0000740260vtr:BristolParkOfTamarac7230Membervtr:OtherThirdPartyMembervtr:SeniorsHousingCommunitiesMember2020-01-012020-12-31


UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-K
(Mark One)
xANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the fiscal year ended December 31, 20172020
OR
¨TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE
ACT OF 1934 FOR THE TRANSITION PERIOD FROM 
For the transition period from            to          TO
Commission File Numberfile number: 1-10989
VENTAS, INC.Ventas, Inc.
(Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in Its Charter)
Delaware
61-1055020
(State or Other Jurisdiction of
Incorporation or Organization)
61-1055020
(IRSI.R.S. Employer
Identification No.)
353 N. Clark Street, Suite 3300
353 N. Clark Street, Suite 3300, Chicago, Illinois
60654
(Address of Principal Executive Offices)
60654
(Zip Code)
(877) 483-6827
(Registrant’s Telephone Number, Including Area Code)
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:
Trading SymbolTitle of Each ClassName of Each Exchange on Which Registered
VTRCommon Stock, $0.25 par value $0.25 per shareNew York Stock Exchange
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act: None
Indicate by check mark if the Registrantregistrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act.Yesx    No ¨
Indicate by check mark if the Registrantregistrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act. Yes¨No x
Indicate by check mark whether the Registrantregistrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the Registrantregistrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.Yesx    No ¨
Indicate by check mark whether the Registrantregistrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate website, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the Registrantregistrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes x    No ¨
Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of Registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment of this Form 10-K. x
Indicate by check mark whether the Registrantregistrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company or an emerging growth company. See definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer”filer,” “smaller reporting company” and “smaller reporting“emerging growth company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act
Act.
Large accelerated filerx
Accelerated filer¨¨
Non-accelerated filer¨
 (Do not check if a smaller reporting company)

Smaller reporting company ¨
Emerging growth company  
If an emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with any new or revised financial accounting standards provided pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act. ¨
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has filed a report on and attestation to its management’s assessment of the effectiveness of its internal control over financial reporting under Section 404(b) of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act (15 U.S.C. 7262(b)) by the registered public accounting firm that prepared or issued its audit report.

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Act). Yes ¨☐    No x
The aggregate market value of shares of the Registrant’sregistrant’s common stock held by non-affiliates of the Registrantregistrant on June 30, 2017,2020, based on a closing price of the common stock of $69.48$36.62 as reported on the New York Stock Exchange, was $18.8$11.7 billion. For purposes of the foregoing calculation only, all directors, executive officers and 10% beneficial owners of the Registrant have been deemed affiliates.
As of January 31, 2018,February 18, 2021, there were 356,198,053374,659,068 shares of the Registrant’sregistrant’s common stock outstanding.



DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE
Portions of the Registrant’sregistrant’s definitive Proxy Statement for the Annual Meeting of Stockholders to be held on May 15, 201825, 2021 are incorporated by reference into Part III, Items 10 through 14 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.




CAUTIONARY STATEMENTS


Unless otherwise indicated or except where the context otherwise requires, the terms “we,” “us” and “our” and other similar terms in this Annual Report on Form 10-K (the “Annual Report”) refer to Ventas, Inc. and its consolidated subsidiaries.


Forward-Looking Statements


This Annual Report on Form 10-K includes forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the “Securities Act”), and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”). AllThese forward-looking statements include, among others, statements of expectations, beliefs, future plans and strategies, anticipated results from operations and developments and other matters that are not historical facts. Forward-looking statements include, among other things, statements regarding our and our officers’ intent, belief or our tenants’, operators’, borrowers’ or managers’ expected future financial condition, resultsexpectation as identified by the use of operations, cash flows, funds from operations, dividends and dividend plans, financing opportunities and plans, capital markets transactions, business strategy, budgets, projected costs, operating metrics, capital expenditures, competitive positions, acquisitions, investment opportunities, dispositions, merger integration, growth opportunities, expected lease income, continued qualification as a real estate investment trust (“REIT”), plans and objectives of management for future operations, and statements that include words such as “anticipate,“may,“if,“will,” “project,” “expect,” “believe,” “intend,” “anticipate,” “seek,” “target,” “forecast,” “plan,” “potential,” “estimate,” “expect,” “intend,” “may,” “could,” “should,“would,“will,”“should” and other similar expressions are forward-looking statements. Thesecomparable and derivative terms or the negatives thereof. The forward-looking statements are inherently uncertain,based on management’s beliefs as well as on a number of assumptions concerning future events. You should not put undue reliance on these forward-looking statements, which are not a guarantee of performance and are subject to a number of uncertainties and other factors that could cause actual events or results to differ materially from those expressed or implied by the forward-looking statements. You are urged to carefully review the disclosures we make concerning risks and uncertainties that may differ fromaffect our expectations. business and future financial performance, including those made below under “Summary Risk Factors” and in “Item 1A, Risk Factors” in this report.

We do not undertake a duty to update these forward-looking statements, which speak only as of the date on which they are made.


Summary Risk Factors

COVID-19 Risks

The ongoing COVID-19 pandemic and measures intended to prevent its spread have had and may continue to have a material adverse effect on our business;
There is a high degree of uncertainty regarding the implementation and impact of the CARES Act and other pandemic-related legislation and any future COVID-19 relief measures;

Our Business Operations and Strategy Risks

Market and general economic conditions, including economic and financial market events and the actual future results and trendsperceived state of the real estate markets and public capital markets, could negatively impact our business;
Third parties must operate our non-Office assets, limiting our control and influence over operations and results;
Our operating assets may differ materially from expectations depending on a variety of factors discussedexpose us to various operational risks, liabilities and claims that could adversely affect our ability to generate revenues or increase our costs;
Decreases in our filings with the Securitiestenants’, borrowers’ or managers’ revenues, or increases in their expenses, could affect their ability to meet their financial and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”). These factors include without limitation:other contractual obligations to us, which could adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations;

The ability and willingnessBankruptcy, insolvency or financial deterioration of our tenants, operators, borrowers, managers and other third partiesobligors may adversely affect us;
A significant portion of our revenues and operating income is dependent on a limited number of tenants and managers;
If we need to satisfy their obligations under their respective contractual arrangements with us, including, in some cases, their obligations to indemnify, defend and hold us harmless from and against various claims, litigation and liabilities;

The abilityreplace any of our tenants operators, borrowersor managers, we may be unable to do so on as favorable terms or at all, and managerswe could be subject to maintain the financial strengthdelays, limitations and liquidity necessary to satisfy their respective obligations and liabilities to third parties, including without limitation obligations under their existing credit facilities and other indebtedness;expenses;

Our success depends, in implementing our business strategy andpart, on our ability to identify, underwrite, finance, consummateattract and integrate diversifying acquisitionsretain talented employees, and investments;the loss of any one of our key personnel could adversely impact our business;

Macroeconomic conditions such asOur investments are concentrated in a disruptionvariety of or lack of accessasset classes within healthcare real estate, making us more vulnerable to the capital markets,adverse changes in those asset classes and the debt ratingreal estate industry generally;
Our investments may be unsuccessful or fail to meet our expectations;
If we are unable to identify and consummate future investments and effectively manage our expansion opportunities and our investments in co-investment vehicles, joint ventures and minority interests, we may be adversely affected;
Development, redevelopment and construction risks could affect our profitability and expose us to liability;
In the event of borrower defaults, we may be unable to foreclose successfully on U.S. government securities, defaultthe collateral securing our loans and other investments or, delay in payment byif we are able to foreclose, realize the United Statesfull value of its obligations,the collateral;
i


We own certain properties subject to ground lease, air rights or other restrictive agreements that limit our uses of the properties and changes inrestrict our ability to sell or otherwise transfer the federal or state budgets resulting in the reduction or nonpayment of Medicare or Medicaid reimbursement rates;properties;


The natureEnvironmental, Economic and extent of future competition, including newMarket Risks

Increased construction and development in the markets in which our seniors housing communitiesproperties are located could adversely affect our profitability;
General economic conditions and office buildingsother events or occurrences that affect areas in which our properties are located;geographically concentrated may impact financial results;

If we or our tenants, borrowers and managers are unable to navigate the trends impacting our or their businesses, such as limits on demand for site-based activities, and the industries in which we or they operate, or if our tenants fail to remain competitive or financially viable, we may be adversely affected;
The extentOur life science, R&I tenants face unique levels of regulation, expense and effect of future or pending healthcare reformuncertainty;
Merger, acquisition and regulation, including cost containment measures and changes in reimbursement policies, procedures and rates;

Increasesinvestment activity in our borrowingindustries could adversely affect our business;
Damage from catastrophic or extreme weather and other natural events and the physical effects of climate change could result in significant losses;

Our Capital Structure Risks

We may become more leveraged, which could impact our ability to obtain financing and to execute our business strategy;
We are highly dependent on access to the capital markets. Limitations on our ability to access capital could have an adverse effect on us;
We are exposed to increases in interest rates and fluctuations in currency exchange rates, which could affect our financial results;
Changes in the method pursuant to which the LIBOR rates are determined and potential phasing out of LIBOR may affect our financial results;
Covenants in the instruments governing our and our subsidiaries’ existing indebtedness limit our operational flexibility, and a covenant breach could materially adversely affect our operations.

Our Legal, Compliance and Regulatory Risks

Significant legal or regulatory proceedings could subject us or our tenants or managers to increased operating costs and substantial uninsured liabilities;
We and our tenants, borrowers and managers may be adversely affected by regulation and enforcement;
Our investments may expose us to unknown liabilities;
We could incur substantial liabilities and costs if any of our properties are found to be contaminated with hazardous substances or we become involved in any environmental disputes;
The occurrence of cyber incidents could disrupt our operations, result in the loss of confidential information or damage our business relationships and reputation;
The amount and scope of insurance coverage provided by our policies and policies maintained by our tenants, managers or other counterparties may not adequately insure against losses;
Failure to maintain effective internal controls could harm our business;

Our REIT Status Risks

We are subject to certain limitations and requirements as a result of changes in interest ratesour status as a REIT, which may affect our ability to and other factors;

The ability of our tenants, operators and managers, as applicable, to comply with laws, rules and regulations inimpose limitations on the operation of our properties,business and subject us to deliver high-quality services,significant risk if we are not able to attract and retain qualified personnel and to attract residents and patients;comply;

Changes in general economic conditions or economic conditions in the markets in which we may, from time to time, compete, and the effectLoss of those changes on our revenues, earnings and funding sources;

Our ability to pay down, refinance, restructure or extend our indebtedness as it becomes due;

Our ability and willingness to maintain our qualificationstatus as a REIT in light of economic, market, legal, taxwould have significant adverse consequences for us; and other considerations;


i


Final determination ofOwnership limits with respect to our taxable net income for the year ended December 31, 2017 and for the year ending December 31, 2018;

The ability and willingness of our tenants to renew their leases with us upon expiration of the leases, our ability to reposition our properties on the samecapital stock may delay, defer or better terms in the event of nonrenewal or in the event we exercise our right to replace an existing tenant, and obligations, including indemnification obligations, we may incur in connection with the replacement of an existing tenant;

Risks associated with our senior living operating portfolio, such as factors that can cause volatility in our operating income and earnings generated by those properties, including without limitation national and regional economic conditions, development of new competing properties, costs of food, materials, energy, labor and services, employee benefit costs, insurance costs and professional and general liability claims, and the timely delivery of accurate property-level financial results for those properties;

Changes in exchange rates for any foreign currency in which we may, from time to time, conduct business;

Year-over-year changes in the Consumer Price Index (“CPI”) or the U.K. Retail Price Index and the effect of those changes on the rent escalators contained in our leases and on our earnings;

Our ability and the ability of our tenants, operators, borrowers and managers to obtain and maintain adequate property, liability and other insurance from reputable, financially stable providers;

The impact of increased operating costs and uninsured professional liability claims on our liquidity, financial condition and results of operations or that of our tenants, operators, borrowers and managers and our ability and the ability of our tenants, operators, borrowers and managers to accurately estimate the magnitude of those claims;

Risks associated with our office building portfolio and operations, including our ability to successfully design, develop and manage office buildings and to retain key personnel;

The ability of the hospitals on or near whose campuses our medical office buildings (“MOBs”) are located and their affiliated health systems to remain competitive and financially viable and to attract physicians and physician groups;

Risks associated with our investments in joint ventures and unconsolidated entities, including our lack of sole decision-making authority and our reliance on our joint venture partners’ financial condition;

Our ability to obtain the financial results expected from our development and redevelopment projects, including projects undertaken through our joint ventures;

The impact of market or issuer events on the liquidity or value of our investments in marketable securities;

Consolidation in the seniors housing and healthcare industries resulting inprevent a change of control of our company;
Legislative or a competitor’s investment in, one or more of our tenants, operators, borrowers or managers or significant changes in the senior management of our tenants, operators, borrowers or managers;

The impact of litigation or any financial, accounting, legal or regulatory issues that may affect us or our tenants, operators, borrowers or managers; and

Changes in accounting principles, or their application or interpretation, and our ability to make estimates and the assumptions underlying the estimates, whichother actions affecting REITs could have ana negative effect on our earnings.stockholders or us.


Many of these factors, some of which are described in greater detail under “Risk Factors” in Part I, Item 1A of this Annual Report, on Form 10-K, are beyond our control and the control of our management.

Brookdale Senior Living, Kindred, Atria, Sunrise and Ardent Information

Each of Brookdale Senior Living Inc. (together with its subsidiaries, “Brookdale Senior Living”) and Kindred Healthcare, Inc. (together with its subsidiaries, “Kindred”) is subject to the reporting requirements of the SEC and is required to

ii



file with the SEC annual reports containing audited financial information and quarterly reports containing unaudited financial information. The information related to Brookdale Senior Living and Kindred contained or referred to in this
Note Regarding Third-Party Information

This Annual Report on Form 10-Kincludes information that has been derived from SEC filings made by Brookdale Senior Living or Kindred, as the case may be,our publicly listed tenants or other publicly available information or was provided to us by Brookdale Senior Living or Kindred,our tenants and managers.We believe that such information is accurate and that the sources from which it has been obtained are reliable; however, we cannot guarantee the accuracy of such information and have not independently verified this information through an independent investigation or otherwise. We have no reason to believe that thisthe assumptions on which such information is inaccurate in any material respect, but we cannot assure you of its accuracy. We are providing this data for informational purposes only, and you are encouraged to obtain Brookdale Senior Living’s and Kindred’s publicly available filings, which can be found on the SEC’s website at www.sec.gov.based.

Atria Senior Living, Inc. (“Atria”), Sunrise Senior Living, LLC (together with its subsidiaries, “Sunrise”) and Ardent Health Partners, LLC (together with its subsidiaries, “Ardent”) are not currently subject to the reporting requirements of the SEC. The information related to Atria, Sunrise and Ardent contained or referred to in this Annual Report on Form 10-K has been derived from publicly available information or was provided to us by Atria, Sunrise or Ardent, as the case may be, and we have not verified this information through an independent investigation or otherwise. We have no reason to believe that this information is inaccurate in any material respect, but we cannot assure you of its accuracy.

iii



TABLE OF CONTENTS

Item 1.
Item 1A.
Item 1B.
Item 2.
Item 3.
Item 4.
Item 5.
Item 6.
Item 7.
Item 7A.
Item 8.
Item 9.
Item 9A.
Item 9B.
Item 10.
Item 11.
Item 12.
Item 13.
Item 14.
Item 15.
Item 16.


iv



PART I


ITEM 1.    Business


BUSINESS


Overview


Ventas, Inc., an S&P 500 company, is a real estate investment trust (“REIT”) operating at the intersection of healthcare and real estate, with a highly diversified portfolio of seniors housingsenior housing; life science, research and innovation; and healthcare propertiesproperties; which we generally refer to as “healthcare real estate,” located throughout the United States, Canada and the United Kingdom. As of December 31, 2017,2020, we owned more thanor managed through unconsolidated real estate entities approximately 1,200 properties (including properties owned through investments in unconsolidated entities and properties classified as held for sale), consisting of seniorssenior housing communities, medical office buildings (“MOBs”), life science, research and innovation centers, inpatient rehabilitation facilities (“IRFs”) and long-term acute care facilities (“LTACs”), and health systems and skilled nursing facilities (“SNFs”), and we had 14 properties under development, including four properties that are owned by unconsolidated real estate entities.systems. Our company was originally founded in 1983 and is headquartered in Chicago, Illinois. Illinois with an additional office in Louisville, Kentucky.


We primarily invest in seniorsa diversified portfolio of healthcare real estate assets through wholly owned subsidiaries and other co-investment entities. We operate through three reportable business segments: triple-net leased properties, senior living operations, which we also refer to as SHOP, and office operations.See our Consolidated Financial Statements and the related notes, including “Note 2 – Accounting Policies” and “Note 19 – Segment Information,” included in Part II, Item 8 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K (the “Annual Report”).Our senior housing and healthcare properties through acquisitions and leaseare either operated under triple-net leases in our triple-net leased properties to unaffiliated tenantssegment or operate them through independent third-party managers. managers in our senior living operations segment.

As of December 31, 2017,2020, we leased a total of 546366 properties (excluding MOBs)properties within our office operations reportable business segment) to various healthcare operating companies under “triple-net” or “absolute-net” leases that obligate the tenants to pay all property-related expenses, including maintenance, utilities, repairs, taxes, insurance and capital expenditures. Our three largest tenants, Brookdale Senior Living Inc. (together with its subsidiaries, “Brookdale Senior Living”), Ardent Health Partners, LLC (together with its subsidiaries, “Ardent”) and Kindred Healthcare, LLC (together with its subsidiaries, “Kindred”) leased from us 121 properties (excluding eight properties managed by Brookdale Senior Living pursuant to long-term management agreements), 12 properties and 32 properties, respectively, as of December 31, 2020.


As of December 31, 2017,2020, pursuant to long-term management agreements, we engaged independent operators, such as Atria Senior Living, Inc. (“Atria”) and Sunrise Senior Living, LLC (together with its subsidiaries, “Sunrise”), to manage 297 seniors441 senior housing communities in our senior living operations segment for us.


Our three largest tenants, Brookdale Senior Living, Inc. (together with its subsidiaries, “Brookdale Senior Living”), Ardent Health Partners, LLC (together with its subsidiaries, “Ardent”) and Kindred Healthcare, Inc. (together with its subsidiaries, “Kindred”) leased from us 135 properties (excluding one property managed by Brookdale Senior Living pursuant to a long-term management agreement), 10 properties and 31 properties (excluding one MOB included within our office operations reportable business segment), respectively, as of December 31, 2017.

Through our Lillibridge Healthcare Services, Inc. (“Lillibridge”) subsidiary and our ownership interest in PMB Real Estate Services LLC (“PMBRES”), we also provide MOB management, leasing, marketing, facility development and advisory services to highly rated hospitals and health systems throughout the United States. In addition, from time to time, we make secured and non-mortgage loans and other investments relating to seniorssenior housing and healthcare operators or properties.


We operate through three reportable business segments: triple-net leased properties, senior living operationsDuring fiscal 2020 and office operations.continuing into fiscal 2021, the world has been, and continues to be, impacted by the novel coronavirus (“COVID-19”) pandemic. COVID-19 and actions taken to prevent its spread have negatively affected our businesses in a number of ways and are expected to continue to do so. See our Consolidated“Risk Factors” in Part I, Item 1A, “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” in Part II, Item 7and “Consolidated Financial Statements and the related notes including “NOTE 2—ACCOUNTING POLICIES” and “NOTE 19—SEGMENT INFORMATION,”thereto” included in Part II, Item 8, in each case, of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.Report.


Business Strategy


We aim to enhance shareholder value by delivering consistent, superior total returns through a strategy of:of (1) generating reliable and growing cash flows;flows, (2) maintaining a balanced, diversified portfolio of high-quality assets;assets and (3) preserving our financial strength, flexibility and liquidity.


Generating Reliable and Growing Cash Flows


Generating reliable and growing cash flows from our seniorssenior housing and healthcare assets enables us to pay regular cash dividends to stockholders and creates opportunities to increase stockholder value through profitable investments. The
1


combination of steady contractual growth from our long-term triple-net leases, steady, reliable cash flows from our loan investments and stable cash flows from our office buildings with the higher growth potential inherent in our seniorssenior housing operating communities drives our ability to generate sustainable, growing cash flows that are resilient to economic downturns.



Maintaining a Balanced, Diversified Portfolio of High-Quality Assets


We believe that maintaining a balanced portfolio of high-quality assets diversified by investment type, geographic location, asset type, tenant/tenant or operator, revenue source and operating model diminishes the risk that any single factor or event could materially harm our business. Portfolio diversification also enhances the reliability of our cash flows by reducing our exposure to any particular asset class or market, or individual tenant, operatorborrower or manager and making us less susceptible to single-statecertain risks, including risks related to regulatory or reimbursement changes, regional climate events and local economic downturns.downturns or global health events.


Preserving Our Financial Strength, Flexibility and Liquidity


A strong, flexible balance sheet and excellent liquidity position us favorably to capitalize on strategic growth opportunities in the seniorssenior housing and healthcare industries through acquisitions, investments and development and redevelopment projects. We maintain our financial strength to pursue profitable investment opportunities by actively managing our leverage, improving our cost of capital and preserving our access to multiple sources of capital and liquidity, including unsecured bank debt, mortgage financings and public and private debt and equity markets.

2017 Highlights and Other Recent Developments

Investments and Dispositions

In March 2017, we provided secured debt financing to a subsidiary of Ardent to facilitate Ardent’s acquisition of LHP Hospital Group, Inc., which included a $700.0 million term loan and a $60.0 million revolving line of credit feature (of which $28.0 million was outstanding at December 31, 2017). The LIBOR-based debt financing has a five-year term, a one-year lock out feature and a weighted average interest rate of approximately 9.3% as of December 31, 2017 and is guaranteed by Ardent’s parent company.

During the year ended December 31, 2017, we acquired 15 triple-net leased properties (including six assets previously owned by an equity method investee), four properties reported within our office operations reportable business segment (three life science, research and medical assets and one MOB) and three seniors housing communities (reported within our senior living operations reportable business segment) for an aggregate purchase price of $691.3 million.

During the year ended December 31, 2017, we sold 53 triple-net leased properties, five MOBs and certain vacant land parcels for aggregate consideration of $870.8 million, and we recognized a gain on the sale of these assets of $717.3 million, net of taxes.

During the year ended December 31, 2017, we received aggregate proceeds of $37.6 million for the partial prepayment and $35.5 million for the full repayment of loans receivable, which resulted in total gains of $0.6 million.     

Liquidity, Capital and Dividends

In March 2017, we issued and sold $400.0 million aggregate principal amount of 3.100% senior notes due 2023 at a public offering price equal to 99.280% of par, for total proceeds of $397.1 million before the underwriting discount and expenses, and $400.0 million aggregate principal amount of 3.850% senior notes due 2027 at a public offering price equal to 99.196% of par, for total proceeds of $396.8 million before the underwriting discount and expenses.

In April 2017, we entered into an unsecured credit facility comprised of a $3.0 billion unsecured revolving credit facility, priced at LIBOR plus 0.875%, that replaced our previous $2.0 billion unsecured revolving credit facility priced at LIBOR plus 1.0%.

In April 2017, we repaid in full, at par, $300.0 million aggregate principal amount then outstanding of our 1.250% senior notes due 2017 upon maturity.

In June 2017, we issued and sold C$275.0 million aggregate principal amount of 2.55% senior notes, Series D due 2023 at a price equal to 99.954% of par, for total proceeds of C$274.9 million before the agent fees and expenses. We used part of the proceeds to repay C$124.4 million on our unsecured term loan due 2019.

In August 2017, we used most of the proceeds from the sale of 22 SNFs to repay the balances then outstanding on the 2018 and 2019 term loans.

In September 2017, we entered into a new $400.0 million secured revolving construction credit facility which matures in 2022 and will be primarily used to finance life science and innovation center and other construction projects.

During the year ended December 31, 2017, we issued and sold 1.1 million shares of common stock under our “at-the-market” (“ATM”) equity offering program. Aggregate net proceeds for these activities were $73.9 million, after sales agent commissions.

During the year ended December 31, 2017, we paid the first three quarterly installments of our 2017 dividend of $0.775 per share. In December 2017, we declared the fourth quarter cash dividend on our common stock of $0.79 per share, which grew by 2% over third quarter 2017 and was paid in January 2018.

Portfolio

The sale of the triple-net leased properties above included 36 SNFs, owned by us and operated by Kindred. These assets were sold for aggregate consideration of approximately $700 million and we recognized a gain on the sale of $657.6 million, net of taxes.

Other Recent Developments

In January 2018, we transitioned the management of 76 private pay seniors housing communities to Eclipse Senior Living (“ESL”). These assets, substantially all of which were previously leased by Elmcroft Senior Living (“Elmcroft”), are now operated by ESL under a management contract with us. We acquired a 34% ownership stake in ESL with customary rights and protections. ESL management owns the remaining 66% stake. We also intend to form a new joint venture with an institutional partner related to the assets previously leased by Elmcroft. However, there can be no assurance whether, when or on what terms the joint venture will be completed.

Portfolio Summary


The following table summarizes our consolidated portfolio of properties and other investments, including construction in progress, as of and for the year ended December 31, 2017:2020:
Real Estate Property InvestmentsRevenues
Asset Type
# of
Properties (1)
# of Units/
Sq. Ft./ Beds(2)
Real Estate Property Investment, at CostPercent of
Total Real Estate Property Investments
Real Estate
Property
Investment Per Unit/Bed/Sq. Ft.
RevenuePercent of Total Revenues
 (Dollars in thousands)
Senior housing communities730 71,629 $18,313,74664.4 %$255.7 $2,589,99168.4 %
MOBs(3)
343 19,591,131 5,704,700 20.1 0.3 597,229 15.7 
Research and innovation centers31 5,451,703 2,031,666 7.1 0.4 216,624 5.7 
IRFs and LTACs37 3,139 496,259 1.7 158.1 164,239 4.3 
Health systems13 2,064 1,522,287 5.4 737.5 121,179 3.2 
SNFs16 1,732 193,808 0.7 111.9 17,011 0.4 
Development properties and other10 165,234 0.6 
Total real estate investments, at cost1,180 $28,427,700 100.0 %
Income from loans and investments80,505 2.1 
Interest and other income   7,609 0.2 
Revenues related to assets classified as held for sale2970 0.0 
Total revenues   $3,795,357 100.0 %
      Real Estate Property Investments Revenues
Asset Type 
# of
Properties (1)
 
# of Units/
Sq. Ft./Beds(2)
 Real Estate Property Investment, at Cost 
Percent of
Total Real Estate Property Investments
 
Real Estate
Property
Investment Per Unit/Bed/Sq. Ft.
 Revenue Percent of Total Revenues
  (Dollars in thousands)
Seniors housing communities 747
 65,428
 $16,616,501 63.4% $254.0
 $2,342,247 65.5%
MOBs(3)
 354
 19,221,003
 5,332,817
 20.3
 0.3
 579,363
 16.2
Life science and innovation centers 29
 5,156,868
 1,940,099
 7.4
 0.4
 174,391
 4.9
IRFs and LTACs 37
 3,115
 459,753
 1.8
 147.6
 154,094
 4.3
Health systems 12
 2,064
 1,475,975
 5.6
 715.1
 109,546
 3.1
SNFs 17
 1,882
 204,488
 0.8
 108.7
 64,086
 1.8
Development properties and other 10
   176,200
 0.7
      
Total real estate investments, at cost 1,206
   $26,205,833
 100.0%   

 

Income from loans and investments           117,608
 3.3
Interest and other income  
  
   

  
 6,034
 0.2
Revenues related to assets classified as held for sale 8
         26,780
 0.7
Total revenues  
  
 

 

  
 $3,574,149
 100.0%


(1)
As of December 31, 2017, we also owned 17 seniors housing communities, 13 SNFs and one MOB through investments in unconsolidated entities. Our consolidated properties were located in 46 states, the District of Columbia, seven Canadian provinces and the United Kingdom and were operated or managed by 91 unaffiliated healthcare operating companies, including the following publicly traded companies or their subsidiaries: Brookdale Senior Living (129 properties) (excluding six properties owned through investments in unconsolidated entities and one property managed by Brookdale Senior Living pursuant to a long-term management agreement and included in the senior living operations reportable business segment); Kindred (31 properties) (excluding one MOB included in the office operations reportable business segment); 21st Century Oncology Holdings, Inc. (12 properties); Capital Senior Living Corporation (seven properties); Spire Healthcare plc (three properties); and HealthSouth Corp. (four properties).
(2)
Seniors housing communities are measured in units; MOBs and life science and innovation centers are measured by square footage; and IRFs and LTACs, health systems and SNFs are measured by bed count.

(3)
As of December 31, 2017, we leased 65 of our consolidated MOBs pursuant to triple-net leases, Lillibridge or PMBRES managed 270 of our consolidated MOBs and 19 of our consolidated MOBs were managed by seven unaffiliated managers. Through Lillibridge and PMBRES, we also provided management and leasing services for 105 MOBs owned by third parties as of December 31, 2017.

Seniors Housing and Healthcare Properties

(1)As of December 31, 2017,2020, we also owned a totalnine senior housing communities, nine research and innovation centers and two MOBs through investments in unconsolidated real estate entities. Our consolidated properties were located in 45 states, the District of 1,235 seniorsColumbia, seven Canadian provinces and the United Kingdom and were operated or managed by 82 unaffiliated healthcare operating companies.
(2)Senior housing communities are generally measured in units; MOBs and healthcare properties (including properties classifiedresearch and innovation centers are measured by square footage; and IRFs and LTACs, health systems and skilled nursing facilities (“SNFs”) are generally measured by licensed bed count.
(3)As of December 31, 2020, we leased 66 of our consolidated MOBs pursuant to triple-net leases, Lillibridge or PMBRES managed 268 of our consolidated MOBs and nine of our consolidated MOBs were managed by five unaffiliated managers. Through Lillibridge, we also provided management and leasing services for 73 MOBs owned by third parties as held for sale) as follows:
 
Consolidated
(100% interest)
 
Consolidated
(<100% interest)
 
Unconsolidated
(5-25% interest)
 Total
Seniors housing communities738
 9
 17
 764
MOBs314
 48
 1
 363
Life science and innovation centers18
 11
 
 29
IRFs and LTACs

36
 1
 
 37
Health systems12
 
 
 12
SNFs17
 
 13
 30
Total1,135
 69
 31
 1,235
of December 31, 2020.
    
SeniorsSenior Housing Communities


Our seniorssenior housing communities include independent and assisted living communities, continuing care retirement communities and communities providing care for individuals with Alzheimer’s disease and other forms of dementia or memory loss. These communities offer studio, one bedroomone- and two bedroomtwo-bedroom residential units on a month-to-month basis primarily to elderly individuals requiring various levels of assistance. Basic services for residents of these communities include housekeeping,
2


meals in a central dining area and group activities organized by the staff with input from the residents. More extensive care and personal supervision, at additional fees, are also available for such needs as eating, bathing, grooming, transportation, limited therapeutic programs and medication administration, which allow residents certain conveniences and enable them to live as independently as possible according to their abilities. These services are often met by home health providers and through close coordination with the resident’s physician and SNFs. Charges for room, board and services are generally paid from private sources.


Medical Office Buildings


Typically, our MOBs are multi-tenant properties leased to several unrelated medical practices, although in many cases they may be associated with a large single specialty or multi-specialty group. Tenants include physicians, dentists, psychologists, therapists and other healthcare providers, who require space devoted to patient examination and treatment, diagnostic imaging, outpatient surgery and other outpatient services. MOBs are similar to commercial office buildings, although they require greater plumbing, electrical and mechanical systems to accommodate physicians’ requirements such as sinks in every room, brighter lights and specialized medical equipment. As of December 31, 2017,2020, we owned or managed through unconsolidated real estate entities for third parties approximately 2321 million square feet of MOBs that are predominantly located on or near a health system.


Life ScienceResearch and Innovation Centers, Life Science


Our life science, research and innovation centers contain laboratory and office space primarily for scientific research for universities, academic medical centers, technology, biotechnology, medical device and pharmaceutical companies and other organizations involved in the life science, research and innovation industry. While these properties have characteristics similar to commercial office buildings, they generally contain more advanced electrical, mechanical, and heating, ventilating and air conditioning systems. The facilities generally have specialty equipment including emergency generators, fume hoods, lab bench tops and related amenities. In many instances, life scienceresearch and innovation center tenants make significant investments to improve their leased space, in addition to landlord improvements, to accommodate biology, chemistry or medical device research initiatives. Our life scienceresearch and innovation centers are primarilyoften located on or contiguous to university and academic medical campuses. The campus settings allow usAs of December 31, 2020, we own or have investments in nearly 9 million square feet spanning 40 operating properties and three in progress ground-up development properties, including a presence in the opportunity to provide flexible, contiguous/adjacent expansion to accommodate the growth of existing tenants.top two life sciences clusters, South San Francisco, California and Cambridge, Massachusetts.


Inpatient Rehabilitation and Long-termLong-Term Acute Care Facilities


We have 29 properties that are operated as LTACs. LTACs have a Medicare average length of stay of greater than 25 days and serve medically complex, chronically ill patients who require a high level of monitoring and specialized care, but whose conditions do not necessitate the continued services of an intensive care unit. The operators of these LTACs have the

capability to treat patients who suffer from multiple systemic failures or conditions such as neurological disorders, head injuries, brain stem and spinal cord trauma, cerebral vascular accidents, chemical brain injuries, central nervous system disorders, developmental anomalies and cardiopulmonary disorders. Chronic patients often depend on technology for continued life support, such as mechanical ventilators, total parenteral nutrition, respiration or cardiac monitors and dialysis machines, and, due to their severe medical conditions, generally are not clinically appropriate for admission to a nursing facility or rehabilitation hospital. All of our LTACs are freestanding facilities, and weWe do not own any “hospitals within hospitals.” We also own eight IRFs devoted to the rehabilitation of patients with various neurological, musculoskeletal, orthopedic and other medical conditions following stabilization of their acute medical issues.


Health Systems


We have 1213 properties that are operated as health systems. Health systems provide medical and surgical services, including inpatient care, intensive care, cardiac care, diagnostic services and emergency services. These health systems also provide outpatient services such as outpatient surgery, laboratory, radiology, respiratory therapy, cardiology and physical therapy. In the United States, these health systems receive payments for patient services from the federal government primarily
3


under the Medicare program, state governments under their respective Medicaid or similar programs, health maintenance organizations, preferred provider organizations, other private insurers and directly from patients.


Skilled Nursing Facilities


We have 1716 properties that are operated as SNFs. SNFs provide rehabilitative, restorative, skilled nursing and medical treatment for patients and residents who do not require the high technology, care-intensive, high costhigh-cost setting of an acute care or rehabilitation hospital. Treatment programs include physical, occupational, speech, respiratory and other therapies, including sub-acute clinical protocols such as wound care and intravenous drug treatment. Charges for these services are generally paid from a combination of government reimbursement and private sources.


Geographic Diversification of Properties


Our portfolio of seniors housing and healthcare propertiesassets is broadly diversified by geographic location throughout the United States, Canada and the United Kingdom, with properties in only one state (California) accounting for more than 10% of our total continuing revenues and net operating income (“NOI,” which is defined as total revenues, excluding interest and other income, less property-level operating expenses and office building services costs) for the year ended December 31, 2017.2020.


The following table shows our continuing rental income and resident fees and services by geographic location for the year ended December 31, 2017:
 
Rental Income and
Resident Fees and
Services
 
Percent of Total
Revenues
 (Dollars in thousands)
Geographic Location   
California$546,184
 15.3%
New York308,366
 8.6
Texas206,709
 5.8
Illinois170,846
 4.8
Florida158,889
 4.4
Pennsylvania148,882
 4.2
Connecticut114,040
 3.2
Georgia114,038
 3.2
North Carolina112,137
 3.1
Arizona104,684
 2.9
Other (36 states and the District of Columbia)1,239,588
 34.8
Total U.S3,224,363
 90.3%
Canada (7 provinces)186,049
 5.2
United Kingdom26,418
 0.7
Total(1)
$3,436,830
 96.2%

(1)The remainder of our total revenues is office building and other services revenue, income from loans and investments and interest and other income.
The following table shows our continuing NOI by geographic location for the year ended December 31, 2017:
 
NOI (1)
 
Percent of Total
NOI
 (Dollars in thousands)
Geographic Location   
California$288,435
 13.9%
Texas132,305
 6.4
New York119,123
 5.7
Illinois107,034
 5.1
Florida93,746
 4.5
Pennsylvania82,900
 4.0
Connecticut73,121
 3.5
North Carolina60,188
 2.9
Washington42,816
 2.1
Indiana43,992
 2.1
Other (36 states and the District of Columbia)801,854
 38.5
Total U.S1,845,514
 88.7%
Canada (7 provinces)92,112
 4.4
United Kingdom26,418
 1.3
Total (2)
$1,964,044
 94.4%

(1)See “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations—Non-GAAP Financial Measures—NOI” included in Item 7 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K for a reconciliation of NOI to its most directly comparable GAAP measure, income from continuing operations.
(2)The remainder of our total NOI is income from loans and investments.

See “NOTE 19—SEGMENT INFORMATION” of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements included in Part II, Item 8 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K for more information regarding the geographic diversification of our portfolio.


Loans and Investments


As of December 31, 2017,2020, we had $1.4$0.9 billion of net loans receivable and investments relating to seniorssenior housing and healthcare operators or properties. Our loans receivable and investments provide us with interest income, principal amortization and transaction fees and are typically secured by mortgage liens or leasehold mortgages on the underlying properties and corporate or personal guarantees by affiliates of the borrowing entity. In some cases, the loans are secured by a pledge of ownership interests in the entity or entities that own the related seniors housing or healthcare properties. From time to time, we also make investments in mezzanine loans, which are subordinated to senior secured loans held by other investors that encumber the same real estate. See “NOTE 6—LOANS RECEIVABLE AND INVESTMENTS”“Note 6 – Loans Receivable and Investments” of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements included in Part II, Item 8 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.Report.


Development and Redevelopment Projects


We are party to certain agreements that obligate us to develop seniors housing or healthcare properties funded through capital that we and, in certain circumstances, our joint venture partners provide. As of December 31, 2017,2020, we had 1413 properties under development pursuant to these agreements, including fourthree properties that are owned through unconsolidated real estate entities. In addition, from time to time, we engage in redevelopment projects with respect to our existing seniors housing communitiesproperties to maximize the value, increase NOI, maintain a market-competitive position, achieve property stabilization or change the primary use of the property.


Segment Information


We operate through three reportable business segments: triple-net leased properties, senior living operations and office operations. Non-segment assets, classified as “all other,” consist primarily of corporate assets, including cash, restricted cash, loans receivable and investments, and miscellaneous accounts receivable. Our chief operating decision makers evaluate performance of the combined properties in each reportable business segment and determine how to allocate resources to these segments, in significant part, based on segment NOI and related measures. For further information regarding our business segments and a discussion of our definition of segment NOI, see “NOTE 19—SEGMENT INFORMATION”“Note 19 – Segment Information” of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements included in Part II, Item 8 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.Report.

Significant Tenants, Operators and Managers

The following table summarizes certain information regarding our tenant, operator and manager concentration as of and for the year ended December 31, 2017 (excluding properties classified as held for sale as of December 31, 2017):
 
Number of
Properties Leased
or Managed
 
Percent of Total Real Estate Investments (1)
 Percent of Total Revenues Percent of NOI
Senior living operations (2)
293
 35.1% 51.9% 29.0%
Brookdale Senior Living (3)
129
 7.5
 4.9
 8.3
Ardent10
 4.9
 3.1
 5.4
Kindred (4)
32
 1.1
 4.3
 7.5

(1)Based on gross book value.
(2)Excludes four properties owned through investments in unconsolidated entities.
(3)Excludes six properties owned through investments in unconsolidated entities and one property managed by Brookdale Senior Living pursuant to a long-term management agreement and included in the senior living operations reportable business segment.
(4)Includes one MOB included in the office operations reportable business segment.


Triple-Net Leased Properties


Each ofIn our triple-net leased properties segment, we invest in and own senior housing and healthcare properties throughout the United States and the United Kingdom and lease those properties to healthcare operating companies under “triple-net” or “absolute-net” leases with Brookdale Senior Living, Ardent and Kindred is a triple-net lease that obligatesobligate the tenanttenants to pay all property-related expenses, including maintenance, utilities, repairs, taxes, insurance and capital expenditures, and to comply with the terms of the mortgage financing documents, if any, affecting the properties.

Senior Living Operations

In our senior living operations segment, we invest in senior housing communities throughout the United States and Canada and engage independent managers, such as Atria and Sunrise, to manage those communities. The REIT Investment
4


Diversification and Empowerment Act of 2007 (“RIDEA”) permits us to own or partially own qualified healthcare properties in a structure through which we can participate directly in the cash flow of the properties’ operations (as compared to receiving only contractual rent payments under a triple-net lease) in compliance with REIT requirements. In a RIDEA structure, we are required to rely on a third-party manager to manage and operate the property, including procuring supplies, hiring and training all employees, entering into all third-party contracts for the benefit of the property, including resident/patient agreements, complying with laws, including but not limited to healthcare laws, and providing resident care, in exchange for a management fee. As a result, we must rely on our managers’ personnel, expertise, technical resources and information systems, risk management processes, proprietary information, good faith and judgment to manage our senior living operations efficiently and effectively. We also rely on our managers to set appropriate resident fees, to provide accurate property-level financial results in a timely manner and otherwise operate our senior housing communities in compliance with the terms of our management agreements and all applicable laws and regulations.

Office Operations

In our office operations segment, we primarily acquire, own, develop, lease and manage MOBs and research and innovation centers throughout the United States.

Significant Tenants and Managers

The following table summarizes certain information regarding our tenant and manager concentration as of and for the year ended December 31, 2020 (excluding properties classified as held for sale and properties owned by investments in unconsolidated real estate entities as of December 31, 2020):
Number of
Properties Leased
or Managed
Percent of Total Real Estate Investments (1)
Percent of Total RevenuesPercent of NOI
Senior Living Operations432 47.9 %58.0 %29.4 %
Brookdale Senior Living (2)
121 8.2 4.4 9.0 
Ardent12 4.9 3.2 6.6 
Kindred32 1.1 3.5 7.1 
(1)Based on gross book value.
(2)Excludes eight properties managed by Brookdale Senior Living pursuant to long-term management agreements and included in the senior living operations reportable business segment.

Triple-Net Leased Properties

Each of our leases with Brookdale Senior Living, Ardent and Kindred is a triple-net lease. In addition, each of our Brookdale Senior Living, Ardent and Kindred leases has a corporate guaranty. Brookdale Senior Living has multiple leases with us and those leases contain cross-default provisions tied to each other, as well as lease renewals by lease agreement or by pool of assets.


The properties we lease to Brookdale Senior Living, Ardent and Kindred accounted for a significant portion of our triple-net leased properties segment revenues and NOI for the year ended December 31, 2017. If any of Brookdale Senior Living, Ardent or Kindred becomes unable or unwilling to satisfy its obligations to us or to renew its leases with us upon expiration of the terms thereof, our financial condition and results of operations could decline, and our ability to service our indebtedness and to make distributions to our stockholders could be impaired. We cannot assure you that Brookdale Senior Living, Ardent and Kindred will have sufficient assets, income and access to financing to enable them to satisfy their respective obligations to us, and any failure, inability or unwillingness by Brookdale Senior Living, Ardent or Kindred to do so could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations and liquidity, our ability to service our indebtedness and other obligations and our ability to make distributions to our stockholders, as required for us to continue to qualify as a REIT (a “Material Adverse Effect”). We also cannot assure you that Brookdale Senior Living, Ardent and Kindred will elect to renew their respective leases with us upon expiration of the leases or that we will be able to reposition any non-renewed properties on a timely basis or on the same or better economic terms, if at all.2020. See “Risk Factors—Risks Arising from Our Business—Our leasesBusiness Operations and other agreements with Brookdale Senior Living, Ardent and Kindred account for aStrategy Risks—A significant portion of our revenues and operating income; any failure, inability or unwillingness byincome is dependent on a limited number of tenants and managers, including Brookdale Senior Living, Ardent, or Kindred, to satisfy its obligations under our agreements could have a Material Adverse Effect on usAtria and Sunrise.” included in Part I, Item 1A of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.Report.


Brookdale Senior Living Leases


As of December 31, 2017,2020, we leased 129121 consolidated properties (excluding one propertyeight properties managed by Brookdale Senior Living pursuant to a long-term management agreementagreements and included in the senior living operations reportable business segment) to Brookdale Senior Living pursuantLiving.

In July 2020, we entered into a revised master lease agreement (the “Brookdale Lease”) and certain other agreements (together with the Brookdale Lease, the “Agreements”) with Brookdale Senior Living.

In connection with the revised Brookdale Lease, we received up-front consideration approximating $235 million, which will be amortized over the remaining lease term and consisted of: (a) $162 million in cash including $47 million from the transfer to multiple lease agreements.Ventas of deposits under the Brookdale Lease; (b) a $45 million cash pay note (the “Note”), which has an initial interest rate of 9.0%, increasing 50 basis points per annum, and matures on December 31, 2025; (c) warrants for 16.3 million

5


Pursuant to our lease agreements,shares of Brookdale Senior Living common stock, which are exercisable at any time prior to December 31, 2025 and have an exercise price of $3.00 per share.

Base cash rent under the Brookdale Lease is obligated to pay base rent, which escalates annuallyset at $100 million per annum starting in July 2020, with three percent annual escalators commencing on January 1, 2022. The Brookdale Lease is guaranteed by, and the Note is a specified rate over the prior period base rent. direct obligation of, Brookdale Senior Living.

The warrants are classified within other assets on our Consolidated Balance Sheets. These warrants are measured at fair value with changes in fair value being recognized within other expense in our Consolidated Statements of Income.

As of December 31, 2017,2020, the aggregate 20182021 contractual cash rent due to us from Brookdale Senior Living excluding variable interest that Brookdale Senior Living is obligated to pay as additional rent based on certain floating rate mortgage debt, was approximately $180.3$100.3 million, and the current aggregate contractual base rent (computed in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (“GAAP”)) due to us from Brookdale Senior Living, excluding the variable interest, was approximately $162.3 million (in each case, excluding six properties owned through investments in unconsolidated entities as of December 31, 2017). See “NOTE 3—CONCENTRATION OF CREDIT RISK” and “NOTE 14—COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES” of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements included in Part II, Item 8 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.$148.5 million.


Ardent Lease


As of December 31, 2017,2020, we leased 1011 properties (excluding one MOB leased to Ardent under a separate lease) to Ardent pursuant to a single, triple-net master lease agreement. Per our master lease agreement, Ardent is obligated to pay base rent, which escalates annually by the lesser of four times the increase in the consumer price indexConsumer Price Index (“CPI”) for the relevant period and 2.5%.  The initial term of the master lease expires on August 31, 2035 and Ardent has one ten-year renewal option.


As of December 31, 2017,2020, the aggregate 20182021 contractual cash rent due to us from Ardent was approximately $113.4$125.9 million, and the current aggregate contractual base rent (computed in accordance with GAAP) duewas approximately $126.0 million.

We also hold a 9.8% ownership interest in Ardent, which entitles us to us fromcustomary minority rights and protections, as well as the right to appoint one of 11 members on the Ardent was also approximately $113.4 million. Board of Directors.


Kindred Master Leases


As of December 31, 2017,2020, we leased 29 properties to Kindred pursuant to a master lease agreement. In November 2016, Kindred extended the lease term to 2025 for all of our LTACs operated by Kindred that were scheduled to mature in 2018 and 2020, at the current rent level.


The aggregate annual rent we receive under each Kindred master lease is referred to as “base rent.” Base rent escalates annually at a specified rate over the prior period base rent, contingent, in some cases, upon the satisfaction of specified facility revenue parameters. The annual rent escalator under the Kindred master lease for 25 properties is based on year-over-year changes in CPI, subject to a floor and cap, and is 2.7% for four properties. As of December 31, 2017,2020, the aggregate 20182021 contractual cash rent due to us from Kindred was approximately $122.0$130.4 million, and the current aggregate contractual base rent (computed in accordance with GAAP) due to us from Kindred was approximately $122.7$132.4 million. 


Senior Living Operations


As of December 31, 2017,2020, Atria and Sunrise, collectively, provided comprehensive property management and accounting services with respect to 269 consolidated seniors258 of the senior housing communities for which we payin our senior living operations segment. Under these management agreements, the operators receive annual base management fees pursuantranging from 4.5% to long-term7% of revenues generated by the applicable properties and, in some cases, additional management agreements. Mostfees based on the achievement of ourspecified performance targets. Our management agreements with Atria have initial terms expiring either July 31,between 2024 or December 31,and 2027, with successive automatic ten-year renewal periods. The management fees payable to Atria under most of the Atria management agreements range from 4.5% to 5% of revenues generated by the applicable properties, and Atria can earn up to an additional 1% of revenues based on the achievement of specified performance targets. Most of our management agreements with Sunrise have terms ranging from 25 to 30 years (which commenced as early as 2004expiring between 2030 and as recently as 2012). The base management fees payable to Sunrise on consolidated assets under the Sunrise2038. In some cases, our management agreements generally range from 5% to 7% of revenues generated by the applicable properties. See “NOTE 3—CONCENTRATION OF CREDIT RISK” of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements included in Part II, Item 8 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.include renewal provisions.


Because Atria and Sunrise manage our properties in exchange for the receipt of a management fee from us, we are not directly exposed to the credit risk of our managers in the same manner or to the same extent as our triple-net tenants. However, we rely on our managers’ personnel, expertise, technical resources and information systems, proprietary information, good faith and judgment to manage our senior living operations efficiently and effectively. We also rely on our managers to set appropriate resident fees and otherwise operate our seniors housing communities in compliance with the terms of our management agreements and all applicable laws and regulations. Although we have various rights as the property owner under our management agreements, including various rights to terminate and exercise remedies under those agreements as provided therein, Atria’s or Sunrise’s failure, inability or unwillingness to satisfy its respective obligations under those agreements, to efficiently and effectively manage our properties or to provide timely and accurate accounting information with respect thereto could have a Material Adverse Effect on us. In addition, significant changes in Atria’s or Sunrise’s senior management or equity ownership or any adverse developments in their businesses or financial condition could have a Material Adverse Effect on us. See “Risk Factors—Risks Arising from Our Business—The properties managed by AtriaBusiness Operations and Sunrise account for aStrategy Risk—A significant portion of our revenues and operating income; adverse developments in Atria’s or Sunrise’s businessincome is dependent on a limited number of tenants and affairs or financial condition could have a Material Adverse Effect on usmanagers, including Brookdale Senior Living, Ardent, Kindred, Atria and Sunrise.” and “—We have rights to terminate our management agreements with Atria and Sunriseincluded in whole or with respect to specific properties under certain circumstances, and we may be unable to replace Atria or Sunrise if our management agreements are terminated or not renewed” included inPart I, Item 1A of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.Report.


OurWe hold a 34% ownership interest in Atria, which entitles us to certaincustomary minority rights and minority protections, as well as the right to appoint two of the six members on the Atria Board of Directors.

6


Competition


We generally compete for investments in seniors housing and healthcare real estate assets with publicly traded, private and non-listed healthcare REITs, real estate partnerships, healthcare providers, healthcare lenders and other investors, including developers, banks, insurance companies, pension funds, government-sponsored entities and private equity firms, some of whom may have greater financial resources and lower costs of capital than we do. Increased competition challenges our ability to identify and successfully capitalize on opportunities that meet our objectives, which is affected by, among other factors, the availability of suitable acquisition or investment targets, our ability to negotiate acceptable transaction terms and our access to and cost of capital. See “Risk Factors—Risks Arising from Our Business—Business Operations and Strategy Risk—Our ongoing strategy depends, in part, upon future investments in and acquisitions of, or our development or redevelopment of, seniors housing and healthcare assets, and we may not be successful in identifying and consummating these transactionsfuture investments and effectively managing our expansion opportunities” included in Part I, Item 1A of this Annual Report on Form 10-K and “NOTE 10—SENIOR NOTES PAYABLE AND OTHER DEBT”“Note 10 – Senior Notes Payable and Other Debt” of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements included in Part II, Item 8 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.Report.


Our tenants operators and managers also compete on a local and regional basis with other healthcare operating companies that provide comparable services. SeniorsSenior housing community, SNF and health systems operators compete to attract and retain residents and patients to our properties based on scope and quality of care, reputation and financial condition, price, location and physical appearance of the properties, services offered, qualified personnel, physician referrals and family preferences. With respect to MOBs and research and innovation centers, we and our third-party managers compete to attract and retain tenants based on many of the same factors, in addition to quality of the affiliated health system, physician preferences and proximity to hospital campuses.or university campuses or life science centers and quality of lab space. The ability of our tenants, operators and managers to compete successfully could be affected by private, federal and state reimbursement programs and other laws and regulations. See “Risk Factors—Risks Arising from Our Business—OurLegal, Compliance and Regulatory Risks—We and our tenants, operatorsborrowers and managers may be adversely affected by healthcare regulation and enforcement” and “—Changes in the reimbursement rates or methods of payment from third-party payors, including insurance companies and the Medicare and

Medicaid programs, could have a material adverse effect on certain of our tenants and operators and on usenforcement.” included in Part I, Item 1A of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.Report.


EmployeesHuman Capital Management


At Ventas, our experienced team drives our success and creates value. As of December 31, 2017,2020, we had 493448 employees, none of which isare subject to a collective bargaining agreement.

We believeprovide a unique environment that relationsoffers opportunities for our team to use their professional skills, develop their talents and learn from each other as they build successful careers. We are committed to upholding human dignity and equal opportunity under the principles outlined in the United Nations’ Universal Declaration of Human Rights. Our Global Code of Ethics and Business Conduct, Vendor Code of Conduct and Human Rights Policy embed the responsibility to respect human rights in business functions across our operations as well as our supply chain.

The Executive Compensation Committee of our Board of Directors provides oversight on certain human capital matters, including our DE&I efforts, goals and framework. We report on human capital matters at each regularly scheduled meeting of our Board of Directors. The most significant human capital measures and objectives that we focus on include the topics described below.

Talent Attraction and Retention

We strive to foster a culture that attracts and retains individuals who share a passion for integrity, flawless execution, collaborative problem-solving and, above all, excellence. A key component of our ability to attract and retain the top talent in our industry is our investment in our people and their continuous development by providing expansive professional opportunities, best-in-class leadership development and a broad array of workshops and training. Ventas also prides itself in offering an industry-leading compensation and benefits package.

DE&I

Ventas has a long-standing commitment to Diversity, Equity and Inclusion (“DE&I”). We have established a DE&I framework centered around five key pillars of people, culture, investment and financial, changing our society and improving our communities and celebrating our commitments. Development and execution of the DE&I framework is a core component of our 2021 short-term incentive program. Additionally, we incorporated a metric focused on improving the Company’s representation of women employees into our 2020-2022 long-term equity incentive program, to further drive progress and accountability. As of December 31, 2020, our workforce is. As of December 31, 2020, our workforce is 52% male and 48% female, with our employeesBoard of Directors being 36% female.
7



Health & Safety

Ventas is committed to the health and safety of its employees. The responsibility is shared with each Ventas employee, helping to make our workplaces secure and hazard-free to protect against accidents, personal injury/illness and property damage. Our commitment to health and safety is maintained by effective administration, training and education, and we expect our operating and development partners to comply with applicable company or legal requirements, whichever is more stringent. In response to the COVID-19 pandemic, we seamlessly shifted to a remote work environment ahead of mandatory stay-at-home orders.

Sustainability

Ventas recognizes that sustainable practices and resilience are positive.essential to delivering superior long-term results. Our integrated approach to Environment, Social and Governance (“ESG”) principles animates our actions, decisions and processes. In 2018, we conducted an in-depth ESG prioritization (a “materiality assessment”) using the Global Reporting Initiative (GRI) framework, from which we organized the eight topics identified into three strategic pillars: People, Performance, and Planet. This approach integrates ESG principles throughout our business, ensures focus and reporting on key issues and motivates our daily efforts.


Ventas has an established cross-functional ESG Steering Committee, led by our Chairman and CEO and overseen by our Director of Sustainability, which provides oversight and monitoring of our ESG strategy, with reporting to our Board of Directors. Among other things, Ventas has set ambitious goals to reduce our greenhouse gas emissions, energy, water and waste, and to limit high flood risk properties in our portfolio.

For additional information regarding our ESG efforts, please visit our website at www.ventasreit.com
Insurance


We maintain or require in our lease, management and other agreements that our tenants, operators and managers or other counterparties maintain all applicable lines ofcomprehensive insurance coverage on our properties and their operations. Weoperations with terms, conditions, limits and deductibles that we believe that the amount and scope of insurance coverage provided by our policies and the policies required to be maintained by our tenants, operators and managers are customary for similarly situated companies in each industry and we frequently review our industry. Although we regularly monitor our tenants’, operators’insurance programs and managers’ compliance with their respectiverequirements. The insurance requirements, we cannot assure you that they will maintain the required insurance coverages, and any failure, inability or unwillingness by our tenants, operators and managers to do so could have a Material Adverse Effect on us. We also cannot assure you that we will continue tomaintain or require may take the same levelsform of commercial insurance, coverage under our lease, management and other agreements, that suchcaptive insurance coverage will be available at a reasonable cost in the future or that the policies maintained will fully cover all losses related to our properties upon the occurrence of a catastrophic event, nor can we assure you of the future financial viability of the insurers.self-insurance.


We maintain the property insurance for substantially all ofproperties in our office and senior living operations segment. We also maintain liability insurance for certain office properties, as well as the general and professional liability insurance for our seniorscertain senior housing communities and related operations managed by Atria.in our senior living operations segment. However, Sunrise maintainssome senior housing managers maintain the general and professional liability insurance for our seniorssenior housing communities and related operations that it managesthey manage in accordance with the terms of our management agreements. Under our management agreements with Sunrise, we may elect, on an annual basis, whether we or Sunrise will bear responsibility for maintaining the required insurance coverage for the applicable properties, but the costs of such insurance are facility expenses paid from the revenues of those properties, regardless of who maintains the insurance.


Through our office operations, we provide engineering, construction and architectural services in connection with new development projects, and anywe maintain and cause tenants, contractors, design construction or systems failures relatedprofessionals and other parties involved with such services to the properties we develop could result in substantial injury or damage to our clients or third parties. Any such injury or damage claims may arise in the ordinary coursemaintain property and may be assertedliability insurance with respect to ongoing or completed projects. Although we maintain liabilitythose activities.

In May 2020, the Company formed a wholly owned captive insurance to protect us against these claims, if any claim results in a loss, we cannot assure you that our policy limits would be adequate to cover the loss in full. If we sustain losses in excess of ourcompany, which provides insurance coverage we may be required to payfor losses below the differencedeductible and we could lose our investment in, or experience reduced profits and cash flows from,within the affected MOB or life science and innovation center, which could have a Material Adverse Effect on us.

For various reasons, including to reduce and manage costs, many healthcare companies utilize different organizational and corporate structures coupled with self-insurance trusts or captive programs that may provide less coverage than a traditional insurance policy. As a result, companies that self-insure could incur large funded and unfundedself-insured retention of the commercial property, general and professional liability expenses, which could have a material adverse effect on their liquidity, financial condition and results of operations. The implementation of a trust or captive by anyinsurance that we maintain for certain of our tenants, operators or managers could adversely affect such person’s ability to satisfy its obligations under, or otherwise comply with the termsOffice and senior living operations locations. The Company created this captive as part of its respective lease,overall risk management program and other agreements with us, which could have a Material Adverse Effect on us. Likewise, if we decide to implement a captive or self-insurance program, any large funded and unfunded general and professional liability expenses that we incur could have a Material Adverse Effect on us.stabilize insurance costs.


Additional Information


We maintain a website at www.ventasreit.com. The information on our website is not incorporated by reference in this Annual Report, on Form 10-K, and our web address is included as an inactive textual reference only.


We make available, free of charge, through our website our Annual Report, on Form 10-K, Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q, Current Reports on Form 8-K and amendments to those reports filed or furnished pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Exchange Act as soon as reasonably practicable after we electronically file such material with, or furnish it to, the SEC. In addition, our Guidelines on Governance, our Global Code of Ethics and Business Conduct (including waivers from and amendments to that
8


document) and the charters for each of our Audit and Compliance, Nominating and Corporate Governance and Executive Compensation Committees are available on our website, and we will mail copies of the foregoing documents to

stockholders, free of charge, upon request to our Corporate Secretary at Ventas, Inc., 353 North Clark Street, Suite 3300, Chicago, Illinois 60654.


GOVERNMENTALGOVERNMENT REGULATION


Governmental Response to the COVID-19 Pandemic

In response to the COVID-19 pandemic, in 2020, Congress enacted a series of economic stimulus and relief measures through the Coronavirus Aid, Relief and Economic Security Act (the “CARES Act”), the Paycheck Protection Program and Health Care Enhancement Act (the “PPPHCE Act”) and the Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2021 (“CAA”). In total, the CARES Act, the PPPHCE Act and the CAA authorize approximately $175 billion to be distributed to healthcare providers through the Public Health and Social Services Emergency Fund (“Provider Relief Fund”), which is administered by the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services (“HHS”). These grants are intended to reimburse eligible providers for expenses incurred to prevent, prepare for and respond to COVID-19 and lost revenues attributable to COVID-19. Recipients are not required to repay distributions from the Provider Relief Fund, provided that they attest to and comply with certain terms and conditions, including, not using grants received from the Provider Relief Fund to reimburse expenses or losses that other sources are obligated to reimburse, reporting and record keeping requirements and cooperating with any government audits.

HHS began distributing Provider Relief Fund grants in April 2020 and has made grants available to various provider groups in phases. We applied for and received grants under Phase 2 and Phase 3 of the Provider Relief Fund on behalf of the assisted living communities in our senior living operations segment and may apply for additional grants in the future. Many of our senior housing, hospital, health system, medical office and other tenants also received grants from the Provider Relief Fund. HHS continues to evaluate and provide allocations of, and issue regulations and guidance regarding, grants made under the CARES Act and related legislation. We continue to monitor and evaluate the terms and conditions associated with payments received under the Provider Relief Fund.

The CARES Act and related legislation also make other forms of financial assistance available to healthcare providers, which has benefited our tenants and our senior living operations segment to varying degrees. This assistance includes Medicare and Medicaid payment adjustments and an expansion of the Medicare Accelerated and Advance Payment Program, which made available accelerated payments of Medicare funds in order to increase cash flow to providers. These payments are loans that providers must repay. Effective October 2020, the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (“CMS”) is no longer accepting applications for accelerated or advance payments. The Cares Act and related legislation also suspended Medicare sequestration payment adjustments, which would have otherwise reduced payments to Medicare providers by 2%, from May 1, 2020 through March 31, 2021, but also extended sequestration through 2030. These laws also include provisions intended to expand coverage of COVID-19 testing and preventive services, address healthcare workforce needs and ease other legal and regulatory burdens on healthcare providers. Due to the recent enactment of the CARES Act, the PPPHCE Act, and the CAA, there is a high degree of uncertainty surrounding their implementation, and the public health emergency continues to evolve. See “Risk Factors—COVID-19 Risks—There is a high degree of uncertainty regarding the implementation and impact of the CARES Act and other pandemic-related legislation and any future COVID-19 relief measures. There can be no assurance as to the total amount of financial assistance we or our tenants or borrowers will receive or that we will be able to benefit from provisions intended to increase access to resources and ease regulatory burdens for healthcare providers.” included in Part I, Item 1A of this Annual Report.

Federal, state and local governments and agencies have implemented or announced other programs to provide financial and other support to businesses affected by the COVID-19 pandemic, some of which have benefited our tenants, borrowers, managers and our senior living operations segment, but that impose significant regulatory and compliance obligations.

United States Healthcare Regulation, Licensing and Enforcement


Overview


OurWe, along with our tenants, operatorsborrowers, and managers in the United States, are typically subject to or impacted by extensive and complex federal, state and local healthcare laws and regulations, including laws and regulations relating to quality of care, licensure and certificatecertificates of need (“CON”), conduct of operations, government reimbursement, such as Medicare and Medicaid, fraud and abuse, practices, qualifications of personnel, appropriateness and classification of care, adequacy of plant and equipment, and otherdata security and privacy. Although the effects of these laws and regulations governingon our business are typically indirect, some of these laws and regulations apply directly to us and the operation ofsenior housing communities in our senior living operations segment,
9


where we generally hold the applicable healthcare facilities.licenses and enroll in applicable reimbursement programs. Healthcare is a highly regulated industrylaws and that trend will, in general, continue in the future. The applicable rulesregulations are wide-ranging, and can subject our tenants, operators and managers tononcompliance may result in the imposition of civil, criminal, and administrative sanctions,penalties, including: the possible loss or suspension of accreditation, licenses or license;CONs; suspension of or non-payment for new admissions; denial of reimbursement; imposition of fines; suspension, decertification, or exclusion from federal and state healthcare programs; or facility closure. Changes in laws or regulations, reimbursement policies, enforcement activity and regulatory non-compliance by us or our tenants, operators andborrowers or managers can allcould have a significant effect on our and their operations and financial condition, which in turn may adversely impact us, as detailed below and set forth under “Risk Factors” in Part I, Item 1A of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.Report.

In 2017, Congress came within a single vote of repealing of the Affordable Care Act (the “ACA”) and substantially reducing funding to the Medicaid program. Short of full repeal, new legislation is likely to be introduced to seek similar changes in 2018. Beyond this, significant changes to commercial health insurance and government sponsored insurance (i.e. Medicare and Medicaid) remain possible. Commercial and government payors, are likely to continue imposing greater discounts and more stringent cost controls upon operators, through changes in reimbursement rates and methodologies, discounted fee structures, the assumption by healthcare providers of all or a portion of the financial risk or otherwise. A shift toward less comprehensive health insurance coverage and increased consumer cost-sharing on health expenditures could have a material adverse effect on certain of our operators’ liquidity, financial condition and results of operations and, in turn, their ability to satisfy their contractual obligations, including making rental payments under and otherwise complying with the terms of our leases.


Licensure, Certification and CONs


In general, the operatorsRegulation of our inpatientsenior housing communities consists primarily of state and local laws that may require licenses, certifications and permits, and may vary greatly from one jurisdiction to another.Our senior housing communities that receive Medicaid payments are also subject to extensive federal laws and regulation.Inpatient rehabilitation and long-term acute care facilities, health systems, and skilled nursing facilities, (collectively “healthcare facilities”)which we do not directly operate, are typically subject to extensive federal and state regulation and must be licensedhold various licenses, certifications, and periodically certified through various regulatory agencies that determine compliance with federal, state and local laws to participate in the Medicare and Medicaid programs. Legal requirements pertaining to such licensurepermits.Licensure and certification relatemay be conditioned on requirements related to, among other things, the quality of medical care provided by thean operator, qualifications of the operator’s administrative personnel and clinical staff, adequacy of the physical plant and equipment and continuing compliance with applicable laws and regulations. AFederal and state government agencies have issued additional requirements in connection with the COVID-19 pandemic.For example, CMS is requiring testing of skilled nursing facility staff and residents for COVID-19 and reporting of COVID-19 data to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (“CDC”).

Sanctions for failure to comply with licensure and certification laws and regulations include loss of licensure or certification could adversely affect a healthcare facility operator’sand ability to participate in or receive payments from the Medicare and Medicaid programs, which, in turn,suspension of or non-payment for new admissions, fines, and potential criminal penalties.Even if we are not the operator of a facility, imposition of such sanctions could adversely affect itsthe healthcare facility operator’s ability to satisfy its obligations to us.Further, if we have to replace a tenant, we may experience difficulties in finding a replacement and effectively and efficiently transitioning the property to a new tenant.See “Risk Factors—Our Business Operations and Strategy Risks—If we need to replace any of our tenants or managers, we may be unable to do so on as favorable terms, or at all, and we could be subject to delays, limitations and expenses, which could adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.” included in Part I, Item 1A of this Annual Report.


In addition, many of our healthcarelicensed facilities and tenants are subject to state certificate of need (“CON”)CON laws, thatwhich require governmental approval prior to the development or expansion of healthcarelicensed facilities and services.The approval process in these states with CON laws generally requires a facility to demonstrate the need for additional or expanded healthcarelicensed facilities or services.CONs, where applicable, are also sometimes necessary for changes in ownership or control of licensed facilities, addition of beds, investment in major capital equipment, introduction of new services or termination of services previously approved through the CON process.CON laws and regulations may restrict an operator’sour or our tenants’ ability to expand our properties and grow its business in certain circumstances, which could have an adverse effect on the operator’s revenues and, in turn, its ability to make rental payments under and otherwise comply with the terms of our leases. See “Risk Factors-Risks Arising from Our Business-If we must replace any of our tenants or operators, we might be unable to reposition the properties on as favorable terms, or at all, and we could be subject to delays, limitations and expenses, which could have a Material Adverse Effect on us” included in Part I, Item 1A of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.their revenues.

State CON laws remained largely unchanged in 2017, with the exception of North Carolina. North Carolina’s CON statute, underwent minor changes in 2017 by exempting from CON review new institutional health services involving the acquisition of an unlicensed adult care home that was previously licensed.


    Compared to healthcare facilities, seniors housing communities (other than those that receive Medicaid payments) do not receive significant funding from governmental healthcare programs and are subject to relatively few, if any, federal regulations. Instead, to the extent they are regulated, such regulation consists primarily of state and local laws governing licensure, provision of services, staffing requirements and other operational matters, which vary greatly from one jurisdiction to another. Although recent growth in the U.S. seniors housing industry has attracted the attention of various federal agencies that believe more federal regulation of these properties is necessary, Congress thus far has deferred to state regulation of seniors housing communities. However, as a result of this growth and increased federal scrutiny, some states have revised and strengthened their regulation of seniors housing communities, and more states are expected to do the same in the future.

As discussed in greater detail below, a number of states have instituted Medicaid waiver programs that blend the functions of healthcare and custodial care providers, and expand the scope of services that can be provided under certain licenses. The trend toward this kind of experimentation is likely to continue, and even hasten, under Republican leadership. The temporary and experimental nature of these programs means that states will also continue to adjust their licensing and certification processes which might result in some providers facing increased competition and others facing new requirements.


Fraud and Abuse Enforcement


Healthcare facilities and seniors housing communities that receive Medicaid paymentsParticipants in the U.S. healthcare industry are subject to various complex federal and state civil and localcriminal laws and regulations that governgoverning healthcare providers'provider referrals, relationships and arrangements and prohibit fraudulent and abusive business practices. arrangements.These laws and regulations include, among others:

Federalinclude: (i) federal and state false claims acts, which among other things,generally prohibit healthcare providers from filing false claims or making false statements to receive payment from Medicare, Medicaid or other governmentalfederal or state healthcare programs;

Federal (ii) federal and state anti-kickback and fee-splitting statutes, including the Medicare and Medicaid anti-kickback statute,federal Anti-Kickback Statute, which prohibitprohibits the payment or receipt or solicitation of any remuneration to induce referrals of patients foror generate business involving healthcare items or services coveredpayable by a governmental healthcare program, including Medicare andor Medicaid;

Federal (iii) federal and state physician self-referral laws, including the federal Stark Law, which generally prohibits physicians from referring patients enrolled in certain governmental healthcare programs to providersprohibit referrals of certain designated health services inby physicians to entities with which the referring physician or an immediate family member ofhas a financial relationship; and (iv) the referring physician has an ownership or other financial interest;

The federal Civil Monetary Penalties Law, which authorizesrequires a lower burden of proof than other fraud and abuse laws and prohibits, among other things, the U.S. Departmentknowing presentation of Health and Human Services (“HHS”) to impose civil penalties administrativelya false or fraudulent claim for fraudulent acts; andcertain healthcare services.


State and federal data privacy and security laws, including the privacy and security rules of the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996, which provide for the privacy and security of certain individually identifiable health information.

Violating these healthcare fraud and abuse laws and regulations may result in criminal and civil penalties, such as punitive sanctions, damage assessments, monetary penalties, imprisonment, denial of Medicare and Medicaid payments, and exclusion from the Medicare and Medicaid programs. The responsibility for enforcing theseThese laws and regulations lies withare enforced by a variety orof federal, state and
10


local governmental agencies, howeverand many of the laws and regulations can also be enforced by private litigants through federal and state false claims acts and other laws that allow private individuals to bring whistleblower suits known as qui tamactions.


Reimbursement

Sources of revenue for us and some of our tenants include, among others, governmental healthcare programs, such as the federal Medicare programs and state Medicaid programs, and non-governmental third-party payors, such as insurance carriers and health maintenance organizations.Medicare is a federal health insurance program for persons age 65 and over, some disabled persons and persons with end-stage renal disease.Medicaid is a medical assistance program for eligible needy persons that is funded jointly by federal and state governments and administered by the states.Medicaid eligibility requirements and benefits vary by state.The Medicare and Medicaid programs are highly regulated and subject to frequent and substantial changes resulting from legislation, regulations and administrative and judicial interpretations of existing law.

As federal and state governments face significant budgetary pressures, they continue efforts to reduce Medicare and Medicaid spending through methods such as reductions in reimbursement rates and increased enrollment in managed care programs.Private payors are typically for-profit companies and are continuously seeking opportunities to control healthcare costs.In some cases, private payors rely on government reimbursement systems to determine reimbursement rates, such that reductions in Medicare and Medicaid payment rates may negatively impact payments from private payors.These changes may result in reduced or slower growth in reimbursement for certain services provided by some of our tenants and managers.Additionally, the U.S. Congress has significantly increased fundingand certain state legislatures have introduced and passed a large number of proposals and legislation designed to the governmental agencies charged with enforcingmake major changes in the healthcare fraudsystem, including changes that directly or indirectly affect reimbursement.Several of these laws, including the Patient Protection and abuse laws to facilitate increased audits, investigations and prosecutions of providers suspected of healthcare fraud. As a result, government investigations and enforcement actions brought against healthcare providers have increased significantly in recent years and are expected to continue. A violation of federal or state anti-fraud and abuse laws or regulationsAffordable Care Act, as amended by an operator of our properties could have a material adverse effect on the operator’s liquidity, financial condition or results of operations, which could adversely affect its ability to satisfy its contractual obligations, including making rental payments under and otherwise complying with the terms of our leases.

The current presidential administration has signaled it will expand current efforts to enforce healthcare fraud and abuse laws by increasing funding for the Health Care Fraud and Abuse Control program. Additionally, Attorney General Jeff Sessions has stated that he will make it a high priority to prosecute fraud in federal claims while the administratorEducation Reconciliation Act of the Centers for

Medicare and Medicaid Services (“CMS”2010 (the “Affordable Care Act”), Seema Verma, has underscored this administration’s focus on healthcare fraud, stating that she will ensure that efforts preventing fraud and abuse are a priority. Further, many state Medicaid programs continue to devote additional resources to fraud, waste, and abuse initiatives. Medicaid reform plans might include lowering the growth rate of Medicaid spending, which will put pressure on states to exert greater scrutiny over the utilization of services. It is likely that states will have increased flexibility and incentive to monitor utilization patterns and take action against outlier providers.

Medicare’s fraud, waste, and abuse initiatives are also being retooled by the current presidential administration. Because a backlog of provider appeals in response to Medicare audits, CMS finalized significant changes intended to expedite the Medicare appeals process in 2017, particularly at the administrative law judge level of review.  These changes apply to appeals of payment and coverage determinations for items and services furnished to Medicare beneficiaries, enrollees in Medicare Advantage and other Medicare competitive health plans, and enrollees in Medicare prescription drug plans, as well as to appeals of enrollment and entitlement determinations, and certain premium appeals. The Recovery Audit Contractor program, which has recovered more than $2 billion for the Medicare program, also continues to be controversial and may be modified under the new administration.

Reimbursement

The majority of SNF reimbursement, and a significant percentage of health system, IRF and LTAC reimbursement, is through Medicare and Medicaid. Medical buildings and other healthcare related properties have provider tenants that participate in Medicare and Medicaid. These programs are often their largest source of funding. Seniors housing communities generally do not receive fundingpromoted shifting from Medicare or Medicaid, but their ability to retain their residents is impacted by policy decisions and initiatives established by the administrators of Medicare and Medicaid. The passage of the ACA in 2010 allowed formerly uninsured Americans to acquire coverage and utilize additional health care services. In addition, the ACA gave new authorities to implement Medicaid waiver and pilot programs that impact healthcare and long term custodial care reimbursement by Medicare and Medicaid. These activities promote “aging in place”, allowing senior citizens to stay longer in seniors housing communities, and diverting or delaying their admission into SNFs. The potential risks that accompany these regulatory and market changes are discussed below.

As a result of the ACA, and specifically Medicaid expansion and establishment of health insurance exchanges providing subsidized health insurance, an estimated seventeen million more Americans have health insurance than in 2010. These newly-insured Americans utilize services delivered by providers at medical buildings and other healthcare facilities. The current presidential administration and Republican-controlled Congress nearly repealed the ACA in 2017 and remain committed to repealing the ACA and replacing it with a less federalized model for providing health insurance to individuals and families unable to purchase health insurance on their own. The details of the replacement model are not yet known, but potential end results could be fewer insured individuals and families or individuals and families maintaining less comprehensive insurance coverage. Outside of ACA repeal, Republicans leaders, particularly in the House of Representatives, are committed to pursuing entitlement reforms in 2018 that could lower funding to major federal programs, particularly Medicaid and lessen the number of people covered by these programs. Even without legislation, the current presidential administration has issued regulations that may lessen the number of people who purchase ACA-compliant health insurance, which has the potential to provide less protection to people coping with expensive health conditions. Any of these outcomes could adversely impact the resources of our operators.

Enabled by the Medicare Modernization Act (2003) and subsequent laws, Medicare and Medicaid have implemented pilot programs (officially termed demonstrations or models) to “divert” elderly from SNFs and promote “aging in place” in “the least restrictive environment.” Several states have implemented home and community-based Medicaid waiver programs that increase the support services available to senior citizens in senior housing, lengthening the time that many seniors can live outside of a SNF. These Medicaid waiver programs are subject to re-approval and pilots are time-limited. The current presidential administration is not necessarily opposed to these efforts, but is committed to giving states greater control of their Medicaid programs. The result could be the modification or curtailment of a number of existing pilots.

CMS is currently in the midst of transitioning Medicare from a traditional fee-for-service reimbursement modelmodels to capitatedalternative payment models that tie reimbursement to quality and value-based approaches in which the government pays a set amount for each beneficiary for a defined periodcost of time, based on that person’s underlying medical needs, rather than the actual services provided. The result is increasing use of management tools to oversee individual providers and coordinate their services. This puts downward pressure on the number and expense of services provided. Roughly 10 million Medicare beneficiaries now receive care, viasuch as accountable care organizations and another 19 million are enrolled in Medicare

Advantage health plans. The continued trend toward capitatedbundled payments.It is difficult to predict the nature and value-based approaches - particularly Medicare Advantage, which is expectedsuccess of future financial or delivery system reforms, but changes to grow under the current presidential administration - has the potential to diminish the market for certain healthcare providers, particularly specialist physiciansreimbursement rates and providers of particular diagnostic technologies such as medical resonance imaging services. Thisrelated policies could adversely impact the medical properties that house these physiciansour and medical technology providers.our tenants’ results of operations.


The majority of Medicare payments continue to be made through traditional Medicare Part A and Part B fee-for-service schedules. Medicare’s payment regulations, particularly with respect to certain hospitals, skilled nursing care, and home health services have resulted in lower net pay increases than providers of those services often desire. In addition, the Medicare and CHIP Reauthorization Act (MACRA) of 2015 establishes a multi-year transition into pay-for-quality approaches for Medicare physicians and other providers. This will include payment reductions for providers who do not meet government quality standards. The implementation of pay-for-quality models is expected to produce funding disparities that could adversely impact some provider tenants in MOBs and other health care properties. The current presidential administration has made public comments about protecting Medicare generally and improving Medicare and MACRA for healthcare providers, but few specifics are known at this time. A negative payment update in 2017 for home health reimbursement demonstrates that the current presidential administration, regardless of public statements, may take actions adverse to certain provider types.

For the year ended December 31, 2017,2020, approximately 8.4%7.2% of our total revenues and 14.5%15.0% of our total NOI (in each case excluding amounts in discontinued operations) were attributable to acute and post-acute healthcare facilities in which our third-party tenants receive reimbursement for their services under governmental healthcare programs, such as Medicare and Medicaid.We are neither a participant in, nor a direct recipient of, any reimbursement under these programs with respect to those leased facilities.


Data Privacy and Security

Privacy and security regulations issued pursuant to the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996, as amended ( “HIPAA”), restrict the use and disclosure of individually identifiable health information (“protected health information” or “PHI”), provide for individual rights, and require safeguards for PHI and notification of breaches of unsecure PHI. Entities subject to HIPAA include most healthcare providers, including some of our tenants and borrowers. These covered entities are required to implement administrative, physical and technical practices to protect the security of individually identifiable health information that is electronically maintained or transmitted. Business associates of covered entities who create, receive, maintain or transmit PHI are also subject to certain HIPAA provisions. Violations of HIPAA may result in substantial civil and/or criminal fines and penalties.

There are several other laws and legislative and regulatory initiatives at the federal and state levels addressing privacy and security of personal information. For example, the Federal Trade Commission uses its consumer protection authority to initiate enforcement actions in response to data breaches. In most cases, we depend on our tenants and managers to fulfill any compliance obligations with respect to HIPAA and other privacy and security laws and regulations.

International Healthcare Regulation

We own senior housing communities in Canada and the United Kingdom. Senior living residences in Canada are provincially regulated. Within each province, there are different categories for senior living residences that are generally based on the level of care sought or required by a resident (e.g., assisted or retirement living, senior living residences, residential care, long-term care). In some of these categories and depending on the province, residences may be government funded, or the individual residents may be eligible for a government subsidy, while other residences are exclusively private-pay. The
11


governing legislation and regulations vary by province, but generally impose licensing requirements and minimum standards of care for senior living residences. These laws empower regulators in each province to take a variety of steps to ensure compliance, conduct inspections, issue reports and generally regulate the industry. Our communities in Canada are also subject to privacy legislation, including, in certain provinces, privacy laws specifically related to personal health information. Although the obligations of senior living residences in the various provinces differ, they all include the obligation to protect personal information. The powers of privacy regulators and penalties for violations of privacy law vary according to the applicable law or are left to the courts. Our senior living residences in Canada are also subject to a variety of other laws and regulations, including minimum wage standards and other employment laws.

In the United Kingdom, our senior housing communities are principally regulated as “care home services” under the Health and Social Care Act 2008. This legislation subjects service providers to standards of care and requires, among other things, that all persons carrying out such activities, and the managers of such persons, be registered. Providers of care home services are also subject (as data controllers) to laws and regulations governing their use of personal data (including in relation to their employees, clients and recipients of their services). These laws take the form of the U.K.’s Data Protection Act 2018. The Data Protection Act imposes a significant number of obligations on controllers with the potential for fines of up to 4% of annual worldwide turnover or €20 million, whichever is greater. Our business operations in the United Kingdom are also subject to a range of other regulations, such as the U.K. Bribery Act 2010, minimum wage standards and other employment laws.

The United Kingdom exited from the EU on January 31, 2020. The impact of Brexit on the healthcare industry will depend on a variety of factors, including the evolution of healthcare regulatory and immigration policy and the broader economic outlook in the United Kingdom.

Regulation Impacting Life Science, Research and Innovation Centers


In 2016, we enteredWe lease a number of our assets to tenants in the life science, research and innovation (“life science”)sector. These tenants consist of university-affiliated organizations and other private sector through the acquisitions of substantially all of the university affiliated life science real estate assets of Wexford Science & Technology, LLC from affiliates of Blackstone Real Estate Partners VIII, L.P. The life sciencecompanies. These tenants of these assets are largely university-affiliated organizations. These university-affiliated life science tenants aremay be dependent on private investors, the federal government or other sources of funding to varying degrees.support their activities. Creating a new pharmaceutical product or medical device requires substantial investments of time and capital, in part because of the extensive regulation of the healthcare industry; it also entails considerable risk of failure in demonstrating that the product is safe and effective and in gaining regulatory approval and market acceptance. Therefore, our tenants in the life science, research and innovation industry face high levels of regulation, expense and uncertainty. See “Risk Factors—Environmental, Economic and Market Risks—Our life science, R&I tenants face unique levels of regulation, expense and uncertainty.” included in Part I, Item 1A of this Annual Report.


Some of our life sciences tenants require significant outlays of funds for the research, development and clinical testing of their products and technologies. If private investors, the federal government or other sources of funding are unavailable to support such activities, a tenant’s life sciences operation may be adversely affected or fail. Further, the research, development, clinical testing, manufacture and marketing of some of our tenants’ products requires federal, state and foreign regulatory approvals which may be costly or difficult to obtain. Even after a life sciences tenant gains regulatory approval and market acceptance for a product, the product may still present significant regulatory and liability risks, including, among others, the possible later discovery of safety concerns, competition from new products and the expiration of patent protection for the product. Our tenants with marketable products may be adversely affected by healthcare reform and government reimbursement policies, including changes under the current presidential administration or by private healthcare payors. Likewise,

Tax Regulation

We elected to be taxed as a REIT under Sections 856 through 860 of the Internal Revenue Code (the “Code”), commencing with our tenants maytaxable year ended December 31, 1999. Provided we qualify for taxation as a REIT, we generally will not be unablerequired to adequately protect their intellectual propertypay U.S. federal corporate income taxes on our REIT taxable income that is currently distributed to our stockholders. This treatment substantially eliminates the “double taxation” that ordinarily results from investment in a C corporation. We will, however, be required to pay U.S. federal income tax in certain circumstances.

The Code defines a REIT as a corporation, trust or association:

(1) that is managed by one or more trustees or directors;

(2) that issues transferable shares or transferable certificates to evidence its beneficial ownership;

(3) that would be taxable as a domestic corporation, but for Sections 856 through 860 of the Code;

(4) that is not a financial institution or an insurance company within the meaning of certain provisions of the Code;

(5) that is beneficially owned by 100 or more persons;

12


(6) not more than 50% in value of the outstanding stock of which is owned, actually or constructively, by five or fewer individuals, including certain specified entities, during the last half of each taxable year; and

(7) that meets other tests, regarding the nature of its income and assets and the amount of its distributions.

We believe that we have been organized and have operated in a manner that has allowed us, and will continue to allow us, to satisfy conditions (1) through (7) inclusive, during the relevant time periods, and we intend to continue to be organized and operate in this manner. However, qualification and taxation as a REIT depend upon our ability to meet the various qualification tests imposed under patent, copyrightthe Code, including through actual operating results, asset composition, distribution levels and diversity of stock ownership. Accordingly, no assurance can be given that we will be organized or trade secret laws. will be able to operate in a manner so as to qualify or remain qualified as a REIT.

If we lose our life sciences tenants’ businessesstatus as a REIT (currently or with respect to any tax years for which the statute of limitations has not expired), we will face serious tax consequences that will substantially reduce the funds available to satisfy our obligations, to implement our business strategy and to make distributions to our stockholders for each of the years involved because:

We would not be allowed a deduction for distributions to stockholders in computing our taxable income and would be subject to regular U.S. federal corporate income tax;

We could be subject to increased state and local taxes; and

Unless we are adversely affected, they may have difficulty making paymentsentitled to us,relief under statutory provisions, we could not elect to be subject to tax as a REIT for four taxable years following the year during which we were disqualified.

In addition, in such event we would no longer be required to pay dividends to maintain REIT status, which could materially adversely affect the value of our business, results of operations and financial condition.common stock. See “Risk Factors—Our REIT Status Risks”.


Environmental Regulation


AsA wide variety of federal, state and local environmental and occupational health and safety laws and regulations affect our assets. We are committed to not only meeting these requirements of these laws and regulations, but exceeding them through our Environmental, Social and Governance activities.See “—Sustainability.”

However, these complex federal and state statutes, and their enforcement, involve a myriad of regulations, many of which involve strict liability on the part of the potential offender. Some of these federal and state statutes may directly impact us. Under various federal, state and local environmental laws, ordinances and regulations, an owner of real property we are subject to various federal, state and local laws and regulations regarding environmental, health and safety matters.

These laws and regulations address, among other things, asbestos, polychlorinated biphenyls, fuel oil management, wastewater discharges, air emissions, radioactive materials, medical wastes, and hazardous wastes, and, in certain cases,or a secured lender, such as us, may be liable for the costs of complyingremoval or remediation of hazardous or toxic substances at, under or disposed of in connection with these lawssuch property, as well as other potential costs relating to hazardous or toxic substances (including government fines and regulationsdamages for injuries to persons and the penalties for non-compliance can be substantial. adjacent property).
With respect to our properties that are operated or managed by third parties, we may be held primarily or jointly and severally liable for costs relating to the investigation and clean-upcleanup of any property from which there is or has been an actual or threatened release of a regulated material and any other affected properties, regardless of whether we knew of or caused the release. Such costs typically are not limited by law or regulation and could exceed the property’s value. In addition, we may be liable for certain

other costs, such as governmental fines and injuries to persons, property or natural resources, as a result of any such actual or threatened release. See “Risk Factors-Risks Arising from Factors—Our Business-We could incur substantialBusiness Operations and Strategy Risks—Our operating assets may expose us to various operational risks, liabilities and claims that could adversely affect our ability to generate revenues or increase our costs if anyand could adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of our properties are found to be contaminated with hazardous substances or we become involved in any environmental disputesoperations.” included in Part I, Item 1A of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.Report.


Under the terms of our lease, management and other agreements, we generally have a right to indemnification by the tenants operators and managers of our properties for any contamination caused by them. However, we cannot assure you that our tenants, operators and managers will have the financial capability or willingness to satisfy their respective indemnification obligations to us, and any failure, inability or unwillingness to do so may require us to satisfy the underlying environmental claims.


In general, we have also agreed to indemnify our tenants and operatorsmanagers against any environmental claims (including penalties and clean-upcleanup costs) resulting from any condition arising in, on or under, or relating to, the leased properties at any time before the applicable lease commencement date. With respect to our senior living operating portfolio, we have agreed to indemnify our managers against any environmental claims (including penalties and clean- upcleanup costs) resulting from any condition on those properties, unless the manager caused or contributed to that condition.

13


We did not make any material capital expenditures in connection with environmental, health, and safety laws, ordinances and regulations in 2017 and do not expect that we will be required to make any such material capital expenditures during 2018.

Canada

In Canada, seniors housing communities are currently generally subject to significantly less regulation than skilled nursing facilities and hospitals, and the regulation of such facilities is principally a matter of provincial and municipal jurisdiction. As a result, the regulatory regimes that apply to seniors housing communities vary depending on the province (and in certain circumstances, the city) in which a facility is located. Recently, certain Canadian provinces have taken steps to implement regulatory measures that could result in enhanced regulation for seniors housing communities in such provinces.

ITEM 1A.    Risk Factors

This section discusses the most significantmaterial factors that affect our business, operations and financial condition. It does not describe all risks and uncertainties applicable to us, our industry or ownership of our securities. If any of the following risks, or any other risks and uncertainties that are not addressed below or that we have not yet identified, actually occur, we could be materially adversely affected and the value of our securities could decline.
We
As set forth below, we believe that the risks we face generally fall into the following categories:

COVID-19 Risks
Our Business Operations and Strategy Risks
Environmental, Economic and Market Risks
Our Capital Structure Risks
Our Legal, Compliance and Regulatory Risks
Our REIT Status Risks

COVID-19 Risks

The ongoing COVID-19 pandemic and measures intended to prevent its spread have grouped these risk factors into three general categories:had and may continue to have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.
Risks arising from
The COVID-19 pandemic and measures to prevent its spread have materially negatively impacted our business;
Risks arising frombusinesses in a number of ways and is expected to continue to do so. For instance, operating costs at our capital structure; and
Risks arising from our statussenior housing communities have increased as a REIT.
Risks Arising from Our Business
Theresult of the introduction of public health measures and other operational and regulatory changes affecting our properties managed by Atria and Sunrise account for a significant portionour operations, while occupancy and revenue have decreased. Certain of our revenuestenants and operating income; adverse developments in Atria’smanagers have incurred significant costs or Sunrise’s businesslosses as a result of the pandemic, and affairs or financial condition could have a Material Adverse Effect on us.
As of December 31, 2017, Atria and Sunrise, collectively, managed 273 of our seniors housing communities pursuantmay continue to long-term management agreements. These properties represent a substantial portion of our portfolio, based on their gross book value, and account for a significant portion of our revenues and NOI. Although we have various rights as the property owner under our management agreements, we rely on Atria’s and Sunrise’s personnel, expertise, technical resources and information systems, proprietary information, good faith and judgment to manage our senior living operations. We also rely on Atria and Sunrise to set appropriate resident fees, to provide accurate property-level financial results for our properties in a timely manner and to otherwise operate our seniors housing communities in compliance with the terms of our management agreements and all applicable laws and regulations. For example, we depend on Atria’s and Sunrise’s ability to attract and retain skilled management personnel who are responsible for the day-to-day operations of our seniors housing communities. A shortage of nurses or other trained personnel or general inflationary pressures may force Atria or Sunrise to enhance its pay and benefits package to compete effectively for such personnel, but it may not be able to offset these added costs by increasing the

rates charged to residents. Any increase in labor costs and other property operating expenses, any failure by Atria or Sunrise to attract and retain qualified personnel, or significant changes in Atria’s or Sunrise’s senior management or equity ownershipdo so, which could adversely affect our results of operations.

Although we continue to undertake extensive efforts to ensure the income we receive from our seniors housing communities and have a Material Adverse Effect on us.
Because Atria and Sunrise managesafety of our properties, employees and residents and to provide operator support in exchangethis regard, the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on our facilities could result in additional operational costs. The effects of shelter-in-place and stay-at-home orders, including remote work arrangements for the receiptan extended period of a management fee from us, we aretime, could strain our business continuity plans, introduce operational risk, including but not directly exposedlimited to the credit risk ofcybersecurity risks, and impair our managers in the same manner or to the same extent as our triple-net tenants. However, any adverse developments in Atria’s or Sunrise’s business and affairs or financial condition could impair its ability to manage our properties efficientlybusiness. Further, we have and effectivelymay continue to implement mitigation and could have a Material Adverse Effect on us. If Atria or Sunrise experiences any significant financial, legal, accounting or regulatory difficulties dueother measures to a weak economy or otherwise, such difficultiessupport and protect our employees, which could result in amongincreased labor costs.

Senior housing facilities have been disproportionately impacted by COVID-19. The ongoing COVID-19 pandemic has, to varying degrees during the course of the pandemic, prevented prospective occupants and their families from visiting our senior housing communities and limited the ability of new occupants to move into our senior housing communities due to heightened move-in criteria and screening.Although the ongoing impact of the pandemic and vaccine deployment on occupancy remain uncertain, occupancy of our senior housing and triple-net properties could further decrease, and the effects of the COVID-19 pandemic could adversely affect demand for senior housing for an extended period.Such a decrease could affect the net operating income of our senior housing properties and the ability of our triple-net tenants to make contractual payments to us, which in turn, could adversely affect our financial condition, including our ability to pay dividend distributions at expected levels or at all.

Additionally, across our property types, the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic creates a heightened risk of tenant, borrower, manager or other adverseobligor bankruptcy or insolvency due to factors such as decreased occupancy, medical practice disruptions resulting from stay-at-home orders, increased health and safety and labor expenses or litigation resulting from developments related to the COVID-19 pandemic. In addition to the risks associated with such events accelerationelsewhere in these risk factors, various federal, state and local governments have enacted, and may continue to enact, laws regulations and moratoriums or take other actions that could limit our ability to evict tenants as a result of its indebtedness, impairmentthe COVID-19 pandemic. Although many of its continued accessthese moratoriums are expected to capital,be temporary in nature, they may be in place for a significant period of time until the enforcement of default remedies by its counterparties, or the commencement of insolvency proceedings by or against it under the U.S. Bankruptcy Code, any one or a combination of which indirectly couldCOVID-19 pandemic subsides. While we generally have a Material Adverse Effect on us.
Our leasesarrangements and other agreements with Brookdale Senior Living, Ardent and Kindred account for a significant portion of our revenues and operating income; any failure, inability or unwillingness by Brookdale Senior Living, Ardent or Kindred to satisfy its obligations under our agreements could have a Material Adverse Effect on us.
The properties we lease to Brookdale Senior Living, Ardent and Kindred account for a significant portion of our revenues and NOI, and we depend on Brookdale Senior Living, Ardent and Kindred to pay all insurance, taxes, utilities and maintenance and repair expenses in connection with the leased properties and properties that are collateral for the loans. We cannot assure you that Brookdale Senior Living, Ardent and Kindred will have sufficient assets, income and access to financing to enable them to satisfy their respective obligations to us, and any failure, inability or unwillingness by Brookdale Senior Living, Ardent or Kindred to do so could have a Material Adverse Effect on us. In addition, any failure by Brookdale Senior Living, Ardent or Kindred to effectively conduct its operations or to maintain and improve such properties could adversely affect its business reputation and its ability to attract and retain patients and residents in such properties, which could have a Material Adverse Effect on us. Brookdale Senior Living, Ardent and Kindred have agreed to indemnify, defend and hold us harmless from and against various claims, litigation and liabilities arising in connection with their respective businesses, and we cannot assure you that Brookdale Senior Living, Ardent and Kindred will have sufficient assets, income, access to financing and insurance coverage to enable them to satisfy their respective indemnification obligations.
We face potential adverse consequences from the bankruptcy, insolvency or financial deterioration of one or more of our tenants, operators, borrowers, managers and other obligors.
We lease our properties to unaffiliated tenants or operate them through independent third-party managers. We are also a direct or indirect lender to various tenants and operators.  We have very limited control over the success or failure of our tenants’ and operators’ businesses and, at any time, a tenant or operator may experience a downturn in its business that weakens its financial condition. If that happens, the tenant or operator may fail to make its payments to us when due. Although our lease, loan and management agreements give us the right under specified circumstances to exerciseterminate a lease or evict a tenant for nonpayment, such laws, regulations and moratoriums will generally prohibit our ability to begin eviction proceedings even where no rent or only partial rent is being paid for so long as such law, regulation or moratorium remains in effect. We may incur significant costs and it may take a significant amount of time to ultimately evict any tenant who is not meeting its contractual rent obligations. If we cannot transition a leased property to a
14


new tenant due to the effects of the COVID-19 pandemic or for other reasons, we may take possession of that property, which may expose us to certain remediessuccessor liabilities.

The COVID-19 pandemic and reactions to it have also adversely affected the U.S. economy and global financial markets and, in the eventlonger term, could result in a global economic downturn and a recession, or inflation, which may, in turn negatively impact our results of defaultoperations. The COVID-19 pandemic has increased, and may continue to increase, the magnitude of many of the other risks described herein.

The trajectory and future impact of the COVID-19 pandemic remains highly uncertain. The extent of the pandemic’s continuing and ultimate effect on our operational and financial performance will depend on a variety of factors, including the obligations owingspeed at which available vaccines can be successfully deployed; the rate of acceptance of available vaccines, particularly among the residents and staff in our senior housing communities; the impact of new variants of the virus and the effectiveness of available vaccines against those variants; ongoing clinical experience, which may differ considerably across regions and fluctuate over time; and on other future developments, including the ultimate duration, spread and intensity of the outbreak, the availability of testing, the extent to us, we may determine not to do so if we believe that enforcementwhich governments impose, rollback or re-impose preventative restrictions and the availability of our rights would be more detrimentalongoing government financial support to our business, than seeking alternative approaches.
A downturn in any of our tenants’ or operators’ businesses could ultimately leadtenants and operators. Due to bankruptcy if it is unablethese uncertainties, we are not able at this time to timely resolveestimate the underlying causes, which may be largely outside of its control. Bankruptcy and insolvency laws afford certain rights to a party that has filed for bankruptcy or reorganization that may render certain of these remedies unenforceable, or, at the least, delay our ability to pursue such remedies and realize any recoveries in connection therewith. For example, we cannot evict a tenant or operator solely because of its bankruptcy filing.
A debtor-lessee may reject our lease in a bankruptcy proceeding, in which case our claim against the debtor-lessee for unpaid and future rents would be limited by the statutory capultimate impact of the U.S. Bankruptcy Code. This statutory cap could be substantially less than the remaining rent actually owed under the lease, and any claim we have for unpaid rent might not be paid in full. In addition, a debtor-lessee may assert in a bankruptcy proceeding that our lease should be re-characterized as a financing agreement, in which case our rights and remedies as a lender, compared to a landlord, generally would be more limited. If a debtor-manager seeks bankruptcy protection, the automatic stay provisions of the U.S. Bankruptcy Code would preclude us from enforcing our remedies against the manager unless relief is first obtained from the court having jurisdiction over the bankruptcy case. In any of these events, we also may be required to fund certain expenses and obligations (e.g., real estate taxes, debt costs and maintenance expenses) to preserve the value of our properties, avoid the imposition of liensCOVID-19 pandemic on our properties or transition our properties to a new tenant, operator or manager.
Bankruptcy or insolvency proceedings may also result in increased costs to the operator and significant management distraction. If we are unable to transition affected properties, they could experience prolonged operational disruption, leading to lower occupancy rates and further depressed revenues. Publicity about the operator’sbusiness, results of operations, financial condition and insolvencycash flows.


proceedings may also negativelyThere is a high degree of uncertainty regarding the implementation and impact theirof the CARES Act and other pandemic-related legislation and any future COVID-19 relief measures. There can be no assurance as to the total amount of financial assistance we or our reputations, decreasing customer demandtenants or borrowers will receive or that we will be able to benefit from provisions intended to increase access to resources and revenues. Anyease regulatory burdens for healthcare providers.

In response to the COVID-19 pandemic, the CARES Act, the PPPHCE Act, and the CAA authorize a total of $178 billion to be distributed to healthcare providers through the Provider Relief Fund, which is administered by HHS. These grants are intended to reimburse eligible providers for healthcare-related expenses or all of these risks could have a Material Adverse Effect on us. These risks would be magnified where we lease multiple propertieslost revenues attributable to a single operator under a master lease, as an operator failure or default under a master lease would expose usCOVID-19. Recipients are not required to these risks across multiple properties.
We have rightsrepay distributions from the Provider Relief Fund, provided that they attest to terminate our management agreements with Atria and Sunrise in whole or with respect to specific properties under certain circumstances, and we may be unable to replace Atria or Sunrise if our management agreements are terminated or not renewed.
We are parties to long-term management agreements pursuant to which Atria and Sunrise, collectively, provided comprehensive property management and accounting services with respect to 273 of our seniors housing communities as of December 31, 2017. Most of our management agreements with Atria have terms expiring either July 31, 2024 or December 31, 2027, with successive automatic ten-year renewal periods, and our management agreements with Sunrise have terms ranging from 25 to 30 years (which commenced as early as 2004 and as recently as 2012). Our ability to terminate these long-term management agreements is limited to specific circumstances set forth in the agreements and may relate to all properties or a specific property or group of properties.
We may terminate any of our Atria management agreements upon the occurrence of an event of default by Atria in the performance of a material covenant or term thereof (including, in certain circumstances, the revocation of any license or certificate necessary for operation), subject in most cases to Atria’s right to cure such default, or upon the occurrence of certain insolvency events relating to Atria. In addition, we may terminate our management agreements with Atria based on the failure to achieve certain NOI targets or upon the payment of a fee.
Similarly, we may terminate any of our Sunrise management agreements upon the occurrence of an event of default by Sunrise in the performance of a material covenant or term thereof (including, in certain circumstances, the revocation of any license or certificate necessary for operation), subject in most cases to Sunrise’s right to cure such default, or upon the occurrence of certain insolvency events relating to Sunrise. We also may terminate most of our management agreements with Sunrise based on the failure to achieve certain NOI targets or to comply with certain expense control covenants, subjectterms and conditions, including reporting requirements, limitations on balance billing, and not using grants received from the Provider Relief Fund to certain rightsreimburse expenses or losses that other sources are obligated to reimburse maintaining records, and cooperating with any government audits.

HHS began distributing Provider Relief Fund grants in April 2020 and has made grants available to various provider groups in phases. We applied for grants under Phase 2 and Phase 3 of Sunrisethe Provider Relief Fund on behalf of the assisted living communities in our senior living operations segment and may apply for additional grants in the future. While we have received all amounts under our Phase 2 applications, and have begun to make cure paymentsreceive amounts under our Phase 3 applications, there can be no assurance that all our remaining applications will be approved or that additional grants will ultimately be received in full or in part. Any grants that are ultimately received and retained by us are not expected to us, and uponfully offset the occurrence of certain other events or the existence of certain other conditions.
We continuallylosses incurred in our senior living operating portfolio that are attributable to COVID-19. Further, although we continue to monitor and assess our contractual rightsevaluate the terms and remedies under our management agreementsconditions associated with Atria and Sunrise. When determining whether to pursue any existing or future rights or remedies under those agreements, including termination rights, we consider numerous factors, including legal, contractual, regulatory, business and other relevant considerations. In the event that we exercise our rights to terminate the Atria or Sunrise management agreements for any reason or such agreements are not renewed upon expiration of their terms, we would attempt to reposition the affected properties with another manager. Although we believe that many qualified national and regional seniors housing operators would be interested in managing our seniors housing communities,Provider Relief Fund distributions, we cannot assure you that we wouldwill be ablein compliance with all requirements related to locate another suitable manager or, if we are successful in locating such a manager, that it would manage the properties effectively. Moreover,payments received under the transition to a replacement manager would require approval by the applicable regulatory authorities and, in most cases, the mortgage lenders for the properties, and we cannot assure you that such approvals would be granted on a timely basis, if at all. Any inability to replace, or a lengthy delay in replacing, Atria or Sunrise as the manager of our seniors housing communities following termination or non-renewal of the applicable management agreements could have a Material Adverse Effect on us.
Provider Relief Fund. If we must replaceor any of our tenants fail to comply with all of the terms and conditions, we or operators, we mightthey may be unablerequired to repositionrepay some or all of the properties on as favorable terms, or at all,grants received and we couldmay be subject to delays, limitations and expenses,other enforcement action, which could have a Material Adverse Effectmaterial adverse impact on us.our business and financial condition.
We cannot predict whether our tenants will renew existing leases beyond their current term. If our leases with Brookdale Senior Living or Ardent, the Kindred master leases or any
The CARES Act and related legislation also make other forms of our other triple-net leases are not renewed, we would attemptfinancial assistance available to reposition those properties with another tenant or operator. In case of non-renewal, we generally have one year prior to expirationhealthcare providers, including through Medicare and Medicaid payment adjustments and an expansion of the lease termMedicare Accelerated and Advance Payment Program, which makes available accelerated payments of Medicare funds in order to arrangeincrease cash flow to providers in the form of loans that must be repaid. In addition to financial assistance, the CARES Act and related legislation include provisions intended to increase access to medical supplies and equipment and ease legal and regulatory burdens on healthcare providers. Many of these measures are effective only for repositioningthe duration of the propertiesfederal public health emergency that was declared as a result of the COVID-19 pandemic. The current public health emergency determination expires April 21, 2021, and HHS has indicated that it likely will be extended but the duration of the extension is unclear. The HHS Secretary may choose to renew the declaration for successive 90-day periods for as long as the emergency continues to exist and may terminate the declaration whenever he determines that the public health emergency no longer exists.

Due to the recent enactment of the CARES Act, and other enacted legislation, there is still a high degree of uncertainty surrounding their implementation. Further, the federal government is considering additional financial measures, federal agencies continue to issue related regulations and guidance, and the public health emergency continues to evolve. It is difficult to predict the extent to which anticipated ongoing negative effects of the COVID-19 pandemic on us and our tenants are required to continue to perform alland
15


borrowers will be offset by benefits which we may recognize or receive in the future under existing or future financial measures. Further, there can be no assurance that the terms and conditions of their obligations (including the payment of all rental amounts) for the non-renewed assets until such expiration. However, following expiration of a lease term or if we exercise our right to replace a tenant or operator in default, rental payments on the related properties could decline or cease altogether while we reposition the properties with a suitable replacement tenant or operator. We also might not be successful in identifying suitable replacements or entering into leasesProvider Relief Fund grants or other arrangements with new tenantsprograms will not change or operators on a timely basis or on terms as favorable to us as our current leases, if at all, and we may be required to fund certain expenses and obligations (e.g., real estate taxes, debt costs and maintenance expenses) to preserve the value of, and avoid the imposition of liens on, our properties while they are being repositioned. In addition, we may incur certain obligations and liabilities, including obligations to indemnify the replacement tenant or operator, which could have a Material Adverse Effect on us.

In the event of non-renewal or a tenant default, our ability to reposition our properties with a suitable replacement tenant or operator could be significantly delayed or limited by state licensing, receivership, CON or other laws, as well as by the Medicare and Medicaid change-of-ownership rules, and we could incur substantial additional expensesinterpreted in connection with any licensing, receivership or change-of-ownership proceedings. Our ability to locate and attract suitable replacement tenants also could be impaired by the specialized healthcare uses or contractual restrictions on use of the properties, and we may be forced to spend substantial amounts to adapt the properties to other uses. Any such delays, limitations and expenses could adversely impact our ability to collect rent, obtain possession of leased properties or otherwise exercise remedies for tenant default and could have a Material Adverse Effect on us.
Moreover, in connection with certain of our properties, we have entered into intercreditor agreements with the tenants’ lenders or tri-party agreements with our lenders. Our ability to exercise remedies under the applicable leases or management agreements or to reposition the applicable properties may be significantly delayed or limited by the terms of the intercreditor agreement or tri-party agreement. Any such delay or limit on our rights and remedies could adverselyways that affect our ability to mitigatecomply with such terms and conditions (which could affect our lossesability to retain any grants that we receive), the amount of total financial grants we may ultimately receive or our eligibility to participate in any future funding. We continue to assess the potential impact of the COVID-19 pandemic and could have a Material Adverse Effect on us.
Merger and acquisition activity or consolidation ingovernment responses to the seniors housing and healthcare industries resulting in a change of control of, or a competitor’s investment in, one or more of our tenants, operators or managers could have a Material Adverse Effect on us.
The seniors housing and healthcare industries have recently experienced increased consolidation, including among owners of real estate and care providers. We compete with other healthcare REITs, healthcare providers, healthcare lenders, real estate partnerships, banks, insurance companies, private equity firms and other investors that pursue a variety of investments, which may include investments in our tenants, operators or managers. A competitor’s investment in one of our tenants, operators or managers could enable our competitor to influence that tenant’s, operator’s or manager’s business and strategy in a manner that impairs our relationship with the tenant, operator or manager or is otherwise adverse to our interests. Dependingpandemic on our contractual agreementsbusiness, financial condition and the specific factsresults of operations.

Our Business Operations and circumstances, we may have the right to consent to, or otherwise exercise rights and remedies, including termination rights, on account of, a competitor’s investment in, a change of control of, or other transactions impacting a tenant, operator or manager. In deciding whether to exercise our rights and remedies, including termination rights, we assess numerous factors, including legal, contractual, regulatory, business and other relevant considerations. In addition, in connection with any change of control of a tenant, operator or manager, the tenant’s, operator’s or manager’s management team may change, which could lead to a change in the tenant’s, operator’s or manager’s strategy or adversely affect the business of the tenant, operator or manager, either of which could have a Material Adverse Effect on us.Strategy Risks

Market conditions, including, but not limited to, interest rateseconomic and credit spreads, the availability of creditfinancial market events or conditions and the actual and perceived state of the real estate markets and public capital markets generally could negatively impact our business, financial condition and results of operations,operations.

We are dependent on the capital markets and financial condition.
any disruption to the capital markets or our ability to access such markets could impair our ability to fulfill our dividend requirements, make payments to our security holders or otherwise finance our business operations. The markets in which we operate are affected by a number of factors that are largely beyond our control but may nevertheless have a significant negative impact on us. These factors include, but are not limited to:
Interest rates and credit spreads; 
TheAdverse developments affecting economies throughout the world, including a general tightening of availability of credit including(including the price, terms and conditions under which it can be obtained; and
Theobtained), the state of the public capital markets, decreased liquidity in certain financial markets, increased interest rates, foreign exchange fluctuations, declining consumer confidence, the actual andor perceived state of the real estate market, sustained high levels of unemployment or significant declines in stock markets, as well as concerns regarding pandemics, epidemics and the marketspread of contagious diseases, could impact our business, financial condition and results of operations. For example, unfavorable changes in general economic conditions, including recessions, economic slowdowns, high unemployment and rising prices or the perception by consumers of weak or weakening economic conditions may reduce disposable income and impact consumer spending in healthcare or seniors housing, for dividend-paying stocks and public capital markets in general.example, which could adversely affect our financial results.

In addition, increased inflation may have a pronounced negative impact on the interest expense we pay in connection with our outstanding indebtedness, andin our general and administrative expenses, as these costs could increase at a rate higher than our rents.
Deflationrents, or in the wages that our managers or tenants are obligated to pay. Conversely, deflation may result in a decline in general price levels, often caused by a decrease in the supply of money or credit. The predominant effects of deflation are high unemployment, credit contraction and weakened consumer demand. Restricted lending practices may impact our ability to obtain financing for our properties, which could adversely impact our growth and profitability.

To the extent there is turmoil in the global financial markets, this turmoil has the potential to adversely affect (i) the value of our properties; (ii) the availability or the terms of financing that we have or may be able to obtain; (iii) our ability to make principal and interest payments on, or refinance when due, any outstanding debt; (iv) our ability to pay a dividend and (v) the ability of our tenants to enter into new leasing transactions or satisfy rental payments under existing leases. Disruptions in the capital and credit markets may also adversely affect the market price of our securities.

Third parties must operate our non-Office assets, limiting our control and influence over operations and results.

Although we often have certain general oversight approval rights (e.g., with respect to budgets, material contracts, etc.) and the right to review operational and financial reporting information with respect to a majority of our portfolio, our third-party managers and tenants are ultimately in control of the day-to-day business of the property. As a result, we have limited rights to direct or influence the business or operations of the properties in our portfolio and we depend on third parties to operate these properties in a manner that complies with applicable law, minimizes legal risk and maximizes the value of our investment. The failure by such third parties to operate these properties efficiently and effectively and adequately manage the related risks could adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.

Our ongoing strategy depends,operating assets may expose us to various operational risks, liabilities and claims that could adversely affect our ability to generate revenues or increase our costs and could adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.

Despite our limited rights to direct or influence the business or operations of the properties in part, upon future investmentsour senior living operations segment, as the owner and operator of senior housing operating properties, we are ultimately responsible for all operational risks and other liabilities of such properties, other than those arising out of certain actions by our managers, such as gross negligence or willful misconduct. These risks include, and our resulting revenues are impacted by, among other things, fluctuations in occupancy levels, the inability to achieve economic resident fees (including anticipated increases in those fees), increases in the cost of food, materials, energy, labor (as a result of unionization or otherwise) or other services, rent control
16


regulations, national and acquisitionsregional economic conditions, the imposition of new or increased taxes, capital expenditure requirements, changes in management or equity, accounting misstatements, professional and general liability claims, and the availability and cost of insurance. Any one or a combination of these factors could result in deficiencies in our senior living operations segment, which could adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations. Such operational risks could also arise as a result of our ownership of office buildings, and which could also adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.

Further, we generally hold the applicable healthcare license and enroll in applicable government healthcare programs on behalf of the properties in our senior living operations segment. This subjects us to potential liability under various healthcare laws and regulations. Healthcare laws and regulations are wide-ranging, and noncompliance may result in the imposition of civil, criminal, and administrative penalties, including: the loss or suspension of accreditation, licenses or CONs; suspension of or non-payment for new admissions; denial of reimbursement; fines; suspension, decertification, or exclusion from federal and state healthcare programs; or facility closure.

Decreases in our developmenttenants’, borrowers’ or redevelopmentmanagers’ revenues, or increases in their expenses, could affect their ability to meet their financial and other contractual obligations to us, which could adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.

We have limited control over the success or failure of our tenants’, borrowers’ and managers’ businesses, regardless of whether our relationship is structured as a triple-net lease, a management contract or as a lender to our tenants. While we do not expressly take on liability on the properties in our triple-net leased or office operations segments, our business, financial condition and results of operations could suffer as a result of the risks outlined below. Any of our tenants, borrowers or managers may experience a downturn in their business that materially weakens their financial condition.For example, many of our tenants, borrowers and managers have experienced significant downturns in their businesses due to the COVID-19 pandemic, including as a result of interruptions in their operations, lost revenues, increased costs, financing difficulties and labor shortages.As a result, they may be unable or unwilling to make payments or perform their obligations when due.Although we generally have arrangements and other agreements that give us the right under specified circumstances to terminate a lease, evict a tenant or terminate our management agreements, or demand immediate repayment of outstanding loan amounts or other obligations to us, we may not be able to enforce such rights or we may determine not to do so if we believe that enforcement of our rights would be more detrimental to our business than seeking alternative approaches.

Our senior housing tenants and managers primarily depend on private pay sources consisting of the income or assets of residents or their family members to pay fees. Costs associated with independent and assisted living services generally are not reimbursable under government reimbursement programs, such as Medicare and Medicaid. Accordingly, our tenants and managers of our senior housing business depend on attracting seniors with appropriate levels of income and assets, which may be affected by many factors, including: (i) prevailing economic and market trends, including the ongoing economic downturn and high unemployment rates; (ii) consumer confidence; (iii) demographics; (iv) property condition and safety, including as a result of a severe cold and flu season, an epidemic or any other widespread illness, such as seen throughout the COVID-19 pandemic; (v) public perception about such properties; and (vi) social and environmental factors.Consequently, if our tenants or managers on our behalf fail to effectively conduct their operations, or to maintain and improve our properties, it could adversely affect our business reputation as the owner of the properties, as well as the business reputation of our tenants or managers and their ability to attract and retain patients and residents in our properties, which could have an adverse effect on our and our tenant’s or manager’s business, financial condition and results of operations.Further, if widespread default or nonpayment of outstanding obligations from a large number of tenants or managers occurs at a time when terminating such agreement or replacing such tenants or managers may be extremely difficult or impossible, including as a result of the COVID-19 pandemic, we may elect instead to amend such agreements with such tenants or managers.However, such amendment may be on terms that are less favorable to us than the original agreement and may have a material adverse effect on our results of operations and financial condition.

Our senior housing tenants and managers may also rely on reimbursements from governmental programs for a portion of the revenues from certain properties. Changes in reimbursement policies and other governmental regulation, that may result from actions by Congress or executive orders, may result in reductions in our tenants’ or managers’ revenues, operations and cash flows and affect our tenants’ or managers’ ability to meet their obligations to us. In addition, failure to comply with reimbursement regulations or other laws applicable to healthcare providers could result in penalties, fines, litigation costs, lost revenue or other consequences, which could adversely impact our tenants’ ability to make contractual rent payments to us under a triple-net lease or our cash flows from operations under a management arrangement.

Our tenants and managers have, and may continue to seek to, offset losses by obtaining funds under the recently adopted CARES Act or other similar legislative initiatives at the state and local level. It is indeterminable when or if these
17


government funds will ultimately be received by our tenants and managers or whether these funds may materially offset the cash flow disruptions experienced by them. If they are unable to obtain these funds within a reasonable time period or at all, or the conditions precedent to receiving these funds are overly burdensome or not feasible, it may substantially affect their ability to make payments or perform their obligations when due to us.

A significant portion of our revenues and operating income is dependent on a limited number of tenants and managers, including Brookdale Senior Living, Ardent, Kindred, Atria and Sunrise.

As of December 31, 2020, Atria and Sunrise, collectively, managed 258 of our consolidated senior housing communities pursuant to long-term management agreements. Additionally, as of December 31, 2020, our three largest tenants, Brookdale Senior Living, Ardent and Kindred leased from us 121 properties, 12 properties and 32 properties respectively. These properties represent a substantial portion of our portfolio, based on their gross book value, and account for a significant portion of our revenues and NOI.

We depend on Brookdale Senior Living, Ardent and Kindred to pay all property-related expenses, including maintenance, utilities, repairs, taxes, insurance and capital expenditures, and to comply with the terms of the mortgage financing documents, if any, affecting the properties they lease from us. We cannot assure you that they will have sufficient assets, income and access to financing to enable them to satisfy their obligations to us, and any failure, inability or unwillingness by them to do so could adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations. In addition, any failure by any one of Brookdale Senior Living, Ardent or Kindred to conduct effectively its operations or to maintain and improve the properties it leases from us could adversely affect its business reputation and its ability to attract and retain patients or residents in such properties, which could in turn adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations. These tenants have agreed to indemnify, defend and hold us harmless from and against various claims, litigation and liabilities arising in connection with their respective businesses. We cannot assure you that they will have sufficient assets, income, access to financing and insurance coverage to enable them to satisfy those obligations.

We rely on a relatively small number of third-party managers, including Atria and Sunrise, to manage a significant number of the properties in our senior living operations segment and to set appropriate resident fees, provide accurate property-level financial results for our properties in a timely manner and otherwise operate our senior housing communities in compliance with the terms of our management agreements and all applicable laws and regulations. Any adverse developments in such managers’ business and affairs or financial condition could impair their ability to manage our properties efficiently and effectively and could adversely affect the financial performance of our properties and our business, financial condition and results of operations. If any one of our managers experience financial, legal, accounting or regulatory difficulties, such difficulties could result in, among other adverse events, impacts to its financial stability, acceleration of its indebtedness, impairment of its continued access to capital, the enforcement of default remedies by its counterparties, or the commencement of insolvency proceedings by or against it, any one or a combination of which could adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.

In the event that any of our tenants or managers merge with one another, our dependence on a small group of significant third parties would increase, as would our exposure to the risks described above.

If we need to replace any of our tenants or managers, we may be unable to do so on as favorable terms, or at all, and we could be subject to delays, limitations and expenses, which could adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.

Our tenants may not renew their leases with us, and our managers may not renew their management agreements with us, beyond their current terms. Our leases and management agreements also provide us, our tenants and our managers with termination rights in certain circumstances. If our leases or management agreements are not renewed or are otherwise terminated, we would attempt to reposition those properties with another tenant or manager, as applicable. We may not be successful in identifying suitable replacements or entering into leases, management agreements or other arrangements with new tenants or managers on a timely basis or on terms as favorable to us as our current leases or management agreements, if at all, and consummating these transactions.we may be required to fund certain expenses and obligations (e.g., real estate taxes, debt costs and maintenance expenses) to preserve the value of, and avoid the imposition of liens on, our properties while they are being repositioned.
An important
During transition periods to new tenants or managers, the attention of existing tenants or operators may be diverted from the performance of the properties, which could cause the financial and operational performance at those properties to decline. Our ability to reposition our properties with a suitable replacement tenant or manager could be significantly delayed or limited by state licensing, receivership, certificates of need (“CON”) or other laws, as well as by the Medicare and Medicaid
18


change-of-ownership rules, and we could incur substantial additional expenses in connection with any licensing, receivership or change-of-ownership proceedings.

In the case of our leased properties, following expiration of a lease term or if we exercise our right to replace a tenant in default, rental payments on the related properties could decline or cease altogether while we reposition the properties with a suitable replacement tenant. This risk could be exacerbated by new laws and regulations enacted during the COVID-19 pandemic that limit our ability to take remedial action against defaulted tenants. Further, our competitors may offer space at rental rates below current market rates or below the rental rates we currently charge, we may lose potential tenants, and we may be pressured to reduce our rental rates below those we currently charge to retain tenants when leases expire. Our ability to locate and attract suitable replacement tenants also could be impaired by the specialized healthcare uses or contractual restrictions on use of the properties, and we may be forced to spend substantial amounts to adapt the properties to other uses.

In the event of borrower defaults, we may be unable to foreclose successfully on the collateral securing our loans and other investments, and even if we are successful in our foreclosure efforts, we may be unable to sell successfully any acquired equity interests or reposition any acquired properties, which could adversely affect our ability to recover our investments.

If a borrower defaults under mortgage or other loans for which we are the lender, we may attempt to foreclose on the collateral securing those loans, including by acquiring any pledged equity interests or acquiring title to the subject properties, to protect our investment. In response, the defaulting borrower may contest our enforcement of foreclosure or other available remedies, seek bankruptcy protection against our exercise of enforcement or other available remedies, or bring claims against us for lender liability. Any such delay or limit on our ability to pursue our rights or remedies could adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.

Even if we successfully foreclose on the collateral securing our mortgage loans and other investments, costs related to enforcement of our remedies, high loan-to-value ratios or declines in the value of the collateral could prevent us from realizing the full amount of our loans, and we could be required to record a valuation allowance for such losses. Moreover, the collateral may include equity interests that may have incurred unexpected liabilities or other limiting characteristics that may result in us not having full recourse to assets within that entity’s subsidiary structure. For example, our mezzanine loan investments are subordinate to senior secured loans held by other investors that encumber the same real estate, and, in certain circumstances, affords them the ability to extinguish our rights in the collateral, subject to our rights under market and customary co-lender contractual arrangements. In addition, we may not be able to sell the acquired assets or equity interests due to securities law restrictions or otherwise. We may be unable to reposition the properties with new tenants, borrowers or managers on a timely basis, if at all, or without making improvements or repairs. Any delay or costs incurred in selling or repositioning acquired collateral could adversely affect our ability to recover our investments.

Our success depends, in part, on our ability to attract and retain talented employees, and the loss of any one of our key personnel could adversely impact our business.

The success of our business strategydepends, in part, on the leadership and performance of our executive management team and key employees. Failure to attract, retain and motivate highly qualified employees, or failure to develop and implement a viable succession plan, could result in inadequate depth of institutional knowledge, an ineffective culture or lack of certain skill sets, significantly impacting our future performance and adversely affecting our business. Competition for talented employees is intense, and we cannot assure you that we will retain our key officers and employees or that we will be able to continueattract and retain other highly qualified individuals in the future. COVID-19 could also negatively affect the health, availability and productivity of our current personnel and could impact our ability to expandrecruit and diversifyattract new employees and retain current employees, particularly as remote work arrangements and their impact on the market for talent remains uncertain. In addition, while we have long-term compensation plans designed to retain our portfolio through accretive acquisition, investment, developmentsenior executives, if our retention and redevelopment opportunitiessuccession plans are not effective, or if we lose any one or more of our key officers and employees, our business could be adversely affected.

Our investments are concentrated across a variety of assets classes within healthcare real estate, making us more vulnerable to adverse changes in domesticthose asset classes and international seniorsthe real estate industry generally.

We invest in a variety of assets classes in healthcare real estate, including senior housing, R&I and healthcare properties. Our execution of this strategy by successfully identifying, securing and consummating beneficial transactions is made more challenging by increased competition andWhile we endeavor to invest in a diversified portfolio, there can be affected by many factors, includingno assurance that in a particular economic or operational environment that all assets will perform equally well or that our balance sheet will be appropriately balanced. Each of our asset classes are subject to their own dynamics and their own specific operational, financial, compliance, regulatory and market risks.


relationships with current and prospective clients, our ability to obtain debt and equity capital at costs comparable to
19


Additionally, a broad downturn or better than our competitors and lower thanslowdown in the yield we earnhealthcare real estate sector could have a greater adverse impact on our acquisitionsbusiness than if we had investments in multiple industries and could negatively impact the ability of our tenants, borrowers and managers to meet their obligations to us. A downturn or investments,slowdown in any one of our asset classes could adversely affect the value of our properties in such asset class and our ability to negotiatesell such properties at prices or on terms acceptable or favorable terms with property owners seekingto us.

In addition, we are exposed to the risks inherent in concentrating our investments in real estate. Real estate investments are relatively illiquid, and our ability to quickly sell or exchange our properties in response to changes in economic or other conditions is limited. In the event we market any of our properties for sale, the value of those properties and our ability to sell and other contractual counterparties. Our competitors for these opportunities include other healthcare REITs,at prices or on terms acceptable to us could be adversely affected by a downturn in the real estate partnerships,industry. In addition, transfers of healthcare providers, healthcare lenders and other investors, including developers, banks, insurance companies, pension funds, government-sponsored entities and private equity firms, some of whom may have greater financial resources and lower costs of capital than we do. See “Business—Competition” included in Item 1 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K. If we are unsuccessful at identifying and capitalizing on investment, acquisition, development and redevelopment opportunities, our growth and profitabilityreal estate may be subject to regulatory approvals that are not required for transfers of other types of commercial real estate. We cannot assure you that we will recognize the full value of any property that we sell for liquidity or other reasons, and the inability to respond quickly to changes in the performance of our investments could adversely affected.affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.

Our investments in and acquisitions of properties may be unsuccessful or fail to meet our expectations.

We have made and expect to continue to make significant acquisitions and investments as part of our overall business strategy. Investments in and acquisitions of seniors housing and healthcare propertiesreal estate entail risks associated with real estate investments generally, including risks that the investment will not achieve expected returns, that the cost estimates for necessary property improvements will prove inaccurate or that thea tenant, operatorborrower or manager will fail to meet performance expectations. Investments outside the United States raise legal, economic and market risks associated with doing business in foreign countries, such as currency exchange fluctuations, costly regulatory requirements and foreign tax risks. Domestic and international real estate development and redevelopment projects present additional risks, including construction delays or cost overruns that increase expenses, the inability to obtain required zoning, occupancy and other governmental approvals and permits on a timely basis, and the incurrence of significant costs prior to completion of the project. Furthermore, healthcare real estate properties are often highly customized, and the development or redevelopment of such properties may require costly tenant-specific improvements. As a result, we cannot assure you that we will achieve the economic benefit we expect from acquisition, investment, development and redevelopment opportunities.
Our significant acquisition and investment activity presents certain risks to our business and operations.
We have made and expect to continue to make significant acquisitions and investments as part of our overall business strategy. Our significant acquisition and investment activity presents certain risks to our business and operations, including, among other things, that:

We may be unable to integrate successfully integrate the operations, personnel or systems of acquired companies, maintain consistent standards, controls, policies and procedures, or realize the anticipated benefits of acquisitions and other investments within the anticipated time frame, or at all;

We may be unable to effectively monitor and manage our expanded portfolio of properties effectively, retain key employees or attract highly qualified new employees;

Projections of estimated future revenues, costs savings or operating metrics that we develop during the due diligence and integration planning process might be inaccurate;

Our leverage could increase or our per share financial results could decline if we incur additional debt or issue equity securities to finance acquisitions and investments;

Acquisitions and other new investments could divert management’s attention from our existing assets; or

The value of acquired assets or the market price of our common stock may decline; anddecline.
We may be unable to continue paying dividends at the current rate.
We cannot assure you that weour acquisitions, developments, redevelopments and other investments will be able to integrate acquisitions and investmentssuccessful or meet our expectations without encountering difficulties or that any such difficulties will not have a Material Adverse Effect on us.
If the liabilities we assume in connection with acquisitions, including indemnification obligations in favor of third parties, are greater than expected, or if there are unknown liabilities,adversely affect our business, could be materially and adversely affected.
We may assume or incur liabilities in connection with our acquisitions, including, in some cases, contingent liabilities. As we integrate these acquisitions, we may learn additional information about the sellers, the properties, their operations and their liabilities that adversely affects us, such as:
Liabilities relating to the clean-up or remediation of undisclosed environmental conditions;
Unasserted claims of vendors or other persons dealing with the sellers;
Liabilities, claims and litigation, including indemnification obligations, whether or not incurred in the ordinary course of business, relating to periods prior to or following our acquisition;
Claims for indemnification by general partners, directors, officers and others indemnified by the sellers; and
Liabilities for taxes relating to periods prior to our acquisition.

As a result, we cannot assure you that our past or future acquisitions will be successful or will not, in fact, harm our business. Among other things, if the liabilities we assume in connection with acquisitions are greater than expected, or if we discover obligations relating to the acquired properties or businesses of which we were not aware at the time of acquisition, our businessfinancial condition and results of operations couldoperations.

Our ongoing strategy depends, in part, upon identifying and consummating future investments and effectively managing our expansion opportunities.

An important part of our business strategy is to continue to expand and diversify our portfolio, directly or indirectly with third parties, through accretive acquisition, investment, development and redevelopment activities in domestic and international healthcare real estate. Our execution of this strategy by successfully identifying, securing and consummating beneficial transactions is made more challenging by increased competition and can be materiallyaffected by many factors, including our
20


relationships with current and prospective clients and partners, our ability to obtain debt and equity capital at costs comparable to or better than our competitors and lower than the yield we earn on our acquisitions or investments, and our ability to negotiate favorable terms with property owners seeking to sell and other contractual counterparties. We compete for these opportunities with a broad variety of potential investors, including other healthcare REITs, real estate partnerships, healthcare providers, healthcare lenders and other investors, including developers, banks, insurance companies, pension funds, government-sponsored entities and private equity firms, some of whom may have greater financial resources and lower costs of capital than we do. See “Business—Competition” included in Part I, Item 1 of this Annual Report. If we are unsuccessful at identifying and capitalizing on investment, acquisition, development and redevelopment opportunities and otherwise expanding and diversifying our portfolio, our growth and profitability may be adversely affected.
In addition,
For example, we recently expanded into R&I and life sciences. When expanding into areas that are new to us, we face numerous risks and uncertainties, including risks associated with (i) the required investment of capital and other resources; (ii) the possibility that we have now,insufficient expertise to engage in such activities profitably or without incurring inappropriate amounts of risk; (iii) the diversion of management’s attention from our other businesses; (iv) the increasing demands on or issues related to operational and may have in the future, certain surviving indemnification obligations in favor of third parties under the terms of acquisition agreements tomanagement systems and controls; (v) compliance with additional legal or regulatory requirements with which we are a party.  Most of these indemnification obligations will be capped as to amountnot familiar; and survival period, and we do not believe that these obligations will be material in(vi) the aggregate.  However, there can be no assurances as to the ultimate amount of such obligations or whether such obligations will have a Material Adverse Effect on us.
Our future results will suffer if we do not effectively manage the expansionbroadening of our hospital and life science portfolios andgeographic footprint, including the risks associated with conducting operations following the acquisition of AHS and the Life Sciences Acquisition.

As a result of our acquisition of Ardent Medical Services, Inc. (“AHS”) in 2015, we entered into the general acute care hospital sector. Also, as a result of the acquisition of substantially all of the university affiliated life science real estate assets of Wexford Science & Technology, LLC (“Wexford”) in 2016 (the “Life Sciences Acquisition”), we entered into the university-affiliated life science sector. Part of our long-term business strategy involves expanding our hospital and life science portfolios through additional acquisitions and development of new properties. Both the asset management of our existing general acute care hospital and university-affiliated life science and innovation centers portfolios and such additional acquisitions and developments may involve complex challenges. Our future success will depend, in part, upon our ability to manage our expansion opportunities, integrate new investments into our existing business in an efficient and timely manner, successfully monitor the operations, costs, regulatory compliance and service quality of our operators and leverage our relationships with Ardent and other operators of hospitals and Wexford and other operators and developers of life science and innovation centers. It is possible that our expansion or acquisition opportunities within the general acute care hospital and life science sectors will not be successful, which could adversely impact our growth and future results.
Our investments are concentrated in seniors housing and healthcare real estate, making us more vulnerable economically to adverse changes in the real estate market and the seniors housing and healthcare industries than if our investments were diversified.
We invest primarily in seniors housing and healthcare properties and are constrained by the terms of our existing indebtedness from making investments outside those industries. This investment focus exposes us to greater economic risk than if our portfolio were to include real estate assets in other industries or assets unrelated to real estate.
The healthcare industry is highly regulated, and changes in government regulation and reimbursement can have material adverse consequences on its participants, some of which may be unintended. The healthcare industry is also highly competitive, and our operators and managers may encounter increased competition for residents and patients, including with respect to the scope and quality of care and services provided, reputation and financial condition, physical appearance of the properties, price and location. Our tenants, operators and managers are large employers who compete for labor, making their results sensitive to changes in the labor market and/or wages and benefits offered to their employees. If our tenants, operators and managers are unable to successfully compete with other operators and managers by maintaining profitable occupancy and rate levels or controlling labor costs, their ability to meet their respective obligations to us may be materially adversely affected.non-U.S. jurisdictions. We cannot assure you that future changes in government regulationany new strategies, markets or businesses that we enter into will be successful or meet our expectations without encountering difficulties or that any such difficulties will not adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.

Our investments in co-investment vehicles, joint ventures and minority interests may subject us to risks and liabilities that we would not otherwise face.

We have and may continue to develop and acquire properties in joint ventures with other persons or entities when circumstances warrant the healthcare industry,use of these structures. In 2020, we formed the Ventas Investment Management Platform to consolidate our private capital management capabilities, which includes our Ventas Life Science and Healthcare Real Estate Fund, L.P. (the “Ventas Fund”), our joint venture with GIC and other partnerships with institutional capital vehicles, under a single platform. As of December 31, 2020, we had over $3 billion in assets under management in this platform. In the future, we may enter into additional co-investments, partnerships and joint ventures, either through the Ventas Investment Management Platform or otherwise. We also own minority investments in properties and unconsolidated operating entities which entitle us to rights and protections typical of minority investments, but that inherently involve a lesser degree of control over business operations.

There can be no assurance that we will be able to form new co-investment vehicles or attract third-party investment through additional investments or otherwise. Further, there can be no assurance that we are able to realize value from such investments.

These ventures involve risks not present with respect to our wholly owned properties, including the following:

We may be unable to take actions that are opposed by our seniors housing and healthcare operations, tenants and operators, nor canpartners under arrangements that require us to share decision-making authority over major decisions;
For ventures in which we be certain that our tenants, operators and managers will achieve and maintain occupancy and rate levels or labor costs levels that will enable them to satisfy their obligations to us. Any adverse changes in the regulation of the healthcare industry, or the competitiveness of our tenants, operators and managers, or costs of labor, could have a more pronounced effect on us than ifnoncontrolling interest, our partners may take actions that we had investments outside the seniors housing and healthcare industries.oppose;
Real estate investments are relatively illiquid, andIf our abilitypartners become bankrupt or otherwise fail to quickly sellfund their share of required capital contributions, we may choose to or exchange our properties in responsebe required to changes in economic or other conditions is limited. In the event we market any of our properties for sale, the value of those properties and our ability to sell at prices or on terms acceptable to us could be adversely affected by a downturn in the real estate industry or any economic weakness in the seniors housing and healthcare industries. In addition, transfers of healthcare propertiescontribute such capital;
We may be subject to regulatory approvalstransfer restrictions that areapply to our interest in the venture;
Our partners may have business interests or goals that conflict with our business interests and goals, including the timing, terms and strategies for any investments, and what levels of debt to incur or carry;
Our partners may have competing interests in our markets that could create conflicts of interest;
We could experience an impasse on certain decisions where we do not have sole decision-making authority, which could require us to expend additional resources on resolving such impasses or potential disputes;
Disagreements with our partners could result in litigation or arbitration;
Our partners might become insolvent, fail to fund their share of required capital contributions or fail to fulfill their obligations as a partner, which may require us to infuse our own capital into the venture on behalf of the partner despite other competing uses for transferssuch capital; and
We may suffer other losses as a result of other types of commercial properties. We cannot assure you thatactions taken by our partners with respect to our venture investments.

In some instances, our partners may have the right to cause us to sell our interest, or acquire our partner’s interest, at a time when we otherwise would not have initiated such a transaction. Our ability to acquire our partner’s interest will recognize the full value of any property thatbe limited
21


if we sell for liquiditydo not have sufficient cash, available borrowing capacity or other reasons,capital resources.This would require us to sell our interest in the venture when we would otherwise prefer to retain it.

Additionally, certain ventures require Ventas to assume the role of managing member with increased duties to the partnership. In the event of certain events or conflicts, our partners may have recourse against Ventas, including monetary penalties, the ability to force a sale or exit the venture, as well as other remedies.

Development, redevelopment and construction risks could affect our profitability.

We invest in various development and redevelopment projects. In deciding whether to make an investment in a project, we make certain assumptions regarding the expected future performance of the property. Our assumptions are subject to risks generally associated with development and redevelopment projects, including, among others, that:

Tenants may not lease space at the quantity or rental rate levels or on the schedule projected, including due to increased competition in the market and other market and economic conditions;
We may not complete the project on schedule or within budgeted amounts;
We may not be able to recognize rental revenue in some cases although cash rent is being paid and the inabilitylease has commenced;
We may encounter delays in obtaining or we may fail to respond quicklyobtain all necessary zoning, land use, building, occupancy, environmental and other governmental permits and authorizations, or underestimate the costs necessary to changesdevelop or redevelop the property to market standards;
We may be unable to obtain financing for the project on favorable terms or at all, including at the maturity of an applicable construction loan;
Construction or other delays may provide tenants or residents the right to terminate preconstruction leases or cause us to incur additional costs, including through rent abatement;
Volatility in the performanceprice of construction materials or labor may increase our project costs;
In the case of our investmentsMOB and R&I developments, hospitals, health systems, or university partners may maintain significant decision-making authority with respect to the development schedule;
Our builders or development managers may fail to perform or satisfy the expectations of our clients or prospective clients; and
We may incorrectly forecast risks associated with development in new geographic regions, including new markets where we may not have sufficient depth of market knowledge.

If any of the risks described above occur, our development and redevelopment projects may not yield anticipated returns, which could adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operationsoperations.

We face potential adverse consequences from the bankruptcy, insolvency or financial deterioration of our tenants, borrowers, managers and financial condition.other obligors.


Our operating assets expose usWe lease our properties to unaffiliated tenants or operate them through independent third-party managers. We are also a direct or indirect lender to various operational risks, liabilitiestenants and claimsmanagers. We have limited control over the success or failure of our tenants’, borrowers’ and managers’ businesses, and, at any time, a tenant, borrower or manager may experience a downturn in its business that could adversely affectweakens its financial condition. If that happens, the tenant, borrower or manager may fail to make its payments to us when due. Although our abilitylease, loan and management agreements give us the right to generate revenues or increase our costs and could have a Material Adverse Effect on us.
Our senior living operating assets and office assets expose us to various operational risks, liabilities and claims that could increase our costs or adversely affect our ability to generate revenues, thereby reducing our profitability. These operational risks include fluctuations in occupancy levels, the inability to achieve economic resident fees (including anticipated increases in those fees), increasesexercise certain remedies in the costevent of food, materials, energy, labor (as a resultdefault on the obligations owing to us, we may decide not to exercise those remedies if we believe that enforcement of unionization or otherwise) orour rights would be more detrimental to our business than seeking alternative approaches. We may also decide not to enforce other services, rent control regulations, national and regional economic conditions, the imposition of new or increased taxes, capital expenditure requirements, professional and general liability claims, and the availability and cost of professional and general liability insurance. Any one or a combination of these factors could result in operating deficiencies in our senior living operations or office operations reportable business segments, which could have a Material Adverse Effect on us.
Our ownership of properties outside the United States exposes us to different risks than those associated with our domestic properties.
Our current or future ownership of properties outside the United States subjects us to risks that may be different or greater than those we face with our domestic properties. These risks include, but are not limited to:
Challenges with respect to repatriation of foreign earnings and cash;
Foreign ownership restrictions with respect to operations in countries in which we own properties;
Regional or country-specific business cycles and economic instability;
Challenges of complying with a wide variety of foreign laws and regulations, including those relating to real estate, corporate governance, operations, taxes, employment and legal proceedings;
Differences in lending practices and the willingness of domestic or foreign lenders to provide financing; and
Failure to comply with applicable laws and regulations in the United States that affect foreign operations, including, but not limited to, the U.S. Foreign Corrupt Practices Act.
Increased construction and development in the markets in which our seniors housing communities and MOBs are located could adversely affect our future occupancy rates, operating margins and profitability.
Limited barriers to entry in the seniors housing and MOB industries could lead to the development of new seniors housing communities or MOBs that outpaces demand. Data published by the National Investment Center for Seniors Housing & Care has indicated deliveries of new seniors housing communities will remain at elevated levels in 2018, especially in certain geographic markets. If development outpaces demand for those assets in the markets in which our properties are located, those markets may become saturated and we could experience decreased occupancy, reduced operating margins and lower profitability, which could have a Material Adverse Effect on us.
We have now, and may have in the future, exposure to contingentcontractual protections, such as annual rent escalators, which could hinder our growth and profitability.
We derive a significant portion of our revenues from leasing properties pursuant to long-term triple-net leases that generally provide for fixed rental rates, subject to annual escalations. In certain cases, the annual escalations are contingent upon the achievement of specified revenue parameters or based on changes in CPI, with caps and floors. If, as a result of weak economic conditions or other factors, the properties subject to these leases domay not generate sufficient revenue to achieve the specified rent escalation parameters, which would adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations. This risk could be exacerbated by new laws and regulations enacted during the COVID-19 pandemic that limit our ability to enforce contractual escalators against tenants affected by the COVID-19 pandemic.

A downturn in any one of our tenants’, borrowers’ or CPI does not increase, our growth and profitabilitymanagers’ businesses could ultimately lead to its bankruptcy if it is unable to timely resolve the underlying causes, which may be hindered. If strong economic conditions resultlargely outside of its control. Bankruptcy and insolvency laws afford certain rights to a party that has filed for bankruptcy or reorganization that may render certain of our rights and remedies unenforceable, or, at the least, delay our ability to pursue such rights and remedies and realize any recoveries in significant increasesconnection therewith. For example, we cannot evict a tenant solely because of its bankruptcy filing. Additionally, a debtor-lessee may reject our lease in CPI, but the escalations under our leases are capped, our growtha bankruptcy proceeding, and profitabilityany claim we have for unpaid rent might not be paid in full. We also may be limited.required to fund certain expenses and obligations (e.g., real estate taxes, debt costs and maintenance expenses) to preserve the value of our properties, avoid the imposition of liens on our properties or transition our properties to a new tenant or manager.
22



Bankruptcy or insolvency proceedings may result in increased costs and significant management distraction. If we are unable to transition affected properties efficiently and effectively, such properties could experience prolonged operational disruption, leading to lower occupancy rates and further depressed revenues. Publicity about a tenant’s, borrowers’ or manager’s financial condition and insolvency proceedings may also negatively impact their and our reputations, which could result in decreased customer demand and revenues. Any or all of these risks could adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations. These risks would be magnified where we lease multiple properties to a single third party under a master lease, as a failure or default under a master lease would expose us to these risks across multiple properties.

We own certain properties subject to ground lease, air rights or other restrictive agreements that limit our uses of the properties, restrict our ability to sell or otherwise transfer the properties and expose us to loss of the properties if such agreements are breached by us or terminated.

Our investments in MOBs, R&I buildings and facilities as well as other properties may be made through leasehold interests in the land on which the buildings are located, leases of air rights for the space above the land on which the buildings are located, or other similar restrictive arrangements. Many of these ground lease, air rights and other restrictive agreements impose significant limitations on our uses of the subject properties, restrict our ability to sell or otherwise transfer our interests in the properties or restrict the leasing of the properties. These restrictions may limit our ability to timely sell or exchange the properties, impair the properties’ value or negatively impact our ability to find suitable tenants for the properties. In addition, we could lose our interests in the subject properties if the ground lease, air rights or other restrictive agreements are breached by us or terminated.


WeEnvironmental, Economic and Market Risks

Increased construction and development in the markets in which our properties are located could adversely affect our future occupancy rates, operating margins and profitability.

The oversupply of healthcare real estate could adversely affect our business. In many jurisdictions, limited barriers to entry could lead to the development of new properties that outpaces demand across our various asset classes. If existing supply and development collectively outpaces demand for those assets in the markets in which our properties are located, those markets may be unable to successfully foreclose on the collateral securing our loansbecome saturated and other investments,we could experience decreased occupancy, reduced operating margins and even if we are successful in our foreclosure efforts, we may be unable to successfully sell any acquired equity interests or reposition any acquired properties,lower profitability, which could adversely affect our ability to recover our investments.
If a borrower defaults under mortgage or other secured loans for which we are the lender, we may attempt to foreclose on the collateral securing those loans, including by acquiring any pledged equity interests or acquiring title to the subject properties, to protect our investment. In response, the defaulting borrower may contest our enforcement of foreclosure or other available remedies, seek bankruptcy protection against our exercise of enforcement or other available remedies, or bring claims against us for lender liability. If a defaulting borrower seeks bankruptcy protection, the automatic stay provisions of the U.S. Bankruptcy Code would preclude us from enforcing foreclosure or other available remedies against the borrower unless relief is first obtained from the court with jurisdiction over the bankruptcy case. In addition, we may be subject to intercreditor or tri-party agreements that delay, impact, govern or limit our ability to foreclose on a lien securing a loan or otherwise delay or limit our pursuit of our rights and remedies. Any such delay or limit on our ability to pursue our rights or remedies could have a Material Adverse Effect on us.
Even if we successfully foreclose on the collateral securing our mortgage loans and other investments, costs related to enforcement of our remedies, high loan-to-value ratios or declines in the value of the collateral could prevent us from realizing the full amount of our secured loans, and we could be required to record a valuation allowance for such losses. Moreover, the collateral may include equity interests that we are unable to sell due to securities law restrictions or otherwise, or properties that we are unable to reposition with new tenants or operators on a timely basis, if at all, or without making improvements or repairs. Any delay or costs incurred in selling or repositioning acquired collateral could adversely affect our ability to recover our investments.
Some of our loan investments are subordinated to loans held by third parties.
Our mezzanine loan investments are subordinated to senior secured loans held by other investors that encumber the same real estate. If a senior secured loan is foreclosed, that foreclosure would extinguish our rights in the collateral for our mezzanine loan. In order to protect our economic interest in that collateral, we would need to be prepared, on an expedited basis, to advance funds to the senior lenders in order to cure defaults under the senior secured loans and prevent such a foreclosure. If a senior secured loan has matured or has been accelerated, then in order to protect our economic interest in the collateral, we would need to be prepared, on an expedited basis, to purchase or pay off that senior secured loan, which could require an infusion of fresh capital as large or larger than our initial investment. Our ability to sell or syndicate a mezzanine loan could be limited by transfer restrictions in the intercreditor agreement with the senior secured lenders. Our ability to negotiate modifications to the mezzanine loan documents with our borrowers could be limited by restrictions on modifications in the intercreditor agreement. Since mezzanine loans are typically secured by pledges of equity rather than direct liens on real estate, our mezzanine loan investments are more vulnerable than our mortgage loan investments to losses caused by competing creditor claims, unauthorized transfers, or bankruptcies.
Our tenants, operators and managers may be adversely affected by healthcare regulation and enforcement.
Regulation of the healthcare industry generally has intensified over time both in the number and type of regulations and in the efforts to enforce those regulations. This is particularly true for large for-profit, multi-facility providers like Atria, Sunrise, Brookdale Senior Living, Ardent and Kindred. Federal, state and local laws and regulations affecting the healthcare industry include those relating to, among other things, licensure, conduct of operations, ownership of facilities, addition of facilities and equipment, allowable costs, services, prices for services, qualified beneficiaries, quality of care, patient rights, fraudulent or abusive behavior, financial and other arrangements that may be entered into by healthcare providers and the research, development, clinical testing, manufacture and marketing of life science products. In addition, changes in enforcement policies by federal and state governments have resulted in an increase in the number of inspections, citations of regulatory deficiencies and other regulatory sanctions, including terminations from the Medicare and Medicaid programs, bars on Medicare and Medicaid payments for new admissions, civil monetary penalties and even criminal penalties. See “Governmental Regulation—Healthcare Regulation” included in Item 1 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K. We are unable to predict the scope of future federal, state and local regulations and legislation, including the Medicare and Medicaid statutes and regulations, or the intensity of enforcement efforts with respect to such regulations and legislation, and any changes in the regulatory framework could have a material adverse effect on our tenants, operators and managers, which, in turn, could have a Material Adverse Effect on us.
If our tenants, operators and managers fail to comply with the extensive laws, regulations and other requirements applicable to their businesses and the operation of our properties, they could become ineligible to receive reimbursement from governmental and private third-party payor programs, face bans on admissions of new patients or residents, suffer civil or criminal penalties or be required to make significant changes to their operations. Our tenants, operators and managers also

could face increased costs related to changes in healthcare regulation, such as the possible repeal of the ACA by the current presidential administration and Republican-controlled Congress and a shift toward less comprehensive health coverage, or be forced to expend considerable resources in responding to an investigation or other enforcement action under applicable laws or regulations. In such event, the results of operations and financial condition of our tenants, operators and managers and the results of operations of our properties operated or managed by those entities could be adversely affected, which, in turn, could have a Material Adverse Effect on us.
Changes in the reimbursement rates or methods of payment from third-party payors, including insurance companies and the Medicare and Medicaid programs, could have a material adverse effect on certain of our tenants and operators and on us.
Certain of our tenants and operators rely on reimbursement from third-party payors, including the Medicare (both traditional Medicare and "managed" Medicare/Medicare Advantage) and Medicaid programs, for substantially all of their revenues. Federal and state legislators and regulators have adopted or proposed various cost-containment measures that would limit payments to healthcare providers, and budget crises and financial shortfalls have caused states to implement or consider Medicaid rate freezes or cuts. See “Governmental Regulation—Healthcare Regulation” included in Item 1 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K. Private third-party payors also have continued their efforts to control healthcare costs. In addition, coverage expansions via the ACA through Medicaid expansion and health insurance exchanges may be scaled back as the current presidential administration and some members of Congress lead efforts to repeal and replace the ACA. We cannot assure you that our tenants and operators who currently depend on governmental or private payor reimbursement will be adequately reimbursed for the services they provide. Significant limits by governmental and private third-party payors on the scope of services reimbursed or on reimbursement rates and fees, whether from legislation, administrative actions or private payor efforts, could have a material adverse effect on the liquidity,business, financial condition and results of operationsoperations.

General economic conditions and other events or occurrences that affect areas in which our properties are geographically concentrated may impact financial results.

We are exposed to general economic conditions, local, regional, national and international economic conditions and other events and occurrences that affect the markets in which we own properties. Our operating performance is impacted by the economic conditions of certainthe specific markets in which we have concentrations of properties and could be adversely affected if conditions become less favorable in any such markets. For example, a shortage of skilled workers in a particular region, including nurses or other trained personnel, may force our third-party managers to enhance their pay and benefits package to compete effectively for such personnel, but such managers may not be able to offset these added costs by increasing the rates charged to residents, which may result in less revenue to our business.

A substantial portion of our tenantsvalue is derived from properties in California, New York, Texas, Pennsylvania and operators, which could affect adversely their ability to comply with the terms of our leasesIllinois, and haveas a Material Adverse Effect on us.
The healthcare industry trend away from a traditional fee for service reimbursement model towards value-based payment approaches may negatively impact certain of our tenants’ revenues and profitability
Certain of our tenants, specifically those providers in the post-acute and general acute care hospital space,result, we are subject to the broad trendincreased exposure to adverse conditions affecting these regions, including downturns in the healthcare industry toward value-based purchasinglocal economies or changes in local real estate conditions, changing demographics, increased construction and competition or decreased demand for our properties, regional climate events and changes in state-specific legislation, which could adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of healthcare services. These value-based purchasing programs include both public reporting of quality dataoperations.

To the extent that we or our tenants, borrowers and preventable adverse events tied to the quality and efficiency of care provided by facilities. Medicare and Medicaid require healthcare facilities, including hospitals and skilled nursing facilities, to report certain quality data to receive full reimbursement updates. In addition Medicare does not reimburse for care related to certain preventable adverse events (also called “never events”). Many large commercial payors currently require healthcare facilities to report quality data, and several commercial payors do not reimburse hospitals for certain preventable adverse events.
During the Obama administration, HHS focused on tying Medicare payments to quality or value through alternative payment models, which generally aim to make providers attentive to the total costs of treatment. Examples of alternative payment models include bundled-payment arrangements. It is unclear whether such models will successfully coordinate care and reduce costs or whether they will decrease reimbursement. The value-based purchasing trend is not limited to the public sector. Several of the nation’s largest commercial payors have also expressed an intent to increase reliance on value-based reimbursement arrangements. Further, many large commercial payors require hospitals to report quality data, and several commercial payors do not reimburse hospitals for certain preventable adverse events.
While the current presidential administration’s and some members of Congress’s desire to repeal the ACA creates unpredictability, we expect value-based purchasing programs, including programs that condition reimbursement on patient outcome measures, to become more common and to involve a higher percentage of reimbursement amounts. Wemanagers are unable at this time to predict how this trend will affectnavigate successfully the revenuestrends impacting our or their businesses and profitability of those of ourthe industries in which we or they operate, we may be adversely affected.

