The investors can receive up to one hundred percent (100%) warrant coverage. These warrants are immediately exercisable and expire three (3) years from the investor divided by 0.0225. Eachdate of issuance. See the warrant issued in connection with the Series C Financing has an exercise price of $0.0225 per share and istable below for more detail. The warrants are exercisable in whole or in part including by means ofand contain a cashless exercise provision.
On December 31, 2013, the Company sold for a period$870 in cash, net of $40 administrative fee paid to SG Phoenix, 607 Shares of Series D-1 preferred Stock and 303 shares of Series D-2 Preferred Stock. The investors can receive up to one hundred percent (100%) warrant coverage. These warrants are immediately exercisable and expire three (3) years from the date of issuance. IfSee the outstanding Series C Warrantswarrant table below for more detail. The warrants are executed for cashexercisable in their entirety, the Company would issue 98,244 shares of Common Stock.
Other Warrantswhole or in part and contain a cashless exercise provision.
In October 2009, a note holder and related party exercised 300 warrants, andconnection with the December 31, 2013, offering, the Company issued 300adjusted the number of shares of Series D-1 Preferred Stock and Series D-2 Preferred Stock issued to investors in the May 2013 offering described above, in order to give such investors shares of Series D-1 Preferred Stock and Series D-2 Preferred Stock in the same ratio as offered to Investors in the December 31, 2013, offering. This resulted in an exchange of 537 shares of Series D-2 Preferred into Series D-1 Preferred. The Company also issued warrants to purchase Common Stock at $0.06 per share. The Company received $18 in cash.the same manner as offered to investors in the December 31, 2013, offering.
Communication Intelligence Corporation
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(In late Octoberthousands except per share amounts)
Warrants:
Summary of Warrant exercises as of:
| | | December 31,2013 | | | December 31, 2012 | | |
| | | Warrants | | | Common Shares Issued | | | Cash received | | | Warrants | | | Common Shares Issued | | | Cash received |
| | | | 1,300 | | | | 1,300 | | | $ | 29 | | | | 28,511 | | | | 20,186 | | | $ | - | |
| | | | 11,111 | | | | 2,283 | | | $ | − | | | | 6,651 | | | | 7,439 | | | $ | 212 | |
| Total | | | 12,411 | | | | 3,583 | | | $ | 29 | | | | 35,162 | | | | 27,625 | | | $ | 212 | |
Summary of warrants issued in 2013 and early November 2009, note holders,2012:
| | | December 31, 2013 | | | December 31, 2012 | |
| | | Related Party | | | Other | | | Total | | | Related Party | | | Other | | | Total | |
| Warrants issued in connection with Notes | | | 19,584 | | | | 2,083 | | | | 21,667 | | | | − | | | | 8,643 | | | | 8,643 | |
| Warrants issued with purchase of Series D Preferred | | | 9,561 | | | | 9,428 | | | | 18,989 | | | | − | | | | − | | | ─ | |
| Warrants issued in the December Series D Preferred exchange | | | 2,827 | | | | 7,627 | | | | 10,454 | | | | − | | | | − | | | ─ | |
Total | | | 31,972 | | | | 19,138 | | | | 51,110 | | | ─ | | | | 8,643 | | | | 8,643 | |
A summary of the outstanding warrants is as follows:
| | | December 31, 2013 | | | December 31, 2012 | |
| | | Warrants | | | Weighted Average Exercise Price | | | Warrants | | | Weighted Average Exercise Price | |
| Outstanding at beginning of period | | | 151,722 | | | $ | 0.0269 | | | | 182,644 | | | $ | 0.0261 | |
| Issued | | | 51,110 | | | $ | 0.0283 | | | | 8,643 | | | $ | 0.0500 | |
| Exercised | | | (12,411 | ) | | $ | 0.0225 | | | | (35,162 | ) | | $ | 0.0264 | |
| Expired | | | (113,266 | ) | | $ | 0.0230 | | | | (4,403 | ) | | $ | − | |
| Outstanding at end of period | | | 77,155 | | | $ | 0.0289 | | | | 151,722 | | | $ | 0.0269 | |
| Exercisable at end of period | | | 77,155 | | | $ | 0.0289 | | | | 151,722 | | | $ | 0.0269 | |
A summary of the status of the warrants outstanding as of December 31, 2013 is as follows:
| Number of Warrants Outstanding and Exercisable | | Weighted Average Remaining Life | | Weighted Average Exercise Price per share | |
| | | | | | |
| | 17,401 | | | 0.60 | | $ | 0.0225 | |
| | 8,643 | | | 1.56 | | $ | 0.0500 | |
| | 51,110 | | | 2.97 | | $ | 0.0283 | |
| | 77,155 | | | 2.28 | | $ | 0.0289 | |
At December 31, 2013, 77,155 shares of common stock were reserved for issuance upon the exercise of outstanding warrants.