Our tenants, who are providers ofborrowers and managers include senior housing operators, hospitals, post-acute facilities and other healthcare services; however, if this trend significantlysystems, medical offices and adversely affects their profitability, it could in turn negatively affect their abilitylife sciences and willingness to comply with the terms of their leases with us and or renew those leases upon expiration, which could have a Material Adverse Effect on us.

If controls imposed on certain of our tenants who provide healthcare servicestechnology companies that are reimbursed by Medicare, Medicaidsubject to a complex set of trends affecting their businesses and other third-party payorsthe industries in which they operate. If we or they are unable to reduce admissions and length of stay affect inpatient volumes atsuccessfully navigate such trends, our healthcare facilities, thebusiness, financial condition orand results of operations of those tenantsoperators could be adversely affected.


Controls
23


There have been, and could be additional, advances or changes in technology, payment models, healthcare delivery models, regulation or consumer behavior or perception that could over time reduce demand for on-site activities provided at our properties. For example, the effects of shelter-in-place and stay-at-home orders, including remote work arrangements for an extended period of time, could broadly impact market demand for real estate and could cause long term structural changes in the marketplace. If our tenants and managers are not able to adapt to long-term changes in demand, their financial condition could be materially impacted, and our business could suffer. In addition, our tenants, borrowers and managers face an increasingly competitive labor market, which has been compounded by the COVID-19 pandemic. An inability to attract and retain trained personnel could negatively impact the ability of our tenants, borrowers and managers to meet their obligations to us. A shortage of care givers or other trained personnel, union activities, minimum wage laws, or general inflationary pressures on wages may force tenants, borrowers and managers to enhance pay and benefits packages to compete effectively for skilled personnel, or to use more expensive contract personnel, but they may be unable to offset these added costs by increasing the rates charged to residents.

Additionally, controls imposed by Medicare, Medicaid and commercial third-party payors designed to reduce admissions and lengths of stay, commonly referred to as “utilization reviews,” have affected and are expected to continue to affect certain of

our healthcare facilities,tenants, specifically our acute care hospitals and post-acute facilities. Utilization review entailsTelehealth and increased use of home healthcare may also reduce demand for activities at our properties. The U.S. Congress and certain state legislatures have introduced and passed a number of proposals and legislation designed to make major changes in the reviewhealthcare system, including changes that directly or indirectly affect reimbursement. Several of these laws, including the admissionAffordable Care Act, have promoted shifting from traditional fee-for-service reimbursement models to alternative payment models that tie reimbursement to quality and coursecost of treatmentcare, such as accountable care organizations and bundled payments. See “Government Regulation—United States Healthcare Regulation, Licensing and Enforcement” included in Part I, Item 1 of a patient by managed care plans. Inpatient utilization, average lengthsthis Annual Report. These and other trends could significantly and adversely affect the profitability of stay and occupancy rates continue to be negatively affected by payor-required preadmission authorization and utilization review and by payor pressures to maximize outpatient and alternative healthcare delivery services for less acutely ill patients. Efforts to impose more stringent cost controls and reductions are expected to continue,these tenants, which could negatively impact the financial condition of our tenants who provide healthcare services in our hospitals and post-acute facilities. If so, this could adversely affect these tenants’their ability andto make rental payments to us or their willingness to comply with the terms ofrenew their leases with us and or renew those leases upon expiration, which could have a Material Adverse Effect on us.

The implementation of new patient criteria for LTACs will change the basis upon which certain of our tenantsterms that are reimbursed by Medicare, which could adversely affect those tenants’ revenues and profitability.
As part of the Pathway for SGR Reform Act of 2013 enacted on December 26, 2013, Congress adopted various legislative changes impacting LTACs. These legislative changes create new Medicare criteria and payment rules for LTACs, and could have a material adverse impact on the revenues and profitability of the tenants of our LTACs. This material adverse impact could, in turn, negatively affect those tenants’ ability and willingnessas favorable to comply with the terms of their leases with us, or renew those leases upon expiration, which could have a Material Adverse Effect on us.at all.


The hospitals on or near whosethe campuses where our MOBs are located and their affiliated health systems could fail to remain competitive or financially viable, which could adversely impact their ability to attract physicians and physician groups to our MOBs.MOBs and our other properties that serve the healthcare industry.

Our MOB operationsMOBs and other properties that serve the healthcare industry depend on the competitiveness and financial viability of the hospitals on or near whosethe campuses where our MOBsproperties are located and their ability to attract physicians and other healthcare-related clients to our MOBs.properties. The viability of these hospitals, in turn, depends on factors such as the quality and mix of healthcare services provided, competition for patients, physicians and physician groups, demographic trends in the surrounding community, market position and growth potential as well as the ability of the affiliated health systems to provide economies of scale and access to capital. If a hospital on or near whosethe campus where one of our MOBsproperties is located fails or becomes unable to meet its financial obligations, and if an affiliated health system is unable to support that hospital, thethat hospital may be unable to compete successfully or could be forced to close or relocate, which could adversely impact its ability to attract physicians and other healthcare-related clients. Because we rely on proximity to and affiliations with hospitals to create leasing demand in our MOBs,properties, a hospital’s inability to remain competitive or financially viable, or to attract physicians and physician groups, could materially adversely affect our MOB operations and have a Material Adverse Effect on us.
Our development and redevelopment projects, including projects undertaken through our joint ventures, may not yield anticipated returns.
We consider and, when appropriate, invest in various development and redevelopment projects. In deciding whether to make an investment in a particular project, we make certain assumptions regarding the expected future performance of the property. Our assumptions are subject to risks generally associated with development and redevelopment projects, including, among others, that:
We may be unable to obtain financing for the project on favorable terms or at all;
We may not complete the project on schedule or within budgeted amounts;
We may encounter delays in obtaining or fail to obtain all necessary zoning, land use, building, occupancy, environmental and other governmental permits and authorizations, or underestimate the costs necessary to develop or redevelop the property to market standards;
Construction or other delays may provide tenants or residents the right to terminate preconstruction leases or cause us to incur additional costs;
Volatility in the price of construction materials or labor may increase our project costs;
In the case of our MOB developments, hospitals or health systems may maintain significant decision-making authority with respect to the development schedule;
Our builders may fail to perform or satisfy the expectations of our clients or prospective clients;
We may incorrectly forecast risks associated with development in new geographic regions;
Tenants may not lease space at the quantity or rental rate levels or on the schedule projected;
Demand for our project may decrease prior to completion, due to competition from other developments; and

Lease rates and rents at newly developed or redeveloped properties may fluctuate based on factors beyond our control, including market and economic conditions.
If any of the risks described above occur, our development and redevelopment projects, including projects undertaken through our joint ventures, may not yield anticipated returns, which could have a Material Adverse Effect on us.
Our investments in joint ventures and unconsolidated entities could be adversely affected by our lack of sole decision-making authority, our reliance on our joint venture partners’ financial condition, any disputes that may arise between us and our joint venture partners, and our exposure to potential losses from the actions of our joint venture partners.
As of December 31, 2017, we owned 48 MOBs, 11 life science and innovation centers, nine seniors housing communities and one IRF through consolidated joint ventures, and we had 25% ownership interests in 17 seniors housing communities, 13 SNFs and one MOB through investments in unconsolidated entities. In addition, we had a 34% ownership interest in Atria and a 9.9% interest in Ardent as of December 31, 2017. These joint ventures and unconsolidated entities involve risks not present with respect to our wholly owned properties, including the following:
We may be unable to take actions that are opposed by our joint venture partners under arrangements that require us to share decision-making authority over major decisions affecting the ownership or operation of the joint venture and any property owned by the joint venture, such as the sale or financing of the property or the making of additional capital contributions for the benefit of the property;
For joint ventures in which we have a noncontrolling interest, our joint venture partners may take actions that we oppose;
Our ability to sell or transfer our interest in a joint venture to a third party may be restricted if we fail to obtain the prior consent of our joint venture partners;
Our joint venture partners may become bankrupt or fail to fund their share of required capital contributions, which could delay construction or development of a property or increase ourbusiness, financial commitment to the joint venture;
Our joint venture partners may have business interests or goals with respect to a property that conflict with our business interests and goals, including with respect to the timing, terms and strategies for investment, which could increase the likelihood of disputes regarding the ownership, management or disposition of the property;
Disagreements with our joint venture partners could result in litigation or arbitration that increases our expenses, distracts our officers and directors, and disrupts the day-to-day operations of the property, including by delaying important decisions until the dispute is resolved; and
We may suffer losses as a result of actions taken by our joint venture partners with respect to our joint venture investments.
Events that adversely affect the ability of seniors and their families to afford daily resident fees at our seniors housing communities could cause our occupancy rates, resident fee revenuescondition and results of operations to decline.operations.
Assisted and independent living services generally are not reimbursable under government reimbursement programs, such as Medicare and Medicaid. A large majority of the resident fee revenues generated by our senior living operations, therefore, are derived from private pay sources consisting of the income or assets of residents or their family members. In light of the significant expense associated with building new properties and staffing and other costs of providing services, typically only seniors with income or assets that meet or exceed the comparable region median can afford the daily resident and care fees at our seniors housing communities, and a weak economy, depressed housing market or changes in demographics could adversely affect their continued ability to do so. If the managers of our seniors housing communities are unable to attract and retain seniors that have sufficient income, assets or other resources to pay the fees associated with assisted and independent living services, the occupancy rates, resident fee revenues and results of operations of our senior living operations could decline, which, in turn, could have a Material Adverse Effect on us.
Our tenants in the life science, industryR&I tenants face highunique levels of regulation, expense and uncertainty.
Life
Our life science, R&I tenants develop and sell products and services in an industry that is characterized by rapid and significant changes, evolving industry standards and uncertainty over the implementation of new healthcare reform legislation, which may cause them to lose competitive positions and adversely affect their operation. These tenants, particularly those involved in developing and marketing pharmaceutical products, are subject to certain unique risks, including the following:
Some of our tenants require significant outlays of funds for the research and development, and clinical testing, manufacture and commercialization of their products and technologies. Thetechnologies, as well as to fund their obligations, including rent payments due to us, and our tenants’ ability to raise capital depends on the viability of their products and technologies, their financial and operating condition and outlook, and the overall financial, banking and economic environment in recent years has significantly impacted the ability of these companies to access the capital markets and venture capital funding. In addition, state and federal government and university budgets have been negatively impacted by the recent economic environment and, as a result certain

programs, including grants related to biotechnology research and development, may be at risk of being eliminated or cut back significantly.environment. If private investors, the federal government, universities, public markets or other sources of funding are unavailable to support such development, including as a tenant’sresult of general economic conditions, adverse market conditions or government shutdowns that limit our tenants’ ability to raise capital, such as those resulting from the current COVID-19 pandemic, a tenant may not be able to pay rent on the terms agreed or at all, its business may fail.fail and in certain cases, its lease may automatically terminate without any further obligation to pay us rent.


TheAdditionally, the research and development, clinical testing, manufacture and marketing of some of our tenants’ products require federal, state and foreign regulatory approvals. The approval process is typically long, expensive and uncertain. Even if our tenants have sufficient funds to seek approvals, one or all of their products may fail to obtain the
24


required regulatory approvals on a timely basis or at all. Furthermore, our tenants may only have a small number of products under development. If one product fails to receive the required approvals at any stage of development, it could significantly adversely affect oursuch tenant’s entire business and its ability to pay rent.

Our tenants depend on the commercial success of certain products, and they may be unable to manufacture their products successfully or economically; may be unable to adapt to the rapid technological advances in the industry and to adequately protect their intellectual property under patent, copyright or trade secret laws. Failure to do so could jeopardize their ability to profit from their efforts and to protect their products from competition.

Collaborative relationships with other life science entitieslaws or may face expiration of patent protection; may be crucial to the development, manufacturing, distributionfaced with later discovery of safety concerns; may face competition from new products; or marketingmay not receive acceptance of our tenants’their products. If these other entities fail to fulfill their obligations under these collaborative arrangements, our tenants’ businesses will suffer.

Legislation to reform the U.S. healthcare system, including regulations and legislation relating to the ACA, may include government intervention in product pricing and other changes that adversely affect reimbursement for our tenants’ marketable products. In addition, sales of many of our tenants’ marketable products are dependent, in large part, on the availability and extent of reimbursement from government health administration authorities, private health insurers and other organizations. Changes in government regulations, price controls or third-party payors’ reimbursement policies may reduce reimbursement for our tenants’ marketable products and adversely impact our tenants’ businesses.


We cannot assure you that any of our tenants in the life science, industryR&I tenants will be successful in their businesses. If our tenants’ businesses are adversely affected, theyAny tenant that is unable to avoid, or sufficiently mitigate, the risks described above may have difficulty making rental payments or satisfying its other lease obligations to us or may have difficulty maintaining the value of our investment, which could materially adversely affect our business, results of operations and financial condition.
The amount and scope of insurance coverage provided by our policies and policies maintained by our tenants, operators and managers may not adequately insure against losses.
We maintain or require in our lease, management and other agreements that our tenants, operators and managers maintain all applicable lines of insurance on our properties and their operations. Although we regularly review the amount and scope of insurance provided by our policies and required to be maintained by our tenants, operators and managers and believe the coverage provided to be customary for similarly situated companies in our industry, we cannot assure you that we or our tenants, operators and managers will continue to be able to maintain adequate levels of insurance. We also cannot assure you that we or our tenants, operators and managers will maintain the required coverages, that we will continue to require the same levels of insurance under our lease, management and other agreements, that such insurance will be available at a reasonable cost in the future or that the policies maintained will fully cover all losses on our properties upon the occurrence of a catastrophic event, nor can we make any guaranty as to the future financial viability of the insurers that underwrite our policies and the policies maintained by our tenants, operators and managers.
For various reasons, including to reduce and manage costs, many healthcare companies utilize different organizational and corporate structures coupled with self-insurance trusts or captive programs that may provide less insurance coverage than a traditional insurance policy. Companies that insure any part of their general and professional liability risks through their own captive limited purpose entities generally estimate the future cost of general and professional liability through actuarial studies that rely primarily on historical data. However, due to the rise in the number and severity of professional claims against healthcare providers, these actuarial studies may underestimate the future cost of claims, and reserves for future claims may not be adequate to cover the actual cost of those claims. As a result, the tenants and operators of our properties who self-insure could incur large funded and unfunded general and professional liability expenses, which could materially adversely affect their liquidity, financial condition and results of operationsoperations.

Merger, acquisition and investment activity in turn, their ability to satisfy their obligations to us. If weour industries resulting in a change of control of, or the managersa competitor’s investment in, one or more of our senior living operations decidetenants, borrowers or managers could adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.

The seniors housing and healthcare industries have experienced and may continue to implementexperience consolidation, including among owners of real estate, tenants and care providers. In connection with any change of control of a captivetenant, borrower or self-insurance program,manager, such tenant’s, borrower’s or manager’s strategy, financial condition, management team or real estate needs may change, any large fundedof which could adversely affect our relationship with such party and unfunded generalour revenues and professional liability expenses incurredresults of operations. In addition, a competitor’s investment in one of our tenants, borrowers or managers could enable our competitor to directly or indirectly influence that tenant’s, borrower’s or manager’s business and strategy in a manner that impairs our relationship with the tenant, borrower or manager or is otherwise adverse to our interests. Depending on our contractual agreements and the specific facts and circumstances, we may not have the right to consent to a Material Adverse Effect on us.competitor’s investment in, a change of control of, or other transactions impacting a tenant, borrower or manager.
Should an uninsured
Damage from catastrophic or extreme weather and other natural events and the physical effects of climate change could result in losses to the Company.

Certain of our properties are in areas particularly susceptible to revenue loss, cost increase or damage caused by catastrophic or extreme weather and other natural events, including fires, snow or ice storms, windstorms or hurricanes, earthquakes, flooding or other severe weather. These adverse weather and natural events could cause substantial damages or losses to our properties which could exceed our or our tenants’, borrowers’ or managers’ property insurance coverage. Operationally, such events could cause a major power outage, leading to a disruption of our systems and operations. In the event of a loss in excess of insured limits, occur, we could incur substantial liability or lose all or a portion of theour capital we have invested in athe affected property, as well as the anticipated future revenuesrevenue from thethat property. Following the occurrence ofAny such an event, we might nevertheless remain obligated for any mortgage debt or other financial obligations

related to the property. We cannot assure you that material uninsured losses, or losses in excess of insurance proceeds, will not occur in the future.
Significant legal actions or regulatory proceedingsloss could subject us or our tenants, operatorsmaterially and managers to increased operating costs and substantial uninsured liabilities, which could materially adversely affect our or their liquidity,business, financial condition and results of operations. Climate change may also have indirect effects on our business by increasing the cost of (or making unavailable) property insurance on terms we find acceptable.
From time to time,
To the extent that significant changes in the climate occur in areas where our properties are located, we may experience extreme weather and changes in precipitation and temperature, all of which may result in physical damage to or a decrease in demand for properties located in these areas or affected by these conditions. Should the impact of climate change be subject to claims brought against usmaterial in lawsuits and other legal or regulatory proceedings arising outnature, including destruction of our alleged actionsproperties, or the alleged actionsoccur for lengthy periods of time, our tenants, operators and managers for which such tenants, operators and managers may have agreed to indemnify, defend and hold us harmless. An unfavorable resolution of any such litigation or proceeding could materially adversely affect our or their liquidity,business, financial condition andor results of operations and have a Material Adverse Effect on us.may be adversely affected.

In certain cases, we and our tenants, operators and managers may be subject to professional liability claims brought by plaintiffs’ attorneys seeking significant punitive damages and attorneys’ fees. Due to the historically high frequency and severity of professional liability claims against seniors housing and healthcare providers, the availability of professional liability insurance has decreased and the premiums on such insurance coverage remain costly. As a result, insurance protection against such claims may not be sufficient to cover all claims against us or our tenants, operators or managers, and may not be available at a reasonable cost. If we or our tenants, operators and managers are unable to maintain adequate insurance coverage or are required to pay punitive damages, we or they may be exposed to substantial liabilities.
The occurrence of cyber incidents could disrupt our operations, resultaddition, changes in the loss of confidential information and/or damage our business relationships and reputation.
As our reliance on technology has increased, our business is subject to greater risk from cyber incidents, including attempts to gain unauthorized access to our or our managers’ systems to disrupt operations, corrupt data or steal confidential information, and other electronic security breaches.  While we and our managers have implemented measures to help mitigate these threats, such measures cannot guarantee that we will be successful in preventing a cyber incident.  The occurrence of a cyber incident could disrupt our operations, or the operations of our managers, compromise the confidential information of our employees or the residents in our seniors housing communities, and/or damage our business relationships and reputation.
Our operators may be sued under a federal whistleblower statute.
Our operators who engage in business with the federal government may be sued under a federal whistleblower statute designed to combat fraud and abuse in the healthcare industry. See “Governmental Regulation—Healthcare Regulation” included in Item 1 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K. These lawsuits can involve significant monetary damages and award bounties to private plaintiffs who successfully bring these suits. If any of these lawsuits were brought against our operators, such suits combined with increased operating costs and substantial uninsured liabilities could have a material adverse effect on our operators’ liquidity, financial condition and results of operations and on their ability to satisfy their obligations under our leases, which, in turn, could have a Material Adverse Effect on us.
We could incur substantial liabilities and costs if any of our properties are found to be contaminated with hazardous substances or we become involved in any environmental disputes.
Under federal and state environmental lawslegislation and regulations, a current or former owner of real property may be liable for costs relatedregulation on climate change could result in increased capital expenditures to improve the investigation, removal and remediation of hazardous or toxic substances or petroleum that are released from or are present at or under, or that are disposed of in connection with such property. Owners of real property may also face other environmental liabilities, including government fines and penalties imposed by regulatory authorities and damages for injuries to persons, property or natural resources. Environmental laws and regulations often impose liability without regard to whether the owner was aware of, or was responsible for, the presence, release or disposal of hazardous or toxic substances or petroleum. In certain circumstances, environmental liability may result from the activities of a current or former operator of the property. Although we generally have indemnification rights against the current operatorsenergy efficiency of our existing properties for contamination caused by them, such indemnification may not adequately cover all environmental costs. See “Governmental Regulation—Environmental Regulation” included in Item 1 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
Our success depends, in part,and could also require us to spend more on our ability to attract and retain talented employees, and the loss of any one of our key personnel could adversely impact our business.new development properties without a corresponding increase in revenue.
The success of our business depends, in part, on the leadership and performance of our executive management team and key employees, and our ability to attract, retain and motivate talented employees could significantly impact our future performance. Competition for these individuals is intense, and we cannot assure you that we will retain our key officers and

employees or that we will be able to attract and retain other highly qualified individuals in the future. Losing any one or more of these persons could have a Material Adverse Effect on us.
Failure to maintain effective internal controls could harm our business, results of operations and financial condition.
Pursuant to the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, we are required to provide a report by management on internal control over financial reporting, including management’s assessment of the effectiveness of such control. Because of its inherent limitations, including the possibility of human error, the circumvention or overriding of controls, or fraud, effective internal controls over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatement and can provide only reasonable assurance with respect to the preparation and fair presentation of financial statements. If we fail to maintain the adequacy of our internal controls over financial reporting and our operating internal controls, including any failure to implement required new or improved controls as a result of changes to our business or otherwise, or if we experience difficulties in their implementation, our business, results of operations and financial condition could be materially adversely harmed and we could fail to meet our reporting obligations.
Economic and other conditions that negatively affect geographic locations to which a greater percentage of our NOI is attributed could adversely affect our financial results.
For the year ended December 31, 2017, approximately 35.6% of our total NOI was derived from properties located in California (13.9%), Texas (6.4%), New York (5.7%), Illinois (5.1%) and Florida (4.5%). As a result, we are subject to increased exposure to adverse conditions affecting these regions, including downturns in the local economies or changes in local real estate conditions, increased construction and competition or decreased demand for our properties, regional climate events and changes in state-specific legislation, which could adversely affect our business and results of operations.
We may be adversely affected by fluctuations in currency exchange rates.
Our ownership of properties in Canada and the United Kingdom currently subjects us to fluctuations in the exchange rates between U.S. dollars and Canadian dollars or the British pound, which may, from time to time, impact our financial condition and results of operations. If we continue to expand our international presence through investments in, or acquisitions or development of, seniors housing or healthcare assets outside the United States, Canada or the United Kingdom, we may transact business in other foreign currencies. Although we may pursue hedging alternatives, including borrowing in local currencies, to protect against foreign currency fluctuations, we cannot assure you that such fluctuations will not have a Material Adverse Effect on us.
Risks Arising from Our Capital Structure Risks

We may become more leveraged.

As of December 31, 2017,2020, we had approximately $11.3$11.9 billion of outstanding indebtedness. The instruments governing our existing indebtedness permit us to incur substantial additional debt, including secured debt, and we may satisfy our capital and liquidity needs through additional borrowings. A high level of indebtedness would require us to dedicate a substantial portion of our cash flow from operations to the payment of debt service, thereby reducing the funds available to
25


implement our business strategy and make distributions to stockholders. A high level of indebtedness on an absolute basis or as a ratio to our cash flow could also have the following consequences:

Potential limits on our ability to adjust rapidly to changing market conditions and vulnerability in the event of a downturn in general economic conditions or in the real estate or healthcare industries;

Potential impairment of our ability to obtain additional financing to execute on our business strategy; and

Potential downgrade in the rating of our debt securities by one or more rating agencies, which could have the effect of, among other things, limiting our access to capital and increasing our cost of borrowing.

In addition, from time to time, we mortgage certain of our properties to secure payment of indebtedness. If we are unable to meet our mortgage payments, then the encumbered properties could be foreclosed upon or transferred to the mortgagee with a resulting loss of income and asset value.

We are highly dependent on access to the capital markets. Limitations on our ability to access capital could have an adverse effect on us, including our ability to make required payments on our debt obligations, make distributions to our stockholders or make future investments necessary to implement our business strategy.

We cannot assure you that we will be able to raise the capital necessary to meet our debt service obligations, make distributions to our stockholders or make future investments necessary to implement our business strategy, if our cash flow from operations is insufficient to satisfy these needs, and the failure to do so could adversely affect our business. We cannot assure you that conditions in the capital markets will not deteriorate or that our access to capital and other sources of funding will not become constrained, which could adversely affect the availability and terms of future borrowings, renewals or refinancings and our results of operations and financial condition. If we cannot access capital at an acceptable cost or at all, we may be required to liquidate one or more investments in properties at times that may not permit us to maximize the return on those investments or that could result in adverse tax consequences to us.

As a public company, our access to debt and equity capital depends, in part, on the trading prices of our senior notes and common stock, which, in turn, depend upon market conditions that change from time to time, such as the market’s perception of our financial condition, our growth potential and our current and expected future earnings and cash distributions. Our failure to meet the market’s expectation regarding future earnings and cash distributions or a significant downgrade in the ratings assigned to our long-term debt could impact our ability to access capital or increase our borrowing costs.

The COVID-19 pandemic has also caused, and is likely to continue to cause, severe economic, market and other disruptions worldwide. We cannot assure you that conditions in the bank lending, capital and other financial markets will not continue to deteriorate as a result of the pandemic, or that our access to capital and other sources of funding will not become constrained, which could adversely affect the availability and terms of future borrowings, renewals or refinancings. The continuance of decreased revenue and NOI as a result of the COVID-19 pandemic could lead to downgrades of our long-term credit rating. Such future downgrades could increase our borrowing costs, which would make it more difficult or expensive to obtain additional financing or refinance existing obligations and commitments. In addition, the deterioration of global economic conditions as a result of the pandemic has decreased occupancy levels and pricing across our portfolio as senior residents and tenants reduce or defer their spending.

We also rely on the financial institutions that are parties to our revolving credit facilities. If these institutions become capital constrained, tighten their lending standards or become insolvent or if they experience excessive volumes of borrowing requests from other borrowers within a short period of time, they may be unable or unwilling to honor their funding commitments to us, which would adversely affect our ability to draw on our revolving credit facilities and, over time, could negatively impact our ability to consummate acquisitions, repay indebtedness as it matures, fund capital expenditures or make distributions to our stockholders.

We may be adversely affected by fluctuations in currency exchange rates.

Our ownership of properties in Canada and the United Kingdom currently subjects us to fluctuations in the exchange rates between U.S. dollars and Canadian dollars or the British pound, which may, from time to time, impact our financial condition and results of operations. If we continue to expand our international presence through investments in, or acquisitions or development of, senior housing or healthcare assets outside the United States, Canada or the United Kingdom, we may transact business in other foreign currencies. Although we may pursue hedging alternatives, including borrowing in local
26


currencies, to protect against foreign currency fluctuations, we cannot assure you that such fluctuations will not adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.

We are exposed to increases in interest rates, which could reduce our profitability and adversely impact our ability to refinance existing debt, sell assets or engage in acquisition, investment, development and redevelopment activity, and our decision to hedge against interest rate risk might not be effective.

We receive a significant portion of our revenues by leasing assets under long-term triple-net leases that generally provide for fixed rental rates subject to annual escalations, while certain of our debt obligations are floating rate obligations with interest and related payments that vary with the movement of LIBOR, Bankers’ Acceptance or other indexes. The

generally fixed rate nature of a significant portion of our revenues and the variable rate nature of certain of our debt obligations create interest rate risk. Although our operating assets provide a partial hedge against interest rate fluctuations, if interest rates rise, the costs of our existing floating rate debt and any new debt that we incur would increase. These increased costs could reduce our profitability, impair our ability to meet our debt obligations, or increase the cost of financing our acquisition, investment, development and redevelopment activity. An increase in interest rates also could limit our ability to refinance existing debt upon maturity or cause us to pay higher rates upon refinancing, as well as decrease the amount that third parties are willing to pay for our assets, thereby limiting our ability to promptly reposition our portfolio in response to changes in economic or other conditions.

We may seek to manage our exposure to interest rate volatility with hedging arrangements that involve additional risks, including the risks that counterparties may fail to honor their obligations under these arrangements, that these arrangements may not be effective in reducing our exposure to interest rate changes, that the amount of income we earn from hedging transactions may be limited by federal tax provisions governing REITs, and that these arrangements may cause us to pay higher interest rates on our debt obligations than otherwise would be the case. Moreover, no amount of hedging activity can fully insulate us from the risks associated with changes in interest rates. Failure to hedge effectively against interest rate risk, if we choose to engage in such activities, could adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operationsoperations.

Changes in the method pursuant to which the LIBOR rates are determined and potential phasing out of LIBOR may affect our financial condition.results.
Limitations
LIBOR and certain other interest “benchmarks” may be subject to regulatory guidance and/or reform that could cause interest rates under our current or future debt agreements to perform differently than in the past or cause other unanticipated consequences. The United Kingdom’s Financial Conduct Authority, which regulates LIBOR, has announced that it intends to stop encouraging or requiring banks to submit rates for the calculation of LIBOR rates after 2021. While there is no consensus on our abilitywhat rate or rates may become accepted alternatives to access capitalLIBOR, the Alternative Reference Rates Committee, a steering committee comprised of U.S. financial market participants, selected the Secured Overnight Finance Rate (“SOFR”) as an alternative to LIBOR. SOFR is a broad measure of the cost of borrowing cash in the overnight U.S. treasury repo market, and the Federal Reserve Bank of New York started to publish the SOFR in May 2018. At this time, it is impossible to predict whether the SOFR or another reference rate will become an accepted alternative to LIBOR. The discontinuation, reform or replacement of LIBOR or any other benchmark rates may have an unpredictable impact on contractual mechanics in the credit markets or cause disruption to the broader financial markets, and could have an adverse effect on our ability to make required paymentsLIBOR-based interest rates on our current or future debt obligations, make distributions to our stockholders or make future investments necessary to implement our business strategy.obligations.
We cannot assure you that we will be able to raise the capital necessary to meet our debt service obligations, make distributions to our stockholders or make future investments necessary to implement our business strategy, if our cash flow from operations is insufficient to satisfy these needs, and the failure to do so could have a Material Adverse Effect on us. Although we believe that we have sufficient access to capital and other sources of funding to meet our expected liquidity needs, we cannot assure you that conditions in the capital markets will not deteriorate or that our access to capital and other sources of funding will not become constrained, which could adversely affect the availability and terms of future borrowings, renewals or refinancings and our results of operation and financial condition. If we cannot access capital at an acceptable cost or at all, we may be required to liquidate one or more investments in properties at times that may not permit us to maximize the return on those investments or that could result in adverse tax consequences to us.
As a public company, our access to debt and equity capital depends, in part, on the trading prices of our senior notes and common stock, which, in turn, depend upon market conditions that change from time to time, such as the market’s perception of our financial condition, our growth potential and our current and expected future earnings and cash distributions. Our failure to meet the market’s expectation with regard to future earnings and cash distributions or a significant downgrade in the ratings assigned to our long-term debt could impact our ability to access capital or increase our borrowing costs. We also rely on the financial institutions that are parties to our revolving credit facilities. If these institutions become capital constrained, tighten their lending standards or become insolvent or if they experience excessive volumes of borrowing requests from other borrowers within a short period of time, they may be unable or unwilling to honor their funding commitments to us, which would adversely affect our ability to draw on our revolving credit facilities and, over time, could negatively impact our ability to consummate acquisitions, repay indebtedness as it matures, fund capital expenditures or make distributions to our stockholders.
Covenants in the instruments governing our and our subsidiaries’ existing indebtedness limit our operational flexibility, and a covenant breach could materially adversely affect our operations.

The terms of the instruments governing our existing indebtedness require us to comply with certain customary financial and other covenants, such as maintaining debt service coverage, leverage ratios and minimum net worth requirements. Our continued ability to incur additional debt and to conduct business in general is subject to our compliance with these covenants, which limit our operational flexibility. Breaches of these covenants could result in defaults under the applicable debt instruments and could trigger defaults under any of our other indebtedness that is cross-defaulted against such instruments, even if we satisfy our payment obligations. In addition, covenants contained in the instruments governing our subsidiaries’ outstanding mortgage indebtedness may restrict our ability to obtain cash distributions from such subsidiaries for the purpose of meeting our debt service obligations. Financial and other covenants that limit our operational flexibility, as well as defaults resulting from our breach of any of these covenants, could adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.

27


Our Legal, Compliance and Regulatory Risks

Significant legal or regulatory proceedings could subject us or our tenants or managers to increased operating costs and substantial uninsured liabilities, which could materially adversely affect our or their liquidity, financial condition and results of operations.

From time to time, we or our tenants or managers may be subject to lawsuits, investigations, claims and other legal or regulatory proceedings arising out of our alleged actions or the alleged actions of our tenants and managers. These claims may include, among other things, professional liability and general liability claims, commercial liability claims, unfair business practices claims and employment claims, as well as regulatory proceedings, including proceedings related to our senior living operations, where we are typically the holder of the applicable healthcare license.

In our operating assets, including those in our senior living operations and office segments, we are generally responsible for all liabilities of such properties, including any lawsuits, investigations, claims and other legal or regulatory proceedings, other than those arising out of certain actions by our managers, such as those caused by gross negligence or willful misconduct. As a result, we have exposure to, among other things, professional and general liability claims, employment law claims and the associated litigation and other costs related to defending and resolving such claims. In our senior living operations in particular, if one of our managers fails to comply with applicable law or regulation, we may be deemed responsible, which could subject us to the imposition of civil, criminal and administrative penalties, including: the loss or suspension of accreditation, licenses or CONs; suspension of or non-payment for new admissions; denial of reimbursement; fines; suspension, decertification, or exclusion from federal and state healthcare programs; or facility closure.

In certain circumstances, our tenants or managers may be contractually obligated to indemnify, defend and hold us harmless in whole or in part with respect to certain actions, legal or regulatory proceedings. In addition, third parties from whom we acquired certain of our assets and, in some cases, their affiliates may be required by the terms of the related conveyance documents to indemnify, defend and hold us harmless against certain actions, investigations and claims related to the acquired assets and arising prior to our ownership or related to excluded assets and liabilities. In some cases, a Material Adverse Effectportion of the purchase price consideration is held in escrow for a specified period of time as collateral for these indemnification obligations. We cannot assure you that these third parties will be able to satisfy their defense and indemnification obligations to us or that any purchase price consideration held in escrow will be sufficient to satisfy claims for which we are entitled to indemnification.

An unfavorable resolution of any such lawsuit, investigation, claims or other legal or regulatory proceeding could materially adversely affect our or our tenants’ or managers’ liquidity, financial condition and results of operations, and may not be subject to sufficient insurance coverage. In addition, even with a favorable resolution of any such litigation or proceeding, the effect of litigation and other potential litigation and proceedings may materially increase operating costs incurred by us or our tenants or managers. Negative publicity with respect to any lawsuits, claims or other legal or regulatory proceedings may also negatively impact their or our or the properties’ reputation.

The COVID-19 pandemic may cause our senior housing and healthcare business to face increased exposure to lawsuits or other legal or regulatory proceedings filed at the same time across multiple jurisdictions, such as professional or general liability litigation alleging wrongful death and negligence claims, some of which may result in large damage awards and not be indemnified or subject to sufficient insurance coverage, may require our support as a result of our indemnification agreements or may result in restrictions in the operations of our or our tenants’ or managers’ business.

We and our tenants, borrowers and managers may be adversely affected by regulation and enforcement.

We and our tenants, borrowers and managers are subject to or impacted by extensive and frequently changing federal, state, local and international laws and regulations. For example, the healthcare industry is subject to laws and regulations that relate to, among other things, licensure and CON, conduct of operations, ownership of facilities, construction of new facilities and addition of equipment, governmental reimbursement programs, such as Medicare and Medicaid, allowable costs, services, prices for services, qualified beneficiaries, appropriateness and classification of care, patient rights, resident health and safety, data privacy and security laws, wage and hour laws, fraud and abuse and financial and other arrangements that may be entered into by healthcare providers. We generally hold the applicable healthcare licenses and enroll in applicable government healthcare programs on behalf of the properties in our senior living operations segment, which subjects us to potential liability under certain of such related healthcare laws and regulations. See “Government Regulation—United States Healthcare Regulation, Licensing and Enforcement” included in Part I, Item 1 of this Annual Report. In addition, many of our R&I tenants
28


are subject to laws and regulations that govern the research, development, clinical testing, manufacture and marketing of drugs, medical devices and similar products.

The laws and regulations that apply to us and our tenants, borrowers and managers are complex and may change rapidly, and efforts to comply and keep up with them require significant resources. Any changes in scope, interpretation or enforcement of the regulatory framework could require us or our tenants, borrowers or managers to invest significant resources responding to such changes. If we or our tenants, borrowers or managers fail to comply with the extensive laws, regulations and other requirements applicable to our or their businesses and the operation of our or their properties, we or they could face a number of remedial actions, including forced closure, loss of accreditation, bans on admissions of new patients or residents, imposition of fines, ineligibility to receive reimbursement from governmental and private third-party payor programs or civil or criminal penalties. In any such event, our and our tenants’, borrowers’ and managers’ respective businesses, results of operations (including results of properties) and financial condition could be adversely affected.

Our investments may expose us to unknown liabilities.

We may acquire or invest in properties or businesses that are subject to liabilities and without any recourse, or with only limited recourse, against the prior owners or other third parties with respect to unknown liabilities. As a result, if a liability were asserted against us based upon ownership of those properties, we might have to pay substantial sums to settle or contest it, which could adversely affect our results of operations and cash flow.

We may assume or incur liabilities, including, in some cases, contingent liabilities, and be exposed to actual or potential claims in connection with our acquisitions that adversely affect us, such as:

Liabilities relating to the clean-up or remediation of environmental conditions;

Unasserted claims of vendors or other persons dealing with the sellers;

Liabilities, claims and litigation, including indemnification obligations, whether incurred in the ordinary course of business, relating to periods prior to or following our acquisition;

Claims for indemnification by general partners, directors, officers and others indemnified by the sellers; and

Liabilities for taxes relating to periods prior to our acquisition.

If the liabilities we assume in connection with acquisitions are greater than expected, or if we discover obligations relating to the acquired properties or businesses of which we were not aware at the time of acquisition, our business and results of operations could be materially adversely affected.

We could incur substantial liabilities and costs if any of our properties are found to be contaminated with hazardous substances or we become involved in any environmental disputes.

Under federal and state environmental laws and regulations, a current or former owner of real property may be liable for costs related to the investigation, removal and remediation of hazardous or toxic substances or petroleum that are released from or are present at or under, or that are disposed of in connection with such property. Owners of real property may also face other environmental liabilities, including government fines and penalties imposed by regulatory authorities and damages for injuries to persons, property or natural resources. Environmental laws and regulations often impose liability without regard to whether the owner was aware of, or was responsible for, the presence, release or disposal of hazardous or toxic substances or petroleum. In certain circumstances, environmental liability may result from the activities of a current or former operator of the property. Although we generally have indemnification rights against the current tenants of our properties for contamination caused by them, such indemnification may not adequately cover all environmental costs. See “Government Regulation—Environmental Regulation” included in Part I, Item 1 of this Annual Report.

The occurrence of cyber incidents could disrupt our operations, result in the loss of confidential information or damage our business relationships and reputation.

Cybersecurity incidents and cyber-attacks have been occurring globally at a more frequent and severe level and will likely continue to increase in frequency in the future. As our reliance on technology has increased, our business is subject to greater risk from cyber incidents, including attempts to gain unauthorized access to our or our managers’ or venture partners’ systems to disrupt operations, corrupt data or steal confidential information, and other electronic security breaches. While we,
29


our managers and our business partners have implemented measures to help mitigate these threats, such measures cannot guarantee that we or they will be successful in preventing a cyber incident. Our information technology networks and related systems are essential to our ability to perform day-to-day operations of our business and the occurrence of a cyber incident could result in a data center outage, disrupting our systems and operations, or the operations of our managers or business partners, compromise the confidential information of our employees, partners or the residents in our senior housing communities, and damage our business relationships and reputation. Although we have implemented various measures to manage risks relating to these types of events, such systems could prove to be inadequate and, if compromised, could become inoperable for extended periods of time, cease to function properly or fail to adequately secure private information. We do not control the cybersecurity plans and systems put in place by third-party providers, and such third-party providers may have limited indemnification obligations to us, which could cause us to be negatively impacted as a result. Breaches such as those involving covertly introduced malware, impersonation of authorized users and industrial or other espionage may not be identified even with sophisticated prevention and detection systems, potentially resulting in further harm and preventing them from being addressed appropriately. The failure of these systems or of disaster recovery plans for any reason could cause significant interruptions in our operations and result in a failure to maintain the security, confidentiality or privacy of sensitive data, including personal information, material nonpublic information and intellectual property and trade secrets and other sensitive information in our possession. We could be required to make a significant investment to remedy the effects of any such failures, including but not limited to harm to our reputation, legal claims that we and our partners may be subjected to, regulatory or enforcement action arising out of applicable privacy and other laws, adverse publicity, or other events that may affect our business and financial performance.

The amount and scope of insurance coverage provided by our policies and policies maintained by our tenants, managers or other counterparties may not adequately insure against losses.

We maintain or require in our lease, management and other agreements that our tenants, managers or other counterparties maintain comprehensive insurance coverage on our properties and their operations with terms, conditions, limits and deductibles that we believe are customary for similarly situated companies in each industry. Although we frequently review our insurance programs and requirements, we cannot assure you that we or our tenants, managers or other counterparties, will be able to procure or maintain adequate levels of insurance. As a result of the COVID-19 pandemic, the cost of insurance is expected to increase, and such insurance may not cover certain claims related to COVID-19. We also cannot assure you that we or our tenants, managers or other counterparties will maintain the insurance coverage required under our lease, management and other agreements, that we will continue to require the same levels of insurance under our lease, management and other agreements, that such insurance will be available at a reasonable cost in the future or at all or that the policies maintained will fully cover all losses on our properties upon the occurrence of a catastrophic event. Furthermore, we cannot make any guaranty as to the future financial viability of the insurers that underwrite our policies and the policies maintained by our tenants, managers and other counterparties. If we sustain losses in excess of our insurance coverage, we may be required to pay the difference and we could lose our investment in, or experience reduced profits and cash flows from our operations.

In certain cases, we and our tenants and managers may be subject to professional liability, general liability, employment, premise, privacy, environmental, unfair business practice and contracts claims brought by plaintiffs’ attorneys seeking significant damages and attorneys’ fees, some of which may not be insured or indemnified and some of which may result in significant damage awards. Due to the historically high frequency and severity of professional liability claims against senior housing and healthcare providers, the availability of professional liability insurance has decreased and the premiums on such insurance coverage remain costly. In addition, insurance for other claims such as wage and hour, certain environmental, privacy and unfair business practices may no longer be available, and the premiums on such insurance coverage, to the extent it is available, remain costly. As a result, insurance protection against such claims may not be sufficient to cover all claims against us or our tenants or managers and may not be available at a reasonable cost or otherwise on terms that provide adequate coverage. If we or our tenants and managers are unable to maintain adequate insurance coverage or are required to pay damages, we or they may be exposed to substantial liabilities and the adverse impact on our or our tenants’ and managers’ respective financial condition, results of operations and cash flows could be material, and could adversely affect our tenants’ and managers’ ability to meet their obligations to us.


Risks Arising from Our StatusAdditionally, we and those of our tenants and managers who self-insure or who transfer risk of losses to a wholly owned captive insurance company could incur large funded and unfunded property and liability expenses, which could materially adversely affect theirs or our liquidity, financial condition and results of operations.

Failure to maintain effective internal controls could harm our business, results of operations and financial condition.

30


Pursuant to the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, we are required to provide a report by management on internal control over financial reporting, including management’s assessment of the effectiveness of such control. Because of its inherent limitations, including the possibility of human error, the circumvention or overriding of controls, or fraud, effective internal controls over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatement and can provide only reasonable assurance with respect to the preparation and fair presentation of financial statements. If we fail to maintain the adequacy of our internal controls over financial reporting and our operating internal controls, including any failure to implement required new or improved controls as a result of changes to our business or otherwise, or if we experience difficulties in their implementation, our business, financial condition and results of operations could be adversely affected and we could fail to meet our reporting obligations.

Our REIT Status Risks

Loss of our status as a REIT would have significant adverse consequences for us and the value of our common stock.

If we lose our status as a REIT (currently or with respect to any tax years for which the statute of limitations has not expired), we will face serious tax consequences that will substantially reduce the funds available to satisfy our obligations, to implement our business strategy and to make distributions to our stockholders for each of the years involved because:

We would not be allowed a deduction for distributions to stockholders in computing our taxable income and would be subject to regular U.S. federal corporate income tax;

We could be subject to increased state and local taxes; and

Unless we are entitled to relief under statutory provisions, we could not elect to be subject to tax as a REIT for four taxable years following the year during which we were disqualified.

In addition, in such event we would no longer be required to pay dividends to maintain REIT status, which could adversely affect the value of our common stock.

Qualification as a REIT involves the application of highly technical and complex provisions of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the “Code”) for which there are only limited judicial and administrative interpretations. The determination of factual matters and circumstances not entirely within our control, as well as new legislation, regulations, administrative interpretations or court decisions, may adversely affect our investors or our ability to remain qualified as a REIT for tax purposes. In order to maintain our qualification as a REIT, we must satisfy a number of requirements, generally including requirements regarding the ownership of our stock, requirements regarding the composition of our assets, a requirement that at least 95% of our gross income in any year must be derived from qualifying sources, and we must make distributions to our stockholders aggregating annually at least 90% of our net taxable income, excluding capital gains. Although we believe that we currently qualify as a REIT, we cannot assure you that we will continue to qualify for all future periods.

The 90% distribution requirement will decrease our liquidity and may limit our ability to engage in otherwise beneficial transactions.

To comply with the 90% distribution requirement applicable to REITs and to avoid the nondeductible excise tax, we must make distributions to our stockholders. Such distributions reduce the funds we have available to finance our investment, acquisition, development and redevelopment activity and may limit our ability to engage in transactions that are otherwise in the best interests of our stockholders.
Although we do not anticipate any inability to satisfy the REIT distribution requirement, from
From time to time, we may not have sufficient cash or other liquid assets to do so.satisfy the REIT distribution requirements. For example, timing differences between the actual receipt of income and actual payment of deductible expenses, on the one hand, and the inclusion of that income and deduction of those expenses in arriving at our taxable income, on the other hand, or non-deductible expenses such as principal amortization or repayments or capital expenditures in excess of non-cash deductions may prevent us from having sufficient cash or liquid assets to satisfy the 90% distribution requirement.

In the event that timing differences occur or we decide to retain cash or to distribute such greater amount as may be necessary to avoid income and excise taxation, we may seek to borrow funds, issue additional equity securities, pay taxable stock dividends, distribute other property or securities or engage in a transaction intended to enable us to meet the REIT distribution requirements. Any of these actions may require us to raise additional capital to meet our obligations; however, see “Risks Arising from “—Our Capital Structure—Structure Risks—We are highly dependent on access to the capital markets. Limitations on our ability to access capital could have an adverse effect on us, including our ability to make required payments on our debt obligations, make
31


distributions to our stockholders or make future investments necessary to implement our business strategy.strategy.The terms of the instruments governing our existing indebtedness restrict our ability to engage in certain of these transactions.

To preserve our qualification as a REIT, our certificate of incorporation contains ownership limits with respect to our capital stock that may delay, defer or prevent a change of control of our company.

To assist us in preserving our qualification as a REIT, our certificate of incorporation provides that if a person acquires beneficial ownership of more than 9.0% of our outstanding common stock or more than 9.9% of our outstanding preferred stock, the shares that are beneficially owned in excess of the applicable limit are considered “excess shares” and are automatically deemed transferred to a trust for the benefit of a charitable institution or other qualifying organization selected by our Board of Directors. The trust is entitled to all dividends with respect to the excess shares and the trustee may exercise all voting power over the excess shares. In addition, we have the right to purchase the excess shares for a price equal to the lesser

of (i) the price per share in the transaction that created the excess shares or (ii) the market price on the day we purchase the shares, but ifshares. If we do not purchase the excess shares, the trustee of the trust is required to transfer the shares at the direction of our Board of Directors. These ownership limits could delay, defer or prevent a transaction or a change of control that might involve a premium price for our common stock or might otherwise be in the best interests of our stockholders.

Our use of TRSs is limited under the Code.


Under the Code, no more than 20% of the value of the gross assets of a REIT may be represented by securities of one or more TRSs. This limitation may affect our ability to increase the size of our TRSs’ operations and assets, and there can be no assurance that we will be able to comply with the applicable limitation, or that such compliance will not adversely affect our business. Also, our TRSs may not, among other things, operate or manage certain health carehealthcare facilities, which may cause us to foregoforgo investments we might otherwise make. Finally, we may be subject to a 100% excise tax on the income derived from certain transactions with our TRSs that are not on an arm's-length basis. We believe our arrangements with our TRSs are on arm's-length terms and intend to continue to operate in a manner that allows us to avoid incurring the 100% excise tax described above, but there can be no assurance that we will be able to avoid application of that tax.


Complying with REIT requirements may cause us to forego otherwise attractive opportunities (including investing in our tenants) or liquidate otherwise attractive investments.

To qualify as a REIT for federal income tax purposes, we must continually satisfy tests concerning, among other things, the sources of our income, the nature and diversification of our assets, the amounts we distribute to our stockholders and the ownership of our common stock. In order to meet these tests, we may be required to forego investments we might otherwise make (including investments in our tenants) or to liquidate otherwise attractive investments. This limited investment scope could also lead to financial risks or limit our flexibility during times of operating instability.

The lease of qualified healthcare properties to a TRS is subject to special requirements.

We lease certain healthcare properties to TRSs, which lessees contract with third-party managers to manage the healthcare operations at these properties. The rents we receive from a TRS pursuant to this arrangement are treated as qualifying rents from real property if the healthcare property is a qualified healthcare property (as defined in the Code), the rents are paid pursuant to an arm’s-length lease with a TRS and the manager qualifies as an eligible independent contractor (as defined in the Code). We have structured the applicable leases and related arrangements in a manner intended to meet these requirements, but there can be no assurance that these conditions will be satisfied. If any of these conditions is not satisfied with respect to a particular lease, then the rents we receive with respect to such lease will not be qualifying rents, which could have an adverse effect on our ability to comply with REIT income tests and thus on our ability to qualify as a REIT unless we are able to avail ourselves of certain relief provisions.

The tax imposed on REITs engaging in “prohibited transactions” may limit our ability to engage in transactions which would be treated as sales for federal income tax purposes.

A REIT’s net income from prohibited transactions is subject to a 100% penalty tax. In general, prohibited transactions are sales or other dispositions of property, other than foreclosure property, held primarily for sale to customers in the ordinary course of business.business, unless certain safe harbor exceptions apply. Although we do not intend to hold any properties that would be characterized as held for sale to customers in the ordinary course of our business, unless a sale or disposition qualifies under certain statutory safe harbors, such characterization is a factual determination and no guarantee can be given that the IRS would agree with our characterization of our properties or that we will always be able to make use of the available safe harbors.


32


Legislative or other actions affecting REITs could have a negative effect on our stockholders or us.

The rules dealing with federal income taxation are constantly under review by persons involved in the legislative process and by the IRS and the U.S. Treasury Department. Changes to the tax laws, with or without retroactive application, could adversely affect our investors or us. We cannot predict how changes in the tax laws might affect our investors or us. New legislation, U.S. Treasury Department regulations, administrative interpretations or court decisions could significantly and negatively affect our ability to qualify as a REIT, the federal income tax consequences of such qualification, or the federal income tax consequences of an investment in us. Also, the law relating to the tax treatment of other entities, or an investment in other entities, could change, making an investment in such other entities more attractive relative to an investment in a REIT.


The recently enacted Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2017 (the “2017 Tax Act”) has significantly changed the U.S. federal income taxation of U.S. businesses and their owners, including REITs and their stockholders. Changes made by the 2017 Tax Act that could affect us and our stockholders include:
temporarily reducing individual U.S. federal income tax rates on ordinary income; the highest individual U.S. federal income tax rate has been reduced from 39.6% to 37% for taxable years beginning after December 31, 2017 and before January 1, 2026;
permanently eliminating the progressive corporate tax rate structure, which previously imposed a maximum corporate tax rate of 35%, and replacing it with a flat corporate tax rate of 21%;
permitting a deduction for certain pass-through business income, including dividends received by our stockholders from us that are not designated by us as capital gain dividends or qualified dividend income, which will allow individuals, trusts, and estates to deduct up to 20% of such amounts for taxable years beginning after December 31, 2017 and before January 1, 2026;
reducing the highest rate of withholding with respect to our distributions to non-U.S. stockholders that are treated as attributable to gains from the sale or exchange of U.S. real property interests from 35% to 21%;
limiting our deduction for net operating losses arising in taxable years beginning after December 31, 2017 to 80% of REIT taxable income (prior to the application of the dividends paid deduction);
generally limiting the deduction for net business interest expense in excess of 30% of a business’s “adjusted taxable income,” except for taxpayers (including most equity REITs) that engage in certain real estate businesses

and elect out of this rule (provided that such electing taxpayers must use an alternative depreciation system with longer depreciation periods); and
eliminating the corporate alternative minimum tax.

Many of these changes are effective immediately, without any transition periods or grandfathering for existing transactions. The 2017 Tax Act is unclear in many respects and could be subject to potential amendments and technical corrections, as well as interpretations and implementing regulations by the U.S. Treasury Department and IRS, any of which could lessen or increase the impact of the 2017 Tax Act. In addition, it is unclear how these U.S. federal income tax changes will affect state and local taxation, which often usesuse federal taxable income as a starting point for computing state and local tax liabilities. While some of the changes made by the 2017 Tax Act may adversely affect us in one or more reporting periods and prospectively, other changes may be beneficial on a going forward basis. We continue to work with our tax advisors and auditors to determine the full impact that the 2017 Tax Act as a whole will have on us.


ITEM 1B.    Unresolved Staff Comments

None.


ITEM 2.    Properties
Seniors
Senior Housing and Healthcare Properties

As of December 31, 2017,2020, we owned more thanor managed through unconsolidated real estate entities approximately 1,200 properties (including properties owned through investments in unconsolidated entities and properties classified as held for sale), consisting of seniorssenior housing communities, medical office buildings (“MOBs”), life science, research and innovation centers, inpatient rehabilitation facilities (“IRFs”) and long-term acute care facilities (“LTACs”), and health systems and skilled nursing facilities (“SNFs”), and wesystems. We had 1413 properties under development, including four properties thatthree of which are owned by unconsolidated real estate entities. We believe that maintaining a balanced portfolio of high-quality assets diversified by investment type, geographic location, asset type, tenant/operator, revenue source and operating model makes us less susceptible to single-state regulatory or reimbursement changes, regional climate events and local economic downturns and diminishes the risk that any single factor or event could materially harm our business.

As of December 31, 2017,2020, we had $1.3$2.2 billion aggregate principal amount of mortgage loan and secured revolving construction credit facility indebtedness outstanding, secured by 8880 of our properties. Excluding those portions attributedthe portion of such indebtedness attributable to our joint venture partners, our share of mortgage loan and secured revolving construction credit facility indebtedness outstanding was $1.2$2.0 billion.

The following table provides additional information regarding the geographic diversification of our consolidated portfolio of properties as of December 31, 2017 (including2020 (excluding properties owned through investments in unconsolidated real estate entities but excludingand properties classified as held for sale):

.
33


Seniors Housing
Communities
 SNFs MOBs Life Science and Innovation Centers IRFs and LTACs Health Systems Senior Housing
Communities
SNFsMOBsResearch and Innovation CentersIRFs and LTACsHealth Systems
Geographic Location
# of
Properties
 Units # of Properties 
Licensed
Beds
 # of Properties 
Square Feet(1)
 # of Properties 
Square Feet(1)
 # of Properties Licensed Beds # of Properties Licensed BedsGeographic Location# of
Properties
Units# of PropertiesLicensed Beds# of Properties
Square Feet(1)
# of Properties
Square Feet(1)
# of PropertiesLicensed Beds# of PropertiesLicensed Beds
Alabama6
 122
 
 
 4
 469
 
 
 
 
 
 
Alabama324 — — 469 — — — — — — 
ArkansasArkansas302 — — — — — — — — 
Arizona28
 2,394
 
 
 13
 830
 
 
 1
 60
 
 
Arizona26 2,256 — — 15 962 227 60 — — 
Arkansas4
 287
 
 
 1
 5
 
 
 
 
 
 
California92
 9,633
 
 
 26
 2,058
 
 
 6
 503
 
 
California84 9,494 — — 30 2,491 784 503 — — 
Colorado19
 1,689
 1
 82
 13
 769
 
 
 1
 68
 
 
Colorado15 1,257 82 13 896 — — 68 — — 
Connecticut14
 1,631
 
 
 
 
 2
 1,032
 
 
 
 
Connecticut13 1,587 — — — — 1,032 — — — — 
District of Columbia
 
 
 
 2
 102
 
 
 
 
 
 
District of Columbia— — — — 102 — — — — — — 
Florida50
 4,582
 
 
 19
 404
 1
 259
 6
 511
 
 
Florida46 4,561 — — 11 223 252 508 — — 
Georgia20
 1,751
 
 
 14
 1,201
 
 
 
 
 
 
Georgia19 1,695 — — 14 1,187 — — — — — — 
Idaho1
 70
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Idaho70 — — — — — — — — — — 
Illinois25
 2,953
 1
 82
 36
 1,448
 1
 129
 4
 430
 
 
Illinois25 2,955 82 35 1,424 129 430 — — 
Indiana9
 680
 
 
 23
 1,603
 
 
 1
 59
 
 
Indiana402 — — 23 1,603 — — 59 — — 
Kansas9
 541
 
 
 1
 33
 
 
 
 
 
 
Kansas515 — — — — — — — — — — 
Kentucky10
 911
 2
 280
 4
 173
 
 
 1
 384
 
 
Kentucky805 — — 120 — — 384 — — 
Louisiana1
 58
 
 
 5
 361
 
 
 
 
 
 
Louisiana58 — — 362 — — — — — — 
MassachusettsMassachusetts15 1,838 — — — — 78 — — — — 
MarylandMaryland352 — — 83 467 — — — — 
Maine6
 445
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Maine452 — — — — — — — — — — 
Maryland5
 360
 
 
 2
 83
 5
 489
 
 
 
 
Massachusetts19
 2,100
 6
 745
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Michigan23
 1,457
 
 
 14
 599
 
 
 
 
 
 
Michigan21 1,345 — — 13 589 — — — — — — 
Minnesota14
 855
 
 
 4
 241
 
 
 
 
 
 
Minnesota14 856 — — 241 — — — — — — 
MissouriMissouri154 — — 21 1,168 818 60 — — 
Mississippi
 
 
 
 1
 51
 
 
 
 
 
 
Mississippi— — — — 51 — — — — — — 
Missouri2
 153
 
 
 20
 1,096
 4
 636
 1
 60
 
 
Montana3
 182
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Montana222 — — — — — — — — — — 
North CarolinaNorth Carolina22 1,666 — — 17 831 10 1,712 124 — — 
North DakotaNorth Dakota115 — — 114 — — — — — — 
Nebraska1
 134
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Nebraska133 — — — — — — — — — — 
Nevada5
 589
 
 
 5
 416
 
 
 1
 52
 
 
New Hampshire1
 125
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
New Hampshire126 — — — — — — — — — — 
New Jersey12
 1,136
 1
 153
 3
 37
 
 
 
 
 
 
New Jersey14 1,301 153 37 — — — — — — 
New Mexico4
 450
 
 
 
 
 
 
 2
 123
 4
 544
New Mexico451 — — — — — — 123 544 
NevadaNevada326 — — 416 — — 52 — — 
New York41
 4,538
 
 
 4
 244
 
 
 
 
 
 
New York41 4,729 — — 244 — — — — — — 
North Carolina23
 1,894
 
 
 18
 759
 8
 1,371
 1
 124
 
 
North Dakota2
 115
 
 
 1
 114
 
 
 
 
 
 
Ohio20
 1,225
 6
 907
 28
 1,225
 
 
 1
 50
 
 
Ohio24 1,664 — — 28 1,226 — — 50 — — 
Oklahoma8
 463
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 4
 954
Oklahoma439 — — 80 — — — — 954 
Oregon29
 2,584
 
 
 1
 105
 
 
 
 
 
 
Oregon23 2,109 — — 105 — — — — — — 
Pennsylvania32
 2,362
 4
 620
 9
 713
 3
 566
 1
 52
 
 
Pennsylvania31 2,326 620 713 953 52 — — 
Rhode Island6
 596
 
 
 
 
 2
 250
 
 
 
 
Rhode Island399 — — — — 580 — — — — 
South Carolina5
 402
 
 
 20
 1,104
 
 
 
 
 
 
South Carolina494 — — 20 1,093 — — — — — — 
South Dakota4
 182
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
South Dakota182 — — — — — — — — — — 
Tennessee18
 1,420
 
 
 10
 395
 
 
 1
 49
 
 
Tennessee17 1,247 — — 278 — — 49 — — 
Texas49
 3,786
 
 
 18
 814
 
 
 9
 590
 1
 445
Texas45 3,588 — — 16 837 — — 617 445 
Utah3
 321
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Utah321 — — — — — — — — — — 
Virginia8
 655
 
 
 5
 231
 3
 425
 
 
 
 
Virginia655 — — 231 453 — — — — 
Washington28
 2,357
 5
 469
 10
 579
 
 
 
 
 
 
Washington19 1,909 469 10 579 — — — — — — 
WisconsinWisconsin45 2,218 — — 21 1,105 — — — — — — 
West Virginia2
 124
 4
 326
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
West Virginia123 326 — — — — — — — — 
Wisconsin48
 2,219
 
 
 21
 1,105
 ��
 
 
 
 
 
Wyoming2
 168
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Wyoming169 — — — — — — — — — — 
Total U.S.711
 60,699
 30
 3,664
 355
 19,367
 29
 5,157
 37
 3,115

9

1,943
Total U.S.655 58,190 16 1,732 345 19,860 40 7,487 37 3,139 10 1,943 
Canada41
 4,499
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Canada74 13,943 — — — — — — — — — — 
United Kingdom12
 779
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 3
 121
United Kingdom12 776 — — — — — — — — 121 
Total764
 65,977
 30
 3,664
 355
 19,367
 29
 5,157
 37
 3,115

12

2,064
Total741 72,909 16 1,732 345 19,860 40 7,487 37 3,139 13 2,064 
(1)

(1)Square Feet are in thousands. Totals may not foot due to rounding.
34


Square Feet are in thousands

Corporate Offices

Our headquarters are located in Chicago, Illinois and we have an additional corporate office in Louisville, Kentucky. We lease all of our corporate offices.



ITEM 3.    Legal Proceedings


The information contained in “NOTE 14—COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES”“Note 14 – Commitments and Contingencies” of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements included in Part II, Item 8 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K is incorporated by reference into this Item 3. Except as set forth therein, we are not a party to, nor is any of our property the subject of, any material pending legal proceedings.


ITEM 4.    Mine Safety Disclosures

Not applicable.


35


PART II

ITEM 5.    Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities

Market Information


Our common stock, par value $0.25 per share, is listed and traded on the New York Stock Exchange (the “NYSE”) under the symbol “VTR.”     The following table sets forth, for the periods indicated, the high and low sales prices of our common stock as reported on the NYSE and the dividends declared per share.
 
Sales Price of
Common Stock
 
Cash Dividends
Declared
 High Low 
2016     
First Quarter$63.22
 $48.43
 $0.73
Second Quarter72.82
 59.69
 0.73
Third Quarter76.56
 67.33
 0.73
Fourth Quarter69.19
 57.86
 0.775
2017     
First Quarter$65.41
 $59.36
 $0.775
Second Quarter71.93
 62.63
 0.775
Third Quarter69.98
 64.80
 0.775
Fourth Quarter65.39
 59.84
 0.79

As of January 31, 2018, we had 356.2February 18, 2021, there were 374.7 million shares of our common stock outstanding, held by approximately 4,5203,802 stockholders of record.


Dividends and Distributions


We pay regular quarterly dividends to holders of our common stock to comply with the provisions of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the “Code”), governing REITs. In order to maintain our qualification as a REIT, we are required under the Code, among other things, to distribute annually at least 90% of our REIT taxable income, determined without regard to any net capital gain. In addition, we will be subject to income tax at the regular corporate rate to the extent we distribute less than 100% of our REIT taxable income, including any net capital gains. During the year ended December 31, 2017, we paid the first three quarterly installments of our 2017 dividend of $0.775 per share. In December 2017, we declared the fourth quarter cash dividend on our common stock of $0.79 per share, which was paid in January 2018.

On February 9, 2018, our Board of Directors declared the first quarterly installment of our 2018 dividend on our common stock in the amount of $0.79 per share, payable in cash on April 12, 2018 to stockholders of record on April 2, 2018. We expect to distribute at least 100% of our taxable net income, after the use of any net operating loss carryforwards, to our stockholders for 2018.2021.


In general, our Board of Directors makes decisions regarding the nature, frequency and amount of our dividends on a quarterly basis. Because the Board considers many factors when making these decisions, including our present and future liquidity needs, our current and projected financial condition and results of operations and the performance and credit quality of our tenants, operators, borrowers and managers, we cannot assure you that we will maintain the practice of paying regular quarterly dividends to continue to qualify as a REIT. Please see “Cautionary Statements” and the risk factors included in Part I, Item 1A of this Annual Report on Form 10-K for a description of other factors that may affect our distribution policy.


Director and Employee Stock Sales


Certain of our directors, executive officers and other employees have adopted and,or, from time to time in the future, may adopt non-discretionary, written trading plans that comply with Rule 10b5-1 under the Exchange Act, or otherwise monetize, gift or transfer their equity-based compensation. These transactions typically are conducted for estate, tax and financial planning purposes and are subject to compliance with our Amended and Restated Securities Trading Policy and Procedures (“Securities Trading Policy”), the minimum stock ownership requirements contained in our Guidelines on Governance and all applicable laws and regulations.



Our Securities Trading Policy expressly prohibits our directors, executive officers and employees from buying or selling derivatives with respect to our securities or other financial instruments that are designed to hedge or offset a decrease in the market value of our securities and from engaging in short sales with respect to our securities. In addition, our Securities Trading Policy prohibits our directors and executive officers from holding our securities in margin accounts or pledging our securities to secure loans without the prior approval of our Audit and Compliance Committee. Each of our directors and executive officers has advised us that he or she is in compliance with the Securities Trading Policy and has not pledged any of our equity securities to secure margin or other loans.


Stock Repurchases


The table below summarizes repurchases of our common stock made during the quarter ended December 31, 2017:2020:
Number of Shares
Repurchased (1)
Average Price
Per Share
Total Number of Shares Purchased as Part of Publicly Announced Plans or ProgramsMaximum Number (or Approximate Dollar Value) of Shares that May Yet be Purchased Under the Plans or Programs
October 1 through October 31158 $42.19 — — 
November 1 through November 30138 46.52 — — 
December 1 through December 31226 48.79 — — 
Total522 $46.19 — — 

(1)Repurchases represent shares withheld to pay taxes on the vesting of restricted stock granted to employees under our 2006 Incentive Plan or 2012
36


 
Number of Shares
Repurchased (1)
 
Average Price
Per Share
October 1 through October 318,378
 $62.51
November 1 through November 30
 $
December 1 through December 31
 $
Incentive Plan or restricted stock units granted to employees under the Nationwide Health Properties, Inc. (“NHP��) 2005 Performance Incentive Plan and assumed by us in connection with our acquisition of NHP. The value of the shares withheld is the closing price of our common stock on the date the vesting or exercise occurred (or, if not a trading day, the immediately preceding trading day) or the fair market value of our common stock at the time of the exercise, as the case may be.


(1)Repurchases represent shares withheld to pay taxes on the vesting of restricted stock granted to employees under our 2006 Incentive Plan or 2012 Incentive Plan or restricted stock units granted to employees under the Nationwide Health Properties, Inc. (“NHP”) 2005 Performance Incentive Plan and assumed by us in connection with our acquisition of NHP. The value of the shares withheld is the closing price of our common stock on the date the vesting or exercise occurred (or, if not a trading day, the immediately preceding trading day) or the fair market value of our common stock at the time of the exercise, as the case may be.

Stock Performance Graph


The following performance graph compares the cumulative total return (including dividends) to the holders of our common stock from December 31, 20122015 through December 31, 2017,2020, with the cumulative total returns of the NYSE Composite Index, the FTSE NAREITNareit Composite REIT Index (the “Composite REIT Index”) and the S&P 500 Index over the same period. The comparison assumes $100 was invested on December 31, 20122015 in our common stock and in each of the foregoing indexes and assumes reinvestment of dividends, as applicable. We have included the NYSE Composite Index in the performance graph because our common stock is listed on the NYSE, and we have included the S&P 500 Index because we are a member of the S&P 500. We have included the Composite REIT Index because we believe that it is most representative of the industries in which we compete, or otherwise provides a fair basis for comparison with us, and is therefore particularly relevant to an assessment of our performance. The figures in the table below are rounded to the nearest dollar.

12/31/201512/31/201612/31/201712/31/201812/31/201912/31/2020
Ventas$100 $116 $117 $121 $125 $113 
NYSE Composite Index$100 $112 $133 $122 $153 $164 
Composite REIT Index$100 $109 $120 $115 $147 $138 
S&P 500 Index$100 $112 $136 $130 $171 $203 
vtr-20201231_g1.jpg
37
 12/31/2012 12/31/2013 12/31/2014 12/31/2015 12/31/2016 12/31/2017
Ventas$100 $92.36 $120.92 $114.20 $132.64 $133.54
NYSE Composite Index$100 $126.40 $135.09 $129.72 $145.38 $172.83
Composite REIT Index$100 $102.34 $130.21 $132.88 $145.33 $158.84
S&P 500 Index$100 $132.37 $150.48 $152.55 $170.78 $208.05






ITEM 6.    Selected Financial Data


The selected financial data has been derived from our audited Consolidated Financial Statements included in Part II, Item 8 of this Annual Report and previous Annual Reports. You should read the following selected financial data in conjunction with “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” included in Part II, Item 7 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K and our Consolidated Financial Statements and the notes thereto included in Part II, Item 8 of this Annual Report, on Form 10-K, as acquisitions, dispositions, changes in accounting policies and other items may impact the comparability of the financial data.
 As of and For the Years Ended December 31,
 20202019201820172016
 (Dollars in thousands, except per share data)
Operating Data     
Rental income$1,494,892 $1,609,876 $1,513,807 $1,593,598 $1,476,176 
Resident fees and services2,197,160 2,151,533 2,069,477 1,843,232 1,847,306 
Interest expense469,541 451,662 442,497 448,196 419,740 
Property-level operating expenses1,937,443 1,808,208 1,689,880 1,483,072 1,434,762 
General, administrative and professional fees130,158 158,726 145,978 135,490 126,875 
Income from continuing operations441,185 439,297 415,991 1,361,222 652,412 
Net income attributable to common stockholders439,149 433,016 409,467 1,356,470 649,231 
Per Share Data
Income from continuing operations:
Basic$1.18 $1.20 $1.17 $3.83 $1.89 
Diluted$1.17 $1.19 $1.16 $3.80 $1.87 
Net income attributable to common stockholders:
Basic$1.18 $1.18 $1.15 $3.82 $1.88 
Diluted$1.17 $1.17 $1.14 $3.78 $1.86 
Cash dividends declared per common share$2.143 $3.170 $3.163 $3.115 $2.965 
Other Data
Net cash provided by operating activities$1,450,176 $1,437,783 $1,381,467 $1,428,752 $1,354,702 
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities154,295 (1,585,299)324,496 (937,107)(1,214,280)
Net cash (used in) provided by financing activities(1,300,021)160,674 (1,761,937)(671,327)96,838 
FFO attributable to common stockholders(1)
1,269,255 1,436,049 1,308,149 1,512,885 1,440,544 
Normalized FFO attributable to common stockholders (1)
1,249,972 1,423,047 1,462,055 1,491,241 1,438,643 
Balance Sheet Data
Real estate property, gross$28,427,700 $28,826,816 $26,476,938 $26,260,553 $25,380,524 
Cash and cash equivalents413,327 106,363 72,277 81,355 286,707 
Total assets23,929,404 24,692,208 22,584,555 23,954,541 23,166,600 
Senior notes payable and other debt11,895,412 12,158,773 10,733,699 11,276,062 11,127,326 

(1)We consider Funds From Operations attributable to common stockholders (“FFO”) and normalized FFO attributable to common stockholders to be appropriate supplemental measures of operating performance of an equity REIT. In particular, we believe that normalized FFO is useful because it allows investors, analysts and our management to compare our operating performance to the operating performance of other real estate companies and between periods on a consistent basis without having to account for differences caused by non-recurring items and other non-operational events such as transactions and litigation. In some cases, we provide information about identified non-cash components of FFO and normalized FFO because it allows investors, analysts and our management to assess the impact of those items on our financial results.

38

 As of and For the Years Ended December 31,
 2017 2016 2015 2014 2013
 (Dollars in thousands, except per share data)
Operating Data         
Rental income$1,593,598
 $1,476,176
 $1,346,046
 $1,138,457
 $1,036,356
Resident fees and services1,843,232
 1,847,306
 1,811,255
 1,552,951
 1,406,005
Interest expense448,196
 419,740
 367,114
 292,065
 249,009
Property-level operating expenses1,483,072
 1,434,762
 1,383,640
 1,195,388
 1,109,925
General, administrative and professional fees135,490
 126,875
 128,035
 121,738
 115,083
Income from continuing operations643,949
 554,209
 389,539
 359,296
 375,498
Net income attributable to common stockholders1,356,470
 649,231
 417,843
 475,767
 453,509
Per Share Data         
Income from continuing operations:         
Basic$1.81
 $1.61
 $1.18
 $1.22
 $1.28
Diluted$1.80
 $1.59
 $1.17
 $1.21
 $1.27
Net income attributable to common stockholders:         
Basic$3.82
 $1.88
 $1.26
 $1.62
 $1.55
Diluted$3.78
 $1.86
 $1.25
 $1.60
 $1.54
Dividends declared per common share$3.115
 $2.965
 $3.04
 $2.965
 $2.735
Other Data         
Net cash provided by operating activities$1,442,180
 $1,372,341
 $1,398,831
 $1,261,281
 $1,201,706
Net cash used in investing activities(976,517) (1,234,643) (2,423,692) (2,055,040) (1,282,760)
Net cash (used in) provided by financing activities(671,327) 96,838
 1,023,058
 751,621
 108,045
FFO (1)
1,512,885
 1,440,544
 1,365,408
 1,273,680
 1,208,458
Normalized FFO (1)
1,491,241
 1,438,643
 1,493,683
 1,330,018
 1,220,709
Balance Sheet Data         
Real estate investments, at cost$26,205,833
 $25,327,215
 $23,802,454
 $20,196,770
 $21,403,592
Cash and cash equivalents81,355
 286,707
 53,023
 55,348
 94,816
Total assets23,954,541
 23,166,600
 22,261,918
 21,165,913
 19,731,494
Senior notes payable and other debt11,276,062
 11,127,326
 11,206,996
 10,844,351
 9,364,992


(1)
We consider Funds From Operations (“FFO”) and normalized FFO to be useful supplemental measures of operating performance of an equity REIT. In particular, we believe that normalized FFO is useful because it allows investors, analysts and our management to compare our operating performance to the operating performance of other real estate companies and between periods on a consistent basis without having to account for differences caused by non-recurring items and other non-operational events such as transactions and litigation. In some cases, we provide information about identified non-cash components of FFO and normalized FFO because it allows investors, analysts and our management to assess the impact of those items on our financial results.

FFO and normalized FFO presented in this Annual Report, on Form 10-K, or otherwise disclosed by us, may not be comparable to FFO and normalized FFO presented by other real estate companies due to the fact that not all real estate companies use the same definitions. FFO and normalized FFO should not be considered as alternatives to net income or income from continuing operations (both determinedattributable to common stockholders (determined in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles

(“GAAP”)) as indicators of our financial performance or as alternatives to cash flow from operating activities (determined in accordance with GAAP) as measures of our liquidity, nor are FFO and normalized FFO necessarily indicative of sufficient cash flow to fund all of our needs.


We use the National Association of Real Estate Investment Trusts (“NAREIT”Nareit”) definition of FFO. NAREITNareit defines FFO as net income attributable to common stockholders (computed in accordance with GAAP), excluding gains or losses from sales of real estate property, including gains or losses on re-measurementremeasurement of equity method investments, and impairment write-downs of depreciable real estate, plus real estate depreciation and amortization, and after adjustments for unconsolidated partnerships and joint ventures. Adjustments for unconsolidated partnerships and joint ventures will be calculated to reflect FFO on the same basis. We define normalized FFO as FFO excluding the following income and expense items (which may be recurring in nature): (a) merger-related costs and expenses, including amortization of intangibles, transition and integration expenses, and deal costs and expenses, including expenses and recoveries relating to acquisition lawsuits; (b) the impact of any expenses related to asset impairment and valuation allowances, the write-off of unamortized deferred financing fees, or additional costs, expenses, discounts, make-whole payments, penalties or premiums incurred as a result of early retirement or payment of our debt; (c) the non-cash effect of income tax benefits or expenses, the non-cash impact of changes to our executive equity compensation plan, and derivative transactions that have non-cash mark-to-market impacts on our Consolidated Statements of Income;Income and non-cash charges related to leases; (d) the financial impact of contingent consideration, severance-related costs and charitable donations made to the Ventas Charitable Foundation; (e) gains and losses for non-operational foreign currency hedge agreements and changes in the fair value of financial instruments; (f) gains and losses on non-real estate dispositions and other unusual items related to unconsolidated entities; (g) expenses related to the re-auditreaudit and re-review in 2014 of our historical financial statements and related matters; and (h) net expenses or recoveries related to natural disasters.disasters; and (i) other incremental items set forth in the normalized FFO reconciliation included herein.


See “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations—Funds From Operations and Normalized Funds from Operations”Non-GAAP Financial Measures” included in Part II, Item 7 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K for a reconciliation of FFO and normalized FFO to our GAAP earnings.


ITEM 7.    Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations


The following discussion provides information that management believes is relevant to an understanding and assessment of the consolidated financial condition and results of operations of Ventas, Inc. You should read this discussion in conjunction with our Consolidated Financial Statements and the notes thereto included in Part II, Item 8 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K, as it will help you understand:and our Risk Factors included in Part I, Item 1A of this Annual Report.


OurBusiness Summary and Overview of 2020

Ventas, Inc., an S&P 500 company, and the environment in which we operate;

Our 2017 highlights and other recent developments;

Our critical accounting policies and estimates;

Our results of operations for the last three years;

How we manage our assets and liabilities;

Our liquidity and capital resources;

Our cash flows; and

Our future contractual obligations.

Corporate and Operating Environment

We areis a real estate investment trust (“REIT”) operating at the intersection of healthcare and real estate, with a highly diversified portfolio of seniors housingsenior housing; life science, research and innovation; and healthcare propertiesproperties; which we generally refer to as “healthcare real estate,” located throughout the United States, Canada and the United Kingdom. As of December 31, 2017,2020, we owned more thanor managed through unconsolidated real estate entities approximately 1,200 properties (including properties owned through investments in unconsolidated entities and properties classified as held for sale), consisting of seniorssenior housing communities, medical office buildings (“MOBs”), life science, research and innovation centers, inpatient rehabilitation facilities (“IRFs”) and long-term acute care facilities (“LTACs”), and health systemssystems. Our company was originally founded in 1983 and skilled nursing facilities (“SNFs”), and we had 14 properties under development, including four properties that are owned by unconsolidated real estate entities. We are an S&P 500 companyis headquartered in Chicago, Illinois.Illinois with an additional office in Louisville, Kentucky.


We primarily invest in seniors housing anda diversified portfolio of healthcare propertiesreal estate assets through acquisitions and lease our properties to unaffiliated tenants or operate them through independent third-party managers. As of December 31, 2017, we leased a total of 546 properties (excluding MOBs) to various healthcare operating companies under “triple-net” or “absolute-net” leases that obligate the tenants to pay all property-related expenses, including maintenance, utilities, repairs, taxes, insurance and capital expenditures.

As of December 31, 2017, pursuant to long-term management agreements, we engaged independent operators, such as Atria Senior Living, Inc. (“Atria”) and Sunrise Senior Living, LLC (together with itswholly owned subsidiaries “Sunrise”), to manage 297 seniors housing communities for us.
Our three largest tenants, Brookdale Senior Living, Inc. (together with its subsidiaries, “Brookdale Senior Living”), Ardent Health Partners, LLC (together with its subsidiaries, “Ardent”) and Kindred Healthcare, Inc. (together with its subsidiaries, “Kindred”) leased from us 135 properties (excluding one property managed by Brookdale Senior Living pursuant to a long-term management agreement), 10 properties and 31 properties (excluding one MOB included within our office operations reportable business segment), respectively, as of December 31, 2017.

Through our Lillibridge Healthcare Services, Inc. (“Lillibridge”) subsidiary and our ownership interest in PMB Real Estate Services LLC (“PMBRES”), we also provide MOB management, leasing, marketing, facility development and advisory services to highly rated hospitals and health systems throughout the United States. In addition, from time to time, we make secured and non-mortgage loans and other investments relating to seniors housing and healthcare operators or properties.

co-investment entities. We conduct our operationsoperate through three reportable business segments: triple-net leased properties, senior living operations, which we also refer to as SHOP, and office operations. See “NOTE 19—SEGMENT INFORMATION” of the Notes toour Consolidated Financial Statements and the related notes, including “Note 2 – Accounting Policies” and “Note 19 – Segment Information,” included in Part II, Item 8 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.Report. Our senior housing properties are either operated under triple-net leases in our triple-net leased properties segment or through independent third-party managers in our senior living operations segment.


As of December 31, 2017, our consolidated portfolio included 100% ownership interests in 1,135 properties and controlling joint venture interests in 69 properties, and we had non-controlling ownership interests in 31 properties through investments in unconsolidated entities. Through Lillibridge and PMBRES, we provided management and leasing services to third parties with respect to 105 MOBs as of December 31, 2017.
39



We aim to enhance shareholder value by delivering consistent, superior total returns through a strategy of:by (1) generating reliable and growing cash flows;flows, (2) maintaining a balanced, diversified portfolio of high-quality assets;assets and (3) preserving our financial strength, flexibility and liquidity.


Our ability to access capital in a timely and cost-effective manner is critical to the success of our business strategy because it affects our ability to satisfy existing obligations, including the repayment of maturing indebtedness, and to make future investments. Factors such as general market conditions, interest rates, credit ratings on our securities, expectations of our potential future earnings and cash distributions, and the trading price of our common stock that are beyond our control and fluctuate over time all impact our access to and cost of external capital. For that reason, we generally attempt to match the long-term duration of our investments in real property with long-term financing through the issuance of shares of our common stock or the incurrence of long-term fixed rate debt.


2017COVID-19 Update

During fiscal 2020 and continuing into fiscal 2021, the COVID-19 pandemic has negatively affected our businesses in a number of ways and is expected to continue to do so.

Operating Results.Our senior living operations segment, which we also refer to as SHOP, was significantly impacted by the COVID-19 pandemic. Occupancy decreased over the course of 2020, while operating expenses increased as our senior living communities responded to the pandemic, resulting in a significant decline in NOI compared to 2019. Our NNN senior housing tenants’ performance was similarly affected by COVID-19. During the course of 2020, we modified certain NNN senior housing leases to reset rent and provided other modest financial accommodations to certain NNN senior housing tenants who needed it as a result of COVID-19. We also wrote-off previously accrued straight-line rental income related to NNN senior housing tenants due to COVID-19.

However, we benefited from our ongoing strategy of diversification, with our office and NNN healthcare businesses demonstrating resilience in the face of the pandemic. The Company’s NNN healthcare tenants benefited from significant government financial support that was deployed early and has partially offset the direct financial impact of the pandemic. Our office operations segment, which primarily serves MOB and research and innovation tenants that were less impacted by the pandemic, delivered steady performance throughout the year.

Provider Relief Grants.In the third and fourth quarter of 2020, we applied for grants under Phase 2 and Phase 3 of the Provider Relief Fund administered by the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services (“HHS”) on behalf of the assisted living communities in our senior living operations segment to partially mitigate losses attributable to COVID-19. These grants are intended to reimburse eligible providers for expenses incurred to prevent, prepare for and respond to COVID-19 and lost revenues attributable to COVID-19. Recipients are not required to repay distributions from the Provider Relief Fund, provided that they attest to and comply with certain terms and conditions. See “Government Regulation—Governmental Response to the COVID-19 Pandemic” in Part I, Item 1 of this Annual Report.

During the fourth quarter of 2020, we received $34.3 million and $0.8 million in grants in connection with our Phase 2 and Phase 3 applications, respectively, and recognized these grants within property-level operating expenses in our Consolidated Statements of Income. Subsequent to December 31, 2020, we received $13.6 million in grants in connection with our Phase 3 applications, which we expect to recognize in 2021. While we have received all amounts under our Phase 2 applications and have begun to receive amounts under our Phase 3 applications, there can be no assurance that our remaining applications will be approved or that additional funds will ultimately be received. Any grants that are ultimately received and retained by us are not expected to fully offset the losses incurred in our senior living operating portfolio that are attributable to COVID-19. Further, although we continue to monitor and evaluate the terms and conditions associated with the Provider Relief Fund distributions, we cannot assure you that we will be in compliance with all requirements related to the payments received under the Provider Relief Fund.

Capital Conservation Actions. In response to the COVID-19 pandemic, we took precautionary steps to increase liquidity and preserve financial flexibility in light of the resulting uncertainty.See “—Liquidity and Capital Resources; Recent Capital Conservation Actions.” As of February 16, 2021, we had approximately $3.0 billion in liquidity, including availability under our revolving credit facility and cash and cash equivalents on hand, with no borrowings outstanding under our commercial paper program and negligible near-term debt maturing.

Continuing Impact. The trajectory and future impact of the COVID-19 pandemic remains highly uncertain. The extent of the pandemic’s continuing and ultimate effect on our operational and financial performance will depend on a variety of factors, including the speed at which available vaccines can be successfully deployed; the rate of acceptance of available vaccines, particularly among the residents and staff in our senior housing communities; the impact of new variants of the virus
40


and the effectiveness of available vaccines against those variants; ongoing clinical experience, which may differ considerably across regions and fluctuate over time; and on other future developments, including the ultimate duration, spread and intensity of the outbreak, the availability of testing, the extent to which governments impose, roll-back or re-impose preventative restrictions and the availability of ongoing government financial support to our business, tenants and operators. Due to these uncertainties, we are not able at this time to estimate the ultimate impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on our business, results of operations, financial condition and cash flows.

See “Note 1 - Description of Business - COVID-19 Update” for a description of charges recognized during the year ended December 31, 2020 as a result of the COVID-19 pandemic.

Select 2020 and Early 2021 Highlights

COVID-19 Response

Since the start of the COVID-19 pandemic, in addition to actions described under “COVID-19 Update” above, we have consistently prioritized the health and Other Recent Developmentssafety of employees, residents, tenants and managers, serving as an important resource for information and best practices and leading our industry in testing, including through an early arrangement with Mayo Clinic Laboratories.


We executed on a multi-pronged capital conservation strategy to mitigate the impact of COVID-19, including reducing our planned capital expenditures, reducing capital commitments, establishing a quarterly dividend of $0.45 per share beginning in the second quarter and adjusting the Company’s corporate cost structure.

Ventas Investment Management

We established a third party capital platform, Ventas Investment Management (“VIM”), bringing together our third party capital ventures under one umbrella, including the Ventas Life Science and Healthcare Real Estate Fund, L.P. (the “Ventas Fund”) and our research and innovation (“R&I”) development joint venture with GIC (the “R&I Development JV”) described below. As of December 31, 2020, VIM had over $3 billion in assets under management.

In March 2020, we formed the Ventas Fund, a perpetual life investment vehicle focused on investments in research and innovation centers, medical office buildings and senior housing communities in North America. We are the sponsor and general partner of the Ventas Fund. To seed the Ventas Fund, we contributed six stabilized research and innovation and medical office properties and received cash consideration of $620 million and a 21% interest in the Ventas Fund. In October 2020, the Ventas Fund acquired a portfolio of three life science properties in the South San Francisco life science cluster for $1.0 billion.

In October 2020, we formed the R&I Development JV with GIC. To seed the R&I Development JV, we contributed our controlling interest in four in-progress university-based research and innovation development projects whose total expected cost approximates $930 million.

Investments and Dispositions


In March 2017, we provided secured debt financing to a subsidiary of Ardent to facilitate Ardent’s acquisition of LHP Hospital Group, Inc., which included a $700.0 million term loan and a $60.0 million revolving line of credit feature (of which $28.0 million was outstanding atDuring the year ended December 31, 2017). The LIBOR-based debt financing has a five-year term, a one-year lock out feature2020, we acquired 10 properties for an aggregate consideration of $249.5 million.

During the year ended December 31, 2020, we recognized $262.2 million of gains on sale of real estate including 2020, including $225.1 million for the sale of six properties to the Ventas Fund, $13.7 million for the sale of four in-progress development projects to the R&I Development JV and and $23.4 million for the sale of 31 other properties.

During the year ended December 31, 2020, we received aggregate proceeds of $106.1 million for the full repayment of the principal balances of various loans receivable with a weighted average interest rate of approximately 9.3% as of December 31, 20178.3% that were due to mature between 2020 and is guaranteed by Ardent’s parent company.

During the year ended December 31, 2017, we acquired 15 triple-net leased properties (including six assets previously owned by an equity method investee), four properties reported within our office operations reportable business segment (three life science, research and medical assets and one medical office building) and three seniors housing communities (reported within our senior living operations reportable business segment) for an aggregate purchase price of $691.3 million.


During the year ended December 31, 2017, we sold 53 triple-net leased properties, five MOBs and certain vacant land parcels for aggregate consideration of $870.8 million, and we recognized a gain on the sale of these assets of $717.3 million, net of taxes.

During the year ended December 31, 2017, we received aggregate proceeds of $37.6 million for the partial prepayment and $35.5 million for the full repayment of loans receivable, which resulted2025, resulting in total gains of $0.6$1.4 million.

41



Liquidity Capital and DividendsCapital


As of December 31, 2020, we had approximately $3.3 billion in liquidity, including availability under our revolving credit facility and cash and cash equivalents on hand, with no borrowings outstanding under our commercial paper program and negligible near-term debt maturing.

In March 2017,April 2020, we issued and sold $400.0raised $500.0 million aggregate principal amountthrough the issuance of 3.100%4.75% senior notes due 2023 at a public offering price equal to 99.280% of par, for total proceeds of $397.1 million before the underwriting discount and expenses, and $400.0 million aggregate principal amount of 3.850% senior notes due 2027 at a public offering price equal to 99.196% of par, for total proceeds of $396.8 million before the underwriting discount and expenses.2030.


In April 2017, October 2020,we entered into an unsecured credit facility comprised of a $3.0 billion unsecured revolving credit facility, priced at LIBOR plus 0.875%, that replaced our previous $2.0 billion unsecured revolving credit facility priced at LIBOR plus 1.0%.

In April 2017, we repaid in full, at par, $300.0reduced near-term debt maturities by retiring $236.3 million aggregate principal amount then outstanding of our 1.250%3.25% senior notes due 2017 upon maturity.

In June 2017, we issued and sold C$275.0 million aggregate principal amount of 2.55% senior notes, Series D due 20232022 at a price equal to 99.954%104.14% of par for total proceedsvalue, plus accrued and unpaid interest to the payment date.

During 2020, we sold an aggregate of C$274.9 million before the agent fees and expenses. We used part of the proceeds to repay C$124.4 million on our unsecured term loan due 2019.

In August 2017, we used most of the proceeds from the sale of 22 SNFs to repay the balances then outstanding on the 2018 and 2019 term loans.

In September 2017, we entered into a new $400.0 million secured revolving construction credit facility which matures in 2022 and will be primarily used to finance life science and innovation center and other construction projects.

During the year ended December 31, 2017, we issued and sold 1.11.5 million shares of common stock under our “at-the-market” (“ATM”) equity offering program. Aggregate netprogram for average gross proceeds for these activities were $73.9 million, after sales agent commissions.

During the year ended December 31, 2017, we paid the first three quarterly installments of our 2017 dividend of $0.775$44.88 per share.

In December 2017,January 2021, we declaredentered into an amended and restated unsecured credit facility (the “New Credit Facility”) comprised of a $2.75 billion unsecured revolving credit facility initially priced at LIBOR plus 82.5 basis points.

In February 2021, in order to reduce near-term maturities, we issued a make whole redemption for the fourth quarterentirety of the $400 million outstanding aggregate principal amount of 3.10% senior notes due January 2023. The redemption is expected to settle in March 2021, principally using cash dividend on our common stock of $0.79 per share, which grew by 2% over third quarter 2017 and was paid in January 2018.hand.


Portfolio


The saleIn July 2020, we entered into a revised master lease agreement (the “Brookdale Lease”) and certain other agreements (together with the Brookdale Lease, the “Agreements”) with Brookdale Senior Living.

In April 2020, we completed a transaction with affiliates of the triple-net leased properties above included 36 SNFs, owned by us and operated by Kindred. TheseHoliday Retirement (with its affiliates, collectively, “Holiday”), including entry into a new, terminable management agreement for our 26 independent living assets were sold for aggregate consideration of approximately $700 million and we recognized a gain on the sale of $657.6 million, net of taxes.

Other Recent Developments

In January 2018, we transitioned the management of 76 private pay seniors housing communities to Eclipse Senior Living (“ESL”). These assets, substantially all of whichthat were previously leased by Elmcroft Senior Living (“Elmcroft”), are now operated by ESL undersubject to a management contracttriple-net lease (the “Holiday Lease”) with us. We acquiredHoliday.

Environmental, Social and Governance

During 2020, we continued our leadership in ESG, receiving numerous accolades, including the 2020 Nareit Health Care “Leader in the Light” award for a 34% ownership stakefourth consecutive year, the 2020 Bloomberg Gender-Equality Index for the second consecutive year, the 2020 Dow Jones Sustainability World Index for the second consecutive year and maintaining our industry-leading position in ESL with customary rights and protections. ESL management owns the remaining 66% stake. We also intend to form a new joint venture with an institutional partner related to the assets previously leased by Elmcroft. However, there can be no assurance whether, when or on what terms the joint venture will be completed.GRESB.



Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates


Our Consolidated Financial Statements included in Part II, Item 8 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K have been prepared in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (“GAAP”) set forth in the Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”), as published by the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”). GAAP requires us to make estimates and assumptions regarding future events that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities, the disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting periods. We base these estimates on our experience and assumptions we believe to be reasonable under the circumstances. However, if our judgment or interpretation of the facts and circumstances relating to various transactions or other matters had been different, we may have applied a different accounting treatment, resulting in a different presentation of our financial statements. We periodically reevaluate our estimates and assumptions, and in the event they prove to be different from actual results, we make adjustments in subsequent periods to reflect more current estimates and assumptions about matters that are inherently uncertain. We believe that the critical accounting policies described below, among others, affect our more significant estimates and judgments used in the preparation of our financial statements. For more information regarding our critical accounting policies, see “NOTE 2—ACCOUNTING POLICIES”“Note 2 – Accounting Policies” of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements included in Part II, Item 8 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.Report.


42


Principles of Consolidation


The Consolidated Financial Statements included in Part II, Item 8 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K include our accounts and the accounts of our wholly owned subsidiaries and the joint venture entities over which we exercise control. All intercompany transactions and balances have been eliminated in consolidation, and our net earnings are reduced by the portion of net earnings attributable to noncontrolling interests.


GAAP requires us to identify entities for which control is achieved through means other than voting rights and to determine which business enterprise is the primary beneficiary of variable interest entities (“VIEs”). A VIE is broadly defined as an entity with one or more of the following characteristics: (a) the total equity investment at risk is insufficient to finance the entity’s activities without additional subordinated financial support; (b) as a group, the holders of the equity investment at risk lack (i) the ability to make decisions about the entity’s activities through voting or similar rights, (ii) the obligation to absorb the expected losses of the entity, or (iii) the right to receive the expected residual returns of the entity; and (c) the equity investors have voting rights that are not proportional to their economic interests, and substantially all of the entity’s activities either involve, or are conducted on behalf of, an investor that has disproportionately few voting rights. We consolidate our investment in a VIE when we determine that we are its primary beneficiary. We may change our original assessment of a VIE upon subsequent events such as the modification of contractual arrangements that affects the characteristics or adequacy of the entity’s equity investments at risk and the disposition of all or a portion of an interest held by the primary beneficiary.


We identify the primary beneficiary of a VIE as the enterprise that has both: (i) the power to direct the activities of the VIE that most significantly impact the entity’s economic performance; and (ii) the obligation to absorb losses or the right to receive benefits of the VIE that could be significant to the entity. We perform this analysis on an ongoing basis.


As it relates to investments in joint ventures, GAAP may preclude consolidation by the sole general partner in certain circumstances based on the type of rights held by the limited partner(s). We assess limited partners’ rights and their impact on our consolidation conclusions, and we reassess if there is a change to the terms or in the exercisability of the rights of the limited partners, the sole general partner increases or decreases its ownership of limited partnership interests, or there is an increase or decrease in the number of outstanding limited partnership interests. We also apply this guidance to managing member interests in limited liability companies.

We consolidate several VIEs that share the following common characteristics:

the VIE is in the legal form of an LP or LLC;
the VIE was designed to own and manage its underlying real estate investments;
we are the general partner or managing member of the VIE;
we own a majority of the voting interests in the VIE;
a minority of voting interests in the VIE are owned by external third parties, unrelated to us;
the minority owners do not have substantive kick-out or participating rights in the VIE; and
we are the primary beneficiary of the VIE.

We have separately identified certain special purpose entities that were established to allow investments in life science projects by tax credit investors (“TCIs”). We have determined that these special purpose entities are VIEs and that we are the

primary beneficiary of the VIEs, and therefore we consolidate these special purpose entities. Our primary beneficiary determination is based upon several factors, including but not limited to the rights we have in directing the activities which most significantly impact the VIEs’ economic performance as well as certain guarantees which protect the TCIs from losses should a tax credit recapture event occur.

Accounting for Real Estate Acquisitions


On January 1, 2017,When we adopted Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) 2017-01, Clarifying the Definition of a Business (“ASU 2017-01”) which narrows the FASB’s definition of a business and provides a framework that gives entities a basis for makingacquire real estate, we first make reasonable judgments about whether athe transaction involves an asset or a business. ASU 2017-01 states that whenOur real estate acquisitions are generally accounted for as asset acquisitions as substantially all of the fair value of the gross assets acquired is concentrated in a single identifiable asset or group of similar identifiable assets, the acquired asset is not a business. If this initial test is not met, an acquired asset cannot be considered a business unless it includes an input and a substantive process that together significantly contribute to the ability to create output. The primary differences between business combinations and asset acquisitions include recognition of goodwill at the acquisition date and expense recognition for transaction costs as incurred. We are applying ASU 2017-01 prospectively for acquisitions after January 1, 2017.

assets. Regardless of whether an acquisition is considered a business combination or an asset acquisition, we record the cost of the businesses or assets acquired as tangible and intangible assets and liabilities based upon their estimated fair values as of the acquisition date. Intangibles primarily include the value of in-place leases and acquired lease contracts.


We estimate the fair value of buildings acquired on an as-if-vacant basis or replacement cost basis and depreciate the building value over the estimated remaining life of the building, generally not to exceed 35 years. We determine the fair value of other fixed assets, such as site improvements and furniture, fixtures and equipment, based upon the replacement cost and depreciate such value over the assets’ estimated remaining useful lives as determined at the applicable acquisition date. We determine the value of land either by considering the sales prices of similar properties in recent transactions or based on internal analyses of recently acquired and existing comparable properties within our portfolio. We generally determine the value of construction in progress based upon the replacement cost. However, for certain acquired properties that are part of a ground-up development, we determine fair value by using the same valuation approach as for all other properties and deducting the estimated cost to complete the development. During the remaining construction period, we capitalize project costs until the development has reached substantial completion. Construction in progress, including capitalized interest, is not depreciated until the development has reached substantial completion.


Intangibles primarily include the value of in-place leases and acquired lease contracts. We include all lease-related intangible assets and liabilities within acquired lease intangibles and accounts payable and other liabilities, respectively, on our Consolidated Balance Sheets.

The fair value of acquired lease-related intangibles, if any, reflects: (i) the estimated value of any above and/or below market leases, determined by discounting the difference between the estimated market rent and in-place lease rent; and (ii) the estimated value of in-place leases related to the cost to obtain tenants, including leasing commissions, and an estimated value of the absorption period to reflect the value of the rent and recovery costs foregone during a reasonable lease-up period as if the acquired space was vacant. We amortize any acquired lease-related intangibles to revenue or amortization expense over the remaining life of the associated lease plus any assumed bargain renewal periods. If a lease is terminated prior to its stated expiration or not renewed upon expiration, we recognize all unamortized amounts of lease-related intangibles associated with that lease in operations at that time.over the shortened lease term.


We estimate the fair value of purchase option intangible assets and liabilities, if any, by discounting the difference between the applicable property’s acquisition date fair value and an estimate of its future option price. We do not amortize the resulting intangible asset or liability over the term of the lease, but rather adjust the recognized value of the asset or liability
43


upon sale.


We estimate the fair value of tenant or other customer relationships acquired, if any, by considering the nature and extent of existing relationships with the tenant or customer, growth prospects for developing new business with the tenant or customer, the tenant’s credit quality, expectations of lease renewals with the tenant, and the potential for significant, additional future leasing arrangements with the tenant, and we amortize that value over the expected life of the associated arrangements or leases, including the remaining terms of the related leases and any expected renewal periods. We estimate the fair value of trade names and trademarks using a royalty rate methodology and amortize that value over the estimated useful life of the trade name or trademark.

In connection with an acquisition, we may assume rights and obligations under certain lease agreements pursuant to which we become the lessee of a given property. We generally assume the lease classification previously determined by the prior lessee absent a modification in the assumed lease agreement. We assess assumed operating leases, including ground leases, to determine whether the lease terms are favorable or unfavorable to us given current market conditions on the

acquisition date. To the extent the lease terms are favorable or unfavorable to us relative to market conditions on the acquisition date, we recognize an intangible asset or liability at fair value and amortize that asset or liability to interest or rental expense in our Consolidated Statements of Income over the applicable lease term. We include all lease-related intangibleWhere we are the lessee, we record the acquisition date values of leases, including any above or below market value, within operating lease assets and liabilities within acquiredoperating lease intangibles and accounts payable and other liabilities respectively, on our Consolidated Balance Sheets.


We determine the fair value of loans receivable acquired by discounting the estimated future cash flows using current interest rates at which similar loans with the same terms and length to maturity would be made to borrowers with similar credit ratings. We do not establish a valuation allowance at the acquisition date because the estimated future cash flows already reflect our judgment regarding their uncertainty. We recognize the difference between the acquisition date fair value and the total expected cash flows as interest income using an effective interest method over the life of the applicable loan. Subsequent to the acquisition date, we evaluate changes regarding the uncertainty of future cash flows and the need for a valuation allowance, as appropriate.

We estimate the fair value of noncontrolling interests assumed consistent with the manner in which we value all of the underlying assets and liabilities.


We calculate the fair value of long-term assumed debt by discounting the remaining contractual cash flows on each instrument at the current market rate for those borrowings, which we approximate based on the rate at which we would expect to incur a replacement instrument on the date of acquisition, and recognize any fair value adjustments related to long-term debt as effective yield adjustments over the remaining term of the instrument.


Impairment of Long-Lived and Intangible Assets


We periodically evaluate our long-lived assets, primarily consisting of investments in real estate, for impairment indicators. If indicators of impairment are present, we evaluate the carrying value of the related real estate investments in relation to the future undiscounted cash flows of the underlying operations. In performing this evaluation, we consider market conditions and our current intentions with respect to holding or disposing of the asset. We adjust the net book value of leasedreal estate properties and other long-lived assets to fair value if the sum of the expected future undiscounted cash flows, including sales proceeds, is less than book value. We recognize an impairment loss at the time we make any such determination.


Estimates of fair value used in our evaluation of investments in real estate are based upon discounted future cash flow projections, if necessary, or other acceptable valuation techniques that are based, in turn, upon all available evidence including level three inputs, such as revenue and expense growth rates, estimates of future cash flows, capitalization rates, discount rates, general economic conditions and trends, or other available market data such as replacement cost or comparable transactions. Our ability to accurately predict future operating results and cash flows and to estimate and determine fair values impacts the timing and recognition of impairments. While we believe our assumptions are reasonable, changes in these assumptions may have a material impact on our financial results.

Revenue Recognition

We recognize rental revenues under our leases on a straight-line basis over the applicable lease term when collectability of substantially all rents is probable. We assess the probability of collecting substantially all rents under our leases based on several factors, including, among other things, payment history, the financial strength of the tenant and any guarantors, the historical operations and operating trends of the property, the historical payment pattern of the tenant, the type of property, the value of the underlying collateral, if any, expected future performance of the property and current economic conditions. If our evaluation of these factors indicates it is not probable that we will be able to collect substantially all rents under the lease, we record a charge to rental income. If we change our conclusions regarding the probability of collecting rent payments required by a lease, we may recognize adjustments to rental income in the period we make such change in our conclusions.
Federal Income Tax

We have elected to be treated as a REIT under the applicable provisions of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the “Code”), for every year beginning with the year ended December 31, 1999. Accordingly, we generally are not subject to federal income tax on net income that we distribute to our stockholders, provided that we continue to qualify as a REIT. However, with respect to certain of our subsidiaries that have elected to be treated as taxable REIT subsidiaries (“TRS” or “TRS entities”), we record income tax expense or benefit, as those entities are subject to federal income tax similar to regular corporations. Certain foreign subsidiaries are subject to foreign income tax, although they did not elect to be treated as TRSs.

44


We account for deferred income taxes using the asset and liability method and recognize deferred tax assets and liabilities for the expected future tax consequences of events that have been included in our financial statements or tax returns. Under this method, we determine deferred tax assets and liabilities based on the differences between the financial reporting and tax bases of assets and liabilities using enacted tax rates in effect for the year in which the differences are expected to reverse. Any increase or decrease in the deferred tax liability that results from a change in circumstances, and that causes us to change our judgment about expected future tax consequences of events, is included in the tax provision when such changes occur. Deferred income taxes also reflect the impact of operating loss and tax credit carryforwards. A valuation allowance is provided if we believe it is more likely than not that all or some portion of the deferred tax asset will not be realized. Any increase or decrease in the valuation allowance that results from a change in circumstances, and that causes us to change our judgment about the realizability of the related deferred tax asset, is included in the tax provision when such changes occur.

We recognize the tax benefit from an uncertain tax position claimed or expected to be claimed on a tax return only if it is more likely than not that the tax position will be sustained on examination by taxing authorities, based on the technical merits of the position. The tax benefits recognized in the financial statements from such a position are measured based on the largest benefit that has a greater than fifty percent likelihood of being realized upon ultimate settlement. We recognize interest and penalties, if applicable, related to uncertain tax positions as part of income tax benefit or expense.

Recently Issued or Adopted Accounting Standards

We adopted ASC Topic 842, Leases (“ASC 842”) on January 1, 2019, which introduced a lessee model that brings most leases on the balance sheet and, among other changes, eliminates the requirement in current GAAP for an entity to use bright-line tests in determining lease classification.

ASC 842 allows for several practical expedients which permit the following: no reassessment of lease classification or initial direct costs; use of the standard’s effective date as the date of initial application; and no separation of non-lease components from the related lease components and, instead, to account for those components as a single lease component if certain criteria are met. We elected these practical expedients using the effective date as our date of initial application. Therefore, financial information and disclosures under ASC 842 are not provided for periods prior to January 1, 2019.

Upon adoption, we recognized both right of use assets and lease liabilities for leases in which we lease land, real property or other equipment. We now also report revenues and expenses within our triple-net leased properties reportable business segment for real estate taxes and insurance that are escrowed and obligations of the tenants in accordance with their respective leases with us. This reporting had no impact on our net income. Resident leases within our senior living operations reportable business segment and office leases also contain service elements. We elected the practical expedient to account for our resident and office leases as a single lease component. Also, we now expense certain leasing costs, other than leasing commissions, as they are incurred. Prior to the adoption of ASC 842, GAAP provided for the deferral and amortization of such costs over the applicable lease term. We are continuing to amortize any unamortized deferred lease costs as of December 31, 2018 over their respective lease terms.

As of January 1, 2019 we recognized operating lease assets of $361.7 million on our Consolidated Balance Sheets which includes the present value of minimum lease payments as well as certain existing above and/or below market lease intangible values associated with such leases. Also upon adoption, we recognized operating lease liabilities of $216.9 million on our Consolidated Balance Sheets. The present value of minimum lease payments was calculated on each lease using a discount rate that approximates our incremental borrowing rate primarily adjusted for the length of the individual lease terms. As of the January 1, 2019 adoption date, we utilized discount rates ranging from 6.15% to 7.60% for our ground leases.
Upon adoption, we recognized a cumulative effect adjustment to retained earnings of $0.6 million primarily relating to certain costs associated with unexecuted leases that were deferred as of December 31, 2018.

45


Results of Operations

As of December 31, 2020, we operated through three reportable business segments: triple-net leased properties, senior living operations and office operations. In our triple-net leased properties segment, we invest in and own senior housing and healthcare properties throughout the United States and the United Kingdom and lease those properties to healthcare operating companies under “triple-net” or “absolute-net” leases that obligate the tenants to pay all property-related expenses. In our senior living operations segment, we invest in senior housing communities throughout the United States and Canada and engage independent operators, such as Atria and Sunrise, to manage those communities. In our office operations segment, we primarily acquire, own, develop, lease and manage MOBs and research and innovation centers throughout the United States. Information provided for “all other” includes income from loans and investments and other miscellaneous income and various corporate-level expenses not directly attributable to any of our three reportable business segments. Assets included in “all other” consist primarily of corporate assets, including cash, restricted cash, loans receivable and investments, and miscellaneous accounts receivable.

Our chief operating decision makers evaluate performance of the combined properties in each reportable business segment and determine how to allocate resources to those segments, in significant part, based on segment net operating income (“NOI”) and related measures. In addition to the information presented below, see “Note 19 – Segment Information” of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements included in Part II, Item 8 of this Annual Report for further information regarding our business segments and a discussion of our definition of segment NOI. See “Non-GAAP Financial Measures” included elsewhere in this Annual Report for additional disclosure and reconciliations of net income attributable to common stockholders, as computed in accordance with GAAP, to NOI.

46


Years Ended December 31, 2020 and 2019

The table below shows our results of operations for the years ended December 31, 2020 and 2019 and the effect of changes in those results from period to period on our net income attributable to common stockholders.
 For the Years Ended
December 31,
(Decrease) Increase to Net Income
 20202019$%
 (Dollars in thousands)
Segment NOI:    
Triple-net leased properties$673,105 $754,337 $(81,232)(10.8 %)
Senior living operations538,489 630,135 (91,646)(14.5)
Office operations549,375 574,157 (24,782)(4.3)
All other87,021 92,610 (5,589)(6.0)
Total segment NOI1,847,990 2,051,239 (203,249)(9.9)
Interest and other income7,609 10,984 (3,375)(30.7)
Interest expense(469,541)(451,662)(17,879)(4.0)
Depreciation and amortization(1,109,763)(1,045,620)(64,143)(6.1)
General, administrative and professional fees(130,158)(158,726)28,568 18.0 
Loss on extinguishment of debt, net(10,791)(41,900)31,109 74.2 
Merger-related expenses and deal costs(29,812)(15,235)(14,577)(95.7)
Allowance on loans receivable and investments(24,238)— (24,238)nm
Other(707)10,339 (11,046)nm
Income before unconsolidated entities, real estate dispositions, income taxes, discontinued operations and noncontrolling interests80,589 359,419 (278,830)(77.6)
Income (loss) from unconsolidated entities1,844 (2,454)4,298 nm
Gain on real estate dispositions262,218 26,022 236,196 nm
Income tax benefit96,534 56,310 40,224 71.4 
Income from continuing operations441,185 439,297 1,888 0.4 
Discontinued operations— — — nm
Net income441,185 439,297 1,888 0.4 
Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests2,036 6,281 4,245 67.6 
Net income attributable to common stockholders$439,149 $433,016 6,133 1.4 
nm—not meaningful

Segment NOI—Triple-Net Leased Properties

The following table summarizes results of operations in our triple-net leased properties reportable business segment, including assets sold or classified as held for sale as of December 31, 2020, but excluding assets whose operations were classified as discontinued operations:
 For the Years Ended
December 31,
(Decrease) Increase to Segment NOI
 20202019$%
 (Dollars in thousands)
Segment NOI—Triple-Net Leased Properties:    
Rental income$695,265 $780,898 $(85,633)(11.0 %)
Less: Property-level operating expenses(22,160)(26,561)4,401 16.6 
Segment NOI$673,105 $754,337 (81,232)(10.8)
nm—not meaningful
47



In our triple-net leased properties reportable business segment, our revenues generally consist of fixed rental amounts (subject to contractual escalations) received from our tenants in accordance with the applicable lease terms. We report revenues and property-level operating expenses within our triple-net leased properties reportable business segment for real estate tax and insurance expenses that are paid from escrows collected from our tenants.

The Triple-net leased properties segment NOI decrease in 2020 over the prior year is attributable primarily to the transition of 26 independent living assets at the start of the second quarter 2020 operated by Holiday from our triple-net portfolio to our senior housing operating portfolio, lower rental income from the Brookdale lease modification at the start of the third quarter of 2020, and the COVID-19 related write-off of previously accrued straight-line rental income during 2020 of $67.6 million (non-Holiday assets), partially offset by the $50.2 million impact of terminating the Holiday Lease. We will continue to try to collect rent on a contractual basis for the tenants where straight-line rent has been written off, but we have determined that collectability is not probable due to COVID-19.

Occupancy rates may affect the profitability of our tenants’ operations. The following table sets forth average continuing occupancy rates related to the triple-net leased properties we owned at December 31, 2020 and measured over the trailing 12 months ended September 30, 2020 (which is the most recent information available to us from our tenants) and average continuing occupancy rates related to the triple-net leased properties we owned at December 31, 2019 and measured over the 12 months ended September 30, 2019. The table excludes non-stabilized properties, properties owned through investments in unconsolidated real estate entities, certain properties for which we do not receive occupancy information and properties acquired or properties that transitioned operators for which we do not have a full four quarters of occupancy results.

Number of Properties at December 31, 2020Average Occupancy for the Trailing 12 Months Ended September 30, 2020Number of Properties at December 31, 2019Average Occupancy for the Trailing 12 Months Ended September 30, 2019
Senior housing communities290 82.1 %326 86.0 %
Skilled nursing facilities (“SNFs”)16 82.9 16 87.3 
IRFs and LTACs35 55.7 36 53.6 

Declines in occupancy are primarily the result of COVID-19 impacts to senior housing and SNF operations.     

The following table compares results of operations for our 359 same-store triple-net leased properties. See “Non-GAAP Financial MeasuresNOI” included elsewhere in this Annual Report on Form 10-K for additional disclosure regarding same-store NOI for each of our reportable business segments.
 For the Years Ended
December 31,
(Decrease) Increase to Segment NOI
 20202019$%
 (Dollars in thousands)
Same-Store Segment NOI—Triple-Net Leased Properties:    
Rental income$601,195 $669,510 $(68,315)(10.2 %)
Less: Property-level operating expenses(19,166)(19,198)32 0.2 
Segment NOI$582,029 $650,312 (68,283)(10.5)
nm—not meaningful

The decrease in our same-store triple-net leased properties rental income in 2020 over the prior year is attributable primarily to the COVID-19 related write-off of previously accrued straight-line rental income of $67.6 million during 2020 and lower rental income from the Brookdale lease modification at the start of the third quarter of 2020, partially offset by rent increases due to contractual escalations pursuant to the terms of our leases. We will continue to try to collect rent on a contractual basis for the tenants where straight-line rent has been written off, but we have determined that collectability is not probable due to COVID-19.

48


Segment NOI—Senior Living Operations

The following table summarizes results of operations in our senior living operations reportable business segment, including assets sold or classified as held for sale as of December 31, 2020.
 For the Years Ended
December 31,
Increase (Decrease) to Segment NOI
 20202019$%
 (Dollars in thousands)
Segment NOI—Senior Living Operations:    
Resident fees and services$2,197,160 $2,151,533 $45,627 2.1 %
Less: Property-level operating expenses(1,658,671)(1,521,398)(137,273)(9.0)
Segment NOI$538,489 $630,135 (91,646)(14.5)

 Number of
Properties at
December 31,
Average Unit
Occupancy
for the Years Ended
December 31,
Average Monthly Revenue Per Occupied Room for
the Years Ended
December 31,
 202020192020201920202019
Total communities432 401 81.7 %86.6 %$4,766 $5,451 
Resident fees and services include all amounts earned from residents at our senior housing communities, such as rental fees related to resident leases, extended healthcare fees and other ancillary service income. Property-level operating expenses related to our senior living operations segment include labor, food, utilities, marketing, management and other costs of operating the properties.

The decrease in our senior living operations segment NOI in 2020 over the prior year is primarily attributable to lower occupancy resulting from the COVID-19 pandemic. In addition, NOI has been negatively impacted by increased operating costs as a result of the COVID-19 pandemic, which is partially offset by the receipt of $35.1 million in grants during the fourth quarter 2020 from HHS under the Provider Relief Fund. We also had more properties in this segment because of the transition of 26 independent living assets at the start of the second quarter 2020 operated by Holiday from our triple-net portfolio to our senior housing operating portfolio and the third quarter 2019 acquisition of 34 Canadian senior housing communities via an equity partnership with Le Groupe Maurice, which contributed to NOI.

The following table compares results of operations for our 335 same-store senior living operating communities.
 For the Years Ended
December 31,
(Decrease) Increase to Segment NOI
 20202019$%
 (Dollars in thousands)
Same-Store Segment NOI—Senior Living Operations:    
Resident fees and services$1,796,135 $1,967,402 $(171,267)(8.7 %)
Less: Property-level operating expenses(1,385,316)(1,376,587)(8,729)(0.6)
Segment NOI$410,819 $590,815 (179,996)(30.5)

nm—not meaningful
 Number of
Properties at
December 31,
Average Unit
Occupancy
for the Years Ended
December 31,
Average Monthly Revenue Per Occupied Room for
the Years Ended
December 31,
 202020192020201920202019
Same-store communities335 335 79.6 %86.9 %$5,765 $5,790 

49


The decrease in our same-store senior living operations segment NOI is primarily attributable to lower occupancy resulting from the COVID-19 pandemic. In addition, NOI has been negatively impacted by increased operating costs as a result of the COVID-19 pandemic, which is partially offset by the receipt of $31.9 million in grants from HHS under the Provider Relief Fund.
Segment NOI—Office Operations

The following table summarizes results of operations in our office operations reportable business segment, including assets sold or classified as held for sale as of December 31, 2020.
 For the Years Ended
December 31,
(Decrease) Increase to Segment NOI
 20202019$%
 (Dollars in thousands)
Segment NOI—Office Operations:    
Rental income$799,627 $828,978 $(29,351)(3.5 %)
Office building services revenue8,675 7,747 928 12.0 
Total revenues808,302 836,725 (28,423)(3.4)
Less:    
Property-level operating expenses(256,612)(260,249)3,637 1.4 
Office building services costs(2,315)(2,319)0.2 
Segment NOI$549,375 $574,157 (24,782)(4.3)
 Number of
Properties at
December 31,
Occupancy at
December 31,
Annualized Average Rent Per Occupied Square Foot for the Years Ended December 31,
 202020192020201920202019
Total office buildings374 382 89.7 %90.3 %$34 $34 
The decrease in our office operations segment NOI in 2020 over the prior year is attributable to assets sold to the Ventas Fund in the first quarter of 2020, lease termination fees received in 2019, and COVID-19 impacts including the write-off of previously accrued straight-line rental income during 2020 and reduced parking revenues. These reduction in NOI were partially offset by active leasing at recently developed and redeveloped properties, improved tenant retention, contractual rent escalators, acquisitions and business interruption insurance proceeds.

The following table compares results of operations for our 355 same-store office buildings.
 For the Years Ended
December 31,
Increase (Decrease) to Segment NOI
 20202019$%
 (Dollars in thousands)
Same-Store Segment NOI—Office Operations:    
Rental income$743,563 $733,482 $10,081 1.4 %
Less: Property-level operating expenses(235,789)(231,946)(3,843)(1.7)
Segment NOI$507,774 $501,536 6,238 1.2 
 Number of
Properties at
December 31,
Occupancy at
December 31,
Annualized Average Rent Per Occupied Square Foot for the Years Ended December 31,
 202020192020201920202019
Same-store office buildings355 355 91.3 %92.2 %$34 $33 
The increase in our same-store office operations segment NOI in 2020 over the prior year is attributable primarily to successful leasing, enhanced tenant retention, continued strong collections through the COVID-19 pandemic and contractual rent escalations.
50



All Other

Information provided for all other segment NOI includes income from loans and investments and other miscellaneous income not directly attributable to any of our three reportable business segments. The $5.6 million decrease in all other segment NOI in 2020 over the prior year is primarily due to reduced interest income from our loans receivable investments from lower LIBOR-based interest rates, repayments of loans outstanding net of new issuances, partially offset by increased management fee revenues from investments in unconsolidated real estate entities. See “Note 6 – Loans Receivable and Investments” of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements included in Part II, Item 8 of this Annual Report.

Interest and Other Income

The $3.4 million decrease in interest and other income in 2020 over the prior year is primarily due to 2019 income from the exercise of warrants related to our research and innovation properties, partially offset by a 2020 reduction of a liability related to an acquisition and interest income on short-term investments.

Interest Expense

The $17.9 million increase in total interest expense in 2020 over the prior year is primarily attributable to an increase of $53.0 million due to higher debt balances, partially offset by a decrease of $35.5 million due to a lower effective interest rate. Our weighted average effective interest rate was 3.5% for 2020, compared to 3.8% for 2019. Capitalized interest for 2020 and 2019 was $9.6 million and $9.0 million, respectively.

Depreciation and Amortization

Depreciation and amortization expense increased during 2020 compared to 2019, primarily due to an increase in real estate impairments during 2020 and asset acquisitions, including the 2019 acquisition of senior housing communities operated by LGM. This is partially offset by the impact of dispositions during 2020. See “Note 1 – Description of Business - COVID-19 Update” for information regarding 2020 real estate impairment charges.

General, Administrative and Professional Fees

The $28.6 million decrease in general, administrative and professional fees in 2020 over the prior year is primarily a result of the capital conservation actions taken during 2020, including the June 2020 elimination of approximately 25% of corporate positions and a reduction in executives’ salaries for the second half of 2020. See “2020 Capital Conservation Actions” for information regarding these measures.

Loss on Extinguishment of Debt, Net

The loss on extinguishment of debt, net in 2020 is due primarily to the notice of redemption of $236.3 million of our 3.25% senior notes due 2022. The loss on extinguishment of debt, net in 2019 was due primarily to the redemption and repayment of $600.0 million aggregate principal amounts then outstanding of our 4.25% senior notes due 2022. See “—Liquidity and Capital Resources”.

Merger-Related Expenses and Deal Costs

The $14.6 million increase in merger-related expenses and deal costs in 2020 over the prior year is due primarily to costs incurred as a result of the Brookdale transaction and 2020 expenses related to severance and operator transitions.

Allowance on Loans Receivable and Investments

The allowance on loans receivable and investments in 2020 is due to credit losses on certain of our non-mortgage loans receivable and government-sponsored pooled loan investments, less recoveries received during the year. See “Note 1 – Description of Business - COVID-19 Update” for more information regarding these allowances.

51


Other

The $11.0 million change in other from income in 2019 to an expense in 2020 is primarily due to insurance recoveries received in 2019 and increased corporate-level insurance costs in 2020, partially offset by the change in fair value of stock warrants received in connection with the Brookdale transaction.

Income (Loss) from Unconsolidated Entities

The $4.3 million increase in income (loss) from unconsolidated entities for 2020 over 2019 is primarily due to our share of financial results from our unconsolidated entities in 2020, offset by an impairment of our investment in an unconsolidated operating entity in 2020. See “Note 1 – Description of Business - COVID-19 Update” for information regarding 2020 impairment charges.

Gain on Real Estate Dispositions

The $236.2 million increase in gain on real estate dispositions for 2020 over 2019 is due primarily to our contribution of six properties to the Ventas Fund in 2020.

Income Tax Benefit

The $40.2 million increase in income tax benefit related to continuing operations for 2020 over 2019 is primarily due to a $152.9 million deferred tax benefit related to the internal restructuring of certain U.S. taxable REIT subsidiaries completed within the first quarter of 2020, partially offset by changes in the valuation allowance against deferred tax assets of certain of our TRS entities. The restructuring benefit resulted from the transfer of assets subject to certain deferred tax liabilities from taxable REIT subsidiaries to the entities other than the TRS entities in this tax-free transaction.
Years Ended December 31, 2019 and 2018

Our Annual Report for the year ended December 31, 2019, filed with the SEC on February 24, 2020, contains information regarding our results of operations for the years ended December 31, 2019 and 2018 and the effect of changes in those results from period to period on our net income attributable to common stockholders.

Non-GAAP Financial Measures

We consider certain non-GAAP financial measures to be useful supplemental measures of our operating performance. A non-GAAP financial measure is a measure of historical or future financial performance, financial position or cash flows that excludes or includes amounts that are not so excluded from or included in the most directly comparable measure calculated and presented in accordance with GAAP. Described below are the non-GAAP financial measures used by management to evaluate our operating performance and that we consider most useful to investors, together with reconciliations of these measures to the most directly comparable GAAP measures.

The non-GAAP financial measures we present in this Annual Report may not be comparable to those presented by other real estate companies due to the fact that not all real estate companies use the same definitions. You should not consider these measures as alternatives to net income attributable to common stockholders (determined in accordance with GAAP) as indicators of our financial performance or as alternatives to cash flow from operating activities (determined in accordance with GAAP) as measures of our liquidity, nor are these measures necessarily indicative of sufficient cash flow to fund all of our needs. In order to facilitate a clear understanding of our consolidated historical operating results, you should examine these measures in conjunction with net income attributable to common stockholders as presented in our Consolidated Financial Statements and other financial data included elsewhere in this Annual Report.
52



Funds From Operations and Normalized Funds From Operations Attributable to Common Stockholders

Historical cost accounting for real estate assets implicitly assumes that the value of real estate assets diminishes predictably over time. However, since real estate values historically have risen or fallen with market conditions, many industry investors deem presentations of operating results for real estate companies that use historical cost accounting to be insufficient by themselves. For that reason, we consider Funds From Operations attributable to common stockholders (“FFO”) and normalized FFO to be appropriate supplemental measures of operating performance of an equity REIT. In particular, we believe that normalized FFO is useful because it allows investors, analysts and our management to compare our operating performance to the operating performance of other real estate companies and between periods on a consistent basis without having to account for differences caused by non-recurring items and other non-operational events such as transactions and litigation. In some cases, we provide information about identified non-cash components of FFO and normalized FFO because it allows investors, analysts and our management to assess the impact of those items on our financial results.

We use the National Association of Real Estate Investment Trusts (“Nareit”) definition of FFO. Nareit defines FFO as net income attributable to common stockholders (computed in accordance with GAAP), excluding gains or losses from sales of real estate property, including gains or losses on remeasurement of equity method investments, and impairment write-downs of depreciable real estate, plus real estate depreciation and amortization, and after adjustments for unconsolidated partnerships and entities. Adjustments for unconsolidated partnerships and entities will be calculated to reflect FFO on the same basis. We define normalized FFO as FFO excluding the following income and expense items (which may be recurring in nature): (a) merger-related costs and expenses, including amortization of intangibles, transition and integration expenses, and deal costs and expenses, including expenses and recoveries relating to acquisition lawsuits; (b) the impact of any expenses related to asset impairment and valuation allowances, the write-off of unamortized deferred financing fees, or additional costs, expenses, discounts, make-whole payments, penalties or premiums incurred as a result of early retirement or payment of our debt; (c) the non-cash effect of income tax benefits or expenses, the non-cash impact of changes to our executive equity compensation plan, derivative transactions that have non-cash mark to market impacts on our Consolidated Statements of Income and non-cash charges related to leases; (d) the financial impact of contingent consideration, severance-related costs and charitable donations made to the Ventas Charitable Foundation; (e) gains and losses for non-operational foreign currency hedge agreements and changes in the fair value of financial instruments; (f) gains and losses on non-real estate dispositions and other unusual items related to unconsolidated entities; (g) expenses related to the reaudit and re-review in 2014 of our historical financial statements and related matters; (h) net expenses or recoveries related to natural disasters; and (i) any other incremental items set forth in the normalized FFO reconciliation included herein.    

The following table summarizes our FFO and normalized FFO for each of the five years ended December 31, 2020. The decrease in normalized FFO for the year ended December 31, 2020 over the prior year is due to the impact of COVID-19 on our senior housing business and increases in interest expense from incremental borrowings arising as a consequence of the impact of COVID-19, partially offset by the positive impact of our third quarter 2019 acquisition of an interest in 34 Canadian senior housing communities via an equity partnership with Le Groupe Maurice.
53


 For the Years Ended December 31,
 20202019201820172016
 (In thousands)
Net income attributable to common stockholders$439,149 $433,016 $409,467 $1,356,470 $649,231 
Adjustments:     
Real estate depreciation and amortization1,104,114 1,039,550 913,537 881,088 891,985 
Real estate depreciation related to noncontrolling interests(16,767)(9,762)(6,926)(7,565)(7,785)
Real estate depreciation related to unconsolidated entities4,986 187 1,977 4,231 5,754 
Gain on real estate dispositions related to unconsolidated entities— (1,263)(875)(1,057)(439)
Gain on re-measurement of equity interest upon acquisition, net— — — (3,027)— 
Impairment on equity method investment— — 35,708 — — 
(Loss) gain on real estate dispositions related to noncontrolling interests(9)343 1,508 18 — 
Gain on real estate dispositions(262,218)(26,022)(46,247)(717,273)(98,203)
Discontinued operations:   
Loss on real estate dispositions— — — — 
FFO attributable to common stockholders1,269,255 1,436,049 1,308,149 1,512,885 1,440,544 
Adjustments:     
Change in fair value of financial instruments(21,928)(78)(18)(41)62 
Non-cash income tax benefit(98,114)(58,918)(18,427)(22,387)(34,227)
Effect of the 2017 Tax Act— — (24,618)(36,539)— 
Loss on extinguishment of debt, net10,791 41,900 63,073 839 2,779 
Gain on non-real estate dispositions related to unconsolidated entities(597)(18)(2)(39)(557)
Merger-related expenses, deal costs and re-audit costs34,690 18,208 38,145 14,823 28,290 
Amortization of other intangibles472 484 759 1,458 1,752 
Other items related to unconsolidated entities(614)3,291 5,035 3,188 — 
Non-cash impact of changes to equity plan(452)7,812 4,830 5,453 — 
Non-cash charges related to lease terminations— — 21,299 — — 
Natural disaster expenses (recoveries), net1,247 (25,683)63,830 11,601 — 
Impact of Holiday lease termination(50,184)— — — — 
Write-off of straight-line rental income, net of noncontrolling interests70,863 — — — — 
Allowance on loan investments and impairment of unconsolidated entities, net of noncontrolling interests34,543 — — — — 
Normalized FFO attributable to common stockholders$1,249,972 $1,423,047 $1,462,055 $1,491,241 $1,438,643 
54


Adjusted EBITDA

We consider Adjusted EBITDA an important supplemental measure because it provides another manner in which to evaluate our operating performance and serves as another indicator of our credit strength and our ability to service our debt obligations. We define Adjusted EBITDA as consolidated earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization (including non-cash stock-based compensation expense, asset impairment and valuation allowances), excluding gains or losses on extinguishment of debt, our partners’ share of EBITDA of consolidated entities, merger-related expenses and deal costs, expenses related to the reaudit and re-review in 2014 of our historical financial statements, net gains or losses on real estate activity, gains or losses on remeasurement of equity interest upon acquisition, changes in the fair value of financial instruments, unrealized foreign currency gains or losses, net expenses or recoveries related to natural disasters and non-cash charges related to leases, and including Ventas’ share of EBITDA from unconsolidated entities and adjustments for other immaterial or identified items. The following table sets forth a reconciliation of net income attributable to common stockholders to Adjusted EBITDA:
 For the Years Ended December 31,
 202020192018
 (In thousands)
Net income attributable to common stockholders$439,149 $433,016 $409,467 
Adjustments:   
Interest469,541 451,662 442,497 
Loss on extinguishment of debt, net10,791 41,900 58,254 
Taxes (including amounts in general, administrative and professional fees)(91,389)(52,677)(37,230)
Depreciation and amortization1,109,763 1,045,620 919,639 
Non-cash stock-based compensation expense21,487 33,923 29,963 
Merger-related expenses, deal costs and re-audit costs29,811 15,246 33,608 
Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests, adjusted for partners’ share of consolidated entity EBITDA(24,381)(16,396)(10,420)
Loss from unconsolidated entities, adjusted for Ventas share of EBITDA from unconsolidated entities59,631 32,462 86,278 
Gain on real estate dispositions(262,218)(26,022)(46,247)
Unrealized foreign currency (gains) losses(439)(1,061)138 
Changes in fair value of financial instruments(21,928)(104)(54)
Non-cash charges related to lease terminations— — 21,299 
Natural disaster expenses (recoveries), net1,203 (25,981)54,684 
Write-off of straight-line rental income from Holiday lease termination49,611 — — 
Write-off of straight-line rental income, net of noncontrolling interests70,863 — — 
Allowance on loan investments and impairment of unconsolidated entities, net of noncontrolling interests23,879 — — — 
Adjusted EBITDA$1,885,374 $1,931,588 $1,961,876 

NOI

We also consider NOI an important supplemental measure because it allows investors, analysts and our management to assess our unlevered property-level operating results and to compare our operating results with those of other real estate companies and between periods on a consistent basis. We define NOI as total revenues, less interest and other income,
55


property-level operating expenses and office building services costs. Cash receipts may differ due to straight-line recognition of certain rental income and the application of other GAAP policies.

The following table sets forth a reconciliation of net income attributable to common stockholders to NOI:
 For the Years Ended December 31,
 202020192018
 (In thousands)
Net income attributable to common stockholders$439,149 $433,016 $409,467 
Adjustments:   
Interest and other income(7,609)(10,984)(24,892)
Interest expense469,541 451,662 442,497 
Depreciation and amortization1,109,763 1,045,620 919,639 
General, administrative and professional fees130,158 158,726 145,978 
Loss on extinguishment of debt, net10,791 41,900 58,254 
Merger-related expenses and deal costs29,812 15,235 30,547 
Allowance on loan receivable and investments24,238 — — 
Discontinued operations— — 10 
Other707 (10,339)72,772 
Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests2,036 6,281 6,514 
(Income) loss from unconsolidated entities(1,844)2,454 55,034 
Income tax benefit(96,534)(56,310)(39,953)
Gain on real estate dispositions(262,218)(26,022)(46,247)
NOI$1,847,990 $2,051,239 $2,029,620 
See “Results of Operations” for discussions regarding both segment NOI and same-store segment NOI. We define same-store as properties owned, consolidated and operational for the full period in both comparison periods and are not otherwise excluded; provided, however, that we may include selected properties that otherwise meet the same-store criteria if they are included in substantially all of, but not a full, period for one or both of the comparison periods, and in our judgment such inclusion provides a more meaningful presentation of our portfolio performance.

Newly acquired or recently developed or redeveloped properties in our senior living operations segment will be included in same-store once they are stabilized for the full period in both periods presented. These properties are considered stabilized upon the earlier of (a) the achievement of 80% sustained occupancy or (b) 24 months from the date of acquisition or substantial completion of work. Recently developed or redeveloped properties in our office operations and triple-net leased properties segments will be included in same-store once substantial completion of work has occurred for the full period in both periods presented. Our senior living operations and triple-net leased properties that have undergone operator or business model transitions will be included in same-store once operating under consistent operating structures for the full period in both periods presented.

Properties are excluded from same-store if they are: (i) sold, classified as held for sale or properties whose operations were classified as discontinued operations in accordance with GAAP; (ii) impacted by materially disruptive events such as flood or fire; (iii) those properties that are currently undergoing a materially disruptive redevelopment; (iv) for our office operations, those properties for which management has an intention to institute a redevelopment plan because the properties may require major property-level expenditures to maximize value, increase NOI, or maintain a market-competitive position and/or achieve property stabilization; or (v) for the senior living operations and triple-net leased segments, those properties that are scheduled to undergo operator or business model transitions, or have transitioned operators or business models after the start of the prior comparison period.        

To eliminate the impact of exchange rate movements, all portfolio performance-based disclosures assume constant exchange rates across comparable periods, using the following methodology: the current period’s results are shown in actual reported USD, while prior comparison period’s results are adjusted and converted to USD based on the average exchange rate for the current period.

56


Asset/Liability Management

Asset/liability management, a key element of enterprise risk management, is designed to support the achievement of our business strategy, while ensuring that we maintain appropriate and tolerable levels of market risk (primarily interest rate risk and foreign currency exchange risk) and credit risk. Effective management of these risks is a contributing factor to the absolute levels and variability of our FFO and net worth. The following discussion addresses our integrated management of assets and liabilities, including the use of derivative financial instruments.

Market Risk

We are exposed to market risk related to changes in interest rates with respect to borrowings under our unsecured revolving credit facility, our secured construction revolver and our unsecured term loans, certain of our mortgage loans that are floating rate obligations, mortgage loans receivable that bear interest at floating rates and available for sale securities. These market risks result primarily from changes in LIBOR rates or prime rates. To manage these risks, we continuously monitor our level of floating rate debt with respect to total debt and other factors, including our assessment of current and future economic conditions.
57


The table below sets forth certain information with respect to our debt, excluding premiums and discounts.
 As of December 31,
 202020192018
 (Dollars in thousands)
Balance:   
Fixed rate:   
Senior notes$8,869,036$8,584,056$7,945,598
Unsecured term loans200,000200,000400,000
Secured revolving construction credit facility160,492
Mortgage loans and other1,389,2271,325,854698,136
Variable rate:   
Senior notes235,664231,018
Unsecured revolving credit facility39,395120,787765,919
Unsecured term loans392,773385,030500,000
Commercial paper notes567,450
Secured revolving construction credit facility154,09890,488
Mortgage loans and other702,878671,115429,561
Total$11,983,071$12,245,802$10,829,702
Percent of total debt:   
Fixed rate:   
Senior notes73.9 %70.1 %73.4 %
Unsecured term loans1.7 1.6 3.7 
Secured revolving construction credit facility— 1.3 — 
Mortgage loans and other11.6 10.8 6.4 
Variable rate:   
Senior notes2.0 1.9 — 
Unsecured revolving credit facility0.3 1.0 7.1 
Unsecured term loans3.3 3.1 4.6 
Commercial paper notes— 4.7 — 
Secured revolving construction credit facility1.3 — 0.8 
Mortgage loans and other5.9 5.5 4.0 
Total100.0 %100.0 %100.0 %
Weighted average interest rate at end of period:   
Fixed rate:   
Senior notes3.7 %3.7 %3.8 %
Unsecured term loans3.6 2.0 2.8 
Secured revolving construction credit facility— 4.5 — 
Mortgage loans and other3.5 3.7 4.4 
Variable rate:
Senior notes1.0 2.5 — 
Unsecured revolving credit facility1.0 2.4 3.2 
Unsecured term loans1.4 2.9 3.3 
Commercial paper notes— 2.0 — 
Secured revolving construction credit facility1.9 — 4.1 
Mortgage loans and other1.9 3.4 3.4 
Total3.4 3.5 3.7 

The variable rate debt in the table above reflects, in part, the effect of $146.7 million notional amount of interest rate swaps with maturities ranging from March 2022 to May 2022, in each case that effectively convert fixed rate debt to variable
58


rate debt. In addition, the fixed rate debt in the table above reflects, in part, the effect of $305.9 million and C$145.7 million notional amount of interest rate swaps with maturities ranging from January 2023 to December 2029, in each case that effectively convert variable rate debt to fixed rate debt. See “Note 10 – Senior Notes Payable and Other Debt” of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements included in Part II, Item 8 of this Annual Report.     

The decrease in our outstanding variable rate debt at December 31, 2020 compared to December 31, 2019 is primarily attributable to reduced borrowings on our revolving credit facility and commercial paper program, partially offset by the change in presentation of the secured revolving construction credit facility to variable rate debt. The secured revolving construction credit facility was previously reflected as fixed rate debt due to an interest rate swap which had effectively converted the associated interest expense from variable to fixed until its expiration in August 2020.

Assuming a 100 basis point increase in the weighted average interest rate related to our variable rate debt and assuming no change in our variable rate debt outstanding as of December 31, 2020, interest expense on an annualized basis would increase by approximately $14.7 million, or $0.04 per diluted common share.

As of December 31, 2020 and 2019, our joint venture partners’ aggregate share of total debt was $271.6 million and $228.2 million, respectively, with respect to certain properties we owned through consolidated joint ventures. Total debt does not include our portion of debt related to investments in unconsolidated real estate entities, which was $213.0 million and $60.6 million as of December 31, 2020 and 2019, respectively.

The fair value of our fixed rate debt is based on current market interest rates at which we could obtain similar borrowings. Increases in market interest rates typically result in a decrease in the fair value of fixed rate debt while decreases in market interest rates typically result in an increase in the fair value of fixed rate date. While changes in market interest rates affect the fair value of our fixed rate debt, these changes do not affect the interest expense associated with our fixed rate debt. Therefore, interest rate risk does not have a significant impact on our fixed rate debt obligations until their maturity or earlier prepayment and refinancing. If interest rates have risen at the time we seek to refinance our fixed rate debt, whether at maturity or otherwise, our future earnings and cash flows could be adversely affected by additional borrowing costs. Conversely, lower interest rates at the time of refinancing may reduce our overall borrowing costs.

To highlight the sensitivity of our fixed rate debt to changes in interest rates, the following summary shows the effects of a hypothetical instantaneous change of 100 basis points in interest rates:
 As of December 31,
 20202019
 (In thousands)
Gross book value$10,458,262 $10,270,402 
Fair value11,550,236 10,784,441 
Fair value reflecting change in interest rates:
-100 basis points12,204,507 11,438,507 
+100 basis points10,951,483 10,196,943 

The change in fair value of our fixed rate debt from December 31, 2019 to December 31, 2020 was due primarily to 2020 senior note issuances, net of repayments, partially offset by the change in presentation of the secured revolving construction credit facility to variable rate debt. The secured revolving construction credit facility was previously reflected as fixed rate debt due to an interest rate swap which had effectively converted the associated interest expense from variable to fixed until its expiration in August 2020.

As of December 31, 2020 and 2019, the fair value of our secured and non-mortgage loans receivable, based on our estimates of currently prevailing rates for comparable loans, was $565.7 million and $710.5 million, respectively. See “Note 6 – Loans Receivable and Investments” and “Note 11 – Fair Values of Financial Instruments” of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements included in Part II, Item 8 of this Annual Report.

As a result of our Canadian and United Kingdom operations, we are subject to fluctuations in certain foreign currency exchange rates that may, from time to time, affect our financial condition and operating performance. Based solely on our results for the year ended December 31, 2020 (including the impact of existing hedging arrangements), if the value of the U.S. dollar relative to the British pound and Canadian dollar were to increase or decrease by one standard deviation compared to the average exchange rate during the year, our normalized FFO per share for the year ended December 31, 2020 would decrease or
59


increase, as applicable, by less than $0.01 per share or 1%. We will continue to mitigate these risks through a layered approach to hedging looking out for the next year and continual assessment of our foreign operational capital structure. Nevertheless, we cannot assure you that any such fluctuations will not have an effect on our earnings.

Concentration and Credit Risk

We use concentration ratios to identify, understand and evaluate the potential impact of economic downturns and other adverse events that may affect our asset types, geographic locations, business models, and tenants, operators and managers. We evaluate concentration risk in terms of investment mix and operations mix. Investment mix measures the percentage of our investments that is concentrated in a specific asset type or that is operated or managed by a particular tenant, operator or manager. Operations mix measures the percentage of our operating results that is attributed to a particular tenant, operator or manager, geographic location or business model. The following tables reflect our concentration risk as of the dates and for the periods presented:
 As of
December 31,
 20202019
Investment mix by asset type(1):
  
Senior housing communities63.5 %62.2 %
MOBs19.7 19.3 
Research and innovation centers7.1 8.7 
Health systems5.2 5.1 
IRFs and LTACs1.7 1.6 
SNFs0.7 0.7 
Secured loans receivable and investments, net2.1 2.4 
Investment mix by tenant, operator and manager(1):
  
Atria20.8 %20.4 %
Sunrise10.4 10.3 
Brookdale Senior Living8.2 7.7 
Ardent4.9 4.7 
Kindred1.1 1.0 
All other54.6 55.9 

(1)Ratios are based on the gross book value of consolidated real estate investments (excluding properties classified as held for sale) as of each reporting date.
60


 For the Years Ended December 31,
 202020192018
Operations mix by tenant and operator and business model:   
Revenues(1):
   
Senior living operations58.0 %55.8 %55.3 %
Brookdale Senior Living(2)
4.4 4.7 4.3 
Ardent3.2 3.1 3.1 
Kindred3.5 3.3 3.5 
All others30.9 33.1 33.8 
Adjusted EBITDA:  
Senior living operations30.8 %32.5 %31.3 %
Brookdale Senior Living(2)
9.5 8.1 6.7 
Ardent7.0 5.4 5.1 
Kindred7.5 5.8 5.6 
All others45.2 48.2 51.3 
NOI:  
Senior living operations29.4 %31.1 %30.7 %
Brookdale Senior Living(2)
9.0 8.7 7.6 
Ardent6.6 5.8 5.7 
Kindred7.1 6.3 6.4 
All others47.9 48.1 49.6 
Operations mix by geographic location(3):
  
California15.7 %15.9 %15.7 %
New York8.1 8.8 8.4 
Texas6.1 6.0 6.2 
Pennsylvania4.6 4.7 4.6 
Illinois4.1 4.0 4.4 
All others61.4 60.6 60.7 

(1)Total revenues include medical office building and other services revenue, revenue from loans and investments and interest and other income (including amounts related to assets classified as held for sale).
(2)Results exclude eight senior housing communities which are included in the senior living operations reportable business segment. 2018 results include the impact of a net non-cash charge of $21.3 million related to April 2018 lease extensions.
(3)Ratios are based on total revenues (including amounts related to assets classified as held for sale) for each period presented.

See “Non-GAAP Financial Measures” included elsewhere in this Annual Report for additional disclosure and reconciliations of net income attributable to common stockholders, as computed in accordance with GAAP, to Adjusted EBITDA and NOI, respectively.

We derive a significant portion of our revenues by leasing assets under long-term triple-net leases in which the rental rate is generally fixed with escalators, subject to certain limitations. Some of our triple-net lease escalators are contingent upon the satisfaction of specified facility revenue parameters or based on increases in the Consumer Price Index (“CPI”), with caps, floors or collars. We also earn revenues directly from individual residents in our senior housing communities that are managed by independent operators, such as Atria and Sunrise, and tenants in our office buildings. For the year ended December 31, 2020, 61.0% of our Adjusted EBITDA was derived from our senior living operations and office operations, for which rental rates may fluctuate more frequently upon lease rollovers and renewals due to shorter-term leases and changing economic or market conditions.

The concentration of our triple-net leased properties segment revenues and operating income that are attributed to Brookdale Senior Living, Ardent and Kindred creates credit risk. If any of Brookdale Senior Living, Ardent or Kindred becomes unable or unwilling to satisfy its obligations to us or to renew its leases with us upon expiration of the terms thereof, our financial condition and results of operations could decline, and our ability to service our indebtedness and to make
61


distributions to our stockholders could be impaired. See “Risk Factors—Our Business Operations and Strategy Risks—A significant portion of our revenues and operating income is dependent on a limited number of tenants and managers, including Brookdale Senior Living, Ardent, Kindred, Atria and Sunrise.” included in Part I, Item 1A of this Annual Report and “Note 3 – Concentration of Credit Risk” of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements included in Part II, Item 8 of this Annual Report.

We regularly monitor and assess any changes in the relative credit risk of our significant tenants, and in particular those tenants that have recourse obligations under our triple-net leases. The ratios and metrics we use to evaluate a significant tenant’s liquidity and creditworthiness depend on facts and circumstances specific to that tenant and the industry or industries in which it operates, including without limitation the tenant’s credit history and economic conditions related to the tenant, its operations and the markets in which the tenant operates, that may vary over time. Among other things, we may (i) review and analyze information regarding the real estate, senior housing and healthcare industries generally, publicly available information regarding the significant tenant, and information required to be provided by the tenant under the terms of its lease agreements with us, (ii) examine monthly or quarterly financial statements of the significant tenant to the extent publicly available or otherwise provided under the terms of our lease agreements, and (iii) participate in periodic discussions and in-person meetings with representatives of the significant tenant.  Using this information, we calculate multiple financial ratios (which may, but do not necessarily, include leverage, fixed charge coverage and tangible net worth), after making certain adjustments based on our judgment, and assess other metrics we deem relevant to an understanding of the significant tenant’s credit risk.

Because Atria and Sunrise manage our properties in exchange for the receipt of a management fee from us, we are not directly exposed to the credit risk of our managers in the same manner or to the same extent as our triple-net tenants. However, we rely on our managers’ personnel, expertise, technical resources and information systems, proprietary information, good faith and judgment to manage our senior living operations efficiently and effectively. We also rely on Atria and Sunrise to set appropriate resident fees, to provide accurate property-level financials results in a timely manner and otherwise operate our senior housing communities in compliance with the terms of our management agreements and all applicable laws and regulations. Although we have various rights as the property owner under our management agreements, including various rights to terminate and exercise remedies under the agreements as provided therein, Atria’s or Sunrise’s failure, inability or unwillingness to satisfy its respective obligations under those agreements, to efficiently and effectively manage our properties or to provide timely and accurate accounting information with respect thereto could have a Material Adverse Effect on us. See “Risk Factors—Our Business Operations and Strategy Risks.” included in Part I, Item 1A of this Annual Report.

We hold a 34% ownership interest in Atria, which entitles us to customary minority rights and protections, as well as the right to appoint two of the six members on the Atria Board of Directors.    

Triple-Net Lease Performance and Expirations

Any failure, inability or unwillingness by our tenants to satisfy their obligations under our triple-net leases could have a material adverse effect on us. Also, if our tenants are not able or willing to renew our triple-net leases upon expiration, we may be unable to reposition the applicable properties on a timely basis or on the same or better economic terms, if at all. Although our lease expirations are staggered, the non-renewal of some or all of our triple-net leases that expire in any given year could have a material adverse effect on us. During the year ended December 31, 2020, we had no triple-net lease renewals or expirations without renewal that, in the aggregate, had a material impact on our financial condition or results of operations for that period. See “Risk Factors—Our Business Operations and Strategy Risks—If we must replace any of our tenants or managers, we may be unable to do so on as favorable terms, or at all, and we could be subject to delays, limitations and expenses, which could adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.” included in Part I, Item IA of this Annual Report.

62


The following table summarizes our lease expirations in our triple-net leased properties segment currently scheduled to occur over the next 10 years as of December 31, 2020:
Number of
Properties(1)
2020 Annualized Base Rent (“ABR”)(2)
% of 2020 Total Triple-Net Leased Properties Segment Rental Income
 (Dollars in thousands)
2021$12,062 1.7 %
20225,799 0.8 
2023(3)
31,240 4.5 
202426 13,970 2.0 
2025179 234,549 33.7 
202639 53,660 7.7 
20278,784 1.3 
202827 25,196 3.6 
202921 22,788 3.3 
20304,748 0.7 
(1)Excludes assets sold or classified as held for sale, unconsolidated entities development properties not yet operational, unconsolidated joint ventures and land parcels.
(2)ABR represents the annualized impact of the current period’s cash base rent at 100% share for consolidated entities. ABR does not include common area maintenance charges, the amortization of above/below market lease intangibles or other noncash items. ABR is used only for the purpose of determining lease expirations.
(3)Relates to 6 LTACs leased by Kindred. While the lease term expires in 2023, Kindred may extend the term for 5 years by delivering a renewal notice to the Company 12 to 18 months prior to expiration.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

During 2020, our principal sources of liquidity were cash flows from operations, proceeds from the issuance of debt and equity securities, borrowings under our unsecured revolving credit facility, and proceeds from asset sales.

For the next 12 months, our principal liquidity needs are to: (i) fund operating expenses; (ii) meet our debt service requirements; (iii) repay maturing mortgage and other debt; (iv) fund acquisitions, investments and commitments and any development and redevelopment activities; (v) fund capital expenditures; and (vi) make distributions to our stockholders and unitholders, as required for us to continue to qualify as a REIT. Depending upon the availability of external capital, we believe our liquidity is sufficient to fund these uses of cash. We expect that these liquidity needs generally will be satisfied by a combination of the following: cash flows from operations, cash on hand, debt assumptions and financings (including secured financings), issuances of debt and equity securities, dispositions of assets (in whole or in part through joint venture arrangements with third parties) and borrowings under our revolving credit facilities and commercial paper program. However, an inability to access liquidity through multiple capital sources concurrently could have a material adverse effect on us.

While continuing decreased revenue and net operating income as a result of the COVID-19 pandemic could lead to downgrades of our long-term credit rating and therefore adversely impact our cost of borrowing, we currently believe we will continue to have access to one or more debt markets during the duration of the pandemic and could seek to enter into secured debt financings or issue debt and equity securities to satisfy our liquidity needs, although no assurances can be made in this regard. See “COVID-19 Update.” See “Risk Factors—Our Capital Structure Risks—We are highly dependent on access to the capital markets. Limitations on our ability to access capital could have an adverse effect on us, including our ability to make required payments on our debt obligations, make distributions to our stockholders or make future investments necessary to implement our business strategy.” included in Part I, Item 1A of this Annual Report.

2020 Capital Conservation Actions

In 2020, we executed on a multi-pronged capital conservation strategy to mitigate the impact of COVID-19, which included reducing our planned capital expenditures and capital commitments. We also established a quarterly dividend of $0.45 per share beginning in the second quarter, which was a reduction from the first quarter dividend of $0.7925 per share. This action enabled us to conserve approximately $130 million of cash per quarter compared to the prior dividend level. Also, in June 2020, we eliminated roles representing over 25% of our corporate positions, excluding onsite field personnel. For the
63


second half of 2020, the base salaries of our CEO and other executive officers were voluntarily reduced by 20% and 10%, respectively. Primarily as a result of these capital conservation actions, our 2020 general and administrative expenses are $29 million lower than 2019.

See “Note 10 – Senior Notes Payable and Other Debt” of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements included in Part II, Item 8 of this Annual Report for further information regarding our significant financing activities.

Credit Facilities, Commercial Paper and Unsecured Term Loans

As of December 31, 2020, our unsecured credit facility was comprised of a $3.0 billion unsecured revolving credit facility priced at LIBOR plus 0.875% based on the Company’s debt rating, which was scheduled to mature in 2021. In January 2021, we entered into an amended and restated unsecured credit facility (the “New Credit Facility”) comprised of a $2.75 billion unsecured revolving credit facility initially priced at LIBOR plus 0.825% based on the Company’s debt rating. The New Credit Facility matures in 2025, but may be extended at our option subject to the satisfaction of certain conditions, for two additional periods of six months each. The New Credit Facility also includes an accordion feature that permits us to increase our aggregate borrowing capacity thereunder to up to $3.75 billion.