Communication Intelligence Corporation
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(In thousands except per share amounts)
Contingent warrants
Investors that received warrants in connection with the December 31, 2013, offering may receive up to 87,352 additional warrants, if the Company does not achieve certain revenue targets in the first three quarters of 2014 The Company ascribed a value of $1,618 to the contingent warrants issued at closing, including the contingent warrants, using a Black Sholes pricing model. The Company also recorded a beneficial conversion feature related parties, exercised 82,557 warrants on a cashless basis. The warrant exchange rate wasto the shares of Series D Preferred Stock issued in the December 31, 2013, of $919 based on the average closingaccounting conversion price of the Company’s Common Stock for the preceding five trading days prior to the date of exercise. The Company issued 58,384 shares of CommonSeries D Preferred Stock including 52,429 shares to related parties.issued.
At December 31, 2010, 135,3642013, 77,155 shares of Common Stockcommon stock were reserved for issuance upon exercise of outstanding warrants.
Restricted Share Grants
As part of the Recapitalization, the Company issued restricted shares to four employees in exchange for reductions in their respective salaries. The number of shares issued was calculated based on the amount of the annual salary reduction divided by $0.06 per share. Fifty percent of the shares vested on December 31, 2010 and the remaining 50% are scheduled to vest on June 30, 2011, subject to continued employment through such vesting dates. As of December 31, 2010, the Company will issue 678 restricted shares of Common Stock.
6. Commitments:| 10. | Commitments & Contingencies: |
Lease commitments:
The Company currently leases its principal facilities in Redwood Shores, California, pursuant to a sublease that expires in 2016. In addition to monthly rent, the facilities are subject to additional rental payments for utilities and other costs above the base amount. Facilities rent expense was approximately $281,$275, and $303,$275, in 20102013 and 2009,2012, respectively.
| | | | | | | |
| Contractual obligations | | Total | 2014 | 2015 | 2016 | Thereafter |
| Operating lease commitments | | 825 | 284 | 292 | 249 | - |
As of December 31, 2013, the Company had federal net operating loss carry-forwards available to reduce taxable income of approximately $68,449. The net operating loss carry-forwards expire between 2017 and 2033. The Company also had federal research and investment tax credit carry-forwards of approximately $137 that expire at various dates through 2017. The Company also has state net operating loss carry-forwards available to reduce taxable income of approximately $33,048. The net state operating loss carry-forwards expire between 2015 through 2033.
Deferred tax assets and liabilities at December 31, consist of the following:
| | | 2013 | | | 2012 | |
| Deferred tax assets: | | | | | | |
| Net operating loss carry-forwards | | $ | 27,266 | | | $ | 28,243 | |
| Credit carry-forwards | | | 137 | | | | 165 | |
| Deferred income | | | 224 | | | | 399 | |
| Intangibles | | | 1,046 | | | | 484 | |
| Other, net | | | 373 | | | | 74 | |
| | | | | | | | | |
| Total deferred tax assets | | | 29,046 | | | | 29,365 | |
| | | | | | | | | |
| Valuation allowance | | $ | (29,046 | ) | | $ | (29,365 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | |
| Net deferred tax assets | | | - | | | | - | |
Communication Intelligence Corporation
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(In thousands except per share amounts)
7. Income taxes:
As of December 31, 2010, the Company had federal net operating loss carry-forwards available to reduce taxable income of approximately $63,430. The net operating loss carry-forwards expire between 2011 and 2030. The Company also had federal research and investment tax credit carry-forwards of approximately $165 that expire at various dates through 2012. The Company also has state net operating loss carry-forwards available to reduce taxable income of approximately $31,700. The net operating loss carry-forwards expire between 2013 through 2030.