As of December 31, 2020, $39.4 million was outstanding under the unsecured revolving credit facility with an additional $24.9 million restricted to support outstanding letters of credit. In addition, we limit our utilization of the unsecured revolving credit facility, to the extent necessary, to support our commercial paper program when commercial paper notes are outstanding. We had $2.9 billion in available liquidity under the unsecured revolving credit facility as of December 31, 2020. In connection with the New Credit Facility, we paid off all amounts outstanding under the existing unsecured revolving credit facility as of January 29, 2021 by drawing down the same amount on the New Credit Facility.    

Our wholly owned subsidiary, Ventas Realty, Limited Partnership (“Ventas Realty”), may issue from time to time unsecured commercial paper notes up to a maximum aggregate amount outstanding at any time of $1.0 billion. The notes are sold under customary terms in the United States commercial paper note market and are ranked pari passu with all of Ventas Realty’s other unsecured senior indebtedness. The notes are fully and unconditionally guaranteed by Ventas, Inc. As of December 31, 2020, we had no borrowings outstanding under our commercial paper program.

As of December 31, 2020, we had a $200.0 million unsecured term loan priced at LIBOR plus 0.90% that matures in 2023.  The term loan also includes an accordion feature that effectively permits us to increase our aggregate borrowings thereunder to up to $800.0 million.

As of December 31, 2020, we had a $400.0 million secured revolving construction credit facility with $154.1 million of borrowings outstanding. The secured revolving construction credit facility matures in 2022 and is primarily used to finance the development of research and innovation centers and other construction projects.

As of December 31, 2020, we had a C$500 million unsecured term loan facility priced at Canadian Dollar Offered Rate (“CDOR”) plus 0.90% that matures in 2025.

Senior Notes

In April 2020, Ventas Realty issued and sold $500.0 million aggregate principal amount of 4.75% senior notes due 2030 at an amount equal to 97.86% of par.

In October 2020, we redeemed, pursuant to a cash tender offer, $236.3 million aggregate principal amount then outstanding of our 3.25% senior notes due 2022 at 104.14% of par value, plus accrued and unpaid interest to the payment date. As a result, we recognized a loss on extinguishment of debt of $11.1 million during the year ended December 31, 2020.

As of December 31, 2020, we had outstanding $7.7 billion aggregate principal amount of senior notes issued by Ventas Realty ($263.7 million of which was co-issued by Ventas Realty’s wholly owned subsidiary, Ventas Capital Corporation), approximately $75.2 million aggregate principal amount of senior notes issued by Nationwide Health Properties, Inc. (“NHP”) and assumed by our subsidiary, Nationwide Health Properties, LLC (“NHP LLC”), as successor to NHP, in connection with our acquisition of NHP, and C$1.7 billion aggregate principal amount of senior notes issued by our subsidiary, Ventas Canada Finance Limited (“Ventas Canada”). All of the senior notes issued by Ventas Realty and Ventas Canada are unconditionally guaranteed by Ventas, Inc.

64


In February 2021, in order to reduce near-term maturities, we issued a make-whole redemption for the entirety of the $400 million outstanding aggregate principal amount of 3.10% senior notes due January 2023. The redemption is expected to settle in March 2021 and will be funded primarily with cash on hand.

We may, from time to time, seek to retire or purchase our outstanding senior notes for cash or in exchange for equity securities in open market purchases, privately negotiated transactions or otherwise. Such repurchases or exchanges, if any, will depend on prevailing market conditions, our liquidity requirements, contractual restrictions, prospects for capital and other factors. The amounts involved may be material.

The indentures governing our outstanding senior notes require us to comply with various financial and other restrictive covenants. We were in compliance with all of these covenants at December 31, 2020.

Mortgages

At December 31, 2020 and 2019, our consolidated aggregate principal amount of mortgage debt outstanding was $2.1 billion and $2.0 billion, respectively, of which our share was $1.8 billion for both years.

Under certain circumstances, contractual and legal restrictions, including those contained in the instruments governing our subsidiaries’ outstanding mortgage indebtedness, may restrict our ability to obtain cash from our subsidiaries for the purpose of meeting our debt service obligations, including our payment guarantees with respect to Ventas Realty’s and Ventas Canada Finance Limited’s senior notes.

Derivatives and Hedging

In the normal course of our business, interest rate fluctuations affect future cash flows under our variable rate debt obligations, loans receivable and marketable debt securities, and foreign currency exchange rate fluctuations affect our operating results. We follow established risk management policies and procedures, including the use of derivative instruments, to mitigate the impact of these risks.

Dividends

During 2020, we declared four dividends totaling $2.1425 per share of our common stock, including a fourth quarter dividend of $0.45 per share. In order to continue to qualify as a REIT, we must make annual distributions to our stockholders of at least 90% of our REIT taxable income (excluding net capital gain). In addition, we will be subject to income tax at the regular corporate rate to the extent we distribute less than 100% of our REIT taxable income, including any net capital gains. We intend to pay dividends greater than 100% of our taxable income, after the use of any net operating loss carryforwards, for 2021.

We expect that our cash flows will exceed our REIT taxable income due to depreciation and other non-cash deductions in computing REIT taxable income and that we will be able to satisfy the 90% distribution requirement. However, from time to time, we may not have sufficient cash on hand or other liquid assets to meet this requirement or we may decide to retain cash or distribute such greater amount as may be necessary to avoid income and excise taxation. If we do not have sufficient cash on hand or other liquid assets to enable us to satisfy the 90% distribution requirement, or if we desire to retain cash, we may borrow funds, issue additional equity securities, pay taxable stock dividends, if possible, distribute other property or securities or engage in a transaction intended to enable us to meet the REIT distribution requirements or any combination of the foregoing.

Capital Expenditures

The terms of our triple-net leases generally obligate our tenants to pay all capital expenditures necessary to maintain and improve our triple-net leased properties. However, from time to time, we may fund the capital expenditures for our triple-net leased properties through loans or advances to the tenants, which may increase the amount of rent payable with respect to the properties in certain cases. We may also fund capital expenditures for which we may become responsible upon expiration of our triple-net leases or in the event that our tenants are unable or unwilling to meet their obligations under those leases. We also expect to fund capital expenditures related to our senior living operations and office operations reportable business segments with the cash flows from the properties or through additional borrowings. We expect that these liquidity needs generally will be satisfied by a combination of the following: cash flows from operations, cash on hand, debt assumptions and financings (including secured financings), issuances of debt and equity securities, dispositions of assets (in whole or in part through joint venture arrangements with third parties) and borrowings under our revolving credit facilities.
65



To the extent that unanticipated capital expenditure needs arise or significant borrowings are required, our liquidity may be affected adversely. Our ability to borrow additional funds may be restricted in certain circumstances by the terms of the instruments governing our outstanding indebtedness.

We are party to certain agreements that obligate us to develop senior housing or healthcare properties funded through capital that we and, in certain circumstances, our joint venture partners provide. As of December 31, 2020, we had 13 properties under development pursuant to these agreements, including three properties that are owned by unconsolidated real estate entities. In addition, from time to time, we engage in redevelopment projects with respect to our existing senior housing communities to maximize the value, increase NOI, maintain a market-competitive position, achieve property stabilization or change the primary use of the property.

Equity Offerings

From time to time, we may sell up to an aggregate of $1.0 billion of our common stock under an “at-the-market” equity offering program (“ATM program”). As of December 31, 2020, we have $755.5 million remaining under our existing ATM program. During the years ended December 31, 2020 and 2019, we sold 1.5 million and 2.7 million shares of our common stock under our ATM program for gross proceeds of $44.88 and $66.75 per share, respectively. During the year ended December 31, 2018, we sold no shares of common stock under our ATM program.

In June 2019, we sold 12.7 million shares of our common stock under a registered public offering for gross proceeds of $62.75 per share. We used the majority of the net proceeds to fund our LGM Acquisition. See “Note 4 – Acquisitions of Real Estate Property” of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements included in Part II, Item 8 of this Annual Report for additional information regarding the LGM Acquisition.

Cash Flows

The following table sets forth our sources and uses of cash flows for the years ended December 31, 2020 and 2019:
 For the Years Ended
December 31,
(Decrease) Increase
to Cash
 20202019$%
 (Dollars in thousands)
Cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash at beginning of year$146,102 $131,464 $14,638 11.1 %
Net cash provided by operating activities1,450,176 1,437,783 12,393 0.9 
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities154,295 (1,585,299)1,739,594 nm
Net cash (used in) provided by financing activities(1,300,021)160,674 (1,460,695)nm
Effect of foreign currency translation1,088 1,480 (392)(26.5)
Cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash at end of year$451,640 $146,102 305,538 nm

nm—not meaningful

Cash Flows from Operating Activities

Cash flows from operating activities increased $12.4 million during the year ended December 31, 2020 over the same period in 2019 primarily due to the up-front consideration received in connection with the Brookdale transaction, partially offset by lower NOI.

Cash Flows from Investing Activities

Cash flows from investing activities increased $1.7 billion during 2020 over 2019 primarily due to decreased acquisition and investment activity together with increased proceeds from real estate dispositions.

66


Cash Flows from Financing Activities

Cash flows from financing activities decreased $1.5 billion during 2020 over 2019 primarily due to lower issuances of common stock, decreased debt borrowings during 2020, net of repayments, partially offset by lower dividends paid to common stockholders during 2020.

Contractual Obligations

The following table summarizes the effect that minimum debt (which includes principal and interest payments) and other material noncancelable commitments are expected to have on our cash flow in future periods as of December 31, 2020:
Total
Less than 1 year(3)
1 - 3 years(4)
3 - 5 years(5)
More than 5
years(6)
 (In thousands)
Long-term debt obligations (1) (2)
$15,107,176 $1,002,409 $3,475,813 $3,794,808 $6,834,146 
Operating obligations, including ground lease obligations726,410 26,968 43,352 36,413 619,677 
Total$15,833,586 $1,029,377 $3,519,165 $3,831,221 $7,453,823 

(1)Amounts represent contractual amounts due, including interest.
(2)Interest on variable rate debt based on rates as of December 31, 2020.
(3)Includes $39.4 million of borrowings outstanding on our unsecured revolving credit facility and $235.7 million outstanding principal amount of our floating rate senior notes, Series F due 2021.
(4)Includes $154.1 million of borrowings outstanding on our secured revolving construction credit facility, $263.7 million outstanding principal amount of our 3.25% senior notes due 2022, $196.4 million outstanding principal amount of our 3.30% senior notes, Series C due 2022, $216.0 million outstanding principal amount of our 2.55% senior notes, Series D due 2023, $200.0 million of borrowings outstanding on our unsecured term loan due 2023, $400.0 million outstanding principal amount of our 3.125% senior notes due 2023, and $400.0 million outstanding principal amount of our 3.10% senior notes due 2023.
(5)Includes $400.0 million outstanding principal amount of our 3.50% senior notes due 2024, $400.0 million outstanding principal amount of our 3.75% senior notes due 2024, $471.3 million outstanding principal amount of our 2.80% senior notes, Series E due 2024, $196.4 million outstanding principal amount of our 4.125% senior notes, Series B due 2024, $392.8 million of borrowings outstanding on our unsecured term loan due 2025, $450.0 million outstanding principal amount of our 2.65% senior notes due 2025, and $600.0 million outstanding principal amount of our 3.50% senior notes due 2025.
(6)Includes $4.8 billion aggregate principal amount outstanding of our senior notes maturing between 2025 and 2049. $52.4 million aggregate principal amount outstanding of our 6.90% senior notes due 2037 are subject to repurchase, at the option of the holders, at par, on October 1, 2027, and $22.8 million aggregate principal amount outstanding of our 6.59% senior notes due 2038 are subject to repurchase, at the option of the holders, at par, on July 7 in each of 2023 and 2028.

As of December 31, 2020, we had $6.1 million of unrecognized tax benefits that are excluded from the table above, as we are unable to make a reasonably reliable estimate of the period of cash settlement, if any, with the respective tax authority.

Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements

We own interests in certain unconsolidated entities as described in Note 7 – Investments in Unconsolidated Entities. Except in limited circumstances, our risk of loss is limited to our investment in the joint venture and any outstanding loans receivable. In addition, we have certain properties which serve as collateral for debt that is owed by a previous owner of certain of our facilities, as described under Note 10 – Senior Notes Payable and Other Debt to the Consolidated Financial Statements. Our risk of loss for these certain properties is limited to the outstanding debt balance plus penalties, if any. Further, we use financial derivative instruments to hedge interest rate and foreign currency exchange rate exposure. Finally, at December 31, 2020, we had $24.9 million outstanding letter of credit obligations. We have no other material off-balance sheet arrangements that we expect would materially affect our liquidity and capital resources except those described above under “Contractual Obligations.”

67


Guarantor and Issuer Financial Information

Ventas, Inc. has fully and unconditionally guaranteed the obligation to pay principal and interest with respect to the outstanding senior notes issued by our 100%-owned subsidiary, Ventas Realty, including the senior notes that were jointly issued with Ventas Capital Corporation. Ventas Capital Corporation is a direct, 100%-owned subsidiary of Ventas Realty that has no assets or operations, but was formed in 2002 solely to facilitate offerings of senior notes by a limited partnership. None of our other subsidiaries (excluding Ventas Realty and Ventas Capital Corporation) is obligated with respect to Ventas Realty’s outstanding senior notes.

Ventas, Inc. has also fully and unconditionally guaranteed the obligation to pay principal and interest with respect to the outstanding senior notes issued by our 100%-owned subsidiary Ventas Canada Finance Limited (“Ventas Canada”). None of our other subsidiaries is obligated with respect to Ventas Canada’s outstanding senior notes, all of which were issued on a private placement basis in Canada.

In connection with the acquisition of Nationwide Health Properties, Inc. (“NHP”), our 100%-owned subsidiary Nationwide Health Properties, LLC (“NHP LLC”), as successor to NHP, assumed the obligation to pay principal and interest with respect to the outstanding senior notes issued by NHP. Neither we nor any of our subsidiaries (other than NHP LLC) is obligated with respect to any of NHP LLC’s outstanding senior notes.

Under certain circumstances, contractual and legal restrictions, including those contained in the instruments governing our subsidiaries’ outstanding mortgage indebtedness, may restrict our ability to obtain cash from our subsidiaries for the purpose of meeting our debt service obligations, including our payment guarantees with respect to Ventas Realty’s and Ventas Canada’s senior notes.

The following summarizes our guarantor and issuer balance sheet and statement of income information as of December 31, 2020 and December 31, 2019 and for the years ended December 31, 2020, 2019 and 2018.

Balance Sheet Information
As of December 31, 2020
GuarantorIssuer
 (In thousands)
Assets  
Investment in and advances to affiliates$16,576,278 $2,727,931 
Total assets16,937,149 2,844,339 
Liabilities and equity  
Intercompany loans10,691,626 (4,532,350)
Total liabilities10,918,320 3,577,009 
Redeemable OP unitholder and noncontrolling interests89,669 — 
Total equity (deficit)5,929,161 (732,670)
Total liabilities and equity16,937,149 2,844,339 

68


Balance Sheet Information

As of December 31, 2019
GuarantorIssuer
 (In thousands)
Assets  
Investment in and advances to affiliates$15,774,897 $2,728,110 
Total assets15,875,910 2,838,270 
Liabilities and equity  
Intercompany loans8,789,600 (5,105,070)
Total liabilities9,133,733 3,363,067 
Redeemable OP unitholder and noncontrolling interests102,657 — 
Total equity (deficit)6,639,520 (524,797)
Total liabilities and equity15,875,910 2,838,270 

Statement of Income Information
For the Year Ended December 31, 2020
GuarantorIssuer
 (In thousands)
Equity earnings in affiliates$469,311 $— 
Total revenues474,392 143,259 
Income (loss) before unconsolidated entities, real estate dispositions, income taxes and noncontrolling interests440,210 (215,406)
Net income (loss)439,149 (202,845)
Net income (loss) attributable to common stockholders439,149 (202,845)

Statement of Income Information
For the Year Ended December 31, 2019
GuarantorIssuer
 (In thousands)
Equity earnings in affiliates$362,143 $— 
Total revenues366,243 142,754 
Income (loss) before unconsolidated entities, real estate dispositions, income taxes and noncontrolling interests432,020 (246,929)
Net income (loss)433,016 (246,841)
Net income (loss) attributable to common stockholders433,016 (246,841)

For the Year Ended December 31, 2018
GuarantorIssuer
 (In thousands)
Equity earnings in affiliates$308,764 $— 
Total revenues335,613 139,062 
Income (loss) before unconsolidated entities, real estate dispositions, income taxes and noncontrolling interests400,349 (269,557)
Net income (loss)409,467 (269,557)
Net income (loss) attributable to common stockholders409,467 (269,557)


69


ITEM 7A.    Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
The information set forth in Part II, Item 7 of this Annual Report under “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations—Asset/Liability Management” is incorporated by reference into this Item 7A.

70


ITEM 8.    Financial Statements and Supplementary Data
Ventas, Inc.
Index to Consolidated Financial Statements and Financial Statement Schedules

Consolidated Balance Sheets as of December 31, 2020 and 2019
Consolidated Statements of Income for the Years Ended December 31, 2020, 2019 and 2018
Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income for the Years Ended December 31, 2020, 2019 and 2018
Consolidated Statements of Equity for the Years Ended December 31, 2020, 2019 and 2018
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the Years Ended December 31, 2020, 2019 and 2018
71


MANAGEMENT REPORT ON INTERNAL CONTROL OVER FINANCIAL REPORTING
Our management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting, as defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) under the Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. This system is designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of consolidated financial statements for external purposes in accordance with U.S. GAAP. Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting is not intended to provide absolute assurance that a misstatement of our financial statements would be prevented or detected.

Management, with the participation of the Company’s Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, conducted an assessment of the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting based on the criteria set forth in Internal Control - Integrated Framework (2013) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). Based on this assessment, management has concluded that our internal control over financial reporting was effective at the reasonable assurance level as of December 31, 2020.

The effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2020 has been audited by KPMG LLP, an independent registered public accounting firm, as stated in their report included herein.






72


Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

To the Stockholders and Board of Directors
Ventas, Inc.:

Opinion on the Consolidated Financial Statements

We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Ventas, Inc. and subsidiaries (the Company) as of December 31, 2020 and 2019, the related consolidated statements of income, comprehensive income, equity, and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2020, and the related notes and financial statement schedules III and IV (collectively, the consolidated financial statements). In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of the Company as of December 31, 2020 and 2019, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2020, in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles.

We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (PCAOB), the Company’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2020, based on criteria established in Internal Control – Integrated Framework (2013) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission, and our report dated February 23, 2021 expressed an unqualified opinion on the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting.

Change in Accounting Principle

As discussed in Note 2 to the consolidated financial statements, the Company has changed its method of accounting for leases as of January 1, 2019 due to the adoption of Financial Accounting Standards Board’s Accounting Standards Codification (ASC) Topic 842, Leases.

Basis for Opinion

These consolidated financial statements are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these consolidated financial statements based on our audits. We are a public accounting firm registered with the PCAOB and are required to be independent with respect to the Company in accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.

We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the consolidated financial statements are free of material misstatement, whether due to error or fraud. Our audits included performing procedures to assess the risks of material misstatement of the consolidated financial statements, whether due to error or fraud, and performing procedures that respond to those risks. Such procedures included examining, on a test basis, evidence regarding the amounts and disclosures in the consolidated financial statements. Our audits also included evaluating the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the consolidated financial statements. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

Critical Audit Matters

The critical audit matters communicated below are matters arising from the current period audit of the consolidated financial statements that were communicated or required to be communicated to the audit committee and that: (1) relate to accounts or disclosures that are material to the consolidated financial statements and (2) involved our especially challenging, subjective, or complex judgments. The communication of critical audit matters does not alter in any way our opinion on the consolidated financial statements, taken as a whole, and we are not, by communicating the critical audit matters below, providing separate opinions on the critical audit matters or on the accounts or disclosures to which they relate.

Probability of collection of substantially all triple-net rents

As discussed in Note 2 to the consolidated financial statements, the Company assesses the probability of collecting substantially all triple-net rents on a lease-by-lease basis. Whenever the results of that assessment, events, or
73


changes in circumstances indicate that it is not probable the Company will collect substantially all triple-net rents under the lease, the Company records a charge to rental income.

We identified the evaluation of the probability of collection of substantially all triple-net rents as a critical audit matter. Complex auditor judgment was required to evaluate the various inputs and assumptions to the collectability assessment, including the financial strength of the tenant and any guarantors, and the operating performance of the leased property.

The following are the primary procedures we performed to address this critical audit matter. We evaluated the design and tested the operating effectiveness of certain internal controls over the Company’s evaluation of the inputs and assumptions used in the collectability assessment. To assess the Company’s assumptions about the financial strength of certain tenants and guarantors and the operating performance of the related leased properties, we identified and evaluated the relevance, reliability, and sufficiency of the tenant, guarantor and property financial information; tenant guarantees; the existence of outstanding accounts receivable; and the remaining term of the lease. We compared the Company’s historical determinations to actual collections to assess the Company’s ability to accurately estimate probability of collections.

Impairment of real estate investments in the triple-net leased and senior living operations segments

As discussed in Notes 1, 2, and 5 to the consolidated financial statements, the Company periodically evaluates its long-lived assets, primarily consisting of investments in real estate, for impairment indicators. If indicators of impairment are present, the Company evaluates the carrying value of the related real estate investments in relation to the future undiscounted cash flows of the underlying operations. In performing this evaluation, the Company considers market conditions and current intentions with respect to holding or disposing of the asset and adjusts the net book value of real estate properties to fair value if the sum of the expected future undiscounted cash flows, including sales proceeds, is less than book value. During the year, impairment indicators arose for certain real estate properties. As a result, recoverability assessments were performed, estimated fair values were determined, and impairment losses were recognized for certain properties.

We identified the evaluation of real estate investments within the triple-net leased and senior living operations segments for impairment as a critical audit matter. Subjective auditor judgment was required in evaluating the Company’s determination of the future undiscounted cash flows and estimated fair values of properties where undiscounted cash flows were less than net book value. In particular, the undiscounted cash flows and fair value estimates were sensitive to significant assumptions, including capitalization rates, projected operating cash flows, and stabilization period. Additionally, subjective auditor judgment and specialized skills and knowledge were needed to evaluate comparable market transactions used by the Company to develop certain fair value estimates due to limited transactional volume.

The following are the primary procedures we performed to address this critical audit matter. We evaluated the design and tested the operating effectiveness of certain internal controls related to the impairment process. This included controls related to the Company’s impairment process and the significant assumptions and fair value estimates described above. To test certain of the Company’s undiscounted cash flow estimates, we evaluated the Company’s forecasts of projected operating cash flows by comparing actual results to the Company’s forecasts adjusted for current market trends. In addition, we involved valuation professionals with specialized skills and knowledge, who assisted in:

●    evaluating the Company’s significant assumptions by comparing the significant assumptions to publicly available market data, and

●    developing independent estimates of fair value for certain properties using comparable market transactions and discounted cash flows developed using the Company’s historical results and publicly available market data.

/s/ KPMG LLP        

We have served as the Company’s auditor since 2014.

Chicago, Illinois
February 23, 2021
74


Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

To the Stockholders and Board of Directors Ventas, Inc.:

Opinion on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting

We have audited Ventas, Inc. and subsidiaries' (the Company) internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2020, based on criteria established in Internal Control – Integrated Framework (2013) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission. In our opinion, the Company maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2020, based on criteria established in Internal Control – Integrated Framework (2013) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission.

We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (PCAOB), the consolidated balance sheets of the Company as of December 31, 2020 and 2019, the related consolidated statements of income, comprehensive income, equity, and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2020, and the related notes and financial statement schedules III and IV (collectively, the consolidated financial statements), and our report dated February 23, 2021 expressed an unqualified opinion on those consolidated financial statements.

Basis for Opinion

The Company’s management is responsible for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, included in the accompanying Internal Control over Financial Reporting. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Company’s internal control over financial reporting based on our audit. We are a public accounting firm registered with the PCAOB and are required to be independent with respect to the Company in accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.

We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material respects. Our audit of internal control over financial reporting included obtaining an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, assessing the risk that a material weakness exists, and testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control based on the assessed risk. Our audit also included performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.

Definition and Limitations of Internal Control Over Financial Reporting

A company’s internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A company’s internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (1) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company; and (3) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the company’s assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.

Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.

/s/ KPMG LLP    

Chicago, Illinois February 23, 2021
75


VENTAS, INC.
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
As of December 31,
20202019
 (In thousands, except per
share amounts)
Assets  
Real estate investments:  
Land and improvements$2,261,415 $2,285,648 
Buildings and improvements24,323,279 24,386,051 
Construction in progress265,748 461,815 
Acquired lease intangibles1,230,886 1,308,077 
Operating lease assets346,372 385,225 
28,427,700 28,826,816 
Accumulated depreciation and amortization(7,877,665)(7,092,243)
Net real estate property20,550,035 21,734,573 
Secured loans receivable and investments, net605,567 704,612 
Investments in unconsolidated real estate entities443,688 45,022 
Net real estate investments21,599,290 22,484,207 
Cash and cash equivalents413,327 106,363 
Escrow deposits and restricted cash38,313 39,739 
Goodwill1,051,650 1,051,161 
Assets held for sale9,608 85,527 
Deferred income tax assets, net9,987 47,495 
Other assets807,229 877,716 
Total assets$23,929,404 $24,692,208 
Liabilities and equity  
Liabilities:  
Senior notes payable and other debt$11,895,412 $12,158,773 
Accrued interest111,444 111,115 
Operating lease liabilities209,917 251,196 
Accounts payable and other liabilities1,133,066 1,145,939 
Liabilities related to assets held for sale3,246 5,224 
Deferred income tax liabilities62,638 200,831 
Total liabilities13,415,723 13,873,078 
Redeemable OP unitholder and noncontrolling interests235,490 273,678 
Commitments and contingencies00
Equity:  
Ventas stockholders’ equity:  
Preferred stock, $1.00 par value; 10,000 shares authorized, unissued
Common stock, $0.25 par value; 600,000 shares authorized, 374,609 and 372,811 shares issued at December 31, 2020 and 2019, respectively93,635 93,185 
Capital in excess of par value14,171,262 14,056,453 
Accumulated other comprehensive loss(54,354)(34,564)
Retained earnings (deficit)(4,030,376)(3,669,050)
Treasury stock, 0 and 2 shares at December 31, 2020 and 2019, respectively(132)
Total Ventas stockholders’ equity10,180,167 10,445,892 
Noncontrolling interests98,024 99,560 
Total equity10,278,191 10,545,452 
Total liabilities and equity$23,929,404 $24,692,208 

  See accompanying notes.
76


VENTAS, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME
For the Years Ended December 31,
202020192018
 (In thousands, except per share
amounts)
Revenues   
Rental income:   
Triple-net leased$695,265 $780,898 $737,796 
Office799,627 828,978 776,011 
1,494,892 1,609,876 1,513,807 
Resident fees and services2,197,160 2,151,533 2,069,477 
Office building and other services revenue15,191 11,156 13,416 
Income from loans and investments80,505 89,201 124,218 
Interest and other income7,609 10,984 24,892 
Total revenues3,795,357 3,872,750 3,745,810 
Expenses   
Interest469,541 451,662 442,497 
Depreciation and amortization1,109,763 1,045,620 919,639 
Property-level operating expenses:
Senior living1,658,671 1,521,398 1,446,201 
Office256,612 260,249 243,679 
Triple-net leased22,160 26,561 
1,937,443 1,808,208 1,689,880 
Office building services costs2,315 2,319 1,418 
General, administrative and professional fees130,158 158,726 145,978 
Loss on extinguishment of debt, net10,791 41,900 58,254 
Merger-related expenses and deal costs29,812 15,235 30,547 
Allowance on loans receivable and investments24,238 
Other707 (10,339)72,772 
Total expenses3,714,768 3,513,331 3,360,985 
Income before unconsolidated entities, real estate dispositions, income taxes, discontinued operations and noncontrolling interests80,589 359,419 384,825 
Income (loss) from unconsolidated entities1,844 (2,454)(55,034)
Gain on real estate dispositions262,218 26,022 46,247 
Income tax benefit96,534 56,310 39,953 
Income from continuing operations441,185 439,297 415,991 
Discontinued operations(10)
Net income441,185 439,297 415,981 
Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests2,036 6,281 6,514 
Net income attributable to common stockholders$439,149 $433,016 $409,467 
Earnings per common share   
Basic:   
Income from continuing operations$1.18 $1.20 $1.17 
Net income attributable to common stockholders1.18 1.18 1.15 
Diluted:
Income from continuing operations$1.17 $1.19 $1.16 
Net income attributable to common stockholders1.17 1.17 1.14 

  See accompanying notes.
77


VENTAS, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME
For the Years Ended December 31,
202020192018
 (In thousands)
Net income$441,185 $439,297 $415,981 
Other comprehensive (loss) income:   
Foreign currency translation3,254 5,729 (9,436)
Unrealized (loss) gain on available for sale securities(3,549)11,634 14,944 
Derivative instruments(17,918)(30,814)10,030 
Total other comprehensive (loss) income(18,213)(13,451)15,538 
Comprehensive income422,972 425,846 431,519 
Comprehensive income attributable to noncontrolling interests3,613 7,649 6,514 
Comprehensive income attributable to common stockholders$419,359 $418,197 $425,005 

See accompanying notes.
78


VENTAS, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF EQUITY
For the Years Ended December 31, 2020, 2019 and 2018
Common
Stock Par
Value
Capital in
Excess of
Par Value
Accumulated Other Comprehensive LossRetained
Earnings
(Deficit)
Treasury
Stock
Total Ventas
Stockholders’
Equity
Non- controlling
Interests
Total Equity
 (In thousands, except per share amounts)
Balance at January 1, 2018$89,029 $13,053,057 $(35,120)$(2,240,698)$(42)$10,866,226 $65,959 $10,932,185 
Net income— — — 409,467 — 409,467 6,514 415,981 
Other comprehensive income— — 15,538 — — 15,538 — 15,538 
Net change in noncontrolling interests— (7,470)— — — (7,470)(16,736)(24,206)
Dividends to common stockholders—$3.1625 per share— — — (1,129,626)— (1,129,626)— (1,129,626)
Issuance of common stock for stock plans, restricted stock grants and other93 34,647 — — (210)34,530 — 34,530 
Adjust redeemable OP unitholder interests to current fair value— (3,323)— — — (3,323)— (3,323)
Redemption of OP Units(383)— — 252 (128)— (128)
Cumulative effect of change in accounting principles— — — 30,643 — 30,643 — 30,643 
Balance at December 31, 201889,125 13,076,528 (19,582)(2,930,214)— 10,215,857 55,737 10,271,594 
Net income— — — 433,016 — 433,016 6,281 439,297 
Other comprehensive (loss) income— — (14,819)— — (14,819)1,368 (13,451)
Net change in noncontrolling interests— (12,332)— — — (12,332)36,174 23,842 
Dividends to common stockholders—$3.17 per share— — — (1,172,653)— (1,172,653)— (1,172,653)
Issuance of common stock3,829 938,509 — — — 942,338 — 942,338 
Issuance of common stock for stock plans, restricted stock grants and other230 61,875 — — (132)61,973 — 61,973 
Adjust redeemable OP unitholder interests to current fair value— (7,388)— — — (7,388)— (7,388)
Redemption of OP Units(739)— — — (738)— (738)
Cumulative effect of change in accounting principle— — (163)801 — 638 — 638 
Balance at December 31, 201993,185 14,056,453 (34,564)(3,669,050)(132)10,445,892 99,560 10,545,452 
Net income— — — 439,149 — 439,149 2,036 441,185 
Other comprehensive (loss) income— — (19,790)— — (19,790)1,577 (18,213)
Net change in noncontrolling interests— 8,227 — — — 8,227 (5,149)3,078 
Dividends to common stockholders—$2.1425 per share— — — (800,475)— (800,475)— (800,475)
Issuance of common stock371 65,640 — — — 66,011 — 66,011 
Issuance of common stock for stock plans, restricted stock grants and other79 22,568 — — 132 22,779 — 22,779 
Adjust redeemable OP unitholder interests to current fair value— 18,638 — — — 18,638 — 18,638 
Redemption of OP Units— (264)— — — (264)— (264)
Balance at December 31, 2020$93,635 $14,171,262 $(54,354)$(4,030,376)$$10,180,167 $98,024 $10,278,191 

   See accompanying notes.
79


VENTAS, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
For the Years Ended December 31,
202020192018
 (In thousands)
Cash flows from operating activities:   
Net income$441,185 $439,297 $415,981 
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities:   
Depreciation and amortization1,109,763 1,045,620 919,639 
Amortization of deferred revenue and lease intangibles, net(40,856)(7,967)(30,660)
Other non-cash amortization20,719 22,985 18,886 
Allowance on loans receivable and investments24,238 
Stock-based compensation21,487 33,923 29,963 
Straight-lining of rental income103,082 (30,073)13,396 
Loss on extinguishment of debt, net10,791 41,900 58,254 
Gain on real estate dispositions(262,218)(26,022)(46,247)
Gain on real estate loan investments(167)(13,202)
Income tax benefit(101,985)(58,918)(43,026)
(Income) loss from unconsolidated entities(1,832)2,464 55,034 
Distributions from unconsolidated entities4,920 1,600 2,934 
Real estate impairments related to natural disasters52,510 
Other(779)13,264 3,720 
Changes in operating assets and liabilities:
Increase in other assets(68,233)(76,693)(23,198)
Increase in accrued interest276 9,737 4,992 
Increase (decrease) in accounts payable and other liabilities189,785 26,666 (37,509)
Net cash provided by operating activities1,450,176 1,437,783 1,381,467 
Cash flows from investing activities:   
Net investment in real estate property(78,648)(958,125)(265,907)
Investment in loans receivable(115,163)(1,258,187)(229,534)
Proceeds from real estate disposals1,044,357 147,855 353,792 
Proceeds from loans receivable119,011 1,017,309 911,540 
Development project expenditures(380,413)(403,923)(330,876)
Capital expenditures(148,234)(156,724)(131,858)
Distributions from unconsolidated entities172 57,455 
Investment in unconsolidated entities(286,822)(3,855)(47,007)
Insurance proceeds for property damage claims207 30,179 6,891 
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities154,295 (1,585,299)324,496 
Cash flows from financing activities:   
Net change in borrowings under revolving credit facilities(88,868)(569,891)321,463 
Net change in borrowings under commercial paper program(565,524)565,524 
Proceeds from debt733,298 3,013,191 2,549,473 
Repayment of debt(479,539)(2,623,916)(3,465,579)
Purchase of noncontrolling interests(8,239)(4,724)
Payment of deferred financing costs(8,379)(21,403)(20,612)
Issuance of common stock, net55,362 942,085 
Cash distribution to common stockholders(928,809)(1,157,720)(1,127,143)
Cash distribution to redeemable OP unitholders(7,283)(9,218)(7,459)
Cash issued for redemption of OP Units(575)(2,203)(1,370)
Contributions from noncontrolling interests1,314 6,282 1,883 
Distributions to noncontrolling interests(12,946)(9,717)(11,574)
Proceeds from stock option exercises15,103 36,179 8,762 
Other(4,936)(8,519)(5,057)
Net cash (used in) provided by financing activities(1,300,021)160,674 (1,761,937)
Net increase (decrease) in cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash304,450 13,158 (55,974)
Effect of foreign currency translation1,088 1,480 (815)
Cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash at beginning of year146,102 131,464 188,253 
Cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash at end of year$451,640 $146,102 $131,464 
80


VENTAS, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS (Continued)
For the Years Ended December 31,
202020192018
(In thousands)
Supplemental disclosure of cash flow information:   
Interest paid including payments and receipts for derivative instruments$429,636 $410,854 $406,907 
Supplemental schedule of non-cash activities:   
Assets acquired and liabilities assumed from acquisitions and other:   
Real estate investments$170,484 $1,057,138 $94,280 
Other assets1,224 11,140 5,398 
Debt55,368 907,746 30,508 
Other liabilities2,707 47,121 18,086 
Deferred income tax liability337 95 922 
Noncontrolling interests20,259 113,316 2,591 
Equity issued30,487 
Equity issued for redemption of OP Units127 907 

See accompanying notes.
81

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS


NOTE 1–DESCRIPTION OF BUSINESS

Ventas, Inc. (together with its subsidiaries, unless otherwise indicated or except where the context otherwise requires, “we,” “us” or “our”), an S&P 500 company, is a real estate investment trust (“REIT”) operating at the intersection of healthcare and real estate, with a highly diversified portfolio of senior housing; life science, research and innovation; and healthcare properties; which we generally refer to as “healthcare real estate,” located throughout the United States, Canada and the United Kingdom. As of December 31, 2020, we owned or managed through unconsolidated real estate entities approximately 1,200 properties and properties classified as held for sale, consisting of senior housing communities, medical office buildings (“MOBs”), life science, research and innovation centers, inpatient rehabilitation facilities (“IRFs”) and long-term acute care facilities (“LTACs”), and health systems. Our company was originally founded in 1983 and is headquartered in Chicago, Illinois with an additional office in Louisville, Kentucky.

We primarily invest in a diversified portfolio of healthcare real estate asset through wholly owned subsidiaries and other co-investment entities. We operate through three reportable business segments: triple-net leased properties, senior living operations, which we also refer to as SHOP, and office operations.See “Note 2 – Accounting Policies” and “Note 19 – Segment Information.”Our senior housing properties are either operated under triple-net leases in our triple-net leased properties segment or through independent third-party managers in our senior living operations segment.

As of December 31, 2020, we leased a total of 366 properties (excluding properties within our office operations reportable business segment) to various healthcare operating companies under “triple-net” or “absolute-net” leases that obligate the tenants to pay all property-related expenses, including maintenance, utilities, repairs, taxes, insurance and capital expenditures. Our 3 largest tenants, Brookdale Senior Living Inc. (together with its subsidiaries, “Brookdale Senior Living”), Ardent Health Partners, LLC (together with its subsidiaries, “Ardent”) and Kindred Healthcare, LLC (together with its subsidiaries, “Kindred”) leased from us 121 properties (excluding 8 properties managed by Brookdale Senior Living pursuant to long-term management agreements), 12 properties and 32 properties, respectively, as of December 31, 2020.

As of December 31, 2020, pursuant to long-term management agreements, we engaged independent managers, such as Atria Senior Living, Inc. (“Atria”) and Sunrise Senior Living, LLC (together with its subsidiaries, “Sunrise”), to manage the 441 senior housing communities in our senior living operations segment for us.

Through our Lillibridge Healthcare Services, Inc. subsidiary and our ownership interest in PMB Real Estate Services LLC, we also provide MOB management, leasing, marketing, facility development and advisory services to highly rated hospitals and health systems throughout the United States. In addition, from time to time, we make secured and non-mortgage loans and other investments relating to senior housing and healthcare operators or properties.

COVID-19 Update

During fiscal 2020 and continuing into fiscal 2021, the COVID-19 pandemic has negatively affected our businesses in a number of ways and is expected to continue to do so.

Operating Results.Our senior living operations segment was significantly impacted by the COVID-19 pandemic. Occupancy decreased over the course of 2020, while operating expenses increased as our senior living communities responded to the pandemic, resulting in a significant decline in NOI compared to 2019. Our NNN senior housing tenants’ performance was similarly affected by COVID-19. During the course of 2020, we modified certain NNN senior housing leases to reset rent and provided other modest financial accommodations to certain NNN senior housing tenants who needed it as a result of COVID-19. We also wrote-off previously accrued straight-line rental income related to NNN senior housing tenants due to COVID-19.

However, we benefited from our ongoing strategy of diversification, with our office and NNN healthcare businesses demonstrating resilience in the face of the pandemic. The Company’s NNN healthcare tenants benefited from significant government financial support that was deployed early and has partially offset the direct financial impact of the pandemic. Our office operations segment, which primarily serves MOB and research and innovation tenants that were less impacted by the pandemic, delivered steady performance throughout the year.

Provider Relief Grants.In the third and fourth quarter of 2020, we applied for grants under Phase 2 and Phase 3 of the Provider Relief Fund administered by the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services (“HHS”) on behalf of the assisted living communities in our senior living operations segment to partially mitigate losses attributable to COVID-19. These grants
82


are intended to reimburse eligible providers for expenses incurred to prevent, prepare for and respond to COVID-19 and lost revenues attributable to COVID-19. Recipients are not required to repay distributions from the Provider Relief Fund, provided that they attest to and comply with certain terms and conditions. See “Government Regulation—Governmental Response to the COVID-19 Pandemic” in Part I, Item 1 of this Annual Report.

During the fourth quarter of 2020, we received $34.3 million and $0.8 million in grants in connection with our Phase 2 and Phase 3 applications, respectively, and recognized these grants within property-level operating expenses in our Consolidated Statements of Income. Subsequent to December 31, 2020, we received $13.6 million in grants in connection with our Phase 3 applications, which we expect to recognize in 2021. While we have received all amounts under our Phase 2 applications and have begun to receive amounts under our Phase 3 applications, there can be no assurance that our remaining applications will be approved or that additional funds will ultimately be received. Any grants that are ultimately received and retained by us are not expected to fully offset the losses incurred in our senior living operating portfolio that are attributable to COVID-19. Further, although we continue to monitor and evaluate the terms and conditions associated with the Provider Relief Fund distributions, we cannot assure you that we will be in compliance with all requirements related to the payments received under the Provider Relief Fund.

Capital Conservation Actions. In response to the COVID-19 pandemic, we took precautionary steps to increase liquidity and preserve financial flexibility in light of the resulting uncertainty.See “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations—Liquidity and Capital Resources; Recent Capital Conservation Actions.” As of February 16, 2021, we had approximately $3.0 billion in liquidity, including availability under our revolving credit facility and cash and cash equivalents on hand, with 0 borrowings outstanding under our commercial paper program and negligible near-term debt maturing.

Continuing Impact. The trajectory and future impact of the COVID-19 pandemic remains highly uncertain. The extent of the pandemic’s continuing and ultimate effect on our operational and financial performance will depend on a variety of factors, including the speed at which available vaccines can be successfully deployed; the rate of acceptance of available vaccines, particularly among the residents and staff in our senior housing communities; the impact of new variants of the virus and the effectiveness of available vaccines against those variants; ongoing clinical experience, which may differ considerably across regions and fluctuate over time; and on other future developments, including the ultimate duration, spread and intensity of the outbreak, the availability of testing, the extent to which governments impose, roll back or re-impose preventative restrictions and the availability of ongoing government financial support to our business, tenants and operators. Due to these uncertainties, we are not able at this time to estimate the ultimate impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on our business, results of operations, financial condition and cash flows.

We have not identified the COVID-19 pandemic, on its own, as a “triggering event” for purposes of evaluating impairment of real estate assets, goodwill and other intangibles, investments in unconsolidated entities and financial instruments. However, as of December 31, 2020, we considered the effect of the pandemic on certain of our assets (described below) and our ability to recover the respective carrying values of these assets. We applied our considerations to existing critical accounting policies that require us to make estimates and assumptions regarding future events that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities. We based our estimates on our experience and on assumptions we believe to be reasonable under the circumstances. As a result, we have recognized the following charges for the year ended December 31, 2020:

Adjustment to rental income: As of December 31, 2020, we concluded that it is probable we will not collect substantially all rents from certain tenants, primarily within our triple-net leased properties segment. As a result, we recognized adjustments to rental income of $74.6 million for the year ended December 31, 2020. Rental payments from these tenants will be recognized in rental income when received.

Impairment of real estate assets: During 2020, we compared our estimate of undiscounted cash flows, including a hypothetical terminal value, for certain real estate assets to the assets’ respective carrying values. During 2020 we recognized $126.5 million of impairments representing the difference between the assets’ carrying value and the then-estimated fair value of $239.9 million. The impaired assets, primarily senior housing communities, represent approximately 1% of our consolidated net real estate property as of December 31, 2020. Impairments are recorded within depreciation and amortization in our Consolidated Statements of Income and are primarily related to our senior living operations reportable business segment.

Loss on financial instruments and impairment of unconsolidated entities: As of December 31, 2020, we concluded that credit losses exist within certain of our non-mortgage loans receivable and government-sponsored pooled loan investments. As a result, we recognized credit loss charges of $34.7 million for the year ended December 31, 2020 within allowance on loans receivable and investments in our Consolidated Statements of Income. During the fourth
83


quarter of 2020, we received $10.5 million as a principal payment on previously reserved loans. No allowances are recorded within our portfolios of secured mortgage loans or marketable debt securities. In addition, during 2020 we recognized an impairment of $10.7 million in an equity investment in an unconsolidated entity also recorded within allowance on loans receivable and investments in our Consolidated Statements of Income.

Deferred tax asset valuation allowance: During 2020, we concluded that it was not more likely than not that deferred tax assets (primarily US federal NOL carryforwards which begin to expire in 2032) would be realized based on our cumulative loss in recent years for certain of our taxable REIT subsidiaries. As a result, we recorded a valuation allowance of $56.4 million against these deferred tax assets on our Consolidated Balance Sheets with a corresponding charge to income tax benefit (expense) in our Consolidated Statements of Income. We maintained our conclusions regarding the realizability of deferred tax assets as of December 31, 2020.


NOTE 2–ACCOUNTING POLICIES

Principles of Consolidation

The accompanying Consolidated Financial Statements include our accounts and the accounts of our wholly owned subsidiaries and the joint venture entities over which we exercise control. All intercompany transactions and balances have been eliminated in consolidation, and our net earnings are reduced by the portion of net earnings attributable to noncontrolling interests.

U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (“GAAP”) require us to identify entities for which control is achieved through means other than voting rights and to determine which business enterprise is the primary beneficiary of variable interest entities (“VIEs”). A VIE is broadly defined as an entity with one or more of the following characteristics: (a) the total equity investment at risk is insufficient to finance the entity’s activities without additional subordinated financial support; (b) as a group, the holders of the equity investment at risk lack (i) the ability to make decisions about the entity’s activities through voting or similar rights, (ii) the obligation to absorb the expected losses of the entity, or (iii) the right to receive the expected residual returns of the entity; and (c) the equity investors have voting rights that are not proportional to their economic interests, and substantially all of the entity’s activities either involve, or are conducted on behalf of, an investor that has disproportionately few voting rights. We consolidate our investment in a VIE when we determine that we are its primary beneficiary. We may change our original assessment of a VIE upon subsequent events such as the modification of contractual arrangements that affects the characteristics or adequacy of the entity’s equity investments at risk and the disposition of all or a portion of an interest held by the primary beneficiary.

We identify the primary beneficiary of a VIE as the enterprise that has both: (i) the power to direct the activities of the VIE that most significantly impact the entity’s economic performance and (ii) the obligation to absorb losses or the right to receive benefits of the VIE that could be significant to the entity. We perform this analysis on an ongoing basis.

As it relates to investments in joint ventures, GAAP may preclude consolidation by the sole general partner in certain circumstances based on the type of rights held by the limited partner or partners. We assess limited partners’ rights and their impact on our consolidation conclusions, and we reassess if there is a change to the terms or in the exercisability of the rights of the limited partners, the sole general partner increases or decreases its ownership of limited partnership (“LP”) interests or there is an increase or decrease in the number of outstanding LP interests. We also apply this guidance to managing member interests in limited liability companies (“LLCs”).

We consolidate several VIEs that share the following common characteristics:

the VIE is in the legal form of an LP or LLC;
the VIE was designed to own and manage its underlying real estate investments;
we are the general partner or managing member of the VIE;
we own a majority of the voting interests in the VIE;
a minority of voting interests in the VIE are owned by external third parties, unrelated to us;
the minority owners do not have substantive kick-out or participating rights in the VIE; and
we are the primary beneficiary of the VIE.

We have separately identified certain special purpose entities that were established to allow investments in research and innovation projects by tax credit investors (“TCIs”). We have determined that these special purpose entities are VIEs, we are a holder of variable interests and we are the primary beneficiary of the VIEs, and therefore we consolidate these special
84

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

purpose entities. Our primary beneficiary determination is based upon several factors, including but not limited to the rights we have in directing the activities which most significantly impact the VIEs’ economic performance as well as certain guarantees which protect the TCIs from losses should a tax credit recapture event occur.

In general, the assets of the consolidated VIEs are available only for the settlement of the obligations of the respective entities. Unless otherwise required by the LP or LLC agreement, any mortgage loans of the consolidated VIEs are non-recourse to us. The table below summarizes the total assets and liabilities of our consolidated VIEs as reported on our Consolidated Balance Sheets:
December 31, 2020December 31, 2019
Total AssetsTotal LiabilitiesTotal AssetsTotal Liabilities
(In thousands)
NHP/PMB L.P.$649,128 $238,168 $666,404 $244,934 
Other identified VIEs4,095,102 1,653,036 4,075,821 1,459,830 
Tax credit VIEs614,490 204,746 845,229 333,809 

Investments in Unconsolidated Entities

We report investments in unconsolidated entities over whose operating and financial policies we have the ability to exercise significant influence under the equity method of accounting. Under this method of accounting, our share of the investee’s earnings or losses is included in our Consolidated Statements of Income.

We base the initial carrying value of investments in unconsolidated entities on the fair value of the assets at the time we acquired the joint venture interest. We estimate fair values for our equity method investments based on discounted cash flow models that include all estimated cash inflows and outflows over a specified holding period and, where applicable, any estimated debt premiums or discounts. The capitalization rates, discount rates and credit spreads we use in these models are based upon assumptions that we believe to be within a reasonable range of current market rates for the respective investments.

We generally amortize any difference between our cost basis and the basis reflected at the joint venture level, if any, over the lives of the related assets and liabilities and include that amortization in our share of income or loss from unconsolidated entities. For earnings of equity method investments with pro rata distribution allocations, net income or loss is allocated between the partners in the joint venture based on their respective stated ownership percentages. In other instances, net income or loss may be allocated between the partners in the joint venture based on the hypothetical liquidation at book value method (the “HLBV method”). Under the HLBV method, net income or loss is allocated between the partners based on the difference between each partner’s claim on the net assets of the joint venture at the end and beginning of the period, after taking into account contributions and distributions. Each partner’s share of the net assets of the joint venture is calculated as the amount that the partner would receive if the joint venture were to liquidate all of its assets at net book value and distribute the resulting cash to creditors and partners in accordance with their respective priorities. Under the HLBV method, in any given period, we could record more or less income than the joint venture has generated, than actual cash distributions we receive or than the amount we may receive in the event of an actual liquidation.

Redeemable OP Unitholder and Noncontrolling Interests

We own a majority interest in NHP/PMB L.P. (“NHP/PMB”), a limited partnership formed in 2008 to acquire properties from entities affiliated with Pacific Medical Buildings LLC (“PMB”). Given our wholly owned subsidiary is the general partner and the primary beneficiary of NHP/PMB, we consolidate it as a VIE. As of December 31, 2020, third-party investors owned 3.3 million Class A limited partnership units in NHP/PMB (“OP Units”), which represented 31% of the total units then outstanding, and we owned 7.3 million Class B limited partnership units in NHP/PMB, representing the remaining 69%. At any time following the first anniversary of the date of their issuance, the OP Units may be redeemed at the election of the holder for cash or, at our option, 0.9051 shares of our common stock per OP Unit, subject to further adjustment in certain circumstances. We are party by assumption to a registration rights agreement with the holders of the OP Units that requires us, subject to the terms and conditions and certain exceptions set forth therein, to file and maintain a registration statement relating to the issuance of shares of our common stock upon redemption of OP Units.

As redemption rights are outside of our control, the redeemable OP Units are classified outside of permanent equity on our Consolidated Balance Sheets. We reflect the redeemable OP Units at the greater of cost or redemption value. As of December 31, 2020 and 2019, the fair value of the redeemable OP Units was $146.0 million and $171.2 million, respectively.
85

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

We recognize changes in fair value through capital in excess of par value, net of cash distributions paid and purchases by us of any OP Units. Our diluted earnings per share includes the effect of any potential shares outstanding from redemption of the OP Units.

Certain noncontrolling interests of other consolidated joint ventures were also classified as redeemable at December 31, 2020 and 2019. Accordingly, we record the carrying amount of these noncontrolling interests at the greater of their initial carrying amount (increased or decreased for the noncontrolling interests’ share of net income or loss and distributions) or the redemption value. Our joint venture partners have certain redemption rights with respect to their noncontrolling interests in these joint ventures that are outside of our control, and the redeemable noncontrolling interests are classified outside of permanent equity on our Consolidated Balance Sheets. We recognize changes in the carrying value of redeemable noncontrolling interests through capital in excess of par value.

Noncontrolling Interests

Excluding the redeemable noncontrolling interests described above, we present the portion of any equity that we do not own in entities that we control (and thus consolidate) as noncontrolling interests and classify those interests as a component of consolidated equity, separate from total Ventas stockholders’ equity, on our Consolidated Balance Sheets. For consolidated joint ventures with pro rata distribution allocations, net income or loss, and comprehensive income, is allocated between the joint venture partners based on their respective stated ownership percentages. In other cases, net income or loss is allocated between the joint venture partners based on the HLBV method. We account for purchases or sales of equity interests that do not result in a change of control as equity transactions, through capital in excess of par value. We include net income attributable to the noncontrolling interests in net income in our Consolidated Statements of Income and we include the noncontrolling interests share of comprehensive income in our Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income.

Accounting for Historic and New Markets Tax Credits

For certain of our research and innovation centers, we are party to certain contractual arrangements with TCIs that were established to enable the TCIs to receive benefits of historic tax credits (“HTCs”), new markets tax credits (“NMTCs”), or both. As of December 31, 2020, we owned 8 properties that had syndicated HTCs or NMTCs, or both, to TCIs.

In general, TCIs invest cash into special purpose entities that invest in entities that own the subject property and generate the tax credits. The TCIs receive substantially all of the tax credits and hold only a nominal interest in the economic risk and benefits of the special purpose entities.

HTCs are delivered to the TCIs upon substantial completion of the project. NMTCs are allowed for up to 39% of a qualified investment and are delivered to the TCIs after the investment has been funded and spent on a qualified business. HTCs are subject to 20% recapture per year beginning one year after the completion of the historic rehabilitation of the subject property. NMTCs are subject to 100% recapture until the end of the seventh year following the qualifying investment. We have provided the TCIs with certain guarantees which protect the TCIs from losses should a tax credit recapture event occur. The contractual arrangements with the TCIs include a put/call provision whereby we may be obligated or entitled to repurchase the interest of the TCIs in the special purpose entities at the end of the tax credit recapture period. We anticipate that either the TCIs will exercise their put rights or we will exercise our call rights prior to the applicable tax credit recapture periods.

The portion of the TCI’s investment that is attributed to the put is recorded at fair value at inception in accounts payable and other liabilities on our Consolidated Balance Sheets, and is accreted to the expected put price as interest expense in our Consolidated Statements of Income over the recapture period. The remaining balance of the TCI’s investment is initially recorded in accounts payable and other liabilities on our Consolidated Balance Sheets and will be relieved upon delivery of the tax credit to the TCI, as a reduction in the carrying value of the subject property, net of allocated expenses. Direct and incremental costs incurred in structuring the transaction are deferred and will be recognized as an increase in the cost basis of the subject property upon the recognition of the related tax credit as discussed above.

Accounting Estimates

The preparation of financial statements in accordance with GAAP requires us to make estimates and assumptions regarding future events that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities, the disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates.

86

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

Accounting for Real Estate Acquisitions

When we acquire real estate, we first make reasonable judgments about whether the transaction involves an asset or a business. Our real estate acquisitions are generally accounted for as asset acquisitions as substantially all of the fair value of the gross assets acquired is concentrated in a single identifiable asset or group of similar identifiable assets. Regardless of whether an acquisition is considered a business combination or an asset acquisition, we record the cost of the businesses or assets acquired as tangible and intangible assets and liabilities based upon their estimated fair values as of the acquisition date.

We estimate the fair value of buildings acquired on an as-if-vacant basis or replacement cost basis and depreciate the building value over the estimated remaining life of the building, generally not to exceed 35 years. We determine the fair value of other fixed assets, such as site improvements and furniture, fixtures and equipment, based upon the replacement cost and depreciate such value over the assets’ estimated remaining useful lives as determined at the applicable acquisition date. We determine the value of land either by considering the sales prices of similar properties in recent transactions or based on internal analyses of recently acquired and existing comparable properties within our portfolio. We generally determine the value of construction in progress based upon the replacement cost. However, for certain acquired properties that are part of a ground-up development, we determine fair value by using the same valuation approach as for all other properties and deducting the estimated cost to complete the development. During the remaining construction period, we capitalize project costs until the development has reached substantial completion. Construction in progress, including capitalized interest, is not depreciated until the development has reached substantial completion.

Intangibles primarily include the value of in-place leases and acquired lease contracts. We include all lease-related intangible assets and liabilities within acquired lease intangibles and accounts payable and other liabilities, respectively, on our Consolidated Balance Sheets.

The fair value of acquired lease-related intangibles, if any, reflects: (i) the estimated value of any above or below market leases, determined by discounting the difference between the estimated market rent and in-place lease rent; and (ii) the estimated value of in-place leases related to the cost to obtain tenants, including leasing commissions, and an estimated value of the absorption period to reflect the value of the rent and recovery costs foregone during a reasonable lease-up period as if the acquired space was vacant. We amortize any acquired lease-related intangibles to revenue or amortization expense over the remaining life of the associated lease plus any assumed bargain renewal periods. If a lease is terminated prior to its stated expiration or not renewed upon expiration, we recognize all unamortized amounts of lease-related intangibles associated with that lease in operations over the shortened lease term.

We estimate the fair value of purchase option intangible assets and liabilities, if any, by discounting the difference between the applicable property’s acquisition date fair value and an estimate of its future option price. We do not amortize the resulting intangible asset or liability over the term of the lease, but rather adjust the recognized value of the asset or liability upon sale.

In connection with an acquisition, we may assume rights and obligations under certain lease agreements pursuant to which we become the lessee of a given property. We generally assume the lease classification previously determined by the prior lessee absent a modification in the assumed lease agreement. We assess assumed operating leases, including ground leases, to determine whether the lease terms are favorable or unfavorable to us given current market conditions on the acquisition date. To the extent the lease terms are favorable or unfavorable to us relative to market conditions on the acquisition date, we recognize an intangible asset or liability at fair value and amortize that asset or liability to interest or rental expense in our Consolidated Statements of Income over the applicable lease term. Where we are the lessee, we record the acquisition date values of leases, including any above or below market value, within operating lease assets and operating lease liabilities on our Consolidated Balance Sheets.

We estimate the fair value of noncontrolling interests assumed consistent with the manner in which we value all of the underlying assets and liabilities.

We calculate the fair value of long-term assumed debt by discounting the remaining contractual cash flows on each instrument at the current market rate for those borrowings, which we approximate based on the rate at which we would expect to incur a replacement instrument on the date of acquisition, and recognize any fair value adjustments related to long-term debt as effective yield adjustments over the remaining term of the instrument.

87

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

Impairment of Long-Lived and Intangible Assets

We periodically evaluate our long-lived assets, primarily consisting of investments in real estate, for impairment indicators. If indicators of impairment are present, we evaluate the carrying value of the related real estate investments in relation to the future undiscounted cash flows of the underlying operations. In performing this evaluation, we consider market conditions and our current intentions with respect to holding or disposing of the asset. We adjust the net book value of real estate properties and other long-lived assets to fair value if the sum of the expected future undiscounted cash flows, including sales proceeds, is less than book value. We recognize an impairment loss at the time we make any such determination.

If impairment indicators arise with respect to intangible assets with finite useful lives, we evaluate impairment by comparing the carrying amount of the asset to the estimated future undiscounted net cash flows expected to be generated by the asset. If estimated future undiscounted net cash flows are less than the carrying amount of the asset, then we estimate the fair value of the asset and compare the estimated fair value to the intangible asset’s carrying value. We recognize any shortfall from carrying value as an impairment loss in the current period.


We evaluate our investments in unconsolidated entities for impairment at least annually, and whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying value of our investment may exceed its fair value. If we determine that a decline in the fair value of our investment in an unconsolidated entity is other-than-temporary, and if such reduced fair value is below the carrying value, we record an impairment.


We test goodwill for impairment at least annually, and more frequently if indicators arise. We first assess qualitative factors, such as current macroeconomic conditions, state of the equity and capital markets and our overall financial and operating performance, to determine the likelihood that the fair value of a reporting unit is less than its carrying amount. If we determine it is more likely than not that the fair value of a reporting unit is less than its carrying amount, we proceed with the two-step approach to evaluating impairment. First, we estimateestimating the fair value of the reporting unitunit. On January 1, 2020, we adopted ASU 2017-04, Simplifying the Test for Goodwill Impairment, which removes the traditional “Step 2” of the goodwill impairment test that required a hypothetical purchase price allocation. A goodwill impairment, if any, will be recognized in the period it is determined and compare it tois now measured as the amount by which a reporting unit’s carrying value. If the carrying value exceeds its fair value, we proceed with the second step, which requires us to assign the fair value of the reporting unit to all of the assets and liabilities of the reporting unit as if it had been acquired in a business combination at the date of the impairment test. The excess fair value of the reporting unit over the amounts assigned to the assets and liabilities is the implied value of goodwill and is used to determine the amount of impairment. We recognize an impairment loss to the extent the carrying value of goodwill exceeds the implied value in the current period.value.


Estimates of fair value used in our evaluation of goodwill (if necessary based on our qualitative assessment), investments in real estate, investments in unconsolidated entities and intangible assets are based upon discounted future cash flow projections or other acceptable valuation techniques that are based, in turn, upon all available evidence including level three inputs, such as revenue and expense growth rates, estimates of future cash flows, capitalization rates, discount rates, general economic conditions and trends, or other available market data.data such as replacement cost or comparable transactions. Our ability to accurately predict future operating results

and cash flows and to estimate and determine fair values impacts the timing and recognition of impairments. While we believe our assumptions are reasonable, changes in these assumptions may have a material impact on our financial results.


Assets Held for Sale and Discontinued Operations

We sell properties from time to time for various reasons, including favorable market conditions or the exercise of purchase options by tenants. We classify certain long-lived assets as held for sale once the criteria, as defined by GAAP, have been met. Long-lived assets to be disposed of are reported at the lower of their carrying amount or fair value minus cost to sell and are no longer depreciated.

If at any time we determine that the criteria for classifying assets as held for sale are no longer met, we reclassify assets within net real estate investments on our Consolidated Balance Sheets for all periods presented. The carrying amount of these assets is adjusted (in the period in which a change in classification is determined) to reflect any depreciation expense that would have been recognized had the asset been continuously classified as net real estate investments.

We report discontinued operations when the following criteria are met: (1) a component of an entity or group of components that has been disposed of or classified as held for sale and represents a strategic shift that has or will have a major effect on an entity’s operations and financial results; or (2) an acquired business is classified as held for sale on the acquisition date. The results of operations for assets meeting the definition of discontinued operations are reflected in our Consolidated Statements of Income as discontinued operations for all periods presented. We allocate estimated interest expense to discontinued operations based on property values and our weighted average interest rate or the property’s actual mortgage interest.


88

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

Loans Receivable

We record loans receivable, other than those acquired in connection with a business combination, on our Consolidated Balance Sheets (either in secured loans receivable and investments, net or other assets, in the case of non-mortgage loans receivable) at the unpaid principal balance, net of any deferred origination fees, purchase discounts or premiums and valuation allowances. We amortize net deferred origination fees, which are comprised of loan fees collected from the borrower net of certain direct costs, and purchase discounts or premiums over the contractual life of the loan using the effective interest method and immediately recognize in income any unamortized balances if the loan is repaid before its contractual maturity.

On January 1, we adopted ASU 2016-13, Measurement of Credit Losses on Financial Instruments (“ASU 2016-13”). The amendments in ASU 2016-13 require us to evaluate a current estimate of all expected credit losses over the life of a financial instrument, which may result in earlier recognition of credit losses on loans and other financial instruments. Under prior guidance, we generally only considered past events and current conditions in measuring an incurred loss. We will establish a reserve for any estimated credit losses using this model with a corresponding charge to net income. We adopted ASU 2016-13 using the modified retrospective method and we established no reserve upon adoption. Our evaluation of credit losses of loans receivable is based on factors such as corporate and facility-level financial and operational reports, compliance with financial covenants set forth in the applicable loan agreement, the financial strength of the borrower and any guarantor, the payment history of the borrower, current economic conditions and reasonable and supportable forecasts.

Cash Equivalents

Cash equivalents consist of highly liquid investments with a maturity date of three months or less when purchased. These investments are stated at cost, which approximates fair value.

Escrow Deposits and Restricted Cash

Escrow deposits consist of amounts held by us or our lenders to provide for future real estate tax, insurance expenditures and tenant improvements related to our properties and operations. Restricted cash generally represents amounts paid to us for security deposits and other similar purposes.

Deferred Financing Costs

We amortize deferred financing costs, which are reported within senior notes payable and other debt on our Consolidated Balance Sheets, as a component of interest expense over the terms of the related borrowings using a method that approximates a level yield. Amortized costs of approximately $23.0 million, $20.2 million and $18.1 million were included in interest expense for the years ended December 31, 2020, 2019 and 2018, respectively.

Available for Sale Securities

We classify available for sale securities as a component of other assets on our Consolidated Balance Sheets (other than our interests in government-sponsored pooled loan investments, which are classified as secured loans receivable and investments, net on our Consolidated Balance Sheets). We record these securities at fair value and include unrealized gains and losses recorded in stockholders’ equity as a component of accumulated other comprehensive income on our Consolidated Balance Sheets. If we determine that a credit loss exists with respect to individual investments, we will recognize an allowance against the amortized cost basis of the investment with a corresponding charge to net income. We report interest income, including discount or premium amortization, on available for sale securities and gains or losses on securities sold, which are based on the specific identification method, in income from loans and investments in our Consolidated Statements of Income.

Derivative Instruments

We recognize all derivative instruments in other assets or accounts payable and other liabilities on our Consolidated Balance Sheets at fair value as of the reporting date. We recognize changes in the fair value of derivative instruments in other expenses in our Consolidated Statements of Income or accumulated other comprehensive income on our Consolidated Balance Sheets, depending on the intended use of the derivative and our designation of the instrument.

We do not use our derivative financial instruments, including interest rate caps, interest rate swaps and foreign currency forward contracts, for trading or speculative purposes. Our foreign currency forward contracts and certain of our interest rate swaps (including the interest rate swap contracts of consolidated and unconsolidated joint ventures) are designated as effectively hedging the variability of expected cash flows related to their underlying securities and, therefore, also are
89

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

recorded on our Consolidated Balance Sheets at fair value, with changes in the fair value of these instruments recognized in accumulated other comprehensive income on our Consolidated Balance Sheets. We recognize any noncontrolling interests’ proportionate share of the changes in fair value of swap contracts of our consolidated joint ventures in noncontrolling interests on our Consolidated Balance Sheets. We recognize our proportionate share of the change in fair value of swap contracts of our unconsolidated joint ventures in accumulated other comprehensive income on our Consolidated Balance Sheets. Certain of our other interest rate swaps and rate caps were not designated as having a hedging relationship with the underlying securities and therefore do not meet the criteria for hedge accounting under GAAP. Accordingly, these interest rate swaps are recorded on our Consolidated Balance Sheets at fair value, and we recognize changes in the fair value of these instruments in current earnings (in other expenses) in our Consolidated Statements of Income.

Fair ValuesResults of Financial InstrumentsOperations


Fair value is a market-based measurement, not an entity-specific measurement,As of December 31, 2020, we operated through three reportable business segments: triple-net leased properties, senior living operations and office operations. In our triple-net leased properties segment, we determine fair value based oninvest in and own senior housing and healthcare properties throughout the assumptions that we expect market participants would use in pricing the asset or liability. As a basis for considering market participant assumptions in fair value measurements, GAAP establishes a fair value hierarchy that distinguishes between market participant assumptions based on market data obtained from sources independent of the reporting entity (observable inputs that are classified within levels one and two of the hierarchy)United States and the reporting entity’s own assumptions about market participant assumptions (unobservable inputs classified within level three ofUnited Kingdom and lease those properties to healthcare operating companies under “triple-net” or “absolute-net” leases that obligate the hierarchy).

Level one inputs utilize unadjusted quoted prices for identical assets or liabilitiestenants to pay all property-related expenses. In our senior living operations segment, we invest in active markets that we havesenior housing communities throughout the ability to access. Level two inputs are inputs other than quoted prices included in level one that are directly or indirectly observable for the asset or liability. Level two inputs may include quoted prices for similar assetsUnited States and liabilities in active marketsCanada and other inputs for the asset or liability that are observable at commonly quoted intervals,engage independent operators, such as interest rates, foreign exchange ratesAtria and yield curves. Level three inputs are unobservable inputs for the asset or liability, which typically are based onSunrise, to manage those communities. In our office operations segment, we primarily acquire, own, assumptions, because there is little, if any, related market activity. If the determination of the fair value measurement is based on inputs from different levels of the hierarchy, the level within which the entire fair value measurement falls is the lowest level input that is significant to the fair value measurement in its entirety. If the volumedevelop, lease and level of market activity for an asset or liability has decreased significantly relative to the normal market activity for such asset or liability (or similar assets or liabilities), then transactions or quoted prices may not accurately reflect fair value. In addition, if there is evidence that a transaction for an asset or liability is not orderly, little, if any, weight is placed on that transaction price as an indicator of fair value. Our assessment of the significance of a particular input to the fair value measurement in its entirety requires judgmentmanage MOBs and considers factors specific to the asset or liability.

Revenue Recognition

Triple-Net Leased Properties and Office Operations

Certain of our triple-net leases and most of our MOB and life scienceresearch and innovation center (collectively, “office operations”) leases providecenters throughout the United States. Information provided for periodic and determinable increases in base rent. We recognize base rental revenues under these leases on a straight-line basis over the applicable lease term when collectability is reasonably assured. Recognizing rental income on a straight-line basis generally results in recognized revenues during the first half of a lease term exceeding the cash amounts contractually due from our tenants, creating a straight-line rent receivable that is included in other assets on our Consolidated Balance Sheets.

Certain of our leases provide for periodic increases in base rent only if certain revenue parameters or other substantive contingencies are met. We recognize the increased rental revenue under these leases as the related parameters or contingencies are met, rather than on a straight-line basis over the applicable lease term.

Senior Living Operations

We recognize resident fees and services, other than move-in fees, monthly as services are provided. We recognize move-in fees on a straight-line basis over the average resident stay. Our lease agreements with residents generally have terms of 12 to 18 months and are cancelable by the resident upon 30 days’ notice.

Other

We recognize interest“all other” includes income from loans and investments and other miscellaneous income and various corporate-level expenses not directly attributable to any of our three reportable business segments. Assets included in “all other” consist primarily of corporate assets, including discountscash, restricted cash, loans receivable and premiums, usinginvestments, and miscellaneous accounts receivable.

Our chief operating decision makers evaluate performance of the effective interest method when collectibilitycombined properties in each reportable business segment and determine how to allocate resources to those segments, in significant part, based on segment net operating income (“NOI”) and related measures. In addition to the information presented below, see “Note 19 – Segment Information” of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements included in Part II, Item 8 of this Annual Report for further information regarding our business segments and a discussion of our definition of segment NOI. See “Non-GAAP Financial Measures” included elsewhere in this Annual Report for additional disclosure and reconciliations of net income attributable to common stockholders, as computed in accordance with GAAP, to NOI.

46


Years Ended December 31, 2020 and 2019

The table below shows our results of operations for the years ended December 31, 2020 and 2019 and the effect of changes in those results from period to period on our net income attributable to common stockholders.
 For the Years Ended
December 31,
(Decrease) Increase to Net Income
 20202019$%
 (Dollars in thousands)
Segment NOI:    
Triple-net leased properties$673,105 $754,337 $(81,232)(10.8 %)
Senior living operations538,489 630,135 (91,646)(14.5)
Office operations549,375 574,157 (24,782)(4.3)
All other87,021 92,610 (5,589)(6.0)
Total segment NOI1,847,990 2,051,239 (203,249)(9.9)
Interest and other income7,609 10,984 (3,375)(30.7)
Interest expense(469,541)(451,662)(17,879)(4.0)
Depreciation and amortization(1,109,763)(1,045,620)(64,143)(6.1)
General, administrative and professional fees(130,158)(158,726)28,568 18.0 
Loss on extinguishment of debt, net(10,791)(41,900)31,109 74.2 
Merger-related expenses and deal costs(29,812)(15,235)(14,577)(95.7)
Allowance on loans receivable and investments(24,238)— (24,238)nm
Other(707)10,339 (11,046)nm
Income before unconsolidated entities, real estate dispositions, income taxes, discontinued operations and noncontrolling interests80,589 359,419 (278,830)(77.6)
Income (loss) from unconsolidated entities1,844 (2,454)4,298 nm
Gain on real estate dispositions262,218 26,022 236,196 nm
Income tax benefit96,534 56,310 40,224 71.4 
Income from continuing operations441,185 439,297 1,888 0.4 
Discontinued operations— — — nm
Net income441,185 439,297 1,888 0.4 
Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests2,036 6,281 4,245 67.6 
Net income attributable to common stockholders$439,149 $433,016 6,133 1.4 
nm—not meaningful

Segment NOI—Triple-Net Leased Properties

The following table summarizes results of operations in our triple-net leased properties reportable business segment, including assets sold or classified as held for sale as of December 31, 2020, but excluding assets whose operations were classified as discontinued operations:
 For the Years Ended
December 31,
(Decrease) Increase to Segment NOI
 20202019$%
 (Dollars in thousands)
Segment NOI—Triple-Net Leased Properties:    
Rental income$695,265 $780,898 $(85,633)(11.0 %)
Less: Property-level operating expenses(22,160)(26,561)4,401 16.6 
Segment NOI$673,105 $754,337 (81,232)(10.8)
nm—not meaningful
47



In our triple-net leased properties reportable business segment, our revenues generally consist of fixed rental amounts (subject to contractual escalations) received from our tenants in accordance with the applicable lease terms. We report revenues and property-level operating expenses within our triple-net leased properties reportable business segment for real estate tax and insurance expenses that are paid from escrows collected from our tenants.

The Triple-net leased properties segment NOI decrease in 2020 over the prior year is reasonably assured.attributable primarily to the transition of 26 independent living assets at the start of the second quarter 2020 operated by Holiday from our triple-net portfolio to our senior housing operating portfolio, lower rental income from the Brookdale lease modification at the start of the third quarter of 2020, and the COVID-19 related write-off of previously accrued straight-line rental income during 2020 of $67.6 million (non-Holiday assets), partially offset by the $50.2 million impact of terminating the Holiday Lease. We apply the effective interest methodwill continue to try to collect rent on a loan-by-loancontractual basis for the tenants where straight-line rent has been written off, but we have determined that collectability is not probable due to COVID-19.

Occupancy rates may affect the profitability of our tenants’ operations. The following table sets forth average continuing occupancy rates related to the triple-net leased properties we owned at December 31, 2020 and recognize discounts and premiums as yield adjustmentsmeasured over the trailing 12 months ended September 30, 2020 (which is the most recent information available to us from our tenants) and average continuing occupancy rates related loan term.to the triple-net leased properties we owned at December 31, 2019 and measured over the 12 months ended September 30, 2019. The table excludes non-stabilized properties, properties owned through investments in unconsolidated real estate entities, certain properties for which we do not receive occupancy information and properties acquired or properties that transitioned operators for which we do not have a full four quarters of occupancy results.

Number of Properties at December 31, 2020Average Occupancy for the Trailing 12 Months Ended September 30, 2020Number of Properties at December 31, 2019Average Occupancy for the Trailing 12 Months Ended September 30, 2019
Senior housing communities290 82.1 %326 86.0 %
Skilled nursing facilities (“SNFs”)16 82.9 16 87.3 
IRFs and LTACs35 55.7 36 53.6 

Declines in occupancy are primarily the result of COVID-19 impacts to senior housing and SNF operations.     

The following table compares results of operations for our 359 same-store triple-net leased properties. See “Non-GAAP Financial MeasuresNOI” included elsewhere in this Annual Report on Form 10-K for additional disclosure regarding same-store NOI for each of our reportable business segments.
 For the Years Ended
December 31,
(Decrease) Increase to Segment NOI
 20202019$%
 (Dollars in thousands)
Same-Store Segment NOI—Triple-Net Leased Properties:    
Rental income$601,195 $669,510 $(68,315)(10.2 %)
Less: Property-level operating expenses(19,166)(19,198)32 0.2 
Segment NOI$582,029 $650,312 (68,283)(10.5)
nm—not meaningful

The decrease in our same-store triple-net leased properties rental income in 2020 over the prior year is attributable primarily to the COVID-19 related write-off of previously accrued straight-line rental income of $67.6 million during 2020 and lower rental income from the Brookdale lease modification at the start of the third quarter of 2020, partially offset by rent increases due to contractual escalations pursuant to the terms of our leases. We recognizewill continue to try to collect rent on a contractual basis for the tenants where straight-line rent has been written off, but we have determined that collectability is not probable due to COVID-19.

48


Segment NOI—Senior Living Operations

The following table summarizes results of operations in our senior living operations reportable business segment, including assets sold or classified as held for sale as of December 31, 2020.
 For the Years Ended
December 31,
Increase (Decrease) to Segment NOI
 20202019$%
 (Dollars in thousands)
Segment NOI—Senior Living Operations:    
Resident fees and services$2,197,160 $2,151,533 $45,627 2.1 %
Less: Property-level operating expenses(1,658,671)(1,521,398)(137,273)(9.0)
Segment NOI$538,489 $630,135 (91,646)(14.5)

 Number of
Properties at
December 31,
Average Unit
Occupancy
for the Years Ended
December 31,
Average Monthly Revenue Per Occupied Room for
the Years Ended
December 31,
 202020192020201920202019
Total communities432 401 81.7 %86.6 %$4,766 $5,451 
Resident fees and services include all amounts earned from residents at our senior housing communities, such as rental fees related to resident leases, extended healthcare fees and other ancillary service income. Property-level operating expenses related to our senior living operations segment include labor, food, utilities, marketing, management and other costs of operating the properties.

The decrease in our senior living operations segment NOI in 2020 over the prior year is primarily attributable to lower occupancy resulting from the COVID-19 pandemic. In addition, NOI has been negatively impacted by increased operating costs as a result of the COVID-19 pandemic, which is partially offset by the receipt of $35.1 million in grants during the fourth quarter 2020 from HHS under the Provider Relief Fund. We also had more properties in this segment because of the transition of 26 independent living assets at the start of the second quarter 2020 operated by Holiday from our triple-net portfolio to our senior housing operating portfolio and the third quarter 2019 acquisition of 34 Canadian senior housing communities via an equity partnership with Le Groupe Maurice, which contributed to NOI.

The following table compares results of operations for our 335 same-store senior living operating communities.
 For the Years Ended
December 31,
(Decrease) Increase to Segment NOI
 20202019$%
 (Dollars in thousands)
Same-Store Segment NOI—Senior Living Operations:    
Resident fees and services$1,796,135 $1,967,402 $(171,267)(8.7 %)
Less: Property-level operating expenses(1,385,316)(1,376,587)(8,729)(0.6)
Segment NOI$410,819 $590,815 (179,996)(30.5)

nm—not meaningful
 Number of
Properties at
December 31,
Average Unit
Occupancy
for the Years Ended
December 31,
Average Monthly Revenue Per Occupied Room for
the Years Ended
December 31,
 202020192020201920202019
Same-store communities335 335 79.6 %86.9 %$5,765 $5,790 

49


The decrease in our same-store senior living operations segment NOI is primarily attributable to lower occupancy resulting from the COVID-19 pandemic. In addition, NOI has been negatively impacted by increased operating costs as a result of the COVID-19 pandemic, which is partially offset by the receipt of $31.9 million in grants from HHS under the Provider Relief Fund.
Segment NOI—Office Operations

The following table summarizes results of operations in our office operations reportable business segment, including assets sold or classified as held for sale as of December 31, 2020.
 For the Years Ended
December 31,
(Decrease) Increase to Segment NOI
 20202019$%
 (Dollars in thousands)
Segment NOI—Office Operations:    
Rental income$799,627 $828,978 $(29,351)(3.5 %)
Office building services revenue8,675 7,747 928 12.0 
Total revenues808,302 836,725 (28,423)(3.4)
Less:    
Property-level operating expenses(256,612)(260,249)3,637 1.4 
Office building services costs(2,315)(2,319)0.2 
Segment NOI$549,375 $574,157 (24,782)(4.3)
 Number of
Properties at
December 31,
Occupancy at
December 31,
Annualized Average Rent Per Occupied Square Foot for the Years Ended December 31,
 202020192020201920202019
Total office buildings374 382 89.7 %90.3 %$34 $34 
The decrease in our office operations segment NOI in 2020 over the prior year is attributable to assets sold to the Ventas Fund in the first quarter of 2020, lease termination fees received in 2019, and COVID-19 impacts including the write-off of previously accrued straight-line rental income during 2020 and reduced parking revenues. These reduction in NOI were partially offset by active leasing at recently developed and redeveloped properties, improved tenant retention, contractual rent escalators, acquisitions and business interruption insurance proceeds.

The following table compares results of operations for our 355 same-store office buildings.
 For the Years Ended
December 31,
Increase (Decrease) to Segment NOI
 20202019$%
 (Dollars in thousands)
Same-Store Segment NOI—Office Operations:    
Rental income$743,563 $733,482 $10,081 1.4 %
Less: Property-level operating expenses(235,789)(231,946)(3,843)(1.7)
Segment NOI$507,774 $501,536 6,238 1.2 
 Number of
Properties at
December 31,
Occupancy at
December 31,
Annualized Average Rent Per Occupied Square Foot for the Years Ended December 31,
 202020192020201920202019
Same-store office buildings355 355 91.3 %92.2 %$34 $33 
The increase in our same-store office operations segment NOI in 2020 over the prior year is attributable primarily to successful leasing, enhanced tenant retention, continued strong collections through the COVID-19 pandemic and contractual rent escalations.
50



All Other

Information provided for all other segment NOI includes income from loans and investments and other miscellaneous income not directly attributable to any of our three reportable business segments. The $5.6 million decrease in all other segment NOI in 2020 over the prior year is primarily due to reduced interest income from our loans receivable investments from lower LIBOR-based interest rates, repayments of loans outstanding net of new issuances, partially offset by increased management fee revenues from investments in unconsolidated real estate entities. See “Note 6 – Loans Receivable and Investments” of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements included in Part II, Item 8 of this Annual Report.

Interest and Other Income

The $3.4 million decrease in interest and other income in 2020 over the prior year is primarily due to 2019 income from the exercise of warrants related to our research and innovation properties, partially offset by a 2020 reduction of a liability related to an acquisition and interest income on short-term investments.

Interest Expense

The $17.9 million increase in total interest expense in 2020 over the prior year is primarily attributable to an impaired loanincrease of $53.0 million due to higher debt balances, partially offset by a decrease of $35.5 million due to a lower effective interest rate. Our weighted average effective interest rate was 3.5% for 2020, compared to 3.8% for 2019. Capitalized interest for 2020 and 2019 was $9.6 million and $9.0 million, respectively.

Depreciation and Amortization

Depreciation and amortization expense increased during 2020 compared to 2019, primarily due to an increase in real estate impairments during 2020 and asset acquisitions, including the 2019 acquisition of senior housing communities operated by LGM. This is partially offset by the impact of dispositions during 2020. See “Note 1 – Description of Business - COVID-19 Update” for information regarding 2020 real estate impairment charges.

General, Administrative and Professional Fees

The $28.6 million decrease in general, administrative and professional fees in 2020 over the prior year is primarily a result of the capital conservation actions taken during 2020, including the June 2020 elimination of approximately 25% of corporate positions and a reduction in executives’ salaries for the second half of 2020. See “2020 Capital Conservation Actions” for information regarding these measures.

Loss on Extinguishment of Debt, Net

The loss on extinguishment of debt, net in 2020 is due primarily to the extentnotice of redemption of $236.3 million of our estimate3.25% senior notes due 2022. The loss on extinguishment of debt, net in 2019 was due primarily to the redemption and repayment of $600.0 million aggregate principal amounts then outstanding of our 4.25% senior notes due 2022. See “—Liquidity and Capital Resources”.

Merger-Related Expenses and Deal Costs

The $14.6 million increase in merger-related expenses and deal costs in 2020 over the prior year is due primarily to costs incurred as a result of the Brookdale transaction and 2020 expenses related to severance and operator transitions.

Allowance on Loans Receivable and Investments

The allowance on loans receivable and investments in 2020 is due to credit losses on certain of our non-mortgage loans receivable and government-sponsored pooled loan investments, less recoveries received during the year. See “Note 1 – Description of Business - COVID-19 Update” for more information regarding these allowances.

51


Other

The $11.0 million change in other from income in 2019 to an expense in 2020 is primarily due to insurance recoveries received in 2019 and increased corporate-level insurance costs in 2020, partially offset by the change in fair value of stock warrants received in connection with the Brookdale transaction.

Income (Loss) from Unconsolidated Entities

The $4.3 million increase in income (loss) from unconsolidated entities for 2020 over 2019 is primarily due to our share of financial results from our unconsolidated entities in 2020, offset by an impairment of our investment in an unconsolidated operating entity in 2020. See “Note 1 – Description of Business - COVID-19 Update” for information regarding 2020 impairment charges.

Gain on Real Estate Dispositions

The $236.2 million increase in gain on real estate dispositions for 2020 over 2019 is due primarily to our contribution of six properties to the Ventas Fund in 2020.

Income Tax Benefit

The $40.2 million increase in income tax benefit related to continuing operations for 2020 over 2019 is primarily due to a $152.9 million deferred tax benefit related to the internal restructuring of certain U.S. taxable REIT subsidiaries completed within the first quarter of 2020, partially offset by changes in the valuation allowance against deferred tax assets of certain of our TRS entities. The restructuring benefit resulted from the transfer of assets subject to certain deferred tax liabilities from taxable REIT subsidiaries to the entities other than the TRS entities in this tax-free transaction.
Years Ended December 31, 2019 and 2018

Our Annual Report for the year ended December 31, 2019, filed with the SEC on February 24, 2020, contains information regarding our results of operations for the years ended December 31, 2019 and 2018 and the effect of changes in those results from period to period on our net income attributable to common stockholders.

Non-GAAP Financial Measures

We consider certain non-GAAP financial measures to be useful supplemental measures of our operating performance. A non-GAAP financial measure is a measure of historical or future financial performance, financial position or cash flows that excludes or includes amounts that are not so excluded from or included in the most directly comparable measure calculated and presented in accordance with GAAP. Described below are the non-GAAP financial measures used by management to evaluate our operating performance and that we consider most useful to investors, together with reconciliations of these measures to the most directly comparable GAAP measures.

The non-GAAP financial measures we present in this Annual Report may not be comparable to those presented by other real estate companies due to the fact that not all real estate companies use the same definitions. You should not consider these measures as alternatives to net income attributable to common stockholders (determined in accordance with GAAP) as indicators of our financial performance or as alternatives to cash flow from operating activities (determined in accordance with GAAP) as measures of our liquidity, nor are these measures necessarily indicative of sufficient cash flow to fund all of our needs. In order to facilitate a clear understanding of our consolidated historical operating results, you should examine these measures in conjunction with net income attributable to common stockholders as presented in our Consolidated Financial Statements and other financial data included elsewhere in this Annual Report.
52



Funds From Operations and Normalized Funds From Operations Attributable to Common Stockholders

Historical cost accounting for real estate assets implicitly assumes that the value of real estate assets diminishes predictably over time. However, since real estate values historically have risen or fallen with market conditions, many industry investors deem presentations of operating results for real estate companies that use historical cost accounting to be insufficient by themselves. For that reason, we consider Funds From Operations attributable to common stockholders (“FFO”) and normalized FFO to be appropriate supplemental measures of operating performance of an equity REIT. In particular, we believe that normalized FFO is useful because it allows investors, analysts and our management to compare our operating performance to the operating performance of other real estate companies and between periods on a consistent basis without having to account for differences caused by non-recurring items and other non-operational events such as transactions and litigation. In some cases, we provide information about identified non-cash components of FFO and normalized FFO because it allows investors, analysts and our management to assess the impact of those items on our financial results.

We use the National Association of Real Estate Investment Trusts (“Nareit”) definition of FFO. Nareit defines FFO as net income attributable to common stockholders (computed in accordance with GAAP), excluding gains or losses from sales of real estate property, including gains or losses on remeasurement of equity method investments, and impairment write-downs of depreciable real estate, plus real estate depreciation and amortization, and after adjustments for unconsolidated partnerships and entities. Adjustments for unconsolidated partnerships and entities will be calculated to reflect FFO on the same basis. We define normalized FFO as FFO excluding the following income and expense items (which may be recurring in nature): (a) merger-related costs and expenses, including amortization of intangibles, transition and integration expenses, and deal costs and expenses, including expenses and recoveries relating to acquisition lawsuits; (b) the impact of any expenses related to asset impairment and valuation allowances, the write-off of unamortized deferred financing fees, or additional costs, expenses, discounts, make-whole payments, penalties or premiums incurred as a result of early retirement or payment of our debt; (c) the non-cash effect of income tax benefits or expenses, the non-cash impact of changes to our executive equity compensation plan, derivative transactions that have non-cash mark to market impacts on our Consolidated Statements of Income and non-cash charges related to leases; (d) the financial impact of contingent consideration, severance-related costs and charitable donations made to the Ventas Charitable Foundation; (e) gains and losses for non-operational foreign currency hedge agreements and changes in the fair value of financial instruments; (f) gains and losses on non-real estate dispositions and other unusual items related to unconsolidated entities; (g) expenses related to the collateral is sufficientreaudit and re-review in 2014 of our historical financial statements and related matters; (h) net expenses or recoveries related to supportnatural disasters; and (i) any other incremental items set forth in the balancenormalized FFO reconciliation included herein.    

The following table summarizes our FFO and normalized FFO for each of the loan, other receivablesfive years ended December 31, 2020. The decrease in normalized FFO for the year ended December 31, 2020 over the prior year is due to the impact of COVID-19 on our senior housing business and all related accrued interest. When the balanceincreases in interest expense from incremental borrowings arising as a consequence of the loan, other receivablesimpact of COVID-19, partially offset by the positive impact of our third quarter 2019 acquisition of an interest in 34 Canadian senior housing communities via an equity partnership with Le Groupe Maurice.
53


 For the Years Ended December 31,
 20202019201820172016
 (In thousands)
Net income attributable to common stockholders$439,149 $433,016 $409,467 $1,356,470 $649,231 
Adjustments:     
Real estate depreciation and amortization1,104,114 1,039,550 913,537 881,088 891,985 
Real estate depreciation related to noncontrolling interests(16,767)(9,762)(6,926)(7,565)(7,785)
Real estate depreciation related to unconsolidated entities4,986 187 1,977 4,231 5,754 
Gain on real estate dispositions related to unconsolidated entities— (1,263)(875)(1,057)(439)
Gain on re-measurement of equity interest upon acquisition, net— — — (3,027)— 
Impairment on equity method investment— — 35,708 — — 
(Loss) gain on real estate dispositions related to noncontrolling interests(9)343 1,508 18 — 
Gain on real estate dispositions(262,218)(26,022)(46,247)(717,273)(98,203)
Discontinued operations:   
Loss on real estate dispositions— — — — 
FFO attributable to common stockholders1,269,255 1,436,049 1,308,149 1,512,885 1,440,544 
Adjustments:     
Change in fair value of financial instruments(21,928)(78)(18)(41)62 
Non-cash income tax benefit(98,114)(58,918)(18,427)(22,387)(34,227)
Effect of the 2017 Tax Act— — (24,618)(36,539)— 
Loss on extinguishment of debt, net10,791 41,900 63,073 839 2,779 
Gain on non-real estate dispositions related to unconsolidated entities(597)(18)(2)(39)(557)
Merger-related expenses, deal costs and re-audit costs34,690 18,208 38,145 14,823 28,290 
Amortization of other intangibles472 484 759 1,458 1,752 
Other items related to unconsolidated entities(614)3,291 5,035 3,188 — 
Non-cash impact of changes to equity plan(452)7,812 4,830 5,453 — 
Non-cash charges related to lease terminations— — 21,299 — — 
Natural disaster expenses (recoveries), net1,247 (25,683)63,830 11,601 — 
Impact of Holiday lease termination(50,184)— — — — 
Write-off of straight-line rental income, net of noncontrolling interests70,863 — — — — 
Allowance on loan investments and impairment of unconsolidated entities, net of noncontrolling interests34,543 — — — — 
Normalized FFO attributable to common stockholders$1,249,972 $1,423,047 $1,462,055 $1,491,241 $1,438,643 
54


Adjusted EBITDA

We consider Adjusted EBITDA an important supplemental measure because it provides another manner in which to evaluate our operating performance and allserves as another indicator of our credit strength and our ability to service our debt obligations. We define Adjusted EBITDA as consolidated earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization (including non-cash stock-based compensation expense, asset impairment and valuation allowances), excluding gains or losses on extinguishment of debt, our partners’ share of EBITDA of consolidated entities, merger-related expenses and deal costs, expenses related accruedto the reaudit and re-review in 2014 of our historical financial statements, net gains or losses on real estate activity, gains or losses on remeasurement of equity interest is equal to or less than our estimate ofupon acquisition, changes in the fair value of the collateral, we recognize interestfinancial instruments, unrealized foreign currency gains or losses, net expenses or recoveries related to natural disasters and non-cash charges related to leases, and including Ventas’ share of EBITDA from unconsolidated entities and adjustments for other immaterial or identified items. The following table sets forth a reconciliation of net income attributable to common stockholders to Adjusted EBITDA:
 For the Years Ended December 31,
 202020192018
 (In thousands)
Net income attributable to common stockholders$439,149 $433,016 $409,467 
Adjustments:   
Interest469,541 451,662 442,497 
Loss on extinguishment of debt, net10,791 41,900 58,254 
Taxes (including amounts in general, administrative and professional fees)(91,389)(52,677)(37,230)
Depreciation and amortization1,109,763 1,045,620 919,639 
Non-cash stock-based compensation expense21,487 33,923 29,963 
Merger-related expenses, deal costs and re-audit costs29,811 15,246 33,608 
Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests, adjusted for partners’ share of consolidated entity EBITDA(24,381)(16,396)(10,420)
Loss from unconsolidated entities, adjusted for Ventas share of EBITDA from unconsolidated entities59,631 32,462 86,278 
Gain on real estate dispositions(262,218)(26,022)(46,247)
Unrealized foreign currency (gains) losses(439)(1,061)138 
Changes in fair value of financial instruments(21,928)(104)(54)
Non-cash charges related to lease terminations— — 21,299 
Natural disaster expenses (recoveries), net1,203 (25,981)54,684 
Write-off of straight-line rental income from Holiday lease termination49,611 — — 
Write-off of straight-line rental income, net of noncontrolling interests70,863 — — 
Allowance on loan investments and impairment of unconsolidated entities, net of noncontrolling interests23,879 — — — 
Adjusted EBITDA$1,885,374 $1,931,588 $1,961,876 

NOI

We also consider NOI an important supplemental measure because it allows investors, analysts and our management to assess our unlevered property-level operating results and to compare our operating results with those of other real estate companies and between periods on a cashconsistent basis. We providedefine NOI as total revenues, less interest and other income,
55


property-level operating expenses and office building services costs. Cash receipts may differ due to straight-line recognition of certain rental income and the application of other GAAP policies.

The following table sets forth a reserve againstreconciliation of net income attributable to common stockholders to NOI:
 For the Years Ended December 31,
 202020192018
 (In thousands)
Net income attributable to common stockholders$439,149 $433,016 $409,467 
Adjustments:   
Interest and other income(7,609)(10,984)(24,892)
Interest expense469,541 451,662 442,497 
Depreciation and amortization1,109,763 1,045,620 919,639 
General, administrative and professional fees130,158 158,726 145,978 
Loss on extinguishment of debt, net10,791 41,900 58,254 
Merger-related expenses and deal costs29,812 15,235 30,547 
Allowance on loan receivable and investments24,238 — — 
Discontinued operations— — 10 
Other707 (10,339)72,772 
Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests2,036 6,281 6,514 
(Income) loss from unconsolidated entities(1,844)2,454 55,034 
Income tax benefit(96,534)(56,310)(39,953)
Gain on real estate dispositions(262,218)(26,022)(46,247)
NOI$1,847,990 $2,051,239 $2,029,620 
See “Results of Operations” for discussions regarding both segment NOI and same-store segment NOI. We define same-store as properties owned, consolidated and operational for the full period in both comparison periods and are not otherwise excluded; provided, however, that we may include selected properties that otherwise meet the same-store criteria if they are included in substantially all of, but not a full, period for one or both of the comparison periods, and in our judgment such inclusion provides a more meaningful presentation of our portfolio performance.

Newly acquired or recently developed or redeveloped properties in our senior living operations segment will be included in same-store once they are stabilized for the full period in both periods presented. These properties are considered stabilized upon the earlier of (a) the achievement of 80% sustained occupancy or (b) 24 months from the date of acquisition or substantial completion of work. Recently developed or redeveloped properties in our office operations and triple-net leased properties segments will be included in same-store once substantial completion of work has occurred for the full period in both periods presented. Our senior living operations and triple-net leased properties that have undergone operator or business model transitions will be included in same-store once operating under consistent operating structures for the full period in both periods presented.

Properties are excluded from same-store if they are: (i) sold, classified as held for sale or properties whose operations were classified as discontinued operations in accordance with GAAP; (ii) impacted by materially disruptive events such as flood or fire; (iii) those properties that are currently undergoing a materially disruptive redevelopment; (iv) for our office operations, those properties for which management has an impaired loanintention to institute a redevelopment plan because the properties may require major property-level expenditures to maximize value, increase NOI, or maintain a market-competitive position and/or achieve property stabilization; or (v) for the senior living operations and triple-net leased segments, those properties that are scheduled to undergo operator or business model transitions, or have transitioned operators or business models after the start of the prior comparison period.        

To eliminate the impact of exchange rate movements, all portfolio performance-based disclosures assume constant exchange rates across comparable periods, using the following methodology: the current period’s results are shown in actual reported USD, while prior comparison period’s results are adjusted and converted to USD based on the average exchange rate for the current period.

56


Asset/Liability Management

Asset/liability management, a key element of enterprise risk management, is designed to support the achievement of our business strategy, while ensuring that we maintain appropriate and tolerable levels of market risk (primarily interest rate risk and foreign currency exchange risk) and credit risk. Effective management of these risks is a contributing factor to the extentabsolute levels and variability of our FFO and net worth. The following discussion addresses our integrated management of assets and liabilities, including the use of derivative financial instruments.

Market Risk

We are exposed to market risk related to changes in interest rates with respect to borrowings under our unsecured revolving credit facility, our secured construction revolver and our unsecured term loans, certain of our mortgage loans that are floating rate obligations, mortgage loans receivable that bear interest at floating rates and available for sale securities. These market risks result primarily from changes in LIBOR rates or prime rates. To manage these risks, we continuously monitor our level of floating rate debt with respect to total investmentdebt and other factors, including our assessment of current and future economic conditions.
57


The table below sets forth certain information with respect to our debt, excluding premiums and discounts.
 As of December 31,
 202020192018
 (Dollars in thousands)
Balance:   
Fixed rate:   
Senior notes$8,869,036$8,584,056$7,945,598
Unsecured term loans200,000200,000400,000
Secured revolving construction credit facility160,492
Mortgage loans and other1,389,2271,325,854698,136
Variable rate:   
Senior notes235,664231,018
Unsecured revolving credit facility39,395120,787765,919
Unsecured term loans392,773385,030500,000
Commercial paper notes567,450
Secured revolving construction credit facility154,09890,488
Mortgage loans and other702,878671,115429,561
Total$11,983,071$12,245,802$10,829,702
Percent of total debt:   
Fixed rate:   
Senior notes73.9 %70.1 %73.4 %
Unsecured term loans1.7 1.6 3.7 
Secured revolving construction credit facility— 1.3 — 
Mortgage loans and other11.6 10.8 6.4 
Variable rate:   
Senior notes2.0 1.9 — 
Unsecured revolving credit facility0.3 1.0 7.1 
Unsecured term loans3.3 3.1 4.6 
Commercial paper notes— 4.7 — 
Secured revolving construction credit facility1.3 — 0.8 
Mortgage loans and other5.9 5.5 4.0 
Total100.0 %100.0 %100.0 %
Weighted average interest rate at end of period:   
Fixed rate:   
Senior notes3.7 %3.7 %3.8 %
Unsecured term loans3.6 2.0 2.8 
Secured revolving construction credit facility— 4.5 — 
Mortgage loans and other3.5 3.7 4.4 
Variable rate:
Senior notes1.0 2.5 — 
Unsecured revolving credit facility1.0 2.4 3.2 
Unsecured term loans1.4 2.9 3.3 
Commercial paper notes— 2.0 — 
Secured revolving construction credit facility1.9 — 4.1 
Mortgage loans and other1.9 3.4 3.4 
Total3.4 3.5 3.7 

The variable rate debt in the loan exceedstable above reflects, in part, the effect of $146.7 million notional amount of interest rate swaps with maturities ranging from March 2022 to May 2022, in each case that effectively convert fixed rate debt to variable
58


rate debt. In addition, the fixed rate debt in the table above reflects, in part, the effect of $305.9 million and C$145.7 million notional amount of interest rate swaps with maturities ranging from January 2023 to December 2029, in each case that effectively convert variable rate debt to fixed rate debt. See “Note 10 – Senior Notes Payable and Other Debt” of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements included in Part II, Item 8 of this Annual Report.     

The decrease in our estimateoutstanding variable rate debt at December 31, 2020 compared to December 31, 2019 is primarily attributable to reduced borrowings on our revolving credit facility and commercial paper program, partially offset by the change in presentation of the secured revolving construction credit facility to variable rate debt. The secured revolving construction credit facility was previously reflected as fixed rate debt due to an interest rate swap which had effectively converted the associated interest expense from variable to fixed until its expiration in August 2020.

Assuming a 100 basis point increase in the weighted average interest rate related to our variable rate debt and assuming no change in our variable rate debt outstanding as of December 31, 2020, interest expense on an annualized basis would increase by approximately $14.7 million, or $0.04 per diluted common share.

As of December 31, 2020 and 2019, our joint venture partners’ aggregate share of total debt was $271.6 million and $228.2 million, respectively, with respect to certain properties we owned through consolidated joint ventures. Total debt does not include our portion of debt related to investments in unconsolidated real estate entities, which was $213.0 million and $60.6 million as of December 31, 2020 and 2019, respectively.

The fair value of our fixed rate debt is based on current market interest rates at which we could obtain similar borrowings. Increases in market interest rates typically result in a decrease in the fair value of fixed rate debt while decreases in market interest rates typically result in an increase in the loan collateral.fair value of fixed rate date. While changes in market interest rates affect the fair value of our fixed rate debt, these changes do not affect the interest expense associated with our fixed rate debt. Therefore, interest rate risk does not have a significant impact on our fixed rate debt obligations until their maturity or earlier prepayment and refinancing. If interest rates have risen at the time we seek to refinance our fixed rate debt, whether at maturity or otherwise, our future earnings and cash flows could be adversely affected by additional borrowing costs. Conversely, lower interest rates at the time of refinancing may reduce our overall borrowing costs.



To highlight the sensitivity of our fixed rate debt to changes in interest rates, the following summary shows the effects of a hypothetical instantaneous change of 100 basis points in interest rates:
 As of December 31,
 20202019
 (In thousands)
Gross book value$10,458,262 $10,270,402 
Fair value11,550,236 10,784,441 
Fair value reflecting change in interest rates:
-100 basis points12,204,507 11,438,507 
+100 basis points10,951,483 10,196,943 

The change in fair value of our fixed rate debt from December 31, 2019 to December 31, 2020 was due primarily to 2020 senior note issuances, net of repayments, partially offset by the change in presentation of the secured revolving construction credit facility to variable rate debt. The secured revolving construction credit facility was previously reflected as fixed rate debt due to an interest rate swap which had effectively converted the associated interest expense from variable to fixed until its expiration in August 2020.

As of December 31, 2020 and 2019, the fair value of our secured and non-mortgage loans receivable, based on our estimates of currently prevailing rates for comparable loans, was $565.7 million and $710.5 million, respectively. See “Note 6 – Loans Receivable and Investments” and “Note 11 – Fair Values of Financial Instruments” of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements included in Part II, Item 8 of this Annual Report.

As a result of our Canadian and United Kingdom operations, we are subject to fluctuations in certain foreign currency exchange rates that may, from time to time, affect our financial condition and operating performance. Based solely on our results for the year ended December 31, 2020 (including the impact of existing hedging arrangements), if the value of the U.S. dollar relative to the British pound and Canadian dollar were to increase or decrease by one standard deviation compared to the average exchange rate during the year, our normalized FFO per share for the year ended December 31, 2020 would decrease or
59


increase, as applicable, by less than $0.01 per share or 1%. We recognizewill continue to mitigate these risks through a layered approach to hedging looking out for the next year and continual assessment of our foreign operational capital structure. Nevertheless, we cannot assure you that any such fluctuations will not have an effect on our earnings.

Concentration and Credit Risk

We use concentration ratios to identify, understand and evaluate the potential impact of economic downturns and other adverse events that may affect our asset types, geographic locations, business models, and tenants, operators and managers. We evaluate concentration risk in terms of investment mix and operations mix. Investment mix measures the percentage of our investments that is concentrated in a specific asset type or that is operated or managed by a particular tenant, operator or manager. Operations mix measures the percentage of our operating results that is attributed to a particular tenant, operator or manager, geographic location or business model. The following tables reflect our concentration risk as of the dates and for the periods presented:
 As of
December 31,
 20202019
Investment mix by asset type(1):
  
Senior housing communities63.5 %62.2 %
MOBs19.7 19.3 
Research and innovation centers7.1 8.7 
Health systems5.2 5.1 
IRFs and LTACs1.7 1.6 
SNFs0.7 0.7 
Secured loans receivable and investments, net2.1 2.4 
Investment mix by tenant, operator and manager(1):
  
Atria20.8 %20.4 %
Sunrise10.4 10.3 
Brookdale Senior Living8.2 7.7 
Ardent4.9 4.7 
Kindred1.1 1.0 
All other54.6 55.9 

(1)Ratios are based on the gross book value of consolidated real estate investments (excluding properties classified as held for sale) as of each reporting date.
60


 For the Years Ended December 31,
 202020192018
Operations mix by tenant and operator and business model:   
Revenues(1):
   
Senior living operations58.0 %55.8 %55.3 %
Brookdale Senior Living(2)
4.4 4.7 4.3 
Ardent3.2 3.1 3.1 
Kindred3.5 3.3 3.5 
All others30.9 33.1 33.8 
Adjusted EBITDA:  
Senior living operations30.8 %32.5 %31.3 %
Brookdale Senior Living(2)
9.5 8.1 6.7 
Ardent7.0 5.4 5.1 
Kindred7.5 5.8 5.6 
All others45.2 48.2 51.3 
NOI:  
Senior living operations29.4 %31.1 %30.7 %
Brookdale Senior Living(2)
9.0 8.7 7.6 
Ardent6.6 5.8 5.7 
Kindred7.1 6.3 6.4 
All others47.9 48.1 49.6 
Operations mix by geographic location(3):
  
California15.7 %15.9 %15.7 %
New York8.1 8.8 8.4 
Texas6.1 6.0 6.2 
Pennsylvania4.6 4.7 4.6 
Illinois4.1 4.0 4.4 
All others61.4 60.6 60.7 

(1)Total revenues include medical office building and other services revenue, revenue from loans and investments and interest and other income (including amounts related to assets classified as held for sale).
(2)Results exclude eight senior housing communities which are included in the senior living operations reportable business segment. 2018 results include the impact of a net non-cash charge of $21.3 million related to April 2018 lease extensions.
(3)Ratios are based on total revenues (including amounts related to assets classified as held for sale) for each period presented.

See “Non-GAAP Financial Measures” included elsewhere in this Annual Report for additional disclosure and reconciliations of net income attributable to common stockholders, as computed in accordance with GAAP, to Adjusted EBITDA and NOI, respectively.

We derive a significant portion of our revenues by leasing assets under long-term triple-net leases in which the rental rate is generally fixed with escalators, subject to certain limitations. Some of our triple-net lease escalators are contingent upon the satisfaction of specified facility revenue parameters or based on increases in the Consumer Price Index (“CPI”), with caps, floors or collars. We also earn revenues directly from rent,individual residents in our senior housing communities that are managed by independent operators, such as Atria and Sunrise, and tenants in our office buildings. For the year ended December 31, 2020, 61.0% of our Adjusted EBITDA was derived from our senior living operations and office operations, for which rental rates may fluctuate more frequently upon lease terminationrollovers and renewals due to shorter-term leases and changing economic or market conditions.

The concentration of our triple-net leased properties segment revenues and operating income that are attributed to Brookdale Senior Living, Ardent and Kindred creates credit risk. If any of Brookdale Senior Living, Ardent or Kindred becomes unable or unwilling to satisfy its obligations to us or to renew its leases with us upon expiration of the terms thereof, our financial condition and results of operations could decline, and our ability to service our indebtedness and to make
61


distributions to our stockholders could be impaired. See “Risk Factors—Our Business Operations and Strategy Risks—A significant portion of our revenues and operating income is dependent on a limited number of tenants and managers, including Brookdale Senior Living, Ardent, Kindred, Atria and Sunrise.” included in Part I, Item 1A of this Annual Report and “Note 3 – Concentration of Credit Risk” of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements included in Part II, Item 8 of this Annual Report.

We regularly monitor and assess any changes in the relative credit risk of our significant tenants, and in particular those tenants that have recourse obligations under our triple-net leases. The ratios and metrics we use to evaluate a significant tenant’s liquidity and creditworthiness depend on facts and circumstances specific to that tenant and the industry or industries in which it operates, including without limitation the tenant’s credit history and economic conditions related to the tenant, its operations and the markets in which the tenant operates, that may vary over time. Among other things, we may (i) review and analyze information regarding the real estate, senior housing and healthcare industries generally, publicly available information regarding the significant tenant, and information required to be provided by the tenant under the terms of its lease agreements with us, (ii) examine monthly or quarterly financial statements of the significant tenant to the extent publicly available or otherwise provided under the terms of our lease agreements, and (iii) participate in periodic discussions and in-person meetings with representatives of the significant tenant.  Using this information, we calculate multiple financial ratios (which may, but do not necessarily, include leverage, fixed charge coverage and tangible net worth), after making certain adjustments based on our judgment, and assess other metrics we deem relevant to an understanding of the significant tenant’s credit risk.

Because Atria and Sunrise manage our properties in exchange for the receipt of a management fee from us, we are not directly exposed to the credit risk of our managers in the same manner or to the same extent as our triple-net tenants. However, we rely on our managers’ personnel, expertise, technical resources and information systems, proprietary information, good faith and judgment to manage our senior living operations efficiently and effectively. We also rely on Atria and Sunrise to set appropriate resident fees, development services,to provide accurate property-level financials results in a timely manner and otherwise operate our senior housing communities in compliance with the terms of our management advisory servicesagreements and all other income whenapplicable laws and regulations. Although we have various rights as the property owner under our management agreements, including various rights to terminate and exercise remedies under the agreements as provided therein, Atria’s or Sunrise’s failure, inability or unwillingness to satisfy its respective obligations under those agreements, to efficiently and effectively manage our properties or to provide timely and accurate accounting information with respect thereto could have a Material Adverse Effect on us. See “Risk Factors—Our Business Operations and Strategy Risks.” included in Part I, Item 1A of this Annual Report.

We hold a 34% ownership interest in Atria, which entitles us to customary minority rights and protections, as well as the right to appoint two of the six members on the Atria Board of Directors.    

Triple-Net Lease Performance and Expirations

Any failure, inability or unwillingness by our tenants to satisfy their obligations under our triple-net leases could have a material adverse effect on us. Also, if our tenants are not able or willing to renew our triple-net leases upon expiration, we may be unable to reposition the applicable properties on a timely basis or on the same or better economic terms, if at all. Although our lease expirations are staggered, the non-renewal of some or all of our triple-net leases that expire in any given year could have a material adverse effect on us. During the year ended December 31, 2020, we had no triple-net lease renewals or expirations without renewal that, in the aggregate, had a material impact on our financial condition or results of operations for that period. See “Risk Factors—Our Business Operations and Strategy Risks—If we must replace any of our tenants or managers, we may be unable to do so on as favorable terms, or at all, and we could be subject to delays, limitations and expenses, which could adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.” included in Part I, Item IA of this Annual Report.

62


The following criteriatable summarizes our lease expirations in our triple-net leased properties segment currently scheduled to occur over the next 10 years as of December 31, 2020:
Number of
Properties(1)
2020 Annualized Base Rent (“ABR”)(2)
% of 2020 Total Triple-Net Leased Properties Segment Rental Income
 (Dollars in thousands)
2021$12,062 1.7 %
20225,799 0.8 
2023(3)
31,240 4.5 
202426 13,970 2.0 
2025179 234,549 33.7 
202639 53,660 7.7 
20278,784 1.3 
202827 25,196 3.6 
202921 22,788 3.3 
20304,748 0.7 
(1)Excludes assets sold or classified as held for sale, unconsolidated entities development properties not yet operational, unconsolidated joint ventures and land parcels.
(2)ABR represents the annualized impact of the current period’s cash base rent at 100% share for consolidated entities. ABR does not include common area maintenance charges, the amortization of above/below market lease intangibles or other noncash items. ABR is used only for the purpose of determining lease expirations.
(3)Relates to 6 LTACs leased by Kindred. While the lease term expires in 2023, Kindred may extend the term for 5 years by delivering a renewal notice to the Company 12 to 18 months prior to expiration.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

During 2020, our principal sources of liquidity were cash flows from operations, proceeds from the issuance of debt and equity securities, borrowings under our unsecured revolving credit facility, and proceeds from asset sales.

For the next 12 months, our principal liquidity needs are metto: (i) fund operating expenses; (ii) meet our debt service requirements; (iii) repay maturing mortgage and other debt; (iv) fund acquisitions, investments and commitments and any development and redevelopment activities; (v) fund capital expenditures; and (vi) make distributions to our stockholders and unitholders, as required for us to continue to qualify as a REIT. Depending upon the availability of external capital, we believe our liquidity is sufficient to fund these uses of cash. We expect that these liquidity needs generally will be satisfied by a combination of the following: cash flows from operations, cash on hand, debt assumptions and financings (including secured financings), issuances of debt and equity securities, dispositions of assets (in whole or in part through joint venture arrangements with third parties) and borrowings under our revolving credit facilities and commercial paper program. However, an inability to access liquidity through multiple capital sources concurrently could have a material adverse effect on us.

While continuing decreased revenue and net operating income as a result of the COVID-19 pandemic could lead to downgrades of our long-term credit rating and therefore adversely impact our cost of borrowing, we currently believe we will continue to have access to one or more debt markets during the duration of the pandemic and could seek to enter into secured debt financings or issue debt and equity securities to satisfy our liquidity needs, although no assurances can be made in this regard. See “COVID-19 Update.” See “Risk Factors—Our Capital Structure Risks—We are highly dependent on access to the capital markets. Limitations on our ability to access capital could have an adverse effect on us, including our ability to make required payments on our debt obligations, make distributions to our stockholders or make future investments necessary to implement our business strategy.” included in Part I, Item 1A of this Annual Report.

2020 Capital Conservation Actions

In 2020, we executed on a multi-pronged capital conservation strategy to mitigate the impact of COVID-19, which included reducing our planned capital expenditures and capital commitments. We also established a quarterly dividend of $0.45 per share beginning in the second quarter, which was a reduction from the first quarter dividend of $0.7925 per share. This action enabled us to conserve approximately $130 million of cash per quarter compared to the prior dividend level. Also, in June 2020, we eliminated roles representing over 25% of our corporate positions, excluding onsite field personnel. For the
63


second half of 2020, the base salaries of our CEO and other executive officers were voluntarily reduced by 20% and 10%, respectively. Primarily as a result of these capital conservation actions, our 2020 general and administrative expenses are $29 million lower than 2019.

See “Note 10 – Senior Notes Payable and Other Debt” of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements included in Part II, Item 8 of this Annual Report for further information regarding our significant financing activities.

Credit Facilities, Commercial Paper and Unsecured Term Loans

As of December 31, 2020, our unsecured credit facility was comprised of a $3.0 billion unsecured revolving credit facility priced at LIBOR plus 0.875% based on the Company’s debt rating, which was scheduled to mature in 2021. In January 2021, we entered into an amended and restated unsecured credit facility (the “New Credit Facility”) comprised of a $2.75 billion unsecured revolving credit facility initially priced at LIBOR plus 0.825% based on the Company’s debt rating. The New Credit Facility matures in 2025, but may be extended at our option subject to the satisfaction of certain conditions, for two additional periods of six months each. The New Credit Facility also includes an accordion feature that permits us to increase our aggregate borrowing capacity thereunder to up to $3.75 billion.

As of December 31, 2020, $39.4 million was outstanding under the unsecured revolving credit facility with an additional $24.9 million restricted to support outstanding letters of credit. In addition, we limit our utilization of the unsecured revolving credit facility, to the extent necessary, to support our commercial paper program when commercial paper notes are outstanding. We had $2.9 billion in available liquidity under the unsecured revolving credit facility as of December 31, 2020. In connection with the New Credit Facility, we paid off all amounts outstanding under the existing unsecured revolving credit facility as of January 29, 2021 by drawing down the same amount on the New Credit Facility.    

Our wholly owned subsidiary, Ventas Realty, Limited Partnership (“Ventas Realty”), may issue from time to time unsecured commercial paper notes up to a maximum aggregate amount outstanding at any time of $1.0 billion. The notes are sold under customary terms in the United States commercial paper note market and are ranked pari passu with all of Ventas Realty’s other unsecured senior indebtedness. The notes are fully and unconditionally guaranteed by Ventas, Inc. As of December 31, 2020, we had no borrowings outstanding under our commercial paper program.

As of December 31, 2020, we had a $200.0 million unsecured term loan priced at LIBOR plus 0.90% that matures in 2023.  The term loan also includes an accordion feature that effectively permits us to increase our aggregate borrowings thereunder to up to $800.0 million.

As of December 31, 2020, we had a $400.0 million secured revolving construction credit facility with $154.1 million of borrowings outstanding. The secured revolving construction credit facility matures in 2022 and is primarily used to finance the development of research and innovation centers and other construction projects.

As of December 31, 2020, we had a C$500 million unsecured term loan facility priced at Canadian Dollar Offered Rate (“CDOR”) plus 0.90% that matures in 2025.

Senior Notes

In April 2020, Ventas Realty issued and sold $500.0 million aggregate principal amount of 4.75% senior notes due 2030 at an amount equal to 97.86% of par.

In October 2020, we redeemed, pursuant to a cash tender offer, $236.3 million aggregate principal amount then outstanding of our 3.25% senior notes due 2022 at 104.14% of par value, plus accrued and unpaid interest to the payment date. As a result, we recognized a loss on extinguishment of debt of $11.1 million during the year ended December 31, 2020.

As of December 31, 2020, we had outstanding $7.7 billion aggregate principal amount of senior notes issued by Ventas Realty ($263.7 million of which was co-issued by Ventas Realty’s wholly owned subsidiary, Ventas Capital Corporation), approximately $75.2 million aggregate principal amount of senior notes issued by Nationwide Health Properties, Inc. (“NHP”) and assumed by our subsidiary, Nationwide Health Properties, LLC (“NHP LLC”), as successor to NHP, in connection with our acquisition of NHP, and C$1.7 billion aggregate principal amount of senior notes issued by our subsidiary, Ventas Canada Finance Limited (“Ventas Canada”). All of the senior notes issued by Ventas Realty and Ventas Canada are unconditionally guaranteed by Ventas, Inc.

64


In February 2021, in order to reduce near-term maturities, we issued a make-whole redemption for the entirety of the $400 million outstanding aggregate principal amount of 3.10% senior notes due January 2023. The redemption is expected to settle in March 2021 and will be funded primarily with cash on hand.

We may, from time to time, seek to retire or purchase our outstanding senior notes for cash or in exchange for equity securities in open market purchases, privately negotiated transactions or otherwise. Such repurchases or exchanges, if any, will depend on prevailing market conditions, our liquidity requirements, contractual restrictions, prospects for capital and other factors. The amounts involved may be material.

The indentures governing our outstanding senior notes require us to comply with various financial and other restrictive covenants. We were in compliance with all of these covenants at December 31, 2020.

Mortgages

At December 31, 2020 and 2019, our consolidated aggregate principal amount of mortgage debt outstanding was $2.1 billion and $2.0 billion, respectively, of which our share was $1.8 billion for both years.

Under certain circumstances, contractual and legal restrictions, including those contained in the instruments governing our subsidiaries’ outstanding mortgage indebtedness, may restrict our ability to obtain cash from our subsidiaries for the purpose of meeting our debt service obligations, including our payment guarantees with respect to Ventas Realty’s and Ventas Canada Finance Limited’s senior notes.

Derivatives and Hedging

In the normal course of our business, interest rate fluctuations affect future cash flows under our variable rate debt obligations, loans receivable and marketable debt securities, and foreign currency exchange rate fluctuations affect our operating results. We follow established risk management policies and procedures, including the use of derivative instruments, to mitigate the impact of these risks.

Dividends

During 2020, we declared four dividends totaling $2.1425 per share of our common stock, including a fourth quarter dividend of $0.45 per share. In order to continue to qualify as a REIT, we must make annual distributions to our stockholders of at least 90% of our REIT taxable income (excluding net capital gain). In addition, we will be subject to income tax at the regular corporate rate to the extent we distribute less than 100% of our REIT taxable income, including any net capital gains. We intend to pay dividends greater than 100% of our taxable income, after the use of any net operating loss carryforwards, for 2021.

We expect that our cash flows will exceed our REIT taxable income due to depreciation and other non-cash deductions in computing REIT taxable income and that we will be able to satisfy the 90% distribution requirement. However, from time to time, we may not have sufficient cash on hand or other liquid assets to meet this requirement or we may decide to retain cash or distribute such greater amount as may be necessary to avoid income and excise taxation. If we do not have sufficient cash on hand or other liquid assets to enable us to satisfy the 90% distribution requirement, or if we desire to retain cash, we may borrow funds, issue additional equity securities, pay taxable stock dividends, if possible, distribute other property or securities or engage in a transaction intended to enable us to meet the REIT distribution requirements or any combination of the foregoing.

Capital Expenditures

The terms of our triple-net leases generally obligate our tenants to pay all capital expenditures necessary to maintain and improve our triple-net leased properties. However, from time to time, we may fund the capital expenditures for our triple-net leased properties through loans or advances to the tenants, which may increase the amount of rent payable with respect to the properties in certain cases. We may also fund capital expenditures for which we may become responsible upon expiration of our triple-net leases or in the event that our tenants are unable or unwilling to meet their obligations under those leases. We also expect to fund capital expenditures related to our senior living operations and office operations reportable business segments with the cash flows from the properties or through additional borrowings. We expect that these liquidity needs generally will be satisfied by a combination of the following: cash flows from operations, cash on hand, debt assumptions and financings (including secured financings), issuances of debt and equity securities, dispositions of assets (in whole or in part through joint venture arrangements with third parties) and borrowings under our revolving credit facilities.
65



To the extent that unanticipated capital expenditure needs arise or significant borrowings are required, our liquidity may be affected adversely. Our ability to borrow additional funds may be restricted in certain circumstances by the terms of the instruments governing our outstanding indebtedness.

We are party to certain agreements that obligate us to develop senior housing or healthcare properties funded through capital that we and, in certain circumstances, our joint venture partners provide. As of December 31, 2020, we had 13 properties under development pursuant to these agreements, including three properties that are owned by unconsolidated real estate entities. In addition, from time to time, we engage in redevelopment projects with respect to our existing senior housing communities to maximize the value, increase NOI, maintain a market-competitive position, achieve property stabilization or change the primary use of the property.

Equity Offerings

From time to time, we may sell up to an aggregate of $1.0 billion of our common stock under an “at-the-market” equity offering program (“ATM program”). As of December 31, 2020, we have $755.5 million remaining under our existing ATM program. During the years ended December 31, 2020 and 2019, we sold 1.5 million and 2.7 million shares of our common stock under our ATM program for gross proceeds of $44.88 and $66.75 per share, respectively. During the year ended December 31, 2018, we sold no shares of common stock under our ATM program.

In June 2019, we sold 12.7 million shares of our common stock under a registered public offering for gross proceeds of $62.75 per share. We used the majority of the net proceeds to fund our LGM Acquisition. See “Note 4 – Acquisitions of Real Estate Property” of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements included in Part II, Item 8 of this Annual Report for additional information regarding the LGM Acquisition.

Cash Flows

The following table sets forth our sources and uses of cash flows for the years ended December 31, 2020 and 2019:
 For the Years Ended
December 31,
(Decrease) Increase
to Cash
 20202019$%
 (Dollars in thousands)
Cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash at beginning of year$146,102 $131,464 $14,638 11.1 %
Net cash provided by operating activities1,450,176 1,437,783 12,393 0.9 
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities154,295 (1,585,299)1,739,594 nm
Net cash (used in) provided by financing activities(1,300,021)160,674 (1,460,695)nm
Effect of foreign currency translation1,088 1,480 (392)(26.5)
Cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash at end of year$451,640 $146,102 305,538 nm

nm—not meaningful

Cash Flows from Operating Activities

Cash flows from operating activities increased $12.4 million during the year ended December 31, 2020 over the same period in 2019 primarily due to the up-front consideration received in connection with the Brookdale transaction, partially offset by lower NOI.

Cash Flows from Investing Activities

Cash flows from investing activities increased $1.7 billion during 2020 over 2019 primarily due to decreased acquisition and investment activity together with increased proceeds from real estate dispositions.

66


Cash Flows from Financing Activities

Cash flows from financing activities decreased $1.5 billion during 2020 over 2019 primarily due to lower issuances of common stock, decreased debt borrowings during 2020, net of repayments, partially offset by lower dividends paid to common stockholders during 2020.

Contractual Obligations

The following table summarizes the effect that minimum debt (which includes principal and interest payments) and other material noncancelable commitments are expected to have on our cash flow in future periods as of December 31, 2020:
Total
Less than 1 year(3)
1 - 3 years(4)
3 - 5 years(5)
More than 5
years(6)
 (In thousands)
Long-term debt obligations (1) (2)
$15,107,176 $1,002,409 $3,475,813 $3,794,808 $6,834,146 
Operating obligations, including ground lease obligations726,410 26,968 43,352 36,413 619,677 
Total$15,833,586 $1,029,377 $3,519,165 $3,831,221 $7,453,823 

(1)Amounts represent contractual amounts due, including interest.
(2)Interest on variable rate debt based on rates as of December 31, 2020.
(3)Includes $39.4 million of borrowings outstanding on our unsecured revolving credit facility and $235.7 million outstanding principal amount of our floating rate senior notes, Series F due 2021.
(4)Includes $154.1 million of borrowings outstanding on our secured revolving construction credit facility, $263.7 million outstanding principal amount of our 3.25% senior notes due 2022, $196.4 million outstanding principal amount of our 3.30% senior notes, Series C due 2022, $216.0 million outstanding principal amount of our 2.55% senior notes, Series D due 2023, $200.0 million of borrowings outstanding on our unsecured term loan due 2023, $400.0 million outstanding principal amount of our 3.125% senior notes due 2023, and $400.0 million outstanding principal amount of our 3.10% senior notes due 2023.
(5)Includes $400.0 million outstanding principal amount of our 3.50% senior notes due 2024, $400.0 million outstanding principal amount of our 3.75% senior notes due 2024, $471.3 million outstanding principal amount of our 2.80% senior notes, Series E due 2024, $196.4 million outstanding principal amount of our 4.125% senior notes, Series B due 2024, $392.8 million of borrowings outstanding on our unsecured term loan due 2025, $450.0 million outstanding principal amount of our 2.65% senior notes due 2025, and $600.0 million outstanding principal amount of our 3.50% senior notes due 2025.
(6)Includes $4.8 billion aggregate principal amount outstanding of our senior notes maturing between 2025 and 2049. $52.4 million aggregate principal amount outstanding of our 6.90% senior notes due 2037 are subject to repurchase, at the option of the holders, at par, on October 1, 2027, and $22.8 million aggregate principal amount outstanding of our 6.59% senior notes due 2038 are subject to repurchase, at the option of the holders, at par, on July 7 in each of 2023 and 2028.

As of December 31, 2020, we had $6.1 million of unrecognized tax benefits that are excluded from the table above, as we are unable to make a reasonably reliable estimate of the period of cash settlement, if any, with the respective tax authority.

Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements

We own interests in certain unconsolidated entities as described in Note 7 – Investments in Unconsolidated Entities. Except in limited circumstances, our risk of loss is limited to our investment in the joint venture and any outstanding loans receivable. In addition, we have certain properties which serve as collateral for debt that is owed by a previous owner of certain of our facilities, as described under Note 10 – Senior Notes Payable and Other Debt to the Consolidated Financial Statements. Our risk of loss for these certain properties is limited to the outstanding debt balance plus penalties, if any. Further, we use financial derivative instruments to hedge interest rate and foreign currency exchange rate exposure. Finally, at December 31, 2020, we had $24.9 million outstanding letter of credit obligations. We have no other material off-balance sheet arrangements that we expect would materially affect our liquidity and capital resources except those described above under “Contractual Obligations.”

67


Guarantor and Issuer Financial Information

Ventas, Inc. has fully and unconditionally guaranteed the obligation to pay principal and interest with respect to the outstanding senior notes issued by our 100%-owned subsidiary, Ventas Realty, including the senior notes that were jointly issued with Ventas Capital Corporation. Ventas Capital Corporation is a direct, 100%-owned subsidiary of Ventas Realty that has no assets or operations, but was formed in 2002 solely to facilitate offerings of senior notes by a limited partnership. None of our other subsidiaries (excluding Ventas Realty and Ventas Capital Corporation) is obligated with respect to Ventas Realty’s outstanding senior notes.

Ventas, Inc. has also fully and unconditionally guaranteed the obligation to pay principal and interest with respect to the outstanding senior notes issued by our 100%-owned subsidiary Ventas Canada Finance Limited (“Ventas Canada”). None of our other subsidiaries is obligated with respect to Ventas Canada’s outstanding senior notes, all of which were issued on a private placement basis in Canada.

In connection with the acquisition of Nationwide Health Properties, Inc. (“NHP”), our 100%-owned subsidiary Nationwide Health Properties, LLC (“NHP LLC”), as successor to NHP, assumed the obligation to pay principal and interest with respect to the outstanding senior notes issued by NHP. Neither we nor any of our subsidiaries (other than NHP LLC) is obligated with respect to any of NHP LLC’s outstanding senior notes.

Under certain circumstances, contractual and legal restrictions, including those contained in the instruments governing our subsidiaries’ outstanding mortgage indebtedness, may restrict our ability to obtain cash from our subsidiaries for the purpose of meeting our debt service obligations, including our payment guarantees with respect to Ventas Realty’s and Ventas Canada’s senior notes.

The following summarizes our guarantor and issuer balance sheet and statement of income information as of December 31, 2020 and December 31, 2019 and for the years ended December 31, 2020, 2019 and 2018.

Balance Sheet Information
As of December 31, 2020
GuarantorIssuer
 (In thousands)
Assets  
Investment in and advances to affiliates$16,576,278 $2,727,931 
Total assets16,937,149 2,844,339 
Liabilities and equity  
Intercompany loans10,691,626 (4,532,350)
Total liabilities10,918,320 3,577,009 
Redeemable OP unitholder and noncontrolling interests89,669 — 
Total equity (deficit)5,929,161 (732,670)
Total liabilities and equity16,937,149 2,844,339 

68


Balance Sheet Information

As of December 31, 2019
GuarantorIssuer
 (In thousands)
Assets  
Investment in and advances to affiliates$15,774,897 $2,728,110 
Total assets15,875,910 2,838,270 
Liabilities and equity  
Intercompany loans8,789,600 (5,105,070)
Total liabilities9,133,733 3,363,067 
Redeemable OP unitholder and noncontrolling interests102,657 — 
Total equity (deficit)6,639,520 (524,797)
Total liabilities and equity15,875,910 2,838,270 

Statement of Income Information
For the Year Ended December 31, 2020
GuarantorIssuer
 (In thousands)
Equity earnings in affiliates$469,311 $— 
Total revenues474,392 143,259 
Income (loss) before unconsolidated entities, real estate dispositions, income taxes and noncontrolling interests440,210 (215,406)
Net income (loss)439,149 (202,845)
Net income (loss) attributable to common stockholders439,149 (202,845)

Statement of Income Information
For the Year Ended December 31, 2019
GuarantorIssuer
 (In thousands)
Equity earnings in affiliates$362,143 $— 
Total revenues366,243 142,754 
Income (loss) before unconsolidated entities, real estate dispositions, income taxes and noncontrolling interests432,020 (246,929)
Net income (loss)433,016 (246,841)
Net income (loss) attributable to common stockholders433,016 (246,841)

For the Year Ended December 31, 2018
GuarantorIssuer
 (In thousands)
Equity earnings in affiliates$308,764 $— 
Total revenues335,613 139,062 
Income (loss) before unconsolidated entities, real estate dispositions, income taxes and noncontrolling interests400,349 (269,557)
Net income (loss)409,467 (269,557)
Net income (loss) attributable to common stockholders409,467 (269,557)


69


ITEM 7A.    Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
The information set forth in Part II, Item 7 of this Annual Report under “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations—Asset/Liability Management” is incorporated by reference into this Item 7A.

70


ITEM 8.    Financial Statements and Supplementary Data
Ventas, Inc.
Index to Consolidated Financial Statements and Financial Statement Schedules

Consolidated Balance Sheets as of December 31, 2020 and 2019
Consolidated Statements of Income for the Years Ended December 31, 2020, 2019 and 2018
Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income for the Years Ended December 31, 2020, 2019 and 2018
Consolidated Statements of Equity for the Years Ended December 31, 2020, 2019 and 2018
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the Years Ended December 31, 2020, 2019 and 2018
71


MANAGEMENT REPORT ON INTERNAL CONTROL OVER FINANCIAL REPORTING
Our management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting, as defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) under the Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. This system is designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of consolidated financial statements for external purposes in accordance with U.S. GAAP. Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting is not intended to provide absolute assurance that a misstatement of our financial statements would be prevented or detected.

Management, with the participation of the Company’s Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, conducted an assessment of the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting based on the criteria set forth in Internal Control - Integrated Framework (2013) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). Based on this assessment, management has concluded that our internal control over financial reporting was effective at the reasonable assurance level as of December 31, 2020.

The effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2020 has been audited by KPMG LLP, an independent registered public accounting firm, as stated in their report included herein.






72


Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

To the Stockholders and Board of Directors
Ventas, Inc.:

Opinion on the Consolidated Financial Statements

We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Ventas, Inc. and subsidiaries (the Company) as of December 31, 2020 and 2019, the related consolidated statements of income, comprehensive income, equity, and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2020, and the related notes and financial statement schedules III and IV (collectively, the consolidated financial statements). In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of the Company as of December 31, 2020 and 2019, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2020, in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles.

We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (PCAOB), the Company’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2020, based on criteria established in Internal Control – Integrated Framework (2013) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission, and our report dated February 23, 2021 expressed an unqualified opinion on the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting.

Change in Accounting Principle

As discussed in Note 2 to the consolidated financial statements, the Company has changed its method of accounting for leases as of January 1, 2019 due to the adoption of Financial Accounting Standards Board’s Accounting Standards Codification (ASC) Topic 842, Leases.

Basis for Opinion

These consolidated financial statements are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these consolidated financial statements based on our audits. We are a public accounting firm registered with the PCAOB and are required to be independent with respect to the Company in accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) Staff Accounting Bulletin 104: (i)and the applicable agreement has been fully executedPCAOB.

We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and delivered; (ii) services have been rendered; (iii)perform the amount is fixedaudit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the consolidated financial statements are free of material misstatement, whether due to error or determinable; and (iv) collectibility is reasonably assured.

Allowances

Wefraud. Our audits included performing procedures to assess the collectibilityrisks of our rent receivables, including straight-line rent receivables. We base our assessmentmaterial misstatement of the collectibilityconsolidated financial statements, whether due to error or fraud, and performing procedures that respond to those risks. Such procedures included examining, on a test basis, evidence regarding the amounts and disclosures in the consolidated financial statements. Our audits also included evaluating the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of rent receivables (other than straight-line rent receivables)the consolidated financial statements. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

Critical Audit Matters

The critical audit matters communicated below are matters arising from the current period audit of the consolidated financial statements that were communicated or required to be communicated to the audit committee and that: (1) relate to accounts or disclosures that are material to the consolidated financial statements and (2) involved our especially challenging, subjective, or complex judgments. The communication of critical audit matters does not alter in any way our opinion on several factors,the consolidated financial statements, taken as a whole, and we are not, by communicating the critical audit matters below, providing separate opinions on the critical audit matters or on the accounts or disclosures to which they relate.

Probability of collection of substantially all triple-net rents

As discussed in Note 2 to the consolidated financial statements, the Company assesses the probability of collecting substantially all triple-net rents on a lease-by-lease basis. Whenever the results of that assessment, events, or
73


changes in circumstances indicate that it is not probable the Company will collect substantially all triple-net rents under the lease, the Company records a charge to rental income.

We identified the evaluation of the probability of collection of substantially all triple-net rents as a critical audit matter. Complex auditor judgment was required to evaluate the various inputs and assumptions to the collectability assessment, including among other things, payment history, the financial strength of the tenant and any guarantors, and the operating performance of the leased property.

The following are the primary procedures we performed to address this critical audit matter. We evaluated the design and tested the operating effectiveness of certain internal controls over the Company’s evaluation of the inputs and assumptions used in the collectability assessment. To assess the Company’s assumptions about the financial strength of certain tenants and guarantors and the operating performance of the related leased properties, we identified and evaluated the relevance, reliability, and sufficiency of the tenant, guarantor and property financial information; tenant guarantees; the existence of outstanding accounts receivable; and the remaining term of the lease. We compared the Company’s historical determinations to actual collections to assess the Company’s ability to accurately estimate probability of collections.

Impairment of real estate investments in the triple-net leased and senior living operations segments

As discussed in Notes 1, 2, and 5 to the consolidated financial statements, the Company periodically evaluates its long-lived assets, primarily consisting of investments in real estate, for impairment indicators. If indicators of impairment are present, the Company evaluates the carrying value of the related real estate investments in relation to the future undiscounted cash flows of the underlying collateral, if any,operations. In performing this evaluation, the Company considers market conditions and current economic conditions. If ourintentions with respect to holding or disposing of the asset and adjusts the net book value of real estate properties to fair value if the sum of the expected future undiscounted cash flows, including sales proceeds, is less than book value. During the year, impairment indicators arose for certain real estate properties. As a result, recoverability assessments were performed, estimated fair values were determined, and impairment losses were recognized for certain properties.

We identified the evaluation of real estate investments within the triple-net leased and senior living operations segments for impairment as a critical audit matter. Subjective auditor judgment was required in evaluating the Company’s determination of the future undiscounted cash flows and estimated fair values of properties where undiscounted cash flows were less than net book value. In particular, the undiscounted cash flows and fair value estimates were sensitive to significant assumptions, including capitalization rates, projected operating cash flows, and stabilization period. Additionally, subjective auditor judgment and specialized skills and knowledge were needed to evaluate comparable market transactions used by the Company to develop certain fair value estimates due to limited transactional volume.

The following are the primary procedures we performed to address this critical audit matter. We evaluated the design and tested the operating effectiveness of certain internal controls related to the impairment process. This included controls related to the Company’s impairment process and the significant assumptions and fair value estimates described above. To test certain of the Company’s undiscounted cash flow estimates, we evaluated the Company’s forecasts of projected operating cash flows by comparing actual results to the Company’s forecasts adjusted for current market trends. In addition, we involved valuation professionals with specialized skills and knowledge, who assisted in:

●    evaluating the Company’s significant assumptions by comparing the significant assumptions to publicly available market data, and

●    developing independent estimates of fair value for certain properties using comparable market transactions and discounted cash flows developed using the Company’s historical results and publicly available market data.

/s/ KPMG LLP        

We have served as the Company’s auditor since 2014.

Chicago, Illinois
February 23, 2021
74


Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

To the Stockholders and Board of Directors Ventas, Inc.:

Opinion on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting

We have audited Ventas, Inc. and subsidiaries' (the Company) internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2020, based on criteria established in Internal Control – Integrated Framework (2013) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission. In our opinion, the Company maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2020, based on criteria established in Internal Control – Integrated Framework (2013) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission.

We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (PCAOB), the consolidated balance sheets of the Company as of December 31, 2020 and 2019, the related consolidated statements of income, comprehensive income, equity, and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2020, and the related notes and financial statement schedules III and IV (collectively, the consolidated financial statements), and our report dated February 23, 2021 expressed an unqualified opinion on those consolidated financial statements.

Basis for Opinion

The Company’s management is responsible for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, included in the accompanying Internal Control over Financial Reporting. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Company’s internal control over financial reporting based on our audit. We are a public accounting firm registered with the PCAOB and are required to be independent with respect to the Company in accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.

We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material respects. Our audit of internal control over financial reporting included obtaining an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, assessing the risk that a material weakness exists, and testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control based on the assessed risk. Our audit also included performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.

Definition and Limitations of Internal Control Over Financial Reporting

A company’s internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A company’s internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (1) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company; and (3) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the company’s assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.

Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.

/s/ KPMG LLP    

Chicago, Illinois February 23, 2021
75


VENTAS, INC.
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
As of December 31,
20202019
 (In thousands, except per
share amounts)
Assets  
Real estate investments:  
Land and improvements$2,261,415 $2,285,648 
Buildings and improvements24,323,279 24,386,051 
Construction in progress265,748 461,815 
Acquired lease intangibles1,230,886 1,308,077 
Operating lease assets346,372 385,225 
28,427,700 28,826,816 
Accumulated depreciation and amortization(7,877,665)(7,092,243)
Net real estate property20,550,035 21,734,573 
Secured loans receivable and investments, net605,567 704,612 
Investments in unconsolidated real estate entities443,688 45,022 
Net real estate investments21,599,290 22,484,207 
Cash and cash equivalents413,327 106,363 
Escrow deposits and restricted cash38,313 39,739 
Goodwill1,051,650 1,051,161 
Assets held for sale9,608 85,527 
Deferred income tax assets, net9,987 47,495 
Other assets807,229 877,716 
Total assets$23,929,404 $24,692,208 
Liabilities and equity  
Liabilities:  
Senior notes payable and other debt$11,895,412 $12,158,773 
Accrued interest111,444 111,115 
Operating lease liabilities209,917 251,196 
Accounts payable and other liabilities1,133,066 1,145,939 
Liabilities related to assets held for sale3,246 5,224 
Deferred income tax liabilities62,638 200,831 
Total liabilities13,415,723 13,873,078 
Redeemable OP unitholder and noncontrolling interests235,490 273,678 
Commitments and contingencies00
Equity:  
Ventas stockholders’ equity:  
Preferred stock, $1.00 par value; 10,000 shares authorized, unissued
Common stock, $0.25 par value; 600,000 shares authorized, 374,609 and 372,811 shares issued at December 31, 2020 and 2019, respectively93,635 93,185 
Capital in excess of par value14,171,262 14,056,453 
Accumulated other comprehensive loss(54,354)(34,564)
Retained earnings (deficit)(4,030,376)(3,669,050)
Treasury stock, 0 and 2 shares at December 31, 2020 and 2019, respectively(132)
Total Ventas stockholders’ equity10,180,167 10,445,892 
Noncontrolling interests98,024 99,560 
Total equity10,278,191 10,545,452 
Total liabilities and equity$23,929,404 $24,692,208 

  See accompanying notes.
76


VENTAS, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME
For the Years Ended December 31,
202020192018
 (In thousands, except per share
amounts)
Revenues   
Rental income:   
Triple-net leased$695,265 $780,898 $737,796 
Office799,627 828,978 776,011 
1,494,892 1,609,876 1,513,807 
Resident fees and services2,197,160 2,151,533 2,069,477 
Office building and other services revenue15,191 11,156 13,416 
Income from loans and investments80,505 89,201 124,218 
Interest and other income7,609 10,984 24,892 
Total revenues3,795,357 3,872,750 3,745,810 
Expenses   
Interest469,541 451,662 442,497 
Depreciation and amortization1,109,763 1,045,620 919,639 
Property-level operating expenses:
Senior living1,658,671 1,521,398 1,446,201 
Office256,612 260,249 243,679 
Triple-net leased22,160 26,561 
1,937,443 1,808,208 1,689,880 
Office building services costs2,315 2,319 1,418 
General, administrative and professional fees130,158 158,726 145,978 
Loss on extinguishment of debt, net10,791 41,900 58,254 
Merger-related expenses and deal costs29,812 15,235 30,547 
Allowance on loans receivable and investments24,238 
Other707 (10,339)72,772 
Total expenses3,714,768 3,513,331 3,360,985 
Income before unconsolidated entities, real estate dispositions, income taxes, discontinued operations and noncontrolling interests80,589 359,419 384,825 
Income (loss) from unconsolidated entities1,844 (2,454)(55,034)
Gain on real estate dispositions262,218 26,022 46,247 
Income tax benefit96,534 56,310 39,953 
Income from continuing operations441,185 439,297 415,991 
Discontinued operations(10)
Net income441,185 439,297 415,981 
Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests2,036 6,281 6,514 
Net income attributable to common stockholders$439,149 $433,016 $409,467 
Earnings per common share   
Basic:   
Income from continuing operations$1.18 $1.20 $1.17 
Net income attributable to common stockholders1.18 1.18 1.15 
Diluted:
Income from continuing operations$1.17 $1.19 $1.16 
Net income attributable to common stockholders1.17 1.17 1.14 

  See accompanying notes.
77


VENTAS, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME
For the Years Ended December 31,
202020192018
 (In thousands)
Net income$441,185 $439,297 $415,981 
Other comprehensive (loss) income:   
Foreign currency translation3,254 5,729 (9,436)
Unrealized (loss) gain on available for sale securities(3,549)11,634 14,944 
Derivative instruments(17,918)(30,814)10,030 
Total other comprehensive (loss) income(18,213)(13,451)15,538 
Comprehensive income422,972 425,846 431,519 
Comprehensive income attributable to noncontrolling interests3,613 7,649 6,514 
Comprehensive income attributable to common stockholders$419,359 $418,197 $425,005 

See accompanying notes.
78


VENTAS, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF EQUITY
For the Years Ended December 31, 2020, 2019 and 2018
Common
Stock Par
Value
Capital in
Excess of
Par Value
Accumulated Other Comprehensive LossRetained
Earnings
(Deficit)
Treasury
Stock
Total Ventas
Stockholders’
Equity
Non- controlling
Interests
Total Equity
 (In thousands, except per share amounts)
Balance at January 1, 2018$89,029 $13,053,057 $(35,120)$(2,240,698)$(42)$10,866,226 $65,959 $10,932,185 
Net income— — — 409,467 — 409,467 6,514 415,981 
Other comprehensive income— — 15,538 — — 15,538 — 15,538 
Net change in noncontrolling interests— (7,470)— — — (7,470)(16,736)(24,206)
Dividends to common stockholders—$3.1625 per share— — — (1,129,626)— (1,129,626)— (1,129,626)
Issuance of common stock for stock plans, restricted stock grants and other93 34,647 — — (210)34,530 — 34,530 
Adjust redeemable OP unitholder interests to current fair value— (3,323)— — — (3,323)— (3,323)
Redemption of OP Units(383)— — 252 (128)— (128)
Cumulative effect of change in accounting principles— — — 30,643 — 30,643 — 30,643 
Balance at December 31, 201889,125 13,076,528 (19,582)(2,930,214)— 10,215,857 55,737 10,271,594 
Net income— — — 433,016 — 433,016 6,281 439,297 
Other comprehensive (loss) income— — (14,819)— — (14,819)1,368 (13,451)
Net change in noncontrolling interests— (12,332)— — — (12,332)36,174 23,842 
Dividends to common stockholders—$3.17 per share— — — (1,172,653)— (1,172,653)— (1,172,653)
Issuance of common stock3,829 938,509 — — — 942,338 — 942,338 
Issuance of common stock for stock plans, restricted stock grants and other230 61,875 — — (132)61,973 — 61,973 
Adjust redeemable OP unitholder interests to current fair value— (7,388)— — — (7,388)— (7,388)
Redemption of OP Units(739)— — — (738)— (738)
Cumulative effect of change in accounting principle— — (163)801 — 638 — 638 
Balance at December 31, 201993,185 14,056,453 (34,564)(3,669,050)(132)10,445,892 99,560 10,545,452 
Net income— — — 439,149 — 439,149 2,036 441,185 
Other comprehensive (loss) income— — (19,790)— — (19,790)1,577 (18,213)
Net change in noncontrolling interests— 8,227 — — — 8,227 (5,149)3,078 
Dividends to common stockholders—$2.1425 per share— — — (800,475)— (800,475)— (800,475)
Issuance of common stock371 65,640 — — — 66,011 — 66,011 
Issuance of common stock for stock plans, restricted stock grants and other79 22,568 — — 132 22,779 — 22,779 
Adjust redeemable OP unitholder interests to current fair value— 18,638 — — — 18,638 — 18,638 
Redemption of OP Units— (264)— — — (264)— (264)
Balance at December 31, 2020$93,635 $14,171,262 $(54,354)$(4,030,376)$$10,180,167 $98,024 $10,278,191 

   See accompanying notes.
79


VENTAS, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
For the Years Ended December 31,
202020192018
 (In thousands)
Cash flows from operating activities:   
Net income$441,185 $439,297 $415,981 
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities:   
Depreciation and amortization1,109,763 1,045,620 919,639 
Amortization of deferred revenue and lease intangibles, net(40,856)(7,967)(30,660)
Other non-cash amortization20,719 22,985 18,886 
Allowance on loans receivable and investments24,238 
Stock-based compensation21,487 33,923 29,963 
Straight-lining of rental income103,082 (30,073)13,396 
Loss on extinguishment of debt, net10,791 41,900 58,254 
Gain on real estate dispositions(262,218)(26,022)(46,247)
Gain on real estate loan investments(167)(13,202)
Income tax benefit(101,985)(58,918)(43,026)
(Income) loss from unconsolidated entities(1,832)2,464 55,034 
Distributions from unconsolidated entities4,920 1,600 2,934 
Real estate impairments related to natural disasters52,510 
Other(779)13,264 3,720 
Changes in operating assets and liabilities:
Increase in other assets(68,233)(76,693)(23,198)
Increase in accrued interest276 9,737 4,992 
Increase (decrease) in accounts payable and other liabilities189,785 26,666 (37,509)
Net cash provided by operating activities1,450,176 1,437,783 1,381,467 
Cash flows from investing activities:   
Net investment in real estate property(78,648)(958,125)(265,907)
Investment in loans receivable(115,163)(1,258,187)(229,534)
Proceeds from real estate disposals1,044,357 147,855 353,792 
Proceeds from loans receivable119,011 1,017,309 911,540 
Development project expenditures(380,413)(403,923)(330,876)
Capital expenditures(148,234)(156,724)(131,858)
Distributions from unconsolidated entities172 57,455 
Investment in unconsolidated entities(286,822)(3,855)(47,007)
Insurance proceeds for property damage claims207 30,179 6,891 
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities154,295 (1,585,299)324,496 
Cash flows from financing activities:   
Net change in borrowings under revolving credit facilities(88,868)(569,891)321,463 
Net change in borrowings under commercial paper program(565,524)565,524 
Proceeds from debt733,298 3,013,191 2,549,473 
Repayment of debt(479,539)(2,623,916)(3,465,579)
Purchase of noncontrolling interests(8,239)(4,724)
Payment of deferred financing costs(8,379)(21,403)(20,612)
Issuance of common stock, net55,362 942,085 
Cash distribution to common stockholders(928,809)(1,157,720)(1,127,143)
Cash distribution to redeemable OP unitholders(7,283)(9,218)(7,459)
Cash issued for redemption of OP Units(575)(2,203)(1,370)
Contributions from noncontrolling interests1,314 6,282 1,883 
Distributions to noncontrolling interests(12,946)(9,717)(11,574)
Proceeds from stock option exercises15,103 36,179 8,762 
Other(4,936)(8,519)(5,057)
Net cash (used in) provided by financing activities(1,300,021)160,674 (1,761,937)
Net increase (decrease) in cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash304,450 13,158 (55,974)
Effect of foreign currency translation1,088 1,480 (815)
Cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash at beginning of year146,102 131,464 188,253 
Cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash at end of year$451,640 $146,102 $131,464 
80


VENTAS, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS (Continued)
For the Years Ended December 31,
202020192018
(In thousands)
Supplemental disclosure of cash flow information:   
Interest paid including payments and receipts for derivative instruments$429,636 $410,854 $406,907 
Supplemental schedule of non-cash activities:   
Assets acquired and liabilities assumed from acquisitions and other:   
Real estate investments$170,484 $1,057,138 $94,280 
Other assets1,224 11,140 5,398 
Debt55,368 907,746 30,508 
Other liabilities2,707 47,121 18,086 
Deferred income tax liability337 95 922 
Noncontrolling interests20,259 113,316 2,591 
Equity issued30,487 
Equity issued for redemption of OP Units127 907 

See accompanying notes.
81

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS


NOTE 1–DESCRIPTION OF BUSINESS

Ventas, Inc. (together with its subsidiaries, unless otherwise indicated or except where the context otherwise requires, “we,” “us” or “our”), an S&P 500 company, is a real estate investment trust (“REIT”) operating at the intersection of healthcare and real estate, with a highly diversified portfolio of senior housing; life science, research and innovation; and healthcare properties; which we generally refer to as “healthcare real estate,” located throughout the United States, Canada and the United Kingdom. As of December 31, 2020, we owned or managed through unconsolidated real estate entities approximately 1,200 properties and properties classified as held for sale, consisting of senior housing communities, medical office buildings (“MOBs”), life science, research and innovation centers, inpatient rehabilitation facilities (“IRFs”) and long-term acute care facilities (“LTACs”), and health systems. Our company was originally founded in 1983 and is headquartered in Chicago, Illinois with an additional office in Louisville, Kentucky.

We primarily invest in a diversified portfolio of healthcare real estate asset through wholly owned subsidiaries and other co-investment entities. We operate through three reportable business segments: triple-net leased properties, senior living operations, which we also refer to as SHOP, and office operations.See “Note 2 – Accounting Policies” and “Note 19 – Segment Information.”Our senior housing properties are either operated under triple-net leases in our triple-net leased properties segment or through independent third-party managers in our senior living operations segment.

As of December 31, 2020, we leased a total of 366 properties (excluding properties within our office operations reportable business segment) to various healthcare operating companies under “triple-net” or “absolute-net” leases that obligate the tenants to pay all property-related expenses, including maintenance, utilities, repairs, taxes, insurance and capital expenditures. Our 3 largest tenants, Brookdale Senior Living Inc. (together with its subsidiaries, “Brookdale Senior Living”), Ardent Health Partners, LLC (together with its subsidiaries, “Ardent”) and Kindred Healthcare, LLC (together with its subsidiaries, “Kindred”) leased from us 121 properties (excluding 8 properties managed by Brookdale Senior Living pursuant to long-term management agreements), 12 properties and 32 properties, respectively, as of December 31, 2020.

As of December 31, 2020, pursuant to long-term management agreements, we engaged independent managers, such as Atria Senior Living, Inc. (“Atria”) and Sunrise Senior Living, LLC (together with its subsidiaries, “Sunrise”), to manage the 441 senior housing communities in our senior living operations segment for us.

Through our Lillibridge Healthcare Services, Inc. subsidiary and our ownership interest in PMB Real Estate Services LLC, we also provide MOB management, leasing, marketing, facility development and advisory services to highly rated hospitals and health systems throughout the United States. In addition, from time to time, we make secured and non-mortgage loans and other investments relating to senior housing and healthcare operators or properties.

COVID-19 Update

During fiscal 2020 and continuing into fiscal 2021, the COVID-19 pandemic has negatively affected our businesses in a number of ways and is expected to continue to do so.

Operating Results.Our senior living operations segment was significantly impacted by the COVID-19 pandemic. Occupancy decreased over the course of 2020, while operating expenses increased as our senior living communities responded to the pandemic, resulting in a significant decline in NOI compared to 2019. Our NNN senior housing tenants’ performance was similarly affected by COVID-19. During the course of 2020, we modified certain NNN senior housing leases to reset rent and provided other modest financial accommodations to certain NNN senior housing tenants who needed it as a result of COVID-19. We also wrote-off previously accrued straight-line rental income related to NNN senior housing tenants due to COVID-19.

However, we benefited from our ongoing strategy of diversification, with our office and NNN healthcare businesses demonstrating resilience in the face of the pandemic. The Company’s NNN healthcare tenants benefited from significant government financial support that was deployed early and has partially offset the direct financial impact of the pandemic. Our office operations segment, which primarily serves MOB and research and innovation tenants that were less impacted by the pandemic, delivered steady performance throughout the year.

Provider Relief Grants.In the third and fourth quarter of 2020, we applied for grants under Phase 2 and Phase 3 of the Provider Relief Fund administered by the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services (“HHS”) on behalf of the assisted living communities in our senior living operations segment to partially mitigate losses attributable to COVID-19. These grants
82


are intended to reimburse eligible providers for expenses incurred to prevent, prepare for and respond to COVID-19 and lost revenues attributable to COVID-19. Recipients are not required to repay distributions from the Provider Relief Fund, provided that they attest to and comply with certain terms and conditions. See “Government Regulation—Governmental Response to the COVID-19 Pandemic” in Part I, Item 1 of this Annual Report.

During the fourth quarter of 2020, we received $34.3 million and $0.8 million in grants in connection with our Phase 2 and Phase 3 applications, respectively, and recognized these factors indicates it is probablegrants within property-level operating expenses in our Consolidated Statements of Income. Subsequent to December 31, 2020, we received $13.6 million in grants in connection with our Phase 3 applications, which we expect to recognize in 2021. While we have received all amounts under our Phase 2 applications and have begun to receive amounts under our Phase 3 applications, there can be no assurance that our remaining applications will be approved or that additional funds will ultimately be received. Any grants that are ultimately received and retained by us are not expected to fully offset the losses incurred in our senior living operating portfolio that are attributable to COVID-19. Further, although we continue to monitor and evaluate the terms and conditions associated with the Provider Relief Fund distributions, we cannot assure you that we will be unablein compliance with all requirements related to the payments received under the Provider Relief Fund.

Capital Conservation Actions. In response to the COVID-19 pandemic, we took precautionary steps to increase liquidity and preserve financial flexibility in light of the resulting uncertainty.See “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations—Liquidity and Capital Resources; Recent Capital Conservation Actions.” As of February 16, 2021, we had approximately $3.0 billion in liquidity, including availability under our revolving credit facility and cash and cash equivalents on hand, with 0 borrowings outstanding under our commercial paper program and negligible near-term debt maturing.

Continuing Impact. The trajectory and future impact of the COVID-19 pandemic remains highly uncertain. The extent of the pandemic’s continuing and ultimate effect on our operational and financial performance will depend on a variety of factors, including the speed at which available vaccines can be successfully deployed; the rate of acceptance of available vaccines, particularly among the residents and staff in our senior housing communities; the impact of new variants of the virus and the effectiveness of available vaccines against those variants; ongoing clinical experience, which may differ considerably across regions and fluctuate over time; and on other future developments, including the ultimate duration, spread and intensity of the outbreak, the availability of testing, the extent to which governments impose, roll back or re-impose preventative restrictions and the availability of ongoing government financial support to our business, tenants and operators. Due to these uncertainties, we are not able at this time to estimate the ultimate impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on our business, results of operations, financial condition and cash flows.

We have not identified the COVID-19 pandemic, on its own, as a “triggering event” for purposes of evaluating impairment of real estate assets, goodwill and other intangibles, investments in unconsolidated entities and financial instruments. However, as of December 31, 2020, we considered the effect of the pandemic on certain of our assets (described below) and our ability to recover the full value of the receivable, we provide a reserve against the portion of the receivable that we estimate may not be recovered. We base our assessment of the collectibility of straight-line rent receivables on several factors, including, among other things, the financial strength of the tenant and any guarantors, the historical operations and operating trends of the property, the historical payment pattern of the tenant and the type of property. If our evaluationrespective carrying values of these factors indicates it is probableassets. We applied our considerations to existing critical accounting policies that require us to make estimates and assumptions regarding future events that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities. We based our estimates on our experience and on assumptions we will be unable to receive the rent payments due in the future, we provide a reserve against the recognized straight-line rent receivable asset for the portion, up to its full value, that we estimate may not be recovered. If we change our assumptions or estimates regarding the collectibility of future rent payments required by a lease, we may adjust our reserve to increase or reduce the rental revenue recognized in the period we make such change in our assumptions or estimates.

Federal Income Tax

We have electedbelieve to be treated as a REITreasonable under the applicable provisions ofcircumstances. As a result, we have recognized the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the “Code”),following charges for every year beginning with the year ended December 31, 1999. Accordingly,2020:

Adjustment to rental income: As of December 31, 2020, we generallyconcluded that it is probable we will not collect substantially all rents from certain tenants, primarily within our triple-net leased properties segment. As a result, we recognized adjustments to rental income of $74.6 million for the year ended December 31, 2020. Rental payments from these tenants will be recognized in rental income when received.

Impairment of real estate assets: During 2020, we compared our estimate of undiscounted cash flows, including a hypothetical terminal value, for certain real estate assets to the assets’ respective carrying values. During 2020 we recognized $126.5 million of impairments representing the difference between the assets’ carrying value and the then-estimated fair value of $239.9 million. The impaired assets, primarily senior housing communities, represent approximately 1% of our consolidated net real estate property as of December 31, 2020. Impairments are not subject to federal income tax on net income that we distributerecorded within depreciation and amortization in our Consolidated Statements of Income and are primarily related to our stockholders, providedsenior living operations reportable business segment.

Loss on financial instruments and impairment of unconsolidated entities: As of December 31, 2020, we concluded that we continue to qualify as a REIT. However, with respect tocredit losses exist within certain of our subsidiariesnon-mortgage loans receivable and government-sponsored pooled loan investments. As a result, we recognized credit loss charges of $34.7 million for the year ended December 31, 2020 within allowance on loans receivable and investments in our Consolidated Statements of Income. During the fourth
83


quarter of 2020, we received $10.5 million as a principal payment on previously reserved loans. No allowances are recorded within our portfolios of secured mortgage loans or marketable debt securities. In addition, during 2020 we recognized an impairment of $10.7 million in an equity investment in an unconsolidated entity also recorded within allowance on loans receivable and investments in our Consolidated Statements of Income.

Deferred tax asset valuation allowance: During 2020, we concluded that have elected to be treated as taxable REIT subsidiaries (“TRS” or “TRS entities”), we record income tax expense or benefit, as those entities are subject to federal income tax similar to regular corporations. Certain foreign subsidiaries are subject to foreign income tax, although they didit was not elect to be treated as TRSs.

We account for deferred income taxes using the asset and liability method and recognizemore likely than not that deferred tax assets and liabilities(primarily US federal NOL carryforwards which begin to expire in 2032) would be realized based on our cumulative loss in recent years for the expected future tax consequencescertain of events that have been included in our financial statements or tax returns. Under this method,taxable REIT subsidiaries. As a result, we determinerecorded a valuation allowance of $56.4 million against these deferred tax assets on our Consolidated Balance Sheets with a corresponding charge to income tax benefit (expense) in our Consolidated Statements of Income. We maintained our conclusions regarding the realizability of deferred tax assets as of December 31, 2020.


NOTE 2–ACCOUNTING POLICIES

Principles of Consolidation

The accompanying Consolidated Financial Statements include our accounts and liabilitiesthe accounts of our wholly owned subsidiaries and the joint venture entities over which we exercise control. All intercompany transactions and balances have been eliminated in consolidation, and our net earnings are reduced by the portion of net earnings attributable to noncontrolling interests.

U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (“GAAP”) require us to identify entities for which control is achieved through means other than voting rights and to determine which business enterprise is the primary beneficiary of variable interest entities (“VIEs”). A VIE is broadly defined as an entity with one or more of the following characteristics: (a) the total equity investment at risk is insufficient to finance the entity’s activities without additional subordinated financial support; (b) as a group, the holders of the equity investment at risk lack (i) the ability to make decisions about the entity’s activities through voting or similar rights, (ii) the obligation to absorb the expected losses of the entity, or (iii) the right to receive the expected residual returns of the entity; and (c) the equity investors have voting rights that are not proportional to their economic interests, and substantially all of the entity’s activities either involve, or are conducted on behalf of, an investor that has disproportionately few voting rights. We consolidate our investment in a VIE when we determine that we are its primary beneficiary. We may change our original assessment of a VIE upon subsequent events such as the modification of contractual arrangements that affects the characteristics or adequacy of the entity’s equity investments at risk and the disposition of all or a portion of an interest held by the primary beneficiary.

We identify the primary beneficiary of a VIE as the enterprise that has both: (i) the power to direct the activities of the VIE that most significantly impact the entity’s economic performance and (ii) the obligation to absorb losses or the right to receive benefits of the VIE that could be significant to the entity. We perform this analysis on an ongoing basis.

As it relates to investments in joint ventures, GAAP may preclude consolidation by the sole general partner in certain circumstances based on the differences betweentype of rights held by the financial reportinglimited partner or partners. We assess limited partners’ rights and tax basestheir impact on our consolidation conclusions, and we reassess if there is a change to the terms or in the exercisability of assets and liabilities using enacted tax rates in effect for the year in whichrights of the differences are expected to reverse. Anylimited partners, the sole general partner increases or decreases its ownership of limited partnership (“LP”) interests or there is an increase or decrease in the deferrednumber of outstanding LP interests. We also apply this guidance to managing member interests in limited liability companies (“LLCs”).

We consolidate several VIEs that share the following common characteristics:

the VIE is in the legal form of an LP or LLC;
the VIE was designed to own and manage its underlying real estate investments;
we are the general partner or managing member of the VIE;
we own a majority of the voting interests in the VIE;
a minority of voting interests in the VIE are owned by external third parties, unrelated to us;
the minority owners do not have substantive kick-out or participating rights in the VIE; and
we are the primary beneficiary of the VIE.

We have separately identified certain special purpose entities that were established to allow investments in research and innovation projects by tax liabilitycredit investors (“TCIs”). We have determined that resultsthese special purpose entities are VIEs, we are a holder of variable interests and we are the primary beneficiary of the VIEs, and therefore we consolidate these special
84

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

purpose entities. Our primary beneficiary determination is based upon several factors, including but not limited to the rights we have in directing the activities which most significantly impact the VIEs’ economic performance as well as certain guarantees which protect the TCIs from losses should a changetax credit recapture event occur.

In general, the assets of the consolidated VIEs are available only for the settlement of the obligations of the respective entities. Unless otherwise required by the LP or LLC agreement, any mortgage loans of the consolidated VIEs are non-recourse to us. The table below summarizes the total assets and liabilities of our consolidated VIEs as reported on our Consolidated Balance Sheets:
December 31, 2020December 31, 2019
Total AssetsTotal LiabilitiesTotal AssetsTotal Liabilities
(In thousands)
NHP/PMB L.P.$649,128 $238,168 $666,404 $244,934 
Other identified VIEs4,095,102 1,653,036 4,075,821 1,459,830 
Tax credit VIEs614,490 204,746 845,229 333,809 

Investments in circumstances,Unconsolidated Entities

We report investments in unconsolidated entities over whose operating and that causes usfinancial policies we have the ability to changeexercise significant influence under the equity method of accounting. Under this method of accounting, our judgment about expected future tax consequencesshare of events,the investee’s earnings or losses is included in our Consolidated Statements of Income.

We base the initial carrying value of investments in unconsolidated entities on the fair value of the assets at the time we acquired the joint venture interest. We estimate fair values for our equity method investments based on discounted cash flow models that include all estimated cash inflows and outflows over a specified holding period and, where applicable, any estimated debt premiums or discounts. The capitalization rates, discount rates and credit spreads we use in these models are based upon assumptions that we believe to be within a reasonable range of current market rates for the respective investments.

We generally amortize any difference between our cost basis and the basis reflected at the joint venture level, if any, over the lives of the related assets and liabilities and include that amortization in our share of income or loss from unconsolidated entities. For earnings of equity method investments with pro rata distribution allocations, net income or loss is allocated between the partners in the joint venture based on their respective stated ownership percentages. In other instances, net income or loss may be allocated between the partners in the joint venture based on the hypothetical liquidation at book value method (the “HLBV method”). Under the HLBV method, net income or loss is allocated between the partners based on the difference between each partner’s claim on the net assets of the joint venture at the end and beginning of the period, after taking into account contributions and distributions. Each partner’s share of the net assets of the joint venture is calculated as the amount that the partner would receive if the joint venture were to liquidate all of its assets at net book value and distribute the resulting cash to creditors and partners in accordance with their respective priorities. Under the HLBV method, in any given period, we could record more or less income than the joint venture has generated, than actual cash distributions we receive or than the amount we may receive in the event of an actual liquidation.

Redeemable OP Unitholder and Noncontrolling Interests

We own a majority interest in NHP/PMB L.P. (“NHP/PMB”), a limited partnership formed in 2008 to acquire properties from entities affiliated with Pacific Medical Buildings LLC (“PMB”). Given our wholly owned subsidiary is the general partner and the primary beneficiary of NHP/PMB, we consolidate it as a VIE. As of December 31, 2020, third-party investors owned 3.3 million Class A limited partnership units in NHP/PMB (“OP Units”), which represented 31% of the total units then outstanding, and we owned 7.3 million Class B limited partnership units in NHP/PMB, representing the remaining 69%. At any time following the first anniversary of the date of their issuance, the OP Units may be redeemed at the election of the holder for cash or, at our option, 0.9051 shares of our common stock per OP Unit, subject to further adjustment in certain circumstances. We are party by assumption to a registration rights agreement with the holders of the OP Units that requires us, subject to the terms and conditions and certain exceptions set forth therein, to file and maintain a registration statement relating to the issuance of shares of our common stock upon redemption of OP Units.

As redemption rights are outside of our control, the redeemable OP Units are classified outside of permanent equity on our Consolidated Balance Sheets. We reflect the redeemable OP Units at the greater of cost or redemption value. As of December 31, 2020 and 2019, the fair value of the redeemable OP Units was $146.0 million and $171.2 million, respectively.
85

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

We recognize changes in fair value through capital in excess of par value, net of cash distributions paid and purchases by us of any OP Units. Our diluted earnings per share includes the effect of any potential shares outstanding from redemption of the OP Units.

Certain noncontrolling interests of other consolidated joint ventures were also classified as redeemable at December 31, 2020 and 2019. Accordingly, we record the carrying amount of these noncontrolling interests at the greater of their initial carrying amount (increased or decreased for the noncontrolling interests’ share of net income or loss and distributions) or the redemption value. Our joint venture partners have certain redemption rights with respect to their noncontrolling interests in these joint ventures that are outside of our control, and the redeemable noncontrolling interests are classified outside of permanent equity on our Consolidated Balance Sheets. We recognize changes in the carrying value of redeemable noncontrolling interests through capital in excess of par value.

Noncontrolling Interests

Excluding the redeemable noncontrolling interests described above, we present the portion of any equity that we do not own in entities that we control (and thus consolidate) as noncontrolling interests and classify those interests as a component of consolidated equity, separate from total Ventas stockholders’ equity, on our Consolidated Balance Sheets. For consolidated joint ventures with pro rata distribution allocations, net income or loss, and comprehensive income, is allocated between the joint venture partners based on their respective stated ownership percentages. In other cases, net income or loss is allocated between the joint venture partners based on the HLBV method. We account for purchases or sales of equity interests that do not result in a change of control as equity transactions, through capital in excess of par value. We include net income attributable to the noncontrolling interests in net income in our Consolidated Statements of Income and we include the noncontrolling interests share of comprehensive income in our Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income.

Accounting for Historic and New Markets Tax Credits

For certain of our research and innovation centers, we are party to certain contractual arrangements with TCIs that were established to enable the TCIs to receive benefits of historic tax credits (“HTCs”), new markets tax credits (“NMTCs”), or both. As of December 31, 2020, we owned 8 properties that had syndicated HTCs or NMTCs, or both, to TCIs.

In general, TCIs invest cash into special purpose entities that invest in entities that own the subject property and generate the tax provision when such changes occur. Deferred income taxes also reflectcredits. The TCIs receive substantially all of the impacttax credits and hold only a nominal interest in the economic risk and benefits of operating lossthe special purpose entities.

HTCs are delivered to the TCIs upon substantial completion of the project. NMTCs are allowed for up to 39% of a qualified investment and are delivered to the TCIs after the investment has been funded and spent on a qualified business. HTCs are subject to 20% recapture per year beginning one year after the completion of the historic rehabilitation of the subject property. NMTCs are subject to 100% recapture until the end of the seventh year following the qualifying investment. We have provided the TCIs with certain guarantees which protect the TCIs from losses should a tax credit carryforwards. A valuation allowance is provided ifrecapture event occur. The contractual arrangements with the TCIs include a put/call provision whereby we believe it is more likely than notmay be obligated or entitled to repurchase the interest of the TCIs in the special purpose entities at the end of the tax credit recapture period. We anticipate that alleither the TCIs will exercise their put rights or somewe will exercise our call rights prior to the applicable tax credit recapture periods.

The portion of the deferredTCI’s investment that is attributed to the put is recorded at fair value at inception in accounts payable and other liabilities on our Consolidated Balance Sheets, and is accreted to the expected put price as interest expense in our Consolidated Statements of Income over the recapture period. The remaining balance of the TCI’s investment is initially recorded in accounts payable and other liabilities on our Consolidated Balance Sheets and will be relieved upon delivery of the tax asset will not be realized. Any increase or decreasecredit to the TCI, as a reduction in the valuation allowance that results from a changecarrying value of the subject property, net of allocated expenses. Direct and incremental costs incurred in circumstances,structuring the transaction are deferred and that causes us to change our judgment aboutwill be recognized as an increase in the realizabilitycost basis of the subject property upon the recognition of the related deferred tax credit as discussed above.

Accounting Estimates

The preparation of financial statements in accordance with GAAP requires us to make estimates and assumptions regarding future events that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities, the disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates.

86

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

Accounting for Real Estate Acquisitions

When we acquire real estate, we first make reasonable judgments about whether the transaction involves an asset or a business. Our real estate acquisitions are generally accounted for as asset acquisitions as substantially all of the fair value of the gross assets acquired is includedconcentrated in a single identifiable asset or group of similar identifiable assets. Regardless of whether an acquisition is considered a business combination or an asset acquisition, we record the cost of the businesses or assets acquired as tangible and intangible assets and liabilities based upon their estimated fair values as of the acquisition date.

We estimate the fair value of buildings acquired on an as-if-vacant basis or replacement cost basis and depreciate the building value over the estimated remaining life of the building, generally not to exceed 35 years. We determine the fair value of other fixed assets, such as site improvements and furniture, fixtures and equipment, based upon the replacement cost and depreciate such value over the assets’ estimated remaining useful lives as determined at the applicable acquisition date. We determine the value of land either by considering the sales prices of similar properties in recent transactions or based on internal analyses of recently acquired and existing comparable properties within our portfolio. We generally determine the value of construction in progress based upon the replacement cost. However, for certain acquired properties that are part of a ground-up development, we determine fair value by using the same valuation approach as for all other properties and deducting the estimated cost to complete the development. During the remaining construction period, we capitalize project costs until the development has reached substantial completion. Construction in progress, including capitalized interest, is not depreciated until the development has reached substantial completion.

Intangibles primarily include the value of in-place leases and acquired lease contracts. We include all lease-related intangible assets and liabilities within acquired lease intangibles and accounts payable and other liabilities, respectively, on our Consolidated Balance Sheets.

The fair value of acquired lease-related intangibles, if any, reflects: (i) the estimated value of any above or below market leases, determined by discounting the difference between the estimated market rent and in-place lease rent; and (ii) the estimated value of in-place leases related to the cost to obtain tenants, including leasing commissions, and an estimated value of the absorption period to reflect the value of the rent and recovery costs foregone during a reasonable lease-up period as if the acquired space was vacant. We amortize any acquired lease-related intangibles to revenue or amortization expense over the remaining life of the associated lease plus any assumed bargain renewal periods. If a lease is terminated prior to its stated expiration or not renewed upon expiration, we recognize all unamortized amounts of lease-related intangibles associated with that lease in operations over the shortened lease term.

We estimate the fair value of purchase option intangible assets and liabilities, if any, by discounting the difference between the applicable property’s acquisition date fair value and an estimate of its future option price. We do not amortize the resulting intangible asset or liability over the term of the lease, but rather adjust the recognized value of the asset or liability upon sale.

In connection with an acquisition, we may assume rights and obligations under certain lease agreements pursuant to which we become the lessee of a given property. We generally assume the lease classification previously determined by the prior lessee absent a modification in the tax provision when such changes occur.assumed lease agreement. We assess assumed operating leases, including ground leases, to determine whether the lease terms are favorable or unfavorable to us given current market conditions on the acquisition date. To the extent the lease terms are favorable or unfavorable to us relative to market conditions on the acquisition date, we recognize an intangible asset or liability at fair value and amortize that asset or liability to interest or rental expense in our Consolidated Statements of Income over the applicable lease term. Where we are the lessee, we record the acquisition date values of leases, including any above or below market value, within operating lease assets and operating lease liabilities on our Consolidated Balance Sheets.


We estimate the fair value of noncontrolling interests assumed consistent with the manner in which we value all of the underlying assets and liabilities.

We calculate the fair value of long-term assumed debt by discounting the remaining contractual cash flows on each instrument at the current market rate for those borrowings, which we approximate based on the rate at which we would expect to incur a replacement instrument on the date of acquisition, and recognize any fair value adjustments related to long-term debt as effective yield adjustments over the remaining term of the instrument.

87

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

Impairment of Long-Lived and Intangible Assets

We periodically evaluate our long-lived assets, primarily consisting of investments in real estate, for impairment indicators. If indicators of impairment are present, we evaluate the carrying value of the related real estate investments in relation to the future undiscounted cash flows of the underlying operations. In performing this evaluation, we consider market conditions and our current intentions with respect to holding or disposing of the asset. We adjust the net book value of real estate properties and other long-lived assets to fair value if the sum of the expected future undiscounted cash flows, including sales proceeds, is less than book value. We recognize an impairment loss at the tax benefit from an uncertain tax position claimed ortime we make any such determination.

If impairment indicators arise with respect to intangible assets with finite useful lives, we evaluate impairment by comparing the carrying amount of the asset to the estimated future undiscounted net cash flows expected to be claimed ongenerated by the asset. If estimated future undiscounted net cash flows are less than the carrying amount of the asset, then we estimate the fair value of the asset and compare the estimated fair value to the intangible asset’s carrying value. We recognize any shortfall from carrying value as an impairment loss in the current period.

We evaluate our investments in unconsolidated entities for impairment at least annually, and whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying value of our investment may exceed its fair value. If we determine that a tax return onlydecline in the fair value of our investment in an unconsolidated entity is other-than-temporary, and if such reduced fair value is below the carrying value, we record an impairment.

We test goodwill for impairment at least annually, and more frequently if indicators arise. We first assess qualitative factors, such as current macroeconomic conditions, state of the equity and capital markets and our overall financial and operating performance, to determine the likelihood that the fair value of a reporting unit is less than its carrying amount. If we determine it is more likely than not that the tax positionfair value of a reporting unit is less than its carrying amount, we proceed with estimating the fair value of the reporting unit. On January 1, 2020, we adopted ASU 2017-04, Simplifying the Test for Goodwill Impairment, which removes the traditional “Step 2” of the goodwill impairment test that required a hypothetical purchase price allocation. A goodwill impairment, if any, will be sustained on examination by taxing authorities, based on the technical merits of the position. The tax benefits recognized in the financial statements from suchperiod it is determined and is now measured as the amount by which a position are measuredreporting unit’s carrying value exceeds its fair value.

Estimates of fair value used in our evaluation of goodwill (if necessary based on our qualitative assessment), investments in real estate, investments in unconsolidated entities and intangible assets are based upon discounted future cash flow projections or other acceptable valuation techniques that are based, in turn, upon all available evidence including level three inputs, such as revenue and expense growth rates, estimates of future cash flows, capitalization rates, discount rates, general economic conditions and trends, or other available market data such as replacement cost or comparable transactions. Our ability to accurately predict future operating results and cash flows and to estimate and determine fair values impacts the largest benefit that has a greater than fifty percent likelihoodtiming and recognition of being realized upon ultimate settlement. We recognize interest and penalties, if applicable, related to uncertain tax positions as part of income tax benefit or expense.

Recently Issued or Adopted Accounting Standards

On January 1, 2017,impairments. While we adopted ASU 2016-09, Compensation - Stock Compensation (“ASU 2016-09”) which simplifies several aspects of the accounting for employee share-based payment transactions, including the accounting for forfeitures and statutory tax withholding requirements, as well as classificationbelieve our assumptions are reasonable, changes in the statement of cash flows. Adoption of ASU 2016-09 did notthese assumptions may have a significantmaterial impact on our Consolidated Financial Statementsfinancial results.


In 2014,Assets Held for Sale and Discontinued Operations

We sell properties from time to time for various reasons, including favorable market conditions or the FASB issued ASU 2014-09, Revenue From Contracts With Customers (“ASU 2014-09”,exercise of purchase options by tenants. We classify certain long-lived assets as codified in “ASC 606”), which outlines a comprehensive modelheld for entities to use in accounting for revenue arising from contracts with customers. ASC 606 states that “an entity recognizes revenue to depictsale once the transfer of promised goods or services to customers in an amount that reflects the consideration to which the entity expectscriteria, as defined by GAAP, have been met. Long-lived assets to be entitleddisposed of are reported at the lower of their carrying amount or fair value minus cost to sell and are no longer depreciated.

If at any time we determine that the criteria for classifying assets as held for sale are no longer met, we reclassify assets within net real estate investments on our Consolidated Balance Sheets for all periods presented. The carrying amount of these assets is adjusted (in the period in exchange for those goods or services.” While ASC 606 specifically references contracts with customers, it also appliedwhich a change in classification is determined) to other transactions suchreflect any depreciation expense that would have been recognized had the asset been continuously classified as the sale ofnet real estate investments.


estate. ASC 606 is effective for us beginning January 1, 2018 and we plan to adopt ASC 606 using the modified retrospective method.

We have evaluated all of our revenue streams to identify whether each revenue stream would be subject to the provisions of ASC 606 and any differences in the timing, measurement or presentation of revenue recognition. Based on a review of our various revenue streams, we believereport discontinued operations when the following itemscriteria are met: (1) a component of an entity or group of components that has been disposed of or classified as held for sale and represents a strategic shift that has or will have a major effect on an entity’s operations and financial results; or (2) an acquired business is classified as held for sale on the acquisition date. The results of operations for assets meeting the definition of discontinued operations are reflected in our Consolidated Statements of Income as discontinued operations for all periods presented. We allocate estimated interest expense to discontinued operations based on property values and our weighted average interest rate or the property’s actual mortgage interest.


88

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

Loans Receivable

We record loans receivable, other than those acquired in connection with a business combination, on our Consolidated Balance Sheets (either in secured loans receivable and investments, net or other assets, in the case of non-mortgage loans receivable) at the unpaid principal balance, net of any deferred origination fees, purchase discounts or premiums and valuation allowances. We amortize net deferred origination fees, which are subjectcomprised of loan fees collected from the borrower net of certain direct costs, and purchase discounts or premiums over the contractual life of the loan using the effective interest method and immediately recognize in income any unamortized balances if the loan is repaid before its contractual maturity.

On January 1, we adopted ASU 2016-13, Measurement of Credit Losses on Financial Instruments (“ASU 2016-13”). The amendments in ASU 2016-13 require us to ASC 606: office buildingevaluate a current estimate of all expected credit losses over the life of a financial instrument, which may result in earlier recognition of credit losses on loans and other services revenue, certain elementsfinancial instruments. Under prior guidance, we generally only considered past events and current conditions in measuring an incurred loss. We will establish a reserve for any estimated credit losses using this model with a corresponding charge to net income. We adopted ASU 2016-13 using the modified retrospective method and we established no reserve upon adoption. Our evaluation of credit losses of loans receivable is based on factors such as corporate and facility-level financial and operational reports, compliance with financial covenants set forth in the applicable loan agreement, the financial strength of the borrower and any guarantor, the payment history of the borrower, current economic conditions and reasonable and supportable forecasts.

Cash Equivalents

Cash equivalents consist of highly liquid investments with a maturity date of three months or less when purchased. These investments are stated at cost, which approximates fair value.

Escrow Deposits and Restricted Cash

Escrow deposits consist of amounts held by us or our resident feeslenders to provide for future real estate tax, insurance expenditures and servicestenant improvements related to our properties and gains on the sale of real estate. Our office buildingoperations. Restricted cash generally represents amounts paid to us for security deposits and other services revenuessimilar purposes.

Deferred Financing Costs

We amortize deferred financing costs, which are primarily generated by management contracts where we provide management, leasing, marketing, facility developmentreported within senior notes payable and advisory services. Resident fees and services primarily include amounts related to resident leases (subject to ASC 840, Leases) but also includes revenues generated through point-of-sale transactions that are ancillary toother debt on our Consolidated Balance Sheets, as a component of interest expense over the residents’ contractual rights to occupy living and common-area space at the communities. While these revenue streams are subject to the provisions of ASC 606, we believe that the pattern and timing of recognition of income will be consistent with the current accounting model.

As it relates to gains on sale of real estate, we will apply the provisions of ASC 610-20, Gain or Loss From Derecognition of Non-financial Assets (“ASC 610-20”), and we expect to recognize any gains when we transfer control of a property and when it is probable that we will collect substantially allterms of the related consideration.borrowings using a method that approximates a level yield. Amortized costs of approximately $23.0 million, $20.2 million and $18.1 million were included in interest expense for the years ended December 31, 2020, 2019 and 2018, respectively.

Available for Sale Securities

We will no longer apply existing sales criteria in ASC 360, Property, Plant, and Equipment. We will recognize on January 1, 2018, throughclassify available for sale securities as a cumulative effect adjustment to retained earnings, $31.2 millioncomponent of deferred gains relating to sales of real estateother assets in 2015. Other than the cumulative effect adjustment relating to such deferred gains, the adoption of ASC 606 and ASC 610-20 will not have a significant impact on our Consolidated Financial Statements. Our remaining implementation item includes finalizing revised disclosuresBalance Sheets (other than our interests in accordance with the new standard.

In February 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-02, Leases (“ASU 2016-02”),government-sponsored pooled loan investments, which introduces a lessee model that brings most leases on the balance sheetare classified as secured loans receivable and among other changes, eliminates the requirement in current GAAP for an entity to use bright-line tests in determining lease classification. The FASB also issued an Exposure Draft on January 5, 2018 proposing to amend ASU 2016-02, which would provide lessors with a practical expedient, by class of underlying assets, to not separate non-lease components from the related lease components and, instead, to account for those components as a single lease component, if certain criteria are met. ASU 2016-02 and the related Exposure Draft are not effective for us until January 1, 2019, with early adoption permitted. We are continuing to evaluate this guidance and the impact to us, as both lessor and lessee,investments, net on our Consolidated Financial Statements.Balance Sheets). We expectrecord these securities at fair value and include unrealized gains and losses recorded in stockholders’ equity as a component of accumulated other comprehensive income on our Consolidated Balance Sheets. If we determine that a credit loss exists with respect to utilizeindividual investments, we will recognize an allowance against the practical expedients proposedamortized cost basis of the investment with a corresponding charge to net income. We report interest income, including discount or premium amortization, on available for sale securities and gains or losses on securities sold, which are based on the specific identification method, in income from loans and investments in our Consolidated Statements of Income.

Derivative Instruments

We recognize all derivative instruments in other assets or accounts payable and other liabilities on our Consolidated Balance Sheets at fair value as of the reporting date. We recognize changes in the Exposure Draft as partfair value of derivative instruments in other expenses in our Consolidated Statements of Income or accumulated other comprehensive income on our Consolidated Balance Sheets, depending on the intended use of the derivative and our designation of the instrument.

We do not use our derivative financial instruments, including interest rate caps, interest rate swaps and foreign currency forward contracts, for trading or speculative purposes. Our foreign currency forward contracts and certain of our adoptioninterest rate swaps (including the interest rate swap contracts of ASU 2016-02.consolidated and unconsolidated joint ventures) are designated as effectively hedging the variability of expected cash flows related to their underlying securities and, therefore, also are

89

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
In 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-15, Classification of Certain Cash Receipts and Cash Payments (“ASU 2016-15”), which provides clarification regarding how certain cash receipts and cash payments are presented and classified
recorded on our Consolidated Balance Sheets at fair value, with changes in the statementfair value of cash flows and ASU 2016-18, Restricted Cash (“ASU 2016-18”), which requires an entity to showthese instruments recognized in accumulated other comprehensive income on our Consolidated Balance Sheets. We recognize any noncontrolling interests’ proportionate share of the changes in total cash, cash equivalents, restricted cash and restricted cash equivalentsfair value of swap contracts of our consolidated joint ventures in the statement of cash flows. ASU 2016-15 and ASU 2016-18 are effective for us beginning January 1, 2018 and will be applied by us using a retrospective transition method. Adoption of these standards is not expected to have a significant impactnoncontrolling interests on our Consolidated Financial Statements.

In 2016,Balance Sheets. We recognize our proportionate share of the FASB issued ASU 2016-16, Intra-Entity Transferschange in fair value of Assets Other Than Inventory (“ASU 2016-16”), which requires a company to recognize the tax consequencesswap contracts of an intra-entity transfer of an asset,our unconsolidated joint ventures in accumulated other than inventory, when the transfer occurs. ASU 2016-16 is effective for us beginning January 1, 2018 and will be applied by us using a modified retrospective method. Adoption of this standard is not expected to have a significant impactcomprehensive income on our Consolidated Financial Statements.Balance Sheets. Certain of our other interest rate swaps and rate caps were not designated as having a hedging relationship with the underlying securities and therefore do not meet the criteria for hedge accounting under GAAP. Accordingly, these interest rate swaps are recorded on our Consolidated Balance Sheets at fair value, and we recognize changes in the fair value of these instruments in current earnings (in other expenses) in our Consolidated Statements of Income.



Results of Operations

In August 2015, we completed the spin-off of most of our post-acute/skilled nursing facility portfolio into an independent, publicly traded REIT name Care Capital Properties, Inc. (“CCP”) (the “CCP Spin-Off”). The historical results of operations of the CCP properties are presented as discontinued operations in the accompanying results of operations. Throughout this discussion, “continuing operations” does not include properties disposed of as part of the CCP Spin-Off.

In September 2016, we completed the acquisition of substantially all of the university affiliated life science and innovation real estate assets of Wexford Science & Technology, LLC (“Wexford”) from affiliates of Blackstone Real Estate Partners VIII, L.P. (the “Life Sciences Acquisition”). As a result, we renamed our MOB operations reportable business segment “office operations,” which now includes both MOBs and life science and innovation centers.


As of December 31, 2017,2020, we operated through three reportable business segments: triple-net leased properties, senior living operations and office operations. UnderIn our triple-net leased properties segment, we invest in and own seniorssenior housing and healthcare properties throughout the United States and the United Kingdom and lease those properties to healthcare operating companies under “triple-net” or “absolute-net” leases that obligate the tenants to pay all property-related expenses. In our senior living operations segment, we invest in seniorssenior housing communities throughout the United States and Canada and engage independent operators, such as Atria and Sunrise, to manage those communities. In our office operations segment, we primarily acquire, own, develop, lease and manage MOBs and life scienceresearch and innovation centers throughout the United States. Information provided for “all other” includes income from loans and investments and other miscellaneous income and various corporate-level expenses not directly attributable to any of our three reportable business segments. Assets included in “all other” consist primarily of corporate assets, including cash, restricted cash, loans receivable and investments, and miscellaneous accounts receivable.

Our chief operating decision makers evaluate performance of the combined properties in each reportable business segment and determine how to allocate resources to those segments, in significant part, based on segment NOInet operating income (“NOI”) and related measures. For furtherIn addition to the information regarding our business segments and a discussion of our definition of segment NOI,presented below, see “NOTE 19—SEGMENT INFORMATION”“Note 19 – Segment Information” of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements included in Part II, Item 8 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.for further information regarding our business segments and a discussion of our definition of segment NOI. See “Non-GAAP Financial Measures” included elsewhere in this Annual Report for additional disclosure and reconciliations of net income attributable to common stockholders, as computed in accordance with GAAP, to NOI.

46


Years Ended December 31, 20172020 and 20162019


The table below shows our results of operations for the years ended December 31, 20172020 and 20162019 and the effect of changes in those results from period to period on our net income attributable to common stockholders.
For the Year Ended
December 31,
 (Decrease) Increase to Net Income For the Years Ended
December 31,
(Decrease) Increase to Net Income
2017 2016 $ % 20202019$%
(Dollars in thousands) (Dollars in thousands)
Segment NOI:       Segment NOI:    
Triple-net leased properties$844,711
 $850,755
 $(6,044) (0.7)%Triple-net leased properties$673,105 $754,337 $(81,232)(10.8 %)
Senior living operations593,167
 604,328
 (11,161) (1.8)Senior living operations538,489 630,135 (91,646)(14.5)
Office operations524,566
 444,276
 80,290
 18.1
Office operations549,375 574,157 (24,782)(4.3)
All other119,208
 101,214
 17,994
 17.8
All other87,021 92,610 (5,589)(6.0)
Total segment NOI2,081,652
 2,000,573
 81,079
 4.1
Total segment NOI1,847,990 2,051,239 (203,249)(9.9)
Interest and other income6,034
 876
 5,158
 nm
Interest and other income7,609 10,984 (3,375)(30.7)
Interest expense(448,196) (419,740) (28,456) (6.8)Interest expense(469,541)(451,662)(17,879)(4.0)
Depreciation and amortization(887,948) (898,924) 10,976
 1.2
Depreciation and amortization(1,109,763)(1,045,620)(64,143)(6.1)
General, administrative and professional fees(135,490) (126,875) (8,615) (6.8)General, administrative and professional fees(130,158)(158,726)28,568 18.0 
Loss on extinguishment of debt, net(754) (2,779) 2,025
 72.9
Loss on extinguishment of debt, net(10,791)(41,900)31,109 74.2 
Merger-related expenses and deal costs(10,535) (24,635) 14,100
 57.2
Merger-related expenses and deal costs(29,812)(15,235)(14,577)(95.7)
Allowance on loans receivable and investmentsAllowance on loans receivable and investments(24,238)— (24,238)nm
Other(20,052) (9,988) (10,064) nm
Other(707)10,339 (11,046)nm
Income before unconsolidated entities, income taxes, discontinued operations, real estate dispositions and noncontrolling interests584,711
 518,508
 66,203
 12.8
(Loss) income from unconsolidated entities(561) 4,358
 (4,919) nm
Income before unconsolidated entities, real estate dispositions, income taxes, discontinued operations and noncontrolling interestsIncome before unconsolidated entities, real estate dispositions, income taxes, discontinued operations and noncontrolling interests80,589 359,419 (278,830)(77.6)
Income (loss) from unconsolidated entitiesIncome (loss) from unconsolidated entities1,844 (2,454)4,298 nm
Gain on real estate dispositionsGain on real estate dispositions262,218 26,022 236,196 nm
Income tax benefit59,799
 31,343
 28,456
 nm
Income tax benefit96,534 56,310 40,224 71.4 
Income from continuing operations643,949
 554,209
 89,740
 16.2
Income from continuing operations441,185 439,297 1,888 0.4 
Discontinued operations(110) (922) 812
 nm
Discontinued operations— — — nm
Gain on real estate dispositions717,273
 98,203
 619,070
 nm
Net income1,361,112
 651,490
 709,622
 nm
Net income441,185 439,297 1,888 0.4 
Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests4,642
 2,259
 (2,383) nm
Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests2,036 6,281 4,245 67.6 
Net income attributable to common stockholders$1,356,470
 $649,231
 707,239
 nm
Net income attributable to common stockholders$439,149 $433,016 6,133 1.4 

nm—not meaningful



Segment NOI—Triple-Net Leased Properties


NOI for our triple-net leased properties reportable business segment equals the rental income and other services revenue earned from our triple-net assets. We incur no direct operating expenses for this segment.

The following table summarizes results of operations in our triple-net leased properties reportable business segment, including assets sold or classified as held for sale as of December 31, 2017,2020, but excluding assets whose operations were classified as discontinued operations:
 For the Years Ended
December 31,
(Decrease) Increase to Segment NOI
 20202019$%
 (Dollars in thousands)
Segment NOI—Triple-Net Leased Properties:    
Rental income$695,265 $780,898 $(85,633)(11.0 %)
Less: Property-level operating expenses(22,160)(26,561)4,401 16.6 
Segment NOI$673,105 $754,337 (81,232)(10.8)
nm—not meaningful
47


 
For the Year Ended
December 31,
 Decrease to Segment NOI
 2017 2016 $ %
 (Dollars in thousands)
Segment NOI—Triple-Net Leased Properties:       
Rental income$840,131
 $845,834
 $(5,703) (0.7)%
Other services revenue4,580
 4,921
 (341) (6.9)
Segment NOI$844,711
 $850,755
 (6,044) (0.7)

Triple-net leased properties segment NOI decreased in 2017 over the prior year primarily due the sale of 36 Kindred SNF properties during 2017, partially offset by rent increases due to contractual escalations pursuant to the terms of our leases and rent from eight seniors housing communities that we transitioned from senior living operations to triple-net leased properties during 2017.

In our triple-net leased properties reportable business segment, our revenues generally consist of fixed rental amounts (subject to annual contractual escalations) received from our tenants in accordance with the applicable lease terms. However, occupancyWe report revenues and property-level operating expenses within our triple-net leased properties reportable business segment for real estate tax and insurance expenses that are paid from escrows collected from our tenants.

The Triple-net leased properties segment NOI decrease in 2020 over the prior year is attributable primarily to the transition of 26 independent living assets at the start of the second quarter 2020 operated by Holiday from our triple-net portfolio to our senior housing operating portfolio, lower rental income from the Brookdale lease modification at the start of the third quarter of 2020, and the COVID-19 related write-off of previously accrued straight-line rental income during 2020 of $67.6 million (non-Holiday assets), partially offset by the $50.2 million impact of terminating the Holiday Lease. We will continue to try to collect rent on a contractual basis for the tenants where straight-line rent has been written off, but we have determined that collectability is not probable due to COVID-19.

Occupancy rates may affect the profitability of our tenants’ operations. The following table sets forth average continuing occupancy rates related to the triple-net leased properties we owned at December 31, 2017 for2020 and measured over the trailing 12 months ended September 30, 20172020 (which is the most recent information available to us from our tenants) and average continuing occupancy rates related to the triple-net leased properties we owned at December 31, 2016 for2019 and measured over the trailing 12 months ended September 30, 2016.
2019. The table excludes non-stabilized properties, properties owned through investments in unconsolidated real estate entities, certain properties for which we do not receive occupancy information and properties acquired or properties that transitioned operators for which we do not have a full four quarters of occupancy results.
 
Number of Properties at December 31, 2017 (1)
 
Average Occupancy
for the Trailing 12 Months
Ended September 30,
2017 (1)
  
Number of Properties at December 31, 2016 (1)
 
Average Occupancy
for the Trailing 12 Months
Ended September 30,
2016 (1)
Seniors housing communities418
 86.6%  431
 88.2%
SNFs17
 86.4
  53
 79.9
IRFs and LTACs36
 60.4
  38
 59.1


(1)
Excludes properties included in discontinued operations and properties classified as held for sale, non-stabilized properties, properties owned through investments in unconsolidated entities and certain properties for which we do not receive occupancy information. Also excludes properties acquired during the years ended December 31, 2017 and 2016, respectively, and properties that transitioned operators for which we do not have eight full quarters of results subsequent to the transition.

Number of Properties at December 31, 2020Average Occupancy for the Trailing 12 Months Ended September 30, 2020Number of Properties at December 31, 2019Average Occupancy for the Trailing 12 Months Ended September 30, 2019
Senior housing communities290 82.1 %326 86.0 %
Skilled nursing facilities (“SNFs”)16 82.9 16 87.3 
IRFs and LTACs35 55.7 36 53.6 

Declines in occupancy are primarily the result of COVID-19 impacts to senior housing and SNF operations.     

The following table compares results of operations for our 494359 same-store triple-net leased properties. See “Non-GAAP Financial MeasuresNOI” included elsewhere in this Annual Report on Form 10-K for additional disclosure regarding same-store NOI for each of our reportable business segments.
 For the Years Ended
December 31,
(Decrease) Increase to Segment NOI
 20202019$%
 (Dollars in thousands)
Same-Store Segment NOI—Triple-Net Leased Properties:    
Rental income$601,195 $669,510 $(68,315)(10.2 %)
Less: Property-level operating expenses(19,166)(19,198)32 0.2 
Segment NOI$582,029 $650,312 (68,283)(10.5)
nm—not meaningful

The decrease in our same-store triple-net leased properties unadjusted for foreign currency movements between comparison periods. With regardrental income in 2020 over the prior year is attributable primarily to the COVID-19 related write-off of previously accrued straight-line rental income of $67.6 million during 2020 and lower rental income from the Brookdale lease modification at the start of the third quarter of 2020, partially offset by rent increases due to contractual escalations pursuant to the terms of our triple-net leased properties segment, “same-store” refersleases. We will continue to properties owned, consolidated, operational and reported undertry to collect rent on a consistent business modelcontractual basis for the full period in both comparison periods, excluding assets sold or classified as held for sale as of December 31, 2017 and assets whose operations were classified as discontinued operations.tenants where straight-line rent has been written off, but we have determined that collectability is not probable due to COVID-19.


48


 
For the Year Ended
December 31,
 Increase to Segment NOI
 2017 2016 $ %
 (Dollars in thousands)
Same-Store Segment NOI—Triple-Net Leased Properties:       
Rental income$769,063
 $760,848
 $8,215
 1.1%
Segment NOI$769,063
 $760,848
 8,215
 1.1

Segment NOI—Senior Living Operations


The following table summarizes results of operations in our senior living operations reportable business segment, including assets sold or classified as held for sale as of December 31, 2017, but excluding assets whose operations were classified as discontinued operations:
2020.
For the Year Ended
December 31,
 Decrease to Segment NOI For the Years Ended
December 31,
Increase (Decrease) to Segment NOI
2017 2016 $ % 20202019$%
(Dollars in thousands) (Dollars in thousands)
Segment NOI—Senior Living Operations:       Segment NOI—Senior Living Operations:    
Resident fees and services$1,843,232
 $1,847,306
 $(4,074) (0.2)%Resident fees and services$2,197,160 $2,151,533 $45,627 2.1 %
Less: Property-level operating expenses(1,250,065) (1,242,978) (7,087) (0.6)Less: Property-level operating expenses(1,658,671)(1,521,398)(137,273)(9.0)
Segment NOI$593,167
 $604,328
 (11,161) (1.8)Segment NOI$538,489 $630,135 (91,646)(14.5)

 
Number of
Properties at
December 31,
 
Average Unit
Occupancy
for the Year Ended
December 31,
 
Average Monthly Revenue Per Occupied Room for
the Year Ended
December 31,
 2017 2016 2017 2016 2017 2016
Total communities293
 298
 88.3% 90.3% $5,725
 $5,474
 Number of
Properties at
December 31,
Average Unit
Occupancy
for the Years Ended
December 31,
Average Monthly Revenue Per Occupied Room for
the Years Ended
December 31,
 202020192020201920202019
Total communities432 401 81.7 %86.6 %$4,766 $5,451 
    
Resident fees and services include all amounts earned from residents at our seniorssenior housing communities, such as rental fees related to resident leases, extended health carehealthcare fees and other ancillary service income. Our senior living operations segment revenues decreased in 2017 over the prior year primarily due to the transition of eight seniors housing communities to our triple-net leased properties segment and decreased occupancy at our seniors housing communities.

Property-level operating expenses related to our senior living operations segment include labor, food, utilities, marketing, management and other costs of operating the properties. Property-level

The decrease in our senior living operations segment NOI in 2020 over the prior year is primarily attributable to lower occupancy resulting from the COVID-19 pandemic. In addition, NOI has been negatively impacted by increased operating expenses increased year over year primarily duecosts as a result of the COVID-19 pandemic, which is partially offset by the receipt of $35.1 million in grants during the fourth quarter 2020 from HHS under the Provider Relief Fund. We also had more properties in this segment because of the transition of 26 independent living assets at the start of the second quarter 2020 operated by Holiday from our triple-net portfolio to increases in salaries, benefits, insurance and otherour senior housing operating expensesportfolio and the implementationthird quarter 2019 acquisition of new care technologies.34 Canadian senior housing communities via an equity partnership with Le Groupe Maurice, which contributed to NOI.


The following table compares results of operations for our 285335 same-store senior living operating communities, unadjusted for foreign currency movements between periods. With regard tocommunities.
 For the Years Ended
December 31,
(Decrease) Increase to Segment NOI
 20202019$%
 (Dollars in thousands)
Same-Store Segment NOI—Senior Living Operations:    
Resident fees and services$1,796,135 $1,967,402 $(171,267)(8.7 %)
Less: Property-level operating expenses(1,385,316)(1,376,587)(8,729)(0.6)
Segment NOI$410,819 $590,815 (179,996)(30.5)

nm—not meaningful
 Number of
Properties at
December 31,
Average Unit
Occupancy
for the Years Ended
December 31,
Average Monthly Revenue Per Occupied Room for
the Years Ended
December 31,
 202020192020201920202019
Same-store communities335 335 79.6 %86.9 %$5,765 $5,790 

49


The decrease in our same-store senior living operations segment “same-store” refersNOI is primarily attributable to properties owned, consolidated, operational and reported underlower occupancy resulting from the COVID-19 pandemic. In addition, NOI has been negatively impacted by increased operating costs as a consistent business model for the full period in both comparison periods, excluding properties that transitioned operators since the startresult of the prior comparison period, assets sold or classified as held for sale asCOVID-19 pandemic, which is partially offset by the receipt of December 31, 2017 and assets whose operations were classified as discontinued operations.
$31.9 million in grants from HHS under the Provider Relief Fund.
 
For the Year Ended
December 31,
 Increase (Decrease) to Segment NOI
 2017 2016 $ %
 (Dollars in thousands)
Same-Store Segment NOI—Senior Living Operations:       
Resident fees and services$1,791,843
 $1,765,183
 $26,660
 1.5 %
Less: Property-level operating expenses(1,215,440) (1,187,351) (28,089) (2.4)
Segment NOI$576,403
 $577,832
 (1,429) (0.2)

 
Number of
Properties at
December 31,
 
Average Unit
Occupancy
for the Year Ended
December 31,
 
Average Monthly Revenue Per Occupied Room for
the Year Ended
December 31,
 2017 2016 2017 2016 2017 2016
Same-store communities285
 285
 88.3% 90.4% $5,745
 $5,526

Segment NOI—Office Operations


The following table summarizes results of operations in our office operations reportable business segment, including assets sold or classified as held for sale as of December 31, 2017, but excluding assets whose operations were classified as discontinued operations:
2020.
For the Year Ended
December 31,
 Increase (Decrease) to Segment NOI For the Years Ended
December 31,
(Decrease) Increase to Segment NOI
2017 2016 $ % 20202019$%
(Dollars in thousands) (Dollars in thousands)
Segment NOI—Office Operations:       Segment NOI—Office Operations:    
Rental income$753,467
 $630,342
 $123,125
 19.5 %Rental income$799,627 $828,978 $(29,351)(3.5 %)
Office building services revenue7,497
 13,029
 (5,532) (42.5)Office building services revenue8,675 7,747 928 12.0 
Total revenues760,964
 643,371
 117,593
 18.3
Total revenues808,302 836,725 (28,423)(3.4)
Less:       Less:    
Property-level operating expenses(233,007) (191,784) (41,223) (21.5)Property-level operating expenses(256,612)(260,249)3,637 1.4 
Office building services costs(3,391) (7,311) 3,920
 53.6
Office building services costs(2,315)(2,319)0.2 
Segment NOI$524,566
 $444,276
 80,290
 18.1
Segment NOI$549,375 $574,157 (24,782)(4.3)
 
Number of
Properties at
December 31,
 
Occupancy at
December 31,
 Annualized Average Rent Per Occupied Square Foot for the Year Ended December 31,
 2017 2016 2017 2016 2017 2016
Total office buildings391
 388
 92.0% 91.7% $32
 $31
 Number of
Properties at
December 31,
Occupancy at
December 31,
Annualized Average Rent Per Occupied Square Foot for the Years Ended December 31,
 202020192020201920202019
Total office buildings374 382 89.7 %90.3 %$34 $34 
    
The increasedecrease in our office operations segment rental incomeNOI in 20172020 over the prior year is attributed primarilyattributable to assets sold to the office buildings we acquiredVentas Fund in the first quarter of 2020, lease termination fees received in 2019, and COVID-19 impacts including the write-off of previously accrued straight-line rental income during 20172020 and 2016,reduced parking revenues. These reduction in NOI were partially offset by dispositions. The increase in our office building property-level operating expenses is due primarily to those acquired office buildingsactive leasing at recently developed and increases in real estate taxesredeveloped properties, improved tenant retention, contractual rent escalators, acquisitions and other operating expenses, partially offset by dispositions.business interruption insurance proceeds.

Office building services revenue and costs both decreased in 2017 over the prior year primarily due to decreased construction activity during 2017 compared to 2016.     


The following table compares results of operations for our 350355 same-store office buildings. With regard to
 For the Years Ended
December 31,
Increase (Decrease) to Segment NOI
 20202019$%
 (Dollars in thousands)
Same-Store Segment NOI—Office Operations:    
Rental income$743,563 $733,482 $10,081 1.4 %
Less: Property-level operating expenses(235,789)(231,946)(3,843)(1.7)
Segment NOI$507,774 $501,536 6,238 1.2 
 Number of
Properties at
December 31,
Occupancy at
December 31,
Annualized Average Rent Per Occupied Square Foot for the Years Ended December 31,
 202020192020201920202019
Same-store office buildings355 355 91.3 %92.2 %$34 $33 
The increase in our same-store office operations segment “same-store” refers to properties owned, consolidated, operational and reported under a consistent business model for the full periodNOI in both comparison periods, excluding assets sold or classified as held for sale as of December 31, 2017 and assets whose operations were classified as discontinued operations.
 
For the Year Ended
December 31,
 Increase (Decrease) to Segment NOI
 2017 2016 $ %
 (Dollars in thousands)
Same-Store Segment NOI—Office Operations:       
Rental income$558,575
 $552,045
 $6,530
 1.2 %
Less: Property-level operating expenses(169,583) (164,987) (4,596) (2.8)
Segment NOI$388,992
 $387,058
 1,934
 0.5

 
Number of
Properties at
December 31,
 
Occupancy at
December 31,
 Annualized Average Rent Per Occupied Square Foot for the Year Ended December 31,
 2017 2016 2017 2016 2017 2016
Same-store office buildings350
 350
 91.3% 92.0% $31
 $30
Segment NOI - All Other

All other increased in 20172020 over the prior year dueis attributable primarily to successful leasing, enhanced tenant retention, continued strong collections through the COVID-19 pandemic and contractual rent escalations.
50



All Other

Information provided for all other segment NOI includes income from new loans issued during 2017, partially offset by decreased interestand investments and other miscellaneous income not directly attributable to loan repayments received during 2016 and 2017.

Interest andany of our three reportable business segments. The $5.6 million decrease in all other income

Interest and other income increased $5.2 millionsegment NOI in 20172020 over the prior year asis primarily due to reduced interest income from our loans receivable investments from lower LIBOR-based interest rates, repayments of loans outstanding net of new issuances, partially offset by increased management fee revenues from investments in unconsolidated real estate entities. See “Note 6 – Loans Receivable and Investments” of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements included in Part II, Item 8 of this Annual Report.

Interest and Other Income

The $3.4 million decrease in interest and other income in 2020 over the prior year is primarily due to 2019 income from the exercise of warrants related to our research and innovation properties, partially offset by a result2020 reduction of fees received from a tenant in 2017 which were not associated with a lease agreement.liability related to an acquisition and interest income on short-term investments.


Interest Expense


The $28.5$17.9 million increase in total interest expense in 2020 over the prior year is attributed primarily attributable to a $17.1an increase of $53.0 million increase in interest due to higher debt balances, and an $11.3partially offset by a decrease of $35.5 million increase due to highera lower effective interest rates, including the amortization of any fair value adjustments.rate. Our weighted average effective interest rate was 3.7%3.5% for 2017,2020, compared to 3.6%3.8% for 2016.2019. Capitalized interest for 2020 and 2019 was $9.6 million and $9.0 million, respectively.


Depreciation and Amortization


Depreciation and amortization expense related to continuing operations decreasedincreased during 20172020 compared to 2016,2019, primarily due to a decreasean increase in amortization related to certain lease intangibles that were fully amortizedreal estate impairments during 2020 and asset acquisitions, including the third quarter2019 acquisition of 2016,senior housing communities operated by LGM. This is partially offset by the impact of dispositions during 2020. See “Note 1 – Description of Business - COVID-19 Update” for information regarding 2020 real estate impairment charges.

General, Administrative and Professional Fees

The $28.6 million decrease in general, administrative and professional fees in 2020 over the prior year is primarily a full yearresult of depreciationthe capital conservation actions taken during 2020, including the June 2020 elimination of approximately 25% of corporate positions and amortization related toa reduction in executives’ salaries for the September 2016 Life Sciences Acquisition.second half of 2020. See “2020 Capital Conservation Actions” for information regarding these measures.


Loss on Extinguishment of Debt, Net


The loss on extinguishment of debt, net in 2017 resulted2020 is due primarily fromto the repaymentnotice of term loans and the replacementredemption of $236.3 million of our previous $2.0 billion unsecured revolving credit facility.3.25% senior notes due 2022. The loss on extinguishment of debt, net in 20162019 was due primarily to ourthe redemption and repayment of $550.0$600.0 million aggregate principal amountamounts then outstanding of our 1.55%4.25% senior notes due 20162022. See “—Liquidity and term loan repayments in 2016.Capital Resources”.


Merger-Related Expenses and Deal Costs


Merger-related expenses and deal costs consist of transition, integration, deal and severance-related expenses primarily related to pending and consummated transactions required by GAAP to be expensed rather than capitalized into the asset value. The $14.1$14.6 million decreaseincrease in merger-related expenses and deal costs in 20172020 over the prior year is due primarily to costs incurred as a result of the Brookdale transaction and 2020 expenses related to severance and operator transitions.

Allowance on Loans Receivable and Investments

The allowance on loans receivable and investments in 2020 is due to credit losses on certain of our non-mortgage loans receivable and government-sponsored pooled loan investments, less recoveries received during the September 2016 Life Sciences Acquisition.year. See “Note 1 – Description of Business - COVID-19 Update” for more information regarding these allowances.


51


Other


The $10.1$11.0 million increasechange in other for 2017 over 2016from income in 2019 to an expense in 2020 is primarily due to charges related to natural disasters. We have insurance coverage to mitigaterecoveries received in 2019 and increased corporate-level insurance costs in 2020, partially offset by the financial impactchange in fair value of these types of events. However, there can be no assurance regardingstock warrants received in connection with the amount or timing of any insurance recoveries. Such recoveries will be recognized when collection is deemed probable.Brookdale transaction.


Income (Loss) from Unconsolidated Entities


The $4.9$4.3 million decreaseincrease in income (loss) from unconsolidated entities for 20172020 over 20162019 is primarily due to our share of net losses related to certainfinancial results from our unconsolidated entities in 2017 partially2020, offset by the February 2017 fair value re-measurementan impairment of our previously held equity interest, resultinginvestment in a gain on re-measurementan unconsolidated operating entity in 2020. See “Note 1 – Description of $3.0 million. Refer to “NOTE 7—INVESTMENTS IN UNCONSOLIDATED ENTITIES” of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements included in Part II, Item 8 of this Annual Report on Form 10-KBusiness - COVID-19 Update” for additional information.information regarding 2020 impairment charges.


Income Tax Benefit

The 2017 income tax benefit is primarily due to accounting for the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2017 (the “2017 Tax Act”), specifically a $64.5 million benefit from the reduced U.S. federal corporate tax rate on net deferred tax liabilities and an offsetting expense of $23.3 million to establish a valuation allowance on deferred interest carryforwards, losses of certain TRS entities and the release of a tax reserve. The 2016 income tax benefit was due primarily to losses of certain TRS entities, the reversal of a net deferred tax liability at one TRS and the release of a tax reserve. The TRS losses were mainly attributable to the depreciation and amortization of fixed and intangible assets recorded as deferred tax liabilities in purchase accounting.


Gain on Real Estate Dispositions


The $236.2 million increase of $619.1 million in gain on real estate dispositions for 20172020 over 20162019 is due primarily to our contribution of six properties to the sale of 36 Kindred SNFsVentas Fund in 2017.2020.


Net Income Attributable to Noncontrolling InterestsTax Benefit


The $40.2 million increase in net income attributabletax benefit related to noncontrolling interests of $2.4 millioncontinuing operations for 20172020 over 20162019 is primarily due to a $152.9 million deferred tax benefit related to the September 2016 Life Sciences Acquisition. internal restructuring of certain U.S. taxable REIT subsidiaries completed within the first quarter of 2020, partially offset by changes in the valuation allowance against deferred tax assets of certain of our TRS entities. The restructuring benefit resulted from the transfer of assets subject to certain deferred tax liabilities from taxable REIT subsidiaries to the entities other than the TRS entities in this tax-free transaction.
Years Ended December 31, 20162019 and 20152018


The table below showsOur Annual Report for the year ended December 31, 2019, filed with the SEC on February 24, 2020, contains information regarding our results of operations for the years ended December 31, 20162019 and 20152018 and the effect of changes in those results from period to period on our net income attributable to common stockholders.

 
For the Year Ended
December 31,
 Increase (Decrease) to Net Income
 2016 2015 $ %
 (Dollars in thousands)
Segment NOI:       
Triple-net leased properties$850,755
 $784,234
 $66,521
 8.5 %
Senior living operations604,328
 601,840
 2,488
 0.4
Office operations444,276
 399,891
 44,385
 11.1
All other101,214
 89,176
 12,038
 13.5
Total segment NOI2,000,573
 1,875,141
 125,432
 6.7
Interest and other income876
 1,052
 (176) (16.7)
Interest expense(419,740) (367,114) (52,626) (14.3)
Depreciation and amortization(898,924) (894,057) (4,867) (0.5)
General, administrative and professional fees(126,875) (128,035) 1,160
 0.9
Loss on extinguishment of debt, net(2,779) (14,411) 11,632
 80.7
Merger-related expenses and deal costs(24,635) (102,944) 78,309
 76.1
Other(9,988) (17,957) 7,969
 44.4
Income before unconsolidated entities, income taxes, discontinued operations, real estate dispositions and noncontrolling interest518,508
 351,675
 166,833
 47.4
Income (loss) from unconsolidated entities4,358
 (1,420) 5,778
 nm
Income tax benefit31,343
 39,284
 (7,941) (20.2)
Income from continuing operations554,209
 389,539
 164,670
 42.3
Discontinued operations(922) 11,103
 (12,025) nm
Gain on real estate dispositions98,203
 18,580
 79,623
 nm
Net income651,490
 419,222
 232,268
 55.4
Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests2,259
 1,379
 (880) (63.8)
Net income attributable to common stockholders$649,231
 $417,843
 231,388
 55.4

nm—not meaningful 

Segment NOI—Triple-Net Leased Properties

The following table summarizes results of operations in our triple-net leased properties reportable business segment, including assets sold or classified as held for sale as of December 31, 2016, but excluding assets whose operations were classified as discontinued operations:
 
For the Year Ended
December 31,
 Increase to Segment NOI
 2016 2015 $ %
 (Dollars in thousands)
Segment NOI—Triple-Net Leased Properties:       
Rental income$845,834
 $779,801
 $66,033
 8.5%
Other services revenue4,921
 4,433
 488
 11.0
Segment NOI$850,755
 $784,234
 66,521
 8.5
Triple-net leased properties segment NOI increased in 2016 over the prior year primarily due to rent from the properties we acquired and developed during 2016 and 2015, contractual escalations in rent pursuant to the terms of our leases, and increases in base and other rent under certain of our leases, partially offset by 2015 lease termination fees.

The following table compares results of operations for our 511 same-store triple-net leased properties, unadjusted for foreign currency movements between comparison periods. With regard to our triple-net leased properties segment, “same-store” refers to properties owned, consolidated, operational and reported under a consistent business model for the full period in both comparison periods, excluding assets sold or classified as held for sale as of December 31, 2016 and assets whose operations were classified as discontinued operations.
 
For the Year Ended
December 31,
 Increase to Segment NOI
 2016 2015 $ %
 (Dollars in thousands)
Same-Store Segment NOI—Triple-Net Leased Properties:       
Rental income$695,124
 $673,706
 $21,418
 3.2%
Segment NOI$695,124
 $673,706
 21,418
 3.2

Segment NOI—Senior Living Operations

The following table summarizes results of operations in our senior living operations reportable business segment, including assets sold or classified as held for sale as of December 31, 2016, but excluding assets whose operations were classified as discontinued operations:
 
For the Year Ended
December 31,
 Increase (Decrease) to Segment NOI
 2016 2015 $ %
 (Dollars in thousands)
Segment NOI—Senior Living Operations:       
Resident fees and services$1,847,306
 $1,811,255
 $36,051
 2.0 %
Less: Property-level operating expenses(1,242,978) (1,209,415) (33,563) (2.8)
Segment NOI$604,328
 $601,840
 2,488
 0.4
 
Number of
Properties at
December 31,
 
Average Unit
Occupancy for
the Year
Ended
December 31,
 
Average
Monthly Revenue Per Occupied Room for
the Year
Ended
December 31,
 2016 2015 2016 2015 2016 2015
Total communities298
 305
 90.3% 91.2% $5,474
 $5,255

Resident fees and services increased in 2016 over the prior year primarily due to seniors housing communities we acquired during 2015 and an increase in average monthly revenue per occupied room, partially offset by decreased occupancy at our seniors housing communities.

Property-level operating expenses also increased year over year primarily due to the acquired properties described above and increases in salaries, bonus, benefits, insurance, real estate tax expenses and other operating expenses.

The following table compares results of operations for our 262 same-store senior living operating communities, unadjusted for foreign currency movements between periods. With regard to our senior living operations segment, “same-store” refers to properties that we owned and were operational for the full period in both comparison periods, excluding properties that transitioned operators since the start of the prior comparison period, assets sold or classified as held for sale as of December 31, 2016 and assets whose operations were classified as discontinued operations.
 
For the Year Ended
December 31,
 Increase (Decrease) to Segment NOI
 2016 2015 $ %
 (Dollars in thousands)
Same-Store Segment NOI—Senior Living Operations:       
Total revenues$1,667,279
 $1,617,757
 $49,522
 3.1 %
Less: Property-level operating expenses(1,116,109) (1,077,510) (38,599) (3.6)
Segment NOI$551,170
 $540,247
 10,923
 2.0
 
Number of
Properties at
December 31,
 
Average Unit
Occupancy for
the Year
Ended
December 31,
 
Average
Monthly Revenue Per Occupied Room for
the Year
Ended
December 31,
 2016 2015 2016 2015 2016 2015
Same-store communities262
 262
 90.4% 91.1% $5,578
 $5,379

Segment NOI—Office Operations

The following table summarizes results of operations in our office operations reportable business segment, including assets sold or classified as held for sale as of December 31, 2016, but excluding assets whose operations were classified as discontinued operations:
 
For the Year Ended
December 31,
 Increase (Decrease) to Segment NOI
 2016 2015 $ %
 (Dollars in thousands)
Segment NOI—Office Operations:       
Rental income$630,342
 $566,245
 $64,097
 11.3 %
Office building services revenue13,029
 34,436
 (21,407) (62.2)
Total revenues643,371
 600,681
 42,690
 7.1
Less:       
Property-level operating expenses(191,784) (174,225) (17,559) (10.1)
Office building services costs(7,311) (26,565) 19,254
 72.5
Segment NOI$444,276
 $399,891
 44,385
 11.1
 
Number of
Properties at
December 31,
 
Occupancy at
December 31,
 Annualized Average Rent Per Occupied Square Foot for the Year Ended December 31,
 2016 2015 2016 2015 2016 2015
Total office buildings388
 369
 91.7% 91.7% $31
 $29


The increase in our office operations segment rental income in 2016 over the prior year is attributed primarily to the MOBs we acquired during 2016 and 2015 and the Life Sciences Acquisition, as well as in-place lease escalations. The increase in our office building property-level operating expenses is due primarily to those acquired MOBs and life science and innovation centers and increases in real estate taxes and other operating expenses.

Office building services revenue and costs both decreased in 2016 over the prior year primarily due to decreased construction activity during 2016 compared to 2015.

The following table compares results of operations for our 272 same-store office buildings. With regard to our office operations segment, “same-store” refers to properties owned, consolidated, operational and reported under a consistent business model for the full period in both comparison periods, excluding assets sold or classified as held for sale as of December 31, 2016 and assets whose operations were classified as discontinued operations.
 
For the Year Ended
December 31,
 
(Decrease) Increase
to Segment NOI
 2016 2015 $ %
 (Dollars in thousands)
Same-Store Segment NOI—Office Operations:       
Rental income$432,657
 $434,022
 $(1,365) (0.3)%
Less: Property-level operating expenses(142,826) (144,218) 1,392
 1.0
Segment NOI$289,831
 $289,804
 27
 0.0
 
Number of
Properties at
December 31,
 
Occupancy at
December 31,
 Annualized Average Rent Per Occupied Square Foot for the Year Ended December 31,
 2016 2015 2016 2015 2016 2015
Same-store office buildings272
 272
 90.6% 91.2% $31
 $31
Segment NOI - All Other

All other increased in 2016 over the prior year due primarily to a February 2016 $140.0 million secured mezzanine loan investment that has an annual interest rate of 9.95%, partially offset by decreased interest income due to loans repaid during 2016.

Interest Expense

The $7.8 million decrease in total interest expense, including interest allocated to discontinued operations of $60.4 million for the year ended December 31, 2015, is attributed primarily to an $11.5 million reduction in interest due to lower debt balances, partially offset by a $3.7 million increase due to higher effective interest rates, including the amortization of any fair value adjustments. Our effective interest rate was 3.63% for 2016, compared to 3.60% for 2015.

Loss on Extinguishment of Debt, Net

The loss on extinguishment of debt, net in 2016 and 2015 resulted primarily from various debt repayments we made to improve our credit profile. The 2016 activity related to the redemption and repayment of the $550.0 million aggregate principal amount then outstanding of our 1.55% senior notes due 2016 and term loan repayments. The 2015 repayments were made primarily with proceeds from the distribution paid to us at the time of the CCP Spin-Off.

Merger-Related Expenses and Deal Costs

The $78.3 million decrease in merger-related expenses and deal costs in 2016 over the prior year is primarily due to the January 2015 acquisition of American Realty Capital Healthcare Trust, Inc. and the August 2015 acquisition of Ardent Health Services, Inc., partially offset by costs incurred relating to the September 2016 Life Sciences Acquisition.

Income Tax Benefit

Income tax benefit for 2016 was due primarily to losses of certain TRS entities, the reversal of a net deferred tax liability at one TRS and the release of a tax reserve. Income tax benefit for 2015 was due primarily to the income tax benefit of ordinary losses of certain TRS entities. The TRS losses were mainly attributable to the depreciation and amortization of fixed and intangible assets recorded as deferred tax liabilities in purchase accounting.

Discontinued Operations

Discontinued operations for 2016 reflects $0.9 million of separation costs relating to the CCP Spin-Off. Discontinued operations for 2015 are primarily the result of $46.4 million of transaction and separation costs associated with the CCP Spin-Off and net income for the CCP operations from January 1, 2015 through August 17, 2015, the date of the CCP Spin-Off.

Gain on Real Estate Dispositions

The $79.6 million increase in gain on real estate dispositions in 2016 over the same period in 2015 primarily relates to the 2016 sale of one triple-net leased property.

Non-GAAP Financial Measures


We consider certain non-GAAP financial measures to be useful supplemental measures of our operating performance. A non-GAAP financial measure is a measure of historical or future financial performance, financial position or cash flows that excludes or includes amounts that are not so excluded from or included in the most directly comparable measure calculated and presented in accordance with GAAP. Described below are the non-GAAP financial measures used by management to evaluate our operating performance and that we consider most useful to investors, together with reconciliations of these measures to the most directly comparable GAAP measures.


The non-GAAP financial measures we present in this Annual Report on Form 10-K may not be comparable to those presented by other real estate companies due to the fact that not all real estate companies use the same definitions. You should not consider these measures as alternatives to net income or income from continuing operations (both determinedattributable to common stockholders (determined in accordance with GAAP) as indicators of our financial performance or as alternatives to cash flow from operating activities (determined in accordance with GAAP) as measures of our liquidity, nor are these measures necessarily indicative of sufficient cash flow to fund all of our needs. In order to facilitate a clear understanding of our consolidated historical operating results, you should examine these measures in conjunction with net income and income from continuing operationsattributable to common stockholders as presented in our Consolidated Financial Statements and other financial data included elsewhere in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.Report.

52



Funds From Operations and Normalized Funds From Operations Attributable to Common Stockholders


Historical cost accounting for real estate assets implicitly assumes that the value of real estate assets diminishes predictably over time. However, since real estate values historically have risen or fallen with market conditions, many industry investors deem presentations of operating results for real estate companies that use historical cost accounting to be insufficient by themselves. For that reason, we consider Funds From Operations attributable to common stockholders (“FFO”) and normalized FFO to be appropriate supplemental measures of operating performance of an equity REIT. In particular, we believe that normalized FFO is useful because it allows investors, analysts and our management to compare our operating performance to the operating performance of other real estate companies and between periods on a consistent basis without having to account for differences caused by non-recurring items and other non-operational events such as transactions and litigation. In some cases, we provide information about identified non-cash components of FFO and normalized FFO because it allows investors, analysts and our management to assess the impact of those items on our financial results.


We use the National Association of Real Estate Investment Trusts (“NAREIT”Nareit”) definition of FFO. NAREITNareit defines FFO as net income attributable to common stockholders (computed in accordance with GAAP), excluding gains or losses from sales of real estate property, including gains or losses on re-measurementremeasurement of equity method investments, and impairment write-downs of depreciable real estate, plus real estate depreciation and amortization, and after adjustments for unconsolidated partnerships and joint ventures.entities. Adjustments for unconsolidated partnerships and joint venturesentities will be calculated to reflect FFO on the same basis. We define normalized FFO as FFO excluding the following income and expense items (which may be recurring in nature): (a) merger-related costs and expenses, including amortization of intangibles, transition and integration expenses, and deal costs and expenses, including expenses and recoveries relating to acquisition lawsuits; (b) the impact of any expenses related to asset impairment and valuation allowances, the write-off of unamortized deferred financing fees, or

additional costs, expenses, discounts, make-whole payments, penalties or premiums incurred as a result of early retirement or payment of our debt; (c) the non-cash effect of income tax benefits or expenses, the non-cash impact of changes to our executive equity compensation plan, and derivative transactions that have non-cash mark-to-marketmark to market impacts on our Consolidated Statements of Income;Income and non-cash charges related to leases; (d) the financial impact of contingent consideration, severance-related costs and charitable donations made to the Ventas Charitable Foundation; (e) gains and losses for non-operational foreign currency hedge agreements and changes in the fair value of financial instruments; (f) gains and losses on non-real estate dispositions and other unusual items related to unconsolidated entities; (g) expenses related to the re-auditreaudit and re-review in 2014 of our historical financial statements and related matters; and (h) net expenses or recoveries related to natural disasters. We believe that income from continuing operations isdisasters; and (i) any other incremental items set forth in the most comparable GAAP measure because it provides insight into our continuing operations.normalized FFO reconciliation included herein.    



The following table summarizes our FFO and normalized FFO for each of the five years ended December 31, 2017. Our2020. The decrease in normalized FFO for the year ended December 31, 2017 increased2020 over the prior year is due primarily to improved property performancethe impact of COVID-19 on our senior housing business and accretive investments.increases in interest expense from incremental borrowings arising as a consequence of the impact of COVID-19, partially offset by the positive impact of our third quarter 2019 acquisition of an interest in 34 Canadian senior housing communities via an equity partnership with Le Groupe Maurice.
53


For the Years Ended December 31,
For the Years Ended December 31, 20202019201820172016
2017 2016 2015 2014 2013 (In thousands)
(In thousands)
Income from continuing operations$643,949
 $554,209
 $389,539
 $359,296
 $375,498
Discontinued operations(110) (922) 11,103
 99,735
 79,171
Gain on real estate dispositions717,273
 98,203
 18,580
 17,970
 
Net income1,361,112
 651,490
 419,222
 477,001
 454,669
Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests4,642
 2,259
 1,379
 1,234
 1,160
Net income attributable to common stockholders1,356,470
 649,231
 417,843
 475,767
 453,509
Net income attributable to common stockholders$439,149 $433,016 $409,467 $1,356,470 $649,231 
Adjustments:         Adjustments:     
Real estate depreciation and amortization881,088
 891,985
 887,126
 718,649
 624,245
Real estate depreciation and amortization1,104,114 1,039,550 913,537 881,088 891,985 
Real estate depreciation related to noncontrolling interests(7,565) (7,785) (7,906) (10,314) (10,512)Real estate depreciation related to noncontrolling interests(16,767)(9,762)(6,926)(7,565)(7,785)
Real estate depreciation related to unconsolidated entities4,231
 5,754
 7,353
 5,792
 6,543
Real estate depreciation related to unconsolidated entities4,986 187 1,977 4,231 5,754 
(Gain) loss on real estate dispositions related to unconsolidated entities(1,057) (439) 19
 
 
(Gain) loss on re-measurement of equity interest upon acquisition, net(3,027) 
 176
 
 (1,241)
Gain on real estate dispositions related to noncontrolling interests18
 
 
 
 
Gain on real estate dispositions related to unconsolidated entitiesGain on real estate dispositions related to unconsolidated entities— (1,263)(875)(1,057)(439)
Gain on re-measurement of equity interest upon acquisition, netGain on re-measurement of equity interest upon acquisition, net— — — (3,027)— 
Impairment on equity method investmentImpairment on equity method investment— — 35,708 — — 
(Loss) gain on real estate dispositions related to noncontrolling interests(Loss) gain on real estate dispositions related to noncontrolling interests(9)343 1,508 18 — 
Gain on real estate dispositions(717,273) (98,203) (18,580) (17,970) 
Gain on real estate dispositions(262,218)(26,022)(46,247)(717,273)(98,203)
Discontinued operations:         Discontinued operations:   
Loss (gain) on real estate dispositions
 1
 (231) (1,494) (4,059)
Depreciation on real estate assets
 
 79,608
 103,250
 139,973
Loss on real estate dispositionsLoss on real estate dispositions— — — — 
FFO attributable to common stockholders1,512,885
 1,440,544
 1,365,408
 1,273,680
 1,208,458
FFO attributable to common stockholders1,269,255 1,436,049 1,308,149 1,512,885 1,440,544 
Adjustments:         Adjustments:     
Change in fair value of financial instruments(41) 62
 460
 5,121
 449
Change in fair value of financial instruments(21,928)(78)(18)(41)62 
Non-cash income tax benefit(22,387) (34,227) (42,384) (9,431) (11,828)Non-cash income tax benefit(98,114)(58,918)(18,427)(22,387)(34,227)
Effect of the 2017 Tax Act(36,539) 
 
 
 
Effect of the 2017 Tax Act— — (24,618)(36,539)— 
Loss on extinguishment of debt, net839
 2,779
 15,797
 5,013
 1,048
Loss on extinguishment of debt, net10,791 41,900 63,073 839 2,779 
Gain on non-real estate dispositions related to unconsolidated entities(39) (557) 
 
 
Gain on non-real estate dispositions related to unconsolidated entities(597)(18)(2)(39)(557)
Merger-related expenses, deal costs and re-audit costs14,823
 28,290
 152,344
 54,389
 21,560
Merger-related expenses, deal costs and re-audit costs34,690 18,208 38,145 14,823 28,290 
Amortization of other intangibles1,458
 1,752
 2,058
 1,246
 1,022
Amortization of other intangibles472 484 759 1,458 1,752 
Other items related to unconsolidated entities3,188
 
 
 
 
Other items related to unconsolidated entities(614)3,291 5,035 3,188 — 
Non-cash impact of changes to equity plan5,453
 
 
 
 
Non-cash impact of changes to equity plan(452)7,812 4,830 5,453 — 
Non-cash charges related to lease terminationsNon-cash charges related to lease terminations— — 21,299 — — 
Natural disaster expenses (recoveries), net11,601
 
 
 
 
Natural disaster expenses (recoveries), net1,247 (25,683)63,830 11,601 — 
Impact of Holiday lease terminationImpact of Holiday lease termination(50,184)— — — — 
Write-off of straight-line rental income, net of noncontrolling interestsWrite-off of straight-line rental income, net of noncontrolling interests70,863 — — — — 
Allowance on loan investments and impairment of unconsolidated entities, net of noncontrolling interestsAllowance on loan investments and impairment of unconsolidated entities, net of noncontrolling interests34,543 — — — — 
Normalized FFO attributable to common stockholders$1,491,241
 $1,438,643
 $1,493,683
 $1,330,018
 $1,220,709
Normalized FFO attributable to common stockholders$1,249,972 $1,423,047 $1,462,055 $1,491,241 $1,438,643 

54



Adjusted EBITDA


We consider Adjusted EBITDA an important supplemental measure because it provides another manner in which to evaluate our operating performance and serves as another indicator of our credit strength and our ability to service our debt obligations. We define Adjusted EBITDA as consolidated earnings which includes amounts in discontinued operations, before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization (including non-cash stock-based compensation expense)expense, asset impairment and valuation allowances), excluding gains or losses on extinguishment of debt, our consolidated joint venture partners’ share of EBITDA of consolidated entities, merger-related expenses and deal costs, expenses related to the re-auditreaudit and re-review in 2014 of our historical financial statements, net gains or losses on real estate activity, gains or losses on re-measurementremeasurement of equity interest upon acquisition, changes in the fair value of financial instruments, unrealized foreign currency gains or losses, and net expenses or recoveries related to natural disasters and non-cash charges related to leases, and including ourVentas’ share of EBITDA from unconsolidated entities and adjustments for other immaterial or identified items. The following table sets forth a reconciliation of net income from continuing operationsattributable to common stockholders to Adjusted EBITDA for the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016 and 2015:
 For the Years Ended December 31,
 2017 2016 2015
 (In thousands)
Income from continuing operations$643,949
 $554,209
 $389,539
Discontinued operations(110) (922) 11,103
Gain on real estate dispositions717,273
 98,203
 18,580
Net income1,361,112
 651,490
 419,222
Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests4,642
 2,259
 1,379
Net income attributable to common stockholders1,356,470
 649,231
 417,843
Adjustments:     
Interest448,196
 419,740
 427,542
Loss on extinguishment of debt, net754
 2,779
 14,411
Taxes (including amounts in general, administrative and professional fees)(57,307) (29,129) (37,112)
Depreciation and amortization887,948
 898,924
 973,665
Non-cash stock-based compensation expense26,543
 20,958
 19,537
Merger-related expenses, deal costs and re-audit costs12,653
 25,141
 150,290
Net income (loss) attributable to noncontrolling interests, net of consolidated joint venture partners’ share of EBITDA(12,975) (12,654) (12,722)
(Income) loss from unconsolidated entities, net of Ventas share of EBITDA from unconsolidated entities32,219
 25,246
 18,806
Gain on real estate dispositions(717,273) (98,202) (18,811)
Unrealized foreign currency gains(612) (1,440) (1,727)
Changes in fair value of financial instruments(61) 51
 460
(Gain) loss on re-measurement of equity interest upon acquisition, net(3,027) 
 176
Natural disaster expenses (recoveries), net11,601
 
 
Adjusted EBITDA$1,985,129
 $1,900,645
 $1,952,358
EBITDA:

 For the Years Ended December 31,
 202020192018
 (In thousands)
Net income attributable to common stockholders$439,149 $433,016 $409,467 
Adjustments:   
Interest469,541 451,662 442,497 
Loss on extinguishment of debt, net10,791 41,900 58,254 
Taxes (including amounts in general, administrative and professional fees)(91,389)(52,677)(37,230)
Depreciation and amortization1,109,763 1,045,620 919,639 
Non-cash stock-based compensation expense21,487 33,923 29,963 
Merger-related expenses, deal costs and re-audit costs29,811 15,246 33,608 
Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests, adjusted for partners’ share of consolidated entity EBITDA(24,381)(16,396)(10,420)
Loss from unconsolidated entities, adjusted for Ventas share of EBITDA from unconsolidated entities59,631 32,462 86,278 
Gain on real estate dispositions(262,218)(26,022)(46,247)
Unrealized foreign currency (gains) losses(439)(1,061)138 
Changes in fair value of financial instruments(21,928)(104)(54)
Non-cash charges related to lease terminations— — 21,299 
Natural disaster expenses (recoveries), net1,203 (25,981)54,684 
Write-off of straight-line rental income from Holiday lease termination49,611 — — 
Write-off of straight-line rental income, net of noncontrolling interests70,863 — — 
Allowance on loan investments and impairment of unconsolidated entities, net of noncontrolling interests23,879 — — — 
Adjusted EBITDA$1,885,374 $1,931,588 $1,961,876 

NOI


We also consider NOI an important supplemental measure because it allows investors, analysts and our management to assess our unlevered property-level operating results and to compare our operating results with those of other real estate companies and between periods on a consistent basis. We define NOI as total revenues, less interest and other income,
55


property-level operating expenses and office building services costs. Cash receipts may differ due to straight-line recognition of certain rental income and the application of other GAAP policies.

The following table sets forth a reconciliation of net income attributable to common stockholders to NOI:

 For the Years Ended December 31,
 202020192018
 (In thousands)
Net income attributable to common stockholders$439,149 $433,016 $409,467 
Adjustments:   
Interest and other income(7,609)(10,984)(24,892)
Interest expense469,541 451,662 442,497 
Depreciation and amortization1,109,763 1,045,620 919,639 
General, administrative and professional fees130,158 158,726 145,978 
Loss on extinguishment of debt, net10,791 41,900 58,254 
Merger-related expenses and deal costs29,812 15,235 30,547 
Allowance on loan receivable and investments24,238 — — 
Discontinued operations— — 10 
Other707 (10,339)72,772 
Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests2,036 6,281 6,514 
(Income) loss from unconsolidated entities(1,844)2,454 55,034 
Income tax benefit(96,534)(56,310)(39,953)
Gain on real estate dispositions(262,218)(26,022)(46,247)
NOI$1,847,990 $2,051,239 $2,029,620 
from continuing operations to
See “Results of Operations” for discussions regarding both segment NOI and same-store segment NOI. We define same-store as properties owned, consolidated and operational for the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016full period in both comparison periods and 2015:are not otherwise excluded; provided, however, that we may include selected properties that otherwise meet the same-store criteria if they are included in substantially all of, but not a full, period for one or both of the comparison periods, and in our judgment such inclusion provides a more meaningful presentation of our portfolio performance.

Newly acquired or recently developed or redeveloped properties in our senior living operations segment will be included in same-store once they are stabilized for the full period in both periods presented. These properties are considered stabilized upon the earlier of (a) the achievement of 80% sustained occupancy or (b) 24 months from the date of acquisition or substantial completion of work. Recently developed or redeveloped properties in our office operations and triple-net leased properties segments will be included in same-store once substantial completion of work has occurred for the full period in both periods presented. Our senior living operations and triple-net leased properties that have undergone operator or business model transitions will be included in same-store once operating under consistent operating structures for the full period in both periods presented.

Properties are excluded from same-store if they are: (i) sold, classified as held for sale or properties whose operations were classified as discontinued operations in accordance with GAAP; (ii) impacted by materially disruptive events such as flood or fire; (iii) those properties that are currently undergoing a materially disruptive redevelopment; (iv) for our office operations, those properties for which management has an intention to institute a redevelopment plan because the properties may require major property-level expenditures to maximize value, increase NOI, or maintain a market-competitive position and/or achieve property stabilization; or (v) for the senior living operations and triple-net leased segments, those properties that are scheduled to undergo operator or business model transitions, or have transitioned operators or business models after the start of the prior comparison period.        

To eliminate the impact of exchange rate movements, all portfolio performance-based disclosures assume constant exchange rates across comparable periods, using the following methodology: the current period’s results are shown in actual reported USD, while prior comparison period’s results are adjusted and converted to USD based on the average exchange rate for the current period.

56

 For the Years Ended December 31,
 2017 2016 2015
 (In thousands)
Income from continuing operations$643,949
 $554,209
 $389,539
Discontinued operations(110) (922) 11,103
Gain on real estate dispositions717,273
 98,203
 18,580
Net income1,361,112
 651,490
 419,222
Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests4,642
 2,259
 1,379
Net income attributable to common stockholders1,356,470
 649,231
 417,843
Adjustments:     
Interest and other income(6,034) (876) (1,115)
Interest448,196
 419,740
 427,542
Depreciation and amortization887,948
 898,924
 973,665
General, administrative and professional fees135,490
 126,875
 128,044
Loss on extinguishment of debt, net754
 2,779
 14,411
Merger-related expenses and deal costs10,645
 25,556
 149,346
Other20,052
 9,988
 19,577
Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests4,642
 2,259
 1,499
Loss (income) from unconsolidated entities561
 (4,358) 1,420
Income tax benefit(59,799) (31,343) (39,284)
Gain on real estate dispositions(717,273) (98,202) (18,811)
NOI (including amounts in discontinued operations)2,081,652
 2,000,573
 2,074,137
Discontinued operations
 
 (198,996)
NOI (excluding amounts in discontinued operations)$2,081,652
 $2,000,573
 $1,875,141


Asset/Liability Management


Asset/liability management, a key element of enterprise risk management, is designed to support the achievement of our business strategy, while ensuring that we maintain appropriate and tolerable levels of market risk (primarily interest rate risk and foreign currency exchange risk) and credit risk. Effective management of these risks is a contributing factor to the absolute levels and variability of our FFO and net worth. The following discussion addresses our integrated management of assets and liabilities, including the use of derivative financial instruments.


Market Risk


We are exposed to market risk related to changes in interest rates with respect to borrowings under our unsecured revolving credit facility, our secured construction revolver and our unsecured term loans, certain of our mortgage loans that are floating rate obligations, mortgage loans receivable that bear interest at floating rates and marketable debtavailable for sale securities. These market risks result primarily from changes in LIBOR rates or prime rates. To manage these risks, we continuously monitor our level of floating rate debt with respect to total debt and other factors, including our assessment of current and future economic conditions.

57


The table below sets forth certain information with respect to our debt, excluding premiums and discounts.
As of December 31, As of December 31,
2017 2016 2015 202020192018
(Dollars in thousands) (Dollars in thousands)
Balance:     Balance:   
Fixed rate:     Fixed rate:   
Senior notes and other, unhedged portion$8,218,369
 $7,854,264
 $7,534,459
Floating to fixed rate swap on term loan200,000
 200,000
 
Mortgage loans and other(1)
1,010,517
 1,426,837
 1,554,062
Senior notesSenior notes$8,869,036$8,584,056$7,945,598
Unsecured term loansUnsecured term loans200,000200,000400,000
Secured revolving construction credit facilitySecured revolving construction credit facility160,492
Mortgage loans and otherMortgage loans and other1,389,2271,325,854698,136
Variable rate:     Variable rate:   
Fixed to floating rate swap on senior notes400,000
 
 
Senior notesSenior notes235,664231,018
Unsecured revolving credit facility535,832
 146,538
 180,683
Unsecured revolving credit facility39,395120,787765,919
Unsecured term loans, unhedged portion700,000
 1,271,215
 1,568,477
Unsecured term loansUnsecured term loans392,773385,030500,000
Commercial paper notesCommercial paper notes567,450
Secured revolving construction credit facility2,868
 
 
Secured revolving construction credit facility154,09890,488
Mortgage loans and other(1)
298,047
 292,060
 433,339
Mortgage loans and otherMortgage loans and other702,878671,115429,561
Total$11,365,633
 $11,190,914
 $11,271,020
Total$11,983,071$12,245,802$10,829,702
Percent of total debt:     Percent of total debt:   
Fixed rate:     Fixed rate:   
Senior notes and other, unhedged portion72.3% 70.2% 66.9%
Floating to fixed rate swap on term loan1.8
 1.8
 
Mortgage loans and other(1)
8.9
 12.7
 13.8
Senior notesSenior notes73.9 %70.1 %73.4 %
Unsecured term loansUnsecured term loans1.7 1.6 3.7 
Secured revolving construction credit facilitySecured revolving construction credit facility— 1.3 — 
Mortgage loans and otherMortgage loans and other11.6 10.8 6.4 
Variable rate:     Variable rate:   
Fixed to floating rate swap on senior notes3.5
 
 
Senior notesSenior notes2.0 1.9 — 
Unsecured revolving credit facility4.7
 1.3
 1.6
Unsecured revolving credit facility0.3 1.0 7.1 
Unsecured term loans, unhedged portion6.2
 11.4
 13.9
Unsecured term loansUnsecured term loans3.3 3.1 4.6 
Commercial paper notesCommercial paper notes— 4.7 — 
Secured revolving construction credit facility0.0
 
 
Secured revolving construction credit facility1.3 — 0.8 
Mortgage loans and other(1)
2.6
 2.6
 3.8
Mortgage loans and otherMortgage loans and other5.9 5.5 4.0 
Total100.0% 100.0% 100.0%Total100.0 %100.0 %100.0 %
Weighted average interest rate at end of period:     Weighted average interest rate at end of period:   
Fixed rate:     Fixed rate:   
Senior notes and other, unhedged portion3.7% 3.6% 3.5%
Floating to fixed rate swap on term loan2.1
 2.2
 
Mortgage loans and other(1)
5.2
 5.6
 5.7
Senior notesSenior notes3.7 %3.7 %3.8 %
Unsecured term loansUnsecured term loans3.6 2.0 2.8 
Secured revolving construction credit facilitySecured revolving construction credit facility— 4.5 — 
Mortgage loans and otherMortgage loans and other3.5 3.7 4.4 
Variable rate:     Variable rate:
Fixed to floating rate swap on senior notes2.3
 
 
Senior notesSenior notes1.0 2.5 — 
Unsecured revolving credit facility2.3
 1.9
 1.4
Unsecured revolving credit facility1.0 2.4 3.2 
Unsecured term loans, unhedged portion2.3
 1.7
 1.4
Unsecured term loansUnsecured term loans1.4 2.9 3.3 
Commercial paper notesCommercial paper notes— 2.0 — 
Secured revolving construction credit facility3.1
 
 
Secured revolving construction credit facility1.9 — 4.1 
Mortgage loans and other(1)
2.9
 2.1
 2.0
Mortgage loans and otherMortgage loans and other1.9 3.4 3.4 
Total3.6
 3.6
 3.5
Total3.4 3.5 3.7 

(1)
Excludes mortgage debt of $57.4 million and $22.9 million related to real estate assets classified as held for sale as of December 31, 2017 and 2015, respectively. All amounts were included in liabilities related to assets held for sale on our Consolidated Balance Sheets.


The variable rate debt in the table above reflects, in part, the effect of $549.9$146.7 million notional amount of interest rate swaps with maturities ranging from March 20182022 to January 2023May 2022, in each case that effectively convert fixed rate debt to variable
58


rate debt. In addition, the fixed rate debt in the table above reflects, in part, the effect of $250.9$305.9 million and C$145.7 million notional amount of interest rate

swaps with maturities ranging from October 2018January 2023 to September 2027,December 2029, in each case that effectively convert variable rate debt to fixed rate debt.

In February 2016, we entered into a $200 million notional amount interest rate swap with a maturity of August 3, 2020 that effectively converts LIBOR-based floating rate debt to fixed rate debt, setting LIBOR at 1.132% through the maturity date See “Note 10 – Senior Notes Payable and Other Debt” of the swap.Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements included in Part II, Item 8 of this Annual Report.     

In July 2016, we entered into $225 million notional forward starting swaps that reduced our exposure to fluctuations in interest rates between July and the September issuance of 3.25% senior notes due 2026. On the issuance date, we realized a gain of $1.9 million from these swaps that is being recognized over the life of the notes using an effective interest method.

In January and February 2017, we entered into a total of $275 million of notional forward starting swaps with an effective date of April 3, 2017 that reduced our exposure to fluctuations in interest rates related to changes in rates between the trade dates of the swaps and the forecasted issuance of long-term debt. The rate on the notional amounts was locked at a weighted average rate of 2.33%. In March 2017, these swaps were terminated in conjunction with the issuance of the 3.850% senior notes due 2027, which resulted in a $0.8 million gain that is being recognized over the life of the notes using the effective interest method.

In March 2017, we entered into interest rate swaps totaling a notional amount of $400.0 million with a maturity of January 15, 2023, effectively converting fixed rate debt to three month LIBOR-based floating rate debt.  As a result, we will receive a fixed rate on the swap of 3.10% and will pay a floating rate equal to three month LIBOR plus a weighted average swap spread of 0.98%.

In June 2017, we entered into a total of $125 million of notional forward starting swaps with an effective date of January 15, 2018 and a maturity of January 15, 2028, that reduced our exposure to fluctuations in interest rates related to changes in rates between the trade dates of the swaps and the forecasted issuance of long-term debt. The rate on the notional amounts was locked at a weighted average rate of 2.1832%.

In December 2017, we entered into a total of $75 million of notional forward starting swaps with an effective date of February 15, 2018 and a maturity of February 15, 2028, that reduced our exposure to fluctuations in interest rates related to changes in rates between the trade dates of the swaps and the forecasted issuance of long-term debt.  The rate on the notional amounts was locked at a weighted average rate of 2.3705%


The increasedecrease in our outstanding variable rate debt at December 31, 20172020 compared to December 31, 20162019 is primarily attributable to reduced borrowings on our revolving credit facility and commercial paper program, partially offset by the $400.0 million notional amountchange in presentation of the secured revolving construction credit facility to variable rate debt. The secured revolving construction credit facility was previously reflected as fixed rate debt due to an interest rate swap mentioned above and increased borrowings under our unsecured revolving credit facility, partially offset by term loan repayments.

Pursuant towhich had effectively converted the terms of certain leases with one of our tenants, if interest rates increase on certain variable rate debt that we have totaling $80.0 million as of December 31, 2017, our tenant is required to pay us additional rent (on a dollar-for-dollar basis) in an amount equal to the increase inassociated interest expense resulting from the increased interest rates. Therefore, the increasevariable to fixed until its expiration in interest expense related to this debt is equally offset by an increase in additional rent due to us from the tenant. August 2020.

Assuming a 100 basis point increase in the weighted average interest rate related to our variable rate debt and assuming no change in our variable rate debt outstanding as of December 31, 2017,2020, interest expense for 2018on an annualized basis would increase by approximately $18.2$14.7 million, or $0.05$0.04 per diluted common share.


As of December 31, 20172020 and 2016,2019, our joint venture partners’ aggregate share of total debt was $76.7$271.6 million and $80.9$228.2 million, respectively, with respect to certain properties we owned through consolidated joint ventures. Total debt does not include our portion of debt related to investments in unconsolidated real estate entities, which was $90.3$213.0 million and $122.0$60.6 million as of December 31, 20172020 and 2016,2019, respectively.


The fair value of our fixed and variable rate debt is based on current market interest rates at which we could obtain similar borrowings. ForIncreases in market interest rates typically result in a decrease in the fair value of fixed rate debt while decreases in market interest rates typically result in an increase in the fair value of fixed rate fluctuations generallydate. While changes in market interest rates affect the fair value butof our fixed rate debt, these changes do not affect the interest expense associated with our earnings or cash flows.fixed rate debt. Therefore, interest rate risk does not have a significant impact on our fixed rate debt obligations until their maturity or earlier prepayment and refinancing. If interest rates have risen at the time we seek to refinance our fixed rate debt, whether at maturity or otherwise, our future earnings and cash flows could be adversely affected by additional borrowing costs. Conversely, lower interest rates at the time of refinancing may reduce our overall borrowing costs.


To highlight the sensitivity of our fixed rate debt to changes in interest rates, the following summary shows the effects of a hypothetical instantaneous change of 100 basis points in interest rates asrates:
 As of December 31,
 20202019
 (In thousands)
Gross book value$10,458,262 $10,270,402 
Fair value11,550,236 10,784,441 
Fair value reflecting change in interest rates:
-100 basis points12,204,507 11,438,507 
+100 basis points10,951,483 10,196,943 

The change in fair value of our fixed rate debt from December 31, 2017 and 2016:
2019 to December 31, 2020 was due primarily to 2020 senior note issuances, net of repayments, partially offset by the change in presentation of the secured revolving construction credit facility to variable rate debt. The secured revolving construction credit facility was previously reflected as fixed rate debt due to an interest rate swap which had effectively converted the associated interest expense from variable to fixed until its expiration in August 2020.
 As of December 31,
 2017 2016
 (In thousands)
Gross book value$9,428,886
 $9,481,101
Fair value(1)
9,640,893
 9,600,621
Fair value reflecting change in interest rates(1):
   
-100 basis points10,148,313
 10,117,238
+100 basis points9,184,409
 9,133,292

(1)
The change in fair value of our fixed rate debt from December 31, 2016 to December 31, 2017 was due primarily to changes in the fair market value interest rates and 2017 senior note issuances, partially offset by repayments of senior notes and fixed rate mortgage debt.


As of December 31, 20172020 and 2016,2019, the fair value of our secured and non-mortgage loans receivable, based on our estimates of currently prevailing rates for comparable loans, was $1.3 billion$565.7 million and $709.6$710.5 million, respectively. See “NOTE 6—LOANS RECEIVABLE AND INVESTMENTS”“Note 6 – Loans Receivable and “NOTE 11—FAIR VALUES OF FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS”Investments” and “Note 11 – Fair Values of Financial Instruments” of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements included in Part II, Item 8 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.Report.


As a result of our Canadian and United Kingdom operations, we are subject to fluctuations in certain foreign currency exchange rates that may, from time to time, affect our financial condition and operating performance. Based solely on our results for the year ended December 31, 20172020 (including the impact of existing hedging arrangements), if the value of the U.S. dollar relative to the British pound and Canadian dollar were to increase or decrease by one standard deviation compared to the average exchange rate during the year, our normalized FFO per share for the year ended December 31, 20172020 would decrease or
59


increase, as applicable, by less than $0.01 per share or 0.1%1%. We will continue to mitigate these risks through a layered approach to hedging looking out for the next year and continual assessment of our foreign operational capital structure. Nevertheless, we cannot assure you that any such fluctuations will not have an effect on our earnings.


During the year ended December 31, 2017, the amount of foreign currency translation loss included in accumulated other comprehensive loss on our Consolidated Balance Sheets decreased by $20.6 million, primarily as a result of the remeasurement of our properties located in the United Kingdom.

Concentration and Credit Risk


We use concentration ratios to identify, understand and evaluate the potential impact of economic downturns and other adverse events that may affect our asset types, geographic locations, business models, and tenants, operators and managers. We evaluate concentration risk in terms of investment mix and operations mix. Investment mix measures the percentage of our investments that is concentrated in a specific asset type or that is operated or managed by a particular tenant, operator or manager. Operations mix measures the percentage of our operating results that is attributed to a particular tenant, operator or manager, geographic location or business model. The following tables reflect our concentration risk as of the dates and for the periods presented:
 As of
December 31,
 20202019
Investment mix by asset type(1):
  
Senior housing communities63.5 %62.2 %
MOBs19.7 19.3 
Research and innovation centers7.1 8.7 
Health systems5.2 5.1 
IRFs and LTACs1.7 1.6 
SNFs0.7 0.7 
Secured loans receivable and investments, net2.1 2.4 
Investment mix by tenant, operator and manager(1):
  
Atria20.8 %20.4 %
Sunrise10.4 10.3 
Brookdale Senior Living8.2 7.7 
Ardent4.9 4.7 
Kindred1.1 1.0 
All other54.6 55.9 

(1)Ratios are based on the gross book value of consolidated real estate investments (excluding properties classified as held for sale) as of each reporting date.
60


 
As of
December 31,
 2017 2016
Investment mix by asset type(1):
   
Seniors housing communities60.2% 61.8%
MOBs19.7
 20.7
Life science and innovation centers7.4
 6.1
Health systems5.4
 5.6
IRFs and LTACs1.7
 1.7
SNFs0.7
 1.4
Secured loans receivable and investments, net4.9
 2.7
Investment mix by tenant, operator and manager(1):
   
Atria22.3% 22.6%
Sunrise10.8
 11.3
Brookdale Senior Living7.5
 8.1
Ardent4.9
 5.1
Kindred1.1
 1.8
All other53.4
 51.1
 For the Years Ended December 31,
 202020192018
Operations mix by tenant and operator and business model:   
Revenues(1):
   
Senior living operations58.0 %55.8 %55.3 %
Brookdale Senior Living(2)
4.4 4.7 4.3 
Ardent3.2 3.1 3.1 
Kindred3.5 3.3 3.5 
All others30.9 33.1 33.8 
Adjusted EBITDA:  
Senior living operations30.8 %32.5 %31.3 %
Brookdale Senior Living(2)
9.5 8.1 6.7 
Ardent7.0 5.4 5.1 
Kindred7.5 5.8 5.6 
All others45.2 48.2 51.3 
NOI:  
Senior living operations29.4 %31.1 %30.7 %
Brookdale Senior Living(2)
9.0 8.7 7.6 
Ardent6.6 5.8 5.7 
Kindred7.1 6.3 6.4 
All others47.9 48.1 49.6 
Operations mix by geographic location(3):
  
California15.7 %15.9 %15.7 %
New York8.1 8.8 8.4 
Texas6.1 6.0 6.2 
Pennsylvania4.6 4.7 4.6 
Illinois4.1 4.0 4.4 
All others61.4 60.6 60.7 

(1)
Ratios are based on the gross book value of consolidated real estate investments (excluding properties classified as held for sale) as of each reporting date.


(1)Total revenues include medical office building and other services revenue, revenue from loans and investments and interest and other income (including amounts related to assets classified as held for sale).
 
For the Year Ended
December 31,
 2017 2016 2015
Operations mix by tenant and operator and business model:     
Revenues(1):
     
Senior living operations51.6% 53.6% 55.1%
Brookdale Senior Living(2)
4.7
 4.8
 5.3
Ardent3.1
 3.1
 1.3
Kindred4.7
 5.4
 5.7
All others35.7
 33.1
 32.6
Adjusted EBITDA(3):
     
Senior living operations28.7% 30.9% 29.7%
Brookdale Senior Living(2)
7.6
 7.9
 8.2
Ardent5.1
 5.1
 2.0
Kindred7.7
 8.9
 8.8
All others50.9
 47.2
 51.3
NOI(4):
     
Senior living operations28.5% 30.2% 32.1%
Brookdale Senior Living(2)
8.0
 8.3
 9.3
Ardent5.3
 5.3
 2.3
Kindred8.1
 9.2
 9.9
All others49.9
 47.0
 46.4
Operations mix by geographic location(5):
     
California15.3% 15.3% 15.4%
New York8.6
 8.8
 8.8
Texas5.8
 6.3
 6.1
Illinois4.8
 4.9
 4.9
Florida4.4
 4.5
 4.6
All others61.1
 60.2
 60.2
(2)Results exclude eight senior housing communities which are included in the senior living operations reportable business segment. 2018 results include the impact of a net non-cash charge of $21.3 million related to April 2018 lease extensions.

(3)Ratios are based on total revenues (including amounts related to assets classified as held for sale) for each period presented.
(1)
Total revenues include medical office building and other services revenue, revenue from loans and investments and interest and other income (excluding amounts in discontinued operations and including amounts related to assets classified as held for sale).
(2)
Excludes one seniors housing community included in the senior living operations reportable business segment.
(3)
Includes amounts in discontinued operations.
(4)
Excludes amounts in discontinued operations.
(5)
Ratios are based on total revenues (excluding amounts in discontinued operations and including amounts related to assets classified as held for sale) for each period presented.


See “Non-GAAP Financial Measures” included elsewhere in this Annual Report on Form 10-K for additional disclosure and reconciliations of net income from continuing operations,attributable to common stockholders, as computed in accordance with GAAP, to Adjusted EBITDA and NOI, respectively.


We derive a significant portion of our revenues by leasing assets under long-term triple-net leases in which the rental rate is generally fixed with annual escalators, subject to certain limitations. Some of our triple-net lease escalators are contingent upon the satisfaction of specified facility revenue parameters or based on increases in the Consumer Price Index (“CPI”), with caps, floors or collars. We also earn revenues directly from individual residents in our seniorssenior housing communities that are managed by independent operators, such as Atria and Sunrise, and tenants in our office buildings. For the year ended December 31, 2017, 52.9%2020, 61.0% of our Adjusted EBITDA (including amounts in discontinued operations) was derived from our senior living operations and office operations, for which rental rates may fluctuate more frequently upon lease rollovers and renewals due to shorter termshorter-term leases and changing economic or market conditions.



The concentration of our triple-net leased properties segment revenues and operating income that are attributed to Brookdale Senior Living, Ardent and Kindred creates credit risk. If any of Brookdale Senior Living, Ardent or Kindred becomes unable or unwilling to satisfy its obligations to us or to renew its leases with us upon expiration of the terms thereof, our financial condition and results of operations could decline, and our ability to service our indebtedness and to make
61


distributions to our stockholders could be impaired. See “Risk Factors—Risks Arising from Our Business—Our leasesBusiness Operations and other agreements with Brookdale Senior Living, Ardent and Kindred account for aStrategy Risks—A significant portion of our revenues and operating income; any failure, inability or unwillingness byincome is dependent on a limited number of tenants and managers, including Brookdale Senior Living, Ardent, or Kindred, to satisfy its obligations under our agreements could have a Material Adverse Effect on usAtria and Sunrise.” included in Part I, Item 1A of this Annual Report on Form 10-K and “NOTE 3—CONCENTRATION OF CREDIT RISK”“Note 3 – Concentration of Credit Risk” of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements included in Part II, Item 8 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.Report.


We regularly monitor and assess any changes in the relative credit risk of our significant tenants, and in particular those tenants that have recourse obligations under our triple-net leases. The ratios and metrics we use to evaluate a significant tenant’s liquidity and creditworthiness depend on facts and circumstances specific to that tenant and the industry or industries in which it operates, including without limitation the tenant’s credit history and economic conditions related to the tenant, its operations and the markets in which the tenant operates, that may vary over time. Among other things, we may (i) review and analyze information regarding the real estate, seniorssenior housing and healthcare industries generally, publicly available information regarding the significant tenant, and information required to be provided by the tenant under the terms of its lease agreements with us, (ii) examine monthly and/or quarterly financial statements of the significant tenant to the extent publicly available or otherwise provided under the terms of our lease agreements, and (iii) participate in periodic discussions and in-person meetings with representatives of the significant tenant.  Using this information, we calculate multiple financial ratios (which may, but do not necessarily, include net debt to EBITDAR or EBITDARM,leverage, fixed charge coverage and tangible net worth), after making certain adjustments based on our judgment, and assess other metrics we deem relevant to an understanding of the significant tenant’s credit risk.


Because Atria and Sunrise manage our properties in exchange for the receipt of a management fee from us, we are not directly exposed to the credit risk of our managers in the same manner or to the same extent as our triple-net tenants. However, we rely on our managers’ personnel, expertise, technical resources and information systems, proprietary information, good faith and judgment to manage our senior living operations efficiently and effectively. We also rely on Atria and Sunrise to set appropriate resident fees, to provide accurate property-level financials results for our properties in a timely manner and otherwise operate our seniorssenior housing communities in compliance with the terms of our management agreements and all applicable laws and regulations. Although we have various rights as the property owner under our management agreements, including various rights to terminate and exercise remedies under the agreements as provided therein, Atria’s or Sunrise’s failure, inability or unwillingness to satisfy its respective obligations under those agreements, to efficiently and effectively manage our properties or to provide timely and accurate accounting information with respect thereto could have a Material Adverse Effect on us. See “Risk Factors—Risks Arising from Our Business—The properties managed by AtriaBusiness Operations and Sunrise account for a significant portion of our revenues and operating income; adverse developments in Atria’s or Sunrise’s business and affairs or financial condition could have a Material Adverse Effect on us” and “—We have rights to terminate our management agreements with Atria and Sunrise in whole or with respect to specific properties under certain circumstances, and we may be unable to replace Atria or Sunrise if our management agreements are terminated or not renewedStrategy Risks.” included in Part I, Item 1A of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.Report.


OurWe hold a 34% ownership interest in Atria, which entitles us to certaincustomary minority rights and minority protections, as well as the right to appoint two of the six members on the Atria Board of Directors.


Triple-Net Lease Performance and Expirations


IfAny failure, inability or unwillingness by our tenants to satisfy their obligations under our triple-net leases could have a material adverse effect on us. Also, if our tenants are not able or willing to renew our triple-net leases upon expiration, we may be unable to reposition the applicable properties on a timely basis or on the same or better economic terms, if at all. Although our lease expirations are staggered, the non-renewal of some or all of our triple-net leases that expire in any given year could have a Material Adverse Effectmaterial adverse effect on us. During the year ended December 31, 2017,2020, we had no triple-net lease renewals or expirations without renewal that, in the aggregate, had a material impact on our financial condition or results of operations for that period. See “Risk Factors—Risks Arising from Our Business—Business Operations and Strategy Risks—If we must replace any of our tenants or operators,managers, we mightmay be unable to reposition the propertiesdo so on as favorable terms, or at all, and we could be subject to delays, limitations and expenses, which could have a Material Adverse Effect on usadversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.” included in Part I, Item IA of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.Report.



62


The following table summarizes our triple-net lease expirations in our triple-net leased properties segment currently scheduled to occur over the next ten10 years (excluding leases related toas of December 31, 2020:
Number of
Properties(1)
2020 Annualized Base Rent (“ABR”)(2)
% of 2020 Total Triple-Net Leased Properties Segment Rental Income
 (Dollars in thousands)
2021$12,062 1.7 %
20225,799 0.8 
2023(3)
31,240 4.5 
202426 13,970 2.0 
2025179 234,549 33.7 
202639 53,660 7.7 
20278,784 1.3 
202827 25,196 3.6 
202921 22,788 3.3 
20304,748 0.7 
(1)Excludes assets sold or classified as held for sale, asunconsolidated entities development properties not yet operational, unconsolidated joint ventures and land parcels.
(2)ABR represents the annualized impact of December 31, 2017):
the current period’s cash base rent at 100% share for consolidated entities. ABR does not include common area maintenance charges, the amortization of above/below market lease intangibles or other noncash items. ABR is used only for the purpose of determining lease expirations.
 
Number of
Properties
 2017 Annual Rental Income % of 2017 Total Triple-Net Leased Properties Segment Rental Income
 (Dollars in thousands)
2018
 $
 %
201970
 120,625
 14.4
202042
 36,129
 4.3
202153
 52,509
 6.3
202226
 18,536
 2.2
202310
 30,542
 3.6
202436
 22,487
 2.7
202559
 128,433
 15.3
202647
 42,632
 5.1
20277
 8,625
 1.0
(3)Relates to 6 LTACs leased by Kindred. While the lease term expires in 2023, Kindred may extend the term for 5 years by delivering a renewal notice to the Company 12 to 18 months prior to expiration.


Liquidity and Capital Resources

As of December 31, 2017, we had a total of $81.4 million of unrestricted cash and cash equivalents, operating cash and cash related to our senior living operations and office operations reportable business segments that is deposited and held in property-level accounts. Funds maintained in the property-level accounts are used primarily for the payment of property-level expenses, debt service payments and certain capital expenditures. As of December 31, 2017, we also had escrow deposits and restricted cash of $106.9 million, $2.4 billion of unused borrowing capacity available under our unsecured revolving credit facility and $397.1 million of unused borrowing capacity available under our secured revolving credit facility.


During 2017,2020, our principal sources of liquidity were cash flows from operations, proceeds from the issuance of debt and equity securities, borrowings under our unsecured revolving credit facility, and proceeds from asset sales and cash on hand.sales.


For the next 12 months, our principal liquidity needs are to: (i) fund operating expenses; (ii) meet our debt service requirements; (iii) repay maturing mortgage and other debt, including $700.0 million of senior notes;debt; (iv) fund capital expenditures; (v) fund acquisitions, investments and commitments includingand any development and redevelopment activities; (v) fund capital expenditures; and (vi) make distributions to our stockholders and unitholders, as required for us to continue to qualify as a REIT. In addition,Depending upon the availability of external capital, we may electbelieve our liquidity is sufficient to prepay outstanding indebtedness prior to maturity based on our analysisfund these uses of various factors. cash. We expect that these liquidity needs generally will be satisfied by a combination of the following: cash flows from operations, cash on hand, debt assumptions and financings (including secured financings), issuances of debt and equity securities, dispositions of assets (in whole or in part through joint venture arrangements with third parties) and borrowings under our revolving credit facilities.facilities and commercial paper program. However, an inability to access liquidity through multiple capital sources concurrently could have a Material Adverse Effectmaterial adverse effect on us.

While continuing decreased revenue and net operating income as a result of the COVID-19 pandemic could lead to downgrades of our long-term credit rating and therefore adversely impact our cost of borrowing, we currently believe we will continue to have access to one or more debt markets during the duration of the pandemic and could seek to enter into secured debt financings or issue debt and equity securities to satisfy our liquidity needs, although no assurances can be made in this regard. See “COVID-19 Update.” See “Risk Factors—Risks Arising from Our Capital Structure—Structure Risks—We are highly dependent on access to the capital markets. Limitations on our ability to access capital could have an adverse effect on us, including our ability to make required payments on our debt obligations, make distributions to our stockholders or make future investments necessary to implement our business strategystrategy.” included in Part I, Item 1A of this Annual Report.

2020 Capital Conservation Actions

In 2020, we executed on a multi-pronged capital conservation strategy to mitigate the impact of COVID-19, which included reducing our planned capital expenditures and capital commitments. We also established a quarterly dividend of $0.45 per share beginning in the second quarter, which was a reduction from the first quarter dividend of $0.7925 per share. This action enabled us to conserve approximately $130 million of cash per quarter compared to the prior dividend level. Also, in June 2020, we eliminated roles representing over 25% of our corporate positions, excluding onsite field personnel. For the
63


second half of 2020, the base salaries of our CEO and other executive officers were voluntarily reduced by 20% and 10%, respectively. Primarily as a result of these capital conservation actions, our 2020 general and administrative expenses are $29 million lower than 2019.

See “Note 10 – Senior Notes Payable and Other Debt” of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements included in Part II, Item 8 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.for further information regarding our significant financing activities.


Credit Facilities, Commercial Paper and Unsecured Term Loans


In April 2017, we entered into anAs of December 31, 2020, our unsecured credit facility was comprised of a $3.0 billion unsecured revolving credit facility priced at LIBOR plus 0.875%, that replaced our previous $2.0 based on the Company’s debt rating, which was scheduled to mature in 2021. In January 2021, we entered into an amended and restated unsecured credit facility (the “New Credit Facility”) comprised of a $2.75 billion unsecured revolving credit facility initially priced at LIBOR plus 1.0%. The new unsecured credit facility was also comprised of our $200.0 million term loan that was scheduled to mature in 2018 and our $278.6 million term loan that was scheduled to mature in 2019. The 2018 and 2019 term loans were priced at LIBOR plus 1.05%. In August 2017, we used most of the proceeds from the sale of 22 SNFs to repay the balances then outstanding0.825% based on the 2018 and 2019 term loans, and recognized a loss on extinguishment ofCompany’s debt of $0.5 million. See "NOTE 5—DISPOSITIONS” of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements included in Item 8 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.


rating. The unsecured revolving credit facilityNew Credit Facility matures in 2021,2025, but may be extended at our option subject to the satisfaction of certain conditions, for two additional periods of six months each. The unsecured revolving credit facilityNew Credit Facility also includes an accordion feature that permits us to increase our aggregate borrowing capacity thereunder to up to $3.75 billion.


As of December 31, 2017, we had $535.82020, $39.4 million of borrowingswas outstanding $14.5 million of letters of credit outstanding and $2.4 billion of unused borrowing capacity available under ourthe unsecured revolving credit facility.facility with an additional $24.9 million restricted to support outstanding letters of credit. In addition, we limit our utilization of the unsecured revolving credit facility, to the extent necessary, to support our commercial paper program when commercial paper notes are outstanding. We had $2.9 billion in available liquidity under the unsecured revolving credit facility as of December 31, 2020. In connection with the New Credit Facility, we paid off all amounts outstanding under the existing unsecured revolving credit facility as of January 29, 2021 by drawing down the same amount on the New Credit Facility.    


Our wholly owned subsidiary, Ventas Realty, Limited Partnership (“Ventas Realty”), may issue from time to time unsecured commercial paper notes up to a maximum aggregate amount outstanding at any time of $1.0 billion. The notes are sold under customary terms in the United States commercial paper note market and are ranked pari passu with all of Ventas Realty’s other unsecured senior indebtedness. The notes are fully and unconditionally guaranteed by Ventas, Inc. As of December 31, 2020, we had no borrowings outstanding under our commercial paper program.

As of December 31, 2017,2020, we also had a $900.0$200.0 million unsecured term loan due 2020 priced at LIBOR plus 0.975%.         0.90% that matures in 2023.  The term loan also includes an accordion feature that effectively permits us to increase our aggregate borrowings thereunder to up to $800.0 million.


In September 2017,As of December 31, 2020, we entered intohad a new $400.0 million secured revolving construction credit facility whichwith $154.1 million of borrowings outstanding. The secured revolving construction credit facility matures in 2022 and will beis primarily used to finance life sciencethe development of research and innovation centercenters and other construction projects. As of December 31, 2017, we had $2.9 million borrowings outstanding under the secured revolving construction credit facility.

The agreements governing our credit facilities require us to comply with various financial and other restrictive covenants. See “NOTE 10—SENIOR NOTES PAYABLE AND OTHER DEBT” of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements included in Item 8 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K. We were in compliance with all of these covenants at December 31, 2017.

Senior Notes


As of December 31, 2017,2020, we had $7.6a C$500 million unsecured term loan facility priced at Canadian Dollar Offered Rate (“CDOR”) plus 0.90% that matures in 2025.

Senior Notes

In April 2020, Ventas Realty issued and sold $500.0 million aggregate principal amount of 4.75% senior notes due 2030 at an amount equal to 97.86% of par.

In October 2020, we redeemed, pursuant to a cash tender offer, $236.3 million aggregate principal amount then outstanding of our 3.25% senior notes due 2022 at 104.14% of par value, plus accrued and unpaid interest to the payment date. As a result, we recognized a loss on extinguishment of debt of $11.1 million during the year ended December 31, 2020.

As of December 31, 2020, we had outstanding $7.7 billion aggregate principal amount of senior notes issued by our subsidiary, Ventas Realty Limited Partnership (“Ventas Realty”), and guaranteed($263.7 million of which was co-issued by Ventas, Inc. outstanding as follows:

$700.0 million principal amount of 2.00% senior notes due 2018 (co-issued with Ventas Realty’s wholly owned subsidiary, Ventas Capital Corporation);

$600.0 million principal amount of 4.00% senior notes due 2019 (co-issued with Ventas Realty’s wholly owned subsidiary, Ventas Capital Corporation);

$500.0 million principal amount of 2.700% senior notes due 2020 (co-issued with Ventas Realty’s wholly owned subsidiary, Ventas Capital Corporation);

$700.0 million principal amount of 4.750% senior notes due 2021 (co-issued with Ventas Realty’s wholly owned subsidiary, Ventas Capital Corporation);

$600.0 million principal amount of 4.25% senior notes due 2022 (co-issued with Ventas Realty’s wholly owned subsidiary, Ventas Capital Corporation);

$500.0 million principal amount of 3.25% senior notes due 2022 (co-issued with Ventas Realty’s wholly owned subsidiary, Ventas Capital Corporation);

$400.0 million principal amount of 3.125% senior notes due 2023;

$400.0 million principal amount of 3.100% senior notes due 2023;

$400.0 million principal amount of 3.750% senior notes due 2024;

$600.0 million principal amount of 3.500% senior notes due 2025;

$500.0 million principal amount of 4.125% senior notes due 2026;

$450.0 million principal amount of 3.25% senior notes due 2026;

$400.0 million principal amount of 3.850% senior notes due 2027;

$258.8 million principal amount of 5.45% senior notes due 2043 (co-issued with Ventas Realty’s wholly owned subsidiary, Ventas Capital Corporation);

$300.0 million principal amount of 5.70% senior notes due 2043; and

$300.0 million principal amount of 4.375% senior notes due 2045.

As of December 31, 2017, we had $75.4, approximately $75.2 million aggregate principal amount of senior notes ofissued by Nationwide Health Properties, Inc. (“NHP”) and assumed by our subsidiary, Nationwide Health Properties, LLC (“NHP LLC”), as successor to NHP, outstanding as follows:

$52.4 million principal amountin connection with our acquisition of 6.90% senior notes due 2037 (subject to earlier repayment at the option of the holder);NHP, and

$23.0 million principal amount of 6.59% senior notes due 2038 (subject to earlier repayment at the option of the holder).

In addition, as of December 31, 2017, we had $0.9 C$1.7 billion aggregate principal amount of senior notes ofissued by our wholly owned subsidiary, Ventas Canada Finance Limited (“Ventas Canada”). All of the senior notes issued by Ventas Realty and Ventas Canada are unconditionally guaranteed by Ventas, Inc. outstanding as follows:


$318.0 million (C$400.0 million) principal amount of 3.00% senior notes, series A due 2019;
64



$198.8 million (C$250.0 million) principal amount of 3.300% senior notes, Series C due 2022;

$218.7 million (C$275.0 million) principal amount of 2.55% senior notes, series D due 2023; and

$198.8 million (C$250.0 million) principal amount of 4.125% senior notes, series B due 2024.

In May 2016, Ventas RealtyFebruary 2021, in order to reduce near-term maturities, we issued and sold $400.0a make-whole redemption for the entirety of the $400 million outstanding aggregate principal amount of 3.125%3.10% senior notes due 2023 at a public offering price equal to 99.343% of par, for total proceeds of $397.4 million before the underwriting discount and expenses.

In June 2016, we redeemed $455.5 million aggregate principal amount then outstanding of our 1.55% senior notes due September 2016 at a public offering price of 100.335% of par, plus accrued and unpaid interest to the redemption date, and recognized a loss on extinguishment of debt of $2.1 million.January 2023. The redemption wasis expected to settle in March 2021 and will be funded using proceeds from our May 2016 senior note issuance,primarily with cash on hand and borrowings under our unsecured revolving credit facility. In July 2016, we repaid the remaining balance then outstanding of our 1.55% senior notes due September 2016 of $94.5 million and recognized a loss on extinguishment of debt of $0.3 million.hand.

In September 2016, Ventas Realty issued and sold $450.0 million aggregate principal amount of 3.25% senior notes due 2026 at a public offering price equal to 99.811% of par, for total proceeds of $449.1 million before the underwriting discount and expenses.     

In March 2017, Ventas Realty issued and sold $400.0 million aggregate principal amount of 3.100% senior notes due 2023 at a public offering price equal to 99.280% of par, for total proceeds of $397.1 million before the underwriting discount and expenses, and $400.0 million aggregate principal amount of 3.850% senior notes due 2027 at a public offering price equal to 99.196% of par, for total proceeds of $396.8 million before the underwriting discount and expenses.

In April 2017, we repaid in full, at par, $300.0 million aggregate principal amount then outstanding of our 1.250% senior notes due 2017 upon maturity.

In June 2017, Ventas Canada Finance Limited issued and sold C$275.0 million aggregate principal amount of 2.55% senior notes, Series D due 2023 at a price equal to 99.954% of par, for total proceeds of C$274.9 million before the agent fees and expenses. The notes were offered on a private placement basis in Canada. We used part of the proceeds to repay C$124.4 million on our unsecured term loan due 2019.


We may, from time to time, seek to retire or purchase our outstanding senior notes for cash or in exchange for equity securities in open market purchases, privately negotiated transactions or otherwise. Such repurchases or exchanges, if any, will depend on prevailing market conditions, our liquidity requirements, contractual restrictions, prospects for future access to capital and other factors. The amounts involved may be material.


The indentures governing our outstanding senior notes require us to comply with various financial and other restrictive covenants. See “NOTE 10—SENIOR NOTES PAYABLE AND OTHER DEBT” of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements included in Item 8 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K. We were in compliance with all of these covenants at December 31, 2017.2020.


Mortgage Loan ObligationsMortgages


At December 31, 20172020 and 2016,2019, our consolidated aggregate principal amount of mortgage debt outstanding was $1.3$2.1 billion and $1.7$2.0 billion, respectively, of which our share was $1.2$1.8 billion and $1.6 billion, respectively.for both years.

For the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016 and 2015, we repaid in full mortgage loans in the aggregate principal amounts of $411.4 million, $337.8 million and $461.9 million, respectively.


Under certain circumstances, contractual and legal restrictions, including those contained in the instruments governing our subsidiaries’ outstanding mortgage indebtedness, may restrict our ability to obtain cash from our subsidiaries for the purpose of meeting our debt service obligations, including our payment guarantees with respect to Ventas Realty’s and Ventas Canada Finance Limited’s senior notes.

See “NOTE 4—ACQUISITIONS OF REAL ESTATE PROPERTY” and “NOTE 10—SENIOR NOTES PAYABLE AND OTHER DEBT” of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements included in Item 8 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.


Derivatives and Hedging


In February 2016, we entered into a $200 million notional amountthe normal course of our business, interest rate swap with a maturity of August 3, 2020 that effectively converts LIBOR-based floatingfluctuations affect future cash flows under our variable rate debt obligations, loans receivable and marketable debt securities, and foreign currency exchange rate fluctuations affect our operating results. We follow established risk management policies and procedures, including the use of derivative instruments, to fixed rate debt, setting LIBOR at 1.132% throughmitigate the maturity dateimpact of the swap.these risks.

In July 2016, we entered into $225 million notional forward starting swaps that reduced our exposure to fluctuations in interest rates between July and the September issuance of 3.25% senior notes due 2026. On the issuance date, we realized a gain of $1.9 million from these swaps that is being recognized over the life of the notes using an effective interest method.

In January and February 2017, we entered into a total of $275 million of notional forward starting swaps with an effective date of April 3, 2017 that reduced our exposure to fluctuations in interest rates related to changes in rates between the trade dates of the swaps and the forecasted issuance of long-term debt. The rate on the notional amounts was locked at a weighted average rate of 2.33%. In March 2017, these swaps were terminated in conjunction with the issuance of the 3.850% senior notes due 2027, which resulted in a $0.8 million gain that is being recognized over the life of the notes using the effective interest method.

In March 2017, we entered into interest rate swaps totaling a notional amount of $400 million with a maturity of January 15, 2023, effectively converting fixed rate debt to three month LIBOR-based floating rate debt.  As a result, we will receive a fixed rate on the swap of 3.10% and will pay a floating rate equal to three month LIBOR plus a weighted average swap spread of 0.98%.

In June 2017, we entered into a total of $125 million of notional forward starting swaps with an effective date of January 15, 2018 and a maturity of January 15, 2028, that reduced our exposure to fluctuations in interest rates related to changes in rates between the trade dates of the swaps and the forecasted issuance of long-term debt. The rate on the notional amounts was locked at a weighted average rate of 2.1832%.

In December 2017, we entered into a total of $75 million of notional forward starting swaps with an effective date of February 15, 2018 and a maturity of February 15, 2028, that reduced our exposure to fluctuations in interest rates related to changes in rates between the trade dates of the swaps and the forecasted issuance of long-term debt.  The rate on the notional amounts was locked at a weighted average rate of 2.3705%


Dividends


During 2020, we declared four dividends totaling $2.1425 per share of our common stock, including a fourth quarter dividend of $0.45 per share. In order to continue to qualify as a REIT, we must make annual distributions to our stockholders of at least 90% of our REIT taxable income (excluding net capital gain). In addition, we will be subject to income tax at the regular corporate rate to the extent we distribute less than 100% of our REIT taxable income, including any net capital gains. In 2017, our Board of Directors declared dividends on our common stock aggregating $3.115 per share, which exceeds 100% of our 2017 estimated taxable income after the use of any net operating loss carryforwards. We paid the first three quarterly installments of our 2017 dividend of $0.775 per share during 2017. In December 2017, we declared the fourth quarter cash dividend on our common stock of $0.79 per share, which was paid in January 2018. We intend to pay dividends greater than 100% of our taxable income, after the use of any net operating loss carryforwards, for 2018.2021.


We expect that our cash flows will exceed our REIT taxable income due to depreciation and other non-cash deductions in computing REIT taxable income and that we will be able to satisfy the 90% distribution requirement. However, from time to time, we may not have sufficient cash on hand or other liquid assets to meet this requirement or we may decide to retain cash or distribute such greater amount as may be necessary to avoid income and excise taxation. If we do not have sufficient cash on hand or other liquid assets to enable us to satisfy the 90% distribution requirement, or if we desire to retain cash, we may borrow funds, issue additional equity securities, pay taxable stock dividends, if possible, distribute other property or securities or engage in a transaction intended to enable us to meet the REIT distribution requirements or any combination of the foregoing.


Capital Expenditures


The terms of our triple-net leases generally obligate our tenants to pay all capital expenditures necessary to maintain and improve our triple-net leased properties. However, from time to time, we may fund the capital expenditures for our triple-net leased properties through loans or advances to the tenant,tenants, which may increase the amount of rent payable with respect to the properties in certain cases. We may also fund capital expenditures for which we may become responsible upon expiration of our triple-net leases or in the event that our tenants are unable or unwilling to meet their obligations under those leases orleases. We also expect to fund capital expenditures related to our senior living operations and office operations reportable business segments.segments with the cash flows from the properties or through additional borrowings. We expect that these liquidity needs generally will be satisfied by a combination of the following: cash flows from operations, cash on hand, debt assumptions and financings (including secured financings), issuances of debt and equity securities, dispositions of assets (in whole or in part through joint venture arrangements with third parties) and borrowings under our revolving credit facilities.

65



To the extent that unanticipated capital expenditure needs arise or significant borrowings are required, our liquidity may be affected adversely. Our ability to borrow additional funds may be restricted in certain circumstances by the terms of the instruments governing our outstanding indebtedness.


We are party to certain agreements that obligate us to develop seniorssenior housing or healthcare properties funded through capital that we and, in certain circumstances, our joint venture partners provide. As of December 31, 2017,2020, we had 1413 properties under development pursuant to these agreements, including fourthree properties that are owned by unconsolidated real estate entities. In addition, from time to time, we engage in redevelopment projects with respect to our existing seniorssenior housing communities to maximize the value, increase NOI, maintain a market-competitive position, achieve property stabilization or change the primary use of the property.


Equity Offerings and Related Events


In March 2015, we replaced our previous shelf registration statement that was scheduledFrom time to expire in accordance with the SEC’s rules with a new universal shelf registration statement, rendering our previous ATM program inaccessible. In connection with our new universal shelf registration statement, we established a new ATM program pursuant to whichtime, we may sell from time to time, up to an aggregate of $1.0 billion of our common stock.

Forstock under an “at-the-market” equity offering program (“ATM program”). As of December 31, 2020, we have $755.5 million remaining under our existing ATM program. During the years ended December 31, 2020 and 2019, we sold 1.5 million and 2.7 million shares of our common stock under our ATM program for gross proceeds of $44.88 and $66.75 per share, respectively. During the year ended December 31, 2017,2018, we issued and sold 1.1 millionno shares of common stock under our ATM equity offering program for aggregate net proceeds of $73.9program.

In June 2019, we sold 12.7 million after sales agent commissions. As of December 31, 2017, approximately $155.6 millionshares of our common stock remained availableunder a registered public offering for sale under our ATM equity offering program.
Other

We receivedgross proceeds of $16.3 million and $20.4 million$62.75 per share. We used the majority of the net proceeds to fund our LGM Acquisition. See “Note 4 – Acquisitions of Real Estate Property” of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements included in Part II, Item 8 of this Annual Report for additional information regarding the years ended December 31, 2017 and 2016, respectively, from the exercises of outstanding stock options. Future proceeds from the exercises of stock options will be affected primarily by the future trading price of our common stock and the number of options outstanding. The number of options outstanding increased to 5.0 million as of December 31, 2017, from 3.8 million as of December 31, 2016. The weighted average exercise price was $58.57 as of December 31, 2017.LGM Acquisition.



Cash Flows


The following table sets forth our sources and uses of cash flows for the years ended December 31, 20172020 and 2016:
2019:
 
For the Years Ended
December 31,
 
Increase (Decrease)
to Cash
 2017 2016 $ %
 (Dollars in thousands)
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period$286,707
 $53,023
 $233,684
 nm
Net cash provided by operating activities1,442,180
 1,372,341
 69,839
 5.1%
Net cash used in investing activities(976,517) (1,234,643) 258,126
 20.9
Net cash (used in) provided by financing activities(671,327) 96,838
 (768,165) nm
Effect of foreign currency translation on cash and cash equivalents312
 (852) 1,164
 nm
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period$81,355
 $286,707
 (205,352) (71.6)
 For the Years Ended
December 31,
(Decrease) Increase
to Cash
 20202019$%
 (Dollars in thousands)
Cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash at beginning of year$146,102 $131,464 $14,638 11.1 %
Net cash provided by operating activities1,450,176 1,437,783 12,393 0.9 
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities154,295 (1,585,299)1,739,594 nm
Net cash (used in) provided by financing activities(1,300,021)160,674 (1,460,695)nm
Effect of foreign currency translation1,088 1,480 (392)(26.5)
Cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash at end of year$451,640 $146,102 305,538 nm


nm—not meaningful


Cash Flows from Operating Activities


Cash flows from operating activities increased $69.8$12.4 million during the year ended December 31, 20172020 over the same period in 20162019 primarily due primarily to investments made during 2016 and 2017,the up-front consideration received in connection with the Brookdale transaction, partially offset by dispositions during the same periods.lower NOI.


Cash Flows from Investing Activities


Cash used inflows from investing activities decreased $258.1 millionincreased $1.7 billion during 20172020 over 20162019 primarily due to decreased acquisition and investment inactivity together with increased proceeds from real estate property during 2017 and proceeds from the 2017 sale of 36 SNFs owned by us and operated by Kindred, partially offset by the $700.0 million term loan we provided in March 2017 to facilitate Ardent’s acquisition of LHP, increases in development project expenditures and investments in unconsolidated entities and decreased loan receivable payments received during 2017.dispositions.


66


Cash Flows from Financing Activities


Cash provided byflows from financing activities decreased $768.2 million$1.5 billion during 20172020 over 20162019 primarily due to increased debt repayments and decreased proceeds from the issuancelower issuances of common stock, decreased debt borrowings during 2017,2020, net of repayments, partially offset by increased senior note issuances and borrowings on our unsecured revolving credit facilitylower dividends paid to common stockholders during 2017 over 2016.2020.


Contractual Obligations


The following table summarizes the effect that minimum debt (which includes principal and interest payments) and other material noncancelable commitments are expected to have on our cash flow in future periods as of December 31, 2017:
2020:
Total 
Less than 1
year(3)
 
1 - 3 years(4)
 
3 - 5 years(5)
 
More than 5
years(6)
Total
Less than 1 year(3)
1 - 3 years(4)
3 - 5 years(5)
More than 5
years(6)
(In thousands) (In thousands)
Long-term debt obligations (1) (2)
$14,444,492
 $1,214,444
 $3,499,792
 $3,252,070
 $6,478,186
Long-term debt obligations (1) (2)
$15,107,176 $1,002,409 $3,475,813 $3,794,808 $6,834,146 
Operating obligations, including ground lease obligations738,508
 27,498
 47,159
 40,389
 623,462
Operating obligations, including ground lease obligations726,410 26,968 43,352 36,413 619,677 
Total$15,183,000
 $1,241,942
 $3,546,951
 $3,292,459
 $7,101,648
Total$15,833,586 $1,029,377 $3,519,165 $3,831,221 $7,453,823 


(1)
Amounts represent contractual amounts due, including interest.
(2)
Interest on variable rate debt was based on forward rates obtained as of December 31, 2017.
(3)
Includes $700.0 million outstanding principal amount of our 2.00% senior notes due 2018.
(4)
Includes $600.0 million outstanding principal amount of our 4.00% senior notes due 2019, $318.0 million outstanding principal amount of our 3.00% senior notes, series A due 2019, $500.0 million outstanding principal amount of our 2.700% senior notes due 2020, and $900.0 million of borrowings under our unsecured term loan due 2020.

(1)Amounts represent contractual amounts due, including interest.
(5)
Includes $535.8 million of borrowings outstanding on our unsecured revolving credit facility, $2.9 million of borrowings outstanding on our secured revolving construction credit facility, $700.0 million outstanding principal amount of our 4.750% senior notes due 2021, $600.0 million outstanding principal amount of our 4.25% senior notes due 2022, $500.0 million outstanding principal amount of our 3.250% senior notes due 2022 and $198.8 million outstanding principal amount of our 3.300% senior notes, Series C due 2022.
(6)
Includes $4.4 billion aggregate principal amount outstanding of our senior notes maturing between 2023 and 2045. $52.4 million aggregate principal amount outstanding of our 6.90% senior notes due 2037 are subject to repurchase, at the option of the holders, on October 1, 2027, and $23.0 million aggregate principal amount outstanding of our 6.59% senior notes due 2038 are subject to repurchase, at the option of the holders, on July 7 in each of 2018, 2023 and 2028.

(2)Interest on variable rate debt based on rates as of December 31, 2020.
(3)Includes $39.4 million of borrowings outstanding on our unsecured revolving credit facility and $235.7 million outstanding principal amount of our floating rate senior notes, Series F due 2021.
(4)Includes $154.1 million of borrowings outstanding on our secured revolving construction credit facility, $263.7 million outstanding principal amount of our 3.25% senior notes due 2022, $196.4 million outstanding principal amount of our 3.30% senior notes, Series C due 2022, $216.0 million outstanding principal amount of our 2.55% senior notes, Series D due 2023, $200.0 million of borrowings outstanding on our unsecured term loan due 2023, $400.0 million outstanding principal amount of our 3.125% senior notes due 2023, and $400.0 million outstanding principal amount of our 3.10% senior notes due 2023.
(5)Includes $400.0 million outstanding principal amount of our 3.50% senior notes due 2024, $400.0 million outstanding principal amount of our 3.75% senior notes due 2024, $471.3 million outstanding principal amount of our 2.80% senior notes, Series E due 2024, $196.4 million outstanding principal amount of our 4.125% senior notes, Series B due 2024, $392.8 million of borrowings outstanding on our unsecured term loan due 2025, $450.0 million outstanding principal amount of our 2.65% senior notes due 2025, and $600.0 million outstanding principal amount of our 3.50% senior notes due 2025.
(6)Includes $4.8 billion aggregate principal amount outstanding of our senior notes maturing between 2025 and 2049. $52.4 million aggregate principal amount outstanding of our 6.90% senior notes due 2037 are subject to repurchase, at the option of the holders, at par, on October 1, 2027, and $22.8 million aggregate principal amount outstanding of our 6.59% senior notes due 2038 are subject to repurchase, at the option of the holders, at par, on July 7 in each of 2023 and 2028.

As of December 31, 2017,2020, we had $16.8$6.1 million of unrecognized tax benefits that are excluded from the table above, as we are unable to make a reasonablereasonably reliable estimate of the period of cash settlement, if any, with the respective tax authority.


Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements


We own interests in certain unconsolidated entities as described in Note 7 – Investments in Unconsolidated Entities. Except in limited circumstances, our risk of loss is limited to our investment in the joint venture and any outstanding loans receivable. In addition, we have certain properties which serve as collateral for debt that is owed by a previous owner of certain of our facilities, as described under Note 10 – Senior Notes Payable and Other Debt to the Consolidated Financial Statements. Our risk of loss for these certain properties is limited to the outstanding debt balance plus penalties, if any. Further, we use financial derivative instruments to hedge interest rate and foreign currency exchange rate exposure. Finally, at December 31, 2020, we had $24.9 million outstanding letter of credit obligations. We have no other material off-balance sheet arrangements that we expect would materially affect our liquidity and capital resources except those described above under “Contractual Obligations.”

67


Guarantor and Issuer Financial Information

Ventas, Inc. has fully and unconditionally guaranteed the obligation to pay principal and interest with respect to the outstanding senior notes issued by our 100%-owned subsidiary, Ventas Realty, including the senior notes that were jointly issued with Ventas Capital Corporation. Ventas Capital Corporation is a direct, 100%-owned subsidiary of Ventas Realty that has no assets or operations, but was formed in 2002 solely to facilitate offerings of senior notes by a limited partnership. None of our other subsidiaries (excluding Ventas Realty and Ventas Capital Corporation) is obligated with respect to Ventas Realty’s outstanding senior notes.

Ventas, Inc. has also fully and unconditionally guaranteed the obligation to pay principal and interest with respect to the outstanding senior notes issued by our 100%-owned subsidiary Ventas Canada Finance Limited (“Ventas Canada”). None of our other subsidiaries is obligated with respect to Ventas Canada’s outstanding senior notes, all of which were issued on a private placement basis in Canada.

In connection with the acquisition of Nationwide Health Properties, Inc. (“NHP”), our 100%-owned subsidiary Nationwide Health Properties, LLC (“NHP LLC”), as successor to NHP, assumed the obligation to pay principal and interest with respect to the outstanding senior notes issued by NHP. Neither we nor any of our subsidiaries (other than NHP LLC) is obligated with respect to any of NHP LLC’s outstanding senior notes.

Under certain circumstances, contractual and legal restrictions, including those contained in the instruments governing our subsidiaries’ outstanding mortgage indebtedness, may restrict our ability to obtain cash from our subsidiaries for the purpose of meeting our debt service obligations, including our payment guarantees with respect to Ventas Realty’s and Ventas Canada’s senior notes.

The following summarizes our guarantor and issuer balance sheet and statement of income information as of December 31, 2020 and December 31, 2019 and for the years ended December 31, 2020, 2019 and 2018.

Balance Sheet Information
As of December 31, 2020
GuarantorIssuer
 (In thousands)
Assets  
Investment in and advances to affiliates$16,576,278 $2,727,931 
Total assets16,937,149 2,844,339 
Liabilities and equity  
Intercompany loans10,691,626 (4,532,350)
Total liabilities10,918,320 3,577,009 
Redeemable OP unitholder and noncontrolling interests89,669 — 
Total equity (deficit)5,929,161 (732,670)
Total liabilities and equity16,937,149 2,844,339 

68


Balance Sheet Information

As of December 31, 2019
GuarantorIssuer
 (In thousands)
Assets  
Investment in and advances to affiliates$15,774,897 $2,728,110 
Total assets15,875,910 2,838,270 
Liabilities and equity  
Intercompany loans8,789,600 (5,105,070)
Total liabilities9,133,733 3,363,067 
Redeemable OP unitholder and noncontrolling interests102,657 — 
Total equity (deficit)6,639,520 (524,797)
Total liabilities and equity15,875,910 2,838,270 

Statement of Income Information
For the Year Ended December 31, 2020
GuarantorIssuer
 (In thousands)
Equity earnings in affiliates$469,311 $— 
Total revenues474,392 143,259 
Income (loss) before unconsolidated entities, real estate dispositions, income taxes and noncontrolling interests440,210 (215,406)
Net income (loss)439,149 (202,845)
Net income (loss) attributable to common stockholders439,149 (202,845)

Statement of Income Information
For the Year Ended December 31, 2019
GuarantorIssuer
 (In thousands)
Equity earnings in affiliates$362,143 $— 
Total revenues366,243 142,754 
Income (loss) before unconsolidated entities, real estate dispositions, income taxes and noncontrolling interests432,020 (246,929)
Net income (loss)433,016 (246,841)
Net income (loss) attributable to common stockholders433,016 (246,841)

For the Year Ended December 31, 2018
GuarantorIssuer
 (In thousands)
Equity earnings in affiliates$308,764 $— 
Total revenues335,613 139,062 
Income (loss) before unconsolidated entities, real estate dispositions, income taxes and noncontrolling interests400,349 (269,557)
Net income (loss)409,467 (269,557)
Net income (loss) attributable to common stockholders409,467 (269,557)


69


ITEM 7A.    Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
The information set forth in Part II, Item 7 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K under “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations—Asset/Liability Management” is incorporated by reference into this Item 7A.



70


ITEM 8.    Financial Statements and Supplementary Data
Ventas, Inc.
Index to Consolidated Financial Statements and Financial Statement Schedules



Consolidated Balance Sheets as of December 31, 20172020 and 2016
2019
Consolidated Statements of Income for the years endedYears Ended December 31, 2017, 20162020, 2019 and 20152018
Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income for the years endedYears Ended December 31, 2017, 20162020, 2019 and 20152018
Consolidated Statements of Equity for the years endedYears Ended December 31, 2017, 20162020, 2019 and 20152018
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the years endedYears Ended December 31, 2017, 20162020, 2019 and 20152018
Schedule II — Valuation and Qualifying Accounts
Schedule III — Real Estate and Accumulated Depreciation

71



MANAGEMENT REPORT ON INTERNAL CONTROL OVER FINANCIAL REPORTING
Our management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting, as defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) under the Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. This system is designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of consolidated financial statements for external purposes in accordance with U.S. GAAP. Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting is not intended to provide absolute assurance that a misstatement of our financial statements would be prevented or detected.


Management, with the participation of the Company’s Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, conducted an assessment of the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting based on the criteria set forth in Internal Control - Integrated Framework (2013) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). Based on this assessment, management has concluded that our internal control over financial reporting was effective at the reasonable assurance level as of December 31, 2017.2020.

The effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 20172020 has been audited by KPMG LLP, an independent registered public accounting firm, as stated in their report included herein.










REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM


72


Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

To the stockholdersStockholders and boardBoard of directorsDirectors
Ventas, Inc.:


Opinion on the Consolidated Financial Statements

We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Ventas, Inc. and subsidiaries (the “Company”)Company) as of December 31, 20172020 and 2016,2019, the related consolidated statements of income, comprehensive income, equity, and cash flows for each of the years in the three‑yearthree-year period ended December 31, 2017,2020, and the related notes and financial statement schedules II, III and IV (collectively, the “consolidatedconsolidated financial statements”)statements). In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of the Company as of December 31, 20172020 and 2016,2019, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for each of the years in the three‑yearthree-year period ended December 31, 2017,2020, in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles.

We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (“PCAOB”)(PCAOB), the Company’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2017,2020, based on criteria established in Internal Control - Integrated Framework (2013) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission, and our report dated February 9, 201823, 2021 expressed an unqualified opinion on the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting.

Change in Accounting Principle

As discussed in Note 2 to the consolidated financial statements, the Company has changed its method of accounting for leases as of January 1, 2019 due to the adoption of Financial Accounting Standards Board’s Accounting Standards Codification (ASC) Topic 842, Leases.

Basis for Opinion

These consolidated financial statements are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these consolidated financial statements based on our audits. We are a public accounting firm registered with the PCAOB and are required to be independent with respect to the Company in accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.

We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the consolidated financial statements are free of material misstatement, whether due to error or fraud. Our audits included performing procedures to assess the risks of material misstatement of the consolidated financial statements, whether due to error or fraud, and performing procedures that respond to those risks. Such procedures included examining, on a test basis, evidence regarding the amounts and disclosures in the consolidated financial statements. Our audits also included evaluating the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the consolidated financial statements. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.


Critical Audit Matters

The critical audit matters communicated below are matters arising from the current period audit of the consolidated financial statements that were communicated or required to be communicated to the audit committee and that: (1) relate to accounts or disclosures that are material to the consolidated financial statements and (2) involved our especially challenging, subjective, or complex judgments. The communication of critical audit matters does not alter in any way our opinion on the consolidated financial statements, taken as a whole, and we are not, by communicating the critical audit matters below, providing separate opinions on the critical audit matters or on the accounts or disclosures to which they relate.

Probability of collection of substantially all triple-net rents

As discussed in Note 2 to the consolidated financial statements, the Company assesses the probability of collecting substantially all triple-net rents on a lease-by-lease basis. Whenever the results of that assessment, events, or
73


changes in circumstances indicate that it is not probable the Company will collect substantially all triple-net rents under the lease, the Company records a charge to rental income.

We identified the evaluation of the probability of collection of substantially all triple-net rents as a critical audit matter. Complex auditor judgment was required to evaluate the various inputs and assumptions to the collectability assessment, including the financial strength of the tenant and any guarantors, and the operating performance of the leased property.

The following are the primary procedures we performed to address this critical audit matter. We evaluated the design and tested the operating effectiveness of certain internal controls over the Company’s evaluation of the inputs and assumptions used in the collectability assessment. To assess the Company’s assumptions about the financial strength of certain tenants and guarantors and the operating performance of the related leased properties, we identified and evaluated the relevance, reliability, and sufficiency of the tenant, guarantor and property financial information; tenant guarantees; the existence of outstanding accounts receivable; and the remaining term of the lease. We compared the Company’s historical determinations to actual collections to assess the Company’s ability to accurately estimate probability of collections.

Impairment of real estate investments in the triple-net leased and senior living operations segments

As discussed in Notes 1, 2, and 5 to the consolidated financial statements, the Company periodically evaluates its long-lived assets, primarily consisting of investments in real estate, for impairment indicators. If indicators of impairment are present, the Company evaluates the carrying value of the related real estate investments in relation to the future undiscounted cash flows of the underlying operations. In performing this evaluation, the Company considers market conditions and current intentions with respect to holding or disposing of the asset and adjusts the net book value of real estate properties to fair value if the sum of the expected future undiscounted cash flows, including sales proceeds, is less than book value. During the year, impairment indicators arose for certain real estate properties. As a result, recoverability assessments were performed, estimated fair values were determined, and impairment losses were recognized for certain properties.

We identified the evaluation of real estate investments within the triple-net leased and senior living operations segments for impairment as a critical audit matter. Subjective auditor judgment was required in evaluating the Company’s determination of the future undiscounted cash flows and estimated fair values of properties where undiscounted cash flows were less than net book value. In particular, the undiscounted cash flows and fair value estimates were sensitive to significant assumptions, including capitalization rates, projected operating cash flows, and stabilization period. Additionally, subjective auditor judgment and specialized skills and knowledge were needed to evaluate comparable market transactions used by the Company to develop certain fair value estimates due to limited transactional volume.

The following are the primary procedures we performed to address this critical audit matter. We evaluated the design and tested the operating effectiveness of certain internal controls related to the impairment process. This included controls related to the Company’s impairment process and the significant assumptions and fair value estimates described above. To test certain of the Company’s undiscounted cash flow estimates, we evaluated the Company’s forecasts of projected operating cash flows by comparing actual results to the Company’s forecasts adjusted for current market trends. In addition, we involved valuation professionals with specialized skills and knowledge, who assisted in:

●    evaluating the Company’s significant assumptions by comparing the significant assumptions to publicly available market data, and

●    developing independent estimates of fair value for certain properties using comparable market transactions and discounted cash flows developed using the Company’s historical results and publicly available market data.

/s/ KPMG LLP


We have served as the Company’s auditor since 2014.2014.


Chicago, Illinois
February 9, 2018

23, 2021
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
74
ON INTERNAL CONTROL OVER FINANCIAL REPORTING



Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm


To the stockholdersStockholders and boardBoard of directors
Directors Ventas, Inc.:

Opinion on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting

We have audited Ventas, Inc. and subsidiaries’subsidiaries' (the “Company”)Company) internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2017,2020, based on criteria established in Internal Control - Integrated Framework (2013) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission. In our opinion, the Company maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2017,2020, based on criteria established in Internal Control - Integrated Framework (2013) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission.