Deferred tax assets and liabilities at December 31, consist of the following:
| | | 2010 | | | 2009 | |
| Deferred tax assets: | | | | | | |
| Net operating loss carry-forwards | | $ | 25,373 | | | $ | 23,543 | |
| Credit carry-forwards | | | 165 | | | | 202 | |
| Deferred income | | | 456 | | | | 582 | |
| Intangibles | | | 1,175 | | | | 684 | |
| Other, net | | | 210 | | | | 156 | |
| | | | | | | | | |
| Total deferred tax assets | | | 27,379 | | | | 25,167 | |
| | | | | | | | | |
| Valuation allowance | | | (27,379 | ) | | | (25,167 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | |
| Net deferred tax assets | | $ | - | | | $ | - | |
Income tax benefit differs from the expected statutory rate as follows:
| | | 2010 | | | 2009 | | | 2013 | | | 2012 | |
| Expected federal income tax benefit | | $ | (1,414 | ) | | $ | (3,673 | ) | | $ | (2,668 | ) | | $ | (1,534 | ) |
| State income tax benefit | | | (250 | ) | | | (648 | ) | | | (458 | ) | | | (195 | ) |
| Prior year true up to return | | | | 1,416 | | | ─ | |
| Non-deductible tax expense | | | | 1,711 | | | ─ | |
| Other | | | (548 | ) | | | 2,318 | | | | (320 | ) | | | (239 | ) |
| Change in valuation allowance | | | 2,212 | | | | 2,003 | | | | 319 | | | | 1,968 | |
| Income tax benefit | | $ | – | | | $ | – | | | $ | – | | | $ | – | |
A full valuation allowance has been established for the Company's net deferred tax assets since the realization of such assets through the generation of future taxable income is uncertain.
Under the Tax Reform Act of 1986, the amounts of, and the benefit from, net operating losses and tax credit carry-forwards may be impaired or limited in certain circumstances. These circumstances include, but are not limited to, a cumulative stock ownership change of greater than 50%, as defined, over a three-year period. During 1997, the Company experienced stock ownership changes which could limit the utilization of its net operating loss and research and investment tax credit carry-forwards in future periods. In addition, a study of recent transactions has not been preformedperformed to determine whether any further limitations might apply.
8. Employee benefit plans:
On February 7, 2014, the Company entered into subscription agreements (the “Subscription Agreements”) with certain investors (each, an “Investor,” and, collectively, the “Investors”). Under the terms of the Subscription Agreements, the Investors purchased an aggregate of 260 Units (each a “Unit,” and, collectively, the “Units”) at a purchase price of $3.00 per Unit for an aggregate purchase price of approximately $780. Each Unit consists of two (2) shares of the Company’s Series D-1 Preferred Stock and one (1) share of Series D-2 Preferred Stock. The Series D-1 Preferred Stock and Series D-2 Preferred Stock are identical in rights, preferences, and privileges, except for their conversion price to Common Stock. Shares of Series D-1 Preferred Stock are convertible into shares of Common Stock at an initial conversion price of $0.0225 per share (subject to certain anti-dilution adjustment). Shares of Series D-2 Preferred Stock are convertible into shares of Common Stock at an initial conversion price of $0.05 per share (subject to certain anti-dilution adjustment).
The Company sponsorsInvestors were also issued warrants to purchase approximately 7.091 million shares of Common Stock at the time of the funding of their investment. These warrants are exercisable for a 401(k) defined contribution plan covering all employees meeting certain eligibility requirements. Contributions made byperiod of three years and have an exercise price of $0.0275 per share. In addition to the warrants issued at closing, the Subscription Agreements entitle Investors to receive warrants to purchase up to an additional 21.273 million shares of Common Stock based on whether the Company are determined annually by the Boardattains certain revenue targets in 2014., as discussed in Note 9. Any such additional warrants will be exercisable until December 31, 2016 and will have an exercise price of Directors. To date, the Company has made no contributions to this plan.$0.0275 per share.