We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (“PCAOB”)(PCAOB), the consolidated balance sheets of the Company as of December 31, 20172020 and 2016,2019, the related consolidated statements of income, comprehensive income, equity, and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2017,2020, and the related notes and financial statement schedules II, III and IV (collectively, the “consolidatedconsolidated financial statements”)statements), and our report dated February 9, 201823, 2021 expressed an unqualified opinion on those consolidated financial statements.

Basis for Opinion

The Company’s management is responsible for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, included in the accompanying Management Report on the Internal Control over Financial Reporting. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Company’s internal control over financial reporting based on our audit. We are a public accounting firm registered with the PCAOB and are required to be independent with respect to the Company in accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.

We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material respects. Our audit of internal control over financial reporting included obtaining an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, assessing the risk that a material weakness exists, and testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control based on the assessed risk. Our audit also included performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.

Definition and Limitations of Internal Control Over Financial Reporting

A company’s internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A company’s internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (1) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company; and (3) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the company’s assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.

Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that

controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.


/s/ KPMG LLP


Chicago, Illinois February 23, 2021
February 9, 2018
75




VENTAS, INC.
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

As of December 31,
20202019
 (In thousands, except per
share amounts)
Assets  
Real estate investments:  
Land and improvements$2,261,415 $2,285,648 
Buildings and improvements24,323,279 24,386,051 
Construction in progress265,748 461,815 
Acquired lease intangibles1,230,886 1,308,077 
Operating lease assets346,372 385,225 
28,427,700 28,826,816 
Accumulated depreciation and amortization(7,877,665)(7,092,243)
Net real estate property20,550,035 21,734,573 
Secured loans receivable and investments, net605,567 704,612 
Investments in unconsolidated real estate entities443,688 45,022 
Net real estate investments21,599,290 22,484,207 
Cash and cash equivalents413,327 106,363 
Escrow deposits and restricted cash38,313 39,739 
Goodwill1,051,650 1,051,161 
Assets held for sale9,608 85,527 
Deferred income tax assets, net9,987 47,495 
Other assets807,229 877,716 
Total assets$23,929,404 $24,692,208 
Liabilities and equity  
Liabilities:  
Senior notes payable and other debt$11,895,412 $12,158,773 
Accrued interest111,444 111,115 
Operating lease liabilities209,917 251,196 
Accounts payable and other liabilities1,133,066 1,145,939 
Liabilities related to assets held for sale3,246 5,224 
Deferred income tax liabilities62,638 200,831 
Total liabilities13,415,723 13,873,078 
Redeemable OP unitholder and noncontrolling interests235,490 273,678 
Commitments and contingencies00
Equity:  
Ventas stockholders’ equity:  
Preferred stock, $1.00 par value; 10,000 shares authorized, unissued
Common stock, $0.25 par value; 600,000 shares authorized, 374,609 and 372,811 shares issued at December 31, 2020 and 2019, respectively93,635 93,185 
Capital in excess of par value14,171,262 14,056,453 
Accumulated other comprehensive loss(54,354)(34,564)
Retained earnings (deficit)(4,030,376)(3,669,050)
Treasury stock, 0 and 2 shares at December 31, 2020 and 2019, respectively(132)
Total Ventas stockholders’ equity10,180,167 10,445,892 
Noncontrolling interests98,024 99,560 
Total equity10,278,191 10,545,452 
Total liabilities and equity$23,929,404 $24,692,208 
 As of December 31,
 2017 2016
 
(In thousands, except per
share amounts)
Assets   
Real estate investments:   
Land and improvements$2,147,621
 $2,089,591
Buildings and improvements22,177,088
 21,516,396
Construction in progress343,129
 210,599
Acquired lease intangibles1,537,995
 1,510,629
 26,205,833
 25,327,215
Accumulated depreciation and amortization(5,617,453) (4,932,461)
Net real estate property20,588,380
 20,394,754
Secured loans receivable and investments, net1,346,359
 702,021
Investments in unconsolidated real estate entities123,639
 95,921
Net real estate investments22,058,378
 21,192,696
Cash and cash equivalents81,355
 286,707
Escrow deposits and restricted cash106,898
 80,647
Goodwill1,034,641
 1,033,225
Assets held for sale100,324
 54,961
Other assets572,945
 518,364
Total assets$23,954,541
 $23,166,600
Liabilities and equity   
Liabilities:   
Senior notes payable and other debt$11,276,062
 $11,127,326
Accrued interest93,958
 83,762
Accounts payable and other liabilities1,182,552
 907,928
Liabilities related to assets held for sale61,202
 1,462
Deferred income taxes250,092
 316,641
Total liabilities12,863,866
 12,437,119
Redeemable OP unitholder and noncontrolling interests158,490
 200,728
Commitments and contingencies
 
Equity:   
Ventas stockholders’ equity:   
Preferred stock, $1.00 par value; 10,000 shares authorized, unissued
 
Common stock, $0.25 par value; 600,000 shares authorized, 356,187 and 354,125 shares issued at December 31, 2017 and 2016, respectively89,029
 88,514
Capital in excess of par value13,053,057
 12,917,002
Accumulated other comprehensive loss(35,120) (57,534)
Retained earnings (deficit)(2,240,698) (2,487,695)
Treasury stock, 1 share at December 31, 2017 and 2016, respectively(42) (47)
Total Ventas stockholders’ equity10,866,226
 10,460,240
Noncontrolling interests65,959
 68,513
Total equity10,932,185
 10,528,753
Total liabilities and equity$23,954,541
 $23,166,600

  See accompanying notes.

76


VENTAS, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME
For the Years Ended December 31,For the Years Ended December 31,
2017 2016 2015202020192018
(In thousands, except per share
amounts)
(In thousands, except per share
amounts)
Revenues     Revenues   
Rental income:     Rental income:   
Triple-net leased$840,131
 $845,834
 $779,801
Triple-net leased$695,265 $780,898 $737,796 
Office753,467
 630,342
 566,245
Office799,627 828,978 776,011 
1,593,598
 1,476,176
 1,346,046
1,494,892 1,609,876 1,513,807 
Resident fees and services1,843,232
 1,847,306
 1,811,255
Resident fees and services2,197,160 2,151,533 2,069,477 
Office building and other services revenue13,677
 21,070
 41,492
Office building and other services revenue15,191 11,156 13,416 
Income from loans and investments117,608
 98,094
 86,553
Income from loans and investments80,505 89,201 124,218 
Interest and other income6,034
 876
 1,052
Interest and other income7,609 10,984 24,892 
Total revenues3,574,149
 3,443,522
 3,286,398
Total revenues3,795,357 3,872,750 3,745,810 
Expenses     Expenses   
Interest448,196
 419,740
 367,114
Interest469,541 451,662 442,497 
Depreciation and amortization887,948
 898,924
 894,057
Depreciation and amortization1,109,763 1,045,620 919,639 
Property-level operating expenses:     Property-level operating expenses:
Senior living1,250,065
 1,242,978
 1,209,415
Senior living1,658,671 1,521,398 1,446,201 
Office233,007
 191,784
 174,225
Office256,612 260,249 243,679 
Triple-net leasedTriple-net leased22,160 26,561 
1,483,072
 1,434,762
 1,383,640
1,937,443 1,808,208 1,689,880 
Office building services costs3,391
 7,311
 26,565
Office building services costs2,315 2,319 1,418 
General, administrative and professional fees135,490
 126,875
 128,035
General, administrative and professional fees130,158 158,726 145,978 
Loss on extinguishment of debt, net754
 2,779
 14,411
Loss on extinguishment of debt, net10,791 41,900 58,254 
Merger-related expenses and deal costs10,535
 24,635
 102,944
Merger-related expenses and deal costs29,812 15,235 30,547 
Allowance on loans receivable and investmentsAllowance on loans receivable and investments24,238 
Other20,052
 9,988
 17,957
Other707 (10,339)72,772 
Total expenses2,989,438
 2,925,014
 2,934,723
Total expenses3,714,768 3,513,331 3,360,985 
Income before unconsolidated entities, income taxes, discontinued operations, real estate dispositions and noncontrolling interests584,711
 518,508
 351,675
(Loss) income from unconsolidated entities(561) 4,358
 (1,420)
Income before unconsolidated entities, real estate dispositions, income taxes, discontinued operations and noncontrolling interestsIncome before unconsolidated entities, real estate dispositions, income taxes, discontinued operations and noncontrolling interests80,589 359,419 384,825 
Income (loss) from unconsolidated entitiesIncome (loss) from unconsolidated entities1,844 (2,454)(55,034)
Gain on real estate dispositionsGain on real estate dispositions262,218 26,022 46,247 
Income tax benefit59,799
 31,343
 39,284
Income tax benefit96,534 56,310 39,953 
Income from continuing operations643,949
 554,209
 389,539
Income from continuing operations441,185 439,297 415,991 
Discontinued operations(110) (922) 11,103
Discontinued operations(10)
Gain on real estate dispositions717,273
 98,203
 18,580
Net income1,361,112
 651,490
 419,222
Net income441,185 439,297 415,981 
Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests4,642
 2,259
 1,379
Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests2,036 6,281 6,514 
Net income attributable to common stockholders$1,356,470
 $649,231
 $417,843
Net income attributable to common stockholders$439,149 $433,016 $409,467 
Earnings per common share     Earnings per common share   
Basic:     Basic:   
Income from continuing operations$1.81
 $1.61
 $1.18
Income from continuing operations$1.18 $1.20 $1.17 
Net income attributable to common stockholders3.82
 1.88
 1.26
Net income attributable to common stockholders1.18 1.18 1.15 
Diluted:     Diluted:
Income from continuing operations$1.80
 $1.59
 $1.17
Income from continuing operations$1.17 $1.19 $1.16 
Net income attributable to common stockholders3.78
 1.86
 1.25
Net income attributable to common stockholders1.17 1.17 1.14 
Weighted average shares used in computing earnings per common share:     
Basic355,326
 344,703
 330,311
Diluted358,566
 348,390
 334,007

  See accompanying notes.

77


VENTAS, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME
For the Years Ended December 31,
202020192018
 (In thousands)
Net income$441,185 $439,297 $415,981 
Other comprehensive (loss) income:   
Foreign currency translation3,254 5,729 (9,436)
Unrealized (loss) gain on available for sale securities(3,549)11,634 14,944 
Derivative instruments(17,918)(30,814)10,030 
Total other comprehensive (loss) income(18,213)(13,451)15,538 
Comprehensive income422,972 425,846 431,519 
Comprehensive income attributable to noncontrolling interests3,613 7,649 6,514 
Comprehensive income attributable to common stockholders$419,359 $418,197 $425,005 
 For the Years Ended December 31,
 2017 2016 2015
 (In thousands)
Net income$1,361,112
 $651,490
 $419,222
Other comprehensive income (loss):     
Foreign currency translation20,612
 (52,266) (14,792)
Unrealized loss on government-sponsored pooled loan investments(437) (310) (5,236)
Other2,239
 2,607
 (658)
Total other comprehensive income (loss)22,414
 (49,969) (20,686)
Comprehensive income1,383,526
 601,521
 398,536
Comprehensive income attributable to noncontrolling interests4,642
 2,259
 1,379
Comprehensive income attributable to common stockholders$1,378,884
 $599,262
 $397,157

See accompanying notes.

78


VENTAS, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF EQUITY
For the Years Ended December 31, 2017, 20162020, 2019 and 2015
2018
 
Common
Stock Par
Value
 
Capital in
Excess of
Par Value
 
Accumulated
Other
Comprehensive
Income (Loss)
 
Retained
Earnings
(Deficit)
 
Treasury
Stock
 
Total Ventas
Stockholders’
Equity
 
Non- controlling
Interests
 Total Equity
 (In thousands, except per share amounts)
Balance at January 1, 2015$74,656
 $10,119,306
 $13,121
 $(1,526,388) $(511) $8,680,184
 $74,213
 $8,754,397
Net income
 
 
 417,843
 
 417,843
 1,379
 419,222
Other comprehensive loss
 
 (20,686) 
 
 (20,686) 
 (20,686)
Acquisition-related activity7,103
 2,209,202
 
 
 
 2,216,305
 853
 2,217,158
Impact of CCP Spin-Off
 (1,247,356) 
 
 
 (1,247,356) (4,717) (1,252,073)
Net change in noncontrolling interests
 
 
 
 
 
 (12,530) (12,530)
Dividends to common stockholders—$3.04 per share
 
 
 (1,003,413) 
 (1,003,413) 
 (1,003,413)
Issuance of common stock1,797
 489,227
 
 
 
 491,024
 
 491,024
Issuance of common stock for stock plans23
 6,068
 
 
 5,945
 12,036
 
 12,036
Change in redeemable noncontrolling interests
 (374) 
 
 
 (374) 1,902
 1,528
Adjust redeemable OP unitholder interests to current fair value
 7,831
 
 
 
 7,831
 
 7,831
Redemption of OP units
 1,719
 
 
 
 1,719
 
 1,719
Grant of restricted stock, net of forfeitures
 17,215
 
 
 (8,001) 9,214
 
 9,214
Balance at December 31, 201583,579
 11,602,838
 (7,565) (2,111,958) (2,567) 9,564,327
 61,100
 9,625,427
Net income
 
 
 649,231
 
 649,231
 2,259
 651,490
Other comprehensive loss
 
 (49,969) 
 
 (49,969) 
 (49,969)
Impact of CCP Spin-Off
 640
 
 
 
 640
 
 640
Net change in noncontrolling interests
 (2,179) 
 
 
 (2,179) 19,008
 16,829
Dividends to common stockholders—$2.965 per share
 
 
 (1,024,968) 
 (1,024,968) 
 (1,024,968)
Issuance of common stock4,716
 1,281,947
 
 
 17
 1,286,680
 
 1,286,680
Issuance of common stock for stock plans99
 26,594
 
 
 2,572
 29,265
 
 29,265
Change in redeemable noncontrolling interests
 (1,714) 
 
 
 (1,714) (13,854) (15,568)
Adjust redeemable OP unitholder interests to current fair value
 (21,085) 
 
 
 (21,085) 
 (21,085)
Redemption of OP units92
 22,622
 
 
 1,098
 23,812
 
 23,812
Grant of restricted stock, net of forfeitures28
 7,339
 
 
 (1,167) 6,200
 
 6,200
Balance at December 31, 201688,514
 12,917,002
 (57,534) (2,487,695) (47) 10,460,240
 68,513
 10,528,753
Net income
 
 
 1,356,470
 
 1,356,470
 4,642
 1,361,112
Other comprehensive income
 
 22,414
 
 
 22,414
 
 22,414
Impact of CCP Spin-Off
 107
 
 
 
 107
 
 107
Net change in noncontrolling interests
 (1,427) 
 
 
 (1,427) (13,292) (14,719)
Dividends to common stockholders—$3.115 per share
 
 
 (1,109,473) 
 (1,109,473) 
 (1,109,473)
Issuance of common stock276
 72,618
 
 
 553
 73,447
 
 73,447
Issuance of common stock for stock plans87
 21,723
 
 
 796
 22,606
 
 22,606
Change in redeemable noncontrolling interests
 (850) 
 
 
 (850) 6,096
 5,246
Adjust redeemable OP unitholder interests to current fair value
 253
 
 
 
 253
 
 253
Redemption of OP units84
 19,845
 
 
 3,207
 23,136
 
 23,136
Grant of restricted stock, net of forfeitures68
 23,786
 
 
 (4,551) 19,303
 
 19,303
Balance at December 31, 2017$89,029
 $13,053,057
 $(35,120) $(2,240,698) $(42) $10,866,226
 $65,959
 $10,932,185
Common
Stock Par
Value
Capital in
Excess of
Par Value
Accumulated Other Comprehensive LossRetained
Earnings
(Deficit)
Treasury
Stock
Total Ventas
Stockholders’
Equity
Non- controlling
Interests
Total Equity
 (In thousands, except per share amounts)
Balance at January 1, 2018$89,029 $13,053,057 $(35,120)$(2,240,698)$(42)$10,866,226 $65,959 $10,932,185 
Net income— — — 409,467 — 409,467 6,514 415,981 
Other comprehensive income— — 15,538 — — 15,538 — 15,538 
Net change in noncontrolling interests— (7,470)— — — (7,470)(16,736)(24,206)
Dividends to common stockholders—$3.1625 per share— — — (1,129,626)— (1,129,626)— (1,129,626)
Issuance of common stock for stock plans, restricted stock grants and other93 34,647 — — (210)34,530 — 34,530 
Adjust redeemable OP unitholder interests to current fair value— (3,323)— — — (3,323)— (3,323)
Redemption of OP Units(383)— — 252 (128)— (128)
Cumulative effect of change in accounting principles— — — 30,643 — 30,643 — 30,643 
Balance at December 31, 201889,125 13,076,528 (19,582)(2,930,214)— 10,215,857 55,737 10,271,594 
Net income— — — 433,016 — 433,016 6,281 439,297 
Other comprehensive (loss) income— — (14,819)— — (14,819)1,368 (13,451)
Net change in noncontrolling interests— (12,332)— — — (12,332)36,174 23,842 
Dividends to common stockholders—$3.17 per share— — — (1,172,653)— (1,172,653)— (1,172,653)
Issuance of common stock3,829 938,509 — — — 942,338 — 942,338 
Issuance of common stock for stock plans, restricted stock grants and other230 61,875 — — (132)61,973 — 61,973 
Adjust redeemable OP unitholder interests to current fair value— (7,388)— — — (7,388)— (7,388)
Redemption of OP Units(739)— — — (738)— (738)
Cumulative effect of change in accounting principle— — (163)801 — 638 — 638 
Balance at December 31, 201993,185 14,056,453 (34,564)(3,669,050)(132)10,445,892 99,560 10,545,452 
Net income— — — 439,149 — 439,149 2,036 441,185 
Other comprehensive (loss) income— — (19,790)— — (19,790)1,577 (18,213)
Net change in noncontrolling interests— 8,227 — — — 8,227 (5,149)3,078 
Dividends to common stockholders—$2.1425 per share— — — (800,475)— (800,475)— (800,475)
Issuance of common stock371 65,640 — — — 66,011 — 66,011 
Issuance of common stock for stock plans, restricted stock grants and other79 22,568 — — 132 22,779 — 22,779 
Adjust redeemable OP unitholder interests to current fair value— 18,638 — — — 18,638 — 18,638 
Redemption of OP Units— (264)— — — (264)— (264)
Balance at December 31, 2020$93,635 $14,171,262 $(54,354)$(4,030,376)$$10,180,167 $98,024 $10,278,191 

   See accompanying notes.

79


VENTAS, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

For the Years Ended December 31,
202020192018
 (In thousands)
Cash flows from operating activities:   
Net income$441,185 $439,297 $415,981 
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities:   
Depreciation and amortization1,109,763 1,045,620 919,639 
Amortization of deferred revenue and lease intangibles, net(40,856)(7,967)(30,660)
Other non-cash amortization20,719 22,985 18,886 
Allowance on loans receivable and investments24,238 
Stock-based compensation21,487 33,923 29,963 
Straight-lining of rental income103,082 (30,073)13,396 
Loss on extinguishment of debt, net10,791 41,900 58,254 
Gain on real estate dispositions(262,218)(26,022)(46,247)
Gain on real estate loan investments(167)(13,202)
Income tax benefit(101,985)(58,918)(43,026)
(Income) loss from unconsolidated entities(1,832)2,464 55,034 
Distributions from unconsolidated entities4,920 1,600 2,934 
Real estate impairments related to natural disasters52,510 
Other(779)13,264 3,720 
Changes in operating assets and liabilities:
Increase in other assets(68,233)(76,693)(23,198)
Increase in accrued interest276 9,737 4,992 
Increase (decrease) in accounts payable and other liabilities189,785 26,666 (37,509)
Net cash provided by operating activities1,450,176 1,437,783 1,381,467 
Cash flows from investing activities:   
Net investment in real estate property(78,648)(958,125)(265,907)
Investment in loans receivable(115,163)(1,258,187)(229,534)
Proceeds from real estate disposals1,044,357 147,855 353,792 
Proceeds from loans receivable119,011 1,017,309 911,540 
Development project expenditures(380,413)(403,923)(330,876)
Capital expenditures(148,234)(156,724)(131,858)
Distributions from unconsolidated entities172 57,455 
Investment in unconsolidated entities(286,822)(3,855)(47,007)
Insurance proceeds for property damage claims207 30,179 6,891 
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities154,295 (1,585,299)324,496 
Cash flows from financing activities:   
Net change in borrowings under revolving credit facilities(88,868)(569,891)321,463 
Net change in borrowings under commercial paper program(565,524)565,524 
Proceeds from debt733,298 3,013,191 2,549,473 
Repayment of debt(479,539)(2,623,916)(3,465,579)
Purchase of noncontrolling interests(8,239)(4,724)
Payment of deferred financing costs(8,379)(21,403)(20,612)
Issuance of common stock, net55,362 942,085 
Cash distribution to common stockholders(928,809)(1,157,720)(1,127,143)
Cash distribution to redeemable OP unitholders(7,283)(9,218)(7,459)
Cash issued for redemption of OP Units(575)(2,203)(1,370)
Contributions from noncontrolling interests1,314 6,282 1,883 
Distributions to noncontrolling interests(12,946)(9,717)(11,574)
Proceeds from stock option exercises15,103 36,179 8,762 
Other(4,936)(8,519)(5,057)
Net cash (used in) provided by financing activities(1,300,021)160,674 (1,761,937)
Net increase (decrease) in cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash304,450 13,158 (55,974)
Effect of foreign currency translation1,088 1,480 (815)
Cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash at beginning of year146,102 131,464 188,253 
Cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash at end of year$451,640 $146,102 $131,464 
80


 For the Years Ended December 31,
 2017 2016 2015
 (In thousands)
Cash flows from operating activities:     
Net income$1,361,112
 $651,490
 $419,222
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities:     
Depreciation and amortization (including amounts in discontinued operations)887,948
 898,924
 973,663
Amortization of deferred revenue and lease intangibles, net(20,537) (20,336) (24,129)
Other non-cash amortization16,058
 10,357
 5,448
Stock-based compensation26,543
 20,958
 19,537
Straight-lining of rental income, net(23,134) (27,988) (33,792)
Loss on extinguishment of debt, net754
 2,779
 14,411
Gain on real estate dispositions(717,273) (98,203) (18,811)
Gain on real estate loan investments(124) (2,271) 
Gain on sale of marketable securities
 
 (5,800)
Income tax benefit(63,599) (34,227) (42,384)
Loss (income) from unconsolidated entities3,588
 (4,358) 1,244
(Gain) loss on re-measurement of equity interests upon acquisition, net(3,027) 
 176
Distributions from unconsolidated entities4,676
 7,598
 23,462
Other9,240
 (1,847) 6,517
Changes in operating assets and liabilities:     
(Increase) decrease in other assets(15,854) 5,560
 42,316
Increase in accrued interest11,068
 2,604
 19,995
Decrease in accounts payable and other liabilities(35,259) (38,699) (2,244)
Net cash provided by operating activities1,442,180
 1,372,341
 1,398,831
Cash flows from investing activities:     
Net investment in real estate property(380,232) (1,429,112) (2,650,788)
Investment in loans receivable and other(748,119) (158,635) (171,144)
Proceeds from real estate disposals537,431
 300,561
 492,408
Proceeds from loans receivable101,097
 320,082
 109,176
Proceeds from sale or maturity of marketable securities
 
 76,800
Funds held in escrow for future development expenditures
 
 4,003
Development project expenditures(299,085) (143,647) (119,674)
Capital expenditures(132,558) (117,456) (107,487)
Distributions from unconsolidated entities6,169
 
 
Investment in unconsolidated entities(61,220) (6,436) (56,986)
Net cash used in investing activities(976,517) (1,234,643) (2,423,692)
Cash flows from financing activities:     
Net change in borrowings under revolving credit facilities384,783
 (35,637) (723,457)
Net cash impact of CCP Spin-Off
 
 (128,749)
Proceeds from debt1,111,649
 893,218
 2,512,747
Proceeds from debt related to CCP Spin-Off
 
 1,400,000
Repayment of debt(1,369,084) (1,022,113) (1,435,596)
Purchase of noncontrolling interests(15,809) (2,846) (3,819)
Payment of deferred financing costs(27,297) (6,555) (24,665)
Issuance of common stock, net73,596
 1,286,680
 491,023
Cash distribution to common stockholders(827,285) (1,024,968) (1,003,413)
Cash distribution to redeemable OP unitholders(5,677) (8,640) (15,095)
Purchases of redeemable OP units
 
 (33,188)
Contributions from noncontrolling interests4,402
 7,326
 
Distributions to noncontrolling interests(11,187) (6,879) (12,649)
Other10,582
 17,252
 (81)
Net cash (used in) provided by financing activities(671,327) 96,838
 1,023,058
Net (decrease) increase in cash and cash equivalents(205,664) 234,536
 (1,803)
Effect of foreign currency translation on cash and cash equivalents312
 (852) (522)
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period286,707
 53,023
 55,348
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period$81,355
 $286,707
 $53,023

VENTAS, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS (Continued)
For the Years Ended December 31,
202020192018
(In thousands)
Supplemental disclosure of cash flow information:   
Interest paid including payments and receipts for derivative instruments$429,636 $410,854 $406,907 
Supplemental schedule of non-cash activities:   
Assets acquired and liabilities assumed from acquisitions and other:   
Real estate investments$170,484 $1,057,138 $94,280 
Other assets1,224 11,140 5,398 
Debt55,368 907,746 30,508 
Other liabilities2,707 47,121 18,086 
Deferred income tax liability337 95 922 
Noncontrolling interests20,259 113,316 2,591 
Equity issued30,487 
Equity issued for redemption of OP Units127 907 
 For the Years Ended December 31,
 2017 2016 2015
 (In thousands)
Supplemental disclosure of cash flow information:     
Interest paid including swap payments and receipts$409,890
 $395,138
 $391,699
Supplemental schedule of non-cash activities:     
Assets acquired and liabilities assumed from acquisitions:     
Real estate investments$425,906
 $69,092
 $2,565,960
Utilization of funds held for an Internal Revenue Code Section 1031 exchange(286,748) (6,954) (8,911)
Other assets(3,716) 90,037
 20,090
Debt75,231
 47,641
 177,857
Other liabilities70,878
 72,636
 54,459
Deferred income tax liability(14,869) 9,381
 52,153
Noncontrolling interests4,202
 22,517
 88,085
Equity issued
 
 2,204,585
Non-cash impact of CCP Spin-Off
 
 1,256,404
Equity issued for redemption of OP Units and Class C Units24,002
 24,318
 

See accompanying notes.
81

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS





NOTE 1—1–DESCRIPTION OF BUSINESS


Ventas, Inc. (together with its subsidiaries, unless otherwise indicated or except where the context otherwise requires, “we,” “us” or “our”), an S&P 500 company, is a real estate investment trust (“REIT”) operating at the intersection of healthcare and real estate, with a highly diversified portfolio of seniors housingsenior housing; life science, research and innovation; and healthcare propertiesproperties; which we generally refer to as “healthcare real estate,” located throughout the United States, Canada and the United Kingdom. As of December 31, 2017,2020, we owned more thanor managed through unconsolidated real estate entities approximately 1,200 properties (including properties owned through investments in unconsolidated entities and properties classified as held for sale),sale, consisting of seniorssenior housing communities, medical office buildings (“MOBs”), life science, research and innovation centers, inpatient rehabilitation facilities (“IRFs”) and long-term acute care facilities (“LTACs”), and health systems and skilled nursing facilities (“SNFs”), and we had 14 properties under development, including four properties that are owned by unconsolidated real estate entities.systems. Our company was originally founded in 1983 and is headquartered in Chicago, Illinois. Illinois with an additional office in Louisville, Kentucky.


We primarily invest in seniorsa diversified portfolio of healthcare real estate asset through wholly owned subsidiaries and other co-investment entities. We operate through three reportable business segments: triple-net leased properties, senior living operations, which we also refer to as SHOP, and office operations.See “Note 2 – Accounting Policies” and “Note 19 – Segment Information.”Our senior housing and healthcare properties through acquisitions and leaseare either operated under triple-net leases in our triple-net leased properties to unaffiliated tenantssegment or operate them through independent third-party managers. managers in our senior living operations segment.

As of December 31, 2017,2020, we leased a total of 546366 properties (excluding MOBs)properties within our office operations reportable business segment) to various healthcare operating companies under “triple-net” or “absolute-net” leases that obligate the tenants to pay all property-related expenses, including maintenance, utilities, repairs, taxes, insurance and capital expenditures.

As of December 31, 2017, pursuant to long-term management agreements, we engaged independent operators, such as Atria Senior Living, Inc. (“Atria”) and Sunrise Senior Living, LLC (together with its subsidiaries, “Sunrise”), to manage 297 seniors housing communities for us.

Our three3 largest tenants, Brookdale Senior Living Inc. (together with its subsidiaries, “Brookdale Senior Living”), Ardent Health Partners, LLC (together with its subsidiaries, “Ardent”) and Kindred Healthcare, Inc.LLC (together with its subsidiaries, “Kindred”) leased from us 135121 properties (excluding one property8 properties managed by Brookdale Senior Living pursuant to a long-term management agreement)agreements), 1012 properties and 3132 properties, (excluding one MOB included within our office operations reportable business segment), respectively, as of December 31, 2017.2020.


As of December 31, 2020, pursuant to long-term management agreements, we engaged independent managers, such as Atria Senior Living, Inc. (“Atria”) and Sunrise Senior Living, LLC (together with its subsidiaries, “Sunrise”), to manage the 441 senior housing communities in our senior living operations segment for us.

Through our Lillibridge Healthcare Services, Inc. subsidiary and our ownership interest in PMB Real Estate Services LLC, we also provide MOB management, leasing, marketing, facility development and advisory services to highly rated hospitals and health systems throughout the United States. In addition, from time to time, we make secured and non-mortgage loans and other investments relating to seniorssenior housing and healthcare operators or properties.


COVID-19 Update

During fiscal 2020 and continuing into fiscal 2021, the COVID-19 pandemic has negatively affected our businesses in a number of ways and is expected to continue to do so.

Operating Results.Our senior living operations segment was significantly impacted by the COVID-19 pandemic. Occupancy decreased over the course of 2020, while operating expenses increased as our senior living communities responded to the pandemic, resulting in a significant decline in NOI compared to 2019. Our NNN senior housing tenants’ performance was similarly affected by COVID-19. During the course of 2020, we modified certain NNN senior housing leases to reset rent and provided other modest financial accommodations to certain NNN senior housing tenants who needed it as a result of COVID-19. We also wrote-off previously accrued straight-line rental income related to NNN senior housing tenants due to COVID-19.

However, we benefited from our ongoing strategy of diversification, with our office and NNN healthcare businesses demonstrating resilience in the face of the pandemic. The Company’s NNN healthcare tenants benefited from significant government financial support that was deployed early and has partially offset the direct financial impact of the pandemic. Our office operations segment, which primarily serves MOB and research and innovation tenants that were less impacted by the pandemic, delivered steady performance throughout the year.

Provider Relief Grants.In August 2015,the third and fourth quarter of 2020, we completedapplied for grants under Phase 2 and Phase 3 of the spin-offProvider Relief Fund administered by the U.S. Department of mostHealth & Human Services (“HHS”) on behalf of the assisted living communities in our post-acute/skilled nursingsenior living operations segment to partially mitigate losses attributable to COVID-19. These grants
82


are intended to reimburse eligible providers for expenses incurred to prevent, prepare for and respond to COVID-19 and lost revenues attributable to COVID-19. Recipients are not required to repay distributions from the Provider Relief Fund, provided that they attest to and comply with certain terms and conditions. See “Government Regulation—Governmental Response to the COVID-19 Pandemic” in Part I, Item 1 of this Annual Report.

During the fourth quarter of 2020, we received $34.3 million and $0.8 million in grants in connection with our Phase 2 and Phase 3 applications, respectively, and recognized these grants within property-level operating expenses in our Consolidated Statements of Income. Subsequent to December 31, 2020, we received $13.6 million in grants in connection with our Phase 3 applications, which we expect to recognize in 2021. While we have received all amounts under our Phase 2 applications and have begun to receive amounts under our Phase 3 applications, there can be no assurance that our remaining applications will be approved or that additional funds will ultimately be received. Any grants that are ultimately received and retained by us are not expected to fully offset the losses incurred in our senior living operating portfolio that are attributable to COVID-19. Further, although we continue to monitor and evaluate the terms and conditions associated with the Provider Relief Fund distributions, we cannot assure you that we will be in compliance with all requirements related to the payments received under the Provider Relief Fund.

Capital Conservation Actions. In response to the COVID-19 pandemic, we took precautionary steps to increase liquidity and preserve financial flexibility in light of the resulting uncertainty.See “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations—Liquidity and Capital Resources; Recent Capital Conservation Actions.” As of February 16, 2021, we had approximately $3.0 billion in liquidity, including availability under our revolving credit facility portfolio into an independent, publicly traded REIT named Care Capital Properties, Inc. (“CCP”) (the “CCP Spin-Off”). and cash and cash equivalents on hand, with 0 borrowings outstanding under our commercial paper program and negligible near-term debt maturing.

Continuing Impact. The historicaltrajectory and future impact of the COVID-19 pandemic remains highly uncertain. The extent of the pandemic’s continuing and ultimate effect on our operational and financial performance will depend on a variety of factors, including the speed at which available vaccines can be successfully deployed; the rate of acceptance of available vaccines, particularly among the residents and staff in our senior housing communities; the impact of new variants of the virus and the effectiveness of available vaccines against those variants; ongoing clinical experience, which may differ considerably across regions and fluctuate over time; and on other future developments, including the ultimate duration, spread and intensity of the outbreak, the availability of testing, the extent to which governments impose, roll back or re-impose preventative restrictions and the availability of ongoing government financial support to our business, tenants and operators. Due to these uncertainties, we are not able at this time to estimate the ultimate impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on our business, results of operations, financial condition and cash flows.

We have not identified the COVID-19 pandemic, on its own, as a “triggering event” for purposes of the CCP properties are presented as discontinued operations in the accompanying Consolidated Financial Statements. See “NOTE 5—DISPOSITIONS.”

In September 2016, we completed the acquisitionevaluating impairment of substantially all of the university affiliated life science and innovation real estate assets, goodwill and other intangibles, investments in unconsolidated entities and financial instruments. However, as of Wexford Science & Technology, LLC (“Wexford”) from affiliatesDecember 31, 2020, we considered the effect of Blackstone Real Estate Partners VIII, L.P. (together with its affiliates, “Blackstone”) (the “Life Sciences Acquisition”).the pandemic on certain of our assets (described below) and our ability to recover the respective carrying values of these assets. We applied our considerations to existing critical accounting policies that require us to make estimates and assumptions regarding future events that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities. We based our estimates on our experience and on assumptions we believe to be reasonable under the circumstances. As a result, we renamedhave recognized the following charges for the year ended December 31, 2020:

Adjustment to rental income: As of December 31, 2020, we concluded that it is probable we will not collect substantially all rents from certain tenants, primarily within our MOBtriple-net leased properties segment. As a result, we recognized adjustments to rental income of $74.6 million for the year ended December 31, 2020. Rental payments from these tenants will be recognized in rental income when received.

Impairment of real estate assets: During 2020, we compared our estimate of undiscounted cash flows, including a hypothetical terminal value, for certain real estate assets to the assets’ respective carrying values. During 2020 we recognized $126.5 million of impairments representing the difference between the assets’ carrying value and the then-estimated fair value of $239.9 million. The impaired assets, primarily senior housing communities, represent approximately 1% of our consolidated net real estate property as of December 31, 2020. Impairments are recorded within depreciation and amortization in our Consolidated Statements of Income and are primarily related to our senior living operations reportable business segment “office operations,”segment.

Loss on financial instruments and impairment of unconsolidated entities: As of December 31, 2020, we concluded that credit losses exist within certain of our non-mortgage loans receivable and government-sponsored pooled loan investments. As a result, we recognized credit loss charges of $34.7 million for the year ended December 31, 2020 within allowance on loans receivable and investments in our Consolidated Statements of Income. During the fourth
83


quarter of 2020, we received $10.5 million as a principal payment on previously reserved loans. No allowances are recorded within our portfolios of secured mortgage loans or marketable debt securities. In addition, during 2020 we recognized an impairment of $10.7 million in an equity investment in an unconsolidated entity also recorded within allowance on loans receivable and investments in our Consolidated Statements of Income.

Deferred tax asset valuation allowance: During 2020, we concluded that it was not more likely than not that deferred tax assets (primarily US federal NOL carryforwards which now includes both MOBs and life science and innovation centers.begin to expire in 2032) would be realized based on our cumulative loss in recent years for certain of our taxable REIT subsidiaries. As a result, we recorded a valuation allowance of $56.4 million against these deferred tax assets on our Consolidated Balance Sheets with a corresponding charge to income tax benefit (expense) in our Consolidated Statements of Income. We maintained our conclusions regarding the realizability of deferred tax assets as of December 31, 2020.



NOTE 2—2–ACCOUNTING POLICIES

Principles of Consolidation

The accompanying Consolidated Financial Statements include our accounts and the accounts of our wholly owned subsidiaries and the joint venture entities over which we exercise control. All intercompany transactions and balances have been eliminated in consolidation, and our net earnings are reduced by the portion of net earnings attributable to noncontrolling interests.

U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (“GAAP”) requiresrequire us to identify entities for which control is achieved through means other than voting rights and to determine which business enterprise is the primary beneficiary of variable interest entities (“VIEs”). A VIE is broadly defined as an entity with one or more of the following characteristics: (a) the total equity investment at risk is insufficient to finance the entity’s activities without additional subordinated financial support; (b) as
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)


a group, the holders of the equity investment at risk lack (i) the ability to make decisions about the entity’s activities through voting or similar rights, (ii) the obligation to absorb the expected losses of the entity, or (iii) the right to receive the expected residual returns of the entity; and (c) the equity investors have voting rights that are not proportional to their economic interests, and substantially all of the entity’s activities either involve, or are conducted on behalf of, an investor that has disproportionately few voting rights. We consolidate our investment in a VIE when we determine that we are its primary beneficiary. We may change our original assessment of a VIE upon subsequent events such as the modification of contractual arrangements that affects the characteristics or adequacy of the entity’s equity investments at risk and the disposition of all or a portion of an interest held by the primary beneficiary.

We identify the primary beneficiary of a VIE as the enterprise that has both: (i) the power to direct the activities of the VIE that most significantly impact the entity’s economic performance;performance and (ii) the obligation to absorb losses or the right to receive benefits of the VIE that could be significant to the entity. We perform this analysis on an ongoing basis.

As it relates to investments in joint ventures, GAAP may preclude consolidation by the sole general partner in certain circumstances based on the type of rights held by the limited partner(s).partner or partners. We assess limited partners’ rights and their impact on our consolidation conclusions, and we reassess if there is a change to the terms or in the exercisability of the rights of the limited partners, the sole general partner increases or decreases its ownership of limited partnership (“LP”) interests or there is an increase or decrease in the number of outstanding limited partnershipLP interests. We also apply this guidance to managing member interests in limited liability companies.companies (“LLCs”).

We consolidate several VIEs that share the following common characteristics:


the VIE is in the legal form of an LP or LLC;
the VIE was designed to own and manage its underlying real estate investments;
we are the general partner or managing member of the VIE;
we own a majority of the voting interests in the VIE;
a minority of voting interests in the VIE are owned by external third parties, unrelated to us;
the minority owners do not have substantive kick-out or participating rights in the VIE; and
we are the primary beneficiary of the VIE.

We have separately identified certain special purpose entities that were established to allow investments in life scienceresearch and innovation projects by tax credit investors (“TCIs”). We have determined that these special purpose entities are VIEs, we are a holder of variable interests and that we are the primary beneficiary of the VIEs, and therefore we consolidate these special
84

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

purpose entities. Our primary beneficiary determination is based upon several factors, including but not limited to the rights we have in directing the activities which most significantly impact the VIEs’ economic performance as well as certain guarantees which protect the TCIs from losses should a tax credit recapture event occur.

In general, the assets of the consolidated VIEs are available only for the settlement of the obligations of the respective entities. Unless otherwise required by the LP or LLC agreement, any mortgage loans of the consolidated VIEs are non-recourse to us. The table below summarizes the total assets and liabilities of our consolidated VIEs as reported on our Consolidated Balance Sheets.Sheets:
December 31, 2020December 31, 2019
Total AssetsTotal LiabilitiesTotal AssetsTotal Liabilities
(In thousands)
NHP/PMB L.P.$649,128 $238,168 $666,404 $244,934 
Other identified VIEs4,095,102 1,653,036 4,075,821 1,459,830 
Tax credit VIEs614,490 204,746 845,229 333,809 
  December 31, 2017 December 31, 2016
  Total Assets Total Liabilities Total Assets Total Liabilities
  (In thousands)
NHP/PMB L.P. $605,150
 $199,958
 $639,763
 $199,674
Ventas Realty Capital Healthcare Trust Operating Partnership, L.P. 
 
 2,143,139
 162,426
Other identified VIEs 1,983,124
 349,961
 1,882,336
 354,034
Tax credit VIEs 988,598
 221,908
 981,752
 234,109

Investments in Unconsolidated Entities

We report investments in unconsolidated entities over whose operating and financial policies we have the ability to exercise significant influence under the equity method of accounting. Under this method of accounting, our share of the investee’s earnings or losses is included in our Consolidated Statements of Income.

We base the initial carrying value of investments in unconsolidated entities on the fair value of the assets at the time we acquired the joint venture interest. We estimate fair values for our equity method investments based on discounted cash flow
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)


models that include all estimated cash inflows and outflows over a specified holding period and, where applicable, any estimated debt premiums or discounts. The capitalization rates, discount rates and credit spreads we use in these models are based upon assumptions that we believe to be within a reasonable range of current market rates for the respective investments.

We generally amortize any difference between our cost basis and the basis reflected at the joint venture level, if any, over the lives of the related assets and liabilities and include that amortization in our share of income or loss from unconsolidated entities. For earnings of equity method investments with pro rata distribution allocations, net income or loss is allocated between the partners in the joint venture based on their respective stated ownership percentages. In other instances, net income or loss ismay be allocated between the partners in the joint venture based on the hypothetical liquidation at book value method (the “HLBV method”). Under the HLBV method, net income or loss is allocated between the partners based on the difference between each partner’s claim on the net assets of the joint venture at the end and beginning of the period, after taking into account contributions and distributions. Each partner’s share of the net assets of the joint venture is calculated as the amount that the partner would receive if the joint venture were to liquidate all of its assets at net book value and distribute the resulting cash to creditors and partners in accordance with their respective priorities. Under thisthe HLBV method, in any given period, we could record more or less income than the joint venture has generated, than actual cash distributions receivedwe receive or than the amount we may receive in the event of an actual liquidation.

Redeemable OP Unitholder and Noncontrolling Interests

We own a majority interest in NHP/PMB L.P. (“NHP/PMB”), a limited partnership formed in 2008 to acquire properties from entities affiliated with Pacific Medical Buildings LLC. We consolidate NHP/PMB, asLLC (“PMB”). Given our wholly owned subsidiary is the general partner and the primary beneficiary of thisNHP/PMB, we consolidate it as a VIE. As of December 31, 2017, third party2020, third-party investors owned 2.73.3 million Class A limited partnership units in NHP/PMB (“OP Units”), which represented 27.2%31% of the total units then outstanding, and we owned 7.27.3 million Class B limited partnership units in NHP/PMB, representing the remaining 72.8%69%. At any time following the first anniversary of the date of their issuance, the OP Units may be redeemed at the election of the holder for cash or, at our option, 0.9051 shares of our common stock per OP Unit, subject to further adjustment in certain circumstances. We are party by assumption to a registration rights agreement with the holders of the OP Units that requires us, subject to the terms and conditions and certain exceptions set forth therein, to file and maintain a registration statement relating to the issuance of shares of our common stock upon redemption of OP Units.
Prior to January 2017, we owned a majority interest in Ventas Realty Capital Healthcare Trust Operating Partnership, L.P. (“Ventas Realty OP”) and we consolidated this entity, as our wholly owned subsidiary is the general partner, and was the primary beneficiary of this VIE. In January 2017, third party investors redeemed the remaining 341,776 limited partnership units (“Class C Units”) outstanding for 341,776 shares of Ventas common stock, valued at $20.9 million. After giving effect to such redemptions, Ventas Realty OP is our wholly owned subsidiary.
As redemption rights are outside of our control, the redeemable OP Units and Class C Units (together, the “OP Unitholder Interests”) are classified outside of permanent equity on our Consolidated Balance Sheets. We reflect the redeemable OP Unitholder InterestsUnits at the greater of cost or fairredemption value. As of December 31, 20172020 and 2016,2019, the fair value of the redeemable OP Unitholder InterestsUnits was $146.3$146.0 million and $177.2$171.2 million, respectively.
85

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

We recognize changes in fair value through capital in excess of par value, net of cash distributions paid and purchases by us of any OP Unitholder Interests.Units. Our diluted earnings per share (“EPS”) includes the effect of any potential shares outstanding from redemption of the OP Unitholder Interests.Units.

Certain noncontrolling interests of other consolidated joint ventures were also classified as redeemable at December 31, 20172020 and 2016.2019. Accordingly, we record the carrying amount of these noncontrolling interests at the greater of their initial carrying amount (increased or decreased for the noncontrolling interests’ share of net income or loss and distributions) or the redemption value. Our joint venture partners have certain redemption rights with respect to their noncontrolling interests in these joint ventures that are outside of our control, and the redeemable noncontrolling interests are classified outside of permanent equity on our Consolidated Balance Sheets. We recognize changes in the carrying value of redeemable noncontrolling interests through capital in excess of par value.

Noncontrolling Interests

Excluding the redeemable noncontrolling interests described above, we present the portion of any equity that we do not own in entities that we control (and thus consolidate) as noncontrolling interests and classify those interests as a component of consolidated equity, separate from total Ventas stockholders’ equity, on our Consolidated Balance Sheets. For consolidated joint ventures with pro rata distribution allocations, net income or loss, and comprehensive income, is allocated between the joint venture partners based on their respective stated ownership percentages. In other cases, net income or loss is allocated between the joint venture partners based on the HLBV method. We account for purchases or sales of equity interests that do not result in a change of control as equity transactions, through capital in excess of par value. In addition, weWe include net income attributable to the noncontrolling interests in net income in our Consolidated Statements of Income and we include the noncontrolling interests share of comprehensive income in our Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)



Accounting for Historic and New Markets Tax Credits

For certain of our life scienceresearch and innovation centers, we are party to certain contractual arrangements with TCIs that were established to enable the TCIs to receive benefits of historic tax credits (“HTCs”) and/or, new marketmarkets tax credits (“NMTCs”)., or both. As of December 31, 2017,2020, we own 11owned 8 properties that had syndicated HTCs or NMTCs, or both, to TCIs.

In general, capital contributions are made by TCIs invest cash into special purpose entities that invest in entities that own the subject property and generate the tax credits. The TCIs receive substantially all of the tax credits and hold only a noncontrollingnominal interest in the economic risk and benefits of the special purpose entities.

HTCs are delivered to the TCIs upon substantial completion of the project. NMTCs are allowed for up to 39% of a qualified investment and are delivered to the TCIs after the investment has been funded and spent on a qualified business. HTCs are subject to 20% recapture per year beginning one year after the completion of the historic rehabilitation of the subject property. NMTCs are subject to 100% recapture until the end of the seventh year following the qualifying investment. We have provided the TCIs with certain guarantees which protect the TCIs from losses should a tax credit recapture event occur. The contractual arrangements with the TCIs include a put/call provision whereby we may be obligated or entitled to repurchase the ownership interest of the TCIs in the special purpose entities at the end of the tax credit recapture period. We anticipate that either the TCIs will exercise their put rights or we will exercise our call rights prior to the applicable tax credit recapture periods.

The portion of the TCI’s capital contributioninvestment that is attributed to the put is recorded at fair value at inception in accounts payable and other liabilities on our Consolidated Balance Sheets, and is accreted to the expected put price as interest expense in our Consolidated Statements of Income over the recapture period. The remaining balance of the TCI’s capital contributioninvestment is initially recorded in accounts payable and other liabilities on our Consolidated Balance Sheets and will be relieved upon delivery of the tax credit to the TCI, as a reduction in the carrying value of the subject property, net of allocated expenses. Direct and incremental costs incurred in structuring the transaction are deferred and will be recognized as an increase in the cost basis of the subject property upon the recognition of the related tax credit as discussed above.

Accounting Estimates

The preparation of financial statements in accordance with GAAP requires us to make estimates and assumptions regarding future events that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities, the disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates.

86

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

Accounting for Real Estate Acquisitions
On January 1, 2017,
When we adopted Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) 2017-01, Clarifying the Definition of a Business (“ASU 2017-01”) which narrows the Financial Accounting Standards Board’s (“FASB”) definition of a business and provides a framework that gives entities a basis for makingacquire real estate, we first make reasonable judgments about whether athe transaction involves an asset or a business. ASU 2017-01 states that whenOur real estate acquisitions are generally accounted for as asset acquisitions as substantially all of the fair value of the gross assets acquired is concentrated in a single identifiable asset or group of similar identifiable assets, the acquired asset is not a business. If this initial test is not met, an acquired asset cannot be considered a business unless it includes an input and a substantive process that together significantly contribute to the ability to create output. The primary differences between business combinations and asset acquisitions include recognition of goodwill at the acquisition date and expense recognition for transaction costs as incurred. We are applying ASU 2017-01 prospectively for acquisitions after January 1, 2017.
assets. Regardless of whether an acquisition is considered a business combination or an asset acquisition, we record the cost of the businesses or assets acquired as tangible and intangible assets and liabilities based upon their estimated fair values as of the acquisition date. Intangibles primarily include the value of in-place leases and acquired lease contracts.

We estimate the fair value of buildings acquired on an as-if-vacant basis or replacement cost basis and depreciate the building value over the estimated remaining life of the building, generally not to exceed 35 years. We determine the fair value of other fixed assets, such as site improvements and furniture, fixtures and equipment, based upon the replacement cost and depreciate such value over the assets’ estimated remaining useful lives as determined at the applicable acquisition date. We determine the value of land either by considering the sales prices of similar properties in recent transactions or based on internal analyses of recently acquired and existing comparable properties within our portfolio. We generally determine the value of construction in progress based upon the replacement cost. However, for certain acquired properties that are part of a ground-up development, we determine fair value by using the same valuation approach as for all other properties and deducting the estimated cost to complete the development. During the remaining construction period, we capitalize project costs until the
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)


development has reached substantial completion. Construction in progress, including capitalized interest, is not depreciated until the development has reached substantial completion.

Intangibles primarily include the value of in-place leases and acquired lease contracts. We include all lease-related intangible assets and liabilities within acquired lease intangibles and accounts payable and other liabilities, respectively, on our Consolidated Balance Sheets.

The fair value of acquired lease-related intangibles, if any, reflects: (i) the estimated value of any above and/or below market leases, determined by discounting the difference between the estimated market rent and in-place lease rent; and (ii) the estimated value of in-place leases related to the cost to obtain tenants, including leasing commissions, and an estimated value of the absorption period to reflect the value of the rent and recovery costs foregone during a reasonable lease-up period as if the acquired space was vacant. We amortize any acquired lease-related intangibles to revenue or amortization expense over the remaining life of the associated lease plus any assumed bargain renewal periods. If a lease is terminated prior to its stated expiration or not renewed upon expiration, we recognize all unamortized amounts of lease-related intangibles associated with that lease in operations at that time.over the shortened lease term.

We estimate the fair value of purchase option intangible assets and liabilities, if any, by discounting the difference between the applicable property’s acquisition date fair value and an estimate of its future option price. We do not amortize the resulting intangible asset or liability over the term of the lease, but rather adjust the recognized value of the asset or liability upon sale.
We estimate the fair value of tenant or other customer relationships acquired, if any, by considering the nature and extent of existing relationships with the tenant or customer, growth prospects for developing new business with the tenant or customer, the tenant’s credit quality, expectations of lease renewals with the tenant, and the potential for significant, additional future leasing arrangements with the tenant, and we amortize that value over the expected life of the associated arrangements or leases, including the remaining terms of the related leases and any expected renewal periods. We estimate the fair value of trade names and trademarks using a royalty rate methodology and amortize that value over the estimated useful life of the trade name or trademark.
In connection with an acquisition, we may assume rights and obligations under certain lease agreements pursuant to which we become the lessee of a given property. We generally assume the lease classification previously determined by the prior lessee absent a modification in the assumed lease agreement. We assess assumed operating leases, including ground leases, to determine whether the lease terms are favorable or unfavorable to us given current market conditions on the acquisition date. To the extent the lease terms are favorable or unfavorable to us relative to market conditions on the acquisition date, we recognize an intangible asset or liability at fair value and amortize that asset or liability to interest or rental expense in our Consolidated Statements of Income over the applicable lease term. We include all lease-related intangibleWhere we are the lessee, we record the acquisition date values of leases, including any above or below market value, within operating lease assets and liabilities within acquiredoperating lease intangibles and accounts payable and other liabilities respectively, on our Consolidated Balance Sheets.
We determine the fair value of loans receivable acquired by discounting the estimated future cash flows using current interest rates at which similar loans with the same terms and length to maturity would be made to borrowers with similar credit ratings. We do not establish a valuation allowance at the acquisition date because the estimated future cash flows already reflect our judgment regarding their uncertainty. We recognize the difference between the acquisition date fair value and the total expected cash flows as interest income using an effective interest method over the life of the applicable loan. Subsequent to the acquisition date, we evaluate changes regarding the uncertainty of future cash flows and the need for a valuation allowance, as appropriate.
We estimate the fair value of noncontrolling interests assumed consistent with the manner in which we value all of the underlying assets and liabilities.

We calculate the fair value of long-term assumed debt by discounting the remaining contractual cash flows on each instrument at the current market rate for those borrowings, which we approximate based on the rate at which we would expect to incur a replacement instrument on the date of acquisition, and recognize any fair value adjustments related to long-term debt as effective yield adjustments over the remaining term of the instrument.

87

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

Impairment of Long-Lived and Intangible Assets

We periodically evaluate our long-lived assets, primarily consisting of investments in real estate, for impairment indicators. If indicators of impairment are present, we evaluate the carrying value of the related real estate investments in relation to the future undiscounted cash flows of the underlying operations. In performing this evaluation, we consider market conditions and our current intentions with respect to holding or disposing of the asset. We adjust the net book value of leasedreal estate properties and other long-lived assets to fair value if the sum of the expected future undiscounted cash flows, including sales proceeds, is less than book value. We recognize an impairment loss at the time we make any such determination.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)


If impairment indicators arise with respect to intangible assets with finite useful lives, we evaluate impairment by comparing the carrying amount of the asset to the estimated future undiscounted net cash flows expected to be generated by the asset. If estimated future undiscounted net cash flows are less than the carrying amount of the asset, then we estimate the fair value of the asset and compare the estimated fair value to the intangible asset’s carrying value. We recognize any shortfall from carrying value as an impairment loss in the current period.

We evaluate our investments in unconsolidated entities for impairment at least annually, and whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying value of our investment may exceed its fair value. If we determine that a decline in the fair value of our investment in an unconsolidated entity is other-than-temporary, and if such reduced fair value is below the carrying value, we record an impairment.

We test goodwill for impairment at least annually, and more frequently if indicators arise. We first assess qualitative factors, such as current macroeconomic conditions, state of the equity and capital markets and our overall financial and operating performance, to determine the likelihood that the fair value of a reporting unit is less than its carrying amount. If we determine it is more likely than not that the fair value of a reporting unit is less than its carrying amount, we proceed with the two-step approach to evaluating impairment. First, we estimateestimating the fair value of the reporting unitunit. On January 1, 2020, we adopted ASU 2017-04, Simplifying the Test for Goodwill Impairment, which removes the traditional “Step 2” of the goodwill impairment test that required a hypothetical purchase price allocation. A goodwill impairment, if any, will be recognized in the period it is determined and compare it tois now measured as the amount by which a reporting unit’s carrying value. If the carrying value exceeds its fair value, we proceed with the second step, which requires us to assign the fair value of the reporting unit to all of the assets and liabilities of the reporting unit as if it had been acquired in a business combination at the date of the impairment test. The excess fair value of the reporting unit over the amounts assigned to the assets and liabilities is the implied value of goodwill and is used to determine the amount of impairment. We recognize an impairment loss to the extent the carrying value of goodwill exceeds the implied value in the current period.value.

Estimates of fair value used in our evaluation of goodwill (if necessary based on our qualitative assessment), investments in real estate, investments in unconsolidated entities and intangible assets are based upon discounted future cash flow projections or other acceptable valuation techniques that are based, in turn, upon all available evidence including level three inputs, such as revenue and expense growth rates, estimates of future cash flows, capitalization rates, discount rates, general economic conditions and trends, or other available market data.data such as replacement cost or comparable transactions. Our ability to accurately predict future operating results and cash flows and to estimate and determine fair values impacts the timing and recognition of impairments. While we believe our assumptions are reasonable, changes in these assumptions may have a material impact on our financial results.

Assets Held for Sale and Discontinued Operations

We sell properties from time to time for various reasons, including favorable market conditions or the exercise of purchase options by tenants. We classify certain long-lived assets as held for sale once the criteria, as defined by GAAP, hashave been met. Long-lived assets to be disposed of are reported at the lower of their carrying amount or fair value minus cost to sell and are no longer depreciated.

If at any time we determine that the criteria for classifying assets as held for sale are no longer met, we reclassify assets within net real estate investments on our Consolidated Balance Sheets for all periods presented. The carrying amount of these assets is adjusted (in the period in which a change in classification is determined) to reflect any depreciation expense that would have been recognized had the asset been continuously classified as net real estate investments.

We report discontinued operations when the following criteria are met: (1) a component of an entity or group of components that has been disposed of or classified as held for sale and represents a strategic shift that has or will have a major effect on an entity’s operations and financial results; or (2) an acquired business that is classified as held for sale on the acquisition date. Assets relating to the CCP Spin-Off were reported as discontinued operations once the transaction was completed. The results of operations for assets meeting the definition of discontinued operations are reflected in our Consolidated Statements of Income as discontinued operations for all periods presented. We allocate estimated interest expense to discontinued operations based on property values and our weighted average interest rate or the property’s actual mortgage interest.


88

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

Loans Receivable

We record loans receivable, other than those acquired in connection with a business combination, on our Consolidated Balance Sheets (either in secured loans receivable and investments, net or other assets, in the case of non-mortgage loans receivable) at the unpaid principal balance, net of any deferred origination fees, purchase discounts or premiums and valuation allowances. We amortize net deferred origination fees, which are comprised of loan fees collected from the borrower net of certain direct costs, and purchase discounts or premiums over the contractual life of the loan using the effective interest method and immediately recognize in income any unamortized balances if the loan is repaid before its contractual maturity.

On January 1, we adopted ASU 2016-13, Measurement of Credit Losses on Financial Instruments (“ASU 2016-13”). The amendments in ASU 2016-13 require us to evaluate a current estimate of all expected credit losses over the life of a financial instrument, which may result in earlier recognition of credit losses on loans and other financial instruments. Under prior guidance, we generally only considered past events and current conditions in measuring an incurred loss. We regularly evaluatewill establish a reserve for any estimated credit losses using this model with a corresponding charge to net income. We adopted ASU 2016-13 using the collectibilitymodified retrospective method and we established no reserve upon adoption. Our evaluation of credit losses of loans receivable is based on factors such as corporate and facility-level financial and operational reports, compliance with financial covenants set forth in the applicable loan agreement, the financial strength of the borrower and any guarantor, the payment history of the borrower, and current economic conditions. If our evaluation of these factors indicates it is probable that we will be unable to collect all amounts due under the terms of the applicable loan agreement, we provide a reserve against the portion of the receivable that we estimate may not be collected.conditions and reasonable and supportable forecasts.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)



Cash Equivalents

Cash equivalents consist of highly liquid investments with a maturity date of three months or less when purchased. These investments are stated at cost, which approximates fair value.

Escrow Deposits and Restricted Cash

Escrow deposits consist of amounts held by us or our lenders to provide for future real estate tax, insurance expenditures and tenant improvements related to our properties and operations. Restricted cash generally represents amounts paid to us for security deposits and other similar purposes.

Deferred Financing Costs

We amortize deferred financing costs, which are reported within senior notes payable and other debt on our Consolidated Balance Sheets, as a component of interest expense over the terms of the related borrowings using a method that approximates a level yield. Amortized costs of approximately $18.9$23.0 million,, $17.9 $20.2 million and $18.7$18.1 million were included in interest expense for the years ended December 31, 2017, 20162020, 2019 and 2015,2018, respectively.
Marketable Debt and Equity
Available for Sale Securities

We record marketable debt and equityclassify available for sale securities as available-for-sale and classify them as a component of other assets on our Consolidated Balance Sheets (other than our interests in government-sponsored pooled loan investments, which are classified as secured loans receivable and investments, net on our Consolidated Balance Sheets). We record these securities at fair value and include unrealized gains and losses recorded in stockholders’ equity as a component of accumulated other comprehensive income on our Consolidated Balance Sheets. If we determine that a credit loss exists with respect to individual investments, we will recognize an allowance against the amortized cost basis of the investment with a corresponding charge to net income. We report interest income, including discount or premium amortization, on marketable debtavailable for sale securities and gains or losses on securities sold, which are based on the specific identification method, in income from loans and investments in our Consolidated Statements of Income.

Derivative Instruments

We recognize all derivative instruments in other assets or accounts payable and other liabilities on our Consolidated Balance Sheets at fair value as of the reporting date. We recognize changes in the fair value of derivative instruments in other expenses in our Consolidated Statements of Income or accumulated other comprehensive income on our Consolidated Balance Sheets, depending on the intended use of the derivative and our designation of the instrument.

We do not use our derivative financial instruments, including interest rate caps, interest rate swaps and foreign currency forward contracts, for trading or speculative purposes. Our foreign currency forward contracts and certain of our interest rate swaps (including the interest rate swap contracts of consolidated and unconsolidated joint ventures) are designated as effectively hedging the variability of expected cash flows related to their underlying securities and, therefore, also are
89

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

recorded on our Consolidated Balance Sheets at fair value, with changes in the fair value of these instruments recognized in accumulated other comprehensive income on our Consolidated Balance Sheets. We recognize any noncontrolling interests’ proportionate share of the changes in fair value of swap contracts of our consolidated joint ventures in noncontrolling interests on our Consolidated Balance Sheets. We recognize our proportionate share of the change in fair value of swap contracts of our unconsolidated joint ventures in accumulated other comprehensive income on our Consolidated Balance Sheets. Certain of our other interest rate swaps and rate caps were not designated as having a hedging relationship with the underlying securities and therefore do not meet the criteria for hedge accounting under GAAP. Accordingly, these interest rate swaps are recorded on our Consolidated Balance Sheets at fair value, and we recognize changes in the fair value of these instruments in current earnings (in other expenses) in our Consolidated Statements of Income.

Fair Values of Financial Instruments

Fair value is a market-based measurement, not an entity-specific measurement, and we determine fair value based on the assumptions that we expect market participants would use in pricing the asset or liability. As a basis for considering market participant assumptions in fair value measurements, GAAP establishes a fair value hierarchy that distinguishes between market participant assumptions based on market data obtained from sources independent of the reporting entity (observable inputs that are classified within levels one and two of the hierarchy) and the reporting entity’s own assumptions about market participant assumptions (unobservable inputs classified within level three of the hierarchy).

Level one inputs utilize unadjusted quoted prices for identical assets or liabilities in active markets that we have the ability to access. Level two inputs are inputs other than quoted prices included in level one that are directly or indirectly observable for the asset or liability. Level two inputs may include quoted prices for similar assets and liabilities in active markets and other inputs for the asset or liability that are observable at commonly quoted intervals, such as interest rates, foreign exchange rates and yield curves. Level three inputs are unobservable inputs for the asset or liability, which typically are based on our own assumptions, because there is little, if any, related market activity. If the determination of the fair value
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)


measurement is based on inputs from different levels of the hierarchy, the level within which the entire fair value measurement falls is the lowest levellowest-level input that is significant to the fair value measurement in its entirety. If the volume and level of market activity for an asset or liability has decreased significantly relative to the normal market activity for such asset or liability (or similar assets or liabilities), then transactions or quoted prices may not accurately reflect fair value. In addition, if there is evidence that a transaction for an asset or liability is not orderly, little, if any, weight is placed on that transaction price as an indicator of fair value. Our assessment of the significance of a particular input to the fair value measurement in its entirety requires judgment and considers factors specific to the asset or liability.

We use the following methods and assumptions in estimating the fair value of our financial instruments.instruments whose fair value is determined on a recurring basis.

Cash and cash equivalents - The carrying amount of unrestricted cash and cash equivalents reported on our Consolidated Balance Sheets approximates fair value due to the short maturity of these instruments.

Escrow deposits and restricted cash - The carrying amount of escrow deposits and restricted cash reported on our Consolidated Balance Sheets approximates fair value due to the short maturity of these instruments.

Loans receivable - We estimate the fair value of loans receivable using level two and level three inputs. We discount future cash flows using current interest rates at which similar loans with the same terms and length to maturity would be made to borrowers with similar credit ratings.

Marketable debtAvailable for sale securities - We estimate the fair value of corporate bonds, if any,marketable debt securities using level two inputs. We observe quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities in active markets that we have the ability to access. We estimate the fair value of certain government-sponsored pooled loan investments using level three inputs. We consider credit spreads, underlying asset performance and credit quality, and default rates.

Derivative instruments - With the assistance of a third party, we estimate the fair value of derivative instruments, including interest rate caps, interest rate swaps, and foreign currency forward contracts, using level two inputs.

Interest rate caps - We observe forward yield curves and other relevant information.

Interest rate swaps - We observe alternative financing rates derived from market-based financing rates, forward yield curves and discount rates.

90
Interest rate caps - We observe forward yield curves and other relevant information;
Interest rate swaps - We observe alternative financing rates derived from market-based financing rates, forward yield curves and discount rates; and
Foreign currency forward contracts - We estimate the future values of the two currency tranches using forward exchange rates that are based on traded forward points and calculate a present value of the net amount using a discount factor based on observable traded interest rates.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

Foreign currency forward contracts - We estimate the future values of the two currency tranches using forward exchange rates that are based on traded forward points and calculate a present value of the net amount using a discount factor based on observable traded interest rates.

Stock warrants - We estimate the fair value of stock warrants using level two inputs that are obtained from public sources. Inputs include equity spot price, dividend yield, volatility and risk-free rate.

Senior notes payable and other debt - We estimate the fair value of senior notes payable and other debt using level two inputs. We discount the future cash flows using current interest rates at which we could obtain similar borrowings. For mortgage debt, we may estimate fair value using level three inputs, similar to those used in determining fair value of loans receivable (above).

Redeemable OP unitholder interests - We estimate the fair value of our redeemable OP Unitholder Interestsunitholder interests using level one inputs. We base fair value on the closing price of our common stock, as OP Units (and previously Class C Units) may be redeemed at the election of the holder for cash or, at our option, shares of our common stock, subject to adjustment in certain circumstances.

Revenue Recognition

Triple-Net Leased Properties and Office Operations

Certain of our triple-net leases and most of our MOB and life scienceresearch and innovation centercenters (collectively, “office operations”) leases provide for periodic and determinable increases in base rent. We recognize base rental revenues under these leases on a straight-line basis over the applicable lease term when collectability of substantially all rents is reasonably assured.probable. Recognizing rental income on a straight-line basis generally results in recognized revenues during the first half of a lease term exceeding the cash amounts contractually due from our tenants, creating a straight-line rent receivable that is included in other assets on our Consolidated Balance Sheets. At December 31, 20172020 and 2016,2019, this cumulative excess totaled $267.6$169.7 million (net of allowances of $117.8 million) and $244.6$278.8 million, (net of allowances of $109.8 million), respectively (excluding properties classified as held for sale).

Certain of our leases provide for periodic increases in base rent only if certain revenue parameters or other substantive contingencies are met. We recognize the increased rental revenue under these leases as the related parameters or contingencies are met, rather than on a straight-line basis over the applicable lease term.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

We assess the probability of collecting substantially all rents under our leases based on several factors, including, among other things, payment history, the financial strength of the tenant and any guarantors, the historical operations and operating trends of the property, the historical payment pattern of the tenant, the type of property, the value of the underlying collateral, if any, expected future performance of the property and current economic conditions. If our evaluation of these factors indicates it is not probable that we will be able to collect substantially all rents under the lease, we record a charge to rental income. If we change our conclusions regarding the probability of collecting rent payments required by a lease, we may recognize adjustments to rental income in the period we make such change in our conclusions.


Senior Living Operations
We
Our resident agreements are accounted for as leases and we recognize resident fees and services, other than move-in fees, monthly as services are provided. We recognize move-in fees on a straight-line basis over the average resident stay. Our lease agreements with residents generally have terms of 12 to 18 months and are cancelable by the resident upon 30 days’ notice.
Other
Other

We recognize interest income from loans and investments, including discounts and premiums, using the effective interest method when collectibilitycollectability is reasonably assured. We apply the effective interest method on a loan-by-loan basis and recognize discounts and premiums as yield adjustments over the related loan term. We evaluate collectability of accrued interest receivables separate from the amortized cost basis of our loans. As such, we recognize interest income on an impaired loan to the extent our estimate of the fair value of the collateralwe believe accrued contractual interest payments are collectable. Otherwise, interest income is sufficient to support the balance of the loan, other receivables and all related accrued interest. When the balance of the loan, other receivables and all related accrued interest is equal to or less than our estimate of the fair value of the collateral, we recognize interest incomerecognized on a cash basis.     

Accounting for Leased Property

We lease real property, primarily land and corporate office space, and equipment, primarily vehicles at our senior housing communities. At lease inception, we establish an operating lease asset and operating lease liability calculated as the
91

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

present value of future minimum lease payments. As our leases do not provide an implicit rate, we use a reserve against an impaired loandiscount rate that approximates our incremental borrowing rate available at lease commencement to determine the extent our total investmentpresent value. Our lease expense primarily consists of ground and corporate office leases. Ground lease expense is included in interest expense and corporate office lease expense is included in general, administrative and professional fees in the loan exceeds our estimateCompany’s Consolidated Statements of the fair value of the loan collateral.Income.
We recognize income from rent, lease termination fees, development services, management advisory services and all other income when all of the following criteria are met in accordance with Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) Staff Accounting Bulletin 104: (i) the applicable agreement has been fully executed and delivered; (ii) services have been rendered; (iii) the amount is fixed or determinable; and (iv) collectibility is reasonably assured.
Allowances
We assess the collectibility of our rent receivables, including straight-line rent receivables. We base our assessment of the collectibility of rent receivables (other than straight-line rent receivables) on several factors, including, among other things, payment history, the financial strength of the tenant and any guarantors, the value of the underlying collateral, if any, and current economic conditions. If our evaluation of these factors indicates it is probable that we will be unable to recover the full value of the receivable, we provide a reserve against the portion of the receivable that we estimate may not be recovered. We base our assessment of the collectibility of straight-line rent receivables on several factors, including, among other things, the financial strength of the tenant and any guarantors, the historical operations and operating trends of the property, the historical payment pattern of the tenant and the type of property. If our evaluation of these factors indicates it is probable that we will be unable to receive the rent payments due in the future, we provide a reserve against the recognized straight-line rent receivable asset for the portion, up to its full value, that we estimate may not be recovered. If we change our assumptions or estimates regarding the collectibility of future rent payments required by a lease, we may adjust our reserve to increase or reduce the rental revenue recognized in the period we make such change in our assumptions or estimates.
Stock-Based Compensation

We recognize share-based payments to employees and directors, including grants of stock options and restricted stock, included in general, administrative and professional fees in our Consolidated Statements of Income generally on a straight-line basis over the requisite service period based on the grant date fair value of the award.

Gain on Sale of Assets

On January 1, 2018, we adopted the provisions of Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) 610-20, Gains and Losses from the Derecognition of Nonfinancial Assets (“ASC 610-20”). In accordance with ASC 610-20, we recognize any gains when we transfer control of a property and when it is probable that we will collect substantially all of the related consideration. We recognizeadopted ASC 610-20 using the modified retrospective method and recognized a cumulative effect adjustment to retained earnings of $31.2 million relating to deferred gains on sales of real estate assets only upon the closing of the transaction with the purchaser. We record payments received from purchasers prior to closing as deposits and classify them as other assets on our Consolidated Balance Sheets. We recognize gains (net of any taxes) on assets sold using the full accrual method upon closing if the collectibility of the sales price is reasonably assured, we are not obligated to perform any significant activities after the sale to earn the profit, we have received adequate initial investment from the purchaser and other profit recognition criteria have been satisfied. We may defer recognition of gains in whole or in part until: (i) the profit is determinable, meaning that the collectibility of the sales price is reasonably assured or the amount that will not be collectible can be estimated; and (ii) the earnings process is virtually complete, meaning that we are not obliged to perform any significant activities after the sale to earn the profit.2015.

Federal Income Tax

We have elected to be treated as a REIT under the applicable provisions of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the “Code”), for every year beginning with the year ended December 31, 1999. Accordingly, we generally are not subject to federal income tax on net income that we distribute to our stockholders, provided that we continue to qualify as a REIT. However, with respect to certain of our subsidiaries that have elected to be treated as taxable REIT subsidiaries (“TRS” or “TRS entities”), we record income tax expense or benefit, as those entities are subject to federal income tax similar to regular corporations. Certain foreign subsidiaries are subject to foreign income tax, although they did not elect to be treated as TRSs.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)


We account for deferred income taxes using the asset and liability method and recognize deferred tax assets and liabilities for the expected future tax consequences of events that have been included in our financial statements or tax returns. Under this method, we determine deferred tax assets and liabilities based on the differences between the financial reporting and tax bases of assets and liabilities using enacted tax rates in effect for the year in which the differences are expected to reverse. Any increase or decrease in the deferred tax liability that results from a change in circumstances, and that causes us to change our judgment about expected future tax consequences of events, is included in the tax provision when such changes occur. Deferred income taxes also reflect the impact of operating loss and tax credit carryforwards. A valuation allowance is provided if we believe it is more likely than not that all or some portion of the deferred tax asset will not be realized. Any increase or decrease in the valuation allowance that results from a change in circumstances, and that causes us to change our judgment about the realizability of the related deferred tax asset, is included in the tax provision when such changes occur.

We recognize the tax benefit from an uncertain tax position claimed or expected to be claimed on a tax return only if it is more likely than not that the tax position will be sustained on examination by taxing authorities, based on the technical merits of the position. The tax benefits recognized in the financial statements from such a position are measured based on the largest benefit that has a greater than fifty percent likelihood of being realized upon ultimate settlement. We recognize interest and penalties, if applicable, related to uncertain tax positions as part of income tax benefit or expense.

Foreign Currency

Certain of our subsidiaries’ functional currencies are the local currencies of their respective foreign jurisdictions. We translate the results of operations of our foreign subsidiaries into U.S. dollars using average rates of exchange in effect during the period, and we translate balance sheet accounts using exchange rates in effect at the end of the period. We record resulting currency translation adjustments in accumulated other comprehensive income, a component of stockholders’ equity, on our Consolidated Balance Sheets, and we record foreign currency transaction gains and losses in other expense in our Consolidated Statements of Income. We recognize any noncontrolling interests’ proportionate share of currency translation adjustments of our foreign consolidated joint ventures in noncontrolling interests on our Consolidated Balance Sheets.

92

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

Segment Reporting

As of December 31, 2017, 20162020, 2019 and 2015,2018, we operated through three3 reportable business segments: triple-net leased properties, senior living operations and office operations. Under our triple-net leased properties segment, we invest in and own seniorssenior housing and healthcare properties throughout the United States and the United Kingdom and lease those properties to healthcare operating companies under “triple-net” or “absolute-net” leases that obligate the tenants to pay all property-related expenses. In our senior living operations segment, we invest in seniorssenior housing communities throughout the United States and Canada and engage independent operators, such as Atria and Sunrise, to manage those communities. In our office operations segment, we primarily acquire, own, develop, lease and manage MOBs and life scienceresearch and innovation centers throughout the United States. See “NOTE 19—SEGMENT INFORMATION.“Note 19 – Segment Information.
Operating Leases
We account for payments made pursuant to operating leases in our Consolidated Statements of Income based on actual rent paid, plus or minus a straight-line rent adjustment for leases that provide for periodic and determinable increases in base rent.
Recently Issued or Adopted Accounting Standards
On January 1, 2017, we
We adopted ASU 2016-09, Compensation - Stock Compensation (“ASU 2016-09”) which simplifies several aspects of the accounting for employee share-based payment transactions, including the accounting for forfeitures and statutory tax withholding requirements, as well as classification in the statement of cash flows. Adoption of ASU 2016-09 did not have a significant impact on our Consolidated Financial Statements.
In 2014, the FASB issued ASU 2014-09, Revenue From Contracts With Customers (“ASU 2014-09”, as codified in “ASC 606”), which outlines a comprehensive model for entities to use in accounting for revenue arising from contracts with customers. ASC 606 states that “an entity recognizes revenue to depict the transfer of promised goods or services to customers in an amount that reflects the consideration to which the entity expects to be entitled in exchange for those goods or services.” While Topic 842, Leases (“ASC 606 specifically references contracts with customers, it also applied to other transactions such as the sale of real estate. ASC 606 is effective for us beginning January 1, 2018 and we plan to adopt ASC 606 using the modified retrospective method.
We have evaluated all of our revenue streams to identify whether each revenue stream would be subject to the provisions of ASC 606 and any differences in the timing, measurement or presentation of revenue recognition. Based on a review of our various revenue streams, we believe the following items in our Consolidated Statements of Income are subject to
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)


ASC 606: office building and other services revenue, certain elements of our resident fees and services and gains on the sale of real estate. Our office building and other services revenues are primarily generated by management contracts where we provide management, leasing, marketing, facility development and advisory services. Resident fees and services primarily include amounts related to resident leases (subject to ASC 840, Leases842”) but also includes revenues generated through point-of-sale transactions that are ancillary to the residents’ contractual rights to occupy living and common-area space at the communities. While these revenue streams are subject to the provisions of ASC 606, we believe that the pattern and timing of recognition of income will be consistent with the current accounting model.
As it relates to gains on sale of real estate, we will apply the provisions of ASC 610-20, Gain or Loss From Derecognition of Non-financial Assets (“ASC 610-20”), and we expect to recognize any gains when we transfer control of a property and when it is probable that we will collect substantially all of the related consideration. We will no longer apply existing sales criteria in ASC 360, Property, Plant, and Equipment. We will recognize on January 1, 2018, through a cumulative effect adjustment to retained earnings, $31.2 million of deferred gains relating to sales of real estate assets in 2015. Other than the cumulative effect adjustment relating to such deferred gains, the adoption of ASC 606 and ASC 610-20 will not have a significant impact on our Consolidated Financial Statements. Our remaining implementation item includes finalizing revised disclosures in accordance with the new standard.
In February 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-02, Leases (“ASU 2016-02”),2019, which introducesintroduced a lessee model that brings most leases on the balance sheet and, among other changes, eliminates the requirement in current GAAP for an entity to use bright-line tests in determining lease classification. The FASBUpon adoption, we recognized both right of use assets and lease liabilities for leases in which we lease land, real property or other equipment. We now also issued an Exposure Draft on January 5, 2018 proposingreport revenues and expenses within our triple-net leased properties reportable business segment for real estate taxes and insurance that are escrowed and obligations of the tenants in accordance with their respective leases with us. Also, we now expense certain leasing costs, other than leasing commissions, as they are incurred. Prior to amend ASU 2016-02, which would provide lessors with a practical expedient, by classthe adoption of underlying assets, to not separate non-lease components fromASC 842, GAAP provided for the relateddeferral and amortization of such costs over the applicable lease components and, instead, to account for those components as a single lease component, if certain criteria are met. ASU 2016-02 and the related Exposure Draft are not effective for us untilterm.

We used January 1, 2019 with early adoption permitted. Weas the date of initial application. Therefore, financial information and disclosures under ASC 842 are continuingnot provided for periods prior to evaluate this guidance and the impact to us, as both lessor and lessee, on our Consolidated Financial Statements. We expect to utilize the practical expedients proposed in the Exposure Draft as part of our adoption of ASU 2016-02.
In 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-15, Classification of Certain Cash Receipts and Cash Payments (“ASU 2016-15”), which provides clarification regarding how certain cash receipts and cash payments are presented and classified in the statement of cash flows and ASU 2016-18, Restricted Cash (“ASU 2016-18”), which requires an entity to show the changes in total cash, cash equivalents, restricted cash and restricted cash equivalents in the statement of cash flows. ASU 2016-15 and ASU 2016-18 are effective for us beginning January 1, 2018 and will be applied by us using2019. Upon adoption, we recognized a retrospective transition method. Adoptioncumulative effect adjustment to retained earnings of these standards is not expected$0.6 million primarily relating to have a significant impact on our Consolidated Financial Statements.certain costs associated with unexecuted leases that were deferred as of December 31, 2018.
In 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-16, Intra-Entity Transfers of Assets Other Than Inventory (“ASU 2016-16”), which requires a company to recognize the tax consequences of an intra-entity transfer of an asset, other than inventory, when the transfer occurs. ASU 2016-16 is effective for us beginning January 1, 2018 and will be applied by us using a modified retrospective method. Adoption of this standard is not expected to have a significant impact on our Consolidated Financial Statements.
Reclassifications

Certain prior year amounts have been reclassified to conform to the current year presentation. In 2020 and for all periods presented, certain tax and insurance related expenses have been reclassified from general, administrative and professional fees to other expense in our Consolidated Statements of Income.



NOTE 3—3–CONCENTRATION OF CREDIT RISK


As of December 31, 2017,2020, Atria, Sunrise, Brookdale Senior Living, Ardent and Kindred managed or operated approximately 22.3%20.8%, 10.8%10.4%, 7.5%8.2%, 4.9% and 1.1%, respectively, of our consolidated real estate investments based on gross book value (excluding properties classified as held for sale as of December 31, 2017)2020). Because Atria and Sunrise manage our properties in exchange for the receipt of a management fee from us, we are not directly exposed to the credit risk of our managers in the same manner or to the same extent as our triple-net tenants.


Based on gross book value, approximately 25.9%15.6% and 35.1%47.9% of our consolidated real estate investments were seniorssenior housing communities included in the triple-net leased properties and senior living operations reportable business segments, respectively (excluding properties classified as held for sale and properties owned through investments in unconsolidated entities as of December 31, 2017)2020). MOBs, life scienceresearch and innovation centers, IRFs and LTACs, health systems, SNFsskilled nursing facilities (“SNFs”) and secured loans receivable and investments collectively comprised the remaining 39.0%36.5%. Our consolidated properties were located in 4645 states, the District of Columbia, seven Canadian provinces and the United Kingdom as of December 31, 2017,2020, with properties in one
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)


1 state (California) accounting for more than 10% of our total continuing revenues and net operating income (“NOI,” which is defined as total revenues, excluding interest and other income, less property-level operating expenses and office building services costs) for each of the years ended December 31, 2017, 20162020, 2019 and 2015.2018.


93

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

Triple-Net Leased Properties


The following table reflects ourthe concentration risk related to our triple-net leased properties for the periods presented:
 For the Years Ended December 31,
 202020192018
Revenues(1):
  
Brookdale Senior Living(2)
4.4 %4.7 %4.3 %
Ardent3.2 3.1 3.1 
Kindred3.5 3.3 3.5 
NOI:  
Brookdale Senior Living(2)
9.0 %8.7 %7.6 %
Ardent6.6 5.8 5.7 
Kindred7.1 6.3 6.4 
 For the Year Ended December 31,
 2017 2016 2015
Revenues(1):
     
Brookdale Senior Living(2)
4.7% 4.8% 5.3%
Ardent3.1
 3.1
 1.3
Kindred(3)
4.6
 5.4
 5.7
NOI:     
Brookdale Senior Living(2)
8.0% 8.3% 9.3%
Ardent5.3
 5.3
 2.3
Kindred(3)
7.9
 9.2
 9.9


(1)Total revenues include office building and other services revenue, income from loans and investments and interest and other income.
(1)
(2)2020 results include $21.3 million of amortization of up-front consideration received in 2020 from the Brookdale Lease. 2018 results include the impact of a net non-cash charge of $21.3 million related to April 2018 lease extensions.
Total revenues include office building and other services revenue, income from loans and investments and interest and other income.
(2)
Excludes one seniors housing community included in the senior living operations reportable business segment at December 31, 2017.
(3)
Excludes one MOB included in the office operations reportable business segment.
    
Each of our leases with Brookdale Senior Living, Ardent and Kindred is a triple-net lease that obligates the tenant to pay all property-related expenses, including maintenance, utilities, repairs, taxes, insurance and capital expenditures, and to comply with the terms of the mortgage financing documents, if any, affecting the properties. In addition, each of our Brookdale Senior Living, Ardent and Kindred leases has a corporate guaranty. Brookdale Senior Living has multiple leases with us and those leases contain cross-default provisions tied to each other, as well as lease renewals by lease agreement or by pool of assets.


The properties we lease to Brookdale Senior Living, Ardent and Kindred accounted for a significant portion of our triple-net leased properties segment revenues and NOI for the years ended December 31, 2017, 20162020, 2019 and 2015. If any2018. Refer to Item 1A. Risk Factors.

Brookdale Transactions

In July 2020, we entered into a revised master lease agreement (the “Brookdale Lease”) and certain other agreements (together with the Brookdale Lease, the “Agreements”) with Brookdale Senior Living. The Agreements modify our current arrangements with Brookdale Senior Living as follows:

We received up-front consideration approximating $235 million, which will be amortized over the remaining lease term and consisted of: (a) $162 million in cash including $47 million from the transfer to Ventas of deposits under the Brookdale Lease; (b) a $45 million cash pay note (the “Note”), which has an initial interest rate of 9.0%, increasing 50 basis points per annum, and matures on December 31, 2025; (c) $28 million in warrants exercisable for 16.3 million shares of Brookdale Senior Living Ardent or Kindred becomes unable or unwillingcommon stock, which are exercisable at any time prior to satisfy its obligations to us or to renew its leasesDecember 31, 2025 and have an exercise price of $3.00 per share.

Base cash rent under the Brookdale Lease is set at $100 million per annum starting in July 2020, with us upon expiration3 percent annual escalators commencing on January 1, 2022. The Brookdale Lease is guaranteed by, and the Note is a direct obligation of, the terms thereof,Brookdale Senior Living.

The warrants are classified within other assets on our financial condition and resultsConsolidated Balance Sheets. These warrants are measured at fair value with changes in fair value being recognized within other expense in our Consolidated Statements of operations could decline, and our ability to service our indebtedness and to make distributions to our stockholders could be impaired. We cannot assure you that Income.

Brookdale Senior Living Ardent and Kindred will have sufficient assets, income and access to financing to enable them to satisfy their respective obligationstransferred fee ownership of 5 senior living communities to us, in full satisfaction and any failure, inability or unwillingness byrepayment of a $78 million loan to Brookdale Senior Living Ardent and Kindred to do so could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations and liquidity, our ability to service our indebtedness and other obligations and our ability to make distributions to our stockholders, as required forfrom us to continue to qualify as a REIT (a “Material Adverse Effect”). We also cannot assure you that was secured by the five communities. Brookdale Senior Living Ardent and Kindred will elect to renew their respective leasesnow manage those communities for us under a terminable management agreement.
In April 2018, we entered into various agreements with us upon expirationBrookdale Senior Living that provide for, among other things: (a) a consolidation of substantially all of our multiple lease agreements with Brookdale Senior Living into 1 master lease; (b) extension of the leases or that we will be able to reposition any non-renewedterm for substantially all of our Brookdale Senior Living leased properties on a timely basis or on the same or better economic terms, if at all.until December 31, 2025, with
94

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)



Brookdale Senior Living retaining 2 successive 10-year renewal options; and (c) the guarantee of all the Brookdale Senior Living obligations to us by Brookdale Senior Living Inc., including covenant protections for us. In connection with these agreements, we recognized a net non-cash expense of $21.3 million for the acceleration of straight-line rent receivables, net unamortized market lease intangibles and deferred revenues, which is included in triple-net leased rental income in our Consolidated Statements of Income. We also received a fee of $2.5 million that is being amortized over the new lease term.

Holiday Transaction

In April 2020, we completed a transaction with affiliates of Holiday Retirement (collectively, “Holiday”), including (a) entry into a new, terminable management agreement with Holiday Management Company for our 26 independent living assets previously subject to a triple-net lease (the “Holiday Lease”) with Holiday; (b) termination of the Holiday Lease; and (c) our receipt from Holiday of $33.8 million in cash from the transfer to us of deposits under the Holiday Lease and $66 million in principal amount of secured notes. As a result of the Holiday Lease termination, we recognized $50.2 million within triple-net leased rental income, composed of $99.8 million of cash and notes received less $49.6 million from the write-off of accumulated straight-line receivable.    

2018 Kindred Transaction

In July 2018, Kindred closed transactions (the “Go Private Transactions”) pursuant to which (a) Kindred would be acquired by a consortium of TPG Capital (“TPG”), Welsh, Carson, Anderson & Stowe (“WCAS”) and Humana, Inc., and (b) immediately following the acquisition, (i) Kindred’s home health, hospice and community care businesses would be separated from Kindred and operated as a standalone company owned by Humana, Inc., TPG and WCAS, and (ii) Kindred would be operated as a separate healthcare company owned by TPG and WCAS. In connection with the closing of the transactions, we received a payment from Kindred of $12.3 million, which was recognized in interest and other income in our Consolidated Statements of Income during the third quarter of 2018.

Future Contractual Rents

The following table sets forth the future contracted minimum rentals, excluding contingent rent escalations, but including straight-line rent adjustments and reserves where applicable, for all of our consolidated triple-net and office building leases as of December 31, 20172020 (excluding properties classified as held for sale as of December 31, 2017)2020):
Brookdale Senior LivingArdentKindredOtherTotal
Brookdale Senior Living Ardent Kindred Other Total (In thousands)
(In thousands)
2018$162,346
 $113,361
 $126,087
 $966,445
 $1,368,239
2019151,999
 113,361
 126,127
 912,556
 1,304,043
202035,192
 113,361
 126,169
 860,246
 1,134,968
202114,071
 113,361
 126,211
 799,658
 1,053,301
2021$148,454 $127,505 $133,824 $759,135 $1,168,918 
20223,339
 113,361
 126,254
 699,060
 942,014
2022148,016 127,505 133,828 680,952 1,090,301 
20232023147,555 127,505 112,929 617,589 1,005,578 
20242024147,090 127,505 102,479 567,525 944,599 
20252025146,612 127,505 35,412 483,069 792,598 
Thereafter7,498
 1,435,906
 247,566
 3,580,776
 5,271,746
Thereafter1,219,450 4,228 1,787,143 3,010,821 
Total$374,445
 $2,002,711
 $878,414
 $7,818,741
 $11,074,311
Total$737,727 $1,856,975 $522,700 $4,895,413 $8,012,815 


Senior Living Operations


As of December 31, 2017,2020, Atria and Sunrise, collectively, provided comprehensive property management and accounting services with respect to 273258 of our 297 seniors432 consolidated senior housing communities, for which we pay annual management fees pursuant to long-term management agreements.


We rely on our managers’ personnel, expertise, technical resources and information systems, proprietary information, good faith and judgment to manage our senior living operations efficiently and effectively. We also rely on our managers to set appropriate resident fees, provide accurate property-level financial results in a timely manner and otherwise operate our seniorssenior housing communities in compliance with the terms of our management agreements and all applicable laws and regulations. Although we have various rights as the property owner under our management agreements, including various rights to terminate and exercise remedies under the agreements as provided therein, Atria’s or Sunrise’s failure, inability or unwillingness to satisfy its respective obligations under those agreements, to efficiently and effectively manage our properties or to provide timely and accurate accounting information with respect thereto could have a Material Adverse Effect on us. In addition, significant changes in Atria’s or Sunrise’s senior management or equity ownership or any adverse developments in their businesses or financial condition could have a Material Adverse Effect on us.


Our 34% ownership interest in Atria entitles us to certain rights and minority protections, as well as the right to appoint two of six members on the Atria Board of Directors.
95

Brookdale Senior Living, Kindred, Atria, Sunrise and Ardent Information

Each of Brookdale Senior Living and Kindred is subject to the reporting requirements of the SEC and is required to file with the SEC annual reports containing audited financial information and quarterly reports containing unaudited financial information. The information related to Brookdale Senior Living and Kindred contained or referred to in this Annual Report on Form 10-K has been derived from SEC filings made by Brookdale Senior Living or Kindred, as the case may be, or other publicly available information, or was provided to us by Brookdale Senior Living or Kindred, and we have not verified this information through an independent investigation or otherwise. We have no reason to believe that this information is inaccurate in any material respect, but we cannot assure you of its accuracy. We are providing this data for informational purposes only, and you are encouraged to obtain Brookdale Senior Living’s and Kindred’s publicly available filings, which can be found at the SEC’s website at www.sec.gov.

Atria, Sunrise and Ardent are not currently subject to the reporting requirements of the SEC. The information related to Atria, Sunrise and Ardent contained or referred to in this Annual Report on Form 10-K has been derived from publicly available information or was provided to us by Atria, Sunrise or Ardent, as the case may be, and we have not verified this information through an independent investigation or otherwise. We have no reason to believe that this information is inaccurate in any material respect, but we cannot assure you of its accuracy.


NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)



NOTE 4—4–ACQUISITIONS OF REAL ESTATE PROPERTY


The following summarizes our acquisition and development activities during 2017, 20162020, 2019 and 2015.2018. We acquire and invest in seniorssenior housing, medical office buildings, research and innovation centers and other healthcare properties primarily to achieve an expected yield on our investment, to grow and diversify our portfolio and revenue base, and to reduce our dependence on any single tenant, operator or manager, geographic location, asset type, business model or revenue source.


20172020 Acquisitions


During the year ended December 31, 2017,2020, we acquired 15 triple-net leased properties (including six assets previously owned by an equity method investee), four properties2 research and innovation centers reported within our office operations reportable business segment, (three life science, research and medical assets and one MOB) and three seniors7 senior housing communities (reportedreported within our senior living operations reportable business segment)segment and 1 LTAC reported within our triple-net leased properties reportable business segment for an aggregate purchase priceconsideration of $691.3$249.5 million. Each of these acquisitions was accounted for as an asset acquisition.


During the year ended December 31, 2017, we completed the development of one triple-net leased property, representing $6.9 million of net real estate property on our Consolidated Balance Sheets.

20162019 Acquisitions

Life Sciences Acquisition


In September 2016,2019, we completed the acquisition of substantially all of the university affiliated life science and innovation real estate assets of Wexford from Blackstone for total consideration of $1.5 billion.acquired an 87% interest in 34 Canadian senior housing communities (including 5 in-process developments) valued at $1.8 billion through an equity partnership (the “LGM Acquisition”) with Le Groupe Maurice (“LGM”).  The properties acquired will continueportfolio continues to be managed by Wexford, which will remain a separate management company owned and operated by the existing Wexford management team.LGM.  We also have exclusive rights to fund and own future life science projects developed by Wexford.all additional developments under an exclusive pipeline agreement with LGM.

Other 2016 Acquisitions


During the year ended December 31, 2016,2019, we made other investments totaling approximately $42.3 million, including the acquisitionalso acquired 2 properties reported within our office operations reportable business segment (1 research and innovation center and 1 MOB), 2 senior housing communities reported within our senior living operations reportable business segment and 1 vacant land parcel for an aggregate purchase price of one triple-net leased property and two MOBs.$237.0 million.

Completed Developments

During 2016, we completed the development of three triple-net leased properties (two of which were expansions of existing seniors housing assets), representing $31.9 million of net real estate property on our Consolidated Balance Sheets as of December 31, 2016.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)


Estimated Fair Value

We accounted for our 2016 acquisitions under the acquisition method in accordance with ASC 805, Business Combinations (“ASC 805”). The following table summarizes the acquisition date fair values of the assets acquired and liabilities assumed in our 2016 real estate acquisitions, which we determined using level two and level three inputs:

  Triple-Net Leased Properties Office Operations Total
 (In thousands)
Land and improvements $1,579
 $63,526
 $65,105
Buildings and improvements 12,558
 1,311,676
 1,324,234
Acquired lease intangibles 163
 200,022
 200,185
Other assets 
 99,777
 99,777
Total assets acquired 14,300
 1,675,001
 1,689,301
Notes payable and other debt 
 47,641
 47,641
Intangible liabilities 
 103,769
 103,769
Other liabilities 380
 64,792
 65,172
Total liabilities assumed 380
 216,202
 216,582
Noncontrolling interest assumed 
 24,656
 24,656
Net assets acquired 13,920
 1,434,143
 1,448,063
Cash acquired 
 19,119
 19,119
Total cash used $13,920
 $1,415,024
 $1,428,944

For certain acquisitions, the determination of fair values of the assets acquired and liabilities assumed has changed. We made certain adjustments during 2017 due primarily to reclassification adjustments for presentation and adjustments to our valuation assumptions. The changes to our valuation assumptions were based on more accurate information concerning the subject assets and liabilities. None of these changes had a material impact on our Consolidated Financial Statements.

Aggregate Revenue and NOI

For the year ended December 31, 2016, aggregate revenue and NOI derived from our completed 2016 acquisitions during our period of ownership were $55.7 million and $37.7 million, respectively.

Transaction Costs

Prior to our adoption of ASU 2017-01, transaction costs are expensed as incurred and included in merger-related expenses and deal costs in our Consolidated Statements of Income. During 2016, we expensed as incurred $19.1 million related to our completed 2016 transactions.

2015 Acquisitions

HCT Acquisition

In January 2015, we acquired American Realty Capital Healthcare Trust, Inc. (“HCT”) in a stock and cash transaction, which added 152 properties to our portfolio. At the effective time of the merger, each share of HCT common stock outstanding (other than shares held by us, HCT or our respective subsidiaries, which shares were canceled) was converted into the right to receive either 0.1688 sharesEach of our common stock (with cash paid in lieu of fractional shares) or $11.33 per share in cash, at the election of each HCT shareholder. Shares of HCT common stock for which a valid election2019 acquisitions was not made were converted into the stock consideration. We funded the transaction through the issuance of approximately 28.4 million shares of our common stock and 1.1 million limited partnership units that were redeemable for shares of our common stock and the payment of approximately $11 million in cash (excluding cash in lieu of fractional shares). In addition, we assumed approximately $167
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)


million of mortgage debt and repaid approximately $730 million of debt, net of HCT cash on hand. In August 2015, 20 of the properties that we acquired in the HCT acquisition were disposed of as part of the CCP Spin-Off.

Ardent Health Services Acquisition

On August 4, 2015, we completed our acquisition of Ardent Medical Services, Inc. and simultaneous separation and sale of the Ardent hospital operating company to a consortium composed of an entity controlled by Equity Group Investments, Ardent’s management team and us (collectively the “Ardent Transaction”). As of the acquisition date, we recorded the estimated fair value of our investment in owned hospital and other real estate of approximately $1.3 billion. At closing, we paid $26.3 million for our 9.9% interest in Ardent which represents our estimate of the acquisition date fair value of this interest. Upon closing, we entered into a long-term triple-net master lease with Ardent to operate the ten hospital campuses and other real estate we acquired.

Other 2015 Acquisitions

In 2015, we made other investments totaling approximately $612 million, including the acquisition of eleven triple-net
leased properties; nine MOBs (including eight MOBs that we had previously accounted for as investments in unconsolidated entities; see “NOTE 7—INVESTMENTS IN UNCONSOLIDATED ENTITIES”) and 12 skilled nursing facilities (all of which were disposed of as part of the CCP Spin-Off).an asset acquisition.


Completed Developments2018 Acquisitions


During 2015, we completed the development of one triple-net leased seniors housing community, representing $9.3 million of net real estate property on our Consolidated Balance Sheets as of December 31, 2015.

Estimated Fair Value

We accounted for our 2015 acquisitions under the acquisition method in accordance with ASC 805. The following table summarizes the acquisition date fair values of the assets acquired and liabilities assumed, which we determined using level two and level three inputs:
 Triple-Net Leased Properties Senior Living Operations Office Operations Total
 (In thousands)
Land and improvements$190,566
 $70,713
 $173,307
 $434,586
Buildings and improvements1,726,063
 703,080
 1,214,546
 3,643,689
Acquired lease intangibles169,362
 83,867
 184,540
 437,769
Other assets174,093
 272,888
 402,734
 849,715
Total assets acquired2,260,084
 1,130,548
 1,975,127
 5,365,759
Notes payable and other debt
 77,940
 99,917
 177,857
Other liabilities45,924
 45,408
 46,565
 137,897
Total liabilities assumed45,924
 123,348
 146,482
 315,754
Net assets acquired$2,214,160
 $1,007,200
 $1,828,645
 5,050,005
Redeemable OP unitholder interests assumed      88,085
Cash acquired      59,584
Equity issued      2,216,355
Total cash used      $2,685,981

Included in other assets above is $746.9 million of goodwill, which represents the excess of the purchase price over the fair value of the assets acquired and liabilities assumed as of the acquisition date. A substantial amount of this goodwill was due to an increase in our stock price between the announcement date and closing dates of the HCT acquisition. Goodwill has been allocated to our reportable business segments based on the respective fair value of the net assets acquired, as follows: triple-net leased properties - $133.6 million; senior living operations - $219.1 million; and office operations - $394.2 million.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)


Aggregate Revenue and NOI

For the year ended December 31, 2015, aggregate revenue and NOI derived from our 2015 real estate acquisitions during our period of ownership were $327.0 million and $201.9 million, respectively, excluding revenue and NOI for any assets contributed in the CCP Spin-Off.

Transaction Costs

Prior to our adoption of ASU 2017-01, transaction costs are expensed as incurred and included in merger-related expenses and deal costs in our Consolidated Statements of Income. For the year ending December 31, 2015, we expensed as incurred $99.0 million of costs related to our completed 2015 transactions, $4.1 million of which is reported within discontinued operations. These transaction costs exclude any separation costs associated with the CCP Spin-Off (refer to “NOTE 5—DISPOSITIONS”).


NOTE 5—DISPOSITIONS
2017 Activity

During the year ended December 31, 2017,2018, we acquired 5 properties reported within our office operations reportable business segment (4 MOBs and 1 research and innovation center) and 1 senior housing community reported within our senior living operations reportable business segment for an aggregate purchase price of $311.3 million. Each of these acquisitions was accounted for as an asset acquisition.


NOTE 5–DISPOSITIONS AND IMPAIRMENTS
2020 Activity

We recognized $262.2 million of gains on sale of real estate in 2020 as described below.

In March 2020, we formed the Ventas Life Science and Healthcare Real Estate Fund, L.P. (the “Ventas Fund”), a perpetual life vehicle that focuses on investments in research and innovation centers, medical office buildings and senior housing communities in North America. To seed the Ventas Fund, we contributed 6 (2 of which are on the same campus) stabilized research and innovation and medical office properties. We received cash consideration of $620 million and a 21% interest in the Ventas Fund. We recognized a gain on the transactions of $225.1 million.

In October 2020, we formed a joint venture (the “R&I Development JV”) with GIC. To seed the R&I Development JV, we contributed our controlling ownership interest in four in-progress university-based research and innovation development projects (the “Initial R&I JV Projects”). At closing, GIC reimbursed Ventas for its share of costs incurred to date and we recognized a gain of $13.7 million. We own an over 50% interest and GIC owns a 45% interest in the Initial R&I JV Projects. The R&I Development JV may be expanded in the future to include other pre-identified R&I development projects.

See “Note 7 - Investments in Unconsolidated Entities” for additional details on the Ventas Fund and the JV.

Also during 2020, we sold 534 MOBs, 4 senior housing communities, 22 triple-net leased properties five MOBs and certain vacant1 land parcelsparcel for aggregate consideration of $870.8$249.6 million, and we recognized a gain on the sale of these assets of $717.3 million, net of taxes.$23.4 million.

96

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
SNF Dispositions


In November 2016, we entered into agreements with Kindred providing that Kindred will either acquire all 36 SNFs owned by us and operated by Kindred (the “Ventas SNFs”) for $700 million, in connection with Kindred’s previously announced plan to exit its SNF business; or, renew2019 Activity

During the current lease on all unpurchased Ventas SNFs not purchased by Kindred by April 30, 2018 until 2025 at the current rent level plus annual escalations. On June 30, 2017, Kindred announced that it had signed definitive agreements to sell its entire SNF business to an affiliate of Blue Mountain Capital Management, LLC and that, as Kindred closes on the sale of its SNFs, Kindred will pay to us its allocable portion of the sale proceeds for a total of approximately $700 million aggregate purchase price for the Ventas SNFs, and we will convey the applicable Ventas SNFs to the ultimate buyer. 

During 2017,year ended December 31, 2019, we sold the 36 Ventas SNFs, included10 triple-net leased properties, 8 MOBs, 6 senior housing assets and our leasehold interest in the 53 triple-net properties described above,1 vacant land parcel for aggregate consideration of approximately $700$147.5 million, and we recognized a gain on the sale of these assets of $657.6 million, net of taxes.$26.0 million.


20162018 Activity


During the year ended December 31, 2016,2018, we sold 29 triple-net leased properties, one seniors7 senior housing communitycommunities included in our senior living operations reportable business segment, 5 triple-net leased properties, 11 MOBs and six MOBs2 vacant land parcels for aggregate consideration of $300.8$348.6 million.We recognized a gain on the salessale of these assets of $98.2$46.2 million net of taxes.for the year ended December 31, 2018.


2015 Activity

During 2015, we sold 39 triple-net leased properties and 26 MOBs for aggregate consideration of $541.0 million, including lease termination fees of $6.0 million, included within triple-net leased rental income in our Consolidated Statements of Income. We recognized a gain on the sales of these assets of $46.3 million, net of taxes, of which $27.4 million is being deferred due to one secured loan of $78.4 million and one non-mortgage loan of $20.0 million, we made to the buyers in connection with the sales of certain assets.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)


Assets Held for Sale


The table below summarizes our real estate assets classified as held for sale as of December 31, 20172020 and 2016,2019, including the amounts reported within other assets and accounts payable and other liabilities on our Consolidated Balance Sheets.
Sheets:
 December 31, 2017 December 31, 2016December 31, 2020December 31, 2019
 Number of Properties Held for Sale Assets Held for Sale Liabilities Held for Sale Number of Properties Held for Sale Assets Held for Sale Liabilities Held for SaleNumber of Properties Held for SaleAssets Held for SaleLiabilities Held for SaleNumber of Properties Held for SaleAssets Held for SaleLiabilities Held for Sale
 (Dollars in thousands)(Dollars in thousands)
Triple-net leased properties 
 $
 $
 
 $
 $
Triple-net leased properties$4,960 $2,690 $62,098 $1,623 
Office operations 8
 100,324
 61,202
 7
 53,151
 1,462
Senior living operations (1)
 
 
 
 
 1,810
 
Office operations (1)
Office operations (1)
15 101 5,177 499 
Senior living operationsSenior living operations4,633 455 18,252 3,102 
Total 8
 $100,324
 $61,202
 7
 $54,961
 $1,462
Total$9,608 $3,246 14 $85,527 $5,224 


(1)
Includes one vacant land parcel classified as held for sale as December 31, 2016, which was sold during 2017.

(1)Balances relate to anticipated post-closing settlements of working capital.

In September 2020, 1 senior housing community no longer met the criteria as being classified as held for sale. As a result, we adjusted the carrying amount of the asset by recognizing depreciation expense of $0.1 million and classified the asset within net real estate investments on our Consolidated Balance Sheets for all periods presented.

Real Estate Impairment


We recognized impairments of $37.5$153.8 million, $35.2$133.6 million and $42.2$29.5 million for the years ended December 31, 2017, 20162020, 2019 and 20152018, respectively, which are recorded primarily as a component of depreciation and amortization in our Consolidated Statements of Income. A significant portion of our 2020 charges resulted from the impact of COVID-19 and relate primarily to our triple-net leased properties reportable business segment. Our recorded impairmentsothers were primarily the result of a change in our intent to hold the impaired assets.assets (See “Note 1 – Description of Business - COVID-19 Update”). In most cases, we recognized an impairment in the periods in which our change in intent was made.


CCP Spin-Off

On August 17, 2015, we completed the CCP Spin-Off. In connection with the CCP Spin-Off, we disposed of 355 triple-net leased skilled nursing facilities and other healthcare assets operated by private regional and local care providers. The CCP Spin-Off was effectuated through a distribution of the common shares of CCP to holders of our common stock as of the distribution record date, and qualifiedThere were 0 impairments recorded as a tax-free distribution to our stockholders. For every four sharesresult of Ventas common stock held asnatural disasters for the years ended December 31, 2020 and 2019; however, we recognized impairments of the distribution record date of August 10, 2015, Ventas stockholders received one CCP common share on August 17, 2015. On August 17, 2015, just prior to the effective time of the spin-off, CCP (as our then wholly owned subsidiary) received approximately $1.4 billion of proceeds from a recently completed term loan and revolving credit facility. CCP paid us a distribution of $1.3 billion from these proceeds. We used this distribution from CCP to pay down our existing debt of $1.1 billion and to pay for a portion of our quarterly installment of dividends to our stockholders of $0.2 billion.

The historical results of operations of the CCP properties as well as the related assets and liabilities have been presented as discontinued operations in the consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive income. Discontinued operations also include separation costs incurred to complete the CCP Spin-Off of $42.3$52.5 million for the year ended December 31, 2015. Separation costs for 2015 include $3.5 million2018 as a result of stock-based compensation expense representing the incremental fair valuenatural disasters which are recorded as a component of previously vested stock-based compensation awards asother in our Consolidated Statements of the spin date. In addition, the assets and liabilities of CCP are presented separately from assets and liabilities from continuing operations in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets. The accompanying consolidated statements of cash flows include within operating, investing and financing cash flows those activities which related to our period of ownership of the CCP properties.Income.


97

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)



The following is a summary of the assets and liabilities of CCP at the CCP Spin-Off date:
 August 17, 2015
 (In thousands)
Assets 
Net real estate investments$2,588,255
Cash and cash equivalents1,749
Goodwill135,446
Assets held for sale7,610
Other assets15,089
Total assets2,748,149
  
Liabilities 
Accounts payable and other liabilities217,760
Liabilities related to assets held for sale985
Total liabilities218,745
  
Net assets$2,529,404
Summarized financial information for CCP discontinued operations for the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016 and 2015 respectively is as follows:
 2017 2016 2015
 (In thousands)
Revenues     
Rental income$
 $
 $196,848
Income from loans and investments
 
 2,148
Interest and other income
 
 63
 
 
 199,059
Expenses     
Interest
 
 61,613
Depreciation and amortization
 
 79,479
General, administrative and professional fees
 
 9
Merger-related expenses and deal costs110
 922
 46,402
Other
 
 1,332
 110
 922
 188,835
Net (loss) income from discontinued operations(110) (922) 10,224
Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests
 
 120
Net (loss) income from discontinued operations attributable to common stockholders$(110) $(922) $10,104
Capital and development project expenditures relating to CCP for the year ended December 31, 2015 were $21.8 million. Other than capital and development project expenditures there were no other significant non-cash operating or investing activities relating to CCP.

We and CCP entered into a transition services agreement prior to the CCP Spin-Off pursuant to which we and our subsidiaries provided to CCP, on an interim, transitional basis, various services. The services provided include information technology, accounting and tax services. The overall fee charged by us for such services (the "Service Fee") was $2.5 million for one year. We recognized income of $1.6 million and $0.9 million, for the years ended December 31, 2016 and 2015, respectively, relating to the Service Fee, which was payable in four quarterly installments. The transition services agreement terminated on August 31, 2016.


NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)


NOTE 6—6–LOANS RECEIVABLE AND INVESTMENTS

As of December 31, 20172020 and 2016,2019, we had $1.4$0.9 billion and $754.6 million,$1.0 billion, respectively, of net loans receivable and investments relating to seniorssenior housing and healthcare operators or properties. The following is a summary of our loans receivable and investments, net, as of December 31, 2017 and 2016, including amortized cost, fair value and unrealized gains or losses on available-for-saleavailable for sale investments:
Amortized CostAllowanceUnrealized GainCarrying AmountFair Value
(In thousands)
As of December 31, 2020:
Secured/mortgage loans and other, net$555,840 $$$555,840 $508,707 
Government-sponsored pooled loan investments, net(1)
55,154 (8,846)3,419 49,727 49,727 
Total investments reported as secured loans receivable and investments, net610,994 (8,846)3,419 605,567 558,434 
Non-mortgage loans receivable, net74,700 (17,623)57,077 57,009 
Marketable debt securities (2)
213,334 24,219 237,553 237,553 
Total loans receivable and investments, net$899,028 $(26,469)$27,638 $900,197 $852,996 
As of December 31, 2019:
Secured/mortgage loans and other, net$645,546 $$$645,546 $646,925 
Government-sponsored pooled loan investments, net(1)
52,178 6,888 59,066 59,066 
Total investments reported as secured loans receivable and investments, net697,724 6,888 704,612 705,991 
Non-mortgage loans receivable, net63,724 63,724 63,538 
Marketable debt securities (2)
213,062 24,298 237,360 237,360 
Total loans receivable and investments, net$974,510 $$31,186 $1,005,696 $1,006,889 
  Carrying Amount Amortized Cost Fair Value Unrealized Gain
  (In thousands)
As of December 31, 2017:        
Secured/mortgage loans and other $1,291,694
 $1,291,694
 $1,286,322
 $
Government-sponsored pooled loan investments(1)
 54,665
 53,863
 54,665
 802
Total investments reported as Secured loans receivable and investments, net 1,346,359
 1,345,557
 1,340,987
 802
         
Non-mortgage loans receivable, net 59,857
 59,857
 58,849
 
Total investments reported as Other assets 59,857
 59,857
 58,849
 
Total loans receivable and investments, net $1,406,216
 $1,405,414
 $1,399,836
 $802

(1)Investments in government-sponsored pool loans have contractual maturity dates in 2021 and 2023.
  Carrying Amount Amortized Cost Fair Value Unrealized Gain
  (In thousands)
As of December 31, 2016:        
Secured/mortgage loans and other $646,972
 $646,972
 $655,981
 $
Government-sponsored pooled loan investments(1)
 55,049
 53,810
 55,049
 1,239
Total investments reported as Secured loans receivable and investments, net 702,021
 700,782
 711,030
 1,239
         
Non-mortgage loans receivable, net 52,544
 52,544
 53,626
 
Total investments reported as Other assets 52,544

52,544

53,626


Total loans receivable and investments, net $754,565
 $753,326
 $764,656
 $1,239
(2)Investments in marketable debt securities have contractual maturity dates in 2024 and 2026.

(1)
Investments in government-sponsored pooled loans have contractual maturity dates in 2023.


20172020 Activity

During the year ended December 31, 2017,2020, we recognized $34.7 million in expense in establishing allowances on our loan and investment portfolio. See “Note 1 - Description Of Business - COVID-19 Update.” In December 2020, we received aggregate proceeds of $37.6$10.5 million for the partial prepayment and $35.5 million for the full repayment of previously reserved loans receivable, which resultedwas recorded within allowance on loans receivables and investments in total gainsour Consolidated Statements of $0.6 million.    Income.

In March 2017, we provided secured debt financing to a subsidiary of Ardent to facilitate Ardent’s acquisition of LHP Hospital Group, Inc., which included a $700.0 million term loan and a $60.0 million revolving line of credit feature (of which $28.0 million was outstanding at December 31, 2017). The LIBOR-based debt financing has a five-year term, a one-year lock out feature and a weighted average interest rate of approximately 9.3% as of December 31, 2017 and is guaranteed by Ardent’s parent company.

2016 Activity


During the year ended December 31, 2016,2020, we received aggregate proceeds of $309.0$106.1 million in finalfor the full repayment of three securedthe principal balances of various loans receivable with a weighted average interest rate of 8.3% that were due to mature between 2020 and partial2025, which resulted in total gains of $1.4 million.

In April 2020, we received as consideration $66 million of notes secured by equity pledges on real estate assets with an effective interest rate of 9.2% in connection with the termination of the Holiday Lease. See “Note 3 – Concentration of Credit Risk.”

In July 2020, we entered into a $45 million Note from Brookdale Senior Living in connection with certain revised Agreements, which is included above in Non-mortgage loans receivable, net. The Note has an initial interest rate of 9.0%, increasing 50 basis points per annum, and matures on December 31, 2025. In addition, Brookdale transferred fee ownership of 5 senior living communities to us, in full satisfaction and repayment of onea $78 million loan to Brookdale Senior Living from us that was secured by the five communities. See “Note 3 – Concentration of Credit Risk.”

98

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

2019 Activity

In April 2019, we purchased $5.0 million and $10.5 million of senior secured notes issued by a healthcare company which mature in 2024 and 2026, respectively. The 2024 and 2026 notes were purchased at a price of 102% and 98% of par, respectively, and have an effective interest rate of 8.1% and 8.3%, respectively. These marketable debt securities are classified as available for sale and are reflected on our Consolidated Balance Sheets at fair value.

In June 2019, we provided new secured debt financing of $490 million to certain subsidiaries of Colony Capital, Inc. The London Inter-bank Offered Rate (“LIBOR”) based debt financing has a five-year term (inclusive of 3 one-year extension options). In connection with this transaction, our previous secured loan receivableto certain subsidiaries of Colony Capital, Inc. of $282 million was paid in full and we recognized gainsa gain of $9.6$0.5 million on the repayment of these loans receivable that are recorded in income from loans and investments in our Consolidated Statements of Income forIncome.

In July 2019, we closed the year ended December 31, 2016.first phase of the LGM Acquisition by funding C$947 million (US $723 million) to LGM as a bridge loan to enable LGM to buy out its former partner. The bridge loan and all outstanding interest was fully repaid in September 2019 upon the closing of the LGM Acquisition. See “Note 4 – Acquisitions of Real Estate Property.”
    
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)


In February 2016, we made a $140.0 million secured mezzanine loan investment, at par, relating to Class A life sciences properties in California and Massachusetts, that has an annual interest rate of 9.95% and matures in 2021.

In September 2016, we acquired three non-mortgage loans receivable in connection with the Life Sciences Acquisition.


NOTE 7—7–INVESTMENTS IN UNCONSOLIDATED ENTITIES

We report investments in unconsolidated entities over whose operating and financial policies we have the ability to exercise significant influence under the equity method of accounting. We are not required to consolidate these entities because our joint venture partners have significant participating rights, nor are these entities considered VIEs, as they are controlled by equity holders with sufficient capital. AtWe invest in both real estate entities and operating entities which are described further below.

Investments in Unconsolidated Real Estate Entities

Through our newly formed Ventas Investment Management Platform, we partner with third-party institutional investors to invest in healthcare real estate through various joint ventures and other co-investment vehicles. Below is a summary of our investment in unconsolidated real estate entities as of December 31, 2017,2020 and 2019, respectively:

Carrying Amount
As of December 31,
Ownership(1)
20202019
(In thousands)
Investment in unconsolidated real estate entities:
Ventas Life Science & Healthcare Real Estate Fund22.9%$279,983 $
Pension Fund Joint Venture22.8%34,690 41,739 
Research & Innovation Development Joint Venture50.3%123,445 
Ventas Investment Management Platform438,118 41,739 
All other(2)
34.0%-50.0%5,570 3,283 
Total investment unconsolidated real estate entities$443,688 $45,022 
(1) The entities in which we have an ownership interest may have less than a 100% interest in the underlying real estate. The ownership percentages in the table reflect Ventas’ interest in the underlying real estate.
(2) Includes investments in land parcels, parking structures and other de minimis investments in unconsolidated real estate entities.

In March 2020, we had 25% ownership interestsformed the Ventas Fund, in joint ventures that ownedwhich we are the sponsor and general partner. See “Note 5 – Dispositions and Impairments.” In October 2020, the Ventas Fund acquired a portfolio of 3 life science properties in the South San Francisco life science cluster for $1.0 billion, which increased assets under management to $1.8 billion as of December 31, properties, excluding properties under development.2020. The acquisition was financed with a $415 million mortgage loan bearing interest at a fixed rate of 2.6% per annum.

99


In October 2020, we formed the R&I Development JV. See “Note 5 – Dispositions and Impairments.” We account forown an over 50% interest and GIC owns a 45% interest in the Initial R&I JV Projects. We act as manager of the R&I Develoment JV, with customary rights and obligations, and will receive customary fees and incentives. Our exclusive development partner, Wexford Science & Technology, remains the developer of, and a minority partner in, all of the projects. The R&I Development JV may be expanded in the future to include other pre-identified R&I development projects.

In March 2018, we recognized an impairment charge of $35.7 million relating to 1 of our interestsequity investments in an unconsolidated real estate joint ventures, as well as our 34% interestventure consisting principally of SNFs, which is recorded in Atria and 9.9% interestloss from unconsolidated entities in Ardent, which are included within other assets on our Consolidated Balance Sheets, underStatements of Income. We completed the equity method of accounting.
With the exceptionsale of our interests25% interest to our joint venture partner in AtriaJuly 2018 and Ardent, wereceived $57.5 million at closing.

We provide various services to eachour unconsolidated entityreal estate entities in exchange for fees and reimbursements. Total management fees earned in connection with these entitiesservices were $6.3 million, $6.7 million, $3.4 million and $7.8$5.8 million for the years ended December 31, 2017, 20162020, 2019 and 2015,2018, respectively, (whichwhich is included in office building and other services revenue in our Consolidated Statements of Income).Income.

Investments in Unconsolidated Operating Entities

We own investments in unconsolidated operating entities such as Ardent, Atria and Eclipse Senior Living, Inc. (“ESL”), which are included within other assets on our Consolidated Balance Sheets. Our 34% ownership interest in Atria entitles us to customary minority rights and protections, including the right to appoint 2 of 6 members to the Atria Board of Directors. Our 34% ownership interest in ESL entitles us to customary minority rights and protections, including the right to appoint 2 of 6 members to the ESL Board of Directors. ESL management owns the 66% controlling interest. Our 9.8% ownership interest in Ardent entitles us to customary minority rights and protections, as well as the right to appoint 1 of 11 members on the Ardent Board of Directors.

In October 2015,June 2020, as a result of COVID-19, we acquired the 95% controlling interestsrecognized an impairment charge of $10.7 million related to our investment in eight MOBs froman unconsolidated operating entity. See “Note 1 – Description of Business - COVID-19 Update.”

NOTE 8–INTANGIBLES

The following is a joint venture entity in which we had a 5% interest and that we accounted for as an equity method investment. In connection with this acquisition, we re-measured the fair valuesummary of our previously held equity interest and recognized a loss on re-measurement of $0.2 million, which is included in income from unconsolidated entities in our Consolidated Statements of Income.intangibles:

 As of December 31, 2020As of December 31, 2019
 BalanceRemaining
Weighted Average
Amortization
Period in Years
BalanceRemaining
Weighted Average
Amortization
Period in Years
 (Dollars in thousands)
Intangible assets:    
Above market lease intangibles$140,096 6.4$145,891 6.9
In-place and other lease intangibles1,090,790 10.71,162,187 10.6
Goodwill1,051,650 N/A1,051,161 N/A
Other intangibles35,870 10.035,837 10.9
Accumulated amortization(941,462)N/A(922,668)N/A
Net intangible assets$1,376,944 10.3$1,472,408 10.2
Intangible liabilities:   
Below market lease intangibles$339,265 14.3$349,357 14.5
Other lease intangibles13,498 N/A13,498 N/A
Accumulated amortization(212,655)N/A(203,834)N/A
Purchase option intangibles3,568 N/A3,568 N/A
Net intangible liabilities$143,676 14.3$162,589 14.5
In February 2017, we acquired the controlling interests in six triple-net leased seniors housing communities for a purchase price of $100.0 million. In connection with this acquisition, we re-measured the fair value of our previously held equity interest, resulting in a gain on re-measurement of $3.0 million, which is included in loss from unconsolidated entities in our Consolidated Statements of Income.

N/A—Not Applicable 
Since the above acquisitions, operations relating to these properties have been consolidated in our Consolidated Statements of Income.    

100

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)



NOTE 8—INTANGIBLES
The following is a summary of our intangibles as of December 31, 2017 and 2016:
 December 31, 2017 December 31, 2016
 Balance 
Remaining
Weighted Average
Amortization
Period in Years
 Balance 
Remaining
Weighted Average
Amortization
Period in Years
 (Dollars in thousands)
Intangible assets:       
Above market lease intangibles$184,775
 7.0 $184,993
 6.9
In-place and other lease intangibles1,353,220
 23.6 1,325,636
 23.6
Goodwill1,034,641
 N/A 1,033,225
 N/A
Other intangibles35,890
 12.3 35,783
 11.3
Accumulated amortization(861,452) N/A (769,558) N/A
Net intangible assets$1,747,074
 21.7 $1,810,079
 21.5
Intangible liabilities:       
Below market lease intangibles$359,099
 13.7 $345,103
 14.1
Other lease intangibles40,141
 40.8 40,843
 38.5
Accumulated amortization(160,965) N/A (133,468) N/A
Purchase option intangibles3,568
 N/A 3,568
 N/A
Net intangible liabilities$241,843
 15.6 $256,046
 15.9
N/A—Not Applicable 
Above marketAbove-market lease intangibles and in-place and other lease intangibles are included in acquired lease intangibles within real estate investments on our Consolidated Balance Sheets. Other intangibles (including non-compete agreements, trade names and trademarks) are included in other assets on our Consolidated Balance Sheets. Below market lease intangibles, other lease intangibles and purchase option intangibles are included in accounts payable and other liabilities on our Consolidated Balance Sheets. For the years ended December 31, 2017, 20162020, 2019 and 2015,2018, our net amortization related to these intangibles was $67.2$45.7 million, $104.5$59.2 million and $142.7$49.2 million,, respectively. The following is a summary of the estimated net amortization related to these intangibles for each of the next five years is as follows:
years:
 Estimated Net Amortization
 (In thousands)
2018$55,591
201946,137
202040,085
202137,180
202230,580
Estimated Net Amortization
(In thousands)
2021$50,421 
202242,787 
202331,343 
202416,932 
20258,977 

The table below reflects the carrying amount of goodwill, by segment, as of December 31, 2017:2020:
Goodwill
(In thousands)
Triple-net leased properties$322,270 
Senior living operations259,482 
Office operations469,898 
Total goodwill$1,051,650 
  Goodwill
  (In thousands)
Triple-net Leased Properties $305,261
Senior Living Operations 259,482
Office Operations 469,898
Total Goodwill $1,034,641

The $1.4 million increase in goodwill during the year ended December 31, 2017 is entirely the result of foreign currency translation in our triple-net leased properties reportable business segment.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)



NOTE 9—9–OTHER ASSETS

The following is a summary of our other assets as of December 31, 2017 and 2016:assets:
As of December 31,
20202019
 (In thousands)
Straight-line rent receivables$169,711 $278,833 
Non-mortgage loans receivable, net57,077 63,724 
Stock warrants50,098 
Marketable debt securities237,553 237,360 
Other intangibles, net4,659 5,149 
Investment in unconsolidated operating entities63,768 59,301 
Other224,363 233,349 
Total other assets$807,229 $877,716 

101
 2017 2016
 (In thousands)
Straight-line rent receivables, net$267,579
 $244,580
Non-mortgage loans receivable, net59,857
 52,544
Other intangibles, net6,496
 8,190
Investment in unconsolidated operating entities49,738
 28,431
Other189,275
 184,619
Total other assets$572,945
 $518,364


NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)



NOTE 10—10–SENIOR NOTES PAYABLE AND OTHER DEBT

The following is a summary of our senior notes payable and other debtdebt:
As of December 31,
20202019
 (In thousands)
Unsecured revolving credit facility (1)
$39,395 $120,787 
Commercial paper notes567,450 
Secured revolving construction credit facility due 2022154,098 160,492 
Floating Rate Senior Notes, Series F due 2021 (2)
235,664 231,018 
3.25% Senior Notes due 2022263,687 500,000 
3.30% Senior Notes, Series C due 2022 (2)
196,386 192,515 
Unsecured term loan due 2023200,000 200,000 
3.125% Senior Notes due 2023400,000 400,000 
3.10% Senior Notes due 2023400,000 400,000 
2.55% Senior Notes, Series D due 2023 (2)
216,025 211,767 
3.50% Senior Notes due 2024400,000 400,000 
3.75% Senior Notes due 2024400,000 400,000 
4.125% Senior Notes, Series B due 2024 (2)
196,386 192,515 
2.80% Senior Notes, Series E due 2024 (2)
471,328 462,036 
Unsecured term loan due 2025 (2)
392,773 385,030 
3.50% Senior Notes due 2025600,000 600,000 
2.65% Senior Notes due 2025450,000 450,000 
4.125% Senior Notes due 2026500,000 500,000 
3.25% Senior Notes due 2026450,000 450,000 
3.85% Senior Notes due 2027400,000 400,000 
4.00% Senior Notes due 2028650,000 650,000 
4.40% Senior Notes due 2029750,000 750,000 
3.00% Senior Notes due 2030650,000 650,000 
4.75% Senior Notes due 2030500,000 
6.90% Senior Notes due 203752,400 52,400 
6.59% Senior Notes due 203822,823 22,823 
5.70% Senior Notes due 2043300,000 300,000 
4.375% Senior Notes due 2045300,000 300,000 
4.875% Senior Notes due 2049300,000 300,000 
Mortgage loans and other2,092,106 1,996,969 
Total11,983,071 12,245,802 
Deferred financing costs, net(68,343)(79,939)
Unamortized fair value adjustment12,618 20,056 
Unamortized discounts(31,934)(27,146)
Senior notes payable and other debt$11,895,412 $12,158,773 

(1)As of December 31, 2020 and 2019, respectively, $12.2 million and $26.2 million of aggregate borrowings were denominated in Canadian dollars. Aggregate borrowings of $27.2 million and $27.6 million were denominated in British pounds as of December 31, 20172020 and 2016:2019, respectively.
(2)Canadian Dollar debt obligations shown in US Dollars.
102
 2017 2016
 (In thousands)
Unsecured revolving credit facility (1)
$535,832
 $146,538
Secured revolving construction credit facility due 20222,868
 
1.250% Senior Notes due 2017
 300,000
2.00% Senior Notes due 2018700,000
 700,000
Unsecured term loan due 2018 (2)

 200,000
Unsecured term loan due 2019 (2)

 371,215
4.00% Senior Notes due 2019600,000
 600,000
3.00% Senior Notes, Series A due 2019 (3)
318,041
 297,841
2.700% Senior Notes due 2020500,000
 500,000
Unsecured term loan due 2020900,000
 900,000
4.750% Senior Notes due 2021700,000
 700,000
4.25% Senior Notes due 2022600,000
 600,000
3.25% Senior Notes due 2022500,000
 500,000
3.300% Senior Notes, Series C due 2022 (3)
198,776
 186,150
3.125% Senior Notes due 2023400,000
 400,000
3.100% Senior Notes due 2023400,000
 
2.55% Senior Notes, Series D due 2023 (3)
218,653
 
3.750% Senior Notes due 2024400,000
 400,000
4.125% Senior Notes, Series B due 2024 (3)
198,776
 186,150
3.500% Senior Notes due 2025600,000
 600,000
4.125% Senior Notes due 2026500,000
 500,000
3.25% Senior Notes due 2026450,000
 450,000
3.850% Senior Notes due 2027400,000
 
6.90% Senior Notes due 203752,400
 52,400
6.59% Senior Notes due 203822,973
 22,973
5.45% Senior Notes due 2043258,750
 258,750
5.70% Senior Notes due 2043300,000
 300,000
4.375% Senior Notes due 2045300,000
 300,000
Mortgage loans and other1,308,564
 1,718,897
Total11,365,633
 11,190,914
Deferred financing costs, net(73,093) (61,304)
Unamortized fair value adjustment12,139
 25,224
Unamortized discounts(28,617) (27,508)
Senior notes payable and other debt$11,276,062
 $11,127,326

(1)
As of December 31, 2017 and 2016, respectively, $28.7 million and $146.5 million of aggregate borrowings were denominated in Canadian dollars. Aggregate borrowings of $31.1 million were denominated in British pounds as of December 31, 2017. There were no aggregate borrowings denominated in British pounds as of December 31, 2016.
(2)
As of December 31, 2016, there was $571.2 million of unsecured term loan borrowings under our unsecured credit facility, of which $92.6 million was in the form of Canadian dollars. In August 2017, we repaid the balances then outstanding on the term loans.
(3)
These borrowings are in the form of Canadian dollars.


NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)



Credit Facilities, Commercial Paper and Unsecured Term Loans


In April 2017, we entered into anAs of December 31, 2020, our unsecured credit facility was comprised of a $3.0 billion unsecured revolving credit facility priced at LIBOR plus 0.875%, that replaced our previous $2.0 based on the Company’s debt ratings, which was scheduled to mature in 2021. Following December 31, 2020, we entered into an amended and restated unsecured credit facility (the “New Credit Facility”) comprised of a $2.75 billion unsecured revolving credit facility initially priced at LIBOR plus 1.0%. The new unsecured credit facility was also comprised of our $200.0 million term loan that was scheduled to mature in 2018 and our $278.6 million term loan that was scheduled to mature in 2019. The 2018 and 2019 term loans were priced at LIBOR plus 1.05%. In August 2017, we used most of the proceeds from the sale of 22 SNFs to repay the balances then outstanding0.825% based on the 2018 and 2019 term loans, and recognized a loss on extinguishment ofCompany’s debt of $0.5 million. See "NOTE 5—DISPOSITIONS”.    

ratings. The unsecured revolving credit facilityNew Credit Facility matures in 2021,2025, but may be extended at our option subject to the satisfaction of certain conditions, for two2 additional periods of six months each. The unsecured revolving credit facilityNew Credit Facility also includes an accordion feature that permits us to increase our aggregate borrowing capacity thereunder to up to $3.75 billion.


Our unsecured credit facility imposesimposed certain customary restrictions on us, including restrictions pertaining to: (i) liens; (ii) investments; (iii) the incurrence of additional indebtedness; (iv) mergers and dissolutions; (v) certain dividend, distribution and other payments; (vi) permitted businesses; (vii) transactions with affiliates; (viii) agreements limiting certain liens; and (ix) the maintenance of certain consolidated total leverage, secured debt leverage, unsecured debt leverage and fixed charge coverage ratios and minimum consolidated adjusted net worth, and contains customary events of default. The New Credit Facility imposes similar restrictions.


As of December 31, 2017, we had $535.82020, $39.4 million of borrowingswas outstanding $14.5 million of letters of credit outstanding and $2.4 billion of unused borrowing capacity available under ourthe unsecured revolving credit facility.    facility with an additional $24.9 million restricted to support outstanding letters of credit. In addition, we limit our utilization of the unsecured revolving credit facility, to the extent necessary, to support our commercial paper program when commercial paper notes are outstanding. We had $2.9 billion in available liquidity under the unsecured revolving credit facility as of December 31, 2020. In connection with the New Credit Facility, we paid off all amounts outstanding under the existing unsecured revolving credit facility as of January 29, 2021 by drawing down the same amount under the New Credit Facility.


Our wholly owned subsidiary, Ventas Realty, Limited Partnership (“Ventas Realty”), may issue from time to time unsecured commercial paper notes up to a maximum aggregate amount outstanding at any time of $1.0 billion. The notes are sold under customary terms in the United States commercial paper note market and are ranked pari passu with all of Ventas Realty’s other unsecured senior indebtedness. The notes are fully and unconditionally guaranteed by Ventas, Inc. As of December 31, 2020, we had 0 borrowings outstanding under our commercial paper program.

As of December 31, 2017,2020, we also had a $900.0$200.0 million unsecured term loan due 2020 priced at LIBOR plus 0.975%.0.90% that matures in 2023.  The term loan also includes an accordion feature that effectively permits us to increase our aggregate borrowings thereunder to up to $800.0 million.        


In September 2017,As of December 31, 2020, we entered intohad a new $400.0 million secured revolving construction credit facility whichwith $154.1 million of borrowings outstanding. The secured revolving construction credit facility matures in 2022 and will beis primarily used to finance life sciencethe development of research and innovation centercenters and other construction projects. As of December 31, 2017, there were $2.9

In September 2019, we entered into a new C$500 million unsecured term loan facility priced at Canadian Dollar Offered Rate (“CDOR”) plus 0.90% that matures in 2025.

In June 2019, we repaid $100.0 million of borrowingsthe balance outstanding underon the secured revolving construction credit facility.$300.0 million unsecured term loan that matures in 2023 and repaid in full the $600.0 million unsecured term loan that was set to mature in 2024 and, as a result, we recognized a non-cash charge to loss on extinguishment of debt of $3.2 million during the second quarter of 2019.


Senior Notes


As of December 31, 2017,2020, we had outstanding $7.6$7.7 billion aggregate principal amount of senior notes issued by our subsidiary, Ventas Realty Limited Partnership (“Ventas Realty”) ($3.9 billion263.7 million of which was co-issued by Ventas Realty’s wholly owned subsidiary, Ventas Capital Corporation), approximately $75.4$75.2 million aggregate principal amount of senior notes issued by Nationwide Health Properties, Inc. (“NHP”) and assumed by our subsidiary, Nationwide Health Properties, LLC (“NHP LLC”), as successor to NHP, in connection with our acquisition of NHP, and C$1.21.7 billion aggregate principal amount of senior notes issued by our subsidiary, Ventas Canada Finance Limited.Limited (“Ventas Canada”). All of the senior notes issued by Ventas Realty and Ventas Canada Finance Limited are unconditionally guaranteed by Ventas, Inc.

In May 2016, Ventas Realty issued and sold $400.0 million aggregate principal amount of 3.125% senior notes due 2023 at a public offering price equal to 99.343% of par, for total proceeds of $397.4 million before the underwriting discount and expenses.

In June 2016, we redeemed $455.5 million aggregate principal amount then outstanding of our 1.55% senior notes due September 2016 at a public offering price of 100.335% of par, plus accrued and unpaid interest to the redemption date, and recognized a loss on extinguishment of debt of $2.1 million. The redemption was funded using proceeds from our May 2016 senior note issuance, cash on hand and borrowings under our unsecured revolving credit facility. In July 2016, we repaid the remaining balance then outstanding of our 1.55% senior notes due September 2016 of $94.5 million and recognized a loss on extinguishment of debt of $0.3 million.

In September 2016, Ventas Realty issued and sold $450.0 million aggregate principal amount of 3.25% senior notes due 2026 at a public offering price equal to 99.811% of par, for total proceeds of $449.1 million before the underwriting discount and expenses.

In March 2017, Ventas Realty issued and sold $400.0 million aggregate principal amount of 3.100% senior notes due 2023 at a public offering price equal to 99.280% of par, for total proceeds of $397.1 million before the underwriting discount and expenses, and $400.0 million aggregate principal amount of 3.850% senior notes due 2027 at a public offering price equal to 99.196% of par, for total proceeds of $396.8 million before the underwriting discount and expenses.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)


In April 2017, we repaid in full, at par, $300.0 million aggregate principal amount then outstanding of our 1.250% senior notes due 2017 upon maturity.

In June 2017, Ventas Canada Finance Limited issued and sold C$275.0 million aggregate principal amount of 2.55% senior notes, Series D due 2023 at a price equal to 99.954% of par, for total proceeds of C$274.9 million before the agent fees and expenses. The notes were offered on a private placement basis in Canada. We used part of the proceeds to repay C$124.4 million on our unsecured term loan due 2019.


Ventas Realty’s senior notes are part of our and Ventas Realty’s general unsecured obligations, ranking equal in right of payment with all of our and Ventas Realty’s existing and future senior obligations and ranking senior in right of payment to all of our and Ventas Realty’s existing and future subordinated indebtedness. However, Ventas Realty’s senior notes are effectively subordinated to our and Ventas Realty’s secured indebtedness, if any, to the extent of the value of the assets securing
103

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

that indebtedness. Ventas Realty’s senior notes are also structurally subordinated to the preferred equity and indebtedness, whether secured or unsecured, of our subsidiaries (other than Ventas Realty and, with respect to those senior notes co-issued by Ventas Capital Corporation, Ventas Capital Corporation).


Ventas Canada Finance Limited’sCanada’s senior notes are part of our and Ventas Canada Finance Limited’sCanada’s general unsecured obligations, ranking equal in right of payment with all of Ventas Canada Finance Limited’sCanada’s existing and future subordinated indebtedness. However, Ventas Canada Finance Limited’sCanada’s senior notes are effectively subordinated to our and Ventas Canada Finance Limited’sCanada’s secured indebtedness, if any, to the extent of the value of the assets securing that indebtedness. Ventas Canada Finance Limited’sCanada’s senior notes are also structurally subordinated to the preferred equity and indebtedness, whether secured or unsecured, of our subsidiaries (other than Ventas Canada Finance Limited)Canada).


NHP LLC’s senior notes are part of NHP LLC’s general unsecured obligations, ranking equal in right of payment with all of NHP LLC’s existing and future senior obligations and ranking senior to all of NHP LLC’s existing and future subordinated indebtedness. However, NHP LLC’s senior notes are effectively subordinated to NHP LLC’s secured indebtedness, if any, to the extent of the value of the assets securing that indebtedness. NHP LLC’s senior notes are also structurally subordinated to the preferred equity and indebtedness, whether secured or unsecured, of its subsidiaries.


Ventas Realty and Ventas Canada Finance Limited and NHP LLC may redeem each series of their respective senior notes (other than NHP LLC’s 6.90% senior notes due 2037 and 6.59% senior notes due 2038), in whole at any time or in part from time to time, prior to maturity at the redemption prices set forth in the applicable indenture (which include, in many instances, a make-whole premium), plus, in each case, accrued and unpaid interest thereon to the redemption date.


NHP LLC’s 6.90% senior notes due 2037 are subject to repurchase at the option of the holders, at par, on October 1, 2027, and its 6.59% senior notes due 2038 are subject to repurchase at the option of the holders, at par, on July 7 in each of 2018, 2023 and 2028.


2021 Senior Notes Activity

In February 2021, in order to reduce near-term maturities, we issued a make whole redemption for the entirety of the $400 million outstanding aggregate principal amount of 3.10% senior notes due January 2023. The redemption is expected to settle in March 2021 and will be funded primarily with cash on hand.

2020 Senior Notes Activity

In April 2020, Ventas Realty issued and sold $500.0 million aggregate principal amount of 4.75% senior notes due 2030 at an amount equal to 97.86% of par.

In October 2020, we redeemed, pursuant to a cash tender offer, $236.3 million aggregate principal amount then outstanding of our 3.25% senior notes due 2022 at 104.14% of par value, plus accrued and unpaid interest to the payment date. As a result, we recognized a loss on extinguishment of debt of $11.1 million during the year ended December 31, 2020.

2019 Senior Notes Activity

In January 2019, we redeemed $258.8 million aggregate principal amount then outstanding of our 5.45% senior notes due 2043 at a public offering price at par, plus accrued and unpaid interest to the redemption date. Notice of the redemption was given in November 2018 and, as a result, we recognized a non-cash charge to loss on extinguishment of debt of $7.1 million during the year ended December 31, 2018 and $0.4 million during the first quarter of 2019.

In February 2019, Ventas Realty issued and sold $400.0 million aggregate principal amount of 3.50% senior notes due 2024 at a public offering price equal to 99.88% of par and $300.0 million aggregate principal amount of 4.875% senior notes due 2049 at a public offering price equal to 99.77% of par.

In June 2019, Ventas Realty issued $450.0 million aggregate principal amount of 2.65% senior notes due 2025 at a public offering price equal to 99.45% of par. The notes were settled and proceeds were received in July 2019.

In July 2019, in connection with an announced cash tender offer for such notes, we tendered $397.1 million principal amount then outstanding of our 2.70% senior notes due 2020 for a tender offer consideration of 100.37% of par value, plus accrued and unpaid interest to the payment date. In August 2019, we repaid the remaining balance then outstanding of our 2.70% senior notes due 2020 of $102.9 million. As a result of the redemption and repayment, we recognized a total loss on extinguishment of debt of $2.4 million.

104

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

In August 2019, Ventas Realty issued and sold $650.0 million aggregate principal amount of 3.00% senior notes due 2030 at a public offering price equal to 99.51% of par.

In August 2019, in connection with an announced cash tender offer for such notes, we tendered $395.7 million principal amount then outstanding of our 4.25% senior notes due 2022 for a tender offer consideration of 105.46% of par value, plus accrued and unpaid interest to the payment date. In September 2019, we repaid the remaining balance then outstanding of our 4.25% senior notes due 2022 of $204.3 million. As a result of the redemption and repayment, we recognized a loss on extinguishment of debt of $35.9 million.
In September 2019, we repaid in full, at par, C$400.0 million principal amount then outstanding of our 3.00% senior notes, Series A due 2019 upon maturity.

In November 2019, Ventas Canada issued and sold C$600 million aggregate principal amount of 2.80% senior notes, Series E due 2024 and C$300 million aggregate principal amount of floating rate senior notes, Series F due 2021, at a public offering price equal to 99.99% and 100.00%, respectively, of par.
Mortgages


At December 31, 2017,2020, we had 8889 mortgage loans outstanding in the aggregate principal amount of $1.3$2.1 billion andwhich is secured by 8878 of our properties. Of these loans, 7766 loans in the aggregate principal amount of $1.0$1.4 billion bear interest at fixed rates ranging from 3.0%1.5% to 8.6%13.0% per annum, and 1123 loans in the aggregate principal amount of $298.0$702.9 million bear interest at variable rates ranging from 1.1%0.1% to 4.6%2.9% per annum as of December 31, 2017.2020. At December 31, 2017,2020, the weighted average annual rate on our fixed rate mortgage loans was 5.2%3.5%, and the weighted average annual rate on our variable rate mortgage loans was 2.9%1.9%. Our mortgage loans had a weighted average maturity of 5.53.9 years as of December 31, 2017.2020.


During the years ended December 31, 2017, 20162020 and 2015,2019, we repaid in full mortgage loans in the aggregate principal amount of $411.4 million, $337.8$60.9 million and $461.9$97.7 million, respectively.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)In September 2019, we assumed C$1.2 billion mortgage debt (included in the $2.1 billion above), including a fair value premium of C$16.6 million, in connection with the LGM Acquisition. See “Note 4 – Acquisitions of Real Estate Property.”


Scheduled Maturities of Borrowing Arrangements and Other Provisions


AsThe following summarizes the maturities of our senior notes payable and other debt as of December 31, 2017,2020:
Principal Amount
Due at Maturity
Unsecured Revolving
Credit
Facility and Commercial Paper Notes (1)
Scheduled Periodic
Amortization
Total Maturities
 (In thousands)
2021$511,971 $39,395 $44,651 $596,017 
20221,070,861 38,602 1,109,463 
20231,609,373 24,821 1,634,194 
20241,610,581 18,587 1,629,168 
20251,619,872 14,894 1,634,766 
Thereafter5,285,913 93,550 5,379,463 
Total maturities$11,708,571 $39,395 $235,105 $11,983,071 

(1)At December 31, 2020, we had unrestricted cash and cash equivalents of $413.3 million, which exceeds the borrowings outstanding under our indebtedness had the following maturities:
unsecured revolving credit facility and commercial paper program.
 
Principal Amount
Due at Maturity
 
Unsecured Revolving
Credit
Facility (1)
 
Scheduled Periodic
Amortization
 Total Maturities
 (In thousands)
2018$785,871
 $
 $21,576
 $807,447
20191,330,572
 
 15,759
 1,346,331
20201,451,587
 
 12,910
 1,464,497
2021772,838
 535,832
 11,505
 1,320,175
20221,419,392
 
 9,878
 1,429,270
Thereafter (2)
4,910,954
 
 86,959
 4,997,913
Total maturities$10,671,214
 $535,832
 $158,587
 $11,365,633

(1)
At December 31, 2017, we had $81.4 million of unrestricted cash and cash equivalents, for $454.5 million of net borrowings outstanding under our unsecured revolving credit facility.
(2)
Includes $52.4 million aggregate principal amount of 6.90% senior notes due 2037 that is subject to repurchase, at the option of the holders, on October 1, 2027, and $23.0 million aggregate principal amount of 6.59% senior notes due 2038 that is subject to repurchase, at the option of the holders, on July 7 in each of 2018, 2023 and 2028.
    
The instruments governing our outstanding indebtedness contain covenants that limit our ability and the ability of certain of our subsidiaries to, among other things: (i) incur debt; (ii) make certain dividends, distributions and investments; (iii) enter into certain transactions; and/or (iv) merge, consolidate or sell certain assets. Ventas Realty’s and Ventas Canada Finance Limited’sCanada’s senior notes also require us and our subsidiaries to maintain total unencumbered assets of at least 150% of our unsecured debt.
105

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

Our credit facilities also require us to maintain certain financial covenants pertaining to, among other things, our consolidated total leverage, secured debt, unsecured debt, fixed charge coverage and net worth.


As of December 31, 2017,2020, we were in compliance with all of these covenants.


Derivatives and Hedging


In the normal course of our business, interest rate fluctuations affect future cash flows under our variable rate debt obligations, loans receivable and marketable debt securities, and foreign currency exchange rate fluctuations affect our operating results. We follow established risk management policies and procedures, including the use of derivative instruments, to mitigate the impact of these risks.


For interest rate exposures, we use derivatives primarily to fix the rate on our variable rate debt and to manage our borrowing costs. We do not use derivative instruments for trading or speculative purposes, and we have a policy of entering into contracts only with major financial institutions based upon their credit ratings and other factors. When considered together with the underlying exposure that the derivative is designed to hedge, we do not expect that the use of derivatives in this manner would have any material adverse effect on our future financial condition or results of operations.


As of December 31, 2017,2020, our variable rate debt obligations of $1.9$1.5 billion reflect, in part, the effect of $549.9$146.7 million notional amount of interest rate swaps with maturities ranging from March 20182022 to January 2023May 2022 that effectively convert fixed rate debt to variable rate debt. As of December 31, 2017,2020, our fixed rate debt obligations of $9.4$10.5 billion reflect, in part, the effect of $250.9$305.9 million and C$145.7 million notional amount of interest rate swaps with maturities ranging from October 2018January 2023 to September 2027,December 2029, in each case that effectively convert variable rate debt to fixed rate debt.


In February 2016, we entered into a $200 million notional amount interest rate swap with a maturity of August 3, 2020 that effectively converts LIBOR-based floating rate debt to fixed rate debt, setting LIBOR at 1.132% through the maturity date of the swap.

In July 2016, we entered into $225 million notional forward starting swaps that reduced our exposure to fluctuations in interest rates between July and the September issuance of 3.25% senior notes due 2026. On the issuance date, we realized a gain of $1.9 million from these swaps that is being recognized over the life of the notes using an effective interest method.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)


In January and February 2017, we entered into a total of $275 million of notional forward starting swaps with an effective date of April 3, 2017 that reduced our exposure to fluctuations in interest rates related to changes in rates between the trade dates of the swaps and the forecasted issuance of long-term debt. The rate on the notional amounts was locked at a weighted average rate of 2.33%. In March 2017, these swaps were terminated in conjunction with the issuance of the 3.850% senior notes due 2027, which resulted in a $0.8 million gain that is being recognized over the life of the notes using the effective interest method.

In March 2017, we entered into interest rate swaps totaling a notional amount of $400 million with a maturity of January 15, 2023, effectively converting fixed rate debt to three month LIBOR-based floating rate debt.  As a result, we will receive a fixed rate on the swap of 3.10% and will pay a floating rate equal to three month LIBOR plus a weighted average swap spread of 0.98%.

In June 2017, we entered into a total of $125 million of notional forward starting swaps with an effective date of January 15, 2018 and a maturity of January 15, 2028, that reduced our exposure to fluctuations in interest rates related to changes in rates between the trade dates of the swaps and the forecasted issuance of long-term debt. The rate on the notional amounts was locked at a weighted average rate of 2.1832%.

In December 2017, we entered into a total of $75 million of notional forward starting swaps with an effective date of February 15, 2018 and a maturity of February 15, 2028, that reduced our exposure to fluctuations in interest rates related to changes in rates between the trade dates of the swaps and the forecasted issuance of long-term debt.  The rate on the notional amounts was locked at a weighted average rate of 2.3705%.

Unamortized Fair Value Adjustment

As of December 31, 2017, the unamortized fair value adjustment related to the long-term debt we assumed in connection with various acquisitions was $12.1 million and will be recognized as effective yield adjustments over the remaining terms of the instruments. The estimated aggregate amortization of the fair value adjustment related to long-term debt, which is reflected as a reduction of interest expense, was $5.8 million for the year ended December 31, 2017. For each of the next five years the estimated aggregate amortization of the fair value adjustment will be as follows:
 Estimated Aggregate Amortization
 (In thousands)
2018$2,821
20192,105
20201,664
20211,058
2022646




NOTE 11—11–FAIR VALUES OF FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS
As of December 31, 2017 and 2016, the
The carrying amounts and fair values of our financial instruments were as follows:
2017 2016 As of December 31, 2020As of December 31, 2019
Carrying
Amount
 Fair Value 
Carrying
Amount
 Fair Value Carrying
Amount
Fair ValueCarrying
Amount
Fair Value
(In thousands) (In thousands)
Assets:       Assets:    
Cash and cash equivalents$81,355
 $81,355
 $286,707
 $286,707
Cash and cash equivalents$413,327 $413,327 $106,363 $106,363 
Escrow deposits and restricted cashEscrow deposits and restricted cash38,313 38,313 39,739 39,739 
Stock warrantsStock warrants50,098 50,098 
Secured mortgage loans and other, net1,291,694
 1,286,322
 646,972
 655,981
Secured mortgage loans and other, net555,840 508,707 645,546 646,925 
Non-mortgage loans receivable, net59,857
 58,849
 52,544
 53,626
Non-mortgage loans receivable, net57,077 57,009 63,724 63,538 
Government-sponsored pooled loan investments54,665
 54,665
 55,049
 55,049
Marketable debt securitiesMarketable debt securities237,553 237,553 237,360 237,360 
Government-sponsored pooled loan investments, netGovernment-sponsored pooled loan investments, net49,727 49,727 59,066 59,066 
Derivative instruments7,248
 7,248
 3,302
 3,302
Derivative instruments738 738 
Liabilities:       Liabilities:
Senior notes payable and other debt, gross11,365,633
 11,600,750
 11,190,914
 11,369,440
Senior notes payable and other debt, gross11,983,071 13,075,337 12,245,802 12,778,758 
Derivative instruments5,435
 5,435
 2,316
 2,316
Derivative instruments28,338 28,338 12,987 12,987 
Redeemable OP Unitholder Interests146,252
 146,252
 177,177
 177,177
Redeemable OP UnitsRedeemable OP Units145,983 145,983 171,178 171,178 
For a discussion of the assumptions considered, refer to “NOTE 2—ACCOUNTING POLICIES.“Note 2 – Accounting Policies.” The use of different market assumptions and estimation methodologies may have a material effect on the reported estimated fair value amounts. Accordingly, the estimates presented above are not necessarily indicative of the amounts we would realize in a current market exchange.



NOTE 12—12–STOCK- BASED COMPENSATION

Compensation Plans

We currently have: four3 plans under which outstanding options to purchase common stock, shares of restricted stock or restricted stock units have been, or may in the future be, granted to our officers, employees and non-employee directors (the 2000 Incentive Compensation Plan (Employee Plan), the
106

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

2006 Incentive Plan, the 2006 Stock Plan for Directors, and the 2012 Incentive Plan); one1 plan under which executive officers may receive deferred common stock in lieu of compensation (the Executive Deferred Stock Compensation Plan); and one1 plan under which certain non-employee directors have received or may receive deferred common stock in lieu of director fees (the Nonemployee Directors’ Deferred Stock Compensation Plan). These plans are referred to collectively as the “Plans.”

During the year ended December 31, 2017,2020, we were permitted to issue shares and grant options, restricted stock and restricted stock units only under the Executive Deferred Stock Compensation Plan, the Nonemployee Directors’ Deferred Stock Compensation Plan and the 2012 Incentive Plan. The 2006 Incentive Plan and the 2006 Stock Plan for Directors (collectively, the “2006 Plans”) expired on December 31, 2012, and no0 additional grants were permitted under those Plans after that date.

The number of shares initially reserved for issuance and the number of shares available for future grants or issuance under these Plans as of December 31, 20172020 were as follows:

Executive Deferred Stock Compensation Plan—0.6 million shares were reserved initially for issuance to our executive officers in lieu of the payment of all or a portion of their salary, at their option, and 0.6 million shares were available for future issuance as of December 31, 2017.2020.

Nonemployee Directors’ Deferred Stock Compensation Plan—0.6 million shares were reserved initially for issuance to nonemployee directors in lieu of the payment of all or a portion of their retainer and meeting fees, at their option, and 0.50.4 million shares were available for future issuance as of December 31, 2017.2020.

2012 Incentive Plan—10.510.7 million shares (plus the number of shares or options outstanding under the 2006 Plans as of December 31, 2012 that were or are subsequently forfeited or expire unexercised) were reserved initially for grants or issuance to employees and non-employee directors, and 4.12.7 million shares (plus the number of shares or options outstanding under the 2006 Plans as of December 31, 20172020 that were or are subsequently forfeited or expire unexercised) were available for future issuance as of December 31, 2017.2020.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)


Outstanding options issued under the Plans are exercisable at the market price on the date of grant, expire ten years from the date of grant, and vest or have vested over periods of two or three years. If provided in the applicable Plan or award agreement, the vesting of stock options may accelerate upon a change of control (as defined in the applicable Plan) of Ventas, Inc. and other specified events.
On January 18, 2017, the Executive Compensation Committee (the “Compensation Committee”) of our Board of Directors approved a 2017 long-term incentive compensation program for our named executive officers (the “2017 LTIP”) pursuant to the 2012 Incentive Plan. Several changes were made covering 2017, including: (1) in prior years, long-term incentive compensation awards were granted following and based on the satisfaction of specified performance goals (i.e., “retrospective”), and in 2017, performance-based awards made pursuant to the 2017 LTIP generally will be earned at a higher or lower level based on future performance (i.e., “prospective”); and (2) certain transition awards and modified vesting provisions apply. Under the 2017 LTIP, the aggregate target award value for each named executive officer is allocated such that 60% of the value is performance-based, in the form of performance-based restricted stock units, and 40% of the value is in the form of time-based restricted stock units. The Compensation Committee eliminated qualitative or discretionary goals from the 2017 LTIP, which previously comprised 50% of the award opportunity.


Stock Options
In determining the estimated fair value of our stock options as of the date of grant, we used the Black-Scholes option pricing model with the following assumptions:

 2017 2016 2015
Risk-free interest rate1.69-1.87%
 0.93-1.27%
 1.02 - 1.38%
Dividend yield6.00% 5.50% 5.00%
Volatility factors of the expected market price for our common stock21.5-21.6%
 19.1-20.6%
 19.0 - 20.0%
Weighted average expected life of options4.0 years
 4.0 years
 4.0 years
The following is a summary of stock option activity in 2017:
2020:
Shares (000’s)Weighted Average
Exercise Price
Weighted
Average
Remaining
Contractual
Life (years)
Intrinsic
Value
($000’s)
Shares (000’s) 
Weighted Average
Exercise Price
 
Weighted
Average
Remaining
Contractual
Life (years)
 
Intrinsic
Value
($000’s)
Outstanding as of December 31, 20163,805
 $56.05
    
Outstanding as of December 31, 2019Outstanding as of December 31, 20194,077 $60.49   
Options granted1,626
 61.93
    
Options granted  
Options exercised(349) 46.70
    
Options exercised(111)45.75   
Options forfeited(57) 58.87
  Options forfeited(9)60.50 
Outstanding as of December 31, 20175,025
 58.57
 7.2 $19,522
Exercisable as of December 31, 20173,407
 $57.01
 6.5 $18,602
Options expiredOptions expired(3)60.50 
Outstanding as of December 31, 2020Outstanding as of December 31, 20203,954 60.90 4.8$462 
Exercisable as of December 31, 2020Exercisable as of December 31, 20203,954 60.90 4.8$462 

Compensation costs for all share-based awards are based on the grant date fair value and are recognized on a straight-line basis during the requisite service periods, with charges recorded in general, administrative and administrative expenses.professional fees. As of December 31, 2020 there was 0 unrecognized compensation expense relating to stock options. Compensation costs related to stock options for the years ended December 31, 2017, 20162019 and 20152018 were $4.8$0.3 million, $6.2 and $2.6 million, and $4.2 million, respectively.
As of December 31, 2017, we had $2.9 million of total unrecognized compensation cost related to non-vested stock options granted under the Plans. We expect to recognize that cost over a weighted average period of 1.20 years.
The weighted average grant date fair value per share of options issued during the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016 and 2015 was $5.23, $4.73 and $5.89, respectively.
Aggregate proceeds received from options exercised under the Plans for the years ended December 31, 2017, 20162020, 2019 and 20152018 were $16.3$5.1 million, $20.4$36.1 million and $6.4$8.8 million, respectively. The total intrinsic value at exercise of options exercised during the years ended December 31, 2017, 20162020, 2019 and 20152018 was $7.0$1.3 million, $8.0$12.3 million and $4.7$3.1 million, respectively. There was no0 deferred income tax benefit for stock options exercised.

107

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)




Restricted Stock and Restricted Stock Units


We recognize the fair value of shares of restricted stock and restricted stock units (including time-based and performance-based awards) on the grant date of the award as stock-based compensation expense over the requisite service period, with charges to general, administrative and administrative expensesprofessional fees of $21.7$21.4 million,, $14.7 $33.6 million and $15.2$27.3 million in 2017, 20162020, 2019 and 2015,2018, respectively. Restricted stock and restricted stock units generally vest over periods ranging from two to five years. If provided in the applicable Plan or award agreement, the vesting of restricted stock and restricted stock units may accelerate upon a change of control (as defined in the applicable Plan) of Ventas and other specified events. In addition to customary change in control vesting provisions, awards for executive officers will also generally vest to the executives if at a future termination date, they have attained a combined number of age and years of service of at least 75, with a minimum age of 62.
    
A summary of the status of our non-vested restricted stock and restricted stock units (including time-based and performance-based awards) as of December 31, 2017,2020, and changes during the year ended December 31, 20172020, follows:
Restricted
Stock
(000’s)
Weighted
Average
Grant Date
Fair Value
Restricted
Stock Units (000’s)
Weighted
Average
Grant Date
Fair Value
Restricted
Stock
(000’s)
 
Weighted
Average
Grant Date
Fair Value
 
Restricted
Stock Units (000’s)
 
Weighted
Average
Grant Date
Fair Value
Nonvested at December 31, 2016312
 $57.29
 15
 $58.70
Nonvested at December 31, 2019Nonvested at December 31, 2019248 $58.21 539 $56.99 
Granted283
 59.99
 409
 62.07
Granted170 44.36 446 59.81 
Vested(258) 58.82
 (10) 59.59
Vested(136)56.54 (271)55.14 
Forfeited(18) 58.95
 
 
Forfeited(49)54.08 
Nonvested at December 31, 2017319
 $58.36
 414
 $62.01
Nonvested at December 31, 2020Nonvested at December 31, 2020233 49.94 714 59.46 
    
As of December 31, 2017,2020, we had $22.5$19.8 million of unrecognized compensation cost related to non-vested restricted stock and restricted stock units under the Plans. We expect to recognize that cost over a weighted average period of 1.541.80 years. The total fair value at the vesting date for restricted stock and restricted stock units that vested during the years ended December 31, 2017, 20162020, 2019 and 20152018 was $16.6$19.8 million, $13.9$31.6 million and $18.3$15.5 million, respectively.


Employee and Director Stock Purchase Plan


We have in effect an Employee and Director Stock Purchase Plan (“ESPP”) under which our employees and directors may purchase shares of our common stock at a discount. Pursuant to the terms of the ESPP, on each purchase date, participants may purchase shares of common stock at a price not less than 90% of the market price on that date (with respect to the employee tax-favored portion of the plan) and not less than 95% of the market price on that date (with respect to the additional employee and director portion of the plan). We initially reserved 3.0 million shares for issuance under the ESPP. As of December 31, 2017, 0.12020, 0.2 million shares had been purchased under the ESPP and 2.92.8 million shares were available for future issuance.

Employee Benefit Plan
    
We maintain a 401(k) plan that allows eligible employees to defer compensation subject to certain limitations imposed by the Code. In 2017,2020, we made contributions for each qualifying employee of up to 3.5% of his or her salary, subject to certain limitations. During 2017, 20162020, 2019 and 2015,2018, our aggregate contributions were approximately $1.4$1.6 million, $1.3$1.5 million and $1.2$1.5 million, respectively.


NOTE 13—13–INCOME TAXES


We have elected to be taxed as a REIT under the applicable provisions of the Code, as amended, for every year beginning with the year ended December 31, 1999. We have also elected for certain of our subsidiaries to be treated as TRS entities, which are subject to federal, state and foreign income taxes. All entities other than the TRS entities are collectively referred to as the “REIT” within this Note.note. Certain REIT entities are subject to foreign income tax.


108

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)



Although we intend to continue to operate in a manner that will enable us to qualify as a REIT, such qualification depends upon our ability to meet, on a continuing basis, various distribution, stock ownership and other tests. During the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016 and 2015, ourOur tax treatment of distributions per common share was as follows:
For the Years Ended December 31,
2017 2016 2015202020192018
Tax treatment of distributions:     Tax treatment of distributions:   
Ordinary income$1.02814
 $2.68216
 $3.02368
Ordinary income$$$
Qualified ordinary income0.00337
 0.05794
 0.01632
Qualified ordinary income0.00696 0.12230 0.00375 
199A qualified business income199A qualified business income2.14381 2.22898 2.97465 
Long-term capital gain1.07836
 0.11613
 
Long-term capital gain0.28450 0.05916 
Unrecaptured Section 1250 gain0.21513
 0.10877
 
Unrecaptured Section 1250 gain0.04973 0.03434 0.12244 
Non-dividend distributionNon-dividend distribution0.78438 
Distribution reported for 1099-DIV purposes$2.32500
 $2.96500
 $3.04000
Distribution reported for 1099-DIV purposes2.48500 3.17000 3.16000 
Add: Dividend declared in current year and taxable in following year0.79000
 
 
Add: Dividend declared in current year and taxable in following year0.45000 0.79250 0.79250 
Less: Dividend declared in prior year and taxable in current yearLess: Dividend declared in prior year and taxable in current year(0.79250)(0.79250)(0.79000)
Distribution declared per common share outstanding$3.11500
 $2.96500
 $3.04000
Distribution declared per common share outstanding$2.14250 $3.17000 $3.16250 


We believe we have met the annual REIT distribution requirement by payment of at least 90% of our estimated taxable income for 2017, 20162020, 2019 and 2015.2018. Our consolidated benefit for income taxes for the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016 and 2015 was as follows:
For the Years Ended December 31,
2017 2016 2015202020192018
(In thousands) (In thousands)
Current - Federal$(5,672) $(2,991) $138
Current - Federal$402 $(1,840)$(2,953)
Current - State1,119
 1,241
 1,453
Current - State2,107 2,118 1,332 
Deferred - Federal(54,396) (19,539) (25,962)Deferred - Federal(56,835)(49,532)(32,492)
Deferred - State3,237
 (3,634) (3,054)Deferred - State(35,447)(3,353)(825)
Current - Foreign2,307
 1,067
 953
Current - Foreign2,929 2,335 1,892 
Deferred - Foreign(6,394) (7,487) (12,812)Deferred - Foreign(9,690)(6,038)(6,907)
Total$(59,799) $(31,343) $(39,284)Total$(96,534)$(56,310)$(39,953)


The 20172020 income tax benefit is primarily due to accounting for the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2017 (the “2017 Tax Act”), specifically a $64.5$95.9 million benefit from the reduced U.S. federal corporate tax rate on net deferred tax liabilities andbenefit from an offsetting expenseinternal restructuring of $23.3 million to establishcertain US taxable REIT subsidiaries completed in the first quarter, partially offset by a valuation allowance onrecorded against certain deferred interest carryforwards, lossestax assets in the second quarter.During the second quarter of 2020, we determined that the future tax benefits of certain TRS entities and the release of adeferred tax reserve. assets (primarily US federal NOL carryforwards which begin to expire in 2031) were not more likely than not to be realized.The 20162019 income tax benefit was primarily due primarily to losses of certain TRS entities, the $57.7 million reversal of avaluation allowances recorded against the net deferred tax liability at oneassets of certain of our TRS and the release of a tax reserve.entities.

Although the TRS entities and certain other foreign entities have paid minimal cash federal, state and foreign income taxes for the year ended December 31, 2017,2020, their federal income tax liabilities may increase in future years as we exhaust net operating loss (“NOL”) carryforwards and as our senior living and other business segmentsoperations grow. Such increases could be significant.


109

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)



A reconciliation of income tax expense and benefit, which is computed by applying the federal corporate tax rate for the years ended December 31, 2017, 20162020, 2019 and 2015,2018, to the income tax benefit is as follows:
For the Years Ended December 31,
2017 2016 2015202020192018
(In thousands) (In thousands)
Tax at statutory rate on earnings from continuing operations before unconsolidated entities, noncontrolling interest and income taxes$204,742
 $181,478
 $123,086
Tax at statutory rate on earnings from continuing operations before unconsolidated entities, noncontrolling interest and income taxes$27,132 $77,803 $80,811 
State income taxes, net of federal benefit(1,115) (1,022) (657)State income taxes, net of federal benefit(1,967)2,341 (253)
Increase in valuation allowance from ordinary operations8,237
 3,921
 20,978
Change in valuation allowance from ordinary operationsChange in valuation allowance from ordinary operations86,359 (47,227)(5,451)
Decrease in ASC 740 income tax liability(4,750) (3,582) (462)Decrease in ASC 740 income tax liability(4,347)
Tax at statutory rate on earnings not subject to federal income taxes(231,379) (209,204) (185,648)Tax at statutory rate on earnings not subject to federal income taxes(53,808)(90,862)(89,947)
Foreign rate differential and foreign taxes6,407
 2,094
 3,095
Foreign rate differential and foreign taxes3,342 1,407 1,924 
Change in tax status of TRS(690) (5,629) 
Change in tax status of TRS(150,287)(52)359 
Effect of the 2017 Tax Act(41,212) 
 
Effect of the 2017 Tax Act(23,160)
Other differences(39) 601
 324
Other differences(7,305)280 111 
Income tax benefit$(59,799) $(31,343) $(39,284)Income tax benefit$(96,534)$(56,310)$(39,953)
Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2017
On December 22, 2017, the 2017 Tax Act was signed into law making significant changes to the Internal Revenue Code.  The changes to existing U.S. tax laws as a result of the 2017 Tax Act, which we believe have the most significant impact on the Company’s federal income taxes are as follows:

The 2017 Tax Act reduces the corporate tax rate to 21%, effective January 1, 2018. Consequently, the Company’s deferred tax assets and liabilities were remeasured to reflect the reduction in the U.S. corporate income tax rate. We have recorded a decrease related to TRS net deferred tax liabilities of $19.9 million and a decrease to the associated valuation allowances of $44.6 million, with a corresponding net adjustment to deferred income tax benefit of $64.5 million for the year ended December 31, 2017.

The 2017 Tax Act amended the interest expense limitation rules applicable to business entities. An election is available under the 2017 Tax Act to be excluded from the new interest limitation provision for “real property trade or businesses.” We have made a reasonable estimate that the new interest limitation rules may disallow the deferred interest carried forward under the rules prior to the 2017 Tax Act. Consequently, we have recorded a provisional adjustment of $23.3 million for the entire deferred tax asset related to the existing deferred interest carryforward. We will recognize any changes to provisional amounts as we continue to analyze the existing statute or as additional guidance becomes available. We expect to complete our analysis of the provisional amounts by the end of 2018.

The 2017 Tax Act requires a one-time transition tax on the mandatory deemed repatriation of cumulative foreign earnings as of December 31, 2017. The Company believes that no such tax will be due as there are no accumulated foreign earnings applicable to the mandatory deemed repatriation.

We did not identify items for which the income tax effects of the 2017 Tax Act have not been completed and a reasonable estimate could not be determined as of December 31, 2017. Our analysis of the 2017 Tax Act may be impacted by new legislation, the Congressional Joint Committee Staff, Treasury, or other guidance.  Based on the 2017 Tax Act as enacted, we do not believe there will be further material impacts to the financial statements related to the other 2017 Tax Act provisions but cannot assure you as to the outcome of this matter.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)


Each TRS is a tax payingtax-paying component for purposes of classifying deferred tax assets and liabilities. The tax effects of temporary differences and carryforwards included in the net deferred tax liabilities at December 31, 2017, 2016 and 2015 are summarized as follows:
As of December 31,
2017 2016 2015202020192018
(In thousands) (In thousands)
Property, primarily differences in depreciation and amortization, the tax basis of land assets and the treatment of interests and certain costs$(300,395) $(409,803) $(413,566)Property, primarily differences in depreciation and amortization, the tax basis of land assets and the treatment of interests and certain costs$(60,494)$(257,373)$(269,758)
Operating loss and interest deduction carryforwards146,732
 195,415
 180,575
Operating loss and interest deduction carryforwards124,606 136,771 133,243 
Expense accruals and other12,890
 18,185
 14,624
Expense accruals and other10,516 7,380 11,910 
Valuation allowance(109,319) (120,438) (120,015)Valuation allowance(127,279)(40,114)(80,614)
Net deferred tax liabilities$(250,092) $(316,641) $(338,382)Net deferred tax liabilities$(52,651)$(153,336)$(205,219)

We established beginning net deferred tax assets and liabilities related to temporary differences between the financial reporting and the tax bases of assets acquired and liabilities assumed (primarily property, intangible and related assets, net of NOL carryforwards), for the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016, and 2015, in connection with the following acquisitions:
 2017 2016 2015
 (In thousands)
2015 HCT acquisition$
 $
 $(32,336)
2015 UK acquisition
 
 (18,569)
2016 Life Sciences Acquisition19,262
 (9,446) 
2017 miscellaneous acquisitions(4,510) 
 
Established beginning deferred tax assets or liabilities$14,752
 $(9,446) $(50,905)


Our net deferred tax liability decreased $66.5$100.7 million during 20172020 primarily due to a change in the tax status of certain of our TRS entities. This was offset by the recording of valuation allowances against $54.4 million of other deferred tax assets. Our net deferred tax liability decreased $51.9 million during 2019 primarily due to the $57.7 million reversal of valuation allowances recorded against the net deferred tax assets of certain of our TRS entities. Our net deferred tax liability decreased $44.8 million during 2018 primarily due to accounting for IRS guidance issued subsequent to the enactment of the 2017 Tax Act, specifically a $64.5$23.2 million benefit fromfor the reduced U.S. federal corporate tax rate on net deferred tax liabilities and an offsetting expensereversal of $23.3 million to establish a provisional adjustmentvaluation allowance on deferred interest carryforwards, the impactand tax losses of certain TRS operating losses, currency translation adjustments, and purchase accounting adjustments. Our net deferred tax liability decreased $21.7 million during 2016 primarily due to the reversal of a net deferred tax liability at one TRS and the impact of TRS operating losses and currency translation adjustments, offset by $9.4 million of recorded deferred tax liability as a result of the Life Sciences Acquisition.entities.


Due to uncertainty regarding the realization of certain deferred tax assets, we have established valuation allowances, primarily in connection with the NOL carryforwards related to certain TRSs.  The amounts related to NOLs at the TRS entities for 2017, 2016,2020, 2019 and 20152018 are $67.1$83.2 million, $84.7$21.2 million and $85.5$55.1 million, respectively.


NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)


A rollforward of valuation allowances, for the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016 and 2015, is as follows:
 2017 2016 2015
 (In thousands)
Beginning Balance$120,438
 $120,015
 $97,550
Additions:     
Purchase accounting
 
 1,002
Expenses(1)
9,277
 6,589
 21,375
Subtractions:     
Deductions(1)
(1,040) (2,668) (397)
Effect of the 2017 Tax Act(21,321) 
 
State income tax, net of federal impact956
 536
 529
Other activity (not resulting in expense or deduction)1,009
 (4,034) (44)
Ending balance$109,319
 $120,438
 $120,015

(1)
Generally, Expenses and Deductions are increases and decreases, respectively, in TRS valuation allowances, the latter being through utilization or release. The net amount equals the increase in valuation allowance on the reconciliation of income tax expense and benefit schedule above.
We are subject to corporate levelcorporate-level taxes (“built-in gains tax”) for any asset dispositions during the five-yearfive year period immediately after the assets were owned by a C corporation (either prior to our REIT election, through stock acquisition or merger). The amount of income potentially subject to built-in gains tax is generally equal to the lesser of the excess of the fair value of the asset over its adjusted tax basis as of the date it became a REIT asset or the actual amount of gain. Some, but not all, future gains could be offset by available NOL carryforwards.


At December 31, 2017, 20162020, 2019 and 2015,2018, the REIT had NOL carryforwards of $625.8$896.4 million, $1.1 billion$858.6 million and $1.1 billion,$910.7 million, respectively. Additionally, the REIT has $14.4$10.8 million of federal income tax credits that were carried over from acquisitions. These amounts can be used to offset future taxable income (and/or(or taxable income for prior years if an audit determines that tax is owed), if any. The REIT will be entitled to utilize NOLs and tax credit carryforwards only to the extent that REIT taxable income exceeds our deduction for dividends paid. Certain NOL and credit carryforwards are limited as to their utilization by Section 382 of the Code. The remaining REIT carryforwards begin to expire in 2024.2020.

110

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)


For the years ended December 31, 20172020 and 2016,2019, the net difference between tax bases and the reported amount of REIT assets and liabilities for federal income tax purposes was approximately $4.1$3.6 billion and $4.4$3.5 billion, respectively, less than the book bases of those assets and liabilities for financial reporting purposes.


Generally, we are subject to audit under the statute of limitations by the Internal Revenue Service (“IRS”) for the year ended December 31, 20142017 and subsequent years and are subject to audit by state taxing authorities for the year ended December 31, 20132016 and subsequent years. We are subject to audit generally under the statutes of limitation by the Canada Revenue Agency and provincial authorities with respect to the Canadian entities for the year ended December 31, 20132016 and subsequent years. We are also subject to audit in Canada for periods subsequent to the acquisition, and certain prior periods, with respect to entities acquired in 2014 from Holiday Retirement. We are subject to audit in the United Kingdom generally for the periods ended in and subsequent to 2016.2019.


The following table summarizes the activity related to our unrecognized tax benefits:
2017 201620202019
(In thousands) (In thousands)
Balance as of January 1$20,950
 $24,135
Balance as of January 1$12,127 $12,344 
Additions to tax positions related to prior years648
 222
Additions to tax positions related to prior years74 178 
Subtractions to tax positions related to prior years(497) 
Subtractions to tax positions related to prior years(6,144)(395)
Subtractions to tax positions as a result of the lapse of the statute of limitations(4,336) (3,407)
Balance as of December 31$16,765
 $20,950
Balance as of December 31$6,057 $12,127 

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)



Included in these unrecognized tax benefits of $16.8$6.1 million and $21.0$12.1 million at December 31, 20172020 and 2016,2019, respectively, were $15.0$5.3 million and $19.3$10.7 million of tax benefits at December 31, 20172020 and 2016,2019, respectively, that, if recognized, would reduce our annual effective tax rate. We accrued 0 interest of $0.2 millionor penalties related to the unrecognized tax benefits during 2017, but no penalties.2020. We do not expect our unrecognized tax benefits to increase or decrease by $2.6 million during 2018, as a result of the lapse of the statute of limitations.materially in 2021.


As a part of the transfer pricing structure in the normal course of business, the REIT enters into transactions with certain TRSs, such as leasing transactions, other capital financing and allocation of general and administrative costs, which transactions are intended to comply with Internal Revenue Service and foreign tax authority transfer pricing rules.



NOTE 14—14–COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES

Proceedings against Tenants, Operators and Managers

From time to time, Atria, Sunrise, Brookdale Senior Living, Ardent, Kindred and our other tenants, operators and managers are parties to certain legal actions, regulatory investigations and claims arising in the conduct of their business and operations. Even though we generally are not party to these proceedings, the unfavorable resolution of any such actions, investigations or claims could, individually or in the aggregate, materially adversely affect such tenants’, operators’ or managers’ liquidity, financial condition or results of operations and their ability to satisfy their respective obligations to us, which, in turn, could have a Material Adverse Effect on us.

Proceedings Indemnified and Defended by Third Parties

From time to time, we are party to certain legal actions, regulatory investigations and claims for which third parties are contractually obligated to indemnify, defend and hold us harmless. The tenants of our triple-net leased properties and, in some cases, their affiliates are required by the terms of their leases and other agreements with us to indemnify, defend and hold us harmless against certain actions, investigations and claims arising in the course of their business and related to the operations of our triple-net leased properties. In addition, third parties from whom we acquired certain of our assets and, in some cases, their affiliates are required by the terms of the related conveyance documents to indemnify, defend and hold us harmless against certain actions, investigations and claims related to the acquired assets and arising prior to our ownership or related to excluded assets and liabilities. In some cases, a portion of the purchase price consideration is held in escrow for a specified period of time as collateral for these indemnification obligations. We are presently being defended by certain tenants and other obligated third parties in these types of matters. We cannot assure you that our tenants, their affiliates or other obligated third parties will continue to defend us in these matters, that our tenants, their affiliates or other obligated third parties will have sufficient assets, income and access to financing to enable them to satisfy their defense and indemnification obligations to us or that any purchase price consideration held in escrow will be sufficient to satisfy claims for which we are entitled to indemnification. The unfavorable resolution of any such actions, investigations or claims could, individually or in the aggregate, materially adversely affect our tenants’ or other obligated third parties’ liquidity, financial condition or results of operations and their ability to satisfy their respective obligations to us, which, in turn, could have a Material Adverse Effect on us.

Proceedings Arising in Connection with Senior Living and Office Operations; Other Litigation


From time to time, we are party to various lawsuits, investigations, claims and other legal actions,and regulatory investigations and claims (some of which may not be insured and some of which may allege large damage amounts)proceedings arising in connection with our senior living and office operations or otherwise in the course of our business. In limitedcertain circumstances, the managerregardless of the applicable seniors housing community, MOBwhether we are a named party in a lawsuit, investigation, claim or life science and innovation centerother legal or regulatory proceeding, we may be contractually obligated to indemnify, defend and hold us harmless our tenants, operators, managers or other third parties against, or may otherwise be responsible for, such actions, investigationsproceedings or claims. These claims may include, among other things, professional liability and claims. general liability claims, commercial liability claims, unfair business practices claims and employment claims, as well as regulatory proceedings, including proceedings related to our senior living operations, where we are typically the holder of the applicable healthcare license. These claims may not be fully insured and some may allege large damage amounts.

It is the opinion of management, that except as otherwise set forth in this Note 14, that the disposition of any such actions,lawsuits, investigations, claims and claimsother legal and regulatory proceedings that are currently pending will not, individually or in the aggregate, have a Material Adverse Effectmaterial adverse effect on us. However, regardless of theirthe merits of a particular action, investigation or claim, we may be forced to expend significant financial resources to defend and resolve these matters. We are unable to predict the ultimate outcome of these actions,lawsuits, investigations, claims and claims,other legal and regulatory proceedings, and if management’s assessment of our liability with respect thereto is incorrect, such actions, investigations and claims could have a Material Adverse Effectmaterial adverse effect on us.


Certain Obligations, Liabilities and LitigationOperating Leases


We may be subjectlease land, equipment and corporate office space. At inception, we establish an operating lease asset and operating lease liability represented as the present value of future minimum lease payments. As our leases do not provide an implicit rate, we use a discount rate that approximates our incremental borrowing rate available at lease commencement to various obligations, liabilitiesdetermine the present value of lease payments. The incremental borrowing rates were adjusted for the length of the individual lease term. The weighted average discount rate and litigation assumed in connection with or arising outremaining lease term of our acquisitions or otherwise arising in connection with our business, some of which may be indemnifiable by third parties. If theseleases are 7.25% and 36.7 years, respectively. Operating lease assets and liabilities are greater than expectednot recognized for leases with an initial term of 12 months or were not knownless, as these short-term leases are accounted for similar to us at the time of acquisition, if we are not entitled to indemnification,previous guidance.
111

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)




or ifOur lease expense primarily consists of ground and corporate office leases. Ground lease expense is included in interest expense and corporate office lease expense is included in general and administrative expenses in the responsible third party fails to indemnify us, such obligations, liabilitiesCompany’s Consolidated Statements of Operation. For the years ended December 31, 2020 and litigation could have a Material Adverse Effect on us. In addition, in connection with the sale or leasing2019, we recognized $32.1 million and $32.6 million of our properties, we may incur various obligations and liabilities, including indemnification obligations to the buyer or tenant,expense relating to our leases. For the operations of those properties, which could have a Material Adverse Effect on us.

Other

With respect to certain of our properties, we are subject to operating and ground lease obligations that generally require fixed monthly or annual rent payments and may include escalation clauses and renewal options. These leases have terms that expire during the next 84 years excluding extension options.

As ofended December 31, 2017,2020 and 2019, cash paid for leases was $25.4 million and $25.8 million, respectively as reported within operating cash outflows in our Consolidated Statements of Cash Flow.
The following table summarizes future minimum lease obligations under non-cancelable ground and other operating and ground leases were as follows:of December 31, 2020 (in thousands):
2021$24,363 
202220,041 
202319,725 
202418,866 
202516,708 
Thereafter654,060 
Total undiscounted minimum lease payments753,763 
Less: imputed interest(543,846)
Operating lease liabilities$209,917 

 Lease Payments
 (In thousands)
2018$27,498
201923,953
202023,206
202122,651
202217,738
Thereafter623,462
Total$738,508

NOTE 15—15–EARNINGS PER SHARE


The following table shows the amounts used in computing our basic and diluted earnings per common share:
For the Year Ended December 31, For the Years Ended December 31,
2017 2016 2015 202020192018
(In thousands, except per share amounts) (In thousands, except per share amounts)
Numerator for basic and diluted earnings per share:     Numerator for basic and diluted earnings per share:   
Income from continuing operations$643,949
 $554,209
 $389,539
Income from continuing operations$441,185 $439,297 $415,991 
Discontinued operations(110) (922) 11,103
Discontinued operations(10)
Gain on real estate dispositions717,273
 98,203
 18,580
Net income1,361,112
 651,490
 419,222
Net income441,185 439,297 415,981 
Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests4,642
 2,259
 1,379
Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests2,036 6,281 6,514 
Net income attributable to common stockholders $1,356,470
 $649,231
 $417,843
Net income attributable to common stockholders $439,149 $433,016 $409,467 
Denominator:     Denominator:
Denominator for basic earnings per share—weighted average shares355,326
 344,703
 330,311
Denominator for basic earnings per share—weighted average shares373,368 365,977 356,265 
Effect of dilutive securities:     Effect of dilutive securities:
Stock options494
 569
 360
Stock options391 174 
Restricted stock awards265
 176
 41
Restricted stock awards171 527 331 
OP Unitholder interests2,481
 2,942
 3,295
OP unitholder interestsOP unitholder interests2,964 2,991 2,531 
Denominator for diluted earnings per share—adjusted weighted average shares358,566
 348,390
 334,007
Denominator for diluted earnings per share—adjusted weighted average shares376,503 369,886 359,301 
Basic earnings per share:     Basic earnings per share:
Income from continuing operations$1.81
 $1.61
 $1.18
Income from continuing operations$1.18 $1.20 $1.17 
Net income attributable to common stockholders 3.82
 1.88
 1.26
Net income attributable to common stockholders 1.18 1.18 1.15 
Diluted earnings per share:     Diluted earnings per share:  
Income from continuing operations$1.80
 $1.59
 $1.17
Income from continuing operations$1.17 $1.19 $1.16 
Net income attributable to common stockholders 3.78
 1.86 1.25
Net income attributable to common stockholders 1.17 1.17 1.14 
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)




There were 3.04.0 million, 1.41.1 million and 0.93.5 million anti-dilutive options outstanding for the years ended December 31, 2017, 20162020, 2019 and 2015,2018, respectively.


112


NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

NOTE 16—16–PERMANENT AND TEMPORARY EQUITY


Capital Stock


During the year ended December 31, 2017,From time to time, we issued and sold 1.1 million sharesmay sell up to an aggregate of $1.0 billion of our common stock under ouran “at-the-market” (“ATM”) equity offering program for aggregate net proceeds of $73.9 million, after sales agent commissions.(“ATM program”). As of December 31, 2017, approximately $155.62020, we have $755.5 million of our common stock remained available for saleremaining under our existing ATM equity offering program.

For During the yearyears ended December 31, 2016,2020 and 2019, we issuedsold 1.5 million and sold a total of 18.92.7 million shares of our common stock under our ATM equity offering program for gross proceeds of $44.88 and public offerings. Aggregate net proceeds for these activities were $1.3 billion, after sales agent commissions. We used the proceeds to fund a portion of the Life Sciences Acquisition, for working capital and other general corporate purposes. See “NOTE 4—ACQUISITIONS OF REAL ESTATE PROPERTY” for additional information.

In January 2015, in connection with the HCT acquisition, we issued approximately 28.4 million shares of our common stock and 1.1 million Class C Units that were redeemable for our common stock.
For$66.75 per share, respectively. During the year ended December 31, 2015,2018, we issued and sold a total of 7.2 million0 shares of common stock under our ATM equityprogram.

In June 2019, we sold 12.7 million shares of our common stock under a registered public offering program for aggregategross proceeds of $62.75 per share. We used the majority of the net proceeds to fund our LGM Acquisition. See “Note 4 – Acquisitions of $491.6 million, after sales agent commissions.Real Estate Property” and “Note 6 – Loans Receivable and Investments” for additional information regarding the LGM Acquisition.

Excess Share Provision


In order to preserve our ability to maintain REIT status, our CharterAmended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation (our “Charter”) provides that if a person acquires beneficial ownership of more than 9% of our outstanding common stock or 9.9% of our outstanding preferred stock, the shares that are beneficially owned in excess of such limit are deemed to be excess shares. These shares are automatically deemed transferred to a trust for the benefit of a charitable institution or other qualifying organization selected by our Board of Directors. The trust is entitled to all dividends with respect to the shares, and the trustee may exercise all voting power over the shares.


We have the right to buy the excess shares for a purchase price equal to the lesser of the price per share in the transaction that created the excess shares or the market price on the date we buy the shares, and we may defer payment of the purchase price for the excess shares for up to five years. If we do not purchase the excess shares, the trustee of the trust is required to transfer the excess shares at the direction of the Board of Directors. The owner of the excess shares is entitled to receive the lesser of the proceeds from the sale or the original purchase price for such excess shares, and any additional amounts are payable to the beneficiary of the trust. As of December 31, 2017,2020, there were no0 shares in the trust.


Our Board of Directors is empowered to grant waivers from the excess share provisions of our Charter.


Accumulated Other Comprehensive Loss


The following is a summary of our accumulated other comprehensive loss as of December 31, 2017 and 2016:loss:
As of December 31,
 20202019
 (In thousands)
Foreign currency translation$(51,947)$(51,743)
Available for sale securities25,712 27,380 
Derivative instruments(28,119)(10,201)
Total accumulated other comprehensive loss$(54,354)$(34,564)
113
 2017 2016
 (In thousands)
Foreign currency translation$(45,580) $(66,192)
Accumulated unrealized gain on government-sponsored pooled loan investments802
 1,239
Other9,658
 7,419
Total accumulated other comprehensive loss$(35,120) $(57,534)

The change in foreign currency translation during the year ended December 31, 2017 was due primarily to the remeasurement of our properties located in the United Kingdom.


NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)




Redeemable OP Unitholder and Noncontrolling Interests


The following is a rollforwardroll-forward of our redeemable OP Unitholder Interestsunitholder and noncontrolling interests for 2017:2020:
Redeemable OP Unitholder InterestsRedeemable Noncontrolling InterestsTotal Redeemable OP Unitholder and Noncontrolling Interests
(In thousands)
Balance as of December 31, 2019$171,178 $102,500 $273,678 
New issuances16,593 16,593 
Change in valuation(18,638)(8,068)(26,706)
Dispositions(14,350)(14,350)
Distributions and other(6,247)1,071 (5,176)
Redemptions(310)(8,239)(8,549)
Balance as of December 31, 2020$145,983 $89,507 $235,490 


  Redeemable OP Unitholder Interests Redeemable Noncontrolling Interests Total Redeemable OP Unitholder and Noncontrolling Interests
  (In thousands)
Balance as of December 31, 2016 $177,177
 $23,551
 $200,728
New issuances 
 2,143
 2,143
Change in valuation (2,112) 2,353
 241
Distributions and other (5,677) 
 (5,677)
Redemptions (23,136) (15,809) (38,945)
Balance as of December 31, 2017 $146,252
 $12,238
 $158,490
During 2017, third party investors redeemed 53,728 OP Units and 341,776 Class C Units for 390,403 shares of Ventas common stock, valued at $24.0 million.


NOTE 17—17–RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS


As disclosed in “NOTE 3—CONCENTRATION OF CREDIT RISK,” Atria provides comprehensive property management and accounting services with respect to our seniorssenior housing communities that Atria operates, for which we pay annual management fees pursuant to long-term management agreements. Most of our management agreements with Atria have initial terms expiring either July 31, 2024 or December 31, 2027, with successive automatic ten-year renewal periods. The management fees payable to Atria under most of the Atria management agreements range from 4.5% to 5% of revenues generated by the applicable properties, and Atria can earn up to an additional 1% of revenues based on the achievement of specified performance targets. Atria also provides certain construction and development management services relating to various development and redevelopment projects within our seniors housing portfolio. For the years ended December 31, 2017, 20162020, 2019 and 2015,2018, we incurred fees to Atria of $59.7$55.2 million, $58.7$62.1 million and $58.0$60.1 million, respectively, the majority of which are recorded within property-level operating expenses in our Consolidated Statements of Income.


We hold a 34% ownership interest in Atria, which entitles us to customary minority rights and protections, as well as the right to appoint 2 of the 6 members on the Atria Board of Directors.

As disclosed in “NOTE 4—ACQUISITIONS OF REAL ESTATE PROPERTY,”of December 31, 2020, we leased 1011 hospital campuses to Ardent pursuant to a single, triple-net master lease agreement. Pursuant to our master lease agreement, Ardent is obligated to pay base rent, which escalates annually by the lesser of four times the increase in the consumer price index for the relevant period and 2.5%.  The initial term of the master lease expires on August 31, 2035 and Ardent has one ten-year renewal option. For the years ended December 31, 20172020, 2019 and 2016, and the period from the closing of the Ardent Transaction through December 31, 2015,2018, we recognized rental income from Ardent of $110.8$122.6 million, $106.9$118.8 million and $42.9$114.8 million, respectively. respectively, relating to the Ardent master lease.

In 2015,June 2018, we made a $200.0 million investment in senior unsecured notes issued by a subsidiary of Ardent at a price of 98.6% of par value. The notes have an effective interest rate of 10.0% and mature in 2026. These marketable debt securities are classified as partavailable for sale and are reflected on our Consolidated Balance Sheets at fair value.

We hold a 9.8% ownership interest in Ardent, which entitles us to customary minority rights and protections, as well as the right to appoint 1 of the closing,11 members on the Ardent Board of Directors.
In January 2018, we also paid certain transaction-related feestransitioned the management of 76 private-pay senior housing communities to ArdentESL. These assets, substantially all of $40.0which were previously leased by Elmcroft Senior Living (“Elmcroft”) under triple-net leases, are now operated by ESL under a management contract with us and are included in the senior living operations reportable business segment. Upon termination of our lease with Elmcroft, we derecognized our accumulated straight-line receivable balance and offsetting reserve of $75.2 million. For the years ended December 31, 2020, 2019 and 2018, we incurred $5.2 million, which are recorded within$8.2 million and $23.6 million respectively of transaction and integration costs relating to this transaction, net of property-level net assets assumed for 0 consideration, primarily included in merger-related expenses and deal costs in our Consolidated Statements of Income.


These transactions are consideredIn January 2018, we acquired a 34% ownership interest in ESL, which entitles us to be arm’s length in naturecustomary minority rights and on terms consistentprotections, as well as the right to appoint 2 of the 6 members of the ESL Board of Directors. ESL management owns the 66% controlling interest.

ESL provides comprehensive property management and accounting services with transactions with unaffiliated third parties.respect to our senior housing communities that ESL operates, for which we pay annual management fees pursuant to a management agreement.  For the years ended December 31, 2020, 2019 and 2018, we incurred fees to ESL of $15.1 million, $14.6 million and $12.9 million,

114

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)



respectively, the majority of which are recorded within property-level operating expenses in our Consolidated Statements of Income.

NOTE 18—18–QUARTERLY FINANCIAL INFORMATION (UNAUDITED)


Summarized unaudited consolidated quarterly information for the years ended December 31, 2017 and 2016 is provided below.below:
 For the Year Ended December 31, 2020
 First
Quarter
Second
Quarter
Third
Quarter
Fourth
Quarter
 (In thousands, except per share amounts)
Revenues$1,012,054 $943,198 $918,940 $921,165 
Income (loss) from continuing operations$474,730 $(159,235)$13,737 $111,953 
Net income (loss)474,730 (159,235)13,737 111,953 
Net income (loss) attributable to noncontrolling interests1,613 (2,065)986 1,502 
Net income (loss) attributable to common stockholders          $473,117 $(157,170)$12,751 $110,451 
Basic earnings per share:    
Income (loss) from continuing operations$1.27 $(0.43)$0.04 $0.30 
Net income (loss) attributable to common stockholders1.27 (0.42)0.03 0.29 
Diluted earnings per share(1):
    
Income (loss) from continuing operations$1.26 $(0.43)$0.04 $0.30 
Net income (loss) attributable to common stockholders1.26 (0.42)0.03 0.29 
Dividends declared per common share$0.7925 $0.4500 $0.4500 $0.4500 

(1) Potential common shares are not included in the computation of diluted earnings per share when a loss from continuing operations exists, as the effect would be an antidilutive per share amount.

 For the Year Ended December 31, 2019
 First
Quarter
Second
Quarter
Third
Quarter
Fourth
Quarter
 (In thousands, except per share amounts)
Revenues$942,874 $950,717 $983,155 $996,004 
Income from continuing operations$127,588 $211,898 $86,918 $12,893 
Net income127,588 211,898 86,918 12,893 
Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests1,803 1,369 1,659 1,450 
  Net income attributable to common stockholders          $125,785 $210,529 $85,259 $11,443 
Basic earnings per share:    
Income from continuing operations$0.36 $0.59 $0.23 $0.03 
Net income attributable to common stockholders0.35 0.58 0.23 0.03 
Diluted earnings per share:    
Income from continuing operations$0.35 $0.58 $0.23 $0.03 
Net income attributable to common stockholders0.35 0.58 0.23 0.03 
Dividends declared per common share$0.7925 $0.7925 $0.7925 $0.7925 

115
 For the Year Ended December 31, 2017
 
First
Quarter
 
Second
Quarter
 
Third
Quarter
 
Fourth
Quarter
 (In thousands, except per share amounts)
Revenues$883,443
 $895,490
 $899,928
 $895,288
        
Income from continuing operations$155,912
 $152,272
 $156,930
 $178,835
Discontinued operations(53) (23) (19) (15)
Gain on real estate dispositions43,289
 719
 458,280
 214,985
Net income199,148
 152,968
 615,191
 393,805
Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests1,021
 1,137
 1,233
 1,251
Net income attributable to common stockholders          $198,127
 $151,831
 $613,958
 $392,554
Earnings per share: 
  
  
  
Basic: 
  
  
  
Income from continuing operations$0.44
 $0.43
 $0.44
 $0.50
Net income attributable to common stockholders0.56
 0.43
 1.72
 1.10
Diluted: 
  
  
  
Income from continuing operations$0.44
 $0.42
 $0.44
 $0.50
Net income attributable to common stockholders0.55
 0.42
 1.71
 1.09
        
Dividends declared per share$0.775
 $0.775
 $0.775
 $0.79
 For the Year Ended December 31, 2016
 
First
Quarter
 
Second
Quarter
 
Third
Quarter
 
Fourth
Quarter
 (In thousands, except per share amounts)
Revenues$852,289
 $848,404
 $867,116
 $875,713
        
Income from continuing operations$123,339
 $137,849
 $150,446
 $142,575
Discontinued operations(489) (148) (118) (167)
Gain (loss) on real estate dispositions26,184
 5,739
 (144) 66,424
Net income149,034
 143,440
 150,184
 208,832
Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests54
 278
 732
 1,195
  Net income attributable to common stockholders          $148,980
 $143,162
 $149,452
 $207,637
Earnings per share:       
Basic:       
Income from continuing operations$0.37
 $0.41
 $0.43
 $0.40
Net income attributable to common stockholders0.44
 0.42
 0.43
 0.59
Diluted:       
Income from continuing operations$0.36
 $0.40
 $0.42
 $0.40
Net income attributable to common stockholders0.44
 0.42
 0.42
 0.58
        
Dividends declared per share$0.73
 $0.73
 $0.73
 $0.775

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)



NOTE 19—19–SEGMENT INFORMATION

As of December 31, 2017,2020, we operated through three3 reportable business segments: triple-net leased properties, senior living operations and office operations. UnderIn our triple-net leased properties segment, we invest in and own seniorssenior housing and healthcare properties throughout the United States and the United Kingdom and lease those properties to healthcare operating companies under “triple-net” or “absolute-net” leases that obligate the tenants to pay all property-related expenses. In our senior living operations segment, we invest in seniorssenior housing communities throughout the United States and Canada and engage independent operators, such as Atria and Sunrise, to manage those communities. In our office operations segment, we primarily acquire, own, develop, lease and manage MOBs and life scienceresearch and innovation centers throughout the United States. Information provided for “all other” includes income from loans and investments and other miscellaneous income and various corporate-level expenses not directly attributable to any of our three3 reportable business segments. Assets included in “all other” consist primarily of corporate assets, including cash, restricted cash, loans receivable and investments, and miscellaneous accounts receivable.

Our chief operating decision makers evaluate performance of the combined properties in each reportable business segment and determine how to allocate resources to those segments, in significant part, based on segment NOI and related measures. We define segment NOI as total revenues, less interest and other income, property-level operating expenses and office building services costs. We consider segment NOI useful because it allows investors, analysts and our management to measure unlevered property-level operating results and to compare our operating results to the operating results of other real estate companies between periods on a consistent basis. In order to facilitate a clear understanding of our historical consolidated operating results, segment NOI should be examined in conjunction with net income from continuing operationsattributable to common stockholders as presented in our Consolidated Financial Statements and other financial data included elsewhere in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

Interest expense, depreciation and amortization, general, administrative and professional fees, income tax expense and other non-property specificnon-property-specific revenues and expenses are not allocated to individual reportable business segments for purposes of assessing segment performance. There are no0 intersegment sales or transfers.
116

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)



Summary information by reportable business segment is as follows:
For the Year Ended December 31, 2020
Triple-Net
Leased
Properties
Senior
Living
Operations
Office
Operations
All
Other
Total
 (In thousands)
Revenues:     
Rental income$695,265 $$799,627 $$1,494,892 
Resident fees and services2,197,160 2,197,160 
Office building and other services revenue8,675 6,516 15,191 
Income from loans and investments80,505 80,505 
Interest and other income7,609 7,609 
Total revenues$695,265 $2,197,160 $808,302 $94,630 $3,795,357 
Total revenues$695,265 $2,197,160 $808,302 $94,630 $3,795,357 
Less:    
Interest and other income7,609 7,609 
Property-level operating expenses22,160 1,658,671 256,612 1,937,443 
Office building services costs2,315 2,315 
Segment NOI$673,105 $538,489 $549,375 $87,021 1,847,990 
Interest and other income   7,609 
Interest expense    (469,541)
Depreciation and amortization    (1,109,763)
General, administrative and professional fees    (130,158)
Loss on extinguishment of debt, net    (10,791)
Merger-related expenses and deal costs    (29,812)
Allowance on loans receivable and investments(24,238)
Other    (707)
Income from unconsolidated entities1,844 
Gain on real estate dispositions262,218 
Income tax benefit    96,534 
Income from continuing operations    441,185 
Net income441,185 
Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests2,036 
Net income attributable to common stockholders$439,149 
117
 For the Year Ended December 31, 2017
 
Triple-Net
Leased
Properties
 
Senior
Living
Operations
 
Office
Operations
 
All
Other
 Total
 (In thousands)
Revenues:         
Rental income$840,131
 $
 $753,467
 $
 $1,593,598
Resident fees and services
 1,843,232
 
 
 1,843,232
Office building and other services revenue4,580
 
 7,497
 1,600
 13,677
Income from loans and investments
 
 
 117,608
 117,608
Interest and other income
 
 
 6,034
 6,034
Total revenues$844,711
 $1,843,232
 $760,964
 $125,242
 $3,574,149
          
Total revenues$844,711
 $1,843,232
 $760,964
 $125,242
 $3,574,149
Less:         
Interest and other income
 
 
 6,034
 6,034
Property-level operating expenses
 1,250,065
 233,007
 
 1,483,072
Office building services costs
 
 3,391
 
 3,391
Segment NOI844,711
 593,167
 524,566
 119,208
 2,081,652
Income (loss) from unconsolidated entities845
 (61) 503
 (1,848) (561)
Segment profit$845,556
 $593,106
 $525,069
 $117,360
 2,081,091
Interest and other income 
  
  
   6,034
Interest expense 
  
  
  
 (448,196)
Depreciation and amortization 
  
  
  
 (887,948)
General, administrative and professional fees 
  
  
  
 (135,490)
Loss on extinguishment of debt, net 
  
  
  
 (754)
Merger-related expenses and deal costs 
  
  
  
 (10,535)
Other 
  
  
  
 (20,052)
Income tax benefit 
  
  
  
 59,799
Income from continuing operations 
  
  
  
 $643,949

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)



For the Year Ended December 31, 2019
Triple-Net
Leased
Properties
Senior
Living
Operations
Office
Operations
All
Other
Total
 (In thousands)
Revenues:     
Rental income$780,898 $$828,978 $$1,609,876 
Resident fees and services2,151,533 2,151,533 
Office building and other services revenue7,747 3,409 11,156 
Income from loans and investments89,201 89,201 
Interest and other income10,984 10,984 
Total revenues$780,898 $2,151,533 $836,725 $103,594 $3,872,750 
Total revenues$780,898 $2,151,533 $836,725 $103,594 $3,872,750 
Less:     
Interest and other income10,984 10,984 
Property-level operating expenses26,561 1,521,398 260,249 1,808,208 
Office building services costs2,319 2,319 
Segment NOI$754,337 $630,135 $574,157 $92,610 2,051,239 
Interest and other income   10,984 
Interest expense    (451,662)
Depreciation and amortization    (1,045,620)
General, administrative and professional fees    (158,726)
Loss on extinguishment of debt, net    (41,900)
Merger-related expenses and deal costs    (15,235)
Other    10,339 
Loss from unconsolidated entities(2,454)
Gain on real estate dispositions26,022 
Income tax benefit    56,310 
Income from continuing operations    439,297 
Net income439,297 
Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests6,281 
Net income attributable to common stockholders$433,016 
118
 For the Year Ended December 31, 2016
 
Triple-Net
Leased
Properties
 
Senior
Living
Operations
 
Office
Operations
 
All
Other
 Total
 (In thousands)
Revenues:         
Rental income$845,834
 $
 $630,342
 $
 $1,476,176
Resident fees and services
 1,847,306
 
 
 1,847,306
Office building and other services revenue4,921
 
 13,029
 3,120
 21,070
Income from loans and investments
 
 
 98,094
 98,094
Interest and other income
 
 
 876
 876
Total revenues$850,755
 $1,847,306
 $643,371
 $102,090
 $3,443,522
          
Total revenues$850,755
 $1,847,306
 $643,371
 $102,090
 $3,443,522
Less:         
Interest and other income
 
 
 876
 876
Property-level operating expenses
 1,242,978
 191,784
 
 1,434,762
Office building services costs
 
 7,311
 
 7,311
Segment NOI850,755
 604,328
 444,276
 101,214
 2,000,573
Income from unconsolidated entities2,363
 1,265
 590
 140
 4,358
Segment profit$853,118
 $605,593
 $444,866
 $101,354
 2,004,931
Interest and other income 
  
  
   876
Interest expense 
  
  
  
 (419,740)
Depreciation and amortization 
  
  
  
 (898,924)
General, administrative and professional fees 
  
  
  
 (126,875)
Loss on extinguishment of debt, net 
  
  
  
 (2,779)
Merger-related expenses and deal costs 
  
  
  
 (24,635)
Other 
  
  
  
 (9,988)
Income tax benefit 
  
  
  
 31,343
Income from continuing operations 
  
  
  
 $554,209

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)



For the Year Ended December 31, 2018
Triple-Net
Leased
Properties
Senior
Living
Operations
Office
Operations
All
Other
Total
 (In thousands)
Revenues:     
Rental income$737,796 $$776,011 $$1,513,807 
Resident fees and services2,069,477 2,069,477 
Office building and other services revenue2,522 7,592 3,302 13,416 
Income from loans and investments124,218 124,218 
Interest and other income24,892 24,892 
Total revenues$740,318 $2,069,477 $783,603 $152,412 $3,745,810 
Total revenues$740,318 $2,069,477 $783,603 $152,412 $3,745,810 
Less:     
Interest and other income24,892 24,892 
Property-level operating expenses1,446,201 243,679 1,689,880 
Office building services costs1,418 1,418 
Segment NOI$740,318 $623,276 $538,506 $127,520 2,029,620 
Interest and other income   24,892 
Interest expense    (442,497)
Depreciation and amortization    (919,639)
General, administrative and professional fees    (145,978)
Loss on extinguishment of debt, net(58,254)
Merger-related expenses and deal costs    (30,547)
Other    (72,772)
Loss from unconsolidated entities(55,034)
Gain on real estate dispositions46,247 
Income tax benefit    39,953 
Income from continuing operations    415,991 
Discontinued operations(10)
Net income415,981 
Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests6,514 
Net income attributable to common stockholders$409,467 
 For the Year Ended December 31, 2015
 
Triple-Net
Leased
Properties
 
Senior
Living
Operations
 
Office
Operations
 
All
Other
 Total
 (In thousands)
Revenues:         
Rental income$779,801
 $
 $566,245
 $
 $1,346,046
Resident fees and services
 1,811,255
 
 
 1,811,255
Office building and other services revenue4,433
 
 34,436
 2,623
 41,492
Income from loans and investments
 
 
 86,553
 86,553
Interest and other income
 
 
 1,052
 1,052
Total revenues$784,234
 $1,811,255
 $600,681
 $90,228
 $3,286,398
          
Total revenues$784,234
 $1,811,255
 $600,681
 $90,228
 $3,286,398
Less:         
Interest and other income
 
 
 1,052
 1,052
Property-level operating expenses
 1,209,415
 174,225
 
 1,383,640
Office building services costs
 
 26,565
 
 26,565
Segment NOI784,234
 601,840
 399,891
 89,176
 1,875,141
(Loss) income from unconsolidated entities(813) (526) 369
 (450) (1,420)
Segment profit$783,421
 $601,314
 $400,260
 $88,726
 1,873,721
Interest and other income 
  
  
   1,052
Interest expense 
  
  
  
 (367,114)
Depreciation and amortization 
  
  
  
 (894,057)
General, administrative and professional fees 
  
  
  
 (128,035)
Loss on extinguishment of debt, net        (14,411)
Merger-related expenses and deal costs 
  
  
  
 (102,944)
Other 
  
  
  
 (17,957)
Income tax benefit 
  
  
  
 39,284
Income from continuing operations 
  
  
  
 $389,539
Assets by reportable business segment are as follows:
 As of December 31,
 20202019
 (Dollars in thousands)
Assets:    
Triple-net leased properties$5,147,503 21.6 %$6,381,657 25.8 %
Senior living operations10,653,428 44.5 10,142,023 41.1 
Office operations6,709,602 28.0 7,173,401 29.1 
All other assets1,418,871 5.9 995,127 4.0 
Total assets$23,929,404 100.0 %$24,692,208 100.0 %

119
 As of December 31,
 2017 2016
 (Dollars in thousands)
Assets:       
Triple-net leased properties$7,778,064
 32.4% $7,627,792
 32.9%
Senior living operations7,654,609
 32.0
 7,826,262
 33.8
Office operations6,897,696
 28.8
 6,614,454
 28.6
All other assets1,624,172
 6.8
 1,098,092
 4.7
Total assets$23,954,541
 100.0% $23,166,600
 100.0%

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)



Capital expenditures, including investments in real estate property and development project expenditures, by reportable business segment are as follows:
For the Year Ended December 31, For the Years Ended December 31,
2017 2016 2015 202020192018
(In thousands) (In thousands)
Capital expenditures:     Capital expenditures:   
Triple-net leased properties$169,661
 $74,192
 $1,890,245
Triple-net leased properties$42,930 $55,429 $58,744 
Senior living operations149,449
 105,614
 382,877
Senior living operations191,891 944,214 337,750 
Office operations492,765
 1,503,304
 604,827
Office operations372,475 519,129 332,147 
Total capital expenditures$811,875
 $1,683,110
 $2,877,949
Total capital expenditures$607,296 $1,518,772 $728,641 

Our portfolio of properties and mortgage loan and other investments are located in the United States, Canada and the United Kingdom. Revenues are attributed to an individual country based on the location of each property. Geographic information regarding our operations is as follows:
 For the Year Ended December 31,
 2017 2016 2015
 (In thousands)
Revenues:     
United States$3,361,682
 $3,242,353
 $3,086,449
Canada186,049
 174,831
 173,778
United Kingdom26,418
 26,338
 26,171
Total revenues$3,574,149
 $3,443,522
 $3,286,398
For the Years Ended December 31,
As of December 31, 202020192018
2017 2016 (In thousands)
(In thousands)
Net real estate property:   
Revenues:Revenues:   
United States$19,219,650
 $19,105,939
United States$3,381,357 $3,578,341 $3,524,875 
Canada1,070,903
 1,037,105
Canada389,205 266,946 192,350 
United Kingdom297,827
 251,710
United Kingdom24,795 27,463 28,585 
Total net real estate property$20,588,380
 $20,394,754
Total revenuesTotal revenues$3,795,357 $3,872,750 $3,745,810 

 As of December 31,
 20202019
 (In thousands)
Net real estate property:  
United States$17,303,816 $18,636,838 
Canada2,983,924 2,830,850 
United Kingdom262,295 266,885 
Total net real estate property$20,550,035 $21,734,573 


120


NOTE 20—CONDENSED CONSOLIDATING INFORMATION
Ventas, Inc. has fully and unconditionally guaranteed the obligation to pay principal and interest with respect to the outstanding senior notes issued by our 100% owned subsidiary, Ventas Realty, including the senior notes that were jointly issued with Ventas Capital Corporation. Ventas Capital Corporation is a direct 100% owned subsidiary of Ventas Realty that has no assets or operations, but was formed in 2002 solely to facilitate offerings of senior notes by a limited partnership. None of our other subsidiaries (such subsidiaries, excluding Ventas Realty and Ventas Capital Corporation, the “Ventas Subsidiaries”) is obligated with respect to Ventas Realty’s outstanding senior notes. Certain of Ventas Realty’s outstanding senior notes reflected in our condensed consolidating information were issued jointly with Ventas Capital Corporation.
Ventas, Inc. has also fully and unconditionally guaranteed the obligation to pay principal and interest with respect to the outstanding senior notes issued by our 100% owned subsidiary, Ventas Canada Finance Limited. None of our other subsidiaries is obligated with respect to Ventas Canada Finance Limited’s outstanding senior notes, all of which were issued on a private placement basis in Canada.
In connection with the NHP acquisition, our 100% owned subsidiary, NHP LLC, as successor to NHP, assumed the obligation to pay principal and interest with respect to the outstanding senior notes issued by NHP. Neither we nor any of our subsidiaries (other than NHP LLC) is obligated with respect to any of NHP LLC’s outstanding senior notes.
Under certain circumstances, contractual and legal restrictions, including those contained in the instruments governing our subsidiaries’ outstanding mortgage indebtedness, may restrict our ability to obtain cash from our subsidiaries for the

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)




purpose of meeting our debt service obligations, including our payment guarantees with respect to Ventas Realty’s and Ventas Canada Finance Limited’s senior notes.
The following summarizes our condensed consolidating information as of December 31, 2017 and 2016 and for the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016, and 2015:

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATING BALANCE SHEET
 As of December 31, 2017
 Ventas, Inc. Ventas Realty Ventas Subsidiaries 
Consolidated
Elimination
 Consolidated
 (In thousands)
Assets         
Net real estate investments$1,844
 $119,508
 $21,937,026
 $
 $22,058,378
Cash and cash equivalents9,828
 
 71,527
 
 81,355
Escrow deposits and restricted cash39,816
 128
 66,954
 
 106,898
Investment in and advances to affiliates14,786,086
 2,916,060
 
 (17,702,146) 
Goodwill
 
 1,034,641
 
 1,034,641
Assets held for sale
 
 100,324
 
 100,324
Other assets55,936
 9,458
 507,551
 
 572,945
Total assets$14,893,510
 $3,045,154
 $23,718,023
 $(17,702,146) $23,954,541
Liabilities and equity         
Liabilities:         
Senior notes payable and other debt$
 $8,895,641
 $2,380,421
 $
 $11,276,062
Intercompany loans7,835,266
 (7,127,624) (707,642) 
 
Accrued interest(6,410) 77,691
 22,677
 
 93,958
Accounts payable and other liabilities381,512
 24,635
 776,405
 
 1,182,552
Liabilities related to assets held for sale
 
 61,202
 
 61,202
Deferred income taxes250,092
 
 
 
 250,092
Total liabilities8,460,460
 1,870,343
 2,533,063
 
 12,863,866
Redeemable OP unitholder and noncontrolling interests
 
 158,490
 
 158,490
Total equity6,433,050
 1,174,811
 21,026,470
 (17,702,146) 10,932,185
Total liabilities and equity$14,893,510
 $3,045,154
 $23,718,023
 $(17,702,146) $23,954,541


NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)


CONDENSED CONSOLIDATING BALANCE SHEET
 As of December 31, 2016
 Ventas, Inc. 
Ventas
Realty
 Ventas Subsidiaries 
Consolidated
Elimination
 Consolidated
 (In thousands)
Assets         
Net real estate investments$2,007
 $173,259
 $21,017,430
 $
 $21,192,696
Cash and cash equivalents210,303
 
 76,404
 
 286,707
Escrow deposits and restricted cash198
 1,504
 78,945
 
 80,647
Investment in and advances to affiliates14,166,255
 2,938,442
 
 (17,104,697) 
Goodwill
 
 1,033,225
 
 1,033,225
Assets held for sale
 
 54,961
 
 54,961
Other assets35,468
 6,791
 476,105
 
 518,364
Total assets$14,414,231
 $3,119,996
 $22,737,070
 $(17,104,697) $23,166,600
Liabilities and equity         
Liabilities:         
Senior notes payable and other debt$
 $8,406,979
 $2,720,347
 $
 $11,127,326
Intercompany loans6,996,162
 (6,209,706) (786,456) 
 
Accrued interest(1,753) 67,156
 18,359
 
 83,762
Accounts payable and other liabilities89,115
 35,587
 783,226
 
 907,928
Liabilities related to assets held for sale
 (1) 1,463
 
 1,462
Deferred income taxes316,641
 
 
 
 316,641
Total liabilities7,400,165
 2,300,015
 2,736,939
 
 12,437,119
Redeemable OP unitholder and noncontrolling interests
 
 200,728
 
 200,728
Total equity7,014,066
 819,981
 19,799,403
 (17,104,697) 10,528,753
Total liabilities and equity$14,414,231
 $3,119,996
 $22,737,070
 $(17,104,697) $23,166,600











NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)


CONDENSED CONSOLIDATING STATEMENT OF INCOME
 For the Year Ended December 31, 2017
 Ventas, Inc. Ventas Realty Ventas Subsidiaries 
Consolidated
Elimination
 Consolidated
 (In thousands)
Revenues         
Rental income$2,383
 $178,165
 $1,413,050
 $
 $1,593,598
Resident fees and services
 
 1,843,232
 
 1,843,232
Office building and other services revenues
 
 13,677
 
 13,677
Income from loans and investments1,236
 
 116,372
 
 117,608
Equity earnings in affiliates488,862
 
 (1,620) (487,242) 
Interest and other income5,388
 
 646
 
 6,034
Total revenues497,869
 178,165
 3,385,357
 (487,242) 3,574,149
Expenses         
Interest(101,222) 319,630
 229,788
 
 448,196
Depreciation and amortization5,483
 7,510
 874,955
 
 887,948
Property-level operating expenses
 329
 1,482,743
 
 1,483,072
Office building services costs
 
 3,391
 
 3,391
General, administrative and professional fees2,056
 16,976
 116,458
 
 135,490
Loss (gain) on extinguishment of debt, net
 943
 (189) 
 754
Merger-related expenses and deal costs9,797
 
 738
 
 10,535
Other2,247
 1
 17,804
 
 20,052
Total expenses(81,639) 345,389
 2,725,688
 
 2,989,438
Income (loss) before unconsolidated entities, income taxes, discontinued operations, real estate dispositions and noncontrolling interests579,508
 (167,224) 659,669
 (487,242) 584,711
Income (loss) from unconsolidated entities
 5,306
 (5,867) 
 (561)
Income tax benefit59,799
 
 
 
 59,799
Income (loss) from continuing operations639,307
 (161,918) 653,802
 (487,242) 643,949
Discontinued operations(110) 
 
 
 (110)
Gain on real estate dispositions717,273
 
 
 
 717,273
Net income (loss)1,356,470
 (161,918) 653,802
 (487,242) 1,361,112
Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests
 
 4,642
 
 4,642
Net income (loss) attributable to common stockholders$1,356,470
 $(161,918) $649,160
 $(487,242) $1,356,470


NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)


CONDENSED CONSOLIDATING STATEMENT OF INCOME
 For the Year Ended December 31, 2016
 Ventas, Inc. Ventas Realty Ventas Subsidiaries 
Consolidated
Elimination
 Consolidated
 (In thousands)
Revenues         
Rental income$2,670
 $196,991
 $1,276,515
 $
 $1,476,176
Resident fees and services
 
 1,847,306
 
 1,847,306
Office building and other services revenues1,605
 
 19,465
 
 21,070
Income from loans and investments341
 
 97,753
 
 98,094
Equity earnings in affiliates500,515
 
 (1,223) (499,292) 
Interest and other income666
 
 210
 
 876
Total revenues505,797
 196,991
 3,240,026
 (499,292) 3,443,522
Expenses         
Interest(46,650) 281,458
 184,932
 
 419,740
Depreciation and amortization8,968
 18,297
 871,659
 
 898,924
Property-level operating expenses
 317
 1,434,445
 
 1,434,762
Office building services costs
 
 7,311
 
 7,311
General, administrative and professional fees509
 18,320
 108,046
 
 126,875
Loss on extinguishment of debt, net
 2,770
 9
 
 2,779
Merger-related expenses and deal costs23,068
 
 1,567
 
 24,635
Other(705) 41
 10,652
 
 9,988
Total expenses(14,810) 321,203
 2,618,621
 
 2,925,014
Income (loss) before unconsolidated entities, income taxes, discontinued operations and noncontrolling interests520,607
 (124,212) 621,405
 (499,292) 518,508
Income from unconsolidated entities
 1,840
 2,518
 
 4,358
Income tax benefit31,343
 
 
 
 31,343
Income (loss) from continuing operations551,950
 (122,372) 623,923
 (499,292) 554,209
Discontinued operations(922) 
 
 
 (922)
Gain on real estate dispositions98,203
 
 
 
 98,203
Net income (loss)649,231
 (122,372) 623,923
 (499,292) 651,490
Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests
 
 2,259
 
 2,259
Net income (loss) attributable to common stockholders$649,231
 $(122,372) $621,664
 $(499,292) $649,231


NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)


CONDENSED CONSOLIDATING STATEMENT OF INCOME
 For the Year Ended December 31, 2015
 Ventas, Inc. Ventas Realty Ventas Subsidiaries 
Consolidated
Elimination
 Consolidated
 (In thousands)
Revenues         
Rental income$3,663
 $198,017
 $1,144,366
 $
 $1,346,046
Resident fees and services
 
 1,811,255
 
 1,811,255
Office building and other services revenues895
 
 40,597
 
 41,492
Income from loans and investments8,605
 534
 77,414
 
 86,553
Equity earnings in affiliates458,213
 
 (649) (457,564) 
Interest and other income495
 (6) 563
 
 1,052
Total revenues471,871
 198,545
 3,073,546
 (457,564) 3,286,398
Expenses         
Interest(38,393) 257,503
 148,004
 
 367,114
Depreciation and amortization5,443
 14,679
 873,935
 
 894,057
Property-level operating expenses
 367
 1,383,273
 
 1,383,640
Office building services costs
 
 26,565
 
 26,565
General, administrative and professional fees(321) 20,777
 107,579
 
 128,035
Loss on extinguishment of debt, net
 4,523
 9,888
 
 14,411
Merger-related expenses and deal costs98,644
 75
 4,225
 
 102,944
Other(358) 45
 18,270
 
 17,957
Total expenses65,015
 297,969
 2,571,739
 
 2,934,723
Income (loss) before unconsolidated entities, income taxes, discontinued operations, and noncontrolling interests406,856
 (99,424) 501,807
 (457,564) 351,675
Loss from unconsolidated entities
 (183) (1,237) 
 (1,420)
Income tax benefit39,284
 
 
 
 39,284
Income (loss) from continuing operations446,140
 (99,607) 500,570
 (457,564) 389,539
Discontinued operations(46,877)
34,748

23,232
 
 11,103
Gain on real estate dispositions18,580
 
 
 
 18,580
Net income (loss)417,843
 (64,859) 523,802
 (457,564) 419,222
Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests
 
 1,379
 
 1,379
Net income (loss) attributable to common stockholders$417,843
 $(64,859) $522,423
 $(457,564) $417,843


NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)


CONDENSED CONSOLIDATING STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME
 For the Year Ended December 31, 2017
 Ventas, Inc. Ventas Realty Ventas Subsidiaries 
Consolidated
Elimination
 Consolidated
 (In thousands)
Net income (loss)$1,356,470
 $(161,918) $653,802
 $(487,242) $1,361,112
Other comprehensive (loss) income:         
Foreign currency translation
 
 20,612
 
 20,612
Unrealized loss on government-sponsored pooled loan investments(437) 
 
 
 (437)
Other
 
 2,239
 
 2,239
Total other comprehensive (loss) income(437) 
 22,851
 
 22,414
Comprehensive income (loss)1,356,033
 (161,918) 676,653
 (487,242) 1,383,526
Comprehensive income attributable to noncontrolling interests
 
 4,642
 
 4,642
Comprehensive income (loss) attributable to common stockholders$1,356,033
 $(161,918) $672,011
 $(487,242) $1,378,884
 For the Year Ended December 31, 2016
 Ventas, Inc. Ventas Realty Ventas Subsidiaries 
Consolidated
Elimination
 Consolidated
 (In thousands)
Net income (loss)$649,231
 $(122,372) $623,923
 $(499,292) $651,490
Other comprehensive loss:         
Foreign currency translation
 
 (52,266) 
 (52,266)
Unrealized loss on government-sponsored pooled loan investments(310) 
 
 
 (310)
Other
 
 2,607
 
 2,607
Total other comprehensive loss(310) 
 (49,659) 
 (49,969)
Comprehensive income (loss)648,921
 (122,372) 574,264
 (499,292) 601,521
Comprehensive income attributable to noncontrolling interests
 
 2,259
 
 2,259
Comprehensive income (loss) attributable to common stockholders$648,921
 $(122,372) $572,005
 $(499,292) $599,262
 For the Year Ended December 31, 2015
 Ventas, Inc. Ventas Realty Ventas Subsidiaries 
Consolidated
Elimination
 Consolidated
 (In thousands)
Net income (loss)$417,843
 $(64,859) $523,802
 $(457,564) $419,222
Other comprehensive loss:         
Foreign currency translation
 
 (14,792) 
 (14,792)
Unrealized loss on government-sponsored pooled loan investments(5,236) 
 
 
 (5,236)
Other
 
 (658) 
 (658)
Total other comprehensive loss(5,236) 
 (15,450) 
 (20,686)
Comprehensive income (loss)412,607
 (64,859) 508,352
 (457,564) 398,536
Comprehensive income attributable to noncontrolling interests
 
 1,379
 
 1,379
Comprehensive income (loss) attributable to common stockholders$412,607
 $(64,859) $506,973
 $(457,564) $397,157



NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)


CONDENSED CONSOLIDATING STATEMENT OF CASH FLOWS
 For the Year Ended December 31, 2017
 Ventas, Inc. Ventas Realty Ventas Subsidiaries 
Consolidated
Elimination
 Consolidated
 (In thousands)
Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities$150,548
 $(142,584) $1,434,216
 $
 $1,442,180
Cash flows from investing activities:         
Net investment in real estate property(350,900) 
 (29,332) 
 (380,232)
Investment in loans receivable and other(4,633) 
 (743,486) 
 (748,119)
Proceeds from real estate disposals537,144
 
 287
 
 537,431
Proceeds from loans receivable47
 
 101,050
 
 101,097
Development project expenditures
 
 (299,085) 
 (299,085)
Capital expenditures
 (726) (131,832) 
 (132,558)
Distributions from unconsolidated entities
 
 6,169
 
 6,169
Investment in unconsolidated entities
 
 (61,220) 
 (61,220)
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities181,658
 (726) (1,157,449) 
 (976,517)
Cash flows from financing activities:         
Net change in borrowings under revolving credit facilities
 478,868
 (94,085) 
 384,783
Proceeds from debt
 793,904
 317,745
 
 1,111,649
Repayment of debt
 (778,606) (590,478) 
 (1,369,084)
Purchase of noncontrolling interests(15,809) 
 
 

 (15,809)
Net change in intercompany debt1,002,694
 (917,917) (84,777) 
 
Payment of deferred financing costs
 (20,450) (6,847) 
 (27,297)
Issuance of common stock, net73,596
 
 
 
 73,596
Cash distribution (to) from affiliates(804,901) 587,511
 217,390
 
 
Cash distribution to common stockholders(827,285) 
 
 
 (827,285)
Cash distribution to redeemable OP unitholders
 
 (5,677) 
 (5,677)
Contributions from noncontrolling interests
 
 4,402
 
 4,402
Distributions to noncontrolling interests
 
 (11,187) 
 (11,187)
Other10,582
 
 
 
 10,582
Net cash (used in) provided by financing activities(561,123) 143,310
 (253,514) 
 (671,327)
Net (decrease) increase in cash and cash equivalents(228,917) 
 23,253
 
 (205,664)
Effect of foreign currency translation on cash and cash equivalents28,442
 
 (28,130) 
 312
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period210,303
 
 76,404
 
 286,707
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period$9,828
 $
 $71,527
 $
 $81,355











NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)


CONDENSED CONSOLIDATING STATEMENT OF CASH FLOWS
 For the Year Ended December 31, 2016
 Ventas, Inc. Ventas Realty Ventas Subsidiaries 
Consolidated
Elimination
 Consolidated
 (In thousands)
Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities$69,496
 $(92,923) $1,395,768
 $
 $1,372,341
Cash flows from investing activities:         
  Net investment in real estate property(1,448,230) 
 19,118
 
 (1,429,112)
  Investment in loans receivable and other
 
 (158,635) 
 (158,635)
  Proceeds from real estate disposals257,441
 
 43,120
 
 300,561
  Proceeds from loans receivable
 
 320,082
 
 320,082
  Development project expenditures
 
 (143,647) 
 (143,647)
  Capital expenditures
 (314) (117,142) 
 (117,456)
  Investment in unconsolidated entities
 
 (6,436) 
 (6,436)
Net cash used in investing activities(1,190,789) (314) (43,540) 
 (1,234,643)
Cash flows from financing activities:         
Net change in borrowings under unsecured revolving credit facility
 (171,000) 135,363
 
 (35,637)
Proceeds from debt
 846,521
 46,697
 
 893,218
Repayment of debt
 (651,820) (370,293) 
 (1,022,113)
Net change in intercompany debt990,056
 82,266
 (1,072,322) 
 
Purchase of noncontrolling interests
 
 (2,846) 
 (2,846)
Payment of deferred financing costs
 (5,787) (768) 
 (6,555)
Issuance of common stock, net1,286,680
 
 
 
 1,286,680
Cash distribution from (to) affiliates107,232
 (6,943) (100,289) 
 
Cash distribution to common stockholders(1,024,968) 
 
 
 (1,024,968)
Cash distribution to redeemable OP unitholders
 
 (8,640) 
 (8,640)
Contributions from noncontrolling interests
 
 7,326
 
 7,326
Distributions to noncontrolling interests
 
 (6,879) 
 (6,879)
Other17,252
 
 
 
 17,252
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities1,376,252
 93,237
 (1,372,651) 
 96,838
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents254,959
 
 (20,423) 
 234,536
Effect of foreign currency translation on cash and cash equivalents(56,389) 
 55,537
 
 (852)
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period11,733
 
 41,290
 
 53,023
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period$210,303
 $
 $76,404
 $
 $286,707
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)


CONDENSED CONSOLIDATING STATEMENT OF CASH FLOWS
 For the Year Ended December 31, 2015
 Ventas, Inc. Ventas Realty Ventas Subsidiaries 
Consolidated
Elimination
 Consolidated
 (In thousands)
Net cash (used in) provided by operating activities$(115,977) $16,528
 $1,498,280
 $
 $1,398,831
Cash flows from investing activities:         
Net investment in real estate property(2,650,788) 
 
 
 (2,650,788)
Investment in loans receivable and other
 
 (171,144) 
 (171,144)
Proceeds from real estate disposals492,408
 
 
 
 492,408
Proceeds from loans receivable
 
 109,176
 
 109,176
Proceeds from sale or maturity of marketable securities76,800
 
 
 
 76,800
Funds held in escrow for future development expenditures
 
 4,003
 
 4,003
Development project expenditures
 
 (119,674) 
 (119,674)
Capital expenditures
 (15,733) (91,754) 
 (107,487)
Investment in unconsolidated entities(26,282) 
 (30,704) 
 (56,986)
Net cash used in investing activities(2,107,862) (15,733) (300,097) 
 (2,423,692)
Cash flows from financing activities:         
Net change in borrowings under unsecured revolving credit facility
 (584,000) (139,457) 
 (723,457)
Net cash impact of CCP spin-off1,273,000
 
 (1,401,749) 
 (128,749)
Proceeds from debt
 2,292,568
 220,179
 
 2,512,747
Issuance of debt related to CCP spin-off
 
 1,400,000
 
 1,400,000
Repayment of debt
 (705,000) (730,596) 
 (1,435,596)
Net change in intercompany debt1,782,954
 (1,008,773) (774,181) 
 
Purchase of noncontrolling interests
 
 (3,819) 
 (3,819)
Payment of deferred financing costs
 (22,297) (2,368) 
 (24,665)
Issuance of common stock, net491,023
 
 
 
 491,023
Cash distribution (to) from affiliates(315,466) 26,707
 288,759
 
 
Cash distribution to common stockholders(1,003,413) 
 
 
 (1,003,413)
Cash distribution to redeemable OP unitholders


 (15,095) 
 (15,095)
Purchases of redeemable OP units
 
 (33,188) 
 (33,188)
Distributions to noncontrolling interests
 
 (12,649) 
 (12,649)
Other(81) 
 
 
 (81)
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities2,228,017
 (795) (1,204,164) 
 1,023,058
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents4,178
 
 (5,981) 
 (1,803)
Effect of foreign currency translation on cash and cash equivalents(17,302) 
 16,780
 
 (522)
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period24,857
 
 30,491
 
 55,348
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period$11,733
 $
 $41,290
 $
 $53,023

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)


NOTE 21—SUBSEQUENT EVENT

In January 2018, we transitioned the management of 76 private pay seniors housing communities to Eclipse Senior Living (“ESL”). These assets, substantially all of which were previously leased by Elmcroft Senior Living (“Elmcroft”), are now operated by ESL under a management contract with us. We acquired a 34% ownership stake in ESL with customary rights and protections. ESL management owns the remaining 66% stake. We also intend to form a new joint venture with an institutional partner related to the assets previously leased by Elmcroft. However, there can be no assurance whether, when or on what terms the joint venture will be completed.



VENTAS, INC.
SCHEDULE II
VALUATION AND QUALIFYING ACCOUNTS

Allowance Accounts   Additions Deductions  
  
(In thousands)

Year Ended December 31, Balance at Beginning of Year Charged to Earnings Acquired Properties Uncollectible Accounts Written-off Disposed Properties Balance at End of Year
             
2017            
Allowance for doubtful accounts 11,636
 7,207
 
 (3,237) (443) $15,163
Straight-line rent receivable allowance 109,836
 8,540
 
 
 (612) $117,764
  121,472
 15,747
 
 (3,237) (1,055) $132,927
             
2016            
Allowance for doubtful accounts 13,546
 5,093
 
 (7,111) 108
 $11,636
Straight-line rent receivable allowance 101,418
 9,682
 
 
 (1,264) $109,836
  114,964
 14,775
 
 (7,111) (1,156) $121,472
             
2015            
Allowance for doubtful accounts 11,460
 10,937
 753
 (12,977) 3,373
 $13,546
Straight-line rent receivable allowance 83,461
 35,448
 
 
 (17,491) $101,418
  94,921
 46,385
 753
 (12,977) (14,118) $114,964


VENTAS, INC.
SCHEDULE III
REAL ESTATE AND ACCUMULATED DEPRECIATION
 For the Years Ended December 31,
 202020192018
 (In thousands)
Reconciliation of real estate:   
Carrying cost:   
Balance at beginning of period$27,133,514 $24,973,983 $24,712,478 
Additions during period:
Acquisitions249,290 1,941,018 318,895 
Capital expenditures485,479 575,624 446,490 
Deductions during period:
Foreign currency translation80,302 107,508 (105,192)
Other(1)
(1,098,143)(464,619)(398,688)
Balance at end of period$26,850,442 $27,133,514 $24,973,983 
Accumulated depreciation:   
Balance at beginning of period$6,200,230 $5,492,310 $4,802,917 
Additions during period:
Depreciation expense809,067 811,936 791,882 
Dispositions:
Sales and/or transfers to assets held for sale(82,559)(116,771)(84,819)
Foreign currency translation40,675 12,755 (17,670)
Balance at end of period$6,967,413 $6,200,230 $5,492,310 

(1)Other may include sales, transfers to assets held for sale and impairments.
121
 For the Years Ended December 31,
 2017 2016 2015
 (In thousands)
Reconciliation of real estate:     
Carrying cost:     
Balance at beginning of period$23,816,586
 $22,458,032
 $19,241,735
Additions during period:     
Acquisitions702,501
 1,380,044
 4,063,355
Capital expenditures452,419
 270,664
 229,560
Deductions during period:     
Foreign currency translation93,490
 (6,252) (209,460)
Other(1)
(397,158) (285,902) (867,158)
Balance at end of period$24,667,838
 $23,816,586
 $22,458,032
      
Accumulated depreciation:     
Balance at beginning of period$4,190,496
 $3,544,625
 $2,925,508
Additions during period:     
Depreciation expense760,314
 732,309
 778,419
Dispositions:     
Sales and/or transfers to assets held for sale(176,926) (87,431) (144,545)
Foreign currency translation11,511
 993
 (14,757)
Balance at end of period$4,785,395
 $4,190,496
 $3,544,625
(1)

Other may include sales, transfers to assets held for sale and impairments.

VENTAS, INC.
SCHEDULE III
REAL ESTATE AND ACCUMULATED DEPRECIATION
December 31, 20172020
(Dollars in thousands)

 Location Initial Cost to CompanyGross Amount Carried at Close of Period   
Property NameCityState /
Province
EncumbrancesLand and
Improvements
Buildings and
Improvements
Costs
Capitalized
Subsequent
to Acquisition1
Land and
Improvements
Buildings and
Improvements
TotalAccumulated
Depreciation
NBVYear of
Construction
Year
Acquired
Life on
Which
Depreciation
in Income
Statement
Is Computed
SPECIALTY HOSPITALS 
Rehabilitation Hospital of Southern ArizonaTucsonAZ$$770 $25,589 $$770 $25,589 $26,359 $7,121 $19,238 1992201135 years
Kindred Hospital - BreaBreaCA3,144 2,611 3,144 2,611 5,755 1,675 4,080 19901995 40 years
Kindred Hospital - OntarioOntarioCA523 2,988 523 2,988 3,511 3,228 283 19501994 25 years
Kindred Hospital - San DiegoSan DiegoCA670 11,764 670 11,764 12,434 11,957 477 19651994 25 years
Kindred Hospital - San Francisco Bay AreaSan LeandroCA2,735 5,870 2,735 5,870 8,605 6,205 2,400 19621993 25 years
Tustin Rehabilitation HospitalTustinCA2,810 25,248 2,810 25,248 28,058 7,162 20,896 1991201135 years
Kindred Hospital - WestminsterWestminsterCA727 7,384 727 7,384 8,111 7,562 549 19731993 20 years
Kindred Hospital - DenverDenverCO896 6,367 896 6,367 7,263 6,712 551 19631994 20 years
Kindred Hospital - South Florida - Coral GablesCoral GablesFL1,071 5,348 (1,000)71 5,348 5,419 5,290 129 19561992 30 years
Kindred Hospital - South Florida Ft. LauderdaleFort LauderdaleFL1,758 14,080 1,758 14,080 15,838 14,171 1,667 19691989 30 years
Kindred Hospital - North FloridaGreen Cove SpringsFL145 4,613 145 4,613 4,758 4,683 75 19561994 20 years
Kindred Hospital - South Florida - HollywoodHollywoodFL605 5,229 605 5,229 5,834 5,234 600 19371995 20 years
Kindred Hospital - Bay Area St. PetersburgSt. PetersburgFL1,401 16,706 1,401 16,706 18,107 15,181 2,926 19681997 40 years
Kindred Hospital - Central TampaTampaFL2,732 7,676 2,732 7,676 10,408 5,824 4,584 19701993 40 years
Kindred Hospital - Chicago (North Campus)ChicagoIL1,583 19,980 1,583 19,980 21,563 20,142 1,421 19491995 25 years
Kindred - Chicago - LakeshoreChicagoIL1,513 9,525 1,513 9,525 11,038 9,483 1,555 19951976 20 years
Kindred Hospital - Chicago (Northlake Campus)NorthlakeIL850 6,498 850 6,498 7,348 6,726 622 19601991 30 years
Kindred Hospital - SycamoreSycamoreIL77 8,549 77 8,549 8,626 8,456 170 19491993 20 years
Kindred Hospital - IndianapolisIndianapolisIN985 3,801 985 3,801 4,786 3,880 906 19551993 30 years
Kindred Hospital - LouisvilleLouisvilleKY3,041 12,279 3,041 12,279 15,320 12,600 2,720 19641995 20 years
Kindred Hospital - St. LouisSt. LouisMO1,126 2,087 1,126 2,087 3,213 2,057 1,156 19841991 40 years
Kindred Hospital - Las Vegas (Sahara)Las VegasNV1,110 2,177 1,110 2,177 3,287 1,590 1,697 19801994 40 years
Lovelace Rehabilitation HospitalAlbuquerqueNM401 17,796 1,068 401 18,864 19,265 3,306 15,959 1989201536 years
Kindred Hospital - AlbuquerqueAlbuquerqueNM11 4,253 11 4,253 4,264 3,206 1,058 19851993 40 years
Kindred Hospital - GreensboroGreensboroNC1,010 7,586 1,010 7,586 8,596 7,788 808 19641994 20 years
University Hospitals Rehabilitation HospitalBeachwoodOH1,800 16,444 1,800 16,444 18,244 3,646 14,598 2013201335 years
Kindred Hospital - PhiladelphiaPhiladelphiaPA135 5,223 135 5,223 5,358 3,953 1,405 19601995 35 years
Kindred Hospital - ChattanoogaChattanoogaTN756 4,415 756 4,415 5,171 4,344 827 19751993 22 years
Ardent Harrington Cancer CenterAmarilloTX974 25,304 974 25,304 26,278 120 26,158 2020202035 years
122


 Location Initial Cost to Company Gross Amount Carried at Close of Period      
Property NameCity
State /
Province
Encumbrances
Land and
Improvements
Buildings and
Improvements
Costs
Capitalized
Subsequent
to Acquisition
Land and
Improvements
Buildings and
Improvements
Total
Accumulated
Depreciation
NBV
Year of
Construction
Year
Acquired
Life on
Which
Depreciation
in Income
Statement
is Computed
IRFS AND LTACS     
  
  
  
  
 
  
   
Rehabilitation Hospital of Southern ArizonaTucsonAZ$
$770
$25,589
$
$770
$25,589
$26,359
$4,920
$21,439
1992201135 years
Kindred Hospital - BreaBreaCA
3,144
2,611

3,144
2,611
5,755
1,467
4,288
1990199540 years
Kindred Hospital - OntarioOntarioCA
523
2,988

523
2,988
3,511
3,076
435
1950199425 years
Kindred Hospital - San DiegoSan DiegoCA
670
11,764

670
11,764
12,434
11,739
695
1965199425 years
Kindred Hospital - San Francisco Bay AreaSan LeandroCA
2,735
5,870

2,735
5,870
8,605
6,142
2,463
1962199325 years
Tustin Rehabilitation HospitalTustinCA
2,810
25,248

2,810
25,248
28,058
4,948
23,110
1991201135 years
Kindred Hospital - WestminsterWestminsterCA
727
7,384

727
7,384
8,111
7,562
549
1973199320 years
Kindred Hospital - DenverDenverCO
896
6,367

896
6,367
7,263
6,711
552
1963199420 years
Kindred Hospital - South Florida - Coral GablesCoral GablesFL
1,071
5,348

1,071
5,348
6,419
5,008
1,411
1956199230 years
Kindred Hospital - South Florida Ft. LauderdaleFort LauderdaleFL
1,758
14,080

1,758
14,080
15,838
13,973
1,865
1969198930 years
Kindred Hospital - North FloridaGreen Cove SpringsFL
145
4,613

145
4,613
4,758
4,642
116
1956199420 years
Kindred Hospital - South Florida - HollywoodHollywoodFL
605
5,229

605
5,229
5,834
5,234
600
1937199520 years
Kindred Hospital - Bay Area St. PetersburgSt. PetersburgFL
1,401
16,706

1,401
16,706
18,107
14,787
3,320
1968199740 years
Kindred Hospital - Central TampaTampaFL
2,732
7,676

2,732
7,676
10,408
5,294
5,114
1970199340 years
Kindred Hospital - Chicago (North Campus)ChicagoIL
1,583
19,980

1,583
19,980
21,563
19,711
1,852
1949199525 years
Kindred - Chicago - LakeshoreChicagoIL
1,513
9,525

1,513
9,525
11,038
9,474
1,564
1995197620 years
Kindred Hospital - Chicago (Northlake Campus)NorthlakeIL
850
6,498

850
6,498
7,348
6,198
1,150
1960199130 years
Kindred Hospital - SycamoreSycamoreIL
77
8,549

77
8,549
8,626
8,297
329
1949199320 years
Kindred Hospital - IndianapolisIndianapolisIN
985
3,801

985
3,801
4,786
3,566
1,220
1955199330 years
Kindred Hospital - LouisvilleLouisvilleKY
3,041
12,279

3,041
12,279
15,320
12,536
2,784
1964199520 years
Kindred Hospital - St. LouisSt. LouisMO
1,126
2,087

1,126
2,087
3,213
1,948
1,265
1984199140 years
Kindred Hospital - Las Vegas (Sahara)Las VegasNV
1,110
2,177

1,110
2,177
3,287
1,448
1,839
1980199440 years
Lovelace Rehabilitation HospitalAlbuquerqueNM
401
17,186
1,415
401
18,601
19,002
1,329
17,673
1989201536 years
Kindred Hospital - AlbuquerqueAlbuquerqueNM
11
4,253

11
4,253
4,264
2,961
1,303
1985199340 years
Kindred Hospital - GreensboroGreensboroNC
1,010
7,586

1,010
7,586
8,596
7,686
910
1964199420 years

 Location Initial Cost to CompanyGross Amount Carried at Close of Period   
Property NameCityState /
Province
EncumbrancesLand and
Improvements
Buildings and
Improvements
Costs
Capitalized
Subsequent
to Acquisition1
Land and
Improvements
Buildings and
Improvements
TotalAccumulated
Depreciation
NBVYear of
Construction
Year
Acquired
Life on
Which
Depreciation
in Income
Statement
Is Computed
Kindred Hospital - ArlingtonArlingtonTX458 12,426 458 12,426 12,884 172 12,712 1970202035 years
Rehabilitation Hospital of DallasDallasTX2,318 38,702 2,318 38,702 41,020 7,178 33,842 2009201535 years
Baylor Institute for Rehabilitation - Ft. Worth TXFort WorthTX2,071 16,018 2,071 16,018 18,089 3,201 14,888 2008201535 years
Kindred Hospital - Tarrant County (Fort Worth Southwest)Fort WorthTX2,342 7,458 2,342 7,458 9,800 7,508 2,292 19871986 20 years
Rehabilitation Hospital The VintageHoustonTX1,838 34,832 1,838 34,832 36,670 6,735 29,935 2012201535 years
Kindred Hospital (Houston Northwest)HoustonTX1,699 6,788 1,699 6,788 8,487 6,231 2,256 19861985 40 years
Kindred Hospital - HoustonHoustonTX33 7,062 33 7,062 7,095 6,756 339 19721994 20 years
Select Rehabilitation - San Antonio TXSan AntonioTX1,859 18,301 1,859 18,301 20,160 3,591 16,569 2010201535 years
Kindred Hospital - San AntonioSan AntonioTX249 11,413 249 11,413 11,662 10,579 1,083 19811993 30 years
TOTAL FOR SPECIALTY HOSPITALS0 48,226 440,390 68 47,226 441,458 488,684 245,253 243,431 
SKILLED NURSING FACILITIES          
Englewood Post Acute and RehabilitationEnglewoodCO241 2,180 194 241 2,374 2,615 2,206 409 19601995 30 years
Brookdale Lisle SNFLisleIL730 9,270 735 910 9,825 10,735 3,696 7,039 19902009 35 years
Lopatcong CenterPhillipsburgNJ1,490 12,336 1,490 12,336 13,826 7,207 6,619 19822004 30 years
The BelvedereChesterPA822 7,203 822 7,203 8,025 4,200 3,825 18992004 30 years
Pennsburg ManorPennsburgPA1,091 7,871 1,091 7,871 8,962 4,631 4,331 19822004 30 years
Chapel ManorPhiladelphiaPA1,595 13,982 1,358 1,595 15,340 16,935 9,511 7,424 19482004 30 years
Wayne CenterStraffordPA662 6,872 850 662 7,722 8,384 4,836 3,548 18972004 30 years
Everett Rehabilitation & CareEverettWA2,750 27,337 (7,916)2,750 19,421 22,171 7,707 14,464 1995201135 years
Beacon Hill RehabilitationLongviewWA145 2,563 171 145 2,734 2,879 2,670 209 19551992 29 years
Columbia Crest Care & Rehabilitation CenterMoses LakeWA660 17,439 660 17,439 18,099 5,080 13,019 1972201135 years
Lake Ridge Solana Alzheimer's Care CenterMoses LakeWA660 8,866 660 8,866 9,526 2,669 6,857 1988201135 years
Rainier RehabilitationPuyallupWA520 4,780 305 520 5,085 5,605 3,794 1,811 19861991 40 years
Logan CenterLoganWV300 12,959 300 12,959 13,259 3,717 9,542 1987201135 years
Ravenswood Healthcare CenterRavenswoodWV320 12,710 320 12,710 13,030 3,661 9,369 1987201135 years
Valley CenterSouth CharlestonWV750 24,115 750 24,115 24,865 7,004 17,861 1987201135 years
White SulphurWhite Sulphur SpringsWV250 13,055 250 13,055 13,305 3,781 9,524 1987201135 years
TOTAL FOR SKILLED NURSING FACILITIES0 12,986 183,538 (4,303)13,166 179,055 192,221 76,370 115,851 
GENERAL ACUTE CARE
Lovelace Medical Center DowntownAlbuquerqueNM9,840 154,017 9,763 9,928 163,692 173,620 30,465 143,155 1968201533.5 years
Lovelace Westside HospitalAlbuquerqueNM10,107 13,576 2,133 10,107 15,709 25,816 6,742 19,074 1984201520.5 years
Lovelace Women's HospitalAlbuquerqueNM7,236 175,142 20,075 7,236 195,217 202,453 24,062 178,391 1983201547 years
Roswell Regional HospitalRoswellNM2,560 41,125 2,186 2,560 43,311 45,871 5,825 40,046 2007201547 years
Hillcrest Hospital ClaremoreClaremoreOK3,623 23,864 638 3,623 24,502 28,125 4,108 24,017 1955201540 years
123


 Location Initial Cost to Company Gross Amount Carried at Close of Period      
Property NameCity
State /
Province
Encumbrances
Land and
Improvements
Buildings and
Improvements
Costs
Capitalized
Subsequent
to Acquisition
Land and
Improvements
Buildings and
Improvements
Total
Accumulated
Depreciation
NBV
Year of
Construction
Year
Acquired
Life on
Which
Depreciation
in Income
Statement
is Computed
University Hospitals Rehabilitation HospitalBeachwoodOH
1,800
16,444

1,800
16,444
18,244
2,236
16,008
2013201335 years
Kindred Hospital - PhiladelphiaPhiladelphiaPA
135
5,223

135
5,223
5,358
3,514
1,844
1960199535 years
Kindred Hospital - ChattanoogaChattanoogaTN
756
4,415

756
4,415
5,171
4,176
995
1975199322 years
Rehabilitation Hospital of DallasDallasTX
2,318
38,702

2,318
38,702
41,020
3,591
37,429
2009201535 years
Baylor Institute for Rehabilition - Ft. Worth TXFort WorthTX
2,071
16,018

2,071
16,018
18,089
1,613
16,476
2008201535 years
Kindred Hospital - Tarrant County (Fort Worth Southwest)Fort WorthTX
2,342
7,458

2,342
7,458
9,800
7,505
2,295
1987198620 years
Rehabilitation Hospital The VintageHoustonTX
1,838
34,832

1,838
34,832
36,670
3,390
33,280
2012201535 years
Kindred Hospital (Houston Northwest)HoustonTX
1,699
6,788

1,699
6,788
8,487
5,778
2,709
1986198540 years
Kindred Hospital - HoustonHoustonTX
33
7,062

33
7,062
7,095
6,667
428
1972199420 years
Kindred Hospital - MansfieldMansfieldTX
267
2,462

267
2,462
2,729
2,015
714
1983199040 years
Select Rehabilitation - San Antonio TXSan AntonioTX
1,859
18,301

1,859
18,301
20,160
1,807
18,353
2010201535 years
Kindred Hospital - San AntonioSan AntonioTX
249
11,413

249
11,413
11,662
9,533
2,129
1981199330 years
TOTAL FOR IRFS AND LTACS  
47,061
404,512
1,415
47,061
405,927
452,988
222,482
230,506
   
SKILLED NURSING FACILITIES  

  
  
  
  
  
   
    
Englewood Post Acute and RehabilitationEnglewoodCO
241
2,180
194
241
2,374
2,615
2,015
600
1960199530 years
Brookdale Lisle SNFLisleIL
730
9,270

730
9,270
10,000
2,863
7,137
1990200935 years
Lopatcong CenterPhillipsburgNJ
1,490
12,336

1,490
12,336
13,826
6,031
7,795
1982200430 years
Marietta Convalescent CenterMariettaOH
158
3,266
75
158
3,341
3,499
3,288
211
1972199325 years
The BelvedereChesterPA
822
7,203

822
7,203
8,025
3,511
4,514
1899200430 years
Pennsburg ManorPennsburgPA
1,091
7,871

1,091
7,871
8,962
3,889
5,073
1982200430 years
Chapel ManorPhiladelphiaPA
1,595
13,982
1,358
1,595
15,340
16,935
7,805
9,130
1948200430 years
Wayne CenterStraffordPA
662
6,872
850
662
7,722
8,384
4,148
4,236
1897200430 years
Everett Rehabilitation & CareEverettWA
2,750
27,337

2,750
27,337
30,087
5,456
24,631
1995201135 years
Northwest Continuum Care CenterLongviewWA
145
2,563
171
145
2,734
2,879
2,377
502
1955199229 years
Columbia Crest Care & Rehabilitation CenterMoses LakeWA
660
17,439

660
17,439
18,099
3,564
14,535
1972201135 years
Lake Ridge Solana Alzheimer's Care CenterMoses LakeWA
660
8,866

660
8,866
9,526
1,886
7,640
1988201135 years
Rainier Vista Care CenterPuyallupWA
520
4,780
305
520
5,085
5,605
3,355
2,250
1986199140 years
Logan CenterLoganWV
300
12,959

300
12,959
13,259
2,597
10,662
1987201135 years
Ravenswood Healthcare CenterRavenswoodWV
320
12,710

320
12,710
13,030
2,556
10,474
1987201135 years
Valley CenterSouth CharlestonWV
750
24,115

750
24,115
24,865
4,897
19,968
1987201135 years
White SulphurWhite Sulphur SpringsWV
250
13,055

250
13,055
13,305
2,641
10,664
1987201135 years
TOTAL FOR SKILLED NURSING FACILITIES  
13,144
186,804
2,953
13,144
189,757
202,901
62,879
140,022
   
               
HEALTH SYSTEMS  
          

 Location Initial Cost to CompanyGross Amount Carried at Close of Period   
Property NameCityState /
Province
EncumbrancesLand and
Improvements
Buildings and
Improvements
Costs
Capitalized
Subsequent
to Acquisition1
Land and
Improvements
Buildings and
Improvements
TotalAccumulated
Depreciation
NBVYear of
Construction
Year
Acquired
Life on
Which
Depreciation
in Income
Statement
Is Computed
Bailey Medical CenterOwassoOK4,964 7,059 155 4,964 7,214 12,178 1,826 10,352 2006201532.5 years
Hillcrest Medical CenterTulsaOK28,319 215,959 12,718 28,319 228,677 256,996 40,988 216,008 1928201534 years
Hillcrest Hospital SouthTulsaOK17,026 112,231 1,016 17,026 113,247 130,273 16,857 113,416 1999201540 years
SouthCreek Medical PlazaTulsaOK2,943 17,860 600 2,943 18,460 21,403 1,451 19,952 2003201835 years
Baptist St. Anthony's HospitalAmarilloTX13,779 357,733 26,812 13,015 385,309 398,324 49,670 348,654 1967201544.5 years
Spire Hull and East Riding HospitalAnlabyHUL3,194 81,613 (10,348)2,804 71,655 74,459 9,881 64,578 2010201450 years
Spire Fylde Coast HospitalBlackpoolLAN2,446 28,896 (3,825)2,147 25,370 27,517 3,550 23,967 1980201450 years
Spire Clare Park HospitalFarnhamSUR6,263 26,119 (3,951)5,499 22,932 28,431 3,336 25,095 2009201450 years
TOTAL FOR GENERAL ACUTE CARE0 112,300 1,255,194 57,972 110,171 1,315,295 1,425,466 198,761 1,226,705 
BROOKDALE SENIOR HOUSING COMMUNITIES
Brookdale Chandler Ray RoadChandlerAZ2,000 6,538 178 2,000 6,716 8,716 2,070 6,646 1998201135 years
Brookdale Springs MesaMesaAZ2,747 24,918 2,720 2,751 27,634 30,385 13,025 17,360 1986200535 years
Brookdale East ArborMesaAZ655 6,998 489 711 7,431 8,142 3,582 4,560 1998200535 years
Brookdale Oro ValleyOro ValleyAZ666 6,169 666 6,169 6,835 3,123 3,712 1998200535 years
Brookdale PeoriaPeoriaAZ598 4,872 723 659 5,534 6,193 2,603 3,590 1998200535 years
Brookdale TempeTempeAZ611 4,066 150 611 4,216 4,827 2,093 2,734 1997200535 years
Brookdale East TucsonTucsonAZ506 4,745 50 556 4,745 5,301 2,406 2,895 1998200535 years
Brookdale AnaheimAnaheimCA2,464 7,908 95 2,464 8,003 10,467 3,833 6,634 1977200535 years
Brookdale Redwood CityRedwood CityCA7,669 66,691 422 7,719 67,063 74,782 34,159 40,623 1988200535 years
Brookdale San JoseSan JoseCA6,240 66,329 14,386 6,250 80,705 86,955 36,374 50,581 1987200535 years
Brookdale San MarcosSan MarcosCA4,288 36,204 235 4,314 36,413 40,727 18,666 22,061 1987200535 years
Brookdale TracyTracyCA1,110 13,296 521 1,110 13,817 14,927 6,173 8,754 1986200535 years
Brookdale Boulder CreekBoulderCO1,290 20,683 782 1,414 21,341 22,755 6,152 16,603 1985201135 years
Brookdale Vista GrandeColorado SpringsCO715 9,279 715 9,279 9,994 4,698 5,296 1997200535 years
Brookdale El CaminoPuebloCO840 9,403 76 874 9,445 10,319 4,773 5,546 1997200535 years
Brookdale FarmingtonFarmingtonCT3,995 36,310 958 4,340 36,923 41,263 18,531 22,732 1984200535 years
Brookdale South WindsorSouth WindsorCT2,187 12,682 88 2,198 12,759 14,957 6,097 8,860 1999200435 years
Brookdale ChatfieldWest HartfordCT2,493 22,833 23,729 2,493 46,562 49,055 15,041 34,014 1989200535 years
Brookdale Bonita SpringsBonita SpringsFL1,540 10,783 1,275 1,594 12,004 13,598 5,518 8,080 1989200535 years
Brookdale West Boynton BeachBoynton BeachFL2,317 16,218 1,353 2,347 17,541 19,888 8,137 11,751 1999200535 years
Brookdale Deer Creek AL/MCDeerfield BeachFL1,399 9,791 18 1,399 9,809 11,208 5,091 6,117 1999200535 years
Brookdale Fort Myers The ColonyFort MyersFL1,510 7,862 398 1,510 8,260 9,770 2,333 7,437 1996201135 years
Brookdale AvondaleJacksonvilleFL860 16,745 140 860 16,885 17,745 4,762 12,983 1997201135 years
Brookdale Crown PointJacksonvilleFL1,300 9,659 611 1,300 10,270 11,570 2,888 8,682 1997201135 years
Brookdale Jensen BeachJensen BeachFL1,831 12,820 2,100 1,831 14,920 16,751 6,472 10,279 1999200535 years
Brookdale Ormond Beach WestOrmond BeachFL1,660 9,738 27 1,660 9,765 11,425 2,820 8,605 1997201135 years
Brookdale Palm CoastPalm CoastFL470 9,187 235 470 9,422 9,892 2,669 7,223 1997201135 years
124


 Location Initial Cost to Company Gross Amount Carried at Close of Period      
Property NameCity
State /
Province
Encumbrances
Land and
Improvements
Buildings and
Improvements
Costs
Capitalized
Subsequent
to Acquisition
Land and
Improvements
Buildings and
Improvements
Total
Accumulated
Depreciation
NBV
Year of
Construction
Year
Acquired
Life on
Which
Depreciation
in Income
Statement
is Computed
Lovelace Medical Center DowntownAlbuquerqueNM
9,840
156,535
5,319
9,928
161,766
171,694
12,499
159,195
1968201533 years
Lovelace Westside HospitalAlbuquerqueNM
10,107
18,501
(3,873)10,107
14,628
24,735
2,879
21,856
1984201520 years
Lovelace Women's HospitalAlbuquerqueNM
7,236
183,866
10,317
7,236
194,183
201,419
10,423
190,996
1983201547 years
Roswell Regional HospitalRoswellNM
2,560
41,164
1,509
2,560
42,673
45,233
2,380
42,853
2007201547 years
Hillcrest Hospital ClaremoreClaremoreOK
3,623
34,359
(10,268)3,623
24,091
27,714
1,716
25,998
1955201540 years
Bailey Medical CenterOwassoOK
4,964
8,969
(1,782)4,964
7,187
12,151
799
11,352
2006201532 years
Hillcrest Medical CenterTulsaOK
28,319
215,199
8,605
28,319
223,804
252,123
16,487
235,636
1928201534 years
Hillcrest Hospital SouthTulsaOK
17,026
100,892
12,243
17,026
113,135
130,161
7,535
122,626
1999201540 years
Baptist St. Anthony's HospitalAmarilloTX
13,779
358,029
13,713
13,015
372,506
385,521
20,940
364,581
1967201544 years
Spire Hull and East Riding HospitalAnlabyUK
3,194
81,613
(11,223)2,771
70,813
73,584
5,425
68,159
2010201450 years
Spire Fylde Coast HospitalBlackpoolUK
2,446
28,896
(4,148)2,122
25,072
27,194
1,949
25,245
1980201450 years
Spire Clare Park HospitalFarnhamUK
6,263
26,119
(4,286)5,434
22,662
28,096
1,831
26,265
2009201450 years
TOTAL FOR HEALTH SYSTEMS  
109,357
1,254,142
16,126
107,105
1,272,520
1,379,625
84,863
1,294,762
   
BROOKDALE SENIORS HOUSING COMMUNITIES              
Brookdale Chandler Ray RoadChandlerAZ
2,000
6,538

2,000
6,538
8,538
1,418
7,120
1998201135 years
Brookdale Springs MesaMesaAZ
2,747
24,918

2,747
24,918
27,665
10,793
16,872
1986200535 years
Brookdale East ArborMesaAZ
655
6,998

655
6,998
7,653
3,009
4,644
1998200535 years
Brookdale Oro ValleyOro ValleyAZ
666
6,169

666
6,169
6,835
2,653
4,182
1998200535 years
Brookdale PeoriaPeoriaAZ
598
4,872

598
4,872
5,470
2,095
3,375
1998200535 years
Brookdale TempeTempeAZ
611
4,066

611
4,066
4,677
1,748
2,929
1997200535 years
Brookdale East TucsonTucsonAZ
506
4,745

506
4,745
5,251
2,040
3,211
1998200535 years
Brookdale AnaheimAnaheimCA
2,464
7,908

2,464
7,908
10,372
3,148
7,224
1977200535 years
Brookdale Redwood CityRedwood CityCA
7,669
66,691

7,669
66,691
74,360
29,097
45,263
1988200535 years
Brookdale San JoseSan JoseCA
6,240
66,329
12,838
6,240
79,167
85,407
29,510
55,897
1987200535 years
Brookdale San MarcosSan MarcosCA
4,288
36,204

4,288
36,204
40,492
15,879
24,613
1987200535 years
Brookdale TracyTracyCA
1,110
13,296

1,110
13,296
14,406
4,974
9,432
1986200535 years
Brookdale Boulder CreekBoulderCO
1,290
20,683

1,290
20,683
21,973
4,217
17,756
1985201135 years
Brookdale Vista GrandeColorado SpringsCO
715
9,279

715
9,279
9,994
3,990
6,004
1997200535 years
Brookdale El CaminoPuebloCO4,773
840
9,403

840
9,403
10,243
4,043
6,200
1997200535 years
Brookdale FarmingtonFarmingtonCT
3,995
36,310

3,995
36,310
40,305
15,722
24,583
1984200535 years
Brookdale South WindsorSouth WindsorCT
2,187
12,682

2,187
12,682
14,869
5,004
9,865
1999200435 years
Brookdale ChatfieldWest HartfordCT
2,493
22,833
22,296
2,493
45,129
47,622
10,806
36,816
1989200535 years
Brookdale Bonita SpringsBonita SpringsFL8,599
1,540
10,783

1,540
10,783
12,323
4,580
7,743
1989200535 years
Brookdale West Boynton BeachBoynton BeachFL13,178
2,317
16,218

2,317
16,218
18,535
6,731
11,804
1999200535 years
Brookdale Deer Creek AL/MCDeerfield BeachFL
1,399
9,791

1,399
9,791
11,190
4,369
6,821
1999200535 years
Brookdale Fort Myers The ColonyFort MyersFL
1,510
7,862

1,510
7,862
9,372
1,587
7,785
1996201135 years
Brookdale AvondaleJacksonvilleFL
860
16,745

860
16,745
17,605
3,264
14,341
1997201135 years

 Location Initial Cost to CompanyGross Amount Carried at Close of Period   
Property NameCityState /
Province
EncumbrancesLand and
Improvements
Buildings and
Improvements
Costs
Capitalized
Subsequent
to Acquisition1
Land and
Improvements
Buildings and
Improvements
TotalAccumulated
Depreciation
NBVYear of
Construction
Year
Acquired
Life on
Which
Depreciation
in Income
Statement
Is Computed
Brookdale PensacolaPensacolaFL633 6,087 11 633 6,098 6,731 3,086 3,645 1998200535 years
Brookdale RotondaRotonda WestFL1,740 4,331 282 1,740 4,613 6,353 1,536 4,817 1997201135 years
Brookdale Centre Pointe BoulevardTallahasseeFL667 6,168 667 6,168 6,835 3,123 3,712 1998200535 years
Brookdale TavaresTavaresFL280 15,980 69 280 16,049 16,329 4,522 11,807 1997201135 years
Brookdale West Melbourne MCWest MelbourneFL586 5,481 586 5,481 6,067 2,775 3,292 2000200535 years
Brookdale West Palm BeachWest Palm BeachFL3,758 33,072 3,762 3,935 36,657 40,592 17,139 23,453 1990200535 years
Brookdale Winter Haven MCWinter HavenFL232 3,006 232 3,006 3,238 1,522 1,716 1997200535 years
Brookdale Winter Haven ALWinter HavenFL438 5,549 183 438 5,732 6,170 2,831 3,339 1997200535 years
Brookdale Twin FallsTwin FallsID703 6,153 1,099 718 7,237 7,955 3,321 4,634 1997200535 years
Brookdale Lake Shore DriveChicagoIL11,057 107,517 7,721 11,089 115,206 126,295 56,926 69,369 1990200535 years
Brookdale Lake ViewChicagoIL3,072 26,668 3,072 26,668 29,740 13,650 16,090 1950200535 years
Brookdale Des PlainesDes PlainesIL6,871 60,165 (41)6,805 60,190 66,995 30,777 36,218 1993200535 years
Brookdale Hoffman EstatesHoffman EstatesIL3,886 44,130 4,702 4,273 48,445 52,718 22,773 29,945 1987200535 years
Brookdale Lisle IL/ALLisleIL33,000 7,953 70,400 7,953 70,400 78,353 35,944 42,409 1990200535 years
Brookdale NorthbrookNorthbrookIL1,988 39,762 854 2,076 40,528 42,604 19,573 23,031 1999200435 years
Brookdale Hawthorn Lakes IL/ALVernon HillsIL4,439 35,044 814 4,480 35,817 40,297 18,338 21,959 1987200535 years
Brookdale Hawthorn Lakes ALVernon HillsIL1,147 10,041 401 1,175 10,414 11,589 5,163 6,426 1999200535 years
Brookdale RichmondRichmondIN495 4,124 359 555 4,423 4,978 2,158 2,820 1998200535 years
Brookdale DerbyDerbyKS440 4,422 440 4,422 4,862 1,299 3,563 1994201135 years
Brookdale Leawood State LineLeawoodKS117 5,127 261 117 5,388 5,505 2,631 2,874 2000200535 years
Brookdale Salina FairdaleSalinaKS300 5,657 150 353 5,754 6,107 1,681 4,426 1996201135 years
Brookdale TopekaTopekaKS370 6,825 370 6,825 7,195 3,455 3,740 2000200535 years
Brookdale Cushing ParkFraminghamMA5,819 33,361 3,996 5,872 37,304 43,176 17,179 25,997 1999200435 years
Brookdale Cape CodHyannisMA1,277 9,063 237 1,277 9,300 10,577 4,193 6,384 1999200535 years
Brookdale Quincy BayQuincyMA6,101 57,862 3,713 6,216 61,460 67,676 29,724 37,952 1986200535 years
Brookdale Delta MCDelta TownshipMI730 11,471 119 730 11,590 12,320 3,298 9,022 1998201135 years
Brookdale Delta ALDelta TownshipMI820 3,313 30 820 3,343 4,163 1,327 2,836 1998201135 years
Brookdale Farmington Hills NorthFarmington HillsMI580 10,497 91 580 10,588 11,168 3,369 7,799 1994201135 years
Brookdale Farmington Hills North IIFarmington HillsMI700 10,246 700 10,246 10,946 3,394 7,552 1994201135 years
Brookdale Meridian ALHaslettMI1,340 6,134 288 1,367 6,395 7,762 1,910 5,852 1998201135 years
Brookdale Grand Blanc MCHollyMI450 12,373 105 450 12,478 12,928 3,572 9,356 1998201135 years
Brookdale Grand Blanc ALHollyMI620 14,627 620 14,627 15,247 4,211 11,036 1998201135 years
Brookdale NorthvilleNorthvilleMI407 6,068 149 407 6,217 6,624 3,082 3,542 1996200535 years
Brookdale Troy MCTroyMI630 17,178 630 17,178 17,808 4,900 12,908 1998201135 years
Brookdale Troy ALTroyMI950 12,503 270 950 12,773 13,723 3,786 9,937 1998201135 years
125
 Location Initial Cost to Company Gross Amount Carried at Close of Period      
Property NameCity
State /
Province
Encumbrances
Land and
Improvements
Buildings and
Improvements
Costs
Capitalized
Subsequent
to Acquisition
Land and
Improvements
Buildings and
Improvements
Total
Accumulated
Depreciation
NBV
Year of
Construction
Year
Acquired
Life on
Which
Depreciation
in Income
Statement
is Computed
Brookdale Crown PointJacksonvilleFL
1,300
9,659

1,300
9,659
10,959
1,927
9,032
1997201135 years
Brookdale Jensen BeachJensen BeachFL11,825
1,831
12,820

1,831
12,820
14,651
5,431
9,220
1999200535 years
Brookdale Ormond Beach WestOrmond BeachFL
1,660
9,738

1,660
9,738
11,398
1,957
9,441
1997201135 years
Brookdale Palm CoastPalm CoastFL
470
9,187

470
9,187
9,657
1,861
7,796
1997201135 years
Brookdale PensacolaPensacolaFL
633
6,087

633
6,087
6,720
2,617
4,103
1998200535 years
Brookdale RotondaRotonda WestFL
1,740
4,331

1,740
4,331
6,071
1,043
5,028
1997201135 years
Brookdale Centre Pointe BoulevardTallahasseeFL4,239
667
6,168

667
6,168
6,835
2,652
4,183
1998200535 years
Brookdale TavaresTavaresFL
280
15,980

280
15,980
16,260
3,129
13,131
1997201135 years
Brookdale West Melbourne MCWest MelbourneFL6,041
586
5,481

586
5,481
6,067
2,357
3,710
2000200535 years
Brookdale West Palm BeachWest Palm BeachFL
3,758
33,072

3,758
33,072
36,830
14,400
22,430
1990200535 years
Brookdale Winter Haven MCWinter HavenFL
232
3,006

232
3,006
3,238
1,293
1,945
1997200535 years
Brookdale Winter Haven ALWinter HavenFL
438
5,549

438
5,549
5,987
2,386
3,601
1997200535 years
Brookdale Twin FallsTwin FallsID
703
6,153

703
6,153
6,856
2,646
4,210
1997200535 years
Brookdale Lake Shore DriveChicagoIL
11,057
107,517
3,266
11,057
110,783
121,840
47,637
74,203
1990200535 years
Brookdale Lake ViewChicagoIL
3,072
26,668

3,072
26,668
29,740
11,639
18,101
1950200535 years
Brookdale Des PlainesDes PlainesIL32,000
6,871
60,165
(41)6,805
60,190
66,995
26,219
40,776
1993200535 years
Brookdale Hoffman EstatesHoffman EstatesIL
3,886
44,130

3,886
44,130
48,016
18,461
29,555
1987200535 years
Brookdale Lisle IL/ALLisleIL33,000
7,953
70,400

7,953
70,400
78,353
30,621
47,732
1990200535 years
Brookdale NorthbrookNorthbrookIL
1,988
39,762

1,988
39,762
41,750
16,011
25,739
1999200435 years
Brookdale Hawthorn Lakes IL/ALVernon HillsIL
4,439
35,044

4,439
35,044
39,483
15,563
23,920
1987200535 years
Brookdale Hawthorn Lakes ALVernon HillsIL
1,147
10,041

1,147
10,041
11,188
4,376
6,812
1999200535 years
Brookdale EvansvilleEvansvilleIN3,401
357
3,765

357
3,765
4,122
1,619
2,503
1998200535 years
Brookdale CastletonIndianapolisIN
1,280
11,515

1,280
11,515
12,795
4,994
7,801
1986200535 years
Brookdale Marion AL (IN)MarionIN
207
3,570

207
3,570
3,777
1,535
2,242
1998200535 years
Brookdale Portage ALPortageIN
128
3,649

128
3,649
3,777
1,569
2,208
1999200535 years
Brookdale RichmondRichmondIN
495
4,124

495
4,124
4,619
1,773
2,846
1998200535 years
Brookdale DerbyDerbyKS
440
4,422

440
4,422
4,862
911
3,951
1994201135 years
Brookdale Leawood State LineLeawoodKS3,463
117
5,127

117
5,127
5,244
2,205
3,039
2000200535 years
Brookdale Salina FairdaleSalinaKS
300
5,657

300
5,657
5,957
1,166
4,791
1996201135 years
Brookdale TopekaTopekaKS4,638
370
6,825

370
6,825
7,195
2,935
4,260
2000200535 years
Brookdale WellingtonWellingtonKS
310
2,434

310
2,434
2,744
542
2,202
1994201135 years
Brookdale Cushing ParkFraminghamMA
5,819
33,361
2,430
5,819
35,791
41,610
13,440
28,170
1999200435 years
Brookdale Cape CodHyannisMA
1,277
9,063

1,277
9,063
10,340
3,363
6,977
1999200535 years
Brookdale Quincy BayQuincyMA
6,101
57,862

6,101
57,862
63,963
24,877
39,086
1986200535 years
Brookdale DavisonDavisonMI
160
3,189
2,543
160
5,732
5,892
1,630
4,262
1997201135 years



 Location Initial Cost to CompanyGross Amount Carried at Close of Period   
Property NameCityState /
Province
EncumbrancesLand and
Improvements
Buildings and
Improvements
Costs
Capitalized
Subsequent
to Acquisition1
Land and
Improvements
Buildings and
Improvements
TotalAccumulated
Depreciation
NBVYear of
Construction
Year
Acquired
Life on
Which
Depreciation
in Income
Statement
is Computed
Brookdale Utica ALUticaMI1,142 11,808 691 1,142 12,499 13,641 6,096 7,545 1996200535 years
Brookdale Utica MCUticaMI700 8,657 351 700 9,008 9,708 2,712 6,996 1995201135 years
Brookdale Eden PrairieEden PrairieMN301 6,228 874 332 7,071 7,403 3,299 4,104 1998200535 years
Brookdale FaribaultFaribaultMN530 1,085 530 1,085 1,615 378 1,237 1997201135 years
Brookdale Inver Grove HeightsInver Grove HeightsMN253 2,655 253 2,655 2,908 1,344 1,564 1997200535 years
Brookdale MankatoMankatoMN490 410 490 410 900 262 638 1996201135 years
Brookdale EdinaMinneapolisMN15,040 3,621 33,141 22,975 3,621 56,116 59,737 21,058 38,679 1998200535 years
Brookdale North OaksNorth OaksMN1,057 8,296 1,312 1,122 9,543 10,665 4,421 6,244 1998200535 years
Brookdale PlymouthPlymouthMN679 8,675 801 823 9,332 10,155 4,487 5,668 1998200535 years
Brookdale WillmarWilmarMN470 4,833 470 4,833 5,303 1,396 3,907 1997201135 years
Brookdale WinonaWinonaMN800 1,390 800 1,390 2,190 803 1,387 1997201135 years
Brookdale West CountyBallwinMO3,100 35,074 323 3,113 35,384 38,497 7,232 31,265 2012201435 years
Brookdale EveshamVoorhees TownshipNJ3,158 29,909 343 3,158 30,252 33,410 15,164 18,246 1987200535 years
Brookdale WestamptonWestamptonNJ881 4,741 829 881 5,570 6,451 2,563 3,888 1997200535 years
Brookdale Santa FeSanta FeNM28,178 28,178 28,178 14,060 14,118 1986200535 years
Brookdale KenmoreBuffaloNY1,487 15,170 1,117 1,487 16,287 17,774 7,774 10,000 1995200535 years
Brookdale Clinton ILClintonNY947 7,528 643 961 8,157 9,118 3,911 5,207 1991200535 years
Brookdale ManliusManliusNY890 28,237 658 190 29,595 29,785 8,172 21,613 1994201135 years
Brookdale PittsfordPittsfordNY611 4,066 16 611 4,082 4,693 2,064 2,629 1997200535 years
Brookdale East NiskayunaSchenectadyNY1,021 8,333 715 1,021 9,048 10,069 4,374 5,695 1997200535 years
Brookdale NiskayunaSchenectadyNY1,884 16,103 30 1,884 16,133 18,017 8,160 9,857 1996200535 years
Brookdale SummerfieldSyracuseNY1,132 11,434 278 1,246 11,598 12,844 5,805 7,039 1991200535 years
Brookdale WilliamsvilleWilliamsvilleNY839 3,841 60 839 3,901 4,740 1,960 2,780 1997200535 years
Brookdale CaryCaryNC724 6,466 724 6,466 7,190 3,274 3,916 1997200535 years
Brookdale Falling CreekHickoryNC330 10,981 330 10,981 11,311 3,146 8,165 1997201135 years
Brookdale Winston-SalemWinston-SalemNC368 3,497 250 368 3,747 4,115 1,808 2,307 1997200535 years
Brookdale AllianceAllianceOH392 6,283 49 435 6,289 6,724 3,185 3,539 1998200535 years
Brookdale AustintownAustintownOH151 3,087 729 181 3,786 3,967 1,694 2,273 1999200535 years
Brookdale BarbertonBarbertonOH440 10,884 440 10,884 11,324 3,120 8,204 1997201135 years
Brookdale BeavercreekBeavercreekOH587 5,381 587 5,381 5,968 2,724 3,244 1998200535 years
Brookdale Centennial ParkClaytonOH630 6,477 630 6,477 7,107 1,924 5,183 1997201135 years
Brookdale WestervilleColumbusOH267 3,600 267 3,600 3,867 1,823 2,044 1999200535 years
Brookdale Greenville AL/MCGreenvilleOH490 4,144 55 545 4,144 4,689 1,376 3,313 1997201135 years
Brookdale Lakeview CrossingGroveportOH705 11,103 705 11,103 11,808 150 11,658 1998202035 years
Brookdale Camelot Medina (North)MedinaOH263 6,602 263 6,602 6,865 108 6,757 1995202035 years
Brookdale Medina SouthMedinaOH802 22,124 802 22,124 22,926 293 02000202035 years
Brookdale Mount VernonMount VernonOH854 22,882 854 22,882 23,736 298 02002202035 years
Brookdale Salem AL (OH)SalemOH634 4,659 634 4,659 5,293 2,359 2,934 1998200535 years
126


 Location Initial Cost to Company Gross Amount Carried at Close of Period      
Property NameCity
State /
Province
Encumbrances
Land and
Improvements
Buildings and
Improvements
Costs
Capitalized
Subsequent
to Acquisition
Land and
Improvements
Buildings and
Improvements
Total
Accumulated
Depreciation
NBV
Year of
Construction
Year
Acquired
Life on
Which
Depreciation
in Income
Statement
is Computed
Brookdale Delta MCDelta TownshipMI
730
11,471

730
11,471
12,201
2,283
9,918
1998201135 years
Brookdale Delta ALDelta TownshipMI
820
3,313

820
3,313
4,133
922
3,211
1998201135 years
Brookdale Farmington Hills NorthFarmington HillsMI
580
10,497

580
10,497
11,077
2,338
8,739
1994201135 years
Brookdale Farmington Hills North IIFarmington HillsMI
700
10,246

700
10,246
10,946
2,370
8,576
1994201135 years
Brookdale Meridian ALHaslettMI
1,340
6,134

1,340
6,134
7,474
1,351
6,123
1998201135 years
Brookdale Grand Blanc MCHollyMI
450
12,373

450
12,373
12,823
2,469
10,354
1998201135 years
Brookdale Grand Blanc ALHollyMI
620
14,627

620
14,627
15,247
2,944
12,303
1998201135 years
Brookdale NorthvilleNorthvilleMI6,820
407
6,068

407
6,068
6,475
2,609
3,866
1996200535 years
Brookdale Troy MCTroyMI
630
17,178

630
17,178
17,808
3,394
14,414
1998201135 years
Brookdale Troy ALTroyMI
950
12,503

950
12,503
13,453
2,634
10,819
1998201135 years
Brookdale Utica ALUticaMI
1,142
11,808

1,142
11,808
12,950
5,077
7,873
1996200535 years
Brookdale Utica MCUticaMI
700
8,657

700
8,657
9,357
1,837
7,520
1995201135 years
Brookdale Eden PrairieEden PrairieMN
301
6,228

301
6,228
6,529
2,678
3,851
1998200535 years
Brookdale FaribaultFaribaultMN
530
1,085

530
1,085
1,615
275
1,340
1997201135 years
Brookdale Inver Grove HeightsInver Grove HeightsMN2,716
253
2,655

253
2,655
2,908
1,142
1,766
1997200535 years
Brookdale MankatoMankatoMN
490
410

490
410
900
195
705
1996201135 years
Brookdale EdinaMinneapolisMN15,040
3,621
33,141
22,975
3,621
56,116
59,737
16,010
43,727
1998200535 years
Brookdale North OaksNorth OaksMN
1,057
8,296

1,057
8,296
9,353
3,567
5,786
1998200535 years
Brookdale PlymouthPlymouthMN
679
8,675

679
8,675
9,354
3,730
5,624
1998200535 years
Brookdale WillmarWilmarMN
470
4,833

470
4,833
5,303
971
4,332
1997201135 years
Brookdale WinonaWinonaMN
800
1,390

800
1,390
2,190
565
1,625
1997201135 years
Brookdale West CountyBallwinMO
3,100
35,074
51
3,104
35,121
38,225
3,873
34,352
2012201435 years
Brookdale EveshamVoorhees TownshipNJ
3,158
29,909

3,158
29,909
33,067
12,861
20,206
1987200535 years
Brookdale WestamptonWestamptonNJ
881
4,741

881
4,741
5,622
2,039
3,583
1997200535 years
Brookdale Santa FeSanta FeNM

28,178


28,178
28,178
11,878
16,300
1986200535 years
Brookdale KenmoreBuffaloNY12,716
1,487
15,170

1,487
15,170
16,657
6,523
10,134
1995200535 years
Brookdale Clinton ILClintonNY
947
7,528

947
7,528
8,475
3,237
5,238
1991200535 years
Brookdale ManliusManliusNY
890
28,237

890
28,237
29,127
5,530
23,597
1994201135 years
Brookdale PittsfordPittsfordNY
611
4,066

611
4,066
4,677
1,748
2,929
1997200535 years
Brookdale East NiskayunaSchenectadyNY
1,021
8,333

1,021
8,333
9,354
3,583
5,771
1997200535 years
Brookdale NiskayunaSchenectadyNY15,895
1,884
16,103

1,884
16,103
17,987
6,924
11,063
1996200535 years
Brookdale SummerfieldSyracuseNY
1,132
11,434

1,132
11,434
12,566
4,916
7,650
1991200535 years
Brookdale WilliamsvilleWilliamsvilleNY6,574
839
3,841

839
3,841
4,680
1,652
3,028
1997200535 years
Brookdale CaryCaryNC
724
6,466

724
6,466
7,190
2,780
4,410
1997200535 years
Brookdale Falling CreekHickoryNC
330
10,981

330
10,981
11,311
2,187
9,124
1997201135 years
Brookdale Winston-SalemWinston-SalemNC
368
3,497

368
3,497
3,865
1,504
2,361
1997200535 years

 Location Initial Cost to CompanyGross Amount Carried at Close of Period   
Property NameCityState /
Province
EncumbrancesLand and
Improvements
Buildings and
Improvements
Costs
Capitalized
Subsequent
to Acquisition1
Land and
Improvements
Buildings and
Improvements
TotalAccumulated
Depreciation
NBVYear of
Construction
Year
Acquired
Life on
Which
Depreciation
in Income
Statement
is Computed
Brookdale SpringdaleSpringdaleOH1,140 9,134 656 1,228 9,702 10,930 2,702 8,228 1997201135 years
Brookdale ZanesvilleZanesvilleOH833 12,034 833 12,034 12,867 166 01996202035 years
Brookdale Bartlesville SouthBartlesvilleOK250 10,529 35 285 10,529 10,814 2,995 7,819 1997201135 years
Brookdale Broken ArrowBroken ArrowOK940 6,312 6,435 1,898 11,789 13,687 3,851 9,836 1996201135 years
Brookdale Forest GroveForest GroveOR2,320 9,633 (4,180)2,320 5,453 7,773 2,913 4,860 1994201135 years
Brookdale Mt. HoodGreshamOR2,410 9,093 (1,356)319 9,828 10,147 2,845 7,302 1988201135 years
Brookdale McMinnville Town CenterMcMinnvilleOR119 1,230 7,561 1,230 7,561 8,791 2,583 6,208 1989201135 years
Brookdale Denton NorthDentonTX1,750 6,712 43 1,750 6,755 8,505 1,974 6,531 1996201135 years
Brookdale EnnisEnnisTX460 3,284 460 3,284 3,744 1,026 2,718 1996201135 years
Brookdale KerrvilleKerrvilleTX460 8,548 120 460 8,668 9,128 2,459 6,669 1997201135 years
Brookdale Medical Center WhitbySan AntonioTX1,400 10,051 (5,953)1,400 4,098 5,498 2,794 2,704 1997201135 years
Brookdale Western HillsTempleTX330 5,081 230 330 5,311 5,641 1,568 4,073 1997201135 years
Brookdale Salem AL (VA)SalemVA1,900 16,219 1,900 16,219 18,119 8,097 10,022 1998201135 years
Brookdale AlderwoodLynnwoodWA1,219 9,573 810 1,239 10,363 11,602 4,868 6,734 1999200535 years
Brookdale Puyallup SouthPuyallupWA1,055 8,298 686 1,055 8,984 10,039 4,201 5,838 1998200535 years
Brookdale RichlandRichlandWA960 23,270 370 960 23,640 24,600 6,839 17,761 1990201135 years
Brookdale Park PlaceSpokaneWA1,622 12,895 910 1,622 13,805 15,427 6,700 8,727 1915200535 years
Brookdale Allenmore ALTacomaWA620 16,186 971 671 17,106 17,777 4,804 12,973 1997201135 years
Brookdale Allenmore - ILTacomaWA1,710 3,326 (622)307 4,107 4,414 1,599 2,815 1988201135 years
Brookdale YakimaYakimaWA860 15,276 119 891 15,364 16,255 4,499 11,756 1998201135 years
Brookdale KenoshaKenoshaWI551 5,431 3,297 608 8,671 9,279 3,836 5,443 2000200535 years
Brookdale LaCrosse MCLa CrosseWI621 4,056 1,126 621 5,182 5,803 2,452 3,351 2004200535 years
Brookdale LaCrosse ALLa CrosseWI644 5,831 2,637 644 8,468 9,112 3,886 5,226 1998200535 years
Brookdale Middleton Century AveMiddletonWI360 5,041 360 5,041 5,401 1,462 3,939 1997201135 years
Brookdale OnalaskaOnalaskaWI250 4,949 250 4,949 5,199 1,427 3,772 1995201135 years
Brookdale Sun PrairieSun PrairieWI350 1,131 350 1,131 1,481 391 1,090 1994201135 years
TOTAL FOR BROOKDALE SENIOR HOUSING COMMUNITIES48,159 185,432 1,810,548 120,817 184,852 1,931,945 2,116,797 799,971 1,316,826 
SUNRISE SENIOR HOUSING COMMUNITIES
Sunrise of ChandlerChandlerAZ4,344 14,455 1,386 4,459 15,726 20,185 4,780 15,405 2007201235 years
Sunrise of ScottsdaleScottsdaleAZ2,229 27,575 1,193 2,255 28,742 30,997 11,634 19,363 2007200735 years
Sunrise at River RoadTucsonAZ2,971 12,399 970 3,000 13,340 16,340 3,823 12,517 2008201235 years
Sunrise at La CostaCarlsbadCA4,890 20,590 1,985 5,030 22,435 27,465 9,658 17,807 1999200735 years
Sunrise of CarmichaelCarmichaelCA1,269 14,598 1,274 1,310 15,831 17,141 4,526 12,615 2009201235 years
Sunrise of Fair OaksFair OaksCA1,456 23,679 3,035 2,557 25,613 28,170 10,611 17,559 2001200735 years
Sunrise of Mission ViejoMission ViejoCA3,802 24,560 2,297 4,125 26,534 30,659 11,130 19,529 1998200735 years
Sunrise at Canyon CrestRiversideCA5,486 19,658 2,418 5,745 21,817 27,562 9,280 18,282 2006200735 years
Sunrise of RocklinRocklinCA1,378 23,565 1,786 1,525 25,204 26,729 10,351 16,378 2007200735 years
127


 Location Initial Cost to Company Gross Amount Carried at Close of Period      
Property NameCity
State /
Province
Encumbrances
Land and
Improvements
Buildings and
Improvements
Costs
Capitalized
Subsequent
to Acquisition
Land and
Improvements
Buildings and
Improvements
Total
Accumulated
Depreciation
NBV
Year of
Construction
Year
Acquired
Life on
Which
Depreciation
in Income
Statement
is Computed
Brookdale AllianceAllianceOH2,130
392
6,283

392
6,283
6,675
2,702
3,973
1998200535 years
Brookdale AustintownAustintownOH
151
3,087

151
3,087
3,238
1,327
1,911
1999200535 years
Brookdale BarbertonBarbertonOH
440
10,884

440
10,884
11,324
2,169
9,155
1997201135 years
Brookdale BeavercreekBeavercreekOH
587
5,381

587
5,381
5,968
2,314
3,654
1998200535 years
Brookdale Centennial ParkClaytonOH
630
6,477

630
6,477
7,107
1,351
5,756
1997201135 years
Brookdale WestervilleColumbusOH1,768
267
3,600

267
3,600
3,867
1,548
2,319
1999200535 years
Brookdale Greenville AL/MCGreenvilleOH
490
4,144

490
4,144
4,634
993
3,641
1997201135 years
Brookdale Marion AL/MC (OH)MarionOH
620
3,306

620
3,306
3,926
769
3,157
1998201135 years
Brookdale Salem AL (OH)SalemOH
634
4,659

634
4,659
5,293
2,003
3,290
1998200535 years
Brookdale SpringdaleSpringdaleOH
1,140
9,134

1,140
9,134
10,274
1,844
8,430
1997201135 years
Brookdale Bartlesville SouthBartlesvilleOK
250
10,529

250
10,529
10,779
2,073
8,706
1997201135 years
Brookdale BethanyBethanyOK
390
1,499

390
1,499
1,889
374
1,515
1994201135 years
Brookdale Broken ArrowBroken ArrowOK
940
6,312
6,410
1,873
11,789
13,662
2,436
11,226
1996201135 years
Brookdale Forest GroveForest GroveOR
2,320
9,633

2,320
9,633
11,953
2,118
9,835
1994201135 years
Brookdale Mt. HoodGreshamOR
2,410
9,093

2,410
9,093
11,503
2,001
9,502
1988201135 years
Brookdale McMinnville Town CenterMcMinnvilleOR1,051
1,230
7,561

1,230
7,561
8,791
1,837
6,954
1989201135 years
Brookdale Denton NorthDentonTX
1,750
6,712

1,750
6,712
8,462
1,372
7,090
1996201135 years
Brookdale EnnisEnnisTX
460
3,284

460
3,284
3,744
727
3,017
1996201135 years
Brookdale KerrvilleKerrvilleTX
460
8,548

460
8,548
9,008
1,706
7,302
1997201135 years
Brookdale Medical Center WhitbySan AntonioTX
1,400
10,051

1,400
10,051
11,451
2,031
9,420
1997201135 years
Brookdale Western HillsTempleTX
330
5,081

330
5,081
5,411
1,079
4,332
1997201135 years
Brookdale Salem AL (VA)SalemVA
1,900
16,219

1,900
16,219
18,119
6,696
11,423
1998201135 years
Brookdale AlderwoodLynnwoodWA
1,219
9,573

1,219
9,573
10,792
4,117
6,675
1999200535 years
Brookdale Puyallup SouthPuyallupWA9,268
1,055
8,298

1,055
8,298
9,353
3,568
5,785
1998200535 years
Brookdale RichlandRichlandWA
960
23,270

960
23,270
24,230
4,758
19,472
1990201135 years
Brookdale Park PlaceSpokaneWA
1,622
12,895

1,622
12,895
14,517
5,719
8,798
1915200535 years
Brookdale Allenmore ALTacomaWA
620
16,186

620
16,186
16,806
3,209
13,597
1997201135 years
Brookdale Allenmore - ILTacomaWA
1,710
3,326

1,710
3,326
5,036
999
4,037
1988201135 years
Brookdale YakimaYakimaWA
860
15,276

860
15,276
16,136
3,120
13,016
1998201135 years
Brookdale KenoshaKenoshaWI
551
5,431
2,772
551
8,203
8,754
3,077
5,677
2000200535 years
Brookdale LaCrosse MCLa CrosseWI
621
4,056
1,126
621
5,182
5,803
2,046
3,757
2004200535 years
Brookdale LaCrosse ALLa CrosseWI
644
5,831
2,637
644
8,468
9,112
3,215
5,897
1998200535 years
Brookdale Middleton Century AveMiddletonWI
360
5,041

360
5,041
5,401
1,016
4,385
1997201135 years
Brookdale OnalaskaOnalaskaWI
250
4,949

250
4,949
5,199
992
4,207
1995201135 years
Brookdale Sun PrairieSun PrairieWI
350
1,131

350
1,131
1,481
283
1,198
1994201135 years
TOTAL FOR BROOKDALE SENIORS HOUSING COMMUNITIES  199,135
185,427
1,768,730
79,303
186,298
1,847,162
2,033,460
655,647
1,377,813
   
SUNRISE SENIORS HOUSING COMMUNITIES             

 Location Initial Cost to CompanyGross Amount Carried at Close of Period   
Property NameCityState /
Province
EncumbrancesLand and
Improvements
Buildings and
Improvements
Costs
Capitalized
Subsequent
to Acquisition1
Land and
Improvements
Buildings and
Improvements
TotalAccumulated
Depreciation
NBVYear of
Construction
Year
Acquired
Life on
Which
Depreciation
in Income
Statement
is Computed
Sunrise of San MateoSan MateoCA2,682 35,335 3,557 2,742 38,832 41,574 15,571 26,003 1999200735 years
Sunrise of SunnyvaleSunnyvaleCA2,933 34,361 2,256 2,999 36,551 39,550 14,743 24,807 2000200735 years
Sunrise at Sterling CanyonValenciaCA3,868 29,293 5,211 4,108 34,264 38,372 15,149 23,223 1998200735 years
Sunrise of Westlake VillageWestlake VillageCA4,935 30,722 2,239 5,038 32,858 37,896 13,353 24,543 2004200735 years
Sunrise at Yorba LindaYorba LindaCA1,689 25,240 2,601 1,780 27,750 29,530 11,460 18,070 2002200735 years
Sunrise at Cherry CreekDenverCO1,621 28,370 3,697 1,721 31,967 33,688 12,825 20,863 2000200735 years
Sunrise at PinehurstDenverCO1,417 30,885 2,301 1,716 32,887 34,603 13,870 20,733 1998200735 years
Sunrise at OrchardLittletonCO1,813 22,183 3,666 1,853 25,809 27,662 10,325 17,337 1997200735 years
Sunrise of WestminsterWestminsterCO2,649 16,243 2,548 2,860 18,580 21,440 7,928 13,512 2000200735 years
Sunrise of StamfordStamfordCT4,612 28,533 3,433 5,029 31,549 36,578 13,242 23,336 1999200735 years
Sunrise of JacksonvilleJacksonvilleFL2,390 17,671 652 2,420 18,293 20,713 4,912 15,801 2009201235 years
Sunrise at Ivey RidgeAlpharettaGA1,507 18,516 1,622 1,517 20,128 21,645 8,561 13,084 1998200735 years
Sunrise of Huntcliff Summit IAtlantaGA4,232 66,161 19,970 4,201 86,162 90,363 40,106 50,257 1987200735 years
Sunrise at Huntcliff Summit IIAtlantaGA2,154 17,137 3,370 2,160 20,501 22,661 8,588 14,073 1998200735 years
Sunrise at East CobbMariettaGA1,797 23,420 1,524 1,806 24,935 26,741 10,547 16,194 1997200735 years
Sunrise of BarringtonBarringtonIL859 15,085 844 892 15,896 16,788 4,636 12,152 2007201235 years
Sunrise of BloomingdaleBloomingdaleIL1,287 38,625 2,280 1,382 40,810 42,192 16,874 25,318 2000200735 years
Sunrise of Buffalo GroveBuffalo GroveIL2,154 28,021 1,893 2,339 29,729 32,068 12,351 19,717 1999200735 years
Sunrise of Lincoln ParkChicagoIL3,485 26,687 4,622 3,510 31,284 34,794 12,107 22,687 2003200735 years
Sunrise of NapervilleNapervilleIL1,946 28,538 2,659 2,624 30,519 33,143 13,133 20,010 1999200735 years
Sunrise of Palos ParkPalos ParkIL2,363 42,205 1,371 2,416 43,523 45,939 17,862 28,077 2001200735 years
Sunrise of Park RidgePark RidgeIL5,533 39,557 3,270 5,707 42,653 48,360 17,703 30,657 1998200735 years
Sunrise of WillowbrookWillowbrookIL1,454 60,738 (14,182)2,080 45,930 48,010 24,031 23,979 2000200735 years
Sunrise on Old MeridianCarmelIN8,550 31,746 1,499 8,581 33,214 41,795 9,491 32,304 2009201235 years
Sunrise of LeawoodLeawoodKS651 16,401 1,421 878 17,595 18,473 4,962 13,511 2006201235 years
Sunrise of Overland ParkOverland ParkKS650 11,015 1,054 807 11,912 12,719 3,593 9,126 2007201235 years
Sunrise of Baton RougeBaton RougeLA1,212 23,547 2,197 1,471 25,485 26,956 10,537 16,419 2000200735 years
Sunrise of ColumbiaColumbiaMD1,780 23,083 4,415 1,918 27,360 29,278 11,412 17,866 1996200735 years
Sunrise of RockvilleRockvilleMD1,039 39,216 2,945 1,075 42,125 43,200 17,150 26,050 1997200735 years
Sunrise of ArlingtonArlingtonMA86 34,393 1,682 107 36,054 36,161 14,760 21,401 2001200735 years
Sunrise of NorwoodNorwoodMA2,230 30,968 2,383 2,356 33,225 35,581 13,628 21,953 1997200735 years
Sunrise of BloomfieldBloomfield HillsMI3,736 27,657 2,414 3,927 29,880 33,807 12,145 21,662 2006200735 years
Sunrise of CascadeGrand RapidsMI1,273 21,782 1,013 1,370 22,698 24,068 6,378 17,690 2007201235 years
Sunrise of NorthvillePlymouthMI1,445 26,090 1,849 1,525 27,859 29,384 11,512 17,872 1999200735 years
Sunrise of RochesterRochesterMI2,774 38,666 1,951 2,854 40,537 43,391 16,650 26,741 1998200735 years
Sunrise of TroyTroyMI1,758 23,727 2,710 1,860 26,335 28,195 10,368 17,827 2001200735 years
Sunrise of EdinaEdinaMN3,181 24,224 1,362 3,305 25,462 28,767 11,412 17,355 1999200735 years
Sunrise of East BrunswickEast BrunswickNJ2,784 26,173 2,582 3,040 28,499 31,539 12,190 19,349 1999200735 years
128


 Location Initial Cost to Company Gross Amount Carried at Close of Period      
Property NameCity
State /
Province
Encumbrances
Land and
Improvements
Buildings and
Improvements
Costs
Capitalized
Subsequent
to Acquisition
Land and
Improvements
Buildings and
Improvements
Total
Accumulated
Depreciation
NBV
Year of
Construction
Year
Acquired
Life on
Which
Depreciation
in Income
Statement
is Computed
Sunrise of ChandlerChandlerAZ
4,344
14,455
807
4,439
15,167
19,606
3,095
16,511
2007201235 years
Sunrise of ScottsdaleScottsdaleAZ
2,229
27,575
750
2,255
28,299
30,554
9,100
21,454
2007200735 years
Sunrise at River RoadTucsonAZ
2,971
12,399
435
3,000
12,805
15,805
2,421
13,384
2008201235 years
Sunrise of Lynn ValleyVancouverBC
11,759
37,424
(8,888)9,293
31,002
40,295
9,781
30,514
2002200735 years
Sunrise of VancouverVancouverBC
6,649
31,937
996
6,662
32,920
39,582
10,728
28,854
2005200735 years
Sunrise of VictoriaVictoriaBC
8,332
29,970
(6,486)6,664
25,152
31,816
8,030
23,786
2001200735 years
Sunrise at La CostaCarlsbadCA
4,890
20,590
1,549
5,030
21,999
27,029
7,600
19,429
1999200735 years
Sunrise of CarmichaelCarmichaelCA
1,269
14,598
519
1,284
15,102
16,386
2,963
13,423
2009201235 years
Sunrise of Fair OaksFair OaksCA
1,456
23,679
2,283
2,506
24,912
27,418
8,255
19,163
2001200735 years
Sunrise of Mission ViejoMission ViejoCA
3,802
24,560
1,515
3,867
26,010
29,877
8,694
21,183
1998200735 years
Sunrise at Canyon CrestRiversideCA
5,486
19,658
1,935
5,577
21,502
27,079
7,140
19,939
2006200735 years
Sunrise of RocklinRocklinCA
1,378
23,565
967
1,411
24,499
25,910
7,971
17,939
2007200735 years
Sunrise of San MateoSan MateoCA
2,682
35,335
1,718
2,705
37,030
39,735
11,782
27,953
1999200735 years
Sunrise of SunnyvaleSunnyvaleCA
2,933
34,361
1,186
2,969
35,511
38,480
11,427
27,053
2000200735 years
Sunrise at Sterling CanyonValenciaCA
3,868
29,293
4,732
4,078
33,815
37,893
11,716
26,177
1998200735 years
Sunrise of Westlake VillageWestlake VillageCA
4,935
30,722
1,133
5,031
31,759
36,790
10,254
26,536
2004200735 years
Sunrise at Yorba LindaYorba LindaCA
1,689
25,240
1,631
1,765
26,795
28,560
8,605
19,955
2002200735 years
Sunrise at Cherry CreekDenverCO
1,621
28,370
1,475
1,721
29,745
31,466
9,675
21,791
2000200735 years
Sunrise at PinehurstDenverCO
1,417
30,885
2,090
1,653
32,739
34,392
11,123
23,269
1998200735 years
Sunrise at OrchardLittletonCO
1,813
22,183
1,753
1,853
23,896
25,749
7,996
17,753
1997200735 years
Sunrise of WestminsterWestminsterCO
2,649
16,243
1,696
2,792
17,796
20,588
5,986
14,602
2000200735 years
Sunrise of StamfordStamfordCT
4,612
28,533
2,128
5,029
30,244
35,273
10,237
25,036
1999200735 years
Sunrise of JacksonvilleJacksonvilleFL
2,390
17,671
335
2,420
17,976
20,396
3,541
16,855
2009201235 years
Sunrise at Ivey RidgeAlpharettaGA
1,507
18,516
1,500
1,517
20,006
21,523
6,642
14,881
1998200735 years
Sunrise of Huntcliff Summit IAtlantaGA
4,232
66,161
17,045
4,185
83,253
87,438
28,310
59,128
1987200735 years
Sunrise at Huntcliff Summit IIAtlantaGA
2,154
17,137
2,291
2,160
19,422
21,582
6,668
14,914
1998200735 years
Sunrise at East CobbMariettaGA
1,797
23,420
1,723
1,806
25,134
26,940
8,371
18,569
1997200735 years
Sunrise of BarringtonBarringtonIL
859
15,085
595
892
15,647
16,539
3,114
13,425
2007201235 years
Sunrise of BloomingdaleBloomingdaleIL
1,287
38,625
2,056
1,382
40,586
41,968
12,980
28,988
2000200735 years
Sunrise of Buffalo GroveBuffalo GroveIL
2,154
28,021
1,547
2,339
29,383
31,722
9,652
22,070
1999200735 years
Sunrise of Lincoln ParkChicagoIL
3,485
26,687
2,205
3,504
28,873
32,377
8,753
23,624
2003200735 years
Sunrise of NapervilleNapervilleIL
1,946
28,538
2,639
2,622
30,501
33,123
10,347
22,776
1999200735 years
Sunrise of Palos ParkPalos ParkIL
2,363
42,205
1,278
2,394
43,452
45,846
14,012
31,834
2001200735 years
Sunrise of Park RidgePark RidgeIL
5,533
39,557
2,828
5,677
42,241
47,918
13,668
34,250
1998200735 years
Sunrise of WillowbrookWillowbrookIL
1,454
60,738
2,651
2,080
62,763
64,843
18,572
46,271
2000200735 years
Sunrise on Old MeridianCarmelIN
8,550
31,746
806
8,550
32,552
41,102
6,307
34,795
2009201235 years
Sunrise of LeawoodLeawoodKS
651
16,401
906
768
17,190
17,958
3,146
14,812
2006201235 years
Sunrise of Overland ParkOverland ParkKS
650
11,015
482
660
11,487
12,147
2,368
9,779
2007201235 years

 Location Initial Cost to CompanyGross Amount Carried at Close of Period   
Property NameCityState /
Province
EncumbrancesLand and
Improvements
Buildings and
Improvements
Costs
Capitalized
Subsequent
to Acquisition1
Land and
Improvements
Buildings and
Improvements
TotalAccumulated
Depreciation
NBVYear of
Construction
Year
Acquired
Life on
Which
Depreciation
in Income
Statement
is Computed
Sunrise of JacksonJacksonNJ4,009 15,029 1,015 4,037 16,016 20,053 4,817 15,236 2008201235 years
Sunrise of Morris PlainsMorris PlainsNJ1,492 32,052 3,063 1,601 35,006 36,607 14,384 22,223 1997200735 years
Sunrise of Old TappanOld TappanNJ2,985 36,795 3,247 3,177 39,850 43,027 16,082 26,945 1997200735 years
Sunrise of WallWall TownshipNJ1,053 19,101 2,261 1,088 21,327 22,415 8,954 13,461 1999200735 years
Sunrise of WayneWayneNJ1,288 24,990 3,544 1,373 28,449 29,822 11,786 18,036 1996200735 years
Sunrise of WestfieldWestfieldNJ5,057 23,803 3,172 5,185 26,847 32,032 11,164 20,868 1996200735 years
Sunrise of Woodcliff LakeWoodcliff LakeNJ3,493 30,801 3,110 3,692 33,712 37,404 13,755 23,649 2000200735 years
Sunrise of North LynbrookLynbrookNY4,622 38,087 3,461 4,700 41,470 46,170 17,189 28,981 1999200735 years
Sunrise at FleetwoodMount VernonNY4,381 28,434 2,948 4,723 31,040 35,763 13,401 22,362 1999200735 years
Sunrise of New CityNew CityNY1,906 27,323 2,871 1,998 30,102 32,100 12,413 19,687 1999200735 years
Sunrise of SmithtownSmithtownNY2,853 25,621 3,925 3,040 29,359 32,399 12,669 19,730 1999200735 years
Sunrise of Staten IslandStaten IslandNY7,237 23,910 2,044 7,292 25,899 33,191 13,668 19,523 2006200735 years
Sunrise on ProvidenceCharlotteNC1,976 19,472 3,031 2,004 22,475 24,479 9,471 15,008 1999200735 years
Sunrise at North HillsRaleighNC749 37,091 5,690 849 42,681 43,530 18,375 25,155 2000200735 years
Sunrise at ParmaClevelandOH695 16,641 1,613 908 18,041 18,949 7,663 11,286 2000200735 years
Sunrise of Cuyahoga FallsCuyahoga FallsOH626 10,239 2,244 862 12,247 13,109 5,331 7,778 2000200735 years
Sunrise of AbingtonAbingtonPA1,838 53,660 6,462 2,107 59,853 61,960 24,719 37,241 1997200735 years
Sunrise of Blue BellBlue BellPA1,765 23,920 3,623 1,928 27,380 29,308 11,716 17,592 2006200735 years
Sunrise of ExtonExtonPA1,123 17,765 2,518 1,222 20,184 21,406 8,570 12,836 2000200735 years
Sunrise of HaverfordHaverfordPA941 25,872 2,660 990 28,483 29,473 11,972 17,501 1997200735 years
Sunrise of Granite RunMediaPA1,272 31,781 2,770 1,441 34,382 35,823 14,240 21,583 1997200735 years
Sunrise of Lower MakefieldMorrisvillePA3,165 21,337 923 3,174 22,251 25,425 6,507 18,918 2008201235 years
Sunrise of WesttownWest ChesterPA1,547 22,996 2,166 1,625 25,084 26,709 10,882 15,827 1999200735 years
Sunrise of HillcrestDallasTX2,616 27,680 1,468 2,626 29,138 31,764 11,942 19,822 2006200735 years
Sunrise of Fort WorthFort WorthTX2,024 18,587 1,462 2,178 19,895 22,073 5,826 16,247 2007201235 years
Sunrise of FriscoFriscoTX2,523 14,547 987 2,561 15,496 18,057 4,262 13,795 2009201235 years
Sunrise of Cinco RanchKatyTX2,512 21,600 1,702 2,600 23,214 25,814 6,712 19,102 2007201235 years
Sunrise at HolladayHolladayUT2,542 44,771 1,516 2,596 46,233 48,829 12,936 35,893 2008201235 years
Sunrise of SandySandyUT2,576 22,987 522 2,646 23,439 26,085 9,660 16,425 2007200735 years
Sunrise of AlexandriaAlexandriaVA88 14,811 3,466 244 18,121 18,365 7,660 10,705 1998200735 years
Sunrise of RichmondRichmondVA1,120 17,446 1,325 1,224 18,667 19,891 8,079 11,812 1999200735 years
Sunrise at Bon AirRichmondVA2,047 22,079 1,270 2,032 23,364 25,396 6,779 18,617 2008201235 years
Sunrise of SpringfieldSpringfieldVA4,440 18,834 2,888 4,545 21,617 26,162 9,332 16,830 1997200735 years
Sunrise of Lynn ValleyVancouverBC11,759 37,424 (8,153)9,366 31,664 41,030 12,957 28,073 2002200735 years
Sunrise of VancouverVancouverBC6,649 31,937 1,776 6,662 33,700 40,362 13,759 26,603 2005200735 years
Sunrise of VictoriaVictoriaBC8,332 29,970 (5,550)6,725 26,027 32,752 10,806 21,946 2001200735 years
Sunrise of AuroraAuroraON1,570 36,113 (6,537)1,347 29,799 31,146 12,149 18,997 2002200735 years
Sunrise of BurlingtonBurlingtonON1,173 24,448 1,535 1,382 25,774 27,156 10,712 16,444 2001200735 years
129
 Location Initial Cost to Company Gross Amount Carried at Close of Period      
Property NameCity
State /
Province
Encumbrances
Land and
Improvements
Buildings and
Improvements
Costs
Capitalized
Subsequent
to Acquisition
Land and
Improvements
Buildings and
Improvements
Total
Accumulated
Depreciation
NBV
Year of
Construction
Year
Acquired
Life on
Which
Depreciation
in Income
Statement
is Computed
Sunrise of Baton RougeBaton RougeLA
1,212
23,547
1,606
1,382
24,983
26,365
8,192
18,173
2000200735 years
Sunrise of ArlingtonArlingtonMA
86
34,393
1,059
107
35,431
35,538
11,655
23,883
2001200735 years
Sunrise of NorwoodNorwoodMA
2,230
30,968
2,053
2,306
32,945
35,251
10,707
24,544
1997200735 years
Sunrise of ColumbiaColumbiaMD
1,780
23,083
2,923
1,918
25,868
27,786
8,298
19,488
1996200735 years
Sunrise of RockvilleRockvilleMD
1,039
39,216
2,660
1,066
41,849
42,915
12,915
30,000
1997200735 years
Sunrise of BloomfieldBloomfield HillsMI
3,736
27,657
1,981
3,860
29,514
33,374
9,478
23,896
2006200735 years
Sunrise of CascadeGrand RapidsMI
1,273
21,782
609
1,364
22,300
23,664
4,256
19,408
2007201235 years
Sunrise of NorthvillePlymouthMI
1,445
26,090
1,365
1,525
27,375
28,900
9,061
19,839
1999200735 years
Sunrise of RochesterRochesterMI
2,774
38,666
1,284
2,846
39,878
42,724
12,877
29,847
1998200735 years
Sunrise of TroyTroyMI
1,758
23,727
928
1,860
24,553
26,413
8,168
18,245
2001200735 years
Sunrise of EdinaEdinaMN
3,181
24,224
2,915
3,270
27,050
30,320
9,050
21,270
1999200735 years
Sunrise on ProvidenceCharlotteNC
1,976
19,472
2,340
1,988
21,800
23,788
7,128
16,660
1999200735 years
Sunrise of East BrunswickEast BrunswickNJ
2,784
26,173
2,252
3,030
28,179
31,209
9,680
21,529
1999200735 years
Sunrise of JacksonJacksonNJ
4,009
15,029
587
4,013
15,612
19,625
3,218
16,407
2008201235 years
Sunrise of Morris PlainsMorris PlainsNJ17,488
1,492
32,052
2,003
1,569
33,978
35,547
11,078
24,469
1997200735 years
Sunrise of Old TappanOld TappanNJ16,241
2,985
36,795
2,032
3,106
38,706
41,812
12,611
29,201
1997200735 years
Sunrise of WallWall TownshipNJ
1,053
19,101
2,022
1,088
21,088
22,176
6,657
15,519
1999200735 years
Sunrise of WayneWayneNJ12,901
1,288
24,990
2,475
1,304
27,449
28,753
8,907
19,846
1996200735 years
Sunrise of WestfieldWestfieldNJ17,095
5,057
23,803
2,119
5,136
25,843
30,979
8,666
22,313
1996200735 years
Sunrise of Woodcliff LakeWoodcliff LakeNJ
3,493
30,801
1,368
3,537
32,125
35,662
10,744
24,918
2000200735 years
Sunrise of North LynbrookLynbrookNY
4,622
38,087
1,985
4,700
39,994
44,694
13,556
31,138
1999200735 years
Sunrise at FleetwoodMount VernonNY
4,381
28,434
2,393
4,531
30,677
35,208
10,289
24,919
1999200735 years
Sunrise of New CityNew CityNY
1,906
27,323
1,764
1,950
29,043
30,993
9,584
21,409
1999200735 years
Sunrise of SmithtownSmithtownNY
2,853
25,621
2,467
3,040
27,901
30,941
9,703
21,238
1999200735 years
Sunrise of Staten IslandStaten IslandNY
7,237
23,910
438
7,288
24,297
31,585
10,408
21,177
2006200735 years
Sunrise at North HillsRaleighNC
749
37,091
5,417
849
42,408
43,257
13,895
29,362
2000200735 years
Sunrise at ParmaClevelandOH
695
16,641
1,214
890
17,660
18,550
5,944
12,606
2000200735 years
Sunrise of Cuyahoga FallsCuyahoga FallsOH
626
10,239
1,542
783
11,624
12,407
4,064
8,343
2000200735 years
Sunrise of AuroraAuroraON
1,570
36,113
(6,664)1,274
29,745
31,019
9,530
21,489
2002200735 years
Sunrise of BurlingtonBurlingtonON
1,173
24,448
832
1,192
25,261
26,453
7,976
18,477
2001200735 years
Sunrise of UnionvilleMarkhamON
2,322
41,140
(7,621)1,908
33,933
35,841
10,824
25,017
2000200735 years
Sunrise of MississaugaMississaugaON
3,554
33,631
(6,495)2,915
27,775
30,690
8,905
21,785
2000200735 years
Sunrise of Erin MillsMississaugaON
1,957
27,020
(5,045)1,593
22,339
23,932
7,338
16,594
2007200735 years
Sunrise of OakvilleOakvilleON
2,753
37,489
1,331
2,759
38,814
41,573
12,186
29,387
2002200735 years
Sunrise of Richmond HillRichmond HillON
2,155
41,254
(7,840)1,733
33,836
35,569
10,658
24,911
2002200735 years
Sunrise of ThornhillVaughanON
2,563
57,513
(8,758)1,420
49,898
51,318
14,898
36,420
2003200735 years
Sunrise of WindsorWindsorON
1,813
20,882
838
1,834
21,699
23,533
6,944
16,589
2001200735 years
Sunrise of AbingtonAbingtonPA22
1,838
53,660
5,116
2,015
58,599
60,614
18,706
41,908
1997200735 years



 Location Initial Cost to CompanyGross Amount Carried at Close of Period   
Property NameCityState /
Province
EncumbrancesLand and
Improvements
Buildings and
Improvements
Costs
Capitalized
Subsequent
to Acquisition1
Land and
Improvements
Buildings and
Improvements
TotalAccumulated
Depreciation
NBVYear of
Construction
Year
Acquired
Life on
Which
Depreciation
in Income
Statement
is Computed
Sunrise of UnionvilleMarkhamON2,322 41,140 (7,103)2,022 34,337 36,359 14,171 22,188 2000200735 years
Sunrise of MississaugaMississaugaON3,554 33,631 (5,987)3,031 28,167 31,198 11,767 19,431 2000200735 years
Sunrise of Erin MillsMississaugaON1,957 27,020 (4,821)1,573 22,583 24,156 9,287 14,869 2007200735 years
Sunrise of OakvilleOakvilleON2,753 37,489 2,355 2,955 39,642 42,597 16,229 26,368 2002200735 years
Sunrise of Richmond HillRichmond HillON2,155 41,254 (7,381)1,872 34,156 36,028 14,052 21,976 2002200735 years
Sunrise of ThornhillVaughanON2,563 57,513 (8,900)1,507 49,669 51,176 18,985 32,191 2003200735 years
Sunrise of WindsorWindsorON1,813 20,882 2,034 2,000 22,729 24,729 9,411 15,318 2001200735 years
TOTAL FOR SUNRISE SENIOR HOUSING COMMUNITIES0 245,515 2,532,176 147,460 250,690 2,674,461 2,925,151 1,079,059 1,846,092 
ATRIA SENIOR HOUSING COMMUNITIES
Atria RegencyMobileAL950 11,897 1,945 1,025 13,767 14,792 5,356 9,436 1996201135 years
Atria Chandler VillasChandlerAZ3,650 8,450 2,668 3,785 10,983 14,768 5,063 9,705 1988201135 years
Atria Park of Sierra PointeScottsdaleAZ10,930 65,372 5,786 11,021 71,067 82,088 16,386 65,702 2000201435 years
Atria Campana del RioTucsonAZ5,861 37,284 3,478 5,992 40,631 46,623 14,693 31,930 1964201135 years
Atria Valley ManorTucsonAZ1,709 60 1,115 1,815 1,069 2,884 759 2,125 1963201135 years
Atria Bell Court GardensTucsonAZ3,010 30,969 2,737 3,063 33,653 36,716 11,201 25,515 1964201135 years
Atria BurlingameBurlingameCA2,494 12,373 2,019 2,601 14,285 16,886 5,317 11,569 1977201135 years
Atria Las PosasCamarilloCA4,500 28,436 1,599 4,541 29,994 34,535 9,849 24,686 1997201135 years
Atria Carmichael OaksCarmichaelCA2,118 49,694 4,255 2,356 53,711 56,067 14,727 41,340 1992201335 years
Atria El Camino GardensCarmichaelCA6,930 32,318 16,026 7,215 48,059 55,274 19,289 35,985 1984201135 years
Villa BonitaChula VistaCA2,700 7,994 1,449 1,658 10,485 12,143 3,023 9,120 1989201135 years
Atria CovinaCovinaCA170 4,131 1,029 262 5,068 5,330 2,205 3,125 1977201135 years
Atria Daly CityDaly CityCA3,090 13,448 1,369 3,116 14,791 17,907 5,313 12,594 1975201135 years
Atria Covell GardensDavisCA2,163 39,657 13,087 2,388 52,519 54,907 20,532 34,375 1987201135 years
Atria EncinitasEncinitasCA5,880 9,212 3,046 5,952 12,186 18,138 4,620 13,518 1984201135 years
Atria North EscondidoEscondidoCA1,196 7,155 852 1,215 7,988 9,203 2,247 6,956 2002201435 years
Atria Grass ValleyGrass ValleyCA1,965 28,414 1,896 2,059 30,216 32,275 8,394 23,881 2000201335 years
Atria Golden CreekIrvineCA6,900 23,544 3,307 6,946 26,805 33,751 9,249 24,502 1985201135 years
Atria Park of LafayetteLafayetteCA5,679 56,922 2,442 6,463 58,580 65,043 15,427 49,616 2007201335 years
Atria Del SolMission ViejoCA3,500 12,458 8,907 3,830 21,035 24,865 10,019 14,846 1985201135 years
Atria Newport PlazaNewport BeachCA4,534 32,912 1,601 4,569 34,478 39,047 3,658 35,389 1989201735 years
Atria Tamalpais CreekNovatoCA5,812 24,703 1,350 5,838 26,027 31,865 8,682 23,183 1978201135 years
Atria Park of Pacific PalisadesPacific PalisadesCA4,458 17,064 1,542 4,489 18,575 23,064 8,177 14,887 2001200735 years
Atria Palm DesertPalm DesertCA2,887 9,843 1,760 3,145 11,345 14,490 6,211 8,279 1988201135 years
Atria HaciendaPalm DesertCA6,680 85,900 4,324 6,876 90,028 96,904 28,182 68,722 1989201135 years
Atria Del ReyRancho CucamongaCA3,290 17,427 5,978 3,477 23,218 26,695 10,257 16,438 1987201135 years
Mission HillsRancho MirageCA1,610 9,169 798 6,800 4,777 11,577 1,717 9,860 1996201435 years
Atria RocklinRocklinCA17,864 4,427 52,064 1,839 4,507 53,823 58,330 11,217 47,113 2001201535 years
130


 Location Initial Cost to Company Gross Amount Carried at Close of Period      
Property NameCity
State /
Province
Encumbrances
Land and
Improvements
Buildings and
Improvements
Costs
Capitalized
Subsequent
to Acquisition
Land and
Improvements
Buildings and
Improvements
Total
Accumulated
Depreciation
NBV
Year of
Construction
Year
Acquired
Life on
Which
Depreciation
in Income
Statement
is Computed
Sunrise of Blue BellBlue BellPA
1,765
23,920
3,101
1,827
26,959
28,786
8,931
19,855
2006200735 years
Sunrise of ExtonExtonPA
1,123
17,765
1,705
1,191
19,402
20,593
6,604
13,989
2000200735 years
Sunrise of HaverfordHaverfordPA6,893
941
25,872
2,217
983
28,047
29,030
9,017
20,013
1997200735 years
Sunrise of Granite RunMediaPA10,609
1,272
31,781
2,344
1,369
34,028
35,397
11,046
24,351
1997200735 years
Sunrise of Lower MakefieldMorrisvillePA
3,165
21,337
587
3,167
21,922
25,089
4,324
20,765
2008201235 years
Sunrise of WesttownWest ChesterPA
1,547
22,996
2,144
1,570
25,117
26,687
8,576
18,111
1999200735 years
Sunrise of HillcrestDallasTX
2,616
27,680
822
2,626
28,492
31,118
9,253
21,865
2006200735 years
Sunrise of Fort WorthFort WorthTX
2,024
18,587
813
2,116
19,308
21,424
3,857
17,567
2007201235 years
Sunrise of FriscoFriscoTX
2,523
14,547
465
2,535
15,000
17,535
2,649
14,886
2009201235 years
Sunrise of Cinco RanchKatyTX
2,512
21,600
1,108
2,580
22,640
25,220
4,382
20,838
2007201235 years
Sunrise at HolladayHolladayUT
2,542
44,771
843
2,581
45,575
48,156
8,639
39,517
2008201235 years
Sunrise of SandySandyUT
2,576
22,987
321
2,618
23,266
25,884
7,755
18,129
2007200735 years
Sunrise of AlexandriaAlexandriaVA
88
14,811
2,260
240
16,919
17,159
6,079
11,080
1998200735 years
Sunrise of RichmondRichmondVA
1,120
17,446
1,205
1,164
18,607
19,771
6,495
13,276
1999200735 years
Sunrise at Bon AirRichmondVA
2,047
22,079
664
2,032
22,758
24,790
4,504
20,286
2008201235 years
Sunrise of SpringfieldSpringfieldVA7,893
4,440
18,834
2,635
4,536
21,373
25,909
7,193
18,716
1997200735 years
TOTAL FOR SUNRISE SENIORS HOUSING COMMUNITIES  111,090
245,515
2,532,176
99,539
246,623
2,630,607
2,877,230
819,088
2,058,142
   
ATRIA SENIORS HOUSING COMMUNITIES              
Arbour LakeCalgaryAB
2,512
39,188
(2,157)2,332
37,211
39,543
4,396
35,147
2003201435 years
Canyon MeadowsCalgaryAB
1,617
30,803
(1,557)1,494
29,369
30,863
3,652
27,211
1995201435 years
Churchill ManorEdmontonAB
2,865
30,482
(1,777)2,647
28,923
31,570
3,622
27,948
1999201435 years
The View at LethbridgeLethbridgeAB
2,503
24,770
(1,545)2,313
23,415
25,728
3,153
22,575
2007201435 years
Victoria ParkRed DeerAB
1,188
22,554
(869)1,098
21,775
22,873
2,966
19,907
1999201435 years
Ironwood EstatesSt. AlbertAB
3,639
22,519
(1,112)3,377
21,669
25,046
2,925
22,121
1998201435 years
Atria RegencyMobileAL
950
11,897
1,387
981
13,253
14,234
3,690
10,544
1996201135 years
Atria Chandler VillasChandlerAZ
3,650
8,450
1,580
3,721
9,959
13,680
3,554
10,126
1988201135 years
Atria Park of Sierra PointeScottsdaleAZ
10,930
65,372
3,269
10,969
68,602
79,571
8,182
71,389
2000201435 years
Atria Campana del RioTucsonAZ
5,861
37,284
2,254
5,972
39,427
45,399
10,250
35,149
1964201135 years
Atria Valley ManorTucsonAZ
1,709
60
819
1,768
820
2,588
417
2,171
1963201135 years
Atria Bell Court GardensTucsonAZ
3,010
30,969
1,969
3,060
32,888
35,948
7,677
28,271
1964201135 years
Longlake ChateauNanaimoBC
1,874
22,910
(1,018)1,738
22,028
23,766
3,011
20,755
1990201435 years
Prince George ChateauPrince GeorgeBC
2,066
22,761
(1,449)1,909
21,469
23,378
2,909
20,469
2005201435 years
The VictorianVictoriaBC
3,419
16,351
(620)3,184
15,966
19,150
2,266
16,884
1988201435 years
The Victorian at McKenzieVictoriaBC
4,801
25,712
(1,529)4,440
24,544
28,984
3,231
25,753
2003201435 years
Atria BurlingameBurlingameCA
2,494
12,373
1,522
2,523
13,866
16,389
3,606
12,783
1977201135 years
Atria Las PosasCamarilloCA
4,500
28,436
1,206
4,518
29,624
34,142
6,855
27,287
1997201135 years
Atria Carmichael OaksCarmichaelCA18,015
2,118
49,694
2,192
2,147
51,857
54,004
8,944
45,060
1992201335 years
Atria El Camino GardensCarmichaelCA
6,930
32,318
14,347
7,210
46,385
53,595
10,402
43,193
1984201135 years

 Location Initial Cost to CompanyGross Amount Carried at Close of Period   
Property NameCityState /
Province
EncumbrancesLand and
Improvements
Buildings and
Improvements
Costs
Capitalized
Subsequent
to Acquisition1
Land and
Improvements
Buildings and
Improvements
TotalAccumulated
Depreciation
NBVYear of
Construction
Year
Acquired
Life on
Which
Depreciation
in Income
Statement
is Computed
Atria La JollaSan DiegoCA8,210 46,315 (1,070)8,216 45,239 53,455 4,821 48,634 1984201735 years
Atria PenasquitosSan DiegoCA2,649 24,067 2,325 2,711 26,330 29,041 2,729 26,312 1991201735 years
Atria CollwoodSan DiegoCA290 10,650 1,566 348 12,158 12,506 4,660 7,846 1976201135 years
Atria Rancho ParkSan DimasCA4,066 14,306 2,273 4,625 16,020 20,645 6,545 14,100 1975201135 years
Regency of Evergreen ValleySan JoseCA6,800 3,637 1,299 2,707 9,029 11,736 3,217 8,519 1998201135 years
Atria Willow GlenSan JoseCA8,521 43,168 3,896 8,627 46,958 55,585 14,216 41,369 1976201135 years
Atria San JuanSan Juan CapistranoCA5,110 29,436 9,287 5,353 38,480 43,833 17,013 26,820 1985201135 years
Atria HillsdaleSan MateoCA5,240 15,956 29,714 7,042 43,868 50,910 7,720 43,190 1986201135 years
Atria Santa ClaritaSanta ClaritaCA3,880 38,366 1,853 3,890 40,209 44,099 8,612 35,487 2001201535 years
Atria SunnyvaleSunnyvaleCA6,120 30,068 5,456 6,247 35,397 41,644 12,938 28,706 1977201135 years
Atria Park of TarzanaTarzanaCA960 47,547 6,714 5,861 49,360 55,221 12,761 42,460 2008201335 years
Atria Park of Vintage HillsTemeculaCA4,674 44,341 3,582 4,892 47,705 52,597 13,486 39,111 2000201335 years
Atria Park of Grand OaksThousand OaksCA5,994 50,309 1,691 6,069 51,925 57,994 14,147 43,847 2002201335 years
Atria HillcrestThousand OaksCA6,020 25,635 10,655 6,624 35,686 42,310 16,628 25,682 1987201135 years
Atria Walnut CreekWalnut CreekCA6,910 15,797 17,635 7,642 32,700 40,342 17,960 22,382 1978201135 years
Atria Valley ViewWalnut CreekCA7,139 53,914 3,287 7,193 57,147 64,340 25,830 38,510 1977201135 years
Atria LongmontLongmontCO2,807 24,877 1,528 2,874 26,338 29,212 7,837 21,375 2009201235 years
Atria DarienDarienCT653 37,587 12,387 1,202 49,425 50,627 18,589 32,038 1997201135 years
Atria Larson PlaceHamdenCT1,850 16,098 2,741 1,889 18,800 20,689 6,806 13,883 1999201135 years
Atria Greenridge PlaceRocky HillCT2,170 32,553 2,898 2,392 35,229 37,621 11,351 26,270 1998201135 years
Atria StamfordStamfordCT1,200 62,432 20,362 1,487 82,507 83,994 26,793 57,201 1975201135 years
Atria Crossroads PlaceWaterfordCT2,401 36,495 8,089 2,577 44,408 46,985 16,966 30,019 2000201135 years
Atria Hamilton HeightsWest HartfordCT3,120 14,674 4,118 3,163 18,749 21,912 8,054 13,858 1904201135 years
Atria Windsor WoodsHudsonFL1,610 32,432 3,959 1,744 36,257 38,001 12,508 25,493 1988201135 years
Atria Park of Baypoint VillageHudsonFL2,083 28,841 10,180 2,369 38,735 41,104 15,605 25,499 1986201135 years
Atria Park of San PabloJacksonvilleFL1,620 14,920 1,365 1,660 16,245 17,905 5,499 12,406 1999201135 years
Atria Park of St. Joseph'sJupiterFL5,520 30,720 2,309 5,579 32,970 38,549 9,286 29,263 2007201335 years
Atria Lady LakeLady LakeFL3,752 26,265 (14,417)3,769 11,831 15,600 5,622 9,978 2010201535 years
Atria Park of Lake ForestSanfordFL3,589 32,586 5,481 4,104 37,552 41,656 12,604 29,052 2002201135 years
Atria Evergreen WoodsSpring HillFL2,370 28,371 6,382 2,574 34,549 37,123 13,071 24,052 1981201135 years
Atria North PointAlpharettaGA37,704 4,830 78,318 3,689 4,868 81,969 86,837 19,856 66,981 2007201435 years
Atria BuckheadAtlantaGA3,660 5,274 1,501 3,688 6,747 10,435 3,021 7,414 1996201135 years
Atria Park of TuckerTuckerGA1,103 20,679 870 1,120 21,532 22,652 6,008 16,644 2000201335 years
Atria Park of Glen EllynGlen EllynIL2,455 34,064 270 2,748 34,041 36,789 15,538 21,251 2000200735 years
Atria NewburghNewburghIN1,150 22,880 1,700 1,155 24,575 25,730 7,703 18,027 1998201135 years
Atria Hearthstone EastTopekaKS1,150 20,544 1,118 1,241 21,571 22,812 7,570 15,242 1998201135 years
Atria Hearthstone WestTopekaKS1,230 28,379 2,668 1,267 31,010 32,277 11,155 21,122 1987201135 years
Atria Highland CrossingCovingtonKY1,677 14,393 1,859 1,693 16,236 17,929 6,272 11,657 1988201135 years
131


 Location Initial Cost to Company Gross Amount Carried at Close of Period      
Property NameCity
State /
Province
Encumbrances
Land and
Improvements
Buildings and
Improvements
Costs
Capitalized
Subsequent
to Acquisition
Land and
Improvements
Buildings and
Improvements
Total
Accumulated
Depreciation
NBV
Year of
Construction
Year
Acquired
Life on
Which
Depreciation
in Income
Statement
is Computed
Atria CovinaCovinaCA
170
4,131
693
250
4,744
4,994
1,509
3,485
1977201135 years
Atria Daly CityDaly CityCA
3,090
13,448
1,113
3,102
14,549
17,651
3,660
13,991
1975201135 years
Atria Covell GardensDavisCA
2,163
39,657
11,064
2,382
50,502
52,884
13,083
39,801
1987201135 years
Atria EncinitasEncinitasCA
5,880
9,212
1,785
5,942
10,935
16,877
2,917
13,960
1984201135 years
Atria North EscondidoEscondidoCA
1,196
7,155
469
1,207
7,613
8,820
1,261
7,559
2002201435 years
Atria Grass ValleyGrass ValleyCA11,218
1,965
28,414
825
2,016
29,188
31,204
5,232
25,972
2000201335 years
Atria Golden CreekIrvineCA
6,900
23,544
1,385
6,930
24,899
31,829
6,383
25,446
1985201135 years
Atria Park of LafayetteLafayetteCA18,916
5,679
56,922
1,137
5,886
57,852
63,738
9,403
54,335
2007201335 years
Atria Del SolMission ViejoCA
3,500
12,458
8,590
3,781
20,767
24,548
5,623
18,925
1985201135 years
Atria Newport PlazaNewport BeachCA
4,534
32,881

4,534
32,881
37,415

37,415
1989201735 years
Atria Tamalpais CreekNovatoCA
5,812
24,703
876
5,831
25,560
31,391
6,040
25,351
1978201135 years
Atria Park of Pacific PalisadesPacific PalisadesCA
4,458
17,064
1,705
4,489
18,738
23,227
6,607
16,620
2001200735 years
Atria Palm DesertPalm DesertCA
2,887
9,843
1,239
3,115
10,854
13,969
4,663
9,306
1988201135 years
Atria HaciendaPalm DesertCA
6,680
85,900
3,291
6,873
88,998
95,871
19,449
76,422
1989201135 years
Atria ParadiseParadiseCA
2,265
28,262
1,090
2,309
29,308
31,617
5,184
26,433
1999201335 years
Atria Del ReyRancho CucamongaCA
3,290
17,427
5,470
3,464
22,723
26,187
7,237
18,950
1987201135 years
Atria RocklinRocklinCA19,221
4,427
52,064
872
4,439
52,924
57,363
5,339
52,024
2001201535 years
Atria La JollaSan DiegoCA
8,210
46,289

8,210
46,289
54,499

54,499
1984201735 years
Atria PenasquitosSan DiegoCA
2,649
23,993

2,649
23,993
26,642

26,642
1991201735 years
Atria CollwoodSan DiegoCA
290
10,650
1,174
338
11,776
12,114
3,218
8,896
1976201135 years
Atria Rancho ParkSan DimasCA
4,066
14,306
1,628
4,613
15,387
20,000
4,566
15,434
1975201135 years
Atria Chateau GardensSan JoseCA
39
487
644
49
1,121
1,170
1,159
11
1977201135 years
Atria Willow GlenSan JoseCA
8,521
43,168
2,931
8,590
46,030
54,620
9,642
44,978
1976201135 years
Atria San JuanSan Juan CapistranoCA
5,110
29,436
8,373
5,318
37,601
42,919
11,978
30,941
1985201135 years
Atria HillsdaleSan MateoCA
5,240
15,956
4,441
5,253
20,384
25,637
4,146
21,491
1986201135 years
Atria Santa ClaritaSanta ClaritaCA
3,880
38,366
932
3,890
39,288
43,178
4,024
39,154
2001201535 years
Atria Bayside LandingStocktonCA

467
660

1,127
1,127
963
164
1998201135 years
Atria SunnyvaleSunnyvaleCA
6,120
30,068
4,920
6,228
34,880
41,108
8,508
32,600
1977201135 years
Atria Park of TarzanaTarzanaCA
960
47,547
889
974
48,422
49,396
7,718
41,678
2008201335 years
Atria Park of Vintage HillsTemeculaCA
4,674
44,341
2,068
4,879
46,204
51,083
8,308
42,775
2000201335 years
Atria Park of Grand OaksThousand OaksCA21,965
5,994
50,309
916
6,055
51,164
57,219
8,886
48,333
2002201335 years
Atria HillcrestThousand OaksCA
6,020
25,635
10,103
6,624
35,134
41,758
11,103
30,655
1987201135 years
Atria Walnut CreekWalnut CreekCA
6,910
15,797
16,728
7,626
31,809
39,435
9,916
29,519
1978201135 years
Atria Valley ViewWalnut CreekCA
7,139
53,914
2,554
7,175
56,432
63,607
19,157
44,450
1977201135 years
Atria Park of ApplewoodLakewoodCO
3,656
48,657
419
3,686
49,046
52,732
8,747
43,985
2008201335 years
Atria Inn at LakewoodLakewoodCO
6,281
50,095
1,593
6,378
51,591
57,969
11,172
46,797
1999201135 years
Atria LongmontLongmontCO
2,807
24,877
994
2,834
25,844
28,678
5,139
23,539
2009201235 years
Atria DarienDarienCT
653
37,587
11,428
1,156
48,512
49,668
10,803
38,865
1997201135 years

 Location Initial Cost to CompanyGross Amount Carried at Close of Period   
Property NameCityState /
Province
EncumbrancesLand and
Improvements
Buildings and
Improvements
Costs
Capitalized
Subsequent
to Acquisition1
Land and
Improvements
Buildings and
Improvements
TotalAccumulated
Depreciation
NBVYear of
Construction
Year
Acquired
Life on
Which
Depreciation
in Income
Statement
is Computed
Atria Summit HillsCrestview HillsKY1,780 15,769 1,369 1,812 17,106 18,918 6,037 12,881 1998201135 years
Atria ElizabethtownElizabethtownKY850 12,510 1,038 884 13,514 14,398 4,589 9,809 1996201135 years
Atria St. MatthewsLouisvilleKY939 9,274 1,461 968 10,706 11,674 4,610 7,064 1998201135 years
Atria Stony BrookLouisvilleKY1,860 17,561 1,526 1,953 18,994 20,947 6,627 14,320 1999201135 years
Atria SpringdaleLouisvilleKY1,410 16,702 1,724 1,451 18,385 19,836 6,372 13,464 1999201135 years
Atria KennebunkKennebunkME1,090 23,496 1,745 1,159 25,172 26,331 8,496 17,835 1998201135 years
Atria ManresaAnnapolisMD4,193 19,000 2,511 4,465 21,239 25,704 7,368 18,336 1920201135 years
Atria SalisburySalisburyMD1,940 24,500 (3,220)1,979 21,241 23,220 7,991 15,229 1995201135 years
Atria Marland PlaceAndoverMA1,831 34,592 19,905 1,996 54,332 56,328 25,066 31,262 1996201135 years
Atria Longmeadow PlaceBurlingtonMA5,310 58,021 2,305 5,387 60,249 65,636 18,432 47,204 1998201135 years
Atria FairhavenFairhavenMA1,100 16,093 1,391 1,157 17,427 18,584 5,587 12,997 1999201135 years
Atria Woodbriar PlaceFalmouthMA4,630 27,314 5,936 6,433 31,447 37,880 9,746 28,134 2013201335 years
Atria Woodbriar ParkFalmouthMA1,970 43,693 21,590 2,711 64,542 67,253 24,349 42,904 1975201135 years
Atria Draper PlaceHopedaleMA1,140 17,794 1,953 1,234 19,653 20,887 6,681 14,206 1998201135 years
Atria Merrimack PlaceNewburyportMA2,774 40,645 24,722 4,319 63,822 68,141 12,969 55,172 2000201135 years
Atria Marina PlaceQuincyMA2,590 33,899 2,202 2,780 35,911 38,691 11,634 27,057 1999201135 years
Atria Park of Ann ArborAnn ArborMI1,703 15,857 2,124 1,837 17,847 19,684 8,105 11,579 2001200735 years
Atria KinghavenRiverviewMI1,440 26,260 3,840 1,614 29,926 31,540 10,094 21,446 1987201135 years
Atria SevilleLas VegasNV796 2,085 26 2,855 2,881 2,097 784 1999201135 years
Atria Summit RidgeRenoNV407 878 27 1,262 1,289 939 350 1997201135 years
Atria CranfordCranfordNJ8,260 61,411 5,980 8,420 67,231 75,651 22,636 53,015 1993201135 years
Atria Tinton FallsTinton FallsNJ6,580 13,258 1,966 6,762 15,042 21,804 6,133 15,671 1999201135 years
Atria ShakerAlbanyNY1,520 29,667 6,180 1,652 35,715 37,367 10,245 27,122 1997201135 years
Atria CrossgateAlbanyNY1,080 20,599 1,280 1,100 21,859 22,959 7,542 15,417 1980201135 years
Atria WoodlandsArdsleyNY43,744 7,660 65,581 3,559 7,718 69,082 76,800 22,346 54,454 2005201135 years
Atria Bay ShoreBay ShoreNY15,275 4,440 31,983 3,128 4,453 35,098 39,551 11,788 27,763 1900201135 years
Atria Briarcliff ManorBriarcliff ManorNY6,560 33,885 3,541 6,725 37,261 43,986 12,390 31,596 1997201135 years
Atria RiverdaleBronxNY1,020 24,149 16,674 1,084 40,759 41,843 18,224 23,619 1999201135 years
Atria Delmar PlaceDelmarNY1,201 24,850 1,249 1,223 26,077 27,300 6,450 20,850 2004201335 years
Atria East NorthportEast NorthportNY9,960 34,467 20,194 10,250 54,371 64,621 19,574 45,047 1996201135 years
Atria Glen CoveGlen CoveNY2,035 25,190 1,594 2,066 26,753 28,819 14,990 13,829 1997201135 years
Atria Great NeckGreat NeckNY3,390 54,051 28,881 3,482 82,840 86,322 25,162 61,160 1998201135 years
Atria Cutter MillGreat NeckNY2,750 47,919 3,865 2,761 51,773 54,534 16,113 38,421 1999201135 years
Atria HuntingtonHuntington StationNY8,190 1,169 2,943 8,232 4,070 12,302 3,231 9,071 1987201135 years
Atria Hertlin PlaceLake RonkonkomaNY7,886 16,391 2,622 7,889 19,010 26,899 6,071 20,828 2002201235 years
Atria LynbrookLynbrookNY3,145 5,489 15,273 3,176 20,731 23,907 3,144 20,763 1996201135 years
Atria TanglewoodLynbrookNY22,705 4,120 37,348 1,516 4,145 38,839 42,984 12,123 30,861 2005201135 years
Atria West 86New YorkNY80 73,685 7,786 167 81,384 81,551 27,323 54,228 1998201135 years
132


 Location Initial Cost to Company Gross Amount Carried at Close of Period      
Property NameCity
State /
Province
Encumbrances
Land and
Improvements
Buildings and
Improvements
Costs
Capitalized
Subsequent
to Acquisition
Land and
Improvements
Buildings and
Improvements
Total
Accumulated
Depreciation
NBV
Year of
Construction
Year
Acquired
Life on
Which
Depreciation
in Income
Statement
is Computed
Atria Larson PlaceHamdenCT
1,850
16,098
1,778
1,885
17,841
19,726
4,628
15,098
1999201135 years
Atria Greenridge PlaceRocky HillCT
2,170
32,553
2,352
2,388
34,687
37,075
7,751
29,324
1998201135 years
Atria StamfordStamfordCT
1,200
62,432
12,331
1,378
74,585
75,963
15,259
60,704
1975201135 years
Atria StratfordStratfordCT
3,210
27,865
1,828
3,210
29,693
32,903
7,264
25,639
1999201135 years
Atria Crossroads PlaceWaterfordCT
2,401
36,495
7,789
2,577
44,108
46,685
10,926
35,759
2000201135 years
Atria Hamilton HeightsWest HartfordCT
3,120
14,674
3,463
3,158
18,099
21,257
5,434
15,823
1904201135 years
Atria Windsor WoodsHudsonFL
1,610
32,432
2,048
1,687
34,403
36,090
8,650
27,440
1988201135 years
Atria Park of Baypoint VillageHudsonFL
2,083
28,841
8,612
2,350
37,186
39,536
9,753
29,783
1986201135 years
Atria Park of San PabloJacksonvilleFL5,388
1,620
14,920
921
1,660
15,801
17,461
3,764
13,697
1999201135 years
Atria Park of St. Joseph'sJupiterFL15,588
5,520
30,720
1,142
5,557
31,825
37,382
5,675
31,707
2007201335 years
Atria Lady LakeLady LakeFL
3,752
26,265
588
3,766
26,839
30,605
2,708
27,897
2010201535 years
Atria Park of Lake ForestSanfordFL
3,589
32,586
4,027
3,886
36,316
40,202
8,356
31,846
2002201135 years
Atria Evergreen WoodsSpring HillFL
2,370
28,371
3,510
2,533
31,718
34,251
8,911
25,340
1981201135 years
Atria North PointAlpharettaGA40,221
4,830
78,318
1,700
4,856
79,992
84,848
10,973
73,875
2007201435 years
Atria BuckheadAtlantaGA
3,660
5,274
969
3,688
6,215
9,903
2,091
7,812
1996201135 years
Atria MabletonAustellGA
1,911
18,879
479
1,946
19,323
21,269
3,447
17,822
2000201335 years
Atria Johnson FerryMariettaGA
990
6,453
657
995
7,105
8,100
1,895
6,205
1995201135 years
Atria Park of TuckerTuckerGA
1,103
20,679
605
1,120
21,267
22,387
3,756
18,631
2000201335 years
Atria Park of Glen EllynGlen EllynIL
2,455
34,064
3,060
2,634
36,945
39,579
12,230
27,349
2000200735 years
Atria NewburghNewburghIN
1,150
22,880
748
1,150
23,628
24,778
5,335
19,443
1998201135 years
Atria Hearthstone EastTopekaKS
1,150
20,544
1,018
1,215
21,497
22,712
5,306
17,406
1998201135 years
Atria Hearthstone WestTopekaKS
1,230
28,379
2,322
1,245
30,686
31,931
7,885
24,046
1987201135 years
Atria Highland CrossingCovingtonKY
1,677
14,393
1,440
1,689
15,821
17,510
4,554
12,956
1988201135 years
Atria Summit HillsCrestview HillsKY
1,780
15,769
884
1,789
16,644
18,433
4,255
14,178
1998201135 years
Atria ElizabethtownElizabethtownKY
850
12,510
658
869
13,149
14,018
3,175
10,843
1996201135 years
Atria St. MatthewsLouisvilleKY
939
9,274
1,147
953
10,407
11,360
3,347
8,013
1998201135 years
Atria Stony BrookLouisvilleKY
1,860
17,561
1,177
1,953
18,645
20,598
4,581
16,017
1999201135 years
Atria SpringdaleLouisvilleKY
1,410
16,702
1,255
1,410
17,957
19,367
4,463
14,904
1999201135 years
Atria Marland PlaceAndoverMA
1,831
34,592
19,314
1,996
53,741
55,737
14,791
40,946
1996201135 years
Atria Longmeadow PlaceBurlingtonMA
5,310
58,021
1,483
5,383
59,431
64,814
12,734
52,080
1998201135 years
Atria FairhavenFairhavenMA
1,100
16,093
861
1,148
16,906
18,054
3,868
14,186
1999201135 years
Atria Woodbriar PlaceFalmouthMA15,940
4,630
27,314
5,566
6,433
31,077
37,510
6,341
31,169
2013201335 years
Atria Woodbriar ParkFalmouthMA
1,970
43,693
21,194
2,599
64,258
66,857
11,987
54,870
1975201135 years
Atria Draper PlaceHopedaleMA
1,140
17,794
1,533
1,234
19,233
20,467
4,575
15,892
1998201135 years
Atria Merrimack PlaceNewburyportMA
2,774
40,645
1,896
2,822
42,493
45,315
9,006
36,309
2000201135 years
Atria Marina PlaceQuincyMA
2,590
33,899
1,589
2,755
35,323
38,078
8,150
29,928
1999201135 years
Riverheights TerraceBrandonMB
799
27,708
(1,193)739
26,575
27,314
3,385
23,929
2001201435 years
Amber MeadowWinnipegMB
3,047
17,821
(431)2,817
17,620
20,437
2,685
17,752
2000201435 years
The WesthavenWinnipegMB
871
23,162
(1,222)816
21,995
22,811
2,959
19,852
1988201435 years

 Location Initial Cost to CompanyGross Amount Carried at Close of Period   
Property NameCityState /
Province
EncumbrancesLand and
Improvements
Buildings and
Improvements
Costs
Capitalized
Subsequent
to Acquisition1
Land and
Improvements
Buildings and
Improvements
TotalAccumulated
Depreciation
NBVYear of
Construction
Year
Acquired
Life on
Which
Depreciation
in Income
Statement
is Computed
Atria on the HudsonOssiningNY8,123 63,089 5,583 8,217 68,578 76,795 23,548 53,247 1972201135 years
Atria PlainviewPlainviewNY2,480 16,060 2,445 2,666 18,319 20,985 6,496 14,489 2000201135 years
Atria Rye BrookPort ChesterNY9,660 74,936 3,632 9,751 78,477 88,228 24,361 63,867 2004201135 years
Atria Kew GardensQueensNY3,051 66,013 9,460 3,081 75,443 78,524 25,005 53,519 1999201135 years
Atria Forest HillsQueensNY2,050 16,680 2,312 2,074 18,968 21,042 6,487 14,555 2001201135 years
Atria on Roslyn HarborRoslynNY65,000 12,909 72,720 3,143 12,974 75,798 88,772 23,819 64,953 2006201135 years
Atria GuilderlandSlingerlandsNY1,170 22,414 1,027 1,210 23,401 24,611 7,540 17,071 1950201135 years
Atria South SetauketSouth SetauketNY8,450 14,534 2,347 8,842 16,489 25,331 7,528 17,803 1967201135 years
Atria Southpoint WalkDurhamNC2,130 25,920 1,673 2,135 27,588 29,723 7,806 21,917 2009201335 years
Atria OakridgeRaleighNC1,482 28,838 1,803 1,519 30,604 32,123 8,750 23,373 2009201335 years
Atria BethlehemBethlehemPA2,479 22,870 1,466 2,500 24,315 26,815 8,353 18,462 1998201135 years
Atria Center CityPhiladelphiaPA3,460 18,291 18,490 3,535 36,706 40,241 13,623 26,618 1964201135 years
Atria South HillsPittsburghPA880 10,884 1,187 940 12,011 12,951 4,512 8,439 1998201135 years
Atria Bay Spring VillageBarringtonRI2,000 33,400 3,245 2,103 36,542 38,645 13,037 25,608 2000201135 years
Atria HarborhillEast GreenwichRI2,089 21,702 2,003 2,186 23,608 25,794 8,175 17,619 1835201135 years
Atria Lincoln PlaceLincolnRI1,440 12,686 1,615 1,475 14,266 15,741 5,461 10,280 2000201135 years
Atria Aquidneck PlacePortsmouthRI2,810 31,623 1,358 2,814 32,977 35,791 10,251 25,540 1999201135 years
Atria Forest LakeColumbiaSC670 13,946 1,211 693 15,134 15,827 4,988 10,839 1999201135 years
Atria Weston PlaceKnoxvilleTN793 7,961 1,655 969 9,440 10,409 3,559 6,850 1993201135 years
Atria at the ArboretumAustinTX8,280 61,764 3,715 8,377 65,382 73,759 18,129 55,630 2009201235 years
Atria CarrolltonCarrolltonTX5,108 360 20,465 1,882 370 22,337 22,707 7,588 15,119 1998201135 years
Atria GrapevineGrapevineTX2,070 23,104 2,109 2,092 25,191 27,283 8,020 19,263 1999201135 years
Atria WestchaseHoustonTX2,318 22,278 1,653 2,347 23,902 26,249 8,030 18,219 1999201135 years
Atria Cinco RanchKatyTX3,171 73,287 2,195 3,201 75,452 78,653 14,713 63,940 2010201535 years
Atria KingwoodKingwoodTX1,170 4,518 1,141 1,213 5,616 6,829 2,397 4,432 1998201135 years
Atria at HometownNorth Richland HillsTX1,932 30,382 3,130 1,963 33,481 35,444 9,642 25,802 2007201335 years
Atria Canyon CreekPlanoTX3,110 45,999 3,932 3,148 49,893 53,041 14,590 38,451 2009201335 years
Atria CypresswoodSpringTX880 9,192 680 984 9,768 10,752 3,938 6,814 1996201135 years
Atria Sugar LandSugar LandTX970 17,542 1,110 980 18,642 19,622 6,211 13,411 1999201135 years
Atria CopelandTylerTX1,879 17,901 2,239 1,913 20,106 22,019 6,642 15,377 1997201135 years
Atria Willow ParkTylerTX920 31,271 2,041 986 33,246 34,232 11,078 23,154 1985201135 years
Atria Virginia BeachVirginia BeachVA1,749 33,004 1,162 1,815 34,100 35,915 11,130 24,785 1998201135 years
Arbour LakeCalgaryAB2,512 39,188 (2,110)2,304 37,286 39,590 8,334 31,256 2003201435 years
Canyon MeadowsCalgaryAB1,617 30,803 (1,473)1,483 29,464 30,947 6,879 24,068 1995201435 years
Churchill ManorEdmontonAB2,865 30,482 (1,423)2,627 29,297 31,924 6,693 25,231 1999201435 years
The View at LethbridgeLethbridgeAB2,503 24,770 (1,135)2,306 23,832 26,138 5,791 20,347 2007201435 years
Victoria ParkRed DeerAB1,188 22,554 (268)1,087 22,387 23,474 5,565 17,909 1999201435 years
Ironwood EstatesSt. AlbertAB3,639 22,519 (462)3,360 22,336 25,696 5,574 20,122 1998201435 years
133


 Location Initial Cost to Company Gross Amount Carried at Close of Period      
Property NameCity
State /
Province
Encumbrances
Land and
Improvements
Buildings and
Improvements
Costs
Capitalized
Subsequent
to Acquisition
Land and
Improvements
Buildings and
Improvements
Total
Accumulated
Depreciation
NBV
Year of
Construction
Year
Acquired
Life on
Which
Depreciation
in Income
Statement
is Computed
Atria ManresaAnnapolisMD
4,193
19,000
1,822
4,465
20,550
25,015
5,052
19,963
1920201135 years
Atria SalisburySalisburyMD
1,940
24,500
780
1,959
25,261
27,220
5,557
21,663
1995201135 years
Atria KennebunkKennebunkME
1,090
23,496
1,127
1,117
24,596
25,713
5,806
19,907
1998201135 years
Atria Park of Ann ArborAnn ArborMI
1,703
15,857
2,055
1,806
17,809
19,615
6,437
13,178
2001200735 years
Atria KinghavenRiverviewMI13,029
1,440
26,260
1,911
1,598
28,013
29,611
6,994
22,617
1987201135 years
Ste. Anne's CourtFrederictonNB
1,221
29,626
(1,214)1,131
28,502
29,633
3,580
26,053
2002201435 years
Chateau de ChamplainSt. JohnNB
796
24,577
(854)747
23,772
24,519
3,174
21,345
2002201435 years
Atria MerryWoodCharlotteNC
1,678
36,892
2,487
1,724
39,333
41,057
9,919
31,138
1991201135 years
Atria Southpoint WalkDurhamNC15,921
2,130
25,920
912
2,135
26,827
28,962
4,921
24,041
2009201335 years
Atria OakridgeRaleighNC14,768
1,482
28,838
1,017
1,519
29,818
31,337
5,435
25,902
2009201335 years
Atria CranfordCranfordNJ25,067
8,260
61,411
4,730
8,382
66,019
74,401
15,581
58,820
1993201135 years
Atria Tinton FallsTinton FallsNJ
6,580
13,258
1,257
6,756
14,339
21,095
4,324
16,771
1999201135 years
Atria SunlakeLas VegasNV
7
732
958
15
1,682
1,697
1,664
33
1998201135 years
Atria SuttonLas VegasNV

863
1,130
48
1,945
1,993
1,697
296
1998201135 years
Atria SevilleLas VegasNV

796
1,452
11
2,237
2,248
1,427
821
1999201135 years
Atria Summit RidgeRenoNV
4
407
546
20
937
957
802
155
1997201135 years
Atria ShakerAlbanyNY
1,520
29,667
1,217
1,626
30,778
32,404
7,071
25,333
1997201135 years
Atria CrossgateAlbanyNY
1,080
20,599
1,089
1,100
21,668
22,768
5,221
17,547
1980201135 years
Atria WoodlandsArdsleyNY45,490
7,660
65,581
2,397
7,718
67,920
75,638
15,345
60,293
2005201135 years
Atria Bay ShoreBay ShoreNY15,275
4,440
31,983
1,853
4,448
33,828
38,276
7,914
30,362
1900201135 years
Atria Briarcliff ManorBriarcliff ManorNY
6,560
33,885
2,003
6,725
35,723
42,448
8,673
33,775
1997201135 years
Atria RiverdaleBronxNY
1,020
24,149
14,480
1,069
38,580
39,649
10,524
29,125
1999201135 years
Atria Delmar PlaceDelmarNY
1,201
24,850
719
1,219
25,551
26,770
3,733
23,037
2004201335 years
Atria East NorthportEast NorthportNY
9,960
34,467
19,448
10,211
53,664
63,875
11,420
52,455
1996201135 years
Atria Glen CoveGlen CoveNY
2,035
25,190
1,123
2,057
26,291
28,348
11,551
16,797
1997201135 years
Atria Great NeckGreat NeckNY
3,390
54,051
19,217
3,390
73,268
76,658
11,785
64,873
1998201135 years
Atria Cutter MillGreat NeckNY
2,750
47,919
2,867
2,761
50,775
53,536
10,914
42,622
1999201135 years
Atria HuntingtonHuntington StationNY
8,190
1,169
2,491
8,232
3,618
11,850
2,056
9,794
1987201135 years
Atria Hertlin PlaceLake RonkonkomaNY
7,886
16,391
1,944
7,886
18,335
26,221
3,768
22,453
2002201235 years
Atria LynbrookLynbrookNY
3,145
5,489
1,187
3,176
6,645
9,821
2,344
7,477
1996201135 years
Atria TanglewoodLynbrookNY24,095
4,120
37,348
935
4,145
38,258
42,403
8,408
33,995
2005201135 years
Atria West 86New YorkNY
80
73,685
5,856
167
79,454
79,621
18,543
61,078
1998201135 years
Atria on the HudsonOssiningNY
8,123
63,089
4,114
8,191
67,135
75,326
16,163
59,163
1972201135 years
Atria PenfieldPenfieldNY
620
22,036
967
723
22,900
23,623
5,383
18,240
1972201135 years
Atria PlainviewPlainviewNY
2,480
16,060
1,590
2,630
17,500
20,130
4,446
15,684
2000201135 years
Atria Rye BrookPort ChesterNY41,514
9,660
74,936
1,944
9,726
76,814
86,540
16,836
69,704
2004201135 years
Atria Kew GardensQueensNY
3,051
66,013
8,272
3,079
74,257
77,336
16,232
61,104
1999201135 years
Atria Forest HillsQueensNY
2,050
16,680
1,244
2,074
17,900
19,974
4,360
15,614
2001201135 years

 Location Initial Cost to CompanyGross Amount Carried at Close of Period   
Property NameCityState /
Province
EncumbrancesLand and
Improvements
Buildings and
Improvements
Costs
Capitalized
Subsequent
to Acquisition1
Land and
Improvements
Buildings and
Improvements
TotalAccumulated
Depreciation
NBVYear of
Construction
Year
Acquired
Life on
Which
Depreciation
in Income
Statement
is Computed
Longlake ChateauNanaimoBC1,874 22,910 (761)1,717 22,306 24,023 5,661 18,362 1990201435 years
Prince George ChateauPrince GeorgeBC2,066 22,761 (786)1,891 22,150 24,041 5,493 18,548 2005201435 years
The VictorianVictoriaBC3,419 16,351 (132)3,162 16,476 19,638 4,406 15,232 1988201435 years
The Victorian at McKenzieVictoriaBC4,801 25,712 (709)4,394 25,410 29,804 6,251 23,553 2003201435 years
Riverheights TerraceBrandonMB799 27,708 (750)735 27,022 27,757 6,492 21,265 2001201435 years
Amber MeadowWinnipegMB3,047 17,821 (22)2,789 18,057 20,846 5,118 15,728 2000201435 years
The WesthavenWinnipegMB871 23,162 (222)829 22,982 23,811 5,611 18,200 1988201435 years
Ste. Anne's CourtFrederictonNB1,221 29,626 (1,216)1,129 28,502 29,631 6,787 22,844 2002201435 years
Chateau de ChamplainSt. JohnNB796 24,577 (324)746 24,303 25,049 6,121 18,928 2002201435 years
The Court at BrooklinBrooklinON2,515 35,602 (1,118)2,539 34,460 36,999 7,905 29,094 2004201435 years
Burlington GardensBurlingtonON7,560 50,744 (3,211)6,925 48,168 55,093 10,423 44,670 2008201435 years
The Court at RushdaleHamiltonON1,799 34,633 (1,486)1,643 33,303 34,946 7,735 27,211 2004201435 years
Kingsdale ChateauKingstonON2,221 36,272 (1,440)2,097 34,956 37,053 8,044 29,009 2000201435 years
The Court at BarrhavenNepeanON1,778 33,922 (1,241)1,685 32,774 34,459 7,818 26,641 2004201435 years
Crystal View LodgeNepeanON1,587 37,243 (799)1,669 36,362 38,031 8,277 29,754 2000201435 years
Stamford EstatesNiagara FallsON1,414 29,439 (1,145)1,291 28,417 29,708 6,498 23,210 2005201435 years
Sherbrooke HeightsPeterboroughON2,485 33,747 (1,250)2,277 32,705 34,982 7,745 27,237 2001201435 years
Anchor PointeSt. CatharinesON8,214 24,056 (349)7,544 24,377 31,921 6,128 25,793 2000201435 years
The Court at Pringle CreekWhitbyON2,965 39,206 (2,347)2,780 37,044 39,824 8,495 31,329 2002201435 years
La Residence StegerSaint-LaurentQC1,995 10,926 1,542 1,926 12,537 14,463 3,906 10,557 1999201435 years
Mulberry EstatesMoose JawSK2,173 31,791 (1,371)2,094 30,499 32,593 7,219 25,374 2003201435 years
Queen Victoria EstatesReginaSK3,018 34,109 (1,523)2,770 32,834 35,604 7,644 27,960 2000201435 years
Primrose ChateauSaskatoonSK2,611 32,729 (899)2,459 31,982 34,441 7,458 26,983 1996201435 years
AmberwoodPort RicheyFlorida1,320 1,320 1,320 1,320 N/A2011N/A
Atria Development & Construction Fees163 163 163 163 CIPCIPCIP
TOTAL FOR ATRIA SENIOR HOUSING COMMUNITIES207,400 535,915 4,731,839 568,954 556,362 5,280,346 5,836,708 1,657,519 4,179,189 
OTHER SENIOR HOUSING COMMUNITIES          
Elmcroft of Grayson ValleyBirminghamAL1,040 19,145 (4,072)1,046 15,067 16,113 6,102 10,011 2000201135 years
Elmcroft of Byrd SpringsHunstvilleAL1,720 11,270 1,443 1,729 12,704 14,433 4,253 10,180 1999201135 years
Elmcroft of Heritage WoodsMobileAL1,020 10,241 1,217 1,027 11,451 12,478 3,814 8,664 2000201135 years
Rosewood ManorScottsboroAL680 4,038 680 4,038 4,718 1,202 3,516 1998201135 years
Chandler Memory Care CommunityChandlerAZ2,910 8,882 184 3,094 8,882 11,976 2,681 9,295 2012201235 years
Silver Creek Inn Memory Care CommunityGilbertAZ890 5,918 890 5,918 6,808 1,664 5,144 2012201235 years
Prestige Assisted Living at Green ValleyGreen ValleyAZ1,227 13,977 1,227 13,977 15,204 2,779 12,425 1998201435 years
134


 Location Initial Cost to Company Gross Amount Carried at Close of Period      
Property NameCity
State /
Province
Encumbrances
Land and
Improvements
Buildings and
Improvements
Costs
Capitalized
Subsequent
to Acquisition
Land and
Improvements
Buildings and
Improvements
Total
Accumulated
Depreciation
NBV
Year of
Construction
Year
Acquired
Life on
Which
Depreciation
in Income
Statement
is Computed
Atria GreeceRochesterNY
410
14,967
1,041
639
15,779
16,418
3,893
12,525
1970201135 years
Atria on Roslyn HarborRoslynNY65,000
12,909
72,720
2,231
12,974
74,886
87,860
16,287
71,573
2006201135 years
Atria GuilderlandSlingerlandsNY
1,170
22,414
601
1,171
23,014
24,185
5,225
18,960
1950201135 years
Atria South SetauketSouth SetauketNY
8,450
14,534
1,514
8,832
15,666
24,498
5,403
19,095
1967201135 years
The Court at BrooklinBrooklinON
2,515
35,602
(1,674)2,346
34,097
36,443
4,141
32,302
2004201435 years
Burlington GardensBurlingtonON
7,560
50,744
(3,614)7,009
47,681
54,690
5,602
49,088
2008201435 years
The Court at RushdaleHamiltonON
1,799
34,633
(1,379)1,663
33,390
35,053
4,040
31,013
2004201435 years
Kingsdale ChateauKingstonON
2,221
36,272
(1,383)2,059
35,051
37,110
4,247
32,863
2000201435 years
Crystal View LodgeNepeanON
1,587
37,243
(1,274)1,657
35,899
37,556
4,354
33,202
2000201435 years
The Court at BarrhavenNepeanON
1,778
33,922
(1,218)1,667
32,815
34,482
4,110
30,372
2004201435 years
Stamford EstatesNiagara FallsON
1,414
29,439
(1,744)1,307
27,802
29,109
3,525
25,584
2005201435 years
Sherbrooke HeightsPeterboroughON
2,485
33,747
(1,280)2,300
32,652
34,952
4,122
30,830
2001201435 years
Anchor PointeSt. CatharinesON
8,214
24,056
(1,790)7,593
22,887
30,480
3,259
27,221
2000201435 years
The Court at Pringle CreekWhitbyON
2,965
39,206
(2,173)2,796
37,202
39,998
4,599
35,399
2002201435 years
Atria BethlehemBethlehemPA
2,479
22,870
872
2,492
23,729
26,221
5,905
20,316
1998201135 years
Atria Center CityPhiladelphiaPA
3,460
18,291
15,109
3,475
33,385
36,860
5,427
31,433
1964201135 years
Atria Woodbridge PlacePhoenixvillePA
1,510
19,130
990
1,526
20,104
21,630
4,941
16,689
1996201135 years
Atria South HillsPittsburghPA
880
10,884
764
913
11,615
12,528
3,221
9,307
1998201135 years
La Residence StegerSaint-LaurentQC
1,995
10,926
425
1,884
11,462
13,346
1,912
11,434
1999201435 years
Atria Bay Spring VillageBarringtonRI
2,000
33,400
2,613
2,080
35,933
38,013
9,137
28,876
2000201135 years
Atria HarborhillEast GreenwichRI
2,089
21,702
1,519
2,179
23,131
25,310
5,562
19,748
1835201135 years
Atria Lincoln PlaceLincolnRI
1,440
12,686
1,027
1,475
13,678
15,153
3,755
11,398
2000201135 years
Atria Aquidneck PlacePortsmouthRI
2,810
31,623
865
2,814
32,484
35,298
7,007
28,291
1999201135 years
Atria Forest LakeColumbiaSC
670
13,946
837
684
14,769
15,453
3,451
12,002
1999201135 years
Primrose ChateauSaskatoonSK
2,611
32,729
(1,634)2,484
31,222
33,706
3,885
29,821
1996201435 years
Mulberry EstatesMoose JawSK
2,173
31,791
(1,381)2,103
30,480
32,583
3,829
28,754
2003201435 years
Queen Victoria EstatesReginaSK
3,018
34,109
(1,596)2,789
32,742
35,531
4,019
31,512
2000201435 years
Atria Weston PlaceKnoxvilleTN9,158
793
7,961
1,113
967
8,900
9,867
2,482
7,385
1993201135 years
Atria at the ArboretumAustinTX
8,280
61,764
923
8,342
62,625
70,967
11,628
59,339
2009201235 years
Atria CarrolltonCarrolltonTX6,259
360
20,465
1,270
370
21,725
22,095
5,247
16,848
1998201135 years
Atria GrapevineGrapevineTX
2,070
23,104
789
2,080
23,883
25,963
5,523
20,440
1999201135 years
Atria WestchaseHoustonTX
2,318
22,278
1,075
2,322
23,349
25,671
5,578
20,093
1999201135 years
Atria Cinco RanchKatyTX
3,171
73,287
967
3,176
74,249
77,425
6,972
70,453
2010201535 years
Atria KingwoodKingwoodTX
1,170
4,518
697
1,192
5,193
6,385
1,644
4,741
1998201135 years
Atria at HometownNorth Richland HillsTX
1,932
30,382
1,294
1,963
31,645
33,608
5,945
27,663
2007201335 years
Atria Canyon CreekPlanoTX
3,110
45,999
1,360
3,148
47,321
50,469
8,528
41,941
2009201335 years
Atria RichardsonRichardsonTX
1,590
23,662
1,178
1,600
24,830
26,430
5,570
20,860
1998201135 years
Atria CypresswoodSpringTX
880
9,192
(2,884)897
6,291
7,188
2,466
4,722
1996201135 years

 Location Initial Cost to CompanyGross Amount Carried at Close of Period   
Property NameCityState /
Province
EncumbrancesLand and
Improvements
Buildings and
Improvements
Costs
Capitalized
Subsequent
to Acquisition1
Land and
Improvements
Buildings and
Improvements
TotalAccumulated
Depreciation
NBVYear of
Construction
Year
Acquired
Life on
Which
Depreciation
in Income
Statement
is Computed
Prestige Assisted Living at Lake Havasu CityLake HavasuAZ594 14,792 594 14,792 15,386 2,925 12,461 1999201435 years
Arbor RoseMesaAZ1,100 11,880 2,434 1,100 14,314 15,414 5,874 9,540 1999201135 years
The StratfordPhoenixAZ1,931 33,576 1,221 1,931 34,797 36,728 6,765 29,963 2001201435 years
Amber Creek Inn Memory CareScottsdaleAZ2,310 6,322 677 2,185 7,124 9,309 1,236 8,073 19862011 35 years
Prestige Assisted Living at Sierra VistaSierra VistaAZ295 13,224 295 13,224 13,519 2,610 10,909 1999201435 years
Rock Creek Memory Care CommunitySurpriseAZ9,687 826 16,353 826 16,356 17,182 1,666 15,516 2017201735 years
Elmcroft of TempeTempeAZ1,090 12,942 1,846 1,098 14,780 15,878 4,861 11,017 1999201135 years
Elmcroft of River CentreTucsonAZ1,940 5,195 1,374 1,940 6,569 8,509 2,549 5,960 1999201135 years
West ShoresHot SpringsAR1,326 10,904 2,091 1,326 12,995 14,321 5,572 8,749 1988200535 years
Elmcroft of MaumelleMaumelleAR1,252 7,601 682 1,359 8,176 9,535 3,346 6,189 1997200635 years
Elmcroft of Mountain HomeMountain HomeAR204 8,971 521 204 9,492 9,696 3,889 5,807 1997200635 years
Elmcroft of SherwoodSherwoodAR1,320 5,693 623 1,323 6,313 7,636 2,603 5,033 1997200635 years
Sierra Ridge Memory CareAuburnCA681 6,071 681 6,071 6,752 1,211 5,541 2011201435 years
Careage BanningBanningCA2,970 16,037 2,970 16,037 19,007 5,038 13,969 2004201135 years
Las Villas Del CarlsbadCarlsbadCA1,760 30,469 5,561 1,890 35,900 37,790 13,124 24,666 1987200635 years
Prestige Assisted Living at ChicoChicoCA1,069 14,929 1,069 14,929 15,998 2,962 13,036 1998201435 years
The Meadows Senior LivingElk GroveCA1,308 19,667 1,308 19,667 20,975 3,868 17,107 2003201435 years
Alder Bay Assisted LivingEurekaCA1,170 5,228 (70)1,170 5,158 6,328 1,729 4,599 1997201135 years
CedarbrookFresnoCA1,652 12,613 1,652 12,613 14,265 1,625 12,640 2014201735 years
Elmcroft of La MesaLa MesaCA2,431 6,101 (1,369)2,431 4,732 7,163 2,536 4,627 1997200635 years
Grossmont GardensLa MesaCA9,104 59,349 3,631 9,115 62,969 72,084 25,444 46,640 1964200635 years
Palms, TheLa MiradaCA2,700 43,919 (260)2,700 43,659 46,359 9,321 37,038 1990201335 years
Prestige Assisted Living at LancasterLancasterCA718 10,459 718 10,459 11,177 2,075 9,102 1999201435 years
Prestige Assisted Living at MarysvilleMarysvilleCA741 7,467 741 7,467 8,208 1,487 6,721 1999201435 years
Mountview Retirement ResidenceMontroseCA1,089 15,449 3,208 1,089 18,657 19,746 6,603 13,143 1974200635 years
Redwood RetirementNapaCA2,798 12,639 133 2,798 12,772 15,570 2,711 12,859 1986201335 years
Prestige Assisted Living at OrovilleOrovilleCA638 8,079 638 8,079 8,717 1,605 7,112 1999201435 years
Valencia CommonsRancho CucamongaCA1,439 36,363 (418)1,439 35,945 37,384 7,687 29,697 2002201335 years
Shasta EstatesReddingCA1,180 23,463 (58)1,180 23,405 24,585 4,983 19,602 2009201335 years
The VistasReddingCA1,290 22,033 1,290 22,033 23,323 6,561 16,762 2007201135 years
Elmcroft of Point LomaSan DiegoCA2,117 6,865 (1,416)16 7,550 7,566 2,935 4,631 1999200635 years
Villa Santa BarbaraSanta BarbaraCA1,219 12,426 5,357 1,219 17,783 19,002 6,522 12,480 1977200535 years
Oak Terrace Memory CareSoulsbyvilleCA1,146 5,275 1,146 5,275 6,421 1,067 5,354 1999201435 years
Skyline Place Senior LivingSonoraCA1,815 28,472 1,815 28,472 30,287 5,620 24,667 1996201435 years
Eagle Lake VillageSusanvilleCA1,165 6,719 1,165 6,719 7,884 1,778 6,106 2006201235 years
Bonaventure, TheVenturaCA5,294 32,747 (496)5,294 32,251 37,545 6,936 30,609 2005201335 years
Sterling InnVictorvilleCA12,558 733 18,564 6,925 733 25,489 26,222 2,514 23,708 1992201735 years
135
 Location Initial Cost to Company Gross Amount Carried at Close of Period      
Property NameCity
State /
Province
Encumbrances
Land and
Improvements
Buildings and
Improvements
Costs
Capitalized
Subsequent
to Acquisition
Land and
Improvements
Buildings and
Improvements
Total
Accumulated
Depreciation
NBV
Year of
Construction
Year
Acquired
Life on
Which
Depreciation
in Income
Statement
is Computed
Atria Sugar LandSugar LandTX
970
17,542
885
980
18,417
19,397
4,338
15,059
1999201135 years
Atria CopelandTylerTX
1,879
17,901
874
1,888
18,766
20,654
4,613
16,041
1997201135 years
Atria Willow ParkTylerTX
920
31,271
1,169
982
32,378
33,360
7,815
25,545
1985201135 years
Atria Virginia BeachVirginia BeachVA
1,749
33,004
710
1,754
33,709
35,463
7,919
27,544
1998201135 years
AmberwoodPort RicheyFL
1,320


1,320

1,320

1,320
N/A2011N/A
Atria Development & Construction Fees  

428


428
428

428
CIPCIPCIP
TOTAL FOR ATRIA SENIORS HOUSING COMMUNITIES  442,048
548,972
5,010,620
387,770
558,443
5,388,919
5,947,362
1,111,490
4,835,872
   
OTHER SENIORS HOUSING COMMUNITIES              
Elmcroft of Grayson ValleyBirminghamAL
1,040
19,145
495
1,046
19,634
20,680
4,174
16,506
2000201135 years
Elmcroft of Byrd SpringsHunstvilleAL
1,720
11,270
468
1,723
11,735
13,458
2,733
10,725
1999201135 years
Elmcroft of Heritage WoodsMobileAL
1,020
10,241
489
1,020
10,730
11,750
2,526
9,224
2000201135 years
Elmcroft of HalcyonMontgomeryAL
220
5,476
16
220
5,492
5,712
1,748
3,964
1999200635 years
Rosewood ManorScottsboroAL
680
4,038

680
4,038
4,718
847
3,871
1998201135 years
West ShoresHot SpringsAR
1,326
10,904
1,200
1,326
12,104
13,430
3,928
9,502
1988200535 years
Elmcroft of MaumelleMaumelleAR
1,252
7,601
22
1,252
7,623
8,875
2,426
6,449
1997200635 years
Elmcroft of Mountain HomeMountain HomeAR
204
8,971
5
204
8,976
9,180
2,863
6,317
1997200635 years
Elmcroft of SherwoodSherwoodAR
1,320
5,693
24
1,320
5,717
7,037
1,817
5,220
1997200635 years
Chandler Memory Care CommunityChandlerAZ
2,910
8,882
184
3,094
8,882
11,976
1,891
10,085
2012201235 years
Silver Creek Inn Memory Care CommunityGilbertAZ
890
5,918

890
5,918
6,808
1,150
5,658
2012201235 years
Prestige Assisted Living at Green ValleyGreen ValleyAZ
1,227
13,977

1,227
13,977
15,204
1,442
13,762
1998201435 years
Prestige Assisted Living at Lake Havasu CityLake HavasuAZ
594
14,792

594
14,792
15,386
1,517
13,869
1999201435 years
Lakeview TerraceLake Havasu CityAZ
706
7,810
96
706
7,906
8,612
840
7,772
2009201535 years
Arbor RoseMesaAZ
1,100
11,880
2,434
1,100
14,314
15,414
4,176
11,238
1999201135 years
The StratfordPhoenixAZ
1,931
33,576

1,931
33,576
35,507
3,453
32,054
2001201435 years
Amber Creek Inn Memory CareScottsdaleAZ
2,310
6,322
677
2,185
7,124
9,309
528
8,781
1986201135 years
Prestige Assisted Living at Sierra VistaSierra VistaAZ
295
13,224

295
13,224
13,519
1,353
12,166
1999201435 years
The Woodmark at Sun CitySun CityAZ
964
35,093
531
1,003
35,585
36,588
3,329
33,259
2000201535 years
Rock Creek Memory Care CommunitySurpriseAZ10,228
826
16,353

826
16,353
17,179
45
17,134
2017201735 years
Elmcroft of TempeTempeAZ
1,090
12,942
855
1,090
13,797
14,887
3,143
11,744
1999201135 years
Elmcroft of River CentreTucsonAZ
1,940
5,195
462
1,940
5,657
7,597
1,531
6,066
1999201135 years
Sierra Ridge Memory CareAuburnCA
681
6,071

681
6,071
6,752
643
6,109
2011201435 years
Careage BanningBanningCA
2,970
16,037

2,970
16,037
19,007
3,567
15,440
2004201135 years
Las Villas Del CarlsbadCarlsbadCA
1,760
30,469
3
1,760
30,472
32,232
9,721
22,511
1987200635 years
Prestige Assisted Living at ChicoChicoCA
1,069
14,929

1,069
14,929
15,998
1,537
14,461
1998201435 years



 Location Initial Cost to CompanyGross Amount Carried at Close of Period   
Property NameCityState /
Province
EncumbrancesLand and
Improvements
Buildings and
Improvements
Costs
Capitalized
Subsequent
to Acquisition1
Land and
Improvements
Buildings and
Improvements
TotalAccumulated
Depreciation
NBVYear of
Construction
Year
Acquired
Life on
Which
Depreciation
in Income
Statement
is Computed
Sterling CommonsVictorvilleCA5,850 768 13,124 768 13,124 13,892 1,632 12,260 1994201735 years
Prestige Assisted Living at VisaliaVisaliaCA1,300 8,378 1,300 8,378 9,678 1,679 7,999 1998201435 years
Highland TrailBroomfieldCO2,511 26,431 (370)2,511 26,061 28,572 5,596 22,976 2009201335 years
Caley RidgeEnglewoodCO1,157 13,133 1,157 13,133 14,290 3,476 10,814 1999201235 years
Garden Square at WestlakeGreeleyCO630 8,211 630 8,211 8,841 2,530 6,311 1998201135 years
Garden Square of GreeleyGreeleyCO330 2,735 330 2,735 3,065 848 2,217 1995201135 years
Lakewood EstatesLakewoodCO1,306 21,137 (2)1,306 21,135 22,441 4,508 17,933 1988201335 years
Sugar Valley EstatesLovelandCO1,255 21,837 (240)1,255 21,597 22,852 4,627 18,225 2009201335 years
Devonshire AcresSterlingCO950 10,092 555 965 10,632 11,597 3,481 8,116 1979201135 years
The Hearth at GardensideBranfordCT7,000 31,518 7,000 31,518 38,518 9,377 29,141 1999201135 years
The Hearth at Tuxis PondMadisonCT1,610 44,322 1,610 44,322 45,932 12,695 33,237 2002201135 years
White OaksManchesterCT2,584 34,507 (474)2,584 34,033 36,617 7,302 29,315 2007201335 years
Hampton Manor BelleviewBelleviewFL390 8,337 100 390 8,437 8,827 2,539 6,288 1988201135 years
Sabal HouseCantonmentFL430 5,902 430 5,902 6,332 1,760 4,572 1999201135 years
Bristol Park of Coral SpringsCoral SpringsFL3,280 11,877 2,372 3,280 14,249 17,529 4,077 13,452 1999201135 years
Stanley HouseDefuniak SpringsFL410 5,659 410 5,659 6,069 1,685 4,384 1999201135 years
Barrington Terrace of Ft. MyersFort MyersFL2,105 18,190 1,659 2,110 19,844 21,954 4,860 17,094 2001201535 years
The PeninsulaHollywoodFL3,660 9,122 1,416 3,660 10,538 14,198 3,499 10,699 1972201135 years
Elmcroft of Timberlin ParcJacksonvilleFL455 5,905 641 455 6,546 7,001 2,714 4,287 1998200635 years
Forsyth HouseMiltonFL610 6,503 610 6,503 7,113 1,923 5,190 1999201135 years
Barrington Terrace of NaplesNaplesFL2,596 18,716 1,750 2,610 20,452 23,062 4,535 18,527 2004201535 years
The Carlisle NaplesNaplesFL8,406 78,091 8,406 78,091 86,497 22,458 64,039 1998201135 years
Naples ALZ DevelopmentNaplesFL2,983 2,983 2,983 2,983 CIPCIP CIP
Hampton Manor at 24th RoadOcalaFL690 8,767 121 690 8,888 9,578 2,613 6,965 1996201135 years
Hampton Manor at DeerwoodOcalaFL790 5,605 3,818 983 9,230 10,213 2,550 7,663 2005201135 years
Las PalmasPalm CoastFL984 30,009 (219)984 29,790 30,774 6,358 24,416 2009201335 years
Elmcroft of PensacolaPensacolaFL2,230 2,362 997 2,240 3,349 5,589 1,143 4,446 1999201135 years
Magnolia HouseQuincyFL400 5,190 400 5,190 5,590 1,567 4,023 1999201135 years
Elmcroft of TallahasseeTallahasseeFL2,430 17,745 435 2,448 18,162 20,610 5,465 15,145 1999201135 years
Tallahassee Memory CareTallahasseeFL640 8,013 (5,473)653 2,527 3,180 2,153 1,027 1999201135 years
Bristol Park of TamaracTamaracFL3,920 14,130 2,207 3,920 16,337 20,257 4,720 15,537 2000201135 years
Elmcroft of CarrolwoodTampaFL5,410 20,944 (7,544)5,417 13,393 18,810 6,992 11,818 2001201135 years
Arbor Terrace of AthensAthensGA1,767 16,442 683 1,777 17,115 18,892 3,775 15,117 1998201535 years
Arbor Terrace at CascadeAtlantaGA3,052 9,040 956 3,057 9,991 13,048 3,089 9,959 1999201535 years
Augusta GardensAugustaGA530 10,262 308 543 10,557 11,100 3,286 7,814 1997201135 years
Benton House of CovingtonCovingtonGA1,297 11,397 441 1,298 11,837 13,135 2,676 10,459 2009201535 years
Arbor Terrace of DecaturDecaturGA3,102 19,599 (403)1,298 21,000 22,298 4,459 17,839 1990201535 years
Benton House of DouglasvilleDouglasvilleGA1,697 15,542 224 1,697 15,766 17,463 3,394 14,069 2010201535 years
Elmcroft of MartinezMartinezGA408 6,764 1,054 408 7,818 8,226 2,885 5,341 1997200735 years
136


 Location Initial Cost to Company Gross Amount Carried at Close of Period      
Property NameCity
State /
Province
Encumbrances
Land and
Improvements
Buildings and
Improvements
Costs
Capitalized
Subsequent
to Acquisition
Land and
Improvements
Buildings and
Improvements
Total
Accumulated
Depreciation
NBV
Year of
Construction
Year
Acquired
Life on
Which
Depreciation
in Income
Statement
is Computed
Villa BonitaChula VistaCA
1,610
9,169

1,610
9,169
10,779
2,137
8,642
1989201135 years
The Meadows Senior LivingElk GroveCA
1,308
19,667

1,308
19,667
20,975
2,047
18,928
2003201435 years
Las Villas Del NorteEscondidoCA
2,791
32,632
17
2,791
32,649
35,440
10,412
25,028
1986200635 years
Alder Bay Assisted LivingEurekaCA
1,170
5,228
(70)1,170
5,158
6,328
1,215
5,113
1997201135 years
CedarbrookFresnoCA
1,652
12,613

1,652
12,613
14,265
353
13,912
2014201735 years
Elmcroft of La MesaLa MesaCA
2,431
6,101

2,431
6,101
8,532
1,946
6,586
1997200635 years
Grossmont GardensLa MesaCA
9,104
59,349
71
9,104
59,420
68,524
18,939
49,585
1964200635 years
Palms, TheLa MiradaCA
2,700
43,919

2,700
43,919
46,619
6,243
40,376
1990201335 years
Prestige Assisted Living at LancasterLancasterCA
718
10,459

718
10,459
11,177
1,077
10,100
1999201435 years
Prestige Assisted Living at MarysvilleMarysvilleCA
741
7,467

741
7,467
8,208
772
7,436
1999201435 years
Mountview Retirement ResidenceMontroseCA
1,089
15,449
77
1,089
15,526
16,615
4,933
11,682
1974200635 years
Redwood RetirementNapaCA
2,798
12,639

2,798
12,639
15,437
1,836
13,601
1986201335 years
Prestige Assisted Living at OrovilleOrovilleCA
638
8,079

638
8,079
8,717
833
7,884
1999201435 years
Valencia CommonsRancho CucamongaCA
1,439
36,363

1,439
36,363
37,802
5,154
32,648
2002201335 years
Mission HillsRancho MirageCA
6,800
3,637

6,800
3,637
10,437
1,297
9,140
1999201135 years
Shasta EstatesReddingCA
1,180
23,463

1,180
23,463
24,643
3,330
21,313
2009201335 years
The VistasReddingCA
1,290
22,033

1,290
22,033
23,323
4,555
18,768
2007201135 years
Elmcroft of Point LomaSan DiegoCA
2,117
6,865

2,117
6,865
8,982
2,190
6,792
1999200635 years
Regency of Evergreen ValleySan JoseCA
2,700
7,994

2,700
7,994
10,694
2,222
8,472
1998201135 years
Villa del ObispoSan Juan CapistranoCA
2,660
9,560
331
2,660
9,891
12,551
2,140
10,411
1985201135 years
Villa Santa BarbaraSanta BarbaraCA
1,219
12,426
3,645
1,219
16,071
17,290
4,468
12,822
1977200535 years
Skyline Place Senior LivingSonoraCA
1,815
28,472

1,815
28,472
30,287
2,977
27,310
1996201435 years
Oak Terrace Memory CareSoulsbyvilleCA
1,146
5,275

1,146
5,275
6,421
568
5,853
1999201435 years
Eagle Lake VillageSusanvilleCA
1,165
6,719

1,165
6,719
7,884
1,199
6,685
2006201235 years
Bonaventure, TheVenturaCA
5,294
32,747

5,294
32,747
38,041
4,719
33,322
2005201335 years
Sterling InnVictorvilleCA12,558
733
18,539

733
18,539
19,272
499
18,773
1992201735 years
Sterling CommonsVictorvilleCA5,850
768
13,124

768
13,124
13,892
355
13,537
1994201735 years
Prestige Assisted Living at VisaliaVisaliaCA
1,300
8,378

1,300
8,378
9,678
873
8,805
1998201435 years
Vista VillageVistaCA
1,630
5,640
61
1,630
5,701
7,331
1,454
5,877
1980201135 years
Rancho VistaVistaCA
6,730
21,828
42
6,730
21,870
28,600
6,966
21,634
1982200635 years
Westminster TerraceWestminsterCA
1,700
11,514
22
1,700
11,536
13,236
2,397
10,839
2001201135 years
Highland TrailBroomfieldCO
2,511
26,431

2,511
26,431
28,942
3,774
25,168
2009201335 years
Caley RidgeEnglewoodCO
1,157
13,133

1,157
13,133
14,290
2,343
11,947
1999201235 years
Garden Square at WestlakeGreeleyCO
630
8,211

630
8,211
8,841
1,775
7,066
1998201135 years
Garden Square of GreeleyGreeleyCO
330
2,735

330
2,735
3,065
606
2,459
1995201135 years
Lakewood EstatesLakewoodCO
1,306
21,137

1,306
21,137
22,443
3,005
19,438
1988201335 years
Sugar Valley EstatesLovelandCO
1,255
21,837

1,255
21,837
23,092
3,103
19,989
2009201335 years
Devonshire AcresSterlingCO
950
13,569
(2,922)965
10,632
11,597
2,330
9,267
1979201135 years

 Location Initial Cost to CompanyGross Amount Carried at Close of Period   
Property NameCityState /
Province
EncumbrancesLand and
Improvements
Buildings and
Improvements
Costs
Capitalized
Subsequent
to Acquisition1
Land and
Improvements
Buildings and
Improvements
TotalAccumulated
Depreciation
NBVYear of
Construction
Year
Acquired
Life on
Which
Depreciation
in Income
Statement
is Computed
Benton House of NewnanNewnanGA1,474 17,487 319 1,487 17,793 19,280 3,766 15,514 2010201535 years
Elmcroft of RoswellRoswellGA1,867 15,835 806 1,880 16,628 18,508 3,357 15,151 1997201435 years
Benton Village of StockbridgeStockbridgeGA2,221 21,989 868 2,232 22,846 25,078 5,041 20,037 2008201535 years
Benton House of Sugar HillSugar HillGA2,173 14,937 265 2,183 15,192 17,375 3,446 13,929 2010201535 years
Villas of St. James - Breese, ILBreeseIL671 6,849 671 6,849 7,520 1,657 5,863 2009201535 years
Villas of Holly Brook - Chatham, ILChathamIL1,185 8,910 1,185 8,910 10,095 2,240 7,855 2012201535 years
Villas of Holly Brook - Effingham, ILEffinghamIL508 6,624 508 6,624 7,132 1,565 5,567 2011201535 years
Villas of Holly Brook - Herrin, ILHerrinIL2,175 9,605 2,175 9,605 11,780 2,798 8,982 2012201535 years
Villas of Holly Brook - Marshall, ILMarshallIL1,461 4,881 1,461 4,881 6,342 1,630 4,712 2012201535 years
Villas of Holly Brook - Newton, ILNewtonIL458 4,590 458 4,590 5,048 1,197 3,851 2011201535 years
Rochester Senior Living at WyndcrestRochesterIL570 6,536 249 570 6,785 7,355 1,642 5,713 2005201535 years
Villas of Holly Brook, Shelbyville, ILShelbyvilleIL2,292 3,351 2,292 3,351 5,643 1,810 3,833 2011201535 years
Elmcroft of MuncieMuncieIN244 11,218 1,121 324 12,259 12,583 4,664 7,919 1998200735 years
Wood RidgeSouth BendIN590 4,850 (35)590 4,815 5,405 1,469 3,936 1990201135 years
Elmcroft of Florence (KY)FlorenceKY1,535 21,826 1,067 1,581 22,847 24,428 4,637 19,791 2010201435 years
Hartland HillsLexingtonKY1,468 23,929 (368)1,468 23,561 25,029 5,054 19,975 2001201335 years
Elmcroft of Mount WashingtonMount WashingtonKY758 12,048 840 758 12,888 13,646 2,755 10,891 2005201435 years
Clover HealthcareAuburnME1,400 26,895 876 1,400 27,771 29,171 8,731 20,440 1982201135 years
Gorham HouseGorhamME1,360 33,147 1,472 1,527 34,452 35,979 9,873 26,106 1990201135 years
Kittery EstatesKitteryME1,531 30,811 (321)1,557 30,464 32,021 6,525 25,496 2009201335 years
Woods at CancoPortlandME1,441 45,578 (676)1,474 44,869 46,343 9,616 36,727 2000201335 years
Sentry Inn at York HarborYork HarborME3,490 19,869 3,490 19,869 23,359 5,806 17,553 2000201135 years
Elmcroft of HagerstownHagerstownMD2,010 1,293 561 1,996 1,868 3,864 734 3,130 1999201135 years
Heritage WoodsAgawamMA1,249 4,625 1,249 4,625 5,874 2,818 3,056 1997200430 years
Devonshire EstatesLenoxMA1,832 31,124 (332)1,832 30,792 32,624 6,590 26,034 1998201335 years
Elmcroft of DownriverBrownstown Charter TownshipMI320 32,652 1,360 371 33,961 34,332 9,983 24,349 2000201135 years
Independence Village of East LansingEast LansingMI1,956 18,122 423 1,956 18,545 20,501 4,880 15,621 1989201235 years
Primrose AustinAustinMN2,540 11,707 443 2,540 12,150 14,690 3,540 11,150 2002201135 years
Primrose DuluthDuluthMN6,190 8,296 257 6,245 8,498 14,743 2,774 11,969 2003201135 years
Primrose MankatoMankatoMN1,860 8,920 352 1,860 9,272 11,132 2,985 8,147 1999201135 years
Lodge at White BearWhite Bear LakeMN732 24,999 (129)737 24,865 25,602 5,304 20,298 2002201335 years
Assisted Living at the Meadowlands - O'Fallon, MOO'FallonMO2,326 14,158 2,326 14,158 16,484 3,499 12,985 1999201535 years
Canyon Creek Inn Memory CareBillingsMT420 11,217 420 11,224 11,644 3,193 8,451 2011201135 years
Spring Creek Inn Alzheimer's CommunityBozemanMT1,345 16,877 1,345 16,877 18,222 2,162 16,060 2010201735 years
The Springs at MissoulaMissoulaMT15,616 1,975 34,390 2,076 1,975 36,466 38,441 9,733 28,708 2004201235 years
Crown PointeOmahaNE1,316 11,950 3,118 1,316 15,068 16,384 6,042 10,342 1985200535 years
Prestige Assisted Living at Mira LomaHendersonNV1,279 12,558 1,279 12,558 13,837 2,006 11,831 1998201635 years
Birch HeightsDerryNH1,413 30,267 (304)1,413 29,963 31,376 6,414 24,962 2009201335 years
137


 Location Initial Cost to Company Gross Amount Carried at Close of Period      
Property NameCity
State /
Province
Encumbrances
Land and
Improvements
Buildings and
Improvements
Costs
Capitalized
Subsequent
to Acquisition
Land and
Improvements
Buildings and
Improvements
Total
Accumulated
Depreciation
NBV
Year of
Construction
Year
Acquired
Life on
Which
Depreciation
in Income
Statement
is Computed
The Hearth at GardensideBranfordCT
7,000
31,518

7,000
31,518
38,518
6,517
32,001
1999201135 years
The Hearth at Tuxis PondMadisonCT
1,610
44,322

1,610
44,322
45,932
8,768
37,164
2002201135 years
White OaksManchesterCT
2,584
34,507

2,584
34,507
37,091
4,914
32,177
2007201335 years
Willows Care HomeRomfordUK
4,695
6,983
(970)4,305
6,403
10,708
633
10,075
1986201540 years
Cedars Care HomeSouthend-on-SeaUK
2,649
4,925
(628)2,429
4,517
6,946
460
6,486
2014201540 years
Hampton Manor BelleviewBelleviewFL
390
8,337

390
8,337
8,727
1,781
6,946
1988201135 years
Sabal HouseCantonmentFL
430
5,902

430
5,902
6,332
1,236
5,096
1999201135 years
Bristol Park of Coral SpringsCoral SpringsFL
3,280
11,877
689
3,280
12,566
15,846
2,613
13,233
1999201135 years
Stanley HouseDefuniak SpringsFL
410
5,659

410
5,659
6,069
1,184
4,885
1999201135 years
The PeninsulaHollywoodFL
3,660
9,122
1,307
3,660
10,429
14,089
2,277
11,812
1972201135 years
Elmcroft of Timberlin ParcJacksonvilleFL
455
5,905
5
455
5,910
6,365
1,884
4,481
1998200635 years
Forsyth HouseMiltonFL
610
6,503

610
6,503
7,113
1,348
5,765
1999201135 years
Princeton Village of LargoLargoFL
1,718
10,438
153
1,718
10,591
12,309
1,344
10,965
1992201535 years
Barrington Terrace of Ft. MyersFort MyersFL
2,105
18,190
615
2,110
18,800
20,910
2,167
18,743
2001201535 years
Barrington Terrace of NaplesNaplesFL
2,596
18,716
571
2,608
19,275
21,883
2,188
19,695
2004201535 years
The Carlisle NaplesNaplesFL
8,406
78,091

8,406
78,091
86,497
15,720
70,777
1998201135 years
Naples ALZ DevelopmentNaplesFL
2,983


2,983

2,983

2,983
CIPCIPCIP
Hampton Manor at 24th RoadOcalaFL
690
8,767

690
8,767
9,457
1,815
7,642
1996201135 years
Hampton Manor at DeerwoodOcalaFL
790
5,605
3,648
983
9,060
10,043
1,499
8,544
2005201135 years
Las PalmasPalm CoastFL
984
30,009

984
30,009
30,993
4,249
26,744
2009201335 years
Princeton Village of Palm CoastPalm CoastFL
1,958
24,525
42
1,958
24,567
26,525
2,578
23,947
2007201535 years
Outlook Pointe at PensacolaPensacolaFL
2,230
2,362
154
2,230
2,516
4,746
790
3,956
1999201135 years
Magnolia HouseQuincyFL
400
5,190

400
5,190
5,590
1,104
4,486
1999201135 years
Outlook Pointe at TallahasseeTallahasseeFL
2,430
17,745
460
2,430
18,205
20,635
3,871
16,764
1999201135 years
Magnolia PlaceTallahasseeFL
640
8,013
81
640
8,094
8,734
1,627
7,107
1999201135 years
Bristol Park of TamaracTamaracFL
3,920
14,130
718
3,920
14,848
18,768
3,023
15,745
2000201135 years
Elmcroft of CarrolwoodTampaFL
5,410
20,944
634
5,410
21,578
26,988
4,692
22,296
2001201135 years
Arbor Terrace of AthensAthensGA
1,767
16,442
439
1,770
16,878
18,648
1,759
16,889
1998201535 years
Arbor Terrace at CascadeAtlantaGA
3,052
9,040
662
3,057
9,697
12,754
1,440
11,314
1999201535 years
Augusta GardensAugustaGA
530
10,262
308
543
10,557
11,100
2,239
8,861
1997201135 years
Benton House of CovingtonCovingtonGA7,594
1,297
11,397
142
1,297
11,539
12,836
1,271
11,565
2009201535 years
Arbor Terrace of DecaturDecaturGA
3,102
19,599
(1,371)1,292
20,038
21,330
2,053
19,277
1990201535 years
Benton House of DouglasvilleDouglasvilleGA
1,697
15,542
78
1,697
15,620
17,317
1,673
15,644
2010201535 years
Elmcroft of MartinezMartinezGA
408
6,764
5
408
6,769
7,177
2,029
5,148
1997200735 years
Benton House of NewnanNewnanGA
1,474
17,487
157
1,474
17,644
19,118
1,839
17,279
2010201535 years
Elmcroft of RoswellRoswellGA
1,867
15,835
24
1,867
15,859
17,726
1,595
16,131
1997201435 years
Benton Village of StockbridgeStockbridgeGA
2,221
21,989
456
2,227
22,439
24,666
2,411
22,255
2008201535 years
Benton House of Sugar HillSugar HillGA
2,173
14,937
101
2,173
15,038
17,211
1,698
15,513
2010201535 years
Mayflower Care HomeNorthfleetUK
4,330
7,519
(983)3,971
6,895
10,866
695
10,171
2012201540 years

 Location Initial Cost to CompanyGross Amount Carried at Close of Period   
Property NameCityState /
Province
EncumbrancesLand and
Improvements
Buildings and
Improvements
Costs
Capitalized
Subsequent
to Acquisition1
Land and
Improvements
Buildings and
Improvements
TotalAccumulated
Depreciation
NBVYear of
Construction
Year
Acquired
Life on
Which
Depreciation
in Income
Statement
is Computed
Bear Canyon EstatesAlbuquerqueNM1,879 36,223 (368)1,879 35,855 37,734 7,664 30,070 1997201335 years
The Woodmark at UptownAlbuquerqueNM2,439 33,276 2,081 2,471 35,325 37,796 7,231 30,565 2000201535 years
Elmcroft of QuintessenceAlbuquerqueNM1,150 26,527 1,195 1,184 27,688 28,872 8,271 20,601 1998201135 years
The AmberleighBuffaloNY3,498 19,097 7,269 3,512 26,352 29,864 9,858 20,006 1988200535 years
Brookdale Battery Park CityNew YorkNY116,100 2,903 186,978 1,490 2,913 188,458 191,371 14,043 177,328 2000201835 years
The Hearth at Castle GardensVestalNY1,830 20,312 2,230 1,885 22,487 24,372 8,251 16,121 1994201135 years
Elmcroft of AsheboroAsheboroNC680 15,370 522 694 15,878 16,572 4,329 12,243 1998201135 years
Arbor Terrace of AshevilleAshevilleNC1,365 15,679 924 1,365 16,603 17,968 3,754 14,214 1998201535 years
Elmcroft of Little AvenueCharlotteNC250 5,077 510 250 5,587 5,837 2,305 3,532 1997200635 years
Elmcroft of Cramer MountainCramertonNC530 18,225 225 553 18,427 18,980 5,049 13,931 1999201135 years
Elmcroft of HarrisburgHarrisburgNC1,660 15,130 711 1,685 15,816 17,501 4,310 13,191 1997201135 years
Elmcroft of Hendersonville (NC)HendersonvilleNC2,210 7,372 336 2,236 7,682 9,918 2,187 7,731 2005201135 years
Elmcroft of HillsboroughHillsboroughNC1,450 19,754 383 1,470 20,117 21,587 5,533 16,054 2005201135 years
Willow GroveMatthewsNC763 27,544 (274)763 27,270 28,033 5,834 22,199 2009201335 years
Elmcroft of NewtonNewtonNC540 14,935 418 544 15,349 15,893 4,188 11,705 2000201135 years
Independence Village of Olde RaleighRaleighNC1,989 18,648 1,989 18,655 20,644 4,843 15,801 1991201235 years
Elmcroft of NorthridgeRaleighNC184 3,592 2,357 207 5,926 6,133 2,113 4,020 1984200635 years
Elmcroft of SalisburySalisburyNC1,580 25,026 394 1,580 25,420 27,000 6,939 20,061 1999201135 years
Elmcroft of ShelbyShelbyNC660 15,471 488 675 15,944 16,619 4,334 12,285 2000201135 years
Elmcroft of Southern PinesSouthern PinesNC1,196 10,766 966 1,210 11,718 12,928 3,674 9,254 1998201035 years
Elmcroft of SouthportSouthportNC1,330 10,356 253 1,349 10,590 11,939 2,984 8,955 2005201135 years
Primrose BismarckBismarckND1,210 9,768 255 1,210 10,023 11,233 3,042 8,191 1994201135 years
Wellington ALF - Minot NDMinotND3,241 9,509 3,241 9,509 12,750 2,745 10,005 2005201535 years
Elmcroft of LimaLimaOH490 3,368 553 495 3,916 4,411 1,623 2,788 1998200635 years
Elmcroft of OntarioMansfieldOH523 7,968 599 524 8,566 9,090 3,482 5,608 1998200635 years
Elmcroft of MedinaMedinaOH661 9,788 706 661 10,494 11,155 4,322 6,833 1999200635 years
Elmcroft of Washington TownshipMiamisburgOH1,235 12,611 743 1,236 13,353 14,589 5,479 9,110 1998200635 years
Elmcroft of Sagamore HillsSagamore HillsOH980 12,604 995 998 13,581 14,579 5,569 9,010 2000200635 years
Elmcroft of LorainVermilionOH500 15,461 1,359 578 16,742 17,320 5,410 11,910 2000201135 years
Gardens at Westlake Senior LivingWestlakeOH2,401 20,640 690 2,413 21,318 23,731 4,874 18,857 1987201535 years
Elmcroft of XeniaXeniaOH653 2,801 1,052 678 3,828 4,506 1,550 2,956 1999200635 years
Arbor House of MustangMustangOK372 3,587 372 3,587 3,959 913 3,046 1999201235 years
Arbor House of NormanNormanOK444 7,525 444 7,525 7,969 1,907 6,062 2000201235 years
Arbor House Reminisce CenterNormanOK438 3,028 438 3,028 3,466 773 2,693 2004201235 years
Arbor House of Midwest CityOklahoma CityOK544 9,133 544 9,133 9,677 2,314 7,363 2004201235 years
Mansion at WaterfordOklahoma CityOK2,077 14,184 2,077 14,184 16,261 3,754 12,507 1999201235 years
Meadowbrook PlaceBaker CityOR1,430 5,311 1,430 5,311 6,741 1,066 5,675 1965201435 years
Edgewood DownsBeavertonOR2,356 15,476 328 2,356 15,804 18,160 3,352 14,808 1978201335 years
Avamere at HillsboroHillsboroOR4,400 8,353 1,413 4,400 9,766 14,166 3,296 10,870 2000201135 years
138


 Location Initial Cost to Company Gross Amount Carried at Close of Period      
Property NameCity
State /
Province
Encumbrances
Land and
Improvements
Buildings and
Improvements
Costs
Capitalized
Subsequent
to Acquisition
Land and
Improvements
Buildings and
Improvements
Total
Accumulated
Depreciation
NBV
Year of
Construction
Year
Acquired
Life on
Which
Depreciation
in Income
Statement
is Computed
Villas of St. James - Breese, ILBreeseIL
671
6,849

671
6,849
7,520
852
6,668
2009201535 years
Villas of Holly Brook - Chatham, ILChathamIL
1,185
8,910

1,185
8,910
10,095
1,140
8,955
2012201535 years
Villas of Holly Brook - Effingham, ILEffinghamIL
508
6,624

508
6,624
7,132
801
6,331
2011201535 years
Villas of Holly Brook - Herrin, ILHerrinIL
2,175
9,605

2,175
9,605
11,780
1,416
10,364
2012201535 years
Villas of Holly Brook - Marshall, ILMarshallIL
1,461
4,881

1,461
4,881
6,342
837
5,505
2012201535 years
Villas of Holly Brook - Newton, ILNewtonIL
458
4,590

458
4,590
5,048
616
4,432
2011201535 years
Rochester Senior Living at WyndcrestRochesterIL
570
6,536
108
570
6,644
7,214
767
6,447
2005201535 years
Villas of Holly Brook, Shelbyville, ILShelbyvilleIL
2,292
3,351

2,292
3,351
5,643
921
4,722
2011201535 years
Elmcroft of MuncieMuncieIN
244
11,218
4
244
11,222
11,466
3,366
8,100
1998200735 years
Wood RidgeSouth BendIN
590
4,850
(35)590
4,815
5,405
1,059
4,346
1990201135 years
Maples Care HomeBexleyheathUK
5,042
7,525
(1,043)4,624
6,900
11,524
689
10,835
2007201540 years
Barty House Nursing HomeMaidstoneUK
3,769
3,089
(569)3,456
2,833
6,289
407
5,882
2013201540 years
Tunbridge Wells Care CentreTunbridge WellsUK
4,323
5,869
(846)3,964
5,382
9,346
593
8,753
2010201540 years
Elmcroft of Florence (KY)FlorenceKY
1,535
21,826
10
1,535
21,836
23,371
2,182
21,189
2010201435 years
Hartland HillsLexingtonKY
1,468
23,929

1,468
23,929
25,397
3,401
21,996
2001201335 years
Elmcroft of Mount WashingtonMount WashingtonKY
758
12,048
8
758
12,056
12,814
1,204
11,610
2005201435 years
Heathlands Care HomeChingfordUK
5,398
7,967
(1,109)4,950
7,306
12,256
744
11,512
1980201540 years
Heritage WoodsAgawamMA
1,249
4,625

1,249
4,625
5,874
2,404
3,470
1997200430 years
Devonshire EstatesLenoxMA
1,832
31,124

1,832
31,124
32,956
4,423
28,533
1998201335 years
Outlook Pointe at HagerstownHagerstownMD
2,010
1,293
273
2,010
1,566
3,576
539
3,037
1999201135 years
Clover HealthcareAuburnME
1,400
26,895
876
1,400
27,771
29,171
6,014
23,157
1982201135 years
Gorham HouseGorhamME
1,360
33,147
1,472
1,527
34,452
35,979
6,825
29,154
1990201135 years
Kittery EstatesKitteryME
1,531
30,811

1,531
30,811
32,342
4,373
27,969
2009201335 years
Woods at CancoPortlandME
1,441
45,578

1,441
45,578
47,019
6,452
40,567
2000201335 years
Sentry Inn at York HarborYork HarborME
3,490
19,869

3,490
19,869
23,359
4,061
19,298
2000201135 years
Elmcroft of DownriverBrownstown Charter TownshipMI
320
32,652
437
371
33,038
33,409
6,667
26,742
2000201135 years
Independence Village of East LansingEast LansingMI
1,956
18,122
398
1,956
18,520
20,476
3,128
17,348
1989201235 years
Elmcroft of KentwoodKentwoodMI
510
13,976
(3,503)481
10,502
10,983
3,361
7,622
2001201135 years
Primrose AustinAustinMN
2,540
11,707
443
2,540
12,150
14,690
2,369
12,321
2002201135 years
Primrose DuluthDuluthMN
6,190
8,296
257
6,245
8,498
14,743
1,902
12,841
2003201135 years
Primrose MankatoMankatoMN
1,860
8,920
352
1,860
9,272
11,132
1,978
9,154
1999201135 years
Lodge at White BearWhite Bear LakeMN
732
24,999

732
24,999
25,731
3,538
22,193
2002201335 years
Assisted Living at the Meadowlands - O'Fallon, MOO'FallonMO
2,326
14,158

2,326
14,158
16,484
1,760
14,724
1999201535 years
Canyon Creek Inn Memory CareBillingsMT
420
11,217
7
420
11,224
11,644
2,212
9,432
2011201135 years
Spring Creek Inn Alzheimer's CommunityBozemanMT
1,345
16,877

1,345
16,877
18,222
470
17,752
2010201735 years
The Springs at MissoulaMissoulaMT16,500
1,975
34,390
1,375
1,975
35,765
37,740
6,046
31,694
2004201235 years
Carillon ALF of AsheboroAsheboroNC
680
15,370

680
15,370
16,050
3,109
12,941
1998201135 years
Arbor Terrace of AshevilleAshevilleNC
1,365
15,679
532
1,365
16,211
17,576
1,753
15,823
1998201535 years

 Location Initial Cost to CompanyGross Amount Carried at Close of Period   
Property NameCityState /
Province
EncumbrancesLand and
Improvements
Buildings and
Improvements
Costs
Capitalized
Subsequent
to Acquisition1
Land and
Improvements
Buildings and
Improvements
TotalAccumulated
Depreciation
NBVYear of
Construction
Year
Acquired
Life on
Which
Depreciation
in Income
Statement
is Computed
The Springs at TanasbourneHillsboroOR30,947 4,689 55,035 4,689 55,035 59,724 15,653 44,071 2009201335 years
The Arbor at Avamere CourtKeizerOR922 6,460 110 1,135 6,357 7,492 1,549 5,943 2012201435 years
The StaffordLake OswegoOR1,800 16,122 884 1,806 17,000 18,806 5,272 13,534 2008201135 years
The Springs at Clackamas WoodsMilwaukieOR13,965 1,264 22,429 5,244 1,381 27,556 28,937 6,579 22,358 1999201235 years
Clackamas Woods Assisted LivingMilwaukieOR7,519 681 12,077 681 12,077 12,758 3,181 9,577 1999201235 years
Avamere at NewbergNewbergOR1,320 4,664 641 1,342 5,283 6,625 2,007 4,618 1999201135 years
Avamere Living at Berry ParkOregon CityOR1,910 4,249 2,316 1,910 6,565 8,475 2,493 5,982 1972201135 years
McLoughlin Place Senior LivingOregon CityOR2,418 26,819 2,418 26,819 29,237 5,321 23,916 1997201435 years
Avamere at BethanyPortlandOR3,150 16,740 257 3,150 16,997 20,147 5,236 14,911 2002201135 years
Avamere at SandySandyOR1,000 7,309 345 1,000 7,654 8,654 2,580 6,074 1999201135 years
Suzanne Elise ALFSeasideOR1,940 4,027 631 1,945 4,653 6,598 1,695 4,903 1998201135 years
Necanicum VillageSeasideOR2,212 7,311 273 2,212 7,584 9,796 1,668 8,128 2001201535 years
Avamere at SherwoodSherwoodOR1,010 7,051 1,454 1,010 8,505 9,515 2,518 6,997 2000201135 years
Chateau GardensSpringfieldOR1,550 4,197 1,550 4,197 5,747 1,247 4,500 1991201135 years
Avamere at St HelensSt. HelensOR1,410 10,496 502 1,410 10,998 12,408 3,580 8,828 2000201135 years
Flagstone Senior LivingThe DallesOR1,631 17,786 1,631 17,786 19,417 3,523 15,894 1991201435 years
Elmcroft of Allison ParkAllison ParkPA1,171 5,686 565 1,171 6,251 7,422 2,509 4,913 1986200635 years
Elmcroft of ChippewaBeaver FallsPA1,394 8,586 658 1,452 9,186 10,638 3,713 6,925 1998200635 years
Elmcroft of BerwickBerwickPA111 6,741 481 111 7,222 7,333 2,913 4,420 1998200635 years
Elmcroft of BridgevilleBridgevillePA1,660 12,624 1,157 1,660 13,781 15,441 3,888 11,553 1999201135 years
Elmcroft of DillsburgDillsburgPA432 7,797 1,152 432 8,949 9,381 3,445 5,936 1998200635 years
Elmcroft of AltoonaDuncansvillePA331 4,729 614 331 5,343 5,674 2,169 3,505 1997200635 years
Elmcroft of LebanonLebanonPA240 7,336 555 249 7,882 8,131 3,246 4,885 1999200635 years
Elmcroft of LewisburgLewisburgPA232 5,666 578 238 6,238 6,476 2,544 3,932 1999200635 years
Lehigh CommonsMacungiePA420 4,406 450 420 4,856 5,276 3,034 2,242 1997200430 years
Elmcroft of LoyalsockMontoursvillePA413 3,412 564 429 3,960 4,389 1,639 2,750 1999200635 years
Highgate at Paoli PointePaoliPA1,151 9,079 1,151 9,079 10,230 5,227 5,003 1997200430 years
Elmcroft of Mid ValleyPeckvillePA619 11,662 320 619 11,982 12,601 2,412 10,189 1998201435 years
Sanatoga CourtPottstownPA360 3,233 360 3,233 3,593 1,908 1,685 1997200430 years
Berkshire CommonsReadingPA470 4,301 470 4,301 4,771 2,536 2,235 1997200430 years
Mifflin CourtReadingPA689 4,265 351 689 4,616 5,305 2,485 2,820 1997200435 years
Elmcroft of ReadingReadingPA638 4,942 573 659 5,494 6,153 2,216 3,937 1998200635 years
Elmcroft of ReedsvilleReedsvillePA189 5,170 513 189 5,683 5,872 2,324 3,548 1998200635 years
Elmcroft of ShippensburgShippensburgPA203 7,634 696 217 8,316 8,533 3,343 5,190 1999200635 years
Elmcroft of State CollegeState CollegePA320 7,407 470 325 7,872 8,197 3,211 4,986 1997200635 years
Elmcroft of YorkYorkPA1,260 6,923 460 1,298 7,345 8,643 2,115 6,528 1999201135 years
The Garden HouseAndersonSC969 15,613 326 974 15,934 16,908 3,493 13,415 2000201535 years
Forest PinesColumbiaSC1,058 27,471 (392)1,058 27,079 28,137 5,797 22,340 1998201335 years
Elmcroft of Florence SCFlorenceSC108 7,620 1,295 122 8,901 9,023 3,756 5,267 1998200635 years
139


 Location Initial Cost to Company Gross Amount Carried at Close of Period      
Property NameCity
State /
Province
Encumbrances
Land and
Improvements
Buildings and
Improvements
Costs
Capitalized
Subsequent
to Acquisition
Land and
Improvements
Buildings and
Improvements
Total
Accumulated
Depreciation
NBV
Year of
Construction
Year
Acquired
Life on
Which
Depreciation
in Income
Statement
is Computed
Elmcroft of Little AvenueCharlotteNC
250
5,077
7
250
5,084
5,334
1,620
3,714
1997200635 years
Carillon ALF of Cramer MountainCramertonNC
530
18,225

530
18,225
18,755
3,710
15,045
1999201135 years
Carillon ALF of HarrisburgHarrisburgNC
1,660
15,130

1,660
15,130
16,790
3,070
13,720
1997201135 years
Carillon ALF of HendersonvilleHendersonvilleNC
2,210
7,372

2,210
7,372
9,582
1,669
7,913
2005201135 years
Carillon ALF of HillsboroughHillsboroughNC
1,450
19,754

1,450
19,754
21,204
3,962
17,242
2005201135 years
Willow GroveMatthewsNC
763
27,544

763
27,544
28,307
3,897
24,410
2009201335 years
Carillon ALF of NewtonNewtonNC
540
14,935

540
14,935
15,475
3,021
12,454
2000201135 years
Independence Village of Olde RaleighRaleighNC
1,989
18,648

1,989
18,648
20,637
3,201
17,436
1991201235 years
Elmcroft of NorthridgeRaleighNC
184
3,592
16
184
3,608
3,792
1,147
2,645
1984200635 years
Carillon ALF of SalisburySalisburyNC
1,580
25,026

1,580
25,026
26,606
4,973
21,633
1999201135 years
Carillon ALF of ShelbyShelbyNC
660
15,471

660
15,471
16,131
3,140
12,991
2000201135 years
Elmcroft of Southern PinesSouthern PinesNC
1,196
10,766
14
1,196
10,780
11,976
2,385
9,591
1998201035 years
Carillon ALF of SouthportSouthportNC
1,330
10,356

1,330
10,356
11,686
2,223
9,463
2005201135 years
Primrose BismarckBismarckND
1,210
9,768
255
1,210
10,023
11,233
2,041
9,192
1994201135 years
Wellington ALF - Minot NDMinotND
3,241
9,509

3,241
9,509
12,750
1,462
11,288
2005201535 years
Crown PointeOmahaNE
1,316
11,950
1,700
1,316
13,650
14,966
4,318
10,648
1985200535 years
Birch HeightsDerryNH
1,413
30,267

1,413
30,267
31,680
4,294
27,386
2009201335 years
Bear Canyon EstatesAlbuquerqueNM
1,879
36,223

1,879
36,223
38,102
5,142
32,960
1997201335 years
The Woodmark at UptownAlbuquerqueNM
2,439
33,276
451
2,451
33,715
36,166
3,404
32,762
2000201535 years
Elmcroft of QuintessenceAlbuquerqueNM
1,150
26,527
426
1,165
26,938
28,103
5,483
22,620
1998201135 years
Prestige Assisted Living at Mira LomaHendersonNV
1,279
12,558

1,279
12,558
13,837
739
13,098
1998201635 years
The AmberleighBuffaloNY
3,498
19,097
5,836
3,498
24,933
28,431
7,058
21,373
1988200535 years
The Hearth at Castle GardensVestalNY
1,830
20,312
2,230
1,885
22,487
24,372
5,685
18,687
1994201135 years
Elmcroft of LimaLimaOH
490
3,368
11
490
3,379
3,869
1,075
2,794
1998200635 years
Elmcroft of OntarioMansfieldOH
523
7,968
12
523
7,980
8,503
2,543
5,960
1998200635 years
Elmcroft of MedinaMedinaOH
661
9,788
7
661
9,795
10,456
3,123
7,333
1999200635 years
Elmcroft of Washington TownshipMiamisburgOH
1,235
12,611
6
1,235
12,617
13,852
4,024
9,828
1998200635 years
Elmcroft of Sagamore HillsSagamore HillsOH
980
12,604
29
980
12,633
13,613
4,023
9,590
2000200635 years
Elmcroft of LorainVermilionOH
500
15,461
532
557
15,936
16,493
3,562
12,931
2000201135 years
Gardens at Westlake Senior LivingWestlakeOH
2,401
20,640
128
2,401
20,768
23,169
2,352
20,817
1987201535 years
Elmcroft of XeniaXeniaOH
653
2,801
1
653
2,802
3,455
894
2,561
1999200635 years
Arbor House of MustangMustangOK
372
3,587

372
3,587
3,959
600
3,359
1999201235 years
Arbor House of NormanNormanOK
444
7,525

444
7,525
7,969
1,252
6,717
2000201235 years
Arbor House Reminisce CenterNormanOK
438
3,028

438
3,028
3,466
509
2,957
2004201235 years
Arbor House of Midwest CityOklahoma CityOK
544
9,133

544
9,133
9,677
1,519
8,158
2004201235 years
Mansion at WaterfordOklahoma CityOK
2,077
14,184

2,077
14,184
16,261
2,531
13,730
1999201235 years
Meadowbrook PlaceBaker CityOR
1,430
5,311

1,430
5,311
6,741
566
6,175
1965201435 years
Edgewood DownsBeavertonOR
2,356
15,476

2,356
15,476
17,832
2,227
15,605
1978201335 years
Princeton Village Assisted LivingClackamasOR2,691
1,126
10,283
56
1,126
10,339
11,465
1,137
10,328
1999201535 years

 Location Initial Cost to CompanyGross Amount Carried at Close of Period   
Property NameCityState /
Province
EncumbrancesLand and
Improvements
Buildings and
Improvements
Costs
Capitalized
Subsequent
to Acquisition1
Land and
Improvements
Buildings and
Improvements
TotalAccumulated
Depreciation
NBVYear of
Construction
Year
Acquired
Life on
Which
Depreciation
in Income
Statement
is Computed
Carolina Gardens at Garden CityMurrells InletSC1,095 8,618 91 1,095 8,709 9,804 328 9,476 1999201935 years
Carolina Gardens at Rock HillRock HillSC790 9,568 109 790 9,677 10,467 359 10,108 2008201935 years
Primrose AberdeenAberdeenSD850 659 235 850 894 1,744 538 1,206 1991201135 years
Primrose PlaceAberdeenSD310 3,242 53 310 3,295 3,605 1,017 2,588 2000201135 years
Primrose Rapid CityRapid CitySD860 8,722 88 860 8,810 9,670 2,729 6,941 1997201135 years
Primrose Sioux FallsSioux FallsSD2,180 12,936 315 2,180 13,251 15,431 4,172 11,259 2002201135 years
Elmcroft of BristolBristolTN470 16,006 753 480 16,749 17,229 4,634 12,595 1999201135 years
Elmcroft of Hamilton PlaceChattanoogaTN87 4,248 640 87 4,888 4,975 2,008 2,967 1998200635 years
Elmcroft of ShallowfordChattanoogaTN580 7,568 1,554 636 9,066 9,702 3,203 6,499 1999201135 years
Elmcroft of HendersonvilleHendersonvilleTN600 5,304 900 600 6,204 6,804 1,335 5,469 1999201435 years
Regency HouseHixsonTN140 6,611 140 6,611 6,751 1,956 4,795 2000201135 years
Elmcroft of JacksonJacksonTN768 16,840 186 797 16,997 17,794 3,696 14,098 1998201435 years
Elmcroft of Johnson CityJohnson CityTN590 10,043 472 610 10,495 11,105 2,960 8,145 1999201135 years
Elmcroft of KingsportKingsportTN22 7,815 845 22 8,660 8,682 3,477 5,205 2000200635 years
Arbor Terrace of KnoxvilleKnoxvilleTN590 15,862 1,163 590 17,025 17,615 3,925 13,690 1997201535 years
Elmcroft of West KnoxvilleKnoxvilleTN439 10,697 1,077 464 11,749 12,213 4,832 7,381 2000200635 years
Elmcroft of HallsKnoxvilleTN387 4,948 665 387 5,613 6,000 1,207 4,793 1998201435 years
Elmcroft of LebanonLebanonTN180 7,086 1,371 200 8,437 8,637 3,530 5,107 2000200635 years
Elmcroft of BartlettMemphisTN570 25,552 (8,580)594 16,948 17,542 7,783 9,759 1999201135 years
The GlenmaryMemphisTN510 5,860 3,124 510 8,984 9,494 3,373 6,121 1964201135 years
Elmcroft of MurfreesboroMurfreesboroTN940 8,030 481 940 8,511 9,451 2,398 7,053 1999201135 years
Elmcroft of BrentwoodNashvilleTN960 22,020 2,102 977 24,105 25,082 7,312 17,770 1998201135 years
Elmcroft of ArlingtonArlingtonTX2,650 14,060 1,425 2,660 15,475 18,135 5,004 13,131 1998201135 years
Meadowbrook ALZArlingtonTX755 4,677 940 755 5,617 6,372 1,414 4,958 2012201235 years
Elmcroft of AustinAustinTX2,770 25,820 1,482 2,776 27,296 30,072 8,270 21,802 2000201135 years
Elmcroft of BedfordBedfordTX770 19,691 1,736 776 21,421 22,197 6,689 15,508 1999201135 years
Highland EstatesCedar ParkTX1,679 28,943 (270)1,679 28,673 30,352 6,137 24,215 2009201335 years
Elmcroft of RivershireConroeTX860 32,671 1,409 860 34,080 34,940 10,197 24,743 1997201135 years
Flower MoundFlower MoundTX900 5,512 900 5,512 6,412 1,664 4,748 1995201135 years
Bridgewater Memory CareGranburyTX390 8,186 390 8,186 8,576 2,072 6,504 2007201235 years
Copperfield EstatesHoustonTX1,216 21,135 (135)1,216 21,000 22,216 4,480 17,736 2009201335 years
Elmcroft of BraeswoodHoustonTX3,970 15,919 (4,816)3,974 11,099 15,073 5,492 9,581 1999201135 years
Elmcroft of Cy-FairHoustonTX1,580 21,801 1,449 1,593 23,237 24,830 7,054 17,776 1998201135 years
Whitley PlaceKellerTX5,100 773 5,873 5,873 2,127 3,746 1998200835 years
Elmcroft of Lake JacksonLake JacksonTX710 14,765 1,346 712 16,109 16,821 5,089 11,732 1998201135 years
Polo Park EstatesMidlandTX765 29,447 (292)765 29,155 29,920 6,238 23,682 1996201335 years
Arbor Hills Memory Care CommunityPlanoTX1,014 5,719 1,014 5,719 6,733 1,373 5,360 2013201335 years
Lakeshore Assisted Living and Memory CareRockwallTX1,537 12,883 1,537 12,883 14,420 3,282 11,138 2009201235 years
140
 Location Initial Cost to Company Gross Amount Carried at Close of Period      
Property NameCity
State /
Province
Encumbrances
Land and
Improvements
Buildings and
Improvements
Costs
Capitalized
Subsequent
to Acquisition
Land and
Improvements
Buildings and
Improvements
Total
Accumulated
Depreciation
NBV
Year of
Construction
Year
Acquired
Life on
Which
Depreciation
in Income
Statement
is Computed
Bayside Terrace Assisted LivingCoos BayOR
498
2,795
423
498
3,218
3,716
317
3,399
2006201535 years
Ocean Ridge Assisted LivingCoos BayOR
2,681
10,941
(94)2,681
10,847
13,528
1,414
12,114
2006201535 years
Avamere at HillsboroHillsboroOR
4,400
8,353
1,209
4,400
9,562
13,962
2,232
11,730
2000201135 years
The Springs at TanasbourneHillsboroOR33,282
4,689
55,035

4,689
55,035
59,724
9,933
49,791
2009201335 years
The Arbor at Avamere CourtKeizerOR
922
6,460
108
1,135
6,355
7,490
808
6,682
2012201435 years
Pelican PointeKlamath FallsOR11,614
943
26,237
113
943
26,350
27,293
2,691
24,602
2011201535 years
The StaffordLake OswegoOR
1,800
16,122
644
1,806
16,760
18,566
3,542
15,024
2008201135 years
The Springs at Clackamas WoodsMilwaukieOR14,755
1,264
22,429

1,264
22,429
23,693
3,944
19,749
1999201235 years
Clackamas Woods Assisted LivingMilwaukieOR7,945
681
12,077

681
12,077
12,758
2,123
10,635
1999201235 years
Pheasant Pointe Assisted LivingMolallaOR
904
7,433
(107)904
7,326
8,230
701
7,529
1998201535 years
Avamere at NewbergNewbergOR
1,320
4,664
588
1,342
5,230
6,572
1,323
5,249
1999201135 years
Avamere Living at Berry ParkOregon CityOR
1,910
4,249
2,298
1,910
6,547
8,457
1,666
6,791
1972201135 years
McLoughlin Place Senior LivingOregon CityOR
2,418
26,819

2,418
26,819
29,237
2,822
26,415
1997201435 years
Avamere at BethanyPortlandOR
3,150
16,740
227
3,150
16,967
20,117
3,605
16,512
2002201135 years
Cedar Village Assisted LivingSalemOR
868
12,652

868
12,652
13,520
1,115
12,405
1999201535 years
Redwood Heights Assisted LivingSalemOR
1,513
16,774
(175)1,513
16,599
18,112
1,513
16,599
1999201535 years
Avamere at SandySandyOR
1,000
7,309
276
1,000
7,585
8,585
1,760
6,825
1999201135 years
Suzanne Elise ALFSeasideOR
1,940
4,027
66
1,940
4,093
6,033
1,160
4,873
1998201135 years
Necanicum VillageSeasideOR
2,212
7,311
52
2,212
7,363
9,575
767
8,808
2001201535 years
Avamere at SherwoodSherwoodOR
1,010
7,051
259
1,010
7,310
8,320
1,707
6,613
2000201135 years
Chateau GardensSpringfieldOR
1,550
4,197

1,550
4,197
5,747
875
4,872
1991201135 years
Avamere at St HelensSt. HelensOR
1,410
10,496
488
1,410
10,984
12,394
2,428
9,966
2000201135 years
Flagstone Senior LivingThe DallesOR
1,631
17,786

1,631
17,786
19,417
1,867
17,550
1991201435 years
Elmcroft of Allison ParkAllison ParkPA
1,171
5,686
8
1,171
5,694
6,865
1,814
5,051
1986200635 years
Elmcroft of ChippewaBeaver FallsPA
1,394
8,586
5
1,394
8,591
9,985
2,740
7,245
1998200635 years
Elmcroft of BerwickBerwickPA
111
6,741
4
111
6,745
6,856
2,151
4,705
1998200635 years
Outlook Pointe at LakemontBridgevillePA
1,660
12,624
205
1,660
12,829
14,489
2,787
11,702
1999201135 years
Elmcroft of DillsburgDillsburgPA
432
7,797

432
7,797
8,229
2,488
5,741
1998200635 years
Elmcroft of AltoonaDuncansvillePA
331
4,729
4
331
4,733
5,064
1,509
3,555
1997200635 years
Elmcroft of LebanonLebanonPA
240
7,336
4
240
7,340
7,580
2,341
5,239
1999200635 years
Elmcroft of LewisburgLewisburgPA
232
5,666

232
5,666
5,898
1,808
4,090
1999200635 years
Lehigh CommonsMacungiePA
420
4,406
450
420
4,856
5,276
2,504
2,772
1997200430 years
Elmcroft of LoyalsockMontoursvillePA
413
3,412

413
3,412
3,825
1,089
2,736
1999200635 years
Highgate at Paoli PointePaoliPA
1,151
9,079

1,151
9,079
10,230
4,344
5,886
1997200430 years
Elmcroft of Mid ValleyPeckvillePA
619
11,662
3
619
11,665
12,284
1,163
11,121
1998201435 years
Sanatoga CourtPottstownPA
360
3,233

360
3,233
3,593
1,604
1,989
1997200430 years
Berkshire CommonsReadingPA
470
4,301

470
4,301
4,771
2,132
2,639
1997200430 years
Mifflin CourtReadingPA
689
4,265
351
689
4,616
5,305
2,048
3,257
1997200435 years
Elmcroft of ReadingReadingPA
638
4,942
3
638
4,945
5,583
1,577
4,006
1998200635 years



 Location Initial Cost to CompanyGross Amount Carried at Close of Period   
Property NameCityState /
Province
EncumbrancesLand and
Improvements
Buildings and
Improvements
Costs
Capitalized
Subsequent
to Acquisition1
Land and
Improvements
Buildings and
Improvements
TotalAccumulated
Depreciation
NBVYear of
Construction
Year
Acquired
Life on
Which
Depreciation
in Income
Statement
is Computed
Elmcroft of WindcrestSan AntonioTX920 13,011 (164)932 12,835 13,767 4,673 9,094 1999201135 years
Paradise SpringsSpringTX1,488 24,556 (60)1,490 24,494 25,984 5,204 20,780 2008201335 years
Canyon Creek Memory CareTempleTX473 6,750 473 6,750 7,223 1,712 5,511 2008201235 years
Elmcroft of CottonwoodTempleTX630 17,515 1,210 630 18,725 19,355 5,792 13,563 1997201135 years
Elmcroft of MainlandTexas CityTX520 14,849 1,466 574 16,261 16,835 5,186 11,649 1996201135 years
Elmcroft of VictoriaVictoriaTX440 13,040 1,378 448 14,410 14,858 4,556 10,302 1997201135 years
Windsor Court Senior LivingWeatherfordTX233 3,347 233 3,347 3,580 849 2,731 1994201235 years
Elmcroft of WhartonWhartonTX320 13,799 1,252 352 15,019 15,371 4,890 10,481 1996201135 years
Mountain RidgeSouth OgdenUT1,243 24,659 99 1,243 24,758 26,001 4,857 21,144 2001201435 years
Elmcroft of ChesterfieldRichmondVA829 6,534 837 836 7,364 8,200 2,958 5,242 1999200635 years
Pheasant RidgeRoanokeVA1,813 9,027 1,813 9,027 10,840 2,390 8,450 1999201235 years
Cascade Valley Senior LivingArlingtonWA1,413 6,294 1,413 6,294 7,707 1,243 6,464 1995201435 years
Madison HouseKirklandWA4,291 26,787 1,391 4,414 28,055 32,469 3,680 28,789 1978201735 years
Delaware PlazaLongviewWA3,932 620 5,116 136 815 5,057 5,872 815 5,057 1972201735 years
Canterbury GardensLongviewWA5,351 444 13,715 157 444 13,872 14,316 1,791 12,525 1998201735 years
Canterbury InnLongviewWA14,568 1,462 34,664 837 1,462 35,501 36,963 4,568 32,395 1989201735 years
Canterbury ParkLongviewWA969 30,109 969 30,109 31,078 3,837 27,241 2000201735 years
Bishop Place Senior LivingPullmanWA1,780 33,608 1,780 33,608 35,388 6,539 28,849 1998201435 years
Willow GardensPuyallupWA1,959 35,492 (285)1,980 35,186 37,166 7,519 29,647 1996201335 years
Cascade InnVancouverWA12,378 3,201 19,024 2,321 3,527 21,019 24,546 3,329 21,217 1979201735 years
The Hampton & Ashley InnVancouverWA1,855 21,047 1,855 21,047 22,902 2,670 20,232 1992201735 years
The Hampton at Salmon CreekVancouverWA11,450 1,256 21,686 1,256 21,686 22,942 2,569 20,373 2013201735 years
Elmcroft of Teays ValleyHurricaneWV1,950 14,489 736 2,041 15,134 17,175 4,219 12,956 1999201135 years
Elmcroft of MartinsburgMartinsburgWV248 8,320 911 253 9,226 9,479 3,686 5,793 1999200635 years
Matthews of Appleton IAppletonWI130 1,834 (1,035)130 799 929 567 362 1996201135 years
Matthews of Appleton IIAppletonWI140 2,016 (1,085)140 931 1,071 709 362 1997201135 years
Hunters RidgeBeaver DamWI260 2,380 260 2,380 2,640 739 1,901 1998201135 years
Azura Memory Care of BeloitBeloitWI150 4,356 427 191 4,742 4,933 1,344 3,589 1990201135 years
Azura Memory Care of ClintonClintonWI290 4,390 290 4,390 4,680 1,276 3,404 1991201135 years
CreeksideCudahyWI760 1,693 760 1,693 2,453 563 1,890 2001201135 years
Azura Memory Care of Eau ClaireEau ClaireWI210 6,259 210 6,259 6,469 1,792 4,677 1996201135 years
Azura Memory Care of Eau Claire IIEau ClaireWI1,188 6,654 68 1,188 6,722 7,910 542 7,368 2019201935 years
Chapel ValleyFitchburgWI450 2,372 450 2,372 2,822 747 2,075 1998201135 years
Matthews of Milwaukee IIFox PointWI1,810 943 (1,444)942 367 1,309 440 869 1999201135 years
Laurel OaksGlendaleWI2,390 43,587 5,130 2,510 48,597 51,107 14,787 36,320 1988201135 years
Layton TerraceGreenfieldWI3,490 39,201 566 3,480 39,777 43,257 11,809 31,448 1999201135 years
Matthews of HartlandHartlandWI640 1,663 (768)652 883 1,535 665 870 1985201135 years
Matthews of HoriconHoriconWI340 3,327 (1,235)345 2,087 2,432 1,127 1,305 2002201135 years
JeffersonJeffersonWI330 2,384 330 2,384 2,714 741 1,973 1997201135 years
141


 Location Initial Cost to Company Gross Amount Carried at Close of Period      
Property NameCity
State /
Province
Encumbrances
Land and
Improvements
Buildings and
Improvements
Costs
Capitalized
Subsequent
to Acquisition
Land and
Improvements
Buildings and
Improvements
Total
Accumulated
Depreciation
NBV
Year of
Construction
Year
Acquired
Life on
Which
Depreciation
in Income
Statement
is Computed
Elmcroft of ReedsvilleReedsvillePA
189
5,170
8
189
5,178
5,367
1,650
3,717
1998200635 years
Elmcroft of SaxonburgSaxonburgPA
770
5,949
17
770
5,966
6,736
1,899
4,837
1994200635 years
Elmcroft of ShippensburgShippensburgPA
203
7,634

203
7,634
7,837
2,436
5,401
1999200635 years
Elmcroft of State CollegeState CollegePA
320
7,407
6
320
7,413
7,733
2,364
5,369
1997200635 years
Outlook Pointe at YorkYorkPA
1,260
6,923
216
1,260
7,139
8,399
1,523
6,876
1999201135 years
The Garden HouseAndersonSC7,566
969
15,613
85
969
15,698
16,667
1,705
14,962
2000201535 years
Forest PinesColumbiaSC
1,058
27,471

1,058
27,471
28,529
3,893
24,636
1998201335 years
Elmcroft of Florence SCFlorenceSC
108
7,620
230
108
7,850
7,958
2,441
5,517
1998200635 years
Primrose AberdeenAberdeenSD
850
659
235
850
894
1,744
339
1,405
1991201135 years
Primrose PlaceAberdeenSD
310
3,242
53
310
3,295
3,605
701
2,904
2000201135 years
Primrose Rapid CityRapid CitySD
860
8,722
88
860
8,810
9,670
1,880
7,790
1997201135 years
Primrose Sioux FallsSioux FallsSD
2,180
12,936
315
2,180
13,251
15,431
2,848
12,583
2002201135 years
Ashridge CourtBexhill-on-SeaUK
2,274
4,791
(587)2,085
4,393
6,478
506
5,972
2010201540 years
Inglewood Nursing HomeEastbourneUK
1,908
3,021
(409)1,750
2,770
4,520
368
4,152
2010201540 years
Pentlow Nursing HomeEastbourneUK
1,964
2,462
(367)1,801
2,258
4,059
318
3,741
2007201540 years
Outlook Pointe of BristolBristolTN
470
16,006
315
470
16,321
16,791
3,222
13,569
1999201135 years
Elmcroft of Hamilton PlaceChattanoogaTN
87
4,248
9
87
4,257
4,344
1,356
2,988
1998200635 years
Elmcroft of ShallowfordChattanoogaTN
580
7,568
523
582
8,089
8,671
2,047
6,624
1999201135 years
Elmcroft of HendersonvilleHendersonvilleTN
600
5,304
52
600
5,356
5,956
536
5,420
1999201435 years
Regency HouseHixsonTN
140
6,611

140
6,611
6,751
1,379
5,372
2000201135 years
Elmcroft of JacksonJacksonTN
768
16,840
8
768
16,848
17,616
1,679
15,937
1998201435 years
Outlook Pointe at Johnson CityJohnson CityTN
590
10,043
400
590
10,443
11,033
2,075
8,958
1999201135 years
Elmcroft of KingsportKingsportTN
22
7,815
7
22
7,822
7,844
2,494
5,350
2000200635 years
Arbor Terrace of KnoxvilleKnoxvilleTN
590
15,862
533
590
16,395
16,985
1,778
15,207
1997201535 years
Elmcroft of HallsKnoxvilleTN
387
4,948
10
387
4,958
5,345
496
4,849
1998201435 years
Elmcroft of West KnoxvilleKnoxvilleTN
439
10,697
26
439
10,723
11,162
3,414
7,748
2000200635 years
Elmcroft of LebanonLebanonTN
180
7,086
391
180
7,477
7,657
2,277
5,380
2000200635 years
Elmcroft of BartlettMemphisTN
570
25,552
377
570
25,929
26,499
5,302
21,197
1999201135 years
Kennington PlaceMemphisTN
1,820
4,748
815
1,820
5,563
7,383
1,895
5,488
1989201135 years
The GlenmaryMemphisTN
510
5,860
477
510
6,337
6,847
1,692
5,155
1964201135 years
Outlook Pointe at MurfreesboroMurfreesboroTN
940
8,030
316
940
8,346
9,286
1,724
7,562
1999201135 years
Elmcroft of BrentwoodNashvilleTN
960
22,020
654
960
22,674
23,634
4,862
18,772
1998201135 years
Elmcroft of ArlingtonArlingtonTX
2,650
14,060
539
2,650
14,599
17,249
3,304
13,945
1998201135 years
Meadowbrook ALZArlingtonTX
755
4,677
940
755
5,617
6,372
922
5,450
2012201235 years
Elmcroft of AustinAustinTX
2,770
25,820
610
2,770
26,430
29,200
5,536
23,664
2000201135 years
Elmcroft of BedfordBedfordTX
770
19,691
699
770
20,390
21,160
4,351
16,809
1999201135 years
Highland EstatesCedar ParkTX
1,679
28,943

1,679
28,943
30,622
4,112
26,510
2009201335 years
Elmcroft of RivershireConroeTX
860
32,671
714
860
33,385
34,245
6,892
27,353
1997201135 years
Flower MoundFlower MoundTX
900
5,512

900
5,512
6,412
1,170
5,242
1995201135 years

 Location Initial Cost to CompanyGross Amount Carried at Close of Period   
Property NameCityState /
Province
EncumbrancesLand and
Improvements
Buildings and
Improvements
Costs
Capitalized
Subsequent
to Acquisition1
Land and
Improvements
Buildings and
Improvements
TotalAccumulated
Depreciation
NBVYear of
Construction
Year
Acquired
Life on
Which
Depreciation
in Income
Statement
is Computed
Azura Memory Care of KenoshaKenoshaWI— 710 3,254 3,765 1,165 6,564 7,729 1,951 5,778 1996201135 years
Azura Memory Care of ManitowocManitowocWI140 1,520 140 1,520 1,660 465 1,195 1997201135 years
The ArboretumMenomonee FallsWI5,640 49,083 2,158 5,640 51,241 56,881 15,956 40,925 1989201135 years
Matthews of Milwaukee IMilwaukeeWI1,800 935 (1,407)927 401 1,328 458 870 1999201135 years
Hart Park SquareMilwaukeeWI1,900 21,628 69 1,900 21,697 23,597 6,395 17,202 2005201135 years
Azura Memory Care of MonroeMonroeWI490 4,964 490 4,964 5,454 1,455 3,999 1990201135 years
Matthews of Neenah INeenahWI710 1,157 (597)713 557 1,270 487 783 2006201135 years
Matthews of Neenah IINeenahWI720 2,339 (1,457)720 882 1,602 820 782 2007201135 years
Matthews of Irish RoadNeenahWI320 1,036 (74)320 962 1,282 456 826 2001201135 years
Matthews of Oak CreekOak CreekWI800 2,167 (1,373)812 782 1,594 724 870 1997201135 years
Azura Memory Care of Oak CreekOak CreekWI733 6,248 11 733 6,259 6,992 1,350 5,642 2017201735 years
Azura Memory Care of OconomowocOconomowocWI400 1,596 4,674 709 5,961 6,670 1,515 5,155 2016201535 years
Wilkinson Woods of OconomowocOconomowocWI1,100 12,436 157 1,100 12,593 13,693 3,734 9,959 1992201135 years
Azura Memory Care of OshkoshOshkoshWI190 949 190 949 1,139 351 788 1993201135 years
Matthews of PewaukeePewaukeeWI1,180 4,124 (1,804)1,197 2,303 3,500 1,499 2,001 2001201135 years
Azura Memory Care of SheboyganSheboyganWI1,060 6,208 1,905 1,094 8,079 9,173 1,978 7,195 1995201135 years
Matthews of St. Francis ISt. FrancisWI1,370 1,428 (1,428)937 433 1,370 501 869 2000201135 years
Matthews of St. Francis IISt. FrancisWI1,370 1,666 (1,558)931 547 1,478 608 870 2000201135 years
Howard Village of St. FrancisSt. FrancisWI2,320 17,232 2,320 17,232 19,552 5,159 14,393 2001201135 years
Azura Memory Care of StoughtonStoughtonWI450 3,191 450 3,191 3,641 993 2,648 1992201135 years
Oak Hill TerraceWaukeshaWI2,040 40,298 2,040 40,298 42,338 11,929 30,409 1985201135 years
Azura Memory Care of WausauWausauWI350 3,413 350 3,413 3,763 1,010 2,753 1997201135 years
Library SquareWest AllisWI1,160 23,714 1,160 23,714 24,874 6,925 17,949 1996201135 years
Matthews of WrightstownWrightstownWI140 376 12 140 388 528 199 329 1999201135 years
Garden Square Assisted Living of CasperCasperWY355 3,197 355 3,197 3,552 907 2,645 1996201135 years
Whispering ChaseCheyenneWY1,800 20,354 (202)1,800 20,152 21,952 4,319 17,633 2008201335 years
Ashridge CourtBexhill-on-SeaSXE2,274 4,791 (510)2,110 4,445 6,555 994 5,561 2010201540 years
Inglewood Nursing HomeEastbourneSXE1,908 3,021 (355)1,771 2,803 4,574 717 3,857 2010201540 years
Pentlow Nursing HomeEastbourneSXE1,964 2,462 (320)1,822 2,284 4,106 622 3,484 2007201540 years
Willows Care HomeRomfordESX4,695 6,983 (843)4,356 6,479 10,835 1,375 9,460 1986201540 years
Cedars Care HomeSouthend-on-SeaESX2,649 4,925 (546)2,458 4,570 7,028 997 6,031 2014201540 years
Mayflower Care HomeNorthfleetGSD4,330 7,519 (854)4,018 6,977 10,995 1,508 9,487 2012201540 years
Maples Care HomeBexleyheathKNT5,042 7,525 (906)4,679 6,982 11,661 1,495 10,166 2007201540 years
Barty House Nursing HomeMaidstoneKNT3,769 3,089 (494)3,497 2,867 6,364 797 5,567 2013201540 years
Tunbridge Wells Care CentreTunbridge WellsKNT4,323 5,869 (734)4,012 5,446 9,458 1,164 8,294 2010201540 years
Heathlands Care HomeChingfordLON5,398 7,967 (963)5,009 7,393 12,402 1,613 10,789 1980201540 years
Hampton CareHamptonMDX4,119 29,021 (1,205)3,970 27,965 31,935 3,012 28,923 2007201740 years
Parkfield House Nursing HomeUxbridgeMDX1,974 1,009 (108)1,903 972 2,875 133 2,742 2000201740 years
142


 Location Initial Cost to Company Gross Amount Carried at Close of Period      
Property NameCity
State /
Province
Encumbrances
Land and
Improvements
Buildings and
Improvements
Costs
Capitalized
Subsequent
to Acquisition
Land and
Improvements
Buildings and
Improvements
Total
Accumulated
Depreciation
NBV
Year of
Construction
Year
Acquired
Life on
Which
Depreciation
in Income
Statement
is Computed
Arbor House GranburyGranburyTX
390
8,186

390
8,186
8,576
1,359
7,217
2007201235 years
Copperfield EstatesHoustonTX
1,216
21,135

1,216
21,135
22,351
3,003
19,348
2009201335 years
Elmcroft of BraeswoodHoustonTX
3,970
15,919
646
3,970
16,565
20,535
3,707
16,828
1999201135 years
Elmcroft of Cy-FairHoustonTX
1,580
21,801
437
1,593
22,225
23,818
4,653
19,165
1998201135 years
Elmcroft of IrvingIrvingTX
1,620
18,755
469
1,620
19,224
20,844
4,119
16,725
1999201135 years
Whitley PlaceKellerTX

5,100
773

5,873
5,873
1,452
4,421
1998200835 years
Elmcroft of Lake JacksonLake JacksonTX
710
14,765
443
710
15,208
15,918
3,316
12,602
1998201135 years
Arbor House LewisvilleLewisvilleTX
824
10,308

824
10,308
11,132
1,719
9,413
2007201235 years
Elmcroft of Vista RidgeLewisvilleTX
6,280
10,548
(12,221)1,921
2,686
4,607
2,150
2,457
1998201135 years
Polo Park EstatesMidlandTX
765
29,447

765
29,447
30,212
4,166
26,046
1996201335 years
Arbor Hills Memory Care CommunityPlanoTX
1,014
5,719

1,014
5,719
6,733
858
5,875
2013201335 years
Arbor House of RockwallRockwallTX
1,537
12,883

1,537
12,883
14,420
2,160
12,260
2009201235 years
Elmcroft of WindcrestSan AntonioTX
920
13,011
586
920
13,597
14,517
3,113
11,404
1999201135 years
Paradise SpringsSpringTX
1,488
24,556

1,488
24,556
26,044
3,490
22,554
2008201335 years
Arbor House of TempleTempleTX
473
6,750

473
6,750
7,223
1,124
6,099
2008201235 years
Elmcroft of CottonwoodTempleTX
630
17,515
439
630
17,954
18,584
3,810
14,774
1997201135 years
Elmcroft of MainlandTexas CityTX
520
14,849
547
520
15,396
15,916
3,355
12,561
1996201135 years
Elmcroft of VictoriaVictoriaTX
440
13,040
445
440
13,485
13,925
2,959
10,966
1997201135 years
Arbor House of WeatherfordWeatherfordTX
233
3,347

233
3,347
3,580
557
3,023
1994201235 years
Elmcroft of WhartonWhartonTX
320
13,799
674
320
14,473
14,793
3,254
11,539
1996201135 years
Mountain RidgeSouth OgdenUT11,218
1,243
24,659

1,243
24,659
25,902
2,516
23,386
2001201435 years
Elmcroft of ChesterfieldRichmondVA
829
6,534
8
829
6,542
7,371
2,085
5,286
1999200635 years
Pheasant RidgeRoanokeVA
1,813
9,027

1,813
9,027
10,840
1,611
9,229
1999201235 years
Cascade Valley Senior LivingArlingtonWA
1,413
6,294

1,413
6,294
7,707
651
7,056
1995201435 years
The Bellingham at OrchardBellinghamWA
3,383
17,553
(81)3,381
17,474
20,855
1,516
19,339
1999201535 years
Bay Pointe RetirementBremertonWA
2,114
21,006
360
2,114
21,366
23,480
2,161
21,319
1999201535 years
Cooks Hill ManorCentraliaWA
520
6,144
35
520
6,179
6,699
1,385
5,314
1993201135 years
Edmonds LandingEdmondsWA
4,273
27,852
(218)4,273
27,634
31,907
2,310
29,597
2001201535 years
The Terrace at Beverly LakeEverettWA
1,515
12,520
(25)1,514
12,496
14,010
1,069
12,941
1998201535 years
The SequoiaOlympiaWA
1,490
13,724
108
1,490
13,832
15,322
2,931
12,391
1995201135 years
Bishop Place Senior LivingPullmanWA
1,780
33,608

1,780
33,608
35,388
3,415
31,973
1998201435 years
Willow GardensPuyallupWA
1,959
35,492

1,959
35,492
37,451
5,041
32,410
1996201335 years
BirchviewSedro-WoolleyWA
210
14,145
98
210
14,243
14,453
2,782
11,671
1996201135 years
Discovery Memory careSequimWA
320
10,544
132
320
10,676
10,996
2,171
8,825
1961201135 years
The Village Retirement & Assisted LivingTacomaWA
2,200
5,938
637
2,200
6,575
8,775
1,618
7,157
1976201135 years
Clearwater SpringsVancouverWA
1,269
9,840
193
1,269
10,033
11,302
1,188
10,114
2003201535 years
Matthews of Appleton IAppletonWI
130
1,834
(41)130
1,793
1,923
411
1,512
1996201135 years
Matthews of Appleton IIAppletonWI
140
2,016
301
140
2,317
2,457
484
1,973
1997201135 years

 Location Initial Cost to CompanyGross Amount Carried at Close of Period   
Property NameCityState /
Province
EncumbrancesLand and
Improvements
Buildings and
Improvements
Costs
Capitalized
Subsequent
to Acquisition1
Land and
Improvements
Buildings and
Improvements
TotalAccumulated
Depreciation
NBVYear of
Construction
Year
Acquired
Life on
Which
Depreciation
in Income
Statement
is Computed
Princeton Village of LargoLargoFL1,718 10,438 (4,205)1,718 6,233 7,951 2,551 5,400 2007201535 years
BoréaBlainvilleQC35,658 2,678 56,643 1,430 2,861 57,890 60,751 1,838 58,913 2016201957 years
CaléoBouchervilleQC54,225 6,009 71,056 1,664 6,151 72,578 78,729 2,154 76,575 2018201959 years
L'AvantageBrossardQC20,086 8,771 44,920 1,465 8,950 46,206 55,156 1,627 53,529 2011201952 years
SeväCandiacQC47,758 4,030 64,251 1,570 4,129 65,722 69,851 2,126 67,725 2018201959 years
L'InitialGatineauQC49,215 6,720 62,928 1,561 6,861 64,348 71,209 1,963 69,246 2019201960 years
La Croisée de l'EstGranbyQC15,335 1,136 40,998 1,143 1,159 42,118 43,277 1,553 41,724 2009201950 years
AmbianceIle-des-Soeurs,VerdunQC20,512 5,007 51,624 1,571 5,108 53,094 58,202 1,978 56,224 2005201946 years
Le SavignonLachineQC25,968 5,271 46,919 1,335 5,377 48,148 53,525 1,607 51,918 2013201954 years
Le CavalierLasalleQC14,908 5,892 38,926 1,350 6,010 40,158 46,168 1,662 44,506 2004201945 years
Quartier SudLévisQC29,712 1,933 47,731 650 1,931 48,383 50,314 1,536 48,778 2015201956 years
MargoLévisQC40,060 2,034 63,523 1,285 2,078 64,764 66,842 1,977 64,865 2017201960 years
Les Promenades du ParcLongueuilQC21,495 5,832 47,101 1,662 5,950 48,645 54,595 1,986 52,609 2006201947 years
ElogiaMontréalQC27,069 2,808 55,175 26,181 2,929 81,235 84,164 1,974 82,190 2007201948 years
Les Jardins MillenMontréalQC28,169 4,325 82,121 1,972 4,412 84,006 88,418 2,593 85,825 2012201953 years
Le 22MontréalQC38,776 6,728 70,601 1,671 6,863 72,137 79,000 2,213 76,787 2016201957 years
Station EstMontréalQC44,471 4,660 59,110 1,351 4,760 60,361 65,121 1,919 63,202 2017201958 years
OraMontréalQC56,763 10,282 82,095 3,171 10,564 84,984 95,548 2,370 93,178 2019201960 years
Elogia IIMontréalQC34,044 2,627 29,299 2,627 29,299 31,926 31,926 CIPCIPCIP
Le Quartier Mont-St-HilaireMont-Saint-HilaireQC14,140 1,020 32,554 1,055 1,041 33,588 34,629 1,316 33,313 2008201949 years
L'Image d'OutremontOutremontQC15,832 4,565 32,030 1,251 4,656 33,190 37,846 1,196 36,650 2008201949 years
Le GibraltarQuébecQC20,759 1,191 42,766 1,071 1,214 43,814 45,028 1,446 43,582 2013201954 years
ÉklaQuébecQC52,680 2,256 87,772 1,948 2,324 89,652 91,976 2,671 89,305 2017201957 years
Le Notre-DameRepentignyQC13,751 3,290 41,474 1,516 3,357 42,923 46,280 1,846 44,434 2002201943 years
Vent de l'OuestSainte-GenevièveQC12,553 4,713 32,526 1,241 4,808 33,672 38,480 1,475 37,005 2007201948 years
Les Verrières du GolfSaint-LaurentQC24,201 5,183 44,363 1,746 5,312 45,980 51,292 1,821 49,471 2003201944 years
Les Jardins du CampanileShawiniganQC11,621 578 16,580 905 590 17,473 18,063 903 17,160 2007201948 years
SherbrookeQC35,443 706 58,073 1,298 720 59,357 60,077 1,843 58,234 2015201956 years
La Cité des ToursSt-Jean-sur-RichelieuQC21,934 1,744 44,357 1,101 1,788 45,414 47,202 1,624 45,578 2012201953 years
IVVISt-LaurentQC53,183 6,307 64,131 6,307 64,131 70,438 374 70,064 2020202060 years
VASTSt-LaurentQC41,809 4,648 62,521 4,648 62,521 67,169 84 67,085 2020202060 years
CorneliusSt-LaurentQC9,853 7,813 25,026 7,813 25,026 32,839 32,839 CIPCIPCIP
LizSt-LaurentQC11,534 11,937 22,567 11,937 22,567 34,504 34,504 CIPCIPCIP
FloréaTerrebonneQC41,640 3,275 63,246 1,421 3,341 64,601 67,942 2,057 65,885 2016201957 years
Les Résidences du MarchéSte-ThérèseQC22,243 2,124 25,371 2,124 25,371 27,495 713 26,782 2000202040 Years
LiloIle-PerrotQC40,635 5,324 45,948 5,324 45,948 51,272 868 50,404 2017202057 years
143


 Location Initial Cost to Company Gross Amount Carried at Close of Period      
Property NameCity
State /
Province
Encumbrances
Land and
Improvements
Buildings and
Improvements
Costs
Capitalized
Subsequent
to Acquisition
Land and
Improvements
Buildings and
Improvements
Total
Accumulated
Depreciation
NBV
Year of
Construction
Year
Acquired
Life on
Which
Depreciation
in Income
Statement
is Computed
Hunters RidgeBeaver DamWI
260
2,380

260
2,380
2,640
522
2,118
1998201135 years
Harbor House BeloitBeloitWI
150
4,356
427
191
4,742
4,933
916
4,017
1990201135 years
Harbor House ClintonClintonWI
290
4,390

290
4,390
4,680
889
3,791
1991201135 years
CreeksideCudahyWI
760
1,693

760
1,693
2,453
401
2,052
2001201135 years
Harbor House Eau ClaireEau ClaireWI
210
6,259

210
6,259
6,469
1,242
5,227
1996201135 years
Chapel ValleyFitchburgWI
450
2,372

450
2,372
2,822
527
2,295
1998201135 years
Matthews of Milwaukee IIFox PointWI
1,810
943
37
1,820
970
2,790
310
2,480
1999201135 years
Laurel OaksGlendaleWI
2,390
43,587
3,556
2,510
47,023
49,533
9,097
40,436
1988201135 years
Layton TerraceGreenfieldWI
3,490
39,201
382
3,480
39,593
43,073
8,084
34,989
1999201135 years
Matthews of HartlandHartlandWI
640
1,663
43
652
1,694
2,346
467
1,879
1985201135 years
Matthews of HoriconHoriconWI
340
3,327
(95)345
3,227
3,572
801
2,771
2002201135 years
JeffersonJeffersonWI
330
2,384

330
2,384
2,714
523
2,191
1997201135 years
Harbor House KenoshaKenoshaWI
710
3,254
3,641
1,156
6,449
7,605
1,031
6,574
1996201135 years
Harbor House ManitowocManitowocWI
140
1,520

140
1,520
1,660
324
1,336
1997201135 years
Adare IIMenashaWI
110
537
(493)94
60
154
154

1994201135 years
Adare IVMenashaWI
110
537
(503)94
50
144
144

1994201135 years
Adare IIIMenashaWI
90
557
(493)65
89
154
154

1993201135 years
Adare IMenashaWI
90
557
(500)74
73
147
147

1993201135 years
The ArboretumMenomonee FallsWI
5,640
49,083
1,813
5,640
50,896
56,536
10,640
45,896
1989201135 years
Matthews of Milwaukee IMilwaukeeWI
1,800
935
119
1,800
1,054
2,854
323
2,531
1999201135 years
Hart Park SquareMilwaukeeWI
1,900
21,628
34
1,900
21,662
23,562
4,462
19,100
2005201135 years
Harbor House MonroeMonroeWI
490
4,964

490
4,964
5,454
1,018
4,436
1990201135 years
Matthews of Neenah INeenahWI
710
1,157
64
713
1,218
1,931
342
1,589
2006201135 years
Matthews of Neenah IINeenahWI
720
2,339
(50)720
2,289
3,009
583
2,426
2007201135 years
Matthews of Irish RoadNeenahWI
320
1,036
87
320
1,123
1,443
322
1,121
2001201135 years
Matthews of Oak CreekOak CreekWI
800
2,167
(2)812
2,153
2,965
515
2,450
1997201135 years
Azura Memory Care of Oak CreekOak CreekWI
727
6,254

727
6,254
6,981
120
6,861
2017201735 years
Harbor House OconomowocOconomowocWI
400
1,596
4,674
709
5,961
6,670
497
6,173
2016201535 years
Wilkinson Woods of OconomowocOconomowocWI
1,100
12,436
157
1,100
12,593
13,693
2,557
11,136
1992201135 years
Harbor House OshkoshOshkoshWI
190
949

190
949
1,139
256
883
1993201135 years
Matthews of PewaukeePewaukeeWI
1,180
4,124
206
1,197
4,313
5,510
1,060
4,450
2001201135 years
Harbor House SheboyganSheboyganWI
1,060
6,208

1,060
6,208
7,268
1,249
6,019
1995201135 years
Matthews of St. Francis ISt. FrancisWI
1,370
1,428
(113)1,389
1,296
2,685
369
2,316
2000201135 years
Matthews of St. Francis IISt. FrancisWI
1,370
1,666
15
1,377
1,674
3,051
428
2,623
2000201135 years
Howard Village of St. FrancisSt. FrancisWI
2,320
17,232

2,320
17,232
19,552
3,628
15,924
2001201135 years
Harbor House StoughtonStoughtonWI
450
3,191

450
3,191
3,641
702
2,939
1992201135 years
Oak Hill TerraceWaukeshaWI
2,040
40,298
440
2,040
40,738
42,778
8,320
34,458
1985201135 years
Harbor House Rib MountainWausauWI
350
3,413

350
3,413
3,763
707
3,056
1997201135 years

 Location Initial Cost to CompanyGross Amount Carried at Close of Period   
Property NameCityState /
Province
EncumbrancesLand and
Improvements
Buildings and
Improvements
Costs
Capitalized
Subsequent
to Acquisition1
Land and
Improvements
Buildings and
Improvements
TotalAccumulated
Depreciation
NBVYear of
Construction
Year
Acquired
Life on
Which
Depreciation
in Income
Statement
is Computed
Le Félix Vaudreuil-DorionVaudreuil-DorionQC25,803 7,531 34,624 1,432 7,682 35,905 43,587 1,424 42,163 2010201951 years
TOTAL FOR OTHER SENIOR HOUSING COMMUNITIES1,333,759 617,774 6,179,476 188,514 615,447 6,370,317 6,985,764 1,242,978 5,742,786 
TOTAL FOR SENIOR HOUSING COMMUNITIES1,589,318 1,584,636 15,254,039 1,025,745 1,607,351 16,257,069 17,864,420 4,779,527 13,084,893 
MEDICAL OFFICE BUILDINGS
St. Vincent's Medical Center East #46BirminghamAL25,298 5,155 30,453 30,453 12,512 17,941 2005201035 years
St. Vincent's Medical Center East #48BirminghamAL12,698 1,308 14,006 14,006 5,020 8,986 1989201035 years
St. Vincent's Medical Center East #52BirminghamAL7,608 2,262 9,870 9,870 4,268 5,602 1985201035 years
Crestwood Medical PavilionHuntsvilleAL1,667 625 16,178 732 625 16,910 17,535 5,431 12,104 1994201135 years
West Valley Medical CenterBuckeye1AZ3,348 5,233 3,348 5,233 8,581 1,571 7,010 2011201531 years
Canyon Springs Medical PlazaGilbertAZ27,497 1,106 28,603 28,603 8,491 20,112 2007201235 years
Mercy Gilbert Medical Plaza 1GilbertAZ720 11,277 1,786 772 13,011 13,783 5,024 8,759 2007201135 years
Mercy Gilbert Medical Plaza IIGilbertAZ16,520 18,610 1,034 19,644 19,644 1,232 18,412 2019201935 years
Thunderbird Paseo Medical PlazaGlendaleAZ12,904 1,352 20 14,236 14,256 4,451 9,805 1997201135 years
Thunderbird Paseo Medical Plaza IIGlendaleAZ8,100 999 20 9,079 9,099 2,872 6,227 2001201135 years
Arrowhead Physicians PlazaGlendaleAZ9,967 308 19,671 548 308 20,219 20,527 1,454 19,073 2004201835 years
1432 S DobsonMesaAZ32,768 1,658 34,426 34,426 8,240 26,186 2003201335 years
1450 S DobsonMesaAZ11,923 2,063 13,982 13,986 3,990 9,996 1977201135 years
1500 S DobsonMesaAZ7,395 2,412 9,803 9,807 2,886 6,921 1980201135 years
1520 S DobsonMesaAZ13,665 4,285 17,950 17,950 5,080 12,870 1986201135 years
Deer Valley Medical Office Building IIPhoenixAZ22,663 1,857 14 24,506 24,520 7,185 17,335 2002201135 years
Deer Valley Medical Office Building IIIPhoenixAZ19,521 1,467 12 20,976 20,988 6,222 14,766 2009201135 years
Papago Medical ParkPhoenixAZ12,172 2,392 14,564 14,564 4,797 9,767 1989201135 years
North Valley Orthopedic Surgery CenterPhoenixAZ2,800 10,150 2,800 10,150 12,950 2,284 10,666 2006201535 years
Davita Dialysis - Marked TreeMarked TreeAR179 1,580 179 1,580 1,759 386 1,373 2009201535 years
Burbank Medical Plaza IBurbankCA1,241 23,322 2,501 1,268 25,796 27,064 9,090 17,974 2004201135 years
Burbank Medical Plaza IIBurbankCA31,583 491 45,641 1,256 497 46,891 47,388 14,074 33,314 2008201135 years
Eden Medical PlazaCastro ValleyCA258 2,455 460 328 2,845 3,173 1,649 1,524 1998201125 years
Sutter Medical CenterCastro ValleyCA25,088 1,471 26,559 26,559 6,095 20,464 2012201235 years
United Healthcare - CypressCypressCA12,883 38,309 1,502 12,883 39,811 52,694 10,982 41,712 1985201529 years
NorthBay Corporate HeadquartersFairfieldCA19,187 19,187 19,187 4,898 14,289 2008201235 years
Gateway Medical PlazaFairfieldCA12,872 797 13,669 13,669 3,331 10,338 1986201235 years
Solano NorthBay Health PlazaFairfieldCA8,880 39 8,919 8,919 2,257 6,662 1990201235 years
NorthBay Healthcare MOBFairfieldCA8,507 2,280 10,787 10,787 3,686 7,101 2014201335 years
UC Davis Medical GroupFolsomCA1,873 10,156 260 1,873 10,416 12,289 2,515 9,774 1995201535 years
Verdugo Hills Medical Bulding IGlendaleCA6,683 9,589 2,738 6,768 12,242 19,010 5,711 13,299 1972201223 years
Verdugo Hills Medical Bulding IIGlendaleCA4,464 3,731 3,042 4,514 6,723 11,237 4,062 7,175 1987201219 years
Grossmont Medical TerraceLa MesaCA88 14,192 376 88 14,568 14,656 2,418 12,238 2008201635 years
144


 Location Initial Cost to Company Gross Amount Carried at Close of Period      
Property NameCity
State /
Province
Encumbrances
Land and
Improvements
Buildings and
Improvements
Costs
Capitalized
Subsequent
to Acquisition
Land and
Improvements
Buildings and
Improvements
Total
Accumulated
Depreciation
NBV
Year of
Construction
Year
Acquired
Life on
Which
Depreciation
in Income
Statement
is Computed
Library SquareWest AllisWI
1,160
23,714

1,160
23,714
24,874
4,868
20,006
1996201135 years
Matthews of WrightstownWrightstownWI
140
376
12
140
388
528
148
380
1999201135 years
Madison HouseKirklandWA
4,291
26,787

4,291
26,787
31,078
755
30,323
1978201735 years
Delaware PlazaLongviewWA4,189
620
5,116

620
5,116
5,736
142
5,594
1972201735 years
Canterbury GardensLongviewWA5,586
444
13,698

444
13,698
14,142
364
13,778
1998201735 years
Canterbury InnLongviewWA14,568
1,462
34,507

1,462
34,507
35,969
893
35,076
1989201735 years
Canterbury ParkLongviewWA
969
30,109

969
30,109
31,078
834
30,244
2000201735 years
Cascade InnVancouverWA12,378
3,201
18,996

3,201
18,996
22,197
535
21,662
1979201735 years
The Hampton & Ashley InnVancouverWA
1,855
21,047

1,855
21,047
22,902
581
22,321
1992201735 years
The Hampton at Salmon CreekVancouverWA11,872
1,256
21,686

1,256
21,686
22,942
418
22,524
2013201735 years
Outlook Pointe at Teays ValleyHurricaneWV
1,950
14,489
300
1,950
14,789
16,739
2,912
13,827
1999201135 years
Elmcroft of MartinsburgMartinsburgWV
248
8,320
9
248
8,329
8,577
2,655
5,922
1999200635 years
Garden Square Assisted Living of CasperCasperWY
355
3,197

355
3,197
3,552
628
2,924
1996201135 years
Whispering ChaseCheyenneWY
1,800
20,354

1,800
20,354
22,154
2,904
19,250
2008201335 years
Hampton CareHamptonUK
3,923
27,637

3,923
27,637
31,560
485
31,075
2007201740 years
Parkfield House Nursing HomeUxbridgeUK
1,880
960

1,880
960
2,840
21
2,819
2000201740 years
TOTAL FOR OTHER SENIORS HOUSING COMMUNITIES  190,394
519,074
4,646,262
52,129
511,585
4,705,880
5,217,465
831,359
4,386,106
   
TOTAL FOR SENIORS HOUSING COMMUNITIES  942,667
1,498,988
13,957,788
618,741
1,502,949
14,572,568
16,075,517
3,417,584
12,657,933
   
MEDICAL OFFICE BUILDINGS              
St. Vincent's Medical Center East #46BirminghamAL

25,298
4,061

29,359
29,359
8,989
20,370
2005201035 years
St. Vincent's Medical Center East #48BirminghamAL

12,698
509

13,207
13,207
3,641
9,566
1989201035 years
St. Vincent's Medical Center East #52BirminghamAL

7,608
1,461

9,069
9,069
3,071
5,998
1985201035 years
Crestwood Medical PavilionHuntsvilleAL3,226
625
16,178
159
625
16,337
16,962
3,804
13,158
1994201135 years
Davita Dialysis - Marked TreeMarked TreeAR
179
1,580

179
1,580
1,759
190
1,569
2009201535 years
West Valley Medical CenterBuckeyeAZ
3,348
5,233

3,348
5,233
8,581
775
7,806
2011201531 years
Canyon Springs Medical PlazaGilbertAZ

27,497
532

28,029
28,029
5,939
22,090
2007201235 years
Mercy Gilbert Medical PlazaGilbertAZ7,330
720
11,277
1,068
720
12,345
13,065
3,281
9,784
2007201135 years
Thunderbird Paseo Medical PlazaGlendaleAZ

12,904
871
20
13,755
13,775
2,927
10,848
1997201135 years
Thunderbird Paseo Medical Plaza IIGlendaleAZ

8,100
516
20
8,596
8,616
1,972
6,644
2001201135 years
Desert Medical PavilionMesaAZ

32,768
501

33,269
33,269
4,933
28,336
2003201335 years
Desert Samaritan Medical Building IMesaAZ

11,923
677
4
12,596
12,600
2,630
9,970
1977201135 years
Desert Samaritan Medical Building IIMesaAZ

7,395
405
4
7,796
7,800
1,800
6,000
1980201135 years
Desert Samaritan Medical Building IIIMesaAZ

13,665
1,203

14,868
14,868
3,219
11,649
1986201135 years
Deer Valley Medical Office Building IIPhoenixAZ

22,663
626
14
23,275
23,289
4,866
18,423
2002201135 years
Deer Valley Medical Office Building IIIPhoenixAZ

19,521
287
12
19,796
19,808
4,239
15,569
2009201135 years

 Location Initial Cost to CompanyGross Amount Carried at Close of Period   
Property NameCityState /
Province
EncumbrancesLand and
Improvements
Buildings and
Improvements
Costs
Capitalized
Subsequent
to Acquisition1
Land and
Improvements
Buildings and
Improvements
TotalAccumulated
Depreciation
NBVYear of
Construction
Year
Acquired
Life on
Which
Depreciation
in Income
Statement
is Computed
Los Alamitos Medical & Wellness PavilionLos AlamitosCA11,586 488 31,720 61 488 31,781 32,269 2,282 29,987 2013201835 years
St. Francis Lynwood MedicalLynwoodCA688 8,385 1,965 697 10,341 11,038 4,968 6,070 1993201132 years
Facey Mission HillsMission HillsCA15,468 30,116 4,729 15,468 34,845 50,313 8,073 42,240 2012201235 years
Mission Medical PlazaMission ViejoCA52,783 1,916 77,022 2,723 1,916 79,745 81,661 25,025 56,636 2007201135 years
St Joseph Medical TowerOrangeCA42,170 1,752 61,647 4,216 1,761 65,854 67,615 20,686 46,929 2008201135 years
Huntington PavilionPasadenaCA3,138 83,412 11,894 3,138 95,306 98,444 35,881 62,563 2009201135 years
Western University of Health Sciences Medical PavilionPomonaCA91 31,523 91 31,523 31,614 9,374 22,240 2009201135 years
Pomerado Outpatient PavilionPowayCA3,233 71,435 3,298 3,233 74,733 77,966 25,646 52,320 2007201135 years
San Bernardino Medical Plaza ISan BernadinoCA789 11,133 2,349 797 13,474 14,271 11,962 2,309 1971201127 years
San Bernardino Medical Plaza IISan BernadinoCA416 5,625 1,204 421 6,824 7,245 4,050 3,195 1988201126 years
Sutter Van NessSan FranciscoCA104,794 157,404 918 158,322 158,322 9,298 149,024 2019201935 years
San Gabriel Valley Medical PlazaSan GabrielCA914 5,510 1,314 963 6,775 7,738 3,330 4,408 2004201135 years
Santa Clarita Valley Medical PlazaSanta ClaritaCA20,909 9,708 20,020 2,032 9,782 21,978 31,760 7,609 24,151 2005201135 years
Kenneth E Watts Medical PlazaTorranceCA262 6,945 3,924 494 10,637 11,131 5,507 5,624 1989201123 years
Vaca Valley Health PlazaVacavilleCA9,634 979 10,613 10,613 2,504 8,109 1988201235 years
NorthBay Center For Primary Care - VacavilleVacavilleCA777 5,632 300 777 5,932 6,709 695 6,014 1998201735 years
Potomac Medical PlazaAuroraCO2,401 9,118 4,890 2,865 13,544 16,409 7,203 9,206 1986200735 years
Briargate Medical CampusColorado SpringsCO1,238 12,301 1,760 1,310 13,989 15,299 5,908 9,391 2002200735 years
Printers Park Medical PlazaColorado SpringsCO2,641 47,507 4,034 3,642 50,540 54,182 22,474 31,708 1999200735 years
Green Valley Ranch MOBDenverCO12,139 1,564 259 13,444 13,703 3,180 10,523 2007201235 years
Community Physicians PavilionLafayetteCO10,436 2,018 12,454 12,454 4,979 7,475 2004201035 years
Exempla Good Samaritan Medical CenterLafayetteCO4,393 (57)4,336 4,336 874 3,462 2013201335 years
Dakota RidgeLittletonCO2,540 12,901 2,221 2,562 15,100 17,662 3,124 14,538 2007201535 years
Avista Two Medical PlazaLouisvilleCO17,330 2,232 19,562 19,562 7,907 11,655 2003200935 years
The Sierra Medical BuildingParkerCO1,444 14,059 3,509 1,516 17,496 19,012 8,609 10,403 2009200935 years
Crown Point Healthcare PlazaParkerCO852 5,210 715 946 5,831 6,777 1,470 5,307 2008201335 years
Lutheran Medical Office Building IIWheat RidgeCO2,655 1,330 3,985 3,985 2,065 1,920 1976201035 years
Lutheran Medical Office Building IVWheat RidgeCO7,266 2,462 9,728 9,728 3,900 5,828 1991201035 years
Lutheran Medical Office Building IIIWheat RidgeCO11,947 2,324 14,271 14,271 4,947 9,324 2004201035 years
DePaul Professional Office BuildingWashingtonDC6,424 3,064 9,488 9,488 4,754 4,734 1987201035 years
Providence Medical Office BuildingWashingtonDC2,473 1,344 3,817 3,817 2,074 1,743 1975201035 years
RTS Cape CoralCape CoralFL368 5,448 368 5,448 5,816 1,761 4,055 1984201134 years
RTS Ft. MyersFort MyersFL1,153 4,127 1,153 4,127 5,280 1,604 3,676 1989201131 years
RTS Key WestKey WestFL486 4,380 486 4,380 4,866 1,273 3,593 1987201135 years
JFK Medical PlazaLake WorthFL453 1,711 (147)2,017 2,017 982 1,035 1999200435 years
East Pointe Medical PlazaLehigh AcresFL327 11,816 327 11,816 12,143 2,454 9,689 1994201535 years
Palms West Building 6LoxahatcheeFL965 2,678 (622)3,021 3,021 1,383 1,638 2000200435 years
145
 Location Initial Cost to Company Gross Amount Carried at Close of Period      
Property NameCity
State /
Province
Encumbrances
Land and
Improvements
Buildings and
Improvements
Costs
Capitalized
Subsequent
to Acquisition
Land and
Improvements
Buildings and
Improvements
Total
Accumulated
Depreciation
NBV
Year of
Construction
Year
Acquired
Life on
Which
Depreciation
in Income
Statement
is Computed
Papago Medical ParkPhoenixAZ

12,172
1,561

13,733
13,733
2,983
10,750
1989201135 years
North Valley Orthopedic Surgery CenterPhoenixAZ
2,800
10,150

2,800
10,150
12,950
1,126
11,824
2006201535 years
Burbank Medical PlazaBurbankCA
1,241
23,322
1,149
1,268
24,444
25,712
6,084
19,628
2004201135 years
Burbank Medical Plaza IIBurbankCA33,726
491
45,641
382
497
46,017
46,514
9,744
36,770
2008201135 years
Eden Medical PlazaCastro ValleyCA
258
2,455
394
328
2,779
3,107
1,147
1,960
1998201125 years
Sutter Medical CenterCastro ValleyCA

25,088
1,387

26,475
26,475
3,810
22,665
2012201235 years
United Healthcare - CypressCypressCA
12,883
38,309

12,883
38,309
51,192
5,414
45,778
1985201529 years
NorthBay Corporate HeadquartersFairfieldCA

19,187


19,187
19,187
3,061
16,126
2008201235 years
Gateway Medical PlazaFairfieldCA

12,872
65

12,937
12,937
2,054
10,883
1986201235 years
Solano NorthBay Health PlazaFairfieldCA

8,880
39

8,919
8,919
1,410
7,509
1990201235 years
NorthBay Healthcare MOBFairfieldCA

8,507
2,280

10,787
10,787
2,073
8,714
2014201335 years
UC Davis MedicalFolsomCA
1,873
10,156
13
1,873
10,169
12,042
1,225
10,817
1995201535 years
Verdugo Hills Professional Bldg IGlendaleCA
6,683
9,589
1,725
6,693
11,304
17,997
3,377
14,620
1972201223 years
Verdugo Hills Professional Bldg IIGlendaleCA
4,464
3,731
2,359
4,469
6,085
10,554
2,079
8,475
1987201219 years
Grossmont Medical TerraceLa MesaCA
88
14,192
126
88
14,318
14,406
850
13,556
2008201635 years
St. Francis Lynwood MedicalLynwoodCA
688
8,385
1,471
697
9,847
10,544
3,210
7,334
1993201132 years
PMB Mission HillsMission HillsCA
15,468
30,116
4,729
15,468
34,845
50,313
5,086
45,227
2012201235 years
PDP Mission ViejoMission ViejoCA56,345
1,916
77,022
959
1,916
77,981
79,897
17,040
62,857
2007201135 years
PDP OrangeOrangeCA44,896
1,752
61,647
1,351
1,761
62,989
64,750
13,922
50,828
2008201135 years
NHP/PMB PasadenaPasadenaCA
3,138
83,412
9,199
3,138
92,611
95,749
24,033
71,716
2009201135 years
Western University of Health Sciences Medical PavilionPomonaCA
91
31,523

91
31,523
31,614
6,547
25,067
2009201135 years
Pomerado Outpatient PavilionPowayCA
3,233
71,435
3,000
3,233
74,435
77,668
17,861
59,807
2007201135 years
Sutter Van NessSan FranciscoCA34,675

84,520


84,520
84,520

84,520
CIPCIPCIP
San Gabriel Valley MedicalSan GabrielCA
914
5,510
725
950
6,199
7,149
2,201
4,948
2004201135 years
Santa Clarita Valley MedicalSanta ClaritaCA22,236
9,708
20,020
1,500
9,782
21,446
31,228
5,104
26,124
2005201135 years
Kenneth E Watts Medical PlazaTorranceCA
262
6,945
2,462
334
9,335
9,669
3,224
6,445
1989201123 years
Vaca Valley Health PlazaVacavilleCA

9,634
612

10,246
10,246
1,516
8,730
1988201235 years
Potomac Medical PlazaAuroraCO
2,401
9,118
3,162
2,800
11,881
14,681
5,655
9,026
1986200735 years
Briargate Medical CampusColorado SpringsCO
1,238
12,301
442
1,259
12,722
13,981
4,710
9,271
2002200735 years
Printers Park Medical PlazaColorado SpringsCO
2,641
47,507
1,828
2,641
49,335
51,976
17,936
34,040
1999200735 years
Green Valley Ranch MOBDenverCO5,485

12,139
1,011
235
12,915
13,150
1,841
11,309
2007201235 years
Community Physicians PavilionLafayetteCO

10,436
1,757

12,193
12,193
3,552
8,641
2004201035 years
Exempla Good Samaritan Medical CenterLafayetteCO

4,393
(75)
4,318
4,318
504
3,814
2013201335 years
Dakota RidgeLittletonCO
2,540
12,901
356
2,540
13,257
15,797
1,432
14,365
2007201535 years
Avista Two Medical PlazaLouisvilleCO

17,330
1,811

19,141
19,141
6,242
12,899
2003200935 years
The Sierra Medical BuildingParkerCO
1,444
14,059
3,287
1,492
17,298
18,790
6,712
12,078
2009200935 years
Crown Point Healthcare PlazaParkerCO
852
5,210
109
852
5,319
6,171
860
5,311
2008201335 years



 Location Initial Cost to CompanyGross Amount Carried at Close of Period   
Property NameCityState /
Province
EncumbrancesLand and
Improvements
Buildings and
Improvements
Costs
Capitalized
Subsequent
to Acquisition1
Land and
Improvements
Buildings and
Improvements
TotalAccumulated
Depreciation
NBVYear of
Construction
Year
Acquired
Life on
Which
Depreciation
in Income
Statement
is Computed
Bay Medical PlazaLynn HavenFL4,215 15,041 (13,601)3,644 2,011 5,655 2,374 3,281 2003201535 years
RTS NaplesNaplesFL1,152 3,726 1,152 3,726 4,878 1,221 3,657 1999201135 years
Bay Medical CenterPanama CityFL82 17,400 3,507 25 20,964 20,989 2,669 18,320 1987201535 years
RTS Pt. CharlottePt CharlotteFL966 4,581 966 4,581 5,547 1,569 3,978 1985201134 years
RTS SarasotaSarasotaFL1,914 3,889 1,914 3,889 5,803 1,405 4,398 1996201135 years
Capital Regional MOB ITallahasseeFL590 8,773 (324)193 8,846 9,039 1,667 7,372 1998201535 years
Athens Medical ComplexAthensGA2,826 18,339 109 2,826 18,448 21,274 3,942 17,332 2011201535 years
Doctors Center at St. Joseph's HospitalAtlantaGA545 80,152 24,683 545 104,835 105,380 26,230 79,150 1978201520 years
Augusta POB IAugustaGA233 7,894 2,512 233 10,406 10,639 6,961 3,678 1978201214 years
Augusta POB IIAugustaGA735 13,717 6,831 735 20,548 21,283 7,882 13,401 1987201223 years
Augusta POB IIIAugustaGA535 3,857 960 535 4,817 5,352 2,679 2,673 1994201222 years
Augusta POB IVAugustaGA675 2,182 2,296 691 4,462 5,153 2,726 2,427 1995201223 years
Cobb Physicians CenterAustellGA1,145 16,805 1,948 1,145 18,753 19,898 7,398 12,500 1992201135 years
Summit Professional Plaza IBrunswickGA1,821 2,974 376 1,824 3,347 5,171 3,601 1,570 2004201231 years
Summit Professional Plaza IIBrunswickGA981 13,818 406 981 14,224 15,205 4,913 10,292 1998201235 years
Fayette MOBFayettevilleGA895 20,669 1,405 895 22,074 22,969 4,736 18,233 2004201535 years
Woodlawn Commons 1121/1163MariettaGA5,495 16,028 2,306 5,586 18,243 23,829 3,984 19,845 1991201535 years
PAPP ClinicNewnanGA2,167 5,477 68 2,167 5,545 7,712 1,736 5,976 1994201530 years
Parkway Physicians CenterRinggoldGA476 10,017 1,381 476 11,398 11,874 4,383 7,491 2004201135 years
Riverdale MOBRiverdaleGA1,025 9,783 355 1,025 10,138 11,163 2,429 8,734 2005201535 years
Rush Copley POB IAuroraIL120 27,882 1,369 120 29,251 29,371 6,175 23,196 1996201534 years
Rush Copley POB IIAuroraIL49 27,217 522 49 27,739 27,788 5,557 22,231 2009201535 years
Good Shepherd Physician Office Building IBarringtonIL152 3,224 835 152 4,059 4,211 1,028 3,183 1979201335 years
Good Shepherd Physician Office Building IIBarringtonIL512 12,977 1,235 512 14,212 14,724 3,731 10,993 1996201335 years
Trinity Hospital Physician Office BuildingChicagoIL139 3,329 1,587 139 4,916 5,055 1,631 3,424 1971201335 years
Advocate Beverly CenterChicagoIL2,227 10,140 412 2,231 10,548 12,779 3,271 9,508 1986201525 years
Crystal Lakes Medical ArtsCrystal LakeIL2,490 19,504 437 2,535 19,896 22,431 4,438 17,993 2007201535 years
Advocate Good ShepherdCrystal LakeIL2,444 10,953 949 2,444 11,902 14,346 3,017 11,329 2008201533 years
Physicians Plaza EastDecaturIL791 2,558 3,344 3,349 1,453 1,896 1976201035 years
Physicians Plaza WestDecaturIL1,943 1,207 3,150 3,150 1,474 1,676 1987201035 years
SIU Family PracticeDecaturIL3,900 3,782 7,682 7,682 3,567 4,115 1996201035 years
304 W Hay BuildingDecaturIL8,702 2,447 29 11,120 11,149 4,233 6,916 2002201035 years
302 W Hay BuildingDecaturIL3,467 859 4,326 4,326 1,997 2,329 1993201035 years
ENTADecaturIL1,150 16 1,166 1,166 511 655 1996201035 years
301 W Hay BuildingDecaturIL640 22 662 662 369 293 1980201035 years
South Shore Medical BuildingDecaturIL902 129 56 958 129 1,087 223 864 1991201035 years
Kenwood Medical CenterDecaturIL1,689 1,520 3,209 3,209 1,376 1,833 1997201035 years
DMH OCC Health & Wellness PartnersDecaturIL934 1,386 168 943 1,545 2,488 748 1,740 1996201035 years
Rock Springs MedicalDecaturIL399 495 109 399 604 1,003 309 694 1990201035 years
146


 Location Initial Cost to Company Gross Amount Carried at Close of Period      
Property NameCity
State /
Province
Encumbrances
Land and
Improvements
Buildings and
Improvements
Costs
Capitalized
Subsequent
to Acquisition
Land and
Improvements
Buildings and
Improvements
Total
Accumulated
Depreciation
NBV
Year of
Construction
Year
Acquired
Life on
Which
Depreciation
in Income
Statement
is Computed
Lutheran Medical Office Building IIWheat RidgeCO

2,655
1,253

3,908
3,908
1,365
2,543
1976201035 years
Lutheran Medical Office Building IVWheat RidgeCO

7,266
1,947

9,213
9,213
2,553
6,660
1991201035 years
Lutheran Medical Office Building IIIWheat RidgeCO

11,947
1,094

13,041
13,041
3,328
9,713
2004201035 years
DePaul Professional Office BuildingWashingtonDC

6,424
2,297

8,721
8,721
3,376
5,345
1987201035 years
Providence Medical Office BuildingWashingtonDC

2,473
970

3,443
3,443
1,452
1,991
1975201035 years
RTS ArcadiaArcadiaFL
345
2,884

345
2,884
3,229
770
2,459
1993201130 years
NorthBay Center For Primary Care - VacavilleVacavilleCA
777
5,632

777
5,632
6,409
47
6,362
1998201735 years
Aventura Medical PlazaAventuraFL
401
3,338
49
401
3,387
3,788
675
3,113
1996201526 years
RTS Cape CoralCape CoralFL
368
5,448

368
5,448
5,816
1,229
4,587
1984201134 years
RTS EnglewoodEnglewoodFL
1,071
3,516

1,071
3,516
4,587
851
3,736
1992201135 years
RTS Ft. MyersFort MyersFL
1,153
4,127

1,153
4,127
5,280
1,117
4,163
1989201131 years
RTS Key WestKey WestFL
486
4,380

486
4,380
4,866
880
3,986
1987201135 years
JFK Medical PlazaLake WorthFL
453
1,711
303
453
2,014
2,467
799
1,668
1999200435 years
East Pointe Medical PlazaLehigh AcresFL
327
11,816

327
11,816
12,143
1,210
10,933
1994201535 years
Palms West Building 6LoxahatcheeFL
965
2,678
156
965
2,834
3,799
1,094
2,705
2000200435 years
Bay Medical PlazaLynn HavenFL
4,215
15,041
3
4,215
15,044
19,259
1,771
17,488
2003201535 years
Aventura Heart & HealthMiamiFL15,023

25,361
3,030

28,391
28,391
11,656
16,735
2006200735 years
RTS NaplesNaplesFL
1,152
3,726

1,152
3,726
4,878
851
4,027
1999201135 years
Bay Medical CenterPanama CityFL
82
17,400
3
82
17,403
17,485
1,779
15,706
1987201535 years
Woodlands Center for Specialized MedPensacolaFL14,073
2,518
24,006
30
2,518
24,036
26,554
5,399
21,155
2009201235 years
RTS Pt. CharlottePt CharlotteFL
966
4,581

966
4,581
5,547
1,097
4,450
1985201134 years
RTS SarasotaSarasotaFL
1,914
3,889

1,914
3,889
5,803
982
4,821
1996201135 years
Capital Regional MOB ITallahasseeFL
590
8,773
59
590
8,832
9,422
812
8,610
1998201535 years
University Medical Office BuildingTamaracFL

6,690
393
5
7,078
7,083
2,755
4,328
2006200735 years
RTS VeniceVeniceFL
1,536
4,104

1,536
4,104
5,640
997
4,643
1997201135 years
Athens Medical ComplexAthensGA
2,826
18,339
7
2,826
18,346
21,172
1,957
19,215
2011201535 years
Doctors Center at St. Joseph's HospitalAtlantaGA
545
80,152
4,735
545
84,887
85,432
10,025
75,407
1978201520 years
Augusta POB IAugustaGA
233
7,894
1,479
233
9,373
9,606
4,403
5,203
1978201214 years
Augusta POB IIAugustaGA
735
13,717
1,049
735
14,766
15,501
5,024
10,477
1987201223 years
Augusta POB IIIAugustaGA
535
3,857
664
535
4,521
5,056
1,845
3,211
1994201222 years
Augusta POB IVAugustaGA
675
2,182
2,115
691
4,281
4,972
1,519
3,453
1995201223 years
Cobb Physicians CenterAustellGA
1,145
16,805
1,228
1,145
18,033
19,178
5,249
13,929
1992201135 years
Summit Professional Plaza IBrunswickGA
1,821
2,974
124
1,821
3,098
4,919
3,016
1,903
2004201231 years
Summit Professional Plaza IIBrunswickGA
981
13,818
33
981
13,851
14,832
3,380
11,452
1998201235 years
Fayette MOBFayettevilleGA
895
20,669
372
895
21,041
21,936
2,164
19,772
2004201535 years
Woodlawn Commons 1121/1163MariettaGA
5,495
16,028
1,150
5,540
17,133
22,673
1,872
20,801
1991201535 years
PAPP ClinicNewnanGA
2,167
5,477
68
2,167
5,545
7,712
851
6,861
1994201530 years
Parkway Physicians CenterRinggoldGA
476
10,017
668
476
10,685
11,161
3,018
8,143
2004201135 years
Riverdale MOBRiverdaleGA
1,025
9,783
15
1,025
9,798
10,823
1,161
9,662
2005201535 years

 Location Initial Cost to CompanyGross Amount Carried at Close of Period   
Property NameCityState /
Province
EncumbrancesLand and
Improvements
Buildings and
Improvements
Costs
Capitalized
Subsequent
to Acquisition1
Land and
Improvements
Buildings and
Improvements
TotalAccumulated
Depreciation
NBVYear of
Construction
Year
Acquired
Life on
Which
Depreciation
in Income
Statement
is Computed
575 W Hay BuildingDecaturIL111 739 24 111 763 874 358 516 1984201035 years
Good Samaritan Physician Office Building IDowners GroveIL407 10,337 1,397 407 11,734 12,141 3,211 8,930 1976201335 years
Good Samaritan Physician Office Building IIDowners GroveIL1,013 25,370 1,101 1,013 26,471 27,484 6,780 20,704 1995201335 years
Eberle Medical Office Building ("Eberle MOB")Elk Grove VillageIL16,315 1,017 17,332 17,332 7,872 9,460 2005200935 years
1425 Hunt Club Road MOBGurneeIL249 1,452 976 352 2,325 2,677 1,086 1,591 2005201134 years
1445 Hunt Club DriveGurneeIL216 1,405 609 325 1,905 2,230 1,039 1,191 2002201131 years
Gurnee Imaging CenterGurneeIL82 2,731 82 2,731 2,813 926 1,887 2002201135 years
Gurnee Center ClubGurneeIL627 17,851 627 17,851 18,478 6,169 12,309 2001201135 years
South Suburban Hospital Physician Office BuildingHazel CrestIL191 4,370 997 191 5,367 5,558 1,608 3,950 1989201335 years
755 Milwaukee MOBLibertyvilleIL421 3,716 3,386 630 6,893 7,523 3,942 3,581 1990201118 years
890 Professional MOBLibertyvilleIL214 2,630 977 214 3,607 3,821 1,548 2,273 1980201126 years
Libertyville Center ClubLibertyvilleIL1,020 17,176 1,020 17,176 18,196 6,301 11,895 1988201135 years
Christ Medical Center Physician Office BuildingOak LawnIL658 16,421 3,663 658 20,084 20,742 4,626 16,116 1986201335 years
Methodist North MOBPeoriaIL1,025 29,493 31 1,025 29,524 30,549 6,238 24,311 2010201535 years
Davita Dialysis - RockfordRockfordIL256 2,543 256 2,543 2,799 634 2,165 2009201535 years
Vernon Hills Acute Care CenterVernon HillsIL3,376 694 (2,101)1,195 774 1,969 921 1,048 1986201115 years
Wilbur S. Roby BuildingAndersonIN2,653 1,340 3,993 3,993 2,072 1,921 1992201035 years
Ambulatory Services BuildingAndersonIN4,266 2,129 6,395 6,395 3,297 3,098 1995201035 years
St. John's Medical Arts BuildingAndersonIN2,281 2,114 4,395 4,395 2,121 2,274 1973201035 years
Carmel ICarmelIN466 5,954 833 466 6,787 7,253 2,809 4,444 1985201230 years
Carmel IICarmelIN455 5,976 1,321 455 7,297 7,752 2,686 5,066 1989201233 years
Carmel IIICarmelIN422 6,194 1,039 422 7,233 7,655 2,594 5,061 2001201235 years
ElkhartElkhartIN1,256 1,973 1,256 1,973 3,229 1,595 1,634 1994201132 years
Lutheran Medical ArtsFort WayneIN702 13,576 169 714 13,733 14,447 2,886 11,561 2000201535 years
Dupont Road MOBFort WayneIN633 13,479 507 672 13,947 14,619 3,164 11,455 2001201535 years
Harcourt Professional Office BuildingIndianapolisIN519 28,951 6,023 519 34,974 35,493 12,290 23,203 1973201228 years
Cardiac Professional Office BuildingIndianapolisIN498 27,430 3,048 498 30,478 30,976 8,997 21,979 1995201235 years
Oncology Medical Office BuildingIndianapolisIN470 5,703 2,598 470 8,301 8,771 2,328 6,443 2003201235 years
CorVasc Medical Office BuildingIndianapolisIN514 9,617 549 871 9,809 10,680 1,714 8,966 2004201636 years
St. Francis South Medical Office BuildingIndianapolisIN20,649 2,225 22,867 22,874 5,957 16,917 1995201335 years
Methodist Professional Center IIndianapolisIN61 37,411 7,415 61 44,826 44,887 16,914 27,973 1985201225 years
Indiana Orthopedic Center of ExcellenceIndianapolisIN967 83,746 3,106 967 86,852 87,819 15,254 72,565 1997201535 years
United Healthcare - IndyIndianapolisIN5,737 32,116 848 5,737 32,964 38,701 7,300 31,401 1988201535 years
LaPorteLa PorteIN553 1,309 553 1,309 1,862 683 1,179 1997201134 years
MishawakaMishawakaIN3,787 5,543 3,787 5,543 9,330 4,657 4,673 1993201135 years
Cancer Care PartnersMishawakaIN3,162 28,633 220 3,162 28,853 32,015 5,901 26,114 2010201535 years
Michiana OncologyMishawakaIN4,577 20,939 15 4,581 20,950 25,531 4,527 21,004 2010201535 years
147


 Location Initial Cost to Company Gross Amount Carried at Close of Period      
Property NameCity
State /
Province
Encumbrances
Land and
Improvements
Buildings and
Improvements
Costs
Capitalized
Subsequent
to Acquisition
Land and
Improvements
Buildings and
Improvements
Total
Accumulated
Depreciation
NBV
Year of
Construction
Year
Acquired
Life on
Which
Depreciation
in Income
Statement
is Computed
Rush Copley POB IAuroraIL
120
27,882
449
120
28,331
28,451
2,927
25,524
1996201534 years
Rush Copley POB IIAuroraIL
49
27,217
457
49
27,674
27,723
2,785
24,938
2009201535 years
Good Shepherd Physician Office Building IBarringtonIL
152
3,224
227
152
3,451
3,603
521
3,082
1979201335 years
Good Shepherd Physician Office Building IIBarringtonIL
512
12,977
438
512
13,415
13,927
2,092
11,835
1996201335 years
Trinity Hospital Physician Office BuildingChicagoIL
139
3,329
1,121
139
4,450
4,589
656
3,933
1971201335 years
Advocate Beverly CenterChicagoIL
2,227
10,140
14
2,231
10,150
12,381
1,578
10,803
1986201525 years
Crystal Lakes Medical ArtsCrystal LakeIL
2,490
19,504
42
2,523
19,513
22,036
2,237
19,799
2007201535 years
Advocate Good ShepherdCrystal LakeIL
2,444
10,953
112
2,444
11,065
13,509
1,452
12,057
2008201533 years
Physicians Plaza EastDecaturIL

791
1,894

2,685
2,685
756
1,929
1976201035 years
Physicians Plaza WestDecaturIL

1,943
597

2,540
2,540
938
1,602
1987201035 years
SIU Family PracticeDecaturIL

3,900
3,773

7,673
7,673
1,951
5,722
1996201035 years
304 W Hay BuildingDecaturIL

8,702
615
29
9,288
9,317
2,753
6,564
2002201035 years
302 W Hay BuildingDecaturIL

3,467
444

3,911
3,911
1,384
2,527
1993201035 years
ENTADecaturIL

1,150
16

1,166
1,166
415
751
1996201035 years
301 W Hay BuildingDecaturIL

640


640
640
319
321
1980201035 years
South Shore Medical BuildingDecaturIL
902
129
56
958
129
1,087
198
889
1991201035 years
Kenwood Medical CenterDecaturIL

1,689
1,505

3,194
3,194
661
2,533
1997201035 years
Corporate Health ServicesDecaturIL
934
1,386

934
1,386
2,320
614
1,706
1996201035 years
Rock Springs MedicalDecaturIL
399
495

399
495
894
234
660
1990201035 years
575 W Hay BuildingDecaturIL
111
739
24
111
763
874
293
581
1984201035 years
Good Samaritan Physician Office Building IDowners GroveIL
407
10,337
791
407
11,128
11,535
1,645
9,890
1976201335 years
Good Samaritan Physician Office Building IIDowners GroveIL
1,013
25,370
785
1,013
26,155
27,168
3,922
23,246
1995201335 years
Eberle Medical Office Building ("Eberle MOB")Elk Grove VillageIL

16,315
404

16,719
16,719
6,415
10,304
2005200935 years
1425 Hunt Club Road MOBGurneeIL
249
1,452
824
249
2,276
2,525
592
1,933
2005201134 years
1445 Hunt Club DriveGurneeIL
216
1,405
353
216
1,758
1,974
783
1,191
2002201131 years
Gurnee Imaging CenterGurneeIL
82
2,731

82
2,731
2,813
655
2,158
2002201135 years
Gurnee Center ClubGurneeIL
627
17,851

627
17,851
18,478
4,497
13,981
2001201135 years
South Suburban Hospital Physician Office BuildingHazel CrestIL
191
4,370
225
191
4,595
4,786
779
4,007
1989201335 years
755 Milwaukee MOBLibertyvilleIL
421
3,716
1,665
630
5,172
5,802
2,672
3,130
1990201118 years
890 Professional MOBLibertyvilleIL
214
2,630
276
214
2,906
3,120
1,018
2,102
1980201126 years
Libertyville Center ClubLibertyvilleIL
1,020
17,176

1,020
17,176
18,196
4,445
13,751
1988201135 years
Christ Medical Center Physician Office BuildingOak LawnIL
658
16,421
1,066
658
17,487
18,145
2,487
15,658
1986201335 years
Methodist North MOBPeoriaIL
1,025
29,493

1,025
29,493
30,518
3,071
27,447
2010201535 years
Davita Dialysis - RockfordRockfordIL
256
2,543

256
2,543
2,799
312
2,487
2009201535 years
Round Lake ACCRound LakeIL
758
370
378
799
707
1,506
551
955
1984201113 years
Vernon Hills Acute Care CenterVernon HillsIL
3,376
694
264
3,413
921
4,334
668
3,666
1986201115 years
Wilbur S. Roby BuildingAndersonIN

2,653
870

3,523
3,523
1,397
2,126
1992201035 years

 Location Initial Cost to CompanyGross Amount Carried at Close of Period   
Property NameCityState /
Province
EncumbrancesLand and
Improvements
Buildings and
Improvements
Costs
Capitalized
Subsequent
to Acquisition1
Land and
Improvements
Buildings and
Improvements
TotalAccumulated
Depreciation
NBVYear of
Construction
Year
Acquired
Life on
Which
Depreciation
in Income
Statement
is Computed
DaVita Dialysis - PaoliPaoliIN396 2,056 396 2,056 2,452 524 1,928 2011201535 years
South BendSouth BendIN792 2,530 792 2,530 3,322 1,085 2,237 1996201134 years
OLBH Same Day Surgery Center MOBAshlandKY101 19,066 3,569 101 22,635 22,736 7,320 15,416 1997201226 years
St. Elizabeth CovingtonCovingtonKY345 12,790 166 345 12,956 13,301 4,413 8,888 2009201235 years
Jefferson ClinicLouisvilleKY673 2,018 2,691 2,691 493 2,198 2013201335 years
East Jefferson Medical PlazaMetairieLA168 17,264 3,162 168 20,426 20,594 8,520 12,074 1996201232 years
East Jefferson MOBMetairieLA107 15,137 4,016 107 19,153 19,260 7,311 11,949 1985201228 years
East Jefferson MRIMetairieLACIPCIPCIP
Lakeside POB IMetairieLA3,334 4,974 803 342 8,769 9,111 5,296 3,815 1986201122 years
Lakeside POB IIMetairieLA1,046 802 (156)53 1,639 1,692 1,316 376 198020117 years
Fresenius MedicalMetairieLA1,195 3,797 84 1,269 3,807 5,076 874 4,202 2012201535 years
RTS BerlinBerlinMD2,216 2,216 2,216 783 1,433 1994201129 years
Charles O. Fisher Medical BuildingWestminsterMD10,205 13,795 1,888 15,683 15,683 8,018 7,665 2009200935 years
Medical Specialties BuildingKalamazooMI19,242 1,689 20,931 20,931 7,640 13,291 1989201035 years
North Professional BuildingKalamazooMI7,228 1,969 9,197 9,197 4,013 5,184 1983201035 years
Borgess Navigation CenterKalamazooMI2,391 302 2,693 2,693 884 1,809 1976201035 years
Borgess Health & Fitness CenterKalamazooMI11,959 655 12,614 12,614 4,667 7,947 1984201035 years
Heart Center BuildingKalamazooMI8,420 940 176 9,184 9,360 3,680 5,680 1980201035 years
Medical Commons BuildingKalamazoo TownshipMI661 671 1,332 1,332 816 516 1979201035 years
RTS Madison HeightsMadison HeightsMI401 2,946 401 2,946 3,347 999 2,348 2002201135 years
Bronson Lakeview OPCPaw PawMI3,835 31,564 3,835 31,564 35,399 7,361 28,038 2006201535 years
Pro Med Center PlainwellPlainwellMI697 28 725 725 282 443 1991201035 years
Pro Med Center RichlandRichlandMI233 2,267 334 325 2,509 2,834 880 1,954 1996201035 years
Henry Ford Dialysis CenterSouthfieldMI589 3,350 589 3,350 3,939 773 3,166 2002201535 years
Metro HealthWyomingMI1,325 5,479 1,325 5,479 6,804 1,338 5,466 2008201535 years
Spectrum HealthWyomingMI2,463 14,353 2,463 14,353 16,816 3,504 13,312 2006201535 years
Cogdell Duluth MOBDuluthMN33,406 (19)33,387 33,387 8,024 25,363 2012201235 years
Allina HealthElk RiverMN1,442 7,742 122 1,455 7,851 9,306 2,363 6,943 2002201535 years
Unitron HearingPlymouthMN2,646 8,962 2,646 8,967 11,613 3,065 8,548 2011201529 years
HealthPartners Medical & Dental ClinicsSartellMN2,492 15,694 413 2,503 16,096 18,599 5,658 12,941 2010201235 years
University Physicians - Grants FerryFlowoodMS2,796 12,125 (12)2,796 12,113 14,909 4,388 10,521 2010201235 years
Arnold Urgent CareArnoldMO1,058 556 413 1,097 930 2,027 663 1,364 1999201135 years
DePaul Health Center NorthBridgetonMO996 10,045 3,681 996 13,726 14,722 7,113 7,609 1976201221 years
DePaul Health Center SouthBridgetonMO910 12,169 2,838 910 15,007 15,917 5,977 9,940 1992201230 years
St. Mary's Health Center MOB DClaytonMO103 2,780 1,622 106 4,399 4,505 2,268 2,237 1984201222 years
Fenton Urgent Care CenterFentonMO183 2,714 404 189 3,112 3,301 1,456 1,845 2003201135 years
Broadway Medical Office BuildingKansas CityMO1,300 12,602 11,591 1,385 24,108 25,493 9,296 16,197 1976200735 years
St. Joseph Medical BuildingKansas CityMO305 7,445 2,750 305 10,195 10,500 3,178 7,322 1988201232 years
148


 Location Initial Cost to Company Gross Amount Carried at Close of Period      
Property NameCity
State /
Province
Encumbrances
Land and
Improvements
Buildings and
Improvements
Costs
Capitalized
Subsequent
to Acquisition
Land and
Improvements
Buildings and
Improvements
Total
Accumulated
Depreciation
NBV
Year of
Construction
Year
Acquired
Life on
Which
Depreciation
in Income
Statement
is Computed
Ambulatory Services BuildingAndersonIN

4,266
1,733

5,999
5,999
2,271
3,728
1995201035 years
St. John's Medical Arts BuildingAndersonIN

2,281
1,450

3,731
3,731
1,148
2,583
1973201035 years
Carmel ICarmelIN
466
5,954
610
466
6,564
7,030
1,831
5,199
1985201230 years
Carmel IICarmelIN
455
5,976
704
455
6,680
7,135
1,644
5,491
1989201233 years
Carmel IIICarmelIN
422
6,194
662
422
6,856
7,278
1,551
5,727
2001201235 years
ElkhartElkhartIN
1,256
1,973

1,256
1,973
3,229
1,111
2,118
1994201132 years
Lutheran Medical ArtsFort WayneIN
702
13,576
47
702
13,623
14,325
1,481
12,844
2000201535 years
Dupont Road MOBFort WayneIN
633
13,479
154
672
13,594
14,266
1,583
12,683
2001201535 years
Harcourt Professional Office BuildingIndianapolisIN
519
28,951
2,419
519
31,370
31,889
8,030
23,859
1973201228 years
Cardiac Professional Office BuildingIndianapolisIN
498
27,430
1,128
498
28,558
29,056
5,919
23,137
1995201235 years
Oncology Medical Office BuildingIndianapolisIN
470
5,703
230
470
5,933
6,403
1,642
4,761
2003201235 years
CorVasc Medical Office BuildingIndianapolisIN
514
9,617
14
514
9,631
10,145
562
9,583
2004201636 years
St. Francis South Medical Office BuildingIndianapolisIN

20,649
1,121

21,770
21,770
3,602
18,168
1995201335 years
Methodist Professional Center IIndianapolisIN
61
37,411
5,219
61
42,630
42,691
10,467
32,224
1985201225 years
Indiana Orthopedic Center of ExcellenceIndianapolisIN
967
83,746
3,106
967
86,852
87,819
6,453
81,366
1997201535 years
United Healthcare - IndyIndianapolisIN
5,737
32,116

5,737
32,116
37,853
3,599
34,254
1988201535 years
LaPorteLa PorteIN
553
1,309

553
1,309
1,862
479
1,383
1997201134 years
MishawakaMishawakaIN
3,787
5,543

3,787
5,543
9,330
3,242
6,088
1993201135 years
Cancer Care PartnersMishawakaIN
3,162
28,633

3,162
28,633
31,795
2,909
28,886
2010201535 years
Michiana OncologyMishawakaIN
4,577
20,939
4
4,581
20,939
25,520
2,228
23,292
2010201535 years
DaVita Dialysis - PaoliPaoliIN
396
2,056

396
2,056
2,452
258
2,194
2011201535 years
South BendSouth BendIN
792
2,530

792
2,530
3,322
766
2,556
1996201134 years
Via Christi ClinicWichitaKS
1,883
7,428

1,883
7,428
9,311
922
8,389
2006201535 years
OLBH Same Day Surgery Center MOBAshlandKY
101
19,066
608
101
19,674
19,775
4,819
14,956
1997201226 years
St. Elizabeth CovingtonCovingtonKY
345
12,790
33
345
12,823
13,168
2,887
10,281
2009201235 years
St. Elizabeth Florence MOBFlorenceKY
402
8,279
1,439
402
9,718
10,120
2,640
7,480
2005201235 years
Jefferson ClinicLouisvilleKY

673
2,018

2,691
2,691
263
2,428
2013201335 years
East Jefferson Medical PlazaMetairieLA
168
17,264
2,197
168
19,461
19,629
6,008
13,621
1996201232 years
East Jefferson MOBMetairieLA
107
15,137
2,283
107
17,420
17,527
4,758
12,769
1985201228 years
Lakeside POB IMetairieLA
3,334
4,974
3,198
3,334
8,172
11,506
3,279
8,227
1986201122 years
Lakeside POB IIMetairieLA
1,046
802
547
1,046
1,349
2,395
931
1,464
198020117 years
Fresenius MedicalMetairieLA
1,195
3,797

1,195
3,797
4,992
427
4,565
2012201535 years
RTS BerlinBerlinMD

2,216


2,216
2,216
546
1,670
1994201129 years
Charles O. Fisher Medical BuildingWestminsterMD10,943

13,795
1,768

15,563
15,563
6,459
9,104
2009200935 years
Medical Specialties BuildingKalamazooMI

19,242
1,508

20,750
20,750
5,621
15,129
1989201035 years
North Professional BuildingKalamazooMI

7,228
1,633

8,861
8,861
3,001
5,860
1983201035 years
Borgess Navigation CenterKalamazooMI

2,391


2,391
2,391
694
1,697
1976201035 years
Borgess Health & Fitness CenterKalamazooMI

11,959
603

12,562
12,562
3,594
8,968
1984201035 years
Heart Center BuildingKalamazooMI

8,420
440
10
8,850
8,860
2,876
5,984
1980201035 years

 Location Initial Cost to CompanyGross Amount Carried at Close of Period   
Property NameCityState /
Province
EncumbrancesLand and
Improvements
Buildings and
Improvements
Costs
Capitalized
Subsequent
to Acquisition1
Land and
Improvements
Buildings and
Improvements
TotalAccumulated
Depreciation
NBVYear of
Construction
Year
Acquired
Life on
Which
Depreciation
in Income
Statement
is Computed
St. Joseph Medical MallKansas CityMO530 9,115 773 530 9,888 10,418 3,549 6,869 1995201233 years
Carondelet Medical BuildingKansas CityMO745 12,437 3,967 745 16,404 17,149 6,521 10,628 1979201229 years
St. Joseph Hospital West Medical Office Building IILake Saint LouisMO524 3,229 1,036 524 4,265 4,789 1,781 3,008 2005201235 years
St. Joseph O'Fallon Medical Office BuildingO'FallonMO940 5,556 493 1,060 5,929 6,989 2,054 4,935 1992201235 years
Sisters of Mercy BuildingSpringfieldMO3,427 8,697 3,427 8,697 12,124 2,259 9,865 2008201535 years
St. Joseph Health Center Medical Building 1St. CharlesMO503 4,336 1,865 503 6,201 6,704 3,336 3,368 1987201220 years
St. Joseph Health Center Medical Building 2St. CharlesMO369 2,963 1,665 369 4,628 4,997 2,149 2,848 1999201232 years
Physicians Office CenterSt. LouisMO1,445 13,825 1,117 1,445 14,942 16,387 7,011 9,376 2003201135 years
12700 Southford Road Medical PlazaSt. LouisMO595 12,584 3,039 595 15,623 16,218 6,734 9,484 1993201132 years
Mercy South MOB ASt. LouisMO409 4,687 2,129 409 6,816 7,225 3,717 3,508 1975201120 years
Mercy South MOB BSt. LouisMO350 3,942 1,502 350 5,444 5,794 3,147 2,647 1980201121 years
Lemay Urgent Care CenterSt. LouisMO2,317 3,120 (607)2,355 2,475 4,830 2,418 2,412 1983201122 years
St. Mary's Health Center MOB BSt. LouisMO119 4,161 12,660 119 16,821 16,940 4,312 12,628 1979201223 years
St. Mary's Health Center MOB CSt. LouisMO136 6,018 4,390 256 10,288 10,544 3,700 6,844 1969201220 years
Carson Tahoe Specialty Medical CenterCarson CityNV2,748 27,010 4,297 2,898 31,157 34,055 7,100 26,955 1981201535 years
Carson Tahoe MOB WestCarson CityNV802 11,855 229 703 12,183 12,886 2,739 10,147 2007201529 years
Del E Webb Medical PlazaHendersonNV1,028 16,993 2,878 1,028 19,871 20,899 7,784 13,115 1999201135 years
Durango Medical PlazaLas VegasNV3,787 27,738 (1,709)3,683 26,133 29,816 5,644 24,172 2008201535 years
The Terrace at South MeadowsRenoNV6,270 504 9,966 874 517 10,827 11,344 4,276 7,068 2004201135 years
Cooper Health MOB IWillingboroNJ1,389 2,742 134 1,398 2,867 4,265 828 3,437 2010201535 years
Cooper Health MOB IIWillingboroNJ594 5,638 65 594 5,703 6,297 1,246 5,051 2012201535 years
Salem MedicalWoodstownNJ275 4,132 23 275 4,155 4,430 894 3,536 2010201535 years
Albany Medical Center MOBAlbanyNY321 18,389 35 356 18,389 18,745 3,406 15,339 2010201535 years
St. Peter's Recovery CenterGuilderlandNY1,059 9,156 1,059 9,156 10,215 2,287 7,928 1990201535 years
Central NY Medical CenterSyracuseNY1,786 26,101 5,075 1,792 31,170 32,962 10,709 22,253 1997201233 years
Northcountry MOBWatertownNY1,320 10,799 444 1,364 11,199 12,563 2,686 9,877 2001201535 years
RandolphCharlotteNC6,370 2,929 2,694 6,442 5,551 11,993 4,711 7,282 197320124 years
Mallard Crossing ICharlotteNC3,229 2,072 944 3,269 2,976 6,245 2,313 3,932 1997201225 years
Medical Arts BuildingConcordNC701 11,734 1,977 701 13,711 14,412 5,602 8,810 1997201231 years
Gateway Medical Office BuildingConcordNC1,100 9,904 724 1,100 10,628 11,728 4,508 7,220 2005201235 years
Copperfield Medical MallConcordNC1,980 2,846 664 2,139 3,351 5,490 2,116 3,374 1989201225 years
Weddington Internal & Pediatric MedicineConcordNC574 688 37 574 725 1,299 438 861 2000201227 years
Rex Wellness CenterGarnerNC1,348 5,330 444 1,354 5,768 7,122 1,670 5,452 2003201534 years
Gaston Professional CenterGastoniaNC833 24,885 3,249 863 28,104 28,967 9,264 19,703 1997201235 years
Harrisburg Family PhysiciansHarrisburgNC679 1,646 73 679 1,719 2,398 710 1,688 1996201235 years
Harrisburg Medical MallHarrisburgNC1,339 2,292 342 1,339 2,634 3,973 1,462 2,511 1997201227 years
NorthcrossHuntersvilleNC623 278 231 623 509 1,132 348 784 1993201222 years
REX Knightdale MOB & Wellness CenterKnightdaleNC22,823 1,003 50 23,776 23,826 6,077 17,749 2009201235 years
149


 Location Initial Cost to Company Gross Amount Carried at Close of Period      
Property NameCity
State /
Province
Encumbrances
Land and
Improvements
Buildings and
Improvements
Costs
Capitalized
Subsequent
to Acquisition
Land and
Improvements
Buildings and
Improvements
Total
Accumulated
Depreciation
NBV
Year of
Construction
Year
Acquired
Life on
Which
Depreciation
in Income
Statement
is Computed
Medical Commons BuildingKalamazoo TownshipMI

661
644

1,305
1,305
445
860
1979201035 years
RTS Madison HeightsMadison HeightsMI
401
2,946

401
2,946
3,347
698
2,649
2002201135 years
RTS MonroeMonroeMI
281
3,450

281
3,450
3,731
917
2,814
1997201131 years
Bronson Lakeview OPCPaw PawMI
3,835
31,564

3,835
31,564
35,399
3,629
31,770
2006201535 years
Pro Med Center PlainwellPlainwellMI

697
7

704
704
223
481
1991201035 years
Pro Med Center RichlandRichlandMI
233
2,267
77
233
2,344
2,577
658
1,919
1996201035 years
Henry Ford Dialysis CenterSouthfieldMI
589
3,350

589
3,350
3,939
381
3,558
2002201535 years
Metro HealthWyomingMI
1,325
5,479

1,325
5,479
6,804
659
6,145
2008201535 years
Spectrum HealthWyomingMI
2,463
14,353

2,463
14,353
16,816
1,727
15,089
2006201535 years
Cogdell Duluth MOBDuluthMN

33,406
(19)
33,387
33,387
5,162
28,225
2012201235 years
Allina HealthElk RiverMN
1,442
7,742
54
1,442
7,796
9,238
1,058
8,180
2002201535 years
Unitron HearingPlymouthMN
2,646
8,962
5
2,646
8,967
11,613
1,511
10,102
2011201529 years
HealthPartners Medical & Dental ClinicsSartellMN
2,492
15,694
49
2,503
15,732
18,235
3,787
14,448
2010201235 years
Arnold Urgent CareArnoldMO
1,058
556
155
1,097
672
1,769
520
1,249
1999201135 years
DePaul Health Center NorthBridgetonMO
996
10,045
2,189
996
12,234
13,230
4,310
8,920
1976201221 years
DePaul Health Center SouthBridgetonMO
910
12,169
1,403
910
13,572
14,482
3,757
10,725
1992201230 years
St. Mary's Health Center MOB DClaytonMO
103
2,780
925
103
3,705
3,808
1,415
2,393
1984201222 years
Fenton Urgent Care CenterFentonMO
183
2,714
364
189
3,072
3,261
1,091
2,170
2003201135 years
St. Joseph Medical BuildingKansas CityMO
305
7,445
2,286
305
9,731
10,036
2,005
8,031
1988201232 years
St. Joseph Medical MallKansas CityMO
530
9,115
608
530
9,723
10,253
2,327
7,926
1995201233 years
Carondelet Medical BuildingKansas CityMO
745
12,437
1,800
745
14,237
14,982
3,698
11,284
1979201229 years
St. Joseph Hospital West Medical Office Building IILake Saint LouisMO
524
3,229
779
524
4,008
4,532
1,046
3,486
2005201235 years
St. Joseph O'Fallon Medical Office BuildingO'FallonMO
940
5,556
114
960
5,650
6,610
1,336
5,274
1992201235 years
Sisters of Mercy BuildingSpringfieldMO
3,427
8,697

3,427
8,697
12,124
1,113
11,011
2008201535 years
St. Joseph Health Center Medical Building 1St. CharlesMO
503
4,336
1,220
503
5,556
6,059
2,010
4,049
1987201220 years
St. Joseph Health Center Medical Building 2St. CharlesMO
369
2,963
1,256
369
4,219
4,588
1,111
3,477
1999201232 years
Physicians Office CenterSt. LouisMO
1,445
13,825
858
1,445
14,683
16,128
5,147
10,981
2003201135 years
12700 Southford Road Medical PlazaSt. LouisMO
595
12,584
1,607
595
14,191
14,786
4,800
9,986
1993201132 years
St Anthony's MOB ASt. LouisMO
409
4,687
1,369
409
6,056
6,465
2,447
4,018
1975201120 years
St Anthony's MOB BSt. LouisMO
350
3,942
923
350
4,865
5,215
2,159
3,056
1980201121 years
Lemay Urgent Care CenterSt. LouisMO
2,317
3,120
635
2,351
3,721
6,072
1,820
4,252
1983201122 years
St. Mary's Health Center MOB BSt. LouisMO
119
4,161
11,075
119
15,236
15,355
1,654
13,701
1979201223 years
St. Mary's Health Center MOB CSt. LouisMO
136
6,018
992
136
7,010
7,146
2,127
5,019
1969201220 years
University Physicians - Grants FerryFlowoodMS8,815
2,796
12,125
(12)2,796
12,113
14,909
2,947
11,962
2010201235 years
RandolphCharlotteNC
6,370
2,929
1,893
6,418
4,774
11,192
3,434
7,758
197320124 years
Mallard Crossing ICharlotteNC
3,229
2,072
673
3,269
2,705
5,974
1,703
4,271
1997201225 years
Medical Arts BuildingConcordNC
701
11,734
1,051
701
12,785
13,486
3,924
9,562
1997201231 years

 Location Initial Cost to CompanyGross Amount Carried at Close of Period   
Property NameCityState /
Province
EncumbrancesLand and
Improvements
Buildings and
Improvements
Costs
Capitalized
Subsequent
to Acquisition1
Land and
Improvements
Buildings and
Improvements
TotalAccumulated
Depreciation
NBVYear of
Construction
Year
Acquired
Life on
Which
Depreciation
in Income
Statement
is Computed
Midland Medical ParkMidlandNC1,221 847 132 1,233 967 2,200 703 1,497 1998201225 years
East Rocky Mount Kidney CenterRocky MountNC803 998 34 805 1,030 1,835 521 1,314 2000201233 years
Rocky Mount Kidney CenterRocky MountNC479 1,297 60 479 1,357 1,836 711 1,125 1990201225 years
Rocky Mount Medical ParkRocky MountNC2,552 7,779 2,774 2,652 10,453 13,105 4,587 8,518 1991201230 years
Trinity Health Medical Arts ClinicMinotND935 15,482 715 951 16,181 17,132 4,707 12,425 1995201526 years
Anderson Medical Arts Building ICincinnatiOH9,632 2,366 146 11,852 11,998 5,811 6,187 1984200735 years
Anderson Medical Arts Building IICincinnatiOH15,123 3,930 19,053 19,053 8,521 10,532 2007200735 years
Riverside North Medical Office BuildingColumbusOH785 8,519 2,050 785 10,569 11,354 5,224 6,130 1962201225 years
Riverside South Medical Office BuildingColumbusOH586 7,298 997 610 8,271 8,881 3,880 5,001 1985201227 years
340 East Town Medical Office BuildingColumbusOH10 9,443 1,353 10 10,796 10,806 4,118 6,688 1984201229 years
393 East Town Medical Office BuildingColumbusOH61 4,760 780 61 5,540 5,601 2,637 2,964 1970201220 years
141 South Sixth Medical Office BuildingColumbusOH80 1,113 2,923 80 4,036 4,116 1,175 2,941 1971201214 years
Doctors West Medical Office BuildingColumbusOH414 5,362 884 414 6,246 6,660 2,475 4,185 1998201235 years
Eastside Health CenterColumbusOH956 3,472 (2)956 3,470 4,426 2,435 1,991 1977201215 years
East Main Medical Office BuildingColumbusOH440 4,771 72 440 4,843 5,283 1,859 3,424 2006201235 years
Heart Center Medical Office BuildingColumbusOH1,063 12,140 923 1,063 13,063 14,126 4,988 9,138 2004201235 years
Wilkins Medical Office BuildingColumbusOH123 18,062 2,302 123 20,364 20,487 5,639 14,848 2002201235 years
Grady Medical Office BuildingDelawareOH239 2,263 724 239 2,987 3,226 1,388 1,838 1991201225 years
Dublin Northwest Medical Office BuildingDublinOH342 3,278 376 354 3,642 3,996 1,610 2,386 2001201234 years
Preserve III Medical Office BuildingDublinOH2,449 7,025 1,211 2,449 8,236 10,685 3,581 7,104 2006201235 years
Zanesville Surgery CenterZanesvilleOH172 9,403 69 241 9,403 9,644 2,981 6,663 2000201135 years
Dialysis CenterZanesvilleOH534 855 138 534 993 1,527 706 821 1960201121 years
Genesis Children's CenterZanesvilleOH538 3,781 538 3,781 4,319 1,606 2,713 2006201130 years
Medical Arts Building IZanesvilleOH429 2,405 674 444 3,064 3,508 1,774 1,734 1970201120 years
Medical Arts Building IIZanesvilleOH485 6,013 1,715 545 7,668 8,213 3,931 4,282 1995201125 years
Medical Arts Building IIIZanesvilleOH94 1,248 94 1,248 1,342 659 683 1970201125 years
Primecare BuildingZanesvilleOH130 1,344 648 130 1,992 2,122 1,197 925 1978201120 years
Outpatient Rehabilitation BuildingZanesvilleOH82 1,541 82 1,541 1,623 704 919 1985201128 years
Radiation Oncology BuildingZanesvilleOH105 1,201 952 114 2,144 2,258 661 1,597 1988201125 years
HealthplexZanesvilleOH2,488 15,849 1,199 2,649 16,887 19,536 7,407 12,129 1990201132 years
Physicians PavilionZanesvilleOH422 6,297 1,722 422 8,019 8,441 4,022 4,419 1990201125 years
Zanesville Northside PharmacyZanesvilleOH42 635 42 635 677 299 378 1985201128 years
Bethesda Campus MOB IIIZanesvilleOH188 1,137 308 222 1,411 1,633 700 933 1978201125 years
Tuality 7th Avenue Medical PlazaHillsboroOR17,194 1,516 24,638 1,516 1,546 26,124 27,670 9,752 17,918 2003201135 years
Professional Office Building IChesterPA6,283 3,906 10,189 10,189 5,512 4,677 1978200430 years
DCMH Medical Office BuildingDrexel HillPA10,424 3,268 13,692 13,692 7,630 6,062 1984200430 years
Pinnacle HealthHarrisburgPA2,574 16,767 1,479 2,901 17,919 20,820 4,369 16,451 2002201535 years
Lancaster Rehabilitation HospitalLancasterPA959 16,610 (16)959 16,594 17,553 5,693 11,860 2007201235 years
Lancaster ASC MOBLancasterPA593 17,117 526 609 17,627 18,236 6,638 11,598 2007201235 years
150


 Location Initial Cost to Company Gross Amount Carried at Close of Period      
Property NameCity
State /
Province
Encumbrances
Land and
Improvements
Buildings and
Improvements
Costs
Capitalized
Subsequent
to Acquisition
Land and
Improvements
Buildings and
Improvements
Total
Accumulated
Depreciation
NBV
Year of
Construction
Year
Acquired
Life on
Which
Depreciation
in Income
Statement
is Computed
Gateway Medical Office BuildingConcordNC
1,100
9,904
629
1,100
10,533
11,633
3,220
8,413
2005201235 years
Copperfield Medical MallConcordNC
1,980
2,846
451
2,139
3,138
5,277
1,398
3,879
1989201225 years
Weddington Internal & Pediatric MedicineConcordNC
574
688
30
574
718
1,292
299
993
2000201227 years
Rex Wellness CenterGarnerNC
1,348
5,330
40
1,354
5,364
6,718
799
5,919
2003201534 years
Gaston Professional CenterGastoniaNC
833
24,885
2,384
833
27,269
28,102
5,947
22,155
1997201235 years
Harrisburg Family PhysiciansHarrisburgNC
679
1,646
48
679
1,694
2,373
448
1,925
1996201235 years
Harrisburg Medical MallHarrisburgNC
1,339
2,292
246
1,339
2,538
3,877
1,010
2,867
1997201227 years
NorthcrossHuntersvilleNC
623
278
73
623
351
974
228
746
1993201222 years
REX Knightdale MOB & Wellness CenterKnightdaleNC

22,823
486

23,309
23,309
3,690
19,619
2009201235 years
Midland Medical ParkMidlandNC
1,221
847
120
1,221
967
2,188
505
1,683
1998201225 years
East Rocky Mount Kidney CenterRocky MountNC
803
998
(2)803
996
1,799
370
1,429
2000201233 years
Rocky Mount Kidney CenterRocky MountNC
479
1,297
39
479
1,336
1,815
511
1,304
1990201225 years
Rocky Mount Medical ParkRocky MountNC
2,552
7,779
1,919
2,652
9,598
12,250
2,797
9,453
1991201230 years
English Road Medical CenterRocky MountNC3,877
1,321
3,747
8
1,321
3,755
5,076
1,335
3,741
2002201235 years
Rowan Outpatient Surgery CenterSalisburyNC
1,039
5,184
(5)1,039
5,179
6,218
1,323
4,895
2003201235 years
Trinity Health Medical Arts ClinicMinotND
935
15,482
49
951
15,515
16,466
2,297
14,169
1995201526 years
Cooper Health MOB IWillingboroNJ
1,389
2,742
(13)1,389
2,729
4,118
414
3,704
2010201535 years
Cooper Health MOB IIWillingboroNJ
594
5,638

594
5,638
6,232
604
5,628
2012201535 years
Salem MedicalWoodstownNJ
275
4,132
3
275
4,135
4,410
440
3,970
2010201535 years
Carson Tahoe Specialty Medical CenterCarson CityNV
688
11,346
364
723
11,675
12,398
1,339
11,059
1981201535 years
Carson Tahoe MOB WestCarson CityNV
2,862
27,519
249
2,877
27,753
30,630
3,821
26,809
2007201529 years
Del E Webb Medical PlazaHendersonNV
1,028
16,993
1,515
1,028
18,508
19,536
5,153
14,383
1999201135 years
Durango Medical PlazaLas VegasNV
3,787
27,738
(3,128)3,677
24,720
28,397
2,841
25,556
2008201535 years
The Terrace at South MeadowsRenoNV6,699
504
9,966
610
504
10,576
11,080
3,183
7,897
2004201135 years
Albany Medical Center MOBAlbanyNY
321
18,389

321
18,389
18,710
1,684
17,026
2010201535 years
St. Peter's Recovery CenterGuilderlandNY
1,059
9,156

1,059
9,156
10,215
1,127
9,088
1990201535 years
Central NY Medical CenterSyracuseNY
1,786
26,101
2,980
1,792
29,075
30,867
6,923
23,944
1997201233 years
Northcountry MOBWatertownNY
1,320
10,799
7
1,320
10,806
12,126
1,346
10,780
2001201535 years
Anderson Medical Arts Building ICincinnatiOH

9,632
1,948
20
11,560
11,580
4,608
6,972
1984200735 years
Anderson Medical Arts Building IICincinnatiOH

15,123
2,282

17,405
17,405
6,972
10,433
2007200735 years
Riverside North Medical Office BuildingColumbusOH
785
8,519
1,641
785
10,160
10,945
3,470
7,475
1962201225 years
Riverside South Medical Office BuildingColumbusOH
586
7,298
833
610
8,107
8,717
2,567
6,150
1985201227 years
340 East Town Medical Office BuildingColumbusOH
10
9,443
1,001
10
10,444
10,454
2,700
7,754
1984201229 years
393 East Town Medical Office BuildingColumbusOH
61
4,760
320
61
5,080
5,141
1,614
3,527
1970201220 years
141 South Sixth Medical Office BuildingColumbusOH
80
1,113
1,119
80
2,232
2,312
551
1,761
1971201214 years
Doctors West Medical Office BuildingColumbusOH
414
5,362
840
414
6,202
6,616
1,655
4,961
1998201235 years
Eastside Health CenterColumbusOH
956
3,472
(2)956
3,470
4,426
1,674
2,752
1977201215 years
East Main Medical Office BuildingColumbusOH
440
4,771
63
440
4,834
5,274
1,270
4,004
2006201235 years
Heart Center Medical Office BuildingColumbusOH
1,063
12,140
280
1,063
12,420
13,483
3,377
10,106
2004201235 years

 Location Initial Cost to CompanyGross Amount Carried at Close of Period   
Property NameCityState /
Province
EncumbrancesLand and
Improvements
Buildings and
Improvements
Costs
Capitalized
Subsequent
to Acquisition1
Land and
Improvements
Buildings and
Improvements
TotalAccumulated
Depreciation
NBVYear of
Construction
Year
Acquired
Life on
Which
Depreciation
in Income
Statement
is Computed
St. Joseph Medical Office BuildingReadingPA10,823 811 11,634 11,634 4,639 6,995 2006201035 years
Crozer - Keystone MOB ISpringfieldPA9,130 47,078 9,130 47,078 56,208 12,697 43,511 1996201535 years
Crozer-Keystone MOB IISpringfieldPA5,178 6,523 5,178 6,523 11,701 1,871 9,830 1998201525 years
Doylestown Health & Wellness CenterWarringtonPA4,452 17,383 1,310 4,497 18,648 23,145 6,971 16,174 2001201234 years
Roper Medical Office BuildingCharlestonSC127 14,737 4,522 138 19,248 19,386 8,148 11,238 1990201228 years
St. Francis Medical Plaza (Charleston)CharlestonSC447 3,946 870 447 4,816 5,263 2,162 3,101 2003201235 years
Providence MOB IColumbiaSC225 4,274 1,308 225 5,582 5,807 3,135 2,672 1979201218 years
Providence MOB IIColumbiaSC122 1,834 1,212 150 3,018 3,168 1,310 1,858 1985201218 years
Providence MOB IIIColumbiaSC766 4,406 1,632 766 6,038 6,804 2,467 4,337 1990201223 years
One Medical ParkColumbiaSC210 7,939 3,637 228 11,558 11,786 5,280 6,506 1984201219 years
Three Medical ParkColumbiaSC40 10,650 2,142 40 12,792 12,832 5,938 6,894 1988201225 years
St. Francis Millennium Medical Office BuildingGreenvilleSC17,326 13,062 10,807 30 23,839 23,869 12,878 10,991 2009200935 years
200 AndrewsGreenvilleSC789 2,014 1,600 810 3,593 4,403 2,273 2,130 1994201229 years
St. Francis CMOBGreenvilleSC501 7,661 1,478 501 9,139 9,640 3,243 6,397 2001201235 years
St. Francis Outpatient Surgery CenterGreenvilleSC1,007 16,538 1,083 1,007 17,621 18,628 6,991 11,637 2001201235 years
St. Francis Professional Medical CenterGreenvilleSC342 6,337 2,447 395 8,731 9,126 3,880 5,246 1984201224 years
St. Francis Women'sGreenvilleSC322 4,877 1,632 322 6,509 6,831 3,257 3,574 1991201224 years
St. Francis Medical Plaza (Greenville)GreenvilleSC88 5,876 2,409 98 8,275 8,373 3,356 5,017 1998201224 years
River Hills Medical PlazaLittle RiverSC1,406 1,813 230 1,417 2,032 3,449 1,134 2,315 1999201227 years
Mount Pleasant Medical Office LongpointMount PleasantSC670 4,455 1,392 632 5,885 6,517 2,757 3,760 2001201234 years
Medical Arts Center of OrangeburgOrangeburgSC823 3,299 588 836 3,874 4,710 1,648 3,062 1984201228 years
Mary Black Westside Medical Office BldgSpartanburgSC291 5,057 626 300 5,674 5,974 2,426 3,548 1991201231 years
Spartanburg ASCSpartanburgSC1,333 15,756 1,333 15,756 17,089 3,085 14,004 2002201535 years
Spartanburg Regional MOBSpartanburgSC207 17,963 889 290 18,769 19,059 4,020 15,039 1986201535 years
Wellmont Blue Ridge MOBBristolTN999 5,027 110 1,032 5,104 6,136 1,288 4,848 2001201535 years
Health Park Medical Office BuildingChattanoogaTN2,305 8,949 799 2,385 9,668 12,053 3,548 8,505 2004201235 years
Peerless Crossing Medical CenterClevelandTN1,217 6,464 77 1,217 6,541 7,758 2,350 5,408 2006201235 years
St. Mary's Clinton Professional Office BuildingClintonTN298 618 121 298 739 1,037 321 716 1988201539 years
St. Mary's Farragut MOBFarragutTN221 2,719 257 221 2,976 3,197 881 2,316 1997201539 years
Medical Center Physicians TowerJacksonTN12,346 549 27,074 107 598 27,132 27,730 9,930 17,800 2010201235 years
St. Mary's Ambulatory Surgery CenterKnoxvilleTN129 1,012 129 1,012 1,141 527 614 1999201524 years
Texas Clinic at ArlingtonArlingtonTX2,781 24,515 909 2,879 25,326 28,205 5,291 22,914 2010201535 years
Seton Medical Park TowerAustinTX805 41,527 10,885 1,329 51,888 53,217 14,354 38,863 1968201235 years
Seton Northwest Health PlazaAustinTX444 22,632 3,980 444 26,612 27,056 8,464 18,592 1988201235 years
Seton Southwest Health PlazaAustinTX294 5,311 637 294 5,948 6,242 1,809 4,433 2004201235 years
Seton Southwest Health Plaza IIAustinTX447 10,154 84 447 10,238 10,685 3,201 7,484 2009201235 years
BioLife Sciences BuildingDentonTX1,036 6,576 1,036 6,576 7,612 1,658 5,954 2010201535 years
151
 Location Initial Cost to Company Gross Amount Carried at Close of Period      
Property NameCity
State /
Province
Encumbrances
Land and
Improvements
Buildings and
Improvements
Costs
Capitalized
Subsequent
to Acquisition
Land and
Improvements
Buildings and
Improvements
Total
Accumulated
Depreciation
NBV
Year of
Construction
Year
Acquired
Life on
Which
Depreciation
in Income
Statement
is Computed
Wilkins Medical Office BuildingColumbusOH
123
18,062
343
123
18,405
18,528
3,968
14,560
2002201235 years
Grady Medical Office BuildingDelawareOH
239
2,263
370
239
2,633
2,872
940
1,932
1991201225 years
Dublin Northwest Medical Office BuildingDublinOH
342
3,278
234
342
3,512
3,854
1,093
2,761
2001201234 years
Preserve III Medical Office BuildingDublinOH
2,449
7,025
(66)2,449
6,959
9,408
1,883
7,525
2006201235 years
Zanesville Surgery CenterZanesvilleOH
172
9,403

172
9,403
9,575
2,126
7,449
2000201135 years
Dialysis CenterZanesvilleOH
534
855
81
534
936
1,470
541
929
1960201121 years
Genesis Children's CenterZanesvilleOH
538
3,781

538
3,781
4,319
1,184
3,135
2006201130 years
Medical Arts Building IZanesvilleOH
429
2,405
520
436
2,918
3,354
1,200
2,154
1970201120 years
Medical Arts Building IIZanesvilleOH
485
6,013
835
510
6,823
7,333
2,780
4,553
1995201125 years
Medical Arts Building IIIZanesvilleOH
94
1,248

94
1,248
1,342
505
837
1970201125 years
Primecare BuildingZanesvilleOH
130
1,344
648
130
1,992
2,122
776
1,346
1978201120 years
Outpatient Rehabilitation BuildingZanesvilleOH
82
1,541

82
1,541
1,623
521
1,102
1985201128 years
Radiation Oncology BuildingZanesvilleOH
105
1,201

105
1,201
1,306
477
829
1988201125 years
HealthplexZanesvilleOH
2,488
15,849
648
2,508
16,477
18,985
5,213
13,772
1990201132 years
Physicians PavilionZanesvilleOH
422
6,297
1,425
422
7,722
8,144
2,746
5,398
1990201125 years
Zanesville Northside PharmacyZanesvilleOH
42
635

42
635
677
223
454
1985201128 years
Bethesda Campus MOB IIIZanesvilleOH
188
1,137
141
199
1,267
1,466
482
984
1978201125 years
Tuality 7th Avenue Medical PlazaHillsboroOR18,230
1,516
24,638
1,387
1,533
26,008
27,541
6,694
20,847
2003201135 years
Professional Office Building IChesterPA

6,283
2,410

8,693
8,693
4,178
4,515
1978200430 years
DCMH Medical Office BuildingDrexel HillPA

10,424
1,599

12,023
12,023
6,223
5,800
1984200430 years
Pinnacle HealthHarrisburgPA
2,574
16,767
407
2,674
17,074
19,748
2,050
17,698
2002201535 years
Lancaster Rehabilitation HospitalLancasterPA
959
16,610
(16)959
16,594
17,553
3,815
13,738
2007201235 years
Lancaster ASC MOBLancasterPA
593
17,117
433
593
17,550
18,143
4,469
13,674
2007201235 years
St. Joseph Medical Office BuildingReadingPA

10,823
811

11,634
11,634
3,689
7,945
2006201035 years
Crozer - Keystone MOB ISpringfieldPA
9,130
47,078

9,130
47,078
56,208
6,259
49,949
1996201535 years
Crozer-Keystone MOB IISpringfieldPA
5,178
6,523

5,178
6,523
11,701
922
10,779
1998201525 years
Doylestown Health & Wellness CenterWarringtonPA
4,452
17,383
960
4,497
18,298
22,795
4,799
17,996
2001201234 years
Roper Medical Office BuildingCharlestonSC7,890
127
14,737
3,582
127
18,319
18,446
4,913
13,533
1990201228 years
St. Francis Medical Plaza (Charleston)CharlestonSC
447
3,946
621
447
4,567
5,014
1,369
3,645
2003201235 years
Providence MOB IColumbiaSC
225
4,274
869
225
5,143
5,368
2,105
3,263
1979201218 years
Providence MOB IIColumbiaSC
122
1,834
172
150
1,978
2,128
854
1,274
1985201218 years
Providence MOB IIIColumbiaSC
766
4,406
797
766
5,203
5,969
1,635
4,334
1990201223 years
One Medical ParkColumbiaSC
210
7,939
1,152
214
9,087
9,301
3,422
5,879
1984201219 years
Three Medical ParkColumbiaSC
40
10,650
1,411
40
12,061
12,101
3,840
8,261
1988201225 years
St. Francis Millennium Medical Office BuildingGreenvilleSC14,707

13,062
10,618
30
23,650
23,680
9,808
13,872
2009200935 years
200 AndrewsGreenvilleSC
789
2,014
362
803
2,362
3,165
1,242
1,923
1994201229 years
St. Francis CMOBGreenvilleSC
501
7,661
895
501
8,556
9,057
2,083
6,974
2001201235 years
St. Francis Outpatient Surgery CenterGreenvilleSC
1,007
16,538
889
1,007
17,427
18,434
4,449
13,985
2001201235 years



 Location Initial Cost to CompanyGross Amount Carried at Close of Period   
Property NameCityState /
Province
EncumbrancesLand and
Improvements
Buildings and
Improvements
Costs
Capitalized
Subsequent
to Acquisition1
Land and
Improvements
Buildings and
Improvements
TotalAccumulated
Depreciation
NBVYear of
Construction
Year
Acquired
Life on
Which
Depreciation
in Income
Statement
is Computed
East Houston MOB, LLCHoustonTX356 2,877 1,242 328 4,147 4,475 3,245 1,230 1982201115 years
East Houston Medical PlazaHoustonTX671 426 10 237 870 1,107 1,023 84 1982201111 years
Memorial HermannHoustonTX822 14,307 822 14,307 15,129 2,943 12,186 2012201535 years
Scott & White HealthcareKingslandTX534 5,104 534 5,104 5,638 1,203 4,435 2012201535 years
Lakeway Medical PlazaLakewayTX8,969 270 20,169 2,625 270 22,794 23,064 1,569 21,495 2011201835 years
Odessa Regional MOBOdessaTX121 8,935 121 8,935 9,056 1,911 7,145 2008201535 years
Legacy Heart CenterPlanoTX3,081 8,890 183 3,081 9,073 12,154 2,364 9,790 2005201535 years
Seton Williamson Medical PlazaRound RockTX15,074 870 15,944 15,944 6,218 9,726 2008201035 years
Sunnyvale Medical PlazaSunnyvaleTX1,186 15,397 448 1,243 15,788 17,031 3,613 13,418 2009201535 years
Texarkana ASCTexarkanaTX814 5,903 166 814 6,069 6,883 1,665 5,218 1994201530 years
Spring Creek Medical PlazaTomballTX2,165 8,212 355 2,165 8,567 10,732 1,780 8,952 2006201535 years
MRMC MOB IMechanicsvilleVA1,669 7,024 711 1,669 7,735 9,404 3,824 5,580 1993201231 years
Henrico MOBRichmondVA968 6,189 1,534 359 8,332 8,691 4,041 4,650 1976201125 years
St. Mary's MOB North (Floors 6 & 7)RichmondVA227 2,961 1,105 227 4,066 4,293 1,950 2,343 1968201222 years
Stony Point Medical CenterRichmondVA3,822 16,127 807 3,822 16,934 20,756 3,537 17,219 2004201535 years
St. Francis Cancer CenterRichmondVA654 18,331 2,385 657 20,713 21,370 4,327 17,043 2006201535 years
Bonney Lake Medical Office BuildingBonney LakeWA10,159 5,176 14,375 321 5,176 14,696 19,872 5,659 14,213 2011201235 years
Good Samaritan Medical Office BuildingPuyallupWA11,872 781 30,368 3,233 893 33,489 34,382 10,513 23,869 2011201235 years
Holy Family Hospital Central MOBSpokaneWA19,085 475 19,560 19,560 5,010 14,550 2007201235 years
Physician's PavilionVancouverWA1,411 32,939 1,388 1,450 34,288 35,738 12,059 23,679 2001201135 years
Administration BuildingVancouverWA296 7,856 59 317 7,894 8,211 2,743 5,468 1972201135 years
Medical Center Physician's BuildingVancouverWA1,225 31,246 4,257 1,488 35,240 36,728 12,541 24,187 1980201135 years
Memorial MOBVancouverWA663 12,626 1,621 690 14,220 14,910 5,054 9,856 1999201135 years
Salmon Creek MOBVancouverWA1,325 9,238 607 1,325 9,845 11,170 3,441 7,729 1994201135 years
Fisher's Landing MOBVancouverWA1,590 5,420 457 1,613 5,854 7,467 2,415 5,052 1995201134 years
Columbia Medical PlazaVancouverWA281 5,266 544 331 5,760 6,091 2,141 3,950 1991201135 years
Appleton Heart InstituteAppletonWI7,775 46 7,821 7,821 2,691 5,130 2003201039 years
Appleton Medical Offices WestAppletonWI5,756 1,146 6,902 6,902 2,283 4,619 1989201039 years
Appleton Medical Offices SouthAppletonWI9,058 537 9,595 9,595 3,416 6,179 1983201039 years
Brookfield ClinicBrookfieldWI2,638 4,093 (2,198)440 4,093 4,533 1,810 2,723 1999201135 years
Lakeshore Medical Clinic - FranklinFranklinWI1,973 7,579 149 2,029 7,672 9,701 1,947 7,754 2008201534 years
Lakeshore Medical Clinic - GreenfieldGreenfieldWI1,223 13,387 126 1,223 13,513 14,736 2,795 11,941 2010201535 years
Aurora Health Care - HartfordHartfordWI3,706 22,019 3,706 22,019 25,725 5,165 20,560 2006201535 years
Hartland ClinicHartlandWI321 5,050 321 5,050 5,371 1,919 3,452 1994201135 years
Aurora Healthcare - KenoshaKenoshaWI7,546 19,155 7,546 19,155 26,701 4,590 22,111 2014201535 years
Univ of Wisconsin HealthMononaWI678 8,017 202 678 8,219 8,897 2,050 6,847 2011201535 years
Theda Clark Medical Center Office PavilionNeenahWI7,080 1,216 8,296 8,296 2,861 5,435 1993201039 years
Aylward Medical Building Condo Floors 3 & 4NeenahWI4,462 250 4,712 4,712 1,762 2,950 2006201039 years
152


 Location Initial Cost to Company Gross Amount Carried at Close of Period      
Property NameCity
State /
Province
Encumbrances
Land and
Improvements
Buildings and
Improvements
Costs
Capitalized
Subsequent
to Acquisition
Land and
Improvements
Buildings and
Improvements
Total
Accumulated
Depreciation
NBV
Year of
Construction
Year
Acquired
Life on
Which
Depreciation
in Income
Statement
is Computed
St. Francis Professional Medical CenterGreenvilleSC
342
6,337
1,336
371
7,644
8,015
2,211
5,804
1984201224 years
St. Francis Women'sGreenvilleSC
322
4,877
611
322
5,488
5,810
2,186
3,624
1991201224 years
St. Francis Medical Plaza (Greenville)GreenvilleSC
88
5,876
1,028
98
6,894
6,992
1,995
4,997
1998201224 years
Irmo Professional MOBIrmoSC
1,726
5,414
258
1,726
5,672
7,398
1,945
5,453
2004201135 years
River Hills Medical PlazaLittle RiverSC
1,406
1,813
187
1,406
2,000
3,406
736
2,670
1999201227 years
Mount Pleasant Medical Office LongpointMount PleasantSC
670
4,455
186
632
4,679
5,311
1,952
3,359
2001201234 years
Mary Black Westside Medical Office BldgSpartanburgSC
291
5,057
516
300
5,564
5,864
1,618
4,246
1991201231 years
Spartanburg ASCSpartanburgSC
1,333
15,756

1,333
15,756
17,089
1,521
15,568
2002201535 years
Spartanburg Regional MOBSpartanburgSC
207
17,963
550
286
18,434
18,720
1,995
16,725
1986201535 years
Wellmont Blue Ridge MOBBristolTN
999
5,027
32
999
5,059
6,058
628
5,430
2001201535 years
Health Park Medical Office BuildingChattanoogaTN5,955
2,305
8,949
51
2,305
9,000
11,305
2,317
8,988
2004201235 years
Peerless Crossing Medical CenterClevelandTN
1,217
6,464
13
1,217
6,477
7,694
1,577
6,117
2006201235 years
St. Mary's Clinton Professional Office BuildingClintonTN
298
618
6
298
624
922
145
777
1988201539 years
St. Mary's Farragut MOBFarragutTN
221
2,719
137
221
2,856
3,077
351
2,726
1997201539 years
Medical Center Physicians TowerJacksonTN13,344
549
27,074
50
598
27,075
27,673
6,744
20,929
2010201235 years
St. Mary's Physician Professional Office BuildingKnoxvilleTN
138
3,144
129
138
3,273
3,411
509
2,902
1981201539 years
St. Mary's Magdalene Clarke TowerKnoxvilleTN
69
4,153
11
69
4,164
4,233
583
3,650
1972201539 years
St. Mary's Medical Office BuildingKnoxvilleTN
136
359
31
136
390
526
124
402
1976201539 years
St. Mary's Ambulatory Surgery CenterKnoxvilleTN
129
1,012

129
1,012
1,141
221
920
1999201524 years
Texas Clinic at ArlingtonArlingtonTX
2,781
24,515
91
2,781
24,606
27,387
2,680
24,707
2010201535 years
Seton Medical Park TowerAustinTX
805
41,527
2,803
1,329
43,806
45,135
8,799
36,336
1968201235 years
Seton Northwest Health PlazaAustinTX
444
22,632
2,809
444
25,441
25,885
5,188
20,697
1988201235 years
Seton Southwest Health PlazaAustinTX
294
5,311
241
294
5,552
5,846
1,133
4,713
2004201235 years
Seton Southwest Health Plaza IIAustinTX
447
10,154
84
447
10,238
10,685
2,124
8,561
2009201235 years
BioLife Sciences BuildingDentonTX
1,036
6,576

1,036
6,576
7,612
817
6,795
2010201535 years
East Houston MOB, LLCHoustonTX
356
2,877
702
328
3,607
3,935
2,084
1,851
1982201115 years
East Houston Medical PlazaHoustonTX
671
426
535
671
961
1,632
847
785
1982201111 years
Memorial HermannHoustonTX
822
14,307

822
14,307
15,129
1,451
13,678
2012201535 years
Scott & White HealthcareKingslandTX
534
5,104

534
5,104
5,638
593
5,045
2012201535 years
Odessa Regional MOBOdessaTX
121
8,935

121
8,935
9,056
942
8,114
2008201535 years
Legacy Heart CenterPlanoTX
3,081
8,890
8
3,081
8,898
11,979
1,148
10,831
2005201535 years
Seton Williamson Medical PlazaRound RockTX

15,074
586

15,660
15,660
4,849
10,811
2008201035 years
Sunnyvale Medical PlazaSunnyvaleTX
1,186
15,397
397
1,215
15,765
16,980
1,834
15,146
2009201535 years
Texarkana ASCTexarkanaTX
814
5,903

814
5,903
6,717
785
5,932
1994201530 years
Spring Creek Medical PlazaTomballTX
2,165
8,212
16
2,165
8,228
10,393
888
9,505
2006201535 years
251 Medical CenterWebsterTX
1,158
12,078
(3,777)1,163
8,296
9,459
2,616
6,843
2006201135 years

 Location Initial Cost to CompanyGross Amount Carried at Close of Period   
Property NameCityState /
Province
EncumbrancesLand and
Improvements
Buildings and
Improvements
Costs
Capitalized
Subsequent
to Acquisition1
Land and
Improvements
Buildings and
Improvements
TotalAccumulated
Depreciation
NBVYear of
Construction
Year
Acquired
Life on
Which
Depreciation
in Income
Statement
is Computed
Aurora Health Care - NeenahNeenahWI2,033 9,072 2,033 9,072 11,105 2,284 8,821 2006201535 years
New Berlin ClinicNew BerlinWI678 7,121 678 7,121 7,799 2,913 4,886 1999201135 years
United Healthcare - OnalaskaOnalaskaWI4,623 5,527 38 4,623 5,565 10,188 1,807 8,381 1995201535 years
WestWood Health & FitnessPewaukeeWI823 11,649 823 11,649 12,472 4,763 7,709 1997201135 years
Aurora Health Care - Two RiversTwo RiversWI5,638 25,308 5,638 25,308 30,946 5,983 24,963 2006201535 years
Watertown ClinicWatertownWI166 3,234 166 3,234 3,400 1,184 2,216 2003201135 years
Southside ClinicWaukeshaWI218 5,273 218 5,273 5,491 1,950 3,541 1997201135 years
Rehabilitation HospitalWaukeshaWI372 15,636 372 15,636 16,008 5,114 10,894 2008201135 years
United Healthcare - WauwatosaWawatosaWI8,012 15,992 76 8,012 16,068 24,080 4,634 19,446 1995201535 years
TOTAL FOR MEDICAL OFFICE BUILDINGS386,320 376,960 4,168,796 461,561 372,864 4,634,453 5,007,317 1,477,051 3,530,266 
LIFE SCIENCES OFFICE BUILDINGS
300 George StreetNew HavenCT2,262 122,144 7,780 2,582 129,604 132,186 12,486 119,700 2014201650 years
Univ. of Miami Life Science and Technology ParkMiamiFL2,249 87,019 6,325 2,253 93,340 95,593 11,326 84,267 2014201653 years
IITChicagoIL30 55,620 1,061 30 56,681 56,711 5,923 50,788 2006201646 years
University of Maryland BioPark I Unit 1BaltimoreMD113 25,199 819 113 26,018 26,131 2,607 23,524 2005201650 years
University of Maryland BioPark IIBaltimoreMD61 91,764 5,363 61 97,127 97,188 10,331 86,857 2007201650 years
University of Maryland BioPark GarageBaltimoreMD77 4,677 443 77 5,120 5,197 897 4,300 2007201629 years
Tributary StreetBaltimoreMD4,015 15,905 597 4,015 16,502 20,517 2,378 18,139 1998201645 years
Beckley StreetBaltimoreMD2,813 13,481 832 2,813 14,313 17,126 2,104 15,022 1999201645 years
University of Maryland BioPark IIIBaltimoreMD1,067 857 1,067 857 1,924 1,918 CIPCIPCIP
Heritage at 4240Saint LouisMO403 47,125 1,258 452 48,334 48,786 6,511 42,275 2013201645 years
Cortex 1Saint LouisMO631 26,543 1,172 631 27,715 28,346 3,758 24,588 2005201650 years
BRDG ParkSaint LouisMO606 37,083 2,246 606 39,329 39,935 4,480 35,455 2009201652 years
4220 Duncan AvenueSt LouisMO1,871 35,044 9,974 1,871 45,018 46,889 7,105 39,784 2018201835 years
311 South Sarah StreetSt. LouisMO5,154 5,154 5,154 314 4,840 CIPCIPCIP
4300 DuncanSt. LouisMO2,818 46,749 18 2,818 46,767 49,585 4,830 44,755 2008201735 years
Weston ParkwayCaryNC1,372 6,535 1,743 1,372 8,278 9,650 1,489 8,161 1990201650 years
Patriot DriveDurhamNC1,960 10,749 378 1,960 11,127 13,087 1,364 11,723 2010201650 years
ChesterfieldDurhamNC3,594 57,781 5,558 3,619 63,314 66,933 14,396 52,537 2017201760 years
Paramount ParkwayMorrisvilleNC1,016 19,794 617 1,016 20,411 21,427 2,824 18,603 1999201645 years
Center for Technology & InnovationRaleighNC786 50,674 786 50,674 51,460 1,400 50,060 2016202035 years
Keystone Science CenterRaleighNC408 25,841 408 25,841 26,249 715 25,534 2010202035 years
Wake 90Winston-SalemNC2,752 79,949 1,757 2,752 81,706 84,458 10,584 73,874 2013201640 years
Wake 60Winston-SalemNC15,000 1,243 83,414 1,370 1,243 84,784 86,027 12,079 73,948 2016201635 years
Bailey Power PlantWinston-SalemNC1,930 34,122 249 846 35,455 36,301 4,359 31,942 2017201735 years
Hershey Center Unit 1HummelstownPA813 23,699 965 819 24,658 25,477 2,882 22,595 2007201650 years
153


 Location Initial Cost to Company Gross Amount Carried at Close of Period      
Property NameCity
State /
Province
Encumbrances
Land and
Improvements
Buildings and
Improvements
Costs
Capitalized
Subsequent
to Acquisition
Land and
Improvements
Buildings and
Improvements
Total
Accumulated
Depreciation
NBV
Year of
Construction
Year
Acquired
Life on
Which
Depreciation
in Income
Statement
is Computed
253 Medical CenterWebsterTX
1,181
11,862
(3,820)1,181
8,042
9,223
2,460
6,763
2009201135 years
MRMC MOB IMechanicsvilleVA
1,669
7,024
433
1,669
7,457
9,126
2,694
6,432
1993201231 years
Henrico MOBRichmondVA
968
6,189
1,209
968
7,398
8,366
2,677
5,689
1976201125 years
St. Mary's MOB North (Floors 6 & 7)RichmondVA
227
2,961
633
227
3,594
3,821
1,257
2,564
1968201222 years
Virginia Urology CenterRichmondVA
3,822
16,127

3,822
16,127
19,949
1,899
18,050
2004201535 years
St. Francis Cancer CenterRichmondVA
654
18,331
23
657
18,351
19,008
1,956
17,052
2006201535 years
Bonney Lake Medical Office BuildingBonney LakeWA10,203
5,176
14,375
165
5,176
14,540
19,716
3,820
15,896
2011201235 years
Good Samaritan Medical Office BuildingPuyallupWA13,220
781
30,368
692
801
31,040
31,841
6,620
25,221
2011201235 years
Holy Family Hospital Central MOBSpokaneWA

19,085
260

19,345
19,345
3,181
16,164
2007201235 years
Physician's PavilionVancouverWA
1,411
32,939
957
1,431
33,876
35,307
8,662
26,645
2001201135 years
Administration BuildingVancouverWA
296
7,856

296
7,856
8,152
2,013
6,139
1972201135 years
Medical Center Physician's BuildingVancouverWA
1,225
31,246
2,791
1,251
34,011
35,262
8,191
27,071
1980201135 years
Memorial MOBVancouverWA
663
12,626
750
690
13,349
14,039
3,307
10,732
1999201135 years
Salmon Creek MOBVancouverWA
1,325
9,238

1,325
9,238
10,563
2,340
8,223
1994201135 years
Fisher's Landing MOBVancouverWA
1,590
5,420

1,590
5,420
7,010
1,654
5,356
1995201134 years
Columbia Medical Plaza VancouverVancouverWA
281
5,266
323
331
5,539
5,870
1,465
4,405
1991201135 years
Appleton Heart InstituteAppletonWI

7,775
31

7,806
7,806
2,126
5,680
2003201039 years
Appleton Medical Offices WestAppletonWI

5,756
85

5,841
5,841
1,602
4,239
1989201039 years
Appleton Medical Offices SouthAppletonWI

9,058
185

9,243
9,243
2,671
6,572
1983201039 years
Brookfield ClinicBrookfieldWI
2,638
4,093

2,638
4,093
6,731
1,295
5,436
1999201135 years
Lakeshore Medical Clinic - FranklinFranklinWI
1,973
7,579
65
2,029
7,588
9,617
940
8,677
2008201534 years
Lakeshore Medical Clinic - GreenfieldGreenfieldWI
1,223
13,387
10
1,223
13,397
14,620
1,373
13,247
2010201535 years
Aurora Health Care - HartfordHartfordWI
3,706
22,019

3,706
22,019
25,725
2,546
23,179
2006201535 years
Hartland ClinicHartlandWI
321
5,050

321
5,050
5,371
1,361
4,010
1994201135 years
Aurora Healthcare - KenoshaKenoshaWI
7,546
19,155

7,546
19,155
26,701
2,263
24,438
2014201535 years
Univ of Wisconsin HealthMononaWI
678
8,017

678
8,017
8,695
1,011
7,684
2011201535 years
Theda Clark Medical Center Office PavilionNeenahWI

7,080
747

7,827
7,827
2,008
5,819
1993201039 years
Aylward Medical Building Condo Floors 3 & 4NeenahWI

4,462
95

4,557
4,557
1,330
3,227
2006201039 years
Aurora Health Care - NeenahNeenahWI
2,033
9,072

2,033
9,072
11,105
1,126
9,979
2006201535 years
New Berlin ClinicNew BerlinWI
678
7,121

678
7,121
7,799
2,062
5,737
1999201135 years
United Healthcare - OnalaskaOnalaskaWI
4,623
5,527

4,623
5,527
10,150
891
9,259
1995201535 years
WestWood Health & FitnessPewaukeeWI
823
11,649

823
11,649
12,472
3,403
9,069
1997201135 years
Aurora Health Care - Two RiversTwo RiversWI
5,638
25,308

5,638
25,308
30,946
2,950
27,996
2006201535 years
Watertown ClinicWatertownWI
166
3,234

166
3,234
3,400
841
2,559
2003201135 years
Southside ClinicWaukeshaWI
218
5,273

218
5,273
5,491
1,389
4,102
1997201135 years
Rehabilitation HospitalWaukeshaWI
372
15,636

372
15,636
16,008
3,608
12,400
2008201135 years
United Healthcare - WauwatosaWawatosaWI
8,012
15,992

8,012
15,992
24,004
2,284
21,720
1995201535 years
 Location Initial Cost to CompanyGross Amount Carried at Close of Period   
Property NameCityState /
Province
EncumbrancesLand and
Improvements
Buildings and
Improvements
Costs
Capitalized
Subsequent
to Acquisition1
Land and
Improvements
Buildings and
Improvements
TotalAccumulated
Depreciation
NBVYear of
Construction
Year
Acquired
Life on
Which
Depreciation
in Income
Statement
is Computed
3737 Market StreetPhiladelphiaPA66,108 40 141,981 6,298 40 148,279 148,319 12,988 135,331 2014201654 years
3711 Market StreetPhiladelphiaPA12,320 69,278 7,168 12,320 76,446 88,766 8,524 80,242 2008201648 years
3675 Market StreetPhiladelphiaPA116,166 11,370 109,846 43,802 11,370 153,648 165,018 15,679 149,339 2018201835 years
3701 Filbert StreetPhiladelphiaPA3,627 3,627 3,627 251 3,376 CIPCIPCIP
115 North 38th StreetPhiladelphiaPA2,163 2,163 2,163 149 2,014 CIPCIPCIP
225 North 38th StreetPhiladelphiaPA9,965 5,387 9,965 5,387 15,352 683 14,669 CIPCIPCIP
3401 Market StreetPhiladelphiaPA4,500 22,157 307 4,533 22,431 26,964 1,574 25,390 1923201835 years
75 N. 38th Street (6799)PhiladelphiaPA9,432 9,432 9,432 9,432 N/A2019N/A
South Street LandingProvidenceRI6,358 111,797 (1,053)6,358 110,744 117,102 6,067 111,035 2017201745 years
2/3 Davol SquareProvidenceRI4,537 6,886 9,259 4,656 16,026 20,682 2,796 17,886 2005201715 years
One Ship StreetProvidenceRI1,943 1,734 (29)1,943 1,705 3,648 268 3,380 1980201725 years
Brown Academic/R&D BuildingProvidenceRI47,294 68,335 (8,713)59,622 59,622 2,611 57,011 2019201935 years
Providence Phase 2ProvidenceRI2,251 2,251 2,251 2,251 CIPCIPCIP
Wexford Biotech 8RichmondVA2,615 85,514 5,564 2,615 91,078 93,693 11,713 81,980 2012201735 years
VTR Pre Development Expense23,358 23,358 23,358 23,358 CIPCIPCIP
TOTAL FOR LIFE SCIENCES OFFICE BUILDINGS244,568 111,165 1,648,041 113,128 110,637 1,761,697 1,872,334 190,451 1,681,883 
TOTAL FOR OFFICE630,888 488,125 5,816,837 574,689 483,501 6,396,150 6,879,651 1,667,502 5,212,149 
TOTAL FOR ALL PROPERTIES$2,220,206 $2,246,273 $22,949,998 $1,654,171 $2,261,415 $24,589,027 $26,850,442 $6,967,413 $19,883,029 


1 Adjustments to basis included provisions for asset impairments, partial dispositions, costs capitalized subsequent to acquisitions and foreign currency translation adjustments.
154
 Location Initial Cost to Company Gross Amount Carried at Close of Period      
Property NameCity
State /
Province
Encumbrances
Land and
Improvements
Buildings and
Improvements
Costs
Capitalized
Subsequent
to Acquisition
Land and
Improvements
Buildings and
Improvements
Total
Accumulated
Depreciation
NBV
Year of
Construction
Year
Acquired
Life on
Which
Depreciation
in Income
Statement
is Computed
BSG CS, LLCWaunakeeWI
1,060

(134)926

926

926
N/A2012N/A
TOTAL FOR MEDICAL OFFICE BUILDINGS  350,898
389,589
4,108,450
249,979
392,718
4,355,300
4,748,018
950,558
3,797,460
   
LIFE SCIENCE AND INNOVATION CENTERS              
100 College StreetNew HavenCT
2,706
186,570
5,985
2,706
192,555
195,261
5,311
189,950
2013201659 years
300 George StreetNew HavenCT
2,262
122,144
3,972
2,262
126,116
128,378
3,805
124,573
2014201650 years
Univ. of Miami Life Science and Technology ParkMiamiFL
2,249
87,019
4,603
2,249
91,622
93,871
3,204
90,667
2014201653 years
IITChicagoIL
30
55,620
67
30
55,687
55,717
1,784
53,933
2006201646 years
University of Maryland BioPark I Unit 1BaltimoreMD
113
25,199
789
113
25,988
26,101
813
25,288
2005201650 years
University of Maryland BioPark IIBaltimoreMD
61
91,764
3,243
61
95,007
95,068
3,446
91,622
2007201650 years
University of Maryland BioPark GarageBaltimoreMD
77
4,677
345
77
5,022
5,099
267
4,832
2007201629 years
Tributary StreetBaltimoreMD
4,015
15,905
597
4,015
16,502
20,517
770
19,747
1998201645 years
Beckley StreetBaltimoreMD
2,813
13,481
574
2,813
14,055
16,868
675
16,193
1999201645 years
University of Maryland BioPark IIIBaltimoreMD
980
34

980
34
1,014

1,014
CIPCIPCIP
Heritage at 4240Saint LouisMO
403
47,125
325
452
47,401
47,853
2,104
45,749
2013201645 years
Cortex 1Saint LouisMO
631
26,543
1,094
631
27,637
28,268
1,301
26,967
2005201650 years
BRDG ParkSaint LouisMO
606
37,083
1,580
606
38,663
39,269
1,208
38,061
2009201652 years
4220 Duncan AvenueSt LouisMO


14,921
1,871
13,050
14,921

14,921
N/A2016N/A
311 South Sarah StreetSt. LouisMO
7,567
(1,775)
7,567
(1,775)5,792
6
5,786
CIPCIPCIP
4300 DuncanSt. LouisMO
2,818
46,749

2,818
46,749
49,567
130
49,437
2008201735 years
Weston ParkwayCaryNC
1,372
6,535
1,018
1,372
7,553
8,925
285
8,640
1990201650 years
Patriot DriveDurhamNC
1,960
10,749
373
1,960
11,122
13,082
465
12,617
2010201650 years
ChesterfieldDurhamNC
3,266
58,020

3,266
58,020
61,286
841
60,445
2017201760 years
Paramount ParkwayMorrisvilleNC
1,016
19,794
617
1,016
20,411
21,427
869
20,558
1999201645 years
Wake 90Winston-SalemNC
2,752
79,949
105
2,752
80,054
82,806
3,196
79,610
2013201640 years
Wake 91Winston-SalemNC
1,729
73,690

1,729
73,690
75,419
2,395
73,024
2011201650 years
Wake 60Winston-SalemNC15,000
1,243
83,414
1,868
1,243
85,282
86,525
3,320
83,205
2016201635 years
Bailey Power PlantWinston-SalemNC
1,930
33,395

1,930
33,395
35,325

35,325
2017201735 years
Hershey Center Unit 1HummelstownPA
813
23,699
786
813
24,485
25,298
918
24,380
2007201650 years
3737 Market StreetPhiladelphiaPA
40
141,981
5,711
40
147,692
147,732
3,950
143,782
2014201654 years
3711 Market StreetPhiladelphiaPA
12,320
69,278
2,597
12,320
71,875
84,195
2,342
81,853
2008201648 years
3750 Lancaster AvenuePhiladelphiaPA

205


205
205

205
CIPCIPCIP
3675 Market StreetPhiladelphiaPA
11,370
53,539

11,370
53,539
64,909

64,909
CIPCIPCIP
3701 Filbert StreetPhiladelphiaPA

1,080


1,080
1,080

1,080
CIPCIPCIP
115 North 38th StreetPhiladelphiaPA

289


289
289

289
CIPCIPCIP
225 North 38th StreetPhiladelphiaPA

2,460


2,460
2,460

2,460
CIPCIPCIP
South Street LandingProvidenceRI
6,358
112,036

6,358
112,036
118,394
997
117,397
2017201745 years



 Location Initial Cost to Company Gross Amount Carried at Close of Period      
Property NameCity
State /
Province
Encumbrances
Land and
Improvements
Buildings and
Improvements
Costs
Capitalized
Subsequent
to Acquisition
Land and
Improvements
Buildings and
Improvements
Total
Accumulated
Depreciation
NBV
Year of
Construction
Year
Acquired
Life on
Which
Depreciation
in Income
Statement
is Computed
2/3 Davol SquareProvidenceRI
4,537
6,886

4,537
6,886
11,423
660
10,763
2005201715 years
One Ship StreetProvidenceRI
1,943
1,734

1,943
1,734
3,677
58
3,619
1980201725 years
Brown Academic/R&D BuildingProvidenceRI


9,834

9,834
9,834

9,834
2007201655 years
IRP INorfolkVA
60
20,084
607
60
20,691
20,751
720
20,031
2007201655 years
IRP IINorfolkVA
69
21,255
748
69
22,003
22,072
715
21,357
2007201655 years
Wexford Biotech 8RichmondVA
2,615
85,496

2,615
85,496
88,111
474
87,637
2012201735 years
TOTAL FOR LIFE SCIENCE AND INNOVATION CENTERS  14,999
82,724
1,663,706
62,359
84,644
1,724,145
1,808,789
47,029
1,761,760
   
TOTAL OFFICE BUILDINGS  365,897
472,313
5,772,156
312,338
477,362
6,079,445
6,556,807
997,587
5,559,220
   
TOTAL FOR ALL PROPERTIES  $1,308,564
$2,140,863
$21,575,402
$951,573
$2,147,621
$22,520,217
$24,667,838
$4,785,395
$19,882,443
   


VENTAS, INC.
SCHEDULE IV
MORTGAGE LOANS ON REAL ESTATE
December 31, 20172020

LocationNumber of RE AssetsInterest RateFixed / VariableMaturity DateMonthly Debt ServiceFace ValueNet Book ValuePrior Liens
(In thousands)
First Mortgages
Multiple79.24%V3/31/2025388,310 66,000 66,000 174,020 
Mezzanine Loans
Multiple1566.58%V6/9/20212,889,690 487,648 486,797 1,020,080 
Total$3,278,000 $553,648 $552,797 $1,194,100 
Mortgage Loan Reconciliation
202020192018
(In thousands)
Beginning Balance$642,218 $427,117 $565,875 
Additions:
New loans66,000 1,234,244 9,900 
Construction draws
Total additions66,000 1,234,244 9,900 
Deductions:
Principal repayments(155,170)(1,011,353)(148,658)
Total deductions(155,170)(1,011,353)(148,658)
Effect of foreign currency translation(251)(7,790)
Ending Balance$552,797 $642,218 $427,117 
 LocationNumber of RE AssetsInterest RateFixed / VariableMaturity DateMonthly Debt ServiceFace ValueNet Book ValuePrior Liens
      (In thousands)
First Mortgages       
 Multiple39.77%V6/30/2019$137
$17,023
$17,023
$
 Ohio58.13%V10/1/2021535
78,448
78,448

          
Mezzanine Loans       
 Multiple319.95%F/V2/6/20211,091
121,699
121,699
1,420,844
 Multiple*1798.27%F/V12/9/20192,138
290,099
290,099
1,560,415
          
Construction Loans       
 Colorado18.75%V2/6/2021437
59,045
58,606

Total    $4,338
$566,314
$565,875
$2,981,259
          
* The variable portion of this investment has a maturity date of 12/9/2018, with extension options to 12/9/2019.
155
 Mortgage Loan Reconciliation
 
   2017 2016 2015
   (In thousands)
 Beginning Balance $634,969
 $784,821
 $747,456
 Additions:      
 New Loans 
 140,000
 88,648
 Construction Draws 
 13,403
 53,708
 Total additions 
 153,403
 142,356
 Deductions:      
 Principal Repayments (68,655) (303,255) (99,467)
 Spin Off 
 
 (5,524)
 Total deductions (68,655) (303,255) (104,991)
 Ending Balance $566,314
 $634,969
 $784,821



ITEM 9.    Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure
None.


ITEM 9A.    Controls and Procedures
Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures
As required by Rules 13a-15(b) and 15d-15(b) of the Exchange Act, our management, with the participation of our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, has evaluated the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures as of December 31, 2017.2020. Based on that evaluation, our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Exchange Act) were effective as of December 31, 2017,2020, at the reasonable assurance level.
Internal Control over Financial Reporting
The information set forth under “Management Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting” and “Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm on Internal Control over Financial Reporting” included in Part II, Item 8 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K is incorporated by reference into this Item 9A.
Internal Control Changes
During the fourth quarter of 2017,2020, there were no changes in our internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) under the Exchange Act) that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.



ITEM 9B.    Other Information


Not applicable.


PART III


ITEM 10.    Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance


The information required by this Item 10 is incorporated by reference to the material under the headings “Proposals Requiring Your Vote—Proposal 1: Election“Elections of Directors,” “Our Executive Officers,” “Securities Ownership—Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership, Reporting Compliance,and “Corporate Governance—Governance Policies” and “Audit and Compliance Committee”Board Matters” in our definitive Proxy Statement for the 20182021 Annual Meeting of Stockholders, which we will file with the SEC not later than April 30, 2018.2021.


ITEM 11.    Executive Compensation

The information required by this Item 11 is incorporated by reference to the material under the headings “Executive Compensation,” “Non-Employee Director Compensation” and “Executive Compensation Committee”“Corporate Governance and Board Matters” in our definitive Proxy Statement for the 20182021 Annual Meeting of Stockholders, which we will file with the SEC not later than April 30, 2018.2021.


ITEM 12.    Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters


The information required by this Item 12 is incorporated by reference to the material under the headings “Equity Compensation Plan Information” and “Securities Ownership” in our definitive Proxy Statement for the 20182021 Annual Meeting of Stockholders, which we will file with the SEC not later than April 30, 2018.2021.



ITEM 13.    Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence
    
The information required by this Item 13 is incorporated by reference to the material under the headingsheading “Corporate Governance—Transactions with Related Persons,” “OurGovernance and Board of Directors—Director Independence,Matters, “Audit and Compliance Committee,” “Executive Compensation Committee” and “Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee” in our definitive Proxy Statement for the 20182021 Annual Meeting of Stockholders, which we will file with the SEC not later than April 30, 2018.2021.




156


ITEM 14.    Principal Accountant Fees and Services


The information required by this Item 14 is incorporated by reference to the material under the heading “Proposals Requiring Your Vote—Proposal 2: Ratification of the Selection of KPMG LLP as Our Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm for Fiscal Year 2018”“Audit Matters” in our definitive Proxy Statement for the 20182021 Annual Meeting of Stockholders, which we will file with the SEC not later than April 30, 2018.2021.



157


PART IV
ITEM 15.    Exhibits and Financial Statement Schedules

Financial Statements and Financial Statement Schedules

The following documents have been included in Part II, Item 8 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K:
All other schedules have been omitted because they are inapplicable or not required or the information is included elsewhere in the Consolidated Financial Statements or notes thereto.
Exhibits
The exhibits required by Item 601 of Regulation S-K which are filed with this report are listed in the Exhibit Index.


SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, the Registrant has duly caused this Report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
Date: February 9, 2018
158


EXHIBITS
VENTAS, INC.
By:/s/ DEBRA A. CAFARO
Debra A. Cafaro
Chairman and Chief Executive Officer

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, this Report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the Registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.


SignatureTitleDate
/s/ DEBRA A. CAFAROChairman and Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer)February 9, 2018
Debra A. Cafaro
/s/ ROBERT F. PROBSTExecutive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial Officer)February 9, 2018
Robert F. Probst
/s/ GREGORY R. LIEBBESenior Vice President, Chief Accounting Officer and Controller (Principal Accounting Officer)February 9, 2018
Gregory R. Liebbe
/s/ MELODY C. BARNESDirectorFebruary 9, 2018
Melody C. Barnes
/s/ JAY M. GELLERTDirectorFebruary 9, 2018
Jay M. Gellert
/s/ RICHARD I. GILCHRISTDirectorFebruary 9, 2018
Richard I. Gilchrist
/s/ MATTHEW J. LUSTIGDirectorFebruary 9, 2018
Matthew J. Lustig
/s/ ROXANNE M. MARTINODirectorFebruary 9, 2018
Roxanne M. Martino
/s/WALTER C. RAKOWICHDirectorFebruary 9, 2018
Walter C. Rakowich
/s/ ROBERT D. REEDDirectorFebruary 9, 2018
Robert D. Reed
/s/ GLENN J. RUFRANODirectorFebruary 9, 2018
Glenn J. Rufrano
/s/ JAMES D. SHELTONDirectorFebruary 9, 2018
James D. Shelton



EXHIBIT INDEX
Exhibit

Number
Description of DocumentLocation of Document
Separation and Distribution Agreement dated as of August 17, 2015 by and between Ventas, Inc. and Care Capital Properties, Inc.Incorporated by reference herein. Previously filed as Exhibit 2.1 to our Current Report on Form 8-K, filed on August 21, 2015, File No. 001-10989.
Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation, as amended, of Ventas, Inc.Incorporated by reference herein. Previously filed as Exhibit 3.1 to our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2011, filed on August 5, 2011, File No. 001-10989.
Fifth Amended and Restated Bylaws, as amended, of Ventas, Inc.Incorporated by reference herein. Previously filed as Exhibit 3.2 to our Current Report on Form 8-K, filed on January 11, 2017, File No. 001-10989.
Specimen common stock certificate.Incorporated by reference herein. Previously filed as Exhibit 4.1 to our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2015, filed on February 12, 2016, File No. 001-10989.
Indenture dated as of September 19, 2006 by and among Ventas, Inc., Ventas Realty, Limited Partnership and Ventas Capital Corporation, as Issuer(s), the Guarantors named therein, as Guarantors, and U.S. Bank National Association, as Trustee.Incorporated by reference herein. Previously filed as Exhibit 4.9 to our Registration Statement on Form S-3, filed on April 7, 2006, File No. 333-133115.
Fourth Supplemental Indenture dated as of May 17, 2011 by and among Ventas Realty, Limited Partnership and Ventas Capital Corporation, as Issuers, Ventas, Inc., as Guarantor, and U.S. Bank National Association, as Trustee, relating to the 4.750% Senior Notes due 2021.Incorporated by reference herein. Previously filed as Exhibit 4.2 to our Current Report on Form 8-K, filed on May 20, 2011, File No. 001-10989.
Fifth Supplemental Indenture dated as of February 10, 2012 by and among Ventas Realty, Limited Partnership and Ventas Capital Corporation, as Issuers, Ventas, Inc., as Guarantor, and U.S. Bank National Association, as Trustee, relating to the 4.250% Senior Notes due 2022.Incorporated by reference herein. Previously filed as Exhibit 4.2 to our Current Report on Form 8-K, filed on February 14, 2012, File No. 001-10989.
Sixth Supplemental Indenture dated as of April 17, 2012 by and among Ventas Realty, Limited Partnership and Ventas Capital Corporation, as Issuers, Ventas, Inc., as Guarantor, and U.S. Bank National Association, as Trustee, relating to the 4.000% Senior Notes due 2019.Incorporated by reference herein. Previously filed as Exhibit 4.2 to our Current Report on Form 8-K, filed on April 18, 2012, File No. 001-10989.
Seventh Supplemental Indenture dated as of August 3, 2012 by and among Ventas Realty, Limited Partnership and Ventas Capital Corporation, as Issuers, Ventas, Inc., as Guarantor, and U.S. Bank National Association, as Trustee, relating to the 3.250% Senior Notes due 2022.Incorporated by reference herein. Previously filed as Exhibit 4.1 to our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2012, filed on October 26, 2012, File No. 001-10989.
Eighth Supplemental Indenture dated as of December 13, 2012 by and among Ventas Realty, Limited Partnership and Ventas Capital Corporation, as Issuers, Ventas, Inc., as Guarantor, and U.S. Bank National Association, as Trustee, relating to the 2.000% Senior Notes due 2018.Incorporated by reference herein. Previously filed as Exhibit 4.3 to our Current Report on Form 8-K, filed on December 13, 2012, File No. 001-10989.
Ninth Supplemental Indenture dated as of March 7, 2013 by and among Ventas Realty, Limited Partnership and Ventas Capital Corporation, as Issuers, Ventas, Inc., as Guarantor, and U.S. Bank National Association, as Trustee, relating to the 5.450% Senior Notes due 2043.Incorporated by reference herein. Previously filed as Exhibit 4.2 to our Registration Statement on Form 8-A, filed on March 7, 2013, File No. 001-10989.

Exhibit
Number
Description of DocumentLocation of Document
Tenth Supplemental Indenture dated as of March 19, 2013 by and among Ventas Realty, Limited Partnership and Ventas Capital Corporation, as Issuers, Ventas, Inc., as Guarantor, and U.S. Bank National Association, as Trustee, relating to the 2.700% Senior Notes due 2020.Incorporated by reference herein. Previously filed as Exhibit 4.2 to our Current Report on Form 8-K, filed on March 19, 2013, File No. 001-10989.
Indenture dated as of September 26, 2013 by and among Ventas, Inc., Ventas Realty, Limited Partnership, as Issuer, the Guarantors named therein, as Guarantors, and U.S. Bank National Association, as Trustee.Incorporated by reference herein. Previously filed as Exhibit 4.10 to our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2016, filed on February 14, 2017, File No. 001-10989.
Second Supplemental Indenture dated as of September 26, 2013 by and among Ventas Realty, Limited Partnership, as Issuer, Ventas, Inc., as Guarantor, and U.S. Bank National Association, as Trustee, relating to the 5.700% Senior Notes due 2043.Incorporated by reference herein. Previously filed as Exhibit 4.3 to our Current Report on Form 8-K, filed on September 26, 2013, File No. 001-10989.
Fourth Supplemental Indenture dated as of April 17, 2014 by and among Ventas Realty, Limited Partnership, as Issuer, Ventas, Inc., as Guarantor, and U.S. Bank National Association, as Trustee, relating to the 3.750% Senior Notes due 2024.Incorporated by reference herein. Previously filed as Exhibit 4.3 to our Current Report on Form 8-K, filed on April 17, 2014, File No. 001-10989.
Fifth Supplemental Indenture dated as of January 14, 2015 by and among Ventas Realty, Limited Partnership, as Issuer, Ventas, Inc., as Guarantor, and U.S. Bank National Association, as Trustee, relating to the 3.500% Senior Notes due 2025.Incorporated by reference herein. Previously filed as Exhibit 4.2 to our Current Report on Form 8-K, filed on January 14, 2015, File No. 001-10989.
Sixth Supplemental Indenture dated as of January 14, 2015 by and among Ventas Realty, Limited Partnership, as Issuer, Ventas, Inc., as Guarantor, and U.S. Bank National Association, as Trustee, relating to the 4.375% Senior Notes due 2045.Incorporated by reference herein. Previously filed as Exhibit 4.3 to our Current Report on Form 8-K, filed on January 14, 2015, File No. 001-10989.
Indenture dated as of August 19, 1997 by and between Nationwide Health Properties, Inc. and The Bank of New York, as Trustee, relating to the 6.90% Series C Medium-Term Notes due 2037 and the 6.59% Series C Medium-Term Notes due 2038.Incorporated by reference herein. Previously filed as Exhibit 1.2 to the Nationwide Health Properties, Inc. Current Report on Form 8-K, filed on August 19, 1997, File No. 001-09028 (see Exhibit 1.2 of complete submission text file).
159


Exhibit
Number
Description of DocumentLocation of Document
Supplemental Indenture dated July 1, 2011 among Nationwide Health Properties, Inc., Needles Acquisition LLC, and The Bank of New York Mellon Trust Company, N.A., as successor Trustee, relating to the 6.90% Series C Medium-Term Notes due 2037 and the 6.59% Series C Medium-Term Notes due 2038.Incorporated by reference herein. Previously filed as Exhibit 4.17 to our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2016, filed on February 14, 2017, File No. 001-10989.
Indenture dated as September 24, 2014 by and among Ventas, Inc., Ventas Canadian Finance Limited, the Guarantors parties thereto from time to time and Computershare Trust Company of Canada, as Trustee.Incorporated by reference herein. Previously filed as Exhibit 4.1 to our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2014, filed on October 24, 2014, File No. 001-10989.
First Supplemental Indenture dated as of September 24, 2014 by and among Ventas Canada Finance Limited, as Issuer, Ventas, Inc., as Guarantor, and Computershare Trust Company of Canada, as Trustee, relating to the 3.00% Senior Notes, Series A due 2019.Incorporated by reference herein. Previously filed as Exhibit 4.2 to our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2014, filed on October 24, 2014, File No. 001-10989.

Exhibit
Number
Description of DocumentLocation of Document
Second Supplemental Indenture dated as of September 24, 2014 by and among Ventas Canada Finance Limited, as Issuer, Ventas, Inc., as Guarantor, and Computershare Trust Company of Canada, as Trustee, relating to the 4.125% Senior Notes, Series B due 2024.Incorporated by reference herein. Previously filed as Exhibit 4.3 to our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2014, filed on October 24, 2014, File No. 001-10989.
Third Supplemental Indenture dated as of January 13, 2015 by and among Ventas Canada Finance Limited, as Issuer, Ventas, Inc., as Guarantor, and Computershare Trust Company of Canada, as Trustee, relating to the 3.30% Senior Notes, Series C due 2022.Incorporated by reference herein. Previously filed as Exhibit 4.24 to our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2014, filed on February 13, 2015, File No. 001-10989.
Fourth Supplemental Indenture dated as of June 1, 2017 by and among Ventas Canada Finance Limited, as Issuer, Ventas, Inc., as Guarantor, and Computershare Trust Company of Canada, as Trustee, relating to the 2.55% Senior Notes, Series D due 2023.Incorporated by reference herein. Previously filed as Exhibit 4.1 to our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2017, filed on July 28, 2017, File No. 001-10989.
Fifth Supplemental Indenture dated as of November 12, 2019 by and among Ventas Canada Finance Limited, as Issuer, Ventas, Inc., as Guarantor, and Computershare Trust Company of Canada, as Trustee, relating to the 2.80% Senior Notes, Series E due 2024.Incorporated by reference herein. Previously filed as Exhibit 4.15 to our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2019, filed on February 24, 2020, File No. 001-10989.
Sixth Supplemental Indenture dated as of November 12, 2019 by and among Ventas Canada Finance Limited, as Issuer, Ventas, Inc., as Guarantor, and Computershare Trust Company of Canada, as Trustee, relating to the Floating Rate Senior Notes, Series F due 2021.Incorporated by reference herein. Previously filed as Exhibit 4.16 to our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2019, filed on February 24, 2020, File No. 001-10989.
Indenture dated as of July 16, 2015 by and among Ventas, Inc., Ventas Realty, Limited Partnership, as Issuer, the Guarantors named therein as Guarantors, and U.S. Bank National Association, as Trustee.Incorporated by reference herein. Previously filed as Exhibit 4.1 to our Current Report on Form 8-K, filed on July 16, 2015, File No. 001-10989.
First Supplemental Indenture dated as of July 16, 2015 by and among Ventas Realty, Limited Partnership, as Issuer, Ventas Inc., as Guarantor, and U.S. Bank National Association, as Trustee, relating to the 4.125% Senior Notes due 2026.Incorporated by reference herein. Previously filed as Exhibit 4.2 to our Current Report on Form 8-K, filed on July 16, 2015, File No. 001-10989.
Second Supplemental Indenture dated as of June 2, 2016 by and among Ventas Realty, Limited Partnership, as Issuer, Ventas Inc., as Guarantor, and U.S. Bank National Association, as Trustee, relating to the 3.125% Senior Notes due 2023.Incorporated by reference herein. Previously filed as Exhibit 4.2 to our Current Report on Form 8-K, filed on June 2, 2016, File No. 001-10989.
160


Exhibit
Number
Description of DocumentLocation of Document
Third Supplemental Indenture dated as of September 21, 2016 by and among Ventas Realty, Limited Partnership, as Issuer, Ventas Inc., as Guarantor, and U.S. Bank National Association, as Trustee, relating to the 3.250% Senior Notes due 2026.Incorporated by reference herein. Previously filed as Exhibit 4.2 to our Current Report on Form 8-K, filed on September 21, 2016, File No. 001-10989.
Fourth Supplemental Indenture dated as of March 29, 2017 by and among Ventas Realty, Limited Partnership, as Issuer, Ventas, Inc., as Guarantor, and U.S. Bank National Association, as Trustee, relating to the 3.100% Senior Notes due 2023 and the 3.850% Senior Notes due 2027.Incorporated by reference herein. Previously filed as Exhibit 4.2 to our Current Report on Form 8-K, filed on March 29, 2017, File No. 001-10989.
Indenture dated February 23, 2018 among Ventas, Inc., Ventas Realty, Limited Partnership, the Guarantors named therein, and U.S. Bank National Association, as Trustee
Incorporated by reference herein. Previously filed as Exhibit 4.1 to our Current Report on Form 8-K, filed on February 23, 2018, File No. 001-10989.
First Supplemental Indenture dated as of February 23, 2018 by and among Ventas Realty, Limited Partnership, as Issuer, Ventas, Inc., as Guarantor and U.S. Bank National Association, as Trustee relating to the 4.000% Senior Notes due 2028
Incorporated by reference herein. Previously filed as Exhibit 4.2 to our Current Report on Form 8-K, filed on February 23, 2018, File No. 001-10989.
Second Supplemental Indenture dated as of August 15, 2018 by and among Ventas Realty, Limited Partnership, as Issuer, Ventas, Inc., as Guarantor and U.S. Bank National Association, as Trustee relating to the 4.400% Senior Notes due 2029
Incorporated by reference herein. Previously filed as Exhibit 4.2 to our Current Report on Form 8-K, filed on August 15, 2018, File No. 001-10989.
Third Supplemental Indenture dated as of February 26, 2019 by and among Ventas Realty, Limited Partnership, as Issuer, Ventas, Inc., as Guarantor and U.S. Bank National Association, as Trustee relating to the 3.500% Senior Notes due 2024 and 4.875% Senior Notes due 2049Incorporated by reference herein. Previously filed as Exhibit 4.2 to our Current Report on Form 8-K, filed on February 26, 2019, File No. 001-10989.
Fourth Supplemental Indenture dated as of July 3, 2019 by and among Ventas Realty, Limited Partnership, as Issuer, Ventas, Inc., as Guarantor and U.S. Bank National Association, as Trustee relating to the 2.650% Senior Notes due 2025Incorporated by reference herein. Previously filed as Exhibit 4.2 to our Current Report on Form 8-K, filed on July 3, 2019, File No. 001-10989.
Fifth Supplemental Indenture dated as of August 21, 2019 by and among Ventas Realty, Limited Partnership, as Issuer, Ventas, Inc., as Guarantor and U.S. Bank National Association, as Trustee relating to the 3.000% Senior Notes due 2030Incorporated by reference herein. Previously filed as Exhibit 4.2 to our Current Report on Form 8-K, filed on August 21, 2019, File No. 001-10989.
Sixth Supplemental Indenture dated as of April 1, 2020 by and among Ventas Realty, Limited Partnership, as Issuer, Ventas, Inc., as Guarantor and U.S. Bank National Association, as Trustee relating to the 4.750% Senior Notes due 2030.Incorporated by reference herein. Previously filed as Exhibit 4.2 to our Current Report on Form 8-K, filed on April 1, 2020, File No. 001-10989.
Description of the Registrant’s Securities.Filed herewith.
First Amended and Restated Agreement of Limited Partnership of Ventas Realty, Limited Partnership.Incorporated by reference herein. Previously filed as Exhibit 3.5 to our Registration Statement on Form S-4, as amended, filed on May 29, 2002, File No. 333-89312.

Credit and Guaranty Agreement dated July 26, 2018 among Ventas Realty, Limited Partnership, as Borrower, Ventas, Inc., as Guarantor, The Lenders party thereto from time to time, and Bank of America, N.A., as Administrative Agent.Incorporated by reference herein. Previously filed as Exhibit 10.1 to our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2018, filed on October 26, 2018, File No. 001-10989.
161


Exhibit
Number
Description of DocumentLocation of Document
First Amendment to the Credit and Guaranty Agreement, dated as of January 29, 2021, among Ventas Realty, Limited Partnership, as Borrower, Ventas, Inc., as Guarantor, the Lenders identified therein, and Bank of America, N.A., as Administrative Agent.Filed herewith.
Second Amended and Restated Credit and Guaranty Agreement, dated as of April 25, 2017, among Ventas Realty, Limited Partnership, Ventas SSL Ontario II, Inc., Ventas SSL Ontario III, Inc., Ventas Canada Finance Limited, Ventas UK Finance, Inc., and Ventas Euro Finance, LLC, as Borrowers, Ventas, Inc., as Guarantor, the Lenders identified therein, and Bank of America, N.A., as Administrative Agent, and Alternative Currency Fronting Lender, Bank of America, N.A. and JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A., as Swing Line Lenders and L/C Issuers.Incorporated by reference herein. Previously filed as Exhibit 10.3.1 to our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2017, filed on April 28, 2017, File No. 001-10989.

Exhibit
Number
Description of DocumentLocation of Document
Tax MattersThird Amended and Restated Credit and Guaranty Agreement, dated as of August 17, 2015 byJanuary 29, 2021, among Ventas Realty, Limited Partnership, Ventas SSL Ontario II, Inc., Ventas SSL Ontario III, Inc., Ventas Canada Finance Limited, Ventas UK Finance, Inc., and betweenVentas Euro Finance, LLC, as Borrowers, Ventas, Inc., as Guarantor, the Lenders identified therein, Bank of America, N.A., as Administrative Agent, and Care Capital Properties, Inc.Bank of America, N.A. and JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., as L/C Issuers.Incorporated by reference herein. Previously filed as Exhibit 10.210.1 to our Current Report on Form 8-K, filed on August 21, 2015,February 2, 2021, File No. 001-10989.
Employee Matters Agreement dated as of August 17, 2015 by and between Ventas, Inc. and Care Capital Properties, Inc.Incorporated by reference herein. Previously filed as Exhibit 10.3 to our Current Report on Form 8-K, filed on August 21, 2015, File No. 001-10989.
Ventas, Inc. 2004 Stock Plan for Directors, as amended.Incorporated by reference herein. Previously filed as Exhibit 10.16.1 to our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2004, filed on March 1, 2005, File No. 33-107942.
Ventas, Inc. 2006 Incentive Plan, as amended.Incorporated by reference herein. Previously filed as Exhibit 10.10.1 to our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008, filed on February 27, 2009, File No. 001-10989.
Form of Stock Option Agreement—2006 Incentive Plan.Incorporated by reference herein. Previously filed as Exhibit 10.15.2 to our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2006, filed on February 22, 2007, File No. 001-10989.
Form of Restricted Stock Agreement—2006 Incentive Plan.Incorporated by reference herein. Previously filed as Exhibit 10.15.3 to our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2006, filed on February 22, 2007, File No. 001-10989.
Ventas, Inc. 2006 Stock Plan for Directors, as amended.Incorporated by reference herein. Previously filed as Exhibit 10.1 to our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2012, filed on April 27, 2012, File No. 001-10989.
Form of Stock Option Agreement—2006 Stock Plan for Directors.Incorporated by reference herein. Previously filed as Exhibit 10.11.2 to our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008, filed on February 27, 2009, File No. 001-10989.
Form of Amendment to Stock Option Agreement—2006 Stock Plan for Directors.Incorporated by reference herein. Previously filed as Exhibit 10.2 to our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2012, filed on April 27, 2012, File No. 001-10989.
162


Exhibit
Number
Description of DocumentLocation of Document
Form of Restricted Stock Unit Agreement—2006 Stock Plan for Directors.Incorporated by reference herein. Previously filed as Exhibit 10.11.4 to our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008, filed on February 27, 2009, File No. 001-10989.
Ventas, Inc. 2012 Incentive Plan.Incorporated by reference herein. Previously filed as Exhibit 10.1 to our Current Report on Form 8-K, filed on May 23, 2012, File No. 001-10989.
First Amendment to the Ventas, Inc. 2012 Incentive Plan.Incorporated by reference herein. Previously filed as Exhibit 10.10.7 to our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2017, filed on April 28, 2017, File No. 001-10989.
Form of Stock Option Agreement (Employees) under the Ventas, Inc. 2012 Incentive Plan.Incorporated by reference herein. Previously filed as Exhibit 10.6.2 to our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2014, filed February 13, 2015, File No. 001-10989.
Form of Restricted Stock Agreement (Employees) under the Ventas, Inc. 2012 Incentive Plan.Incorporated by reference herein. Previously filed as Exhibit 10.6.3 to our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2014, filed on February 13, 2015, File No. 001-10989.

Exhibit
Number
Description of DocumentLocation of Document
Form of Stock Option Agreement (Directors) under the Ventas, Inc. 2012 Incentive Plan.Incorporated by reference herein. Previously filed as Exhibit 10.4 to our Registration Form on S-8, filed on August 7, 2012, File No. 333-183121.
Form of Restricted Stock Agreement (Directors) under the Ventas, Inc. 2012 Incentive Plan.Incorporated by reference herein. Previously filed as Exhibit 10.5 to our Registration Form on S-8, filed on August 7, 2012, File No. 333-183121.
Form of Restricted Stock Unit Agreement (Directors) under the Ventas, Inc. 2012 Incentive Plan.Incorporated by reference herein. Previously filed as Exhibit 10.6 to our Registration Form on S-8, filed on August 7, 2012, File No. 333-183121.
Form of Performance-Based Restricted Stock Unit Agreement (CEO) under the Ventas, Inc. 2012 Incentive Plan.Incorporated by reference herein. Previously filed as Exhibit 10.10.8 to our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2017, filed on April 28, 2017, File No. 001-10989.
Form of Restricted Stock Unit Agreement (CEO) under the Ventas, Inc. 2012 Incentive Plan.Incorporated by reference herein. Previously filed as Exhibit 10.10.9 to our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2017, filed on April 28, 2017, File No. 001-10989.
Form of Transition Restricted Stock Unit Agreement (CEO) under the Ventas, Inc. 2012 Incentive Plan.Incorporated by reference herein. Previously filed as Exhibit 10.10.10 to our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2017, filed on April 28, 2017, File No. 001-10989.
Form of Performance-Based Restricted Stock Unit Agreement (Non-CEO) under the Ventas, Inc. 2012 Incentive Plan.Incorporated by reference herein. Previously filed as Exhibit 10.10.11 to our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2017, filed on April 28, 2017, File No. 001-10989.
Form of Restricted Stock Unit Agreement (Non-CEO) under the Ventas, Inc. 2012 Incentive Plan.Incorporated by reference herein. Previously filed as Exhibit 10.10.12 to our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2017, filed on April 28, 2017, File No. 001-10989.
Form of Transition Restricted Stock Unit Agreement (Non-CEO) under the Ventas, Inc. 2012 Incentive Plan.Incorporated by reference herein. Previously filed as Exhibit 10.10.13 to our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2017, filed on April 28, 2017, File No. 001-10989.
Ventas Executive Deferred Stock Compensation Plan, as amended and restated on December 7, 2017.Filed herewith.Incorporated by reference herein. Previously filed as Exhibit 10.9.1 to our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2017, filed on February 9, 2018, File No. 001-10989.
163


Exhibit
Number
Description of DocumentLocation of Document
Deferral Election Form under the Ventas Executive Deferred Stock Compensation Plan, as amended and restated on December 7, 2017.Filed herewith.Incorporated by reference herein. Previously filed as Exhibit 10.9.2 to our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2017, filed on February 9, 2018, File No. 001-10989.
.
Ventas Nonemployee Directors’ Deferred Stock Compensation Plan, as amended.Incorporated by reference herein. Previously filed as Exhibit 10.13.1 to our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008, filed on February 27, 2009, File No. 001-10989.
Deferral Election Form under the Ventas Nonemployee Directors’ Deferred Stock Compensation Plan.Incorporated by reference herein. Previously filed as Exhibit 10.13.2 to our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008, filed on February 27, 2009, File No. 001-10989.
Nationwide Health Properties, Inc. 2005 Performance Incentive Plan.Incorporated by reference herein. Previously filed as Appendix B to the Nationwide Health Properties, Inc. definitive Proxy Statement for the 2005 Annual Meeting, filed on March 24, 2005, File No. 001-09028.
First Amendment to the Nationwide Health Properties, Inc. 2005 Performance Incentive Plan, dated October 28, 2008.Incorporated by reference herein. Previously filed as Exhibit 10.1 to the Nationwide Health Properties, Inc. Current Report on Form 8-K, filed on November 3, 2008, File No. 001-09028.

Exhibit
Number10.12.1*
Description of DocumentLocation of Document
Nationwide Health Properties, Inc. Retirement Plan for Directors, as amended and restated on April 20, 2006.Incorporated by reference herein. Previously filed as Exhibit 10.1 to the Nationwide Health Properties, Inc. Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2006, filed on May 4, 2006, File No. 001-09028.
Amendment dated October 28, 2008 to the Nationwide Health Properties, Inc. Retirement Plan for Directors, as amended and restated on April 20, 2006.Incorporated by reference herein. Previously filed as Exhibit 10.9 to the Nationwide Health Properties, Inc. Current Report on Form 8-K, filed on November 3, 2008, File No. 001-09028.
Second Amended and Restated Employment Agreement dated as of March 22, 2011 between Ventas, Inc. and Debra A. Cafaro.Incorporated by reference herein. Previously filed as Exhibit 10.1 to our Current Report on Form 8-K, filed on March 24, 2011, File No. 001-10989.
Employment Agreement dated as of July 31, 1998 between Ventas, Inc. and T. Richard Riney.Incorporated by reference herein. Previously filed as Exhibit 10.15.2.1 to our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2002, filed on February 26, 2003, File No. 001-10989.
Amendment dated as of September 30, 1999 to Employment Agreement between Ventas, Inc. and T. Richard Riney.Incorporated by reference herein. Previously filed as Exhibit 10.15.2.2 to our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2002, filed on February 26, 2003, File No. 001-10989.
Amendment dated as of March 19, 2007 to Employment Agreement between Ventas, Inc. and T. Richard Riney.Incorporated by reference herein. Previously filed as Exhibit 10.1 to our Current Report on Form 8-K, filed on March 23, 2007, File No. 001-10989.
Amendment dated as of December 31, 2008 to Employment Agreement between Ventas, Inc. and T. Richard Riney.Incorporated by reference herein. Previously filed as Exhibit 10.15.4 to our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008, filed on February 27, 2009, File No. 001-10989.
Amended and Restated Change-in-Control Severance Agreement dated as of March 22, 2011 between Ventas, Inc. and T. Richard Riney.Incorporated by reference herein. Previously filed as Exhibit 10.2 to our Current Report on Form 8-K, filed on March 24, 2011, File No. 001-10989.
Employment Agreement dated as of June 22, 2010 between Ventas, Inc. and Todd W. Lillibridge.Incorporated by reference herein. Previously filed as Exhibit 10.1 to our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2010, filed on July 30, 2010, File No. 001-10989.
Employee Protection and Noncompetition Agreement dated June 17, 2015 between Ventas, Inc. and Todd W. Lillibridge.Incorporated by reference herein. Previously filed as Exhibit 10.1 to our Current Report on Form 8-K, filed on June 23, 2015, File No., 001-10989.
Employment Transition Agreement dated as of July 25, 2017 between Ventas, Inc. and Todd W. Lillibridge.Incorporated by reference herein. Previously filed as Exhibit 10.1 to our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2017, filed on October 27, 2017, File No. 001-10989.
Employee Protection and Noncompetition Agreement dated as of October 21, 2013 between Ventas, Inc. and John D. Cobb.Incorporated by reference herein. Previously filed as Exhibit 10.18 to our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2013, filed on February 18, 2014, File No. 001-10989.
Amendment dated December 8, 2017 to Employee Protection and Noncompetition Agreement dated as of October 21, 2013 between Ventas, Inc. and John D. Cobb.Filed herewith.Incorporated by reference herein. Previously filed as Exhibit 10.16.2 to our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2017, filed on February 9, 2018, File No. 001-10989.
Offer Letter dated September 16, 2014 from Ventas, Inc. to Robert F. Probst.Incorporated by reference herein. Previously filed as Exhibit 10.1 to our Current Report on Form 8-K, filed on September 29, 2014, File No. 001-10989.
Employee Protection and Noncompetition Agreement dated September 16, 2014 between Ventas, Inc. and Robert F. Probst.Incorporated by reference herein. Previously filed as Exhibit 10.2 to our Current Report on Form 8-K, filed on September 29, 2014, File No. 001-10989.

Exhibit
Number10.15.3*
Description of DocumentLocation of Document
Amendment dated December 8, 2017 to Employee Protection and Noncompetition Agreement dated as of September 16, 2014 between Ventas, Inc. and Robert F. Probst.Filed herewith.Incorporated by reference herein. Previously filed as Exhibit 10.17.3 to our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2017, filed on February 9, 2018, File No. 001-10989.
Offer of Employment Term Sheet dated March 20, 2018 from Ventas, Inc. to Peter J. Bulgarelli.Incorporated by reference herein. Previously filed as Exhibit 10.1.1 to our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2018, filed on April 27, 2018, File No. 001-10989.
Employee Protection and Noncompetition Agreement dated March 20, 2018 between Ventas, Inc. and Peter J. Bulgarelli.
Incorporated by reference herein. Previously filed as Exhibit 10.1.2 to our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2018, filed on April 27, 2018, File No. 001-10989.
Ventas Employee and Director Stock Purchase Plan, as amended.Incorporated by reference herein. Previously filed as Exhibit 10.18 to our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008, filed on February 27, 2009, File No. 001-10989.
164


Exhibit
Number
Description of DocumentLocation of Document
Statement Regarding Computation of Ratios of EarningsEmployee Protection and Restrictive Covenants Agreement dated January 21, 2020 between Ventas, Inc. and Carey Shea Roberts.Incorporated by reference herein. Previously filed as Exhibit 10.2.1 to Fixed Charges.our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2020, filed on May 8, 2020, File No. 001-10989.
Employment Bonus Agreement dated March 4, 2020 between Ventas, Inc. and Carey Shea Roberts.Incorporated by reference herein. Previously filed as Exhibit 10.2.2 to our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2020, filed on May 8, 2020, File No. 001-10989.
Offer Letter dated December 22, 2019 from Ventas, Inc. to Carey Shea Roberts.Filed herewith.
Employee Protection and Restrictive Covenants Agreement dated February 7, 2020 between Ventas, Inc. and J. Justin Hutchens.Incorporated by reference herein. Previously filed as Exhibit 10.3 to our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2020, filed on May 8, 2020, File No. 001-10989.
Offer Letter dated January 30, 2020 from Ventas, Inc. to J. Justin Hutchens.Filed herewith.
Subsidiaries of Ventas, Inc.Filed herewith.
List of Guarantors and Issuers of Guaranteed Securities.Filed herewith.
Consent of KPMG LLP.Filed herewith.
Certification of Debra A. Cafaro, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer, pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) under the Exchange Act.Filed herewith.
Certification of Robert F. Probst, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer, pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) under the Exchange Act.Filed herewith.
Certification of Debra A. Cafaro, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer, pursuant to Rule 13a-14(b) under the Exchange Act and 18 U.S.C. 1350.Filed herewith.
Certification of Robert F. Probst, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer, pursuant to Rule 13a-14(b) under the Exchange Act and 18 U.S.C. 1350.Filed herewith.
101The following materials from the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2020, formatted in iXBRL (Inline Extensible Business Reporting Language): (i) the Consolidated Balance Sheets, (ii) the Consolidated Statements of Income, (iii) the Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income, (iv) the Consolidated Statements of Equity, (v) the Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows, (vi) Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements and (vii) Schedule III and IV.Filed herewith.
104Cover Page Interactive Data File.File (embedded within the Inline XBRL document).Filed herewith.

* Management contract or compensatory plan or arrangement required to be filed as an exhibit pursuant to Item 15(b) of Form 10-K.



165


ITEM 16.    Form 10-K Summary
None.

166



SIGNATURES
    Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, the Registrant has duly caused this Report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
Date: February 23, 2021
VENTAS, INC.
By:/s/ DEBRA A. CAFARO
Debra A. Cafaro
Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, this Report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the Registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.
191
167


SignatureTitleDate
/s/ DEBRA A. CAFAROChairman and Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer)February 23, 2021
Debra A. Cafaro
/s/ ROBERT F. PROBSTExecutive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial Officer)February 23, 2021
Robert F. Probst
/s/ GREGORY R. LIEBBESenior Vice President, Chief Accounting Officer and Controller (Principal Accounting Officer)February 23, 2021
Gregory R. Liebbe
/s/ MELODY C. BARNESDirectorFebruary 23, 2021
Melody C. Barnes
/s/ JAY M. GELLERTDirectorFebruary 23, 2021
Jay M. Gellert
/s/ RICHARD I. GILCHRISTDirectorFebruary 23, 2021
Richard I. Gilchrist
/s/ MATTHEW J. LUSTIGDirectorFebruary 23, 2021
Matthew J. Lustig
/s/ ROXANNE M. MARTINODirectorFebruary 23, 2021
Roxanne M. Martino
/s/ MARGUERITE M. NADERDirectorFebruary 23, 2021
Marguerite M. Nader
/s/ SEAN P. NOLANDirectorFebruary 23, 2021
Sean P. Nolan
/s/WALTER C. RAKOWICHDirectorFebruary 23, 2021
Walter C. Rakowich
/s/ ROBERT D. REEDDirectorFebruary 23, 2021
Robert D. Reed
/s/ JAMES D. SHELTONDirectorFebruary 23, 2021
James D. Shelton
/s/ MAURICE S. SMITHDirectorFebruary 23, 2021
Maurice S. Smith

168